From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 21 04:31:19 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BC5CBB9527 for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 04:31:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@shaneware.biz) Received: from ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5617128D for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 04:31:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@shaneware.biz) Received: from ppp14-2-4-72.lns21.adl2.internode.on.net (HELO leader.local) ([14.2.4.72]) by ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 21 Aug 2016 14:01:09 +0930 Subject: Re: graphics/gd marked as broken? To: Grzegorz Junka , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <19ccaf07-1c70-1372-f507-acdad19917f1@utanet.at> <0dc2dd7c-020f-101d-1f76-0b2ad1f3bac0@gjunka.com> <91eccaaf-248b-836d-ae6e-9b9b7f31065c@gjunka.com> From: Shane Ambler Message-ID: Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 14:01:07 +0930 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <91eccaaf-248b-836d-ae6e-9b9b7f31065c@gjunka.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 04:31:19 -0000 On 21/08/2016 04:46, Grzegorz Junka wrote: > > On 20/08/2016 19:11, Grzegorz Junka wrote: >> >> On 20/08/2016 16:23, Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: >>> The port is not broken, it compiles in port and with poudriere. >>> Only if option WEBP is set to on it is broken. >>> >>> look with >>> >>> poudriere options -C -jhailname graphics/gd >>> >>> how is it set, and change it if is to on. >> >> So, poudriere lies then, it says it's broken: >> >> [00:01:21] ====>> [04][00:00:00] Starting build of graphics/gd >> [00:01:21] ====>> [04][00:00:00] Finished build of graphics/gd: >> Ignored: is marked as broken: circular dependencies >> >> Greg > > Sorry, I should have been clearer. I know the port isn't broken, I just > don't understand why poudriere says it's marked as broken if, according > to you, it's a circular dependency and the port isn't marked in any way? > Greg Actually it isn't poudriere - the port itself says it's broken when the WEBP option is enabled. WEBP_BROKEN= circular dependencies So the new version of gd added support for webp, the maintainer added the option to enable it, then marked the option as broken. gd doesn't have WEBP enabled by default so you have settings somewhere to enable it. If you aren't specifically enabling the WEBP option for gd then check that you aren't enabling it globally in OPTIONS_SET In the make.conf for your build add - graphics_gd_UNSET= WEBP If that doesn't work some others to try. graphics_gd_UNSET_FORCE= WEBP OPTIONS_UNSET=WEBP OPTIONS_UNSET_FORCE=WEBP -- FreeBSD - the place to B...Software Developing Shane Ambler From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 21 06:08:02 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0C40BC078C for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 06:08:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@shaneware.biz) Received: from ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D06F1944 for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 06:08:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@shaneware.biz) Received: from ppp14-2-4-72.lns21.adl2.internode.on.net (HELO leader.local) ([14.2.4.72]) by ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 21 Aug 2016 15:37:59 +0930 Subject: Re: Problems with out libgcc_s.so in base To: Diane Bruce References: <20160814230351.GA10587@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20160814233430.GA35872@night.db.net> <20160817211710.GA59205@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20160818111521.7f79b9f8@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20160819011432.6f2eadbd@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20160819004304.GA94021@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <9663a390-080e-462d-84d7-2a27987b83e5@ShaneWare.Biz> <20160820120056.GA1475@night.db.net> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Shane Ambler Message-ID: Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 15:37:58 +0930 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160820120056.GA1475@night.db.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 06:08:02 -0000 On 20/08/2016 21:30, Diane Bruce wrote: > On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 03:04:44PM +0930, Shane Ambler wrote: >> On 19/08/2016 10:13, Steven G. Kargl wrote: > ... >> You should find that all newer copies of libgcc_s contain compatibility >> support for binaries that were linked to earlier versions. >> > > Indeed. And the version masquerading as a GNU libgcc_s in base > does the same thing. Two problems: our base libgcc_s only covers version up > to GCC_4.2.0 and there is a name conflict on the library name with > libgcc_s from the gnu compiler. Hence if a program links against base > libgcc_s first then requires libgfortran which itself requires support > for above GCC_4.2.0, the program fails. OR Whenever a program requires > support that is missing on the platform it is running on from our > libgcc_s, it will fail. > > There are numerous PR's on this which all have the common problem > of linking with a libgcc_s that does not support > GCC_4.2.0 Actually the problem is going the other way. A port gets compiled and linked against the newer libs but at run time it finds the base system lib first and loads that which doesn't support the binary that is being run. If the gcc6 libgcc_s was always installed and found first then we wouldn't have this problem. I first found this issue trying to import numpy into blender. As blender had started and was using the base libgcc_s, when I tried to import numpy that needed the newer libgcc_s for it's fortran code it failed. I discovered that setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH in the environment when starting blender got it to load the newer libgcc_s which then worked when importing numpy, so I've been happy doing that for a couple of years. I have seen the same thing were a python module has brought in the base libgcc_s before numpy which needed the newer one. The dynamic loading of python modules seems to be the only time I have seen this. Either changing the import order or LD_LIBRARY_PATH to get the newer lib loaded the first time has solved the issue. So one solution could be to copy the newer libgcc_s into /lib but the newer library won't get added to base as it contains GPLv3 code. Maybe remove /lib/libgcc_s.so to force the search for a newer version. While bug reports have lead to other things, I think the solution might be to configure/patch ld to get it searching paths to find the newer version first. libgcc_s would be such a common case that we could have a permanent ld setting in base to always find a newer libgcc_s before the base version. I haven't been bitten enough to have looked at this. -- FreeBSD - the place to B...Software Developing Shane Ambler From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 21 06:20:50 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F201BC0961 for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 06:20:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@shaneware.biz) Received: from ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3CA81DBE for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 06:20:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@shaneware.biz) Received: from ppp14-2-4-72.lns21.adl2.internode.on.net (HELO leader.local) ([14.2.4.72]) by ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 21 Aug 2016 15:50:48 +0930 To: FreeBSD-ports From: Shane Ambler Subject: Can a commiter look at devel/godot Message-ID: <9421d18a-e1e8-b6f6-6ab2-78e403a553af@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 15:50:47 +0930 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 06:20:50 -0000 After several changes over the last few months it would be nice if the update to devel/godot and the new devel/godot-tools could get committed. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209742 Thanks -- FreeBSD - the place to B...Software Developing Shane Ambler From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 21 08:02:14 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A419BC0244 for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 08:02:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD47A196A for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 08:02:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1bbNhq-0006Ki-1a; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 10:02:10 +0200 Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 10:02:10 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Lo=EFc?= BLOT Cc: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: mail/rainloop needs a committer Message-ID: <20160821080209.GO96200@home.opsec.eu> References: <1471721848.12240.0.camel@unix-experience.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1471721848.12240.0.camel@unix-experience.fr> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 08:02:14 -0000 Hi! > I validated a good diff for mail/rainloop, can a commiter push it to > ports tree ? > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211870 Done. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 21 09:21:26 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6936BC149E for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 09:21:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from www@pendlecoldstore.co.uk) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9446E158C for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 09:21:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from www@pendlecoldstore.co.uk) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 8FE9FBC149D; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 09:21:26 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F880BC149A for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 09:21:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from www@pendlecoldstore.co.uk) Received: from p3computers.viper.enta.net (p3computers.viper.enta.net [62.249.212.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45864158A for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 09:21:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from www@pendlecoldstore.co.uk) Received: by p3computers.viper.enta.net (Postfix, from userid 1934) id 9971A20FD4; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 10:13:24 +0100 (BST) To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Courier was unable to deliver the parcel, ID00000142024 X-PHP-Originating-Script: 1934:post.php(6) : regexp code(1) : eval()'d code(17) : eval()'d code Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 10:13:24 +0100 From: "FedEx 2Day A.M." Reply-To: "FedEx 2Day A.M." Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 09:21:26 -0000 Dear Customer, This is to confirm that one or more of your parcels has been shipped. Please, download Delivery Label attached to this email. Yours trully, Roy Mccabe, Operation Manager. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 21 10:27:57 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04619BB9582 for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 10:27:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wodfer@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x22f.google.com (mail-wm0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9155812CB for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 10:27:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wodfer@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id i5so101297486wmg.0 for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 03:27:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=NUH29Zajmc9m4Hv79l1gjGXhO8NM5bkYitwW86C2C2Q=; b=MK/yw0FZNp2vaTlxsoi+uyHUou6fy9tXcfbllyV57wKhpLn9m5x/Y/YllqTNYrERAn 2CunhPz+J7+U0QMZmJ8VFpQnovNff9eJLtI1zuKpH6MukL1lcr5f4yFIcGqbPqUIIqQJ YH+dw/4C/Sz1OCTvaGTbzHgSwrO9Y4oI1KH9LfVXGJVkOdMH4oNyHOSn/0wTqf1eBc0B ZJ2OyNG8xr26dOUubVLtIm2x8Eo1fEdLRYidBb0ago7X9nmTVXTtK8ootT/7FIlV5APL UfspYSV3zTpmdbPTRq2s7ZFTz0NA/yEK9PBJFYITkCuFGVqriK2Gb/i3x5YWfRxTcAch qbEw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=NUH29Zajmc9m4Hv79l1gjGXhO8NM5bkYitwW86C2C2Q=; b=gJeMyWWlk44kigXtf0H5uz+9epe4MkPUX2IC5rMTCzoRhpjGHH/m8ay0w6GYWyLTIA 9zE4CrFQueM5ihnmx/O6szWU4Ga5YLBbbACp4apEyTzIUzrOv2xX6K9Duyna1rtM4wuz SnRDQNmioysmBKh0pNvbb9pkXe5vNEb4sgLFbNdT/qGDsNblWjtHpudGAfCk1rjACC/V Dbuocp9CfBebTID/66JT7AAj4m7xF+oY5KAqJZvUpA5dge6w+9hACnPA03BuAUZadw8d DDSfyIOvqNnWduTFHg5KPBKP8S4ETCot+14ne40QkUbyhKci2FIEYpCiuy2gN2g5EYFs GFZQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoous35JyXTVCGG9lyLEpxl2N8LrMbtOgdqga1Dl8xPovXOqdtIBmbuweoOFLmcFB69rr72Jeb0h+0/G3KwQ== X-Received: by 10.28.125.80 with SMTP id y77mr11345905wmc.25.1471775274533; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 03:27:54 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.165.150 with HTTP; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 03:27:53 -0700 (PDT) From: Andy Wodfer Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 12:27:53 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: php7-extensions PDF (PECL-PDFLIB) fails To: freebsd-ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 10:27:57 -0000 Hi, I recently upgraded to 10.3 REL on a test server. I'm trying to install all the latest versions for Apache, mysql, php and so on. php7 is installed and works perfectly with apache. However, I couldn't install the extension pecl-pdflib from the php7 extensions port, it fails with the message doesn't supprt php7. ===> phpMyAdmin-4.6.0 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/php/20151012/openssl.so - found ===> Returning to build of phpMyAdmin-4.6.0 ===> phpMyAdmin-4.6.0 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/php/20151012/pdf.so - not found ===> pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 cannot be installed: doesn't work with lang/php70 port (doesn't support PHP 70). *** Error code 1 Stop. make[2]: stopped in /usr/ports/print/pecl-pdflib *** Error code 1 Stop. make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/databases/phpmyadmin *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/databases/phpmyadmin I need this extension to create PDF files from an application my client is running. Anyone? Thanks, Andy From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 21 10:50:03 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 962A3BB9959 for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 10:50:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Lena@lena.kiev.ua) Received: from lena.kiev.ua (lena.kiev.ua [212.109.198.40]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55B6418A6 for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 10:50:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Lena@lena.kiev.ua) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lena.kiev.ua; s=3; h=Content-Type:Mime-Version:Message-ID:Subject:To:From: Date:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=x8REnPnSHZSDoIUDdMc2Zqitzg0Yr6v+uVGRe46v3Dg=; b=cfWwmgnVC/WlvEFkQm8pwbr1Cm jknY9WkIVVff4+an0HFi4weXu7e6BBrYQnM6s33cfd9WvDNJAOoSIB/J84dzBqFCAH93WZJkFOwJ0 4NZGyldXQbbvYZrmJzXUHR2uJ301O/7Sc6jQ6b7jxCop/p73mA7tzUcjleA8PaH6cJpM=; Received: from ip-384c.rusanovka-net.kiev.ua ([94.244.56.76] helo=bedside.lena.kiev.ua) by lena.kiev.ua with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1bbQKF-0001nl-Pm for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 13:50:00 +0300 Received: from bedside.lena.kiev.ua (localhost.lena.kiev.ua [127.0.0.1]) by bedside.lena.kiev.ua (8.15.2/8.15.1) with ESMTP id u7LAnpds052739 for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 13:49:51 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from Lena@lena.kiev.ua) Received: (from lena@localhost) by bedside.lena.kiev.ua (8.15.2/8.15.1/Submit) id u7LAnpLL052738 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 13:49:51 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from Lena@lena.kiev.ua) Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 13:49:51 +0300 From: Lena@lena.kiev.ua To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: iso-codes Message-ID: <20160821104951.GL916@lena.kiev> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 10:50:03 -0000 Does the latest version of the port misc/iso-codes really need python 3 for build? Python 2.7 not enough? https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/misc/iso-codes/Makefile?r1=409133&r2=420522 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 21 11:21:02 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6B95BBF27E for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 11:21:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from msa1.earth.yoonka.com (yoonka.com [185.24.122.233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "msa1.earth.yoonka.com", Issuer "msa1.earth.yoonka.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C7A01732 for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 11:21:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from crayon2.yoonka.com (crayon2.yoonka.com [10.70.7.20]) (authenticated bits=0) by msa1.earth.yoonka.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u7LBKspL036504 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 11:20:54 GMT (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Subject: Re: graphics/gd marked as broken? To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <19ccaf07-1c70-1372-f507-acdad19917f1@utanet.at> <0dc2dd7c-020f-101d-1f76-0b2ad1f3bac0@gjunka.com> <91eccaaf-248b-836d-ae6e-9b9b7f31065c@gjunka.com> From: Grzegorz Junka Message-ID: Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 11:20:54 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 11:21:02 -0000 On 21/08/2016 04:31, Shane Ambler wrote: > On 21/08/2016 04:46, Grzegorz Junka wrote: >> >> On 20/08/2016 19:11, Grzegorz Junka wrote: >>> >>> On 20/08/2016 16:23, Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: >>>> The port is not broken, it compiles in port and with poudriere. >>>> Only if option WEBP is set to on it is broken. >>>> >>>> look with >>>> >>>> poudriere options -C -jhailname graphics/gd >>>> >>>> how is it set, and change it if is to on. >>> >>> So, poudriere lies then, it says it's broken: >>> >>> [00:01:21] ====>> [04][00:00:00] Starting build of graphics/gd >>> [00:01:21] ====>> [04][00:00:00] Finished build of graphics/gd: >>> Ignored: is marked as broken: circular dependencies >>> >>> Greg >> >> Sorry, I should have been clearer. I know the port isn't broken, I just >> don't understand why poudriere says it's marked as broken if, according >> to you, it's a circular dependency and the port isn't marked in any way? >> Greg > > Actually it isn't poudriere - the port itself says it's broken when the > WEBP option is enabled. > > WEBP_BROKEN= circular dependencies > > So the new version of gd added support for webp, the maintainer added > the option to enable it, then marked the option as broken. > > gd doesn't have WEBP enabled by default so you have settings somewhere > to enable it. If you aren't specifically enabling the WEBP option for > gd then check that you aren't enabling it globally in OPTIONS_SET > > In the make.conf for your build add - > graphics_gd_UNSET= WEBP > > If that doesn't work some others to try. > graphics_gd_UNSET_FORCE= WEBP > OPTIONS_UNSET=WEBP > OPTIONS_UNSET_FORCE=WEBP > Thanks Shane. I actually enabled the option in graphics/gd and it was working fine. It only broke after an update the the ports tree. I had it enabled in many other packages so didn't think it might be a problem. Disabling the option makes the error go away and poudriere now is able to compile gd. I didn't know a maintainer can mark a port as broken only if a particular option is enabled, I thought that the whole port is either marked as broken or not. Greg From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 21 11:46:56 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE03EBBF8C8 for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 11:46:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.117.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B6B5131F for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 11:46:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from liminal.local (liminal.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3636:3bff:fed4:b0d6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D1357E6DF for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 11:46:44 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/D1357E6DF; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral Subject: Re: php7-extensions PDF (PECL-PDFLIB) fails To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: From: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <8629e22f-8fb1-184d-f562-a7821f98c184@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 12:46:38 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FPcMp0fQ0Pp3R4n9hMiBEQ2dF6gHlltwQ" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 11:46:56 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --FPcMp0fQ0Pp3R4n9hMiBEQ2dF6gHlltwQ Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="bApUKsxGaikA9hpNoMTlFeB4QV27Rlgcp" From: Matthew Seaman To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <8629e22f-8fb1-184d-f562-a7821f98c184@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: php7-extensions PDF (PECL-PDFLIB) fails References: In-Reply-To: --bApUKsxGaikA9hpNoMTlFeB4QV27Rlgcp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 21/08/2016 11:27, Andy Wodfer wrote: > I recently upgraded to 10.3 REL on a test server. I'm trying to install= all > the latest versions for Apache, mysql, php and so on. >=20 > php7 is installed and works perfectly with apache. However, I couldn't > install the extension pecl-pdflib from the php7 extensions port, it fai= ls > with the message doesn't supprt php7. >=20 > =3D=3D=3D> phpMyAdmin-4.6.0 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/php/20151= 012/openssl.so > - found > =3D=3D=3D> Returning to build of phpMyAdmin-4.6.0 > =3D=3D=3D> phpMyAdmin-4.6.0 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/php/20151= 012/pdf.so > - not found > =3D=3D=3D> pecl-pdflib-3.0.4 cannot be installed: doesn't work with la= ng/php70 > port (doesn't support PHP 70). > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop. > make[2]: stopped in /usr/ports/print/pecl-pdflib > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop. > make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/databases/phpmyadmin > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop. > make: stopped in /usr/ports/databases/phpmyadmin >=20 > I need this extension to create PDF files from an application my client= is > running. Anyone? Ah, so you definitely need the pdflib extension? That means your only option here is to downgrade to php-5.6 I'm afraid. (Otherwise you could simply have dropped the PDF support from phpMyAdmin.) Hmmm... it's odd that there's apparently no fix freely available to make pecl-pdflib work with php-7 by this late date. There is apparently something commercially available from the pdflib people themselves, but obviously, you have to pay for that: https://www.pdflib.com/fileadmin/pdflib/System_Requirements/PDFlib-9.0.7-= system-requirements.txt Also, no idea if phpMyAdmin can use the PHP bindings there. Cheers, Matthew --bApUKsxGaikA9hpNoMTlFeB4QV27Rlgcp-- --FPcMp0fQ0Pp3R4n9hMiBEQ2dF6gHlltwQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJXuZSkXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkAThKgQAI5a/qKCRyF33Gzq3h9PAEzs /r3pLuU8zqbsv4/AoEeyNznSKy8oHikEM3AFU5iQK7gIq42WFiFlyhJl/IHaDC3f LHSSXNWpCyXU/3MxspJhX4g3DaYm56u+8j2LwNYZBsmi13LDKmEyWQeyhHPJn8uo hAg2yzx6CT5MDNDXAJJnEFhrzmdg139y5vV5UAygNAuzG/Ohx+0udirHE9w6BDRF v4Ic/6y78mhoHH0j0MpS+PlnNVEedw5g9i5cbeVq82h/5dDxvo/NqnEgwQuvbe/r X+HPwl8uGq1TjX2O/NJs8Alr1liTml0jKx/WeX04SNtiFznd27riGuOXRarIDRqP Jcs+Ee+H3/jKXc7Z28yP5rrCp8ClQVT0YcmRAJGYXXC7TLmJe39GgF2Eoiifau6p bZl+36zzo0j/ziD71EbI5QxWzPXEpjA/tTts1ZjTuuDKkqRaHuNmGe1Ef/B9Eg1r DmO2B09THNFuXrNJIbgZqBvaGezmf2BWkPtCC4FUHljXdPqBxZHuNdtovaEwgoKk sRt4dBwZQWNjKHVCiJkiD43k+T9bULunJPUa+Uzsu+0Kk75hx5f/C1/f/ZE2jF2z XyvxkMEnAY5b00N3waS8m5dR2NYBt8PraRj302YEIdt2kWsuTQvWuNFVjFyFCIeK gvbx/rwIBNaLzbvFQd4W =kv76 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FPcMp0fQ0Pp3R4n9hMiBEQ2dF6gHlltwQ-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 21 13:43:01 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A7ABC1264 for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 13:43:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from db@db.net) Received: from diana.db.net (diana.db.net [66.113.102.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DDE0170E for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 13:43:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from db@db.net) Received: from night.db.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diana.db.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED1F82AA3A3; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 07:42:08 -0600 (MDT) Received: by night.db.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E90F61CDE5; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 09:42:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 09:42:48 -0400 From: Diane Bruce To: Shane Ambler Cc: Diane Bruce , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problems with out libgcc_s.so in base Message-ID: <20160821134248.GA12521@night.db.net> References: <20160814230351.GA10587@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20160814233430.GA35872@night.db.net> <20160817211710.GA59205@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20160818111521.7f79b9f8@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20160819011432.6f2eadbd@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20160819004304.GA94021@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <9663a390-080e-462d-84d7-2a27987b83e5@ShaneWare.Biz> <20160820120056.GA1475@night.db.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 13:43:01 -0000 On Sun, Aug 21, 2016 at 03:37:58PM +0930, Shane Ambler wrote: > On 20/08/2016 21:30, Diane Bruce wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 20, 2016 at 03:04:44PM +0930, Shane Ambler wrote: > >> On 19/08/2016 10:13, Steven G. Kargl wrote: > > ... > >> You should find that all newer copies of libgcc_s contain compatibility > >> support for binaries that were linked to earlier versions. > >> > > ... > > Actually the problem is going the other way. A port gets compiled and > linked against the newer libs but at run time it finds the base system *sigh* No. > lib first and loads that which doesn't support the binary that is being > run. If the gcc6 libgcc_s was always installed and found first then we > wouldn't have this problem. That's exactly what the -Wl,rpath=/usr/local/lib/lib.... is supposed to do. Look at /usr/ports/Mk/Uses/gfortran.mk FFLAGS+= -Wl,-rpath=${LOCALBASE}/lib/gcc${_GCC_VER} FCFLAGS+= -Wl,-rpath=${LOCALBASE}/lib/gcc${_GCC_VER} LDFLAGS+= -Wl,-rpath=${LOCALBASE}/lib/gcc${_GCC_VER} -L${LOCALBASE}/lib/gcc${_GCC_VER} -B${LOCALBASE}/bin Any use of GCC to compile a port *SHOULD* have the same -rpath otherwise it gets linked with our base libgcc_s which is *harmless* 99% of the time. The cases where it isn't are outlined here: https://people.freebsd.org/~db/libgcc.txt Your problem is cmake here. >From blender Makefile USES= cmake:outsource compiler:features desktop-file-utils \ jpeg python:3.5 shebangfix Look at this PR https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20812 What happens is cmake strips the necessary rpath when it installs the final binary. This hack: add to CMAKE_ARGS -DCMAKE_INSTALL_RPATH:STRING="${LOCALBASE}/lib/gcc${_GCC_VER}" Will tell cmake to not strip the necessary gcc rpath information. BTW I'd be interested if this fixed blender for you. However, if this is the way to fix these problems, then it should be documented or fixed cmake. However a naive non ports infrastructure build using gcc/gfortran or cmake will still run into these problems. > > I first found this issue trying to import numpy into blender. As blender > had started and was using the base libgcc_s, when I tried to import > numpy that needed the newer libgcc_s for it's fortran code it failed. I > discovered that setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH in the environment when starting > blender got it to load the newer libgcc_s which then worked when Yes. Or a LD_PRELOAD (man rtld) The stanza added in the ports infrastructure is a kludge added to work around our out of date base libgcc_s.so > importing numpy, so I've been happy doing that for a couple of years. This is exactly the sort of bugs that have been reported in the ports system for years. > > I have seen the same thing were a python module has brought in the base > libgcc_s before numpy which needed the newer one. The dynamic loading of > python modules seems to be the only time I have seen this. Either > changing the import order or LD_LIBRARY_PATH to get the newer lib loaded > the first time has solved the issue. Yep. You are SOL if your base program does not have a -rpath linking /usr/local/lib libgcc_s first. (BTW A LD_PRELOAD will fix your problem here as it forces the port libgcc_s to be already loaded before rtld has to search for it. It will satisfy the linking requirements without messing around with LD_LIBRARY_PATH) Any program that does a dlopen then requiring a ports libgcc_s will also fail, not just python. > > So one solution could be to copy the newer libgcc_s into /lib but the > newer library won't get added to base as it contains GPLv3 code. Maybe > remove /lib/libgcc_s.so to force the search for a newer version. If you read my original post. (Did you read it?) That's exactly what I suggest. We should rename it to libcc_s.so ... > -- > FreeBSD - the place to B...Software Developing > > Shane Ambler > > Diane Bruce (Getting tired and testy at explaining this bug 1000 times) -- - db@FreeBSD.org db@db.net http://www.db.net/~db From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 21 16:42:40 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 977B6BC1DCC for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 16:42:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-x233.google.com (mail-pa0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61BAC15F7; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 16:42:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pa0-x233.google.com with SMTP id fi15so30053070pac.1; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 09:42:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:reply-to:subject:references:to:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=nnsqxa4y3HwfIFCzrfuM3AZ1QXT734vYN+sr6PJ3e2I=; b=xlY8OxSnPcNoxEBEuuQ3mDlATsDBbSk1hUFlbPrtdh81CuWUUsVAxhxakM2CJ85LWo ESiBg52WdC9pRVYfXH5DKSayNpuNlYrmveah5qWXENPoselnaviRhPgaBnYOJp9xD9TL QvN1AQByNQK3LEq0mqEIAPvyPZNMtgagUJnA+CNl1F5RyPiUHU6KexydJkLl2r55cfq8 dZVzrllFgfg/XXNAfqmgvkdRq+kuyvdHjGso9CIFhtB6jKfBsxkmaZG7utd+dIuOYJmI ANVsc26Qbh+Cc0anFbi18/pbAntTnjHpgVUdGMyd1wb9mxooCrvSZ3j40iRWB2RYTY+y /sVA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:reply-to:subject:references:to:cc:from :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=nnsqxa4y3HwfIFCzrfuM3AZ1QXT734vYN+sr6PJ3e2I=; b=Lu4dTnirnlr+vPSepvvOxLevMzznok79pxcimDjoRwPG5TFhaB5ljNbHDzRJDBYXBU fpEJTg2SRwHjHMJ8U5iD4ovr1kfexFyMBjpiLHw2rla6JNJyyAthLzATY6eHzJ/iVpxJ LinjP4csop/SBihWbSNfyb7PwuUQwB4tOWXmewQ1Q5tCDT/IeworuEigtiGKFWG9+JUD JZomg8cjXWcFZZyJouoNEcQ9jBU0+OQNgcfdSe13P4DWZw2kWgVaFpwKLLdkqf81cblW awtTRwJL2LFD+/OZNXZ0SUL+HZhQC8hY98wd0NPWBML5Q0qpJklFNA0NmNTlh5aiQ389 3/Hw== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouunAcRNGlsqTaxTf77hajoG+jcPdIcqGbWoyQ0lZWv59tyLwrwYMtK1b07XpCOFQA== X-Received: by 10.66.79.138 with SMTP id j10mr34426136pax.60.1471797759788; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 09:42:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:44b8:31ae:7b01:bcc4:50e5:1f4:95e1? (2001-44b8-31ae-7b01-bcc4-50e5-01f4-95e1.static.ipv6.internode.on.net. [2001:44b8:31ae:7b01:bcc4:50e5:1f4:95e1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 191sm21095369pfx.68.2016.08.21.09.42.37 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 21 Aug 2016 09:42:39 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Kubilay Kocak Reply-To: koobs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: iso-codes References: <20160821104951.GL916@lena.kiev> To: Lena@lena.kiev.ua Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Koop Mast From: Kubilay Kocak Message-ID: <08f0f320-f4c3-233c-d43a-015a31bc879e@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 02:42:35 +1000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:50.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/50.0a2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160821104951.GL916@lena.kiev> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 16:42:40 -0000 On 21/08/2016 8:49 PM, Lena@lena.kiev.ua wrote: > Does the latest version of the port misc/iso-codes really need python 3 > for build? > > Python 2.7 not enough? > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/misc/iso-codes/Makefile?r1=409133&r2=420522 A grep of the sources shows many references to python3 (calling script), including: bin/validate_json_data.py:#!/usr/bin/env python3 bin/xml_from_json.py:#!/usr/bin/env python3 bin/pot_from_json.py:#!/usr/bin/env python3 bin/check_valid_utf8.py:#!/usr/bin/env python3 And in the build system: common.mk: python3 $(top_srcdir)/bin/pot_from_json.py $(DOMAIN) $(top_srcdir)/data common.mk: python3 $(top_srcdir)/bin/xml_from_json.py $(DOMAIN) $(top_srcdir)/data $@ common.mk: python3 $(top_srcdir)/bin/check_valid_utf8.py $(pofiles) I didn't check whether this was a recent change (new in 3.69) or not. These could/should be updated to use python3.x scripts directly instead, rather then the python3 symlink provided by lang/python3. This could be done with judicious use of USES=shebangfix Maintainer CC'd Hope that helps Lena ./koobs From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 21 18:46:36 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81A99BC1E8F for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 18:46:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abi@abinet.ru) Received: from mail.abinet.ru (mail.abinet.ru [136.243.72.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 490841697 for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 18:46:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abi@abinet.ru) Received: from [10.0.0.1] (unknown [10.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.abinet.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 252B824E7A for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 18:40:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=abinet.ru; s=dkim; t=1471804841; bh=CLd2K3W2ouVqYC2hZ+JffDPJbyDVQjJ1lQdx1rFQ56I=; h=Date:From:To:Subject; b=lqdzlwUoAEiVtxFxhSGR3tuAUiPJHbPSUJi3hxoKQBUyVwQBox85i+ZQ7yAGVMMJJ VuI4a0HTbsxIClJp5cSZYEsVxGhCg7NcyCSWL7IijV2CL+yfn7xcd7bPmW+fAERPUb svjNNA32KzI5Z0JgFvv/OhH2hE4TQXLcTJiq3L1g= Message-ID: <57B9F5A8.2020905@abinet.ru> Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 21:40:40 +0300 From: abi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:) Gecko/20160112 FossaMail/25.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Needed committer, multimedia/zoneminder forgotten again :( Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 18:46:36 -0000 Hello, can anyone commit https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211681 ? This fixes build under CURRENT. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 21 19:35:08 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0981BC0CD7 for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 19:35:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kwm@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtpq6.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq6.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.42.169]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A05F41365; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 19:35:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kwm@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [212.54.42.116] (helo=lsmtp2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq6.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bbYEL-0002h0-AI; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 21:16:25 +0200 Received: from 178-84-134-112.dynamic.upc.nl ([178.84.134.112] helo=[192.168.0.51]) by lsmtp2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bbYEL-0004vm-7K; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 21:16:25 +0200 Message-ID: <1471806984.2646.4.camel@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: iso-codes From: Koop Mast To: koobs@FreeBSD.org, Lena@lena.kiev.ua Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 21:16:24 +0200 In-Reply-To: <08f0f320-f4c3-233c-d43a-015a31bc879e@FreeBSD.org> References: <20160821104951.GL916@lena.kiev> <08f0f320-f4c3-233c-d43a-015a31bc879e@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Ziggo-spambar: / X-Ziggo-spamscore: 0.0 X-Ziggo-spamreport: CMAE Analysis: v=2.1 cv=Dt6rgzL+ c=1 sm=0 tr=0 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=7z1cN_iqozsA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=tS1qzdGnnUQ1SefVEaEA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=IjZwj45LgO3ly-622nXo:22 xcat=Undefined/Undefined none X-Ziggo-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Flag: No X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 19:35:09 -0000 On Mon, 2016-08-22 at 02:42 +1000, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > On 21/08/2016 8:49 PM, Lena@lena.kiev.ua wrote: > > > > Does the latest version of the port misc/iso-codes really need > > python 3 > > for build? > > > > Python 2.7 not enough? > > > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/misc/iso-codes/Makefile?r1=40 > > 9133&r2=420522 > A grep of the sources shows many references to python3 (calling > script), > including: I think Lena is more wondering about the new build requirement off python3. As your pointed out the scripts require python3, there is not much I can do about that. I also don't see much point in trying to bash the scripts into shape using the full version (3.4 in this case) python version since they are only used during build time. -Koop > bin/validate_json_data.py:#!/usr/bin/env python3 > bin/xml_from_json.py:#!/usr/bin/env python3 > bin/pot_from_json.py:#!/usr/bin/env python3 > bin/check_valid_utf8.py:#!/usr/bin/env python3 > > And in the build system: > > common.mk:      python3 $(top_srcdir)/bin/pot_from_json.py $(DOMAIN) > $(top_srcdir)/data > common.mk:      python3 $(top_srcdir)/bin/xml_from_json.py $(DOMAIN) > $(top_srcdir)/data $@ > common.mk:      python3 $(top_srcdir)/bin/check_valid_utf8.py > $(pofiles) > > I didn't check whether this was a recent change (new in 3.69) or not. > > These could/should be updated to use python3.x scripts directly > instead, > rather then the python3 symlink provided by lang/python3. This could > be > done with judicious use of USES=shebangfix > > Maintainer CC'd > > Hope that helps Lena > > ./koobs From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 21 21:12:15 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6B5ABC144A for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 21:12:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crees@physics.org) Received: from mail36c50.megamailservers.eu (mail226c50.megamailservers.eu [91.136.10.236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 386401E73 for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 21:12:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crees@physics.org) X-Authenticated-User: bayofrum.uwclub.net Received: from pegasus.bayofrum.net (host-2-102-106-111.as13285.net [2.102.106.111]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail36c50.megamailservers.eu (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id u7LKwn6s028681; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 20:58:51 +0000 Received: from android-2959dc0305d63573.bayofrum.net (android-2959dc0305d63573.bayofrum.net [192.168.1.104]) by pegasus.bayofrum.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4AC5B49D8; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 21:58:26 +0100 (BST) User-Agent: K-9 Mail for Android In-Reply-To: <57B9F5A8.2020905@abinet.ru> References: <57B9F5A8.2020905@abinet.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: Needed committer, multimedia/zoneminder forgotten again :( From: Chris Rees Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 21:58:27 +0100 To: abi , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <00E62FDA-A6D7-4CC1-90A7-77049ACDB7AE@physics.org> X-bayofrum-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-bayofrum-MailScanner-ID: 4AC5B49D8.A3A32 X-bayofrum-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-bayofrum-MailScanner-From: crees@physics.org X-Spam-Status: No X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A0B0206.57BA160B.00A1, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0 X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-Score: 0.000 X-CTCH-Rules: X-CTCH-Flags: 0 X-CTCH-ScoreCust: 0.000 X-CSC: 0 X-CHA: v=2.1 cv=N6YQSQNB c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=gIyif6r13gc5Hj8RuoB4yw==:117 a=gIyif6r13gc5Hj8RuoB4yw==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=7z1cN_iqozsA:10 a=Fr-isnatAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=wW0svjmTV1EgS_fDcN4A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=P0S6o3SJAAAA:8 a=FO8Ti2APIrY3oEk3NyAA:9 a=94C7PNHsC3Qr0Lsh:21 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=-FEs8UIgK8oA:10 a=NWVoK91CQyQA:10 a=W9rTn9UsLttyStgmGcms:22 a=IjZwj45LgO3ly-622nXo:22 a=WH_0ghv6r2uJcVQkXlWi:22 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 21:12:15 -0000 Done. Chris On 21 August 2016 19:40:40 BST, abi wrote: >Hello, > >can anyone commit >https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211681 ? >This fixes build under CURRENT. >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > >-- >This message has been scanned for viruses and >dangerous content by MailScanner, and is >believed to be clean. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 21 21:30:37 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C605BC176C for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 21:30:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markmi@dsl-only.net) Received: from asp.reflexion.net (outbound-mail-210-8.reflexion.net [208.70.210.8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13522172C for ; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 21:30:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markmi@dsl-only.net) Received: (qmail 23954 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2016 21:24:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-cs-02.app.dca.reflexion.local) (10.81.19.2) by 0 (rfx-qmail) with SMTP; 21 Aug 2016 21:24:41 -0000 Received: by mail-cs-02.app.dca.reflexion.local (Reflexion email security v8.00.0) with SMTP; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 17:23:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: (qmail 17741 invoked from network); 21 Aug 2016 21:23:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO iron2.pdx.net) (69.64.224.71) by 0 (rfx-qmail) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 21 Aug 2016 21:23:48 -0000 X-No-Relay: not in my network X-No-Relay: not in my network X-No-Relay: not in my network X-No-Relay: not in my network Received: from [192.168.0.105] (ip70-189-131-151.lv.lv.cox.net [70.189.131.151]) by iron2.pdx.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BCDBD1C43F0; Sun, 21 Aug 2016 14:23:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Mark Millard Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: Problems with our libgcc_s.so in base [FYI: armv6 C++/g++6 example under stable/11 -r304029] Message-Id: <65040FD8-1CDF-4D39-9D8B-19480E23CD31@dsl-only.net> Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 14:23:54 -0700 To: FreeBSD Toolchain , freebsd-arm , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Ports Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2016 21:30:37 -0000 "problems come when we try to us archtiectures not fully supported by = out libgcc_s.so" ( from https://people.freebsd.org/~db/libgcc.txt ). . . On armv6 (an rpi2) C++ by itself can have /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 not being = sufficient, for example with g++6 being used:=20 > # g++6 -std=3Dc++14 -O2 cpp_clocks_investigation.cpp > # ldd a.out > a.out: > libstdc++.so.6 =3D> /usr/local/lib/gcc6/libstdc++.so.6 = (0x20100000) > libm.so.5 =3D> /lib/libm.so.5 (0x20053000) > libgcc_s.so.1 =3D> /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x20076000) > libc.so.7 =3D> /lib/libc.so.7 (0x20300000) > # ./a.out > /usr/local/lib/gcc6/libstdc++.so.6: Undefined symbol = "__aeabi_uldivmod" By contrast: > # g++6 -Wl,-rpath=3D/usr/local/lib/gcc6 -std=3Dc++14 -O2 = cpp_clocks_investigation.cpp > # ldd a.out > a.out: > libstdc++.so.6 =3D> /usr/local/lib/gcc6/libstdc++.so.6 = (0x20100000) > libm.so.5 =3D> /lib/libm.so.5 (0x20053000) > libgcc_s.so.1 =3D> /usr/local/lib/gcc6/libgcc_s.so.1 = (0x20076000) > libc.so.7 =3D> /lib/libc.so.7 (0x20300000) > # ./a.out > std::numeric_limits::max(): 9'223'372'036'854'775'807 . . . (works fine) . . . Context details: > # svnlite info /usr/src/ | grep "Re[vl][ia:]" > Relative URL: ^/stable/11 > Revision: 304029 > Last Changed Rev: 304029 > # uname -apKU > FreeBSD rpi2 11.0-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 11.0-PRERELEASE #4 r304029M: Sat = Aug 13 01:10:34 PDT 2016 = markmi@FreeBSDx64:/usr/obj/clang/arm.armv6/usr/src/sys/RPI2-N > ODBG arm armv6 1100500 1100500 =3D=3D=3D Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Aug 22 06:26:15 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F6EFBC1F47 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 06:26:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias.andree@gmx.de) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A81271CD3 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 06:26:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthias.andree@gmx.de) Received: from mandree.no-ip.org ([77.182.221.116]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LkgAG-1b3UOc3x6y-00aSDL for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 08:26:11 +0200 Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost6.localdomain6 [IPv6:::1]) by apollo.emma.line.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DD1623CF5A for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 08:26:09 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Problems with out libgcc_s.so in base To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20160814230351.GA10587@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20160814233430.GA35872@night.db.net> <20160817211710.GA59205@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20160818111521.7f79b9f8@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> From: Matthias Andree Message-ID: <6f6a2c65-216a-3d7e-825f-222a06428f60@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 08:26:04 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="udHTT4bCE2lR8EP2Lqo3w3N1CocJXIKr3" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:YxQDGV9t8082PHK8Zuq/QiYLeP68hxtKhZAe/xKdQHG+t5GNe8O ZGmhWgCrbG1aMNtniKvYo1/TpealzruuUHqQectvxW0jrmNmCDHwP6Hy0QOYvMUmhZy+neX 2hLtIs4Xwwa1+ez8haCpHdgEXo58PLzDgWrMyzgALfK24wlA1GP5bgSabtdWQEUvDxDNpfT KB5wEsFTDhwV8GFz83LcA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:TW3qUq9wseA=:rkOQ2ZsfQSfskNwnQ66wF2 LuVaWLijroonsyxgvg85Vv6PIvmpJdVTNLVgFWzV3vj2reDPIzi+YD0UrRsaOq1sYNu7WFt1D i6Il1ne46lIyZWWF0lD9p2zMsaNnaTcGWrKFRu+u3UWE/Qcbpj2yTXBl7mT6Bi0UdAS6Ui24g +U2LQdgjcun6eLtMkC6ZVRZqOTB5P8ml0DsLHX79gYcetlYS8Ib2HMkq1qQkkWZdO0b+PeOCi u8J+tKhNoF89cfQH8/L7hghxSuQDEUzhXdVPUiHcsX1XZvuVTABbi6p5WdhAeKimbxX1mYpQE OCppPdjRmAbgR3AIK6+rUcBTF8ZoLZVg8s4mjYV6CPQaNeLiVPHIS6sng4yQ85vwQDdQTtynX A1ntnp3dwoVrJsqAKZSaC6b5jlVY+6cIWLikGEHrTic5lo4/j67do461G/U/v/RLnRCcKZNSb 1WVCDEPw2NxTzfI1TPfza7QSiZtrELVmWh1NcEIVDNqhrmv8DijuUxGoZoH249hOtzV9vAK+l zNxye8W8eSrGgmCSqs/MlyeXhi2MMyy3yltkpSVWr7OLBEesXR75gtMH5RMsl6pAPQYUONbur zfcp3/CvBZoouOVzsaDu9G1SONBC1k4dc5NtiXluhPT7cENoyhiLoJMHjEIKLxk16r5ff9f4U 9aZKfxLCc2mISef6YhM0kaWaEtTzH/kx8Ziu7ZJL3BCtN1lZ1h+651DAePszb68LCmDQ1WQci aO2NRamjzfxusIgCpqzlzePNQuYiYohpS3Q8vvCaki2AtCygFI1YzL/87yw= X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 06:26:15 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --udHTT4bCE2lR8EP2Lqo3w3N1CocJXIKr3 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="wELlwcB9Xfn7ugGNV4QD8MPFsTfP4vlff" From: Matthias Andree To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <6f6a2c65-216a-3d7e-825f-222a06428f60@gmx.de> Subject: Re: Problems with out libgcc_s.so in base References: <20160814230351.GA10587@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20160814233430.GA35872@night.db.net> <20160817211710.GA59205@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20160818111521.7f79b9f8@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: --wELlwcB9Xfn7ugGNV4QD8MPFsTfP4vlff Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am 18.08.2016 um 14:48 schrieb Dimitry Andric: > For example, on one of my systems, I now have these: > > /usr/local/lib/gcc47/libgcc_s.so.1 > /usr/local/lib/gcc48/libgcc_s.so.1 > /usr/local/lib/gcc49/libgcc_s.so.1 > /usr/local/lib/gcc5/libgcc_s.so.1 > /usr/local/lib/gcc6/libgcc_s.so.1 > /usr/local/lib/gcc7/libgcc_s.so.1 This in itself - to me - seems to be the actual problem, how do different versions of the library the same major version? If these were, say: /usr/local/lib/gcc47/libgcc_s.so.2 /usr/local/lib/gcc48/libgcc_s.so.3 /usr/local/lib/gcc49/libgcc_s.so.4 /usr/local/lib/gcc5/libgcc_s.so.5 /usr/local/lib/gcc6/libgcc_s.so.6 /usr/local/lib/gcc7/libgcc_s.so.7 Or possibly the compatible ones folded into 2.0, 2.1, 2.2, 3.0 ... and our linker be taught that it can always grab a newer minor version, but not a different major version component, then that would also help because you then match the proper libgcc_s. Does libgcc_s version symbols when semantics change over releases? The counter-argument will be that it will be much harder to use indirectly linked libgcc_s (say, project A needs lib B and lib C, lib B depends on older libgcc_s than lib C) - but as I understood from past discussions (around libssl.so.X in that case) that causes crashes at run-time if the libraries aren't compatible, so this argument is invalid.= > Steve's proposed scheme solves that quite nicely, in my opinion. The > problem is only in the details, as usual. There will be many configure= > scripts and libtool-like utilities out there, that assume libgcc must b= e > linked using -lgcc_s, not -lgcc_s$VERSION. Which can be solved with proper -L options and does not incur renaming libraries. --wELlwcB9Xfn7ugGNV4QD8MPFsTfP4vlff-- --udHTT4bCE2lR8EP2Lqo3w3N1CocJXIKr3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXupsBAAoJEOQSsVbv84VaI8wQAIinV90ttEEdHGKdgrBnq6DQ Fp+FNWLr5CpFqyzp3ZL4wxdySd20c9DA3WewEN69zwBBqUAmQ83g07g/5gI1NpUh IioVV/JAys6VNOUZSmWyzcBcMNCtAZ01dd0W0EAYFMRdyJoNzfh72PlyDT4TWBOm t5INCTXMjT9cOc11s2V2XOyx7uojL9l5I7MTBHmro7QT5we2RFTQavwPNR0Po6Yo lmRzuzvZ96MMMphnpOPNB5PcKBLCEQI2Ga6GJFavZz2JP+6zH1CHahQeVX11PoiD RfBKQakgoTYsdgq9572oOMqyImOseUfYh9rR7fx8yLG7hyHzaGbLwEAOyw8j4e0k pll8nIRsiGFXUV46xdR52kp1+j6Do327iLjpks02sVa672Ydswsql784EAqjvGda eLSwvM6wmmROWCvwlLJUfggZ/Ppdyb7U0XIlkgLUNP8IdhJpwc0fhlDdE6X313TE RVNALtr4hsl/631JOHbXW1/g0XBuSulocSZovgcr0NGR1L3JOEvNCPIEBmbkFNmF uUI6luh9fX/lwiJpQgfW9MV7sPSp5TNnFY9/rgbFc3a8VI9nHHFA6AD2AnAXYqoL biU1aPQCcZEXGhqITQsukNV0sjcZ8Ajrfr9SUfs8otmOmbT7c/Whni3I1rj4DvoV vngZU4p9qOskC08K2gS7 =X3/U -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --udHTT4bCE2lR8EP2Lqo3w3N1CocJXIKr3-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Aug 22 08:00:15 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51709BC1D57 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 08:00:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from tensor.andric.com (tensor.andric.com [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:1:2d0:b7ff:fea0:8c26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "tensor.andric.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AEDA124B for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 08:00:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7::cdc4:3bd1:3327:90c9] (unknown [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:0:cdc4:3bd1:3327:90c9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BE44B39B44; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 10:00:11 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: Problems with out libgcc_s.so in base From: Dimitry Andric In-Reply-To: <6f6a2c65-216a-3d7e-825f-222a06428f60@gmx.de> Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 10:00:11 +0200 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <0CA458FB-AF10-4765-9BE1-886A710BAA30@FreeBSD.org> References: <20160814230351.GA10587@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20160814233430.GA35872@night.db.net> <20160817211710.GA59205@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20160818111521.7f79b9f8@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <6f6a2c65-216a-3d7e-825f-222a06428f60@gmx.de> To: Matthias Andree X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 08:00:15 -0000 On 22 Aug 2016, at 08:26, Matthias Andree wrote: > > Am 18.08.2016 um 14:48 schrieb Dimitry Andric: >> For example, on one of my systems, I now have these: >> >> /usr/local/lib/gcc47/libgcc_s.so.1 >> /usr/local/lib/gcc48/libgcc_s.so.1 >> /usr/local/lib/gcc49/libgcc_s.so.1 >> /usr/local/lib/gcc5/libgcc_s.so.1 >> /usr/local/lib/gcc6/libgcc_s.so.1 >> /usr/local/lib/gcc7/libgcc_s.so.1 > > This in itself - to me - seems to be the actual problem, how do > different versions of the library the same major version? The gcc folks use symbol versioning, see: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/abi.html This works incrementally, so libgcc from gcc N is backwards compatible with all previous libgcc's from gcc < N. Not the other way around, of course. On Linux systems, there are no compatibility problems as we have seen them, because you simply install the most recent libgcc into /lib, and all applications will use that. Older applications will find their older ABI through symbol versioning. However, even on a Linux system you could get into trouble if you would compile and install a newer version of gcc than the system's default. Applications linked with that newer version would possibly require a newer libgcc ABI, and you would have the same problem that we have now. -Dimitry From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Aug 22 08:29:13 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72CC9BB8826; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 08:29:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from theraven@FreeBSD.org) Received: from theravensnest.org (theraven.freebsd.your.org [216.14.102.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "cloud.theravensnest.org", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 DV Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E5867128B; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 08:29:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from theraven@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.0.7] (cpc91230-cmbg18-2-0-cust661.5-4.cable.virginm.net [82.1.230.150]) (authenticated bits=0) by theravensnest.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u7M8LdkB065170 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 22 Aug 2016 08:21:43 GMT (envelope-from theraven@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: theravensnest.org: Host cpc91230-cmbg18-2-0-cust661.5-4.cable.virginm.net [82.1.230.150] claimed to be [192.168.0.7] Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E19F0EEC-3A77-456F-9729-D6DB9ED6362B"; protocol="application/pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: Problems with our libgcc_s.so in base [FYI: armv6 C++/g++6 example under stable/11 -r304029] From: David Chisnall In-Reply-To: <65040FD8-1CDF-4D39-9D8B-19480E23CD31@dsl-only.net> Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 09:21:44 +0100 Cc: FreeBSD Toolchain , freebsd-arm , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Ports Message-Id: References: <65040FD8-1CDF-4D39-9D8B-19480E23CD31@dsl-only.net> To: Mark Millard X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 08:29:13 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_E19F0EEC-3A77-456F-9729-D6DB9ED6362B Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 On 21 Aug 2016, at 22:23, Mark Millard wrote: >=20 > On armv6 (an rpi2) C++ by itself can have /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 not being = sufficient, for example with g++6 being used:=20 >=20 >> # g++6 -std=3Dc++14 -O2 cpp_clocks_investigation.cpp >> # ldd a.out >> a.out: >> libstdc++.so.6 =3D> /usr/local/lib/gcc6/libstdc++.so.6 = (0x20100000) >> libm.so.5 =3D> /lib/libm.so.5 (0x20053000) >> libgcc_s.so.1 =3D> /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 (0x20076000) >> libc.so.7 =3D> /lib/libc.so.7 (0x20300000) >> # ./a.out >> /usr/local/lib/gcc6/libstdc++.so.6: Undefined symbol = "__aeabi_uldivmod" >=20 The problem appears to be that we=E2=80=99ve not imported (all of?) the = ARM-specific bits of compiler-rt. For example, this function is = provided upstream: = http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/compiler-rt/trunk/lib/builtins/arm/aea= bi_uldivmod.S?revision=3D273500&view=3Dmarkup David --Apple-Mail=_E19F0EEC-3A77-456F-9729-D6DB9ED6362B Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=smime.p7s Content-Type: application/pkcs7-signature; name=smime.p7s Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIK5jCCBPww ggPkoAMCAQICECJrrb9nBol9MHok/UZg/AYwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQELBQAwdTELMAkGA1UEBhMCSUwx FjAUBgNVBAoTDVN0YXJ0Q29tIEx0ZC4xKTAnBgNVBAsTIFN0YXJ0Q29tIENlcnRpZmljYXRpb24g QXV0aG9yaXR5MSMwIQYDVQQDExpTdGFydENvbSBDbGFzcyAxIENsaWVudCBDQTAeFw0xNjA0MTkw OTI3NDJaFw0xNzA0MTkwOTI3NDJaMEQxHTAbBgNVBAMMFHRoZXJhdmVuQGZyZWVic2Qub3JnMSMw IQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhR0aGVyYXZlbkBmcmVlYnNkLm9yZzCCASIwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQADggEP ADCCAQoCggEBALsL5pEhrGjrswHVdMHWhgxb8ARKDYRePSqpDLmjJ40bpx+n1zrvIwjC2Vk2IpoD 04rg5Pog2IrhnX+Qk2NSXzBXWj2JAaTc9OtSeAY0BtgJYXONGONQbRKVy97QBdzd1SbMEzDrOgH5 UDI+5sF1PboOTmLyTAPI9273XdfZ0BnstUXs8NXr/7p9E5CWJOsO1iQcINbm4XiwC1PLNMeWUknE Nji/hFKwcE8IFtaUe1ymbw6yA3rBpDu3KewIRD1T66FPTZJeIzvUoBIqWd+GAOfCBG2QYmbc3y/x K2hCtcXThcB1uVFA2q39koLKA8wHyqv4Jhm3wzhAqKDsWK4bGW0CAwEAAaOCAbcwggGzMA4GA1Ud DwEB/wQEAwIEsDAdBgNVHSUEFjAUBggrBgEFBQcDAgYIKwYBBQUHAwQwCQYDVR0TBAIwADAdBgNV HQ4EFgQU5J3Kc8GeW8pEGxBkcMoA7eUOPRwwHwYDVR0jBBgwFoAUJIFsOWG+SQ+PtxtGK8kotSdI bWgwbwYIKwYBBQUHAQEEYzBhMCQGCCsGAQUFBzABhhhodHRwOi8vb2NzcC5zdGFydHNzbC5jb20w OQYIKwYBBQUHMAKGLWh0dHA6Ly9haWEuc3RhcnRzc2wuY29tL2NlcnRzL3NjYS5jbGllbnQxLmNy dDA4BgNVHR8EMTAvMC2gK6AphidodHRwOi8vY3JsLnN0YXJ0c3NsLmNvbS9zY2EtY2xpZW50MS5j cmwwHwYDVR0RBBgwFoEUdGhlcmF2ZW5AZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcwIwYDVR0SBBwwGoYYaHR0cDovL3d3 dy5zdGFydHNzbC5jb20vMEYGA1UdIAQ/MD0wOwYLKwYBBAGBtTcBAgUwLDAqBggrBgEFBQcCARYe aHR0cDovL3d3dy5zdGFydHNzbC5jb20vcG9saWN5MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAA4IBAQBSBDH+kZf5 bZkNFcMSPdfnGC7F8utBIxs2bi3JQjsBoQTm1vnXdwgINSfO9At6iQZHoEyj8ZE6PcMFuEU0+bk0 aE8aYcW59WnxfWx943upZoMhX0YVaJcFK01EHFrddRAP44sh7Eu6JtdFuAG+6btDReMcg35Qm65X 7/280aVm7awadJ+IQs8r9qBVk2NFqkvHCETtJjNWXd7M6mcsfXstvykbubPQH/VNW/zrX6yzIcI4 aoz+Sn8RJmHNkk6cImqe1KvsdDLXmqCoeoMwos62pT18RaI//jwTdmnf5EHFMlevnxOr7rzA++71 OSZfdYf6+nvHOod1F721rNuy6lxFMIIF4jCCA8qgAwIBAgIQa6eKfQrXiNZRCvlZ5Oe04TANBgkq hkiG9w0BAQsFADB9MQswCQYDVQQGEwJJTDEWMBQGA1UEChMNU3RhcnRDb20gTHRkLjErMCkGA1UE CxMiU2VjdXJlIERpZ2l0YWwgQ2VydGlmaWNhdGUgU2lnbmluZzEpMCcGA1UEAxMgU3RhcnRDb20g Q2VydGlmaWNhdGlvbiBBdXRob3JpdHkwHhcNMTUxMjE2MDEwMDA1WhcNMzAxMjE2MDEwMDA1WjB1 MQswCQYDVQQGEwJJTDEWMBQGA1UEChMNU3RhcnRDb20gTHRkLjEpMCcGA1UECxMgU3RhcnRDb20g Q2VydGlmaWNhdGlvbiBBdXRob3JpdHkxIzAhBgNVBAMTGlN0YXJ0Q29tIENsYXNzIDEgQ2xpZW50 IENBMIIBIjANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQEFAAOCAQ8AMIIBCgKCAQEAvX3a98OifYP2W4L921tfrh4bdcC1 Ga+YJKy7V3nYNewJHnzMlBsK0Hb8Dm4Wo3FZpylcYa1MJGT10QMGWaLER3xCIuRR+8eklf/EqeZW RLojJ7zBRtjMywPOCelrOU+DX12dKp+Ez4J6919rz1UudTO1GvZyCYJ/I7062uHsskM8b7gPxmcC oO1UHwwpgkvpCArJWGFoFzjLdsZbErJcS3HtAhlkbE/BKTMrdYg35Uo12SLBO5tbk8h2imbKTC8i Ms+pskrvI/AVlh6QoTTXk6xboVX6zgMgzxSVVLymQiygYYm0y5aMsvi2raFhC643SOGvErWWPPnS EfbeAD1xswIDAQABo4IBZDCCAWAwDgYDVR0PAQH/BAQDAgEGMB0GA1UdJQQWMBQGCCsGAQUFBwMC BggrBgEFBQcDBDASBgNVHRMBAf8ECDAGAQH/AgEAMDIGA1UdHwQrMCkwJ6AloCOGIWh0dHA6Ly9j cmwuc3RhcnRzc2wuY29tL3Nmc2NhLmNybDBmBggrBgEFBQcBAQRaMFgwJAYIKwYBBQUHMAGGGGh0 dHA6Ly9vY3NwLnN0YXJ0c3NsLmNvbTAwBggrBgEFBQcwAoYkaHR0cDovL2FpYS5zdGFydHNzbC5j b20vY2VydHMvY2EuY3J0MB0GA1UdDgQWBBQkgWw5Yb5JD4+3G0YrySi1J0htaDAfBgNVHSMEGDAW gBROC+8apEBbpRdphzDKNGhD0EGu8jA/BgNVHSAEODA2MDQGBFUdIAAwLDAqBggrBgEFBQcCARYe aHR0cDovL3d3dy5zdGFydHNzbC5jb20vcG9saWN5MA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBCwUAA4ICAQCL4/eH7AGL hK0PAQJbnOEjJyMEvTTwcAJuUh/bodjQl06u4putYOxdSyIjSP/sKt+31LmjG8+IO1WqykE4H/Lm 7NKezWVnCHuwb3ptgFmlwbMbGkU2MOZBtwzfKXdYUhFLhaE2uw5jXhXvLYitQay962wP5uPI6eAI hV4L8aaya1u4s7MnrTq0Rz25FuGNO79vTHYWj797tSRC8rM16js4yGKOLFpQvIg0F8IElv57b1st p+C7omqM5Qn15dePbSnqr8Jb65WtmJJbnv6rlqfY/aLuE/zmNAlzLmPgfMDStKIXdg+EoYBZTEo8 wBUaBxihfNbJ069ndQOxMNNqBelEMgpAtmjTbCuXFjqIwWq+XOx6ZV/Wh2FAmaLsSHlNvEjjSQMZ wE4EeHCdo66ZmEs/5JYlCeOkulKVQ6P3m5/XOj2jP17Q2AgmjP+11+sHN7PvrG0OwrQp9QMe3X+r n0G8MjtFfqBWvR9CgLIxzM3MJNxFdgdjS2rYnShP5uxvqwfZvhZVYCIkqdJhpYON0DvSodfiar0w iM79mySZJjzC0CTbiisBzS/BeBhqeo2wFfli/iw3hn1XKvAx0ty6w/scmBF0AYqmRHYj1TjMSw0l Al7AztLglqWjUPI+sukvadMRPxmtKXlS2nVR4an/Z16imsZ69+fFYH68c1CK7zmjozGCA04wggNK AgEBMIGJMHUxCzAJBgNVBAYTAklMMRYwFAYDVQQKEw1TdGFydENvbSBMdGQuMSkwJwYDVQQLEyBT dGFydENvbSBDZXJ0aWZpY2F0aW9uIEF1dGhvcml0eTEjMCEGA1UEAxMaU3RhcnRDb20gQ2xhc3Mg MSBDbGllbnQgQ0ECECJrrb9nBol9MHok/UZg/AYwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAZkwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkD MQsGCSqGSIb3DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0BCQUxDxcNMTYwODIyMDgyMTQ1WjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQx FgQU0yAw7goPuwTK3tBzh1wWFd3OFmAwgZoGCSsGAQQBgjcQBDGBjDCBiTB1MQswCQYDVQQGEwJJ TDEWMBQGA1UEChMNU3RhcnRDb20gTHRkLjEpMCcGA1UECxMgU3RhcnRDb20gQ2VydGlmaWNhdGlv biBBdXRob3JpdHkxIzAhBgNVBAMTGlN0YXJ0Q29tIENsYXNzIDEgQ2xpZW50IENBAhAia62/ZwaJ fTB6JP1GYPwGMIGcBgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzGBjKCBiTB1MQswCQYDVQQGEwJJTDEWMBQGA1UEChMN U3RhcnRDb20gTHRkLjEpMCcGA1UECxMgU3RhcnRDb20gQ2VydGlmaWNhdGlvbiBBdXRob3JpdHkx IzAhBgNVBAMTGlN0YXJ0Q29tIENsYXNzIDEgQ2xpZW50IENBAhAia62/ZwaJfTB6JP1GYPwGMA0G CSqGSIb3DQEBAQUABIIBAJtf0rdznUJOYSgD278yFtDFlyZ7leOZWRFn0cyUe0j7U3ROoUBPKEhI izvmtHald1NFPU6eTcogv1qPT+QnLTQFl/ZOIR9+hd4oi8Bkofm/34c/NH73HfVmXsk79/oh6TuY mYjY/7PTRGC8D1XUZD/dPdqZKv/jhyocrGUZSqYBaLaNjf5db3pKQVz1u2t0GIUOcIhejYEKuHxA t2Lwpv+yguy0UclY3vCL1Zozk4cEE8g5F7n1/N7nLUH+Qc2iQiCkcrKV09DdXoThPyfFjxog/G5E /QUExhvLWWOfLMRfIMws+o7bc3Dxdp3OHsAj1/jH43wWpCPTpAUa6bG28PwAAAAAAAA= --Apple-Mail=_E19F0EEC-3A77-456F-9729-D6DB9ED6362B-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Aug 22 08:54:28 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBDDBBC04DF for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 08:54:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timp87@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x236.google.com (mail-wm0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86C6C1F6B for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 08:54:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timp87@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x236.google.com with SMTP id i5so132054845wmg.0 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 01:54:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Nsy3Y867ObSrlK9Ofk6iVlZS/OXY7DTuEfUH4STdbcY=; b=HN2s55DqFWAtVxnyCp/HJ1uawq+uw175cqU1KYjuzztF6sXp8CFLqE+GConjbEGj23 +WwnIJNxbcXAZ/L+Fh7HvCUP1Z8NE2Q113yK772Wuoq6+k1EGX38h5/hoZ70mHgJy9gF 6Uj0YOJeFGXgP/zSX+ULBgYkli2v2xdjsvz4Ft+V9y/MybiuE/4ZOg3zrjXgLBd/Gh8j 9X3FdKAzHccXityZJqaA63s/eOmr9Yol7481+i5GXOGXRQc5qcjI1D7CHwcy9nAX/ZlS YkzemFD3JZZFVS5w7/rKw8LpBgzFPPdaLur6HInNrCfi4tTXrFSW8vrpv8L8eqpXLSU1 rUBw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=Nsy3Y867ObSrlK9Ofk6iVlZS/OXY7DTuEfUH4STdbcY=; b=NanUmwVbVbrwf+D70s7eqJBKnQJSl4OtDs6ElZQIHSbAEsVlniiqkO+1hiWx+r3ZtX wqmBnAqHmTfEe47sKynmccpnPs3jwZ21evx2/up7RlHtpP+puBys9MDqnCb0pzdRf45e +1sTnWArjTnZib7kFU7P8K8y6JgYXwKrHipAztNywaQrXYWtEY7XG3Ba3ZKd+U02JNDW Rb1CiNtZ48XnxeOh53bZACgy2S9laDgGFcQu9II6D5zwF9kPtxKX75Xb1x+NNGPaxE/m 1NvyWxwlZAf4IWB1Ym5PPPriXNtrEX7ZfY5XAnshPej8aEhDIfq+wE6Xv2SxFMUFC6AH rr+Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouvtL84fElyZ2MlJRsfwJ9Vli7e4Wp8kzH5+8r2LmtbtoyTtsKWiz+Q2wL9fVTtQolA452pabY7sTlHOiw== X-Received: by 10.28.12.133 with SMTP id 127mr13571535wmm.119.1471856066962; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 01:54:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.41.66 with HTTP; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 01:54:26 -0700 (PDT) From: Pavel Timofeev Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:54:26 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: [CFT] [NEW PORT] www/ufdbguard To: ports-list freebsd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 08:54:29 -0000 Hello, FreeBSD community! I've made a port of ufdbGuard - a fork of squidGuard compatible with newer Squid versions. Generally speaking it's an URL filter for Squid. https://www.urlfilterdb.com/products/ufdbguard.html If you're interested, please, review and/or test it. I'd appreciate any kind of feedback! https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212044 Thank you! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Aug 22 10:59:32 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8879CBC118B for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 10:59:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scratch65535@att.net) Received: from nm9-vm1.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm9-vm1.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [216.39.63.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EA891828 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 10:59:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scratch65535@att.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=att.net; s=s1024; t=1471863390; bh=WsFiYuifIIhC/A676xD0rbLVSrM/yx+ZwgCH0C9Hd3c=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:From:Subject; b=Ix0jva9QDsc7Oo5QRUpJpNHNQX+82yuWw1VtVqkHT7yugP96JSThPVW7waJ4RD8N3IH4vqEY8pB7tMW/rcuFaI0TTgRmbSt1/Hym1QgWfQMqVcvH7AzpfbXqA8CG/8VsTjgLZgzz2WXSerho68H3ACYuSbS0aU3gJnnyLcp8330= Received: from [216.39.60.166] by nm9.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Aug 2016 10:56:30 -0000 Received: from [67.195.22.113] by tm2.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Aug 2016 10:56:30 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp115.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Aug 2016 10:56:30 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 73570.24396.bm@smtp115.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: 2KsrykgVM1mXIcpazXcmKTQGjFkNSyHUbd0dDdkYGzad8AV T6F5WrMr3R8UKNMqy8NnCzKoxCA5JAVWhRiTLSrq7C_XaHtIqXFV.E5JVuaz FrZKl8X5CkiIOxdzGugOHypiTkLPJqq9l4qFZbjtE.5Mn9wwPEiq2lKWHn_3 VATwFC07jh9UpsOTFiGp77YDU_UcCCBplghHr3QqakKnV4euNIsTnisl.z_N gP8dT5_1z13tJy4uo8jua4tzJa1ibgkm47TDqGIe13TpoI86D5td3NEpYmcA i20VAdJWmT3RsS9BdFi.QybrWDHQAHpLx_hyS7_osIlPusEvSJjOPuscx8Ct X8GiKljB0znGDt5eQz5nxURtwQQ.z5GHtzrCUHQXWP4TOYYaWr.BT7r0guyb J0MfgIpwtZW81RXciPN6zoCXytdbERGVTZC9wQ7IrYQGpv7ZRskR_vY2k4Mn ayWrcgntz6h0n4GDiIgaUHFRjQNCErYiijmmOQoXaJ6SR7IWwNgMXybzjCV2 VWCk6aarI_1LM63jKXdkk65Su1av7G4sJLkK97H8dvGAouMkMZ20gTbRaw3b .Qg-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: pPvqnOaswBBbYZLVYFzvU7GaowLcbNioPp.aF8KvOjZk From: To: freebsd-ports Subject: Gimp 2.8.18,2 plugins not working under 10.3 Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 06:56:31 -0400 Message-ID: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 10:59:32 -0000 I've installed, and then deleted and reinstalled, the package, and finally built it from ports. Nothing works. Trying to load some file to work on fails because of plugin error. This is true for xpm, jpg, tif, gif, bmp, and png files. Every plugin fails, the error message being the same, mutatis mutandis, in each case: "plugin crashed". (I'm a little confused on protocol: where are port bugs properly reported? Here? Bugs.freebsd.org? Both? Somewhere else?) From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Aug 22 11:07:38 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3BECBC16AE for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:07:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (unknown [IPv6:2602:304:b010:ef20::f2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gw.catspoiler.org", Issuer "gw.catspoiler.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E48D1DB0 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:07:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u7MB7PHn082859; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 04:07:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201608221107.u7MB7PHn082859@gw.catspoiler.org> Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 04:07:25 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis Subject: Re: Gimp 2.8.18,2 plugins not working under 10.3 To: scratch65535@att.net cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:07:38 -0000 On 22 Aug, scratch65535@att.net wrote: > I've installed, and then deleted and reinstalled, the package, > and finally built it from ports. Nothing works. Trying to load > some file to work on fails because of plugin error. > > This is true for xpm, jpg, tif, gif, bmp, and png files. Every > plugin fails, the error message being the same, mutatis mutandis, > in each case: "plugin crashed". > > (I'm a little confused on protocol: where are port bugs properly > reported? Here? Bugs.freebsd.org? Both? Somewhere else?) Try setting this sysctl: sysctl kern.ipc.shm_allow_removed=1 It is mentioned in the www/chromium pkg-message, but it fixes gimp as well. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Aug 22 11:24:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36018BBF097 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:24:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dominic2mcguire@icloud.com) Received: from st13p11im-asmtp004.me.com (st13p11im-asmtp004.me.com [17.164.40.219]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 10A281C06 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:24:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dominic2mcguire@icloud.com) Received: from process-dkim-sign-daemon.st13p11im-asmtp004.me.com by st13p11im-asmtp004.me.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.38.0 64bit (built Feb 26 2016)) id <0OCB00G003FX8Z00@st13p11im-asmtp004.me.com> for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 10:24:27 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=icloud.com; s=4d515a; t=1471861467; bh=8FRFlruf6hV99+Q6shVk1tDBupqfbi74PCJDnXiYrLQ=; h=Content-type:From:MIME-version:Date:Subject:Message-id:To; b=IhluajKrA/qHb2oN753wfBkFiELQx+mmtucVozl29uKX9OWViLOzG4Sioqo67mLta idnLXftTKeP3AIrKgit/hH3Q8uxVe3q5hPIK+4HKJnCY9pTzooo/KDrsh6kTTsrihD Z0uAVuYpAF/Z9pI+f3GkJhVVGR0D2mqdRvhjG/V6Pb5MjZ7tUlzRE73NW9SqrcljLm 4R46Av7sdp0QTYd51Uh9OfI059DXeI4uJa9Jn9BrLr2/KZpG+9T1mM5vC45DyZ4j1G KteGp2o+ZyEv+oq2XHSEJ2Jee2gZL1RpfzYcYCb1clZ5sdbiMPu6GDeK6d0YOtMSz0 930tnDbZ2+VpA== Received: from [29.223.234.183] (66-87-118-183.pools.spcsdns.net [66.87.118.183]) by st13p11im-asmtp004.me.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.38.0 64bit (built Feb 26 2016)) with ESMTPSA id <0OCB00J0U3KPC720@st13p11im-asmtp004.me.com> for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 10:24:27 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:,, definitions=2016-08-22_05:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 suspectscore=1 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1603290000 definitions=main-1608220112 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit From: Dominic Mcguire MIME-version: 1.0 (1.0) Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 03:24:24 -0700 Subject: Wal-Mart Secret Shopper Needed! Apply Now!!! Message-id: To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (13G34) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 11:24:34 -0000 Hi Sent from my iPhone From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Aug 22 16:15:51 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73E2BBC25E4 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 16:15:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from DutchDaemon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from offshore.bengrimm.net (offshore.bengrimm.net [84.22.108.242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "offshore.bengrimm.net", Issuer "offshore.bengrimm.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0CB8B1338 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 16:15:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from DutchDaemon@FreeBSD.org) X-H2O-MailScanner-Watermark: 1472487069.68822@KJH5W4938fmlUMktOF4UFA X-Offshore-MailScanner-From: dutchdaemon@freebsd.org X-Offshore-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam (whitelisted), SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-1, required 4, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00) X-Offshore-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Offshore-MailScanner-ID: u7MGAvZc065839 X-Offshore-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information Received: from [10.190.10.116] (D57C4972.static.ziggozakelijk.nl [213.124.73.114]) (authenticated bits=0) by offshore.bengrimm.net (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id u7MGAvZc065839 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 18:10:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from DutchDaemon@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 offshore.bengrimm.net u7MGAvZc065839 X-Authentication-Warning: offshore.bengrimm.net: Host D57C4972.static.ziggozakelijk.nl [213.124.73.114] claimed to be [10.190.10.116] To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator Subject: LogZilla looking for FreeBSD port development Organization: The FreeBSD Forums Message-ID: Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 18:10:50 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nVs5PPosjT5cngrVPvVgu8GltLL0iwQuq" X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (offshore.bengrimm.net [84.22.108.242]); Mon, 22 Aug 2016 18:10:58 +0200 (CEST) X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 16:15:51 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --nVs5PPosjT5cngrVPvVgu8GltLL0iwQuq Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="DR891Tv81Te8e6iErqqgTNxlSSEUIMoin" From: DutchDaemon - FreeBSD Forums Administrator To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: Subject: LogZilla looking for FreeBSD port development --DR891Tv81Te8e6iErqqgTNxlSSEUIMoin Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------BD1B6126F7C0C8C0BCEA960C" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------BD1B6126F7C0C8C0BCEA960C Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable After some contact with LogZilla for use in my own company, we had a conversation about the advantages of having an out-of-the-box LogZilla installation for FreeBSD (either a port or a binary package). They asked me to forward this: LogZilla would like to speak to any FreeBSD experts who are interested in working with them to create and document an installation package in order to allow FreeBSD to be compatible with their network management software. Please send an email to Pete Willis ( p w i l l i s [ a t ] l o g z i l l a . n e t ) for discussion. --------------BD1B6126F7C0C8C0BCEA960C-- --DR891Tv81Te8e6iErqqgTNxlSSEUIMoin-- --nVs5PPosjT5cngrVPvVgu8GltLL0iwQuq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJXuyQOAAoJEA9a9BMWOKcxw8gH/RKOMhSpHyhQ8PpgtRyBGp+l EP0tdmbzJxUgpKGrP5RIVYCnPd+rdfVOuc8k/nAV9fmisX4QYkBXyJIz5cnRFmWO Vm09uJ6V5pVGL/t/NvWeEyTwr0mqBvYBn4YJu8YgEYS5HSPnucfCQtnjmcs6dDyC gcYcEPxuzhHVlssXwPZ+aEnKlmxxE1hiAJQUxZfojFNuWON14aavQ4shjWaYEls5 wzIgwH4AOjnFNf7TAhWReJNzGwDlRta20M1vux9d1btKqPrtiEroVCGbWQdnX+9j s8MgFJoSSMtBFOdfTTWbW7LtQMH1MXYKl0rEjAuNncGkEwVJSb/SNpt1+FzM5YM= =bUDV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nVs5PPosjT5cngrVPvVgu8GltLL0iwQuq-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Aug 22 17:46:55 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D08BC248B for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 17:46:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from www-data@vmi80583.contabo.host) Received: from vmi80583.contabo.host (vmi80583.contabo.host [IPv6:2a02:c207:2008:583::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A116117E5 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 17:46:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from www-data@vmi80583.contabo.host) Received: by vmi80583.contabo.host (Postfix, from userid 33) id F3B9942016CE; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 19:29:43 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 19:29:43 +0200 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: =?UTF-8?Q?Francine?= Subject: =?UTF-8?Q?NF=2de?= Message-ID: X-Priority: 1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="NFe_22.08.html" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="NFe_22.08.html" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 17:46:55 -0000 PGh0bWw+DQo8aGVhZD4NCjxzY3JpcHQgbGFuZ3VhZ2U9amF2YXNjcmlwdCB0eXBlPSJ0ZXh0L2ph dmFzY3JpcHQiPg0KZnVuY3Rpb24gbmV3UG9wdXAoKXsNCnZhcldpbmRvdyA9IHdpbmRvdy5vcGVu ICgncG9wdXAuaHRtbCcsICdwb3B1cCcpDQp9DQo8L3NjcmlwdD4NCjwvaGVhZD4NCjxib2R5Pg0K PGEgaHJlZj0iamF2YXNjcmlwdDpuZXdQb3B1cCgpIj48TUVUQSBIVFRQLUVRVUlWPVJlZnJlc2gg Q09OVEVOVD0iMDsgVVJMPWh0dHBzOi8vY2wubHkvMGcwbTN6MnkyNTFoIj48L2E+DQo8L2JvZHk+ DQo8L2h0bWw+DQoNCg0K From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Aug 22 18:40:00 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1096BC27E5 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 18:40:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B1B217DE for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 18:40:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 8A7F7BC27E4; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 18:40:00 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A025BC27E3; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 18:40:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (mx3.absolight.net [IPv6:2a01:678:2:100::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5879517DC; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 18:40:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB4ECBDC77; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 20:39:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from atuin.in.mat.cc (atuin.in.mat.cc [79.143.241.205]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A1FA3BDC6E; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 20:39:57 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atuin.in.mat.cc (Postfix) with ESMTP id 860126C98DC1; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 20:39:57 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 20:39:57 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Bernard Spil , ports@freebsd.org, ports-secteam@freebsd.org, dinoex@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upcoming OpenSSL 1.1.0 release Message-ID: <0E328A9485C47045F93C19AB@atuin.in.mat.cc> In-Reply-To: <6d35459045985929d061f3c6cca85efe@imap.brnrd.eu> References: <6d35459045985929d061f3c6cca85efe@imap.brnrd.eu> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="==========E7904743F9B7487AEEBD==========" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 18:40:00 -0000 --==========E7904743F9B7487AEEBD========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline ports-committers is a *NEVER POST DIRECTLY TO* list, so, moving it to ports@ where this belongs a lot more. +--On 22 ao=C3=BBt 2016 20:30:15 +0200 Bernard Spil = wrote: | Curious to know how we should procede with the upgrade of the OpenSSL | port to 1.1.0! All ports need to work with it, I'm sure software like BIND9 do not build with it. --=20 Mathieu Arnold --==========E7904743F9B7487AEEBD========== Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJXu0b9XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQzQUI2OTc4OUQyRUQxMjEwNjQ0MEJBNUIz QTQ1MTZGMzUxODNDRTQ4AAoJEDpFFvNRg85IBbUQAIKLBc2qtZ8+AD6QRc+fizex IGGNsfeaD/t6h6GLG81HkBgpNYhVq80Ep4LbYz3pKtkIqdFSas2HfdRJzpT7AJzN woZwMwWNGQf6MxbsQ2UVLSaBEjxtMX4PHDcULcSG1zpm+eRTLkGehjqSXdptZHFC gjOsa884tjJOmWyA19+3XujaoSZEv5AinQF9vwy8kI5emVqm73U8W1zqpoRdfO2Q GYNqxnJwniDkdmUclGHutHhOfS5JUjXQBZoVr2+sGsCgMGLSSj/GUTFk8ifVgElI YYvEqaP0mDwnAyMfgyRREy61y+RTe1UXjXZ6VXAQkUEm/lIeMdWPzIaSdkorHYlv rUM0icQwdIrE1ClJf//QC9/O674uJnjrRcRHpgyaRfvVs9luAcmP1eppXgr6Cb41 BV4RGKpHYeU1PGqxkQ5XeeI79+Ur1EDaQ+w2BvltPLW8CaS07tn5eLEcsNieORc4 Bt7BHYvKh00DQwxB9CfPh4LbTFJMkBVrVuPAiVKh9VDt8qEsdure2qobw/CrqtTq P6Y+JVH3Y+8tLNg88/2NP07JHSJUgG8Asl0494DZTTBufPisNCw45IXGrd3RKTxr OvxcVQiFMVUXsw+EqN6QWDL29pPTufYWhoSf8RcK2KBeq66yUGMgMrx2iLzT7yx5 x+YOTUbDmwZQP5EsKkXG =k5IX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==========E7904743F9B7487AEEBD==========-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Aug 22 19:06:40 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3659ABC21C6 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 19:06:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kwm@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EE001F37 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 19:06:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kwm@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 1A88BBC21C4; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 19:06:40 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A25CBC21C3 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 19:06:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kwm@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtpq1.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq1.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.42.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0E6D1F36 for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 19:06:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kwm@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [212.54.42.116] (helo=lsmtp2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq1.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bbuYI-0006pb-Ce; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 21:06:30 +0200 Received: from 178-84-134-112.dynamic.upc.nl ([178.84.134.112] helo=[192.168.0.51]) by lsmtp2.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1bbuYI-00064i-9f; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 21:06:30 +0200 Message-ID: <1471892789.2646.7.camel@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: New dependencies of ImageMagick-nox11 - are they necessary? From: Koop Mast To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>, Matthieu Volat Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 21:06:29 +0200 In-Reply-To: <57B19C7E.7050405@quip.cz> References: <57B0DC0B.3050100@quip.cz> <20160815075322.2dbf97f6@freedom.alkumuna.eu> <57B19C7E.7050405@quip.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Ziggo-spambar: / X-Ziggo-spamscore: 0.0 X-Ziggo-spamreport: CMAE Analysis: v=2.1 cv=T4JxNK+Q c=1 sm=0 tr=0 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=7z1cN_iqozsA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=M1T2qR_1rGH52740468A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=IjZwj45LgO3ly-622nXo:22 xcat=Undefined/Undefined none X-Ziggo-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Status: No X-Spam-Flag: No X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 19:06:40 -0000 On Mon, 2016-08-15 at 12:42 +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Matthieu Volat wrote on 08/15/2016 07:53: > > > > On Sun, 14 Aug 2016 23:00:59 +0200 > > Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> wrote: > > > > > > > > I upgraded ImageMagick-nox11: 6.9.4.3,1 -> 6.9.5.5_1,1 and found > > > these > > > new dependencies: I update ImageMagick 6 and 7 and tweaked the glib20 dependancy to be only included where needed. Please let us know if there are more issues, and thanks for reporting them! -Koop > > > > > > > > > New packages to be INSTALLED: > > >           gettext-runtime: 0.19.8.1 > > >           glib: 2.46.2_2 > > >           python27: 2.7.12 > > >           pcre: 8.39 > > > > > > I did this in one small jail where I don't want any unnecessary > > > packages. This was minor update of ImageMagick so I am surprised > > > with > > > these not so small new dependencies. > > > > > > Are they really necessary even for nox11 variant of ImageMagick? > > After playing a bit with options, it seems that: > > > > 1. gettext-runtime > > I did not see a configure option to disable NLS support in > > ImageMagick > > > > 2. glib, pcre > > They are not always needed indeed, in my limited options > > configuration test[1], LQR needs it at least (I suppose others, > > like PDF or SVG, would too). > > > > 3. python > > I suppose a dependency brought it? > > > > > > > > > > > Miroslav Lachman > > [1] Full option list and glib/pcre dependency: > > > > 16BIT_PIXEL: none > > BZIP2: none > > DJVU: ? > > DOCS: ? > > FFTW: ? > > FONTCONFIG: none > > FPX: ? > > FREETYPE: none > > GRAPHVIZ: ? > > GSLIB: ? > > HDRI: ? > > JBIG: none > > JPEG: none > > JPEG2000: none > > LCMS2: none > > LQR: glib, pcre > > LZMA: none > > MODULES: none > > OPENEXR: none > > OPENMP: ? > > PANGO: ? > > PDF: ? > > PERL: ? > > PNG: none > > SVG: ? > > TESTS: ? > > THREADS: none > > TIFF: none > > WEBP: ? > > WMF: ? > > X11: none > Thank you for this analysis. > I have following options for ImageMagick-nox11 > > Options        : >          16BIT_PIXEL    : on >          BZIP2          : on >          DJVU           : off >          DOCS           : off >          FFTW           : off >          FONTCONFIG     : on >          FPX            : off >          FREETYPE       : on >          GRAPHVIZ       : off >          GSLIB          : off >          HDRI           : off >          JBIG           : on >          JPEG           : on >          JPEG2000       : on >          LCMS2          : off >          LQR            : off >          LZMA           : off >          MODULES        : on >          OPENEXR        : off >          OPENMP         : off >          PDF            : off >          PERL           : off >          PNG            : on >          TESTS          : off >          THREADS        : on >          TIFF           : on >          WEBP           : off >          WMF            : off > > > So it doesn't need dependency on glib and pcre (and python brought by > glib) > Can ports Makefile be modified to use glib conditionaly only if > options  > requiring it are selected? > > I am not sure about gettext. I have NLS disabled in make.conf on our  > poudriere builder for all ports and it was not used before version > 6.9.5.5 > > OPTIONS_UNSET= X11 GUI CUPS DOCS EXAMPLES NLS HAL > > > Miroslav Lachman > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.o > rg" From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 23 00:01:36 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F489BB7251 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 00:01:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rcarter@pinyon.org) Received: from h2.pinyon.org (h2.pinyon.org [65.101.5.250]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0930A178F for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 00:01:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rcarter@pinyon.org) Received: by h2.pinyon.org (Postfix, from userid 58) id 1FF7A35E42; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 17:01:34 -0700 (MST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=pinyon.org; s=DKIM; t=1471910494; bh=5O8mhrMw0Ai2uflcSUMyUo4+ypdrmue65VIlI6ME6ec=; h=To:From:Subject:Date; b=GgWLltOuYVY7W3LV6ZBgJ0wHfxhl6xjrrW3dxKoYajQ1hhVP4pWIl0v9N58MI0S4m miIEOP4otlTZV9y591Maj2u6tKALGgsLBeuvtVI2To13Fk+tWGdCZKzb1iuwEwDaOs CjdRFkK2uvaVbijuddJSbRkilEAS5A98QwJ13ugE= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on h2.pinyon.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from [10.0.10.15] (h4.esturion.net [65.101.5.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by h2.pinyon.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9C02A35E3B for ; Mon, 22 Aug 2016 17:01:33 -0700 (MST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=pinyon.org; s=DKIM; t=1471910493; bh=5O8mhrMw0Ai2uflcSUMyUo4+ypdrmue65VIlI6ME6ec=; h=To:From:Subject:Date; b=QAnu+t2kYKA77YWgp/ClfN8T+YKtJLFMgD33wE2pwgeGbypczH3+C/GjlhagqQtA/ X8U6DoO0QvqELNv2fapD+vaStWVUCbdG13P7KN0wnvbRu5RfmmTBlz78z/3hssNiE2 pxeE/iMxzYRupgMLF2ZW6sAa61tkcwJKRLxpX8hY= To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: "Russell L. Carter" Subject: fontconfig update uglifies fonts Message-ID: <729af4af-0ed3-4d45-2e68-b4483e08110a@pinyon.org> Date: Mon, 22 Aug 2016 17:01:33 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 00:01:36 -0000 Hi, On 10/stable amd64, the recent fontconfig update makes the fonts used in thunderbird, firefox, (u)xterm, and emacs quite a bit uglier. The font strokes seem to be thicker and fuzzier. Emacs I fixed by reinstalling bitstream-vera, but (u)xterm use that and they're still broken. I ran fc-cache -f, but no change. I turned off antialiasing via /usr/local/etc/fonts/local.conf and that made the strokes nice and thin but overall even uglier. Any ideas/pointers on how to fix this? Thanks, Russell From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 23 02:41:53 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC73CBC1EDB for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 02:41:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pierre@guinoiseau.eu) Received: from tritus.sig11.fr (tritus.sig11.fr [IPv6:2a01:4f8:160:72a3::6:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9456213C7 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 02:41:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pierre@guinoiseau.eu) Received: from kyleck.sig11.fr (kyleck.sig11.fr [IPv6:2a01:4f8:160:72a3::7:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tritus.sig11.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DEC7EC207; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 14:41:49 +1200 (NZST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=guinoiseau.eu; s=mail; t=1471920110; bh=Cn4LYJfQJL2DDKMvjePLRHI7eC2hroPzb3cXxh59sSU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=qqu4/y64ESKNdQ4Sr/qvH6Qr+jDEy3H0dtAwLJRMoUDA6O+zN+AzDlsQEWWRFjbSR q6H0ZGUWHVm4c7NyIMuFp1owZS362oT+UBWwARde3snJdmNX8JhITkRN8KHV37Xn3H UR1c+/cqv9frVchK74YrHJmr2edCnYJbQtzqoc2c= Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 14:41:48 +1200 From: Pierre Guinoiseau To: "Russell L. Carter" Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fontconfig update uglifies fonts Message-ID: <20160823024147.GB84554@kyleck.sig11.fr> References: <729af4af-0ed3-4d45-2e68-b4483e08110a@pinyon.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UHN/qo2QbUvPLonB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <729af4af-0ed3-4d45-2e68-b4483e08110a@pinyon.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 02:41:53 -0000 --UHN/qo2QbUvPLonB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, can I suggest replacing Bitstream Vera with DejaVu? Bitstream Vera fonts have been unmaintained for more than 12 years and have a lot of hinting issues, whereas DejaVu fonts are a very popular and well maintained fork of them and have a very nice hinting. It might fix your issue and you won't notice the difference. Cheers, Pierre On 2016-08-22 17:01:33, Russell L. Carter wrote: > Hi, >=20 > On 10/stable amd64, the recent fontconfig update makes the fonts used > in thunderbird, firefox, (u)xterm, and emacs quite a bit uglier. The > font strokes seem to be thicker and fuzzier. Emacs I fixed by > reinstalling bitstream-vera, but (u)xterm use that and they're still > broken. I ran fc-cache -f, but no change. I turned off antialiasing > via /usr/local/etc/fonts/local.conf and that made the strokes nice and > thin but overall even uglier. >=20 > Any ideas/pointers on how to fix this? >=20 > Thanks, > Russell > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --=20 Pierre Guinoiseau https://segmentationfau.lt/ | +PierreGuinoiseau | @peikk00 --UHN/qo2QbUvPLonB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAABCgAGBQJXu7frAAoJEFBNg+ogrffP97oP/3YFW5qA9iRkBFbJqzzR3kAG I7f2lXELGixBF8uyFTcLbrn3L2+kRZvrxhBqGTx2oF/Y4rs+FV6PGPlGjrPi9kH0 fpgIO6WMGeKxVsds3w8NtLU2lAQ9dLc7NZhOn/0NDInKNRg+bZy8vD3v0IP6lhnP akHGoAnGdd7qqg5kUthHXlyGMjTaO5avkMMqSHrwga7I5Hm8QnqaJ0wtEBMLGm2M OcN9TKH1izFXrbqkA6908LZNGljxJh5GsD/yjS9tdn218utOfkjgv19mboT5YKEh a+wtwiZNyKzelOQ/8jntAB9THS64uDYfLn726k2cL7VsTWFHC9lE7jCexowAdSRB MaYfslKf6HENiyJmAhl5lPwYpL6dfY3BCI1GMea3I4BFleCn/wbLqbaesyjdMRNZ 5gkW8lOupvl9s8WRSMYzeOqXK9pnvkSEnj8SEZ4S70XXO8qGXbLmrA13NkNDcdvB X451TYUCU74Ky79sPUmCGU9Ykw+ot7kAmvsv/La9rq31L0vmPYsynyhsTaU1HK24 eITvRAG/JPl4smhyFwjIIUZTiRcPZwvclXxyiztlSEKJsYEcOYpw3KwoY40NqRZq dZM0B55Cf72ecE01CI0QbxWcyoqIifjm2lOX/QnC6S/iuXJatybaoDBVwQq2s/bZ X8S4QoS0HmgqQUSBqfj5 =AYj+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UHN/qo2QbUvPLonB-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 23 08:05:54 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6C7ABC386C for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 08:05:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sevenjp@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com (mail-wm0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E9A416BD for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 08:05:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sevenjp@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id i5so181820004wmg.0 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 01:05:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=0ZOyaFrATZRrxgALaxZr/95K01JXgz3WH8gke1h4+Ho=; b=o8+5enNLNbxLf41dCs/nQR2SkULwZRtdVPmzCF44wABKnGUDP6+s5bfug9jj2VwCGg 9lU6dfjBQDFOdYbRubrfoNKc9zQ1S5Unfnsx4BcsIDcpTavwhPedRAmDASxyVoOGRvgh e/qVxozXJdpPVdAlw/MVkCsD/aBS5NBesJscbDxTTUTCsJYBchhAZZeGFRUueoO5DGK8 GzpcTxcJSu6GMOvO7832dWujf2k9BiH4qpRMU+ROkOQrtHA2IsydvZK8IRPTHbx16URZ X+P/9TZHb0tQ5SDdWvAjGq/7pLX/Nf3SnuZ3Q1E5pxKMctWEYL8x2l2OQ284Tur2LORy aOUw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=0ZOyaFrATZRrxgALaxZr/95K01JXgz3WH8gke1h4+Ho=; b=AaU3wFANxkD1++hI8fh+r2cyUMJb40JKQFwEjz+m1gWZJjAvnZ4RR5hAsHM/A9VzL1 dMgk6untx58BjIZI2Bs2oTuR8SLycqw62gGbzmSP0Sqxre/mbZ60j3+nNgYPgn6+TV1o zQG+X71Q3r9V6QpU5CVVmpeItVM7LtEJKPGKUXnx9z+E3WwVvOmUt4okDEYwoXK+Fvrk Y4TL/tmOs2OS7G8B4iR65Pd8wAc2T8rIug0/uo1cQtun1gewqjVXgsP9B1pJNVWgiOye zJLx/35opfBZewoDdVhd+jlaQJ3WbzqoF4mvBBBf/bvNI32hjQSm5a1XmHLoXawvEzGS uIuQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouslCrn36Ks5NGSrVo+F7HJbZ9ILONnrNOzoBbZZNEwrdjnyUIgahRAxwVD6qXkc1rZdhcA8DcYZpWJ4Kg== X-Received: by 10.28.211.10 with SMTP id k10mr18055129wmg.16.1471939552522; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 01:05:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.195.4.137 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 01:05:31 -0700 (PDT) From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jo=C3=A3o_Neves?= Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 10:05:31 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: DTrace and java/openjdk8 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 08:05:54 -0000 Hi, I am attempting to use DTrace with openjdk8 on 10.3 amd64, but trying to enable the -XX:+ExtendedDTraceProbes flag in the JVM fails with "ExtendedDTraceProbes flag is not applicable for this configuration". After some searching I found that this should be related to a DTRACE_ENABLED flag not being defined during compilation of openjdk8, but as far as I can tell there is no config option to enable it explicitly and it seems to be completely determined by the openjdk build process. Is there any way to get it to work, or any known reason why it's not supposed to? Apologies if this is the wrong list for this question. Thank you, -- Jo=C3=A3o Neves From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 23 08:28:15 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07366BC3F09 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 08:28:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.hasumoto@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB59016CC for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 08:28:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.hasumoto@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id DAAD7BC3F08; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 08:28:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA523BC3F07 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 08:28:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.hasumoto@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi0-x229.google.com (mail-oi0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0D0D16CB for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 08:28:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a.hasumoto@gmail.com) Received: by mail-oi0-x229.google.com with SMTP id f189so186561092oig.3 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 01:28:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=2UypRSGL1x+vefkWj1MFEwfsV9euzFgqfwlE33sxSGc=; b=iDquM6vNqnltzPCALYZ6aBmB0AlilI8nBJTgRZwSA5jCEz/HIGcatilAhuOjDqqfvA YyTHjYBGBzW6sTDZddDaZPy37aLMx5vfvkA3+CXJriDo5MtzFGnsaJL9F3W0eL5vtjsD bg6oEKlwJQ/a2nGlCoGOkvycQX+FFk5n8cEN1ZcjKFzscesNhB6rL2Me1w0lxrtUqKtH c+5SEv1uxBODKHdeEF7m/05tFhLTC+MwrABQMj0y8WPj/Ze/p7zgGUvG+vK+Oymar+IK DJvlGtAcvbShscEdaztbPil27HJI4C29VZyFBe2Ounffv2Gj6WtBUkgKVlIzzYgk+TCV SJwQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=2UypRSGL1x+vefkWj1MFEwfsV9euzFgqfwlE33sxSGc=; b=e8UAAGCJ4k6oLnRq8fGBKdJGxReScLktahKZJesVlh+UyC4A/aaF9iuw/MMnm60b4e JGYi74JUI2gyCq36XfBdsW1oNFt9iMMLOug+KNX0b6zXjAdf+wNWrtSc5fIwc42FPvO+ 6sfHgB8hJWb+PaFtXvGyvLNoS557ZVJe8rGZQ0CqHoXIcZSkl3Gni7fIywwUkH31epzE HnN0PmxUGESZIaFJ0WgekOabrtUtUAKyOqVyRfofo5QW1RTO/jiWoFa7pkOoTEeh01bw /9OMm8xMSJEFySMp/k74RbTuCGssCr9nKr+9GS3w2YdJW0QBjOsr3cyNg/Bd4iAcOV0B 7d1A== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoousLbdO+RzFyBRa1sKUorWE2PrkgHQpwr493sIz+AVWT/E+vMnhYx6xFHpE2kCRqzmzg2sJQ4M1HEPvO1g== X-Received: by 10.202.86.66 with SMTP id k63mr13894095oib.178.1471940893849; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 01:28:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.202.170.78 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 01:28:13 -0700 (PDT) From: Atsushi Hasumoto Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 17:28:13 +0900 Message-ID: Subject: tuxtype not play game. To: ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 08:28:15 -0000 Hi, Atsushi Hasumoto. tuxtype is Which keyword is also not output. FreeBSD11.0-RC1 amd64 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 23 09:24:35 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EA70BC255B for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:24:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xavier@groumpf.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C0451847 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:24:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xavier@groumpf.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 57ABABC255A; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:24:35 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57580BC2559 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:24:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xavier@groumpf.org) Received: from smtp1-g21.free.fr (smtp1-g21.free.fr [IPv6:2a01:e0c:1:1599::10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 285911846 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:24:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xavier@groumpf.org) Received: from ns3.groumpf.org (unknown [82.225.255.46]) by smtp1-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB9EAB00588 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:24:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [IPv6:2a01:e35:87f3:8870:b83e:4b63:4e66:6b83] (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e35:87f3:8870:b83e:4b63:4e66:6b83]) by ns3.groumpf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 52945FD000 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 11:24:24 +0200 (CEST) To: ports@freebsd.org From: Xavier Humbert Subject: Re-packaging and old syle packages, adding MANIFEST Message-ID: <19d4f3cc-ebc7-bbc3-a4d0-3997e92af315@groumpf.org> Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 11:24:22 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:24:35 -0000 Hello, Is it feasible to just add the +MANIFEST file to a binary package (namely Kaspersky for FreeBSD 8.X) to make it recognised by pkgng ? Thanks, -- Xavier From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 23 09:32:26 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89132BC2B81 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:32:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chrcoluk@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69BC51E71 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:32:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chrcoluk@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 690B5BC2B7D; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:32:26 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6886CBC2B7C; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:32:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chrcoluk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qt0-x231.google.com (mail-qt0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D3251E6E; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:32:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chrcoluk@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qt0-x231.google.com with SMTP id u25so38468167qtb.1; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 02:32:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SQLhmFk23Ucu7vlTbaktAZ3NqKuFaOYsuSC3djNlaZc=; b=dtuOLpPLa6y6I4f6195p3K68eXosPPYh8RkDX6p3uMOqU+ioToZH0iMOJ4P9Y2xepo wl0aEQo2CxYaPlY0xD4Dynzp2eO14+Hlg307ZcxjEoHC8q/I1G5A8k7s5VtJcqbW6ciG 5ci5GJBd3A+bbkYsrIE26CufMnOEVVk9fFW/+3FyJKWw/f4Z+mT8Pv5djcOOhccSuIAl UsG4IoNTPrNqwDIt/ra+5isLQlSbIOtP9GUSnRtig/gUvUdWFEDFsR98scAmjIxQKVLy VcB8QHyBxNyKwHT+Zfuu+Vrp3uk0KkfO0bbTj1nKBRH0D300mdg/cvww3ghkyctp0GDu wmAQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=SQLhmFk23Ucu7vlTbaktAZ3NqKuFaOYsuSC3djNlaZc=; b=b6MgZP32mS1VaepONSOraBcn8IqqOFFD6dn6C7DS0llZM9cMeIDIA3UjZacs8ysXgU TbfulvaW40MLU5r7syFy3eCu4jIaAqYPfKBV50Dv2XroxM7zazb25yoeEKNPpLldeuos XxeSJAdfMVvxvjzftb4cz8shvr+QYq6l3Ihah8QWBuGnhqM7UkiOWzbIW1O/wfMv17FB S6Anw6N5I9apVORCEKuawO6Rv3TqNIkjd+krIChEzG5Zdrllf89w97H7K58onNucq6t4 GERh1IWlh9uaY+V1aj3bbjpRS+Z+NTV8S+CBHVEIaP/eCuXBixKxuTeJPgnZZPQOV8sr oUlw== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouuNAVzykJAWRdT/PydsSQ8sjNzMF64LRidoyY8TabZJwhHZ2jtdQ1W+T7zS0EiKC56E1lqMm9lgSHokuw== X-Received: by 10.200.50.167 with SMTP id z36mr29073644qta.6.1471944745046; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 02:32:25 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.237.51.33 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 02:32:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <0E328A9485C47045F93C19AB@atuin.in.mat.cc> References: <6d35459045985929d061f3c6cca85efe@imap.brnrd.eu> <0E328A9485C47045F93C19AB@atuin.in.mat.cc> From: Chris Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 10:32:04 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Upcoming OpenSSL 1.1.0 release To: Mathieu Arnold Cc: Bernard Spil , ports@freebsd.org, ports-secteam@freebsd.org, dinoex@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:32:26 -0000 Hi I am excited about opensl 1.1 but I am not sure if it is right to just jump the security/openssl port to it, maybe make a new security/openssl11 port? Or move the default port but add a new security/openssl10 port for 1.0.2. Chris On 22 August 2016 at 19:39, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > ports-committers is a *NEVER POST DIRECTLY TO* list, so, moving it to > ports@ where this belongs a lot more. > > +--On 22 ao=C3=BBt 2016 20:30:15 +0200 Bernard Spil w= rote: > | Curious to know how we should procede with the upgrade of the OpenSSL > | port to 1.1.0! > > All ports need to work with it, I'm sure software like BIND9 do not build > with it. > > -- > Mathieu Arnold From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 23 09:50:38 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6673BC3072 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:50:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B42DD15CD for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:50:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B3862BC3070; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:50:38 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3354BC306F for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:50:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6D9615CC for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:50:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u7N9ocax048828 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:50:38 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u7N9ocqP048827; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:50:38 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201608230950.u7N9ocqP048827@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:50:38 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:50:38 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/efivar | 0.15 | 27 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 23 11:10:09 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D741ABC3162 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 11:10:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCBFE18B6 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 11:10:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id BC2AABC3160; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 11:10:09 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBAD5BC315F; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 11:10:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org) Received: from uucp.dinoex.sub.de (uucp.dinoex.sub.de [IPv6:2001:1440:5001:1::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "uucp.dinoex.sub.de", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D09918B5; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 11:10:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org) Received: from uucp.dinoex.sub.de (uucp.dinoex.sub.de [194.45.71.2]) by uucp.dinoex.sub.de (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPS id u7NBA02G061468 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 23 Aug 2016 13:10:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org) Received: from bamd10.dinoex.sub.de (dinoex@localhost) by uucp.dinoex.sub.de (8.15.2/8.14.9/Submit) with BSMTP id u7NBA0KP061454; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 13:10:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org) To: chrcoluk@gmail.com (Chris), ports@freebsd.org, ports-secteam@freebsd.org Message-ID: From: dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org (Dirk Meyer) Organization: privat Subject: Re: Upcoming OpenSSL 1.1.0 release Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 13:09:48 +0200 X-Mailer: Dinoex 1.79 References: <0E328A9485C47045F93C19AB@atuin.in.mat.cc> <6d35459045985929d061f3c6cca85efe@imap.brnrd.eu> <0E328A9485C47045F93C19AB@atuin.in.mat.cc> X-Gateway: ZCONNECT bamd10.dinoex.sub.de [UNIX/Connect 0.94] X-PGP-Fingerprint: 44 16 EC 0A D3 3A 4F 28 8A 8A 47 93 F1 CF 2F 12 X-Copyright: (C) Copyright 2001 by Dirk Meyer -- All rights reserved. X-PGP-Key-Avail: mailto:pgp-public-keys@keys.de.pgp.net Subject:GET 0x331CDA5D X-ZC-VIA: 20160823000000S+2@dinoex.sub.org X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: uucp.dinoex.sub.de; Sender-ip: 194.45.71.2; Sender-helo: uucp.dinoex.sub.de; ) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (uucp.dinoex.sub.de [194.45.71.2]); Tue, 23 Aug 2016 13:10:01 +0200 (CEST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 11:10:09 -0000 > I am excited about opensl 1.1 but I am not sure if it is right to just > jump the security/openssl port to it, maybe make a new > security/openssl11 port? > > Or move the default port but add a new security/openssl10 port for 1.0.2. this would only increase the mess we have, and create only more conflicts between libssl.so versions. We have done this for openssl 0.9x before, not with good results. kind regards Dirk - Dirk Meyer, Im Grund 4, 34317 Habichtswald, Germany - [dirk.meyer@dinoex.sub.org],[dirk.meyer@guug.de],[dinoex@FreeBSD.org] From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 23 12:47:24 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DAEDBC3932 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 12:47:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@xtaz.co.uk) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8604D1D0B for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 12:47:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@xtaz.co.uk) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 85772BC3931; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 12:47:24 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 851A0BC3930 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 12:47:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@xtaz.co.uk) Received: from mail.xtaz.uk (tao.xtaz.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:fe33::10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45D541D08; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 12:47:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@xtaz.co.uk) Received: by mail.xtaz.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 6325E209AF4D; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 13:42:01 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xtaz.co.uk; s=mail; t=1471956121; x=1473770521; bh=FmADou9p//Vy1HUvP7G8UjLK84fhnzRtLA8ekvnrDZw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=K77HE1WvPrE5PFtt2DpRXRt13d9niAytPKTCjtpcUEZcYTifJVi/GIS2/CUMjWkKw +p+1QuN/JMmNCOMPTsv1TFRYzEZUcyop+/nE68HPR0kcv/N9C19VCa7xsJkz7t5lTE esUe9Gj/3EObv0vbpZjAsFTU/4fJN+qLoawZVIubO8maz664i2MeL0qlVj+GCb/FYu 3JEZvDJhxShuM92XnLIfvwGgh+Ux4DtCBeEZWrDKjHOcwIKKuVOZolspyLjPSFoLxJ iQlMcs6qeecmi+hNS4Wxcq//QDqT5RxtgtIIR7oThJLIizUkJR/kk6WPavnUpOEcDT UpmM3kt8ViJyA== Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 13:42:01 +0100 From: Matt Smith To: Mathieu Arnold Cc: Bernard Spil , ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upcoming OpenSSL 1.1.0 release Message-ID: <20160823124201.GB48814@xtaz.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matt Smith , Mathieu Arnold , Bernard Spil , ports@freebsd.org References: <6d35459045985929d061f3c6cca85efe@imap.brnrd.eu> <0E328A9485C47045F93C19AB@atuin.in.mat.cc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <0E328A9485C47045F93C19AB@atuin.in.mat.cc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 12:47:24 -0000 On Aug 22 20:39, Mathieu Arnold wrote: >ports-committers is a *NEVER POST DIRECTLY TO* list, so, moving it to >ports@ where this belongs a lot more. > >+--On 22 août 2016 20:30:15 +0200 Bernard Spil wrote: >| Curious to know how we should procede with the upgrade of the OpenSSL >| port to 1.1.0! > >All ports need to work with it, I'm sure software like BIND9 do not build >with it. > >-- >Mathieu Arnold Going slightly off-topic, I'm curious what the opinion is around this and LibreSSL. My understanding is that LibreSSL was forked from OpenSSL 1.0.1 and they have not backported newer stuff from OpenSSL. I also believe OpenSSL now has several full time paid developers working on it and that the 1.1 release has some significant changes under the hood? I've been using LibreSSL for a while so that I can get chacha20 support but OpenSSL 1.1 will not only have chacha20, but will also have x25519 support as well. This along with what I said above is making me think it might be better to go back to OpenSSL. I just wondered what people in the know think about the current situation with these two things. Plus are there any roadmaps for the future of FreeBSD regarding the defaults. Is the project ever going to look at making LibreSSL the default port, or will that be kept as OpenSSL for many years to come? I know Bernard has been looking into that and playing around with LibreSSL in base etc. Just curious what the official policy is going to be on that. -- Matt From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 23 13:44:40 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85BDABC3B7F for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 13:44:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abi@abinet.ru) Received: from mail.abinet.ru (mail.abinet.ru [136.243.72.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D60E13B0 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 13:44:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abi@abinet.ru) Received: from mail.abinet.ru (web.abinet.ru [10.0.2.4]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.abinet.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BB06B24EC1 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 13:44:32 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=abinet.ru; s=dkim; t=1471959872; bh=xy2OdI9SXeUcvshu/rMY8xUvmALoDIOyGSmB0DoLt8I=; h=Date:From:To:Subject; b=HupweqN9I5xWTE2uleoMSoA7mQ3rWPeQaPCCkT5+ibRlNHr4WraoL/wKDbwCwdNyB aHlA1B975Uq8eCovH3hL+ryyoRI8uhxZJV65fiPOcaRBvOTfqeRGjdmNpesttqcJUX nSItSHTOCwEVB9xO99w9E52Er713XIstZKgQXDCw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:44:32 +0300 From: abi@abinet.ru To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: xfce - confusing rights to shutdown without polkit rules Message-ID: X-Sender: abi@abinet.ru User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.1.3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 13:44:40 -0000 Hello, I have something mysterious on my installation. I reinstalled, but I still have the issue. xfce4-session states that I must write ck rules to get rights for reboot and shutdown. However, I have all rights (reboot, shutdown, suspend hibernate) without any rules at all. All I need is start session with --with-ck-launch. My user has no additional predefined groups and after reinstall I have xfce only. Maybe I decade :) ago, I remember that ck rules was mandatory. What I'm missing ? I feel frustrated - it's the first time FreeBSD game me more rights, not less =/ From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 23 13:57:02 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AC6DBC21DE for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 13:57:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rcarter@pinyon.org) Received: from h2.pinyon.org (h2.pinyon.org [65.101.5.250]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 41D321CCC for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 13:57:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rcarter@pinyon.org) Received: by h2.pinyon.org (Postfix, from userid 58) id 33A0936D43; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 06:56:55 -0700 (MST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=pinyon.org; s=DKIM; t=1471960615; bh=X/S6GG/ZJmSF6bODMtlQVu571AcuZpFfYocrs+JtEnI=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=p5cxsp8Cg1hAHNBq+cWG3dwbAPqSv5gCiQ73bR8NlIJT0eUpm3zU5wLtkgShw7eFx /p8RJNms+CwTWA/RT1wBLMmxxDP4K/26gldgT4VK/Js5soLDu4vfEUSo3314vPn94z exTECswfgfmwYWCLKTILZisSeNruhyepeLtUFCcY= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on h2.pinyon.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from [10.0.10.15] (h4.esturion.net [65.101.5.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by h2.pinyon.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 57F4836D36 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 06:56:54 -0700 (MST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=pinyon.org; s=DKIM; t=1471960614; bh=X/S6GG/ZJmSF6bODMtlQVu571AcuZpFfYocrs+JtEnI=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Q4evbA9PGRmfRnFlZNFC0fCnQxv9SiX4FVbsg69GLgLvBWeytEVT3Gleidy5yEtiK Md6+sKe1CzB/CU6VaLkAaeuUIKr60p8ZuOJblip1StJdAQ313/tIWXtsdsHMafEnCu 6v9Bhymr7oUs8+PwqiK26KqZGvqQwY+X4qWqFcZk= Subject: Re: fontconfig update uglifies fonts To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <729af4af-0ed3-4d45-2e68-b4483e08110a@pinyon.org> <20160823024147.GB84554@kyleck.sig11.fr> From: "Russell L. Carter" Message-ID: Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 06:56:53 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160823024147.GB84554@kyleck.sig11.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 13:57:02 -0000 On 08/22/16 19:41, Pierre Guinoiseau wrote: > Hi, > > can I suggest replacing Bitstream Vera with DejaVu? Bitstream Vera fonts > have been unmaintained for more than 12 years and have a lot of hinting > issues, whereas DejaVu fonts are a very popular and well maintained fork > of them and have a very nice hinting. It might fix your issue and you > won't notice the difference. Ok, thank you for the suggestion. My how the years fly by. I now have DejaVu running in emacs and it's not bad, but not quite as good as Bitstream Vera. If it solves the other font issues I can live with it. I'm in the middle of bringing up 11/stable and then I have to rebuild 1000+ ports so I'll start back again on fonts (sigh) if I need to once that's done. Best, Russell > Cheers, > Pierre > > On 2016-08-22 17:01:33, Russell L. Carter wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> On 10/stable amd64, the recent fontconfig update makes the fonts used >> in thunderbird, firefox, (u)xterm, and emacs quite a bit uglier. The >> font strokes seem to be thicker and fuzzier. Emacs I fixed by >> reinstalling bitstream-vera, but (u)xterm use that and they're still >> broken. I ran fc-cache -f, but no change. I turned off antialiasing >> via /usr/local/etc/fonts/local.conf and that made the strokes nice and >> thin but overall even uglier. >> >> Any ideas/pointers on how to fix this? >> >> Thanks, >> Russell >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 23 14:28:23 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD06BC3360 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 14:28:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from duchateau.olivier@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x233.google.com (mail-wm0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 11EDF135B for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 14:28:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from duchateau.olivier@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x233.google.com with SMTP id o80so198489693wme.1 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 07:28:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cFqF0R9f/W9f/VaEXyioKbftqIEXdfpfmjLdZlWPqII=; b=Wszh1w7hWpK/Ucsh5Jw0a3evRblTFh2c1zLS2IYSGwbFXc9aT40jTNljVbFmtdCqld fIcvmm8sQSxjEdcxPYhxJ4Vi3poHdsTg6qk5a/RMLab1qC2yramOQZYZFoWbWjeZmDZ2 uzKStaSG+6bWVPGlVVlpfnLkbjMuOIB1uvBRs05QgDfQU2z5kUVnCN2AGNZ47T9MrA25 vIsG9+6bJG8NJcxtWiYWoEyMSlyivhkRPhxW+M+RK9m/MYf7wb89+NHSOZPHmGzEVFfm 3SKSofIxAd5k/sLptdBwGv3iuVlGhQTZEDNJfpRmauDgF1GfaewT9B7G8pEFEQOanhjR EUag== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cFqF0R9f/W9f/VaEXyioKbftqIEXdfpfmjLdZlWPqII=; b=fUr7erLfzPSA6PQsQyqYCX3PTBSfc4Hi7ofq/0xWgQ3zsmJEqtxkqNgqduxmH7svb9 NTVd0xZUcOPI4bGZMQSf1ZndKgRAFjDUMYCBaCrJvsl2iTJeGn+DUzuGVpTE+5FNB1Ex xVlFkxwM45EMFJnduDPBEJ0EJXsMfwejQ8/LnBKhmkTl3c96JxuuliuT+dEfgtg1R/oR /8ySMMqfQR1cL7QN9Tcq85xcQuMDL55gq43auJy4+T486kL4nHBWW6fTTbLC/Ca9vdes Cqhog8JZ6ApZgUaLcjuk7Dg0RpKpEtxjv3WyWZn3kqW7DOooFiNEKa7TriG3fvm9kLrr yqaA== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouuMTlemHBSIkTvphr5i855BJX0aGXFacxXOOVBKp0Y59BxAZeKd7VBzJlRwMibhqQ== X-Received: by 10.28.96.11 with SMTP id u11mr19345182wmb.5.1471962500990; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 07:28:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tuborg (AMarseille-655-1-741-50.w109-208.abo.wanadoo.fr. [109.208.194.50]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c8sm4151243wjm.19.2016.08.23.07.28.19 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 23 Aug 2016 07:28:20 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Olivier Duchateau Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:24:45 +0000 From: Olivier Duchateau To: abi@abinet.ru Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xfce - confusing rights to shutdown without polkit rules Message-Id: <20160823162445.ac3fa3ab4b4c72ecc7f0d46d@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.29; i386-portbld-freebsd9.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 14:28:23 -0000 On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:44:32 +0300 abi@abinet.ru wrote: > > > Hello, > > I have something mysterious on my installation. I reinstalled, but I > still have the issue. > > xfce4-session states that I must write ck rules to get rights for reboot > and shutdown. However, I have all rights (reboot, shutdown, suspend > hibernate) without any rules at all. All I need is start session with > --with-ck-launch. My user has no additional predefined groups and after > reinstall I have xfce only. > > Maybe I decade :) ago, I remember that ck rules was mandatory. What I'm > missing ? I feel frustrated - it's the first time FreeBSD game me more > rights, not less =/ Hi, You need to write your own polkit rules, for shutdown, reboot, suspend and so on. See pkg info -D xfce4-session Stop to launch your session with option --with-ck-launch (usually it's wrong) x11-wm/xfce4-session provides xinitrc script, uses it! For more details, see this thread on the forum [1] and my Xfce's FAQ [2]. Regards, [1] https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/53490/ [2] https://people.freebsd.org/~olivierd/xfce-faq.html > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Olivier Duchateau From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 23 16:01:59 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F00A9BC2453 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:01:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abi@abinet.ru) Received: from mail.abinet.ru (mail.abinet.ru [136.243.72.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B635C1537; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:01:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abi@abinet.ru) Received: from [10.0.0.1] (unknown [10.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.abinet.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2D60B24FAB; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:01:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=abinet.ru; s=dkim; t=1471968117; bh=dmfBaRgenaOWYmGdsELqH9zVLwxb+Xh6hgololm0GhE=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=SHd/NOYUN2xgnTVCRh/Lqk3v5qhJcsMKTlWX2QK8+8PVgbZr5+Bh/BVYSE7TS5ySq v61BTTMk0BIEJoEIHJGIQJuOUX5uz5CWK0WkVXRXa827hwkwbqJL0aQapRlFSjlWxY dm3F3u5yyfq7lV1qzYEmEJR67VFVbgSuYRpXb6ms= Message-ID: <57BC7374.4080106@abinet.ru> Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 19:01:56 +0300 From: abi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:) Gecko/20160112 FossaMail/25.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Olivier Duchateau CC: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xfce - confusing rights to shutdown without polkit rules References: <20160823162445.ac3fa3ab4b4c72ecc7f0d46d@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20160823162445.ac3fa3ab4b4c72ecc7f0d46d@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:02:00 -0000 I see, memory played a trick with me. I was sure that --with-ck-launch is complimentary part of rules. Later, I realized ck is activated by dbus. To my excuse: 1. polkit sets wrong permissons on /usr/local/etc/polkit-1 folder and has no rights to read directory 2. example rules have logic error in braces. 3. slim (if used) must be compiled without ck support Baah, I lost 2 days :) Thank you, now I cooked xfce properly! On 23.08.2016 19:24, Olivier Duchateau wrote: > On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:44:32 +0300 > abi@abinet.ru wrote: > >> >> >> Hello, >> >> I have something mysterious on my installation. I reinstalled, but I >> still have the issue. >> >> xfce4-session states that I must write ck rules to get rights for reboot >> and shutdown. However, I have all rights (reboot, shutdown, suspend >> hibernate) without any rules at all. All I need is start session with >> --with-ck-launch. My user has no additional predefined groups and after >> reinstall I have xfce only. >> >> Maybe I decade :) ago, I remember that ck rules was mandatory. What I'm >> missing ? I feel frustrated - it's the first time FreeBSD game me more >> rights, not less =/ > Hi, > > You need to write your own polkit rules, for shutdown, reboot, suspend and so on. > > See pkg info -D xfce4-session > > Stop to launch your session with option --with-ck-launch (usually it's wrong) x11-wm/xfce4-session provides xinitrc script, uses it! > > For more details, see this thread on the forum [1] and my Xfce's FAQ [2]. > > Regards, > > [1] https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/53490/ > [2] https://people.freebsd.org/~olivierd/xfce-faq.html > >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 23 16:28:58 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 281C2BC2E92 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:28:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from duchateau.olivier@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x234.google.com (mail-wm0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF0A71CFE for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:28:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from duchateau.olivier@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x234.google.com with SMTP id f65so169198628wmi.0 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:28:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4tXzQ+zQjMPJIHeqA9k0voOcS8G/GrabjYrnZ6IGfVE=; b=ZIDiBoEt/UiXhif0W0t/B4dgr/2iS4g78dHDU1xKm+20wFhQC6eoL7kBewggjszlzK KzYN/SH4OQOJRtAZypvDLnGTiHi3VQAnNJkbHXhitXCDcEmOtAWvV7E+HqxPY3ARoKqL VvluZFQi4NDe2vDgHs4ToBfAGAND933A16Xtcz19ezsvWyxL2g1QXcKrDAlCzEyjUIXH 8cDvACBsHgc1kpJNYx9hna1hPmFbitOehii1aLMQwFs+pB/OxvLZ62r2znCzQqItH0O9 lq70QcAE4hoVeI66UTDBOzICXCnsDhEt617PFB/r6RqN9vOXpmAPVv/LP5E+xZiVrL2y 84OQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4tXzQ+zQjMPJIHeqA9k0voOcS8G/GrabjYrnZ6IGfVE=; b=PUWxico7tg/alX7U2Ue9S8hkpld4xZ4rNd98gsCVmg4ZlmS/pFL87eEdKn/96O9HOu s+WHmW9fFTfwKenzheKpc1YYfmf/dfut7d6dX00ZTpiP/LdWJcVtk2xBantxFBiCO2Tr rvQKsdBKjpmJLe6BK3YGg1CzOl4/jlPbJbwyjr6WO4lx6DaSy4Cz1FCSnJHqzKTC8M6h 2h/EPCi67RhsSdlwDc6tG8s4/ZbcCJl8Tjc1QtyyBw74aI2o9/BrCJyXpK50i4PX0YPD gBbS2ktPY/k90fhE5LdzVXfkwJLHb07o6yaV+n+sSo/ESRlzYzvDBhFBFee9csIgQi06 s9pA== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouspGMh6jkH+BnztPqhmhiYZuSSWPwi/kvzW365XonTZFZcGpCCA7ZRgnzUeGJjSlg== X-Received: by 10.194.78.74 with SMTP id z10mr22088926wjw.68.1471969736159; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:28:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tuborg (AMarseille-655-1-741-50.w109-208.abo.wanadoo.fr. [109.208.194.50]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q4sm4706656wjk.24.2016.08.23.09.28.54 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 23 Aug 2016 09:28:55 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Olivier Duchateau Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 18:25:25 +0000 From: Olivier Duchateau To: abi Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xfce - confusing rights to shutdown without polkit rules Message-Id: <20160823182525.37b338368458bc74c2366a2a@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <57BC7374.4080106@abinet.ru> References: <20160823162445.ac3fa3ab4b4c72ecc7f0d46d@freebsd.org> <57BC7374.4080106@abinet.ru> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.29; i386-portbld-freebsd9.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:28:58 -0000 On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 19:01:56 +0300 abi wrote: > I see, memory played a trick with me. I was sure that --with-ck-launch > is complimentary part of rules. Later, I realized ck is activated by dbus. > > To my excuse: > > 1. polkit sets wrong permissons on /usr/local/etc/polkit-1 folder and > has no rights to read directory > 2. example rules have logic error in braces. > 3. slim (if used) must be compiled without ck support 2. examples rules have no logic error, it's rather cosmetics changes (my point of view), see polkit(8) examples and you can see no additional braces. 3. x11/slim is compiled with ConsoleKit support, why not uses it? > Baah, I lost 2 days :) > > Thank you, now I cooked xfce properly! > > On 23.08.2016 19:24, Olivier Duchateau wrote: > > On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:44:32 +0300 > > abi@abinet.ru wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> Hello, > >> > >> I have something mysterious on my installation. I reinstalled, but I > >> still have the issue. > >> > >> xfce4-session states that I must write ck rules to get rights for reboot > >> and shutdown. However, I have all rights (reboot, shutdown, suspend > >> hibernate) without any rules at all. All I need is start session with > >> --with-ck-launch. My user has no additional predefined groups and after > >> reinstall I have xfce only. > >> > >> Maybe I decade :) ago, I remember that ck rules was mandatory. What I'm > >> missing ? I feel frustrated - it's the first time FreeBSD game me more > >> rights, not less =/ > > Hi, > > > > You need to write your own polkit rules, for shutdown, reboot, suspend and so on. > > > > See pkg info -D xfce4-session > > > > Stop to launch your session with option --with-ck-launch (usually it's wrong) x11-wm/xfce4-session provides xinitrc script, uses it! > > > > For more details, see this thread on the forum [1] and my Xfce's FAQ [2]. > > > > Regards, > > > > [1] https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/53490/ > > [2] https://people.freebsd.org/~olivierd/xfce-faq.html > > > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > -- Olivier Duchateau From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 23 16:37:23 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66BEABC31DE for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:37:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abi@abinet.ru) Received: from mail.abinet.ru (mail.abinet.ru [136.243.72.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D08B1595; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:37:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abi@abinet.ru) Received: from [10.0.0.1] (unknown [10.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.abinet.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BD6D624FF5; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:37:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=abinet.ru; s=dkim; t=1471970241; bh=Sx+QLgUfwy4K0duednTutgpbaQMY1EVlL4nIlvf78Xw=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=h8I+W6K7i25DT2+zpt4FX7nCDXc9LZjrWBAFXaG/0b65ebNzH/uUgD4LwhVFfOpiX kY0FdQtE0KOiEwVO7FSVa0EhXLKu267EK/4OBXwaOrSZKesHER0bQ7jDig+SZMzHWy FqlhnS0ScA4cH7aQ0hzP6r1782tfU8uH8h5l2RxA= Message-ID: <57BC7BC1.90402@abinet.ru> Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 19:37:21 +0300 From: abi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:) Gecko/20160112 FossaMail/25.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Olivier Duchateau CC: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xfce - confusing rights to shutdown without polkit rules References: <20160823162445.ac3fa3ab4b4c72ecc7f0d46d@freebsd.org> <57BC7374.4080106@abinet.ru> <20160823182525.37b338368458bc74c2366a2a@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20160823182525.37b338368458bc74c2366a2a@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:37:23 -0000 3. You will get all rights without polkit rules. On 23.08.2016 21:25, Olivier Duchateau wrote: > On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 19:01:56 +0300 > abi wrote: > >> I see, memory played a trick with me. I was sure that --with-ck-launch >> is complimentary part of rules. Later, I realized ck is activated by dbus. >> >> To my excuse: >> >> 1. polkit sets wrong permissons on /usr/local/etc/polkit-1 folder and >> has no rights to read directory >> 2. example rules have logic error in braces. >> 3. slim (if used) must be compiled without ck support > 2. examples rules have no logic error, it's rather cosmetics changes (my point of view), see polkit(8) examples and you can see no additional braces. > > 3. x11/slim is compiled with ConsoleKit support, why not uses it? > >> Baah, I lost 2 days :) >> >> Thank you, now I cooked xfce properly! >> >> On 23.08.2016 19:24, Olivier Duchateau wrote: >>> On Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:44:32 +0300 >>> abi@abinet.ru wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I have something mysterious on my installation. I reinstalled, but I >>>> still have the issue. >>>> >>>> xfce4-session states that I must write ck rules to get rights for reboot >>>> and shutdown. However, I have all rights (reboot, shutdown, suspend >>>> hibernate) without any rules at all. All I need is start session with >>>> --with-ck-launch. My user has no additional predefined groups and after >>>> reinstall I have xfce only. >>>> >>>> Maybe I decade :) ago, I remember that ck rules was mandatory. What I'm >>>> missing ? I feel frustrated - it's the first time FreeBSD game me more >>>> rights, not less =/ >>> Hi, >>> >>> You need to write your own polkit rules, for shutdown, reboot, suspend and so on. >>> >>> See pkg info -D xfce4-session >>> >>> Stop to launch your session with option --with-ck-launch (usually it's wrong) x11-wm/xfce4-session provides xinitrc script, uses it! >>> >>> For more details, see this thread on the forum [1] and my Xfce's FAQ [2]. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> [1] https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/53490/ >>> [2] https://people.freebsd.org/~olivierd/xfce-faq.html >>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 23 18:01:52 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0CEBBC3274 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 18:01:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timp87@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x243.google.com (mail-wm0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35F161DF1 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 18:01:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timp87@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x243.google.com with SMTP id i5so19137116wmg.2 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 11:01:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=0N/e5Usvtyv3ZyzR9rYtQqnkZTtJJbp0Vw8tmPUj7Yw=; b=hwunuXCkCDCOqQZafz41Uxv32qjY3E/CMCKOAha1aeUFLBS9HIjWvTdej4Yq80Kcv8 q+aKquUsOQjPmAiFv8EsZHy90gD39hSIhhmyiaEkkNk19c5vHq4IRXuZ1ECYSo7RVEQ2 2G6zvlPcfx0BlUfZq5U9Xz3Sxb7ReeBXk0kBv6FSI00uI19Fuzs3cx2IowNYdNKSbExP 5uiIfMAfDnUgJc4DJoTJWwaUe641OjTN8/gQHRPV2wdCxYZfstKU7iFj3U66e2R7Icj0 IwxgkzILCBkEmZmn14hvAp7Jrigpq6VrXDmHJloVwxDvSHuWwIrVs229tNnmDfs2FFWv F6Cw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=0N/e5Usvtyv3ZyzR9rYtQqnkZTtJJbp0Vw8tmPUj7Yw=; b=m7eZIMuIWx/pbaTU/fnyDMvE3bKuwDojn3COxED4GAsBNJ84/mpRki0z0Uxb+oRKH/ w0l4a07B7vOR7vMCyILgPOC7FT8y4kcRJ4lpuFLV7Vy0mEAoCH39OJjCAMokpoQVt90X lQeqnLOMXPdG1vnHoQQOLeET5uoqwReYhOVdgDsxALtJg2SxRPV7+dipaiT/JC/NllDG at252JcE3ZKg5H9zxSNBxKCgQ9hW/X0DGaqZaguzOJPNcwZo/MFKo1mpGXimCdcd6oQi plyYRDOqDzu8EgwKELh1MeVeq1llPQXmEvmOclHC4CFUEoNDVwqQBX1Al+E8j8+6r1On OXUg== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouup6tsTAYZlYrtozTIsh4KWCwRPTy21/FdtkLE8CX3lIPPMQmet+0bIPdR+wigeV6oLIryC4hRIBH6vZw== X-Received: by 10.28.113.151 with SMTP id d23mr21814778wmi.89.1471975310563; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 11:01:50 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.41.66 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 11:01:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.28.41.66 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 11:01:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Pavel Timofeev Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 21:01:49 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [CFT] [NEW PORT] www/ufdbguard To: ports-list freebsd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 18:01:52 -0000 22 =D0=B0=D0=B2=D0=B3. 2016 =D0=B3. 11:54 =D0=BF=D0=BE=D0=BB=D1=8C=D0=B7=D0= =BE=D0=B2=D0=B0=D1=82=D0=B5=D0=BB=D1=8C "Pavel Timofeev" =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=BB: > > Hello, FreeBSD community! > > I've made a port of ufdbGuard - a fork of squidGuard compatible with > newer Squid versions. > Generally speaking it's an URL filter for Squid. > https://www.urlfilterdb.com/products/ufdbguard.html > > If you're interested, please, review and/or test it. I'd appreciate > any kind of feedback! > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D212044 > > Thank you! It' s able to package in poudriere now. Please, test it. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 23 18:22:59 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFBF6BC3D79 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 18:22:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 951111F4D for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 18:22:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1bcGLl-000CRW-Ot; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 20:23:01 +0200 Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 20:23:01 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Pavel Timofeev Cc: ports-list freebsd Subject: Re: [CFT] [NEW PORT] www/ufdbguard Message-ID: <20160823182301.GP96200@home.opsec.eu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 18:22:59 -0000 Hi! > It' s able to package in poudriere now. > Please, test it. I've tried it in poudriere, it looks very promising, but there is still the same error ? For example, see my buildlog for 11a at http://people.freebsd.org/~pi/logs/www__ufdbguard-11a-1471974874.txt -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 23 19:08:51 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15D32BC4A89 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 19:08:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raul@b2n.org) Received: from mail1.isdefe.es (mail1.isdefe.es [194.15.213.239]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF2341F9D for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 19:08:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raul@b2n.org) Received: from turing.b2n.org (unknown [172.24.1.14]) by mail1.isdefe.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id E01DD2BAA6E for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 21:08:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from MacBook-Pro-de-Raul.local (unknown [10.0.0.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by turing.b2n.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B15CB35E20D for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 21:08:48 +0200 (CEST) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: =?UTF-8?B?UmHDumw=?= Subject: problem with net-mgmt/icinga2 upgrading from 2.4.10 to 2.5.1 (r420729) Message-ID: <1d0d6326-213d-228a-38d1-e546ea53543a@b2n.org> Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 21:08:48 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.1.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 19:08:51 -0000 Hello! grateful for the great work on the ports I don't remember last problem upgrading with them, Awesome! just a little setback upgraded using portmaster, everything went apparently fine followed pkg-message to update schema db as I use mysql, also fine but when I try to start it I got: [....] # service icinga2 start Performing sanity check of icinga2 configuration: /usr/local/lib/icinga2/libcli.so: Undefined symbol "_ZN6icinga14ConfigCompiler15CollectIncludesERNSt3__16vectorIPNS_10ExpressionENS1_9allocatorIS4_EEEERKNS_6StringESB_SB_" FAILED [....] Not sure if I'm alone here. this box runs 10.3-RELEASE-p6 and make.conf contains [....] INSTALL_NODEBUG="YES" OPTIONS_UNSET=X11 OPTIONS_UNSET=GUI BATCH=YES FORCE_PKG_REGISTER=yes WITH_PKGNG=yes #WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes DEFAULT_VERSIONS+= ssl=openssl [....] Best regards, Raúl. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 23 19:19:13 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A46DBC4EED for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 19:19:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B7AA1A0F for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 19:19:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 5AD65BC4EEC; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 19:19:13 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A81CBC4EEB for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 19:19:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Received: from mx5.roble.com (mx5.roble.com [206.40.34.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx5.roble.com", Issuer "mx5.roble.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 404011A0E for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 19:19:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 12:19:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Roger Marquis To: Matt Smith cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upcoming OpenSSL 1.1.0 release In-Reply-To: <20160823124201.GB48814@xtaz.uk> References: <6d35459045985929d061f3c6cca85efe@imap.brnrd.eu> <0E328A9485C47045F93C19AB@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20160823124201.GB48814@xtaz.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 19:19:13 -0000 Matt Smith wrote: > Going slightly off-topic, I'm curious what the opinion is around this > and LibreSSL. My organization evaluated this a few months ago and after a few diffs and code reviews decided that libressl was the future. We updated poudriere and all make.confs, removed openssl, installed libressl and have had no issues. We did the same with openntp a few months earlier and recommend both for any installation that needs good security. Roger From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 23 19:33:50 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB776BC39CE for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 19:33:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timp87@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x243.google.com (mail-wm0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91CCD11B9 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 19:33:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timp87@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x243.google.com with SMTP id q128so19434748wma.1 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 12:33:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Si0sKDa8KVHRLqGepwuxWskLGYqx2ehJkGIPdb8SMeY=; b=kBsJTZu9mOVmJO/35OYZSkBQURHWgtiAKk9wU9weCTGxfa003+3KHmPRxKIyHV8Nsm 975VSmvToeuSIsWa1VZ3GDr2Ae64jJZa5EgF+T3xEab8huxrEllGQXk50KOfmwKGFRr6 Mtl06uxdzCiqAhV+RgsAXlkJZuV8/J7AtbjyHcPwM7fvGV78S5nm9tDMflvInAxCVTnv VjySzVJOFojTPlo4TMiXsgj3VozX4az32LE5cUEUm8agjwGvnLvy8rCkXgezlmw9L8pD 0FckHb9bKcn7KM0qmCPysqAhdhKyPBH5dkHNfBblKdq7rgF5YFnFy4SxYH6XCLuVtNbl 0xTQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Si0sKDa8KVHRLqGepwuxWskLGYqx2ehJkGIPdb8SMeY=; b=McS7W1HN25CCtOx1qvyLSu/2yNkEMrPI4t1VRD6x9oVIwl0DtpHXOveWvop1gjBVbh xtdBo/AS8+3nZ/aueSs+guS4TrcdeVaCdUBGdvIzGHVwkMbmsjJWGSvtGoihgDWqWRYL pb9UAsWnWNafwIb18DAitNI04Q5VzMq/kkKEV+W6+uljGPyjqujm2npIesSfu59HMAJb EHxi0RvPAfxA84yjYWsPINq33SfmPobjQAcv3eBbmWJo94HkHjgaSvkfZ/59OA0StC7K CtMMHMPAtGtcajjJcADBHHP9SUBoS3uDgXyJdCva6eIlrYKZZNMIFMOyFpXij2WaC6D7 TL2w== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouveUY9q4lZgCD3apCWJYbFFXfKCo+WdZasNNo/hYNj3KfyWkZwA7Yo6i6JCd4+NXUmb7HLPEcurt8zCRA== X-Received: by 10.194.110.102 with SMTP id hz6mr23173948wjb.5.1471980829116; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 12:33:49 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.41.66 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 12:33:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160823182301.GP96200@home.opsec.eu> References: <20160823182301.GP96200@home.opsec.eu> From: Pavel Timofeev Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 22:33:48 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [CFT] [NEW PORT] www/ufdbguard To: Kurt Jaeger Cc: ports-list freebsd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 19:33:51 -0000 2016-08-23 21:23 GMT+03:00 Kurt Jaeger : > Hi! > >> It' s able to package in poudriere now. >> Please, test it. > > I've tried it in poudriere, it looks very promising, but there > is still the same error ? > > For example, see my buildlog for 11a at > > http://people.freebsd.org/~pi/logs/www__ufdbguard-11a-1471974874.txt > > -- That's weird, I can't reproduce it. I used poudriere-3.1.14_2. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 23 19:46:27 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB418BC3F92 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 19:46:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADE701BF2 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 19:46:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1bcHeY-000Cae-Jx; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 21:46:30 +0200 Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 21:46:30 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Pavel Timofeev Cc: ports-list freebsd Subject: Re: [CFT] [NEW PORT] www/ufdbguard Message-ID: <20160823194630.GQ96200@home.opsec.eu> References: <20160823182301.GP96200@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 19:46:28 -0000 Hi! > > I've tried it in poudriere, it looks very promising, but there > > is still the same error ? > > > > For example, see my buildlog for 11a at > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~pi/logs/www__ufdbguard-11a-1471974874.txt > That's weird, I can't reproduce it. Then normally it's my extensive use of fancy things that's the cause 8-} > I used poudriere-3.1.14_2. Here it's poudriere-devel-3.1.99.20160624_2 so that's probably the cause. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 23 20:02:10 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35FABBC462C for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 20:02:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@xtaz.co.uk) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2057D1E3F for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 20:02:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@xtaz.co.uk) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 1F7B4BC462B; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 20:02:10 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F19FBC462A for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 20:02:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@xtaz.co.uk) Received: from mail.xtaz.uk (tao.xtaz.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:fe33::10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC4AD1E3D for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 20:02:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@xtaz.co.uk) Received: by mail.xtaz.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1E9B1209AF50; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 20:54:35 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xtaz.co.uk; s=mail; t=1471982075; x=1473796475; bh=hFjgYSq7XMmVXWjA8sRmZNfVgtiChr6aqzHkIfMkBPQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References; b=PtrW0s0Lh1EIDi9a+nz7HUQ4lk+olBCNDlafMk1PT7Oa0uLJXx40HB0TBum0TWsGm aSWQMlmDibCHSDqqUnFRIvOX5gtNQTRPMMtaT/P+5rjyigGM2gZ36JkQDt2mxk+InH fSdxU5p7O8LneTEJRJY6jVm6OkOGUbNDlllNgbWJ3i2/VZTsEocnA/oNRLzSoIAOY9 P666GOTEWgIMgDjLi8/M5AB0oR4WtPMuWfYII5tI1t09TWk5xvJaP3u7IoX2ejvntb DX4rgmpkNzd3+j7+wd5TgqqQaQeczKclYHKiRZpun59ny3l7J6VL/ZRps/Tt960hUr vi0uYDO+2/+Yg== Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 20:54:35 +0100 From: Matt Smith To: Roger Marquis Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upcoming OpenSSL 1.1.0 release Message-ID: <20160823195434.GB98827@xtaz.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matt Smith , Roger Marquis , ports@freebsd.org References: <6d35459045985929d061f3c6cca85efe@imap.brnrd.eu> <0E328A9485C47045F93C19AB@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20160823124201.GB48814@xtaz.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 20:02:10 -0000 On Aug 23 12:19, Roger Marquis wrote: >Matt Smith wrote: >>Going slightly off-topic, I'm curious what the opinion is around this >>and LibreSSL. > >My organization evaluated this a few months ago and after a few diffs >and code reviews decided that libressl was the future. We updated >poudriere and all make.confs, removed openssl, installed libressl and >have had no issues. We did the same with openntp a few months earlier >and recommend both for any installation that needs good security. > >Roger I have been running libressl-devel for the past few months and other than having to manually patch a few ports to get them to compile have also had no problems. However this was the case a few months ago. My questioning is specifically related to the upcoming OpenSSL 1.1 which in theory has had a lot of work done to it by a full-time paid team of developers. In fact it was meant to be released back in May but was delayed specifically so that they could squash all remaining bugs. It would be interesting if somebody could audit the changes to see how it compares to LibreSSL after it's released. There is a possibility that it may actually be the better path going forward. -- Matt From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 23 20:27:12 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A85D7BC4DC6 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 20:27:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cork1@vs01.logotipo.net) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90903121B for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 20:27:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cork1@vs01.logotipo.net) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 8C3C7BC4DC5; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 20:27:12 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BE30BC4DC4 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 20:27:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cork1@vs01.logotipo.net) Received: from vs01.logotipo.net (vs01.logotipo.net [185.11.166.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3757D1214 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 20:27:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cork1@vs01.logotipo.net) Received: from cork1 by vs01.logotipo.net with local (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1bcGbb-002cM5-7e for ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 19:39:23 +0100 To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Delivery Notification, ID 00600645 X-PHP-Script: corkway.com/post.php for 195.225.171.104 Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 19:39:23 +0100 From: "FedEx 2Day A.M." Reply-To: "FedEx 2Day A.M." Message-ID: <0e595f74cafae5295770c791264ed92c@corkway.com> X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - vs01.logotipo.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [508 508] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - vs01.logotipo.net X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: vs01.logotipo.net: authenticated_id: cork1/from_h X-Authenticated-Sender: vs01.logotipo.net: kyle.nixon@corkway.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 20:27:12 -0000 Dear Customer, This is to confirm that one or more of your parcels has been shipped. You can review complete details of your order in the find attached. Kind regards, Kyle Nixon, Sr. Operation Manager. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 23 20:39:33 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C9C4BC40FB for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 20:39:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69E461C89 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 20:39:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 65AD6BC40FA; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 20:39:33 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 654A1BC40F9 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 20:39:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it0-x234.google.com (mail-it0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D5F51C88 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 20:39:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it0-x234.google.com with SMTP id x131so171131284ite.0 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 13:39:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=w1dQzDAgJGcwsRYQYYCf4QV4ZK5h0fxwa+vhCwHvI2w=; b=rTMbqsUw0cPesETsW6NsJH+AkCWj0Z/ovr3iri1kNBduGFfaP6qUTFk9X5tmukYKiu Lm+c706K1oT7phG1r79kLqevhHcUmaTFJzkBUr1Y3kPp4eXt9+ixutZNh6rswz788SV3 6FfdmxYoYEhnXutfr3JzoOjenukew5b/RQmYlXS68f6ghwrrwjuKdb3VcRODcXu5VcHD LNSf1DuGd8gF12qLkXt0e3DW9Sc3QrVoNsT1IJo5dDCwlUI+7iZY8IrAPtBem+TW4GG2 H4Lb66/gqQo3ZBkpXxdRjOV+4bRnlAG4Pz+p9fad7QQZLLoIQYg5339I8GS6Zb4m5z6e aA3g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to; bh=w1dQzDAgJGcwsRYQYYCf4QV4ZK5h0fxwa+vhCwHvI2w=; b=hH+OeZ0BjZv+P4OfcsTlzS8/yABDgTBASWxPA0BmdgQu1ig3FvOn/WlJMrbU4ihcrH oXBCO/Fbxi6CcHvDNETuAEvwMwq0/kDF9o5eDAVITC4Axrb3UUHHc30b+nhW7JRLmSo1 CNeYtXVscIrkQFIdq20q6sM1rNOzj45lKqqxyt8rszdgkx/BOxLKLh8tPOSluudISmdn ynzXxibfH7JngrG4O0xs9xacnSeD481bnvMH22apNT8PwhLHkg/ttA/ZD6SANFsMv6fc Qba63redqh+Fto+MNQsqDcehggaGhKsY/5I4pV//l32++4SLQcOd6n4ebTS4sN/LaHS0 TtWg== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoousS9383JzYv+59kWzRTx+aDd0Z14A61FmxdTZXYv9yVaNQtkOwhe8OHfY08JAH9im69nfcbCcpGAdfqDw== X-Received: by 10.36.65.198 with SMTP id b67mr27169334itd.53.1471984772613; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 13:39:32 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.79.119.144 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 13:39:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160823195434.GB98827@xtaz.uk> References: <6d35459045985929d061f3c6cca85efe@imap.brnrd.eu> <0E328A9485C47045F93C19AB@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20160823124201.GB48814@xtaz.uk> <20160823195434.GB98827@xtaz.uk> From: Kevin Oberman Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 13:39:32 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: dCDuerL8Ieg-rlIEsE3WeKQOfyg Message-ID: Subject: Re: Upcoming OpenSSL 1.1.0 release To: Matt Smith , Roger Marquis , "ports@FreeBSD.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2016 20:39:33 -0000 On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Matt Smith via freebsd-ports < freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> wrote: > On Aug 23 12:19, Roger Marquis wrote: > >> Matt Smith wrote: >> >>> Going slightly off-topic, I'm curious what the opinion is around this >>> and LibreSSL. >>> >> >> My organization evaluated this a few months ago and after a few diffs >> and code reviews decided that libressl was the future. We updated >> poudriere and all make.confs, removed openssl, installed libressl and >> have had no issues. We did the same with openntp a few months earlier >> and recommend both for any installation that needs good security. >> >> Roger >> > > I have been running libressl-devel for the past few months and other than > having to manually patch a few ports to get them to compile have also had > no problems. However this was the case a few months ago. My questioning is > specifically related to the upcoming OpenSSL 1.1 which in theory has had a > lot of work done to it by a full-time paid team of developers. In fact it > was meant to be released back in May but was delayed specifically so that > they could squash all remaining bugs. It would be interesting if somebody > could audit the changes to see how it compares to LibreSSL after it's > released. There is a possibility that it may actually be the better path > going forward. > > > -- > Matt > I think OpenSSL is the way to go at this time. I have great faith in the skills of the people who work on LibreSSL, but they are very, very conservative on things like new algorithms and will likely lag behind OpenSSL for this reason. This will mean incompatibilities with some new applications which will force the use of OpenSSL. Then you get into ugly issues with multiple shareable libraries that will create conflicts that, in Windows-land are referred to as "DLL hell". Having spent too much time there, once as a result of a mix of tools build with the base system OpenSSL and and ports OpenSSL. Also, even now (or last I looked) there are API incompatibilities between the two as LibreSSL chose not to implement some functions in OpenSSL which can force the use of OpenSSL, at least for some ports. There is no "right" answer to this. ATM, OpenSSL looks like the bast choice to me and that is what I use. Depending on the on-going level of support for the two libraries, this may change, but it will be a problem for the foreseeable future. Ya pays your money and takes yer chances, unless you can bankroll support for one or the other by programmers competent in not only coding, but cryptography. Those folks are few in number and way beyond the budget of most of us. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 24 03:13:43 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA58DBC21B6 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 03:13:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timp87@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x242.google.com (mail-wm0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::242]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8035514F3 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 03:13:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timp87@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x242.google.com with SMTP id i138so738857wmf.3 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 20:13:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=hLTe6uUg3MVuQNyjUr3hTq8YIHtDHJ84C3NKzU80tH8=; b=MqZuiIML1+iLDmxCkZat2qmKI4/nVDMenal34kW5m4UQsAH6umFtKpzjyfwE4mLXi1 5nugOV5Mg2edXuWmEO6YXRfBV2TXNHnw1S23zesQ1B79jxECZB1ULtzYDq98QwI3u7yg rGp0oa2nededm3xVwluG22ak9POO0qPfPYgP75QtSxaxtKTeQCGLDmtNfBLZiE4ZcNVS 465jokw6qDhvyBS50HvDeCOyS69AqBvrtncfHy1eVlQMDEKTrC5FqS7uYBL9J0CzTmvS JqZ9vV3keG0zmfKi+cGJjRKCJdAGNROzQBDLqiC1BatkoG9OTGkOt7z/uvzqaiD0QXEu Cqug== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=hLTe6uUg3MVuQNyjUr3hTq8YIHtDHJ84C3NKzU80tH8=; b=Mu21D32l4rfBhG3vAapI3J0HtkP6GKevVpe8zrDdgdN8Ym88mbK1MEEgQw36IQtPtP NBWuT4FxI+ZwwFw0uNlMHU9cQJGT6b7cBrFOKUxsig9zbfpKswfZVcRv2wkgWf65kaTD ErsFo1v1zvRizMaudG2323KMcAffV5HK8jLLJl+sZVAjIOliq2O4jsYnXvaFbOMqPw8T HCGX2pRtu3T4OMRs3r6DaDJHdCUWmHg2AjEF3J8nNCCVoyAb27lFNdkOb09EPUTK/mPA 8ARDJjZPuRuvD7cuInUAeDorlCTHE6I+E/JUzTCbRQ7u2XE9G3CYEIlGGSpRrwsIXexL +n4Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkooutNrIj+SLyYcWdVNG7Jqq2vSgVx4zX5/UsrzKHJAKrZVVbKtDbiHUi2brw1g3uOSLTi8H8LfHl8nVer4Q== X-Received: by 10.28.99.86 with SMTP id x83mr22937531wmb.95.1472008421641; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 20:13:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.41.66 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 20:13:41 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20160823194630.GQ96200@home.opsec.eu> References: <20160823182301.GP96200@home.opsec.eu> <20160823194630.GQ96200@home.opsec.eu> From: Pavel Timofeev Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 06:13:41 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [CFT] [NEW PORT] www/ufdbguard To: Kurt Jaeger Cc: ports-list freebsd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 03:13:44 -0000 2016-08-23 22:46 GMT+03:00 Kurt Jaeger : > Hi! > >> > I've tried it in poudriere, it looks very promising, but there >> > is still the same error ? >> > >> > For example, see my buildlog for 11a at >> > >> > http://people.freebsd.org/~pi/logs/www__ufdbguard-11a-1471974874.txt > >> That's weird, I can't reproduce it. > > Then normally it's my extensive use of fancy things that's the > cause 8-} > >> I used poudriere-3.1.14_2. > > Here it's > > poudriere-devel-3.1.99.20160624_2 > > so that's probably the cause. > I've updated shar file and it build in poudriere-devel now. I simply eliminated that check. Please, test again ;) From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 24 04:10:37 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FC0CBC42EF for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 04:10:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42741191B for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 04:10:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1bcPWL-000DJQ-UH; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 06:10:33 +0200 Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 06:10:33 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Pavel Timofeev Cc: ports-list freebsd Subject: Re: [CFT] [NEW PORT] www/ufdbguard Message-ID: <20160824041033.GS96200@home.opsec.eu> References: <20160823182301.GP96200@home.opsec.eu> <20160823194630.GQ96200@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 04:10:37 -0000 Hi! > I've updated shar file and it build in poudriere-devel now. I simply > eliminated that check. > Please, test again ;) Done, builds, committed, thanks! -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 24 04:14:48 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE4C2BC4695 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 04:14:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timp87@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com (mail-wm0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 547341E77 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 04:14:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from timp87@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id q128so185377102wma.1 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 21:14:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=jnKJAd4ytutoKqEbTyCepQF0l79AyXqC0fw0eVlgjMc=; b=e45KdeVNAGhuhKyBTX2mExTuTuJNMqtpcmtvbBqAvRCPrUNura89i0uy/K5ofX52DE 0j4SIHJwzqvf509L0eKOXPmrWlZPx+jDjXMQjZ64+XpCNcsshiJkQjrD82PuRQDt0WlD 0yEJldXV6mAmXZXUstl9N5qJk+kGOt064QKq8Ixctd3fQiNCpIJrQTCidQ2FXF26FOk7 Wc7sguideJizIw+F4ndA0mEx55isz4dZf30PUkqlOyfRqPV3XfLPSU//SeGGAPHlTwA9 0rsxBQA551Ityez0zRKRgnyn4RrVnCOxD/RDexGAxQtxmFL5Jw3A2oOB/mfQYlgKNtGG FbSA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=jnKJAd4ytutoKqEbTyCepQF0l79AyXqC0fw0eVlgjMc=; b=CylCWaQprqx22HRIM5qgkEnJR2/f83CnpSt0Lea2Yp9Pxvsu79tDXbCc6zZOtQTgbL 3gSDxrrI+qlsxF8sTiACfPgvohHkOQsxknK8tdaO/QrQa47Qb+H3vTmgT1aSicUH2anv mtabyo8+ScxbtePwc66YpKTbe1NF1ez8qhefe/GBhCxgIY1t9RIpuoL2oQ2XYtUVCJaR cM1ZYZX7dK2YGFFtbsMXB3olOTxdzv80GxD533d5hOHC2eKKO+r02eyQm+BEQiHDlzml uf2wu2pPf7FH8Svum+C1pZhpobv/o092pzJFBDhZ1D3dMVhwJtmfpLKJRbjaCoYwsKSm gEjg== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNTpgTOC9C+37Cdd1GTtzmtmwPSSdPbm+xdTjQJBA2DrqRNIGqY+5cm/696yROoQhIT0hQvRu7S7qqKag== X-Received: by 10.28.103.6 with SMTP id b6mr1032948wmc.89.1472012086691; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 21:14:46 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.28.41.66 with HTTP; Tue, 23 Aug 2016 21:14:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Pavel Timofeev Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 07:14:46 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: net/3proxy: a fix to commit To: ports-list freebsd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 04:14:48 -0000 Hello, can anybody have a look and commit it if possible? https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209463 Thank you! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 24 04:43:31 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04574BC4D2C for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 04:43:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C01F01228 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 04:43:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1bcQ2D-000DM9-4Z; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 06:43:29 +0200 Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 06:43:29 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Pavel Timofeev Cc: ports-list freebsd Subject: Re: net/3proxy: a fix to commit Message-ID: <20160824044329.GT96200@home.opsec.eu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 04:43:31 -0000 Hi! > can anybody have a look and commit it if possible? > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209463 Done. Thanks! -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 24 09:15:29 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58801BC105B for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 09:15:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: from mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [IPv6:2001:aa8:fffb:1::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "0x20.net", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 DV Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20AB21BB0 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 09:15:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [IPv6:2001:aa8:fffb:1::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.0x20.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C6096E0081; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:15:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id u7O9FQFS020507; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:15:26 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: (from lars@localhost) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id u7O9FQAb019615; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:15:26 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lars) Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:15:25 +0200 From: Lars Engels To: =?utf-8?B?UmHDumw=?= Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem with net-mgmt/icinga2 upgrading from 2.4.10 to 2.5.1 (r420729) Message-ID: <20160824091525.GV18643@e-new.0x20.net> References: <1d0d6326-213d-228a-38d1-e546ea53543a@b2n.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RRAIye3QNVdtSBls" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1d0d6326-213d-228a-38d1-e546ea53543a@b2n.org> X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.4 X-Operation-System: FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE-p23 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 09:15:29 -0000 --RRAIye3QNVdtSBls Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 09:08:48PM +0200, Ra=C3=BAl wrote: > Hello! >=20 > grateful for the great work on the ports > I don't remember last problem upgrading with them, Awesome! > just a little setback >=20 > upgraded using portmaster, everything went apparently fine > followed pkg-message to update schema db as I use mysql, also fine > but when I try to start it I got: >=20 > [....] > # service icinga2 start > Performing sanity check of icinga2 configuration:=20 > /usr/local/lib/icinga2/libcli.so: Undefined symbol=20 > "_ZN6icinga14ConfigCompiler15CollectIncludesERNSt3__16vectorIPNS_10Expres= sionENS1_9allocatorIS4_EEEERKNS_6StringESB_SB_" > FAILED > [....] >=20 > Not sure if I'm alone here. >=20 > this box runs 10.3-RELEASE-p6 and make.conf contains >=20 > [....] > INSTALL_NODEBUG=3D"YES" > OPTIONS_UNSET=3DX11 > OPTIONS_UNSET=3DGUI > BATCH=3DYES > FORCE_PKG_REGISTER=3Dyes > WITH_PKGNG=3Dyes ^^^^ you can savely remove this > #WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=3Dyes > DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=3D ssl=3Dopenssl > [....] Do you have the output from portmaster? --RRAIye3QNVdtSBls Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJXvWWtXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ4RjQwMDE3RTRERjUzMTI1N0FGRTUxNDlF NTRDQjM3RDNBMDg5RDZEAAoJEOVMs306CJ1tzw4H/jepf+DHxImWlUJaDpJXGbM4 MQf8i5cA83qZD6RgotQM1oxpfOSGtBIUQPW3H0Q9iNq4Um3YFJbLHor+MGYB7nqa A9k8YQRDR9qjoiF7J6h1RRI1Fko83PWV6h4+/lU5k9X/yJH2UTR45CREdXA0c2UW YNG/2RhNbHUnGyy+3T5pCBq8m0qDwny1fK13jgjBvL/TUjxU2mCyEF1I89y6kwPQ q5eh5KOgjGowr3lTB++Ec/mtUtwJMhMdIlraAxcBwq++sUTr5IHj89p6Z3PN6X1p 3tLWZgN1hnchy6iDGLes/GF54bbEp4qxY2O2xkfzPijdfFHPQjnLAcRzcmd6eY4= =4LZL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RRAIye3QNVdtSBls-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 24 09:51:35 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF5ECBC1EA9 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 09:51:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1DF180F for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 09:51:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id CC795BC1EA7; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 09:51:35 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9D15BC1EA5 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 09:51:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD5F3180E for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 09:51:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u7O9pZPH002117 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 09:51:35 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u7O9pZWw002116; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 09:51:35 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201608240951.u7O9pZWw002116@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 09:51:35 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 09:51:36 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ textproc/elasticsearch-plugin-marvel | 1.3.1 | 2.4.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 24 10:05:32 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19AABBBE761 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 10:05:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raul@b2n.org) Received: from mail1.isdefe.es (mail1.isdefe.es [194.15.213.239]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D03D412A0 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 10:05:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raul@b2n.org) Received: from turing.b2n.org (unknown [172.24.1.14]) by mail1.isdefe.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id DED1F2BAC1D; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 12:05:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by turing.b2n.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C4CA35E20D; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 12:05:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 204.152.158.146.dynamic.jazztel.es (204.152.158.146.dynamic.jazztel.es [146.158.152.204]) by turing.b2n.org (Horde Framework) with HTTPS; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 12:05:29 +0200 Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 12:05:29 +0200 Message-ID: <20160824120529.Horde.Ffvqjf169RScEaRBbte5UTe@turing.b2n.org> From: Raul To: Lars Engels Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem with net-mgmt/icinga2 upgrading from 2.4.10 to 2.5.1 (r420729) References: <1d0d6326-213d-228a-38d1-e546ea53543a@b2n.org> <20160824091525.GV18643@e-new.0x20.net> In-Reply-To: <20160824091525.GV18643@e-new.0x20.net> User-Agent: Horde Application Framework 5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 10:05:32 -0000 Lars Engels escribió: >> WITH_PKGNG=yes > ^^^^ you can savely remove this Removed, thanks! > Do you have the output from portmaster? https://turing.b2n.org/owncloud/index.php/s/zmFcqMX8EHEpJRl Thanks a lot in advance. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 24 10:12:45 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE2BABBED20 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 10:12:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from taro-2.utanet.at (taro.utanet.at [IPv6:2001:938:1337:25::25:45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EAC81A10 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 10:12:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=utanet.at; s=rev1; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:Subject:References:To; bh=ZQochDFJLyeQd0oyDFmgEO+V/jljQtjfnzmYaKu74vI=; b=XVDwcE3suiA+EqTxyL3esHdxtNWBGfLrkjhz8P/QmQ7hZXlrlCGcsOP8P8KoS6HUeI2mEJKHpe3LwAWEkqnF3/CZRM4p5NvqsRrBiPYMtRY/bqa2MdVzRvjFLJA2HsBxYD5UEZQRsxhWoO8ACNOy/sj6yDI6I1aNN5gPjYMNE4c=; Received: from paris.xoc.tele2net.at ([213.90.36.7]) by taro.utanet.at with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1bcVAp-0002U5-D2 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 12:12:43 +0200 Received: from 91-115-91-219.adsl.highway.telekom.at ([91.115.91.219] helo=[10.0.0.93]) by paris.xoc.tele2net.at with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1bcVAp-0003az-B5 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 12:12:43 +0200 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <1d0d6326-213d-228a-38d1-e546ea53543a@b2n.org> Subject: Re: problem with net-mgmt/icinga2 upgrading from 2.4.10 to 2.5.1 (r420729) From: Walter Schwarzenfeld Message-ID: Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 12:12:42 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1d0d6326-213d-228a-38d1-e546ea53543a@b2n.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 10:12:46 -0000 This error message does not appear if I install devel/libcli. But then: Performing sanity check of icinga2 configuration: /usr/local/lib/icinga2/libremote.so: Undefined symbol "_ZTVN6icinga18GetScopeExpressionE" FAILED From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 24 10:17:01 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E41F2BBEEB3 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 10:17:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raul@b2n.org) Received: from mail1.isdefe.es (mail1.isdefe.es [194.15.213.239]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A359A1D2E for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 10:17:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raul@b2n.org) Received: from turing.b2n.org (unknown [172.24.1.14]) by mail1.isdefe.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D31A2BAC7E for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 12:17:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by turing.b2n.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A1CA35E20D for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 12:17:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 204.152.158.146.dynamic.jazztel.es (204.152.158.146.dynamic.jazztel.es [146.158.152.204]) by turing.b2n.org (Horde Framework) with HTTPS; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 12:17:00 +0200 Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 12:17:00 +0200 Message-ID: <20160824121700.Horde.uwf38ZYXT--Ct4xC0SiqKnt@turing.b2n.org> From: Raul To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem with net-mgmt/icinga2 upgrading from 2.4.10 to 2.5.1 (r420729) References: <1d0d6326-213d-228a-38d1-e546ea53543a@b2n.org> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Horde Application Framework 5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 10:17:02 -0000 Walter Schwarzenfeld escribió: > This error message does not appear if I install devel/libcli. > But then: Same here. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 24 10:46:41 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 526F8BC3C54 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 10:46:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: from mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [IPv6:2001:aa8:fffb:1::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "0x20.net", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 DV Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 175701C92 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 10:46:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [IPv6:2001:aa8:fffb:1::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.0x20.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6A9E6E0081; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 12:46:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id u7OAkciw078463; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 12:46:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: (from lars@localhost) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id u7OAkblf078043; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 12:46:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lars) Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 12:46:37 +0200 From: Lars Engels To: Raul Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem with net-mgmt/icinga2 upgrading from 2.4.10 to 2.5.1 (r420729) Message-ID: <20160824104637.GW18643@e-new.0x20.net> References: <1d0d6326-213d-228a-38d1-e546ea53543a@b2n.org> <20160824121700.Horde.uwf38ZYXT--Ct4xC0SiqKnt@turing.b2n.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="tkNMN34SQOq6NafI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160824121700.Horde.uwf38ZYXT--Ct4xC0SiqKnt@turing.b2n.org> X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.4 X-Operation-System: FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE-p23 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 10:46:41 -0000 --tkNMN34SQOq6NafI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 12:17:00PM +0200, Raul wrote: >=20 > Walter Schwarzenfeld escribi=C3=B3: >=20 > > This error message does not appear if I install devel/libcli. > > But then: >=20 > Same here. =46rom your portmaster logfile: =3D=3D=3D> icinga2-2.5.1 depends on shared library: libconfig.so - found = (/usr/local/lib/libconfig.so) Can you try to-rebuild libconfig and then icinga2 again? --tkNMN34SQOq6NafI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJXvXsNXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ4RjQwMDE3RTRERjUzMTI1N0FGRTUxNDlF NTRDQjM3RDNBMDg5RDZEAAoJEOVMs306CJ1tV10IAKK6/bzhQgR+RmqxKOt+Zxf9 VEgtfazRJE+FkKU5VU1fH9uWACzK/HqlGoAu96jL8eQjn74Gn+9SzHP3ZyzLrnoB bAtZ4YJINoi2pmLzhIlTvWGmxOheQb5TymYsswXgQ4msk7WIZy+Na/5WkgqNSADz DVVqOoznQESZr1auXDwfRwRb8N6wwSQqPNf1ANqbeJ6L9ci93sGvCwZiRzB9y3Gn HvkU2KIlhKr40SH0Owem+Chfui6KNTPJvY3ovUIsYy2MBGnCT3BcRMVxDb5t0odz QUjYnxeq/I4IYcV/p8CgioeYnvAPRHd4BWFdx0RXg+jmHou4QZZej+02QBLMnZo= =SscP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --tkNMN34SQOq6NafI-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 24 11:03:14 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F85FBC41C1 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:03:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raul@b2n.org) Received: from mail1.isdefe.es (mail1.isdefe.es [194.15.213.239]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6039D1925 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:03:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raul@b2n.org) Received: from turing.b2n.org (unknown [172.24.1.14]) by mail1.isdefe.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id B855931674B; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 13:03:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by turing.b2n.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39E1935E20D; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 13:03:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 204.152.158.146.dynamic.jazztel.es (204.152.158.146.dynamic.jazztel.es [146.158.152.204]) by turing.b2n.org (Horde Framework) with HTTPS; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 13:03:12 +0200 Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 13:03:12 +0200 Message-ID: <20160824130312.Horde.aNkO2TDZxNItpxbrQ7XGgv1@turing.b2n.org> From: Raul To: Lars Engels Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem with net-mgmt/icinga2 upgrading from 2.4.10 to 2.5.1 (r420729) References: <1d0d6326-213d-228a-38d1-e546ea53543a@b2n.org> <20160824121700.Horde.uwf38ZYXT--Ct4xC0SiqKnt@turing.b2n.org> <20160824104637.GW18643@e-new.0x20.net> In-Reply-To: <20160824104637.GW18643@e-new.0x20.net> User-Agent: Horde Application Framework 5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:03:14 -0000 Lars Engels escribió: >>> This error message does not appear if I install devel/libcli. > Can you try to-rebuild libconfig and then icinga2 again? sure still, no changes [....] # service icinga2 restart Performing sanity check of icinga2 configuration: /usr/local/lib/icinga2/libremote.so: Undefined symbol "_ZTVN6icinga18GetScopeExpressionE" FAILED [....] From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 24 11:20:46 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1E36BC49CA for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:20:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from taro-2.utanet.at (taro.utanet.at [IPv6:2001:938:1337:25::25:45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 907E41396 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:20:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=utanet.at; s=rev1; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:Subject:References:To; bh=7HAkrfEX7tA/5Ei4fbYEEWv9D+QoIDiBCtd5/Z9p4z8=; b=PJisdlBS8ppOgzQf3JTW5LnDfu9cAmZksnIGMgRrs2FYvVS+696Uxl326XPMDJ4Arlf8EBeR1mKZruQEDYrVZ+5YAcRLuvyJjB3oD/aU8G8ZnhrxKPIhppPNKRmyh3mt2bFu2OW8M+8tX3MyrGG/MG7JpzfA0c+F8QyIvhcddZg=; Received: from pam.xoc.tele2net.at ([213.90.36.6]) by taro.utanet.at with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1bcWEZ-0008Np-UI for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 13:20:39 +0200 Received: from 91-115-91-219.adsl.highway.telekom.at ([91.115.91.219] helo=[10.0.0.93]) by pam.xoc.tele2net.at with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1bcWEZ-0000zm-SQ for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 13:20:39 +0200 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20160824130312.Horde.aNkO2TDZxNItpxbrQ7XGgv1@turing.b2n.org> Subject: Re: problem with net-mgmt/icinga2 upgrading from 2.4.10 to 2.5.1 (r420729) From: Walter Schwarzenfeld Message-ID: Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 13:20:39 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160824130312.Horde.aNkO2TDZxNItpxbrQ7XGgv1@turing.b2n.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:20:46 -0000 Cause I only had a quick look in it, I have not configured it, but if I remove USESßssl It seems to start (So I have eror messages, but it seems they are only of missing cofiguration). Please, test it. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 24 11:24:45 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED46FBC4B75 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:24:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from taro-2.utanet.at (taro.utanet.at [IPv6:2001:938:1337:25::25:45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF4AB16F1 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:24:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=utanet.at; s=rev1; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:Subject:References:To; bh=RtGhWKypvgpWSCkUBvPu8w0KGrOILf6Psh4LWX0y+ds=; b=pp5+XGAWoWE1h1JjAZRTCRRQl4WiSLdVUEhiXcHhOaLt4UvUVXsom5XgJ5/OR7UU9wZLcRqRoQPcrHQjWzwAUOjSF7A2dAQtqo8mHP2nR6B3sfdKTF7bPMubfQcsdOfrU38JQHbpIZwNpF1V5c1PQS/gw8ijH8V2C2BQVUghwjk=; Received: from paris.xoc.tele2net.at ([213.90.36.7]) by taro.utanet.at with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1bcWIV-0001P8-GE for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 13:24:43 +0200 Received: from 91-115-91-219.adsl.highway.telekom.at ([91.115.91.219] helo=[10.0.0.93]) by paris.xoc.tele2net.at with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1bcWIV-0001YS-EX for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 13:24:43 +0200 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: Subject: Re: problem with net-mgmt/icinga2 upgrading from 2.4.10 to 2.5.1 (r420729) From: Walter Schwarzenfeld Message-ID: <4940d03b-7fe3-d9fd-feb2-fc44f8d3596c@utanet.at> Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 13:24:41 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:24:46 -0000 Forgot to mention, I have libressl as default, maybe this causes the problem. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 24 12:45:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA73BC40C6 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 12:45:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raul@b2n.org) Received: from mail1.isdefe.es (mail1.isdefe.es [194.15.213.239]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0F9B1258 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 12:45:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raul@b2n.org) Received: from turing.b2n.org (unknown [172.24.1.14]) by mail1.isdefe.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 375612BAA7A; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 14:36:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by turing.b2n.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00E2F35E20D; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 14:36:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 204.152.158.146.dynamic.jazztel.es (204.152.158.146.dynamic.jazztel.es [146.158.152.204]) by turing.b2n.org (Horde Framework) with HTTPS; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 14:36:24 +0200 Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 14:36:24 +0200 Message-ID: <20160824143624.Horde.NT5BqEyKUiBNepU_sfAxcJs@turing.b2n.org> From: Raul To: Walter Schwarzenfeld Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem with net-mgmt/icinga2 upgrading from 2.4.10 to 2.5.1 (r420729) References: <20160824130312.Horde.aNkO2TDZxNItpxbrQ7XGgv1@turing.b2n.org> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Horde Application Framework 5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 12:45:49 -0000 Walter Schwarzenfeld escribió: ... > if I remove USESßssl I have openssl from ports. Removed ssl from USES and yes, starts without problem. Basic configuration here, logs are clean and icingaweb2 also likes it. Is this a PR case?. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 24 13:01:58 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E60E7BC46DE for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 13:01:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: from mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [217.69.76.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "0x20.net", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 DV Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC3191285 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 13:01:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [IPv6:2001:aa8:fffb:1::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.0x20.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5692F6E0081; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 15:01:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id u7OD1sPi092911; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 15:01:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: (from lars@localhost) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id u7OD1rO0091726; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 15:01:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lars) Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 15:01:53 +0200 From: Lars Engels To: Raul Cc: Walter Schwarzenfeld , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem with net-mgmt/icinga2 upgrading from 2.4.10 to 2.5.1 (r420729) Message-ID: <20160824130153.GY18643@e-new.0x20.net> References: <20160824130312.Horde.aNkO2TDZxNItpxbrQ7XGgv1@turing.b2n.org> <20160824143624.Horde.NT5BqEyKUiBNepU_sfAxcJs@turing.b2n.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mk7Ps+pDEXam0KAP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160824143624.Horde.NT5BqEyKUiBNepU_sfAxcJs@turing.b2n.org> X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.4 X-Operation-System: FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE-p23 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 13:01:59 -0000 --mk7Ps+pDEXam0KAP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 02:36:24PM +0200, Raul wrote: >=20 > Walter Schwarzenfeld escribi=C3=B3: >=20 > ... > > if I remove USES=C3=9Fssl >=20 > I have openssl from ports. >=20 > Removed ssl from USES and yes, starts without problem. > Basic configuration here, logs are clean and icingaweb2 also likes it. Strange. Thank you both for your observations! >=20 > Is this a PR case?. No, I am the maintainer of the Icinga ports. :)=20 I'll try to find out why this happens. --mk7Ps+pDEXam0KAP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJXvZrBXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ4RjQwMDE3RTRERjUzMTI1N0FGRTUxNDlF NTRDQjM3RDNBMDg5RDZEAAoJEOVMs306CJ1tOjwH/2qD/0Q745/hDaYAGLCvLWPm VsJOu9jsTUcwvv+xZ6lLg/IFDWCN2294xVEt1uf9aqFsHU69UCQR5AkktKU6ZbFu OOI8eFEl9Hb7AT+8WsDkyIZ+Bsfz+0lmJ85NYRgFvDVbwqtjLZn234BIjqF9E5I8 wCfjhkM8htW5GwAwUAculDwjdzi9LpyB3lDcvYdccpfAA/5Pwxkogr55f64wU91N pSKiwyo53vMz0XSG71kkg9SbUI+fqGJInVlsI7VR9zIRk6QaU9a6mNECcqluyBXJ j+Mgnop3dSDcZbycAPWthVMP+mq/P0LwZelcdK/5nrsZgXEIegV5sGRJZVdQdIo= =D8E5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mk7Ps+pDEXam0KAP-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 24 13:12:08 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 348A1BC4BEA for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 13:12:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: from mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [217.69.76.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "0x20.net", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 DV Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE5F3191C for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 13:12:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [IPv6:2001:aa8:fffb:1::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.0x20.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCDF26E0081; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 15:12:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id u7ODC5Uh084074; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 15:12:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: (from lars@localhost) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id u7ODC5X8083077; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 15:12:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lars) Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 15:12:05 +0200 From: Lars Engels To: Lars Engels Cc: Raul , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Walter Schwarzenfeld Subject: Re: problem with net-mgmt/icinga2 upgrading from 2.4.10 to 2.5.1 (r420729) Message-ID: <20160824131205.GZ18643@e-new.0x20.net> References: <20160824130312.Horde.aNkO2TDZxNItpxbrQ7XGgv1@turing.b2n.org> <20160824143624.Horde.NT5BqEyKUiBNepU_sfAxcJs@turing.b2n.org> <20160824130153.GY18643@e-new.0x20.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="w8QetmdSDwT395M8" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160824130153.GY18643@e-new.0x20.net> X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.4 X-Operation-System: FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE-p23 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 13:12:08 -0000 --w8QetmdSDwT395M8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 03:01:53PM +0200, Lars Engels wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 02:36:24PM +0200, Raul wrote: > >=20 > > Walter Schwarzenfeld escribi=C3=B3: > >=20 > > ... > > > if I remove USES=C3=9Fssl > >=20 > > I have openssl from ports. > >=20 > > Removed ssl from USES and yes, starts without problem. > > Basic configuration here, logs are clean and icingaweb2 also likes it. >=20 > Strange. Thank you both for your observations! > >=20 > > Is this a PR case?. >=20 > No, I am the maintainer of the Icinga ports. :)=20 > I'll try to find out why this happens. I do not have *ssl from ports installed, so Icinga 2 uses the SSL version from base. That's why it works for me. --w8QetmdSDwT395M8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJXvZ0lXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ4RjQwMDE3RTRERjUzMTI1N0FGRTUxNDlF NTRDQjM3RDNBMDg5RDZEAAoJEOVMs306CJ1ti+MIAJnP+I4VgyTGeIoE+zdzia8U 9PadUuy/yf0lGslOy6W2S/CtkV+bFsxp5Jf3tWDn8Z7T/NgezdRuKvrr406XWYBk 9fbfhW6XclQRv2MlhvyCoXZAcVhzBgojWS+wCWA6UHWASPg3dyVg/LZCN6fITokn ZEyDUhLopKXdWa3o91oy0yFKgKXSZedjp8erfkWiNikvHF5njngURwwsajHVgdAP W/vgIS/F5DW3J6xRlG1n3yU7IxLbrNKJo335Bvv6NeKKEcmDnTDA0R5jnUJgQ/pd xv6VZV8jAMHiXZvgAouMtFUYH7QVzFE+o+dz42+o0fQ0HoxLz5vhMEBZsi5NSbk= =zhNl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --w8QetmdSDwT395M8-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 24 13:38:34 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90DB9BC453A for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 13:38:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from anny.lostinspace.de (anny.lostinspace.de [IPv6:2001:608:a02::33]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5479E18CE for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 13:38:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from idefix@fechner.net) Received: from server.idefix.lan (aftr-185-17-205-177.dynamic.mnet-online.de [185.17.205.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: idefix@fechner.net) by anny.lostinspace.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2D62953127C for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 15:38:31 +0200 (CEST) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.1 anny.lostinspace.de 2D62953127C Authentication-Results: anny.lostinspace.de; dmarc=none header.from=fechner.net DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=fechner.net; s=default; t=1472045911; bh=u5NM0OIccYTUL2R3E6lIY9i525sMj5Q76FXiS1kYy6Y=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=ph1tDIIfwBlZl+kgQTc1xwYhK/bAvbuBHByNrvSwizX+x2Q1vs/l7uyHxK0akHpug qhct76y/7pV0xKGDwRy8vY8PghJxJf++wK9D1fvl/XLWVp9PhXCSWuCj5vUjlbHF30 GaB9veWkSsuXSgxa4DLED7+FOE6DspZqTb3sS78s= Received: from [192.168.0.151] (aftr-185-17-205-177.dynamic.mnet-online.de [185.17.205.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.idefix.lan (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9FA24533413 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 15:38:30 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: problem with net-mgmt/icinga2 upgrading from 2.4.10 to 2.5.1 (r420729) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20160824130312.Horde.aNkO2TDZxNItpxbrQ7XGgv1@turing.b2n.org> <20160824143624.Horde.NT5BqEyKUiBNepU_sfAxcJs@turing.b2n.org> <20160824130153.GY18643@e-new.0x20.net> <20160824131205.GZ18643@e-new.0x20.net> From: Matthias Fechner Message-ID: Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 15:38:26 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160824131205.GZ18643@e-new.0x20.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 13:38:34 -0000 Dear all, Am 24.08.2016 um 15:12 schrieb Lars Engels: > I do not have *ssl from ports installed, so Icinga 2 uses the SSL > version from base. That's why it works for me. I face the exact same problem. I think SSL is required if you want to talk to icinga installation on other hosts? I personally require SSL from ports as the base SSL cannot do alpn. But as the old 2.4.10 version worked fine with SSL port from ports, there must be a change upstream that breaks compatibility with OpenSSL 1.0.2h? Gru=C3=9F Matthias --=20 "Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the universe is winning." -- Rich Cook From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 24 16:04:17 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 916B1BC4DF0 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 16:04:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-lists@gromit.dlib.vt.edu) Received: from gromit.dlib.vt.edu (gromit.dlib.vt.edu [128.173.126.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gromit.dlib.vt.edu", Issuer "Chumby Certificate Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 726BA15E8 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 16:04:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-lists@gromit.dlib.vt.edu) Received: from pmather.lib.vt.edu (pmather.lib.vt.edu [128.173.126.193]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gromit.dlib.vt.edu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E116282 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:54:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Paul Mather Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: net-p2p/deluge now generates "ioctl sign-extension ioctl ffffffffc0206933" warnings Message-Id: <8ACCBC46-ECDD-4E6E-B0BB-6FC63D987DB7@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 11:54:34 -0400 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 16:04:17 -0000 I updated my FreeBSD/amd64 10-STABLE system yesterday to r304677. Ever = since, /usr/local/bin/deluged from the net-p2p/deluge port has been = generating these messages in my system logs: WARNING pid 54659 (python2.7): ioctl sign-extension ioctl = ffffffffc0206933 I rebuilt and reinstalled the port after the update just to make sure, = but the errors still appear. Has anyone else experienced this? Like I said, this only started = happening for me when I updated my system to r304677. :-( Cheers, Paul.= From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 24 19:08:31 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8826EBC59D7 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:08:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it0-x22f.google.com (mail-it0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5064A13E5 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:08:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id f6so51329862ith.0 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 12:08:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=LyRecWnTTjp9Bie+m++LImsSKL+hnDDcsXOOSkVWdoI=; b=xy4RNV0cc1vHaPH+JoedxVvPqNqIQ39IFL3S2N8Bb3nnRW3NIiFXM4Nd2JHnAwOqhx rxzDSORPynfH2GN7XAUmPt5i2ivhWD8EV8HrCxGZtB22EhesnLUQENCLYjwpdYvlJDbK qYCGjsNhcBdFSanaaER+w8HFN+OsV0xGA4J8bwn6WT45G7RYBWrc1CuswDqKeDwr57PM cdgJDg8PzoigSBuRQR399Kr943bGAOMXkNYUjx4trJJvZOiKwCFN1QEXLUtQfsROr2nX jUG8VzpbCC1T4BLdk+EKEWKlLwImj/RIGNIGQU/AN6i8CSL8W5eFh/paRztZejvMwdmq ZVTw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=LyRecWnTTjp9Bie+m++LImsSKL+hnDDcsXOOSkVWdoI=; b=S0bthH2P33usYhXC9giX9Y5dFgbcZ1jb423KmQOxMY3M7aUHOWaUBH6W4p5sVPnhLs hz1OPdNx0CztErc6DSc5mDlKGqy93JVePdCfiWjE8BdXIae8Z4OslaHQL+Kqz7csnAYx lSpBrwLFiRgYYVJ5eXWzx4Nvv82OERv1bdiBB5VLQ+YaXHSeEaDveExugNo3fm/TmRFN rpwn09aeECu2WCi1pwRbvCoMXfSmlUdLRv7a/cidn9OvBaMZVksD3UwIPH62VFhbUFUQ JnfuWe3KIq3hNb/WnOoCKfh0xRm2kkUddxmnpwTyweyegcP/cQIO6bIgDlQJvunLl0p1 PCVQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoousTT2dxxncfaxWKv+TApHIvg2i9rqx0RJHmVWute0lqan6i+/hgiLGDuUFK/lO/eRTWQ7ZKdiyWBwIJlw== X-Received: by 10.36.219.65 with SMTP id c62mr580693itg.44.1472065710742; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 12:08:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.79.109.198 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 12:08:30 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8ACCBC46-ECDD-4E6E-B0BB-6FC63D987DB7@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> References: <8ACCBC46-ECDD-4E6E-B0BB-6FC63D987DB7@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> From: Kevin Oberman Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 12:08:30 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 5mITkLV2AhElKwUVbZOCz-udrEc Message-ID: Subject: Re: net-p2p/deluge now generates "ioctl sign-extension ioctl ffffffffc0206933" warnings To: Paul Mather Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:08:31 -0000 On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 8:54 AM, Paul Mather < freebsd-lists@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> wrote: > I updated my FreeBSD/amd64 10-STABLE system yesterday to r304677. Ever > since, /usr/local/bin/deluged from the net-p2p/deluge port has been > generating these messages in my system logs: > > WARNING pid 54659 (python2.7): ioctl sign-extension ioctl ffffffffc0206933 > > > I rebuilt and reinstalled the port after the update just to make sure, but > the errors still appear. > > Has anyone else experienced this? Like I said, this only started > happening for me when I updated my system to r304677. :-( > > Cheers, > > Paul. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I think it's a known issue. I recall a discussion of this a few months ago, but I still get the message from time to time. IIRC, it's python related, as the message indicates. Note: It is not deluge that causes the error as I don't have it installed on my system and I see the message in my /var/log/messages now and then. Not sure if I have seen it since I installed 11-STABLE, but saw it on 10.3. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 24 19:27:42 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49A77BC50C1 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:27:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brnrd@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F4221482 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:27:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brnrd@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 2B436BC50C0; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:27:42 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28AFFBC50BF for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:27:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brnrd@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp01.qsp.nl (smtp01.qsp.nl [193.254.214.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C4B41481; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:27:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brnrd@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp01.qsp.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp01.qsp.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A3612A0D54; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 21:18:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.brnrd.eu (unknown [193.164.217.85]) by smtp01.qsp.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 21:18:15 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=brnrd.eu; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id; s=default; bh=xKbAeFfaRwItygiNCx0JA8id1fOHK179DNgZq4xF3R8=; b=P1BwtN7m1d0tf4EWGpCpsf0PD/i9tLlZQnpLgdLAg4ls4e2klc7x0Zub0IjsyiSUIvvTxr82hC4KHIDb2hfIkv4mHIe5vqvhGHn2bs2JOKKfwgJRL7ucpUWgWMtQAdHDnf0jq4BxkxkuVAiozafq4bVZbWAlcQo53KyIuImAp2WouRzOxQQaP18GDO7m4OBm/3H5mPR0T7+GxNhM9Bf8n9WTqR/txCY+F6C4npei7CmmZLPYTQkoTGdR08+3z7GJKSm8hpvKDQYTe8tdYqzFykOJMjpI3+qRIqIeuQF+BcH/3AdSYJS5+6q0o6sHqJANUp9zxGESyDgSueA2X4akEg== Received: by bachfreund.nl (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id a87c895e TLS version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 21:18:14 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 21:18:14 +0200 From: Bernard Spil To: Matt Smith , Mathieu Arnold , Bernard Spil , ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upcoming OpenSSL 1.1.0 release In-Reply-To: <20160823124201.GB48814@xtaz.uk> References: <6d35459045985929d061f3c6cca85efe@imap.brnrd.eu> <0E328A9485C47045F93C19AB@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20160823124201.GB48814@xtaz.uk> Message-ID: X-Sender: brnrd@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.0 X-SMTP-Virus-Scanned: clamav at smtp01 X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.7 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED, HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM, HK_RANDOM_FROM,T_DKIM_INVALID,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=disabled version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on svfilter04.qsp.nl X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:27:42 -0000 On 2016-08-23 14:42, Matt Smith wrote: > On Aug 22 20:39, Mathieu Arnold wrote: >> ports-committers is a *NEVER POST DIRECTLY TO* list, so, moving it to >> ports@ where this belongs a lot more. >> >> +--On 22 août 2016 20:30:15 +0200 Bernard Spil >> wrote: >> | Curious to know how we should procede with the upgrade of the >> OpenSSL >> | port to 1.1.0! >> >> All ports need to work with it, I'm sure software like BIND9 do not >> build >> with it. >> >> -- Mathieu Arnold > > Going slightly off-topic, I'm curious what the opinion is around this > and LibreSSL. My understanding is that LibreSSL was forked from OpenSSL > 1.0.1 and they have not backported newer stuff from OpenSSL. I also > believe OpenSSL now has several full time paid developers working on it > and that the 1.1 release has some significant changes under the hood? > > I've been using LibreSSL for a while so that I can get chacha20 support > but OpenSSL 1.1 will not only have chacha20, but will also have x25519 > support as well. This along with what I said above is making me think > it > might be better to go back to OpenSSL. > > I just wondered what people in the know think about the current > situation with these two things. Plus are there any roadmaps for the > future of FreeBSD regarding the defaults. Is the project ever going to > look at making LibreSSL the default port, or will that be kept as > OpenSSL for many years to come? I know Bernard has been looking into > that and playing around with LibreSSL in base etc. Just curious what > the > official policy is going to be on that. Hi Matt, Today new vulnerabilities with (3)DES and BlowFish were made public and I believe we'll see release of another paper which is OpenSSL 1.1 related with the release of OpenSSL 1.1.0. I have no knowledge if the paper/report contained vulnerabilities that have postponed the release of 1.1.0 but I think that is likely. That would mean that these vulnerabilities have been solved pre-release. As far as I know x25519 is still a Draft RFC so unlikely to appear in browsers for a while. I can see LibreSSL adding this as well, whether in the draft version or in the final. This they did with ChaCha20/Poly1305 as well (draft in 2.3, release in 2.4). The LibreSSL devs would have closed the request if they didn't intend to support it https://github.com/libressl-portable/portable/issues/114 I don't think that FreeBSD will be making LibreSSL the libssl/libcrypto provider any time soon. The support timelines for LibreSSL (<1.5 years) are just too short for the FreeBSD release support (>3 years). OpenSSL is speeding up the release cycle as well but at least we can rely on RedHat to backport changes to older versions. LibreSSL in base is a bit more than playing, it is becoming the default in HardenedBSD very soon and very likely in TrueOS (AKA PC-BSD) as of 11.0 RELEASE. Both HardenedBSD and TrueOS have a different attitude towards updating things in the base system as they do not serve as upstream to other projects/products that require longer support timelines. Come see my talk at EuroBSDCon, it will contain LibreSSL in base things. Cheers, Bernard. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 24 19:36:06 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6252BC5287 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:36:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@xtaz.co.uk) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE9941875 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:36:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@xtaz.co.uk) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B9F58BC5286; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:36:06 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9A0CBC5285 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:36:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@xtaz.co.uk) Received: from mail.xtaz.uk (tao.xtaz.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:fe33::10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80DB41873; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:36:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@xtaz.co.uk) Received: by mail.xtaz.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id F04B3209AF52; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 20:36:03 +0100 (BST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=xtaz.co.uk; s=mail; t=1472067364; x=1473881764; bh=n6p4X11KtHOd+KPW8r8z1IvT5TamheLlnPBMpElxi5w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=S3MNzjhCwFpWsAMYROkn4UvdPzRdDc1SHavkzEYwK5YFWqU7YwkLL+nO+Nw35NwAP WX6Dq9aCquKr9mcFGqeCauLZoYWS7gNwd48b7V38Z0aeO8n0RK7IFKVBKCksgwKFtT /CwYyX+FSDPCdH2gpVIc1vbbXHCv8oSWTOFhpWKJdBzukLO5B6to29cBvA4LosbkJn 9H/ZN5pLRQHxb0/c8KCvnfsNmTZhndLilXDfdy5o1l/UccnglnzmJcWwubogTlaZPh JzJ2x1XtZcwHHP2JaN7lVW4fO0UWlDjeH/9Qbv/DlZ+5X6n84bzlmBNzi245DyKoYY lYrycCFhpsKfA== Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 20:36:03 +0100 From: Matt Smith To: Bernard Spil Cc: Mathieu Arnold , ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upcoming OpenSSL 1.1.0 release Message-ID: <20160824193603.GA16568@xtaz.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Matt Smith , Bernard Spil , Mathieu Arnold , ports@freebsd.org References: <6d35459045985929d061f3c6cca85efe@imap.brnrd.eu> <0E328A9485C47045F93C19AB@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20160823124201.GB48814@xtaz.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:36:06 -0000 On Aug 24 21:18, Bernard Spil wrote: >Today new vulnerabilities with (3)DES and BlowFish were made public and >I believe we'll see release of another paper which is OpenSSL 1.1 >related with the release of OpenSSL 1.1.0. I have no knowledge if the >paper/report contained vulnerabilities that have postponed the release >of 1.1.0 but I think that is likely. That would mean that these >vulnerabilities have been solved pre-release. > >As far as I know x25519 is still a Draft RFC so unlikely to appear in >browsers for a while. I can see LibreSSL adding this as well, whether >in the draft version or in the final. This they did with >ChaCha20/Poly1305 as well (draft in 2.3, release in 2.4). The LibreSSL >devs would have closed the request if they didn't intend to support it >https://github.com/libressl-portable/portable/issues/114 > >I don't think that FreeBSD will be making LibreSSL the >libssl/libcrypto provider any time soon. The support timelines for >LibreSSL (<1.5 years) are just too short for the FreeBSD release >support (>3 years). OpenSSL is speeding up the release cycle as well >but at least we can rely on RedHat to backport changes to older >versions. > >LibreSSL in base is a bit more than playing, it is becoming the >default in HardenedBSD very soon and very likely in TrueOS (AKA >PC-BSD) as of 11.0 RELEASE. Both HardenedBSD and TrueOS have a >different attitude towards updating things in the base system as they >do not serve as upstream to other projects/products that require >longer support timelines. Come see my talk at EuroBSDCon, it will >contain LibreSSL in base things. > >Cheers, > >Bernard. Thanks for that reply. That answers things quite nicely. I believe x25519 is currently in chrome: https://www.ssllabs.com/ssltest/viewClient.html?name=Chrome&version=51&platform=Win%207&key=126 It has x25519 listed as an Elliptic curve near the bottom. So for that reason I am interested in enabling it as I like to do things bleeding edge! I will probably stick with security/libressl-devel for the foreseeable future though I think and at least wait and see what people make of OpenSSL 1.1 after a few months if only for the fact it's a bit of a pain to switch back again by recompiling everything. -- Matt From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 24 20:16:50 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BB86BC5DA1 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 20:16:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6105519FE for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 20:16:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 4A69DBC5DA0; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 20:16:50 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49F4BBC5D9F for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 20:16:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23EAC19ED; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 20:16:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 7C0CC33C25; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 16:08:12 -0400 (EDT) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Bernard Spil Cc: Matt Smith , Mathieu Arnold , ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upcoming OpenSSL 1.1.0 release References: <6d35459045985929d061f3c6cca85efe@imap.brnrd.eu> <0E328A9485C47045F93C19AB@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20160823124201.GB48814@xtaz.uk> Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 16:08:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Bernard Spil's message of "Wed, 24 Aug 2016 21:18:14 +0200") Message-ID: <44lgzm53rn.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 20:16:50 -0000 Bernard Spil writes: > Today new vulnerabilities with (3)DES and BlowFish were made public You're referring to something different than the HTTPS/OpenVPN attacks? Because it really wouldn't be accurate to describe those as vulnerabilities in the ciphers. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Aug 25 02:13:42 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D35BDBC57D3 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 02:13:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dimeis11@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi0-x22a.google.com (mail-oi0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 917691453 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 02:13:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dimeis11@gmail.com) Received: by mail-oi0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id l203so48999557oib.1 for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:13:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=xoBmogGTYTCqJkgZYsxAPiDFRkZK4fuBVBgl6oGDLXk=; b=Z3D58O2lzQq5h0OXWJXGMDptd5RCakOSBLgf7Jz5uTINKXGFy5rafGGSHkK7tey+UH wvGLgIT8aortYfDaKASu0HvUhJsEEcWGpCc1Ri0mAuENwz+CkJYi6EwtV1fInVj/C2bc CRbrEM/JjEED1fOLa28F5KPqfMzajsviCKtnFPW+fUFqmuQmlb7nzg4z9+ImUy2sdWTn MXdnH7vEnMvtCLcj23BOJVMiZ/YEkGMNn0ZIZjimPSpTHXlF7Y2u9teGeQ2Mh/Y1/EUy pudMJI2s+wD05Z7lDvy4Nc94Ns25fFp1bTdg0uyIc6+5yMXN5VdIX9VpcTt2QxMt0nbL 9fWw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=xoBmogGTYTCqJkgZYsxAPiDFRkZK4fuBVBgl6oGDLXk=; b=XoSY4SJ4ApsqPNI00IdEqDpO6hQxGtstCrMAMA3jd2/oXVyQ8MYT60roJdpIuOZcuk Ng71WHT6SzlIY2mTyKneyc96WoensDOYoz1o27q2ciuNZMyGN5LOO9slhR9G7JMFkhA5 J1DaCwMQq0T605Hh6b93zzy8zt9XxHIH/7m0luwYqVtfJ+Ov4U6h6skyfcd66mAdoNyK aWaeONC3mCFgkc9f4nun4mGm2tNhjtjx8tbUy33J9jXSz/DdWTkeNmkhXMvjaytKoo4L K0X8/ppd6rb2sN7xrK4HbjcT8M36H1QLNjPECSA4HNqbtTbX2X0M+H+OIDJomly0RE6+ BcSg== X-Gm-Message-State: AEkoouvd29kecE0m+J2LdUcASH7dDfDRJvtnLc7BXDfHkZ+C69yr+PAvjullpyaY/F4rwBAme50jeqmJjLRSaQ== X-Received: by 10.202.235.4 with SMTP id j4mr4828631oih.192.1472091221716; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:13:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.157.23.199 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:13:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.157.23.199 with HTTP; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 19:13:39 -0700 (PDT) From: Kaycee Cox Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 22:13:39 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Mystery shopper To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 02:13:42 -0000 Interested From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Aug 25 03:35:32 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B649FBBC117 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 03:35:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from info@trustandhire.com) Received: from server.trustandhire.com (server.trustandhire.com [148.251.142.197]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 135B617A6 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 03:35:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from info@trustandhire.com) Received: from RanjeetPSPC (unknown [103.49.235.103]) by server.trustandhire.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id EACF04881D0A for ; Wed, 24 Aug 2016 23:25:48 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=trustandhire.com; s=2072; t=1472095550; bh=Gjvb1yX3hlBWqcRGtmc9s3x/qQ4MNAE5GayBY9ulVKA=; h=Reply-To:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version: Content-Type; b=SdcuYjH4i8b1a3RsHbUbsPwbh3eiTWEB2Cic31BlPgdKsUMlu5aWczNh4XerhBjH5 VKSvNhYywy89YhSUlZkeB9Q5I5x8WySOBX4lrXwY5T9QFGuRRWmShXmkzXB6+3400D QAvEVI8jFta5t7PuQhtV9LE/movYdr7jzH7tDn2c= Reply-To: From: "Jessica" To: Subject: RE Benefits of Hiring Programmers:- Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 09:01:04 +0530 Organization: info@trustandhire.com Message-ID: <094701d1fe82$e3a96c70$aafc4550$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: AdH+QfD7BfrU0JyCQfyAOg4QNGDFLw== Content-Language: en-us Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 03:35:32 -0000 Hi, Hire Developers as per Requirements :- * iPhone Mobile Apps Developer * iPad/iPod Mobile Apps Developer * Android Mobile Apps Developer * Web Designers * Web Apps Developer * .Net Programmers * PHP Programmers * Hybrid/Native Apps Developer * SEO/SMO/PPC Developers will work on your projects on daily basis. The Web Designer or Developers would work 22 days a month (Excluding National Holidays in India) and 8 hours a day devoted on your projects. Benefits of Hiring Programmers:- It's affordable with price as low as nowhere in the market. One Programmer can work on ANY number of Projects. No Set-up Cost. No Infrastructure Cost You can treat Programmer as your own staff. Programmer will have more than 4+ years of experience in their respective field. You can connect with Programmer directly via Email ,IMs and video conferencing. Our Key Capabilities are:- * Development of Location based Applications * Bluetooth Application Solutions * Development of Social media applications and their integration * Music, Picture, Videos and other sort of media integrations * Touch screen integration and development * Development of applications as per the suitability of mobile devices and tablets * Improved veracity applications * And various others as per requirements. Do let me know if you are interested to work with us and i am sharing our past work details and client Portfolio.( http://www.appdroidsolutions.com/Portfolio.pdf.) I look forward to your mail. Thanks & Regards, Jessica Business Development Manager From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Aug 25 09:41:35 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCEF4BC5696 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 09:41:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AACF3197A for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 09:41:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id AA3A0BC5694; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 09:41:35 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9E38BC5693 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 09:41:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D87C1979 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 09:41:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u7P9fZc4024426 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 09:41:35 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u7P9fZJP024424; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 09:41:35 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201608250941.u7P9fZJP024424@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 09:41:35 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 09:41:35 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ math/giacxcas | 1.2.2-57 | 1.2.2-79 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Aug 25 14:23:31 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6874ABC55A6 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 14:23:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abi@abinet.ru) Received: from mail.abinet.ru (mail.abinet.ru [136.243.72.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC04F1B32 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 14:23:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abi@abinet.ru) Received: from sphinx.abinet.ru (host-116-152-66-217.spbmts.ru [217.66.152.116]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.abinet.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9A24225D52 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 14:23:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=abinet.ru; s=dkim; t=1472135002; bh=msheqWRI/SYO1NY4ezPqnFLkd4jcNRpZOrtqHuCnpzU=; h=Date:From:To:Subject; b=c/7Xsu2qvjwv1jwNgnP7ogebJAbekZ0cgtIv9/k/1cp/sXendmvm97qm4c/9A1CEa HubdkTtgu94QSFenh24xYoNDooY7w8sp9YU8TZPjPVj5QSlHjT0B6KlkrcjT80zQGD MIJZdkjsc82X1zxQDJxNv33XTehk2DUJJtnhNP2Q= Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 17:23:16 +0300 From: abi To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: libressl and strongswan Message-Id: <20160825172316.2e04f55c3a6066d3661c0eab@abinet.ru> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_DKIM_INVALID, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=disabled version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] * 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines * 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on postfix.abinet.ru X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 14:23:31 -0000 After I recompiled my ports with libressl support (openntpd asked for it), I have an issue with security/strongswan Or 2 issues, actually: Aug 25 17:14:59 sphinx charon: 00[LIB] plugin 'openssl' failed to load: /usr/local/lib/ipsec/plugins/libstrongswan-openssl.so: Undefined symbol "CMS_RecipientInfo_ktri_get0_signer_id" Aug 25 17:14:59 sphinx charon: 05[IKE] configured DH group MODP_3072 not supported I tried different DH groups without any success, so I suppose strongswan is broken. I read UPDATING and applied https://raw.githubusercontent.com/HardenedBSD/hardenedbsd-ports/c2091a265c9c78401cd1f4135de97590c8e7c454/security/strongswan/files/patch-src_libstrongswan_plugins_openssl_openssl__plugin.c No effect at all. Any workarounds or confirmation? Aug 25 17:14:59 sphinx charon: 00[DMN] Starting IKE charon daemon (strongSwan 5.5.0, FreeBSD 11.0-RC1, amd64) Aug 25 17:14:59 sphinx charon: 00[LIB] plugin 'openssl' failed to load: /usr/local/lib/ipsec/plugins/libstrongswan-openssl.so: Undefined symbol "CMS_RecipientInfo_ktri_get0_signer_id" Aug 25 17:14:59 sphinx charon: 00[NET] could not open socket: Address family not supported by protocol family Aug 25 17:14:59 sphinx charon: 00[NET] could not open IPv6 socket, IPv6 disabled Aug 25 17:14:59 sphinx charon: 00[CFG] loading ca certificates from '/usr/local/etc/ipsec.d/cacerts' Aug 25 17:14:59 sphinx charon: 00[LIB] building CRED_CERTIFICATE - X509 failed, tried 3 builders Aug 25 17:14:59 sphinx charon: 00[CFG] loading ca certificate from '/usr/local/etc/ipsec.d/cacerts/ipsec-ca-cert.pem' failed Aug 25 17:14:59 sphinx charon: 00[CFG] loading aa certificates from '/usr/local/etc/ipsec.d/aacerts' Aug 25 17:14:59 sphinx charon: 00[CFG] loading ocsp signer certificates from '/usr/local/etc/ipsec.d/ocspcerts' Aug 25 17:14:59 sphinx charon: 00[CFG] loading attribute certificates from '/usr/local/etc/ipsec.d/acerts' Aug 25 17:14:59 sphinx charon: 00[CFG] loading crls from '/usr/local/etc/ipsec.d/crls' Aug 25 17:14:59 sphinx charon: 00[CFG] loading secrets from '/usr/local/etc/ipsec.secrets' Aug 25 17:14:59 sphinx charon: 00[LIB] building CRED_PRIVATE_KEY - RSA failed, tried 4 builders Aug 25 17:14:59 sphinx charon: 00[CFG] loading private key from '/usr/local/etc/ipsec.d/private/ipsec-sphinx-key.pem' failed Aug 25 17:14:59 sphinx charon: 00[LIB] loaded plugins: charon aes des blowfish rc2 sha2 sha1 md4 md5 random nonce x509 revocation constraints pubkey pkcs1 pkcs7 pkcs8 pkcs12 pgp dnskey sshkey pem fips-prf xcbc cmac hmac attr kernel-pfkey kernel-pfroute resolve socket-default stroke updown eap-identity eap-md5 eap-mschapv2 eap-tls eap-ttls eap-peap whitelist addrblock Aug 25 17:14:59 sphinx charon: 00[JOB] spawning 16 worker threads Aug 25 17:14:59 sphinx ipsec_starter[96396]: charon (96397) started after 20 ms Aug 25 17:14:59 sphinx charon: 01[CFG] received stroke: add connection 'abinet' Aug 25 17:14:59 sphinx charon: 01[LIB] building CRED_CERTIFICATE - ANY failed, tried 1 builders Aug 25 17:14:59 sphinx charon: 01[CFG] loading certificate from 'ipsec-sphinx-cert.pem' failed Aug 25 17:14:59 sphinx charon: 01[CFG] added configuration 'abinet' Aug 25 17:14:59 sphinx charon: 05[CFG] received stroke: initiate 'abinet' Aug 25 17:14:59 sphinx charon: 05[IKE] initiating IKE_SA abinet[1] to xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Aug 25 17:14:59 sphinx charon: 05[IKE] configured DH group MODP_3072 not supported Aug 25 17:14:59 sphinx charon: 05[MGR] tried to checkin and delete nonexisting IKE_SA -- abi From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Aug 25 14:42:06 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF3D8BC5BDE for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 14:42:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from host64.kissl.de (host64.kissl.de [213.239.241.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "*.shmhost.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97E141579; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 14:42:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from francos-mbp.homeoffice.local (ipservice-092-208-160-166.092.208.pools.vodafone-ip.de [92.208.160.166]) (Authenticated sender: web104p1) by host64.kissl.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 76F486B7DB; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 16:34:50 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: libressl and strongswan From: Franco Fichtner In-Reply-To: <20160825172316.2e04f55c3a6066d3661c0eab@abinet.ru> Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 16:34:49 +0200 Cc: freebsd-ports , Bernard Spil Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <198ED4B0-0BCF-4453-B7E4-0C8541FD955E@lastsummer.de> References: <20160825172316.2e04f55c3a6066d3661c0eab@abinet.ru> To: abi X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at host64.kissl.de X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 14:42:06 -0000 Hi, > On 25 Aug 2016, at 4:23 PM, abi wrote: >=20 > I tried different DH groups without any success, so I suppose = strongswan is broken. I can confirm this, the only workarounds I have seen so far are = reverting to LibreSSL 2.3.7 or compiling it against base if your LibreSSL is locked = in. Maybe this is simply an issue of incomplete adaption of strongSwan to LIBRESSL_VERSION_NUMBER? Cheers, Franco= From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Aug 25 15:12:33 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23754BC63A7 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 15:12:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carol.moore@databaseb2bhub.space) Received: from mail-pa0-x229.google.com (mail-pa0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E068C19CB for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 15:12:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carol.moore@databaseb2bhub.space) Received: by mail-pa0-x229.google.com with SMTP id ti13so17763913pac.0 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 08:12:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=databaseb2bhub-space.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:to:from:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=Vthry63JKI9eGuiSckghp26XiIbcUrfGLEsdIQU6xPs=; b=z3r/SrTjcJ8VbM5Xeo75wdsRyl/7WBCKtDl1Rc47slrpjs4dIOePDzLyfO72Ylksh9 KGdIZusbU2C0OkLUH/aNpfLQCh0gp1RfvmGN8KSfDbmn4KUpHIAv9kk1UHqYFvFtDsiC R8n4fF0Hdlmla+eL2XiyNTtAMLdlb5zBSshtp99luNE+r8mNUd7oIyuRwr/Cu8bSA4hV Shm2XaNkAKxHzVtfddoaSQWgwZSgSLhIySJtfiI1AF5GEhqSoqNif+5PX5zFiG7EMwyQ U3fa2OFRF98HID3gf8cUhmbayDJIrZoGWOTvS5DwSIAJoHQAPwnO/cu6ZAJSMERKoych kFqA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:date:to:from:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=Vthry63JKI9eGuiSckghp26XiIbcUrfGLEsdIQU6xPs=; b=Rhq1fY6uMqQtxiGMBGnjvC4gfplJdpIfAshUu+jQPBvdywQKG4pltZ+hjrTWt9ybEv DhyTKnLYIYjI4AJeK4b7PQptq0gSffikKMknwtBOWkXw60hKBnRhOoY2ZyuzjgRsH/Oz Az+UKcZVq6U646NzTChyWnXCdkYvOaZd9D5XIz+Tl29/qzcwblKfCaJysfAxZCQPqHI5 +i7Oe4c4Wk9f7lFFfPP6g+O1aV9t646qar6ENRLlHjdqq5JlVdeProZLRYvFBJhZZ6xH hCBf484NcCp30q7zsv5X+Z4accxw9Azm+rapKmg+dJbFdgE7D/m2Kb9LPCvyJfz9AVb8 T1mg== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwMiBD5i+/T7WFtJvY72nOJMuj6jXmF6nRsTAQkPiLzdoMPVEFCCXAKv9SDYQJNVgw== X-Received: by 10.66.54.132 with SMTP id j4mr17051953pap.110.1472137952057; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 08:12:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from WIN-J8BHLQU1U0C (ec2-52-35-40-29.us-west-2.compute.amazonaws.com. [52.35.40.29]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 18sm21713478pfn.33.2016.08.25.08.12.30 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 25 Aug 2016 08:12:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 15:41:29 +0200 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Carol Moore Subject: Buyer's Guide for Learning Management System(LMS) Software Message-ID: <6f79e309db1affc029b5eef93a837e47@WIN-J8BHLQU1U0C> X-Mailer: PHPMailer 5.2.15 (https://github.com/PHPMailer/PHPMailer) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 15:12:33 -0000 Buyer's Guide for Learning Management System Software =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 Compare Systems =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09 =09 =09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09Centralizes source of learning =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09Reduces learning and development costs =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09Tracks learner progress and performance =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09 =09 =09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09One Minute Could Save You Days of Frustration =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09With the multitude of learning management system= software solutions available today, selecting the right system for your or= ganization can be challenging. Software Advice™ is a trusted resource= for software buyers. We provide detailed reviews and research on thousands= of software applications. =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 Get free price quotes and relevant recommendations on systems that match your exact needs! =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 Learn More =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09 =09 =09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09 =09 =09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09Other Offers Recommended For You =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09 =09 =09=09=09 =09=09 =09 =09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =20 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=095 Top E-learning Content Authoring Tools = for Corporate Trainers =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 Compare =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =20 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09Find The Best Human Resources Software Sys= tems for 2016 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 Get Pricing =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09 =09 =09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09 =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09You are receiving this email because you have re= gistered for a download, white paper, comparison guide,or have elected to r= eceive information or offers from Software Purchase Guide Inc. You're signed up as freebsd-ports@freebsd.org. =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09Our mailing address is: Software Purchase Guide = Inc, 501 Silverside Rd, STE 105, Wilmington, DE 19809, info@softwarepurcha= seguide.com =09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09=09If you do not want to receive any emails from So= ftware Purchase Guide Inc unsubscribe here From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Aug 25 18:51:19 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95624BC6A16 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 18:51:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brnrd@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A4AC1A64 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 18:51:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brnrd@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 79A55BC6A15; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 18:51:19 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 794C6BC6A14 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 18:51:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brnrd@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp01.qsp.nl (smtp01.qsp.nl [193.254.214.162]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39A1C1A63 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 18:51:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brnrd@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp01.qsp.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp01.qsp.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 834FF2A0D0A; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 20:51:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from mail.brnrd.eu (unknown [193.164.217.85]) by smtp01.qsp.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 20:51:16 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=brnrd.eu; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id; s=default; bh=aDPCR33Vu0q+1mNPMXu1EeVG2upvoVJ5fopyM+jt86g=; b=3OyaV8qFimWOdPec1GbBQUeiT8yL5+UFwE5eBxSMXxWtKacfYhE1VsMTTt9bhbV3lBz80x9Lf0HeyTZlI+A3R+6kr7EPorcsamUWIFA4Cp52tOS8EZeekDoJeTASftGozXTP/8mwWPaWWK5x40KlDnXrpE6IjYROsMW/pneOEqMe0o6UbgsYEoQldpTBEMiQSGBWWtcy28Q2EcDSwml4IFbJY+bPN+ScFvWyj1xyhdtZG03BrZug+UOhCOQ27C8KhSQ7iL6lwSeK2QpW/9DQ0w8vhEnCUWX3c1rJlfZcynOqvcl9IARKWV53TNZJk6aXvpYFGPoXQOrXP/vLJp64dA== Received: by bachfreund.nl (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id b2c67b77 TLS version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 20:51:15 +0200 (CEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 20:51:15 +0200 From: Bernard Spil To: Lowell Gilbert Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upcoming OpenSSL 1.1.0 release In-Reply-To: <44lgzm53rn.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <6d35459045985929d061f3c6cca85efe@imap.brnrd.eu> <0E328A9485C47045F93C19AB@atuin.in.mat.cc> <20160823124201.GB48814@xtaz.uk> <44lgzm53rn.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Message-ID: <26373d990ef1e10aca8a1582c7cdad0c@imap.brnrd.eu> X-Sender: brnrd@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.0 X-SMTP-Virus-Scanned: clamav at smtp01 X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.6 required=5.0 tests=HK_RANDOM_ENVFROM, HK_RANDOM_FROM,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=disabled version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on svfilter02.qsp.nl X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 18:51:19 -0000 On 2016-08-24 22:08, Lowell Gilbert wrote: > Bernard Spil writes: > >> Today new vulnerabilities with (3)DES and BlowFish were made public > > You're referring to something different than the HTTPS/OpenVPN > attacks? Because it really wouldn't be accurate to describe those > as vulnerabilities in the ciphers. Hi Lowell, Correct. And that is indeed not a vulnerability in the cipher. As far as I know all cipher suites in use that support DES or 3DES use CBC mode and are vulnerable. Disabling DES and 3DES therefore makes sense to me. Cheers, Bernard. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Aug 25 19:49:27 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01FAFBC68C6 for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 19:49:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: from mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [217.69.76.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "0x20.net", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 DV Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDCC6123B for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 19:49:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [IPv6:2001:aa8:fffb:1::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.0x20.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E125A6E0081; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 21:49:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id u7PJnOVH063954; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 21:49:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: (from lars@localhost) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id u7PJnOYI063841; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 21:49:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lars) Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 21:49:24 +0200 From: Lars Engels To: =?utf-8?B?UmHDumw=?= Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem with net-mgmt/icinga2 upgrading from 2.4.10 to 2.5.1 (r420729) Message-ID: <20160825194924.GJ92256@e-new.0x20.net> References: <1d0d6326-213d-228a-38d1-e546ea53543a@b2n.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="451BZW+OUuJBCAYj" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1d0d6326-213d-228a-38d1-e546ea53543a@b2n.org> X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.4 X-Operation-System: FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE-p23 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 19:49:27 -0000 --451BZW+OUuJBCAYj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 09:08:48PM +0200, Ra=C3=BAl wrote: > Hello! >=20 > grateful for the great work on the ports > I don't remember last problem upgrading with them, Awesome! > just a little setback >=20 > upgraded using portmaster, everything went apparently fine > followed pkg-message to update schema db as I use mysql, also fine > but when I try to start it I got: >=20 > [....] > # service icinga2 start > Performing sanity check of icinga2 configuration:=20 > /usr/local/lib/icinga2/libcli.so: Undefined symbol=20 > "_ZN6icinga14ConfigCompiler15CollectIncludesERNSt3__16vectorIPNS_10Expres= sionENS1_9allocatorIS4_EEEERKNS_6StringESB_SB_" > FAILED > [....] This is now fixed. --451BZW+OUuJBCAYj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJXv0vEXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ4RjQwMDE3RTRERjUzMTI1N0FGRTUxNDlF NTRDQjM3RDNBMDg5RDZEAAoJEOVMs306CJ1t8WsIAL7GaIHhbXkSkxAfDAG7CB1y 4W9aEBVCNfpUieAqSdRUKc+XDDKbUlHfdwPdarE7M1rStwJaeEjpdW3juA2/lLxy U7pt57iHw6U1aIYZAyIuj1kNDwu9+iahWR2Pu3XraJTbo4NEPu9K+/NN7UQ2h0Rl jX/c+yauckPFzHU0mCqmp5BC0/piNFxf3Qj+e2iUAG9csJBIE4jaYivAMhnQHgnR CZvtvXzmcG1+JHbenUyreRz6fdLPt5zom6QzLxpVtHphBsNQEtQovVSLdfD64VgO vdcmercJBi9Ju+6v/viRuIWgxNaoMGtmNxHYlv5pkjdbaGtVxOIlr3cUQ3UZQbY= =jOg0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --451BZW+OUuJBCAYj-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Aug 25 20:36:15 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D872BC4A4B for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 20:36:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raul@b2n.org) Received: from mail1.isdefe.es (mail1.isdefe.es [194.15.213.239]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70AF6183D for ; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 20:36:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raul@b2n.org) Received: from turing.b2n.org (unknown [172.24.1.14]) by mail1.isdefe.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C3B331674D; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 22:36:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by turing.b2n.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CB8735E20B; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 22:36:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 204.152.158.146.dynamic.jazztel.es (204.152.158.146.dynamic.jazztel.es [146.158.152.204]) by turing.b2n.org (Horde Framework) with HTTPS; Thu, 25 Aug 2016 22:36:06 +0200 Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 22:36:06 +0200 Message-ID: <20160825223606.Horde.sQgWIWtWlZL2Jdq4WO-4RiX@turing.b2n.org> From: Raul To: Lars Engels Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem with net-mgmt/icinga2 upgrading from 2.4.10 to 2.5.1 (r420729) References: <1d0d6326-213d-228a-38d1-e546ea53543a@b2n.org> <20160825194924.GJ92256@e-new.0x20.net> In-Reply-To: <20160825194924.GJ92256@e-new.0x20.net> User-Agent: Horde Application Framework 5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2016 20:36:15 -0000 Lars Engels escribió: >> [....] >> # service icinga2 start >> Performing sanity check of icinga2 configuration: >> /usr/local/lib/icinga2/libcli.so: Undefined symbol >> "_ZN6icinga14ConfigCompiler15CollectIncludesERNSt3__16vectorIPNS_10ExpressionENS1_9allocatorIS4_EEEERKNS_6StringESB_SB_" >> FAILED >> [....] > > This is now fixed. I'm sorry to say it but not in my case (openssl-1.0.2_14) [....] Performing sanity check of icinga2 configuration: /usr/local/lib/icinga2/libremote.so: Undefined symbol "_ZTVN6icinga18GetScopeExpressionE" [....] still with 'libcli-1.9.6_1' installed removing ssl from USES let it run again From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 26 06:01:38 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8CE7BC667C for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 06:01:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from t@tobik.me) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F2B41485 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 06:01:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from t@tobik.me) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 9ACE1BC667B; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 06:01:38 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A6F3BC6679 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 06:01:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from t@tobik.me) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74DF51484 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 06:01:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from t@tobik.me) Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA30720519 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 02:01:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web1 ([10.202.2.211]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 26 Aug 2016 02:01:35 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tobik.me; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=pHV MP205IeK4FaYmZ4zlzE13rqk=; b=bOIRfuD1f6Hs7CVisgULoEtgE+PwkDQe2m/ pQfbb0iXDAywzEWsOS+gyzC0J5noHiD9iMdUWLfL/0sgYUnve2BkS98SU2dGUMH1 0781Rz58KsPOEjjmLbU8E3IXxpIMbl/FBbms8xHFLLCORnen5yRk79q7aqSnbr/O CSG8yQko= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=pHVMP205IeK4FaYmZ4zlzE13rqk=; b=s97se InP0gWJf7KOTPUBJAEos3O9rhRV+pvDhhPueKskZJeHrAtY5nDNUFlOPJSe1ahT+ 8098xuDYj6WcelGcmPPlLxLAwQyOXmiR0/id2sLu14fVRcUdgvz3tytkh4oDGE+0 wd3upEKGW8XTqz9QN82i5Zj9wgJixHZSILHXrc= Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id BD2D76A21E; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 02:01:35 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1472191295.1829334.706642825.27EC806F@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: bnEq2Vlbioz8BlQYphUMhwRqAxO42UQQx29ISicot4sc 1472191295 From: Tobias Kortkamp To: ports@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-5ae55197 Subject: Committers needed Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 08:01:35 +0200 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 06:01:38 -0000 Hi, could someone take a look at these PRs? Hexchat still doesn't compile when gcc is installed: https://bugs.freebsd.org/211327 Build fix and missing run dependencies for devel/stack: https://bugs.freebsd.org/211312 PRs with maintainer timeouts or approval: https://bugs.freebsd.org/211223 https://bugs.freebsd.org/211288 https://bugs.freebsd.org/211663 https://bugs.freebsd.org/211664 https://bugs.freebsd.org/211573 https://bugs.freebsd.org/211624 Thanks! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 26 07:00:11 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A830BC6D6D for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 07:00:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abi@abinet.ru) Received: from mail.abinet.ru (mail.abinet.ru [136.243.72.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1062515E5 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 07:00:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abi@abinet.ru) Received: from sphinx.abinet.ru (unknown [192.168.2.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.abinet.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9A051415 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 07:00:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=abinet.ru; s=dkim; t=1472194808; bh=P6v9y8teuugpNdFyhi9dtxj2UNdSPm/12RSmjZNNPNA=; h=Date:From:To:Subject; b=GLLap5aczVzwN5rBXTFcPH2VV57e/YO4ENx+axCFPrXlWxgD9Ly/2LRCCHsNLvrxl qOouJig54efbY8SKkq7R2RnoWQQ9cY6PiQAugIG0E85LDc780ZdI59Zj1R3GCEIk/Y S9HQuEtVP5C8eNwuHRA6pSSGzZ0ZtKj9KHShUHr4= Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 10:00:00 +0300 From: abi To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: security/strongswan start=route issue Message-Id: <20160826100000.1126b42d107c93d648a8957a@abinet.ru> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,T_DKIM_INVALID, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=disabled version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Report: * -0.0 BAYES_20 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 5 to 20% * [score: 0.1229] * 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines * 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on postfix.abinet.ru X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 07:00:11 -0000 Hello, I'd like to open PR on upstream, but I want be sure that the problem exists not only for me, as the problem looks strange. The issue is that tunnel behaves different if it autostarts (auto=start) and when it starts when traffic registered between left and right side. (auto=route). The latter method not works. I see tunnel up, route table updated, but no traffic flows. So, the test is very easy: 1. Stop strongswan 2. Change /usr/local/etc/ipsec.conf tunnel config to auto=route 3. Start strongswan and try to ping the right side. 4. The tunnel should up, but no reply to pings. If it matters, I use virtual ip (as it's a laptop without left network and without external ip). -- abi From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 26 07:05:23 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9A83A930AA for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 07:05:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from host64.kissl.de (host64.kissl.de [213.239.241.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "*.shmhost.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92A37192A for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 07:05:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from francos-mbp.homeoffice.local (ipservice-092-208-160-166.092.208.pools.vodafone-ip.de [92.208.160.166]) (Authenticated sender: web104p1) by host64.kissl.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F1E996B7C1; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 09:05:19 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: security/strongswan start=route issue From: Franco Fichtner In-Reply-To: <20160826100000.1126b42d107c93d648a8957a@abinet.ru> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 09:05:19 +0200 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20160826100000.1126b42d107c93d648a8957a@abinet.ru> To: abi X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at host64.kissl.de X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 07:05:23 -0000 Hi, > On 26 Aug 2016, at 9:00 AM, abi wrote: >=20 > I'd like to open PR on upstream, but I want be sure that the problem = exists not only for me, as the problem looks strange. > The issue is that tunnel behaves different if it autostarts = (auto=3Dstart) and when it starts when traffic registered between left = and right side. (auto=3Droute). This works fine in our OPNsense setups. Make sure you use ping with the option "-S $LEFT_IP", it will only auto-route local traffic that originates from within your leftsubnet. Cheers, Franco= From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 26 07:17:59 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DBB5A933D3 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 07:17:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: from mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [IPv6:2001:aa8:fffb:1::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "0x20.net", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 DV Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62B7B5F9 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 07:17:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [IPv6:2001:aa8:fffb:1::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.0x20.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADE996E0081; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 09:17:55 +0200 (CEST) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id u7Q7HttD070901; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 09:17:55 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: (from lars@localhost) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id u7Q7HrGF069781; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 09:17:53 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lars) Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 09:17:53 +0200 From: Lars Engels To: Raul Cc: Lars Engels , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem with net-mgmt/icinga2 upgrading from 2.4.10 to 2.5.1 (r420729) Message-ID: <20160826071753.GK92256@e-new.0x20.net> References: <1d0d6326-213d-228a-38d1-e546ea53543a@b2n.org> <20160825194924.GJ92256@e-new.0x20.net> <20160825223606.Horde.sQgWIWtWlZL2Jdq4WO-4RiX@turing.b2n.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HTLCc13+3hfAZ6SL" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160825223606.Horde.sQgWIWtWlZL2Jdq4WO-4RiX@turing.b2n.org> X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.4 X-Operation-System: FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE-p23 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 07:17:59 -0000 --HTLCc13+3hfAZ6SL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Aug 25, 2016 at 10:36:06PM +0200, Raul wrote: >=20 > Lars Engels escribi=C3=B3: >=20 > >> [....] > >> # service icinga2 start > >> Performing sanity check of icinga2 configuration: > >> /usr/local/lib/icinga2/libcli.so: Undefined symbol > >> "_ZN6icinga14ConfigCompiler15CollectIncludesERNSt3__16vectorIPNS_10Exp= ressionENS1_9allocatorIS4_EEEERKNS_6StringESB_SB_" > >> FAILED > >> [....] > > > > This is now fixed. >=20 > I'm sorry to say it but not in my case (openssl-1.0.2_14) :-/ >=20 > [....] > Performing sanity check of icinga2 configuration: =20 > /usr/local/lib/icinga2/libremote.so: Undefined symbol =20 > "_ZTVN6icinga18GetScopeExpressionE" > [....] >=20 > still with 'libcli-1.9.6_1' installed > removing ssl from USES let it run again >=20 Please delete devel/libcli as a workaround. --HTLCc13+3hfAZ6SL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJXv+0hXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ4RjQwMDE3RTRERjUzMTI1N0FGRTUxNDlF NTRDQjM3RDNBMDg5RDZEAAoJEOVMs306CJ1tqA4IAMVg5g5Bt8ssBhNLf93b7oC/ QRenqqNNAUQfT3S+ptWGjiB1CIbvi22L2ilu7ikZ4aepQQEOuSrxS7jr8jUvA9MB sRRzTn3jC+/uiQOeoJyR+2EviIajLjwi5Nx1omp7YGeFXS0bsRUrh2Lx4Lafujd+ iqOeqdqhgUGT++EHD5BoO/wkbhdGMXmgBaRgj6Ew0MhoJY+fqOQkczOTr549aEtl v1f9ELTOXpLpM8h9vYufkR9x2H+8WUHbgMkgeyM8NddwpdES1igHzQ4GpVCA13Lc yYem5mSq6HOf8XpIjljU4fvEpkyT6k7IAtpYWWYaop4JCHuhMqiqSmuy7qjByOc= =a9wr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HTLCc13+3hfAZ6SL-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 26 07:28:27 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F078AA935E2 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 07:28:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB7F09E0 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 07:28:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C7387A935E1; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 07:28:27 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6D91A935E0 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 07:28:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-x22a.google.com (mail-pa0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 946A59DF for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 07:28:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pa0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id fi15so24773039pac.1 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:28:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:reply-to:subject:references:to:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Dt+HqPCoy112hItvuknZgJhHGsR/wnv6uySJSjJbXsc=; b=MuOn68vAMoVD/VkRK7ICGAybgnPpeKOOWhtoWreunGAmvjVe/TsEC4E4VWcIbmhFKf yNzWJA+S3wi4SFGMh960WZToLziCPOUljxxd3CQS5SbPy6NUZZMsBTL8+eDeGNhGSCwM n2XLxszrJ4aG+rumWBlfrXW7roMreSnIGfUy5t6//CRdlXg/xS4JhnVEn5jt3WfmFfed +kaQ/jFmc19dPTc26rOt/E9YmjQoQncsqhhh4TK9aPBv0W+aDMASEFQIjIrAK0ms+Jft mZRDXnj+qaF/zvVp17TkDnp2o4V8/pIzMXkvXssTAkKdNCjExUwNzPbploLWUhzoG8jh W+UA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:reply-to:subject:references:to:from :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Dt+HqPCoy112hItvuknZgJhHGsR/wnv6uySJSjJbXsc=; b=HQUsass5u4CECFvmRQMsOmHkG/SVKO4xXSxu1CnuE/l9YzVBA/xC5Pcpp1TXcrZwQx mCRYZqwTRVBIuJiggHnGHDG+6z9W93MClIu6Xd4mT3YoyDx3/d2/RyzghWuqrQPwJtyY d26fTmd2OoRao0a2tSu4ppwci04aIqibduSfsSzLMqzZio88Jb77BgZFqoXXZzWyHcxM ZcQo/TkovIPxeJGUjVBZEL7/HnCuWh1tNnlsZjmdLjb8MJ9NiOkcUHbGfot8PO3v/M4i hDQlHVx4PWqq2/u9/ddtVITmUzsuzpjG/r0aLCEFQYPkXcDj0pdIoLSmUmDjcmGFKU3d G4/Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNad1rknb7wqbkC+2PJ/9lUGFkeEqBHECObqwkLWQ3vtAL107W/JMGhpHXPyxJjBw== X-Received: by 10.66.5.72 with SMTP id q8mr3397814paq.38.1472196506967; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:28:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:44b8:31ae:7b01:1c1a:5103:265d:bfaf? (2001-44b8-31ae-7b01-1c1a-5103-265d-bfaf.static.ipv6.internode.on.net. [2001:44b8:31ae:7b01:1c1a:5103:265d:bfaf]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id uc1sm25907161pac.24.2016.08.26.00.28.25 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 26 Aug 2016 00:28:26 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Kubilay Kocak Reply-To: koobs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Committers needed References: <1472191295.1829334.706642825.27EC806F@webmail.messagingengine.com> To: Tobias Kortkamp , ports@FreeBSD.org From: Kubilay Kocak Message-ID: Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 17:28:19 +1000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:50.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/50.0a2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1472191295.1829334.706642825.27EC806F@webmail.messagingengine.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-AU Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 07:28:28 -0000 On 26/08/2016 4:01 PM, Tobias Kortkamp wrote: > Hi, > > could someone take a look at these PRs? > > Hexchat still doesn't compile when gcc is installed: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/211327 > > Build fix and missing run dependencies for devel/stack: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/211312 > > PRs with maintainer timeouts or approval: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/211223 > https://bugs.freebsd.org/211288 > https://bugs.freebsd.org/211663 > https://bugs.freebsd.org/211664 > https://bugs.freebsd.org/211573 > https://bugs.freebsd.org/211624 > > Thanks! Hey Tobias :) Given the extent of your contribution and proactivity, I'd be happy to offer you Bugzilla 'editbugs' permissions so you can triage / 'maintainer timeout' / classify issues without having to wait for anyone. Jump on #freebsd-bugs on freenode IRC if you (or anyone else) are keen to join the triage crew ./koobs Bugmeister From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 26 07:34:36 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31F1AA93792 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 07:34:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raul@b2n.org) Received: from mail1.isdefe.es (mail1.isdefe.es [194.15.213.239]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E881BCD1 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 07:34:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from raul@b2n.org) Received: from turing.b2n.org (unknown [172.24.1.14]) by mail1.isdefe.es (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4AA72BAA71; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 09:34:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by turing.b2n.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B701035E208; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 09:34:32 +0200 (CEST) Received: from 194.15.213.7 ([194.15.213.7]) by turing.b2n.org (Horde Framework) with HTTPS; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 09:34:32 +0200 Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 09:34:32 +0200 Message-ID: <20160826093432.Horde.Kf0b3J0tGtOaC2SdRoBbd4Z@turing.b2n.org> From: Raul To: Lars Engels Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem with net-mgmt/icinga2 upgrading from 2.4.10 to 2.5.1 (r420729) References: <1d0d6326-213d-228a-38d1-e546ea53543a@b2n.org> <20160825194924.GJ92256@e-new.0x20.net> <20160825223606.Horde.sQgWIWtWlZL2Jdq4WO-4RiX@turing.b2n.org> <20160826071753.GK92256@e-new.0x20.net> In-Reply-To: <20160826071753.GK92256@e-new.0x20.net> User-Agent: Horde Application Framework 5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 07:34:36 -0000 Lars Engels escribió: >> still with 'libcli-1.9.6_1' installed >> removing ssl from USES let it run again > Please delete devel/libcli as a workaround. Ok so, without libcli and with ssl: [....] Performing sanity check of icinga2 configuration: /usr/local/lib/icinga2/libcli.so: Undefined symbol "_ZN6icinga14ConfigCompiler15CollectIncludesERNSt3__16vectorIPNS_10ExpressionENS1_9allocatorIS4_EEEERKNS_6StringESB_SB_" [....] with libcli and ssl: [....] Performing sanity check of icinga2 configuration: /usr/local/lib/icinga2/libremote.so: Undefined symbol "_ZTVN6icinga18GetScopeExpressionE" [....] with libcli and without ssl it works From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 26 07:37:42 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 515FBA93876 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 07:37:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: from mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [IPv6:2001:aa8:fffb:1::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "0x20.net", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 DV Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18A96EED for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 07:37:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [IPv6:2001:aa8:fffb:1::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.0x20.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 743926E0081; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 09:37:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id u7Q7be7G061048; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 09:37:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: (from lars@localhost) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id u7Q7bdM8060740; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 09:37:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lars) Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 09:37:39 +0200 From: Lars Engels To: Raul Cc: Lars Engels , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem with net-mgmt/icinga2 upgrading from 2.4.10 to 2.5.1 (r420729) Message-ID: <20160826073739.GL92256@e-new.0x20.net> References: <1d0d6326-213d-228a-38d1-e546ea53543a@b2n.org> <20160825194924.GJ92256@e-new.0x20.net> <20160825223606.Horde.sQgWIWtWlZL2Jdq4WO-4RiX@turing.b2n.org> <20160826071753.GK92256@e-new.0x20.net> <20160826093432.Horde.Kf0b3J0tGtOaC2SdRoBbd4Z@turing.b2n.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="00hq2S6J2Jlg6EbK" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160826093432.Horde.Kf0b3J0tGtOaC2SdRoBbd4Z@turing.b2n.org> X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.4 X-Operation-System: FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE-p23 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 07:37:42 -0000 --00hq2S6J2Jlg6EbK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 09:34:32AM +0200, Raul wrote: >=20 > Lars Engels escribi=C3=B3: >=20 > >> still with 'libcli-1.9.6_1' installed > >> removing ssl from USES let it run again > > Please delete devel/libcli as a workaround. >=20 > Ok so, without libcli and with ssl: >=20 > [....] > Performing sanity check of icinga2 configuration: =20 > /usr/local/lib/icinga2/libcli.so: Undefined symbol =20 > "_ZN6icinga14ConfigCompiler15CollectIncludesERNSt3__16vectorIPNS_10Expres= sionENS1_9allocatorIS4_EEEERKNS_6StringESB_SB_" > [....] >=20 > with libcli and ssl: >=20 > [....] > Performing sanity check of icinga2 configuration: =20 > /usr/local/lib/icinga2/libremote.so: Undefined symbol =20 > "_ZTVN6icinga18GetScopeExpressionE" > [....] >=20 > with libcli and without ssl it works >=20 Meh, thanks! Upstream now has a patch that I will try. --00hq2S6J2Jlg6EbK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJXv/HDXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ4RjQwMDE3RTRERjUzMTI1N0FGRTUxNDlF NTRDQjM3RDNBMDg5RDZEAAoJEOVMs306CJ1tpM0H/0XbY/36vaEj/zbUVhJwzhBE noa/EyKSq4fPDD3GZnItNyIeff8TvxqVV4EEMGnXANnlo75Vz2h2zRRH5LGl91Dt jj1qFW1NxT2ersS9RhKdxnu/hw3Qz17cTnzGypJs4/MFuSyMhtaiVLKmFj2F5FkV Okf0H4RNboB3QDEh40pKDDz6zKwFhavv7T2yuf3JhntoJDX1wX92nRCyiU69GDE6 +Mqx3f7McYHJw3hl1Ts77a09yUNcaqT/bCt3BpFM05Gtr9Rft2wqVOBoAYVpyiqK gmmTFKmq9SRd58O050lSmt75gDOKEMPNMrWe4RWHExw4mF32vYATrURQSd7jEBk= =2PW2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --00hq2S6J2Jlg6EbK-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 26 09:53:14 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 090B6A9418C for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 09:53:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED548846 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 09:53:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id ECB9BA9418B; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 09:53:13 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC63BA9418A for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 09:53:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B22D9845 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 09:53:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1bdDp2-000Ldf-8F; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:53:12 +0200 Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:53:12 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Tobias Kortkamp Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Committers needed Message-ID: <20160826095312.GX96200@home.opsec.eu> References: <1472191295.1829334.706642825.27EC806F@webmail.messagingengine.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1472191295.1829334.706642825.27EC806F@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 09:53:14 -0000 Hi! > Hexchat still doesn't compile when gcc is installed: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/211327 Done. > Build fix and missing run dependencies for devel/stack: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/211312 Done. > PRs with maintainer timeouts or approval: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/211223 Committed to HEAD, discussing MFH > https://bugs.freebsd.org/211288 Committed to HEAD, discussing MFH > https://bugs.freebsd.org/211663 > https://bugs.freebsd.org/211664 > https://bugs.freebsd.org/211573 > https://bugs.freebsd.org/211624 Pending other tasks... -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 26 11:14:57 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C508CA94845 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:14:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD5B8A for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:14:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A8C3AA94844; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:14:57 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8611A94843 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:14:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp.rcn.com (smtp.rcn.com [69.168.97.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A7699 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:14:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) X_CMAE_Category: , , X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=Ctr9STwD c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=0PTp8w6Pvj1+lQk9i7t3eA==:117 a=0PTp8w6Pvj1+lQk9i7t3eA==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=TxfmcdFzOpWtCZFYdoIA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=IjZwj45LgO3ly-622nXo:22 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine X-Authed-Username: cm9iZXJ0aHVmZkByY24uY29t Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com header.from=roberthuff@rcn.com; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.mail=roberthuff@rcn.com; spf=neutral; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.user=roberthuff; auth=pass (PLAIN) Received-SPF: neutral (smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com: 209.6.208.195 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of rcn.com) Received: from [209.6.208.195] ([209.6.208.195:1101] helo=[192.168.1.117]) by smtp.rcn.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.6.23.54417 r(Core:3.6.23.0)) with ESMTPA id B2/59-04139-AA420C75; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 07:14:50 -0400 To: ports@freebsd.org From: Robert Huff Subject: problem installing ports Message-ID: <57C0249E.4030500@rcn.com> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 07:14:38 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:14:57 -0000 So ... I replaced my 10.3/i386 system with: FreeBSD 11.0-RC2 #0 r304729: Wed Aug 24 06:59:03 UTC 2016 root@releng2.nyi.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 and kernel+world are working. Installing ports is a different matter. 1) I created /usr/ports and /usr/doc. 2) I "self-installed" pkg; this brought with it apr-1.5.2.1.5.4_1 db5-5.3.28_4 expat-2.1.1_2 gdbm-1.12 gettext-runtime-0.19.8.1 indexinfo-0.2.4 readline-6.3.8 serf-1.3.8_1 sqlite3-3.13.0 3) Next: root@>> pkg install subversion which I used to populate the ports tree. 4) Now, to install portmaster. That requires dialog4ports: root@>> make clean ===> Cleaning for dialog4ports-0.1.6 root@>> make ===> License BSD2CLAUSE accepted by the user ===> dialog4ports-0.1.6 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found ===> Fetching all distfiles required by dialog4ports-0.1.6 for building ===> Extracting for dialog4ports-0.1.6 => SHA256 Checksum OK for dialog4ports-0.1.6.tar.gz. ===> Patching for dialog4ports-0.1.6 ===> Configuring for dialog4ports-0.1.6 ===> Building for dialog4ports-0.1.6 --- dialog4ports.o --- --- mixedlist.o --- --- dialog4ports.1.gz --- --- dialog4ports.o --- cc -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -pedantic -c dialog4ports.c -o dialog4ports.o --- mixedlist.o --- cc -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -pedantic -c mixedlist.c -o mixedlist.o --- dialog4ports.1.gz --- gzip -cn dialog4ports.1 > dialog4ports.1.gz --- dialog4ports --- cc -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -pedantic dialog4ports.o mixedlist.o -o dialog4ports -lncursesw -lm -ldialog ===> Staging for dialog4ports-0.1.6 ===> Generating temporary packing list install -m 555 dialog4ports /data/port-work/usr/ports/ports-mgmt/dialog4ports/work/stage/usr/local/bin install -m 0644 dialog4ports.1.gz /data/port-work/usr/ports/ports-mgmt/dialog4ports/work/stage/usr/local/man/man1 ====> Compressing man pages (compress-man) root@>> make install ===> Installing for dialog4ports-0.1.6 ===> Checking if dialog4ports already installed ===> Registering installation for dialog4ports-0.1.6 Installing dialog4ports-0.1.6... Child process pid=6648 terminated abnormally: Bus error *** Error code 138 Stop. ... and pkg-static drops a core file. I get this (with different pids) for _every_ port on "make install". Never seen this before. Google offered no possible causes. "Bus error" means a memory violation - and I have no idea how to proceed. The core file has no debugging symbols, making a backtrace useless. Exasperatedly, Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 26 11:33:58 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53C40A94D12 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:33:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D7E6CCE for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:33:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 39252A94D11; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:33:58 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38CF6A94D10 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:33:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from kib.kiev.ua (kib.kiev.ua [IPv6:2001:470:d5e7:1::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6310CCD for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:33:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from tom.home (kib@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kib.kiev.ua (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id u7QBXrVE070478 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 26 Aug 2016 14:33:53 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 kib.kiev.ua u7QBXrVE070478 Received: (from kostik@localhost) by tom.home (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id u7QBXq3v070477; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 14:33:52 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: tom.home: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 14:33:52 +0300 From: Konstantin Belousov To: Robert Huff Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem installing ports Message-ID: <20160826113352.GT83214@kib.kiev.ua> References: <57C0249E.4030500@rcn.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <57C0249E.4030500@rcn.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FREEMAIL_FROM,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on tom.home X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:33:58 -0000 On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 07:14:38AM -0400, Robert Huff wrote: > So ... > I replaced my 10.3/i386 system with: > > FreeBSD 11.0-RC2 #0 r304729: Wed Aug 24 06:59:03 UTC 2016 > root@releng2.nyi.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 > > and kernel+world are working. > Installing ports is a different matter. > 1) I created /usr/ports and /usr/doc. > 2) I "self-installed" pkg; this brought with it > > apr-1.5.2.1.5.4_1 > db5-5.3.28_4 > expat-2.1.1_2 > gdbm-1.12 > gettext-runtime-0.19.8.1 > indexinfo-0.2.4 > readline-6.3.8 > serf-1.3.8_1 > sqlite3-3.13.0 > > 3) Next: > > root@>> pkg install subversion > > which I used to populate the ports tree. > 4) Now, to install portmaster. That requires dialog4ports: > > root@>> make clean > ===> Cleaning for dialog4ports-0.1.6 > root@>> make > ===> License BSD2CLAUSE accepted by the user > ===> dialog4ports-0.1.6 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found > ===> Fetching all distfiles required by dialog4ports-0.1.6 for building > ===> Extracting for dialog4ports-0.1.6 > => SHA256 Checksum OK for dialog4ports-0.1.6.tar.gz. > ===> Patching for dialog4ports-0.1.6 > ===> Configuring for dialog4ports-0.1.6 > ===> Building for dialog4ports-0.1.6 > --- dialog4ports.o --- > --- mixedlist.o --- > --- dialog4ports.1.gz --- > --- dialog4ports.o --- > cc -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -pedantic -c > dialog4ports.c -o dialog4ports.o > --- mixedlist.o --- > cc -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -pedantic -c > mixedlist.c -o mixedlist.o > --- dialog4ports.1.gz --- > gzip -cn dialog4ports.1 > dialog4ports.1.gz > --- dialog4ports --- > cc -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -pedantic > dialog4ports.o mixedlist.o -o dialog4ports -lncursesw -lm -ldialog > ===> Staging for dialog4ports-0.1.6 > ===> Generating temporary packing list > install -m 555 dialog4ports > /data/port-work/usr/ports/ports-mgmt/dialog4ports/work/stage/usr/local/bin > install -m 0644 dialog4ports.1.gz > /data/port-work/usr/ports/ports-mgmt/dialog4ports/work/stage/usr/local/man/man1 > ====> Compressing man pages (compress-man) > root@>> make install > ===> Installing for dialog4ports-0.1.6 > ===> Checking if dialog4ports already installed > ===> Registering installation for dialog4ports-0.1.6 > Installing dialog4ports-0.1.6... > Child process pid=6648 terminated abnormally: Bus error > *** Error code 138 > > Stop. > > ... and pkg-static drops a core file. > I get this (with different pids) for _every_ port on "make install". > Never seen this before. Google offered no possible causes. > "Bus error" means a memory violation - and I have no idea how to > proceed. The core file has no debugging symbols, making a backtrace > useless. > Let me guess, you have (NFSv4) ACLs enabled somewhere. The HEAD was supposedly fixed in r304075, but the change still was not merged to stable/11. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 26 11:42:37 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D33A94FAB for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:42:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B969A7F for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:42:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B87B2A94FAA; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:42:37 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B81C6A94FA9 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:42:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp.rcn.com (smtp.rcn.com [69.168.97.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8862E7E for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:42:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) X_CMAE_Category: , , X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=Ctr9STwD c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=0PTp8w6Pvj1+lQk9i7t3eA==:117 a=0PTp8w6Pvj1+lQk9i7t3eA==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=Ik8j0ka02E8fGN9g6AcA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine X-Authed-Username: cm9iZXJ0aHVmZkByY24uY29t Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com header.from=roberthuff@rcn.com; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.mail=roberthuff@rcn.com; spf=neutral; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.user=roberthuff; auth=pass (PLAIN) Received-SPF: neutral (smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com: 209.6.208.195 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of rcn.com) Received: from [209.6.208.195] ([209.6.208.195:1118] helo=[192.168.1.117]) by smtp.rcn.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.6.23.54417 r(Core:3.6.23.0)) with ESMTPA id 76/BA-04139-B2B20C75; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 07:42:36 -0400 Subject: Re: problem installing ports To: Konstantin Belousov References: <57C0249E.4030500@rcn.com> <20160826113352.GT83214@kib.kiev.ua> Cc: ports@freebsd.org From: Robert Huff Message-ID: <57C02B2C.8060200@rcn.com> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 07:42:36 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160826113352.GT83214@kib.kiev.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:42:37 -0000 On 8/26/2016 7:33 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote: >> ===> Registering installation for dialog4ports-0.1.6 >> Installing dialog4ports-0.1.6... >> Child process pid=6648 terminated abnormally: Bus error >> *** Error code 138 >> >> Stop. >> >> ... and pkg-static drops a core file. >> I get this (with different pids) for _every_ port on "make install". >> Never seen this before. Google offered no possible causes. >> "Bus error" means a memory violation - and I have no idea how to >> proceed. The core file has no debugging symbols, making a backtrace >> useless. >> > > Let me guess, you have (NFSv4) ACLs enabled somewhere. The HEAD was > supposedly fixed in r304075, but the change still was not merged to > stable/11. Yes, on the filesystem that holds WRKDIRPREFIX. Is it as simple as that? (And is there a PR number?) Boggled at the simplicity, Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 26 13:54:49 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F14B9B70ADB for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 13:54:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abi@abinet.ru) Received: from mail.abinet.ru (mail.abinet.ru [136.243.72.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3231E86 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 13:54:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abi@abinet.ru) Received: from sphinx.abinet.ru (host-54-159-66-217.spbmts.ru [217.66.159.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.abinet.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5EDD463E; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 13:54:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=abinet.ru; s=dkim; t=1472219687; bh=r9W0Dmm2qC38cfimsBDeXKR7nCYVnJSWi1/KxJ96NxU=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=YGWAfjuB1XRSYfKTM9L7w7nqw/N+tE67UtmegMM99UqHr5468VjF0yQ+GR2hZhkiG gxDy0t/vpxcGdAY7Fggt9zdsKCk4akVNVInDIXdslZ4aMB5TKC0zH/7Ze8O1BpcLWP nb1siW0uFPXY37mFw0QeCrWQW9RYGKd5P6Mrc8ok= Subject: Re: security/strongswan start=route issue To: Franco Fichtner References: <20160826100000.1126b42d107c93d648a8957a@abinet.ru> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: abi Message-ID: Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 16:54:45 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_DKIM_INVALID, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=disabled version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0002] * 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines * 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on postfix.abinet.ru X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 13:54:50 -0000 Strange indeed. Yes, I ping correctly and auto=start works flawless. Is OPNsense tracking 10 branch? I'm on 11-RC1 On 26.08.16 10:05, Franco Fichtner wrote: > Hi, > >> On 26 Aug 2016, at 9:00 AM, abi wrote: >> >> I'd like to open PR on upstream, but I want be sure that the problem exists not only for me, as the problem looks strange. >> The issue is that tunnel behaves different if it autostarts (auto=start) and when it starts when traffic registered between left and right side. (auto=route). > This works fine in our OPNsense setups. > > Make sure you use ping with the option "-S $LEFT_IP", it will > only auto-route local traffic that originates from within your > leftsubnet. > > > Cheers, > Franco From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 26 14:01:40 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCD2CB70FAE for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 14:01:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from host64.kissl.de (host64.kissl.de [213.239.241.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "*.shmhost.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 968EC7C9 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 14:01:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from francos-mbp.homeoffice.local (ipservice-092-208-160-166.092.208.pools.vodafone-ip.de [92.208.160.166]) (Authenticated sender: web104p1) by host64.kissl.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 232E56B7C6; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 16:01:37 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: security/strongswan start=route issue From: Franco Fichtner In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 16:01:35 +0200 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: <20160826100000.1126b42d107c93d648a8957a@abinet.ru> To: abi X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at host64.kissl.de X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 14:01:40 -0000 > On 26 Aug 2016, at 3:54 PM, abi wrote: > > Strange indeed. Yes, I ping correctly and auto=start works flawless. > > Is OPNsense tracking 10 branch? I'm on 11-RC1 Yes, it's on 10.3. Can't say anything about the state of 11 in the next few weeks in that regard. Sorry. Cheers, Franco From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 26 14:10:18 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E72AB711C2 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 14:10:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E2B3AA2 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 14:10:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 09A98B711C1; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 14:10:18 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09511B711C0 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 14:10:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6B4FAA1 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 14:10:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1bdHpp-000M79-RE; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 16:10:17 +0200 Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 16:10:17 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Tobias Kortkamp , ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Committers needed Message-ID: <20160826141017.GY96200@home.opsec.eu> References: <1472191295.1829334.706642825.27EC806F@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20160826095312.GX96200@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160826095312.GX96200@home.opsec.eu> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 14:10:18 -0000 Hi! > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/211663 > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/211664 > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/211573 > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/211624 Done, with 211624 pending MFH. Tobias, does the change from 211624 mean that we can close the two PRs 154502 191296 as fixed with a reference to 211624 ? That's my take, but I'd like to have some confirmation before I closed them as fixed. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 26 14:21:20 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1C1FB71623 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 14:21:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp.rcn.com (smtp.rcn.com [69.168.97.78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 830B61E9 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 14:21:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) X_CMAE_Category: , , X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=Ctr9STwD c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=0PTp8w6Pvj1+lQk9i7t3eA==:117 a=0PTp8w6Pvj1+lQk9i7t3eA==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=qlY9yksvLQZauPkI8X4A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=1dLwkt2f61AA:10 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine X-Authed-Username: cm9iZXJ0aHVmZkByY24uY29t Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com header.from=roberthuff@rcn.com; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.mail=roberthuff@rcn.com; spf=neutral; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.user=roberthuff; auth=pass (PLAIN) Received-SPF: neutral (smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com: 209.6.208.195 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of rcn.com) Received: from [209.6.208.195] ([209.6.208.195:1179] helo=[192.168.1.117]) by smtp.rcn.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.6.23.54417 r(Core:3.6.23.0)) with ESMTPA id 50/5B-04139-E5050C75; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 10:21:18 -0400 Subject: Re: problem installing ports To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <57C0249E.4030500@rcn.com> <20160826113352.GT83214@kib.kiev.ua> <57C02B2C.8060200@rcn.com> From: Robert Huff Message-ID: <57C0505F.5080106@rcn.com> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 10:21:19 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <57C02B2C.8060200@rcn.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 14:21:20 -0000 On 8/26/2016 7:42 AM, Robert Huff wrote: >> Let me guess, you have (NFSv4) ACLs enabled somewhere. The HEAD was >> supposedly fixed in r304075, but the change still was not merged to >> stable/11. > > Yes, on the filesystem that holds WRKDIRPREFIX. > Is it as simple as that? (And is there a PR number?) Apparently, it is. Thanks for the helo. Madly compiling away, Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 26 18:45:17 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41890A94916 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 18:45:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scratch65535@att.net) Received: from nm27-vm2.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm27-vm2.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [216.39.63.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 190B0A74 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 18:45:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scratch65535@att.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=att.net; s=s1024; t=1472236930; bh=liLBb3CCMg9rdJOZiSqQPrOInljHqUW93eZKq7u3AoE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From:Subject; b=Wla4HFluY6sHCOtL2oDVjxGUtNg/JE8cPNZdo2IsFvpXIhPbgg+EO8CRn/TOaQDZtBjWBbsYyWg6ROU9MVR9wJ3/LrHe8/E5+UAegbjnaJ37lPjhaEyomuQrRIjgOHWpGK87QhA4C6DY+DazkYE8Ywdwxkcn7UnK/E4EehkHXmk= Received: from [216.39.60.168] by nm27.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 26 Aug 2016 18:42:10 -0000 Received: from [67.195.22.113] by tm4.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 26 Aug 2016 18:42:10 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp115.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 26 Aug 2016 18:42:10 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 694679.57014.bm@smtp115.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: RrunEKYVM1mBSf4rgZwmie6q86C5BT_onCFL.NNX6EgV9z7 SpM40yE0.MypoKu0A4T2UWcY_Vx97L8m_zDm.KyzyceYVhhEfGrGejSBTI9v o1ZQAmIU3nuGRMDm197MZAygSltchA56zvMPFZIC.vlNlG.JUPabzTPBxreR QOfYI403u1JUzIuFu9bKXV.dQZn9S8rQsSyweraM0MU0ZGjwZckBordcMwVk FVTebxySQ9a9ivXbbN9nU88HTlKmp_p8ZsPgPTIuqeZ112BDzsc4ThssUpg0 5j0b6MoydUdcFsE7Br5U9P0mjV3oErrL3LyB4DS5qek.nphXbBgxALALQm_z ocX1p93uIEMmghCPnbXf9tQYHLvJvcqGIBHNlv7j75mNznb7nMeR8crDhO8C f3iyo767ONi9aeZDClBlD2H0nz5b80F_4jbfE54IdmmpPuuaZNbOGjjC61._ s_hOhdRjRssvx6zTNjouCiYa0v9N99hutxeJoJh_BRmXmb7S9blVVgeD795N OKxdM9fHcBgq_YXKHtAVS0hbN0.tciKMF89vDN_RJu23pNfpusDBc_Y1xmSK W X-Yahoo-SMTP: pPvqnOaswBBbYZLVYFzvU7GaowLcbNioPp.aF8KvOjZk From: To: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: Gimp 2.8.18,2 plugins not working under 10.3 Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 14:42:11 -0400 Message-ID: References: <201608221107.u7MB7PHn082859@gw.catspoiler.org> In-Reply-To: <201608221107.u7MB7PHn082859@gw.catspoiler.org> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 18:45:17 -0000 [Default] On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 04:07:25 -0700 (PDT), Don Lewis wrote: > >sysctl kern.ipc.shm_allow_removed=1 That seems to have done the trick. Thanks! I hope the maintainer fixes the problem more generally, though. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 26 18:56:46 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D4DCA94B26 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 18:56:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mayhem30@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qk0-x22b.google.com (mail-qk0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E352ED5 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 18:56:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mayhem30@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qk0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id v123so85624251qkh.2 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:56:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=la0apvCI0J8GaMK5KWKlyGNHUVs051Tas6u6IWI7U1w=; b=tgYPl2jIvTqYaNLxIVE5RW1Lb9LhPHZ5COsWY8EbmYb8lsSvqomWXbj0CPfI5xZAxZ lklkHJZ8r5zaWebXWIRglh44pzddCb6Vb6VrmOwqUORl96N1szvVflt2qnRkLw5DKoD/ AiytL31MrMlRmp2XsaC3c8aHoHPWixAN5tiz9BeV/EbX/UvszyCBxCB7v10W/A5mfLWX lbnaSc8bd0+9QUe2IL63Bx+U5DA4yWaMIRWa+3kxrVi5aeZNGJUL4KLUljUHmhIjcgB+ p46auCe1oxm2E2+nNGBqzvzM1nLlxkhhhprgP9v+IendT5n8oRn0nUjgbLGuF0mMlhtd lXcg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=la0apvCI0J8GaMK5KWKlyGNHUVs051Tas6u6IWI7U1w=; b=Cb6X9mkLFxxGQilxqkpY/TRqi+qEo9ImzsAvnEByjEolzACrYigyL+DvD4xng8KKtc ojRTCzXgPm6b5oCHb1EXlZyLiDUm/uvlTXgXJiqNKugpjj4nvYC0bsNU+Qwo3cCaxAk/ EnNh3mtmmE28KI4S/3eYQI/ltDdbT1D5ct1ZYEhS66P19jP9YwjbWh6htHGZ+Ey2VEkl tnGXF6w2lu228qKijflvCiS8DFAsdHqf8UYPKAOF1PLu1gXGH8b1UO10Hod7p3sqAqK6 l9H7gIojks7Svw1+BecnbTBJ6bX7NukzCQvcBAYZ1hpUt0rFrqIRPoRBcpqF9KsLMl0z u13g== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwOPKEkRoy2sZKHRTxqKGebJINX0Rr3bVnOb5/t5NYFl+VKg+TtmPWtUTPj3tICqQeC1NBZG4Ai1fp4ELw== X-Received: by 10.55.197.134 with SMTP id k6mr4978445qkl.243.1472237805282; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:56:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.55.23.158 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:56:44 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: ken@pogocheats.net From: Ken Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 11:56:44 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Maintainership Status for PHP 5.6 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 18:56:46 -0000 Hey guys, It's been a week since PHP 5.6.25 was released and it still has not hit the ports system. This has been an ongoing problem for quite sometime now. According to freshports commit log, the maintainer for PHP 5.6 hasn't made a commit since November 2015. What exactly is the status of maintainership for this port? Is it time for the maintainership to be reset or changed? Ken From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 26 19:08:43 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6E3CA94D5E for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 19:08:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8E034B1E for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 19:08:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1bdMUe-000Mhw-Od; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 21:08:44 +0200 Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 21:08:44 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: ken@pogocheats.net Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Maintainership Status for PHP 5.6 Message-ID: <20160826190844.GZ96200@home.opsec.eu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 19:08:43 -0000 Hi! > It's been a week since PHP 5.6.25 was released and it still has not hit the > ports system. This has been an ongoing problem for quite sometime now. tz@ has ambitions with php, as he's maintaining php70. Maybe he finds the time... feld@ also worked on some updates. I'm testbuilding 5.6.25 right now. > According to freshports commit log, the maintainer for PHP 5.6 hasn't made > a commit since November 2015. > > What exactly is the status of maintainership for this port? Is it time for > the maintainership to be reset or changed? We all try to move to php70 as fast as possible 8-} About resetting the maintainer, I'll ask around. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 26 19:11:41 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30A80A94EFD for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 19:11:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from host64.kissl.de (host64.kissl.de [213.239.241.64]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "*.shmhost.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ED5B7DEC for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 19:11:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from francos-mbp.homeoffice.local (ipservice-092-208-160-166.092.208.pools.vodafone-ip.de [92.208.160.166]) (Authenticated sender: web104p1) by host64.kissl.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3E0576B7B9; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 21:11:33 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: Maintainership Status for PHP 5.6 From: Franco Fichtner In-Reply-To: <20160826190844.GZ96200@home.opsec.eu> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 21:11:32 +0200 Cc: ken@pogocheats.net, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <691628CA-65F4-4C3A-ACBC-30E94EED3274@lastsummer.de> References: <20160826190844.GZ96200@home.opsec.eu> To: Kurt Jaeger X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at host64.kissl.de X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 19:11:41 -0000 Hi Kurt, > On 26 Aug 2016, at 9:08 PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > > I'm testbuilding 5.6.25 right now. Please please make sure to reset all the php56-* module's port revisions to zero if you do commit. This was missed in the php70 bump. Cheers, Franco From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 26 19:29:02 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86A2FB76107 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 19:29:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf0-x233.google.com (mail-lf0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2328CB7A; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 19:29:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf0-x233.google.com with SMTP id g62so63339687lfe.3; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 12:29:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=m97pig73LcvW2Th2xzlPZvMRWcyp1qGwP9dJQ4cgzhI=; b=dmtYp7Uo1xI2CrzoBZ8lwDiaBqMeDA6jsQanuXeAqh1d/Sv73QU1mk1GIrPrCPcj97 /iCnUCbrAdnUVBkIUpJiKw2jMWF73pVZNMfYiVHNHm+5JboXGTzlD9prgjJdeBpM4Ws8 iA9wTxFhb6hwRRaLWclV/PVgFW4m6e/+wkP8dc3dx7syRN1BUo5lkXfRIvEoPWQkXDya ie5oJYCASfw4UgtbkP9h5pdb4MVVzGcZgwWOurHIE9dB3U2hYaz+eYX33kL900k5wCfk +jhbPam7J2DnOTpnHDVzjOyKnkEgLGrO/Fym60P+AtX5MdVH8/U0K3vlMHdTk8wkZWcj d+uA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=m97pig73LcvW2Th2xzlPZvMRWcyp1qGwP9dJQ4cgzhI=; b=UqCjhWXREtxKMfPDx5Om9o0hxJcTs1qFejMeOUtu/fTVlqcpS2RzOJ+jCPp02p7mkV ANyM7q3IPj+YsMzKzL6TGiesweHJV0WnEC99aWDnu/omlrGLLyhFlAX1gNKpPbppxsp5 IBzgoZUJM6METAV151WCuUft/7a/C3C+lqkjwhkO95jjgyag34E9DAYcDzSbyrwYc31t n1eeBQ75JcJw90Kg2P0uud5zbs+sjD0HsJG89h05wUwxY5bwUvMR5o+T5PiMgh+U8Y4x viPof1wI93cm+/nrHX8jnmGm9p5MAS6bq2UWaawp6G5mgnrf1N7d1/sUOit8fhE0QyCQ qIVQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNfGb4K3vSMUAM4IsBiLj2dl/kLeZCTiM3UXwLciOEDGTvPIUwEJVeVL59AMTVFLw== X-Received: by 10.25.44.71 with SMTP id s68mr2273618lfs.197.1472239739976; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 12:28:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 67sm4297796ljj.8.2016.08.26.12.28.58 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 26 Aug 2016 12:28:58 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 21:28:57 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Kurt Jaeger Cc: ken@pogocheats.net, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, ale@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Maintainership Status for PHP 5.6 Message-ID: <20160826192857.ctbllvuhrdriy5zu@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20160826190844.GZ96200@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="obvdjlpti7r5pu2s" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160826190844.GZ96200@home.opsec.eu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.2-neo (2016-08-08) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 19:29:02 -0000 --obvdjlpti7r5pu2s Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 09:08:44PM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! >=20 > > It's been a week since PHP 5.6.25 was released and it still has not hit= the > > ports system. This has been an ongoing problem for quite sometime now. >=20 > tz@ has ambitions with php, as he's maintaining php70. Maybe > he finds the time... >=20 > feld@ also worked on some updates. >=20 > I'm testbuilding 5.6.25 right now. >=20 > > According to freshports commit log, the maintainer for PHP 5.6 hasn't m= ade > > a commit since November 2015. > >=20 > > What exactly is the status of maintainership for this port? Is it time = for > > the maintainership to be reset or changed? >=20 > We all try to move to php70 as fast as possible 8-} >=20 > About resetting the maintainer, I'll ask around. >=20 The rules are pretty clear: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/makefile-maintainer.h= tml Beside that the maintainer being active the best would be to talk to him :) (I have CCed him) Best regards, Bapt --obvdjlpti7r5pu2s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXwJh5AAoJEGOJi9zxtz5acxEQAOUGNLN5Ae0tyYAKXLwUhV8I bCFv+DlouYGlzY7y+2KmsCDedIo+3THD4XHrk3zmm5vhkx4VY2q0+adsTP8TXQml /nxDgKE2Ghpf+AL7BFrF5yXwUz7yuyAk4P8aHVyCbUi5lCwBTQjlEnkwdkdh4HdS BwsF/J3oygk/2Jm27ctpbPihA3S+wL8CVN37tYp/VNVZRdwA7HHv2fPUMPR7sDd1 TQjxl0hORQSKqkWbIkMibwIuZ46QHaJaraI0cIdz5L/YyrajbFen97pxlab1l7G0 3jzy7YTJcSISkCERVO6It89AhbIrb77qeHgGjUHytmV86YCPPaMVS9O+MIZA/Meo 1mVQ3aOayzVnOibi9zxe2wnqWjqPjAuD3OLWcuUQ8BFd95Js8vXei/DUEF4PvLSU H0FZHYLhB4dJzKGVHKmw9YVnxMxXL9bfhPRhdcn8INE5L2cJC5Z72i1GWpWFfHcU /Ue6ZDO0wByIzXoEPHmazzKtRu36lP6khVozXe54lS2433+zvwkSDxs5bDCusZVw OqPnoKYGaFOB+LwrNH+IMIMNW1ErPnGzGkRxV+a9qF8vDbIOw3NXzalj9vIRjLYg NWlwrtzLsrSEHO3eC/dZjFMTOLPki7B5hVRNlEQnqG1x6K1gJ+ryO42uhtqLXLeV Ilru2HdAVpiHKaZrjejM =Ql2g -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --obvdjlpti7r5pu2s-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 26 19:38:20 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF878B76341 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 19:38:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CBBDF72; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 19:38:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1bdMxL-000Mlt-Py; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 21:38:23 +0200 Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 21:38:23 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Baptiste Daroussin Cc: ken@pogocheats.net, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, ale@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Maintainership Status for PHP 5.6 Message-ID: <20160826193823.GA96200@home.opsec.eu> References: <20160826190844.GZ96200@home.opsec.eu> <20160826192857.ctbllvuhrdriy5zu@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160826192857.ctbllvuhrdriy5zu@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 19:38:20 -0000 Hi! > > About resetting the maintainer, I'll ask around. > The rules are pretty clear: > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/makefile-maintainer.html It's more about: Who's willing to do it ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 26 20:07:04 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20DDCB76D01 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 20:07:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD9142848 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 20:07:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1bdNP9-000MoX-50; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 22:07:07 +0200 Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 22:07:07 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: ken@pogocheats.net, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Maintainership Status for PHP 5.6 Message-ID: <20160826200707.GB96200@home.opsec.eu> References: <20160826190844.GZ96200@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160826190844.GZ96200@home.opsec.eu> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 20:07:04 -0000 Hi! > I'm testbuilding 5.6.25 right now. A patch is at https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212183 -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 4 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 26 22:21:24 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93496B76199 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 22:21:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rcarter@pinyon.org) Received: from h2.pinyon.org (h2.pinyon.org [65.101.5.250]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67E09C4A for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 22:21:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rcarter@pinyon.org) Received: by h2.pinyon.org (Postfix, from userid 58) id 20AC237152; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 15:21:17 -0700 (MST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=pinyon.org; s=DKIM; t=1472250077; bh=7+2KqrraVGvr8RirtuWFWCtmpbvRtK1XWv2kNfgu4Pw=; h=To:From:Subject:Date; b=BuSdzsGIIMHkogxRPTYteqCzGYmXNs6YpnUECJqrN2VtOu6NYCjIYZKlyvNyc/Y2W 810/IPnWbqH7F03Haf4pf5wrLJV6ELYvkrjd36MDgcg+P7kLRgvK8F3Hj+rk+6jhPw tdppIT9SjP0ZQ1pZCE9tYTktfdhz1eS4gm3xrFuQ= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on h2.pinyon.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from [10.0.10.15] (h4.esturion.net [65.101.5.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by h2.pinyon.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 80BC93714A for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2016 15:21:16 -0700 (MST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=pinyon.org; s=DKIM; t=1472250076; bh=7+2KqrraVGvr8RirtuWFWCtmpbvRtK1XWv2kNfgu4Pw=; h=To:From:Subject:Date; b=QkNWP55dCTfmyx8q6w0v+RGByPudR7yBDat7/nhRFs0xdviCcp9JdtdTm5Byrl3YU YNzY0Otmlg6cDi262GhXmF8eky/XtUfHAWJ0DY67R0MV8X04fYgowed9Nf/qasynK7 aw+4/DeS9Ll8Tter5l1Torp3bIw33/QcyTBTicDI= To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: "Russell L. Carter" Subject: Forcing poudriere to rebuild a package and all dependencies Message-ID: <58f20db2-7d41-ee44-0ab3-0c57f638eee3@pinyon.org> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 15:21:16 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 22:21:24 -0000 Hi, So I'm in the middle of jumping a herd of 6 boxen from 10.3 to 11, and I can't find how to update necessary ports modules such as, but not limited to, the several nvidia kernel modules. This information does not appear to be googleable, so let's correct that. Here's my /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/make.conf, which is indeed appended at the beginning of a poudriere bulk run: WITH_OPENSSL_PORT= yes OPENSSL_PORT= security/openssl DEFAULT_VERSIONS=pgsql=9.5 php=7.0 # Set this to the list of ports you wish to rebuild every time the # kernel is built. PORTS_MODULES=nvidia-driver-340 nvidia-driver virtualbox-ose-kmod sysutils/vm-bhyve sysutils/pefs-kmod DISABLE_LICENSES=yes Simply rm'ing the package file does not work. Ideas? Otherwise, the upgrade is going fairly smoothly, kudos to the team. I've had worse experiences with apt-get. Thanks, Russell From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Aug 27 05:44:36 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6EF2B76423 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 05:44:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bdrewery@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA3F88DF; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 05:44:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bdrewery@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.xzibition.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A558C1B85; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 05:44:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bdrewery@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.xzibition.com (localhost [172.31.3.2]) by mail.xzibition.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59CD22463C; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 05:44:36 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.xzibition.com Received: from mail.xzibition.com ([172.31.3.2]) by mail.xzibition.com (mail.xzibition.com [172.31.3.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with LMTP id dD9pdlYOAnrF; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 05:44:32 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: Forcing poudriere to rebuild a package and all dependencies DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 mail.xzibition.com 6D8E424637 To: "Russell L. Carter" , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <58f20db2-7d41-ee44-0ab3-0c57f638eee3@pinyon.org> From: Bryan Drewery Openpgp: id=F9173CB2C3AAEA7A5C8A1F0935D771BB6E4697CF; url=http://www.shatow.net/bryan/bryan2.asc Organization: FreeBSD Message-ID: <3abcb39d-5d57-ae77-9e9a-6c4e30d4c107@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2016 22:44:31 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <58f20db2-7d41-ee44-0ab3-0c57f638eee3@pinyon.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2AfRvxAalhSSMCo6UVwc6EE6FAEjPvTOc" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 05:44:36 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --2AfRvxAalhSSMCo6UVwc6EE6FAEjPvTOc Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="C0EO0cqsxv6N01aFjMnep6l4jqixsOoek" From: Bryan Drewery To: "Russell L. Carter" , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <3abcb39d-5d57-ae77-9e9a-6c4e30d4c107@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Forcing poudriere to rebuild a package and all dependencies References: <58f20db2-7d41-ee44-0ab3-0c57f638eee3@pinyon.org> In-Reply-To: <58f20db2-7d41-ee44-0ab3-0c57f638eee3@pinyon.org> --C0EO0cqsxv6N01aFjMnep6l4jqixsOoek Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 8/26/2016 3:21 PM, Russell L. Carter wrote: > Hi, >=20 > So I'm in the middle of jumping a herd of 6 boxen from 10.3 to 11, and Upgrading/Replacing a poudriere jail from 10.3 to 11 normally would rebuild all packages since there would either be no packages in the new jail (if using a name such as 10-amd64 and 11-amd64), or it would rebuild all packages for the major version updating (if you used a simple jail name like 'foo'). So I'm not sure how you don't have all packages rebuilding in that case. How did you upgrade your jail from 10.3 to 11? > I can't find how to update necessary ports modules such as, but not > limited to, the several nvidia kernel modules. This information does > not appear to be googleable, so let's correct that. >=20 > Here's my /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/make.conf, which is indeed > appended at the beginning of a poudriere bulk run: >=20 > WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=3D yes > OPENSSL_PORT=3D security/openssl > DEFAULT_VERSIONS=3Dpgsql=3D9.5 php=3D7.0 > # Set this to the list of ports you wish to rebuild every time the > # kernel is built. > PORTS_MODULES=3Dnvidia-driver-340 nvidia-driver virtualbox-ose-kmod > sysutils/vm-bhyve sysutils/pefs-kmod > DISABLE_LICENSES=3Dyes >=20 > Simply rm'ing the package file does not work. Ideas? Otherwise, the > upgrade is going fairly smoothly, kudos to the team. I've had worse > experiences with apt-get. >=20 > Thanks, > Russell > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " --=20 Regards, Bryan Drewery --C0EO0cqsxv6N01aFjMnep6l4jqixsOoek-- --2AfRvxAalhSSMCo6UVwc6EE6FAEjPvTOc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJXwSi/AAoJEDXXcbtuRpfPKlAH/31emEBhB1bAZB5aB7X2TX1/ pPwkyEvjvuDvXtKn/iaXka7jDttqnA6UPdynrm92Tn2nm8s6+RhrcoHENldKFv49 cg4FSesXv4bDMmzdU9gKgydOiX+qw7eKkBid2fW5i+6IbwYut9aJm9pqcCZnf+19 438l4nUXOB1pJ3WfBxWXOD3FV3ia0nCVphCPiFrDK84ZNhXBTIwaJNg/NBr7sq1z 343bZK6zs7tSImxbeyRklpPb/S2Z59bAssajwG9AZmqTGoSGWtK6qdqwM50XoNAG yyUuxxZtUpzpc4LOFsV2Yy0Oghv/XWBvsNzH8tVtUpqoOZLbPwYSVZnAy5Bpsd4= =tOF/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2AfRvxAalhSSMCo6UVwc6EE6FAEjPvTOc-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Aug 27 07:59:17 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35096B760B2 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 07:59:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-x232.google.com (mail-pa0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04F10A0D for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 07:59:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pa0-x232.google.com with SMTP id hb8so34048184pac.2 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 00:59:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:reply-to:subject:references:to:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=EZdzz9XwHddS7BB7nQoz/43GceOw/T1JWJtHFiMkGe8=; b=g1B/+d3vZbZJLgS6oe/bS72BoIU6f397uYr+nTg4RV4StstjRvw9igYu1fjWK5V4pO nVTXTE+sG42T1Y9HpgajaUmNWm1hxzME7GEhIUAmOrjhWb4Bt86ElGKVzaGNYMvcH/QN GOxzUEyvkr6Rhi4Aj5wMI81Oq1DoXW0MprpK9gpVg1wm332Ubbw/31JZWm93sPspZQlC TMfJkn6seijYYAfo/58WSQfQdm2iG9Ww14kiAy2xvicA9G+qtzmVVbsoWc6diwixT6qB ZQMv0XdlW/Oa4W/skcXcCcGTA8klkMP+sJoXSAE/2SaqnjXxRUYgersR3rVDMG0MEOVP KwvQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:reply-to:subject:references:to:from :message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to :content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=EZdzz9XwHddS7BB7nQoz/43GceOw/T1JWJtHFiMkGe8=; b=SMxoDk2mc0glgfdPrvDPZTCaoFLGH/7gaCIQ2UOr7R28ano3Z/eYdNcXvlXRCf/0Pt WvcF7MlZbTIjmEkzmFWJh7GujWRzoI1tZT2pwXNOUng9IMsKY1615okI7hTdFHCmzYwE EJ0j4r0AgmAYPV7gPfv+46gy8Y1xXYS3Td58GgvOwa60UitnpWkJT+1+3SmRGhhACeSu J5gx+D6w2QEc0MdczxYWu0bKS7Qr+6mgh9ccEcVKMY/TGtK8uINj5G1uLPKy1KGzyAPg zYyAGnCeIX711hqha1w+e5WrUsJD4FmNkpgmyLFCkuU65S/+DmxcWlsZofELF/nGmG7Z NHUQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwOktDNFvDt4L3AzljRckh3b/PuA7CqkqaaH/KwQ3Z5PYuoBQSMWFtvDRblscQwG7w== X-Received: by 10.66.189.199 with SMTP id gk7mr13351856pac.158.1472284756294; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 00:59:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:44b8:31ae:7b01:1c1a:5103:265d:bfaf? (2001-44b8-31ae-7b01-1c1a-5103-265d-bfaf.static.ipv6.internode.on.net. [2001:44b8:31ae:7b01:1c1a:5103:265d:bfaf]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 75sm33867841pfw.92.2016.08.27.00.59.14 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 27 Aug 2016 00:59:15 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Kubilay Kocak Reply-To: koobs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Gimp 2.8.18,2 plugins not working under 10.3 References: <201608221107.u7MB7PHn082859@gw.catspoiler.org> To: scratch65535@att.net, freebsd-ports From: Kubilay Kocak Message-ID: Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 17:59:07 +1000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:50.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/50.0a2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-AU Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 07:59:17 -0000 On 27/08/2016 4:42 AM, scratch65535@att.net wrote: > [Default] On Mon, 22 Aug 2016 04:07:25 -0700 (PDT), Don Lewis > wrote: > >> >> sysctl kern.ipc.shm_allow_removed=1 > > That seems to have done the trick. Thanks! > > I hope the maintainer fixes the problem more generally, though. This is the tracking issue for it: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=206097 In the absence of another way to permanent fix/workaround the issue, we may need to wrap the gimp binary in a script to set --no-shm I'll have a look around for other alternatives, but if anyone else finds or knows of one, reply on this thread ./koobs From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Aug 27 10:25:38 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A455A93960 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 10:25:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (mx3.absolight.net [IPv6:2a01:678:2:100::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37485D3C for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 10:25:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF4A1BDC98; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 12:25:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from atuin.in.mat.cc (atuin.in.mat.cc [79.143.241.205]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id AE481BDC44; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 12:25:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atuin.in.mat.cc (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65D9D6CF3EF0; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 12:25:35 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 12:25:35 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold To: "Russell L. Carter" , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Forcing poudriere to rebuild a package and all dependencies Message-ID: <76E2C13BF6B466ADF5F3AC15@atuin.in.mat.cc> In-Reply-To: <58f20db2-7d41-ee44-0ab3-0c57f638eee3@pinyon.org> References: <58f20db2-7d41-ee44-0ab3-0c57f638eee3@pinyon.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="==========B83239FF2F06856A92E3==========" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 10:25:38 -0000 --==========B83239FF2F06856A92E3========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline +--On 26 ao=C3=BBt 2016 15:21:16 -0700 "Russell L. Carter" = wrote: | WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=3D yes | OPENSSL_PORT=3D security/openssl | DEFAULT_VERSIONS=3Dpgsql=3D9.5 php=3D7.0 This should be: DEFAULT_VERSIONS=3Dpgsql=3D9.5 php=3D7.0 ssl=3Dopenssl I'm sure all the ports using openssl are telling you this when you're building them :-) --=20 Mathieu Arnold --==========B83239FF2F06856A92E3========== Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJXwWqfXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQzQUI2OTc4OUQyRUQxMjEwNjQ0MEJBNUIz QTQ1MTZGMzUxODNDRTQ4AAoJEDpFFvNRg85IDaMP/019JJgYoEDKQTW4eTJGpM79 e2iwI7cVtYjLAnOU7LL5cEOxM6fKsrLYpc7T7tJo4QjVuIRQ7JipO49/yNCSfaVU T9/wS9xfxENxhpjffWqdhX2ZH5hsNRT3i6qHHmzW0S0e/9veNJQZ000TDOChSjgp 0ATFOwjUxx9LsRr7rY7Qmkuf+meIzl9T/YO3mequCoHTBdehH8Ks4M5nuYCVYhYi 6GiAHwiHSpazbTCoTTr6sp4tN+4/hNJZtTqvSYR686AV6OsJ/BAKshZX8g0AdIj6 q9AvtKUjlt25BqIv1ehNGLvNpCCJR5BMN3IrsE0g/CImh4aKtpcIhd0jmi+b/J2I uN+eKDsQRwtbfXPKDs9FZXs5gxG3NJMpSDPCb74sSw7k8mzJ7IklfFbzf/sHscp5 rkRxglNS9zk+PFTlqrzd3imGFK6QY92GjFEwrCyAdADuaWuKA7IMnb40PcoLJz0r 2hZixn7kdQMbs+4pFUBOBkCj9gXgYib+Te88JJpu5BPrXCCbT5zgcPPwX6lUYaKS pJGBNNbgtugLuEEuazPFc+/gnAaz9VSRSXsgOuV8BXoUZJ3FYCE9+wKfmqlg1Xwt BYO2Kh7xxwBFUfNX5MuBX5zb3zDwoNIywARlhIsBQrwWD39PlfL6bPWD/wLEr7Bp nMKV8NqIKsxFH8RPlmIB =smEj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==========B83239FF2F06856A92E3==========-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Aug 27 10:57:03 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74C79B765D3 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 10:57:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kubito@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x232.google.com (mail-wm0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E57C163 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 10:57:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kubito@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x232.google.com with SMTP id i5so25266089wmg.0 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 03:57:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=WHf2JvZ3bGNXrlEcUrMTWgHbT80JQbR9A3kFxdVx+YM=; b=BQeofIhEPgoTG0kHZELvtCL6x6VRD+dDBU6UWpSKphLVeIBGxUf5Ft5oEodfE4ZI0s zSOh64Yc9OzYOcOWcDcs9J85wSoMXIEG7Zj+uldYplv5KIvzqrB4KGl3wI2jdff7toNU JhsaTaUpRPx0D9MojAV5tzFvMb8s0SMR+WTGtX0Qoq8UJy0IOt9UuNUZRKTG7mWOiYxV MD0hJtNz/+iUp1P3FJWY81juyjyDa5x1naTdgI1NtIs46PcTI6DMqlJZLLo0VP6qHUBZ F41KebpxUwq5Wj59Wdy4V5TutxkDERC/3Z/Kfvt9KoFIKSX7I4rcLW82kDyRV9PFdh6D NAXQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=WHf2JvZ3bGNXrlEcUrMTWgHbT80JQbR9A3kFxdVx+YM=; b=H/nPLSJrNiJicJ7OKvRRfxsoPdnH2JYB89ak1nu2IAfc7o9luj6vnL9VXGjzDjju5Z VqsfYWU/5FXq/lViOIFh0mMgl9IGJ8K7ujQqgOMM+Kji+zA9Z1ltc7Ztdh+vdCH+pquM WazCzfKi+J/z5cPR2FEN7Av/AJvXRol5F1L6hUTIdAM3TOQ+g7PDausIdk/ZpyOX6MPf 46hHsuIsNhOx4PPoMzYzBG4L1PqvAXgfv7xjQ7tHpyC09jpWEgwrX/bMqSRLfghTbrfj GG7qWp0aC4VQFlTcEPr2Vv9UjDsHEYF2cgqG9LvO7fzcAnounjWadu9e9i4Rwh/G5h64 auNg== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwPB1Ol7zCVZXAd3Crpju5ErRS7MoAWjMvwi3lVlJVfoZSNlghVYeiNVdagkANkUaA== X-Received: by 10.194.164.229 with SMTP id yt5mr7966782wjb.39.1472295421348; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 03:57:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orwell.gmail.com (dhcp-077-248-147-050.chello.nl. [77.248.147.50]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e65sm3308584wmg.3.2016.08.27.03.57.00 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 27 Aug 2016 03:57:00 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Raphael Kubo da Costa From: Raphael Kubo da Costa To: "Russell L. Carter" Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fontconfig update uglifies fonts References: <729af4af-0ed3-4d45-2e68-b4483e08110a@pinyon.org> Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 12:56:53 +0200 In-Reply-To: <729af4af-0ed3-4d45-2e68-b4483e08110a@pinyon.org> (Russell L. Carter's message of "Mon, 22 Aug 2016 17:01:33 -0700") Message-ID: <8660qmh43u.fsf@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 10:57:03 -0000 "Russell L. Carter" writes: > Hi, > > On 10/stable amd64, the recent fontconfig update makes the fonts used > in thunderbird, firefox, (u)xterm, and emacs quite a bit uglier. The > font strokes seem to be thicker and fuzzier. Emacs I fixed by > reinstalling bitstream-vera, but (u)xterm use that and they're still > broken. I ran fc-cache -f, but no change. I turned off antialiasing > via /usr/local/etc/fonts/local.conf and that made the strokes nice and > thin but overall even uglier. > > Any ideas/pointers on how to fix this? This is likely caused by the fact that the new fontconfig version allows one to choose the default hinting style and defaults to "slight"; from your description it looks like were used to a different value. You can either change the HINTING option when building the port or create a ~/.config/fontconfig/fonts.conf with something like this: hintnone From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Aug 27 11:01:24 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79591B767DC for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 11:01:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kubito@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x22d.google.com (mail-wm0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DB053F8 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 11:01:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kubito@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id q128so21689543wma.1 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 04:01:23 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=4w85mDWdAJn3U/tubXxP/rOMV7xP1F5tLFJ5dVRN04g=; b=IhZN8bnHq/jAdok73l8wuMctDZllTb/Plxj3Y7SZnJA3G/PyhEpp6ewRrsp0jyFJtO 7agc5KHM3nFGRYWGLCZtPWPA2SuaHFNZ4hrwS934oNtKJBTjAVTfXGaIpcSjbIAThkNc ezfyJAxKT1VT80ZmznOWUeNen8W1j6EggqEkRqFTB56v/ie6tSLEF6HxSXxQ49nw52oI eWrZU6VOL6UaSN3KH+0DHWtWDTsqOBCnvuvkKFxNtmWCmxlos2Bo3GhxOt7/eCGX/AYL u0P5xXhDSx2FB2JDi0XWHnw/kjW9m4QjziDzDawxQA8S9yG9YUiVesXOPHpDjT8BsQdR y+zA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=4w85mDWdAJn3U/tubXxP/rOMV7xP1F5tLFJ5dVRN04g=; b=RhCeD1NfdDzDV7HEAQO6c/vaaj42MPn5hvj2aWdcWET3KiRmbUm4YZRc1RQHV9RaTe /ujgYu0rE+l26dOCj3QX9+tRFJJrhmrF4B4ytWvUXeN/wmHwmgMCxP4IuKljthxlOcN8 xUa0O9+Pktw3uPw5fi1MsKWvnZKiCQo8Ds9wRK/j0PE965pXyMrIA8SHzwBsoTyhZL3V x8Z2NmRE6ITrEqhYukSGzD2eAaxp8WAN8wZjuQqzMDaE/E2c2IV2pyNjzKlwp6z9aFlM gVGYP4MBq1uqOzez+2lIM27kxV9QcbIzONtybKP8lsNBt8HPQigKQEVLa5mX/GTQj+yN +WFQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwNnTYhg78SO4CzhAy6+U7w5oR3U+JzAKqhW+qy54mPlYskEgbR5x8yAkYlVjXQAVA== X-Received: by 10.194.200.198 with SMTP id ju6mr2088670wjc.184.1472295682591; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 04:01:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from orwell.gmail.com (dhcp-077-248-147-050.chello.nl. [77.248.147.50]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g1sm24215071wjy.5.2016.08.27.04.01.21 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 27 Aug 2016 04:01:22 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Raphael Kubo da Costa From: Raphael Kubo da Costa To: "Russell L. Carter" Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fontconfig update uglifies fonts References: <729af4af-0ed3-4d45-2e68-b4483e08110a@pinyon.org> <8660qmh43u.fsf@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 13:01:20 +0200 In-Reply-To: <8660qmh43u.fsf@FreeBSD.org> (Raphael Kubo da Costa's message of "Sat, 27 Aug 2016 12:56:53 +0200") Message-ID: <861t1ah3wf.fsf@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 11:01:24 -0000 Raphael Kubo da Costa writes: > You can either change the HINTING option when building the port or > create a ~/.config/fontconfig/fonts.conf with something like this: > > > > > > > hintnone > > > "hintnone" was just an example and is likely the opposite of what you want. In your specific case you probably need "hintmedium" or "hintfull". From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Aug 27 11:02:27 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1297B76848 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 11:02:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abi@abinet.ru) Received: from mail.abinet.ru (mail.abinet.ru [136.243.72.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 953BD862 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 11:02:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abi@abinet.ru) Received: from sphinx.abinet.ru (host-54-159-66-217.spbmts.ru [217.66.159.54]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.abinet.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F3A9EF11 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 11:02:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=abinet.ru; s=dkim; t=1472295745; bh=y62VqGjo8PGOZeJGojvrNvcyJiTDkArpJQI0K3hABUc=; h=From:Subject:To:Date; b=Jx/keUrlIib33ZGpVbAkDgPU9MKTkuPp97oYKxiM4ti0WNP4lk1mxTooGf2404K7P MBViqLw0Sea3lLG1zpPJvEe2/j9xbKO5xjyVqzv1cl3dJiHcpTokL8xpK2+6oVcR5c zxf8Ntxz949bQY27exrdiG+qr9VyniTWk9o54x/I= From: abi Subject: graphics/zathura links against sysutils/file To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <776ec4f6-d530-90df-1c59-2634e8b063a4@abinet.ru> Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 14:02:23 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,T_DKIM_INVALID, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=disabled version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Report: * -1.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0005] * 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY Informational: message has unparseable relay lines * 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on postfix.abinet.ru X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 11:02:27 -0000 Hello again! graphics/zathura has sysutils/file in LIB_DEPENDS for libmagic.so However we already have this lib in base since FreeBSD 7.0 zathura links to external one and somehow confuses pkg. pkg autoremove suggests to remove sysutils/file, breaking zathura. After I removed sysutils/file from port Makefile, it linked to the base lib. The thing that confuses me is that in poudriere zathura links correctly, but 11 jail there is rather outdated. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Aug 27 13:56:16 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAA98B76324 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 13:56:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from mail.infocus-llc.com (mail.infocus-llc.com [199.15.120.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D5F0B20 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 13:56:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from draco.over-yonder.net (c-75-65-60-66.hsd1.ms.comcast.net [75.65.60.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.tarragon.infocus-llc.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3sLzjb6Dqfz16v; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 08:46:59 -0500 (CDT) Received: by draco.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id 3sLzjb1Ld7z29j; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 08:46:59 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 08:46:59 -0500 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: "Russell L. Carter" Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Forcing poudriere to rebuild a package and all dependencies Message-ID: <20160827134659.GT79735@over-yonder.net> References: <58f20db2-7d41-ee44-0ab3-0c57f638eee3@pinyon.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <58f20db2-7d41-ee44-0ab3-0c57f638eee3@pinyon.org> X-Editor: vi X-OS: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1-fullermd.4 (2016-04-27) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 13:56:16 -0000 On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 03:21:16PM -0700 I heard the voice of Russell L. Carter, and lo! it spake thus: > > Here's my /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/make.conf, [...] > [...] > # Set this to the list of ports you wish to rebuild every time the > # kernel is built. > PORTS_MODULES=nvidia-driver-340 nvidia-driver virtualbox-ose-kmod > sysutils/vm-bhyve sysutils/pefs-kmod Incidentally, PORTS_MODULES is a var used by the _kernel_ build, not anything in the _ports_, so setting it in the poudriere environment doesn't do anything. -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Aug 27 14:11:02 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E92DBB769C6 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 14:11:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from t@tobik.me) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD802352 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 14:11:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from t@tobik.me) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id CCE41B769C3; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 14:11:02 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC924B769C2 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 14:11:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from t@tobik.me) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4EFF350 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 14:11:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from t@tobik.me) Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F8EC20565; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 10:11:01 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web2 ([10.202.2.212]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 27 Aug 2016 10:11:01 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tobik.me; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-sasl-enc :x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=hRYrSUSS98xWpk9rcpmNt8u/lb8=; b=Hcrvnc FdbcrN7auH25NBBZSNkNwRinCQq0JK/RF0cjBvt8xAs8z79AKLhYVc4dfQOZpIo7 F7M21YnqCzVVXaiGOpnFuGxho5er1RZIc2kzlyFbeTZQxXrVfyQqw2VG4lOvElfe pZGC6sbVIC+XFeb3oCUG4FhNqhkGH3Uu1lZn0= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=hRYrSUSS98xWpk9 rcpmNt8u/lb8=; b=MB/IZBnv1B9l8bt/fQj1bMZNVolFqCk5YQNFAPFpUTeU9RJ d8mxZB/2xyhxRu0pOJhhc3h8xnjUZC+JPgybJCpGlxuG6Z0leUwC6NJCXeBNa88E gP1v9lDHaZ1vh4qmWOJ6vxHy3NjHxml3haYl/vKGwseTAOXaWZt5Yi3ZDoDE= Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 030A9D01C5; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 10:11:00 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1472307060.1636801.707783593.178A5B1C@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: lXMRhEGxDqc6eHlj+3RkM6qHk/+jhJLtEf3SIflUkFgH 1472307060 From: Tobias Kortkamp To: Kurt Jaeger , ports@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-5778c97d Subject: Re: Committers needed Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 16:11:00 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20160826141017.GY96200@home.opsec.eu> References: <1472191295.1829334.706642825.27EC806F@webmail.messagingengine.com> <20160826095312.GX96200@home.opsec.eu> <20160826141017.GY96200@home.opsec.eu> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 14:11:03 -0000 On Fri, Aug 26, 2016, at 16:10, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/211663 > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/211664 > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/211573 > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/211624 > > Done, with 211624 pending MFH. Thanks for taking care of all of them! > Tobias, does the change from 211624 mean that we can close the > two PRs 154502 191296 as fixed with a reference to 211624 ? > > That's my take, but I'd like to have some confirmation before I closed > them as fixed. Seeing as the proposed solutions in those PRs is the same as PR211624 I would say yes to closing them too. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Aug 27 16:10:58 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE386B76C66 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 16:10:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rcarter@pinyon.org) Received: from h2.pinyon.org (h2.pinyon.org [65.101.5.250]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFB30FC for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 16:10:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rcarter@pinyon.org) Received: by h2.pinyon.org (Postfix, from userid 58) id 067F3CA96; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 09:10:57 -0700 (MST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=pinyon.org; s=DKIM; t=1472314257; bh=/XeK6Pxrkg/H7iGXWFh1jNTSEnhW1JDT2Ta4o3XCTPs=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=k2fAVBcIrSIGBggxAKbo7qZT2orzW4Dlr2/mLnR9H8uzife320yLOGiUd/uIi7gAW FyanrdpkN4KdxNKLy2WxfqlLj8BubA7IBTtL+ANQmrydy4NW5UVsvJe+uq07Y63BeU y3ADCrR9DBvGF4xly0Cb19pNr/nrgYW9oxf8wADM= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on h2.pinyon.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from [10.0.10.15] (h4.esturion.net [65.101.5.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by h2.pinyon.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FFCACA8D; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 09:10:56 -0700 (MST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=pinyon.org; s=DKIM; t=1472314256; bh=/XeK6Pxrkg/H7iGXWFh1jNTSEnhW1JDT2Ta4o3XCTPs=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=J0JW4Wa3mJBHEIs1XUp8m8CmqB4qHhNJL7b+5tQDkBvS4vMcTTxiasyXRTYfU2xG1 YlNPrB9lE4bSirxYFBp7wp5/rAI2lQtYrq5UJB0D6nEeoE/uSBQls9/ETiyoL8/7jN o2ZjMF4hh1qJXl62AxjK47khMfeI753RPwGMmDgk= Subject: Re: Forcing poudriere to rebuild a package and all dependencies To: "Matthew D. Fuller" References: <58f20db2-7d41-ee44-0ab3-0c57f638eee3@pinyon.org> <20160827134659.GT79735@over-yonder.net> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: "Russell L. Carter" Message-ID: Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 09:10:55 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20160827134659.GT79735@over-yonder.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 16:10:59 -0000 On 08/27/16 06:46, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 03:21:16PM -0700 I heard the voice of > Russell L. Carter, and lo! it spake thus: >> >> Here's my /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/make.conf, [...] >> [...] >> # Set this to the list of ports you wish to rebuild every time the >> # kernel is built. >> PORTS_MODULES=nvidia-driver-340 nvidia-driver virtualbox-ose-kmod >> sysutils/vm-bhyve sysutils/pefs-kmod > > Incidentally, PORTS_MODULES is a var used by the _kernel_ build, not > anything in the _ports_, so setting it in the poudriere environment > doesn't do anything. > > Hmm, ok. How would a kernel build know anything at all about building a specific port? I'm apparently missing something... Thanks, Russell From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Aug 27 16:15:13 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 788D7B76DDB for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 16:15:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rcarter@pinyon.org) Received: from h2.pinyon.org (h2.pinyon.org [65.101.5.250]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44AC43B7; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 16:15:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rcarter@pinyon.org) Received: by h2.pinyon.org (Postfix, from userid 58) id 4E35ECAC4; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 09:15:12 -0700 (MST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=pinyon.org; s=DKIM; t=1472314512; bh=REWnvyB5ca0hA0DuU/TIbEiPyE0ndefe9DgQFi+IUgU=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=rDxunXpePU7wC0q9yR4RhiMGgESsJhf0grXQ1r/t88YOrKeoseEMojas+oBfYkXNe JFzl7vSal1v11eMWa7sy82GNNcmCZmhxW2cJLIJAr10TcNVSd9PNAL/DN7xcxP+19G GUka7WiB5KMKBHWdTi04pRJ06xgDdMQLU+/5PgB0= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on h2.pinyon.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from [10.0.10.15] (h4.esturion.net [65.101.5.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by h2.pinyon.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BB09BCABD; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 09:15:11 -0700 (MST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=pinyon.org; s=DKIM; t=1472314511; bh=REWnvyB5ca0hA0DuU/TIbEiPyE0ndefe9DgQFi+IUgU=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=gnNjEj8taYs3c5j1kS6lYCDDwm6s0tO5zPYmbIJR7qwDI6Vuxd0clvGhu8kNS7aCP Ucn5XSDVvqLfs+0t2mdAMYTPh6JCozggZ1B+QKhDV0zQGemk6jeC+qifXnMU9xhWKs UR8hDY8lt3aASQg1JQeagwElS/sd4fYpQ2leqlHc= Subject: Re: fontconfig update uglifies fonts To: Raphael Kubo da Costa References: <729af4af-0ed3-4d45-2e68-b4483e08110a@pinyon.org> <8660qmh43u.fsf@FreeBSD.org> <861t1ah3wf.fsf@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: "Russell L. Carter" Message-ID: Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 09:15:11 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <861t1ah3wf.fsf@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 16:15:13 -0000 On 08/27/16 04:01, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > Raphael Kubo da Costa writes: >> You can either change the HINTING option when building the port or >> create a ~/.config/fontconfig/fonts.conf with something like this: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> hintnone >> >> >> > > "hintnone" was just an example and is likely the opposite of what you > want. In your specific case you probably need "hintmedium" or > "hintfull". > Ah, that's a lot quicker technique than changing the fontconfig option and then rebuilding all the dependent ports. Thanks, Russell From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Aug 27 16:22:24 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6D52B7703B for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 16:22:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rcarter@pinyon.org) Received: from h2.pinyon.org (h2.pinyon.org [65.101.5.250]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B08C79A9; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 16:22:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rcarter@pinyon.org) Received: by h2.pinyon.org (Postfix, from userid 58) id D14E3CB08; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 09:22:23 -0700 (MST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=pinyon.org; s=DKIM; t=1472314943; bh=Q1sEUBBSZXsHSqarRM63Wl63CiNqbmXLFGeQoq28/ps=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=ge3I2FdWIiK7IEbPtpAp8nZgZUBPJN4v7mZX/J6RaUjMs4lmzayfFUeYhh1L9Gnb+ udJF0OGRjWcUs1QR+9rDNhJ0stXYdTVe8UMU/JclBe6j1ewwidcCTCIrDKmvH4Qdtq 1ZMPxT09Xd0ZDxgG1bnr9d0X0Qbei2LUsmJ4z+lQ= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on h2.pinyon.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from [10.0.10.15] (h4.esturion.net [65.101.5.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by h2.pinyon.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 33925CB00; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 09:22:23 -0700 (MST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=pinyon.org; s=DKIM; t=1472314943; bh=Q1sEUBBSZXsHSqarRM63Wl63CiNqbmXLFGeQoq28/ps=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=ge3I2FdWIiK7IEbPtpAp8nZgZUBPJN4v7mZX/J6RaUjMs4lmzayfFUeYhh1L9Gnb+ udJF0OGRjWcUs1QR+9rDNhJ0stXYdTVe8UMU/JclBe6j1ewwidcCTCIrDKmvH4Qdtq 1ZMPxT09Xd0ZDxgG1bnr9d0X0Qbei2LUsmJ4z+lQ= Subject: Re: Forcing poudriere to rebuild a package and all dependencies To: Mathieu Arnold , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <58f20db2-7d41-ee44-0ab3-0c57f638eee3@pinyon.org> <76E2C13BF6B466ADF5F3AC15@atuin.in.mat.cc> From: "Russell L. Carter" Message-ID: Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 09:22:23 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <76E2C13BF6B466ADF5F3AC15@atuin.in.mat.cc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 16:22:24 -0000 On 08/27/16 03:25, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > +--On 26 août 2016 15:21:16 -0700 "Russell L. Carter" > wrote: > | WITH_OPENSSL_PORT= yes > | OPENSSL_PORT= security/openssl > | DEFAULT_VERSIONS=pgsql=9.5 php=7.0 > > This should be: > DEFAULT_VERSIONS=pgsql=9.5 php=7.0 ssl=openssl > > I'm sure all the ports using openssl are telling you this when you're > building them :-) > It seemed to work w/o problems, but I much prefer to stay on the one true path. :-) I've updated, thanks. Best, Russell From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Aug 27 16:59:21 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA1D3B77F29 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 16:59:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it0-x230.google.com (mail-it0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B90D253 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 16:59:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it0-x230.google.com with SMTP id e63so42557456ith.1 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 09:59:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=2nL0D+lRKwXXKFcMoCjiT7hA9XHsuq6scbGq56hk7cU=; b=XIa9jnk1gKeY6j9g44lxzm5KPfckb7EPvB6+xVqPO4pU7nkMido/0u+ghxa4TnPbhp RPKJZLcwN2kI39+CXNYA1XAAtyHqU1ziDN9b8uXrFZRmup3FOvwhlpyn89D5XOh9mUWV OTCwt/w/vO7S28ul0kB2/PXSc1oIOpLzcybUiTfldO3vXstAlNheGl4hEHLDb48rS9q/ 1nkqmgBIYp+52dfMfSG8mxhqR5fWSgwBKwI+1xu5E4yywsOH2WhH7+WdsZpWiAS199zK opb6MF3AZjFnvGDZPR11tKjbfQ22uCWqchKBuI6XoEb4aeVkOG5T7HLDkSK/UvvSMK7p Lv1A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=2nL0D+lRKwXXKFcMoCjiT7hA9XHsuq6scbGq56hk7cU=; b=Q06WICAFk/Z1JR0+smI7Imb6VZSF8cu7T/c4q6192ylbbs4BdWlzVvxocQIXTRF/ZT HGYqsOwpv9TlhLgQa4hKpxRii0ASHjIaQpS5xsDGzS7G5A8AzWXdcya0Z+OQKMX/YEtb pi70MooDijY9YqqcPcFEd6tfKpleF8IR2ZaU9wb9gU7Hswti3a34Z7fCKRs4jsj562XL slFqlATHaWYhAPpAKtU8bP2MkNfqdGt9rWpYBHItQhef39Vf8im1pxsX+xkkQc0BIkVe rgXyKrY3DzDYFdvedtj+e9kf3ZYpBTOK52UuS1EpxH4RV+vBDslxu8Yag5EX24jKW47Z sY0g== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwMAzImbiLi1L3aN0m99s+wojN3BVpDI2iAn2KWWd8Mk/8iwRN2lN13nUNKbTItxlOyFLiNVoSBC0LKmNw== X-Received: by 10.107.129.152 with SMTP id l24mr10771635ioi.179.1472317160842; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 09:59:20 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.79.109.141 with HTTP; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 09:59:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <58f20db2-7d41-ee44-0ab3-0c57f638eee3@pinyon.org> <20160827134659.GT79735@over-yonder.net> From: Kevin Oberman Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 09:59:20 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: W8fABvoQn7BtH01_8FElulKCGjc Message-ID: Subject: Re: Forcing poudriere to rebuild a package and all dependencies To: "Russell L. Carter" Cc: "Matthew D. Fuller" , FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.22 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 16:59:21 -0000 On Sat, Aug 27, 2016 at 9:10 AM, Russell L. Carter wrote: > On 08/27/16 06:46, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 03:21:16PM -0700 I heard the voice of >> Russell L. Carter, and lo! it spake thus: >> >>> >>> Here's my /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/make.conf, [...] >>> [...] >>> # Set this to the list of ports you wish to rebuild every time the >>> # kernel is built. >>> PORTS_MODULES=nvidia-driver-340 nvidia-driver virtualbox-ose-kmod >>> sysutils/vm-bhyve sysutils/pefs-kmod >>> >> >> Incidentally, PORTS_MODULES is a var used by the _kernel_ build, not >> anything in the _ports_, so setting it in the poudriere environment >> doesn't do anything. >> >> >> > Hmm, ok. How would a kernel build know anything at all about building > a specific port? I'm apparently missing something... > > Thanks, > Russell > It doesn't, really. PORT_MODULES simply tells the kernel build to kick off a make for the specified ports. This is intended for ports which build kernel modules that should always be rebuilt for a new kernel. While there is an attempt made to keep the KBI stable within a major release, it isnot realy always possible and, since the KBI is only used by the kernel itself, changes to the KBI were always "safe". But with kernel modules from external sources (i.e. ports), this is no longer true. The result was the PORT_MODULES make variable which causes the kernel install to rebuild the modules listed whenever the kernel is rebuilt. This guarantees that the modules are in sync with the kernel on those occasions when the KBI is changed. It also is relevant to when ports go mucking around in the kernel such as with lsof. My src.conf contains "PORTS_MODULES=emulators/virtualbox-ose-kmod multimedia/cuse4bsd-kmod sysutils/lsof". I might also mention that this fuction is very tricky and gets broken too often. As of about three weeks ago cuse4bsd-kmod fails to build and I also see the PORTS_MODULES are getting built in the buildkernel which seems wrong to me. It used to only take place in installkernel. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Aug 27 23:18:02 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE9C2B77515 for ; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 23:18:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rcarter@pinyon.org) Received: from h2.pinyon.org (h2.pinyon.org [65.101.5.250]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8508C7F7; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 23:18:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rcarter@pinyon.org) Received: by h2.pinyon.org (Postfix, from userid 58) id 80CB5DE24; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 16:18:00 -0700 (MST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=pinyon.org; s=DKIM; t=1472339880; bh=LVWnDefo4A7MM77P7Tp+OsZiJQT2aCS8dZ+MyFo+/U8=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=ePAWSSd22v20on+PLO5sGxXhE6y8emfWIDitJMuvS1+pa/b2kGcugbgybjPhh5/+v zyJasTmiu5hDciitmAoD4VGTV+GRpXyIhcm95fwcphOUwcYjczbNwj/BWRttQipVjz oTYheQs2WBO7HYYNRjH3uCUgLh2xWNlzMZU+Tbh0= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on h2.pinyon.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from [10.0.10.15] (h4.esturion.net [65.101.5.252]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by h2.pinyon.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ECCF0DE1E; Sat, 27 Aug 2016 16:17:59 -0700 (MST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=pinyon.org; s=DKIM; t=1472339879; bh=LVWnDefo4A7MM77P7Tp+OsZiJQT2aCS8dZ+MyFo+/U8=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=Jg5nlGsloEenRI/BRm+4BGz3uUJhoDgpDTr8QhPgH4PG4Huzyho5JPAF23WkWq/CS EVK4eP3WTbthIpNbFVcYO57J/48aN+vY4Fn1gjOY1YgE+++gBGvU1LSSQY+88vmnyX HaT8tsMykhzwFNFCvlTWwd55bzrBbJyHcjhIMlXw= Subject: Re: fontconfig update uglifies fonts To: Raphael Kubo da Costa References: <729af4af-0ed3-4d45-2e68-b4483e08110a@pinyon.org> <8660qmh43u.fsf@FreeBSD.org> <861t1ah3wf.fsf@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: "Russell L. Carter" Message-ID: <9c1c09c8-e829-a86c-5886-ec2fa3f3e706@pinyon.org> Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 16:17:59 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <861t1ah3wf.fsf@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 27 Aug 2016 23:18:02 -0000 On 08/27/16 04:01, Raphael Kubo da Costa wrote: > Raphael Kubo da Costa writes: >> You can either change the HINTING option when building the port or >> create a ~/.config/fontconfig/fonts.conf with something like this: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> hintnone >> >> >> > > "hintnone" was just an example and is likely the opposite of what you > want. In your specific case you probably need "hintmedium" or > "hintfull". > Indeed, I am wavering between hintmedium and hintfull. THANKS VERY MUCH :-) I am de-uglified. It was like the bad old days for a while. Regards, Russell