Date: Sun, 28 Apr 1996 13:01:33 +0200 (MET DST) From: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> To: peter@taronga.com (Peter da Silva) Cc: scsi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Adaptec 1542, Adaptec 1742, Bustek 747, Archive Viper, Help? Message-ID: <199604281101.NAA04177@keltia.freenix.fr> In-Reply-To: <199604272249.RAA01804@bonkers.taronga.com> from Peter da Silva at "Apr 27, 96 05:49:58 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
It seems that Peter da Silva said: > When I try to install the 1742 as a second controller, it interferes with > the 747. No matter what EISA config I set, if the 1742 is enabled the Bustek > BIOS tried to drive it as a Bustek. I don't understand EISA config that > well, so I could simply be thick. I'm surprised because I also have a Buslogic 747S and an Adaptec 1740A in my machine: eisa0: <ECS1110 (System Board)> Probing for devices on the EISA bus bt0: <Buslogic 74xB SCSI host adapter> at 0x330-0x333, 0x3c00-0x3cff irq 11 bt0: on eisa0 slot 3 bt0: Bt747 / 0-(32bit) bus bt0: reading board settings, busmastering, int=11 bt0: version 3.37, fast sync, parity, 32 mbxs, 32 ccbs [...] ahb0: <Adaptec 174x SCSI host adapter> at 0x5c00-0x5cff irq 12 on eisa0 slot 5 I run -CURRENT and the SCSI code has signifiantly changed since 2.0.5R... I don't remember whether I had the 1740A or not during 2.0.5R times but I've had any problem mixing the two. Is your 1740A in enhanced mode ? I can send you my EISA config. files if you want. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 2.2-CURRENT #13: Sun Apr 21 18:14:54 MET DST 1996
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199604281101.NAA04177>