From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 11 03:13:58 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 521A2106566B; Mon, 11 May 2009 03:13:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from venture37@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f216.google.com (mail-fx0-f216.google.com [209.85.220.216]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 741668FC14; Mon, 11 May 2009 03:13:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from venture37@gmail.com) Received: by fxm12 with SMTP id 12so2445464fxm.43 for ; Sun, 10 May 2009 20:13:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=B+aULJHdxDywrpipzVxn6J6M4j8r0WqEQo4853eKGBA=; b=R/Kvy/DTJ/k4UfgZUC6hZK99kg6Toc5fwl053CacTcgA1/1X1Ck85cl+ksrC/8X7Z0 62H++MhO36KOb9ZiP3x86ABfiS1/jYc38+/43nvDXcsCgDGgxoDx830/FWvbCaijwT0O 8WnsY0cbYSYCDEN86wMNw6kaUHXO0457lGBHU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=p6VpKSHcYnh+IhzPT++yyXqEeX1JWJaJ0yQW5PlsqEq3yePj/UA24XcUNewP36Ggu/ +hZcRFgEyTUogi0lDRnLXPy9l8kGK3KTiPBT0zkNkoLLRXr+UK4ZQ33A1SOM+gCA2ufJ mkXzMPuXOxW4KKkudIzhBCHq/y3YRFB3/O2wo= Received: by 10.204.97.140 with SMTP id l12mr6295361bkn.133.1242009936696; Sun, 10 May 2009 19:45:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sevans-mac-pro.local (newbie.thingamajig-systems.co.uk [93.97.185.103]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c28sm6951568fka.2.2009.05.10.19.45.34 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 10 May 2009 19:45:35 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A07914D.8090706@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 03:45:33 +0100 From: Sevan / Venture37 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Macintosh/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <497E6AF6.8060802@gmail.com> <497E7714.4010201@gmail.com> <49815205.3020507@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <49815205.3020507@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OpenNMS 1.6.2 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 03:13:58 -0000 Port updated to v1.6.4 http://www.geeklan.co.uk/?p=132 http://www.geeklan.co.uk/files/opennms/opennms-164-freebsd-port.tgz Sevan / Venture37 From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 11 11:13:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A0BA1065694 for ; Mon, 11 May 2009 11:13:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tonix@interazioni.it) Received: from mx02.interazioni.net (mx02.interazioni.net [80.94.114.204]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B37798FC0A for ; Mon, 11 May 2009 11:13:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tonix@interazioni.it) Received: (qmail 12731 invoked by uid 88); 11 May 2009 11:13:26 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.200.240?) (tonix@interazioni.it@217.19.158.67) by relay.interazioni.net with ESMTPA; 11 May 2009 11:13:26 -0000 Message-ID: <4A080851.3090101@interazioni.it> Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 13:13:21 +0200 From: "Tonix (Antonio Nati)" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Questions on clustered FS + NFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 11:13:39 -0000 I'd love to put all my storage on a clustered NFS (with a ridondant iSCSI controller and storage), FreeBSD based of course, but I see there is not any clustered FS on FreeBSD. So, the solution seems to run a couple of GFS or OCFS2 on some Linux servers, more some NFS servers handled by heartbeat. Is there any FreeBSD solution I could adopt? Thanks, Tonino -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Inter@zioni Interazioni di Antonio Nati http://www.interazioni.it tonix@interazioni.it ------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 11 11:30:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4DC010656A8 for ; Mon, 11 May 2009 11:30:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tonix@interazioni.it) Received: from mx02.interazioni.net (mx02.interazioni.net [80.94.114.204]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 178EA8FC28 for ; Mon, 11 May 2009 11:30:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tonix@interazioni.it) Received: (qmail 17673 invoked by uid 88); 11 May 2009 11:30:35 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.200.240?) (tonix@interazioni.it@217.19.158.67) by relay.interazioni.net with ESMTPA; 11 May 2009 11:30:18 -0000 Message-ID: <4A080C45.7010003@interazioni.it> Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 13:30:13 +0200 From: "Tonix (Antonio Nati)" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org References: <4A080851.3090101@interazioni.it> <4A080927.2080307@eenet.ee> In-Reply-To: <4A080927.2080307@eenet.ee> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Questions on clustered FS + NFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 11:30:37 -0000 Joel Jans ha scritto: > Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: >> I'd love to put all my storage on a clustered NFS (with a ridondant >> iSCSI controller and storage), FreeBSD based of course, but I see >> there is not any clustered FS on FreeBSD. >> >> So, the solution seems to run a couple of GFS or OCFS2 on some Linux >> servers, more some NFS servers handled by heartbeat. >> >> Is there any FreeBSD solution I could adopt? >> > > Glusterfs, http://www.gluster.org/docs/index.php/GlusterFS > http://www.freebsdwiki.net/index.php/GlusterFS > > Joel Jans > > GlusterFS looks to be a distribuited FS. What I need is to have two/three servers which are mounting in read/write exactly the same storage (an external iSCSI subsystem), exactly like wonderful old VMS did, or like GFS or OCFS2 seems to do now. Both servers must mount the same iSCSI partitions, so they work on the same data. Tonino -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Inter@zioni Interazioni di Antonio Nati http://www.interazioni.it tonix@interazioni.it ------------------------------------------------------------ From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 11 11:33:00 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F8841065673 for ; Mon, 11 May 2009 11:33:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joel.jans@eenet.ee) Received: from muheleja.eenet.ee (muheleja.eenet.ee [193.40.0.132]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D3098FC15 for ; Mon, 11 May 2009 11:33:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from joel.jans@eenet.ee) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.eenet.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id 045251CC20; Mon, 11 May 2009 14:16:58 +0300 (EEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at eenet.ee Received: from muheleja.eenet.ee ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (muheleja.eenet.ee [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dT9AzgPrg7K8; Mon, 11 May 2009 14:16:55 +0300 (EEST) Received: from [193.40.0.237] (kurjaja.eenet.ee [193.40.0.237]) by muheleja.eenet.ee (Postfix) with ESMTP id A66E41CC09; Mon, 11 May 2009 14:16:55 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <4A080927.2080307@eenet.ee> Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 14:16:55 +0300 From: Joel Jans User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090113) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Tonix (Antonio Nati)" References: <4A080851.3090101@interazioni.it> In-Reply-To: <4A080851.3090101@interazioni.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Questions on clustered FS + NFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 11:33:00 -0000 Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: > I'd love to put all my storage on a clustered NFS (with a ridondant > iSCSI controller and storage), FreeBSD based of course, but I see > there is not any clustered FS on FreeBSD. > > So, the solution seems to run a couple of GFS or OCFS2 on some Linux > servers, more some NFS servers handled by heartbeat. > > Is there any FreeBSD solution I could adopt? > Glusterfs, http://www.gluster.org/docs/index.php/GlusterFS http://www.freebsdwiki.net/index.php/GlusterFS Joel Jans From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 11 21:46:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD2BD106564A for ; Mon, 11 May 2009 21:46:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john@day-light.com) Received: from joseph.day-light.net (gabriel.day-light.net [209.145.160.141]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 853C28FC0C for ; Mon, 11 May 2009 21:46:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john@day-light.com) Received: from ws1 (unknown [10.1.5.67]) by joseph.day-light.net (Postfix) with SMTP id C33C645018 for ; Mon, 11 May 2009 16:27:01 -0500 (CDT) From: "John Brooks" To: Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 16:26:59 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5579 In-Reply-To: <49F83388.80305@unsane.co.uk> Importance: Normal Subject: Compaq Proliant 1600 X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: john@day-light.com List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 21:46:15 -0000 I seem to have inherited a pair of Compaq Proliant 1600 servers and am considering loading freebsd onto them. Has anyone worked with Proliants before and specifically with installing freebsd on them? Is it worth the bother? -- John Brooks john@day-light.com From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 11 22:03:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86F7A106566C for ; Mon, 11 May 2009 22:03:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tibor@tibor.org) Received: from alpha.tibor.org (66-230-99-2.static.acsalaska.net [66.230.99.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 381748FC16 for ; Mon, 11 May 2009 22:03:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tibor@tibor.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpha.tibor.org (8.14.2/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n4BM3bUN078619 for ; Mon, 11 May 2009 14:03:37 -0800 (AKDT) (envelope-from tibor@tibor.org) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 14:03:37 -0800 (AKDT) From: Mike Tibor To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20090511140055.G78105@alpha.tibor.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (alpha.tibor.org [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 11 May 2009 14:03:37 -0800 (AKDT) Subject: Re: Compaq Proliant 1600 X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 22:03:38 -0000 I've loaded 4.x and 6.x on Compaqs in the past. I don't recall which models, specifically, but I don't recall running into anything out of the ordinary. All were SCSI rackmount boxes, and at least two had RAID controllers installed which FreeBSD recognized and used just fine. Mike On Mon, 11 May 2009, John Brooks wrote: > I seem to have inherited a pair of Compaq Proliant 1600 > servers and am considering loading freebsd onto them. > > Has anyone worked with Proliants before and specifically > with installing freebsd on them? Is it worth the bother? > > -- > John Brooks > john@day-light.com > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-isp@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-isp > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-isp-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 11 22:05:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67838106566B for ; Mon, 11 May 2009 22:05:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BA258FC13 for ; Mon, 11 May 2009 22:05:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41]) by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE5BF342261; Mon, 11 May 2009 17:50:05 -0400 (EDT) Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 11 May 2009 17:50:05 -0400 X-Sasl-enc: jh53kP1Jat97TNZDdi8tMN+oXfQ+/z2t4MAA1t9qZnzr 1242078605 Received: from [10.0.1.7] (c-66-41-132-62.hsd1.mn.comcast.net [66.41.132.62]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5D04E112CD; Mon, 11 May 2009 17:50:05 -0400 (EDT) From: Josh Paetzel To: john@day-light.com In-Reply-To: X-Priority: 3 (Normal) References: Message-Id: <038FB70A-BAD9-4F38-BBFC-3ABE0DCB2F4D@tcbug.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.4) Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 16:50:04 -0500 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.4) Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Compaq Proliant 1600 X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 22:05:59 -0000 On May 11, 2009, at 4:26 PM, John Brooks wrote: > I seem to have inherited a pair of Compaq Proliant 1600 > servers and am considering loading freebsd onto them. > > Has anyone worked with Proliants before and specifically > with installing freebsd on them? Is it worth the bother? > > -- > John Brooks > john@day-light.com > I'd say they aren't worth the power to turn on. And probably the only versions of FreeBSD that would work on them well aren't supported these days anyways. You are talking about hardware that is like single or dual P3 - 500mhz or thereabouts right? Thanks, Josh Paetzel From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 12 00:18:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A645E106564A for ; Tue, 12 May 2009 00:18:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coco@executive-computing.de) Received: from mail.moehre.org (mail.moehre.org [195.96.32.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6167F8FC08 for ; Tue, 12 May 2009 00:18:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from coco@executive-computing.de) Received: from localhost (unknown [195.96.32.7]) by mail.moehre.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 870D14D444A; Tue, 12 May 2009 02:00:43 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -3.461 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.461 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, AWL=0.938, BAYES_00=-2.599] autolearn=ham Received: from mail.moehre.org ([195.96.32.7]) by localhost (mail.moehre.org [195.96.32.7]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Hm41+m3F3p3I; Tue, 12 May 2009 02:00:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.100.30] (p54B0F458.dip.t-dialin.net [84.176.244.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: coco@executive-computing.de) by mail.moehre.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7CDD4D4446; Tue, 12 May 2009 02:00:40 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4A08BC22.8050900@executive-computing.de> Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 02:00:34 +0200 From: Marco Steinbach User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: john@day-light.com References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Compaq Proliant 1600 X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 00:18:45 -0000 John Brooks schrieb: > I seem to have inherited a pair of Compaq Proliant 1600 > servers and am considering loading freebsd onto them. > > Has anyone worked with Proliants before and specifically > with installing freebsd on them? Is it worth the bother? We're running some DL380 G1 Models for various internal, low profile purposes. They're equipped with dual PIII 1GHz CPUs and about 1GB of RAM. We're booting off of the Compaq Integrated RAID Controler, and use gmirrored off the shelve SATA drives in the free bays with FreeBSD 6.3. Allthough I have no knowledge about the models you mention, a good start might be to get Compaq Rompaq media in order to bring up the firmware to the latest level. The next step would be to fetch Compaq SmartStart media, and see, what options these offer for your machines. I had one DL380 G1 rebooting randomly on any FreeBSD 6.x I tried, but the other ones are just humming along nicely on 6.3 with some jails running mostly what might be called a standard FAMP. I'm running hpasm 7.22 [1] on all of them. MfG CoCo [1] http://people.freebsd.org/~jcagle/ From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 12 01:12:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2387106564A for ; Tue, 12 May 2009 01:12:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nuintari@amplex.net) Received: from paulie.amplex.net (paulie.amplex.net [64.246.100.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E7528FC20 for ; Tue, 12 May 2009 01:12:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nuintari@amplex.net) Received: from localhost (tony.nfs1.amplex.net [172.16.50.254]) by paulie.amplex.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id n4C11fJ3042757 for ; Mon, 11 May 2009 21:01:41 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from nuintari@amplex.net) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amplex.net Received: from paulie.amplex.net ([172.16.50.253]) by localhost (tony.amplex.net [172.16.50.254]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id s3ygW+kXl3kQ for ; Mon, 11 May 2009 21:01:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from nympho.assylum.nuintari.net (64-246-119-90.assylum.nuintari.net [64.246.119.90]) (authenticated bits=0) by paulie.amplex.net (8.13.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n4C11HFd040778 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 11 May 2009 21:01:21 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from nuintari@amplex.net) Message-ID: <4A09029B.70300@amplex.net> Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 01:01:15 -0400 From: Mark E Doner User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090408) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Compaq Proliant 1600 X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 01:12:40 -0000 John Brooks wrote: > I seem to have inherited a pair of Compaq Proliant 1600 > servers and am considering loading freebsd onto them. > > Has anyone worked with Proliants before and specifically > with installing freebsd on them? Is it worth the bother? I have a 1600 with dual 1.5 ghz p3 procs, and a raid controller, that has run freebsd 6.1, 6.2, 7.0, 7.1, and now, 7.2. Never had a problem with the machine, everything on it simply works. Been a good box. From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Tue May 12 10:24:34 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E4F10656E0 for ; Tue, 12 May 2009 10:24:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markus@infocom.co.ug) Received: from maria.imul.com (maria.imul.com [41.222.0.61]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E12EE8FC0A for ; Tue, 12 May 2009 10:24:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markus@infocom.co.ug) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by maria.imul.com with esmtp (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id KJI3Y1-0003NY-DG for freebsd-isp@freebsd.org; Tue, 12 May 2009 01:32:25 +0300 Message-Id: <52E5887F-0B3A-4AD2-9736-467ABA60122C@infocom.co.ug> From: "Markus A. Wipfler" To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary=Apple-Mail-6--366543816; micalg=sha1; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v930.3) Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 01:32:24 +0300 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.930.3) X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Etinc & Freebsd retransmit problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 10:24:35 -0000 --Apple-Mail-6--366543816 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi all, we use the ETINC bandwidth manger running on freebsd 7.0. Our setup in a nutshell is: Clients--------FreebsdEtincBox------------ TranspartentSquidBoxes----------Internet. i am using etinc in bridge mode. I have a firewall rule on my external interface (fxp3) that should redirect http traffic to an external squid server: /usr/bwmgr/utils/bwmgr fxp3 -x 101 -name markustest -fw -o -dport 80 - saddr MYIPADDR -proxydev fxp3 -proxyaddr SQUIDMACADDR the http requets is correctly redirected to the proxy: squid log: TCP_MISS/200 6665 GET http://www.google.co.ug/ - DIRECT/ 74.125.39.105 text/html however the page fails to open and firefox displays below error: The connection was reset Running wireshark (on the machine that requested the webpage) to check for traffic on port 80 gives me the below output: 1 TCP Connection establish request (SYN): server port http 2 TCP Connection establish acknowledge (SYN+ACK): server port http 4 HTTP GET /HTTP/1.1\r\n 10 TCP Retransmission (suspected) 11 TCP Duplicate ACK (#1) 12 TCP Connection reset (RST) 13 TCP Connection reset (RST) 14 TCP Retransmission (suspected) ..... when i remove the etinc box between the squid box and the desktop everything works correctly: 1 TCP Connection establish request (SYN): server port http 2 TCP Connection establish acknowledge (SYN+ACK): server port http 4 HTTP GET http://www.google.co.ug/HTTP/1.1\r\n 18 HTTP HTTP/1.0 200 OK\r\n 18 TCP Connection finish (FIN) I opened a trouble ticket with etinc who promptly replied and informed me that etinc doesn't modify the tcp header at all. So my next step is to find out if the problem could be with the under lying OS. Any help is highly appreciated. -- Markus --Apple-Mail-6--366543816-- From owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 13 06:56:50 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64C8D106566B for ; Wed, 13 May 2009 06:56:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from link@ngc.net.ua) Received: from ex.volia.net (ex.volia.net [82.144.192.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B2CA8FC1D for ; Wed, 13 May 2009 06:56:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from link@ngc.net.ua) Received: from em.volia.net ([82.144.192.9]) by ex.volia.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1M3yLG-0000vj-1K; Tue, 12 May 2009 23:12:46 +0300 Received: from zigzagless.tailor.volia.net ([93.72.29.22] helo=[192.168.2.50]) by em.volia.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1M3yLF-000B00-SX; Tue, 12 May 2009 23:12:46 +0300 Message-ID: <4A09D839.9040908@ngc.net.ua> Date: Tue, 12 May 2009 23:12:41 +0300 From: Zinevich Denis User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090409) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Tonix (Antonio Nati)" References: <4A080851.3090101@interazioni.it> <4A080927.2080307@eenet.ee> <4A080C45.7010003@interazioni.it> In-Reply-To: <4A080C45.7010003@interazioni.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Volia-Original-IP: 93.72.29.22 Cc: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Questions on clustered FS + NFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-isp@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Internet Services Providers List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 May 2009 06:56:50 -0000 The same issue for me. I have SAN connected to 4 servers. I was searching for such fs for about a week several month ago. I have not found anything matching this task. What was close - CODA. Now i do not exactly remember why it was not suitable for me... If you found how to solve this question - mail me please, I`m very interested in it too. Link. Tonix (Antonio Nati) пишет: > Joel Jans ha scritto: >> Tonix (Antonio Nati) wrote: >>> I'd love to put all my storage on a clustered NFS (with a ridondant >>> iSCSI controller and storage), FreeBSD based of course, but I see >>> there is not any clustered FS on FreeBSD. >>> >>> So, the solution seems to run a couple of GFS or OCFS2 on some Linux >>> servers, more some NFS servers handled by heartbeat. >>> >>> Is there any FreeBSD solution I could adopt? >>> >> >> Glusterfs, http://www.gluster.org/docs/index.php/GlusterFS >> http://www.freebsdwiki.net/index.php/GlusterFS >> >> Joel Jans >> >> > GlusterFS looks to be a distribuited FS. > What I need is to have two/three servers which are mounting in > read/write exactly the same storage (an external iSCSI subsystem), > exactly like wonderful old VMS did, or like GFS or OCFS2 seems to do now. > Both servers must mount the same iSCSI partitions, so they work on the > same data. > > Tonino > >