From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Jan 28  1:35:35 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.kconline.com (kconline.com [216.241.132.2])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 477C837B69D
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 01:35:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from barsoom (barsoom.kconline.com [216.241.133.19])
	by mail.kconline.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f0S9ZGV42338;
	Sun, 28 Jan 2001 04:35:16 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from mikea@kconline.com)
Message-ID: <047e01c0890d$9f42a8e0$1385f1d8@kconline.com>
From: "Mike Atkinson" <mikea@kconline.com>
To: <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>,
	"Dirk Meyer" <dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org>
References: <034601c08827$b8e08d80$1385f1d8@kconline.com> <4.2.2.20010127001841.03015358@marble.sentex.net> <4.2.2.20010127204048.013addb0@marble.sentex.net> <T6vYbJveQt@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org>
Subject: Re: LAME domains, sendmail BIND and FreeBSD- its FreeBSDspecific  it seems (was more strange DNS issues in BINDand STABLE.)- 
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 04:35:16 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

----- Original Message -----
From: "Dirk Meyer" <dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org>
>
> Please tweak the lines in the sendmail port:
> files/site.config.m4 to build without NETINET6 or without TCPWRAPPERS.

Removing the NETINET6 lines from files/site.config.m4 seems to have
corrected the problem.

Thanks for your help!

-----
Mike Atkinson - mikea@kconline.com
KC Online, Inc. - System Administration
-----



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Jan 28  4:34:32 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from www.golsyd.net.au (ftp.golsyd.net.au [203.57.20.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E0A37B698
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 04:34:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [203.164.12.28] by www.quake.com.au (NTMail 4.30.0012/AH9370.63.d1acf55c) with ESMTP id kswsaaaa for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 23:42:43 +1100
Message-ID: <3A7411CF.816DA573@quake.com.au>
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 23:34:23 +1100
From: Kal Torak <kaltorak@quake.com.au>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu
Cc: FreeBSD-stable <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: ipfw forwarding (more info)
References: <3A72CB47.7A5DD83@quake.com.au> <20010127220257.B28504@nevermind.kiev.ua> <3A732BE9.F559820D@quake.com.au> <3A732EFB.E7E743BA@quake.com.au> <20010127170621.M10761@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> > After some more fiddling around, I have noticed that the ipfw rule is
> > hit, but nothing seems to happen... The data just continues on to the
> > local port instead of being forwarded to the remote one...
> 
> Are you sure? Please try,
> 
>   # tcpdump -i <iface> -en port 27015
> 
> On each interface that would be involved.
> 
> > Maybe I am missing something that needs to be loaded for this to work?
> 
> No, forwarding is all in the kernel (or KLD module).
> 
> But I suspect you really don't want to forward packets, but actually
> want to do NAT.

Yeah using the redirect_port option in natd works, but I dont understand
why it doesnt work with ipfw... I thought natd might be stopping, but even
having the fwd rule before the divert to natd rule doesnt change anything..
Dose ipfw fwd even work to remote machines?

It would be better to do this with ipfw, since you can add rules on the fly,
but with natd you need to kill it to change those settings... Would ipf be
better maybe?

Thanks for the info, I have it working, but not how I want it to :P
Kal.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Jan 28  5:24: 7 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from Reineke.Malepartus.DE (reineke.malepartus.de [194.25.4.41])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE1F137B400
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 05:23:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from reineke (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by Reineke.Malepartus.DE (8.11.1/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f0SDNg351532
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 14:23:47 +0100 (MET)
	(envelope-from bm@reineke.malepartus.de)
Message-Id: <200101281323.f0SDNg351532@Reineke.Malepartus.DE>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 with nmh-1.0.4
From: Burkard Meyendriesch <bm@Malepartus.de>
Subject: PCI multiport serial cards with 4.2-STABLE
To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Reply-To: bm@Malepartus.de
X-organization: The home of Reineke Fuchs
X-GPOS: 52.0844N 7.9081E
X-phone: +49 5484 96097
X-pgp-fingerprint: DF 83 04 CD B5 D1 10 43  57 4C AD 9A B1 02 28 17
X-face: "[-;]oI+8gP9>*J%knDN8d%DuhvJS2Lj4L\bRb7gz(pcT?2Zh6_Vam_6csAum3$<&lhAFd^
 jt|!&Ut1C~Vg*E/q}+#cbFg-GU]c.bB8Ad,L'W$'9{^0y'AzM4#hS[C[F-1'|O;Kg3V<ZJKG3g9Fs-
 kuovqp|S7(.wC"D@/O5xcb^PSDJU#jyt`tp^7Trg239:o9bDVm\{6J,`P<>rq5q6dsU*TmJ@}+QPM\
 b[^<zL1qL^&)o'{%T@Q&p)N$OZ:aDa(r2f5?52HuGmO'm>9Rhd,UoMpRpd5k[X=h.Dom*kbT`cNQ
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 14:23:42 +0100
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


Hi folks,

for some legacy RS232 devices I urgently need more serial ports in my
4.2-stable box. So I bought a MOXA C104/PCI four port card but don't
get it to work. I use a MSI K7T Pro motherboard with no ISA slots so
I can't use my old AST 4 port serial card :-(

Can anybody of you give me a hint if it is possible at all to use PCI
multiport serial cards in 4.2-stable and if howto configure the kernel.

Many thanks in advance for any answers or pointers.

Burkard

-- =

* Burkard Meyendriesch             ___                bm@malepartus.de *
* Hauptstrasse 45           ________|________       tel +49 5484 96097 *
* D-49219 Glandorf-Schwege          0           52 05'05"N  07 54'29"E *
* PGP-Fingerprint     BF 3B 41 DE 15 4D C9 48  15 EF A5 86 BF 6D 68 1A *




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Jan 28  6:14:16 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from solfertje.student.utwente.nl (wit401310.student.utwente.nl [130.89.236.150])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0810937B400
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 06:13:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from solfertje.student.utwente.nl (localhost.student.utwente.nl [127.0.0.1])
	by solfertje.student.utwente.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 99CCA1F5D; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 15:13:56 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 15:13:54 +0100 (CET)
From: Alban Hertroys <dalroi@solfertje.student.utwente.nl>
Subject: Re: ftp logins
To: Jason Watkins <jwatkins@firstplan.com>
Cc: Freebsd-Stable <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
In-Reply-To: <JBEOKPCEMKJLMJAKBECCKECPCFAA.jwatkins@firstplan.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Message-Id: <20010128141356.99CCA1F5D@solfertje.student.utwente.nl>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On 22 Jan, Jason Watkins wrote:
> Since rebuilding from 4.1 release to -stable, I've had a curious problem
> with ftp logins. Users which should be allowed to log into ftp will get a
> denial message immedately after entrying the login name, the password prompt
> is never given.

I had a similar problem and it turned out to be related to vim
(sounds ridiculous, right?)

Here's the story (some anecdotal value):

I had replaced all instances of '/usr/local/bin/tcsh' to '/bin/tcsh'
in /etc/shells, and in the master.passwd using vipw.
But I had vim set as my EDITOR, and set vim to save a backup of the
original (extension '.orig').

As it turned out, vipw found a copy of the master.passwd file and
told me this:
'the pw.xxx.orig' file did not change. Do you want to edit it?[y]'.

If you enter 'n', it doesn't update your passwd database, and I had
totally overlooked the messages that said such, as the question didn't
seem important.

This way you end up with a perfectly correct /etc/shells,
/etc/master.passwd and /etc/ftpusers, but users using tcsh can't ftp,
as the passwd_db says otherwise! Even the entries in /etc/pam.conf were
correct.

I have been trying to track this problem for about a week, before
finding out what was wrong.

A couple of nice hints:
- are users with other shells allowed ftp access?
- what do you get if you telnet to the ftp port and try to log in by
hand? (great command: 'HELP')
- if you use vim as your default EDITOR, add this to your autocmds:
	autocmd Bufread /etc/pw.* set patchmode
  This stops making a backup in the current directory (if you use the
  patchmode method; there are other ways to create backups!)



-- 

Alban Hertroys                              http://solfertje.student.utwente.nl
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
                       The world is filled with fools,
                       and I enjoy every one of them.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Jan 28  6:18:43 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.net [194.221.183.20])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1A4E637B402
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 06:18:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 27871 invoked by uid 0); 28 Jan 2001 14:17:19 -0000
Received: from p3ee2160e.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO speedy.gsinet) (62.226.22.14)
  by mail.gmx.net (mail07) with SMTP; 28 Jan 2001 14:17:19 -0000
Received: (from sittig@localhost)
	by speedy.gsinet (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA06377
	for stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 08:23:18 +0100
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 08:23:18 +0100
From: Gerhard Sittig <Gerhard.Sittig@gmx.net>
To: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ipnat vs natd and ipf vs ipfw (fwd)
Message-ID: <20010128082318.U253@speedy.gsinet>
Mail-Followup-To: stable@freebsd.org
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101271919450.35303-100000@espen.oysnet.lan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101271919450.35303-100000@espen.oysnet.lan>; from oys@powertech.no on Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 07:20:16PM -0500
Organization: System Defenestrators Inc.
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 19:20 -0500, Espen Oyslebo wrote:
> 
> Ipfw and ipf to my eye (without glasses that is) seem to do
> pretty much the same thing. The same is true for ipnat and
> natd. Of course there are differences between the two (ritgh?).
> 
> If so: 
> What are they?

This has been hashed over a few hundred times in the lists.  You
might want to visit the archives.

> Currently, I have ipfw and natd doing their job fairly well. Is
> there any point in switching (yeah,yeah, don't fix it if it
> ain't broken).

Exactly!  If it works for you, why would you want to risk it?  If
you feel like something's missing, what is it?  Then check if ipf
could do it for you.


virtually yours   82D1 9B9C 01DC 4FB4 D7B4  61BE 3F49 4F77 72DE DA76
Gerhard Sittig   true | mail -s "get gpg key" Gerhard.Sittig@gmx.net
-- 
     If you don't understand or are scared by any of the above
             ask your parents or an adult to help you.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Jan 28  6:28: 1 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from pop3.psconsult.nl (ps226.psconsult.nl [193.67.147.226])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E69837B400
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 06:27:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from paul@localhost)
	by pop3.psconsult.nl (8.9.2/8.9.2) id PAA52029;
	Sun, 28 Jan 2001 15:27:16 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from paul)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 15:27:16 +0100
From: Paul Schenkeveld <fb-stable@psconsult.nl>
To: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl>
Cc: Bill Moran <wmoran@mail.iowna.com>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Additional BIND ???s (was Re: Problems with BIND in 4.2-STABLE (resource leak?))
Message-ID: <20010128152716.A51576@psconsult.nl>
References: <3A72474D.979B84FA@mail.iowna.com> <20010127100200.B51681@lucifer.bart.nl> <3A72E375.C71C175F@mail.iowna.com> <20010127191958.D51681@lucifer.bart.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i
In-Reply-To: <20010127191958.D51681@lucifer.bart.nl>; from jruigrok@via-net-works.nl on Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 07:19:58PM +0100
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hi,

Yesterday I did a quick port of 8.2.3 after reading the email from
Paul Vixie.

I started with the 8.2.2P7 port had had to change the distinfo (put
in the MD5 checksums from Paul Vixies email) and patch-ac (it turned
out that all the patch files in 8.2.2P7 did was adapting the Makefiles
to the FreeBSD ports system).

Here's the new patch-ac (strip the | in front):

|--- src/bin/Makefile.old	Sat Dec 23 09:02:48 2000
|+++ src/bin/Makefile	Sat Jan 27 16:32:30 2001
|@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
| 	"VER=${VER}" "STRIP=${STRIP}" "PS=${PS}" "INSTALL_LIB=${INSTALL_LIB}" \
| 	"INSTALL_EXEC=${INSTALL_EXEC}" "BOUNDS=${BOUNDS}"
| 
|-CFLAGS=	${CDEBUG}
|+CFLAGS= 
| CPPFLAGS= -I${PORTINCL} -I${INCL}
| 
| SUBDIRS = addr nslookup dig dnsquery host named named-xfer ndc nsupdate \

Cheers!

Paul Schenkeveld, Consultant
PSconsult ICT Services BV

On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 07:19:58PM +0100, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
> -On [20010127 16:10], Bill Moran (wmoran@mail.iowna.com) wrote:
> >Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
> >> 
> >> [snip RAM problem]
> >> 
> >> >Has anyone else seen this, or have I got some unique problem here?
> >> 
> >> There were a fair amount of bugs in 8.2.3 betas.
> >> 
> >> I am in the progress of preparing the import, and importing 8.2.3, which
> >> is the released version.  As soon as I have it imported in CURRENT, and
> >> after I have done my usual round of testing in STABLE I will MFC it.
> >
> >In a nutshell then, you're telling me:
> >a) problems like this have been seen before
> 
> No, where did I say that?  I merely said that there are a few bugs in
> BIND TxB.  But BIND 8.2.2-pX have problems as well.
> 
> I just read over the CHANGES and there have been fixed a number of
> memory leaks.  So you might be tripping over these.
> 
> >b) the solution is to use a different version of BIND
> 
> Possibly.
> 
> >That brings me to one other question:
> >In reviewing the list archives I noticed some early complaints about
> >beta code being used in -STABLE. The response to this was (if I
> >understood it correctly) that the 8.2.3 beta code was better than the
> >8.2.2 stable code.
> 
> 8.2.2 has had problems as well.  And the MFC was done in the prospect
> that the beta period would not take over 6 months.
> 
> >The ultimate reason for this question is simple: Should I switch to bind
> >8.2.2 or wait for the latest MFC? Is 8.2.2 going to increase the
> >reliability of this machine or am I better off dealing with 8.2.3 for
> >now? This is a production machine and I'd like to get it to as stable a
> >point as possible and quit messing with it.
> 
> 8.2.3 hasn't had problems with regard to security as 8.2.2 has/had.
> 
> -- 
> Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven          VIA Net.Works The Netherlands
> BSD: Technical excellence at its best  Network- and systemadministrator
> 	  D78D D0AD 244D 1D12 C9CA  7152 035C 1138 546A B867
> Misery loves company...
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Jan 28  7:46:59 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from netcabo.pt (unknown [212.113.161.137])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39FF737B402
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 07:46:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from netcabo ([213.22.31.177]) by netcabo.pt  with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.537.53);
	 Sun, 28 Jan 2001 15:45:07 +0000
From: "Bruno Miguel" <brunomiguel@netcabo.pt>
Organization: Artists, Inc.
To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 15:44:50 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: IPFilter will not allow traceroute anymore
Reply-To: brunomiguel@netcabo.pt
Message-ID: <3A743E72.3727.1396DB@localhost>
In-reply-to: <3A739F7A.CF03E750@rshb.com.ru>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote:
> 
> > You're probably better of installing IPF 3.4.16.  There have been many
> > bugfixes and improvements since 3.4.8 (version of IPF packaged with
> > FreeBSD-STABLE).
> I tried to install IPF 3.4.16 yesterday on fresh -STABLE, but after this
> my kernel couldn't be made. whilte making depend I got

Find the correct path for osreldate.h and you see it is not where ip_compat.c 
is looking for it. You will need to fix a couple paths on a couple files. Why 
not use modules ? :-)
This error is going on for a long time now, I dunno why Darren hasn't fixed it 
yet, though.


      
      ...:-=>> The freaking Mail Band <<=-:...
                  hununu@netcabo.pt
             D.E.Q. @ I.S.T. - Portugal


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Jan 28  7:49:37 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from netcabo.pt (unknown [212.113.161.137])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD9F237B400
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 07:49:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from netcabo ([213.22.31.177]) by netcabo.pt  with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.537.53);
	 Sun, 28 Jan 2001 15:47:47 +0000
From: "Bruno Miguel" <brunomiguel@netcabo.pt>
Organization: Artists, Inc.
To: stable@freebsd.org
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 15:47:30 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: ipnat vs natd and ipf vs ipfw (fwd)
Reply-To: brunomiguel@netcabo.pt
Message-ID: <3A743F12.32501.160793@localhost>
In-reply-to: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101271919450.35303-100000@espen.oysnet.lan>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> Ipfw and ipf to my eye (without glasses that is) seem to do pretty much the same
> thing. The same is true for ipnat and natd. Of course there are differences
> between the two (ritgh?).

How do you map with a single rule a pool of private addresses into a pool of 
real addresses with natd ? :>

> Currently, I have ipfw and natd doing their job fairly well. Is there any point
> in switching (yeah,yeah, don't fix it if it ain't broken).

ipnat's ability to let you use non PASV mode in natted boxes for ftp when 
you specify the ports is nice.
It's mainly personal taste. 
      
      ...:-=>> The freaking Mail Band <<=-:...
                  hununu@netcabo.pt
             D.E.Q. @ I.S.T. - Portugal


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Jan 28  9:40:56 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from westhost15.westhost.net (westhost15.westhost.net [216.71.84.69])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF15737B404
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 09:40:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from beast (h0020af68b314.ne.mediaone.net [24.91.189.27])
	by westhost15.westhost.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA09290
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 11:51:57 -0600
From: "Paul A. Howes" <pahowes@fair-ware.com>
To: <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Double Man Pages...
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 12:40:32 -0500
Message-ID: <BCEFKOJHNDEAJONMKMHEKEHCCHAA.pahowes@fair-ware.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

All-

When I install a machine with a fresh 4.2-RELEASE distro, the "man" command
works as expected.  When I use cvsup to bring the machine up to 4.2-STABLE
for the first time, man shows every manual page twice.  By that, I mean, the
manual page displays normally, and instead of exiting back to a command line
prompt, the whole thing is displayed again, requiring me to either page
through it, or hit "q" to exit.  The "info" command has the same behavior:
The manual page is in the buffer twice, in its entirety.

Is this a problem others have seen?  Or do I just have something screwy in
my configuration?

--
Paul A. Howes
pahowes@fair-ware.com



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Jan 28 10: 0:23 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from veldy.net (w028.z064001117.msp-mn.dsl.cnc.net [64.1.117.28])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DFF137B400
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 10:00:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cascade (cascade.veldy.net [64.1.117.29])
	by veldy.net (Postfix) with SMTP
	id CBD3C8C4B; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 11:59:14 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <002b01c08953$fe59c200$1d750140@cascade>
From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net>
To: "Gerhard Sittig" <Gerhard.Sittig@gmx.net>
Cc: <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101271919450.35303-100000@espen.oysnet.lan> <20010128082318.U253@speedy.gsinet>
Subject: Re: ipnat vs natd and ipf vs ipfw (fwd)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 11:59:00 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Curiosity is one answer.  Another allows somebody to offer multiple
solutions to a problem - each with their own benefits (presumably).

Tom Veldhouse
veldy@veldy.net

----- Original Message -----
From: "Gerhard Sittig" <Gerhard.Sittig@gmx.net>
To: <stable@freebsd.org>
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2001 1:23 AM
Subject: Re: ipnat vs natd and ipf vs ipfw (fwd)


> On Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 19:20 -0500, Espen Oyslebo wrote:
> >
> > Ipfw and ipf to my eye (without glasses that is) seem to do
> > pretty much the same thing. The same is true for ipnat and
> > natd. Of course there are differences between the two (ritgh?).
> >
> > If so:
> > What are they?
>
> This has been hashed over a few hundred times in the lists.  You
> might want to visit the archives.
>
> > Currently, I have ipfw and natd doing their job fairly well. Is
> > there any point in switching (yeah,yeah, don't fix it if it
> > ain't broken).
>
> Exactly!  If it works for you, why would you want to risk it?  If
> you feel like something's missing, what is it?  Then check if ipf
> could do it for you.
>
>
> virtually yours   82D1 9B9C 01DC 4FB4 D7B4  61BE 3F49 4F77 72DE DA76
> Gerhard Sittig   true | mail -s "get gpg key" Gerhard.Sittig@gmx.net
> --
>      If you don't understand or are scared by any of the above
>              ask your parents or an adult to help you.
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
>



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Jan 28 10:59:45 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from cc762335-a.ebnsk1.nj.home.com (cc762335-a.ebnsk1.nj.home.com [24.3.219.36])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 254B337B400
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 10:59:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 98512 invoked from network); 28 Jan 2001 18:58:13 -0000
Received: from athena.faerun.com (HELO athena) (192.168.0.2)
  by cc762335-a.ebnsk1.nj.home.com with SMTP; 28 Jan 2001 18:58:13 -0000
Message-Id: <4.2.2.20010128134600.00d913d0@netmail.home.com>
X-Sender: damascus@netmail.home.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2 
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 13:49:33 -0500
To: "Paul A. Howes" <pahowes@fair-ware.com>
From: Carroll Kong <damascus@home.com>
Subject: Re: Double Man Pages...
Cc: <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
In-Reply-To: <BCEFKOJHNDEAJONMKMHEKEHCCHAA.pahowes@fair-ware.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

At 12:40 PM 1/28/01 -0500, Paul A. Howes wrote:
>All-
>
>When I install a machine with a fresh 4.2-RELEASE distro, the "man" command
>works as expected.  When I use cvsup to bring the machine up to 4.2-STABLE
>for the first time, man shows every manual page twice.  By that, I mean, the
>manual page displays normally, and instead of exiting back to a command line
>prompt, the whole thing is displayed again, requiring me to either page
>through it, or hit "q" to exit.  The "info" command has the same behavior:
>The manual page is in the buffer twice, in its entirety.
>
>Is this a problem others have seen?  Or do I just have something screwy in
>my configuration?
>
>--
>Paul A. Howes
>pahowes@fair-ware.com

It might mean you have the compressed man page and the uncompressed man 
page.  Do a find on the man page dirs, and see if you got .gz extensions 
and just normal .1 or .2 extensions.  You might be able to fix it by 
running find and executing a gzip command on them.

-Carroll Kong



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Jan 28 11: 9:37 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from zardoc.endmail.org (adsl-63-195-85-27.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.195.85.27])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB8637B69B
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 11:09:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from ca@localhost)
	by zardoc.endmail.org (8.12.0.Beta1/8.12.0.Beta1) id f0SJ7fQh020782;
	Sun, 28 Jan 2001 11:07:41 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 11:07:41 -0800
From: Claus Assmann <freebsd+stable@esmtp.org>
To: Mike Atkinson <mikea@kconline.com>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: LAME domains, sendmail BIND and FreeBSD- its FreeBSDspecific  it seems (was more strange DNS issues in BINDand STABLE.)-
Message-ID: <20010128110741.A6717@zardoc.endmail.org>
References: <034601c08827$b8e08d80$1385f1d8@kconline.com> <4.2.2.20010127001841.03015358@marble.sentex.net> <4.2.2.20010127204048.013addb0@marble.sentex.net> <T6vYbJveQt@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org> <047e01c0890d$9f42a8e0$1385f1d8@kconline.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <047e01c0890d$9f42a8e0$1385f1d8@kconline.com>; from mikea@kconline.com on Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 04:35:16AM -0500
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Sun, Jan 28, 2001, Mike Atkinson wrote:
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dirk Meyer" <dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org>
> >
> > Please tweak the lines in the sendmail port:
> > files/site.config.m4 to build without NETINET6 or without TCPWRAPPERS.
> 
> Removing the NETINET6 lines from files/site.config.m4 seems to have
> corrected the problem.

This seems to be the explanation:

$ dig supercom.ca. aaaa

; <<>> DiG 8.1 <<>> supercom.ca. aaaa 
;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch
;; got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 6
;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
;; QUERY SECTION:
;;      supercom.ca, type = AAAA, class = IN


8.12 will most likely have a workaround for this (as usual sendmail
provides a workaround for almost every broken configuration...)

	New ResolverOptions setting: WorkAroundBrokenAAAA.  When
		attempting to canonify a hostname, some broken nameservers
		will return SERVFAIL (a temporary failure) on T_AAAA (IPv6)
		lookups.  If you want to excuse this behavior, use this new
		flag.  Suggested by Chris Foote of SE Network Access and
		Mark Roth of the University of Illinois at
		Urbana-Champaign.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Jan 28 11:26:51 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from pro.fais.net (unknown [208.249.141.254])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id AB1FB37B69B; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 11:26:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gateway.drnet.fais.net (drnet.fais.net [208.249.141.246])
	by pro.fais.net (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian/GNU) with ESMTP id OAA32747;
	Sun, 28 Jan 2001 14:09:19 -0600
Received: from gateway.drnet.fais.net (jwpauler@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by gateway.drnet.fais.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f0SJPqY83376;
	Sun, 28 Jan 2001 13:25:53 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from jwpauler@jwpages.com)
From: "Justin W. Pauler" <jwpauler@jwpages.com>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: tail
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 13:25:51 -0600
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.99]
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01012813255100.83352@gateway.drnet.fais.net>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

I am not sure if this is a command, but if not, I think it would be useful. I 
have often needed to watch output from different commands like df, but I have 
to continously run the command to get the latest amount. I was thinking, why 
couldn't tail do that? Since it can watch files for changes and display 
those, why not for a command?

I tried tail -f |df -h and could not get it to update. I would appreciate 
your thoughts.

I am also cc'ing this to stable in cause it is a bug/feature...

-jwp

-- 
Justin W. Pauler
FlexiShell Internet Services <http://www.flexishell.com>
E-Mail: jwpauler@jwpages.com
WWW: http://www.jwpages.com
IRC: drnet@#EggDrop, Undernet IRC Network

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
One seldom sees a monument to a committee.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Jan 28 11:53:24 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mindcrime.bit0.com (mindcrime.bit0.com [216.7.69.69])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB27137B400
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 11:53:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (mandrews@localhost)
	by mindcrime.bit0.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f0SJmKS45863;
	Sun, 28 Jan 2001 14:48:20 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from mandrews@bit0.com)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 14:48:20 -0500 (EST)
From: Mike Andrews <mandrews@bit0.com>
To: Claus Assmann <freebsd+stable@esmtp.org>
Cc: Mike Atkinson <mikea@kconline.com>, <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: LAME domains, sendmail BIND and FreeBSD- its FreeBSDspecific 
 it seems (was more strange DNS issues in BINDand STABLE.)-
In-Reply-To: <20010128110741.A6717@zardoc.endmail.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.32.0101281446480.45648-100000@mindcrime.bit0.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Claus Assmann wrote:

> On Sun, Jan 28, 2001, Mike Atkinson wrote:
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Dirk Meyer" <dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org>
> > >
> > > Please tweak the lines in the sendmail port:
> > > files/site.config.m4 to build without NETINET6 or without TCPWRAPPERS.
> >
> > Removing the NETINET6 lines from files/site.config.m4 seems to have
> > corrected the problem.
>
> This seems to be the explanation:
>
> $ dig supercom.ca. aaaa
>
> ; <<>> DiG 8.1 <<>> supercom.ca. aaaa
> ;; res options: init recurs defnam dnsrch
> ;; got answer:
> ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: SERVFAIL, id: 6
> ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 0, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0
> ;; QUERY SECTION:
> ;;      supercom.ca, type = AAAA, class = IN
>
>
> 8.12 will most likely have a workaround for this (as usual sendmail
> provides a workaround for almost every broken configuration...)
>
> 	New ResolverOptions setting: WorkAroundBrokenAAAA.  When
> 		attempting to canonify a hostname, some broken nameservers
> 		will return SERVFAIL (a temporary failure) on T_AAAA (IPv6)
> 		lookups.  If you want to excuse this behavior, use this new
> 		flag.  Suggested by Chris Foote of SE Network Access and
> 		Mark Roth of the University of Illinois at
> 		Urbana-Champaign.


Wow, that's pretty bizarre.  Finally an explanation that makes some sense
though... thanks guys!



Mike Andrews * mandrews@dcr.net * mandrews@bit0.com * http://www.bit0.com
VP, sysadmin, & network guy, Digital Crescent Inc, Frankfort KY
Internet access for Frankfort, Lexington, Louisville and surrounding counties
www.fark.com: If it's not news, it's Fark.  (Or something like that.)



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Jan 28 13:20:44 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mailhost01.reflexnet.net (mailhost01.reflexnet.net [64.6.192.82])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0983837B400
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 13:20:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com ([216.196.73.168]) by mailhost01.reflexnet.net  with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.197.19);
	 Sun, 28 Jan 2001 13:18:35 -0800
Received: (from cjc@localhost)
	by rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f0SLKYm90711;
	Sun, 28 Jan 2001 13:20:34 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from cjc)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 13:20:28 -0800
From: "Crist J. Clark" <cjclark@reflexnet.net>
To: Kal Torak <kaltorak@quake.com.au>
Cc: FreeBSD-stable <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: ipfw forwarding (more info)
Message-ID: <20010128132028.W10761@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex>
Reply-To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu
References: <3A72CB47.7A5DD83@quake.com.au> <20010127220257.B28504@nevermind.kiev.ua> <3A732BE9.F559820D@quake.com.au> <3A732EFB.E7E743BA@quake.com.au> <20010127170621.M10761@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex> <3A7411CF.816DA573@quake.com.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i
In-Reply-To: <3A7411CF.816DA573@quake.com.au>; from kaltorak@quake.com.au on Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 11:34:23PM +1100
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 11:34:23PM +1100, Kal Torak wrote:
> > > After some more fiddling around, I have noticed that the ipfw rule is
> > > hit, but nothing seems to happen... The data just continues on to the
> > > local port instead of being forwarded to the remote one...
> > 
> > Are you sure? Please try,
> > 
> >   # tcpdump -i <iface> -en port 27015
> > 
> > On each interface that would be involved.
> > 
> > > Maybe I am missing something that needs to be loaded for this to work?
> > 
> > No, forwarding is all in the kernel (or KLD module).
> > 
> > But I suspect you really don't want to forward packets, but actually
> > want to do NAT.
> 
> Yeah using the redirect_port option in natd works, but I dont understand
> why it doesnt work with ipfw... I thought natd might be stopping, but even
> having the fwd rule before the divert to natd rule doesnt change anything..
> Dose ipfw fwd even work to remote machines?

Yes, it works. No, it does not work how you want it to. The 'fwd'
directive does exactly what it says, it forwards a packet to some
location. What it does NOT do is change the packet in any way. That
is, when you forward a packet to another machine, the packet arrives
at the next machine (or next hop on the way there) with the
destination IP address unchanged from the original packet. I doubt the
machine you are sending this to does anything with a packet not
addressed to it.

> It would be better to do this with ipfw,

ipfw(8) does not do NAT. Besides the fact you want the 'fwd' rule to
actually rewrite the packet, what happens to the return traffic? Where
is the rule to change addresses back? You need to maintain a state
table of all of the NAT'ed connections. There is a reason FreeBSD
chose the path of doing NAT in userspace.

> since you can add rules on the fly,
> but with natd you need to kill it to change those settings...

But how often are you changing these things?

> Would ipf be
> better maybe?
 
See ipnat(1,5).
-- 
Crist J. Clark                           cjclark@alum.mit.edu


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Jan 28 13:23: 2 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from post.mail.nl.demon.net (post-10.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.20])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 42DCA37B400; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 13:22:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [212.238.77.116] (helo=gateway.raggedclown.intra)
	by post.mail.nl.demon.net with smtp (Exim 3.14 #2)
	id 14MzHO-0007Zb-00; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 21:22:34 +0000
Received: by buffy.raggedclown.net (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.0 (i386), from userid 500)
	id F417312D3D; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 22:18:01 +0100 (CET)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 22:18:01 +0100
From: Cliff Sarginson <cliff@raggedclown.net>
To: "Justin W. Pauler" <jwpauler@jwpages.com>
Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: tail
Message-ID: <20010128221801.A2923@raggedclown.net>
References: <01012813255100.83352@gateway.drnet.fais.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <01012813255100.83352@gateway.drnet.fais.net>; from jwpauler@jwpages.com on Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 01:25:51PM -0600
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 01:25:51PM -0600, Justin W. Pauler wrote:
> I am not sure if this is a command, but if not, I think it would be useful. I 
> have often needed to watch output from different commands like df, but I have 
> to continously run the command to get the latest amount. I was thinking, why 
> couldn't tail do that? Since it can watch files for changes and display 
> those, why not for a command?
> 
> I tried tail -f |df -h and could not get it to update. I would appreciate 
> your thoughts.
> 
> I am also cc'ing this to stable in cause it is a bug/feature...

Mmm.. methinks you are confused !
The command as you tyoed it will have tail read it;s standard input,
the terminal, and pipe it's output into df. Since df is not a filter
it will ignore it. If it would work then you would need to change
it around to "df | tail -f".
However df will only execute once, so that won;t do what you want.
To repeatedly execute a command put it in a loop:

while :
do df
done

If you want it to wait a while put a sleep in it, to space it
out put an echo..e.g.

while :
do df
sleep 2
echo
done

However, on Linux there is a program called "watch" that repeatedly
executes a command an displays it on the screen updating the
display "in place" .. so it does not scroll away. I am sure there
must be a similar program on BSD (I would like to know as well!)
but the program named "watch" on FBSD is something
different.

Cliff




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Jan 28 13:24:58 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from hal9000.bsdonline.org (ffaxvawx3-4-047.cox.rr.com [24.168.203.47])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6455937B699
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 13:24:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: by hal9000.bsdonline.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 45B871FC4; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 16:24:29 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 16:24:29 -0500
From: Andrew J Caines <A.J.Caines@altavista.net>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: syslogd throwing a hissy fit
Message-ID: <20010128162429.A412@hal9000.bsdonline.org>
Reply-To: Andrew J Caines <A.J.Caines@altavista.net>
Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
References: <20010121021039.A442@hal9000.bsdonline.org> <7q9u6t0tkj5ktplad6k8468koar3j8jvi9@4ax.com> <s7hu6torq3c79usoqpgig3b56gg9d5n6jr@4ax.com> <20010124223705.A92362@gosset.maths.tcd.ie> <5qou6tkiba9jk6nbjepe9hn2g45hq560ep@4ax.com> <20010121021039.A442@hal9000.bsdonline.org> <7q9u6t0tkj5ktplad6k8468koar3j8jvi9@4ax.com> <s7hu6torq3c79usoqpgig3b56gg9d5n6jr@4ax.com> <20010124223705.A92362@gosset.maths.tcd.ie>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20010124223705.A92362@gosset.maths.tcd.ie>; from dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie on Wed, Jan 24, 2001 at 10:37:05PM +0000
Organization: H.A.L. Plant
X-Powered-by: FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE
Importance: Normal
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Folks,

Thanks to David Malone and Tony Byrne for their responses concerning this
most most unusual syslogd behaviour.

After the last cvsup on Thursday night, build and install there is no
change in the fit that syslogd throws when started. This is no surprise,
since there is nothing clearly related to syslog in the last update.

I have confirmed that this behaviour does not depend on the presence of
the new "console" facility enabled in syslog.conf, although the problem
clearly points to this new addition as a factor. Nor does the problem
depend on the arguments with which syslogd is invoked.

I am surprised to have not seen more people reporting this problem since
it occurred out of the blue in my fairly vanilla setup and is extremely
visible.

I have made a bunch of related information available on my web site at

	<http://hal9000.bsdonline.org/tmp/>

including my main config files, cvsup, build and install logs and a sample
output from running "syslog -d". Here's and extract from this output:

logmsg: pri 166, flags 16, from hal9000, msg Jan 28 03:54:08 <console.info>=
 hal9000 /kernel: Jan 28 03:54:08 <console.info> hal9000 /kernel: Jan 28 03=
:54:08 <console.info> hal9000 /kernel: Jan 28 03:54:08 <console.info> hal90=
00 /kernel: Jan 28 03:54:08 <console.info> hal9000 /kernel: Jan 28 03:54:07=
 <console.info> hal9000 /kernel: Jan 28 03:54:07 <console.info> hal9000 /ke=
rnel: Jan 28 03:54:07 <console.info> hal9000 /kernel: Jan 28 03:54:07 <cons=
ole.info> hal9000 /kernel: Jan 28 03:54:07 <console.info> hal9000 /kernel: =
Jan 28 03:54:07 <console.info> hal9000 /kernel: Jan 28 03:54:07 <console.in=
fo> hal9000 /kernel: Jan 28 03:54:07 <console.info> hal9000 /kernel: Jan 28=
 03:54:07 <console.info> hal9000 /kernel: Jan 28 03:54:07 <console.info> ha=
l9000 /kernel: Jan 28 03:54:07 <console.info> hal9000 /kernel: Jan 28 03:54=
:07 <console.info> hal9000 /kernel: Jan 28 03:54:07 <console.info> hal9000 =
/kernel: Jan 28 03:54:07 <console.info> hal9000 /kernel: Jan 28 03:54:07 <c=
onsole.info> hal9000 /kernel: Jan 28 03:54:07 <
console.info> hal9000 /kernel: Jan 28 03:
Logging to CONSOLE /dev/console
logmsg: pri 2, flags 17, from hal9000, msg 54:07 <console.info> hal9000 /ke=
rnel: Jan 28=20
msg repeated 4 times, 0 sec of 30
msg repeated 4 times, 0 sec of 30


Assistance and recommendations are most welcome, as I am unhappy running
without syslogd and am at a loss to address the problem.


Thanks.


-Andrew-
--=20
 _______________________________________________________________________
| -Andrew J. Caines-   Unix Systems Engineer   A.J.Caines@altavista.net |


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Jan 28 15:24:20 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from www.golsyd.net.au (ftp.golsyd.net.au [203.57.20.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C3CD37B400
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 15:24:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [203.164.12.28] by www.quake.com.au (NTMail 4.30.0012/AH9370.63.d1acf55c) with ESMTP id fuwsaaaa for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 10:32:41 +1100
Message-ID: <3A74AA27.9E30C7C2@quake.com.au>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 10:24:23 +1100
From: Kal Torak <kaltorak@quake.com.au>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu
Cc: FreeBSD-stable <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: ipfw forwarding (more info)
References: <3A72CB47.7A5DD83@quake.com.au> <20010127220257.B28504@nevermind.kiev.ua> <3A732BE9.F559820D@quake.com.au> <3A732EFB.E7E743BA@quake.com.au> <20010127170621.M10761@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex> <3A7411CF.816DA573@quake.com.au> <20010128132028.W10761@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> > Yeah using the redirect_port option in natd works, but I dont understand
> > why it doesnt work with ipfw... I thought natd might be stopping, but even
> > having the fwd rule before the divert to natd rule doesnt change anything..
> > Dose ipfw fwd even work to remote machines?
> 
> Yes, it works. No, it does not work how you want it to. The 'fwd'
> directive does exactly what it says, it forwards a packet to some
> location. What it does NOT do is change the packet in any way. That
> is, when you forward a packet to another machine, the packet arrives
> at the next machine (or next hop on the way there) with the
> destination IP address unchanged from the original packet. I doubt the
> machine you are sending this to does anything with a packet not
> addressed to it.

Ahhh, now I see... And since the packet was addressed to the machine that
was forwarding it, it never actually went anywhere...
I had thought the fwd rule changed the destination address on the packet
not just the next hop address...

Since I was just trying to change where some udp data ended up I thought
that would be a good way since it doesnt need to be nat'd... The data would
arrive, the server would reply sending to the gateway which would perform nat
on the out going udp packets, then the clients would send more which would
go back to the server as if it was the gateway... Oh well it seemed like a
good idea at the time...

Thanks for clearing that up :)
Kal.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Jan 28 15:48:40 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from milquetoast.cs.mcgill.ca (milquetoast.CS.McGill.CA [132.206.2.5])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8141E37B400
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 15:48:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from andrewb@localhost)
	by milquetoast.cs.mcgill.ca (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA17037;
	Sun, 28 Jan 2001 18:48:01 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 18:48:01 -0500
From: Andrew BOGECHO <andrewb@cs.mcgill.ca>
To: Andrew J Caines <A.J.Caines@altavista.net>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: syslogd throwing a hissy fit
Message-ID: <20010128184801.C16717@cs.mcgill.ca>
Mail-Followup-To: Andrew BOGECHO <andrewb@cs.mcgill.ca>,
	Andrew J Caines <A.J.Caines@altavista.net>,
	freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
References: <20010121021039.A442@hal9000.bsdonline.org> <7q9u6t0tkj5ktplad6k8468koar3j8jvi9@4ax.com> <s7hu6torq3c79usoqpgig3b56gg9d5n6jr@4ax.com> <20010124223705.A92362@gosset.maths.tcd.ie> <5qou6tkiba9jk6nbjepe9hn2g45hq560ep@4ax.com> <20010121021039.A442@hal9000.bsdonline.org> <7q9u6t0tkj5ktplad6k8468koar3j8jvi9@4ax.com> <s7hu6torq3c79usoqpgig3b56gg9d5n6jr@4ax.com> <20010124223705.A92362@gosset.maths.tcd.ie> <20010128162429.A412@hal9000.bsdonline.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20010128162429.A412@hal9000.bsdonline.org>; from A.J.Caines@altavista.net on Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 04:24:29PM -0500
Organization: SOCS, McGill University, Montreal, CANADA
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Sun Jan 28 18:33:27 EST 2001

Hi Andrew,

It has been happening to me only when I pipe things to /dev/console.
Otherwise none of the messages show up. This unfortunately means that
the perl script that I run to tail all.log and pipe info I want to
/dev/console cannot be used as it continuously spits out the kernel
messages. To test my theory further, just doing a

tail -f /var/log/all.log > /dev/console

and then slogin into the machine, or run an ls and it
causes the same effect. Killing the tail sets everything back to
quiet.

I have tried cvsups from the 20th of Jan to the 26th, and this problem
seems to occur each time. I even did a clean 4.2 install, but as soon
as I did a cvsup to the latest stable, the problem reoccured.

Any tips would be helpful.

Andrew.

On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 04:24:29PM -0500, Andrew J Caines wrote:
> Folks,
>=20
> Thanks to David Malone and Tony Byrne for their responses concerning this
> most most unusual syslogd behaviour.
>=20
> After the last cvsup on Thursday night, build and install there is no
> change in the fit that syslogd throws when started. This is no surprise,
> since there is nothing clearly related to syslog in the last update.
>=20
> I have confirmed that this behaviour does not depend on the presence of
> the new "console" facility enabled in syslog.conf, although the problem
> clearly points to this new addition as a factor. Nor does the problem
> depend on the arguments with which syslogd is invoked.
>=20
> I am surprised to have not seen more people reporting this problem since
> it occurred out of the blue in my fairly vanilla setup and is extremely
> visible.
>=20
> I have made a bunch of related information available on my web site at
>=20
> 	<http://hal9000.bsdonline.org/tmp/>
>=20
> including my main config files, cvsup, build and install logs and a sample
> output from running "syslog -d". Here's and extract from this output:
>=20
> logmsg: pri 166, flags 16, from hal9000, msg Jan 28 03:54:08 <console.inf=
o> hal9000 /kernel: Jan 28 03:54:08 <console.info> hal9000 /kernel: Jan 28 =
03:54:08 <console.info> hal9000 /kernel: Jan 28 03:54:08 <console.info> hal=
9000 /kernel: Jan 28 03:54:08 <console.info> hal9000 /kernel: Jan 28 03:54:=
07 <console.info> hal9000 /kernel: Jan 28 03:54:07 <console.info> hal9000 /=
kernel: Jan 28 03:54:07 <console.info> hal9000 /kernel: Jan 28 03:54:07 <co=
nsole.info> hal9000 /kernel: Jan 28 03:54:07 <console.info> hal9000 /kernel=
: Jan 28 03:54:07 <console.info> hal9000 /kernel: Jan 28 03:54:07 <console.=
info> hal9000 /kernel: Jan 28 03:54:07 <console.info> hal9000 /kernel: Jan =
28 03:54:07 <console.info> hal9000 /kernel: Jan 28 03:54:07 <console.info> =
hal9000 /kernel: Jan 28 03:54:07 <console.info> hal9000 /kernel: Jan 28 03:=
54:07 <console.info> hal9000 /kernel: Jan 28 03:54:07 <console.info> hal900=
0 /kernel: Jan 28 03:54:07 <console.info> hal9000 /kernel: Jan 28 03:54:07 =
<console.info> hal9000 /kernel: Jan 28 03:54:07 <
> console.info> hal9000 /kernel: Jan 28 03:
> Logging to CONSOLE /dev/console
> logmsg: pri 2, flags 17, from hal9000, msg 54:07 <console.info> hal9000 /=
kernel: Jan 28=20
> msg repeated 4 times, 0 sec of 30
> msg repeated 4 times, 0 sec of 30
>=20
>=20
> Assistance and recommendations are most welcome, as I am unhappy running
> without syslogd and am at a loss to address the problem.
>=20
>=20
> Thanks.
>=20
>=20
> -Andrew-
> --=20
>  _______________________________________________________________________
> | -Andrew J. Caines-   Unix Systems Engineer   A.J.Caines@altavista.net |
>=20
>=20
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Jan 28 15:53:49 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from clmboh1-smtp3.columbus.rr.com (unknown [65.24.0.112])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9086D37B404
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 15:53:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.iowna.com (dhcp065-024-023-038.columbus.rr.com [65.24.23.38])
	by clmboh1-smtp3.columbus.rr.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f0SNp9r03330
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 18:51:10 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <3A74B023.1E2D4D4A@mail.iowna.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 18:49:55 -0500
From: Bill Moran <wmoran@mail.iowna.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE i386)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: rpc.statd mem leak?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

I seem to be "memory leak guy" this month ...

Is it normal for rpc.statd to soak up 257M (as reported by top in the
size column)? The "res" column shows 542K.
The machine seems to be functioning just fine otherwise. It just seems a
little unusual.
It's a 4.2-STABLE (Jan 8) machine and it's servicing 2 NFS connections
as well as running samba and netatalk. Not much else going on other than
Vinum mirrored drives and nightly backups using dump.

-Bill


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Jan 28 16: 8:28 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from hal9000.bsdonline.org (ffaxvawx3-4-047.cox.rr.com [24.168.203.47])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3F95F37B6A0; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 16:08:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by hal9000.bsdonline.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 170EC1F25; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 19:07:57 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 19:07:56 -0500
From: Andrew J Caines <A.J.Caines@altavista.net>
To: Andrew BOGECHO <andrewb@cs.mcgill.ca>
Cc: FreeBSD Stable <stable@freebsd.org>,
	Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: syslogd throwing a hissy fit
Message-ID: <20010128190756.C372@hal9000.bsdonline.org>
Reply-To: Andrew J Caines <A.J.Caines@altavista.net>
Mail-Followup-To: Andrew BOGECHO <andrewb@cs.mcgill.ca>,
	FreeBSD Stable <stable@freebsd.org>,
	Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@FreeBSD.org>
References: <7q9u6t0tkj5ktplad6k8468koar3j8jvi9@4ax.com> <s7hu6torq3c79usoqpgig3b56gg9d5n6jr@4ax.com> <20010124223705.A92362@gosset.maths.tcd.ie> <5qou6tkiba9jk6nbjepe9hn2g45hq560ep@4ax.com> <20010121021039.A442@hal9000.bsdonline.org> <7q9u6t0tkj5ktplad6k8468koar3j8jvi9@4ax.com> <s7hu6torq3c79usoqpgig3b56gg9d5n6jr@4ax.com> <20010124223705.A92362@gosset.maths.tcd.ie> <20010128162429.A412@hal9000.bsdonline.org> <20010128184801.C16717@cs.mcgill.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20010128184801.C16717@cs.mcgill.ca>; from andrewb@cs.mcgill.ca on Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 06:48:01PM -0500
Organization: H.A.L. Plant
X-Powered-by: FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE
Importance: Normal
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Andrew,

> It has been happening to me only when I pipe things to /dev/console.
> Otherwise none of the messages show up.

Hmm. I just sent a bunch of stuff to /dev/console including a "tail -f" on
a writing log file as you did, but didn't see anything unusual.

I then removed the /dev/console line from syslog.conf and started syslogd,
but it had another tantrum.

> Any tips would be helpful.

The finger is still pointing to the following MFC (from cvsweb):

----8<---
CVS log for src/usr.sbin/syslogd/syslogd.c
Default branch: MAIN
Revision 1.59.2.4 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Tue Jan 9 06:51:37 2001 UTC (2 weeks, 5 days
ago) by phk 
Branch: RELENG_4 
Changes since 1.59.2.3: +3 -1 lines
Diff to previous 1.59.2.3 (colored) to branchpoint 1.59 (colored) next main 1.60 (colored)

MFC: Add LOG_CONSOLE and make sure it doesn't end up on /dev/console.
----8<---

Maybe the committer, Poul-Henning Kamp, can shed some light. I've CC'ed
him on this. If that doesn't get us anywhere, I'l go ahead and file a PR.


-Andrew-
-- 
 _______________________________________________________________________
| -Andrew J. Caines-   Unix Systems Engineer   A.J.Caines@altavista.net |


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Jan 28 16:19:26 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from scully.zoominternet.net (scully.zoominternet.net [63.67.120.3])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5CB1437B6A0
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 16:19:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 26120 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2001 00:15:59 -0000
Received: from acs-24-154-31-153.zoominternet.net (24.154.31.153)
  by scully.zoominternet.net with SMTP; 29 Jan 2001 00:15:59 -0000
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 19:19:08 -0500 (EST)
From: Donn Miller <dmmiller@cvzoom.net>
X-X-Sender:  <dmmiller@acs-24-154-31-153.zoominternet.net>
To: Bill Moran <wmoran@mail.iowna.com>
Cc: <stable@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: rpc.statd mem leak?
In-Reply-To: <3A74B023.1E2D4D4A@mail.iowna.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0101281918001.452-100000@acs-24-154-31-153.zoominternet.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Bill Moran wrote:

> I seem to be "memory leak guy" this month ...
>
> Is it normal for rpc.statd to soak up 257M (as reported by top in the
> size column)? The "res" column shows 542K.

What CFLAGS did you use to build the world?  Just wondering, because
opt levels above -O have been troublesome.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Jan 28 16:32:20 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from clmboh1-smtp3.columbus.rr.com (unknown [65.24.0.112])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C078237B6A0
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 16:31:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.iowna.com (dhcp065-024-023-038.columbus.rr.com [65.24.23.38])
	by clmboh1-smtp3.columbus.rr.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f0T0Tar13160;
	Sun, 28 Jan 2001 19:29:36 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <3A74B928.52EB66FD@mail.iowna.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 19:28:24 -0500
From: Bill Moran <wmoran@mail.iowna.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE i386)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Donn Miller <dmmiller@cvzoom.net>
Cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: rpc.statd mem leak?
References: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0101281918001.452-100000@acs-24-154-31-153.zoominternet.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Donn Miller wrote:
> 
> On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Bill Moran wrote:
> 
> > I seem to be "memory leak guy" this month ...
> >
> > Is it normal for rpc.statd to soak up 257M (as reported by top in the
> > size column)? The "res" column shows 542K.
> 
> What CFLAGS did you use to build the world?  Just wondering, because
> opt levels above -O have been troublesome.

Whatever the default. I didn't tweak anything (other than the kernel
config file) before making world.

-Bill


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Jan 28 16:44:12 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from bazooka.unixfreak.org (bazooka.unixfreak.org [63.198.170.138])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24F6637B698
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 16:43:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: by bazooka.unixfreak.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id E0C203E02; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 16:43:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unixfreak.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by bazooka.unixfreak.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id DA0923C10B; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 16:43:51 -0800 (PST)
To: Bill Moran <wmoran@mail.iowna.com>
Cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: rpc.statd mem leak? 
In-Reply-To: Message from Bill Moran <wmoran@mail.iowna.com> 
   of "Sun, 28 Jan 2001 18:49:55 EST." <3A74B023.1E2D4D4A@mail.iowna.com> 
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 16:43:46 -0800
From: Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org>
Message-Id: <20010129004351.E0C203E02@bazooka.unixfreak.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> Is it normal for rpc.statd to soak up 257M (as reported by top in the
> size column)? [...]

Yes.  It's not actually using this memory; it just mapped 257 Mbytes
of memory into its address space so it wouldn't have to worry about
expanding its allocations if/when it comes under high load.  This
makes some sense for heavily-loaded NFS servers, but it doesn't hurt
anything on the lightly-loaded ones, so I wouldn't worry about it.

					Dima Dorfman
					dima@unixfreak.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Jan 28 16:46: 1 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from giroc.albury.net.au (giroc.albury.NET.AU [203.15.244.13])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 625B637B400
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 16:45:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from nicks@localhost)
	by giroc.albury.net.au (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f0T0jSI32262;
	Mon, 29 Jan 2001 11:45:28 +1100 (EST)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 11:45:28 +1100
From: Nick Slager <nicks@albury.net.au>
To: Bill Moran <wmoran@mail.iowna.com>
Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: rpc.statd mem leak?
Message-ID: <20010129114528.A21749@albury.net.au>
References: <3A74B023.1E2D4D4A@mail.iowna.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <3A74B023.1E2D4D4A@mail.iowna.com>; from wmoran@mail.iowna.com on Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 06:49:55PM -0500
X-Homer: Whoohooooooo!
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Thus spake Bill Moran (wmoran@mail.iowna.com):

> I seem to be "memory leak guy" this month ...
> 
> Is it normal for rpc.statd to soak up 257M (as reported by top in the
> size column)? The "res" column shows 542K.
> The machine seems to be functioning just fine otherwise. It just seems a
> little unusual.
> It's a 4.2-STABLE (Jan 8) machine and it's servicing 2 NFS connections
> as well as running samba and netatalk. Not much else going on other than
> Vinum mirrored drives and nightly backups using dump.

Search the mail archives; basically it's reserving a heap of VM space
but not actually using it. It's not harmful.


Nick

-- 
 From a Sun Microsystems bug report (#4102680):
  "Workaround: don't pound on the mouse like a wild monkey."



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Jan 28 18: 0:27 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from panzer.kdm.org (panzer.kdm.org [216.160.178.169])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F07737B400
	for <stable@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 18:00:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from ken@localhost)
	by panzer.kdm.org (8.9.3/8.9.1) id TAA07011
	for stable@FreeBSD.org; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 19:00:08 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from ken)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 19:00:08 -0700
From: "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@kdm.org>
To: stable@FreeBSD.org
Subject: cd(4) driver MFCs
Message-ID: <20010128190008.A6951@panzer.kdm.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


I have just merged a couple of cd(4) driver changes into RELENG_4.

The first is writeable CD support.  Note that this is only for randomly
writeable devices that probe as CDROM drives, like DVD-RAM and PD devices.
CD-R, CD-RW, WORM, and other sequentially writeable media is still handled
by cdrecord.

The second is a change to disable setting the load/eject bit in
cdstartunit().  This causes problems with caddy-type drives.

Let me know if anyone runs into problems with either change.

Ken
-- 
Kenneth Merry
ken@kdm.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Jan 28 19:53:21 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mailhost01.reflexnet.net (mailhost01.reflexnet.net [64.6.192.82])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71B7437B400
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 19:53:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com ([216.196.73.168]) by mailhost01.reflexnet.net  with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.197.19);
	 Sun, 28 Jan 2001 19:50:57 -0800
Received: (from cjc@localhost)
	by rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f0T3qxw92781;
	Sun, 28 Jan 2001 19:52:59 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from cjc)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 19:52:58 -0800
From: "Crist J. Clark" <cjclark@reflexnet.net>
To: Kal Torak <kaltorak@quake.com.au>
Cc: FreeBSD-stable <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: ipfw forwarding (more info)
Message-ID: <20010128195258.B91447@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex>
Reply-To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu
References: <3A72CB47.7A5DD83@quake.com.au> <20010127220257.B28504@nevermind.kiev.ua> <3A732BE9.F559820D@quake.com.au> <3A732EFB.E7E743BA@quake.com.au> <20010127170621.M10761@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex> <3A7411CF.816DA573@quake.com.au> <20010128132028.W10761@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex> <3A74AA27.9E30C7C2@quake.com.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i
In-Reply-To: <3A74AA27.9E30C7C2@quake.com.au>; from kaltorak@quake.com.au on Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 10:24:23AM +1100
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 10:24:23AM +1100, Kal Torak wrote:
> > > Yeah using the redirect_port option in natd works, but I dont understand
> > > why it doesnt work with ipfw... I thought natd might be stopping, but even
> > > having the fwd rule before the divert to natd rule doesnt change anything..
> > > Dose ipfw fwd even work to remote machines?
> > 
> > Yes, it works. No, it does not work how you want it to. The 'fwd'
> > directive does exactly what it says, it forwards a packet to some
> > location. What it does NOT do is change the packet in any way. That
> > is, when you forward a packet to another machine, the packet arrives
> > at the next machine (or next hop on the way there) with the
> > destination IP address unchanged from the original packet. I doubt the
> > machine you are sending this to does anything with a packet not
> > addressed to it.
> 
> Ahhh, now I see... And since the packet was addressed to the machine that
> was forwarding it, it never actually went anywhere...

No, it will still be forwarded (it will pe passed at layer 2) to the
next hop machine... But what that box does with it (what you want it
to or something else), I can't say.

> I had thought the fwd rule changed the destination address on the packet
> not just the next hop address...

Nope it does not touch the destination address. Read ipfw(8) very,
very carefully again.

Could you do me a favor? I've gotten tired of answering this one so I
wrote a FAQ entry. If you had ben pointed to the following FAQ item,

  http://www.unixfreak.org/~dima/home/freebsd/data/FAQ/networking.html#IPFW-FWD

Would that have straightened you out? Any suggestions for it?
-- 
Crist J. Clark                           cjclark@alum.mit.edu


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Jan 28 20: 8:20 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from chmls05.mediaone.net (chmls05.mediaone.net [24.147.1.143])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A9CB37B400
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 20:08:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from toddpc (medoonga@h0000e85749b9.ne.mediaone.net [24.91.211.34])
	by chmls05.mediaone.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f0T481S14745
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 23:08:01 -0500 (EST)
From: "Todd Punderson" <tpunder@mediaone.net>
To: <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: 
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 23:09:01 -0500
Message-ID: <JIEJLABGDBIKKAPILNDGKEGNCBAA.tpunder@mediaone.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

subscribe


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Jan 28 20: 9:13 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from saturn.home.ben.com (c1058885-a.bvrtn1.or.home.com [24.12.186.106])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F05A137B698
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 20:08:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from bjj@localhost)
	by saturn.home.ben.com (8.11.1/8.9.3) id f0T48o733807
	for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 20:08:50 -0800 (PST)
From: Ben Jackson <ben@ben.com>
Message-Id: <200101290408.f0T48o733807@saturn.home.ben.com>
Subject: can a threaded process ever use multiple CPUs?
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 20:08:50 -0800 (PST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL68 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

As far as I can tell the pthreads interface can never use more than one
CPU.  Is there another threading mechanism supported by -STABLE that can?

--Ben


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Jan 28 20:18:29 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mail2.uniserve.com (mail2.uniserve.com [204.244.156.10])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E85FC37B400
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 20:18:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shell.uniserve.ca ([204.244.186.218])
	by mail2.uniserve.com with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1)
	id 14N5lX-0002sA-00; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 20:18:08 -0800
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 20:18:02 -0800 (PST)
From: Tom <tom@uniserve.com>
X-Sender: tom@shell.uniserve.ca
To: Ben Jackson <ben@ben.com>
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: can a threaded process ever use multiple CPUs?
In-Reply-To: <200101290408.f0T48o733807@saturn.home.ben.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.10101282017090.29227-100000@shell.uniserve.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Sun, 28 Jan 2001, Ben Jackson wrote:

> As far as I can tell the pthreads interface can never use more than one
> CPU.  Is there another threading mechanism supported by -STABLE that can?
> 
> --Ben

  /usr/ports/devel/linuxthreads

Tom



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Jan 28 20:22:26 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from hnet04.kellyhendrix.com (unknown [208.233.247.37])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CCB037B400
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 20:22:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: by hnet04.kellyhendrix.com (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id ED47618C8B; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 23:22:12 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 23:22:12 -0500
From: Kelly Hendrix <kelly@compuage.com>
To: "Paul A. Howes" <pahowes@fair-ware.com>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Double Man Pages...
Message-ID: <20010128232212.A8778@hnet04.kellyhendrix.com>
Reply-To: Kelly Hendrix <kelly@compuage.com>
References: <BCEFKOJHNDEAJONMKMHEKEHCCHAA.pahowes@fair-ware.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <BCEFKOJHNDEAJONMKMHEKEHCCHAA.pahowes@fair-ware.com>; from pahowes@fair-ware.com on Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 12:40:32PM -0500
X-Freebsd-Version: FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE i386
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Greetings

Yes, I have seen this problem, but I can't remember whether it was on
the console, in X or both.  At the time, I was also having problems
using the arrows keys in console editors (vim, vi and ee).  I tracked 
it down to this entry in my .cshrc:  setenv TERM=xterm-color.  I don't
know what your circumstances are, whether you're having this problem on
the console or in X, but make sure your TERM variable is set to a
suitable type (cons25 I believe is the default).  If you're using a
window manager, from experience I can tell you that KDE2's terminal
programs are the pits and tend to cause a lot of problems.  Try using
XFree86's xterm and see if that helps.  X's xterm also works out of the
box with color.

Kelly
On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 12:40:32PM -0500, Paul A. Howes wrote:
> All-
> 
> When I install a machine with a fresh 4.2-RELEASE distro, the "man" command
> works as expected.  When I use cvsup to bring the machine up to 4.2-STABLE
> for the first time, man shows every manual page twice.  By that, I mean, the
> manual page displays normally, and instead of exiting back to a command line
> prompt, the whole thing is displayed again, requiring me to either page
> through it, or hit "q" to exit.  The "info" command has the same behavior:
> The manual page is in the buffer twice, in its entirety.
> 
> Is this a problem others have seen?  Or do I just have something screwy in
> my configuration?
> 
> --
> Paul A. Howes
> pahowes@fair-ware.com
> 
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

-- 
 ______________________________________________________________________
| There are two ways to live your life.  One is as though nothing is a |
| miracle.  The other is as though everything is a miracle.            |
|                                                                      |
|	Albert Einstein (1879-1955)                                    |
|______________________________________________________________________|


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Jan 28 20:33:57 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from easynet-gw.netvalue.fr (unknown [212.180.121.161])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 260CD37B698
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 20:33:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.netvalue.fr (unknown [192.168.1.13])
	by easynet-gw.netvalue.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E9758C29
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 05:35:44 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-hk.netvalue.fr ([192.168.100.13]) by mail.netvalue.fr
          (Netscape Messaging Server 3.6)  with ESMTP id AAA3123
          for <stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 05:33:30 +0100
Received: from erwan.netvalue.fr ([192.168.100.100]) by
          mail-hk.netvalue.fr (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP
          id G7WPZB00.8FL; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 12:33:11 +0800 
Received: from netvalue.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by erwan.netvalue.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 64CDF18D7; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 12:33:33 +0800 (HKT)
Message-ID: <3A74F29D.1C68CF8F@netvalue.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 12:33:33 +0800
From: Erwan Arzur <erwan@netvalue.com>
Organization: NetValue Ltd.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386)
X-Accept-Language: en, fr-FR
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jo=E3o?= Fernandes <OpsyDopsy@netcabo.pt>
Cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: IPF vs ipfw?
References: <01012808071600.15005@OpsyDopsy.net.dhis.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Joćo Fernandes wrote:
> 
> Could some one please enlighten me on the subject IPFilter Versus ipfw?
> What the pros and cons may be?
> Or if this topic has already been way discussed, could I be given an URL to
> go and read the discussions?
> 
> Thanks in advance.
> 
> Joao Fernandes
> 

Information about ipfilter on its home page :
http://coombs.anu.edu.au/ipfilter/

My impression on ipfilter is that it is well and very actively
maintained by its author, and is a very comprehensive package ... just
as an example, the latest ECE flag advisory about ipfw came out when
this new flag has been handled by ipfilter for a long time. Both of them
are well documented (both the FreeBSD security howto and ipf howto are a
must-read), when ipfilter needs more hard work to understand every
aspects of it (which is good if you plan to be serious about your
security) ...

I've been using it for one year now, switching from ipfw because of its
dynamic rules (keep state) feature which was not available in ipfw at
this time. Now, it's exteremely difficult to give some pros and cons on
any such sensible package without starting a flamewar :-)

More discussion about this topic can be found on the
security@freebsd.org archives, on www.freebsd.org.
--
Erwan Arzur
NetValue ltd.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Jan 28 21:31:27 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au (pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au [202.14.186.30])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D351837B402
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 21:31:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from smap@localhost)
	by pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f0T5V8g34594
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 16:31:08 +1100 (EST)
	(envelope-from carl@xena.ipaustralia.gov.au)
Received: from newton.aipo.gov.au(10.0.100.18) by pericles.IPAustralia.gov.au via smap (V2.0)
	id xma034572; Mon, 29 Jan 01 16:30:51 +1100
Received: from localhost (carl@localhost)
	by newton.aipo.gov.au (8.11.1/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f0T5UoU78864
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 16:30:51 +1100 (EST)
	(envelope-from carl@xena.ipaustralia.gov.au)
X-Authentication-Warning: newton.aipo.gov.au: carl owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 16:30:50 +1100 (EST)
From: Carl Makin <carl@xena.ipaustralia.gov.au>
X-Sender: carl@newton.aipo.gov.au
To: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: ibcs2 emulation funnies.
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101291626431.77744-100000@newton.aipo.gov.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


Afternoon all...

If you type in "ibcs2" at the shell prompt it loads up both

ibcs2.ko and
ibcs2_coff.ko

however if you specify "ibcs2_enable="YES" then it only loads
ibcs2.ko.  To get the coff module loaded you have to specify
"ibcs2_loaders="coff".

Is ibcs2 of any use without the "coff" loader?  Why isn't it loaded by
default any more?

(FYI I've packaged up the ADSM SCO client for running under FreeBSD and
this was biting me during the install)


Carl.




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Jan 28 21:46:44 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.geektech.com (geektech.com [206.132.234.147])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C82FE37B400
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 21:46:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from prime.vsservices.com ([209.34.3.212])
        by mail.geektech.com (MERAK 2.10.360) with ESMTP id CNB36688
        for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sun, 28 Jan 2001 23:47:44 -0600
From: GB Clark II <gclarkii@geektech.com>
To: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: SVR4 wierdness as of 24JAN
Date: Sun, 28 Jan 2001 23:43:05 -0600
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.0.28]
Content-Type: text/plain
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01012823470601.03086@prime.vsservices.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hello,

I've got a 4.2STABLE system as of 24JAN2001.

I get the following message during boot up:
link_elf: symbol svr4_stream_get undefined

So of course the svr4 module does not load.
Everything else is working correct.

Does anyone have any ideas before I go 
digging in the code?

Thanks,
GB

--
GB Clark II            | Roaming FreeBSD Admin
gclarkii@GeekTech.COM  | General Geek 
           CTHULU for President - Why choose the lesser of two evils?


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29  0:24:57 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from saturn.home.ben.com (c1058885-a.bvrtn1.or.home.com [24.12.186.106])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3664337B402
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 00:24:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from saturn.home.ben.com (bjj@localhost)
	by saturn.home.ben.com (8.11.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f0T8Obq37564
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 00:24:37 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200101290824.f0T8Obq37564@saturn.home.ben.com>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: mozilla able to permanently leak shm
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 00:24:31 -0800
From: Ben Jackson <ben@ben.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

If I start mozilla (build id 2001010517) once it makes 6 shared memory
segments.  If it exits cleanly it removes them.  If it coredumps or I
have to kill it the segments are left around, and ipcrm won't delete
them:

$ ipcs -m
Shared Memory:
T     ID     KEY        MODE       OWNER    GROUP
m 458752          0 --rwarwarwa      bjj    admin
m  65537          0 --rwarwarwa      bjj    admin
m  65538          0 --rwarwarwa      bjj    admin
m  65539          0 --rwarwarwa      bjj    admin
m  65540          0 --rwarwarwa      bjj    admin
m  65541          0 --rwarwarwa      bjj    admin

$ ipcrm -m 458752
ipcrm: shmid(458752): : Invalid argument

I didn't notice this until just now, when I had to reboot becuase my
machine was totally out of segments.

FreeBSD pulsar.home.ben.com 4.2-STABLE FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE #2: Tue Dec 26 20:17:22 PST 2000     bjj@pulsar.home.ben.com:/a/src/sys/compile/PULSAR  i386

--Ben


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29  0:30:15 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from cs.huji.ac.il (cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.10])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3987537B402; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 00:29:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sexta.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.16.13] ident=danny)
	by cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 14N95Z-0004Zw-00; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 09:51:01 +0200
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-0.24
To: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>, paul@mu.org (Paul Saab),
	freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org, hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Really odd "BTX halted" problem booting - PXE/diskless
In-reply-to: Your message of Fri, 27 Oct 2000 19:02:03 -0700 (PDT) .
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 09:51:01 +0200
From: Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il>
Message-Id: <E14N95Z-0004Zw-00@cs.huji.ac.il>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

im now being bitten by this one, but with a twist:
 on a compaq deskpro workstation it's ok
 on a dell-precision 420, it bombs.
both bioses are configured to boot via the network/pxe.

im using the same disks for both boxes.

i labeled the disks with:
 dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/rda0 bs=1k count=1
 disklabel -Brw da0 auto

i then went ahead an played with vinum, all went fine on the Compaq,
i then wanted to do some comparisons, so i hooked up the disks to the Dell
and now BTX bombs. 

is there a way, that when booting from the net, btx ignores the mbr/fdisk info?

danny
ps: im looking into the btx stuff, but will take me some time to remeber 
assembler :-)

In message <XFMail.001027190203.jhb@FreeBSD.org>you write:
}
}On 28-Oct-00 Matt Dillon wrote:
}>:>       # optional dd if you are paranoid
}>:>       # dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/da0 bs=32k count=4
}>:>       fdisk -I da0
}>:>       disklabel -w -r da0s1 auto
}>:> 
}>:>     That's much preferable to having to use sysinstall if all you want to
}>:>     do is initialize a label on a slice.
}>:
}>:Yes, this is definitely the desired behavior.
}>:
}>:-- 
}>:
}>:John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
}> 
}>     John, can you explain how the MBR bootstraps a slice?  Should I make
}>     disklabel zero-out the fdisk partition table area in the slice rather
}>     then installing the dummy fdisk partition table?  That is, for the
}>     case where -B is used on a slice (da0s1) verses on the whole-disk (da0)?
}
}Just ignore the slice table within a slice.  It is only used when boot1
}is splatted over top of the MBR for the dangerously dedicated mode.  It is
}unused and ignored otherwise.
}
}>                                               -Matt
}
}-- 
}
}John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
}PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc
}"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!"  -  http://www.FreeBSD.org/






To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29  2:45:43 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from dilbert.fcg.co.uk (dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk [194.203.69.166])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D2F037B404
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 02:45:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pfrench by dilbert.fcg.co.uk with local (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 14NBnu-0002ii-00; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 10:44:58 +0000
To: kaltorak@quake.com.au
Subject: Re: anybody seen this one ?
Cc: simond@irrelevant.org, stable@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <3A7271EB.360D9954@quake.com.au>
Message-Id: <E14NBnu-0002ii-00@dilbert.fcg.co.uk>
From: Pete French <pfrench@firstcallgroup.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 10:44:58 +0000
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> If the new bios doesnt work you may need to make/get a custom install
> kernel...

New BIOS didnt work. Hmm. Interestingly I took the motherboard out
of the case on my desk (known to work) and put it into the tower on
the floor. It now exhibits the same problem !

I'm going to give up on this now and see if I can get my 3.5 kernel
back up and running.

-pete.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29  3:52:28 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.merrion.nua.net (mail.merrion.nua.net [195.7.46.14])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90EC037B400
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 03:52:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from thoth (cerberus.merrion.nua.net [195.7.46.125])
	by mail.merrion.nua.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id f0TBmgo23698;
	Mon, 29 Jan 2001 11:48:42 GMT
From: Tony Byrne <tony@nua.ie>
To: Andrew J Caines <A.J.Caines@altavista.net>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: syslogd throwing a hissy fit
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 11:56:28 +0000
Organization: Nua Ltd.
Message-ID: <fhma7t85idv8o45c6u8jhj9je1qv1jk2fv@4ax.com>
References: <20010121021039.A442@hal9000.bsdonline.org> <7q9u6t0tkj5ktplad6k8468koar3j8jvi9@4ax.com> <s7hu6torq3c79usoqpgig3b56gg9d5n6jr@4ax.com> <20010124223705.A92362@gosset.maths.tcd.ie> <5qou6tkiba9jk6nbjepe9hn2g45hq560ep@4ax.com> <20010121021039.A442@hal9000.bsdonline.org> <7q9u6t0tkj5ktplad6k8468koar3j8jvi9@4ax.com> <s7hu6torq3c79usoqpgig3b56gg9d5n6jr@4ax.com> <20010124223705.A92362@gosset.maths.tcd.ie> <20010128162429.A412@hal9000.bsdonline.org>
In-Reply-To: <20010128162429.A412@hal9000.bsdonline.org>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Andrew,

I've submitted a bug report.  I don't have the tracking number to hand
now, but I can send it to you later.

Regards,

Tony.

On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 16:24:29 -0500, you wrote:

>Folks,
>
>Thanks to David Malone and Tony Byrne for their responses concerning =
this
>most most unusual syslogd behaviour.
>
>After the last cvsup on Thursday night, build and install there is no
>change in the fit that syslogd throws when started. This is no surprise,
>since there is nothing clearly related to syslog in the last update.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29  3:56:30 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.merrion.nua.net (mail.merrion.nua.net [195.7.46.14])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B187637B400
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 03:56:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from thoth (cerberus.merrion.nua.net [195.7.46.125])
	by mail.merrion.nua.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id f0TBqxo23891;
	Mon, 29 Jan 2001 11:52:59 GMT
From: Tony Byrne <tony@nua.ie>
To: Andrew J Caines <A.J.Caines@altavista.net>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: syslogd throwing a hissy fit
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 12:00:45 +0000
Organization: Nua Ltd.
Message-ID: <alma7t4noj9u417v4t026fuuffkoflhf75@4ax.com>
References: <20010121021039.A442@hal9000.bsdonline.org> <7q9u6t0tkj5ktplad6k8468koar3j8jvi9@4ax.com> <s7hu6torq3c79usoqpgig3b56gg9d5n6jr@4ax.com> <20010124223705.A92362@gosset.maths.tcd.ie> <5qou6tkiba9jk6nbjepe9hn2g45hq560ep@4ax.com> <20010121021039.A442@hal9000.bsdonline.org> <7q9u6t0tkj5ktplad6k8468koar3j8jvi9@4ax.com> <s7hu6torq3c79usoqpgig3b56gg9d5n6jr@4ax.com> <20010124223705.A92362@gosset.maths.tcd.ie> <20010128162429.A412@hal9000.bsdonline.org>
In-Reply-To: <20010128162429.A412@hal9000.bsdonline.org>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Sun, 28 Jan 2001 16:24:29 -0500, you wrote:

>Assistance and recommendations are most welcome, as I am unhappy running
>without syslogd and am at a loss to address the problem.

Andrew,

Your syslog.conf file contains the following line:

*.info;kern.debug;cron.notice;mail.crit;local2.none	/dev/console

Remove '*.info;' from the beginning of the entry and restart syslogd.
This should avoid the trigger for this particular problem.

Regards,

Tony.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29  4:20:56 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from gw2.dnepr.net (CoreGW2-TBone.dnepr.net [195.24.156.97])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2857E37B402
	for <stable@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 04:20:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dnepr.net (dnepr.net [195.24.156.98]) by gw2.dnepr.net (8.8.8/8.6.18/01) with ESMTP id OAA06200 for <stable@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 14:20:11 +0200 (EET)
Received: (from land@localhost)
	by dnepr.net (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA12202
	for stable@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 14:20:00 +0200 (EET)
X-POP3-RCPT: stable@FreeBSD.org
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 14:19:59 +0200
From: Andrey Lakhno <land@dnepr.net>
To: stable@FreeBSD.org
Subject: /root permissions after installworld
Message-ID: <20010129141958.A11935@dnepr.net>
Mail-Followup-To: stable@FreeBSD.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hi !

Why after each installworld permissions of /root directory changes to 755 ?
Before installworld it was 700.

FreeBSD 4.x-STABLE.

-- 
Best regards,
 Andrey


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29  4:35:59 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from shrewd.knigma.org (shrewd.demon.co.uk [212.229.151.45])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B86C537B402
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 04:35:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lap.knigma.org (localhost.knigma.org [127.0.0.1])
	by shrewd.knigma.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f0TCZVl09470
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 12:35:31 GMT
	(envelope-from markk@knigma.org)
Message-ID: <kkJYj0AFLWd6Ew+t@knigma.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 12:32:05 +0000
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
From: Mark Knight <markk@knigma.org>
Subject: Re: Sound on Intel Easton
References: <MBECJOBNOFOBALDMPGEBOEELEEAA.tonyr@clarotech.co.za>
 <03ac01c08639$f2982910$1004020a@darkstar>
In-Reply-To: <03ac01c08639$f2982910$1004020a@darkstar>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Turnpike Integrated Version 5.01 U <CD5ord0Toj+fcwWapqQVhoKJI$>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In article <03ac01c08639$f2982910$1004020a@darkstar>, Cameron Grant
<gandalf@vilnya.demon.co.uk> writes
>> Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated
>
>not yet supported.
>
Odd. I have a D815EEA motherboard with 4.2-STABLE from 16th Jan. I have
'device pcm' in my kernel config. dmesg reports:

 pcm0: <AudioPCI ES1371> port 0xde80-0xdebf irq 10 at device 7.0 on pci1

It seems to work just fine playing mp3's.
-- 
Mark A. R. Knight
Tel: +44 7973 410732                              http://www.knigma.org/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29  5: 3:43 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from freenix.no (atreides.freenix.no [213.188.21.6])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C0537B402
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 05:03:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from morten@localhost)
	by freenix.no (8.11.1/8.9.3) id f0TD3Is41328
	for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 14:03:18 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from morten)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 14:03:18 +0100
From: "Morten A . Middelthon" <morten@freenix.no>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: ntp problems in 4.2-STABLE
Message-ID: <20010129140318.A40159@freenix.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE
X-Warning: So cunning you could brush your teeth with it.
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


I've been using ntpd for a long time now without problems, but with my
4.2-STABLE boxes it doesn't work anymore. An example:

# ntpdate ep
29 Jan 13:59:25 ntpdate[30448]: no server suitable for synchronization found

The host 'ep' is running ntpd, and the /etc/ntp.conf looks like this (and has
been looking like this for ages):

server server.im.using.for.ntpd
logfile /var/log/ntpd.log
pidfile /var/run/ntpd.pid
driftfile /var/log/ntp.drift

If I try running ntpdate towards a box with ntpd under 4.0-STABLE, I have no
problems:

# ntpdate other.server.which.works
29 Jan 13:52:06 ntpdate[75861]: step time server 192.168.0.1 offset -0.769745 sec

ntp.conf on the 4.0-STABLE box looks more or less exactly the same.

-- 
Morten A. Middelthon
Freenix Norge
http://www.freenix.no/
--
To err is human, to forgive is Not Company Policy.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29  5: 5:18 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mailgate.abacus.co.uk (mailgate.abacus.co.uk [194.130.48.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09A9F37B402
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 05:05:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from abacus.co.uk (pcantony.bl.abacus.co.uk [194.130.48.111])
	by mailgate.abacus.co.uk (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA20098
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 13:02:31 GMT
Message-ID: <3A756A33.E1089768@abacus.co.uk>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 13:03:47 +0000
From: Antony T Curtis <antony@abacus.co.uk>
Organization: Abacus Polar PLC (UK)
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE i386)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: ipnat vs natd and ipf vs ipfw (fwd)
References: <4.2.2.20010127225302.01e75660@marble.sentex.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Mike Tancsa wrote:
> 
> At 07:20 PM 1/27/2001 -0500, Espen Oyslebo wrote:
> >Currently, I have ipfw and natd doing their job fairly well. Is there any
> >point in switching (yeah,yeah, don't fix it if it ain't broken).
> 
> Actually, I have found ipnat to be *much* faster for my home DSL
> connection.  My gateway is a lowly Pentium 133 and I can only get full rate
> net throughput use ipnat. natd is about 33% slower than ipnat for my setup
> on PPPoE.

AFAIK, natd is a userland implementation whereas ipnat exists in kernel
space

This gives ipnat the advantage that packets don't have to cross between
kernel and user space.

However, natd really needs to be extended to support desirable features
such as a NAT address pool - even if it only supports one pool, it'd be
adequate because multiple instances of natd may be run.

-- 
ANTONY T CURTIS                     Tel: +44 (1635) 36222
Abacus Polar Holdings Ltd           Fax: +44 (1635) 38670
> 
All true wisdom is found on T-shirts.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29  5: 5:29 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.ZSEA.zp.ua (ZSEA.zp.ua [212.8.40.5])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBB3737B404
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 05:05:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from laa@localhost)
	by mx1.ZSEA.zp.ua (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f0TD4iC05406;
	Mon, 29 Jan 2001 15:04:44 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from laa@laa.zp.ua)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 15:04:43 +0200
From: "Alexandr A. Listopad" <laa@laa.zp.ua>
To: Andrey Lakhno <land@dnepr.net>
Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: /root permissions after installworld
Message-ID: <20010129150443.A5218@laa.zp.ua>
References: <20010129141958.A11935@dnepr.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20010129141958.A11935@dnepr.net>; from land@dnepr.net on Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 02:19:59PM +0200
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 02:19:59PM +0200, Andrey Lakhno wrote:
> Hi !
> 
> Why after each installworld permissions of /root directory changes to 755 ?
> Before installworld it was 700.
> 
> FreeBSD 4.x-STABLE.

see src/etc/mtree/BSD.root.dist

-- 
 Laa


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29  5:13:22 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.gmd.de (mail.gmd.de [129.26.8.90])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57A7837B400
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 05:13:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from orgwis.gmd.de (paulsen@cscwmail [129.26.160.35])
	by mail.gmd.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA22965;
	Mon, 29 Jan 2001 14:12:53 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from paulsen@localhost)
	by orgwis.gmd.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA05167;
	Mon, 29 Jan 2001 14:12:51 +0100 (MET)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 14:12:51 +0100
From: Volker Paulsen <paulsen@gmd.de>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au
Subject: Re: IPFILTER 3.4.16 and FreeBSD-4.2
Message-ID: <20010129141251.A4937@cscwmail.gmd.de>
Mail-Followup-To: Volker Paulsen <paulsen@gmd.de>,
	freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au
References: <3A72DEA1.A31EC401@webcraft99.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <3A72DEA1.A31EC401@webcraft99.com>; from afu@webcraft99.com on Sat, Jan 27, 2001 at 10:43:45PM +0800
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hi,

btw. broken, this reminds me to this bug I wanted to mention (FYI):

kldunload of the ipf kernel module (3.4.16) on FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE
(20010117) freezes the machine and causes a reboot:

...
Jan 29 14:06:03 ns /kernel: IP Filter: v3.4.16 unloaded
Jan 29 14:08:29 ns /kernel: Copyright (c) 1992-2001 The FreeBSD Project.
...

Regards,
Volker Paulsen
-- 
  OrbiTeam Software GmbH                     http://www.orbiteam.de/
  Rathausalle 10                             phone: +49 2241 14-3704
  D-53757 Sankt Augustin                     fax:   +49 2241 14-3701


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29  5:40:26 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from aifhs8.alcatel.fr (aifhs8.alcatel.fr [212.208.74.153])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1D3037B404
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 05:40:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frmta003.netfr.alcatel.fr (frmta003.netfr.alcatel.fr [155.132.251.32])
        by aifhs8.alcatel.fr (ALCANET/SMTP2) with SMTP id OAA10044;
        Mon, 29 Jan 2001 14:39:46 +0100 (MET)
Received: by frmta003.netfr.alcatel.fr(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.7  (934.1 12-30-1999))  id C12569E3.004B05F7 ; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 14:39:27 +0100
X-Lotus-FromDomain: ALCATEL
From: Thierry.Herbelot@alcatel.fr
To: "Morten A . Middelthon" <morten@freenix.no>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Message-ID: <C12569E3.004B03DC.00@frmta003.netfr.alcatel.fr>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 14:39:18 +0100
Subject: Re: ntp problems in 4.2-STABLE
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG



Hello,

you may want to add "cheat codes" to your reference server's ntp.conf, such as :
# NTP server Configuration
server 127.127.1.0 minpoll 4
fudge 127.127.1.0 stratum 0

(this tells the server's ntpd to prentend it is really a "stratum 0" server)

this runs on my 4.2-R ntp server and is used by the other 4.2-R ntp clients

     TfH




"Morten A . Middelthon" <morten@freenix.no> on 29/01/2001 14:03:18
                                                              
                                                              
                                                              
 To:      freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG                          
                                                              
 cc:      (bcc: Thierry HERBELOT/FR/ALCATEL)                  
                                                              
                                                              
                                                              
 Subject: ntp problems in 4.2-STABLE                          
                                                              






I've been using ntpd for a long time now without problems, but with my
4.2-STABLE boxes it doesn't work anymore. An example:

# ntpdate ep
29 Jan 13:59:25 ntpdate[30448]: no server suitable for synchronization found

The host 'ep' is running ntpd, and the /etc/ntp.conf looks like this (and has
been looking like this for ages):

server server.im.using.for.ntpd
logfile /var/log/ntpd.log
pidfile /var/run/ntpd.pid
driftfile /var/log/ntp.drift

If I try running ntpdate towards a box with ntpd under 4.0-STABLE, I have no
problems:

# ntpdate other.server.which.works
29 Jan 13:52:06 ntpdate[75861]: step time server 192.168.0.1 offset -0.769745 sec

ntp.conf on the 4.0-STABLE box looks more or less exactly the same.

--
Morten A. Middelthon
Freenix Norge
http://www.freenix.no/
--
To err is human, to forgive is Not Company Policy.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29  7: 1:10 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F1DE337B69F
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 07:00:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from walton.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP
          id <aa50495@salmon>; 29 Jan 2001 15:00:51 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 15:00:51 +0000
From: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie>
To: Thierry.Herbelot@alcatel.fr
Cc: "Morten A . Middelthon" <morten@freenix.no>,
	freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: ntp problems in 4.2-STABLE
Message-ID: <20010129150051.A33984@walton.maths.tcd.ie>
References: <C12569E3.004B03DC.00@frmta003.netfr.alcatel.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <C12569E3.004B03DC.00@frmta003.netfr.alcatel.fr>; from Thierry.Herbelot@alcatel.fr on Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 02:39:18PM +0100
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 02:39:18PM +0100, Thierry.Herbelot@alcatel.fr wrote:

> you may want to add "cheat codes" to your reference server's ntp.conf, such as :
> # NTP server Configuration
> server 127.127.1.0 minpoll 4
> fudge 127.127.1.0 stratum 0

Fudging to stratum 0 is almost always a bad idea. Fudgint to stratum
12 or 13 is a much better idea 'cos then the damage caused by
leaking bad time to the internet is much smaller. We fudge to
stratum 14 and it works fine.

	David.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29  7: 4:37 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from aifhs8.alcatel.fr (aifhs8.alcatel.fr [212.208.74.153])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C3F837B69F
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 07:04:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from frmta003.netfr.alcatel.fr (frmta003.netfr.alcatel.fr [155.132.251.32])
        by aifhs8.alcatel.fr (ALCANET/SMTP2) with SMTP id QAA19586
        for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 16:04:20 +0100 (MET)
Received: by frmta003.netfr.alcatel.fr(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.7  (934.1 12-30-1999))  id C12569E3.0052C6B5 ; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 16:04:08 +0100
X-Lotus-FromDomain: ALCATEL
From: Thierry.Herbelot@alcatel.fr
To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Message-ID: <C12569E3.0052C62E.00@frmta003.netfr.alcatel.fr>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 16:04:04 +0100
Subject: Re: ntp problems in 4.2-STABLE
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG



OK, this was a "quick'n dirty"(TM) hack to get everything running
(I'll try with a lesser stratum)

anyway, this on a "very" private internal network

     TfH




David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie> on 29/01/2001 16:00:51
                                                              
                                                              
                                                              
 To:      Thierry HERBELOT/FR/ALCATEL@ALCATEL                 
                                                              
 cc:      "Morten A . Middelthon" <morten@freenix.no>,        
          freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG                          
                                                              
                                                              
                                                              
 Subject: Re: ntp problems in 4.2-STABLE                      
                                                              





On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 02:39:18PM +0100, Thierry.Herbelot@alcatel.fr wrote:

> you may want to add "cheat codes" to your reference server's ntp.conf, such as :
> # NTP server Configuration
> server 127.127.1.0 minpoll 4
> fudge 127.127.1.0 stratum 0

Fudging to stratum 0 is almost always a bad idea. Fudgint to stratum
12 or 13 is a much better idea 'cos then the damage caused by
leaking bad time to the internet is much smaller. We fudge to
stratum 14 and it works fine.

     David.





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29  7:31:11 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from axis.tdd.lt (axis.tdd.lt [193.219.211.5])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C56937B6B9
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 07:30:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (midom@localhost)
	by axis.tdd.lt (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f0TFUgJ49791
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 17:30:43 +0200 (EET)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 17:30:42 +0200 (EET)
From: Domas Mituzas <domas.mituzas@delfi.lt>
X-Sender: midom@axis.tdd.lt
To: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: vn related kernel crash in -stable
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101291725070.48391-100000@axis.tdd.lt>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hi

if you try to attach file to a vn device with labels option, you get such
nice kernel crash (world/kernel made just half an hour ago):

Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
	fault virtual address	= 0x4
	fault code		= supervisor read, page not present
	instruction pointer	= 0x8:0xc012bdfh
	stack pointer		= 0x10:0xc8738a28
	frame pointer		= 0x10:0xc8738a28
	code segment		= base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b
				= DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1
	processor eflags	= interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL=0
	current process		= vnconfig
	interrupt mask		= none
	trap			= 12

That's all folks =)

Kernel config is quite normal.

Domas



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29  8:15:39 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mukappa.home.com (c576194-a.saltlk1.ut.home.com [24.20.97.5])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1246137B69B
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 08:15:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mukappa.home.com (jqdovs@localhost.home.com [127.0.0.1])
	by mukappa.home.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f0TGE1l27421;
	Mon, 29 Jan 2001 09:14:01 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from mupi@mknet.org)
From: Mike Porter <mupi@mknet.org>
Reply-To: mupi@mknet.org
To: Erwan Arzur <erwan@netvalue.com>,
	=?iso-8859-1?q?Jo=E3o=20Fernandes?= <OpsyDopsy@netcabo.pt>
Subject: Re: IPF vs ipfw?
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 09:14:01 -0700
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.99]
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG
References: <01012808071600.15005@OpsyDopsy.net.dhis.org> <3A74F29D.1C68CF8F@netvalue.com>
In-Reply-To: <3A74F29D.1C68CF8F@netvalue.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01012909140106.10681@mukappa.home.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Sunday 28 January 2001 21:33, Erwan Arzur wrote:
> Joćo Fernandes wrote:
> > Could some one please enlighten me on the subject IPFilter Versus ipfw?
> > What the pros and cons may be?
> > Or if this topic has already been way discussed, could I be given an URL
> > to go and read the discussions?
> >

> I've been using it for one year now, switching from ipfw because of its
> dynamic rules (keep state) feature which was not available in ipfw at
> this time. Now, it's exteremely difficult to give some pros and cons on
> any such sensible package without starting a flamewar :-)
>
not to mention that it has been discussed several times here on this list 
<(}:  

> More discussion about this topic can be found on the
> security@freebsd.org archives, on www.freebsd.org.

The freebsd-stable archives on www.freebsd.org 
(http://www.freebsd.org/search/search.html#mailinglists is a good place to go 
to search the archives for all the FreeBSD mailing lists at FreeBSD.org) also 
have discussion on this topic.

mike
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.3 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iEYEARECAAYFAjp1lskACgkQZ7GovTQbIm4ZNwCfRMR9EwnGz0YiyFYN+nsJP/Cl
oo4An2QvUyaFbflC/5PUrIASQRdhP34+
=OQYp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29  8:16:22 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from lucifer.ninth-circle.org (lucifer.bart.nl [194.158.168.74])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1946C37B69E
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 08:16:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from asmodai@localhost)
	by lucifer.ninth-circle.org (8.11.1/8.11.0) id f0TGFwB91211;
	Mon, 29 Jan 2001 17:15:58 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from asmodai)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 17:15:58 +0100
From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl>
To: James Raftery <jraftery@wrdp.com>
Cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: BIND 8.2.3 into RELENG_3?
Message-ID: <20010129171558.L88275@lucifer.bart.nl>
References: <007f01c08a0c$d6518040$340410ac@JRAFTERY>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <007f01c08a0c$d6518040$340410ac@JRAFTERY>; from jraftery@wrdp.com on Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 04:02:10PM -0000
Organisation: VIA Net.Works The Netherlands
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

[cc:'d to stable@freebsd.org in order to inform more people]

-On [20010129 17:05], James Raftery (jraftery@wrdp.com) wrote:
>I'm following up to your message about the MFC of BIND 8.2.3 into
>RELENG_4 at
>http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=1019395+0+/usr/local/www/db
>/text/2001/freebsd-stable/20010128.freebsd-stable

[importing of BIND 8.2.3 into 3-STABLE]

>There are a lot of people running BIND on RELENG_3 -- me, for instance
>:)

And me as well. :)

Yes, I will ASAP import/MFC BIND 8.2.3-REL to 4-STABLE and 3-STABLE
after my round of testing.  I am also cleaning up the named/named-xfer
building which is sort of a hack at the moment.

Aside from that, I hope to get some time to MFC a lot more fixes back
into RELENG_3/3-STABLE.  Too bad I don't have a 2.2-STABLE box,
otherwise I would probably MFC a lot as well. :)

-- 
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven          VIA Net.Works The Netherlands
BSD: Technical excellence at its best  Network- and systemadministrator
	  D78D D0AD 244D 1D12 C9CA  7152 035C 1138 546A B867
Misery loves company...


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29  8:56: 2 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from blandings.com (adsl-216-103-90-79.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [216.103.90.79])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD02E37B698
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 08:55:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from anand@localhost)
	by blandings.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f0TGtG931507
	for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 08:55:16 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from anand)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 08:55:16 -0800
From: Anand <anand@blandings.com>
To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: mozilla able to permanently leak shm
Message-ID: <20010129085516.A29247@Psmith.blandings.com>
Reply-To: anand@blandings.com
References: <200101290824.f0T8Obq37564@saturn.home.ben.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <200101290824.f0T8Obq37564@saturn.home.ben.com>; from ben@ben.com on Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 12:24:31AM -0800
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Ben Jackson quoth:
> If I start mozilla (build id 2001010517) once it makes 6 shared memory
> segments.  If it exits cleanly it removes them.  If it coredumps or I
> have to kill it the segments are left around, and ipcrm won't delete
> them:
> 
> $ ipcs -m
> Shared Memory:
> T     ID     KEY        MODE       OWNER    GROUP
> m 458752          0 --rwarwarwa      bjj    admin
> m  65537          0 --rwarwarwa      bjj    admin
> m  65538          0 --rwarwarwa      bjj    admin
> m  65539          0 --rwarwarwa      bjj    admin
> m  65540          0 --rwarwarwa      bjj    admin
> m  65541          0 --rwarwarwa      bjj    admin
> 
> $ ipcrm -m 458752
> ipcrm: shmid(458752): : Invalid argument
> 
> I didn't notice this until just now, when I had to reboot becuase my
> machine was totally out of segments.
> 
> FreeBSD pulsar.home.ben.com 4.2-STABLE FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE #2: Tue Dec 26 20:17:22 PST 2000     bjj@pulsar.home.ben.com:/a/src/sys/compile/PULSAR  i386

I've had the same problem. And it's not just with mozilla but also with
gnome etc. After my X session has been running for a while (with gnome
and sawfish), new gnome apps complain of shmget failing. Quitting gnome
and sawfish doesn't seem to get rid of the shm segments. And I can't
seem to remove them manually either.

It's turning ou tto be quite a pain in the ass.

Anand
-- 
Anand Ranganathan			anand@blandings.com
Random Wodehouse nugget:
Every author really wants to have letters printed in the papers.
Unable to make the grade, he drops down a rung of the ladder and writes
novels.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29  9:17:14 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from whistle.com (s205m131.whistle.com [207.76.205.131])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30FD837B404
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 09:16:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from smap@localhost)
	by whistle.com (8.10.0/8.10.0) id f0THGuE02083
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 09:16:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pau-amma.whistle.com( 207.76.205.64) by whistle.com via smap (V2.0)
	id xma002080; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 09:16:56 -0800
Received: (from dhw@localhost)
	by pau-amma.whistle.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f0THGu584049
	for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 09:16:56 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 09:16:56 -0800 (PST)
From: David Wolfskill <dhw@whistle.com>
Message-Id: <200101291716.f0THGu584049@pau-amma.whistle.com>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ipnat vs natd and ipf vs ipfw (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <4.2.2.20010127225302.01e75660@marble.sentex.net>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 22:54:20 -0500
>From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>

>At 07:20 PM 1/27/2001 -0500, Espen Oyslebo wrote:
>>Currently, I have ipfw and natd doing their job fairly well. Is there any 
>>point in switching (yeah,yeah, don't fix it if it ain't broken).

>Actually, I have found ipnat to be *much* faster for my home DSL 
>connection.  My gateway is a lowly Pentium 133 and I can only get full rate 
>net throughput use ipnat. natd is about 33% slower than ipnat for my setup 
>on PPPoE.

Curious.  My home firewall is (still) running FreeBSD 3.2-R; and it's a
P-120 with 16 MB memory... yet I was able to FTP a good-sized (>1 MB)
file from ftp.freebsd.org at >150 FB/s.  And I'm using ipfw & natd.

So far, I have been unable to attribute any degradation of the link to
the firewall, except when its disk drive crashed.

(My firewall box also does the external view of DNS for the outside
world, as well as slave DNS for a handful of other domains, and
sendmail.)

Cheers,
david
-- 
David Wolfskill      dhw@whistle.com   UNIX System Administrator
Desk: 650/577-7158   TIE: 8/499-7158   Cell: 650/759-0823


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29  9:22:11 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from smtp1.sentex.ca (smtp1.sentex.ca [199.212.134.4])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15C3C37B698
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 09:21:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from simoeon.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [209.112.4.47])
	by smtp1.sentex.ca (8.11.2/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f0THLag04626;
	Mon, 29 Jan 2001 12:21:36 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Message-Id: <5.0.1.4.0.20010129121235.037a5ec0@marble.sentex.ca>
X-Sender: mdtpop@marble.sentex.ca
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.1
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 12:15:25 -0500
To: David Wolfskill <dhw@whistle.com>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
Subject: Re: ipnat vs natd and ipf vs ipfw (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <200101291716.f0THGu584049@pau-amma.whistle.com>
References: <4.2.2.20010127225302.01e75660@marble.sentex.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

At 09:16 AM 1/29/01 -0800, David Wolfskill wrote:
> >Date: Sat, 27 Jan 2001 22:54:20 -0500
> >From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
>
> >At 07:20 PM 1/27/2001 -0500, Espen Oyslebo wrote:
> >>Currently, I have ipfw and natd doing their job fairly well. Is there any
> >>point in switching (yeah,yeah, don't fix it if it ain't broken).
>
> >Actually, I have found ipnat to be *much* faster for my home DSL
> >connection.  My gateway is a lowly Pentium 133 and I can only get full rate
> >net throughput use ipnat. natd is about 33% slower than ipnat for my setup
> >on PPPoE.
>
>Curious.  My home firewall is (still) running FreeBSD 3.2-R; and it's a
>P-120 with 16 MB memory... yet I was able to FTP a good-sized (>1 MB)
>file from ftp.freebsd.org at >150 FB/s.  And I'm using ipfw & natd.

Perhaps it was due to some interaction with natd and PPPoE. Not sure.  From 
the machine itself, I could get full rate throughput on all applications. 
It was only from the machines behind the FreeBSD box where I would notice a 
significant speed drop when using NAT.  Going through squid, or even socks5 
was/is quick-- only with nat would I see the speed drop (e.g. downloading 
binary attachments from my news server).  But as soon as I switched to 
ipnat, the speed was at expected levels from all my home workstations on 
all services.

         ---Mike



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29  9:36:19 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from whistle.com (s205m131.whistle.com [207.76.205.131])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C7BD37B400
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 09:35:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from smap@localhost)
	by whistle.com (8.10.0/8.10.0) id f0THZuF02321
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 09:35:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pau-amma.whistle.com( 207.76.205.64) by whistle.com via smap (V2.0)
	id xma002317; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 09:35:36 -0800
Received: (from dhw@localhost)
	by pau-amma.whistle.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f0THZaf84267
	for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 09:35:36 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 09:35:36 -0800 (PST)
From: David Wolfskill <dhw@whistle.com>
Message-Id: <200101291735.f0THZaf84267@pau-amma.whistle.com>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ipnat vs natd and ipf vs ipfw (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <5.0.1.4.0.20010129121235.037a5ec0@marble.sentex.ca>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 12:15:25 -0500
>From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>

>>Curious.  My home firewall is (still) running FreeBSD 3.2-R; and it's a
>>P-120 with 16 MB memory... yet I was able to FTP a good-sized (>1 MB)
>>file from ftp.freebsd.org at >150 FB/s.  And I'm using ipfw & natd.

>Perhaps it was due to some interaction with natd and PPPoE. Not sure.  From 
>the machine itself, I could get full rate throughput on all applications. 
>It was only from the machines behind the FreeBSD box where I would notice a 
>significant speed drop when using NAT.  Going through squid, or even socks5 
>was/is quick-- only with nat would I see the speed drop (e.g. downloading 
>binary attachments from my news server).  But as soon as I switched to 
>ipnat, the speed was at expected levels from all my home workstations on 
>all services.

Well, I do have a static IP address (good thing for running nameservers,
eh?).  Other than that, I don't see anything obviously so different in
configuration that might indicate the difference in behavior.

I just did an FTP from an internal machine (note that there was probably
some other activity, as my spouse is home doing something, and I'm at
work, logged in at home via ssh tunnel):

bunrab[6] ftp ftp.freebsd.org
Connected to ftp.freesoftware.com.
220 sourcerer.freesoftware.com FTP server (Version DG-4.0.62 974200128) ready.
Name (ftp.freebsd.org:david): ftp
331 Guest login ok, send your email address as password.
Password:
230-Welcome to ftp.freesoftware.com - home FTP site for Walnut Creek CDROM.
230-There are currently 849 users out of 5000 possible.
230-
...
230 Guest login ok, access restrictions apply.
Remote system type is UNIX.
Using binary mode to transfer files.
ftp> pass
Passive mode on.
ftp> dir
227 Entering Passive Mode (216,66,64,162,17,167)
150 Opening ASCII mode data connection for 'file list'.
total 137637
-r--r--r--  1 root  wheel        424 Feb 28  2000 README
drwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel        512 Feb 10  2000 archive-info
drwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel        512 Jul  5  2000 etc
-rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  124347711 Jan 29 13:24 ls-lR
-rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel   16587118 Jan 29 13:25 ls-lR.gz
drwxr-xr-x  2 root  wheel       1024 Nov 11 03:48 pub
226 Transfer complete.
ftp> get ls-lR
local: ls-lR remote: ls-lR
227 Entering Passive Mode (216,66,64,162,17,215)
150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for 'ls-lR' (124347711 bytes).
100% |**************************************************|   118 MB    00:00 ETA
226 Transfer complete.
124347711 bytes received in 852.83 seconds (142.39 KB/s)
ftp> 221 Goodbye!
bunrab[7] ifconfig -a
de0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
        inet 172.16.8.11 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 172.16.8.255
        ether 00:40:05:a2:08:71 
        media: autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>) status: active
        supported media: autoselect 100baseTX <full-duplex> 100baseTX 10baseT/UTP <full-duplex> 10baseT/UTP
lp0: flags=8810<POINTOPOINT,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
tun0: flags=8010<POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
sl0: flags=c010<POINTOPOINT,LINK2,MULTICAST> mtu 552
ppp0: flags=8010<POINTOPOINT,MULTICAST> mtu 1500
lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 16384
        inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 
bunrab[8] 


(That last was to demonstrate that I was doing the FTP from a machine on
the internal net, vs. the firewall itself.)

Cheers,
david
-- 
David Wolfskill      dhw@whistle.com   UNIX System Administrator
Desk: 650/577-7158   TIE: 8/499-7158   Cell: 650/759-0823


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29  9:41:21 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from firebat.bushong.net (c128625-a.frmt1.sfba.home.com [24.176.225.90])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6AFC037B400; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 09:40:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from dbushong@localhost)
	by firebat.bushong.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) id f0THeAb68772;
	Mon, 29 Jan 2001 09:40:10 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dbushong)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 09:40:09 -0800
From: David Bushong <david@bushong.net>
To: Cliff Sarginson <cliff@raggedclown.net>
Cc: "Justin W. Pauler" <jwpauler@jwpages.com>,
	freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: tail
Message-ID: <20010129094009.F16505@bushong.net>
References: <01012813255100.83352@gateway.drnet.fais.net> <20010128221801.A2923@raggedclown.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20010128221801.A2923@raggedclown.net>; from cliff@raggedclown.net on Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 10:18:01PM +0100
X-Floating-Sheep-Port: 0xbaa
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Sun, Jan 28, 2001 at 10:18:01PM +0100, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
>
> ...
> 
> However, on Linux there is a program called "watch" that repeatedly
> executes a command an displays it on the screen updating the
> display "in place" .. so it does not scroll away. I am sure there
> must be a similar program on BSD (I would like to know as well!)
> but the program named "watch" on FBSD is something
> different.
> 
> Cliff
> 
> 
On BSD, the similar program is called "display" and is in 
/usr/ports/misc/display   Note that it installs /usr/local/bin/display, which
is the same name as one of the binaries from the ImageMagick package.  I
have reported this as a bug to both port maintainers in the past and been
ignored, and thus renamed this one to "redisplay".

--David Bushong


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29  9:46:44 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from smtp1.sentex.ca (smtp1.sentex.ca [199.212.134.4])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 092BC37B400
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 09:46:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from simoeon.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [209.112.4.47])
	by smtp1.sentex.ca (8.11.2/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f0THkMF09680;
	Mon, 29 Jan 2001 12:46:22 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Message-Id: <5.0.1.4.0.20010129123814.03768a90@marble.sentex.ca>
X-Sender: mdtpop@marble.sentex.ca
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.1
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 12:40:10 -0500
To: David Wolfskill <dhw@whistle.com>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
Subject: Re: ipnat vs natd and ipf vs ipfw (fwd)
In-Reply-To: <200101291735.f0THZaf84267@pau-amma.whistle.com>
References: <5.0.1.4.0.20010129121235.037a5ec0@marble.sentex.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

At 09:35 AM 1/29/01 -0800, David Wolfskill wrote:
> >Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 12:15:25 -0500
> >From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
>
> >>Curious.  My home firewall is (still) running FreeBSD 3.2-R; and it's a
> >>P-120 with 16 MB memory... yet I was able to FTP a good-sized (>1 MB)
> >>file from ftp.freebsd.org at >150 FB/s.  And I'm using ipfw & natd.
>
> >Perhaps it was due to some interaction with natd and PPPoE. Not sure.  From
> >the machine itself, I could get full rate throughput on all applications.
> >It was only from the machines behind the FreeBSD box where I would notice a
> >significant speed drop when using NAT.  Going through squid, or even socks5
> >was/is quick-- only with nat would I see the speed drop (e.g. downloading
> >binary attachments from my news server).  But as soon as I switched to
> >ipnat, the speed was at expected levels from all my home workstations on
> >all services.
>
>Well, I do have a static IP address (good thing for running nameservers,
>eh?).  Other than that, I don't see anything obviously so different in
>configuration that might indicate the difference in behavior.

Me too as the ISP is me :-)  The only other thing I can think of is that 
the MTU on my internal machines is not 1500 to get around and problematic 
P-MTU issues.

         ---Mike



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29  9:48:14 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from eth.net (mailserver2.ddsl.net [202.9.145.19])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47ACF37B402
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 09:47:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eth.net ([202.9.169.190]) by eth.net  with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.357.35);
	 Mon, 29 Jan 2001 23:13:46 +0530
Message-ID: <3A75AC45.6B700119@eth.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 23:15:41 +0530
From: "C. Aravindan" <carvind@eth.net>
Organization: Personal
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (WinNT; I)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org
Subject: subscribe
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29  9:52:43 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from harp.wrdp.com (harp.dublin.wrdp.net [212.147.130.131])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E612D37B698
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 09:52:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from JRAFTERY (jraftery.dublin.wrdp.net [172.16.4.52])
	by harp.wrdp.com (Postfix) with SMTP
	id 0543410AC2; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 17:52:17 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <001501c08a1c$78da3e60$340410ac@JRAFTERY>
From: "James Raftery" <jraftery@wrdp.com>
To: "Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven" <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl>
Cc: <stable@freebsd.org>
References: <007f01c08a0c$d6518040$340410ac@JRAFTERY> <20010129171558.L88275@lucifer.bart.nl>
Subject: Re: BIND 8.2.3 into RELENG_3?
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 17:54:05 -0000
Organization: Worldport Communications Inc
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> Yes, I will ASAP import/MFC BIND 8.2.3-REL to 4-STABLE and 3-STABLE
> after my round of testing.  I am also cleaning up the named/named-xfer
> building which is sort of a hack at the moment.

That's excellent news - thanks!


Regards,

james



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29 10:33:50 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from horsey.gshapiro.net (horsey.gshapiro.net [209.220.147.178])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D37937B6C7
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 10:33:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from gshapiro@localhost)
	by horsey.gshapiro.net (8.12.0.Beta0/8.12.0.Beta0) id f0TIXS0j085496;
	Mon, 29 Jan 2001 10:33:28 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <14965.46968.693150.858856@horsey.gshapiro.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 10:33:28 -0800
From: Gregory Neil Shapiro <gshapiro@FreeBSD.ORG>
To: Claus Assmann <freebsd+stable@esmtp.org>
Cc: Mike Atkinson <mikea@kconline.com>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: LAME domains, sendmail BIND and FreeBSD- its FreeBSDspecific  it seems (was more strange DNS issues in BINDand STABLE.)-
In-Reply-To: <20010128110741.A6717@zardoc.endmail.org>
References: <034601c08827$b8e08d80$1385f1d8@kconline.com>
	<4.2.2.20010127001841.03015358@marble.sentex.net>
	<4.2.2.20010127204048.013addb0@marble.sentex.net>
	<T6vYbJveQt@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org>
	<047e01c0890d$9f42a8e0$1385f1d8@kconline.com>
	<20010128110741.A6717@zardoc.endmail.org>
X-Mailer: VM 6.90 under 21.2  (beta42) "Poseidon" XEmacs Lucid
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

ca> 8.12 will most likely have a workaround for this (as usual
ca> sendmail provides a workaround for almost every broken
ca> configuration...)

Also, note this from 8.11.2 (to be MFC'ed to RELENG_4 in the near future):

 When attempting to canonify a hostname, some broken name servers will
 return SERVFAIL (a temporary failure) on T_AAAA (IPv6) lookups.  If you
 want to excuse this behavior, compile sendmail with
 -D_FFR_WORKAROUND_BROKEN_NAMESERVERS.  However, instead, we recommend catching
 the problem and reporting it to the name server administrator so we can rid
 the world of broken name servers.

You can do this in your FreeBSD build by adding this to /etc/make.conf:

SENDMAIL_CFLAGS=-D_FFR_WORKAROUND_BROKEN_NAMESERVERS



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29 11:44:38 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from smtp1.sentex.ca (smtp1.sentex.ca [199.212.134.4])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8E69537B6EC; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 11:44:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from simoeon.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [209.112.4.47])
	by smtp1.sentex.ca (8.11.2/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f0TJiEQ33339;
	Mon, 29 Jan 2001 14:44:15 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Message-Id: <5.0.1.4.0.20010129143727.037b8620@marble.sentex.ca>
X-Sender: mdtpop@marble.sentex.ca
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.1
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 14:38:02 -0500
To: Gregory Neil Shapiro <gshapiro@FreeBSD.ORG>
From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
Subject: Re: LAME domains, sendmail BIND and FreeBSD- its
  FreeBSDspecific  it seems (was more strange DNS issues in BINDand
  STABLE.)-
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <14965.46968.693150.858856@horsey.gshapiro.net>
References: <20010128110741.A6717@zardoc.endmail.org>
 <034601c08827$b8e08d80$1385f1d8@kconline.com>
 <4.2.2.20010127001841.03015358@marble.sentex.net>
 <4.2.2.20010127204048.013addb0@marble.sentex.net>
 <T6vYbJveQt@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org>
 <047e01c0890d$9f42a8e0$1385f1d8@kconline.com>
 <20010128110741.A6717@zardoc.endmail.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

At 10:33 AM 1/29/01 -0800, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote:
>ca> 8.12 will most likely have a workaround for this (as usual
>ca> sendmail provides a workaround for almost every broken
>ca> configuration...)
>
>Also, note this from 8.11.2 (to be MFC'ed to RELENG_4 in the near future):


Thanks!  Any idea when the MFC will happen ?

         ---Mike



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29 11:45:40 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from horsey.gshapiro.net (horsey.gshapiro.net [209.220.147.178])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E30B37B404
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 11:45:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from gshapiro@localhost)
	by horsey.gshapiro.net (8.12.0.Beta0/8.12.0.Beta0) id f0TJjL8M086457;
	Mon, 29 Jan 2001 11:45:21 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <14965.51281.518973.771704@horsey.gshapiro.net>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 11:45:21 -0800
From: Gregory Neil Shapiro <gshapiro@FreeBSD.ORG>
To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: LAME domains, sendmail BIND and FreeBSD- its
  FreeBSDspecific  it seems (was more strange DNS issues in BINDand
  STABLE.)-
In-Reply-To: <5.0.1.4.0.20010129143727.037b8620@marble.sentex.ca>
References: <20010128110741.A6717@zardoc.endmail.org>
	<034601c08827$b8e08d80$1385f1d8@kconline.com>
	<4.2.2.20010127001841.03015358@marble.sentex.net>
	<4.2.2.20010127204048.013addb0@marble.sentex.net>
	<T6vYbJveQt@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org>
	<047e01c0890d$9f42a8e0$1385f1d8@kconline.com>
	<5.0.1.4.0.20010129143727.037b8620@marble.sentex.ca>
X-Mailer: VM 6.90 under 21.2  (beta42) "Poseidon" XEmacs Lucid
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

mike> Thanks!  Any idea when the MFC will happen ?

This week, free time (haha) allowing.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29 12:49:50 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from floater.nas.nasa.gov (floater.nas.nasa.gov [129.99.32.24])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2E6337B6A2
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 12:49:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from floater.nas.nasa.gov (IDENT:zWc4qT6oo936oOqYWEqJ+rO/KwGKph8X@localhost.nas.nasa.gov [127.0.0.1])
	by floater.nas.nasa.gov (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f0TKnUF00367
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 12:49:31 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from tweten@nas.nasa.gov)
Message-Id: <200101292049.f0TKnUF00367@floater.nas.nasa.gov>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 with nmh-1.0.4
Reply-To: tweten@nas.nasa.gov
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Stable Isn't, for VLB 486
From: Dave Tweten <tweten@nas.nasa.gov>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 12:49:30 -0800
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

I updated Stable on January 24 for both my 586 laptop (which I'm using to send 
this message) and my 486 VLB machine.  The kernel wouldn't boot on the 486.  
Thinking I might have hit Stable while it was suffering transient instability, 
I re-cvsupped on January 25, rebuilt world, rebuilt and reinstalled the 
kernel, and suffered the same panic while booting:

	.
	.
	.
	ahc0: <Adapted 284X SCSI adapter> at 0x8c00-0x8cff, irq 10 (edge)
	ahc0: on eisa0 slot 8


	Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
	fault virtual address	= 0x40
	fault code		= supervisor read, page not present
	instruction pointer	= 0x8:0xc015831a
	stack pointer		= 0x10:0xc030f394
	frame pointer		= 0x10:0xc030fe94
	code segment		= base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b
				= DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1
	processor eflags	= interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0
	current process		= 0 (swapper)
	interrupt mask		= net tty bio cam
	trap number		= 12
	panic: page fault
	Uptime: 0s
	Automatic reboot in 15 seconds - press a key on the console to abort

Help!  (Please)
-- 
M/S 258-5                     | 1024-bit PGP fingerprint: | tweten@nas.nasa.gov
NASA Ames Research Center     |  41 B0 89 0A  8F 94 6C 59 |      (650) 604-4416
Moffett Field, CA  94035-1000 |  7C 80 10 20  25 C7 2F E6 | FAX: (650) 604-4377
We each earn what freedom of speech we defend for those who most offend us.








To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29 13:36:25 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from meow.osd.bsdi.com (meow.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.28.88])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1B06537B6A1; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 13:35:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from laptop.baldwin.cx (john@jhb-laptop.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.28.241])
	by meow.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f0TLUE345019;
	Mon, 29 Jan 2001 13:30:15 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org)
Message-ID: <XFMail.010129133512.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <E14N95Z-0004Zw-00@cs.huji.ac.il>
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 13:35:12 -0800 (PST)
From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
To: Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il>
Subject: Re: Really odd "BTX halted" problem booting - PXE/diskless
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org,
	(Paul Saab) <paul@mu.org>, Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


On 29-Jan-01 Danny Braniss wrote:
> im now being bitten by this one, but with a twist:
>  on a compaq deskpro workstation it's ok
>  on a dell-precision 420, it bombs.
> both bioses are configured to boot via the network/pxe.
> 
> im using the same disks for both boxes.
> 
> i labeled the disks with:
>  dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/rda0 bs=1k count=1
>  disklabel -Brw da0 auto
> 
> i then went ahead an played with vinum, all went fine on the Compaq,
> i then wanted to do some comparisons, so i hooked up the disks to the Dell
> and now BTX bombs. 
> 
> is there a way, that when booting from the net, btx ignores the mbr/fdisk
> info?

BTX doesn't read your MBR, it sounds like the BIOS in the machine is crapping
itself out on the disks in question.  If you are using dangerously dedicated
mode on these disks, don't. :)

-- 

John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!"  -  http://www.FreeBSD.org/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29 13:40:29 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from sistina.com (hermes.sistina.com [208.210.145.141])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5A60437B699
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 13:40:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 15246 invoked from network); 29 Jan 2001 21:39:12 -0000
Received: from fry.sistina.com (HELO cesium.sistina.com) (208.210.145.138)
  by hermes.sistina.com with SMTP; 29 Jan 2001 21:39:12 -0000
Received: by cesium.sistina.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 29 Jan 2001 15:39:02 -0600
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 15:39:02 -0600
From: Tom Hudak <thudak@sistina.com>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: subscribe
Message-ID: <20010129153902.D12566@cesium.sistina.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5p8PegU4iirBW1oA"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.12i
X-Mailer: "GUI? I don't need no stinkin' GUI!" 
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


--5p8PegU4iirBW1oA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

subscribe

--5p8PegU4iirBW1oA
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6deL2Nsw/4hUS2O0RAiSOAKCJ6pYy/7FQrPDKZHvJnD6Ptb/eXgCgg+eU
DxUD02uPQst3Y/X/cpDDZ0g=
=0mhN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--5p8PegU4iirBW1oA--


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29 13:43:56 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from gemma.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (gemma.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [129.70.136.103])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 532C737B69E
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 13:43:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mime.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (mime.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [129.70.134.6])
	by gemma.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (8.9.1/8.9.1/TechFak/pk+ro20000427) with SMTP id WAA21557;
	Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:43:30 +0100 (MET)
From: Oliver Schonefeld <oschonef@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
Received: by mime.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (SMI-8.6/pk19971205)
	id WAA27648; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:43:30 +0100
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:43:29 +0100
To: Dave Tweten <tweten@nas.nasa.gov>
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Stable Isn't, for VLB 486
Message-ID: <20010129224329.A27628@mime.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
References: <200101292049.f0TKnUF00367@floater.nas.nasa.gov>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i
In-Reply-To: <200101292049.f0TKnUF00367@floater.nas.nasa.gov>; from tweten@nas.nasa.gov on Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 12:49:30PM -0800
X-Zen: Oooommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hello!

Eines schoenen Tages schrieb Dave Tweten:
> 	ahc0: <Adapted 284X SCSI adapter> at 0x8c00-0x8cff, irq 10 (edge)
> 	ahc0: on eisa0 slot 8
> 
> 
> 	Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
[registers snipped]
> 	panic: page fault

Same thing here!

Looks like this has been adresseed in current, or at least there is
something written about it.

> CVS log for src/sys/dev/aic7xxx/ahc_eisa.c

1.19 Mon Jan 22 21:03:46 2001 UTC by gibbs 

ahc_eisa.c:
        Initialize rid to 0.  This doesn't seem to make any difference
        (the driver doesn't care what rid it gets and no-one seems to
        check rid's value), but follows standard conventions.

        Pass in our device_t to ahc_alloc().  We now use device_T
        softc storage, so passing NULL results in a panic.

        Set the unit number in our softc so that the driver core
        can retrieve it.

My DDB traceback, which i have not handy right now has something with
ahc_alloc and softc in it. I can reproduce this, if someone needs the
traceback. I haven't had the time to investigate any further.


> Help!  (Please)

4.2-RELEASE works, at least for me, without any problem.

Regards,
Oliver
-- 
--------------------------------------------------------
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me in your ~/.signature
to help me spread!             <- Save this lifeform ;-)


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29 14:35: 6 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from westhost15.westhost.net (westhost15.westhost.net [216.71.84.69])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D431B37B400
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 14:34:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from beast (h0020af68b314.ne.mediaone.net [24.91.189.27])
	by westhost15.westhost.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA21632
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 16:46:05 -0600
From: "Paul A. Howes" <pahowes@fair-ware.com>
To: <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Celeron Question...
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 17:34:45 -0500
Message-ID: <BCEFKOJHNDEAJONMKMHEOEJMCHAA.pahowes@fair-ware.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
Importance: Normal
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

All-

I know this is completely off-topic for the stable mailing list, but no one
else seems to know the answer to this question:  What is the difference
between a Celeron and a Celeron FC-PGA CPU?  I am looking at several
motherboards from Tyan and ASUS, and all of them seem to have a Socket 370,
yet some models claim support for one variant of the chip, and other models
claim support for the other variant.  I would appreciate any help you can
render to alleviate this confusion.

Many thanks,
--
Paul A. Howes
pahowes@fair-ware.com



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29 15: 5:21 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from hal9000.bsdonline.org (ffaxvawx3-4-047.cox.rr.com [24.168.203.47])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF4FF37B400
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 15:05:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by hal9000.bsdonline.org (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 64B6D1F25; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 18:04:59 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 18:04:59 -0500
From: Andrew J Caines <A.J.Caines@altavista.net>
To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Cc: Tony Byrne <tony@nua.ie>
Subject: Re: syslogd throwing a hissy fit
Message-ID: <20010129180459.D372@hal9000.bsdonline.org>
Reply-To: Andrew J Caines <A.J.Caines@altavista.net>
Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Tony Byrne <tony@nua.ie>
References: <7q9u6t0tkj5ktplad6k8468koar3j8jvi9@4ax.com> <s7hu6torq3c79usoqpgig3b56gg9d5n6jr@4ax.com> <20010124223705.A92362@gosset.maths.tcd.ie> <5qou6tkiba9jk6nbjepe9hn2g45hq560ep@4ax.com> <20010121021039.A442@hal9000.bsdonline.org> <7q9u6t0tkj5ktplad6k8468koar3j8jvi9@4ax.com> <s7hu6torq3c79usoqpgig3b56gg9d5n6jr@4ax.com> <20010124223705.A92362@gosset.maths.tcd.ie> <20010128162429.A412@hal9000.bsdonline.org> <alma7t4noj9u417v4t026fuuffkoflhf75@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <alma7t4noj9u417v4t026fuuffkoflhf75@4ax.com>; from tony@nua.ie on Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 12:00:45PM +0000
Organization: H.A.L. Plant
X-Powered-by: FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE
Importance: Normal
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Folks,

Is anyone running STABLE cvsup'ed in the last couple of weeks with syslogd
logging console.info messages without error?


Tony,

Thanks for submitting the PR. I'd like to see it if you don't mind digging
up the reference.

> *.info;kern.debug;cron.notice;mail.crit;local2.none	/dev/console
> Remove '*.info;' from the beginning of the entry and restart syslogd.

I switched it to *.notice and fired up syslogd, which did exactly as you
predicted:

> This should avoid the trigger for this particular problem.

I'd neglected to consider the console facility being matched by the
wildcard.

This narrows down the problem to that is what is causing the console.info
messages.


-Andrew-
-- 
 _______________________________________________________________________
| -Andrew J. Caines-   Unix Systems Engineer   A.J.Caines@altavista.net |


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29 16:15:11 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from serio.al.rim.or.jp (serio.al.rim.or.jp [202.247.191.123])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEE2837B69C
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 16:14:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail2.rim.or.jp
	by serio.al.rim.or.jp (3.7W/HMX-13) id JAA13134;
	Tue, 30 Jan 2001 09:14:48 +0900 (JST)
Received: from localhost (ip39-102.fli.psinet.ne.jp [210.158.39.102]) by mail2.rim.or.jp (8.9.3/3.7W)
	id JAA09023; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 09:14:47 +0900 (JST)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 09:17:52 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20010130.091752.108736064.hrtk@kt.rim.or.jp>
To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: ulpt 
From: Honda Hirotaka <hrtk@kt.rim.or.jp>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.95b97 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

I am trying to use ulpt driveer to print with ALPS MD-5500 via USB
cable, but /dev/ulpt0 seems retuning "device busy" and don't print anything.
On demsg is "uhci_timeout: ii=0xc05a46e0".

I can't find where is the cause of the error.
This is the result of "lpr" and My check list of settings to  print
with ulpt. Please help me.


[Result]

$ lpr /tmp/test.ps
$ lpc 
lpc> status lp
lp:
	queuing is enabled
	printing is enabled
	no entries in spool area
	printer idle
lpc> quit
$  ls -lt /tmp |head -n 4
total 375
-rw-------  1 daemon    wheel      33 Jan 30 08:51 umd-error
-rw-------  1 daemon    wheel    7442 Jan 30 08:51 umd.1103.md
-rw-------  1 daemon    wheel    5425 Jan 30 08:50 umd.1103.ps
$
 (after "su")
# cat /tmp/umd-error 
I could not cat /tmp/umd.1103.md
# cat "abc" > /dev/ulpt0 

su: /dev/ulpt0: Device busy
#

[Settings]
1 kernel
1.1 kernel config file
1.2 dmesg
2 lpd
2.1 /etc/printcap
2.2 if filter
2.3 spool directory

1 kernel
1.1 kernel config file

# USB support
device		uhci		# UHCI PCI->USB interface
#device		ohci		# OHCI PCI->USB interface
device		usb		# USB Bus (required)
#device		ugen		# Generic
#device		uhid		# "Human Interface Devices"
#device		ukbd		# Keyboard
device		ulpt		# Printer
#device		umass		# Disks/Mass storage - Requires scbus and da
#device		ums		# Mouse
#device		uscanner	# Scanners
# hirotaka from LINT 20010129
options         UHCI_DEBUG
options         USB_DEBUG
options         ULPT_DEBUG
# USB Ethernet, requires mii
#device		aue		# ADMtek USB ethernet
#device		cue		# CATC USB ethernet
#device		kue		# Kawasaki LSI USB ethernet

1.2 dmesg
FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE #0: Mon Jan 29 15:22:59 JST 2001
    ...
uhci0: <Intel 82371AB/EB (PIIX4) USB controller> port 0x1820-0x183f irq 11 at device 7.2 on pci0
uhci0: LegSup = 0x00000030
uhci_run: setting run=0
uhci_run: done cmd=0xc0 sts=0x20
uhci_run: setting run=1
uhci_run: done cmd=0x81 sts=0x0
usb0: <Intel 82371AB/EB (PIIX4) USB controller> on uhci0
usb0: USB revision 1.0
uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1
uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
uhub1: Texas Instruments General Purpose USB Hub, class 9/0, rev 1.10/1.01, addr 2
uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered
ulpt0: ALPS     ALPS USB Printer Port           , rev 1.00/1.00, addr 3, iclass 7/1
    ...
pccard: card inserted, slot 0
ed1 at port 0x300-0x31f irq 3 slot 0 on pccard0
ed1: address 00:90:99:0b:d4:6c, type NE2000 (16 bit) 
uhci_timeout: ii=0xc05a46e0
uhci_timeout: ii=0xc05a46e0
uhci_timeout: ii=0xc05a46e0
uhci_timeout: ii=0xc05a46e0

2.1 /etc/printcap

lp|local line printer:\
	:sh:mx#0:\
	:lp=/dev/ulpt0:sd=/var/spool/output/lpd:\
	:if=/var/spool/filter/umd:\
	:lf=/var/log/lpd-errs:

2.2 /var/spool/filter/umd

#!/bin/sh -
PATH="/bin:/usr/bin"; export PATH

umask 077
IF=/tmp/umd.$$.ps
OF=/tmp/umd.$$.md

cat > $IF || exit 2
{ echo showpage; echo quit; } | \
/usr/local/bin/gs -q -dSAFER -dNOPAUSE -sPAPERSIZE=a4 -sDEVICE=md5k -r1200x600 -sOutputFile=$OF $IF 2>/dev/null >/dev/null || exit 2
#cat $OF || exit 2
cat $OF || (echo "I could not cat $OF">/tmp/umd-error ; exit 2)
#rm -f $IF $OF
exit 0

2.3 spool directory

$ cd /var/spool/output
$ ls -al
total 6
drwxr-xr-x   6 root    daemon  512 Jan 29 23:53 .
drwxr-xr-x  10 root    wheel   512 Jan  2 14:44 ..
drwxr-xr-x   2 daemon  daemon  512 Jan 29 00:55 dec
drwxr-xr-x   2 daemon  daemon  512 Jan 27 04:27 dj
drwxr-xr-x   2 root    daemon  512 Jan 30 00:25 lpd
drwxr-xr-x   2 daemon  daemon  512 Jan 27 04:44 md
$ ls -alR
total 6
drwxr-xr-x   6 root    daemon  512 Jan 29 23:53 .
drwxr-xr-x  10 root    wheel   512 Jan  2 14:44 ..
drwxr-xr-x   2 daemon  daemon  512 Jan 29 00:55 dec
drwxr-xr-x   2 daemon  daemon  512 Jan 27 04:27 dj
drwxr-xr-x   2 root    daemon  512 Jan 30 00:25 lpd
drwxr-xr-x   2 daemon  daemon  512 Jan 27 04:44 md

./dec:
total 5
drwxr-xr-x  2 daemon  daemon  512 Jan 29 00:55 .
drwxr-xr-x  6 root    daemon  512 Jan 29 23:53 ..
-rw-------  1 root    daemon    4 Jan 29 00:55 .seq
-rw-rw-r--  1 root    daemon    4 Jan 29 23:53 lock
-rw-rw-r--  1 root    daemon   15 Jan 29 00:55 status

./dj:
total 5
drwxr-xr-x  2 daemon  daemon  512 Jan 27 04:27 .
drwxr-xr-x  6 root    daemon  512 Jan 29 23:53 ..
-rw-r----x  1 root    daemon    4 Jan 27 04:25 .seq
-rwxrwxr--  1 root    daemon   22 Jan 27 04:27 lock
-rw-rw-r--  1 root    daemon    1 Jan 27 04:28 status

./lpd:
total 5
drwxr-xr-x  2 root  daemon  512 Jan 30 00:25 .
drwxr-xr-x  6 root  daemon  512 Jan 29 23:53 ..
-rw-------  1 root  daemon    4 Jan 30 00:25 .seq
-rw-rw-r--  1 root  daemon   22 Jan 30 00:25 lock
-rw-rw-r--  1 root  daemon   25 Jan 30 00:25 status

./md:
total 5
drwxr-xr-x  2 daemon  daemon  512 Jan 27 04:44 .
drwxr-xr-x  6 root    daemon  512 Jan 29 23:53 ..
-rw-r----x  1 root    daemon    4 Jan 27 04:43 .seq
-rwxrwxr--  1 root    daemon   22 Jan 27 04:43 lock
-rw-rw-r--  1 root    daemon    1 Jan 27 04:54 status
$

-- 
Honda Hirotaka LL.M.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29 16:47:29 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3A70A37B402; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 16:47:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from bright@localhost)
	by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id f0U0lCB07138;
	Mon, 29 Jan 2001 16:47:12 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 16:47:12 -0800
From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
To: Gregory Neil Shapiro <gshapiro@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: BIND 8.2.3 upgrade available
Message-ID: <20010129164711.K26076@fw.wintelcom.net>
References: <20010129143300.A38419@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010129153144.H26076@fw.wintelcom.net> <14966.3324.107528.104198@horsey.gshapiro.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <14966.3324.107528.104198@horsey.gshapiro.net>; from gshapiro@FreeBSD.ORG on Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 04:38:20PM -0800
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

* Gregory Neil Shapiro <gshapiro@FreeBSD.ORG> [010129 16:38] wrote:
> bright> Is there any chance that the bind and sendmail people could backport
> bright> -DNO_SENDMAIL and -DNO_NAMED to 3.x (and maybe 2.x)?
> 
> What does the BIND bug have to do with sendmail?

It was related in that, the sendmail and bind shipped with 2.2.x
and 3.x is pretty bad, and upgrades shouldn't get clobbered by make
world in case there's a system change.

It's nice to be able to clobber the /usr instead of installing into
/usr/local for older versions of FreeBSD.


-- 
-Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29 18: 2:45 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from www.golsyd.net.au (mail.golsyd.net.au [203.57.20.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71EC637B404
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 18:02:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [203.164.12.28] by www.quake.com.au (NTMail 4.30.0012/AH9370.63.d1acf55c) with ESMTP id qcxsaaaa for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 13:11:05 +1100
Message-ID: <3A7620C9.AE2C044C@quake.com.au>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 13:02:49 +1100
From: Kal Torak <kaltorak@quake.com.au>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Paul A. Howes" <pahowes@fair-ware.com>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Celeron Question...
References: <BCEFKOJHNDEAJONMKMHEOEJMCHAA.pahowes@fair-ware.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

"Paul A. Howes" wrote:
> 
> All-
> 
> I know this is completely off-topic for the stable mailing list, but no one
> else seems to know the answer to this question:  What is the difference
> between a Celeron and a Celeron FC-PGA CPU?  I am looking at several
> motherboards from Tyan and ASUS, and all of them seem to have a Socket 370,
> yet some models claim support for one variant of the chip, and other models
> claim support for the other variant.  I would appreciate any help you can
> render to alleviate this confusion.

Newer Celerons are based on the coppermine design, while the older ones are
based on a different one, the klamath or something I think...

The new Celerons are sometimes called Cerleron 2, and they have a faster L2
cache or something like that... AFAIK most all current motherboards with a
Socket 370 support both types... And Only Celerons over 600mhz are the new
coppermine ones...

Your best bet if you want more technical and definitive answers would be
to search the intel developers web site, but if you are just worried about
a motherboard not supporting your Celeron, dont be, if it supports a PIII
then its going to support both types of Celeron...

Hope that helps you out :)
Kal.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29 18:13:40 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.arc.net.my (nagano.arc.net.my [203.115.225.22])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 471BF37B402
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 18:13:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from arc.net.my ([203.115.227.134]) by mail.arc.net.my
          (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id G7YE6100.397 for
          <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 10:13:13 +0800 
Message-ID: <3A762492.84027928@arc.net.my>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 10:18:59 +0800
From: Yaresham Saaya <yaresham@arc.net.my>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE i386)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29 18:32:36 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from hnet04.kellyhendrix.com (unknown [208.233.247.37])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FCBB37B400
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 18:32:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: by hnet04.kellyhendrix.com (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 0C4F918C8B; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 21:32:31 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 21:32:31 -0500
From: Kelly Hendrix <kelly@compuage.com>
To: "Paul A. Howes" <pahowes@fair-ware.com>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Celeron Question...
Message-ID: <20010129213230.B702@hnet04.kellyhendrix.com>
Reply-To: Kelly Hendrix <kelly@compuage.com>
References: <BCEFKOJHNDEAJONMKMHEOEJMCHAA.pahowes@fair-ware.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <BCEFKOJHNDEAJONMKMHEOEJMCHAA.pahowes@fair-ware.com>; from pahowes@fair-ware.com on Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 05:34:45PM -0500
X-Freebsd-Version: FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE i386
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Greetings

Try http://www4.tomshardware.com/cpu/00q3/000720/index.html Look
around a bit, and I'm sure you'll find some other info.
	
Kelly

On Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 05:34:45PM -0500, Paul A. Howes wrote:
> All-
> 
> I know this is completely off-topic for the stable mailing list, but no one
> else seems to know the answer to this question:  What is the difference
> between a Celeron and a Celeron FC-PGA CPU?  I am looking at several
> motherboards from Tyan and ASUS, and all of them seem to have a Socket 370,
> yet some models claim support for one variant of the chip, and other models
> claim support for the other variant.  I would appreciate any help you can
> render to alleviate this confusion.
> 
> Many thanks,
> --
> Paul A. Howes
> pahowes@fair-ware.com
> 
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

-- 
 ______________________________________________________________________
| There are two ways to live your life.  One is as though nothing is a |
| miracle.  The other is as though everything is a miracle.            |
|                                                                      |
|	Albert Einstein (1879-1955)                                    |
|______________________________________________________________________|


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29 19: 9:34 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from entropy.mx (CC2-2464.charter-stl.com [24.217.121.178])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E242737B400
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 19:09:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from ajh3@localhost)
	by entropy.mx (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f0U393l71577
	for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 21:09:03 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from ajh3)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 21:09:03 -0600
From: Andrew Hesford <ajh3@chmod.ath.cx>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: ES1371 Audio
Message-ID: <20010129210903.A60263@cec.wustl.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
X-Loop: Andrew Hesford
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

I've got the ES1371 audio card (Creative SoundBlaster 64 PCI) running
under 4.2-STABLE with the pcm driver.

I don't know if the hardware supports mixing, but I do know that the
card has two separate DSPs, allowing playback from two sources at once.

In linux, this allowed the use of /dev/dsp0 and /dev/dsp1
simultaneously. However, in FreeBSD, I get this output from
/dev/sndstat:
	FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm) Jan 26 2001 23:59:23
	Installed devices:
	pcm0: <AudioPCI ES1371> at io 0xdf00 irq 10 (1p/1r channels duplex)

/dev/dsp1 does not work, and I can only open dsp0 in one application at
a time.

Has anybody configured their machine to use multiple dsp devices with
this card, or to allow multiple programs to open dsp0 at the same time?

This would be a great help.

Thanks,
Andrew Hesford
-- 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29 20:22: 9 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from macb.macb.perm.su (macb.macb.perm.su [195.222.128.193])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B8A4A37B402
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 20:21:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gdg.perm.cbr.ru by macb.macb.perm.su id aa05424;
          30 Jan 101 9:21 winter
Received: from gdg.perm.cbr.ru ([10.77.193.14])
	by mserv.perm.cbr.ru with esmtp (Exim 3.13 #1)
	id 14NSFv-0001Fg-00
	for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 09:18:59 +0500
Received: from localhost.perm.cbr.ru ([127.0.0.1] helo=gdg.perm.cbr.ru)
	by gdg.perm.cbr.ru with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 14NSGB-000DtO-00
	for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 09:19:15 +0500
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Strange behavior of USB and ulpt printer 
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 09:19:15 +0500
From: "Dmitry G. Golub" <dgolub@gdg.perm.cbr.ru>
Message-Id: <E14NSGB-000DtO-00@gdg.perm.cbr.ru>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


Dear colleguas,

I have a lot of problems when I am trying to connect my Canon BJC-6100
to computer via USB interface. Under Win98 all seems OK, so I think it
is not a hardware problem. When I added USB support to my kernel
(devices "uhci", "usb", "ugen", "ulpt", 4.2-STABLE (Jan 21)) my machine 
begin to hang with no diagnostics -- picture on screen "freezes", and computer
does not react on any keyboard events. I cannot check the network/serial
events -- this is my home machine not connected to network.

The printer behavior is a bit more strange -- when I send a small document
(a few lines) to printer, all seems OK, but large documents are printed
only partially. The printer stops in the middle of the page.

Because Canon's 6xxx series does not have hardware character generator,
I am printing via Ghostscript only, but with same GS configuration printer
works very well on LPT port. Have anybody any ideas? Have anybody any success
with USB printers such as Canon 6100?

Sorry for my poor English. I hope you can understand me.

-- 
Dmitry Golub
dgolub@gdg.perm.cbr.ru


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29 20:39: 3 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from magic.adaptec.com (magic.adaptec.com [208.236.45.80])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD9BC37B402
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 20:38:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from redfish.adaptec.com (redfish.adaptec.com [162.62.50.11])
	by magic.adaptec.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA10684;
	Mon, 29 Jan 2001 20:34:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from btc.btc.adaptec.com (btc.btc.adaptec.com [162.62.64.10])
	by redfish.adaptec.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA18020;
	Mon, 29 Jan 2001 20:27:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from btcexc01.btc.adaptec.com (btcexc01 [162.62.147.10])
	by btc.btc.adaptec.com (8.8.8+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA21041;
	Mon, 29 Jan 2001 21:34:11 -0700 (MST)
Received: by btcexc01.btc.adaptec.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
	id <ZGX271LR>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 21:34:12 -0700
Message-ID: <E0BFB46945D5D411BB590000D11ABE920333E0@btcexc01.btc.adaptec.com>
From: "Long, Scott" <scott_long@btc.adaptec.com>
To: "'Andrew Hesford'" <ajh3@chmod.ath.cx>,
	freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: RE: ES1371 Audio
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 21:34:09 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> /dev/sndstat:
> 	FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm) Jan 26 2001 23:59:23
> 	Installed devices:
> 	pcm0: <AudioPCI ES1371> at io 0xdf00 irq 10 (1p/1r channels duplex)
                                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

According to /dev/sndstat, the driver instance for that card only supports
one playback and one record channel.

> /dev/dsp1 does not work, and I can only open dsp0 in one application at
> a time.

Correct.  /dev/dsp1 implies you are trying to open the first playback
channel on the second sound card in the system.  Since I highly doubt that
you have two sound cards, this fails.  If a driver supports n number of
channels, they would be accessed via /dev/dsp0.n-1.  There are sound drivers
out there, such as the SBLive driver, that support more than one playback
and/or record channel.  I'm not familiar enough with the ES137x driver to
know whether it's the driver or the hardware that is limiting you in this
case.

> Has anybody configured their machine to use multiple dsp devices with
> this card, or to allow multiple programs to open dsp0 at the same time?

There are various sound servers that act as a proxy for the playback channel
and allow multiple apps to connect to them simulatiously.  Unfortunately,
they each require their own protocol that your sound app must be aware of.

Scott 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29 20:56: 8 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from xena.gsicomp.on.ca (cr677933-a.ktchnr1.on.wave.home.com [24.43.230.149])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB9D637B404
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 20:55:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hermes (hermes.gsicomp.on.ca [192.168.0.18])
	by xena.gsicomp.on.ca (8.11.1/8.9.3) with SMTP id f0U4rsi05101;
	Mon, 29 Jan 2001 23:53:58 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from matt@gsicomp.on.ca)
Message-ID: <007801c08a79$c287a7c0$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca>
From: "Matthew Emmerton" <matt@gsicomp.on.ca>
To: "Paul A. Howes" <pahowes@fair-ware.com>,
	<freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
References: <BCEFKOJHNDEAJONMKMHEOEJMCHAA.pahowes@fair-ware.com>
Subject: Re: Celeron Question...
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 00:01:48 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> I know this is completely off-topic for the stable mailing list, but no
one
> else seems to know the answer to this question:  What is the difference
> between a Celeron and a Celeron FC-PGA CPU?

Early Celerons (ie 300, 333 MHz) were a Slot 1 design.  The FCPGA design
uses the Socket 370 design, and has been used for everything 400MHz and
above.

Some Slot 1 motherboards work with Slot 1 Celerons, some don't.  (Almost)
all Slot 1 motherboards can use a FCPGA Celeron with the appropriate Socket
370/Slot 1 adapter card.

--
Matt Emmerton



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29 21: 1:48 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from hobbiton.shire.net (frogmorton.shire.net [204.228.145.136])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D01C37B699
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 21:01:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [216.64.45.172] (helo=[192.168.99.123])
	by hobbiton.shire.net with esmtp (Exim 2.04 #5)
	id 14NSuu-0008ZV-00; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:01:21 -0700
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 23:53:41 -0500
From: "Chad Leigh, Pengar Enterprises, Inc & Shire.Net LLC" <chad@pengar.com>
Reply-To: chad@pengar.com
To: Matthew Emmerton <matt@gsicomp.on.ca>,
	"Paul A. Howes" <pahowes@fair-ware.com>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Celeron Question...
Message-ID: <1559877558.980812421@[192.168.99.123]>
In-Reply-To: <007801c08a79$c287a7c0$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/2.0.5 (Win32)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hi

This is not true.  There are 2 Celeron Socket 370 CPU types.  The PPGA and 
the FCPGA type.  They have different pinouts.  The FCPGA started at 533 and 
the PPGA ended at 53.  You an get 533 in both types.  They are not 
interchangeable.  That is why you have 370 converters for older 
motherboards to take the newer FCPGA type CPUs.  The Abit BP6 is oe 
example.  It is for PPGA type CPUs and you cannot use FCPGA on them without 
a converter, and then reliably only 1 CPU instead of two.

Chad

--On Tuesday, January 30, 2001 12:01 AM -0500 Matthew Emmerton 
<matt@gsicomp.on.ca> wrote:

>> I know this is completely off-topic for the stable mailing list, but no
> one
>> else seems to know the answer to this question:  What is the difference
>> between a Celeron and a Celeron FC-PGA CPU?
>
> Early Celerons (ie 300, 333 MHz) were a Slot 1 design.  The FCPGA design
> uses the Socket 370 design, and has been used for everything 400MHz and
> above.
>
> Some Slot 1 motherboards work with Slot 1 Celerons, some don't.  (Almost)
> all Slot 1 motherboards can use a FCPGA Celeron with the appropriate
> Socket 370/Slot 1 adapter card.
>
> --
> Matt Emmerton
>
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message



Pengar Enterprises, Inc. and Shire.Net LLC
Web and Macintosh Consulting -- full service web hosting
Chad Leigh	
chad@pengar.com			chad@shire.net



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29 21: 5:17 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from cgi.sstar.com (cgi.sstar.com [209.205.176.12])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7571437B699
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 21:04:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bluto.jimking.net (root@bluto.jimking.net [216.54.255.8])
	by cgi.sstar.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f0U54os43522
	(using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168 bits) verified OK);
	Mon, 29 Jan 2001 23:04:55 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from jim@jimking.net)
Received: from marble (marble.lgc.com [134.132.228.4])
	by bluto.jimking.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f0U54lL77751;
	Mon, 29 Jan 2001 23:04:48 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from jim@jimking.net)
Message-ID: <001701c08a7a$2c7cbf30$04e48486@marble>
From: "Jim King" <jim@jimking.net>
To: "Matthew Emmerton" <matt@gsicomp.on.ca>
Cc: <stable@freebsd.org>
References: <BCEFKOJHNDEAJONMKMHEOEJMCHAA.pahowes@fair-ware.com> <007801c08a79$c287a7c0$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca>
Subject: Re: Celeron Question...
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 23:04:47 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

"Matthew Emmerton" <matt@gsicomp.on.ca>:

> > I know this is completely off-topic for the stable mailing list, but no
> one
> > else seems to know the answer to this question:  What is the difference
> > between a Celeron and a Celeron FC-PGA CPU?
>
> Early Celerons (ie 300, 333 MHz) were a Slot 1 design.  The FCPGA design
> uses the Socket 370 design, and has been used for everything 400MHz and
> above.

Celerons from 266 MHz up to 500 MHz or so were available in Slot1.
Somewhere along the line they also started producing them in a Socket370
package called PPGA.  Same core as the Slot1 guys, but in a different
package.

When the Coppermine version of the Pentium III came along Intel came up with
a new package called FC-PGA that also fits in Socket370.  The lobotomized
version of this core is the newer Celeron (aka Celeron II and
Coppermine128).

FC-PGA CPU's have a couple slight changes in their pinout.  Although they
will physically fit in any Socket370, they will not work in motherboards
that were only designed to accomodate PPGA CPU's.

All the Socket370 motherboards on the market nowadays can accomodate both
PPGA and FC-PGA CPU's.

Jim




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29 22: 7:28 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from engr.orst.edu (ENGR.ORST.EDU [128.193.54.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F9CD37B400
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:07:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eel.ENGR.ORST.EDU (eel.ENGR.ORST.EDU [128.193.55.69])
	by engr.orst.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA28663;
	Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:07:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from shepard@localhost)
	by eel.ENGR.ORST.EDU (8.9.3/8.9.3) id WAA28441;
	Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:07:03 -0800 (PST)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:07:03 -0800
From: Darren Shepard <shepard@engr.orst.edu>
To: Jim King <jim@jimking.net>
Cc: Matthew Emmerton <matt@gsicomp.on.ca>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Celeron Question...
Message-ID: <20010129220703.E27525@eel.ENGR.ORST.EDU>
Reply-To: Darren Shepard <dss@orst.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> Celerons from 266 MHz up to 500 MHz or so were available in Slot1.
> Somewhere along the line they also started producing them in a Socket370
> package called PPGA.  Same core as the Slot1 guys, but in a different
> package.

Not to be picky or anything, but I believe the last Slot1 celery was a 
400MHz part.   Also the Celeron 266 and Celeron 300 had no L2-cache.
The Celeron 300A (medicino? core) was the first with 128K L2 cache.
All faster celerons (to this date) still have 128K L2.

> When the Coppermine version of the Pentium III came along Intel came up with
> a new package called FC-PGA that also fits in Socket370.  The lobotomized
> version of this core is the newer Celeron (aka Celeron II and
> Coppermine128).
> 
> FC-PGA CPU's have a couple slight changes in their pinout.  Although they
> will physically fit in any Socket370, they will not work in motherboards
> that were only designed to accomodate PPGA CPU's.
> 
> All the Socket370 motherboards on the market nowadays can accomodate both
> PPGA and FC-PGA CPU's.
> 
> Jim

-- 
Darren Shepard | dss@orst.edu


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29 22:10:10 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from xena.gsicomp.on.ca (cr677933-a.ktchnr1.on.wave.home.com [24.43.230.149])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1CFE37B404
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:09:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hermes (hermes.gsicomp.on.ca [192.168.0.18])
	by xena.gsicomp.on.ca (8.11.1/8.9.3) with SMTP id f0U684i05287;
	Tue, 30 Jan 2001 01:08:04 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from matt@gsicomp.on.ca)
Message-ID: <019601c08a84$1ceb1b20$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca>
From: "Matthew Emmerton" <matt@gsicomp.on.ca>
To: <chad@pengar.com>, "Paul A. Howes" <pahowes@fair-ware.com>,
	<freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
References: <1559877558.980812421@[192.168.99.123]>
Subject: Re: Celeron Question...
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 01:15:55 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hi

I stand corrected.  (I should point out that I've been out of the 'hardware
sales' business for about 8 months -- the last Celeron I sold was a 400,
hence PPGA.  Since then, everything I've used has been PIII Slot1
exclusively, due to moronic pricing structures and supply shortages of
anything but by my primary supplier.)

--
Matt Emmerton

> Hi
>
> This is not true.  There are 2 Celeron Socket 370 CPU types.  The PPGA and
> the FCPGA type.  They have different pinouts.  The FCPGA started at 533
and
> the PPGA ended at 53.  You an get 533 in both types.  They are not
> interchangeable.  That is why you have 370 converters for older
> motherboards to take the newer FCPGA type CPUs.  The Abit BP6 is oe
> example.  It is for PPGA type CPUs and you cannot use FCPGA on them
without
> a converter, and then reliably only 1 CPU instead of two.
>
> Chad
>
> --On Tuesday, January 30, 2001 12:01 AM -0500 Matthew Emmerton
> <matt@gsicomp.on.ca> wrote:
>
> >> I know this is completely off-topic for the stable mailing list, but no
> > one
> >> else seems to know the answer to this question:  What is the difference
> >> between a Celeron and a Celeron FC-PGA CPU?
> >
> > Early Celerons (ie 300, 333 MHz) were a Slot 1 design.  The FCPGA design
> > uses the Socket 370 design, and has been used for everything 400MHz and
> > above.
> >
> > Some Slot 1 motherboards work with Slot 1 Celerons, some don't.
(Almost)
> > all Slot 1 motherboards can use a FCPGA Celeron with the appropriate
> > Socket 370/Slot 1 adapter card.
> >
> > --
> > Matt Emmerton
> >
> >
> >
> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
>
>
>
> Pengar Enterprises, Inc. and Shire.Net LLC
> Web and Macintosh Consulting -- full service web hosting
> Chad Leigh
> chad@pengar.com chad@shire.net
>
>



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29 22:21:18 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from wyattearp.stanford.edu (wyattearp.Stanford.EDU [171.64.180.171])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F98137B400
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:21:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from richw@localhost)
	by wyattearp.stanford.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id WAA80815;
	Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:20:33 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from richw)
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:20:33 -0800 (PST)
From: Rich Wales <richw@webcom.com>
X-Sender: richw@wyattearp.stanford.edu
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Bridge and ARP problem?
Message-ID: <20010130060046.80489.richw@wyattearp.stanford.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

I'm running -STABLE (cvsup'ed on 26jan2001) on a machine at home
which I've configured as a bridge (options BRIDGE).

After some problems with a PnP ISA network card ("ed" driver), I'm
running more or less successfully, bridging between two PCI NICs
("xl0" to the Internet, and "rl0" to an internal network).

Now, though, I'm having ARP problems.  A machine on the "rl0" NIC
is unable to get a hardware address for the bridge ("arp -a" shows
the bridge's ARP entry as "incomplete").

If I turn off bridging (sysctl -w net.link.ether.bridge=0), the
ARP problem quickly resolves itself and the two affected machines
can talk to each other.  So the problem would seem to be related
to the bridge code.

For whatever reason, the bridge is having no problems talking over
its other interface (xl0).

I can sidestep the problem by doing an "arp -s" command on the other
machine to tell it the bridge's hardware address -- but I shouldn't
have to do this.

Any ideas?

Rich Wales         richw@webcom.com         http://www.webcom.com/richw/



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29 22:23: 7 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from dante.naver.co.id (unknown [202.155.86.83])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 500D337B402; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:22:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by dante.naver.co.id (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id BD67E53552; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 13:22:00 +0700 (JAVT)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 13:22:00 +0700
From: John Indra <john@naver.co.id>
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: -CURRENT and -STABLE against XFree86 4.0.2 problem
Message-ID: <20010130132200.A451@naver.co.id>
Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org,
	freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0F1p//8PRICkK4MW"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.2.5i on FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


--0F1p//8PRICkK4MW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi...

Forgive me if I'm being such a nuisance. I wish I can help but I don't have
the strength to :(

I have seen many responses that prove that there is something WRONG with agp
support both in -CURRENT and -STABLE if used against XFree86 4.0.2. Here is
another one:

----- Forwarded message from Andrea Campi <andrea@webcom.it> -----

>From: Andrea Campi <andrea@webcom.it>
>To: Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl>
>Cc: John Indra <john@naver.co.id>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
>Subject: Re: -CURRENT and XFree86 4.0.2 problem
>Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 03:04:30 +0100
>
>> > I suspect (from the error log) that this has something to do with Intel 810
>> > chipset and -CURRENT agp module.
>> 
>> FWIW, I have the same problem with a -STABLE from jan. 20th. So the bug is
>> probably also in the -STABLE agp module, or else it is XFree86-4.0.2_5
>> (I also blew away /usr/local and /usr/X11R6 before installing it).
>
>I have been just bitten by the same problem, on -STABLE. Having rebuilt
>the world I can not swear it's not a problem in the kernel, but:
>
>/usr/src/sys/pci/agp.c
>
>so, either changes to other parts of the system broke agp, or the port
>is indeed broken. Quite a few changes to AGP GART configuration went in
>from 4.0.1 to 4.0.2, and it's not very clear if they DTRT.
>
>Anybody has any hint, or at least the knowledge to investigate? If so,
>I will send logfiles etc.
>Otherwise I will have to try and get everything back to the time when we
>had 4.0.1...
>
>Bye,
>	Andrea
>
>-- 
>Failure is not an option. It comes bundled with your Microsoft product.

----- End forwarded message -----

I have open up a PR, and I think that this problem is critical and must be
addressed ASAP.
Attached is a log file which I hope can be a help even maybe a little one.

FYI Hardware is Intel 815 with latest -CURRENT as I'm writing this mail.

Thanks...

/john


--0F1p//8PRICkK4MW
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="XFree86.0.log"


XFree86 Version 4.0.2 / X Window System
(protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6400)
Release Date: 18 December 2000
	If the server is older than 6-12 months, or if your card is
	newer than the above date, look for a newer version before
	reporting problems.  (See http://www.XFree86.Org/FAQ)
Operating System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386 [ELF] 
Module Loader present
(==) Log file: "/var/log/XFree86.0.log", Time: Tue Jan 30 13:08:04 2001
(==) Using config file: "/etc/X11/XF86Config"
Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
         (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
         (WW) warning, (EE) error, (??) unknown.
(==) ServerLayout "Simple Layout"
(**) |-->Screen "Screen 1" (0)
(**) |   |-->Monitor "My Monitor"
(**) |   |-->Device "My VGA Card"
(**) |-->Input Device "Mouse0"
(**) |-->Input Device "Keyboard1"
(**) Option "AutoRepeat" "500 30"
(WW) Option "XkbCompat" requires an string value
(**) Option "XkbRules" "xfree86"
(**) XKB: rules: "xfree86"
(**) Option "XkbModel" "pc104"
(**) XKB: model: "pc104"
(**) Option "XkbLayout" "us"
(**) XKB: layout: "us"
(**) FontPath set to "unix/:7100"
(**) RgbPath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb"
(==) ModulePath set to "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules"
(II) xf86ReadBIOS(f8000, e80, Buf, 2)-> b4 09 2c fb...
(--) Using syscons driver with X support (version 2.0)
(--) using VT number 9

(II) Module ABI versions:
	XFree86 ANSI C Emulation: 0.1
	XFree86 Video Driver: 0.3
	XFree86 XInput driver : 0.1
	XFree86 Server Extension : 0.1
	XFree86 Font Renderer : 0.2
(II) Loader running on freebsd
(II) LoadModule: "bitmap"
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libbitmap.a
(II) Module bitmap: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
	compiled for 4.0.2, module version = 1.0.0
	Module class: XFree86 Font Renderer
	ABI class: XFree86 Font Renderer, version 0.2
(II) Loading font Bitmap
(II) LoadModule: "pcidata"
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libpcidata.a
(II) Module pcidata: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
	compiled for 4.0.2, module version = 0.1.0
	ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3
(II) PCI: Probing config type using method 1
(II) PCI: Config type is 1
(II) PCI: stages = 0x03, oldVal1 = 0x8000f948, mode1Res1 = 0x80000000
(II) PCI: PCI scan (all values are in hex)
(II) PCI: 00:00:0: chip 8086,1130 card 1043,8027 rev 02 class 06,00,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 00:02:0: chip 8086,1132 card 1043,8027 rev 02 class 03,00,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 00:1e:0: chip 8086,244e card 0000,0000 rev 01 class 06,04,00 hdr 01
(II) PCI: 00:1f:0: chip 8086,2440 card 0000,0000 rev 01 class 06,01,00 hdr 80
(II) PCI: 00:1f:1: chip 8086,244b card 1043,8027 rev 01 class 01,01,80 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 00:1f:3: chip 8086,2443 card 1043,8027 rev 01 class 0c,05,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 01:0a:0: chip 10b7,9200 card 10b7,1000 rev 6c class 02,00,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: 01:0b:0: chip 1274,5880 card 1274,2000 rev 02 class 04,01,00 hdr 00
(II) PCI: End of PCI scan
(II) LoadModule: "scanpci"
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libscanpci.a
(II) Module scanpci: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
	compiled for 4.0.2, module version = 0.1.0
	ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3
(II) UnloadModule: "scanpci"
(II) Unloading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libscanpci.a
(II) Host-to-PCI bridge:
(II) PCI-to-ISA bridge:
(II) PCI-to-PCI bridge:
(II) Bus 0: bridge is at (0:0:0), (-1,0,0), BCTRL: 0x00 (VGA_EN is cleared)
(II) Bus 0 I/O range:
	[0] -1	0x00000000 - 0x0000ffff (0x10000) IX[B]
(II) Bus 0 non-prefetchable memory range:
	[0] -1	0x00000000 - 0xffffffff (0x0) MX[B]
(II) Bus 0 prefetchable memory range:
	[0] -1	0x00000000 - 0xffffffff (0x0) MX[B]
(II) Bus 1: bridge is at (0:30:0), (0,1,1), BCTRL: 0x06 (VGA_EN is cleared)
(II) Bus 1 I/O range:
	[0] -1	0x0000d000 - 0x0000d0ff (0x100) IX[B]
	[1] -1	0x0000d400 - 0x0000d4ff (0x100) IX[B]
	[2] -1	0x0000d800 - 0x0000d8ff (0x100) IX[B]
	[3] -1	0x0000dc00 - 0x0000dcff (0x100) IX[B]
(II) Bus 1 non-prefetchable memory range:
	[0] -1	0xf6800000 - 0xf6ffffff (0x800000) MX[B]
(II) Bus 1 prefetchable memory range:
	[0] -1	0xf7f00000 - 0xf7ffffff (0x100000) MX[B]
(II) Bus -1: bridge is at (0:31:0), (0,-1,0), BCTRL: 0x00 (VGA_EN is cleared)
(II) Bus -1 I/O range:
(II) Bus -1 non-prefetchable memory range:
(II) Bus -1 prefetchable memory range:
(--) PCI:*(0:2:0) Intel i815 rev 2, Mem @ 0xf8000000/26, 0xf7000000/19
(II) Addressable bus resource ranges are
	[0] -1	0x00000000 - 0xffffffff (0x0) MX[B]
	[1] -1	0x00000000 - 0x0000ffff (0x10000) IX[B]
(II) OS-reported resource ranges:
	[0] -1	0xffe00000 - 0xffffffff (0x200000) MX[B](B)
	[1] -1	0x00100000 - 0x3fffffff (0x3ff00000) MX[B]E(B)
	[2] -1	0x000f0000 - 0x000fffff (0x10000) MX[B]
	[3] -1	0x000c0000 - 0x000effff (0x30000) MX[B]
	[4] -1	0x00000000 - 0x0009ffff (0xa0000) MX[B]
	[5] -1	0x00000000 - 0x000001ff (0x200) IX[B]E
(II) Active PCI resource ranges:
	[0] -1	0xf6800000 - 0xf6ffffff (0x800000) MX[B]E
	[1] -1	0xf7000000 - 0xf707ffff (0x80000) MX[B](B)
	[2] -1	0xf8000000 - 0xfbffffff (0x4000000) MX[B](B)
	[3] -1	0x0000d400 - 0x0000d4ff (0x100) IX[B]E
	[4] -1	0x0000d800 - 0x0000d8ff (0x100) IX[B]E
	[5] -1	0x0000e800 - 0x0000e8ff (0x100) IX[B]E
	[6] -1	0x0000b800 - 0x0000b8ff (0x100) IX[B]E
(II) Active PCI resource ranges after removing overlaps:
	[0] -1	0xf6800000 - 0xf6ffffff (0x800000) MX[B]E
	[1] -1	0xf7000000 - 0xf707ffff (0x80000) MX[B](B)
	[2] -1	0xf8000000 - 0xfbffffff (0x4000000) MX[B](B)
	[3] -1	0x0000d400 - 0x0000d4ff (0x100) IX[B]E
	[4] -1	0x0000d800 - 0x0000d8ff (0x100) IX[B]E
	[5] -1	0x0000e800 - 0x0000e8ff (0x100) IX[B]E
	[6] -1	0x0000b800 - 0x0000b8ff (0x100) IX[B]E
(II) OS-reported resource ranges after removing overlaps with PCI:
	[0] -1	0xffe00000 - 0xffffffff (0x200000) MX[B](B)
	[1] -1	0x00100000 - 0x3fffffff (0x3ff00000) MX[B]E(B)
	[2] -1	0x000f0000 - 0x000fffff (0x10000) MX[B]
	[3] -1	0x000c0000 - 0x000effff (0x30000) MX[B]
	[4] -1	0x00000000 - 0x0009ffff (0xa0000) MX[B]
	[5] -1	0x00000000 - 0x000001ff (0x200) IX[B]E
(II) All system resource ranges:
	[0] -1	0xffe00000 - 0xffffffff (0x200000) MX[B](B)
	[1] -1	0x00100000 - 0x3fffffff (0x3ff00000) MX[B]E(B)
	[2] -1	0x000f0000 - 0x000fffff (0x10000) MX[B]
	[3] -1	0x000c0000 - 0x000effff (0x30000) MX[B]
	[4] -1	0x00000000 - 0x0009ffff (0xa0000) MX[B]
	[5] -1	0xf6800000 - 0xf6ffffff (0x800000) MX[B]E
	[6] -1	0xf7000000 - 0xf707ffff (0x80000) MX[B](B)
	[7] -1	0xf8000000 - 0xfbffffff (0x4000000) MX[B](B)
	[8] -1	0x00000000 - 0x000001ff (0x200) IX[B]E
	[9] -1	0x0000d400 - 0x0000d4ff (0x100) IX[B]E
	[10] -1	0x0000d800 - 0x0000d8ff (0x100) IX[B]E
	[11] -1	0x0000e800 - 0x0000e8ff (0x100) IX[B]E
	[12] -1	0x0000b800 - 0x0000b8ff (0x100) IX[B]E
(II) LoadModule: "dbe"
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libdbe.a
(II) Module dbe: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
	compiled for 4.0.2, module version = 1.0.0
	Module class: XFree86 Server Extension
	ABI class: XFree86 Server Extension, version 0.1
(II) Loading extension DOUBLE-BUFFER
(II) LoadModule: "extmod"
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/extensions/libextmod.a
(II) Module extmod: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
	compiled for 4.0.2, module version = 1.0.0
	Module class: XFree86 Server Extension
	ABI class: XFree86 Server Extension, version 0.1
(II) Loading extension SHAPE
(II) Loading extension MIT-SUNDRY-NONSTANDARD
(II) Loading extension BIG-REQUESTS
(II) Loading extension SYNC
(II) Loading extension MIT-SCREEN-SAVER
(II) Loading extension XC-MISC
(II) Loading extension XFree86-VidModeExtension
(II) Loading extension XFree86-Misc
(II) Loading extension DPMS
(II) Loading extension FontCache
(II) Loading extension TOG-CUP
(II) Loading extension Extended-Visual-Information
(II) Loading extension XVideo
(II) LoadModule: "type1"
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libtype1.a
(II) Module type1: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
	compiled for 4.0.2, module version = 1.0.0
	Module class: XFree86 Font Renderer
	ABI class: XFree86 Font Renderer, version 0.2
(II) Loading font Type1
(II) Loading font CID
(II) LoadModule: "freetype"
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/fonts/libfreetype.a
(II) Module freetype: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
	compiled for 4.0.2, module version = 1.1.8
	Module class: XFree86 Font Renderer
	ABI class: XFree86 Font Renderer, version 0.2
(II) Loading font FreeType
(II) LoadModule: "i810"
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/i810_drv.o
(II) Module i810: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
	compiled for 4.0.2, module version = 1.0.0
	Module class: XFree86 Video Driver
	ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3
(II) LoadModule: "mouse"
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/input/mouse_drv.o
(II) Module mouse: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
	compiled for 4.0.2, module version = 1.0.0
	Module class: XFree86 XInput Driver
	ABI class: XFree86 XInput driver, version 0.1
(II) I810: Driver for Intel i810 chipset: i810, i810-dc100, i810e, i815
(II) Primary Device is: PCI 00:02:0
(--) Assigning device section with no busID to primary device
(--) Chipset i815 found
(II) resource ranges after xf86ClaimFixedResources() call:
	[0] -1	0xffe00000 - 0xffffffff (0x200000) MX[B](B)
	[1] -1	0x00100000 - 0x3fffffff (0x3ff00000) MX[B]E(B)
	[2] -1	0x000f0000 - 0x000fffff (0x10000) MX[B]
	[3] -1	0x000c0000 - 0x000effff (0x30000) MX[B]
	[4] -1	0x00000000 - 0x0009ffff (0xa0000) MX[B]
	[5] -1	0xf6800000 - 0xf6ffffff (0x800000) MX[B]E
	[6] -1	0xf7000000 - 0xf707ffff (0x80000) MX[B](B)
	[7] -1	0xf8000000 - 0xfbffffff (0x4000000) MX[B](B)
	[8] -1	0x00000000 - 0x000001ff (0x200) IX[B]E
	[9] -1	0x0000d400 - 0x0000d4ff (0x100) IX[B]E
	[10] -1	0x0000d800 - 0x0000d8ff (0x100) IX[B]E
	[11] -1	0x0000e800 - 0x0000e8ff (0x100) IX[B]E
	[12] -1	0x0000b800 - 0x0000b8ff (0x100) IX[B]E
(II) resource ranges after probing:
	[0] -1	0xffe00000 - 0xffffffff (0x200000) MX[B](B)
	[1] -1	0x00100000 - 0x3fffffff (0x3ff00000) MX[B]E(B)
	[2] -1	0x000f0000 - 0x000fffff (0x10000) MX[B]
	[3] -1	0x000c0000 - 0x000effff (0x30000) MX[B]
	[4] -1	0x00000000 - 0x0009ffff (0xa0000) MX[B]
	[5] -1	0xf6800000 - 0xf6ffffff (0x800000) MX[B]E
	[6] -1	0xf7000000 - 0xf707ffff (0x80000) MX[B](B)
	[7] -1	0xf8000000 - 0xfbffffff (0x4000000) MX[B](B)
	[8] 0	0x000a0000 - 0x000affff (0x10000) MS[B]
	[9] 0	0x000b0000 - 0x000b7fff (0x8000) MS[B]
	[10] 0	0x000b8000 - 0x000bffff (0x8000) MS[B]
	[11] -1	0x00000000 - 0x000001ff (0x200) IX[B]E
	[12] -1	0x0000d400 - 0x0000d4ff (0x100) IX[B]E
	[13] -1	0x0000d800 - 0x0000d8ff (0x100) IX[B]E
	[14] -1	0x0000e800 - 0x0000e8ff (0x100) IX[B]E
	[15] -1	0x0000b800 - 0x0000b8ff (0x100) IX[B]E
	[16] 0	0x000003b0 - 0x000003bb (0xc) IS[B]
	[17] 0	0x000003c0 - 0x000003df (0x20) IS[B]
(II) Setting vga for screen 0.
(II) Loading sub module "vgahw"
(II) LoadModule: "vgahw"
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libvgahw.a
(II) Module vgahw: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
	compiled for 4.0.2, module version = 0.1.0
	ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3
(**) I810(0): Depth 24, (--) framebuffer bpp 24
(==) I810(0): RGB weight 888
(==) I810(0): Default visual is TrueColor
(--) I810(0): Chipset: "i815"
(--) I810(0): Linear framebuffer at 0xF8000000
(--) I810(0): IO registers at addr 0xF7000000
(II) I810(0): I810CheckAvailableMemory: 98304k available
(**) I810(0): Will alloc AGP framebuffer: 8192 kByte
(==) I810(0): Using gamma correction (1.0, 1.0, 1.0)
(II) I810(0): My Monitor: Using hsync range of 30.00-70.00 kHz
(II) I810(0): My Monitor: Using vrefresh range of 50.00-160.00 Hz
(II) I810(0): Clock range:  12.00 to 136.00 MHz
(WW) I810(0): Default mode "1280x960" deleted (bad mode clock/interlace/doublescan)
(WW) I810(0): Default mode "1280x1024" deleted (hsync out of range)
(WW) I810(0): Default mode "1280x1024" deleted (bad mode clock/interlace/doublescan)
(WW) I810(0): Default mode "1600x1200" deleted (bad mode clock/interlace/doublescan)
(WW) I810(0): Default mode "1600x1200" deleted (bad mode clock/interlace/doublescan)
(WW) I810(0): Default mode "1600x1200" deleted (bad mode clock/interlace/doublescan)
(WW) I810(0): Default mode "1600x1200" deleted (bad mode clock/interlace/doublescan)
(WW) I810(0): Default mode "1600x1200" deleted (bad mode clock/interlace/doublescan)
(WW) I810(0): Default mode "1792x1344" deleted (bad mode clock/interlace/doublescan)
(WW) I810(0): Default mode "1792x1344" deleted (bad mode clock/interlace/doublescan)
(WW) I810(0): Default mode "1856x1392" deleted (bad mode clock/interlace/doublescan)
(WW) I810(0): Default mode "1856x1392" deleted (bad mode clock/interlace/doublescan)
(WW) I810(0): Default mode "1920x1440" deleted (bad mode clock/interlace/doublescan)
(WW) I810(0): Default mode "1920x1440" deleted (bad mode clock/interlace/doublescan)
(--) I810(0): Virtual size is 1024x768 (pitch 1024)
(**) I810(0): Mode "1024x768": 85.0 MHz, 63.4 kHz, 79.4 Hz
(==) I810(0): DPI set to (75, 75)
(II) Loading sub module "fb"
(II) LoadModule: "fb"
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libfb.a
(II) Module fb: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
	compiled for 4.0.2, module version = 1.0.0
	ABI class: XFree86 ANSI C Emulation, version 0.1
(II) Loading sub module "xaa"
(II) LoadModule: "xaa"
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libxaa.a
(II) Module xaa: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
	compiled for 4.0.2, module version = 1.0.0
	ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3
(II) Loading sub module "ramdac"
(II) LoadModule: "ramdac"
(II) Loading /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/libramdac.a
(II) Module ramdac: vendor="The XFree86 Project"
	compiled for 4.0.2, module version = 0.1.0
	ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.3
Symbol VBEInit from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/i810_drv.o is unresolved!
Symbol vbeDoEDID from module /usr/X11R6/lib/modules/drivers/i810_drv.o is unresolved!
(==) Depth 24 pixmap format is 32 bpp
(II) do I need RAC?  No, I don't.
(II) resource ranges after preInit:
	[0] 0	0xf7000000 - 0xf707ffff (0x80000) MS[B]
	[1] 0	0xf8000000 - 0xfbffffff (0x4000000) MS[B]
	[2] -1	0xffe00000 - 0xffffffff (0x200000) MX[B](B)
	[3] -1	0x00100000 - 0x3fffffff (0x3ff00000) MX[B]E(B)
	[4] -1	0x000f0000 - 0x000fffff (0x10000) MX[B]
	[5] -1	0x000c0000 - 0x000effff (0x30000) MX[B]
	[6] -1	0x00000000 - 0x0009ffff (0xa0000) MX[B]
	[7] -1	0xf6800000 - 0xf6ffffff (0x800000) MX[B]E
	[8] -1	0xf7000000 - 0xf707ffff (0x80000) MX[B](B)
	[9] -1	0xf8000000 - 0xfbffffff (0x4000000) MX[B](B)
	[10] 0	0x000a0000 - 0x000affff (0x10000) MS[B](OprD)
	[11] 0	0x000b0000 - 0x000b7fff (0x8000) MS[B](OprD)
	[12] 0	0x000b8000 - 0x000bffff (0x8000) MS[B](OprD)
	[13] -1	0x00000000 - 0x000001ff (0x200) IX[B]E
	[14] -1	0x0000d400 - 0x0000d4ff (0x100) IX[B]E
	[15] -1	0x0000d800 - 0x0000d8ff (0x100) IX[B]E
	[16] -1	0x0000e800 - 0x0000e8ff (0x100) IX[B]E
	[17] -1	0x0000b800 - 0x0000b8ff (0x100) IX[B]E
	[18] 0	0x000003b0 - 0x000003bb (0xc) IS[B](OprU)
	[19] 0	0x000003c0 - 0x000003df (0x20) IS[B](OprU)
(==) I810(0): Write-combining range (0xf7000000,0x80000) was already clear
(==) I810(0): Write-combining range (0xf8000000,0x2000000) was already set
(==) I810(0): Write-combining range (0xa0000,0x10000) was already clear
(II) I810(0): Setting dot clock to 84.9 MHz [ 0x2c 0xb 0x20 ] [ 46 13 2 ]
(II) I810(0): chose watermark 0x22218000: (tab.freq 94.5)
(WW) I810(0): xf86AllocateGARTMemory: allocation of 1024 pages failed
	(Cannot allocate memory)
(II) I810(0): No physical memory available for 4194304 bytes of DCACHE
(II) I810(0): Adding 512 scanlines for pixmap caching
(II) I810(0): Allocated Scratch Memory
(II) I810(0): Using XFree86 Acceleration Architecture (XAA)
	Screen to screen bit blits
	Solid filled rectangles
	8x8 mono pattern filled rectangles
	Indirect CPU to Screen color expansion
	Solid Horizontal and Vertical Lines
	Offscreen Pixmaps
(==) I810(0): Backing store disabled
(==) I810(0): Silken mouse enabled
(II) I810(0): direct rendering: Disabled
(II) Initializing built-in extension MIT-SHM
(II) Initializing built-in extension XInputExtension
(II) Initializing built-in extension XTEST
(II) Initializing built-in extension XKEYBOARD
(II) Initializing built-in extension LBX
(II) Initializing built-in extension XC-APPGROUP
(II) Initializing built-in extension SECURITY
(II) Initializing built-in extension XINERAMA
(II) Initializing built-in extension XFree86-Bigfont
(II) Initializing built-in extension RENDER
(**) Option "Protocol" "MouseSystems"
(**) Mouse0: Protocol: "MouseSystems"
(**) Option "CorePointer"
(**) Mouse0: Core Pointer
(**) Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse"
(**) Option "BaudRate" "1200"
(**) Option "StopBits" "2"
(**) Option "DataBits" "8"
(**) Option "Parity" "None"
(**) Option "Vmin" "1"
(**) Option "Vtime" "0"
(**) Option "FlowControl" "None"
(==) Mouse0: Buttons: 3
(**) Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5"
(**) Mouse0: ZAxisMapping: buttons 4 and 5
(**) Mouse0: BaudRate: 1200
(II) Keyboard "Keyboard1" handled by legacy driver
(II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device "Mouse0" (type: MOUSE)
(**) Option "BaudRate" "1200"
GetModeLine - scrn: 0 clock: 85000
GetModeLine - hdsp: 1024 hbeg: 1088 hend: 1196 httl: 1340
              vdsp: 768 vbeg: 772 vend: 775 vttl: 799 flags: 0
(WW) I810(0): xf86BindGARTMemory: binding of gart memory with key 1
	at offset 0x0 failed (No such file or directory)

Fatal server error:
EnterVT failed for screen 0


When reporting a problem related to a server crash, please send
the full server output, not just the last messages.
This can be found in the log file "/var/log/XFree86.0.log".
Please report problems to xfree86@xfree86.org.

pgetbl_ctl: 0x59b001 pgetbl_err: 0x19
ipeir: 0 iphdr: 0
LP ring tail: 8 head: 0 len: 0 start 0
eir: 0 esr: 10 emr: 3d
instdone: ff7b instpm: 0
memmode: 24 instps: 0
hwstam: 9ac7 ier: 0 imr: 9ac7 iir: 0
space: 65520 wanted 65528

FatalError re-entered, aborting
lockup


--0F1p//8PRICkK4MW--


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29 22:54:23 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from xena.gsicomp.on.ca (cr677933-a.ktchnr1.on.wave.home.com [24.43.230.149])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C2CF37B69B
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 22:54:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hermes (hermes.gsicomp.on.ca [192.168.0.18])
	by xena.gsicomp.on.ca (8.11.1/8.9.3) with SMTP id f0U6qHi05366
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 01:52:17 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from matt@gsicomp.on.ca)
Message-ID: <001901c08a8a$4aafa980$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca>
From: "Matthew Emmerton" <matt@gsicomp.on.ca>
To: "FreeBSD Stable" <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: File ownership strangeness
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 02:00:11 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hi all,

I recently cvsup'd and built/installed 4-STABLE (Jan 19th or thereabouts).

While skimming through my new installation, I noticed a pair of
"discrepancies":

gabby# l /sbin/ping*
-r-sr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  195660 Jan 27 00:57 ping
-r-sr-xr-x  1 root  bin    190880 Jan 27 00:57 ping6
gabby# l /usr/sbin/trace*
-r-sr-xr-x  1 root  wheel  13168 Jan 27 01:06 traceroute
-r-sr-xr-x  1 root  bin     14952 Jan 27 01:06 traceroute6
gabby#

Indeed, the makefiles for ping6 and traceroute6 specify bin as the group
rather than wheel.  Shouldn't they be wheel?

--
Matt Emmerton



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Mon Jan 29 23:34: 3 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from entropy.mx (CC2-2464.charter-stl.com [24.217.121.178])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C613137B698; Mon, 29 Jan 2001 23:33:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from ajh3@localhost)
	by entropy.mx (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f0U7Wx106896;
	Tue, 30 Jan 2001 01:32:59 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from ajh3)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 01:32:59 -0600
From: Andrew Hesford <ajh3@chmod.ath.cx>
To: John Indra <john@naver.co.id>
Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: -CURRENT and -STABLE against XFree86 4.0.2 problem
Message-ID: <20010130013259.A6855@cec.wustl.edu>
References: <20010130132200.A451@naver.co.id>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20010130132200.A451@naver.co.id>; from john@naver.co.id on Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 01:22:00PM +0700
X-Loop: Andrew Hesford
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Thank god other people are having trouble with XFree86 4.0.2 and the
i810 chipset, I was beginning to think I was going crazy. Even the guys
in #freebsd (irc.openprojects.net) think I'm an idiot because I can't
get it working =)

The problem is actually worse than a simple lockup. The server crashes
whenever I change virtual terminals. When I try to go back to ttyv8
(which holds my Xserver), it crashes with a "Fatal Error: lockup"
message. An attempt to restart the server will show me a garbled-color
screen, and then my display shuts off altogether, until I reboot (my
monitor tells me the scan frequency is out of range; I don't know what's
going on in there).

I'm certainly not a code warrior, and I have absolutely no experience
with agp-related programming in X or otherwise, but I did try to patch
it (failing miserably). I've noticed that the I810FreeGART function is
commented out in the driver, which leads me to believe that Linux
automatically handles GART cleanup when the memory is no longer needed.
However, if the FreeBSD agpgart code does not handle cleanup, it could
be the source of this bug, since the xserver would then be unable to 
gain access to memory.

Just a thought, remember that I know nothing about AGP programming. 

I would really like to see this problem fixed. Currently I am using
XFree86 4.0.1, which bothers me simply on principle that I can't
upgrade :)

Thanks,
Andrew Hesford
-- 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30  1:16:53 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from lucifer.ninth-circle.org (intotcpcb.sourcewh0re.net [194.158.168.74])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9594B37B69E
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 01:16:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from asmodai@localhost)
	by lucifer.ninth-circle.org (8.11.1/8.11.0) id f0U9GOF08632;
	Tue, 30 Jan 2001 10:16:24 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from asmodai)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 10:16:24 +0100
From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl>
To: James Raftery <jraftery@wrdp.com>
Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: BIND 8.2.3 into RELENG_3?
Message-ID: <20010130101623.C8263@lucifer.bart.nl>
References: <007f01c08a0c$d6518040$340410ac@JRAFTERY> <20010129171558.L88275@lucifer.bart.nl> <001501c08a1c$78da3e60$340410ac@JRAFTERY>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <001501c08a1c$78da3e60$340410ac@JRAFTERY>; from jraftery@wrdp.com on Mon, Jan 29, 2001 at 05:54:05PM -0000
Organisation: VIA Net.Works The Netherlands
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

-On [20010129 18:55], James Raftery (jraftery@wrdp.com) wrote:
>> Yes, I will ASAP import/MFC BIND 8.2.3-REL to 4-STABLE and 3-STABLE
>> after my round of testing.  I am also cleaning up the named/named-xfer
>> building which is sort of a hack at the moment.
>
>That's excellent news - thanks!

Due to some source changes and resulting hackery which I am now trying
to clean up I'd advise people to use at least make buildworld for
building the new BIND and not try it by hand unless you know what you
are doing. =-P

This will be fixed ASAP, but getting the security holes fixed is worth
the ignoring the aesthetics for now. :)

-- 
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven          VIA Net.Works The Netherlands
BSD: Technical excellence at its best  Network- and systemadministrator
	  D78D D0AD 244D 1D12 C9CA  7152 035C 1138 546A B867
Misery loves company...


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30  2:58:16 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from aikane.aikane.net (157.m69.one.catskill.net [209.177.41.157])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B77637B4AB
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 02:57:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from aikane.aikane.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by aikane.aikane.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f0UAwUJ00265
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 05:58:31 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from wyrdwulf@catskill.net)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 05:58:30 -0500
From: "Eric K. Wolven" <wyrdwulf@catskill.net>
To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org
Subject: /dev/mixer
Message-Id: <20010130055830.10a881cf.wyrdwulf@catskill.net>
X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.4.9 (GTK+ 1.2.8; FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE; i386)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hello:

I installed the aumix-gtk port but I get an error message: "/dev/mixer no such file or directory found".

I get the same message under "/usr/sbin/mixer".
I've run "cd /dev  ./MAKEDEV all" but no luck with /dev/mixer.

Any suggestions?

Thanks.

Eric



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30  3: 3: 0 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from asterix.proact.no (mail.proact.no [62.92.24.68])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0137E37B6C7
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 03:02:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tom.proact.no (TOM [192.168.200.92]) by asterix.proact.no with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21)
	id D9P4CBD1; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 12:05:00 +0100
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 12:01:41 +0100 (CET)
From: Tom.Lislegaard@proact.no
X-Sender: tl@tom.proact.no
To: "Eric K. Wolven" <wyrdwulf@catskill.net>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: /dev/mixer
In-Reply-To: <20010130055830.10a881cf.wyrdwulf@catskill.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101301200510.1163-100000@tom.proact.no>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


Try 'MAKEDEV snd0'

-tom

On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Eric K. Wolven wrote:

> Hello:
> 
> I installed the aumix-gtk port but I get an error message: "/dev/mixer no such file or directory found".
> 
> I get the same message under "/usr/sbin/mixer".
> I've run "cd /dev  ./MAKEDEV all" but no luck with /dev/mixer.
> 
> Any suggestions?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Eric
> 
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
> 



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30  3:58:52 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from tzeench.dhs.org (h24-70-93-66.ed.shawcable.net [24.70.93.66])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FFA037B6B6
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 03:58:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (darren@localhost)
	by tzeench.dhs.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f0UBwXJ00365
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 04:58:33 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from darren@tzeench.dhs.org)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 04:58:33 -0700 (MST)
From: Darren <darren@tzeench.dhs.org>
To: <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: network lag problem fixed?
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0101300452290.357-100000@tzeench.dhs.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

alright, I posted to this mailing list about my network lag problem some
time ago.  I recently met up with someone on irc from the efnet
#freebsdhelp channel who experienced the exact same behavior from
windows2000.  he explained the problem to me as such: {
windows 2000 has a problem finding the arp, to fix it simply enter arp -s
(gatewayip) (ethernet address)
or
arp -s 192.168.1.1 00-20-78-17-5f-6e
I found it was going from my lan to my isp and back.
}
I was very happy to see my speed go from 60kps to 1000kps on internal lan
traffic between win2k and freebsd.   however shortly after I was told I
was dead wrong and that I should take a course to understand what I was
saying.  I'd like some input on this.. am I wrong?  is the speed increase
for some other reason?  or does this guy just have a fat head?

-Darren



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30  4: 6:50 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from post.mail.nl.demon.net (post-11.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 615EC37B6BA
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 04:06:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [195.11.243.26] (helo=Debug)
	by post.mail.nl.demon.net with smtp (Exim 3.14 #4)
	id 14NZYJ-00048k-00; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 12:06:27 +0000
To: Darren <darren@tzeench.dhs.org>, <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
From: Cliff Sarginson <cliff@raggedclown.net>
Subject: Re: network lag problem fixed?
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 12:06:27 GMT
X-Mailer: www.webmail.nl.demon.net
X-Sender: postmaster@btvs.demon.nl
X-Originating-IP: 192.250.25.251
Message-Id: <E14NZYJ-00048k-00@post.mail.nl.demon.net>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> alright, I posted to this mailing list about my network lag problem some
> time ago.  I recently met up with someone on irc from the efnet
> #freebsdhelp channel who experienced the exact same behavior from
> windows2000.  he explained the problem to me as such: {
> windows 2000 has a problem finding the arp, to fix it simply enter arp -s
> (gatewayip) (ethernet address)
> or
> arp -s 192.168.1.1 00-20-78-17-5f-6e
> I found it was going from my lan to my isp and back.
> }
> I was very happy to see my speed go from 60kps to 1000kps on internal lan
                                           ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> traffic between win2k and freebsd.   however shortly after I was told I
> was dead wrong and that I should take a course to understand what I was
> saying.  I'd like some input on this.. am I wrong?  is the speed increase
> for some other reason?  or does this guy just have a fat head?
                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Draw your own conclusions :)

Cliff





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30  5:31:53 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from bakhtin.amt.ru (station120.amt.ru [212.111.64.120])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64D8437B4EC
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 05:31:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from bakhtin@localhost)
	by bakhtin.amt.ru (8.11.0/8.11.1) id f0UDVTG80399;
	Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:31:29 +0300 (MSK)
	(envelope-from bakhtin)
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: can't make buildworld on yesterday's stable
Organization: AMT Group
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 1.5)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Alex Bakhtin <bakhtin@amt.ru>
Date: 30 Jan 2001 16:31:29 +0300
Message-ID: <87ofwpnp3i.fsf@bakhtin.amt.ru>
Lines: 32
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.45/XEmacs 21.1 - "Channel Islands"
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hello,

	I'm getting the following error when trying to compile yesterday's
	fbsd-stable:
=========================
cu.h: No such file or directory
/mnt/export/src/usr.bin/kdump/../../sys/i386/isa/pcvt/pcvt_hdr.h:120: i386/isa/isa.h: No such file or directory
In file included from ioctl.c:108:
>/mnt/export/src/usr.bin/kdump/../../sys/i386/isa/pcvt/pcvt_hdr.h:250: #error "Supported keyboard scancode sets are 1 and 2 only (for now)!!!"
In file included from ioctl.c:140:
/mnt/export/src/usr.bin/kdump/../../sys/sys/kbio.h:47: warning: `KB_OTHER' redefined
/mnt/export/src/usr.bin/kdump/../../sys/i386/isa/pcvt/pcvt_hdr.h:164: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
In file included from ioctl.c:141:
/mnt/export/src/usr.bin/kdump/../../sys/sys/memrange.h:18: warning: `MDF_ACTIVE' redefined
/usr/obj/mnt/export/src/i386/usr/include/pccard/cardinfo.h:81: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
In file included from ioctl.c:153:
/mnt/export/src/usr.bin/kdump/../../sys/sys/wormio.h:102: warning: `CDRIOCBLANK' redefined
/mnt/export/src/usr.bin/kdump/../../sys/sys/cdrio.h:59: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
mkdep: compile failed
*** Error code 1

Stop in /mnt/export/src/usr.bin/kdump.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /mnt/export/src/usr.bin.
=========================

	It seems that there could be some problem with my tree? 

-- 
Best regards, -- Alex Bakhtin.
AMT Group, Cisco Systems Gold Partner, http://www.amt.ru


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30  5:46: 9 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from serio.al.rim.or.jp (serio.al.rim.or.jp [202.247.191.123])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48FA437B4E0
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 05:45:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail3.rim.or.jp
	by serio.al.rim.or.jp (3.7W/HMX-13) id WAA18226;
	Tue, 30 Jan 2001 22:45:50 +0900 (JST)
Received: from localhost (ip42-238.fli.psinet.ne.jp [210.158.42.238]) by mail3.rim.or.jp (8.9.3/3.7W)
	id WAA05534; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 22:45:46 +0900 (JST)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 22:48:55 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <20010130.224855.74755432.hrtk@kt.rim.or.jp>
To: bakhtin@amt.ru
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: can't make buildworld on yesterday's stable
From: Honda Hirotaka <hrtk@kt.rim.or.jp>
In-Reply-To: <87ofwpnp3i.fsf@bakhtin.amt.ru>
References: <87ofwpnp3i.fsf@bakhtin.amt.ru>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.95b97 on Emacs 20.7 / Mule 4.0 (HANANOEN)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Is it complaining about the PCVT_SCANSET option of your kernel config
file ?

 From: Alex Bakhtin <bakhtin@amt.ru>
 Subject: can't make buildworld on yesterday's stable
 Date: 30 Jan 2001 16:31:29 +0300
 Message-ID: <87ofwpnp3i.fsf@bakhtin.amt.ru>

> In file included from ioctl.c:108:
> >/mnt/export/src/usr.bin/kdump/../../sys/i386/isa/pcvt/pcvt_hdr.h:250: #error "Supported keyboard scancode sets are 1 and 2 only (for now)!!!"

(in LINT)
# This PCVT option is for keyboards such as those used on IBM ThinkPad laptops
options 	PCVT_SCANSET=2 		# IBM keyboards are non-std

-- 
Honda, Hirotaka LL.M.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30  6: 9:35 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from cs.huji.ac.il (cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.10])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 639B237B4AB; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 06:09:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sexta.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.16.13] ident=danny)
	by cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 14NbT3-0001B7-00; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:09:09 +0200
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000 with nmh-0.24
To: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@scsiguy.com>
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: disk problem 
In-reply-to: Your message of Mon, 29 Jan 2001 06:45:53 -0700 .
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:09:08 +0200
From: Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il>
Message-Id: <E14NbT3-0001B7-00@cs.huji.ac.il>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In message <200101291345.f0TDjrO51982@aslan.scsiguy.com>you write:
}>i did the vinum stuff again, but now im getting all kind of errors.
}>btw, the kernel is of this morning (4.2 cvsuped this morning - local time), i
}>noticed some fixes to the aic7xxx. 
}
}You have a bad cable or terminator.  The 7899 runs quite a bit faster
}than the 2940U, so the problem may not have shown itself with your
}previous configuration.

you sounded so convincing, that I pulled up my sleeves, opened up the box, 
fiddled around, and after much testing, i can say you were correct!
i don't think the original cable was bad - it came from a working file-server,
but the scsi controller is newer, and i guess timming is everything.

thanks again,
	danny

}
}--
}Justin






To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30  6:12: 0 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from ashburn.skiltech.com (ashburn.skiltech.com [216.235.79.239])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1386637B4E0
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 06:11:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from minter@localhost)
	by ashburn.skiltech.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f0UEBfI63032;
	Tue, 30 Jan 2001 09:11:41 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from minter)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 09:11:41 -0500 (EST)
From: "H. Wade Minter" <minter@lunenburg.org>
X-X-Sender:  <minter@ashburn.skiltech.com>
To: <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Upgrading just bind
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0101300910380.62069-100000@ashburn.skiltech.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Probably an easy answer, but if I just wanted to upgrade bind without
upgrading the entire system, how would I do it.  I cvsup every night, and
rebuilt the entire system about two weeks ago, but that was right before
the bind exploit was announced.

Thanks,
Wade



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30  6:40:44 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from lucifer.ninth-circle.org (lucifer.bart.nl [194.158.168.74])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47B3037B4AB
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 06:40:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from asmodai@localhost)
	by lucifer.ninth-circle.org (8.11.1/8.11.0) id f0UEeK314022;
	Tue, 30 Jan 2001 15:40:20 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from asmodai)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 15:40:20 +0100
From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl>
To: "H. Wade Minter" <minter@lunenburg.org>
Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Upgrading just bind
Message-ID: <20010130154019.C13001@lucifer.bart.nl>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0101300910380.62069-100000@ashburn.skiltech.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0101300910380.62069-100000@ashburn.skiltech.com>; from minter@lunenburg.org on Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 09:11:41AM -0500
Organisation: VIA Net.Works The Netherlands
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

-On [20010130 15:15], H. Wade Minter (minter@lunenburg.org) wrote:
>Probably an easy answer, but if I just wanted to upgrade bind without
>upgrading the entire system, how would I do it.  I cvsup every night, and
>rebuilt the entire system about two weeks ago, but that was right before
>the bind exploit was announced.

Currently that requires a bunch of loops to jump through, which I am
solving right now.

Try building libisc before anything else at least.

-- 
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven          VIA Net.Works The Netherlands
BSD: Technical excellence at its best  Network- and systemadministrator
	  D78D D0AD 244D 1D12 C9CA  7152 035C 1138 546A B867
Misery loves company...


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30  6:52:28 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from lucifer.ninth-circle.org (lucifer.bart.nl [194.158.168.74])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0F6137B491
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 06:52:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from asmodai@localhost)
	by lucifer.ninth-circle.org (8.11.1/8.11.0) id f0UEq2614218;
	Tue, 30 Jan 2001 15:52:02 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from asmodai)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 15:52:02 +0100
From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl>
To: Shawn Barnhart <swb@grasslake.net>
Cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: BIND 8.2.3 into RELENG_3?
Message-ID: <20010130155202.E13001@lucifer.bart.nl>
References: <007f01c08a0c$d6518040$340410ac@JRAFTERY> <20010129171558.L88275@lucifer.bart.nl> <001501c08a1c$78da3e60$340410ac@JRAFTERY> <20010130101623.C8263@lucifer.bart.nl> <007c01c08aca$e8d1bbe0$b8209fc0@marlowe>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <007c01c08aca$e8d1bbe0$b8209fc0@marlowe>; from swb@grasslake.net on Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 08:42:45AM -0600
Organisation: VIA Net.Works The Netherlands
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

[sorry to cc: this back to the list, but these are the types of
questions which get frequently asked I guess]

-On [20010130 15:45], Shawn Barnhart (swb@grasslake.net) wrote:
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven" <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl>
>
>> Due to some source changes and resulting hackery which I am now trying
>> to clean up I'd advise people to use at least make buildworld for
>> building the new BIND and not try it by hand unless you know what you
>> are doing. =-P
>
>Speaking of doing it by hand, is it possible to just cd
>/usr/src/contrib/bind and do a make && make install to get bind updated, or
>is it necessary to build world?  I'd presume its always advisable to make
>world, but necessary?  I'm referring specifically to 4-STABLE in this case.

None of the sources in contrib should be made from that directory, their
just a source holder.

The make process uses directories such as src/usr.sbin/named to pull in
the sources from contrib to build them.

-- 
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven          VIA Net.Works The Netherlands
BSD: Technical excellence at its best  Network- and systemadministrator
	  D78D D0AD 244D 1D12 C9CA  7152 035C 1138 546A B867
Misery loves company...


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30  7:13:53 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.merrion.nua.net (mail.merrion.nua.net [195.7.46.14])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7933C37B491
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 07:13:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from thoth (cerberus.merrion.nua.net [195.7.46.125])
	by mail.merrion.nua.net (8.10.1/8.10.1) with SMTP id f0UFA6o35975;
	Tue, 30 Jan 2001 15:10:06 GMT
From: Tony Byrne <tony@nua.ie>
To: Andrew J Caines <A.J.Caines@altavista.net>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: syslogd throwing a hissy fit
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 15:17:57 +0000
Organization: Nua Ltd.
Message-ID: <4mmd7tkja6j4j8qfhmidddi108eg188t2h@4ax.com>
References: <s7hu6torq3c79usoqpgig3b56gg9d5n6jr@4ax.com> <20010124223705.A92362@gosset.maths.tcd.ie> <5qou6tkiba9jk6nbjepe9hn2g45hq560ep@4ax.com> <20010121021039.A442@hal9000.bsdonline.org> <7q9u6t0tkj5ktplad6k8468koar3j8jvi9@4ax.com> <s7hu6torq3c79usoqpgig3b56gg9d5n6jr@4ax.com> <20010124223705.A92362@gosset.maths.tcd.ie> <20010128162429.A412@hal9000.bsdonline.org> <alma7t4noj9u417v4t026fuuffkoflhf75@4ax.com> <20010129180459.D372@hal9000.bsdonline.org>
In-Reply-To: <20010129180459.D372@hal9000.bsdonline.org>
X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>Thanks for submitting the PR. I'd like to see it if you don't mind =
digging
>up the reference.

Here you go:

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D24704

or raw:

>Number:         24704
>Category:       bin
>Synopsis:       syslog produces repeated corrupt messages to =
/dev/console under certain circumstances
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    freebsd-bugs
>State:          open
>Quarter:       =20
>Keywords:      =20
>Date-Required: =20
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Sun Jan 28 13:20:01 PST 2001
>Closed-Date:   =20
>Last-Modified: =20
>Originator:     Tony Byrne
>Release:        4.2-STABLE
>Organization:
Nua Ltd.
>Environment:
=46reeBSD cerberus.merrion.nua.net 4.2-STABLE FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE #0: Wed
Jan 24 15:45:09 GMT 2001
tony@cerberus.merrion.nua.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CERBERUS  i386
>Description:
Under certain circumstances, syslogd will quickly and repeatedly fill
/dev/console with corrupt log output.  Messages are output at a rate of
tens per second.  Whenever syslogd exhibits this behaviour, it consumes
a large slice of CPU time.  An example of this output is:

4 23:17:23 cerberus /kernel: Jan 24 23:17:23 cerberus /kernel: Jan 24
23:17:23 cerberus /kernel: Jan 24 23:17:23 cerberus /kernel: Jan 24
23:17:23 cerberus /kernel: Jan 24 23:17:23 cerberus /kernel: Jan 24
23:17:23 cerberus /kernel: Jan 24 23:17:23 cerberus /kernel: Jan 24
23:17:23 cerberus /kernel: Jan 24 23:17:23 cerberus /kernel: Jan 24
23:17:23 cerberus /kernel: Jan 24 23:17:23 cerberus /kernel: Jan 24
23:17:23 cerberus syslogd: restart

These messsages appear on the console without line breaks and without
any meaningful log content.

The problem seems to be connected with the newly added LOG_CONSOLE
facility (MFC'd recently from CURRENT).  It occurs whenever
/etc/syslog.conf contains an entry that causes log messages with the
LOG_CONSOLE facility to be directed to /dev/console.  A typical example
of a triggering syslog.conf entry would be:

*.*                 /dev/console


>How-To-Repeat:
1) Edit /etc/syslog.conf

2) Insert the line:
   *.*                /dev/console
   near the top of the file.

3) Restart syslogd
>Fix:
Ensure that syslog.conf does not use wildcards in such a way that
messages with the LOG_CONSOLE facility are directed to /dev/console.

The syslogd.c source file seems to include code to prevent this
particular problem from arising, but it appears to be broken.

>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:

Regards,

Tony.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30  7:28:55 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from ns.yogotech.com (ns.yogotech.com [206.127.123.66])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C29FC37B4EC; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 07:28:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nomad.yogotech.com (nomad.yogotech.com [206.127.123.131])
	by ns.yogotech.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA05004;
	Tue, 30 Jan 2001 08:28:28 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from nate@nomad.yogotech.com)
Received: (from nate@localhost)
	by nomad.yogotech.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA06593;
	Tue, 30 Jan 2001 08:28:28 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from nate)
From: Nate Williams <nate@yogotech.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <14966.56732.156003.558368@nomad.yogotech.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 08:28:28 -0700 (MST)
To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
Cc: Gregory Neil Shapiro <gshapiro@FreeBSD.ORG>,
	Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: BIND 8.2.3 upgrade available
In-Reply-To: <20010129164711.K26076@fw.wintelcom.net>
References: <20010129143300.A38419@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<20010129153144.H26076@fw.wintelcom.net>
	<14966.3324.107528.104198@horsey.gshapiro.net>
	<20010129164711.K26076@fw.wintelcom.net>
X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid
Reply-To: nate@yogotech.com (Nate Williams)
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> * Gregory Neil Shapiro <gshapiro@FreeBSD.ORG> [010129 16:38] wrote:
> > bright> Is there any chance that the bind and sendmail people could backport
> > bright> -DNO_SENDMAIL and -DNO_NAMED to 3.x (and maybe 2.x)?
> > 
> > What does the BIND bug have to do with sendmail?
> 
> It was related in that, the sendmail and bind shipped with 2.2.x
> and 3.x is pretty bad, and upgrades shouldn't get clobbered by make
> world in case there's a system change.
> 
> It's nice to be able to clobber the /usr instead of installing into
> /usr/local for older versions of FreeBSD.

Why?  I've got a number of 2.x/3.x systems, and it's trivial just to
stick them in /usr/local.


Nate


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30  7:32:55 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from bakhtin.amt.ru (station120.amt.ru [212.111.64.120])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC5A837B65D
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 07:32:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from bakhtin@localhost)
	by bakhtin.amt.ru (8.11.0/8.11.1) id f0UFWHE80707;
	Tue, 30 Jan 2001 18:32:17 +0300 (MSK)
	(envelope-from bakhtin)
X-Comment-To: Honda Hirotaka
To: Honda Hirotaka <hrtk@kt.rim.or.jp>
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: can't make buildworld on yesterday's stable
References: <87ofwpnp3i.fsf@bakhtin.amt.ru> <20010130.224855.74755432.hrtk@kt.rim.or.jp>
Organization: AMT Group
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 1.5)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
From: Alex Bakhtin <bakhtin@amt.ru>
Date: 30 Jan 2001 18:32:17 +0300
In-Reply-To: Honda Hirotaka's message of "Tue, 30 Jan 2001 22:48:55 +0900 (JST)"
Message-ID: <87d7d5nji6.fsf@bakhtin.amt.ru>
Lines: 20
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.45/XEmacs 21.1 - "Channel Islands"
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>>>>> "HH" == Honda Hirotaka writes:
Honda,

HH> Is it complaining about the PCVT_SCANSET option of your kernel config
HH> file ?

	I'm trying to buildworld, not to buildcernel:) However, I have
tried to remove this line from my lint, it doesn't help. Sure I can edit
the proper header file, but I don't like to put hacks into the code:)

>> In file included from ioctl.c:108:
>> >/mnt/export/src/usr.bin/kdump/../../sys/i386/isa/pcvt/pcvt_hdr.h:250: #error "Supported keyboard scancode sets are 1 and 2 only (for now)!!!"

HH> (in LINT)
HH> # This PCVT option is for keyboards such as those used on IBM ThinkPad laptops
HH> options 	PCVT_SCANSET=2 		# IBM keyboards are non-std

-- 
Best regards, -- Alex Bakhtin.
AMT Group, Cisco Systems Gold Partner, http://www.amt.ru


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30  8:10:56 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.clones.com (unknown [216.70.178.182])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0943D37B67D
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 08:10:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (gross@localhost)
	by mail.clones.com (8.11.0/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f0UGAxg09084;
	Tue, 30 Jan 2001 08:10:59 -0800
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 08:10:59 -0800 (PST)
From: Glendon Gross <gross@clones.com>
To: "Eric K. Wolven" <wyrdwulf@catskill.net>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: /dev/mixer
In-Reply-To: <20010130055830.10a881cf.wyrdwulf@catskill.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.20.0101300810410.9075-100000@mail.clones.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


Have you tried "./MAKEDEV snd0" ?

On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Eric K. Wolven wrote:

> Hello:
> 
> I installed the aumix-gtk port but I get an error message: "/dev/mixer no such file or directory found".
> 
> I get the same message under "/usr/sbin/mixer".
> I've run "cd /dev  ./MAKEDEV all" but no luck with /dev/mixer.
> 
> Any suggestions?
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Eric
> 
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
> 



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30  8:14:26 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from lucifer.ninth-circle.org (lucifer.bart.nl [194.158.168.74])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D74D37B491
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 08:14:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from asmodai@localhost)
	by lucifer.ninth-circle.org (8.11.1/8.11.0) id f0UGE7p16040
	for stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 17:14:07 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from asmodai)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 17:14:07 +0100
From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai@freebsd.org>
To: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: BIND 8.2.3 and 3-STABLE
Message-ID: <20010130171407.K13001@lucifer.bart.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Organisation: VIA Net.Works The Netherlands
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

I am currently resolving the last problem so it might be that you people
who are in a hurry to upgrade their box need to make libisc
[src/lib/libisc] by hand.

Apologies.  *back to hacking*

-- 
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven          VIA Net.Works The Netherlands
BSD: Technical excellence at its best  Network- and systemadministrator
	  D78D D0AD 244D 1D12 C9CA  7152 035C 1138 546A B867
Misery loves company...


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30  8:43:11 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from point.osg.gov.bc.ca (point.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.102.44])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9E1BB37B503; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 08:42:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by point.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.8.7/8.8.8) id IAA29125;
	Tue, 30 Jan 2001 08:42:46 -0800
Received: from passer.osg.gov.bc.ca(142.32.110.29)
 via SMTP by point.osg.gov.bc.ca, id smtpda29123; Tue Jan 30 08:42:29 2001
Received: (from uucp@localhost)
	by passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.11.2/8.9.1) id f0UGgOD30939;
	Tue, 30 Jan 2001 08:42:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cwsys9.cwsent.com(10.2.2.1), claiming to be "cwsys.cwsent.com"
 via SMTP by passer9.cwsent.com, id smtpdG30925; Tue Jan 30 08:42:05 2001
Received: (from uucp@localhost)
	by cwsys.cwsent.com (8.11.2/8.9.1) id f0UGg5S27339;
	Tue, 30 Jan 2001 08:42:05 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200101301642.f0UGg5S27339@cwsys.cwsent.com>
Received: from localhost.cwsent.com(127.0.0.1), claiming to be "cwsys"
 via SMTP by localhost.cwsent.com, id smtpdu27275; Tue Jan 30 08:41:45 2001
Reply-To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca>
From: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca>
X-Sender: schubert
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: CONNER CFP1080 Filesystem Corruption
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 08:41:44 -0800
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

I just submitted a PR and patch in kern/24740 to fix a tagged queueing
related filesystem corruption problem on CONNER CFP1080 drives.  The
patch adds an entry to the xpt_quirk_tabke.  Anyone willing to commit
this for me?


Regards,                         Phone:  (250)387-8437
Cy Schubert                        Fax:  (250)387-5766
Team Leader, Sun/Alpha Team   Internet:  Cy.Schubert@osg.gov.bc.ca
Open Systems Group, ITSD, ISTA
Province of BC            


------- Forwarded Message

[headers removed]
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 08:30:01 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200101301630.f0UGU1V98029@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca
From: gnats-admin@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: kern/24740: CONNER CFP1080 Tagged Queueing Filesystem Corruption
Reply-To: gnats-admin@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: Your message of Tue, 30 Jan 2001 08:28:12 -0800 (PST)
	<200101301628.f0UGSCh11615@cwsys.cwsent.com>
Sender: gnats@FreeBSD.org
Resent-To: cy@passer.osg.gov.bc.ca
Resent-Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 08:31:20 -0800
Resent-From: Cy Schubert <cschuber@osg.gov.bc.ca>

Thank you very much for your problem report.
It has the internal identification `kern/24740'.
The individual assigned to look at your
report is: freebsd-bugs. 

You can access the state of your problem report at any time
via this link:

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=24740

>Category:       kern
>Responsible:    freebsd-bugs
>Synopsis:       filesystem corruption CFP1080 CAM SCSI cam_xpt.c
>Arrival-Date:   Tue Jan 30 08:30:01 PST 2001

------- End of Forwarded Message



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30  9:24:12 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from panzer.kdm.org (panzer.kdm.org [216.160.178.169])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C558A37B491; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 09:23:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from ken@localhost)
	by panzer.kdm.org (8.9.3/8.9.1) id KAA23065;
	Tue, 30 Jan 2001 10:22:12 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from ken)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 10:22:12 -0700
From: "Kenneth D. Merry" <ken@kdm.org>
To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: CONNER CFP1080 Filesystem Corruption
Message-ID: <20010130102212.A23045@panzer.kdm.org>
References: <200101301642.f0UGg5S27339@cwsys.cwsent.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
In-Reply-To: <200101301642.f0UGg5S27339@cwsys.cwsent.com>; from Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca on Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 08:41:44AM -0800
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 08:41:44 -0800, Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote:
> I just submitted a PR and patch in kern/24740 to fix a tagged queueing
> related filesystem corruption problem on CONNER CFP1080 drives.  The
> patch adds an entry to the xpt_quirk_tabke.  Anyone willing to commit
> this for me?

I'll handle it.  See my reply to the PR.

Ken
-- 
Kenneth Merry
ken@kdm.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30 10: 0:56 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from entropy.mx (CC2-2464.charter-stl.com [24.217.121.178])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54E0337B491
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 10:00:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from ajh3@localhost)
	by entropy.mx (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f0UI04X59294;
	Tue, 30 Jan 2001 12:00:04 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from ajh3)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 12:00:04 -0600
From: Andrew Hesford <ajh3@chmod.ath.cx>
To: Alex Bakhtin <bakhtin@amt.ru>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: can't make buildworld on yesterday's stable
Message-ID: <20010130120004.A59267@cec.wustl.edu>
References: <87ofwpnp3i.fsf@bakhtin.amt.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <87ofwpnp3i.fsf@bakhtin.amt.ru>; from bakhtin@amt.ru on Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 04:31:29PM +0300
X-Loop: Andrew Hesford
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

This has to be unique to your tree, because I cvsup'ed last night and
rebuilt the world with no troubles. It was a clean tree, too, since I
trashed my existing tree and wiped it out before the cvsup.

Maybe your connection timed out, or your mirror went bad. I use
cvsup15.freebsd.org, it seems pretty quick. I've not had any troubles
with them yet.

Best of luck.

On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 04:31:29PM +0300, Alex Bakhtin wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> 	I'm getting the following error when trying to compile yesterday's
> 	fbsd-stable:
> =========================
> cu.h: No such file or directory
> /mnt/export/src/usr.bin/kdump/../../sys/i386/isa/pcvt/pcvt_hdr.h:120: i386/isa/isa.h: No such file or directory
> In file included from ioctl.c:108:
> >/mnt/export/src/usr.bin/kdump/../../sys/i386/isa/pcvt/pcvt_hdr.h:250: #error "Supported keyboard scancode sets are 1 and 2 only (for now)!!!"
> In file included from ioctl.c:140:
> /mnt/export/src/usr.bin/kdump/../../sys/sys/kbio.h:47: warning: `KB_OTHER' redefined
> /mnt/export/src/usr.bin/kdump/../../sys/i386/isa/pcvt/pcvt_hdr.h:164: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
> In file included from ioctl.c:141:
> /mnt/export/src/usr.bin/kdump/../../sys/sys/memrange.h:18: warning: `MDF_ACTIVE' redefined
> /usr/obj/mnt/export/src/i386/usr/include/pccard/cardinfo.h:81: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
> In file included from ioctl.c:153:
> /mnt/export/src/usr.bin/kdump/../../sys/sys/wormio.h:102: warning: `CDRIOCBLANK' redefined
> /mnt/export/src/usr.bin/kdump/../../sys/sys/cdrio.h:59: warning: this is the location of the previous definition
> mkdep: compile failed
> *** Error code 1
> 
> Stop in /mnt/export/src/usr.bin/kdump.
> *** Error code 1
> 
> Stop in /mnt/export/src/usr.bin.
> =========================
> 
> 	It seems that there could be some problem with my tree? 
> 
> -- 
> Best regards, -- Alex Bakhtin.
> AMT Group, Cisco Systems Gold Partner, http://www.amt.ru
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

-- 
Andrew Hesford - ajh3@chmod.ath.cx
"355/113 -- Not the famous irrational number PI,
 but an incredible simulation!"


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30 10:16:23 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from earth.backplane.com (earth-nat-cw.backplane.com [208.161.114.67])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1311337B491
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 10:16:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from dillon@localhost)
	by earth.backplane.com (8.11.1/8.9.3) id f0UIFio88817;
	Tue, 30 Jan 2001 10:15:44 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dillon)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 10:15:44 -0800 (PST)
From: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>
Message-Id: <200101301815.f0UIFio88817@earth.backplane.com>
To: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl>
Cc: "H. Wade Minter" <minter@lunenburg.org>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Upgrading just bind
References: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0101300910380.62069-100000@ashburn.skiltech.com> <20010130154019.C13001@lucifer.bart.nl>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


:-On [20010130 15:15], H. Wade Minter (minter@lunenburg.org) wrote:
:>Probably an easy answer, but if I just wanted to upgrade bind without
:>upgrading the entire system, how would I do it.  I cvsup every night, and
:>rebuilt the entire system about two weeks ago, but that was right before
:>the bind exploit was announced.
:
:Currently that requires a bunch of loops to jump through, which I am
:solving right now.
:
:Try building libisc before anything else at least.
:
:-- 
:Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven          VIA Net.Works The Netherlands

    This is what I did:

    cvsup ...

    cd /usr/src/lib
    make obj
    make
    make install

    cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/named
    make obj
    make clean
    make
    make install

    I'm hoping it worked as expected.  It only takes a few minutes if you've
    built the world in the last few weeks.

					-Matt




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30 10:30:14 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from pit.databus.com (p101-45.acedsl.com [160.79.101.45])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 306A237B684
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 10:29:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from barney@localhost)
	by pit.databus.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f0UITRm08802;
	Tue, 30 Jan 2001 13:29:27 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from barney)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 13:29:27 -0500
From: Barney Wolff <barney@pit.databus.com>
To: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl>
Cc: "H. Wade Minter" <minter@lunenburg.org>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Upgrading just bind
Message-ID: <20010130132927.A8712@pit.databus.com>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0101300910380.62069-100000@ashburn.skiltech.com> <20010130154019.C13001@lucifer.bart.nl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20010130154019.C13001@lucifer.bart.nl>; from jruigrok@via-net-works.nl on Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 03:40:20PM +0100
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

I built and installed /usr/ports/net/bind9 with no problems on a
4.2 stable from 1/19/01.  It goes in /usr/local/sbin and works
just fine for me.  Command args are different and it's a bit
pickier about the zone files, but getting it running took only
a few minutes.  Added benefit is I can fall back without pain.

Barney Wolff

On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 03:40:20PM +0100, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
> -On [20010130 15:15], H. Wade Minter (minter@lunenburg.org) wrote:
> >Probably an easy answer, but if I just wanted to upgrade bind without
> >upgrading the entire system, how would I do it.  I cvsup every night, and
> >rebuilt the entire system about two weeks ago, but that was right before
> >the bind exploit was announced.
> 
> Currently that requires a bunch of loops to jump through, which I am
> solving right now.
> 
> Try building libisc before anything else at least.
> 
> -- 
> Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven          VIA Net.Works The Netherlands
> BSD: Technical excellence at its best  Network- and systemadministrator
> 	  D78D D0AD 244D 1D12 C9CA  7152 035C 1138 546A B867
> Misery loves company...
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30 11: 7:21 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from accord.grasslake.net (accord.grasslake.net [206.11.249.240])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27DA937B6AC
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 11:07:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from marlowe (accord.grasslake.net [206.11.249.240])
	by accord.grasslake.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f0UJ18m95207
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 13:01:08 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from swb@grasslake.net)
Message-ID: <009d01c08aef$f7640d00$b8209fc0@marlowe>
From: "Shawn Barnhart" <swb@grasslake.net>
To: <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0101300910380.62069-100000@ashburn.skiltech.com> <20010130154019.C13001@lucifer.bart.nl> <20010130132927.A8712@pit.databus.com>
Subject: Re: Upgrading just bind
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 13:08:01 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


----- Original Message -----
From: "Barney Wolff" <barney@pit.databus.com>

> I built and installed /usr/ports/net/bind9 with no problems on a
> 4.2 stable from 1/19/01.  It goes in /usr/local/sbin and works
> just fine for me.  Command args are different and it's a bit
> pickier about the zone files, but getting it running took only
> a few minutes.  Added benefit is I can fall back without pain.

Speaking of bind9, are there any plans to replace bind8 with bind9 in the
core FreeBSD system, or is 9 considered still too new?  I understand that
8.2.3 fixes the current round of security bugs, but reading the ISC web site
I get the impression they're pushing the 9.x series over the 8 series.

My own understanding is that 9.x is a major improvement in codebase (as in
total rewrite) over the 8.x series, but I imagine if I'm wrong someone will
correct me...




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30 11:17:52 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from vimfuego.saarinen.org (saarinen.org [203.79.82.14])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E6FB37B6AD
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 11:17:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vimfuego.saarinen.org ([192.168.1.1] ident=foobar)
	by vimfuego.saarinen.org with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 14NgHG-0007rB-00
	for stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 08:17:18 +1300
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 08:17:18 +1300 (NZDT)
From: Juha Saarinen <juha@saarinen.org>
To: <stable@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Upgrading just bind
In-Reply-To: <009d01c08aef$f7640d00$b8209fc0@marlowe>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0101310816030.27803-100000@vimfuego.saarinen.org>
X-S: Always
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

And if you wanted to replace 8.2.3 with 9.1 (from ports), what would be
the procedure?

-- 
Regards,


Juha

PGP fingerprint:
B7E1 CC52 5FCA 9756 B502  10C8 4CD8 B066 12F3 9544

On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Shawn Barnhart wrote:

>
> Speaking of bind9, are there any plans to replace bind8 with bind9 in the
> core FreeBSD system, or is 9 considered still too new?  I understand that
> 8.2.3 fixes the current round of security bugs, but reading the ISC web site
> I get the impression they're pushing the 9.x series over the 8 series.
>
> My own understanding is that 9.x is a major improvement in codebase (as in
> total rewrite) over the 8.x series, but I imagine if I'm wrong someone will
> correct me...



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30 11:22:31 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from peitho.fxp.org (peitho.fxp.org [209.26.95.40])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5740637B6AA
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 11:22:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: by peitho.fxp.org (Postfix, from userid 1501)
	id 0035913613; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 14:22:09 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 14:22:09 -0500
From: Chris Faulhaber <jedgar@fxp.org>
To: Juha Saarinen <juha@saarinen.org>
Cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Upgrading just bind
Message-ID: <20010130142209.G26095@peitho.fxp.org>
References: <009d01c08aef$f7640d00$b8209fc0@marlowe> <Pine.LNX.4.31.0101310816030.27803-100000@vimfuego.saarinen.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0101310816030.27803-100000@vimfuego.saarinen.org>; from juha@saarinen.org on Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 08:17:18AM +1300
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 08:17:18AM +1300, Juha Saarinen wrote:
> And if you wanted to replace 8.2.3 with 9.1 (from ports), what would be
> the procedure?
> 

Read the Migration Notes from the bind9 tarball
(bind-9.1.0/doc/misc/migration).

-- 
Chris D. Faulhaber - jedgar@fxp.org - jedgar@FreeBSD.org
--------------------------------------------------------
FreeBSD: The Power To Serve   -   http://www.FreeBSD.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30 12:12:34 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from vimfuego.saarinen.org (saarinen.org [203.79.82.14])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8799437B491
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 12:12:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vimfuego.saarinen.org ([192.168.1.1] ident=foobar)
	by vimfuego.saarinen.org with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 14Nh8M-0007sv-00; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 09:12:10 +1300
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 09:12:10 +1300 (NZDT)
From: Juha Saarinen <juha@saarinen.org>
To: Chris Faulhaber <jedgar@fxp.org>
Cc: "stable@freebsd.org" <stable@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: Upgrading just bind
In-Reply-To: <20010130142209.G26095@peitho.fxp.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0101310904540.27803-100000@vimfuego.saarinen.org>
X-S: Always
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Thanks, but that's not what I meant. I would like to remove the older BIND
binaries etc, and replace them with 9.1 ones.

I see what happened now... the 9.1 files went into /usr/local/sbin. No
worries.

-- 
Regards,


Juha

PGP fingerprint:
B7E1 CC52 5FCA 9756 B502  10C8 4CD8 B066 12F3 9544

On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Chris Faulhaber wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 08:17:18AM +1300, Juha Saarinen wrote:
> > And if you wanted to replace 8.2.3 with 9.1 (from ports), what would be
> > the procedure?
> >
>
> Read the Migration Notes from the bind9 tarball
> (bind-9.1.0/doc/misc/migration).
>
>



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30 12:16:11 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from hlmailer.hilliard.com (unknown [198.184.127.28])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BFDC37B491
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 12:15:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hilliard.com ([198.184.69.76]) by hlmailer.hilliard.com
          (Netscape Messaging Server 3.6)  with ESMTP id AAA55A2
          for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 15:14:33 -0500
Message-ID: <3A7720D0.9D15EE82@hilliard.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 15:15:12 -0500
From: "Harpe, Mike" <MHarpe@hilliard.com>
Organization: Hilliard-Lyons, Inc.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: HELP! Can't build libbind from cvsup today...
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

I was doing a make buildworld to roll in the new BIND and the following
happened...

===> libbind
cc -O -pipe
-I/usr/src/lib/libbind/../../contrib/bind/port/freebsd/include
-I/usr/src/lib/libbind/../../contrib/bind/include -DHMAC_MD5 -DUSE_MD5
-I/usr/obj/usr/src/tmp/usr/include -c
/usr/src/lib/libbind/../../contrib/bind/lib/irs/dns.c -o dns.o
In file included from
/usr/src/lib/libbind/../../contrib/bind/lib/irs/dns.c:42:
/usr/src/lib/libbind/../../contrib/bind/port/freebsd/include/port_after.h:2:
unterminated `#if' conditional
*** Error code 1

Any ideas?  I cvsup'ed against a fresh source tree today.

Mike Harpe
Hilliard-Lyons, Inc.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30 12:45:59 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from dt051n37.san.rr.com (dt051n37.san.rr.com [204.210.32.55])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3D0E37B69E
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 12:45:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from slave (Studded@slave [10.0.0.1])
	by dt051n37.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA98488;
	Tue, 30 Jan 2001 12:45:33 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from DougB@gorean.org)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 12:45:32 -0800 (PST)
From: Doug Barton <DougB@gorean.org>
X-X-Sender:  <doug@dt051n37.san.rr.com>
To: "H. Wade Minter" <minter@lunenburg.org>
Cc: <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: Upgrading just bind
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0101300910380.62069-100000@ashburn.skiltech.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.32.0101301244110.98124-100000@dt051n37.san.rr.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, H. Wade Minter wrote:

> Probably an easy answer, but if I just wanted to upgrade bind without
> upgrading the entire system, how would I do it.

	You don't. :) Just build the whole system, you'll be better off.

>  I cvsup every night,

	You really shouldn't do that. It's always better to have your
sources match your current system. That way if you need to rebuild a
kernel or something, you don't have to worry about conflicts.

Good luck,

Doug
-- 
    "Pain heals. Chicks dig scars. Glory . . . lasts forever."
        -- Keanu Reeves as Shane Falco in "The Replacements"

	Do YOU Yahoo!?




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30 16:49:23 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from awww.jeah.net (awww.jeah.net [216.111.239.130])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD53037B6A7
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 16:48:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from root@localhost)
	by awww.jeah.net (8.11.1/8.11.0) id f0V0mMP76125
	for stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 18:48:22 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from chris)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 18:48:22 -0600 (CST)
From: Chris Byrnes <chris@awww.jeah.net>
Message-Id: <200101310048.f0V0mMP76125@awww.jeah.net>
To: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: bind upgrade
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

in /usr/src/usr.sbin/named

I.    -o named tmp_version.o db_dump.o db_load.o db_lookup.o db_save.o db_update.o db_glue.o db_ixfr.o db_sec.o db_tsig.o ns_parser.o ns_lexer.o ns_parseutil.o ns_ctl.o ns_forw.o ns_init.o ns_main.o ns_maint.o ns_req.o ns_resp.o ns_stats.o ns_ncache.o ns_xfr.o ns_glue.o ns_udp.o ns_config.o ns_update.o ns_ixfr.o ns_signal.o ns_sort.o ns_notify.o  /usr/obj/usr/src/usr.sbin/named/../../lib/libbind/libbind.a /usr/obj/usr/src/usr.sbin/named/../../lib/libisc/libisc.a
ns_forw.o: In function `ns_forw':
ns_forw.o(.text+0x55f): undefined reference to `__res_pquery'
ns_forw.o: In function `retry':
ns_forw.o(.text+0x17e0): undefined reference to `__res_pquery'
ns_forw.o(.text+0x19af): undefined reference to `__res_pquery'
ns_maint.o: In function `endxfer':
ns_maint.o(.text+0x281b): undefined reference to `isc_movefile'
ns_maint.o(.text+0x28c8): undefined reference to `isc_movefile'
ns_req.o: In function `ns_req':
ns_req.o(.text+0x812): undefined reference to `__res_pquery'
ns_resp.o: In function `ns_resp':
ns_resp.o(.text+0x1187): undefined reference to `__res_pquery'
ns_resp.o(.text+0x2e06): undefined reference to `__res_pquery'
ns_resp.o: In function `send_msg':
ns_resp.o(.text+0x4891): undefined reference to `__res_pquery'
ns_resp.o: In function `sysquery':
ns_resp.o(.text+0x52b1): undefined reference to `__res_pquery'
ns_xfr.o(.text+0x652): more undefined references to `__res_pquery' follow
ns_update.o: In function `merge_logs':
ns_update.o(.text+0x3699): undefined reference to `isc_movefile'
ns_update.o: In function `zonedump':
ns_update.o(.text+0x4f84): undefined reference to `isc_movefile'
ns_update.o(.text+0x5002): undefined reference to `isc_movefile'
ns_update.o(.text+0x5097): undefined reference to `isc_movefile'
ns_update.o(.text+0x50d1): undefined reference to `isc_movefile'
ns_update.o(.text+0x510e): more undefined references to `isc_movefile' follow
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/src/usr.sbin/named.

any ideas?


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30 17:56: 4 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.242.29])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP
	id BDB3837B6A2; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 17:55:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: From
	notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au ([129.94.211.34] == elephant.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU)
	(for <matthias.andree@stud.uni-dortmund.de>)
	(for <gharris@flashcom.net>) (for <msmith@freebsd.org>)
	(for <ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de>)
	(for <nfs@lists.sourceforge.net>) By note With Smtp ;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 12:55:28 +1100 
Received: from neilb by notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 14NmUZ-0004z7-00; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 12:55:27 +1100
From: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
To: Matthias Andree <matthias.andree@stud.uni-dortmund.de>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 12:55:27 +1100 (EST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <14967.28815.387591.944015@notabene.cse.unsw.edu.au>
Cc: Guy Harris <gharris@flashcom.net>,
	Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org>,
	Matthias Andree <ma@dt.e-technik.uni-dortmund.de>,
	Linux NFS mailing list <nfs@lists.sourceforge.net>,
	FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: [NFS] Incompatible: FreeBSD 4.2 client, Linux 2.2.18 nfsv3 server, read-only export
In-Reply-To: message from Matthias Andree on Thursday January 25
References: <200101241104.f0OB4sS10071@mass.dis.org>
	<200101241117.f0OBH7S10154@mass.dis.org>
	<20010124104216.F344@quadrajet.flashcom.com>
	<20010124105703.G344@quadrajet.flashcom.com>
	<20010125011311.B12526@emma1.emma.line.org>
X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under Emacs 20.7.2
X-face:	[Gw_3E*Gng}4rRrKRYotwlE?.2|**#s9D<ml'fY1Vw+@XfR[fRCsUoP?K6bt3YD\ui5Fh?f
	LONpR';(ql)VM_TQ/<l_^D3~B:z$\YC7gUCuC=sYm/80G=$tt"98mr8(l))QzVKCk$6~gldn~*FK9x
	8`;pM{3S8679sP+MbP,72<3_PIH-$I&iaiIb|hV1d%cYg))BmI)AZ
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Thursday January 25, matthias.andree@stud.uni-dortmund.de wrote:
> On Wed, 24 Jan 2001, Guy Harris wrote:
> 
> > An alternative patch is
> 
> Has been posted to the Linux-kernel mailing list bei Neil B, and "mostly
> works". FreeBSD and Linux chat almost properly, but Linux does not
> report EXECUTE permissions though the exported directory is mode 1777.
> It does however return READ|LOOKUP which is sufficient for FreeBSD to do
> the ls.
> 

 From rfc1813:

         ACCESS3_EXECUTE
            Execute file (no meaning for a directory).

So we never return EXECUTE permission on a directory. LOOKUP should be
sufficient.

NeilBrown

> -- 
> Matthias Andree
> 
> _______________________________________________
> NFS maillist  -  NFS@lists.sourceforge.net
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nfs


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30 19:18:39 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from horsey.gshapiro.net (horsey.gshapiro.net [209.220.147.178])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A807237B503
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 19:18:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from gshapiro@localhost)
	by horsey.gshapiro.net (8.12.0.Beta0/8.12.0.Beta0) id f0V3IJYb013726;
	Tue, 30 Jan 2001 19:18:19 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <14967.33787.860615.192886@horsey.gshapiro.net>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 19:18:19 -0800
From: Gregory Neil Shapiro <gshapiro@FreeBSD.ORG>
To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: BIND 8.2.3 upgrade available
In-Reply-To: <20010129164711.K26076@fw.wintelcom.net>
References: <20010129143300.A38419@xor.obsecurity.org>
	<20010129153144.H26076@fw.wintelcom.net>
	<14966.3324.107528.104198@horsey.gshapiro.net>
	<20010129164711.K26076@fw.wintelcom.net>
X-Mailer: VM 6.90 under 21.2  (beta42) "Poseidon" XEmacs Lucid
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>>>>> "bright" == Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net> writes:

bright> * Gregory Neil Shapiro <gshapiro@FreeBSD.ORG> [010129 16:38] wrote:
bright> Is there any chance that the bind and sendmail people could backport
bright> -DNO_SENDMAIL and -DNO_NAMED to 3.x (and maybe 2.x)?
>> 
>> What does the BIND bug have to do with sendmail?

bright> It was related in that, the sendmail and bind shipped with 2.2.x
bright> and 3.x is pretty bad, and upgrades shouldn't get clobbered by make
bright> world in case there's a system change.

bright> It's nice to be able to clobber the /usr instead of installing into
bright> /usr/local for older versions of FreeBSD.

Judging by:

http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/usr.sbin/Makefile?rev=RELENG_3&content-type=text/x-cvsweb-markup

3.X already has NO_SENDMAIL and NO_BIND.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30 19:21:48 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from sgi04-e.std.COM (sgi04-e.std.com [199.172.62.134])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 100AE37B699
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 19:21:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from world.std.com (world-f.std.com [199.172.62.5])
	by sgi04-e.std.COM (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id WAA2875777
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 22:21:27 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from kwc@localhost)
	by world.std.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id WAA11024;
	Tue, 30 Jan 2001 22:21:24 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 22:21:24 -0500 (EST)
From: Kenneth W Cochran <kwc@world.std.com>
Message-Id: <200101310321.WAA11024@world.std.com>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: XFree86-4.0.2 problems, 4.2-stable
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hi,

I'm trying to change XFree86 from 3.3.6 to 4.0.2.
OS is FreeBSD 4.2-stable, as of 29 January 2001.

I'm encountering the following problems so far:

1.  Fvwm95-2.0.43a - Start/popup menus don't work (they worked
    Just Fine in 3.3.6).  I'm getting the following error
    message in the log:

Fvwm-95: in function popup_func: <<ERROR>> No such menu StartMenu 4 -26

2.  Netscape Communicator 4.76:  Forward & backward navigation
    key sequences don't work (alt+leftarrow/alt+rightarrow).
    Alt+letter(s) (Reload, Close, New browser window) work
    fine.  In XFree86-3.3.6, the "windows-logo" key was working
    as the "alt" key (& the forward & back arrows worked),
    but in 4.0.2 we're back to the "real" alt-key.  Note that
    this is an a.out binary running on an ELF system, with
    a.out libraries from XFree86-3.3.3.  IIUC, Netscape does
    its own keyboard mapping, but isn't there some way to
    adjust or customize this?  I can't find anything helpful
    in Netscape's support-site.

    The recent Security Advisory (FreeBSD-SA-01:07) mentions
    that the BSD/OS ELF binary of Netscape works; where is that
    available?  It is not in ports/packages.  (And do things
    such as license terms allow its use on FreeBSD?)

3.  I get the following message in the log, apparently when
    changing between the X-desktop & a regular console:

(WW) fcntl(7, F_SETOWN): Inappropriate ioctl for device

Any suggestions as to how to fix these?
Naturally, FAQ, -doc & other resource pointers are quite welcome. :)
I've been searching archives at both FreeBSD & XFree86 and
have not yet found anything useful here.  :-/

Many thanks,

-kc


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30 19:37:56 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from obsecurity.org (adsl-64-169-104-72.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.169.104.72])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D9C237B6A0
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 19:37:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: by obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id D46C9BA2B4; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 19:38:04 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 19:38:04 -0800
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: Shawn Barnhart <swb@grasslake.net>
Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Upgrading just bind
Message-ID: <20010130193804.A55110@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0101300910380.62069-100000@ashburn.skiltech.com> <20010130154019.C13001@lucifer.bart.nl> <20010130132927.A8712@pit.databus.com> <009d01c08aef$f7640d00$b8209fc0@marlowe>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9amGYk9869ThD9tj"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <009d01c08aef$f7640d00$b8209fc0@marlowe>; from swb@grasslake.net on Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 01:08:01PM -0600
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


--9amGYk9869ThD9tj
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 01:08:01PM -0600, Shawn Barnhart wrote:
>=20
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Barney Wolff" <barney@pit.databus.com>
>=20
> > I built and installed /usr/ports/net/bind9 with no problems on a
> > 4.2 stable from 1/19/01.  It goes in /usr/local/sbin and works
> > just fine for me.  Command args are different and it's a bit
> > pickier about the zone files, but getting it running took only
> > a few minutes.  Added benefit is I can fall back without pain.
>=20
> Speaking of bind9, are there any plans to replace bind8 with bind9 in the
> core FreeBSD system, or is 9 considered still too new?  I understand that
> 8.2.3 fixes the current round of security bugs, but reading the ISC web s=
ite
> I get the impression they're pushing the 9.x series over the 8 series.

Apparently ISC don't even run bind9 on their own DNS servers yet..go
figure :-)

Anyway, it's being looked at for importing into -current.

Kris
--9amGYk9869ThD9tj
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6d4icWry0BWjoQKURAg2oAKCB1VOi5A0PblgdzR0U0iUIOzNwhgCg9Kwr
2piK+7jLoBr8/IxkZCSzYVo=
=Y4g/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--9amGYk9869ThD9tj--


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30 19:39:23 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from obsecurity.org (adsl-64-169-104-72.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.169.104.72])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A58337B6A0
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 19:39:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 8253BBA2B4; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 19:39:36 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 19:39:36 -0800
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>
Cc: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl>,
	"H. Wade Minter" <minter@lunenburg.org>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Upgrading just bind
Message-ID: <20010130193936.B55110@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0101300910380.62069-100000@ashburn.skiltech.com> <20010130154019.C13001@lucifer.bart.nl> <200101301815.f0UIFio88817@earth.backplane.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="z6Eq5LdranGa6ru8"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <200101301815.f0UIFio88817@earth.backplane.com>; from dillon@earth.backplane.com on Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 10:15:44AM -0800
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


--z6Eq5LdranGa6ru8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 10:15:44AM -0800, Matt Dillon wrote:

>     This is what I did:
>=20
>     cvsup ...
>=20
>     cd /usr/src/lib
>     make obj
>     make
>     make install
>=20
>     cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/named
>     make obj
>     make clean
>     make
>     make install
>=20
>     I'm hoping it worked as expected.  It only takes a few minutes if you=
've
>     built the world in the last few weeks.

I don't think that covers it. For example, you missed
libexec/named-xfer (not relevant to the security vulnerability, but
may cause operational problems).

Kris


--z6Eq5LdranGa6ru8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6d4j3Wry0BWjoQKURAuFwAJ9+66XIwUE6f1K7Afv620mGjPTTIgCdGO9T
Mg63mHzQVeQ8nhgST08MkfU=
=69Ku
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--z6Eq5LdranGa6ru8--


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30 19:56:49 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (drugs.dv.isc.org [130.155.191.236])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F223437B6AF
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 19:56:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nominum.com (localhost.dv.isc.org [127.0.0.1])
	by drugs.dv.isc.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f0V3u7N29997;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 14:56:15 +1100 (EST)
	(envelope-from marka@nominum.com)
Message-Id: <200101310356.f0V3u7N29997@drugs.dv.isc.org>
To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Cc: Shawn Barnhart <swb@grasslake.net>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG
From: Mark.Andrews@nominum.com
Subject: Re: Upgrading just bind 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 30 Jan 2001 19:38:04 -0800."
             <20010130193804.A55110@xor.obsecurity.org> 
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 14:56:07 +1100
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


> 
> --9amGYk9869ThD9tj
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> 
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 01:08:01PM -0600, Shawn Barnhart wrote:
> >=20
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Barney Wolff" <barney@pit.databus.com>
> >=20
> > > I built and installed /usr/ports/net/bind9 with no problems on a
> > > 4.2 stable from 1/19/01.  It goes in /usr/local/sbin and works
> > > just fine for me.  Command args are different and it's a bit
> > > pickier about the zone files, but getting it running took only
> > > a few minutes.  Added benefit is I can fall back without pain.
> >=20
> > Speaking of bind9, are there any plans to replace bind8 with bind9 in the
> > core FreeBSD system, or is 9 considered still too new?  I understand that
> > 8.2.3 fixes the current round of security bugs, but reading the ISC web s=
> ite
> > I get the impression they're pushing the 9.x series over the 8 series.
> 
> Apparently ISC don't even run bind9 on their own DNS servers yet..go
> figure :-)

	Actually we run different servers at different times in the
	development cycles of the various releases. i.e. we guinea
	pig our own product.

	Most of the BIND 9 developers run BIND 9 on their own
	machines / networks.  The server on my development machine
	is BIND 9.2.0a1, the one my wife is using is BIND 9.1.0 and
	she in not tolerent of stuffups.

	Mark
	
> 
> Anyway, it's being looked at for importing into -current.
> 
> Kris
--
Mark Andrews, Nominum Inc.
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: Mark.Andrews@nominum.com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30 20: 6: 2 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from voyager.straynet.com (voyager.straynet.com [208.185.24.8])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7FC937B6A1
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 20:05:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: by voyager.straynet.com (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id C6BAA2068C; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 23:04:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by voyager.straynet.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B6DAA18C94; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 23:04:58 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 23:04:58 -0500 (EST)
From: Greg Prosser <greg@straynet.com>
X-Sender: xyst@voyager.straynet.com
Reply-To: Greg Prosser <greg@straynet.com>
To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Upgrading just bind
In-Reply-To: <20010130193936.B55110@xor.obsecurity.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101302302310.96751-100000@voyager.straynet.com>
X-Sysadmin-Nolife: True
X-BOFH: Yes
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

on Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Kris Kennaway babbled ..

;; >     cd /usr/src/lib
;; >     make obj
;; >     make
;; >     make install
;; > 
;; >     cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/named
;; >     make obj
;; >     make clean
;; >     make
;; >     make install
;;
;; I don't think that covers it. For example, you missed
;; libexec/named-xfer (not relevant to the security vulnerability, but
;; may cause operational problems).
;; 
;; Kris

So what is The Right Way to do this?

Running a make in /usr/src/contrib/bind fails because it can't find a
'bsd' directory in lib/ .. I guess I have to track down all my binaries
and build them in their places in the source tree? (make in
/usr/src/usr.sbin/named, named-xref, etc)

Also, making named by itself pukes with lib errors, I guess that would
dictate I have to rebuild some libs? Which ones?

-gp

-- 
.... ..   .  ... .     .       .   .     .
              g r e g @ s t r a y n e t . c o m
.-----.----.-----.-----. senior administrator, straynet online
|  _  |   _|  -__|  _  | network administrator, wen dot net
|___  |__| |_____|___  | efnet irc operator, irc.fasti.net
|_____|          |_____| icq: 10405504      /    aol im: xysters




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30 20:21:48 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from botbay.net (botbay.net [151.197.159.116])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11BF737B69E
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 20:21:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (wcampbel@localhost)
	by botbay.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f0V4LSm03734;
	Tue, 30 Jan 2001 23:21:28 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from wcampbel@botbay.net)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 23:21:27 -0500 (EST)
From: Walter Campbell <wcampbel@botbay.net>
To: Greg Prosser <greg@straynet.com>
Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Upgrading just bind
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101302302310.96751-100000@voyager.straynet.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101302317270.245-100000@botbay.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> Running a make in /usr/src/contrib/bind fails because it can't find a
> 'bsd' directory in lib/ .. I guess I have to track down all my binaries
> and build them in their places in the source tree? (make in
> /usr/src/usr.sbin/named, named-xref, etc)
> 
> Also, making named by itself pukes with lib errors, I guess that would
> dictate I have to rebuild some libs? Which ones?
> 
> -gp

lib/libisc
lib/libbind
usr.bin/dig
usr.bin/dnskeygen
usr.bin/dnsquery
usr.bin/host
usr.sbin/named
usr.sbin/ndc
usr.sbin/nslookup
usr.sbin/nsupdate
libexec/named-xfer

I BELIEVE that covers it all

-Walter Campbell
-ircd-hybrid developer



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30 20:34:52 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from obsecurity.org (adsl-64-169-104-72.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.169.104.72])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C86E437B503
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 20:34:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 7F9CCBA2B4; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 20:35:01 -0800 (PST)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 20:35:01 -0800
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: Greg Prosser <greg@straynet.com>
Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Upgrading just bind
Message-ID: <20010130203501.A55598@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <20010130193936.B55110@xor.obsecurity.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101302302310.96751-100000@voyager.straynet.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101302302310.96751-100000@voyager.straynet.com>; from greg@straynet.com on Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 11:04:58PM -0500
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


--yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 11:04:58PM -0500, Greg Prosser wrote:
> on Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Kris Kennaway babbled ..
>=20
> ;; >     cd /usr/src/lib
> ;; >     make obj
> ;; >     make
> ;; >     make install
> ;; >=20
> ;; >     cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/named
> ;; >     make obj
> ;; >     make clean
> ;; >     make
> ;; >     make install
> ;;
> ;; I don't think that covers it. For example, you missed
> ;; libexec/named-xfer (not relevant to the security vulnerability, but
> ;; may cause operational problems).
> ;;=20
> ;; Kris
>=20
> So what is The Right Way to do this?

'make buildworld' etc. Don't do anything else unless you can live with
the consequences of named being broken, or can fix it yourself.

Kris

--yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6d5X1Wry0BWjoQKURArtyAKDOhQkeR435AdTBUXevsTa9p2JgaACgm1Cc
QX15EkgOCGsC3CLOxyI/kzU=
=Ofk8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--yrj/dFKFPuw6o+aM--


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30 20:41:44 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mailhost01.reflexnet.net (mailhost01.reflexnet.net [64.6.192.82])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23B4837B698
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 20:41:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com ([216.196.73.168]) by mailhost01.reflexnet.net  with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.197.19);
	 Tue, 30 Jan 2001 20:39:29 -0800
Received: (from cjc@localhost)
	by rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f0V4fCV14528;
	Tue, 30 Jan 2001 20:41:12 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from cjc)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 20:41:12 -0800
From: "Crist J. Clark" <cjclark@reflexnet.net>
To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Cc: Greg Prosser <greg@straynet.com>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Upgrading just bind
Message-ID: <20010130204112.M91447@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex>
Reply-To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu
References: <20010130193936.B55110@xor.obsecurity.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101302302310.96751-100000@voyager.straynet.com> <20010130203501.A55598@xor.obsecurity.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i
In-Reply-To: <20010130203501.A55598@xor.obsecurity.org>; from kris@obsecurity.org on Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 08:35:01PM -0800
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 08:35:01PM -0800, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 11:04:58PM -0500, Greg Prosser wrote:
> > on Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Kris Kennaway babbled ..
> > 
> > ;; >     cd /usr/src/lib
> > ;; >     make obj
> > ;; >     make
> > ;; >     make install
> > ;; > 
> > ;; >     cd /usr/src/usr.sbin/named
> > ;; >     make obj
> > ;; >     make clean
> > ;; >     make
> > ;; >     make install
> > ;;
> > ;; I don't think that covers it. For example, you missed
> > ;; libexec/named-xfer (not relevant to the security vulnerability, but
> > ;; may cause operational problems).
> > ;; 
> > ;; Kris
> > 
> > So what is The Right Way to do this?
> 
> 'make buildworld' etc. Don't do anything else unless you can live with
> the consequences of named being broken, or can fix it yourself.

I am still a fan of,

  # cd /usr/ports/net/bind8
  # make PREFIX=/usr DESTETC=/etc/namedb install

To clobber everything with fresh, new-car-smell BIND.
-- 
Crist J. Clark                           cjclark@alum.mit.edu


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30 21:21:55 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from earth.backplane.com (earth-nat-cw.backplane.com [208.161.114.67])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91CE737B6A6
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 21:21:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from dillon@localhost)
	by earth.backplane.com (8.11.1/8.9.3) id f0V5LP200488;
	Tue, 30 Jan 2001 21:21:25 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dillon)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 21:21:25 -0800 (PST)
From: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>
Message-Id: <200101310521.f0V5LP200488@earth.backplane.com>
To: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
Cc: Greg Prosser <greg@straynet.com>,
	Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Upgrading just bind
References: <20010130193936.B55110@xor.obsecurity.org> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101302302310.96751-100000@voyager.straynet.com> <20010130203501.A55598@xor.obsecurity.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

:> ;; I don't think that covers it. For example, you missed
:> ;; libexec/named-xfer (not relevant to the security vulnerability, but
:> ;; may cause operational problems).
:> ;;=20
:> ;; Kris

    True, though named-xfer hasn't changed significantly in a long time.

					-Matt


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30 22:52:16 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from epsilon.lucida.ca (unknown [209.47.215.67])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 24E7437B65D
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 22:51:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 13980 invoked by uid 1000); 31 Jan 2001 06:51:53 -0000
Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 31 Jan 2001 06:51:53 -0000
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 01:51:51 -0500 (EST)
From: Matt Heckaman <matt@LUCIDA.CA>
To: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl>
Cc: "H. Wade Minter" <minter@lunenburg.org>, <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: Upgrading just bind
In-Reply-To: <20010130154019.C13001@lucifer.bart.nl>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0101310150140.13957-100000@epsilon.lucida.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
X-Spam-Rating: localhost 1.6.2 0/1000/N
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven wrote:
...
: Currently that requires a bunch of loops to jump through, which I am
: solving right now.
:
: Try building libisc before anything else at least.

What I did here, was build libisc, then libbind. At which point I built
usr.sbin/named and libexec/named-xfter. That worked out for me. This is
not complete, however I run bind compiled with -static and in a chroot of
/var/named so all I need is named/named-xfer. YMMV.

* Matt Heckaman   - mailto:matt@lucida.ca     http://www.lucida.ca/pgp *
* GPG fingerprint - 53CA 8320 C8F6 32ED 9DDF  036E 3171 C093 4AD3 1364 *

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: http://www.lucida.ca/pgp

iD8DBQE6d7YIMXHAk0rTE2QRApSyAJ9XPlSS3l9U99KHKjo4gqVv6S3BGQCeKlBJ
NmKk2pOcps6qVaYuNHRZGBg=
=YBga
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30 22:55:54 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from lucifer.ninth-circle.org (intotcpcb.sourcewh0re.net [194.158.168.74])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B6137B491
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 22:55:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from asmodai@localhost)
	by lucifer.ninth-circle.org (8.11.1/8.11.0) id f0V6tTW33545;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 07:55:29 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from asmodai)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 07:55:29 +0100
From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl>
To: Chris Byrnes <chris@awww.jeah.net>
Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: bind upgrade
Message-ID: <20010131075529.D33191@lucifer.bart.nl>
References: <200101310048.f0V0mMP76125@awww.jeah.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <200101310048.f0V0mMP76125@awww.jeah.net>; from chris@awww.jeah.net on Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 06:48:22PM -0600
Organisation: VIA Net.Works The Netherlands
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

-On [20010131 01:50], Chris Byrnes (chris@awww.jeah.net) wrote:
>in /usr/src/usr.sbin/named

Which FreeBSD version?

Are you doing a make world/buildworld?

Please some details other than the compilation error, since that one is
basically fixed.

-- 
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven          VIA Net.Works The Netherlands
BSD: Technical excellence at its best  Network- and systemadministrator
	  D78D D0AD 244D 1D12 C9CA  7152 035C 1138 546A B867
Misery loves company...


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30 22:56:41 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from lucifer.ninth-circle.org (lucifer.bart.nl [194.158.168.74])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6861437B4EC
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 22:56:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from asmodai@localhost)
	by lucifer.ninth-circle.org (8.11.1/8.11.0) id f0V6uGA33560;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 07:56:16 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from asmodai)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 07:56:15 +0100
From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl>
To: "Harpe, Mike" <MHarpe@hilliard.com>
Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: HELP! Can't build libbind from cvsup today...
Message-ID: <20010131075615.E33191@lucifer.bart.nl>
References: <3A7720D0.9D15EE82@hilliard.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <3A7720D0.9D15EE82@hilliard.com>; from MHarpe@hilliard.com on Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 03:15:12PM -0500
Organisation: VIA Net.Works The Netherlands
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

-On [20010130 21:20], Harpe, Mike (MHarpe@hilliard.com) wrote:
>===> libbind
>/usr/src/lib/libbind/../../contrib/bind/port/freebsd/include/port_after.h:2:
>unterminated `#if' conditional
>*** Error code 1
>
>Any ideas?  I cvsup'ed against a fresh source tree today.

cvsup again, it's been fixed.

FYI, this was 3-STABLE being upgraded.

-- 
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven          VIA Net.Works The Netherlands
BSD: Technical excellence at its best  Network- and systemadministrator
	  D78D D0AD 244D 1D12 C9CA  7152 035C 1138 546A B867
Misery loves company...


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30 23: 0:16 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from lucifer.ninth-circle.org (intotcpcb.sourcewh0re.net [194.158.168.74])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBB0737B65D
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 22:59:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from asmodai@localhost)
	by lucifer.ninth-circle.org (8.11.1/8.11.0) id f0V6xkL33579;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 07:59:46 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from asmodai)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 07:59:46 +0100
From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl>
To: Walter Campbell <wcampbel@botbay.net>
Cc: Greg Prosser <greg@straynet.com>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Upgrading just bind
Message-ID: <20010131075946.F33191@lucifer.bart.nl>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101302302310.96751-100000@voyager.straynet.com> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101302317270.245-100000@botbay.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101302317270.245-100000@botbay.net>; from wcampbel@botbay.net on Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 11:21:27PM -0500
Organisation: VIA Net.Works The Netherlands
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

-On [20010131 05:25], Walter Campbell (wcampbel@botbay.net) wrote:
>lib/libisc
>lib/libbind
>usr.bin/dig
>usr.bin/dnskeygen
>usr.bin/dnsquery
>usr.bin/host
>usr.sbin/named
>usr.sbin/ndc
>usr.sbin/nslookup
>usr.sbin/nsupdate
>libexec/named-xfer
>
>I BELIEVE that covers it all

Correct.

libisc, libbind, named, nslookup, nsupdate and named-xfer are the
important things this time around.

I'll have to see if I can automate this or something.

-- 
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven          VIA Net.Works The Netherlands
BSD: Technical excellence at its best  Network- and systemadministrator
	  D78D D0AD 244D 1D12 C9CA  7152 035C 1138 546A B867
Misery loves company...


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30 23: 3:42 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from lucifer.ninth-circle.org (intotcpcb.sourcewh0re.net [194.158.168.74])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EDE737B65D
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 23:03:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from asmodai@localhost)
	by lucifer.ninth-circle.org (8.11.1/8.11.0) id f0V73DC33647;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 08:03:13 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from asmodai)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 08:03:13 +0100
From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl>
To: Mark.Andrews@nominum.com
Cc: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>,
	Shawn Barnhart <swb@grasslake.net>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Upgrading just bind
Message-ID: <20010131080313.G33191@lucifer.bart.nl>
References: <20010130193804.A55110@xor.obsecurity.org> <200101310356.f0V3u7N29997@drugs.dv.isc.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <200101310356.f0V3u7N29997@drugs.dv.isc.org>; from Mark.Andrews@nominum.com on Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 02:56:07PM +1100
Organisation: VIA Net.Works The Netherlands
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

-On [20010131 05:00], Mark.Andrews@nominum.com (Mark.Andrews@nominum.com) wrote:
>	Actually we run different servers at different times in the
>	development cycles of the various releases. i.e. we guinea
>	pig our own product.
>
>	Most of the BIND 9 developers run BIND 9 on their own
>	machines / networks.  The server on my development machine
>	is BIND 9.2.0a1, the one my wife is using is BIND 9.1.0 and
>	she in not tolerent of stuffups.

*nod*

I held off on 9.0.x due to the fact that a lot of functionality was
missing.

9.1.x looks promising, but still lacks a few more things IIRC, my mind's
a bit warpy now after staring too often at the 8.2.x CHANGES file.
But 8.2.3 is already regarded as End Of Life/Line.

BIND 9 will require some CVS surgery due to the fact that directory
layout changed.

And I want to settle the dust first.

-- 
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven          VIA Net.Works The Netherlands
BSD: Technical excellence at its best  Network- and systemadministrator
	  D78D D0AD 244D 1D12 C9CA  7152 035C 1138 546A B867
Misery loves company...


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30 23: 5: 9 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from lucifer.ninth-circle.org (intotcpcb.sourcewh0re.net [194.158.168.74])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1DA637B503
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 23:04:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from asmodai@localhost)
	by lucifer.ninth-circle.org (8.11.1/8.11.0) id f0V74RN33665;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 08:04:27 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from asmodai)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 08:04:27 +0100
From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <jruigrok@via-net-works.nl>
To: Juha Saarinen <juha@saarinen.org>
Cc: Chris Faulhaber <jedgar@fxp.org>,
	"stable@freebsd.org" <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: Upgrading just bind
Message-ID: <20010131080427.H33191@lucifer.bart.nl>
References: <20010130142209.G26095@peitho.fxp.org> <Pine.LNX.4.31.0101310904540.27803-100000@vimfuego.saarinen.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.31.0101310904540.27803-100000@vimfuego.saarinen.org>; from juha@saarinen.org on Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 09:12:10AM +1300
Organisation: VIA Net.Works The Netherlands
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

-On [20010130 21:15], Juha Saarinen (juha@saarinen.org) wrote:
>Thanks, but that's not what I meant. I would like to remove the older BIND
>binaries etc, and replace them with 9.1 ones.

Fix make.conf to not compile BIND [why waste space?].

Remove the mayhap already installed binaries.

Install port and configure away happily.

-- 
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven          VIA Net.Works The Netherlands
BSD: Technical excellence at its best  Network- and systemadministrator
	  D78D D0AD 244D 1D12 C9CA  7152 035C 1138 546A B867
Misery loves company...


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Tue Jan 30 23:33:22 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from gw-nl1.origin-it.com (gw-nl1.origin-it.com [193.79.128.34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8E5B37B6C4
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Tue, 30 Jan 2001 23:33:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.de.origin-it.com (localhost.origin-it.com [127.0.0.1])
          by gw-nl1.origin-it.com with ESMTP id IAA12716;
          Wed, 31 Jan 2001 08:33:01 +0100 (MET)
          (envelope-from Helge.Oldach@de.origin-it.com)
Received: from smtprelay-de1.origin-it.com(172.16.188.53) by gw-nl1.origin-it.com via mwrap (4.0a)
	id xma012714; Wed, 31 Jan 01 08:33:01 +0100
Received: from mailhub.de.origin-it.com (mailhub.de.origin-it.com [172.16.189.20]) 
	by mail.de.origin-it.com (8.9.3/8.8.5-1.2.2m-19990317) with ESMTP id IAA25217; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 08:33:00 +0100 (MET)
Received: from galaxy.de.cp.philips.com (galaxy.de.cp.philips.com [130.143.166.29])
	by mailhub.de.origin-it.com (8.11.1/8.11.1/hmo23oct00) with ESMTP id f0V7Wxl13352;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 08:32:59 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from Helge.Oldach@de.origin-it.com)
Received: (from hmo@localhost)
	by galaxy.de.cp.philips.com (8.9.3/8.9.3/hmo14aug98) id IAA13606;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 08:32:57 +0100 (MET)
Message-Id: <200101310732.IAA13606@galaxy.de.cp.philips.com>
Subject: Re: Stable Isn't, for VLB 486
In-Reply-To: <200101292049.f0TKnUF00367@floater.nas.nasa.gov> from Dave Tweten at "Jan 29, 2001 12:49:30 pm"
To: tweten@nas.nasa.gov
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 08:32:57 +0100 (MET)
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
From: Helge Oldach <Helge.Oldach@de.origin-it.com>
X-Address: Atos Origin, Billstrasse 80, D-20539 Hamburg, Germany
X-Phone: +49 40 7886 464, Fax: +49 40 7886 235, Mobile: +49 160 4782517
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Dave Tweten:
>I updated Stable on January 24 for both my 586 laptop (which I'm using to send 
>this message) and my 486 VLB machine.  The kernel wouldn't boot on the 486.  
>Thinking I might have hit Stable while it was suffering transient instability, 
>I re-cvsupped on January 25, rebuilt world, rebuilt and reinstalled the 
>kernel, and suffered the same panic while booting:
>
>	ahc0: <Adapted 284X SCSI adapter> at 0x8c00-0x8cff, irq 10 (edge)
        -------------^

:-)

>	ahc0: on eisa0 slot 8
>
>	Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
>	fault virtual address	= 0x40

Justin had MFC'd patches to STABLE on 28th January which should fix
this.

Helge


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 31  1:14:18 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mta01.chello.no (mta01.chello.no [212.186.255.12])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CD3E37B503
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 01:14:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from c141-s10-r13h3.upc.chello.no ([212.186.234.141])
          by mta01.chello.no
          (InterMail vK.4.02.00.00 201-232-116 license 77df2db80a2bdce4d335ff4839618d42)
          with ESMTP
          id <20010131091501.OKSL1286.mta01@c141-s10-r13h3.upc.chello.no>;
          Wed, 31 Jan 2001 10:15:01 +0100
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 10:15:04 +0100 (CET)
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D8ystein_Skundberg?= <yskundbe@chello.no>
X-X-Sender:  <eskimo@igloo.chello.no>
To: Kenneth W Cochran <kwc@world.std.com>
Cc: <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: XFree86-4.0.2 problems, 4.2-stable
In-Reply-To: <200101310321.WAA11024@world.std.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.32.0101311013160.17430-100000@igloo.chello.no>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Kenneth W Cochran wrote:
>     The recent Security Advisory (FreeBSD-SA-01:07) mentions
>     that the BSD/OS ELF binary of Netscape works; where is that
>     available?  It is not in ports/packages.  (And do things
>     such as license terms allow its use on FreeBSD?)

eskimo:/usr/ports/www$ ls bsdi*
bsdi-netscape47-communicator:
Makefile        README.html     files           pkg-comment     pkg-descr
pkg-message     pkg-plist

bsdi-netscape47-navigator:
Makefile        README.html     pkg-comment     pkg-descr       pkg-plist


I suppose this is the one you mean?



=D8S



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 31  1:41:20 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from ntdub0e.trintech.com (gatekeeper.trintech.com [212.120.150.50])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9208B37B503
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 01:41:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ntdub0e.trintech.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
	id <DYJG9K3N>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 09:42:58 -0000
Message-ID: <F4F6A84AB884D31198F20008C724FD4A1ABE04@ntdub0e.trintech.com>
From: Daniel Brady <daniel.brady@trintech.com>
To: "'freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG'" <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Problem with Null Modem connection
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 09:42:57 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hi
Has anyone tried this successfully.  I have connected a null modem to com
port 1 (ttyd0) on a freebsd 4.2 stable box with no effect.  I reset the
/etc/ttys
to:
ttyd0   "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600"   vt100   on secure
ttyd1   "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600"   vt100   on secure

and did kill -1 1 still no luck
I know the cable is good and the laptop is working because i can do this on
an openbsd 2.8 stable box no problem so am i missing something specific to
FreeBSD?
TIA
Daniel Brady





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 31  2:41:36 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mail2.rdc1.il.home.com (mail2.rdc1.il.home.com [24.2.1.77])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C65237B69D
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 02:41:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from marx.marvic.chum ([24.17.229.11]) by mail2.rdc1.il.home.com
          (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with ESMTP
          id <20010131104117.CMCI14455.mail2.rdc1.il.home.com@marx.marvic.chum>
          for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 02:41:17 -0800
Received: (from vcardona@localhost)
	by marx.marvic.chum (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) id EAA04412
	for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 04:45:03 -0600
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 04:45:03 -0600
From: "Victor R. Cardona" <vcardona@home.com>
To: "'freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG'" <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: Problem with Null Modem connection
Message-ID: <20010131044503.B4325@home.com>
Mail-Followup-To: "'freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG'" <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
References: <F4F6A84AB884D31198F20008C724FD4A1ABE04@ntdub0e.trintech.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <F4F6A84AB884D31198F20008C724FD4A1ABE04@ntdub0e.trintech.com>; from daniel.brady@trintech.com on Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 09:42:57AM -0000
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 09:42:57AM -0000, Daniel Brady wrote:
> Hi
> Has anyone tried this successfully.  I have connected a null modem to com
> port 1 (ttyd0) on a freebsd 4.2 stable box with no effect.  I reset the
> /etc/ttys
> to:
> ttyd0   "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600"   vt100   on secure
> ttyd1   "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600"   vt100   on secure
> 
> and did kill -1 1 still no luck
> I know the cable is good and the laptop is working because i can do this on
> an openbsd 2.8 stable box no problem so am i missing something specific to
> FreeBSD?
> TIA
> Daniel Brady

I did it yesterday. I followed the instructions at
http://www.mostgraveconcern.com/freebsd.

HTH,
-- 
Victor R. Cardona 
GnuPG Key fingerprint = 62B1 7995 A830 432C 74E8  1337 EDDB E682 3C76 7404



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 31  2:41:45 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from castle.dreaming.org (castle.dreaming.org [216.221.214.170])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D39A537B69E
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 02:41:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Laptop (cr592943-a.bloor1.on.wave.home.com [24.156.38.199])
	by castle.dreaming.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f0VAfQd90130
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 05:41:27 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from mit@mitayai.net)
From: "Will Mitayai Keeso Rowe" <mit@mitayai.net>
To: <stable@freebsd.org>
Subject: improved performance
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 05:40:33 -0500
Message-ID: <NEBBIEGPMLMKDBMMICFNGEMAECAA.mit@mitayai.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Importance: Normal
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

I don't know what you folks have exactly been up to in the past three
months, but i've noticed that the performance of my mail shell machine (4.2
stable, kept updated ~every 2 weeks) has improved noticeably... particularly
when compiling. I thought that i had just been imagining it until i got an
email from one of my users saying the same thing last week after my last
upgrade cycle, and then tonight another mentioned it to me in passing over
beer.

So, whatever it is: thanks!
Cheers! ;-)

-Mit




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 31  3:33:26 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 83E8E37B6A7; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 03:33:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from des@localhost)
	by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id MAA25140;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 12:32:16 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from des@ofug.org)
X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/
X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily
  coincide with those of any organisation or company with
  which I am or have been affiliated.
To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: CONNER CFP1080 Filesystem Corruption
References: <200101301642.f0UGg5S27339@cwsys.cwsent.com>
From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
Date: 31 Jan 2001 12:32:15 +0100
In-Reply-To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group's message of "Tue, 30 Jan 2001 08:41:44 -0800"
Message-ID: <xzpu26gq7nk.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
Lines: 14
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca> writes:
> I just submitted a PR and patch in kern/24740 to fix a tagged queueing
> related filesystem corruption problem on CONNER CFP1080 drives.  The
> patch adds an entry to the xpt_quirk_tabke.  Anyone willing to commit
> this for me?

Hmm, I've had a CFP1080S (Antigua) for years, and never experienced
any trouble at all with it. It held my FreeBSD CVS repo mirror until I
got a new desktop last fall, so it's seen some pretty heavy activity
over the years.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 31  3:41:40 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from dilbert.fcg.co.uk (dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk [194.203.69.166])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 395D237B6A7
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 03:41:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pfrench by dilbert.fcg.co.uk with local (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 14NvdS-0000dc-00
	for stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 11:41:14 +0000
To: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: ssh problem upgrading to 4.2-stable
Message-Id: <E14NvdS-0000dc-00@dilbert.fcg.co.uk>
From: Pete French <pfrench@firstcallgroup.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 11:41:14 +0000
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

So, yesterday we upgraded the last machine running 3.5 here to 4.2 stable
(CVSuped on saturday I believe). All went very smoothly and everything runs
fine except for ssh. We are using openssh, and it rejects peoples
passwords with "Permission denied, please try again."

I seem to recall reading that password encryptionc hanged from MD5 to DES
between 3.x and 4.x - and I suspect this could be the problem. The
/usr/lib/libcrypt.so file is a link to libdescrypt.so, so I assume
we are now using DES passwords. Old users have MD5 passwords, but new
users are created with DES passwords. Using 'passwd' however converts them
to MD5. I have checked auth.conf, mailing list archives and done a web
search and am running out of ideas.

Am I barking up the wrong tree entirely here ?

-pete.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 31  3:56:13 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from oxmail.ox.ac.uk (oxmail3.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.180])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2765037B6AD
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 03:55:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ratbert.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.14.71])
	by oxmail.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1)
	id 14NvrX-0005U1-00
	for stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 11:55:47 +0000
Received: from neil by ratbert.oucs.ox.ac.uk with local (Exim 3.16 #1)
	id 14NvrR-00029r-00
	for stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 11:55:41 +0000
From: "Neil Long" <neil.long@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk>
Message-Id: <1010131115541.ZM8297@ratbert.oucs.ox.ac.uk>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 11:55:41 +0000
X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97)
To: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: buildworld problem with RELENG_3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hello

I have tried zapping /usr/obj and used cvsup2.uk.freebsd.org and tried
cvsup2.freebsd.org (no difference in cvsup log as of 11:30 GMT) but a
buildworld is bombing out in the
>>> Rebuilding tools needed to build libraries

phase at

===> cpp

...

/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/cc/cpp/../../../../contrib/gcc/cexp.y:471: request
for member `integer' in something not a structure or union


*** Error code 1

Stop.

sorry - I have no idea what this means and cexp.y is
-rw-r--r--  1 root  wheel  24380 Sep 18  1996 contrib/gcc/cexp.y


The last time I ran a build/install world was Dec 20th

I guess it is time to move to 4.x anyway but I would have liked to
leave 3 fully working.

regards
Neil

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 Dr Neil J Long, Computing Services, University of Oxford
 13 Banbury Road, Oxford, OX2 6NN, UK Tel:+44 1865 273232 Fax:+44 1865 273275
 EMail:       Neil.Long@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk  
 PGP:    ID 0xE88EF71F    OxCERT: oxcert@ox.ac.uk PGP: ID 0x4B11561D


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 31  4: 1:12 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from ntua.gr (achilles.noc.ntua.gr [147.102.222.210])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA8F737B6AE
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 04:00:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from netmode.ntua.gr (dolly.netmode.ece.ntua.gr [147.102.13.10])
	by ntua.gr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA25353;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 14:00:38 +0200 (EET)
Received: from edgar.netmode.ece.ntua.gr (edgar.netmode.ece.ntua.gr [147.102.13.70])
	by netmode.ntua.gr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f0VC7oD79681;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 14:07:50 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from past@edgar.netmode.ece.ntua.gr)
Received: (from past@localhost)
	by edgar.netmode.ece.ntua.gr (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f0VC0sF01092;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 14:00:54 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from past)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 14:00:54 +0200
From: Panagiotis Astithas <past@netmode.ntua.gr>
To: Daniel Brady <daniel.brady@trintech.com>
Cc: "'freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG'" <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: Problem with Null Modem connection
Message-ID: <20010131140053.B994@netmode.ece.ntua.gr>
Reply-To: past@netmode.ntua.gr
Mail-Followup-To: Daniel Brady <daniel.brady@trintech.com>,
	"'freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG'" <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
References: <F4F6A84AB884D31198F20008C724FD4A1ABE04@ntdub0e.trintech.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <F4F6A84AB884D31198F20008C724FD4A1ABE04@ntdub0e.trintech.com>; from daniel.brady@trintech.com on Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 09:42:57AM -0000
X-Organizational-Unit: Network Management and Optimal Design Laboratory
X-Organization: National Technical University of Athens, GREECE
X-Work-Phone: +30-1-772-1-450
X-Work-FAX: +30-1-772-1-452
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 09:42:57AM -0000, Daniel Brady wrote:
> Hi
> Has anyone tried this successfully.  I have connected a null modem to com
> port 1 (ttyd0) on a freebsd 4.2 stable box with no effect.  I reset the
> /etc/ttys
> to:
> ttyd0   "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600"   vt100   on secure

Have you also configured the other machine at 9600?
My configuration works even with type 'dialup' instead of 'vt100'.

> ttyd1   "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600"   vt100   on secure
> 
> and did kill -1 1 still no luck

Do you see the getty process running on ttyd1? If so you are fine.
The problem must be on the other side. What is your configuration
there?

> I know the cable is good and the laptop is working because i can do this on
> an openbsd 2.8 stable box no problem so am i missing something specific to
> FreeBSD?

-past


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 31  4:29:39 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from shell.cybersmart.co.za (shell.cybersmart.co.za [196.15.138.40])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7542237B6B1
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 04:29:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jacques by shell.cybersmart.co.za with local (Exim 3.16 #2)
	id 14NwNu-000IIN-00
	for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 14:29:14 +0200
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 14:29:14 +0200
From: Jacques Marneweck <jacques@serenity.org.za>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Make world in RELENG_3 is broken
Message-ID: <20010131142914.A70308@serenity.org.za>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hi all,

After cvsupping a box and running make world on the box it gets round to

m/timer.c -o timer.So
building shared library libatm.so.2
===> libbind
cc -O -pipe -I/usr/src/lib/libbind/../../contrib/bind/port/freebsd/include -I/us
r/src/lib/libbind/../../contrib/bind/include -DHMAC_MD5 -DUSE_MD5 -I/usr/obj/usr
/src/tmp/usr/include -c /usr/src/lib/libbind/../../contrib/bind/lib/irs/dns.c -o
 dns.o
In file included from /usr/src/lib/libbind/../../contrib/bind/lib/irs/dns.c:42:
/usr/src/lib/libbind/../../contrib/bind/port/freebsd/include/port_after.h:2: unt
erminated `#if' conditional
*** Error code 1

Stop.
*** Error code 1

Stop.
*** Error code 1

Stop.
*** Error code 1

Stop.
*** Error code 1

Any idea when someone can fix the problem.

Regards
--jm



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 31  4:42:34 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from point.osg.gov.bc.ca (point.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.102.44])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5C12A37B491; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 04:42:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by point.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.8.7/8.8.8) id EAA32418;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 04:41:37 -0800
Received: from passer.osg.gov.bc.ca(142.32.110.29)
 via SMTP by point.osg.gov.bc.ca, id smtpda32416; Wed Jan 31 04:41:28 2001
Received: (from uucp@localhost)
	by passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.11.2/8.9.1) id f0VCfNM36477;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 04:41:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cwsys9.cwsent.com(10.2.2.1), claiming to be "cwsys.cwsent.com"
 via SMTP by passer9.cwsent.com, id smtpdy36475; Wed Jan 31 04:41:22 2001
Received: (from uucp@localhost)
	by cwsys.cwsent.com (8.11.2/8.9.1) id f0VCfLS13294;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 04:41:21 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200101311241.f0VCfLS13294@cwsys.cwsent.com>
Received: from localhost.cwsent.com(127.0.0.1), claiming to be "cwsys"
 via SMTP by localhost.cwsent.com, id smtpdc12512; Wed Jan 31 04:40:28 2001
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 with nmh-1.0.4
Reply-To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca>
From: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca>
X-Sender: schubert
To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
Cc: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca>,
	freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: CONNER CFP1080 Filesystem Corruption 
In-reply-to: Your message of "31 Jan 2001 12:32:15 +0100."
             <xzpu26gq7nk.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 04:40:28 -0800
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG




Regards,                         Phone:  (250)387-8437
Cy Schubert                        Fax:  (250)387-5766
Team Leader, Sun/Alpha Team   Internet:  Cy.Schubert@osg.gov.bc.ca
Open Systems Group, ITSD, ISTA
Province of BC

In message <xzpu26gq7nk.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav 
writes:
> Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca> writes:
> > I just submitted a PR and patch in kern/24740 to fix a tagged queueing
> > related filesystem corruption problem on CONNER CFP1080 drives.  The
> > patch adds an entry to the xpt_quirk_tabke.  Anyone willing to commit
> > this for me?
> 
> Hmm, I've had a CFP1080S (Antigua) for years, and never experienced
> any trouble at all with it. It held my FreeBSD CVS repo mirror until I
> got a new desktop last fall, so it's seen some pretty heavy activity
> over the years.

I've got the same drive.  Attached to a 1542B it works fine.  Attached 
to a 2940U the filesystem is corrupted within minutes.  Reducing the 
bus speed to 5 MB/S and turning off tagged queueing fixes the problem.  
W/O the patch, it claims to be capable of 254 device openings -- I 
would think that's a bit high for an old drive.

Anyhow, I replaced the CFP1080S, which itself replaced a dead Quantum 
drive, with a brand new 4 GB Seagate -- replacing a 2 GB drive with a 1 
GB drive caused a host of other problems not related to problem 
discussed here.   :)



Regards,                         Phone:  (250)387-8437
Cy Schubert                        Fax:  (250)387-5766
Team Leader, Sun/Alpha Team   Internet:  Cy.Schubert@osg.gov.bc.ca
Open Systems Group, ITSD, ISTA
Province of BC





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 31  4:49:36 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6DADC37B69B; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 04:49:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from des@localhost)
	by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA25411;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 13:48:20 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from des@ofug.org)
X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/
X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily
  coincide with those of any organisation or company with
  which I am or have been affiliated.
To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: CONNER CFP1080 Filesystem Corruption
References: <200101311241.f0VCfLS13294@cwsys.cwsent.com>
From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
Date: 31 Jan 2001 13:48:19 +0100
In-Reply-To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group's message of "Wed, 31 Jan 2001 04:40:28 -0800"
Message-ID: <xzp66ivrip8.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
Lines: 16
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca> writes:
> In message <xzpu26gq7nk.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav 
> writes:
> > Hmm, I've had a CFP1080S (Antigua) for years, and never experienced
> > any trouble at all with it. [...]
> I've got the same drive.  Attached to a 1542B it works fine.  Attached 
> to a 2940U the filesystem is corrupted within minutes.

I have it on a 2940UW (factory default settings, except maybe for >1GB
support) which it shares with a Quantum Atlas II (XP4550W) and a
Tecmar Travan streamer. Never any trouble. I can mail you a dmesg when
I get home later tonight.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 31  4:51:34 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from ntdub0e.trintech.com (gatekeeper.trintech.com [212.120.150.50])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E53537B69B
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 04:51:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ntdub0e.trintech.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
	id <DYJG9LTM>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 12:53:12 -0000
Message-ID: <F4F6A84AB884D31198F20008C724FD4A1ABE06@ntdub0e.trintech.com>
From: Daniel Brady <daniel.brady@trintech.com>
To: "'freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG'" <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc: "'past@netmode.ntua.gr'" <past@netmode.ntua.gr>
Subject: RE: Problem with Null Modem connection
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 12:53:11 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

The other machine (winnt laptop) is set t0 9600 8-N-1 I had originally tried
with dialup in the /etc/ttys.  I don't see the getty process running. I
thought this was odd but I assumed that the process was not spawned untill
data was detected on the relevant port
Daniel

-----Original Message-----
From: Panagiotis Astithas [mailto:past@netmode.ntua.gr]
Sent: 31 January 2001 12:01
To: Daniel Brady
Cc: 'freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG'
Subject: Re: Problem with Null Modem connection


On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 09:42:57AM -0000, Daniel Brady wrote:
> Hi
> Has anyone tried this successfully.  I have connected a null modem to com
> port 1 (ttyd0) on a freebsd 4.2 stable box with no effect.  I reset the
> /etc/ttys
> to:
> ttyd0   "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600"   vt100   on secure

Have you also configured the other machine at 9600?
My configuration works even with type 'dialup' instead of 'vt100'.

> ttyd1   "/usr/libexec/getty std.9600"   vt100   on secure
> 
> and did kill -1 1 still no luck

Do you see the getty process running on ttyd1? If so you are fine.
The problem must be on the other side. What is your configuration
there?

> I know the cable is good and the laptop is working because i can do this
on
> an openbsd 2.8 stable box no problem so am i missing something specific to
> FreeBSD?

-past


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 31  4:58:37 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2854437B6B9
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 04:58:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr [134.157.10.1])
          by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.10.0/jtpda-5.3.3) with ESMTP id f0VCwEq06359
          for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 13:58:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: from rose.lpthe.jussieu.fr (root@[134.157.10.102])
          by parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (8.11.1/jtpda-5.3.1) with ESMTP id f0VCwC327590
          for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 13:58:13 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from michel@localhost)
	by rose.lpthe.jussieu.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f0VCwDt00521
	for stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 13:58:13 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from michel)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 13:58:13 +0100
From: Michel Talon <michel@lpthe.jussieu.fr>
To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: ssh problem upgrading to 4.2-stable
Message-ID: <20010131135813.A484@lpthe.jussieu.fr>
Mail-Followup-To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG
References: <E14NvdS-0000dc-00@dilbert.fcg.co.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre2i
In-Reply-To: <E14NvdS-0000dc-00@dilbert.fcg.co.uk>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 11:41:14AM +0000, Pete French wrote:
> So, yesterday we upgraded the last machine running 3.5 here to 4.2 stable
> (CVSuped on saturday I believe). All went very smoothly and everything runs
> fine except for ssh. We are using openssh, and it rejects peoples
> passwords with "Permission denied, please try again."
> 
> I seem to recall reading that password encryptionc hanged from MD5 to DES
> between 3.x and 4.x - and I suspect this could be the problem. The
> /usr/lib/libcrypt.so file is a link to libdescrypt.so, so I assume
> we are now using DES passwords. Old users have MD5 passwords, but new
> users are created with DES passwords. Using 'passwd' however converts them
> to MD5. I have checked auth.conf, mailing list archives and done a web
> search and am running out of ideas.
> 

There is an issue with /etc/pam.conf. You can overwrite it with the one
under /usr/src. This worked for me.

Also there is another pithole (i fell into): sshd dies because there is an
obsolete option in /etc/ssh/sshd_config, that you need to remove.
ConnectionsPerPeriod 5/10


> Am I barking up the wrong tree entirely here ?
> 
> -pete.
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

-- 
Michel Talon


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 31  5: 9: 1 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from point.osg.gov.bc.ca (point.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.102.44])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E46F737B6C4; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 05:08:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by point.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.8.7/8.8.8) id FAA32487;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 05:07:58 -0800
Received: from passer.osg.gov.bc.ca(142.32.110.29)
 via SMTP by point.osg.gov.bc.ca, id smtpda32485; Wed Jan 31 05:07:39 2001
Received: (from uucp@localhost)
	by passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.11.2/8.9.1) id f0VD7YA36695;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 05:07:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cwsys9.cwsent.com(10.2.2.1), claiming to be "cwsys.cwsent.com"
 via SMTP by passer9.cwsent.com, id smtpdi36693; Wed Jan 31 05:07:22 2001
Received: (from uucp@localhost)
	by cwsys.cwsent.com (8.11.2/8.9.1) id f0VD7LN21917;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 05:07:21 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200101311307.f0VD7LN21917@cwsys.cwsent.com>
Received: from localhost.cwsent.com(127.0.0.1), claiming to be "cwsys"
 via SMTP by localhost.cwsent.com, id smtpdc21907; Wed Jan 31 05:06:48 2001
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 with nmh-1.0.4
X-Exmh-Isig-CompType: repl
X-Exmh-Isig-Folder: inbox
Reply-To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca>
From: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca>
X-Sender: schubert
To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
Cc: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca>,
	freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: CONNER CFP1080 Filesystem Corruption 
In-reply-to: Your message of "31 Jan 2001 13:48:19 +0100."
             <xzp66ivrip8.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 05:06:47 -0800
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In message <xzp66ivrip8.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav 
writes:
> Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca> writes:
> > In message <xzpu26gq7nk.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav 
> > writes:
> > > Hmm, I've had a CFP1080S (Antigua) for years, and never experienced
> > > any trouble at all with it. [...]
> > I've got the same drive.  Attached to a 1542B it works fine.  Attached 
> > to a 2940U the filesystem is corrupted within minutes.
> 
> I have it on a 2940UW (factory default settings, except maybe for >1GB
> support) which it shares with a Quantum Atlas II (XP4550W) and a
> Tecmar Travan streamer. Never any trouble. I can mail you a dmesg when
> I get home later tonight.

This is dmesg from when I still had the Conner drive installed.  I've
removed the redundant syslog header.

Copyright (c) 1992-2000 The FreeBSD Project.
Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994
The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved.
FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE #9: Tue Jan 30 06:59:46 PST 2001
root@:/opt/cvs-420r/src/sys/compile/CWSYS
Timecounter "i8254"  frequency 1193182 Hz
Timecounter "TSC"  frequency 119752645 Hz
CPU: Pentium/P54C (119.75-MHz 586-class CPU)
Origin = "GenuineIntel"  Id = 0x52c  
Stepping = 12
Features=0x1bf<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,MCE,CX8>
real memory  = 83886080 (81920K bytes)
avail memory = 78356480 (76520K bytes)
Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc0337000.
Intel Pentium detected, installing workaround for F00F bug
md0: Malloc disk
npx0: <math processor> on motherboard
npx0: INT 16 interface
pcib0: <Host to PCI bridge> on motherboard
pci0: <PCI bus> on pcib0
isab0: <Intel 82371SB PCI to ISA bridge> at device 7.0 on pci0
isa0: <ISA bus> on isab0
atapci0: <Intel PIIX3 ATA controller> port 0xf000-0xf00f at device 7.1 on pci0
ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0
ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0
pci0: <Intel 82371SB (PIIX3) USB controller> at 7.2 irq 9
xl0: <3Com 3c905B-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port 0x6000-0x607f mem 0xe4001000-0xe400107f irq 5 at device 18.0 on pci0
xl0: Ethernet address: 00:50:da:80:28:96
miibus0: <MII bus> on xl0
xlphy0: <3Com internal media interface> on miibus 0
xlphy0:  10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100base TX-FDX, auto
ahc0: <Adaptec 2940 Ultra SCSI adapter> port 0x6100-0x61ff mem 0xe4000000-0xe4000fff irq 5 at device 19.0 on pci0
aic7880: Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 16/255 SCBs
pci0: <S3 Trio graphics accelerator> at 20.0 irq 12
fdc0: <NEC 72065B or clone> at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0
x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0
fdc0: FIFO enabled, 8 bytes threshold
fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0
fd1: <1200-KB 5.25" drive> on fdc0 drive 1
aha0 at port 0x330-0x333 irq 11 drq 5 on isa0
aha0: AHA-1542CF FW Rev. C.0 (ID=45) SCSI Host Adapter, SCSI ID 7, 16 CCBs
atkbdc0: <Keyboard controller (i8042)> at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0
atkbd0: <AT Keyboard> irq 1 on atkbdc0
vga0: <Generic ISA VGA> at port 
0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0
sc0: <System console> on isa0
sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x200>
sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0
sio0: type 16550A
sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0
sio1: type 16550A
ppc0: <Parallel port> at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0
ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode
lpt0: <Printer> on ppbus0
lpt0: Interrupt-driven port
ep0: <3Com 3C509-Combo EtherLink III> at port 0x300-0x30f irq 10 on isa0
ep0: Ethernet address 00:60:97:d3:32:3e
IP packet filtering initialized, divert enabled,
rule-based forwarding enabled, default to deny, unlimited logging
DUMMYNET initialized (000608)
IP Filter: v3.4.16 initialized.  Default = block all, Logging = enabled
ad0: 2014MB <WDC AC22100H> [4092/16/63] at ata0-master WDMA2
ad2: 2441MB <WDC AC22500L> [4960/16/63] at ata1-master WDMA2
Waiting 15 seconds for SCSI devices to settle
sa0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 4 lun 0
sa0: <ARCHIVE Python 28388-XXX 5.45> Removable Se quential Access SCSI-2 device
sa0: 7.812MB/s transfers (7.812MHz, offset 15) da1 at ahc0 bus 0 target 1 lun 0
da1: <SEAGATE ST34520N 1487> Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da1: 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 15), Tagged Queueing Enabled
da1: 4340MB (8888924 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 4340C)
da0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0
da0: <CONNER CFP1080S 4649> Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device
da0: 10.000MB/s transfers (10.000MHz, offset 15)
da0: 1030MB (2110812 512 byte sectors: 64H 32S/T 1030C)
Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a
cd0 at ahc0 bus 0 target 2 lun 0
cd0: <PLEXTOR CD-ROM PX-4XCH 1.22> Removable CD-ROM SCSI-2 device
cd0: 4.032MB/s transfers (4.032MHz, offset 15)
cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present
da2 at aha0 bus 0 target 6 lun 0
da2: <IOMEGA ZIP 100 D.09> Removable Direct Acces s SCSI-2 device
da2: 3.300MB/s transfers   
da2: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present 



Regards,                         Phone:  (250)387-8437
Cy Schubert                        Fax:  (250)387-5766
Team Leader, Sun/Alpha Team   Internet:  Cy.Schubert@osg.gov.bc.ca
Open Systems Group, ITSD, ISTA
Province of BC







To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 31  5:34:41 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from sgi04-e.std.COM (sgi04-e.std.com [199.172.62.134])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C92BB37B6AA
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 05:34:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from world.std.com (world-f.std.com [199.172.62.5])
	by sgi04-e.std.COM (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA2977092;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 08:34:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from kwc@localhost)
	by world.std.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id IAA09998;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 08:34:18 -0500 (EST)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 08:34:18 -0500 (EST)
From: Kenneth W Cochran <kwc@world.std.com>
Message-Id: <200101311334.IAA09998@world.std.com>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D8ystein_Skundberg?= <yskundbe@chello.no>
Subject: Re: XFree86-4.0.2 problems, 4.2-stable
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 10:15:04 +0100 (CET)
>From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?=D8ystein_Skundberg?= <yskundbe@chello.no>
>To: Kenneth W Cochran <kwc@world.std.com>
>cc: <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
>Subject: Re: XFree86-4.0.2 problems, 4.2-stable
>
>On Tue, 30 Jan 2001, Kenneth W Cochran wrote:
>>     The recent Security Advisory (FreeBSD-SA-01:07) mentions
>>     that the BSD/OS ELF binary of Netscape works; where is that
>>     available?  It is not in ports/packages.  (And do things
>>     such as license terms allow its use on FreeBSD?)
>
>eskimo:/usr/ports/www$ ls bsdi*
>bsdi-netscape47-communicator:
>Makefile        README.html     files           pkg-comment     pkg-descr
>pkg-message     pkg-plist
>
>bsdi-netscape47-navigator:
>Makefile        README.html     pkg-comment     pkg-descr       pkg-plist
>
>I suppose this is the one you mean?

Ahhh!  Thanks...  Oops...  The Makefile lists it as
FORBIDDEN, due to a buffer-overflow, fixed in version
4.76.  The latest BSDI-Netscape appears to be 4.75.  :(

I guess I'm back to my "original 2 problems..."
1.  Fvwm95-2.0.43a Start/popup menu not working
2.  Netscape Communicator 4.76 keymapping.

The Big Change That Broke These Things was going from
XFree86-3.3.6 to 4.0.2.  Given the interactions of the
various components involved & that (IMO) this is more an
"application" problem than a "system" problem, can someone
suggest a Better Place To Ask besides FreeBSD-stable?

Thanks,

-kc


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 31  5:48: 8 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from gemma.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (gemma.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [129.70.136.103])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60BAC37B503
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 05:47:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from fusilli.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (fusilli.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [129.70.133.55])
	by gemma.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (8.9.1/8.9.1/TechFak/pk+ro20000427) with SMTP id OAA12805;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 14:47:46 +0100 (MET)
From: Oliver Schonefeld <oschonef@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
Received: by fusilli.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (SMI-8.6/pk970604A)
	id OAA19639; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 14:47:45 +0100
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 14:47:45 +0100
To: Helge Oldach <Helge.Oldach@de.origin-it.com>
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Stable Isn't, for VLB 486
Message-ID: <20010131144745.A19632@fusilli.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
References: <200101292049.f0TKnUF00367@floater.nas.nasa.gov> <200101310732.IAA13606@galaxy.de.cp.philips.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i
In-Reply-To: <200101310732.IAA13606@galaxy.de.cp.philips.com>; from Helge.Oldach@de.origin-it.com on Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 08:32:57AM +0100
X-Zen: Oooommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hello!

Eines schoenen Tages schrieb Helge Oldach:
> Dave Tweten:
[somestuffaboutnonworkingeisaadaptecsnipped]
> 
> Justin had MFC'd patches to STABLE on 28th January which should fix
> this.

Yes, it's working again :)

-- 
--------------------------------------------------------
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me in your ~/.signature
to help me spread!             <- Save this lifeform ;-)


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 31  6:27:31 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from AMSPRV-SMTP02.prv.versatel.com (unknown [62.58.16.73])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70E1337B491
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 06:27:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from amshqb-exch02.versatel.com ([10.205.18.36]) by AMSPRV-SMTP02.prv.versatel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.1600);
	 Wed, 31 Jan 2001 15:27:49 +0100
Received: by AMSHQB-EXCH02 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
	id <1AZ2JZM0>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 15:27:42 +0100
Message-ID: <77A588078DF6D3118C0A00508B8E0367038757F2@AMSHQB-EXCH02>
From: Lisa Goulet <Lisa.Goulet@versatel.nl>
To: "'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject: Bind 8.2.3-T5B
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 15:27:41 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 31 Jan 2001 14:27:49.0700 (UTC) FILETIME=[FCF7F040:01C08B91]
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


Hi all,

Does the above bind version have the recently announced "ispig" bug?

What is the best way to update to the next version of bind that doesn't have
the bug? I'm running 4.1.1.

Regards,
Lisa




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 31  6:54:44 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from point.osg.gov.bc.ca (point.osg.gov.bc.ca [142.32.102.44])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B65CE37B491
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 06:54:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from daemon@localhost)
	by point.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.8.7/8.8.8) id GAA32721;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 06:54:21 -0800
Received: from passer.osg.gov.bc.ca(142.32.110.29)
 via SMTP by point.osg.gov.bc.ca, id smtpda32719; Wed Jan 31 06:54:09 2001
Received: (from uucp@localhost)
	by passer.osg.gov.bc.ca (8.11.2/8.9.1) id f0VEs3m06484;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 06:54:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cwsys9.cwsent.com(10.2.2.1), claiming to be "cwsys.cwsent.com"
 via SMTP by passer9.cwsent.com, id smtpdvS5545; Wed Jan 31 06:53:32 2001
Received: (from uucp@localhost)
	by cwsys.cwsent.com (8.11.2/8.9.1) id f0VErR822709;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 06:53:27 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200101311453.f0VErR822709@cwsys.cwsent.com>
Received: from localhost.cwsent.com(127.0.0.1), claiming to be "cwsys"
 via SMTP by localhost.cwsent.com, id smtpda22702; Wed Jan 31 06:52:38 2001
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 with nmh-1.0.4
Reply-To: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca>
From: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <Cy.Schubert@uumail.gov.bc.ca>
X-Sender: schubert
To: brunomiguel@netcabo.pt
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: IPFilter will not allow traceroute anymore 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 28 Jan 2001 15:44:50 GMT."
             <3A743E72.3727.1396DB@localhost> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 06:52:37 -0800
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In message <3A743E72.3727.1396DB@localhost>, "Bruno Miguel" writes:
> > Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group wrote:
> > 
> > > You're probably better of installing IPF 3.4.16.  There have been many
> > > bugfixes and improvements since 3.4.8 (version of IPF packaged with
> > > FreeBSD-STABLE).
> > I tried to install IPF 3.4.16 yesterday on fresh -STABLE, but after this
> > my kernel couldn't be made. whilte making depend I got
> 
> Find the correct path for osreldate.h and you see it is not where ip_compat.c
>  
> is looking for it. You will need to fix a couple paths on a couple files. Why
>  
> not use modules ? :-)
> This error is going on for a long time now, I dunno why Darren hasn't fixed i
> t 
> yet, though.

I work around the problem by,

--- FreeBSD-4.0/kinstall.orig   Thu Oct 19 07:23:50 2000
+++ FreeBSD-4.0/kinstall        Fri Nov 17 05:15:38 2000
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@
 echo ""
 echo "Linking /usr/include/osreldate.h to /sys/sys/osreldate.h"
 ln -s /usr/include/osreldate.h /sys/sys/osreldate.h
+ln -s /usr/include/osreldate.h /sys/osreldate.h

 echo ""
 echo "Patching ip6_input.c and ip6_output.c"

It's a kludge but it works until I find the time to develop a long term 
fix.


Regards,                         Phone:  (250)387-8437
Cy Schubert                        Fax:  (250)387-5766
Team Leader, Sun/Alpha Team   Internet:  Cy.Schubert@osg.gov.bc.ca
Open Systems Group, ITSD, ISTA
Province of BC





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 31  7: 4:28 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from harp.wrdp.com (harp.dublin.wrdp.net [212.147.130.131])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2204E37B4EC
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 07:04:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from JRAFTERY (jraftery.dublin.wrdp.net [172.16.4.52])
	by harp.wrdp.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 130C810AC1
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 15:04:00 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <002901c08b97$552032f0$340410ac@JRAFTERY>
From: "James Raftery" <jraftery@wrdp.com>
To: <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
References: <77A588078DF6D3118C0A00508B8E0367038757F2@AMSHQB-EXCH02>
Subject: Re: Bind 8.2.3-T5B
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 15:06:04 -0000
Organization: Worldport Communications Inc
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="Windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> Does the above bind version have the recently announced "ispig" bug?

I don't know of a "ispig" bug. The two released recently for BIND 8.x
are called "tsig" and "infoleak" at
http://www.isc.org/products/BIND/bind-security.html

All versions of BIND 8 before 8.2.3 (including betas) have these bugs
present.

> What is the best way to update to the next version of bind that
doesn't have
> the bug? I'm running 4.1.1.

You can update to 4-STABLE using the instructions at
http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/cutting-edge.html.

Or, you can install the port of 8.2.3 from /usr/ports/net/bind8 (make
sure you have a recent copy of the ports tree) which will install BIND
8.2.3 under /usr/local. You need to then use /usr/local/sbin/named
instead of /usr/sbin/named.


Regards,

james



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 31  7:23: 9 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from ntua.gr (achilles.noc.ntua.gr [147.102.222.210])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C83B37B65D
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 07:22:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from netmode.ntua.gr (dolly.netmode.ece.ntua.gr [147.102.13.10])
	by ntua.gr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA15105;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 17:22:29 +0200 (EET)
Received: from edgar.netmode.ece.ntua.gr (edgar.netmode.ece.ntua.gr [147.102.13.70])
	by netmode.ntua.gr (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f0VFTfD81393;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 17:29:41 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from past@edgar.netmode.ece.ntua.gr)
Received: (from past@localhost)
	by edgar.netmode.ece.ntua.gr (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f0VFMlT04739;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 17:22:48 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from past)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 17:22:46 +0200
From: Panagiotis Astithas <past@netmode.ntua.gr>
To: Kenneth W Cochran <kwc@world.std.com>
Cc: Oystein Skundberg <yskundbe@chello.no>,
	freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: XFree86-4.0.2 problems, 4.2-stable
Message-ID: <20010131172245.A4692@netmode.ece.ntua.gr>
Reply-To: past@netmode.ntua.gr
Mail-Followup-To: Kenneth W Cochran <kwc@world.std.com>,
	Oystein Skundberg <yskundbe@chello.no>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
References: <200101311334.IAA09998@world.std.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <200101311334.IAA09998@world.std.com>; from kwc@world.std.com on Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 08:34:18AM -0500
X-Organizational-Unit: Network Management and Optimal Design Laboratory
X-Organization: National Technical University of Athens, GREECE
X-Work-Phone: +30-1-772-1-450
X-Work-FAX: +30-1-772-1-452
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 08:34:18AM -0500, Kenneth W Cochran wrote:
> I guess I'm back to my "original 2 problems..."
> 1.  Fvwm95-2.0.43a Start/popup menu not working
> 2.  Netscape Communicator 4.76 keymapping.

WRT the keymapping problem, the behavior I observe in my system 
(XFree86-4.0.2_5) is as follows:
- when I use XkbModel "pc101" the "windows" key is not mapped to Alt.
- when I use XkbModel "pc104" the "windows" key IS mapped to Alt.

You should probably take a look in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb.
I don't know if this helps much, but ...

-past


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 31  7:37: 4 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from ntua.gr (achilles.noc.ntua.gr [147.102.222.210])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D65037B503
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 07:36:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from edgar.netmode.ece.ntua.gr (edgar.netmode.ece.ntua.gr [147.102.13.70])
	by ntua.gr (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA17450;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 17:36:04 +0200 (EET)
Received: (from past@localhost)
	by edgar.netmode.ece.ntua.gr (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f0VFU8k04754;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 17:30:09 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from past)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 17:30:08 +0200
From: Panagiotis Astithas <past@netmode.ntua.gr>
To: Daniel Brady <daniel.brady@trintech.com>
Cc: "'freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG'" <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: Problem with Null Modem connection
Message-ID: <20010131173007.B4692@netmode.ece.ntua.gr>
Reply-To: past@netmode.ntua.gr
Mail-Followup-To: Daniel Brady <daniel.brady@trintech.com>,
	"'freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG'" <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
References: <F4F6A84AB884D31198F20008C724FD4A1ABE06@ntdub0e.trintech.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-7
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <F4F6A84AB884D31198F20008C724FD4A1ABE06@ntdub0e.trintech.com>; from daniel.brady@trintech.com on Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 12:53:11PM -0000
X-Organizational-Unit: Network Management and Optimal Design Laboratory
X-Organization: National Technical University of Athens, GREECE
X-Work-Phone: +30-1-772-1-450
X-Work-FAX: +30-1-772-1-452
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 12:53:11PM -0000, Daniel Brady wrote:
> The other machine (winnt laptop) is set t0 9600 8-N-1 I had originally tried
> with dialup in the /etc/ttys.  I don't see the getty process running. I
> thought this was odd but I assumed that the process was not spawned untill
> data was detected on the relevant port

Actually the getty process will detect the data on the serial port and
act accordingly. Perhaps when you do 'kill -1 1' some error messages
are logged in /var/log/{messages,console}? Is any other getty process
running? Maybe there is some syntax error in /etc/ttys? I have never 
experienced such behavior so I am rather guessing at this moment.

-past


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 31  9:15:37 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from eng05.embratel.net.br (eng05.embratel.net.br [200.255.125.133])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C627637B503
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 09:15:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jonny.eng.br (willow [200.255.125.142])
	by eng05.embratel.net.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 847B824D2E
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 15:15:09 -0200 (BRST)
Message-ID: <3A784846.27E560E9@jonny.eng.br>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 15:15:51 -0200
From: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis <jonny@jonny.eng.br>
Organization: Internet via Embratel
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: URG: IPFW and kernel msgbuf corruption
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hi,

    I've seen some messages in the mail archives about this, but none got to
the real problem!  FreeBSD -stable from yesterday (2000.01.30) has a bug in
ipfw logging that corrupts kernel msgbuf (dmesg) area.  Maybe some other
modules have this bug also, but I could not reproduce them.  This bug is
definitely not present in 4.2-RELEASE, as I have downgraded my system with
cvsup and repeated the tests.

    My test procedure is to attack my test system with nmap, and look for the
ipfw log messages.  They corrupt the whole msgbuf area, like this:

bash-2.04# dmesg
>ipfw: 20050 Deny TCP 200.255.125.133:39372 200.255.125.137:6007 in via fxp0
bash-2.04#

    Only one line of messages?  I have 80k of message buffer defined:

options         MSGBUF_SIZE=81920

   If I try some other form of kernel messages, for example, a SCSI bus reset,
the problem does not happen:

bash-2.04# camcontrol reset 0:6:0
Reset of 0:6:0 returned error 0xb
bash-2.04# dmesg
.255.125.133:39371 200.255.125.137:461 in via fxp0
(pass5:ahc0:0:6:0): Bus Device Reset Message Sent
ahc0: Bus Device Reset on A:6. 0 SCBs aborted
(pass5:ahc0:0:6:0): SCB 0x9 - timed out while idle, SEQADDR == 0x7
STACK == 0x3, 0x10d, 0x163, 0xec
SXFRCTL0 == 0x80
ahc0: Dumping Card State at SEQADDR 0x7
SCB count = 50
Kernel NEXTQSCB = 16
...
LOTS OF KERNEL MESSAGES STRIPPED OUT

  And after some more nmap:

bash-2.04# dmesg
25.137:937 in via fxp0
bash-2.04#

  This is a real bug!


                                        Jonny

-- 
Joćo Carlos Mendes Luķs                 jonny@embratel.net.br
  Networking Engineer                   jonny@jonny.eng.br
 Internet via Embratel			jcml@ieee.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 31  9:20: 4 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from area51.v-wave.com (area51.v-wave.com [24.108.173.252])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 05EDC37B4EC
	for <FreeBSD-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 09:19:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 850 invoked by uid 1001); 31 Jan 2001 17:19:41 -0000
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 10:19:41 -0700
From: Chris Wasser <cwasser@v-wave.com>
To: FreeBSD-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: devfs in -stable
Message-ID: <20010131101941.A815@skunkworks.arpa.mil>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE i386
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

I've gone through the mailing list archives (-questions, -stable,
-current and -fs) searching for information on devfs. I've got it (I
think anyways) running, but it does not appear to exihibit behavior I
read in the archived posts.

kernel (relevant info):
options		DEVFS

I then went to the manpage for devfs and read what it had to say, had a
fstab entry, which I added. I later read this was unncessary and removed
it (but still got same results)

mount (relevant info):
devfs on dummy_mount (devfs, local)
devfs on /devs (devfs, local)

When I removed the fstab entry (as indicated by the archived posts) only
the dummy_mount entry remains. My original /dev (traditional?) remains
in both cases (whether devfs is delcared in /etc/fstab or not)

For the /etc/fstab entry of devfs, I ofcourse created /devs

I then went and read /usr/src/sys/miscfs/devfs/README for any further
clue as to what might be going on but learned nothing beyond what I
already see.

It's my understanding that enabling DEVFS will mount it to /dev and
create the necessary devices (and then using /etc/rc.devfs, once can
create the appropiate symlinks) yet it doesn't.

Am I missing something?

- Chris


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 31  9:26:20 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from entropy.mx (CC2-2464.charter-stl.com [24.217.121.178])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1A87D37B503; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 09:26:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from ajh3@localhost)
	by entropy.mx (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f0VHPnR71243;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 11:25:49 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from ajh3)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 11:25:49 -0600
From: Andrew Hesford <ajh3@chmod.ath.cx>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Cc: FreeBSD-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: devfs in -stable
Message-ID: <20010131112549.A71208@cec.wustl.edu>
References: <20010131101941.A815@skunkworks.arpa.mil>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20010131101941.A815@skunkworks.arpa.mil>; from cwasser@v-wave.com on Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 10:19:41AM -0700
X-Loop: Andrew Hesford
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Of course you're missing something. If you mount it on /devs, it won't
mount on /dev... You need to specify a mountpoint of /dev if you're
confident it will work.

> It's my understanding that enabling DEVFS will mount it to /dev and
> create the necessary devices (and then using /etc/rc.devfs, once can
> create the appropiate symlinks) yet it doesn't.
> 
> Am I missing something?

-- 
Andrew Hesford - ajh3@chmod.ath.cx
"355/113 -- Not the famous irrational number PI,
 but an incredible simulation!"


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 31  9:41:12 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from area51.v-wave.com (area51.v-wave.com [24.108.173.252])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7CE3F37B65D
	for <FreeBSD-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 09:40:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 1033 invoked by uid 1001); 31 Jan 2001 17:40:54 -0000
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 10:40:54 -0700
From: Chris Wasser <cwasser@v-wave.com>
To: FreeBSD-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: devfs in -stable
Message-ID: <20010131104054.B855@skunkworks.arpa.mil>
References: <20010131101941.A815@skunkworks.arpa.mil> <20010131112549.A71208@cec.wustl.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20010131112549.A71208@cec.wustl.edu>; from ajh3@chmod.ath.cx on Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 11:25:49AM -0600
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE i386
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Wed 31 Jan 2001, Andrew Hesford wrote:
> Of course you're missing something. If you mount it on /devs, it won't
> mount on /dev... You need to specify a mountpoint of /dev if you're
> confident it will work.

Yes, I realize this.

As I stated, the manpage says the default mountpoint for devfs is /devs
(thus why I made an fstab entry for it), which I later read from the
archived mailing list posts was not required, init will mount devfs on
it's own (which it does) and thus removed the /etc/fstab directory,
leaving me with devfs mounting to "dummy_mount" and my original /dev
remaining intact (ie: devfs does not mount in it's place)

What I'm not clear on is why it doesn't mount to /dev (as I read in the
archived posts) and whats up with the dummy_mount mountpoint.

I fully realize I can easily tell it to mount to /dev, but from what I
read, I don't need to, init will automatically mount it to /dev for me
(or so I've read so far, there isn't much current information in the
archived posts on devfs pretaining to this -- all the information I did
find states devfs will mount to /dev on it's own, if enabled) and I can
go about my merry way.

- Chris



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 31 10:43:44 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from meow.osd.bsdi.com (meow.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.28.88])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A7F137B491
	for <FreeBSD-stable@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 10:43:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from laptop.baldwin.cx (john@jhb-laptop.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.28.241])
	by meow.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.1/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f0VIbo315407;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 10:37:50 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jhb@FreeBSD.org)
Message-ID: <XFMail.010131104316.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
X-Mailer: XFMail 1.4.0 on FreeBSD
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20010131104054.B855@skunkworks.arpa.mil>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 10:43:16 -0800 (PST)
From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
To: Chris Wasser <cwasser@v-wave.com>
Subject: Re: devfs in -stable
Cc: FreeBSD-stable@FreeBSD.org
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


On 31-Jan-01 Chris Wasser wrote:
> On Wed 31 Jan 2001, Andrew Hesford wrote:
>> Of course you're missing something. If you mount it on /devs, it won't
>> mount on /dev... You need to specify a mountpoint of /dev if you're
>> confident it will work.
> 
> Yes, I realize this.
> 
> As I stated, the manpage says the default mountpoint for devfs is /devs
> (thus why I made an fstab entry for it), which I later read from the
> archived mailing list posts was not required, init will mount devfs on
> it's own (which it does) and thus removed the /etc/fstab directory,
> leaving me with devfs mounting to "dummy_mount" and my original /dev
> remaining intact (ie: devfs does not mount in it's place)

This only applies in current, which has a different DEVFS implementation.

> What I'm not clear on is why it doesn't mount to /dev (as I read in the
> archived posts) and whats up with the dummy_mount mountpoint.

Mount it on /devs using /etc/fstab, then go look in /devs to make sure it all
looks ok.  If it does, then change /etc/fstab to mount it on /dev.  However, it
probably won't all look ok, as DEVFS in -stable is broken.  Which is why it is
turned off.

> I fully realize I can easily tell it to mount to /dev, but from what I
> read, I don't need to, init will automatically mount it to /dev for me
> (or so I've read so far, there isn't much current information in the
> archived posts on devfs pretaining to this -- all the information I did
> find states devfs will mount to /dev on it's own, if enabled) and I can
> go about my merry way.

The init mounting business is only in current for the new DEVFS.  I don't think
the old devfs did this.

> - Chris

-- 

John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> -- http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
PGP Key: http://www.baldwin.cx/~john/pgpkey.asc
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!"  -  http://www.FreeBSD.org/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 31 10:58:48 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from obsecurity.org (adsl-64-169-104-72.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.169.104.72])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C36337B491
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 10:58:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id CD6E5BA0CB; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 10:58:58 -0800 (PST)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 10:58:58 -0800
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: Jacques Marneweck <jacques@serenity.org.za>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Make world in RELENG_3 is broken
Message-ID: <20010131105858.A67124@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <20010131142914.A70308@serenity.org.za>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20010131142914.A70308@serenity.org.za>; from jacques@serenity.org.za on Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 02:29:14PM +0200
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


--nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 02:29:14PM +0200, Jacques Marneweck wrote:
> Hi all,
>=20
> After cvsupping a box and running make world on the box it gets round to

This was fixed some days ago (generally speaking all build failures
are short-lived and you should try updating again before posting a
question). Please re-cvsup and try again.

Kris

--nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6eGByWry0BWjoQKURAkeTAJoDCvB9x8tEh/5aV9mzpVjcpEmEKQCgmFFC
P55taAL9mV3a8wp1gJUSffE=
=2Rvj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--nFreZHaLTZJo0R7j--


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 31 11:41:16 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from gilmore.nas.nasa.gov (gilmore.nas.nasa.gov [129.99.32.17])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4DF637B4EC
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 11:40:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gilmore.nas.nasa.gov (IDENT:RqwIzMKAQtpF3IYlYrFG6U3R0hKz9vmt@localhost.nas.nasa.gov [127.0.0.1])
	by gilmore.nas.nasa.gov (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f0VJelV81047;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 11:40:48 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from tweten@nas.nasa.gov)
Message-Id: <200101311940.f0VJelV81047@gilmore.nas.nasa.gov>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 with nmh-1.0.4
Reply-To: tweten@nas.nasa.gov
To: Helge Oldach <Helge.Oldach@de.origin-it.com>
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Stable Isn't, for VLB 486 
From: Dave Tweten <tweten@nas.nasa.gov>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 11:40:46 -0800
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Initially quoting me, Helge.Oldach@de.origin-it.com said:
>>	ahc0: <Adapted 284X SCSI adapter> at 0x8c00-0x8cff, irq 10 (edge)
        -------------^

>:-)

What can I say.  If I could type, I'ds be dangerous.

>>	Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
>>	fault virtual address	= 0x40

>Justin had MFC'd patches to STABLE on 28th January which should fix this. 

Yes.  Yesterday, I discovered the entry in the commit archives, re-cvsupped, 
and my 486 is still doing a buildworld.  Buildkernel, installkernel, et.al., 
are still to come.  The machine is just a 486, after all.  I'll let the list 
know whether the new kernel works.

Thanks for the notice.
-- 
M/S 258-5                     | 1024-bit PGP fingerprint: | tweten@nas.nasa.gov
NASA Ames Research Center     |  41 B0 89 0A  8F 94 6C 59 |      (650) 604-4416
Moffett Field, CA  94035-1000 |  7C 80 10 20  25 C7 2F E6 | FAX: (650) 604-4377
We each earn what freedom of speech we defend for those who most offend us.




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 31 12:59:30 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from www.golsyd.net.au (golsyd.net.au [203.57.20.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E27037B65D
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 12:59:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [203.164.12.28] by www.quake.com.au (NTMail 4.30.0012/AB6169.63.5724aadf) with ESMTP id jnaaaaaa for <stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 07:58:33 +1100
Message-ID: <3A787CB9.864E381E@quake.com.au>
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 07:59:37 +1100
From: Kal Torak <kaltorak@quake.com.au>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Pete French <pfrench@firstcallgroup.co.uk>
Cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ssh problem upgrading to 4.2-stable
References: <E14NvdS-0000dc-00@dilbert.fcg.co.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Pete French wrote:
> 
> So, yesterday we upgraded the last machine running 3.5 here to 4.2 stable
> (CVSuped on saturday I believe). All went very smoothly and everything runs
> fine except for ssh. We are using openssh, and it rejects peoples
> passwords with "Permission denied, please try again."
> 
> I seem to recall reading that password encryptionc hanged from MD5 to DES
> between 3.x and 4.x - and I suspect this could be the problem. The
> /usr/lib/libcrypt.so file is a link to libdescrypt.so, so I assume
> we are now using DES passwords. Old users have MD5 passwords, but new
> users are created with DES passwords. Using 'passwd' however converts them
> to MD5. I have checked auth.conf, mailing list archives and done a web
> search and am running out of ideas.

Well besides the problem with /etc/pam.conf if you didnt install the new one,
you can choose what password format you want use in /etc/login.conf by using
the line passwd_format=md5 or des...

Also as a side note, the des libs understand both des and md5 crypts, but the
md5 libs only understand md5 crypt...

Good luck!
Kal.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 31 14:18:22 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from smtp1.sentex.ca (smtp1.sentex.ca [199.212.134.4])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8532837B65D; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 14:18:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from simoeon.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [209.112.4.47])
	by smtp1.sentex.ca (8.11.2/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f0VMI0l63195;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 17:18:00 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Message-Id: <5.0.1.4.0.20010131170922.02cdeec0@marble.sentex.ca>
X-Sender: mdtpop@marble.sentex.ca
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.1
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 17:11:35 -0500
To: stable@freebsd.org
From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
Subject: /dev/ast0 ?
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


Is there any reason why I would not be able to create /dev/ast0 ?

ata0-master: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 compliant cable
ad0: 14324MB <QUANTUM FIREBALLP LM15> [29104/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA33
ad1: 6149MB <QUANTUM FIREBALL EX6.4A> [13328/15/63] at ata0-slave UDMA33
ast0: TAPE <OnStream DI-30> at ata1-master using WDMA2
Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a

ruby2# cd /dev
ruby2# sh MAKEDEV ast0
ruby2# ls -l ast*
ls: No match.
ruby2# uname -a
FreeBSD ruby2.sentex.ca 4.2-STABLE FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE #0: Wed Jan 31 
17:03:59 EST 
2001     mdtancsa@ruby2.sentex.ca:/usr/src/sys/compile/ruby.en  i386



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 31 14:26:56 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from winnie.fit.edu (fit.edu [163.118.5.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D19837B491
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 14:26:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: from netzero.net (rm305w-b.campbell.fit.edu [163.118.216.112])
	by winnie.fit.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA24589
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 17:27:17 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <3A789142.30885D82@netzero.net>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 17:27:14 -0500
From: Kevin Brunelle <kruptos@netzero.net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Printer locks system.
References: <E14NvdS-0000dc-00@dilbert.fcg.co.uk> <3A787CB9.864E381E@quake.com.au>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Okay everyone,

I am running a system compiled just yesterday -- but the exact date may
not be important, as this issue has occurred before. I did not bring it
up then because I was unable to replicate it. I am still having trouble
replicating this problem and it doesn't bother me that much. This is
just a heads up and a request for info. Well, I suppose I should tell
you what happened. ;-)

I was printing a document and my printer (Canon BJC-6000) ran out of
paper. As soon as this happened everything locked up. The music I was
playing stopped, the mouse could not be moved, keyboard just sat there,
everything just paused. As soon as I put paper in and pressed the resume
button everything went back on its way as if nothing had happened. As I
said, this is the second time it has happened -- but I have not been
able to replicate it on purpose. It has been several weeks since the
last time it happened. I cvsup and rebuild on a regular basis so I just
assumed that it had been fixed, until now.

Okay some more info. I forget exactly what was running, but here are
some things I know were:
xfce
GQmpeg
Netscape
everybuddy

[all the regular background stuff not associated with X (daemons and
such)]

I just want to know what could be causing this. For me it is no big
deal. I put more paper in and away I go, but I imagine this could cause
problems for some people. I forgot the see if I could kill the window
manager or change back to a console; so those might have been working.
If you have any ideas, or need more information I will provide all I
know. Just ask away.

Thanks in advance for all the information and ideas you can give me on
this.

Kevin Brunelle
-- 
"Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins,
for they are subtle and quick to anger."


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 31 14:30:35 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from pan.ch.intel.com (pan.ch.intel.com [143.182.246.24])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D00437B65D
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 14:30:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sedona.intel.com (sedona.ch.intel.com [143.182.218.21])
	by pan.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a+p1/8.9.1/d: relay.m4,v 1.33 2000/11/21 19:27:27 smothers Exp $) with ESMTP id PAA04372;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 15:30:05 -0700 (MST)
Received: from hip186.ch.intel.com (hip186.ch.intel.com [143.182.225.68])
	by sedona.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: sendmail.cf,v 1.14 2001/01/02 18:39:59 steved Exp $) with ESMTP id PAA21904;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 15:30:04 -0700 (MST)
X-Envelope-From: jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com
Received: (from jreynold@localhost)
	by hip186.ch.intel.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1/d: client.m4,v 1.3 1998/09/29 16:36:11 sedayao Exp sedayao $) id RAA24425;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 17:30:04 -0500 (EST)
X-Authentication-Warning: hip186.ch.intel.com: jreynold set sender to jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com using -f
From: John Reynolds~ <jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <14968.37355.936215.987185@hip186.ch.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 15:30:03 -0700 (MST)
To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
Cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: /dev/ast0 ?
In-Reply-To: <5.0.1.4.0.20010131170922.02cdeec0@marble.sentex.ca>
References: <5.0.1.4.0.20010131170922.02cdeec0@marble.sentex.ca>
X-Mailer: VM 6.75 under Emacs 20.6.3
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


[ On Wednesday, January 31, Mike Tancsa wrote: ]
> 
> Is there any reason why I would not be able to create /dev/ast0 ?
> 
> ata0-master: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 compliant cable
> ad0: 14324MB <QUANTUM FIREBALLP LM15> [29104/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA33
> ad1: 6149MB <QUANTUM FIREBALL EX6.4A> [13328/15/63] at ata0-slave UDMA33
> ast0: TAPE <OnStream DI-30> at ata1-master using WDMA2
> Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a
> 
> ruby2# cd /dev
> ruby2# sh MAKEDEV ast0
> ruby2# ls -l ast*
> ls: No match.
> ruby2# uname -a
> FreeBSD ruby2.sentex.ca 4.2-STABLE FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE #0: Wed Jan 31 
> 17:03:59 EST 
> 2001     mdtancsa@ruby2.sentex.ca:/usr/src/sys/compile/ruby.en  i386
> 

dolphin [/dev]<102>% sh MAKEDEV ast0
dolphin [/dev]<103>% ll *ast*
crw-r-----   1 root     operator 119,   1 Jan 31 15:27 nrast0
crw-r-----   1 root     operator 119,   0 Jan 31 15:27 rast0

They're there ... just don't start with "ast". You'll probably want "nrast0"
for your dump device as that's the non-rewinding version.

Now, don't ask me why on the SCSI side of the fence I have an "sa0" device
file to go along with my nrsa0, ersa0, rsa0, etc. nodes. But, your files
should be there .....

-Jr

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
| John Reynolds               WCCG, CCE, Higher Levels of Abstraction       |
| Intel Corporation   MS: CH6-210   Phone: 480-554-9092   pgr: 602-868-6512 |
| jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com  http://www-aec.ch.intel.com/~jreynold/      |
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 31 14:55:18 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from athena.unlimitedweb.net (athena.unlimitedweb.net [63.126.245.161])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0752437B4EC
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 14:54:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 9000a (bender-rcc.resnet.uni.edu [134.161.64.15])
	by athena.unlimitedweb.net (8.11.1/8.9.3) with SMTP id f0VMtPA70869
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 16:55:26 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from bierblb@netins.net)
From: "Brent" <bierblb@netins.net>
To: <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Updating to 4.2-STABLE with CVSUP
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 16:54:32 -0600
Message-ID: <CLEBKGOHKNELHPEDDJJIOEEDCIAA.bierblb@netins.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2910.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Importance: Normal
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

I am confused of what prefix to use.

I used "*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_4_2" and it started to delete all
the dir
then I tried "*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_4_2_0_STABLE" and that didn't
work either.  If you do "*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_4" how do you know
if it is updating to 4.2-STABLE and not 4.?-STABLE when it would come out?

Thanks in advance!

Brent Bierstedt



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 31 15: 2: 2 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from utterlux.hq.communitconnect.com (unknown [206.28.215.90])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA14B37B65D
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 15:01:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (marius@localhost)
	by utterlux.hq.communitconnect.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f0VN1d949695;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 18:01:39 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from marius@mail.communityconnect.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: utterlux.hq.communitconnect.com: marius owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 18:01:39 -0500 (EST)
From: Marius <marius@mail.communityconnect.com>
X-Sender: marius@utterlux.hq.communitconnect.com
To: Brent <bierblb@netins.net>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Updating to 4.2-STABLE with CVSUP
In-Reply-To: <CLEBKGOHKNELHPEDDJJIOEEDCIAA.bierblb@netins.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101311758090.33333-100000@utterlux.hq.communitconnect.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


The tag you want is:
*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_4

The current -Stable branch of 4.x is 4.2-Stable.  If you wanted an
eariler version of -Stable, you could perhaps suppliment the above with a
"date" tag, but why would you?

If you want the lastest/current -Stable in the 4.x branch, you use the
above tag. 

-Marius M. Rex 
 
 On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Brent wrote:

> I am confused of what prefix to use.
> 
> I used "*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_4_2" and it started to delete all
> the dir
> then I tried "*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_4_2_0_STABLE" and that didn't
> work either.  If you do "*default release=cvs tag=RELENG_4" how do you know
> if it is updating to 4.2-STABLE and not 4.?-STABLE when it would come out?
> 
> Thanks in advance!
> 
> Brent Bierstedt
> 
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 31 16:13:38 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from utterlux.hq.communitconnect.com (unknown [206.28.215.90])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9C35C37B4EC; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 16:13:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (marius@localhost)
	by utterlux.hq.communitconnect.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f110D9l52099;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 19:13:14 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from marius@mail.communityconnect.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: utterlux.hq.communitconnect.com: marius owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 19:13:09 -0500 (EST)
From: Marius <marius@mail.communityconnect.com>
X-Sender: marius@utterlux.hq.communitconnect.com
To: stable@FreeBSD.org
Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Multiple dropped thttpd connections under high load.
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101311850220.51115-100000@utterlux.hq.communitconnect.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


My company has a number of FreeBSD 3.5-Stable servers running thttpd
2.2.17, they happily buzz along under very high load.  (With a
'options NMBCLUSTERS=8192' in the kernel config to give us some
serious mbufs.)  

So a few months back I went ahead and upgraded one of the servers to
4.x-Stable.  It currently is running 4.1.1-Stable.  (But I am upgrading it 
now to 4.2-Stable as I write.  Some of those recent security advisories
struck a chord.)

Anyway, since upgrading from 3.5-Stable to 4.1.1.-Stable the performance
of the machine and it's webserver has been flakey whe under higher load.  Under
calmer conditions it works fine, but when the traffic raises we get a high
occurance of dropped connections.  Even just telneting to the webserver
from the local host can create a dropped conection.  (Sometimes as it is
contecting the webserver, and sometimes while it is trying to fulfill the
requests.)  The 3.5-Stable machines don't exhibit this behavior. 

The problem of dropped connections has become so common that I have been
told to take it out of service.   But I really want to get it back into
service.  Someday thttpd will have support for 'accept filters' and I want
to be ready.  I could -so- use them.

I am running the same thttpd binary as I did on 3.5-Stable.  I copied over
a fresh image from a companion machine recently.  Since it works under
light/medium load on the machine, I didn't think it needed to be
recompiled. 

mbuff (netstat -m) usage can be high, but I don't think I am running out
of them.  I've never seen it at more the 75%.  

Does anybody have some suggestions for improving/tuning things to work
better?  I know this situation is rather specific, if everybody was having
problems like this, there would be PR's on file, but I can't find any.
And I can't remember any chatter like this in recent months on Stable.        

Any suggestions/educated-guesses would be appreciated.  

-Marius M. Rex




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 31 16:55:36 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from wyattearp.stanford.edu (wyattearp.Stanford.EDU [171.64.180.171])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 224AD37B698
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 16:55:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from richw@localhost)
	by wyattearp.stanford.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA67439;
	Wed, 31 Jan 2001 16:55:00 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from richw)
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 16:55:00 -0800 (PST)
From: Rich Wales <richw@webcom.com>
X-Sender: richw@wyattearp.stanford.edu
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Can't get a crash dump?!?
Message-ID: <20010201005033.67288.richw@wyattearp.stanford.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Following up on my message of last week, about not being able to get
my 4.2-STABLE system to produce a crash dump:

I finally managed to get a dump by typing "call dumpsys" at the DDB
prompt.  (Thanks to Bosko Milekic for this suggestion.)

I'm still perplexed that the more conventional approaches (such as
typing "continue" at the DDB prompt) gave me a type-12 trap (page
fault in kernel mode) instead of dumping.

Rich Wales         richw@webcom.com         http://www.webcom.com/richw/



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 31 17:59:34 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from bitbucket.extern.uniface.nl (bitbucket.extern.uniface.nl [193.78.88.139])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63AD537B6A8
	for <stable@FreeBSD.org>; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 17:59:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bh2.nl.compuware.com (unknown [172.16.17.82])
	by bitbucket.extern.uniface.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3B136828E; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 02:59:15 +0100 (CET)
Received: from trashcan.nl.compuware.com ([172.16.16.52]) by bh2.nl.compuware.com with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2650.21)
	id 1BLPQZH2; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 02:59:15 +0100
Received: from c1111.nl.compuware.com (c1111.nl.compuware.com [172.16.16.36])
	by trashcan.nl.compuware.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B8CE6145A4; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 02:59:14 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 02:59:14 +0100 (CET)
From: Bert Driehuis <driehuis@playbeing.org>
X-Sender: bertd@c1111.nl.compuware.com
To: Marius <marius@mail.communityconnect.com>
Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: Multiple dropped thttpd connections under high load.
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101311850220.51115-100000@utterlux.hq.communitconnect.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSI.4.21.0102010251380.23599-100000@c1111.nl.compuware.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Wed, 31 Jan 2001, Marius wrote:

> My company has a number of FreeBSD 3.5-Stable servers running thttpd
> 2.2.17, they happily buzz along under very high load.  (With a
> 'options NMBCLUSTERS=8192' in the kernel config to give us some
> serious mbufs.)  

Did you verify that your kernel options are comparable? I sometimes get
bitten by forgetting to move tweaks like kern.maxfiles to an upgraded
system.

I presume you checked dmesg for clues. If you're lucky, running ktrace
-idp on the process for a brief while (and quickly ktrace -C when you've
reproduced the issue :-) will yield a clue.

Cheers,

					-- Bert
-- 
Bert Driehuis -- driehuis@playbeing.org -- +31-20-3116119
If the only tool you've got is an axe, every problem looks like fun!



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 31 18:55:50 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (216-118-21-146.pdq.net [216.118.21.146])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1117F37B699; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 18:55:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dwcjr (DWCJR.inethouston.net [216.118.21.147])
	by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6FFE7177E3F; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 20:55:34 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <012101c08bfa$6ff0a2a0$931576d8@inethouston.net>
From: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net>
To: "Marius" <marius@mail.communityconnect.com>, <stable@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: <questions@FreeBSD.org>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101311850220.51115-100000@utterlux.hq.communitconnect.com>
Subject: Re: Multiple dropped thttpd connections under high load.
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 20:55:30 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> I am running the same thttpd binary as I did on 3.5-Stable.  I copied over
> a fresh image from a companion machine recently.  Since it works under
> light/medium load on the machine, I didn't think it needed to be
> recompiled. 

One thing to try is to recompile it and rule that out.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Wed Jan 31 22:11: 4 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from cage.simianscience.com (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 437B037B684; Wed, 31 Jan 2001 22:10:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from root@localhost)
	by cage.simianscience.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f116Aii93178;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 01:10:44 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Received: from chimp (fcage [192.168.0.2])
	by cage.simianscience.com (8.11.1/8.11.1av) with ESMTP id f116Ace93170;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 01:10:39 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Message-Id: <4.2.2.20010201010331.02374eb0@marble.sentex.net>
X-Sender: mdtancsa@marble.sentex.net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2 
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 01:10:38 -0500
To: John Reynolds~ <jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com>
From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
Subject: Re: /dev/ast0 ?
Cc: stable@freebsd.org, sos@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <14968.37355.936215.987185@hip186.ch.intel.com>
References: <5.0.1.4.0.20010131170922.02cdeec0@marble.sentex.ca>
 <5.0.1.4.0.20010131170922.02cdeec0@marble.sentex.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-10
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

At 03:30 PM 1/31/2001 -0700, John Reynolds~ wrote:
>dolphin [/dev]<102>% sh MAKEDEV ast0
>dolphin [/dev]<103>% ll *ast*
>crw-r-----   1 root     operator 119,   1 Jan 31 15:27 nrast0
>crw-r-----   1 root     operator 119,   0 Jan 31 15:27 rast0
>
>They're there ... just don't start with "ast". You'll probably want "nrast0"
>for your dump device as that's the non-rewinding version.
>
>Now, don't ask me why on the SCSI side of the fence I have an "sa0" device
>file to go along with my nrsa0, ersa0, rsa0, etc. nodes. But, your files
>should be there .....


Thanks!  You know I could have swore I tried that :-(  I think I got 
fixated on the man page which states

FILES
      /dev/ad*                 ATA disk device nodes
      /dev/acd*                ATAPI CD-ROM device nodes
      /dev/afd*                ATAPI floppy drive device nodes
      /dev/ast*                ATAPI tape drive device nodes

Perhaps an update to the manpage to clarify ?

      /dev/ast*                ATAPI tape drive device nodes
      /dev/rast*               ATAPI tape drive device nodes
--------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike Tancsa,                          	          tel +1 519 651 3400
Network Administration,     			  mike@sentex.net
Sentex Communications                 		  www.sentex.net
Cambridge, Ontario Canada			  www.sentex.net/mike



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  0:27:18 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from caamora.caamora.com.au (caamora.caamora.com.au [203.7.226.2])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CB3E37B4EC
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 00:26:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from jon@localhost)
	by caamora.caamora.com.au (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f118QrP11136
	for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 19:26:53 +1100 (EST)
Message-ID: <20010201192650.A10624@caamora.com.au>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 19:26:50 +1100
From: jonathan michaels <jon@caamora.caamora.com.au>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: support for v2.2-stable
Reply-To: jon@caamora.com.au
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD caamora.caamora.com.au 2.2.8-RELEASE FreeBSD 2.2.8-RELEASE
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

all,

i am still running an old freebsd v2.2-stable and as time goes on and freebsd 
get further away from my hardware platform, i believe tat their are many 
people in my position, though not as vocal as i am about it, sometimes grin.

how hard is it to retrofit things like named, sendmail and some of the other 
stuff need to make it all hang together. though i'm more concerned about the 
kernel stuff than the other bits that i'm able to "make" from sources, to date.

i'd apreciate responces cc:'d as i'm no longer subscribed to freebsd-stable, 
for reasons of resource management.

with regards and apreciations.

jonathan

-- 



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  1: 0:25 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7431D37B4EC
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 01:00:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr [134.157.10.1])
          by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.10.0/jtpda-5.3.3) with ESMTP id f118xwq13745
          for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 09:59:59 +0100 (CET)
Received: from rose.lpthe.jussieu.fr (root@[134.157.10.102])
          by parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (8.11.1/jtpda-5.3.1) with ESMTP id f118xv304060
          for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 09:59:57 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from michel@localhost)
	by rose.lpthe.jussieu.fr (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f118xwm00481
	for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 09:59:58 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from michel)
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 09:59:57 +0100
From: Michel Talon <michel@lpthe.jussieu.fr>
To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: URG: IPFW and kernel msgbuf corruption
Message-ID: <20010201095957.A469@lpthe.jussieu.fr>
Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
References: <3A784846.27E560E9@jonny.eng.br>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0pre2i
In-Reply-To: <3A784846.27E560E9@jonny.eng.br>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 03:15:51PM -0200, Joao Carlos Mendes Luis wrote:
> Hi,
> 
>     I've seen some messages in the mail archives about this, but none got to
> the real problem!  FreeBSD -stable from yesterday (2000.01.30) has a bug in
> ipfw logging that corrupts kernel msgbuf (dmesg) area.  Maybe some other
> modules have this bug also, but I could not reproduce them.  This bug is
> definitely not present in 4.2-RELEASE, as I have downgraded my system with
> cvsup and repeated the tests.
> 
>     My test procedure is to attack my test system with nmap, and look for the
> ipfw log messages.  They corrupt the whole msgbuf area, like this:
> 
> bash-2.04# dmesg
> >ipfw: 20050 Deny TCP 200.255.125.133:39372 200.255.125.137:6007 in via fxp0
> bash-2.04#
> 
>     Only one line of messages?  I have 80k of message buffer defined:
> 

I had dmesg corruption recently. I have redone make buildworld make
buildkernel make installkernel make installworld and the corruption
disappeared. Perhaps you had incorrectly synchronized world
and kernel.

-- 
Michel Talon


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  1: 1:53 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from ntdub0e.trintech.com (gatekeeper.trintech.com [212.120.150.50])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2786F37B491
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 01:01:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by ntdub0e.trintech.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
	id <1CMGHPQ3>; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 09:03:32 -0000
Message-ID: <F4F6A84AB884D31198F20008C724FD4A1ABE0F@ntdub0e.trintech.com>
From: Daniel Brady <daniel.brady@trintech.com>
To: "'past@netmode.ntua.gr'" <past@netmode.ntua.gr>,
	Daniel Brady <daniel.brady@trintech.com>
Cc: "'freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG'" <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: RE: Problem with Null Modem connection
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 09:03:28 -0000 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2448.0)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-7"
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hi again
Got it fixed, I had an /usr/local/etc/rc.d/xdm.sh script starting, this
seemed to stop the getty processes.  I activated the xdm tty:
ttyv8   "/usr/X11R6/bin/xdm -nodaemon"  xterm   on  secure

This fixed the getty problem so now they all apear in the ps list, including
the ttys

Thanks for the help
Daniel

-----Original Message-----
From: Panagiotis Astithas [mailto:past@netmode.ntua.gr]
Sent: 31 January 2001 15:30
To: Daniel Brady
Cc: 'freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG'
Subject: Re: Problem with Null Modem connection


On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 12:53:11PM -0000, Daniel Brady wrote:
> The other machine (winnt laptop) is set t0 9600 8-N-1 I had originally
tried
> with dialup in the /etc/ttys.  I don't see the getty process running. I
> thought this was odd but I assumed that the process was not spawned untill
> data was detected on the relevant port

Actually the getty process will detect the data on the serial port and
act accordingly. Perhaps when you do 'kill -1 1' some error messages
are logged in /var/log/{messages,console}? Is any other getty process
running? Maybe there is some syntax error in /etc/ttys? I have never 
experienced such behavior so I am rather guessing at this moment.

-past


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  1: 3:23 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from nu.org (sof23483-5.gw.connect.com.au [210.9.104.198])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7E0D37B503
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 01:03:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from blue.nu.org (blue.nu.org [202.12.75.5])
	by nu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id D0A631166A; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 20:02:58 +1100 (EST)
Received: by blue.nu.org (Postfix, from userid 342)
	id A0DE92EF; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 20:02:57 +1100 (EST)
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 20:02:57 +1100
From: Christopher Vance <vance@nu.org>
To: jon@caamora.com.au
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: support for v2.2-stable
Message-ID: <20010201200257.A45955@nu.org>
References: <20010201192650.A10624@caamora.com.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20010201192650.A10624@caamora.com.au>; from jon@caamora.caamora.com.au on Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 07:26:50PM +1100
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 07:26:50PM +1100, jonathan michaels wrote:
: i'd apreciate responces cc:'d as i'm no longer subscribed to freebsd-stable, 
: for reasons of resource management.

You must be really tight.  I've been running 4-STABLE on a 386 with 8M
memory, although I'm now using a 486 as my normal bottom-of-line
machine.  I did have problems moving from 3-S to 4-S with one of my
ethernet cards, but I now have that as a spare for my WfW box.

I don't know how much longer they'll support 3-STABLE, but I wouldn't
expect too many ports to build any more.

-- 
Christopher Vance


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  2:16:10 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.arc.net.my (nagano.arc.net.my [203.115.225.22])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B08A837B67D
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 02:15:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from arc.net.my ([203.115.227.134]) by mail.arc.net.my
          (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id G82PU700.253 for
          <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 18:15:43 +0800 
Message-ID: <3A7938AB.2C845652@arc.net.my>
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 18:21:31 +0800
From: Yaresham Saaya <yaresham@arc.net.my>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE i386)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: cvsup to 4.2-stable & ports problem
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hi everybody!

I just cvsup my system from 4.1.1 to 4.2-stable.
Then I also cvsup my ports. But then I can't
install anything thru this new ports. This error message
appear.

"Error: your port uses an old layout.  Please update it to match this
bsd.port.mk."

How to solve this?

Thanks in advance.

Yaresham





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  2:19:28 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from nevermind.kiev.ua (office.imt.com.ua [212.109.53.33])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6B9237B698
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 02:19:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from never@localhost)
	by nevermind.kiev.ua (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f11AIuU08928;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:18:56 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from never)
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:18:56 +0200
From: Nevermind <never@nevermind.kiev.ua>
To: Yaresham Saaya <yaresham@arc.net.my>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: cvsup to 4.2-stable & ports problem
Message-ID: <20010201121856.A8383@nevermind.kiev.ua>
References: <3A7938AB.2C845652@arc.net.my>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <3A7938AB.2C845652@arc.net.my>; from yaresham@arc.net.my on Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 06:21:31PM +0800
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hello, Yaresham Saaya!

On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 06:21:31PM +0800, you wrote:

> Hi everybody!
> 
> I just cvsup my system from 4.1.1 to 4.2-stable.
> Then I also cvsup my ports. But then I can't
> install anything thru this new ports. This error message
> appear.
> 
> "Error: your port uses an old layout.  Please update it to match this
> bsd.port.mk."
> 
> How to solve this?
Go to http://www.freebsd.org/ports/ and download upgrade kit.

-- 
Alexandr P. Kovalenko	http://nevermind.kiev.ua/
NEVE-RIPE


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  2:57:28 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.ZSEA.zp.ua (ZSEA.zp.ua [212.8.40.5])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE37E37B491
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 02:57:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from laa@localhost)
	by mx1.ZSEA.zp.ua (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f11Aujh04239;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:56:45 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from laa@laa.zp.ua)
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:56:45 +0200
From: "Alexandr A. Listopad" <laa@laa.zp.ua>
To: Yaresham Saaya <yaresham@arc.net.my>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: cvsup to 4.2-stable & ports problem
Message-ID: <20010201125645.A4171@laa.zp.ua>
References: <3A7938AB.2C845652@arc.net.my>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <3A7938AB.2C845652@arc.net.my>; from yaresham@arc.net.my on Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 06:21:31PM +0800
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 06:21:31PM +0800, Yaresham Saaya wrote:
> Hi everybody!
> 
> I just cvsup my system from 4.1.1 to 4.2-stable.
> Then I also cvsup my ports. But then I can't
> install anything thru this new ports. This error message
> appear.
> 
> "Error: your port uses an old layout.  Please update it to match this
> bsd.port.mk."
> 
> How to solve this?

what about ports-base in ports-supfile? and src-share in
stable-supfile?

-- 
 Laa


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  4:28: 2 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from eng05.embratel.net.br (eng05.embratel.net.br [200.255.125.133])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 0A34837B684; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 04:27:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jonny.eng.br (willow [200.255.125.142])
	by eng05.embratel.net.br (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 8F54A24D2C; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 10:27:36 -0200 (BRST)
Message-ID: <3A795660.687791E6@jonny.eng.br>
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 10:28:16 -0200
From: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis <jonny@jonny.eng.br>
Organization: Internet via Embratel
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Yusuf Goolamabbas <yusufg@outblaze.com>
Cc: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@aciri.org>, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG,
	freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Bridging and dummynet seems to destroy dmesg output
References: <3A787124.B307EC20@jonny.eng.br> <200101312012.f0VKCGB07532@iguana.aciri.org> <20010201135551.A13446@outblaze.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

CC: -stable, this seens not to be a -net related problem.

Yusuf Goolamabbas wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >     I sent these files in private.  But I remembered that I have another
> > > unusual config in this machine: is is multiprocessed, and has 10 SCSI disks
> > > and lots of SYSV shared memory.
> >
> > i think SMP might have something to do with it. Yusuf, are you also
> > using an SMP box ?
> 
> No, I am using a "book-PC" type machine [small Celeron] dmesg attached
> 
> I reinstalled my shaper box with 4.2 release today and cvsuped to
> 4.2-stable.
> 
> The strange thing is that if I turn on verbose logging (via sysctl) but
> don't turn on verbose_limit, dmesg seems to get corrupted. If I have
> verbose_limit set to say 10, dmesg works and does not get overridden
> with log messages from ipfw [which goes to /var/log/security]
> 
> This is what I have in my /etc/sysctl.conf
> 
> net.link.ether.bridge_ipfw=1
> net.link.ether.bridge=1
> net.inet.ip.fw.verbose=1
> net.inet.ip.fw.verbose_limit=10
> 
> So, it seems some combination of verbose logging and non setting of
> verbose limit [or the default setting of verbose limit] is causing this
> problem

    Indeed, the problem does not start at the very first message.  It takes
some time, after I start the nmap attack, to corrupt the buffer.  You
observation may just mean that the number of messages needed to corrupt the
buffer is greater than 10.  Maybe even this is the reason Luigi does not see
any problem with picobsd.

    The fact that GENERIC also shows this problem is banging on my head.  Why
nobody else has seen this?  What kind of kernel messages create this problem? 
IIRC IPFW does not use any kind of printf, just log(9).  What other kernels
modules use this function?  How could we generate such messages to test?

    Just in case nobody has yet noticed, this is for sure a case of lost
pointer.  And if the kernel is not yet crashing is just mere luck!  Time to
audit changes since -release?

    I'd love to help more, but I've been far from FreeBSD cvs lists for a long
time now.

                                        Jonny

-- 
Joćo Carlos Mendes Luķs                 jonny@embratel.net.br
  Networking Engineer                   jonny@jonny.eng.br
 Internet via Embratel			jcml@ieee.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  5: 7:28 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from web4406.mail.yahoo.com (web4406.mail.yahoo.com [216.115.105.37])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 63C2437B65D
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 05:07:11 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <20010201130711.27533.qmail@web4406.mail.yahoo.com>
Received: from [200.201.158.33] by web4406.mail.yahoo.com; Thu, 01 Feb 2001 05:07:11 PST
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 05:07:11 -0800 (PST)
From: Eraldo Jr <eraldo_j@yahoo.com>
Subject: - i810 is only supported on Linux/x86 -
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

This is real ?

***********************************************
http://www.xfree86.org/4.0.2/Status17.html#17

17. Intel

3.3.6:
Support (accelerated) for the Intel i740 is provided
by the XF86_SVGA server with the i740 driver, and for
the Intel i810 with the i810 driver. The i810 is
currently only supported on Linux, and requires the
agpgart.o kernel module in order to use modes that
require more than 1MB of video memory.

4.0.2:
Support (accelerated) for the Intel i740 is provided
by the "i740" driver, and support for the Intel i810
is provided by the "i810" driver. The "i810" driver is
currently Linux-only, and requires the agpgart.o
kernel module.

Summary:
The i740 and i810 are supported in both versions, but
the i810 is only supported on Linux/x86 platforms at
present.

*****************************************************

Thanks !

Eraldo Jr


__________________________________________________
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 
a year!  http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  5:18: 3 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.telepass.co.jp (ns.telepass.co.jp [211.9.36.161])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 56B8937B4EC
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 05:17:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 48247 invoked from network); 1 Feb 2001 13:15:07 -0000
Received: from mimu.telepass.co.jp (HELO localhost) (211.9.36.169)
  by ns.telepass.co.jp with SMTP; 1 Feb 2001 13:15:07 -0000
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: - i810 is only supported on Linux/x86 -
In-Reply-To: <20010201130711.27533.qmail@web4406.mail.yahoo.com>
References: <20010201130711.27533.qmail@web4406.mail.yahoo.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.94 on Emacs 19.34 / Mule 2.3 (SUETSUMUHANA)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <20010201221738Y.mimu@msdj.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 22:17:38 +0900
From: Shigeki Mimura <mimu@msdj.com>
X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140)
Lines: 4
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


> This is real ?

Yes.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  5:36:21 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from nebula.cybercable.fr (d217.dhcp212-126.cybercable.fr [212.198.126.217])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FDB737B699
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 05:36:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from mux@localhost)
	by nebula.cybercable.fr (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f11DaAR00404;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 14:36:10 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from mux)
From: Maxime Henrion <mux@qualys.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 14:36:09 +0100
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Cc: Eraldo Jr <eraldo_j@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: - i810 is only supported on Linux/x86 -
Message-ID: <20010201143609.A351@nebula.cybercable.fr>
References: <20010201130711.27533.qmail@web4406.mail.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20010201130711.27533.qmail@web4406.mail.yahoo.com>; from eraldo_j@yahoo.com on Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 05:07:11AM -0800
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Eraldo Jr wrote:
> This is real ?

No, there is an agp.ko kernel module for FreeBSD which provides a /dev/agpgart
and thus allows FreeBSD users to run XFree with such cards.

> ***********************************************
> http://www.xfree86.org/4.0.2/Status17.html#17
> 
> 17. Intel
> 
> 3.3.6:
> Support (accelerated) for the Intel i740 is provided
> by the XF86_SVGA server with the i740 driver, and for
> the Intel i810 with the i810 driver. The i810 is
> currently only supported on Linux, and requires the
> agpgart.o kernel module in order to use modes that
> require more than 1MB of video memory.
> 
> 4.0.2:
> Support (accelerated) for the Intel i740 is provided
> by the "i740" driver, and support for the Intel i810
> is provided by the "i810" driver. The "i810" driver is
> currently Linux-only, and requires the agpgart.o
> kernel module.
> 
> Summary:
> The i740 and i810 are supported in both versions, but
> the i810 is only supported on Linux/x86 platforms at
> present.
> 
> *****************************************************
> 
> Thanks !
> 
> Eraldo Jr
-- 
Don't be fooled by cheap finnish imitations ; BSD is the One True Code
Key fingerprint = F9B6 1D5A 4963 331C 88FC  CA6A AB50 1EF2 8CBE 99D6
Public Key : http://www.epita.fr/~henrio_m/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  5:44:25 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from juil.domain (unknown [194.226.17.51])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D45A937B6A0
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 05:44:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by juil.domain (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id B12FDE7; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 16:44:11 +0300 (MSK)
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: - i810 is only supported on Linux/x86 -
References: <20010201130711.27533.qmail@web4406.mail.yahoo.com>
	<20010201221738Y.mimu@msdj.com>
From: Ilya Martynov <m_ilya@agava.com>
Date: 01 Feb 2001 16:44:11 +0300
In-Reply-To: <20010201221738Y.mimu@msdj.com>
Message-ID: <86elxisel0.fsf@juil.domain>
Lines: 11
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>>>>> "SM" == Shigeki Mimura <mimu@msdj.com> writes:

    >> This is real ?

    SM> Yes.

No. I've i810 and I've XFree86 4.02 installed from ports. It works ok. 

-- 
Ilya Martynov
AGAVA Software Company, http://www.agava.com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  6: 4: 2 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (whale.sunbay.crimea.ua [212.110.138.65])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36FB737B6AC
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 06:03:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from ru@localhost)
	by whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (8.11.0/8.11.0) id f11E33v39747;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 16:03:03 +0200 (EET)
	(envelope-from ru)
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 16:03:03 +0200
From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG>
To: Eraldo Jr <eraldo_j@yahoo.com>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: - i810 is only supported on Linux/x86 -
Message-ID: <20010201160303.A38766@sunbay.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Eraldo Jr <eraldo_j@yahoo.com>,
	freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
References: <20010201130711.27533.qmail@web4406.mail.yahoo.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20010201130711.27533.qmail@web4406.mail.yahoo.com>; from eraldo_j@yahoo.com on Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 05:07:11AM -0800
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 05:07:11AM -0800, Eraldo Jr wrote:
> This is real ?
> 
> ***********************************************
> http://www.xfree86.org/4.0.2/Status17.html#17
> 
No, this information is obsolete.

FreeBSD had support for running XFree86 4.0.X on i810
starting with 4.1-RELEASE.

XFree86 supports FreeBSD on i810 natively starting with
release 4.0.2.

This could be checked with both FreeBSD and XFree86 CVS
logs.

I have no idea why they have not updated the information.


Cheers,
-- 
Ruslan Ermilov		Oracle Developer/DBA,
ru@sunbay.com		Sunbay Software AG,
ru@FreeBSD.org		FreeBSD committer,
+380.652.512.251	Simferopol, Ukraine

http://www.FreeBSD.org	The Power To Serve
http://www.oracle.com	Enabling The Information Age


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  6: 9:57 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from pcwin002.win.tue.nl (pcwin002.win.tue.nl [131.155.71.72])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 73EB037B491; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 06:09:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from stijn@localhost)
	by pcwin002.win.tue.nl (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f11E8lN29873;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 15:08:47 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from stijn)
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 15:08:47 +0100
From: Stijn Hoop <stijn@win.tue.nl>
To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@freebsd.org>
Cc: Eraldo Jr <eraldo_j@yahoo.com>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: - i810 is only supported on Linux/x86 -
Message-ID: <20010201150847.C2290@pcwin002.win.tue.nl>
References: <20010201130711.27533.qmail@web4406.mail.yahoo.com> <20010201160303.A38766@sunbay.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20010201160303.A38766@sunbay.com>; from ru@freebsd.org on Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 04:03:03PM +0200
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 04:03:03PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 05:07:11AM -0800, Eraldo Jr wrote:
> > This is real ?
> > 
> > ***********************************************
> > http://www.xfree86.org/4.0.2/Status17.html#17
> > 
> No, this information is obsolete.
> 
> FreeBSD had support for running XFree86 4.0.X on i810
> starting with 4.1-RELEASE.
> 
> XFree86 supports FreeBSD on i810 natively starting with
> release 4.0.2.
> 
> This could be checked with both FreeBSD and XFree86 CVS
> logs.
> 
> I have no idea why they have not updated the information.

Maybe because 3D acceleration *isn't* supported yet? (the DRM i810 kernel
module only exists for Linux).

--Stijn


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  6:18:38 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from keyser.soze.com (keyser.soze.com [194.165.93.196])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E376537B698; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 06:18:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from erg.verweg.com ([132.229.90.89])
	by keyser.soze.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA18398;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 15:18:14 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from ruben@localhost)
	by erg.verweg.com (8.9.3+3.2W/8.9.3) id PAA01968;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 15:26:56 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 15:26:55 +0100
From: Ruben van Staveren <ruben@verweg.com>
To: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis <jonny@jonny.eng.br>
Cc: Yusuf Goolamabbas <yusufg@outblaze.com>,
	Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@aciri.org>, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG,
	freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Bridging and dummynet seems to destroy dmesg output
Message-ID: <20010201152654.A1816@erg.verweg.com>
References: <3A787124.B307EC20@jonny.eng.br> <200101312012.f0VKCGB07532@iguana.aciri.org> <20010201135551.A13446@outblaze.com> <3A795660.687791E6@jonny.eng.br>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i
In-Reply-To: <3A795660.687791E6@jonny.eng.br>; from jonny@jonny.eng.br on Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 10:28:16AM -0200
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> > > >
> > > >     I sent these files in private.  But I remembered that I have another
> > > > unusual config in this machine: is is multiprocessed, and has 10 SCSI disks
> > > > and lots of SYSV shared memory.
> > >
> > > i think SMP might have something to do with it. Yusuf, are you also
> > > using an SMP box ?
> > 
> > The strange thing is that if I turn on verbose logging (via sysctl) but
> > don't turn on verbose_limit, dmesg seems to get corrupted. If I have

> > 
> > So, it seems some combination of verbose logging and non setting of
> > verbose limit [or the default setting of verbose limit] is causing this
> > problem
> 

>     Just in case nobody has yet noticed, this is for sure a case of lost
> pointer.  And if the kernel is not yet crashing is just mere luck!  Time to
> audit changes since -release?

Eh no.

I've experienced panic's at the end of /etc/rc, just before going multiuser.
When I disable firewalling in /etc/rc.conf the system boots up fine.
(although it isn't that useful anymore, because of the default deny everything
policy of ipfw).

This was on a SMP box with a Jan 30 cvsup, I'm currently downgrading it to
an older 4.2-stable (dated 30 Dec 2000)

Regards,
	Ruben

-- 
   ,-_  .------------------------------------------------------------.
  /() ) |     Ruben van Staveren     | Linux is for Microsoft Haters,|_o
 (__ (  | http://ruben.is.verweg.com | BSD is for Unix Lovers        | #>
=/  ()  `----------------------------+-------------------------------' 4


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  6:25:13 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from udev.over.ru (runaway.2sun.ru [212.158.172.5])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B1FBC37B69D
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 06:24:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 714 invoked by uid 1000); 1 Feb 2001 14:24:24 -0000
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 17:24:24 +0300
From: Alex Povolotsky <tarkhil@over.ru>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Perl 5.6.0
Message-ID: <20010201172423.A702@runaway.2sun.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hello!

As far as I know, stable Perl is 5.6.0; however, it is neither in -STABLE
tree nor even in ports/lang.

Does any reason (except no one bothered to import it) exists? Or Perl 5.6.0
is not THAT stable?

Alex.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  6:31:30 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from juil.domain (unknown [194.226.17.51])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7D7137B6A1
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 06:31:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by juil.domain (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id CF4FAE7; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 17:31:16 +0300 (MSK)
To: Alex Povolotsky <tarkhil@over.ru>
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Perl 5.6.0
References: <20010201172423.A702@runaway.2sun.ru>
From: Ilya Martynov <m_ilya@agava.com>
Date: 01 Feb 2001 17:31:16 +0300
In-Reply-To: <20010201172423.A702@runaway.2sun.ru>
Message-ID: <861ytiscej.fsf@juil.domain>
Lines: 14
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>>>>> "AP" == Alex Povolotsky <tarkhil@over.ru> writes:

    AP> Hello!  As far as I know, stable Perl is 5.6.0; however, it is
    AP> neither in -STABLE tree nor even in ports/lang.

    AP> Does any reason (except no one bothered to import it) exists?
    AP> Or Perl 5.6.0 is not THAT stable?

It is not stable! At least there are exists several bugs that affect
mod_perl.

-- 
Ilya Martynov
AGAVA Software Company, http://www.agava.com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  6:49:51 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from serenity.mcc.ac.uk (serenity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.93])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE9F537B699
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 06:49:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97] ident=root)
	by serenity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #4)
	id 14OL3G-000DB2-00
	for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 14:49:34 +0000
Received: (from jcm@localhost)
	by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f11EnUR74823
	for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 14:49:30 GMT
	(envelope-from jcm)
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 14:49:30 +0000
From: j mckitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: parallel port zip plus driver
Message-ID: <20010201144930.A74754@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


Would anyone out there be interested in a patch that allows a parallel port
zip plus to run in PS2 mode, which is faster than NIBBLE mode?

jcm
-- 
o-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-o
| "You can't have everything.  Where would you put it?" - Steven Wright |
o-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-o



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  7:54:25 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from udev.over.ru (runaway.2sun.ru [212.158.172.5])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BA62A37B698
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 07:54:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 1590 invoked by uid 1000); 1 Feb 2001 15:53:36 -0000
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 18:53:36 +0300
From: Alex Povolotsky <tarkhil@over.ru>
To: Ilya Martynov <m_ilya@agava.com>
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Perl 5.6.0
Message-ID: <20010201185336.A989@runaway.2sun.ru>
References: <20010201172423.A702@runaway.2sun.ru> <861ytiscej.fsf@juil.domain>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <861ytiscej.fsf@juil.domain>; from m_ilya@agava.com on Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 05:31:16PM +0300
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 05:31:16PM +0300, Ilya Martynov wrote:
>     AP> Does any reason (except no one bothered to import it) exists?
>     AP> Or Perl 5.6.0 is not THAT stable?
> 
> It is not stable! At least there are exists several bugs that affect
> mod_perl.
I've looked into modperl mailing list archives, and didn't find anything
bad; anyway, modperl 1.25 seems to fix everything.

Does anyone have PERSONAL bad experiences with 5.6? And what is the status
of threads support in FreeBSD?

Alex.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  7:57:42 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from cage.simianscience.com (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 79B0537B67D; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 07:57:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from chimp (fcage [192.168.0.2])
	by cage.simianscience.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f11FvJ400369;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 10:57:20 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Message-Id: <4.2.2.20010201104340.013e00d8@marble.sentex.net>
X-Sender: mdtancsa@marble.sentex.net
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.2.2 
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 10:57:18 -0500
To: stable@freebsd.org
From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
Subject: ast0: TAPE <OnStream DI-30> 
Cc: sos@freebsd.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


I have been trying out the OnStream DI-30 in STABLE which come up as
ast0: TAPE <OnStream DI-30> at ata1-master using WDMA2

Dump seems to work with it OK in that I can dump a file system and restore 
it OK. But tar does not. I have tried plan old tar and tar with block size 
specifications, but no dice.

ruby2# tar -b 4096 -c -f /dev/nrast0 altq-3.0
tar: can't write to /dev/nrast0 : Input/output error

It just gives a series of
ast0: bad request, must be multiple of 32768
ast0: bad request, must be multiple of 32768
ast0: bad request, must be multiple of 32768
ast0: bad request, must be multiple of 32768
ast0: bad request, must be multiple of 32768
ast0: bad request, must be multiple of 32768

no matter what block size I try.

The other quirk I noticed is that after a dump,
ast0: WEOF - ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=24 ascq=00 error=04

Is this just a limitation of the hardware and driver ? It looks like they 
have LINUX support on their web page. Too bad they are not doing the same 
for FreeBSD.

	---Mike

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Mike Tancsa,                          	          tel +1 519 651 3400
Network Administration,     			  mike@sentex.net
Sentex Communications                 		  www.sentex.net
Cambridge, Ontario Canada			  www.sentex.net/mike



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  8:11:29 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from elec.elec.org (isdn-yunq-209-88-249-115.yunque.net [209.88.249.115])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05C6937B491
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 08:11:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from abel (abel [192.168.1.13])
	by elec.elec.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) with SMTP id f11C9Jx10691
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 08:09:19 -0400 (AST)
	(envelope-from elec@chatpr.org)
Message-ID: <008301c08c69$cf0c04e0$0d01a8c0@elec.org>
From: "Abel Alejandro" <elec@chatpr.org>
To: <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject: make buildworld
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:12:43 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0080_01C08C48.47D13200"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0080_01C08C48.47D13200
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

loco# uname -a
FreeBSD loco.sixthlight.com 4.2-STABLE FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE #0: Sat Jan  2 =
02:28:26 AST 1999     =
root@loco.sixthlight.com:/usr/src/sys/compile/GENERIC  i386
loco#=20

On a fresh cvsup'd copy of /usr/src. I try using make buildworld or =
going to /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl and make a manual make of it but =
it always cames with the same error:

*** Error code 1 (ignored)
Makefile out-of-date with respect to Makefile.PL =
/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl/lib/Config.pm =
/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl/config.h
Cleaning current config before rebuilding Makefile...
make -f Makefile.old clean > /dev/null 2>&1 || /bin/sh -c true
/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl/../miniperl/miniperl =
"-I/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl/lib" =
"-I/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl/lib" Makefile.PL =
"INSTALLDIRS=3Dperl" "PERL_SRC=3D/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl" =
"INSTALLMAN3DIR=3D/usr/share/perl/man3" =
"PERL=3D/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl/../miniperl/miniperl" =
"FULLPERL=3Dperl" "DEFINE=3D-I/usr/include" "DEFINE=3D-DPERL_CORE" =
"LINKTYPE=3Dstatic" "LIBS=3D-lperl -lm"
Writing Makefile for DynaLoader
=3D=3D> Your Makefile has been rebuilt. <=3D=3D
=3D=3D> Please rerun the make command.  <=3D=3D
false
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl/ext/DynaLoader.
*** Error code 1

Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl.

------=_NextPart_000_0080_01C08C48.47D13200
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4611.1300" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>loco# uname -a<BR>FreeBSD =
loco.sixthlight.com=20
4.2-STABLE FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE #0: Sat Jan&nbsp; 2 02:28:26 AST=20
1999&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; <A=20
href=3D"mailto:root@loco.sixthlight.com:/usr/src/sys/compile/GENERIC">roo=
t@loco.sixthlight.com:/usr/src/sys/compile/GENERIC</A>&nbsp;=20
i386<BR>loco# </FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>On a fresh cvsup'd copy of /usr/src. I =
try using=20
make buildworld or going to /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl and make a =
manual=20
make of it but it always cames with the same error:</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>*** Error code 1 (ignored)<BR>Makefile =
out-of-date=20
with respect to Makefile.PL =
/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl/lib/Config.pm=20
/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl/config.h<BR>Cleaning current =
config=20
before rebuilding Makefile...<BR>make -f Makefile.old clean &gt; =
/dev/null=20
2&gt;&amp;1 || /bin/sh -c=20
true<BR>/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl/../miniperl/miniperl=20
"-I/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl/lib"=20
"-I/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl/lib" Makefile.PL =
"INSTALLDIRS=3Dperl"=20
"PERL_SRC=3D/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl"=20
"INSTALLMAN3DIR=3D/usr/share/perl/man3"=20
"PERL=3D/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl/../miniperl/miniperl"=20
"FULLPERL=3Dperl" "DEFINE=3D-I/usr/include" "DEFINE=3D-DPERL_CORE" =
"LINKTYPE=3Dstatic"=20
"LIBS=3D-lperl -lm"<BR>Writing Makefile for DynaLoader<BR>=3D=3D&gt; =
Your Makefile has=20
been rebuilt. &lt;=3D=3D<BR>=3D=3D&gt; Please rerun the make =
command.&nbsp;=20
&lt;=3D=3D<BR>false<BR>*** Error code 1</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Stop in=20
/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl/ext/DynaLoader.<BR>*** Error code =

1</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DArial size=3D2>Stop in =
/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/perl.</FONT><FONT=20
face=3DArial size=3D2></DIV></FONT></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0080_01C08C48.47D13200--



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  8:13:20 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from peitho.fxp.org (peitho.fxp.org [209.26.95.40])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1374F37B491
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 08:13:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by peitho.fxp.org (Postfix, from userid 1501)
	id 228D213614; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 11:13:02 -0500 (EST)
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 11:13:01 -0500
From: Chris Faulhaber <jedgar@fxp.org>
To: Abel Alejandro <elec@chatpr.org>
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: make buildworld
Message-ID: <20010201111301.A14399@peitho.fxp.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Chris Faulhaber <jedgar@fxp.org>,
	Abel Alejandro <elec@chatpr.org>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
References: <008301c08c69$cf0c04e0$0d01a8c0@elec.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <008301c08c69$cf0c04e0$0d01a8c0@elec.org>; from elec@chatpr.org on Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 12:12:43PM -0400
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 12:12:43PM -0400, Abel Alejandro wrote:
> loco# uname -a
> FreeBSD loco.sixthlight.com 4.2-STABLE FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE #0: Sat Jan  2 02:28:26 AST 1999     root@loco.sixthlight.com:/usr/src/sys/compile/GENERIC  i386
> loco# 
> 
*snip*
> ==> Your Makefile has been rebuilt. <==
> ==> Please rerun the make command.  <==
> false
> *** Error code 1
> 

Check the system's clock

-- 
Chris D. Faulhaber - jedgar@fxp.org - jedgar@FreeBSD.org
--------------------------------------------------------
FreeBSD: The Power To Serve   -   http://www.FreeBSD.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  8:21:24 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from juil.domain (unknown [194.226.17.51])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EED6C37B67D
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 08:21:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: by juil.domain (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 8C69DE7; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 19:21:09 +0300 (MSK)
To: Alex Povolotsky <tarkhil@over.ru>
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Perl 5.6.0
References: <20010201172423.A702@runaway.2sun.ru> <861ytiscej.fsf@juil.domain>
	<20010201185336.A989@runaway.2sun.ru>
From: Ilya Martynov <m_ilya@agava.com>
Date: 01 Feb 2001 19:21:08 +0300
In-Reply-To: <20010201185336.A989@runaway.2sun.ru>
Message-ID: <86ae86qsqz.fsf@juil.domain>
Lines: 30
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>>>>> "AP" == Alex Povolotsky <tarkhil@over.ru> writes:

    AP> On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 05:31:16PM +0300, Ilya Martynov wrote:
    AP> Does any reason (except no one bothered to import it) exists?
    AP> Or Perl 5.6.0 is not THAT stable?
    >>  It is not stable! At least there are exists several bugs that
    >> affect mod_perl.
    AP> I've looked into modperl mailing list archives, and didn't
    AP> find anything bad; anyway, modperl 1.25 seems to fix
    AP> everything.

Search mod_perl mailing list archives for string 'Bizarre copy of
ARRAY' for example. You will find several messages about problems in
running mod_perl with Perl 5.6.0.

For example:

http://www.mail-archive.com/modperl%40apache.org/msg07841.html

http://www.mail-archive.com/modperl%40apache.org/msg14797.html

You will find some info about one Perl 5.6.0 bug - 'killer' of
mod_perl.

P.S. I've not found anything in ChangeLogs of modperl 1.25 about
workaround for this Perl 5.6.0 bug. So I assume it is still here.

-- 
Ilya Martynov
AGAVA Software Company, http://www.agava.com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  8:40:44 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from yertle.kciLink.com (yertle.kciLink.com [208.184.13.195])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B289437B491
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 08:40:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from onceler.kciLink.com (onceler.kciLink.com [208.184.13.196])
	by yertle.kciLink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A79752E440
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 11:40:22 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from khera@localhost)
	by onceler.kciLink.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f11GeMv26910;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 11:40:22 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from khera)
From: Vivek Khera <khera@kciLink.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <14969.37238.537536.86899@onceler.kciLink.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 11:40:22 -0500
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Perl 5.6.0
In-Reply-To: <20010201172423.A702@runaway.2sun.ru>
References: <20010201172423.A702@runaway.2sun.ru>
X-Mailer: VM 6.90 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>>>>> "AP" == Alex Povolotsky <tarkhil@over.ru> writes:

AP> Does any reason (except no one bothered to import it) exists? Or Perl 5.6.0
AP> is not THAT stable?

Exactly.  It is no THAT stable.  Wait for 5.6.1 which is currently in
testing.  I don't think this major change should happen in FreeBSD
4-STABLE, though.

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Vivek Khera, Ph.D.                Khera Communications, Inc.
Internet: khera@kciLink.com       Rockville, MD       +1-240-453-8497
AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera   http://www.khera.org/~vivek/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  8:42:42 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from serenity.mcc.ac.uk (serenity.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.200.93])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF94537B4EC
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 08:42:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97] ident=root)
	by serenity.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #4)
	id 14OMoG-000JG2-00; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 16:42:12 +0000
Received: (from jcm@localhost)
	by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f11GgBE76036;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 16:42:11 GMT
	(envelope-from jcm)
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 16:42:11 +0000
From: j mckitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org>
To: John Merryweather Cooper <jmcoopr@webmail.bmi.net>
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: parallel port zip plus driver
Message-ID: <20010201164211.A76012@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
References: <20010201144930.A74754@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <3A798947.EE4042AC@webmail.bmi.net> <20010201161117.C74754@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <3A798D27.16411C2@webmail.bmi.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="UugvWAfsgieZRqgk"
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0.1i
In-Reply-To: <3A798D27.16411C2@webmail.bmi.net>; from jmcoopr@webmail.bmi.net on Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 08:21:59AM -0800
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


--UugvWAfsgieZRqgk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii


Try this....

Be sure to set the flags for ppc to allow PS2 mode.

jcm
-- 
o-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-o
| "You can't have everything.  Where would you put it?" - Steven Wright |
o-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-o


--UugvWAfsgieZRqgk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="immio.patch"

--- /usr/src/sys/dev/ppbus/immio.c	Mon Jun 12 11:34:07 2000
+++ immioj.c	Thu Feb  1 16:38:00 2001
@@ -797,6 +797,8 @@
 		if (imm_instr(vpo, &h, 1)) {
 			*ret = VP0_EOTHER+2; goto error;
 		}
+	if (h == -1)
+		h = 0;
 
 	*result = ((int) h << 8) | ((int) l & 0xff);
 

--UugvWAfsgieZRqgk--


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  8:47:25 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from yertle.kciLink.com (yertle.kciLink.com [208.184.13.195])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48D2F37B491
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 08:47:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from onceler.kciLink.com (onceler.kciLink.com [208.184.13.196])
	by yertle.kciLink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC6F72E443
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 11:47:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from khera@localhost)
	by onceler.kciLink.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f11Gl0h37662;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 11:47:00 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from khera)
From: Vivek Khera <khera@kciLink.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <14969.37636.732225.579750@onceler.kciLink.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 11:47:00 -0500
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Perl 5.6.0
In-Reply-To: <20010201185336.A989@runaway.2sun.ru>
References: <20010201172423.A702@runaway.2sun.ru>
	<861ytiscej.fsf@juil.domain>
	<20010201185336.A989@runaway.2sun.ru>
X-Mailer: VM 6.90 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>>>>> "AP" == Alex Povolotsky <tarkhil@over.ru> writes:

>> It is not stable! At least there are exists several bugs that affect
>> mod_perl.
AP> I've looked into modperl mailing list archives, and didn't find anything
AP> bad; anyway, modperl 1.25 seems to fix everything.

You should look harder in the list; it has been discussed a few times,
and patches for Perl posted.




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  9: 3:32 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from yertle.kciLink.com (yertle.kciLink.com [208.184.13.195])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1203737B67D
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 09:03:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from onceler.kciLink.com (onceler.kciLink.com [208.184.13.196])
	by yertle.kciLink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D72F2E440
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 12:03:11 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from khera@localhost)
	by onceler.kciLink.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f11H3Bk55571;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:03:11 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from khera)
From: Vivek Khera <khera@kciLink.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <14969.38607.142726.115583@onceler.kciLink.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:03:11 -0500
To: FreeBSD Stable <stable@freebsd.org>
Subject: DNS security
X-Mailer: VM 6.90 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Given the recent insecurities in DNS, we decided to implement the
authentication features of bind.  With doing this, and also running
bind in a chroot environment (as user bind, group bind) we run into a
couple of snags.

1) the named.conf file needs to be non-world readable.  Simple fix is
   to make it group bind instead of wheel so that named can read it on
   a reload.  This seems like a good thing to do in any case.

2) bind tries to write temporary files into the CWD.  Unfortunately,
   /etc/namedb is root:wheel and not writable by the bind process
   owner.  There doesn't seem to be a parameter to bind to tell it
   where to write those files, but there is an environment variable,
   DSTKEYPATH, that can be used.

The problem I have is how to make FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE pass that
environment variable to bind during boot.  There doesn't seem to be a
good way to do that with the stock startup scripts.  For now, I'm just
going to start bind in /etc/rc.local and turn it off from rc.conf.

Does it seem like a good idea to be able to set the BIND environment
variables from the stock rc scripts?  If so, could someone add this?

Thanks.

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Vivek Khera, Ph.D.                Khera Communications, Inc.
Internet: khera@kciLink.com       Rockville, MD       +1-240-453-8497
AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera   http://www.khera.org/~vivek/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  9:12:17 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from ashburn.skiltech.com (ashburn.skiltech.com [216.235.79.239])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F3D37B6A2
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 09:11:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from minter@localhost)
	by ashburn.skiltech.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f11HBsG28785;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:11:54 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from minter)
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:11:54 -0500 (EST)
From: "H. Wade Minter" <minter@lunenburg.org>
X-X-Sender:  <minter@ashburn.skiltech.com>
To: <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: chrooting bind
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.32.0102011209430.27692-100000@ashburn.skiltech.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

I'm trying to chroot bind-8.2.3-REL on a spare slave server as a test.
I'm doing this by copying the normal dynamically-linked binaries and
libraries into the chroot jail.

Everything seems to be working alright, except that named-xfer isn't
happy.  In the syslog, I get a line like this:

Feb  1 11:05:29 carlton named[5028]: named-xfer "SAMPLE_DOMAIN" exited
with signal 6

for every domain I have.  Does anyone have any suggestions?

--Wade



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  9:17: 9 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from whistle.com (s205m131.whistle.com [207.76.205.131])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6049337B6A7
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 09:16:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from smap@localhost)
	by whistle.com (8.10.0/8.10.0) id f11HGkt15082;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 09:16:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pau-amma.whistle.com( 207.76.205.64) by whistle.com via smap (V2.0)
	id xma015078; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 09:16:20 -0800
Received: (from dhw@localhost)
	by pau-amma.whistle.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f11HGK503410;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 09:16:20 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 09:16:20 -0800 (PST)
From: David Wolfskill <dhw@whistle.com>
Message-Id: <200102011716.f11HGK503410@pau-amma.whistle.com>
To: khera@kciLink.com, stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: DNS security
In-Reply-To: <14969.38607.142726.115583@onceler.kciLink.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>From: Vivek Khera <khera@kciLink.com>
>Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:03:11 -0500

>2) bind tries to write temporary files into the CWD.  Unfortunately,
>   /etc/namedb is root:wheel and not writable by the bind process
>   owner.  There doesn't seem to be a parameter to bind to tell it
>   where to write those files, but there is an environment variable,
>   DSTKEYPATH, that can be used.

named has a command-line argument to override the location of its
configuration file -- or you can make /etc/named.conf a symlink to the
real one.

In turn, named.conf has a directive:

options {
        directory "/etc/namedb";
	...
	};

and you may change that to suit your environemnt.  For example, my home
firewall (& external nameserver) has:

options {
        directory "/var/namedb";
	...
	};

(and /etc/named.conf is a symlink to /var/namedb/named.conf).

Cheers,
david
-- 
David Wolfskill      dhw@whistle.com   UNIX System Administrator
Desk: 650/577-7158   TIE: 8/499-7158   Cell: 650/759-0823


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  9:22:14 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from harp.wrdp.com (harp.dublin.wrdp.net [212.147.130.131])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC9C37B6A6
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 09:21:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from JRAFTERY (jraftery.dublin.wrdp.net [172.16.4.52])
	by harp.wrdp.com (Postfix) with SMTP
	id B833410AD0; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 17:21:47 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <010601c08c73$c0a4fe20$340410ac@JRAFTERY>
From: "James Raftery" <jraftery@wrdp.com>
To: "Vivek Khera" <khera@kciLink.com>,
	"FreeBSD Stable" <stable@freebsd.org>
References: <14969.38607.142726.115583@onceler.kciLink.com>
Subject: Re: DNS security
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 17:23:54 -0000
Organization: Worldport Communications Inc
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> 2) bind tries to write temporary files into the CWD.  Unfortunately,
>    /etc/namedb is root:wheel and not writable by the bind process
>    owner.  There doesn't seem to be a parameter to bind to tell it
>    where to write those files, but there is an environment variable,
>    DSTKEYPATH, that can be used.

Use the 'directory' statement in the options clause of named.conf:

options {
    [...]
    directory "/var/tmp";
};

Change /var/tmp to some directory in your chroot tree that the bind user
can write to.


Regards,

james





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  9:23: 4 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from yertle.kciLink.com (yertle.kciLink.com [208.184.13.195])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CF5437B6AA
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 09:22:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from onceler.kciLink.com (onceler.kciLink.com [208.184.13.196])
	by yertle.kciLink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3EEF2E440
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 12:22:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from khera@localhost)
	by onceler.kciLink.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f11HMiO76947;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:22:44 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from khera)
From: Vivek Khera <khera@kciLink.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <14969.39780.805831.185241@onceler.kciLink.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:22:44 -0500
To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: chrooting bind
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.32.0102011209430.27692-100000@ashburn.skiltech.com>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.32.0102011209430.27692-100000@ashburn.skiltech.com>
X-Mailer: VM 6.90 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Pretty much the only thing you have to do to run bind in chroot is to
set the named_flags="-g bind -u bind" flags in /etc/rc.conf.  That's
my understanding of it based on the FreeBSD docs.




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  9:25:22 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 712EC37B4EC
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 09:25:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from des@localhost)
	by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA31471;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 18:24:47 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from des@ofug.org)
X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/
X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily
  coincide with those of any organisation or company with
  which I am or have been affiliated.
To: "H. Wade Minter" <minter@lunenburg.org>
Cc: <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: chrooting bind
References: <Pine.BSF.4.32.0102011209430.27692-100000@ashburn.skiltech.com>
From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
Date: 01 Feb 2001 18:24:46 +0100
In-Reply-To: "H. Wade Minter"'s message of "Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:11:54 -0500 (EST)"
Message-ID: <xzpitmuwc2p.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
Lines: 13
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

"H. Wade Minter" <minter@lunenburg.org> writes:
> I'm trying to chroot bind-8.2.3-REL on a spare slave server as a test.
> I'm doing this by copying the normal dynamically-linked binaries and
> libraries into the chroot jail.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=293748+0+current/freebsd-security

Look for "Instructions for running BIND in a chroot sandbox" about
halfway down.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  9:26: 4 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com (sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com [192.215.234.86])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 380CC37B6A9
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 09:25:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 23786 invoked by uid 1078); 1 Feb 2001 17:25:47 -0000
Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1)
  by localhost with SMTP; 1 Feb 2001 17:25:47 -0000
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 09:25:47 -0800 (PST)
From: Gordon Tetlow <gordont@bluemtn.net>
X-X-Sender:  <gordont@sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com>
To: Vivek Khera <khera@kciLink.com>
Cc: <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: chrooting bind
In-Reply-To: <14969.39780.805831.185241@onceler.kciLink.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0102010924030.17707-100000@sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Vivek Khera wrote:

> Pretty much the only thing you have to do to run bind in chroot is to
> set the named_flags="-g bind -u bind" flags in /etc/rc.conf.  That's
> my understanding of it based on the FreeBSD docs.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but this is only a sandbox (run as a different
user) while this person wants to set up a true chroot environment.
Personally, I think that the former is adequete as nothing else on the box
is owned by the bind user.

-gordon



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  9:30:42 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from yertle.kciLink.com (yertle.kciLink.com [208.184.13.195])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C397637B4EC
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 09:30:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from onceler.kciLink.com (onceler.kciLink.com [208.184.13.196])
	by yertle.kciLink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E30BF2E443
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 12:30:21 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from khera@localhost)
	by onceler.kciLink.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f11HULj79843;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:30:21 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from khera)
From: Vivek Khera <khera@kciLink.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <14969.40237.815895.937483@onceler.kciLink.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:30:21 -0500
To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: DNS security
In-Reply-To: <200102011716.f11HGK503410@pau-amma.whistle.com>
References: <14969.38607.142726.115583@onceler.kciLink.com>
	<200102011716.f11HGK503410@pau-amma.whistle.com>
X-Mailer: VM 6.90 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>>>>> "DW" == David Wolfskill <dhw@whistle.com> writes:

>> From: Vivek Khera <khera@kciLink.com>

>> 2) bind tries to write temporary files into the CWD.  Unfortunately,
>> /etc/namedb is root:wheel and not writable by the bind process

DW> In turn, named.conf has a directive:

DW> options {
DW>         directory "/etc/namedb";
DW> 	...
DW> 	};

Right... but then I have to make whatever is set to "directory"
writable by bind, and that means that bind has free reign over
everything there.  I'd like to be able to tell bind to put its files
in some other directory that it is allowed to write to leaving my zone
files and such better protected from possible future bugs.

It is trivial of course to make /etc/namedb writable by bind except
make world will reset it...


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  9:31:55 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from awww.jeah.net (awww.jeah.net [216.111.239.130])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DC4137B491
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 09:31:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (chris@localhost)
	by awww.jeah.net (8.11.1/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f11HUOo66662;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 11:30:24 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from chris@JEAH.net)
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 11:30:24 -0600 (CST)
From: Chris Byrnes <chris@JEAH.net>
To: Vivek Khera <khera@kciLink.com>
Cc: FreeBSD Stable <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: DNS security
In-Reply-To: <14969.38607.142726.115583@onceler.kciLink.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0102011129290.62920-100000@awww.jeah.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> 2) bind tries to write temporary files into the CWD.  Unfortunately,
>    /etc/namedb is root:wheel and not writable by the bind process
>    owner.  There doesn't seem to be a parameter to bind to tell it
>    where to write those files, but there is an environment variable,
>    DSTKEYPATH, that can be used.

cd /etc
chown -R bind:bind namedb
chmod 700 namedb


-- Chris



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  9:33:26 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from digital.csudsu.com (digital.csudsu.com [209.249.57.102])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86E2B37B65D
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 09:33:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by digital.csudsu.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id E8A2522E01; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 09:35:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by digital.csudsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id CB52C1F001; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 09:35:14 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 09:35:14 -0800 (PST)
From: Stefan Molnar <stefan@csudsu.com>
To: Gordon Tetlow <gordont@bluemtn.net>
Cc: Vivek Khera <khera@kciLink.com>, <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: chrooting bind
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0102010924030.17707-100000@sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0102010934430.4036-100000@digital.csudsu.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


you can pass -t on the command line, then you have to put /dev
entries like a chrooted ftp.

On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Gordon Tetlow wrote:

> On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Vivek Khera wrote:
>
> > Pretty much the only thing you have to do to run bind in chroot is to
> > set the named_flags="-g bind -u bind" flags in /etc/rc.conf.  That's
> > my understanding of it based on the FreeBSD docs.
>
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but this is only a sandbox (run as a different
> user) while this person wants to set up a true chroot environment.
> Personally, I think that the former is adequete as nothing else on the box
> is owned by the bind user.
>
> -gordon
>
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
>
>



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  9:33:38 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from freebsd.dk (freebsd.dk [212.242.42.178])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id CC5EB37B4EC; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 09:33:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from sos@localhost)
	by freebsd.dk (8.9.3/8.9.1) id SAA66640;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 18:33:11 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from sos)
From: Soren Schmidt <sos@freebsd.dk>
Message-Id: <200102011733.SAA66640@freebsd.dk>
Subject: Re: ast0: TAPE <OnStream DI-30>
In-Reply-To: <4.2.2.20010201104340.013e00d8@marble.sentex.net> from Mike Tancsa at "Feb 1, 2001 10:57:18 am"
To: mike@sentex.net (Mike Tancsa)
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 18:33:11 +0100 (CET)
Cc: stable@freebsd.org, sos@freebsd.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

It seems Mike Tancsa wrote:
> 
> I have been trying out the OnStream DI-30 in STABLE which come up as
> ast0: TAPE <OnStream DI-30> at ata1-master using WDMA2
> 
> Dump seems to work with it OK in that I can dump a file system and restore 
> it OK. But tar does not. I have tried plan old tar and tar with block size 
> specifications, but no dice.
> 
> ruby2# tar -b 4096 -c -f /dev/nrast0 altq-3.0
> tar: can't write to /dev/nrast0 : Input/output error
> 
> It just gives a series of
> ast0: bad request, must be multiple of 32768
> ast0: bad request, must be multiple of 32768
> ast0: bad request, must be multiple of 32768
> ast0: bad request, must be multiple of 32768
> ast0: bad request, must be multiple of 32768
> ast0: bad request, must be multiple of 32768
> 
> no matter what block size I try.

You havn't what it says to you ie 32k blocksize ie:

tar cvbf 64 /dev/rast0 bla bla....

> The other quirk I noticed is that after a dump,
> ast0: WEOF - ILLEGAL REQUEST asc=24 ascq=00 error=04

Well, the Onstream has no notion of filemarks, at least not the
way we support it.

> Is this just a limitation of the hardware and driver ? It looks like they 
> have LINUX support on their web page. Too bad they are not doing the same 
> for FreeBSD.

I have a drive here that onstream sent me back when with docs, but to be 
brutally honest the drive and especially the firmaware sucks..
The drive has no idea how to handle bad spots on the media, the driver
has to read back up to 1 Mbyte worth of buffer when the drive hits
a write error, then wind forward some inches, and retry the
write again with the queued up and from the OS's Point of view
already written data, then if that still fails... you get the point...

Another thing is that for this to work, the drive has to be set into
a 32.5Kb block mode where the 32K carry userdata, and the 512bytes
carry block info, like blocknumber etc, since you have to have
that info when reading, since you must keep track of which blocks
you have read, since they might be repeated later due to bad spots
and the above hit'n'write strategy left one double block around...

So, since I have not found a way to deal with this in a satisfactory
way (malloc'ing 1 Mbyte worth of buffer in the kernel is not fun), the
support we have can't handle tapes with bad spots on it...

I wouldn't trust my data to such a poorly implemented device...

However the drive sits in one of my dev machines, and I hack on 
the driver from time to time, so it will probably be supported
at some point in the future...

-Sųren


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  9:33:55 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from cypherpunks.ai (cypherpunks.ai [209.88.68.47])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6657C37B69C
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 09:33:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vangelderen.org (grolsch.ai [209.88.68.214])
	by cypherpunks.ai (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C6E44C
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 13:33:24 -0400 (AST)
Message-ID: <3A799DE4.8CDA19B9@vangelderen.org>
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 13:33:24 -0400
From: "Jeroen C. van Gelderen" <jeroen@vangelderen.org>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.73 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.12 i386)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Fix for find(1) warning in /etc/rc
Content-Type: multipart/mixed;
 boundary="------------29A142C8BA9E2F8415D246AB"
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------29A142C8BA9E2F8415D246AB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Hi,

I hope this is the correct mailing list to ask. Redirects
appreciated...

It seems that our current rc script unconditionally tries
to find(1) /var/tmp/vi.recover on bootup. If no such 
directory exists, one gets a nice warning in the bootup 
sequence. 

I've produced a little patch to check for the existence of 
vi.recover before doing the find. It can be found in PR
24515: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=24515 .

Would someone be willing to commit this?

Cheers,
Jeroen
-- 
Jeroen C. van Gelderen          o      _     _         _
jeroen@vangelderen.org  _o     /\_   _ \\o  (_)\__/o  (_)
                      _< \_   _>(_) (_)/<_    \_| \   _|/' \/
                     (_)>(_) (_)        (_)   (_)    (_)'  _\o_
--------------29A142C8BA9E2F8415D246AB
Content-Type: message/rfc822
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline

Received: from cypherpunks.ai ([209.88.68.47])
	by wit387304.student.utwente.nl with esmtp (Exim 2.05 #1)
	id 14KTwW-0001EE-00
	for gelderen@wit387304.student.utwente.nl; Mon, 22 Jan 2001 00:30:40 +0100
Received: from pyyl.pair.com (pyyl.pair.com [209.68.1.203])
	by cypherpunks.ai (Postfix) with SMTP id BB2B14C
	for <jeroen@vangelderen.org>; Sun, 21 Jan 2001 19:30:05 -0400 (AST)
Received: (qmail 89034 invoked by uid 3194); 21 Jan 2001 23:30:05 -0000
Delivered-To: iang-systemics:com-jeroen@systemics.com
X-Envelope-To: jeroen@systemics.com
Received: (qmail 89027 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2001 23:30:05 -0000
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (216.136.204.125)
  by pyyl.pair.com with SMTP; 21 Jan 2001 23:30:05 -0000
Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.18])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ED6E6E2B48
	for <jeroen@systemics.com>; Sun, 21 Jan 2001 15:30:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF6E37B400
	for <jeroen@systemics.com>; Sun, 21 Jan 2001 15:30:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f0LNU1722852;
	Sun, 21 Jan 2001 15:30:01 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from gnats)
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 15:30:01 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200101212330.f0LNU1722852@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: jeroen@systemics.com
From: gnats-admin@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: conf/24515: Fix for find(1) warning in /etc/rc
Reply-To: gnats-admin@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
In-Reply-To: Your message of Sun, 21 Jan 2001 19:28:25 -0400 (AST)
	<200101212328.f0LNSP400470@grolsch.ai>
Sender: gnats@FreeBSD.org

Thank you very much for your problem report.
It has the internal identification `conf/24515'.
The individual assigned to look at your
report is: freebsd-bugs. 

You can access the state of your problem report at any time
via this link:

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=24515

>Category:       conf
>Responsible:    freebsd-bugs
>Synopsis:       Fix for find(1) warning in /etc/rc
>Arrival-Date:   Sun Jan 21 15:30:01 PST 2001



--------------29A142C8BA9E2F8415D246AB--



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  9:36:26 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC2D737B65D
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 09:36:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from des@localhost)
	by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA31558;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 18:35:51 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from des@ofug.org)
X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/
X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily
  coincide with those of any organisation or company with
  which I am or have been affiliated.
To: Gordon Tetlow <gordont@bluemtn.net>
Cc: Vivek Khera <khera@kciLink.com>, <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: chrooting bind
References: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0102010924030.17707-100000@sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com>
From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
Date: 01 Feb 2001 18:35:51 +0100
In-Reply-To: Gordon Tetlow's message of "Thu, 1 Feb 2001 09:25:47 -0800 (PST)"
Message-ID: <xzpae86wbk8.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
Lines: 15
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Gordon Tetlow <gordont@bluemtn.net> writes:
> Correct me if I'm wrong, but this is only a sandbox (run as a different
> user) while this person wants to set up a true chroot environment.
> Personally, I think that the former is adequete as nothing else on the box
> is owned by the bind user.

Are you absolutely certain your box doesn't have a local root
vulnerability? For instance, are you running a recent -STABLE (which
is believed to be secure), or are you running e.g. 4.1.1-RELEASE
(which has an exploitable buffer overflow in the procfs code)? Run
BIND in a jail, or a chroot if you can't set up a jail.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  9:38:15 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98E7237B65D
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 09:37:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from des@localhost)
	by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA31575;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 18:37:47 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from des@ofug.org)
X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/
X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily
  coincide with those of any organisation or company with
  which I am or have been affiliated.
To: Stefan Molnar <stefan@csudsu.com>
Cc: Gordon Tetlow <gordont@bluemtn.net>,
	Vivek Khera <khera@kciLink.com>, <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: chrooting bind
References: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0102010934430.4036-100000@digital.csudsu.com>
From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
Date: 01 Feb 2001 18:37:47 +0100
In-Reply-To: Stefan Molnar's message of "Thu, 1 Feb 2001 09:35:14 -0800 (PST)"
Message-ID: <xzp4ryewbh0.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
Lines: 9
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Stefan Molnar <stefan@csudsu.com> writes:
> you can pass -t on the command line, then you have to put /dev
> entries like a chrooted ftp.

No.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  9:39: 5 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.netunlimited.net (mail.netunlimited.net [208.128.132.4])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7246A37B69C
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 09:38:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from seahawk (seahawk.twinds.com [208.165.2.162])
	by mail.netunlimited.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA12565;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:35:26 -0500
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:38:34 -0500 (EST)
From: Arley Carter <arc@twinds.com>
To: Shigeki Mimura <mimu@msdj.com>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: - i810 is only supported on Linux/x86 -
In-Reply-To: <20010201221738Y.mimu@msdj.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0102011236020.29725-100000@seahawk.twinds.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

This is NOT true.  I have several boxes running 4.2 stable on i810
boards. Support for the 810 board was added either in 4.1 or 4.1.1

Cheers:
-arc

Arley Carter				arc@twinds.com
Tradewinds Technologies, Inc.		www.twinds.com
Winston-Salem, NC  USA			Network Engineering & Security	
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Shigeki Mimura wrote:

> Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 22:17:38 +0900
> From: Shigeki Mimura <mimu@msdj.com>
> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
> Subject: Re: - i810 is only supported on Linux/x86 -
> 
> 
> > This is real ?
> 
> Yes.
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
> 



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  9:40:26 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from yertle.kciLink.com (yertle.kciLink.com [208.184.13.195])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5165237B65D
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 09:40:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from onceler.kciLink.com (onceler.kciLink.com [208.184.13.196])
	by yertle.kciLink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B201F2E440
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 12:40:07 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from khera@localhost)
	by onceler.kciLink.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f11He7Q84383;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:40:07 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from khera)
From: Vivek Khera <khera@kciLink.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <14969.40823.370037.847034@onceler.kciLink.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:40:07 -0500
To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: chrooting bind
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0102010924030.17707-100000@sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com>
References: <14969.39780.805831.185241@onceler.kciLink.com>
	<Pine.BSF.4.31.0102010924030.17707-100000@sdmail0.sd.bmarts.com>
X-Mailer: VM 6.90 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>>>>> "GT" == Gordon Tetlow <gordont@bluemtn.net> writes:

GT> On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Vivek Khera wrote:
>> Pretty much the only thing you have to do to run bind in chroot is to
>> set the named_flags="-g bind -u bind" flags in /etc/rc.conf.  That's
>> my understanding of it based on the FreeBSD docs.

GT> Correct me if I'm wrong, but this is only a sandbox (run as a different
GT> user) while this person wants to set up a true chroot environment.

Hmmm.  I got the impression that it was chrooted from somewhere... I
guess I was wrong.  I'll track that down and send a bug report to the
docs team.  But in my mind sandbox == chroot.

GT> Personally, I think that the former is adequete as nothing else on the box
GT> is owned by the bind user.

Good 'nuff for government work ;-)


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  9:41:47 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from yertle.kciLink.com (yertle.kciLink.com [208.184.13.195])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E78D437B65D
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 09:41:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from onceler.kciLink.com (onceler.kciLink.com [208.184.13.196])
	by yertle.kciLink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1476D2E440; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 12:41:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from khera@localhost)
	by onceler.kciLink.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f11HfQ585047;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:41:26 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from khera)
From: Vivek Khera <khera@kciLink.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <14969.40901.952200.946573@onceler.kciLink.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:41:25 -0500
To: "James Raftery" <jraftery@wrdp.com>
Cc: "FreeBSD Stable" <stable@freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: DNS security
In-Reply-To: <010601c08c73$c0a4fe20$340410ac@JRAFTERY>
References: <14969.38607.142726.115583@onceler.kciLink.com>
	<010601c08c73$c0a4fe20$340410ac@JRAFTERY>
X-Mailer: VM 6.90 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>>>>> "JR" == James Raftery <jraftery@wrdp.com> writes:

JR> Use the 'directory' statement in the options clause of named.conf:

JR> options {
JR>     [...]
JR>     directory "/var/tmp";
JR> };

But that throws off the zone file directory paths... Hmm. I guess if I
were clever enough with subdirectory tree construction I could do
this...





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  9:43:28 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from yertle.kciLink.com (yertle.kciLink.com [208.184.13.195])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B49137B491
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 09:43:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from onceler.kciLink.com (onceler.kciLink.com [208.184.13.196])
	by yertle.kciLink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69CCA2E440
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 12:43:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from khera@localhost)
	by onceler.kciLink.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f11HhAV86193;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:43:10 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from khera)
From: Vivek Khera <khera@kciLink.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <14969.41006.240661.842348@onceler.kciLink.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:43:10 -0500
To: FreeBSD Stable <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: DNS security
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0102011129290.62920-100000@awww.jeah.net>
References: <14969.38607.142726.115583@onceler.kciLink.com>
	<Pine.BSF.4.21.0102011129290.62920-100000@awww.jeah.net>
X-Mailer: VM 6.90 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>>>>> "CB" == Chris Byrnes <chris@JEAH.net> writes:

>> 2) bind tries to write temporary files into the CWD.  Unfortunately,

CB> cd /etc
CB> chown -R bind:bind namedb
CB> chmod 700 namedb

Right... but next make installworld clobbers it back to root:wheel.
Otherwise it is a fine solution other than it may give bind
permissions to clobber files I don't want it to (due to unknown bugs).

Perhaps the mtree file could be changed to make /etc/namedb bind:bind
ownership?





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  9:48:32 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from guardian.hermes.si (guardian.hermes.si [193.77.5.150])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3127D37B6A1
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 09:48:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from hermes.si (primus.hermes.si [193.77.5.98])
	by guardian.hermes.si (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id SAA11933
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 18:48:08 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from uucp@localhost)
	by hermes.si (8.9.3/8.9.3) id SAA22492
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 18:48:08 +0100
Received: from lamu.hermes.si(10.17.1.230) by primus.hermes.si via smap (V2.1)
	id xma016829; Thu, 1 Feb 01 18:47:24 +0100
Received: (from mitja@localhost)
	by lamu.hermes.si (8.11.1/8.9.3) id f11HlPo71559
	for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 18:47:25 +0100 (CET)
From: Mitja Horvat <mitja.horvat@hermes.si>
Organization: Hermes SoftLab
Subject: Fwd: kevents & umount -f kernel panic
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 18:47:25 +0100
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.99]
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01020118471700.48561@lamu.hermes.si>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hi all,

since I didn't get any response on freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org I'm reposting 
this here. Hopefully nobody will get offended. It's about a panic in the 
FreeBSD kernel, 4.2-STABLE(recent cvsup), with a simple patch included.
Basically it's a bug in the kevent code, which may reference a NULL pointer 
if a process was waiting for a file growth with kevents(tail for example), 
and the filesystem holding the file was forcibly unmounted. 

It's not a serious bug, because it is triggered only on very specific 
circuimstances, but the fix is trivial so I think it's worth commiting(I have 
no commit access myself).

Should I rather send a GNATS report for such kind of bugs?

----------  Forwarded Message  ----------
Subject: kevents & umount -f kernel panic
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 17:54:57 +0100
From: Mitja Horvat <Mitja.Horvat@hermes.si>
To: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG


Hi all,

I found a bug in the FreeBSD kernel today(it's 4.2-STABLE, cvsupped today).
It is related to kevents and the umount -f option(forcibly unmounting of a
filesystem).

The bug is easily reproducible by running this simple shell script:

#/bin/sh
while true
do
        mount /cdrom
        tail -f /cdrom/SOME_FILE & sleep 1
        umount -f /cdrom
        kill %%
done

(tail uses kevent, that's why the bug is triggered).

Here's the crashdump:

IdlePTD 3485696
initial pcb at 2ce260
panicstr: page fault
panic messages:
---
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address   = 0x88
fault code              = supervisor read, page not present
instruction pointer     = 0x8:0xc017101f
stack pointer           = 0x10:0xcd37fe5c
frame pointer           = 0x10:0xcd37fe60
code segment            = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b
                        = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1
processor eflags        = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0
current process         = 26 (tail)
interrupt mask          = net tty bio cam
trap number             = 12
panic: page fault

syncing disks...
done
Uptime: 48s

dumping to dev #ad/0x30001, offset 524312
dump ata0: resetting devices .. done
255 254 253 252 251 250 249 248 247 246 245 244 243 242 241 240 239 238 237
236 235 234 233 232 231 230 229 228 227 226 225 224 223 222 221 220 219 218
217 216 215 214 213 212 211 210 209 208 207 206 205 204 203 202 201 200 199
198 197 196 195 194 193 192 191 190 189 188 187 186 185 184 183 182 181 180
179 178 177 176 175 174 173 172 171 170 169 168 167 166 165 164 163 162 161
160 159 158 157 156 155 154 153 152 151 150 149 148 147 146 145 144 143 142
141 140 139 138 137 136 135 134 133 132 131 130 129 128 127 126 125 124 123
122 121 120 119 118 117 116 115 114 113 112 111 110 109 108 107 106 105 104
103 102 101 100 99 98 97 96 95 94 93 92 91 90 89 88 87 86 85 84 83 82 81 80
79 78 77 76 75 74 73 72 71 70 69 68 67 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54
53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28
27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0
---
#0  dumpsys () at ../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:469
469             if (dumping++) {
(kgdb) where
#0  dumpsys () at ../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:469
#1  0xc013da57 in boot (howto=256) at ../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:309
#2  0xc013ddd4 in poweroff_wait (junk=0xc026d82f, howto=-872459200) at
.../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:556
#3  0xc023c361 in trap_fatal (frame=0xcd37fe1c, eva=136) at
.../../i386/i386/trap.c:951
#4  0xc023c039 in trap_pfault (frame=0xcd37fe1c, usermode=0, eva=136) at
.../../i386/i386/trap.c:844
#5  0xc023bc1f in trap (frame={tf_fs = -852033520, tf_es = -872546288, tf_ds
= -1057488880, tf_edi = -851968128, tf_esi = 0,
      tf_ebp = -851968416, tf_isp = -851968440, tf_ebx = -851935296, tf_edx =
-1057466816, tf_ecx = 0, tf_eax = 8573,
      tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 0, tf_eip = -1072230369, tf_cs = 8, tf_eflags
= 66118, tf_esp = -851935296, tf_ss = -851968276})
    at ../../i386/i386/trap.c:443
#6  0xc017101f in filt_vnread (kn=0xcd387fc0, hint=0) at
.../../kern/vfs_vnops.c:724
#7  0xc0134d55 in kqueue_scan (fp=0xc0f85840, maxevents=1, ulistp=0xbfbffbcc,
tsp=0x0, p=0xcbff5440)
    at ../../kern/kern_event.c:610
#8  0xc013479d in kevent (p=0xcbff5440, uap=0xcd37ff80) at
.../../kern/kern_event.c:391
#9  0xc023c60d in syscall2 (frame={tf_fs = 47, tf_es = 47, tf_ds =
-1078001617, tf_edi = 4, tf_esi = 4, tf_ebp = -1077937164,
      tf_isp = -851968044, tf_ebx = 672105792, tf_edx = 134526704, tf_ecx =
-1077937204, tf_eax = 363, tf_trapno = 7,
      tf_err = 2, tf_eip = 671739848, tf_cs = 31, tf_eflags = 659, tf_esp =
-1077937384, tf_ss = 47})
    at ../../i386/i386/trap.c:1150
#10 0xc0231035 in Xint0x80_syscall ()

The following patch fixes the bug for me, but since I'm far away from being a
kernel hacker I may have done something wrong, or most possibly didn't fix it
correctly. Anyway, here it is:

----8<---8<-----8<---8<----8<---8<----8<---8<----8<---8<----8<---8<---8<---8<
--- vfs_vnops.c.orig    Sun Nov 26 03:55:11 2000
+++ vfs_vnops.c Tue Jan 30 17:33:44 2001
@@ -714,6 +714,15 @@
        struct vnode *vp = (struct vnode *)kn->kn_fp->f_data;
        struct inode *ip = VTOI(vp);

+       /*
+        * If the underlying inode was freed(this can happen
+        * if the filesystem is forcibly unmounted with
+        * umount -f), return as there was activity on the file,
+        * so the process will be woken up and later it will
+        * receive an error during read XXX
+        */
+       if (ip == NULL) return 1;
+
        kn->kn_data = ip->i_size - kn->kn_fp->f_offset;
        return (kn->kn_data != 0);
 }
----8<---8<-----8<---8<----8<---8<----8<---8<----8<---8<----8<---8<---8<---8<

-------------------------------------------------------
Any comments?

Regards,
Mitja


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  9:49:10 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from msgbas1t.cos.agilent.com (msgbas1tx.cos.agilent.com [192.6.9.34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C7BE37B69C
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 09:48:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from msgrel1.and.agilent.com (msgrel1.and.agilent.com [130.30.33.104])
	by msgbas1t.cos.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDE09591
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 10:48:48 -0700 (MST)
Received: from mina.soco.agilent.com (mina.soco.agilent.com [141.121.54.157])
	by msgrel1.and.agilent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08687184
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 12:48:48 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mina.soco.agilent.com (darrylo@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mina.soco.agilent.com (8.9.3 (PHNE_18979)/8.9.3 SMKit7.1.1_Agilent) with ESMTP id JAA24803
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 09:48:47 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200102011748.JAA24803@mina.soco.agilent.com>
To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: ast0: TAPE <OnStream DI-30> 
Reply-To: Darryl Okahata <darrylo@soco.agilent.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 01 Feb 2001 18:33:11 +0100."
             <200102011733.SAA66640@freebsd.dk> 
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 1.6)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 09:48:46 -0800
From: Darryl Okahata <darrylo@soco.agilent.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Soren Schmidt <sos@freebsd.dk> wrote:

> Another thing is that for this to work, the drive has to be set into
> a 32.5Kb block mode where the 32K carry userdata, and the 512bytes
> carry block info, like blocknumber etc, since you have to have
> that info when reading, since you must keep track of which blocks
> you have read, since they might be repeated later due to bad spots
> and the above hit'n'write strategy left one double block around...
> 
> So, since I have not found a way to deal with this in a satisfactory
> way (malloc'ing 1 Mbyte worth of buffer in the kernel is not fun), the
> support we have can't handle tapes with bad spots on it...

     Does the ata device have something analogous to the SCSI
passthrough device (e.g., /dev/pass0)?  A long time ago, when I was
looking at implementing a "driver" for the SCSI version of the Onstream
drive, it was much easier to write a userland "driver" that used the
passthrough device.  This way, you can malloc() as much space as you
want (the real reason I did it that way, was because it could be much
easier to port to other operating systems).

-- 
	Darryl Okahata
	darrylo@soco.agilent.com

DISCLAIMER: this message is the author's personal opinion and does not
constitute the support, opinion, or policy of Agilent Technologies, or
of the little green men that have been following him all day.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1  9:58:12 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from harp.wrdp.com (harp.dublin.wrdp.net [212.147.130.131])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7B3537B4EC
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 09:57:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from JRAFTERY (jraftery.dublin.wrdp.net [172.16.4.52])
	by harp.wrdp.com (Postfix) with SMTP
	id E306F10AD1; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 17:57:45 +0000 (GMT)
Message-ID: <014701c08c78$c71bb5a0$340410ac@JRAFTERY>
From: "James Raftery" <jraftery@wrdp.com>
To: "Vivek Khera" <khera@kciLink.com>
Cc: "FreeBSD Stable" <stable@freebsd.org>
References: <14969.38607.142726.115583@onceler.kciLink.com><010601c08c73$c0a4fe20$340410ac@JRAFTERY> <14969.40901.952200.946573@onceler.kciLink.com>
Subject: Re: DNS security
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 17:59:53 -0000
Organization: Worldport Communications Inc
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

----- Original Message -----
From: "Vivek Khera" <khera@kciLink.com>
To: "James Raftery" <jraftery@wrdp.com>
Cc: "FreeBSD Stable" <stable@freebsd.org>
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 5:41 PM
Subject: Re: DNS security


> But that throws off the zone file directory paths... Hmm. I guess if I
> were clever enough with subdirectory tree construction I could do
> this...

There's nothing difficult about it. The 'file' statement tell named
where to find a given zone file. It can either be an absolute path or a
relative path. Relative paths are relative to the default directory
(specified with 'directory').

So, use:

zone "yourzone.com" {
    [...]
    file "/var/named/db.yourzone";
};


Regards,

james



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1 10: 3: 8 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from digital.csudsu.com (digital.csudsu.com [209.249.57.102])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1EF837B491
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 10:02:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by digital.csudsu.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 4837A22E01; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 10:05:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by digital.csudsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 37DF01F001; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 10:05:00 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 10:05:00 -0800 (PST)
From: Stefan Molnar <stefan@csudsu.com>
To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
Cc: Gordon Tetlow <gordont@bluemtn.net>,
	Vivek Khera <khera@kciLink.com>, <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: chrooting bind
In-Reply-To: <xzp4ryewbh0.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0102010954180.4036-100000@digital.csudsu.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


Please explain.  I am running named with -t /var/named and I have to
create a /dev entries, all the libs needed by named, etc.



On 1 Feb 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:

> Stefan Molnar <stefan@csudsu.com> writes:
> > you can pass -t on the command line, then you have to put /dev
> > entries like a chrooted ftp.
>
> No.
>
> DES
> --
> Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
>
>



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1 10:18:11 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86BA137B67D
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 10:17:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from des@localhost)
	by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA31776;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 19:17:47 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from des@ofug.org)
X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/
X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily
  coincide with those of any organisation or company with
  which I am or have been affiliated.
To: Stefan Molnar <stefan@csudsu.com>
Cc: Gordon Tetlow <gordont@bluemtn.net>,
	Vivek Khera <khera@kciLink.com>, <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: chrooting bind
References: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0102010954180.4036-100000@digital.csudsu.com>
From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
Date: 01 Feb 2001 19:17:46 +0100
In-Reply-To: Stefan Molnar's message of "Thu, 1 Feb 2001 10:05:00 -0800 (PST)"
Message-ID: <xzpsnlyuv1x.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
Lines: 30
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Stefan Molnar <stefan@csudsu.com> writes:
> Please explain.  I am running named with -t /var/named and I have to
> create a /dev entries, all the libs needed by named, etc.

There is no need for placing any device nodes in the sandbox.

Libraries can be avoided by linking named-xfer (which is the only
binary you need inside the sandbox) statically.

You will need /var/run and /var/tmp to exist in the sandbox and be
writeable for the bind user. You will also need a log socket in
${sandbox}/var/run; see the description of the -l option to syslogd in
the syslogd(8) man page.

You will probably want to symlink ${sandbox}/var/run/ndc to
/var/run/ndc so ndc still works without the -c option. You may want to
do the same thing with ${sandbox}/var/run/named.pid.

Ideally, everything in the sandbox except /var/run, /var/tmp and the
directory (or directories) in which you want bind to place slave zone
files and db dumps should be read-only and/or owned by a different
user.

You need to be aware of how the 'ndc restart' command works, and
possibly modify ndc to disable it, or write a wrapper for ndc, so that
you never accidentally run named outside the sandbox.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1 10:19:30 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from veldy.net (w028.z064001117.msp-mn.dsl.cnc.net [64.1.117.28])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87DAD37B4EC
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 10:19:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from HP2500B (veldy.net [64.1.117.28])
	by veldy.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 88F738C63
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 12:18:48 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <01e501c08c7b$06bb7b30$3028680a@tgt.com>
From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net>
To: <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject: ipmon and periodic
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:15:58 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

I sent this to the security list, but it didn't seem to attract any
attention - so I thought I would try it here as it is relevent.

--

Has anybody written a script or modified the current nightly periodic
scripts to send ipmon output in the security email as is currently done for
ipfw?  I have switched to ipfilter and I would like to see my daily ipmon
output - or at least the relavent stats.  I would hate to replicate the work
if it has already been done :)

Tom Veldhouse
veldy@veldy.net




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1 10:24:56 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from digital.csudsu.com (digital.csudsu.com [209.249.57.102])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C4B137B4EC
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 10:24:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: by digital.csudsu.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 98EBE22E01; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 10:26:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by digital.csudsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 875BF1F001; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 10:26:44 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 10:26:44 -0800 (PST)
From: Stefan Molnar <stefan@csudsu.com>
To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
Cc: Gordon Tetlow <gordont@bluemtn.net>,
	Vivek Khera <khera@kciLink.com>, <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: chrooting bind
In-Reply-To: <xzpsnlyuv1x.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0102011024300.4036-100000@digital.csudsu.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


I see where you are coming from now.   On this system I attempted
to be more complete, basicly give it everything, and attempt to
depend on nothing outside the sandbox.   Tho ndc does not work
well in 9.1.0

On 1 Feb 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:

> Stefan Molnar <stefan@csudsu.com> writes:
> > Please explain.  I am running named with -t /var/named and I have to
> > create a /dev entries, all the libs needed by named, etc.
>
> There is no need for placing any device nodes in the sandbox.
>
> Libraries can be avoided by linking named-xfer (which is the only
> binary you need inside the sandbox) statically.
>
> You will need /var/run and /var/tmp to exist in the sandbox and be
> writeable for the bind user. You will also need a log socket in
> ${sandbox}/var/run; see the description of the -l option to syslogd in
> the syslogd(8) man page.
>
> You will probably want to symlink ${sandbox}/var/run/ndc to
> /var/run/ndc so ndc still works without the -c option. You may want to
> do the same thing with ${sandbox}/var/run/named.pid.
>
> Ideally, everything in the sandbox except /var/run, /var/tmp and the
> directory (or directories) in which you want bind to place slave zone
> files and db dumps should be read-only and/or owned by a different
> user.
>
> You need to be aware of how the 'ndc restart' command works, and
> possibly modify ndc to disable it, or write a wrapper for ndc, so that
> you never accidentally run named outside the sandbox.
>
> DES
> --
> Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
>
>



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1 10:27:59 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from server.sarfata.sarf (APuteaux-101-1-3-171.abo.wanadoo.fr [193.251.71.171])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99B9337B503
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 10:27:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from VAIOSR1K (vaio.sarfata.sarf [192.168.45.18])
	by server.sarfata.sarf (8.11.1/8.11.1/Sarfatas cf - 21 Nov 1999') with SMTP id f11IOP130603;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 19:24:25 +0100
From: "Thomas Sarlandie" <sarfata@altern.org>
To: "Stefan Molnar" <stefan@csudsu.com>
Cc: <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: RE: chrooting bind
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 19:24:55 +0100
Message-ID: <JEELJFDIGCKJCIHHDPMEAEGCCAAA.sarfata@altern.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0102010954180.4036-100000@digital.csudsu.com>
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Importance: Normal
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

From my own experience, you will just need to create /dev/null .
I have chrooted bind on a linux box, and did not need to copy the libs into
the chroot jail, because they are loaded before bind chroots. Should work
the same way on FreeBSD, but i did not have a chance to try yet.

thomas


>
> Please explain.  I am running named with -t /var/named and I have to
> create a /dev entries, all the libs needed by named, etc.
>
>
>
> On 1 Feb 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
>
> > Stefan Molnar <stefan@csudsu.com> writes:
> > > you can pass -t on the command line, then you have to put /dev
> > > entries like a chrooted ftp.
> >
> > No.
> >
> > DES
> > --
> > Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org
> >
> >
> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
> >
> >
>
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
>



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1 10:30:17 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from wall.polstra.com (rtrwan160.accessone.com [206.213.115.74])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BD6E37B65D
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 10:30:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vashon.polstra.com (vashon.polstra.com [206.213.73.13])
	by wall.polstra.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f11ITv272188;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 10:29:57 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jdp@wall.polstra.com)
Received: (from jdp@localhost)
	by vashon.polstra.com (8.11.1/8.11.0) id f11ITuG06484;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 10:29:56 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jdp)
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 10:29:56 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <200102011829.f11ITuG06484@vashon.polstra.com>
To: stable@freebsd.org
From: John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com>
Reply-To: stable@freebsd.org
Cc: khera@kciLink.com
Subject: Re: DNS security
In-Reply-To: <14969.38607.142726.115583@onceler.kciLink.com>
References: <14969.38607.142726.115583@onceler.kciLink.com>
Organization: Polstra & Co., Seattle, WA
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In article <14969.38607.142726.115583@onceler.kciLink.com>,
Vivek Khera  <khera@kciLink.com> wrote:
> 2) bind tries to write temporary files into the CWD.  Unfortunately,
>    /etc/namedb is root:wheel and not writable by the bind process
>    owner.  There doesn't seem to be a parameter to bind to tell it
>    where to write those files, but there is an environment variable,
>    DSTKEYPATH, that can be used.
> 
> The problem I have is how to make FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE pass that
> environment variable to bind during boot.  There doesn't seem to be a
> good way to do that with the stock startup scripts.  For now, I'm just
> going to start bind in /etc/rc.local and turn it off from rc.conf.

Try putting this in your rc.conf file:

    named_program="env DSTKEYPATH=/var/tmp named"

I haven't tried it, but it ought to work.  You can probably even
omit the word "env".

John
-- 
  John Polstra                                               jdp@polstra.com
  John D. Polstra & Co., Inc.                        Seattle, Washington USA
  "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence."  -- Chögyam Trungpa



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1 10:32: 9 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3415A37B4EC
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 10:31:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from des@localhost)
	by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA31864;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 19:31:44 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from des@ofug.org)
X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/
X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily
  coincide with those of any organisation or company with
  which I am or have been affiliated.
To: Stefan Molnar <stefan@csudsu.com>
Cc: Gordon Tetlow <gordont@bluemtn.net>,
	Vivek Khera <khera@kciLink.com>, <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: chrooting bind
References: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0102011024300.4036-100000@digital.csudsu.com>
From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
Date: 01 Feb 2001 19:31:43 +0100
In-Reply-To: Stefan Molnar's message of "Thu, 1 Feb 2001 10:26:44 -0800 (PST)"
Message-ID: <xzpk87auueo.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
Lines: 20
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Stefan Molnar <stefan@csudsu.com> writes:
> I see where you are coming from now.   On this system I attempted
> to be more complete, basicly give it everything

That totally defeats the point of running in a sandbox.

>                                                  and attempt to
> depend on nothing outside the sandbox.

The point is to have as little as possible inside the sandbox. You
need named-xfer if you have slave zones, but you do not need any other
binaries, you do not need any libraries (link named-xfer statically!)
and you certainly don't need any device nodes.

ANYTHING YOU PUT IN THE SANDBOX WILL BE AVAILABLE TO INTRUDERS WHEN
THEY BREAK INTO YOUR SYSTEM.
 
DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1 10:38:37 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from digital.csudsu.com (digital.csudsu.com [209.249.57.102])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E28B37B4EC
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 10:38:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by digital.csudsu.com (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 648E922E01; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 10:40:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by digital.csudsu.com (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 552141F001; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 10:40:12 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 10:40:12 -0800 (PST)
From: Stefan Molnar <stefan@csudsu.com>
To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
Cc: Gordon Tetlow <gordont@bluemtn.net>,
	Vivek Khera <khera@kciLink.com>, <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: chrooting bind
In-Reply-To: <xzpk87auueo.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0102011038530.4036-100000@digital.csudsu.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


I am not putting the entire kitchen sink in there.

On 1 Feb 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:

> Stefan Molnar <stefan@csudsu.com> writes:
> > I see where you are coming from now.   On this system I attempted
> > to be more complete, basicly give it everything
>
> That totally defeats the point of running in a sandbox.
>
> >                                                  and attempt to
> > depend on nothing outside the sandbox.
>
> The point is to have as little as possible inside the sandbox. You
> need named-xfer if you have slave zones, but you do not need any other
> binaries, you do not need any libraries (link named-xfer statically!)
> and you certainly don't need any device nodes.
>
> ANYTHING YOU PUT IN THE SANDBOX WILL BE AVAILABLE TO INTRUDERS WHEN
> THEY BREAK INTO YOUR SYSTEM.
>
> DES
> --
> Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
>
>



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1 11: 1:32 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from yertle.kciLink.com (yertle.kciLink.com [208.184.13.195])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E3A437B4EC
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 11:01:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from onceler.kciLink.com (onceler.kciLink.com [208.184.13.196])
	by yertle.kciLink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0848D2E440
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 14:01:11 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from khera@localhost)
	by onceler.kciLink.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f11J1Au16510;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 14:01:10 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from khera)
From: Vivek Khera <khera@kciLink.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <14969.45686.870515.585152@onceler.kciLink.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 14:01:10 -0500
To: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: DNS security
In-Reply-To: <200102011829.f11ITuG06484@vashon.polstra.com>
References: <14969.38607.142726.115583@onceler.kciLink.com>
	<200102011829.f11ITuG06484@vashon.polstra.com>
X-Mailer: VM 6.90 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>>>>> "JP" == John Polstra <jdp@polstra.com> writes:

JP> Try putting this in your rc.conf file:

JP>     named_program="env DSTKEYPATH=/var/tmp named"

Thanks.  All I have to say for myself is "duh!" ;-)


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1 11:20:29 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from eng05.embratel.net.br (eng05.embratel.net.br [200.255.125.133])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B3D4D37B4EC; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 11:20:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from jonny.eng.br (willow [200.255.125.142])
	by eng05.embratel.net.br (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C177A24D35; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 17:19:57 -0200 (BRST)
Message-ID: <3A79B707.3DF0B6D@jonny.eng.br>
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 17:20:39 -0200
From: Joao Carlos Mendes Luis <jonny@jonny.eng.br>
Organization: Internet via Embratel
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Win95; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@aciri.org>
Cc: yusufg@outblaze.com, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG,
	freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, phk@freebsd.org
Subject: Solved: Bridging and dummynet seems to destroy dmesg output
References: <200101312212.f0VMCHj08290@iguana.aciri.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Luigi Rizzo wrote:
> 
> >     I tried only removing DUMMYNET from config, and the bug continues.  Should
> > I try the changes below?
> 
> no-they only affect dummynet. But this seems to suggest that
> the problem is unrelated to my changes...
> 
>         cheers
>         luigi

Hi,

    I found the problem!

    I started searching for the point where ipfw writes to the msgbuf, and
like all other kernel modules, it uses the log(9) function.  But differently
from the other modules, ip_fw.c uses a LOG_SECURITY argument.  I removed it,
recompiled, reboot, and BINGO!  Probably the log(9) function does not expect a
facility parameter, as it is assumed to be LOG_KERNEL.

    Searching the cvsweb tree, I assume the changes that made it fail were
made to kern/subr_prf.c, and not directly to netinet/ip_fw.c.  Probably a
longer search should be made to detect if any other call to log(9) uses this
approach.  (CC: to phk, who made the change to kern/subr_prf.c, 1.61.2.1, at
2000.01.16)

    Hoping this is the final solution and waiting for the cvs commit, thanks
to everybody,

                                        Jonny

-- 
Joćo Carlos Mendes Luķs                 jonny@embratel.net.br
  Networking Engineer                   jonny@jonny.eng.br
 Internet via Embratel			jcml@ieee.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1 11:41:11 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from iguana.aciri.org (iguana.aciri.org [192.150.187.36])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C1AD237B699; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 11:40:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from rizzo@localhost)
	by iguana.aciri.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f11Je7561000;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 11:40:07 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from rizzo)
From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@aciri.org>
Message-Id: <200102011940.f11Je7561000@iguana.aciri.org>
Subject: Re: Solved: Bridging and dummynet seems to destroy dmesg output
In-Reply-To: <3A79B707.3DF0B6D@jonny.eng.br> from Joao Carlos Mendes Luis at "Feb 1, 2001  5:20:39 pm"
To: jonny@jonny.eng.br (Joao Carlos Mendes Luis)
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 11:40:07 -0800 (PST)
Cc: rizzo@aciri.org, yusufg@outblaze.com, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG,
	freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, phk@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL43 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

thanks for tracking this problem -- it also explains
why i did not see it in my environment, as i have a mostly 4.2-R
system with new code in net/ and netinet/

	cheers
	luigi

> Hi,
> 
>     I found the problem!
> 
>     I started searching for the point where ipfw writes to the msgbuf, and
> like all other kernel modules, it uses the log(9) function.  But differently
> from the other modules, ip_fw.c uses a LOG_SECURITY argument.  I removed it,
> recompiled, reboot, and BINGO!  Probably the log(9) function does not expect a
> facility parameter, as it is assumed to be LOG_KERNEL.
> 
>     Searching the cvsweb tree, I assume the changes that made it fail were
> made to kern/subr_prf.c, and not directly to netinet/ip_fw.c.  Probably a
> longer search should be made to detect if any other call to log(9) uses this
> approach.  (CC: to phk, who made the change to kern/subr_prf.c, 1.61.2.1, at
> 2000.01.16)
> 
>     Hoping this is the final solution and waiting for the cvs commit, thanks
> to everybody,


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1 12:10:39 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from romulus.bhi-net.com (romulus.bhi-net.com [204.253.245.10])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51FE437B69F
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 12:10:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bsssysvsc01 (204-253-245-34.bhi-net.com [204.253.245.34] (may be forged))
	by romulus.bhi-net.com (8.9.2/8.9.0) with SMTP id OAA29267
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 14:10:20 -0600 (CST)
Received: FROM omnibus.aws.waii.com BY bsssysvsc01 ; Thu Feb 01 14:03:26 2001 -0600
Received: from slpalmer ([172.18.10.212]) by omnibus.aws.waii.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA01263; Thu, 1 Feb 01 14:10:10 CST
Message-Id: <02c001c08c8c$2cc25fe0$d40a12ac@bakerhughes.com>
From: "Stephen L. Palmer" <slpalmer@mail.com>
To: <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject: 4.2 RELEASE -> STABLE - segmentation faults all over the place
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 14:18:43 -0600
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_02BD_01C08C59.E1D255D0"
X-Priority: 3
X-Msmail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_02BD_01C08C59.E1D255D0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I did a clean install of 4.2-release from CD a couple days ago, and have =
been attempting to upgrade to 4.2-stable since then.
I've not been having much success, due to the amount of segmentation =
faults I'm getting.  Various random programs will start seg =
faulting-core dumping, and I'll have to reboot to regain functionality.  =
at one point, login was seg faulting, (luckily I had a terminal open to =
the machine) and I had to reboot before anyone could login.  I've used =
various FreeBSD's from 2.1 - 4.0, but have been away since shortly after =
4.0-Release.  If this a know problem?  I searched the archives, but =
could not find anything....

Stephen L. Palmer
slpalmer@mail.com

------=_NextPart_000_02BD_01C08C59.E1D255D0
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4134.600" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>I did a clean install of&nbsp;4.2-release from CD a =
couple=20
days ago, and have been attempting to upgrade to 4.2-stable since=20
then.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>I've not been having much success, due to the amount =
of=20
segmentation faults I'm getting.&nbsp; Various random programs will =
start seg=20
faulting-core dumping, and I'll have to reboot to regain =
functionality.&nbsp; at=20
one point, login was seg faulting, (luckily I had a terminal open to the =

machine) and I had to reboot before anyone could login.&nbsp; I've used =
various=20
FreeBSD's from 2.1 - 4.0, but have been away since shortly after=20
4.0-Release.&nbsp; If this a know problem?&nbsp; I searched the =
archives, but=20
could not find anything....</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>Stephen L. Palmer</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT size=3D2>slpalmer@mail.com</FONT></DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_02BD_01C08C59.E1D255D0--



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1 12:32:50 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from post.mail.nl.demon.net (post-10.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.20])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B29E37B65D
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 12:32:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [212.238.77.116] (helo=gateway.raggedclown.intra)
	by post.mail.nl.demon.net with smtp (Exim 3.14 #2)
	id 14OQP8-0005GF-00; Thu, 01 Feb 2001 20:32:31 +0000
Received: by buffy.raggedclown.net (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.0 (i386), from userid 500)
	id 9EDB212D5F; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 21:16:17 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 21:16:17 +0100
From: Cliff Sarginson <cliff@raggedclown.net>
To: Vivek Khera <khera@kciLink.com>
Cc: FreeBSD Stable <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: DNS security
Message-ID: <20010201211617.A1056@raggedclown.net>
References: <14969.38607.142726.115583@onceler.kciLink.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <14969.38607.142726.115583@onceler.kciLink.com>; from khera@kciLink.com on Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 12:03:11PM -0500
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 12:03:11PM -0500, Vivek Khera wrote:
> The problem I have is how to make FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE pass that
> environment variable to bind during boot.  There doesn't seem to be a
> good way to do that with the stock startup scripts.  For now, I'm just
> going to start bind in /etc/rc.local and turn it off from rc.conf.
> 
> Does it seem like a good idea to be able to set the BIND environment
> variables from the stock rc scripts?  If so, could someone add this?

You could try "env var=value bind" ?

Cliff


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1 12:36:40 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from resnet.uoregon.edu (resnet.uoregon.edu [128.223.122.47])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id DF12237B491; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 12:36:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost)
	by resnet.uoregon.edu (8.10.1/8.10.1) with ESMTP id f11Ka6B06115;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:36:10 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:36:06 -0800 (PST)
From: Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu>
To: Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il>
Cc: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>,
	Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>, Paul Saab <paul@mu.org>,
	freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Really odd "BTX halted" problem booting - PXE/diskless
In-Reply-To: <E14N95Z-0004Zw-00@cs.huji.ac.il>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0102011235250.853-100000@resnet.uoregon.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Mon, 29 Jan 2001, Danny Braniss wrote:

> im now being bitten by this one, but with a twist:
>  on a compaq deskpro workstation it's ok
>  on a dell-precision 420, it bombs.
> both bioses are configured to boot via the network/pxe.
> 
> im using the same disks for both boxes.
> 
> i labeled the disks with:
>  dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/rda0 bs=1k count=1
>  disklabel -Brw da0 auto

This is a bug in the adaptec BIOS. Don't do this for boot disks. Use
fdisk/real slices instead.

Doug White                    |  FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu     |  www.FreeBSD.org



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1 12:38:22 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mailhost.duncllc.com (216.198.75.2.cypresscom.net [216.198.75.2])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 505B137B491
	for <stable@FreeBSD.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 12:38:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from noc06.duncllc.com (noc06.duncllc.com [192.168.69.163])
	by mailhost.duncllc.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f11Kc2B16171
	for <stable@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 14:38:02 -0600
Received: from rednu.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by noc06.duncllc.com (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA14901
	for <stable@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 14:38:02 -0600 (CST)
From: rhuber@rednu.com
Message-ID: <3A79C92A.5A38A40D@rednu.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 14:38:02 -0600
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; SunOS 5.7 sun4u)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: stable@FreeBSD.org
Subject: subscribe
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1 12:54:29 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from obsecurity.org (adsl-64-169-104-72.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.169.104.72])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBF2C37B4EC
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 12:54:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: by obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id DA87EBA0CB; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 12:54:38 -0800 (PST)
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 12:54:38 -0800
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: "Stephen L. Palmer" <slpalmer@mail.com>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: 4.2 RELEASE -> STABLE - segmentation faults all over the place
Message-ID: <20010201125438.A73711@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <02c001c08c8c$2cc25fe0$d40a12ac@bakerhughes.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <02c001c08c8c$2cc25fe0$d40a12ac@bakerhughes.com>; from slpalmer@mail.com on Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 02:18:43PM -0600
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


--G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 02:18:43PM -0600, Stephen L. Palmer wrote:

> I did a clean install of 4.2-release from CD a couple days ago, and
> have been attempting to upgrade to 4.2-stable since then.  I've not
> been having much success, due to the amount of segmentation faults
> I'm getting.  Various random programs will start seg faulting-core
> dumping, and I'll have to reboot to regain functionality.  at one
> point, login was seg faulting, (luckily I had a terminal open to the
> machine) and I had to reboot before anyone could login.  I've used
> various FreeBSD's from 2.1 - 4.0, but have been away since shortly
> after 4.0-Release.  If this a know problem?  I searched the
> archives, but could not find anything....

Sounds like you either have some serious corruption, or your hardware
is going flaky.

Kris

--G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6ec0OWry0BWjoQKURAqQ3AKDdpz/KEP9QBvJ+lc8xTSzHBpSzjACgzKqS
XD35HzHw3RZBVhtivsfw7oE=
=IE9C
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--G4iJoqBmSsgzjUCe--


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1 13:12: 1 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mta01-svc.ntlworld.com (mta01-svc.ntlworld.com [62.253.162.41])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A3C637B491
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 13:11:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from witchspace.com ([213.105.80.86]) by mta01-svc.ntlworld.com
          (InterMail vM.4.01.02.27 201-229-119-110) with ESMTP
          id <20010201211138.DYR6427.mta01-svc.ntlworld.com@witchspace.com>
          for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 21:11:38 +0000
Message-ID: <3A79D163.E2AD1EFC@witchspace.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 21:13:07 +0000
From: Jonathan Belson <jon@witchspace.com>
Organization: Jon's Place
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE i386)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Kernel panic writing to ZIP disk 8^(
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hiya


I suffered a kernel panic after trying to write
to a MS-DOS ZIP disk.  It is repeatable with both
my kernel and the GENERIC (non-SMP) one.

I mounted the disk with the command

mount_msdos /dev/afd0s1 /dos

and the fault code was 'supervisor read, page not
present'

Apart from the embarassment of having my machine
crash in front of two friends (after having extolled
the virtuals of unix to them 8^), I think this is
a serious problem which needs to be looked into.

How do I report this bug, with all the information
needed to find it?

I'm running -stable supped yesterday on a dual
Pentium 2 with 128 Megs.


-- 
C-YA
Jon

<http://www.witchspace.com>


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1 13:22:45 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from gekko.i-clue.de (server.ms-agentur.de [62.153.134.194])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D90D37B4EC
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 13:22:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from i-clue.de (automatix.i-clue.de [192.168.0.112])
	by gekko.i-clue.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) with ESMTP id XAA21832;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 23:30:13 +0100
Message-ID: <3A79D3EA.8D29D652@i-clue.de>
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 22:23:54 +0100
From: Christoph Sold <so@server.i-clue.de>
Reply-To: so@server.i-clue.de
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.75 [de] (WinNT; U)
X-Accept-Language: de
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Jonathan Belson <jon@witchspace.com>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Kernel panic writing to ZIP disk 8^(
References: <3A79D163.E2AD1EFC@witchspace.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

man send-pr tells you how to send problem reports, it's default values
send them to the FreeBSD project.

HTH
-Christoph Sold

Jonathan Belson schrieb:
> 
> Hiya
> 
> I suffered a kernel panic after trying to write
> to a MS-DOS ZIP disk.  It is repeatable with both
> my kernel and the GENERIC (non-SMP) one.
> 
> I mounted the disk with the command
> 
> mount_msdos /dev/afd0s1 /dos
> 
> and the fault code was 'supervisor read, page not
> present'
> 
> Apart from the embarassment of having my machine
> crash in front of two friends (after having extolled
> the virtuals of unix to them 8^), I think this is
> a serious problem which needs to be looked into.
> 
> How do I report this bug, with all the information
> needed to find it?
> 
> I'm running -stable supped yesterday on a dual
> Pentium 2 with 128 Megs.
> 
> --
> C-YA
> Jon
> 
> <http://www.witchspace.com>
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

-- 
Freundliche Grüße aus Waiblingen

Christoph Sold
--
Systemadministrator, i-clue GmbH, Endersbacher Str. 57, 71334 Waiblingen
Fon: (0 71 51) 9 59 01-12, Fax: (0 71 51) 9 59 01-55, Mail: so@i-clue.de


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1 13:46:27 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from ashburn.skiltech.com (ashburn.skiltech.com [216.235.79.239])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B5DC37B491
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 13:46:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from minter@localhost)
	by ashburn.skiltech.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f11Lk4c96588;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 16:46:04 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from minter)
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 16:46:04 -0500 (EST)
From: "H. Wade Minter" <minter@lunenburg.org>
X-X-Sender:  <minter@ashburn.skiltech.com>
To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
Cc: <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: chrooting bind
In-Reply-To: <xzpitmuwc2p.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.32.0102011645180.96214-100000@ashburn.skiltech.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

This did the trick.

Is there any way to get that NOSHARED=YES line to remain between cvsups,
or will I have to edit it every time I buildworld?

--Wade

On 1 Feb 2001, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:

> "H. Wade Minter" <minter@lunenburg.org> writes:
> > I'm trying to chroot bind-8.2.3-REL on a spare slave server as a test.
> > I'm doing this by copying the normal dynamically-linked binaries and
> > libraries into the chroot jail.
>
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=293748+0+current/freebsd-security
>
> Look for "Instructions for running BIND in a chroot sandbox" about
> halfway down.
>
> DES
> --
> Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org
>



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1 14: 6:52 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.rpi.edu (mail.rpi.edu [128.113.100.7])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2F8FF37B491; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 14:06:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.acs.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47])
	by mail.rpi.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA274836;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 17:05:40 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Sender: drosih@mail.rpi.edu
Message-Id: <p05010401b69f8dd262cc@[128.113.24.47]>
In-Reply-To: 
 <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101311850220.51115-100000@utterlux.hq.communitconnect.com>
References: 
 <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101311850220.51115-100000@utterlux.hq.communitconnect.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 17:05:39 -0500
To: Marius <marius@mail.communityconnect.com>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG
From: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>
Subject: Re: Multiple dropped thttpd connections under high load.
Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

At 7:13 PM -0500 1/31/01, Marius wrote:
>I am running the same thttpd binary as I did on 3.5-Stable.
>I copied over a fresh image from a companion machine recently.
>Since it works under light/medium load on the machine, I didn't
>think it needed to be recompiled.

I would go with the latest port for thttpd, and rebuild that
on your 4.2-stable system.  There have also been improvements
to thttpd, and you should pick those up even if the older
version did work.

-- 
Garance Alistair Drosehn            =   gad@eclipse.acs.rpi.edu
Senior Systems Programmer           or  gad@freebsd.org
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute    or  drosih@rpi.edu


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1 14:17:20 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from utterlux.hq.communitconnect.com (unknown [206.28.215.90])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3FC0937B4EC; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 14:16:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (marius@localhost)
	by utterlux.hq.communitconnect.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f11MFwP97003;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 17:15:58 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from marius@mail.communityconnect.com)
X-Authentication-Warning: utterlux.hq.communitconnect.com: marius owned process doing -bs
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 17:15:58 -0500 (EST)
From: Marius <marius@mail.communityconnect.com>
X-Sender: marius@utterlux.hq.communitconnect.com
To: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>
Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG, questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Multiple dropped thttpd connections under high load.
In-Reply-To: <p05010401b69f8dd262cc@[128.113.24.47]>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0102011710520.89201-100000@utterlux.hq.communitconnect.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


I havn't quite gotten around to rebuilding thttpd as people kindly
suggested. Actually, the port of thttpd is an older version of thttpd then We 
are running, so it is not just a matter of rebuilding a port.  And
secondly, it is a highly customized version of thttpd, patched in several
places to work better with out local setup.  It is not a trivial matter,
but I guess that _is_ what I will have to try next.  I have been putting
it off.

Thank you for the suggestions folks.  I'll try to report back when I make
some progress for interested parties.  (other thttpd users etc.)  

-Marius

On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Garance A Drosihn wrote:

> At 7:13 PM -0500 1/31/01, Marius wrote:
> >I am running the same thttpd binary as I did on 3.5-Stable.
> >I copied over a fresh image from a companion machine recently.
> >Since it works under light/medium load on the machine, I didn't
> >think it needed to be recompiled.
> 
> I would go with the latest port for thttpd, and rebuild that
> on your 4.2-stable system.  There have also been improvements
> to thttpd, and you should pick those up even if the older
> version did work.
> 
> -- 
> Garance Alistair Drosehn            =   gad@eclipse.acs.rpi.edu
> Senior Systems Programmer           or  gad@freebsd.org
> Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute    or  drosih@rpi.edu
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
> 




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1 14:19: 7 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [194.221.183.20])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5236237B503
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 14:18:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 17507 invoked by uid 0); 1 Feb 2001 22:18:39 -0000
Received: from tk212017108240.univie.teleweb.at (HELO bender.ant.net) (212.17.108.240)
  by mail.gmx.net (mp009-rz3) with SMTP; 1 Feb 2001 22:18:39 -0000
Received: (from root@localhost)
	by bender.ant.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f11NH5P01289;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 23:17:05 GMT
	(envelope-from root)
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 23:17:05 +0000
From: Andreas Ntaflos <ntaflos.andreas@gmx.net>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: librep/sawfish installation failing...
Message-ID: <20010201231705.A829@bender.ant.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

hello
has anyone been able to successfully install librep and sawfish lately?
the current version of librep is 0.13.4 and I can't seem to get it right. I install
it from the ports collection, but 'configure' fails with the following output:

===>  Patching for librep-0.13.4
===>  Applying FreeBSD patches for librep-0.13.4
===>  Configuring for librep-0.13.4
./test: ./src/rep: not found
./test: ./src/rep: not found
[....]

interestingly, src/rep does not exist
there is a file named rep-config.sh, but it is no good. renaming rep-config.sh to rep
doesn't help either.

obviusly, ./configure calls ./test, and this refers to some non-existing
command in src...this really annoys.


so is it just me, or has anyone else experienced similar problems?

anyone?
-- 
thanks & regards
Andreas Ntaflos


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1 14:29:15 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from earth.backplane.com (earth-nat-cw.backplane.com [208.161.114.67])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8155C37B491
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 14:28:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from dillon@localhost)
	by earth.backplane.com (8.11.1/8.9.3) id f11MSg735305;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 14:28:42 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dillon)
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 14:28:42 -0800 (PST)
From: Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>
Message-Id: <200102012228.f11MSg735305@earth.backplane.com>
To: Chris Byrnes <chris@JEAH.net>
Cc: Vivek Khera <khera@kciLink.com>,
	FreeBSD Stable <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: DNS security
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.21.0102011129290.62920-100000@awww.jeah.net>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


:cd /etc
:chown -R bind:bind namedb
:chmod 700 namedb
:
:
:-- Chris

    Never do this.  /etc/namedb and all files in it should be owned by
    root.  Bind should never be allowed to write to those files or that
    directory.  Only the secondary-zone subdirectory (typically /etc/namedb/s)
    should be owned by bind:bind

				-Matt


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1 15:18:25 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from shrine.soth.at (shrine.soth.at [212.186.158.182])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75BCF37B491
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 15:18:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from titan.soth.at (titan.soth.at [172.30.1.5])
	by shrine.soth.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DB3768A01
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 00:18:01 +0100 (CET)
Received: (from soth@localhost)
	by titan.soth.at (8.11.1/8.11.0) id f11NI1O27061;
	Fri, 2 Feb 2001 00:18:01 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from soth)
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 00:18:01 +0100
From: Toni Andjelkovic <toni@soth.at>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: aic7xxx hangs 4.2-STABLE
Message-ID: <20010202001801.T403@titan.soth.at>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

hi,

the STABLE release has a problem with
the aic7xxx SCSI driver and a 7810 controller.
my machine will hang when i try to boot it:


ahc0: <Adaptec aic7810 RAID memory controller> port 0xd800-0xd8ff mem 0xe7000000
-0xe71fffff,0xe4800000-0xe4800fff irq 12 at device 0.0 on pci1
RAID functionality unsupported
<...> hangs


a STABLE build of December 27 works, it will deliver the following output:

ahc0: <Adaptec aic7810 RAID memory controller> port 0xd800-0xd8ff mem 0xe7000000
-0xe71fffff,0xe4800000-0xe4800fff irq 12 at device 0.0 on pci1
RAID functionality unsupported
device_probe_and_attach: ahc0 attach returned 6
ahc1: <Adaptec 398X Ultra SCSI RAID adapter> port 0xd400-0xd4ff mem 0xe4000000-0
xe4000fff irq 12 at device 4.0 on pci1
aic7880: Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=7, 16/255 SCBs


this probably happens somewhere in ahc_pci_config,
after the entry->setup() routine.

cheers,
-- 
Toni Andjelkovic
<toni@soth.at>



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1 15:43:13 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from finch-post-11.mail.demon.net (finch-post-11.mail.demon.net [194.217.242.39])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D03537B4EC
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 15:42:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shootthemlater.demon.co.uk ([194.222.93.84] helo=cerebus.parse.net)
	by finch-post-11.mail.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 2.12 #1)
	id 14OTNN-000IkV-0B
	for stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 23:42:54 +0000
Received: from terim.putney.parse.net ([10.0.0.5] helo=dmg-win.acm.org)
	by cerebus.parse.net with esmtp (Exim 3.16 #1)
	id 14OTMh-000PNK-00
	for stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 01 Feb 2001 23:42:11 +0000
Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.0.20010201232046.009f0930@cerebus.parse.net>
X-Sender: dmg@cerebus.parse.net (Unverified)
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 23:42:33 +0000
To: stable@freebsd.org
From: David Goddard <goddard@acm.org>
Subject: quotacheck -a taking *ages* on boot
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hi,

I've been having some problems with my last two buildworlds (18 and 30 Jan) 
on a remote machine - the first of these, it took about half an hour 
between booting and being able to log in or access any services (i.e. 
before sshd and all the other daemons start) and the second was up to about 
an hour.  Looking through the logs, it seems that the delay comes just 
after named starts up - at about the time quotacheck happens.  Manually 
running quotacheck confirms that this step is taking a looong time.

I have two filesystems with quotas enabled, and df shows that they aren't 
particularly full:

Filesystem  1K-blocks     Used    Avail Capacity  Mounted on
...
/dev/ad0s1f   6450348     5924  5928397     0%    /home
/dev/ad2s1f  13804609   796544 11903697     6%    /data

The number of files on them hasn't increased much over time either, so I 
can't work out why my boot times are deteriorating so much.

They are only IDE drives, but the machine isn't exactly low-spec and I'm 
surprised at the amount of time this is taking - the fact that things have 
got worse recently raises suspicions in my mind at least.

I guess I can turn quotas off (I have plenty of space anyway for the time 
being) and it's not as if the machine gets booted often, but it troubles 
me.  Any clues would be appreciated...

Dave



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1 17:46:37 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from dante.naver.co.id (unknown [202.155.86.83])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id DA22937B4EC; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 17:42:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: by dante.naver.co.id (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 9C589536DE; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 08:43:10 +0700 (JAVT)
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 08:43:10 +0700
From: John Indra <john@office.naver.co.id>
To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc: Eraldo Jr <eraldo_j@yahoo.com>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: - i810 is only supported on Linux/x86 -
Message-ID: <20010202084310.B78334@office.naver.co.id>
Mail-Followup-To: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.ORG>,
	Eraldo Jr <eraldo_j@yahoo.com>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
References: <20010201130711.27533.qmail@web4406.mail.yahoo.com> <20010201160303.A38766@sunbay.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20010201160303.A38766@sunbay.com>; from ru@FreeBSD.ORG on Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 04:03:03PM +0200
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.2.5i on FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 04:03:03PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:

>FreeBSD had support for running XFree86 4.0.X on i810
>starting with 4.1-RELEASE.

True.

>XFree86 supports FreeBSD on i810 natively starting with
>release 4.0.2.

Hmm...
But -CURRENT and -STABLE doesn't work smoothly with XFree86 4.0.2 installed
from ports (at least on Intel 81x chipsets).

I (and many others) have experienced problems with XFree86 4.0.2 such as:
- X died if you switch back and forth to consoles
- Many apps died with SIG 10 (bus error)

/john



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1 18:49:12 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from smtp1.sentex.ca (smtp1.sentex.ca [199.212.134.4])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99C2B37B6D7
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 18:48:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from simoeon.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [209.112.4.47])
	by smtp1.sentex.ca (8.11.2/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f122m2b77567;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 21:48:03 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Message-Id: <5.0.1.4.0.20010201213224.02e8e2e0@marble.sentex.ca>
X-Sender: mdtpop@marble.sentex.ca
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.1
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 21:41:29 -0500
To: Soren Schmidt <sos@freebsd.dk>
From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
Subject: Re: ast0: TAPE <OnStream DI-30>
Cc: stable@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <200102011733.SAA66640@freebsd.dk>
References: <4.2.2.20010201104340.013e00d8@marble.sentex.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

At 06:33 PM 2/1/01 +0100, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> > ruby2# tar -b 4096 -c -f /dev/nrast0 altq-3.0
> > tar: can't write to /dev/nrast0 : Input/output error
> >
> > It just gives a series of
> > ast0: bad request, must be multiple of 32768
> > ast0: bad request, must be multiple of 32768
> > ast0: bad request, must be multiple of 32768
> > ast0: bad request, must be multiple of 32768
> > ast0: bad request, must be multiple of 32768
> > ast0: bad request, must be multiple of 32768
> >
> > no matter what block size I try.
>
>You havn't what it says to you ie 32k blocksize ie:
>
>tar cvbf 64 /dev/rast0 bla bla....

Thanks, yes it does work with 64, the one multiple I did not try.


>I have a drive here that onstream sent me back when with docs, but to be
>brutally honest the drive and especially the firmaware sucks..

Yes, I figure it was a "cheap" drive in every sense.  I was hoping that it 
could act as a sort of backup to a backup.  For my important servers, we 
have dat drives, and for others where the situation makes sense, we use 
rsync with ssh to dump the data onto big cheap IDE drives on another 
server.  I was looking for a way to periodically backup these IDE drives 
and was hoping the Onstream drives would do the trick. We have had way too 
many bad travan tapes so we dont want to go with them. I thought I would 
give the onstream a try to see how it did.

         ---Mike



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1 19:20:29 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.gmx.net (sproxy.gmx.net [194.221.183.20])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7C91837B491
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 19:20:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 4450 invoked by uid 0); 2 Feb 2001 03:20:10 -0000
Received: from pd9508830.dip.t-dialin.net (HELO speedy.gsinet) (217.80.136.48)
  by mail.gmx.net (mail06) with SMTP; 2 Feb 2001 03:20:10 -0000
Received: (from sittig@localhost)
	by speedy.gsinet (8.8.8/8.8.8) id WAA17803
	for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 22:00:27 +0100
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 22:00:27 +0100
From: Gerhard Sittig <Gerhard.Sittig@gmx.net>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ipmon and periodic
Message-ID: <20010201220026.J253@speedy.gsinet>
Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
References: <01e501c08c7b$06bb7b30$3028680a@tgt.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i
In-Reply-To: <01e501c08c7b$06bb7b30$3028680a@tgt.com>; from veldy@veldy.net on Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 12:15:58PM -0600
Organization: System Defenestrators Inc.
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 12:15 -0600, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
> 
> Has anybody written a script or modified the current nightly
> periodic scripts to send ipmon output in the security email as
> is currently done for ipfw?  I have switched to ipfilter and I
> would like to see my daily ipmon output - or at least the
> relavent stats.

Look at /usr/ports/security/logcheck and have this program watch
/var/log/ipflog (or wherever logs go to).  Or use any other log
scanner.  You don't want to learn about bad things happened after
it's too late, do you? :>

BTW: logcheck is handy for other logs, too!


virtually yours   82D1 9B9C 01DC 4FB4 D7B4  61BE 3F49 4F77 72DE DA76
Gerhard Sittig   true | mail -s "get gpg key" Gerhard.Sittig@gmx.net
-- 
     If you don't understand or are scared by any of the above
             ask your parents or an adult to help you.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1 19:41:56 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from benzine.rootprompt.net (mail.rootprompt.net [208.53.161.252])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85A9137B4EC
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 19:41:39 -0800 (PST)
From: "Robert Banniza" <robert@rootprompt.net>
To: <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject: Layer 4 load balancing...
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 21:41:26 -0800
Message-ID: <GMEDKMKMEBENJMBLDHAIKEOFCNAA.robert@rootprompt.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
In-Reply-To: <20010201220026.J253@speedy.gsinet>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

This may not be the right place to discuss this but I think it's worth a
shot. I have been looking at the Linux Virtual Server project lately to find
a solution of Layer 4 switching (load balancing) for web/ftp/smtp for the
ISP I work for. I have noticed that the only type solution found for *BSD is
the BigIP F5 hardware appliance running their own software with BSDi as the
OS. I was wondering if anyone has thought of or made plans to incorporate
some type of layer 4 switching into FreeBSD whether it is built into the
kernel or whether it could be part of ports. I would like to "try" (I use
this term loosely as I have no idea what I'm doing) as get something going
like this for FreeBSD. I would also like for the solution to be open source
as Layer 4 switches are expensive and there are not a lot of free solutions
out. Anyone have any opinions on the idea? Maybe I'm way off topic here but
I would at least like to start here. I need be, I will move the discussion
elsewhere where it properly belongs.

Robert



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1 20:18:58 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.66])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C05937B503
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 20:18:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f124IY935918;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 21:18:34 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Message-Id: <200102020418.f124IY935918@harmony.village.org>
To: Maxime Henrion <mux@qualys.com>
Subject: Re: - i810 is only supported on Linux/x86 - 
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, Eraldo Jr <eraldo_j@yahoo.com>
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 01 Feb 2001 14:36:09 +0100."
		<20010201143609.A351@nebula.cybercable.fr> 
References: <20010201143609.A351@nebula.cybercable.fr>  <20010201130711.27533.qmail@web4406.mail.yahoo.com> 
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2001 21:18:34 -0700
From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In message <20010201143609.A351@nebula.cybercable.fr> Maxime Henrion writes:
: No, there is an agp.ko kernel module for FreeBSD which provides a
: /dev/agpgart and thus allows FreeBSD users to run XFree with such
: cards.

Speaking of intel cards, I have a new mobo that has a Intel 1132
graphics chip on it.  At least that's what the boot messages in dmesg
call it.  I looked in vain for which chipset to use to support this
chip.  Any ideas?

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1 21: 9:44 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from gatekeeper.orem.verio.net (gatekeeper.orem.verio.net [192.41.0.8])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 37BDB37B491; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 21:09:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx.dmz.orem.verio.net (mx.dmz.orem.verio.net [10.1.1.10])
	by gatekeeper.orem.verio.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C10F23BF118; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 22:09:25 -0700 (MST)
Received: from vespa.dmz.orem.verio.net (vespa.dmz.orem.verio.net [10.1.1.59])
	by mx.dmz.orem.verio.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f1259In83274;
	Thu, 1 Feb 2001 22:09:19 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from fclift@verio.net)
Date: Thu, 1 Feb 2001 22:33:47 -0700 (MST)
From: Fred Clift <fclift@verio.net>
X-Sender: fred@vespa.dmz.orem.verio.net
To: Doug White <dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu>
Cc: Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il>,
	John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.ORG>,
	Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com>, Paul Saab <paul@mu.org>,
	freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Really odd "BTX halted" problem booting - PXE/diskless
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0102011235250.853-100000@resnet.uoregon.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0102012232080.65714-100000@vespa.dmz.orem.verio.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Doug White wrote:

> This is a bug in the adaptec BIOS. Don't do this for boot disks. Use
> fdisk/real slices instead.

Or possibly, dont do this for any disk in the system.  Some bioses choke
even on non-boot disks with DD partitioning...

Fred

--
Fred Clift - fclift@verio.net -- Remember: If brute 
force doesn't work, you're just not using enough.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1 21:21:21 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.oregonfast.net (mail.oregonfast.net [63.228.228.11])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5623A37B491
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 21:21:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 97420 invoked by uid 89); 2 Feb 2001 05:21:01 -0000
Message-ID: <20010202052101.97419.qmail@mail.oregonfast.net>
From: "Dan Langille" <dan@evilcode.com>
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: panic: ufs_dirbad: bad dir
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 05:21:01 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Sender: dan@evilcode.com
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

I recently upgraded a box from 4.1-stable to 4.2-stable. An NFS mount was
used for the install world and install kernel.  During the kernel install
the box panic'd (sorry, didn't see the message).  Upon boot, the box give
these messages: 

Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a
/: bad dir ino 2 at offset 0: mangled entry
panic: ufs_dirbad: bad dir 

syncing disks.... 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1..etc
giving up on 1 buffers 


I did an fsck on the disk by moving it to another box. The above messages
appeared both before and after the fsck. 

Clues please! 

-- 
Dan Langille - novice in training
[my thanks to evilcode.com for the emergency email access]


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1 21:24: 3 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from easynet-gw.netvalue.fr (unknown [212.180.121.161])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E44BF37B491
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 21:23:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.netvalue.fr (unknown [192.168.1.13])
	by easynet-gw.netvalue.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3CEB8C52
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 06:25:46 +0100 (CET)
Received: from mail-hk.netvalue.fr ([192.168.100.13]) by mail.netvalue.fr
          (Netscape Messaging Server 3.6)  with ESMTP id AAA54B7
          for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 06:23:17 +0100
Received: from erwan.netvalue.fr ([192.168.100.100]) by
          mail-hk.netvalue.fr (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP
          id G846Y100.QO2; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 13:22:49 +0800 
Received: from netvalue.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by erwan.netvalue.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 178361A09; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 13:22:49 +0800 (HKT)
Message-ID: <3A7A4428.F327E80D@netvalue.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 13:22:48 +0800
From: Erwan Arzur <erwan@netvalue.com>
Organization: NetValue Ltd.
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386)
X-Accept-Language: en, fr-FR
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net>
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ipmon and periodic
References: <01e501c08c7b$06bb7b30$3028680a@tgt.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

"Thomas T. Veldhouse" wrote:
> 
> I sent this to the security list, but it didn't seem to attract any
> attention - so I thought I would try it here as it is relevent.
> 
> --
> 
> Has anybody written a script or modified the current nightly periodic
> scripts to send ipmon output in the security email as is currently done for
> ipfw?  I have switched to ipfilter and I would like to see my daily ipmon
> output - or at least the relavent stats.  I would hate to replicate the work
> if it has already been done :)
> 
> Tom Veldhouse
> veldy@veldy.net
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

I did something like that.

* copy and edit (adjust perl's path) /usr/src/contrib/ipfilter/perl/plog
to /root/plog
* patch /etc/security 

164a165,171
> if [ -x /root/plog ]; then
>       if [ -f ${LOG}/ipmon.log ]; then
>               echo '${host} ipfilter blocked packets:'
>               /root/plog -nSA block < ${LOG}/ipmon.log
>       fi
> fi
>       
184a192
>       

/root/plog is not the most appropriate location, i know ;-)

Be careful to adjust /etc/newsyslog.conf so your ipmon log is rotated
just after this script is ran, else you have a window open where some
logged packets will not be in this report. I'd like to find a way to
rotate it from /etc/security, but did not came out with an obvious
solution. The most appropriate would be to split newsyslog into two
commands, one for scheduling the rotation and another for actually
rotating the logfiles ...
--
Erwan Arzur
NetValue ltd.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1 21:38:38 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.oregonfast.net (mail.oregonfast.net [63.228.228.11])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5B33D37B491
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 21:38:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 98632 invoked by uid 89); 2 Feb 2001 05:38:17 -0000
Message-ID: <20010202053817.98631.qmail@mail.oregonfast.net>
References: <20010202052101.97419.qmail@mail.oregonfast.net>
In-Reply-To: <20010202052101.97419.qmail@mail.oregonfast.net> 
From: "James" <daemus@oregonfast.net>
To: "Dan Langille" <dan@evilcode.com>
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: panic: ufs_dirbad: bad dir
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 05:38:17 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Sender: daemus@oregonfast.net
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

What part of the kernel install did it panic on? (if you even saw that part) 
Have you tried booting the previous kernel? I'm not sure if it'll even 
boot... but, you might want to try that.

You might also wanna try installing the same /kernel and /modules that you 
were when it panic'd, while you have the drive mounted on another box. 

Just an idea or two. 


Dan Langille writes: 

> I recently upgraded a box from 4.1-stable to 4.2-stable. An NFS mount was
> used for the install world and install kernel.  During the kernel install
> the box panic'd (sorry, didn't see the message).  Upon boot, the box give
> these messages:  
> 
> Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a
> /: bad dir ino 2 at offset 0: mangled entry
> panic: ufs_dirbad: bad dir  
> 
> syncing disks.... 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1..etc
> giving up on 1 buffers  
> 
> 
> I did an fsck on the disk by moving it to another box. The above messages
> appeared both before and after the fsck.  
> 
> Clues please!  
> 
> -- 
> Dan Langille - novice in training
> [my thanks to evilcode.com for the emergency email access] 
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1 21:48:15 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.oregonfast.net (mail.oregonfast.net [63.228.228.11])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 943FC37B491
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 21:47:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 99362 invoked by uid 89); 2 Feb 2001 05:47:51 -0000
Message-ID: <20010202054751.99361.qmail@mail.oregonfast.net>
References: <20010202052101.97419.qmail@mail.oregonfast.net>
            <20010202053817.98631.qmail@mail.oregonfast.net>
In-Reply-To: <20010202053817.98631.qmail@mail.oregonfast.net> 
From: "Dan Langille" <dan@evilcode.com>
To: "James" <daemus@oregonfast.net>
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: panic: ufs_dirbad: bad dir
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 05:47:51 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Sender: dan@evilcode.com
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

James writes:

> What part of the kernel install did it panic on? (if you even saw that 
> part) 

Sorry, I forgot to mention that.  Here is what was left on my remote screen
after the panic: 

root@ducky:/usr/src/sys/compile/DUCKY] # make install
chflags noschg /kernel
mv /kernel /kernel.old
install -c -m 555 -o root -g wheel -fschg  kernel /kernel
if [ -d /modules -a -n "`ls /modules`" ]; then  mkdir -p /modules.old;  cp 
 -p /modules/* /modules.old;  fi; 


> Have you tried booting the previous kernel? I'm not sure if it'll 
> even boot... but, you might want to try that.

I tried the old kernel, but it failed to get past the probing.  I can't
remember the messages, but it was something like "isa_?? cannot get ports
for le...... cannot get irq for le". 

> You might also wanna try installing the same /kernel and /modules that you 
> were when it panic'd, while you have the drive mounted on another box. 

There is no /kernel.old any more.  I have installed the new 4.2 kernel
when the drive was mounted in another box.  Its that kernel which produce
the messages below. 

Thanks. 

> Dan Langille writes:  
> 
>> I recently upgraded a box from 4.1-stable to 4.2-stable. An NFS mount was
>> used for the install world and install kernel.  During the kernel install
>> the box panic'd (sorry, didn't see the message).  Upon boot, the box give
>> these messages:   
>> 
>> Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a
>> /: bad dir ino 2 at offset 0: mangled entry
>> panic: ufs_dirbad: bad dir   
>> 
>> syncing disks.... 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1..etc
>> giving up on 1 buffers   
>> 
>> 
>> I did an fsck on the disk by moving it to another box. The above messages
>> appeared both before and after the fsck.   
>> 
>> Clues please!   
>> 
>> -- 
>> Dan Langille - novice in training
>> [my thanks to evilcode.com for the emergency email access]  
>> 
>> 
>> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
>> with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
> 
 


-- 
Dan Langille - novice in training 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1 22:21:59 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.oregonfast.net (mail.oregonfast.net [63.228.228.11])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CA31E37B67D
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 22:21:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 1882 invoked by uid 89); 2 Feb 2001 06:21:38 -0000
Message-ID: <20010202062138.1881.qmail@mail.oregonfast.net>
References: <20010202052101.97419.qmail@mail.oregonfast.net>
            <20010202053817.98631.qmail@mail.oregonfast.net>
In-Reply-To: <20010202053817.98631.qmail@mail.oregonfast.net> 
From: "Dan Langille" <dan@evilcode.com>
To: "James" <daemus@oregonfast.net>
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: panic: ufs_dirbad: bad dir
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 06:21:38 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Sender: dan@evilcode.com
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

After a suggestion offlist, here's the additional information from a
boot -v: 

Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a
ad0s1: type 0xa5, start 63, end = 2503871, size 2503809 : OK
/: bad dir ino 2 at offset 0: mangled entry
panic: ufs_dirbad: bad dir 

syncing disks.... 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1..etc
giving up on 1 buffers 

thanks folks.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1 22:27:21 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from veldy.net (w028.z064001117.msp-mn.dsl.cnc.net [64.1.117.28])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B931637B4EC
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 22:27:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cascade (cascade.veldy.net [192.168.0.1])
	by veldy.net (Postfix) with SMTP id C5C368C5A
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 00:26:39 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <000f01c08ce0$ff8abfe0$0100a8c0@cascade>
From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net>
To: <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject: IPFilter 3.4.16? ftp-proxy and bimap broken on 3.4.8?
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 00:25:55 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Can anybody lead me to a method of installing ipfilter 3.4.16 onto a FreeBSD
4.2-STABLE (02012000) machine?  I am having trouble with 3.4.8 that comes
standard with FreeBSD.  It seems that the ftp-data port is not properly
handled during ftp proxy and bimap does not seem to work either.  It seems
to translate outgoing packets OK, but incoming packets (setup) do not ever
reach the internal machines.  The ftp-proxy seems to fail no matter whether
I run nat using bimap or map the entire address range to one IP address.

Here are the options I am using in /etc/ipnat.rules:

--
# allow transparent proxy of ftp
map dc1 0.0.0.0/0 -> 0/32 proxy port 21 ftp/tcp

# run nat for our internal network
#map dc1 192.168.0.0/24 -> 0/32 portmap tcp/udp 30000:50000
bimap dc1 192.168.0.1/32 -> xx.xx.xx.xx/32
bimap dc1 192.168.0.2/32 -> yy.yy.yy.yy/32
bimap dc1 192.168.0.4/32 -> zz.zz.zz.zz/32
--

Thanks in advance,

Tom Veldhouse
veldy@veldy.net




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Thu Feb  1 23: 2: 5 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.rdc2.il.home.com (ha2.rdc2.il.home.com [24.2.1.36])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 367D737B491
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu,  1 Feb 2001 23:01:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from marx.marvic.chum ([24.17.229.11]) by mail.rdc2.il.home.com
          (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with ESMTP
          id <20010202070147.FIVM6684.mail.rdc2.il.home.com@marx.marvic.chum>
          for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Thu, 1 Feb 2001 23:01:47 -0800
Received: (from vcardona@localhost)
	by marx.marvic.chum (8.9.3/8.9.3/SuSE Linux 8.9.3-0.1) id BAA05420
	for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 01:05:42 -0600
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 01:05:42 -0600
From: "Victor R. Cardona" <vcardona@home.com>
To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: IPFilter 3.4.16? ftp-proxy and bimap broken on 3.4.8?
Message-ID: <20010202010542.A5384@home.com>
Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
References: <000f01c08ce0$ff8abfe0$0100a8c0@cascade>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <000f01c08ce0$ff8abfe0$0100a8c0@cascade>; from veldy@veldy.net on Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 12:25:55AM -0600
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 12:25:55AM -0600, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:
> Can anybody lead me to a method of installing ipfilter 3.4.16 onto a FreeBSD
> 4.2-STABLE (02012000) machine?  I am having trouble with 3.4.8 that comes
> standard with FreeBSD.  It seems that the ftp-data port is not properly
> handled during ftp proxy and bimap does not seem to work either.  It seems
> to translate outgoing packets OK, but incoming packets (setup) do not ever
> reach the internal machines.  The ftp-proxy seems to fail no matter whether
> I run nat using bimap or map the entire address range to one IP address.

If you install as a kernel module, then I believe you just follow the
instructions in the INSTALL.FreeBSD file. If you actually build it into
the kernel, then you must modify the instructions a bit.

make freebsd4

make install-bsd

Freebsd-4.0/kinstall

change "#include <osreldate.h>" to "#include <sys/osreldate.h>" in
several files in /usr/src/sys/netinet/ (sorry cannot remember which
ones)

<rebuld kernel>

reboot

HTH,
-- 
Victor R. Cardona 
GnuPG Key fingerprint = 62B1 7995 A830 432C 74E8  1337 EDDB E682 3C76 7404



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2  0: 8:51 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from freebsd.dk (freebsd.dk [212.242.42.178])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0965B37B503
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 00:08:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from sos@localhost)
	by freebsd.dk (8.9.3/8.9.1) id JAA74472;
	Fri, 2 Feb 2001 09:08:25 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from sos)
From: Soren Schmidt <sos@freebsd.dk>
Message-Id: <200102020808.JAA74472@freebsd.dk>
Subject: Re: ast0: TAPE <OnStream DI-30>
In-Reply-To: <5.0.1.4.0.20010201213224.02e8e2e0@marble.sentex.ca> from Mike Tancsa at "Feb 1, 2001 09:41:29 pm"
To: mike@sentex.net (Mike Tancsa)
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 09:08:25 +0100 (CET)
Cc: stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL54 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

It seems Mike Tancsa wrote:
> >tar cvbf 64 /dev/rast0 bla bla....
> 
> Thanks, yes it does work with 64, the one multiple I did not try.

why is it always that way :)

> >I have a drive here that onstream sent me back when with docs, but to be
> >brutally honest the drive and especially the firmaware sucks..
> 
> Yes, I figure it was a "cheap" drive in every sense.  I was hoping that it 
> could act as a sort of backup to a backup.  For my important servers, we 
> have dat drives, and for others where the situation makes sense, we use 
> rsync with ssh to dump the data onto big cheap IDE drives on another 
> server.  I was looking for a way to periodically backup these IDE drives 
> and was hoping the Onstream drives would do the trick. We have had way too 
> many bad travan tapes so we dont want to go with them. I thought I would 
> give the onstream a try to see how it did.

Well, as I said, supporting it is not impossible, its just "different"
from the way most *ix drivers like things. However if this is important
to you or somebody else, I could be persuaded into looking at this...

-Sųren


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2  0:27:40 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from axis.tdd.lt (axis.tdd.lt [193.219.211.5])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EDB337B4EC
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 00:27:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (midom@localhost)
	by axis.tdd.lt (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f128RIP07167
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 10:27:18 +0200 (EET)
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 10:27:17 +0200 (EET)
From: Domas Mituzas <domas.mituzas@delfi.lt>
X-Sender: midom@axis.tdd.lt
To: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: our BIND jail implementation
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0102021016100.2984-100000@axis.tdd.lt>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hi,

I saw a lot of discussions about implementing secure (or just
sandboxed) bind solution. We had an approach of building bind in such
manner, that was most secure. Security breaches could happen both from
administrative user acces, both from insecure software. Therefore, we've
got a jail with two users - dnsadmin and bind. Both of them are in bind
group (actually I was loughing out loud, when I saw uid and gid of bind
user (53:53 - perfect! :) Therefore we built a chroot sandbox for jail
with such tree:

/ - 750 root:bind
 run/ - bind:bind 750 pids, log sockets, temporary zone transfer files, etc
 slave/ - bind:bind 750 slave zone cache files
 data/ - dnsadmin:bind 750 master zone data
 admin/ - ~dnsadmin dnsadmin:bind 700
 log/ - bind:bind 750
 named.conf - dnsadmin:bind 640
 named-xfer - root:bind 750

Of course, it's necessary to tweak pathnames.h, so dns would find exact
locations. named-xfer was statically linked binary, which put temporary
transfers in run/. 

ndc was tweaked to find control socket in $BINDROOT/run/ndc. Moreover,
control socket was made to be bind:bind 660, so regular zone administrator
could do simple zone reload.
logs were configured to be put in logs/ with special size restrictions

Ah, and the last thing I forgot to mention - it works! :)

Domas



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2  1:18:23 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from smtp1.sentex.ca (smtp1.sentex.ca [199.212.134.4])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 516BA37B4EC
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 01:18:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from simoeon.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [209.112.4.47])
	by smtp1.sentex.ca (8.11.2/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f129HHM57122;
	Fri, 2 Feb 2001 04:17:17 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Message-Id: <5.0.1.4.0.20010202040716.01f2b3d0@marble.sentex.ca>
X-Sender: mdtpop@marble.sentex.ca
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.1
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 04:10:42 -0500
To: Soren Schmidt <sos@freebsd.dk>
From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
Subject: Re: ast0: TAPE <OnStream DI-30>
Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <200102020808.JAA74472@freebsd.dk>
References: <5.0.1.4.0.20010201213224.02e8e2e0@marble.sentex.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

At 09:08 AM 2/2/01 +0100, Soren Schmidt wrote:

>Well, as I said, supporting it is not impossible, its just "different"
>from the way most *ix drivers like things. However if this is important
>to you or somebody else, I could be persuaded into looking at this...


I differ to your judgement of course.  If the drive is hopelessly broken 
from a design point of view, then there does not seem to be much point in 
supporting it.  But if it can work to a reasonable degree, then I am all 
for it.  Like I said before, its potentially low cost combined with their 
claimed reliability of their media over travan tape technology do make it 
potentially appealing for certain applications.

         ---Mike



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2  1:23:25 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mass.dis.org (unknown [216.240.45.41])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F99037B4EC
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 01:23:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mass.dis.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by mass.dis.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f129MTM12429;
	Fri, 2 Feb 2001 01:22:29 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from msmith@mass.dis.org)
Message-Id: <200102020922.f129MTM12429@mass.dis.org>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999
To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
Cc: Soren Schmidt <sos@freebsd.dk>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: ast0: TAPE <OnStream DI-30> 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 02 Feb 2001 04:10:42 EST."
             <5.0.1.4.0.20010202040716.01f2b3d0@marble.sentex.ca> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 01:22:29 -0800
From: Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> At 09:08 AM 2/2/01 +0100, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> 
> >Well, as I said, supporting it is not impossible, its just "different"
> >from the way most *ix drivers like things. However if this is important
> >to you or somebody else, I could be persuaded into looking at this...
> 
> 
> I differ to your judgement of course.  If the drive is hopelessly broken 
> from a design point of view, then there does not seem to be much point in 
> supporting it.  But if it can work to a reasonable degree, then I am all 
> for it.  Like I said before, its potentially low cost combined with their 
> claimed reliability of their media over travan tape technology do make it 
> potentially appealing for certain applications.

Media cost for these devices is horrific, due to their relatively low 
volume.  A $200 drive is false economy when the tapes for it are $70 a 
pop...

-- 
... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his
rivals and unfortunately opponents also.  But not because people want
to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force
people to take different points of view.  [Dr. Fritz Todt]
           V I C T O R Y   N O T   V E N G E A N C E




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2  1:28:38 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from smtp1.sentex.ca (smtp1.sentex.ca [199.212.134.4])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 3191537B491; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 01:28:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from simoeon.sentex.net (simeon.sentex.ca [209.112.4.47])
	by smtp1.sentex.ca (8.11.2/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f129SKM59259;
	Fri, 2 Feb 2001 04:28:20 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Message-Id: <5.0.1.4.0.20010202041945.02288cb0@marble.sentex.ca>
X-Sender: mdtpop@marble.sentex.ca
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.1
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 04:21:44 -0500
To: Mike Smith <msmith@FreeBSD.ORG>
From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
Subject: Re: ast0: TAPE <OnStream DI-30> 
Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <200102020922.f129MTM12429@mass.dis.org>
References: <Your message of "Fri, 02 Feb 2001 04:10:42 EST." <5.0.1.4.0.20010202040716.01f2b3d0@marble.sentex.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

At 01:22 AM 2/2/01 -0800, Mike Smith wrote:

>Media cost for these devices is horrific, due to their relatively low
>volume.  A $200 drive is false economy when the tapes for it are $70 a
>pop...

They are much cheaper than that.  Without shopping around, I bought a 
single one for $53 CDN which is about $35 USD.  In reasonable quantity they 
are about $30 each for the 30 gig version.

         ---Mike



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2  2: 5:23 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from tzeench.dhs.org (h24-70-93-66.ed.shawcable.net [24.70.93.66])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81B5937B503
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 02:05:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (darren@localhost)
	by tzeench.dhs.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f12A57b74469
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 03:05:07 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from darren@tzeench.dhs.org)
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 03:05:07 -0700 (MST)
From: Darren <darren@tzeench.dhs.org>
To: <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: riva tnt2 ultra tv-out
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.32.0102020302370.74331-100000@tzeench.dhs.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

hi, ok well straight to the point, I own a RIVA TNT2 ULTRA.  I would like
to make use of it's tv-out.  hoping someone here will know of a
development project or anything to use the feature.

-Darren



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2  2:36:16 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6830C37B503
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 02:35:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from des@localhost)
	by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.3/8.9.3) id LAA35026;
	Fri, 2 Feb 2001 11:35:54 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from des@ofug.org)
X-URL: http://www.ofug.org/~des/
X-Disclaimer: The views expressed in this message do not necessarily
  coincide with those of any organisation or company with
  which I am or have been affiliated.
To: "H. Wade Minter" <minter@lunenburg.org>
Cc: <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: chrooting bind
References: <Pine.BSF.4.32.0102011645180.96214-100000@ashburn.skiltech.com>
From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org>
Date: 02 Feb 2001 11:35:54 +0100
In-Reply-To: "H. Wade Minter"'s message of "Thu, 1 Feb 2001 16:46:04 -0500 (EST)"
Message-ID: <xzpg0hxv0c5.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
Lines: 9
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0802 (Gnus v5.8.2) Emacs/20.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

"H. Wade Minter" <minter@lunenburg.org> writes:
> Is there any way to get that NOSHARED=YES line to remain between cvsups,
> or will I have to edit it every time I buildworld?

I imagine the cvsup documentation could answer your question.

DES
-- 
Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@ofug.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2  3:36: 3 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from bg.sics.se (bg.sics.se [193.10.66.124])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE49137B401
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 03:35:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from bg@localhost)
	by bg.sics.se (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f12BaAu36688;
	Fri, 2 Feb 2001 12:36:10 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from bg)
To: David Goddard <goddard@acm.org>
Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: quotacheck -a taking *ages* on boot
References: <5.0.2.1.0.20010201232046.009f0930@cerebus.parse.net>
From: Bjoern Groenvall <bg@sics.se>
Date: 02 Feb 2001 12:36:09 +0100
In-Reply-To: David Goddard's message of "Thu, 01 Feb 2001 23:42:33 +0000"
Message-ID: <wuelxh5nbq.fsf@bg.sics.se>
Lines: 27
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.6
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>>>>> "David" == David Goddard <goddard@acm.org> writes:

David> Manually running quotacheck confirms that this step is taking a
David> looong time.

As I understand this, quotacheck takes time proportional to the number
of used inodes *and* proportional to the size of the file system.

You don't have to run quotacheck on every reboot. Only if you have to
run fsck is it necessary to run quotacheck. Also, even if fsck
repaired the filesystem, the old quota state is probably a good enough
approximation of the current (real) quota state. If you want to, you
may instead run quotacheck sometime later to rebuild a consistent
quota state.

If you put check_quotas="NO" in rc.conf you will achieve this effect.

Cheers,
Björn

-- 
  _     _                                               ,_______________.  
Bjorn Gronvall (Björn Grönvall)                        /_______________/|     
Swedish Institute of Computer Science                  |               ||
PO Box 1263, S-164 29 Kista, Sweden                    | Schroedingers ||
Email: bg@sics.se, Phone +46 -8 633 15 25              |      Cat      |/
Cellular +46 -70 768 06 35, Fax +46 -8 751 72 30       `---------------' 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2  4:28: 8 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mouse.gvr.org (madisongurkha6.iae.nl [212.61.21.69])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B40337B4EC
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 04:27:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from guido@localhost)
	by mouse.gvr.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f12CRg009407;
	Fri, 2 Feb 2001 13:27:42 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from guido)
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 13:27:42 +0100
From: Guido van Rooij <guido@mouse.gvr.org>
To: Domas Mituzas <domas.mituzas@delfi.lt>
Cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: our BIND jail implementation
Message-ID: <20010202132742.A8681@eniac.mpn.cp.philips.com>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0102021016100.2984-100000@axis.tdd.lt>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0102021016100.2984-100000@axis.tdd.lt>; from domas.mituzas@delfi.lt on Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 10:27:17AM +0200
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 10:27:17AM +0200, Domas Mituzas wrote:
> logs were configured to be put in logs/ with special size restrictions
> 

I use syslogd -l /chroot/var/run/log and use syslog for logging..

-Guido


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2  4:57: 8 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from server02.belenus.com (unknown [212.63.129.190])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C536737B401
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 04:56:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: by server02.belenus.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
	id <CZJ1HR5C>; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 13:56:45 +0100
Message-ID: <B14AF62CDA08D4118B8C00508B44A0B5154F3C@server02.belenus.com>
From: "Schmalzbauer, Harald" <H.Schmalzbauer@belenus.com>
To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: AW: IPFilter 3.4.16? ftp-proxy and bimap broken on 3.4.8?
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 13:56:37 +0100 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello,

there is a problem with ftp-proxy in IPF versions prior to 3.4.14. I =
hope
that the newer version will get as soon as possible to -stable.

1. Do a make freebsd4, make install-bsd
Take care that you don't have two different versions of the binaries. I =
can
remember that the install-bsd puts some of them in different =
directories and
doesn't override all the FreeBSD standard files.
2. In FreeBSD-4.0/ copy the IPv6-pathc-4.1 to IPv6-patch-4.2 (I haven't
tried 3.4.16 yet, but you had to do so for 3.4.14)
Also for 3.4.14 you have to edit ip_log.c and ip_compat.c. Find
"osreldate.h" (once per file) and change it to "sys/osreldate.h"
Then run kinstall.

This should work but as mentioned I haven't tried 3.4.16 yet but I =
think
Darren didn't change anything since 3.4.14 considering FreeBSD-install.

- -Harry


belenus GmbH
Harald Schmalzbauer
Sys/Net Admin
Tel: +49 (89) 21979-120
Fax: +49 (89) 21979-111
www.belenus.com



> -----Urspr=FCngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Thomas T. Veldhouse [mailto:veldy@veldy.net]
> Gesendet: Freitag, 2. Februar 2001 07:26
> An: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
> Betreff: IPFilter 3.4.16? ftp-proxy and bimap broken on 3.4.8?
>=20
>=20
> Can anybody lead me to a method of installing ipfilter 3.4.16=20
> onto a FreeBSD
> 4.2-STABLE (02012000) machine?  I am having trouble with=20
> 3.4.8 that comes
> standard with FreeBSD.  It seems that the ftp-data port is=20
> not properly
> handled during ftp proxy and bimap does not seem to work=20
> either.  It seems
> to translate outgoing packets OK, but incoming packets=20
> (setup) do not ever
> reach the internal machines.  The ftp-proxy seems to fail no=20
> matter whether
> I run nat using bimap or map the entire address range to one=20
> IP address.
>=20
> Here are the options I am using in /etc/ipnat.rules:
>=20
> --
> # allow transparent proxy of ftp
> map dc1 0.0.0.0/0 -> 0/32 proxy port 21 ftp/tcp
>=20
> # run nat for our internal network
> #map dc1 192.168.0.0/24 -> 0/32 portmap tcp/udp 30000:50000
> bimap dc1 192.168.0.1/32 -> xx.xx.xx.xx/32
> bimap dc1 192.168.0.2/32 -> yy.yy.yy.yy/32
> bimap dc1 192.168.0.4/32 -> zz.zz.zz.zz/32
> --
>=20
> Thanks in advance,
>=20
> Tom Veldhouse
> veldy@veldy.net
>=20
>=20
>=20
>=20
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
>=20

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5.2

iQA/AwUBOnqgdlXEptsBus8cEQITMACfY6TimOpoOT+FoiJOa8rjcPRx300An3JS
rFE91lxUWACTWjnMdmD1Y29j
=3DEa+0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2  5:37: 8 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from AMSPRV-SMTP02.prv.versatel.com (unknown [62.58.16.73])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1EFF37B4EC
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 05:36:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from amshqb-exch02.versatel.com ([10.205.18.36]) by AMSPRV-SMTP02.prv.versatel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.1600);
	 Fri, 2 Feb 2001 14:37:25 +0100
Received: by AMSHQB-EXCH02 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
	id <1AZ2KNMA>; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 14:37:23 +0100
Message-ID: <77A588078DF6D3118C0A00508B8E036703875810@AMSHQB-EXCH02>
From: Lisa Goulet <Lisa.Goulet@versatel.nl>
To: "'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject: ssh after upgrade to 4.2
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 14:37:16 +0100 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Feb 2001 13:37:25.0323 (UTC) FILETIME=[472021B0:01C08D1D]
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


Hi all,

I've upgraded to 4.2 and since then the ssh(default one) shows the error:

Feb  2 14:15:29 testbsd sshd[414]: no modules loaded for `sshd' service
Feb  2 14:15:29 testbsd sshd[414]: fatal: PAM session setup failed[6]:
Permission denied
Feb  2 14:15:29 testbsd sshd[414]: no modules loaded for `sshd' service


How can I fix this?  I would like to keep the changes to a minimum as these
are production servers.

Thanks and regards,
Lisa


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2  5:43:15 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from thehousleys.net (frenchknot.ne.mediaone.net [24.147.224.201])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95FF637B503
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 05:42:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from thehousleys.net (baby.int.thehousleys.net [192.168.0.24])
	by thehousleys.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f12Dffh00389;
	Fri, 2 Feb 2001 08:41:41 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from jim@thehousleys.net)
Message-ID: <3A7AB915.7101829A@thehousleys.net>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 08:41:41 -0500
From: James Housley <jim@thehousleys.net>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.12 i386)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Lisa Goulet <Lisa.Goulet@versatel.nl>
Cc: "'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: ssh after upgrade to 4.2
References: <77A588078DF6D3118C0A00508B8E036703875810@AMSHQB-EXCH02>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Lisa Goulet wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I've upgraded to 4.2 and since then the ssh(default one) shows the error:
> 
> Feb  2 14:15:29 testbsd sshd[414]: no modules loaded for `sshd' service
> Feb  2 14:15:29 testbsd sshd[414]: fatal: PAM session setup failed[6]:
> Permission denied
> Feb  2 14:15:29 testbsd sshd[414]: no modules loaded for `sshd' service
> 
> How can I fix this?  I would like to keep the changes to a minimum as these
> are production servers.
> 
Did you run mergemaster after your upgrade?  Because that would have
given you the option to update /etc/pam.conf.

Jim
-- 
/"\   ASCII Ribbon Campaign  .
\ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail  .
 X  - NO Word docs in e-mail .
/ \ -----------------------------------------------------------------
jeh@FreeBSD.org      http://www.FreeBSD.org     The Power to Serve
jim@TheHousleys.Net  http://www.TheHousleys.net
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me in your ~/.signature
to help me spread!             <- Save this lifeform ;-)


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2  5:43:39 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from clueless.crownhouse.net (clueless.crownhouse.net [195.217.221.3])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C569437B4EC
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 05:43:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [62.190.249.139] (HELO:garfield.innovisiongroup.com) by clueless.crownhouse.net
	for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org;
	Fri, 02 Feb 2001 13:43:06 +0000
Message-ID: <010801c08d1e$4b8f6d40$650e850a@innovisiongroup.com>
From: "Jonathan Belson" <jon@witchspace.com>
To: "Lisa Goulet" <Lisa.Goulet@versatel.nl>,
	<freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
References: <77A588078DF6D3118C0A00508B8E036703875810@AMSHQB-EXCH02>
Subject: Re: ssh after upgrade to 4.2
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 13:43:26 -0000
Organization: Jon's Place
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>
> Hi all,
>
> I've upgraded to 4.2 and since then the ssh(default one) shows the error:
>
> Feb  2 14:15:29 testbsd sshd[414]: no modules loaded for `sshd' service
> Feb  2 14:15:29 testbsd sshd[414]: fatal: PAM session setup failed[6]:
> Permission denied
> Feb  2 14:15:29 testbsd sshd[414]: no modules loaded for `sshd' service
>
> How can I fix this?  I would like to keep the changes to a minimum as
these
> are production servers.

Did you run 'mergemaster' to update /etc/pam.conf?


--
C-YA
Jon

<http://www.witchspace.com>




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2  6: 5:11 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from accord.grasslake.net (accord.grasslake.net [206.11.249.240])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A469237B401
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 06:04:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from marlowe (accord.grasslake.net [206.11.249.240])
	by accord.grasslake.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id f12DxrI05423
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 07:59:53 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from swb@grasslake.net)
Message-ID: <020b01c08d21$4544fc40$b8209fc0@marlowe>
From: "Shawn Barnhart" <swb@grasslake.net>
To: <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: syslog.conf host selection uses only short host name?
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 08:05:59 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Is the 'correct' behavior of syslog.conf when using the "+hostname"
selection to manage remote host logging to only use the "short" hostname?

If I do:

+machine.domain.tld
ftp.*    /var/log/machine.ftp

I don't get my traffic logged, but if I use:

+machine
ftp.*    /var/log/machine.ftp

I do.  It strikes me that I should be able to select on the fqdn.  The
manpage says "hostname", which I've always assumed to be the fqdn.  The
default output of hostname(1) on my 4.2-STABLE machines is the fqdn.

In an ideal world, it'd be nice to use the fqdn AND wildcards, especially if
managing remote logging from many machines or domains where the short
hostname may have duplicates.  I guess I should submit a patch for the
manpage that stipulates the + selector for syslog.conf is "short" hostnames
(ala hostname -s), and not fqdn.





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2  6:18:59 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from AMSPRV-SMTP02.prv.versatel.com (unknown [62.58.16.73])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26F9437B401
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 06:18:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from amshqb-exch02.versatel.com ([10.205.18.36]) by AMSPRV-SMTP02.prv.versatel.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.1600);
	 Fri, 2 Feb 2001 15:19:14 +0100
Received: by AMSHQB-EXCH02 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
	id <1AZ2K3A1>; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 15:19:13 +0100
Message-ID: <77A588078DF6D3118C0A00508B8E036703875812@AMSHQB-EXCH02>
From: Lisa Goulet <Lisa.Goulet@versatel.nl>
To: 'James Housley' <jim@thehousleys.net>,
	Lisa Goulet <Lisa.Goulet@versatel.nl>
Cc: "'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: RE: ssh after upgrade to 4.2
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 15:19:06 +0100 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 02 Feb 2001 14:19:14.0962 (UTC) FILETIME=[1EFCA720:01C08D23]
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Thanks all, mergemaster did the trick.

Regards,
Lisa

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	James Housley [SMTP:jim@thehousleys.net]
> Sent:	Friday, February 02, 2001 2:42 PM
> To:	Lisa Goulet
> Cc:	'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'
> Subject:	Re: ssh after upgrade to 4.2
> 
> Lisa Goulet wrote:
> > 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I've upgraded to 4.2 and since then the ssh(default one) shows the
> error:
> > 
> > Feb  2 14:15:29 testbsd sshd[414]: no modules loaded for `sshd' service
> > Feb  2 14:15:29 testbsd sshd[414]: fatal: PAM session setup failed[6]:
> > Permission denied
> > Feb  2 14:15:29 testbsd sshd[414]: no modules loaded for `sshd' service
> > 
> > How can I fix this?  I would like to keep the changes to a minimum as
> these
> > are production servers.
> > 
> Did you run mergemaster after your upgrade?  Because that would have
> given you the option to update /etc/pam.conf.
> 
> Jim
> -- 
> /"\   ASCII Ribbon Campaign  .
> \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail  .
>  X  - NO Word docs in e-mail .
> / \ -----------------------------------------------------------------
> jeh@FreeBSD.org      http://www.FreeBSD.org     The Power to Serve
> jim@TheHousleys.Net  http://www.TheHousleys.net
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me in your ~/.signature
> to help me spread!             <- Save this lifeform ;-)
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2  7: 6:47 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from xs4some.net (CC4140-a.sneek1.fr.nl.home.com [212.120.108.75])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA09737B491
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 07:06:29 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from fenix@localhost)
	by xs4some.net (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f12F6D901207
	for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 16:06:13 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from fenix)
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 16:06:13 +0100 (CET)
From: User Fenix <fenix@xs4some.net>
Message-Id: <200102021506.f12F6D901207@xs4some.net>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: kde2
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hi
I was wondering if anyone knows what is the most painless way to install the latest stable kde2 release 
Right now i fetched the kde2 packages but i get a lot of dependency problems
and i can't find some of the packages like uulib-0.5.13 or tetex-1.-7
Anyway i use pkg_add -f so the packages are installed anyway ... will this give me problems ? Is there other any other way to solve this without compiling the whole kde ?
thx in Advance Fenix


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2  7:25:57 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5202037B491
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 07:25:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from walton.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP
          id <aa11034@salmon>; 2 Feb 2001 15:25:38 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 15:25:37 +0000
From: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie>
To: Shawn Barnhart <swb@grasslake.net>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: syslog.conf host selection uses only short host name?
Message-ID: <20010202152537.A51543@walton.maths.tcd.ie>
References: <020b01c08d21$4544fc40$b8209fc0@marlowe>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <020b01c08d21$4544fc40$b8209fc0@marlowe>; from swb@grasslake.net on Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 08:05:59AM -0600
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 08:05:59AM -0600, Shawn Barnhart wrote:

> I do.  It strikes me that I should be able to select on the fqdn.  The
> manpage says "hostname", which I've always assumed to be the fqdn.  The
> default output of hostname(1) on my 4.2-STABLE machines is the fqdn.

The matching is done on the hostname, exactly as it shows up in
the log messages produced by syslogd. Maybe "hostname tag" would
be a better desctiption. When generating the hostname tag it uses
the FQND if the domain's don't match or the short name if the
domains match. If you turn off resolving with the "-n" option
you can use IP addresses.

	David.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2  7:53:40 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from trsbs.third-rail.net (footrest.third-rail.net [63.175.99.10])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id BBD8637B4EC; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 07:53:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: by TRSBS with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
	id <DSQQ5LFP>; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 10:54:53 -0500
Message-ID: <4FC7AFEB1135D41199260000F87A88260D9530@TRSBS>
From: Chris Williams <Chris.Williams@third-rail.net>
To: "'freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>,
	"'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject: Have root on vinum, one small problem..
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 10:54:51 -0500 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


I've set up a server to load an MFS root off of a small slice at the beginning of my disks, and then start vinum and mount my real (vinumed) root slice over top of the MFS root. This allows me to boot off mirrored drives and not have my root go away if the drive I booted from dies. The only real hitch I encountered setting this up was that I had to hack mount(8) to not always treat a root mount as an update -- thus allowing me to overrun an existing root mount.

Things seems to be working quite well, but there is one strange behavior which worries me; whenever I shut down, right after syncing I get a panic:

panic: Vrele: negative ref cnt

I assume this has to do with the fact that the shutdown procedures are not expecting to have to unmount two root slices. So, I have two questions:

1) Would anybody who is already familiar with what's going on here be willing to generate a fix for this? It's kind of annoying since it prevents me from halting without rebooting, and I imagine it's a trivial fix -- I just wouldn't know where in the code to start looking, so it would take me a while.

2) Are there any other negative consequences of mounting over /? There was a very specific line in mount.c to prevent this from being done -- was that just to prevent accidentally doing something stupid, or is there a good reason this is a bad idea?

Thanks for any help..

PS -- if anyone out there needs help duplicating this config, feel free to drop me an e-mail. I couldn't find any documentation of the type of procedure I used, although it was suggested as a possible solution in the vinum "most requested features" list..



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2  8: 3:47 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP
	id 1030037B699; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 08:03:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from walton.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP
          id <aa24556@salmon>; 2 Feb 2001 16:03:26 +0000 (GMT)
To: Chris Williams <Chris.Williams@third-rail.net>
Cc: "'freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>,
	"'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>,
	iedowse@maths.tcd.ie
Subject: Re: Have root on vinum, one small problem.. 
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 02 Feb 2001 10:54:51 EST."
             <4FC7AFEB1135D41199260000F87A88260D9530@TRSBS> 
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 16:03:26 +0000
From: Ian Dowse <iedowse@maths.tcd.ie>
Message-ID:  <200102021603.aa24556@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In message <4FC7AFEB1135D41199260000F87A88260D9530@TRSBS>, Chris Williams write
s:
>
>Things seems to be working quite well, but there is one strange behavior which
> worries me; whenever I shut down, right after syncing I get a panic:
>
>panic: Vrele: negative ref cnt

I noticed this a while ago - it is due to inconsistent handling of
'rootvnode' in the kernel. You should find the details if you search
for 'rootvnode' in the -hackers archive.

The following patch should work around the panic by adding an extra
vnode reference for rootvp:

Ian

Index: init_main.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /FreeBSD/FreeBSD-CVS/src/sys/kern/init_main.c,v
retrieving revision 1.134.2.3
diff -u -r1.134.2.3 init_main.c
--- init_main.c	2000/09/07 19:13:36	1.134.2.3
+++ init_main.c	2001/02/02 16:01:52
@@ -456,6 +456,7 @@
 	VREF(fdp->fd_fd.fd_cdir);
 	VOP_UNLOCK(rootvnode, 0, &proc0);
 	fdp->fd_fd.fd_rdir = rootvnode;
+	VREF(fdp->fd_fd.fd_rdir);
 }
 SYSINIT(retrofit, SI_SUB_ROOT_FDTAB, SI_ORDER_FIRST, xxx_vfs_root_fdtab, NULL)



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2  8:18:35 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from ender.nonstop.net.il (webedge.nonstop.net.il [213.57.71.5])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7795337B69B; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 08:18:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alchemy.oven.org ([213.57.98.15]) by ender.nonstop.net.il
          (InterMail vK.4.03.01.00 201-232-122 **** LICENSE INVALID ****)
          with ESMTP id <20010202162519.ILYL4137.ender@alchemy.oven.org>;
          Fri, 2 Feb 2001 18:25:19 +0200
Received: (from mapc@localhost)
	by alchemy.oven.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f12GHPb82043;
	Fri, 2 Feb 2001 18:17:25 +0200 (IST)
	(envelope-from mapc)
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 18:17:23 +0200
From: Roman Shterenzon <roman@xpert.com>
To: jkh@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: [PATCH for review] Add verify checksum functionality to pkg_info
Message-ID: <20010202181722.A82035@alchemy.oven.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


--n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

Hi,
Can you please review this patch, thanks.

--Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant
[ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ]

--n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="pkg_info.diff"

diff -urN /usr/src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/info/info.h pkg_install/info/info.h
--- /usr/src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/info/info.h	Wed Nov  1 23:18:35 2000
+++ pkg_install/info/info.h	Fri Feb  2 16:32:32 2001
@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@
 #define SHOW_MTREE	0x0800
 #define SHOW_SIZE	0x1000
 #define SHOW_ORIGIN	0x2000
+#define SHOW_CKSUM	0x4000
 
 extern int Flags;
 extern Boolean AllInstalled;
diff -urN /usr/src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/info/main.c pkg_install/info/main.c
--- /usr/src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/info/main.c	Sun Dec 10 14:44:37 2000
+++ pkg_install/info/main.c	Fri Feb  2 16:32:37 2001
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
   "$FreeBSD: src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/info/main.c,v 1.22.2.5 2000/12/05 11:03:20 sobomax Exp $";
 #endif
 
-static char Options[] = "acdDe:fhiIkl:LmopqrRst:v";
+static char Options[] = "acdDe:fghiIkl:LmopqrRst:v";
 
 int	Flags		= 0;
 Boolean AllInstalled	= FALSE;
@@ -86,6 +86,10 @@
 
 	case 'f':
 	    Flags |= SHOW_PLIST;
+	    break;
+
+	case 'g':
+	    Flags |= SHOW_CKSUM;
 	    break;
 
 	case 'i':
diff -urN /usr/src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/info/perform.c pkg_install/info/perform.c
--- /usr/src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/info/perform.c	Wed Nov  1 23:18:35 2000
+++ pkg_install/info/perform.c	Fri Feb  2 16:32:27 2001
@@ -205,6 +205,8 @@
 	    show_files("Files:\n", &plist);
 	if ((Flags & SHOW_SIZE) && installed)
 	    show_size("Package Size:\n", &plist);
+	if ((Flags & SHOW_CKSUM) && installed)
+	    show_cksum("Mismatched Checksums:\n", &plist);
 	if (Flags & SHOW_ORIGIN)
 	    show_origin("Origin:\n", &plist);
 	if (!Quiet)
diff -urN /usr/src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/info/pkg_info.1 pkg_install/info/pkg_info.1
--- /usr/src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/info/pkg_info.1	Thu Dec 28 23:54:17 2000
+++ pkg_install/info/pkg_info.1	Fri Feb  2 17:13:37 2001
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
 .Nd a utility for displaying information on software packages
 .Sh SYNOPSIS
 .Nm
-.Op Fl cdDfiIkLmopqrRsv
+.Op Fl cdDfgiIkLmopqrRsv
 .Op Fl e Ar package
 .Op Fl l Ar prefix
 .Op Fl t Ar template
@@ -69,6 +69,8 @@
 Show the install-message file for each package.
 .It Fl f
 Show the packing list instructions for each package.
+.It Fl g
+Show files that don't match the recorded checksum.
 .It Fl i
 Show the install script (if any) for each package.
 .It Fl I
diff -urN /usr/src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/info/show.c pkg_install/info/show.c
--- /usr/src/usr.sbin/pkg_install/info/show.c	Wed Nov  1 23:18:35 2000
+++ pkg_install/info/show.c	Fri Feb  2 17:10:24 2001
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
 #include <stdlib.h>
 #include <sys/types.h>
 #include <sys/stat.h>
+#include <md5.h>
 
 void
 show_file(char *title, char *fname)
@@ -255,6 +256,35 @@
 	printf("%lu\t(%s)\n", howmany(size, blksize), descr);
     else
 	printf("%lu\n", size);
+}
+
+/* Show files that don't match the recorded checksum */
+void
+show_cksum(char *title, Package *plist)
+{
+    PackingList p;
+    char *dir = ".";
+    char tmp[FILENAME_MAX];
+
+    if (!Quiet)
+	printf("%s%s", InfoPrefix, title);
+
+    for (p = plist->head; p != NULL; p = p->next)
+	if (p->type == PLIST_CWD) 
+	    dir = p->name;
+	else if (p->type == PLIST_FILE) {
+	    snprintf(tmp, FILENAME_MAX, "%s/%s", dir, p->name);
+	    if (!fexists(tmp))
+		warnx("%s doesn't exist\n", tmp);
+	    else if (p->next && p->next->type == PLIST_COMMENT && !strncmp(p->next->name, "MD5:", 4)) {
+		char *cp, buf[33];
+		if ((cp = MD5File(tmp, buf)) != NULL)
+		    if (strcmp(cp, p->next->name + 4))
+			printf("%s fails the original MD5 checksum\n", tmp);
+		    else if (Verbose)
+			printf("%s matched the original MD5 checksum\n", tmp);
+	    }
+	}
 }
 
 /* Show an "origin" path (usually category/portname) */

--n8g4imXOkfNTN/H1--


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2  9: 2:41 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from veldy.net (w028.z064001117.msp-mn.dsl.cnc.net [64.1.117.28])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BA8937B4EC
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 09:02:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: from HP2500B (veldy.net [64.1.117.28])
	by veldy.net (Postfix) with SMTP id E9BED8C2C
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 11:01:42 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <006801c08d39$6974f9e0$3028680a@tgt.com>
From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net>
To: <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject: Bridge and IPFW woes ...
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 10:58:48 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

I have stumbled onto a problem with the bridging code (options BRIDGE) with
IPFIREWALL.  Please review my beautiful ASCII art below.

           Internet
              |
          ----------
          | Host A |
          ----------
              |
              | 24.2.0.1
             / \
            /   \
           /     \
          /       \
24.2.0.1 |         | 24.2.0.2
         |         |
 ----------     ----------
 | Host B |     | Host C |
 ----------     ----------

In this case, Host A has two NICS.  The external interface is not assigned
an IP address but th internal interface is assigned 24.2.0.1 (example IP
only).  Host A is running the in kernel bridging code so that Host B and
Host C can have public IP addresses instead of using NAT.  Host A also is a
firewall that protects itself and Host B and C.

The problem rears its ugly head when I start with both Host B and Host C
down.  If I start Host B first.  All is well, it can communicate with the
Internet and with Host A.  If I then start Host C, all becomes "unwell".
Both Host B and C can still communicate with the Internet, but they can not
communicate with Host A.  Most often the rest of the net can not communicate
with Host A either.  isc-dhcpd is running on Host A and it assigns IP
addresses to Hosts B and C.  Thus, I need the public IP address for Host A
assigned to the internal NIC (?).  Why would Host A suddenly drop of the
face of the earth when Host C comes up and yet bridging still functions
normally for access to the Internet???  Adding 'ipfw add 1 pass  all from
any to any' to Host A has not opened up access to Host A.  So something more
sinister is at work here.

If I change the bridging code over to NETGRAPH - this scenario does not
happen.  All communication works just fine between all the hosts and the
Internet, however, all firewall rules that would apply to Host B and C seem
to quit working.  In other words - all the hosts, except for Host A, are
left completely unprotected.  I have tried using IPFILTER with both the in
kernel bridging code and NETGRAPH and have come to the same conclusion.
There is no way to filter the bridged packets.

So, I have a dilemna.  How do I get bridging to work and yet firewall the
bridged packets - and still keep Host A on the Internet?

I am aware that bridging was not originally intended to bridge across
interfaces that themselves have IP addresses - yet this seems to be a common
thing.  The new bridging code in Linux was designed to do just that - but I
would prefer not to have to play with that on my production machine.

The closest I have come to a solution currently is to use ipfilter with
ipnat and bimap to simulate the same thing.  But it isn't the same thing.  I
really do need public access to these IP addresses and I need them
firewalled in route to the Internet.

Would Proxy ARP subnetting accomplish the same thing?  Can I do this on
FreeBSD with any ease?

Can anybody help me with this?

Thanks for reading this far :)

Thanks in advance for any assistance,

Tom Veldhouse
veldy@veldy.net




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2  9: 7:49 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from veldy.net (w028.z064001117.msp-mn.dsl.cnc.net [64.1.117.28])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A605937B401
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 09:07:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from HP2500B (veldy.net [64.1.117.28])
	by veldy.net (Postfix) with SMTP
	id 5FB888C2C; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 11:06:59 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <008301c08d3a$26cea3b0$3028680a@tgt.com>
From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net>
To: "David Wolfskill" <dhw@whistle.com>
Cc: <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
References: <200102021705.f12H5oh07324@pau-amma.whistle.com>
Subject: Re: Bridge and IPFW woes ...
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 11:04:04 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

No, sorry.

Host A 24.2.0.1
Host B 24.2.0.2
Host C 24.2.0.3

Tom Veldhouse
veldy@veldy.net

----- Original Message -----
From: "David Wolfskill" <dhw@whistle.com>
To: <veldy@veldy.net>
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 11:05 AM
Subject: Re: Bridge and IPFW woes ...


> >From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net>
> >Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 10:58:48 -0600
>
> >I have stumbled onto a problem with the bridging code (options BRIDGE)
with
> >IPFIREWALL.  Please review my beautiful ASCII art below.
>
> >           Internet
> >              |
> >          ----------
> >          | Host A |
> >          ----------
> >              |
> >              | 24.2.0.1
> >             / \
> >            /   \
> >           /     \
> >          /       \
> >24.2.0.1 |         | 24.2.0.2
> >         |         |
> > ----------     ----------
> > | Host B |     | Host C |
> > ----------     ----------
>
> Did you intend for the IP address for host B to be the same as the
> internal one for host A...?
>
> Cheers,
> david
> --
> David Wolfskill      dhw@whistle.com   UNIX System Administrator
> Desk: 650/577-7158   TIE: 8/499-7158   Cell: 650/759-0823
>



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2  9:25:13 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from smtp.smed.com (unknown [64.46.248.11])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D9637B6A7
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 09:24:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpgate.shrmed.com (unknown [64.46.248.1])
	by smtp.smed.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C09B1619E
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 12:24:53 -0500 (EST)
Received: from iesa14.shrmed.com (iesa14.shrmed.com [10.1.99.114])
	by smtpgate.shrmed.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA00805
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 12:24:13 -0500
From: Joe.Warner@smed.com
Received: from Deimos.smed.com (unverified) by iesa14.shrmed.com
 (Content Technologies SMTPRS 2.0.15) with SMTP id <B0001867396@iesa14.shrmed.com> for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>;
 Fri, 02 Feb 2001 12:23:57 -0500
Received: by Deimos.smed.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5  (863.2 5-20-1999))  id 852569E7.005F489E ; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 12:20:45 -0500
X-Lotus-FromDomain: SMS
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Message-Id: <852569E7.005F468C.00@Deimos.smed.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 10:24:27 -0700
Subject: Going from 4.2 -RELEASE to 4.2 -STABLE: "make buildkernel" fails
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG




Hi,

I tried searching the archive of this list before
posting but couldn't find any information similar
to the problem I'm now facing.

I had just installed FreeBSD 4.2 RELEASE on my
home PC and had CVSUP'd my ports and then
the source for STABLE.

Everything seemed to go fine with "make world"
and "mergemaster" but when I got to:

"make buildkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL"

It fails with an error that goes something like:

"Error line # 65 in config.  Devices can't use identity of 0....."

I am using a custom kernel, not GENERIC, that I've
recompiled a few times before attempting the move
to STABLE.

I looked at line # 65 of my kernel and also the GENERIC
kernel and it's just the "device   pcm" line.

I don't know how to fix this.  Can someone help me?

Thanks

Joe




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2 11: 6:34 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.oregonfast.net (mail.oregonfast.net [63.228.228.11])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8407C37B491
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 11:06:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 26922 invoked by uid 89); 2 Feb 2001 19:06:13 -0000
Message-ID: <20010202190613.26921.qmail@mail.oregonfast.net>
References: <20010202052101.97419.qmail@mail.oregonfast.net>
            <20010202053817.98631.qmail@mail.oregonfast.net>
In-Reply-To: <20010202053817.98631.qmail@mail.oregonfast.net> 
From: "Dan Langille" <dan@evilcode.com>
To: "James" <daemus@oregonfast.net>
Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: panic: ufs_dirbad: bad dir
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 19:06:13 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Sender: dan@evilcode.com
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

James writes:

> You might also wanna try installing the same /kernel and /modules that you 
> were when it panic'd, while you have the drive mounted on another box. 

That's a point.  I'll try that now. 

BTW: Someone sent me this: 

http://freebsd.sinica.edu.tw/pipermail/freebsd-taiwan-questions/2000-Novembe 
r/000066.html 

But I can't read that langauge...


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2 11: 6:45 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from femail8.sdc1.sfba.home.com (femail8.sdc1.sfba.home.com [24.0.95.88])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 584AC37B503
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 11:06:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from arem.glou1.nj.home.com ([24.12.109.14])
          by femail8.sdc1.sfba.home.com
          (InterMail vM.4.01.03.00 201-229-121) with ESMTP
          id <20010202190622.NTNX26894.femail8.sdc1.sfba.home.com@arem.glou1.nj.home.com>
          for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 11:06:22 -0800
Received: by arem.glou1.nj.home.com (Postfix, from userid 1001)
	id 6DC01356; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 14:19:59 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 14:19:59 -0500
From: jbw <jbwalters@alum.syracuse.edu>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: make install fails
Message-ID: <20010202141959.B8237@home.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

I have a 4.0-Release box that I'm upgrading to -Stable.  I compiled the kernel
, everything went fine. I then tried to to a make install but instead I
received the following message

host # make install
chflags noschg /kernel
chflags: /kernel: Operation not permitted
*** Error code 1 (ignored)
mv /kernel /kernel.old
mv: rename /kernel to /kernel.old: Operation not permitted
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src/sys/compile/HOST

What am I doing wrong?

thanks,

jbw


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2 11:11:22 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from secure.webhotel.net (secure.webhotel.net [195.41.202.80])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B82DF37B4EC
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 11:10:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 64454138 invoked from network); 2 Feb 2001 19:13:13 -0000
Received: from mail-gateway.webhotel.net (195.41.202.215)
  by mail.webhotel.net with SMTP; 2 Feb 2001 19:13:13 -0000
X-Authenticated-Timestamp: 20:13:13(CET) on February 02, 2001
Received: (from hroi@localhost)
	by chewbacca.netgroup.dk (8.11.1/8.9.3) id f12JAxJ83438;
	Fri, 2 Feb 2001 20:10:59 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from hroi)
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 20:10:59 +0100
From: Hroi Sigurdsson <hroi@netgroup.dk>
To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Bridge and IPFW woes ...
Message-ID: <20010202201059.A48414@chewbacca.netgroup.dk>
References: <006801c08d39$6974f9e0$3028680a@tgt.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <006801c08d39$6974f9e0$3028680a@tgt.com>; from veldy@veldy.net on Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 10:58:48AM -0600
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 10:58:48AM -0600, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote:

> If I change the bridging code over to NETGRAPH - this scenario does not
> happen.  All communication works just fine between all the hosts and the
> Internet, however, all firewall rules that would apply to Host B and C seem
> to quit working.  In other words - all the hosts, except for Host A, are
> left completely unprotected.  I have tried using IPFILTER with both the in
> kernel bridging code and NETGRAPH and have come to the same conclusion.
> There is no way to filter the bridged packets.

Netgraph doesn't support ipfw. It is in the TODO and look at this
from sys/netgraph/ng_bridge.c:

 /* Run packet through ipfw processing, if enabled */
 if (priv->conf.ipfw[linkNum] && fw_enable && ip_fw_chk_ptr != NULL) {
  	/* XXX not implemented yet */
 }

It would be really nice to have code in there instead of that comment
or a seperate ipfw netgraph node altogether :-)
I've been reading through some of the netgraph code and it is a
beautiful thing to behold.

-- 
Hroi Sigurdsson                             hroi@netgroup.dk
Netgroup A/S                          http://www.netgroup.dk


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2 11:19:11 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from awww.jeah.net (awww.jeah.net [216.111.239.130])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAD8E37B65D
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 11:18:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (chris@localhost)
	by awww.jeah.net (8.11.1/8.11.0) with ESMTP id f12JHub26372;
	Fri, 2 Feb 2001 13:17:56 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from chris@JEAH.net)
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 13:17:56 -0600 (CST)
From: Chris Byrnes <chris@JEAH.net>
To: jbw <jbwalters@alum.syracuse.edu>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: make install fails
In-Reply-To: <20010202141959.B8237@home.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0102021317370.26172-100000@awww.jeah.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

cd /usr/src ; make buildkernel KERNEL=YOURKERNELNAMEHERE
cd /usr/src ; make installkernel KERNEL=YOURKERNELNAMEHERE
reboot


Chris Byrnes
JEAH Communications
(Direct) 608-256-6167
(Toll-Free) 866-299-5324
http://www.JEAH.net

On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, jbw wrote:

> I have a 4.0-Release box that I'm upgrading to -Stable.  I compiled the kernel
> , everything went fine. I then tried to to a make install but instead I
> received the following message
> 
> host # make install
> chflags noschg /kernel
> chflags: /kernel: Operation not permitted
> *** Error code 1 (ignored)
> mv /kernel /kernel.old
> mv: rename /kernel to /kernel.old: Operation not permitted
> *** Error code 1
> Stop in /usr/src/sys/compile/HOST
> 
> What am I doing wrong?
> 
> thanks,
> 
> jbw
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
> 



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2 11:21:44 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from peitho.fxp.org (peitho.fxp.org [209.26.95.40])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2404437B65D
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 11:21:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: by peitho.fxp.org (Postfix, from userid 1501)
	id 4E4E213614; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 14:21:23 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 14:21:23 -0500
From: Chris Faulhaber <jedgar@fxp.org>
To: jbw <jbwalters@alum.syracuse.edu>
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: make install fails
Message-ID: <20010202142123.A71397@peitho.fxp.org>
Mail-Followup-To: Chris Faulhaber <jedgar@fxp.org>,
	jbw <jbwalters@alum.syracuse.edu>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
References: <20010202141959.B8237@home.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20010202141959.B8237@home.com>; from jbwalters@alum.syracuse.edu on Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 02:19:59PM -0500
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 02:19:59PM -0500, jbw wrote:
> I have a 4.0-Release box that I'm upgrading to -Stable.  I compiled the kernel
> , everything went fine. I then tried to to a make install but instead I
> received the following message
> 
> host # make install
> chflags noschg /kernel
> chflags: /kernel: Operation not permitted
> *** Error code 1 (ignored)
> mv /kernel /kernel.old
> mv: rename /kernel to /kernel.old: Operation not permitted
> *** Error code 1
> Stop in /usr/src/sys/compile/HOST
> 

Is your securelevel > 0 ?

-- 
Chris D. Faulhaber - jedgar@fxp.org - jedgar@FreeBSD.org
--------------------------------------------------------
FreeBSD: The Power To Serve   -   http://www.FreeBSD.org


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2 11:23:22 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from hex.databits.net (hex.databits.net [207.29.192.16])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7DF2337B684
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 11:23:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 9243 invoked by uid 1001); 2 Feb 2001 19:22:56 -0000
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 14:22:56 -0500
From: Pete Fritchman <petef@databits.net>
To: jbw <jbwalters@alum.syracuse.edu>
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: make install fails
Message-ID: <20010202142256.C7669@databits.net>
References: <20010202141959.B8237@home.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20010202141959.B8237@home.com>; from jbwalters@alum.syracuse.edu on Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 02:19:59PM -0500
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

++ 02/02/01 14:19 -0500 - jbw:
>I have a 4.0-Release box that I'm upgrading to -Stable.  I compiled the kernel
>, everything went fine. I then tried to to a make install but instead I
>received the following message
>
>host # make install
>chflags noschg /kernel
>chflags: /kernel: Operation not permitted

Type "sysctl kern.securelevel".  I'd bet it's >= 1, which means you can't
modify schg files (see the chflags(1) man page for info on schg).  You'll
need to either drop into single user mode ("shutdown now" on the console,
or boot -s during boot up), or modify /etc/rc.conf to drop the securelevel
to -1, reboot, then install your kernel (and then up securelevel again, if
desired).

>
[...]
>

-pete

--
Pete Fritchman <petef@databits.net>
Databits Network Services, Inc. <http://databits.net>
finger petef@databits.net for PGP key



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2 11:34:17 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from relay3.inwind.it (relay3.inwind.it [212.141.53.74])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80B6137B4EC
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 11:33:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bartequi.ottodomain.org (62.98.162.178) by relay3.inwind.it (5.1.056)
        id 3A40BF86009722C2; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 20:33:50 +0100
From: Salvo Bartolotta <bartequi@inwind.it>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 19:36:45 GMT
Message-ID: <20010202.19364500@bartequi.ottodomain.org>
Subject: Re: Going from 4.2 -RELEASE to 4.2 -STABLE: "make buildkernel" fails
To: Joe.Warner@smed.com
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <852569E7.005F468C.00@Deimos.smed.com>
References: <852569E7.005F468C.00@Deimos.smed.com>
X-Mailer: SuperCalifragilis
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<

On 2/2/01, 6:24:27 PM, Joe.Warner@smed.com wrote regarding Going from=20
4.2 -RELEASE to 4.2 -STABLE: "make buildkernel" fails:


> Hi,

> I tried searching the archive of this list before
> posting but couldn't find any information similar
> to the problem I'm now facing.

> I had just installed FreeBSD 4.2 RELEASE on my
> home PC and had CVSUP'd my ports and then
> the source for STABLE.
                 ^^^^^^^
                 ^^^^^^^ =20

> Everything seemed to go fine with "make world"
> and "mergemaster" but when I got to:

> "make buildkernel KERNCONF=3DMYKERNEL"
                    ^^^^^^^^    =20
                    ^^^^^^^^


You should be using KERNEL instead of KERNCONF, shouldn't you ?

If you want to use KERNCONF, you will have to cvsup -CURRENT sources.=20
However, -CURRENT is NOT for ordinary users. You have beeen warned :-)

HTH,
Salvo





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2 11:44: 2 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from yertle.kciLink.com (yertle.kciLink.com [208.184.13.195])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6630A37B4EC
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 11:43:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from onceler.kciLink.com (onceler.kciLink.com [208.184.13.196])
	by yertle.kciLink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88B3D2E45E
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 14:43:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from khera@localhost)
	by onceler.kciLink.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f12Jhg668201;
	Fri, 2 Feb 2001 14:43:42 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from khera)
From: Vivek Khera <khera@kciLink.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <14971.3566.337385.728418@onceler.kciLink.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 14:43:42 -0500
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: make install fails
In-Reply-To: <20010202142256.C7669@databits.net>
References: <20010202141959.B8237@home.com>
	<20010202142256.C7669@databits.net>
X-Mailer: VM 6.90 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>>>>> "PF" == Pete Fritchman <petef@databits.net> writes:

PF> Type "sysctl kern.securelevel".  I'd bet it's >= 1, which means you can't
PF> modify schg files (see the chflags(1) man page for info on schg).  You'll
PF> need to either drop into single user mode ("shutdown now" on the console,

You need to boot -s on the console; dropping to single user mode does
not clear kern.securelevel.  You must reboot.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2 11:57:32 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from shepherd.hurlburt.af.mil (shepherd.hurlburt.af.mil [151.166.15.65])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 417F137B401
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 11:57:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from shepherd.hurlburt.af.mil (root@localhost)
	by shepherd.hurlburt.af.mil with ESMTP id NAA06213;
	Fri, 2 Feb 2001 13:56:41 -0600 (CST)
From: Andrew.Hodgkins@hurlburt.af.mil
Received: from exwncc02.hurlburt.af.mil (exwncc02.hurlburt.af.mil [151.166.208.36])
	by shepherd.hurlburt.af.mil with ESMTP id NAA06208;
	Fri, 2 Feb 2001 13:56:41 -0600 (CST)
Received: by EXWNCC02 with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
	id <D8NBYYCT>; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 13:56:37 -0600
Message-ID: <B5055445D778D31189CA0020484037D001B684DD@vexwrst02.hurlburt.af.mil>
To: Joe.Warner@smed.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: RE: Going from 4.2 -RELEASE to 4.2 -STABLE: "make buildkernel" fa
	ils
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 13:56:48 -0600 
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Well, the proper syntax is "make buildkernel KERNEL=MYKERNEL".  KERNCONF is
the new variable name for CURRENT, but STABLE still uses KERNEL.

If you still get an error, though, double-check for typos (extra/missing
comment character, etc.) that may not necessarily be on line 65.  Use "diff"
to compare it with a known good kernel config file.  If you still can't find
anything wrong, just start over and make your edits on the most recent
GENERIC.  ;)  I generally do this whenever GENERIC has changed since my last
kernel build anyway.

HTH,
Andy

-----Original Message-----
From: Joe.Warner@smed.com [mailto:Joe.Warner@smed.com]
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 11:24 AM
To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Going from 4.2 -RELEASE to 4.2 -STABLE: "make buildkernel"
fails





Hi,

I tried searching the archive of this list before
posting but couldn't find any information similar
to the problem I'm now facing.

I had just installed FreeBSD 4.2 RELEASE on my
home PC and had CVSUP'd my ports and then
the source for STABLE.

Everything seemed to go fine with "make world"
and "mergemaster" but when I got to:

"make buildkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL"

It fails with an error that goes something like:

"Error line # 65 in config.  Devices can't use identity of 0....."

I am using a custom kernel, not GENERIC, that I've
recompiled a few times before attempting the move
to STABLE.

I looked at line # 65 of my kernel and also the GENERIC
kernel and it's just the "device   pcm" line.

I don't know how to fix this.  Can someone help me?

Thanks

Joe




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2 12:17: 7 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from tzeench.dhs.org (h24-70-93-66.ed.shawcable.net [24.70.93.66])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3052D37B503
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 12:16:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (darren@localhost)
	by tzeench.dhs.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f12KGtt08277
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 13:16:56 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from darren@tzeench.dhs.org)
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 13:16:54 -0700 (MST)
From: Darren <darren@tzeench.dhs.org>
To: <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: glx hardware 3d acceleration
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.32.0102021313470.8270-100000@tzeench.dhs.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

alright well I installed graphics/utah-glx then I installed
/x11-clocks/glclock to test how it would use my hardware.  I have an
XENTOR32 RIVA TNT2 ULTRA.  anyways this is the output it gave me:

%glclock
glclcok-5.0, June 1999 by Masaki Kawase <masa@daionet.gr.jp>

GLUT: Fatal Error in glclock: OpenGL GLX extension not supported by
display: :0.0
%

also what other programs can I use to test OpenGL on my computer, I"m not
a huge quake fan.

-Darren



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2 12:18: 6 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from level3.dynacom.net (level3.dynacom.net [206.107.213.213])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4FEAB37B401
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 12:17:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 11060 invoked by uid 0); 2 Feb 2001 20:17:47 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO urx.com) (206.159.132.160)
  by mail.urx.com with SMTP; 2 Feb 2001 20:17:47 -0000
Message-ID: <3A7B15EA.D72608C@urx.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 12:17:46 -0800
From: Kent Stewart <kstewart@urx.com>
Reply-To: kstewart@urx.com
Organization: Dynacom
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Andrew.Hodgkins@hurlburt.af.mil
Cc: Joe.Warner@smed.com, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Going from 4.2 -RELEASE to 4.2 -STABLE: "make buildkernel" fails
References: <B5055445D778D31189CA0020484037D001B684DD@vexwrst02.hurlburt.af.mil>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG



Andrew.Hodgkins@hurlburt.af.mil wrote:
> 
> Well, the proper syntax is "make buildkernel KERNEL=MYKERNEL".  KERNCONF is
> the new variable name for CURRENT, but STABLE still uses KERNEL.

Not since 0833 GMT on 2 Feb. See
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/Makefile.inc1. The way I
read it, KERNCONF is the choice but KERNEL is still supposed to work
but with a warning.

Kent

> 
> If you still get an error, though, double-check for typos (extra/missing
> comment character, etc.) that may not necessarily be on line 65.  Use "diff"
> to compare it with a known good kernel config file.  If you still can't find
> anything wrong, just start over and make your edits on the most recent
> GENERIC.  ;)  I generally do this whenever GENERIC has changed since my last
> kernel build anyway.
> 
> HTH,
> Andy
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Joe.Warner@smed.com [mailto:Joe.Warner@smed.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 11:24 AM
> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
> Subject: Going from 4.2 -RELEASE to 4.2 -STABLE: "make buildkernel"
> fails
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I tried searching the archive of this list before
> posting but couldn't find any information similar
> to the problem I'm now facing.
> 
> I had just installed FreeBSD 4.2 RELEASE on my
> home PC and had CVSUP'd my ports and then
> the source for STABLE.
> 
> Everything seemed to go fine with "make world"
> and "mergemaster" but when I got to:
> 
> "make buildkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL"
> 
> It fails with an error that goes something like:
> 
> "Error line # 65 in config.  Devices can't use identity of 0....."
> 
> I am using a custom kernel, not GENERIC, that I've
> recompiled a few times before attempting the move
> to STABLE.
> 
> I looked at line # 65 of my kernel and also the GENERIC
> kernel and it's just the "device   pcm" line.
> 
> I don't know how to fix this.  Can someone help me?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Joe
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

-- 
Kent Stewart
Richland, WA

mailto:kbstew99@hotmail.com
http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/index.html
FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2 12:26:56 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from yertle.kciLink.com (yertle.kciLink.com [208.184.13.195])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EAB037B401
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 12:26:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from onceler.kciLink.com (onceler.kciLink.com [208.184.13.196])
	by yertle.kciLink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9E032E454
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 14:18:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from khera@localhost)
	by onceler.kciLink.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f12JItT10247;
	Fri, 2 Feb 2001 14:18:55 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from khera)
From: Vivek Khera <khera@kciLink.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <14971.2079.654915.526180@onceler.kciLink.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 14:18:55 -0500
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: make install fails
In-Reply-To: <20010202141959.B8237@home.com>
References: <20010202141959.B8237@home.com>
X-Mailer: VM 6.90 under 21.1 (patch 12) "Channel Islands" XEmacs Lucid
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

>>>>> "j" == jbw  <jbwalters@alum.syracuse.edu> writes:

j> host # make install
j> chflags noschg /kernel
j> chflags: /kernel: Operation not permitted

j> What am I doing wrong?

You need to reboot to single user mode first.  You're running with
kern.securelevel > 0, and that enforces the schg file system flag on
the /kernel file.  The *only* way to clear kern.securelevel is to
reboot and stay in single user mode.

-- 
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Vivek Khera, Ph.D.                Khera Communications, Inc.
Internet: khera@kciLink.com       Rockville, MD       +1-240-453-8497
AIM: vivekkhera Y!: vivek_khera   http://www.khera.org/~vivek/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2 12:27: 6 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from phobos.talarian.com (mailhost.talarian.com [207.5.32.17])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D078E37B491
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 12:26:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from quack.kfu.com (beast.talarian.com [10.4.10.6] (may be forged)) by phobos.talarian.com (8.9.0/8.9.0) with ESMTP id MAA23964; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 12:26:32 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <3A7B17EA.8030605@quack.kfu.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 12:26:18 -0800
From: Nick Sayer <nsayer@quack.kfu.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.2-RELEASE i386; en-US; 0.7) Gecko/20010123
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Dmitry G. Golub" <dgolub@gdg.perm.cbr.ru>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Strange behavior of USB and ulpt printer
References: <E14NSGB-000DtO-00@gdg.perm.cbr.ru>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Dmitry G. Golub wrote:

> 
> Because Canon's 6xxx series does not have hardware character generator,
> I am printing via Ghostscript only, but with same GS configuration printer
> works very well on LPT port. Have anybody any ideas? Have anybody any success
> with USB printers such as Canon 6100?
> 
> Sorry for my poor English. I hope you can understand me.
> 

I have one success story and one failure story.

I have an Epson Photo 870 that works perfectly with ulpt. Well, almost. 
The little program that lets you detect ink levels fails, since ulpt 
doesn't support a back channel. But printing is flawless. The only 
complaint I have is that the data set for printing a single page is HUGE 
on this printer, and ghostscript takes a long(er) time to chew over it. 
But the output is so beautiful I can't complain too much.

I used to have an HP DeskJet 812C. It didn't work -- it was prone to 
what was clearly buffer overruns within the printer. If I added delays 
to the ulpt driver, it worked, but then it printed extremely slowly. I 
figure the Windows driver must have some sort of workaround for this 
issue. But then lately HP has been going the 
undocumented-windows-only-*nix-users-can-go-suck-eggs route anyhow, so I 
really have no further use for them.



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2 12:36:39 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from obsecurity.org (adsl-64-169-104-72.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.169.104.72])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0EF837B401
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 12:36:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: by obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id AF373BA0CB; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 12:36:51 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 12:36:51 -0800
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: User Fenix <fenix@xs4some.net>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: kde2
Message-ID: <20010202123651.B84752@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <200102021506.f12F6D901207@xs4some.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UHN/qo2QbUvPLonB"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <200102021506.f12F6D901207@xs4some.net>; from fenix@xs4some.net on Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 04:06:13PM +0100
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


--UHN/qo2QbUvPLonB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 04:06:13PM +0100, User Fenix wrote:

> I was wondering if anyone knows what is the most painless way to
> install the latest stable kde2 release Right now i fetched the kde2
> packages but i get a lot of dependency problems and i can't find
> some of the packages like uulib-0.5.13 or tetex-1.-7 Anyway i use
> pkg_add -f so the packages are installed anyway ... will this give
> me problems ? Is there other any other way to solve this without
> compiling the whole kde ?

These packages are needed for various parts of KDE. If you don't
install them then something will not work - perhaps you won't ever
bump into it because you don't use that feature, but it is nonetheless
incomplete.

pkg_add -r will fetch the latest version of a package and all its
dependencies.

Kris

--UHN/qo2QbUvPLonB
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6expiWry0BWjoQKURAh54AKDWBLNdNrZdaap2hFAVkL64HLXohwCdG9py
t/iA5x3glbhfenyHaV5Kg9E=
=64qC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--UHN/qo2QbUvPLonB--


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2 12:39:32 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (winston.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.229])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id F419D37B401; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 12:39:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f12KcpP80426;
	Fri, 2 Feb 2001 12:38:52 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com)
To: Roman Shterenzon <roman@xpert.com>
Cc: jkh@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH for review] Add verify checksum functionality to pkg_info 
In-Reply-To: Message from Roman Shterenzon <roman@xpert.com> 
   of "Fri, 02 Feb 2001 18:17:23 +0200." <20010202181722.A82035@alchemy.oven.org> 
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 12:38:51 -0800
Message-ID: <80421.981146331@winston.osd.bsdi.com>
From: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Looks good to me, though there sure has been a proliferation of "show
flags".  If I had the chance to do it over, I'd go to multi-part option
flag names. :)

- Jordan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2 12:52:33 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from clmboh1-smtp3.columbus.rr.com (unknown [65.24.0.112])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1928B37B401
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 12:52:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.iowna.com (dhcp065-024-023-038.columbus.rr.com [65.24.23.38])
	by clmboh1-smtp3.columbus.rr.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) with ESMTP id f12Knlr27140
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 15:49:48 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <3A7B1D48.8FEC89F0@mail.iowna.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 15:49:12 -0500
From: Bill Moran <wmoran@mail.iowna.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.2-STABLE i386)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: NFS v3 broken? (or is it SGI's fault)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Anyone else seen this?
NFS connnection from and SGI box(client) to a FreeBSD box (server) will
fail when writing if the connection is done using v3 of NFS.
Using v2 works just dandy. Other operations seem to work just fine under
v3 (change perms, scan directories, read files)

Bug? SGI's fault? If more debugging info would be helpful I can provide
it. Just let me know how to get what you need.

This is using 4.2-STABLE from Jan 8.

-Bill


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2 13: 8: 1 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from fw.wintelcom.net (ns1.wintelcom.net [209.1.153.20])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67AE337B491
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 13:07:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from bright@localhost)
	by fw.wintelcom.net (8.10.0/8.10.0) id f12L7ej07515;
	Fri, 2 Feb 2001 13:07:40 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 13:07:40 -0800
From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@wintelcom.net>
To: Bill Moran <wmoran@mail.iowna.com>
Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: NFS v3 broken? (or is it SGI's fault)
Message-ID: <20010202130739.A26076@fw.wintelcom.net>
References: <3A7B1D48.8FEC89F0@mail.iowna.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <3A7B1D48.8FEC89F0@mail.iowna.com>; from wmoran@mail.iowna.com on Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 03:49:12PM -0500
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

* Bill Moran <wmoran@mail.iowna.com> [010202 12:53] wrote:
> Anyone else seen this?
> NFS connnection from and SGI box(client) to a FreeBSD box (server) will
> fail when writing if the connection is done using v3 of NFS.
> Using v2 works just dandy. Other operations seem to work just fine under
> v3 (change perms, scan directories, read files)
> 
> Bug? SGI's fault? If more debugging info would be helpful I can provide
> it. Just let me know how to get what you need.
> 
> This is using 4.2-STABLE from Jan 8.

Our lockd doesn't support NFSv3 locks, it's been on my TODO list for
over a year to bring in the patch to do it, just never had the time.

If you search the archives, look for Dan Nelson, he's got the patch
I did.

-- 
-Alfred Perlstein - [bright@wintelcom.net|alfred@freebsd.org]
"I have the heart of a child; I keep it in a jar on my desk."


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2 13:15:13 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from obsecurity.org (adsl-64-169-104-72.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.169.104.72])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDF9A37B401
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 13:14:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: by obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 2FAF5BA0CB; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 13:15:25 -0800 (PST)
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 13:15:25 -0800
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: "Alexandr A. Listopad" <laa@laa.zp.ua>
Cc: Yaresham Saaya <yaresham@arc.net.my>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: cvsup to 4.2-stable & ports problem
Message-ID: <20010202131525.B85476@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <3A7938AB.2C845652@arc.net.my> <20010201125645.A4171@laa.zp.ua>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uZ3hkaAS1mZxFaxD"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20010201125645.A4171@laa.zp.ua>; from laa@laa.zp.ua on Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 12:56:45PM +0200
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


--uZ3hkaAS1mZxFaxD
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 12:56:45PM +0200, Alexandr A. Listopad wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 06:21:31PM +0800, Yaresham Saaya wrote:
> > Hi everybody!
> >=20
> > I just cvsup my system from 4.1.1 to 4.2-stable.
> > Then I also cvsup my ports. But then I can't
> > install anything thru this new ports. This error message
> > appear.
> >=20
> > "Error: your port uses an old layout.  Please update it to match this
> > bsd.port.mk."
> >=20
> > How to solve this?
>=20
> what about ports-base in ports-supfile? and src-share in
> stable-supfile?

I think both of these answers so far are incorrect. Your cvsup has not
deleted some of the old files in your repo. See Q12 and Q13 in the
cvsup FAQ on www.polstra.com for why, and how to fix it.

Kris

--uZ3hkaAS1mZxFaxD
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6eyNsWry0BWjoQKURAqwDAJ499MGyFAinWulA4bdeYAoIwwDuagCfTFCH
iusrvvn0WUhg2/p+O7zMGJ4=
=TJu9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--uZ3hkaAS1mZxFaxD--


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2 13:31: 4 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at [128.130.111.12])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id DD07637B401; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 13:30:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from taygeta.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (taygeta [128.130.111.77])
	by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f12LUce14239;
	Fri, 2 Feb 2001 22:30:38 +0100 (MET)
Received: from localhost (pfeifer@localhost)
	by taygeta.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f12LUc015620;
	Fri, 2 Feb 2001 22:30:39 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at)
X-Authentication-Warning: taygeta.dbai.tuwien.ac.at: pfeifer owned process doing -bs
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 22:30:38 +0100 (CET)
From: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
To: <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>, <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject: AMD, pwd and WRKDIR
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.33.0102022219270.588-100000@taygeta.dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Some time before 4.2-RELEASE AMD has been updated to use /.amd_mnt instead
of /amd as mount-point.

Now, my ports collection resides in an automounted directory, and when I
set WRKDIR for the ports collection to /tmp, the ports build and install
fine, but /tmp remains ``empty'', as the port machinery takes the full
path as used by AMD and creates /tmp/.amd_mnt/fileserver/disk/dir/...

This is bad[TM], but I don't know how this should be fixed.


To -STABLE:  Ideally, `pwd` would return a *logical* path, that is,
  /amdtable/dir/... instead of /.amd_mnt/nfsserver/disk/dir, but I don't
  know whether this can be done.

To -PORTS:  At the very least, and short-term fix, I recommend
    `pwd` | sed -e s#^.amd_mnt/##
  or
    `pwd` | sed -e s#^.amd_mnt/fileserver##
  instead of of a plain `pwd` to determine the pathname under $WRKDIR.

Gerald
-- 
Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2 13:33:41 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (winston.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.229])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFE5D37B401
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 13:33:21 -0800 (PST)
Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f12LUbP80670;
	Fri, 2 Feb 2001 13:30:38 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com)
To: Darren <darren@tzeench.dhs.org>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: glx hardware 3d acceleration 
In-Reply-To: Message from Darren <darren@tzeench.dhs.org> 
   of "Fri, 02 Feb 2001 13:16:54 MST." <Pine.BSF.4.32.0102021313470.8270-100000@tzeench.dhs.org> 
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 13:30:37 -0800
Message-ID: <80666.981149437@winston.osd.bsdi.com>
From: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> alright well I installed graphics/utah-glx then I installed
> /x11-clocks/glclock to test how it would use my hardware.  I have an
> XENTOR32 RIVA TNT2 ULTRA.  anyways this is the output it gave me:

I'll bet you forgot to load the glx module from your XF86Config file
though.  It does no good installing a GLX module if you don't actually
load it into your server and verify that it's truly supported with
xdpyinfo first. :)

- Jordan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2 13:53:29 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from smtp.smed.com (unknown [64.46.248.11])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6906D37B491
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 13:53:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtpgate.shrmed.com (unknown [64.46.248.1])
	by smtp.smed.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D50D216201
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 16:53:10 -0500 (EST)
Received: from iesa14.shrmed.com (iesa14.shrmed.com [10.1.99.114])
	by smtpgate.shrmed.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA09652
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 16:52:31 -0500
From: Joe.Warner@smed.com
Received: from Deimos.smed.com (unverified) by iesa14.shrmed.com
 (Content Technologies SMTPRS 2.0.15) with SMTP id <B0001871128@iesa14.shrmed.com>;
 Fri, 02 Feb 2001 16:52:21 -0500
Received: by Deimos.smed.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5  (863.2 5-20-1999))  id 852569E7.0077DB7E ; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 16:49:09 -0500
X-Lotus-FromDomain: SMS
To: Andrew.Hodgkins@hurlburt.af.mil
Cc: kstewart@urx.com, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Message-Id: <852569E7.0077DAF2.00@Deimos.smed.com>
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 14:52:56 -0700
Subject: RE: Going from 4.2 -RELEASE to 4.2 -STABLE: "make buildkernel" fa
		ils
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG




Is there a copy of /usr/src/UPDATE from
FreeBSD 4.2 RELEASE that I could get off
of the web somewhere?

I just want a copy I can print out and take
home with me.

Thanks

Joe





To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2 13:58:53 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from level3.dynacom.net (level3.dynacom.net [206.107.213.213])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7355837B401
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 13:58:36 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 23878 invoked by uid 0); 2 Feb 2001 21:58:34 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO urx.com) (206.159.132.160)
  by mail.urx.com with SMTP; 2 Feb 2001 21:58:34 -0000
Message-ID: <3A7B2D8A.CD28F504@urx.com>
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 13:58:34 -0800
From: Kent Stewart <kstewart@urx.com>
Reply-To: kstewart@urx.com
Organization: Dynacom
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Joe.Warner@smed.com
Cc: Andrew.Hodgkins@hurlburt.af.mil, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Going from 4.2 -RELEASE to 4.2 -STABLE: "make buildkernel" fails
References: <852569E7.0077DAF2.00@Deimos.smed.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG



Joe.Warner@smed.com wrote:
> 
> Is there a copy of /usr/src/UPDATE from
> FreeBSD 4.2 RELEASE that I could get off
> of the web somewhere?
> 
> I just want a copy I can print out and take
> home with me.

You can always find the latest source on the cvsweb.cgi at
FreeBSD.org. For /usr/src/UPDATING look at
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/UPDATING. You are interested
in the RELENG_4 version. Just remember that the KERNCONF changes
haven't been added to UPDATING yet.

Kent

> 
> Thanks
> 
> Joe

-- 
Kent Stewart
Richland, WA

mailto:kbstew99@hotmail.com
http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/index.html
FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2 14:26:35 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (drugs.dv.isc.org [130.155.191.236])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE0037B401
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 14:26:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nominum.com (localhost.dv.isc.org [127.0.0.1])
	by drugs.dv.isc.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f12MQBN90485;
	Sat, 3 Feb 2001 09:26:14 +1100 (EST)
	(envelope-from marka@nominum.com)
Message-Id: <200102022226.f12MQBN90485@drugs.dv.isc.org>
To: Lisa Goulet <Lisa.Goulet@versatel.nl>
Cc: "'James Housley'" <jim@thehousleys.net>,
	"'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
From: Mark.Andrews@nominum.com
Subject: Re: ssh after upgrade to 4.2 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 02 Feb 2001 15:19:06 BST."
             <77A588078DF6D3118C0A00508B8E036703875812@AMSHQB-EXCH02> 
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 09:26:11 +1100
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


	You should also read /usr/src/UPDATING.

> Thanks all, mergemaster did the trick.
> 
> Regards,
> Lisa
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:	James Housley [SMTP:jim@thehousleys.net]
> > Sent:	Friday, February 02, 2001 2:42 PM
> > To:	Lisa Goulet
> > Cc:	'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'
> > Subject:	Re: ssh after upgrade to 4.2
> > 
> > Lisa Goulet wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > I've upgraded to 4.2 and since then the ssh(default one) shows the
> > error:
> > > 
> > > Feb  2 14:15:29 testbsd sshd[414]: no modules loaded for `sshd' service
> > > Feb  2 14:15:29 testbsd sshd[414]: fatal: PAM session setup failed[6]:
> > > Permission denied
> > > Feb  2 14:15:29 testbsd sshd[414]: no modules loaded for `sshd' service
> > > 
> > > How can I fix this?  I would like to keep the changes to a minimum as
> > these
> > > are production servers.
> > > 
> > Did you run mergemaster after your upgrade?  Because that would have
> > given you the option to update /etc/pam.conf.
> > 
> > Jim
> > -- 
> > /"\   ASCII Ribbon Campaign  .
> > \ / - NO HTML/RTF in e-mail  .
> >  X  - NO Word docs in e-mail .
> > / \ -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > jeh@FreeBSD.org      http://www.FreeBSD.org     The Power to Serve
> > jim@TheHousleys.Net  http://www.TheHousleys.net
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me in your ~/.signature
> > to help me spread!             <- Save this lifeform ;-)
> > 
> > 
> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
--
Mark Andrews, Nominum Inc.
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: Mark.Andrews@nominum.com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2 14:34:24 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from firebat.bushong.net (c128625-a.frmt1.sfba.home.com [24.176.225.90])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2734D37B401
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 14:34:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from dbushong@localhost)
	by firebat.bushong.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) id f12MWpq37377;
	Fri, 2 Feb 2001 14:32:51 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from dbushong)
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 14:32:51 -0800
From: David Bushong <david@bushong.net>
To: Darren <darren@tzeench.dhs.org>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: glx hardware 3d acceleration
Message-ID: <20010202143251.L16505@bushong.net>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.32.0102021313470.8270-100000@tzeench.dhs.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.32.0102021313470.8270-100000@tzeench.dhs.org>; from darren@tzeench.dhs.org on Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 01:16:54PM -0700
X-Floating-Sheep-Port: 0xbaa
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 01:16:54PM -0700, Darren wrote:
>
> ...
>
> also what other programs can I use to test OpenGL on my computer, I"m not
> a huge quake fan.
> 
> -Darren
> 
I think Jordan answered your main question, so I'll answer this one:

I always test GL apps using the various GL-enabled XScreensaver bits 
(/usr/ports/x11/xscreensaver), like "lament", "atlantis", "cage" and whatnot.

BTW, I have utah-glx working great for my TNT.. but I'm never buying another
nVidia again unless they amend their XFree86-hating ways.

--David Bushong


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2 14:50:38 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from gemma.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (gemma.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [129.70.136.103])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C80F437B491
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 14:50:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mime.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (mime.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [129.70.134.6])
	by gemma.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (8.9.1/8.9.1/TechFak/pk+ro20000427) with SMTP id XAA08292
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 23:50:15 +0100 (MET)
From: Oliver Schonefeld <oschonef@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
Received: by mime.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (SMI-8.6/pk19971205)
	id XAA10154; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 23:50:15 +0100
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 23:50:14 +0100
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: ahc eisa: disk probe fails -> kernel panic
Message-ID: <20010202235014.A10100@mime.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i
X-Zen: Oooommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hello!

With recent commits to the ahc driver the kernel survises the probing of the
adapter but when probing the drives I get some wierd SCSI debug stuff and a
kernel panic.

Hardware is a Compaq Prosignia 486, Adaptec 1740 (one SCSI streamer) and an
Adaptec 2742 (Twin Channel).
Channel A: 4x IBM DNES 9,1 GB + 2x IBM DCAS 4.3 GB
Channel B: 1x IBM DCAS 4.3 GB, 1x SCSI cdrom
Other Hardware. 2x 3Com 3c597 eisa NICs

Worked in the same hardware setup from 4.0-CURRENT to 4.2-RELEASE.
Current -STABLE is a no go, booting -RELEASE kernel works without any
problems. With -RELEASE, I even built world on that machine just 15 hours
ago, so I do not think this is a hardware or scsi terminaton/cabling issue.
World and Kernel have been built from sources as of 02.02.2001 23:00 CET

from dmesg:
ahb0: <Adaptec 174x SCSI host adapter> at 0x3c00-0x3ff, irq 14 (edge)
ahb0: on eisa0 slot 3
ahb0: AHA1740A Single Ended SCSI Adapter, FW Rev. E   , ID=7, 64 ECBs
ahc0: <Adaptec 274X SCSI adapter> at 0x7c00-0x7ff, irq 15 (edge)
ahc0: on eisa0 slot 7
aic7770: Twin Channel, A SCSI Id=7, B SCSI Id=7, primary B, 4/255 SCBs
[..]
ahb: SCSI Bus Reset Delivered
ahc:0:B:0 no active SC for reconnecting target - issuing BUS DEVICE RESET
SAVED_SCSID == 0x87, SAVED_LUN = 0x0, ARG_1 == 0xff ACCUM = 0x80
SEQ_FLAGS == 0x0, SCBPTR == 0x2, BTT == 0x8, SINDEX == 0x31
SCSIID == 0x17, SCB_SCSIID == 0x47, SCB_LUN = 0x0, SCB_TAG == 0x0,
	SCB_CONTROL == 0x44
SCSIBUSL == 0x13, SCSISIGI == 0x46
SXSFRCTL0 == 0x8
SEQCTL == 0x10
ahc: Dumping Card State at SEQADDR 0x19a
SCB Count = 20
Kernel NEXTQSCB = 1
Card NEXTQSCB = 1
QINFIFO entries:
Waiting Queue entries:
Disconnected Queue entries: 2:0 3:19 1:2 0:15
QOUTFIFO enries
Sequencer Free SCB List:
Pending list: 0 17 19 18 4 2 15 8
Kernel Free SCB list: 16 3 9 5 6 7 14 13 12 11 10
Untagged Q(0): 8 4
Untagged Q(1): 19 17
Untagged Q(2): 15
Untagged Q(3): 2
Untagged Q(4): 0
Untagged Q(5): 18
ahc0:B:0: Target did not send an IDENTITIY message. LASTPHASE = 0x40,
SAVED_SCSIID == 0x87
Inactive SCB in untaggedQ
ahc0: Issued Channel B Bus Reset. 2 SCBs aborted
ahc0: brkadrint, Illegal Host Access at seqaddr = 0x1
ahc0: Dumping Card State at SEQADDR 0x1
SCB count = 20
Kernel NEXTQSCB = 4
Card NEXTQSCB = 1
QINFIFO entries: 1
Waiting Queue entries:
Disconnected Queue entries: 2:0 3:19 1:2 0:15
QOUTFIFO entries:
Sequencer Free SCB List:
Pending list: 0 19 18 1 2 15
Kernel Free SCB list: 8 17 16 3 9 5 6 7 14 13 12 11 10
Untagged Q(0): 1
Untagged Q(1): 19
Untagged Q(2): 15
Untagged Q(3): 2
Untagged Q(4): 0
Untagged Q(5): 18
(probe0:ahc:1:1:3): SCB 0x4 - timed out while idle, SEQADDR == 0x1f
STACK == 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x18
SXFRCTL0 == 0x0
ahc: Dumping Card State at SEQADDR 0x1f
SCB Count = 20
Kernel NEXTQSCB = 17
Card NEXTQSCB = 0
QINFIFO entries:9 8 7 6 5 4 9 3 2 8 19 18 17 1 16 15 0 8 19 18 4 1 2 0 18 19
1 2 0 8 4 19 17 15 2 0 8 18 19 1 1 17 19 1 0 4 15 2 0 1 8
Wating Queue entries: 0:255 1:255 3:255 2:255
QOUTFIFO entries:
Sequencer FreeSCB List: 0 1 3 2
Pending list: 16 3 9 5 6 7 14 13 12 11 10
Untagged Q(0): 15 18
Untagged Q(1): 4 19
Untagged Q(2): 1
Untagged Q(3): 0
Untagged Q(4): 8
Untagged Q(5): 2
sg[0] - Addr 0x5653e84 : Length 36

Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
fault virtual address	= 0x0
fault code		= supervisor read, page not present
instruction pointer	= 0x8:0xc0141338
stack pointer		= 0x10:0xc027e034
frame pointer		= 0x10:0xc027e044
code segment		= base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b
			= DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1
processor eflags	= interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0
current process		= Idle
interrupt mask		= cam
kernel: type 12 trap, code=0
Stopped at	ahc_match_scb+0x18:	movl	0(%esi),%eax
db> trace
ahc_match_scb(c0dd8000,0,1,42,3,4,1) at ahc_match_scb+0x18
ahc_searsch_qinfifo(c0dd8000,1,42,3,4,1,0,1) at ahc_search_qinfifo+0xcd
ahc_timeout(c0ddf3dc,400000,0,0ffffffff) at ahc_timeout+0x504
softclock(0,10,10,10,ffffffff) at softclock+0xd1
doreti_swi() at doreti_swi+0xf
db>

Between the Card state dumps and the kernel panic a few seconds have gone by
where nothing sees to happen.
Sorry, no crash dump available. 

Anyone any ideas?

Regards,
Oliver
-- 
--------------------------------------------------------
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me in your ~/.signature
to help me spread!             <- Save this lifeform ;-)


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2 15:16:16 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from gemma.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (gemma.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [129.70.136.103])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85BDC37B401
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 15:15:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mime.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (mime.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE [129.70.134.6])
	by gemma.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (8.9.1/8.9.1/TechFak/pk+ro20000427) with SMTP id AAA08802
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 3 Feb 2001 00:15:57 +0100 (MET)
From: Oliver Schonefeld <oschonef@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
Received: by mime.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE (SMI-8.6/pk19971205)
	id AAA10255; Sat, 3 Feb 2001 00:15:56 +0100
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 00:15:56 +0100
To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: ahc eisa: disk probe fails -> kernel panic
Message-ID: <20010203001556.A10238@mime.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
References: <20010202235014.A10100@mime.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i
In-Reply-To: <20010202235014.A10100@mime.TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE>; from oschonef@TechFak.Uni-Bielefeld.DE on Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 11:50:14PM +0100
X-Zen: Oooommmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Eines schoenen Tages schrieb Oliver Schonefeld:
> 
> With recent commits to the ahc driver the kernel survises the probing of the
> adapter but when probing the drives I get some wierd SCSI debug stuff and a
> kernel panic.

Hmm ... if I disable disconnect in the adapter's bios, the machine comes up
normal, so it seems (at least for the 2742) support for disconnect operation
of scsi devices is somehow.

Regards,
Oliver
-- 
--------------------------------------------------------
Hi! I'm a .signature virus! Copy me in your ~/.signature
to help me spread!             <- Save this lifeform ;-)


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2 15:51:44 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from merganser.its.uu.se (merganser.its.uu.se [130.238.6.236])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CE7637B491
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 15:51:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from regulus.student.UU.SE ([130.238.5.2]:62687 "HELO
        ertr1013.student.uu.se") by merganser.its.uu.se with SMTP
	id <S4289AbRBBXvO>; Sat, 3 Feb 2001 00:51:14 +0100
Received: (qmail 2504 invoked by uid 1001); 2 Feb 2001 23:51:15 -0000
Date:   Sat, 3 Feb 2001 00:51:14 +0100
From: Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se>
To: Salvo Bartolotta <bartequi@inwind.it>
Cc: Joe.Warner@smed.com, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Going from 4.2 -RELEASE to 4.2 -STABLE: "make buildkernel" fails
Message-ID: <20010203005114.A2483@student.uu.se>
Mail-Followup-To: Salvo Bartolotta <bartequi@inwind.it>,
	Joe.Warner@smed.com, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
References: <852569E7.005F468C.00@Deimos.smed.com> <20010202.19364500@bartequi.ottodomain.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20010202.19364500@bartequi.ottodomain.org>; from bartequi@inwind.it on Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 07:36:45PM +0000
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 07:36:45PM +0000, Salvo Bartolotta wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Original Message <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
> 
> On 2/2/01, 6:24:27 PM, Joe.Warner@smed.com wrote regarding Going from 
> 4.2 -RELEASE to 4.2 -STABLE: "make buildkernel" fails:
> 
> 
> > Hi,
> 
> > I tried searching the archive of this list before
> > posting but couldn't find any information similar
> > to the problem I'm now facing.
> 
> > I had just installed FreeBSD 4.2 RELEASE on my
> > home PC and had CVSUP'd my ports and then
> > the source for STABLE.
>                  ^^^^^^^
>                  ^^^^^^^  
> 
> > Everything seemed to go fine with "make world"
> > and "mergemaster" but when I got to:
> 
> > "make buildkernel KERNCONF=MYKERNEL"
>                     ^^^^^^^^     
>                     ^^^^^^^^
> 
> 
> You should be using KERNEL instead of KERNCONF, shouldn't you ?

Not if he CVSUPd very recently. KERNCONF was MFCed to -STABLE a day or two
ago.

> 
> If you want to use KERNCONF, you will have to cvsup -CURRENT sources. 
> However, -CURRENT is NOT for ordinary users. You have beeen warned :-)




-- 
<Insert your favourite quote here.>
Erik Trulsson
ertr1013@student.uu.se



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2 16:40:38 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.66])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57E9137B6B2
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 16:40:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f130dw948465;
	Fri, 2 Feb 2001 17:40:09 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Message-Id: <200102030040.f130dw948465@harmony.village.org>
To: james@m-a.net
Subject: Re: Buildworld failure using two disks 
Cc: Wilko Bulte <wkb@freebie.demon.nl>,
	Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 27 Jan 2001 01:53:22 MST."
		<20010127015322.A679@dionysos.yi.org> 
References: <20010127015322.A679@dionysos.yi.org>  <20010126151748.A1958@dionysos.yi.org> <20010126200138.B52838@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010127085615.A9048@freebie.demon.nl> 
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 17:39:58 -0700
From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In message <20010127015322.A679@dionysos.yi.org> Dionysos writes:
: compiled and installed the latest version of ln, but it continues to be unable
: to make a symbolic link across disks.

that's very strange, since I build a NFS mounted source base with
/usr/obj being a local disk.  Maybe there's a file there that's
immutable?


Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2 17:18:30 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from wattres.Watt.COM (wattres.watt.com [205.178.120.6])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 455EA37B401
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 17:18:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from steve@localhost)
	by wattres.Watt.COM (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f131ICv95065
	for stable@freebsd.org; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 17:18:12 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from steve)
Message-Id: <200102030118.f131ICv95065@wattres.Watt.COM>
X-Newsgroups: local.freebsd-stable
In-Reply-To: <981078439-m2n-gw@Watt.COM>
References: <20010201160303.A38766@sunbay.com>
From: steve@Watt.COM (Steve Watt)
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 17:18:11 -0800
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.6 beta(5) 10/07/98)
To: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: - i810 is only supported on Linux/x86 -
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In article <981078439-m2n-gw@Watt.COM> you write:
>On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 04:03:03PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
>>XFree86 supports FreeBSD on i810 natively starting with
>>release 4.0.2.
>
>Hmm...
>But -CURRENT and -STABLE doesn't work smoothly with XFree86 4.0.2 installed
>from ports (at least on Intel 81x chipsets).
>
>I (and many others) have experienced problems with XFree86 4.0.2 such as:
>- X died if you switch back and forth to consoles
>- Many apps died with SIG 10 (bus error)

I'm seeing the same stability problems, plus one other.  Has anyone had
success using GL on 4.2-STABLE (5 Jan 01) with XF86-4.0.2?  When I
uncomment the module load from XF86Config, I get errors trying to execute
apps (like the GL screen savers from xscreensaver)
wattres.Watt.COM:/usr/ports/x11/xscreensaver/work/xscreensaver-3.26/hacks/glx
(steve@wattres) 51> ./moebius
/usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1: Undefined symbol "pthread_key_create"
wattres.Watt.COM:/usr/ports/x11/xscreensaver/work/xscreensaver-3.26/hacks/glx
(steve@wattres) 52> xdpyinfo | grep GL
    GLX
    SGI-GLX


Theories?  It's obvious that something doesn't have the libc_r linked,
but I'm not sure what piece is missing that.

Thanks!

-- 
Steve Watt KD6GGD  PP-ASEL-IA          ICBM: 121W 56' 57.8" / 37N 20' 14.9"
 Internet: steve @ Watt.COM                         Whois: SW32
   Free time?  There's no such thing.  It just comes in varying prices...


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2 18:17:20 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP
	id 865C637B401; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 18:16:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from walton.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP
          id <aa87985@salmon>; 3 Feb 2001 02:16:49 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 02:16:48 +0000
From: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie>
To: Tony Byrne <tony@nua.ie>
Cc: Andrew J Caines <A.J.Caines@altavista.net>,
	freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, phk@FreeBSD.ORG, echriste@702com.net
Subject: Re: syslogd throwing a hissy fit
Message-ID: <20010203021648.A73132@walton.maths.tcd.ie>
References: <20010124223705.A92362@gosset.maths.tcd.ie> <5qou6tkiba9jk6nbjepe9hn2g45hq560ep@4ax.com> <20010121021039.A442@hal9000.bsdonline.org> <7q9u6t0tkj5ktplad6k8468koar3j8jvi9@4ax.com> <s7hu6torq3c79usoqpgig3b56gg9d5n6jr@4ax.com> <20010124223705.A92362@gosset.maths.tcd.ie> <20010128162429.A412@hal9000.bsdonline.org> <alma7t4noj9u417v4t026fuuffkoflhf75@4ax.com> <20010129180459.D372@hal9000.bsdonline.org> <4mmd7tkja6j4j8qfhmidddi108eg188t2h@4ax.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <4mmd7tkja6j4j8qfhmidddi108eg188t2h@4ax.com>; from tony@nua.ie on Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 03:17:57PM +0000
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 03:17:57PM +0000, Tony Byrne wrote:

> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=24704

It turns out that syslogd is not checking the lof facility in
the correct way, and so is logging console messages back to the
console. The following patch should fix the problem.

I'll commit it to -current over the weekend unless phk objects,
and merge it into -stable next week.

	David.

Index: syslogd.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/FreeBSD-CVS/src/usr.sbin/syslogd/syslogd.c,v
retrieving revision 1.74
diff -u -r1.74 syslogd.c
--- syslogd.c	2000/12/16 18:25:48	1.74
+++ syslogd.c	2001/02/03 02:06:52
@@ -710,7 +710,7 @@
 			pri = 10 * pri + (*p - '0');
 		if (*p == '>')
 			++p;
-		if (LOG_FAC(pri) == LOG_CONSOLE)
+		if ((pri & LOG_FACMASK) == LOG_CONSOLE)
 			flags |= IGN_CONS;
 	} else {
 		/* kernel printf's come out on console */


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2 18:35:51 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (216-118-21-146.pdq.net [216.118.21.146])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49E0737B491
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 18:35:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dwcjr (DWCJR.inethouston.net [216.118.21.147])
	by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 40DDB177E9E; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 20:35:39 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <015f01c08d89$fd6eb1e0$931576d8@inethouston.net>
From: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net>
To: <james@m-a.net>, "Warner Losh" <imp@harmony.village.org>
Cc: "Wilko Bulte" <wkb@freebie.demon.nl>,
	"Kris Kennaway" <kris@obsecurity.org>, <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
References: <20010127015322.A679@dionysos.yi.org>  <20010126151748.A1958@dionysos.yi.org> <20010126200138.B52838@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010127085615.A9048@freebie.demon.nl>  <200102030040.f130dw948465@harmony.village.org>
Subject: Re: Buildworld failure using two disks 
Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 20:35:36 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

I think more of it had to do that the disk that was being compiled on was
msdosfs.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Warner Losh" <imp@harmony.village.org>
To: <james@m-a.net>
Cc: "Wilko Bulte" <wkb@freebie.demon.nl>; "Kris Kennaway"
<kris@obsecurity.org>; <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Sent: Friday, February 02, 2001 6:39 PM
Subject: Re: Buildworld failure using two disks


> In message <20010127015322.A679@dionysos.yi.org> Dionysos writes:
> : compiled and installed the latest version of ln, but it continues to be
unable
> : to make a symbolic link across disks.
>
> that's very strange, since I build a NFS mounted source base with
> /usr/obj being a local disk.  Maybe there's a file there that's
> immutable?
>
>
> Warner
>
>
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
>



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2 18:38:23 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from floater.nas.nasa.gov (floater.nas.nasa.gov [129.99.32.24])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAF2337B401
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 18:38:06 -0800 (PST)
Received: from floater.nas.nasa.gov (IDENT:kNTu3+tePUns+yJvrvFHlOl+bj4nCYSt@localhost.nas.nasa.gov [127.0.0.1])
	by floater.nas.nasa.gov (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f132c5B66513
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Fri, 2 Feb 2001 18:38:05 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from tweten@floater.nas.nasa.gov)
Message-Id: <200102030238.f132c5B66513@floater.nas.nasa.gov>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 with nmh-1.0.4
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Stable Isn't, for VLB 486 
In-Reply-To: Message from Dave Tweten <tweten@nas.nasa.gov> 
   of "Mon, 29 Jan 2001 12:49:30 PST."
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 18:38:04 -0800
From: Dave Tweten <tweten@nas.nasa.gov>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

A newer version of Stable (cvsupped January 30) has solved my VLB 486 kernel 
panic on boot problem.  The ahc0 driver works fine for me now.  Thanks for the 
help.
-- 
M/S 258-5                     | 1024-bit PGP fingerprint: | tweten@nas.nasa.gov
NASA Ames Research Center     |  41 B0 89 0A  8F 94 6C 59 |      (650) 604-4416
Moffett Field, CA  94035-1000 |  7C 80 10 20  25 C7 2F E6 | FAX: (650) 604-4377
We each earn what freedom of speech we defend for those who most offend us.




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2 19: 5:51 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.theinternet.com.au (zeus.theinternet.com.au [203.34.176.2])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D1FB37B401
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 19:05:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from akm@localhost)
	by mail.theinternet.com.au (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA98277;
	Sat, 3 Feb 2001 13:11:18 +1000 (EST)
	(envelope-from akm)
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 13:11:18 +1000
From: Andrew Kenneth Milton <akm@mail.theinternet.com.au>
To: David Bushong <david@bushong.net>
Cc: Darren <darren@tzeench.dhs.org>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: glx hardware 3d acceleration
Message-ID: <20010203131117.C86477@zeus.theinternet.com.au>
References: <Pine.BSF.4.32.0102021313470.8270-100000@tzeench.dhs.org> <20010202143251.L16505@bushong.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4i
In-Reply-To: <20010202143251.L16505@bushong.net>; from David Bushong on Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 02:32:51PM -0800
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

+-------[ David Bushong ]----------------------
| On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 01:16:54PM -0700, Darren wrote:
| >
| > ...
| >
| > also what other programs can I use to test OpenGL on my computer, I"m not
| > a huge quake fan.
| > 
| > -Darren
| > 
| I think Jordan answered your main question, so I'll answer this one:
| 
| I always test GL apps using the various GL-enabled XScreensaver bits 
| (/usr/ports/x11/xscreensaver), like "lament", "atlantis", "cage" and whatnot.

pulsar from the same group has a -fps option as well to display the framerate,
so you can a more objective feel for how its going.

-- 
Totally Holistic Enterprises Internet|  P:+61 7 3870 0066   | Andrew Milton
The Internet (Aust) Pty Ltd          |  F:+61 7 3870 4477   | 
ACN: 082 081 472 ABN: 83 082 081 472 |  M:+61 416 022 411   | Carpe Daemon
PO Box 837 Indooroopilly QLD 4068    |akm@theinternet.com.au| 


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2 19:29:35 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from harmony.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.66])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0643337B503
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 19:29:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1])
	by harmony.village.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f133T2949196;
	Fri, 2 Feb 2001 20:29:02 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org)
Message-Id: <200102030329.f133T2949196@harmony.village.org>
To: "David W. Chapman Jr." <dwcjr@inethouston.net>
Subject: Re: Buildworld failure using two disks 
Cc: james@m-a.net, "Wilko Bulte" <wkb@freebie.demon.nl>,
	"Kris Kennaway" <kris@obsecurity.org>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 02 Feb 2001 20:35:36 CST."
		<015f01c08d89$fd6eb1e0$931576d8@inethouston.net> 
References: <015f01c08d89$fd6eb1e0$931576d8@inethouston.net>  <20010127015322.A679@dionysos.yi.org> <20010126151748.A1958@dionysos.yi.org> <20010126200138.B52838@xor.obsecurity.org> <20010127085615.A9048@freebie.demon.nl> <200102030040.f130dw948465@harmony.village.org> 
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 20:29:02 -0700
From: Warner Losh <imp@harmony.village.org>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

In message <015f01c08d89$fd6eb1e0$931576d8@inethouston.net> "David W. Chapman Jr." writes:
: I think more of it had to do that the disk that was being compiled on was
: msdosfs.

That makes perfect sense.  msdosfs doesn't allow symlinks.

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Fri Feb  2 23: 7:58 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from sj-msg-core-2.cisco.com (sj-msg-core-2.cisco.com [171.69.43.88])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E5FC37B67D
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Fri,  2 Feb 2001 23:07:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com (bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com [171.70.84.42])
	by sj-msg-core-2.cisco.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA03910;
	Fri, 2 Feb 2001 23:07:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from bmah@localhost)
	by bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f1377bg67026;
	Fri, 2 Feb 2001 23:07:37 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from bmah)
Message-Id: <200102030707.f1377bg67026@bmah-freebsd-0.cisco.com>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/19/2001 with nmh-1.0.4
To: kstewart@urx.com
Cc: Joe.Warner@smed.com, Andrew.Hodgkins@hurlburt.af.mil,
	freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Going from 4.2 -RELEASE to 4.2 -STABLE: "make buildkernel" fails 
In-Reply-To: <3A7B2D8A.CD28F504@urx.com> 
References: <852569E7.0077DAF2.00@Deimos.smed.com> <3A7B2D8A.CD28F504@urx.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Kent Stewart <kstewart@urx.com>
   message dated "Fri, 02 Feb 2001 13:58:34 -0800."
From: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@FreeBSD.ORG>
Reply-To: bmah@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5<Pi&akO)o^8;[r
 %l(8ZHlbF`dD>v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A
 2V%N&+
X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif
X-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1157369933P";
	 micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 23:07:37 -0800
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

--==_Exmh_1157369933P
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

If memory serves me right, Kent Stewart wrote:
> 
> Joe.Warner@smed.com wrote:
> > 
> > Is there a copy of /usr/src/UPDATE from
> > FreeBSD 4.2 RELEASE that I could get off
> > of the web somewhere?
> > 
> > I just want a copy I can print out and take
> > home with me.
> 
> You can always find the latest source on the cvsweb.cgi at
> FreeBSD.org. For /usr/src/UPDATING look at
> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/UPDATING. You are interested
> in the RELENG_4 version. Just remember that the KERNCONF changes
> haven't been added to UPDATING yet.

Another place you can look is the release notes file...I added the 
little blurb about KERNCONF this morning (California time).  I'll 
probably tweak it a little when Warner adds it to UPDATING.

http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/release/texts/i386/RELNOTES.TXT
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/release/texts/alpha/RELNOTES.TXT

Bruce.



--==_Exmh_1157369933P
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: Exmh version 2.2 06/23/2000

iD8DBQE6e6452MoxcVugUsMRAj8KAJ4lksj5H5hmYLEgtdCh1kBsnZCObQCgtPWn
7rT3dTXoqmgiY7GOOZQcGKg=
=Fr9w
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--==_Exmh_1157369933P--


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Feb  3  3:58:54 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from pit.databus.com (p101-45.acedsl.com [160.79.101.45])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69C7B37B401
	for <stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat,  3 Feb 2001 03:58:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from barney@localhost)
	by pit.databus.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f13BwBr09573;
	Sat, 3 Feb 2001 06:58:11 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from barney)
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 06:58:11 -0500
From: Barney Wolff <barney@pit.databus.com>
To: Steve Watt <steve@Watt.COM>
Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: - i810 is only supported on Linux/x86 -
Message-ID: <20010203065810.A9504@pit.databus.com>
References: <20010201160303.A38766@sunbay.com> <981078439-m2n-gw@Watt.COM> <200102030118.f131ICv95065@wattres.Watt.COM>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <200102030118.f131ICv95065@wattres.Watt.COM>; from steve@Watt.COM on Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 05:18:11PM -0800
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Aha, something I can answer!  I just finished building xscreensaver
successfully, about 5 minutes ago, against xf 4.0.2.  The secret
is to add
CFLAGS+= -pthread
LDFLAGS+= -pthread
to the Makefile.  As I discovered this in pieces, I also had to add
-pthread to the LDFLAGS in
/usr/ports/x11/xscreensaver/work/xscreensaver-3.26/hacks/glx
but I don't know if that would have been necessary if I had
set the LDFLAGS from the start.

I don't know if this is the "right" solution, as presumably not
all the stuff needs -pthread, but what the heck, I can tolerate
a little inefficiency in a screensaver.

There might be a way to do this without recompiling, with LD_CONFIG
or some such magic, but I'll have to leave that to the real wizards.

Barney Wolff

On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 05:18:11PM -0800, Steve Watt wrote:
> In article <981078439-m2n-gw@Watt.COM> you write:
> >On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 04:03:03PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> >>XFree86 supports FreeBSD on i810 natively starting with
> >>release 4.0.2.
> >
> >Hmm...
> >But -CURRENT and -STABLE doesn't work smoothly with XFree86 4.0.2 installed
> >from ports (at least on Intel 81x chipsets).
> >
> >I (and many others) have experienced problems with XFree86 4.0.2 such as:
> >- X died if you switch back and forth to consoles
> >- Many apps died with SIG 10 (bus error)
> 
> I'm seeing the same stability problems, plus one other.  Has anyone had
> success using GL on 4.2-STABLE (5 Jan 01) with XF86-4.0.2?  When I
> uncomment the module load from XF86Config, I get errors trying to execute
> apps (like the GL screen savers from xscreensaver)
> wattres.Watt.COM:/usr/ports/x11/xscreensaver/work/xscreensaver-3.26/hacks/glx
> (steve@wattres) 51> ./moebius
> /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1: Undefined symbol "pthread_key_create"
> wattres.Watt.COM:/usr/ports/x11/xscreensaver/work/xscreensaver-3.26/hacks/glx
> (steve@wattres) 52> xdpyinfo | grep GL
>     GLX
>     SGI-GLX
> 
> 
> Theories?  It's obvious that something doesn't have the libc_r linked,
> but I'm not sure what piece is missing that.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -- 
> Steve Watt KD6GGD  PP-ASEL-IA          ICBM: 121W 56' 57.8" / 37N 20' 14.9"
>  Internet: steve @ Watt.COM                         Whois: SW32
>    Free time?  There's no such thing.  It just comes in varying prices...
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Feb  3  4:13:38 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from tzeench.dhs.org (h24-70-93-66.ed.shawcable.net [24.70.93.66])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8751437B401
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat,  3 Feb 2001 04:13:20 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (darren@localhost)
	by tzeench.dhs.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f13CDNI08461;
	Sat, 3 Feb 2001 05:13:23 -0700 (MST)
	(envelope-from darren@tzeench.dhs.org)
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 05:13:23 -0700 (MST)
From: Darren <darren@tzeench.dhs.org>
To: David Bushong <david@bushong.net>
Cc: <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject: Re: glx hardware 3d acceleration
In-Reply-To: <20010202143251.L16505@bushong.net>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.32.0102030507210.8431-100000@tzeench.dhs.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

your right, I didn't install the glx into the Xf86config..  I figured the
port would just add it in automatically.  it works great with glclock =)
however xscreensaver doesn't work too well...  I installed as it is in
/usr/ports/x11/xscreensaver  I then exec 'xscreensaver' as a basic user in
a csh shell... get a prompt with options "Demo" "Prefs" and "Help".  I
click demo and here is the verbose output:
xscreensaver: selecting events on extant windows... done.
xscreensaver-demo: not found
xscreensaver: child pid 8449 (<unknown>) exited abnormally (code 127).

the demo binary doesn't exist...
same error with "Prefs"
the only binary I did find was xscreensaver-command.  just wondering what
the deal is with that and why I don't have a -demo binary?

-Darren

On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, David Bushong wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 01:16:54PM -0700, Darren wrote:
> >
> > ...
> >
> > also what other programs can I use to test OpenGL on my computer, I"m not
> > a huge quake fan.
> >
> > -Darren
> >
> I think Jordan answered your main question, so I'll answer this one:
>
> I always test GL apps using the various GL-enabled XScreensaver bits
> (/usr/ports/x11/xscreensaver), like "lament", "atlantis", "cage" and whatnot.
>
> BTW, I have utah-glx working great for my TNT.. but I'm never buying another
> nVidia again unless they amend their XFree86-hating ways.
>
> --David Bushong
>



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Feb  3  5:39:17 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from moon.harmonic.co.il (moon.harmonic.co.il [192.116.140.65])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 501CE37B401; Sat,  3 Feb 2001 05:38:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from nobody@localhost)
	by moon.harmonic.co.il (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA31428;
	Sat, 3 Feb 2001 15:37:02 +0200
To: Steve Watt <steve@Watt.COM>
Subject: Re: - i810 is only supported on Linux/x86 -
Message-ID: <981207422.3a7c097e22b31@webmail.harmonic.co.il>
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 15:37:02 +0200 (IST)
From: Roman Shterenzon <roman@xpert.com>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG,
	sobomax@FreeBSD.ORG
References: <20010201160303.A38766@sunbay.com> <200102030118.f131ICv95065@wattres.Watt.COM>
In-Reply-To: <200102030118.f131ICv95065@wattres.Watt.COM>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.2
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Quoting Steve Watt <steve@Watt.COM>:

> In article <981078439-m2n-gw@Watt.COM> you write:
> >On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 04:03:03PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> >>XFree86 supports FreeBSD on i810 natively starting with
> >>release 4.0.2.
> >
> >Hmm...
> >But -CURRENT and -STABLE doesn't work smoothly with XFree86 4.0.2
> installed
> >from ports (at least on Intel 81x chipsets).
> >
> >I (and many others) have experienced problems with XFree86 4.0.2 such
> as:
> >- X died if you switch back and forth to consoles
> >- Many apps died with SIG 10 (bus error)
> 
> I'm seeing the same stability problems, plus one other.  Has anyone had
> success using GL on 4.2-STABLE (5 Jan 01) with XF86-4.0.2?  When I
> uncomment the module load from XF86Config, I get errors trying to
> execute
> apps (like the GL screen savers from xscreensaver)
> wattres.Watt.COM:/usr/ports/x11/xscreensaver/work/xscreensaver-3.26/hacks/glx
> (steve@wattres) 51> ./moebius
> /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1: Undefined symbol
> "pthread_key_create"
> wattres.Watt.COM:/usr/ports/x11/xscreensaver/work/xscreensaver-3.26/hacks/glx
> (steve@wattres) 52> xdpyinfo | grep GL
>     GLX
>     SGI-GLX
> 
> 
> Theories?  It's obvious that something doesn't have the libc_r linked,
> but I'm not sure what piece is missing that.

I was also bit by the same problem.
As far as I understand, it was introduced to the XFree-4.0.2 with Xthreads
addition. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
/usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4/files/patch-xthreads
Backing out this patch breaks things, for example graphics/xine.
The fact is, the Mesa gets built with threads, so the app has to be linked
with -pthread.
(BTW, have XFREE86_VERSION=4 in /etc/make.conf if you're using XF86 4.x)
Since it's Mesa related (and it needs to be installed for GLU), all applications 
that depend on it fail, for example - /usr/ports/palm/pose :(
Maxim, do you have any ideas about how to fix it?

--Roman Shterenzon, UNIX System Administrator and Consultant
[ Xpert UNIX Systems Ltd., Herzlia, Israel. Tel: +972-9-9522361 ]


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Feb  3  6:52:23 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from smtp3.libero.it (smtp3.libero.it [193.70.192.53])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1709D37B401
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat,  3 Feb 2001 06:52:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from MoonSpell.NewLuxor (151.33.116.161) by smtp3.libero.it (5.5.015.5)
        id 3A546BEB0130CB6F; Sat, 3 Feb 2001 15:52:04 +0100
Received: (from flag@localhost)
	by MoonSpell.NewLuxor (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f13DMCc00289;
	Sat, 3 Feb 2001 14:22:12 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from flag)
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 14:22:12 +0100
From: Paolo <flag@MoonSpell.NewLuxor>
To: j mckitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org>
Cc: John Merryweather Cooper <jmcoopr@webmail.bmi.net>,
	freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: parallel port zip plus driver
Message-ID: <20010203142212.A280@MoonSpell.NewLuxor>
References: <20010201144930.A74754@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <3A798947.EE4042AC@webmail.bmi.net> <20010201161117.C74754@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> <3A798D27.16411C2@webmail.bmi.net> <20010201164211.A76012@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20010201164211.A76012@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>; from jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org on Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 04:42:11PM +0000
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 04:42:11PM +0000, j mckitrick wrote:
> 
> Try this....
> 
> Be sure to set the flags for ppc to allow PS2 mode.

Maybe a stupid question:

break your patch anything? (like printer support&C)

If not, why don't you submite it?

-- 

Paolo


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Feb  3  7:37:12 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from btw.plaintalk.bellevue.wa.us (btw-xl1.plaintalk.bellevue.wa.us [206.129.5.130])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D4D037B401
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sat,  3 Feb 2001 07:36:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kwijibo (iow.plaintalk.bellevue.wa.us [206.129.5.152] (may be forged))
	by btw.plaintalk.bellevue.wa.us (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f13FarM70962
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sat, 3 Feb 2001 07:36:53 -0800 (PST)
From: Dennis Glatting <dennis.glatting@software-munitions.com>
Organization: Software Munitions
To: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Compile failure against RELENG_4
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 07:36:53 -0800
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.99]
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01020307365300.21492@kwijibo>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


Updated my sources yesterday. There were no changes to the tree today. 
So, I guess this must be a problem.


cd /disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc;  make depend;  make all;  make install
echo '#include <i386/xm-i386.h>'        > config.h
echo '#include <xm-freebsd.h>'                          >> config.h
echo '#include "gansidecl.h"'                           > tconfig.h
echo '#include "i386/xm-i386.h"'        >> tconfig.h
echo '#include "i386/i386.h"'   > tm.h
echo '#include "i386/att.h"'                    >> tm.h
echo '#include "svr4.h"'                                >> tm.h
echo '#include <freebsd.h>'                             >> tm.h
echo '#include "i386/freebsd.h"'                >> tm.h
echo '#include "i386/perform.h"'                >> tm.h
rm -f .depend
mkdep -f .depend -a    
-I/disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/config 
-I/disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc -I. -DIN_GCC 
-D_PTHREADS -DGTHREAD_USE_WEAK -I/usr/obj/disk-1/src/i386/usr/include  
/disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/frame.c
mkdep -f .depend -a   -nostdinc++ 
-I/disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/cp/inc  
/disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/cp/tinfo.cc 
/disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/cp/tinfo2.cc 
/disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/cp/new.cc 
/disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/cp/exception.cc
 
/disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/cp/exception.cc:33: 
gansidecl.h: No
such file or directory
/disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/cp/exception.cc:34: 
eh-common.h: No
such file or directory
mkdep: compile failed
*** Error code 1
 
Stop in /disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc.
*** Error code 1
 
Stop in /disk-1/src.
*** Error code 1
 
Stop in /disk-1/src.
*** Error code 1
                               


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Feb  3  7:46:33 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from veldy.net (w028.z064001117.msp-mn.dsl.cnc.net [64.1.117.28])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F56E37B401
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sat,  3 Feb 2001 07:46:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cascade (cascade.veldy.net [192.168.0.1])
	by veldy.net (Postfix) with SMTP
	id 33DAF8C2C; Sat,  3 Feb 2001 09:45:44 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <000801c08df8$46e3bd70$0100a8c0@cascade>
From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net>
To: "Keith J" <kjohnso8@columbus.rr.com>
Cc: <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
References: <006801c08d39$6974f9e0$3028680a@tgt.com> <008a01c08deb$1d8d3bc0$3601a8c0@keefer>
Subject: Re: Bridge and IPFW woes ...
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 09:45:04 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG



> I am curious... what are you using for GW route entries for Host A, B, C?

They all use the default gateway assigned by the ISP - in this instance we
can say 24.2.0.10.

>
> Try pointing  B & C GW / default route to the Host A internet interface
IP.
> Then add a static route entry for Host A's internet interface to push all
> 24.2.0.x
> net traffic to the internal (24.x.x.x) interface (be specific as shown
lest
> you loose
> all outside world access to any 24.x.x.x address!) Let the internet
> interface
> make all bridging / routing decisions.

I am not sure I get what you mean here.

>
> With DHCP running the default GW interface for B & C would be 24.2.0.1
> and it appears Host A 24 net is bridging to Host C when B talks and vice
> versa. Granted bridging should pass everything to every interface, but
> obviously
> that is not the case here and you should be glad.... because -
>
> I am not sure why you believe Host A can be a firewall to Host B & C and
do
> bridging. Firewall packet inspection is done at the IP level, if bridging
> occurs
> before this step the firewall is completely bypassed, and in both
> directions!
> Interface bridging is the same as plugging everything into a hub unless
you
> are
> filtering by MAC addresses.

IPFW does only filter IP - but the firewall code is set to deny everything
by default - and the documentation states that it does indeed deny
verthing  - including ARP requests.  To get ARP requests through - you need
to add this rule:

ipfw add 300 pass udp from 0.0.0.0 254 to 0.0.0.0 # pass arp for bridging

Now IP and ARP are all that should be passing the bridge.

>
> Furthermore, even if you are getting to the firewall code bridging allows
> all
> non IP i.e. IPX, Appletalk, NetBui, etc. traffic to flow out of your
network
> to the internet side where, hopefully, your ISP is dumping it. On the
other
> hand,
> if this is a "shared segement" as most cable / dsl systems are, anyone in
> your
> segment can see everything you are doing, internal log-ins, printing...
etc.

Yes, the segment is shared, but other peers on mysegment can not see me and
I can not see them.  I am connected to my ISP via a bridge, not a router.  I
think they route packets to the bridge, because I don't see any traffic for
other hosts on my segment.

>
> A more robust / safe design would be to avoid bridging all together, and
use
> NAT
> and a DMZ segment to perform your "network services". If you want to run
> seperate services on Host B & C use Host A firewall port forwarding rules
to
> direct
> traffic accordingly. If you absolutely positively need "outside world
> appearance" with
> extended URL's, run DNS on Host A to direct traffic to B & C.

Yes, I agree.  However, I need these hosts to have static IP addresses
because these are my desktop machines that occasionally host games.  At
least one game in particular has a faulty protocol where it uploads its IP
address instead of allowing the other end to determine it - thus everbody in
the world would see 10.0.0.1 instead of 24.2.0.2 for host B.  I am currently
running IPFilter with ipnat which uses bimap to map the public and private
IPs together, but it still does not work with this game (not to mention that
ftp proxy is broken horribly in IPFilter 3.4.8 which is bundled with FreeBSD
4.2).

Tom Veldhouse
veldy@veldy.net

>
> Keith
>




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Feb  3 11:16:53 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from rognan.net (privat.isk-tv.no [193.69.107.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 843F837B491
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sat,  3 Feb 2001 11:16:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 7128 invoked by uid 502); 3 Feb 2001 19:10:25 -0000
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 20:10:25 +0100
From: e-devil@e-devil.org
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: SoundBlaster Live-> hwptr went back
Message-ID: <20010203201025.A7110@e-devil.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

hi.

i just cvsup'ed today, and i got this hwptr went back error messages again.

just wanted to tell you to remove the line in channels.c, because it prints 
these error messages when i move the mouse, and the soundcard makes weird noises


			Oyvind Albrigtsen


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Feb  3 11:19:18 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (winston.osd.bsdi.com [204.216.27.229])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5DEB37B4EC
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat,  3 Feb 2001 11:19:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from winston.osd.bsdi.com (jkh@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by winston.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f13JIeP86242;
	Sat, 3 Feb 2001 11:18:40 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com)
To: Darren <darren@tzeench.dhs.org>
Cc: David Bushong <david@bushong.net>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: glx hardware 3d acceleration 
In-Reply-To: Message from Darren <darren@tzeench.dhs.org> 
   of "Sat, 03 Feb 2001 05:13:23 MST." <Pine.BSF.4.32.0102030507210.8431-100000@tzeench.dhs.org> 
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 11:18:40 -0800
Message-ID: <86238.981227920@winston.osd.bsdi.com>
From: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> your right, I didn't install the glx into the Xf86config..  I figured the
> port would just add it in automatically.  it works great with glclock =)
> however xscreensaver doesn't work too well...  I installed as it is in
> /usr/ports/x11/xscreensaver  I then exec 'xscreensaver' as a basic user in
> a csh shell... get a prompt with options "Demo" "Prefs" and "Help".  I
> click demo and here is the verbose output:
> xscreensaver: selecting events on extant windows... done.
> xscreensaver-demo: not found
> xscreensaver: child pid 8449 (<unknown>) exited abnormally (code 127).

The port maintainer for xscreensaver made a mistake (which I've
already reported to him) and left xscreensaver-demo off.  You should
build the port again and then manually install one of the two
xscreensaver-demo binaries from it - it makes two, one for Gtk and one
for Motif.  I prefer the Gtk one, but it doesn't matter which one you
install as xscreensaver-demo; after that, things will work.

- Jordan


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Feb  3 12:44: 7 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from bsdhome.dyndns.org (unknown [24.25.2.13])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 260D837B401
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sat,  3 Feb 2001 12:43:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from vger.bsdhome.com (vger [192.168.220.2])
	by bsdhome.dyndns.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f13Khik73092
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sat, 3 Feb 2001 15:43:44 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from bsd@bsdhome.com)
Received: (from bsd@localhost)
	by vger.bsdhome.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f13KhiR27586;
	Sat, 3 Feb 2001 15:43:44 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from bsd)
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 15:43:44 -0500
From: Brian Dean <bsd@bsdhome.com>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: installworld anomoly
Message-ID: <20010203154344.B27418@vger.bsdhome.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

My last several -stable installworlds have completed with the
messages:

[...]

--------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Rebuilding man page indices
--------------------------------------------------------------
cd /usr/src/share/man; make makedb
makewhatis /usr/share/man

gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe

gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe

gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe

gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe

[... message repeated many times ]

gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe

gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
makewhatis /usr/share/perl/man

gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe

gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe

gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe

gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe

gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe

gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
rm -rf /tmp/install.85245


Is anyone else seeing this?

Thanks,
-Brian


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Feb  3 12:45:14 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from dhcp101054.res-hall.nwu.edu (dhcp101054.res-hall.nwu.edu [199.74.101.54])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F34B537B491
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sat,  3 Feb 2001 12:44:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 20695 invoked by uid 1000); 3 Feb 2001 19:48:37 -0000
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 14:48:37 -0500
From: "Matthew J . Turk" <m-turk@nwu.edu>
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: enlightenment / gkrellm
Message-ID: <20010203144836.B20657@dhcp101054.res-hall.nwu.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hi there.  I've been having a *lot* of problems with enlightenment lately; for
various reasons it'll begin to suck up all of my resources (I can hear the jokes
from the WM/bb crowd already... ;-) until X crashes.

The only way I've been able to duplicate this is to run gkrellm, edit the
configuration, and then click on either 'apply' or 'ok.'  I've rebuilt E from a
clean and distclean-ed setup.

Where should I go with this?  Any more information I ought to send in?  Any
hints?

Thanks!


mjt
-- 
"Having said that, music is supposed to be
 in the world for celebration, ritual, and
 healing - that's the point for me."
		-- Trey Anastasio


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Feb  3 12:49:34 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.telocity.com (dsl-64-128-16-161.telocity.com [64.128.16.161])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 561BA37B491
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat,  3 Feb 2001 12:49:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from cgaff@localhost)
	by mail.telocity.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f13Kn9X00731;
	Sat, 3 Feb 2001 14:49:09 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from cgaff)
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 14:48:58 -0600
From: "Corey G." <ctgaff@telocity.com>
To: Brian Dean <bsd@bsdhome.com>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: installworld anomoly
Message-ID: <20010203144858.A699@telocity.com>
References: <20010203154344.B27418@vger.bsdhome.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20010203154344.B27418@vger.bsdhome.com>; from bsd@bsdhome.com on Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 03:43:44PM -0500
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

I was just going to report the same issue.  It happened last night and
at 11:00AM Central time with a stable cvsup.

install -c -o root -g wheel -m 444 sshd.8.gz  /usr/share/man/man8
===> etc
===> etc/sendmail

--------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Rebuilding man page indices
--------------------------------------------------------------
cd /usr/src/share/man; make makedb
makewhatis /usr/share/man

gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe

gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe

gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe

gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe

gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe

gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe


On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 03:43:44PM -0500, Brian Dean wrote:
> My last several -stable installworlds have completed with the
> messages:
> 
> [...]
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> Rebuilding man page indices
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> cd /usr/src/share/man; make makedb
> makewhatis /usr/share/man
> 
> gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> 
> gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> 
> gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> 
> gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> 
> [... message repeated many times ]
> 
> gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> 
> gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> makewhatis /usr/share/perl/man
> 
> gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> 
> gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> 
> gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> 
> gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> 
> gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> 
> gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> rm -rf /tmp/install.85245
> 
> 
> Is anyone else seeing this?
> 
> Thanks,
> -Brian
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
---end quoted text---

-- 
Best Regards,
Corey


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Feb  3 12:50:31 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from obsecurity.org (adsl-64-169-104-72.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.169.104.72])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A21F37B401
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat,  3 Feb 2001 12:50:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: by obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id C8E9ABA74C; Sat,  3 Feb 2001 12:50:44 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 12:50:44 -0800
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: Brian Dean <bsd@bsdhome.com>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: installworld anomoly
Message-ID: <20010203125044.A40718@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <20010203154344.B27418@vger.bsdhome.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ibTvN161/egqYuK8"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <20010203154344.B27418@vger.bsdhome.com>; from bsd@bsdhome.com on Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 03:43:44PM -0500
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


--ibTvN161/egqYuK8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 03:43:44PM -0500, Brian Dean wrote:

> Is anyone else seeing this?

Yes, it's a known bug in OpenSSH. There's a patch in the PR database,
I don't have the number handy, and haven't tried it myself.

Kris

--ibTvN161/egqYuK8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6fG8kWry0BWjoQKURAlYVAJ48u4XSh5lvE0sHWbd2YduQLv8g0wCgi5ec
+4fVIpJ6cyHXbCQqWRTXADU=
=yJ1N
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ibTvN161/egqYuK8--


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Feb  3 12:51:38 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from level3.dynacom.net (level3.dynacom.net [206.107.213.213])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 504B237B401
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sat,  3 Feb 2001 12:51:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 21758 invoked by uid 0); 3 Feb 2001 20:51:15 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO urx.com) (206.159.132.160)
  by mail.urx.com with SMTP; 3 Feb 2001 20:51:15 -0000
Message-ID: <3A7C6F42.C680954@urx.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 12:51:14 -0800
From: Kent Stewart <kstewart@urx.com>
Reply-To: kstewart@urx.com
Organization: Dynacom
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dennis Glatting <dennis.glatting@software-munitions.com>
Cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Compile failure against RELENG_4
References: <01020307365300.21492@kwijibo>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG



Dennis Glatting wrote:
> 
> Updated my sources yesterday. There were no changes to the tree today.
> So, I guess this must be a problem.

Well, I updated my sources last night and didn't have a problem doing
the usual buildworld, buildkernel, installkernel, and installworld.

What version did you start with? Are you trying to build a release
because I don't have a disk-1 directory.

Kent

> 
> cd /disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc;  make depend;  make all;  make install
> echo '#include <i386/xm-i386.h>'        > config.h
> echo '#include <xm-freebsd.h>'                          >> config.h
> echo '#include "gansidecl.h"'                           > tconfig.h
> echo '#include "i386/xm-i386.h"'        >> tconfig.h
> echo '#include "i386/i386.h"'   > tm.h
> echo '#include "i386/att.h"'                    >> tm.h
> echo '#include "svr4.h"'                                >> tm.h
> echo '#include <freebsd.h>'                             >> tm.h
> echo '#include "i386/freebsd.h"'                >> tm.h
> echo '#include "i386/perform.h"'                >> tm.h
> rm -f .depend
> mkdep -f .depend -a
> -I/disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/config
> -I/disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc -I. -DIN_GCC
> -D_PTHREADS -DGTHREAD_USE_WEAK -I/usr/obj/disk-1/src/i386/usr/include
> /disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/frame.c
> mkdep -f .depend -a   -nostdinc++
> -I/disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/cp/inc
> /disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/cp/tinfo.cc
> /disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/cp/tinfo2.cc
> /disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/cp/new.cc
> /disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/cp/exception.cc
> 
> /disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/cp/exception.cc:33:
> gansidecl.h: No
> such file or directory
> /disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/cp/exception.cc:34:
> eh-common.h: No
> such file or directory
> mkdep: compile failed
> *** Error code 1
> 
> Stop in /disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc.
> *** Error code 1
> 
> Stop in /disk-1/src.
> *** Error code 1
> 
> Stop in /disk-1/src.
> *** Error code 1
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

-- 
Kent Stewart
Richland, WA

mailto:kbstew99@hotmail.com
http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/index.html
FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Feb  3 12:53:30 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from level3.dynacom.net (level3.dynacom.net [206.107.213.213])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BB55937B491
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat,  3 Feb 2001 12:53:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 21846 invoked by uid 0); 3 Feb 2001 20:53:04 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO urx.com) (206.159.132.160)
  by mail.urx.com with SMTP; 3 Feb 2001 20:53:04 -0000
Message-ID: <3A7C6FB0.391291B7@urx.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 12:53:04 -0800
From: Kent Stewart <kstewart@urx.com>
Reply-To: kstewart@urx.com
Organization: Dynacom
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Corey G." <ctgaff@telocity.com>
Cc: Brian Dean <bsd@bsdhome.com>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: installworld anomoly
References: <20010203154344.B27418@vger.bsdhome.com> <20010203144858.A699@telocity.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG



"Corey G." wrote:
> 
> I was just going to report the same issue.  It happened last night and
> at 11:00AM Central time with a stable cvsup.

Don't use ssh to do the installworld. If you telnet, you don't have
any problem.

Kent

> 
> install -c -o root -g wheel -m 444 sshd.8.gz  /usr/share/man/man8
> ===> etc
> ===> etc/sendmail
> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> Rebuilding man page indices
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> cd /usr/src/share/man; make makedb
> makewhatis /usr/share/man
> 
> gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> 
> gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> 
> gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> 
> gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> 
> gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> 
> gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> 
> On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 03:43:44PM -0500, Brian Dean wrote:
> > My last several -stable installworlds have completed with the
> > messages:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>> Rebuilding man page indices
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > cd /usr/src/share/man; make makedb
> > makewhatis /usr/share/man
> >
> > gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> >
> > gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> >
> > gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> >
> > gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> >
> > [... message repeated many times ]
> >
> > gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> >
> > gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> > makewhatis /usr/share/perl/man
> >
> > gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> >
> > gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> >
> > gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> >
> > gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> >
> > gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> >
> > gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> > rm -rf /tmp/install.85245
> >
> >
> > Is anyone else seeing this?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > -Brian
> >
> >
> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
> ---end quoted text---
> 
> --
> Best Regards,
> Corey
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

-- 
Kent Stewart
Richland, WA

mailto:kbstew99@hotmail.com
http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/index.html
FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Feb  3 13:33:16 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.telocity.com (dsl-64-128-16-161.telocity.com [64.128.16.161])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F11D37B491
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat,  3 Feb 2001 13:32:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from cgaff@localhost)
	by mail.telocity.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f13LWoT00918;
	Sat, 3 Feb 2001 15:32:50 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from cgaff)
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 15:32:50 -0600
From: "Corey G." <ctgaff@telocity.com>
To: Kent Stewart <kstewart@urx.com>
Cc: Brian Dean <bsd@bsdhome.com>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: installworld anomoly
Message-ID: <20010203153250.B699@telocity.com>
References: <20010203154344.B27418@vger.bsdhome.com> <20010203144858.A699@telocity.com> <3A7C6FB0.391291B7@urx.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <3A7C6FB0.391291B7@urx.com>; from kstewart@urx.com on Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 12:53:04PM -0800
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Never would have guessed this one.  Thanks.

Corey


On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 12:53:04PM -0800, Kent Stewart wrote:
> 
> 
> "Corey G." wrote:
> > 
> > I was just going to report the same issue.  It happened last night and
> > at 11:00AM Central time with a stable cvsup.
> 
> Don't use ssh to do the installworld. If you telnet, you don't have
> any problem.
> 
> Kent
> 
> > 
> > install -c -o root -g wheel -m 444 sshd.8.gz  /usr/share/man/man8
> > ===> etc
> > ===> etc/sendmail
> > 
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > >>> Rebuilding man page indices
> > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > cd /usr/src/share/man; make makedb
> > makewhatis /usr/share/man
> > 
> > gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> > 
> > gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> > 
> > gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> > 
> > gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> > 
> > gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> > 
> > gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> > 
> > On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 03:43:44PM -0500, Brian Dean wrote:
> > > My last several -stable installworlds have completed with the
> > > messages:
> > >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >>> Rebuilding man page indices
> > > --------------------------------------------------------------
> > > cd /usr/src/share/man; make makedb
> > > makewhatis /usr/share/man
> > >
> > > gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> > >
> > > gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> > >
> > > gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> > >
> > > gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> > >
> > > [... message repeated many times ]
> > >
> > > gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> > >
> > > gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> > > makewhatis /usr/share/perl/man
> > >
> > > gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> > >
> > > gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> > >
> > > gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> > >
> > > gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> > >
> > > gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> > >
> > > gzcat: stdout: Broken pipe
> > > rm -rf /tmp/install.85245
> > >
> > >
> > > Is anyone else seeing this?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > -Brian
> > >
> > >
> > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
> > ---end quoted text---
> > 
> > --
> > Best Regards,
> > Corey
> > 
> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
> 
> -- 
> Kent Stewart
> Richland, WA
> 
> mailto:kbstew99@hotmail.com
> http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/index.html
> FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/
---end quoted text---

-- 
Best Regards,
Corey


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Feb  3 13:41:28 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from ns1.unixathome.org (ns1.unixathome.org [203.79.82.27])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 6CEA637B491; Sat,  3 Feb 2001 13:41:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wocker (wocker.int.nz.freebsd.org [192.168.0.99])
	by ns1.unixathome.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f13LLsR06494;
	Sun, 4 Feb 2001 10:21:55 +1300 (NZDT)
	(envelope-from dan@langille.org)
Message-Id: <200102032121.f13LLsR06494@ns1.unixathome.org>
From: "Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org>
Organization: novice in training
To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 10:41:02 +1300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: panic: ufs_dirbad: bad dir
Reply-To: dan@langille.org
Cc: freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
In-reply-to: <20010202052101.97419.qmail@mail.oregonfast.net>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

I had to give up on that disk.  I bought a new 10GB IDE to replace it (it's 
going to be vastly under-filled).

I still have the disk, so if anyone wants to follow this up, it is still intact.

On 2 Feb 2001, at 5:21, Dan Langille wrote:

> I recently upgraded a box from 4.1-stable to 4.2-stable. An NFS mount was
> used for the install world and install kernel.  During the kernel install
> the box panic'd (sorry, didn't see the message).  Upon boot, the box give
> these messages: 
> 
> Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a
> /: bad dir ino 2 at offset 0: mangled entry
> panic: ufs_dirbad: bad dir 
> 
> syncing disks.... 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1..etc
> giving up on 1 buffers 
> 
> 
> I did an fsck on the disk by moving it to another box. The above messages
> appeared both before and after the fsck. 
> 
> Clues please! 


--
Dan Langille
pgpkey - finger dan@unixathome.org | http://unixathome.org/finger.php


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Feb  3 14:27:32 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from wyattearp.stanford.edu (wyattearp.Stanford.EDU [171.64.180.171])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id E42CD37B401; Sat,  3 Feb 2001 14:27:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from richw@localhost)
	by wyattearp.stanford.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA86919;
	Sat, 3 Feb 2001 14:26:10 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from richw)
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 14:26:10 -0800 (PST)
From: Rich Wales <richw@webcom.com>
X-Sender: richw@wyattearp.stanford.edu
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: BRIDGE breaks ARP?
Message-ID: <20010203220223.86591.richw@wyattearp.stanford.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

I'm running -STABLE (cvsup'ed on 26jan2001) on a machine with the
BRIDGE option, bridging between two PCI NICs (rl0 and xl0).

I'm having ARP problems.  Machines on the "rl0" card are unable to
get a hardware address for the bridge.  (For whatever reason, I have
no problems talking via the "xl0" interface.)

I've done "tcpdump" on the bridge, and it's receiving ARP queries on
the "rl0" interface, but it doesn't appear to be sending replies.  I
did a "tcpdump" on the "xl0" interface too, just in case ARP replies
were going out over the wrong interface, but no such luck.

If I turn off bridging (sysctl -w net.link.ether.bridge=0), the ARP
problem quickly resolves itself.  So the problem would seem to be
related somehow to the bridge code.

I can sidestep the problem by using "arp -s" commands on the other
machines to tell them the bridge's hardware address -- but I really
shouldn't have to do this.

Any ideas?

Rich Wales         richw@webcom.com         http://www.webcom.com/richw/



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Feb  3 15:32:29 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mailhost01.reflexnet.net (mailhost01.reflexnet.net [64.6.192.82])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE47337B4EC
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sat,  3 Feb 2001 15:32:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com ([216.196.73.168]) by mailhost01.reflexnet.net  with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.197.19);
	 Sat, 3 Feb 2001 15:30:15 -0800
Received: (from cjc@localhost)
	by rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f13NVHd50998;
	Sat, 3 Feb 2001 15:31:17 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from cjc)
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 15:31:17 -0800
From: "Crist J. Clark" <cjclark@reflexnet.net>
To: Kent Stewart <kstewart@urx.com>
Cc: "Corey G." <ctgaff@telocity.com>, Brian Dean <bsd@bsdhome.com>,
	freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: installworld anomoly
Message-ID: <20010203153116.H91447@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex>
Reply-To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu
References: <20010203154344.B27418@vger.bsdhome.com> <20010203144858.A699@telocity.com> <3A7C6FB0.391291B7@urx.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i
In-Reply-To: <3A7C6FB0.391291B7@urx.com>; from kstewart@urx.com on Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 12:53:04PM -0800
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 12:53:04PM -0800, Kent Stewart wrote:
> 
> 
> "Corey G." wrote:
> > 
> > I was just going to report the same issue.  It happened last night and
> > at 11:00AM Central time with a stable cvsup.
> 
> Don't use ssh to do the installworld. If you telnet, you don't have
> any problem.

Or if you don't want to telnet, you just need to separate the IO from
ssh. You can do something like,

  # batch
  make buildworld
  ^D
  #

And you'll be fine.
-- 
Crist J. Clark                           cjclark@alum.mit.edu


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Feb  3 15:40:26 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mailhost01.reflexnet.net (mailhost01.reflexnet.net [64.6.192.82])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 02D7E37B4EC; Sat,  3 Feb 2001 15:40:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com ([216.196.73.168]) by mailhost01.reflexnet.net  with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.197.19);
	 Sat, 3 Feb 2001 15:38:10 -0800
Received: (from cjc@localhost)
	by rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f13NdHP51042;
	Sat, 3 Feb 2001 15:39:17 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from cjc)
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 15:39:17 -0800
From: "Crist J. Clark" <cjclark@reflexnet.net>
To: Rich Wales <richw@webcom.com>
Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: BRIDGE breaks ARP?
Message-ID: <20010203153917.I91447@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex>
Reply-To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu
References: <20010203220223.86591.richw@wyattearp.stanford.edu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i
In-Reply-To: <20010203220223.86591.richw@wyattearp.stanford.edu>; from richw@webcom.com on Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 02:26:10PM -0800
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 02:26:10PM -0800, Rich Wales wrote:
> I'm running -STABLE (cvsup'ed on 26jan2001) on a machine with the
> BRIDGE option, bridging between two PCI NICs (rl0 and xl0).
> 
> I'm having ARP problems.  Machines on the "rl0" card are unable to
> get a hardware address for the bridge.  (For whatever reason, I have
> no problems talking via the "xl0" interface.)

[snip]

> I can sidestep the problem by using "arp -s" commands on the other
> machines to tell them the bridge's hardware address -- but I really
> shouldn't have to do this.
> 
> Any ideas?

Not all cards support bridging. The bridge(4) manpage _used to_ have a
list of cards that work. Now all it says is,

    "Interfaces that cannot be put into promiscuous mode or that don't support
     sending packets with arbitrary Ethernet source addresses are not compati-
     ble with bridging."

And I have not been able to figure out if the rl(4) device satisfies
those conditions. I should note that rl(4) was not on the list of
working cards prior to the change in the manpage.

Maybe someone who knows more about the rl(4) driver can elaborate?
-- 
Crist J. Clark                           cjclark@alum.mit.edu


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Feb  3 16: 0:32 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from wyattearp.stanford.edu (wyattearp.Stanford.EDU [171.64.180.171])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 781A137B503; Sat,  3 Feb 2001 16:00:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from richw@localhost)
	by wyattearp.stanford.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA88678;
	Sat, 3 Feb 2001 15:59:08 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from richw)
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 15:59:08 -0800 (PST)
From: Rich Wales <richw@webcom.com>
X-Sender: richw@wyattearp.stanford.edu
To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu
Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: BRIDGE breaks ARP?
In-Reply-To: <20010203153917.I91447@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex>
Message-ID: <20010203234646.88009.richw@wyattearp.stanford.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Crist Clark wrote:

    > Not all cards support bridging.

As far as I can tell, the "rl" device is (or, at least, is supposed to
be) supported by the bridge code.

"ifconfig rl0" on my bridge shows the interface is running in promis-
cuous mode, and bridging works perfectly for me in all respects other
than ARP.

The "rl0" card in my bridge is identified as an "Accton MPX 5030/5038",
and I'm running it in 100baseTX full-duplex mode (connected to another
machine via a crossover cable).

Rich Wales         richw@webcom.com         http://www.webcom.com/richw/



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Feb  3 18:28:34 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from nanguo.chalmers.com.au (gateway.chalmers.com.au [203.1.96.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EE7737B4EC
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sat,  3 Feb 2001 18:28:08 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from robert@localhost)
	by nanguo.chalmers.com.au (8.11.0/8.11.0) id f142OLH10469
	for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 4 Feb 2001 12:24:21 +1000 (EST)
From: Robert Chalmers <robert@nanguo.chalmers.com.au>
Message-Id: <200102040224.f142OLH10469@nanguo.chalmers.com.au>
Subject: does cvsup replace/pull all files every time?
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 101 12:24:21 +1000 (EST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

I'm just wondering, being a first time user of cvsup, if every time it's run
it replaces or updates all the files, and downloads all the files every time?

also, I suppose it's impossible to cvsup to upgrade a 2.2-snap to 4.2 stable?

Robert
-- 
Support Whirled Peas. 
http://www.chalmers.com.au          robert@chalmers.com.au
Location: P.O. Box 2003. Mackay. 4740. 21'7" S, 149'14" E.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Feb  3 18:33:39 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from obsecurity.org (adsl-64-169-104-72.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [64.169.104.72])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2525937B4EC
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat,  3 Feb 2001 18:33:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: by obsecurity.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 6BD5ABA74C; Sat,  3 Feb 2001 18:33:50 -0800 (PST)
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 18:33:50 -0800
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: Robert Chalmers <robert@nanguo.chalmers.com.au>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: does cvsup replace/pull all files every time?
Message-ID: <20010203183350.A42875@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <200102040224.f142OLH10469@nanguo.chalmers.com.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
In-Reply-To: <200102040224.f142OLH10469@nanguo.chalmers.com.au>; from robert@nanguo.chalmers.com.au on Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 12:24:21PM +1000
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline

On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 12:24:21PM +1000, Robert Chalmers wrote:
> I'm just wondering, being a first time user of cvsup, if every time it's run
> it replaces or updates all the files, and downloads all the files every time?

See the cvsup FAQ on www.polstra.com, but basically it only sends the
bits which have changed, unless that would mean more traffic than just
sending the entire file.

> also, I suppose it's impossible to cvsup to upgrade a 2.2-snap to 4.2 stable?

It's quite possible, but again see the FAQ.

Kris

--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org

iD8DBQE6fL+OWry0BWjoQKURAkvXAJ9xjp+JGvPfpVa3TRUvrcfgJHQG3QCfTx+l
UwqtxDPzQ20AWGOrQUHqM/w=
=eaiC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Nq2Wo0NMKNjxTN9z--


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Feb  3 18:43: 0 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from jb.technomatter.com (cr534527-a.etob1.on.wave.home.com [24.112.190.245])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEFE037B503
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>; Sat,  3 Feb 2001 18:42:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from jbond@localhost)
	by jb.technomatter.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) id f142hRb00768
	for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 3 Feb 2001 21:43:27 -0500 (EST)
	(envelope-from jbond)
From: Vladimir Linnik <vladimirl@home.com>
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 21:43:27 -0500
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.99]
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org
Subject: laptop & ide-cd-writer
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01020321432700.00750@jb.technomatter.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Hi All,

How can I copy cd on FreeBSD 4.2-stable? 
I have cd-writer on DELL 5000e clone.

from dmesg

acd0: CD-RW <UJDA310> at ata1-master using PIO4

I tried cdrecord & cdrdao but thay work just with SCSI.
How I can enable ide-cd-writer on FreeBSD?

Thanks,
vl


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Feb  3 18:53:45 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from btw.plaintalk.bellevue.wa.us (btw-xl1.plaintalk.bellevue.wa.us [206.129.5.130])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0BA937B491
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sat,  3 Feb 2001 18:53:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kwijibo (iow.plaintalk.bellevue.wa.us [206.129.5.152] (may be forged))
	by btw.plaintalk.bellevue.wa.us (8.11.2/8.11.2) with SMTP id f142rP378450;
	Sat, 3 Feb 2001 18:53:25 -0800 (PST)
From: Dennis Glatting <dennis.glatting@software-munitions.com>
Organization: Software Munitions
To: Kent Stewart <kstewart@urx.com>
Subject: Re: Compile failure against RELENG_4
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 18:53:24 -0800
X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.1.99]
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="us-ascii"
Cc: stable@freebsd.org
References: <01020307365300.21492@kwijibo> <3A7C6F42.C680954@urx.com>
In-Reply-To: <3A7C6F42.C680954@urx.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <01020318532400.26057@kwijibo>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Saturday 03 February 2001 12:51 pm, Kent Stewart wrote:
> Dennis Glatting wrote:
> > Updated my sources yesterday. There were no changes to the tree
> > today. So, I guess this must be a problem.
>
> Well, I updated my sources last night and didn't have a problem doing
> the usual buildworld, buildkernel, installkernel, and installworld.
>
> What version did you start with? Are you trying to build a release
> because I don't have a disk-1 directory.
>

I feed several local machines from a CVS tree that I keep up to date 
from cvsup8.freebsd.org. The source in question has checked out against 
the RELENG_4 tag several times since 4.2. /usr/src is a symlink into 
/disk-1 on this machine. The last time I built RELENG_4 was January 10, 
2001. When I compiler all I say is "make buildworld."


> Kent
>
> > cd /disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc;  make depend;  make all;  make
> > install echo '#include <i386/xm-i386.h>'        > config.h
> > echo '#include <xm-freebsd.h>'                          >> config.h
> > echo '#include "gansidecl.h"'                           > tconfig.h
> > echo '#include "i386/xm-i386.h"'        >> tconfig.h
> > echo '#include "i386/i386.h"'   > tm.h
> > echo '#include "i386/att.h"'                    >> tm.h
> > echo '#include "svr4.h"'                                >> tm.h
> > echo '#include <freebsd.h>'                             >> tm.h
> > echo '#include "i386/freebsd.h"'                >> tm.h
> > echo '#include "i386/perform.h"'                >> tm.h
> > rm -f .depend
> > mkdep -f .depend -a
> > -I/disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/config
> > -I/disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc -I. -DIN_GCC
> > -D_PTHREADS -DGTHREAD_USE_WEAK
> > -I/usr/obj/disk-1/src/i386/usr/include
> > /disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/frame.c
> > mkdep -f .depend -a   -nostdinc++
> > -I/disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/cp/inc
> > /disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/cp/tinfo.cc
> > /disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/cp/tinfo2.cc
> > /disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/cp/new.cc
> > /disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/cp/exception.cc
> >
> > /disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/cp/exception.cc:33:
> > gansidecl.h: No
> > such file or directory
> > /disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/cp/exception.cc:34:
> > eh-common.h: No
> > such file or directory
> > mkdep: compile failed
> > *** Error code 1
> >
> > Stop in /disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc.
> > *** Error code 1
> >
> > Stop in /disk-1/src.
> > *** Error code 1
> >
> > Stop in /disk-1/src.
> > *** Error code 1
> >
> >
> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Feb  3 19:39:28 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from level3.dynacom.net (level3.dynacom.net [206.107.213.213])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 310C137B491
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sat,  3 Feb 2001 19:39:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: (qmail 28182 invoked by uid 0); 4 Feb 2001 03:39:07 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO urx.com) (206.159.132.160)
  by mail.urx.com with SMTP; 4 Feb 2001 03:39:07 -0000
Message-ID: <3A7CCEDB.A74A83D5@urx.com>
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 19:39:07 -0800
From: Kent Stewart <kstewart@urx.com>
Reply-To: kstewart@urx.com
Organization: Dynacom
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Dennis Glatting <dennis.glatting@software-munitions.com>
Cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Compile failure against RELENG_4
References: <01020307365300.21492@kwijibo> <3A7C6F42.C680954@urx.com> <01020318532400.26057@kwijibo>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG



Dennis Glatting wrote:
> 
> On Saturday 03 February 2001 12:51 pm, Kent Stewart wrote:
> > Dennis Glatting wrote:
> > > Updated my sources yesterday. There were no changes to the tree
> > > today. So, I guess this must be a problem.
> >
> > Well, I updated my sources last night and didn't have a problem doing
> > the usual buildworld, buildkernel, installkernel, and installworld.
> >
> > What version did you start with? Are you trying to build a release
> > because I don't have a disk-1 directory.
> >
> 
> I feed several local machines from a CVS tree that I keep up to date
> from cvsup8.freebsd.org. The source in question has checked out against
> the RELENG_4 tag several times since 4.2. /usr/src is a symlink into
> /disk-1 on this machine. The last time I built RELENG_4 was January 10,
> 2001. When I compiler all I say is "make buildworld."

I also use cvsup8 and have a number of successful cvsup's and build's
since 26 Jan. Four of them have been run since 1 Feb. I don't have any
idea what is wrong at your site. I don't have any symlinks but do
mount /usr/src and /usr/obj on different HD's.

Kent

> 
> > Kent
> >
> > > cd /disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc;  make depend;  make all;  make
> > > install echo '#include <i386/xm-i386.h>'        > config.h
> > > echo '#include <xm-freebsd.h>'                          >> config.h
> > > echo '#include "gansidecl.h"'                           > tconfig.h
> > > echo '#include "i386/xm-i386.h"'        >> tconfig.h
> > > echo '#include "i386/i386.h"'   > tm.h
> > > echo '#include "i386/att.h"'                    >> tm.h
> > > echo '#include "svr4.h"'                                >> tm.h
> > > echo '#include <freebsd.h>'                             >> tm.h
> > > echo '#include "i386/freebsd.h"'                >> tm.h
> > > echo '#include "i386/perform.h"'                >> tm.h
> > > rm -f .depend
> > > mkdep -f .depend -a
> > > -I/disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/config
> > > -I/disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc -I. -DIN_GCC
> > > -D_PTHREADS -DGTHREAD_USE_WEAK
> > > -I/usr/obj/disk-1/src/i386/usr/include
> > > /disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/frame.c
> > > mkdep -f .depend -a   -nostdinc++
> > > -I/disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/cp/inc
> > > /disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/cp/tinfo.cc
> > > /disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/cp/tinfo2.cc
> > > /disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/cp/new.cc
> > > /disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/cp/exception.cc
> > >
> > > /disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/cp/exception.cc:33:
> > > gansidecl.h: No
> > > such file or directory
> > > /disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/cp/exception.cc:34:
> > > eh-common.h: No
> > > such file or directory
> > > mkdep: compile failed
> > > *** Error code 1
> > >
> > > Stop in /disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc.
> > > *** Error code 1
> > >
> > > Stop in /disk-1/src.
> > > *** Error code 1
> > >
> > > Stop in /disk-1/src.
> > > *** Error code 1
> > >
> > >
> > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message

-- 
Kent Stewart
Richland, WA

mailto:kbstew99@hotmail.com
http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/index.html
FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Feb  3 19:52:44 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from lerami.lerctr.org (lerami.lerctr.org [207.158.72.11])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64F7137B491
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat,  3 Feb 2001 19:52:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from ler@localhost)
	by lerami.lerctr.org (8.11.2/8.11.2/20010112/$Revision: 1.13 $) id f143qP604147
	for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Sat, 3 Feb 2001 21:52:25 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from ler)
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 21:52:25 -0600
From: Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>
To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: does cvsup replace/pull all files every time?
Message-ID: <20010203215225.A4009@lerami.lerctr.org>
References: <200102040224.f142OLH10469@nanguo.chalmers.com.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.14i
In-Reply-To: <200102040224.f142OLH10469@nanguo.chalmers.com.au>; from robert@nanguo.chalmers.com.au on Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 12:24:21PM +1000
X-Mailer: Mutt http://www.mutt.org/
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

* Robert Chalmers <robert@nanguo.chalmers.com.au> [010203 21:19]:
> I'm just wondering, being a first time user of cvsup, if every time it's run
> it replaces or updates all the files, and downloads all the files every time?
NO, just the CHANGES to the files, and any new ones, and deletes
obsolete stuff.
> 
> also, I suppose it's impossible to cvsup to upgrade a 2.2-snap to 4.2 stable?
I believe that is true.
> 
> Robert
> -- 
> Support Whirled Peas. 
> http://www.chalmers.com.au          robert@chalmers.com.au
> Location: P.O. Box 2003. Mackay. 4740. 21'7" S, 149'14" E.
> 
> 
> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
> with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
-- 
Larry Rosenman                     http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812                 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org
US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Feb  3 20:30:59 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from grumpy.dyndns.org (user-24-214-56-129.knology.net [24.214.56.129])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F66E37B491
	for <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat,  3 Feb 2001 20:30:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by grumpy.dyndns.org (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id f144UDN09028;
	Sat, 3 Feb 2001 22:30:13 -0600 (CST)
	(envelope-from dkelly@grumpy.dyndns.org)
Message-Id: <200102040430.f144UDN09028@grumpy.dyndns.org>
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 with nmh-1.0.4
To: Vladimir Linnik <vladimirl@home.com>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
From: David Kelly <dkelly@hiwaay.net>
Subject: Re: laptop & ide-cd-writer 
In-reply-to: Message from Vladimir Linnik <vladimirl@home.com> 
   of "Sat, 03 Feb 2001 21:43:27 EST." <01020321432700.00750@jb.technomatter.com> 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Sat, 03 Feb 2001 22:30:13 -0600
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Vladimir Linnik writes:
> Hi All,
> 
> How can I copy cd on FreeBSD 4.2-stable? 
> I have cd-writer on DELL 5000e clone.
> 
> from dmesg
> 
> acd0: CD-RW <UJDA310> at ata1-master using PIO4
> 
> I tried cdrecord & cdrdao but thay work just with SCSI.
> How I can enable ide-cd-writer on FreeBSD?

This is more appropriate for freebsd-questions than -stable.

% man burncd

The command is something like (but verify before you try):

% burncd -f /dev/acd0c -s 4 -e data 4.2-RELEASE.iso fixate

To generate an image suitable for burncd (or cdrecord) you need the 
mkisofs port. Running mkisofs is much harder.

--
David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@hiwaay.net
=====================================================================
The human mind ordinarily operates at only ten percent of its
capacity -- the rest is overhead for the operating system.




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Feb  3 21:20:53 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from veldy.net (w028.z064001117.msp-mn.dsl.cnc.net [64.1.117.28])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20BB637B401
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sat,  3 Feb 2001 21:20:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from cascade (cascade.veldy.net [192.168.0.1])
	by veldy.net (Postfix) with SMTP
	id 013FC8C2C; Sat,  3 Feb 2001 23:20:04 -0600 (CST)
Message-ID: <003f01c08e6a$0b267080$0100a8c0@cascade>
From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy@veldy.net>
To: "Keith J" <kjohnso8@columbus.rr.com>
Cc: <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
References: <006801c08d39$6974f9e0$3028680a@tgt.com> <008a01c08deb$1d8d3bc0$3601a8c0@keefer> <000801c08df8$46e3bd70$0100a8c0@cascade> <000b01c08e13$8a255880$3601a8c0@keefer>
Subject: Re: Bridge and IPFW woes ...
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 23:19:27 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


>
> You are saying two things that make a big difference, you say Host A is
> providing DHCP address, and that the addresses are external network
> addresses. Just how are they assigned... DHCP, Static, or using a
> secondary (i.e. multiple IP's for the same interface)?

No, the outer interface is without an IP and the internal interface has an
IP.  All IPs on my network are public - via the bridge.

>
> If you are using the default gateway from the ISP then in essence you are
> asking the ISP router to know where your internal network is, which he
> doesn't. As I said, you need to point the B & C machines to A so A can
> route the packet to the internal network interface so B can talk to C and
> vice versa. If the traffic is going outside the internal network then he
> will
> route it to the ISP interface, provided you build the route I suggested
> earlier,
> and limited to the span of internal addresses you use.

The entire network works just fine.  But when the second computer comes
online, Host A seems to disappear from the outside (to Host A everything
appears OK).  The bridge continues to work correctly however and the filter
rules with IPFW also work (all running on host A).

>
> The system must have a way of knowing what addresses to find on what
> interface for reliable communications, that is done by address and
netmask.
> Otherwise just hang everything off a hub, becasue that is all bridging is
> doing
> in this case.

No, I need ipfw to filter the packets on the way through the bridge.  The
filtering works fine, but occasionally Host A will drop off the radar.
Eventually it will reappear and work as normal (could be hours or days).
Even though Host A appears to be gone, the bridge code running on Host A
works fine and all packets are bridged and filtered.


I know this exact setup will also work with OpenBSD using BRIDGE and
IPFILTER - except I don't know if they support setting an IP address for an
interface that is part of the bridge (which is what I am doing here).

Incidentally, I have this same setup running on my brothers network and it
works fine for him (as mine used to).  Something changed between 12-31-2000
and 1-30-2001 that has caused this.

Tom Veldhouse
veldy@veldy.net




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Feb  3 22:27:10 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from nanguo.chalmers.com.au (gateway.chalmers.com.au [203.1.96.1])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D02D037B4EC
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sat,  3 Feb 2001 22:26:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from robert@localhost)
	by nanguo.chalmers.com.au (8.11.0/8.11.0) id f146N8m11098
	for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 4 Feb 2001 16:23:08 +1000 (EST)
From: Robert Chalmers <robert@nanguo.chalmers.com.au>
Message-Id: <200102040623.f146N8m11098@nanguo.chalmers.com.au>
Subject: how long for makeworld to complete!!!!
To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 101 16:23:07 +1000 (EST)
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL22 (25)]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Just wondering - after hours and hours and hours - just how long 
makeworld takes on a P233+128Mb  doing 4 -> 4.2  ( I hope?)

robert
-- 
Support Whirled Peas. 
http://www.chalmers.com.au          robert@chalmers.com.au
Location: P.O. Box 2003. Mackay. 4740. 21'7" S, 149'14" E.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Feb  3 22:57:30 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from wyattearp.stanford.edu (wyattearp.Stanford.EDU [171.64.180.171])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 2D18F37B401; Sat,  3 Feb 2001 22:57:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from richw@localhost)
	by wyattearp.stanford.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) id WAA95256;
	Sat, 3 Feb 2001 22:56:11 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from richw)
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 22:56:11 -0800 (PST)
From: Rich Wales <richw@webcom.com>
X-Sender: richw@wyattearp.stanford.edu
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: BRIDGE breaks ARP? (more info)
In-Reply-To: <20010203220223.86591.richw@wyattearp.stanford.edu>
Message-ID: <20010204062837.94849.richw@wyattearp.stanford.edu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Earlier, I reported an ARP problem on a 4.2-STABLE bridge system.

A few people wrote me privately, advising me to include a firewall
rule passing UDP packets on port 2054 to/from the IP address 0.0.0.0.

I've tried this, but it doesn't help any.  I should mention, though,
that I don't think this firewall rule is relevant in any case.

First, the "port 2054" kludge doesn't appear to be in the networking
code any more.  I grep'ed the entire -STABLE base source for any
references to UDP port 2054, and I found nothing at all except for
the commented-out line in the etc/rc.firewall file.  As far as I'm
aware, bridging of non-IP packets is now controlled by the kernel's
default "ipfw" rule -- and, yes, I do have the options IPFIREWALL
and IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT in my configuration.

Second, I'm not talking about bridging of ARP packets anyway.  I'm
trying to connect directly to the bridge machine -- but the bridge
is failing to respond to requests for its own hardware address on
its "rl0" interface.

Rich Wales         richw@webcom.com         http://www.webcom.com/richw/



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Feb  3 23:16:48 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from netcabo.pt (unknown [212.113.161.135])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C01D37B401
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sat,  3 Feb 2001 23:16:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from OpsyDopsy ([213.22.0.4]) by netcabo.pt  with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.537.53);
	 Sun, 4 Feb 2001 07:13:19 +0000
Date: Sun, 04 Feb 2001 07:18:33 -0000
To: stable@freebsd.org
From: Joćo Fernandes <OpsyDopsy@netcabo.pt>
Subject: SBLive
Reply-To: OpsyDopsy@netcabo.pt
X-Mailer: Opera 5.00 build 828
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-ID: <0a5871913070421TVCABO05@netcabo.pt>
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

Does anyone knows how I can set up all 4 speakers of the SBLive?

Is it still not supported?

Thanks in advance.

Joao Fernandes




To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Feb  3 23:36:21 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mail.newmax.net (newmax.net [207.7.58.195])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E95C437B401
	for <stable@FreeBSD.org>; Sat,  3 Feb 2001 23:36:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from Spooler by mail.newmax.net (Mercury/32 v3.21c) ID MO001122;
    4 Feb 01 01:48:50 -0600
Received: from spooler by mail.newmax.net (Mercury/32 v3.21c); 4 Feb 01 01:48:44 -0600
Received: from thematrix (24.131.154.54) by smtp.newmax.net (Mercury/32 v3.21c) ID MG001121;
   4 Feb 01 01:48:27 -0600
Message-ID: <000a01c08e7c$f1e99580$0200000a@thematrix>
From: "Justin Head" <justin@newmax.net>
To: <stable@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: 
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 01:34:44 -0600
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
	boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0007_01C08E4A.A6DE1430"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C08E4A.A6DE1430
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable



------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C08E4A.A6DE1430
Content-Type: text/html;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 5.50.4611.1300" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV></BODY></HTML>

------=_NextPart_000_0007_01C08E4A.A6DE1430--



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sat Feb  3 23:38:23 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mailhost01.reflexnet.net (mailhost01.reflexnet.net [64.6.192.82])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 219E437B401
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Sat,  3 Feb 2001 23:38:05 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com ([216.196.73.168]) by mailhost01.reflexnet.net  with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.197.19);
	 Sat, 3 Feb 2001 23:36:13 -0800
Received: (from cjc@localhost)
	by rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f147bGp54190;
	Sat, 3 Feb 2001 23:37:16 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from cjc)
Date: Sat, 3 Feb 2001 23:37:15 -0800
From: "Crist J. Clark" <cjclark@reflexnet.net>
To: Dennis Glatting <dennis.glatting@software-munitions.com>
Cc: Kent Stewart <kstewart@urx.com>, stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Compile failure against RELENG_4
Message-ID: <20010203233715.P91447@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex>
Reply-To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu
References: <01020307365300.21492@kwijibo> <3A7C6F42.C680954@urx.com> <01020318532400.26057@kwijibo>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i
In-Reply-To: <01020318532400.26057@kwijibo>; from dennis.glatting@software-munitions.com on Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 06:53:24PM -0800
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Sat, Feb 03, 2001 at 06:53:24PM -0800, Dennis Glatting wrote:
> On Saturday 03 February 2001 12:51 pm, Kent Stewart wrote:
> > Dennis Glatting wrote:
> > > Updated my sources yesterday. There were no changes to the tree
> > > today. So, I guess this must be a problem.
> >
> > Well, I updated my sources last night and didn't have a problem doing
> > the usual buildworld, buildkernel, installkernel, and installworld.
> >
> > What version did you start with? Are you trying to build a release
> > because I don't have a disk-1 directory.
> >
> 
> I feed several local machines from a CVS tree that I keep up to date 
> from cvsup8.freebsd.org. The source in question has checked out against 
> the RELENG_4 tag several times since 4.2. /usr/src is a symlink into 
> /disk-1 on this machine. The last time I built RELENG_4 was January 10, 
> 2001. When I compiler all I say is "make buildworld."
> 
> 
> > Kent
> >
> > > cd /disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc;  make depend;  make all;  make
> > > install echo '#include <i386/xm-i386.h>'        > config.h
> > > echo '#include <xm-freebsd.h>'                          >> config.h
> > > echo '#include "gansidecl.h"'                           > tconfig.h
> > > echo '#include "i386/xm-i386.h"'        >> tconfig.h
> > > echo '#include "i386/i386.h"'   > tm.h
> > > echo '#include "i386/att.h"'                    >> tm.h
> > > echo '#include "svr4.h"'                                >> tm.h
> > > echo '#include <freebsd.h>'                             >> tm.h
> > > echo '#include "i386/freebsd.h"'                >> tm.h
> > > echo '#include "i386/perform.h"'                >> tm.h
> > > rm -f .depend
> > > mkdep -f .depend -a
> > > -I/disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/config
> > > -I/disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc -I. -DIN_GCC
> > > -D_PTHREADS -DGTHREAD_USE_WEAK
> > > -I/usr/obj/disk-1/src/i386/usr/include
> > > /disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/frame.c
> > > mkdep -f .depend -a   -nostdinc++ -I/disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/cp/inc /disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/cp/tinfo.cc /disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/cp/tinfo2.cc /disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/cp/new.cc /disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/cp/exception.cc

[line wrap damage repaired]

That line is missing a bunch of '-I' directories. Thus,

> > > /disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/cp/exception.cc:33:
> > > gansidecl.h: No
> > > such file or directory
> > > /disk-1/src/gnu/lib/libgcc/../../../contrib/gcc/cp/exception.cc:34:
> > > eh-common.h: No
> > > such file or directory
> > > mkdep: compile failed
> > > *** Error code 1

These kinds of errors.

One thing I notice is that the one '-I' is there is in teh src
directory rather than the obj directory.

What was your command line again?
-- 
Crist J. Clark                           cjclark@alum.mit.edu


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message


From owner-freebsd-stable  Sun Feb  4  0: 8:40 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mailhost01.reflexnet.net (mailhost01.reflexnet.net [64.6.192.82])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F2F137B4EC
	for <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>; Sun,  4 Feb 2001 00:08:19 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com ([216.196.73.168]) by mailhost01.reflexnet.net  with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.5.1877.197.19);
	 Sun, 4 Feb 2001 00:06:23 -0800
Received: (from cjc@localhost)
	by rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflexcom.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) id f1487Oe54372;
	Sun, 4 Feb 2001 00:07:24 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from cjc)
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 00:07:17 -0800
From: "Crist J. Clark" <cjclark@reflexnet.net>
To: Robert Chalmers <robert@nanguo.chalmers.com.au>
Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: how long for makeworld to complete!!!!
Message-ID: <20010204000717.Q91447@rfx-216-196-73-168.users.reflex>
Reply-To: cjclark@alum.mit.edu
References: <200102040623.f146N8m11098@nanguo.chalmers.com.au>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 1.0i
In-Reply-To: <200102040623.f146N8m11098@nanguo.chalmers.com.au>; from robert@nanguo.chalmers.com.au on Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 04:23:07PM +1000
Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

On Sun, Feb 04, 2001 at 04:23:07PM +1000, Robert Chalmers wrote:
> Just wondering - after hours and hours and hours - just how long 
> makeworld takes on a P233+128Mb  doing 4 -> 4.2  ( I hope?)

Is it still producing output?

On a machine like that, it should not really take too long.
-- 
Crist J. Clark                           cjclark@alum.mit.edu


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message