From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 15 00:53:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07C391065672 for ; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 00:53:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=0836fa5682=johnl@iecc.com) Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [64.57.183.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC728FC13 for ; Sun, 15 Aug 2010 00:53:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 64464 invoked from network); 15 Aug 2010 00:27:02 -0000 Received: from mail1.iecc.com (64.57.183.56) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 15 Aug 2010 00:27:02 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=k1008; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=Md3HiZcyiYgNmOZZYESoEzX5VkRxvkI0b+VpJyjk2VA=; b=UtZyL69HxlAhOwe4qu/Wsyr4A4/YHSnAY6ggW7GSv6q4tMDsWZW0SxzLxh/zgGhvWcyv25zYztTPABVXY1wgXVendRMw2kIQ9nbzKmtyG/C09Kk6zXDulAlrNWETG8xbHIpuE7hm3KsrtQVD4FASrVB3uhm2WWLjGEbpnNTGVKU= Date: 15 Aug 2010 00:27:02 -0000 Message-ID: <20100815002702.71895.qmail@joyce.lan> From: John Levine To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20100814172307.035661065697@hub.freebsd.org> Organization: X-Headerized: yes Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: peter@vfemail.net Subject: Re: Open Mail Relay X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Aug 2010 00:53:45 -0000 >Is Abuse.net's test adequate to rule out an open mail relay problem? It's pretty thorough, and most MTAs have default configurations that don't permit relay, so it's much less of a problem than it was when I wrote the tester many years ago. I don't try to check for weak SMTP AUTH passwords, a hole that some spamware exploits, so if you do AUTH, it's conceivable that could be it. In your case, though, I would wait for the complainer to forward you a message or two with headers so you can figure out where is spam is coming from. Regards, John Levine, postmaster@abuse.net, http://www.abuse.net, Trumansburg NY abuse.net postmaster