Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 01:00:00 -0700 (PDT) From: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>, Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Style Wars Message-ID: <200109300800.f8U800Z41709@earth.backplane.com> References: <XFMail.010927173631.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <200109291802.f8TI2jd38468@earth.backplane.com> <3BB60D52.4A29F52E@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
: :well what would your prefered style be? : There is no single style that adequately describes a human readable format for structures. It depends on the structure. It is best to leave it vague style.9. Even the stuff in style.9 right now in regards to structures is mostly junk. Nobody follows any of it (except maybe the guy who wrote it), and for good reason. Put a tab after the 'struct' keyword in a field definition? Only if I really wanted to make it unreadable! -Matt To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200109300800.f8U800Z41709>