From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Jul 9 05:25:04 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id FAA28403 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 05:25:04 -0700 Received: from monge.brunel.ac.uk (pp@monge.brunel.ac.uk [134.83.72.1]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id FAA28397 for ; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 05:25:03 -0700 Received: from mishmash.brunel.ac.uk by monge.brunel.ac.uk with SMTP (PP) id <14553-0@monge.brunel.ac.uk>; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 13:14:22 +0100 From: Nik Clayton Message-Id: <25846.9507091214@mishmash.brunel.ac.uk> Subject: Perl 5.001m kind of broken To: ports@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 9 Jul 1995 13:14:33 +0100 (BST) Cc: markm@freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL21] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1155 Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk If I do # cd /usr/ports/lang/perl5 # make the response is ===> Configuring for perl5.001m ./Configure -sde -Dprefix=/usr/local -des Configure: unknown opton - Configure: unknown option -Dprefix=/usr/local [... Configure usage message deleted ...] and the 'make' halts. However, I can then just 'cd work/perl5.001m' and run Configure manually and it works fine (it even passes all the tests correctly, which no previous version of Perl 5 has done). On a slightly related note, shouldn't the default manpath be /usr/local/man and then /usr/share/man? That way any updated manual pages from packages are found first? I tried editing /etc/manpath.config to put /usr/local/man's MANDATORY_MANPATH before /usr/share/man's, but it didn't work. In the end I just set the MANPATH variable in the global .cshrc. N [CC'd to the Perl 5 maintainer] =-[Opinion, n: See the above text for an example]=-=[Kibo #: e]-[RYRYRY]=-= =-[The Silly Sod Society: To perfect and to swerve]=-[beable]-=[TP U BG]=-= Zymurgy`s First Law of Evolving System Dynamics: Once you open a can of worms, the only way to recan them is to use a larger can. From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Jul 9 10:12:16 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id KAA04097 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 10:12:16 -0700 Received: from grunt.grondar.za (grunt.grondar.za [196.7.18.129]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA04091 for ; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 10:12:03 -0700 Received: from grumble.grondar.za (grumble.grondar.za [196.7.18.130]) by grunt.grondar.za (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id TAA22912; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 19:11:49 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by grumble.grondar.za (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id TAA13290; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 19:11:47 +0200 Message-Id: <199507091711.TAA13290@grumble.grondar.za> X-Authentication-Warning: grumble.grondar.za: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: Nik Clayton cc: ports@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Perl 5.001m kind of broken Date: Sun, 09 Jul 1995 19:11:43 +0200 From: Mark Murray Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk I just checked it, and it works fine. What version of FreeBSD do you have? M > If I do > > # cd /usr/ports/lang/perl5 > # make > > the response is > > ===> Configuring for perl5.001m > ./Configure -sde -Dprefix=/usr/local -des > Configure: unknown opton - > Configure: unknown option -Dprefix=/usr/local > [... Configure usage message deleted ...] > > and the 'make' halts. > > However, I can then just 'cd work/perl5.001m' and run Configure manually > and it works fine (it even passes all the tests correctly, which no > previous version of Perl 5 has done). > > On a slightly related note, shouldn't the default manpath be > /usr/local/man and then /usr/share/man? That way any updated manual > pages from packages are found first? I tried editing /etc/manpath.config > to put /usr/local/man's MANDATORY_MANPATH before /usr/share/man's, but > it didn't work. In the end I just set the MANPATH variable in the global > .cshrc. > > N > > [CC'd to the Perl 5 maintainer] > > =-[Opinion, n: See the above text for an example]=-=[Kibo #: e]-[RYRYRY]=-= > =-[The Silly Sod Society: To perfect and to swerve]=-[beable]-=[TP U BG]=-= Zymurgy`s First Law of Evolving System Dynamics: > Once you open a can of worms, the only way to recan > them is to use a larger can. -- Mark Murray 46 Harvey Rd, Claremont, Cape Town 7700, South Africa +27 21 61-3768 GMT+0200 From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Jul 9 13:14:35 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id NAA12107 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 13:14:35 -0700 Received: from eikon.regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de (root@eikon.regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de [129.187.42.3]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id NAA12095 ; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 13:14:27 -0700 Received: from vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de ([129.187.142.36]) by eikon.regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de with SMTP id <55301>; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 22:14:20 +0200 Received: (from jhs@localhost) by vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de (8.6.11/8.6.9) id WAA22756; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 22:13:49 +0200 Date: Sun, 9 Jul 1995 22:13:49 +0200 From: Julian Howard Stacey Message-Id: <199507092013.WAA22756@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: malloc-2.5.3b.c Cc: roberto@freebsd.org Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk I get: >> Checksum mismatch for malloc-2.5.3b.c just after make >> malloc-2.5.3b.c doesn't seem to exist on this system. >> Attempting to fetch from ftp://gee.cs.oswego.edu/pub/misc/ Receiving file: malloc-2.5.3b.c 100% 0 40021 bytes. ETA: 0:00 malloc-2.5.3b.c: 40021 bytes received in 695.35 seconds, 57.56 Bytes/sec. ive got this twice (ie fetched & failed twice) I have cksum /usr/ports/distfiles/malloc-2.5.3b.c 1860430478 40021 /usr/ports/distfiles/malloc-2.5.3b.c md5 /usr/ports/distfiles/malloc-2.5.3b.c MD5 (/usr/ports/distfiles/malloc-2.5.3b.c) = abddbb8cc376de2a220c4b573199214f & I see cat files/md5 MD5 (malloc-2.5.3b.c) = 7936180a964854d052ae13ce6e1015d7 Comments ? Julian S From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Jul 9 15:26:50 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id PAA16874 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 15:26:50 -0700 Received: from ibp.ibp.fr (ibp.ibp.fr [132.227.60.30]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id PAA16868 ; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 15:26:47 -0700 Received: from blaise.ibp.fr (blaise.ibp.fr [132.227.60.1]) by ibp.ibp.fr (8.6.12/jtpda-5.0) with ESMTP id AAA15778 ; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 00:26:44 +0200 Received: from (roberto@localhost) by blaise.ibp.fr (8.6.12/jtpda-5.0) id AAA18841 ; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 00:26:44 +0200 From: roberto@blaise.ibp.fr (Ollivier Robert) Message-Id: <199507092226.AAA18841@blaise.ibp.fr> Subject: Re: malloc-2.5.3b.c To: jhs@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de (Julian Howard Stacey) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 1995 00:26:43 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: ports@freebsd.org, roberto@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199507092013.WAA22756@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de> from "Julian Howard Stacey" at Jul 9, 95 10:13:49 pm X-Operating-System: FreeBSD BUILT-19950501 ctm#617 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 602 Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > & I see cat files/md5 > MD5 (malloc-2.5.3b.c) = 7936180a964854d052ae13ce6e1015d7 > > Comments ? Doug Lea apparently modified the file in Jun to show that it was now released and not anymore unfinished : /* A version of malloc/free/realloc written by Doug Lea and released to the public domain. VERSION 2.5.3b (Mon Jun 12 07:45:17 1995: Changed status from unreleased to released to reflect reality!) I will update the md5 file. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD keltia 2.0-BUILT-19950503 #3: Wed May 3 19:53:04 MET DST 1995 From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Jul 9 15:31:12 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id PAA16995 for ports-outgoing; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 15:31:12 -0700 Received: from ibp.ibp.fr (ibp.ibp.fr [132.227.60.30]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id PAA16989 ; Sun, 9 Jul 1995 15:31:09 -0700 Received: from blaise.ibp.fr (blaise.ibp.fr [132.227.60.1]) by ibp.ibp.fr (8.6.12/jtpda-5.0) with ESMTP id AAA15794 ; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 00:31:07 +0200 Received: from (roberto@localhost) by blaise.ibp.fr (8.6.12/jtpda-5.0) id AAA18879 ; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 00:31:06 +0200 From: roberto@blaise.ibp.fr (Ollivier Robert) Message-Id: <199507092231.AAA18879@blaise.ibp.fr> Subject: Re: malloc-2.5.3b.c To: roberto@blaise.ibp.fr (Ollivier Robert) Date: Mon, 10 Jul 1995 00:31:06 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: jhs@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de, ports@freebsd.org, roberto@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199507092226.AAA18841@blaise.ibp.fr> from "Ollivier Robert" at Jul 10, 95 00:26:43 am X-Operating-System: FreeBSD BUILT-19950501 ctm#617 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 696 Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > > I will update the md5 file. To follow my own article, I don't have the right to put the malloc-*.c file in /usr/ports so the make fails. Asami, could you please either put me in the ports group or move the file here ? 217 [15:29] roberto@freefall:~/libdlmalloc> make >> malloc-2.5.3b.c doesn't seem to exist on this system. >> Attempting to fetch it from a master site. NcFTP: and . (13): Permission denied >> Couldn't fetch it - please try to retreive this >> port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles and try again. *** Error code 1 Stop. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD keltia 2.0-BUILT-19950503 #3: Wed May 3 19:53:04 MET DST 1995 From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Jul 10 04:51:57 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id EAA06208 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 04:51:57 -0700 Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id EAA06202 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 04:51:56 -0700 Received: (from jkh@localhost) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id BAA03190 for ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 01:42:26 -0700 Date: Mon, 10 Jul 1995 01:42:26 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Message-Id: <199507100842.BAA03190@time.cdrom.com> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Who did the xpilots port before? Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk It seems to have gone missing in the 1.1.5.1 -> 2.0 transition.. Would you like to do it again? :-) Same also for xtank! I've been trying to relax a little lately and finding the lack of good games to be a real impediment.. :) Jordan From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Jul 10 14:55:32 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id OAA24181 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 14:55:32 -0700 Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id OAA24174 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 14:55:29 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id OAA01505 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 14:55:05 -0700 To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Dmitry Khrustalev: ports/609: tin cannot find sendmail and vi Date: Mon, 10 Jul 1995 14:55:05 -0700 Message-ID: <1503.805413305@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Does ports get this mail? It certainly should, IMNSHO.. Jordan ------- Forwarded Message Return-Path: owner-freebsd-bugs@freefall.cdrom.com Received: from freefall.cdrom.com (freefall.cdrom.com [192.216.222.4]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) with ESMTP id KAA01088 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 10:42:44 -0700 Received: from localhost (daemon@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id KAA16678 ; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 10:40:34 -0700 Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id KAA16642 for bugs-outgoing; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 10:40:03 -0700 Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id KAA16635 ; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 10:40:03 -0700 Date: Mon, 10 Jul 1995 10:40:03 -0700 Message-Id: <199507101740.KAA16635@freefall.cdrom.com> From: Dmitry Khrustalev Reply-To: Dmitry Khrustalev To: freebsd-bugs@freefall.cdrom.com Subject: ports/609: tin cannot find sendmail and vi In-Reply-To: Your message of Mon, 10 Jul 1995 21:31:09 +0400 <199507101731.VAA01090@satty.npi.msu.su> Sender: bugs-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk >Number: 609 >Category: ports >Synopsis: tin cannot find sendmail and vi >Confidential: no >Severity: critical >Priority: medium >Responsible: freebsd-bugs (FreeBSD bugs mailing list) >State: open >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Mon Jul 10 10:40:02 1995 >Originator: Dmitry Khrustalev >Organization: >Release: FreeBSD 2.0-BUILT-19950627 i386 >Environment: >Description: Tin cannot find sendmail and vi executables, it looks for /usr/lib/sendmail and /usr/ucb/vi. >How-To-Repeat: >Fix: Apply the following patch: *** tin.h.orig Mon Jul 10 20:58:13 1995 - --- tin.h Mon Jul 10 20:58:58 1995 *************** *** 279,285 **** # define strchr(str, ch) index(str, ch) # define strrchr(str, ch) rindex(str, ch) # define DEFAULT_SHELL "/bin/csh" ! # if defined(__386BSD__) || defined(__bsdi__) # define DEFAULT_EDITOR "/usr/bin/vi" # define DEFAULT_PRINTER "/usr/bin/lpr" # define DEFAULT_MAILER "/usr/sbin/sendmail" - --- 279,285 ---- # define strchr(str, ch) index(str, ch) # define strrchr(str, ch) rindex(str, ch) # define DEFAULT_SHELL "/bin/csh" ! # if defined(__386BSD__) || defined(__bsdi__) || defined(__FreeBSD__) # define DEFAULT_EDITOR "/usr/bin/vi" # define DEFAULT_PRINTER "/usr/bin/lpr" # define DEFAULT_MAILER "/usr/sbin/sendmail" >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: ------- End of Forwarded Message From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Jul 10 17:23:44 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id RAA27496 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 17:23:44 -0700 Received: from crh.cl.msu.edu (crh.cl.msu.edu [35.8.1.24]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id RAA27490 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 17:23:42 -0700 Received: (from henrich@localhost) by crh.cl.msu.edu (8.6.11/8.6.9) id UAA09417 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 20:24:41 -0400 From: Charles Henrich Message-Id: <199507110024.UAA09417@crh.cl.msu.edu> Subject: maplay 1.3beta To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 10 Jul 1995 20:24:41 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 277 Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk I have ported maplay1.3beta to FreeBSD and submitted the changes back to the author. Would anyone be interested in a tarfile of the thing? -Crh Charles Henrich Michigan State University henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu http://rs560.msu.edu/~henrich/ From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Jul 10 19:26:02 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id TAA01113 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 19:26:02 -0700 Received: from seaquest (seaquest.sea.legent.com [155.35.41.137]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id TAA01106 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 19:25:55 -0700 Received: by seaquest (5.x/SMI-SVR4(DEO-022095 Problems to obrien@sea.legent.com)) id AA28809; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 22:25:20 -0400 From: obrien@Sea.Legent.com (David O'Brien) Message-Id: <9507110225.AA28809@seaquest> Subject: Re: Dmitry Khrustalev: ports/609: tin cannot find sendmail and vi To: ports@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 10 Jul 1995 22:25:20 -0400 (EDT) Cc: Dmitry@Sea.Legent.com, Khrustalev@Sea.Legent.com, In-Reply-To: <1503.805413305@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Jul 10, 95 02:55:05 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 PGP2] Content-Type: text Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > Subject: ports/609: tin cannot find sendmail and vi > > >Description: > > Tin cannot find sendmail and vi executables, it looks for > /usr/lib/sendmail and /usr/ucb/vi. > I would suggest working from the tin 1.30 beta rather than 1.22. tin.h has changed slightly, but this problem (and now another one) still exists. In addition to grep'ing for __NetBSD__ and adding __FreeBSD__ to the list (isn't there a common predefined symbol that could catch both??? how about adding __bsd4_4__ to both or something), screen.c needs a mod. Change line 80 (#else) to ``# elif !defined(__FreeBSD__)''. BTW, tin 1.30 can be gotten from ftp.scn.de:/pub/news/tin. Watch the definition of ``SPOOLDIR'' in the Makefile. -- David (obrien@sea.legent.com) From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Jul 10 19:44:43 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id TAA01872 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 19:44:43 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id TAA01865 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 19:44:36 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id TAA02025; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 19:44:26 -0700 Date: Mon, 10 Jul 1995 19:44:26 -0700 Message-Id: <199507110244.TAA02025@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: mmead@Glock.COM CC: ports@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <199507072019.QAA09747@Glock.COM> (mmead@Glock.COM) Subject: Re: diffs to make Makefiles do MASTER_SITES+= From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk * I changed the MASTER_SITES= lines in all the Makefiles which use it * to MASTER_SITES+= so that when I want to have a package grabbed from a * closer mirror I can do it as such: make * MASTER_SITES="ftp://some.where/some/path" ... here's the context diffs for * the entire ports tree. Wow thanks, that is a good idea but I don't know if it is really necessary to patch all the Makefiles. There is a hook called "MASTER_SITE_OVERRIDE" already in bsd.port.mk to override the master sites. It used to just override the MASTER_SITES setting, I think we can change it to put it in front of the original MASTER_SITES. Try this patch to /usr/share/mk/bsd.port.mk and make MASTER_SITE_OVERRIDE=ftp://some.where/some/path Tell me how it goes. It should try this "some.where" first, and then go to the MASTER_SITES in the ports Makefile only if it failed. Thanks. Satoshi ------- diff -u -r1.171 bsd.port.mk --- 1.171 1995/07/11 02:15:35 +++ bsd.port.mk 1995/07/11 02:27:35 @@ -313,8 +313,8 @@ MASTER_SITES+= ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/distfiles/ PATCH_SITES+= ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/distfiles/${PATCH_PRFX} .else -MASTER_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_OVERRIDE} -PATCH_SITES= ${MASTER_SITE_OVERRIDE}${PATCH_PRFX} +MASTER_SITES:= ${MASTER_SITE_OVERRIDE} ${MASTER_SITES} +PATCH_SITES:= ${MASTER_SITE_OVERRIDE}${PATCH_PRFX} ${PATCH_SITES} .endif .if defined(PATCH_PRFX) From owner-freebsd-ports Mon Jul 10 20:06:39 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id UAA03293 for ports-outgoing; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 20:06:39 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id UAA03286 for ; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 20:06:35 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id UAA05868; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 20:06:23 -0700 Date: Mon, 10 Jul 1995 20:06:23 -0700 Message-Id: <199507110306.UAA05868@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: roberto@blaise.ibp.fr CC: ports@freebsd.org, root@freefall.cdrom.com In-reply-to: <199507092231.AAA18879@blaise.ibp.fr> (roberto@blaise.ibp.fr) Subject: Re: malloc-2.5.3b.c From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk (My first name is "Satoshi", by the way) * To follow my own article, I don't have the right to put the malloc-*.c file * in /usr/ports so the make fails. Asami, could you please either put me * in the ports group or move the file here ? I put you in the ports group on thud. I'm not root on freefall, they can do that for you (see CC:). Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Jul 11 01:28:20 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id BAA12063 for ports-outgoing; Tue, 11 Jul 1995 01:28:20 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id BAA12055 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 1995 01:28:17 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id BAA14452; Tue, 11 Jul 1995 01:27:47 -0700 Date: Tue, 11 Jul 1995 01:27:47 -0700 Message-Id: <199507110827.BAA14452@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: janek@gaja.ipan.lublin.pl CC: ports@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <199507051125.NAA05754@gaja.ipan.lublin.pl> (message from Janusz Kokot on Wed, 5 Jul 1995 13:25:38 +0200) Subject: Re: mtalk port From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk * I uploaded mtalk.tgz to freebsd.cdrom.com/pub/FreeBSD/incoming * This is program to talk over internet Thanks, but I'm not sure what to do with the "patch-aa.for_sound_v30" file. There already is a patch-aa file, is this supposed to replace it for users who use "sound_v30" (whatever that is)? It compiled and packaged beautifully, by the way. Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Jul 11 04:19:51 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id EAA17216 for ports-outgoing; Tue, 11 Jul 1995 04:19:51 -0700 Received: from gaja.ipan.lublin.pl (gaja.ipan.lublin.pl [193.59.19.151]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id EAA17208 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 1995 04:19:44 -0700 Received: (from janek@localhost) by gaja.ipan.lublin.pl (8.6.11/8.6.9) id LAA15444; Tue, 11 Jul 1995 11:51:46 +0200 Date: Tue, 11 Jul 1995 11:51:46 +0200 From: Janusz Kokot Message-Id: <199507110951.LAA15444@gaja.ipan.lublin.pl> To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu, janek@gaja.ipan.lublin.pl Subject: Re: mtalk port Cc: ports@freebsd.org Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk File patch-aa.for_sound_v30 is for users who use VoxWare v. 3.0. Standart sound driver does not work properly on my GUS 512k. -------------------------- Janusz Kokot Institute of Agrophysics PAS Lublin, Poland email: janek@gaja.ipan.lublin.pl From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Jul 11 05:29:40 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id FAA18749 for ports-outgoing; Tue, 11 Jul 1995 05:29:40 -0700 Received: from PLUMCS11.UMCS.LUBLIN.PL (plumcs11.umcs.lublin.pl [192.147.37.100]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id FAA18743 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 1995 05:29:33 -0700 Received: from demeter.ipan.lublin.pl by PLUMCS11.UMCS.LUBLIN.PL (IBM VM SMTP V2R2) with TCP; Tue, 11 Jul 95 14:27:53 CET Received: from DEMETER/MAILQUEUE by demeter.ipan.lublin.pl (Mercury 1.20); 11 Jul 95 14:29:13 GMT+1 Received: from MAILQUEUE by DEMETER (Mercury 1.20); 11 Jul 95 14:28:34 GMT+1 From: "Janusz Kokot" Organization: Institute of Agrophysics PAS To: ports@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 11 Jul 1995 14:28:33 CET MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: Radio port Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail v3.22 Message-ID: <3042CE7769F@demeter.ipan.lublin.pl> Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk I uploaded updated port of radio-2.0.4 to freebsd.cdrom.com/pub/FreeBSD/incoming/radio3.tgz Thanks to Bill Fenner for his help. ---------------------------------------------------- Janusz Kokot Institute of Agrophysics, Polish Academy of Sciences E-Mail: jkokot@demeter.ipan.lublin From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Jul 11 07:30:17 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id HAA21607 for ports-outgoing; Tue, 11 Jul 1995 07:30:17 -0700 Received: from seaquest (seaquest.sea.legent.com [155.35.41.137]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id HAA21597 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 1995 07:30:01 -0700 Received: by seaquest (5.x/SMI-SVR4(DEO-022095 Problems to obrien@sea.legent.com)) id AA04062; Tue, 11 Jul 1995 10:28:05 -0400 From: obrien@Sea.Legent.com (David O'Brien) Message-Id: <9507111428.AA04062@seaquest> Subject: Re: Dmitry Khrustalev: ports/609: tin cannot find sendmail and vi To: roberto@blaise.ibp.fr (Ollivier Robert) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 1995 10:28:04 -0400 (EDT) Cc: ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199507111202.OAA01852@blaise.ibp.fr> from "Ollivier Robert" at Jul 11, 95 02:02:01 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 PGP2] Content-Type: text Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > > > In addition to grep'ing for __NetBSD__ and adding __FreeBSD__ to the list > > (isn't there a common predefined symbol that could catch both??? how about > > adding __bsd4_4__ to both or something), screen.c needs a mod. > > To catch all of 4.4BSD derivative systems, use the GUIDELINES files : > > #if (defined(BSD) && (BSD >=199306)) > #endif > -- > Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@FreeBSD.ORG I thought that was the case, but following the man page for cpp(1) I ussued ``touch foo.h; cpp -dM foo.h''. This shows all the predefined macros and their values. I only got: #define __FreeBSD__ 2 #define i386 1 #define __GNUC__ 2 #define unix 1 I even tried ``gcc -E -dM foo.h'' and got: #define __FreeBSD__ 2 #define __i386__ 1 #define __i386 1 #define __GNUC_MINOR__ 6 #define i386 1 #define __unix 1 #define __unix__ 1 #define __GNUC__ 2 #define unix 1 I did wonder why I didn't get BSD defined. I looked at the source in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc and didn't find anything different. Am I missing something? -- David (obrien@sea.legent.com) From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Jul 11 07:37:33 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id HAA21742 for ports-outgoing; Tue, 11 Jul 1995 07:37:33 -0700 Received: from ibp.ibp.fr (ibp.ibp.fr [132.227.60.30]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id HAA21731 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 1995 07:37:21 -0700 Received: from blaise.ibp.fr (blaise.ibp.fr [132.227.60.1]) by ibp.ibp.fr (8.6.12/jtpda-5.0) with ESMTP id QAA10823 ; Tue, 11 Jul 1995 16:37:03 +0200 Received: from (roberto@localhost) by blaise.ibp.fr (8.6.12/jtpda-5.0) id QAA02947 ; Tue, 11 Jul 1995 16:36:56 +0200 From: roberto@blaise.ibp.fr (Ollivier Robert) Message-Id: <199507111436.QAA02947@blaise.ibp.fr> Subject: Re: Dmitry Khrustalev: ports/609: tin cannot find sendmail and vi To: obrien@Sea.Legent.com (David O'Brien) Date: Tue, 11 Jul 1995 16:36:55 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <9507111428.AA04062@seaquest> from "David O'Brien" at Jul 11, 95 10:28:04 am X-Operating-System: FreeBSD BUILT-19950501 ctm#617 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 321 Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > I did wonder why I didn't get BSD defined. I looked at the source in > /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc and didn't find anything different. Am I missing > something? sys/param.h -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD keltia 2.0-BUILT-19950503 #3: Wed May 3 19:53:04 MET DST 1995 From owner-freebsd-ports Tue Jul 11 21:24:57 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id VAA19719 for ports-outgoing; Tue, 11 Jul 1995 21:24:57 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id VAA19713 for ; Tue, 11 Jul 1995 21:24:55 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id VAA24348; Tue, 11 Jul 1995 21:24:27 -0700 Date: Tue, 11 Jul 1995 21:24:27 -0700 Message-Id: <199507120424.VAA24348@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: JKOKOT@demeter.ipan.lublin.pl CC: ports@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <3042CE7769F@demeter.ipan.lublin.pl> (JKOKOT@demeter.ipan.lublin.pl) Subject: Re: Radio port From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk * I uploaded updated port of radio-2.0.4 to * freebsd.cdrom.com/pub/FreeBSD/incoming/radio3.tgz * * Thanks to Bill Fenner for his help. Thanks, imported. Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jul 12 00:41:36 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id AAA23862 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 12 Jul 1995 00:41:36 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id AAA23855 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 1995 00:41:33 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id AAA05283; Wed, 12 Jul 1995 00:40:39 -0700 Date: Wed, 12 Jul 1995 00:40:39 -0700 Message-Id: <199507120740.AAA05283@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: obrien@Sea.Legent.com CC: ports@freebsd.org, Dmitry@Sea.Legent.com, Khrustalev@Sea.Legent.com, dima@satty.npi.msu.su In-reply-to: <9507110225.AA28809@seaquest> (obrien@Sea.Legent.com) Subject: Re: Dmitry Khrustalev: ports/609: tin cannot find sendmail and vi From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk * I would suggest working from the tin 1.30 beta rather than 1.22. As I wrote when I imported it, I will certainly be more than happy to have someone maintain the 1.30beta port. The only problem is that we need that "someone" to step up. :) Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jul 12 00:42:36 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id AAA23916 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 12 Jul 1995 00:42:36 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id AAA23910 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 1995 00:42:33 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id AAA05277; Wed, 12 Jul 1995 00:39:29 -0700 Date: Wed, 12 Jul 1995 00:39:29 -0700 Message-Id: <199507120739.AAA05277@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: jkh@time.cdrom.com CC: ports@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <1503.805413305@time.cdrom.com> (jkh@time.cdrom.com) Subject: Re: Dmitry Khrustalev: ports/609: tin cannot find sendmail and vi From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk * Does ports get this mail? It certainly should, IMNSHO.. That's right. Jordan, do you think it's possible to make all the PR's of category "ports" would go to the ports list too? Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jul 12 01:10:56 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id BAA25119 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 12 Jul 1995 01:10:56 -0700 Received: from eikon.regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de (eikon.regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de [129.187.42.3]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id BAA25105 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 1995 01:10:45 -0700 Received: from vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de ([129.187.142.36]) by eikon.regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de with SMTP id <55374>; Wed, 12 Jul 1995 10:09:33 +0200 Received: (from jhs@localhost) by vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de (8.6.11/8.6.9) id XAA26041 for ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 10 Jul 1995 23:14:57 +0200 Date: Mon, 10 Jul 1995 23:14:57 +0200 From: Julian Howard Stacey Message-Id: <199507102114.XAA26041@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: expect fails Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk with current src & ports: vector jhs csh ttyp2 1 % cd /usr/ports vector jhs csh ttyp2 2 % cd */expect vector jhs csh ttyp2 3 % make sx m===> expect-5.16 depends on shared library: tcl\.7\. - found ake instal===> expect-5.16 depends on shared library: tk\.3\. - found l Checksums OK. ===> Extracting for expect-5.16 ===> Patching for expect-5.16 ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for expect-5.16 ===> Configuring for expect-5.16 ....... cc -g -o expect exp_command.o expect.o pty_termios.o exp_inter.o exp_regexp.o exp_tty.o exp_log.o exp_main_sub.o exp_pty.o exp_printify.o exp_trap.o exp_console.o exp_strf.o exp_glob.o exp_win.o Dbg.o exp_clib.o exp_closetcl.o exp_memmove.o exp_main_exp.o exp_select.o ../tcl7.3/libtcl.a -lm ./exp_command.c:336: Undefined symbol `_Tcl_ResetResult' referenced from text segment ./exp_command.c:337: Undefined symbol `_Tcl_GetCommandInfo' referenced from text Julian S From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jul 12 01:35:10 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id BAA25791 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 12 Jul 1995 01:35:10 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id BAA25785 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 1995 01:35:08 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id BAA05551; Wed, 12 Jul 1995 01:34:58 -0700 Date: Wed, 12 Jul 1995 01:34:58 -0700 Message-Id: <199507120834.BAA05551@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: mantar@netcom.com CC: ports@freebsd.org In-reply-to: (message from Manfred Antar on Tue, 11 Jul 1995 09:23:52 -0700 (PDT)) Subject: Re: xscreensaver changes group From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk (Please send messages like this to "ports" Manfred....) * Date: Tue, 11 Jul 1995 09:23:52 -0700 (PDT) * From: Manfred Antar * * i just installed xscreensaver from current ports and all files in * /usr/X11R6/bin now belong to group dialer!! someone migt want to look * into this. This is totally new to me. It certainly doesn't happen here. Are you sure it's the xscreensaver port that's causing it? Can you change the group back and reinstall xscreensaver and send us an output of "script"? * ============================= * | mantar@netcom.com | * | Ph. (415) 647-4843 | * ============================= Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jul 12 01:51:55 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id BAA26649 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 12 Jul 1995 01:51:55 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id BAA26640 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 1995 01:51:48 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id BAA05601; Wed, 12 Jul 1995 01:51:38 -0700 Date: Wed, 12 Jul 1995 01:51:38 -0700 Message-Id: <199507120851.BAA05601@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com CC: ports@freebsd.org Subject: utils reorganization From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Hi Rod. Please make the following repository copies. The individual ports are to be copied from ports/utils if not specified otherwise. The necessary subdirectories are already created. ======= sysutils: top, tua, xbatt, xdu, xperfmon, xsysstats (from x11) benchmarks: bonnie, iozone, lmbench, tcpblast (from net) emulators: cpmtools (originally utils/cpm), hfs, mtools, pcemu, vmsbackup, wine security: pgp, pidentd (from net), tcp_wrapper (from net) ======= I'll update the Makefiles and modules and such after you're done, as well as deleting the originals. Thanks, Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jul 12 03:25:58 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id DAA29514 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 12 Jul 1995 03:25:58 -0700 Received: from eikon.regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de (root@eikon.regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de [129.187.42.3]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id DAA29476 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 1995 03:25:52 -0700 Received: from vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de ([129.187.142.36]) by eikon.regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de with SMTP id <55482>; Wed, 12 Jul 1995 12:24:24 +0200 Received: (from jhs@localhost) by vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de (8.6.11/8.6.9) id LAA09706 for ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 12 Jul 1995 11:49:14 +0200 Date: Wed, 12 Jul 1995 11:49:14 +0200 From: Julian Howard Stacey Message-Id: <199507120949.LAA09706@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: make fetch on freefall Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Would it be a good idea to run a regular automatic make fetch on freefall, then when other sites mirror the distfiles directory, they'd get all the newly incorporated extras too ? Some sites (such as the one I tape dump distfiles from once a week), don't generally run make fetch, as the mirror host doesnt run FreeBSD, but A-N-Other-UX-OS. Currently my distfiles/ off tape from that mirror always seesm to have a lot more missing than just the `LEGAL'-limited stuff, yet I know they mirror frequently. If we did this make fetch, we'd want to avoid distributing kermit etc. Julian S From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jul 12 03:47:48 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id DAA00528 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 12 Jul 1995 03:47:48 -0700 Received: from server.netcraft.co.uk (server.netcraft.co.uk [194.72.238.2]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id DAA00521 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 1995 03:47:45 -0700 Received: (from paul@localhost) by server.netcraft.co.uk (8.6.11/8.6.9) id LAA08381; Wed, 12 Jul 1995 11:47:45 +0100 From: Paul Richards Message-Id: <199507121047.LAA08381@server.netcraft.co.uk> Subject: Re: Dmitry Khrustalev: ports/609: tin cannot find sendmail and vi To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 1995 11:47:45 +0100 (BST) Cc: jkh@time.cdrom.com, ports@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199507120739.AAA05277@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> from "Satoshi Asami" at Jul 12, 95 00:39:29 am Reply-to: paul@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 1053 Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In reply to Satoshi Asami who said > > * Does ports get this mail? It certainly should, IMNSHO.. > > That's right. Jordan, do you think it's possible to make all the PR's > of category "ports" would go to the ports list too? Maybe a ports-bugs list would be more appropriate. If I send it to ports then I'd have to remove them from bugs otherwise some people will get duplicates which always causes lots of complaints. People who currently track bugs because they want to see *all* bug reports might not want to subscribe to ports and get all the added mail from it. I think there's good reasons to keep bugs separate from the other mailing lists. Anyway, let me know what you want and I'll set it up, probably not until next week though. Another Phd deadline this Friday and I'm taking a few days off to finish the next draft (hopefully the last one). -- Paul Richards, Bluebird Computer Systems. FreeBSD core team member. Internet: paul@FreeBSD.org, http://www.freebsd.org/~paul Phone: 0370 462071 (Mobile), +44 1222 457651 (home) From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jul 12 11:23:23 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id LAA14110 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 12 Jul 1995 11:23:23 -0700 Received: from gndrsh.aac.dev.com (gndrsh.aac.dev.com [198.145.92.241]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA14104 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 1995 11:23:19 -0700 Received: (from rgrimes@localhost) by gndrsh.aac.dev.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id LAA18219; Wed, 12 Jul 1995 11:23:14 -0700 From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <199507121823.LAA18219@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> Subject: Re: utils reorganization To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 1995 11:23:14 -0700 (PDT) Cc: ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199507120851.BAA05601@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> from "Satoshi Asami" at Jul 12, 95 01:51:38 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1336 Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > > Hi Rod. > > Please make the following repository copies. The individual ports are > to be copied from ports/utils if not specified otherwise. The > necessary subdirectories are already created. > A correction, and please, to make my life easier be accurate when suppling this type of info, I hate to dig for this stuff :-(. Also one item per line of the format: utils/top -> sysutils/top utils/tua -> sysutils/tua x11/xperfmon -> sysutils/xperfmon is much faster for me to deal with. This copy has now been completed, and I am off working on the sup targets. Please remeber to update the sample sup files in the share hierarchy. > ======= > sysutils: > > top, tua, xbatt, xdu, xperfmon, xsysstats (from x11) (top, tua, xbatt, xdu, xsysstats [from utils], xperfmon [from x11]) > benchmarks: > > bonnie, iozone, lmbench, tcpblast (from net) > > emulators: > > cpmtools (originally utils/cpm), hfs, mtools, pcemu, vmsbackup, wine > > security: > > pgp, pidentd (from net), tcp_wrapper (from net) > ======= > > I'll update the Makefiles and modules and such after you're done, as > well as deleting the originals. > > Thanks, > Satoshi > > Thanks, -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com Accurate Automation Company Reliable computers for FreeBSD From owner-freebsd-ports Wed Jul 12 16:52:15 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id QAA04624 for ports-outgoing; Wed, 12 Jul 1995 16:52:15 -0700 Received: from forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU (forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.33.75]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id QAA04618 for ; Wed, 12 Jul 1995 16:52:14 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id QAA23623; Wed, 12 Jul 1995 16:52:04 -0700 Date: Wed, 12 Jul 1995 16:52:04 -0700 Message-Id: <199507122352.QAA23623@forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU> To: rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com CC: ports@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <199507121823.LAA18219@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> (rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com) Subject: Re: utils reorganization From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk * A correction, and please, to make my life easier be accurate * when suppling this type of info, I hate to dig for this stuff :-(. Oops sorry, I copied over from my old mail to ports when I asked for approval, it was already wrong. ;) * Also one item per line of the format: * utils/top -> sysutils/top * utils/tua -> sysutils/tua * x11/xperfmon -> sysutils/xperfmon * * is much faster for me to deal with. Ok, next time I'll write it that way. * This copy has now been completed, and I am off working on the * sup targets. Please remeber to update the sample sup files in * the share hierarchy. Ok.... Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Jul 13 06:00:07 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id GAA05571 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 13 Jul 1995 06:00:07 -0700 Received: from irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de (irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de [141.76.1.11]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id FAA05548 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 1995 05:59:46 -0700 Received: from sax.sax.de by irz301.inf.tu-dresden.de with SMTP (5.67b+/DEC-Ultrix/4.3) id AA25402; Thu, 13 Jul 1995 14:59:11 +0200 Received: by sax.sax.de (8.6.12/8.6.12-s1) with UUCP id OAA00426; Thu, 13 Jul 1995 14:59:10 +0200 Received: (from j@localhost) by uriah.heep.sax.de (8.6.11/8.6.9) id PAA10502; Wed, 12 Jul 1995 15:18:28 +0200 From: J Wunsch Message-Id: <199507121318.PAA10502@uriah.heep.sax.de> Subject: Re: utils reorganization To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Date: Wed, 12 Jul 1995 15:18:28 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com, ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199507120851.BAA05601@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> from "Satoshi Asami" at Jul 12, 95 01:51:38 am Reply-To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) X-Phone: +49-351-2012 669 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 475 Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk As Satoshi Asami wrote: > > Hi Rod. > > Please make the following repository copies. The individual ports are > to be copied from ports/utils if not specified otherwise. The > necessary subdirectories are already created. > > ======= > sysutils: > > top, tua, xbatt, xdu, xperfmon, xsysstats (from x11) team (from utils)? -- cheers, J"org joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-) From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Jul 13 08:10:15 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id IAA11438 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 13 Jul 1995 08:10:15 -0700 Received: from emerald.oz.net (emerald.oz.net [198.68.184.2]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id IAA11431 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 1995 08:10:14 -0700 Received: from wsantee.oz.net by emerald.oz.net via ESMTP (8.6.12/930416.SGI) for id PAA15441; Thu, 13 Jul 1995 15:07:41 GMT Received: (from wsantee@localhost) by wsantee.oz.net (8.6.11/8.6.9) id IAA07994 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 13 Jul 1995 08:08:56 -0700 From: Wes Santee Message-Id: <199507131508.IAA07994@wsantee.oz.net> Subject: XPilot port To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 13 Jul 1995 08:08:55 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 601 Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk I whipped up an XPilot port last night, but I don't know who/where to send the files. It's not exactly a robust port, but it gets XPilot on your machine and working. I'll probably need to create a configure script for it as the default installation leaves you to edit the configuration files yourself. Cheers, -- ( -Wes Santee | You're never dead 'til you're ) ( wsantee@wsantee.oz.net | out of quarters. --InSoc ) ( http://www.oz.net/~wsantee \------------------------------ ) ( O S / 2 W A R P F r e e B S D ) From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Jul 13 14:46:46 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id OAA29018 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 13 Jul 1995 14:46:46 -0700 Received: from salyko.cube.net (root@salyko.cube.net [193.141.73.2]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id OAA29012 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 1995 14:46:42 -0700 Received: from nasim.nasim.cube.net by salyko.cube.net with smtp (Smail3.1.29.1 #1) id m0sWW5Y-0016C8C; Thu, 13 Jul 95 23:46 MET DST Received: by nasim.nasim.cube.net (Smail3.1.29.0 #1) id m0sWW55-0007ZZC; Thu, 13 Jul 95 23:46 MET DST To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Path: not-for-mail From: knarf@nasim.cube.net (Frank Bartels) Newsgroups: muc.lists.freebsd.ports Subject: diffs and checksums Date: 13 Jul 1995 23:46:00 +0200 Organization: The Sunsite for ATARI-Friends Lines: 19 Message-ID: <3u446o$oih@nasim.nasim.cube.net> X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Hi! I always wondered why all the patches are context and not unified diffs. Unified diffs are much more readable and easier to edit. I always read the diffs before doing the make and I sometimes disagree with some (configuration) settings and want to edit the patches. It also would be a good idea to have an additional md5 file for the _uncompressed_ original archive. I really *hate* compress (.Z) and I always do a znew on these files but this leads into checksum mismatch. I usually get the distfiles from my own public archive and it would be nice to look for .tar.gz if EXTRACT_SUFX is .tar.Z and then check something like files/tar.md5 instead of files/md5. Bye, Knarf -- Frank Bartels | UUCP/ZModem/Fax: + 49 89 5469593 | MiNT is knarf@nasim.cube.net | Login: nuucp Index: /pub/ls-lR.nasim.gz | Now TOS! From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Jul 13 16:00:49 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id QAA01889 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 13 Jul 1995 16:00:49 -0700 Received: from sequent.kiae.su (sequent.kiae.su [144.206.136.6]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id QAA01883 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 1995 16:00:39 -0700 Received: by sequent.kiae.su id AA18682 (5.65.kiae-2 ); Fri, 14 Jul 1995 02:45:52 +0400 Received: by sequent.KIAE.su (UUMAIL/2.0); Fri, 14 Jul 95 02:45:51 +0400 Received: (from ache@localhost) by astral.msk.su (8.6.8/8.6.6) id CAA01362; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 02:32:16 +0400 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Frank Bartels References: <3u446o$oih@nasim.nasim.cube.net> In-Reply-To: <3u446o$oih@nasim.nasim.cube.net>; from Frank Bartels at 13 Jul 1995 23:46:00 +0200 Message-Id: Organization: Olahm Ha-Yetzirah Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 02:32:15 +0400 (MSD) X-Mailer: Mail/@ [v2.40 FreeBSD] From: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= aka "Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage" X-Class: Fast Subject: Re: diffs and checksums Lines: 18 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 917 Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk In message <3u446o$oih@nasim.nasim.cube.net> Frank Bartels writes: >I always wondered why all the patches are context and not unified >diffs. Unified diffs are much more readable and easier to edit. I >always read the diffs before doing the make and I sometimes disagree >with some (configuration) settings and want to edit the patches. I always wondered why some of the patches are unified and not context diffs. Context diffs are much more readable for human eye. I always read the diffs before doing the make and I sometimes disagree with some (configuration) settings, unified diffs makes this task more difficult. -- Andrey A. Chernov : And I rest so composedly, /Now, in my bed, ache@astral.msk.su : That any beholder /Might fancy me dead - FidoNet: 2:5020/230.3 : Might start at beholding me, /Thinking me dead. RELCOM Team,FreeBSD Team : E.A.Poe From "For Annie" 1849 From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Jul 13 16:52:55 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id QAA05644 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 13 Jul 1995 16:52:55 -0700 Received: from palmer.demon.co.uk (palmer.demon.co.uk [158.152.50.150]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id QAA05630 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 1995 16:52:50 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by palmer.demon.co.uk (8.6.11/8.6.11) with SMTP id AAA01225 ; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 00:51:59 +0100 X-Authentication-Warning: palmer.demon.co.uk: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: Frank Bartels cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: diffs and checksums In-reply-to: Your message of "13 Jul 1995 23:46:00 +0200." <3u446o$oih@nasim.nasim.cube.net> Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 00:51:56 +0100 Message-ID: <1223.805679516@palmer.demon.co.uk> From: Gary Palmer Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk In message <3u446o$oih@nasim.nasim.cube.net>, Frank Bartels writes: >Hi! > >I always wondered why all the patches are context and not unified >diffs. Unified diffs are much more readable and easier to edit. I >always read the diffs before doing the make and I sometimes disagree >with some (configuration) settings and want to edit the patches. The type of diff supplied in a port is extremely dependant on the person doing the port - I prefer context diffs, and tend to use them, even if I am working on an existing port which uses a different diff format - I find context diffs a lot easier for ports as you get a better idea of what is actually being changed as you have the context of the patch... >It also would be a good idea to have an additional md5 file for the >_uncompressed_ original archive. I really *hate* compress (.Z) and I >always do a znew on these files but this leads into checksum mismatch. >I usually get the distfiles from my own public archive and it would be >nice to look for .tar.gz if EXTRACT_SUFX is .tar.Z and then check >something like files/tar.md5 instead of files/md5. Seeing as the plain tar file is never seen by the ports mechanism, you are suggesting we add another step? Currently we go straight from the tarball to the extracted source, so there is no real way to check the md5 of the tar file. Also, if the file starts as a .Z, you do a znew, surely you get a file with a .gz extension? That shouldn't produce a checksum mismatch, you should be told that it can't find a checksum to match against that file (I can't remember what it says, but it's not a checksum mismatch!) Gary From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Jul 13 17:20:25 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id RAA07088 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 13 Jul 1995 17:20:25 -0700 Received: from forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU (forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.33.75]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id RAA07082 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 1995 17:20:24 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id RAA25092; Thu, 13 Jul 1995 17:20:08 -0700 Date: Thu, 13 Jul 1995 17:20:08 -0700 Message-Id: <199507140020.RAA25092@forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU> To: gary@palmer.demon.co.uk CC: knarf@nasim.cube.net, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <1223.805679516@palmer.demon.co.uk> (message from Gary Palmer on Fri, 14 Jul 1995 00:51:56 +0100) Subject: Re: diffs and checksums From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk * The type of diff supplied in a port is extremely dependant on the * person doing the port - I prefer context diffs, and tend to use them, * even if I am working on an existing port which uses a different diff * format - I find context diffs a lot easier for ports as you get a * better idea of what is actually being changed as you have the context * of the patch... Well, it's a matter of preference. I prefer -u diffs, I usually find them easier to read than -c diffs. :) * >It also would be a good idea to have an additional md5 file for the * >_uncompressed_ original archive. I really *hate* compress (.Z) and I * >always do a znew on these files but this leads into checksum mismatch. * >I usually get the distfiles from my own public archive and it would be * >nice to look for .tar.gz if EXTRACT_SUFX is .tar.Z and then check * >something like files/tar.md5 instead of files/md5. Something like this was brought up by Torsten to me before, I think it will be great if we can somehow let the checksum ignore the difference is compression formats. Since some master sites already do recompression, this will free us from some of the "checksum mismatch" errors (note that they can have the same filename (with .gz suffix) and still have different checksums). Also, we should be able to save space on wcarchive (and mirror sites) by doing znew --best on all the distfiles. The only problem is, how? I couldn't come up with a way to implement this without having to gzcat the file every time a user types "make " ('cause most of the targets depend on "checksum"), or forcing a znew from bsd.port.mk. Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Jul 13 17:32:12 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id RAA07469 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 13 Jul 1995 17:32:12 -0700 Received: from salyko.cube.net (root@salyko.cube.net [193.141.73.2]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id RAA07461 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 1995 17:32:09 -0700 Received: from nasim.nasim.cube.net by salyko.cube.net with smtp (Smail3.1.29.1 #1) id m0sWYfg-0016DEC; Fri, 14 Jul 95 02:32 MET DST Received: by nasim.nasim.cube.net (Smail3.1.29.0 #1) id m0sWYfY-0007ZkC; Fri, 14 Jul 95 02:31 MET DST To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Path: not-for-mail From: knarf@nasim.cube.net (Frank Bartels) Newsgroups: muc.lists.freebsd.ports Subject: Re: diffs and checksums Date: 14 Jul 1995 02:31:50 +0200 Organization: The Sunsite for ATARI-Friends Lines: 60 Message-ID: <3u4dtm$rt5@nasim.nasim.cube.net> References: <3u446o$oih@nasim.nasim.cube.net> <1223.805679516@palmer.demon.co.uk> X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Gary Palmer (gary@palmer.demon.co.uk) wrote: > In message <3u446o$oih@nasim.nasim.cube.net>, Frank Bartels writes: > The type of diff supplied in a port is extremely dependant on the > person doing the port Oh, I did not know this, I always thought only context diffs are accepted. > - I prefer context diffs, and tend to use them, > even if I am working on an existing port which uses a different diff > format - I find context diffs a lot easier for ports as you get a > better idea of what is actually being changed as you have the context > of the patch... Huh? With unified diffs you also have the context of the patch. And I get a *much* better idea of what has changed, because the original and the modified lines follow immediateley and not many lines later. Also with the `+' and `-' lines I always see what is added and removed. With the `!' I always ask me if this is the original or modified line. Small example (less-290): --- Makefile.in.orig Mon Mar 13 22:41:54 1995 +++ Makefile.in Fri Jul 14 02:17:15 1995 @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ LDFLAGS = @LDFLAGS@ O=o -LIBS = @LIBS@ +LIBS = -ltermcap prefix = @prefix@ exec_prefix = @exec_prefix@ The context is present and please don't tell me you don't see on the first view what is changed. ;) BTW: Unified diffs are much smaller as they don't contain the context twice (this is why the format is called "unified context diff" - see patch(1)). > Seeing as the plain tar file is never seen by the ports mechanism, you > are suggesting we add another step? Currently we go straight from the > tarball to the extracted source, so there is no real way to check the > md5 of the tar file. zcat during the checksum check would do the trick. > Also, if the file starts as a .Z, you do a znew, surely you get a file > with a .gz extension? That shouldn't produce a checksum mismatch, you > should be told that it can't find a checksum to match against that > file (I can't remember what it says, but it's not a checksum > mismatch!) Sure, I either have to modify the Makefile or link the .gz -> .Z. Bye, Knarf -- Frank Bartels | UUCP/ZModem/Fax: + 49 89 5469593 | MiNT is knarf@nasim.cube.net | Login: nuucp Index: /pub/ls-lR.nasim.gz | Now TOS! From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Jul 13 17:49:09 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id RAA07934 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 13 Jul 1995 17:49:09 -0700 Received: from salyko.cube.net (root@salyko.cube.net [193.141.73.2]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id RAA07928 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 1995 17:49:06 -0700 Received: from nasim.nasim.cube.net by salyko.cube.net with smtp (Smail3.1.29.1 #1) id m0sWYw6-0016DEC; Fri, 14 Jul 95 02:48 MET DST Received: by nasim.nasim.cube.net (Smail3.1.29.0 #1) id m0sWYvx-0007ZkC; Fri, 14 Jul 95 02:48 MET DST To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Path: not-for-mail From: knarf@nasim.cube.net (Frank Bartels) Newsgroups: muc.lists.freebsd.ports Subject: Re: diffs and checksums Date: 14 Jul 1995 02:48:46 +0200 Organization: The Sunsite for ATARI-Friends Lines: 28 Message-ID: <3u4ete$shi@nasim.nasim.cube.net> References: <1223.805679516@palmer.demon.co.uk> <199507140020.RAA25092@forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU> X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2] Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Satoshi Asami (asami@cs.berkeley.edu) wrote: > Well, it's a matter of preference. I prefer -u diffs, I usually find > them easier to read than -c diffs. :) Ahh! ;)) > Also, we should be able to save space on wcarchive (and mirror sites) > by doing znew --best on all the distfiles. I don't think it's worth the CPU usage using --best. But let us discuss this later. ;) > The only problem is, how? I couldn't come up with a way to implement > this without having to gzcat the file every time a user types "make > " ('cause most of the targets depend on "checksum"), or > forcing a znew from bsd.port.mk. Something like work/.checksum.done would cure this problem, wouldn't it? Hmm, work/ may not exist at this time, then what about distfiles/.filename.ok ? Again a bad idea if someone mirrores these files. Create the work directory with the ckecksum target? Bye, Knarf -- Frank Bartels | UUCP/ZModem/Fax: + 49 89 5469593 | MiNT is knarf@nasim.cube.net | Login: nuucp Index: /pub/ls-lR.nasim.gz | Now TOS! From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Jul 13 18:13:18 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id SAA08687 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 13 Jul 1995 18:13:18 -0700 Received: from forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU (forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.33.75]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id SAA08681 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 1995 18:13:17 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id SAA25137; Thu, 13 Jul 1995 18:13:12 -0700 Date: Thu, 13 Jul 1995 18:13:12 -0700 Message-Id: <199507140113.SAA25137@forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU> To: knarf@nasim.cube.net CC: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <3u4dtm$rt5@nasim.nasim.cube.net> (knarf@nasim.cube.net) Subject: Re: diffs and checksums From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk * Oh, I did not know this, I always thought only context diffs are * accepted. That's certainly not true, all the ports *I* did use -u diffs.... :) * The context is present and please don't tell me you don't see on the * first view what is changed. ;) BTW: Unified diffs are much smaller as * they don't contain the context twice (this is why the format is called * "unified context diff" - see patch(1)). That's true, and it's why I like -u diffs. But they can also do things like (from utils/chord) @@ -46,13 +46,14 @@ toc.o : chord.h install : all - cp $(PROGRAMS) $(BINDIR) - rm -f $(MANDIR)/cat$(MANEXT)/chord.$(MANEXT) + install -c -s $(PROGRAMS) $(BINDIR) cp chord.man $(MANDIR)/man$(MANEXT)/chord.$(MANEXT) - chmod 666 $(MANDIR)/man$(MANEXT)/chord.$(MANEXT) - Cp a2crd.man $(MANDIR)/man$(MANEXT)/a2crd.$(MANEXT) - chmod 666 $(MANDIR)/man$(MANEXT)/a2crd.$(MANEXT) - + chmod 444 $(MANDIR)/man$(MANEXT)/chord.$(MANEXT) + gzip -9nf $(MANDIR)/man$(MANEXT)/chord.$(MANEXT) + cp a2crd.man $(MANDIR)/man$(MANEXT)/a2crd.$(MANEXT) + chmod 444 $(MANDIR)/man$(MANEXT)/a2crd.$(MANEXT) + gzip -9nf $(MANDIR)/man$(MANEXT)/a2crd.$(MANEXT) + shar : $(SRC) rm -f $(RELNAME).part* shar -F -L 60 -o $(RELNAME).part $(SRC) $(INCL) $(SONGS) $(DOCS) which requires a little imagination. A -c diff would have been easier to read in this case. Anyway, we are not going to force people to use one format of the other, it's just a matter of preference and we should all accept that some people are born with different kind of circuits in their brains. :) Satoshi P.S. By the way, is there some way to convert a -u diff to -c or vice versa? I took a look at man pages of diff and patch, but couldn't find anything.... From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Jul 13 18:37:13 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id SAA09223 for ports-outgoing; Thu, 13 Jul 1995 18:37:13 -0700 Received: from gndrsh.aac.dev.com (gndrsh.aac.dev.com [198.145.92.241]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id SAA09216 for ; Thu, 13 Jul 1995 18:37:09 -0700 Received: (from rgrimes@localhost) by gndrsh.aac.dev.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id SAA29557; Thu, 13 Jul 1995 18:36:54 -0700 From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <199507140136.SAA29557@gndrsh.aac.dev.com> Subject: Re: diffs and checksums To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Date: Thu, 13 Jul 1995 18:36:54 -0700 (PDT) Cc: knarf@nasim.cube.net, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199507140113.SAA25137@forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU> from "Satoshi Asami" at Jul 13, 95 06:13:12 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1812 Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk ... > Satoshi > > P.S. By the way, is there some way to convert a -u diff to -c or vice > versa? I took a look at man pages of diff and patch, but > couldn't find anything.... patch < unidiff; diff -c original new :-), gross, but what I do when I have one format that does not make a whole lot of since and want to look at in the other format to see if that makes more since to me. Unlike the strongly sided one way or the other folks here I like that there are both formats, some changes present themselves much clearer in one format than the other. I tend to use the one that makes the patch as obvious as possible. One bugger in diff -c is that it gets confused some time and produces junk like alah alah alah ! blah blah blah clah clah clah ---- alah alah alah ! blah blah blah ! dlah dlah dlah ! elah elah elah clah clah clah It usually does this when there is a blank line near the change, which in a lot of C code is a quite common thing :-(. Now if you want something really horrible to read, try the diff -an that RCS uses to store deltas, BLEHH! But, compact! Perhaps there is the answer to Satoshi's conversion problem, as rcs actuall stores diff -an, but can produce either diff -c or diff -u, but I it does this by creating the two versions of the files using back walking diff -an down the versions, and then does the proper diff on the 2 tmp files. Another way to do what I did above using rcs would be: ci file co -l file patch ; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 03:00:44 -0700 Received: (from thomas@localhost) by ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de (8.6.11/8.6.9) id LAA15060; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 11:59:52 +0200 From: Thomas Gellekum Message-Id: <199507140959.LAA15060@ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de> Subject: Re: problem building lang/icon on 2.0.5R To: thomas@ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de (thomas) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 11:59:52 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: from "thomas" at Jul 5, 95 06:13:39 pm Organization: Institut f. Hochfrequenztechnik, RWTH Aachen X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 843 Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk I wrote: > > Moin, > > Could somebody please verify the build of lang/icon on a 2.0.5R > system? I get the following error somewhere down the building > process: [...] > make db_lib > rm -f rt.db rt.a > ../../bin/rtt cnv.r data.r def.r errmsg.r fconv.r fload.r fmath.r fmisc.r fmonitr.r fscan.r fstr.r fstranl.r fstruct.r fsys.r fwindow.r init.r invoke.r keyword.r lmisc.r oarith.r oasgn.r ocat.r ocomp.r omisc.r oref.r oset.r ovalue.r ralc.r rcoexpr.r rcomp.r rdebug.r rlrgint.r rlocal.r rmemmgt.r rmisc.r rstruct.r rsys.r rwinrsc.r rgfxsys.r rwinsys.r rwindow.r fxtra.r > rtt: File fmisc.r; Line 0: invalid character: > *** Error code 1 > [more Error code 1 and exit stage left] More data: make runs fine if my login shell is tcsh. Normally, I use pdksh and _did_ use pdksh on 2.0 as a login shell when I ported icon. Any ideas? tg From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Jul 14 05:28:08 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id FAA06972 for ports-outgoing; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 05:28:08 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id FAA06964 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 05:28:05 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id FAA11512; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 05:25:15 -0700 Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 05:25:15 -0700 Message-Id: <199507141225.FAA11512@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: thomas@ghpc8.ihf.rwth-aachen.de CC: thomas@ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de, ports@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <199507140959.LAA15060@ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de> (message from Thomas Gellekum on Fri, 14 Jul 1995 11:59:52 +0200 (MET DST)) Subject: Re: problem building lang/icon on 2.0.5R From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk * More data: make runs fine if my login shell is tcsh. Normally, I * use pdksh and _did_ use pdksh on 2.0 as a login shell when I ported * icon. I just tried it on thud, it built fine both with bash and ksh, although I didn't change my login shell to either. I'll try changing the shell tomorrow. By the way, thud is running (what is belived to be pretty close to) 2.0.5R. Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Jul 14 05:52:26 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id FAA07868 for ports-outgoing; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 05:52:26 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id FAA07861 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 05:52:24 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id FAA00857; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 05:52:14 -0700 Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 05:52:14 -0700 Message-Id: <199507141252.FAA00857@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: jleppek@suw2k.ess.harris.com CC: freebsd-current@freefall.cdrom.com, ports@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <9507141235.AA03475@borg.ess.harris.com> (jleppek@suw2k.ess.harris.com) Subject: Re: current breaks 2.0.5 binary From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk (Note crosspost, followup to "current" or "ports" depending on what your comment is about) * I just did a make world after a july 14 sup and now top is broken. * What was changed to break a 2.0.5 (622 snap) binary? * Are there any other binaries that are now broken and I should rebuild? I'm only aware of "top" (it was mentioned in David's commit message) from the ports tree, if someone knows of something else, please let me know. I made a copy of the top package with the name "top-3.3-stable" on the ftp site, so that when we rebuild the package, it won't get overwritten. I've also made a mental note to use that package for the 2.1 ports tree. By the way, I recompiled top on my machine (with the new kernel), and now I get this: ======= >> top kvm_open: proc size mismatch (35520 total, 620 chunks) top: Out of memory. ======= Do we need an additional patch? Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Jul 14 07:41:07 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id HAA11538 for ports-outgoing; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 07:41:07 -0700 Received: from wc.cdrom.com (wc.cdrom.com [192.216.223.37]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id HAA11488 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 07:40:57 -0700 Received: from who.cdrom.com (who-internal.cdrom.com [192.216.223.34]) by wc.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.12) with ESMTP id HAA20092 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 07:27:23 -0700 Received: from Root.COM (implode.Root.COM [198.145.90.1]) by who.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.11) with ESMTP id HAA16113 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 07:27:19 -0700 Received: from corbin.Root.COM (corbin [198.145.90.18]) by Root.COM (8.6.11/8.6.5) with ESMTP id HAA11860; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 07:25:38 -0700 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corbin.Root.COM (8.6.11/8.6.5) with SMTP id HAA00160; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 07:26:42 -0700 Message-Id: <199507141426.HAA00160@corbin.Root.COM> To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) cc: jleppek@suw2k.ess.harris.com, freebsd-current@freefall.cdrom.com, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: current breaks 2.0.5 binary In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 14 Jul 95 05:52:14 PDT." <199507141252.FAA00857@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> From: David Greenman Reply-To: davidg@Root.COM Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 07:26:37 -0700 Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk >By the way, I recompiled top on my machine (with the new kernel), and >now I get this: > >======= >>> top >kvm_open: proc size mismatch (35520 total, 620 chunks) >top: Out of memory. >======= > >Do we need an additional patch? No. I did mention, however, that libkvm must be rebuilt: " NOTE: libkvm, w, ps, 'top', and any other utility which depends on struct proc or any VM system structure will have to be rebuilt!!! " People need to be more aware about how to deal with these kinds of problems; there are a great many changes that are going to be made in the future to the 2.2 kernel that will cause even worse problems then this last round of changes. It's important for people who wish to run -current to know how to deal with things like "ps" not working as expected. Further, it is *escential* that you be sure to keep your LKMs up to date (even when you don't think you are or will be using them). There are going to be many significant changes to the FS layers that will make old LKMs not work and using them will kill your system. -DG From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Jul 14 10:18:13 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id KAA18834 for ports-outgoing; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 10:18:13 -0700 Received: from Glock.COM (root@glock.com [198.82.228.165]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA18824 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 10:18:10 -0700 Received: (from mmead@localhost) by Glock.COM (8.6.11/8.6.9) id NAA22421; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 13:21:57 -0400 Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 13:21:57 -0400 From: "matthew c. mead" Message-Id: <199507141721.NAA22421@Glock.COM> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: screen 3.6.2 backspace/delete problems Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk I've tried installing the screen 3.6.2 package twice now by building it from scratch on my system in /usr/ports. The problem I'm having with it is it does not behave as it used to when I built it without a port. I have my backspace key sending delete (^?) via xmodmap, yet when I'm in screen, an ^H always arrives at the shell (ie, if I do ^V I get ^H instead of the normal ^? I get when I'm not in screen). Anyone know why? Thanks for any help! -matt -- Matthew C. Mead | Network Administration: Virginia Tech Center for | Transportation Research -> mmead@ctr.vt.edu mmead@Glock.COM | Network Administration and Software Development http://www.Glock.COM/~mmead/ | Consulting: BizNet Technologies -> mmead@bnt.com From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Jul 14 10:26:48 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id KAA19332 for ports-outgoing; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 10:26:48 -0700 Received: from disperse.demon.co.uk (disperse.demon.co.uk [158.152.1.77]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id KAA19324 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 10:26:46 -0700 Received: from post.demon.co.uk by disperse.demon.co.uk id aa08431; 14 Jul 95 16:50 +0100 Received: from gnome.demon.co.uk by post.demon.co.uk id aa23467; 14 Jul 95 16:50 +0100 Received: (from jacs@localhost) by hawk.gnome.co.uk (8.6.11/8.6.9) id QAA04877 for ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 16:49:30 +0100 Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 16:49:30 +0100 From: Chris Stenton Message-Id: <199507141549.QAA04877@hawk.gnome.co.uk> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: ports index checker needed Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Hi, I am after a script that checks /usr/ports/INDEX against "ls /var/db/pkg" and informs the user which installed packages have been updated in the ports tree. I only pull over a copy of the ports tree once a month and its a pain to check which of my installed ports have been updated. If someone does have something then can they e-mail it to me as I don't take this list. If not I'll add it to my list of things to do. Chris From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Jul 14 11:30:15 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id LAA22132 for ports-outgoing; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 11:30:15 -0700 Received: from quirk.com (root@quirk.com [198.82.204.56]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id LAA22126 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 11:30:13 -0700 Received: (from cstruble@localhost) by quirk.com (8.6.11/8.6.9) id OAA00672; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 14:30:10 -0400 Message-Id: <199507141830.OAA00672@quirk.com> Subject: Re: ports/616: make install target in ports ignores NO_PACKAGE To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 14:30:10 -0400 (EDT) Cc: ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199507141247.FAA00639@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> from "Satoshi Asami" at Jul 14, 95 05:47:30 am From: cstruble@vt.edu Reply-To: cstruble@vt.edu X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1150 Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > NO_PACKAGE is meant for ports that we can't distribute binary packages > due to some restriction (export law, licensing, etc.). The fake-pkg > target, on the other hand, registers the port you just installed on > YOUR system, and there is no reason why NO_PACKAGE should preclude it. Yes, but what if I don't want the information registered? Or for example, I'm testing a port build and install without packaging information available? The make complains and dies with an error. Earlier versions of the bsd.port.mk files honored the NO_PACKAGE for installs. At least, it did for pre-2.0.5 SNAPS (I distinctly remember doing this for a few ports I grabbed off the FTP site because the package commands failed). Should there be a new variable? I don't think it's necessary, but at least give me some way of telling the system I don't want package information installed. See ya later, Craig -- Craig Struble - Grad Student, Consultant, | World's most versatile C program Student ACM Co-President, Virginia Tech | (*nix version) Email - cstruble@vt.edu | URL - http://acm.vt.edu/~cstruble/ | #include "/dev/tty" From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Jul 14 12:49:43 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id MAA24432 for ports-outgoing; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 12:49:43 -0700 Received: from sequent.kiae.su (sequent.kiae.su [144.206.136.6]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id MAA24426 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 12:49:37 -0700 Received: by sequent.kiae.su id AA23520 (5.65.kiae-2 ); Fri, 14 Jul 1995 23:25:34 +0400 Received: by sequent.KIAE.su (UUMAIL/2.0); Fri, 14 Jul 95 23:25:34 +0400 Received: (from ache@localhost) by astral.msk.su (8.6.8/8.6.6) id XAA00865; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 23:24:48 +0400 To: Satoshi Asami , cstruble@vt.edu Cc: ports@freebsd.org References: <199507141830.OAA00672@quirk.com> In-Reply-To: <199507141830.OAA00672@quirk.com>; from "cstruble@vt.edu" at Fri, 14 Jul 1995 14:30:10 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: Organization: Olahm Ha-Yetzirah Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 23:24:48 +0400 (MSD) X-Mailer: Mail/@ [v2.40 FreeBSD] From: =?KOI8-R?Q?=E1=CE=C4=D2=C5=CA_=FE=C5=D2=CE=CF=D7?= aka "Andrey A. Chernov, Black Mage" X-Class: Fast Subject: Re: ports/616: make install target in ports ignores NO_PACKAGE Lines: 19 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 876 Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk In message <199507141830.OAA00672@quirk.com> cstruble@vt.edu writes: >> NO_PACKAGE is meant for ports that we can't distribute binary packages >> due to some restriction (export law, licensing, etc.). The fake-pkg >> target, on the other hand, registers the port you just installed on >> YOUR system, and there is no reason why NO_PACKAGE should preclude it. >Yes, but what if I don't want the information registered? Or for example, ... >Should there be a new variable? I don't think it's necessary, but at least ... I think we need new NO_REGISTER variable for this purposes. -- Andrey A. Chernov : And I rest so composedly, /Now, in my bed, ache@astral.msk.su : That any beholder /Might fancy me dead - FidoNet: 2:5020/230.3 : Might start at beholding me, /Thinking me dead. RELCOM Team,FreeBSD Team : E.A.Poe From "For Annie" 1849 From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Jul 14 14:07:12 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id OAA26637 for ports-outgoing; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 14:07:12 -0700 Received: from salyko.cube.net (root@salyko.cube.net [193.141.73.2]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id OAA26624 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 14:07:04 -0700 Received: from nasim.nasim.cube.net by salyko.cube.net with smtp (Smail3.1.29.1 #1) id m0sWrwe-001675C; Fri, 14 Jul 95 23:06 MET DST Received: by nasim.nasim.cube.net (Smail3.1.29.0 #1) id m0sWrwX-0007PzC; Fri, 14 Jul 95 23:06 MET DST To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Path: not-for-mail From: knarf@nasim.cube.net (Frank Bartels) Newsgroups: muc.lists.freebsd.ports Subject: Re: screen 3.6.2 backspace/delete problems Date: 14 Jul 1995 23:06:38 +0200 Organization: The Sunsite for ATARI-Friends Lines: 17 Message-ID: <3u6m8u$s46@nasim.nasim.cube.net> References: <199507141721.NAA22421@Glock.COM> X-Newsreader: TIN [UNIX 1.3 950621BETA PL0] Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk matthew c. mead (mmead@glock.com) wrote: > I've tried installing the screen 3.6.2 package twice now by > building it from scratch on my system in /usr/ports. The problem I'm > having with it is it does not behave as it used to when I built it without > a port. I have my backspace key sending delete (^?) via xmodmap, yet when > I'm in screen, an ^H always arrives at the shell (ie, if I do ^V > I get ^H instead of the normal ^? I get when I'm not in screen). Anyone > know why? Thanks for any help! It has something to do with /usr/local/etc/screenrc, but I cannot see what causes the problem. If I remove this file, I get ^? as backspace. Bye, Knarf -- Frank Bartels | UUCP/ZModem/Fax: + 49 89 5469593 | MiNT is knarf@nasim.cube.net | Login: nuucp Index: /pub/ls-lR.nasim.gz | Now TOS! From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Jul 14 15:04:26 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id PAA03150 for ports-outgoing; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 15:04:26 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id PAA03140 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 15:04:15 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id PAA29276; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 15:04:07 -0700 Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 15:04:07 -0700 Message-Id: <199507142204.PAA29276@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: cstruble@vt.edu CC: ports@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <199507141830.OAA00672@quirk.com> (cstruble@vt.edu) Subject: Re: ports/616: make install target in ports ignores NO_PACKAGE From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk * Yes, but what if I don't want the information registered? Or for example, * I'm testing a port build and install without packaging information * available? The make complains and dies with an error. Earlier versions * of the bsd.port.mk files honored the NO_PACKAGE for installs. At least, * it did for pre-2.0.5 SNAPS (I distinctly remember doing this for a * few ports I grabbed off the FTP site because the package commands failed). That was considered a mistake. I didn't know there was somebody who liked the old behavior. ;) * Should there be a new variable? I don't think it's necessary, but at least * give me some way of telling the system I don't want package information * installed. Well, we can have variables for everything but for this particular one, I don't see the need to add yet another variable to the already congested bsd.port.mk. You can do "make -i install" if you are just testing, I think that's good enough. Remember, not having pkg/* files is not allowed for any port (NO_PACKAGE or not), so those ports are broken and have to be fixed. And for testing broken ports, we usually recommend "make -i". :) Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Jul 14 16:14:18 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id QAA04521 for ports-outgoing; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 16:14:18 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id QAA04510 ; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 16:14:14 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id QAA15602; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 16:14:05 -0700 Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 16:14:05 -0700 Message-Id: <199507142314.QAA15602@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: davidg@Root.COM CC: jleppek@suw2k.ess.harris.com, freebsd-current@freefall.cdrom.com, ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <199507141426.HAA00160@corbin.Root.COM> (message from David Greenman on Fri, 14 Jul 1995 07:26:37 -0700) Subject: Re: current breaks 2.0.5 binary From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk * No. I did mention, however, that libkvm must be rebuilt: Oh, that's right. Sorry about that, I recompiled top after a make world (which rebuilds libkvm), and it now works fine. Thanks. Ports people: top-3.3.tgz on ftp.freebsd.org is the new top, and top-3.3-stable.tgz is the old one that should work on the 2.1 ("stable") -current. Satoshi P.S. Does the "freebsd-stable" mailing list exist now? I saw .info files and such on freefall but nothing in the archive...well, this may be the first message. :) From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Jul 14 16:50:56 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id QAA05313 for ports-outgoing; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 16:50:56 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id QAA05294 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 16:50:48 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id QAA15744; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 16:50:38 -0700 Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 16:50:38 -0700 Message-Id: <199507142350.QAA15744@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: knarf@nasim.cube.net CC: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <3u4ete$shi@nasim.nasim.cube.net> (knarf@nasim.cube.net) Subject: Re: diffs and checksums From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk * > Also, we should be able to save space on wcarchive (and mirror sites) * > by doing znew --best on all the distfiles. * * I don't think it's worth the CPU usage using --best. But let us discuss * this later. ;) I mean we put tarfiles that have been znew --best'd on wcarchive, and every mirror site will pick them up. So the CPU is used only on one site (probably thud), and all the mirror sites can save space. How's that now? :) * > The only problem is, how? I couldn't come up with a way to implement * > this without having to gzcat the file every time a user types "make * > " ('cause most of the targets depend on "checksum"), or * > forcing a znew from bsd.port.mk. * * Something like work/.checksum.done would cure this problem, wouldn't * it? Hmm, work/ may not exist at this time, then what about * distfiles/.filename.ok ? Again a bad idea if someone mirrores these * files. Create the work directory with the ckecksum target? Um, you are confusing yourself here. Why would someone mirror a file like that unless I screw up and put that (as well as the distfiles) on wcarchive? ;) Anyway, the problem is that the tarfile may have changed without a name change (that's really the whole point of checksumming). Having a cookie won't really help alleviate this problem, because it won't guarantee anything except that the checksum was once correct. Think of this sequence: (1) Joe user sups ports/games/coolgame (2) Joe user does a make, it fetches the tarfile, checksum is ok and builds the cool game (3) Joe user sups ports/games/coolgame again (probably a nightly sup), the original file has changed without name change and there is a new pre-install target. (4) Joe user types make install, and it bombs because there is a checksum cookie but the extracted source doesn't match the Makefile anymore! Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Jul 14 17:02:47 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id RAA05646 for ports-outgoing; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 17:02:47 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id RAA05640 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 17:02:44 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id RAA15776; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 17:02:35 -0700 Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 17:02:35 -0700 Message-Id: <199507150002.RAA15776@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: jhs@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de CC: ports@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <199507120949.LAA09706@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de> (message from Julian Howard Stacey on Wed, 12 Jul 1995 11:49:14 +0200) Subject: Re: make fetch on freefall From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk * Would it be a good idea to run a regular automatic make fetch * on freefall, then when other sites mirror the distfiles directory, * they'd get all the newly incorporated extras too ? One thing, ftp.freebsd.org is wcarchive, not freefall. ;) Of course, freefall is sup.freebsd.org so for people who sup ports-distfiles, we need a new set on freefall. Two, freefall is usually pretty far behind in terms of current-ness, I'm not even sure if we can do a "make fetch" without it blowing up all over the place due to missing operands and such. * Some sites (such as the one I tape dump distfiles from once a week), * don't generally run make fetch, as the mirror host doesnt run FreeBSD, * but A-N-Other-UX-OS. Currently my distfiles/ off tape from that mirror * always seesm to have a lot more missing than just the `LEGAL'-limited * stuff, yet I know they mirror frequently. * * If we did this make fetch, we'd want to avoid distributing kermit etc. Yes, that is another problem. We have a pretty good set of distfiles on thud, I do a "make package" every time a port is upgraded or a new port is added, maybe we can use that. Should I start copying distfiles over to freefall and wcarchive? Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Jul 14 17:15:21 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id RAA06664 for ports-outgoing; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 17:15:21 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id RAA06658 ; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 17:15:15 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id RAA15839; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 17:15:07 -0700 Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 17:15:07 -0700 Message-Id: <199507150015.RAA15839@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: paul@FreeBSD.org CC: jkh@time.cdrom.com, ports@FreeBSD.org In-reply-to: <199507121047.LAA08381@server.netcraft.co.uk> (message from Paul Richards on Wed, 12 Jul 1995 11:47:45 +0100 (BST)) Subject: Re: Dmitry Khrustalev: ports/609: tin cannot find sendmail and vi From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk * Maybe a ports-bugs list would be more appropriate. * * If I send it to ports then I'd have to remove them from * bugs otherwise some people will get duplicates which always causes * lots of complaints. People who currently track bugs because they * want to see *all* bug reports might not want to subscribe to * ports and get all the added mail from it. * * I think there's good reasons to keep bugs separate from the other * mailing lists. * * Anyway, let me know what you want and I'll set it up, probably * not until next week though. Another Phd deadline this Friday and I'm * taking a few days off to finish the next draft (hopefully the last * one). I think if we can send PR's with category "ports" to both lists (-bugs and -ports), that would be great. One thing, there aren't that many PR's in category "ports", so there won't be that many duplicates. Your point about people subscribing to bugs to see all bug reports is valid. OTOH, the -ports group is more of a "team" than any of the other lists, and people on the list should be made aware of the bug reports coming in. Right now, there are a little over 200 people on the -ports list, of which less than half are subscribed to -bugs. (There are 300+ in -bugs and 500+ in -hackers.) What do other people think? Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Fri Jul 14 20:21:47 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id UAA14237 for ports-outgoing; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 20:21:47 -0700 Received: from emerald.oz.net (emerald.oz.net [198.68.184.2]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id UAA14228 for ; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 20:21:46 -0700 Received: from wsantee.oz.net by emerald.oz.net via ESMTP (8.6.12/930416.SGI) for id DAA16026; Sat, 15 Jul 1995 03:19:12 GMT Received: (from wsantee@localhost) by wsantee.oz.net (8.6.11/8.6.9) id UAA04585 for ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 20:20:24 -0700 From: Wes Santee Message-Id: <199507150320.UAA04585@wsantee.oz.net> Subject: XPilot port To: ports@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 20:20:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 867 Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk I sent this out to the ports alias a few days ago, but the mail never surfaced and I didn't receive any replies, so I'll try again. That said, I finished a functional port of XPilot to FreeBSD the other day. I have all the files, but I'm afraid I don't know what to do with them now. Do I send them to somebody? Upload them somewhere? It would be helpful if a configuration script was added to the port (the source tarball doesn't include one -- it's all hand configured), but I just wanted to get something functional done. Okay oh port guru's, what do I do now? Cheers, -- ( -Wes Santee | You're never dead 'til you're ) ( wsantee@wsantee.oz.net | out of quarters. --InSoc ) ( http://www.oz.net/~wsantee \------------------------------ ) ( O S / 2 W A R P F r e e B S D ) From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Jul 15 00:23:31 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id AAA27307 for ports-outgoing; Sat, 15 Jul 1995 00:23:31 -0700 Received: from silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU [136.152.64.181]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id AAA27300 for ; Sat, 15 Jul 1995 00:23:28 -0700 Received: (from asami@localhost) by silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU (8.6.11/8.6.9) id AAA16829; Sat, 15 Jul 1995 00:22:51 -0700 Date: Sat, 15 Jul 1995 00:22:51 -0700 Message-Id: <199507150722.AAA16829@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> To: wsantee@wsantee.oz.net CC: ports@freebsd.org In-reply-to: <199507150320.UAA04585@wsantee.oz.net> (message from Wes Santee on Fri, 14 Jul 1995 20:20:21 -0700 (PDT)) Subject: Re: XPilot port From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk * I sent this out to the ports alias a few days ago, but the mail never * surfaced and I didn't receive any replies, so I'll try again. I don't remember seeing it, maybe it got lost when the mailing lists went beszerk. Sorry. * That said, I finished a functional port of XPilot to FreeBSD the other * day. I have all the files, but I'm afraid I don't know what to do * with them now. Do I send them to somebody? Upload them somewhere? Pack it up and put it in ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/incoming. Then send another mail to this list, and someone (probably me) will pick it up. * It would be helpful if a configuration script was added to the port * (the source tarball doesn't include one -- it's all hand configured), * but I just wanted to get something functional done. Well, you can add that later. As long as it compiles fine, that's good enough for a start! :) Thanks! Satoshi From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Jul 15 01:08:07 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id BAA27973 for ports-outgoing; Sat, 15 Jul 1995 01:08:07 -0700 Received: from emerald.oz.net (emerald.oz.net [198.68.184.2]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id BAA27965 for ; Sat, 15 Jul 1995 01:08:04 -0700 Received: from wsantee.oz.net by emerald.oz.net via ESMTP (8.6.12/930416.SGI) for id IAA26149; Sat, 15 Jul 1995 08:05:30 GMT Received: (from wsantee@localhost) by wsantee.oz.net (8.6.11/8.6.9) id BAA00489 for ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 15 Jul 1995 01:06:42 -0700 From: Wes Santee Message-Id: <199507150806.BAA00489@wsantee.oz.net> Subject: Re: XPilot port To: ports@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 15 Jul 1995 01:06:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <199507150722.AAA16829@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> from "Satoshi Asami" at Jul 15, 95 00:22:51 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 944 Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk Satoshi Asami sez: > * That said, I finished a functional port of XPilot to FreeBSD the other > * day. I have all the files, but I'm afraid I don't know what to do > * with them now. Do I send them to somebody? Upload them somewhere? > > Pack it up and put it in ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/incoming. > Then send another mail to this list, and someone (probably me) will > pick it up. Okay, it's up there as xp-port-3.3.1.tar.gz. I just stuck the port files up there, not the original distribution (whose location is listed in the Makefile). Somebody should probably give it the once over since it's the first port I've ever done. Cheers, -- ( -Wes Santee | You're never dead 'til you're ) ( wsantee@wsantee.oz.net | out of quarters. --InSoc ) ( http://www.oz.net/~wsantee \------------------------------ ) ( O S / 2 W A R P F r e e B S D ) From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Jul 15 01:23:33 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id BAA29757 for ports-outgoing; Sat, 15 Jul 1995 01:23:33 -0700 Received: from eikon.regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de (root@eikon.regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de [129.187.42.3]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id BAA29737 for ; Sat, 15 Jul 1995 01:23:28 -0700 Received: from vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de ([129.187.142.36]) by eikon.regent.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de with SMTP id <55319>; Sat, 15 Jul 1995 10:23:18 +0200 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de (8.6.11/8.6.9) with SMTP id WAA13108; Fri, 14 Jul 1995 22:08:58 +0200 Message-Id: <199507142008.WAA13108@vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de> X-Authentication-Warning: vector.eikon.e-technik.tu-muenchen.de: Host localhost didn't use HELO protocol To: Thomas Gellekum cc: thomas@ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de (thomas), ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem building lang/icon on 2.0.5R In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 14 Jul 1995 11:59:52 +0200." <199507140959.LAA15060@ghpc6.ihf.rwth-aachen.de> Date: Fri, 14 Jul 1995 22:08:58 +0200 From: "Julian Stacey " Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > From: Thomas Gellekum > Moin, Just to let the other folks on the list know: I was watching a TV program about the people from the northern coastal strip of Germany, apparently `Moin' is equivalent of `Good Morning' ... well ... it's obvious in retrospect ;-) but not before (I thought he'd been implying `moan moan, so much to do ... :-)' Julian (down on the Southern edge of Germany, where `Moin' is never heard) From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Jul 15 04:59:15 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id EAA17959 for ports-outgoing; Sat, 15 Jul 1995 04:59:15 -0700 Received: from server.netcraft.co.uk (server.netcraft.co.uk [194.72.238.2]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id EAA17953 ; Sat, 15 Jul 1995 04:59:13 -0700 Received: (from paul@localhost) by server.netcraft.co.uk (8.6.11/8.6.9) id MAA17388; Sat, 15 Jul 1995 12:58:40 +0100 From: Paul Richards Message-Id: <199507151158.MAA17388@server.netcraft.co.uk> Subject: Re: Dmitry Khrustalev: ports/609: tin cannot find sendmail and vi To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Date: Sat, 15 Jul 1995 12:58:40 +0100 (BST) Cc: paul@FreeBSD.org, jkh@time.cdrom.com, ports@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <199507150015.RAA15839@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> from "Satoshi Asami" at Jul 14, 95 05:15:07 pm Reply-to: paul@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 724 Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In reply to Satoshi Asami who said > > I think if we can send PR's with category "ports" to both lists (-bugs > and -ports), that would be great. One thing, there aren't that many > PR's in category "ports", so there won't be that many duplicates. > Sorry, I'm not willing to do that. I know from past experience I'll get complaints about duplicates, even if there's only a few and I'm definitely not going to do anything to increase my mail load, it's unbearable already. Setting up a ports-bugs list seems the correct solution. -- Paul Richards, Bluebird Computer Systems. FreeBSD core team member. Internet: paul@FreeBSD.org, http://www.freebsd.org/~paul Phone: 0370 462071 (Mobile), +44 1222 457651 (home) From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Jul 15 13:44:45 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id NAA18990 for ports-outgoing; Sat, 15 Jul 1995 13:44:45 -0700 Received: (from jkh@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id NAA18983 for ports; Sat, 15 Jul 1995 13:44:40 -0700 Date: Sat, 15 Jul 1995 13:44:40 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Message-Id: <199507152044.NAA18983@freefall.cdrom.com> To: ports Subject: Problem with LIB_DEPENDS.. Sender: ports-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk I just put in a port that generates a static library (FWF). Guess what. LIB_DEPENDS only works for dynamic libraries! :-) Satoshi, Heeeeelllp! :) Jordan From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Jul 15 16:44:08 1995 Return-Path: ports-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id QAA25257 for ports-outgoing; Sat, 15 Jul 1995 16:44:08 -0700 Received: from ibp.ibp.fr (ibp.ibp.fr [132.227.60.30]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id QAA25226 ; Sat, 15 Jul 1995 16:43:58 -0700 Received: from blaise.ibp.fr (blaise.ibp.fr [132.227.60.1]) by ibp.ibp.fr (8.6.12/jtpda-5.0) with ESMTP id BAA17149 ; Sun, 16 Jul 1995 01:43:55 +0200 Received: from (roberto@localhost) by blaise.ibp.fr (8.6.12/jtpda-5.0) id BAA21846 ; Sun, 16 Jul 1995 01:43:53 +0200 From: roberto@blaise.ibp.fr (Ollivier Robert) Message-Id: <199507152343.BAA21846@blaise.ibp.fr> Subject: Re: current breaks 2.0.5 binary To: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami) Date: Sun, 16 Jul 1995 01:43:53 +0200 (MET DST) Cc: jleppek@suw2k.ess.harris.com, freebsd-current@freefall.cdrom.com, ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199507141252.FAA00857@silvia.HIP.Berkeley.EDU> from "Satoshi Asami" at Jul 14, 95 05:52:14 am X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 2.2-CURRENT ctm#880 X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 315 Sender: ports-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > >> top > kvm_open: proc size mismatch (35520 total, 620 chunks) > top: Out of memory. > ======= > > Do we need an additional patch? You didn't recompile libkvm I guess :-) -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD 2.2-CURRENT #5: Fri Jul 14 12:28:04 MET DST 1995