From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jan 1 00:15:59 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41764A7A11A for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 00:15:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20FA01F78 for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 00:15:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 1D636A7A119; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 00:15:59 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D058A7A118 for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 00:15:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.allbsd.org (gatekeeper.allbsd.org [IPv6:2001:2f0:104:e001::32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.allbsd.org", Issuer "RapidSSL SHA256 CA - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A096C1F77 for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 00:15:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail-d.allbsd.org (p2027-ipbf1605funabasi.chiba.ocn.ne.jp [123.225.191.27]) (authenticated bits=56) by mail.allbsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v010FXfi027630 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) (Client CN "/OU=GT07882699/OU=See+20www.rapidssl.com/resources/cps+20+28c+2915/OU=Domain+20Control+20Validated+20-+20RapidSSL+28R+29/CN=*.allbsd.org", Issuer "/C=US/O=GeoTrust+20Inc./CN=RapidSSL+20SHA256+20CA+20-+20G3"); Sun, 1 Jan 2017 09:15:53 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from alph.allbsd.org (alph.allbsd.org [192.168.0.10]) by mail-d.allbsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id v010EHgA019540 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 1 Jan 2017 09:14:17 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (authenticated bits=0) by alph.allbsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPA id v010EFHJ019537; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 09:14:17 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2017 09:14:08 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20170101.091408.94760884906738127.hrs@allbsd.org> To: starikarp@yandex.com Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libwraster From: Hiroki Sato In-Reply-To: <1483220783.1715.3.camel@yandex.com> References: <1483220783.1715.3.camel@yandex.com> X-PGPkey-fingerprint: BDB3 443F A5DD B3D0 A530 FFD7 4F2C D3D8 2793 CF2D X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 25.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="--Security_Multipart(Sun_Jan__1_09_14_08_2017_014)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at gatekeeper.allbsd.org X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender DNS name whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (mail.allbsd.org [133.31.130.32]); Sun, 01 Jan 2017 09:15:53 +0900 (JST) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.9 required=13.0 tests=CONTENT_TYPE_PRESENT, QENCPTR1,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on gatekeeper.allbsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2017 00:15:59 -0000 ----Security_Multipart(Sun_Jan__1_09_14_08_2017_014)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Stari Karp wrote in <1483220783.1715.3.camel@yandex.com>: st> Hi! st> st> I try to install WindowMaker with Synth on FreeBSD 11-RELEASE (amd64) st> and I have a problem with libwraster: (snip) I could not reproduce this. Can you please show all of options you chose? "-fopenmp" in your build log comes from libMagikCore because you are using some non-default options at least for graphics/ImageMagick. -- Hiroki ----Security_Multipart(Sun_Jan__1_09_14_08_2017_014)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlhoSdAACgkQTyzT2CeTzy2urwCfVEUj7IRzfsxqOchVqD287tJS mGMAoKf3mm/WburmpWPwH/Q2djh+zLvU =aqhb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Sun_Jan__1_09_14_08_2017_014)---- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jan 1 11:34:58 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB855C9A9CE for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 11:34:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@yandex.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C12EA1FAA for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 11:34:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@yandex.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id BD93CC9A9CD; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 11:34:58 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD347C9A9CC for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 11:34:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@yandex.com) Received: from forward3o.cmail.yandex.net (forward3o.cmail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1a72::288]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "forwards.mail.yandex.net", Issuer "Yandex CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 595991FA7 for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 11:34:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@yandex.com) Received: from smtp1p.mail.yandex.net (smtp1p.mail.yandex.net [77.88.29.84]) by forward3o.cmail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 67756206CA; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 14:34:55 +0300 (MSK) Received: from smtp1p.mail.yandex.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp1p.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id C519C17804D9; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 14:34:54 +0300 (MSK) Received: by smtp1p.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id 0oLMPstuHV-Yr8ed06a; Sun, 01 Jan 2017 14:34:53 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1483270494; bh=NZCyTG7ex3siYCSQDe78RuYKxJZGCyijfDiMusqXm+U=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=Q6UxqFM8scLgpM2q1BYAJvejLfbNa9uYPOxJV1H2qlrmQ/Lfl248A4kc07xlJ4gQr lWeTEEA5WK4zcMmj/P2PpaZnw2EmRAVtUSSuQ0a2luDhwUetqTJ5eHN4dH+Lv6l5SA ZCYhu54IOpY01oozLnJ4e7jgDN31nAuhmHT1xErk= Authentication-Results: smtp1p.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.com X-Yandex-Suid-Status: 1 0,1 0 Message-ID: <1483270491.3111.3.camel@yandex.com> Subject: Re: libwraster From: Stari Karp To: Kevin Oberman Cc: FreeBSD Ports Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2017 06:34:51 -0500 In-Reply-To: References: <1483220783.1715.3.camel@yandex.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2017 11:34:59 -0000 On Sat, 2016-12-31 at 15:19 -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Sat, Dec 31, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Stari Karp > wrote: > > Hi! > > > > I try to install WindowMaker with Synth on FreeBSD 11-RELEASE > > (amd64) > > and I have a problem with libwraster: > > > > ************* > > 1 warning generated. > > libtool: compile:  cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -I/usr/local/include > > -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include > > -DNDEBUG > > -D_XOPEN_SOURCE=700 -DFREEBSD -I/usr/local/include/ImageMagick-6 > > -fopenmp -DMAGICKCORE_HDRI_ENABLE=1 -DMAGICKCORE_QUANTUM_DEPTH=16 > > -O2 > > -pipe - > > fstack-protector -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wextra -Wno-sign- > > compare > > -Wno-deprecated -Wno-deprecated-declarations -MT load_magick.lo -MD > > -MP > > -MF .deps/load_magick.Tpo -c load_magick.c -o load_magick.o > > >/dev/null > > 2>&1 > > mv -f .deps/load_magick.Tpo .deps/load_magick.Plo > > --- libwraster.la --- > > /bin/sh ../libtool  --tag=CC    --mode=link cc > > -I/usr/local/include/ImageMagick-6 -fopenmp > > -DMAGICKCORE_HDRI_ENABLE=1 > > -DMAGICKCORE_QUANTUM_DEPTH=16 -O2 -pipe  -fstack-protector -fno- > > strict- > > aliasing -Wall -Wextra -Wno-sign-compare -Wno-deprecated -Wno- > > deprecated-declarations  -versi > > on-info 5:0:0  -Wl,--version-script=libwraster.map -L/usr/local/lib > > -fstack-protector -o libwraster.la -rpath /usr/local/lib raster.lo > > alpha_combine.lo draw.lo color.lo  load.lo save.lo gradient.lo > > xpixmap.lo convert.lo context.lo  misc.lo scale.lo rotate.lo > > flip.lo > > convolve.lo sav > > e_xpm.lo  xutil.lo load_ppm.lo load_gif.lo > > load_jpeg.lo  load_png.lo > > load_tiff.lo load_xpm.lo   load_webp.lo load_magick.lo > > -L/usr/local/lib > > -L/usr/local/lib  -L/usr/local/lib  -lXpm -lpng -ljpeg -lgif -ltiff > > -lwebp -L/usr/local/lib -lMagickWand-6 -lMagickCore-6   -lX11  - > > lXext > > -lX > > mu -lm -lkvm > > libtool: link: cc -shared  -fPIC -DPIC  .libs/raster.o > > .libs/alpha_combine.o .libs/draw.o .libs/color.o .libs/load.o > > .libs/save.o .libs/gradient.o .libs/xpixmap.o .libs/convert.o > > .libs/context.o .libs/misc.o .libs/scale.o .libs/rotate.o > > .libs/flip.o > > .libs/convolve.o .libs/save_xpm. > > o .libs/xutil.o .libs/load_ppm.o .libs/load_gif.o .libs/load_jpeg.o > > .libs/load_png.o .libs/load_tiff.o .libs/load_xpm.o > > .libs/load_webp.o > > .libs/load_magick.o   -Wl,-rpath -Wl,/usr/local/lib -Wl,-rpath > > -Wl,/usr/local/lib -L/usr/local/lib -lXpm -lpng -ljpeg -lgif -ltiff > > -lwebp /usr/l > > ocal/lib/libMagickWand-6.so /usr/local/lib/libMagickCore-6.so -lX11 > > -lXext -lXmu -lm -lkvm  -fopenmp -O2 -fstack-protector -Wl, > > --version- > > script=libwraster.map -fstack-protector   -fopenmp -pthread -Wl,- > > soname > > -Wl,libwraster.so.5 -o .libs/libwraster.so.5.0.0 > > /usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lomp > > cc: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see > > invocation) > > *** [libwraster.la] Error code 1 > > > > make[2]: stopped in /construction/xports/x11- > > wm/libwraster/work/WindowMaker-0.95.7/wrlib > > 1 error > > > > make[2]: stopped in /construction/xports/x11- > > wm/libwraster/work/WindowMaker-0.95.7/wrlib > > *** [all-recursive] Error code 1 > > > > make[1]: stopped in /construction/xports/x11- > > wm/libwraster/work/WindowMaker-0.95.7/wrlib > > 1 error > > > > make[1]: stopped in /construction/xports/x11- > > wm/libwraster/work/WindowMaker-0.95.7/wrlib > > ===> Compilation failed unexpectedly. > > Try to set MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=yes and rebuild before reporting the > > failure to > > the maintainer. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop. > > make: stopped in /xports/x11-wm/libwraster > > > > > > > > -------------------------------------------------- > > --  Termination > > -------------------------------------------------- > > > > Thank you. > libomp is a part of llvm. What, if any version of llvm is installed > by synth during the build? > > Also, what version of FreeBSD? > -- > Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer > E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com > PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 Thank you. I unchecked option "openmp" in ImageMagick and it build.  BTW, I like WindoMaker :). Happy and peaceful 2017! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jan 1 12:33:49 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFC7BC9A57D for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 12:33:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCC571DBE for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 12:33:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id CC2D7C9A57B; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 12:33:49 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBE0BC9A57A for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 12:33:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (portscout.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BF3DD1DBD for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 12:33:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v01CXnkO075866 for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 12:33:49 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v01CXn7f075862; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 12:33:49 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201701011233.v01CXn7f075862@portscout.ysv.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.ysv.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2017 12:33:49 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2017 12:33:50 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ lang/sbcl | 1.3.1 | 1.3.13 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ multimedia/dvdauthor | 0.7.1 | 0.7.2 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ www/impresscms | 1.3.7 | 1.3.10 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jan 1 12:34:19 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18B44C9A61F for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 12:34:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alert@vindazo.be) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05F9F1EBF for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 12:34:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alert@vindazo.be) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 05482C9A61E; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 12:34:19 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04DE7C9A61D for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 12:34:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alert@vindazo.be) Received: from vindazo.be (alert.vindazo.be [144.76.216.109]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 818521EBE for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 12:34:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alert@vindazo.be) Received: from Ubuntu-1310-saucy-64-minimal (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vindazo.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 828A4421908 for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 13:34:11 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=vindazo.be; s=mail; t=1483274051; bh=jW0SEaagljmLUfIooUwREWvzrm6rGtnxw9uDhd+7r+4=; h=Subject:From:To:Date:From; b=CaXE+JFnKWFRrSdxPj6yKtiD5XXsBDyUxXU7aASR6PAFSgl0gpBqhdaShMrsFze4+ sP4n54EE/7qMZoiaFRKrH4Xp09YbgRSX1kRaug4+MoOfq7u8ZKKBEel9NGlhywbxke /ImJypFrxLb6LIW4nZdzr42pSpI/IkuEJhcrdX7k= Subject: Nieuwe vacatures voor verkoper 2017-01-01 From: alert@vindazo.be To: ports@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2017 12:34:11 -0000 Message-ID: <20170101123411.693.1057@Ubuntu-1310-saucy-64-minimal> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2017 12:34:19 -0000 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jan 1 15:35:44 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF98FC97103 for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 15:35:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from msa1.earth.yoonka.com (yoonka.com [185.24.122.233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "msa1.earth.yoonka.com", Issuer "msa1.earth.yoonka.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F03E17F6 for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 15:35:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from crayon2.yoonka.com (crayon2.yoonka.com [10.70.7.20]) (authenticated bits=0) by msa1.earth.yoonka.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v01FSKsg000364 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 15:28:21 GMT (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Grzegorz Junka Subject: Wine & PlayOnBSD Message-ID: <88ccc43a-d28e-588b-9d3f-01fb3a1c85b9@gjunka.com> Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2017 15:28:20 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2017 15:35:45 -0000 I am using FreeBSD 10.3 x64. I understand that to run Windows applications on that configuration I can use only one of the following: 1. playonbsd-4.2.10_1 2. wine-staging-2.0.r3_1,1 3. i386-wine-staging-2.0.r3_1,1 4. wine-devel-2.0.r3_1,1 5. i386-wine-devel-2.0.r3_1,1 6. wine-1.8.6,1 7. i386-wine-1.8.6,1 Currently I have installed playonbsd, which is good but it seems that not all applications I would like to install can be installed on it. Which one of those options would give me the most compatibility with office-type and multimedia applications (e.g. DVD player, SoftPhone, applications that access USB), not necessarily games? Should I prefer some of these ports over others for my x64 system? When switching from one port to another (e.g. wine to playonbsd) can I keep the currently installed Windows applications or I would need to reinstall any of the applications/libraries installed on the previous version? It seems that front-end ports (q4wine, swine) default to 4. from the list (wine-devel-2.0.r3_1,1). Is there any reason for that? Can they run without problems on a x64 system? Many thanks for any insights. Greg From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jan 1 17:33:30 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A415C9A089 for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 17:33:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abi@abinet.ru) Received: from mail.abinet.ru (mail.abinet.ru [136.243.72.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE1E01BE7 for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 17:33:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abi@abinet.ru) Received: from [10.0.1.1] (unknown [10.0.1.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.abinet.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 13E7734883 for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 17:27:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=abinet.ru; s=dkim; t=1483291622; bh=6SVI4nyyAGZihf9hnsPQJzgc60RcvSEEhyHkvxdgkbg=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=SJlIog5k8VEME2zcWBOE3FPLDhN/2iquj/7J4Qzdo0EM+9cHpdtxcX/zqIdR8qlYD npchikV6si0HRl5jff9EgCeaYElqWLaSsrcLjCy1j6VqPd9PkQ/ceiYGCyCMtZ9wr/ PuHL3WSeXd7+VtvU4WZu3spqRSKQ/yUD95msY3eE= Message-ID: <58693C2B.7040806@abinet.ru> Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2017 20:28:11 +0300 From: abi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:25.8) Gecko/20151117 FossaMail/25.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wine & PlayOnBSD References: <88ccc43a-d28e-588b-9d3f-01fb3a1c85b9@gjunka.com> In-Reply-To: <88ccc43a-d28e-588b-9d3f-01fb3a1c85b9@gjunka.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2017 17:33:30 -0000 On 01.01.2017 18:28, Grzegorz Junka wrote: > I am using FreeBSD 10.3 x64. I understand that to run Windows > applications on that configuration I can use only one of the following: > > 1. playonbsd-4.2.10_1 > 2. wine-staging-2.0.r3_1,1 > 3. i386-wine-staging-2.0.r3_1,1 > 4. wine-devel-2.0.r3_1,1 > 5. i386-wine-devel-2.0.r3_1,1 > 6. wine-1.8.6,1 > 7. i386-wine-1.8.6,1 > > Currently I have installed playonbsd, which is good but it seems that > not all applications I would like to install can be installed on it. > > Which one of those options would give me the most compatibility with > office-type and multimedia applications (e.g. DVD player, SoftPhone, > applications that access USB), not necessarily games? > > Should I prefer some of these ports over others for my x64 system? > > When switching from one port to another (e.g. wine to playonbsd) can I > keep the currently installed Windows applications or I would need to > reinstall any of the applications/libraries installed on the previous > version? > > It seems that front-end ports (q4wine, swine) default to 4. from the > list (wine-devel-2.0.r3_1,1). Is there any reason for that? Can they > run without problems on a x64 system? > > Many thanks for any insights. Probably you need i386-wine-devel and emulators/winetricks playonbsd is a wrapper for wine. No need to use it at all, just get installer for you program, create new wineprefix and install software into it Personally, I make 1 wineprefix for 1 program (or program group ) with env WINEPREFIX=$HOME/.local/share/wineprefixes/ck2 wineboot sandbox it with winetricks if needed copy installer into $HOME/.local/share/wineprefixes/ck2/drive_c/Distr env WINEPREFIX=$HOME/.local/share/wineprefixes/ck2 wine cmd navigate to Distr and run installer ck2 is example prefix for crusader kings II. I love Paradox games :P From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jan 1 18:31:23 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84B72C9AC65 for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 18:31:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62B66112F for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 18:31:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 589DCC9AC64; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 18:31:23 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 583B9C9AC63 for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 18:31:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.allbsd.org (gatekeeper.allbsd.org [IPv6:2001:2f0:104:e001::32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.allbsd.org", Issuer "RapidSSL SHA256 CA - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D81AC112D for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 18:31:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail-d.allbsd.org (p2027-ipbf1605funabasi.chiba.ocn.ne.jp [123.225.191.27]) (authenticated bits=56) by mail.allbsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v01IUvbi024082 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) (Client CN "/OU=GT07882699/OU=See+20www.rapidssl.com/resources/cps+20+28c+2915/OU=Domain+20Control+20Validated+20-+20RapidSSL+28R+29/CN=*.allbsd.org", Issuer "/C=US/O=GeoTrust+20Inc./CN=RapidSSL+20SHA256+20CA+20-+20G3"); Mon, 2 Jan 2017 03:31:17 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from alph.allbsd.org (alph.allbsd.org [192.168.0.10]) by mail-d.allbsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id v01ITgJb027331 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 2 Jan 2017 03:29:42 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (authenticated bits=0) by alph.allbsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPA id v01ITeQv027328; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 03:29:42 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2017 03:29:31 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20170102.032931.2199837842430250667.hrs@allbsd.org> To: starikarp@yandex.com Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libwraster From: Hiroki Sato In-Reply-To: <1483270342.3111.1.camel@yandex.com> <1483270491.3111.3.camel@yandex.com> References: <1483220783.1715.3.camel@yandex.com> <20170101.091408.94760884906738127.hrs@allbsd.org> <1483270342.3111.1.camel@yandex.com> X-PGPkey-fingerprint: BDB3 443F A5DD B3D0 A530 FFD7 4F2C D3D8 2793 CF2D X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 25.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="--Security_Multipart(Mon_Jan__2_03_29_31_2017_450)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at gatekeeper.allbsd.org X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender DNS name whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (mail.allbsd.org [133.31.130.32]); Mon, 02 Jan 2017 03:31:18 +0900 (JST) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.5 required=13.0 tests=CONTENT_TYPE_PRESENT, MIMEQENC,QENCPTR1,QENCPTR2,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on gatekeeper.allbsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2017 18:31:23 -0000 ----Security_Multipart(Mon_Jan__2_03_29_31_2017_450)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Stari Karp wrote in <1483270342.3111.1.camel@yandex.com>: st> On Sun, 2017-01-01 at 09:14 +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: st> > Stari Karp wrote st> > =A0 in <1483220783.1715.3.camel@yandex.com>: st> > = st> > st> Hi! st> > st> st> > st> I try to install WindowMaker with Synth on FreeBSD 11-RELEASE= st> > (amd64) st> > st> and I have a problem with libwraster: st> > = st> > (snip) st> > = st> > =A0I could not reproduce this.=A0 Can you please show all of opti= ons you st> > =A0chose?=A0 "-fopenmp" in your build log comes from libMagikCore= because st> > =A0you are using some non-default options at least for st> > =A0graphics/ImageMagick. st> > = st> > -- Hiroki st> = st> Thank you very much for the help. I did uncheck openmp option in st> ImageMagick and it works :). I did not able to reproduce it even if ImageMagick was built with the OpenMP option. I guess your environment has another issue which pulls -lomp into the build process. -- Hiroki ----Security_Multipart(Mon_Jan__2_03_29_31_2017_450)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlhpSosACgkQTyzT2CeTzy3nJgCffXJcw5/z3U7IP7MNBbd6GPl6 URQAoM2o7oSPIZLO/8BlyLLtArZB+Xxd =kmWg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Mon_Jan__2_03_29_31_2017_450)---- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jan 1 19:51:28 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5928DC9A1B9 for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 19:51:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AADF18FE for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 19:51:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 474DEC9A1B8; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 19:51:28 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 451A8C9A1B6 for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 19:51:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2462A18FD; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 19:51:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1354) id 6C0CB3FBF; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 19:51:27 +0000 (UTC) To: hrs@FreeBSD.org, starikarp@yandex.com Subject: Re: libwraster Cc: ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20170102.032931.2199837842430250667.hrs@allbsd.org> Message-Id: <20170101195127.6C0CB3FBF@freefall.freebsd.org> Date: Sun, 1 Jan 2017 19:51:27 +0000 (UTC) From: jbeich@freebsd.org (Jan Beich) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2017 19:51:28 -0000 Hiroki Sato writes: > I did not able to reproduce it even if ImageMagick was built with the > OpenMP option. I guess your environment has another issue which > pulls -lomp into the build process. Clang >= 3.7 no longer ignores -fopenmp which now requires libomp.so from devel/openmp (for base compiler) or devel/llvm* built with OPENMP=on. For example: 1. Use FreeBSD >= 11.0 2. Install graphics/ImageMagick with OPENMP=on 3. Deinstall devel/openmp (just in case) 4. Build the port with default compiler The obvious fix is teach ImageMagick to not pollute namespace as nothing in its public API uses #pragma omp or omp_ symbols. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Jan 1 20:38:14 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA53C9AF26 for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 20:38:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@yandex.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D42351C0C for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 20:38:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@yandex.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D070AC9AF25; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 20:38:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D015AC9AF21 for ; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 20:38:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@yandex.com) Received: from forward5h.cmail.yandex.net (forward5h.cmail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:f35::15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "forwards.mail.yandex.net", Issuer "Yandex CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C2761C0B; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 20:38:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from starikarp@yandex.com) Received: from smtp3p.mail.yandex.net (smtp3p.mail.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:0:1472:2741:0:8b6:8]) by forward5h.cmail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 9349A20ED8; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 23:38:01 +0300 (MSK) Received: from smtp3p.mail.yandex.net (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3p.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 703B81320086; Sun, 1 Jan 2017 23:37:59 +0300 (MSK) Received: by smtp3p.mail.yandex.net (nwsmtp/Yandex) with ESMTPSA id k8PkW2dZ1S-bwXuipRU; Sun, 01 Jan 2017 23:37:59 +0300 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client certificate not present) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex.com; s=mail; t=1483303079; bh=K0lO5TFxDFZZwbH1IR1XAtt608dvO2OC7g9JdMwsdqk=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References; b=M/i6IfqpEky4lmOALkSTk/0l4zUgi/p3japEAtyjuL6IIShgDA8u5Z3u7I0aPmVGZ GoQFFn0SgihdNjyD3OXwz3PXYJ2prQXh/BVudoAGfrZw/cUChlyxlA7XSv3b7wgajS HH3+ncJVYG+aQgOuoLjiyz5lD2RJ2IN1b0GtZla0= Authentication-Results: smtp3p.mail.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex.com X-Yandex-Suid-Status: 1 0,1 0,1 0 Message-ID: <1483303076.12233.2.camel@yandex.com> Subject: Re: libwraster From: Stari Karp To: Jan Beich , hrs@FreeBSD.org Cc: ports@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2017 15:37:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20170101195127.6C0CB3FBF@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <20170101195127.6C0CB3FBF@freefall.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.18.5.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Jan 2017 20:38:15 -0000 On Sun, 2017-01-01 at 19:51 +0000, Jan Beich wrote: > Hiroki Sato writes: > > > > >  I did not able to reproduce it even if ImageMagick was built with > > the > >  OpenMP option.  I guess your environment has another issue which > >  pulls -lomp into the build process. > Clang >= 3.7 no longer ignores -fopenmp which now requires libomp.so > from devel/openmp (for base compiler) or devel/llvm* built with > OPENMP=on. > > For example: >   1. Use FreeBSD >= 11.0 >   2. Install graphics/ImageMagick with OPENMP=on >   3. Deinstall devel/openmp (just in case) >   4. Build the port with default compiler > > The obvious fix is teach ImageMagick to not pollute namespace as > nothing > in its public API uses #pragma omp or omp_ symbols. I did as you wrote above I have the same error which I posted first time. And default clang is: clang -v FreeBSD clang version 3.8.0 (tags/RELEASE_380/final 262564) (based on LLVM 3.8.0) Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd11.0 Thread model: posix InstalledDir: /usr/bin From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Jan 2 10:08:47 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06B68C9B1E9 for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 10:08:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from avasout07.plus.net (avasout07.plus.net [84.93.230.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Bizanga Labs SMTP Client Certificate", Issuer "Bizanga Labs CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B35E13CD for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 10:08:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from curlew.milibyte.co.uk ([80.229.31.82]) by avasout07 with smtp id TN5Y1u0071mJoLY01N5ZCB; Mon, 02 Jan 2017 10:05:33 +0000 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=EJB26xRC c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=cd0K7rcWwnZFf6xQxRobyA==:117 a=cd0K7rcWwnZFf6xQxRobyA==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=IgFoBzBjUZAA:10 a=cTpSpK87Lc28AONtzR4A:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=svxhw6sTWp0A:10 Received: from curlew.lan ([192.168.1.13]) by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cNzUW-000O5s-2X for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2017 10:05:32 +0000 Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 10:05:19 +0000 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20170102100519.7aca5957@curlew.lan> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.1 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.1.13 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on curlew.lan X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Subject: What's happened to flashplugin? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2017 10:08:47 -0000 Both www/linux-c7-flashplugin24 and www/linux-c6-flashplugin24 appear to have been deleted from ports but I can't find information relating to why they've gone. Is this deletion permanent or can we expect a flash plugin to reappear? -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Jan 2 10:16:53 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A85A7C9B940 for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 10:16:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from tensor.andric.com (tensor.andric.com [87.251.56.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "tensor.andric.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 716BB15D5 for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 10:16:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from coleburn.avinity.tv (unknown [77.95.97.98]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1E40C36777; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 11:16:45 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_A7E14505-A702-42BF-BF40-CEB34B43FFFF"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: What's happened to flashplugin? From: Dimitry Andric In-Reply-To: <20170102100519.7aca5957@curlew.lan> Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 11:16:38 +0100 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-Id: <97C7144D-93CB-4ECD-B921-1F56916C6FC9@FreeBSD.org> References: <20170102100519.7aca5957@curlew.lan> To: Mike Clarke X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2017 10:16:53 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_A7E14505-A702-42BF-BF40-CEB34B43FFFF Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On 02 Jan 2017, at 11:05, Mike Clarke = wrote: >=20 > Both www/linux-c7-flashplugin24 and www/linux-c6-flashplugin24 appear > to have been deleted from ports but I can't find information relating > to why they've gone. $ grep flashplugin /usr/ports/MOVED www/linux-f8-flashplugin10||2011-04-04|Has expired: End of Life since = Jan 7, 2009 www/flashplugin-mozilla||2011-09-30|gplflash is no longer supported, = please use graphics/gnash www/asterisk-fop||2011-09-30|Depends on www/flashplugin-mozilla which is = DEPRECATED www/linux-flashplugin7||2011-10-14|Vulnerable since at least 2008-05-30 www/linux-f10-flashplugin10|www/linux-f10-flashplugin11|2012-08-26|Has = expired: has vulnerabilities and is EOL www/linux-flashplugin9||2013-04-16|Has expired: Vulnerable, Broken for = more than 6 months www/linux-f10-flashplugin11|www/linux-flashplayer|2016-12-13|Removed = upstream www/linux-c6-flashplugin11|www/linux-flashplayer|2016-12-13|Removed = upstream www/linux-c7-flashplugin11|www/linux-flashplayer|2016-12-13|Removed = upstream www/linux-c6-flashplugin24|www/linux-flashplayer|2016-12-18|Renamed to = match upstream www/linux-c7-flashplugin24|www/linux-flashplayer|2016-12-18|Renamed to = match upstream > Is this deletion permanent or can we expect a flash plugin to = reappear? It's been renamed to www/linux-flashplayer. -Dimitry --Apple-Mail=_A7E14505-A702-42BF-BF40-CEB34B43FFFF Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.30 iEYEARECAAYFAlhqKI0ACgkQsF6jCi4glqPFVgCdHHdkvnD5Ee/KLq8YYxnYeApw rDYAoJM9SGHMJceQHrfzVkb/Tc/31/3P =gwPy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_A7E14505-A702-42BF-BF40-CEB34B43FFFF-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Jan 2 11:26:47 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A848C9BB6E for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 11:26:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from avasout07.plus.net (avasout07.plus.net [84.93.230.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Bizanga Labs SMTP Client Certificate", Issuer "Bizanga Labs CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1A6B14C6 for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 11:26:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from curlew.milibyte.co.uk ([80.229.31.82]) by avasout07 with smtp id TPSi1u0021mJoLY01PSj9m; Mon, 02 Jan 2017 11:26:43 +0000 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=EJB26xRC c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=cd0K7rcWwnZFf6xQxRobyA==:117 a=cd0K7rcWwnZFf6xQxRobyA==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=IgFoBzBjUZAA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=cjG6an0Wiri7CIYVmQkA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=xTEKusZW6nYA:10 a=BDqyQ8pepzAA:10 a=IjZwj45LgO3ly-622nXo:22 Received: from curlew.lan ([192.168.1.13]) by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.87) (envelope-from ) id 1cO0lG-000OxU-ID for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 02 Jan 2017 11:26:42 +0000 Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 11:26:42 +0000 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20170102112642.548752ff@curlew.lan> In-Reply-To: <97C7144D-93CB-4ECD-B921-1F56916C6FC9@FreeBSD.org> References: <20170102100519.7aca5957@curlew.lan> <97C7144D-93CB-4ECD-B921-1F56916C6FC9@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.1 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.1.13 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on curlew.lan X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Subject: Re: What's happened to flashplugin? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2017 11:26:47 -0000 On Mon, 2 Jan 2017 11:16:38 +0100 Dimitry Andric wrote: > It's been renamed to www/linux-flashplayer. Thanks. It's working fine now after installing the new renamed version. -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Jan 2 12:57:02 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD7A3C9B104 for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 12:57:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA11B13C2 for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 12:57:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 9FD19C9B103; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 12:57:02 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F18CC9B102 for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 12:57:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (portscout.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9230A13C1 for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 12:57:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v02Cv2ft009720 for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 12:57:02 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v02Cv2an009719; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 12:57:02 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201701021257.v02Cv2an009719@portscout.ysv.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.ysv.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 12:57:02 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2017 12:57:02 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ games/robocode | 1.9.2.5 | 1.9.2.6 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ textproc/supercat | 0.5.5 | 0.5.6 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Jan 2 14:40:01 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9CE5C9C9F8; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 14:40:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m@absolight.fr) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (prod2.absolight.net [79.143.243.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CCF31E26; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 14:40:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m@absolight.fr) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87F27BDD6A; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 15:39:59 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at absolight.net X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -2.599 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-200 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no Received: from prod2.absolight.net ([127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (prod2.absolight.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 20024) with ESMTP id QaF6dcMbc1_V; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 15:39:58 +0100 (CET) Received: by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9F19DBDD40; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 15:39:58 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 15:39:58 +0100 From: Mathieu Arnold To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-ports-announce@freebsd.org Subject: New 2017Q1 branch Message-ID: <20170102143951.GA37801@prod2.absolight.net> Reply-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2017 14:40:01 -0000 --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, The 2017Q1 branch has been created. It means that the next update on the quarterly packages will be on the 2017Q1 branch. A lot of things happened in the last three months: - pkg 1.9.4 - New USES: lxqt, varnish - Default version of GCC switched to 4.8 to 4.9 - Default version of Perl switched to 5.20 to 5.24 - Default version of Python 3 switched to 3.4 to 3.5 - New default version, Varnish at 4 - Firefox 50.1.0 - Firefox-esr 45.6.0 - Chromium 54.0.2840.100 - Ruby 2.1.0, 2.2.6 and 2.3.3 - gcc 4.9.4 - Gnome 3.18.0 - KDE 4.14.3 - Xorg 7.7 Next quarterly package builds will start in the next couple of days and should be available on your closest mirrors few days later. For those stat nerds out there, here's what happened during the last 3 mont= hs on head: Number of commits: 6871 Number of committers: 161 Most active committers: 1049 sunpoet 538 amdmi3 404 jbeich 305 swills 200 antoine 180 wen 180 mat 166 marino 159 pi 158 linimon Diffstat: 18409 files changed, 419461 insertions(+), 234188 deletions(-) and on the 2016Q4 branch: Number of commits: 290 Number of committers: 51 Most active committers: 67 jbeich 31 feld 12 junovitch 11 antoine 10 tijl 9 tz 9 riggs 8 koobs 8 ehaupt 8 cpm Diffstat: 1090 files changed, 56829 insertions(+), 16225 deletions(-) Regards, --=20 Mathieu Arnold --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAABCgBmBQJYamY1XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQzQUI2OTc4OUQyRUQxMjEwNjQ0MEJBNUIz QTQ1MTZGMzUxODNDRTQ4AAoJEDpFFvNRg85IhQQP/RM2o7FGIuQZZlEzmful2Jy3 JVgM1sllM8X2ornDJvQqv5MNtqRbk4M8GcjHrbEZSbkrxl0FYamg9AL2Zm4e/ILM JVyt+ey22mInEOhav8tVW44huISeBrxdSMcm7E4NS7TNzC8ZxqypXLSSPrX4SY6U tkKlSJvogjiHb4vNzMiePF9TOzqGx0lCQuODbdbh4znV+5xJC0v7WftUynaH+B6L u/tmC/jG5Qn97OBNWGl5O86YkoK6t5Sidet3XO0awyMGcnCv2Mu6mOiMCXTVMm1l q7Ka3lcSsH1zYcf0AXGXPjojm2tvTXdA+WoANvjate1k3uA3j6UC0L6MiL/HYEs/ o4HiQHHw2zL0Zp+gwKmDSy0CEcGhzpb/G6/ZR9B2enR6dG2HXIj/06GyaNjAqtpd dgu2Su7kEHEaetXXUFLb3OyBuvvWlEIHZlLI66j0cDYpF+x9MCfalU7bwhGtPRx1 GebFYfyKkkQg22C1Et5G6noiZ2iZ1FLc3f/hpp+ZV4iXNmmIbIZwiiPIavq5uORg 4wFymTeuaBhFjOSrlLcK/dL0ntBRmTKM1M6AW9i/wNSCVJPzH0jXNC+RoowMh4UD 0aHxr6iPgGg1ir78R+RlykUKutg8PZGyeq6b+k4RbJF3MwBOHI0yYDRpXYUlSeWj NuhZP73LNVh07Mfu2OuF =vLzw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Jan 2 18:23:17 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48C63C9C390 for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 18:23:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24FEC1A45 for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 18:23:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 215FDC9C38F; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 18:23:17 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20EF8C9C38E for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 18:23:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.allbsd.org (gatekeeper.allbsd.org [IPv6:2001:2f0:104:e001::32]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.allbsd.org", Issuer "RapidSSL SHA256 CA - G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 868591A44; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 18:23:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail-d.allbsd.org (p2027-ipbf1605funabasi.chiba.ocn.ne.jp [123.225.191.27]) (authenticated bits=56) by mail.allbsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v02IMpE0076885 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) (Client CN "/OU=GT07882699/OU=See+20www.rapidssl.com/resources/cps+20+28c+2915/OU=Domain+20Control+20Validated+20-+20RapidSSL+28R+29/CN=*.allbsd.org", Issuer "/C=US/O=GeoTrust+20Inc./CN=RapidSSL+20SHA256+20CA+20-+20G3"); Tue, 3 Jan 2017 03:23:11 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from alph.allbsd.org (alph.allbsd.org [192.168.0.10]) by mail-d.allbsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id v02ILZrc029456 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 3 Jan 2017 03:21:35 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) (authenticated bits=0) by alph.allbsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPA id v02ILYrS029452; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 03:21:35 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 03:21:26 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20170103.032126.1717605790407508097.hrs@allbsd.org> To: jbeich@freebsd.org Cc: starikarp@yandex.com, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libwraster From: Hiroki Sato In-Reply-To: <20170101195127.6C0CB3FBF@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <20170102.032931.2199837842430250667.hrs@allbsd.org> <20170101195127.6C0CB3FBF@freefall.freebsd.org> X-PGPkey-fingerprint: BDB3 443F A5DD B3D0 A530 FFD7 4F2C D3D8 2793 CF2D X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 25.1 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="--Security_Multipart0(Tue_Jan__3_03_21_26_2017_988)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99 at gatekeeper.allbsd.org X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender DNS name whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (mail.allbsd.org [133.31.130.32]); Tue, 03 Jan 2017 03:23:12 +0900 (JST) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.9 required=13.0 tests=CONTENT_TYPE_PRESENT, QENCPTR1,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on gatekeeper.allbsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2017 18:23:17 -0000 ----Security_Multipart0(Tue_Jan__3_03_21_26_2017_988)-- Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; boundary="--Next_Part(Tue_Jan__3_03_21_26_2017_167)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit ----Next_Part(Tue_Jan__3_03_21_26_2017_167)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit jbeich@freebsd.org (Jan Beich) wrote in <20170101195127.6C0CB3FBF@freefall.freebsd.org>: jb> Hiroki Sato writes: jb> jb> > I did not able to reproduce it even if ImageMagick was built with the jb> > OpenMP option. I guess your environment has another issue which jb> > pulls -lomp into the build process. jb> jb> Clang >= 3.7 no longer ignores -fopenmp which now requires libomp.so jb> from devel/openmp (for base compiler) or devel/llvm* built with OPENMP=on. jb> jb> For example: jb> 1. Use FreeBSD >= 11.0 jb> 2. Install graphics/ImageMagick with OPENMP=on jb> 3. Deinstall devel/openmp (just in case) jb> 4. Build the port with default compiler jb> jb> The obvious fix is teach ImageMagick to not pollute namespace as nothing jb> in its public API uses #pragma omp or omp_ symbols. So is the attached patch safe to avoid this? -- Hiroki ----Next_Part(Tue_Jan__3_03_21_26_2017_167)-- Content-Type: Text/X-Patch; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="ImageMagick.20170103-1.diff" Index: graphics/ImageMagick/files/patch-configure =================================================================== --- graphics/ImageMagick/files/patch-configure (nonexistent) +++ graphics/ImageMagick/files/patch-configure (working copy) @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +--- configure.orig 2017-01-03 02:07:28.432298000 +0900 ++++ configure 2017-01-03 02:09:38.248392000 +0900 +@@ -11691,7 +11691,6 @@ + + + CFLAGS="$OPENMP_CFLAGS $CFLAGS" +-MAGICK_PCFLAGS="$MAGICK_PCFLAGS $OPENMP_CFLAGS" + + if test "$enable_openmp" != no; then + if test "$ac_cv_prog_c_openmp" != 'unsupported'; then Property changes on: graphics/ImageMagick/files/patch-configure ___________________________________________________________________ Added: fbsd:nokeywords ## -0,0 +1 ## +yes \ No newline at end of property Added: svn:eol-style ## -0,0 +1 ## +native \ No newline at end of property Added: svn:mime-type ## -0,0 +1 ## +text/plain \ No newline at end of property ----Next_Part(Tue_Jan__3_03_21_26_2017_167)---- ----Security_Multipart0(Tue_Jan__3_03_21_26_2017_988)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEABECAAYFAlhqmiYACgkQTyzT2CeTzy3/UQCgkTRnZuIt/Do1PJkE1b7O4W5V WCsAnRuIjrQZpOHUIwuIDEjlncuMcmoz =CIwR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart0(Tue_Jan__3_03_21_26_2017_988)---- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jan 3 00:02:19 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34BA4C9C583 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 00:02:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "vps1.elischer.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 145CA1BE3 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 00:02:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from Julian-MBP3.local (ppp121-45-237-203.lns20.per1.internode.on.net [121.45.237.203]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v0302DhJ052270 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 2 Jan 2017 16:02:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Subject: Re: New 2017Q1 branch To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20170102143951.GA37801@prod2.absolight.net> From: Julian Elischer Message-ID: <1a14ae7e-f90a-26fd-0dd3-2ffe309241db@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 08:02:07 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170102143951.GA37801@prod2.absolight.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:02:19 -0000 On 2/01/2017 10:39 PM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: can we ask the server admins to not delete the 1016Q4 pkg collection immediately? it is stable and works while 2017Q1 is not yet in that state. > Hi, > > The 2017Q1 branch has been created. It means that the next update on the > quarterly packages will be on the 2017Q1 branch. > > A lot of things happened in the last three months: > - pkg 1.9.4 > - New USES: lxqt, varnish > - Default version of GCC switched to 4.8 to 4.9 > - Default version of Perl switched to 5.20 to 5.24 > - Default version of Python 3 switched to 3.4 to 3.5 > - New default version, Varnish at 4 > - Firefox 50.1.0 > - Firefox-esr 45.6.0 > - Chromium 54.0.2840.100 > - Ruby 2.1.0, 2.2.6 and 2.3.3 > - gcc 4.9.4 > - Gnome 3.18.0 > - KDE 4.14.3 > - Xorg 7.7 > > Next quarterly package builds will start in the next couple of days and > should be available on your closest mirrors few days later. > > For those stat nerds out there, here's what happened during the last 3 months on head: > Number of commits: 6871 > Number of committers: 161 > Most active committers: > 1049 sunpoet > 538 amdmi3 > 404 jbeich > 305 swills > 200 antoine > 180 wen > 180 mat > 166 marino > 159 pi > 158 linimon > Diffstat: 18409 files changed, 419461 insertions(+), 234188 deletions(-) > > and on the 2016Q4 branch: > Number of commits: 290 > Number of committers: 51 > Most active committers: > 67 jbeich > 31 feld > 12 junovitch > 11 antoine > 10 tijl > 9 tz > 9 riggs > 8 koobs > 8 ehaupt > 8 cpm > Diffstat: 1090 files changed, 56829 insertions(+), 16225 deletions(-) > > Regards, > From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jan 3 00:04:08 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E58B8C9C64D for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 00:04:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wj0-x235.google.com (mail-wj0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c01::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80CD11CEC; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 00:04:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wj0-x235.google.com with SMTP id tq7so196728069wjb.0; Mon, 02 Jan 2017 16:04:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=RN+aw6eXcMTvHrg9U7K8f0sgSbA42M2RTcz7Nmvbu9U=; b=G2wrLZeybal3VIK5iey3MzYMYy12Ul41D4e65swu9Oitv4aP9QolHtzF98yAAA9Cdj 8sZakelZ/1ce4Q8btRjwI+BSGS0HcUGCwYiRIiHs2P6RGMsnmwjE/2RT+C19S2hlS+yN 5Zegff6cFzCCkxTcUs2XTv4Ti/IYOc0D2m8Yb6W6l/GyHOsH6Ow1SjD++nO0dqpLaUQ5 ru2hYEJ+J/TdNb+mN0bOvfzET2LnKf/IPTdpwR6wglxCTbQ/veL0uIZFtQZ968R9LCEL G/rg259IeYZCaADOqrnju4GliGqRiZbrdB6kh0sFVOOAWdjqJ1X2Wz2sFP5gPQDfhU2G RaOw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=RN+aw6eXcMTvHrg9U7K8f0sgSbA42M2RTcz7Nmvbu9U=; b=An4rwp5ELW1aMXhRxlOdQvLFIDIumvUBgWE3HF9enA1zSaOWKqKSxJTnpENmqsj8Ai DZe197uuXX7RamjVF7yeLUAH4cgUAORQzg4KQWqvLHlrX5GhWF+wYoHRfgmNF7XXpc5F ql1IXS6onNOkwGM9GHmTS1RBe3TaIdcwQV9dk63V97sInxy1CeM90NlAbMkHLGjbaNyc IsNelCqqvFVAinirygm2Xf4cF8Y3NQAIudE/W/5kPQaX6Ci/H7aTdUy4JLH5PWN0u45P 2TjLUU/CCaM6lO3n9OCo3mojM2zJXNrF3NEoOH249jBc7TWWQvUACN/ydoJluXHX7Leb pfHw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKL4MvjQy/3fx9+D5SaoiEWT8TwROPgradCDffYMMcrD0OWnNaUd74f6B/79x0Qtg== X-Received: by 10.194.120.226 with SMTP id lf2mr50955640wjb.130.1483401846911; Mon, 02 Jan 2017 16:04:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d64sm86556082wmh.3.2017.01.02.16.04.06 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 02 Jan 2017 16:04:06 -0800 (PST) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 01:04:05 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Julian Elischer Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New 2017Q1 branch Message-ID: <20170103000405.vgj5dghvkpum5ssa@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20170102143951.GA37801@prod2.absolight.net> <1a14ae7e-f90a-26fd-0dd3-2ffe309241db@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zumtdhn6d3ttughn" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1a14ae7e-f90a-26fd-0dd3-2ffe309241db@freebsd.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20161126 (1.7.1) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 00:04:09 -0000 --zumtdhn6d3ttughn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 08:02:07AM +0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > On 2/01/2017 10:39 PM, Mathieu Arnold wrote: >=20 > can we ask the server admins to not delete the 1016Q4 pkg collection > immediately? > it is stable and works while 2017Q1 is not yet in that state. >=20 server admins is clusteradm, so just ask them :) Best regards, Bapt --zumtdhn6d3ttughn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEgOTj3suS2urGXVU3Y4mL3PG3PloFAlhq6nAACgkQY4mL3PG3 PlrJ4BAApln3lDTELublUCjE8Ifs9kTsnjBw8yTzFBR4uaRpHezMrEgV5nrebFtI cSss0e9EQYzrZ1h75SfL3uNbHDSy52ZI+1HVO0OlF4ElECdoARoYhgcJdYkRqvgB gcMXlWBO4F/owJfPoeVe7uGj7wQaCwbwk5rFIg3hPEv3U9xSBPz2vSnA1SxduEfo TMuVEnCJ+RoAo3XAahVb9xMRBgGXXokARTk0GEzEtNrDJYksuhJQzMj+XHOOc00u GMr01Z/a4m8/T/SOEvxHXByGqIct6gYfimTIf3XMiRAvkYeHL5I3JQ9hCtqOUYxg XlzOBJpAeDtc2t34C83uNhnSCFse38v0NHarl14giu/hLNkIgUrVn/8wMMCJyOhz 4IPispgVJAhMSCVDLYiDbwWoq0rpf1MKox7xQPUqcSHHI0Ash6myYICJbM5IdYWn M/6MTS6q0dl40Vw3lq+2tDtAbUOiNbl5+0cujwdgdW7E/5T2HbDX3j71E1nYL7uy KrtAuUbKIdmYrOOcxPvSQvXu6Mr/evslUih+ijcGDQYpBi1Eoq8n6Estmma02b0n K/TMnjHIiAVMF6BbnQ1Sdvi2TKkTyFABp7JIpbIhqKshY7RtmEChwvbNUqb9fB4n d0NooEllXcbmYyjbh7vBZApOHVmlkYHsLIaP9+36Z9U5HVg/rTc= =Er26 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zumtdhn6d3ttughn-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jan 3 06:22:34 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 749FDC9B2C2 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 06:22:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 606F81AE0 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 06:22:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 5CF41C9B2C0; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 06:22:34 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C9AEC9B2BF for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 06:22:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "vps1.elischer.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B4C11ADD for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 06:22:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from Julian-MBP3.local (ppp121-45-237-203.lns20.per1.internode.on.net [121.45.237.203]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v036MSt2053489 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 2 Jan 2017 22:22:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: samba43-4.3.11_1 and 44 and 45 To: Jane , "ports@FreeBSD.org" References: <000001d25c87$0450cbf0$0cf263d0$@quicknet.nl> From: Julian Elischer Message-ID: Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 14:22:23 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <000001d25c87$0450cbf0$0cf263d0$@quicknet.nl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 06:22:34 -0000 On 23/12/2016 3:10 AM, Jane wrote:' what this requires is someone to track it.. how about *you* :-) tracking a port and sending in Makefile updates is not too hard if you keep on top of it.. > Hi, > > > > Is it me or is it lately impossible to keep samba ports updated to their > latest security releases? > > I hope you can find time to update the samba ports more regular. > > > > Also when do we see samba 45 in ports? > > Samba 4.5 = current stable release! I believe we are not updated proper yet. > > This worries me a lot. > > > > > series > > git branch > > status > > started > > maintenance > > security > > discontinued (EOL) > > > 4.6 ( > details) > > master > > > new upcoming release series > > > > 4.5 ( > details) > > > v4-5-test > > > ase> current stable release series > > 2016-09-07 > > > > 4.4 ( > details) > > > v4-4-test > > > maintenance mode > > 2016-03-22 > > 2016-09-07 > > > > 4.3 ( > details) > > > v4-3-test > > > _Mode> security fixes only > > 2015-09-08 > > 2016-03-22 > > 2016-09-07 > > > > > > > > I really do hope samba can get some more attention to keep our servers more > secured and patched. > > > > Thanks for you hard work and hope for a reply of this message. > > > > Signed by > > Kater > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jan 3 10:31:55 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8689BC9D517 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 10:31:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72CCC1147 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 10:31:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 72187C9D516; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 10:31:55 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71B78C9D515 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 10:31:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "vps1.elischer.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A8071146 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 10:31:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from Julian-MBP3.local (ppp121-45-237-203.lns20.per1.internode.on.net [121.45.237.203]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v03AVoKS054329 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 02:31:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Subject: Re: suggested patch for bsd.ports.mk To: "ports@FreeBSD.org" References: From: Julian Elischer Message-ID: <6453cdb9-b27a-e061-7249-51d84dbaefcc@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 18:31:44 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 10:31:55 -0000 Sometime ago I proposed the following change. I got several "yes please" from members of the public, but no actionable response from members of the ports group So I am asking again. As a src committer I don't feel qualified to do the commit myself and would like a guide/mentor for the task if I'm to do it myself. Julian On 13/05/2016 12:11 AM, Julian Elischer wrote: > This patch is pretty self explanatory. > > it allows us to keep patches for various ports separately in a > sparse hierarchy while not having to write to the ports tree itself. > > In case the list scrubs hte text attachment (diff) here's the > description part of the diff. > > >==== //depot/bugatti/FreeBSD-ports-PZ/10.1/Mk/bsd.port.mk#2 (text) > ==== > > @@ -791,6 +791,11 @@ > # The patches specified by this variable will be > # applied after the normal distribution patches but > # before those in ${PATCHDIR}. > +# EXTRA_PATCH_TREE - where to find extra 'out-of-tree' patches > +# Points to a directory hierarchy with the same > layout > +# as the ports tree, where local patches can be > found. > +# This allows a third party to keep their patches in > +# some other source control system if needed. > # PATCH_WRKSRC - Directory to apply patches in. > # Default: ${WRKSRC} > # > > If anyone thinks this is a good idea, I'd like it to go in as we > have to maintain it.. > I could commit it myself but haven't had my ports wings awarded yet.. > > the actual patch is: ==== //depot/bugatti/FreeBSD-ports-PZ/10.1/Mk/bsd.port.mk#2 (text) ==== @@ -749,6 +749,11 @@ # The patches specified by this variable will be # applied after the normal distribution patches but # before those in ${PATCHDIR}. +# EXTRA_PATCH_TREE - where to find extra 'out-of-tree' patches +# Points to a directory hierarchy with the same layout +# as the ports tree, where local patches can be found. +# This allows a third party to keep their patches in +# some other source control system if needed. # PATCH_WRKSRC - Directory to apply patches in. # Default: ${WRKSRC} # @@ -3145,6 +3150,36 @@ done; \ fi; \ fi +.if defined(EXTRA_PATCH_TREE) + @set -e ;\ + if [ -d ${EXTRA_PATCH_TREE}/${PKGORIGIN} ]; then \ + if [ "`${ECHO_CMD} ${EXTRA_PATCH_TREE}/${PKGORIGIN}/patch-*`" != "${EXTRA_PATCH_TREE}/${PKGORIGIN}/patch-*" ]; then \ + ${ECHO_MSG} "===> Applying local patches for ${PKGNAME}" ; \ + PATCHES_APPLIED="" ; \ + for i in ${EXTRA_PATCH_TREE}/${PKGORIGIN}/patch-*; do \ + case $$i in \ + *.orig|*.rej|*~|*,v) \ + ${ECHO_MSG} "===> Ignoring local patchfile $$i" ; \ + ;; \ + *) \ + if [ ${PATCH_DEBUG_TMP} = yes ]; then \ + ${ECHO_MSG} "===> Applying local patch $$i" ; \ + fi; \ + if ${PATCH} ${PATCH_ARGS} < $$i ; then \ + PATCHES_APPLIED="$$PATCHES_APPLIED $$i" ; \ + else \ + ${ECHO_MSG} `${ECHO_CMD} "=> Local patch $$i failed to apply cleanly." | ${SED} "s|${EXTRA_PATCH_TREE}/${PKGORIGIN}/||"` ; \ + if [ x"$$PATCHES_APPLIED" != x"" -a ${PATCH_SILENT} != "yes" ]; then \ + ${ECHO_MSG} `${ECHO_CMD} "=> Patch(es) $$PATCHES_APPLIED applied cleanly." | ${SED} "s|${EXTRA_PATCH_TREE}/${PKGORIGIN}/||g"` ; \ + fi; \ + ${FALSE} ; \ + fi; \ + ;; \ + esac; \ + done; \ + fi; \ + fi +.endif .endif .if !target(run-autotools-fixup) From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jan 3 10:44:40 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89CF1C9D73A for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 10:44:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vlad-fbsd@acheronmedia.com) Received: from mail.irealone.com (xoth.irealone.hr [136.243.79.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 538A31604 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 10:44:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vlad-fbsd@acheronmedia.com) Received: by mail.irealone.com (Postfix, from userid 58) id 118877DDA; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 11:44:29 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on postfix.xoth.irealone.hr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, LOCAL_TO_FBSD_PORTS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from mail.irealone.com (unknown [10.0.0.10]) by mail.irealone.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1DAC7DD6 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 11:44:28 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 11:44:28 +0100 From: "Vlad K." To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: suggested patch for bsd.ports.mk Organization: Acheron Media In-Reply-To: <6453cdb9-b27a-e061-7249-51d84dbaefcc@freebsd.org> References: <6453cdb9-b27a-e061-7249-51d84dbaefcc@freebsd.org> Message-ID: <02ae9e5851ff1469d61bfead9cabb836@acheronmedia.com> X-Sender: vlad-fbsd@acheronmedia.com User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 10:44:40 -0000 On 2017-01-03 11:31, Julian Elischer wrote: > Sometime ago I proposed the following change. > > I got several "yes please" from members of the public, > but no actionable response from members of the ports group > So I am asking again. I haven't checked the code in detail for correctness, but conceptually this is nice. I wanted to propose something like this last year, inspired by Gentoo's ability to just drop a patch in a directory in /etc which would be picked up automatically by portage. However, I was convinced that it's unnecessary work because any custom patches can be added directly to the /files/ directory of the port and if using svn'd ports tree, it's easy to track and even push upstream. But seeing that someone else now thinks this is good too, I'd like to cast my vote again for this. Yes, it's easy to do it with svn, but with something like this it should be possible to add an ability for Poudriere (and Synth?) to track multiple patches for multiple sets without the need to "pollute" the ports tree. Why? A/B testing, different arches - different patches, etc.... So here: YES PLEASE. Julian, did you put it up for comments on reviews.freebsd.org? -- Vlad K. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jan 3 11:00:47 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD0F9C9DC9F for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 11:00:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8955125B for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 11:00:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A7E79C9DC9E; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 11:00:47 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A78AFC9DC9D for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 11:00:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "vps1.elischer.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F26D1259; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 11:00:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from Julian-MBP3.local (ppp121-45-237-203.lns20.per1.internode.on.net [121.45.237.203]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v03B0gK7054476 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 3 Jan 2017 03:00:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Subject: Re: suggested patch for bsd.ports.mk To: "ports@FreeBSD.org" , FreeBSD Ports Management Team References: <6453cdb9-b27a-e061-7249-51d84dbaefcc@freebsd.org> From: Julian Elischer Message-ID: Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 19:00:37 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6453cdb9-b27a-e061-7249-51d84dbaefcc@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 11:00:47 -0000 On 3/01/2017 6:31 PM, Julian Elischer wrote: > Sometime ago I proposed the following change. > > I got several "yes please" from members of the public, > but no actionable response from members of the ports group > So I am asking again. > > As a src committer I don't feel qualified to do the commit myself > and would like a guide/mentor for the task if I'm to do it myself. see also: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215726 > > Julian > > On 13/05/2016 12:11 AM, Julian Elischer wrote: >> This patch is pretty self explanatory. >> >> it allows us to keep patches for various ports separately in a >> sparse hierarchy while not having to write to the ports tree itself. >> >> In case the list scrubs hte text attachment (diff) here's the >> description part of the diff. >> >> >==== //depot/bugatti/FreeBSD-ports-PZ/10.1/Mk/bsd.port.mk#2 (text) >> ==== >> >> @@ -791,6 +791,11 @@ >> # The patches specified by this variable will be >> # applied after the normal distribution patches but >> # before those in ${PATCHDIR}. >> +# EXTRA_PATCH_TREE - where to find extra 'out-of-tree' patches >> +# Points to a directory hierarchy with the same >> layout >> +# as the ports tree, where local patches can be >> found. >> +# This allows a third party to keep their patches in >> +# some other source control system if needed. >> # PATCH_WRKSRC - Directory to apply patches in. >> # Default: ${WRKSRC} >> # >> >> If anyone thinks this is a good idea, I'd like it to go in as we >> have to maintain it.. >> I could commit it myself but haven't had my ports wings awarded yet.. >> >> > the actual patch is: > > > ==== //depot/bugatti/FreeBSD-ports-PZ/10.1/Mk/bsd.port.mk#2 (text) ==== > > @@ -749,6 +749,11 @@ > # The patches specified by this variable will be > # applied after the normal distribution patches but > # before those in ${PATCHDIR}. > +# EXTRA_PATCH_TREE - where to find extra 'out-of-tree' patches > +# Points to a directory hierarchy with the same > layout > +# as the ports tree, where local patches can be > found. > +# This allows a third party to keep their patches in > +# some other source control system if needed. > # PATCH_WRKSRC - Directory to apply patches in. > # Default: ${WRKSRC} > # > @@ -3145,6 +3150,36 @@ > done; \ > fi; \ > fi > +.if defined(EXTRA_PATCH_TREE) > + @set -e ;\ > + if [ -d ${EXTRA_PATCH_TREE}/${PKGORIGIN} ]; then \ > + if [ "`${ECHO_CMD} > ${EXTRA_PATCH_TREE}/${PKGORIGIN}/patch-*`" != > "${EXTRA_PATCH_TREE}/${PKGORIGIN}/patch-*" ]; then \ > + ${ECHO_MSG} "===> Applying local patches for > ${PKGNAME}" ; \ > + PATCHES_APPLIED="" ; \ > + for i in ${EXTRA_PATCH_TREE}/${PKGORIGIN}/patch-*; do \ > + case $$i in \ > + *.orig|*.rej|*~|*,v) \ > + ${ECHO_MSG} "===> Ignoring local > patchfile $$i" ; \ > + ;; \ > + *) \ > + if [ ${PATCH_DEBUG_TMP} = yes ]; then \ > + ${ECHO_MSG} "===> Applying local > patch $$i" ; \ > + fi; \ > + if ${PATCH} ${PATCH_ARGS} < $$i ; then \ > + PATCHES_APPLIED="$$PATCHES_APPLIED $$i" > ; \ > + else \ > + ${ECHO_MSG} `${ECHO_CMD} "=> Local > patch $$i failed to apply cleanly." | ${SED} > "s|${EXTRA_PATCH_TREE}/${PKGORIGIN}/||"` ; \ > + if [ x"$$PATCHES_APPLIED" != x"" -a > ${PATCH_SILENT} != "yes" ]; then \ > + ${ECHO_MSG} `${ECHO_CMD} "=> > Patch(es) $$PATCHES_APPLIED applied cleanly." | ${SED} > "s|${EXTRA_PATCH_TREE}/${PKGORIGIN}/||g"` ; \ > + fi; \ > + ${FALSE} ; \ > + fi; \ > + ;; \ > + esac; \ > + done; \ > + fi; \ > + fi > +.endif > .endif > > .if !target(run-autotools-fixup) > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jan 3 12:29:16 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82AC7C9D3D6 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 12:29:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alert@vindazo.be) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA48148A for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 12:29:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alert@vindazo.be) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 6EF6AC9D3D5; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 12:29:16 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E999C9D3D4 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 12:29:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alert@vindazo.be) Received: from vindazo.be (alert.vindazo.be [144.76.216.109]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9DE61489 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 12:29:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alert@vindazo.be) Received: from Ubuntu-1310-saucy-64-minimal (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vindazo.be (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B89A4217CA for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 13:29:07 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=vindazo.be; s=mail; t=1483446547; bh=vo+Oox4/uBMW64fvLIQ/kKlIua95b8BtjLIlYvE5BK8=; h=Subject:From:To:Date:From; b=xJ7WPXkoa8xbplOLOOv6uWM5F07OJP3yv5MANQg09vZYyp0uQcYYsKzK9pImyN3kc 3TI7TeLXZUBvD11H8/TUxbEWcM1UlcL062/68QK9j9J5RcL6+izphr7xpY+rzNTHB8 +iEB7H+bZ460susnEDjyNLz+Hb5YuYRDiTWiVp3w= Subject: Nieuwe vacatures voor verkoper 2017-01-03 From: alert@vindazo.be To: ports@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 12:29:07 -0000 Message-ID: <20170103122907.22875.695@Ubuntu-1310-saucy-64-minimal> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 12:29:16 -0000 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jan 3 15:04:56 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873CCC9D30C for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 15:04:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "vps1.elischer.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 655C21F4D for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 15:04:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from Julian-MBP3.local (ppp121-45-237-203.lns20.per1.internode.on.net [121.45.237.203]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v03F4lvP055633 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Tue, 3 Jan 2017 07:04:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Subject: Re: suggested patch for bsd.ports.mk To: "Vlad K." , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <6453cdb9-b27a-e061-7249-51d84dbaefcc@freebsd.org> <02ae9e5851ff1469d61bfead9cabb836@acheronmedia.com> From: Julian Elischer Message-ID: <5ed1a51a-d44e-d85b-4253-e3f72a1bad3e@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 23:04:41 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <02ae9e5851ff1469d61bfead9cabb836@acheronmedia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 15:04:56 -0000 On 3/01/2017 6:44 PM, Vlad K. wrote: > On 2017-01-03 11:31, Julian Elischer wrote: >> Sometime ago I proposed the following change. >> >> I got several "yes please" from members of the public, >> but no actionable response from members of the ports group >> So I am asking again. > > > I haven't checked the code in detail for correctness, but > conceptually this is nice. I wanted to propose something like this > last year, inspired by Gentoo's ability to just drop a patch in a > directory in /etc which would be picked up automatically by portage. > > However, I was convinced that it's unnecessary work because any > custom patches can be added directly to the /files/ directory of the > port and if using svn'd ports tree, it's easy to track and even push > upstream. > > But seeing that someone else now thinks this is good too, I'd like > to cast my vote again for this. Yes, it's easy to do it with svn, > but with something like this it should be possible to add an ability > for Poudriere (and Synth?) to track multiple patches for multiple > sets without the need to "pollute" the ports tree. Why? A/B testing, > different arches - different patches, etc.... > > So here: YES PLEASE. > > Julian, did you put it up for comments on reviews.freebsd.org? no I did not. I'm not sure how I would do that clicking on the 'diff' button on the bug attachment gives a nice view of the patch. > > From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jan 3 16:16:19 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E889C9DF9E for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:16:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vlad-fbsd@acheronmedia.com) Received: from mail.irealone.com (xoth.irealone.hr [136.243.79.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDB7F15F9 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:16:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vlad-fbsd@acheronmedia.com) Received: by mail.irealone.com (Postfix, from userid 58) id CB369753B; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 17:16:15 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on postfix.xoth.irealone.hr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, LOCAL_TO_FBSD_PORTS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from mail.irealone.com (unknown [10.0.0.10]) by mail.irealone.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8154A7537 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 17:16:15 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 17:16:15 +0100 From: "Vlad K." To: Freebsd Ports Subject: Ports' tips and gotchas Organization: Acheron Media Message-ID: X-Sender: vlad-fbsd@acheronmedia.com User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 16:16:19 -0000 I've submitted a patch for Postgres server ports with a note about enabling checksumming (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214671). I'm now preparing to submit a patch with a similar "Nice to know" tip for Roundcube (changing default_host breaks the user profiles, and how to fix it). Is pkg-message the right place for such tips and gotchas? Do we need a separate mechanism where users could collate and submit tips they find important when installing/upgrading/configuring the port (yeah, those three exact use cases, I'm sure pkg-message is not the best place for regular usage tips). Aside from UPDATING of course, which is just supposed to be important notes about one-time updates/upgrades. -- Vlad K. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jan 3 16:33:42 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACCBEC9DA66 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:33:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C3561678 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:33:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6CE328412; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 17:33:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from illbsd.quip.test (ip-86-49-16-209.net.upcbroadband.cz [86.49.16.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A045728437; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 17:33:38 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Ports' tips and gotchas To: "Vlad K." , Freebsd Ports References: From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Message-ID: <586BD262.3000709@quip.cz> Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 17:33:38 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/42.0 SeaMonkey/2.39 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 16:33:42 -0000 Vlad K. wrote on 2017/01/03 17:16: > > I've submitted a patch for Postgres server ports with a note about > enabling checksumming > (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214671). I'm now > preparing to submit a patch with a similar "Nice to know" tip for > Roundcube (changing default_host breaks the user profiles, and how to > fix it). > > Is pkg-message the right place for such tips and gotchas? Do we need a > separate mechanism where users could collate and submit tips they find > important when installing/upgrading/configuring the port (yeah, those > three exact use cases, I'm sure pkg-message is not the best place for > regular usage tips). Aside from UPDATING of course, which is just > supposed to be important notes about one-time updates/upgrades. Until we have anything better I think pkg-message is the right place for these tips. Some ports already use pkg-message for some recommendations. Miroslav Lachman From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jan 3 16:33:41 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D78AC9DA5D for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:33:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mokhi64@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it0-x234.google.com (mail-it0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDC4D1668 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:33:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mokhi64@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it0-x234.google.com with SMTP id c20so288365134itb.0 for ; Tue, 03 Jan 2017 08:33:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=XmBqwZEP99rE6ToZRdCtWHpUmDvEqE58FLbtBdzJEOU=; b=Go3eAJd9QxNj73zi+DmwZt/2IMptC/+Qg0QFyPHPuAdE1psYxMIy8gKnPNOYcVfNtf uLiFRPwiK10yoBrIrcdIlH+f3htz59zG0gyKRQ8Z1aKeVqsBeNVIr5KDm6xDXJNwtK/a S46CP2sGitkU4aA6c/pS86QsTteGEnBGAlnoggAwbxHpg/TuOJQLfLV7u/dbSS+sLF0a wv8eZ0ON+1gWKgHV3SFnXqHN48WOp79dNElkwxkM5CJHzU9TvUaNa2N9Lj3WVD/3q5to 8oPZ8HXUfxoffVTiH0PxuwSKopXOva90XIws3bvbbwKy6n3xGhWpY0nV1/0u0iTQO3Fx tPeA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=XmBqwZEP99rE6ToZRdCtWHpUmDvEqE58FLbtBdzJEOU=; b=QxtJlyTChteDqSwP1xjOSTWIz7t0Rgdxex/nspypx0d+oKaX2BOoOlh/BHSSbjNZZi 1vKjXVM1igs+IPXj3VAoBX7Jl7UJraEj2wLFdik8p6lL/Jt5ny3v+N+tbXLYNQQpr8wo nSiA0jferar7i53pFtQxUqd8CmpDKefMXb/DMsfzVAieXdbY9RbiCjF124q8fTzbhhPm VQmMSMvVIc0Pp8QHYA+BZTQtPLFR3IaBOuTn6zVFROSZ107vkO5W5MZy8LCeTY+HWImB Ol1n8AneVlcAHpMApUoZZ2rf3036AigXdK1iSs+r0I1iFMIbAWiGpeVfP7DSQavrwBaW NTLQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJ3XYigvqm9g5UttWbGiW2m9l9hrzQv53wzgS8dfY9Cppie/LNAhPenGku+8neDIGEgKncboo7Dyjq0tQ== X-Received: by 10.36.103.198 with SMTP id u189mr49034556itc.9.1483461220198; Tue, 03 Jan 2017 08:33:40 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.153.14 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 08:33:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: mokhi Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 20:03:39 +0330 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Ports' tips and gotchas To: "Vlad K." Cc: Freebsd Ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 16:33:41 -0000 Hi. As far as i understood, `pkg-message` is a place for every point you want people installing it to know. maybe if you are adding a daemon/service you can mention some points on error-cases in it. Best wishes, Mokhi. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jan 3 16:43:21 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A610AC9DECA for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:43:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from anoxia.adamw.org (anoxia.adamw.org [104.225.8.149]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "anoxia.adamw.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69E1A1F18 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 16:43:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by anoxia.adamw.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 4655efa8 TLS version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 09:43:14 -0700 (MST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\)) Subject: Re: Ports' tips and gotchas From: Adam Weinberger In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 09:43:12 -0700 Cc: Freebsd Ports Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: "Vlad K." X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 16:43:21 -0000 > On 3 Jan, 2017, at 9:16, Vlad K. wrote: >=20 >=20 > I've submitted a patch for Postgres server ports with a note about = enabling checksumming = (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D214671). I'm now = preparing to submit a patch with a similar "Nice to know" tip for = Roundcube (changing default_host breaks the user profiles, and how to = fix it). >=20 > Is pkg-message the right place for such tips and gotchas? Do we need a = separate mechanism where users could collate and submit tips they find = important when installing/upgrading/configuring the port (yeah, those = three exact use cases, I'm sure pkg-message is not the best place for = regular usage tips). Aside from UPDATING of course, which is just = supposed to be important notes about one-time updates/upgrades. No, pkg-message is not the right place. pkg-message should be for "Where = do I start?" or for FreeBSD-specific instructions. Tips, gotchas, = interesting discoveries, bugs, foibles, shortcuts, etc. shouldn't go = into the pkg-message. They should be on a blog, on a website, on a wiki, = submitted upstream for inclusion in manpages or README files, etc. pkg-message needs to contain only essential information, otherwise = end-users will start to ignore them. I agree that tips should be shared, = but putting it into SVN isn't the way to go. # Adam --=20 Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jan 3 17:16:31 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 028E4C9DC3F for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 17:16:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vlad-fbsd@acheronmedia.com) Received: from mail.irealone.com (xoth.irealone.hr [136.243.79.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C025216CB for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 17:16:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vlad-fbsd@acheronmedia.com) Received: by mail.irealone.com (Postfix, from userid 58) id 37C1675AA; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 18:16:27 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on postfix.xoth.irealone.hr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, LOCAL_TO_FBSD_PORTS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from mail.irealone.com (unknown [10.0.0.10]) by mail.irealone.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD04975A6 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 18:16:26 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 18:16:26 +0100 From: "Vlad K." To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports' tips and gotchas Organization: Acheron Media In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <76519193d791325700c3beb34b8f447b@acheronmedia.com> X-Sender: vlad-fbsd@acheronmedia.com User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 17:16:31 -0000 On 2017-01-03 17:43, Adam Weinberger wrote: > > pkg-message needs to contain only essential information, otherwise > end-users will start to ignore them. I agree that tips should be > shared, but putting it into SVN isn't the way to go. That's something along the lines of what I was thinking, but wasn't sure. Indeed if we start adding tips to pkg-message, where's the end of it. However, in the case of my Postgres patch, it's something the user should be aware of BEFORE they do the initdb step, as once initialized, you can't change it for that cluster, without dumping the database, re-initializing and restoring, that's why I wanted to add it there. Unfortunately, random blogs and websites are not good enough because the information is "out there" and not immediately presented. However, now that you mention it, adding wiki entries and then having a pkg-message contain something along the lines of "Please consult https://wiki.freebsd.org/Foo/Bar for important information before you init/start/configure/migrate/update, ..." is a valid alternative and I like it. In fact, I'll be reworking my Postgres patch to do just that, and create an entry for Roundcube. However, what would be the best way to approach this via the FreeBSD wiki? I'm sure that random wiki pages in various users' namespaces is not quite the right thing to do. There currently are some ports Wiki pages but they're all over the place and not nicely organized. Perhaps it is time we start a special Ports namespace that would allow us to collate and list in one place all the user submitted wisdom and important instructions? -- Vlad K. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jan 3 17:28:30 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46AE0C9D267 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 17:28:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com) Received: from echo.brtsvcs.net (echo.brtsvcs.net [IPv6:2607:f740:c::4ae]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35D591EFB for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 17:28:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com) Received: from chombo.houseloki.net (unknown [IPv6:2601:1c2:1401:9956:21c:c0ff:fe7f:96ee]) by echo.brtsvcs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E74950007; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 17:28:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:fe80::7102:4df8:1f13:5c55] (unknown [IPv6:fe80::7102:4df8:1f13:5c55]) by chombo.houseloki.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 74D751C93; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 09:28:28 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Ports' tips and gotchas To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>, "Vlad K." , Freebsd Ports References: <586BD262.3000709@quip.cz> From: Mel Pilgrim Message-ID: <356d9f34-b668-967b-15d4-0256513b016a@bluerosetech.com> Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 09:28:28 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <586BD262.3000709@quip.cz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 17:28:30 -0000 On 01/03/2017 08:33, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > Vlad K. wrote on 2017/01/03 17:16: >> >> I've submitted a patch for Postgres server ports with a note about >> enabling checksumming >> (https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214671). I'm now >> preparing to submit a patch with a similar "Nice to know" tip for >> Roundcube (changing default_host breaks the user profiles, and how to >> fix it). >> >> Is pkg-message the right place for such tips and gotchas? Do we need a >> separate mechanism where users could collate and submit tips they find >> important when installing/upgrading/configuring the port (yeah, those >> three exact use cases, I'm sure pkg-message is not the best place for >> regular usage tips). Aside from UPDATING of course, which is just >> supposed to be important notes about one-time updates/upgrades. > > Until we have anything better I think pkg-message is the right place for > these tips. Some ports already use pkg-message for some recommendations. If the pkg-message addition covers a change introduced with an update to the port, considering adding it to UPDATING as well. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jan 3 17:29:52 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 249F8C9D305 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 17:29:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DDBA41FD5 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 17:29:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84EF728417; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 18:29:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from illbsd.quip.test (ip-86-49-16-209.net.upcbroadband.cz [86.49.16.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A54F428429; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 18:29:48 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Ports' tips and gotchas To: Adam Weinberger , "Vlad K." Cc: Freebsd Ports References: From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Message-ID: <586BDF8C.5090504@quip.cz> Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 18:29:48 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/42.0 SeaMonkey/2.39 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 17:29:52 -0000 Adam Weinberger wrote on 2017/01/03 17:43: > pkg-message needs to contain only essential information, But it is not true and never was. pkg-message always contains many other informations. Or are these really essential? Message from postgresql94-client-9.4.10_1: The PostgreSQL port has a collection of "side orders": postgresql-docs For all of the html documentation p5-Pg A perl5 API for client access to PostgreSQL databases. postgresql-tcltk If you want tcl/tk client support. postgresql-jdbc For Java JDBC support. postgresql-odbc For client access from unix applications using ODBC as access method. Not needed to access unix PostgreSQL servers from Win32 using ODBC. See below. ruby-postgres, py-PyGreSQL For client access to PostgreSQL databases using the ruby & python languages. postgresql-plperl, postgresql-pltcl & postgresql-plruby For using perl5, tcl & ruby as procedural languages. postgresql-contrib Lots of contributed utilities, postgresql functions and datatypes. There you find pg_standby, pgcrypto and many other cool things. > otherwise end-users will start to ignore them. Yes, it applies for PHP extensions spam on each `pkg upgrade` where I get about 20 messages in a row like this: Message from php56-zlib-5.6.29: **************************************************************************** The following line has been added to your /usr/local/etc/php/ext-20-zlib.ini configuration file to automatically load the installed extension: extension=zlib.so Totally useless messages taking about 150 lines... Extensions were always automatically enabled on installation before converting from one php.ini file to many small files. Miroslav Lachman From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jan 3 18:22:05 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAECCC9D673 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 18:22:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pz-freebsd-ports@ziemba.us) Received: from osmtp.ziemba.us (osmtp.ziemba.us [208.106.105.149]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70FF31E1B for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 18:22:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pz-freebsd-ports@ziemba.us) Received: from hairball.ziemba.us (localhost.ziemba.us [127.0.0.1]) by hairball.ziemba.us (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id v03IEdAM013687 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 10:14:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pz-freebsd-ports@ziemba.us) Received: (from mailnull@localhost) by hairball.ziemba.us (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id v03IEds7013686 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 10:14:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pz-freebsd-ports@ziemba.us) X-Authentication-Warning: hairball.ziemba.us: mailnull set sender to pz-freebsd-ports@ziemba.us using -f Received: (from news@localhost) by usenet.ziemba.us (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id v03ICShJ060552 for treehouse-mail-freebsd-ports@hairball.ziemba.us; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 10:12:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from news) From: "G. Paul Ziemba" To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: suggested patch for bsd.ports.mk Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 18:12:28 +0000 (UTC) Message-id: References: <6453cdb9-b27a-e061-7249-51d84dbaefcc@freebsd.org> Reply-to: unp@ziemba.us Errors-to: "G. Paul Ziemba" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 18:22:05 -0000 julian@freebsd.org (Julian Elischer) writes: >Sometime ago I proposed the following change. >I got several "yes please" from members of the public, >but no actionable response from members of the ports group >So I am asking again. >> +# EXTRA_PATCH_TREE - where to find extra 'out-of-tree' patches >> +# Points to a directory hierarchy with the same >> layout >> +# as the ports tree, where local patches can be >> found. >> +# This allows a third party to keep their patches in >> +# some other source control system if needed. > [...] Thank you for raising this question. I may have given one of the above-mentioned "yes" responses, and am still enthusiastically in favor of this patch. We have been discussing it for at least the last eight years (CF the thread started at on Dec 1, 2008, which references this very patch from Dmitry Marakasov). I have used it in my (admittedly very small) network since then, first for building ports in situ and more recently with poudriere. It's been invaluable in helping me manage site-local changes. -- G. Paul Ziemba FreeBSD unix: 10:11AM up 135 days, 13:50, 17 users, load averages: 0.42, 0.28, 0.25 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jan 3 18:55:10 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97E18C9D956 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 18:55:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [192.108.105.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.soaustin.net", Issuer "StartCom Class 2 IV Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 813BB1A6D for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 18:55:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from lonesome.com (bones.soaustin.net [192.108.105.22]) by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C71162846; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 12:55:02 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 12:55:01 -0600 From: Mark Linimon To: "Vlad K." Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports' tips and gotchas Message-ID: <20170103185501.GA14779@lonesome.com> References: <76519193d791325700c3beb34b8f447b@acheronmedia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <76519193d791325700c3beb34b8f447b@acheronmedia.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 18:55:10 -0000 On Tue, Jan 03, 2017 at 06:16:26PM +0100, Vlad K. wrote: > However, what would be the best way to approach this via the FreeBSD wiki? > I'm sure that random wiki pages in various users' namespaces is not quite > the right thing to do. There currently are some ports Wiki pages but they're > all over the place and not nicely organized. For right now I think your pages are fine. The wiki doesn't have much of a "structure" right now. I did some prototype pages for a restructuring but it got bogged down due to internal politics. It needs several months' worth of surgery. I nibble at parts of it every once in a while until I remember why I got frustrated :-) mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jan 3 19:42:51 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59EC7C9DDB2 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 19:42:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vlad-fbsd@acheronmedia.com) Received: from mail.irealone.com (xoth.irealone.hr [136.243.79.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22D8912FC for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 19:42:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vlad-fbsd@acheronmedia.com) Received: by mail.irealone.com (Postfix, from userid 58) id 435FD76A9; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 20:42:47 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on postfix.xoth.irealone.hr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, LOCAL_TO_FBSD_PORTS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from mail.irealone.com (unknown [10.0.0.10]) by mail.irealone.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F257F76A4 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 20:42:46 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 20:42:46 +0100 From: "Vlad K." To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports' tips and gotchas Organization: Acheron Media In-Reply-To: <20170103185501.GA14779@lonesome.com> References: <76519193d791325700c3beb34b8f447b@acheronmedia.com> <20170103185501.GA14779@lonesome.com> Message-ID: <9462a76faf9a6560ab6a45c01933f512@acheronmedia.com> X-Sender: vlad-fbsd@acheronmedia.com User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 19:42:51 -0000 On 2017-01-03 19:55, Mark Linimon wrote: > The wiki doesn't have much of a "structure" right now. I did some > prototype > pages for a restructuring but it got bogged down due to internal > politics. I wanna hear all about it and see what you got, merge with my ideas. -- Vlad K. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Jan 3 20:05:31 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1045BC9D84F for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 20:05:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 001BA1736 for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 20:05:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id F397FC9D84E; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 20:05:30 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F34B1C9D84D for ; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 20:05:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD88A1735; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 20:05:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1cOVKu-000FJG-F1; Tue, 03 Jan 2017 21:05:32 +0100 Date: Tue, 3 Jan 2017 21:05:32 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Julian Elischer Cc: "ports@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: suggested patch for bsd.ports.mk Message-ID: <20170103200532.GZ2648@home.opsec.eu> References: <6453cdb9-b27a-e061-7249-51d84dbaefcc@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6453cdb9-b27a-e061-7249-51d84dbaefcc@freebsd.org> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 20:05:31 -0000 Hi! > I got several "yes please" from members of the public, > but no actionable response from members of the ports group > So I am asking again. I'd also like to have this patch. If I look at the PR, mat is already working to integrate it. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 3 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jan 4 09:09:32 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C27BC9DFBE for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 09:09:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19B2D16E6 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 09:09:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 19158C9DFBC; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 09:09:32 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18BDCC9DFBB for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 09:09:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (portscout.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C13716E5 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 09:09:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v0499VBo008608 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 09:09:31 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v0499VV1008595; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 09:09:31 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201701040909.v0499VV1008595@portscout.ysv.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.ysv.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 09:09:31 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 09:09:32 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/node-thrift | 0.9.3 | 0.10.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/thrift-c_glib | 0.9.3 | 0.10.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ math/giacxcas | 1.2.2-57 | 1.2.3-9 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jan 4 09:50:53 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3AEFC9BDE2 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 09:50:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x229.google.com (mail-wm0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88FC01F71 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 09:50:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x229.google.com with SMTP id t79so451460639wmt.0 for ; Wed, 04 Jan 2017 01:50:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Rk1vdP5x7KABKKUMlt7p7OxVBdfLhfCbXFmjhUTkyQ4=; b=sP2tyiqs9a0iHqWiXy4k8VDKuznIHklHvi81bnpMGPxYxWUE/pUdbTZeUJ2kHhq24b fkF0TfRqAIIEqLZrtgimr1VCXCYaXtD2JzGYbzNIEBA7koOIMZBY3I+1gDNZWVrcGkv8 f4pWJxJhHkC/Iibab9LUvKv3RQ+L6XGMoKToD7yKt/nVqthpFy5faNPmNAM6vr/B6Hn2 3Gddy4/coNR7gYqHwyybToHeT0YbHGUCKXLYud1XWt8Lypg+OWxfL6YRr/5PZ++3rNUc uiBlrAAm8sLLSa1ZFt3cOipKqXo0D/9aeXNlAyTeV6GHV3ZVJ/3yjR6xG/qqrsckEy4q hQSg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Rk1vdP5x7KABKKUMlt7p7OxVBdfLhfCbXFmjhUTkyQ4=; b=KQISi06U74L7WNKGYpnEjfwa7QoUijnvacQSxS3T82TA05it++aw4Zv2iJil8qJkPk o17Tm97DqmKNDFlumD6jI3ICDOKaGI7NUewiGiTrVE4jUsZtsKwp5ecKmIr0Sx9iGnau Ayva3xFbDJ0OYTP8a6+c8+rwA11KiY+ST7n+f3steojcaL47sNHwE+w8K/7rIpL+ELKs rebuDmucEDU7QqZMUMkH4bwZnnVz/gsSIS+zfNj0A8BZQhwEtfkXc3/MeRg4Fel+ZPhB 4a9Zir3hDLoV+Dcb8BIDxJTmxZQA92Clx/SLeWZkbG3wqus9Rvl9IdW8A2WAqpMkwmsM Ar+Q== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJVhH3IrUt2rXRoOwjLZGoQObhEX9J2zm/aBsHNkT7wGlGjXakh5+d5dsgiqcbKc0Vq656KpS1faJ/OHw== X-Received: by 10.28.145.210 with SMTP id t201mr45976043wmd.37.1483523451890; Wed, 04 Jan 2017 01:50:51 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.240.4 with HTTP; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 01:50:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <76519193d791325700c3beb34b8f447b@acheronmedia.com> References: <76519193d791325700c3beb34b8f447b@acheronmedia.com> From: Ben Woods Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 17:50:51 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Ports' tips and gotchas To: "Vlad K." Cc: FreeBSD ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 09:50:54 -0000 On 4 January 2017 at 01:16, Vlad K. wrote: > On 2017-01-03 17:43, Adam Weinberger wrote: > >> >> pkg-message needs to contain only essential information, otherwise >> end-users will start to ignore them. I agree that tips should be >> shared, but putting it into SVN isn't the way to go. >> > > ... > Unfortunately, random blogs and websites are not good enough because the > information is "out there" and not immediately presented. However, now that > you mention it, adding wiki entries and then having a pkg-message contain > something along the lines of "Please consult > https://wiki.freebsd.org/Foo/Bar for important information before you > init/start/configure/migrate/update, ..." is a valid alternative and I > like it. In fact, I'll be reworking my Postgres patch to do just that, and > create an entry for Roundcube. > > However, what would be the best way to approach this via the FreeBSD wiki? > I'm sure that random wiki pages in various users' namespaces is not quite > the right thing to do. There currently are some ports Wiki pages but > they're all over the place and not nicely organized. > > Perhaps it is time we start a special Ports namespace that would allow us > to collate and list in one place all the user submitted wisdom and > important instructions? > I wanted to chime in with a +1 for this idea. I have often thought that the FreeBSD wiki should contain a space for ports help wikis, that can initially be created by the maintainer, but other's could also add their tips and tricks. It is often said that FreeBSD has great documentation, but only if the help you are looking for is in the handbook. For many ports this is not the case, and projects like ArchLinux have far better documentation for how to use their packages. Some examples where the FreeBSD handbook and wiki have entries which don't focus on explaining how the user should use the system / tips and tricks associated with how to use it with FreeBSD: Xfce - a few tips in the handbook, and porting status in wiki. Compare that to the extensive help provided in the ArchLinux wiki. https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/x11-wm.html#x11-wm-xfce https://wiki.freebsd.org/Xfce https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Xfce Samba - a bit more detail in the handbook this time, but no where near as much guidance as in the ArchLinux wiki: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-samba.html https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Samba Some examples from Arch Linux that I think would make great FreeBSD wiki port help articles: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Thunar https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/ConsoleKit https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Polkit https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/LightDM So what I would like: agree on a place/structure for maintainers to add "how to use this port / how it works / tips and tricks" information, and let's get to writing some! The wiki is a great place, due to the low barrier to entry, and low need to scrutiny due to it being somewhat "unofficial" or unsanitised. Regards, Ben -- From: Benjamin Woods woodsb02@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jan 4 12:32:42 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07AC1C9C887 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 12:32:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vlad-fbsd@acheronmedia.com) Received: from mail.irealone.com (xoth.irealone.hr [136.243.79.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C420A1518 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 12:32:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vlad-fbsd@acheronmedia.com) Received: by mail.irealone.com (Postfix, from userid 58) id 37DD97C46; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 13:32:32 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on postfix.xoth.irealone.hr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, LOCAL_TO_FBSD_PORTS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from mail.irealone.com (unknown [10.0.0.10]) by mail.irealone.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4B867C42 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 13:32:31 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 13:32:31 +0100 From: "Vlad K." To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports' tips and gotchas Organization: Acheron Media In-Reply-To: References: <76519193d791325700c3beb34b8f447b@acheronmedia.com> Message-ID: X-Sender: vlad-fbsd@acheronmedia.com User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 12:32:42 -0000 On 2017-01-04 10:50, Ben Woods wrote: > > I have often thought that the FreeBSD wiki should contain a space for > ports > help wikis, that can initially be created by the maintainer, but > other's > could also add their tips and tricks. > > It is often said that FreeBSD has great documentation, but only if the > help > you are looking for is in the handbook. For many ports this is not the > case, and projects like ArchLinux have far better documentation for how > to > use their packages. I have started a "proof of concept" section under my namespace, available here: https://wiki.freebsd.org/VladimirKrstulja/PortsTipsTricksAndGotchas It's just a starting layout with a couple of entries about issues mentioned in this thread that got this going. Personally, I'm not sure we should be replicating the width and detail of wikis like ArchLinux'. The primary intent behind this is to offer some crucial and important information that's not immediately obvious to new users, or to list some information that is repeatedly being asked about, otherwise we again risk drowning out important info. So if we really wanted to build a database of information of that magnitude, I believe we should be careful to properly structure and namespace such information so that these important bits are visible first, and the "less important info and/or already available elsewhere" be linked externally or as a sub-page. I primarily want to make a "meta-database" of important information from which all other information is easily accessible. And most importantly: kept up to date. With that I wholeheartedly agree that the maintainers should (per RFC2119 meaning of "should") create a page for ports they maintain and include all the important info there, which can then be expanded by anyone. Just thinking out loud here. -- Vlad K. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jan 4 17:43:24 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14A31C9FDD5 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 17:43:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citapm.icyb.net.ua (citapm.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 510521F23 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 17:43:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citapm.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id TAA24979 for ; Wed, 04 Jan 2017 19:34:18 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1cOpS6-00069B-4t for freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2017 19:34:18 +0200 To: ports From: Andriy Gapon Subject: openldap-client vs openldap-sasl-client Message-ID: Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 19:32:56 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 17:43:24 -0000 Do you I understand correctly that it is impossible now to install both samba44 and libreoffice using the official FreeBSD package repository? Or samba44 and KDE? If yes, then that sucks... -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jan 4 18:20:20 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 518B1C9FBD4 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 18:20:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dereks@lifeofadishwasher.com) Received: from mail-qt0-x233.google.com (mail-qt0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0ED011C09 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 18:20:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dereks@lifeofadishwasher.com) Received: by mail-qt0-x233.google.com with SMTP id v23so29764183qtb.0 for ; Wed, 04 Jan 2017 10:20:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lifeofadishwasher.com; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=L+lUILQgxM0h7VgOwpEqMOdYu60k3T6lwuqMuFtEnkw=; b=T8wvoOMt7s93+C06R5+e9vgHXtMU5FbIW7kB6RZ7RAfEr6Fewe+OJTpv48kKKm14Fo ANYxy/UGVV3RznSbwEEDk88xBbtmfDmFUVqRZUBeBjnL7Q2tBMewXe7wXeoJqQ/QrfT2 lz424N02IER675Obvf/HefgiE3F+xqEBzp/so= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-disposition :in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=L+lUILQgxM0h7VgOwpEqMOdYu60k3T6lwuqMuFtEnkw=; b=ELd8VNEMqcR7lUR9uV0gJr6Byga5bDOkoznCrdnEe9Y7R3F3flWOXsq/EtPzpo6giC UdlnFj9X+wwXE4uwfgmjuWvbffBG8lrmuCMon0Xh43tXEADekJITI64v2geNwU9TvSnv zSrKS5W2FLvhq68dBAcqtiNlo6bzBD2kuXy0JR+FRBCWyGq+3Iamy1guguovH0sFxoha LdvnAxNTZwNU/R606R/sqhz77F3dLTQLaGkDE+2Gy7oq+P12jfJJ8jujRNqZpJdeHysz NZnbc9rE13k1ETcNo13VvqOAX0dpB0qK+/MKsXss5vpTWhVaubJfw12UuLYBOLFDKvC+ OtgQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLnXE4kf9CRMjlIdK4J54omAQSLrw84XQNQYtZJI4D6F2m4jxD/HkHgbcBJxEgG6Q== X-Received: by 10.237.50.101 with SMTP id y92mr62375306qtd.179.1483554019139; Wed, 04 Jan 2017 10:20:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from lifeofadishwasher.com (c-24-131-227-67.hsd1.pa.comcast.net. [24.131.227.67]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w34sm46431425qtw.10.2017.01.04.10.20.17 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Jan 2017 10:20:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by lifeofadishwasher.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Wed, 04 Jan 2017 13:20:16 -0500 Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 13:20:16 -0500 From: Derek Schrock To: Andriy Gapon Cc: ports Subject: Re: openldap-client vs openldap-sasl-client Message-ID: <20170104182016.GA12747@ircbsd.lifeofadishwasher.com> Mail-Followup-To: Andriy Gapon , ports References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 18:20:20 -0000 On Wed, Jan 04, 2017 at 12:32:56PM EST, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > Do you I understand correctly that it is impossible now to install both samba44 > and libreoffice using the official FreeBSD package repository? > Or samba44 and KDE? > > If yes, then that sucks... > I believe this is being fix but for now yes you can't have openldap-sasl-client installed when something else needs openldap-client From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jan 4 21:21:16 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BC44C9F8B4 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 21:21:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 382881699 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 21:21:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 3785CC9F8B3; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 21:21:16 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3727FC9F8B2 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 21:21:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "vps1.elischer.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0614A1696; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 21:21:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from Julian-MBP3.local (ppp121-45-237-203.lns20.per1.internode.on.net [121.45.237.203]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v04LL9Rs063276 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 4 Jan 2017 13:21:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) To: "ports@FreeBSD.org" , Andriy Gapon From: Julian Elischer Subject: unable to reproduce previous pkg builds Message-ID: <5cd1f4fd-00b4-992a-51fd-e46a81695e0a@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 05:21:04 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 21:21:16 -0000 d'gay all. I've been stuggling for a few days trying to get a pkg of sysutils/tracker (1.6+) that I can apply to a 10.3 system. The version in the 10.3 pkg collection is 1.4 but the version in head at exactly the same time is 1.6.1. Most of the packages on our machine are generated from the head branch at rev 411747 which is where the head was when 10.3 was released. Luckily this revision number also gives me the version I need. It could also be taken from the 2016Q2 branch, but neither of those two compile. Or rather they never get to compile because poudriere trips up over other failures earlier. I have to presume that thes pkgs were actually compiled in hte past (in fact I KNOW some were becausewe wer eable to install one earlier in testing. My qustion is "if we are compiling on a standard 10,3 system under poedriere using head checked out (manually) to 4117474, or with -Bbranches/2016Q2 Am I right in expecting that as these probably compiled at the time, one should expect them to compile now. the eventual command run is sudo poudriere bulk -j freebsd_10-3x64 -p svn2016Q2 -f /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/port-list or sudo poudriere bulk -j freebsd_10-3x64 -p head-411747 -f /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/port-list where svn2016Q2 is controlled entirely by poudrier and head-411747 is checked out (from svn) manually at 411747 _*[00:10:47] ====>> [01][00:00:24] Finished build of misc/shared-mime-info: Failed: build*_ _*[00:13:11] ====>> [01][00:00:14] Finished build of textproc/gtk-doc: Failed: build*_ _*[00:13:49] ====>> [02][00:00:08] Finished build of devel/xdg-utils: Failed: build *_ _* *_Is there someone more familiar with poudriere and ports who can duplicate the failure and let me know if it is pilot error? these must have compiled some time... the surprising thing for me is that tracker, a package I had never heard of until recently forces a compile of 230 other packages! (hense the likelihood that one will fail). I also have tried head at 425747.. same issue. I must be doing something wrong... From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jan 4 22:59:22 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A6A7C9F04D for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 22:59:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pg0-x22a.google.com (mail-pg0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE6801C7F for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 22:59:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pg0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id i5so167380755pgh.2 for ; Wed, 04 Jan 2017 14:59:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=NWsdwMqIcTBdIgfUp8OEGI9Gzj/kNt8qCL+XFV8Q1WM=; b=O6OAhE5k/WZ8zuSMaiMzp3/LmX+TenWaaRrVm9WkGuhOGsXvWYYuHU20BKoZZFe0OD IEljhcMQ/Sb+OtPRnggP8BM9jKZABAxo8SwyBh8IZ7cZNSKTs9gySCZswku0H6TgxIGS L69tt+UZuUPFc1rUC97EL/pXeTOYBlESeUWdghX0YtcPv81pX+EzWWQ3Bc5BNYE6AF5F Wzf5EI6DclnZ6/Zm/kEHnz9sTDJ+9LE3GMiZdLG4C3iYqTldh4cNts+UbIsk6ZGSAp4C pBNj5WypanFX66UQRoSJeGl98fF3hFSyF1eCnJ8Ia6d4g/jVMwP/EX8OTAWkYKYBNyKH UUMg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=NWsdwMqIcTBdIgfUp8OEGI9Gzj/kNt8qCL+XFV8Q1WM=; b=c1GyVOKjOTfjrztU1aMsP1xbeMSy0WIlIIsQwEqvZ+3ivuZDi6gPKZ9J6RZh3kLSrG VlS5+DzL2VGWUgUWVV+Y9EJrXYmh2TOEbpZ32+cTKRZVzVDqaD39g+IVMKOg9j+LGh2A Bl5370g/7e/u8pKHAQoH1mv1bGseQcql/v+ueYfxG0THc/7uzOcbFsG6uvCZZ7U0vLFg JAS6wzXy8d8ziwjiTH63TIbP9VAGdj7VkYpxkbEDaPlUmVSwVKg7hardvw2Z6BMwWt+H TfuxJ7gvfiY7AYtR3XTbJv9p3mo25KApMgdjF943BaZ/DjRAjn1dCjo8k+a+GcTu8EB5 zS6g== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXLqiETGdAN/W1Ct2vtgsIF8of7PxGAHDUW1Hh8YfUOJcQcOrWoW9/e7tMmhAms02Q== X-Received: by 10.98.81.199 with SMTP id f190mr63353220pfb.180.1483570761071; Wed, 04 Jan 2017 14:59:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.206] (ppp59-167-111-196.static.internode.on.net. [59.167.111.196]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y15sm150502213pgc.43.2017.01.04.14.59.19 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 04 Jan 2017 14:59:19 -0800 (PST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Ports' tips and gotchas From: Ben Woods X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (14C92) In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 06:59:16 +0800 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-Id: <90D33B47-81F9-4C74-8D0B-76F75EC63BF1@gmail.com> References: <76519193d791325700c3beb34b8f447b@acheronmedia.com> To: "Vlad K." Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 22:59:22 -0000 Sent from my iPhone > On 4 Jan 2017, at 8:32 pm, Vlad K. wrote: > I have started a "proof of concept" section under my namespace, available h= ere: >=20 > https://wiki.freebsd.org/VladimirKrstulja/PortsTipsTricksAndGotchas Looks like a good start. A thought: should the wiki namespace follow the ports namespace, to avoid an= y ambiguity? So rather than: https://wiki.freebsd.org/VladimirKrstulja/PortsTipsTricksAndGotchas/Roundcub= e It should be: https://wiki.freebsd.org/VladimirKrstulja/PortsTipsTricksAndGotchas/mail/rou= ndcube The simplified version works great whilst there is only a few pages. But ima= gine if we have 1,000 pages some day, or even more. Thoughts? Cheers, Ben= From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Jan 4 23:38:05 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22FD3C9F97D for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 23:38:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from anoxia.adamw.org (anoxia.adamw.org [104.225.8.149]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "anoxia.adamw.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8CDF1DC6 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 23:38:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by anoxia.adamw.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id e4f2cb9c TLS version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO; Wed, 4 Jan 2017 16:38:03 -0700 (MST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\)) Subject: Re: Ports' tips and gotchas From: Adam Weinberger In-Reply-To: <90D33B47-81F9-4C74-8D0B-76F75EC63BF1@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2017 16:38:01 -0700 Cc: "Vlad K." , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <84717D48-C88A-4E09-A4BC-56B1DB0D73DB@adamw.org> References: <76519193d791325700c3beb34b8f447b@acheronmedia.com> <90D33B47-81F9-4C74-8D0B-76F75EC63BF1@gmail.com> To: Ben Woods X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 23:38:05 -0000 > On 4 Jan, 2017, at 15:59, Ben Woods wrote: >=20 > Sent from my iPhone >> On 4 Jan 2017, at 8:32 pm, Vlad K. = wrote: >> I have started a "proof of concept" section under my namespace, = available here: >>=20 >> https://wiki.freebsd.org/VladimirKrstulja/PortsTipsTricksAndGotchas >=20 > Looks like a good start. >=20 > A thought: should the wiki namespace follow the ports namespace, to = avoid any ambiguity? Yes. It absolutely should. # Adam --=20 Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jan 5 09:09:23 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76DD9CA0A28 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 09:09:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 645941D60 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 09:09:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 63C9ECA0A26; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 09:09:23 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 637BACA0A25 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 09:09:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (portscout.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56D181D5F for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 09:09:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v0599Nt9013595 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 09:09:23 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v0599Nsg013581; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 09:09:23 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201701050909.v0599Nsg013581@portscout.ysv.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.ysv.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 09:09:23 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 09:09:23 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ print/cups-pdf | 2.6.1 | 3.0.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jan 5 10:30:27 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D87CEC9FAF5 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 10:30:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crest@rlwinm.de) Received: from smtp.rlwinm.de (smtp.rlwinm.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:201:31ef::e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A64881ECF for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 10:30:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crest@rlwinm.de) Received: from crest.local (unknown [87.253.189.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.rlwinm.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7312B5DD3 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 11:30:25 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: openldap-client vs openldap-sasl-client To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: From: Jan Bramkamp Message-ID: <34b66662-a2d7-706d-3653-e0ffc9bf81b2@rlwinm.de> Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 11:30:24 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 10:30:27 -0000 On 04/01/2017 18:32, Andriy Gapon wrote: > > Do you I understand correctly that it is impossible now to install both samba44 > and libreoffice using the official FreeBSD package repository? > Or samba44 and KDE? > > If yes, then that sucks... Yes and yes it sucks. The "solution" is to build your own repo and set the right flags to always use the same LDAP client port. With binary packages and the speed of modern x86_64 systems I for one no longer see removing SASL support from OpenLDAP as useful enough to justify the complexity. Are there any reasons other than saved build time to disable this dependency (e.g. a bad security track record/process, different licenses)? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jan 5 10:34:36 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E5EAC9FD03 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 10:34:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from epinto@fishnet.ru) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C62E123B for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 10:34:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from epinto@fishnet.ru) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 68ACAC9FD02; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 10:34:36 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66AA7C9FD00 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 10:34:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from epinto@fishnet.ru) Received: from doublefresh.fishnet.ru (doublefresh.fishnet.ru [91.213.196.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 205D81239 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 10:34:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from epinto@fishnet.ru) Received: from [149.56.167.63] (unknown [149.56.167.63]) by doublefresh.fishnet.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7D04D4D31A for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 13:21:15 +0300 (MSK) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 doublefresh.fishnet.ru 7D04D4D31A DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=fishnet.ru; s=mail; t=1483611675; bh=7z9Y5OdbFHtu7UEujgbeUnYoEz+QJ1YWyiqQHiEeQbM=; h=Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To; b=Cx8+mOo5nS1b0vHWBAcEHBfQmRiGhqUIYvwA3lAKfWYAzWNeEx06bNw20dEQ9DjK0 rXFjXbLdPlemKjsbUJc8lIZvpD877aiNfTFb7m98dxkHWnKyoY9Gq2/Hm2s7J9eFyu o1kRs5Dmi/Izc/1Lc0M2jZ+V9V5k+DN1SdRwy7FM= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: Mail message body Subject: Private Placement Portfolio for ports@FreeBSD.org To: ports@FreeBSD.org From: "Mr. Ernest Pinto" Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 02:21:38 -0800 Reply-To: mr.ernestpinto@gmail.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 10:34:36 -0000 Good day, Welcome to our Private Placement Portfolio. I am a Staff of a Venture Capital Firm specializing in Growth Capital Inves= tments/Loans.We seek to invest in Projects with Public and Private sectors = in a broad range of areas including Real estate, Agriculture, Energy, Oil a= nd Gas, emerging markets and high-technology. Within the technology sector,= the firm focuses on communications, software, digital content and services. We have the capacity to invest a considerable amount of funds in any viable= project(s) that your company requires funding for on an investment capacit= y/Loan Application. Upon the review of your company's Project Business Plan= we shall determine on the project(s) possible funding. This will be form o= f a silent and Private Placement Investments. Endeavor to respond promptly if the investment proposal meets your company'= s approval. Kind Regards, Ernest Pinto From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jan 5 10:43:28 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 069CFC9E01B for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 10:43:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0C13168C for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 10:43:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1cP5W2-000JTX-Ss; Thu, 05 Jan 2017 11:43:26 +0100 Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 11:43:26 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Jan Bramkamp Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openldap-client vs openldap-sasl-client Message-ID: <20170105104326.GB2648@home.opsec.eu> References: <34b66662-a2d7-706d-3653-e0ffc9bf81b2@rlwinm.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <34b66662-a2d7-706d-3653-e0ffc9bf81b2@rlwinm.de> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 10:43:28 -0000 Hi! [openldap-client vs openldap-sasl-client and libreoffice etc] > Yes and yes it sucks. The "solution" is to build your own repo and set > the right flags to always use the same LDAP client port. With binary > packages and the speed of modern x86_64 systems I for one no longer see > removing SASL support from OpenLDAP as useful enough to justify the > complexity. The other question is: What's the use of SASL anyway ? I've seen it for years in mailserver setups, etc, and it always caused trouble. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 3 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jan 5 10:44:25 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0471BC9E090 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 10:44:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "vps1.elischer.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D77AA174C for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 10:44:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from Julian-MBP3.local (ppp121-45-237-203.lns20.per1.internode.on.net [121.45.237.203]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v05AiJb7066316 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 5 Jan 2017 02:44:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Subject: Re: openldap-client vs openldap-sasl-client To: Jan Bramkamp , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <34b66662-a2d7-706d-3653-e0ffc9bf81b2@rlwinm.de> From: Julian Elischer Message-ID: <4c8d3ad3-156d-e5a4-0051-9b6e590530ce@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 18:44:14 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <34b66662-a2d7-706d-3653-e0ffc9bf81b2@rlwinm.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 10:44:25 -0000 On 5/01/2017 6:30 PM, Jan Bramkamp wrote: > On 04/01/2017 18:32, Andriy Gapon wrote: >> >> Do you I understand correctly that it is impossible now to install >> both samba44 >> and libreoffice using the official FreeBSD package repository? >> Or samba44 and KDE? >> >> If yes, then that sucks... similar happened recently with the two jpeg libraries. They can't be installed at the same time but some packages wanted one and some the other. > > Yes and yes it sucks. The "solution" is to build your own repo and > set the right flags to always use the same LDAP client port. With > binary packages and the speed of modern x86_64 systems I for one no > longer see removing SASL support from OpenLDAP as useful enough to > justify the complexity. Are there any reasons other than saved build > time to disable this dependency (e.g. a bad security track > record/process, different licenses)? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jan 5 10:56:39 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 831C5C9E4E4 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 10:56:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from host64.shmhost.net (unknown [IPv6:2a01:4f8:a0:51d6::108:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3FBF51F15; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 10:56:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from franco@lastsummer.de) Received: from francos-mbp.homeoffice.local (ipservice-092-217-062-255.092.217.pools.vodafone-ip.de [92.217.62.255]) by host64.shmhost.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9189782832; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 11:56:33 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\)) Subject: Re: openldap-client vs openldap-sasl-client From: Franco Fichtner In-Reply-To: <4c8d3ad3-156d-e5a4-0051-9b6e590530ce@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 11:56:32 +0100 Cc: Jan Bramkamp , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <328213C1-307D-4813-9A5D-656BFA6F879A@lastsummer.de> References: <34b66662-a2d7-706d-3653-e0ffc9bf81b2@rlwinm.de> <4c8d3ad3-156d-e5a4-0051-9b6e590530ce@freebsd.org> To: Julian Elischer X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at host64.shmhost.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 10:56:39 -0000 > On 5 Jan 2017, at 11:44 AM, Julian Elischer = wrote: >=20 > On 5/01/2017 6:30 PM, Jan Bramkamp wrote: >> On 04/01/2017 18:32, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>>=20 >>> Do you I understand correctly that it is impossible now to install = both samba44 >>> and libreoffice using the official FreeBSD package repository? >>> Or samba44 and KDE? >>>=20 >>> If yes, then that sucks... >=20 > similar happened recently with the two jpeg libraries. > They can't be installed at the same time but some packages wanted one = and some the other. The OpenLDAP package state is a bit behind more modern ports framework approaches. Fixing the offending packages away from OpenLDAP is nice, but eventually the issues will reappear port for port, time after time. If we strive for default ports options that are sane for most users, globally setting WANT_OPENLDAP_SASL=3Dyes is the way to prevent that from happening again. There is probably a very valid historic reason for not having done so, but people can still build their own ports without SASL if they want and incompatibility issues are unlikely when the support is built in. At least we haven't seen anything in the past 6 months in OPNsense since we switched to avoid this in our build runs. And besides, having a package name flip-flop using arcane toggles should be removed as it breaks POLA. Long story short: make SASL an OPTION, add it to defaults, don't mess with the package name anymore? Cheers, Franco= From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jan 5 10:59:16 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C4BEC9E5EB for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 10:59:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crest@rlwinm.de) Received: from smtp.rlwinm.de (smtp.rlwinm.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:201:31ef::e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48C3E10CA for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 10:59:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crest@rlwinm.de) Received: from crest.local (unknown [87.253.189.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.rlwinm.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E34785DE0 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 11:59:14 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: openldap-client vs openldap-sasl-client To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <34b66662-a2d7-706d-3653-e0ffc9bf81b2@rlwinm.de> <20170105104326.GB2648@home.opsec.eu> From: Jan Bramkamp Message-ID: <32a0d218-9f1e-8e60-3d74-90f365dd36ad@rlwinm.de> Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 11:58:59 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170105104326.GB2648@home.opsec.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 10:59:16 -0000 On 05/01/2017 11:43, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > [openldap-client vs openldap-sasl-client and libreoffice etc] >> Yes and yes it sucks. The "solution" is to build your own repo and set >> the right flags to always use the same LDAP client port. With binary >> packages and the speed of modern x86_64 systems I for one no longer see >> removing SASL support from OpenLDAP as useful enough to justify the >> complexity. > > The other question is: What's the use of SASL anyway ? I've seen it > for years in mailserver setups, etc, and it always caused trouble. SASL is a authentication API. It allows an application to reuse the tested SASL protocol and code. SASL differs from PAM in that it allows its authentication mechanisms more possibilities as required to deal with X.509 client certificates and Kerberos tickets. Without SASL OpenLDAP is limited to password based authentication against passwords stored inside the LDAP database as plaintext or salted MD5/SHA1 hashes. With SASL you can the supported SASL mechanisms: * SASL external: Let the transport layer provide authentication. TLS protected connections can reuse the client certificate common name and map it to a LDAP object. Local connections over UNIX domain sockets can use the effective client user and primary group id to search for a matching user object inside the LDAP database. * SASL GSSAPI: Use Kerberos to authenticate against the LDAP service. Works great for interactive use if you already have Kerberos deployed. Can be used to centralize password storage in the Kerberos KDCs instead of the LDAP service while still supporting LDAP simple binds. In theory you could use a bunch of additional SASL mechs but these are the two I have encountered in everyday use. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jan 5 11:04:42 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7ECFC9EAAA for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 11:04:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:c4ea:bd49:619b:6cb3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B5491CBF for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 11:04:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com (unknown [85.199.232.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 04C919379 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 11:04:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/04C919379; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral Subject: Re: openldap-client vs openldap-sasl-client To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <34b66662-a2d7-706d-3653-e0ffc9bf81b2@rlwinm.de> <20170105104326.GB2648@home.opsec.eu> From: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 11:04:23 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170105104326.GB2648@home.opsec.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL, RDNS_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 11:04:42 -0000 On 01/05/17 10:43, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > [openldap-client vs openldap-sasl-client and libreoffice etc] >> Yes and yes it sucks. The "solution" is to build your own repo and set >> the right flags to always use the same LDAP client port. With binary >> packages and the speed of modern x86_64 systems I for one no longer see >> removing SASL support from OpenLDAP as useful enough to justify the >> complexity. > > The other question is: What's the use of SASL anyway ? I've seen it > for years in mailserver setups, etc, and it always caused trouble. > SASL effectively gets you a number of new authentication mechanisms. Most of these are ways of proving you know a secret without sending the actual secret (ie. password) over the net in plain text, but I think it also adds the ability to use client TLS certificates for authentication. IIRC. I don't see much value in the extra mechanisms for secure login over unencrypted links nowadays. Pretty much everything I'm using currently already requires TLS for good security reasons, so there's no real downside to using plain LOGIN over the encrypted channel. Plus the 'proof of knowledge' authentication mechanisms have a big downside: they need the secret stored in the LDAP database in plain text, or in some locally reversible encryption. With LOGIN over TLS, I can use salted password hashes in much the same way as Unix passwords. SASL would be worth it for TLS client certificate functionality, if that's the only way to enable that. Cheers, Matthew From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jan 5 11:22:31 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C1F9C9F853 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 11:22:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crest@rlwinm.de) Received: from smtp.rlwinm.de (smtp.rlwinm.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:201:31ef::e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 582601CD5 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 11:22:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crest@rlwinm.de) Received: from crest.local (unknown [87.253.189.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.rlwinm.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 529685DF3 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 12:22:22 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: openldap-client vs openldap-sasl-client To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <34b66662-a2d7-706d-3653-e0ffc9bf81b2@rlwinm.de> <20170105104326.GB2648@home.opsec.eu> From: Jan Bramkamp Message-ID: <5967fbad-7713-bdd8-4ca2-187bdfdcb965@rlwinm.de> Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 12:22:21 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 11:22:31 -0000 On 05/01/2017 12:04, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 01/05/17 10:43, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >> Hi! >> >> [openldap-client vs openldap-sasl-client and libreoffice etc] >>> Yes and yes it sucks. The "solution" is to build your own repo and set >>> the right flags to always use the same LDAP client port. With binary >>> packages and the speed of modern x86_64 systems I for one no longer see >>> removing SASL support from OpenLDAP as useful enough to justify the >>> complexity. >> >> The other question is: What's the use of SASL anyway ? I've seen it >> for years in mailserver setups, etc, and it always caused trouble. >> > > SASL effectively gets you a number of new authentication mechanisms. > Most of these are ways of proving you know a secret without sending the > actual secret (ie. password) over the net in plain text, but I think it > also adds the ability to use client TLS certificates for authentication. > IIRC. > > I don't see much value in the extra mechanisms for secure login over > unencrypted links nowadays. Pretty much everything I'm using currently > already requires TLS for good security reasons, so there's no real > downside to using plain LOGIN over the encrypted channel. Plus the > 'proof of knowledge' authentication mechanisms have a big downside: they > need the secret stored in the LDAP database in plain text, or in some > locally reversible encryption. With LOGIN over TLS, I can use salted > password hashes in much the same way as Unix passwords. > > SASL would be worth it for TLS client certificate functionality, if > that's the only way to enable that. SASL external is required by OpenLDAP to extract authentication data from TLS client certificates and not all SASL mechs require plaintext passwords inside the database to avoid leaking the credentials over the wire e.g. SASL SCRAM (RFC 5802). You can also use SASL to authenticate against PAM. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jan 5 11:29:30 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96C66C9FCD2 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 11:29:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crest@rlwinm.de) Received: from smtp.rlwinm.de (smtp.rlwinm.de [148.251.233.239]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61B0D15B4; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 11:29:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crest@rlwinm.de) Received: from crest.local (unknown [87.253.189.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.rlwinm.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DC8DE5DFA; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 12:29:27 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: openldap-client vs openldap-sasl-client To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, delphij@FreeBSD.org References: <34b66662-a2d7-706d-3653-e0ffc9bf81b2@rlwinm.de> <4c8d3ad3-156d-e5a4-0051-9b6e590530ce@freebsd.org> <328213C1-307D-4813-9A5D-656BFA6F879A@lastsummer.de> From: Jan Bramkamp Message-ID: <820c2d64-011a-7956-43d0-95dfb54b3cb2@rlwinm.de> Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 12:29:27 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <328213C1-307D-4813-9A5D-656BFA6F879A@lastsummer.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 11:29:30 -0000 On 05/01/2017 11:56, Franco Fichtner wrote: > >> On 5 Jan 2017, at 11:44 AM, Julian Elischer wrote: >> >> On 5/01/2017 6:30 PM, Jan Bramkamp wrote: >>> On 04/01/2017 18:32, Andriy Gapon wrote: >>>> >>>> Do you I understand correctly that it is impossible now to install both samba44 >>>> and libreoffice using the official FreeBSD package repository? >>>> Or samba44 and KDE? >>>> >>>> If yes, then that sucks... >> >> similar happened recently with the two jpeg libraries. >> They can't be installed at the same time but some packages wanted one and some the other. > > The OpenLDAP package state is a bit behind more modern ports framework > approaches. Fixing the offending packages away from OpenLDAP is nice, > but eventually the issues will reappear port for port, time after time. > > If we strive for default ports options that are sane for most users, > globally setting WANT_OPENLDAP_SASL=yes is the way to prevent that > from happening again. > > There is probably a very valid historic reason for not having done so, > but people can still build their own ports without SASL if they want and > incompatibility issues are unlikely when the support is built in. At > least we haven't seen anything in the past 6 months in OPNsense since we > switched to avoid this in our build runs. > > And besides, having a package name flip-flop using arcane toggles should > be removed as it breaks POLA. > > Long story short: make SASL an OPTION, add it to defaults, don't mess > with the package name anymore? That would be my prefered short term solution. Can we get some input from the ports maintainer? Maybe there is still a good reason for the current state of affairs. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jan 5 13:25:14 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2045CA0F85 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 13:25:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vlad-fbsd@acheronmedia.com) Received: from mail.irealone.com (xoth.irealone.hr [136.243.79.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 890291B73 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 13:25:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vlad-fbsd@acheronmedia.com) Received: by mail.irealone.com (Postfix, from userid 58) id 456B57938; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 14:25:05 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on postfix.xoth.irealone.hr X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, LOCAL_TO_FBSD_PORTS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from mail.irealone.com (unknown [10.0.0.10]) by mail.irealone.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E85577934 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 14:25:04 +0100 (CET) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 14:25:04 +0100 From: "Vlad K." To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports' tips and gotchas Organization: Acheron Media In-Reply-To: <90D33B47-81F9-4C74-8D0B-76F75EC63BF1@gmail.com> References: <76519193d791325700c3beb34b8f447b@acheronmedia.com> <90D33B47-81F9-4C74-8D0B-76F75EC63BF1@gmail.com> Message-ID: X-Sender: vlad-fbsd@acheronmedia.com User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 13:25:14 -0000 On 2017-01-04 23:59, Ben Woods wrote: > A thought: should the wiki namespace follow the ports namespace, to > avoid any ambiguity? Good advice, and it's a better way to organize them, yes. I did the changes, but there's now another problem and that's we can't have 1:1 mapping between wiki page and port. For example this Postgres tips page I have, it's basically for all postgresql servers in the tree, 92,93,94,95 and 96. So the page is /databases/postgresql which is not directly mapped. Meaning, there will be problems automating links between port origin and wiki page, but I guess we can cross that bridge when we get to it :) I'm not that familiar with moinmoin, maybe there's a way to specify aliases or something. -- Vlad K. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jan 5 13:35:08 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 279AFCA0471 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 13:35:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1234411E5 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 13:35:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 11884CA0470; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 13:35:08 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 112C8CA046F for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 13:35:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from land.berklix.org (land.berklix.org [144.76.10.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B534D11E4 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 13:35:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (pD9FE9BD1.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.254.155.209]) (authenticated bits=128) by land.berklix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPA id v05DZ0ri079722 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 13:35:01 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id v05DYvtd026823 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 14:34:57 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id v05DYjAj003862 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 14:34:57 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <201701051334.v05DYjAj003862@fire.js.berklix.net> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: ports/devel/noweb/Makefile FETCH_* is wrong, comment out works. From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.eu BSD Linux Unix Consultants, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://www.berklix.eu/free/ X-From: http://www.berklix.eu/~jhs/ Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 14:34:44 +0100 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 13:35:08 -0000 ports/devel/noweb/Makefile contains FETCH_CMD= /usr/bin/ftp FETCH_ARGS= # empty that is wrong, because if one already has the distfile on a local site (accessed via MASTER_SITE_OVERRIDE or MASTER_SITE_BACKUP ), it hangs & fails on make fetch. The patch below works for me, but we might need something better ? Note this comand runs fine on my gate: fetch ftp://www.eecs.harvard.edu/pub/nr/noweb-2.11b.tgz To see the generic failure that those FETCH above were hoping to solve, I ran (cd /usr/ports/distfiles; mv noweb-2.11b.tgz noweb-2.11b.tgz.MV) make MASTER_SITE_OVERRIDE= MASTER_SITE_BACKUP= fetch & saw: => noweb-2.11b.tgz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. => Attempting to fetch ftp://www.eecs.harvard.edu/pub/nr/noweb-2.11b.tgz Requesting ftp://www.eecs.harvard.edu/pub/nr/noweb-2.11b.tgz (via gate.js.berklix.net:21) ftp: Improper response from `gate.js.berklix.net:21' => Couldn't fetch it - please try to retrieve this => port manually into /usr/ports/distfiles/ and try again. *** Error code 1 Stop. (but, my ftp proxy doesnt work anyway, I use http proxy beyond my gate) *** 2017-01-05_12.0-CURRENT/ports/devel/noweb/Makefile Thu Jan 5 13:42:19 2017 --- new-generic/ports/devel/noweb/Makefile Thu Jan 5 13:48:41 2017 *************** *** 19,26 **** RUN_DEPENDS= iconx:lang/icon # Master site uses extended passive mode fetch(1) does not support ! FETCH_CMD= /usr/bin/ftp ! FETCH_ARGS= # empty DISABLE_SIZE= yes PORTSCOUT= skipv:2.11 --- 19,52 ---- RUN_DEPENDS= iconx:lang/icon # Master site uses extended passive mode fetch(1) does not support ! ! # Next 2 lines hashed out by jhs@berklix.com ! # FETCH_CMD= /usr/bin/ftp ! # FETCH_ARGS= # empty ! # As they produced this hang: ! # => noweb-2.11b.tgz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. ! # => Attempting to fetch file:///pub/FreeBSD/dists/current//noweb-2.11b.tgz ! # ftp: Can't open `/pub/FreeBSD/dists/current//noweb-2.11b.tgz': No such file or directory ! # => Attempting to fetch /pub/FreeBSD/dists/current//noweb-2.11b.tgz ! # ftp: Can't connect to `/pub/FreeBSD/dists/current//noweb-2.11b.tgz:': No such file or directory ! # ftp: Can't connect to `/pub/FreeBSD/dists/current//noweb-2.11b.tgz:ftp' ! # ftp> ! # Hashed out, it now fetches OK: ! # => Attempting to fetch file:///pub/FreeBSD/dists/current//noweb-2.11b.tgz ! # fetch: file:///pub/FreeBSD/dists/current//noweb-2.11b.tgz: No such file or directory ! # => Attempting to fetch /pub/FreeBSD/dists/current//noweb-2.11b.tgz ! # fetch: /pub/FreeBSD/dists/current//noweb-2.11b.tgz: No such file or directory ! # => Attempting to fetch ftp://ftp.js.berklix.net/pub/FreeBSD/dists/current//noweb-2.11b.tgz ! # resolving server address: ftp.js.berklix.net:21 ! # setting passive mode ! # opening data connection ! # initiating transfer ! # fetch: ftp://ftp.js.berklix.net/pub/FreeBSD/dists/current//noweb-2.11b.tgz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) ! # => Attempting to fetch file:///pub/FreeBSD/dists/11.0-RELEASE//noweb-2.11b.tgz ! # remote size / mtime: 738870 / 1150149960 ! # noweb-2.11b.tgz 100% of 721 kB 6339 kBps 00m00s ! # ===> Fetching all distfiles required by noweb-2.11b_1 for building ! DISABLE_SIZE= yes PORTSCOUT= skipv:2.11 ------------ Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix Sys Eng Consultant Munich Reply below, Prefix '> '. Plain text, No .doc, base64, HTML, quoted-printable. http://berklix.eu/brexit/#stolen_votes From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jan 5 14:17:22 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C34A3CA1F89 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 14:17:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A71211192 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 14:17:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A3775CA1F88; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 14:17:22 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3207CA1F87 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 14:17:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (mx3.absolight.net [IPv6:2a01:678:2:100::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42EF41190 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 14:17:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60147BDCAF; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 15:17:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from ogg.in.absolight.net (ogg.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.239]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3FE39BDC9B; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 15:17:20 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: ports/devel/noweb/Makefile FETCH_* is wrong, comment out works. To: "Julian H. Stacey" , ports@freebsd.org References: <201701051334.v05DYjAj003862@fire.js.berklix.net> From: Mathieu Arnold Organization: Absolight / The FreeBSD Foundation Message-ID: Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 15:17:18 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201701051334.v05DYjAj003862@fire.js.berklix.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OlhIXV1DiGlq1dCEecu9IveGpJTBcCo6s" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 14:17:22 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --OlhIXV1DiGlq1dCEecu9IveGpJTBcCo6s Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="95npiUFepM5pQXkT1NqmlD2AdL7GsX8e5"; protected-headers="v1" From: Mathieu Arnold To: "Julian H. Stacey" , ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: ports/devel/noweb/Makefile FETCH_* is wrong, comment out works. References: <201701051334.v05DYjAj003862@fire.js.berklix.net> In-Reply-To: <201701051334.v05DYjAj003862@fire.js.berklix.net> --95npiUFepM5pQXkT1NqmlD2AdL7GsX8e5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le 05/01/2017 =C3=A0 14:34, Julian H. Stacey a =C3=A9crit : > ports/devel/noweb/Makefile contains > FETCH_CMD=3D /usr/bin/ftp > FETCH_ARGS=3D # empty > that is wrong, because if one already has the distfile on a local site > (accessed via MASTER_SITE_OVERRIDE or MASTER_SITE_BACKUP ),=20 > it hangs & fails on make fetch. > This is true. But: $ fetch -v ftp://www.eecs.harvard.edu/pub/nr/noweb-2.11b.tgz looking up www.eecs.harvard.edu connecting to www.eecs.harvard.edu:21 setting passive mode opening data connection fetch: ftp://www.eecs.harvard.edu/pub/nr/noweb-2.11b.tgz: No route to hos= t And: $ ftp ftp://www.eecs.harvard.edu/pub/nr/noweb-2.11b.tgz Connected to www-aws.eecs.harvard.edu. 220- Anonymous access only (no uploads). For authenticated access, please use SCP, SFTP, or FTP over SSH. Thank you, . 220 FTP Server ready. 331 Anonymous login ok, send your complete email address as your password= 230 Anonymous login ok, restrictions apply. Remote system type is UNIX. Using binary mode to transfer files. 200 Type set to I 250 CWD command successful 250 CWD command successful local: noweb-2.11b.tgz remote: noweb-2.11b.tgz 229 Entering Extended Passive Mode (|||65306|) 150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for noweb-2.11b.tgz (738870 bytes= ) 100% |************************************************************************= *************************************************************************= *****************************************************************| =20 721 KiB 599.13 KiB/s 00:00 ETA226 Transfer complete 738870 bytes received in 00:01 (554.01 KiB/s) 221 Goodbye. $ The port MUST be able to fetch from its MASTER_SITE, and I am talking about the one in the Makefile, not what gets added/changed by the framework. Otherwise, the backup master site, or the place where you have a local cache cannot be filled with something in the first place. In the future, when fetch(1) manages to fetch from that ftp site on all our supported releases, feel free to patch the Makefile. Regards, --=20 Mathieu Arnold --95npiUFepM5pQXkT1NqmlD2AdL7GsX8e5-- --OlhIXV1DiGlq1dCEecu9IveGpJTBcCo6s Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJYblVvXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQzQUI2OTc4OUQyRUQxMjEwNjQ0MEJBNUIz QTQ1MTZGMzUxODNDRTQ4AAoJEDpFFvNRg85I4kMP/jn3bb/mZwePLVJ6FNk5KGov BfRB5jbkEVD/dF6Y9gyIYk+5/B9oybgc9o6sPXs7jlTrc/jImfiv94tRycCdiLnp 4hB9U+YtH987QY+di0VdHKfcDhdxoARXeqKwdd8kWvclY1K76efqb4514MmaKrJC nsiCwUdBDGKLcD9PuGHhopMr6lKRPq51kQO6TpG8G3ktv5SAU6M76AOVp3nYemnY f06hLDL2TrvAxcnFnjgdTcIFj+5aYUDjB4gFCfisJLR7qnxY9AR7f3TiP14HSpdx J49bhF0tXVTr4uNpyEv4NRQeuqmL369czHPuFli8jIziZC1Xmt6L+4NI4orqP9K5 Klg380inZjp3NSdnlMYcj7aC3ok2cA7wb6N7uKpXnY000XErXOFu3+jaWKergymg JVo5bz851wnLWU0wrtLmWi3D/T8XUKUtQQITsonBAVYJ0Bqy7I+9ExiX8YuNKhwE nZzaetOlSOZvjAfpB1iG424dthXqXTYbH2ErxY3AX2Ho+Psz3S52y7AHDSi9X96/ OvQ5eDpcND3pusvvOzABfAxITeEwtzwE0XQ0uG6IuwVqf7cWCa7nM9MhVw84fQoA vLAHu+ibR996/5NseVKNwV4nU3xGs2y6lYX2Qb+MdNXFTLg+rjX8p32HpURTxjvR CA3DS47gjW5xVH+10Ujv =nfQJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OlhIXV1DiGlq1dCEecu9IveGpJTBcCo6s-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jan 5 14:43:58 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE1E2CA0BC3 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 14:43:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98277120C for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 14:43:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 9761FCA0BC2; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 14:43:58 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97032CA0BBF for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 14:43:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from land.berklix.org (land.berklix.org [144.76.10.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D404120B; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 14:43:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (pD9FE9BD1.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.254.155.209]) (authenticated bits=128) by land.berklix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPA id v05Ehuff083553; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 14:43:57 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id v05EhrNj027196; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 15:43:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id v05Ehfka097992; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 15:43:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <201701051443.v05Ehfka097992@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Mathieu Arnold cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/devel/noweb/Makefile FETCH_* is wrong, comment out works. From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.eu BSD Unix Linux Consultants, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.eu/free/ X-From: http://www.berklix.eu/~jhs/ In-reply-to: Your message "Thu, 05 Jan 2017 15:17:18 +0100." Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 15:43:41 +0100 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 14:43:58 -0000 Mathieu Arnold wrote: > This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) > --OlhIXV1DiGlq1dCEecu9IveGpJTBcCo6s > Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="95npiUFepM5pQXkT1NqmlD2AdL7GsX8e5"; > protected-headers="v1" > From: Mathieu Arnold > To: "Julian H. Stacey" , ports@freebsd.org > Message-ID: > Subject: Re: ports/devel/noweb/Makefile FETCH_* is wrong, comment out works. > References: <201701051334.v05DYjAj003862@fire.js.berklix.net> > In-Reply-To: <201701051334.v05DYjAj003862@fire.js.berklix.net> > > --95npiUFepM5pQXkT1NqmlD2AdL7GsX8e5 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Le 05/01/2017 =C3=A0 14:34, Julian H. Stacey a =C3=A9crit : > > ports/devel/noweb/Makefile contains > > FETCH_CMD=3D /usr/bin/ftp > > FETCH_ARGS=3D # empty > > that is wrong, because if one already has the distfile on a local site > > (accessed via MASTER_SITE_OVERRIDE or MASTER_SITE_BACKUP ),=20 > > it hangs & fails on make fetch. > > > > This is true. But: > > $ fetch -v ftp://www.eecs.harvard.edu/pub/nr/noweb-2.11b.tgz > looking up www.eecs.harvard.edu > connecting to www.eecs.harvard.edu:21 > setting passive mode > opening data connection > fetch: ftp://www.eecs.harvard.edu/pub/nr/noweb-2.11b.tgz: No route to hos= > t On 3 boxes direct connected to internet: 6.4-RELEASE SUCCESS fetch -v ftp://www.eecs.harvard.edu/pub/nr/noweb-2.11b.tgz looking up www.eecs.harvard.edu connecting to www.eecs.harvard.edu:21 binding data socket initiating transfer remote size / mtime: 738870 / 1150149960 noweb-2.11b.tgz 100% of 721 kB 288 kBps 10.3-p4 FAIL fetch -v ftp://www.eecs.harvard.edu/pub/nr/noweb-2.11b.tgz looking up www.eecs.harvard.edu connecting to www.eecs.harvard.edu:21 setting passive mode opening data connection fetch: ftp://www.eecs.harvard.edu/pub/nr/noweb-2.11b.tgz: Operation timed out source `which unsetenv.csh`;printenv PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/bin TERM=xterm fetch -v ftp://www.eecs.harvard.edu/pub/nr/noweb-2.11b.tgz looking up www.eecs.harvard.edu connecting to www.eecs.harvard.edu:21 setting passive mode opening data connection fetch: ftp://www.eecs.harvard.edu/pub/nr/noweb-2.11b.tgz: Operation timed out 10.3-STABLE FAIL fetch -v ftp://www.eecs.harvard.edu/pub/nr/noweb-2.11b.tgz looking up www.eecs.harvard.edu connecting to www.eecs.harvard.edu:21 setting passive mode opening data connection fetch: ftp://www.eecs.harvard.edu/pub/nr/noweb-2.11b.tgz: No route to host source `which unsetenv.csh`;printenv PATH=/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/games:/usr/local/bin TERM=xterm fetch -v ftp://www.eecs.harvard.edu/pub/nr/noweb-2.11b.tgz looking up www.eecs.harvard.edu connecting to www.eecs.harvard.edu:21 setting passive mode opening data connection fetch: ftp://www.eecs.harvard.edu/pub/nr/noweb-2.11b.tgz: No route to host > > And: > > $ ftp ftp://www.eecs.harvard.edu/pub/nr/noweb-2.11b.tgz > Connected to www-aws.eecs.harvard.edu. > 220- > Anonymous access only (no uploads). > For authenticated access, please use SCP, SFTP, or FTP over SSH. > Thank you, . > 220 FTP Server ready. > 331 Anonymous login ok, send your complete email address as your password= > > 230 Anonymous login ok, restrictions apply. > Remote system type is UNIX. > Using binary mode to transfer files. > 200 Type set to I > 250 CWD command successful > 250 CWD command successful > local: noweb-2.11b.tgz remote: noweb-2.11b.tgz > 229 Entering Extended Passive Mode (|||65306|) > 150 Opening BINARY mode data connection for noweb-2.11b.tgz (738870 bytes= > ) > 100% > |************************************************************************= > *************************************************************************= > *****************************************************************| =20 > 721 KiB 599.13 KiB/s 00:00 ETA226 Transfer complete > 738870 bytes received in 00:01 (554.01 KiB/s) > 221 Goodbye. > $ > > The port MUST be able to fetch from its MASTER_SITE, and I am talking > about the one in the Makefile, not what gets added/changed by the > framework. Otherwise, the backup master site, or the place where you > have a local cache cannot be filled with something in the first place. Yes, agreed > In the future, when fetch(1) manages to fetch from that ftp site on all > our supported releases, feel free to patch the Makefile. This looks like a regression failure with fetch as 6.4 fetch works fine. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix Sys Eng Consultant Munich Reply below, Prefix '> '. Plain text, No .doc, base64, HTML, quoted-printable. http://berklix.eu/brexit/#stolen_votes From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jan 5 15:03:22 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BE0BC9F096 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 15:03:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 200281BFD for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 15:03:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 1F665C9F095; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 15:03:22 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EEA5C9F094 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 15:03:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (prod2.absolight.net [79.143.243.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8C491BFC for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 15:03:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCD07BDCAC; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 16:03:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from ogg.in.absolight.net (ogg.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.239]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B149CBDC9B; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 16:03:18 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: ports/devel/noweb/Makefile FETCH_* is wrong, comment out works. To: "Julian H. Stacey" References: <201701051443.v05Ehfka097992@fire.js.berklix.net> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org From: Mathieu Arnold Organization: Absolight / The FreeBSD Foundation Message-ID: <3cf24719-de41-92fe-a37c-12149d93e639@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 16:03:17 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201701051443.v05Ehfka097992@fire.js.berklix.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RxP9PkeN38X7fosu2U5orM2MCGR2KKvur" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 15:03:22 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --RxP9PkeN38X7fosu2U5orM2MCGR2KKvur Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="gaRtNiWMO7FMO0KcGfOJeEdCM4BR8HecR"; protected-headers="v1" From: Mathieu Arnold To: "Julian H. Stacey" Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <3cf24719-de41-92fe-a37c-12149d93e639@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: ports/devel/noweb/Makefile FETCH_* is wrong, comment out works. References: <201701051443.v05Ehfka097992@fire.js.berklix.net> In-Reply-To: <201701051443.v05Ehfka097992@fire.js.berklix.net> --gaRtNiWMO7FMO0KcGfOJeEdCM4BR8HecR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le 05/01/2017 =C3=A0 15:43, Julian H. Stacey a =C3=A9crit : > This looks like a regression failure with fetch as 6.4 fetch works fine= =2E=20 Do feel free to open a PR about the regression :-) --=20 Mathieu Arnold --gaRtNiWMO7FMO0KcGfOJeEdCM4BR8HecR-- --RxP9PkeN38X7fosu2U5orM2MCGR2KKvur Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJYbmA2XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQzQUI2OTc4OUQyRUQxMjEwNjQ0MEJBNUIz QTQ1MTZGMzUxODNDRTQ4AAoJEDpFFvNRg85I0MwP/iOYTxZ29tNvuZp88Ap3cXgO ulPfPvd3GwBIyx6d3yRbMt3+dVzufDGcl+Qu8vexpAbzta0R619+B7K8O4BZkH9c MKmTYP5nJI/gf0iPc6ZSMaYTim8OCgbGlBGLYEEseW0lV7w4oA5A+q5p2ouC2ZvU V21o+CExzLx7ouNAw5aiCboCMicyZ8GfgLBzOYqbdJgOlcJlajlMuQtSKUvSEVVl 9fyDhgiGYwJNrlxLW69aSWmPbQFRhwDhXOblWSoIO3M7zOse0uxTSa+aB2FValMO 2/geslZ8F9yYca/JaDza0/XIeb0XI3cDg+f1k/Vqcu2m9pTGex+lNppg4cpiAvCT d3PNmHHWnY7FirO1sVC6DwlG2QCCsaUxRbpwq2jTOBRkiGm5br2/VjyP+shakQNh CAOo16vOWnVaFAbIr0eOFXFMxeaZQEOmUGc03YAiDWP7PUa6BAZg+XxS3FL3HoYL TBgQYMfKbCDdVJyXttvogpqy7vKqWNmGgrNJjngD48JSosrzFGuHVu0ra1gDa1B1 Rdb0VcqMMz3TY/vs2IgB6jyKBoXXGCs2El1fWzkiFWCRD3Mvsvsw1sWIVK4Snetq Jh2XzDhPldxKHtBOJG9tSbcgzEnDNAOEwp+qCzv8MGNttRdltkj8ZGIeEfyUgweL r+AjWZNW1qrVkB4CKFBh =nq4Y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --RxP9PkeN38X7fosu2U5orM2MCGR2KKvur-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jan 5 19:13:02 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8E15CA1E3E for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 19:13:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from msa1.earth.yoonka.com (yoonka.com [185.24.122.233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "msa1.earth.yoonka.com", Issuer "msa1.earth.yoonka.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BBA51957 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 19:13:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) Received: from ultrabook.yoonka.com (ip-109-84-2-87.web.vodafone.de [109.84.2.87]) (authenticated bits=0) by msa1.earth.yoonka.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v05JCrDX032608 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 19:12:54 GMT (envelope-from list1@gjunka.com) X-Authentication-Warning: msa1.earth.yoonka.com: Host ip-109-84-2-87.web.vodafone.de [109.84.2.87] claimed to be ultrabook.yoonka.com Subject: Re: Wine & PlayOnBSD To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <88ccc43a-d28e-588b-9d3f-01fb3a1c85b9@gjunka.com> <58693C2B.7040806@abinet.ru> From: Grzegorz Junka Message-ID: <2e9002fb-c8e5-251d-3c41-452cdcb98f8a@gjunka.com> Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2017 19:12:48 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <58693C2B.7040806@abinet.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 19:13:02 -0000 On 01/01/2017 17:28, abi wrote: > > On 01.01.2017 18:28, Grzegorz Junka wrote: >> I am using FreeBSD 10.3 x64. I understand that to run Windows >> applications on that configuration I can use only one of the following: >> >> 1. playonbsd-4.2.10_1 >> 2. wine-staging-2.0.r3_1,1 >> 3. i386-wine-staging-2.0.r3_1,1 >> 4. wine-devel-2.0.r3_1,1 >> 5. i386-wine-devel-2.0.r3_1,1 >> 6. wine-1.8.6,1 >> 7. i386-wine-1.8.6,1 >> >> Currently I have installed playonbsd, which is good but it seems that >> not all applications I would like to install can be installed on it. >> >> Which one of those options would give me the most compatibility with >> office-type and multimedia applications (e.g. DVD player, SoftPhone, >> applications that access USB), not necessarily games? >> >> Should I prefer some of these ports over others for my x64 system? >> >> When switching from one port to another (e.g. wine to playonbsd) can >> I keep the currently installed Windows applications or I would need >> to reinstall any of the applications/libraries installed on the >> previous version? >> >> It seems that front-end ports (q4wine, swine) default to 4. from the >> list (wine-devel-2.0.r3_1,1). Is there any reason for that? Can they >> run without problems on a x64 system? >> >> Many thanks for any insights. > > Probably you need i386-wine-devel and emulators/winetricks > playonbsd is a wrapper for wine. No need to use it at all, just get > installer for you program, create new wineprefix and install software > into it > > Personally, I make 1 wineprefix for 1 program (or program group ) with > env WINEPREFIX=$HOME/.local/share/wineprefixes/ck2 wineboot > sandbox it with winetricks if needed > copy installer into $HOME/.local/share/wineprefixes/ck2/drive_c/Distr > env WINEPREFIX=$HOME/.local/share/wineprefixes/ck2 wine cmd > navigate to Distr and run installer > > ck2 is example prefix for crusader kings II. I love Paradox games :P > Thank you for the tips. Any reason why I shouldn't be using the x64 versions? And also, wasn't playonbsd designed to give a greater compatibility with Windows applications? What benefit is it to use playonbsd over normal wine with winetricks then? I mean, why is it in ports? Greg From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Jan 5 21:28:26 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 158D3CA0DC3 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 21:28:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abi@abinet.ru) Received: from mail.abinet.ru (mail.abinet.ru [136.243.72.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A018C112A for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 21:28:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abi@abinet.ru) Received: from [10.0.1.1] (unknown [10.0.1.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.abinet.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 48ABB353C7 for ; Thu, 5 Jan 2017 21:28:17 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=abinet.ru; s=dkim; t=1483651697; bh=M06ovVkG/mY3azi4/zWWh07+WFQNkgYOjO05xA0Zdjc=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=acVe6nkvW8bk/OiAkvkgpA8u+FEuL7M+i3DX8njM/mWfuoTwwAY2RlIPN2fTy9PPt B0H2vrrDZ/bY8dFTzSY2Ah0E6sc9CTgl1vq+HVHa5LHCfWhvP8I1RfMr9vlywadqmW 2bl7xXF6kBwAmQmkDsD4a2jr9SPcudriaZvyl+Bw= Message-ID: <586EBAB6.10203@abinet.ru> Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 00:29:26 +0300 From: abi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:25.8) Gecko/20151117 FossaMail/25.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wine & PlayOnBSD References: <88ccc43a-d28e-588b-9d3f-01fb3a1c85b9@gjunka.com> <58693C2B.7040806@abinet.ru> <2e9002fb-c8e5-251d-3c41-452cdcb98f8a@gjunka.com> In-Reply-To: <2e9002fb-c8e5-251d-3c41-452cdcb98f8a@gjunka.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jan 2017 21:28:26 -0000 On 05.01.2017 22:12, Grzegorz Junka wrote: > > On 01/01/2017 17:28, abi wrote: >> >> On 01.01.2017 18:28, Grzegorz Junka wrote: >>> I am using FreeBSD 10.3 x64. I understand that to run Windows >>> applications on that configuration I can use only one of the following: >>> >>> 1. playonbsd-4.2.10_1 >>> 2. wine-staging-2.0.r3_1,1 >>> 3. i386-wine-staging-2.0.r3_1,1 >>> 4. wine-devel-2.0.r3_1,1 >>> 5. i386-wine-devel-2.0.r3_1,1 >>> 6. wine-1.8.6,1 >>> 7. i386-wine-1.8.6,1 >>> >>> Currently I have installed playonbsd, which is good but it seems >>> that not all applications I would like to install can be installed >>> on it. >>> >>> Which one of those options would give me the most compatibility with >>> office-type and multimedia applications (e.g. DVD player, SoftPhone, >>> applications that access USB), not necessarily games? >>> >>> Should I prefer some of these ports over others for my x64 system? >>> >>> When switching from one port to another (e.g. wine to playonbsd) can >>> I keep the currently installed Windows applications or I would need >>> to reinstall any of the applications/libraries installed on the >>> previous version? >>> >>> It seems that front-end ports (q4wine, swine) default to 4. from the >>> list (wine-devel-2.0.r3_1,1). Is there any reason for that? Can they >>> run without problems on a x64 system? >>> >>> Many thanks for any insights. >> >> Probably you need i386-wine-devel and emulators/winetricks >> playonbsd is a wrapper for wine. No need to use it at all, just get >> installer for you program, create new wineprefix and install software >> into it >> >> Personally, I make 1 wineprefix for 1 program (or program group ) with >> env WINEPREFIX=$HOME/.local/share/wineprefixes/ck2 wineboot >> sandbox it with winetricks if needed >> copy installer into $HOME/.local/share/wineprefixes/ck2/drive_c/Distr >> env WINEPREFIX=$HOME/.local/share/wineprefixes/ck2 wine cmd >> navigate to Distr and run installer >> >> ck2 is example prefix for crusader kings II. I love Paradox games :P >> > > Thank you for the tips. Any reason why I shouldn't be using the x64 > versions? And also, wasn't playonbsd designed to give a greater > compatibility with Windows applications? What benefit is it to use > playonbsd over normal wine with winetricks then? I mean, why is it in > ports? x64 version lacks WoW subsystem, so it can't execute 32-bit programs at all. playonbsd can't give greater compatibility as it's wrapper for wine. It can set compatibility options or install common software, however you can find your program in wine database and look for recipes yourself. I doubt playonbsd tracks wine precisely, wine changes too fast, so probably not all recipes are up to date and it's not very complex to do all steps manually after all. Why it's in port is a rhetoric question, ports are user driven. Maybe someone like it or maybe maintainer is a developer. I dunno, but ability to choose is always for good. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jan 6 00:13:36 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BDF1C9F07E for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 00:13:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2595E100C for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 00:13:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 21A74C9F07D; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 00:13:36 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 214DEC9F07B for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 00:13:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from land.berklix.org (land.berklix.org [144.76.10.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4C80100B; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 00:13:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (pD9FE9BD1.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.254.155.209]) (authenticated bits=128) by land.berklix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPA id v060DYPA013336; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 00:13:34 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id v060DVZG029234; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 01:13:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id v060DJZ7046035; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 01:13:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <201701060013.v060DJZ7046035@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Mathieu Arnold cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/devel/noweb/Makefile FETCH_* is wrong, comment out works. From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.eu BSD Unix Linux Consultants, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.eu/free/ X-From: http://www.berklix.eu/~jhs/ In-reply-to: Your message "Thu, 05 Jan 2017 16:03:17 +0100." <3cf24719-de41-92fe-a37c-12149d93e639@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 01:13:19 +0100 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 00:13:36 -0000 Hi Mathieu & ports@ Mathieu Arnold wrote: > This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) > --RxP9PkeN38X7fosu2U5orM2MCGR2KKvur > Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="gaRtNiWMO7FMO0KcGfOJeEdCM4BR8HecR"; > protected-headers="v1" > From: Mathieu Arnold > To: "Julian H. Stacey" > Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org > Message-ID: <3cf24719-de41-92fe-a37c-12149d93e639@FreeBSD.org> > Subject: Re: ports/devel/noweb/Makefile FETCH_* is wrong, comment out works. > References: <201701051443.v05Ehfka097992@fire.js.berklix.net> > In-Reply-To: <201701051443.v05Ehfka097992@fire.js.berklix.net> > > --gaRtNiWMO7FMO0KcGfOJeEdCM4BR8HecR > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > Le 05/01/2017 =C3=A0 15:43, Julian H. Stacey a =C3=A9crit : > > This looks like a regression failure with fetch as 6.4 fetch works fine= > =2E=20 > > Do feel free to open a PR about the regression :-) Thanks, Will do, (Looking for info for a PR), it looks current fetch.c runs OK on my 6.4 box, so maybe its a problem in current /usr/lib/libfetch.so So far I did: uname -a FreeBSD lapr.js.berklix.net 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #12801: Mon Dec 26 22:34:09 CET 2016 jhs@lapr.js.berklix.net:/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/LAPR.small amd64 cd /usr/src cat .ctm_status # src-cur 12814 cat .svn_revision # 311243 copied 12.0-CURRENT /usr/src/usr.bin/fetch/fetch.c to 6.4 box uname -a FreeBSD mart.js.berklix.net 6.4-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.4-RELEASE #0: Tue Dec 10 05:20:18 CET 2013 jhs@mart.js.berklix.net:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/MART.small i386 cd /usr/src/usr.bin/fetch l -rw-r--r-- 1 jhs staff 23453 Oct 2 2008 fetch.c mv ~/fetch.c fetch-current.c md5 fetch-current.c mv fetch.c fetch-6.4.c ln fetch-current.c fetch.c which fetch /usr/bin/fetch mv /usr/bin/fetch /usr/bin/fetch-6.4 make fetch.c: In function `fetch': fetch.c:483: error: structure has no member named `ims_time' Inspect current /usr/include/fetch.h struct url has extra element time_t ims_time; Append line into base of struct url on 6.4 /usr/include/fetch.h make cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -march=i586 -pipe -std=iso9899:199Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstriprototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type -Wcast-qual -Wwe-strings -Wswitch -Wshadow -Wcast-align -Wunused-parameter -Wchar-subscriptsinline -Wnested-externs -Wredundant-decls -c fetch.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -march=i586 -pipe -std=iso9899:199Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstriprototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer-arith -Wreturn-type -Wcast-qual -Wwe-strings -Wswitch -Wshadow -Wcast-align -Wunused-parameter -Wchar-subscriptsinline -Wnested-externs -Wredundant-decls -o fetch fetch.o -lfetch -lssl -lcto gzip -cn fetch.1 > fetch.1.gz make install install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 fetch /usr/bin install -o root -g wheel -m 444 fetch.1.gz /usr/share/man/man1 pushd /tmp fetch -v ftp://www.eecs.harvard.edu/pub/nr/noweb-2.11bz looking up www.eecs.harvard.edu connecting to www.eecs.harvard.edu:21 binding data socket initiating transfer remote size / mtime: 738870 / 1150149960 noweb-2.11b.tgz 100% of 721 kB 155 kBps 00m05 which fetch /usr/bin/fetch l /usr/bin/fetch* -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 21264 Jan 6 00:23 /usr/bin/fetch* -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 18388 Aug 29 2013 /usr/bin/fetch-6.4* Current /usr/src/lib/libfetch to 6.4: cd /usr/src/lib/libfetch/.. mv libfetch libfetch-6.4 mkdir libfetch-current ln -s libfetch-current libfetch cd libfetch; tar xf ~/t make clean "Makefile", line 3: Could not find src.opts.mk "Makefile", line 14: Malformed conditional (${MK_INET6_SUPPORT} != "no") "Makefile", line 16: if-less endif "Makefile", line 18: Malformed conditional (${MK_OPENSSL} != "no") "Makefile", line 21: if-less else "Makefile", line 23: if-less endif make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue mv Makefile Makefile.orig; cp Makefile.orig Makefile diff -c Makefile.orig Makefile > /tmp/t ------ *** Makefile.orig Fri Dec 23 13:03:49 2016 --- Makefile Fri Jan 6 01:00:32 2017 *************** *** 1,6 **** # $FreeBSD: head/lib/libfetch/Makefile 298107 2016-04-16 07:45:30Z gjb $ ! .include PACKAGE=lib${LIB} LIB= fetch --- 1,6 ---- # $FreeBSD: head/lib/libfetch/Makefile 298107 2016-04-16 07:45:30Z gjb $ ! # .include PACKAGE=lib${LIB} LIB= fetch *************** *** 11,20 **** --- 11,22 ---- MAN= fetch.3 CLEANFILES= ftperr.h httperr.h + MK_INET6_SUPPORT="no" .if ${MK_INET6_SUPPORT} != "no" CFLAGS+= -DINET6 .endif + MK_OPENSSL="no" # not sure if no or yes appropriate ? .if ${MK_OPENSSL} != "no" CFLAGS+= -DWITH_SSL LIBADD+= ssl crypto ------ cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -march=i586 -pipe -I. -DINET6 -DWITH_SSL -DFTP_COMBINE_CWDS -std=iso9899:1999 -c fetch.c cc -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -march=i586 -pipe -I. -DINET6 -DWITH_SSL -DFTP_COMBINE_CWDS -std=iso9899:1999 -c common.c common.c: In function `fetch_ssl_setup_transport_layer': common.c:748: error: `SSL_OP_NO_TICKET' undeclared (first use in this function) common.c:748: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once common.c:748: error: for each function it appears in.) common.c:754: error: `SSL_OP_NO_TLSv1_1' undeclared (first use in this function) common.c:756: error: `SSL_OP_NO_TLSv1_2' undeclared (first use in this function) common.c: In function `fetch_ssl': common.c:906: warning: passing arg 1 of `SSL_CTX_new' discards qualifiers from pointer target type *** Error code 1 I dont know which of the plethora of different SSL etc I should define for back on 6.4. I need to hand over to a libfetch enthusiast I will wait overnight while this hits the ports/ archive then file a PR tomorrow. Summary: seems to be regression between 6.4 & current /usr/src/lib/libfetch Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix Sys Eng Consultant Munich Reply below, Prefix '> '. Plain text, No .doc, base64, HTML, quoted-printable. http://berklix.eu/brexit/#stolen_votes From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jan 6 08:40:31 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85901B87F08 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 08:40:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72E181E2C for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 08:40:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 72357B87F06; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 08:40:31 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71DB1B87F05 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 08:40:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "vps1.elischer.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E4371E2B for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 08:40:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from Julian-MBP3.local (ppp121-45-237-203.lns20.per1.internode.on.net [121.45.237.203]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v068eQLw071250 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 00:40:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) To: "ports@FreeBSD.org" From: Julian Elischer Subject: using ports for things they were never meant to do Message-ID: <73d145f2-10e4-17f6-07e6-a2bde375f87e@freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 16:40:20 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 08:40:31 -0000 So this seems to be a speciality of mine. I often find that I need a ports tree at rev X except for some port foo/bar that needs to be at some different rev (Y) to pick up a fix/change needed by the application. Now there is no reason that I can't just edit the distinfo file and the Makefile and replace X with Y, and that nearly always works if X and Y are not too different. I'd prefer however to be able to upgrade the Makefile to the right level, but that then hits the problem that he Makefile is using an API with the rest of the ports system, that is rapidly changing. SO you have much more chance of your build failing because of Makefile changes than due to incompatibilities in the distfiles. My personal way of handing that would be to break the pkg rev out to a separate file with nothing but PORTVERSION and PORTREVISION in it so that the version of the distfile being fetched is divorced from the ports API. Then in my tree I update distinfo and the new Portrev and leave the Makefile alone. Does anyone else have a better way to slide a particular port back or ahead compared to the rest of the tree? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jan 6 13:57:19 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 611BECA28A8 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 13:57:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michelle@sorbs.net) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FA64183B for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 13:57:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michelle@sorbs.net) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 4BF45CA28A7; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 13:57:19 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B995CA28A6 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 13:57:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michelle@sorbs.net) Received: from hades.sorbs.net (mail.sorbs.net [67.231.146.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F2A3183A; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 13:57:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michelle@sorbs.net) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed Received: from C02LJ0HMFFT4.corp.proofpoint.com (static.belong.com.au [141.168.241.229]) by hades.sorbs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.29.0 64bit (built Jul 9 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0OJD0026K0CWJA00@hades.sorbs.net>; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 05:05:22 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: using ports for things they were never meant to do To: Julian Elischer , "ports@FreeBSD.org" References: <73d145f2-10e4-17f6-07e6-a2bde375f87e@freebsd.org> From: Michelle Sullivan Message-id: Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 23:56:50 +1100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/49.0 SeaMonkey/2.46 In-reply-to: <73d145f2-10e4-17f6-07e6-a2bde375f87e@freebsd.org> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 13:57:19 -0000 Julian Elischer wrote: > So this seems to be a speciality of mine. > > I often find that I need a ports tree at rev X except for some port > foo/bar that needs to be at some different rev (Y) to pick up a > fix/change needed by the application. Now there is no reason that I > can't just edit the distinfo file and the Makefile and replace X with > Y, and that nearly always works if X and Y are not too different. I'd > prefer however to be able to upgrade the Makefile to the right level, > but that then hits the problem that he Makefile is using an API with > the rest of the ports system, that is rapidly changing. SO you have > much more chance of your build failing because of Makefile changes > than due to incompatibilities in the distfiles. > > My personal way of handing that would be to break the pkg rev out to a > separate file with nothing but PORTVERSION and PORTREVISION in it so > that the version of the distfile being fetched is divorced from the > ports API. Then in my tree I update distinfo and the new Portrev and > leave the Makefile alone. > > Does anyone else have a better way to slide a particular port back or > ahead compared to the rest of the tree? > I have perl script that looks at the new tree and compares it to the old (my custom) tree and automatically updates all the ports using the old API, adding and removing patches/patchfiles as it goes... Also have half a dozen fixes in my tree for stuff that is just wrong (may still be, may not matter with the even changing nature of the FreeBSD tree.)... The script can also point at individual ports and do just those as necessary, and if it detects that I have manually put in a newer version it just goes and ignores all changes until the FreeBSD tree for that port catches up... My advice, write your own that fixes the API to how you want it until you're ready to update the API or every time the API changes take it up the.... erm, enough of that please! :P Regards, Michelle From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jan 6 14:04:55 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D057CA2EBA for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 14:04:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0754F1CF8 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 14:04:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 06A10CA2EB8; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 14:04:55 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06477CA2EB6 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 14:04:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from land.berklix.org (land.berklix.org [144.76.10.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B8941CF7; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 14:04:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (pD9FE9A81.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.254.154.129]) (authenticated bits=128) by land.berklix.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPA id v06E4lgj040655; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 14:04:47 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id v06E4iFI031766; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 15:04:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id v06E4VVP092162; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 15:04:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <201701061404.v06E4VVP092162@fire.js.berklix.net> To: Mathieu Arnold cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/devel/noweb/Makefile FETCH_* is wrong, comment out works. From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.eu BSD Unix Linux Consultants, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.eu/free/ X-From: http://www.berklix.eu/~jhs/ In-reply-to: Your message "Fri, 06 Jan 2017 01:13:19 +0100." <201701060013.v060DJZ7046035@fire.js.berklix.net> Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 15:04:31 +0100 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 14:04:55 -0000 > > Do feel free to open a PR about the regression :-) > > Thanks, Will do, Done. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215830 Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix Sys Eng Consultant Munich Reply below, Prefix '> '. Plain text, No .doc, base64, HTML, quoted-printable. http://berklix.eu/brexit/#stolen_votes From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jan 6 16:43:19 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A866CA282A for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 16:43:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBFBD19B1 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 16:43:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E874ACA2829; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 16:43:18 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8263CA2827 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 16:43:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6C8619B0 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 16:43:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from lowell-desk.lan (router.lan [172.30.250.2]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E6733C24 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 11:43:06 -0500 (EST) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 5DEB439828; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 11:43:05 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: "ports\@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: using ports for things they were never meant to do References: <73d145f2-10e4-17f6-07e6-a2bde375f87e@freebsd.org> Reply-To: "ports\@FreeBSD.org" Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 11:43:04 -0500 In-Reply-To: <73d145f2-10e4-17f6-07e6-a2bde375f87e@freebsd.org> (Julian Elischer's message of "Fri, 6 Jan 2017 16:40:20 +0800") Message-ID: <44a8b4m95z.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 16:43:19 -0000 Julian Elischer writes: > So this seems to be a speciality of mine. > > I often find that I need a ports tree at rev X except for some port > foo/bar that needs to be at some different rev (Y) to pick up a > fix/change needed by the application. Now there is no reason that I > can't just edit the distinfo file and the Makefile and replace X with > Y, and that nearly always works if X and Y are not too different. I'd > prefer however to be able to upgrade the Makefile to the right level, > but that then hits the problem that he Makefile is using an API with > the rest of the ports system, that is rapidly changing. SO you have > much more chance of your build failing because of Makefile changes > than due to incompatibilities in the distfiles. > > My personal way of handing that would be to break the pkg rev out to a > separate file with nothing but PORTVERSION and PORTREVISION in it so > that the version of the distfile being fetched is divorced from the > ports API. Then in my tree I update distinfo and the new Portrev and > leave the Makefile alone. > > Does anyone else have a better way to slide a particular port back or > ahead compared to the rest of the tree? I find it easier to use sticky dates in Subversion... From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jan 6 20:05:35 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86545CA2765 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 20:05:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from nschwqsrv02p.mx.bigpond.com (nschwqsrv02p.mx.bigpond.com [61.9.189.234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "InterMail Test Certificate", Issuer "Certificate Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEC66132B for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 20:05:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from nschwcmgw07p ([61.9.190.167]) by nschwmtas02p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20170106195145.HLFM29733.nschwmtas02p.mx.bigpond.com@nschwcmgw07p> for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 19:51:45 +0000 Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org ([120.146.8.15]) by nschwcmgw07p with BigPond Outbound id V7rl1u00L0KTh74017rl7X; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 19:51:45 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=at5PcntV c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=4q38a75ucWZEoAuqF1Taiw==:117 a=4q38a75ucWZEoAuqF1Taiw==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=IgFoBzBjUZAA:10 a=f5bxjWYIrVfbyCRKxhQA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=UXq6MMPjFDsA:10 Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id v06JpjZF039683 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 06:51:45 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from localhost (dave@localhost) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id v06JpiIW039680 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 06:51:45 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) X-Authentication-Warning: aneurin.horsfall.org: dave owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2017 06:51:44 +1100 (EST) From: Dave Horsfall To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: portsnap temporary files Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) X-Home-Page: http://www.horsfall.org/ X-Witty-Saying: "chmod 666 the_mode_of_the_beast" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 20:05:35 -0000 Is there some reason why portsnap cannot clean up /var/db/portsnap/files? I've just had to remove a zillion of them, a bunch at a time because "rm" choked on the arg list. Perhaps a "portsnap clean" command? I'm surprised that there isn't one. -- Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer." From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jan 6 20:26:23 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BB8FCA2443 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 20:26:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@gmx.de) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A790C1438 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 20:26:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@gmx.de) Received: from [192.168.100.100] ([87.139.233.65]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Ledpu-1cqLWX1MQY-00qQJq; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 21:26:19 +0100 Subject: Re: portsnap temporary files To: FreeBSD Ports References: From: olli hauer Cc: Dave Horsfall Message-ID: <5d95e085-4f4b-3f31-bc66-0442f9d8b003@gmx.de> Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 21:27:56 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:q72Nm+Wx4bNtc3CqhDtgj5GazJyRHevwgeHd02rlYKNr2H3hbjI 3kXawj6cL9mFZDtV/ghoUumgJJvp4uxp6ORLtUKqQn5hTUK4obSIAwrpOcJqqCBc/6OOTbt 59Fy+eJYHpEq4b4S6y8+78Z3bVxoIISVmJmHtsHKgDvOW/q4+yjxIdXHo26393wKgUnBNEn GgKujBHt+i8pPlIquvzkQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:3jFsuehfowg=:4gfWIb/YJhn3TTNGm/fwyE AAWLqFhj7z8fhqv8SfdAgVX4Sgz16Jg7P8+08RdzewVYWozXqeYlfNKaj4f28ki1902Kl2R6j f/Je6v/fj6kOFdQCq8ejMu0QQ0OR/+wQiH3f7xK3kjVtdinnqSR0eSFNpn949BE6xKZTs4Lm4 z/vJBhm8P/u8Ss3QF5CRgFtE1yZx9Mg5xCmYYJxLkTe93gIShJsI0pZZpRj30sg4RJ4kA0Q0T O3r8FiaY89GndJsYgG4dnrMSZ1g5CcUouiKVB70zStl3ds7PBPFrkIbY9fCYj0HFbSRNqPiH/ yGPolH71oJyLeThx7oWM6q0xi7qMgKSuFKOr/K0K8SWnm0dT4NnhsyN9r58hWmlE+4bbrLQO1 V/wFwTQiYQhqOimSDiNungAgDAmiA6NCgMeBI0J/NYcJn6syhMoKzTbeQhO8gJCKrgVANYaQs vec4l7pxtto4R8R8Z2SGvYk+tjKM5/TwSWUvGOvbaktDdsBuWKh1OfbKVjBqsHFZ8M4xvVmAs Gf84pTrBLRbC+E10f9xr5UIa6kusatBNbRGo0pZn7Z3iPzcLbVwZoUHeIEK2VJu+IUogWs45B JeDy5EojlZRxSmPPY9SttNx5NoFa6vrIP1oZBzG9Ovpo07/V8Rh8zdcPmPklmrn1rTXm6H8DY qwRPOL+PBb/U5VdlPCG4bh7PHd2bpFi8XAki60Adi7r+YZYFlwIMgIOzuYQpbhXIyuDKyWJid 9JA38h+Wga3MtgV1spoeUql1sNBoj0B+/ogmkRuTVeFKOjTJfOF5MQpTpTIwiq62uiaCOmVRx UWSNWwo X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 20:26:23 -0000 On 2017-01-06 20:51, Dave Horsfall wrote: > Is there some reason why portsnap cannot clean up /var/db/portsnap/files? > I've just had to remove a zillion of them, a bunch at a time because "rm" > choked on the arg list. > > Perhaps a "portsnap clean" command? I'm surprised that there isn't one. > Why? As soon you run "portsnap fetch" old files in this directory are purged! If you look into /var/db/portsnap/INDEX you can see the mapping of the files I'm running portsnap on one system since portsnap was introduced and never had issues with cleanups. -- olli From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jan 6 21:05:16 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AA9ECA25B4 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 21:05:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from nschwqsrv03p.mx.bigpond.com (nschwqsrv03p.mx.bigpond.com [61.9.189.237]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "InterMail Test Certificate", Issuer "Certificate Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7437D10AD for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 21:05:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from nschwcmgw05p ([61.9.190.165]) by nschwmtas05p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20170106203445.RFIL28550.nschwmtas05p.mx.bigpond.com@nschwcmgw05p> for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 20:34:45 +0000 Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org ([120.146.8.15]) by nschwcmgw05p with BigPond Outbound id V8al1u0060KTh74018alke; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 20:34:45 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=RY5tcAZv c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=4q38a75ucWZEoAuqF1Taiw==:117 a=4q38a75ucWZEoAuqF1Taiw==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=IgFoBzBjUZAA:10 a=EH34cckynq8aunbCXkEA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id v06KYj8H039874 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 07:34:45 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from localhost (dave@localhost) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id v06KYj79039871 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 07:34:45 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) X-Authentication-Warning: aneurin.horsfall.org: dave owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2017 07:34:44 +1100 (EST) From: Dave Horsfall To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: portsnap temporary files In-Reply-To: <5d95e085-4f4b-3f31-bc66-0442f9d8b003@gmx.de> Message-ID: References: <5d95e085-4f4b-3f31-bc66-0442f9d8b003@gmx.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) X-Home-Page: http://www.horsfall.org/ X-Witty-Saying: "chmod 666 the_mode_of_the_beast" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 21:05:16 -0000 On Fri, 6 Jan 2017, olli hauer wrote: > Why? For the reason I stated; I had to remove hundreds of them by hand. > As soon you run "portsnap fetch" old files in this directory are purged! Not here they weren't... > If you look into /var/db/portsnap/INDEX you can see the mapping of the > files I don't have that file. > I'm running portsnap on one system since portsnap was introduced and > never had issues with cleanups. Hmmm... -- Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer." From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jan 6 22:30:59 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E53ECA2555 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 22:30:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rde@tavi.co.uk) Received: from kipling.tavi.co.uk (kipling.tavi.co.uk [81.187.145.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 091C31DA0 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 22:30:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rde@tavi.co.uk) Received: from raksha.tavi.co.uk (raksha.tavi.co.uk [81.187.145.139]) by kipling.tavi.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACEB175968 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 22:30:50 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 22:30:50 +0000 From: Bob Eager To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsnap temporary files Message-ID: <20170106223050.0fcbed48@raksha.tavi.co.uk> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.29; i386-portbld-freebsd10.3) Face: 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==== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 22:30:59 -0000 On Sat, 7 Jan 2017 06:51:44 +1100 (EST) Dave Horsfall wrote: > Is there some reason why portsnap cannot clean > up /var/db/portsnap/files? I've just had to remove a zillion of them, > a bunch at a time because "rm" choked on the arg list. > > Perhaps a "portsnap clean" command? I'm surprised that there isn't > one. find and xargs will do it in one go. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jan 6 23:22:37 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C1EECA2C6C for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 23:22:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: from mail-io0-x235.google.com (mail-io0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1099A1655 for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 23:22:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: by mail-io0-x235.google.com with SMTP id v96so43620296ioi.0 for ; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 15:22:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chen-org-nz.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=bXFWlWvP1HsrFjVolkGul2ubbWtCLbf5SKom3AQ1tK4=; b=uqBuwQ09gVNQWxyLiC9abNq6mUsS6zaeX50vdxK5Je+waWUhkq7nAVeieHXjnyeNEP Vq0Q+KSomAAWoMF+3OSxpg3bC5ZinNX1hAxBprVe+g3C49bv/kNEvqFUE/uSNGPYMNyn d6hDTV6XHTIE9soZhOD8lPKvyGoNHWSD0gyt0N8H1K04Sih/qBrZ9NRE8f+Vbcu5AZVy UZhWi7aziPM3gkjZ+i5xFSc+D/3nFSCMN8zsB+Ooxs0CKqry3nlQaMs9eT8qP6CCd/cV NU3ktc6J+9gFqgXuPKnKwMoMBRe639fbkxTCb6GQG+SsbxLKx33BvnQj3CPH3ofJ9s3s Ix8Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=bXFWlWvP1HsrFjVolkGul2ubbWtCLbf5SKom3AQ1tK4=; b=ZXDAleWCQwoAa939YfCICufI6t0r5YTPQxP0I7b+RiPtwmTmUfXc1nBPyMIaNpVqr3 tjJ8VosR1uSr5btPkWUoW653mZ7WtMeGd6CHDs1RSgtRzsPhbl/f4HyBOkAxCSvyQo4j ut6M5A8DSzVh7fmghGq2r/sB+DPhokil1w6WIm5fu2elBOPdlLYvHTc4vmyNvonXTtRx l+YPRASU5uhkZQjm1F6w6LWkk2zCqai1vIfDSQE2Y3RVBK0LHxNLh1sIfTAbt0+ua9a5 n/1wPD1C37Yx67efTXFoUvo9lGWQGruAR2W4V5OG1i8GO+wcwyVg9ga33SNc3XgA8I1l 8l9w== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIaLxyOVqE19kChm2teCiqyOdoxWT+rOMNudiKeo9hM3FFda9TDBAXwNWq2Sj+pi0biou1xqrSl+0YNGw== X-Received: by 10.107.27.134 with SMTP id b128mr14549848iob.165.1483744955923; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 15:22:35 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.79.97.197 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 15:22:35 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [101.53.196.124] In-Reply-To: <20170106223050.0fcbed48@raksha.tavi.co.uk> References: <20170106223050.0fcbed48@raksha.tavi.co.uk> From: Jonathan Chen Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2017 12:22:35 +1300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: portsnap temporary files To: Bob Eager Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 23:22:37 -0000 On 7 January 2017 at 11:30, Bob Eager wrote: > On Sat, 7 Jan 2017 06:51:44 +1100 (EST) > Dave Horsfall wrote: > >> Is there some reason why portsnap cannot clean >> up /var/db/portsnap/files? I've just had to remove a zillion of them, >> a bunch at a time because "rm" choked on the arg list. >> >> Perhaps a "portsnap clean" command? I'm surprised that there isn't >> one. > > find and xargs will do it in one go. find with -delete saves a few processes. -- Jonathan Chen From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Jan 6 23:46:27 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEC22CA327F for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 23:46:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from nskntqsrv01p.mx.bigpond.com (nskntqsrv01p.mx.bigpond.com [61.9.168.231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "InterMail Test Certificate", Issuer "Certificate Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23CD5167A for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 23:46:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from nskntcmgw06p ([61.9.169.166]) by nskntmtas05p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20170106233441.SVBO2121.nskntmtas05p.mx.bigpond.com@nskntcmgw06p> for ; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 23:34:41 +0000 Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org ([120.146.8.15]) by nskntcmgw06p with BigPond Outbound id VBag1u00J0KTh7401BahEp; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 23:34:41 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=H/EmuLsi c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=4q38a75ucWZEoAuqF1Taiw==:117 a=4q38a75ucWZEoAuqF1Taiw==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=IgFoBzBjUZAA:10 a=5tpr02QpQ7QseXaRcTkA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=PV3FpSnurbYA:10 Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id v06NYe4e040561 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 10:34:40 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from localhost (dave@localhost) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id v06NYdnS040558 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 10:34:40 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) X-Authentication-Warning: aneurin.horsfall.org: dave owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2017 10:34:39 +1100 (EST) From: Dave Horsfall To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: portsnap temporary files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20170106223050.0fcbed48@raksha.tavi.co.uk> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) X-Home-Page: http://www.horsfall.org/ X-Witty-Saying: "chmod 666 the_mode_of_the_beast" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 23:46:27 -0000 (Many responses) I note that no-one has answered the question which caused me to post the message in the first place viz: why weren't the files being removed automatically? Everyone appears to have missed this point... -- Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer." From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jan 7 00:04:22 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F564CA3829 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 00:04:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rde@tavi.co.uk) Received: from kipling.tavi.co.uk (kipling.tavi.co.uk [81.187.145.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAAD61FCB for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 00:04:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rde@tavi.co.uk) Received: from raksha.tavi.co.uk (raksha.tavi.co.uk [81.187.145.139]) by kipling.tavi.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADFBB75961 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 00:04:19 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2017 00:04:19 +0000 From: Bob Eager To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsnap temporary files Message-ID: <20170107000419.50a0e25b@raksha.tavi.co.uk> In-Reply-To: References: <20170106223050.0fcbed48@raksha.tavi.co.uk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.29; i386-portbld-freebsd10.3) Face: 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==== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2017 00:04:22 -0000 On Sat, 7 Jan 2017 10:34:39 +1100 (EST) Dave Horsfall wrote: > (Many responses) > > I note that no-one has answered the question which caused me to post > the message in the first place viz: why weren't the files being > removed automatically? Everyone appears to have missed this point... > Didn't miss the point, just didn't know the answer! (and offered a [rather poor] workaround)! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jan 7 00:09:03 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCB74CA38E1 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 00:09:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x22e.google.com (mail-wm0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 521781102 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 00:09:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id a197so43354287wmd.0 for ; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 16:09:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Tqe3KMagRnKubqNW52C8MBcWoJoEzjFHGncCjP3zonc=; b=GMG6aa/2EcUF40tpq7r6DeXsgH/MI9K1nLKhMl0AUXw0/JC6gnsp3rsSMtCjozKEWq 6O9R+fOlmr8xaSNIx30O//CNGPdlpchbi4QZue4irJtNT6r9J2vAHdneg5iiNsL2RfCB Wt9LgJ9n+bZvXCaALQPO18MQcPW7As7TqqCvmP+IvGghlrVMLD4gIwE7ZvY0hiquTHH+ zyU6t0S0JUk0Ay789NlZA92CcIuVBUvf/kqLKctoSnZKOPUxGlTDiT1+32cn5WsLyGdC tIKduy2fHwwkQplfg8d+zPT6Xz0r2x2qnUZWmrgMFtfBILJRHpiz/UwXE5TX3n868c/c +/Mw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Tqe3KMagRnKubqNW52C8MBcWoJoEzjFHGncCjP3zonc=; b=k23nY6bPVxkmwMdd3kMSyUdVQBEiMbonugJ4kQKkH7LWtlBpvHJmqVYsl6FBwG7Ene zA14NqikRVCOEPAXCiUqVk//e5eILGXFhI1OfJ3F/cwcrw1oH8OmgrdqhmQIrAM07Mpu w25zzMBmMfKau+BGq86cy7WVVIabYv7Jnz/UszloXgMnw5mrBScMDLLpaY+RlqanRBZ/ CPCLvbmcXv2sCIuOZIaNwXUFpZaLv3pxU+fJmVlZrFayudMDjQOpnYIX3Wgt5GKpui2P IDismYOL7mv+eiMHD6CdbD5WjrImoYj4VgW71WmsdSlNI3E4SzXmTo4+Qq8V34ED03Vh jL6w== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKWs4fhnRwhxFusg/fkJvpnQ99Ku3WyAjH7w3+2zIfHKOB+8tS0KGCeXkmyDanq9r2B12KVz0NWrsw6Jw== X-Received: by 10.223.142.195 with SMTP id q61mr3056440wrb.2.1483747740942; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 16:09:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.74.100 with HTTP; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 16:09:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20170106223050.0fcbed48@raksha.tavi.co.uk> From: Xin LI Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2017 16:09:00 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: portsnap temporary files To: Dave Horsfall Cc: FreeBSD Ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2017 00:09:03 -0000 Because the files are still being used? What makes you believe they are unused, by the way? On Fri, Jan 6, 2017 at 3:34 PM, Dave Horsfall wrote: > (Many responses) > > I note that no-one has answered the question which caused me to post the > message in the first place viz: why weren't the files being removed > automatically? Everyone appears to have missed this point... > > -- > Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will > suffer." > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jan 7 00:16:30 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF4F2CA3B53 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 00:16:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michelle@sorbs.net) Received: from hades.sorbs.net (mail.sorbs.net [67.231.146.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0FC016AC for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 00:16:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michelle@sorbs.net) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed Received: from C02LJ0HMFFT4.corp.proofpoint.com (static.belong.com.au [141.168.241.229]) by hades.sorbs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.29.0 64bit (built Jul 9 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0OJD002YIVT1JA50@hades.sorbs.net> for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 16:24:39 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: portsnap temporary files To: Dave Horsfall , FreeBSD Ports References: <20170106223050.0fcbed48@raksha.tavi.co.uk> From: Michelle Sullivan Message-id: Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2017 11:16:06 +1100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:49.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/49.0 SeaMonkey/2.46 In-reply-to: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2017 00:16:30 -0000 Dave Horsfall wrote: > (Many responses) > > I note that no-one has answered the question which caused me to post the > message in the first place viz: why weren't the files being removed > automatically? Everyone appears to have missed this point... > I didn't and some of the answers are helpful even if not answering the original. "portsnap fetch" - I wasn't aware it removed the old files at the beginning, but will take the other poster's word for that (especially after checking the remaining few remaining systems I have on FreeBSD would seem to indicate it as a fact)... however "rm -r /var/db/portsnap && portsnap fetch" is an easy way to clean everything up... if you think it's not working correctly. The index file you will have is: /var/db/portsnap/INDEX It is possible this was deleted/replaced at some time thereby losing the mapping of the files... perhaps a working directory failure (out of space etc).. but that should be fixed at every successful fetch as it finishes with the following lines of code: # Move files into their proper locations rm -f tag INDEX tINDEX rm -rf files mv tag.new tag mv tINDEX.new tINDEX mv INDEX.new INDEX mv snap/ files/ ('snap' being created new everytime).. The other part you might not be considering is that the files have to be cleaned up on the portsnap server (snapshot builder) itself... but again looking at code it should 'just work' - unless someone has tampered with it since I downloaded it all and setup my own server... Regards, Michelle From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jan 7 00:45:41 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98C06B874BA for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 00:45:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from nskntqsrv02p.mx.bigpond.com (nskntqsrv02p.mx.bigpond.com [61.9.168.234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "InterMail Test Certificate", Issuer "Certificate Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9E81164E for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 00:45:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from nskntcmgw08p ([61.9.169.168]) by nskntmtas06p.mx.bigpond.com with ESMTP id <20170107002747.OMHO28818.nskntmtas06p.mx.bigpond.com@nskntcmgw08p> for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 00:27:47 +0000 Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org ([120.146.8.15]) by nskntcmgw08p with BigPond Outbound id VCTn1u00J0KTh7401CTn3Q; Sat, 07 Jan 2017 00:27:47 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=DL5ymH5b c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=4q38a75ucWZEoAuqF1Taiw==:117 a=4q38a75ucWZEoAuqF1Taiw==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=IgFoBzBjUZAA:10 a=Ei0NtTLLhgaYCoT2qigA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=DBdyCIFv1WQA:10 Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id v070RkFY040774 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 11:27:46 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from localhost (dave@localhost) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id v070RkSC040771 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 11:27:46 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) X-Authentication-Warning: aneurin.horsfall.org: dave owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2017 11:27:46 +1100 (EST) From: Dave Horsfall To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: portsnap temporary files In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20170106223050.0fcbed48@raksha.tavi.co.uk> User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (BSF 67 2015-01-07) X-Home-Page: http://www.horsfall.org/ X-Witty-Saying: "chmod 666 the_mode_of_the_beast" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2017 00:45:41 -0000 On Fri, 6 Jan 2017, Xin LI wrote: > Because the files are still being used? What makes you believe they are > unused, by the way? How would I tell? Some were there since last October, surviving a few reboots... What I do see is the INDEX file containing "...|$tmpfile"; could that be the problem? That INDEX hadn't been cleaned out for some reason? -- Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer." From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jan 7 02:48:57 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03156CA3A85 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 02:48:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D534D101A for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 02:48:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D49A9CA3A84; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 02:48:56 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4425CA3A83 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 02:48:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-pf0-x244.google.com (mail-pf0-x244.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::244]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA2AE1018 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 02:48:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: by mail-pf0-x244.google.com with SMTP id y68so30734652pfb.1 for ; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 18:48:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=URbyya/QRMgwtl1H5tqKAVdRiNPikkX+fXAZIQQ8xaU=; b=rPt6pmOH6Sj8Vn+aJ+sUWP1nshhnByOtS8ezj1XY0UgxMl/vP3uKEIFIZATX06Ra/l U1JcZrCNO+mJJ6Kpl8aLCJxkr7l2oeuuI/twZpCN9Sd7BoqdaXnCz4ikgx7fTvoGR5mS d+zn7JIkWgZdHzoWA4weFW2rfxGvMZBH4mbqF27Dosq2W+mrEv+Gf/R7/OqZBoQ0EJbP kS0Jwr3MmZ3J1D1qpx6xZWSL1Yjk5vTSI7umsjHnXhg3+zl1NrvaGjtGo4QY0NBG2JW6 oqgqaOKrcCPmX2Xo2AX+K4q0BppyWRoPCSQc2hjQsbO1RSmJ0cEQc7UvGWTRRtuqvJnk 3S5w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=URbyya/QRMgwtl1H5tqKAVdRiNPikkX+fXAZIQQ8xaU=; b=KJhZ2LR9Y6ozT+ablbyMIjMWfphKrpEfyN0enGBkc7ZfWkcDxOIPycmnLZzJfMeRRf MPgYswy94O/YNc0Vc9nQiX0rkUVhvQ/mpTvoDFgcQ+6zd9yEmpo62uN2fU814jSBcxRY x+0T9AWTpWi+K33TXqEmwWBjmzOQcAqJYrVUEyeLzQQDNr0YRXi0Aa11BP/MZZA2apCV 8qGfG9vChkhUdKPCQIzIoW9EW2RO8bSFREh4/dbM6/uw/z2GzvAc+HRy03XbfA1mS32n W5uiYX29BJJ9gG0iIhjnXlpglefdEyDN8IgtukF76WNrkVst32fJb9y6G01YKNBpBYw/ ciXw== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJYCjEDaG73CbVFyrtkJxPXnBYDJ3uElfZqV/88ewxefV4BV34h+aqw765Sfo8Xdw== X-Received: by 10.99.208.21 with SMTP id z21mr145612221pgf.79.1483757336110; Fri, 06 Jan 2017 18:48:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com ([202.38.174.41]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l3sm164035463pgc.41.2017.01.06.18.48.52 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Fri, 06 Jan 2017 18:48:55 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2017 02:48:46 +0000 From: RW To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsnap temporary files Message-ID: <20170107024846.3c355beb@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.1 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.3) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2017 02:48:57 -0000 On Sat, 7 Jan 2017 06:51:44 +1100 (EST) Dave Horsfall wrote: > Is there some reason why portsnap cannot clean > up /var/db/portsnap/files? I've just had to remove a zillion of them, > a bunch at a time because "rm" choked on the arg list. If you mean files under /var/db/portsnap/files/ then these are not temporary files, they are the compressed snapshot, and you should not delete them without very good reason. They are supposed to persist and may remain unmodified for many months. Zillion is a bit vague, there should be one file for each port plus one for each file outside a port directory. I have ~27k files. The temporary .gz files are stored in the directory above and may be deleted. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jan 7 08:18:26 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CDBACA48EB for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 08:18:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A4D61BAF for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 08:18:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 69B3FCA48E9; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 08:18:26 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6963ECA48E8 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 08:18:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (portscout.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CBD41BAD for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 08:18:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v078IQZa076682 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 08:18:26 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v078IQV8076681; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 08:18:26 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201701070818.v078IQV8076681@portscout.ysv.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.ysv.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2017 08:18:26 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2017 08:18:26 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ multimedia/lives | 2.8.1 | 2.8.3 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jan 7 21:27:19 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27C1ACA4D05 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 21:27:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartmann@walstatt.org) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E4F216FE for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 21:27:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartmann@walstatt.org) Received: from thor.intern.walstatt.dynvpn.de ([85.179.134.2]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102 [212.227.17.168]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LiWzQ-1d2b7R3KUG-00ceuo for ; Sat, 07 Jan 2017 22:27:09 +0100 Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2017 22:26:53 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: poudriere: failing build after math/proj.4 has been introduced Message-ID: <20170107222653.1443094b@thor.intern.walstatt.dynvpn.de> Organization: WALSTATT User-Agent: OutScare 3.1415926 X-Operating-System: ImNotAnOperatingSystem 3.141592527 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/zzkd5JB2SYkqS+HvUufJlRZ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:xl7TPlYnMpAOyO3DyJs3v/N2T7mnU+tbN9TPZK3nXotHojOx6xp KwDc0OJFsfI5NlwfPxVntIHm6bbYFG4U/8j+RNVRGA7cN7/JPwE0yS0JZWc0RLpAnMgFSDW L0UcNeAbwaVok+ieQXk56ojalZ4wLCiNhczzVIEOn2yh2upuw980NL0mYBJK6+oLm625L8Q xPsvDyh1E0eBb5pd8F33A== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:MhIke/JQPvA=:CiOnYdIai4sU5qDY1YUEMf GRYxnk1ElNC/+soq975D8UGR9JRYsuWGAFtsl3FiaT+cD/4xqJc0XFQqPWat3zNld+FH+H15O VWgdGSE059Yagq5vWM3KCq/9QenYFal9mU1mbzlpdK15kwR5AaCNgOc1JraKVAbH84zqBtpIH x91ZzLJHp2ZzAKAIg43yIIOu5EodDQENh63YER1q+qnLHRNYvvupRx9Th1qEE6yhdLA+ThsFj oEHYbtfPgu+r91B3TwE5qlJANo9+R50EqmPDxSfyCH5HXJuR2OOc0RSCe+S4XqR9HShX4vJSg LjAw0AAzfszWqBu/Yv86864y4WqSFTBFbNWTciDh27ry6VEkCAUfoISJbjF1jo9EYzFmZ+sA0 U+fd+DWev55g7Tp430kZXKIY7x9oWCqIXezRMhF9tlGZSWCSyHhNp7bsrpqoOaBLXMhR4h/sP ZGkxUsCvl0Msq+rFfW1NB2T1d9aDoDXdppJ+gcWS83gkPrlvPPNlBImBE+Aq9iHvSJOHS4W0r Jbouw9n9niL1iMMcoe4yQrlmOZFslP9ql60/6Y4Y0Exx2OH0DytjpO3DaISJ7v7Xl7DF1Ea/W 0iPZ3D/zCU6gd3B/7yZB+uC5Xc+cr3deHUNGhN31UKWuW2nR4OQ39fgGz/0v9WMQNGD8/ouyp +QHI3NHMjBY35VPA/6c/EpUa9iRbUH8qFj9v2wXJSp6mVaiS1ko9FS3wcqa1mL5BrArHckuLb ZvBiIz9e33IRSn5GttgWNi5WD9KOFXO0PdPXQQQZbUduWBLmuw+9ipr7tH8= X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2017 21:27:19 -0000 --Sig_/zzkd5JB2SYkqS+HvUufJlRZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable My poudriere setup fails after a ports tree update with the following error: [00:00:04] =3D=3D=3D=3D>> Loading MOVED /usr/local/share/poudriere/bulk.sh: cannot create /pool/poudriere/data/.m/head-amd64-head-default/ref/.p/MOVED/math_li= bproj4:math/proj.4: No such file or directory How can this be fixed? Please CC me, I'm not subscribing to this list. Thanks in advance, oh --=20 O. Hartmann Ich widerspreche der Nutzung oder =C3=9Cbermittlung meiner Daten f=C3=BCr Werbezwecke oder f=C3=BCr die Markt- oder Meinungsforschung (=C2=A7 28 Abs.= 4 BDSG). --Sig_/zzkd5JB2SYkqS+HvUufJlRZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iLUEARMKAB0WIQQZVZMzAtwC2T/86TrS528fyFhYlAUCWHFdHQAKCRDS528fyFhY lNnyAf965bodX9yoQM2WAzBupWQv9tPt69XO+Yf3nQd7FRT5I8wBHB/isUgt+j4N onSKt5T1ulRGBVE5Oh7zjYQC0pqVAgCRo2lhbOCGEMxCJrhvca886C7EImvYlyvs KWNkgLvHgmgblHNCei1nJ+CqZi/kPUMmCx3D8IOcBHUartvWiN8p =F4Hh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/zzkd5JB2SYkqS+HvUufJlRZ-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jan 7 21:48:34 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3EC4CA475C for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 21:48:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from anoxia.adamw.org (anoxia.adamw.org [104.225.8.149]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "anoxia.adamw.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4101177F for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 21:48:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by anoxia.adamw.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id dce62342 TLS version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 14:48:26 -0700 (MST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\)) Subject: Re: poudriere: failing build after math/proj.4 has been introduced From: Adam Weinberger In-Reply-To: <20170107222653.1443094b@thor.intern.walstatt.dynvpn.de> Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2017 14:48:25 -0700 Cc: FreeBSD Ports Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <4F59A7A4-61BC-47CD-A3E9-029A817D6D19@adamw.org> References: <20170107222653.1443094b@thor.intern.walstatt.dynvpn.de> To: "O. Hartmann" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2017 21:48:35 -0000 > On 7 Jan, 2017, at 14:26, O. Hartmann wrote: >=20 >=20 > My poudriere setup fails after a ports tree update with the following = error: >=20 > [00:00:04] =3D=3D=3D=3D>> Loading MOVED > /usr/local/share/poudriere/bulk.sh: cannot > create = /pool/poudriere/data/.m/head-amd64-head-default/ref/.p/MOVED/math_libproj4= :math/proj.4: > No such file or directory >=20 > How can this be fixed? >=20 >=20 > Please CC me, I'm not subscribing to this list. >=20 > Thanks in advance, >=20 > oh There was a typo in /usr/ports/MOVED. Should be fixed now. # Adam --=20 Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Jan 7 23:15:23 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E641BCA47E0 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 23:15:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from o.hartmann@walstatt.org) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4745B1B8D for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2017 23:15:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from o.hartmann@walstatt.org) Received: from thor.intern.walstatt.dynvpn.de ([85.179.134.2]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MY86C-1bv5El3KLY-00UuOW; Sun, 08 Jan 2017 00:15:11 +0100 Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 00:15:04 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" To: Adam Weinberger Cc: "O. Hartmann" , FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: poudriere: failing build after math/proj.4 has been introduced Message-ID: <20170108001504.4b761f65@thor.intern.walstatt.dynvpn.de> In-Reply-To: <4F59A7A4-61BC-47CD-A3E9-029A817D6D19@adamw.org> References: <20170107222653.1443094b@thor.intern.walstatt.dynvpn.de> <4F59A7A4-61BC-47CD-A3E9-029A817D6D19@adamw.org> Organization: WALSTATT User-Agent: OutScare 3.1415926 X-Operating-System: ImNotAnOperatingSystem 3.141592527 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/805Z0GazoXcevyP0b5gUS+_"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:EGX1WTRpSHD/hvKf5SBY8jib85tDbod+rfLUutqUx39SZ87iLMd dpKVmQqQQUHkqCeeGp5r95rhJBzin6/5OqyXFVehSIDrXoPn8O6RvXh/Lqph2z46a/bCxNF eJkwf5iZGYOhb6GFrDvSXUXXw/OEf9HIrUPdFTA7+wndy4LrYoh+POKU7fAKkenJMKRODbL Lm9i5D5th3bYnojWiWr1A== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:tCamVp+cekw=:iVJXJRCZDCy3eH4Fxh2sYp b/+GcHiIYwZ9jBxCa44LSzgQKLQVcrt/qGy1whbAYL51lIdF1bwh2fbgv3W0T7VrfAXdfPgP3 dt4G9tBj/LKN377Eu9/gfrN12zSYk3uHIQa40O3euGwXMFwk76qujuEtIaLwAMU1Du3XmCHlZ 2coR8gKstwnOI40m0lZXiNl6Adi2YJcpteYZ0tpie8MsA+pkFED2BZeXMDEOKwoJGSZhEJo8c jqvm99bIGyDx6bZuVWHERPEs10MiTpuErpb+qxxVcfEoTK+L/D6p2zTP7RtmqppI5VuRbv1+V skhMPBar5IwreF9sfcfPWDH0/5VWaSLXVP66S7HxRvCD23+XIqYoNzlVUJSakKAjsG43jiD3G YjRiRPUzwHdrsimjOopzTNeP7M+6yuTZf40aE/hg8gGSL3V0eyJXDPoMPQEjT8+0l4rnHOL0v V0X5NFrqlnJJFkBbIWVbFj39GYYh0Ry1u1pIqjrMNm9gJfON0PbasF+w0mA1b45XuuK9PSh30 UNc55eKz5g4RFwNXNiU+jgrcQSP67jZPNbMdNZ9vsQCjuuUt0t2qk+/s8ckMoDkG0PMTlrl6z 6UnOnGvVx6jb8DvEdP5Itub9VKwZx0PCWvhGO9YS2tQooz5BHSSRD8Ks1l4358WG4vrbHLKw8 XtATvQ3Ig2pUGY6p9jCKEohb0RHHkW2fkWiLLgPBXKamUz8j4SSNXudVWk6XTyv5YD7YL28md GRpSykhdHJtG4f293QDsH5uMQoOM5KPjcgDRqBwNbHvMhHTQ6p5rCgGncFU= X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2017 23:15:24 -0000 --Sig_/805Z0GazoXcevyP0b5gUS+_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Sat, 7 Jan 2017 14:48:25 -0700 Adam Weinberger schrieb: > > On 7 Jan, 2017, at 14:26, O. Hartmann wrote: > >=20 > >=20 > > My poudriere setup fails after a ports tree update with the following e= rror: > >=20 > > [00:00:04] =3D=3D=3D=3D>> Loading MOVED > > /usr/local/share/poudriere/bulk.sh: cannot > > create /pool/poudriere/data/.m/head-amd64-head-default/ref/.p/MOVED/mat= h_libproj4:math/proj.4: > > No such file or directory > >=20 > > How can this be fixed? > >=20 > >=20 > > Please CC me, I'm not subscribing to this list. > >=20 > > Thanks in advance, > >=20 > > oh =20 >=20 > There was a typo in /usr/ports/MOVED. Should be fixed now. >=20 > # Adam >=20 >=20 Thanks, indeed ... --=20 O. Hartmann Ich widerspreche der Nutzung oder =C3=9Cbermittlung meiner Daten f=C3=BCr Werbezwecke oder f=C3=BCr die Markt- oder Meinungsforschung (=C2=A7 28 Abs.= 4 BDSG). --Sig_/805Z0GazoXcevyP0b5gUS+_ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iLUEARMKAB0WIQQZVZMzAtwC2T/86TrS528fyFhYlAUCWHF2eAAKCRDS528fyFhY lM28AgCCxMJLg+F4wFFjIwyvYKfvgNvBf/0eW96BdY+BXhG7dKf3Ki7IKX68tJ29 nO/k+q9BsoW4cCempmssI6SVEbxhAf9YSjrX7J6z48jBZPCne659jH87TGr7tePA Hh7qDZS0CaJeFTWCtIBViiQajmaEfHGBCPtmI8j76pzf4ZW9srhZ =55Ai -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/805Z0GazoXcevyP0b5gUS+_--