From owner-freebsd-stable Sun Jul 16 4:27:12 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from camus.cybercable.fr (camus.cybercable.fr [212.198.0.200]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5E0F237B76D for ; Sun, 16 Jul 2000 04:27:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mhenrion@cybercable.fr) Received: (qmail 15295962 invoked from network); 16 Jul 2000 11:27:02 -0000 Received: from r121m199.cybercable.tm.fr (HELO cybercable.fr) ([195.132.121.199]) (envelope-sender ) by camus.cybercable.fr (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 16 Jul 2000 11:27:02 -0000 Message-ID: <39719CC5.3554B6C5@cybercable.fr> Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2000 13:30:13 +0200 From: Maxime Henrion X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Warner Losh , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: config and config -r References: <3970AB23.F76B05CB@cybercable.fr> <200007160541.XAA50804@harmony.village.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Warner Losh wrote: > In message <3970AB23.F76B05CB@cybercable.fr> Maxime Henrion writes: > : But after rebooting on this new kernel, I had a page fault before > : any kernel message :/ Is there anything to check in order to know if I > : can use a config instead of a config -r ? If using a config without the > : -r option is dangerous, I think it shouldn't be the default. Is it the > : case ? > > Make depend is required if you ever want to build kernels more than > once. > > Warner Of course, I did a make depend ! I think that if config could be dangerous this way, -r should be its default behaviour. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message