From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 00:03:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11067106564A for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 00:03:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7D9C8FC0C for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 00:03:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-219-100.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.219.100]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 009FF3D826; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 02:03:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id o8Q03Sxx002084; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 02:03:28 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 02:03:28 +0200 From: Polytropon To: FreeBSD Message-Id: <20100926020328.0eb6af8c.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Carmel Subject: Re: Unable to access CDROM device to play music X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 00:03:31 -0000 On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 19:46:08 -0400, Carmel wrote: > On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 00:49:16 +0200 > Polytropon articulated: > > > Have you tried mounting using the ATAPI driver? > > > > # mount -o ro -t cd9660 /dev/acd0 /mnt > > > > Does this work for data CDs? > > I get this error message: > > mount_cd9660: /dev/acd0: Invalid argument This seems to show that there's no ISO-9660 file system on the (data) CD, or the session is not finished, or any other problem on file system level. Can you check % file - < /dev/acd0 % cdcontrol info Here's an example for the output for a data CD: % file - < /dev/acd0 /dev/stdin: ISO 9660 CD-ROM filesystem data 'FreeBSD_Install ' (bootable) % cdcontrol info Starting track = 1, ending track = 1, TOC size = 18 bytes track start duration block length type ------------------------------------------------- 1 0:02.00 57:57.56 0 260831 data 170 57:59.56 - 260831 - - And for an audio CD: % file - < /dev/acd0 /dev/stdin: ERROR: cannot read `(null)' (Invalid argument) % cdcontrol info Starting track = 1, ending track = 18, TOC size = 154 bytes track start duration block length type ------------------------------------------------- 1 0:02.00 3:31.03 0 15828 audio 2 3:33.03 2:52.67 15828 12967 audio ... 17 52:24.53 7:27.30 235703 33555 audio 18 59:52.08 2:48.67 269258 12667 audio 170 62:41.00 - 281925 - - Do you get the same results for the respective CD content types? -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 02:09:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94AF21065672 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 02:09:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slowpoke@pathcom.com) Received: from esmtp09.pathcom.com (esmtp09.pathcom.com [209.250.157.153]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74DBA8FC15 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 02:09:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [216.249.8.46] (dial-0046.tor.pathcom.com [216.249.8.46]) by smtp-outbound04.tor.pathcom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6035D3000079 for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2010 21:50:21 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4C9EA6FF.4050204@pathcom.com> Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 21:50:55 -0400 From: victor kovacs User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100401 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 07:18:17 +0000 Cc: Subject: Free BSD 8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 02:09:55 -0000 It appears that all the distfile locations are empty. For example: KDE4 Master site: empty Distfiles: none Extract-only: empty Have the distfiles for the GUI been left out of the dvd? Same situation when 32 or 64 side of dvd is loaded. The dvd disk reader is read only. It cannot write to disk. Please advise Victor From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 09:47:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B637106566B for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 09:47:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6F2F8FC08 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 09:47:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o8Q9llMD018478 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:47:47 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <4C9F16BB.1030603@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:47:39 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: victor kovacs References: <4C9EA6FF.4050204@pathcom.com> In-Reply-To: <4C9EA6FF.4050204@pathcom.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig18A0CEAB08CF2749E0B9A064" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,DKIM_ADSP_ALL, SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Free BSD 8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 09:47:53 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig18A0CEAB08CF2749E0B9A064 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 26/09/2010 02:50:55, victor kovacs wrote: >=20 > It appears that all the distfile locations are empty. >=20 > For example: KDE4 >=20 > Master site: empty >=20 > Distfiles: none >=20 > Extract-only: empty >=20 That's deliberate. x11/kde4 is a metaport -- that is, it installs nothing itself, but exists only to hold dependencies on other KDE4 components. Installing x11/kde4 will trigger a cascading installation of the 20-odd other ports (as modified by your choice of options) that go to create a whole KDE system. > Have the distfiles for the GUI been left out of the dvd? >=20 > Same situation when 32 or 64 side of dvd is loaded. >=20 > The dvd disk reader is read only. It cannot write to disk. No -- the tarball of the ports in the distribution media is a faithful copy of the state of the ports tree at the time the media were created. Distfiles aren't included in FreeBSD DVD images -- there's only about 4.5GB to play with, and most of that is taken up by FreeBSD itself, and a selection of the most important software pre-compiled in pkg format. All of the distfiles or all of the pkgs for all of the ports together are substantially larger than any single piece of distribution medium (disk, USB key, etc.) readily available at the moment. Even just selecting the most commonly installed applications easily overflows the capacity of the DVD (and consider what invidious choices that selection process involves). Be aware that installing the ports tree from the DVD images is not the ideal way to do it. If you have the connectivity on your newly installed system, it is better to use either csup(1) or portsnap(1) to grab an up-to-date copy of the ports directly from the net. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig18A0CEAB08CF2749E0B9A064 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkyfFsMACgkQ8Mjk52CukIztcQCfYwz2Mdx5yjEi+Mt+8puv64vD MvkAn2kikfmrUPrjOsMLLWUvBX341d3o =TyNr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig18A0CEAB08CF2749E0B9A064-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 10:01:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65133106566C for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:01:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gulenler@boun.edu.tr) Received: from ispinoz.cc.boun.edu.tr (ispinoz.cc.boun.edu.tr [193.140.192.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8997A8FC08 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:01:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from saka.cc.boun.edu.tr (saka.cc.boun.edu.tr [193.140.192.9]) by ispinoz.cc.boun.edu.tr (Postfix) with SMTP id 25FFB66C866 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 12:46:47 +0300 (EEST) Received: (qmail 94723 invoked by uid 80); 26 Sep 2010 09:46:47 -0000 Received: from 192.168.243.3 ([192.168.243.3]) by horde.boun.edu.tr (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 12:46:47 +0300 Message-ID: <20100926124647.540139zgngv2jjbb@horde.boun.edu.tr> Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 12:46:47 +0300 From: Berk Gulenler To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-9; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.3.2) Subject: Page Fault While in Kernel Mode (IPNAT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:01:56 -0000 Hi, I have a firewall for NAT operations only. While doing NAT, server crashes. Below you can find the required info about my problem. Thanks. Some useful info about my NAT server: FreeBSD xxx.cc.boun.edu.tr 7.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE #2: Fri Sep 17 15:09:54 EEST 2010 xxx@xxx.cc.boun.edu.tr:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FW i386 bge0: mem 0xfdef0000-0xfdefffff irq 25 at device 1.0 on pci3 bge1: mem 0xfdee0000-0xfdeeffff irq 26 at device 1.1 on pci3 net.inet.ipf.ipf_natrules_sz: 127 net.inet.ipf.ipf_nattable_sz: 300000 513/897/1410 mbufs in use (current/cache/total) 512/540/1052/0 mbuf clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 512/512 mbuf+clusters out of packet secondary zone in use (current/cache) 0/5/5/12800 4k (page size) jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 0/0/0/6400 9k jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 0/0/0/3200 16k jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 1152K/1324K/2476K bytes allocated to network (current/cache/total) 0/0/0 requests for mbufs denied (mbufs/clusters/mbuf+clusters) 0/0/0 requests for jumbo clusters denied (4k/9k/16k) 0/5/6656 sfbufs in use (current/peak/max) 0 requests for sfbufs denied 0 requests for sfbufs delayed 0 requests for I/O initiated by sendfile 0 calls to protocol drain routines mapped in 183625863 out 126618997 added 2265807 expired 1350387 no memory 8899 bad nat 12314 inuse 13690 orphans 0 rules 49 wilds 0 hash efficiency 97.64% bucket usage 4.46% minimal length 0 maximal length 3 average length 1.024 TCP Entries per state 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 42 2236 51 417 3311 348 200 23 20 0 3763 729 Debug info: GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i386-marcel-freebsd"... Unread portion of the kernel message buffer: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 fault virtual address = 0x4 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x20:0x8593c94b stack pointer = 0x28:0x853488dc frame pointer = 0x28:0x85348958 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 25 (irq26: bge1) trap number = 12 panic: page fault cpuid = 0 Uptime: 2d0h6m24s Physical memory: 2035 MB Dumping 335 MB: 320 304 288 272 256 240 224 208 192 176 160 144 128 112 96 80 64 48 32 16 Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/acpi.ko...Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/acpi.ko.symbols...done. done. Loaded symbols for /boot/kernel/acpi.ko Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/ipl.ko...Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/ipl.ko.symbols...done. done. Loaded symbols for /boot/kernel/ipl.ko #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:196 196 __asm __volatile("movl %%fs:0,%0" : "=r" (td)); ####################################################################################################### #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:196 #1 0x80746017 in boot (howto=260) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:418 #2 0x807462e9 in panic (fmt=Variable "fmt" is not available. ) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:574 #3 0x8097483c in trap_fatal (frame=0x8534889c, eva=4) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:950 #4 0x80974aa0 in trap_pfault (frame=0x8534889c, usermode=0, eva=4) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:863 #5 0x80975459 in trap (frame=0x8534889c) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:541 #6 0x8095915b in calltrap () at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:166 #7 0x8593c94b in nat_new (fin=0x853489c0, np=0x855ee800, natsave=0x0, flags=Variable "flags" is not available. ) at /usr/src/sys/modules/ipfilter/../../contrib/ipfilter/netinet/ip_nat.c:2577 #8 0x8593cf04 in fr_checknatout (fin=0x853489c0, passp=0x85348a6c) at /usr/src/sys/modules/ipfilter/../../contrib/ipfilter/netinet/ip_nat.c:3828 #9 0x85959c6c in fr_check (ip=0x873c0810, hlen=20, ifp=0x855b7400, out=1, mp=0x85348ab8) at /usr/src/sys/modules/ipfilter/../../contrib/ipfilter/netinet/fil.c:2624 #10 0x859517be in fr_check_wrapper (arg=0x0, mp=0x85348ab8, ifp=0x855b7400, dir=2) at /usr/src/sys/modules/ipfilter/../../contrib/ipfilter/netinet/ip_fil_freebsd.c:178 #11 0x807f5708 in pfil_run_hooks (ph=0x80b026e0, mp=0x85348b44, ifp=0x855b7400, dir=2, inp=0x0) at /usr/src/sys/net/pfil.c:78 #12 0x8080ea72 in ip_output (m=0x85b2a800, opt=0x0, ro=0x85348b7c, flags=1, imo=0x0, inp=0x0) at /usr/src/sys/netinet/ip_output.c:443 #13 0x8080bb04 in ip_forward (m=0x85b2a800, srcrt=0) at /usr/src/sys/netinet/ip_input.c:1366 #14 0x8080d0b0 in ip_input (m=0x85b2a800) at /usr/src/sys/netinet/ip_input.c:609 #15 0x807f3ea5 in netisr_dispatch (num=2, m=0x85b2a800) at /usr/src/sys/net/netisr.c:185 #16 0x807e7b51 in ether_demux (ifp=0x855b7400, m=0x85b2a800) at /usr/src/sys/net/if_ethersubr.c:834 #17 0x807e7f43 in ether_input (ifp=0x855b7400, m=0x85b2a800) at /usr/src/sys/net/if_ethersubr.c:692 #18 0x80529582 in bge_rxeof (sc=0x855c4000, rx_prod=317, holdlck=1) at /usr/src/sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c:3392 #19 0x8052b602 in bge_intr (xsc=0x855c4000) at /usr/src/sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c:3653 #20 0x8072285b in ithread_loop (arg=0x855b97a0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_intr.c:1181 #21 0x8071eff9 in fork_exit (callout=0x807226b0 , arg=0x855b97a0, frame=0x85348d38) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_fork.c:811 #22 0x809591d0 in fork_trampoline () at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:271 ####################################################################################################### 0x8593c94b is in nat_new (/usr/src/sys/modules/ipfilter/../../contrib/ipfilter/netinet/ip_nat.c:2577). 2572 nat->nat_ifps[1] = np->in_ifps[1]; 2573 nat->nat_ptr = np; 2574 nat->nat_p = fin->fin_p; 2575 nat->nat_mssclamp = np->in_mssclamp; 2576 if (nat->nat_p == IPPROTO_TCP) 2577 nat->nat_seqnext[0] = ntohl(tcp->th_seq); 2578 2579 if ((np->in_apr != NULL) && ((ni->nai_flags & NAT_SLAVE) == 0)) 2580 if (appr_new(fin, nat) == -1) 2581 return -1; -- Berk Gulenler System Administrator Bogazici University Computer Center Phone: +90 212 359 47 16 Fax: +90 212 257 50 21 E-mail: gulenler@boun.edu.tr From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 10:49:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D795B1065695 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:49:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr) Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CCD08FC08 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:49:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr [134.157.10.1]) by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.14.4/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id o8QAT049029736 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 12:29:00 +0200 (CEST) X-Ids: 165 Received: from niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr [134.157.10.41]) by parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34DD28A3AA for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 12:28:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: by niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (Postfix, from userid 2005) id 0F96740B6; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 12:30:19 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 12:30:19 +0000 From: Michel Talon To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100926123019.GA41450@lpthe.jussieu.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Miltered: at jchkmail.jussieu.fr with ID 4C9F206C.003 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)! X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 4C9F206C.003/134.157.10.1/parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr/parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr/ Cc: Subject: Re: Free BSD 8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:49:03 -0000 Matthew Seaman said > Be aware that installing the ports tree from the DVD images is not the > ideal way to do it. If you have the connectivity on your newly > installed system, it is better to use either csup(1) or portsnap(1) to > grab an up-to-date copy of the ports directly from the net. I disagree with that. You are supposing that newer is better, which is far from proven (in fact blatantly false in many cases). Another option is to install the ports tree from the DVD,and install corresponding precompiled packages from the DVD or otherwise the web, and *not* updating the ports tree. There is a lot to be said for this option, and many users will be happier doing that, at least people who want to use their machine and not spend their time upgrading, compiling and fighting bugs. -- Michel TALON From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 10:52:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99ED3106564A for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:52:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@magnesium.net) Received: from toxic.magnesium.net (toxic.magnesium.net [207.154.84.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 884388FC08 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:52:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by toxic.magnesium.net (Postfix, from userid 1070) id AC135DA8AB; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 03:20:18 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 03:20:18 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20100926102018.GA31513@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 21 of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Subject: mail problems.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:52:43 -0000 i spent entire day saturday getting my primary server up to date. unfortunately, no mail can get out..... maybe for days...... mail Can get in. anybody hv a clue so i can fix this next time i portupgrade??? gary ps: to polyt: no jttd-5 .... -- Gary Kline Seattle BSD Users' Group (seabug) | kline@magnesium.net Thought Unlimited Org's Alternate Email Site http://www.magnesium.net/~kline To live is not a necessity; but to live honorably...is a necessity. -Kant From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 11:19:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 117B31065675 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 11:19:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (asmtp2.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.249]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 955E18FC1D for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 11:19:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from asmtp2.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o8QBJ3qL027442; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 12:19:03 +0100 Received: from orange.esperance-linux.co.uk (80-45-152-196.static.dsl.as9105.com [80.45.152.196]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp2.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o8QBJ3AK027436; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 12:19:03 +0100 Received: by orange.esperance-linux.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DF2F233C3D; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 12:19:02 +0100 (BST) Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 12:19:02 +0100 From: Frank Shute To: jlalarcon@drivehq.com Message-ID: <20100926111902.GB41218@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> References: <20100925144202.GA94018@Endeavour.lordofunix.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100925144202.GA94018@Endeavour.lordofunix.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Face: *}~{PHnDTzvXPe'wl_-f%!@+r5; VLhb':*DsX%wEOPg\fDrXWQJf|2\,92"DdS%63t*BHDyQ|OWo@Gfjcd72eaN!4%NE{0]p)ihQ1MyFNtWL X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE amd64 X-Organisation: 'shute.org.uk' Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gnash version X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Frank Shute List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 11:19:34 -0000 On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 07:42:02AM -0700, jlalarcon@drivehq.com wrote: > > Hi, folks. > > I want to ask you wich version of gnash port is more modern, gnash-0.8.7_4 > or, maybe, gnash-devel-20100218_5... > > Is "safe" install the devel version?. It have more features than the > "stable" release?. > > Thanks you very much, in advance. > > Regards. > > Jose. > The devel version should be newer. It might have more features but it's likely to be less stable. It's safe to install but it might coredump but shouldn't crash your machine (although it might cause X to crash). Regards, -- Frank Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 11:43:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FACD106566C for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 11:43:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@hotmail.com) Received: from blu0-omc4-s4.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc4-s4.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C242C8FC1A for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 11:43:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU0-SMTP114 ([65.55.111.137]) by blu0-omc4-s4.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 26 Sep 2010 04:43:40 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [71.77.39.64] X-Originating-Email: [carmel_ny@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ([71.77.39.64]) by BLU0-SMTP114.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 26 Sep 2010 04:43:38 -0700 Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: carmel_ny@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E4850E54867 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 07:43:37 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 07:43:37 -0400 From: Carmel To: FreeBSD Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Face: 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 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Sep 2010 11:43:39.0044 (UTC) FILETIME=[0FA5DE40:01CB5D70] Subject: Re: Unable to access CDROM device to play music X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 11:43:41 -0000 On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 02:03:28 +0200 Polytropon articulated: > On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 19:46:08 -0400, Carmel > wrote: > > On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 00:49:16 +0200 > > Polytropon articulated: > > > > > Have you tried mounting using the ATAPI driver? > > > > > > # mount -o ro -t cd9660 /dev/acd0 /mnt > > > > > > Does this work for data CDs? > > > > I get this error message: > > > > mount_cd9660: /dev/acd0: Invalid argument > > This seems to show that there's no ISO-9660 file system on > the (data) CD, or the session is not finished, or any other > problem on file system level. Can you check > > % file - < /dev/acd0 > % cdcontrol info > > Here's an example for the output for a data CD: > > % file - < /dev/acd0 > /dev/stdin: ISO 9660 CD-ROM filesystem data > 'FreeBSD_Install ' (bootable) > > % cdcontrol info > Starting track = 1, ending track = 1, TOC size = 18 bytes > track start duration block length type > ------------------------------------------------- > 1 0:02.00 57:57.56 0 260831 data > 170 57:59.56 - 260831 - - > > And for an audio CD: > > % file - < /dev/acd0 > /dev/stdin: ERROR: cannot read `(null)' (Invalid argument) > > % cdcontrol info > Starting track = 1, ending track = 18, TOC size = 154 bytes > track start duration block length type > ------------------------------------------------- > 1 0:02.00 3:31.03 0 15828 audio > 2 3:33.03 2:52.67 15828 12967 audio > ... > 17 52:24.53 7:27.30 235703 33555 audio > 18 59:52.08 2:48.67 269258 12667 audio > 170 62:41.00 - 281925 - - > > Do you get the same results for the respective CD content types? I made some file permission changes, rebooted and made sure that the changes were static, and then ran a few test. The cdcontrol program will not play a CDROM although it claims it is. I can play an audio CD from within KDE; however, it is like pulling teeth to accomplish it. Way too much trouble. MPlayer cannot access the audio CD naively. DATA CDs are another story. I cannot mount them. Using a data CD: # file - < /dev/acd0 /dev/stdin: ERROR: cannot read `(null)' (Input/output error) # file - < /dev/cd0 /dev/stdin: ERROR: cannot read `(null)' (Invalid argument) # cdcontrol info cdcontrol: getting toc header: Invalid argument cdcontrol: Invalid argument With an audio CD: # file - < /dev/acd0 /dev/stdin: ERROR: cannot read `(null)' (Invalid argument) # file - < /dev/cd0 /dev/stdin: ERROR: cannot read `(null)' (Device not configured) # cdcontrol info Starting track = 1, ending track = 3, TOC size = 34 bytes track start duration block length type ------------------------------------------------- 1 0:02.00 6:32.00 0 29400 audio 2 6:34.00 3:55.12 29400 17637 audio 3 10:29.12 3:42.23 47037 16673 audio 170 14:11.35 - 63710 - - Finally, just trying a mount command from the command line: $ sudo mount -o ro -t cd9660 /dev/acd0 /mnt mount_cd9660: /dev/acd0: Invalid argument $ sudo mount -o ro -t cd9660 /dev/cd0 /mnt mount_cd9660: /dev/cd0: Device not configured This is getting to be far more trouble and wasting way too much time than it is worth. I can just put the CDs in one of my Windows machines and then transfer the data over the network to the FreeBSD units. What is strange is that this use to work before I upgraded. By the way, Polytropon, please do not CC me. I am on the list and I really do not need two copies of every post. Others may appreciate it; however, I don't. -- Carmel ✌ carmel_ny@hotmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 11:51:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7132B1065672 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 11:51:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from faust64@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24D258FC17 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 11:51:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk34 with SMTP id 34so759049qyk.13 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 04:51:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=qg0OGc6BdaNp8xa5K7ZNnMhEZ0iLqCg8op17eUeka44=; b=PP3I423RP9971UrtmMmY4gwPY2qIdXp4BVuxZeiOfsc5yD7qed4tAwqj5g1W2tfHwT /X1YwqOz1xutkhxnjuaffjY7pEOjHR7Ps7kKfZhvbJ0CdaUnjVZaN/qpgVY53cjUYaDO 3h0bMtflW+7yYQhG5J0hz2RXLxAJmalLkxkeI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=ZlQfEL150IERcdIWpO9rJKgpLnfiM+gqqlB2sCqjLILY4XUxf8uaVrLi9ZdyD6S214 nHU9J3Nll5IlM/gU5tUfMEYv1PopCU68Mk8P5gDz7IWjWAVm9UM+H8tqdtiQvEXcY3FN KuACp7c+zjItx2erfWfo/se6mbpkZFHvVk+CY= Received: by 10.224.72.2 with SMTP id k2mr4277426qaj.242.1285501911092; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 04:51:51 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.187.212 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 04:51:20 -0700 (PDT) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Samuel_Mart=EDn_Moro?= Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 13:51:20 +0200 Message-ID: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: pf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 11:51:52 -0000 Hello, I'm trying to set up pf on my soon-to-be new gateway (8.1-RELEASE amd64). I used the sample configuration file available on calomel After a few tests, it appears that the gate has fully access to the internet, but I can't open connections from clients to distant servers (web= , ssh, ...). Checking pflog log file, I can't see anything about those timeouts, even if I added the log directive in every block/pass command. Everything else seems to work, I can talk with my DNS from the internet, ss= h redirections to another pc also seems to works. I just can't access the Internet from a client of my network... For debugging, I commented out the options and the 'block all in/out' directives. Here's my config file http://pastebin.com/Nim2zBCx Is there someone understanding what I'm doing wrong? Thanks for your help! Regards, Samuel Mart=EDn Moro {EPITECH.} tek5 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 12:01:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E7D1065698 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 12:01:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13BA78FC36 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 12:01:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gyg4 with SMTP id 4so1684444gyg.13 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 05:01:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.150.145.19 with SMTP id s19mr7325598ybd.276.1285502500176; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 05:01:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-071-077-039-064.nc.res.rr.com [71.77.39.64]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t2sm3777810yba.2.2010.09.26.05.01.38 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 26 Sep 2010 05:01:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: FreeBSD.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D2106E54867 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 08:01:36 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 08:01:30 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20100926080130.16a65c09@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20100926102018.GA31513@thought.org> References: <20100926102018.GA31513@thought.org> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=PGP-SHA1; boundary="Sig_/tVgbdrjnku8Chgg=.SWnQGZ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Subject: Re: mail problems.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 12:01:41 -0000 --Sig_/tVgbdrjnku8Chgg=.SWnQGZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 03:20:18 -0700 Gary Kline articulated: > i spent entire day saturday getting my primary server up to date. > unfortunately, no mail can get out..... maybe for days...... >=20 > mail Can get in. Sorry, crystal ball is out for repairs. Perhaps you could enlighten us with some pertinent log entries, MTA being employed, etc. If Postfix, provide output from the postfinger tool. This can be found at http://ftp.wl0.org/SOURCES/postfinger. If the problem is SASL related, consider including the output from the saslfinger tool. This can be found at http://postfix.state-of-mind.de/patrick.koetter/saslfinger/. If the problem is about too much mail in the queue, consider including output from the qshape tool, as described in the QSHAPE_README file. I cannot help you with other MTAs. --=20 Jerry =E2=9C=8C FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ --Sig_/tVgbdrjnku8Chgg=.SWnQGZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMnzYgAAoJEHdwsA8xwKhFs20H/jejDHiqWQPDONc3EF30CB2W WYVEixsDDdTDb0IzG0TjGLJymiOGrJ9iJidOTNcdPa8+LKlcNDjWaqFHtEiKvfpB +2TzqhIqEHOQVmd1Zj6lL/ADvtDJrB/Q3913+W5feXk8aV8pC1IBY2y3JCz8owGa aJJN8eriGiZNO0l9seTC9SUD2yZURllaKMSHmUkNHQYc75ggvytIC0Q7uKcvg/BW pnoU49YW7/n5d8e8binKNkAJQe0A0TV7+uI2t4VSWSNw/dummF41eIQrMRByy0Zd 0zHqEsqUifVE7g88rMDZd+cpyoHqkd09mzXzbMrvFKeHD4qO7pLmkMChJCPBhqQ= =UesL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/tVgbdrjnku8Chgg=.SWnQGZ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 12:25:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E99C106564A for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 12:25:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEAD28FC16 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 12:25:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o8QCPcgU020110 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 26 Sep 2010 13:25:38 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <4C9F3BBA.2060809@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 13:25:30 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michel Talon References: <20100926123019.GA41450@lpthe.jussieu.fr> In-Reply-To: <20100926123019.GA41450@lpthe.jussieu.fr> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigAF1F11DCE34514FA98363B17" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,DKIM_ADSP_ALL, SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Free BSD 8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 12:25:42 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigAF1F11DCE34514FA98363B17 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 26/09/2010 13:30:19, Michel Talon wrote: > Matthew Seaman said >=20 >> Be aware that installing the ports tree from the DVD images is not the= >> ideal way to do it. If you have the connectivity on your newly >> installed system, it is better to use either csup(1) or portsnap(1) to= >> grab an up-to-date copy of the ports directly from the net. >=20 > I disagree with that. You are supposing that newer is better, which is > far from proven (in fact blatantly false in many cases). Another option= > is to install the ports tree from the DVD,and install corresponding > precompiled packages from the DVD or otherwise the web, and > *not* updating the ports tree. There is a lot to be said for this > option, and many users will be happier doing that, at least people who > want to use their machine and not spend their time upgrading, compiling= > and fighting bugs. >=20 No. I made no comment on the relative advantages and disadvantages of various updating strategies. Please do not put words into my mouth. Given that the OP asked about the ports I think it fairly safe to assume that his intention was to use them. And, yes, being up-to-date with the ports tree generally *does* give you better results than not. Ports are a moving target, dependent entirely on upstream changes. Expecting that a snapshot taken months or weeks ago will work just as well as one updated in the last hour is plain daft. Even without any functional changes to the ported software, projects still move to different hosting, URLs change as archive sites are internally reorganised, ftp servers come and go, dist files get re-rolled with new checksums. Aside from those neutral changes, ported software generally does improve over time. Updates that fix problems are way more common that updates that introduce them. Despite a few high-profile occasions when things have gone horribly wrong -- not just with the ports, but with any OSS project --- this is overwhelmingly the case. The quality control in the majority of large OSS projects is very good nowadays -- probably better than their closed source equivalents. End users can quite reasonably expect not to have to spend their time "fighting bugs." Newer generally /is/ better. Besides that, the assumption you are making, that change is undesirable, is just plain wrong. People will always want new stuff. It may not be wise for them to get it, but that's another story. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigAF1F11DCE34514FA98363B17 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkyfO8IACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwd9ACfeN0+6L9dtHcUS8gcgEPyaLjr WIEAn3xdFITmhueBmMTY72U0yjL2aEhP =5RLp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigAF1F11DCE34514FA98363B17-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 13:32:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F5C1065679 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 13:32:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FB058FC16 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 13:32:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OzrKx-0006NE-3z for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:32:15 +0200 Received: from pool-173-79-85-36.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([173.79.85.36]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:32:15 +0200 Received: from nightrecon by pool-173-79-85-36.washdc.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:32:15 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Followup-To: gmane.os.freebsd.questions Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 09:34:46 -0400 Lines: 37 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-173-79-85-36.washdc.fios.verizon.net Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 13:32:17 -0000 Samuel Martín Moro wrote: > Hello, > > > I'm trying to set up pf on my soon-to-be new gateway (8.1-RELEASE amd64). > I used the sample configuration file available on > calomel > After a few tests, it appears that the gate has fully access to the > internet, but I can't open connections from clients to distant servers > (web, ssh, ...). > Checking pflog log file, I can't see anything about those timeouts, even > if I added the log directive in every block/pass command. > Everything else seems to work, I can talk with my DNS from the internet, > ssh redirections to another pc also seems to works. > I just can't access the Internet from a client of my network... > > For debugging, I commented out the options and the 'block all in/out' > directives. > > Here's my config file http://pastebin.com/Nim2zBCx > > Is there someone understanding what I'm doing wrong? > The firewall ruleset is a trifle overly complex for a quick glance; study and analysis would take some doing. However, if you can reach the internet from the firewall box and other client computers behind your NAT can't (which is what it sounds like you're describing) it may be just that you are missing gateway_enable="YES" in your /etc/rc.conf. Turning this "ON" makes your firewall box into a router. The status of this can be checked with: sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding - a "0" means no gateway and a "1" means gateway. -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 14:05:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1233) id 316281065674; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 14:05:23 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 14:05:23 +0000 From: Alexander Best To: David DEMELIER Message-ID: <20100926140523.GA40380@freebsd.org> References: <20100917003838.GA67783@freebsd.org> <20100921000624.GA86577@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: make buildkernel pre-build too long X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 14:05:23 -0000 On Tue Sep 21 10, David DEMELIER wrote: > 2010/9/21 Alexander Best : > > On Fri Sep 17 10, David DEMELIER wrote: > >> 2010/9/17 Alexander Best : > >> > On Thu Sep 16 10, David DEMELIER wrote: > >> >> Hi there, > >> >> > >> >> I can't understand why this part of make buildkernel is so long on my > >> >> amd64 machine (8.1-R) > >> >> > >> >> make -V CFILES -V SYSTEM_CFILES -V GEN_CFILES |  MKDEP_CPP="cc -E" > >> >> CC="cc" xargs mkdep -a -f .newdep -O2 -frename-registers -pipe > >> >> -fno-strict-aliasing  -std=c99  -Wall -Wredundant-decls > >> >> -Wnested-externs -Wstrict-prototypes  -Wmissing-prototypes > >> >> -Wpointer-arith -Winline -Wcast-qual  -Wundef -Wno-pointer-sign > >> >> -fformat-extensions -nostdinc  -I. -I/usr/src/sys > >> >> -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/altq -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/ipfilter > >> >> -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/pf -I/usr/src/sys/dev/ath > >> >> -I/usr/src/sys/dev/ath/ath_hal -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/ngatm > >> >> -I/usr/src/sys/dev/twa -I/usr/src/sys/gnu/fs/xfs/FreeBSD > >> >> -I/usr/src/sys/gnu/fs/xfs/FreeBSD/support -I/usr/src/sys/gnu/fs/xfs > >> >> -I/usr/src/sys/contrib/opensolaris/compat -I/usr/src/sys/dev/cxgb > >> >> -D_KERNEL -DHAVE_KERNEL_OPTION_HEADERS -include opt_global.h > >> >> -fno-common -finline-limit=8000 --param inline-unit-growth=100 --param > >> >> large-function-growth=1000  -fno-omit-frame-pointer -mcmodel=kernel > >> >> -mno-red-zone  -mfpmath=387 -mno-sse -mno-sse2 -mno-sse3 -mno-mmx > >> >> -mno-3dnow  -msoft-float -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables > >> >> -ffreestanding -fstack-protector > >> >> > >> >> This command takes around 5-6 minutes before continuing, on my i386 > >> >> machine (which is really old) it only takes about 20 seconds. The > >> >> kernel configs are almost the same for both machines. > >> > > >> > are there any differences in /etc/make.conf? > >> > > >> > cheers. > >> > alex > >> > > >> >> > >> >> Do you have any idea? > >> >> > >> >> Kind regards, > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> Demelier David > >> > > >> > -- > >> > a13x > >> > > >> > >> No, except the KERNCONF entry it's exactly the same : > > > > hmmm....strange. could you post the ouput of `make -VCFLAGS -VCOPTFLAGS` on > > both your machines, please? > > > > cheers. > > alex > > > >> > >> # General settings. > >> KERNCONF=Melon > >> MASTER_SORT?= .fr .uk > >> > >> # Portconf. > >> .if !empty(.CURDIR:M/usr/ports*) && exists(/usr/local/libexec/portconf) > >> _PORTCONF!=/usr/local/libexec/portconf > >> .for i in ${_PORTCONF:S/|/ /g} > >> ${i:S/%/ /g} > >> .endfor > >> .endif > >> > >> # Perl. > >> PERL_VERSION=5.10.1 > >> > >> # No need modules. > >> NO_MODULES=yes > >> > >> # Specify other directories. > >> WRKDIRPREFIX=   /usr/obj > >> DISTDIR=        /usr/distfiles > >> > >> -- > >> Demelier David > > > > -- > > a13x > > > > -O2 -pipe > > I think the problem is the amd64 architecture. When I buildkernel > using TARGET_ARCH=i386 it takes only one minute or even less, it's > only native target (amd64) which is long. i'll try to cross build a kernel for i386 (i686) and see if that shortens the build time on my pc, too. you might want to consider aksing this question again on freebsd-current@ or freebsd-amd64@. not too many developers read freebsd-questions@. cheers. alex > > Kind regards, > > -- > Demelier David -- a13x From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 15:44:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE3FF106564A; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:44:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from faust64@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 569EC8FC12; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:44:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwd6 with SMTP id 6so2701670qwd.13 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 08:44:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=s0WqTgUJHdjYsVPk9Ijon1lgE1aMHpsAoWM65YBoULA=; b=t/3tv+qyjd+SAe4RYNjH2I+B+2JAhjtql1PpBDtIGoYg5a4h4utfhyyixYWcNt9+L7 OKyFFmye5YWID9WHJxkFT5dj0P3EE+oJzy1alajhU/gu1LvgZD0KkRw+SmDri9oRXsaa MeoWdrdsBdd9AGeva+AE7eNXR6Rj8CXHmwOwo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=dKh1toHX0/QuR3urcuPbK6RKLtPgLoTfgLV6EhF0DGUBWiUZugqiJtF5f3956F+11I zGh3CNCYlZ3sL2ivGPrr/XRVAE/JtFxPeOUzT+Orw7rpNzvd5TRRjaJL1E/jOCsXYtWK FheM4v4+DKS+MR7BLVWk4XoB9EI/yZV7hI2dU= Received: by 10.229.11.27 with SMTP id r27mr4575197qcr.294.1285515844383; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 08:44:04 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.187.212 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 08:43:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Samuel_Mart=EDn_Moro?= Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:43:33 +0200 Message-ID: To: Michael Powell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:44:05 -0000 On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Michael Powell wro= te: > Samuel Mart=EDn Moro wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I'm trying to set up pf on my soon-to-be new gateway (8.1-RELEASE amd64= ). > > I used the sample configuration file available on > > calomel > > After a few tests, it appears that the gate has fully access to the > > internet, but I can't open connections from clients to distant servers > > (web, ssh, ...). > > Checking pflog log file, I can't see anything about those timeouts, eve= n > > if I added the log directive in every block/pass command. > > Everything else seems to work, I can talk with my DNS from the internet= , > > ssh redirections to another pc also seems to works. > > I just can't access the Internet from a client of my network... > > > > For debugging, I commented out the options and the 'block all in/out' > > directives. > > > > Here's my config file http://pastebin.com/Nim2zBCx > > > > Is there someone understanding what I'm doing wrong? > > > The firewall ruleset is a trifle overly complex for a quick glance; study > and analysis would take some doing. However, if you can reach the interne= t > from the firewall box and other client computers behind your NAT can't > (which is what it sounds like you're describing) it may be just that you > are > missing gateway_enable=3D"YES" in your /etc/rc.conf. > > Turning this "ON" makes your firewall box into a router. The status of th= is > can be checked with: sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding - a "0" means no > gateway > and a "1" means gateway. > > -Mike > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > the gateway is already enabled (and forwarding is correctly set) whatever, I had to do quick, I started again I think the missing thing on my old conf was the 'scrub' (at least) I made a more simple configuration, as following: ext_if=3D"bge0" int_if=3D"bge1" localnet =3D $int_if:network emma=3D"10.242.42.200" alpha=3D"10.42.42.42" delta=3D"10.42.42.44" set skip on lo0 scrub in on $ext_if all fragment reassemble #INTERNETZ nat on $ext_if from $localnet to any -> ($ext_if) #EMMA rdr on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to ($ext_if) port 1101 -> $emma port 22 rdr on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to ($ext_if) port 307 -> $emma port 80 #WHAT.CD rdr on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to ($ext_if) port 1666 -> $alpha port 1666 #REMOTE ADM rdr on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to ($ext_if) port 1667 -> $delta port 22 rdr on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to ($ext_if) port 1668 -> $alpha port 22 pass in log on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to $ext_if port 22 pass in log on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to $ext_if port 53 pass in log on $ext_if inet proto udp from any to $ext_if port 53 pass in log on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to $ext_if port 1664 pass in log on $int_if inet proto tcp from any to any pass in log on $int_if inet proto udp from any to any block in log on $ext_if inet proto icmp from any to $ext_if it's basically working i'll stuff it when I'll have time. Samuel Mart=EDn Moro {EPITECH.} tek5 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 15:53:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FECB106566C for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:53:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ryan.coleman@cwis.biz) Received: from qmta01.westchester.pa.hmc1.comcast.net (qmta01.westchester.pa.hmc1.comcast.net [76.96.53.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 242D18FC0A for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:53:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta01.westchester.pa.hmc1.comcast.net ([76.96.53.6]) by qmta01.westchester.pa.hmc1.comcast.net with comcast id BTgV1f005082Dic01TtVcL; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:53:29 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.9] ([70.89.202.1]) by omta01.westchester.pa.hmc1.comcast.net with bizsmtp id BTtU1f00202K3z201TtVoo; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:53:29 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) From: Ryan Coleman In-Reply-To: <20100926080130.16a65c09@scorpio> Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:53:28 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <21C11047-4055-4389-9DF4-9D8EF7DB0270@cwis.biz> References: <20100926102018.GA31513@thought.org> <20100926080130.16a65c09@scorpio> To: FreeBSD X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Subject: Re: mail problems.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:53:30 -0000 I'd lay dollars to donuts that some service you are running (SASL, AV, = etc) is not running and it's hanging there. Have you looked at the logs? = Or done a verbose mailing to yourself? Your MTA should have a stuck = queue list and reasons why for you. -- Ryan On Sep 26, 2010, at 7:01 AM, Jerry wrote: > On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 03:20:18 -0700 > Gary Kline articulated: >=20 >> i spent entire day saturday getting my primary server up to date. >> unfortunately, no mail can get out..... maybe for days...... >>=20 >> mail Can get in. >=20 > Sorry, crystal ball is out for repairs. Perhaps you could enlighten us > with some pertinent log entries, MTA being employed, etc. If Postfix, > provide output from the postfinger tool. This can be found at > http://ftp.wl0.org/SOURCES/postfinger. If the problem is SASL related, > consider including the output from the saslfinger tool. This can be > found at http://postfix.state-of-mind.de/patrick.koetter/saslfinger/. > If the problem is about too much mail in the queue, consider including > output from the qshape tool, as described in the QSHAPE_README file. I > cannot help you with other MTAs. >=20 > --=20 > Jerry =E2=9C=8C > FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net >=20 > Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. > Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. > __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 16:29:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24677106564A for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:29:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from mail.nagual.nl (524948AF.cm-4-2b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [82.73.72.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CFD38FC0A for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:29:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.11.34] (192.168.11.34) by westmark.nagual.nl (Axigen) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA id 287501; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 18:18:45 +0200 Message-ID: <4C9F74DD.6000009@nagual.nl> Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 18:29:17 +0200 From: Dick Hoogendijk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; nl; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AxigenSpam-Level: 4 X-AxigenVirus-Level: 1 Subject: port upgrading X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:29:13 -0000 I'm in doubt. I wanted to bring my ports collection uptodate, so I ran "csup -L 2 /root/ports-supfile" and that updated my ports collection. At least, I hope so. Then I started googling and found that cvsup is not recommended. Better tot use portsnap (???) And also portupgrade was a no go. I should be using portmaster. Woh, I'm confused now. Question: what is best used to have an up2date ports collection nowadays? This system is FreeBSD8/amd64. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 16:47:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE1D7106564A for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:47:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@insightbb.com) Received: from mxsf11.insightbb.com (mxsf11.insightbb.com [74.128.0.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC8C58FC13 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:47:31 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,239,1283745600"; d="scan'208";a="211896518" Received: from unknown (HELO asav02.insightbb.com) ([172.31.249.123]) by mxsf11.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 26 Sep 2010 12:47:30 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AldCAOIVn0xKgCiCPGdsb2JhbACHbYxHjgAMAQEBATUtw1iDDAqCLgQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,239,1283745600"; d="scan'208";a="387892599" Received: from 74-128-40-130.dhcp.insightbb.com (HELO laptop2.stevenfriedrich.org) ([74.128.40.130]) by asavout02.manage.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 26 Sep 2010 12:47:30 -0400 From: Steven Friedrich To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 12:47:29 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.1-RELEASE; KDE/4.5.1; i386; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201009261247.30582.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> Subject: sudo anomaly X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:47:31 -0000 I have a userID, admin, that I add to my systems to use when I perform system admin functions. I also use this ID when using X-windows, never starting X as root user. So I needed to check my mail for daily run outputs and so I tried to use su then mail, but I got admin's mail. So I exited su, and tried sudo mail. I got root's mailbox nd I deleted all but two emails. When I q(uit) mail, it said it saved 2 messages in mbox. But when I try to go back in it says I don't have any mail. There is no root directory in /var/mail. Did sudo lose my mbox? Can anyone verify this anomaly? -- System Name: laptop2.StevenFriedrich.org Hardware: 2.80GHz Intel Pentium 4 (HTT) with 2 GB memory OS version: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE i386 (6.9 MB kernel) manager(s): kde4-4.5.1 X windows: xorg-7.5 X.Org X Server 1.7.5 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 16:52:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2379B1065744 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:52:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@insightbb.com) Received: from mxsf11.insightbb.com (mxsf11.insightbb.com [74.128.0.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5CCB8FC18 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:52:14 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,239,1283745600"; d="scan'208";a="211898558" Received: from unknown (HELO asav00.insightbb.com) ([172.31.249.123]) by mxsf11.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 26 Sep 2010 12:52:14 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArcvAEsXn0xKgCiCPGdsb2JhbACiNAwBAQEBNS3DUIVEBIlO X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,239,1283745600"; d="scan'208";a="48940038" Received: from 74-128-40-130.dhcp.insightbb.com (HELO laptop2.stevenfriedrich.org) ([74.128.40.130]) by asavout00.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 26 Sep 2010 12:52:13 -0400 From: Steven Friedrich To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 12:52:13 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.1-RELEASE; KDE/4.5.1; i386; ; ) References: <201009111442.49114.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> <201009171218.38065.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> <1284874572.20540.1746.camel@predator-ii.buffyverse> In-Reply-To: <1284874572.20540.1746.camel@predator-ii.buffyverse> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201009261252.14140.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> Subject: Re: apropos returning same item twice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:52:15 -0000 On Sunday 19 September 2010 1:36:12 am Wayne Sierke wrote: > On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 12:18 -0400, Steven Friedrich wrote: > > On Thursday 16 September 2010 4:12:44 am Wayne Sierke wrote: > > > On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 18:27 -0400, Steven Friedrich wrote: > > > > On Wednesday 15 September 2010 12:39:15 pm Wayne Sierke wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 00:37 +0000, Alexander Best wrote: > > > > > > On Sat Sep 11 10, Steven Friedrich wrote: > > > > > > > Why does apropos list mysql(1) twice? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It doesn't return duplicates with apropos kde... > > > > > > > > > > > > maybe you have a gzip'ed and plain version in /usr ? > > > > > > > > > > > > see PR #4419. > > > > > > > > > > > > cheers. > > > > > > alex > > > > > > > > > > Are you certain that /etc/manpath.config doesn't just still > > > > > have /usr/X11R6/man configured (as well as /usr/local/man)? > > > > > Admittedly the kde issue is a mystery, assuming its manpages are > > > > > installed in /usr/local/man. This system has the following: > > > > > > > > > > OPTIONAL_MANPATH /usr/local/man > > > > > # (disabled by xorg-libraries port) OPTIONAL_MANPATH /usr/X11R6/man > > > > > > > > > > MANPATH_MAP /usr/local/bin /usr/local/man > > > > > # (disabled by xorg-libraries port) > > > > > MANPATH_MAP /usr/X11R6/bin /usr/X11R6/man > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is the whatis file being updated? Check the timestamp: > > > > > > > > > > # ls -l /usr/local/man/whatis > > > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 273178 Sep 11 04:22 > > > > > /usr/local/man/whatis > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wayne > > > > > > > > > > > > admin@laptop2(/dev/pts/1)/usr/home/admin 106% apropos mysql > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > > > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > > > I still have X11R6 in usr symlinked to /usr/local. This was done per > > > > entry 20070519 in /usr/ports/UPDATING. > > > > > > > > Do we still need this symlink? > > > > > > Yes, anything that references /usr/X11R6 gets directed to /usr/local. > > > > Well I temporarily removed it and this anomaly disappeared. Perhaps we > > just have to suffer until we know the symlink can be removed. I thought > > it was going to eventually be removed... > > > > > Did you check /etc/manpath.config and the timestamp > > > on /usr/local/man/whatis? > > > > grep -v '^#' manpath.config > > MANDATORY_MANPATH /usr/share/man > > MANDATORY_MANPATH /usr/share/openssl/man > > OPTIONAL_MANPATH /usr/local/man > > MANPATH_MAP /bin /usr/share/man > > MANPATH_MAP /usr/bin /usr/share/man > > MANPATH_MAP /usr/local/bin /usr/local/man > > OPTIONAL_MANPATH /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.12.2/man > > OPTIONAL_MANPATH /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.12.2/perl/man > > > > > Another check is that the output of manpath(1) doesn't > > > include /usr/X11R6/man. > > > > manpath > > /usr/share/man:/usr/local/man:/usr/local/kde4/man:/usr/share/openssl/man: > > /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.12.2/man:/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.12.2/perl/man > > Ok. There's also: > > %man -a -w mysql > > to see the origins of the multiple man pages, although it seems that you > may have already confirmed the /usr/X11R6 path connection. > > >From what you've presented so far I'd say it's looking like a problem > man -a -w mysql /usr/local/man/man1/mysql.1.gz /usr/X11R6/man/man1/mysql.1.gz > with updating of the "whatis" db files. So to verify whether the weekly > periodic "makewhatis" is being run:- > - check the timestamp on /usr/local/man/whatis - it shouldn't be more > than a week old > - check that the "weekly run output" report lists "Rebuilding whatis > database:" and that it doesn't list any errors, e.g.: > > Rebuilding whatis database: > > -- End of weekly output -- > ll /usr/local/man/whatis -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 369225 Sep 25 04:21 /usr/local/man/whatis I thn manually ran sudo makewhatis /usr/local/man without error. Anomaly still occurs. I'm not fully versed (yet) on makewhatis, but I think (from reading the description for the -a switch) that it is supposed to remove duplicate entries. -- System Name: laptop2.StevenFriedrich.org Hardware: 2.80GHz Intel Pentium 4 (HTT) with 2 GB memory OS version: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE i386 (6.9 MB kernel) manager(s): kde4-4.5.1 X windows: xorg-7.5 X.Org X Server 1.7.5 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 16:57:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 282551065673 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:57:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@insightbb.com) Received: from mxsf00.insightbb.com (mxsf00.insightbb.com [74.128.0.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E71578FC1C for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:57:26 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,239,1283745600"; d="scan'208";a="916266199" Received: from unknown (HELO asav03.insightbb.com) ([172.31.249.123]) by mxsf00.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 26 Sep 2010 12:57:25 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArcvAL8Yn0xKgCiCPGdsb2JhbACiNAwBAQEBNS3DUIVEBIlO X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,239,1283745600"; d="scan'208";a="165926289" Received: from 74-128-40-130.dhcp.insightbb.com (HELO laptop2.stevenfriedrich.org) ([74.128.40.130]) by asavout03.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 26 Sep 2010 12:57:18 -0400 From: Steven Friedrich To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 12:57:18 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.1-RELEASE; KDE/4.5.1; i386; ; ) References: <201009111442.49114.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> <201009171218.38065.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> <1284874572.20540.1746.camel@predator-ii.buffyverse> In-Reply-To: <1284874572.20540.1746.camel@predator-ii.buffyverse> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201009261257.18970.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> Subject: Re: apropos returning same item twice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:57:27 -0000 On Sunday 19 September 2010 1:36:12 am Wayne Sierke wrote: > On Fri, 2010-09-17 at 12:18 -0400, Steven Friedrich wrote: > > On Thursday 16 September 2010 4:12:44 am Wayne Sierke wrote: > > > On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 18:27 -0400, Steven Friedrich wrote: > > > > On Wednesday 15 September 2010 12:39:15 pm Wayne Sierke wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2010-09-14 at 00:37 +0000, Alexander Best wrote: > > > > > > On Sat Sep 11 10, Steven Friedrich wrote: > > > > > > > Why does apropos list mysql(1) twice? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > It doesn't return duplicates with apropos kde... > > > > > > > > > > > > maybe you have a gzip'ed and plain version in /usr ? > > > > > > > > > > > > see PR #4419. > > > > > > > > > > > > cheers. > > > > > > alex > > > > > > > > > > Are you certain that /etc/manpath.config doesn't just still > > > > > have /usr/X11R6/man configured (as well as /usr/local/man)? > > > > > Admittedly the kde issue is a mystery, assuming its manpages are > > > > > installed in /usr/local/man. This system has the following: > > > > > > > > > > OPTIONAL_MANPATH /usr/local/man > > > > > # (disabled by xorg-libraries port) OPTIONAL_MANPATH /usr/X11R6/man > > > > > > > > > > MANPATH_MAP /usr/local/bin /usr/local/man > > > > > # (disabled by xorg-libraries port) > > > > > MANPATH_MAP /usr/X11R6/bin /usr/X11R6/man > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Is the whatis file being updated? Check the timestamp: > > > > > > > > > > # ls -l /usr/local/man/whatis > > > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 273178 Sep 11 04:22 > > > > > /usr/local/man/whatis > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Wayne > > > > > > > > > > > > admin@laptop2(/dev/pts/1)/usr/home/admin 106% apropos mysql > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > > > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > > > I still have X11R6 in usr symlinked to /usr/local. This was done per > > > > entry 20070519 in /usr/ports/UPDATING. > > > > > > > > Do we still need this symlink? > > > > > > Yes, anything that references /usr/X11R6 gets directed to /usr/local. > > > > Well I temporarily removed it and this anomaly disappeared. Perhaps we > > just have to suffer until we know the symlink can be removed. I thought > > it was going to eventually be removed... > > > > > Did you check /etc/manpath.config and the timestamp > > > on /usr/local/man/whatis? > > > > grep -v '^#' manpath.config > > MANDATORY_MANPATH /usr/share/man > > MANDATORY_MANPATH /usr/share/openssl/man > > OPTIONAL_MANPATH /usr/local/man > > MANPATH_MAP /bin /usr/share/man > > MANPATH_MAP /usr/bin /usr/share/man > > MANPATH_MAP /usr/local/bin /usr/local/man > > OPTIONAL_MANPATH /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.12.2/man > > OPTIONAL_MANPATH /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.12.2/perl/man > > > > > Another check is that the output of manpath(1) doesn't > > > include /usr/X11R6/man. > > > > manpath > > /usr/share/man:/usr/local/man:/usr/local/kde4/man:/usr/share/openssl/man: > > /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.12.2/man:/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.12.2/perl/man > > Ok. There's also: > > %man -a -w mysql > > to see the origins of the multiple man pages, although it seems that you > may have already confirmed the /usr/X11R6 path connection. > > >From what you've presented so far I'd say it's looking like a problem > > with updating of the "whatis" db files. So to verify whether the weekly > periodic "makewhatis" is being run:- > - check the timestamp on /usr/local/man/whatis - it shouldn't be more > than a week old > - check that the "weekly run output" report lists "Rebuilding whatis > database:" and that it doesn't list any errors, e.g.: > > Rebuilding whatis database: > > -- End of weekly output -- I also tried, as root in a text console (not in X), makewhatis `manpath` and it complained that it already visited /usr/X11R6/man, but the duplicates still appear. -- System Name: laptop2.StevenFriedrich.org Hardware: 2.80GHz Intel Pentium 4 (HTT) with 2 GB memory OS version: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE i386 (6.9 MB kernel) manager(s): kde4-4.5.1 X windows: xorg-7.5 X.Org X Server 1.7.5 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 16:59:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3E151065674 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:59:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rg.lists@rzweb.com) Received: from flabnapple.net (flabnapple.net [216.129.104.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D50528FC16 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:59:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.1.15] (c-67-188-153-23.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.188.153.23]) by flabnapple.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id E3A831CC04A for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 09:44:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Ron Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 09:44:06 -0700 Message-Id: <271B9963-5384-4DB8-B0A8-A71B0F0326A7@rzweb.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078) Subject: Problems upgrading p5-IO-Compress X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:59:34 -0000 I went to upgrade my ports this morning and saw this: p5-Compress-Zlib-2.015 < needs updating (port has 2.030) (=3D> = 'archivers/p5-IO-Compress') p5-IO-Compress-Base-2.015 < needs updating (port has 2.030) (=3D> = 'archivers/p5-IO-Compress') p5-IO-Compress-Bzip2-2.015 < needs updating (port has 2.030) (=3D> = 'archivers/p5-IO-Compress') p5-IO-Compress-Zlib-2.015_1 < needs updating (port has 2.030) (=3D> = 'archivers/p5-IO-Compress') After reading CHANGES and UPDATING I did a portupgrade p5-* since there = were no specific instructions and I get this: =3D=3D=3D> Checking if archivers/p5-IO-Compress already installed =3D=3D=3D> An older version of archivers/p5-IO-Compress is already = installed (p5-Compress-Zlib-2.015) You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly. If you really wish to overwrite the old port of = archivers/p5-IO-Compress without deleting it first, set the variable "FORCE_PKG_REGISTER" in your environment or the "make install" command line. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/archivers/p5-IO-Compress. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/archivers/p5-IO-Zlib. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa = /tmp/portupgrade20100926-29184-lhtw7y-0 env UPGRADE_TOOL=3Dportupgrade = UPGRADE_PORT=3Dp5-IO-Zlib-1.10 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=3D1.10 make ** Fix the problem and try again. ---> Skipping 'archivers/p5-Archive-Tar' (p5-Archive-Tar-1.68) because = a requisite package 'p5-IO-Zlib-1.10' (archivers/p5-IO-Zlib) failed = (specify -k to force) ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) ! archivers/p5-IO-Zlib (p5-IO-Zlib-1.10) (unknown build = error) * archivers/p5-Archive-Tar (p5-Archive-Tar-1.68) If I try and run pkg_delete p5-IO-Compress-Zlib-2.015_1 it won't let me = because the package is in use.=20 How do I upgrade? Did I miss some obvious instructions? All UPDATING = says is: 20100921: AFFECTS: users of p5-Compress-Zlib, p5-IO-Compress-* AUTHOR: mm@FreeBSD.org The p5-Compress-Zlib, p5-IO-Compress-Base, p5-IO-Compress-Zlib and p5-IO-Compress-Bzip2 ports have been replaced by p5-IO-Compress. Users of Perl 5.10 and higher do not need to install this module because it is already included in the standard perl distribution. I tried following the instructions above about running make deinstall = and now I get: [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 238 packages = found (-1 +0) (...) done] Stale dependency: p5-Archive-Tar-1.68 --> p5-IO-Zlib-1.10 -- manually = run 'pkgdb -F' to fix, or specify -O to force. I've tried running pkgdb -F, but it is just asking my a lot of questions = like: Duplicated origin: archivers/p5-IO-Compress - p5-Compress-Zlib-2.015 = p5-IO-Compress-Base-2.015 p5-IO-Compress-Bzip2-2.015 = p5-IO-Compress-Zlib-2.015_1 Unregister any of them? [no] and I have no idea what the right answer is. I am running perl 5.8.9 and Freebsd 7.1 Any help is appreciated since I am completely lost. I've been freebsd = for many years on my personal server but never encountered a mess like = this before. Ron =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 17:05:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C556106566B for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:05:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 026D78FC18 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:05:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.erewhon.net (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr11.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o8QH5Vdh074117; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:05:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.erewhon.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id AAB00BA98; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:05:30 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:05:30 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Dick Hoogendijk Message-ID: <20100926170530.GA32854@slackbox.erewhon.net> References: <4C9F74DD.6000009@nagual.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4C9F74DD.6000009@nagual.nl> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: port upgrading X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:05:38 -0000 --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 06:29:17PM +0200, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > Question: what is best used to have an up2date ports collection nowadays? > This system is FreeBSD8/amd64. IMO if you don't mind compiling your own ports, use portsnap and portmaster. The sequence is like this; 1) Run `portsnap fetch update`, but see (a). 2) Read /usr/ports/UPDATING, and see if any additions to the top of the file apply to you. If so, take appropriate action. 3) If you have local patches to the ports tree, re-apply them if necessary. This is not really recommended but can be handy sometimes. 4) Run `portmaster -a -B -d` (a) When you run portsnap for the first time, or if you have damaged or deleted the contents of /var/db/portsnap, use 'portsnap fetch extract' instead. For me this is part of the weekly routine. Keep an eye on http://www.freshports.org/ to see if there are interesting changes for you. If you are upgrading to another major version of FreeBSD (say 7.x to 8.x), make a list of all used ports with `portmaster -l >ports.list`. Then delete all ports before updating the system. After the update, re-install the 'roo= t' and 'leaf' ports from ports.list. Hope this helps. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkyffVoACgkQEnfvsMMhpyWYGgCglYrer/HHnR8LzlrH8jdbXend L/IAn0AHp/UB+J75fI9a5vGw9ntNnCbN =vZ91 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MGYHOYXEY6WxJCY8-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 17:13:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AE9C1065670 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:13:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from igalgand@freemail.hu) Received: from mail01a.mail.t-online.hu (mail01a.mail.t-online.hu [84.2.40.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB68E8FC20 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:13:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freebsd02.snowboard.ice (dsl5402D0F9.pool.t-online.hu [84.2.208.249]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail01a.mail.t-online.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 42758797C6A for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 18:56:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from freebsd02.snowboard.ice (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebsd02.snowboard.ice (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o8QGQnwb010813 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 18:26:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from igalgand@freebsd02.snowboard.ice) Received: (from igalgand@localhost) by freebsd02.snowboard.ice (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o8QGQn5n010812 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 18:26:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from igalgand) Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 18:26:43 +0200 From: Istvan Galgand To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20100926162643.GA10795@freebsd02.snowboard.ice> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: rhythmbox issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:13:12 -0000 Dear All, I've just realized that I can't start Rhythmbox from my Gnome desktop. I've tried to launch it from menu, from terminal, nothing happens, no error messages appear at all. When I used Rhythmbox last time, lets's say, one or two weeks ago, everything was OK. First I was thinking of deleting all the files relating to Rhythmbox application found in my home directory but in the end I considered this action as an unadvised one, so didn't touch anything. Would you provide me with an idea how to start to fix the problem, please? Thanks, Istvan --- This mail was sent by Mutt-1.4.2.3_5, FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-#0, GENERIC i386 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 17:13:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D5651065679 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:13:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E46208FC16 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:13:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o8QHDjY1090869 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 26 Sep 2010 18:13:45 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <4C9F7F40.60407@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 18:13:36 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dick Hoogendijk References: <4C9F74DD.6000009@nagual.nl> In-Reply-To: <4C9F74DD.6000009@nagual.nl> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE8AC7BCD119119C371199CEB" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,DKIM_ADSP_ALL, SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: port upgrading X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:13:49 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE8AC7BCD119119C371199CEB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 26/09/2010 17:29:17, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > I'm in doubt. I wanted to bring my ports collection uptodate, so I ran= > "csup -L 2 /root/ports-supfile" and that updated my ports collection. A= t > least, I hope so. >=20 > Then I started googling and found that cvsup is not recommended. Better= > tot use portsnap (???) > And also portupgrade was a no go. I should be using portmaster. >=20 > Woh, I'm confused now. > Question: what is best used to have an up2date ports collection nowaday= s? > This system is FreeBSD8/amd64. csup(1) works fine and there's no good reasons not to use it. portsnap(1) also works fine, and there aren't any obvious problems that mean you shouldn't use it either. There is one somewhat subtle difference, which won't affect most people. 'portsnap extract' will blow away any custom files (Makefile.local, extra patches etc.) that you've added to the ports tree. csup(1) leaves them put. Obviously, either of the two methods will revert any modifications you've made to any files already known to be part of the ports tree. Once you've updated the tree, then you've got several choices for updating your installed ports. portupgrade(1) and portmaster(1) are the leading candidates there: portupgrade probably still has the edge on features, although development seems to be stuttering a bit recently. portmaster wins on simplicity -- it's a shell script with no other dependencies -- but still packs an awful lot of good stuff into approximately 3600 lines. Doug B is actively working on it and very responsive to bug reports etc. Really either of those two will serve you well, as will various others I haven't mentioned. Try them out, see which is most to your taste. There isn't any one 'best' solution that everyone is enjoined to use. That's not the BSD way: "Tools, not policy." There are several solutions that you can use, and it's up to you to select which one you prefer. Sure, people having strong opinions on the subject have posted their thoughts on various fora, but don't be misled: those are individual opinions, and not an official position. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigE8AC7BCD119119C371199CEB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkyff0kACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwYvgCfTmMx7IAobX6tbQgxH9wh7ngK xsUAnj9SeRSYN0dySbGNt7mWCDztcpIu =7tK1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE8AC7BCD119119C371199CEB-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 17:22:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 634F310656EE for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:22:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C278C8FC1C for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:22:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o8QHMEgV091019 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 26 Sep 2010 18:22:15 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <4C9F8146.8040707@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 18:22:14 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ron References: <271B9963-5384-4DB8-B0A8-A71B0F0326A7@rzweb.com> In-Reply-To: <271B9963-5384-4DB8-B0A8-A71B0F0326A7@rzweb.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig4679734BB16D84CFCC9AC384" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,DKIM_ADSP_ALL, SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems upgrading p5-IO-Compress X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:22:19 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig4679734BB16D84CFCC9AC384 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 26/09/2010 17:44:06, Ron wrote: > I've tried running pkgdb -F, but it is just asking my a lot of > questions like: >=20 > Duplicated origin: archivers/p5-IO-Compress - p5-Compress-Zlib-2.015 > p5-IO-Compress-Base-2.015 p5-IO-Compress-Bzip2-2.015 > p5-IO-Compress-Zlib-2.015_1 Unregister any of them? [no] >=20 > and I have no idea what the right answer is. >=20 > I am running perl 5.8.9 and Freebsd 7.1 >=20 > Any help is appreciated since I am completely lost. I've been > freebsd for many years on my personal server but never encountered a > mess like this before. Since you're running perl-5.8.9 you need to have p5-IO-Compress installed as a separate port. Try this: # portupgrade -o archivers/p5-IO-Compress -f p5-Compress-Zlib-2.015 # portupgrade -o archivers/p5-IO-Compress -f p5-IO-Compress-Base-2.015 # portupgrade -o archivers/p5-IO-Compress -f p5-IO-Compress-Bzip2-2.015 # portupgrade -o archivers/p5-IO-Compress -f p5-IO-Compress-Zlib-2.015_1 That should transfer all dependencies on p5-(IO-)?Compress-* onto p5-IO-Compress, which is the desired result. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig4679734BB16D84CFCC9AC384 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkyfgUYACgkQ8Mjk52CukIzWBwCcCT6lPwUwI+OWJ/+o1F/rFQHj EdoAn0D7GkVIqFFSJJcaYpnB04ze2AXT =eLDb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig4679734BB16D84CFCC9AC384-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 17:27:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 551CC1065670 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:27:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (asmtp3.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD1A78FC14 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:27:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from asmtp3.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o8QHR01I031871; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 18:27:00 +0100 Received: from orange.esperance-linux.co.uk (80-45-152-196.static.dsl.as9105.com [80.45.152.196]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp3.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o8QHR0ak031867; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 18:27:00 +0100 Received: by orange.esperance-linux.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 01A0533C3D; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 18:27:00 +0100 (BST) Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 18:26:59 +0100 From: Frank Shute To: Ron Message-ID: <20100926172659.GA42113@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> References: <271B9963-5384-4DB8-B0A8-A71B0F0326A7@rzweb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <271B9963-5384-4DB8-B0A8-A71B0F0326A7@rzweb.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Face: *}~{PHnDTzvXPe'wl_-f%!@+r5; VLhb':*DsX%wEOPg\fDrXWQJf|2\,92"DdS%63t*BHDyQ|OWo@Gfjcd72eaN!4%NE{0]p)ihQ1MyFNtWL X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE amd64 X-Organisation: 'shute.org.uk' Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems upgrading p5-IO-Compress X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Frank Shute List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:27:03 -0000 On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 09:44:06AM -0700, Ron wrote: > > I went to upgrade my ports this morning and saw this: > > p5-Compress-Zlib-2.015 < needs updating (port has 2.030) (=> 'archivers/p5-IO-Compress') > p5-IO-Compress-Base-2.015 < needs updating (port has 2.030) (=> 'archivers/p5-IO-Compress') > p5-IO-Compress-Bzip2-2.015 < needs updating (port has 2.030) (=> 'archivers/p5-IO-Compress') > p5-IO-Compress-Zlib-2.015_1 < needs updating (port has 2.030) (=> 'archivers/p5-IO-Compress') > > After reading CHANGES and UPDATING I did a portupgrade p5-* since there were no specific instructions and I get this: > > ===> Checking if archivers/p5-IO-Compress already installed > ===> An older version of archivers/p5-IO-Compress is already installed (p5-Compress-Zlib-2.015) > You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again > by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly. > If you really wish to overwrite the old port of archivers/p5-IO-Compress > without deleting it first, set the variable "FORCE_PKG_REGISTER" > in your environment or the "make install" command line. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/archivers/p5-IO-Compress. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/archivers/p5-IO-Zlib. > ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade20100926-29184-lhtw7y-0 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade UPGRADE_PORT=p5-IO-Zlib-1.10 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=1.10 make > ** Fix the problem and try again. > ---> Skipping 'archivers/p5-Archive-Tar' (p5-Archive-Tar-1.68) because a requisite package 'p5-IO-Zlib-1.10' (archivers/p5-IO-Zlib) failed (specify -k to force) > ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) > ! archivers/p5-IO-Zlib (p5-IO-Zlib-1.10) (unknown build error) > * archivers/p5-Archive-Tar (p5-Archive-Tar-1.68) > > If I try and run pkg_delete p5-IO-Compress-Zlib-2.015_1 it won't let me because the package is in use. > > How do I upgrade? Did I miss some obvious instructions? All UPDATING says is: > > 20100921: > AFFECTS: users of p5-Compress-Zlib, p5-IO-Compress-* > AUTHOR: mm@FreeBSD.org > > The p5-Compress-Zlib, p5-IO-Compress-Base, p5-IO-Compress-Zlib and > p5-IO-Compress-Bzip2 ports have been replaced by p5-IO-Compress. > Users of Perl 5.10 and higher do not need to install this module > because it is already included in the standard perl distribution. > > I tried following the instructions above about running make deinstall and now I get: > > [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 238 packages found (-1 +0) (...) done] > Stale dependency: p5-Archive-Tar-1.68 --> p5-IO-Zlib-1.10 -- manually run 'pkgdb -F' to fix, or specify -O to force. > > I've tried running pkgdb -F, but it is just asking my a lot of questions like: > > Duplicated origin: archivers/p5-IO-Compress - p5-Compress-Zlib-2.015 p5-IO-Compress-Base-2.015 p5-IO-Compress-Bzip2-2.015 p5-IO-Compress-Zlib-2.015_1 > Unregister any of them? [no] The answer is to run pgdb -F and unregister: p5-Compress-Zlib p5-IO-Compress-Base p5-IO-Compress-Bzip2 p5-IO-Compress-Zlib and you should be in the clear. > > and I have no idea what the right answer is. > > I am running perl 5.8.9 and Freebsd 7.1 > > Any help is appreciated since I am completely lost. I've been freebsd for many years on my personal server but never encountered a mess like this before. > > Ron > Regards, -- Frank Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 17:31:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC38106566B for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:31:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rg.lists@rzweb.com) Received: from flabnapple.net (flabnapple.net [216.129.104.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D02758FC08 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:31:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.1.15] (c-67-188-153-23.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.188.153.23]) by flabnapple.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7F3221CC049; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:31:34 -0700 (PDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Ron In-Reply-To: <20100926172659.GA42113@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:31:33 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <52AF6072-A015-4FDD-81B8-00F2C8DD0727@rzweb.com> References: <271B9963-5384-4DB8-B0A8-A71B0F0326A7@rzweb.com> <20100926172659.GA42113@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> To: Frank Shute X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems upgrading p5-IO-Compress X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:31:35 -0000 On Sep 26, 2010, at 10:26 AM, Frank Shute wrote: > On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 09:44:06AM -0700, Ron wrote: >>=20 >> I went to upgrade my ports this morning and saw this: >>=20 >> p5-Compress-Zlib-2.015 < needs updating (port has 2.030) (=3D> = 'archivers/p5-IO-Compress') >> p5-IO-Compress-Base-2.015 < needs updating (port has 2.030) (=3D> = 'archivers/p5-IO-Compress') >> p5-IO-Compress-Bzip2-2.015 < needs updating (port has 2.030) (=3D> = 'archivers/p5-IO-Compress') >> p5-IO-Compress-Zlib-2.015_1 < needs updating (port has 2.030) (=3D> = 'archivers/p5-IO-Compress') >>=20 >> After reading CHANGES and UPDATING I did a portupgrade p5-* since = there were no specific instructions and I get this: >>=20 >> =3D=3D=3D> Checking if archivers/p5-IO-Compress already installed >> =3D=3D=3D> An older version of archivers/p5-IO-Compress is already = installed (p5-Compress-Zlib-2.015) >> You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again >> by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly. >> If you really wish to overwrite the old port of = archivers/p5-IO-Compress >> without deleting it first, set the variable "FORCE_PKG_REGISTER" >> in your environment or the "make install" command line. >> *** Error code 1 >>=20 >> Stop in /usr/ports/archivers/p5-IO-Compress. >> *** Error code 1 >>=20 >> Stop in /usr/ports/archivers/p5-IO-Zlib. >> ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa = /tmp/portupgrade20100926-29184-lhtw7y-0 env UPGRADE_TOOL=3Dportupgrade = UPGRADE_PORT=3Dp5-IO-Zlib-1.10 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=3D1.10 make >> ** Fix the problem and try again. >> ---> Skipping 'archivers/p5-Archive-Tar' (p5-Archive-Tar-1.68) = because a requisite package 'p5-IO-Zlib-1.10' (archivers/p5-IO-Zlib) = failed (specify -k to force) >> ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) >> ! archivers/p5-IO-Zlib (p5-IO-Zlib-1.10) (unknown build = error) >> * archivers/p5-Archive-Tar (p5-Archive-Tar-1.68) >>=20 >> If I try and run pkg_delete p5-IO-Compress-Zlib-2.015_1 it won't let = me because the package is in use.=20 >>=20 >> How do I upgrade? Did I miss some obvious instructions? All = UPDATING says is: >>=20 >> 20100921: >> AFFECTS: users of p5-Compress-Zlib, p5-IO-Compress-* >> AUTHOR: mm@FreeBSD.org >>=20 >> The p5-Compress-Zlib, p5-IO-Compress-Base, p5-IO-Compress-Zlib and >> p5-IO-Compress-Bzip2 ports have been replaced by p5-IO-Compress. >> Users of Perl 5.10 and higher do not need to install this module >> because it is already included in the standard perl distribution. >>=20 >> I tried following the instructions above about running make deinstall = and now I get: >>=20 >> [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 238 = packages found (-1 +0) (...) done] >> Stale dependency: p5-Archive-Tar-1.68 --> p5-IO-Zlib-1.10 -- manually = run 'pkgdb -F' to fix, or specify -O to force. >>=20 >> I've tried running pkgdb -F, but it is just asking my a lot of = questions like: >>=20 >> Duplicated origin: archivers/p5-IO-Compress - p5-Compress-Zlib-2.015 = p5-IO-Compress-Base-2.015 p5-IO-Compress-Bzip2-2.015 = p5-IO-Compress-Zlib-2.015_1 >> Unregister any of them? [no] >=20 > The answer is to run pgdb -F and unregister: >=20 > p5-Compress-Zlib > p5-IO-Compress-Base > p5-IO-Compress-Bzip2 > p5-IO-Compress-Zlib >=20 > and you should be in the clear. >=20 >>=20 >> and I have no idea what the right answer is. >>=20 >> I am running perl 5.8.9 and Freebsd 7.1 >>=20 >> Any help is appreciated since I am completely lost. I've been = freebsd for many years on my personal server but never encountered a = mess like this before. >>=20 >> Ron >>=20 >=20 Excellent, this seems to have fixed it! Thanks! Ron > Regards, >=20 > --=20 >=20 > Frank >=20 > Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html >=20 >=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 17:50:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FC42106566C for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:50:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from mail.nagual.nl (524948AF.cm-4-2b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [82.73.72.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC63F8FC17 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:50:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.11.34] (192.168.11.34) by westmark.nagual.nl (Axigen) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA id 217F64; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:40:00 +0200 Message-ID: <4C9F87E8.5000502@nagual.nl> Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:50:32 +0200 From: Dick Hoogendijk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; nl; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew Seaman References: <4C9F74DD.6000009@nagual.nl> <4C9F7F40.60407@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4C9F7F40.60407@infracaninophile.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AxigenSpam-Level: 4 X-AxigenVirus-Level: 1 Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: port upgrading X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:50:50 -0000 On 26-9-2010 19:13, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Really either of those two will serve you well, as will various others I like portupgrade. One question about dependencies: if I want to update *one* port I have to run "portupgrade -R portname", right. But *when* do I run portupgrade -R ,name> c.q. portupgrade -rR ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 17:56:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D3F106566B for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:56:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@magnesium.net) Received: from toxic.magnesium.net (toxic.magnesium.net [207.154.84.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43B798FC15 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:56:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by toxic.magnesium.net (Postfix, from userid 1070) id DE9E6DA8AF; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:56:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:56:23 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Both , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Message-ID: <20100926175623.GA39340@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 21 of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Subject: hanging mail. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:56:22 -0000 Just a FWIW, the last time that mutt exited with a 127 error a friend from Dallas figured it out in about ten minutes. Something needed rebuilding. If we were chatting then I have the logs. but i inadvertantly removed my entire mail directory on ns1 [ethic]. gary PS: sendmail on my server, dovecot, Postfix on my desktop. Umm, no window manager on ethic. It's a server. What logs can I post? val/log/maillog is a zoo last time I chexked early this morning. ... -- Gary Kline Seattle BSD Users' Group (seabug) | kline@magnesium.net Thought Unlimited Org's Alternate Email Site http://www.magnesium.net/~kline To live is not a necessity; but to live honorably...is a necessity. -Kant From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 17:59:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDD931065670 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:59:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glimp@live.com) Received: from blu0-omc4-s8.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc4-s8.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 853B48FC08 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:59:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU0-SMTP126 ([65.55.111.135]) by blu0-omc4-s8.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:59:53 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [151.49.239.47] X-Originating-Email: [glimp@live.com] Message-ID: Received: from genki.collidiamo.net ([151.49.239.47]) by BLU0-SMTP126.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sun, 26 Sep 2010 10:59:50 -0700 Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:54:53 +0200 From: dan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100920 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <271B9963-5384-4DB8-B0A8-A71B0F0326A7@rzweb.com> <20100926172659.GA42113@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> <52AF6072-A015-4FDD-81B8-00F2C8DD0727@rzweb.com> In-Reply-To: <52AF6072-A015-4FDD-81B8-00F2C8DD0727@rzweb.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 26 Sep 2010 17:59:51.0895 (UTC) FILETIME=[9E1D9670:01CB5DA4] Subject: Re: Problems upgrading p5-IO-Compress X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:59:53 -0000 On 26.09.2010 19:31, Ron wrote: > > On Sep 26, 2010, at 10:26 AM, Frank Shute wrote: > >> On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 09:44:06AM -0700, Ron wrote: >>> >>> I went to upgrade my ports this morning and saw this: >>> >>> p5-Compress-Zlib-2.015< needs updating (port has 2.030) (=> 'archivers/p5-IO-Compress') >>> p5-IO-Compress-Base-2.015< needs updating (port has 2.030) (=> 'archivers/p5-IO-Compress') >>> p5-IO-Compress-Bzip2-2.015< needs updating (port has 2.030) (=> 'archivers/p5-IO-Compress') >>> p5-IO-Compress-Zlib-2.015_1< needs updating (port has 2.030) (=> 'archivers/p5-IO-Compress') >>> >>> After reading CHANGES and UPDATING I did a portupgrade p5-* since there were no specific instructions and I get this: >>> >>> ===> Checking if archivers/p5-IO-Compress already installed >>> ===> An older version of archivers/p5-IO-Compress is already installed (p5-Compress-Zlib-2.015) >>> You may wish to ``make deinstall'' and install this port again >>> by ``make reinstall'' to upgrade it properly. >>> If you really wish to overwrite the old port of archivers/p5-IO-Compress >>> without deleting it first, set the variable "FORCE_PKG_REGISTER" >>> in your environment or the "make install" command line. >>> *** Error code 1 >>> >>> Stop in /usr/ports/archivers/p5-IO-Compress. >>> *** Error code 1 >>> >>> Stop in /usr/ports/archivers/p5-IO-Zlib. >>> ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade20100926-29184-lhtw7y-0 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade UPGRADE_PORT=p5-IO-Zlib-1.10 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=1.10 make >>> ** Fix the problem and try again. >>> ---> Skipping 'archivers/p5-Archive-Tar' (p5-Archive-Tar-1.68) because a requisite package 'p5-IO-Zlib-1.10' (archivers/p5-IO-Zlib) failed (specify -k to force) >>> ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) >>> ! archivers/p5-IO-Zlib (p5-IO-Zlib-1.10) (unknown build error) >>> * archivers/p5-Archive-Tar (p5-Archive-Tar-1.68) >>> >>> If I try and run pkg_delete p5-IO-Compress-Zlib-2.015_1 it won't let me because the package is in use. >>> >>> How do I upgrade? Did I miss some obvious instructions? All UPDATING says is: >>> >>> 20100921: >>> AFFECTS: users of p5-Compress-Zlib, p5-IO-Compress-* >>> AUTHOR: mm@FreeBSD.org >>> >>> The p5-Compress-Zlib, p5-IO-Compress-Base, p5-IO-Compress-Zlib and >>> p5-IO-Compress-Bzip2 ports have been replaced by p5-IO-Compress. >>> Users of Perl 5.10 and higher do not need to install this module >>> because it is already included in the standard perl distribution. >>> >>> I tried following the instructions above about running make deinstall and now I get: >>> >>> [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 238 packages found (-1 +0) (...) done] >>> Stale dependency: p5-Archive-Tar-1.68 --> p5-IO-Zlib-1.10 -- manually run 'pkgdb -F' to fix, or specify -O to force. >>> >>> I've tried running pkgdb -F, but it is just asking my a lot of questions like: >>> >>> Duplicated origin: archivers/p5-IO-Compress - p5-Compress-Zlib-2.015 p5-IO-Compress-Base-2.015 p5-IO-Compress-Bzip2-2.015 p5-IO-Compress-Zlib-2.015_1 >>> Unregister any of them? [no] >> >> The answer is to run pgdb -F and unregister: >> >> p5-Compress-Zlib >> p5-IO-Compress-Base >> p5-IO-Compress-Bzip2 >> p5-IO-Compress-Zlib >> >> and you should be in the clear. >> >>> >>> and I have no idea what the right answer is. >>> >>> I am running perl 5.8.9 and Freebsd 7.1 >>> >>> Any help is appreciated since I am completely lost. I've been freebsd for many years on my personal server but never encountered a mess like this before. >>> >>> Ron >>> >> > > Excellent, this seems to have fixed it! Thanks! > > Ron > >> Regards, >> >> -- >> >> Frank >> >> Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Oh, here, I actually did not de-register anything. I first run pkgdb -F. It fixed something and I answer no to "unregister ...?". Then, after reading /usr/ports/UPDATING " 20100921: AFFECTS: users of p5-Compress-Zlib, p5-IO-Compress-* AUTHOR: mm@FreeBSD.org The p5-Compress-Zlib, p5-IO-Compress-Base, p5-IO-Compress-Zlib and p5-IO-Compress-Bzip2 ports have been replaced by p5-IO-Compress. Users of Perl 5.10 and higher do not need to install this module because it is already included in the standard perl distribution. " I manually checked any dependencies of the cited ports (p5-...) and de-installed the cited ports that were actually installed here and not required by any other port. Later pkgdb did not make complaints anymore. Is this procedure probably... wrong ? :-) As of my opinion unregister means "discarding information" but the ports are still installed and probably not used anymore. BUt just my opinion... d From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 18:21:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 010C3106566B for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 18:21:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@magnesium.net) Received: from toxic.magnesium.net (toxic.magnesium.net [207.154.84.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E44D68FC12 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 18:21:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by toxic.magnesium.net (Postfix, from userid 1070) id 824C6DA8AF; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 11:22:00 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 11:22:00 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20100926182200.GA40516@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 21 of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Subject: /var/log/maillog X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 18:21:59 -0000 Here is a snippet of maillog. mutt still exiting with an 'Exec Error' Sep 26 11:13:47 ethic dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=, method=PLAIN, rip=10.47.0.230, lip=10.47.0.230, TLS Sep 26 11:14:48 ethic dovecot: IMAP(kline): Connection closed bytes=824/490 Sep 26 11:15:07 ethic sm-mta[15070]: ruleset=check_relay, arg1=109.106.10.75.sumtel.ua, arg2=127.0.0.4, relay=109.106.10.75.sumtel.ua [109.106.10.75], reject=550 5.7.1 Rejected: 109.106.10.75 listed at sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org p1 11:15 [4598] anybody? -- Gary Kline Seattle BSD Users' Group (seabug) | kline@magnesium.net Thought Unlimited Org's Alternate Email Site http://www.magnesium.net/~kline To live is not a necessity; but to live honorably...is a necessity. -Kant From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 16:49:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EED00106566B for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:49:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@lecuire.fr) Received: from neutron.lecuire.fr (lecuire.fr [82.232.211.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA2EB8FC1C for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:49:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [192.168.0.50]) by neutron.lecuire.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B94A761C34 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 18:32:09 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4C9F7589.5090707@lecuire.fr> Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 18:32:09 +0200 From: BernardL User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; fr; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4C8316C5.2060906@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4C8316C5.2060906@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 100926-0, 26/09/2010), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 18:25:51 +0000 Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Compaq mini CQ10 anyone? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:49:38 -0000 Le 05/09/2010 06:04, Gonzalo Nemmi a écrit : > I just got one and was wondering if anyone was running FreeBSD on it > and how well does it work out of the box. > All comments are welcome. > I have one with FreeBSD 8.1. Some difficulties to install X11 (I had to use Driver "vesa" instead of "intel" in the section "Device" of xorg.config). And the internal Wifi device is not recognized by FreeBSD. Regards Bernard Lecuire > Best Regards. > Gonzalo Nemmi > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 18:55:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23426106566B for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 18:55:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ksambaiah@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6D2B8FC08 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 18:55:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk7 with SMTP id 7so3688068qyk.13 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 11:55:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:message-id :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LCZOE/S7WDGbMZZ0+qsb+S/AkA/7o4ybosxrH91t/7g=; b=aNzxuBfpjIqGjZX5P/sEypRYFU4wlcpNIrNBJ/na42l+cNOvMesFmmAONjnRnnyIRX gAWdi1bgB/20O0i/SqYJ7/pDESFwB0DP02BR5+I1loC1pNWKqhn5ULFaYNG2nWKMxJcC irMVBLyS+9aUSln0PgxD0LLMMOmXLKOIasgPA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:message-id:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=ev/JCPcFj2dpq+5x8ginwMKGC5AlB8JO8LZ/Qb5b4TOcMNUrQXoqMNNPppCVVQc4Hi AIXQ+h/MIOZ6b1fjKAPZIMf2Ycx4cMUv7g5L1cnJB/GI4U2+Qz0+oEES712t0wM2CyqS w/p9HO/wxInwFo1syNd6H8TGLw8bU25gWQaG8= Received: by 10.220.71.136 with SMTP id h8mr2257205vcj.135.1285525892490; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 11:31:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([115.242.249.229]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n9sm974681vch.43.2010.09.26.11.31.30 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 26 Sep 2010 11:31:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 00:01:26 +0530 (IST) From: Sambaiah Kilaru To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <8806241.311285525886467.JavaMail.kilarus@waycareput-lm> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: H/w for gateway and backup (OT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 18:55:26 -0000 Hi All, I am looking to buy some gateway which can run FreeBSD or some *nix with three ethernet ports. I can take any system and make it g/w, but looking any custom h/w (much smaller than cobalt server) I am also looking some 2-8 TB backup drive. I am looking to buy in US. I am out of touch for some time with h/w so requesting through mailing list. thanks, Sam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 19:06:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0704B1065675 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:06:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from henry.olyer@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71D8D8FC16 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:06:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwd6 with SMTP id 6so2794501qwd.13 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 12:06:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=D0jMzG5sOwowfqMMGT75oHw0hcBlB/arlNLjSuVyPgw=; b=Hj+sHnLLiYKNm+zdx/TRKtPzlUnGZMouHnAufHjt/xWSxJ1w+gwH3x+f1b3bPE0BGV F6vVWUFnlXgyWQ1D60Oe0PUWHq10A5+68mERKIFUtFgqG6UeJtQZ0hok3dpjX2wk3jFM IiaGgcXwILcv46HMdHoCLvpewkLIEuI4jEyko= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=jGJcqPLe/y2fC5X0uBbPjuqzxQ9fbLn8/A5a/jlBaaWDP577FFnZlPFiUNE8WswhaV SdvOGg1RSiNAlHBymRxHn/5Il70TSXyLWZYUlbQHt8euRHFdFYWRp2zgsVb76d86t8ZU myjNwEv11CpCu9vkWGeXtjg7arJP122CQzzYI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.34.230 with SMTP id m38mr4637803qad.368.1285528010444; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 12:06:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.97.78 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 12:06:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:06:50 -0400 Message-ID: From: Henry Olyer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=00c09f905f1e69531504912e5086 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-gfx-bugs@nvidia.com Subject: trying to put up X, am using an Nvidia card an HP Presario X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:06:52 -0000 --00c09f905f1e69531504912e5086 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Several people in this group took a lot of time and helped me when I couldn't get FBSD 7.2 running with X on an HP Presario. Now, I'm having *somewhat* *similar* problems, doing the install for 8.1. I've attached my rc,conf, the X log file, and the list of installed packages. I've also said: hald_enable="YES" and dbus_enable="YES" in the rc.conf file. Apparently playing with the boot loader file isn't necessary, now. Oh, I downloaded (using sys-install,) the nvidia helper system but couldn't get the NVIDIA screen logo that goes up just before X comes up. Thanks, all! --00c09f905f1e69531504912e5086-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 19:13:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C50D106564A for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:13:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wodfer@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 627EB8FC0A for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:13:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn34 with SMTP id 34so5188139iwn.13 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 12:13:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=6Ox5euteD2INTcOX78fv4Waau6muQcIvJFSvvk6g04M=; b=FDSR5e1c4qSgJa6p6xda/DDbGwCfJ/7/XW8Tu7K1VjBKA6xF6bmvqNhw3fVQxAJx76 ZERtBoI8hZxPQFIsCvm85fPJgXTzulHYYNMzJGx4Sh842YeugFTXykeNo2deKDbs0b4i /e50aTHQ0pGzswGLfA0Adx9oWBH6HFlxFBJ3s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=otzMuIQHBJusphOwaXNllallKx1JyC9pFTBxq2ZEUejfITVURuw8OVk23lvhvSWCyF VGu3OkGbE8520ZBP/zkiyzqEdOC7ibGcfYKpsbgkJ17yNgcQJCtMPQvKFBWP97H6ip4p ztNQdPhZXWfUaForrU08Q4RHG8SB6rQN55Zlc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.152.78 with SMTP id f14mr7832481ibw.60.1285528434887; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 12:13:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.190.129 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 12:13:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 21:13:54 +0200 Message-ID: From: Andy Wodfer To: freebsd-questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: [SOLVED] Trouble enabling GD in php/apache X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:13:55 -0000 On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Andy Wodfer wrote: > I'm running FreeBSD 8.0 RELEASE. > > I can't get GD enabled. I have installed latestes php5 from ports aswell as > php5-extensions and enabled GD on the option screen: > > cd /usr/ports/lang/php5 > make deinstall > make clean > make rmconfig > make install clean > > cd /usr/ports/lang/php5-extensions > make deinstall > make clean > make rmconfig > make install clean > > I'm running the latest Apache 2.2.x version and GD 2.0.35. > > I'm currently doing a portupgrade -a to see if that helps, but I think not. > > What's the correct way of getting GD to work on Ie. a webshop (opencart)? > > Thanks for all help! > > Cheers, > Andy > I solved my problem by manually deleting /usr/local/lib/php/20090626/gd.so and reinstalling the php5-extensions. /Andreas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 19:28:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D85106566C for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:28:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@magnesium.net) Received: from toxic.magnesium.net (toxic.magnesium.net [207.154.84.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 058BA8FC0A for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:28:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by toxic.magnesium.net (Postfix, from userid 1070) id 64A39DA8D1; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 12:28:27 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 12:28:27 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20100926192827.GA41457@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 21 of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Subject: from /var/log/auth.log X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:28:26 -0000 guys, here is the outpput from 20 mins ago from auth.log. i saw this last night. any clues what i'm doing wrong? eg., what is "auxpropfunc"? i've done about as much as i can. spamassassin was not running, etc. i did a reboot so everything should be reinitialized correctly. Sep 26 12:00:34 ethic shutdown: reboot by kline: Sep 26 12:00:36 ethic sshd[978]: Received signal 15; terminating. Sep 26 12:00:51 ethic sm-mta[15391]: sql_select option missing Sep 26 12:00:51 ethic sm-mta[15391]: auxpropfunc error no mechanism available Sep 26 12:02:41 ethic saslauthd[833]: detach_tty : master pid is: 833 Sep 26 12:02:41 ethic saslauthd[833]: ipc_init : listening on socket: /var/run/saslauthd/mux Sep 26 12:02:53 ethic sshd[978]: Server listening on :: port 22. Sep 26 12:02:53 ethic sshd[978]: Server listening on 0.0.0.0 port 22. Sep 26 12:02:54 ethic sm-mta[982]: sql_select option missing Sep 26 12:02:54 ethic sm-mta[982]: auxpropfunc error no mechanism available Sep 26 12:14:46 ethic sshd[1142]: Accepted publickey for kline from 10.47.0.110 port 55753 ssh2 can anybody help me? gsry going for a nap. four hours doesnt cut it no mo' -- Gary Kline Seattle BSD Users' Group (seabug) | kline@magnesium.net Thought Unlimited Org's Alternate Email Site http://www.magnesium.net/~kline To live is not a necessity; but to live honorably...is a necessity. -Kant From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 19:28:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD252106566C for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:28:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from henry.olyer@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f170.google.com (mail-qy0-f170.google.com [209.85.216.170]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F1318FC15 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:28:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk35 with SMTP id 35so4386396qyk.15 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 12:28:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=b+deA3RQoJH16htltayYZ+NGz9j0a+jM3pnMvRCjIGo=; b=At3CB9cujC+e0n+munH8ZENLnmMRrOjhnBhE6JO1ZeDs+6uJrQ1uhk2afPjUbYoWCX sroTkIYXAY1jB24SchR81gCYZdID6uqpSxCO6B8OqUtjWVirg2gAEgI1HgTIeWNfXOLS 9lDv6rhe0npxkZeo864wyB3GrV+rUQCJt3Ox0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ra3o8hTCjczUFW9wWFKUjYKgg6+nc21rs7d4+1+kNyLyfy+JiVGzelkTAH9Y3BZFor /v75CM9nTcA8aGTMvK/Rcw6yEdmcI8I0WByxyHBe1uCxhmWJnGIDEbJXjpa/L1JsF3+b ZJwFOSK58+N+W+PmkE9qiHCy6RURbnDGPoCyc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.191.78 with SMTP id dl14mr4745420qcb.285.1285529333900; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 12:28:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.97.78 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 12:28:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 15:28:53 -0400 Message-ID: From: Henry Olyer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-gfx-bugs@nvidia.com Subject: Re: trying to put up X, am using an Nvidia card an HP Presario X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:28:55 -0000 Kenneth CF once wrote: > 2) Install the nvidia-driver. > # cd /usr/ports/x11/x11-driver/nvidia-driver > # make install clean (I built with options FREEBSD_AGP checked, ACPI checked, LINUX unchecked). > and this didn't help. Under 7.2, this was the game changer. Everything worked with this and a couple tweaks. On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 3:06 PM, Henry Olyer wrote: > Several people in this group took a lot of time and helped me when I > couldn't get FBSD 7.2 running with X on an HP Presario. > > Now, I'm having *somewhat* *similar* problems, doing the install for 8.1. > > I've attached my rc,conf, the X log file, and the list of installed > packages. > > I've also said: > > hald_enable="YES" and dbus_enable="YES" in the rc.conf file. Apparently > playing with the boot loader file isn't necessary, now. > > Oh, I downloaded (using sys-install,) the nvidia helper system but couldn't > get the NVIDIA screen logo that goes up just before X comes up. > > Thanks, all! > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 19:48:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE25A1065674 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:48:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A00D38FC1F for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:48:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o8QJmCZj092585 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:48:12 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <4C9FA373.3040606@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:48:03 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dick Hoogendijk References: <4C9F74DD.6000009@nagual.nl> <4C9F7F40.60407@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4C9F87E8.5000502@nagual.nl> In-Reply-To: <4C9F87E8.5000502@nagual.nl> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigD6ACF8C28733DE4B742C6C6F" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,DKIM_ADSP_ALL, SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: port upgrading X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:48:17 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigD6ACF8C28733DE4B742C6C6F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 26/09/2010 18:50:32, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > On 26-9-2010 19:13, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> Really either of those two will serve you well, as will various others= >=20 > I like portupgrade. > One question about dependencies: if I want to update *one* port I have > to run "portupgrade -R portname", right. > But *when* do I run portupgrade -R ,name> c.q. portupgrade -rR ? It depends on what you want to update. 'portupgrade -R name' updates name plus anything name depends on. 'portupgrade -rR name' updates name plus anything name depends on, plus anything that depends on name. In all cases, only ports that have updates available are updated, so if everything in the dependency chain is already up to date, the command (either variant) may do nothing. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigD6ACF8C28733DE4B742C6C6F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkyfo3wACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxn7wCfdX6TY5IAf6MpczNZkdagKaFC FOgAn2dh5nZtzA37MeRDQdhnzpo+Hifa =krI2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigD6ACF8C28733DE4B742C6C6F-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 20:01:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35DB2106566C for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:01:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike.w.meyer@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFF598FC14 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:01:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn34 with SMTP id 34so5224419iwn.13 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 13:01:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:cc:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:organization:x-mailer:face :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8Ml1/mibj9yh1itMnBT6g3yW8S2FrvnYsLA24R5qxF4=; b=G6gl4oXCV6CIvidEOt/DfWyXMVWpZ4RzhimUrivzovky6YySTB3jTzBBEwuRMPEYXd 1Bt/rXeu1x237eP3rgVTeAr8gT+anKeuNmXIbdZLc9cBL97BGJpE2LgEkDGvocjS6Kb7 +BJTP0CjEaDQ1xz6BgrGQWxx6mp1V9uDc/a/4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :organization:x-mailer:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=Xy4NuW7L4/L6LLmc7eaVas9gLdv+BRfQ+QDDlJYPFF4Z5P9Mk0x5L4dn8vjiKO9UJU Y2uuSRqLuWNpehNxSl8A+0yRCVnO9CJUCS1K9TG/Qfc15AwDVjYIDMZMKBzWYxIEBBu9 upyYSLI6jsG5lAF0moVDvvsutRkXCvoXlVI1g= Received: by 10.231.157.207 with SMTP id c15mr7754512ibx.143.1285531279933; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 13:01:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bhuda.mired.org ([74.143.213.42]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g31sm5256782ibh.22.2010.09.26.13.01.18 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 26 Sep 2010 13:01:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:01:14 -0400 From: Mike Meyer To: Robert Bonomi Message-ID: <20100926160114.0d97a56c@bhuda.mired.org> In-Reply-To: <201009251958.o8PJwLd0027577@mail.r-bonomi.com> References: <201009251958.o8PJwLd0027577@mail.r-bonomi.com> Organization: Meyer Consulting X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems mounting nfs from freebsd to Mac. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:01:21 -0000 On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 14:58:21 -0500 (CDT) Robert Bonomi wrote: > > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sat Sep 25 03:29:33 2010 > > Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2010 04:01:18 -0400 > > From: Mike Meyer > > To: questions@freebsd.org > > Cc: > > Subject: Problems mounting nfs from freebsd to Mac. > > > > I've got an nfs server that's refusing to mount one client - via one > > route - and it's driving me crazy. > > First question, are you _SURE_ that it's a server-side problem? I under- > stand that things are failing in one situation and not others, but there > are about -five- possible causations, only one of which is a server-side > NFS configuration. No, I'm not sure. The question is more "what server tools can I use figure out what's wrong" than "how do I fix the server". That the FreeBSD community is the most helpful one involved might have some bearing on which question I chose to ask here. > > As far as I know, there are only three reasons for an NFS server to > > refuse a mount request: 1) The exports file is borked somehow, 2) The > > server insists that the client use a privileged port, or 3) The IP > > address the request is coming from is disallowed. > There _are_ others, depending on how access controls are specified in > the exports file. Those are pretty much what I meant by "the exports file is borked somehow". The file systems are all zfs, all exported by zfs, and mostly all inherited from the parent file system. For the record, that's: /export -maproot 0 -network 192.xx.yy.0/25 > > #1 isn't it - the file systems mount fine on other boxes. And they > > mount fine on the problem box via Wifi. > > > > #2 shouldn't be it - I'm running the server with -n turned on, and the > > mount works via wifi. > > > > #3 seems logical, but I only have one network enabled, and it's a > > *.0/25. The working addresses include .96, and .106, while the failing > > address is .105. So I'm not sure what's going on here. > > > > Running mountd with a -d flag generates no output at all when the > > request is denied. This makes me think I'm not looking in the right > > place. > > First thing, what does 'showmount -a', run on the misbehaving client show? > And are there differences, depending on being on the wired vs wireless link? Just "All mounts on localhost:" and then an empty list, whether they are mounted or not. > Check how the client resolves the server hostname on both the wireless and > wired links. It's the same. That's expected - the WRT610N is providing both dns & dhcp services, and they both resolve through it. > make sure the _server_ name (in the form used in the nfs mount) is > resolving in the same way -- to the same address -- when the client is > on thee wireless and wired links. (an 'unqualified' hostname, and a > lack of a default domain in the wired setup _could_ cause what you > are seeing. Yup, both connections resolve to the same address. Yes, I use an unqualified hostname, but the dhcp server provides a default domain. > Check to make sure you've got network connectivity both ways on both the > wired and wireless links. Does traceroute work in both directions on > both links? does it show the _same_names_? Yes, and yes. > You've say you've got a WRT610N in the middle of things. Is it actually > playing _router_ on all ports, or switch/hub on the lan side with routing > on the external interface. The latter, and it's bridging the wireless network into the LAN side as well. > If it's actually -routing- on all ports, check _both_ the client and server > routing tables to make sure they're pointing in the right plac, when the > client is connected on both paths. Also double-check the router itself > for any access-control and/or filtering rules. Those all look right to me. In particular, the client routing tables are identical (module different interface names & ip addresses) when it's on the wireless and wired connection. > If nothing has shown up so far, an obvious next step is to look at the data > 'on the wire' between the machines. e.g., tcpdump/etherfind/netshark etc. I was hoping for something a little bit higher level than that, but I guess that's what's next. Thanks, http://www.mired.org/consulting.html Independent Network/Unix/Perforce consultant, email for more information. O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 20:02:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E63D21065670 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:02:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jlalarcon@gawab.com) Received: from info3.gawab.com (mailhost18.gawab.com [66.220.20.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B96898FC17 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:02:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 7612 invoked by uid 1004); 26 Sep 2010 19:35:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (jlalarcon@gawab.com@79.147.101.76) by gawab.com with SMTP; 26 Sep 2010 19:35:47 -0000 X-Trusted: Whitelisted Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 21:35:43 +0200 From: Jose Luis Alarcon Sanchez To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100926193543.GA3755@Endeavour.lordofunix.org> References: <4C8316C5.2060906@gmail.com> <4C9F7589.5090707@lecuire.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4C9F7589.5090707@lecuire.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Compaq mini CQ10 anyone? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:02:29 -0000 On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 06:32:09PM +0200, BernardL wrote: > Le 05/09/2010 06:04, Gonzalo Nemmi a écrit : > > I just got one and was wondering if anyone was running FreeBSD on it > > and how well does it work out of the box. > > All comments are welcome. > > > I have one with FreeBSD 8.1. Some difficulties to install X11 (I had to > use Driver "vesa" instead of "intel" in the section "Device" of > xorg.config). And the internal Wifi device is not recognized by FreeBSD. > Regards > Bernard Lecuire > > Best Regards. > > Gonzalo Nemmi > > Can you tell us what is the Chip of your internal WiFi device?. Maybe knowing the Chip model and brand someone knows if can help you. :) Thanks you very much, in advance. Regards. Jose. -- http://lordofunix.eu5.org/ Not Registered GNU/Hurd User. Registered BSD User 51101. Registered Linux User #213309. Memories..... You are talking about memories. Rick Deckard. Blade Runner. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 20:45:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 460B7106566B; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:45:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhellenthal@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FD318FC1B; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:45:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk7 with SMTP id 7so3797432qyk.13 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 13:45:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wrVzsPCQw7gmKIxRlNgxMcJKg7suaJALl7/7Vi6H0R8=; b=ppQzUvtEBbKcso8zBnSonGfHF3O6zVKtLd0xjT227+UlxrUxHZIaOksMZdNJfp2ymK jGIGbF5pvFbAtPTamwkWKYruo9xYXpGJtLqjIZkNqLynXzTTp4lUUk1E+4MGNwKOJifG jeE57Ho+ril6TcNogXhCFd3VP252WZD7Ln2Do= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=txjnTtDdzQKkoYGkkR8/CvloViAi7QM+LYdZjBV43D6fCA9Mp7QOVo0GuLoNe/kWdt lA/C22fCkiTQymiDnSttngFs45jbsVWJcuRpnTXyaEn9Y+7lukL6BlS6kHBqDRRwOnKR BKOZlqVADrQtEHz7VQ8Zcfs9pnX5hn9lwMO1o= Received: by 10.220.60.10 with SMTP id n10mr2049215vch.45.1285533909528; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 13:45:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from centel.dataix.local (adsl-99-19-43-205.dsl.klmzmi.sbcglobal.net [99.19.43.205]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t13sm1017229vcj.20.2010.09.26.13.45.07 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 26 Sep 2010 13:45:08 -0700 (PDT) Sender: "J. Hellenthal" Message-ID: <4C9FB0D2.1010205@DataIX.net> Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 16:45:06 -0400 From: jhell User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100917 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Samuel_Mart=EDn_Moro?= References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:45:12 -0000 This is more for questions@ or pf@ On 09/26/2010 11:43, Samuel Martín Moro wrote: > On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Michael Powell wrote: > >> Samuel Martín Moro wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> >>> I'm trying to set up pf on my soon-to-be new gateway (8.1-RELEASE amd64). >>> I used the sample configuration file available on >>> calomel >>> After a few tests, it appears that the gate has fully access to the >>> internet, but I can't open connections from clients to distant servers >>> (web, ssh, ...). >>> Checking pflog log file, I can't see anything about those timeouts, even >>> if I added the log directive in every block/pass command. >>> Everything else seems to work, I can talk with my DNS from the internet, >>> ssh redirections to another pc also seems to works. >>> I just can't access the Internet from a client of my network... >>> >>> For debugging, I commented out the options and the 'block all in/out' >>> directives. >>> >>> Here's my config file http://pastebin.com/Nim2zBCx >>> >>> Is there someone understanding what I'm doing wrong? >>> >> The firewall ruleset is a trifle overly complex for a quick glance; study >> and analysis would take some doing. However, if you can reach the internet >> from the firewall box and other client computers behind your NAT can't >> (which is what it sounds like you're describing) it may be just that you >> are >> missing gateway_enable="YES" in your /etc/rc.conf. >> >> Turning this "ON" makes your firewall box into a router. The status of this >> can be checked with: sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding - a "0" means no >> gateway >> and a "1" means gateway. >> >> -Mike >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > the gateway is already enabled (and forwarding is correctly set) > whatever, I had to do quick, I started again > I think the missing thing on my old conf was the 'scrub' (at least) > I made a more simple configuration, as following: > > ext_if="bge0" > int_if="bge1" > localnet = $int_if:network > emma="10.242.42.200" > alpha="10.42.42.42" > delta="10.42.42.44" > set skip on lo0 > scrub in on $ext_if all fragment reassemble > #INTERNETZ > nat on $ext_if from $localnet to any -> ($ext_if) > #EMMA > rdr on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to ($ext_if) port 1101 -> > $emma port 22 > rdr on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to ($ext_if) port 307 -> > $emma port 80 > #WHAT.CD > rdr on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to ($ext_if) port 1666 -> > $alpha port 1666 > #REMOTE ADM > rdr on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to ($ext_if) port 1667 -> > $delta port 22 > rdr on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to ($ext_if) port 1668 -> > $alpha port 22 > pass in log on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to $ext_if port 22 > pass in log on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to $ext_if port 53 > pass in log on $ext_if inet proto udp from any to $ext_if port 53 > pass in log on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to $ext_if port 1664 > pass in log on $int_if inet proto tcp from any to any > pass in log on $int_if inet proto udp from any to any > block in log on $ext_if inet proto icmp from any to $ext_if > > it's basically working > i'll stuff it when I'll have time. > > Samuel Martín Moro > {EPITECH.} tek5 -- jhell,v From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 20:49:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99766106566B for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:49:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@magnesium.net) Received: from toxic.magnesium.net (toxic.magnesium.net [207.154.84.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 851BD8FC0C for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:49:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by toxic.magnesium.net (Postfix, from userid 1070) id 0B058DA888; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 13:49:12 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 13:49:12 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: John Levine Message-ID: <20100926204911.GA42850@thought.org> References: <20100926182200.GA40516@thought.org> <20100926203720.66674.qmail@joyce.lan> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100926203720.66674.qmail@joyce.lan> X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 21 of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, kline@magnesium.net Subject: Re: /var/log/maillog X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:49:10 -0000 On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 08:37:20PM -0000, John Levine wrote: > >Sep 26 11:13:47 ethic dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=, method=PLAIN, > >rip=10.47.0.230, lip=10.47.0.230, TLS > >Sep 26 11:14:48 ethic dovecot: IMAP(kline): Connection closed bytes=824/490 > > OK, you logged in, checked your mail, and logged out. > > >Sep 26 11:15:07 ethic sm-mta[15070]: ruleset=check_relay, arg1=109.106.10.75.sumtel.ua, > >arg2=127.0.0.4, relay=109.106.10.75.sumtel.ua [109.106.10.75], reject=550 5.7.1 Rejected: > >109.106.10.75 listed at sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org > >p1 11:15 [4598] > > A 'bot in the Ukraine attempted to send mail, and your MTA rejected it > since it was blacklisted. > > Those entries are all perfectly normal. > > Not to belabor the obvious, but you need to tell us what you did, what > you expected to happen, what happened instead, and the log entries > showing what was going on while it happened. > > R's, > John well, i fibbed about napping, but have discovered the following: from my freebsd server, ethic, i can, as root, get mail out to my shell account here at magnesium.net. so far, that's about it. I _did_ a pkgdb -F which seemed to correct much in that database. i have send mail to the test acct at freebsd.org. i haven't seen anything. nutshell: it looks as tho i can send mail as root [from ethic]. i will now try my desktop and see what happens. -- Gary Kline Seattle BSD Users' Group (seabug) | kline@magnesium.net Thought Unlimited Org's Alternate Email Site http://www.magnesium.net/~kline To live is not a necessity; but to live honorably...is a necessity. -Kant From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 20:52:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCCC0106566B for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:52:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A96E8FC0A for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:52:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o8QKqRfQ091449; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 14:52:27 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id o8QKqQca091446; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 14:52:27 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 14:52:26 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Dick Hoogendijk In-Reply-To: <4C9F74DD.6000009@nagual.nl> Message-ID: References: <4C9F74DD.6000009@nagual.nl> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 26 Sep 2010 14:52:27 -0600 (MDT) Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: port upgrading X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:52:30 -0000 On Sun, 26 Sep 2010, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > I'm in doubt. I wanted to bring my ports collection uptodate, so I ran "csup > -L 2 /root/ports-supfile" and that updated my ports collection. At least, I > hope so. > > Then I started googling and found that cvsup is not recommended. Better tot > use portsnap (???) > And also portupgrade was a no go. I should be using portmaster. They are judgement calls. csup is one method, portsnap another. portsnap may be faster, and probably should be the default choice any more (lower bandwidth). portupgrade still works, and many of us still use it. For me, it's just that I almost know how to run portupgrade now, and portmaster didn't seem any better when I tried it. > Woh, I'm confused now. > Question: what is best used to have an up2date ports collection nowadays? > This system is FreeBSD8/amd64. This is an overview of what works for me: http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/portupgrade.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 21:04:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59EFE106564A for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 21:04:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from prvs=0878c368f3=johnl@iecc.com) Received: from gal.iecc.com (gal.iecc.com [64.57.183.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA3798FC15 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 21:04:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14322 invoked from network); 26 Sep 2010 20:37:20 -0000 Received: from mail1.iecc.com (64.57.183.56) by mail1.iecc.com with QMQP; 26 Sep 2010 20:37:20 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple; d=iecc.com; h=date:message-id:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=k1009; olt=johnl@user.iecc.com; bh=pQ1WkFfaKZXcVMBHpZRs2RFsCf4sEkPR3I6F9x0q7KU=; b=KG7lUOAxTcLRLMcgunAdcd7IpMAIbt5opNXtb2uv6RLsHH8WJbTmKGrHzoEufnZmM40zjnc0wNQz9g1fnE5WJsne6gKt4sNFSjjaVwHZGY9xs1uzR1Tm5g8p725b/K6HpZi2fEBdLl14xZqz0A0k5Sg3IjKl6PufBqO8zkTu2ug= Date: 26 Sep 2010 20:37:20 -0000 Message-ID: <20100926203720.66674.qmail@joyce.lan> From: John Levine To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20100926182200.GA40516@thought.org> Organization: X-Headerized: yes Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: kline@magnesium.net Subject: Re: /var/log/maillog X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 21:04:02 -0000 >Sep 26 11:13:47 ethic dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=, method=PLAIN, >rip=10.47.0.230, lip=10.47.0.230, TLS >Sep 26 11:14:48 ethic dovecot: IMAP(kline): Connection closed bytes=824/490 OK, you logged in, checked your mail, and logged out. >Sep 26 11:15:07 ethic sm-mta[15070]: ruleset=check_relay, arg1=109.106.10.75.sumtel.ua, >arg2=127.0.0.4, relay=109.106.10.75.sumtel.ua [109.106.10.75], reject=550 5.7.1 Rejected: >109.106.10.75 listed at sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org >p1 11:15 [4598] A 'bot in the Ukraine attempted to send mail, and your MTA rejected it since it was blacklisted. Those entries are all perfectly normal. Not to belabor the obvious, but you need to tell us what you did, what you expected to happen, what happened instead, and the log entries showing what was going on while it happened. R's, John From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 26 21:06:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98F471065670 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 21:06:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A27A8FC0A for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 21:06:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwb15 with SMTP id 15so1736704gwb.13 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 14:06:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.47.20 with SMTP id z20mr7683398ybj.421.1285535180692; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 14:06:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-071-077-039-064.nc.res.rr.com [71.77.39.64]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v6sm4559420ybm.23.2010.09.26.14.06.19 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 26 Sep 2010 14:06:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: FreeBSD.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48D55E5480D for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:06:18 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 17:06:17 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20100926170617.1aba1049@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20100926193543.GA3755@Endeavour.lordofunix.org> References: <4C8316C5.2060906@gmail.com> <4C9F7589.5090707@lecuire.fr> <20100926193543.GA3755@Endeavour.lordofunix.org> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Compaq mini CQ10 anyone? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 21:06:21 -0000 On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 21:35:43 +0200 Jose Luis Alarcon Sanchez articulated: > On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 06:32:09PM +0200, BernardL wrote: > > Le 05/09/2010 06:04, Gonzalo Nemmi a écrit : > > > I just got one and was wondering if anyone was running FreeBSD on > > > it and how well does it work out of the box. > > > All comments are welcome. > > > > > I have one with FreeBSD 8.1. Some difficulties to install X11 (I > > had to use Driver "vesa" instead of "intel" in the section "Device" > > of xorg.config). And the internal Wifi device is not recognized by > > FreeBSD. Regards > > Bernard Lecuire > > > Best Regards. > > > Gonzalo Nemmi > > > > > Can you tell us what is the Chip of your internal WiFi device?. Maybe > knowing the Chip model and brand someone knows if can help you. :) I have used that PC. I am pretty sure it has an 'N' protocol wireless network card and therefore FreeBSD will most likely not support it. Virtually all new PCs have 'N' protocol cards installed by default unless it is a very cheap model. -- Jerry ✌ FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 03:06:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3742D1065670 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 03:06:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from myself@rdtan.net) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E71A08FC12 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 03:06:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk7 with SMTP id 7so4205434qyk.13 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:06:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.125.38 with SMTP id w38mr1924733vcr.93.1285556772001; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:06:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xhost.local ([115.133.231.124]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o24sm1241392vcf.18.2010.09.26.20.06.09 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:06:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CA00A1F.5010405@rdtan.net> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:06:07 +0800 From: Edward User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.4; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gonzalo Nemmi References: <4C8316C5.2060906@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4C8316C5.2060906@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Compaq mini CQ10 anyone? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 03:06:13 -0000 > I just got one and was wondering if anyone was running FreeBSD on it > and how well does it work out of the box. > All comments are welcome. Try PCBSD (http://pcbsd.org), is a Desktop BSD variant based on FreeBSD. Personally, I've used FreeBSD in a laptop in a few occasions but after trying out PCBSD, this path requires the least effort to setup a Desktop. The installation & setting up of hardware is too easy. The kernel that comes with it, does a good job in recognizing the wireless chip, sound card, NIC, display & other stuff. Even though it uses the PBI format to install software on PCBSD, one can still use port to install additional softwares on it by using the "portjail" console. Both PBI & port works together well. In short, it definitely worth a try! :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 03:26:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD1F0106564A for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 03:26:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from myself@rdtan.net) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9925F8FC13 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 03:26:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk30 with SMTP id 30so152284qyk.13 for ; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:26:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.98.146 with SMTP id q18mr2355746vcn.113.1285558001262; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:26:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xhost.local ([115.133.231.124]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e31sm3307712vbe.19.2010.09.26.20.26.38 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:26:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CA00EEC.2010806@rdtan.net> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:26:36 +0800 From: Edward User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.4; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dick Hoogendijk References: <4C9F74DD.6000009@nagual.nl> In-Reply-To: <4C9F74DD.6000009@nagual.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: port upgrading X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 03:26:42 -0000 > Woh, I'm confused now. > Question: what is best used to have an up2date ports collection nowadays? "portsnap fetch extract update" for the first time after you've setup the FreeBSD for the very first time. As the parameters used, it fetch the ports tree, extract it to /usr/ports and update it. "portsnap fetch update" every now and then to update the ports tree. In addition, "portmanager" does a good job in managing ports in terms of install/update of ports. It doesn't required ports index to find out what is installed or needs to upgrade as it scans the ports tree for dependency, every time. This is good because I don't have to deal with the problem of ports index getting corrupted. Because of this, it does required more time to install/update ports compare to "portmaster" & "portupgrade". I've recorded some of my experience in using "portmanager" : http://scratching.psybermonkey.net/2010/01/freebsd-how-to-manage-ports-in-freebsd.html My 2 cents, Edward. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 04:54:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5A58106564A for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 04:54:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bh@izb.knu.ac.kr) Received: from pinus.izb.knu.ac.kr (pinus.izb.knu.ac.kr [IPv6:2001:470:1f05:5f6:3::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C00C8FC12 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 04:54:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pinus.izb.knu.ac.kr (localhost.izb.knu.ac.kr [IPv6:::1]) by pinus.izb.knu.ac.kr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5F9B5737B; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:54:21 +0900 (KST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=izb.knu.ac.kr; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=soyeomul; i=bh@izb.knu.ac.kr; bh=E ND2oaATPdcFwbzocjIFJC/yMcVEyAhqQiNvgXqMtSk=; b=QmL/A93X2dh9VmmIj lbASAK8n/Oy9LrJXzXxo1d8pPDxt1VWChP2Asm6cWHNrnA6MqEVfCOPVAV2pzsEy Xtw2KbUHNRuaEPfrP/kswE3mP69KJz5I5ITQc7bFXSGhriej1AiM/chwnKXeEYXP 7ylQY5t3A+547+QsjGvR8qGxeE= Received: from betla.izb.knu.ac.kr (betla.izb.knu.ac.kr [IPv6:2001:470:1f05:5f6:3::b]) by pinus.izb.knu.ac.kr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C19657379; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:54:21 +0900 (KST) Received: from betla.home (unknown [59.24.179.184]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bh@izb.knu.ac.kr) by betla.izb.knu.ac.kr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E26D1CCF0; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:54:21 +0900 (KST) From: Byung-Hee HWANG To: Gary Kline Organization: GR References: <20100926182200.GA40516@thought.org> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAHlBMVEVMM2UIAhGJrpkJDwsD AwgJAggKPnwFBAIEBAQJAjTkRM0eAAACN0lEQVQ4jW3Tv2sbMRQHcPnSDt78bMWctkOBgDc7 10I8Cl6DOpZm6RgPBx4LgbrjUbVVNiuXHNF/2yfJzqnEwmDfffyV9PSD2UNTfuu9A/65cT39 AnZ4j8pTcxzM/HlO4F8BnAcHCK14CuBeQXAFAJwbg/MmS2igEDWtrfZ9PyQiiJCxei1o+CNY bUJX4J1Cr8TQlbWmFZ3vijFwT58c7kW3Z3K84oJrFAPYds8Yk6zmwnGLGai9rApZnaGgBbAZ wF6GdoY3DiADA74IMMa5KzFPGEWDSLmAiSttDkhTqUVxAX+c/g9ER7BeVnzyZAdA5Go9Y+OC ydXNXZlDCetJtfpWyXp6xzNQmkA+i0J+nI7jGJjKVjPfXYUKpXtc3AbQR2CraazQP17StKgr /QpXEZrNAdIY7Wx/HmHR91U2K8XP10BLSEvS94scoPUJvN/mCVSqxiVBBdCzAbDkeG2/XlVy BCA8ZoD4AZdUxYsiABPABNCIhsagnng4LDvL0LYYijdWCZrsRTx3YUnQGh46+0sZ2tv3MZ1A xdKNxnuYFO9onTEClYZpHX//LNjyOiRs2ihzhO9MVnYACqo051YUZwMYhXEW1L7s2XU6LxZv I6g4L1NTeSm7+wUBlCpD3Cyl3KXEqq5ZG+8RhEfBqsN2jrqaQYQ2PH/qRqmnh4auGgjnXPrj j1udunqg887i/daHXTlA+Gbgm8aX9k1jvifQp2Ajm+2pRL+hk3QKGikv3dv3IdE4cwL+ATzH tMu8OktOAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Url: http://izb.knu.ac.kr/~bh/ X-Window-System: GNU Network Object Model Environment OpenPGP: id=96B196FE (expiration: 2013-10-26); perference=sign Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:54:12 +0900 In-Reply-To: <20100926182200.GA40516@thought.org> (Gary Kline's message of "Sun, 26 Sep 2010 11:22:00 -0700") Message-ID: <86mxr34wi3.fsf@betla.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: /var/log/maillog X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 04:54:23 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Gary Kline writes: > Here is a snippet of maillog. mutt still exiting with an 'Exec Error' > > > Sep 26 11:13:47 ethic dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=3D, method= =3DPLAIN, rip=3D10.47.0.230, lip=3D10.47.0.230, TLS > Sep 26 11:14:48 ethic dovecot: IMAP(kline): Connection closed bytes=3D824= /490 > Sep 26 11:15:07 ethic sm-mta[15070]: ruleset=3Dcheck_relay, arg1=3D109.10= 6.10.75.sumtel.ua, arg2=3D127.0.0.4, relay=3D109.106.10.75.sumtel.ua [109.1= 06.10.75], reject=3D550 5.7.1 Rejected: 109.106.10.75 listed at sbl-xbl.spa= mhaus.org > p1 11:15 [4598]=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 > > anybody? Gary, just use smart host to google. That's powerful! Sincerely, =2D-=20 =EC=86=8C=EC=97=AC=EB=AC=BC =ED=99=A9=EB=B3=91=ED=9D=AC(=E9=BB=83=E7=82=B3= =E7=86=99) | .. =EC=B6=9C=ED=95=AD 15=EB=B6=84=EC=A0=84.. "Get up when it's dinnertime and then you can eat. I'm not going to cook again for you." -- Tommy's mother, "Chapter 30", page 416 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkygI3gACgkQsCouaZaxlv7oQwCgpZdscjG8SWobgPsXOSXKwsH8 fvoAnRU2s+3v1gqBcGebY4ieRJz+HyUe =3KLm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 05:16:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D26D51065670 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 05:16:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from ethic.thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 821A68FC0C for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 05:16:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.47.0.110] (newtao.thought.org [10.47.0.110]) (authenticated bits=0) by ethic.thought.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o8R5Ge4a062391; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 22:16:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) From: kline To: Byung-Hee HWANG In-Reply-To: <86mxr34wi3.fsf@betla.home> References: <20100926182200.GA40516@thought.org> <86mxr34wi3.fsf@betla.home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Organization: Thought Unlimited Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 22:16:34 -0700 Message-ID: <1285564594.2397.23.camel@newtao> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.9 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on ethic.thought.org Cc: Gary Kline , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: /var/log/maillog X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 05:16:45 -0000 On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 13:54 +0900, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote: > Gary Kline writes: > > > Here is a snippet of maillog. mutt still exiting with an 'Exec Error' > > > > > > Sep 26 11:13:47 ethic dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=, method=PLAIN, rip=10.47.0.230, lip=10.47.0.230, TLS > > Sep 26 11:14:48 ethic dovecot: IMAP(kline): Connection closed bytes=824/490 > > Sep 26 11:15:07 ethic sm-mta[15070]: ruleset=check_relay, arg1=109.106.10.75.sumtel.ua, arg2=127.0.0.4, relay=109.106.10.75.sumtel.ua [109.106.10.75], reject=550 5.7.1 Rejected: 109.106.10.75 listed at sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org > > p1 11:15 [4598] > > > > anybody? > > Gary, just use smart host to google. That's powerful! > > Sincerely, Actually, I have started using google to search for all types of things, :-) The above is still a mystery tho. -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://thought.org Public Service Unix The 7.83a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org http://journey.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 05:34:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2487B1065672 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 05:34:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bh@izb.knu.ac.kr) Received: from pinus.izb.knu.ac.kr (pinus.izb.knu.ac.kr [IPv6:2001:470:1f05:5f6:3::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D0248FC08 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 05:34:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pinus.izb.knu.ac.kr (localhost.izb.knu.ac.kr [IPv6:::1]) by pinus.izb.knu.ac.kr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D77B57378; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:34:24 +0900 (KST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=izb.knu.ac.kr; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:content-type; s=soyeomul; i=bh@izb.knu.ac.kr; bh=c KiM1AYh1q8bABJ/BKkSWz+hIoinI+iZI0hw9PTXf9c=; b=qltOII0sWpUzWFMJ7 xrw6El8fqidJ/hIjVsmIGbkogzN1M9l+1TQ77ErukKsBb35FFtONekhbzK0ZPUb4 Yw+Z/ikakaZIoS1N+PgD/r3Lfb5bKzLXgnAK+oG+20SRX4SnhKITRk9wTk6fY1Eb EDHySkGHJHMqf/F+5ObGzBvhFo= Received: from betla.izb.knu.ac.kr (betla.izb.knu.ac.kr [IPv6:2001:470:1f05:5f6:3::b]) by pinus.izb.knu.ac.kr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 430A557375; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:34:24 +0900 (KST) Received: from betla.home (unknown [59.24.179.184]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bh@izb.knu.ac.kr) by betla.izb.knu.ac.kr (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5FFB1CCF0; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:34:23 +0900 (KST) From: Byung-Hee HWANG To: kline Organization: GR References: <20100926182200.GA40516@thought.org> <86mxr34wi3.fsf@betla.home> <1285564594.2397.23.camel@newtao> Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAHlBMVEVMM2UIAhGJrpkJDwsD AwgJAggKPnwFBAIEBAQJAjTkRM0eAAACN0lEQVQ4jW3Tv2sbMRQHcPnSDt78bMWctkOBgDc7 10I8Cl6DOpZm6RgPBx4LgbrjUbVVNiuXHNF/2yfJzqnEwmDfffyV9PSD2UNTfuu9A/65cT39 AnZ4j8pTcxzM/HlO4F8BnAcHCK14CuBeQXAFAJwbg/MmS2igEDWtrfZ9PyQiiJCxei1o+CNY bUJX4J1Cr8TQlbWmFZ3vijFwT58c7kW3Z3K84oJrFAPYds8Yk6zmwnGLGai9rApZnaGgBbAZ wF6GdoY3DiADA74IMMa5KzFPGEWDSLmAiSttDkhTqUVxAX+c/g9ER7BeVnzyZAdA5Go9Y+OC ydXNXZlDCetJtfpWyXp6xzNQmkA+i0J+nI7jGJjKVjPfXYUKpXtc3AbQR2CraazQP17StKgr /QpXEZrNAdIY7Wx/HmHR91U2K8XP10BLSEvS94scoPUJvN/mCVSqxiVBBdCzAbDkeG2/XlVy BCA8ZoD4AZdUxYsiABPABNCIhsagnng4LDvL0LYYijdWCZrsRTx3YUnQGh46+0sZ2tv3MZ1A xdKNxnuYFO9onTEClYZpHX//LNjyOiRs2ihzhO9MVnYACqo051YUZwMYhXEW1L7s2XU6LxZv I6g4L1NTeSm7+wUBlCpD3Cyl3KXEqq5ZG+8RhEfBqsN2jrqaQYQ2PH/qRqmnh4auGgjnXPrj j1udunqg887i/daHXTlA+Gbgm8aX9k1jvifQp2Ajm+2pRL+hk3QKGikv3dv3IdE4cwL+ATzH tMu8OktOAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Url: http://izb.knu.ac.kr/~bh/ X-Window-System: GNU Network Object Model Environment OpenPGP: id=96B196FE (expiration: 2013-10-26); perference=sign Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:34:14 +0900 In-Reply-To: <1285564594.2397.23.camel@newtao> (kline@thought.org's message of "Sun, 26 Sep 2010 22:16:34 -0700") Message-ID: <86aan34und.fsf@betla.home> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: Gary Kline , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: /var/log/maillog X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 05:34:27 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable kline writes: > On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 13:54 +0900, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote: >> Gary Kline writes: >>=20 >> > Here is a snippet of maillog. mutt still exiting with an 'Exec Error' >> > >> > >> > Sep 26 11:13:47 ethic dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=3D, meth= od=3DPLAIN, rip=3D10.47.0.230, lip=3D10.47.0.230, TLS >> > Sep 26 11:14:48 ethic dovecot: IMAP(kline): Connection closed bytes=3D= 824/490 >> > Sep 26 11:15:07 ethic sm-mta[15070]: ruleset=3Dcheck_relay, arg1=3D109= .106.10.75.sumtel.ua, arg2=3D127.0.0.4, relay=3D109.106.10.75.sumtel.ua [10= 9.106.10.75], reject=3D550 5.7.1 Rejected: 109.106.10.75 listed at sbl-xbl.= spamhaus.org >> > p1 11:15 [4598]=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20= =20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20=20 >> > >> > anybody? >>=20 >> Gary, just use smart host to google. That's powerful! >>=20 >> Sincerely, > > Actually, I have started using google to search for all types of > things, :-) The above is still a mystery tho. In first you need to understand about 'smart host'. Have a look at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smart_host Sincerely, =2D-=20 =EC=86=8C=EC=97=AC=EB=AC=BC =ED=99=A9=EB=B3=91=ED=9D=AC(=E9=BB=83=E7=82=B3= =E7=86=99) | .. =EC=B6=9C=ED=95=AD 15=EB=B6=84=EC=A0=84.. "That's OK. I just wanted to talk to you." -- Johnny Fontane, "Chapter 12", page 159 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.15 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkygLNsACgkQsCouaZaxlv6Y5QCguyVJEkh2D2TRhUqT9io2CT8k +csAn397ecp6v/GWRESSsCcr8ehs06Qa =QlDk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 05:35:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FE431065672 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 05:35:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@boosten.org) Received: from smtpq2.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq2.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.34.165]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F498FC21 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 05:35:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.54.34.140] (helo=smtp9.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq2.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P06NW-0000qn-Ow for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 07:35:54 +0200 Received: from 54193b12.cm-5-2a.dynamic.ziggo.nl ([84.25.59.18] helo=ra.egypt.nl) by smtp9.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P06NW-0000XK-2m for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 07:35:54 +0200 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (xp.egypt.nl [192.168.13.35]) by ra.egypt.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8411A3983B for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 07:35:53 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4CA02D42.9040806@boosten.org> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 07:36:02 +0200 From: Peter Boosten User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20100926182200.GA40516@thought.org> <86mxr34wi3.fsf@betla.home> <1285564594.2397.23.camel@newtao> In-Reply-To: <1285564594.2397.23.camel@newtao> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-ID: 1P06NW-0000XK-2m X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-SpamCheck: geen spam, SpamAssassin (niet cached, score=-0.24, vereist 5, BAYES_20 -0.74, CM_META_TB_NOARR 0.50, NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP 0.00, SPF_PASS -0.00) X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-From: peter@boosten.org X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Re: /var/log/maillog X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 05:35:56 -0000 On 27-9-2010 7:16, kline wrote: > On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 13:54 +0900, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote: >> Gary Kline writes: >> >>> Here is a snippet of maillog. mutt still exiting with an 'Exec Error' >>> >>> >>> Sep 26 11:13:47 ethic dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=, method=PLAIN, rip=10.47.0.230, lip=10.47.0.230, TLS >>> Sep 26 11:14:48 ethic dovecot: IMAP(kline): Connection closed bytes=824/490 >>> Sep 26 11:15:07 ethic sm-mta[15070]: ruleset=check_relay, arg1=109.106.10.75.sumtel.ua, arg2=127.0.0.4, relay=109.106.10.75.sumtel.ua [109.106.10.75], reject=550 5.7.1 Rejected: 109.106.10.75 listed at sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org >>> p1 11:15 [4598] >>> >>> anybody? >> >> Gary, just use smart host to google. That's powerful! >> >> Sincerely, > > Actually, I have started using google to search for all types of > things, :-) The above is still a mystery tho. > > There's nothing in the log snippet above that would explain, nor indicate why/that your mutt died. Peter -- http://www.boosten.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 05:59:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0383106566C for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 05:59:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from ethic.thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52C708FC18 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 05:59:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.47.0.110] (newtao.thought.org [10.47.0.110]) (authenticated bits=0) by ethic.thought.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o8R5xQhx062646; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 22:59:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) From: kline To: Peter Boosten In-Reply-To: <4CA02D42.9040806@boosten.org> References: <20100926182200.GA40516@thought.org> <86mxr34wi3.fsf@betla.home> <1285564594.2397.23.camel@newtao> <4CA02D42.9040806@boosten.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Organization: Thought Unlimited Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 22:59:20 -0700 Message-ID: <1285567160.2397.44.camel@newtao> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.9 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, NORMAL_HTTP_TO_IP, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on ethic.thought.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /var/log/maillog X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 05:59:32 -0000 On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 07:36 +0200, Peter Boosten wrote: > On 27-9-2010 7:16, kline wrote: > > On Mon, 2010-09-27 at 13:54 +0900, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote: > >> Gary Kline writes: > >> > >>> Here is a snippet of maillog. mutt still exiting with an 'Exec Error' > >>> > >>> > >>> Sep 26 11:13:47 ethic dovecot: imap-login: Login: user=, method=PLAIN, rip=10.47.0.230, lip=10.47.0.230, TLS > >>> Sep 26 11:14:48 ethic dovecot: IMAP(kline): Connection closed bytes=824/490 > >>> Sep 26 11:15:07 ethic sm-mta[15070]: ruleset=check_relay, arg1=109.106.10.75.sumtel.ua, arg2=127.0.0.4, relay=109.106.10.75.sumtel.ua [109.106.10.75], reject=550 5.7.1 Rejected: 109.106.10.75 listed at sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org > >>> p1 11:15 [4598] > >>> > >>> anybody? > >> > >> Gary, just use smart host to google. That's powerful! > >> > >> Sincerely, > > > > Actually, I have started using google to search for all types of > > things, :-) The above is still a mystery tho. > > > > > > There's nothing in the log snippet above that would explain, nor > indicate why/that your mutt died. > > Peter > Right. But this was the second time [[i _think_]. My friend fixed it by rebuilding a couple of utilities, one was SpamAssassin. I found that SA was entirely missing [??!??]. After centuries of fmessing around downloading out-of-date and otherwise missing source code---this thanks to using my desktop KDE/Gnome utilities and copying then over to /usr/ports/distfiles and finally building SpamAssassin and updating lots of other stuff, mail worked. I didn't believe it at first. I sent a slew of test messages back <-> forth to me on magnesium.net and other places. When my mail reached freebsd.-test, i knew things worked. It's live and learn; it's try until you want to punch your first thru the wall [then don't and focus at the problem at hand.] I am trying to unite FreeBSD and Ubuntu. It's time to give away my old Dell and then to see if I can lose the pfSense firewall. I figure on several months' worth of head-banging... . gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://thought.org Public Service Unix The 7.83a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org http://journey.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 06:21:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4652F106566B for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 06:21:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 084E68FC19 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 06:21:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-226-229.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.226.229]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF7F3D2F2; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 08:21:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id o8R6LPtU002224; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 08:21:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 08:21:24 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Byung-Hee HWANG Message-Id: <20100927082124.380340a4.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <86mxr34wi3.fsf@betla.home> References: <20100926182200.GA40516@thought.org> <86mxr34wi3.fsf@betla.home> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Gary Kline , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: /var/log/maillog X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 06:21:35 -0000 On Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:54:12 +0900, Byung-Hee HWANG wrote: > Gary, just use smart host to google. That's powerful! Yes, trust all your personal data, your freedom and your thoughts to Big Brother, erm, big google. Oops, I didn't say anything, and Thinkpol will take care of me soon. :-) Seriously now. If you want your mails to be "signed" by an "accepted" IP, the suggestion of defining a smart host is not bad. Check if your ISP does provide a mail relay accessible from within your subnet. Then use this MX in your sendmail configuration so that every outgoing mail is just forwarded to that MX and sent from it. At least, that's how I currently keep things (I'm lazy). Simply code something like define(`SMART_HOST', `mx.foo.bar') into your sendmail mc file. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 06:37:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F26F2106566C for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 06:37:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from serian.mail@yandex.kz) Received: from forward7.mail.yandex.net (forward7.mail.yandex.net [77.88.61.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A58C28FC17 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 06:37:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from web113.yandex.ru (web113.yandex.ru [77.88.60.180]) by forward7.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 815781B09665 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:19:18 +0400 (MSD) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.ru; s=mail; t=1285568358; bh=DwtnRhRb7ygiZyAiqurFHSKu2AKj5cPepBysYczAqPE=; h=From:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Message-Id:Date: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type; b=NXV+XEOVR+XXY+FFgKwmGI7vwwDcGKw4QoFfaQaUq6WFpsaqU1xcH/aSSHTEB0Z+p +7r3jT9M7/ZfQRaAe83ooeOL6zVR1IyeVeXccP7CrQvup3Xyp/Q393R2Mv+m11XU9n 2+DRKsl+T7HpS/Be8ZLoNfAl7lBp0Bf1b8EPkZ4U= Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by web113.yandex.ru (Yandex) with ESMTP id 7CBA847809A for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:19:18 +0400 (MSD) X-Yandex-Spam: 0 X-Yandex-Front: web113.yandex.ru X-Yandex-TimeMark: 1285568358 Received: from [88.204.227.138] ([88.204.227.138]) by mail.yandex.ru with HTTP; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:19:17 +0400 From: serian serian To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <608081285568357@web113.yandex.ru> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:19:17 +0500 X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain Subject: ipfw+torrent X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 06:37:13 -0000 Hi, before I begin write my problem, sorry for my english(if anyone speak russian it would be good). So, here is I want to install on my gw/router FreeBSD 8.1 release in the next week. And in my home net I have torrent clients, how can I do speed limiting for only torrent connections. I'll use ipfw firewall and nat. Best reagrds, Abzal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 06:49:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3FFD1065679 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 06:49:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CDA48FC12 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 06:49:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id o8R6nqGW055186 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 26 Sep 2010 23:49:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id o8R6nqAH055185; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 23:49:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA20578; Sun, 26 Sep 10 23:47:14 PDT Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 23:47:14 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr, m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk Message-Id: <4ca03df2.lQjjNnRah4BJhw4Y%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <20100926123019.GA41450@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <4C9F3BBA.2060809@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4C9F3BBA.2060809@infracaninophile.co.uk> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Free BSD 8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 06:49:53 -0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 26/09/2010 13:30:19, Michel Talon wrote: > > Matthew Seaman said > >> Be aware that installing the ports tree from the DVD images > >> is not the ideal way to do it ... it is better to ... grab > >> an up-to-date copy of the ports directly from the net. > > > > I disagree with that ... Another option is to install > > the ports tree from the DVD,and install corresponding > > precompiled packages ... and *not* updating the ports > > tree ... I suspect the best results can be had from an approach in between these; details below. > ... being up-to-date with the ports tree generally *does* > give you better results than not. > Ports are a moving target, dependent entirely on upstream changes. This last is an oversimplification. Not all ports even _have_ an upstream, and those that do (granted, the great majority) depend not only on upstream changes but also on the maintainer's and committers' ability to keep up with those changes. > Expecting that a snapshot taken months or weeks ago will work > just as well as one updated in the last hour is plain daft ... > ported software generally does improve over time. Updates that > fix problems are way more common that updates that introduce them > ... Couldn't this as well be said of FreeBSD itself? If it were universally accepted, there would be no need for the stable or security branches and the considerable effort that goes into maintaining them: everyone would just run -CURRENT. One _huge_ advantage of starting with a release _and its corresponding set of ports & packages_ is that everything is self-consistent. This tends not to be true of snapshots taken between releases, if only because no one has time to do that much release engineering for every update of every port. I tried to follow the OP's approach a few years ago, and got burned rather badly. By the time I had the system working well enough to start on the project I had intended to work on, the time budgeted for the setup _and_ the work had been almost entirely consumed in setup! I get the impression that M. Talon may have had similar experiences. I've recently started on a new system, and am planning to install 8.1-RELEASE, including the corresponding ports tree; then install what ports I can from packages and also fetch the corresponding distfiles; and finally build -- from release-corresponding ports -- any that aren't available as packages or where I want non-default OPTION settings. That approach should avoid most nasty surprises while getting things set up and working. _After_ everything is installed and configured properly will be plenty soon enough to consider whether any ports need to be updated -- and the already- installed-and-working package collection will provide a fallback in case of trouble trying to build any updated versions. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 06:49:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C2751065673 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 06:49:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CCAD8FC14 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 06:49:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id o8R6nrHx055196 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 26 Sep 2010 23:49:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id o8R6nrPl055195; Sun, 26 Sep 2010 23:49:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA20605; Sun, 26 Sep 10 23:47:36 PDT Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 23:47:36 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: FreeBSD@insightbb.com Message-Id: <4ca03e08.epDeUCUsR+KJ6P/w%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <201009261247.30582.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> In-Reply-To: <201009261247.30582.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sudo anomaly X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 06:49:54 -0000 Steven Friedrich wrote: > ... tried sudo mail. I got root's mailbox nd I deleted all but two > emails. When I q(uit) mail, it said it saved 2 messages in mbox. > But when I try to go back in it says I don't have any mail. There > is no root directory in /var/mail. > > Did sudo lose my mbox? "mbox" != the (input) system mailbox. Chances are, those 2 messages are in /root/mbox From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 08:14:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DAFA106564A for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 08:14:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gulenler@boun.edu.tr) Received: from ispinoz.cc.boun.edu.tr (ispinoz.cc.boun.edu.tr [193.140.192.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD2AA8FC08 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 08:14:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [193.140.192.139] (excalibur.cco.boun.edu.tr [193.140.192.139]) (Authenticated sender: gulenler) by ispinoz.cc.boun.edu.tr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8201066C8A1 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:14:26 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <4CA05262.3040405@boun.edu.tr> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:14:26 +0300 From: Berk Gulenler Organization: Bogazici University Computer Center User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Page Fault While in Kernel Mode (IPNAT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gulenler@boun.edu.tr List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 08:14:29 -0000 Hi, I have a firewall for NAT operations only. While doing NAT, server crashes. Below you can find the required info about my problem. Thanks. Some useful info about my NAT server: FreeBSD xxx.cc.boun.edu.tr 7.3-RELEASE FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE #2: Fri Sep 17 15:09:54 EEST 2010 xxx@xxx.cc.boun.edu.tr:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/FW i386 bge0: mem 0xfdef0000-0xfdefffff irq 25 at device 1.0 on pci3 bge1: mem 0xfdee0000-0xfdeeffff irq 26 at device 1.1 on pci3 net.inet.ipf.ipf_natrules_sz: 127 net.inet.ipf.ipf_nattable_sz: 300000 513/897/1410 mbufs in use (current/cache/total) 512/540/1052/0 mbuf clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 512/512 mbuf+clusters out of packet secondary zone in use (current/cache) 0/5/5/12800 4k (page size) jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 0/0/0/6400 9k jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 0/0/0/3200 16k jumbo clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) 1152K/1324K/2476K bytes allocated to network (current/cache/total) 0/0/0 requests for mbufs denied (mbufs/clusters/mbuf+clusters) 0/0/0 requests for jumbo clusters denied (4k/9k/16k) 0/5/6656 sfbufs in use (current/peak/max) 0 requests for sfbufs denied 0 requests for sfbufs delayed 0 requests for I/O initiated by sendfile 0 calls to protocol drain routines mapped in 183625863 out 126618997 added 2265807 expired 1350387 no memory 8899 bad nat 12314 inuse 13690 orphans 0 rules 49 wilds 0 hash efficiency 97.64% bucket usage 4.46% minimal length 0 maximal length 3 average length 1.024 TCP Entries per state 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 42 2236 51 417 3311 348 200 23 20 0 3763 729 Debug info: GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i386-marcel-freebsd"... Unread portion of the kernel message buffer: Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 0; apic id = 00 fault virtual address = 0x4 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x20:0x8593c94b stack pointer = 0x28:0x853488dc frame pointer = 0x28:0x85348958 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 25 (irq26: bge1) trap number = 12 panic: page fault cpuid = 0 Uptime: 2d0h6m24s Physical memory: 2035 MB Dumping 335 MB: 320 304 288 272 256 240 224 208 192 176 160 144 128 112 96 80 64 48 32 16 Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/acpi.ko...Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/acpi.ko.symbols...done. done. Loaded symbols for /boot/kernel/acpi.ko Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/ipl.ko...Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/ipl.ko.symbols...done. done. Loaded symbols for /boot/kernel/ipl.ko #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:196 196 __asm __volatile("movl %%fs:0,%0" : "=r" (td)); ####################################################################################################### #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:196 #1 0x80746017 in boot (howto=260) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:418 #2 0x807462e9 in panic (fmt=Variable "fmt" is not available. ) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:574 #3 0x8097483c in trap_fatal (frame=0x8534889c, eva=4) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:950 #4 0x80974aa0 in trap_pfault (frame=0x8534889c, usermode=0, eva=4) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:863 #5 0x80975459 in trap (frame=0x8534889c) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:541 #6 0x8095915b in calltrap () at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:166 #7 0x8593c94b in nat_new (fin=0x853489c0, np=0x855ee800, natsave=0x0, flags=Variable "flags" is not available. ) at /usr/src/sys/modules/ipfilter/../../contrib/ipfilter/netinet/ip_nat.c:2577 #8 0x8593cf04 in fr_checknatout (fin=0x853489c0, passp=0x85348a6c) at /usr/src/sys/modules/ipfilter/../../contrib/ipfilter/netinet/ip_nat.c:3828 #9 0x85959c6c in fr_check (ip=0x873c0810, hlen=20, ifp=0x855b7400, out=1, mp=0x85348ab8) at /usr/src/sys/modules/ipfilter/../../contrib/ipfilter/netinet/fil.c:2624 #10 0x859517be in fr_check_wrapper (arg=0x0, mp=0x85348ab8, ifp=0x855b7400, dir=2) at /usr/src/sys/modules/ipfilter/../../contrib/ipfilter/netinet/ip_fil_freebsd.c:178 #11 0x807f5708 in pfil_run_hooks (ph=0x80b026e0, mp=0x85348b44, ifp=0x855b7400, dir=2, inp=0x0) at /usr/src/sys/net/pfil.c:78 #12 0x8080ea72 in ip_output (m=0x85b2a800, opt=0x0, ro=0x85348b7c, flags=1, imo=0x0, inp=0x0) at /usr/src/sys/netinet/ip_output.c:443 #13 0x8080bb04 in ip_forward (m=0x85b2a800, srcrt=0) at /usr/src/sys/netinet/ip_input.c:1366 #14 0x8080d0b0 in ip_input (m=0x85b2a800) at /usr/src/sys/netinet/ip_input.c:609 #15 0x807f3ea5 in netisr_dispatch (num=2, m=0x85b2a800) at /usr/src/sys/net/netisr.c:185 #16 0x807e7b51 in ether_demux (ifp=0x855b7400, m=0x85b2a800) at /usr/src/sys/net/if_ethersubr.c:834 #17 0x807e7f43 in ether_input (ifp=0x855b7400, m=0x85b2a800) at /usr/src/sys/net/if_ethersubr.c:692 #18 0x80529582 in bge_rxeof (sc=0x855c4000, rx_prod=317, holdlck=1) at /usr/src/sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c:3392 #19 0x8052b602 in bge_intr (xsc=0x855c4000) at /usr/src/sys/dev/bge/if_bge.c:3653 #20 0x8072285b in ithread_loop (arg=0x855b97a0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_intr.c:1181 #21 0x8071eff9 in fork_exit (callout=0x807226b0 , arg=0x855b97a0, frame=0x85348d38) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_fork.c:811 #22 0x809591d0 in fork_trampoline () at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:271 ####################################################################################################### 0x8593c94b is in nat_new (/usr/src/sys/modules/ipfilter/../../contrib/ipfilter/netinet/ip_nat.c:2577). 2572 nat->nat_ifps[1] = np->in_ifps[1]; 2573 nat->nat_ptr = np; 2574 nat->nat_p = fin->fin_p; 2575 nat->nat_mssclamp = np->in_mssclamp; 2576 if (nat->nat_p == IPPROTO_TCP) 2577 nat->nat_seqnext[0] = ntohl(tcp->th_seq); 2578 2579 if ((np->in_apr != NULL) && ((ni->nai_flags & NAT_SLAVE) == 0)) 2580 if (appr_new(fin, nat) == -1) 2581 return -1; -- Berk Gulenler System Administrator Bogazici University Computer Center Phone: +90 212 359 47 16 Fax: +90 212 257 50 21 E-mail: gulenler@boun.edu.tr From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 08:52:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CCE31065673 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 08:52:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nr1c0re@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 458918FC22 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 08:52:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwd6 with SMTP id 6so3195990qwd.13 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 01:52:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=xcT7uxXLvt2BnS2Q0+BOtfDINBDi1ZMedLdiCqd/1o0=; b=az2XLq0chdxgbg1+E64jpLGFY0KZmokcQ40yYtR9W+Z6adTaWp6ymLSZS1zNxkGHJo rLyy26uJX/Hdn6NGizCRTzscjk78Mz9kiKHKYtzfJcMUIvWDQOZujg4lSqTIdKL1W2Lg 2/DMgDYyP/W5eNp8aervCvF3dUfOkZgMnzNHM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=gn50i1rCbIOJ9Q7GpGrSkFhY1cNTwiAiLui0zlEin7qfseT6buj9MIr74XDvhjSww0 pOL3xJd/L2cReWvsT7fVGaPv+FQqgYwLO2q44uiCbcAcxdeQOLz0pOn/xRm/ESdLNUXn Mc4XAErO2iOmRaQD5maUNUE7mcIJ0LE4ZTF0g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.71.209 with SMTP id i17mr5289298qaj.282.1285576173341; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 01:29:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.214.142 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 01:29:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:29:33 +0400 Message-ID: From: c0re To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: freebsd-update 8.1 to 8.1-p1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 08:52:22 -0000 Hello freebsd-questions! I've installed freebsd 8.1 and made freebsd-update fetch freebsd-update install reboot And in uname -a I still see 8.1-RELEASE, but I want to see 8.1-RELEASE-p1. In /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh I see that it is 8.1-p1 REVISION="8.1" BRANCH="RELEASE-p1" Why is it so? I want to know that my system is up to date with freebsd-update, but uname -a does not show this to me. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 09:16:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35F211065672 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:16:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from relay.pcl-ipout01.plus.net (relay.pcl-ipout01.plus.net [212.159.7.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 607BD8FC08 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:16:30 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ah0FAK/9n0zUnw4T/2dsb2JhbACUMY4AccUmhUQE Received: from outmx04.plus.net ([212.159.14.19]) by relay.pcl-ipout01.plus.net with ESMTP; 27 Sep 2010 10:16:28 +0100 Received: from helix.plus.com ([84.92.153.232] helo=curlew.milibyte.co.uk) by outmx04.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1P09oy-0003CV-AP for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:16:28 +0100 Received: by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P09ox-0000Yq-0D for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:16:27 +0100 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:16:26 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <20100926123019.GA41450@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <4C9F3BBA.2060809@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4ca03df2.lQjjNnRah4BJhw4Y%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <4ca03df2.lQjjNnRah4BJhw4Y%perryh@pluto.rain.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201009271016.26902.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Re: Free BSD 8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:16:31 -0000 On Monday 27 September 2010, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > I've recently started on a new system, and am planning to install > 8.1-RELEASE, including the corresponding ports tree; then install > what ports I can from packages and also fetch the corresponding > distfiles; and finally build -- from release-corresponding ports -- > any that aren't available as packages or where I want non-default > OPTION settings. =A0That approach should avoid most nasty surprises > while getting things set up and working. =A0_After_ everything is > installed and configured properly will be plenty soon enough to > consider whether any ports need to be updated -- and the already- > installed-and-working package collection will provide a fallback > in case of trouble trying to build any updated versions. The problem is if/when you need to update a port as a result of a=20 security advisory. If your ports tree is very much out of date then=20 it's likely that updating that one port will require a number of=20 dependencies to be updated as well, sometimes all the ports depending=20 on one or more of the updated dependencies need to be updated as well=20 and the resultant bag of worms can take quite a lot of sorting out.=20 The "little and often" approach of keeping the ports tree up to date=20 could be less traumatic. =2D-=20 Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 09:31:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D693106566C for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:31:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from relay.pcl-ipout02.plus.net (relay.pcl-ipout02.plus.net [212.159.7.100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF47C8FC17 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:31:17 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ah0FAG4BoEzUnw4U/2dsb2JhbACUMI4AccU6hUQE Received: from outmx08.plus.net ([212.159.14.20]) by relay.pcl-ipout02.plus.net with ESMTP; 27 Sep 2010 10:31:16 +0100 Received: from helix.plus.com ([84.92.153.232] helo=curlew.milibyte.co.uk) by outmx08.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1P0A3H-000369-VS for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:31:16 +0100 Received: by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P0A3G-0000aQ-K2 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:31:14 +0100 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:31:14 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <4C9F74DD.6000009@nagual.nl> <20100926170530.GA32854@slackbox.erewhon.net> In-Reply-To: <20100926170530.GA32854@slackbox.erewhon.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201009271031.14526.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Re: port upgrading X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:31:18 -0000 On Sunday 26 September 2010, Roland Smith wrote: > If you are upgrading to another major version of FreeBSD (say 7.x to > 8.x), make a list of all used ports with `portmaster -l >ports.list`. > Then delete all ports before updating the system. After the update, > re-install the 'root' and 'leaf' ports from ports.list. A more convenient approach is to run 'portmaster --list-origins' which produces a list of root and leaf ports which you can feed back into portmaster when reinstalling the ports, all the other dependencies should sort themselves out. There is a good description of this in the final example near the bottom of the portmaster man page. -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 09:56:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D66106564A for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:56:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kosin_6@hotmail.com) Received: from snt0-omc4-s4.snt0.hotmail.com (snt0-omc4-s4.snt0.hotmail.com [65.55.90.207]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AABF8FC16 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:56:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from SNT139-W30 ([65.55.90.201]) by snt0-omc4-s4.snt0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 27 Sep 2010 02:44:52 -0700 Message-ID: X-Originating-IP: [183.89.66.32] From: kosin kaewnuna To: Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:44:52 +0700 Importance: Normal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 27 Sep 2010 09:44:52.0736 (UTC) FILETIME=[A2735000:01CB5E28] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-874" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Questions ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:56:53 -0000 To FreeBSD Admin. Hi, My name is Mr.Kosin Kaewnuna. I am a graduate student in Bangkok Thailand. I'm doing research on the technologies virtualization, OS-Level virtualization, Para-virtualization I have the following questions about FreeBSD. 1. FreeBSD can be edit host Kernel ? 2. FreeBSD can be installed on Xen Para-virtualization ? How to .. Thank you. For Anser. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 10:35:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B701106566C for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:35:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from relay.ptn-ipout02.plus.net (relay.ptn-ipout02.plus.net [212.159.7.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 133628FC1B for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:35:23 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ah0FAPYPoExUXeb0/2dsb2JhbACUMY4AccUihUQE Received: from outmx03.plus.net ([84.93.230.244]) by relay.ptn-ipout02.plus.net with ESMTP; 27 Sep 2010 11:35:22 +0100 Received: from helix.plus.com ([84.92.153.232] helo=curlew.milibyte.co.uk) by outmx03.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1P0B3J-0005C4-VS for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:35:22 +0100 Received: by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P0B3H-0000kC-LC for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:35:19 +0100 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:35:19 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <201009111442.49114.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> <1284874572.20540.1746.camel@predator-ii.buffyverse> <201009261252.14140.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> In-Reply-To: <201009261252.14140.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201009271135.19590.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Re: apropos returning same item twice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:35:24 -0000 On Sunday 26 September 2010, Steven Friedrich wrote: > > > > Another check is that the output of manpath(1) doesn't > > > > include /usr/X11R6/man. > > > > > > manpath > > > /usr/share/man:/usr/local/man:/usr/local/kde4/man:/usr/share/open > > >ssl/man: > > > /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.12.2/man:/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.12.2/perl/ > > >man > > > > Ok. There's also: > > > > %man -a -w mysql > > > > to see the origins of the multiple man pages, although it seems > > that you may have already confirmed the /usr/X11R6 path connection. > > > > >From what you've presented so far I'd say it's looking like a > > > problem > > man -a -w mysql > /usr/local/man/man1/mysql.1.gz > /usr/X11R6/man/man1/mysql.1.gz Same here - until I realised that I still had /usr/X11R6/bin in $PATH, left over from the days before /usr/X11R6 was a link to /usr/local. Removing /usr/X11R6/bin from $PATH fixed it for me. According to the man page for manpath it "tries to determine the user's manpath from a set of system defaults and the user's PATH". -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 11:00:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7926D1065670 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:00:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbiquez@intranet.com.mx) Received: from intranet.com.mx (intranet.com.mx [200.33.246.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 525B68FC08 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:00:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from PC.intranet.com.mx (189.144.55.117) by intranet.com.mx with ESMTP (EIMS X 3.3.9) for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 06:01:12 -0500 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 06:00:43 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Jorge Biquez Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Message-ID: <3368430072-783133147@intranet.com.mx> X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:21:46 +0000 Subject: OT. Duplicating Disk. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:00:50 -0000 Hello all. This is kind off topic. U have and "old" laptopn, an Acer Travelmate 4670. It has a sata disk, 120Gb. It has been working fine in all these years. I have installed Freebsd with its boot manager and inside has Windows and a distro linux. I choose what OS to use depending on my needs every time I boot. I have decided to give it fresh air and I bought a disk of 500GB. Instead of installing everything again I would like to duplicate entire disk, as is, with its MBR and all partitions for all the different OS's. I bought an USB enclosure that is working fine. The machine recognice the new disk if I attach it as a USB disk (in all OS no problem on that). As a test also I decided to change disks and install somethig, no problem at all. My question is. What would be your advice on what tool to use to duplicate entire disk? (the adjust of size for the partitions of each different OS can be done later, no problem I guess). I was recommend to use DiskImageXML, booting alone and copy the disk but it does not work. Not yet. I guess the problem is that the original disk still has a 4Gb partition with all the Acer tools , the first partition, to recover teh Windows XP origibal system (type or partition EISA). Not sure on that but that program is not working. I receive an error when booting. On my desktop I used to use old Norton Ghost 2003 with my IDE disk and still work fine, but here does not work at all since the USB ports are not recognized. Do you know of a program tool that can be used that boot alone, free if possible or cheap, that let me copy entire disk, as is, that do the job? I am sorry for the kind of off topic and thanks in advance Jorge Biquez From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 11:40:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50A53106566C for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:40:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F20C08FC0A for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:40:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk30 with SMTP id 30so651211qyk.13 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 04:40:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=uYafwklf5jx0cQgp+T9Qj90pKXq+RB7NWRCGT0uyfKI=; b=qS06/+5SJjnxyGKpsMbnKIHJd/MuTljrLunQFNRHrRyiZOzhXfp3xZmVCqOg6jg5qR krEJsfL3AcT3DkoW5YMPOzjJygsIh6TasMA15MuCnTFIVS7TjqFrMUJlNjIu319pvnkV KdRzKtwz6FNmOK09VYolFljusYAXCVaylCGWI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=GL0aVx5JnzbWnHfTXJPh5oInAehe6hhTM7bKUsImK9HN6M8neCnhSNWxD9CF7M10gU wAB9h0xUt+po8nqxQKK3nT2DG2VxrkUoFW62Sue3LZJ4il+TdmU2P5kBgYZV21yzNT2z skinOgeY1Acus37jfcH4v4KMZ+qgEdd7y1nrA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.223.198 with SMTP id il6mr5615323qcb.50.1285587641714; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 04:40:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.215.209 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 04:40:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4C9FB0D2.1010205@DataIX.net> References: <4C9FB0D2.1010205@DataIX.net> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:40:41 +0100 Message-ID: From: krad To: jhell Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Samuel_Mart=EDn_Moro?= , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 11:40:43 -0000 On 26 September 2010 21:45, jhell wrote: > This is more for questions@ or pf@ > > On 09/26/2010 11:43, Samuel Mart=EDn Moro wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Michael Powell >wrote: > > > >> Samuel Mart=EDn Moro wrote: > >> > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> > >>> I'm trying to set up pf on my soon-to-be new gateway (8.1-RELEASE > amd64). > >>> I used the sample configuration file available on > >>> calomel > >>> After a few tests, it appears that the gate has fully access to the > >>> internet, but I can't open connections from clients to distant server= s > >>> (web, ssh, ...). > >>> Checking pflog log file, I can't see anything about those timeouts, > even > >>> if I added the log directive in every block/pass command. > >>> Everything else seems to work, I can talk with my DNS from the > internet, > >>> ssh redirections to another pc also seems to works. > >>> I just can't access the Internet from a client of my network... > >>> > >>> For debugging, I commented out the options and the 'block all in/out' > >>> directives. > >>> > >>> Here's my config file http://pastebin.com/Nim2zBCx > >>> > >>> Is there someone understanding what I'm doing wrong? > >>> > >> The firewall ruleset is a trifle overly complex for a quick glance; > study > >> and analysis would take some doing. However, if you can reach the > internet > >> from the firewall box and other client computers behind your NAT can't > >> (which is what it sounds like you're describing) it may be just that y= ou > >> are > >> missing gateway_enable=3D"YES" in your /etc/rc.conf. > >> > >> Turning this "ON" makes your firewall box into a router. The status of > this > >> can be checked with: sysctl net.inet.ip.forwarding - a "0" means no > >> gateway > >> and a "1" means gateway. > >> > >> -Mike > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >> > > > > the gateway is already enabled (and forwarding is correctly set) > > whatever, I had to do quick, I started again > > I think the missing thing on my old conf was the 'scrub' (at least) > > I made a more simple configuration, as following: > > > > ext_if=3D"bge0" > > int_if=3D"bge1" > > localnet =3D $int_if:network > > emma=3D"10.242.42.200" > > alpha=3D"10.42.42.42" > > delta=3D"10.42.42.44" > > set skip on lo0 > > scrub in on $ext_if all fragment reassemble > > #INTERNETZ > > nat on $ext_if from $localnet to any -> ($ext_if) > > #EMMA > > rdr on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to ($ext_if) port 1101 -= > > > $emma port 22 > > rdr on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to ($ext_if) port 307 -> > > $emma port 80 > > #WHAT.CD > > rdr on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to ($ext_if) port 1666 -= > > > $alpha port 1666 > > #REMOTE ADM > > rdr on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to ($ext_if) port 1667 -= > > > $delta port 22 > > rdr on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to ($ext_if) port 1668 -= > > > $alpha port 22 > > pass in log on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to $ext_if port 22 > > pass in log on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to $ext_if port 53 > > pass in log on $ext_if inet proto udp from any to $ext_if port 53 > > pass in log on $ext_if inet proto tcp from any to $ext_if port 1664 > > pass in log on $int_if inet proto tcp from any to any > > pass in log on $int_if inet proto udp from any to any > > block in log on $ext_if inet proto icmp from any to $ext_if > > > > it's basically working > > i'll stuff it when I'll have time. > > > > Samuel Mart=EDn Moro > > {EPITECH.} tek5 > > > -- > > jhell,v > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > its worth doing as restart on pf rather than a reload. Ive seen nat rules not take affect sometimes on reloads From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 12:07:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 672A61065693 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:07:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from mail.gelita.se (212-162-182-244.skbbip.com [212.162.182.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 268D98FC26 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:07:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.gelita.se (localhost.gelita.se [127.0.0.1]) by mail.gelita.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF83010EDFF; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:07:54 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at troback.com Received: from mail.gelita.se ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.gelita.se (mail.gelita.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y+ujjBPUFCSE; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:07:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from bljbsd01.no-ip.org (c-195-216-040-164.static.bjare.net [195.216.40.164]) by mail.gelita.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id D59D610E50A; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:07:48 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4CA088F0.90303@eskk.nu> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:07:12 +0200 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; sv-SE; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100918 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jorge Biquez References: <3368430072-783133147@intranet.com.mx> In-Reply-To: <3368430072-783133147@intranet.com.mx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT. Duplicating Disk. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:07:22 -0000 On 2010-09-28 13:00, Jorge Biquez wrote: > Hello all. > > This is kind off topic. > > U have and "old" laptopn, an Acer Travelmate 4670. It has a sata disk, > 120Gb. It has been working fine in all these years. I have installed > Freebsd with its boot manager and inside has Windows and a distro linux. > I choose what OS to use depending on my needs every time I boot. > > I have decided to give it fresh air and I bought a disk of 500GB. > Instead of installing everything again I would like to duplicate entire > disk, as is, with its MBR and all partitions for all the different OS's. > I bought an USB enclosure that is working fine. The machine recognice > the new disk if I attach it as a USB disk (in all OS no problem on > that). As a test also I decided to change disks and install somethig, no > problem at all. > > My question is. What would be your advice on what tool to use to > duplicate entire disk? (the adjust of size for the partitions of each > different OS can be done later, no problem I guess). > > I was recommend to use DiskImageXML, booting alone and copy the disk but > it does not work. Not yet. > > I guess the problem is that the original disk still has a 4Gb partition > with all the Acer tools , the first partition, to recover teh Windows XP > origibal system (type or partition EISA). Not sure on that but that > program is not working. I receive an error when booting. > On my desktop I used to use old Norton Ghost 2003 with my IDE disk and > still work fine, but here does not work at all since the USB ports are > not recognized. > > Do you know of a program tool that can be used that boot alone, free if > possible or cheap, that let me copy entire disk, as is, that do the job? > > I am sorry for the kind of off topic and thanks in advance > > Jorge Biquez > I've done what you want to do. Using the PartedMagic CD. http://partedmagic.com/ On the cd is the program Ghost4Linux. It can image disks with UFS partitions as well as long as you don't need to resize them. /Leslie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 14:01:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61EA51065742 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:01:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phanquochien@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com (mail-ww0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E55A98FC14 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:01:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so116672wwi.1 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 07:01:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=5ilhuEGio5SV16Fb7isRdckglm2aCWBw9epaWHb794c=; b=EWg5s/oor6PfrktvWTlKZFttFVU7cbNYNpXxOcp98CqrMAkllEuFsIlHsxSPanGyu/ XrOz9k9fMbsuNHJ0vWz3BBvwMyOCpKgIrtqPnoVI/1qzSD2XvFyeWFdmMUMV1eKh0Vz8 V6QielD1LPuYnIu1C61HLzx8g5Ymxdlnz3alc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ctDix2Xo70G6oIBmtjpRYJNhX4Y8NL1Gd6vmhMpz/hCmzJKS0XZEyPnBS4hylvpdT3 2tc6UYHjQI32eAiffURMwiNkOfvg1p23JaP2brwq1kOcmkXYDcht+snxTKFhlZh+OJy6 BtAsQETXAerneh6JPmU6yb1iCKgqs5LPOp80Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.133.7 with SMTP id d7mr6632031wbt.54.1285596099001; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 07:01:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.142.194 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 07:01:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:01:38 +0700 Message-ID: From: Phan Quoc Hien To: c0re Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-update 8.1 to 8.1-p1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:01:44 -0000 Try rebuild your kernel and get 8.1-RELEASE-p1! I did it! On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 3:29 PM, c0re wrote: > Hello freebsd-questions! > > I've installed freebsd 8.1 and made > freebsd-update fetch > freebsd-update install > reboot > > And in uname -a I still see 8.1-RELEASE, but I want to see 8.1-RELEASE-p1. > > In /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh I see that it is 8.1-p1 > > REVISION="8.1" > BRANCH="RELEASE-p1" > > Why is it so? I want to know that my system is up to date with > freebsd-update, but uname -a does not show this to me. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Mr.Hien E-mail: phanquochien@gmail.com Website: www.mrhien.info From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 14:30:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAE2410656A3 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:30:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nr1c0re@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A67848FC08 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:30:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk8 with SMTP id 8so1920880gxk.13 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 07:30:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=YiuHUTqf7EZUb0+bQVasW2eCvPNpoDi8Vi/CFnAjThs=; b=lWbPmddb0/Awzi4gg3/OMacw6fsT/BfJrLrL8q60NKvZ0SlcRFDAfx88RP+E4agM5l R6yt2QzJVTvdvDw/9Izch31uNTqIgkyMRJXcVT/qTLD/yWASq8Gheb+fy8uKstFWzTLd ZUpq/BxT9NbrW6LQRFWILnDp4w8S/2Qg/uRRg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=KuxhWtQ+lyPALGAIE/8+2kRVbFy7Y6lF9tHe0iCUz3XLS8ndETM5K83Zj2urwzZm/z INoSK5LLgq1yWPqyaflg4Nt6dstFfzI4a+YV/sWI/j6mcYSvZsJVvh8V3FuzdwLdG8HB 5DSpDG+6YESkQnLO1dVnxr6n9/0oHoaWFffY8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.104.8 with SMTP id b8mr5533198agc.91.1285597844026; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 07:30:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.10.19 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 07:30:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 18:30:43 +0400 Message-ID: From: c0re To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: freebsd-update 8.1 to 8.1-p1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:30:46 -0000 But freebsd-update should do it. Rebuilding kernel will prevent from further freebsd-update patches to rebuilded GENERIC. 2010/9/27 Phan Quoc Hien : > Try rebuild your kernel and get 8.1-RELEASE-p1! I did it! > > On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 3:29 PM, c0re wrote: >> >> Hello freebsd-questions! >> >> I've installed freebsd 8.1 and made >> freebsd-update fetch >> freebsd-update install >> reboot >> >> And in uname -a I still see 8.1-RELEASE, but I want to see 8.1-RELEASE-p1. >> >> In /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh I see that it is 8.1-p1 >> >> REVISION="8.1" >> BRANCH="RELEASE-p1" >> >> Why is it so? I want to know that my system is up to date with >> freebsd-update, but uname -a does not show this to me. >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > -- > Mr.Hien > E-mail: phanquochien@gmail.com > Website: www.mrhien.info > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 14:40:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37F6B106564A for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:40:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhelfman@e-e.com) Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (mail.experts-exchange.com [72.29.183.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 181838FC13 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:40:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.experts-exchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA008F2F2ED; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 07:40:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at experts-exchange.com Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.experts-exchange.com (mail.experts-exchange.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X4Ru2VkEiAjt; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 07:40:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eggman.experts-exchange.com (unknown [76.209.222.32]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jhelfman) by mail.experts-exchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 43561F2F319; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 07:40:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by eggman.experts-exchange.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, _d Sep 2010 07:42:14 -0700 Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 07:42:14 -0700 From: Jason To: Phan Quoc Hien Message-ID: <20100927144214.GA57011@Jason-Helfmans-MacBook-Pro.local> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: Darwin 10.4.0 X-Living-The-Dream: I love the SLO Life! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: c0re , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-update 8.1 to 8.1-p1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:40:26 -0000 On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 09:01:38PM +0700, Phan Quoc Hien thus spake: >Try rebuild your kernel and get 8.1-RELEASE-p1! I did it! > >On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 3:29 PM, c0re wrote: > >> Hello freebsd-questions! >> >> I've installed freebsd 8.1 and made >> freebsd-update fetch >> freebsd-update install >> reboot >> >> And in uname -a I still see 8.1-RELEASE, but I want to see 8.1-RELEASE-p1. >> >> In /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh I see that it is 8.1-p1 >> >> REVISION="8.1" >> BRANCH="RELEASE-p1" >> >> Why is it so? I want to know that my system is up to date with >> freebsd-update, but uname -a does not show this to me. >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> The kernel wasn't touched during the latest set of security releases, so an update to 8.1-p1 will show your kernel at 8.1. If you perform another freebsd-update, it should show no updates for 8.1-p1. Based on what you are saying, uname is reporting correctly. Other than 'sys/conf/newvers.sh,' if the update touches sys, it should redistribute the kernel and the patch number in the announcement. After it is properly applied, 'uname' should match. I don't recall the reasoning behind newvers.sh in the update software, but others may have an idea. -jgh From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 14:49:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E4051065673 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:49:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nr1c0re@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDA048FC27 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:49:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxn35 with SMTP id 35so1929700yxn.13 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 07:49:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=pcJxnuIipiuFsG2QdNm9APz2hHQl+qwvOJ9A2R0i3rI=; b=P/qQtfCLJBb0JlslKCaNGYEixsBw6RnU8iW8Z+1WJoFQMBxXtkNV7nGlQQgX7SD3Rk sVep1U/3wM8+aVtW+Lot8MAc1lOI6V3okZRDJaI6jjrR6LI0gQTuy5HHSPFQL3SOyjCH /Dn5nVDYI+dIUcR2MdeQOaM9janCsy/Aj+3eA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=h04MYOVEzczT+ZxSvIsRUXJUn0CPdWDPcP8GTHzQu9gQkq9jlcJ/zqApGTjmTEQJVN oSttnTn52rK5CTG11HaqOECnLMiAjgdi12n7c+eCmQBgAjJwYLLDBbJyvMlb6bv6uUwI QHI44pYqaMskwr3kGg2iZo5FWfw12ONWblST0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.89.18 with SMTP id m18mr5975776agb.34.1285598971074; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 07:49:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.10.19 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 07:49:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100927144214.GA57011@Jason-Helfmans-MacBook-Pro.local> References: <20100927144214.GA57011@Jason-Helfmans-MacBook-Pro.local> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 18:49:31 +0400 Message-ID: From: c0re To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: freebsd-update 8.1 to 8.1-p1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:49:32 -0000 Is not "p1" compiled in kernel during make buildkernel operation? If yes, /boot/kernel of 8.1 and /boot/kernel 8.1-p1 must be different. So binary diff of /boot/kernel also must be installed during freebsd-update. It's my opinion. Why not? I think it's not reasonable to have updated system without actually be possible to know that it's really updated. And I think that if you are looking for real patch level of your OS, you will look at uname -a, not in newvers.sh file. Correct me if i'm wrong. 2010/9/27 Jason : > On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 09:01:38PM +0700, Phan Quoc Hien thus spake: >> >> Try rebuild your kernel and get 8.1-RELEASE-p1! I did it! >> >> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 3:29 PM, c0re wrote: >> >>> Hello freebsd-questions! >>> >>> I've installed freebsd 8.1 and made >>> freebsd-update fetch >>> freebsd-update install >>> reboot >>> >>> And in uname -a I still see 8.1-RELEASE, but I want to see >>> 8.1-RELEASE-p1. >>> >>> In /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh I see that it is 8.1-p1 >>> >>> REVISION="8.1" >>> BRANCH="RELEASE-p1" >>> >>> Why is it so? I want to know that my system is up to date with >>> freebsd-update, but uname -a does not show this to me. >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >>> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> > > The kernel wasn't touched during the latest set of security releases, so an > update to 8.1-p1 will show your kernel at 8.1. If you perform another > freebsd-update, it should show no updates for 8.1-p1. > > Based on what you are saying, uname is reporting correctly. > > Other than 'sys/conf/newvers.sh,' if the update touches sys, it should > redistribute the kernel and the patch number in the announcement. After it > is properly applied, 'uname' should match. > > I don't recall the reasoning behind newvers.sh in the update software, but > others may have an idea. > > -jgh > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 15:04:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E9F1106564A for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:04:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sterling@camdensoftware.com) Received: from wh2.interactivevillages.com (wh2.interactivevillages.com [75.125.250.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54F078FC16 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:04:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 97-126-31-96.tukw.qwest.net ([97.126.31.96] helo=_HOSTNAME_) by wh2.interactivevillages.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P0F7F-00088z-Qj for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 07:55:43 -0700 Received: by _HOSTNAME_ (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 27 Sep 2010 08:04:44 -0700 Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 08:04:44 -0700 From: Chip Camden To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100927150444.GA94536@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20100926123019.GA41450@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <4C9F3BBA.2060809@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4ca03df2.lQjjNnRah4BJhw4Y%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <201009271016.26902.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201009271016.26902.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Company: Camden Software Consulting URL: http://camdensoftware.com X-PGP-Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xD6DBAF91 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - wh2.interactivevillages.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - camdensoftware.com Subject: Re: Free BSD 8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:04:50 -0000 --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Quoth Mike Clarke on Monday, 27 September 2010: > On Monday 27 September 2010, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: >=20 > > I've recently started on a new system, and am planning to install > > 8.1-RELEASE, including the corresponding ports tree; then install > > what ports I can from packages and also fetch the corresponding > > distfiles; and finally build -- from release-corresponding ports -- > > any that aren't available as packages or where I want non-default > > OPTION settings. =A0That approach should avoid most nasty surprises > > while getting things set up and working. =A0_After_ everything is > > installed and configured properly will be plenty soon enough to > > consider whether any ports need to be updated -- and the already- > > installed-and-working package collection will provide a fallback > > in case of trouble trying to build any updated versions. >=20 > The problem is if/when you need to update a port as a result of a=20 > security advisory. If your ports tree is very much out of date then=20 > it's likely that updating that one port will require a number of=20 > dependencies to be updated as well, sometimes all the ports depending=20 > on one or more of the updated dependencies need to be updated as well=20 > and the resultant bag of worms can take quite a lot of sorting out.=20 > The "little and often" approach of keeping the ports tree up to date=20 > could be less traumatic. >=20 > --=20 > Mike Clarke That's the maxim under which I operate. Furthermore, if something does break, it's a lot easier to narrow down what broke it if you updated one or two ports instead of twenty or thirty. I use the same principle in following STABLE -- frequently update/build so = if anything goes wrong, the number of culpable commits is small. --=20 Sterling (Chip) Camden | sterling@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F http://camdensoftware.com | http://chipstips.com | http://chipsquips= .com --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMoLKMAAoJEIpckszW26+Rm90IAIuzlokRaK/QQqe/oelE0ykk JnxJNqrJuKhP47dIVgXpRMVxzOeNwjQ3LDgyeT0IADoIjyRVHhJRFYgqMXe/nnRX j8wRwJ/v5XgemWXXvDqyoxHr1Xa6SJo+KgqPbUKpRUluGYTzVcyHCJHNNJNjDr2t cWgcP/eQMk/T206MZEe+nvjOVNr9Hcf8NkKzha12Y74/p/YCkTMVLMB0/t6OYUH8 KK2e7ne+sJGRgxRApiDDN/CIOmESBfjyHjZvZv0ZIUbP0+ortioPONyoMgwfrNeY dznoxV123jRcs1NpBafF2UrBL51YUXFU0cUXLIg5UZCFYU3zerNY95o1knChocw= =VtMd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8t9RHnE3ZwKMSgU+-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 15:25:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA1E71065698 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:25:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A66758FC0C for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:25:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o8RFPmbA095051; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:25:48 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id o8RFPkYv095048; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:25:48 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:25:46 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Jorge Biquez In-Reply-To: <3368430072-783133147@intranet.com.mx> Message-ID: References: <3368430072-783133147@intranet.com.mx> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:25:48 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT. Duplicating Disk. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:25:50 -0000 On Tue, 28 Sep 2010, Jorge Biquez wrote: > U have and "old" laptopn, an Acer Travelmate 4670. It has a sata disk, 120Gb. > It has been working fine in all these years. I have installed Freebsd with > its boot manager and inside has Windows and a distro linux. I choose what OS > to use depending on my needs every time I boot. > ... > > My question is. What would be your advice on what tool to use to duplicate > entire disk? (the adjust of size for the partitions of each different OS can > be done later, no problem I guess). Resizing partitions can be difficult. FreeBSD's ufs has growfs(8), but otherwise resizing is usually done by dumping, resizing, and restoring. Since you have Linux familiarity, I'd suggest http://www.clonezilla.org. It will make a backup of an entire disk, including binary copies of filesystems it doesn't understand, to 2G compressed files. It can also copy device to device. Later versions even recognize and understand UFS filesystems. FreeBSD can also duplicate a disk byte-for-byte with dd(1). Be warned: it will take a while, copying blank space as well as used. Important: make a backup of the original drive somewhere else first (see above). When using dd for this, it's critical that the source and destination devices are correct. To copy ad0 to da0 (make sure the source and destination devices are correct): # dd if=/dev/ad0 of=/dev/da0 bs=1m The same thing can be done with Linux (Clonezilla provides a shell), although the bs parameter has to be 1M (case sensitive). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 15:28:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 695F0106566B for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:28:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhelfman@experts-exchange.com) Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (mail.experts-exchange.com [72.29.183.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4176E8FC0C for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:28:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.experts-exchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F969F2F3A7; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 08:10:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d= experts-exchange.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :content-type:mime-version:user-agent:from:from:subject:subject :date:date:references:in-reply-to:message-id:received:received :received; s=ee; t=1285600237; x=1287414637; bh=ywtMDX1fT5uDFAlX pvTaq9e2MDbe5+aEdJ67vVWCJto=; b=SZWxhdyWkA7pyZsa+H/iTMFPbRLuwbAp I7OyVDiXc0jvPF1gNmvu6g2Jn/1GTxd4s93wodM6Yjw+ajpEamrlJVAIcOU3NU57 jXCQ+stMCd1RY+8+7fQCkLv0vZTlXAWtxkcQ+01Kn9gpePJWN00HldQQm+SP3KId TjEFck5KMXw= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at experts-exchange.com Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.experts-exchange.com (mail.experts-exchange.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tZJ8M8NwIGpJ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 08:10:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.experts-exchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9804F2F39A; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 08:10:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 76.209.222.32 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jhelfman) by mail.experts-exchange.com with HTTP; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 08:10:36 -0700 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: <20100927144214.GA57011@Jason-Helfmans-MacBook-Pro.local> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 08:10:36 -0700 From: jhelfman@experts-exchange.com To: "c0re" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.20 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: Jason , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-update 8.1 to 8.1-p1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:28:32 -0000 > Is not "p1" compiled in kernel during make buildkernel operation? I'm sure it is, but freebsd-update is a binary distribution system, and doesn't build anything on the client. > If yes, /boot/kernel of 8.1 and /boot/kernel 8.1-p1 must be different. > So binary diff of /boot/kernel also must be installed during > freebsd-update. It's my opinion. Why not? > > I think it's not reasonable to have updated system without actually be > possible to know that it's really updated. And I think that if you are > looking for real patch level of your OS, you will look at uname -a, > not in newvers.sh file. > > Correct me if i'm wrong. I believe part of this issue is that if the kernel isn't distributed with a patch, then it needs to be represented somehow. I've heard of some thoughts focusing on reflecting the patch as a sysctl value. > > 2010/9/27 Jason : >> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 09:01:38PM +0700, Phan Quoc Hien thus spake: >>> >>> Try rebuild your kernel and get 8.1-RELEASE-p1! I did it! >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 3:29 PM, c0re wrote: >>> >>>> Hello freebsd-questions! >>>> >>>> I've installed freebsd 8.1 and made >>>> freebsd-update fetch >>>> freebsd-update install >>>> reboot >>>> >>>> And in uname -a I still see 8.1-RELEASE, but I want to see >>>> 8.1-RELEASE-p1. >>>> >>>> In /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh I see that it is 8.1-p1 >>>> >>>> REVISION="8.1" >>>> BRANCH="RELEASE-p1" >>>> >>>> Why is it so? I want to know that my system is up to date with >>>> freebsd-update, but uname -a does not show this to me. >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >>>> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>> >> >> The kernel wasn't touched during the latest set of security releases, so >> an >> update to 8.1-p1 will show your kernel at 8.1. If you perform another >> freebsd-update, it should show no updates for 8.1-p1. >> >> Based on what you are saying, uname is reporting correctly. >> >> Other than 'sys/conf/newvers.sh,' if the update touches sys, it should >> redistribute the kernel and the patch number in the announcement. After >> it >> is properly applied, 'uname' should match. >> >> I don't recall the reasoning behind newvers.sh in the update software, >> but >> others may have an idea. >> >> -jgh >> > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 16:37:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8391D1065670 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:37:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 181868FC14 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:37:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb33 with SMTP id 33so6510016wyb.13 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:37:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.35.77 with SMTP id t55mr13096269wea.0.1285605460026; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:37:40 -0700 (PDT) Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.216.2.14 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:37:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:37:39 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Tk6YATcAJOYocImSuJ8t3Od3U6Y Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: kosin kaewnuna Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Questions ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:37:48 -0000 2010/9/27 kosin kaewnuna : > > To FreeBSD Admin. > > > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Hi, My name is Mr.Kosin Kaewnuna. I am a graduate student= in Bangkok Thailand. > > I'm doing research on the technologies virtualization, OS-Level virtualiz= ation, Para-virtualization > > I have the following questions about FreeBSD. > > > > 1. FreeBSD can be edit host Kernel ? > > > > 2. FreeBSD can be installed on Xen Para-virtualization ? How to .. > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails.html http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/virtualization.ht= ml > > > > Thank you. For Anser. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 16:49:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EA8B106564A for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:49:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from igalgand@freemail.hu) Received: from mail01a.mail.t-online.hu (mail01a.mail.t-online.hu [84.2.40.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 562CA8FC15 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:49:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freebsd02.snowboard.ice (dsl5402076E.pool.t-online.hu [84.2.7.110]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail01a.mail.t-online.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2459279788E for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 18:49:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from freebsd02.snowboard.ice (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freebsd02.snowboard.ice (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o8RGnNuk089739 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 18:49:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from igalgand@freebsd02.snowboard.ice) Received: (from igalgand@localhost) by freebsd02.snowboard.ice (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o8RGnMpj089738 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 18:49:22 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from igalgand) Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 18:49:22 +0200 From: Istvan Galgand To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100927164922.GA89706@freebsd02.snowboard.ice> References: <20100926162643.GA10795@freebsd02.snowboard.ice> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20100926162643.GA10795@freebsd02.snowboard.ice> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: Re: rhythmbox issue X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 16:49:25 -0000 On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 06:26:43PM +0200, Istvan Galgand wrote: > Dear All, > > I've just realized that I can't start Rhythmbox from my Gnome desktop. I've tried to launch it from menu, from terminal, nothing > happens, no error messages appear at all. When I used Rhythmbox last time, lets's say, one or two weeks ago, everything was OK. Today's FreeBSD update solved the issue. Rhythmbox is operating again and doing a very nice job. Thanks, Istvan -- This mail was sent by Mutt-1.4.2.3_5, FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-#0, GENERIC i386 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 17:00:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F12011065672 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:00:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phanquochien@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F2E88FC1E for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:00:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb33 with SMTP id 33so6541031wyb.13 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:00:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=e3GzeVUb1j/1NDhOjmxMyxdSiWDwliMAQTCr/O72UrA=; b=AjdHebnSfIxF59eYehEVQe/KIsiHgI9QsPSFamf1LsQ03BzviWaccZkHODwq0V2Vwj fomz4A2mYRPd7/LFKylMWHTcFW3+cvu3v/u2ZjZUsZERX9B9dLyfc6b9UCNE2CL0YPc5 GCTwMyZYTHZEKqof2VTCS4bNM1tOO6YAZlcSc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=s1iRScokfm948d6mlGrmVhwddeiB2z13vdKvd9VGF/xF8LgY5TpU0sivIaIXVChhv8 G2EasinfTC3gPzouUgzwZPQdsgiaUMC9l6qPbRPP/fvQTIidQkmHQcupDC+sDdbndzN4 2j1yme0msnENEpytjhZNofkJ31pdNcsC3YEaU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.128.18 with SMTP id i18mr6580598wbs.135.1285606811326; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:00:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.142.194 with HTTP; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 10:00:11 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 00:00:11 +0700 Message-ID: From: Phan Quoc Hien To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Prevent symbolic links in pure-ftp! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:00:13 -0000 hi! How to prevent symbolic links in pure-ftp for security issuse? User can access outsite chroot by create symlink: ln -s / abc => and user > can change dir to / > Anyone can solve this problem? Thanks. -- Mr.Hien E-mail: phanquochien@gmail.com Website: www.mrhien.info From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 17:00:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B74210656CE for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:00:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@insightbb.com) Received: from mxsf13.insightbb.com (mxsf13.insightbb.com [74.128.0.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E5848FC1D for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:00:16 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,243,1283745600"; d="scan'208";a="207530989" Received: from unknown (HELO asav01.insightbb.com) ([172.31.249.123]) by mxsf13.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 27 Sep 2010 13:00:14 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AolCAHlqoExKgCiCO2dsb2JhbACHbZomDAEBAQE1LckZgwwKgi4E X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,243,1283745600"; d="scan'208";a="286041497" Received: from 74-128-40-130.dhcp.insightbb.com (HELO laptop2.stevenfriedrich.org) ([74.128.40.130]) by asavout01.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 27 Sep 2010 13:00:14 -0400 From: Steven Friedrich To: Robert Bonomi , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:00:15 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.1-RELEASE; KDE/4.5.1; i386; ; ) References: <201009270321.o8R3Lo47008651@mail.r-bonomi.com> In-Reply-To: <201009270321.o8R3Lo47008651@mail.r-bonomi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201009271300.16095.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> Cc: Subject: Re: sudo anomaly X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:00:17 -0000 On Sunday 26 September 2010 11:21:50 pm you wrote: > > From FreeBSD@insightbb.com Sun Sep 26 18:14:09 2010 > > From: Steven Friedrich > > To: Robert Bonomi > > Subject: Re: sudo anomaly > > Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 19:16:00 -0400 > > > > On Sunday 26 September 2010 2:38:06 pm you wrote: > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sun Sep 26 11:46:43 2010 > > > > From: Steven Friedrich > > > > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > > > Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 12:47:29 -0400 > > > > Subject: sudo anomaly > > > > > > > > I have a userID, admin, that I add to my systems to use when I > > > > perform system admin functions. I also use this ID when using > > > > X-windows, never starting X as root user. > > > > > > > > So I needed to check my mail for daily run outputs and so I tried to > > > > use su then mail, but I got admin's mail. So I exited su, and tried > > > > sudo mail. I got root's mailbox nd I deleted all but two emails. > > > > When I q(uit) mail, it said it saved 2 messages in mbox. But when I > > > > try to go back in it says I don't have any mail. There is no root > > > > directory in /var/mail. > > > > > > All that is correct. > > > > > > > Did sudo lose my mbox? > > > > > > Nope. _you_ did. > > > > > > > > > > > > The good news is that you merely misplaced it -- it _is_ were it's > > > always been, you're just looking in the wrong place for it.` > > > > > > 'mbox' != 'incoming mailbox' > > > > > > > Can anyone verify this anomaly? > > > > > > no anomaly. simple *USER* error. > > > > > > > > > > > > Look in root's _HOME_DIRECTORY_. You'll find a file called 'mbox' > > > =there=. > > > > > > That's where 'already read' mail is saved. > > > > > > When logged in as root, use 'mail -f mbox' to see your old mail. > > > > > > BTW, if you 'su root' and _then_ set evnrionment variable 'USER' to > > > 'root', mail(1) _will_ fetch root's mail. > > > > Thanks. I used mail under unix eons ago, and I don't remember ever having > > to use a switch to get saved mail, but perhaps I've simply forgotten. I > > use KMail and Thunderbird (under Winblows), but I needed to check daily > > output scripts... > > did you use 'su root' or 'su - root'? the '-' makes a humongous > difference. Thanks, I had forgotten about that... -- System Name: laptop2.StevenFriedrich.org Hardware: 2.80GHz Intel Pentium 4 (HTT) with 2 GB memory OS version: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE i386 (6.9 MB kernel) manager(s): kde4-4.5.1 X windows: xorg-7.5 X.Org X Server 1.7.5 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 17:05:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF1CB1065674 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:05:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@insightbb.com) Received: from mxsf00.insightbb.com (mxsf00.insightbb.com [74.128.0.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99F5F8FC08 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:05:18 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,243,1283745600"; d="scan'208";a="916903004" Received: from unknown (HELO asav01.insightbb.com) ([172.31.249.123]) by mxsf00.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 27 Sep 2010 13:05:17 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlNEAF9roExKgCiCO2dsb2JhbACHbYwnjX8MAQEBATUtyRSFRAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,243,1283745600"; d="scan'208";a="286043468" Received: from 74-128-40-130.dhcp.insightbb.com (HELO laptop2.stevenfriedrich.org) ([74.128.40.130]) by asavout01.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 27 Sep 2010 13:05:17 -0400 From: Steven Friedrich To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 13:05:13 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.1-RELEASE; KDE/4.5.1; i386; ; ) References: <201009111442.49114.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> <201009261252.14140.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> <201009271135.19590.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <201009271135.19590.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201009271305.13740.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> Subject: Re: apropos returning same item twice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:05:18 -0000 On Monday 27 September 2010 6:35:19 am Mike Clarke wrote: > On Sunday 26 September 2010, Steven Friedrich wrote: > > > > > Another check is that the output of manpath(1) doesn't > > > > > include /usr/X11R6/man. > > > > > > > > manpath > > > > /usr/share/man:/usr/local/man:/usr/local/kde4/man:/usr/share/open > > > > > > > >ssl/man: > > > > /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.12.2/man:/usr/local/lib/perl5/5.12.2/perl/ > > > > > > > >man > > > > > > Ok. There's also: > > > %man -a -w mysql > > > > > > to see the origins of the multiple man pages, although it seems > > > that you may have already confirmed the /usr/X11R6 path connection. > > > > > > >From what you've presented so far I'd say it's looking like a > > > > > > > > problem > > > > man -a -w mysql > > /usr/local/man/man1/mysql.1.gz > > /usr/X11R6/man/man1/mysql.1.gz > > Same here - until I realised that I still had /usr/X11R6/bin in $PATH, > left over from the days before /usr/X11R6 was a link to /usr/local. > Removing /usr/X11R6/bin from $PATH fixed it for me. According to the > man page for manpath it "tries to determine the user's manpath from a > set of system defaults and the user's PATH". Thanks, dude. That was my problem. -- System Name: laptop2.StevenFriedrich.org Hardware: 2.80GHz Intel Pentium 4 (HTT) with 2 GB memory OS version: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE i386 (6.9 MB kernel) manager(s): kde4-4.5.1 X windows: xorg-7.5 X.Org X Server 1.7.5 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 18:55:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2FD5106564A for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 18:55:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr16.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr16.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67BDE8FC14 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 18:55:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.erewhon.net (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr16.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o8RIthk4037664; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 20:55:43 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.erewhon.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6DBA5BA95; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 20:55:43 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 20:55:43 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: David Allen Message-ID: <20100927185543.GA79932@slackbox.erewhon.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multiple Machines X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 18:55:45 -0000 --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 03:04:45PM -0800, David Allen wrote: > Multiple Machines >=20 > This is sort of a "best practices" kind of question so all comments are > welcome. I'm wondering what folks are doing when setting up multiple > (more than 1, but less than 10) machines. >=20 > Consider, for example, some ordinary files such as the following: >=20 > /root/.cshrc > /root/.bashrc # toor account > /root/.bash_profile # toor account > /home/username/.bashrc > /home/username/.bash_profile > /etc/make.conf > /etc/src.conf > /etc/fstab # nfs mount entries > /etc/resolv.conf > /etc/ntp.conf >=20 > Some files are identical, some require different permissions, and some > (like fstab) consist of customizations that need to be added. >=20 > Short of enabling root ssh logins or writing makefiles, what would be the > best approach to handing the above? Every configuration file that I want to change, I copy first to ~/setup//, each of which is a git repository. (Of course you can = use any revision control system you like.) For managing files, I use "list" files combined with a couple of perl-scripts, called check.pl and install.pl. The list file details where e= ach file is to be copied to and what permissions it should have. The check scri= pts checks for differences between the files in the repository and the installed files. The install.pl does the obvious. :-) You can find this elaborated on one of my webpages: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/unix/configfiles.html=20 I tend to use rsync to copy these setup directories from my workstation to other machines (which also backs them up!). Then I log in by ssh to run the check and install scripts. It should be possible to extend the check and install scripts to work over = ssh directly. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkyg6K8ACgkQEnfvsMMhpyXsNgCeP2QTXZE/duSLPWaic5227PeE seAAn36uyUwao+rAu8u8IaFJ6Nf1kEY8 =5rzl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cNdxnHkX5QqsyA0e-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 19:07:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA477106566B for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:07:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jrisom@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 809258FC12 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:07:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxn35 with SMTP id 35so2020945yxn.13 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:07:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gfxq5qQDFPpdL+pdk3RW6cqhyPXik0orRdoBN2rlu2M=; b=wDWoc67cHgXZwczPatCa56Z3rR4398JwC8KqUf/7TOc+D9l4zUeGgbfS8aRJtvlwlW L0MWBCgEPdZwLihGR0s9FSa6D6xE8GLi8msiyZmud4GXDa2o6iQ7MkbftdVZYGTbxiKS HEZDgGFAvpAGTgtBn0lhAX6m69dto6lc6iZ5s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=SLr82OAtXdDQYDWTkBk1PfHm2+daZkbPGUOYONMV5w/IWjEtEjcFMYrMwZmuK9HBZy +JL8jM+ZT+Bk5N1EyLEiSPX0sFaBWMSaML89oL3Y+O7csHid8oMEHEd7BDe13Gm+63f3 FF4g/+4MitCpMVIAZR2L8RpCmLQXfVoflT0Qg= Received: by 10.100.210.6 with SMTP id i6mr6306915ang.143.1285614468606; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:07:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (c-24-14-170-47.hsd1.il.comcast.net [24.14.170.47]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t24sm6758468ano.12.2010.09.27.12.07.47 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:07:47 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CA0EB84.3040802@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 14:07:48 -0500 From: Joshua Isom User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Prevent symbolic links in pure-ftp! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:07:49 -0000 On 9/27/2010 12:00 PM, Phan Quoc Hien wrote: > hi! > > How to prevent symbolic links in pure-ftp for security issuse? > > User can access outsite chroot by create symlink: ln -s / abc => and user >> can change dir to / >> > > Anyone can solve this problem? > Thanks. > man 8 jail Jails limit file system access, device access, and kernel access. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 19:10:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F467106566B for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:10:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dick@nagual.nl) Received: from mail.nagual.nl (524948AF.cm-4-2b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [82.73.72.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B20A8FC0C for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:10:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.11.34] (192.168.11.34) by westmark.nagual.nl (Axigen) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) ESMTPSA id 08DCCC; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:00:12 +0200 Message-ID: <4CA0EC31.5090108@nagual.nl> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:10:41 +0200 From: Dick Hoogendijk User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; nl; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4CA0EB84.3040802@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4CA0EB84.3040802@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AxigenSpam-Level: 4 X-AxigenVirus-Level: 1 Subject: Re: Prevent symbolic links in pure-ftp! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:10:37 -0000 On 27-9-2010 21:07, Joshua Isom wrote: > On 9/27/2010 12:00 PM, Phan Quoc Hien wrote: >> hi! >> >> How to prevent symbolic links in pure-ftp for security issuse? >> >> User can access outsite chroot by create symlink: ln -s / abc => and >> user >>> can change dir to / >>> >> >> Anyone can solve this problem? Have you read the manual for pure-ftpd? Symbolic link following can be turned off completely if you so wish, but I do not want to do your homework. Sorry. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 19:16:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18E78106566C for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:16:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C59888FC14 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:16:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P0JC1-00074N-Ff for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:16:53 +0200 Received: from pool-173-79-85-36.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([173.79.85.36]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:16:53 +0200 Received: from nightrecon by pool-173-79-85-36.washdc.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:16:53 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Followup-To: gmane.os.freebsd.questions Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 15:19:24 -0400 Lines: 24 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-173-79-85-36.washdc.fios.verizon.net Subject: Re: [SOLVED] Trouble enabling GD in php/apache X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 19:16:58 -0000 Andy Wodfer wrote: > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 1:52 PM, Andy Wodfer wrote: > >> I'm running FreeBSD 8.0 RELEASE. >> >> I can't get GD enabled. I have installed latestes php5 from ports aswell >> as php5-extensions and enabled GD on the option screen: [snip] > > I solved my problem by manually deleting /usr/local/lib/php/20090626/gd.so > and reinstalling the php5-extensions. For me it was reordering the loading order in php.ini. Initially I had tried placing it at the bottom, as well as moving xcache.so to the end. When I moved pdf.so to _after_ gd it magically began working: extension=gd.so extension=pdf.so extension=xcache.so -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 27 21:31:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B73401065670 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:31:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@lecuire.fr) Received: from neutron.lecuire.fr (lecuire.fr [82.232.211.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DF058FC19 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:31:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [192.168.0.50]) by neutron.lecuire.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A98FF61C34 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 23:31:23 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4CA10D2D.7030605@lecuire.fr> Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 23:31:25 +0200 From: BernardL User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; fr; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4C8316C5.2060906@gmail.com> <4CA00A1F.5010405@rdtan.net> In-Reply-To: <4CA00A1F.5010405@rdtan.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 100927-1, 27/09/2010), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:41:54 +0000 Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Compaq mini CQ10 anyone? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 21:31:25 -0000 Le 27/09/2010 05:06, Edward a écrit : >> I just got one and was wondering if anyone was running FreeBSD on it >> and how well does it work out of the box. >> All comments are welcome. > Try PCBSD (http://pcbsd.org), is a Desktop BSD variant based on FreeBSD. > Personally, I've used FreeBSD in a laptop in a few occasions but after > trying out PCBSD, this path requires the least effort to setup a > Desktop. The installation& setting up of hardware is too easy. The > kernel that comes with it, does a good job in recognizing the wireless > chip, sound card, NIC, display& other stuff. Even though it uses the > PBI format to install software on PCBSD, one can still use port to > install additional softwares on it by using the "portjail" console. Both > PBI& port works together well. > > In short, it definitely worth a try! :) I have tried to install PC-BSD without success. In the process, the screen turned black and i had to turn the CQ10 off. I don't know whether there is an issue with PC-BSD or if I did something wrong. Bernard Lecuire From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 00:49:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C41F106566B for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 00:49:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from myself@rdtan.net) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBFD38FC12 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 00:49:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qy0-f175.google.com with SMTP id 30so1634365qyk.13 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:49:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.86.69 with SMTP id r5mr6298847qcl.97.1285634981447; Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:49:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xhost.local ([115.133.231.135]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v3sm1198130vcr.15.2010.09.27.17.49.38 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 27 Sep 2010 17:49:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CA13BA0.3040902@rdtan.net> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 08:49:36 +0800 From: Edward User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.4; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: BernardL References: <4C8316C5.2060906@gmail.com> <4CA00A1F.5010405@rdtan.net> <4CA10D2D.7030605@lecuire.fr> In-Reply-To: <4CA10D2D.7030605@lecuire.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Compaq mini CQ10 anyone? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 00:49:42 -0000 On 28/09/10 5:31, BernardL wrote: > I have tried to install PC-BSD without success. In the process, the > screen turned black and i had to turn the CQ10 off. I don't know > whether there is an issue with PC-BSD or if I did something wrong. There's an option for "display wizard" to change display settings but I've never had a chance to use it because the machines I use (2 laptop with intel chipset & 1 desktop with nvidia chipset) have no problem detecting the display settings. :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 05:22:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40E9C106564A for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 05:22:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vermaden@interia.pl) Received: from smtpo.poczta.interia.pl (smtpo.poczta.interia.pl [217.74.65.205]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 057698FC15 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 05:22:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtpo.poczta.interia.pl (INTERIA.PL, from userid 502) id 273BF1A42769; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 07:07:47 +0200 (CEST) Date: 28 Sep 2010 07:07:46 +0200 From: vermaden Sender: vermaden@interia.pl To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; CHARSET=UTF-8 X-ORIGINATE-IP: 194.0.181.62 X-PRIORITY: 3 X-Mailer: PSE3 Message-Id: <20100928050746.5342D3D1A47@fwb.poczta.interia.pl> X-Interia-Antivirus: OK X-EMID: 10c40acc Subject: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 05:22:52 -0000 Hi all, how about 'porting' the Open{Solaris,Indiana} feature called _Time Slider_ in Nautilus to the FreeBSD's Nautilus? I know that there aren't any patches attached to my mail, but it may be not that much work to have another great feature in FreeBSD. Regards, vermaden ---- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Gra dla duzych chlopcow. http://linkint.pl/f2717 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 06:01:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03A611065674 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 06:01:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA0938FC0C for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 06:01:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-226-229.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.226.229]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C2C21E7DA; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 08:01:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id o8S61nIK004065; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 08:01:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 08:01:48 +0200 From: Polytropon To: vermaden Message-Id: <20100928080148.fccd2e10.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20100928050746.5342D3D1A47@fwb.poczta.interia.pl> References: <20100928050746.5342D3D1A47@fwb.poczta.interia.pl> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 06:01:52 -0000 On 28 Sep 2010 07:07:46 +0200, vermaden wrote: > Hi all, > > how about 'porting' the Open{Solaris,Indiana} > feature called _Time Slider_ in Nautilus to > the FreeBSD's Nautilus? I think you should address this request to the Gnome project, as Nautilus is a part of Gnome, not of FreeBSD (the operating system) per se. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 07:10:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45AEC106564A for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 07:10:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 087CD8FC12 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 07:10:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id o8S7Aq8x036272 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 28 Sep 2010 00:10:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id o8S7AqJA036271; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 00:10:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA24650; Tue, 28 Sep 10 00:02:31 PDT Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 00:02:29 -0700 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk Message-Id: <4ca19305.qVDnt7/ifQhIrQ0c%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <20100926123019.GA41450@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <4C9F3BBA.2060809@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4ca03df2.lQjjNnRah4BJhw4Y%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <201009271016.26902.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <201009271016.26902.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Free BSD 8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 07:10:55 -0000 Mike Clarke wrote: > On Monday 27 September 2010, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > > I've recently started on a new system, and am planning to > > install 8.1-RELEASE, including the corresponding ports tree; > > then install what ports I can from packages and also fetch the > > corresponding distfiles; and finally build -- from release- > > corresponding ports -- any that aren't available as packages or > > where I want non-default OPTION settings. That approach should > > avoid most nasty surprises while getting things set up and > > working. _After_ everything is installed and configured > > properly will be plenty soon enough to consider whether any > > ports need to be updated -- and the already-installed-and- > > working package collection will provide a fallback in case > > of trouble trying to build any updated versions. > > The problem is if/when you need to update a port as a result of > a security advisory. If your ports tree is very much out of date > then it's likely that updating that one port will require a number > of dependencies to be updated as well, sometimes all the ports > depending on one or more of the updated dependencies need to be > updated as well and the resultant bag of worms can take quite a > lot of sorting out. The "little and often" approach of keeping > the ports tree up to date could be less traumatic. and, in this context, your point is? I'm advocating starting from a stable and self-consistent baseline, consisting of a release _and_ its corresponding port/package collection, and then considering whether any updates are needed. Isn't that orthogonal to the question of whether or not to follow ports updates, once the baseline has been established? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 07:24:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC950106564A for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 07:24:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ryan.coleman@cwis.biz) Received: from qmta01.westchester.pa.hmc1.comcast.net (qmta01.westchester.pa.hmc1.comcast.net [76.96.53.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CA6E8FC16 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 07:24:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta01.westchester.pa.hmc1.comcast.net ([76.96.53.6]) by qmta01.westchester.pa.hmc1.comcast.net with comcast id C7Hr1f00G082Dic017QTB6; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 07:24:27 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.7] ([70.89.202.1]) by omta01.westchester.pa.hmc1.comcast.net with bizsmtp id C7QS1f00102K3z2017QThi; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 07:24:27 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Ryan Coleman In-Reply-To: <4ca19305.qVDnt7/ifQhIrQ0c%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 02:24:26 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <5711C7AE-92FD-4ECA-B0DC-2CF91A10B809@cwis.biz> References: <20100926123019.GA41450@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <4C9F3BBA.2060809@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4ca03df2.lQjjNnRah4BJhw4Y%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <201009271016.26902.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> <4ca19305.qVDnt7/ifQhIrQ0c%perryh@pluto.rain.com> To: perryh@pluto.rain.com X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Cc: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Free BSD 8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 07:24:28 -0000 On Sep 28, 2010, at 2:02 AM, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > Mike Clarke wrote: >> On Monday 27 September 2010, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: >>> I've recently started on a new system, and am planning to >>> install 8.1-RELEASE, including the corresponding ports tree; >>> then install what ports I can from packages and also fetch the >>> corresponding distfiles; and finally build -- from release- >>> corresponding ports -- any that aren't available as packages or >>> where I want non-default OPTION settings. That approach should >>> avoid most nasty surprises while getting things set up and >>> working. _After_ everything is installed and configured >>> properly will be plenty soon enough to consider whether any >>> ports need to be updated -- and the already-installed-and- >>> working package collection will provide a fallback in case >>> of trouble trying to build any updated versions. >>=20 >> The problem is if/when you need to update a port as a result of >> a security advisory. If your ports tree is very much out of date >> then it's likely that updating that one port will require a number >> of dependencies to be updated as well, sometimes all the ports >> depending on one or more of the updated dependencies need to be >> updated as well and the resultant bag of worms can take quite a >> lot of sorting out. The "little and often" approach of keeping >> the ports tree up to date could be less traumatic. >=20 > and, in this context, your point is? >=20 > I'm advocating starting from a stable and self-consistent baseline, > consisting of a release _and_ its corresponding port/package > collection, and then considering whether any updates are needed. > Isn't that orthogonal to the question of whether or not to follow > ports updates, once the baseline has been established? As I understand it: The OS itself is stable, but the ports are = constantly in flux and may be issues. Please correct me if I am wrong. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 07:38:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2643106564A for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 07:38:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80F5D8FC14 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 07:38:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-226-229.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.226.229]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id E29C73D310; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 09:38:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id o8S7c4kG006381; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 09:38:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 09:38:04 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Ryan Coleman Message-Id: <20100928093804.f61d6d58.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <5711C7AE-92FD-4ECA-B0DC-2CF91A10B809@cwis.biz> References: <20100926123019.GA41450@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <4C9F3BBA.2060809@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4ca03df2.lQjjNnRah4BJhw4Y%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <201009271016.26902.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> <4ca19305.qVDnt7/ifQhIrQ0c%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <5711C7AE-92FD-4ECA-B0DC-2CF91A10B809@cwis.biz> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Free BSD 8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 07:38:07 -0000 On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 02:24:26 -0500, Ryan Coleman wrote: > As I understand it: The OS itself is stable, but the ports are > constantly in flux and may be issues. Not exactly. It depends on which update road you follow. Say, you use freebsd-update (the binary update), or use c(v)sup to track -RELEASE (including the security patches), your OS is stable. Certain points in time can be addressed by a specific patch level, e. g. -RELEASE-p1 for the first one, -RELEASE-p2 for the second one, and so on. If you track -STABLE by using c(v)sup (doesn't work with the binary freebsd-update!), your OS is also stable. There is no further "versioning" as with the patch levels; the date decides. As you can't binary upgrade here, compiling yourself is needed. But if you track -CURRENT (means -HEAD), it *might* be that the OS won't even compile, or runs unstable. This is due to the fact that *this* branch does sometimes include experimental changes or features that are tested, and maybe removed later on. It's obvious that you need to retrieve the sources and compile your- self in this case, too. Ports, on the other hand, are not related to the OS version. If you use -RELEASE for example, you can, if it fits your needs, stay with the default ports tree that has been "issued" the same time the release came out. This is the state you'll find on the installation media. You can also use the precompiled packages. If you decide to upgrade your ports tree because you need newer versions or specific features, it *may* be possible that a certain point in time of -RELEASE is not sufficient, and this might force you to change your road to follow -STABLE. This can either be the case by installing from an updated ports tree or from Latest/ packages (instead of RELEASE one's). Summary: -RELEASE and -STABLE are stable, -CURRENT or -HEAD do not neccessarily have to be. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 08:20:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71089106564A for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 08:20:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from plcmaechler@vtxmail.ch) Received: from smtp-01.datacomm.ch (smtp-01.datacomm.ch [212.40.2.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3511B8FC0A for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 08:20:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.50] (security.glattnet.ch [80.242.192.42]) (Authenticated sender: plcmaechler@vtxmail.ch) by smtp-01.datacomm.ch (VTX Datacomm AG) with ESMTPA id B3F281DC110 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:02:24 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4CA1A109.60906@vtxmail.ch> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:02:17 +0200 From: Maechler Philippe User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100825 Thunderbird/3.1.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: FreeBSD 8.x and RAID Controllers from Areca and HP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 08:20:13 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello all, I hope someone can help me installing FreeBSD 8.x with a RAID Controller from HP or Areca. We have a HP Proliant DL320 G6 Server with a built in HP Smart Array Controller. Since we haven't any luck in using the raid controllers from hp we bought an Areca ARC1210 Raid Card. When we boot up from the cd the installer hangs with: run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 60 seconds for xpt_config run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 120 seconds for xpt_config run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 180 seconds for xpt_config run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 240 seconds for xpt_config run_interrupt_driven_hooks: still waiting after 300 seconds for xpt_config and then the machine freezes. This happens on FreeBSD 7.3 - 8.1 (AMD64 and i386). On FreeBSD 7.2 i386 there is no problem with the areca controller. Google told me to disable the firewire and usb ports in the bios, we did that without any improvments. Some additional information from the machine: HP Proliant DL320 G6; XEON E5505 1.87Ghz and 4GB RAM HP Smart Array B110i V1.38 Areca ARC1210 Driver Verson 1.20.00.16 2009-10-10 Areca ARC1210 Firmware Verson 1.48 2009-12-31 (we tried V1.46 before) Kind regards Philippe -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkyhoQAACgkQ22zB6cg51rORuACfS824v+t7tSZX28pd7FvIR4Op ptwAn2Gsvnm7ONLW9ABI944jXueGYkxD =IjvV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 08:26:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 909E41065701 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 08:26:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@saturn.pcs.ms) Received: from mail1.hostpark.net (mail1.hostpark.net [212.243.197.31]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18F6C8FC1C for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 08:26:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail1.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C564F907C4; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:08:00 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by Hostpark/NetZone Mailprotection at hostpark.net Received: from mail1.hostpark.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail1.hostpark.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10124) with ESMTP id FY3VwkdE+XGw; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:08:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from saturn.pcs.ms (75-182.203-62.cust.bluewin.ch [62.203.182.75]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail1.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F6A7906C2; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:08:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from saturn.pcs.ms (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saturn.pcs.ms (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o8S87je9080056 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:07:45 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from martin@saturn.pcs.ms) Received: (from martin@localhost) by saturn.pcs.ms (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o8S87jiI080055; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:07:45 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from martin) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:07:44 +0200 From: Martin Schweizer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100928080744.GA80050@saturn.pcs.ms> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Organization: PC-Service M. Schweizer GmbH, CH-8608 Bubikon, Switzerland User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Problem with SASL authentication against Kerberos5 (Windows Active Directory) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Martin Schweizer List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 08:26:07 -0000 Hello My system: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE #2: Tue Aug 31 17:07:54 CEST 2010 :/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 Relevant part of the installed software: # pkg_info|grep cyrus cyrus-imapd-2.3.16_2 The cyrus mail server, supporting POP3 and IMAP4 protocols cyrus-sasl-2.1.23 RFC 2222 SASL (Simple Authentication and Security Layer) cyrus-sasl-saslauthd-2.1.23 SASL authentication server for cyrus-sasl2 Kerberos5 settings: They are all ok, because I can these cross check by using kinit (and such tools), ldapsearch and of course the security event protocol of the domain controllers. So I can say all this is ok. /etc/rc.conf: [snip] saslauthd_enable="YES" saslauthd_flags="-a kerberos5" I use three of the above servers and with two of them I have no such problems. Here what is going wrong: After I update all my ports I can no longer authenticate against Kerberos5. The test with testsaslauthd -u usernamex -p passwordx ends always in 0: NO "authentication failed". In /var/log/auth.log I can see Sep 24 08:07:28 saslauthd[83827]: do_auth : auth failure: [user=martin] [service=imap] [realm=] [mech=kerberos5] [reason=krb5_verify_user_opt failed]. What's intressting if I use saslauthd_flags="-a pam" then all is working as expected. And again before the update all worked without any problems. Any ideas? Regards, -- Martin Schweizer PC-Service M. Schweizer GmbH; Bannholzstrasse 6; CH-8608 Bubikon Tel. +41 55 243 30 00; Fax: +41 55 243 33 22 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 08:27:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B32BF106566C for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 08:27:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stark@mapper.nl) Received: from smtp-out2.tiscali.nl (smtp-out2.tiscali.nl [195.241.79.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A11D8FC2E for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 08:27:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.170.17.27] (helo=mapper.nl) by smtp-out2.tiscali.nl with esmtp (Exim) (envelope-from ) id 1P0VHw-0003Kn-Tc for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:11:49 +0200 Received: from yoshi ([10.58.235.3] helo=[0.0.0.0]) by mapper.nl with esmtp (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1P0VHt-0000xR-RF for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:11:45 +0200 Message-ID: <4CA1A33B.9050600@mapper.nl> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:11:39 +0200 From: Mark Stapper User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , "freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org" X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig57F1B26E2F4081163A53E83B" Subject: MEncoder - nice allways 20, renice doesn't work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 08:27:51 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig57F1B26E2F4081163A53E83B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, I've been playing around with incoding/recoding with mencoder. On one of my boxes mencoder keeps having niceness 20. I don't want mencoder to play nice so I try to renice the process, but it resets to 20 within seconds! Here's the info: [stark@yoshi ~]$ mencoder -show-profile x264ac3 MEncoder SVN-r31746-snapshot-4.2.1 (C) 2000-2010 MPlayer Team Profile x264ac3: x264 with ac3 audio ovc=3Dx264=3D1 x264encopts=3Dcrf=3D20:threads=3Dauto oac=3Dlavc=3D1 lavcopts=3Dacodec=3Dac3:abitrate=3D640:threads=3D6 FreeBSD mario 8.1-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-PRERELEASE #5: Mon Jun 21 19:34:39 CEST 2010 xxxxxxxx@mario:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/mario amd64 Any thoughts? Cheers, Mark --------------enig57F1B26E2F4081163A53E83B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkyhoz4ACgkQN9xNqOOVnWAsCwCggC1o0lHnRYiRGuEFG9dP75QS qH8AnR3vmnn9MriVyyGgaT8yS+JR867U =JHJ+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig57F1B26E2F4081163A53E83B-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 10:35:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 690281065670 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:35:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C978FC0C for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:35:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P0XWe-0000wR-IQ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:35:08 +0200 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:35:08 +0200 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:35:08 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:35:09 +0200 Lines: 15 Message-ID: References: <4CA1A109.60906@vtxmail.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100518 Thunderbird/3.0.4 In-Reply-To: <4CA1A109.60906@vtxmail.ch> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Subject: Re: FreeBSD 8.x and RAID Controllers from Areca and HP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:35:10 -0000 On 09/28/10 10:02, Maechler Philippe wrote: > Hello all, > > I hope someone can help me installing FreeBSD 8.x with a RAID Controller > from HP or Areca. > and then the machine freezes. This happens on FreeBSD 7.3 - 8.1 (AMD64 > and i386). > On FreeBSD 7.2 i386 there is no problem with the areca controller. > > Google told me to disable the firewire and usb ports in the bios, we did > that without any improvments. Try asking on hardware@ freebsd.org or stable@ freebsd.org if you don't get any replies here. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 11:14:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02E59106566B for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:14:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B41C78FC12 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:14:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsc.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.41]) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P0Y9A-00062s-Ak for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:14:56 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncsc.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1P0Y9A-0001TK-7U for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:14:56 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o8SBEtjY026057 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:14:55 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o8SBEtnj026056 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:14:55 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:14:55 +0100 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100928111455.GA58901@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: ld(1) cannot find entry symbol _start; X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:14:58 -0000 I'm trying to learn the very basics of the compile - assemble - link process on FreeBSD. Please don't shoot me. I've this c code: % cat tmp.c int main() { int a; int b; int c; a = 2; b = 3; c=a*b; } which I compile into assembly language: % gcc -v Using built-in specs. Target: ia64-undermydesk-freebsd Configured with: FreeBSD/ia64 system compiler Thread model: posix gcc version 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD] % gcc -S tmp.c I then assemble the object file: % gcc -o tmp.o -c tmp.s % file tmp.o tmp.o: ELF 64-bit LSB relocatable, IA-64, version 1 (FreeBSD), not stripped Then I try to link the object file into an executable: % ld tmp.o ld: warning: cannot find entry symbol _start; defaulting to 20000000000000f0 Finally, when I try to run the executable, I get segfault: % ./a.out Segmentation fault (core dumped) Looking at the asm listing, there is indeed no _start symbol: .file "tmp.c" .pred.safe_across_calls p1-p5,p16-p63 .text .align 16 .global main# .proc main# main: .prologue 2, 2 .vframe r2 mov r2 = r12 .body ;; adds r15 = 8, r2 addl r14 = 2, r0 ;; st4 [r15] = r14 adds r15 = 4, r2 addl r14 = 3, r0 ;; st4 [r15] = r14 adds r14 = 8, r2 adds r15 = 4, r2 ;; ld4 r16 = [r14] ld4 r14 = [r15] ;; setf.sig f6 = r16 setf.sig f7 = r14 ;; xmpy.l f6 = f6, f7 ;; getf.sig r14 = f6 ;; st4 [r2] = r14 .restore sp mov r12 = r2 br.ret.sptk.many b0 ;; .endp main# .ident "GCC: (GNU) 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD]" What am I missing? I'm happy to be referred to FM. many thanks anton -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 11:25:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86FEB10656A4 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:25:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from onemda@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DA168FC12 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:25:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwb15 with SMTP id 15so2319553gwb.13 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 04:25:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=jHgQrOKo9YUE0djZykFwsZlrT23AmqUNfTIFMhjrdu4=; b=M7DMaSfGuMX+szgcy5j7rFYuVxQwFuBCtmxsnrdM53qfqGbDTqYzia52NhOuLc+DAp 4BcVwwTVMk+2kwtcV3xJNfjggcEkhcwoNM34lefzxmeCfm9AT8B6Xt1eb3hSMFgm5z7H 6JcPRXTdnkWYXwx+0ASECMcdTeQM36kog3hkw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ij4rhaepIq2qvoCr3InCSTwERIsjRT6xBrU6nOG866Rzsg4dq721UYLE8FHKbYFQ8A hHSG+YhkucdYYaY0qy3Ca+nbLsUI8lvI67NvWPyHmjjutUO4s5kQP5WsfkuUjWMwCmfd wdhJtN6uF6DO1J7Ly/ju5/p+teYGqEkK2kZrY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.135.20 with SMTP id i20mr10554335ybd.62.1285673154548; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 04:25:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.200.1 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 04:25:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100928111455.GA58901@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20100928111455.GA58901@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:25:54 +0000 Message-ID: From: Paul B Mahol To: Anton Shterenlikht Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ld(1) cannot find entry symbol _start; X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:25:56 -0000 On 9/28/10, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > I'm trying to learn the very basics of the > compile - assemble - link process on FreeBSD. > Please don't shoot me. > > I've this c code: > > % cat tmp.c > int main() { > int a; > int b; > int c; > > a = 2; > b = 3; > > c=a*b; > } > > which I compile into assembly language: > > % gcc -v > Using built-in specs. > Target: ia64-undermydesk-freebsd > Configured with: FreeBSD/ia64 system compiler > Thread model: posix > gcc version 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD] > > % gcc -S tmp.c > > I then assemble the object file: > > % gcc -o tmp.o -c tmp.s > % file tmp.o > tmp.o: ELF 64-bit LSB relocatable, IA-64, version 1 (FreeBSD), not stripped > > Then I try to link the object file into > an executable: > > % ld tmp.o You are missing something in above command. > ld: warning: cannot find entry symbol _start; defaulting to 20000000000000f0 > > Finally, when I try to run the executable, > I get segfault: > > % ./a.out > Segmentation fault (core dumped) > > > Looking at the asm listing, there is indeed no > _start symbol: > > > .file "tmp.c" > .pred.safe_across_calls p1-p5,p16-p63 > .text > .align 16 > .global main# > .proc main# > main: > .prologue 2, 2 > .vframe r2 > mov r2 = r12 > .body > ;; > adds r15 = 8, r2 > addl r14 = 2, r0 > ;; > st4 [r15] = r14 > adds r15 = 4, r2 > addl r14 = 3, r0 > ;; > st4 [r15] = r14 > adds r14 = 8, r2 > adds r15 = 4, r2 > ;; > ld4 r16 = [r14] > ld4 r14 = [r15] > ;; > setf.sig f6 = r16 > setf.sig f7 = r14 > ;; > xmpy.l f6 = f6, f7 > ;; > getf.sig r14 = f6 > ;; > st4 [r2] = r14 > .restore sp > mov r12 = r2 > br.ret.sptk.many b0 > ;; > .endp main# > .ident "GCC: (GNU) 4.2.1 20070719 [FreeBSD]" > > > What am I missing? > > I'm happy to be referred to FM. > > many thanks > anton > > -- > Anton Shterenlikht > Room 2.6, Queen's Building > Mech Eng Dept > Bristol University > University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK > Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 > Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 11:38:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD03F106566C for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:38:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr) Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 588088FC0C for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:38:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr [134.157.10.1]) by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.14.4/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id o8SBc9ku099754 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 13:38:10 +0200 (CEST) X-Ids: 166 Received: from niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr [134.157.10.41]) by parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E991B89BED for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 13:38:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (Postfix, from userid 2005) id CA83140BC; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 13:39:34 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 13:39:34 +0000 From: Michel Talon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100928133934.GA14595@lpthe.jussieu.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Miltered: at jchkmail.jussieu.fr with ID 4CA1D3A2.001 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)! X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 4CA1D3A2.001/134.157.10.1/parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr/parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr/ Subject: Re: Free BSD 8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:38:12 -0000 Polytropon said: > If you decide to upgrade your ports tree because you need newer > versions or specific features, it *may* be possible that a certain > point in time of -RELEASE is not sufficient, and this might force > you to change your road to follow -STABLE. This can either be the > case by installing from an updated ports tree or from Latest/ > packages (instead of RELEASE one's). An other option is to download a specific port from (*) http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/ and compiling it independently of the ports tree. In many cases it works perfectly OK and avoids to upgrade the ports tree itself and the destabilization which ensues. Of course you can also upgrade frequently the ports tree and run frequently portupgrade or portmaster, if you like tinkering with your machine. (*) in any given port you will find "Download this directory in tarball" -- Michel TALON From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 11:52:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E452B106566B for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:52:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr) Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 784AB8FC1B for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:52:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr [134.157.10.1]) by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.14.4/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id o8SBqnMB003360 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 13:52:50 +0200 (CEST) X-Ids: 166 Received: from niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr [134.157.10.41]) by parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EF438A258 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 13:52:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: by niobe.lpthe.jussieu.fr (Postfix, from userid 2005) id 76ED240BC; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 13:54:14 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 13:54:14 +0000 From: Michel Talon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100928135414.GA17159@lpthe.jussieu.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Miltered: at jchkmail.jussieu.fr with ID 4CA1D711.006 by Joe's j-chkmail (http : // j-chkmail dot ensmp dot fr)! X-j-chkmail-Enveloppe: 4CA1D711.006/134.157.10.1/parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr/parthe.lpthe.jussieu.fr/ Subject: Re: ld(1) cannot find entry symbol _start; X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:52:52 -0000 Paul B Mahol said: On 9/28/10, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > I'm trying to learn the very basics of the > > compile - assemble - link process on FreeBSD. > > Please don't shoot me. > .... > > Then I try to link the object file into > > an executable: > > > > % ld tmp.o > > You are missing something in above command. > More precisely, if you run gcc -v on a C file you get someting like: /usr/bin/ld --eh-frame-hdr -V -dynamic-linker /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 /usr/lib/crt1.o /usr/lib/crti.o /usr/lib/crtbegin.o -L/usr/lib -L/usr/lib /var/tmp//cco5EINk.o -lgcc --as-needed -lgcc_s --no-as-needed -lc -lgcc --as-needed -lgcc_s --no-as-needed /usr/lib/crtend.o /usr/lib/crtn.o where the object file produced by compilation and assembling is /var/tmp//cco5EINk.o That is adds several other object files to your own in order to get an executable. In particular the start symbol, at which execution begins is in /usr/lib/crt1.o as you can see from niobe% nm /usr/lib/crt1.o w _DYNAMIC 00000000 D __progname U _fini U _init U _init_tls 00000000 T _start 00000020 t _start1 00000000 r abitag U atexit 00000004 C environ U exit U main which shows that _start is defined here, (but not e.g. _init). On the other hand the function main() which is defined in your program is referred to but undefined here. -- Michel TALON From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 13:53:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73CF81065670 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 13:53:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cwhiteh@onetel.com) Received: from woodbine.london.02.net (woodbine.london.02.net [87.194.255.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 083478FC14 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 13:53:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eco.config (93.97.24.219) by woodbine.london.02.net (8.5.124.10) id 4C8D7834005861F7; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:53:22 +0100 Message-ID: <4CA1F352.1090504@onetel.com> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:53:22 +0100 From: Chris Whitehouse User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091212) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: perryh@pluto.rain.com References: <20100926123019.GA41450@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <4C9F3BBA.2060809@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4ca03df2.lQjjNnRah4BJhw4Y%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <201009271016.26902.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> <4ca19305.qVDnt7/ifQhIrQ0c%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <4ca19305.qVDnt7/ifQhIrQ0c%perryh@pluto.rain.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Free BSD 8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 13:53:30 -0000 perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > > I'm advocating starting from a stable and self-consistent baseline, > consisting of a release _and_ its corresponding port/package > collection, and then considering whether any updates are needed. You might be interested to follow Manolis' custom DVD which is based on exactly that principle: http://freebsd-custom.wikidot.com Chris > Isn't that orthogonal to the question of whether or not to follow > ports updates, once the baseline has been established? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 14:02:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC41106566C for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:02:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E248FC20 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:02:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o8SE2UD1099330; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 08:02:30 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id o8SE2UAd099327; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 08:02:30 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 08:02:30 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Ryan Coleman In-Reply-To: <5711C7AE-92FD-4ECA-B0DC-2CF91A10B809@cwis.biz> Message-ID: References: <20100926123019.GA41450@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <4C9F3BBA.2060809@infracaninophile.co.uk> <4ca03df2.lQjjNnRah4BJhw4Y%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <201009271016.26902.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> <4ca19305.qVDnt7/ifQhIrQ0c%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <5711C7AE-92FD-4ECA-B0DC-2CF91A10B809@cwis.biz> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 28 Sep 2010 08:02:30 -0600 (MDT) Cc: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk, perryh@pluto.rain.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Free BSD 8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:02:34 -0000 On Tue, 28 Sep 2010, Ryan Coleman wrote: > > As I understand it: The OS itself is stable, but the ports are constantly in flux and may be issues. During a FreeBSD release, the ports tree is "frozen" and port updates are delayed. So a FreeBSD release really does come with with a somewhat stale and stable set of ports... which is immediately followed by a flurry of port updates as the ports tree is unfrozen. Often these updates include major applications like xorg, with time-consuming upgrade procedures. The snapshot of ports on a -release grows increasingly stale. After a while, it's easier to update the ports tree before installing anything. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 14:43:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D549106566B for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:43:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E572B8FC0C for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:43:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o8SEh5bj042128; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:43:05 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:43:05 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: perryh@pluto.rain.com In-Reply-To: <20100928120025.2A6EC10656DC@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20100928225602.C62022@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20100928120025.2A6EC10656DC@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Free BSD 8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:43:09 -0000 In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 330, Issue 2, Message: 22 On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 00:02:29 -0700 perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > Mike Clarke wrote: > > On Monday 27 September 2010, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > > > I've recently started on a new system, and am planning to > > > install 8.1-RELEASE, including the corresponding ports tree; > > > then install what ports I can from packages and also fetch the > > > corresponding distfiles; and finally build -- from release- > > > corresponding ports -- any that aren't available as packages or > > > where I want non-default OPTION settings. That approach should > > > avoid most nasty surprises while getting things set up and > > > working. _After_ everything is installed and configured > > > properly will be plenty soon enough to consider whether any > > > ports need to be updated -- and the already-installed-and- > > > working package collection will provide a fallback in case > > > of trouble trying to build any updated versions. > > > > The problem is if/when you need to update a port as a result of > > a security advisory. If your ports tree is very much out of date > > then it's likely that updating that one port will require a number > > of dependencies to be updated as well, sometimes all the ports > > depending on one or more of the updated dependencies need to be > > updated as well and the resultant bag of worms can take quite a > > lot of sorting out. The "little and often" approach of keeping > > the ports tree up to date could be less traumatic. > > and, in this context, your point is? > > I'm advocating starting from a stable and self-consistent baseline, > consisting of a release _and_ its corresponding port/package > collection, and then considering whether any updates are needed. > Isn't that orthogonal to the question of whether or not to follow > ports updates, once the baseline has been established? Makes sense to me. There's been a ports freeze and extra attention to consistency of dependencies leading up to a -RELEASE, so there's a much better chance of all your ports working together from the outset, then you can update them at leisure while still getting on with some work! That there's also a self-consistent complete set of packages at that point seems lost on some folks having good enough bandwidth and fast enough systems to never need bothering with packages. I agree with Mike about the worms :) I have an 8.0-RELEASE system with many ports installed and quite a few configured to taste with a recently upgraded 8-STABLE world, working through a huge portversion update list, started by fetching over 900MB of packages so far including X and KDE by portupgrade -aFPP. It's going to take a while, and I'll be surprised if I don't skin a few knuckles on circular dependencies along the way. cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 14:23:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A4C3106566C for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:23:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from akashb503@yahoo.co.in) Received: from n14-vm0.bullet.mail.in.yahoo.com (n14-vm0.bullet.mail.in.yahoo.com [202.86.5.219]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 393D48FC18 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:23:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [202.86.4.171] by n14.bullet.mail.in.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Sep 2010 14:10:38 -0000 Received: from [203.104.18.53] by t2.bullet.in.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Sep 2010 14:10:38 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp105.mail.in2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 28 Sep 2010 14:10:38 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 717287.82019.bm@omp105.mail.in2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 53166 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Sep 2010 14:10:38 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.co.in; s=s1024; t=1285683038; bh=osg5e/qCk0Yrd3AMswjXGc2FBn19Lc/dfdkj7jny1Dc=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ZunQKuUab1u9fsV13aiHZ/ju02kGZU9OW0pwdtk9e788F+6DbqZKLoRrOg/g01XCFA1+BFwbeACjwi1c72xiC/nIB593L0fNBaraRGBjzUAdCY0Gfit6Pv6LQSEZJXwEVG9Me8fLAmzFiHoKjdkAFUyaHd3L216xILvAOfLDCz0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.in; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=3Pvpc5nJoCaj3FhWdGIsOEV0AzwrsZCW85STetU5vbOOSkk3S+a3qEHSHA8yM6U4t5qtrmU6v2kl95NCaBxHD4bcqiLsFkzDjgZVbafD4i/8EGEkebIrPwpBxEIDBhOoYrHoJmONGv+KbQ91TGnNXVjy3Meo9VK3cL/pV6+dR48=; Message-ID: <568792.52464.qm@web95108.mail.in2.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 0C4lDd4VM1kCe9nCPTeyMUumhjR2Y6sehNlt6pU1FwjypQ_ eTrOV.EfsObLdnBaAn3_6cdMAdDlifUD7vVtVl0dW9FKS.Pf3eCX3K7cYog7 7MpSV_P8UlO0l50zKcO7ayXRvGTsmuhRqoY59IgKq75k14KIzcKAEkceWkpA kIPThOu_abYM0FANr8KamSYJ1fGHGmgHmkFoQ Received: from [122.172.189.43] by web95108.mail.in2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:40:38 IST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/497 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:40:38 +0530 (IST) From: akash kumar To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:00:36 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: preemption enable/disable routines X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:23:34 -0000 Hi,=0A=0ACan some one tell me the routines in freebsd to enable and disable= preemption.=0AIn linux we have preempt_enable and preempt_disable which do= es the =0Afunctionality.=0A=0AIn case freebsd, doesnot have such routines c= an i used mtx_lock_spin() to do the =0Asame?=0A=0AThanks,=0AAkash. =0A=0A= =0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 16:28:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DDE4106566B for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:28:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from ethic.thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C5418FC08 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:28:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thought.org (tao.thought.org [10.47.0.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by ethic.thought.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o8SGSgE5020577 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 09:28:42 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: by thought.org (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1002 kline@thought.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 09:28:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 09:28:41 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20100928162839.GA32198@thought.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 24 years of service to the Unix community. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.9 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on ethic.thought.org Cc: Subject: what is from with this picture? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:28:46 -0000 I have been trying to install ubuntu as a desktop while maintaining freebsd as my server. A few days ago mail was working. But, checking my /var/logs/ on my ubuntu I see: Sep 28 09:10:46 newtao postfix/smtp[8064]: 73A14E81F39: to=, relay=mx01.schlund.de[212.227.15.169]:25, delay=80279, delays=80275/0.02/3/0.64, dsn=4.0.0, status=deferred (host mx01.schlund.de[212.227.15.169] said: 421 invalid sender domain 'newtao.thought.org' (misconfigured dns?) (in reply to RCPT TO command)) Sep 28 09:13:51 newtao postfix/pickup[7946]: DD383E81092: uid=1001 from= Sep 28 09:13:51 newtao postfix/cleanup[8173]: DD383E81092: message-id=<20100928161349.GA8164@thought.org> Sep 28 09:13:51 newtao postfix/qmgr[2090]: DD383E81092: from=, size=874, nrcpt=1 (queue active) By default, postfix was installed on my ubuntu desktop. I am not familiar with it. I would =like= it to be sending mail to my server without the $HOST name instead of $HOST.$DOMAIN name. I know there are a bunch of us who use this kind of setup: FreeBSD for server things and some version of linux as a desktop. Really, this looks like a postfix blunder. How do I tell postfix to rewrite th e outgoing address without the hostname? tia, gary PS: FWIW: I still have the oldtao alive and well. It's just old and overdue for replacement. -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix The 7.83a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php http://journey.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 16:36:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B4DD1065673 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:36:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ryan.coleman@cwis.biz) Received: from qmta02.westchester.pa.hmc1.comcast.net (qmta02.westchester.pa.hmc1.comcast.net [76.96.53.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD9118FC0A for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:36:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta02.westchester.pa.hmc1.comcast.net ([76.96.53.7]) by qmta02.westchester.pa.hmc1.comcast.net with comcast id CAyP1f00o09Ku2s09GcGd7; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:36:16 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.9] ([70.89.202.1]) by omta02.westchester.pa.hmc1.comcast.net with bizsmtp id CGcF1f00202K3z202GcFPQ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:36:16 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) From: Ryan Coleman In-Reply-To: <20100928162839.GA32198@thought.org> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:36:14 -0500 Message-Id: <7B0DAD9C-ED75-4188-9407-F86F44C94F47@cwis.biz> References: <20100928162839.GA32198@thought.org> To: Gary Kline X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: what is from with this picture? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:36:17 -0000 I just did a check for thought.org and even it doesn't exist. Is your DNS host down? Did your domain expire? (Just checked the WHOIS = and no, it's up through 2015) This may or may not be anything but neither your primary nor secondary = Name Servers respond to pings: > Ryan-Colemans-MacBook-Pro:~ ryanjcole$ ping ns1.silvertree.org > PING ns1.silvertree.org (173.11.101.153): 56 data bytes > Request timeout for icmp_seq 0 > Request timeout for icmp_seq 1 > Ryan-Colemans-MacBook-Pro:~ ryanjcole$ ping ns1.thought.org > PING ns1.thought.org (209.180.213.210): 56 data bytes > Request timeout for icmp_seq 0 > Request timeout for icmp_seq 1 > Ryan-Colemans-MacBook-Pro:~ ryanjcole$ ping thought.org > ping: cannot resolve thought.org: Unknown host > Ryan-Colemans-MacBook-Pro:~ ryanjcole$ ping www.thought.org > PING ethic.thought.org (209.180.213.210): 56 data bytes > Request timeout for icmp_seq 0 > Request timeout for icmp_seq 1 > Ryan-Colemans-MacBook-Pro:~ ryanjcole$ ping ethic.thought.org > PING ethic.thought.org (209.180.213.210): 56 data bytes > Request timeout for icmp_seq 0 > Request timeout for icmp_seq 1 > Request timeout for icmp_seq 2 You can't have a sending domain as thought.org if the @ record for = thought.org doesn't exist, IIRC. Look to your DNS for the solution, IMNSHO. -- Ryan On Sep 28, 2010, at 11:28 AM, Gary Kline wrote: >=20 > I have been trying to install ubuntu as a desktop while maintaining > freebsd as my server. A few days ago mail was working. But, checking > my /var/logs/ on my ubuntu I see: >=20 >=20 > Sep 28 09:10:46 newtao postfix/smtp[8064]: 73A14E81F39: > to=3D, relay=3Dmx01.schlund.de[212.227.15.169]:25, > delay=3D80279, delays=3D80275/0.02/3/0.64, dsn=3D4.0.0, = status=3Ddeferred (host > mx01.schlund.de[212.227.15.169] said: 421 invalid sender domain > 'newtao.thought.org' (misconfigured dns?) (in reply to RCPT TO = command)) > Sep 28 09:13:51 newtao postfix/pickup[7946]: DD383E81092: uid=3D1001 = from=3D > Sep 28 09:13:51 newtao postfix/cleanup[8173]: DD383E81092: > message-id=3D<20100928161349.GA8164@thought.org> > Sep 28 09:13:51 newtao postfix/qmgr[2090]: DD383E81092: > from=3D, size=3D874, nrcpt=3D1 (queue = active) >=20 >=20 > By default, postfix was installed on my ubuntu desktop. I am not > familiar with it. I would =3Dlike=3D it to be sending mail to my = server > without the $HOST name instead of $HOST.$DOMAIN name. I know there = are > a bunch of us who use this kind of setup: FreeBSD for server things = and > some version of linux as a desktop. >=20 > Really, this looks like a postfix blunder. How do I tell postfix to > rewrite th e outgoing address without the hostname? >=20 > tia, >=20 > gary >=20 > PS: FWIW: I still have the oldtao alive and well. It's just old and > overdue for replacement. >=20 >=20 > --=20 > Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service = Unix > The 7.83a release of Jottings: = http://jottings.thought.org/index.php > http://journey.thought.org >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 16:44:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7FDC106564A for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:44:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ryan.coleman@cwis.biz) Received: from qmta01.westchester.pa.hmc1.comcast.net (qmta01.westchester.pa.hmc1.comcast.net [76.96.53.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9814D8FC08 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:44:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta01.westchester.pa.hmc1.comcast.net ([76.96.53.6]) by qmta01.westchester.pa.hmc1.comcast.net with comcast id CClH1f002082Dic01GkjD2; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:44:43 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.9] ([70.89.202.1]) by omta01.westchester.pa.hmc1.comcast.net with bizsmtp id CGki1f00402K3z201GkjC4; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:44:43 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) From: Ryan Coleman In-Reply-To: <7B0DAD9C-ED75-4188-9407-F86F44C94F47@cwis.biz> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:44:42 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <19639A29-A22D-474B-8CD6-E62D2A4CCB15@cwis.biz> References: <20100928162839.GA32198@thought.org> <7B0DAD9C-ED75-4188-9407-F86F44C94F47@cwis.biz> To: Gary Kline , FreeBSD Mailing List X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Cc: Subject: Re: what is from [sic (wrong)] with this picture? -- Answer: It's Ubuntu, not FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:44:45 -0000 And, lastly, I will add this quote: > I have been trying to install ubuntu as a desktop while maintaining > freebsd as my server. A few days ago mail was working. But, checking > my /var/logs/ on my ubuntu I see: You are asking a FreeBSD list about Ubuntu? ... You'll find some help, = not a lot and mostly people ignoring your messages. On Sep 28, 2010, at 11:36 AM, Ryan Coleman wrote: > I just did a check for thought.org and even it doesn't exist. >=20 > Is your DNS host down? Did your domain expire? (Just checked the WHOIS = and no, it's up through 2015) >=20 > This may or may not be anything but neither your primary nor secondary = Name Servers respond to pings: >> Ryan-Colemans-MacBook-Pro:~ ryanjcole$ ping ns1.silvertree.org >> PING ns1.silvertree.org (173.11.101.153): 56 data bytes >> Request timeout for icmp_seq 0 >> Request timeout for icmp_seq 1 >=20 >> Ryan-Colemans-MacBook-Pro:~ ryanjcole$ ping ns1.thought.org >> PING ns1.thought.org (209.180.213.210): 56 data bytes >> Request timeout for icmp_seq 0 >> Request timeout for icmp_seq 1 >=20 >> Ryan-Colemans-MacBook-Pro:~ ryanjcole$ ping thought.org >> ping: cannot resolve thought.org: Unknown host >=20 >> Ryan-Colemans-MacBook-Pro:~ ryanjcole$ ping www.thought.org >> PING ethic.thought.org (209.180.213.210): 56 data bytes >> Request timeout for icmp_seq 0 >> Request timeout for icmp_seq 1 >=20 >> Ryan-Colemans-MacBook-Pro:~ ryanjcole$ ping ethic.thought.org >> PING ethic.thought.org (209.180.213.210): 56 data bytes >> Request timeout for icmp_seq 0 >> Request timeout for icmp_seq 1 >> Request timeout for icmp_seq 2 >=20 > You can't have a sending domain as thought.org if the @ record for = thought.org doesn't exist, IIRC. >=20 > Look to your DNS for the solution, IMNSHO. >=20 > -- > Ryan >=20 > On Sep 28, 2010, at 11:28 AM, Gary Kline wrote: >=20 >>=20 >> I have been trying to install ubuntu as a desktop while maintaining >> freebsd as my server. A few days ago mail was working. But, = checking >> my /var/logs/ on my ubuntu I see: >>=20 >>=20 >> Sep 28 09:10:46 newtao postfix/smtp[8064]: 73A14E81F39: >> to=3D, relay=3Dmx01.schlund.de[212.227.15.169]:25, >> delay=3D80279, delays=3D80275/0.02/3/0.64, dsn=3D4.0.0, = status=3Ddeferred (host >> mx01.schlund.de[212.227.15.169] said: 421 invalid sender domain >> 'newtao.thought.org' (misconfigured dns?) (in reply to RCPT TO = command)) >> Sep 28 09:13:51 newtao postfix/pickup[7946]: DD383E81092: uid=3D1001 = from=3D >> Sep 28 09:13:51 newtao postfix/cleanup[8173]: DD383E81092: >> message-id=3D<20100928161349.GA8164@thought.org> >> Sep 28 09:13:51 newtao postfix/qmgr[2090]: DD383E81092: >> from=3D, size=3D874, nrcpt=3D1 (queue = active) >>=20 >>=20 >> By default, postfix was installed on my ubuntu desktop. I am not >> familiar with it. I would =3Dlike=3D it to be sending mail to my = server >> without the $HOST name instead of $HOST.$DOMAIN name. I know there = are >> a bunch of us who use this kind of setup: FreeBSD for server things = and >> some version of linux as a desktop. >>=20 >> Really, this looks like a postfix blunder. How do I tell postfix to >> rewrite th e outgoing address without the hostname? >>=20 >> tia, >>=20 >> gary >>=20 >> PS: FWIW: I still have the oldtao alive and well. It's just old and >> overdue for replacement. >>=20 >>=20 >> --=20 >> Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service = Unix >> The 7.83a release of Jottings: = http://jottings.thought.org/index.php >> http://journey.thought.org >>=20 >>=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 17:06:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CDBB1065673 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:06:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CFED8FC18 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:06:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm9 with SMTP id 9so4781988fxm.13 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:06:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.24.20 with SMTP id b20mr425093muj.81.1285693586810; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:06:26 -0700 (PDT) Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.223.68.140 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:06:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <568792.52464.qm@web95108.mail.in2.yahoo.com> References: <568792.52464.qm@web95108.mail.in2.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 13:06:26 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: -VoynTJJBYHONiRO229ZbIi9mPk Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: akash kumar Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: preemption enable/disable routines X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:06:29 -0000 On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 10:10 AM, akash kumar wrote: > Hi, > > Can some one tell me the routines in freebsd to enable and disable preemption. > In linux we have preempt_enable and preempt_disable which does the > functionality. > > In case freebsd, doesnot have such routines can i used mtx_lock_spin() to do the > same? Very similar and for the mostly the same purpose. Install the man/doc and then; man mutex Best, Alejandro Imass > > Thanks, > Akash. > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 17:50:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F317A106566B for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:50:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from relay.pcl-ipout01.plus.net (relay.pcl-ipout01.plus.net [212.159.7.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 830208FC19 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:50:27 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAB7IoUxUXebr/2dsb2JhbACiHnHNAIVEBA Received: from outmx07.plus.net ([84.93.230.235]) by relay.pcl-ipout01.plus.net with ESMTP; 28 Sep 2010 18:50:25 +0100 Received: from helix.plus.com ([84.92.153.232] helo=curlew.milibyte.co.uk) by outmx07.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1P0eJt-0001Ht-Fc; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 18:50:25 +0100 Received: by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P0eJs-0000hS-4c; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 18:50:24 +0100 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 18:50:23 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <20100926123019.GA41450@lpthe.jussieu.fr> <201009271016.26902.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> <4ca19305.qVDnt7/ifQhIrQ0c%perryh@pluto.rain.com> In-Reply-To: <4ca19305.qVDnt7/ifQhIrQ0c%perryh@pluto.rain.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201009281850.23976.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: perryh@pluto.rain.com Subject: Re: Free BSD 8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:50:28 -0000 On Tuesday 28 September 2010, perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > Mike Clarke wrote: [snip] > > The problem is if/when you need to update a port as a result of > > a security advisory. If your ports tree is very much out of date > > then it's likely that updating that one port will require a number > > of dependencies to be updated as well, sometimes all the ports > > depending on one or more of the updated dependencies need to be > > updated as well and the resultant bag of worms can take quite a > > lot of sorting out. The "little and often" approach of keeping > > the ports tree up to date could be less traumatic. > > and, in this context, your point is? > > I'm advocating starting from a stable and self-consistent baseline, > consisting of a release _and_ its corresponding port/package > collection, and then considering whether any updates are needed. > Isn't that orthogonal to the question of whether or not to follow > ports updates, once the baseline has been established? > _______________________________________________ Well I'd normally happy to stay with the original release state without having to have the "latest & greatest" version of each application but I prefer to update any ports which have been flagged by portaudit as having security vulnerabilities and this is when the problem could arise. Updating a single port in isolation without updating the ports tree can lead to problems with dependencies so you invariably need to update your ports tree and update the dependencies for the port in question. If, for example, you were to build a web server by installing 8.1-RELEASE and the matching package for apache you would have apache-2.2.15_9 which suffers from a remote DoS bug and should be upgraded to 2.2.16 . As Warren Block has pointed out elsewhere in this thread there's usually a flurry of port updates when the ports tree is unfrozen just after a release so if you now update the ports tree and upgrade your ports there could be a large number of ports to upgrade, most of them can be upgraded quite painlessly with portmaster or portupgrade but you'd need to check /usr/ports/UPDATING to see if any of them needed special attention, fixing a single special case is usually quite straightforward but things sometimes get more complex when there's several. If on the other hand you installed the base system, updated your ports tree and then built what you needed from ports (or the latest packages) you'd get the latest versions without having to sort out any conflicts. If you wait a long time before a new vulnerability pushes you into doing your next upgrade then you'll still probably have quite a lot to sort out but updating small numbers of ports more frequently usually involves less work than an occasional mega upgrade. Well, that's just my 2 cents worth and it does depend on how many ports you have. A minimal server setup with few ports will probably not need very frequent port upgrades but something like a desktop could easily have 700 or more ports and it can be quite messy to upgrade your ports if it's been a long time since the last upgrade. -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 18:05:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0480106566B for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 18:05:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from williamlang1@hotmail.com) Received: from snt0-omc2-s5.snt0.hotmail.com (snt0-omc2-s5.snt0.hotmail.com [65.55.90.80]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 942DF8FC08 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 18:05:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from SNT121-DS1 ([65.55.90.72]) by snt0-omc2-s5.snt0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:53:12 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [98.88.174.112] X-Originating-Email: [williamlang1@hotmail.com] Message-ID: From: William Lang To: Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 13:52:56 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 thread-index: ActfNfsUYof1j7fdRa+qBtnqPFjRgQ== Content-Language: en-us X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Sep 2010 17:53:12.0588 (UTC) FILETIME=[04EFACC0:01CB5F36] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 18:12:44 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Booting up FreeBSD 8.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 18:05:13 -0000 I have just installed FreeBSD 8.0 and after I login it stops at $ like its waiting for me to put some type of information in or something. So what do I put after the dollar sign??? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 18:25:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD6C41065670 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 18:25:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@insightbb.com) Received: from mxsf11.insightbb.com (mxsf11.insightbb.com [74.128.0.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 892B38FC16 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 18:25:12 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,248,1283745600"; d="scan'208";a="213474003" Received: from unknown (HELO asav01.insightbb.com) ([172.31.249.123]) by mxsf11.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 28 Sep 2010 14:25:11 -0400 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnAvANrPoUxKgCiCO2dsb2JhbACiHQwBAQEBNS3MboMECAEJgi4EiU4 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,248,1283745600"; d="scan'208";a="286487652" Received: from 74-128-40-130.dhcp.insightbb.com (HELO laptop2.stevenfriedrich.org) ([74.128.40.130]) by asavout01.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 28 Sep 2010 14:25:11 -0400 From: Steven Friedrich To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, William Lang Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:25:13 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.1-RELEASE; KDE/4.5.1; i386; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201009281425.14417.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> Cc: Subject: Re: Booting up FreeBSD 8.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 18:25:12 -0000 On Tuesday 28 September 2010 1:52:56 pm William Lang wrote: > I have just installed FreeBSD 8.0 and after I login it stops at $ like its > waiting for me to put some type of information in or something. So what do > I put after the dollar sign??? > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" You haven't indicated what your level of expertise is with unix in general, what other software you have installed, or what your goals are. Have you added additional user IDs to the system or just root? If you're logged in as root, I wouldn't rn X from that account, though it may be sfe these days, I don't kow. I'd create another userID, perhaps admin, and assign it to group wheel. This group wil allow you to su root when you need the authority. If you're logged in as a non-root user, such as admin (which doesn't exist unless yo add it), then try startx. -- System Name: laptop2.StevenFriedrich.org Hardware: 2.80GHz Intel Pentium 4 (HTT) with 2 GB memory OS version: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE i386 (6.9 MB kernel) manager(s): kde4-4.5.1 X windows: xorg-7.5 X.Org X Server 1.7.5 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 18:27:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B43D31065672 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 18:27:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout023.mac.com (asmtpout023.mac.com [17.148.16.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C6908FC0A for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 18:27:03 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp023.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0L9G00A70Z8RO370@asmtp023.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:26:52 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1004200000 definitions=main-1009280126 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.0.10011,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-09-28_11:2010-09-28, 2010-09-28, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 11:25:51 -0700 Message-id: References: To: William Lang X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Booting up FreeBSD 8.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 18:27:03 -0000 On Sep 28, 2010, at 10:52 AM, William Lang wrote: > I have just installed FreeBSD 8.0 and after I login it stops at $ like its > waiting for me to put some type of information in or something. So what do I > put after the dollar sign??? You're at a Unix shell prompt. I suspect the resources here will be helpful: http://www.freebsd.org/projects/newbies.html http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/new-users/article.html Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 20:11:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB1C106566C for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 20:11:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from relay.ptn-ipout01.plus.net (relay.ptn-ipout01.plus.net [212.159.7.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64CBE8FC13 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 20:11:22 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Al4FAPzgoUxUXeb6/2dsb2JhbACUHo4Bcc0tgwQIgjgE Received: from outmx05.plus.net ([84.93.230.250]) by relay.ptn-ipout01.plus.net with ESMTP; 28 Sep 2010 20:42:06 +0100 Received: from helix.plus.com ([84.92.153.232] helo=curlew.milibyte.co.uk) by outmx05.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1P0g3x-0005jZ-Kz for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 20:42:05 +0100 Received: by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1P0g3w-0000nk-5w for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 20:42:04 +0100 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 20:42:04 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <20100928120025.2A6EC10656DC@hub.freebsd.org> <20100928225602.C62022@sola.nimnet.asn.au> In-Reply-To: <20100928225602.C62022@sola.nimnet.asn.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201009282042.04131.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Re: Free BSD 8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 20:11:23 -0000 On Tuesday 28 September 2010, Ian Smith wrote: > I agree with Mike about the worms :) =A0I have an 8.0-RELEASE system > with many ports installed and quite a few configured to taste with a > recently upgraded 8-STABLE world, working through a huge portversion > update list, started by fetching over 900MB of packages so far > including X and KDE by portupgrade -aFPP. =A0It's going to take a > while, and I'll be surprised if I don't skin a few knuckles on > circular dependencies along the way. I used to use packages in preference to ports but, being on a PAYG=20 broadband account rather than unlimited, I'm more concerned about=20 bandwidth than compile time. I found that upgrading ports often=20 involved just a few packages which had actually been changed while the=20 rest just had their version number bumped as a result of dependencies=20 but still needed the entire package to be downloaded. Switching to=20 building the ports instead means that I usually only need to download a=20 relatively small number of distfiles with the remaining ports being=20 recompiled from my existing collection of distfiles using the new=20 makefiles in the updated ports tree. =2D-=20 Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 28 23:52:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA70C106564A for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 23:52:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fusionfoto@yahoo.com) Received: from web50007.mail.re2.yahoo.com (web50007.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.38.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 82BC48FC0C for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 23:52:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24097 invoked by uid 60001); 28 Sep 2010 23:25:34 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1285716334; bh=NC2SzGbkW3YKSssakSG3jmxT6+fuVYH5G3ZSK2VkDHg=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=whAqqa5v6trOqie0qeOn9SeDosHfa93W69sYZmENTE99d9jcV2rckd2ZgPtRfnJyu1hmMjGmiShRt2E26Skz9zaVQDoP0H3vDEVdJKEegtu8X+NHnbkVywnO2zh7b2WFKsRlyEaxGiDwW21pDE98SIJxQSVc6W+LRu1tHzBjmjc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=dSEI/lWp5CdUpGPZEh1DTBereZtjR9mDHd4r+KAvvoH0YoK1tE8sEpQN8qhhfgyUmGyw4bmDWaMUBkXTFD7f+TPNGDeoeK0HzKU9lvTEprWOZfJoS28mOU+fjIHAyZO759RFtXvUv+p23fpSkbwnGzUCVLTFKdeMQ41xQmyl8ZQ=; Message-ID: <476891.22114.qm@web50007.mail.re2.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 8cAbAdsVM1k34Gqr3Fy3CHsZHOxubAH4RLG3_kSDtXjwODs ungdiiexp5LzWl8ObzSTpBqAvmGQmtBxL8NgZ9YJHDiXPUJpZn2.vuHeW2FM r5iJELIMk5KQKqgMXQfycX7208TYPbeNhui9UgTLA21brwl6t_I.u6.aomSN eUH75JT0.vGjgIKEiJQaWB_gdI9CccsZFB300XSYd1vDp7V7K9ubLmUTvlsd otyzy4cm1_HgClL1ha01cc1bX45poL6q4qQehQ7Uv4WPnjiMpwHe2b4z7k2z hWRzdE3CE6Dti5URLgRi0ATuxxwIELzDwIlKIY03zoTV5YLvHIiHdYJUBjBt XiZ.I7PM_WRfR5ciW Received: from [205.134.160.6] by web50007.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:25:34 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.9 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 16:25:34 -0700 (PDT) From: DJ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: smartctl/ada/FreeBSD 8.1 more than 10 devices? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 23:52:16 -0000 I'm seeing something odd and don't know if its a function of the new ada/ah= ci driver support in smartmontools 5.38 and later. I'm running 5.39.1 on an array using SiL3124 controllers with port multipli= ers. # smartctl -i /dev/ada9 smartctl 5.39.1 2010-01-28 r3054 [FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE amd64] (local build) Copyright (C) 2002-10 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net =3D=3D=3D START OF INFORMATION SECTION =3D=3D=3D Model Family:=A0=A0=A0=A0 Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 family Device Model:=A0=A0=A0=A0 ST31500341AS Serial Number:=A0=A0=A0 9VS40ZGX Firmware Version: CC1H User Capacity:=A0=A0=A0 1,500,301,910,016 bytes Device is:=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 In smartctl database [for details use: -P s= how] ATA Version is:=A0=A0 8 ATA Standard is:=A0 ATA-8-ACS revision 4 Local Time is:=A0=A0=A0 Tue Sep 28 19:22:19 2010 EDT SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability. SMART support is: Enabled # smartctl -i /dev/ada10 smartctl 5.39.1 2010-01-28 r3054 [FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE amd64] (local build) Copyright (C) 2002-10 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net =3D=3D=3D START OF INFORMATION SECTION =3D=3D=3D Model Family:=A0=A0=A0=A0 Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 family Device Model:=A0=A0=A0=A0 ST31500341AS Serial Number:=A0=A0=A0 9VS2JN79 Firmware Version: CC1H User Capacity:=A0=A0=A0 1,500,301,910,016 bytes Device is:=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 In smartctl database [for details use: -P s= how] ATA Version is:=A0=A0 8 ATA Standard is:=A0 ATA-8-ACS revision 4 Local Time is:=A0=A0=A0 Tue Sep 28 19:22:34 2010 EDT SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability. SMART support is: Enabled # smartctl -i /dev/ada11 smartctl 5.39.1 2010-01-28 r3054 [FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE amd64] (local build) Copyright (C) 2002-10 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net /dev/ada11: Unable to detect device type Smartctl: please specify device type with the -d option. Use smartctl -h to get a usage summary --- .... since all the drives, cables and controllers are identical, I'm trying= to figure out if there is something *else* I should be looking into for wh= y smart would have an issue, but the rest of the OS has no issues with thes= e drives.=A0 (zfs is storing data, reports them all as online, etc). I look= ed into the smartctl code, and there definitely is a carve out for FreeBSD = 8.1 or later, but I don't know enough about the new internals to know if th= e is any kind of concern parsing more than 10 drives, etc. Thanks in advance! DJ =0A=0A=0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 00:14:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F4BF106566B for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:14:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from korvus@comcast.net) Received: from qmta05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C2738FC15 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:14:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.19]) by qmta05.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id CBFl1f0070QuhwU55QElfH; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:14:45 +0000 Received: from [10.0.0.51] ([71.199.122.142]) by omta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id CQEl1f00234Sj4f3NQElqu; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:14:45 +0000 Message-ID: <4CA28503.4080903@comcast.net> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 20:14:59 -0400 From: Steve Polyack User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: DJ References: <476891.22114.qm@web50007.mail.re2.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <476891.22114.qm@web50007.mail.re2.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: smartctl/ada/FreeBSD 8.1 more than 10 devices? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:14:45 -0000 On 9/28/2010 7:25 PM, DJ wrote: > I'm seeing something odd and don't know if its a function of the new ada/ahci driver support in smartmontools 5.38 and later. > > I'm running 5.39.1 on an array using SiL3124 controllers with port multipliers. ... > # smartctl -i /dev/ada11 > smartctl 5.39.1 2010-01-28 r3054 [FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE amd64] (local build) > Copyright (C) 2002-10 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net > > /dev/ada11: Unable to detect device type > Smartctl: please specify device type with the -d option. > > Use smartctl -h to get a usage summary > > > --- > > .... since all the drives, cables and controllers are identical, I'm trying to figure out if there is something *else* I should be looking into for why smart would have an issue, but the rest of the OS has no issues with these drives. (zfs is storing data, reports them all as online, etc). I looked into the smartctl code, and there definitely is a carve out for FreeBSD 8.1 or later, but I don't know enough about the new internals to know if the is any kind of concern parsing more than 10 drives, etc. DJ, I have a similar setup with a fair amount of drives on a few Sil3124 controllers and port multipliers. I can't speak for why smartctl cannot automatically detect the device type, but if you specify '-d atacam', then it will work just fine: $ sudo smartctl -i /dev/ada11 smartctl 5.39.1 2010-01-28 r3054 [FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE amd64] (local build) Copyright (C) 2002-10 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net /dev/ada11: Unable to detect device type Smartctl: please specify device type with the -d option. Use smartctl -h to get a usage summary $ sudo smartctl -d atacam -i /dev/ada11 smartctl 5.39.1 2010-01-28 r3054 [FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE amd64] (local build) Copyright (C) 2002-10 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net === START OF INFORMATION SECTION === Model Family: Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 family Device Model: ST31500341AS ... Also, out of curiosity, are you using the ahci(4) driver or the siis(4) driver? Steve Polyack From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 00:30:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 848BB1065672 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:30:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fusionfoto@yahoo.com) Received: from web50008.mail.re2.yahoo.com (web50008.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.38.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 346318FC0A for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:30:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 88439 invoked by uid 60001); 29 Sep 2010 00:30:24 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1285720224; bh=Fbhd9tiXgTZjXAAfKlnhlvqisKY8xdwYhIdjU2UgASI=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=fOnB4w+KgRZqIS7LzXWvfhSR/kXZdGDhCHY8AYKVi1xcQI0g4DmpGF8vys4HkaNdvbiIFAURNytLesOBE8iq5qbIYkEhmkT2UAG6aP3NFl0FQ9L7/zJZ3ES6arW9q8rfyJzbgenpTXJ6+ckTbL4+A7obtjSs9KPPyuiGXHVmqCk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Gr4njNZO0QdWyFh+MwwI/+0grpVYeZWGeo/S/5iA00lQRhdO/j467aChjetmKowf2N8r8pBtCqFvKanu8Jkzovr2rQulJozc6YcpdB4RsJYfJX4siEXmGEwBuyZft/dj0J1m3bxHa+h/DuMFgY3uy72M61Xnelu9eOP+C/mwmak=; Message-ID: <301384.79702.qm@web50008.mail.re2.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: FWrYS6oVM1lRrDgjx_J31xx0aCveTrmgbSIaAAj7kXpriUy ufw6WHfgwkNDuMlhWu0h3XQ2kcTXO2vblLRy1PkUb9x8qtOUoSvVGpxFyOlg HmVjt6z8QWfMqNl2Yj9cRUnQ7rQdSe8kACZ2blhN9feLjmL7SiB6XZQRGzir .Z4_ex82HoZv1LmzkaznEI257UyY7w7baPrmZZ4SG5n5XVYfO7Mhz1Q4mqO7 gzwzXiP9kl_vdKCe3_YUuZhJjw47b_eVJLTJ3wlY37k9vO4S5_epn3IovwIP WKmrGjuK02Ma9OJCpRGjq7zhk1uXbhhTy6BkY5F7JNi4_LjMu Received: from [205.134.163.4] by web50008.mail.re2.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:30:24 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.9 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:30:24 -0700 (PDT) From: DJ To: Steve Polyack In-Reply-To: <4CA28503.4080903@comcast.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: smartctl/ada/FreeBSD 8.1 more than 10 devices? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 00:30:25 -0000 > .... since all the drives, cables and controllers are identical, I'm tryi= ng to figure out if there is something *else* I should be looking into for = why smart would have an issue, but the rest of the OS has no issues with th= ese drives.=A0 (zfs is storing data, reports them all as online, etc). I lo= oked into the smartctl code, and there definitely is a carve out for FreeBS= D 8.1 or later, but I don't know enough about the new internals to know if = the is any kind of concern parsing more than 10 drives, etc. Use smartctl -h to get a usage summary $ sudo smartctl -d atacam -i /dev/ada11 smartctl 5.39.1 2010-01-28 r3054 [FreeBSD 8.0-STABLE amd64] (local build) Copyright (C) 2002-10 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net =3D=3D=3D START OF INFORMATION SECTION =3D=3D=3D Model Family:=A0 =A0=A0=A0Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 family Device Model:=A0 =A0=A0=A0ST31500341AS ... Also, out of curiosity, are you using the ahci(4) driver or the siis(4)=20 driver? Thank you - fantastic! I tried the -d atacam before I sent the email, but I obviously specified it= incorrectly because I wrote the message anyway. This solves the issue, not= sure why it can't detect it. To answer your follow up question, I started using just siis, but added ahc= i to allow ahci functions. As far as I can tell, AHCI functions add on top = of the SIIS ones. The boot compact flash (not on the SIIS card) converted t= o ada from ad once ahci was loaded. DJ =0A=0A=0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 02:40:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10524106564A for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 02:40:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vyaaghrah-nix@yahoo.com) Received: from n4-vm0.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (n4-vm0.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [67.195.9.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C12D28FC0C for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 02:40:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [67.195.9.83] by n4.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 29 Sep 2010 02:40:14 -0000 Received: from [67.195.9.100] by t3.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 29 Sep 2010 02:40:14 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp104.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 29 Sep 2010 02:40:14 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 999932.2220.bm@omp104.mail.gq1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 44489 invoked by uid 60001); 29 Sep 2010 02:40:13 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1285728013; bh=TvEQug4a/WzyTqFJoROX9iwKOET5EsEgE0nNa/G/6c4=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=3uysUV3dc2NRoA8CMKJr0DXQcPIa0LKghuFBI/M/psRF+RrREzzR0Q6Xlx4o5k3rfaml/2bCd5tAniWsDHo47NvyRVpU4fqAa1czEiLwOppntaTP/PPSSYLdlwfxCqSZ1hKxYzQ1KW6F6C1KYDjes6urGGykRa88X+45sq4PSBw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ngBRd79ycitQUd1zao51dvHvBQjxwYWVe1paY4YmA6jKcuBkpG6S09usOI+x4klOXKlf00fkumfesV3XD//eGb1cCM1JGrZ5+/FDZ3fUw6aUc/gXcjVCSB5rOwYcpEIxEBXLIekpbuEVXvRmNz2gS5gTGm5+yb93jP9UWvUukhY=; Message-ID: <800348.43799.qm@web113901.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: MJAxoygVM1lcolHSts7vZGVA.xf4yGI9BF66fdtLgHdYowU fkZld4q4f Received: from [116.197.178.83] by web113901.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:40:13 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/497 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:40:13 -0700 (PDT) From: vyaaghrah-nix@yahoo.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Cache Memory in top command X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 02:40:15 -0000 Hi Everybody How is Cache memory in the following output calculated, on Free BSD system. last pid: 39307; load averages: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00 up 60+18:16:49 10:00:17 25 processes: 1 running, 24 sleeping CPU states: 0.0% user, 0.0% nice, 0.0% system, 0.0% interrupt, 100% idle Mem: 12M Active, 171M Inact, 68M Wired, 36K Cache, 111M Buf, 750M Free Swap: 4000M Total, 4000M Free Regards Abhijeet.C From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 02:50:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62DF21065675 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 02:50:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E91C98FC14 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 02:50:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm9 with SMTP id 9so280195fxm.13 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:50:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=LkxErcLmexHFw0zBWlaukmfvxVz3n7j3iAF51nTJTOY=; b=FXDG3nMBj1W1J/WSM+yw5p0NpUlxZ9rFp1zxIpFNN9q3dBmqLvw0y5+JvGTfpvB1Td RFL3Ixz6obMw7L6FRDQ8yChJU4H4fUu48fs054Dfmio9xBNl0Xg6Crz0k5haSFznA9ZI e/JdLlbigvBZnmgwSgUUb6UWc/gHv2Q45xrNA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=DVT9SZi6wNsgQrGg6rdKgwdIenRkCh3UqKypYKSI1dKLl7JT7fvhAGqD9pPq8lkR6D 1LEJxZ6mXH35wRIj8MnBE/auFPN9i5mt6znbNdQUcvf55DUCLaTF+Cq7rr9UqQ028ryL wiN5DksQzTQc0xmhptiZCJymzh4M6LuOvvwk4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.116.19 with SMTP id k19mr963308faq.48.1285728643817; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:50:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.114.79 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:50:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <800348.43799.qm@web113901.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <800348.43799.qm@web113901.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 21:50:43 -0500 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: vyaaghrah-nix@yahoo.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cache Memory in top command X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 02:50:45 -0000 On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:40 PM, wrote: > Hi Everybody > > How is Cache memory in the following output calculated, on Free BSD system. > man 1 top -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 02:59:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ADEB106567A for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 02:59:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEEE08FC1D for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 02:59:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm9 with SMTP id 9so283248fxm.13 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:59:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=rswWNkZWX+ZIROuVunPNYqGJWvRXyTsVK2shpM/v9oI=; b=tIYdpP/10sbKSlOedrVsE3PEBrQfVYyhg7J9twuZMqzkV4hIZltPez85ROubcNHy5p MkpVIH8cc2Yavkl33ivuj3WL5xj4O91IIlVty1p2Z4/WSAa85IUcxxFVjtV9GKz3QjP2 6Qwuq57Bcyhkopqz1pbmYvoZ6w+Q45aMgIg68= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=snaVj+VVcdc2yN0UpTp4ggDzNCrOxHlOnNLCk5y/UIch4pkDOsC2EmaJYrFO+Gc5QJ dq1c+t5NDv/x3qgAcobC67xDy6doCGprEzptLiuCp+/u2ECjou7McdH8mKtgXLg8ygGs H1V0TKfubLWeMZ34rMp5+HLZ+vhPSXOeFQjsA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.112.11 with SMTP id u11mr1030487fap.2.1285729189702; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:59:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.114.79 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:59:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 21:59:49 -0500 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Leif Walsh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linux filesystems accessible from FreeBSD 8-stable? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 02:59:51 -0000 On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Leif Walsh wrote: > I can't seem to get a definitive answer on this from the internet, > there's a lot of conflicting information. > > I have some data drives formatted with ext4, which I'd like to access > from freebsd, preferably without totally reformatting because I don't > have much temp space for copying. Read-only would be fine, read-write > would be much preferred. > > Is this possible? Not sure about the base system, but you could use this I think. I haven't actually used it on an ext4 FS, though it claims it's capable. sysutils/e2fsprogs -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 01:20:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEC4A106564A for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 01:20:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slowpoke@pathcom.com) Received: from esmtp09.pathcom.com (esmtp09.pathcom.com [209.250.157.153]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDB848FC14 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 01:20:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [216.249.8.108] (dial-0108.tor.pathcom.com [216.249.8.108]) by smtp-outbound04.tor.pathcom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADFE2300014C for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 21:20:11 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4CA29471.4000106@pathcom.com> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 21:20:49 -0400 From: victor kovacs User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100401 Thunderbird/3.0.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 03:15:03 +0000 Cc: Subject: Free BSD 8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 01:20:13 -0000 Mouse works in text mode in root and personal directories. Does not work in KDE graphics after startx is typed in personal directory. Graphics comes up normally. Using a ps2 mouse. Any suggestions? Regards, victor From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 03:53:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E8D1065670 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 03:53:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF40E8FC1E for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 03:53:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-226-229.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.226.229]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A4D43D704; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 05:53:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id o8T3rq3S001477; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 05:53:52 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 05:53:52 +0200 From: Polytropon To: victor kovacs Message-Id: <20100929055352.2c70020d.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4CA29471.4000106@pathcom.com> References: <4CA29471.4000106@pathcom.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Free BSD 8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 03:53:55 -0000 On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 21:20:49 -0400, victor kovacs wrote: > > > Mouse works in text mode in root and personal directories. > > Does not work in KDE graphics after startx is typed in personal directory. > > Graphics comes up normally. > > Using a ps2 mouse. > > Any suggestions? Check the mail archives related to using X with or without HAL and DBUS (depends on the setting you are using). When your mouse works in text mode, moused has correctly picked it up, so the problem seems to be on X's side. Check X configuration file /etc/X11/xorg.conf if you have any. Check your HAL and DBUS stuff. a) Want to use HAL and DBUS? Enable them in /etc/rc.conf b) Do not want to use HAL and DBUS? Modify xorg.conf's AutoAddDevice setting. You'll find more information about this in the mailing list archives and the FreeBSD handbook. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 04:46:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62501106566B for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 04:46:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from caleb.stein@me.com) Received: from asmtpout027.mac.com (asmtpout027.mac.com [17.148.16.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C7538FC13 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 04:46:04 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes Received: from win7x64.mshome.net ([67.183.141.251]) by asmtp027.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPA id <0L9H00J0HP3C8Y70@asmtp027.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 20:45:13 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1004200000 definitions=main-1009280230 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.0.10011,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-09-29_02:2010-09-29, 2010-09-29, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 20:45:09 -0700 From: Caleb Stein Message-id: User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.70 (Win32) Subject: Tuxpaint won't run X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 04:46:04 -0000 Whenever I run TuxPaint, it crashes, stating that it was compiled with png.h from libpng-1.4.3, but is running with png.c from libpng-1.2.40. When I run pkg_info|grep png, it says that png is at version 1.4.3. What is the problem? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 04:50:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FB9A1065694 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 04:50:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22FC28FC22 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 04:50:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-226-229.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.226.229]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 854242537D; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 06:50:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id o8T4oA3B001694; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 06:50:11 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 06:50:10 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Caleb Stein Message-Id: <20100929065010.52bcddc2.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tuxpaint won't run X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 04:50:13 -0000 On Tue, 28 Sep 2010 20:45:09 -0700, Caleb Stein wrote: > Whenever I run TuxPaint, it crashes, stating that it was compiled with > png.h from libpng-1.4.3, but is running with png.c from libpng-1.2.40. > When I run pkg_info|grep png, it says that png is at version 1.4.3. What > is the problem? Looks like TuxPaint is expecting 1.2.40, but 1.4.3 is present on your system. Recompile TuxPaint as it seems that something didn't go right with the compiling. Can you post the complete error message? -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 05:56:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D57B91065673 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 05:56:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drizzt321@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9608F8FC19 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 05:56:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwd6 with SMTP id 6so354139qwd.13 for ; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 22:56:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=PEEKkEz3WJGE7oL3cfqfdznAkNUdjUN6BFrzcM1cBBk=; b=swG9+E09JpjEhx0Ui551oEgRLWgGOS6eeVXhNxJeWNLeN6QoSIONZGJT6YcPrQdQh6 oGGfNArXcn/gc2LvH5gS0fhvjZwEcXv0HQmJdtZse09ai9hxSENcgdu+cYKhQl4/4dh+ me3jveEb2myyaPXtfCd3kGSoZfuLFpaPTE/i8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=xY/B68ngYserQW+Cgyj73shl6LUtcIWv0GhZinHh8jbQ1IHI8KX9zUQKOTfmVUIm4J baF+aMU+SIFPuBkRoNEtcKWBRthSBn+pTKPuIvWgDhehi1wJObqvHUFazSh1sx8e70fR mFEatUwFFGGqEXqi9vxrLuoTLRZ4hUlFs0B5U= Received: by 10.224.51.203 with SMTP id e11mr765258qag.213.1285739782970; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 22:56:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.236.85 with HTTP; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 22:56:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Aaron Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 22:56:01 -0700 Message-ID: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Disappearing available space with ZFS...what am I missing? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 05:56:23 -0000 I've created a ZFS pool with zpool create tank raidz ada0 ada1 ada2 ada3, and then I add some additional mountpoints (I think they're called) using zfs create tank/storage, etc. In zpool list, I see the pool with 3.62T available. With df -h, I see 2.4T available for tank, and tank/storage. When I first created tank, it had the 3.62T available as I expected. What am I missing? I do have compression set to gzip-9 on tank which gets inherited like I want, don't know if that would affect anything. --Aaron From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 06:13:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2D46106564A for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 06:13:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from b.smeelen@ose.nl) Received: from mail.ose.nl (mail.ose.nl [212.178.134.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 702968FC0C for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 06:13:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.ose.nl for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:13:53 +0200 Message-ID: <4CA2D921.2080402@ose.nl> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:13:53 +0200 From: Bas Smeelen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20100928162839.GA32198@thought.org> <7B0DAD9C-ED75-4188-9407-F86F44C94F47@cwis.biz> <19639A29-A22D-474B-8CD6-E62D2A4CCB15@cwis.biz> In-Reply-To: <19639A29-A22D-474B-8CD6-E62D2A4CCB15@cwis.biz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: what is from [sic (wrong)] with this picture? -- Answer: It's Ubuntu, not FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 06:13:57 -0000 =3E=3E You can=27t have a sending domain as thought=2Eorg if the =40 record= for thought=2Eorg doesn=27t exist=2C IIRC=2E =3E=3E =3E=3E Look to your DNS for the solution=2C IMNSHO=2E No MX for thought=2Eorg It did have a SOA a minute ago=2C but this is gone also =3E=3E=3E =3E=3E=3E By default=2C postfix was installed on my ubuntu desktop=2E I am= not =3E=3E=3E familiar with it=2E I would =3Dlike=3D it to be sending mail to= my server =3E=3E=3E without the =24HOST name instead of =24HOST=2E=24DOMAIN name=2E= I know there are =3E=3E=3E a bunch of us who use this kind of setup=3A FreeBSD for server th= ings and =3E=3E=3E some version of linux as a desktop=2E =3E=3E=3E =3E=3E=3E Really=2C this looks like a postfix blunder=2E How do I tell pos= tfix to =3E=3E=3E rewrite th e outgoing address without the hostname=3F =3E=3E=3E =20 This is a postfix question=2E Modify main=2Ecf and set myorigin I guess=3F http=3A//www=2Epostfix=2Eorg/documentation=2Ehtml DISCLAIMER=3A This e-mail is for the intended recipient=28s=29 only=2E Acce= ss=2C disclosure=2C copying=2C distribution or reliance on any of it by anyone else is prohibited=2E If yo= u have received it by mistake please let us know by reply and then delete it from your system= =2E From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 06:50:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86D831065670 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 06:50:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vyaaghrah-nix@yahoo.com) Received: from n6-vm0.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (n6-vm0.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [98.137.26.79]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 38B538FC14 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 06:50:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.137.27.132] by n6.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 29 Sep 2010 06:50:03 -0000 Received: from [67.195.9.98] by t4.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 29 Sep 2010 06:50:03 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp102.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 29 Sep 2010 06:50:03 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 423418.38453.bm@omp102.mail.gq1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 45019 invoked by uid 60001); 29 Sep 2010 06:50:03 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1285743003; bh=hoRXThhT+WNchkjJekASKwChOdvuFHtT288juZiLHJ0=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=JPbzm2iMbWaRtBDa+OTWAL0lVmPscg2lLKRUApUG2FCQlqr3fO80dv27qzYLmQ2yvxzOxZ6898TzGHsjO5T41X62A1STyUGh4ztrdlWUxQwGpEHkZ2cG/5/1SX5BhH8FsGl6sRr9haBSleqdIPT+TX99lugK332A9Euo8nL8IlQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:References:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=5AhXz4MBgZ3SlsWjyU0/tAXUd9aXg9E8psYoHiIyMOiaxQNdH+SXMUv9GhxBH+OLUnwgWfKqzYe4rXhQ3RbViDZXD2yn/uL3tVjHLQBALuCR3ShhpuFG3cayB/RuYy6S4enGmBLVnoI5BWSINauQdIAtd/y0BQGBWgEyeoPpTvo=; Message-ID: <246095.42115.qm@web113905.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: x2_IFQwVM1mfn9aAgpjWX5WvXuF.V709M4AZKcvqcu078xZ JAJ990flcLABGfQAA0lH0VaDUDZNRA7cljK.6ONdCT3BhqUpqYDpD9CyPygj jAYwDy6SZGB6U57jEHuvHLxwXuKqAkURHQpPHkx97eEyMliF9oXh_pXTs_Wt URHL9ryTqL2g6SyD2PaZmumlNWHOYC6DLfdgbkjC9US4H5HrtZgrFrTtIYoH iJhzuJStq_368MP1ywXIyEDtbpa7Mfl0CB.LNcBGggv4g2_PxSph7A4nkqEi suCn4ikJAmWjQM3kbRtY_gA80wuHUbQpf3JCNfaO9dYdF6RyQFlow_bpX5oL S_Pedao3xfm8uJ.L7K0MXwb3rq56B7A-- Received: from [116.197.178.83] by web113905.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 23:50:03 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/497 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 References: <800348.43799.qm@web113901.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 23:50:03 -0700 (PDT) From: vyaaghrah-nix@yahoo.com To: Adam Vande More In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cache Memory in top command X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 06:50:04 -0000 Hi Adam It gets me to this following explanation Cache: number of pages used for VM-level disk caching I am not sure what is VM-Level disk caching? Further it does not answer how this value is calculated for a system. Regards Abhijeet.C ________________________________ From: Adam Vande More To: vyaaghrah-nix@yahoo.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sent: Wed, September 29, 2010 8:20:43 AM Subject: Re: Cache Memory in top command On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 9:40 PM, wrote: Hi Everybody > >How is Cache memory in the following output calculated, on Free BSD system. > man 1 top -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 06:57:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F72A1065693 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 06:57:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from b.smeelen@ose.nl) Received: from mail.ose.nl (mail.ose.nl [212.178.134.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EF918FC19 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 06:57:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.ose.nl for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:57:09 +0200 Message-ID: <4CA2E345.7070006@ose.nl> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:57:09 +0200 From: Bas Smeelen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <800348.43799.qm@web113901.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <246095.42115.qm@web113905.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <246095.42115.qm@web113905.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Cache Memory in top command X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 06:57:11 -0000 On 09/29/2010 08=3A50 AM=2C vyaaghrah-nix=40yahoo=2Ecom wrote=3A =3E Hi Adam =3E =3E It gets me to this following explanation =3E =3E Cache=3A number of pages used for VM-level disk caching =3E =3E I am not sure what is VM-Level disk caching=3F =3E Further it does not answer how this value is calculated for a system=2E= =3E =3E =20 =3E=3E How is Cache memory in the following output calculated=2C on Free BS= D system=2E =3E=3E =3E=3E =20 =3E man 1 top =3E =3E =20 *Cache=3A* number of clean pages caching data that are available for imme= diate reallocation http=3A//www=2Efreebsd=2Eorg/cgi/man=2Ecgi=3Fquery=3Dtop=26sektion=3D1 =3Ch= ttp=3A//www=2Efreebsd=2Eorg/cgi/man=2Ecgi=3Fquery=3Dtop=26sektion=3D1=3E DISCLAIMER=3A This e-mail is for the intended recipient=28s=29 only=2E Acce= ss=2C disclosure=2C copying=2C distribution or reliance on any of it by anyone else is prohibited=2E If yo= u have received it by mistake please let us know by reply and then delete it from your system= =2E From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 09:12:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C598E1065675 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 09:12:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@pp.dyndns.biz) Received: from smtprelay-h32.telenor.se (smtprelay-h32.telenor.se [213.150.131.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D5B38FC18 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 09:12:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ipb1.telenor.se (ipb1.telenor.se [195.54.127.164]) by smtprelay-h32.telenor.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1472E8739 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:12:07 +0200 (CEST) X-SENDER-IP: [85.226.59.55] X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aiw8APufokxV4js3PGdsb2JhbACHb5orDAEBAQE1LcdUhUQEjTk X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,252,1283724000"; d="scan'208";a="136323387" Received: from c-373be255.107-1-64736c10.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se (HELO gatekeeper.pp.dyndns.biz) ([85.226.59.55]) by ipb1.telenor.se with ESMTP; 29 Sep 2010 11:12:07 +0200 Received: from [192.168.69.67] (phobos [192.168.69.67]) by gatekeeper.pp.dyndns.biz (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o8T9C5Bi075349; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:12:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@pp.dyndns.biz) Message-ID: <4CA302E5.9050004@pp.dyndns.biz> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:12:05 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Morgan_Wesstr=F6m?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100910 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Aaron References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Disappearing available space with ZFS...what am I missing? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 09:12:09 -0000 On 2010-09-29 07:56, Aaron wrote: > I've created a ZFS pool with zpool create tank raidz ada0 ada1 ada2 > ada3, and then I add some additional mountpoints (I think they're > called) using zfs create tank/storage, etc. In zpool list, I see the > pool with 3.62T available. With df -h, I see 2.4T available for tank, > and tank/storage. When I first created tank, it had the 3.62T > available as I expected. What am I missing? I do have compression set > to gzip-9 on tank which gets inherited like I want, don't know if that > would affect anything. > > --Aaron There's nothing wrong here that I can see, you just have to make a distinction between the zfs pool and the filesystems within the pool and I agree it can be confusing at first. The numbers suggest you are using 4 x 1TB (base 10 TB) drives? That equals 3.7TiB (base 2 TB) which is the unit zpool/zfs uses. This is the total amount of space available to the pool and includes all space on all drives in the pool. Nothing strange so far. Now, since you've told zpool to create filesystems within the pool using raidz, the filesystems will have 25% less space available since this space is used for parity data. So a filesystem using the whole pool will report having 3.7 * 0.75 = 2.7TiB available which is in agreement with your numbers. A raidz filesystem will always lose 1 disk worth of space and will never report that space as available to you since it will always be occupied with parity data. The pool on the other hand doesn't make a distinction, in this case anyway, between user data and parity data so zpool will always report what's actually unallocated on all your physical drives in the pool. For every GiB you allocate in the filesystem you will allocate 1.33GiB in the pool since that includes parity data. "zfs list" and "df -h" are your best friends to find out how much space is available for your files. Don't bother about "zpool list". Regards Morgan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 09:15:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC99106566C for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 09:15:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cyberleo@cyberleo.net) Received: from paka.cyberleo.net (paka.cyberleo.net [66.219.31.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7C0A8FC22 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 09:15:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.44.4] (dsl253-036-039.chi1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.253.36.39]) by paka.cyberleo.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ADE0228405; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 05:15:12 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4CA303A0.10102@cyberleo.net> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 04:15:12 -0500 From: CyberLeo Kitsana User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100911 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Aaron References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Disappearing available space with ZFS...what am I missing? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 09:15:14 -0000 On 09/29/2010 12:56 AM, Aaron wrote: > I've created a ZFS pool with zpool create tank raidz ada0 ada1 ada2 > ada3, and then I add some additional mountpoints (I think they're > called) using zfs create tank/storage, etc. In zpool list, I see the > pool with 3.62T available. With df -h, I see 2.4T available for tank, > and tank/storage. When I first created tank, it had the 3.62T > available as I expected. What am I missing? I do have compression set > to gzip-9 on tank which gets inherited like I want, don't know if that > would affect anything. zpool list shows raw space, and zfs list (and, to a certain extent, df) shows effective capacity. You've configured a raidz, which chews up extra space to store the redundant parity information; thus, for a 4-disk raidz, 1GB of stored data will use up about 1.33GB of raw space. Since effective capacity in ZFS is so variable, due to things like ditto blocks, raidz, compression, and (soon to be added) dedup, the numbers provided by df no longer make much sense. This blog posting can provide further elaboration as to why df doesn't work for advanced file storage: http://www.c0t0d0s0.org/archives/6168-df-considered-problematic.html -- Fuzzy love, -CyberLeo Technical Administrator CyberLeo.Net Webhosting http://www.CyberLeo.Net Furry Peace! - http://wwww.fur.com/peace/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 10:06:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 803D1106566B for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:06:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lhmwzy@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 396C98FC12 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:06:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk30 with SMTP id 30so807759qyk.13 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 03:06:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=/LBHsGfCbUr1gX7Vu4l2qM98j4fhTLZpAWmCz9A+4eU=; b=KBLqGJl+KFO87Up648Wi/2v6DeUm2Fnl2No4xFMGs47/fgAi6G9SFWRqJ0Dj9nU/0h U3Z4pqmfjABIQKC2VmyVWiVf+LsqShw+u62VkNAfG9KGeFbDXkPVzM61sAEkKzYXa8xH X+bUzdkz5pCoLf5Egl+hqX63A/QNAQFTV26jY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=JgTw/6w5kSRRhx/KxQw/uC54MgVNKUrVzFDYDWglknF3pLBp5zDgakayOIPw8Q8afq T04LUVSDn7+1xuEipCGBx6OTSbF/TSTcCTXX6RikIKCfW3Ds3b02/A7cmFoECh1FJQAS 0KCQgggmun30jVRMVJRAOmKS8dcqw9EBWgDxE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.37.11 with SMTP id v11mr911194qad.374.1285753387868; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 02:43:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.95.81 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 02:43:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:43:07 +0800 Message-ID: From: lhmwzy To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: sed problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:06:51 -0000 #%sed -e '/GROUP/{/Test/! d}' test sed: 1: "/GROUP/{/Test/! d} ": extra characters at the end of d command also have error. the system: #uname -a FreeBSD bxzxfreebsd.slof.com 7.2-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p5 #1: Fri Dec 4 17:58:13 CST 2009 lhm@bxzxfreebsd.slof.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/lhmwzy amd64 2010/9/29 lhmwzy : > I have a txt file named test: > > USER Added by ftpadmin > GENERAL 0,0 120 204800 0 > LOGINS 1 0 -1 -1 > TIMEFRAME 0 0 > FLAGS 3 > TAGLINE lanshu4385 > DIR / > ADDED 1284812614 ftpadmin > EXPIRES 0 > CREDITS 15000 > RATIO 0 > ALLUP 0 0 0 > ALLDN 0 0 0 > WKUP 0 0 0 > WKDN 0 0 0 > DAYUP 0 0 0 > DAYDN 0 0 0 > MONTHUP 0 0 0 > MONTHDN 0 0 0 > NUKE 0 0 0 > TIME 0 1284812614 0 0 > GROUP Teest 0 > GROUP eest 0 > GROUP dTeest 0 > GROUP tTeest 0 > GROUP Test 0 > IP *@* > > when I use the follow command: > > #sed -e '/GROUP/{/Test/}! d' test > then output error: > > sed: 1: "/GROUP/{/Test/}! d > ": command } expects up to 0 address(es), found 1 > > But this command under linux is OK,how can I do? > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 10:07:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85CF41065679 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:07:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lhmwzy@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44B378FC12 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:07:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk7 with SMTP id 7so1032362qyk.13 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 03:07:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=YLfDoYOx2H/KZSEEH3vf0vUn2yp1jvVEl3L0ok6e3WA=; b=aQjopcm3nPY7ZiimV2Z/yECevH/e1/3kNz57/4UYBBQS+AFLTf9dBpHs+oPn8avG4n B2fBtA92toT8c4waVn2xCV8c/NQiImD8FJNyrako64UsVXbwbeacZ945Rn1yIxFg4wJQ +8+/fyySVMyR8Eh8WZuN3JI+am7LCgSI2+8uI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=XXH/Q3gRQxv2MKRRnWxCpykr0wghGfpSGLaaY0GXJOmenZrHnkbZnRKIOkGZ5lTxCu CftrsmF8oDJ1hWnHQD5FiQW38VExiRcJ791+fH19bWP88fPXWs3YTR8IouHXuLht+J8h Tb4+ETXpQGPGPYdMArCVFiN4o90P6aYU/eA+c= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.184.68 with SMTP id cj4mr1014097qcb.48.1285753283700; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 02:41:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.95.81 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 02:41:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:41:23 +0800 Message-ID: From: lhmwzy To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: sed problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:07:27 -0000 I have a txt file named test: USER Added by ftpadmin GENERAL 0,0 120 204800 0 LOGINS 1 0 -1 -1 TIMEFRAME 0 0 FLAGS 3 TAGLINE lanshu4385 DIR / ADDED 1284812614 ftpadmin EXPIRES 0 CREDITS 15000 RATIO 0 ALLUP 0 0 0 ALLDN 0 0 0 WKUP 0 0 0 WKDN 0 0 0 DAYUP 0 0 0 DAYDN 0 0 0 MONTHUP 0 0 0 MONTHDN 0 0 0 NUKE 0 0 0 TIME 0 1284812614 0 0 GROUP Teest 0 GROUP eest 0 GROUP dTeest 0 GROUP tTeest 0 GROUP Test 0 IP *@* when I use the follow command: #sed -e '/GROUP/{/Test/}! d' test then output error: sed: 1: "/GROUP/{/Test/}! d ": command } expects up to 0 address(es), found 1 But this command under linux is OK,how can I do? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 10:14:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0CF0106564A for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:14:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F46F8FC15 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:14:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwd6 with SMTP id 6so491314qwd.13 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 03:14:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=3eL+j6p/EYjeUN1y1WRxlqcBQWNYivr+v2J1mffgG9w=; b=V1RKfljskhCMYaQeh4wov+7AqWCCBfp7PNt23y7h2qPaApMGWBavai1Gc+5Z9CTLjS 2qyN4Fv0q09ZgUpHDEI9uHO/vJVTjRlxTC144nPEiTIm25BNuLLdpZr/hfxRy0TUVglP g/6hGxh7IkX81QL6kohvy3iSKTfQ7L1f+NxF8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=iz0S0oCma4UuCPt/guBK/dYlpRVmaA3hnCwsKXf+3V4jflxLXToq2/F97KaPNVkd2/ SNbxXiRGJH1pQRooLWdNgAITQpGlSvZQpG5VwuUcTVUm+NyPSHZJMZg797yxTV6E5DbD D+he8VN3+Vmi87MwjU2UTvln2sKSrQ5FkgYTc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.102.146 with SMTP id g18mr996857qao.200.1285755266532; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 03:14:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.215.209 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 03:14:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4CA302E5.9050004@pp.dyndns.biz> References: <4CA302E5.9050004@pp.dyndns.biz> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:14:26 +0100 Message-ID: From: krad To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Morgan_Wesstr=F6m?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Aaron Subject: Re: Disappearing available space with ZFS...what am I missing? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:14:27 -0000 On 29 September 2010 10:12, Morgan Wesstr=F6m wrote: > On 2010-09-29 07:56, Aaron wrote: > >> I've created a ZFS pool with zpool create tank raidz ada0 ada1 ada2 >> ada3, and then I add some additional mountpoints (I think they're >> called) using zfs create tank/storage, etc. In zpool list, I see the >> pool with 3.62T available. With df -h, I see 2.4T available for tank, >> and tank/storage. When I first created tank, it had the 3.62T >> available as I expected. What am I missing? I do have compression set >> to gzip-9 on tank which gets inherited like I want, don't know if that >> would affect anything. >> >> --Aaron >> > > There's nothing wrong here that I can see, you just have to make a > distinction between the zfs pool and the filesystems within the pool and = I > agree it can be confusing at first. > > The numbers suggest you are using 4 x 1TB (base 10 TB) drives? That equal= s > 3.7TiB (base 2 TB) which is the unit zpool/zfs uses. This is the total > amount of space available to the pool and includes all space on all drive= s > in the pool. Nothing strange so far. > > Now, since you've told zpool to create filesystems within the pool using > raidz, the filesystems will have 25% less space available since this spac= e > is used for parity data. So a filesystem using the whole pool will report > having 3.7 * 0.75 =3D 2.7TiB available which is in agreement with your > numbers. A raidz filesystem will always lose 1 disk worth of space and wi= ll > never report that space as available to you since it will always be occup= ied > with parity data. > > The pool on the other hand doesn't make a distinction, in this case anywa= y, > between user data and parity data so zpool will always report what's > actually unallocated on all your physical drives in the pool. For every G= iB > you allocate in the filesystem you will allocate 1.33GiB in the pool sinc= e > that includes parity data. "zfs list" and "df -h" are your best friends t= o > find out how much space is available for your files. Don't bother about > "zpool list". > > Regards > Morgan > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > It gets even more hairy when you start adding in reservsions, quotas, and compression. Slap dedup on top of that and you get magically growing fs according to df 8) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 10:23:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 402031065672 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:23:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matrix@itlegion.ru) Received: from corpmail.itlegion.ru (corpmail.itlegion.ru [84.21.226.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 781558FC12 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:23:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 93716 invoked from network); 29 Sep 2010 13:56:23 +0400 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.0.12?) (192.168.0.12) by 84.21.226.211 with SMTP; 29 Sep 2010 13:56:23 +0400 Message-ID: <4CA30D14.7000605@itlegion.ru> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:55:32 +0400 From: Artem Kuchin Organization: IT Legion User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.0; ru; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------030701070209070907030703" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Kernel Trap 9 and freeze X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:23:09 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030701070209070907030703 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hello! Just upgraded the world and kernel to the latest 8.1-stable via cvs yesterday. Now, at 6 in the morning got kernel trap 9 (screenshot is attached). The worst part is that it did not reboot. It just froze after "stopping other cpus". This is amd64 architecture. Kernel config is attached too. The question is how i can make the reboot in such case more reliable? Any kernel options which would more reliable send the server into reboot? Maybe some other comments on what happened and possible why? Artem --------------030701070209070907030703 Content-Type: text/plain; name="FINIZDAT" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="FINIZDAT" cpu HAMMER ident FINIZDAT makeoptions DEBUG=-g # Build kernel with gdb(1) debug symbols options SCHED_ULE # ULE scheduler options PREEMPTION # Enable kernel thread preemption options INET # InterNETworking options INET6 # IPv6 communications protocols options SCTP # Stream Control Transmission Protocol options FFS # Berkeley Fast Filesystem options SOFTUPDATES # Enable FFS soft updates support options UFS_ACL # Support for access control lists options UFS_DIRHASH # Improve performance on big directories options UFS_GJOURNAL # Enable gjournal-based UFS journaling options MD_ROOT # MD is a potential root device options NFSCLIENT # Network Filesystem Client options NFSSERVER # Network Filesystem Server options NFSLOCKD # Network Lock Manager options NFS_ROOT # NFS usable as /, requires NFSCLIENT options MSDOSFS # MSDOS Filesystem options CD9660 # ISO 9660 Filesystem options PROCFS # Process filesystem (requires PSEUDOFS) options PSEUDOFS # Pseudo-filesystem framework options GEOM_PART_GPT # GUID Partition Tables. options GEOM_LABEL # Provides labelization options COMPAT_43TTY # BSD 4.3 TTY compat (sgtty) options COMPAT_FREEBSD32 # Compatible with i386 binaries options SCSI_DELAY=5000 # Delay (in ms) before probing SCSI options KTRACE # ktrace(1) support options STACK # stack(9) support options SYSVSHM # SYSV-style shared memory options SYSVMSG # SYSV-style message queues options SYSVSEM # SYSV-style semaphores options P1003_1B_SEMAPHORES # POSIX-style semaphores options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING # POSIX P1003_1B real-time extensions options PRINTF_BUFR_SIZE=128 # Prevent printf output being interspersed. options KBD_INSTALL_CDEV # install a CDEV entry in /dev options HWPMC_HOOKS # Necessary kernel hooks for hwpmc(4) options AUDIT # Security event auditing options MAC # TrustedBSD MAC Framework options FLOWTABLE # per-cpu routing cache #options KDTRACE_FRAME # Ensure frames are compiled in #options KDTRACE_HOOKS # Kernel DTrace hooks options INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE # Include this file in kernel # Make an SMP-capable kernel by default options SMP # Symmetric MultiProcessor Kernel # CPU frequency control device cpufreq # Bus support. device acpi device pci # Floppy drives device fdc # ATA and ATAPI devices device ata device atadisk # ATA disk drives device ataraid # ATA RAID drives device atapicd # ATAPI CDROM drives device atapifd # ATAPI floppy drives device atapist # ATAPI tape drives options ATA_STATIC_ID # Static device numbering # SCSI Controllers device ahc # AHA2940 and onboard AIC7xxx devices options AHC_REG_PRETTY_PRINT # Print register bitfields in debug # output. Adds ~128k to driver. device ahd # AHA39320/29320 and onboard AIC79xx devices options AHD_REG_PRETTY_PRINT # Print register bitfields in debug # output. Adds ~215k to driver. device amd # AMD 53C974 (Tekram DC-390(T)) device hptiop # Highpoint RocketRaid 3xxx series device isp # Qlogic family #device ispfw # Firmware for QLogic HBAs- normally a module device mpt # LSI-Logic MPT-Fusion #device ncr # NCR/Symbios Logic device sym # NCR/Symbios Logic (newer chipsets + those of `ncr') device trm # Tekram DC395U/UW/F DC315U adapters device adv # Advansys SCSI adapters device adw # Advansys wide SCSI adapters device aic # Adaptec 15[012]x SCSI adapters, AIC-6[23]60. device bt # Buslogic/Mylex MultiMaster SCSI adapters # SCSI peripherals device scbus # SCSI bus (required for SCSI) device ch # SCSI media changers device da # Direct Access (disks) device sa # Sequential Access (tape etc) device cd # CD device pass # Passthrough device (direct SCSI access) device ses # SCSI Environmental Services (and SAF-TE) # RAID controllers interfaced to the SCSI subsystem device amr # AMI MegaRAID device arcmsr # Areca SATA II RAID #XXX it is not 64-bit clean, -scottl #device asr # DPT SmartRAID V, VI and Adaptec SCSI RAID device ciss # Compaq Smart RAID 5* device dpt # DPT Smartcache III, IV - See NOTES for options device hptmv # Highpoint RocketRAID 182x device hptrr # Highpoint RocketRAID 17xx, 22xx, 23xx, 25xx device iir # Intel Integrated RAID device ips # IBM (Adaptec) ServeRAID device mly # Mylex AcceleRAID/eXtremeRAID device twa # 3ware 9000 series PATA/SATA RAID # RAID controllers device aac # Adaptec FSA RAID device aacp # SCSI passthrough for aac (requires CAM) device ida # Compaq Smart RAID device mfi # LSI MegaRAID SAS device mlx # Mylex DAC960 family #XXX pointer/int warnings #device pst # Promise Supertrak SX6000 device twe # 3ware ATA RAID # atkbdc0 controls both the keyboard and the PS/2 mouse device atkbdc # AT keyboard controller device atkbd # AT keyboard device psm # PS/2 mouse device kbdmux # keyboard multiplexer device vga # VGA video card driver device splash # Splash screen and screen saver support # syscons is the default console driver, resembling an SCO console device sc device agp # support several AGP chipsets # PCCARD (PCMCIA) support # PCMCIA and cardbus bridge support device cbb # cardbus (yenta) bridge device pccard # PC Card (16-bit) bus device cardbus # CardBus (32-bit) bus # Serial (COM) ports device uart # Generic UART driver # Parallel port device ppc device ppbus # Parallel port bus (required) device lpt # Printer device plip # TCP/IP over parallel device ppi # Parallel port interface device #device vpo # Requires scbus and da # If you've got a "dumb" serial or parallel PCI card that is # supported by the puc(4) glue driver, uncomment the following # line to enable it (connects to sio, uart and/or ppc drivers): #device puc # PCI Ethernet NICs. device de # DEC/Intel DC21x4x (``Tulip'') device em # Intel PRO/1000 Gigabit Ethernet Family device igb # Intel PRO/1000 PCIE Server Gigabit Family device ixgbe # Intel PRO/10GbE PCIE Ethernet Family device le # AMD Am7900 LANCE and Am79C9xx PCnet device ti # Alteon Networks Tigon I/II gigabit Ethernet device txp # 3Com 3cR990 (``Typhoon'') device vx # 3Com 3c590, 3c595 (``Vortex'') # PCI Ethernet NICs that use the common MII bus controller code. # NOTE: Be sure to keep the 'device miibus' line in order to use these NICs! device miibus # MII bus support device ae # Attansic/Atheros L2 FastEthernet device age # Attansic/Atheros L1 Gigabit Ethernet device alc # Atheros AR8131/AR8132 Ethernet device ale # Atheros AR8121/AR8113/AR8114 Ethernet device bce # Broadcom BCM5706/BCM5708 Gigabit Ethernet device bfe # Broadcom BCM440x 10/100 Ethernet device bge # Broadcom BCM570xx Gigabit Ethernet device dc # DEC/Intel 21143 and various workalikes device et # Agere ET1310 10/100/Gigabit Ethernet device fxp # Intel EtherExpress PRO/100B (82557, 82558) device jme # JMicron JMC250 Gigabit/JMC260 Fast Ethernet device lge # Level 1 LXT1001 gigabit Ethernet device msk # Marvell/SysKonnect Yukon II Gigabit Ethernet device nfe # nVidia nForce MCP on-board Ethernet device nge # NatSemi DP83820 gigabit Ethernet #device nve # nVidia nForce MCP on-board Ethernet Networking device pcn # AMD Am79C97x PCI 10/100 (precedence over 'le') device re # RealTek 8139C+/8169/8169S/8110S device rl # RealTek 8129/8139 device sf # Adaptec AIC-6915 (``Starfire'') device sge # Silicon Integrated Systems SiS190/191 device sis # Silicon Integrated Systems SiS 900/SiS 7016 device sk # SysKonnect SK-984x & SK-982x gigabit Ethernet device ste # Sundance ST201 (D-Link DFE-550TX) device stge # Sundance/Tamarack TC9021 gigabit Ethernet device tl # Texas Instruments ThunderLAN device tx # SMC EtherPower II (83c170 ``EPIC'') device vge # VIA VT612x gigabit Ethernet device vr # VIA Rhine, Rhine II device wb # Winbond W89C840F device xl # 3Com 3c90x (``Boomerang'', ``Cyclone'') # ISA Ethernet NICs. pccard NICs included. device cs # Crystal Semiconductor CS89x0 NIC # 'device ed' requires 'device miibus' device ed # NE[12]000, SMC Ultra, 3c503, DS8390 cards device ex # Intel EtherExpress Pro/10 and Pro/10+ device ep # Etherlink III based cards device fe # Fujitsu MB8696x based cards device sn # SMC's 9000 series of Ethernet chips device xe # Xircom pccard Ethernet # Wireless NIC cards device wlan # 802.11 support options IEEE80211_DEBUG # enable debug msgs options IEEE80211_AMPDU_AGE # age frames in AMPDU reorder q's options IEEE80211_SUPPORT_MESH # enable 802.11s draft support device wlan_wep # 802.11 WEP support device wlan_ccmp # 802.11 CCMP support device wlan_tkip # 802.11 TKIP support device wlan_amrr # AMRR transmit rate control algorithm device an # Aironet 4500/4800 802.11 wireless NICs. device ath # Atheros pci/cardbus NIC's device ath_hal # pci/cardbus chip support options AH_SUPPORT_AR5416 # enable AR5416 tx/rx descriptors device ath_rate_sample # SampleRate tx rate control for ath device ral # Ralink Technology RT2500 wireless NICs. device wi # WaveLAN/Intersil/Symbol 802.11 wireless NICs. # Pseudo devices. device loop # Network loopback device random # Entropy device device ether # Ethernet support device vlan # 802.1Q VLAN support device tun # Packet tunnel. device pty # BSD-style compatibility pseudo ttys device md # Memory "disks" device gif # IPv6 and IPv4 tunneling device faith # IPv6-to-IPv4 relaying (translation) device firmware # firmware assist module # The `bpf' device enables the Berkeley Packet Filter. # Be aware of the administrative consequences of enabling this! # Note that 'bpf' is required for DHCP. device bpf # Berkeley packet filter # USB support options USB_DEBUG # enable debug msgs device uhci # UHCI PCI->USB interface device ohci # OHCI PCI->USB interface device ehci # EHCI PCI->USB interface (USB 2.0) device usb # USB Bus (required) #device udbp # USB Double Bulk Pipe devices device uhid # "Human Interface Devices" device ukbd # Keyboard device ulpt # Printer device umass # Disks/Mass storage - Requires scbus and da device ums # Mouse device urio # Diamond Rio 500 MP3 player # USB Serial devices device uark # Technologies ARK3116 based serial adapters device ubsa # Belkin F5U103 and compatible serial adapters device uftdi # For FTDI usb serial adapters device uipaq # Some WinCE based devices device uplcom # Prolific PL-2303 serial adapters device uslcom # SI Labs CP2101/CP2102 serial adapters device uvisor # Visor and Palm devices device uvscom # USB serial support for DDI pocket's PHS # USB Ethernet, requires miibus device aue # ADMtek USB Ethernet device axe # ASIX Electronics USB Ethernet device cdce # Generic USB over Ethernet device cue # CATC USB Ethernet device kue # Kawasaki LSI USB Ethernet device rue # RealTek RTL8150 USB Ethernet device udav # Davicom DM9601E USB # USB Wireless device rum # Ralink Technology RT2501USB wireless NICs device uath # Atheros AR5523 wireless NICs device ural # Ralink Technology RT2500USB wireless NICs device zyd # ZyDAS zb1211/zb1211b wireless NICs # FireWire support device firewire # FireWire bus code #device sbp # SCSI over FireWire (Requires scbus and da) device fwe # Ethernet over FireWire (non-standard!) device fwip # IP over FireWire (RFC 2734,3146) device dcons # Dumb console driver device dcons_crom # Configuration ROM for dcons options IPFIREWALL options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT=10000 options IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT options IPDIVERT options DUMMYNET --------------030701070209070907030703-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 10:51:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB3F6106564A for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:51:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 780C68FC12 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:51:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsd.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.59] helo=ncs.bris.ac.uk) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P0uFi-0003t4-G7; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:51:10 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncs.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1P0uFi-00003p-9M; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:51:10 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o8TApAZq004124; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:51:10 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk) Received: from localhost (mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id o8TAp9Dg004112; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:51:09 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:51:09 +0100 (BST) From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Michel Talon In-Reply-To: <20100928135414.GA17159@lpthe.jussieu.fr> Message-ID: References: <20100928135414.GA17159@lpthe.jussieu.fr> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ld(1) cannot find entry symbol _start; X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:51:11 -0000 On Tue, 28 Sep 2010, Michel Talon wrote: > Paul B Mahol said: > On 9/28/10, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >>> I'm trying to learn the very basics of the >>> compile - assemble - link process on FreeBSD. >>> Please don't shoot me. >> .... >>> Then I try to link the object file into >>> an executable: >>> >>> % ld tmp.o >> >> You are missing something in above command. >> > > More precisely, if you run gcc -v on a C file you get someting like: > /usr/bin/ld --eh-frame-hdr -V -dynamic-linker /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 > /usr/lib/crt1.o /usr/lib/crti.o /usr/lib/crtbegin.o -L/usr/lib > -L/usr/lib /var/tmp//cco5EINk.o -lgcc --as-needed -lgcc_s --no-as-needed > -lc -lgcc --as-needed -lgcc_s --no-as-needed /usr/lib/crtend.o > /usr/lib/crtn.o > > > where the object file produced by compilation and assembling is > /var/tmp//cco5EINk.o > > That is adds several other object files to your own in order to get > an executable. > > In particular the start symbol, at which execution begins is in > /usr/lib/crt1.o > > as you can see from > niobe% nm /usr/lib/crt1.o > w _DYNAMIC > 00000000 D __progname > U _fini > U _init > U _init_tls > 00000000 T _start > 00000020 t _start1 > 00000000 r abitag > U atexit > 00000004 C environ > U exit > U main > which shows that _start is defined here, (but not e.g. _init). On the > other hand the function main() which is defined in your program is > referred to but undefined here. thank you. Where can I read more on what each file is for: % ls -al /usr/lib/crt* -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 2552 Sep 15 13:52 /usr/lib/crt1.o -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 4656 Sep 15 13:53 /usr/lib/crtbegin.o -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 4936 Sep 15 13:53 /usr/lib/crtbeginS.o -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 4656 Sep 15 13:53 /usr/lib/crtbeginT.o -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 3648 Sep 15 13:53 /usr/lib/crtend.o -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 3648 Sep 15 13:53 /usr/lib/crtendS.o -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1928 Sep 15 13:52 /usr/lib/crti.o -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1087 Sep 15 13:52 /usr/lib/crtn.o The sources for these files are in asm, so would be good to read a more accessible introduction. Also, it seems only crt1, crti and crtn are provided by FreeBSD itself (/usr/src/lib/csu/ia64), crtbegin and crtend are under /usr/src/contrib/gcc/config/ia64/, and sources for *S.o and *T.o I can't find at all. So which of these are specific to GCC on FreeBSD, and which aren't? For example if I use g95 compiler instead of gfortran45, will the linker still need all above object files? many thanks anton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 11:20:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABB421065670 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:20:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from tensor.gdynia.pl (tensor.gdynia.pl [89.206.35.72]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B6DB8FC13 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:20:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: Received: from 127.0.0.1 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.3/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o8TB7QfI096987; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:07:26 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id o8TB7QBm096984; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:07:26 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:07:26 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: William Lang In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Booting up FreeBSD 8.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:20:05 -0000 > I have just installed FreeBSD 8.0 and after I login it stops at $ like its > waiting for me to put some type of information in or something. So what do I > put after the dollar sign??? it means you have to sent some dollars to FreeBSD fundation. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 11:30:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA302106566B for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:30:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 759598FC12 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:30:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [193.31.11.193] (helo=current.Sisis.de) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P0urW-00059V-Ff for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:30:15 +0200 Received: from current.Sisis.de (current [127.0.0.1]) by current.Sisis.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o8TBUEqx003730 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:30:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by current.Sisis.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id o8TBUDkZ003729 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:30:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: current.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:30:13 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100929113013.GA3665@current.Sisis.de> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Originating-IP: 193.31.11.193 Subject: Re: Booting up FreeBSD 8.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:30:17 -0000 El día Wednesday, September 29, 2010 a las 01:07:26PM +0200, Wojciech Puchar escribió: > > I have just installed FreeBSD 8.0 and after I login it stops at $ like its > > waiting for me to put some type of information in or something. So what do I > > put after the dollar sign??? > > it means you have to sent some dollars to FreeBSD fundation. The OP could key in exactly this chars: PS1=RTFM and then press a few times Return to see the efect. He/She could also read http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/index.html to see where to go now from here. HIH matthias -- Matthias Apitz t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 11:43:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01967106566B for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:43:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com [81.103.221.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92A978FC15 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:43:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from know-smtpout-4.server.virginmedia.net ([62.254.123.1]) by mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (InterMail vM.7.08.04.00 201-2186-134-20080326) with ESMTP id <20100929114233.IIIB3266.mtaout01-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@know-smtpout-4.server.virginmedia.net>; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:42:33 +0100 Received: from [82.31.11.222] (helo=unknown) by know-smtpout-4.server.virginmedia.net with esmtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1P0v3Q-0007EW-Sh; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:42:33 +0100 Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:42:30 +0100 From: Bruce Cran To: Bas Smeelen Message-ID: <20100929124230.00004796@unknown> In-Reply-To: <4CA2E345.7070006@ose.nl> References: <800348.43799.qm@web113901.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <246095.42115.qm@web113905.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4CA2E345.7070006@ose.nl> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i586-pc-mingw32msvc) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=DhNl2YeytwJssBBGe49HJX82LNDFEEVkpVB34RXKaPo= c=1 sm=0 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=7PPxaeniefWQyEticZEA:9 a=07xOSOc2jIrKAArpgL8A:7 a=tWPIFGA6_MxsMBzqwp6xGSoX07cA:4 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=bQXN4pLBKcwA:10 a=HpAAvcLHHh0Zw7uRqdWCyQ==:117 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, vyaaghrah-nix@yahoo.com Subject: Re: Cache Memory in top command X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:43:05 -0000 On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:57:09 +0200 Bas Smeelen wrote: > *Cache:* number of clean pages caching data that are available for > immediate reallocation > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=top&sektion=1 > I believe the "Cache" value is almost totally unrelated to the amount of memory used for caching: FreeBSD has a unified buffer cache so any memory is available for use as cache. Unlike Linux, you can't look at the line in 'top' to see how much memory is being used for buffers and cache. You can find more information about the VM architecture at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/arch-handbook/vm.html . -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 12:16:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D6F6106566C for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:16:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@hotmail.com) Received: from blu0-omc4-s21.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc4-s21.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.160]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B448FC12 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:16:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU0-SMTP201 ([65.55.111.137]) by blu0-omc4-s21.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 29 Sep 2010 05:16:50 -0700 X-Originating-IP: [71.77.39.64] X-Originating-Email: [carmel_ny@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ([71.77.39.64]) by BLU0-SMTP201.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 29 Sep 2010 05:16:49 -0700 Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: carmel_ny@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 464C6E54867 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:16:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:16:47 -0400 From: Carmel To: FreeBSD Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Face: 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 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 29 Sep 2010 12:16:49.0321 (UTC) FILETIME=[312F4990:01CB5FD0] Subject: IPFW firewall and TCP ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:16:51 -0000 While perusing my Apache httpd-error.log, I noticed a large number of attempts to access my phpmyadmin directory, as well as a few less know others. Most of these probes originated from China. Since I have no legitimate business dealing with that region, I decided to create a table in my IPFW firewall to block them. This is an example: ## IPFW Firewall Rules # Set rules command prefix cmd="ipfw -q add" # public interface name of NIC facing the public Internet pif="nfe0" # Lets start by listing known bad IP addresses and blocking them. We # will put them into a table for easier handling. ipfw -q table 1 add 60.0.0.0/8 ipfw -q table 1 add 61.0.0.0/8 $cmd set 1 deny log all from table\(1\) to any in via $pif The above is the first entry in my "rules" file. I know that IPFW is working since I have blocked other ports for other services and it has worked correctly. The problem is that these IPs are not being blocked. I continue to see them listed in the httpd-error.log. I have rebooted my machine and therefore am quite certain that these rules are being loaded. The problem is that I probably do not understand how to properly block an IP or range of IPs from accessing my web server correctly. I would really appreciate any assistance. -- Carmel ✌ carmel_ny@hotmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 12:41:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A52E21065670 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:41:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from b.smeelen@ose.nl) Received: from mail.ose.nl (mail.ose.nl [212.178.134.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4454E8FC12 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:41:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.ose.nl for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:41:16 +0200 Message-ID: <4CA333EC.40704@ose.nl> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:41:16 +0200 From: Bas Smeelen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <800348.43799.qm@web113901.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <246095.42115.qm@web113905.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4CA2E345.7070006@ose.nl> <20100929124230.00004796@unknown> In-Reply-To: <20100929124230.00004796@unknown> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Cache Memory in top command X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:41:19 -0000 On 09/29/2010 01=3A42 PM=2C Bruce Cran wrote=3A =3E On Wed=2C 29 Sep 2010 08=3A57=3A09 +0200 =3E Bas Smeelen =3Cb=2Esmeelen=40ose=2Enl=3E wrote=3A =3E =3E =20 =3E=3E *Cache=3A* number of clean pages caching data that are available fo= r =3E=3E immediate reallocation =3E=3E http=3A//www=2Efreebsd=2Eorg/cgi/man=2Ecgi=3Fquery=3Dtop=26sektion= =3D1 =3E=3E =3Chttp=3A//www=2Efreebsd=2Eorg/cgi/man=2Ecgi=3Fquery=3Dtop=26sektio= n=3D1=3E =3E=3E =20 =3E I believe the =22Cache=22 value is almost totally unrelated to the =3E amount of memory used for caching=3A FreeBSD has a unified buffer cache= =3E so any memory is available for use as cache=2E Unlike Linux=2C you can= =27t =3E look at the line in =27top=27 to see how much memory is being used for= =3E buffers and cache=2E =3E =3E You can find more information about the VM architecture at =3E http=3A//www=2Efreebsd=2Eorg/doc/en/books/arch-handbook/vm=2Ehtml =2E= =3E =3E =20 The way I understand it=3A The amount of cached file data pages is included in the Wired value The amount of free cache pages that can immediatly can be re-used for caching is the Cache value The Buf value is the numbder of pages used for BIO-level disk caching I think that the value of Inactive also includes some kind of application data cache So as you also state=2C unlike linux there is no way of determining the amount of memory used for *all caching* with top For more info of basic design decisions I think this is a good resource also=3A http=3A//docs=2Efreebsd=2Eorg/44doc/ DISCLAIMER=3A This e-mail is for the intended recipient=28s=29 only=2E Acce= ss=2C disclosure=2C copying=2C distribution or reliance on any of it by anyone else is prohibited=2E If yo= u have received it by mistake please let us know by reply and then delete it from your system= =2E From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 12:51:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E19E0106564A for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:51:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from b.smeelen@ose.nl) Received: from mail.ose.nl (mail.ose.nl [212.178.134.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53B0B8FC16 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:51:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.ose.nl for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:51:24 +0200 Message-ID: <4CA3364C.7000700@ose.nl> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:51:24 +0200 From: Bas Smeelen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: IPFW firewall and TCP ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:51:26 -0000 On 09/29/2010 02=3A16 PM=2C Carmel wrote=3A =3E While perusing my Apache httpd-error=2Elog=2C I noticed a large number= of =3E attempts to access my phpmyadmin directory=2C as well as a few less kno= w =3E others=2E Most of these probes originated from China=2E Since I have no= =3E legitimate business dealing with that region=2C I decided to create a= =3E table in my IPFW firewall to block them=2E This is an example=3A =3E =3E =3E =23=23 IPFW Firewall Rules =3E =3E =23 Set rules command prefix =3E cmd=3D=22ipfw -q add=22 =3E =3E =23 public interface name of NIC facing the public Internet =3E pif=3D=22nfe0=22 =20 =3E =3E =23 Lets start by listing known bad IP addresses and blocking them=2E W= e =3E =23 will put them into a table for easier handling=2E =3E =3E ipfw -q table 1 add 60=2E0=2E0=2E0/8 =3E ipfw -q table 1 add 61=2E0=2E0=2E0/8 =3E =3E =24cmd set 1 deny log all from table=5C=281=5C=29 to any in via =24pif= =3E =3E The above is the first entry in my =22rules=22 file=2E I know that IPFW= is =3E working since I have blocked other ports for other services and it has= =3E worked correctly=2E =3E =3E The problem is that these IPs are not being blocked=2E I continue to se= e =3E them listed in the httpd-error=2Elog=2E I have rebooted my machine and= =3E therefore am quite certain that these rules are being loaded=2E =3E =3E The problem is that I probably do not understand how to properly block= =3E an IP or range of IPs from accessing my web server correctly=2E I would= =3E really appreciate any assistance=2E =3E =3E =20 There is an archived thread on the freebsd forums http=3A//forums=2Efreebsd=2Eorg/archive/index=2Ephp/t-10181=2Ehtml And a long list of ranges on http=3A//www=2Eparkansky=2Ecom/china=2Ehtm wit= h uses apaches features to block these address ranges I see this also on our webservers=2C but it doesn=27t bother those servers= or me Maybe try blocken those ranges first with a rule for each to get the right subnets and put them in a table afterwards=3F DISCLAIMER=3A This e-mail is for the intended recipient=28s=29 only=2E Acce= ss=2C disclosure=2C copying=2C distribution or reliance on any of it by anyone else is prohibited=2E If yo= u have received it by mistake please let us know by reply and then delete it from your system= =2E From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 12:52:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4961106566C for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:52:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from albinv4616@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 705838FC19 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:52:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwb17 with SMTP id 17so938061wwb.31 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 05:52:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=2W/yST2vI4elhGtmmA8ybn6uRDfFz/qV16VxAdEG6V0=; b=LgO+BlIwfgQNvjzTD7DgluCseOr9bwvdmsBnBEl82WZ/HCPQegRyZjuO3OFVJEG2IM WrpJEwB6Lt4PuW833dmPgv76KIq/soDd1ZQK24x9KvvczbzQOPoA5/o0K0d6tuxjDiUG pV8Ga67zSkVQVSa24mFQcOlyhYt76s/cJ0clE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=N4DK7SQgsvw8hFSg3Omb4u/ZM3kXLlQvcZQXScd2I2ZzZDADjNWfWk855Isk1+muXR c+a0KVSp37oSsLlkaizcq5gu9bYY1h8/ILiEyyEE1T+B78CHcceeucqPQuWCQeKPfROI tLPo9Nr59I+xgSVReR9fWKKohyfsUDOh2ywn4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.71.85 with SMTP id q63mr1366492wed.53.1285764756843; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 05:52:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.233.148 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 05:52:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:52:36 +0200 Message-ID: From: Albin Vega To: FreeBSD Mailingliste , Bacula Mailingliste Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Recycling of volumes in Bacula X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:52:39 -0000 Hello I have now set up my first couple of backup jobs, both local and over internet and it seems to bee working fine!! Quite happy about this since its my first time using Bacula! However I have a couple of questions about version control an recycling of volumes. First a little info. I have 5 jobs running, each with its ovn fd/sd and pool so they can run at the same time. I use incremental backup. Here is the config of the pool and client for one of the jobs. } # File Pool definition Pool { Name = buzzy-pool Pool Type = Backup # Accept Any Volume = yes # write on any volume in the pool LabelFormat = "buzzy-" Recycle = yes # Bacula can automatically recycle Volumes AutoPrune = yes # Prune expired volumes Volume Retention = 1 year # 1 year Maximum Volume Bytes = 50G # Limit Volume size to something reasonable Maximum Volumes = 10 # Limit number of Volumes in Pool } Question: When a volume gets recycled, are all the files on that volume just deleted, or is it just files that has been deleted on the server being backed up that is deleted? client { Name = buzzy-fd Address = buzzy.client.net FDPort = 9102 Catalog = MyCatalog Password = "Password" # password for FileDaemon 2 File Retention = 6 months # 6 months Job Retention = 6 months # six months AutoPrune = yes # Prune expired Jobs/Files What I would really like is this: 1. When a deleted file gets older than 6 months (a file that is deleted in the original server beeing backed up) I would like it to be deleted in the Bacula system. But I dont want files that in general is older than 6 months (and not deleted from the original server beeing backed up) to be deleted from the Bacula system. 2. When sombody changes a file, the file gets backed up again by Bacula, and every time its chaned it get backed up. Is there a way to configure that Bacula only keeps the 4 -5 last versions of this file, and delete the older ones? I have looked in the manual but not found any good explanations on this. Google it didnt turn up anything either.. Hope someone could give me som feedback on this. Best regards Albin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 13:11:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F0B01065672 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:11:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from claudiu.vasadi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37DAD8FC0C for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:11:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwb17 with SMTP id 17so963370wwb.31 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 06:11:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=K8o+S/DTHUTuJVacLlOsiagM/BdG5uQMvlo+wAHbfow=; b=EPfzKor96uWuTwvGwgGBFAD+UBF7bDji2U8AAcIgXW5y5cXSYy9tWthUnoSuwylbXC 0rPMGV4zTkO+0gWkRfq9bdFKnihxphge9iBTbsdPzggwIHd6aR6bVTST7PHSawTFhagy ir/iJeFAWaOChd6FGcwsaGFG1T2IsjIqwEs/E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=FIlmkrBHqa0LLtu+JImXoeOXPgqWASfYVYrgk74Ia2WGKxsCRv1416yYqepjlqnfAB Aiabm+mBqAUu+eJcYwvZZDS8+PhvqYjlb/70GM+VMep920vE3rT1x/gVm8SJ5e1yufYM VwNYbks8Ehbg1h1QIPxxld7xoLJNnGA8sDgLI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.47.80 with SMTP id s58mr1434469web.15.1285765891044; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 06:11:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.38.129 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 06:11:30 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:11:30 +0200 Message-ID: From: claudiu vasadi To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: ipsec with dynamic IP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:11:32 -0000 Hello fellas, I have 2x 8.1-RELEASE machines and I need to create a vpn between them. I've been reading the handbook on this subject and following the example there, I was able to establish a link. The only problem is that both my machines have dynamic (external) IP. My way of "solving" this little issue would be to create a script that would check each machine for a new external IP and if it finds it, replace it wherever it is needed (gif interface, racoon conf. file) My question to you is if there is another, cleaner, way of achieving this and if any of you faced the same situation, how did you come to solve it ? Also, is there a way to make the gif interface persistent over reboots ? I couldn;t find any so again, a script comes to mind. -- Best regards, Claudiu Vasadi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 13:13:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6334310656D0 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:13:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ws@au.dyndns.ws) Received: from ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E88938FC18 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:13:42 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ApEBANzWokyWZWdv/2dsb2JhbAAH6SqFRASETotN Received: from ppp103-111.static.internode.on.net (HELO [192.168.1.144]) ([150.101.103.111]) by ipmail05.adl6.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 29 Sep 2010 22:43:42 +0930 From: Wayne Sierke To: lhmwzy In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ASCII" Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 22:43:38 +0930 Message-ID: <1285766018.90337.1198.camel@predator-ii.buffyverse> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.30.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sed problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:13:43 -0000 On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 17:43 +0800, lhmwzy wrote: > #%sed -e '/GROUP/{/Test/! d}' test > sed: 1: "/GROUP/{/Test/! d} > ": extra characters at the end of d command > also have error. > the system: > #uname -a > FreeBSD bxzxfreebsd.slof.com 7.2-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p5 #1: > Fri Dec 4 17:58:13 CST 2009 > lhm@bxzxfreebsd.slof.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/lhmwzy amd64 > > 2010/9/29 lhmwzy : > > I have a txt file named test: > > > > USER Added by ftpadmin > > GENERAL 0,0 120 204800 0 > > LOGINS 1 0 -1 -1 > > TIMEFRAME 0 0 > > FLAGS 3 > > TAGLINE lanshu4385 > > DIR / > > ADDED 1284812614 ftpadmin > > EXPIRES 0 > > CREDITS 15000 > > RATIO 0 > > ALLUP 0 0 0 > > ALLDN 0 0 0 > > WKUP 0 0 0 > > WKDN 0 0 0 > > DAYUP 0 0 0 > > DAYDN 0 0 0 > > MONTHUP 0 0 0 > > MONTHDN 0 0 0 > > NUKE 0 0 0 > > TIME 0 1284812614 0 0 > > GROUP Teest 0 > > GROUP eest 0 > > GROUP dTeest 0 > > GROUP tTeest 0 > > GROUP Test 0 > > IP *@* > > > > when I use the follow command: > > > > #sed -e '/GROUP/{/Test/}! d' test > > then output error: > > > > sed: 1: "/GROUP/{/Test/}! d > > ": command } expects up to 0 address(es), found 1 > > > > But this command under linux is OK,how can I do? > > Try: sed -e '/GROUP/{/Test/!d;}' or: sed -e '/GROUP/{' -e '/Test/!d' -e '}' Wayne From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 13:39:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD8B5106566C for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:39:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drescherjm@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 679598FC1B for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:39:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz15 with SMTP id 15so674610bwz.13 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 06:39:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=tJO2Tg9FVyD04YcxB2kqbC928BNXCWorDLlGjpS6GKg=; b=VrhJ6pYRyjgKLuaUMRgIMqQ+Pu+mL564r/6iNLFqQAIQZzRxedtENM8ZzKcWWCXmpI iz7W8HT0qtOU20IJPiSJj9L9hKPu8IJHCqW1iGZ8QZ28nicKUOQ7kijjQP5vA1QqwZNg Bm74dSyMIruLIkISsCM3yU1MKuV5ula02W5bQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=gULkB6dQ2Rn8xHt3amFGgYaiOQ6tf92MG+8H+kAzzaK1ZBGKEiCC3dscTZitFj9SNA YejplW3pi0mb+jMl1FbGF4uME3UTz+2DJqUPS+32VYD3EkVzb1QsuMuKLPILmWbbaZtZ +Xu1pvV5KnpL22K0lo28c4hNhKkYYLRZXmdLU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.112.146 with SMTP id w18mr1328598bkp.16.1285765955578; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 06:12:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.49.68 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 06:12:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 09:12:35 -0400 Message-ID: From: John Drescher To: Albin Vega Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: FreeBSD Mailingliste , Bacula Mailingliste Subject: Re: [Bacula-users] Recycling of volumes in Bacula X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:39:52 -0000 2010/9/29 Albin Vega : > Hello > > I have now set up my first couple of backup jobs, both local and over > internet and it seems to bee working fine!! Quite happy about this since = its > my first time using Bacula! However=A0I have a=A0couple of=A0questions=A0= about > version control an recycling of volumes. > First a little info. I have 5 jobs running, each with its ovn fd/sd and p= ool > so they can run at the same time. I use incremental backup. Here is the > config of the pool and client for one of the jobs. > > } > # File Pool definition > Pool { > =A0 Name =3D buzzy-pool > =A0 Pool Type =3D Backup > #=A0 Accept Any Volume =3D yes=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0= =A0=A0 # write on any volume in the pool > =A0 LabelFormat =3D "buzzy-" > =A0 Recycle =3D yes=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0= =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 # Bacula can automatically > recycle Volumes > =A0 AutoPrune =3D yes=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0= =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0# Prune expired volumes > =A0 Volume Retention =3D 1 year=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0= =A0=A0 # 1 year > =A0 Maximum Volume Bytes =3D 50G=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 # Limit Volum= e size to something > reasonable > =A0 Maximum Volumes =3D 10=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0= =A0=A0=A0 =A0# Limit number of Volumes in Pool > } > > Question: When a volume gets recycled, are all the files on that volume j= ust > deleted, When a volume gets recycled the volume gets overwritten in the next backup that uses it. I think now you can have it automatically truncate if you want. >or is it just files that has been deleted on the server being > backed up that is deleted? No definitely not that. > client { > =A0 Name =3D buzzy-fd > =A0 Address =3D buzzy.client.net > =A0 FDPort =3D 9102 > =A0 Catalog =3D MyCatalog > =A0 Password =3D "Password"=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 # p= assword for FileDaemon 2 > =A0 File Retention =3D=A06 months=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 #=A06 mon= ths > =A0 Job Retention =3D 6 months=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 # six mon= ths > =A0 AutoPrune =3D yes=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0= =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 =A0# Prune expired Jobs/Files > > > What I would really like is this: > 1. When a deleted file gets older than 6 months (a file that is deleted i= n > the original server beeing backed up) I would like it to=A0be deleted=A0i= n the > Bacula system. But I dont want files that in general is older than 6 mont= hs > (and not deleted from the original server beeing backed up) to be deleted > from the Bacula system. Bacula does not have that feature. Also remember that recycling is an entire volume at once not parts of the volume get deleted over time. Bacula volumes are append only then delete the entire volume to recycle. The reason for this is bacula supports tape and other formats not just disk and all formats work the same way. > 2. When sombody changes a file, the file gets backed up again by Bacula, = and > every time its chaned it get backed up. Is there a way to configure that > Bacula only keeps the 4 -5 last versions of this file, and delete the old= er > ones? > Bacula does not work this way. And because of my answers above I am not sure you could force it do do what you want. John From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 13:58:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 532A0106564A for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:58:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from milu@dat.pl) Received: from jab.dat.pl (dat.pl [80.51.155.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0AE28FC1A for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:58:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jab.dat.pl (jsrv.dat.pl [127.0.0.1]) by jab.dat.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8726E9B for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:58:47 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at dat.pl Received: from jab.dat.pl ([127.0.0.1]) by jab.dat.pl (jab.dat.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id JMxxppyeq0Zs for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:58:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from snifi.localnet (unknown [212.69.68.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by jab.dat.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E269978 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:58:44 +0200 (CEST) From: Maciej Milewski To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:58:48 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.35-ARCH; KDE/4.5.1; x86_64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: X-KMail-Markup: true MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201009291558.49362.milu@dat.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: ipsec with dynamic IP X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:58:49 -0000 On Wednesday 29 September 2010 15:11:30, claudiu vasadi wrote: > Hello fellas, > > I have 2x 8.1-RELEASE machines and I need to create a vpn between them. > I've been reading the handbook on this subject and following the example > there, I was able to establish a link. > > The only problem is that both my machines have dynamic (external) IP. > > My way of "solving" this little issue would be to create a script that > would check each machine for a new external IP and if it finds it, replace > it wherever it is needed (gif interface, racoon conf. file) > > My question to you is if there is another, cleaner, way of achieving this > and if any of you faced the same situation, how did you come to solve it ? If you are not bound to IPSEC I think you could use OpenVPN and some kind of dyndns service. I haven't set up this between two servers although I'm successfuly using it in client-server mode and it works fine. > Also, is there a way to make the gif interface persistent over reboots ? I > couldn;t find any so again, a script comes to mind. Maybe cloned_interfaces or gif_interfaces in rc.conf would help? Regards, Maciej Milewski From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 14:02:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C3EE1065679 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:02:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsemene@cyanide-studio.com) Received: from relay.cyanide-studio.com (relay.cyanide-studio.com [91.121.7.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED2598FC12 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:02:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.cyanide-studio.com (LAubervilliers-153-52-12-153.w217-128.abo.wanadoo.fr [217.128.107.153]) by relay.cyanide-studio.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EA51963CD3 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:37:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.1.8.14]) by mail.cyanide-studio.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC30417BF43F for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:37:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.cyanide-studio.com ([10.1.8.3]) by localhost (mailguard.cyanide-studio.com [10.1.8.14]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 62173-07 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:37:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.1.8.123] (unknown [10.1.8.123]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bsemene@cyanide-studio.com) by mail.cyanide-studio.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 867A117BF439 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:37:09 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4CA34105.7050008@cyanide-studio.com> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:37:09 +0200 From: Bastien Semene User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fr; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: [Freebsd-update]cannot open files/.gz: No such file or directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:02:58 -0000 Hi, I'm trying to upgrade a system from 8.0-RELEASE to 8.1-RELEASE, but I have the following (non critical) errors : /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or directory This line appears hundred of times. After that, freebsd-update claims that many files are non existent in the new version and ask to delete them : /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or directory Attempting to automatically merge changes in files... done. The following file will be removed, as it no longer exists in FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE: /boot/device.hints Does this look reasonable (y/n)? n I have updated other systems without any difficulty (from the same 8.0 patch level to 8.1). I tried to delete /var/db/freebsd-update folder, but it changes nothing. Same error. I found older posts with people searching in the code which function did the error, but because everything was fine with the same context on other systems I think freebsd-update is mislead (it seems to miss the name of the file) at some point. Does anyone have some hints or direction to follow ? Thanks, -- Bastien Semene Administrateur Réseau& Système Cyanide Studio - FRANCE From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 14:14:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1733410656C6 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:14:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B798FC20 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:14:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb32 with SMTP id 32so321818wyb.13 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 07:14:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=eVRcoyBMrXLxKTVo/Z0GXskA5GBK/E6bK83mE0fZGL8=; b=URd+4TPP63TXsBg3X3oHssRKwSMICMXG435mE+3I2CfthfmSoiNKZIxxM3fcSs6gXf Cx1lZ+z0ddi4mbT3aP/o5sYhbSx4r4m0vUMZW8IJG5ScAimfLN8h9QUio5d8Nk0LR25s wLXO+P7WCMs/qBNU/aC550dV0dqzu4Et1TT+w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=BTqcw21yp2mZTueGJi5VrgdMXQ6oe5W2FDlkv27MgdvKykvQW3zox/k3rOQHjGFIIy YDI1hQD4u+oXSrQfqJyGM2cDX4WzWKADKzPcIxea1CRPqLSYOOC9NsVrjXWsUyxNQ7Mx TalaBaePJFA2oDNANiHEpQHX0nrJZtVr6nJoM= Received: by 10.227.145.66 with SMTP id c2mr1609400wbv.42.1285769624871; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 07:13:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Melon.malikania.fr (wifi-osiris-sec-181-194.u-strasbg.fr [130.79.181.194]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g9sm7196606wbh.7.2010.09.29.07.13.41 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 29 Sep 2010 07:13:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CA34965.3010509@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 16:12:53 +0200 From: David Demelier User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100923 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Location of sensors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:14:40 -0000 Hello, I just wonder how to know the location of the sensors, I got a lot of them on my HP Probook laptop : hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.temperature: 87.0C hw.acpi.thermal.tz1.temperature: 47.0C hw.acpi.thermal.tz2.temperature: 72.0C hw.acpi.thermal.tz3.temperature: 59.0C hw.acpi.thermal.tz4.temperature: 26.4C hw.acpi.thermal.tz5.temperature: 55.0C acpi_tz0: on acpi0 acpi_tz1: on acpi0 acpi_tz2: on acpi0 acpi_tz3: on acpi0 acpi_tz4: on acpi0 acpi_tz5: on acpi0 For example I know that there is two sensors on the CPU unit, and one one on the Wireless chipset but which one? If you have any ideas, Kind regards, From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 14:15:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E8F61065673 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:15:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lhmwzy@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pv0-f182.google.com (mail-pv0-f182.google.com [74.125.83.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11BF98FC0A for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:15:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pvc21 with SMTP id 21so226389pvc.13 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 07:15:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=hyXXTzY3c7MKIPsLlPicSWDmrBM8DEWf2DVyz6ij+4A=; b=mlTLYZfsHiv7yNYDzLzuEQ8PFD8e4J/Um9rp/8o/s8YaTyPIfPeS+lrLP98KglwqvY dblYODoulex/Akcb2nQJQkKEheJwMTi6J5HQ/AYyogOrhmAimbt+1PeubuoNPXLFgbCA dC08hnOUJr/BRLzTqt4g362iidR9wIOJsHTxI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=wgzb2Z+BJzRdzywu0KYCjuzRnSv7Z/X6f+VBI/0QOdZS+zf/cmURHVjunSxGNFuILI WfBiOCuqacSSe0In3fFFPS2FprZpNrqqGE1gDpJH194umYf95gCTT+0NzfwVQQp+y6Sp xcr7A41CSMzUXEwB/z3gx0siGQKrlSC8g/WKE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.54.13 with SMTP id c13mr1395786wfa.306.1285769711758; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 07:15:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.102.135 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 07:15:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1285766018.90337.1198.camel@predator-ii.buffyverse> References: <1285766018.90337.1198.camel@predator-ii.buffyverse> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 22:15:11 +0800 Message-ID: From: lhmwzy To: Wayne Sierke Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sed problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:15:13 -0000 Both are working. Thk very much. 2010/9/29 Wayne Sierke : > On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 17:43 +0800, lhmwzy wrote: >> #%sed -e '/GROUP/{/Test/! d}' test >> sed: 1: "/GROUP/{/Test/! d} >> ": extra characters at the end of d command >> also have error. >> the system: >> #uname -a >> FreeBSD bxzxfreebsd.slof.com 7.2-RELEASE-p5 FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE-p5 #1: >> Fri Dec =A04 17:58:13 CST 2009 >> lhm@bxzxfreebsd.slof.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/lhmwzy =A0amd64 >> >> 2010/9/29 lhmwzy : >> > I have a txt file named test: >> > >> > USER Added by ftpadmin >> > GENERAL 0,0 120 204800 0 >> > LOGINS 1 0 -1 -1 >> > TIMEFRAME 0 0 >> > FLAGS 3 >> > TAGLINE lanshu4385 >> > DIR / >> > ADDED 1284812614 ftpadmin >> > EXPIRES 0 >> > CREDITS 15000 >> > RATIO 0 >> > ALLUP 0 0 0 >> > ALLDN 0 0 0 >> > WKUP 0 0 0 >> > WKDN 0 0 0 >> > DAYUP 0 0 0 >> > DAYDN 0 0 0 >> > MONTHUP 0 0 0 >> > MONTHDN 0 0 0 >> > NUKE 0 0 0 >> > TIME 0 1284812614 0 0 >> > GROUP Teest 0 >> > GROUP eest 0 >> > GROUP dTeest 0 >> > GROUP tTeest 0 >> > GROUP Test 0 >> > IP *@* >> > >> > when I use the follow command: >> > >> > #sed -e '/GROUP/{/Test/}! d' test >> > then output error: >> > >> > sed: 1: "/GROUP/{/Test/}! d >> > ": command } expects up to 0 address(es), found 1 >> > >> > But this command under linux is OK,how can I do? >> > > > Try: > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0sed -e '/GROUP/{/Test/!d;}' > > or: > > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0sed -e '/GROUP/{' -e '/Test/!d' -e '}' > > > Wayne > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 14:16:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17431106567A for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:16:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@webtent.net) Received: from esmtp.webtent.net (esmtp.webtent.net [208.38.145.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B05578FC22 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:16:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by esmtp.webtent.net (WebTent ESMTP Postfix Internet Mail Exchange) with ESMTP id 6848E2887B for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:00:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from esmtp.webtent.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx1.webtent.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 69345-04 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:00:00 -0400 (EDT) Received: from [192.168.1.78] (mail.webtent.org [72.64.244.50]) (Authenticated sender: robert@esmtp.webtent.net) by esmtp.webtent.net (WebTent ESMTP Postfix Internet Mail Exchange) with ESMTPSA id 8B41428852 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:00:00 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4CA3465C.30908@webtent.net> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 09:59:56 -0400 From: Robert Fitzpatrick Organization: WebTent Networking, Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: WebTent Mailguard 1.0.2a Subject: mpt error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: robert@webtent.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:16:12 -0000 Just want to check here to see if anyone else has experienced the following errors showing up periodically in the logs on a FreeBSD 8.0 VPS on vmware ESXi... Sep 29 05:38:35 db1 kernel: mpt0: attempting to abort req 0xffffff80002a48c0:60350 function 0 Sep 29 05:38:35 db1 kernel: mpt0: completing timedout/aborted req 0xffffff80002a48c0:60350 Sep 29 05:38:35 db1 kernel: mpt0: abort of req 0xffffff80002a48c0:0 completed From what I googled, it appears this may be a disk I/O issue? I have another FreeBSD 8.1 install on an exact duplicate server, except it has a half the memory, with no errors. This ESXi server with the error has 12GB RAM and these servers do not use RAID at all. -- Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 14:22:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5E18106566C for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:22:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (dc.cis.okstate.edu [139.78.103.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8635E8FC1E for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:22:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (localhost.cis.okstate.edu [127.0.0.1]) by dc.cis.okstate.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o8TELqtc024880 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 09:21:52 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Message-Id: <201009291421.o8TELqtc024880@dc.cis.okstate.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <24877.1285770112.1@dc.cis.okstate.edu> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 09:21:52 -0500 From: Martin McCormick Subject: Not Sure Which Package has mssql_connect. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:22:46 -0000 I just upgraded a system from FreeBSD6.3 to 8.1 and only have 2 loose ends so far. One is that I discovered some of my C code needs a little touching up to continue to work right and the other is that we have an application on our system that uses freetds and makes mysql queries and presently gives me the following error: Fatal error: Call to undefined function mssql_connect() in Line number of script is given and that line reads: $numero= mssql_connect("sql" , "natreg1" , "PASSWD" ); As soon as I find out what port or package contains mysql_connect, we should be back in business. I did install mysql50-client. It does not contain the mysql_connect routine so I deleted it. I installed the port called mysql-connector-odbc which looked like a good possibility but it also does not have the connect routine. I installed php5 to get the php interpreter so it is possible that I have the wrong php and another php has the mysql_connect routine so at this time, I am all ears. Thanks for any suggestions. Martin McCormick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 14:31:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A385106566B for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:31:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glen.j.barber@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAA428FC16 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:31:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm9 with SMTP id 9so611064fxm.13 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 07:31:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=J+cz7r8zaPE0x4qDz4bpXBgth5H6g8KhyXWLuJC0MV4=; b=DukNDvIoW42N7F+HUJKSCvsYmi254qvlzl6eQbm+AsbGIIS8GJUB/LNB1BVNx0Vdg8 uI7vYnlG7/ECFWz0Y1vgV4yvj5MqZg87GuXNheQJaR0XM3pybQ9mFxGJJSOWs2QLpzZI KledfyLDYLQa+tiuHwZpAxF4n0u11s9uxJ59Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=udmEqGbJXwcr7X74id+jBRVVhoMFSBVlu40ROQ/KxZOkHKXsclf1IvafZSpx/rw9HQ xzuvVmcEIrPAzATgnmWtxS7tGcr7l57URGsigk3oGCednlbT6LaOWAR3+G2lHxto8MuN h7MfLsMQVEcuWa9vi26DQsXPmx8sL48uH2v+Y= Received: by 10.223.101.18 with SMTP id a18mr1859566fao.19.1285770660299; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 07:31:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from schism.local (173-161-130-225-Philadelphia.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [173.161.130.225]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e17sm3806827faa.39.2010.09.29.07.30.54 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 29 Sep 2010 07:30:56 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CA34D9D.2020105@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:30:53 -0400 From: Glen Barber User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin McCormick References: <201009291421.o8TELqtc024880@dc.cis.okstate.edu> In-Reply-To: <201009291421.o8TELqtc024880@dc.cis.okstate.edu> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Not Sure Which Package has mssql_connect. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:31:02 -0000 Hi Martin, On 9/29/10 10:21 AM, Martin McCormick wrote: > I just upgraded a system from FreeBSD6.3 to 8.1 and only have 2 > loose ends so far. > > One is that I discovered some of my C code needs a > little touching up to continue to work right and the other is > that we have an application on our system that uses freetds and > makes mysql queries and presently gives me the following error: > > Fatal error: Call to undefined function mssql_connect() in > > Line number of script is given and that line reads: > > $numero= mssql_connect("sql" , "natreg1" , "PASSWD" ); > Are you sure mssql_connect() isn't a typo? The rest of your email states mysql_connect(). > As soon as I find out what port or package contains > mysql_connect, we should be back in business. > > I did install mysql50-client. It does not contain the > mysql_connect routine so I deleted it. I installed the port > called mysql-connector-odbc which looked like a good possibility > but it also does not have the connect routine. > > I installed php5 to get the php interpreter so it is > possible that I have the wrong php and another php has the > mysql_connect routine so at this time, I am all ears. > Cheers, -- Glen Barber From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 14:35:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB6D9106566B for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:35:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glarkin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail1.sourcehosting.net (113901-app1.sourcehosting.net [72.32.213.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7C228FC08 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:35:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 68-189-245-235.dhcp.oxfr.ma.charter.com ([68.189.245.235] helo=cube.entropy.prv) by mail1.sourcehosting.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1P0xl3-0007Vf-D8; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:35:50 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (fireball.entropy.prv [192.168.1.12]) by cube.entropy.prv (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F1E34574D9D; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:35:44 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4CA34EBB.5070704@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:35:39 -0400 From: Greg Larkin Organization: The FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin McCormick References: <201009291421.o8TELqtc024880@dc.cis.okstate.edu> In-Reply-To: <201009291421.o8TELqtc024880@dc.cis.okstate.edu> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 OpenPGP: id=1C940290 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Not Sure Which Package has mssql_connect. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: glarkin@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:35:51 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Martin McCormick wrote: > I just upgraded a system from FreeBSD6.3 to 8.1 and only have 2 > loose ends so far. > > One is that I discovered some of my C code needs a > little touching up to continue to work right and the other is > that we have an application on our system that uses freetds and > makes mysql queries and presently gives me the following error: > > Fatal error: Call to undefined function mssql_connect() in > > Line number of script is given and that line reads: > > $numero= mssql_connect("sql" , "natreg1" , "PASSWD" ); > > As soon as I find out what port or package contains > mysql_connect, we should be back in business. > > I did install mysql50-client. It does not contain the > mysql_connect routine so I deleted it. I installed the port > called mysql-connector-odbc which looked like a good possibility > but it also does not have the connect routine. > > I installed php5 to get the php interpreter so it is > possible that I have the wrong php and another php has the > mysql_connect routine so at this time, I am all ears. > > Thanks for any suggestions. > > Martin McCormick Hi Martin, You referred to C code at the top of your message, but are you actually looking for a PHP extension that contains the mssql_connection function so some PHP code runs correctly? I also have a question whether you're looking for a PHP extension that connections to a MS SQL server or one that connects to a MySQL server. I'm guessing you're trying to connect to MS SQL. If so, please install http://www.freshports.org/databases/php5-mssql/, and you should be all set. You shouldn't need to install http://www.freshports.org/databases/php5-mysql/ unless you're trying to connect to a MySQL server, too. Hope that helps, Greg - -- Greg Larkin http://www.FreeBSD.org/ - The Power To Serve http://www.sourcehosting.net/ - Ready. Set. Code. http://twitter.com/sourcehosting/ - Follow me, follow you -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFMo0660sRouByUApARAoexAJ0XugUPZFEGysN/9V04ixR48hUQdgCgwyca hqf9E5l6TdgR+VLanm3RZ60= =yufJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 14:49:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7298106566B for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:49:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33C6E8FC0C for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:49:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz15 with SMTP id 15so755817bwz.13 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 07:49:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=m90wjHGST6UtGbalAO96Y0EDmr5WMAM+26109MqZi4c=; b=LirCk/h+ykwU1IEzr7Jv/OefWV0zfEMQEMqNTDcGNCo5YS+Jg4bLBKhhtuTI5fnc2F MLsfx5G0Ltwyy95C10U22zN4H+Sfs4dZ84c1TOAvIzzTayyiVq5ydOxNM9NSNoEFX7wS sWc9dhcWRJXtD2y2Zz2mK65UCrTtHSsxKRpGo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Y24F2LKLF49UBWl99ojK3sRJod4oixAv6ORfmw4xyvPFDj8rFyi5lVWBEUuQNtb+JB i4zq8anzxMKTNhfj82WJ2+GsgzzDX8PDoQm75HuJwpmWVi1aIl5HThHEY5aV6db2jpHA /QNN4TcWfepJpdcK2teSJyYUspHt/RsveEYII= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.117.205 with SMTP id s13mr1274877bkq.140.1285770212941; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 07:23:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.148.82 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 07:23:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4CA34105.7050008@cyanide-studio.com> References: <4CA34105.7050008@cyanide-studio.com> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 16:23:32 +0200 Message-ID: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?= To: Bastien Semene Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Freebsd-update]cannot open files/.gz: No such file or directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:49:09 -0000 On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Bastien Semene wrote: > =A0Hi, > > I'm trying to upgrade a system from 8.0-RELEASE to 8.1-RELEASE, but I hav= e > the following (non critical) errors : > /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or director= y > This line appears hundred of times. > After that, freebsd-update claims that many files are non existent in the > new version and ask to delete them : > > /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or director= y > /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or director= y > /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or director= y > /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or director= y > /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or director= y > /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or director= y > Attempting to automatically merge changes in files... done. > > The following file will be removed, as it no longer exists in > FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE: /boot/device.hints > Does this look reasonable (y/n)? n > > I have updated other systems without any difficulty (from the same 8.0 pa= tch > level to 8.1). > > I tried to delete /var/db/freebsd-update folder, but it changes nothing. > Same error. > I found older posts with people searching in the code which function did = the > error, but because everything was fine with the same context on other > systems I think freebsd-update is mislead (it seems to miss the name of t= he > file) at some point. > > Does anyone have some hints or direction to follow ? I reported this a while ago and try to get in touch with Colin Percival with no luck. I finally could afford a fresh install. > > Thanks, > > -- > Bastien Semene > Administrateur R=E9seau& =A0Syst=E8me > > Cyanide Studio - FRANCE > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 15:06:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60CF61065670 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:06:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhelfman@e-e.com) Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (mail.experts-exchange.com [72.29.183.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ED5E8FC1F for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:06:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.experts-exchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4F41F2F37E; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:06:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at experts-exchange.com Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.experts-exchange.com (mail.experts-exchange.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DO3G0OhYjNS4; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:06:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eggman.experts-exchange.com (unknown [76.209.222.32]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jhelfman) by mail.experts-exchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2F568F2F377; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:06:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by eggman.experts-exchange.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, _d Sep 2010 08:08:35 -0700 Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:08:35 -0700 From: Jason To: Fernando =?iso-8859-1?Q?Apestegu=EDa?= Message-ID: <20100929150835.GA59311@Jason-Helfmans-MacBook-Pro.local> References: <4CA34105.7050008@cyanide-studio.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: Darwin 10.4.0 X-Living-The-Dream: I love the SLO Life! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Bastien Semene , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Freebsd-update]cannot open files/.gz: No such file or directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:06:43 -0000 On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 04:23:32PM +0200, Fernando Apesteguía thus spake: >On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Bastien Semene > wrote: >>  Hi, >> >> I'm trying to upgrade a system from 8.0-RELEASE to 8.1-RELEASE, but I have >> the following (non critical) errors : >> /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or directory >> This line appears hundred of times. >> After that, freebsd-update claims that many files are non existent in the >> new version and ask to delete them : >> >> /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or directory >> /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or directory >> /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or directory >> /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or directory >> /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or directory >> /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or directory >> Attempting to automatically merge changes in files... done. >> >> The following file will be removed, as it no longer exists in >> FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE: /boot/device.hints >> Does this look reasonable (y/n)? n >> >> I have updated other systems without any difficulty (from the same 8.0 patch >> level to 8.1). >> >> I tried to delete /var/db/freebsd-update folder, but it changes nothing. >> Same error. >> I found older posts with people searching in the code which function did the >> error, but because everything was fine with the same context on other >> systems I think freebsd-update is mislead (it seems to miss the name of the >> file) at some point. >> >> Does anyone have some hints or direction to follow ? > >I reported this a while ago and try to get in touch with Colin >Percival with no luck. I finally could afford a fresh install. > >> >> Thanks, >> >> -- >> Bastien Semene >> Administrateur Réseau&  Système >> >> Cyanide Studio - FRANCE >> What is the exact command line you are running that gets this error? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 15:20:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4645E1065672 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:20:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (dc.cis.okstate.edu [139.78.103.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F092C8FC13 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:20:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (localhost.cis.okstate.edu [127.0.0.1]) by dc.cis.okstate.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o8TFKNRT073028 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:20:23 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Message-Id: <201009291520.o8TFKNRT073028@dc.cis.okstate.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <73026.1285773623.1@dc.cis.okstate.edu> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:20:23 -0500 From: Martin McCormick Subject: Re: Not Sure Which Package has mssql_connect. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:20:46 -0000 Glen Barber writes: >Are you sure mssql_connect() isn't a typo? The rest of your email >states mysql_connect(). Wow! I've been doing too much of this this week. It's actually the other way around. The problem is with mssql_connect and my references to mysql were based on a bit of confusion. We are connecting to a remote SQL server and pulling information off of it. Sorry for the confusion and thanks. Martin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 15:35:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8109F1065670 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:35:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsemene@cyanide-studio.com) Received: from relay.cyanide-studio.com (relay.cyanide-studio.com [91.121.7.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E48C8FC0C for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:35:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.cyanide-studio.com (LAubervilliers-153-52-12-153.w217-128.abo.wanadoo.fr [217.128.107.153]) by relay.cyanide-studio.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CD0B965B27 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:34:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (unknown [10.1.8.14]) by mail.cyanide-studio.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D881717BF473 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:34:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.cyanide-studio.com ([10.1.8.3]) by localhost (mailguard.cyanide-studio.com [10.1.8.14]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with ESMTP id 66147-09 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:34:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.1.8.123] (unknown [10.1.8.123]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: bsemene@cyanide-studio.com) by mail.cyanide-studio.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABEF917BF439 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:34:58 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4CA35CA2.9030809@cyanide-studio.com> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:34:58 +0200 From: Bastien Semene User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; fr; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4CA34105.7050008@cyanide-studio.com> <20100929150835.GA59311@Jason-Helfmans-MacBook-Pro.local> In-Reply-To: <20100929150835.GA59311@Jason-Helfmans-MacBook-Pro.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: [Freebsd-update]cannot open files/.gz: No such file or directory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:35:00 -0000 Le 29/09/2010 17:08, Jason a écrit : > On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 04:23:32PM +0200, Fernando Apesteguía thus spake: >> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Bastien Semene >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I'm trying to upgrade a system from 8.0-RELEASE to 8.1-RELEASE, but >>> I have >>> the following (non critical) errors : >>> /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or >>> directory >>> This line appears hundred of times. >>> After that, freebsd-update claims that many files are non existent >>> in the >>> new version and ask to delete them : >>> >>> /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or >>> directory >>> /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or >>> directory >>> /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or >>> directory >>> /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or >>> directory >>> /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or >>> directory >>> /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or >>> directory >>> Attempting to automatically merge changes in files... done. >>> >>> The following file will be removed, as it no longer exists in >>> FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE: /boot/device.hints >>> Does this look reasonable (y/n)? n >>> >>> I have updated other systems without any difficulty (from the same >>> 8.0 patch >>> level to 8.1). >>> >>> I tried to delete /var/db/freebsd-update folder, but it changes >>> nothing. >>> Same error. >>> I found older posts with people searching in the code which function >>> did the >>> error, but because everything was fine with the same context on other >>> systems I think freebsd-update is mislead (it seems to miss the name >>> of the >>> file) at some point. >>> >>> Does anyone have some hints or direction to follow ? >> >> I reported this a while ago and try to get in touch with Colin >> Percival with no luck. I finally could afford a fresh install. >> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> -- >>> Bastien Semene >>> Administrateur Réseau& Système >>> >>> Cyanide Studio - FRANCE >>> > > What is the exact command line you are running that gets this error? I'm exactly using : freebsd-update -r 8.1-RELEASE upgrade I'm sticking the manual, but using a custom kernel. At this stage this should change nothing. # uname -a [root@backup] FreeBSD backup.cyanide-studio.com 8.0-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE-p1 #3: Mon Dec 7 14:44:37 CET 2009 root@backup.cyanide-studio.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GEOMKERNEL amd64 I installed the 8.0-RELEASE from CDs, as you can see I updated to patchlevel 1 without trouble. The only difference from other systems may be these geom drivers. Here is the complete command output, I said yes to the first question to show you how bad the question is : Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found. Fetching metadata signature for 8.0-RELEASE from update4.FreeBSD.org... done. Fetching metadata index... done. Inspecting system... done. WARNING: This system is running a "geomkernel" kernel, which is not a kernel configuration distributed as part of FreeBSD 8.0-RELEASE. This kernel will not be updated: you MUST update the kernel manually before running "/usr/sbin/freebsd-update install". The following components of FreeBSD seem to be installed: kernel/generic src/base src/bin src/cddl src/contrib src/crypto src/etc src/games src/gnu src/include src/krb5 src/lib src/libexec src/release src/rescue src/sbin src/secure src/share src/sys src/tools src/ubin src/usbin world/base world/catpages world/dict world/doc world/info world/lib32 world/manpages world/proflibs The following components of FreeBSD do not seem to be installed: world/games Fetching metadata signature for 8.1-RELEASE from update4.FreeBSD.org... done. Fetching metadata index... done. Fetching 1 metadata patches. done. Applying metadata patches... done. Fetching 1 metadata files... done. Inspecting system... done. Fetching files from 8.0-RELEASE for merging... done. Preparing to download files... done. Attempting to automatically merge changes in files... done. /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or directory /usr/sbin/freebsd-update: cannot open files/.gz: No such file or director [...CUT...] The following file will be removed, as it no longer exists in FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE: /boot/device.hints Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y The following file will be removed, as it no longer exists in FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE: /etc/amd.map Does this look reasonable (y/n)? n -- Bastien Semene Administrateur Réseau& Système Cyanide Studio - FRANCE From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 17:00:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4213C1065695 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:00:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phanquochien@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 477328FC19 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:00:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb33 with SMTP id 33so74856wyb.13 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:00:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=vesY2h3xhG1867VXKT7/C0CaKIWxa7o7QwiNVP6TgaA=; b=x61d6B41hvaRTEkjmiSljJSPoiCAp4iclIuHMB9v9VefODYS2ZQsqxvHoCKcht38Fg JS5jkLL/DihGY7q+hYrXHoA/k7bqLw8qZeYIivbaipZRjh7rCliwzTxuuQIcd7uGgckp Ri/Vl7HKT780gDg+EB/Rh8kn61Z2ttQteo8mM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=IlhaSx4NmjD6GabnM87DsGgT2kYe5P7yq/guox8u22ZGOGQ47iEYHOx/gBRCTdNfhD tmbpt9ldPi/VGyvHu0AUIvGiv48xsGRQlYDWy08FmUFmPr2JutKXCjhTxFtXaP1ydacH RuKUkq1Ir4dZj1+XDynePePFmYb5yfXRr67hs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.134.206 with SMTP id k14mr1737636wbt.121.1285779628291; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:00:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.227.142.194 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:00:28 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 00:00:28 +0700 Message-ID: From: Phan Quoc Hien To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Can not setting up a Jail Directory Tree X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:00:30 -0000 Hi, I'm using FreeBSD 8.1, I have followed http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/jails-build.htmlto create a jail. When I create jail directory tree with command: make installworld DESTDIR=$D It run look good about 1 min..and output error below: ===> gnu/usr.bin/texinfo/texindex (install) > install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 texindex /jail/fulljail/usr/bin > install -o root -g wheel -m 444 texindex.1.gz > /jail/fulljail/usr/share/man/man1 > ===> gnu/usr.bin/texinfo/doc (install) > install-info --quiet --defsection=Miscellaneous --defentry= info.info/jail/fulljail/usr/share/info/dir > install-info --quiet --defsection=Miscellaneous --defentry= > info-stnd.info /jail/fulljail/usr/share/info/dir > install-info --quiet --defsection=Miscellaneous --defentry= > texinfo.info /jail/fulljail/usr/share/info/dir > install -o root -g wheel -m 444 info.info.gz info-stnd.info.gz > texinfo.info.gz /jail/fulljail/usr/share/info > ===> include (install) > creating osreldate.h from newvers.sh > touch: not found > *** Error code 127 > > Stop in /usr/src/include. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/src. > Error: The command 'make installworld' failed. > Refer to the error report(s) above. > Why error? -- Best regards, Mr.Hien E-mail: phanquochien@gmail.com Website: www.mrhien.info From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 17:09:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 957B41065672 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:09:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from drizzt321@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E8678FC22 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:09:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwd6 with SMTP id 6so730371qwd.13 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:09:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=0XHepxNKLVZrhsz0aM6oG5N7bZD9EoREUxgacoI/VEQ=; b=PxG2o2vZk4Ps+URE+Ppx7x2zi2GCB0LdZciLV7SjjcEuzK79dKpmMttr13A+zGixxP ffZw8Fb3UbrJWWUgeVPxnDuVtvOFyx3ESFYbz6Uf0NKGCRx1yfI7Eo7ZQecmS9j1nt69 N7k+vjztpov+1VJlNzp9ff5oW0vaoOUZx4jy0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=tPgPSe+c20iMzh/y8cm+sibQDPZ+FVabcqG8+72HYpW5ZW/549j+a4Btaq7NpU9S3J dYFDN+GrqoL987k8E5cEOBrFQdsAynvU2wJsvSMvgYfnFe3aNDCqFUDk/fOBUjE7ZdK9 KKn6avsQ9EVvk+8ZwLeocVI7Ve/GEo1ik6B68= Received: by 10.224.82.203 with SMTP id c11mr1327382qal.299.1285780142722; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:09:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.236.85 with HTTP; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:02:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4CA302E5.9050004@pp.dyndns.biz> From: Aaron Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:02:43 -0700 Message-ID: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Disappearing available space with ZFS...what am I missing? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:09:04 -0000 On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 03:14, krad wrote: > > > On 29 September 2010 10:12, Morgan Wesstr=F6m > wrote: >> >> On 2010-09-29 07:56, Aaron wrote: >>> >>> I've created a ZFS pool with zpool create tank raidz ada0 ada1 ada2 >>> ada3, and then I add some additional mountpoints (I think they're >>> called) using zfs create tank/storage, etc. In zpool list, I see the >>> pool with 3.62T available. With df -h, I see 2.4T available for tank, >>> and tank/storage. When I first created tank, it had the 3.62T >>> available as I expected. What am I missing? I do have compression set >>> to gzip-9 on tank which gets inherited like I want, don't know if that >>> would affect anything. >>> >>> --Aaron >> >> There's nothing wrong here that I can see, you just have to make a >> distinction between the zfs pool and the filesystems within the pool and= I >> agree it can be confusing at first. >> >> The numbers suggest you are using 4 x 1TB (base 10 TB) drives? That equa= ls >> 3.7TiB (base 2 TB) which is the unit zpool/zfs uses. This is the total >> amount of space available to the pool and includes all space on all driv= es >> in the pool. Nothing strange so far. >> >> Now, since you've told zpool to create filesystems within the pool using >> raidz, the filesystems will have 25% less space available since this spa= ce >> is used for parity data. So a filesystem using the whole pool will repor= t >> having 3.7 * 0.75 =3D 2.7TiB available which is in agreement with your >> numbers. A raidz filesystem will always lose 1 disk worth of space and w= ill >> never report that space as available to you since it will always be occu= pied >> with parity data. >> >> The pool on the other hand doesn't make a distinction, in this case >> anyway, between user data and parity data so zpool will always report wh= at's >> actually unallocated on all your physical drives in the pool. For every = GiB >> you allocate in the filesystem you will allocate 1.33GiB in the pool sin= ce >> that includes parity data. "zfs list" and "df -h" are your best friends = to >> find out how much space is available for your files. Don't bother about >> "zpool list". >> >> Regards >> Morgan >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > It gets even more hairy when you start adding in reservsions, quotas, and > compression. Slap dedup on top of that and you get magically growing fs > according to df 8) > > Ahhh...yea. Thanks everyone! I didn't realize that zpool status would show the raw space (so 4x1TB base10 is ~3.7TB base2), and not the available space after the 4-1 RAIDZ usage consumes. So that all makes sense, as well as with reservations, quotas and compression now causing df to not really know what's going on. If I want to get the actual values of available space vs used space, I should use zfs get all and look at the properties there? --Aaron From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 17:23:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 599E1106566C for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:23:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@magnesium.net) Received: from toxic.magnesium.net (toxic.magnesium.net [207.154.84.15]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 485858FC12 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:23:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by toxic.magnesium.net (Postfix, from userid 1070) id A0342DA9C2; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:23:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:23:46 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: FreeBSD Mailing List Message-ID: <20100929172346.GA49250@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 21 of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Subject: pondering my DNS config.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:23:45 -0000 I spent hours yesterday checking around my named/DNS files. I thing the guy who rewrote how I _had_ things set up, messup. pinging ns1.thought.org is void. It is plato.thought.org that is my pfSense server that might better be my primary nameserver. (Still testing mail; waiting for a response from freebsd-test to show up on thought.org.) -- Gary Kline Seattle BSD Users' Group (seabug) | kline@magnesium.net Thought Unlimited Org's Alternate Email Site http://www.magnesium.net/~kline To live is not a necessity; but to live honorably...is a necessity. -Kant From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 17:24:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA4C1106566C for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:24:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout023.mac.com (asmtpout023.mac.com [17.148.16.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2DD18FC12 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:24:11 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp023.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0L9I00CCIR0A9W50@asmtp023.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:24:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1004200000 definitions=main-1009290109 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.0.10011,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-09-29_08:2010-09-29, 2010-09-29, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: <4CA34965.3010509@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:24:10 -0700 Message-id: References: <4CA34965.3010509@gmail.com> To: David Demelier X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Location of sensors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:24:11 -0000 Hi-- On Sep 29, 2010, at 7:12 AM, David Demelier wrote: > I just wonder how to know the location of the sensors, I got a lot of them on my HP Probook laptop : > > hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.temperature: 87.0C > hw.acpi.thermal.tz1.temperature: 47.0C > hw.acpi.thermal.tz2.temperature: 72.0C > hw.acpi.thermal.tz3.temperature: 59.0C > hw.acpi.thermal.tz4.temperature: 26.4C > hw.acpi.thermal.tz5.temperature: 55.0C On a good day, HP will have documented their ACPI zones well enough for you to tell what they are. It's also possible that contacting HP's support might dig up more info. Failing that, however, you might be able to look at the Hardware/Health Status page in the BIOS, note the relative temperatures being displayed and what they are with, and then compare the sysctl output after a boot. You might also be able to boot into Windows and try running a vendor-supplied thermal monitoring utility, and either look for debugging info, perhaps in the logs if it produces any, or again try to figure out the correspondence. Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 17:36:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A96C4106564A for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:36:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ryan.coleman@cwis.biz) Received: from qmta03.westchester.pa.hmc1.comcast.net (qmta03.westchester.pa.hmc1.comcast.net [76.96.53.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CF898FC24 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:36:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta03.westchester.pa.hmc1.comcast.net ([76.96.53.19]) by qmta03.westchester.pa.hmc1.comcast.net with comcast id Cb8e1f00U0Qry6409hctK3; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:36:53 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.9] ([70.89.202.1]) by omta03.westchester.pa.hmc1.comcast.net with bizsmtp id Chcs1f00602K3z201hctF8; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:36:53 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Ryan Coleman In-Reply-To: <20100929172346.GA49250@thought.org> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 12:36:52 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <48B751CC-92B6-4263-B32A-932D17B8726B@cwis.biz> References: <20100929172346.GA49250@thought.org> To: Gary Kline X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: pondering my DNS config.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:36:54 -0000 Can you post the configuration file for thought.org? I'm rusty at it but someone might be able to help out. On Sep 29, 2010, at 12:23 PM, Gary Kline wrote: >=20 > I spent hours yesterday checking around my named/DNS files. I thing = the guy who rewrote how I _had_ things set up, messup. pinging = ns1.thought.org is void. > It is plato.thought.org that is my pfSense server that might better be = my primary nameserver. >=20 > (Still testing mail; waiting for a response from freebsd-test to show = up > on thought.org.) >=20 > --=20 > Gary Kline Seattle BSD Users' Group (seabug) | = kline@magnesium.net > Thought Unlimited Org's Alternate Email Site > http://www.magnesium.net/~kline > To live is not a necessity; but to live honorably...is a necessity. = -Kant >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 17:37:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E22D1065696 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:37:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C17988FC12 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:37:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwb17 with SMTP id 17so1350160wwb.31 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:37:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wvswkXz+YhAKp8/wTXYagTTwrTlZtNDI6u1rYaflCpc=; b=IRWOu5yDv3qGyFACJtmSg2BKreVgeyBcN6d5pt+8aBz48J5oTH8lTcfwsPPx/2QaNq 5mOdx5ocSyy+O97uQdHSisnwcGWgrRIhBTQmWswLYrtGM+bq/PmLcwV1lOLgG+F8ZM7N JvGp3dHzVwbKtpOynLlJxdY9ZofDb2iioCeGE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=KtK13Z60hmDnbTzTRkybhvpDOxDy/kmLgUoQzJoJJeXTSiaKKj30EAnjRiQj4m/Sip utsXiJTFpLs4GcY0r3eab2g6l01N+Yiryk8xvzD55yXDYVSDPVv5AX+zNHJ3AyI6JmGU WKyafyYXv2HoLbguBuNxc4m1/9KO2gbmRGLSg= Received: by 10.216.44.141 with SMTP id n13mr2843272web.16.1285781823505; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:37:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p82sm5577393weq.3.2010.09.29.10.36.59 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 29 Sep 2010 10:37:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:36:57 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100929183657.13dfea89@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <4CA333EC.40704@ose.nl> References: <800348.43799.qm@web113901.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <246095.42115.qm@web113905.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4CA2E345.7070006@ose.nl> <20100929124230.00004796@unknown> <4CA333EC.40704@ose.nl> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Cache Memory in top command X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:37:05 -0000 On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 14:41:16 +0200 Bas Smeelen wrote: > On 09/29/2010 01:42 PM, Bruce Cran wrote: > > On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:57:09 +0200 > > Bas Smeelen wrote: > > > > > >> *Cache:* number of clean pages caching data that are available for > >> immediate reallocation > >> http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=top&sektion=1 > >> > >> > > I believe the "Cache" value is almost totally unrelated to the > > amount of memory used for caching: FreeBSD has a unified buffer > > cache so any memory is available for use as cache. Unlike Linux, > > you can't look at the line in 'top' to see how much memory is being > > used for buffers and cache. > > > > You can find more information about the VM architecture at > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/arch-handbook/vm.html . > > > > > The way I understand it: > The amount of cached file data pages is included in the Wired value > The amount of free cache pages that can immediatly can be re-used for > caching is the Cache value I don't see why it would be included in wired, and I'm pretty sure that's wrong. The cache queue is a stock of clean pages, it's sort of an intermediate state between inactive and free. Most memory allocations can be performed directly from the cache queue, which allows memory to hold useful data right up to the moment it's reallocated, and it allows FreeBSD to run with very little free (i.e. wasted) memory. Cache memory is topped-up with memory from the inactive queue in the background. Likewise inactive memory is topped-up from active memory. Since that's done on demand the values are virtually meaningless. > The Buf value is the numbder of pages used for BIO-level disk caching > I think that the value of Inactive also includes some kind of > application data cache Pretty much anything that isn't permanently wired can end-up in the Inactive queue it's a general purpose queue for ageing-out memory. > So as you also state, unlike linux there is no way of determining the > amount of memory used for *all caching* with top FreeBSD sees most memory as a cache of a disk backing-store. So when you are running a program, it's executing inside a cache of the on-disk binary and its variables are a cache of the swap backing-store. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 18:38:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73484106566C for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:38:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (dc.cis.okstate.edu [139.78.103.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43A658FC08 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:38:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (localhost.cis.okstate.edu [127.0.0.1]) by dc.cis.okstate.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o8TIbfR2067340 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:37:55 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Message-Id: <201009291837.o8TIbfR2067340@dc.cis.okstate.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <67338.1285785461.1@dc.cis.okstate.edu> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:37:41 -0500 From: Martin McCormick Subject: Re: Not Sure Which Package has mssql_connect. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:38:51 -0000 Greg Larkin writes: > You referred to C code at the top of your message, That was actually incidental. I was thinking about what had happened when I transplanted some home-grown C code in to 8.1 and had to clean up some of my lazy habits to make it work again. So far, nothing I haven't been able to handle. > but are you actually > looking for a PHP extension that contains the mssql_connection function > so some PHP code runs correctly? Yes. > I also have a question whether you're > looking for a PHP extension that connections to a MS SQL server or one > that connects to a MySQL server. I'm guessing you're trying to connect > to MS SQL. In spite of my rather confused question, that is exactly what I am doing. We talk to a remote mssql server and pull off new data from a database. > > If so, please install http://www.freshports.org/databases/php5-mssql/, > and you should be all set. You shouldn't need to install > http://www.freshports.org/databases/php5-mysql/ unless you're trying to > connect to a MySQL server, too. The first port is what I needed. Many thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 18:59:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62558106566C for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:59:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (dc.cis.okstate.edu [139.78.103.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18D0B8FC15 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:59:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (localhost.cis.okstate.edu [127.0.0.1]) by dc.cis.okstate.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o8TIxIne059686 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:59:18 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Message-Id: <201009291859.o8TIxIne059686@dc.cis.okstate.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <59678.1285786758.1@dc.cis.okstate.edu> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:59:18 -0500 From: Martin McCormick Subject: pkg_config Version Numbers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 18:59:42 -0000 I built bind9.7.1 on a 64-bit FreeBSD system and then did make package-recursive in order to produce a package that can be installed on some other systems. After doing so, I get the following warning on numerous other packages when I install them. pkg_add: warning: package pkg_name' requires 'pkg-config-0.23_1', but 'pkg-config-0.25' is installed This looks like it could be harmless enough as pkg-config-0.25 is newer but I thought I would ask before creating any more possible monsters. Is this something to fix or can I forget it? Thank you. Martin McCormick From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 20:24:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 516C4106572A for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 20:24:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9241A8FC1A for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 20:24:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by thought.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3A935E80869; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:24:23 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 13:24:23 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Bas Smeelen Message-ID: <20100929202423.GB13004@thought.org> References: <20100928162839.GA32198@thought.org> <7B0DAD9C-ED75-4188-9407-F86F44C94F47@cwis.biz> <19639A29-A22D-474B-8CD6-E62D2A4CCB15@cwis.biz> <4CA2D921.2080402@ose.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CA2D921.2080402@ose.nl> X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 24 years of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what is from [sic (wrong)] with this picture? -- Answer: It's Ubuntu, not FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 20:24:21 -0000 On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 08:13:53AM +0200, Bas Smeelen wrote: > > >> You can't have a sending domain as thought.org if the @ record for thought.org doesn't exist, IIRC. > >> > >> Look to your DNS for the solution, IMNSHO. > No MX for thought.org > It did have a SOA a minute ago, but this is gone also > >>> > >>> By default, postfix was installed on my ubuntu desktop. I am not > >>> familiar with it. I would =like= it to be sending mail to my server > >>> without the $HOST name instead of $HOST.$DOMAIN name. I know there are > >>> a bunch of us who use this kind of setup: FreeBSD for server things and > >>> some version of linux as a desktop. > >>> > >>> Really, this looks like a postfix blunder. How do I tell postfix to > >>> rewrite th e outgoing address without the hostname? > >>> > This is a postfix question. > Modify main.cf and set myorigin I guess? > http://www.postfix.org/documentation.html > Yes! changing the line in main.cf lets things get thru to my server cleanly, thanks for the tip. I still don't understand what's wrong with my DNS files. Hopefully, other folk on-list will see what's messed up. -gary > > DISCLAIMER: This e-mail is for the intended recipient(s) only. Access, disclosure, copying, > distribution or reliance on any of it by anyone else is prohibited. If you have received it > by mistake please let us know by reply and then delete it from your system. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix The 7.90a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php http://journey.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 20:28:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3677E1065670 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 20:28:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cwhiteh@onetel.com) Received: from april.london.02.net (april.london.02.net [87.194.255.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F08338FC14 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 20:28:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eco.config (93.97.24.219) by april.london.02.net (8.5.124.10) id 4C98C91F0030707D; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:27:55 +0100 Message-ID: <4CA3A14B.5030802@onetel.com> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:27:55 +0100 From: Chris Whitehouse User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091212) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Demelier References: <4CA34965.3010509@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4CA34965.3010509@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Location of sensors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 20:28:09 -0000 David Demelier wrote: > Hello, > > I just wonder how to know the location of the sensors, I got a lot of > them on my HP Probook laptop : > I looked at something related to this last year. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-acpi/2009-March/005555.html has a set of sysctl commands to track the various thermal zones on my HP nc6320. You could try running them while doing various things to try to affect different areas, eg running sysutils/cpuburn. I didn't try to define all the sensors because my problem was different and I solved it. Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 20:55:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 274D010656A9 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 20:55:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (ns2.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D71AD8FC1D for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 20:55:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.3/rdb1) id o8TKrMs4003936; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:53:22 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:53:22 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi Message-ID: <201009292053.o8TKrMs4003936@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: talon@lpthe.jussieu.fr Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ld(1) cannot find entry symbol _start; X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 20:55:22 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Sep 29 05:50:13 2010 > Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 11:51:09 +0100 (BST) > From: Anton Shterenlikht > To: Michel Talon > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: ld(1) cannot find entry symbol _start; > > > > On Tue, 28 Sep 2010, Michel Talon wrote: > > > Paul B Mahol said: > > On 9/28/10, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > >>> I'm trying to learn the very basics of the > >>> compile - assemble - link process on FreeBSD. > >>> Please don't shoot me. > >> .... > >>> Then I try to link the object file into > >>> an executable: > >>> > >>> % ld tmp.o > >> > >> You are missing something in above command. > >> > > > > More precisely, if you run gcc -v on a C file you get someting like: > > /usr/bin/ld --eh-frame-hdr -V -dynamic-linker /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 > > /usr/lib/crt1.o /usr/lib/crti.o /usr/lib/crtbegin.o -L/usr/lib > > -L/usr/lib /var/tmp//cco5EINk.o -lgcc --as-needed -lgcc_s --no-as-needed > > -lc -lgcc --as-needed -lgcc_s --no-as-needed /usr/lib/crtend.o > > /usr/lib/crtn.o > > > > > > where the object file produced by compilation and assembling is > > /var/tmp//cco5EINk.o > > > > That is adds several other object files to your own in order to get > > an executable. > > > > In particular the start symbol, at which execution begins is in > > /usr/lib/crt1.o > > > > as you can see from > > niobe% nm /usr/lib/crt1.o > > w _DYNAMIC > > 00000000 D __progname > > U _fini > > U _init > > U _init_tls > > 00000000 T _start > > 00000020 t _start1 > > 00000000 r abitag > > U atexit > > 00000004 C environ > > U exit > > U main > > which shows that _start is defined here, (but not e.g. _init). On the > > other hand the function main() which is defined in your program is > > referred to but undefined here. > > thank you. Where can I read more on what each file is for: > > % ls -al /usr/lib/crt* > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 2552 Sep 15 13:52 /usr/lib/crt1.o > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 4656 Sep 15 13:53 /usr/lib/crtbegin.o > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 4936 Sep 15 13:53 /usr/lib/crtbeginS.o > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 4656 Sep 15 13:53 /usr/lib/crtbeginT.o > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 3648 Sep 15 13:53 /usr/lib/crtend.o > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 3648 Sep 15 13:53 /usr/lib/crtendS.o > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1928 Sep 15 13:52 /usr/lib/crti.o > -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1087 Sep 15 13:52 /usr/lib/crtn.o > > The sources for these files are in asm, so would be good > to read a more accessible introduction. Those routines set up the "run-time envrionment" that any UNIX c-language evironment expects. that's that the name 'crt' prefix means '-language un-ime' this involves a bunch of 'gory mechanical details' that *DON'T* really matter how they get accomplished, jus that they _do_ get done. This includes things like setting up the 'stack', and the 'heap', initializing the tables for the dynamic-memory management routines (malloc and friends), setting up 'stdin/stdout/stderr', and getting the command-line arguments processed so that they can be passed as 'argc', and 'argv' (also the 'environment', in 'envp') to your 'main()' program. > > Also, it seems only crt1, crti and crtn are provided > by FreeBSD itself (/usr/src/lib/csu/ia64), crtbegin and > crtend are under /usr/src/contrib/gcc/config/ia64/, > and sources for *S.o and *T.o I can't find at all. > So which of these are specific to GCC on FreeBSD, and > which aren't? "who cares?" applies. it is all simmply "required housekeeping" go bring the state of the current running process (i.e, the task/ address-space/etc) to what is defined as the 'initial state' for a c-language 'main()' program. > > For example if I use g95 compiler instead of gfortran45, > will the linker still need all above object files? If you use 'the compiler' to manage the linking process -- e.g. {compilername} -o {executable} {one-or-more-'object' .o file} the right files will be automatically included in the executable. 'crt0.o' is the classical program entry point -- it may or may not rely on other routines to get 'the environment' set up -- especially depending on what 'advanced' features the program uses.. If you use light-weight-process 'threads' (-lpthread) this may call for different crt0 code. Unless you are engaged in porting the compiler and O/S to a completely new hardware architecture, or trying to generate 'stand-alone' code, e.g. for an embedded processor tht runs witout _anuting called a 'cpu', you don't have any reason to worry about this housekeeping code. Its there, it works, and it does what it's supposed to. Oh yeah, if you tamper with it, you make it incompatible with the use of _any_ existing object files. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 20:56:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A7691065670 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 20:56:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from email1.allantgroup.com (email1.emsphone.com [199.67.51.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 213058FC24 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 20:56:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by email1.allantgroup.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id o8TKuMdY051955 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:56:22 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o8TKuMB4033729 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:56:22 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o8TKuLNi033728; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:56:21 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:56:21 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Martin McCormick Message-ID: <20100929205621.GC40148@dan.emsphone.com> References: <201009291859.o8TIxIne059686@dc.cis.okstate.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201009291859.o8TIxIne059686@dc.cis.okstate.edu> X-OS: FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96 at email1.allantgroup.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (email1.allantgroup.com [199.67.51.78]); Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:56:22 -0500 (CDT) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.45 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkg_config Version Numbers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 20:56:26 -0000 In the last episode (Sep 29), Martin McCormick said: > I built bind9.7.1 on a 64-bit FreeBSD system and then > did make package-recursive in order to produce a package that > can be installed on some other systems. After doing so, I get > the following warning on numerous other packages when I install > them. > > pkg_add: warning: package pkg_name' requires 'pkg-config-0.23_1', but > 'pkg-config-0.25' is installed > > This looks like it could be harmless enough as pkg-config-0.25 > is newer but I thought I would ask before creating any more > possible monsters. Is this something to fix or can I forget it? You can probably ignore it. Your build system had some out-of-date installed software, so your package has dependencies on software versions that don't exist on newer systems. Make sure that the binaries you're installing weren't linked with any out-of-date shared library versions, though. That'll cause runtime linker errors when you try and run affected commands. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 29 21:14:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CC301065673 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:14:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jon@radel.com) Received: from wave.radel.com (wave.radel.com [216.143.151.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 300E08FC08 for ; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:14:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wave.radel.com (CommuniGate Pro PIPE 4.1.6) with PIPE id 9849222; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:14:34 -0400 Received: from [192.168.43.221] (account jon@radel.com HELO braeburn.local) by wave.radel.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.6) with ESMTP-TLS id 9849215; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:14:27 -0400 Message-ID: <4CA3AC31.2060703@radel.com> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 17:14:25 -0400 From: Jon Radel User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20100928162839.GA32198@thought.org> <7B0DAD9C-ED75-4188-9407-F86F44C94F47@cwis.biz> <19639A29-A22D-474B-8CD6-E62D2A4CCB15@cwis.biz> <4CA2D921.2080402@ose.nl> <20100929202423.GB13004@thought.org> In-Reply-To: <20100929202423.GB13004@thought.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms090202070401090708060200" X-Radel.com-MailScanner-Information: Please contact Jon for more information X-Radel.com-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro CLI mailer X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Gary Kline Subject: Re: what is from [sic (wrong)] with this picture? -- Answer: It's Ubuntu, not FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:14:36 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms090202070401090708060200 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 9/29/10 4:24 PM, Gary Kline wrote: > Yes! changing the line in main.cf lets things get thru to my > server cleanly, thanks for the tip. I still don't understand > what's wrong with my DNS files. Hopefully, other folk on-list > will see what's messed up. Your domain registrar is having your dns delegated to 3 nameservers: thought.org. 86400 IN NS ns1.thought.org. thought.org. 86400 IN NS ns1.silvertree.org. thought.org. 86400 IN NS ns1.twisted4life.com. ;; Received 142 bytes from 2001:500:48::1#53(b2.org.afilias-nst.org) in=20 32 ms The last of the 3, ns1.twisted4life.com, is of the opinion that your=20 domain doesn't exist, given that it has no authoritative data and=20 refuses to do recursive lookups for the Internet at large. I would=20 suspect that this would result in the coming and going visibility that=20 others have reported. Basically, you don't exist a third of the time. You need to make sure that all the nameservers you list with your=20 registrar are actually admitting to your existence and are getting=20 up-to-date data. I recall having this conversation with you before. --=20 --Jon Radel jon@radel.com --------------ms090202070401090708060200-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 01:44:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03AE0106566C for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 01:44:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glarkin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail1.sourcehosting.net (113901-app1.sourcehosting.net [72.32.213.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1F408FC1A for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 01:44:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 68-189-245-235.dhcp.oxfr.ma.charter.com ([68.189.245.235] helo=cube.entropy.prv) by mail1.sourcehosting.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1P18CY-000B8U-Fc; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:44:55 -0400 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (fireball.entropy.prv [192.168.1.12]) by cube.entropy.prv (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19EE14579868; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:44:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4CA3EB8B.3050701@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 21:44:43 -0400 From: Greg Larkin Organization: The FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jon Radel References: <20100928162839.GA32198@thought.org> <7B0DAD9C-ED75-4188-9407-F86F44C94F47@cwis.biz> <19639A29-A22D-474B-8CD6-E62D2A4CCB15@cwis.biz> <4CA2D921.2080402@ose.nl> <20100929202423.GB13004@thought.org> <4CA3AC31.2060703@radel.com> In-Reply-To: <4CA3AC31.2060703@radel.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 OpenPGP: id=1C940290 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -0.3 (/) Cc: Gary Kline , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what is from [sic (wrong)] with this picture? -- Answer: It's Ubuntu, not FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: glarkin@FreeBSD.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 01:44:57 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Jon Radel wrote: > On 9/29/10 4:24 PM, Gary Kline wrote: >> Yes! changing the line in main.cf lets things get thru to my >> server cleanly, thanks for the tip. I still don't understand >> what's wrong with my DNS files. Hopefully, other folk on-list >> will see what's messed up. > > Your domain registrar is having your dns delegated to 3 nameservers: > > thought.org. 86400 IN NS ns1.thought.org. > thought.org. 86400 IN NS ns1.silvertree.org. > thought.org. 86400 IN NS ns1.twisted4life.com. > ;; Received 142 bytes from 2001:500:48::1#53(b2.org.afilias-nst.org) in > 32 ms > > The last of the 3, ns1.twisted4life.com, is of the opinion that your > domain doesn't exist, given that it has no authoritative data and > refuses to do recursive lookups for the Internet at large. I would > suspect that this would result in the coming and going visibility that > others have reported. Basically, you don't exist a third of the time. > > You need to make sure that all the nameservers you list with your > registrar are actually admitting to your existence and are getting > up-to-date data. I recall having this conversation with you before. > The first thing I would do is check the results of the DNS scan here (http://www.dnscog.com/report/thought.org) and fix all of the listed problems. Keep iterating until the report is clean, or at least doesn't have any red flags on it. I've used this service successfully for a while now to debug DNS problems. Hope that helps, Greg - -- Greg Larkin http://www.FreeBSD.org/ - The Power To Serve http://www.sourcehosting.net/ - Ready. Set. Code. http://twitter.com/sourcehosting/ - Follow me, follow you -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iD8DBQFMo+uL0sRouByUApARAlrCAJ9wOlsjn3he03B+dOwrexWYxwm8aQCgvaLx 2Dcr9cD1dzW0PuOyOGIUFfQ= =PM9u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 06:24:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1458106564A for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 06:24:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from krasi_e_d@yahoo.com) Received: from web32905.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web32905.mail.mud.yahoo.com [209.191.69.82]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A28F98FC17 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 06:24:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 54311 invoked by uid 60001); 30 Sep 2010 05:57:38 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1285826258; bh=0O03XU/VVGZREp0th1FldIxflJrFno4nGNQVngKNpJQ=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ZCDR3qfNZr1mKitkROJoVZBN1z61e85LvkFD7jZ7WQcopXaVEUopkbpVHTRaZ13PfFXWk6mvOBolxaUzlkAhHMWH7Ab3vy+3eGiTAwjCwbQsqzPcYD6T+ud14cCO3VjNr722LGwcG4xUeN0qgu905v9GHr9MnwMxL0EzmU+AnHM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=NysXSYcm2oWDRQ5h9MycJPn3o+GX2XBRRiFfIe1rLlHYVUoC5cHA8oGRxFY4eWxyjglDIFPlldT41vBY9hTWaA6lRYUjqsBktPtvKW1IK32joYsqNZ3jVa6STcZJ1hedG8tN9+ZTtVFjFvJWb9DpjTHGh7kGdTktm0pRmb7/SKY=; Message-ID: <680793.54090.qm@web32905.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 6bZEpwkVM1kuoJk2i1AJGiH0wiJDqRvH7QYnubzYNorst9D xP2u.FIKwIc4NtjTJ6MpcdR7aDC4MX3aTpjpBr0lcQCliEWq4DE9sc5.KaBf h.s2piPovMBr9zNoaRvq3BVVggym9pPiXf0RLQtzs8Uv4NX9TDWgXj8cFZSr PaCyPQMuNhceVpOtahfrIGXOUcKNreClTAAx7uVKocK338lt02OZKgKWjsZd KOp3JposMHtyxEiAMlW1Sk8KOvy5PWHuvDl5VrSzIkLtbW.Rkpcb90I5uzh8 EsglYoSLOqaxjZAtCjRT5f7wVP3eYVizdxhbxzaG3Ud8PFZ9.v_JuAZo- Received: from [178.16.129.6] by web32905.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 29 Sep 2010 22:57:38 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/497 YahooMailWebService/0.8.105.279950 Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2010 22:57:38 -0700 (PDT) From: Krasimir Dermendjiev To: questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 06:24:20 -0000 Hello, Everybody, I am new to FreeBSD and today I attempted to configure the gbde. I just supplemented the following line to the GENERIC kernel: options GEOM_BDE After reboot I saw that the sshd doesn't work.I cant use root or any user on the computer.I saw new line like sshd error:Bind to port 22 on 0.0.0.0 failed. I attempted all boot options like (default, ACPI disabled,Safe mode,single user mode,verbose prompt) to change the kernel configuration file. Because after the new line for GEOM_BDE my problems came. I'll be happy if some one find some time to answer with few instructions. Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 06:46:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 767A1106566B; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 06:46:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danger@FreeBSD.org) Received: from services.syscare.sk (services.syscare.sk [188.40.39.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34D3B8FC08; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 06:46:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from services.syscare.sk (services [188.40.39.36]) by services.syscare.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF6DB4968B; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 08:29:50 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at rulez.sk Received: from services.syscare.sk ([188.40.39.36]) by services.syscare.sk (services.rulez.sk [188.40.39.36]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dF2g5FRSnmbh; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 08:29:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from danger-mbp.local (59576.ba.3pp.slovanet.sk [84.16.39.226]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: danger@rulez.sk) by services.syscare.sk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9C8DA49680; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 08:29:48 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4CA42E5C.5090609@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 08:29:48 +0200 From: Daniel Gerzo Organization: The FreeBSD Project User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.10pre) Gecko/20100914 Lanikai/3.1.5pre MIME-Version: 1.0 To: current@freebsd.org, hackers@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: HEADSUP: Call for FreeBSD Status Reports - 3Q/2010 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 06:46:43 -0000 Dear all, I would like to remind you that the next round of status reports covering the third quarter of 2010 is due on October 15th, 2010. This initiative is very welcome in our community. Therefore, I would like to ask you to submit your status reports soon, so that we can compile the report on time. Do not hesitate and write us a few lines - a short description about what you are working on, what are your plans and goals, so we can inform our community about your great work! Check out the reports from the past to get some inspiration of what your submission should look like. If you know about a project that should be included in the status report, please let us know as well, so we can poke the responsible people to provide us with something useful. Updates to submissions from the last report are welcome too. Note that the submissions are accepted from anyone involved with the FreeBSD community, you do not have to be a FreeBSD committer. Submissions about anything related to FreeBSD are very welcome! Please email us the filled-in XML template which can be found at http://www.freebsd.org/news/status/report-sample.xml to monthly@FreeBSD.org, or alternatively use our web based form located at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/monthly.cgi. For more information, please visit http://www.freebsd.org/news/status/. We are looking forward to see your submissions! -- S pozdravom / Best regards Daniel Gerzo, FreeBSD committer From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 07:25:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F02B106564A for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 07:25:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from b.smeelen@ose.nl) Received: from mail.ose.nl (mail.ose.nl [212.178.134.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7D8B8FC13 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 07:24:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.ose.nl for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 09:24:58 +0200 Message-ID: <4CA43B4A.6030508@ose.nl> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 09:24:58 +0200 From: Bas Smeelen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <800348.43799.qm@web113901.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <246095.42115.qm@web113905.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4CA2E345.7070006@ose.nl> <20100929124230.00004796@unknown> <4CA333EC.40704@ose.nl> <20100929183657.13dfea89@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20100929183657.13dfea89@gumby.homeunix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Cache Memory in top command X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 07:25:00 -0000 On 09/29/2010 07=3A36 PM=2C RW wrote=3A =3E=3E=3E Bas Smeelen =3Cb=2Esmeelen=40ose=2Enl=3E wrote=3A =3E=3E=3E =3E=3E=3E =20 =3E=3E=3E=3E *Cache=3A* number of clean pages caching data that are availa= ble for =3E=3E=3E=3E immediate reallocation =3E=3E=3E=3E http=3A//www=2Efreebsd=2Eorg/cgi/man=2Ecgi=3Fquery=3Dtop=26sek= tion=3D1 =3E=3E=3E=3E =20 =3E=3E=3E=3E =20 =3E=3E=3E =3E I don=27t see why it would be included in wired=2C and I=27m pretty sur= e =3E that=27s wrong=2E=20 =3E =20 >From the man page=3A *Wired=3A* number of pages wired down=2C including cached file data pages= =3E The cache queue is a stock of clean pages=2C it=27s sort of an intermed= iate =3E state between inactive and free=2E Most memory allocations can be =3E performed directly from the cache queue=2C which allows memory to hold= =3E useful data right up to the moment it=27s reallocated=2C and it allows= =3E FreeBSD to run with very little free =28i=2Ee=2E wasted=29 memory=2E =3E =3E Cache memory is topped-up with memory from the inactive queue in the =3E background=2E Likewise inactive memory is topped-up from active memory= =2E =3E Since that=27s done on demand the values are virtually meaningless=2E= =20 =3E =3E =20 Thanks for your detailed explanation DISCLAIMER=3A This e-mail is for the intended recipient=28s=29 only=2E Acce= ss=2C disclosure=2C copying=2C distribution or reliance on any of it by anyone else is prohibited=2E If yo= u have received it by mistake please let us know by reply and then delete it from your system= =2E From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 08:15:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B9C11065679 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 08:15:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kayasaman@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3B828FC12 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 08:15:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwb17 with SMTP id 17so2212542wwb.31 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 01:15:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=B0jon7eRAlCUrrs+E7op85jr3Xv+XV2lhiCcKFNQ8yY=; b=xgXQxaQKcWPC6YiAwp645hhkRl5VyrchikDEqNMaLRu5mpAYBjxTfQ6dtsByxYvaxf IHicjSmRaiZTtOqMjs2n8yxD2Anl5ASMKZpXZnZJca4HUG++RXgl1jIPn0/2/BTFzOR7 OuHG7SRRRNLC/QzpQblhwg8BNg3CnH3sNh7Dk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=ZGp31c37j72Kvt0RWe0+c3TEX5DHbxAaqRXSHC9G/RBD8FCZtfc6rEoT+/RhZvAAYu 3jF4JJ+jB/omdxB6OPr8l8kSC3zy4TIxQJ3BCK8d+oOV/YQT5KHg8OQikUnPCRn9phuK 48J7uLCl6a0QFy4uff+ZumCzPuQaBAWKHiGJk= Received: by 10.227.69.134 with SMTP id z6mr2490103wbi.201.1285834547235; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 01:15:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.52] ([85.105.64.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g9sm8100183wbh.1.2010.09.30.01.15.44 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 30 Sep 2010 01:15:45 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CA4461F.6030508@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 11:11:11 +0300 From: Kaya Saman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100914 Thunderbird/3.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Mother board compatibility and CF card usage as main storage device for small DNS server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 08:15:49 -0000 Hi, I'm planning on using FreeBSD 8.0 x64 RELEASE edition for a small primary/secondary DNS server setup. The system will run Bind9 and have some zone files and views for the few people I host for. I am considering using a dual Atom system board with 2GB RAM and for storage was thinking of going for 16GB compact flash card instead of a normal hard disk...... This is a bit radical for me as I have never used this kind of setup before so I'm not sure how suited it will be??? These are the system boards: http://www.commell.com.tw/product/SBC/LV-67E.HTM# or http://www.globalamericaninc.com/p2808245/2808245_-_Mini-ITX_Motherboard_with_the_choice_of_Embedded_Intel_Atom_D510,_D410_or_Fanless_N450_Processor/product_info.html I mean for a DNS server (all be it a small one) is it wise to use compact flash as storage?? Thanks and regards, Kaya From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 09:14:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 107A71065670 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 09:14:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FE458FC1F for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 09:14:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o8U9EhZC093706; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:14:44 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:14:43 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Carmel In-Reply-To: <20100929205531.76F991065713@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20100930165112.D62022@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20100929205531.76F991065713@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW firewall and TCP ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 09:14:47 -0000 In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 330, Issue 5, Message: 1 On Wed, 29 Sep 2010 08:16:47 -0400 Carmel wrote: > While perusing my Apache httpd-error.log, I noticed a large number of > attempts to access my phpmyadmin directory, as well as a few less know > others. Most of these probes originated from China. Since I have no > legitimate business dealing with that region, I decided to create a > table in my IPFW firewall to block them. This is an example: > > ## IPFW Firewall Rules > > # Set rules command prefix > cmd="ipfw -q add" > > # public interface name of NIC facing the public Internet > pif="nfe0" > > # Lets start by listing known bad IP addresses and blocking them. We > # will put them into a table for easier handling. > > ipfw -q table 1 add 60.0.0.0/8 > ipfw -q table 1 add 61.0.0.0/8 Firstly, 60/8 and 61/8 include a lot more of the Asia Pacific region than China, including _some_ of the blocks allocated to Australia, New Zealand, Japan and many others. The days of associating /8 blocks with countries are long gone. For some scientific (and policy) rationale of the increasingly fragmented nature of new allocations down to /22 (ie 64 IP addresses) have a look at http://www.potaroo.net/tools/ipv4/ Secondly, there are _dozens_ more IP blocks including Chinese IP space. Thirdly, the script posted below to deal specifically with the issue you mention has caught lots of addresses in many other regions including some based or hosted in the USA; the notion that denying China or Europe or for that matter North America access will solve any problem is passe. But if you do want to go down that path, and have any concern to limit 'collateral damage' from parts of the planet you've nothing particular against, at least try to find accurate and complete data. This is not so easy, and needs to be updated frequently as IP4 address space nears exhaustion sometime before early 2012 (reference the link above). For example, if you used http://www.blockacountry.com/ and selected Australia, you'd see some 60.* and 61.* blocks mentioned above, but you =won't= find 115.70/16 there, ie the address this mail comes from! This was a problem when first allocated last year, mostly by people using out of date IP blocklists that assumed we were in China .. see the problem? But ignoring geopolitics or xenophobia and concentrating on technics .. > $cmd set 1 deny log all from table\(1\) to any in via $pif > > The above is the first entry in my "rules" file. I know that IPFW is > working since I have blocked other ports for other services and it has > worked correctly. > > The problem is that these IPs are not being blocked. I continue to see > them listed in the httpd-error.log. I have rebooted my machine and > therefore am quite certain that these rules are being loaded. A simple 'ipfw show' will likely show that rule not there, possibly a preexisting 'flush' rule comes after it? Or, are your other rules all in 'set 1'? Is 'set 1' your current set? The default is set 0. If you are using multiple sets use ipfw(8)'s -S switch to show disabled rules. > The problem is that I probably do not understand how to properly block > an IP or range of IPs from accessing my web server correctly. I would > really appreciate any assistance. Modulo a probable flush or set issue, your syntax is right, and tables are indeed the way to go; the larger the list, the faster tables work. So here's my script for dealing with this specific issue; I got tired of seeing over 150 requests from each IP of what is clearly a distributed bot scanning for */scripts/setup.php and more lately *p=phpinfo(); This usually blocks the offending IP before its second request. FWIW, the latest IP logged and blocked was from a hosting company in the US :) I run eg '# /path/to/botwatch 50 &' to start with the recent log lines. '# kill /var/run/botwatch.pid' stops it and both of its bg processes. cheers, Ian #!/bin/sh # botwatch smithi 23/7/10: pesky distribot seeking */scripts/setup.php # v0.7 4/9/10 extend for p=phpinfo() so any others watchlog=/usr/var/log/httpd-access.log # combined format: eg='1.2.3.4 - - [22/Jul/2010:22:40:47 +1000] "GET /pma/scripts/setup.php' table=1 # ipfw table denying any further access sleep=10 # max delay before killing pipeline blocking on 'tail -f' name=`basename $0` log=/var/log/${name}.log pid=/var/run/${name}.pid actions='GET POST HEAD' ournets='127.0.0 192.168.7 aa.bb.cc xxx.yy.zzz' # our local IP net/s blocklist='scripts/setup.php p=phpinfo();' [ "$1" ] && lines=$1 && shift || lines=1 [ "$1" ] && echo "usage: $name [lines]" && exit 1 [ -s $pid ] && op=`cat $pid` && [ "`ps ax | grep -w $op | grep $name`" ] \ && echo "`date` $name [$$] exit: [$op] still running" >>$log && exit 2 echo $$ >$pid echo "`date` $name [$$]: begin lines=$lines" >>$log tail -f -n$lines $watchlog | \ while read ip a b datime tz get url etc; do [ "$url" -a "${actions%${get#\"}*}" != "$actions" ] || continue [ "${ournets%${ip%.*}*}" = "$ournets" ] || continue # don't block me/24 for string in $blocklist; do if [ "${url%$string}" != $url ]; then blocked=`ipfw table $table list | awk '{print $1}' | grep $ip` if [ "$blocked" ]; then # eg startup $lines > 1 echo "`date` $blocked already blocked" >>$log else ipfw table $table add $ip `date "+%s"` 2>/dev/null echo "`date` blocked $ip seeking $string" >>$log fi fi done done & # ; bgpid=$! # two-process pipeline in bg quit=0; trap "quit=1" int quit term while [ $quit -eq 0 ]; do sleep $sleep; done trap - int quit term # kill tail, first proc in pipeline; $bgpid is of last proc, no use here tailpid=`ps ax | grep "[t]ail -f" | grep "$watchlog" | awk '{print $1}'` [ "$tailpid" ] && kill -TERM $tailpid && sleep 1 \ || echo "`date` exit tailpid='$tailpid' ?" >>$log echo "`date` $name [$$]: end (terminated)" >>$log rm $pid exit 0 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 09:40:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 811B61065673 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 09:40:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E51378FC0A for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 09:40:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o8U9e2Ki095171; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:40:02 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:40:02 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Carmel In-Reply-To: <20100930165112.D62022@sola.nimnet.asn.au> Message-ID: <20100930193436.N62022@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20100929205531.76F991065713@hub.freebsd.org> <20100930165112.D62022@sola.nimnet.asn.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: IPFW firewall and TCP ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 09:40:04 -0000 On Thu, 30 Sep 2010, Ian Smith wrote: > countries are long gone. For some scientific (and policy) rationale of > the increasingly fragmented nature of new allocations down to /22 (ie 64 > IP addresses) have a look at http://www.potaroo.net/tools/ipv4/ Oops; a /22 allocation is of course 4 times a /24, ~1024 addresses. Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 10:31:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE489106564A for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 10:31:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nr1c0re@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F0C98FC12 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 10:31:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gyg4 with SMTP id 4so812187gyg.13 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 03:31:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=kTA03UMQZzJmpXdHFwE/TDhYRFxpifRH9S0WTXLHhsk=; b=ux6E/JCmBxeYKuXWxdJwc5D0YGKI8+dwG1FIsmADa1ryRdKhMElo54R3buwM/Yccsd HihJZ9yfSqyj64RlXEYVuOLY//tWsz2xR41hpxtE81OTBpZKv6r9WPKZ/MLu4rth9PuB EciDp10QWkkrtRo/y90dXZEeUeL1wEwysbiyA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=xFvEjYYebsuxxJ/jAaWOkWqyL06a4QAQyDUinT1yPYoBT73/XCflsufoKlX33wDqht Lxk71b+M5XpGTtikwddhMEVweAonlTYz3TuUNIpkwHDaruqkF5xKTgRGBVQ9ld61FS4n Gfnrn02J98LLRbSI0hPZo6JS6gILfKveojwCs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.3.21 with SMTP id 21mr2298799qal.337.1285842704706; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 03:31:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.214.142 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 03:31:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:31:44 +0400 Message-ID: From: c0re To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: /usr/ports via NFS on several servers adn parralell portupgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 10:31:45 -0000 Hello all! I found one problem using portupgrade on a number of servers, that has NFS mounter /usr/ports from one server. On one server portupgrade sometimes want to rebuild /usr/ports/INDEX-7.db. While it rebuilds, another portupgrade running on second server suddenly wants to rebuild INDEX-7.db. And both portupgrades fails with this message: ............... /usr/ports/INDEX-7:17502:read: 0x2a75d37c, 1024: Stale NFS file handle -- Stale NFS file handle /usr/ports/INDEX-7:17503:read: 0x2a75d37c, 1024: Stale NFS file handle -- Stale NFS file handle /usr/ports/INDEX-7:17504:read: 0x2a75d37c, 1024: Stale NFS file handle -- Stale NFS file handle /usr/ports/INDEX-7:17505:read: 0x2a75d37c, 1024: Stale NFS file handle -- Stale NFS file handle /usr/ports/INDEX-7:17506:read: 0x2a75d37c, 1024: Stale NFS file handle -- Stale NFS file handle /usr/ports/INDEX-7:17507:read: 0x2a75d37c, 1024: Stale NFS file handle -- Stale NFS file handle /usr/ports/INDEX-7:17508:read: 0x2a75d37c, 1024: Stale NFS file handle -- Stale NFS file handle /usr/ports/INDEX-7:17509:read: 0x2a75d37c, 1024: Stale NFS file handle -- Stale NFS file handle .............. How ti use portupgrade with /usr/ports right? I set WRKDIRPREFIX=/tmp/workdir in make.conf. May be I can do something else to allow several portupgrade processes on several servers that has mounted nfs from one server? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 11:37:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93BA91065672 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 11:37:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03AA98FC12 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 11:37:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb33 with SMTP id 33so16163wyb.13 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 04:37:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=wE2S0J2KjnEOKj/bMErDjtkvJuY4jhY2vXgXQxwg/yQ=; b=Ud2yO7puGHIAOl6pfYuIUR85LRzLulRYfgHIls8Ug86uW5ZtQI7H0lgusVn1S2sr47 nzPfXQ7BSZDV5D0cfV2D/m4170xIltDhOt2vhALJhFsxfyC/rPIEUgKcGxwB2SEWSyAj WYIs6qOBegJZcT1mmnnmyWETKK6o1Ax0oNmi0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=x0eJ1KvqjQlEMlMzrJVN7oySE0INIz1VnNdZzR2ORcgLDikSclVzfKNlHBZjx2owt/ PpHrJuRKlrdHXc8e198tPOQUJthi5girDblIZudDZqjhtz0BfdLFnILo5BMxiRmAqI2s wBeZ0nErhfAPKnsvAWyzqEE4nEtr9DaWo58M8= Received: by 10.227.69.134 with SMTP id z6mr2749082wbi.201.1285846660476; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 04:37:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p45sm6230338weq.21.2010.09.30.04.37.38 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 30 Sep 2010 04:37:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:37:35 +0100 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100930123735.3a2870b2@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <4CA43B4A.6030508@ose.nl> References: <800348.43799.qm@web113901.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <246095.42115.qm@web113905.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4CA2E345.7070006@ose.nl> <20100929124230.00004796@unknown> <4CA333EC.40704@ose.nl> <20100929183657.13dfea89@gumby.homeunix.com> <4CA43B4A.6030508@ose.nl> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Cache Memory in top command X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 11:37:44 -0000 On Thu, 30 Sep 2010 09:24:58 +0200 Bas Smeelen wrote: > *Wired:* number of pages wired down, including cached file data pages That refers to buffer pages (displayed as Buf), which are a subset of the cached file data pages. The pages in the cache queue are not specifically cached file data pages, they are clean pages from any source, including pages that have been written to swap. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 12:45:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44243106566B for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:45:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from b.smeelen@ose.nl) Received: from mail.ose.nl (mail.ose.nl [212.178.134.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6D4D8FC0A for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:44:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.ose.nl for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:44:56 +0200 Message-ID: <4CA48649.8090605@ose.nl> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:44:57 +0200 From: Bas Smeelen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <800348.43799.qm@web113901.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <246095.42115.qm@web113905.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> <4CA2E345.7070006@ose.nl> <20100929124230.00004796@unknown> <4CA333EC.40704@ose.nl> <20100929183657.13dfea89@gumby.homeunix.com> <4CA43B4A.6030508@ose.nl> <20100930123735.3a2870b2@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20100930123735.3a2870b2@gumby.homeunix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Cache Memory in top command X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:45:00 -0000 On 09/30/2010 01=3A37 PM=2C RW wrote=3A =3E On Thu=2C 30 Sep 2010 09=3A24=3A58 +0200 =3E Bas Smeelen =3Cb=2Esmeelen=40ose=2Enl=3E wrote=3A =3E =3E =3E =20 =3E=3E *Wired=3A* number of pages wired down=2C including cached file data= pages =3E=3E =20 =3E That refers to buffer pages =28displayed as Buf=29=2C which are a subse= t of =3E the cached file data pages=2E =3E =3E The pages in the cache queue are not specifically cached file data =3E pages=2C they are clean pages from any source=2C including pages that h= ave =3E been written to swap=2E Could this be a =22bug=22 in the man page then=3F Because Wired en Buff are explicitly explained at the bottom of man =281=29= top DISCLAIMER=3A This e-mail is for the intended recipient=28s=29 only=2E Acce= ss=2C disclosure=2C copying=2C distribution or reliance on any of it by anyone else is prohibited=2E If yo= u have received it by mistake please let us know by reply and then delete it from your system= =2E From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 14:18:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACD431065693 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:18:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from seklecki@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us) Received: from mx04.pub.collaborativefusion.com (mx04.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.72.84]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E9738FC0A for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:18:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([206.210.89.202]) by mx04.pub.collaborativefusion.com (StrongMail Enterprise 4.1.1.4(4.1.1.4-47689)); Thu, 30 Sep 2010 09:41:33 -0400 X-VirtualServerGroup: Default X-MailingID: 00000::00000::00000::00000::::3337 X-SMHeaderMap: mid="X-MailingID" X-Destination-ID: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-SMFBL: ZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmc= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us; s=noc_cfi_pgh_pa_us_key_dkim; l=1025; t=1285854093; i=@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us; h=Message-ID:Date:From: Reply-To:Organization:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:CC:Subject: References:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; bh=gPmkwYbl4hTixIegLo9NEIc8YPY=; b=fs0JQ5TZ2si1gGagdJnYwXEcj9z5/ /0bBwpG4qkUXzf1LRYCICVTvsB1AXAXaKmz8OJgR7bqZNRCtum3Vf5ZSIl+v9K+k hnDGMPg+jRj3w4qZqky2GFplqyMPqpqFxbi Message-ID: <4CA4988E.2000200@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 10:02:54 -0400 From: "Brian A. Seklecki (CFI NOC)" Organization: Collaborative Fusion, Inc. (DRP NOC) User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kaya Saman References: <4CA4461F.6030508@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4CA4461F.6030508@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mother board compatibility and CF card usage as main storage device for small DNS server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bseklecki@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:18:17 -0000 On 9/30/2010 4:11 AM, Kaya Saman wrote: > I mean for a DNS server (all be it a small one) is it wise to use > compact flash as storage?? For our GSLB DNS Slaves, we boot embedded/low power (or even VMs these days) systems with CF images off of flash, keep a shadow copy of /etc around, and program all file systems with R/W activity (/var/chroot/named/cache, where all zone files are fetched from Master NS) on MFS partitions, eliminating almost all write operations to the CF card. No swap, and RD / (/var, etc.) and MFS /usr extracted from a tarball via modified rc(8). /shadow is mounted noatime. Minimal writes to flash. The systems boot in about 30 seconds. We actually run NetBSD, but we've done similar models on FreeBSD. No CF card failures reported in five (5) years. We use Transcend Industrial series. Where it gets risky is if you just plain install a live functional FreeBSD on CF. A million inodes for /usr/src and CF is about as fast as an ESDI hard drive in an IBM XT. ~BAS From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 14:35:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75C24106564A for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:35:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kayasaman@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com (mail-wy0-f172.google.com [74.125.82.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 069B78FC08 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:35:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyi11 with SMTP id 11so3054563wyi.17 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 07:35:19 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RYWAjcskaOwXRMj0Ud6KbxFXeNssxXGTFv+F1LW9aUc=; b=RBR1YikzT+aXcgdil4S2n/GD4da9CFPNg+f0W6LqvKIwzRI610SWcZD3Ax/534EStC dwm+wPmqTaWG2kAHKk0B36uuotjUmvlOXXLH/5AIaqpTpYBoxiG/jRcaO91n7I5z4g88 yujN2Um4nuziV3F32Nk9l3DyDIUWsjB4qmvYY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=AJOIgD54gy9TMORHdj2EPokqE9YY1+Vw6mAnTfibCgCK9vhvY8sGGvCuZ0nHQVElBV qlPeRqSMtqbHM48wMyh5cNxKz1Y92oagdPzbJxBxfdmA1qVK4kWssDs2GwLGRcO8ejP6 AZx8tNwh25FssPSC8APJQiAcM4bW6jy2N0lCA= Received: by 10.227.208.73 with SMTP id gb9mr3452263wbb.13.1285857317541; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 07:35:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.52] ([85.105.64.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h29sm1835809wbc.21.2010.09.30.07.35.14 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 30 Sep 2010 07:35:15 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CA49F10.90603@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 17:30:40 +0300 From: Kaya Saman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100914 Thunderbird/3.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bseklecki@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us References: <4CA4461F.6030508@gmail.com> <4CA4988E.2000200@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us> In-Reply-To: <4CA4988E.2000200@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mother board compatibility and CF card usage as main storage device for small DNS server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:35:20 -0000 Thanks very much Brian: On 30/09/2010 17:02, Brian A. Seklecki (CFI NOC) wrote: > On 9/30/2010 4:11 AM, Kaya Saman wrote: >> I mean for a DNS server (all be it a small one) is it wise to use >> compact flash as storage?? > > > For our GSLB DNS Slaves, we boot embedded/low power (or even VMs these > days) systems with CF images off of flash, keep a shadow copy of /etc > around, and program all file systems with R/W activity > (/var/chroot/named/cache, where all zone files are fetched from Master > NS) on MFS partitions, eliminating almost all write operations to the > CF card. > > No swap, and RD / (/var, etc.) and MFS /usr extracted from a tarball > via modified rc(8). /shadow is mounted noatime. Are you saying that you custom compiled the kernel here?? I'm not that advanced with FreeBSD yet as I've only been using it for a few months even though I have other UNIX based experience. > > [...] > > Where it gets risky is if you just plain install a live functional > FreeBSD on CF. A million inodes for /usr/src and CF is about as fast > as an ESDI hard drive in an IBM XT. I was planning to go Standard Minimal Install then build Bind9 from ports and of course use SSH as login system and perhaps hack out the Serial port to give me some SPARC/POWER/Cisco style RS232c login. From what you mention it sounds like a bad idea as the system disk will have many R/W's going through it it seems as /tmp and Swap get written to all the time. I mean this would have been a cheaper alternative to buying an SSD drive or SAS 2.5" drive but now I'm a bit worried..... > > ~BAS > > Regards, Kaya From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 14:59:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF5031065670 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:59:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kayasaman@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EED38FC19 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:59:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwb17 with SMTP id 17so2662798wwb.31 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 07:59:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=7GdY/rdr9jpmfylfrfGIca71+pCnH6YPWHUodxoywZs=; b=M46z3so05b8T0mk++2XbRZX0829aSmALQjnQroMEbMJdI02ei8Ra8MyBa0ve774uJW SHpT8NjCkyDr/40egAI3VfZrEnJu4Qu0JsUuOju3rDj9xWRRpo63/plEgq3CDPe4I0hX URvlOlKBljHHKgkO4luKI9VUL7w0wJvV0qFak= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Qek5WXBRAB4I93uYKEGo/aezRKcylibh1PBcYfAtx7LT1AW7jzAXf74nY/FreY80R9 AeENJ1hYXT/lxY1uo5L2CqRxnOW6LsX5WN4RyHiPJEuYlrAg4vQNbuW5qt8TPSJ4GkZm /dGJ9xuqKCMWKxbQEE3tDWLAvO1J+ETCxArg0= Received: by 10.227.134.194 with SMTP id k2mr3316934wbt.86.1285858773325; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 07:59:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.52] ([85.105.64.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h29sm1857101wbc.9.2010.09.30.07.59.29 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 30 Sep 2010 07:59:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CA4A4B8.6020509@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 17:54:48 +0300 From: Kaya Saman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100914 Thunderbird/3.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brent Bloxam References: <4CA4461F.6030508@gmail.com> <4CA4988E.2000200@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us> <4CA49F10.90603@gmail.com> <4CA4A4A0.1000007@beanfield.com> In-Reply-To: <4CA4A4A0.1000007@beanfield.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mother board compatibility and CF card usage as main storage device for small DNS server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:59:35 -0000 On 30/09/2010 17:54, Brent Bloxam wrote: > Kaya Saman wrote: >> From what you mention it sounds like a bad idea as the system disk >> will have many R/W's going through it it seems as /tmp and Swap get >> written to all the time. >> > > You can skip swap altogether and use MFS (memory filesystem) like > Brian mentioned for other high write partitions that don't need to be > persistent (/tmp, /var/log). See the following article on the > freebsd.org website about using solid state storage: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/solid-state/article.html > > Keep in mind though that Brian's setup was for slave nameservers that > would be caching from another master. If your nameserver is acting as > master, you'll be storing your records on flash since you need > persistent storage, but I don't imagine those files will be write > intensive. > > Also, if you make /var/log MFS, you'll want to have an external syslog > server set up ;) Thanks a lot so it should be ok then! :-) Yeah sounds like a good setup, and also a syslog server :-)))) this is exactly what I need in order to check my IOS logs coming from my Cisco boxes. I had previously imagined it to be a simple tftpboot server but sounds like it's standalone. That's cool! I mean I really like having logwatch mailing me all necessary information anyway so that coupled with a syslog server should be pretty good :-) Nice ideas need to do some Google'ing now as I don't know what MFS is yet but I will.... :-D Cheers and best regards, Kaya From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 15:10:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 389941065674 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:10:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brent@beanfield.com) Received: from smtp03.beanfield.com (smtp02.beanfield.com [76.9.193.171]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C8A88FC1C for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:10:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Status: No X-beanfield-mta02-MailScanner-From: brent@beanfield.com X-beanfield-mta02-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-0.707, required 6, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00, BAYES_05 -0.50, RDNS_NONE 0.79) X-beanfield-mta02-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-beanfield-mta02-MailScanner-ID: 1P1KWe-0005uv-NC Received: from [66.207.193.249] (helo=Brent-Bloxams-Mac-mini.local) by mta02.beanfield.com with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P1KWe-0005uv-NC; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 10:54:24 -0400 Message-ID: <4CA4A4A0.1000007@beanfield.com> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 10:54:24 -0400 From: Brent Bloxam Organization: Beanfield Technologies User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Macintosh/20100228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kaya Saman References: <4CA4461F.6030508@gmail.com> <4CA4988E.2000200@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us> <4CA49F10.90603@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4CA49F10.90603@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mother board compatibility and CF card usage as main storage device for small DNS server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:10:06 -0000 Kaya Saman wrote: > From what you mention it sounds like a bad idea as the system disk will > have many R/W's going through it it seems as /tmp and Swap get written > to all the time. > You can skip swap altogether and use MFS (memory filesystem) like Brian mentioned for other high write partitions that don't need to be persistent (/tmp, /var/log). See the following article on the freebsd.org website about using solid state storage: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/solid-state/article.html Keep in mind though that Brian's setup was for slave nameservers that would be caching from another master. If your nameserver is acting as master, you'll be storing your records on flash since you need persistent storage, but I don't imagine those files will be write intensive. Also, if you make /var/log MFS, you'll want to have an external syslog server set up ;) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 15:19:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 015CA106566C for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:19:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvidican@m2.vidican.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82E568FC1E for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:19:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb29 with SMTP id 29so247810wyb.13 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 08:19:40 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.155.143 with SMTP id s15mr3196560wbw.154.1285859979773; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 08:19:39 -0700 (PDT) Sender: nvidican@m2.vidican.com Received: by 10.216.184.212 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 08:19:39 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [136.1.1.105] In-Reply-To: <4CA4A4B8.6020509@gmail.com> References: <4CA4461F.6030508@gmail.com> <4CA4988E.2000200@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us> <4CA49F10.90603@gmail.com> <4CA4A4A0.1000007@beanfield.com> <4CA4A4B8.6020509@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 11:19:39 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 6AqUwexie9tISmOKTpo6MCabqD4 Message-ID: From: Nathan Vidican To: Kaya Saman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Brent Bloxam , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mother board compatibility and CF card usage as main storage device for small DNS server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:19:42 -0000 MFS == memory filesystem; aka ram-disk. The problem being that on reboot, MFS looses all its contents, therefore practices like storing the 'startup' state for a filesystem in an archive (tar file works well) and mounting/copying on startup works well. Conversely, if you need to modify that startup state you can just over-write the tarfile again. On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Kaya Saman wrote: > On 30/09/2010 17:54, Brent Bloxam wrote: > >> Kaya Saman wrote: >> >>> From what you mention it sounds like a bad idea as the system disk will >>> have many R/W's going through it it seems as /tmp and Swap get written to >>> all the time. >>> >>> >> You can skip swap altogether and use MFS (memory filesystem) like Brian >> mentioned for other high write partitions that don't need to be persistent >> (/tmp, /var/log). See the following article on the freebsd.org website >> about using solid state storage: >> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/solid-state/article.html >> >> Keep in mind though that Brian's setup was for slave nameservers that >> would be caching from another master. If your nameserver is acting as >> master, you'll be storing your records on flash since you need persistent >> storage, but I don't imagine those files will be write intensive. >> >> Also, if you make /var/log MFS, you'll want to have an external syslog >> server set up ;) >> > > Thanks a lot so it should be ok then! :-) > > Yeah sounds like a good setup, and also a syslog server :-)))) this is > exactly what I need in order to check my IOS logs coming from my Cisco > boxes. I had previously imagined it to be a simple tftpboot server but > sounds like it's standalone. > > That's cool! I mean I really like having logwatch mailing me all necessary > information anyway so that coupled with a syslog server should be pretty > good :-) > > Nice ideas need to do some Google'ing now as I don't know what MFS is yet > but I will.... :-D > > Cheers and best regards, > > > Kaya > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Nathan Vidican nathan@vidican.com (519) 962-9987 (Canada) (313) 586-1982 (USA) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 15:24:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C87C5106566C for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:24:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83E3B8FC08 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:24:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsc.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.41]) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P1L07-0007PR-66 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:24:51 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncsc.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1P1L07-0001HL-36 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:24:51 +0100 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o8UFOoAR091248 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:24:50 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o8UFOoN6091247 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:24:50 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:24:50 +0100 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20100930152450.GA91136@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: pgt driver for Intersil PRISM ISL3890 cardbus wireless? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:24:52 -0000 I've this wireless cardbus card: none2@pci0:3:0:0: class=0x028000 card=0x00001260 chip=0x38901260 rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Intersil Americas Inc (Was: Harris Semiconductor)' device = 'PRISM GT 802.11g 54Mbps Wireless Controller (ISL3890)' class = network I can't seem to find a driver for it. This page http://www.openbsd.org/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=pgt suggests that pgt driver supports it. It claims the driver was ported to OBSD from FBSD, os it probably existed at some point? Perhaps it was removed at some point. I can't trace it. Can anybody suggest another driver which might support this card? many thanks anton -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 15:51:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5A611065670 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:51:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AFCB8FC1C for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:51:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk8 with SMTP id 8so1048965gxk.13 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 08:51:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=eNOxYkGAfLTaTuKSmYRd5loiWbailG0iKlDv+iXl5u8=; b=CJ8H4tWHrVkP6ti2In7kICvA2P7gfQ9i/KE4j0csfFzP7hBvLShpDkCBL7L1393pTS C5Q5lJA8ulRWBVINiA1U+uQjA8QFIQMBwtNpqspaE4l8XR0fbMEyjZ7bAGwCShUKFiH1 ZWFtnqSHHI01o5j7BFd8/E0nxR246dG4a8IgA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=eNE2hve0AnKtCa3o5oBktyUGa2nlYC5oAz32nYLFefH5+V2jNQ9aTYHH+JTuicMSDY lOloihJMuzXa6nN8xkORpSciEAj9/EXCvM7d0UOA5kdCPoonkyV2r22EoHWI+FytsgL3 7rAQ7iINh7674dpr9mL8vviosuIHbSli2FNSY= Received: by 10.231.157.212 with SMTP id c20mr3887102ibx.186.1285861852964; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 08:50:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.200.145 with HTTP; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 08:50:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Odhiambo Washington Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:50:22 +0300 Message-ID: To: User Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Upgrading autoconf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:51:11 -0000 I am trying this out: #portupgrade -f 'autoconf*' 'automake*' and I end up with: ===> Building for autoconf-2.67 gmake all-recursive gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/devel/autoconf267/work/autoconf-2.67' Making all in bin gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/devel/autoconf267/work/autoconf-2.67/bin' rm -f autom4te autom4te.tmp srcdir=''; \ test -f ./autom4te.in || srcdir=./; \ sed -e 's|@SHELL[@]|/bin/sh|g' -e 's|@PERL[@]|/usr/bin/perl|g' -e 's|@PERL_FLOCK[@]|yes|g' -e 's|@bindir[@]|/usr/local/bin|g' -e 's|@pk gdatadir[@]|/usr/local/share/autoconf-2.67|g' -e 's|@prefix[@]|/usr/local|g' -e 's|@autoconf-name[@]|'`echo autoconf | sed 's&$&-2.67&'`'|g' -e ' s|@autoheader-name[@]|'`echo autoheader | sed 's&$&-2.67&'`'|g' -e 's|@autom4te-name[@]|'`echo autom4te | sed 's&$&-2.67&'`'|g' -e 's|@M4[@]|/usr /local/bin/gm4|g' -e 's|@M4_DEBUGFILE[@]|--error-output|g' -e 's|@M4_GNU[@]||g' -e 's|@AWK[@]|/usr/bin/awk|g' -e 's|@RELEASE_YEAR[@]|'`sed 's/^\( [0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]\).*/\1/;q' ../ChangeLog`'|g' -e 's|@VERSION[@]|2.67|g' -e 's|@PACKAGE_NAME[@]|GNU Autoconf|g' -e 's|@configure_input[@]|Gene rated from autom4te.in; do not edit by hand.|g' ${srcdir}autom4te.in>autom4te.tmp chmod +x autom4te.tmp chmod a-w autom4te.tmp mv autom4te.tmp autom4te cd ../lib && gmake autom4te.cfg gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/devel/autoconf267/work/autoconf-2.67/lib' rm -f autom4te.cfg autom4te.tmp sed -e 's|@SHELL[@]|/bin/sh|g' -e 's|@PERL[@]|/usr/bin/perl|g' -e 's|@bindir[@]|/usr/local/bin|g' -e 's|@pkgdatadir[@]|/usr/local/share/autoconf- 2.67|g' -e 's|@prefix[@]|/usr/local|g' -e 's|@autoconf-name[@]|'`echo autoconf | sed 's&$&-2.67&'`'|g' -e 's|@autoheader-name[@]|'`echo autoheade r | sed 's&$&-2.67&'`'|g' -e 's|@autom4te-name[@]|'`echo autom4te | sed 's&$&-2.67&'`'|g' -e 's|@M4[@]|/usr/local/bin/gm4|g' -e 's|@AWK[@]|/usr/b in/awk|g' -e 's|@VERSION[@]|2.67|g' -e 's|@PACKAGE_NAME[@]|GNU Autoconf|g' ./autom4te.in >autom4te.tmp chmod a-w autom4te.tmp mv autom4te.tmp autom4te.cfg gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/devel/autoconf267/work/autoconf-2.67/lib' cd ../lib/m4sugar && gmake version.m4 gmake[3]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/devel/autoconf267/work/autoconf-2.67/lib/m4sugar' :;{ \ echo '# This file is part of -*- Autoconf -*-.' && \ echo '# Version of Autoconf.' && \ echo '# Copyright (C) 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2006, 2007, 2009' && \ echo '# Free Software Foundation, Inc.' && \ echo &&\ echo 'm4_define([m4_PACKAGE_NAME], [GNU Autoconf])' && \ echo 'm4_define([m4_PACKAGE_TARNAME], [autoconf])' && \ echo 'm4_define([m4_PACKAGE_VERSION], [2.67])' && \ echo 'm4_define([m4_PACKAGE_STRING], [GNU Autoconf 2.67])' && \ echo 'm4_define([m4_PACKAGE_BUGREPORT], [bug-autoconf@gnu.org])' && \ echo 'm4_define([m4_PACKAGE_URL], [ http://www.gnu.org/software/autoconf/])' && \ echo 'm4_define([m4_PACKAGE_YEAR], ['`sed 's/^\([0-9][0-9][0-9][0-9]\).*/\1/;q' ../../ChangeLog`'])'; \ } > version.m4-t mv version.m4-t version.m4 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/devel/autoconf267/work/autoconf-2.67/lib/m4sugar' autom4te_perllibdir='..'/lib AUTOM4TE_CFG='../lib/autom4te.cfg' ../bin/autom4te -B '..'/lib -B '..'/lib --language M4sh --cache ' ' --melt ./autoconf.as -o autoconf.in autoconf.as:1: /usr/local/bin/gm4: Warning: Excess arguments to built-in `_m4_popdef' ignored autom4te: /usr/local/bin/gm4 failed with exit status: 1 gmake[2]: *** [autoconf.in] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/devel/autoconf267/work/autoconf-2.67/bin' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/devel/autoconf267/work/autoconf-2.67' gmake: *** [all] Error 2 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/autoconf267. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade.11621.2 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade UPGRADE_PORT=autoconf-2.62 UPGRADE_POR T_VER=2.62 make ** Fix the problem and try again. ---> Skipping 'devel/automake19' (automake-1.9.6_3) because a requisite package 'autoconf-2.62' (devel/autoconf267) failed (specify -k to force) ** Package 'automake' has been removed from ports tree. ---> Skipping 'devel/automake19' (automake-1.9.6) because it has already been skipped ** Listing the failed packages (*:skipped / !:failed) ! devel/autoconf267 (autoconf-2.62) (unknown build error) * devel/automake19 (automake-1.9.6_3) * devel/automake19 (automake-1.9.6) ---> Packages processed: 2 done, 1 ignored, 2 skipped and 1 failed -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ "If you have nothing good to say about someone, just shut up!." -- Lucky Dube From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 15:59:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC289106566B for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:59:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@slightlystrange.org) Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org (cpc2-cmbg1-0-0-cust385.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com [82.21.105.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94FEA8FC1F for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:59:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dan by catflap.slightlystrange.org with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1P1LXP-0004ex-92 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:59:15 +0100 Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 16:59:15 +0100 From: Daniel Bye To: User Questions Message-ID: <20100930155915.GA26665@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: User Questions References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-PGP-Fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE amd64 Sender: Daniel Bye Subject: Re: Upgrading autoconf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:59:17 -0000 --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 06:50:22PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > I am trying this out: >=20 > #portupgrade -f 'autoconf*' 'automake*' Try upgrading the failing ports by hand. portupgrade tends to suppress full error output, making it difficult to ascertain exactly what's gone wrong. Alternatively, I would be tempted to just uninstall autoconf* and automake*, since they will get pulled in as dependencies whenever you come to build another port that requires them. Dan --=20 Daniel Bye _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkyks9MACgkQixf5fBYiFmpvIgCeIjqpzNS3z5Efq89xZg+mX4XB MQwAn2df3AWS56btUPRm4Hlw0RKcBmT9 =t16C -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qMm9M+Fa2AknHoGS-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 18:34:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C59011065675 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:34:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [65.122.17.41]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 836938FC21 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:34:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost.watson.org [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o8UIY1ir064553; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:34:01 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by fledge.watson.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id o8UIY0km064549; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:34:01 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from doug@fledge.watson.org) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:34:00 -0400 (EDT) From: doug To: Gary Kline In-Reply-To: <20100929172346.GA49250@thought.org> Message-ID: References: <20100929172346.GA49250@thought.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.3 (fledge.watson.org [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 30 Sep 2010 14:34:02 -0400 (EDT) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: pondering my DNS config.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: doug@safeport.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 18:34:03 -0000 On Wed, 29 Sep 2010, Gary Kline wrote: > > I spent hours yesterday checking around my named/DNS files. I thing the guy who rewrote how I _had_ things set up, messup. pinging ns1.thought.org is void. > It is plato.thought.org that is my pfSense server that might better be my primary nameserver. > > (Still testing mail; waiting for a response from freebsd-test to show up > on thought.org.) > > -- > Gary Kline Seattle BSD Users' Group (seabug) | kline@magnesium.net > Thought Unlimited Org's Alternate Email Site > http://www.magnesium.net/~kline > To live is not a necessity; but to live honorably...is a necessity. -Kant > The problem lies with the nameservers for thought.org. This is really not a thread that belongs on questions, if you are still having problems email me off list at doug at safeport.com and I will help you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 19:29:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD9A0106566C for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:29:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F13C48FC1A for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:29:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by thought.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id EF527E80809; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:29:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:29:05 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Jon Radel Message-ID: <20100930192905.GB15259@thought.org> References: <20100928162839.GA32198@thought.org> <7B0DAD9C-ED75-4188-9407-F86F44C94F47@cwis.biz> <19639A29-A22D-474B-8CD6-E62D2A4CCB15@cwis.biz> <4CA2D921.2080402@ose.nl> <20100929202423.GB13004@thought.org> <4CA3AC31.2060703@radel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CA3AC31.2060703@radel.com> X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 24 years of service to the Unix community. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: what is from [sic (wrong)] with this picture? -- Answer: It's Ubuntu, not FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:29:02 -0000 On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 05:14:25PM -0400, Jon Radel wrote: > On 9/29/10 4:24 PM, Gary Kline wrote: > > Yes! changing the line in main.cf lets things get thru to my > > server cleanly, thanks for the tip. I still don't understand > > what's wrong with my DNS files. Hopefully, other folk on-list > > will see what's messed up. > > Your domain registrar is having your dns delegated to 3 nameservers: > > thought.org. 86400 IN NS ns1.thought.org. > thought.org. 86400 IN NS ns1.silvertree.org. > thought.org. 86400 IN NS ns1.twisted4life.com. > ;; Received 142 bytes from 2001:500:48::1#53(b2.org.afilias-nst.org) > in 32 ms > > The last of the 3, ns1.twisted4life.com, is of the opinion that your > domain doesn't exist, given that it has no authoritative data and > refuses to do recursive lookups for the Internet at large. I would > suspect that this would result in the coming and going visibility > that others have reported. Basically, you don't exist a third of > the time. > > You need to make sure that all the nameservers you list with your > registrar are actually admitting to your existence and are getting > up-to-date data. I recall having this conversation with you before. > > -- If we did discuss this, it had nothing to do with the 3rd nameserver. twisted4life is something i added only a day or two ago; it was among the first googled. i haven't checked anything DNS-wise in the past day because of other things I Am trying to resolve. > > --Jon Radel > jon@radel.com > > -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix The 7.90a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php http://journey.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 19:33:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB099106564A; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:33:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amsibamsi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DB9A8FC14; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:33:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyx24 with SMTP id 24so1226416eyx.13 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:33:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UPnUOs1bcDzcwMzwAsiMKhbG/3QbqmC6tmhQsPH4oXk=; b=Wo0fDsEYMkDr1KTO89RvWfjHqMe7atuWyxXNIoI1+wl6vZ9YszOYSfcLekf6nkKgJY HlyWjsdkUlte4YGlLhiNmRidFbr9ZSh1O/AtuPSI8P7B1mVesZVzJwhA+Lr1aOybUneu bizkVAQ+g1ilOj1B1OQAaJSK6wOM+IVo0mLtQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=OfY2ghif7SQqhZDavFihXbN1mA1bvmONRJ4SxAbL3tij9kKREEEZOCqo5UsZUNqB6X +FPhND/zwLyJkmflw619I5xJY3xt7c2jETlhuY8rSvnbMwxRCxwqk8Fj56YTV6zsYZzm /dSJ98E6nX7HGNvlCG4wSaDTKt2RVvyZgsoTY= Received: by 10.14.37.10 with SMTP id x10mr2599854eea.33.1285873864272; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:11:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hulk.l.ttyv0.net (80-219-18-72.dclient.hispeed.ch [80.219.18.72]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v59sm294784eeh.16.2010.09.30.12.11.01 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 30 Sep 2010 12:11:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CA4E0C3.1050707@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 21:10:59 +0200 From: Anselm Strauss User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100723 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4CA3B8F5.80904@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4CA3B8F5.80904@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: USB disk on CS5536 unstable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:33:41 -0000 Maybe sending it to just the USB list was too specific ... On 09/30/10 00:08, Anselm Strauss wrote: > Hi > > I have an ALIX board that has an AMD Geode and the CS5536 companion chip > with integrated USB on it. When I connect a USB disk I have observed > various problems. For example when I run fsck_ufs on a 250 GB partition > the process gets stuck in biord state and fsck reports unreadable > sectors. When I do a dd over the whole disk and direct it to /dev/null > it suddenly returns with no error, but having read only a small fraction > of the disk. I tried it with two different disks and two different ALIX > boards. I'm pretty sure the disks are okay since I tried them on other > hardware. > > As far as I know there was some trouble with the chip regarding > timeouts. Under load after some time the USB just stops responding. I > have tried 8.0 and 8.1. Is there any known problem? How can I track this > down? > > Anselm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 19:37:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7DC41065693; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:37:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) Received: from swip.net (mailfe07.swip.net [212.247.154.193]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37A418FC21; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:37:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 [] X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=sEolSJAlcSxSMaOm1MQ0bvrIu+BNAN+OqG2UAUgC4Ok= c=1 sm=1 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=M8b_wTzEtboA:10 a=MnI1ikcADjEx7bvsp0jZvQ==:17 a=cs3SvN_-6pTT46pB1rEA:9 a=_cSDAwiD9e2FChBRIJYA:7 a=2S8SN5sS-Rn-QsbTN679usvFKjQA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=MnI1ikcADjEx7bvsp0jZvQ==:117 Received: from [188.126.201.140] (account mc467741@c2i.net HELO laptop002.hselasky.homeunix.org) by mailfe07.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.19) with ESMTPA id 28825099; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 21:37:37 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky To: freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 21:38:51 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.1-STABLE; KDE/4.4.5; amd64; ; ) References: <4CA3B8F5.80904@gmail.com> <4CA4E0C3.1050707@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4CA4E0C3.1050707@gmail.com> X-Face: +~\`s("[*|O,="7?X@L.elg*F"OA\I/3%^p8g?ab%RN'(; _IjlA: hGE..Ew, XAQ*o#\/M~SC=S1-f9{EzRfT'|Hhll5Q]ha5Bt-s|oTlKMusi:1e[wJl}kd}GR Z0adGx-x_0zGbZj'e(Y[(UNle~)8CQWXW@:DX+9)_YlB[tIccCPN$7/L' MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201009302138.51616.hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Anselm Strauss Subject: Re: USB disk on CS5536 unstable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 19:37:39 -0000 On Thursday 30 September 2010 21:10:59 Anselm Strauss wrote: > Maybe sending it to just the USB list was too specific ... > > On 09/30/10 00:08, Anselm Strauss wrote: > > Hi > > > > I have an ALIX board that has an AMD Geode and the CS5536 companion chip > > with integrated USB on it. When I connect a USB disk I have observed > > various problems. For example when I run fsck_ufs on a 250 GB partition > > the process gets stuck in biord state and fsck reports unreadable > > sectors. When I do a dd over the whole disk and direct it to /dev/null > > it suddenly returns with no error, but having read only a small fraction > > of the disk. I tried it with two different disks and two different ALIX > > boards. I'm pretty sure the disks are okay since I tried them on other > > hardware. > > > > As far as I know there was some trouble with the chip regarding > > timeouts. Under load after some time the USB just stops responding. I > > have tried 8.0 and 8.1. Is there any known problem? How can I track this > > down? > > > > Anselm If you compile the kernel with USB_DEBUG, then there are some sysctls under hw.usb.ehci which you can tweak. Needs to be set before boot. --HPS From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 22:17:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C651065785 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 22:17:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patfbsd@davenulle.org) Received: from smtp.lamaiziere.net (net.lamaiziere.net [91.121.44.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6C3D8FC0A for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 22:17:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from baby-jane.lamaiziere.net (unknown [192.168.1.10]) by smtp.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3EED63307D for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 00:17:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by baby-jane.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 373E72CFA1A for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 00:19:43 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 00:19:26 +0200 From: Patrick Lamaiziere To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101001001926.6ef8aa93@davenulle.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: router / firewall with PF and carp. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 22:17:20 -0000 Hi, We are in the process to replace two Cisco Pix firewalls and one Cisco router with two servers running PF with carp. The network is large (it is an University) and all will depend on this two machines. We have made some tests with OpenBSD, PF and OpenBGPD and it looks to work (but we have to make a lot of more tests to validate this). I think that the support for an OpenBSD release is very small (only one year) and I'm suggesting to use FreeBSD instead (we can expect ~3/4 years of support if we follow a stable branch). I am an happy user of FreeBSD since some time - I mean that I know it is not perfect and there are some bugs! - but I dont have any experience running it as a router on a large network. So, are PF and carp expected to work fine on FreeBSD or are there some known problems? Do you think that OpenBSD suits better for this? Thanks, regards. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 22:34:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2734106566C for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 22:34:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patfbsd@davenulle.org) Received: from smtp.lamaiziere.net (net.lamaiziere.net [91.121.44.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7927A8FC0C for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 22:34:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from baby-jane.lamaiziere.net (unknown [192.168.1.10]) by smtp.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 447D863307D for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 00:34:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by baby-jane.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9880C2CFA1A for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 00:36:39 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 00:36:29 +0200 From: Patrick Lamaiziere To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101001003629.64696c1d@davenulle.org> In-Reply-To: <4CA4E0C3.1050707@gmail.com> References: <4CA3B8F5.80904@gmail.com> <4CA4E0C3.1050707@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: USB disk on CS5536 unstable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 22:34:16 -0000 Le Thu, 30 Sep 2010 21:10:59 +0200, Anselm Strauss a écrit : > Maybe sending it to just the USB list was too specific ... > > On 09/30/10 00:08, Anselm Strauss wrote: > > I have an ALIX board that has an AMD Geode and the CS5536 companion > > chip with integrated USB on it. When I connect a USB disk I have > > observed various problems. For example when I run fsck_ufs on a 250 > > GB partition the process gets stuck in biord state and fsck reports > > unreadable sectors. When I do a dd over the whole disk and direct > > it to /dev/null it suddenly returns with no error, but having read > > only a small fraction of the disk. I tried it with two different > > disks and two different ALIX boards. I'm pretty sure the disks are > > okay since I tried them on other hardware. > > > > As far as I know there was some trouble with the chip regarding > > timeouts. Under load after some time the USB just stops responding. > > I have tried 8.0 and 8.1. Is there any known problem? How can I > > track this down? I use a Soekris Net5501 (amd Geode and cs5536 chip) too since FreeBSD 6.X and I did not notice any problem with an usb disk (myne is a 160 go disk). It is my home "all-in-one box" doing backup and NAS (some times I make a backup on a usb drive) I follow the Soekris mailing list and I do not remembered anymone complaining about usb disk problems too. Regards. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 30 23:53:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73FF8106566C for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 23:53:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@fletchermoorland.co.uk) Received: from hydra.fletchermoorland.co.uk (hydra.fletchermoorland.co.uk [78.33.209.59]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5ABD8FC12 for ; Thu, 30 Sep 2010 23:53:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from demophon.fletchermoorland.co.uk ([192.168.0.154]) by hydra.fletchermoorland.co.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o8UNqx2f047148; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 00:52:59 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from paul@fletchermoorland.co.uk) Message-ID: <4CA522DB.5050008@fletchermoorland.co.uk> Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 23:52:59 +0000 From: Paul Wootton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100817 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kaya Saman References: <4CA4461F.6030508@gmail.com> <4CA4988E.2000200@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us> <4CA49F10.90603@gmail.com> <4CA4A4A0.1000007@beanfield.com> <4CA4A4B8.6020509@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4CA4A4B8.6020509@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on hydra.fletchermoorland.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mother board compatibility and CF card usage as main storage device for small DNS server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2010 23:53:03 -0000 On 09/30/10 14:54, Kaya Saman wrote: > On 30/09/2010 17:54, Brent Bloxam wrote: >> Kaya Saman wrote: >>> From what you mention it sounds like a bad idea as the system disk >>> will have many R/W's going through it it seems as /tmp and Swap get >>> written to all the time. >>> >> >> You can skip swap altogether and use MFS (memory filesystem) like >> Brian mentioned for other high write partitions that don't need to be >> persistent (/tmp, /var/log). See the following article on the >> freebsd.org website about using solid state storage: >> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/solid-state/article.html >> >> Keep in mind though that Brian's setup was for slave nameservers that >> would be caching from another master. If your nameserver is acting as >> master, you'll be storing your records on flash since you need >> persistent storage, but I don't imagine those files will be write >> intensive. >> >> Also, if you make /var/log MFS, you'll want to have an external >> syslog server set up ;) > > Thanks a lot so it should be ok then! :-) > > Yeah sounds like a good setup, and also a syslog server :-)))) this is > exactly what I need in order to check my IOS logs coming from my Cisco > boxes. I had previously imagined it to be a simple tftpboot server but > sounds like it's standalone. > > That's cool! I mean I really like having logwatch mailing me all > necessary information anyway so that coupled with a syslog server > should be pretty good :-) > > Nice ideas need to do some Google'ing now as I don't know what MFS is > yet but I will.... :-D > > Cheers and best regards, > > > Kaya I have been using a Soekris Net5501-70 box since June 2008 with a CF card running FreeBSD 7. This is being used for DNS, DHCP, NNTP, network firewall and a small asterisk server I have turned off writing messages to logs, and in June this year, I started using an MD for /var/db/dhcpd (as that was getting written to a fair amount) Im still on my original CF card, and as of yet, have not seen any problems (touch wood)... Its not the fastest box in the world, but it certainly does what I want it to do. Just takes a long time compiling a world and kernel Just another option for you... Paul From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 08:40:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9304E106566B for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 08:40:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kayasaman@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 212048FC13 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 08:40:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb29 with SMTP id 29so1238566wyb.13 for ; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 01:40:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8E/t1X7rcDbY/+RvwBaWVP9qoDbpwrRh4zS1Wp0zctk=; b=xzRmi7at4TfbUPkF74LrJGiNBwyEDU9t9RRv3sC3UrE/D16JqG+fXjSlJWxKxVBeFo JmnnQAnY3emIYM0a99GXNRT/nsCc7KYuX8myDmu0reVuUX4NJisD2/WS5ZiOU9Nkcb0h wjJrq4A5Kfx/Ht4u3g7ppd+EILNqBtfPasHuA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=LjJXWky2fKBOgWXl1uCu2e9rtRtVID7kTMSZ8yTXs0tC4Vn8oMj0/a4aFsQTxsyh/u r15bDQpwTeTD6PsKFpO5H+VWlk1yqtu2VoykGO2L1c/vqp85+87wtiCPmdP/TouCEoWR MC9ZhNDBjj976OO0x+e7aiu7kTrDyNiGIlsR0= Received: by 10.227.20.69 with SMTP id e5mr4029981wbb.87.1285922426004; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 01:40:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.52] ([85.105.64.2]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id e31sm787139wbe.23.2010.10.01.01.40.24 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 01 Oct 2010 01:40:25 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CA59D65.3040402@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 11:35:49 +0300 From: Kaya Saman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100914 Thunderbird/3.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Paul Wootton References: <4CA4461F.6030508@gmail.com> <4CA4988E.2000200@noc.cfi.pgh.pa.us> <4CA49F10.90603@gmail.com> <4CA4A4A0.1000007@beanfield.com> <4CA4A4B8.6020509@gmail.com> <4CA522DB.5050008@fletchermoorland.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4CA522DB.5050008@fletchermoorland.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: nathan@vidican.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Mother board compatibility and CF card usage as main storage device for small DNS server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 08:40:27 -0000 Many thanks for the responses! On 01/10/2010 02:52, Paul Wootton wrote: > On 09/30/10 14:54, Kaya Saman wrote: >> On 30/09/2010 17:54, Brent Bloxam wrote: >>> Kaya Saman wrote: >>>> From what you mention it sounds like a bad idea as the system disk >>>> will have many R/W's going through it it seems as /tmp and Swap get >>>> written to all the time. >>>> >>> >>> You can skip swap altogether and use MFS (memory filesystem) like >>> Brian mentioned for other high write partitions that don't need to >>> be persistent (/tmp, /var/log). See the following article on the >>> freebsd.org website about using solid state storage: >>> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/solid-state/article.html >>> >>> Keep in mind though that Brian's setup was for slave nameservers >>> that would be caching from another master. If your nameserver is >>> acting as master, you'll be storing your records on flash since you >>> need persistent storage, but I don't imagine those files will be >>> write intensive. >>> >>> Also, if you make /var/log MFS, you'll want to have an external >>> syslog server set up ;) >> >> Thanks a lot so it should be ok then! :-) >> >> Yeah sounds like a good setup, and also a syslog server :-)))) this >> is exactly what I need in order to check my IOS logs coming from my >> Cisco boxes. I had previously imagined it to be a simple tftpboot >> server but sounds like it's standalone. >> >> That's cool! I mean I really like having logwatch mailing me all >> necessary information anyway so that coupled with a syslog server >> should be pretty good :-) >> >> Nice ideas need to do some Google'ing now as I don't know what MFS is >> yet but I will.... :-D >> >> Cheers and best regards, >> >> >> Kaya > > I have been using a Soekris Net5501-70 box since June 2008 with a CF > card running FreeBSD 7. > > This is being used for DNS, DHCP, NNTP, network firewall and a small > asterisk server > > I have turned off writing messages to logs, and in June this year, I > started using an MD for /var/db/dhcpd (as that was getting written to > a fair amount) > Im still on my original CF card, and as of yet, have not seen any > problems (touch wood)... > > Its not the fastest box in the world, but it certainly does what I > want it to do. Just takes a long time compiling a world and kernel > > > Just another option for you... > > Paul I checked out the Soekris and looks more like a firewall style design with multiple LAN ports and kinda a bit more then what I need! Perhaps I'll just stick to my original SSD idea even though I'll pay a bit more but a 40GB Intel X.25 SSD should do the trick. - Am currently using this in another design for DNS where I'm using 2 BSD Jails for primary and secondary and is ultra fast :-) Just a bit more expensive but that's ok I guess.... Best Regards, Kaya From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 09:14:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 856351065675 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 09:14:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 364B98FC18 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 09:14:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk33 with SMTP id 33so165855qyk.13 for ; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 02:14:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=+N7K23QBooQ+a9iIXLBhlduoXBays4738h9HtkU/Vq0=; b=IOco3nBoSFGE9xOZVvTmturEFHPKOeAMiiqpejY3gr2UQ0lxk9O7J/3vTt9t+e6G9K XHJg9dO3/+cPWIm3bTStwTMWtXHiucVIQlQ185h1SzUjCXuw1jqe6NR8kkynhrGqC8xb IB0OhIj59fNk/ovDdzKapSfMfg7B6PKv14Xuk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=fApfhk1eph4N5ihCWpDMqaFEpuer3YvzGxonIDllurXRCinXq5IvlwT6d6rTBOzkXg My1IqgcLuy6DK4TAncaXI7V5C06F99mcaFIm9hDCloWH8YDLp89lr+UnyJElDQD9NhTa Z3HpjVZyb178u2h7brJvGPUmzMuchH8auxBBM= Received: by 10.224.11.140 with SMTP id t12mr3495015qat.314.1285924440303; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 02:14:00 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.102.13 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 02:13:28 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100930155915.GA26665@catflap.slightlystrange.org> References: <20100930155915.GA26665@catflap.slightlystrange.org> From: Odhiambo Washington Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 12:13:28 +0300 Message-ID: To: Daniel Bye , User Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Upgrading autoconf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 09:14:03 -0000 On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Daniel Bye < freebsd-questions@slightlystrange.org> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 06:50:22PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > I am trying this out: > > > > #portupgrade -f 'autoconf*' 'automake*' > > Try upgrading the failing ports by hand. portupgrade tends to suppress full > error output, making it difficult to ascertain exactly what's gone wrong. > > Alternatively, I would be tempted to just uninstall autoconf* and > automake*, > since they will get pulled in as dependencies whenever you come to build > another port that requires them. > > Hi Dan, Turns out the culprit was m4. Once I did 'portupgrade m4' successfully, everything now compiled fine. The box is running FreeBSD 6.4-STABLE which I was ashamed to mention:-) Will migrate it to 8.x soon, by doing a new installation and migrating. Or should I wait for FreeBSD-9 ?? -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ "If you have nothing good to say about someone, just shut up!." -- Lucky Dube From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 09:29:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FC021065673 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 09:29:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B638F8FC16 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 09:29:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm9 with SMTP id 9so2466078fxm.13 for ; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 02:29:12 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=rIF7dgg31lfE2XVV5UgUYd+VtsY/yD4twP5zBCHhOIk=; b=s9ZBHzCw65KSkLkn2wcgy96MK/DTqQzn/XGqBvIZyfP/GPrZXJhNpdMZ9803GgYIs/ 0drZqnxGPzteOD0iAWR4VrHDUmyvoC/Tr12kiHMzCrWoo2zsCLMnN8ioNDWkVpA/KdAw LF+stlBLw+YT+ECqtNUvW9H90EyE6bb2d6TJI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=hmvVsmUpPY0g2ctoXv/j2Zkog3DjN9B9LpcAt+FgArjZ+GPNtdqjCt/XBxrFKvuHgJ Uj1WOyV7tT8qWfagBrc1ArrKqoh8xLHfvvvcyvL+EyqoxL0n1RpLQYJDsVIFWFLq0Rrt hoi/OH8gsTRQPVfbET6nlYjK16IKX9esiKdcA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.24.15 with SMTP id b15mr2435075muj.39.1285925351873; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 02:29:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.68.9 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 02:29:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20101001001926.6ef8aa93@davenulle.org> References: <20101001001926.6ef8aa93@davenulle.org> Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 10:29:11 +0100 Message-ID: From: krad To: Patrick Lamaiziere Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: router / firewall with PF and carp. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 09:29:15 -0000 On 30 September 2010 23:19, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote: > Hi, > > We are in the process to replace two Cisco Pix firewalls and one Cisco > router with two servers running PF with carp. The network is large > (it is an University) and all will depend on this two machines. > > We have made some tests with OpenBSD, PF and OpenBGPD and it looks to > work (but we have to make a lot of more tests to validate this). > > I think that the support for an OpenBSD release is very small (only one > year) and I'm suggesting to use FreeBSD instead (we can expect ~3/4 > years of support if we follow a stable branch). > > I am an happy user of FreeBSD since some time - I mean that I know it is > not perfect and there are some bugs! - but I dont have any experience > running it as a router on a large network. So, are PF and carp expected > to work fine on FreeBSD or are there some known problems? > > Do you think that OpenBSD suits better for this? > > Thanks, regards. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > In my experiance freebsd should work fine. However I would say openbsd is probably better suited to your needs, due to its tighter security model (auditing) You will also get a newer version of pf with openbsd. If you get issues with openBGP would could look at quagga. I have used it in the past but havent for a while so am not sure of the state of it now. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 09:36:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DA5A1065672 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 09:36:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@slightlystrange.org) Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org (cpc2-cmbg1-0-0-cust385.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com [82.21.105.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6DBF8FC1E for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 09:36:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dan by catflap.slightlystrange.org with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1P1c2a-0006j3-Rj for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 10:36:32 +0100 Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 10:36:32 +0100 From: Daniel Bye To: User Questions Message-ID: <20101001093632.GC26665@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: User Questions References: <20100930155915.GA26665@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3siQDZowHQqNOShm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-PGP-Fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE amd64 Sender: Daniel Bye Subject: Re: Upgrading autoconf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 09:36:34 -0000 --3siQDZowHQqNOShm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 12:13:28PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Daniel Bye < > freebsd-questions@slightlystrange.org> wrote: >=20 > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 06:50:22PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > > I am trying this out: > > > > > > #portupgrade -f 'autoconf*' 'automake*' > > > > Try upgrading the failing ports by hand. portupgrade tends to suppress = full > > error output, making it difficult to ascertain exactly what's gone wron= g. > > > > Alternatively, I would be tempted to just uninstall autoconf* and > > automake*, > > since they will get pulled in as dependencies whenever you come to build > > another port that requires them. > > > > > Hi Dan, >=20 > Turns out the culprit was m4. Once I did 'portupgrade m4' successfully, > everything now compiled fine. The box is running FreeBSD 6.4-STABLE which= I > was ashamed to mention:-) Glad you fixed it! > Will migrate it to 8.x soon, by doing a new installation and migrating. >=20 > Or should I wait for FreeBSD-9 ?? I'd go for 8.x as soon as possible. It'll be a while before 9 is ready for production, and when it is released, it should be pretty straight forward to upgrade from 8.x using the standard buildworld cycle, provided your setup isn't too outlandish! Dan --=20 Daniel Bye _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --3siQDZowHQqNOShm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkylq6AACgkQixf5fBYiFmrEWgCg2dll3pMqUKuI9Otlf52tNJZz A9AAni7qVyF1lyx3iqQGSJ1GJKFCzLfU =gTLZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3siQDZowHQqNOShm-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 09:59:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F60B1065675 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 09:59:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 161478FC14 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 09:59:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn34 with SMTP id 34so4448943iwn.13 for ; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 02:59:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=z0lhB0QrDlho4Qs/sdSE7aYo2o8DWTox45WFm4QiuJ0=; b=C9uTFfvd2nQSeG8gwTFgovgrMEq4LckQvqQ+yinFfMRh7McbtYBg/wgHO1qx/Q+8qC Rhdd2pgs4A/dlwesVis4mfO1Q4zsX/LhNVpmqKBV7uXNqSHbRzX3CfH2GmvNICqiE0la bGieWd7ptCs65MlxlwTuIkqSn/PBTaF6lIKvk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=oqg38PGIpkRMA7YRbTOkU0SgbuLZ75EsJUjAh5VHLUmBlt5SYhn31Wl3mpq7ezIAeu onIc0bNCdLnlMYC6WBqJxBvujoMKj9LGOlYeMmGFkhLYtSIuwYnq+5GZADHrCpXTW7WC yEWJi6fi1eiP9F+hHl7IWZ2Kzn37Dy0Pj4AT8= Received: by 10.231.145.16 with SMTP id b16mr5332760ibv.198.1285927182740; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 02:59:42 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.166.193 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 02:59:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Zbigniew Szalbot Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 11:59:27 +0200 Message-ID: To: User Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: A command to check network transfer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 09:59:48 -0000 Dear all, I cannot for the life of mine remember the command which allows me to check incoming and outgoing transfer on lo0 and re0. Can you please help? :) Thanks a lot! Zbigniew Szalbot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 10:06:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B10A41065670 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 10:06:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EEB58FC19 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 10:06:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz15 with SMTP id 15so2705920bwz.13 for ; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 03:06:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=aAZagFgLZvn5rbuCVLVyqmNqBBkHaSkp8zOE1bFvFsg=; b=Ur8OI2PU54LfOaPnWkUwaTZhXC4F0wym90ZppDWZRpgwCuKM+mKPsTDNkl/nuHEC4g yxmAuzFRpvx9rErkzRyzlt5w7Mq4TBJT+sWqCMvdLHeY5e3aKBC+B4jcuXZqLhsalFoj fvE5tHj+YnuZWyPpm7YuJ+Y3Y8DrFElH8KVqM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=NNh0HAqTbrP0EyMeZuSW5iehIRkbioRZ+1PmrECa1SR1qD/YDKX2UZadJXQ9R1Lh3y WGOVS9HTxLHWNeSHph8bQDq7XQHh4VCamwTUB0xKpxxTid5MBvjYISq3qYuR4vlUYJlr EMROnB87plQu6CK2TGVAvDe6BqgAn1RWY9oVA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.179.9 with SMTP id bo9mr3808763bkb.80.1285927571251; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 03:06:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.148.82 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 03:06:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 12:06:11 +0200 Message-ID: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?= To: Zbigniew Szalbot Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: User Questions Subject: Re: A command to check network transfer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 10:06:14 -0000 On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > Dear all, > > I cannot for the life of mine remember the command which allows me to > check incoming and outgoing transfer on lo0 and re0. Can you please > help? :) I use iftop[1] Cheers! [1] http://www.freebsdsoftware.org/net-mgmt/iftop.html > > Thanks a lot! > > Zbigniew Szalbot > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 10:08:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 790791065670 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 10:08:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F2468FC14 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 10:08:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn34 with SMTP id 34so4458362iwn.13 for ; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 03:08:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=g9kVhYt3wb+9LKk6NoXDSGA9AYp0hrIOXURArWjeWdU=; b=A9Imwjjl1sIO5X8GRh7FMKFDGOKnWivs3JdIdI25fy70xcXlwubhqURJRK4VJhyTM1 rY5br7Ga7vGyUAtK9OsoIevJT0oJkXkWLcTljZGDLyWuH+K+MhDj7nOvmyt9LRon9Hno RpCsOlGEWM+hQt4iJPZlCA/MCaJ4zHml5TwI0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=lgcopZL6vHZdevYfdnvP3aGgTZGiVGuJB5Rg6SEXTy9xIjXFueq+9T+t4H3KevsaZX wWmPgPK6OMUhUekI15MWRLEbuNMEKzv8mE7NeLnj6U1HS84KqFyRwT4LI3bgTcfd42zl mmXOim6antEbs57sd5WECHe8DNAGDJYmDZsS8= Received: by 10.231.12.136 with SMTP id x8mr5223203ibx.55.1285927691441; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 03:08:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.166.193 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 03:07:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Zbigniew Szalbot Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 12:07:56 +0200 Message-ID: To: =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=C3=ADa?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: User Questions Subject: Re: A command to check network transfer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 10:08:12 -0000 Hi there, 2010/10/1 Fernando Apestegu=C3=ADa : >> I cannot for the life of mine remember the command which allows me to >> check incoming and outgoing transfer on lo0 and re0. Can you please >> help? :) > > I use iftop[1] No, this one is built into the system. I havent't used it for some time and cannot now recollect it. :( Thanks! Zbigniew Szalbot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 10:15:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5411106564A for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 10:15:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from ch-smtp03.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp03.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C8918FC0A for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 10:15:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from c83-255-61-120.bredband.comhem.se ([83.255.61.120]:22335 helo=falcon.midgard.homeip.net) by ch-smtp03.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.68) (envelope-from ) id 1P1cdH-00036x-Bw for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 12:14:29 +0200 Received: (qmail 75655 invoked from network); 1 Oct 2010 12:14:25 +0200 Received: from owl.midgard.homeip.net (10.1.5.7) by falcon.midgard.homeip.net with ESMTP; 1 Oct 2010 12:14:25 +0200 Received: (qmail 68467 invoked by uid 1001); 1 Oct 2010 12:14:25 +0200 Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 12:14:25 +0200 From: Erik Trulsson To: Zbigniew Szalbot Message-ID: <20101001101425.GA68427@owl.midgard.homeip.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Originating-IP: 83.255.61.120 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1P1cdH-00036x-Bw. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp03.sth.basefarm.net 1P1cdH-00036x-Bw 58dcfc3276fbca59851962b3458fbe92 Cc: User Questions , Fernando =?iso-8859-1?Q?Apestegu=EDa?= Subject: Re: A command to check network transfer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 10:15:16 -0000 On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 12:07:56PM +0200, Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > Hi there, >=20 > 2010/10/1 Fernando Apestegu=EDa : > >> I cannot for the life of mine remember the command which allows me to > >> check incoming and outgoing transfer on lo0 and re0. Can you please > >> help? :) > > > > I use iftop[1] >=20 > No, this one is built into the system. I havent't used it for some > time and cannot now recollect it. :( Try 'systat -if 1' or 'netstat -I re0 -w 1' / 'netstat -I lo0 -w 1'.=20 One of them is probably what you are thinking of. --=20 Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 10:16:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F2E01065672 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 10:16:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zszalbot@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 244F58FC19 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 10:16:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn34 with SMTP id 34so4467443iwn.13 for ; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 03:16:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=CeFVnNho3j+6PUMXLJtDUezVuwvuQreQAJBL4ijm05g=; b=eK+Qmdcvi3AM7PFzBi930V8o+O2MevxdhRKgI+6DdsgXKTMKDpNlsyg98OC9BFlIpu mbSZD5O54JTkGSDqAC/8eyOo7CtBvqwU5BDjj71J/ZMdsz6LIdNjdxDMQcCvqzQ3A5jx /B50/RkAGPTFmLNaIdi4frH/ldz8V3OhznwRI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=SehfIJ9GcmzgrjjVpW13S2vzzmnAk4+7HmUq0umv06fkeEIpBrib15CNDHldjC1vbn ikrBrCHZDCu2HQwNWyXl6Ifol4T3LUC7sXZNYFtU2UJM3i3YrnHe8SAsoo0apKGr7zlR yWBdY0PP4wwafgYj+pKsT6pERNZ9FCwiP304Y= Received: by 10.231.172.70 with SMTP id k6mr5384774ibz.125.1285928185302; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 03:16:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.166.193 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 03:16:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20101001101425.GA68427@owl.midgard.homeip.net> References: <20101001101425.GA68427@owl.midgard.homeip.net> From: Zbigniew Szalbot Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 12:16:10 +0200 Message-ID: To: Erik Trulsson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: User Questions , =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=C3=ADa?= Subject: Re: A command to check network transfer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 10:16:26 -0000 > Try 'systat -if 1' or 'netstat -I re0 -w 1' / 'netstat -I lo0 -w 1'. > One of them is probably what you are thinking of. systat -if This is what I was looking for. Many, many thanks! Zbigniew Szalbot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 10:46:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC91106566C for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 10:46:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark@exonetric.com) Received: from relay0.exonetric.net (relay0.exonetric.net [82.138.248.161]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 164F58FC17 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 10:46:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from markimac.fairfx.local (unknown [62.244.179.66]) by relay0.exonetric.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EC3A57010; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 11:15:29 +0100 (BST) Message-ID: <4CA5B4BF.4080905@exonetric.com> Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 11:15:27 +0100 From: Mark Blackman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.13) Gecko/20100914 SeaMonkey/2.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zbigniew Szalbot References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A command to check network transfer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 10:46:35 -0000 Zbigniew Szalbot wrote: > Dear all, > > I cannot for the life of mine remember the command which allows me to > check incoming and outgoing transfer on lo0 and re0. Can you please > help? :) netstat -w 1 -i lo0 and netstat -w -l -i re0 for 1 second updates on each interface with packets/bytes in/out - Mark From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 11:54:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCF0C1065670 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 11:54:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D8198FC15 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 11:54:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gyg4 with SMTP id 4so1367794gyg.13 for ; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 04:54:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.151.93.17 with SMTP id v17mr890864ybl.320.1285934085508; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 04:54:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-071-077-039-064.nc.res.rr.com [71.77.39.64]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v37sm799124yba.20.2010.10.01.04.54.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 01 Oct 2010 04:54:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: FreeBSD.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 241A5E54872 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 07:54:43 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 07:54:42 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20101001075442.48b0d4e8@scorpio> In-Reply-To: References: <20100930155915.GA26665@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Upgrading autoconf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 11:54:46 -0000 On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 12:13:28 +0300 Odhiambo Washington articulated: > Or should I wait for FreeBSD-9 ?? Or Freebsd-10.x perhaps! -- Jerry ✌ FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 12:02:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BDF61065693 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 12:02:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FBD18FC18 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 12:02:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk33 with SMTP id 33so354086qyk.13 for ; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 05:02:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=APzZUr+DnKPpU+ZsWZhdd6Ecouz6peeF0J5EaD0hq84=; b=OHKjY1JxSd7i+Urnl9xpN7L9qIsXqskhRZzYjKNGj7DR0RbsETHuRbq17T9+CKAVSG FBT4Reyb8bQyWaG3zssb19BvM3B8Q9HBeIMFC//AN99+u8KCZthBdv755xB0W4xF+EiH vbDKzA8JDlIQ5wgvOi7WoTd5dDN+n1akcqtBY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=gtTx0CKVh9uLDukp/iXE7aQEX4KvPS7G6KYY2pT9u+QMBWvbvXJHyXxUuFS5t+FQmX bs9UVwB61TThpwFMER724A0I5fP6IpB2PBbcxGW8S8mymTrn9Drw9fkwq7p11jq7hEuN CppY56yaMwK2/Ea3QGnfbuA0gV4eZKaTT6HNk= Received: by 10.224.71.143 with SMTP id h15mr3496444qaj.217.1285934564344; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 05:02:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.102.13 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 05:02:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20101001093632.GC26665@catflap.slightlystrange.org> References: <20100930155915.GA26665@catflap.slightlystrange.org> <20101001093632.GC26665@catflap.slightlystrange.org> From: Odhiambo Washington Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 15:02:10 +0300 Message-ID: To: Daniel Bye , User Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Upgrading autoconf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 12:02:45 -0000 On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 12:36 PM, Daniel Bye < freebsd-questions@slightlystrange.org> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 12:13:28PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Daniel Bye < > > freebsd-questions@slightlystrange.org> wrote: > > > > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 06:50:22PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > > > I am trying this out: > > > > > > > > #portupgrade -f 'autoconf*' 'automake*' > > > > > > Try upgrading the failing ports by hand. portupgrade tends to suppress > full > > > error output, making it difficult to ascertain exactly what's gone > wrong. > > > > > > Alternatively, I would be tempted to just uninstall autoconf* and > > > automake*, > > > since they will get pulled in as dependencies whenever you come to > build > > > another port that requires them. > > > > > > > > Hi Dan, > > > > Turns out the culprit was m4. Once I did 'portupgrade m4' successfully, > > everything now compiled fine. The box is running FreeBSD 6.4-STABLE which > I > > was ashamed to mention:-) > > Glad you fixed it! > > > Will migrate it to 8.x soon, by doing a new installation and migrating. > > > > Or should I wait for FreeBSD-9 ?? > > I'd go for 8.x as soon as possible. It'll be a while before 9 is ready for > production, and when it is released, it should be pretty straight forward > to > upgrade from 8.x using the standard buildworld cycle, provided your setup > isn't too outlandish! > > Update 6.4 to 8.x?? Or you mean some upgrade path like install 8.x and then migrate services?:-) -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ "If you have nothing good to say about someone, just shut up!." -- Lucky Dube From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 12:17:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 297361065670 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 12:17:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from espada.jorge@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDA2F8FC13 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 12:17:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk8 with SMTP id 8so1563046qyk.13 for ; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 05:17:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=M3s28SM89tNZuUOQjdwnwuPSoe6khpuR39zOdH2t9AY=; b=k+0TP9kRiBvnAu1jbbRQTdscAsHNaejLSp4mSdIRjGB97J//7HaqvBTGw0OsKZe0oS Ij63zfH6C7YlNX641tjcJaxw3MBr04aoCLW0niACK0jOmgaherK11br3NziVM9WH7nBO DxpARiAemjG60fbf1WTYHRAXU2TksgUWpDAdE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=mURY8moDOySk7PHXpIpxBMQsM2wUxJbntDUsJxUKeFdnhkx8wK4z3YtMcPiTyYbL09 MuN8JIYJfCkB+5JiKgvWpO7iNDTnSVE8lrcYUSHNdBsXmy4F3TNn1KgLTI7g084Sg+73 0qR7CBN6d5vGwYv9OmLD1IMsic/abIoFizUJg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.73.132 with SMTP id q4mr3854548qcj.132.1285935460859; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 05:17:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.89.84 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 05:17:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20101001001926.6ef8aa93@davenulle.org> Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 09:17:40 -0300 Message-ID: From: jorge espada To: krad Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Patrick Lamaiziere , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: router / firewall with PF and carp. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 12:17:42 -0000 I can say that both of them are pretty good choice, in my personal experience I had the same configuration that you are planning to implement qith two servers on OpenBsd 4.6 + carp+ bgp as a router in a huge network , the only problem was some well know bug with carp and bgp..that for some reason some times one of the server nic (carp-backup) try to became master, when wasn't necesary... and the routes were screwed up. But now with the new openbsd 4.8, if i were you I would give it a try Jorge E. Espada On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 6:29 AM, krad wrote: > On 30 September 2010 23:19, Patrick Lamaiziere >wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > We are in the process to replace two Cisco Pix firewalls and one Cisco > > router with two servers running PF with carp. The network is large > > (it is an University) and all will depend on this two machines. > > > > We have made some tests with OpenBSD, PF and OpenBGPD and it looks to > > work (but we have to make a lot of more tests to validate this). > > > > I think that the support for an OpenBSD release is very small (only one > > year) and I'm suggesting to use FreeBSD instead (we can expect ~3/4 > > years of support if we follow a stable branch). > > > > I am an happy user of FreeBSD since some time - I mean that I know it is > > not perfect and there are some bugs! - but I dont have any experience > > running it as a router on a large network. So, are PF and carp expected > > to work fine on FreeBSD or are there some known problems? > > > > Do you think that OpenBSD suits better for this? > > > > Thanks, regards. > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > In my experiance freebsd should work fine. However I would say openbsd is > probably better suited to your needs, due to its tighter security model > (auditing) You will also get a newer version of pf with openbsd. If you get > issues with openBGP would could look at quagga. I have used it in the past > but havent for a while so am not sure of the state of it now. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 12:41:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 111DD1065672 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 12:41:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kkobb@skylinecorp.com) Received: from mail.skylinecorp.com (mail.skylinecorp.com [72.42.206.86]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C655F8FC19 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 12:41:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.2.42] ([172.17.0.161]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.skylinecorp.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o91COUFu065584 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 08:24:30 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from kkobb@skylinecorp.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=skylinecorp.com; s=mail; t=1285935870; bh=CCGJOBmC13oxaXC7KSvTv68FaVwRzTg0r91RiPTu0Us=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=CHAW+I5hoL8HJnjOBoX737mMtug1Nu4KY/rgQCfp2PPfTgD08bYWJ2V/MXQM6Nf2l beqnoU+RxjiAkNnL00KD+pWSaWyUNAufAGJsVp5T3p4nKl1ZJG7m1z5Jf39nb9JHXV silsMEKpNs42ezL0BhaNUV/XCvTTlt0HRESRh3bI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=mail2; d=skylinecorp.com; c=simple; q=dns; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to: subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=WzZ+6/7ncLh6di1Wo7OaAEfglAXzcghMP9Zr7NS+/bc6HssMoDBi5nl/FIYh2oLQS Vj3PBEYWu7seYYTSf/BCw== Message-ID: <4CA5D2FE.8070900@skylinecorp.com> Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 08:24:30 -0400 From: Kevin Kobb Organization: Skyline Corporation User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101001001926.6ef8aa93@davenulle.org> In-Reply-To: <20101001001926.6ef8aa93@davenulle.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Skyline-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-Skyline-MailScanner-ID: o91COUFu065584 X-Skyline-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Skyline-MailScanner-MCPCheck: MCP-Clean, MCP-Checker (score=0, required 1) X-Skyline-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-105.2, required 4.25, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -4.80, BAYES_00 -0.30, DKIM_SIGNED 0.10, DKIM_VALID -0.10, DKIM_VALID_AU -0.10, USER_IN_DKIM_WHITELIST -100.00) X-Skyline-MailScanner-From: kkobb@skylinecorp.com X-Skyline-MailScanner-Watermark: 1286540671.78778@kHDpa+1kXiIlNXkmkUDU0w X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Re: router / firewall with PF and carp. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 12:41:23 -0000 Both would probably be fine. However, I would recommend taking a look at pfsense if I were you. It is made to do what you want without as much of the overhead as a full blown *BSD install. It is easier to configure, update, the documentation is good, and you can get top notch paid support from the developers if you want. On 9/30/2010 6:19 PM, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote: > Hi, > > We are in the process to replace two Cisco Pix firewalls and one Cisco > router with two servers running PF with carp. The network is large > (it is an University) and all will depend on this two machines. > > We have made some tests with OpenBSD, PF and OpenBGPD and it looks to > work (but we have to make a lot of more tests to validate this). > > I think that the support for an OpenBSD release is very small (only one > year) and I'm suggesting to use FreeBSD instead (we can expect ~3/4 > years of support if we follow a stable branch). > > I am an happy user of FreeBSD since some time - I mean that I know it is > not perfect and there are some bugs! - but I dont have any experience > running it as a router on a large network. So, are PF and carp expected > to work fine on FreeBSD or are there some known problems? > > Do you think that OpenBSD suits better for this? > > Thanks, regards. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 13:40:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 972CA106566B for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 13:40:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevin.wilcox@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52E488FC1C for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 13:40:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwb15 with SMTP id 15so1424985gwb.13 for ; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 06:40:58 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=lAqJdmLdAZraJIJ4lO/knR/H6ComEDlE+h4hz5XFIO0=; b=l0vJI4iufmTSiZf7i7z44kIhnoxs3ncNMKl/g2TiC2XXoYvwoySfUTCSXp7gRecPED OSBvY/R9wWfaINsyrRZgxDg3bHAGNEKTHjq0RhxDikk7exfLXMDe9gJsL0+qtD1P+PEk f8fmBVpscMkKIeO9ZoQKVuPYc4f7jAYS4fuH4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=DDqybQw9y24kinUptYU6gjIZpm+hNM8pRK1AGEV/h/aimheggc8o01wUlgE/nWrjcr EXG1GqJGjdfJOxnjtp/yIaAVrMo3opiTU/mDnYkcvDZ7mNY6M4t5e1WeiRuQvlEVPU/1 QJcdlllqAvO6uPZaxw7uFbxcCvjGjwbzV+/es= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.63.14 with SMTP id l14mr1430400aga.187.1285940456873; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 06:40:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.10.19 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 06:40:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20101001001926.6ef8aa93@davenulle.org> Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 09:40:56 -0400 Message-ID: From: Kevin Wilcox To: krad Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Free BSD Questions list Subject: Re: router / firewall with PF and carp. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 13:40:59 -0000 On 1 October 2010 05:29, krad wrote: > In my experiance freebsd should work fine. However I would say openbsd is > probably better suited to your needs, due to its tighter security model > (auditing) Krad, I was under the impression that 'audit' from TrustedBSD is built into FreeBSD. Is there a facility in OpenBSD that is "better" or is there something in 'audit' that is lacking? Thanks! kmw From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 14:01:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07B9F1065693 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 14:01:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chetan.shukla@aricent.com) Received: from jaguar.aricent.com (jaguar.aricent.com [121.241.96.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98A8C8FC17 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 14:01:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jaguar.aricent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss71 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ACAB36BBC for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 19:07:32 +0530 (IST) Received: from GUREXHT01.ASIAN.AD.ARICENT.COM (gurexht01.asian.ad.aricent.com [10.203.171.136]) by jaguar.aricent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04E0E36BB9 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 19:07:32 +0530 (IST) Received: from GUREXMB01.asian.ad.aricent.com ([10.203.171.130]) by GUREXHT01.ASIAN.AD.ARICENT.COM ([10.203.171.137]) with mapi; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 19:08:54 +0530 From: Chetan Shukla To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 19:08:54 +0530 Thread-Topic: How to check version of Make in FreeBSD Thread-Index: ActhbHQkIsPUTg4WRKmx7D51+JMv8AAAUKlg Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: FW: How to check version of Make in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 14:01:59 -0000 Hi All, I am working on some code porting activity that wants Some code to be ported on FreeBSD. I need to check the version of Make installed in FreeBSD. make -v does not help here. What is the similar command in FreeBSD ? Thanks & Regards, Chetan "DISCLAIMER: This message is proprietary to Aricent and is intended solely = for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain privi= leged or confidential information and should not be circulated or used for = any purpose other than for what it is intended. If you have received this m= essage in error, please notify the originator immediately. If you are not t= he intended recipient, you are notified that you are strictly prohibited fr= om using, copying, altering, or disclosing the contents of this message. Ar= icent accepts no responsibility for loss or damage arising from the use of = the information transmitted by this email including damage from virus." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 14:04:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93075106564A for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 14:04:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kuku@kukulies.org) Received: from werkwelt.de (post.werkwelt.de [91.194.85.74]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34C3E8FC1D for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 14:04:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [87.79.34.228] (account kuku@kukulies.org HELO [172.27.4.215]) by werkwelt.de (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.13) with ESMTPSA id 7071122 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 15:04:42 +0200 Message-ID: <4CA5DC68.6040507@kukulies.org> Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 15:04:40 +0200 From: Christoph Kukulies User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: 5.25" floppy drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 14:04:45 -0000 I'm in the need of reading some data from old 5.25" floppy media (1.2MB). I lent 2 drives from neighbour institutes at the university and after having recalled that the floppies have to be enabled in the BIOS I'm now seeing the fd0 device in dmesg (FreeBSD 8.0 RELEASE). I can do a dd if=/dev/fd0 of=/root/fd0.dmp The select light is lit, the head motor seems to get power but the spindle doesn't spin. I tried that with two TEAC drives to no avail. Any clues what I may have forgotten? The drive is connected with the edge connector and the end is open. Does it need to be terminated? -- Christoph From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 14:11:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2A6E106564A for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 14:11:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@slightlystrange.org) Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org (cpc2-cmbg1-0-0-cust385.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com [82.21.105.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 881738FC08 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 14:11:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dan by catflap.slightlystrange.org with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1P1gKP-000Dr9-HN for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 15:11:13 +0100 Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 15:11:13 +0100 From: Daniel Bye To: User Questions Message-ID: <20101001141113.GD26665@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: User Questions References: <20100930155915.GA26665@catflap.slightlystrange.org> <20101001093632.GC26665@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XvKFcGCOAo53UbWW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-PGP-Fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE amd64 Sender: Daniel Bye Subject: Re: Upgrading autoconf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 14:11:14 -0000 --XvKFcGCOAo53UbWW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 03:02:10PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > > Will migrate it to 8.x soon, by doing a new installation and migratin= g. > > > > > > Or should I wait for FreeBSD-9 ?? > > > > I'd go for 8.x as soon as possible. It'll be a while before 9 is ready = for > > production, and when it is released, it should be pretty straight forwa= rd > > to > > upgrade from 8.x using the standard buildworld cycle, provided your set= up > > isn't too outlandish! > > > > > Update 6.4 to 8.x?? Or you mean some upgrade path like install 8.x and t= hen > migrate services?:-) Since you're crossing two major versions, I'd go for a clean install. You could conceivably go straight to 8 using buildworld, but I think the safest and simplest course of action is to take good backups and start from scratch. As for going from 8.x to 9.x, that should be pretty easy, if, as I said, your setup isn't too far from the default. But of course, only you can make that call.=20 Dan --=20 Daniel Bye _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --XvKFcGCOAo53UbWW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkyl7AEACgkQixf5fBYiFmol/ACfe+QedBdCBCKNlQ7xluutkcLi u6QAoNozvoozgSvF0Kq2EA4fIkG/Le5j =Umsn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XvKFcGCOAo53UbWW-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 14:16:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B78F31065693 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 14:16:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@slightlystrange.org) Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org (cpc2-cmbg1-0-0-cust385.5-4.cable.virginmedia.com [82.21.105.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FC828FC0A for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 14:16:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dan by catflap.slightlystrange.org with local (Exim 4.72 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1P1gPU-000DzA-Ov for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 15:16:28 +0100 Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 15:16:28 +0100 From: Daniel Bye To: Free BSD Questions list Message-ID: <20101001141628.GE26665@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: Free BSD Questions list References: <20101001001926.6ef8aa93@davenulle.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="G6nVm6DDWH/FONJq" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-PGP-Fingerprint: D349 B109 0EB8 2554 4D75 B79A 8B17 F97C 1622 166A X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE amd64 Sender: Daniel Bye Subject: Re: router / firewall with PF and carp. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 14:16:29 -0000 --G6nVm6DDWH/FONJq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 09:40:56AM -0400, Kevin Wilcox wrote: > On 1 October 2010 05:29, krad wrote: >=20 > > In my experiance freebsd should work fine. However I would say openbsd = is > > probably better suited to your needs, due to its tighter security model > > (auditing) >=20 > Krad, I was under the impression that 'audit' from TrustedBSD is built > into FreeBSD. Is there a facility in OpenBSD that is "better" or is > there something in 'audit' that is lacking? I think krad is referring to the well-publicised code audit that the OpenBSD project conducts, rather than the TrustedBSD audit framework. As far as I know, OpenBSD doesn't have anything comparable, but it's a long time since I looked at it, so I might be typing out of me ear... Dan --=20 Daniel Bye _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --G6nVm6DDWH/FONJq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAkyl7TwACgkQixf5fBYiFmquGQCfSg3K9lGGH1CYLt5fN/25XWk0 ZX8AoKfGCJojiP81QUI8/6/8eZ468HYB =i6Ih -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --G6nVm6DDWH/FONJq-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 14:16:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BB771065698 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 14:16:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2F588FC14 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 14:16:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-226-229.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.226.229]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19FE53D16C; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 16:16:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id o91EGiIS001592; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 16:16:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 16:16:44 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Christoph Kukulies Message-Id: <20101001161644.30889075.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4CA5DC68.6040507@kukulies.org> References: <4CA5DC68.6040507@kukulies.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: 5.25" floppy drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 14:16:47 -0000 On Fri, 01 Oct 2010 15:04:40 +0200, Christoph Kukulies wrote: > I'm in the need of reading some data from old 5.25" floppy media (1.2MB). > I lent 2 drives from neighbour institutes at the university and after > having recalled that the > floppies have to be enabled in the BIOS I'm now seeing the fd0 device in > dmesg (FreeBSD 8.0 RELEASE). Similat to this? % dmesg | grep ^fd fdc0: port 0x3f2-0x3f3,0x3f4-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fdc0: [FILTER] fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 This is for a 3.5" drive of course, the 5.25"'s message should read similar. FreeBSD 7 here. > I can do a dd if=/dev/fd0 of=/root/fd0.dmp > > The select light is lit, the head motor seems to get power but the > spindle doesn't spin. > > I tried that with two TEAC drives to no avail. Strange, I would suspect drive electronics first... do you have a "low end" PC (DOS) to check the drives? The lowest level diagnosis tools are often the best. :-) > Any clues what I may have forgotten? The drive is connected with the > edge connector and the end is open. Sounds correct. > Does it need to be terminated? No. The position on the cable selects which "drive letter" will be associated to a given drive; the one on the end is A:, the one on the middle is B:. A single drive is usually connected to the end of the cable. As the connector for 5.25" drive does have a gap, you can't "wrongly connect" it. The connector to the main board should also have a nose that prevents wrong cabling. Wrong cabling is indicated by a permanent (!) activity light on the drive. Instead of using dd, can you maybe access the drive using mount or the mtools (from ports)? If you encounter further problems, I can get a working drive and check here. I'm in a kind of working museum. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 14:34:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7487106566B for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 14:34:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevin.wilcox@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72BB48FC15 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 14:34:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwb15 with SMTP id 15so1452485gwb.13 for ; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 07:34:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=p4ZNAUJ6OekNvjFhEvSnDfErVX0sf3OhRi/9W1KMAUQ=; b=AOokjwQTiCUs0jyLVbxO3AI/je6tsT3Iid9UFuKYiyk3hFPvyhpe/7YdYpLPXcNhAf L5anO9xusug2veoDKrcJDUwB0QooaQX1rkyDeO0lhJUYIqXk1HZg36vXemAUhu5v2h// yc4ajN7ar7ankm/ahiXvTrbI//TOrGhGKlwBs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=GVedVsCQUxAtGJ3rn7XkhDE/giWA7iTjWkIYxrZh0ILavGMHoN7QA+8pGZw5yBkx3M mnO1T992zNu2wvOh7YfpiN9/uuvb3UicGAenHehqHafuBYPwtZ3TTNmJgmhcpxbqKTsJ vk881qWw8uiSgHOWsSbM7P2DTBtNR80PGngLQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.106.15 with SMTP id e15mr1556008agc.71.1285943655798; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 07:34:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.90.10.19 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 07:34:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20101001141628.GE26665@catflap.slightlystrange.org> References: <20101001001926.6ef8aa93@davenulle.org> <20101001141628.GE26665@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 10:34:15 -0400 Message-ID: From: Kevin Wilcox To: Free BSD Questions list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: router / firewall with PF and carp. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 14:34:16 -0000 On 1 October 2010 10:16, Daniel Bye wrote: > On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 09:40:56AM -0400, Kevin Wilcox wrote: >> Krad, I was under the impression that 'audit' from TrustedBSD is built >> into FreeBSD. Is there a facility in OpenBSD that is "better" or is >> there something in 'audit' that is lacking? > I think krad is referring to the well-publicised code audit that the OpenBSD > project conducts, rather than the TrustedBSD audit framework. As far as I > know, OpenBSD doesn't have anything comparable, but it's a long time since I > looked at it, so I might be typing out of me ear... Dan, that makes perfect sense. I'm working up a BSD presentation for the local LUG next week and the latest compare/contrast I was working on was SELinux/GrSecurity/Pax versus TrustedBSD; my brain immediately parsed auditing as an audit trail, not the immense code audit for the base system. Thanks for the reality check!! kmw From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 14:35:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9A981065672 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 14:35:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 571E98FC13 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 14:35:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk8 with SMTP id 8so1750076qyk.13 for ; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 07:35:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=4o04CYTlah/AxEypllB9HtMg4LH83V1PDSwcwobYKxU=; b=HqmlMgnpkbdwG5IzTTjNYjU5W0/tsw3uklvneP7OFaiUq8DoPBPTj3y0xH2X5Wta78 IAtwZeExng3UAAsitqfkvxtFO3lEry86eWHgfroBMfhZh3n0KWU4//2OkXKsl/j2Y7sg SnTuO6oGWLvddmPkH3IcUSNuS1g6GtYI+nInw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=XJXjoQkY43oV8l5LeiOXJOQS/0SyhBexA3+Lol7qdfdWxm4lyNkE35yyHJOzkW/kEL EOdYlRXa1g4EPQlNlI2rT5DIf5O5/2amediPJVXf494bGGPUbWYjLrOL4H1BUaPk3ie6 4BH/EMM+GvSoYabCJsmjWcxxSDVt0DxAMDPZo= Received: by 10.224.28.207 with SMTP id n15mr3783693qac.379.1285943737426; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 07:35:37 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.102.13 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 07:34:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20101001141113.GD26665@catflap.slightlystrange.org> References: <20100930155915.GA26665@catflap.slightlystrange.org> <20101001093632.GC26665@catflap.slightlystrange.org> <20101001141113.GD26665@catflap.slightlystrange.org> From: Odhiambo Washington Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 17:34:53 +0300 Message-ID: To: Daniel Bye , User Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: Upgrading autoconf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 14:35:38 -0000 On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Daniel Bye < freebsd-questions@slightlystrange.org> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 03:02:10PM +0300, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > > > Will migrate it to 8.x soon, by doing a new installation and > migrating. > > > > > > > > Or should I wait for FreeBSD-9 ?? > > > > > > I'd go for 8.x as soon as possible. It'll be a while before 9 is ready > for > > > production, and when it is released, it should be pretty straight > forward > > > to > > > upgrade from 8.x using the standard buildworld cycle, provided your > setup > > > isn't too outlandish! > > > > > > > > Update 6.4 to 8.x?? Or you mean some upgrade path like install 8.x and > then > > migrate services?:-) > > Since you're crossing two major versions, I'd go for a clean install. You > could conceivably go straight to 8 using buildworld, but I think the safest > and simplest course of action is to take good backups and start from > scratch. As for going from 8.x to 9.x, that should be pretty easy, if, as I > said, your setup isn't too far from the default. But of course, only you > can > make that call. > > My servers are pretty easy to migrate. It's just a case of a fresh install, install the applications, migrate the configs and data/databases since I try and keep up to date with the application versions as much as possible. The only thing that changes significantly is the base system. I will go for a clean install. Sometimes back I saw some instructions to upgrade upwards (6.x ->7.x ->8.x) but I cannot find them anymore, although the only time to do those are when the system is in the room next:-) -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ "If you have nothing good to say about someone, just shut up!." -- Lucky Dube From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 14:45:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2C7B106566C for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 14:45:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D1778FC0A for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 14:45:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm9 with SMTP id 9so2662607fxm.13 for ; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 07:45:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=BNbInxhtjIpVGZZGlR2yHVhufJKZMn4mFI11BLnjvn0=; b=l2NMv10j0B+rX9vcR5Zr99To+YF2RAz7BbCnqH2KKwrzC2qix7y2qWe1qPDrKM74jE 9es7Ca5u2Z7FzsWhFwPg0VAvf39v9nWdUUvj5X/SQihNB3KKlZheeEFriAZX1QPrGf8S 79muj2BmS9MWvr/HCn/OUOZE/xUHAKagTVskg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=va4rp+yVmKIMR8uEAfJD3RXNPiLR5HJ9qRIFDuWJr6AScS9YHIdsjAox2HoLo6srhM QA2mmtLXObceF1nxeBAI2MyGBZUdG0M3oJOQkJmIPLD1Sw5C3iis2mth9IeaFVSfIwyc QwjbhoOsLapnpoRSw0b2GwY/jHK58uJs8UQkI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.103.213.8 with SMTP id p8mr2247682muq.105.1285944303076; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 07:45:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.103.68.9 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 07:45:03 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <20101001001926.6ef8aa93@davenulle.org> <20101001141628.GE26665@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 15:45:03 +0100 Message-ID: From: krad To: Kevin Wilcox Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Free BSD Questions list Subject: Re: router / firewall with PF and carp. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 14:45:05 -0000 On 1 October 2010 15:34, Kevin Wilcox wrote: > On 1 October 2010 10:16, Daniel Bye > wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 09:40:56AM -0400, Kevin Wilcox wrote: > > >> Krad, I was under the impression that 'audit' from TrustedBSD is built > >> into FreeBSD. Is there a facility in OpenBSD that is "better" or is > >> there something in 'audit' that is lacking? > > > I think krad is referring to the well-publicised code audit that the > OpenBSD > > project conducts, rather than the TrustedBSD audit framework. As far as I > > know, OpenBSD doesn't have anything comparable, but it's a long time > since I > > looked at it, so I might be typing out of me ear... > > Dan, that makes perfect sense. I'm working up a BSD presentation for > the local LUG next week and the latest compare/contrast I was working > on was SELinux/GrSecurity/Pax versus TrustedBSD; my brain immediately > parsed auditing as an audit trail, not the immense code audit for the > base system. > > Thanks for the reality check!! > > kmw > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I know what you mean, whenever i have worked with SELINUX policies and the bsd MAC framework, it has fried my brain a little 8) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 16:13:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C2C106566C for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 16:13:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 761DF8FC18 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 16:13:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk8 with SMTP id 8so1504696gxk.13 for ; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 09:13:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.37.7 with SMTP id k7mr644222ank.85.1285949619665; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 09:13:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-071-077-039-064.nc.res.rr.com [71.77.39.64]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id w6sm2038490anb.3.2010.10.01.09.13.36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 01 Oct 2010 09:13:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: FreeBSD.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CC1F4E54835 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 12:13:33 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 12:13:32 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20101001121332.5b04fa61@scorpio> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Updating bzip2 to remove potential security vulnerability X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 16:13:40 -0000 I have seen several notices on other forums regarding the update of bzip2 to correct a potential security problem. From the bzip2 web site: The current version is 1.0.6, released 20 Sept 2010. Version 1.0.6 removes a potential security vulnerability, CVE-2010-0405, so all users are recommended to upgrade immediately. The version supplied on FreeBSD-8.1/amd64 is version 1.0.5, 10-Dec-2007. Are there any plans to update this supplied version? -- Jerry ✌ FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 17:14:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE9F7106566B for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 17:14:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from email1.allantgroup.com (email1.emsphone.com [199.67.51.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 853C38FC14 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 17:14:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by email1.allantgroup.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id o91HELUC056066 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 12:14:22 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o91HELri026176 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 12:14:21 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o91HELkx026175 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 12:14:21 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 12:14:20 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20101001171420.GE40148@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20101001121332.5b04fa61@scorpio> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101001121332.5b04fa61@scorpio> X-OS: FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96 at email1.allantgroup.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (email1.allantgroup.com [199.67.51.78]); Fri, 01 Oct 2010 12:14:22 -0500 (CDT) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.45 Subject: Re: Updating bzip2 to remove potential security vulnerability X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 17:14:23 -0000 In the last episode (Oct 01), Jerry said: > I have seen several notices on other forums regarding the update of bzip2 > to correct a potential security problem. From the bzip2 web site: > > > The current version is 1.0.6, released 20 Sept 2010. > > Version 1.0.6 removes a potential security vulnerability, > CVE-2010-0405, so all users are recommended to upgrade immediately. > > > The version supplied on FreeBSD-8.1/amd64 is version 1.0.5, > 10-Dec-2007. Are there any plans to update this supplied version? You must have missed http://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-10:08.bzip2.asc ; patches for 6, 7, and 8 are available there, and freebsd-update has fixed binaries if you use that. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 17:18:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A006106566C for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 17:18:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5716D8FC0C for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 17:18:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o91HIvhn078452; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 11:18:57 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id o91HIv0F078449; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 11:18:57 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 11:18:57 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Christoph Kukulies In-Reply-To: <4CA5DC68.6040507@kukulies.org> Message-ID: References: <4CA5DC68.6040507@kukulies.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 01 Oct 2010 11:18:57 -0600 (MDT) Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: 5.25" floppy drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 17:18:58 -0000 On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, Christoph Kukulies wrote: > I'm in the need of reading some data from old 5.25" floppy media (1.2MB). > I lent 2 drives from neighbour institutes at the university and after having > recalled that the > floppies have to be enabled in the BIOS I'm now seeing the fd0 device in > dmesg (FreeBSD 8.0 RELEASE). > > I can do a dd if=/dev/fd0 of=/root/fd0.dmp > > The select light is lit, the head motor seems to get power but the spindle > doesn't spin. Possibly a drive select issue. Some drives had jumpers or switches, some cables have flipped-around wires so the connectors are specific to one drive or another. If your cabling is straight-through with no funny business at the connectors, set the drive to DS0. If the cable has split out and flipped-over sections, DS1 should be set in the jumpers --but then it depends on which connector is used. ...I think, anyway, it's been a few years since I've had to use a 5.25. > I tried that with two TEAC drives to no avail. > > Any clues what I may have forgotten? The drive is connected with the edge > connector and the end is open. > Does it need to be terminated? None that I've seen. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 18:03:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AE691065675 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 18:03:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mpope@teksavvy.com) Received: from ironport2-out.pppoe.ca (ironport2-out.teksavvy.com [206.248.154.181]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4D5D8FC1C for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 18:03:58 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AnkCACK9pUzO+KvQ/2dsb2JhbAAHoSTKWIVEBIJrghyESIgx X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.57,267,1283745600"; d="scan'208,217";a="77811139" Received: from 206-248-171-208.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO [192.168.111.150]) ([206.248.171.208]) by ironport2-out.pppoe.ca with ESMTP; 01 Oct 2010 13:52:30 -0400 Message-ID: <4CA61FE5.9050306@teksavvy.com> Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 13:52:37 -0400 From: Matthew User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.12) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: BIND: could not configure root hints from 'named.root': file not found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 18:03:59 -0000 Hello, I noticed my email client was taking just over two minutes to start up, with the mail folder being accessed from a share on an NFS server. After rebuilding my workstation (due to h/w heating problems), I deleted my 50,000 emails from freebsd-questions, and ipfw folders. Now the email client opens the NFS share and starts up in under two seconds :) However, now I must use mmsearch at lists.freebsd.org to search mailing list archives. This gives me Internal Server Error on most of my searches, so I decided to post my question here. I have been running a FreeBSD server in my basement for nearly a decade, and like some on this email list, I also ran into trouble when rebuilding my bind environment in a new server environment. (Server ran out of space and my root partition was too small, so I decided to rebuild the box, only to be reminded BIND is tricky to configure.) The BIND files look like Greek to me (no offense intended to Grecians.) Its been at least eight years since I read much of "DNS and Bind" and my copy is now languishing at some former client or employer. I've been reading man pages, handbooks, and the like for days. Here's my immediate problem: After building the server, with jails, before putting BIND in the jail, I decided to get it working in the host FreeBSD environment. # uname -a FreeBSD www.mbpesecurity.com 8.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE #0: Mon Jul 19 02:55:53 UTC 2010 root@almeida.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 From this dir: # pwd /var/named/etc/namedb (symlinked to /etc/namedb) When I start bind: # /etc/rc.d/named onestart Starting named. /etc/rc.d/named: WARNING: failed to start named # pwd /var/named/etc/namedb www# ls named.root named.root Syslogs Show: Oct 1 12:36:35 www named[4663]: starting BIND 9.6.2-P2 -t /var/named -u bind Oct 1 12:36:35 www named[4663]: built with '--prefix=/usr' '--infodir=/usr/share/info' '--mandir=/usr/share/man' '--enable-threads' '--disable-ipv6' '--enable-getifaddrs' '--disable-linux-caps' '--with-openssl=/usr' '--with-randomdev=/dev/random' '--without-idn' '--without-libxml2' Oct 1 12:36:35 www named[4663]: *could not configure root hints from 'named.root': file not found* Oct 1 12:36:35 www named[4663]: loading configuration: file not found Oct 1 12:36:35 www named[4663]: exiting (due to fatal error) Oct 1 12:36:35 www mpope: /etc/rc.d/named: WARNING: failed to start named This perplexes me since 'named.root' is in the starting dir: /etc/namedb, and the 'master' subdir: /etc/namedb/master. # pwd /var/named/etc/namedb (symlinked dir for /etc/namedb) www# ls -ald * drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 Oct 1 12:28 aborted drwxr-xr-x 2 bind wheel 512 Oct 1 12:33 dynamic drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Oct 1 12:36 master -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 1783 Oct 1 12:29 named.conf -rw-r--r-- 1 named named 3082 Sep 30 17:44 *named.root* -rw------- 1 bind wheel 97 Sep 30 17:20 rndc.key drwxr-xr-x 2 bind wheel 512 Oct 1 12:33 slave drwxr-xr-x 2 bind wheel 512 Oct 1 12:36 working # ls master 0.0.127.IN-ADDR.ARPA empty.db *named.root* 171.248.206.IN-ADDR.ARPA mbpesecurity.com db.bind named.localhost Perhaps BIND is actually starting from some other directory? Here is a list of all namedb hits. Since I'm not starting from the jail yet, the only other named dir is in /usr/src/etc/named, the build dir, see listing below. # pwd /var/named/etc/namedb # find / -name namedb /usr/src/etc/namedb <== only other named dir /usr/home/j/mroot/usr/src/etc/namedb = START of JAIL Related dirs /usr/home/j/mroot/var/named/etc/namedb | /usr/home/j/skel/var/named/etc/namedb | /usr/home/j/ns/s/etc/namedb | /usr/home/j/ns/s/var/named/etc/namedb | /usr/home/j/ns/usr/src/etc/namedb | /usr/home/j/ns/var/named/etc/namedb | /usr/home/j/mail/s/var/named/etc/namedb | /usr/home/j/mail/usr/src/etc/namedb | /usr/home/j/mail/var/named/etc/namedb | /usr/home/j/www/s/var/named/etc/namedb | /usr/home/j/www/usr/src/etc/namedb | /usr/home/j/www/var/named/etc/namedb | /usr/home/js/ns/etc/namedb | /usr/home/js/ns/var/named/etc/namedb | /usr/home/js/mail/var/named/etc/namedb V /usr/home/js/www/var/named/etc/namedb = END of JAIL dirs /etc/namedb << -----------------Sym link dest /var/named/etc/namedb <<----------------- Sym link src In the unlikely event BIND were running from the build dir (/usr/src/etc/named), there too the named.root file is found: # cd /usr/src/etc/namedb # pwd /usr/src/etc/namedb # ls -al named.root master/named.root -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 3082 Oct 1 13:27 master/named.root -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 3082 Jun 22 23:56 named.root Here is my (primitive, just to get going) named.conf: I will bring the .conf up to current security standards when I get this primitive version going. * # cat **named.conf* // $FreeBSD: src/etc/namedb/named.conf,v 1.15.2.1 2004/09/30 23:36:07 dougb Exp $ // // Refer to the named.conf(5) and named(8) man pages, and the documentation // in /usr/share/doc/bind9 for more details. // this acl is actually not used as for now we will comein only on 127.0.0.1 acl "rndc-users" { 192.168.111.0/24; 127.0.0.1/24; }; key "rndc-remote" { algorithm hmac-md5; secret "12345671234567"; }; options { directory "."; pid-file "/var/run/named/pid"; dump-file "/var/dump/named_dump.db"; statistics-file "/var/stats/named.stats"; listen-on { 127.0.0.1; 192.168.111.99; 192.168.111.150; }; query-source address * port 53; forwarders { 209.250.128.6; 209.250.128.4; 206.248.154.22; }; }; controls { // localhost - default key inet 127.0.0.1 port 953 allow { localhost; 192.168.111.150; }; inet * port 953 allow {"rndc-users";} keys {"rndc-remote";}; // inet * port 7766 allow {"rndc-users";} keys {"rndc-remote";}; }; // If you enable a local name server, don't forget to enter 127.0.0.1 // first in your /etc/resolv.conf so this server will be queried. // Also, make sure to enable it in /etc/rc.conf. zone "." { type hint; file "named.root"; }; zone "localhost" { type master; file "master/named.localhost"; }; zone "0.0.127.IN-ADDR.ARPA" { type master; file "master/0.0.127.IN-ADDR.ARPA"; }; // Never forget to include the reverse lookup (IN-ADDR.ARPA) zone! // (This is named after the first bytes of the IP address, in reverse // order, with ".IN-ADDR.ARPA" appended.) zone "mbpesecurity.com" { type master; file "master/mbpesecurity.com"; }; zone "171.248.206.IN-ADDR.ARPA" { type master; file "master/171.248.206.IN-ADDR.ARPA"; }; * END cat of named.conf* Here I list the 'file' hits in the .conf file, and list the resultant hits to make sure I have file reference integrity: # grep file named.conf pid-file "/var/run/named/pid"; dump-file "/var/dump/named_dump.db"; statistics-file "/var/stats/named.stats"; file "named.root"; file "master/named.localhost"; file "master/0.0.127.IN-ADDR.ARPA"; file "master/mbpesecurity.com"; file "master/171.248.206.IN-ADDR.ARPA"; # ls named.root master/named.localhost master/0.0.127.IN-ADDR.ARPA master/mbpesecurity.com master/171.248.206.IN-ADDR.ARPA master/0.0.127.IN-ADDR.ARPA master/mbpesecurity.com named.root master/171.248.206.IN-ADDR.ARPA master/named.localhost I would be grateful for any pointers on how to resolve this. I suspect the error message may not be exactly descriptive of whats happening. Thank you, Matthew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 18:33:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFA251065670 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 18:33:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from onemda@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A9C08FC24 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 18:33:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gyg4 with SMTP id 4so1572416gyg.13 for ; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 11:33:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=4K5EgqafgFYsgHW5h+UDLTWq0HiU+xOPVwUFSijrV+o=; b=m99QDXNPwzR0GfdymbSDaTyJLp2cRE3KokgF84iVr0o8gOt4C3QcPRsLNwEtrdnxa9 ar4xPGT85slIorXfA1Tu/w9ybAB7ueXyRVpt4C0SDnAtdWEwzQP5y2bFTSIN41XpAIxy jWVGmPuvMV8EfS1Wfe0YvkosyuJ0cVu6Lmf2A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=CQewOURnau9HnQJuW953YXgvDeoC9Lf25iCTKpk/YL2ST9qv50Fhxrhnze3bxanU74 i2/aBRmEfhg0Pu7Oq8+Wflk/YkS85ACUSwOhb+1z1HVFYBNSj/oJJQNHhSRTV1sbnaUH g3E9OvBPq0TOSR3nab2KmSW/g/5L11j9mLb7Q= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.80.97 with SMTP id s33mr1069448vck.31.1285958010850; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 11:33:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.200.1 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 11:33:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 18:33:30 +0000 Message-ID: From: Paul B Mahol To: Chetan Shukla Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: FW: How to check version of Make in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 18:33:33 -0000 On 10/1/10, Chetan Shukla wrote: > > > Hi All, > > I am working on some code porting activity that wants > Some code to be ported on FreeBSD. > I need to check the version of Make installed in FreeBSD. > make -v does not help here. > What is the similar command in FreeBSD ? gmake. On serious side there is no way to find version and freebsd make havent changed much in years.... I belive that make is still compatible with other BSDs. (well maybe I'm wrong) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 19:05:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D26201065694 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 19:05:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vrwmiller@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 494FC8FC0A for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 19:05:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz15 with SMTP id 15so3171274bwz.13 for ; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 12:05:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:sender:received:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=LIm5OyCrb9kwLwkvV9Po2LAi8GMcDwffipZL8+QSl20=; b=g4Bzvrx5f98dCq3Z1BLIhYXXkfHCOFq5KaywH0IabfcMXVomSmX5KetInlkEQsyXzI 3EqDYFK5DaPQEX2m2nndj5QfE4h8rSERjCHe5KpqaetBd5Mq7+n91xsZFf0Q6C0rfT0T IsKbM10R89D3w//6CGmY4lhRUymGRqGg2jGuY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; b=V+ajrB83QrsKfes1jAh5fYfDRCcxqL0BbZZwMbccTdyl67LIvKBtLgnJC5i5f1yToi a1pynxdN8o5UrBLFJy/h9nxMZQKIrmLaU6gUfI12g6HyYvRM9bMmdpumEqOM9GuCC0TA SuRUYZS9osWmBEXxD7yLDiINCDYQnFQPOWjC0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.126.153 with SMTP id c25mr4462459bks.27.1285959956984; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 12:05:56 -0700 (PDT) Sender: vrwmiller@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.58.18 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 12:05:56 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 15:05:56 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: FmRBM1h24sabhJraPKGD43bn0Jk Message-ID: From: Rick Miller To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: dynamically generating install.cfg X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 19:05:58 -0000 Hello all, I would like to dynamically generate various settings that will be placed into the install.cfg file before sysinstall executes. I am PXE booting and have a mfsroot that contains a install.cfg with variables that will be applicable to all installs. Inside the mfsroot is a script that is supposed to download, via anon-ftp, a file that contains other variables which are set on per host basis. Inside the script, I run ifconfig to setup the interface then immediately run ftp to download the file from the PXE server. As soon as it gets the file, ifconfig runs and takes the interface down. During the install, the debug screen shows no errors when running ifconfig, yet when the script attempts to ftp to the PXE server, it gets a 'network unreachable'. As a result of this, I tried setting up the route as well, using route add default $gateway and get the same error. Running tcpdump on the PXE server confirms that there is not ftp attempt from the client. I am wondering if anyone has tried anything similar and had luck with it or if anyone might be able to provide direction in how I can troubleshoot. I'm not even sure if the interface is being setup properly. At the point where this fails, there is no holographic shell for me to get into and poke around. Thoughts? Ideas? -- Take care Rick Miller From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 20:16:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F3C6106564A for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 20:16:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cyberleo@cyberleo.net) Received: from paka.cyberleo.net (paka.cyberleo.net [66.219.31.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 380FA8FC0A for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 20:16:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.44.4] (dsl253-036-039.chi1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.253.36.39]) by paka.cyberleo.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C3F5628494; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 16:16:28 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <4CA6419C.3050109@cyberleo.net> Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 15:16:28 -0500 From: CyberLeo Kitsana User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100911 Lightning/1.0b3pre Thunderbird/3.1.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matthew References: <4CA61FE5.9050306@teksavvy.com> In-Reply-To: <4CA61FE5.9050306@teksavvy.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND: could not configure root hints from 'named.root': file not found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 20:16:30 -0000 On 10/01/2010 12:52 PM, Matthew wrote: > I would be grateful for any pointers on how to resolve this. I suspect > the error message may not be exactly descriptive of whats happening. Kinda. Here's a few points to keep in mind when working with bind in FreeBSD: * By default, named runs in a chroot jail rooted at /var/named/. * For security reasons, named cannot write to anything in that tree, except the dynamic, slave, and working directories. * named uses its current working directory to resolve relative pathnames in the configuration file. * With a recent change to ISC Bind 9, named started complaining if it couldn't write to its current working directory. At the time, this was (chroot)/etc/namedb/; this was subsequently changed to (chroot)/etc/namedb/working/ to make named happy without compromising security. When the working directory for named was (chroot)/etc/namedb/, everything was peachy. Since this was changed, relative pathnames no longer work as expected because the reference point is different. The easiest solution is to alter your configuration file to include only absolute pathnames, relative to the root of the jail. The default named config file (in /var/named/etc/namedb/named.conf) is an excellent source of examples for this. -- Fuzzy love, -CyberLeo Technical Administrator CyberLeo.Net Webhosting http://www.CyberLeo.Net Furry Peace! - http://wwww.fur.com/peace/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 20:59:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 854EA106566C for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 20:59:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 368A18FC1B for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 20:59:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxn35 with SMTP id 35so1626597yxn.13 for ; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 13:59:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.110.16 with SMTP id t16mr4071491yhg.84.1285966784699; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 13:59:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-071-077-039-064.nc.res.rr.com [71.77.39.64]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id p16sm1168055ybk.11.2010.10.01.13.59.42 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 01 Oct 2010 13:59:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: FreeBSD.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9F6C6E54835 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 16:59:41 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 16:59:40 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20101001165940.5d0e73f5@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20101001171420.GE40148@dan.emsphone.com> References: <20101001121332.5b04fa61@scorpio> <20101001171420.GE40148@dan.emsphone.com> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAG1BMVEX3/uPVnZf2/v9ejGkqHB74++H///+cHCT3m6cgqYvfAAACbElEQVQ4jWXTQW/bIBQAYJLJuRMn8TVCss9zTdrrXJ6bHe1Ej/bossF9EpJ3nbapf3sP8JxOQ4qV8OU9HvjBROWcYNlKHtxlQ1/huBaOBiMwQtgHhbokMLIT76Acps5hvy61+6WsjkCZzNEW0+fcQ7Nl5uoPCegjjjhN5/MEABd89k9hXkQoX6cwPIDKCt8tYG5wpmdrxAyuolTPqpiVoEpVCWvl6e00RAD4JBJQnO4lvv0O4Cnd3WUGevYNFohxFYAy7jCCtW39LaQK8BgDAgiHVinVJlCiFKlcqgEHfwb1EuG+DwFGMO3oCIuJIEYoa8KJECBB+UBldgm0MQmEGz7GQr8XYRPKzYNO1zZ8mgdAu4BG5Ke/4KFboM8458UScViAAvYD93OAsu+Bc3zxCU7ZAjT74+dQv9K7oO0d1wuscop48Pc50O5bcVwgGzh/mXzaizJuAWERh8k3eaxKmxu4kV1p2XOEg3i3c8M+EKR93P0D1KATpC55vMHaGqFf5f/AwhlrhHgg8DTezopt6I3o3Qx4q4q6YaPxK8RxcClXeFGhTTS++QR6TS/oBs7l4WhzuNMubZG6hIBkF4qqZVdWczIqSrjKVF/i4o26IP2oElBGFy5CXKSnf6UWDTC6zKSqoAvzsakjjBvdzLKnmxdhY8eRsX7VSCUBdgD1hVJpx6y2OOS1DNDILYmqdWUJ+oHvd0rRvAqX5kpxQMR6yxHzPV6VlPFyWE7LKc36keNQI64gLP8Ybgtmg+zYuBl4fuI8VqW2RqDGE8Uzu7GxGa803whDdxx3bSZbRhfQUSxvmnpLZWpRFqHz7v8AvsBe0S1zv9UAAAAASUVORK5CYII= Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Updating bzip2 to remove potential security vulnerability X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 20:59:47 -0000 On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 12:14:20 -0500 Dan Nelson articulated: > You must have missed > http://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-10:08.bzip2.asc ; > patches for 6, 7, and 8 are available there, and freebsd-update has > fixed binaries if you use that. Never saw it. So I am assuming that simply using something like: csup -L2 -h cvsup.FreeBSD.org "/usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/standard-supfile" Then rebuild Kernel & World is not going to work. Is that correct? -- Jerry ✌ FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ Last week a cop stopped me in my car. He asked me if I had a police record. I said, no, but I have the new DEVO album. Cops have no sense of humor. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 21:04:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 006C3106566C for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 21:04:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhelfman@e-e.com) Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (mail.experts-exchange.com [72.29.183.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCEE98FC19 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 21:04:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.experts-exchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73829F2F43F for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 14:04:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=e-e.com; h= user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type :content-type:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:subject :from:from:date:date:received:received:received; s=ee; t= 1285967064; x=1287781464; bh=2Zz/SwHKIK/qL003qwmxV6TvRammYaMo/bs pEtSVYlk=; b=GeHd6ns6XPK8rNup9QVwJhSpZ1uOhVB8N40hJoekRHsbv/VTUjY fcFH/wHrpVvIJhYqR17yyP/A7g6706VxZTedn4gyCS29A30dh8DDUeDGYd0SUHJe /UNeEWYejC4ffrYAbATglwAHVfZZr7oQw59LjA4IJu5pDi2VWtSicnRE= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at experts-exchange.com Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.experts-exchange.com (mail.experts-exchange.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PItHCqYL-tUW for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 14:04:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eggman.experts-exchange.com (unknown [192.168.103.122]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jhelfman) by mail.experts-exchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0C0ECF2F430 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 14:03:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by eggman.experts-exchange.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 01 Oct 2010 14:00:16 -0700 Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 14:00:16 -0700 From: Jason To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20101001210014.GD86640@eggman.experts-exchange.com> References: <20101001121332.5b04fa61@scorpio> <20101001171420.GE40148@dan.emsphone.com> <20101001165940.5d0e73f5@scorpio> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101001165940.5d0e73f5@scorpio> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE-p2 X-Living-The-Dream: I love the SLO Life! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: Updating bzip2 to remove potential security vulnerability X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 21:04:43 -0000 On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 04:59:40PM -0400, Jerry thus spake: >On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 12:14:20 -0500 >Dan Nelson articulated: > >> You must have missed >> http://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-10:08.bzip2.asc ; >> patches for 6, 7, and 8 are available there, and freebsd-update has >> fixed binaries if you use that. > >Never saw it. So I am assuming that simply using something like: > >csup -L2 -h cvsup.FreeBSD.org "/usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/standard-supfile" > >Then rebuild Kernel & World is not going to work. Is that correct? The update instructions are in the announcement. Here is a snippet from it: a) Download the relevant patch from the location below, and verify the detached PGP signature using your PGP utility. # fetch http://security.FreeBSD.org/patches/SA-10:08/bzip2.patch # fetch http://security.FreeBSD.org/patches/SA-10:08/bzip2.patch.asc b) Execute the following commands as root: # cd /usr/src # patch < /path/to/patch # cd /usr/src/lib/libbz2 # make obj && make depend && make && make install NOTE: On the amd64 platform, the above procedure will not update the lib32 (i386 compatibility) libraries. On amd64 systems where the i386 compatibility libraries are used, the operating system should instead be recompiled as described in 3) To update your vulnerable system via a binary patch: Systems running 6.4-RELEASE, 7.1-RELEASE, 7.3-RELEASE, 8.0-RELEASE or 8.1-RELEASE on the i386 or amd64 platforms can be updated via the freebsd-update(8) utility: # freebsd-update fetch # freebsd-update install From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 21:07:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DD92106566B for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 21:07:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dteske@vicor.com) Received: from postoffice.vicor.com (postoffice.vicor.com [69.26.56.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 647128FC08 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 21:07:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [208.206.78.30] (port=46142 helo=dt.vicor.com) by postoffice.vicor.com with esmtpsa (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P1mot-0002w8-Ku; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 14:07:09 -0700 From: Devin Teske To: Paul B Mahol In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Vicor, Inc Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 14:07:07 -0700 Message-Id: <1285967227.14091.70.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-41.el4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scan-Signature: 9bcc5357c98361c84ec36ed58ff5887f X-Scan-Host: postoffice.vicor.com Cc: Chetan Shukla , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: FW: How to check version of Make in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 21:07:10 -0000 On 10/1/10, Chetan Shukla wrote: > > I need to check the version of Make installed in FreeBSD. > > make -v does not help here. > > What is the similar command in FreeBSD ? > > On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 18:33 +0000, Paul B Mahol wrote: > gmake. On serious side there is no way to find version and -- Cheers, Devin Teske -> CONTACT INFORMATION <- Business Solutions Consultant II FIS - fisglobal.com 510-735-5650 Mobile 510-621-2038 Office 510-621-2020 Office Fax 909-477-4578 Home/Fax devin.teske@fisglobal.com -> LEGAL DISCLAIMER <- This message contains confidential and proprietary information of the sender, and is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the e-mail sender immediately, and delete the original message without making a copy. -> END TRANSMISSION <- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 21:18:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5AE3106566C for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 21:18:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dteske@vicor.com) Received: from postoffice.vicor.com (postoffice.vicor.com [69.26.56.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4CD48FC19 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 21:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [208.206.78.30] (port=46189 helo=dt.vicor.com) by postoffice.vicor.com with esmtpsa (SSLv3:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P1mzv-00034E-1V; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 14:18:32 -0700 From: Devin Teske To: Paul B Mahol In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Vicor, Inc Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 14:18:30 -0700 Message-Id: <1285967910.14091.81.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 (2.0.2-41.el4) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scan-Signature: efdea25ac67ffe5db13eca44ff0ee10f X-Scan-Host: postoffice.vicor.com Cc: Chetan Shukla , Devin Teske , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: FW: How to check version of Make in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 21:18:47 -0000 On 10/1/10, Chetan Shukla wrote: > > I need to check the version of Make installed in FreeBSD. > > make -v does not help here. > > What is the similar command in FreeBSD ? > > On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 18:33 +0000, Paul B Mahol wrote: > gmake. On serious side there is no way to find version and > freebsd make havent changed much in years... On the command-line... strings `which make` | grep -B1 MAKE_VERSION Or in a makefile... /usr/tmp/Makefile: all: @echo "MAKE_VERSION='$(MAKE_VERSION)'" make MAKE_VERSION='5200408120' -- Cheers, Devin Teske -> CONTACT INFORMATION <- Business Solutions Consultant II FIS - fisglobal.com 510-735-5650 Mobile 510-621-2038 Office 510-621-2020 Office Fax 909-477-4578 Home/Fax devin.teske@fisglobal.com -> LEGAL DISCLAIMER <- This message contains confidential and proprietary information of the sender, and is intended only for the person(s) to whom it is addressed. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by any other person is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the e-mail sender immediately, and delete the original message without making a copy. -> END TRANSMISSION <- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 21:23:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78C551065675 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 21:23:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (unknown [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D73F8FC1A for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 21:23:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8C7FE615F; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 22:23:21 +0100 (BST) Received: from unknown (client-82-31-11-222.midd.adsl.virginmedia.com [82.31.11.222]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 22:23:20 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 22:23:16 +0100 From: Bruce Cran To: Jason Message-ID: <20101001222316.00004e8c@unknown> In-Reply-To: <20101001210014.GD86640@eggman.experts-exchange.com> References: <20101001121332.5b04fa61@scorpio> <20101001171420.GE40148@dan.emsphone.com> <20101001165940.5d0e73f5@scorpio> <20101001210014.GD86640@eggman.experts-exchange.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i586-pc-mingw32msvc) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD , Jerry Subject: Re: Updating bzip2 to remove potential security vulnerability X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 21:23:23 -0000 On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 14:00:16 -0700 Jason wrote: > On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 04:59:40PM -0400, Jerry thus spake: > >On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 12:14:20 -0500 > >Dan Nelson articulated: > > > >> You must have missed > >> http://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-10:08.bzip2.asc ; > >> patches for 6, 7, and 8 are available there, and freebsd-update has > >> fixed binaries if you use that. > > > >Never saw it. So I am assuming that simply using something like: > > > >csup -L2 -h cvsup.FreeBSD.org > >"/usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/standard-supfile" > > > >Then rebuild Kernel & World is not going to work. Is that correct? > > The update instructions are in the announcement. Here is a snippet > from it: Or yes, you can just update to the latest sources via csup - it's been fixed in all supported security branches as well as HEAD (see http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/releng/8.1/UPDATING?view=log for example). -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 21:27:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE40106566B for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 21:27:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-pz0-f54.google.com (mail-pz0-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A09D48FC0C for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 21:27:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk1 with SMTP id 1so69457pzk.13 for ; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 14:27:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.217.17 with SMTP id p17mr5324097wfg.65.1285968391277; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 14:26:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-071-077-039-064.nc.res.rr.com [71.77.39.64]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m4sm718650vcg.0.2010.10.01.14.26.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 01 Oct 2010 14:26:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: FreeBSD.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2AAB8E54835 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 17:26:28 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 17:26:27 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20101001172627.395ce647@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20101001210014.GD86640@eggman.experts-exchange.com> References: <20101001121332.5b04fa61@scorpio> <20101001171420.GE40148@dan.emsphone.com> <20101001165940.5d0e73f5@scorpio> <20101001210014.GD86640@eggman.experts-exchange.com> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Updating bzip2 to remove potential security vulnerability X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 21:27:15 -0000 On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 14:00:16 -0700 Jason articulated: > On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 04:59:40PM -0400, Jerry thus spake: > >On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 12:14:20 -0500 > >Dan Nelson articulated: > > > >> You must have missed > >> http://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-10:08.bzip2.asc ; > >> patches for 6, 7, and 8 are available there, and freebsd-update has > >> fixed binaries if you use that. > > > >Never saw it. So I am assuming that simply using something like: > > > >csup -L2 -h cvsup.FreeBSD.org > >"/usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/standard-supfile" > > > >Then rebuild Kernel & World is not going to work. Is that correct? > > The update instructions are in the announcement. Here is a snippet > from it: > > a) Download the relevant patch from the location below, and verify the > detached PGP signature using your PGP utility. > > # fetch http://security.FreeBSD.org/patches/SA-10:08/bzip2.patch > # fetch http://security.FreeBSD.org/patches/SA-10:08/bzip2.patch.asc > > b) Execute the following commands as root: > > # cd /usr/src > # patch < /path/to/patch > # cd /usr/src/lib/libbz2 > # make obj && make depend && make && make install > > NOTE: On the amd64 platform, the above procedure will not update the > lib32 (i386 compatibility) libraries. On amd64 systems where the i386 > compatibility libraries are used, the operating system should instead > be recompiled as described in > > > 3) To update your vulnerable system via a binary patch: > > Systems running 6.4-RELEASE, 7.1-RELEASE, 7.3-RELEASE, 8.0-RELEASE or > 8.1-RELEASE on the i386 or amd64 platforms can be updated via the > freebsd-update(8) utility: > > # freebsd-update fetch > # freebsd-update install I all ready read that. If you reread my post, I was inquiring about simply downloading the source tree and then rebuilding world. The portion regarding amd64 systems pertains to me. Notice: On the amd64 platform, the above procedure will not update the > lib32 (i386 compatibility) libraries. On amd64 systems where the i386 > compatibility libraries are used, the operating system should instead > be recompiled as described in > Am I to infer that I could simply download the sources and rebuild world, or do I have to download the patches first? It would appear that I can simply update the sources and rebuild my kernel & world. Your post failed to address the question I posed. -- Jerry ✌ FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 21:49:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03D1710656B2 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 21:49:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A78AC8FC15 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 21:49:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxn35 with SMTP id 35so1647753yxn.13 for ; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 14:49:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.75.200 with SMTP id z8mr1562612vcj.57.1285969772506; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 14:49:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-071-077-039-064.nc.res.rr.com [71.77.39.64]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f17sm1324264vbf.12.2010.10.01.14.49.31 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 01 Oct 2010 14:49:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: FreeBSD.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DB5E7E54835 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 17:49:29 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 17:49:29 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20101001174929.16d43ac1@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20101001222316.00004e8c@unknown> References: <20101001121332.5b04fa61@scorpio> <20101001171420.GE40148@dan.emsphone.com> <20101001165940.5d0e73f5@scorpio> <20101001210014.GD86640@eggman.experts-exchange.com> <20101001222316.00004e8c@unknown> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Updating bzip2 to remove potential security vulnerability X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 21:49:34 -0000 On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 22:23:16 +0100 Bruce Cran articulated: > On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 14:00:16 -0700 > Jason wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 04:59:40PM -0400, Jerry thus spake: > > >On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 12:14:20 -0500 > > >Dan Nelson articulated: > > > > > >> You must have missed > > >> http://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-10:08.bzip2.asc ; > > >> patches for 6, 7, and 8 are available there, and freebsd-update > > >> has fixed binaries if you use that. > > > > > >Never saw it. So I am assuming that simply using something like: > > > > > >csup -L2 -h cvsup.FreeBSD.org > > >"/usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/standard-supfile" > > > > > >Then rebuild Kernel & World is not going to work. Is that correct? > > > > The update instructions are in the announcement. Here is a snippet > > from it: > > Or yes, you can just update to the latest sources via csup - it's been > fixed in all supported security branches as well as HEAD (see > http://svn.freebsd.org/viewvc/base/releng/8.1/UPDATING?view=log for > example). OK, I just updated my sources; however, this notation from the UPDATING file does NOT appear in the UPDATING file on my machine: 20100920: p1 FreeBSD-SA-10:08.bzip2 Fix an integer overflow in RLE length parsing when decompressing corrupt bzip2 data. I am using this as the tag, which is probably incorrect. default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8 This is the stock standard-supfile. The stock stable-supfile has the same tag. -- Jerry ✌ FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 22:16:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6ED2106566B for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 22:16:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (unknown [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73EB68FC08 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 22:16:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDEC0E6097; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 23:16:20 +0100 (BST) Received: from unknown (client-82-31-11-222.midd.adsl.virginmedia.com [82.31.11.222]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 23:16:20 +0100 (BST) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 23:16:15 +0100 From: Bruce Cran To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20101001231615.00007859@unknown> In-Reply-To: <20101001174929.16d43ac1@scorpio> References: <20101001121332.5b04fa61@scorpio> <20101001171420.GE40148@dan.emsphone.com> <20101001165940.5d0e73f5@scorpio> <20101001210014.GD86640@eggman.experts-exchange.com> <20101001222316.00004e8c@unknown> <20101001174929.16d43ac1@scorpio> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i586-pc-mingw32msvc) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd.user@seibercom.net Subject: Re: Updating bzip2 to remove potential security vulnerability X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 22:16:21 -0000 On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 17:49:29 -0400 Jerry wrote: > OK, I just updated my sources; however, this notation from the > UPDATING file does NOT appear in the UPDATING file on my machine: > > 20100920: p1 FreeBSD-SA-10:08.bzip2 > Fix an integer overflow in RLE length parsing when > decompressing corrupt bzip2 data. > > I am using this as the tag, which is probably incorrect. > > default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8 > > This is the stock standard-supfile. The stock stable-supfile has the > same tag. > Sorry, it seems stable/8 UPDATING hasn't been updated. Instead, check that you have rev 1.1.1.5.2.1 of contrib/bzip2/decompress.c . I guess that since -stable isn't a release branch that it doesn't get security issues logged in UPDATING? -- Bruce From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 22:33:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98732106566C for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 22:33:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from onemda@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F588FC13 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 22:33:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwb15 with SMTP id 15so1664133gwb.13 for ; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 15:33:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=qyMrZma8Pt2ToZ6B8Gd0qXuAPjbXkRVZYd+60OA1+hQ=; b=nVE/LOIvkc9CmxXPI3I1qdc+9vuqg1PuKmKSu1GldsUl6U6JRcd8xTh5b7wjOoPwEN zo44Yhkowq6Z8oHlzgtDmg3M7zkj8vAFs9yVbwaBIbwyO4lT4ttev005pDNJJQ0pF20E PhfUDX9Anh9MDrUUbx9uLRJQVHux9w2KwbbDc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=XKxvXby0shvF8j54NTI8pTHzIqFNLln4MDjPiYsytlOs6sDKzznZObeK7K64ReRxTV II3sJ/rV7T3V/EI/+/AirX2DfTpUTXxhMPp8WlljrUgGXNvYcmb92Zz84mjEEiocqbZw MhVKVDVlvolDtyNQVnZVR2bMYKpgWJhRblkG8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.157.139 with SMTP id b11mr1512312vcx.180.1285972400310; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 15:33:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.200.1 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 15:33:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1285967910.14091.81.camel@localhost.localdomain> References: <1285967910.14091.81.camel@localhost.localdomain> Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 22:33:20 +0000 Message-ID: From: Paul B Mahol To: Devin Teske Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Chetan Shukla , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: FW: How to check version of Make in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 22:33:21 -0000 On 10/1/10, Devin Teske wrote: > On 10/1/10, Chetan Shukla wrote: >> > I need to check the version of Make installed in FreeBSD. >> > make -v does not help here. >> > What is the similar command in FreeBSD ? >> >> On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 18:33 +0000, Paul B Mahol wrote: >> gmake. On serious side there is no way to find version and >> freebsd make havent changed much in years... > > On the command-line... > > strings `which make` | grep -B1 MAKE_VERSION > > Or in a makefile... > > /usr/tmp/Makefile: > all: > @echo "MAKE_VERSION='$(MAKE_VERSION)'" > > make > MAKE_VERSION='5200408120' Nice. > > -- > Cheers, > Devin Teske > > -> CONTACT INFORMATION <- > Business Solutions Consultant II > FIS - fisglobal.com > 510-735-5650 Mobile > 510-621-2038 Office > 510-621-2020 Office Fax > 909-477-4578 Home/Fax > devin.teske@fisglobal.com > > -> LEGAL DISCLAIMER <- > This message contains confidential and proprietary information > of the sender, and is intended only for the person(s) to whom it > is addressed. Any use, distribution, copying or disclosure by any > other person is strictly prohibited. If you have received this > message in error, please notify the e-mail sender immediately, > and delete the original message without making a copy. > > -> END TRANSMISSION <- > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 22:34:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25FE8106564A for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 22:34:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D184F8FC22 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 22:34:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P1oB6-0007Zn-QY for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 00:34:08 +0200 Received: from pool-173-79-85-36.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([173.79.85.36]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 00:34:08 +0200 Received: from nightrecon by pool-173-79-85-36.washdc.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 00:34:08 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Followup-To: gmane.os.freebsd.questions Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 18:36:51 -0400 Lines: 23 Message-ID: References: <20101001121332.5b04fa61@scorpio> <20101001171420.GE40148@dan.emsphone.com> <20101001165940.5d0e73f5@scorpio> <20101001210014.GD86640@eggman.experts-exchange.com> <20101001222316.00004e8c@unknown> <20101001174929.16d43ac1@scorpio> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-173-79-85-36.washdc.fios.verizon.net Subject: Re: Updating bzip2 to remove potential security vulnerability X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 22:34:10 -0000 Jerry wrote: [snip]. > > OK, I just updated my sources; however, this notation from the UPDATING > file does NOT appear in the UPDATING file on my machine: > > 20100920: p1 FreeBSD-SA-10:08.bzip2 > Fix an integer overflow in RLE length parsing when decompressing > corrupt bzip2 data. > > I am using this as the tag, which is probably incorrect. > > default release=cvs tag=RELENG_8 > > This is the stock standard-supfile. The stock stable-supfile has the > same tag. > The security tag for a release version is either RELENG_8_0 or RELENG_8_1, depending on which one you run. UPDATING has the entry wrt to these. -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 22:57:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ABD0106564A for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 22:57:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: from ns1.thought.org (plato.thought.org [209.180.213.209]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D308FC13 for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 22:57:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thought.org (tao.thought.org [10.47.0.250]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns1.thought.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o91MvIMu004706; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 15:57:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kline@thought.org) Received: by thought.org (nbSMTP-1.00) for uid 1002 kline@thought.org; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 15:57:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 15:57:17 -0700 From: Gary Kline To: Greg Larkin Message-ID: <20101001225717.GA83457@thought.org> References: <20100928162839.GA32198@thought.org> <7B0DAD9C-ED75-4188-9407-F86F44C94F47@cwis.biz> <19639A29-A22D-474B-8CD6-E62D2A4CCB15@cwis.biz> <4CA2D921.2080402@ose.nl> <20100929202423.GB13004@thought.org> <4CA3AC31.2060703@radel.com> <4CA3EB8B.3050701@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4CA3EB8B.3050701@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: With 24 years of service to the Unix community. X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.9 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on ethic.thought.org Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, Jon Radel Subject: Re: what is from [sic (wrong)] with this picture? -- Answer: It's Ubuntu, not FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 22:57:24 -0000 On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 09:44:43PM -0400, Greg Larkin wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Jon Radel wrote: > > On 9/29/10 4:24 PM, Gary Kline wrote: > >> Yes! changing the line in main.cf lets things get thru to my > >> server cleanly, thanks for the tip. I still don't understand > >> what's wrong with my DNS files. Hopefully, other folk on-list > >> will see what's messed up. > > > > Your domain registrar is having your dns delegated to 3 nameservers: > > > > thought.org. 86400 IN NS ns1.thought.org. > > thought.org. 86400 IN NS ns1.silvertree.org. > > thought.org. 86400 IN NS ns1.twisted4life.com. > > ;; Received 142 bytes from 2001:500:48::1#53(b2.org.afilias-nst.org) in > > 32 ms > > > > The last of the 3, ns1.twisted4life.com, is of the opinion that your > > domain doesn't exist, given that it has no authoritative data and > > refuses to do recursive lookups for the Internet at large. I would > > suspect that this would result in the coming and going visibility that > > others have reported. Basically, you don't exist a third of the time. > > > > You need to make sure that all the nameservers you list with your > > registrar are actually admitting to your existence and are getting > > up-to-date data. I recall having this conversation with you before. > > > > The first thing I would do is check the results of the DNS scan here > (http://www.dnscog.com/report/thought.org) and fix all of the listed > problems. Keep iterating until the report is clean, or at least doesn't > have any red flags on it. I've used this service successfully for a > while now to debug DNS problems. > > Hope that helps, > Greg > - -- > Greg Larkin > Well, long-story-short, yes and no. I changed the IP addr to the same as my firewall's and was able to ping ns1.thought.org .... but that created other errors that I didn't understand. Plus, it disabled mail both incoming and outgoing. Back to square 0. gary > -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org http://www.thought.org Public Service Unix The 7.83a release of Jottings: http://jottings.thought.org/index.php http://journey.thought.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 1 23:45:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70FA1106566B for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 23:45:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB838FC0A for ; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 23:45:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn34 with SMTP id 34so5439984iwn.13 for ; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 16:45:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=rYOdkVdgNGmTCIX6osx7r32LleAuDQsHyt3Fyb6LTtE=; b=jXDnjyh7ulpCbsZUr5vS7Pu66B6wmyofXOSqK/CYi+LiCHt04c8iTyhuM2UY7XJrm7 gLFA3J60L1WYESBX5ayMWbFKeNbGruf5dbeMV7wu5Dn7R+cpPy95afYZENOrjjOPUPf7 bv3am/P61IySkDJvycsNOLLVLYQu++vo23Bvg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=aj9RBcpxBsC5l9eLkIV0vFX9DNwcG/zRiUF7SzOSGOK0nutMoZPxlYNb9oWEC4uqiw xr5lBlbHfXeBWOaGYcCA1Hday7FPLkn+JC+zaqfxU3JW2CJ2TypEh/iwF5B1zfCSKsY/ KArzUffF8Y8WCQWof/fMVAxjPfsS7hGDMZ7W4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.59.212 with SMTP id m20mr6442687ibh.130.1285976746544; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 16:45:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.185.22 with HTTP; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 16:45:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 16:45:46 -0700 Message-ID: From: Kurt Buff To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Subject: Freebsd-update not working for me X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 23:45:47 -0000 Weird little problem here... I've got a 7.1-RELEASE box I'm trying to get to 8.1-RELEASE. I was able to do 'freebsd-update -install' and get the security patches and all, but 'freebsd-update -r 8.1-RELEASE upgrade' fails - see output below. Can anyone point me in the right direction to start troubleshooting this? I don't see anything in /var/log/messages. Kurt netmon/root 23:47 2010-09-30 root 0# freebsd-update -r 8.1-RELEASE upgrade Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found. Fetching metadata signature for 7.1-RELEASE from update2.FreeBSD.org... done. Fetching metadata index... done. Fetching 1 metadata patches. done. Applying metadata patches... done. Fetching 1 metadata files... done. Inspecting system... done. The following components of FreeBSD seem to be installed: kernel/generic src/base src/bin src/cddl src/contrib src/crypto src/etc src/games src/gnu src/include src/krb5 src/lib src/libexec src/release src/rescue src/sbin src/secure src/share src/sys src/tools src/ubin src/usbin world/base world/catpages world/dict world/doc world/games world/info world/manpages The following components of FreeBSD do not seem to be installed: world/proflibs Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y Fetching metadata signature for 8.1-RELEASE from update2.FreeBSD.org... done. Fetching metadata index... done. Fetching 1 metadata patches. done. Applying metadata patches... done. Fetching 1 metadata files... done. Inspecting system... done. Fetching files from 7.1-RELEASE for merging... done. Preparing to download files... done. Fetching 16008 patches.. done. Applying patches... done. Fetching 36199 files... failed. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 05:34:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 254CC106566C for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 05:34:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnemmi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D136E8FC1A for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 05:34:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxn35 with SMTP id 35so1712305yxn.13 for ; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 22:34:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8dAMyziYoJ2cK9SVhAfqP3cz0zo5NM5zRZanx85w3KE=; b=qY1up70cx63GkBAZo0+D4YNocDLZfMzOMsnuGuxLv+A2pBHyd2jSJKGdVSsGZXR7nN 5qNz9mEmZGSHLGxOKX5t91wvG68u9QAfQBCjP4jiegM7nrshqjrZyt6gVYQcH263tqj5 DJW/zJH+6zgPw7H21V90JYI2s7pAl4FZNhOU0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=H7UoK5FeijSHUmnQQyz3pucM+O6o+Lw1Q9F3vAkZt4+vNpws3XkNk6ohsA1yCkVQzD ySZjkDN335a1mrlicQoTVtdbCAgJoPp5YjP0trwjpkp3CeSHFlnjFZ0Jgy8y6w/RnlJM lvrgv5bAlpf4qLx2Io/QFAS5PZg+RWDwkOv+U= Received: by 10.101.6.22 with SMTP id j22mr1731170ani.153.1285997645050; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 22:34:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.5] ([190.230.73.211]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i25sm3273812anh.37.2010.10.01.22.34.03 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 01 Oct 2010 22:34:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CA6C448.90602@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 02:34:00 -0300 From: Gonzalo Nemmi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; es-AR; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4C8316C5.2060906@gmail.com> <4C9F7589.5090707@lecuire.fr> In-Reply-To: <4C9F7589.5090707@lecuire.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Compaq mini CQ10 anyone? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 05:34:06 -0000 El 26/09/2010 01:32 p.m., BernardL escribió: > Le 05/09/2010 06:04, Gonzalo Nemmi a écrit : >> I just got one and was wondering if anyone was running FreeBSD on it >> and how well does it work out of the box. >> All comments are welcome. >> > I have one with FreeBSD 8.1. Some difficulties to install X11 (I had to > use Driver "vesa" instead of "intel" in the section "Device" of > xorg.config). And the internal Wifi device is not recognized by FreeBSD. > Regards > Bernard Lecuire Hi there Bernard and thanks for your comment! Can you tell me if suspend to ram (acpiconf -s3) works on the mini CQ10-120?, although I presume it doesn´t work that well, or at all, if you had to use "vesa" instead of the "intel" driver ... I would expect that would cause the screen not to come back after suspend and ACPI is my main concern in my netbook. Are you loading the i915 driver in your /boot/loader.conf? Thanks a lot and my best regards Gonzalo Nemmi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 05:38:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB7E1065679 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 05:38:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhelfman@e-e.com) Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (mail.experts-exchange.com [72.29.183.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76BCE8FC12 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 05:38:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.experts-exchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48F44F2F24F; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 22:23:21 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at experts-exchange.com Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.experts-exchange.com (mail.experts-exchange.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02VnEzLvd3OV; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 22:23:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from eggman.experts-exchange.com (unknown [63.201.14.91]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jhelfman) by mail.experts-exchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F186F2F1E3; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 22:23:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: by eggman.experts-exchange.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, _d Oct 2010 22:25:22 -0700 Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 22:25:22 -0700 From: Jason To: Kurt Buff Message-ID: <20101002052522.GA62385@Jason-Helfmans-MacBook-Pro.local> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: Darwin 10.4.0 X-Living-The-Dream: I love the SLO Life! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Freebsd-update not working for me X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 05:38:50 -0000 On Fri, Oct 01, 2010 at 04:45:46PM -0700, Kurt Buff thus spake: >Weird little problem here... > >I've got a 7.1-RELEASE box I'm trying to get to 8.1-RELEASE. I was >able to do 'freebsd-update -install' and get the security patches and >all, but 'freebsd-update -r 8.1-RELEASE upgrade' fails - see output >below. Can anyone point me in the right direction to start >troubleshooting this? I don't see anything in /var/log/messages. You may want to see how many files you have downloaded under /var/db/freebsd-update. The patches were applied. It appears it was only an issue of getting more files. As the program is running you can do an ls under /var/db/freebsd-update to see how many files are being downloaded. Have you tried running the command again? -jgh > >Kurt > >netmon/root 23:47 2010-09-30 root 0# freebsd-update -r 8.1-RELEASE upgrade >Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 4 mirrors found. >Fetching metadata signature for 7.1-RELEASE from update2.FreeBSD.org... done. >Fetching metadata index... done. >Fetching 1 metadata patches. done. >Applying metadata patches... done. >Fetching 1 metadata files... done. >Inspecting system... done. > >The following components of FreeBSD seem to be installed: >kernel/generic src/base src/bin src/cddl src/contrib src/crypto src/etc >src/games src/gnu src/include src/krb5 src/lib src/libexec src/release >src/rescue src/sbin src/secure src/share src/sys src/tools src/ubin >src/usbin world/base world/catpages world/dict world/doc world/games >world/info world/manpages > >The following components of FreeBSD do not seem to be installed: >world/proflibs > >Does this look reasonable (y/n)? y > >Fetching metadata signature for 8.1-RELEASE from update2.FreeBSD.org... done. >Fetching metadata index... done. >Fetching 1 metadata patches. done. >Applying metadata patches... done. >Fetching 1 metadata files... done. >Inspecting system... done. >Fetching files from 7.1-RELEASE for merging... done. >Preparing to download files... done. >Fetching 16008 patches.. done. >Applying patches... done. >Fetching 36199 files... failed. >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 06:02:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E8F21065673 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 06:02:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from email1.allantgroup.com (email1.emsphone.com [199.67.51.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D98728FC26 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 06:02:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by email1.allantgroup.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id o9262guW035711 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 01:02:43 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o9262gET059874 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 01:02:42 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o9262foc059522; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 01:02:41 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 01:02:41 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Paul B Mahol Message-ID: <20101002060241.GF40148@dan.emsphone.com> References: <1285967910.14091.81.camel@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-OS: FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96 at email1.allantgroup.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (email1.allantgroup.com [199.67.51.78]); Sat, 02 Oct 2010 01:02:43 -0500 (CDT) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.45 Cc: Chetan Shukla , Devin Teske , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: How to check version of Make in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 06:02:45 -0000 In the last episode (Oct 01), Paul B Mahol said: > On 10/1/10, Devin Teske wrote: > > On 10/1/10, Chetan Shukla wrote: > >> > I need to check the version of Make installed in FreeBSD. make -v > >> > does not help here. > >> > What is the similar command in FreeBSD ? > >> > >> On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 18:33 +0000, Paul B Mahol wrote: > >> gmake. On serious side there is no way to find version and freebsd make > >> havent changed much in years... > > > > On the command-line... > > > > strings `which make` | grep -B1 MAKE_VERSION > > > > Or in a makefile... > > > > /usr/tmp/Makefile: > > all: > > @echo "MAKE_VERSION='$(MAKE_VERSION)'" > > > > make > > MAKE_VERSION='5200408120' > > Nice. Even nicer: make -V MAKE_VERSION Not that the version really helps; there have been many additions to make since 2004. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 06:15:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2844B106566C for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 06:15:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chetan.shukla@aricent.com) Received: from jaguar.aricent.com (jaguar.aricent.com [180.151.2.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53AAA8FC0C for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 06:15:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jaguar.aricent.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postfix.imss71 (Postfix) with ESMTP id 778CA36B29; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 11:43:23 +0530 (IST) Received: from GUREXHT01.ASIAN.AD.ARICENT.COM (gurexht01.asian.ad.aricent.com [10.203.171.136]) by jaguar.aricent.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 607BB36B26; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 11:43:23 +0530 (IST) Received: from GUREXMB01.asian.ad.aricent.com ([10.203.171.130]) by GUREXHT01.ASIAN.AD.ARICENT.COM ([10.203.171.137]) with mapi; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 11:44:47 +0530 From: Chetan Shukla To: Dan Nelson , Paul B Mahol Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 11:44:47 +0530 Thread-Topic: How to check version of Make in FreeBSD Thread-Index: Acth+A/8MnPylVFEQSSeqTVmAWfHxwAALBsg Message-ID: References: <1285967910.14091.81.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20101002060241.GF40148@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20101002060241.GF40148@dan.emsphone.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Devin Teske , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: RE: How to check version of Make in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 06:15:12 -0000 Thanks everyone for the guidance. I got the VERSION number as 5200408120 Does it mean it has make-3.81? Also could someone provide guidance on How to run code(C C++) written for Linux/Solaris On FreeBSD machine without changing Makefiles? Thanks & Regards, Chetan -----Original Message----- From: Dan Nelson [mailto:dnelson@allantgroup.com] Sent: Saturday, October 02, 2010 11:33 AM To: Paul B Mahol Cc: Devin Teske; Chetan Shukla; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to check version of Make in FreeBSD In the last episode (Oct 01), Paul B Mahol said: > On 10/1/10, Devin Teske wrote: > > On 10/1/10, Chetan Shukla wrote: > >> > I need to check the version of Make installed in FreeBSD. make -v > >> > does not help here. > >> > What is the similar command in FreeBSD ? > >> > >> On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 18:33 +0000, Paul B Mahol wrote: > >> gmake. On serious side there is no way to find version and freebsd mak= e > >> havent changed much in years... > > > > On the command-line... > > > > strings `which make` | grep -B1 MAKE_VERSION > > > > Or in a makefile... > > > > /usr/tmp/Makefile: > > all: > > @echo "MAKE_VERSION=3D'$(MAKE_VERSION)'" > > > > make > > MAKE_VERSION=3D'5200408120' > > Nice. Even nicer: make -V MAKE_VERSION Not that the version really helps; there have been many additions to make since 2004. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com "DISCLAIMER: This message is proprietary to Aricent and is intended solely = for the use of the individual to whom it is addressed. It may contain privi= leged or confidential information and should not be circulated or used for = any purpose other than for what it is intended. If you have received this m= essage in error, please notify the originator immediately. If you are not t= he intended recipient, you are notified that you are strictly prohibited fr= om using, copying, altering, or disclosing the contents of this message. Ar= icent accepts no responsibility for loss or damage arising from the use of = the information transmitted by this email including damage from virus." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 06:26:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 991771065670 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 06:26:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from email1.allantgroup.com (email1.emsphone.com [199.67.51.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C6128FC15 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 06:26:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by email1.allantgroup.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id o926Q8tf037761 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 01:26:08 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o926Q7o8015691 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 01:26:08 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o926Q7id015690; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 01:26:07 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 01:26:07 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Chetan Shukla Message-ID: <20101002062607.GG40148@dan.emsphone.com> References: <1285967910.14091.81.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20101002060241.GF40148@dan.emsphone.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-OS: FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96 at email1.allantgroup.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (email1.allantgroup.com [199.67.51.78]); Sat, 02 Oct 2010 01:26:08 -0500 (CDT) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.45 Cc: Paul B Mahol , Devin Teske , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: How to check version of Make in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 06:26:09 -0000 In the last episode (Oct 02), Chetan Shukla said: > Thanks everyone for the guidance. I got the VERSION number as 5200408120 > Does it mean it has make-3.81? No, it means it has make version 5200408120. make-3.81 is GNU make, while FreeBSD uses BSD make. They are mostly compatible, but there are differences (mainly concerning how you include other makefiles, variable expansion, and looping within a makefile). If you need GNU make, you can install it from the ports tree, and it will be called "gmake". > Also could someone provide guidance on How to run code(C C++) written for > Linux/Solaris On FreeBSD machine without changing Makefiles? If it compiles on Solaris it should compile on FreeBSD, since Solaris doesn't use GNU make either. If you're trying to run some open source software, changes are it's already in the ports tee. If not, you can post your problems here and hopefully someone will help. http://www.freebsd.org/ports/ -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 08:09:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 605C01065670 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 08:09:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B02138FC0A for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 08:09:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o92899qE001952 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 09:09:09 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk o92899qE001952 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1286006949; bh=9y9LJ1ooEhM9+m2v4851bl3I1x6Z4ou4q1M03sTie0w=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4CA6E89E.5040008@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20S at,=2002=20Oct=202010=2009:09:02=20+0100|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|Organization:=20Infracaninophi le|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0=20(Macintosh=3B=20U=3B=20Intel=20Mac= 20OS=20X=2010.6=3B=20en-GB=3B=20rv:1.9.2.9)=20Gecko/20100915=20Thu nderbird/3.1.4|MIME-Version:=201.0|To:=20freebsd-questions@freebsd .org|Subject:=20Re:=20Updating=20bzip2=20to=20remove=20potential=2 0security=20vulnerability|References:=20<20101001121332.5b04fa61@s corpio>=09<20101001171420.GE40148@dan.emsphone.com>=20<20101001165 940.5d0e73f5@scorpio>|In-Reply-To:=20<20101001165940.5d0e73f5@scor pio>|X-Enigmail-Version:=201.1.1|OpenPGP:=20id=3D60AE908C|Content- Type:=20multipart/signed=3B=20micalg=3Dpgp-sha1=3B=0D=0A=20protoco l=3D"application/pgp-signature"=3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3D"----------- -enig7CB5696791FF9C0D3E943BA7"; b=VvOUEAueabhRKfSAlRfbIjLqsy6tz+ZXIQR1OxvkLOwKwigyxX3W26lGDk8DYa24D RBPA6FO5wEDCM98YwGXtkFgV5tUjva4VamGaFHcAv2bQ9jY2CJfHzoSt3NbIrO40De 0NN0TRFanYL0S40Wbo+ue2dbQX6Q3h6tmvd2NbT4= Message-ID: <4CA6E89E.5040008@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 09:09:02 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101001121332.5b04fa61@scorpio> <20101001171420.GE40148@dan.emsphone.com> <20101001165940.5d0e73f5@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20101001165940.5d0e73f5@scorpio> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig7CB5696791FF9C0D3E943BA7" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.3 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: Updating bzip2 to remove potential security vulnerability X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 08:09:14 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig7CB5696791FF9C0D3E943BA7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 01/10/2010 21:59:40, Jerry wrote: > On Fri, 1 Oct 2010 12:14:20 -0500 > Dan Nelson articulated: >=20 >> You must have missed=20 >> http://security.freebsd.org/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-10:08.bzip2.asc ; >> patches for 6, 7, and 8 are available there, and freebsd-update has >> fixed binaries if you use that. >=20 > Never saw it. So I am assuming that simply using something like: >=20 > csup -L2 -h cvsup.FreeBSD.org "/usr/src/share/examples/cvsup/standard-s= upfile" >=20 > Then rebuild Kernel & World is not going to work. Is that correct? Not correct. csup(1) /after/ the date that fixes are published will obtain sources that contain the fixes on all affected and supported branches, including 8-STABLE and 9-CURRENT which aren't covered by freebsd-update(8). This will be documented in the security advisory, where they list the revision numbers (both SVN and CVS) at which the fixes were applied. You don't need to /both/ apply patches and use csup -- csup already contains the result of applying the patches. Patches are an alternative to csup, but the intended audience there is typically people running either heavily customized variants of the OS or installations with severely limited bandwidth or restricted internet connectivity. The majority of users should be using the standard update mechanisms -- csup or freebsd-update. Obviously, you will have to compile[*] and install the fixed software. Going through a full buildworld cycle will certainly do that, but in most cases you can achieve the required result by rebuilding and reinstalling significantly smaller chunks of the system. Again, procedures to do this should be described in the security advisory, together with any other requirements (eg. that you would have to reboot your system where there are significant changes to the kernel, or even to ubiquitous bits like libc.so.) Cheers, Matthew [*] Unless you're using freebsd-update, of course. --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig7CB5696791FF9C0D3E943BA7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEUEARECAAYFAkym6KUACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxccgCbBaqY2UJnfyjn7chN0LAraDMH XE8Al280ylubGTNtmK/MCCxEAUFej0g= =UM8g -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig7CB5696791FF9C0D3E943BA7-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 08:35:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC3FB106566C for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 08:35:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kuku@kukulies.org) Received: from werkwelt.de (post.werkwelt.de [91.194.85.74]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BBDF8FC0C for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 08:35:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [193.158.169.206] (account kuku@kukulies.org HELO [192.168.2.102]) by werkwelt.de (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.0.13) with ESMTPSA id 7071434 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 10:35:26 +0200 Message-ID: <4CA6EECD.2000400@kukulies.org> Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 10:35:25 +0200 From: Christoph Kukulies User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; de; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4CA5DC68.6040507@kukulies.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: 5.25" floppy drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 08:35:29 -0000 Thanks to all. Solved. It was a multiple cause issue: 1st: BIOS Setting was incorrect (had to enable 1.2MB 5.25 rather than 3.5 which was it set to - an oversight in the firts place, that occured to me). 2nd: Cable issue: I had a combined cable (3.5 " connector at the end and edge connector second but last. 3rd: in combination with 2nd: DS0 jumper issue. Anyway, I found a cable that had two edge connectors. In the end it turns out that the floppies that were lying in a drawer for 19 years, are producing read errors. I also learnt about fdcontrol. Floppy interface has changed significantly since Joerg Wunsch and Bruce Evans worked on them in the early FreeBSD days back in 1995 :) -- Christoph Am 01.10.2010 19:18, schrieb Warren Block: > On Fri, 1 Oct 2010, Christoph Kukulies wrote: > >> I'm in the need of reading some data from old 5.25" floppy media >> (1.2MB). >> I lent 2 drives from neighbour institutes at the university and after >> having recalled that the >> floppies have to be enabled in the BIOS I'm now seeing the fd0 device >> in dmesg (FreeBSD 8.0 RELEASE). >> >> I can do a dd if=/dev/fd0 of=/root/fd0.dmp >> >> The select light is lit, the head motor seems to get power but the >> spindle doesn't spin. > > Possibly a drive select issue. Some drives had jumpers or switches, > some cables have flipped-around wires so the connectors are specific > to one drive or another. If your cabling is straight-through with no > funny business at the connectors, set the drive to DS0. If the cable > has split out and flipped-over sections, DS1 should be set in the > jumpers --but then it depends on which connector is used. ...I think, > anyway, it's been a few years since I've had to use a 5.25. > >> I tried that with two TEAC drives to no avail. >> >> Any clues what I may have forgotten? The drive is connected with the >> edge connector and the end is open. >> Does it need to be terminated? > > None that I've seen. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 09:23:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3665A106566B for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 09:23:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB0408FC15 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 09:23:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk8 with SMTP id 8so393686qyk.13 for ; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 02:23:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ZvukPZ8G+JzBVFeSDM3y4bL4oE9oBbpFTCSq8dsLPxA=; b=jZmnut4r8Q49nr8yOCsydlL219iZZR5A6AUffzIFBGyk1ihiOTPovb/E7yqrMNOtXr HCNMo4rBW4tc60rylQgSZ5Pj994uDIceyBOvVB8B7OCnfxrwCxYqjU41PYvZOPxlIl4m IDPVb+7WhHd/Zv3PcSwFX03PHqzj4Bnua6bZI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=mV/S4GVljlLFvq00q6Pt5QUBG2BR1+ZQ2OuxRotZ7r06CJKWI+cXWrHJzVgwdGxlWy 7ccRYZ2gWjKfEgw3zFN2qBt78yqQoUJ59RGlCjXOQVOJgLAD3CI+R3KHeRObv+IkomWP L0llA4X1cRJuNcfZwy7Db2M+ZLDxoj+ZeUABE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.75.211 with SMTP id z19mr4682833qaj.185.1286011420205; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 02:23:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.215.209 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 02:23:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4CA6419C.3050109@cyberleo.net> References: <4CA61FE5.9050306@teksavvy.com> <4CA6419C.3050109@cyberleo.net> Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 10:23:40 +0100 Message-ID: From: krad To: CyberLeo Kitsana Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Matthew , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND: could not configure root hints from 'named.root': file not found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 09:23:42 -0000 On 1 October 2010 21:16, CyberLeo Kitsana wrote: > On 10/01/2010 12:52 PM, Matthew wrote: > > I would be grateful for any pointers on how to resolve this. I suspect > > the error message may not be exactly descriptive of whats happening. > > Kinda. > > Here's a few points to keep in mind when working with bind in FreeBSD: > > * By default, named runs in a chroot jail rooted at /var/named/. > > * For security reasons, named cannot write to anything in that tree, > except the dynamic, slave, and working directories. > > * named uses its current working directory to resolve relative pathnames > in the configuration file. > > * With a recent change to ISC Bind 9, named started complaining if it > couldn't write to its current working directory. At the time, this was > (chroot)/etc/namedb/; this was subsequently changed to > (chroot)/etc/namedb/working/ to make named happy without compromising > security. > > When the working directory for named was (chroot)/etc/namedb/, > everything was peachy. Since this was changed, relative pathnames no > longer work as expected because the reference point is different. The > easiest solution is to alter your configuration file to include only > absolute pathnames, relative to the root of the jail. > > The default named config file (in /var/named/etc/namedb/named.conf) is > an excellent source of examples for this. > > -- > Fuzzy love, > -CyberLeo > Technical Administrator > CyberLeo.Net Webhosting > http://www.CyberLeo.Net > > > Furry Peace! - http://wwww.fur.com/peace/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Hmm, options { directory "."; that doesnt look ideal. Not sure if you are meaning to do that but put an explicit direcorty in eg /etc/namedb. Otherwise it will be looking in whatever current directory you are in at that time. The main named.conf will be found as its supplied via a cli switch by the rc script. However all subsequent files will come from the current dir From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 09:30:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55DC4106564A for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 09:30:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amsibamsi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB17F8FC14 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 09:30:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyx24 with SMTP id 24so1780634eyx.13 for ; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 02:30:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Kml7e4QiyU3KkQEuXDpMG0+h32THrfKl1SvSMbT0JMA=; b=t/9BV/J0vIIBQqgtNnIc75Ldoo/eUyOzFy8+2BQ8IZgRLoT+wl1CakVGNK/OIn2z5X zBuKwZKK2Hm+tb2ncWGh/uGMXO2TY+YkJBTmCVSASi0vFeUCud6AkmnPCM9cKeJjI4Ix fVb+yHSkfDJgr/qhQi1M9K+mykzS++ihbxPoA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=CEaMf3vwsW5YvhHPNLiNDfvQzEw4XflaOZ1BGY0kQPL0zbkTIHsMxBbU7ki+2WIphw DwchhGQk/Oy0vFST2Ax+g4hixjMyuabpcaBpARp17xXrcT2zRvBOSFgQ2ZtldCYfYcm/ 36J/gNfZACQ9QIHe3w07nyGp0cyFwZJqKdwDs= Received: by 10.213.108.73 with SMTP id e9mr6475443ebp.36.1286011845883; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 02:30:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hulk.l.ttyv0.net (80-219-18-72.dclient.hispeed.ch [80.219.18.72]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u9sm3343199eeh.23.2010.10.02.02.30.44 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 02 Oct 2010 02:30:44 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CA6FBC2.8080908@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 11:30:42 +0200 From: Anselm Strauss User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100723 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Swap on ZFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 09:30:47 -0000 Hi I have a virtual server with only 512 MB of memory but still want to run ZFS on it. When there is IO load and only few memory left it occasionally happens that the server freezes, network ping will still work. As far as I know there was the problem that an IO request on ZFS first needs to allocate some memory before it can be run. So in the case where no memory is left and some swap must be used which lies also on ZFS, it would still first need some free memory for the request. This basically results in a deadlock and the system freezes. Would this not happen every time when the system is out of memory and swap must be used? So it basically makes swap on ZFS useless. Has there been any fix or workaround for this? I guess it does not help when I use a swap file on ZFS instead of a separate zvol. Appreciating any ideas Anselm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 10:10:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80BC51065673 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 10:10:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6727@bellsouth.net) Received: from fmailhost01.isp.att.net (fmailhost01.isp.att.net [207.115.11.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EFEE8FC1C for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 10:10:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mueller6722.bellsouth.net (adsl-18-80-159.sdf.bellsouth.net[68.18.80.159]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc01) with SMTP id <20101002101044H0100dmvhce>; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 10:10:44 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [68.18.80.159] Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 10:27:00 +0000 From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <4ca708f4.svuMWmkOCHSjxBDf%mueller6727@bellsouth.net> User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Massive portupgrade without being interrupted by configuration screens? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 10:10:45 -0000 How can one do a massive portupgrade, as with -r or -R, without being interrupted by options configuration screens for many individual ports? Idea is to let it run unattended such as when I might run it starting just before bedtime. Doing "make config" ahead of time also gives the chance to recover from a typo at the configuration screen (high risk). Best thing I can think of is, using multimedia/ffmpeg as an example, is doing a dry run portupgrade -Rn multimedia/ffmpeg |& tee -a wouldbe.log This would show what other packages would need to be portupgraded and avoid reconfiguring up-to-date dependencies. Then I would go to each of those directories in the ports tree and run "make config". Running "make config-recursive" in /usr/ports/multimedia/ffmpeg would produce configuration screens for all dependencies, including those that are up-to-date. I tried portupgrade -RCn multimedia/ffmpeg |& tee -a wouldbe.log but then I got all dependency configuration screens, including those that were up-to-date, and also the interface didn't work right: I got garbage when trying to respond; it didn't write to the configuration screen but produced non-color garbage to the background. Running "make config-recursive" in /usr/ports/multimedia/ffmpeg would configure all dependencies, including those that are up-to-date and therefore not in need of portupgrading, though "make config-recursive" seems appropriate for a first build/install of a port. But I think there is no perfect way to be sure of doing all "make config"s in advance, since selectable options could require additional dependencies. If you try to portupgrade perl to 5.12 and everything that depends on it, as advised in UPDATING file, date 20100715, you will likely get a lot of configuration dialog screens: I speak from experience, would surely like a way to do all these "make config"s at the beginning. Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 10:25:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B57B5106564A for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 10:25:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FD5F8FC0A for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 10:25:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk8 with SMTP id 8so438175qyk.13 for ; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 03:25:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=dA3QWuxDVpCCKnfgujU8My+WSOtNic+LaB4+SfJV0/Q=; b=utPjhZpN6fBGdZQvFh2xPsNpC4xLVct0w9H3pIbIA6I+r7ccxksgNGKCw2fwx6Blku ilV5LuQzw7isj+2RrefK8co0rXxnM0HaV4TM8/rtUsL/7Ru++GJNquTenUopWMGDI4xZ 4Z6GsDtr+maMG9w6Zz0T3v1zfmK+98m4vP03o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=VWIhd7X7tbOmNEFtZmYuhajW9noCZ4eDBD549UXrhV4YlozDFEupUkzXpipx4TzuLN lPF4bMP+xOcBfkDznCmNh3Z7M35sztNvorMoHgzbaod5m+Dwyl7L15r+xRvY4KIcqhS5 BvcWKxYToZ/v1sOLQmxF6deevKospQ1D4EToo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.80.194 with SMTP id u2mr4884060qck.49.1286015111695; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 03:25:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.215.209 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 03:25:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4ca708f4.svuMWmkOCHSjxBDf%mueller6727@bellsouth.net> References: <4ca708f4.svuMWmkOCHSjxBDf%mueller6727@bellsouth.net> Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 11:25:11 +0100 Message-ID: From: krad To: Thomas Mueller Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Massive portupgrade without being interrupted by configuration screens? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 10:25:12 -0000 On 2 October 2010 11:27, Thomas Mueller wrote: > How can one do a massive portupgrade, as with -r or -R, without being > interrupted by options configuration screens for many individual ports? > Idea is to let it run unattended such as when I might run it starting just > before bedtime. Doing "make config" ahead of time also gives the chance to > recover from a typo at the configuration screen (high risk). > > Best thing I can think of is, using multimedia/ffmpeg as an example, is > doing a dry run > > portupgrade -Rn multimedia/ffmpeg |& tee -a wouldbe.log > > This would show what other packages would need to be portupgraded and avoid > reconfiguring up-to-date dependencies. Then I would go to each of those > directories in the ports tree and run "make config". > > Running "make config-recursive" in /usr/ports/multimedia/ffmpeg would > produce configuration screens for all dependencies, including those that are > up-to-date. > > I tried > > portupgrade -RCn multimedia/ffmpeg |& tee -a wouldbe.log > > but then I got all dependency configuration screens, including those that > were up-to-date, and also the interface didn't work right: I got garbage > when trying to respond; it didn't write to the configuration screen but > produced non-color garbage to the background. > > Running "make config-recursive" in /usr/ports/multimedia/ffmpeg would > configure all dependencies, including those that are up-to-date and > therefore not in need of portupgrading, though "make config-recursive" seems > appropriate for a first build/install of a port. > > But I think there is no perfect way to be sure of doing all "make config"s > in advance, since selectable options could require additional dependencies. > > If you try to portupgrade perl to 5.12 and everything that depends on it, > as advised in UPDATING file, date 20100715, you will likely get a lot of > configuration dialog screens: I speak from experience, would surely like a > way to do all these "make config"s at the beginning. > > Tom > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > have a look at portmaster. It gets all the config bits out of the way at the start then starts the builds From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 08:04:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 065FF106564A for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 08:04:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bernard@lecuire.fr) Received: from neutron.lecuire.fr (lecuire.fr [82.232.211.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 867A38FC08 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 08:04:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [192.168.0.50]) by neutron.lecuire.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23CCA61C34 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 09:48:13 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4CA6E3C4.5070208@lecuire.fr> Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 09:48:20 +0200 From: Bernard Lecuire User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; fr; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4C8316C5.2060906@gmail.com> <4C9F7589.5090707@lecuire.fr> <4CA6C448.90602@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4CA6C448.90602@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 101001-1, 01/10/2010), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 10:31:11 +0000 Subject: Re: FreeBSD on Compaq mini CQ10 anyone? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bernard@lecuire.fr List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 08:04:41 -0000 Le 02/10/2010 07:34, Gonzalo Nemmi a écrit : > El 26/09/2010 01:32 p.m., BernardL escribió: >> Le 05/09/2010 06:04, Gonzalo Nemmi a écrit : >>> I just got one and was wondering if anyone was running FreeBSD on it >>> and how well does it work out of the box. >>> All comments are welcome. >>> >> I have one with FreeBSD 8.1. Some difficulties to install X11 (I had to >> use Driver "vesa" instead of "intel" in the section "Device" of >> xorg.config). And the internal Wifi device is not recognized by FreeBSD. >> Regards >> Bernard Lecuire > > Hi there Bernard and thanks for your comment! > > Can you tell me if suspend to ram (acpiconf -s3) works on the mini > CQ10-120?, although I presume it doesn´t work that well, or at all, if > you had to use "vesa" instead of the "intel" driver ... I would expect > that would cause the screen not to come back after suspend and ACPI is > my main concern in my netbook. > > Are you loading the i915 driver in your /boot/loader.conf? > > Thanks a lot and my best regards > Gonzalo Nemmi Hi Gonzalo, As you expect, the screen doesn't come back. I didn't make any change to /boot/loader.conf. Have a good day Bernard Lecuire From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 10:33:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2946106566B for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 10:33:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6727@bellsouth.net) Received: from fmailhost04.isp.att.net (fmailhost04.isp.att.net [207.115.11.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0EB18FC17 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 10:33:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mueller6722.bellsouth.net (adsl-210-172-77.sdf.bellsouth.net[68.210.172.77]) by isp.att.net (frfwmhc04) with SMTP id <20101002103349H0400oblate>; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 10:33:49 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [68.210.172.77] Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 10:50:00 +0000 From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <4ca70e58.85Hn9/T3OsqNTwqg%mueller6727@bellsouth.net> User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Christoph Kukulies Subject: Re: 5.25" floppy drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 10:33:50 -0000 from "Christoph Kukulies" : > Thanks to all. > Solved. > It was a multiple cause issue: > 1st: BIOS Setting was incorrect (had to enable 1.2MB 5.25 rather than 3.5 which was it set to - an oversight in the firts place, that occured to me). > 2nd: Cable issue: I had a combined cable (3.5 " connector at the end and edge connector second but last. > 3rd: in combination with 2nd: DS0 jumper issue. > Anyway, I found a cable that had two edge connectors. > In the end it turns out that the floppies that were lying in a drawer for 19 years, are producing read errors. > I also learnt about fdcontrol. Floppy interface has changed significantly since Joerg Wunsch and Bruce Evans > worked on them in the early FreeBSD days back in 1995 :) > -- > Christoph Congratulations on solving your floppy problem, but I can understand your problems with floppies. They've gone bad with age for me too. I can read but not write, then I can't read and in most cases can't even reformat. FreeBSD installation sets structure (base.aa, base.ab, base.ac etc.) suggests that one could install from a big set of floppies, but there's no way I could get such a good set of floppies together. I think my 5.25" floppies and drive hold out better than the 3.5" floppies and drives. Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 10:51:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C47106567A for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 10:51:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eliaschr@cha.forthnet.gr) Received: from mx-out.forthnet.gr (mx-out.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.107]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D9848FC15 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 10:51:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx-av-03.forthnet.gr (mx-av.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.27]) by mx-out-03.forthnet.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o92AdSvK030535 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 13:39:28 +0300 Received: from MX-IN-01.forthnet.gr (mx-in-01.forthnet.gr [193.92.150.23]) by mx-av-03.forthnet.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o92AdSlU001111 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 13:39:28 +0300 Received: from pluto.universe (188.4.97.35.dsl.dyn.forthnet.gr [188.4.97.35]) by MX-IN-01.forthnet.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o92AdRCo018298 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 13:39:28 +0300 Authentication-Results: MX-IN-01.forthnet.gr smtp.mail=eliaschr@cha.forthnet.gr; spf=neutral Authentication-Results: MX-IN-01.forthnet.gr header.from=eliaschr@cha.forthnet.gr; sender-id=neutral From: Elias Chrysocheris To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 13:39:25 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.1-RELEASE; KDE/4.5.1; amd64; ; ) References: <4ca708f4.svuMWmkOCHSjxBDf%mueller6727@bellsouth.net> In-Reply-To: <4ca708f4.svuMWmkOCHSjxBDf%mueller6727@bellsouth.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201010021339.26533.eliaschr@cha.forthnet.gr> Subject: Re: Massive portupgrade without being interrupted by configuration screens? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 10:51:08 -0000 On Saturday 02 of October 2010 13:27:00 Thomas Mueller wrote: > How can one do a massive portupgrade, as with -r or -R, without being > interrupted by options configuration screens for many individual ports? > Idea is to let it run unattended such as when I might run it starting just > before bedtime. Doing "make config" ahead of time also gives the chance > to recover from a typo at the configuration screen (high risk). > > Best thing I can think of is, using multimedia/ffmpeg as an example, is > doing a dry run > > portupgrade -Rn multimedia/ffmpeg |& tee -a wouldbe.log > > This would show what other packages would need to be portupgraded and avoid > reconfiguring up-to-date dependencies. Then I would go to each of those > directories in the ports tree and run "make config". > > Running "make config-recursive" in /usr/ports/multimedia/ffmpeg would > produce configuration screens for all dependencies, including those that > are up-to-date. > > I tried > > portupgrade -RCn multimedia/ffmpeg |& tee -a wouldbe.log > > but then I got all dependency configuration screens, including those that > were up-to-date, and also the interface didn't work right: I got garbage > when trying to respond; it didn't write to the configuration screen but > produced non-color garbage to the background. > > Running "make config-recursive" in /usr/ports/multimedia/ffmpeg would > configure all dependencies, including those that are up-to-date and > therefore not in need of portupgrading, though "make config-recursive" > seems appropriate for a first build/install of a port. > > But I think there is no perfect way to be sure of doing all "make config"s > in advance, since selectable options could require additional > dependencies. > > If you try to portupgrade perl to 5.12 and everything that depends on it, > as advised in UPDATING file, date 20100715, you will likely get a lot of > configuration dialog screens: I speak from experience, would surely like a > way to do all these "make config"s at the beginning. > > Tom > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" If you are sure that the default configuration settings are OK for you, then one way is to perform a portupgrade with the switches --batch --yes, like portupgrade --batch --yes -a This will assume that the default settings are those you like and will not ask you anything about configuration screens e.t.c. Elias From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 11:21:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3D69106566C for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 11:21:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gw0-f54.google.com (mail-gw0-f54.google.com [74.125.83.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A573E8FC12 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 11:21:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gwb15 with SMTP id 15so1747964gwb.13 for ; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 04:21:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.101.106.10 with SMTP id i10mr2097805anm.154.1286018467592; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 04:21:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-071-077-039-064.nc.res.rr.com [71.77.39.64]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k11sm3981271ani.30.2010.10.02.04.21.06 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 02 Oct 2010 04:21:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: FreeBSD.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 67C31E54835 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 07:21:05 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 07:21:04 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20101002072104.30a6b10e@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <4ca70e58.85Hn9/T3OsqNTwqg%mueller6727@bellsouth.net> References: <4ca70e58.85Hn9/T3OsqNTwqg%mueller6727@bellsouth.net> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: 5.25" floppy drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 11:21:09 -0000 On Sat, 02 Oct 2010 10:50:00 +0000 Thomas Mueller articulated: > from "Christoph Kukulies" : > > > Thanks to all. > > > Solved. > > > It was a multiple cause issue: > > > 1st: BIOS Setting was incorrect (had to enable 1.2MB 5.25 rather > > than 3.5 which was it set to - an oversight in the firts place, > > that occured to me). > > > > 2nd: Cable issue: I had a combined cable (3.5 " connector at the > > end and edge connector second but last. > > > > 3rd: in combination with 2nd: DS0 jumper issue. > > > > Anyway, I found a cable that had two edge connectors. > > > In the end it turns out that the floppies that were lying in a > > drawer for 19 years, are producing read errors. I also learnt about > > fdcontrol. Floppy interface has changed significantly since Joerg > > Wunsch and Bruce Evans worked on them in the early FreeBSD days > > back in 1995 :) > > > > -- > > Christoph > > Congratulations on solving your floppy problem, but I can understand > your problems with floppies. They've gone bad with age for me too. > I can read but not write, then I can't read and in most cases can't > even reformat. > > FreeBSD installation sets structure (base.aa, base.ab, base.ac etc.) > suggests that one could install from a big set of floppies, but > there's no way I could get such a good set of floppies together. I > think my 5.25" floppies and drive hold out better than the 3.5" > floppies and drives. I had a similar problem last year on a Windows platform when a local municipality asked to move the data from nearly 500 5.25 disks to CD. The disks were in storage since mid 1990. I located an external 5.25 disk drive, they are dirt cheap, and attempted to copy the data. Like you pointed out, the majority of the disks were severely damaged. I finally settled on Spin-Rite to repair the disks. I had used it before and was familiar with its workings. It took nearly a week for us to get the disks repaired and copied; however, with only a couple of exceptions, the job ended successfully. I cannot comment on 3.5 vs 5.25 disks, except to say "good riddance" to both formats. -- Jerry ✌ FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 11:56:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE277106566C for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 11:56:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from b.smeelen@ose.nl) Received: from mail.ose.nl (mail.ose.nl [212.178.134.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 472678FC14 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 11:56:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.ose.nl for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 13:56:46 +0200 From: "Bas Smeelen" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4CA48649.8090605@ose.nl> Message-ID: <20101002115646.12b2e032@mail.ose.nl> Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 13:56:46 +0200 X-User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US) AppleWebKit/534.3 (KHTML, like Gecko) Ubuntu/10.04 Chromium/6.0.472.53 Chrome/6.0.472.53 Safari/534.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Cache Memory in top command X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 11:56:50 -0000 =5F=5F=5F=5F=5F =20 From=3A Bas Smeelen =5Bmailto=3Ab=2Esmeelen=40ose=2Enl=5D To=3A freebsd-questions=40freebsd=2Eorg Sent=3A Thu=2C 30 Sep 2010 14=3A44=3A57 +0200 Subject=3A Re=3A Cache Memory in top command On 09/30/2010 01=3A37 PM=2C RW wrote=3A =3E On Thu=2C 30 Sep 2010 09=3A24=3A58 +0200 =3E Bas Smeelen =3Cb=2Esmeelen=40ose=2Enl=3E wrote=3A =3E =3E =3E =20 =3E=3E *Wired=3A* number of pages wired down=2C including cached file dat= a pages =3E=3E =20 =3E That refers to buffer pages =28displayed as Buf=29=2C which are a sub= set of =3E the cached file data pages=2E =3E =3E The pages in the cache queue are not specifically cached file data =3E pages=2C they are clean pages from any source=2C including pages that= have =3E been written to swap=2E Thanks=2E I got this completely wrong=2C though I have read the FAQ a few= years ago=2E http=3A//www=2Efreebsd=2Eorg/doc/en=5FUS=2EISO8859-1/books/faq/misc=2Ehtml= =23TOP-FREEMEM The values shown by top=281=29 labeled as Inact=2C Cache=2C and Buf are all= cached data at different aging levels=2E =20 DISCLAIMER=3A This e-mail is for the intended recipient=28s=29 only=2E Acce= ss=2C disclosure=2C copying=2C distribution or reliance on any of it by anyone else is prohibited=2E If yo= u have received it by mistake please let us know by reply and then delete it from your system= =2E From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 12:15:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAB921065673 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 12:15:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A5858FC15 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 12:15:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from park.js.berklix.net (p549A59BC.dip.t-dialin.net [84.154.89.188]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id o92CFLF7032540; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 12:15:23 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by park.js.berklix.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id o92CFDp1096066; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 14:15:14 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o92CF3Op011886; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 14:15:08 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201010021215.o92CF3Op011886@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Christoph Kukulies From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://www.berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://www.berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Sat, 02 Oct 2010 10:35:25 +0200." <4CA6EECD.2000400@kukulies.org> Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 14:15:03 +0200 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.25" floppy drive X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 12:15:26 -0000 Hi Christoph, > In the end it turns out that the floppies that were lying in a drawer > for 19 years, are producing read errors. Do NOT throw them out. I have a tool that can rescue near all data. http://berklix.com/~jhs/src/bsd/jhs/bin/public/valid/ Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey: BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Mail plain text; Not HTML, quoted-printable & base 64 spam formats. Avoid top posting, It cripples itemised cumulative responses. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 12:44:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3E73106564A; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 12:44:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amsibamsi@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2689E8FC14; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 12:44:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy22 with SMTP id 22so1801976ewy.13 for ; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 05:44:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=le/EKRmQwKzEyuAt6QAhcElAnW48qkVjXxfPmIlyt1M=; b=l07Qc1vuqXt6PopAx+VqjL+wlQNKo2iNHwj5x1MPmY7Co1BaYVeHbyv/1Ssd51e0uu Gdx5rN0QxjMgaMGYBM30ZX5IZEdo1gTLDSf3QSHKDWH1MURWCfrMTYTgq/7TTovEWJfY /3knwohDel9hFwMRL7S6IDU2EncopnUyGr3rE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=lDcPB7KGtDKOIOWMWBNqWXFSuyBPz5k1OZeK0qWNLjNwEiocCUfAKeFwBQbUbbEUPP WZM9/nkwVuDc5Y1e9atdVkk4o/aBrgYuFSVEgCD3Kp21oeHWIt1cLUWxerIfAYXM+eG9 nxNdsIOu0MlAPXuNf/Hv39pA/qkop8HMRvgy8= Received: by 10.213.105.134 with SMTP id t6mr4350800ebo.1.1286023449948; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 05:44:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hulk.l.ttyv0.net (80-219-18-72.dclient.hispeed.ch [80.219.18.72]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a48sm3589361eei.0.2010.10.02.05.44.08 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 02 Oct 2010 05:44:09 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4CA72917.8060209@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 14:44:07 +0200 From: Anselm Strauss User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.11) Gecko/20100723 Thunderbird/3.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Hans Petter Selasky References: <4CA3B8F5.80904@gmail.com> <4CA4E0C3.1050707@gmail.com> <201009302138.51616.hselasky@c2i.net> In-Reply-To: <201009302138.51616.hselasky@c2i.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USB disk on CS5536 unstable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 12:44:11 -0000 On 09/30/10 21:38, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > On Thursday 30 September 2010 21:10:59 Anselm Strauss wrote: >> Maybe sending it to just the USB list was too specific ... >> >> On 09/30/10 00:08, Anselm Strauss wrote: >>> Hi >>> >>> I have an ALIX board that has an AMD Geode and the CS5536 companion chip >>> with integrated USB on it. When I connect a USB disk I have observed >>> various problems. For example when I run fsck_ufs on a 250 GB partition >>> the process gets stuck in biord state and fsck reports unreadable >>> sectors. When I do a dd over the whole disk and direct it to /dev/null >>> it suddenly returns with no error, but having read only a small fraction >>> of the disk. I tried it with two different disks and two different ALIX >>> boards. I'm pretty sure the disks are okay since I tried them on other >>> hardware. >>> >>> As far as I know there was some trouble with the chip regarding >>> timeouts. Under load after some time the USB just stops responding. I >>> have tried 8.0 and 8.1. Is there any known problem? How can I track this >>> down? >>> >>> Anselm > > If you compile the kernel with USB_DEBUG, then there are some sysctls under > hw.usb.ehci which you can tweak. Needs to be set before boot. > > --HPS Did not know that there were configurable bug workarounds in sysctl. When I set hw.usb.ehci.lostintrbug=1 in /boot/loader.conf the problems seem gone. Without this setting I got the following kernel message when dd did abort: ehci_timeout: xfer=0xc29cd3c8 Thanks, Anselm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 13:51:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A7EB1065670 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 13:51:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from email1.allantgroup.com (email1.emsphone.com [199.67.51.115]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 051948FC18 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 13:51:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by email1.allantgroup.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id o92DprjM087390 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 08:51:53 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o92Dpq4G058879 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 08:51:52 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id o92DpqOK058878; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 08:51:52 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from dan) Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 08:51:52 -0500 From: Dan Nelson To: Thomas Mueller Message-ID: <20101002135151.GH40148@dan.emsphone.com> References: <4ca708f4.svuMWmkOCHSjxBDf%mueller6727@bellsouth.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4ca708f4.svuMWmkOCHSjxBDf%mueller6727@bellsouth.net> X-OS: FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96 at email1.allantgroup.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (email1.allantgroup.com [199.67.51.78]); Sat, 02 Oct 2010 08:51:53 -0500 (CDT) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.45 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Massive portupgrade without being interrupted by configuration screens? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 13:51:56 -0000 In the last episode (Oct 02), Thomas Mueller said: > How can one do a massive portupgrade, as with -r or -R, without being > interrupted by options configuration screens for many individual ports? > Idea is to let it run unattended such as when I might run it starting just > before bedtime. Doing "make config" ahead of time also gives the chance > to recover from a typo at the configuration screen (high risk). > > Best thing I can think of is, using multimedia/ffmpeg as an example, is > doing a dry run > > portupgrade -Rn multimedia/ffmpeg |& tee -a wouldbe.log > > This would show what other packages would need to be portupgraded and > avoid reconfiguring up-to-date dependencies. Then I would go to each of > those directories in the ports tree and run "make config". > > Running "make config-recursive" in /usr/ports/multimedia/ffmpeg would > produce configuration screens for all dependencies, including those that > are up-to-date. config-recursive does a "config-conditional" for each dependency. It should only up a config dialog for an installed up-to-date port if the port maintainer has added OPTIONS lines without bumping the portversion. That should be a rare occurance. > I tried > > portupgrade -RCn multimedia/ffmpeg |& tee -a wouldbe.log The -c flag is what you really wanted, I think. -C reconfigures every port, while -c calls "make config-conditional". > but then I got all dependency configuration screens, including those that > were up-to-date, and also the interface didn't work right: I got garbage > when trying to respond; it didn't write to the configuration screen but > produced non-color garbage to the background. Probably because you tee'd the output, so all the child processes see is a pipe on stdout (and apps usually only try to do color and cursor positioning on ttys). With -n you're not building anything anyway, so there's really no need to log the output. Just run it without the tee, then run your regular portupgrade later with tee. Instead of using tee, I use /usr/bin/script, which gives child processes a real tty to interact with, so full-screen apps work correctly. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 14:38:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87DF21065694; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 14:38:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hselasky@c2i.net) Received: from swip.net (mailfe03.swip.net [212.247.154.65]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D78C58FC16; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 14:37:59 +0000 (UTC) X-Cloudmark-Score: 0.000000 [] X-Cloudmark-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=iBCGAMPDYtSF9sDXX85uHY3wcnYctfVT8vFpe3qPflY= c=1 sm=1 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=M8b_wTzEtboA:10 a=MnI1ikcADjEx7bvsp0jZvQ==:17 a=QEZAVPXKQj2yEnUJ_F8A:9 a=5cxkDjqMIe2V7__GYdIA:7 a=zvbPjBMEg3KgyQa_pC4C_hKo-GQA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=MnI1ikcADjEx7bvsp0jZvQ==:117 Received: from [188.126.201.140] (account mc467741@c2i.net HELO laptop002.hselasky.homeunix.org) by mailfe03.swip.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.2.19) with ESMTPA id 29607635; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 16:37:57 +0200 From: Hans Petter Selasky To: Anselm Strauss Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 16:39:11 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.1-STABLE; KDE/4.4.5; amd64; ; ) References: <4CA3B8F5.80904@gmail.com> <201009302138.51616.hselasky@c2i.net> <4CA72917.8060209@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <4CA72917.8060209@gmail.com> X-Face: +~\`s("[*|O,="7?X@L.elg*F"OA\I/3%^p8g?ab%RN'(; _IjlA: hGE..Ew, XAQ*o#\/M~SC=S1-f9{EzRfT'|Hhll5Q]ha5Bt-s|oTlKMusi:1e[wJl}kd}GR Z0adGx-x_0zGbZj'e(Y[(UNle~)8CQWXW@:DX+9)_YlB[tIccCPN$7/L' MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201010021639.11568.hselasky@c2i.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-usb@freebsd.org Subject: Re: USB disk on CS5536 unstable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 14:38:00 -0000 On Saturday 02 October 2010 14:44:07 Anselm Strauss wrote: > On 09/30/10 21:38, Hans Petter Selasky wrote: > > On Thursday 30 September 2010 21:10:59 Anselm Strauss wrote: > >> Maybe sending it to just the USB list was too specific ... > >> > >> On 09/30/10 00:08, Anselm Strauss wrote: > >>> Hi > >>> > >>> I have an ALIX board that has an AMD Geode and the CS5536 companion > >>> chip with integrated USB on it. When I connect a USB disk I have > >>> observed various problems. For example when I run fsck_ufs on a 250 GB > >>> partition the process gets stuck in biord state and fsck reports > >>> unreadable sectors. When I do a dd over the whole disk and direct it > >>> to /dev/null it suddenly returns with no error, but having read only a > >>> small fraction of the disk. I tried it with two different disks and > >>> two different ALIX boards. I'm pretty sure the disks are okay since I > >>> tried them on other hardware. > >>> > >>> As far as I know there was some trouble with the chip regarding > >>> timeouts. Under load after some time the USB just stops responding. I > >>> have tried 8.0 and 8.1. Is there any known problem? How can I track > >>> this down? > >>> > >>> Anselm > > > > If you compile the kernel with USB_DEBUG, then there are some sysctls > > under hw.usb.ehci which you can tweak. Needs to be set before boot. > > > > --HPS > > Did not know that there were configurable bug workarounds in sysctl. > When I set hw.usb.ehci.lostintrbug=1 in /boot/loader.conf the problems > seem gone. > > Without this setting I got the following kernel message when dd did abort: > > ehci_timeout: xfer=0xc29cd3c8 > > > Thanks, > Anselm Maybe you can report the PCI vendor ID and product so that we can add this quirk. --HPS From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 14:42:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16945106566C for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 14:42:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2D628FC08 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 14:42:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn10 with SMTP id 10so55541iwn.13 for ; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 07:42:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.157.205 with SMTP id c13mr7309600ibx.71.1286030563187; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 07:42:43 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.166.77 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 07:42:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Eitan Adler Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 10:42:23 -0400 Message-ID: To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: ACPI & battery issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 14:42:46 -0000 I see ACPI Exception: AE_NO_HARDWARE_RESPONSE, Returned by Handler for [EmbeddedControl] (20100331/evregion-588) ACPI Error (psparse-0633): Method parse/execution failed [\\_SB_.PCI0.LPCB.BAT1._BST] (Node 0xc6adba60), AE_NO_HARDWARE_RESPONSE repeatedly in dmesg sysctl's relating to battery information is also slow: % time sysctl hw.acpi.battery.state hw.acpi.battery.state: 7 sysctl hw.acpi.battery.state 0.00s user 2.18s system 72% cpu 3.006 total % time sysctl hw.acpi.battery hw.acpi.battery.life: -1 hw.acpi.battery.time: -1 hw.acpi.battery.state: 7 hw.acpi.battery.units: 1 hw.acpi.battery.info_expire: 5 sysctl hw.acpi.battery 0.00s user 6.58s system 67% cpu 9.779 total also note that the life and time are both negative one. This is on a Lenovo G530 laptop. -- Eitan Adler From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 14:49:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D6A2106564A for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 14:49:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamesbrandongooch@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com (mail-ww0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C691D8FC1B for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 14:49:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so16678wwi.1 for ; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 07:49:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=g9XVMLCDUBi74zfGzkILetN6yeZrZYms3d7FPktGTPk=; b=MxRzqtJP/E0baSLujj9qlypH0ZUe40BhEm5SD374UfJPv8GwT12vYK1irocOMcYObM Vr9N5ejVetD48fynWcxNB8Tbl0hw7ZNl7+t6Gaxn/ylAfoU9b481Mt5yAYkktLABWPkx Ektia0nPaUadCg6RGlkNK7Go6Ym1fKroCXUJM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=BSard1lIiOImBolaP/+NTOJ9RXf2EfsLfdoRDN9dc0KwcSXNhvhV3Lz67YjScMyGS8 XgOOaFCB4xFQwC6CjnSPs1j+xRz5fxZL66Dul+Pex2GJLh4F0ANP6y5vKoDKcIsE9md4 AOrgrEzi1eK5A0HdHqi8RCLgYPcvmhOnbHZP0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.50.18 with SMTP id y18mr3269296web.113.1286030989869; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 07:49:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.133.133 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 07:49:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4ca708f4.svuMWmkOCHSjxBDf%mueller6727@bellsouth.net> References: <4ca708f4.svuMWmkOCHSjxBDf%mueller6727@bellsouth.net> Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 09:49:49 -0500 Message-ID: From: Brandon Gooch To: Thomas Mueller Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Massive portupgrade without being interrupted by configuration screens? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 14:49:51 -0000 On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Thomas Mueller wrote: > How can one do a massive portupgrade, as with -r or -R, without being int= errupted by options configuration screens for many individual ports? =A0Ide= a is to let it run unattended such as when I might run it starting just bef= ore bedtime. =A0Doing "make config" ahead of time also gives the chance to = recover from a typo at the configuration screen (high risk). > > Best thing I can think of is, using multimedia/ffmpeg as an example, is d= oing a dry run > > portupgrade -Rn multimedia/ffmpeg |& tee -a wouldbe.log > > This would show what other packages would need to be portupgraded and avo= id reconfiguring up-to-date dependencies. =A0Then I would go to each of tho= se directories in the ports tree and run "make config". > > Running "make config-recursive" in /usr/ports/multimedia/ffmpeg would pro= duce configuration screens for all dependencies, including those that are u= p-to-date. > > I tried > > portupgrade -RCn multimedia/ffmpeg |& tee -a wouldbe.log > > but then I got all dependency configuration screens, including those that= were up-to-date, and also the interface didn't work right: I got garbage w= hen trying to respond; it didn't write to the configuration screen but prod= uced non-color garbage to the background. > > Running "make config-recursive" in /usr/ports/multimedia/ffmpeg would con= figure all dependencies, including those that are up-to-date and therefore = not in need of portupgrading, though "make config-recursive" seems appropri= ate for a first build/install of a port. > > But I think there is no perfect way to be sure of doing all "make config"= s in advance, since selectable options could require additional dependencie= s. > > If you try to portupgrade perl to 5.12 and everything that depends on it,= as advised in UPDATING file, date 20100715, you will likely get a lot of c= onfiguration dialog screens: I speak from experience, would surely like a w= ay to do all these "make config"s at the beginning. > > Tom Well, I'm not using portupgrade, but instead ports-mgmt/portmaster: # portmaster --force-config --no-confirm [...] lang/perl5.12 Gets all of the config menus out of the way (--force-config), and doesn't sit waiting for confirmation to proceed with install (--no-confirm). I do this only the first time I build a port, or if I need to change a config option and reinstall. Works for me! -Brandon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 15:03:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A17711065670 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 15:03:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (unknown [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61FEA8FC13 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 15:03:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id B06CDE6326; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 16:03:52 +0100 (BST) Received: from unknown (client-82-31-11-222.midd.adsl.virginmedia.com [82.31.11.222]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 16:03:52 +0100 (BST) Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 16:03:50 +0100 From: Bruce Cran To: Brandon Gooch Message-ID: <20101002160350.000039b1@unknown> In-Reply-To: References: <4ca708f4.svuMWmkOCHSjxBDf%mueller6727@bellsouth.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.16.6; i586-pc-mingw32msvc) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Thomas Mueller , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Massive portupgrade without being interrupted by configuration screens? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 15:03:53 -0000 On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 09:49:49 -0500 Brandon Gooch wrote: > Well, I'm not using portupgrade, but instead ports-mgmt/portmaster: +1 -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 15:23:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 289681065673 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 15:23:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from doug@polands.org) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3FA08FC15 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 15:23:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([10.128.143.53]) by hrndva-qmta04.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id <20101002150634596.NDCZ23474@hrndva-qmta04.mail.rr.com> for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 15:06:34 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=iGF3DqghDyT/uy4mV2LvOKNXCATMSjL+tOl9cucoGVk= c=1 sm=0 a=-RD9cPh-pCEA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=02fl1sNAWVw4WL3Wmu4WJA==:17 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=pedpZTtsAAAA:8 a=frN8QhiJ00E-zmN5R1MA:9 a=4WbihE8ZyA2l_luAAZgqiiAdlrUA:4 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=MSl-tDqOz04A:10 a=eJojReuL3h0A:10 a=02fl1sNAWVw4WL3Wmu4WJA==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 75.87.219.217 Received: from [75.87.219.217] ([75.87.219.217:61440] helo=haran.polands.org) by hrndva-oedge03.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id AC/8D-27923-C3A47AC4; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 15:05:33 +0000 Received: from [172.16.1.15] (iPhoneD.polands.org [172.16.1.15]) by haran.polands.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o92F5Lt8060377; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 10:05:21 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from doug@polands.org) References: <4ca708f4.svuMWmkOCHSjxBDf%mueller6727@bellsouth.net> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8B117) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <90CBD45F-CB00-4656-A5BB-836FE6401B8A@polands.org> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8B117) From: Doug Poland Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 10:05:33 -0500 To: Brandon Gooch Cc: Thomas Mueller , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Massive portupgrade without being interrupted by configuration screens? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 15:23:30 -0000 On Oct 2, 2010, at 9:49, Brandon Gooch wrote: > On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Thomas Mueller > wrote: >> How can one do a massive portupgrade, as with -r or -R, without being int= errupted by options configuration screens for many individual ports? Idea i= s to let it run unattended such as when I might run it starting just before b= edtime. Doing "make config" ahead of time also gives the chance to recover f= rom a typo at the configuration screen (high risk). >>=20 >> Best thing I can think of is, using multimedia/ffmpeg as an example, is d= oing a dry run >>=20 >> portupgrade -Rn multimedia/ffmpeg |& tee -a wouldbe.log >>=20 >> This would show what other packages would need to be portupgraded and avo= id reconfiguring up-to-date dependencies. Then I would go to each of those d= irectories in the ports tree and run "make config". >>=20 >> Running "make config-recursive" in /usr/ports/multimedia/ffmpeg would pro= duce configuration screens for all dependencies, including those that are up= -to-date. >>=20 >> I tried >>=20 >> portupgrade -RCn multimedia/ffmpeg |& tee -a wouldbe.log >>=20 >> but then I got all dependency configuration screens, including those that= were up-to-date, and also the interface didn't work right: I got garbage wh= en trying to respond; it didn't write to the configuration screen but produc= ed non-color garbage to the background. >>=20 >> Running "make config-recursive" in /usr/ports/multimedia/ffmpeg would con= figure all dependencies, including those that are up-to-date and therefore n= ot in need of portupgrading, though "make config-recursive" seems appropriat= e for a first build/install of a port. >>=20 >> But I think there is no perfect way to be sure of doing all "make config"= s in advance, since selectable options could require additional dependencies= . >>=20 >> If you try to portupgrade perl to 5.12 and everything that depends on it,= as advised in UPDATING file, date 20100715, you will likely get a lot of co= nfiguration dialog screens: I speak from experience, would surely like a way= to do all these "make config"s at the beginning. >>=20 >> Tom >=20 > Well, I'm not using portupgrade, but instead ports-mgmt/portmaster: >=20 > # portmaster --force-config --no-confirm [...] lang/perl5.12 >=20 > Gets all of the config menus out of the way (--force-config), and > doesn't sit waiting for confirmation to proceed with install > (--no-confirm). I do this only the first time I build a port, or if I > need to change a config option and reinstall. >=20 > Works for me! >=20 > -Brandon If I understand the OPs question correctly, I believe setting the environmen= t variable BATCH=3Dyes will give desired results with portupgrade. This wil= l cause port compile defaults to be used in lieu of an existing /var/db/port= s/*/options file.=20= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 15:52:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CEF1106566B for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 15:52:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C24E78FC12 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 15:52:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm9 with SMTP id 9so3343331fxm.13 for ; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 08:52:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=4VrEfMK2T93XTEAOq46AAtSDi40/ipnccN92GmipyVw=; b=xPWQHX9C0Bmh5QRtj1yCmK5TYPeWOBiupuqT7UKNhKnLgF8tvjN8Do89qFrxxuWTP9 HmYZCo4e+2Pbs86FQeok7nqVe6QRarJemEQAA77qZeyuQZdBPqQf6PbioIbBgT3V992n xUnisA6czjF0BltmtEUbS+ngQafJo1DnCHfME= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=X9oPPMHebD0rYbDt+Rg6flr9/qFovfjzHg8VMhL+DZOBFy3tZcB1SH4nulHWtnPkwc FTJt08NCPlnKK8IEH565ZVK+oFK4KqwkxWOeR7awOJwYsZWC3n39a/0lPrVfjTT6PGNn be+ELPsRsbP0fQnPJg0XUIbNPRPBnO95G0904= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.125.70 with SMTP id x6mr6739126far.85.1286034741830; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 08:52:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.120.139 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 08:52:21 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4CA6FBC2.8080908@gmail.com> References: <4CA6FBC2.8080908@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 10:52:21 -0500 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Anselm Strauss Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Swap on ZFS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 15:52:23 -0000 On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 4:30 AM, Anselm Strauss wrote: > Hi > > I have a virtual server with only 512 MB of memory but still want to run > ZFS on it. > > Has there been any fix or workaround for this? I guess it does not help > when I use a swap file on ZFS instead of a separate zvol. > Make sure you are following this: http://wiki.freebsd.org/RootOnZFS/GPTZFSBoot Please note swap is not a ZVOL, it is a sepate partition. You'd have the same problem with ZVOL. Also use i386, that will save you a bit of memory. Follow the ZFS tuning guide. Even if you follow all those things, I'm not sure you'll be able to get it stable. 512MB is really tight. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 15:55:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60AE4106566B for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 15:55:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gx0-f182.google.com (mail-gx0-f182.google.com [209.85.161.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 104448FC1B for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 15:55:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk8 with SMTP id 8so1800509gxk.13 for ; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 08:55:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.236.102.143 with SMTP id d15mr5447285yhg.26.1286034944358; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 08:55:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-071-077-039-064.nc.res.rr.com [71.77.39.64]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m4sm1026551vcg.0.2010.10.02.08.55.43 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 02 Oct 2010 08:55:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: FreeBSD.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 41C27E54828 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 11:55:42 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 11:55:41 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20101002115541.0e8996e4@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <90CBD45F-CB00-4656-A5BB-836FE6401B8A@polands.org> References: <4ca708f4.svuMWmkOCHSjxBDf%mueller6727@bellsouth.net> <90CBD45F-CB00-4656-A5BB-836FE6401B8A@polands.org> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Massive portupgrade without being interrupted by configuration screens? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 15:55:45 -0000 On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 10:05:33 -0500 Doug Poland articulated: > If I understand the OPs question correctly, I believe setting the > environment variable BATCH=yes will give desired results with > portupgrade. This will cause port compile defaults to be used in > lieu of an existing /var/db/ports/*/options file. I was of the opinion, and I could be wrong, that setting 'BATCH=yes' simply stopped the build process from attempting to create an options file; however, it would use an existing one if it was present. Perhaps someone with more intimate knowledge of this would care to comment. I say this because I have used the BATCH technique once I had all of my ports configured the way I wanted. Subsequent updates always appeared to use any existing configuration files. -- Jerry ✌ FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ I can't mate in captivity. Gloria Steinem, on why she has never married From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 16:02:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F832106564A for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 16:02:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E0B08FC12 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 16:02:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm9 with SMTP id 9so3346816fxm.13 for ; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 09:02:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=TLs1UQlsFLEXgl0lNRYnh/7qA4XAcEVumOZfRnw3R9I=; b=rmoUhRAv+RDZVpGVUmDwuwCoHYjr+gUrd3Aw4SeTH3j4llUN0UUeOF3jxuTNVmXwr2 HiO5hacSb0jjDKnpAjZ1+PeeXEjYolunherT1b4h0NrtrlTVwVk2ysaFPEwCS+KkVkfh +hWDPbsP11NxFCk/YsAY9FDNSUNmsnyLW67mM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=K13SfEgZKuesLr7bKwslzl2tTU1CTD8kIgnmiPaShRT+fJQ8OiPhKObzMbsT2JM1TY qHrHJgGeTBCe3Wp1SZlqSyudiVPVplSXHs48zWIYtFY/OLK7g6FhJpxrroKwFwNC3T8Y w7NawKppdwDEaGofEki3ii6sg3YOuxrwLOgtE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.40.196 with SMTP id l4mr7037545fae.20.1286035349828; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 09:02:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.120.139 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 09:02:29 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4ca708f4.svuMWmkOCHSjxBDf%mueller6727@bellsouth.net> Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 11:02:29 -0500 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Brandon Gooch Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Thomas Mueller , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Massive portupgrade without being interrupted by configuration screens? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 16:02:31 -0000 On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 9:49 AM, Brandon Gooch wrote: > On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 5:27 AM, Thomas Mueller > wrote: > > Well, I'm not using portupgrade, but instead ports-mgmt/portmaster: > > # portmaster --force-config --no-confirm [...] lang/perl5.12 > > Gets all of the config menus out of the way (--force-config), and > doesn't sit waiting for confirmation to proceed with install > (--no-confirm). I do this only the first time I build a port, or if I > need to change a config option and reinstall. > On portmaster version 3, just use -G. No more options menus. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 17:14:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B794106564A for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 17:14:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E59A38FC08 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 17:14:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24837 invoked from network); 2 Oct 2010 17:14:07 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 2 Oct 2010 17:14:07 -0000 Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.6]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7391550835 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 13:13:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 603F21CC20; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 13:13:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: FreeBSD References: <4ca708f4.svuMWmkOCHSjxBDf%mueller6727@bellsouth.net> <90CBD45F-CB00-4656-A5BB-836FE6401B8A@polands.org> <20101002115541.0e8996e4@scorpio> Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 13:13:55 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20101002115541.0e8996e4@scorpio> (Jerry's message of "Sat, 2 Oct 2010 11:55:41 -0400") Message-ID: <44wrq0plf0.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Massive portupgrade without being interrupted by configuration screens? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 17:14:08 -0000 Jerry writes: > On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 10:05:33 -0500 > Doug Poland articulated: > >> If I understand the OPs question correctly, I believe setting the >> environment variable BATCH=yes will give desired results with >> portupgrade. This will cause port compile defaults to be used in >> lieu of an existing /var/db/ports/*/options file. > > I was of the opinion, and I could be wrong, that setting 'BATCH=yes' > simply stopped the build process from attempting to create an options > file; however, it would use an existing one if it was present. Perhaps > someone with more intimate knowledge of this would care to comment. I > say this because I have used the BATCH technique once I had all of my > ports configured the way I wanted. Subsequent updates always appeared to > use any existing configuration files. In two minutes of looking at bsd.port.mk, I confirmed that this is correct. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 17:21:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 418251065672 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 17:21:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFC418FC12 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 17:21:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz15 with SMTP id 15so3762789bwz.13 for ; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 10:21:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Blg3k3dEGTpTWDnb/dSf/i0Q1r4osoEDCDeTGOmF4lo=; b=o+ENy00YJ0BJWmzDKw4Qz/4RPSZMvSdX9shEOA4W9gZbrX/oel2rbchtltl19fLgoU pyupU0hVNCqwuI392cSpwn4HUVKOV1nKMOP0SAZJb7M0LSTRB4b8Oa/cQbQJtL+3zXsu RL/9vqFsPIGpBNK+shoxy+WqZfwpilNwQ7VpE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=gPPMz85O8eBTo4W4Bgf5D+hbbTypqudHXKJ8IshM4RQTMUXTCLeEtp0XeNPXzSi8BA DI86NT7/9/IxmZZHpzUUEzSWVqijxV0bsswWWNKbID4K+T8Sc9KJuaLaM4gbYG5fL5Mk ejUM0zAads2W0d3dBevG4bkJ7FWnkiKRH85V4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.57.9 with SMTP id a9mr5257458bkh.104.1286040070340; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 10:21:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.81.138 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 10:21:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20101002115541.0e8996e4@scorpio> References: <4ca708f4.svuMWmkOCHSjxBDf%mueller6727@bellsouth.net> <90CBD45F-CB00-4656-A5BB-836FE6401B8A@polands.org> <20101002115541.0e8996e4@scorpio> Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 12:21:10 -0500 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Massive portupgrade without being interrupted by configuration screens? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 17:21:12 -0000 On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 10:55 AM, Jerry wrote: > I was of the opinion, and I could be wrong, that setting 'BATCH=yes' > simply stopped the build process from attempting to create an options > file; however, it would use an existing one if it was present. Perhaps > someone with more intimate knowledge of this would care to comment. I > say this because I have used the BATCH technique once I had all of my > ports configured the way I wanted. Subsequent updates always appeared to > use any existing configuration files. > That approach doesn't really make a lot of sense if non-fault options aren't suitable for you. Once you set the port options, the options screen doesn't appear anyway(BATCH=no) unless options have changed. With your usage, a port with non-standard options could be changed, and your build wouldn't be what you expect it to be. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 18:26:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E134106564A for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 18:26:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sonicy@otenet.gr) Received: from rosebud.otenet.gr (rosebud.otenet.gr [83.235.67.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E98DD8FC1D for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 18:26:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pulstar.local (ppp-94-69-61-126.home.otenet.gr [94.69.61.126]) by rosebud.otenet.gr (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id o92IQQfS012284 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 21:26:26 +0300 Message-ID: <4CA77952.1080704@otenet.gr> Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 21:26:26 +0300 From: Manolis Kiagias User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-7 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: ANNOUNCE: Custom 64bit FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p1 with XFCE packages released X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 18:26:29 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hey all, I have just completed an 8.1-RELEASE-p1 based build of the 'Custom releases' project hosted here: http://freebsd-custom.wikidot.com At the moment only the 64bit version is available, while a 32bit version is in the works and is expected later on this week. You may download the ISO file immediately using the downloads page: http://freebsd-custom.wikidot.com/downloads-page This release is based on the latest XFCE desktop and includes a wide variety of desktop-related packages, like OpenOffice, abiword, gnumeric, firefox35, gimp, inkscape, evince and so on. The base system is 8.1-RELEASE. A few other small window managers are included like windowmaker and fluxbox. Note this release does not include editors/zim and x11-wm/icewm due to build problems. Make sure to read the README file before installation. Also note that installing linux related packages during initial setup needs a few more steps. This is due to differences in sysinstall between 7.X and 8.X releases. A detailed explanation is provided in the README file. As always, please report any problems, success stories, comments and criticisms to manolis@FreeBSD.org -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkyneVIACgkQZ/MxGm4PtJRLyACeJ9xaFnMqmbWG1Bqg215/UZJG t3YAniiuU+JXFARW7Z94TOaA1Ujqbi6p =bs0M -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 18:36:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DD24106564A for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 18:36:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from traveling08@cox.net) Received: from fed1rmmtao101.cox.net (fed1rmmtao101.cox.net [68.230.241.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 286AE8FC12 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 18:36:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fed1rmimpo03.cox.net ([70.169.32.75]) by fed1rmmtao101.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.00.01.00 201-2244-105-20090324) with ESMTP id <20101002183645.VMFA4042.fed1rmmtao101.cox.net@fed1rmimpo03.cox.net> for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 14:36:45 -0400 Received: from asus64 ([72.220.91.10]) by fed1rmimpo03.cox.net with bizsmtp id Ducl1f00L0DQbeo04uclM4; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 14:36:45 -0400 X-VR-Score: -20.00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=bpc8uEicDnqxZSslY2USwZnb9rPJRdwMtO2+C0QOm0U= c=1 sm=1 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=/nTdwXoUaSOHzX6NQnbKNQ==:17 a=szUVclnwL_haDAishg8A:9 a=lWCXbh2hBpcFkfrqKGwA:7 a=9wmRJhDQnlU2ozbR-hNzf9K-WwwA:4 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=/nTdwXoUaSOHzX6NQnbKNQ==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 11:36:40 -0700 From: Robert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101002113640.2ab36871@asus64> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: OT: fdisk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 18:36:46 -0000 Greetings I am in deep with the wife. Her computer went belly up. It was running XP pro and I had backups going to a second drive. I can no longer access that drive. I pulled it and attached it via USB to one of my FreeBSD machines but it will not mount. It is a 500G hard drive and I get _wild_ results just looking at it with fdisk. ~> fdisk /dev/da1s1 ******* Working on device /dev/da1s1 ******* parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are: cylinders=60801 heads=255 sectors/track=63 (16065 blks/cyl) Figures below won't work with BIOS for partitions not in cyl 1 parameters to be used for BIOS calculations are: cylinders=60801 heads=255 sectors/track=63 (16065 blks/cyl) Media sector size is 512 Warning: BIOS sector numbering starts with sector 1 Information from DOS bootblock is: The data for partition 1 is: sysid 114 (0x72),(unknown) start 218129509, size 1701990410 (831050 Meg), flag 63 beg: cyl 368/ head 111/ sector 45; end: cyl 371/ head 101/ sector 51 The data for partition 2 is: sysid 116 (0x74),(unknown) start 729050177, size 543974724 (265612 Meg), flag 73 beg: cyl 67/ head 115/ sector 32; end: cyl 299/ head 114/ sector 44 The data for partition 3 is: sysid 101 (0x65),(Novell Netware/386 3.xx) start 168653938, size 0 (0 Meg), flag 74 beg: cyl 114/ head 111/ sector 32; end: cyl 353/ head 115/ sector 52 The data for partition 4 is: sysid 0 (0000),(unused) start 2692939776, size 51635 (25 Meg), flag 0 beg: cyl 0/ head 0/ sector 0; end: cyl 0/ head 0/ sector 0 I tried to use "dd" and copy data to another spare drive. It appears to work but then I can no longer mount that drive. Other than taking it to a data recovery shop does anyone have any idea. I haven't told her that her data is lost yet. I may have to wait until we are drinking a bottle of wine. :-) Thanks for any suggestions. Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 18:43:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93346106566B for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 18:43:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patfbsd@davenulle.org) Received: from smtp.lamaiziere.net (net.lamaiziere.net [91.121.44.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A3F48FC12 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 18:43:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from baby-jane.lamaiziere.net (unknown [192.168.1.10]) by smtp.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B79B263316B; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 20:42:59 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by baby-jane.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96DCD2CFA1A; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 20:45:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 20:45:25 +0200 From: Patrick Lamaiziere To: Kevin Kobb Message-ID: <20101002204525.30d4bda8@davenulle.org> In-Reply-To: <4CA5D2FE.8070900@skylinecorp.com> References: <20101001001926.6ef8aa93@davenulle.org> <4CA5D2FE.8070900@skylinecorp.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: router / firewall with PF and carp. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 18:43:01 -0000 Le Fri, 01 Oct 2010 08:24:30 -0400, Kevin Kobb a écrit : > Both would probably be fine. However, I would recommend taking a look > at pfsense if I were you. It is made to do what you want without as > much of the overhead as a full blown *BSD install. > > It is easier to configure, update, the documentation is good, and you > can get top notch paid support from the developers if you want. Pfsense was our first choice but it does not handle IPv6 yet. http://doc.pfsense.org/index.php/Is_there_IPv6_support_available Thanks to all for yours replies, regards. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 19:00:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A79A106564A for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 19:00:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patfbsd@davenulle.org) Received: from smtp.lamaiziere.net (net.lamaiziere.net [91.121.44.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 392038FC0C for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 19:00:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from baby-jane.lamaiziere.net (unknown [192.168.1.10]) by smtp.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3828963316B; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 21:00:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by baby-jane.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E1C42CFA1A; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 21:02:36 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 21:02:32 +0200 From: Patrick Lamaiziere To: Robert Message-ID: <20101002210232.36d379e4@davenulle.org> In-Reply-To: <20101002113640.2ab36871@asus64> References: <20101002113640.2ab36871@asus64> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OT: fdisk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 19:00:08 -0000 Le Sat, 2 Oct 2010 11:36:40 -0700, Robert a écrit : > I tried to use "dd" and copy data to another spare drive. It appears > to work but then I can no longer mount that drive. Other than taking > it to a data recovery shop does anyone have any idea. May be "photorec" will help (in systutils/testdisk). http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/PhotoRec Good luck! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 19:08:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 054611065675 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 19:08:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC1958FC19 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 19:08:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gyg4 with SMTP id 4so1835364gyg.13 for ; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 12:08:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.100.14.5 with SMTP id 5mr2768760ann.78.1286046494984; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 12:08:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-071-077-039-064.nc.res.rr.com [71.77.39.64]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l7sm4739166ane.39.2010.10.02.12.08.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 02 Oct 2010 12:08:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: FreeBSD.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C9DDBE54828 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 15:08:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 15:08:12 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20101002150812.1c3250ff@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20101002113640.2ab36871@asus64> References: <20101002113640.2ab36871@asus64> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAG1BMVEX3/uPVnZf2/v9ejGkqHB74++H///+cHCT3m6cgqYvfAAACbElEQVQ4jWXTQW/bIBQAYJLJuRMn8TVCss9zTdrrXJ6bHe1Ej/bossF9EpJ3nbapf3sP8JxOQ4qV8OU9HvjBROWcYNlKHtxlQ1/huBaOBiMwQtgHhbokMLIT76Acps5hvy61+6WsjkCZzNEW0+fcQ7Nl5uoPCegjjjhN5/MEABd89k9hXkQoX6cwPIDKCt8tYG5wpmdrxAyuolTPqpiVoEpVCWvl6e00RAD4JBJQnO4lvv0O4Cnd3WUGevYNFohxFYAy7jCCtW39LaQK8BgDAgiHVinVJlCiFKlcqgEHfwb1EuG+DwFGMO3oCIuJIEYoa8KJECBB+UBldgm0MQmEGz7GQr8XYRPKzYNO1zZ8mgdAu4BG5Ke/4KFboM8458UScViAAvYD93OAsu+Bc3zxCU7ZAjT74+dQv9K7oO0d1wuscop48Pc50O5bcVwgGzh/mXzaizJuAWERh8k3eaxKmxu4kV1p2XOEg3i3c8M+EKR93P0D1KATpC55vMHaGqFf5f/AwhlrhHgg8DTezopt6I3o3Qx4q4q6YaPxK8RxcClXeFGhTTS++QR6TS/oBs7l4WhzuNMubZG6hIBkF4qqZVdWczIqSrjKVF/i4o26IP2oElBGFy5CXKSnf6UWDTC6zKSqoAvzsakjjBvdzLKnmxdhY8eRsX7VSCUBdgD1hVJpx6y2OOS1DNDILYmqdWUJ+oHvd0rRvAqX5kpxQMR6yxHzPV6VlPFyWE7LKc36keNQI64gLP8Ybgtmg+zYuBl4fuI8VqW2RqDGE8Uzu7GxGa803whDdxx3bSZbRhfQUSxvmnpLZWpRFqHz7v8AvsBe0S1zv9UAAAAASUVORK5CYII= Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: OT: fdisk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 19:08:16 -0000 On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 11:36:40 -0700 Robert articulated: > I am in deep with the wife. Her computer went belly up. It was running > XP pro and I had backups going to a second drive. I can no longer > access that drive. If the disk is the problem, I would suggest getting a copy of Spin-Rite and running it at level 6 . It is the best disk recovery program I have come across. -- Jerry ✌ FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ History books which contain no lies are extremely dull. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 19:14:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DC74106566C for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 19:14:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from svein-listmail@stillbilde.net) Received: from mail.stillbilde.net (unknown [IPv6:2002:51af:3dc3:0:250:56ff:feb7:c]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 857CD8FC14 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 19:14:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (w500.skogen.stillbilde.net [192.168.4.11]) (Authenticated sender: svein-listmail) by mail.stillbilde.net (Familien Skogens mail) with ESMTPSA id F339723 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 21:14:52 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4CA784A2.6000903@stillbilde.net> Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 21:14:42 +0200 From: "Svein Skogen (Listmail account)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101002113640.2ab36871@asus64> <20101002150812.1c3250ff@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20101002150812.1c3250ff@scorpio> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigE9FACE2BB4ADB6ABD1C46AE7" Subject: Re: OT: fdisk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 19:14:48 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigE9FACE2BB4ADB6ABD1C46AE7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 02.10.2010 21:08, Jerry wrote: > On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 11:36:40 -0700 > Robert articulated: >=20 >> I am in deep with the wife. Her computer went belly up. It was running= >> XP pro and I had backups going to a second drive. I can no longer >> access that drive. >=20 > If the disk is the problem, I would suggest getting a copy of Spin-Rite= > and running it at level 6 . > It is the best disk recovery program I have come across. +1 to that. I've been using spinrite for more than a decade, and have lost count of the times it has saved data for me (or rather: For people dumping their crashed pc in my lap, since _I_ have _BACKUPS_). When you're done recovering data, you might want to take a look at your backup strategy. Select a new one that doesn't depend on spinning metal just as fragile as the one you're backing up from. //Svein --=20 --------+-------------------+------------------------------- /"\ |Svein Skogen | svein@d80.iso100.no \ / |Solberg =C3=98stli 9 | PGP Key: 0xE5E76831 X |2020 Skedsmokorset | svein@jernhuset.no / \ |Norway | PGP Key: 0xCE96CE13 | | svein@stillbilde.net ascii | | PGP Key: 0x58CD33B6 ribbon |System Admin | svein-listmail@stillbilde.net Campaign|stillbilde.net | PGP Key: 0x22D494A4 +-------------------+------------------------------- |msn messenger: | Mobile Phone: +47 907 03 575 |svein@jernhuset.no | RIPE handle: SS16503-RIPE --------+-------------------+------------------------------- If you really are in a hurry, mail me at svein-mobile@stillbilde.net This mailbox goes directly to my cellphone and is checked even when I'm not in front of my computer. ------------------------------------------------------------ Picture Gallery: https://gallery.stillbilde.net/v/svein/ ------------------------------------------------------------ --------------enigE9FACE2BB4ADB6ABD1C46AE7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkynhKYACgkQODUnwSLUlKRBVwCgn1FwzlnH5FEwYhmmZnB2d0H1 pG8AnRvER0WOk+8mxjOpE8sEAfBb4YOF =6yDw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigE9FACE2BB4ADB6ABD1C46AE7-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 20:02:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FE40106566C for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 20:02:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from four.harrisons@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B77D68FC18 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 20:02:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm9 with SMTP id 9so3423481fxm.13 for ; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 13:02:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:subject:from:to :date:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=l/VV26ECQW81uPXQcW48WGUotwQ7c9Fx4FoTnfQ2T7A=; b=m36jGbnX5AGqd64F5R6CWdFX+yszWL/mE4l9wfsa1sRAnnLf7gm6zBSDB5Pggqij9T vlKMcSrgFI8xRcTQgaL3rUbiglksjkpF54HuqKMvk3IZSHY4ZRrq39TQ3dqxRQ+vfw1w pSUP4Pij3jCpI97YPgOGXEFfl16XJPkVdCi5I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:subject:from:to:date:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=O/S4O6jjoUQzML/kr7X/RM+NpBRFOzxY6AQTpDfAoS7ufmRvneM+42tkjQNHSiAbL3 JJaFlZZ5n1fRcmPa0IkfpjBHu8/ZJfhvmQVo5IL7wiMcFU0Rq4PdJMkiVeto13yIq1gc uaTcAWS91jDOTPlEfmLoYS6WUNV4Cq+i15kI0= Received: by 10.223.115.13 with SMTP id g13mr7142894faq.9.1286049769135; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 13:02:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ecs ([213.8.162.222]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r5sm1324873faq.32.2010.10.02.13.02.47 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 02 Oct 2010 13:02:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4ca78fe8.8575df0a.0fdd.3721@mx.google.com> From: four.harrisons@googlemail.com To: lists@eitanadler.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 20:01:04 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: Re: ACPI & battery issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 20:02:52 -0000 Sorry for the top post - I'm on my mobile.=0D=0A=0D=0AI get the same mess= ages with the stock acpi on a Lenovo S10e. Someone on the acpi list (who'= s name I forget) wrote a patch which removes the error. If you think it m= ight help I'll root it out and forward it on.=0D=0A=0D=0ARegards,=0D=0A=0D= =0APeter Harrison=0D=0Awww.4harrisons.blogspot.com=0D=0A=0D=0A=0D=0A-----= ------------------------=0D=0AFrom:=09"Eitan Adler" =0D=0ASubject:=09ACPI & battery issues=0D=0ADate:=09=0902nd October 2010= 15:43=0D=0A=0D=0AI see=0D=0AACPI Exception: AE_NO_HARDWARE_RESPONSE, Ret= urned by Handler for=0D=0A[EmbeddedControl] (20100331/evregion-588)=0D=0A= ACPI Error (psparse-0633): Method parse/execution failed=0D=0A[\\_SB_.PCI= 0.LPCB.BAT1._BST] (Node 0xc6adba60),=0D=0AAE_NO_HARDWARE_RESPONSE=0D=0A=0D= =0Arepeatedly in dmesg=0D=0A=0D=0Asysctl's relating to battery informatio= n is also slow:=0D=0A% time sysctl hw.acpi.battery.state=0D=0Ahw.acpi.bat= tery.state: 7=0D=0Asysctl hw.acpi.battery.state 0.00s user 2.18s system = 72% cpu 3.006 total=0D=0A=0D=0A% time sysctl hw.acpi.battery=0D=0Ahw.acpi= =2Ebattery.life: -1=0D=0Ahw.acpi.battery.time: -1=0D=0Ahw.acpi.battery.st= ate: 7=0D=0Ahw.acpi.battery.units: 1=0D=0Ahw.acpi.battery.info_expire: 5=0D= =0Asysctl hw.acpi.battery 0.00s user 6.58s system 67% cpu 9.779 total=0D= =0A=0D=0Aalso note that the life and time are both negative one.=0D=0A=0D= =0AThis is on a Lenovo G530 laptop.=0D=0A--=20=0D=0AEitan Adler=0D=0A____= ___________________________________________=0D=0Afreebsd-questions@freebs= d.org mailing list=0D=0Ahttp://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd= -questions=0D=0ATo unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsub= scribe@freebsd.org"=0D=0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 21:02:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 554791065695 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 21:02:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B11A8FC1F for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 21:02:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn10 with SMTP id 10so403101iwn.13 for ; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 14:02:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.231.169.210 with SMTP id a18mr7782680ibz.5.1286053321492; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 14:02:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.166.77 with HTTP; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 14:01:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4ca78fe8.8575df0a.0fdd.3721@mx.google.com> References: <4ca78fe8.8575df0a.0fdd.3721@mx.google.com> From: Eitan Adler Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 17:01:41 -0400 Message-ID: To: four.harrisons@googlemail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ACPI & battery issues X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 21:02:03 -0000 On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 4:01 PM, wrote: > I get the same messages with the stock acpi on a Lenovo S10e. Someone on = the acpi list (who's name I forget) wrote a patch which removes the error. = If you think it might help I'll root it out and forward it on. I'll be happy to take a look at the patch and see if it solves my problem. does the patch just remove the error message or solve a specific problem that might be causing the issue? > ... > I see > ACPI Exception: AE_NO_HARDWARE_RESPONSE, Returned by Handler for > [EmbeddedControl] (20100331/evregion-588) > ACPI Error (psparse-0633): Method parse/execution failed > [\\_SB_.PCI0.LPCB.BAT1._BST] (Node 0xc6adba60), > AE_NO_HARDWARE_RESPONSE > > repeatedly in dmesg > > sysctl's relating to battery information is also slow: > % time sysctl hw.acpi.battery.state > hw.acpi.battery.state: 7 > sysctl hw.acpi.battery.state =C2=A00.00s user 2.18s system 72% cpu 3.006 = total > > % time sysctl hw.acpi.battery > hw.acpi.battery.life: -1 > hw.acpi.battery.time: -1 > hw.acpi.battery.state: 7 > hw.acpi.battery.units: 1 > hw.acpi.battery.info_expire: 5 > sysctl hw.acpi.battery =C2=A00.00s user 6.58s system 67% cpu 9.779 total > > also note that the life and time are both negative one. > > This is on a Lenovo G530 laptop. --=20 Eitan Adler From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 23:00:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3D6A1065679 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 23:00:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AEBD8FC0C for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 23:00:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id o92N00XD083576; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 17:00:00 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id o92N00Zd083573; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 17:00:00 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 17:00:00 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Robert In-Reply-To: <20101002113640.2ab36871@asus64> Message-ID: References: <20101002113640.2ab36871@asus64> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 02 Oct 2010 17:00:00 -0600 (MDT) Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: OT: fdisk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 23:00:03 -0000 On Sat, 2 Oct 2010, Robert wrote: > Greetings > > I am in deep with the wife. Her computer went belly up. It was running > XP pro and I had backups going to a second drive. I can no longer access > that drive. > > I pulled it and attached it via USB to one of my FreeBSD machines but > it will not mount. It is a 500G hard drive and I get _wild_ results just > looking at it with fdisk. > > ~> fdisk /dev/da1s1 > ******* Working on device /dev/da1s1 ******* Wait a minute... shouldn't that be just "da1"? da1s1 is the first slice (partition), and the data there should be your XP filesystem, probably NTFS. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 2 23:51:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10FEE1065670 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 23:51:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from traveling08@cox.net) Received: from fed1rmmtao107.cox.net (fed1rmmtao107.cox.net [68.230.241.39]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E224B8FC20 for ; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 23:51:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao107.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.00.01.00 201-2244-105-20090324) with ESMTP id <20101002235154.EFYL3990.fed1rmmtao107.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Sat, 2 Oct 2010 19:51:54 -0400 Received: from asus64 ([72.220.91.10]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id Dzrv1f00A0DQbeo04zrvUa; Sat, 02 Oct 2010 19:51:55 -0400 X-VR-Score: -230.00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=RFAs0e+2sU49DU7hBECFSPlG3t5ZI1He37/O2GpqT7s= c=1 sm=1 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=/nTdwXoUaSOHzX6NQnbKNQ==:17 a=s1O25tkdAAAA:8 a=mNL-uGBdAAAA:8 a=rzYPlMw5AAAA:8 a=vSnXl6LBziS7kwtMzLEA:9 a=jUPh2PS8JTdxQdIbaPwA:7 a=t_rJ8vtCeHOAzbbKRkgEEn_tXOkA:4 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=XZENvOEyztAA:10 a=OyOq_G8mXAEA:10 a=/nTdwXoUaSOHzX6NQnbKNQ==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none Date: Sat, 2 Oct 2010 16:51:50 -0700 From: Robert To: Warren Block Message-ID: <20101002165150.01e0cac0@asus64> In-Reply-To: References: <20101002113640.2ab36871@asus64> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: OT: fdisk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 02 Oct 2010 23:51:56 -0000 On Sat, 2 Oct 2010 17:00:00 -0600 (MDT) Warren Block wrote: > On Sat, 2 Oct 2010, Robert wrote: > > > Greetings > > > > I am in deep with the wife. Her computer went belly up. It was > > running XP pro and I had backups going to a second drive. I can no > > longer access that drive. > > > > I pulled it and attached it via USB to one of my FreeBSD machines > > but it will not mount. It is a 500G hard drive and I get _wild_ > > results just looking at it with fdisk. > > > > ~> fdisk /dev/da1s1 > > ******* Working on device /dev/da1s1 ******* > > Wait a minute... shouldn't that be just "da1"? da1s1 is the first > slice (partition), and the data there should be your XP filesystem, > probably NTFS. Warren, You are right. Here it is: ~> fdisk /dev/da1 ******* Working on device /dev/da1 ******* parameters extracted from in-core disklabel are: cylinders=60801 heads=255 sectors/track=63 (16065 blks/cyl) Figures below won't work with BIOS for partitions not in cyl 1 parameters to be used for BIOS calculations are: cylinders=60801 heads=255 sectors/track=63 (16065 blks/cyl) Media sector size is 512 Warning: BIOS sector numbering starts with sector 1 Information from DOS bootblock is: The data for partition 1 is: sysid 7 (0x07),(NTFS, OS/2 HPFS, QNX-2 (16 bit) or Advanced UNIX) start 63, size 976773105 (476939 Meg), flag 0 beg: cyl 0/ head 1/ sector 1; end: cyl 1023/ head 15/ sector 63 The data for partition 2 is: The data for partition 3 is: The data for partition 4 is: Which looks a lot better. I can mount /dev/da1 and it shows ~> ls -l /mnt total 70044 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 2560 Dec 31 1600 $AttrDef -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 0 Oct 1 09:09 $BadClus -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4194304 Dec 31 1600 $Bitmap -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 8192 Oct 1 09:09 $Boot drwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 0 Oct 1 09:09 $Extend -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 67108864 Oct 1 09:09 $LogFile -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 4096 Oct 1 09:09 $MFTMirr -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 0 Dec 31 1600 $Secure -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 131072 Oct 1 09:09 $UpCase -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 0 Oct 1 09:09 $Volume -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 45124 Aug 18 2001 NTDETECT.COM drwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 0 Oct 1 17:29 System Volume Information -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 193 Oct 1 09:12 boot.ini -rwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 222368 Aug 18 2001 ntldr But I cannot mount /dev/da1s1 ~> sudo mount_ntfs /dev/da1s1 /mnt mount_ntfs: /dev/da1s1: Invalid argument Patrick wrote May be "photorec" will help (in systutils/testdisk). http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/PhotoRec I installed this and can successfully recover the date to a spare slice. The problem is the data is all over the place. There is a ton if png files from her playing games on facebook. This can be better than nothing because I can go through the files and move/rename the ones we want to keep. Thank you both. I am willing to try any other suggestions. It appears the the motherboard went gradually bad and hosed up this drive. Robert