From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Feb 11 12:55:56 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net (tomts5.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0541237B401 for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 12:55:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from colba.net ([216.209.220.222]) by tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with ESMTP id <20010211205553.CEKG2541.tomts5-srv.bellnexxia.net@colba.net> for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 15:55:53 -0500 Message-ID: <3A86FC74.CFE63040@colba.net> Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 15:56:21 -0500 From: Paul Khavkine X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Compaq DL360 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi, I'm getting a Compaq DL360 in a few days. Anyone is running STABLE on it? Is there anything that can cause problems or anything i should be aware of? As far as i could find, everything is supported on it. Thanx Paul To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Feb 11 18:15:12 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from www.golsyd.net.au (www.golsyd.net.au [203.57.20.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DB2E37B401 for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 18:15:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from [203.164.12.28] by www.quake.com.au (NTMail 4.30.0012/AB6169.63.5724aadf) with ESMTP id wqeaaaaa for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 13:14:41 +1100 Message-ID: <3A874764.376C64B0@quake.com.au> Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 13:16:04 +1100 From: Kal Torak X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: phil grainger Cc: FreeBSD-isp Subject: Re: ip redirection References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010211154104.02709190@freebsd.cnnet.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org phil grainger wrote: > > hi, > our isp recently got a satellite feed and i managed to get the squid > talking via the sat ip's ... > > no i am wanting to use the satellite for incoming ftp and incoming napster > traffic. > > our servers run a 203. (land line) and 209. (satellite) networks our > clients use > 203. ip's > > our clients gateway is a freebsd 3-stable machine although i can change that > to a linux 2.2 box (of course i would prefer the freebsd solution!) > > the freebsd box is running ipnat and ipfw > > has anyone got any advice on how to manage this So you want to force all ftp and napster traffic to use the satellite? And there is a program under linux that will let you do this??? If your saying what I think your saying I dont think its possible... Do you handle your route advertisements to your upstream? Iv never had a multihomed system, so im working on theory here, but even if you are doing routing via BGP or whatever your upstream supports, I dont think you can do that kind of thing... But you can easily make all your out going ftp/napster connections go out via the satellite, the way they come to you though is decided by routers not under your control... You can do the outgoing with ipfw fwd or some proxy I guess, but since it seems you want to control incoming, I really dont think you can besides deny it on the route you dont want it using... I was hoping someone with more experience with multihoming and routes would of answered you by now, but I havent seen any replies so I am just have a bash at giving you an answer based on my theoretical knowledge on the subject :) Good luck, I hope someone can give you a better answer! Kal. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Feb 11 19:24:31 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from ren.sasknow.com (ren.sasknow.com [207.195.92.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A79837B401 for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 19:24:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (ryan@localhost) by ren.sasknow.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA86450; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 21:24:13 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ryan@sasknow.com) Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 21:24:13 -0600 (CST) From: Ryan Thompson To: phil grainger Cc: isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ip redirection In-Reply-To: <5.0.2.1.2.20010211154104.02709190@freebsd.cnnet.com.au> Message-ID: Organization: SaskNow Technologies [www.sasknow.com] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org phil grainger wrote to isp@FreeBSD.ORG: > hi, > our isp recently got a satellite feed and i managed to get the squid > talking via the sat ip's ... > > no i am wanting to use the satellite for incoming ftp and incoming napster > traffic. > > our servers run a 203. (land line) and 209. (satellite) networks our > clients use > 203. ip's > > our clients gateway is a freebsd 3-stable machine although i can change that > to a linux 2.2 box (of course i would prefer the freebsd solution!) > > the freebsd box is running ipnat and ipfw I think you're making this more complicated than it should be. You can't route specific ports with IP--you can only route subnets. (Imagine how large routing tables would get if multiplexed by 64K possible port addresses :-) If you don't want someone accessing FTP over the land line ("203."), simply block incoming FTP connections on that subnet in your packet filter for that subnet, or just don't bind the FTP daemon to an address on that network. Same applies to Napster. Then, just configure forward DNS to resolve the hostname to the sattelite (209.) IPs, so your users won't have to know the difference. Maybe you could configure your gateway to forward incoming FTP packets between the subnets, but that still won't stop people from connecting over the landline subnet, and I think you'd be hard pressed to send a reply BACK from one IP address when the client expects it on another. :-) > has anyone got any advice on how to manage this > > > thanks, > > Phil Grainger > ---------------------------------------------------------- > ozxpress.com.au User Support Services > http://ozxpress.com.au > ---------------------------------------------------------- > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > -- Ryan Thompson Network Administrator, Accounts SaskNow Technologies - http://www.sasknow.com #106-380 3120 8th St E - Saskatoon, SK - S7H 0W2 Tel: 306-664-3600 Fax: 306-664-1161 Saskatoon Toll-Free: 877-727-5669 (877-SASKNOW) North America To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sun Feb 11 20: 2:39 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from cody.jharris.com (cody.jharris.com [205.238.128.83]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E99FE37B401 for ; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 20:02:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (nick@localhost) by cody.jharris.com (8.11.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f1C4Ocr34049; Sun, 11 Feb 2001 22:24:38 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from nick@rogness.net) Date: Sun, 11 Feb 2001 22:24:38 -0600 (CST) From: Nick Rogness X-Sender: nick@cody.jharris.com To: Ryan Thompson Cc: phil grainger , isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ip redirection In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, Ryan Thompson wrote: > phil grainger wrote to isp@FreeBSD.ORG: > > > hi, > > our isp recently got a satellite feed and i managed to get the squid > > talking via the sat ip's ... > > > > no i am wanting to use the satellite for incoming ftp and incoming napster > > traffic. > > Incoming to your machine in via the sat? or incoming to your BSD machine out via the sat from your clients? > > our servers run a 203. (land line) and 209. (satellite) networks our > > clients use > > 203. ip's You didn't provide enough details for anyone to help you. How is your BSD machine connected, how are your clients connected? > > > > our clients gateway is a freebsd 3-stable machine although i can change that > > to a linux 2.2 box (of course i would prefer the freebsd solution!) > > > > the freebsd box is running ipnat and ipfw ipfw fwd X.X.X.X tcp from any to any 21 Where X.X.X.X is the ip of the next hop Sat router IP. Of course, I am assuming that outbound ftp be redirected because I still don't see how your network is laid out... I need more details. > > I think you're making this more complicated than it should be. You can't > route specific ports with IP--you can only route subnets. (Imagine how Sure you can, otherwise things like transparent proxy suuport would not be doable. It's just not a good idea...most of the time. For this implementation it is perfectly doable. > large routing tables would get if multiplexed by 64K possible port > addresses :-) Of course you wouldn't do that on BGP ;-) Nick Rogness - Keep on routing in a Free World... "FreeBSD: The Power to Serve!" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Feb 12 0:15:22 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from sai.co.za (mail.sai.co.za [196.33.40.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C88537B401 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 00:15:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from dave ([196.33.40.17]) by mail.sai.co.za (SBMail MTA v2.11(1135) SMTPD32) with ESMTP id AA9376; for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:14:30 0200 (South Africa Standard Time) From: "David Wilson" To: "Dennis" Cc: "FreeBSD Mailing List" , , Subject: RE: Transparent proxying with delay pools based on IP precedence bit Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:14:49 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 In-Reply-To: <5.0.0.25.0.20010208142840.04044eb0@mail.etinc.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi Dennis, Thanks for getting back to me. >just curious, is this a standard practice? I'm not sure if it's standard practice, but using precedence fields definitely makes our life much easier when it comes to discriminating between local and international Incoming traffic. >how does it handle outgoing non-tcp traffic? We don't really limit our clients outgoing bandwidth, because our provider doesn't limit us ;-) It's really just incoming bandwidth that we worry about. >we could do that in our etbwmgr product for freebsd. That would be great ! Especially if it could somehow interface with Squid so that any Cache hits would not be bandwidth limited, but TCP_MISS's would be pulled down at the bandwidth specified for that particular client, 16K if it was and international site or 64K if it was a local site... all based on precedence bit. David Wilson -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG [mailto:owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Dennis Sent: 08 February 2001 09:48 To: David Wilson; squid-users@ircache.net Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG; technical@sai.co.za Subject: Re: Transparent proxying with delay pools based on IP precedence bit At 12:42 PM 02/06/2001, David Wilson wrote: >Hi guys, howzit going ? ;-) > >An nice juicy question: > >We are an ISP and we allocate our leased line clients subnets of IP's. >At the moment we use a Packeteer traffic shaper to limit our each of clients >international bandwidth to 16K international & 64K Local. >The Packeteer is able to distinguish between local & international traffic >because our bandwidth provider marks our incoming packets "precedence" >fields of all international traffic with a "2" and all local traffic with a >"0". just curious, is this a standard practice? we could do that in our etbwmgr product for freebsd. how does it handle outgoing non-tcp traffic? Dennis To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Feb 12 2:16:56 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mail.nsvis.dk (mail.nsvis.dk [194.239.250.155]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9E55437B401 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 02:16:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from goppus.overalt.no [213.46.218.132] by mail.nsvis.dk (SMTPD32-4.07) id A8EB26B20122; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:20:27 +0000 From: Marius Sorteberg Organization: Overalt To: Paul Khavkine , freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Compaq DL360 Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:16:18 +0100 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.99] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" References: <3A86FC74.CFE63040@colba.net> In-Reply-To: <3A86FC74.CFE63040@colba.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <01021211161800.00281@goppus.overalt.no> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I'm running STABLE on a Proliant 5500. I used SmartStart 4.90, and had to choose Linux as OS to get SMP support. I think this is true for other Compaq servers also. Marius On Sunday 11 February 2001 21:56, Paul Khavkine wrote: > Hi, > > I'm getting a Compaq DL360 in a few days. > Anyone is running STABLE on it? > Is there anything that can cause problems or anything i should be aware > of? > As far as i could find, everything is supported on it. > > Thanx > Paul > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Feb 12 5:49:54 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from ns.nexos.com.br (unknown [200.254.29.67]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47B5937B491 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 05:49:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from genipabu.nexos.com.br (ubu.nexos.com.br [200.254.29.75]) by ns.nexos.com.br (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA34029 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:49:51 -0200 (BDB) (envelope-from josue@nexos.com.br) Received: from localhost (josue@localhost) by genipabu.nexos.com.br (8.9.3/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA64034 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:56:16 -0200 (BDB) (envelope-from josue@nexos.com.br) X-Authentication-Warning: genipabu.nexos.com.br: josue owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:56:16 -0200 (BDB) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Josu=E9_Jos=E9_Souza_Jr=2E?= To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: IPX and ipfw Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello, I'm trying to setup a firewall in an environment composed by a NT server running an application and several Win98 desktops acessing the NT using IPX. All hosts in this network are conected directly to the Internet via an Ethernet conecction with an ISP and I need to put a firewall in the middle because today they have no security at all. The problem is that they want to put the NT server in a separate network from the desktops and filter packets between the server and desktop. I kown I can route IPX packets with FreeBSD but I don't know how to filter this with ipfw. Is there any way to do this or all ipx packets will always match the default rule? If I use FreeBSD bridging capabilities can I solve this problem? Thanks in advance, ------------------------------------------------ Josu=E9 Jos=E9 Souza Jr. Opera=E7=F5es - Suporte - Desenvolvimento - Pesquisa josue@nexos.com.br Nexos Servi=E7os de Redes Ltda. http://www.nexos.com.br 55 71 341-4072 Salvador - Bahia - Brasil ------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Feb 12 6:53:23 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from caturix.genilog.net (unknown [204.92.10.134]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C48B37B4EC for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 06:53:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from colba.net ([204.92.10.133]) by caturix.genilog.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with ESMTP id KAA26932; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 10:44:19 -0500 Message-ID: <3A87B364.58B8ABBA@colba.net> Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:56:53 +0000 From: Paul Khavkine X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marius Sorteberg Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Compaq DL360 References: <3A86FC74.CFE63040@colba.net> <01021211161800.00281@goppus.overalt.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Well i dont need SMP so that wouldn't be a problem for me. Thanx Paul Marius Sorteberg wrote: > I'm running STABLE on a Proliant 5500. I used SmartStart 4.90, and had to > choose Linux as OS to get SMP support. > I think this is true for other Compaq servers also. > > Marius > On Sunday 11 February 2001 21:56, Paul Khavkine wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm getting a Compaq DL360 in a few days. > > Anyone is running STABLE on it? > > Is there anything that can cause problems or anything i should be aware > > of? > > As far as i could find, everything is supported on it. > > > > Thanx > > Paul > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Feb 12 8:53:33 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from etinc.com (et-gw.etinc.com [207.252.1.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B92B137B4EC for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 08:53:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from dbsys.etinc.com (dbsys.etinc.com [207.252.1.18]) by etinc.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id LAA58406; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 11:59:35 GMT (envelope-from dennis@etinc.com) Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.0.20010212120438.02732b00@mail.etinc.com> X-Sender: dennis@mail.etinc.com (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0 Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 12:05:29 -0500 To: Kal Torak , phil grainger From: Dennis Subject: Re: ip redirection Cc: FreeBSD-isp In-Reply-To: <3A874764.376C64B0@quake.com.au> References: <5.0.2.1.2.20010211154104.02709190@freebsd.cnnet.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Napster is a bit tricky, because it uses variable ports for transfers. You have to have a smart filter. Dennis At 09:16 PM 02/11/2001, Kal Torak wrote: >phil grainger wrote: > > > > hi, > > our isp recently got a satellite feed and i managed to get the squid > > talking via the sat ip's ... > > > > no i am wanting to use the satellite for incoming ftp and incoming napster > > traffic. > > > > our servers run a 203. (land line) and 209. (satellite) networks our > > clients use > > 203. ip's > > > > our clients gateway is a freebsd 3-stable machine although i can change > that > > to a linux 2.2 box (of course i would prefer the freebsd solution!) > > > > the freebsd box is running ipnat and ipfw > > > > has anyone got any advice on how to manage this > > >So you want to force all ftp and napster traffic to use the satellite? >And there is a program under linux that will let you do this??? > >If your saying what I think your saying I dont think its possible... >Do you handle your route advertisements to your upstream? Iv never had a >multihomed system, so im working on theory here, but even if you are doing >routing via BGP or whatever your upstream supports, I dont think you can >do that kind of thing... > >But you can easily make all your out going ftp/napster connections go >out via the satellite, the way they come to you though is decided by routers >not under your control... > >You can do the outgoing with ipfw fwd or some proxy I guess, but since it >seems >you want to control incoming, I really dont think you can besides deny it on >the route you dont want it using... > >I was hoping someone with more experience with multihoming and routes would of >answered you by now, but I havent seen any replies so I am just have a bash at >giving you an answer based on my theoretical knowledge on the subject :) > >Good luck, >I hope someone can give you a better answer! >Kal. > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Feb 12 9: 4:28 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mail.polytechnic.edu.na (mail.polytechnic.edu.na [196.31.225.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F9D37B491 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 09:04:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from [172.16.0.200] (helo=iafrica.com.na) by mail.polytechnic.edu.na with esmtp (Exim 3.02 #2) id 14SPBj-0003u3-00; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 18:03:07 -0200 Message-ID: <3A881726.E75A96CD@iafrica.com.na> Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 19:02:30 +0200 From: Tim Priebe X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nick Rogness Cc: Ryan Thompson , phil grainger , isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ip redirection References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I suspect that nat is the solution to your problem. For this to work, all of your outgoing traffic, and your incoming traffic via the satellite feed must pass through the FreeBSD box. You then via nat change the source address for the protocols you want to come in via the satellite link. Tim. Nick Rogness wrote: > On Sun, 11 Feb 2001, Ryan Thompson wrote: > > > phil grainger wrote to isp@FreeBSD.ORG: > > > > > hi, > > > our isp recently got a satellite feed and i managed to get the squid > > > talking via the sat ip's ... > > > > > > no i am wanting to use the satellite for incoming ftp and incoming napster > > > traffic. > > > > > Incoming to your machine in via the sat? or incoming to your BSD > machine out via the sat from your clients? > > > > our servers run a 203. (land line) and 209. (satellite) networks our > > > clients use > > > 203. ip's > > You didn't provide enough details for anyone to help you. How is > your BSD machine connected, how are your clients connected? > > > > > > > our clients gateway is a freebsd 3-stable machine although i can change that > > > to a linux 2.2 box (of course i would prefer the freebsd solution!) > > > > > > the freebsd box is running ipnat and ipfw > > ipfw fwd X.X.X.X tcp from any to any 21 > > Where X.X.X.X is the ip of the next hop Sat router IP. Of course, > I am assuming that outbound ftp be redirected because I still > don't see how your network is laid out... > > I need more details. > > > > > I think you're making this more complicated than it should be. You can't > > route specific ports with IP--you can only route subnets. (Imagine how > > Sure you can, otherwise things like transparent proxy > suuport would not be doable. It's just not a good idea...most of > the time. For this implementation it is perfectly doable. > > > large routing tables would get if multiplexed by 64K possible port > > addresses :-) > > Of course you wouldn't do that on BGP ;-) > > Nick Rogness > - Keep on routing in a Free World... > "FreeBSD: The Power to Serve!" > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Feb 12 12:30: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from sm8.texas.rr.com (sm8.texas.rr.com [24.93.35.220]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B37C837B4EC for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 12:30:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from bryanhome (cs164208-129.jam.rr.com [24.164.208.129]) by sm8.texas.rr.com (8.11.0/8.11.1) with SMTP id f1CKSEM26728 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 14:28:14 -0600 From: "Bryan Bunch" To: Subject: Sendmail Question.. Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 14:30:03 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello ALl, I have a quick question about sendmail. I have a machine that is running v 8.11.2 with the following features: FEATURE(access_db)dnl FEATURE(mailertable)dnl FEATURE(virtusertable)dnl FEATURE(domaintable)dnl This server is primarily a web server (web_server), but does outgoing email through the usage of cgi scripts, etc. I have one particular web site say xyz.com that is on this machine, but all of the email for the domain is handled by another machine (mail_server). There is an A record set up in DNS that points xyz.com to the (web_server) machine. This is so that if someone just types in xyz.com in their web browser, they will get the web site. I have a MX record that points to the (mail_server) machine. If a CGI script or if I try to send mail from the (web_server) machine, for some reason it thinks that it is local for the xyz.com domain, even though I do NOT have it listed in my local-host-names file. If am at any other machine mail works fine and gets routed to the proper machine. I'm assuming that this has something do to with the A record of xyz.com that points to (web_server). I have tried an entry in my mailertable: .xyz.com smtp:mail_server This does not work. The only way that I have worked around the problem is by putting an entry in my virtusertable that maps specific users to the correct user on the (mail_server) machine. There must be a simpler way. TIA.. Bryan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Feb 12 15:37:47 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from fep04-svc.swip.net (fep04.swip.net [130.244.199.132]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 415A837B491 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 15:37:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from henrik.localdomain ([212.151.236.146]) by fep04-svc.swip.net (InterMail vM.5.01.01.01 201-252-104) with ESMTP id <20010212233716.EQOF6568.fep04-svc.swip.net@henrik.localdomain>; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 00:37:16 +0100 Received: from henrik.localdomain (IDENT:henrik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by henrik.localdomain (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id AAA12418; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 00:21:07 +0100 Message-ID: <3A886FE3.7F2C5053@hem.passagen.se> Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 00:21:07 +0100 From: Henrik Nordstrom X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i586) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Wilson Cc: Dennis , FreeBSD Mailing List , squid-users@ircache.net, technical@sai.co.za Subject: Re: Transparent proxying with delay pools based on IP precedence bit References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org David Wilson wrote: > >we could do that in our etbwmgr product for freebsd. > That would be great ! Especially if it could somehow interface with Squid so > that any Cache hits would not be bandwidth limited, but TCP_MISS's would be > pulled down at the bandwidth specified for that particular client, 16K if it > was and international site or 64K if it was a local site... all based on > precedence bit. Please note that due to the way delay pools operates, they are quite likely more efficient than any packet based bandwidth limiting. Delay pools operates at the application level, with no TCP overhead due to extra retransmissions or whatever. -- Henrik Nordstrom Squid hacker To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Feb 12 16:33:43 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from wildcatblue.com (flanders.wildcatblue.com [206.157.147.206]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0148437B491 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:33:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from vghk (p1mp.vghk.e-xtreme.org [206.157.147.77]) by wildcatblue.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 3D81D85B01 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 19:35:58 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <003001c09554$4182b350$577afea9@vghk> From: "david rhodus" To: Subject: Majordomo with postfix Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 19:31:06 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_002D_01C0952A.5824B6A0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2919.6700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6700 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_002D_01C0952A.5824B6A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Has anyone been able to setup majordomo with post fix ? I have been trying for about 2 weeks now. It eather says it cant exec the wrapper or majordomo.cf is owned by = wrong user id. Is there any trick to this. I'v been using the one from = the ports dir..=20 P.S.=20 My Boss has really been pounding at me for this to work. ------=_NextPart_000_002D_01C0952A.5824B6A0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Has anyone been able to setup majordomo = with post=20 fix ?
I have been trying for about 2 weeks=20 now.
It eather says it cant exec the wrapper = or=20 majordomo.cf is owned by wrong user id. Is there any trick to this. I'v = been=20 using the one from the ports dir..
 
P.S.
    My Boss has really = been pounding=20 at me for this to work.
------=_NextPart_000_002D_01C0952A.5824B6A0-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Feb 12 16:44: 0 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from sasami.jurai.net (sasami.jurai.net [64.0.106.45]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 631B637B491 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 16:43:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (scanner@localhost) by sasami.jurai.net (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA02255; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 19:40:42 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 19:40:42 -0500 (EST) From: To: david rhodus Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Majordomo with postfix In-Reply-To: <003001c09554$4182b350$577afea9@vghk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Try mailman instead. I find it much better then majordomo and its written in Python! :-) It also works great with postfix! ============================================================================= -Chris Watson (316) 326-3862 | FreeBSD Consultant, FreeBSD Geek Work: scanner@jurai.net | Open Systems Inc., Wellington, Kansas Home: scanner@deceptively.shady.org | http://open-systems.net ============================================================================= WINDOWS: "Where do you want to go today?" LINUX: "Where do you want to go tommorow?" BSD: "Are you guys coming or what?" ============================================================================= irc.openprojects.net #FreeBSD -Join the revolution! Author of the upcoming Postfix book. ICQ: 20016186 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Feb 12 17: 9:19 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from corey.datafast.net.au (corey.datafast.net.au [203.123.67.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE5E337B4EC for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:09:16 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 20259 invoked by uid 1000); 13 Feb 2001 01:09:14 -0000 From: "Corey Ralph" Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 12:09:14 +1100 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Bind problems Message-ID: <20010213120914.B99396@corey.datafast.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi all, I am having a problem with one of my nameservers since upgrading bind after the advisory last week. It runs slave for all our zones. It has stopped updating its zone files. Doing it manually using /usr/libexec/named-xfer works fine. I tried setting the path to it in the options just incase it was looking in the wrong place, that didn't help. There are no relevant messages in the logs. Has anybody seen this before? Also, I am considering switching to djbdns to avoid this constant upgrading. Any experiences with this? Would bind 9 be a better choice? Cheers, Corey Ralph To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Feb 12 17:21:43 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mercury.ccmr.cornell.edu (mercury.ccmr.cornell.edu [128.84.231.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87DE737B491 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:21:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from ruby.ccmr.cornell.edu (IDENT:0@ruby.ccmr.cornell.edu [128.84.231.115]) by mercury.ccmr.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA11416; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 20:21:37 -0500 Received: from localhost (mitch@localhost) by ruby.ccmr.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA13011; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 20:21:36 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: ruby.ccmr.cornell.edu: mitch owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 20:21:36 -0500 (EST) From: Mitch Collinsworth To: Corey Ralph Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bind problems In-Reply-To: <20010213120914.B99396@corey.datafast.net.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Did you install from the freebsd port or from the ISC source? Was your previous install from the same source? They (last time I looked, admittedly a few months back) look in different places for their configuration file. Maybe you're not reading the .conf (or .boot) file you think you are? -Mitch On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Corey Ralph wrote: > Hi all, > > I am having a problem with one of my nameservers since upgrading bind > after the advisory last week. > > It runs slave for all our zones. It has stopped updating its zone > files. Doing it manually using /usr/libexec/named-xfer works fine. I > tried setting the path to it in the options just incase it was looking > in the wrong place, that didn't help. There are no relevant messages in > the logs. > > Has anybody seen this before? > > Also, I am considering switching to djbdns to avoid this constant > upgrading. Any experiences with this? Would bind 9 be a better choice? > > Cheers, > Corey Ralph > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Feb 12 17:23:40 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from hex.databits.net (hex.databits.net [207.29.192.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BFA2737B4EC for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:23:36 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 55144 invoked by uid 1001); 13 Feb 2001 01:23:36 -0000 Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 20:23:36 -0500 From: Pete Fritchman To: david rhodus Cc: isp@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Majordomo with postfix Message-ID: <20010212202336.C54207@databits.net> References: <003001c09554$4182b350$577afea9@vghk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <003001c09554$4182b350$577afea9@vghk>; from sdrhodus@wildcatblue.com on Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 07:31:06PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In case you didn't know, the FreeBSD.org lists are running on postfix and majordomo :) It sounds like you've got majordomo setup incorectly - make sure the wrapper is running as a user that has read access to majordomo.cf. The only breakage that I've heard about with running postfix+majordomo is the "approve" command, documented at: http://www.postfix.org/faq.html#majordomo-approve -pete ++ 12/02/01 19:31 -0500 - david rhodus: >Has anyone been able to setup majordomo with post fix ? >I have been trying for about 2 weeks now. >It eather says it cant exec the wrapper or majordomo.cf is owned by wrong user id. Is there any trick to this. I'v been using the one from the ports dir.. > >P.S. > My Boss has really been pounding at me for this to work. -- Pete Fritchman Databits Network Services, Inc. finger petef@databits.net for PGP key To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Feb 12 17:43: 8 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mail.tcworks.net (mail.tcworks.net [216.61.218.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0052137B491 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:43:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from tcworks.net (creed.tcworks.net [216.61.218.6]) by mail.tcworks.net (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id f1D1dCT92688; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 19:39:12 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <3A889199.D8342910@tcworks.net> Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 19:44:57 -0600 From: Chris Cook X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mitch Collinsworth Cc: Corey Ralph , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bind problems References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I had a similar problem after upgrading via the ISC source... it wanted /etc/named.conf instead of /etc/namedb/named.conf. I had to run named like so: "/usr/sbin/named -c /etc/namedb/named.conf -u bind -g bind" . - Chris Mitch Collinsworth wrote: > > Did you install from the freebsd port or from the ISC source? > Was your previous install from the same source? They (last time > I looked, admittedly a few months back) look in different places > for their configuration file. Maybe you're not reading the .conf > (or .boot) file you think you are? > > -Mitch > > On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Corey Ralph wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I am having a problem with one of my nameservers since upgrading bind > > after the advisory last week. > > > > It runs slave for all our zones. It has stopped updating its zone > > files. Doing it manually using /usr/libexec/named-xfer works fine. I > > tried setting the path to it in the options just incase it was looking > > in the wrong place, that didn't help. There are no relevant messages in > > the logs. > > > > Has anybody seen this before? > > > > Also, I am considering switching to djbdns to avoid this constant > > upgrading. Any experiences with this? Would bind 9 be a better choice? > > > > Cheers, > > Corey Ralph > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Feb 12 17:44: 7 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from corey.datafast.net.au (corey.datafast.net.au [203.123.67.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2350F37B491 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 17:44:04 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 49280 invoked by uid 1000); 13 Feb 2001 01:44:03 -0000 From: "Corey Ralph" Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 12:44:03 +1100 To: Mitch Collinsworth Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bind problems Message-ID: <20010213124403.C99396@corey.datafast.net.au> References: <20010213120914.B99396@corey.datafast.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from mitch@ccmr.cornell.edu on Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 08:21:36PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Mitch, I originally installed from the freebsd base system, and have done a make world to update it before. This time I just applied the binary update that was with the advisory. I think it is using the right .conf though, because it is serving queries, just not updating the zones. Cheers, Corey Ralph On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 08:21:36PM -0500, Mitch Collinsworth wrote: > Did you install from the freebsd port or from the ISC source? > Was your previous install from the same source? They (last time > I looked, admittedly a few months back) look in different places > for their configuration file. Maybe you're not reading the .conf > (or .boot) file you think you are? > > -Mitch > > > On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Corey Ralph wrote: > > > Hi all, > > > > I am having a problem with one of my nameservers since upgrading bind > > after the advisory last week. > > > > It runs slave for all our zones. It has stopped updating its zone > > files. Doing it manually using /usr/libexec/named-xfer works fine. I > > tried setting the path to it in the options just incase it was looking > > in the wrong place, that didn't help. There are no relevant messages in > > the logs. > > > > Has anybody seen this before? > > > > Also, I am considering switching to djbdns to avoid this constant > > upgrading. Any experiences with this? Would bind 9 be a better choice? > > > > Cheers, > > Corey Ralph > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Feb 12 18:21:56 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mercury.ccmr.cornell.edu (mercury.ccmr.cornell.edu [128.84.231.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E72CA37B491 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 18:21:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from ruby.ccmr.cornell.edu (IDENT:0@ruby.ccmr.cornell.edu [128.84.231.115]) by mercury.ccmr.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA12079; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 21:21:51 -0500 Received: from localhost (mitch@localhost) by ruby.ccmr.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA13201; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 21:21:50 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: ruby.ccmr.cornell.edu: mitch owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 21:21:50 -0500 (EST) From: Mitch Collinsworth To: Corey Ralph Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bind problems In-Reply-To: <20010213124403.C99396@corey.datafast.net.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org OK, how about checking what user named is running as, and then checking your zone files and their directory to make sure that user has read/write access. -Mitch On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Corey Ralph wrote: > Mitch, > > I originally installed from the freebsd base system, and have done a > make world to update it before. This time I just applied the binary > update that was with the advisory. > > I think it is using the right .conf though, because it is serving > queries, just not updating the zones. > > Cheers, > Corey Ralph > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 08:21:36PM -0500, Mitch Collinsworth wrote: > > Did you install from the freebsd port or from the ISC source? > > Was your previous install from the same source? They (last time > > I looked, admittedly a few months back) look in different places > > for their configuration file. Maybe you're not reading the .conf > > (or .boot) file you think you are? > > > > -Mitch > > > > > > On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Corey Ralph wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > I am having a problem with one of my nameservers since upgrading bind > > > after the advisory last week. > > > > > > It runs slave for all our zones. It has stopped updating its zone > > > files. Doing it manually using /usr/libexec/named-xfer works fine. I > > > tried setting the path to it in the options just incase it was looking > > > in the wrong place, that didn't help. There are no relevant messages in > > > the logs. > > > > > > Has anybody seen this before? > > > > > > Also, I am considering switching to djbdns to avoid this constant > > > upgrading. Any experiences with this? Would bind 9 be a better choice? > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Corey Ralph > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Feb 12 18:26: 7 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from corey.datafast.net.au (corey.datafast.net.au [203.123.67.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2BE0337B4EC for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 18:26:03 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 84993 invoked by uid 1000); 13 Feb 2001 02:26:00 -0000 From: "Corey Ralph" Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 13:26:00 +1100 To: Mitch Collinsworth Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bind problems Message-ID: <20010213132600.F99396@corey.datafast.net.au> References: <20010213124403.C99396@corey.datafast.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from mitch@ccmr.cornell.edu on Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 09:21:50PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org It is running as root. Cheers, Corey On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 09:21:50PM -0500, Mitch Collinsworth wrote: > OK, how about checking what user named is running as, and then > checking your zone files and their directory to make sure that > user has read/write access. > > -Mitch > > > On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Corey Ralph wrote: > > > Mitch, > > > > I originally installed from the freebsd base system, and have done a > > make world to update it before. This time I just applied the binary > > update that was with the advisory. > > > > I think it is using the right .conf though, because it is serving > > queries, just not updating the zones. > > > > Cheers, > > Corey Ralph > > > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 08:21:36PM -0500, Mitch Collinsworth wrote: > > > Did you install from the freebsd port or from the ISC source? > > > Was your previous install from the same source? They (last time > > > I looked, admittedly a few months back) look in different places > > > for their configuration file. Maybe you're not reading the .conf > > > (or .boot) file you think you are? > > > > > > -Mitch > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Corey Ralph wrote: > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > I am having a problem with one of my nameservers since upgrading bind > > > > after the advisory last week. > > > > > > > > It runs slave for all our zones. It has stopped updating its zone > > > > files. Doing it manually using /usr/libexec/named-xfer works fine. I > > > > tried setting the path to it in the options just incase it was looking > > > > in the wrong place, that didn't help. There are no relevant messages in > > > > the logs. > > > > > > > > Has anybody seen this before? > > > > > > > > Also, I am considering switching to djbdns to avoid this constant > > > > upgrading. Any experiences with this? Would bind 9 be a better choice? > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > Corey Ralph > > > > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Feb 12 18:50:50 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mercury.ccmr.cornell.edu (mercury.ccmr.cornell.edu [128.84.231.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DA6637B4EC for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 18:50:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from ruby.ccmr.cornell.edu (IDENT:0@ruby.ccmr.cornell.edu [128.84.231.115]) by mercury.ccmr.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA12390; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 21:50:44 -0500 Received: from localhost (mitch@localhost) by ruby.ccmr.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id VAA13346; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 21:50:37 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: ruby.ccmr.cornell.edu: mitch owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 21:50:37 -0500 (EST) From: Mitch Collinsworth To: Corey Ralph Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bind problems In-Reply-To: <20010213132600.F99396@corey.datafast.net.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Well as you might guess I'm just grasping at straws here. And well, I'm running out of straws. How about this. Is the serial number in the zone file on the primary greater than the serial number on the secondary? -Mitch On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Corey Ralph wrote: > It is running as root. > > Cheers, > Corey > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 09:21:50PM -0500, Mitch Collinsworth wrote: > > OK, how about checking what user named is running as, and then > > checking your zone files and their directory to make sure that > > user has read/write access. > > > > -Mitch > > > > > > On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Corey Ralph wrote: > > > > > Mitch, > > > > > > I originally installed from the freebsd base system, and have done a > > > make world to update it before. This time I just applied the binary > > > update that was with the advisory. > > > > > > I think it is using the right .conf though, because it is serving > > > queries, just not updating the zones. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Corey Ralph > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 08:21:36PM -0500, Mitch Collinsworth wrote: > > > > Did you install from the freebsd port or from the ISC source? > > > > Was your previous install from the same source? They (last time > > > > I looked, admittedly a few months back) look in different places > > > > for their configuration file. Maybe you're not reading the .conf > > > > (or .boot) file you think you are? > > > > > > > > -Mitch > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Corey Ralph wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > I am having a problem with one of my nameservers since upgrading bind > > > > > after the advisory last week. > > > > > > > > > > It runs slave for all our zones. It has stopped updating its zone > > > > > files. Doing it manually using /usr/libexec/named-xfer works fine. I > > > > > tried setting the path to it in the options just incase it was looking > > > > > in the wrong place, that didn't help. There are no relevant messages in > > > > > the logs. > > > > > > > > > > Has anybody seen this before? > > > > > > > > > > Also, I am considering switching to djbdns to avoid this constant > > > > > upgrading. Any experiences with this? Would bind 9 be a better choice? > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > Corey Ralph > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Feb 12 19: 2:27 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from thehousleys.net (frenchknot.ne.mediaone.net [24.147.224.201]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BA2637B491 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 19:02:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from thehousleys.net (baby.int.thehousleys.net [192.168.0.24]) by thehousleys.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f1D32GJ95661; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 22:02:16 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jim@thehousleys.net) Message-ID: <3A88A3B8.BBC11D75@thehousleys.net> Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 22:02:16 -0500 From: James Housley X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Corey Ralph , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bind problems References: <20010213120914.B99396@corey.datafast.net.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Corey Ralph wrote: > > Hi all, > > I am having a problem with one of my nameservers since upgrading bind > after the advisory last week. > > It runs slave for all our zones. It has stopped updating its zone > files. Doing it manually using /usr/libexec/named-xfer works fine. I > tried setting the path to it in the options just incase it was looking > in the wrong place, that didn't help. There are no relevant messages in > the logs. I might be seeing a similar problem. Since I upgraded to 8.2.3 via CVSup in 4.2-STABLE some of my secondaries are suddenly saying my unpublished master is no longer authorative for some of my domains. I am getting "Received NOTIFY answer (!AA)" messages in my notify log. Jim -- /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign . \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail . X - NO Word docs in e-mail . / \ ----------------------------------------------------------------- jeh@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power to Serve jim@TheHousleys.Net http://www.TheHousleys.net --------------------------------------------------------------------- Your mouse has moved. Windows NT must be restarted for the change to take effect! Reboot now? [OK] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Feb 12 19:37:24 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mercury.ccmr.cornell.edu (mercury.ccmr.cornell.edu [128.84.231.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFC5137B491 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 19:37:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from ruby.ccmr.cornell.edu (IDENT:0@ruby.ccmr.cornell.edu [128.84.231.115]) by mercury.ccmr.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA12798; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 22:37:17 -0500 Received: from localhost (mitch@localhost) by ruby.ccmr.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA13455; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 22:37:15 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: ruby.ccmr.cornell.edu: mitch owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 22:37:15 -0500 (EST) From: Mitch Collinsworth To: Corey Ralph Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bind problems In-Reply-To: <20010213140321.A99212@corey.datafast.net.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org This does sound like the same problem Jim Housley just reported, assuming by "unpublished" he means "not yet delegated from the parent zone". And it's worrisome to me since there are several domains here intentionally configured the same way, and which have been running that way happily for a few years now. (Authoritative servers are all secondaries, transferring data from a primary that's not authoritative.) This has the scent of a new "default" security measure that is hopefully overridable with a config option. Time to dig into the bind docs and see what's changed. Or ask on bind-users. -Mitch On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Corey Ralph wrote: > Most of them aren't yet on the secondary at all. > > I have put them into the named.conf and issued a named.reload. > > They are serving OK from the primary, but aunic require primary and the > secondary to be functioning to delegate a domain. > > Corey > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 09:50:37PM -0500, Mitch Collinsworth wrote: > > > > Well as you might guess I'm just grasping at straws here. And well, > > I'm running out of straws. How about this. Is the serial number in > > the zone file on the primary greater than the serial number on the > > secondary? > > > > -Mitch > > > > > > On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Corey Ralph wrote: > > > > > It is running as root. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > Corey > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 09:21:50PM -0500, Mitch Collinsworth wrote: > > > > OK, how about checking what user named is running as, and then > > > > checking your zone files and their directory to make sure that > > > > user has read/write access. > > > > > > > > -Mitch > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Corey Ralph wrote: > > > > > > > > > Mitch, > > > > > > > > > > I originally installed from the freebsd base system, and have done a > > > > > make world to update it before. This time I just applied the binary > > > > > update that was with the advisory. > > > > > > > > > > I think it is using the right .conf though, because it is serving > > > > > queries, just not updating the zones. > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > Corey Ralph > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2001 at 08:21:36PM -0500, Mitch Collinsworth wrote: > > > > > > Did you install from the freebsd port or from the ISC source? > > > > > > Was your previous install from the same source? They (last time > > > > > > I looked, admittedly a few months back) look in different places > > > > > > for their configuration file. Maybe you're not reading the .conf > > > > > > (or .boot) file you think you are? > > > > > > > > > > > > -Mitch > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Corey Ralph wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I am having a problem with one of my nameservers since upgrading bind > > > > > > > after the advisory last week. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It runs slave for all our zones. It has stopped updating its zone > > > > > > > files. Doing it manually using /usr/libexec/named-xfer works fine. I > > > > > > > tried setting the path to it in the options just incase it was looking > > > > > > > in the wrong place, that didn't help. There are no relevant messages in > > > > > > > the logs. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Has anybody seen this before? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Also, I am considering switching to djbdns to avoid this constant > > > > > > > upgrading. Any experiences with this? Would bind 9 be a better choice? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > Corey Ralph > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > > > > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Feb 12 20:31:59 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mercury.ccmr.cornell.edu (mercury.ccmr.cornell.edu [128.84.231.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B32737B503 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 20:31:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from ruby.ccmr.cornell.edu (IDENT:0@ruby.ccmr.cornell.edu [128.84.231.115]) by mercury.ccmr.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA13370; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 23:31:54 -0500 Received: from localhost (mitch@localhost) by ruby.ccmr.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA13654; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 23:31:53 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: ruby.ccmr.cornell.edu: mitch owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 23:31:53 -0500 (EST) From: Mitch Collinsworth To: James Housley Cc: Corey Ralph , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bind problems In-Reply-To: <3A88A3B8.BBC11D75@thehousleys.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, James Housley wrote: > I might be seeing a similar problem. Since I upgraded to 8.2.3 via > CVSup in 4.2-STABLE some of my secondaries are suddenly saying my > unpublished master is no longer authorative for some of my domains. I > am getting "Received NOTIFY answer (!AA)" messages in my notify log. Well this one seems to be addressed in the CHANGES file. Entry 1025, prior to the 8.2.3-T6B release says: 1025. [proto] NOTIFY messages should have AA. Not much to go on there. Sounds like somebody didn't like the idea of sending NOTIFY's if you aren't authoritative. I don't know if this is stated in an RFC somewhere or if it was a developer decision. I think there may be a case for arguing this is unnecessarily restrictive, though there might also be a case for arguing it's a security issue or potential DOS. The place to take it up is probably bind-users. -Mitch To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Mon Feb 12 20:48:36 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mercury.ccmr.cornell.edu (mercury.ccmr.cornell.edu [128.84.231.97]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B82237B491 for ; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 20:48:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from ruby.ccmr.cornell.edu (IDENT:0@ruby.ccmr.cornell.edu [128.84.231.115]) by mercury.ccmr.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA13547; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 23:48:32 -0500 Received: from localhost (mitch@localhost) by ruby.ccmr.cornell.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA13690; Mon, 12 Feb 2001 23:48:31 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: ruby.ccmr.cornell.edu: mitch owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 23:48:31 -0500 (EST) From: Mitch Collinsworth To: James Housley Cc: Corey Ralph , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Bind problems In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, Mitch Collinsworth wrote: > On Mon, 12 Feb 2001, James Housley wrote: > > > I might be seeing a similar problem. Since I upgraded to 8.2.3 via > > CVSup in 4.2-STABLE some of my secondaries are suddenly saying my > > unpublished master is no longer authorative for some of my domains. I > > am getting "Received NOTIFY answer (!AA)" messages in my notify log. > > Well this one seems to be addressed in the CHANGES file. Entry 1025, > prior to the 8.2.3-T6B release says: > > 1025. [proto] NOTIFY messages should have AA. > > Not much to go on there. Sounds like somebody didn't like the idea > of sending NOTIFY's if you aren't authoritative. I don't know if > this is stated in an RFC somewhere or if it was a developer decision. > I think there may be a case for arguing this is unnecessarily > restrictive, though there might also be a case for arguing it's a > security issue or potential DOS. The place to take it up is probably > bind-users. Replying to myself here, it seems I should have finished reading the CHANGES file before firing this off. Further along are these entries: 1037. [support] soften #1025 -- continue to accept !AA notify req's. 1055. [bug] aa was being cleared on notify "queries" prior to testing. 1037 seems to support my argument that 1025 was a mistake. But your logs seem to indicate the reversal of 1025 didn't take. Not sure what 1055 is trying to say. Probably time to write to bind-users. -Mitch To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Feb 13 4:13: 3 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from harp.wrdp.com (harp.dublin.wrdp.net [212.147.130.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7543137B491 for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 04:13:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from JRAFTERY (jraftery.dublin.wrdp.net [172.16.4.52]) by harp.wrdp.com (Postfix) with SMTP id BC58910ACA; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 12:12:49 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <006f01c095b6$a3b46930$340410ac@JRAFTERY> From: "James Raftery" To: "James Housley" , "Corey Ralph" , References: <20010213120914.B99396@corey.datafast.net.au> <3A88A3B8.BBC11D75@thehousleys.net> Subject: Re: Bind problems Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 12:15:22 -0000 Organization: Worldport Communications Inc MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Housley" To: "Corey Ralph" ; Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 3:02 AM Subject: Re: Bind problems > Since I upgraded to 8.2.3 via > CVSup in 4.2-STABLE some of my secondaries are suddenly saying my > unpublished master is no longer authorative for some of my domains. 8.2.3 fiex some parser bugs that were present in previous versions. Therefore it will refuse to load a zone on the basis of a syntax error even tough it loaded on versions before 8.2.3. When a zone load fails BIND stops serving authoritatively. When this happens, your slaves cannot zone transfer. Check the logs on your master server and fix whatever errors are preventing it loading the zone. Then reload the master and reload the slaves. > I am getting "Received NOTIFY answer (!AA)" messages in my notify log Unrelated. Versions of BIND before 8.2.3 didn't implement NOTIFY properly (it didn't set the AA bit on NOTIFY 'queries'). BIND 8.2.3 logs when it sees a NOTIFY with such a problem (it still acts on them though). Regards, james To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Feb 13 5:25:56 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from 1-iron.tatnet.com (1-iron.tatnet.com [207.239.107.140]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4A9637B491 for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 05:25:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from dlfnew (davidf.int.tatnet.com [192.168.1.93]) by 1-iron.tatnet.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id IAA62960; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 08:25:48 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from dlf@tatnet.com) From: "David L. Fehrenbacher" To: "'Bryan Bunch'" , Subject: RE: Sendmail Question.. Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 08:22:22 -0500 Message-ID: <001c01c095c0$00229620$5d01a8c0@int.tatnet.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello: I believe there is a setting in /etc/mail/sendmail.cf: #O DontProbeInterfaces -or- DontProbeInterfaces=True - not sure which one goes with which version, but uncommenting/setting this line will likely fix your problem. I remember struggling with this a while back. -David -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG [mailto:owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Bryan Bunch Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 3:30 PM To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Sendmail Question.. Hello ALl, I have a quick question about sendmail. I have a machine that is running v 8.11.2 with the following features: FEATURE(access_db)dnl FEATURE(mailertable)dnl FEATURE(virtusertable)dnl FEATURE(domaintable)dnl This server is primarily a web server (web_server), but does outgoing email through the usage of cgi scripts, etc. I have one particular web site say xyz.com that is on this machine, but all of the email for the domain is handled by another machine (mail_server). There is an A record set up in DNS that points xyz.com to the (web_server) machine. This is so that if someone just types in xyz.com in their web browser, they will get the web site. I have a MX record that points to the (mail_server) machine. If a CGI script or if I try to send mail from the (web_server) machine, for some reason it thinks that it is local for the xyz.com domain, even though I do NOT have it listed in my local-host-names file. If am at any other machine mail works fine and gets routed to the proper machine. I'm assuming that this has something do to with the A record of xyz.com that points to (web_server). I have tried an entry in my mailertable: .xyz.com smtp:mail_server This does not work. The only way that I have worked around the problem is by putting an entry in my virtusertable that maps specific users to the correct user on the (mail_server) machine. There must be a simpler way. TIA.. Bryan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Feb 13 6:39:35 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from sai.co.za (mail.sai.co.za [196.33.40.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB08937B491 for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 06:39:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from dave ([196.33.40.17]) by mail.sai.co.za (SBMail MTA v2.11(1135) SMTPD32) with ESMTP id AA9376; for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 16:37:38 0200 (South Africa Standard Time) From: "David Wilson" To: , Cc: "Dennis" , "FreeBSD Mailing List" , , Subject: RE: [technical] Transparent proxying with delay pools based on IP precedence bit Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 16:38:52 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi Henrik, Dennis & all. Thanks for getting back to me. >Please note that due to the way delay pools operates, they are quite >likely more efficient than any packet based bandwidth limiting. Delay >pools operates at the application level, with no TCP overhead due to >extra retransmissions or whatever. Yes true ! I believe that Squid really works well with delay pools but how do we discriminate and limit our clients international bandwidth separately from their Local bandwidth, which is sold to them at different prices, and at the same time allow them to reap the benefits of using a transparent Squid cache on our network ? -----Original Message----- From: technical@pmburg.co.za [mailto:technical@pmburg.co.za]On Behalf Of Henrik Nordstrom Sent: 13 February 2001 01:21 To: technical@pmburg.co.za Cc: Dennis; FreeBSD Mailing List; squid-users@ircache.net; technical@sai.co.za Subject: [technical] Transparent proxying with delay pools based on IP precedence bit David Wilson wrote: > >we could do that in our etbwmgr product for freebsd. > That would be great ! Especially if it could somehow interface with Squid so > that any Cache hits would not be bandwidth limited, but TCP_MISS's would be > pulled down at the bandwidth specified for that particular client, 16K if it > was and international site or 64K if it was a local site... all based on > precedence bit. Please note that due to the way delay pools operates, they are quite likely more efficient than any packet based bandwidth limiting. Delay pools operates at the application level, with no TCP overhead due to extra retransmissions or whatever. -- Henrik Nordstrom Squid hacker To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Feb 13 6:47:44 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from sm5.texas.rr.com (sm5.texas.rr.com [24.93.35.219]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E318A37B503 for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 06:47:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from bryanhome (cs164208-129.jam.rr.com [24.164.208.129]) by sm5.texas.rr.com (8.11.0/8.11.1) with SMTP id f1DEjce25246; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 08:45:38 -0600 From: "Bryan Bunch" To: "David L. Fehrenbacher" , Subject: RE: Sendmail Question.. Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 08:47:37 -0600 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <001c01c095c0$00229620$5d01a8c0@int.tatnet.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org That fixed the problem. Thaks for your Help. Bryan > -----Original Message----- > From: David L. Fehrenbacher [mailto:dlf@tatnet.com] > Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2001 7:22 AM > To: 'Bryan Bunch'; freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: RE: Sendmail Question.. > > > Hello: > > I believe there is a setting in /etc/mail/sendmail.cf: > > #O DontProbeInterfaces > -or- > DontProbeInterfaces=True > > - not sure which one goes with which version, but uncommenting/setting this > line will likely fix your problem. I remember struggling with this a while > back. > > -David > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG > [mailto:owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Bryan Bunch > Sent: Monday, February 12, 2001 3:30 PM > To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Sendmail Question.. > > > Hello ALl, > > I have a quick question about sendmail. > > I have a machine that is running v 8.11.2 with the following features: > > FEATURE(access_db)dnl > FEATURE(mailertable)dnl > FEATURE(virtusertable)dnl > FEATURE(domaintable)dnl > > This server is primarily a web server (web_server), but does outgoing email > through the usage of cgi scripts, etc. > > I have one particular web site say xyz.com that is on this machine, but all > of > the email for the domain is handled by another machine (mail_server). > > There is an A record set up in DNS that points xyz.com to the (web_server) > machine. This is so that if someone just types in xyz.com in their web > browser, > they will get the web site. I have a MX record that points to the > (mail_server) > machine. > > If a CGI script or if I try to send mail from the (web_server) machine, for > some > reason it thinks that it is local for the xyz.com domain, even though I do > NOT > have it listed in my local-host-names file. If am at any other machine mail > works fine and gets routed to the proper machine. I'm assuming that this has > something do to with the A record of xyz.com that points to (web_server). I > have > tried an entry in my mailertable: > > .xyz.com smtp:mail_server > > This does not work. The only way that I have worked around the problem is by > putting an entry in my virtusertable that maps specific users to the correct > user on the (mail_server) machine. > > There must be a simpler way. > > TIA.. > > > Bryan > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Feb 13 9:35:39 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from etinc.com (et-gw.etinc.com [207.252.1.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94CF637B491; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 09:35:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from dbsys.etinc.com (dbsys.etinc.com [207.252.1.18]) by etinc.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA63815; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 12:42:00 GMT (envelope-from dennis@etinc.com) Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.0.20010213124015.02572a40@mail.etinc.com> X-Sender: dennis@mail.etinc.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0 Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 12:47:34 -0500 To: Julian Elischer From: Dennis Subject: Re: ADSL and PPPoE question Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, isp@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <3A88A3DC.19B01FEA@elischer.org> References: <20768358.981997424567.JavaMail.imail@seamore.excite.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 10:02 PM 02/12/2001, Julian Elischer wrote: >kiguchi@excite.com wrote: > > > > On Mon, 12 Feb 2001 08:20:55 -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > > > kiguchi@excite.com wrote: > > > > > > > > I'm very sorry if this is a stupid question. > > > > > > > > In our company, we want to set up a small network of about 20 PCs. > > ADSL > > > > seems like a good inexpensive solution, and I understand that FreeBSD > > with > > > > Netgraph can act like a gateway for our computers. > > > > > > are they in different places? > > > > No - the same place. > > > > > Negraph/ppp can act as a gateway for pppoe connections but I am not sure > > > how that helps you. How do you get the ADSL sessions to terminate on > > > an ethernet in your office? > > > (does your ISP provide that service?) The "way" do to this is by getting a frame T1 and running a DLCI to each of your customers, and do ethernet bridging over the frame. You have 1 line into your hub and you can service many customers on the frame. We have customers services 200+ customers on a single T1 and 800+ and a T3. A cisco 1600 will choke at about 150 customers (and perform like crap as you approach it). Dennis > > > > > > > > What I don't understand is whether we will have to use IP aliasing > > (NAT) or > > > > we can have our own routable IP range. > > > > > > That very much depends on what you think the topology looks like.? > > > > I thought something like this: > > > > [ISP] > > | > > | > > ----------------- > > Office [ADSL] > > | > > | > > [FreeBSD Box] > > | | | | > > | | | | > > [A][B][C][D] > > > > where A, B, C, D all have their own routable IPs. So according to > what you > > said, FreeBSD would need to establish a separate PPPoE session for each of > > the computers A, B, C and D, provided the ISP supports multiple PPPoE > > sessions over the single ADSL line? > >no that would give 4 connections to the FreeBSD machine, and not 4 >connections to the client machines. Does your ISP even use PPPoE? >it is possible to have ADSL without it.. > > > > > I need to know if this configuration is possible, so I will know what > to ask > > the ISP sales and support people. So far they haven't been very helpful. > > > > Thank you very much for your reply > > >what the ISP will try sell you will be: > > > [ISP] > > | > > | > > ----------------- > > Office [ADSL] > > | > > | <--------ethernet > +--+--+--+ > > | | | | > > | | | | > > [A][B][C][D] > >which is quite possible with ethernet attached ADSL modems. > >this might even be an ok way for you to go, >but the client machines will be 'vulnerable' on the network to >hackers. > > >A more common answer is: > > [ISP] > > | > > | > > ----------------- > > Office [ADSL] > > | > > | <--------ethernet > > [FreeBSD Box] > > | | | | > > | | | | > > [A][B][C][D] > >where the freebsd box does NAT and the other machines have addresses >assigned in the 10.x.x.x space or 192.168.x.x space. >this gives you some protection of the client boxes. > >-- > __--_|\ Julian Elischer > / \ julian@elischer.org > ( OZ ) World tour 2000-2001 >---> X_.---._/ > v > > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Feb 13 12:26:19 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from oneway.com (daedal.oneway.com [205.252.89.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C35EE37B4EC for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 12:26:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (jay@localhost) by oneway.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA81236 for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 15:29:57 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jay@oneway.com) Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 15:29:57 -0500 (EST) From: Jay Kuri To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Status of Union Filesystem Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi there, Does anyone know the status of the Union filesystem? The LINT kernel has it placed with the 'OK' filesystems.. but there is a disclaimer that says it is buggy. I have seen a few posts that say that it works fine... and one that says work has been done on it recently, but the man page says it's broken. Does anyone know the true status of the union filesystem? Has anyone used it in production recently? Thanks, Jay - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - UNIX: because reboots are for hardware upgrades Jay Kuri jay@oneway.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Feb 13 12:55:31 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from workhorse.iMach.com (workhorse.iMach.com [206.127.77.89]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8188437B491 for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 12:55:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (forrestc@localhost) by workhorse.iMach.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA02972; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 13:50:37 -0700 (MST) Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 13:50:36 -0700 (MST) From: "Forrest W. Christian" To: Jay Kuri Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Status of Union Filesystem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Jay Kuri wrote: > Does anyone know the true status of the union filesystem? Has anyone used > it in production recently? I know this isn't what you asked, but is there a reason you aren't considering using vinum? - Forrest W. Christian (forrestc@imach.com) AC7DE ---------------------------------------------------------------------- iMach, Ltd., P.O. Box 5749, Helena, MT 59604 http://www.imach.com Solutions for your high-tech problems. (406)-442-6648 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Feb 13 12:56:52 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from workhorse.iMach.com (workhorse.iMach.com [206.127.77.89]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26CA437B4EC for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 12:56:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (forrestc@localhost) by workhorse.iMach.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA02984; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 13:52:06 -0700 (MST) Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 13:52:06 -0700 (MST) From: "Forrest W. Christian" To: Jay Kuri Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Status of Union Filesystem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Ok, I am an idiot. The UNION filesystem is NOT what I was thinking it was.... Don't know where the heck I got the idea that the Union Filesystem permitted a fs to span multiple disks. On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Jay Kuri wrote: > Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 15:29:57 -0500 (EST) > From: Jay Kuri > To: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Status of Union Filesystem > > > Hi there, > > Does anyone know the status of the Union filesystem? The LINT kernel has > it placed with the 'OK' filesystems.. but there is a disclaimer that says > it is buggy. I have seen a few posts that say that it works fine... and > one that says work has been done on it recently, but the man page says > it's broken. > > Does anyone know the true status of the union filesystem? Has anyone used > it in production recently? > > Thanks, > > Jay > > - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - > UNIX: because reboots are for hardware upgrades > > Jay Kuri jay@oneway.com > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > - Forrest W. Christian (forrestc@imach.com) AC7DE ---------------------------------------------------------------------- iMach, Ltd., P.O. Box 5749, Helena, MT 59604 http://www.imach.com Solutions for your high-tech problems. (406)-442-6648 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Feb 13 13:32:29 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from actionbase.se (xanadu.actionbase.se [195.67.32.61]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECCE337B491 for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 13:32:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from henrik.localdomain ([192.168.1.242]) by actionbase.se (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with ESMTP id WAA04929; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 22:09:12 +0100 Received: from henrik.localdomain (IDENT:henrik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by henrik.localdomain (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id VAA18981; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 21:28:00 +0100 Message-ID: <3A8998CF.5DB47E53@hem.passagen.se> Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 21:27:59 +0100 From: Henrik Nordstrom X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i586) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Wilson Cc: technical@pmburg.co.za, Dennis , FreeBSD Mailing List , squid-users@ircache.net, technical@sai.co.za Subject: Re: [technical] Transparent proxying with delay pools based on IP precedence bit References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org You can have differen delay_pool settings for different traffic classes, and use delay_access to select the appropriate pool. The question is how to select the appropriate pool... -- Henrik Nordstrom David Wilson wrote: > Yes true ! I believe that Squid really works well with delay pools but how > do we discriminate and limit our clients international bandwidth separately > from their Local bandwidth, which is sold to them at different prices, and > at the same time allow them to reap the benefits of using a transparent > Squid cache on our network ? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Feb 13 13:49:49 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from oneway.com (daedal.oneway.com [205.252.89.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7D2A37B67D for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 13:49:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (jay@localhost) by oneway.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA81547; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 16:53:14 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jay@oneway.com) Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 16:53:14 -0500 (EST) From: Jay Kuri To: "Forrest W. Christian" Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Status of Union Filesystem In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > The UNION filesystem is NOT what I was thinking it was.... > > Don't know where the heck I got the idea that the Union Filesystem > permitted a fs to span multiple disks. Probably from the name. =) but yeah... It's the overlapping filesystem type thing I'm interested in. I keep seeing people say 'I use it for xy.' but those warnings are mighty scary. Jay - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - UNIX: because reboots are for hardware upgrades Jay Kuri jay@oneway.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Tue Feb 13 23: 6:39 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from www.golsyd.net.au (golsyd.net.au [203.57.20.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14F5D37B491 for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 23:06:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from [203.164.12.28] by www.quake.com.au (NTMail 4.30.0012/AB6169.63.5724aadf) with ESMTP id plfaaaaa for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 18:05:58 +1100 Message-ID: <3A8A2EC1.4DBF543B@quake.com.au> Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 18:07:45 +1100 From: Kal Torak X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD-isp Subject: FreeBSD /w NT domain Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi everyone, I have been asked to setup a linux server as the "domain" controller for some NT workstations... I am planning to use FreeBSD instead, but I dont really have much knowledge or experience with NT, let alone making it work with FreeBSD! I know that doing this is a fairly common thing so the lusers can have there little gui, and we still have our unix servers, but Im not totally sure whats going to be involved in this, since they will want most of the "features" of an NT server working, like having office and all those apps on the server... Anyway I was hoping someone could point me in the right direction for some info on this type of thing, or give me any tips on the subject :) Like security issues with the things I will need to use like samba etc. Thanks! Kal. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Feb 14 5: 4:43 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mail.k2access.net (mail.k2access.net [63.140.99.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7F0137B491 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 05:04:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from mephisto ([208.41.204.124]) by mail.k2access.net (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-59171U1000L100S0V35) with SMTP id net for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 07:03:48 -0600 Reply-To: From: "Eric D. Stanfield" To: "FreeBSD-isp" Subject: RE: FreeBSD /w NT domain Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 07:04:36 -0600 Message-ID: <002401c09686$ae866040$7ccc29d0@thestanfields.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) In-Reply-To: <3A8A2EC1.4DBF543B@quake.com.au> X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Not sure how this questions falls under the freebsd-"isp" category, but honestly the best place to go read up on your scenario is www.samba.org. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG > [mailto:owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Kal Torak > Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 1:08 AM > To: FreeBSD-isp > Subject: FreeBSD /w NT domain > > > Hi everyone, > > I have been asked to setup a linux server as the "domain" controller > for some NT workstations... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Feb 14 5:25: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from www.golsyd.net.au (mail.golsyd.net.au [203.57.20.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 745AE37B401 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 05:25:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from [203.164.12.28] by www.quake.com.au (NTMail 4.30.0012/AB6169.63.5724aadf) with ESMTP id iofaaaaa for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 00:24:26 +1100 Message-ID: <3A8A8776.B4F92B3A@quake.com.au> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 00:26:14 +1100 From: Kal Torak X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: exs@kka.com Cc: FreeBSD-isp Subject: Re: FreeBSD /w NT domain References: <002401c09686$ae866040$7ccc29d0@thestanfields.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Well I would post under freebsd-"nt" category, but there isnt one. "Eric D. Stanfield" wrote: > > Not sure how this questions falls under the freebsd-"isp" category, but > honestly the best place to go read up on your scenario is www.samba.org. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG > > [mailto:owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Kal Torak > > Sent: Wednesday, February 14, 2001 1:08 AM > > To: FreeBSD-isp > > Subject: FreeBSD /w NT domain > > > > > > Hi everyone, > > > > I have been asked to setup a linux server as the "domain" controller > > for some NT workstations... > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Feb 14 7: 9:16 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from apotheosis.org.za (apotheosis.org.za [137.158.128.27]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D217737B65D for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 07:08:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 17:07:27 +0200 From: Matthew West To: Kal Torak Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD /w NT domain Message-ID: <20010214170727.A94987@apotheosis.org.za> References: <3A8A2EC1.4DBF543B@quake.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3A8A2EC1.4DBF543B@quake.com.au>; from "Kal Torak" on Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 06:07:45PM Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 06:07:45PM +1100, Kal Torak wrote: > I have been asked to setup a linux server as the "domain" controller > for some NT workstations... > > I am planning to use FreeBSD instead, but I dont really have much > knowledge or experience with NT, let alone making it work with > FreeBSD! You might want to try samba, although it falls a bit short of being a fully fledged PDC. It's in the ports collection. There's also Samba TNG and although it's not yet in the ports tree, it does seem to have all the functionality you'd want from a PDC. If you're feeling daring, you might also want to try setting up Windows 2000 to use a Kerberos V KDC to do authentication. -- mwest@uct.ac.za To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Feb 14 7:42:15 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from chuck.t0.or.at (chuck.t0.or.at [195.230.45.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33D4137B401 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 07:42:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (mic@localhost) by chuck.t0.or.at (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f1EFg9e20178 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 16:42:09 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 16:42:09 +0100 (CET) From: Michael Dosser To: FreeBSD-isp Subject: Re: FreeBSD /w NT domain In-Reply-To: <3A8A2EC1.4DBF543B@quake.com.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 14 Feb 2001, Kal Torak wrote: > I am planning to use FreeBSD instead, but I dont really have much > knowledge or experience with NT, let alone making it work with FreeBSD! I have set up samba as standalone server and within a nt-domain on slackware linux and freebsd 3.4/4.2 without any bigger efforts. My starting point was reading man-pages and doc @ http://www.samba.org. A good starting point is also: http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/samba/chapter/book/index.html Cheers,mic -- Michael Dosser http://sinn-haft.action.at To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Feb 14 8:31:28 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from kouros.carson.net (dialupE94.mssl.uswest.net [209.180.186.94]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AB3B37B491 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 08:31:20 -0800 (PST) Received: (from noc@localhost) by kouros.carson.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) id f1EGUXF10848 for freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 09:30:33 -0700 (MST) Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 09:30:33 -0700 From: Navan Carson To: FreeBSD-isp Subject: Re: FreeBSD /w NT domain Message-ID: <20010214093033.A16676@yahoo.com> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD-isp References: <3A8A2EC1.4DBF543B@quake.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3A8A2EC1.4DBF543B@quake.com.au>; from kaltorak@quake.com.au on Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 06:07:45PM +1100 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi Kal, This is (mostly) a Samba job. Try the web site, and/or a good book. I have been using "Samba Administrator's Handbook" by Ed Brooksbank, and others, from M&T Books. Also, I read a review of a new book that looks interesting. The review is at: http://www.linuxiso.org/bookreviews/freebsd-corp-network.html HtH On Wed, Feb 14, 2001 at 06:07:45PM +1100, Kal Torak wrote (edited): > I have been asked to setup a linux server as the "domain" controller > for some NT workstations... > > I am planning to use FreeBSD instead, but I dont really have much > knowledge or experience with NT, let alone making it work with FreeBSD! -- No problem is so formidable that you can't just walk away from it. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Feb 14 9:56:56 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from heorot.1nova.com (sub24-23.member.dsl-only.net [63.105.24.23]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F9937B491 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 09:56:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by heorot.1nova.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7B7CA18BF; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 10:20:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by heorot.1nova.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 728DF18BE; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 10:20:43 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 13 Feb 2001 10:20:43 -0800 (PST) From: Rick Hamell To: Kal Torak Cc: FreeBSD-isp Subject: Re: FreeBSD /w NT domain In-Reply-To: <3A8A2EC1.4DBF543B@quake.com.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Anyway I was hoping someone could point me in the right direction for > some info on this type of thing, or give me any tips on the subject :) > Like security issues with the things I will need to use like samba etc. I've found Ted Middlestadt's Book pretty helpful for this... "The Corporate Networkers Guide." :) Rick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Wed Feb 14 15:50:45 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from smtp1.amigo.net (smtp1.amigo.net [209.94.64.30]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69F2737B401 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 15:50:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from amigo.net (billing.amigo.net [209.94.67.250]) by smtp1.amigo.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f1ENpW253795 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 16:51:33 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from randys@amigo.net) Message-ID: <3A8B1A01.7000108@amigo.net> Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 16:51:29 -0700 From: Randy Smith User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE i386; en-US; 0.7) Gecko/20010112 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: NFS Union mounts Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi all, Here's the background: I am setting a backup mail server. I want my main server to keep the files locally but write all of the changes to an NFS drive at the same time. My backup server should then be able to read the data from the NFS drive if the main server goes down. Here are my questions: Can I setup NFS with a union mount so that if the server writes to /var/mail to is written to a local copy that is accessed as /var/mail but is also written to the NFS server (transparently) as /var/mail? Can the NFS mount be write only? I want to read from the local copy but write to both the local copy and the NFS. I have not been able to find any docs on union mounts for FreeBSD. (BSD/OS had and option for this.) Is it even possible to do what I propose? Thanks in advance. -- Randy Smith Amigo.Net Systems Administrator 719-589-6100 ext. 4185 http://www.amigo.net/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Feb 15 2:37:25 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from ns.new-wen.net (ns.new-wen.net [212.72.64.100]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1622837B401 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 02:37:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from new-wen.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns.new-wen.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA20302 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 11:37:19 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from deuerl@new-wen.net) Message-Id: <200102151037.LAA20302@ns.new-wen.net> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 10:37:19 -0000 To: Subject: content-security solution available From: X-Mailer: TWIG 2.5.1 X-Client-IP: 195.243.0.3 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello, sorry this is a bit off topic... Does anyone know a product for content-filtering ... maybe freebsd-based :) ? What i want to do is filter out unwanted content, based on binary inspection, e.g. executables,mp3,video,sound, Java, Java-Script, ActiveX or any content i dislike. It should work together with our existing proxy and firewall solution. Anyone got an idea ? Regards Robert To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Feb 15 2:42: 9 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from sai.co.za (mail.sai.co.za [196.33.40.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7089B37B4EC for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 02:42:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from dave ([196.33.40.17]) by mail.sai.co.za (SBMail MTA v2.11(1142) SMTPD32) with ESMTP id AA9376; for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 12:40:47 0200 (South Africa Standard Time) From: "David Wilson" To: "FreeBSD Mailing List" Cc: Subject: Bind pinging ? Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 12:42:05 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00D4_01C0974C.B45E6E10" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_00D4_01C0974C.B45E6E10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi guys, A quick question, why do our bind 8 DNS ping servers continously try and ping our clients and visa versa ? #Sample# Feb 15 12:26:30 firewall kernel: Packet log: output DENY ppp0 PROTO=1 10.0.0.1:3 10.0.0.2:3 L=404 S=0xC0 I=44615 F=0x0000 T=255 (#16) #/Sample# I know that Squid seems to do this too sometimes ? Is there a way to disable this, because my firewall logs get kinda large ! ;-) Any help would be appreciated, thanks. Kindest regards David Wilson The S.A Internet ------=_NextPart_000_00D4_01C0974C.B45E6E10 Content-Type: application/ms-tnef; name="winmail.dat" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="winmail.dat" eJ8+IgYKAQaQCAAEAAAAAAABAAEAAQeQBgAIAAAA5AQAAAAAAADoAAEIgAcAGAAAAElQTS5NaWNy b3NvZnQgTWFpbC5Ob3RlADEIAQ2ABAACAAAAAgACAAEGgAMADgAAANEHAgAPAAwAKgAAAAQAIwEB A5AGABgHAAAlAAAACwACAAEAAAALACMAAAAAAAMAJgAAAAAACwApAAAAAAADADYAAAAAAB4AcAAB AAAADwAAAEJpbmQgcGluZ2luZyA/AAACAXEAAQAAABYAAAABwJc78Em7j0bIR+1P4Zsnrbifeszl AAACAR0MAQAAABUAAABTTVRQOkRBVkVXQFNBSS5DTy5aQQAAAAALAAEOAAAAAEAABg4ADOrsO5fA AQIBCg4BAAAAGAAAAAAAAABqe79PPDzUEZWIABBLV6wXwoAAAAsAHw4BAAAAAgEJEAEAAAC+AgAA ugIAAIkDAABMWkZ17mEjVAMACgByY3BnMTI1FjIA+Atgbg4QMDMzTwH3AqQD4wIAY2gKwHPwZXQw IAcTAoMAUBBm2HBycQ5QEN99CoAIyPQgOwliNQBQCcMVQQoyGDE1MwKAFCJzdHnKbAeQaAngdHsH sAWwIwDAAnNzMSAXIGFkkQuAZyAxE/NcdgiQpHdrC4BkNAxgYwBQAwsDC7UgSGkgZ3U4eXMsCqIK hAqAQSA0cXUN4GscQQeQdGkBAiAsIHdoeSBkJG8gCGEgYhmRIDhoIEROBfBwGJIRIHJ+dgSQBCAF oAIwC4AIYHPybB1wdHIdcABwHjAes/kdwmNsCJACMAQgIIIZQFxzYSIAH0EiQD8beiMlBhBtC1Bl Ixt0RmUKYhjANRjAMjoyNqQ6MxFQZmkJcHcHQAUDIGsEkWVsOiBQbwDQJgAFQAkAZyZgCGB0xnAn UB5gRU5ZHqAoAIERUFBST1RPPRgw9Q9ALijiMSUwKMYk8ClgIEw9NDA0BgA9MJR4QxFQSSpANDYW MCkbdCBGKqEwLCEgVAY9DjAkwCgjMTYp7SM1LyOrG3RJJfAf0AfgdnQQ8AVAUxxRHjARIGX6bQQg dB2gHZEvQAQAMEG9HaBzA3ARMAdzIsVJMDHvFyAJcCBwHUBhICEwYSIhrwJgMsAwsh0wYgWQYR/w vTLAbR1wJXcm8QQgZybBlxmCIkALYHI14CAhFOAyLS0VQW4dcBcgbHD7HUAIYGweMDRQIHAoAAlw OmMHMHQJgB0wL0FuazxzLht6CvQvAS/AY3RnN/AKwBHxIEsZkRzRIJ0JcGcLERCwG4NEYRlAfR4w VwMQMUALkDppJgBl/nALkDsaGCAI0ABBOEAKINcsYBcgBgAuHDBJAjAmEv50Ol87ZUAgAUA4QB/Q JjC/CiABQEHJATEbgxQRAEWAAAALAAGACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAAADhQAAAAAAAAMAA4AI IAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAABCFAAAAAAAAAwAHgAggBgAAAAAAwAAAAAAAAEYAAAAAUoUAACdq AQAeAAmACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAABUhQAAAQAAAAQAAAA5LjAAHgAKgAggBgAAAAAAwAAA AAAAAEYAAAAANoUAAAEAAAABAAAAAAAAAB4AC4AIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAADeFAAABAAAA AQAAAAAAAAAeAAyACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAAA4hQAAAQAAAAEAAAAAAAAACwANgAggBgAA AAAAwAAAAAAAAEYAAAAAgoUAAAEAAAADAB2ACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAAABhQAAAAAAAAsA V4AIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAAA6FAAAAAAAAAwBZgAggBgAAAAAAwAAAAAAAAEYAAAAAEYUA AAAAAAADAFqACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAAAYhQAAAAAAAAsAlYAIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABG AAAAAAaFAAAAAAAAAgH4DwEAAAAQAAAAanu/Tzw81BGViAAQS1esFwIB+g8BAAAAEAAAAGp7v088 PNQRlYgAEEtXrBcCAfsPAQAAAJcAAAAAAAAAOKG7EAXlEBqhuwgAKypWwgAAUFNUUFJYLkRMTAAA AAAAAAAATklUQfm/uAEAqgA32W4AAABDOlxEb2N1bWVudHMgYW5kIFNldHRpbmdzXGRhdmV3XExv Y2FsIFNldHRpbmdzXEFwcGxpY2F0aW9uIERhdGFcTWljcm9zb2Z0XE91dGxvb2tcb3V0bG9vay5w c3QAAAMA/g8FAAAAAwANNP03AAACAX8AAQAAAC8AAAA8TkVCQkpGSUlHS0dMUEVCSUpBQ0xDRURQ REJBQS5kYXZld0BzYWkuY28uemE+AAADAAYQIF4hCQMABxCHAQAAAwAQEAAAAAADABEQAAAAAB4A CBABAAAAZQAAAEhJR1VZUyxBUVVJQ0tRVUVTVElPTixXSFlET09VUkJJTkQ4RE5TUElOR1NFUlZF UlNDT05USU5PVVNMWVRSWUFORFBJTkdPVVJDTElFTlRTQU5EVklTQVZFUlNBPyNTQU1QTEUAAAAA P4Y= ------=_NextPart_000_00D4_01C0974C.B45E6E10-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Feb 15 3:18:12 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from nbux.com (ASte-Genev-Bois-101-1-2-99.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.252.179.99]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1763237B491 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 03:18:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from goliath ([192.168.5.20]) by nbux.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f1FBI7a01137 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 12:18:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lifo@nbux.com) Message-ID: <015101c09741$1b6a65c0$1405a8c0@goliath> From: "lifo" To: Subject: ftpd + rdr ipfilter Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 12:19:00 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi all, i have installed a ipfilter firewall (3.4.16) on a freebsd 4.2 - stable box, i have just one external ip (by my provider). I have configured my ipfilter box with redirection, all is ok for smtp, web, pop3... But for ftpd (port 21 - 20) it can't open data connection, anyone have already configure it ? Yes i have already read ipf how-to, but it explain to configure ftpd without rdr ( with more than a single ip - or just one server without dedicated firewall...). I have a solution : it's to redirect all ftpd passives ports (49152 - 65535) BUT IT'S BAD, VERY BAD !!! ;-)) thanks in advance... -- NoThiNg BuT UniX -=- www.nbux.com -=- Powered by FreeBSD ! lifo@nbux.com -- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Feb 15 6:26:42 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mta1-svc.virgin.net (mta1-win.server.ntli.net [62.253.164.41]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0827437B491 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 06:26:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from le6q4 ([62.253.68.164]) by mta1-svc.virgin.net (InterMail vM.4.01.02.27 201-229-119-110) with SMTP id <20010215142904.VTLV22336.mta1-svc.virgin.net@le6q4> for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:29:04 +0000 Message-ID: <000801c0975a$6c9c3040$a444fd3e@le6q4> From: "KAES KTS" To: Subject: Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:20:17 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0005_01C0975A.6B98CA00" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C0975A.6B98CA00 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C0975A.6B98CA00 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
------=_NextPart_000_0005_01C0975A.6B98CA00-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Feb 15 8:26:38 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from sunny.fishnet.com (sunny.fishnet.com [209.150.200.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFF4137B4EC for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 08:26:34 -0800 (PST) Received: from walleye.corp.fishnet.com (209.150.192.114) by sunny.fishnet.com (5.0.048) id 3A8318E40005635A for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 10:26:53 -0600 Message-ID: From: "Hudson, Henrik H." To: "'freebsd-isp@freebsd.org'" Subject: Mail Server with LDAP? Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 10:30:21 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hello List- So, I want to get a mail server running that will do user auth via a LDAP server which will allow me get around the problem of A)Creating local user accounts and B) having the user at one domain not be able to have the same name as a user at another domain. or would a MySQL server work better? safer? easier? The POP server to handle this? QPopper works via a PAM module and LDAP, I think? What else? Then we need a SMTP server to handle deliveries. Will sendmail do this? NOTE: Please don't get into a security argument on this one :) Need an IMAP server too. Point me to a website with docs, etc... and I will be happy to read it :) I was paging through the openldap.org site. Looks promising... The ultimate goal is to do the above, have a webmail interface to it all and not have local user accounts. Should I say screw it and go buy something like Communigate Pro? or tinker with it? I was looking at Critical Path stuff, but Solaris or Windoze only. Enlighten me people :) Thanks! Henrik --- Henrik Hudson Microsoft: "Where would you like to go to today" Linux: "Where would you like to go tomorrow" FreeBSD: "Hey, when are you guys going to catch up" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Feb 15 8:57:47 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from alydar.infoteam.com (alydar.infoteam.com [207.246.83.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13BFB37B401 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 08:57:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by alydar.infoteam.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 344856E706; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 11:57:43 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 11:57:43 -0500 From: Kenn Martin To: "'freebsd-isp@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: Mail Server with LDAP? Message-ID: <20010215115743.B79047@infoteam.com> Mail-Followup-To: Kenn Martin , "'freebsd-isp@freebsd.org'" References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from hhudson@eschelon.com on Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 10:30:21AM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 10:30:21AM -0600, Hudson, Henrik H. wrote: > Hello List- > > So, I want to get a mail server running that will do user auth via a LDAP > server which will allow me get around the problem of A)Creating local user > accounts and B) having the user at one domain not be able to have the same > name as a user at another domain. or would a MySQL server work better? > safer? easier? > > The POP server to handle this? QPopper works via a PAM module and LDAP, I > think? What else? > > Then we need a SMTP server to handle deliveries. Will sendmail do this? > NOTE: Please don't get into a security argument on this one :) > > Need an IMAP server too. > > Point me to a website with docs, etc... and I will be happy to read it :) I > was paging through the openldap.org site. Looks promising... > > The ultimate goal is to do the above, have a webmail interface to it all and > not have local user accounts. Should I say screw it and go buy something > like Communigate Pro? or tinker with it? I was looking at Critical Path > stuff, but Solaris or Windoze only. > > Enlighten me people :) I'd recommend Postfix with LDAP and Cyrus for IMAP and POP, all available under ports. The postfix site is at http://www.postfix.org . TWIG, a great free webmail/groupware package, is available at http://twig.screwdriver.net . You will need to build apache and mod_php4, both under ports. Kenn To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Feb 15 9:11:10 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from sai.co.za (mail.sai.co.za [196.33.40.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECDDC37B4EC for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 09:11:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from dave ([196.33.40.17]) by mail.sai.co.za (SBMail MTA v2.11(1142) SMTPD32) with ESMTP id AA9376; for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 17:58:54 0200 (South Africa Standard Time) From: "David Wilson" To: "FreeBSD Mailing List" Subject: Off topic: tcoflashagent port 1975 ??? What is it ? Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 18:00:13 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0159_01C09779.25228470" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0159_01C09779.25228470 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi guys, Sorry about this "off topic" question, but what is this port used for tcoflashagent 1975/udp ?? Thanks. Kindest regards David Wilson The S.A Internet ------=_NextPart_000_0159_01C09779.25228470 Content-Type: application/ms-tnef; name="winmail.dat" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="winmail.dat" eJ8+Ig0QAQaQCAAEAAAAAAABAAEAAQeQBgAIAAAA5AQAAAAAAADoAAEIgAcAGAAAAElQTS5NaWNy b3NvZnQgTWFpbC5Ob3RlADEIAQ2ABAACAAAAAgACAAEGgAMADgAAANEHAgAPABIAAAAAAAQA/wAB A5AGAAwGAAAlAAAACwACAAEAAAALACMAAAAAAAMAJgAAAAAACwApAAAAAAADADYAAAAAAB4AcAAB AAAANAAAAE9mZiB0b3BpYzogdGNvZmxhc2hhZ2VudCBwb3J0IDE5NzUgPz8/IFdoYXQgaXMgaXQg PwACAXEAAQAAABYAAAABwJdoYTebFLJ4Jl9DOLPxg15yK2F8AAACAR0MAQAAABUAAABTTVRQOkRB VkVXQFNBSS5DTy5aQQAAAAALAAEOAAAAAEAABg4AAHtZaJfAAQIBCg4BAAAAGAAAAAAAAABqe79P PDzUEZWIABBLV6wXwoAAAAsAHw4BAAAAAgEJEAEAAACQAQAAjAEAACACAABMWkZ1vvX+iwMACgBy Y3BnMTI1FjIA+Atgbg4QMDMzTwH3AqQD4wIAY2gKwHPwZXQwIAcTAoMAUBBm2HBycQ5QEN99CoAI yPQgOwliNQBQCcMVQQoyGDE1MwKAFCJzdHnKbAeQaAngdHsHsAWwIwDAAnNzMSAXIGFkkQuAZyAx E/NcdgiQpHdrC4BkNAxgYwBQAwsDC7UgSGkgZ3W4eXMsCqIKhAqAUwWwOHJ5IAGgCGAFQHRoMQQA ICJvASAc4G9wsQ3gIiBxClAWwGkCIOgsIGIcwXcQ8AVAHRElHPNwCREgdREgZCA7AhAFwHQFoA7x FxBhZwcJ8AVAGMA5NzUvdaBkcCA/Pxt0VBDwcG5rcy4beht4CzBuwm8D8GRjdGwKsRHxrCBLGZEe ISAJcGcLEbMQsBuDRGEZQCAwVwMQ1nMCICPKawngcAuQJIqXGCAI0ABBdQlQYiAikMJlBgAuQSBJ AjAEkf8RMCPPJNUpkAFAKdAkgCrwvwogAUArOQExG4MUEQAu8AsAAYAIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABG AAAAAAOFAAAAAAAAAwADgAggBgAAAAAAwAAAAAAAAEYAAAAAEIUAAAAAAAADAAeACCAGAAAAAADA AAAAAAAARgAAAABShQAAJ2oBAB4ACYAIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAAFSFAAABAAAABAAAADku MAAeAAqACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAAA2hQAAAQAAAAEAAAAAAAAAHgALgAggBgAAAAAAwAAA AAAAAEYAAAAAN4UAAAEAAAABAAAAAAAAAB4ADIAIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAADiFAAABAAAA AQAAAAAAAAALAA2ACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAACChQAAAQAAAAMAHYAIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAA AABGAAAAAAGFAAAAAAAACwBXgAggBgAAAAAAwAAAAAAAAEYAAAAADoUAAAAAAAADAFmACCAGAAAA AADAAAAAAAAARgAAAAARhQAAAAAAAAMAWoAIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAABiFAAAAAAAACwCV gAggBgAAAAAAwAAAAAAAAEYAAAAABoUAAAAAAAACAfgPAQAAABAAAABqe79PPDzUEZWIABBLV6wX AgH6DwEAAAAQAAAAanu/Tzw81BGViAAQS1esFwIB+w8BAAAAlwAAAAAAAAA4obsQBeUQGqG7CAAr KlbCAABQU1RQUlguRExMAAAAAAAAAABOSVRB+b+4AQCqADfZbgAAAEM6XERvY3VtZW50cyBhbmQg U2V0dGluZ3NcZGF2ZXdcTG9jYWwgU2V0dGluZ3NcQXBwbGljYXRpb24gRGF0YVxNaWNyb3NvZnRc T3V0bG9va1xvdXRsb29rLnBzdAAAAwD+DwUAAAADAA00/TcAAAIBfwABAAAALwAAADxORUJCSkZJ SUdLR0xQRUJJSkFDTElFRVBEQkFBLmRhdmV3QHNhaS5jby56YT4AAAMABhCpTzs4AwAHEIMAAAAD ABAQAAAAAAMAERAAAAAAHgAIEAEAAABlAAAASElHVVlTLFNPUlJZQUJPVVRUSElTIk9GRlRPUElD IlFVRVNUSU9OLEJVVFdIQVRJU1RISVNQT1JUVVNFREZPUlRDT0ZMQVNIQUdFTlQxOTc1L1VEUD8/ VEhBTktTS0lOREVTVAAAAADxPQ== ------=_NextPart_000_0159_01C09779.25228470-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Feb 15 9:17:19 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mail.numachi.com (numachi.numachi.com [198.175.254.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 41D0337B491 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 09:17:16 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 28962 invoked by uid 3001); 15 Feb 2001 17:17:15 -0000 Received: from natto.numachi.com (198.175.254.216) by numachi.numachi.com with SMTP; 15 Feb 2001 17:17:15 -0000 Received: (qmail 46207 invoked by uid 1001); 15 Feb 2001 17:17:15 -0000 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 12:17:15 -0500 From: Brian Reichert To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: detecting uncontrolled reboot? Message-ID: <20010215121715.J91352@numachi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Can anyone think of a way, after reboot/fsck/etc, from userland, of detecting whether or not 'this' boot was the consequence of an uncontrolled reboot? I have a situation where a MySQL table usually needs repair via 'iasmchk' after such a reboot, and I only want to take the time for such a repair in that circumstance. I _suppose_ I could grovel for the /kernel: WARNING: / was not properly dismounted line out of /var/log/messages, but I would prefer something that wasn't sensitive to my syslog configuration... -- Brian 'you Bastard' Reichert 37 Crystal Ave. #303 Daytime number: (603) 434-6842 Derry NH 03038-1713 USA Intel architecture: the left-hand path To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Feb 15 9:31:12 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from andcoke.aeon.networktel.net (andcoke.aeon.networktel.net [216.83.238.151]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C77DB37B503 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 09:31:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (phill@localhost) by andcoke.aeon.networktel.net (8.11.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f1FHV0403914; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 11:31:01 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from phill@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: andcoke.aeon.networktel.net: phill owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 11:30:59 -0600 (CST) From: Phillip Salzman X-Sender: phill@andcoke.aeon.networktel.net To: "Hudson, Henrik H." Cc: "'freebsd-isp@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: Mail Server with LDAP? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org We are currently using a Qmail-based system that authenticates off of a MySQL database. User accts are administered via PHP scripts. Up until recently it was working great. Now we're having issues with the MySQL database locking the entire table whenever there is an update, such as someone changing their password. MySQL should be able to handle this whenever row level locking is introduced. Due to this problem, and a few others, we're going to be migrating to PostgreSQL. A coworker of mine has modifications to QMail's checkpassword utility on his site for database integration. http://www.pointfive.net/ --- Phillip Salzman phill@FreeBSD.Org http://www.sysctl.net/ |<- My Website. Are you scared yet? -------------------------------------------------------------- "If A equals success, then the formula is A = X + Y + Z. X is work. Y is play. Z is keep your mouth shut." -- Albert Einstein -------------------------------------------------------------- On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Hudson, Henrik H. wrote: > Hello List- > > So, I want to get a mail server running that will do user auth via a LDAP > server which will allow me get around the problem of A)Creating local user > accounts and B) having the user at one domain not be able to have the same > name as a user at another domain. or would a MySQL server work better? > safer? easier? > > The POP server to handle this? QPopper works via a PAM module and LDAP, I > think? What else? > > Then we need a SMTP server to handle deliveries. Will sendmail do this? > NOTE: Please don't get into a security argument on this one :) > > Need an IMAP server too. > > Point me to a website with docs, etc... and I will be happy to read it :) I > was paging through the openldap.org site. Looks promising... > > The ultimate goal is to do the above, have a webmail interface to it all and > not have local user accounts. Should I say screw it and go buy something > like Communigate Pro? or tinker with it? I was looking at Critical Path > stuff, but Solaris or Windoze only. > > Enlighten me people :) > > Thanks! > > Henrik > --- > Henrik Hudson > > Microsoft: "Where would you like to go to today" > Linux: "Where would you like to go tomorrow" > FreeBSD: "Hey, when are you guys going to catch up" > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Feb 15 9:57:12 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from k0dez.pbx.org (k0dez.pbx.org [216.117.63.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 107D937B65D for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 09:57:07 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gus@localhost) by k0dez.pbx.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f1FHv4f06284 for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 11:57:04 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 11:57:04 -0600 From: Gus Huber To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mail Server with LDAP? Message-ID: <20010215115703.A6251@k0dez.pbx.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from phill@FreeBSD.ORG on Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 11:30:59AM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I personaly have developed similar solutions for ISP's usingboth sendmail and DMail at different sites. Dmail appears to be the most efficient maildaemon I have used, it was also the easiest to setup, and get auth code written for. The server liscense is a bit pricey, but for DB integration it is worth it to have a user system that scales beyond a million users. gus huber On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 11:30:59AM -0600, Phillip Salzman wrote: > We are currently using a Qmail-based system that authenticates off of a > MySQL database. User accts are administered via PHP scripts. > > Up until recently it was working great. Now we're having > issues with the MySQL database locking the entire table whenever there is > an update, such as someone changing their password. MySQL should be able > to handle this whenever row level locking is introduced. > > Due to this problem, and a few others, we're going to be migrating to > PostgreSQL. > > A coworker of mine has modifications to QMail's checkpassword utility on > his site for database integration. http://www.pointfive.net/ > > --- > Phillip Salzman > phill@FreeBSD.Org > http://www.sysctl.net/ |<- My Website. Are you scared yet? > -------------------------------------------------------------- > "If A equals success, then the formula is A = X + Y + Z. X is work. Y > is play. Z is keep your mouth shut." > -- Albert Einstein > -------------------------------------------------------------- > > On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Hudson, Henrik H. wrote: > > > Hello List- > > > > So, I want to get a mail server running that will do user auth via a LDAP > > server which will allow me get around the problem of A)Creating local user > > accounts and B) having the user at one domain not be able to have the same > > name as a user at another domain. or would a MySQL server work better? > > safer? easier? > > > > The POP server to handle this? QPopper works via a PAM module and LDAP, I > > think? What else? > > > > Then we need a SMTP server to handle deliveries. Will sendmail do this? > > NOTE: Please don't get into a security argument on this one :) > > > > Need an IMAP server too. > > > > Point me to a website with docs, etc... and I will be happy to read it :) I > > was paging through the openldap.org site. Looks promising... > > > > The ultimate goal is to do the above, have a webmail interface to it all and > > not have local user accounts. Should I say screw it and go buy something > > like Communigate Pro? or tinker with it? I was looking at Critical Path > > stuff, but Solaris or Windoze only. > > > > Enlighten me people :) > > > > Thanks! > > > > Henrik > > --- > > Henrik Hudson > > > > Microsoft: "Where would you like to go to today" > > Linux: "Where would you like to go tomorrow" > > FreeBSD: "Hey, when are you guys going to catch up" > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Feb 15 10:47:46 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mail.ruhr.de (in-ruhr4.ruhr.de [212.23.134.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B6FAA37B401 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 10:47:42 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 16677 invoked by uid 10); 15 Feb 2001 18:47:39 -0000 Received: (from ue@localhost) by nathan.ruhr.de (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f1FIYhP62459 for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 19:34:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ue) Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 19:34:42 +0100 From: Udo Erdelhoff To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: detecting uncontrolled reboot? Message-ID: <20010215193442.C97705@nathan.ruhr.de> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org References: <20010215121715.J91352@numachi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010215121715.J91352@numachi.com>; from reichert@numachi.com on Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 12:17:15PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Moin, > Can anyone think of a way, after reboot/fsck/etc, from userland, > of detecting whether or not 'this' boot was the consequence of an > uncontrolled reboot? you could always use some kind of flag file. Recent versions of FreeBSD call all scripts in /usr/local/etc/rc.d/ with the argument "stop" when the system is shut down. Write a small script that creates the flag file when the script is called with the argument "stop". If the script is called with "start", check for the existence of the flag file. If it's there, the system is rebooting after a clean shutdown. If not, break out the repair tools. Please not that this isn't 100% proof. For a better solution, you should convert the flag file into an entry in your database. After all, you don't care if the system crashes, you only care if the system crashes while your database is running. /s/Udo -- Enjoy the beauty and power of root To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Feb 15 10:58:35 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from andcoke.aeon.networktel.net (andcoke.aeon.networktel.net [216.83.238.151]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8396C37B401 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 10:58:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (phill@localhost) by andcoke.aeon.networktel.net (8.11.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f1FIwQ704348; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 12:58:27 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from phill@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: andcoke.aeon.networktel.net: phill owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 12:58:26 -0600 (CST) From: Phillip Salzman X-Sender: phill@andcoke.aeon.networktel.net To: "Hudson, Henrik H." Cc: "'freebsd-isp@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: Mail Server with LDAP? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I'm sorry, the correct URL is: http://www.point-five.net/Qmail --- Phillip Salzman phill@FreeBSD.Org http://www.sysctl.net/ |<- My Website. Are you scared yet? -------------------------------------------------------------- "If A equals success, then the formula is A = X + Y + Z. X is work. Y is play. Z is keep your mouth shut." -- Albert Einstein -------------------------------------------------------------- On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Hudson, Henrik H. wrote: > Hello List- > > So, I want to get a mail server running that will do user auth via a LDAP > server which will allow me get around the problem of A)Creating local user > accounts and B) having the user at one domain not be able to have the same > name as a user at another domain. or would a MySQL server work better? > safer? easier? > > The POP server to handle this? QPopper works via a PAM module and LDAP, I > think? What else? > > Then we need a SMTP server to handle deliveries. Will sendmail do this? > NOTE: Please don't get into a security argument on this one :) > > Need an IMAP server too. > > Point me to a website with docs, etc... and I will be happy to read it :) I > was paging through the openldap.org site. Looks promising... > > The ultimate goal is to do the above, have a webmail interface to it all and > not have local user accounts. Should I say screw it and go buy something > like Communigate Pro? or tinker with it? I was looking at Critical Path > stuff, but Solaris or Windoze only. > > Enlighten me people :) > > Thanks! > > Henrik > --- > Henrik Hudson > > Microsoft: "Where would you like to go to today" > Linux: "Where would you like to go tomorrow" > FreeBSD: "Hey, when are you guys going to catch up" > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Feb 15 11:15:52 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mail.numachi.com (numachi.numachi.com [198.175.254.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AF04237B4EC for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 11:15:43 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 1088 invoked by uid 3001); 15 Feb 2001 19:15:41 -0000 Received: from natto.numachi.com (198.175.254.216) by numachi.numachi.com with SMTP; 15 Feb 2001 19:15:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 47441 invoked by uid 1001); 15 Feb 2001 19:15:41 -0000 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:15:41 -0500 From: Brian Reichert To: Udo Erdelhoff Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: detecting uncontrolled reboot? Message-ID: <20010215141541.P91352@numachi.com> References: <20010215121715.J91352@numachi.com> <20010215193442.C97705@nathan.ruhr.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20010215193442.C97705@nathan.ruhr.de>; from ue@nathan.ruhr.de on Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 07:34:42PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 07:34:42PM +0100, Udo Erdelhoff wrote: > Please not that this isn't 100% proof. For a better solution, you should > convert the flag file into an entry in your database. After all, you don't > care if the system crashes, you only care if the system crashes while > your database is running. I do realize that how to handle a messy shutdown can vary on a service-by-service basis. I was hoping to tap into that part of the boot process that tries to mount the filesystema. I'm going to poke at patching 'rc'. I _think_ that if $1 is 'autoboot', then it's beginning the disk checks. It'd be cool if there was a 'dirty boot' kernel variable I could set... > /s/Udo > -- > Enjoy the beauty and power of root -- Brian 'you Bastard' Reichert 37 Crystal Ave. #303 Daytime number: (603) 434-6842 Derry NH 03038-1713 USA Intel architecture: the left-hand path To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Feb 15 11:49:35 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from Samizdat.uucom.com (samizdat.uucom.com [198.202.217.54]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A5B37B401 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 11:49:31 -0800 (PST) Received: (from cshenton@localhost) by Samizdat.uucom.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA11005; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:49:28 -0500 (EST) To: "Hudson, Henrik H." Cc: "'freebsd-isp@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: Mail Server with LDAP? References: From: Chris Shenton Date: 15 Feb 2001 14:49:28 -0500 In-Reply-To: "Hudson, Henrik H."'s message of "Thu, 15 Feb 2001 10:30:21 -0600" Message-ID: Lines: 37 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 15 Feb 2001 10:30:21 -0600, "Hudson, Henrik H." said: Hudson> I want to get a mail server running that will do user auth via Hudson> a LDAP server which will allow me get around the problem of Hudson> A)Creating local user accounts and B) having the user at one Hudson> domain not be able to have the same name as a user at another Hudson> domain. or would a MySQL server work better? safer? easier? Hudson> The POP server to handle this? QPopper works via a PAM module Hudson> and LDAP, I think? What else? Hudson> Need an IMAP server too. I set up something like this recently, not using LDAP, but with a suite of packages based on qmail. Works well and you can build it all from the ports collection. No user accounts on the system, except the one under which the MTA runs, and the one under which the virtual mail manager runs. qmail mta vpopmail modifies qmail for virtual domains qmailadmin web interface to manage domains sqwebmail web-based mua Check www.inter7.com. They talk about which POP and IMAP servers you can use. It's rather surprising how quick this was to get up and running. Instead of using a central LDAP directory, the account info is kept in CDB (DJB's constant-time platform-neutral gdb-like database). If I was gonna build something huge, with lots of separate machines for POP/IMAP, SMTP, etc, I'd have to go with a central directory -- LDAP. But for a single machine handling a few thousand users this is more than enough. vpopmail apparently can do LDAP stuff but I haven't looked into it yet. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Feb 15 12:46:41 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from black.purplecat.net (ns1.purplecat.net [209.16.228.148]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3053337B491 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 12:46:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (peter@localhost) by black.purplecat.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA16311 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 15:48:57 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from peter@black.purplecat.net) Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 15:48:57 -0500 (EST) From: Peter Brezny To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: annoying denied dns updates from lame nt/2000 servers Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I've inherrited some nt/2000 machines on this network at the office that are trying to push updates (i think) to the freebsd 4.2 stable dns machine that is the soa for the domain. Does anyone know how i can convince those machines to stop.?. Feb 15 14:36:45 virtual2 named[177]: denied update from [209.16.228.153].25222 for "228.16.209. in-addr.arpa" TIA pb To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Feb 15 12:56:12 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from slip-3.slip.net (slip-3.slip.net [207.171.193.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC58C37B65D for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 12:56:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from cshishid by slip-3.slip.net with local (Exim 2.02 #1) id 14TVRX-0003DB-00; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 12:55:59 -0800 Subject: Re: annoying denied dns updates from lame nt/2000 servers To: peter@black.purplecat.net (Peter Brezny) Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 12:55:58 -0800 (PST) Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: from "Peter Brezny" at Feb 15, 2001 03:48:57 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL2] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: From: Clark Shishido Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > > I've inherrited some nt/2000 machines on this network at the office that > are trying to push updates (i think) to the freebsd 4.2 stable dns machine > that is the soa for the domain. > > Does anyone know how i can convince those machines to stop.?. > it's the lovely magic of DDNS which is part of ActiveDirectory. default Windows2000 Server installation turns it on by default. you're going to have to learn some Windows2000. --clark To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Feb 15 12:56:48 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mgw1.MEIway.com (mgw1.meiway.com [212.73.210.75]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7D6037B491 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 12:56:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from sv.Go2France.com (sv.meiway.com [212.73.210.79]) by mgw1.MEIway.com (Postfix Relay Hub) with ESMTP id A7B7A6A906 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 21:56:45 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.0.20010215215303.04b5ceb0@mail.Go2France.com> X-Sender: lconrad%Go2France.com@mail.Go2France.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0 Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 21:54:49 +0100 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org From: Len Conrad Subject: Re: annoying denied dns updates from lame nt/2000 servers In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >I've inherrited some nt/2000 machines on this network at the office that >are trying to push updates (i think) to the freebsd 4.2 stable dns machine >that is the soa for the domain. > >Does anyone know how i can convince those machines to stop.?. yes, this is a known pb with W2K where default is to do dynamic updates. Sniff around each box's tcp/ip settings and turn off dynamic updates. all will become quiet. Len http://BIND8NT.MEIway.com : Binary for ISC BIND 8.2.3 for NT4 & W2K http://IMGate.MEIway.com : Build free, hi-perf, anti-spam mail gateways To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Feb 15 12:57:35 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from tigerdyr.lyngbol.dk (tigerdyr.lyngbol.dk [193.162.142.120]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D26C937B401 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 12:57:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by tigerdyr.lyngbol.dk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id BB7329889; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 21:57:29 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 21:57:29 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Michael_Lyngb=F8l?= To: Peter Brezny Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: annoying denied dns updates from lame nt/2000 servers Message-ID: <20010215215729.A25714@tigerdyr.lyngbol.dk> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from peter@black.purplecat.net on Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 03:48:57PM -0500 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/i386 4.2-STABLE X-snotskovl: http://totalportal.snotskovl.dk Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 03:48:57PM -0500, Peter Brezny wrote: > I've inherrited some nt/2000 machines on this network at the office that > are trying to push updates (i think) to the freebsd 4.2 stable dns machine > that is the soa for the domain. > > Does anyone know how i can convince those machines to stop.?. http://www.mejlgade50.dk/dns/ Sorry about the danish stuff, but you'll have to uncheck 'Register this connection's adresses in DNS' /Michael To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Feb 15 14:31:10 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from fep02-svc.swip.net (fep02.swip.net [130.244.199.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F214337B491 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:31:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from henrik.localdomain ([212.151.239.124]) by fep02-svc.swip.net (InterMail vM.5.01.01.01 201-252-104) with ESMTP id <20010215223051.CPCU9129.fep02-svc.swip.net@henrik.localdomain>; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 23:30:51 +0100 Received: from henrik.localdomain (IDENT:henrik@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by henrik.localdomain (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id XAA00438; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 23:15:35 +0100 Message-ID: <3A8C5507.14D6FA15@hem.passagen.se> Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 23:15:35 +0100 From: Henrik Nordstrom X-Mailer: Mozilla 3.01 (X11; I; Linux 2.2.14-5.0 i586) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Wilson Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List , squid-users@ircache.net Subject: Re: [SQU] Bind pinging ? References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Have you compiled your Squid with --enable-icmp? Are you sure this is ICMP ECHO packets, and not any of the normal ICMP types needed for proper TCP/IP operation and part of normal TCP/IP use? (not sure how to read that packet log entry to find the interesting pieces to tell what kind of ICMP packet it was..) -- Henrik Nordstrom Squid hacker David Wilson wrote: > > Hi guys, > > A quick question, why do our bind 8 DNS ping servers continously try and > ping our clients and visa versa ? > > #Sample# > Feb 15 12:26:30 firewall kernel: Packet log: output DENY ppp0 PROTO=1 > 10.0.0.1:3 10.0.0.2:3 L=404 S=0xC0 I=44615 > F=0x0000 T=255 (#16) > #/Sample# > > I know that Squid seems to do this too sometimes ? > Is there a way to disable this, because my firewall logs get kinda large ! > ;-) > Any help would be appreciated, thanks. > > Kindest regards > David Wilson > The S.A Internet > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > Name: winmail.dat > Part 1.2 Type: application/ms-tnef > Encoding: base64 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Feb 15 14:43:20 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mail.class.com (mail.class.com [207.91.36.227]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 997C637B65D for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:43:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from cab.elwood.net (lnk2-ogorman-1.binary.net [216.229.6.242]) by mail.class.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42FAD59206; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 16:43:08 -0600 (CST) Received: by cab.elwood.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 89F53994D3; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 16:43:05 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 16:43:05 -0600 From: Jim To: "Hudson, Henrik H." Cc: "'freebsd-isp@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: Mail Server with LDAP? Message-ID: <20010215164305.C28567@elwood.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.4i In-Reply-To: ; from hhudson@eschelon.com on Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 10:30:21AM -0600 X-Whaa: You read headers? Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Check out: http://www.deadly.org/article.php3?sid=20000202022617&mode=flat On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 10:30:21AM -0600, Hudson, Henrik H. wrote: > Hello List- > > So, I want to get a mail server running that will do user auth via a LDAP > server which will allow me get around the problem of A)Creating local user > accounts and B) having the user at one domain not be able to have the same > name as a user at another domain. or would a MySQL server work better? > safer? easier? > > The POP server to handle this? QPopper works via a PAM module and LDAP, I > think? What else? > > Then we need a SMTP server to handle deliveries. Will sendmail do this? > NOTE: Please don't get into a security argument on this one :) > > Need an IMAP server too. > > Point me to a website with docs, etc... and I will be happy to read it :) I > was paging through the openldap.org site. Looks promising... > > The ultimate goal is to do the above, have a webmail interface to it all and > not have local user accounts. Should I say screw it and go buy something > like Communigate Pro? or tinker with it? I was looking at Critical Path > stuff, but Solaris or Windoze only. > > Enlighten me people :) > > Thanks! > > Henrik > --- > Henrik Hudson > > Microsoft: "Where would you like to go to today" > Linux: "Where would you like to go tomorrow" > FreeBSD: "Hey, when are you guys going to catch up" > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message -- Jim O'Gorman jameso@elwood.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Feb 15 14:48:20 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from corey.datafast.net.au (corey.datafast.net.au [203.123.67.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D434937B503 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 14:48:16 -0800 (PST) Received: (qmail 57045 invoked by uid 1000); 15 Feb 2001 22:48:29 -0000 From: "Corey Ralph" Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 09:48:29 +1100 To: "Hudson, Henrik H." Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mail Server with LDAP? Message-ID: <20010216094829.B28246@corey.datafast.net.au> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from hhudson@eschelon.com on Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 10:30:21AM -0600 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi. We are running a qmail based system with vmailmgr, for about 20k mailboxes at about 300 domains. I am very happy with it, it is rock solid and fast. It doesn't exactly fit your description, but may be worth a look anyway. On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 10:30:21AM -0600, Hudson, Henrik H. wrote: > Hello List- > > So, I want to get a mail server running that will do user auth via a LDAP > server which will allow me get around the problem of A)Creating local user > accounts and B) having the user at one domain not be able to have the same > name as a user at another domain. or would a MySQL server work better? > safer? easier? vmailmgr works by one system user controlling each domain, and individual password databases in each. The users can log in with their full email address or as domainuser-mailbox. It also supports ip based virtual domains, so they can log in with just the mailbox name. > The POP server to handle this? QPopper works via a PAM module and LDAP, I > think? What else? qmail-pop3d. It has an external program called checkpassword which you can replace to give different functionality. vmailmgr comes with its own. > Then we need a SMTP server to handle deliveries. Will sendmail do this? > NOTE: Please don't get into a security argument on this one :) qmail-smtpd. > Need an IMAP server too. Courier IMAP > Point me to a website with docs, etc... and I will be happy to read it :) I > was paging through the openldap.org site. Looks promising... www.qmail.org www.vmailmgr.org > The ultimate goal is to do the above, have a webmail interface to it all and We use squirrelmail, it rocks. It is written in php so it is fairly easy to make modifications. www.squirrelmail.org > not have local user accounts. Should I say screw it and go buy something > like Communigate Pro? or tinker with it? I was looking at Critical Path > stuff, but Solaris or Windoze only. > > Enlighten me people :) > > Thanks! > > Henrik > --- > Henrik Hudson > > Microsoft: "Where would you like to go to today" > Linux: "Where would you like to go tomorrow" > FreeBSD: "Hey, when are you guys going to catch up" > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Feb 15 19:10:10 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from hotmail.com (f302.law14.hotmail.com [64.4.20.177]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3687C37B491 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 19:10:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 19:10:08 -0800 Received: from 161.184.39.163 by lw14fd.law14.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 03:10:03 GMT X-Originating-IP: [161.184.39.163] From: "Jeffrey Sewell" To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: ftpd[1052]: /etc/pwd.db: No such file or directory Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 03:10:03 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Feb 2001 03:10:08.0019 (UTC) FILETIME=[F753CE30:01C097C5] Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Feb 15 12:02:15 raven ftpd[1052]: /etc/pwd.db: No such file or directory Yet I have; [root@raven] /etc#ls -la /etc/*pwd* -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 40960 Jan 30 07:36 /etc/pwd.db -rw------- 1 root wheel 40960 Jan 30 07:36 /etc/spwd.db I have only started seeing this as I added.. *.* /var/log/all.log in /etc/syslog.conf Thanks for the help :) I should be noted that I've been having issues with MYKERNEL successfully booting in the last 3 days. I have tried GENERIC and it won't boot either. It says 'Fatal trap 12 while in kernel mode'. Thanks again, Jeff. _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Feb 15 22:36:43 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from ns.internet.dk (ns.internet.dk [194.19.140.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C9237B503 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 22:36:40 -0800 (PST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by ns.internet.dk (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f1G6aYU59027 for freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG.AVP; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 07:36:34 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from leifn@neland.dk) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by ns.internet.dk (8.11.2/8.11.2) with UUCP id f1G6aSi59012; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 07:36:28 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from leifn@neland.dk) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arnold.neland.dk (8.11.1/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f1G6aEx11462; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 07:36:19 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from leifn@neland.dk) Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 07:36:13 +0100 (CET) From: Leif Neland To: Peter Brezny Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: annoying denied dns updates from lame nt/2000 servers In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Peter Brezny wrote: > I've inherrited some nt/2000 machines on this network at the office that > are trying to push updates (i think) to the freebsd 4.2 stable dns machine > that is the soa for the domain. > > Does anyone know how i can convince those machines to stop.?. > > Feb 15 14:36:45 virtual2 named[177]: denied update from > [209.16.228.153].25222 for "228.16.209. > in-addr.arpa" > I presume the dns is private, i.e. not visible to the world. You could also try allowing the updates. Perhaps the wintendoes could use this information? Just keep the original zonefiles backed up in case the ddns breaks something. Leif To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Feb 15 22:53:29 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from ns.internet.dk (ns.internet.dk [194.19.140.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 359CB37B491 for ; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 22:53:26 -0800 (PST) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by ns.internet.dk (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f1G6rOj89276 for freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG.AVP; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 07:53:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from leifn@neland.dk) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by ns.internet.dk (8.11.2/8.11.2) with UUCP id f1G6rOC89217; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 07:53:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from leifn@neland.dk) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arnold.neland.dk (8.11.1/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f1G6rDx11560; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 07:53:13 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from leifn@neland.dk) Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 07:53:13 +0100 (CET) From: Leif Neland To: Brian Reichert Cc: Udo Erdelhoff , freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: detecting uncontrolled reboot? In-Reply-To: <20010215141541.P91352@numachi.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, 15 Feb 2001, Brian Reichert wrote: > On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 07:34:42PM +0100, Udo Erdelhoff wrote: > > Please not that this isn't 100% proof. For a better solution, you should > > convert the flag file into an entry in your database. After all, you don't > > care if the system crashes, you only care if the system crashes while > > your database is running. > > I do realize that how to handle a messy shutdown can vary on a > service-by-service basis. I was hoping to tap into that part of > the boot process that tries to mount the filesystema. > > I'm going to poke at patching 'rc'. I _think_ that if $1 is > 'autoboot', then it's beginning the disk checks. It'd be cool if > there was a 'dirty boot' kernel variable I could set... > Wouldn't just checking for a /var/db/mysql/${uname}.pid do? I think the pid-file is removed at a clean database shutdown. Leif To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Feb 16 0: 3: 6 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from nbux.com (ASte-Genev-Bois-101-1-2-99.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.252.179.99]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 279FE37B491 for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 00:03:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from goliath ([192.168.5.20]) by nbux.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f1G831a12093 for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 09:03:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@nbux.com) Message-ID: <004901c097ef$027cdfd0$1405a8c0@goliath> From: "lifo" To: Subject: bind + denied update Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 09:03:51 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I all i have just installed a dns server (freebsd-4.2) in my school to replace a bind 4.x under WinNT. And i have, all the time a repeated error message : denied update from ...... What does it mean please ? And how could i stop it ? Thanks in advance... -- NoThiNg BuT UniX -=- www.nbux.com -=- Powered by FreeBSD ! lifo@nbux.com -- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Feb 16 0:29: 8 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from spooky.eis.net.au (spooky.eis.net.au [203.12.171.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B8E837B67D for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 00:29:03 -0800 (PST) Received: (from ernie@localhost) by spooky.eis.net.au (8.11.2/8.9.3) id f1G8Sxd44438 for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 18:28:59 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from ernie) From: Ernie Elu Message-Id: <200102160828.f1G8Sxd44438@spooky.eis.net.au> Subject: flow-tools port To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 18:28:58 +1000 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL40 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Has anyone used the flow-tools port to capture Netflow data from a Cisco router? I can get flow-capture to do anything, it just quits out. I tried the example: flow-capture -z6 -E1G -c2 -w/var/flowdata after making sure I created the /var/flowdata dir but still nothing. The program flow-receive seems to work, but I presume flow-capture is the heart of the thing. Any clues? - Ernie. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Feb 16 2:21:21 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from axis.tdd.lt (axis.tdd.lt [193.219.211.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEDCD37B65D for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 02:21:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (midom@localhost) by axis.tdd.lt (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f1GAL8n34332; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 12:21:08 +0200 (EET) Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 12:21:07 +0200 (EET) From: Domas Mituzas X-Sender: midom@axis.tdd.lt To: Ernie Elu Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: flow-tools port In-Reply-To: <200102160828.f1G8Sxd44438@spooky.eis.net.au> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > flow-capture -z6 -E1G -c2 -w/var/flowdata flow-capture -z9 -c2 -e48 -n23 -p15442 -w /opt/flowdata and it works fine. check if your process is running, also, syslog entries. As you can see in my working example, I specified the port, to which cisco is sending me it's messages (make sure, to which does yours and specify also, it may help). > The program flow-receive seems to work, but I presume flow-capture is the > heart of the thing. Both are working for me, both should work for you. Cheers, Domas To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Feb 16 3:39:55 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from hitline.ch (mail.hitline.ch [195.129.74.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62FDD37B401 for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 03:39:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from [195.129.74.2] (account micheal@com4u.ch HELO [10.10.14.46]) by hitline.ch (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4b8) with ESMTP id 3586040 for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 09:39:51 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Sender: micheal%com4u.ch@mail.com4u.ch Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20010215164305.C28567@elwood.net> References: <20010215164305.C28567@elwood.net> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 09:39:48 +0100 To: "'freebsd-isp@freebsd.org'" From: Michael O Shea Subject: Re: Mail Server with LDAP? Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" ; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi folks. I am starting to see these kernel messages on a busy postgres/FreeBSD box. =46eb 15 23:29:20 pgsql2 /kernel: pmap_collect: collecting pv entries -- suggest increasing PMAP_SHPGPERPROC Lint says about this, # # Set the number of PV entries per process. Increasing this can # stop panics related to heavy use of shared memory. However, that can # (combined with large amounts of physical memory) cause panics at # boot time due the kernel running out of VM space. # # If you're tweaking this, you might also want to increase the sysctls # "vm.v_free_min", "vm.v_free_reserved", and "vm.v_free_target". # # The value below is the one more than the default. # options PMAP_SHPGPERPROC=3D201 What would be a good value for this on a busy postgres box ,dual xeon/2G RAM /100-180 postgres daemons ? -- Micheal O Shea ----------------------------------------------------- com-o-tronic ag Micheal O Shea, Systems Engineer Gewerbepark CH-5506 M=E4genwil E-Mail micheal@com4u.ch Voice: +41 62 887 3734 =46ax: +41 62 896 1133 Internet: http://www.com4u.ch http://www.ehitline.ch To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Feb 16 4: 5: 0 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from harp.wrdp.com (harp.dublin.wrdp.net [212.147.130.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4DC437B401 for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 04:04:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from JRAFTERY (jraftery.dublin.wrdp.net [172.16.4.52]) by harp.wrdp.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 6489710AC3 for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 12:04:49 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <00b201c09811$08228580$340410ac@JRAFTERY> From: "James Raftery" To: References: <004901c097ef$027cdfd0$1405a8c0@goliath> Subject: Re: bind + denied update Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 12:07:28 -0000 Organization: Worldport Communications Inc MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org ----- Original Message ----- From: "lifo" To: Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 8:03 AM Subject: bind + denied update > And i have, all the time a repeated error message : denied update from > What does it mean please ? It means you haven't searched the archives :) This has come up many, many times as there's is a thread "annoying denied dns updates from lame nt/2000 servers" happening right now! It's caused by Windows2000 machines which attempt to use Dynamic DNS Updates. > And how could i stop it ? http://www.domainregistry.ie/tech/dynamic-dns.html Regards, james To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Feb 16 6: 7: 0 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from www.golsyd.net.au (ftp.golsyd.net.au [203.57.20.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5DF537B65D for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 06:06:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from [203.164.12.28] by www.quake.com.au (NTMail 4.30.0012/AB6169.63.5724aadf) with ESMTP id mfgaaaaa for ; Sat, 17 Feb 2001 01:06:16 +1100 Message-ID: <3A8D3449.E52B18EA@quake.com.au> Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 01:08:09 +1100 From: Kal Torak X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: FreeBSD-isp Subject: Re: FreeBSD /w NT domain References: <3A8A2EC1.4DBF543B@quake.com.au> <20010214093033.A16676@yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Thanks for your help and information everyone, It looks like Samba is THE only way to make FreeBSD do the job of a PDC, unfortunately its latest stable version has almost none of the needed features, and its latest current is still lacking in some areas... Version 3 looks promising though, with the TNG version being merged in with the base... It should be something to look forward to, and everyone can get rid of there NT/2K DC's :) Thanks again! Kal. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Feb 16 6:25:50 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mgw1.MEIway.com (mgw1.meiway.com [212.73.210.75]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95B5437B4EC for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 06:25:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from sv.Go2France.com (sv.meiway.com [212.73.210.79]) by mgw1.MEIway.com (Postfix Relay Hub) with ESMTP id B1C346A910 for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 15:25:43 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <5.0.0.25.0.20010216151706.0594bd00@mail.Go2France.com> X-Sender: lconrad%Go2France.com@mail.Go2France.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0 Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 15:23:40 +0100 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org From: Len Conrad Subject: Re: FreeBSD /w NT domain In-Reply-To: <3A8D3449.E52B18EA@quake.com.au> References: <3A8A2EC1.4DBF543B@quake.com.au> <20010214093033.A16676@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >the TNG version being merged in with the base... It should be >something to look forward to, and everyone can get rid of there >NT/2K DC's :) But the line from MS is that DC (NT4) is dead, DNS/AD (W2K) is the future, as fast you can pay for it. Many corps are migrating now/soon/later, as they are mostly prisoners of the only game in town. "innovative" AD is the Novell directory killer, 10 years after Novell truly innovated with their global directory service. Len http://BIND8NT.MEIway.com : Binary for ISC BIND 8.2.3 for NT4 & W2K http://IMGate.MEIway.com : Build free, hi-perf, anti-spam mail gateways To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Feb 16 6:57:40 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from www.golsyd.net.au (ftp.golsyd.net.au [203.57.20.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E70937B4EC for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 06:57:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from [203.164.12.28] by www.quake.com.au (NTMail 4.30.0012/AB6169.63.5724aadf) with ESMTP id ufgaaaaa for ; Sat, 17 Feb 2001 01:57:00 +1100 Message-ID: <3A8D402E.AD1C2890@quake.com.au> Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 01:58:54 +1100 From: Kal Torak X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win98; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD /w NT domain References: <3A8A2EC1.4DBF543B@quake.com.au> <20010214093033.A16676@yahoo.com> <5.0.0.25.0.20010216151706.0594bd00@mail.Go2France.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Len Conrad wrote: > > >the TNG version being merged in with the base... It should be > >something to look forward to, and everyone can get rid of there > >NT/2K DC's :) > > But the line from MS is that DC (NT4) is dead, DNS/AD (W2K) is the > future, as fast you can pay for it. Many corps are migrating > now/soon/later, as they are mostly prisoners of the only game in town. They are fairly much the same thing, except now MS want to make there own DNS instead of netBIOS they always used before... They will probably change the /'s used in DNS with \'s :P AD is what I call "putting all your eggs in one basket" and from MS's history its probably a very insecure basket that things fall out of... But regardless of all that NT4 is going to take a long time to die out I would think, which means even if they all migrate to 2k servers, they will all have to run in compatibility mode anyway, which means the Samba people will have plenty of time to make it able to replace 2k's AD, and everyone can still get rid of those horrible things :) It would be a very hard battle to kill off all those MS workstations out there (hell im using one now) but if we can offer all the features of these MS servers (what ever they are supposed to be) on top of everything else I see no reason why anyone should pay insane sums of money for that pile of crap when we offer a far better solution for nothing! Well thats how I feel after being forced to use w2k for a whole day, and hearing people say the word "NT" every second sentence... The sooner I get FreeBSD doing the job the better... For my sanitys sake :) Eeeak, that was a long post... Looks like it could be time to take this thread the the freebsd-NThaters list :P Kal. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Feb 16 7:19:36 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from sai.co.za (mail.sai.co.za [196.33.40.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39EA137B503 for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 07:19:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from dave ([196.33.40.17]) by mail.sai.co.za (SBMail MTA v2.11(1142) SMTPD32) with ESMTP id AA9376; for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 17:18:13 0200 (South Africa Standard Time) From: "David Wilson" To: "FreeBSD Mailing List" Subject: ODBC connectors for POP3 daemons ?? Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 17:19:34 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0055_01C0983C.A1896650" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0055_01C0983C.A1896650 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi guys, howzit going ? Is there anyway to add Microsoft SQL ODBC support any POP3 daemons for user POP3 logons ? Even if I can't get a decent ODBC for Microsoft SQL, can I use MySQL or the likes ? Thanks, I desparetly need this info so any guidance would be most welcome. Kindest regards David Wilson The S.A Internet ------=_NextPart_000_0055_01C0983C.A1896650 Content-Type: application/ms-tnef; name="winmail.dat" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="winmail.dat" eJ8+IiIPAQaQCAAEAAAAAAABAAEAAQeQBgAIAAAA5AQAAAAAAADoAAEIgAcAGAAAAElQTS5NaWNy b3NvZnQgTWFpbC5Ob3RlADEIAQ2ABAACAAAAAgACAAEGgAMADgAAANEHAgAQABEAEwAAAAUAEwEB A5AGAIQGAAAlAAAACwACAAEAAAALACMAAAAAAAMAJgAAAAAACwApAAAAAAADADYAAAAAAB4AcAAB AAAAJAAAAE9EQkMgY29ubmVjdG9ycyBmb3IgUE9QMyBkYWVtb25zID8/AAIBcQABAAAAFgAAAAHA mCvdzoUgfYmqW06Xk0HpayYa7rcAAAIBHQwBAAAAFQAAAFNNVFA6REFWRVdAU0FJLkNPLlpBAAAA AAsAAQ4AAAAAQAAGDgCKnskrmMABAgEKDgEAAAAYAAAAAAAAAGp7v088PNQRlYgAEEtXrBfCgAAA CwAfDgEAAAACAQkQAQAAABcCAAATAgAAvgIAAExaRnX1zWEdAwAKAHJjcGcxMjUWMgD4C2BuDhAw MzNPAfcCpAPjAgBjaArAc/BldDAgBxMCgwBQEGbYcHJxDlAQ330KgAjI9CA7CWI1AFAJwxVBCjIY MTUzAoAUInN0ecpsB5BoCeB0ewewBbAjAMACc3MxIBcgYWSRC4BnIDET81x2CJCkd2sLgGQ0DGBj AFADCwMLtSBIaSBndQh5cywYQG93emnpBUBnbxiSPwqiCoQKgFpJBCB0FyAJcCAAcHkod2F5HUBv HaBkZGcF0A3gA2BzbwGABgBRAEwgT0RCQyBzGHVwcAkRHaIgUE/AUDMgZGFlBGAGMfsCEAXAdREg BcAggwkAG/BTBjEcVUV2CfAgBpAg6EkgYwBwJxvRETAdoP8gwAWQCfAFQB9zIVIemxtg7yOxI4Eh kQXQeR8yBbEdUVkiIGlrB5EcVVQQ8G5uaxtRI5ABAHMKsREwbH0eAG4J4B5wHVAEACNQbl8CEB+w HjEgURsgaSDQbqkkkCB3CGBsHnBiHZBnBGAWwCvQZWwFoAeALtscagr0bhuQK3BjKbAKsXkR8SBL GZEHkAVACXBnZwsRELAcc0RhGUAecFefAxAe4AuQLbkn8GVwC5C/LmoYIAjQAEEsAAogICig8R2Q Uy5BI4ACMASRETD/La8utTNwAUAsAC5gKfAKIF8BQDUZATEccxQRADjQAAsAAYAIIAYAAAAAAMAA AAAAAABGAAAAAAOFAAAAAAAAAwADgAggBgAAAAAAwAAAAAAAAEYAAAAAEIUAAAAAAAADAAeACCAG AAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAABShQAAJ2oBAB4ACYAIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAAFSFAAABAAAA BAAAADkuMAAeAAqACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAAA2hQAAAQAAAAEAAAAAAAAAHgALgAggBgAA AAAAwAAAAAAAAEYAAAAAN4UAAAEAAAABAAAAAAAAAB4ADIAIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAADiF AAABAAAAAQAAAAAAAAALAA2ACCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAACChQAAAQAAAAMAHYAIIAYAAAAA AMAAAAAAAABGAAAAAAGFAAAAAAAACwBXgAggBgAAAAAAwAAAAAAAAEYAAAAADoUAAAAAAAADAFmA CCAGAAAAAADAAAAAAAAARgAAAAARhQAAAAAAAAMAWoAIIAYAAAAAAMAAAAAAAABGAAAAABiFAAAA AAAACwCVgAggBgAAAAAAwAAAAAAAAEYAAAAABoUAAAAAAAACAfgPAQAAABAAAABqe79PPDzUEZWI ABBLV6wXAgH6DwEAAAAQAAAAanu/Tzw81BGViAAQS1esFwIB+w8BAAAAlwAAAAAAAAA4obsQBeUQ GqG7CAArKlbCAABQU1RQUlguRExMAAAAAAAAAABOSVRB+b+4AQCqADfZbgAAAEM6XERvY3VtZW50 cyBhbmQgU2V0dGluZ3NcZGF2ZXdcTG9jYWwgU2V0dGluZ3NcQXBwbGljYXRpb24gRGF0YVxNaWNy b3NvZnRcT3V0bG9va1xvdXRsb29rLnBzdAAAAwD+DwUAAAADAA00/TcAAAIBfwABAAAALwAAADxO RUJCSkZJSUdLR0xQRUJJSkFDTElFSEZEQkFBLmRhdmV3QHNhaS5jby56YT4AAAMABhCdkVP7AwAH EP8AAAADABAQAAAAAAMAERAAAAAAHgAIEAEAAABlAAAASElHVVlTLEhPV1pJVEdPSU5HP0lTVEhF UkVBTllXQVlUT0FERE1JQ1JPU09GVFNRTE9EQkNTVVBQT1JUQU5ZUE9QM0RBRU1PTlNGT1JVU0VS UE9QM0xPR09OUz9FVkVOSUZJQwAAAACRZA== ------=_NextPart_000_0055_01C0983C.A1896650-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Feb 16 8:16:46 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from sai.co.za (mail.sai.co.za [196.33.40.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6F8B37B491 for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:16:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from dave ([196.33.40.17]) by mail.sai.co.za (SBMail MTA v2.11(1142) SMTPD32) with ESMTP id AA9376; for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 18:15:23 0200 (South Africa Standard Time) From: "David Wilson" To: "Paul Khavkine" Cc: "FreeBSD Mailing List" Subject: RE: ODBC connectors for POP3 daemons ?? Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 18:16:43 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 In-Reply-To: <3A8D0488.E94614C6@colba.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi Paul, Thanks for getting back to me ! Much appreciated. Is there anyway once we have that all working to link the Mysql tables to Microsoft SQL tables through some type of ODBC connector ? -----Original Message----- From: paul@caturix.genilog.net [mailto:paul@caturix.genilog.net]On Behalf Of Paul Khavkine Sent: 16 February 2001 12:44 To: David Wilson Subject: Re: ODBC connectors for POP3 daemons ?? Check out the following: http://http://www.riverstyx.net/qpopmysql http://www.posixnet.org Cheers Paul David Wilson wrote: > Hi guys, howzit going ? > > Is there anyway to add Microsoft SQL ODBC support any POP3 daemons for user > POP3 logons ? > Even if I can't get a decent ODBC for Microsoft SQL, can I use MySQL or the > likes ? > Thanks, I desparetly need this info so any guidance would be most welcome. > > Kindest regards > David Wilson > The S.A Internet > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Name: winmail.dat > winmail.dat Type: application/ms-tnef > Encoding: base64 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Feb 16 8:56:40 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from sai.co.za (mail.sai.co.za [196.33.40.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE34C37B4EC for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 08:56:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from dave ([196.33.40.17]) by mail.sai.co.za (SBMail MTA v2.11(1142) SMTPD32) with ESMTP id AA9376; for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 18:55:09 0200 (South Africa Standard Time) From: "David Wilson" To: "Paul Khavkine" Cc: "FreeBSD Mailing List" Subject: RE: ODBC connectors for POP3 daemons ?? Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 18:56:24 +0200 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 In-Reply-To: <3A8D0F5F.8C0AC941@colba.net> Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Marvelous ! Thanks. ;-) -----Original Message----- From: paul@caturix.genilog.net [mailto:paul@caturix.genilog.net]On Behalf Of Paul Khavkine Sent: 16 February 2001 01:31 To: David Wilson Subject: Re: ODBC connectors for POP3 daemons ?? Yes. Take a look at ODBC-ODBC bridge at http://www.easysoft.com It works, in my experience it's not too reliable but it works. Cheers Paul David Wilson wrote: > Hi Paul, > > Thanks for getting back to me ! > Much appreciated. > Is there anyway once we have that all working to link the Mysql tables to > Microsoft SQL tables through some type of ODBC connector ? > > -----Original Message----- > From: paul@caturix.genilog.net [mailto:paul@caturix.genilog.net]On > Behalf Of Paul Khavkine > Sent: 16 February 2001 12:44 > To: David Wilson > Subject: Re: ODBC connectors for POP3 daemons ?? > > Check out the following: > > http://http://www.riverstyx.net/qpopmysql > http://www.posixnet.org > > Cheers > Paul > > David Wilson wrote: > > > Hi guys, howzit going ? > > > > Is there anyway to add Microsoft SQL ODBC support any POP3 daemons for > user > > POP3 logons ? > > Even if I can't get a decent ODBC for Microsoft SQL, can I use MySQL or > the > > likes ? > > Thanks, I desparetly need this info so any guidance would be most welcome. > > > > Kindest regards > > David Wilson > > The S.A Internet > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Name: winmail.dat > > winmail.dat Type: application/ms-tnef > > Encoding: base64 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Fri Feb 16 9:34:52 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mout0.freenet.de (mout0.freenet.de [194.97.50.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB0CD37B491 for ; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 09:34:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from [194.97.50.138] (helo=mx0.freenet.de) by mout0.freenet.de with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 14TomN-00084F-00; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 18:34:47 +0100 Received: from a392a.pppool.de ([213.6.57.42] helo=Magelan.Leidinger.net) by mx0.freenet.de with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 14TomM-0006CE-00; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 18:34:47 +0100 Received: from Leidinger.net (netchild@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Magelan.Leidinger.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f1GDXbC02952; Fri, 16 Feb 2001 14:33:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from netchild@Leidinger.net) Message-Id: <200102161333.f1GDXbC02952@Magelan.Leidinger.net> Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2001 14:33:36 +0100 (CET) From: Alexander Leidinger Subject: Re: ftpd[1052]: /etc/pwd.db: No such file or directory To: jefffbsd@hotmail.com Cc: freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 16 Feb, Jeffrey Sewell wrote: > Feb 15 12:02:15 raven ftpd[1052]: /etc/pwd.db: No such file or directory > > Yet I have; > [root@raven] /etc#ls -la /etc/*pwd* > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 40960 Jan 30 07:36 /etc/pwd.db > -rw------- 1 root wheel 40960 Jan 30 07:36 /etc/spwd.db > > I have only started seeing this as I added.. > *.* /var/log/all.log in /etc/syslog.conf > > Thanks for the help :) Do you use the chroot feature of ftpd? Bye, Alexander. -- There's no place like ~ http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint = C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sat Feb 17 6:27:32 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mout0.freenet.de (mout0.freenet.de [194.97.50.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E65F37B65D for ; Sat, 17 Feb 2001 06:27:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from [194.97.50.135] (helo=mx2.freenet.de) by mout0.freenet.de with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 14U8Kb-00060e-00; Sat, 17 Feb 2001 15:27:25 +0100 Received: from b853a.pppool.de ([213.7.133.58] helo=Magelan.Leidinger.net) by mx2.freenet.de with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #1) id 14U8KZ-0006nR-00; Sat, 17 Feb 2001 15:27:24 +0100 Received: from Leidinger.net (netchild@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Magelan.Leidinger.net (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f1HBev325313; Sat, 17 Feb 2001 12:40:58 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from netchild@Leidinger.net) Message-Id: <200102171140.f1HBev325313@Magelan.Leidinger.net> Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 12:40:54 +0100 (CET) From: Alexander Leidinger Subject: Re: ftpd[1052]: /etc/pwd.db: No such file or directory To: jefffbsd@hotmail.com Cc: isp@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by Magelan.Leidinger.net id f1HBev325313 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 16 Feb, Jeffrey Sewell wrote: > Yes I use chroot for about 25 accounts. I think I know where you're go= ing=20 > with this one :) Still would like your opinion. This didn't work with a ftpchroot which uses the @group syntax: ---snip--- #!/bin/sh # quick hack! for i in $(cat /etc/ftpchroot); do dir=3D"$(grep "${i}" /etc/passwd | awk -F : '{print $6}')" if [ ! -f ${dir}/etc/pwd.db ]; then echo "Missing etc/pwd.db for user =BB${i}=AB in =BB${dir}=AB." fi done ---snip--- Bye, Alexander. --=20 Loose bits sink chips. http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net GPG fingerprint =3D C518 BC70 E67F 143F BE91 3365 79E2 9C60 B006 3FE7 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sat Feb 17 7:59:21 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from black.purplecat.net (ns1.purplecat.net [209.16.228.148]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0446137B503 for ; Sat, 17 Feb 2001 07:59:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from 2100 (ci377160-a.ashvil1.nc.home.com [24.15.65.209]) by black.purplecat.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA23503 for ; Sat, 17 Feb 2001 11:01:33 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from pbrezny@purplecat.net) Reply-To: From: "Peter Brezny" To: Subject: configure make install problem with vpopmail. Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 11:00:07 -0500 Message-ID: <000001c098fa$b34a2280$cc01a8c0@highland> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I submitted this to =questions but didn't receive a response. I've tried everything now. deleting the port all together, cvsup to get the latest, even a make world last night. Any Ideas? TIA pb I modified the /Makefile for vpopmail to set the prefix to /home and ran make install without realizing there was already a vpopmail user with a default directory of /usr/local/vpopmail. (it would be nice if the make deinstall removed the vpopmail user)...anyhow. I figure no problem, and remove the user but of course a make deinstall doesn't complete successfully because the Makefile points to /home as the prefix. SO i remove the /usr/local/vpopmail directory manually and attempt to run the install again. and it blows... i've tried even removed the binary for vpopmail... any help is greatly appreciated. configure:1135: checking how to run the C preprocessor configure:1156: cc -E conftest.c >/dev/null 2>conftest.out configure:1215: checking for AIX configure:1509: cc -o conftest -O -pipe -Wall conftest.c 1>&5 configure: In function `main': configure:1482: warning: implicit declaration of function `unlink' (end of "config.log") *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/mail/vpopmail. *** Error code 1 Peter Brezny purplecat.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sat Feb 17 15:38:27 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from black.purplecat.net (ns1.purplecat.net [209.16.228.148]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D34E037B4EC; Sat, 17 Feb 2001 15:38:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from 2100 (ci377160-a.ashvil1.nc.home.com [24.15.65.209]) by black.purplecat.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id SAA24259; Sat, 17 Feb 2001 18:40:41 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from pbrezny@purplecat.net) Reply-To: From: "Peter Brezny" To: Cc: Subject: solved (mostly) vpopmail make install fail, after one 'successful' install more info Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 18:37:43 -0500 Message-ID: <000901c0993a$a1178540$cc01a8c0@highland> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook CWS, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I discovered that the port was having difficulty creating the directories, so i created them on my own, and chowned them to the correct users...but i still don't understand why it was unable to create the files that the port was instructed to make. ideas on this are welcome. Thanks for your consideration (though no one responded)...yet. Peter Brezny purplecat.net -----Original Message----- From: Peter Brezny [mailto:pbrezny@purplecat.net] Sent: Saturday, February 17, 2001 5:45 PM To: 'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org' Subject: vpopmail make install fail, after one 'successful' install more info No one replied to the first post. Since that time, i've even run /usr/src/make world and completely removed the port and binaries, starting from fresh. same results. I've never seen this error before, if someone could point me in the right direction, i'll take it from there. TIA Peter Brezny purplecat.net -----Original Message----- From: Peter Brezny [mailto:pbrezny@purplecat.net] Sent: Friday, February 16, 2001 11:25 PM To: 'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org' Subject: vpopmail make install fail, after one 'successful' install...yikes! I modified the /Makefile for vpopmail to set the prefix to /home and ran make install without realizing there was already a vpopmail user with a default directory of /usr/local/vpopmail. (it would be nice if the make deinstall removed the vpopmail user)...anyhow. I figure no problem, and remove the user but of course a make deinstall doesn't complete successfully because the Makefile points to /home as the prefix. SO i remove the /usr/local/vpopmail directory manually and attempt to run the install again. and it blows... i've tried even removed the binary for vpopmail... any help is greatly appreciated. configure:1135: checking how to run the C preprocessor configure:1156: cc -E conftest.c >/dev/null 2>conftest.out configure:1215: checking for AIX configure:1509: cc -o conftest -O -pipe -Wall conftest.c 1>&5 configure: In function `main': configure:1482: warning: implicit declaration of function `unlink' (end of "config.log") *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/mail/vpopmail. *** Error code 1 Peter Brezny purplecat.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sat Feb 17 18:39:35 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from hotmail.com (f222.law14.hotmail.com [64.4.21.222]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4863737B67D for ; Sat, 17 Feb 2001 18:39:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sat, 17 Feb 2001 18:39:29 -0800 Received: from 161.184.39.167 by lw14fd.law14.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 18 Feb 2001 02:39:29 GMT X-Originating-IP: [161.184.39.167] From: "Jeffrey Sewell" To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Collisions each day Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 02:39:29 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 Feb 2001 02:39:29.0550 (UTC) FILETIME=[045732E0:01C09954] Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Network interface status: Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs Coll fxp0 1500 161.71.25.12/ raven 50174 0 23006 0 14688 Should I be alarmed because of : 50174/23006 sent and received and having 14688 collisions. What would cause this? Bad cable from my box to the hub? I have another box that has no collisions with like 123,000,000 packets sent... Thanks for the help fellas. Jeff. _________________________________________________________________________ Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-isp Sat Feb 17 19:19:14 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from misery.sdf.com (misery.sdf.com [204.244.213.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12A0D37B65D for ; Sat, 17 Feb 2001 19:19:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from tom (helo=localhost) by misery.sdf.com with local-esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1) id 14UJeI-0004w1-00; Sat, 17 Feb 2001 18:32:30 -0800 Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2001 18:32:25 -0800 (PST) From: Tom Samplonius To: Jeffrey Sewell Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Collisions each day In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 18 Feb 2001, Jeffrey Sewell wrote: > Network interface status: > Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Opkts Oerrs > Coll > fxp0 1500 161.71.25.12/ raven 50174 0 23006 0 > 14688 > > Should I be alarmed because of : 50174/23006 sent and received and having > 14688 collisions. It does seem to be rather high. > What would cause this? Bad cable from my box to the hub? Possibly. Most likely a bad hub, or too many hubs in the collision domain. I have a nice hub here that causes 100% collisions if I hook it anywhere in the LAN. > I have another box that has no collisions with like 123,000,000 packets > sent... The only way that is possible is if you are using a switch, not a hub. Or, as I recall some ethernet drivers failed to count collisions properly. > Thanks for the help fellas. > Jeff. > _________________________________________________________________________ > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com. Tom To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message