From owner-freebsd-net Sun Jan 10 06:42:36 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA26768 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 06:42:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from smtp.shellnet.co.uk (smtp.shellnet.co.uk [194.129.209.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA26759 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 06:42:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from steven@shellnet.co.uk) Received: from STEVENF (eth2-fw1.bolton.shellnet.co.uk [194.129.209.8]) by smtp.shellnet.co.uk (8.9.1/8.9.1-shellnet.stevenf) with SMTP id OAA01573 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 14:42:01 GMT Posted-Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 14:42:01 GMT From: steven@shellnet.co.uk (Steven Fletcher) To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: IPFW, Dummynet under 2.2.8-RELEASE. Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 14:42:25 GMT Message-ID: <369bb751.1554035274@smtp.shellnet.co.uk> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.5/32.452 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by hub.freebsd.org id GAA26762 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi all. I hope I'm posting to the correct list here, I thought I'd make certain before possibly making my first post to freebsd-bugs. I've been using Dummynet for the last 3 weeks or so on a machine at the new local cybercafe which we set up, limiting 17 stations to 64Kb/s and one to 128Kb/s. It's been working - to a point. Usually around 3-4PM each day, when the box starts being used more, it crashes, dead. Sometimes it manages to reboot itself, others it cannot. It's also crashed once when I stopped the Apache httpd, and once when stopping Squid (2.1 RELEASE). Sadly, I'm not anywhere near it when it goes down, so I can't see any panic messages, nor are they logged to the /var/log/messages file - only a "Warning: / was not properly dismounted" is the only way I know when it crashed. At first, I thought this was a problem with the machine, and as we were just about to order a replacement box, I've tested it out on a P2-233 here at work. It's a moderatley heavily hit HTTP server, and after 5 mintues of dummynet limiting to 256Kbit/s, it crashed. Both machines were installed as follows: 1) Main install over FTP install system 2) Apache (& Squid for the cybercafe) installed. 3) Recompile the kernel and comment out unneeded drivers, etc. I've put the config file up at http://www3.shellnet.co.uk/shellnet/SHELLNET-1.1 if anyone would like to look at it. 4) Reboot, and add IPFW/dummynet rules, for example: ipfw pipe 131 config bw 64Kbit/s delay 30 ipfw add 131 pipe 131 ip from 193.133.229.131 to any ipfw add 131 pipe 131 ip from any to 193.133.229.131 And about a day later, a crash :(. Running kernel.GENERIC without the IPFW rules, we had an uninterupted uptime of 7 days before we tried the old kernel again, which crashed the next day. I've tried recompiling squid/apache, anything for the new kernel, but nothing seems to work. Is this a known problem, and is there a patch available? Thanks for reading my drivel all :) Steven Fletcher - steven@shellnet.co.uk Shellnet - http://www.shellnet.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sun Jan 10 07:02:51 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id HAA29134 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 07:02:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id HAA29127 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 07:02:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it) Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id NAA16700; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 13:56:33 +0100 From: Luigi Rizzo Message-Id: <199901101256.NAA16700@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Subject: Re: IPFW, Dummynet under 2.2.8-RELEASE. To: steven@shellnet.co.uk (Steven Fletcher) Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 13:56:32 +0100 (MET) Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <369bb751.1554035274@smtp.shellnet.co.uk> from "Steven Fletcher" at Jan 10, 99 02:42:06 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Hi all. > > I hope I'm posting to the correct list here, I thought I'd make > certain before possibly making my first post to freebsd-bugs. > > I've been using Dummynet for the last 3 weeks or so on a machine at > the new local cybercafe which we set up, limiting 17 stations to > 64Kb/s and one to 128Kb/s. It's been working - to a point. > > Usually around 3-4PM each day, when the box starts being used more, it > crashes, dead. Sometimes it manages to reboot itself, others it it is not unlikely that you are running out of MBUFS -- a dummynet pipe uses up to 100 or more of them (depending on how you configure queue size that is) so you need some option NMBCLUSTERS=some-high-value to be safe. of course it should not crash, and of course it would be great if you could investigate more on the problem if it is easily reproducible for you. Another possible source of problems could be that buffers reference a route (descriptor) or something that has changed between the time packet was queued and the time it is sent out. But i tried to avoid this problem by copying things instead of adding references. cheers luigi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sun Jan 10 09:25:56 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA14131 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 09:25:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from smtp.shellnet.co.uk (smtp.shellnet.co.uk [194.129.209.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id JAA14119 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 09:25:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from steven@shellnet.co.uk) Received: from STEVEN (eth2-fw1.bolton.shellnet.co.uk [194.129.209.8]) by smtp.shellnet.co.uk (8.9.1/8.9.1-shellnet.stevenf) with SMTP id RAA04803; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 17:24:24 GMT Posted-Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 17:24:24 GMT From: steven@shellnet.co.uk (Steven Fletcher) To: Luigi Rizzo Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPFW, Dummynet under 2.2.8-RELEASE. Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 17:24:24 GMT Message-ID: <3699df97.14510975@smtp.shellnet.co.uk> References: <199901101256.NAA16700@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> In-Reply-To: <199901101256.NAA16700@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 1.5/32.452 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by hub.freebsd.org id JAA14125 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Sun, 10 Jan 1999 13:56:32 +0100 (MET), you wrote: > >it is not unlikely that you are running out of MBUFS -- a dummynet pipe >uses up to 100 or more of them (depending on how you configure queue size >that is) so you need some option NMBCLUSTERS=some-high-value >to be safe. My kernel already has: maxusers 512 options "NMBCLUSTERS=9000" options IPFIREWALL options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE_LIMIT options IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT options DUMMYNET >of course it should not crash, and of course it would be great if you >could investigate more on the problem if it is easily reproducible for >you. I've tried really. The only trend I see is if it's being used, it crashes. If it' not being used, it's perfectly stable. >Another possible source of problems could be that buffers reference a >route (descriptor) Aha. Could this have anything to do with the errors I'm getting? Jan 9 13:11:48 freebsd /kernel: rtfree: 0xf4822a00 not freed (neg refs) I searched the mail archives, but found no real result about this. However, these errors don't usually happen near the crashes. Steven Fletcher - steven@shellnet.co.uk Shellnet - http://www.shellnet.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Sun Jan 10 09:56:00 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id JAA17727 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 09:56:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id JAA17721 for ; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 09:55:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it) Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id QAA17193; Sun, 10 Jan 1999 16:49:44 +0100 From: Luigi Rizzo Message-Id: <199901101549.QAA17193@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Subject: Re: IPFW, Dummynet under 2.2.8-RELEASE. To: steven@shellnet.co.uk (Steven Fletcher) Date: Sun, 10 Jan 1999 16:49:44 +0100 (MET) Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <3699df97.14510975@smtp.shellnet.co.uk> from "Steven Fletcher" at Jan 10, 99 05:24:05 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > >that is) so you need some option NMBCLUSTERS=3Dsome-high-value > >to be safe. > > My kernel already has: > > maxusers 512 > options "NMBCLUSTERS=3D9000" ok... > >Another possible source of problems could be that buffers reference a > >route (descriptor)=20 > > Aha. Could this have anything to do with the errors I'm getting? > > Jan 9 13:11:48 freebsd /kernel: rtfree: 0xf4822a00 not freed (neg > refs) yes this could be a source of problems. There are a couple of places in ip_dummynet.c where i manipulate the rt_refcnt field. I am doing this at splimp() so i don't think i can be a victim of some race condition. Perhaps you can try removing the decrease of the counter in dn_move(), near the lines below: case DN_TO_IP_OUT: { ... - if (tmp_rt) - tmp_rt->rt_refcnt--; /* XXX return a reference count */ could be that it results in some false release of route entries. (remove the lines marked with '-') If this is a fix the system should remain stable. If it is not, then you might see reference counts for such structures increase too much (with netstat -nr, probably the Refs field is what you need) > I searched the mail archives, but found no real result about this. If the problem is htere, dummynet is the only responsible. > However, these errors don't usually happen near the crashes. unfortunately the problem is that if dummynet makes reference counts incorrect, then a route could be silently freed right before it is used, and the actions on the not-existing-anymore rtentry can destroy some other piece of information. let me know if the above fixes problems. cheers luigi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jan 11 03:18:35 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id DAA17402 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 03:18:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id DAA17186 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 03:18:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it) Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id KAA19980; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 10:12:10 +0100 From: Luigi Rizzo Message-Id: <199901110912.KAA19980@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Subject: HEADS UP: critical dummynet patch To: net@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 10:12:09 +0100 (MET) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org This one is a critical fix for dummynet operation. Please update your copy of netinet/ip_dummynet.c or at least apply the following patch: diff -u -r1.3 -r1.4 --- ip_dummynet.c 1998/12/31 07:35:49 1.3 +++ ip_dummynet.c 1999/01/11 11:08:07 1.4 @@ -308,6 +318,7 @@ m_freem(m); return 0 ; /* XXX error */ } + bzero(pkt, sizeof(*pkt) ); /* build and enqueue packet */ pkt->hdr.mh_type = MT_DUMMYNET ; (struct ip_fw_chain *)pkt->hdr.mh_data = rule ; cheers luigi > From majordom@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 11 10:03:11 1999 > Delivered-To: vmailer-cvs-all@freebsd.org > From: Luigi Rizzo > Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 03:08:09 -0800 (PST) > Message-Id: <199901111108.DAA02953@freefall.freebsd.org> > To: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet ip_dummynet.c > Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG > Precedence: bulk > > luigi 1999/01/11 03:08:09 PST > > Modified files: > sys/netinet ip_dummynet.c > Log: > Add a missing bzero which could be the source of instability > problems reported recently (the rtentry pointer in the dummynet > queue was not initialized in all cases, resulting in spurious > rt_refcnt decreases in the lucky cases, and memory trashing in > other cases. > > Revision Changes Path > 1.4 +21 -12 src/sys/netinet/ip_dummynet.c > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jan 11 14:49:39 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA13030 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 14:49:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.barmentlo.net (gateway.barmentlo.net [194.158.173.249]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA13022 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 14:49:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pbm@barmentlo.net) Received: from localhost (pbm@localhost) by mail.barmentlo.net (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA00339 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 23:48:56 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 23:48:56 +0100 (CET) From: Patrick Barmentlo To: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: ipfw rules examples Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hai... Can someone please point me out to some good examples for the rc.firewall file (ipfw )?? (with most variant of opties/features...) i have to set up some filtering, but still having some difficulties with it after checking freebsd.org.... thanks patrick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jan 11 15:05:37 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA15088 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 15:05:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from Homer.Web-Ex.com ([209.54.66.254]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA15059 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 15:05:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jim@web-ex.com) Received: from localhost (jim@localhost) by Homer.Web-Ex.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA10011 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 18:56:21 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jim@web-ex.com) X-Authentication-Warning: Homer.Web-Ex.com: jim owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 18:56:21 -0500 (EST) From: Jim Cassata To: FreeBSD Net Subject: xntpd Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Dear FreeBSD Devotees, I am finding xntpd is quietly dying on my new workstation, a Tyan dual P2 with a real time clock chip that likes to gain almost 15 minutes a day. xntpd never died on my old workstation, a PPro dual, and I am mentioning this because all I did was pull the hard disk and scsi card from the old and put it into the new. (no new install or change of configuration) I have searched the handbook, faq, and archives with no luck. The good news is I am now always early for appointments :) Jim Cassata 516.421.6000 jim@web-ex.com Web Express 20 Broadhollow Road Suite 3011 Melville, NY 11747 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jan 11 16:44:46 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA28242 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 16:44:46 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from snowcrest.net (mtshasta.snowcrest.net [207.201.33.195]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA28237 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 16:44:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from djewett@snowcrest.net) Received: from ws2600 (ppp474.snowcrest.net [209.148.37.106]) by snowcrest.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA25067 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 16:44:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <00fd01be3dc4$87f2e740$0afea8c0@ws2600> From: "Derek Jewett" To: Subject: test Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 16:43:10 -0800 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org test To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jan 11 17:48:11 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA05961 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 17:48:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from snowcrest.net (mtshasta.snowcrest.net [207.201.33.195]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA05955 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 17:48:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from djewett@snowcrest.net) Received: from ws2600 (ppp456.snowcrest.net [209.148.37.88]) by snowcrest.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA28709 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 17:47:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <001501be3dcd$634a8250$0afea8c0@ws2600> From: "Derek Jewett" To: Subject: natd & ipfw on multiple segments Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 17:46:33 -0800 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Can ipfw be used to "secure" multiple segments on the same box..? As well can I use natd to translate multiple segments Example; I have my FBSD box sitting between four segments. Local segment 192.168.254.0/24 xl0 Courthouse 192.168.19.0/24 xl1 State connection 158.96.243.0/26 xl2 Internet 209.60.81.0/26 xl3 I want to secure the 158 and 209 segments, would I just define multiple oif's in rc.firewall? There is only one "outside interface" in the file now. As well I want to translate anything from the 192 segments (private ip's) to the 158 segment, and the 209 segment since these segments use registered addressing. Would I just run natd once for each Interface? i.e. natd -interface xl2 & natd -interface xl3 Thanks To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Mon Jan 11 20:14:18 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA22134 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 20:14:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.pinboard.com (mail.pinboard.com [194.209.195.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA22121 for ; Mon, 11 Jan 1999 20:14:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from HTS@pinboard.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by mail.pinboard.com (8.9.1/8.9.1/19980920-01/KK) with UUCP id FAA03917; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 05:13:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from: HTS@pinboard.com) Message-Id: <3.0.5.16.19990111225645.34877cb4@pinboard.com> Date: Mon, 11 Jan 1999 22:56:45 To: Miguel Sierra From: HTS Subject: Re: getting machine on internet Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org You mean you have the same gateway and DNS entries in the two machines which do not have a static IP? If so, it won't work. You'll need to act the machine which connects to the internet as a router/gateway. Below, box1, box2 and box3 are on the same internal network (192.168.x.x or so) and box3 additionally is configured with your fixed IP for connecting to the internet. box3 then should do IP aliasing and is the gateway for box1 and box2. How you set this when box3 is a Windows machine, I don't know. If box3 is the FreeBSD box, then the ppp configured correctly will work nicely. box1------------ \ ---box3====internet / box2------------ Kurt >I have 3 machines (2 windows and 1 freebsd). I have access via >CableModem to the internet. I have one static IP that my windows machine >needs to have it for me to get connected to the internet. However I have >a proxy server on this windows machine. I set up the gateway and the DNS >just like the windows machine, however I have a different IP in my >FreeBSD server. I know the hub works, I know the proxy works, I know my >IPs are fine in both machine. Everything works, except I can't see my >Windows machine (proxy) to get on internet. -- / / ------ /----/ / / / / /high/ tec samurai / / / / / / / /----/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Jan 12 06:29:40 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA26077 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 06:29:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from aaz.links.ru (aaz.links.ru [193.125.152.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA25850 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 06:29:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from babolo@aaz.links.ru) Received: (from babolo@localhost) by aaz.links.ru (8.9.1a/8.8.8) id RAA08316 for net@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 17:33:29 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from babolo) Message-Id: <199901121433.RAA08316@aaz.links.ru> Subject: HSRP or VRRP? To: net@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 17:33:29 +0300 (MSK) From: "Aleksandr A.Babaylov" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I wonder if is there any implementation of HSRP or VRRP on FreeBSD? -- @BABOLO http://links.ru/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Jan 12 08:45:15 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA10064 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 08:45:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from snowcrest.net (mtshasta.snowcrest.net [207.201.33.195]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA10058 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 08:45:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from djewett@snowcrest.net) Received: from ws2600 (ppp113.snowcrest.net [207.201.18.145]) by snowcrest.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id IAA16904 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 08:44:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <00b001be3e4a$b46bd3a0$0afea8c0@ws2600> From: "Derek Jewett" To: Subject: Static natd Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 08:42:51 -0800 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Has anyone setup natd for static translation?? I was wondering if anyone has set it up using mac addressess. Since I would like to address workstations using dhcp I am unable to get a consistant address translation for each machine, but the mac address is static. Thanks PS I have the disc1.img CD image, and I uploaded it to ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/incoming if anyone needs to download it To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Jan 12 10:32:17 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA22411 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 10:32:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from hp9000.chc-chimes.com (hp9000.chc-chimes.com [206.67.97.84]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA22403 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 10:32:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from billf@chc-chimes.com) Received: from localhost by hp9000.chc-chimes.com with SMTP (1.39.111.2/16.2) id AA169534817; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 07:40:17 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 07:40:17 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Fumerola To: Derek Jewett Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Static natd In-Reply-To: <00b001be3e4a$b46bd3a0$0afea8c0@ws2600> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 12 Jan 1999, Derek Jewett wrote: > PS I have the disc1.img CD image, and I uploaded it to > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/incoming if anyone needs to download it ...which is a write-only directory. If wcarchive wanted their bandwidth to be consumed in one swoop, the ISO's would have remained there. - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Jan 12 10:54:33 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA24782 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 10:54:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from snowcrest.net (mtshasta.snowcrest.net [207.201.33.195]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA24777 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 10:54:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from djewett@snowcrest.net) Received: from ws2600 (ppp440.snowcrest.net [209.148.37.72]) by snowcrest.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id KAA26571; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 10:53:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <000c01be3e5c$c3671a60$0afea8c0@ws2600> From: "Derek Jewett" To: "Bill Fumerola" Cc: Subject: Re: Static natd Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 10:52:53 -0800 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Well unlike yourself I was just trying to be helpfull, to people in need of the ISO images - if you have a better idea, hey why not post it here...? -----Original Message----- From: Bill Fumerola To: Derek Jewett Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Tuesday, January 12, 1999 10:31 AM Subject: Re: Static natd >On Tue, 12 Jan 1999, Derek Jewett wrote: > >> PS I have the disc1.img CD image, and I uploaded it to >> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/incoming if anyone needs to download it > >...which is a write-only directory. > >If wcarchive wanted their bandwidth to be consumed in one swoop, the ISO's >would have remained there. > >- bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - >- ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Jan 12 11:38:33 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA00125 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 11:38:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from hp9000.chc-chimes.com (hp9000.chc-chimes.com [206.67.97.84]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA00104 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 11:38:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from billf@chc-chimes.com) Received: from localhost by hp9000.chc-chimes.com with SMTP (1.39.111.2/16.2) id AA192058793; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 08:46:33 -0500 Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 08:46:33 -0500 (EST) From: Bill Fumerola To: Derek Jewett Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Static natd In-Reply-To: <000c01be3e5c$c3671a60$0afea8c0@ws2600> Message-Id: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Tue, 12 Jan 1999, Derek Jewett wrote: > Well unlike yourself I was just trying to be helpfull, to people in need of > the ISO images - if you have a better idea, hey why not post it here...? > >...which is a write-only directory. > > > >If wcarchive wanted their bandwidth to be consumed in one swoop, the ISO's > >would have remained there. Don't be a dumbshit, distributing ISOs was killing wcarchive's bandwidth. The incoming/ dir IS write-only, so you wasted your time. If we wanted ISO's to be there, they'd be there. A better idea? How about YOU provide a server that people can download ISOs off of. - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Jan 12 14:13:33 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA18566 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 14:13:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA18561 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 14:13:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA56094; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 14:12:21 -0800 (PST) To: Bill Fumerola cc: Derek Jewett , net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Static natd In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 12 Jan 1999 07:40:17 EST." Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 14:12:20 -0800 Message-ID: <55979.916179140@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > If wcarchive wanted their bandwidth to be consumed in one swoop, the ISO's > would have remained there. The problem was more than such users were taking up a lot of "FTP slots" since they had really looooong downloads. There are only 3600 FTP slots max and when you have between 200 and 300 people a day downloading the ISO images, as we did, it really plays hob with the traffic patterns and penalizes those who just want to jump in for one or two small files and then leave again. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Jan 12 14:15:21 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA19080 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 14:15:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (zippy.cdrom.com [204.216.27.228]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA19073 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 14:15:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jkh@zippy.cdrom.com) Received: from zippy.cdrom.com (localhost.cdrom.com [127.0.0.1]) by zippy.cdrom.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA83086; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 14:14:17 -0800 (PST) To: Bill Fumerola Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Static natd In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 12 Jan 1999 08:46:33 EST." Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 14:14:16 -0800 Message-ID: <82953.916179256@zippy.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Don't be a dumbshit, distributing ISOs was killing wcarchive's bandwidth. > The incoming/ dir IS write-only, so you wasted your time. If we wanted > ISO's to be there, they'd be there. Um, guys? Let's try and take just a LITTLE bit of extra time in expressing ourselves more carefully please? I don't think anybody who was trying to help, however misguidedly, deserves to be called a "dumbshit" and I don't like that kind of language on the public lists either - we've already had a rocky december in terms of interpersonal relations and this kinda thing doesn't help return us to sanity at all. Thanks. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Jan 12 17:26:42 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id RAA27521 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 17:26:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from snowcrest.net (mtshasta.snowcrest.net [207.201.33.195]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA27508 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 17:26:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from djewett@snowcrest.net) Received: from ws2600 (ppp539.snowcrest.net [205.215.229.139]) by snowcrest.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id RAA16429 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 17:26:04 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <000701be3e93$8cc751a0$0afea8c0@ws2600> From: "Derek Jewett" To: Subject: named.... "address already in use".. Help Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 17:25:04 -0800 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I am running 3.0-RELEASE on a Compaq proliant 3500 with 2 400mhz P5 cpu's, 320Mb RAM, 5 4.3 Gb scsi drives, four ethenrnet nics plus the on board tx0. I have a custom kernel compiled with the following options; ipdivert ipfirewall smb support I am trying to run named as a forwarder only. I followed the help in the named.conf file and enabled the forward only line. the forwarders line looks as below; forwarders 158.96.11.9 158.96.12.9 158.96.13.9 209.60.80.1 207.201.33.195 I enabled named=yes in the rc.conf, and followed steps in the man page. My resolv.conf has 127.0.0.1 as my DNS server. When I run named from the command line I get "address already in use", and it does not resolve host names... what am I doing wrong/forgetting?? Thanks! Derek Jewett Sr. Office Automation Consultant Shasta County IS - Core Services Redding, Ca To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Jan 12 19:19:28 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id TAA27136 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 19:19:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from snowcrest.net (mtshasta.snowcrest.net [207.201.33.195]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA27121 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 19:19:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from djewett@snowcrest.net) Received: from bsharp (ppp33.snowcrest.net [207.201.18.33]) by snowcrest.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA18735; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 19:18:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <002001be3ea4$2109c680$2112c9cf@bsharp.dubakella.tcoe.k12.ca.us> From: "Derek Jewett" To: "Derek Jewett" , Subject: Re: natd & ipfw on multiple segments UPDATE Date: Tue, 12 Jan 1999 19:23:44 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Through experimentation I have found it quite easy to use ipfw on multiple segments. In the rc.firewall file there is a oif="interface". This is a variable used in the rules defined in the rc.firewall file. To add interfaces I just made a oif1, oif2, oif3, oif4, etc... and then used these variables in the rules to apply the rules to multiple outside interfaces. and it works! email me for details if you're looking to do something like this... natd I am still working on as it has a natd_interface variable in the rc.conf file that is referenced in the rc.firewall file. Weather I can just make additional natd_interface variables I do not know. I am going to try just making a natd_interface1, 2, 3 etc.. and try it out. -----Original Message----- From: Derek Jewett To: net@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Monday, January 11, 1999 5:52 PM Subject: natd & ipfw on multiple segments >Can ipfw be used to "secure" multiple segments on the same box..? >As well can I use natd to translate multiple segments >Example; > >I have my FBSD box sitting between four segments. >Local segment 192.168.254.0/24 xl0 >Courthouse 192.168.19.0/24 xl1 >State connection 158.96.243.0/26 xl2 >Internet 209.60.81.0/26 xl3 > >I want to secure the 158 and 209 segments, would I just define multiple >oif's in rc.firewall? There is only one "outside interface" in the file now. > >As well I want to translate anything from the 192 segments (private ip's) to >the 158 segment, and the 209 segment since these segments use registered >addressing. Would I just run natd once for each Interface? i.e. >natd -interface xl2 > & >natd -interface xl3 > >Thanks > > > > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Tue Jan 12 23:26:28 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA09568 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 23:26:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ns11.nokia.com (ns11.nokia.com [131.228.6.230]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA09553 for ; Tue, 12 Jan 1999 23:26:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yu.shi@research.nokia.com) Received: from pepper.research.nokia.com (pepper.research.nokia.com [131.228.12.3]) by ns11.nokia.com (8.8.8/8.6.9) with ESMTP id JAA24616 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 09:25:47 +0200 (EET) Received: from pupu.research.nokia.com (pupu.research.nokia.com [131.228.13.130]) by pepper.research.nokia.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA21798 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 09:25:46 +0200 (EET) Received: from research.nokia.com ([172.28.31.90]) by pupu.research.nokia.com (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA15881 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 09:22:59 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <369C4A50.8EA01BB5@research.nokia.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 15:25:04 +0800 From: Shi Yu Reply-To: yu.shi@research.nokia.com Organization: Nokia China X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.02 [en] (Win95; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: piggy-backed ACKs Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In a TCP connection, who decides that ACKs are piggy-backed or not. IF I implement an application, can I make ACKs not piggy-backed? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jan 13 10:59:15 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id KAA00539 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 10:59:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail1.WorldMediaCo.com ([207.252.121.17]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA00477 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 10:59:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from opsys@open-systems.net) Received: from freebsd.omaha.com ([207.252.122.237]) by mail1.WorldMediaCo.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-55573U2500L250S0V35) with SMTP id com for ; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 08:27:40 -0600 Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 08:32:35 -0600 (CST) From: "Open Systems Inc." X-Sender: opsys@freebsd.omaha.com To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: QUESTION: FBSD + SQUID or FBSD + APACHE? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I am pondering the best way to boost performance at my new place of employment. They are a big NT shop *GAG*, but at least my boss is open to the idea of BSD. So here's the situation... We are moving to a new building in ~45 days. They have a NT web server farm of around 15 boxes. All the boxes sit on a switched ethernet network. The question I have is what would be faster and be the biggest performance boost: Squid doing caching + accelerating the NT web servers on FBSD of course, or Apache + Proxy/Caching module? Basically what im trying to do is pull the web content from the NT boxes over to a FBSD box and make the FBSD boxes do the actuall serving because they will obviously perform alot better. But some of the sites on the NT boxes are not static they are dynamic, like feeds from AP news wire and such. I would really be interested in ideas and thoughts on this. Whats the best way to go about doing this kind of scheme? Thanks, Chris -- ===================================| Open Systems FreeBSD Consulting. FreeBSD 2.2.8 is available now! | Phone: 402-573-9124 -----------------------------------| 3335 N. 103 Plaza #14, Omaha, NE 68134 FreeBSD: The power to serve! | E-Mail: opsys@open-systems.net http://www.freebsd.org | Consulting, Network Engineering, Security ===================================| http://open-systems.net -----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: 2.6.2 mQENAzPemUsAAAEH/06iF0BU8pMtdLJrxp/lLk3vg9QJCHajsd25gYtR8X1Px1Te gWU0C4EwMh4seDIgK9bzFmjjlZOEgS9zEgia28xDgeluQjuuMyUFJ58MzRlC2ONC foYIZsFyIqdjEOCBdfhH5bmgB5/+L5bjDK6lNdqD8OAhtC4Xnc1UxAKq3oUgVD/Z d5UJXU2xm+f08WwGZIUcbGcaonRC/6Z/5o8YpLVBpcFeLtKW5WwGhEMxl9WDZ3Kb NZH6bx15WiB2Q/gZQib3ZXhe1xEgRP+p6BnvF364I/To9kMduHpJKU97PH3dU7Mv CXk2NG3rtOgLTEwLyvtBPqLnbx35E0JnZc0k5YkABRO0JU9wZW4gU3lzdGVtcyA8 b3BzeXNAb3Blbi1zeXN0ZW1zLm5ldD4= =BBjp -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jan 13 11:11:09 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA03689 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 11:11:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from obie.softweyr.com ([204.68.178.33]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA03629 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 11:10:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from softweyr.com (zaphod.softweyr.com [204.68.178.35]) by obie.softweyr.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA05825; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 08:48:11 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Message-ID: <369CC03B.FD3F4191@softweyr.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 08:48:11 -0700 From: Wes Peters Organization: Softweyr llc X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 3.0-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Derek Jewett CC: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: named.... "address already in use".. Help References: <000701be3e93$8cc751a0$0afea8c0@ws2600> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Derek Jewett wrote: > > I am running 3.0-RELEASE on a Compaq proliant 3500 with 2 400mhz P5 cpu's, > 320Mb RAM, 5 4.3 Gb scsi drives, four ethenrnet nics plus the on board tx0. > I have a custom kernel compiled with the following options; > ipdivert > ipfirewall > smb support > > I am trying to run named as a forwarder only. I followed the help in the > named.conf file and enabled the forward only line. the forwarders line looks > as below; > > forwarders 158.96.11.9 158.96.12.9 158.96.13.9 209.60.80.1 207.201.33.195 > > I enabled named=yes in the rc.conf, and followed steps in the man page. My > resolv.conf has 127.0.0.1 as my DNS server. When I run named from the > command line I get "address already in use", and it does not resolve host > names... what am I doing wrong/forgetting?? Do you already have a named running? Something has already bound to the nameserver TCP or UDP ports. If you already have a named running, just send it a HUP to tell it to reread the configuration. -- "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" Wes Peters Softweyr LLC http://www.softweyr.com/~softweyr wes@softweyr.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jan 13 11:24:09 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA07702 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 11:24:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from snowcrest.net (mtshasta.snowcrest.net [207.201.33.195]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA07575 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 11:23:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from djewett@snowcrest.net) Received: from ws2600 (ppp487.snowcrest.net [209.148.37.135]) by snowcrest.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id IAA11728; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 08:29:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <007b01be3f11$ce174ce0$0afea8c0@ws2600> From: "Derek Jewett" To: "Wes Peters" Cc: Subject: Re: named.... "address already in use".. Help Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 08:28:50 -0800 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I do indeed have named running... So it seems that it is executing on bootup which is good. But I still do not get address resolution. I tested by attempting to ping one of our hosts : "ping shastaa" So I am assuming that my setup is incorect as it does not forward the request to the forwarders. In resolv.conf I have 127.0.0.1 as my DNS entry, so I have it pointed to itself. and as I mentioned I hae the forwarders line setup, and I uncommented the forward only; line. According to the man page this is all you need to do. As well I am able to ping the forwarders by IP, as well as the hosts, just not by hostname. Thanks -----Original Message----- From: Wes Peters To: Derek Jewett Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Wednesday, January 13, 1999 7:48 AM Subject: Re: named.... "address already in use".. Help >Derek Jewett wrote: >> >> I am running 3.0-RELEASE on a Compaq proliant 3500 with 2 400mhz P5 cpu's, >> 320Mb RAM, 5 4.3 Gb scsi drives, four ethenrnet nics plus the on board tx0. >> I have a custom kernel compiled with the following options; >> ipdivert >> ipfirewall >> smb support >> >> I am trying to run named as a forwarder only. I followed the help in the >> named.conf file and enabled the forward only line. the forwarders line looks >> as below; >> >> forwarders 158.96.11.9 158.96.12.9 158.96.13.9 209.60.80.1 207.201.33.195 >> >> I enabled named=yes in the rc.conf, and followed steps in the man page. My >> resolv.conf has 127.0.0.1 as my DNS server. When I run named from the >> command line I get "address already in use", and it does not resolve host >> names... what am I doing wrong/forgetting?? > >Do you already have a named running? Something has already bound to >the nameserver TCP or UDP ports. If you already have a named running, >just send it a HUP to tell it to reread the configuration. > >-- > "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?" > >Wes Peters Softweyr LLC >http://www.softweyr.com/~softweyr wes@softweyr.com > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jan 13 11:28:09 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA08923 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 11:28:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from news.third-rail.net (mail2.third-rail.net [208.153.2.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA08863 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 11:27:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from psion@geekspace.com) Received: from geekspace.com ([208.154.207.44]) by news.third-rail.net (Post.Office MTA v3.1.2 release (PO205-101c) ID# 0-44653U100L2S100) with ESMTP id AAA184 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 10:15:31 -0500 Message-ID: <369CB914.15FB09EE@geekspace.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 10:17:40 -0500 From: Chris Williams X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; I) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: ARCserver client agent Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Has anyone successfully used the ARCserve client agent with FreeBSD 2.2.x? I have tried both the BSDI version (which always has child processes die unexpectedly as soon as a backup starts) and the Linux version (which apparently does not check passwords correctly). To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jan 13 11:46:39 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA13328 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 11:46:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu [18.24.4.193]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA13316 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 11:46:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu) Received: (from wollman@localhost) by khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id KAA21921; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 10:25:16 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wollman) Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 10:25:16 -0500 (EST) From: Garrett Wollman Message-Id: <199901131525.KAA21921@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> To: yu.shi@research.nokia.com Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: piggy-backed ACKs In-Reply-To: <369C4A50.8EA01BB5@research.nokia.com> References: <369C4A50.8EA01BB5@research.nokia.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org < said: > In a TCP connection, who decides that ACKs are piggy-backed or not. The TCP stack will always try to send data when it sends an ack if there is data to be sent and the flow-control algorithms would permit data to be sent. > IF I implement an application, can I make ACKs not piggy-backed? Only if you rewrite the TCP stack. -GAWollman -- Garrett A. Wollman | O Siem / We are all family / O Siem / We're all the same wollman@lcs.mit.edu | O Siem / The fires of freedom Opinions not those of| Dance in the burning flame MIT, LCS, CRS, or NSA| - Susan Aglukark and Chad Irschick To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jan 13 11:47:00 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id LAA13396 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 11:47:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from smtp03.wxs.nl (smtp03.wxs.nl [195.121.6.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id LAA13343 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 11:46:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from asmodai@wxs.nl) Received: from daemon.ninth-circle.org ([195.121.56.150]) by smtp03.wxs.nl (Netscape Messaging Server 3.6) with ESMTP id AAA4648; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 20:45:12 +0100 Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 20:52:55 +0100 (CET) Organization: Ninth Circle Enterprises From: Jeroen Ruigrok/Asmodai To: "Open Systems Inc." Subject: RE: QUESTION: FBSD + SQUID or FBSD + APACHE? Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On 13-Jan-99 Open Systems Inc. wrote: > We are moving to a new building in ~45 days. They have a NT web > server farm of around 15 boxes. All the boxes sit on a switched ethernet > network. The question I have is what would be faster and be the biggest > performance boost: Squid doing caching + accelerating the NT web servers > on FBSD of course, or Apache + Proxy/Caching module? > Basically what im trying to do is pull the web content from the NT > boxes over to a FBSD box and make the FBSD boxes do the actuall serving > because they will obviously perform alot better. Go with Apache and a caching module, as Squid is purely based on caching HTTP data and not really serving this data, whereas Apache is a pure HTTPd. --- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven A veil of smoke is what I am, asmodai(at)wxs.nl I wait and I wait... Network/Security Specialist BSD & picoBSD: The Power to Serve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jan 13 12:20:23 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA21430 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 12:20:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.rwth-aachen.de (mail.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.144.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id MAA21387 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 12:20:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from heinig@hdz-ima.rwth-aachen.de) Received: from HDZ-IMA.RWTH-Aachen.de (majestix.hdz-ima.RWTH-Aachen.DE) by mail.rwth-aachen.de (PMDF V5.1-12 #30440) with ESMTP id <01J6I3DCA63U00069V@mail.rwth-aachen.de> for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 18:46:56 +0100 Received: from MAJESTIX/MAIL by HDZ-IMA.RWTH-Aachen.de (Mercury 1.20); Wed, 13 Jan 1999 18:51:09 +0000 Received: from MAIL by MAJESTIX (Mercury 1.20); Wed, 13 Jan 1999 18:51:00 +0000 Received: from hdz-ima.rwth-aachen.de by HDZ-IMA.RWTH-Aachen.de (Mercury 1.20) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 18:50:54 +0000 Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 18:48:34 +0100 From: Gerald Heinig Subject: ATM card drivers To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Message-id: <369CDC72.BF6BB447@hdz-ima.rwth-aachen.de> Organization: Informatik im Maschinenbau / Hochschuldidaktisches Zentrum, RWTH Aachen MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.7-RELEASE i386) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi all, I'm new to this group and new to ATM as well. I hope I'm correct here... I just wanted to ask if anyone knows of a driver for the Fore SBA 200E PCI ATM card. Thanks Gerald -- "A man's got to know his limitations..." 'Dirty' Harry Callaghan A.K.A Clint Eastwood To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jan 13 12:29:30 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id MAA23936 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 12:29:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from alpha.xerox.com (alpha.Xerox.COM [13.1.64.93]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id MAA23926 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 12:29:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from fenner@parc.xerox.com) Received: from crevenia.parc.xerox.com ([13.2.116.11]) by alpha.xerox.com with SMTP id <62443(2)>; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 12:28:08 PST Received: from localhost by crevenia.parc.xerox.com with SMTP id <177534>; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 12:27:56 -0800 To: Jim Cassata cc: FreeBSD Net Subject: Re: xntpd In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 11 Jan 99 15:56:21 PST." Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 12:27:54 PST From: Bill Fenner Message-Id: <99Jan13.122756pst.177534@crevenia.parc.xerox.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Have you looked at /var/log/messages to see if xntpd is logging something before it dies? If you have a drift file, (like /etc/ntp.drift) you might need to remove it so that ntp tries recalculating the clock's drift. You may even need to hotwire it to some value that's somewhere close to your drift, but I don't know how to do that. Bill To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jan 13 13:30:12 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA04704 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 13:30:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.rwth-aachen.de (mail.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.144.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA04603 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 13:29:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from heinig@hdz-ima.rwth-aachen.de) Received: from HDZ-IMA.RWTH-Aachen.de (majestix.hdz-ima.RWTH-Aachen.DE) by mail.rwth-aachen.de (PMDF V5.1-12 #30440) with ESMTP id <01J6IB2B80CE000876@mail.rwth-aachen.de> for freebsd-net@freebsd.org; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 22:27:07 +0100 Received: from MAJESTIX/MAIL by HDZ-IMA.RWTH-Aachen.de (Mercury 1.20); Wed, 13 Jan 1999 22:31:20 +0000 Received: from MAIL by MAJESTIX (Mercury 1.20); Wed, 13 Jan 1999 22:31:19 +0000 Received: from hdz-ima.rwth-aachen.de by HDZ-IMA.RWTH-Aachen.de (Mercury 1.20) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 22:31:15 +0000 Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 22:28:55 +0100 From: Gerald Heinig Subject: [Fwd: ATM card drivers] To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Message-id: <369D1017.CC2207FD@hdz-ima.rwth-aachen.de> Organization: Informatik im Maschinenbau / Hochschuldidaktisches Zentrum, RWTH Aachen MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.7-RELEASE i386) Content-type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------80B753159E549A9C64AB6383" X-Accept-Language: en Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------80B753159E549A9C64AB6383 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -- "A man's got to know his limitations..." 'Dirty' Harry Callaghan A.K.A Clint Eastwood --------------80B753159E549A9C64AB6383 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Message-ID: <369CDC72.BF6BB447@hdz-ima.rwth-aachen.de> Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 18:48:34 +0100 From: Gerald Heinig Organization: Informatik im Maschinenbau / Hochschuldidaktisches Zentrum, RWTH Aachen X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.7-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: ATM card drivers Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi all, I'm new to this group and new to ATM as well. I hope I'm correct here... I just wanted to ask if anyone knows of a driver for the Fore SBA 200E PCI ATM card. Thanks Gerald -- "A man's got to know his limitations..." 'Dirty' Harry Callaghan A.K.A Clint Eastwood --------------80B753159E549A9C64AB6383-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jan 13 15:05:10 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA17538 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 15:05:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from marcos.networkcs.com (marcos.networkcs.com [137.66.16.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA17533 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 15:05:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mks@us.networkcs.com) Received: from us.networkcs.com (us.networkcs.com [137.66.11.15]) by marcos.networkcs.com (8.9.0.Beta5/8.9.0.Beta5) with ESMTP id RAA03860; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 17:03:59 -0600 (CST) Received: (from mks@localhost) by us.networkcs.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA13135; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 17:03:57 -0600 (CST) From: Mike Spengler Message-Id: <199901132303.RAA13135@us.networkcs.com> Subject: Re: ATM card drivers In-Reply-To: <369CDC72.BF6BB447@hdz-ima.rwth-aachen.de> from Gerald Heinig at "Jan 13, 99 06:48:34 pm" To: heinig@hdz-ima.rwth-aachen.de (Gerald Heinig) Date: Wed, 13 Jan 1999 17:03:57 -0600 (CST) Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Gerald Heinig said: > > I'm new to this group and new to ATM as well. I hope I'm correct here... > I just wanted to ask if anyone knows of a driver for the Fore SBA 200E > PCI ATM card. > Yes, there is support for the FORE PCA-200E (the SBA-200E is the SBus version) in FreeBSD 3. Take a look in /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/LINT (search for HARP) for the kernel config options needed. Also see rc.conf(5) for /etc/rc.conf ATM configuration options. See atm(8) and /usr/share/examples/atm for some more information that may be useful. For FreeBSD 2.2.x support for the PCA-200E, you should head over to http://www.msci.magic.net/harp/. -- Mike Spengler Network Computing Services, Inc. Email: mks@networkcs.com 1200 Washington Ave. So. Phone: +1 612 337 3557 Minneapolis MN 55415 FAX: +1 612 337 3400 (aka Minnesota Supercomputer Center) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Wed Jan 13 16:07:00 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA25410 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 16:07:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from mail.rwth-aachen.de (mail.RWTH-Aachen.DE [137.226.144.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA25401 for ; Wed, 13 Jan 1999 16:06:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from heinig@hdz-ima.rwth-aachen.de) Received: from HDZ-IMA.RWTH-Aachen.de (majestix.hdz-ima.RWTH-Aachen.DE) by mail.rwth-aachen.de (PMDF V5.1-12 #30440) with ESMTP id <01J6IGKCFKO80007G8@mail.rwth-aachen.de> for freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 01:04:25 +0100 Received: from MAJESTIX/MAIL by HDZ-IMA.RWTH-Aachen.de (Mercury 1.20); Thu, 14 Jan 1999 01:08:39 +0000 Received: from MAIL by MAJESTIX (Mercury 1.20); Thu, 14 Jan 1999 01:08:32 +0000 Received: from hdz-ima.rwth-aachen.de by HDZ-IMA.RWTH-Aachen.de (Mercury 1.20) with ESMTP; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 01:08:31 +0000 Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 01:06:11 +0100 From: Gerald Heinig Subject: Re: ATM card drivers To: Mike Spengler Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Message-id: <369D34F3.9B5D4AAD@hdz-ima.rwth-aachen.de> Organization: Informatik im Maschinenbau / Hochschuldidaktisches Zentrum, RWTH Aachen MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; I; FreeBSD 2.2.7-RELEASE i386) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en References: <199901132303.RAA13135@us.networkcs.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Mike Spengler wrote: > > Gerald Heinig said: > > > > I'm new to this group and new to ATM as well. I hope I'm correct here... > > I just wanted to ask if anyone knows of a driver for the Fore SBA 200E > > PCI ATM card. > > > Yes, there is support for the FORE PCA-200E (the SBA-200E is the SBus version) > in FreeBSD 3. Take a look in /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/LINT (search for HARP) > for the kernel config options needed. Also see rc.conf(5) for /etc/rc.conf > ATM configuration options. See atm(8) and /usr/share/examples/atm > for some more information that may be useful. > > For FreeBSD 2.2.x support for the PCA-200E, you should head over to > http://www.msci.magic.net/harp/. > Thanks very much indeed for your replies. I'll stroll on over to freebsd-atm :-) Gerald -- "A man's got to know his limitations..." 'Dirty' Harry Callaghan A.K.A Clint Eastwood To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Jan 14 01:18:03 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA12133 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 01:18:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id BAA12094; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 01:17:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it) Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id IAA28966; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 08:12:03 +0100 From: Luigi Rizzo Message-Id: <199901140712.IAA28966@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Subject: rl.c patches for bridging To: wpaul@FreeBSD.ORG, net@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 08:12:03 +0100 (MET) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Here are patches for the "rl" driver for bridging. I have tried them on a 2.2.x version of the driver and they seem to work (the first set of #include's may be a 2.2.x'ism because of the mislocation of things like ETHERMTU etc, i am going to try this on 3.x to see how it works. cheers luigi --- src/sys/pci/if_rl.c Thu Dec 24 19:39:48 1998 +++ /sys/pci/if_rl.c Thu Jan 14 07:43:58 1999 @@ -99,16 +99,23 @@ #include #include +#include +#include +#include +#include +#include + #if NBPFILTER > 0 #include #endif +#ifdef BRIDGE +#include +#endif + #include /* for vtophys */ #include /* for vtophys */ #include /* for DELAY */ @@ -1392,17 +1438,37 @@ * a broadcast packet, multicast packet, matches our ethernet * address or the interface is in promiscuous mode. */ - if (ifp->if_bpf) { + if (ifp->if_bpf) bpf_mtap(ifp, m); +#endif +#ifdef BRIDGE + if (do_bridge) { + struct ifnet *bdg_ifp ; + bdg_ifp = bridge_in(m); + if (bdg_ifp == BDG_DROP) + goto dropit; + else { + if (bdg_ifp != BDG_LOCAL) + bdg_forward(&m, bdg_ifp); + if (!m) + goto dropit ; + if (bdg_ifp == BDG_LOCAL || bdg_ifp == BDG_BCAST || + bdg_ifp == BDG_MCAST) + goto getit ; + else if (m) + goto dropit ; + } + } else +#endif if (ifp->if_flags & IFF_PROMISC && (bcmp(eh->ether_dhost, sc->arpcom.ac_enaddr, ETHER_ADDR_LEN) && (eh->ether_dhost[0] & 1) == 0)) { +dropit: m_freem(m); continue; } - } -#endif +getit: /* Remove header from mbuf and pass it on. */ m_adj(m, sizeof(struct ether_header)); ether_input(ifp, eh, m); To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Jan 14 08:42:47 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA26560 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 08:42:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from abused.com (abused.com [204.216.142.63]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA26555 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 08:42:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gvbmail@tns.net) Received: from gvb (gvb.tns.net [204.216.245.137]) by abused.com (8.9.1a/I feel abused.) with SMTP id IAA18055 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 08:42:29 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <4.1.19990114083945.00a60a60@abused.com> X-Sender: gvbmail@mail.tns.net (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 4.1 Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 08:41:52 -0800 To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG From: GVB Subject: Radius Solution Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi there... My boss has tasked me with getting rid of NT as our dialin radius server. I told him that I could do a number of free implementations, but he wants a commercial radius software that will run on freebsd... he wants pay because if I am not here to fix it, he needs a tech support number as well as things like web logs or adduser scripts, etc... just wanted to get some recommendations, or lists of the available commercial radius software for freebsd... I havnt been able to really find any yet.. Thanks.. GVB To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Jan 14 13:42:11 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id NAA13415 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 13:42:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from smtp4.erols.com (smtp4.erols.com [207.172.3.237]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA13374 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 13:42:06 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from shmit@natasya.noc.erols.net) Received: from natasya.noc.erols.net (natasya.noc.erols.net [207.172.25.236]) by smtp4.erols.com (8.8.8/smtp-v1) with ESMTP id QAA12077; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 16:40:54 -0500 (EST) Received: (from shmit@localhost) by natasya.noc.erols.net (8.9.1/8.9.1) id QAA31911; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 16:40:54 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <19990114164054.U325@kublai.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 16:40:54 -0500 From: Brian Cully To: GVB , freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Radius Solution Reply-To: shmit@kublai.com References: <4.1.19990114083945.00a60a60@abused.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93.2i In-Reply-To: <4.1.19990114083945.00a60a60@abused.com>; from GVB on Thu, Jan 14, 1999 at 08:41:52AM -0800 X-Sender: If your mailer pays attention to this, it's broken. X-PGP-Info: finger shmit@kublai.com for my public key. Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, Jan 14, 1999 at 08:41:52AM -0800, GVB wrote: > Hi there... My boss has tasked me with getting rid of NT as our dialin > radius server. I told him that I could do a number of free > implementations, but he wants a commercial radius software that will run on > freebsd... he wants pay because if I am not here to fix it, he needs a > tech support number as well as things like web logs or adduser scripts, > etc... just wanted to get some recommendations, or lists of the available > commercial radius software for freebsd... I havnt been able to really find > any yet.. I believe Pario Software's Port Authority product runs on FreeBSD. Check out http://www.pariosoftware.com/ -- Brian Cully ``I'm not surprised,'' said I. ``You created God in your own image, and when you found out he was no good you abolished him. It's quite a common form of psychological suicide.'' -- Robertson Davies, Fifth Buisiness To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Jan 14 14:46:10 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id OAA21976 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 14:46:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from snowcrest.net (mtshasta.snowcrest.net [207.201.33.195]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA21971 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 14:46:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from djewett@snowcrest.net) Received: from ws2600 (ppp143.snowcrest.net [207.201.18.175]) by snowcrest.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id OAA28438 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 14:44:59 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <001b01be400f$603892c0$0afea8c0@ws2600> From: "Derek Jewett" To: Subject: Static routes at boot.... Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 14:43:57 -0800 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org What is the best way to add static routes at boot time..? Currently I just added a line in my rc.local like below; route -n add -net 158.96.87.64/26 158.96.243.1 this works, but I saw a "routes" section in the rc.conf file that states it is for a static route list? Has anyone made entries into this field? I was just curious what the syntax is... Thanks Today is Syntax 101 for me! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Jan 14 15:28:56 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA01129 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 15:28:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from xylan.com (postal.xylan.com [208.8.0.248]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA01122 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 15:28:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wes@softweyr.com) Received: from mailhub.xylan.com by xylan.com (8.8.7/SMI-SVR4 (xylan-mgw 2.2 [OUT])) id PAA27533; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 15:27:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from utah.XYLAN.COM by mailhub.xylan.com (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4 (mailhub 2.1 [HUB])) id PAA01790; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 15:27:04 -0800 Received: from softweyr.com by utah.XYLAN.COM (SMI-8.6/SMI-SVR4 (xylan utah [SPOOL])) id QAA25838; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 16:27:03 -0700 Message-ID: <369E7D47.CE8FCDF0@softweyr.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 16:27:03 -0700 From: Wes Peters Organization: Softweyr LLC X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 2.2.7-RELEASE i386) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: GVB CC: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Radius Solution References: <4.1.19990114083945.00a60a60@abused.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org GVB wrote: > > Hi there... My boss has tasked me with getting rid of NT as our dialin > radius server. I told him that I could do a number of free > implementations, but he wants a commercial radius software that will run on > freebsd... he wants pay because if I am not here to fix it, he needs a > tech support number as well as things like web logs or adduser scripts, > etc... just wanted to get some recommendations, or lists of the available > commercial radius software for freebsd... I havnt been able to really find > any yet.. If you find one and evaluate it, let me know. I'd like to help you write an evaluation article for Daemon News. -- Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket? Wes Peters +1.801.915.2061 Softweyr LLC wes@softweyr.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Jan 14 15:31:02 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA01348 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 15:31:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from snowcrest.net (mtshasta.snowcrest.net [207.201.33.195]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA01332 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 15:31:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from djewett@snowcrest.net) Received: from ws2600 (ppp233.snowcrest.net [207.201.19.105]) by snowcrest.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA24561 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 15:29:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <002601be4015$9e7cc320$0afea8c0@ws2600> From: "Derek Jewett" To: Subject: Fw: named.conf syntax help Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 15:28:39 -0800 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.2106.4 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.2106.4 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org I thought I would forward this to the list as I found it EXTREEMLY helpfull for configuring named. FYI Kudos to Jt -----Original Message----- From: Jt To: Derek Jewett Date: Thursday, January 14, 1999 1:33 PM Subject: Re: named.conf syntax help > >To use the script yes it is perl > >copy named.boot over to tmp along with named-bootconf.pl > >./named-bootconf.pl named.boot > named.conf > >will make the named.conf then copy the named.conf over to etc or >where you have rc.conf calling it from. > >You need perl on your system to use the script. > >Goodluck.. > > > > >On Thu, 14 Jan 1999, Derek Jewett wrote: > >> I found a named-bootconf in /usr/sbin it looks like a perl script...? Is >> there a man page how to make a new named.conf file using this script by >> chance..? >> >> Thanks >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Jt >> To: Derek Jewett >> Date: Thursday, January 14, 1999 11:52 AM >> Subject: Re: named.conf syntax help >> >> >> > >> >If you installed bind8 or have the source. here are the dir >> > >> >/usr/local/bin/named-bootconf.pl > > >> >/usr/src/contrib/bind/bin/named/named-bootconf.pl > >source. >> > >> > >> > >> >On Thu, 14 Jan 1999, Derek Jewett wrote: >> > >> >> No I have been editing it directly with vi.... ? where is this >> >> named-bootconf.pl...? >> >> >> >> thanks for the reply >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: Jt >> >> To: Thomas Hrdina >> >> Cc: Derek Jewett ; questions@FreeBSD.ORG >> >> >> >> Date: Thursday, January 14, 1999 4:33 AM >> >> Subject: Re: named.conf syntax help >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >You using named-bootconf.pl to generate the named.conf ? >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >On Wed, 13 Jan 1999, Thomas Hrdina wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> hi derek, >> >> >> >> >> >> here's a copy of one that works: >> >> >> ======================= >> >> >> directory /var/named >> >> >> >> >> >> cache . db.cache >> >> >> primary ops.nya.ScotiaBank.com db.ops >> >> >> primary 0.0.127.IN-ADDR.ARPA db.127.0.0 >> >> >> primary 35.188.199.IN-ADDR.ARPA db.199.188.35 >> >> >> primary 37.188.199.IN-ADDR.ARPA db.199.188.37 >> >> >> primary 38.188.199.IN-ADDR.ARPA db.199.188.38 >> >> >> primary 39.188.199.IN-ADDR.ARPA db.199.188.39 >> >> >> primary 40.188.199.IN-ADDR.ARPA db.199.188.40 >> >> >> primary 111.168.192.IN-ADDR.ARPA db.192.168.111 >> >> >> forwarders 192.9.48.1 199.85.185.110 >> >> >> slave >> >> >> >> >> >> ========================================== >> >> >> >> >> >> Derek Jewett wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> > I have my named server up and going finaly! >> >> >> > >> >> >> > I have it set up as a forwarder only, and it works great. My problem >> is >> >> I >> >> >> > want to add four DNS forwarders in my named.conf file. I have tried >> add >> >> more >> >> >> > addresses but I either get a syntax error, or no name resolution at >> >> all. In >> >> >> > other words I get nslookup errors when I try to lookup a host. If >> >> anyone >> >> >> > know the correct syntax (one that works) please post, thanks! >> >> >> > >> >> >> > PS I have already tried; >> >> >> > forwarders 158.96.11.9 158.96.12.9 158.96.13.9 209.60.80.1 >> >> 207.201.33.195 >> >> >> > this didn't create a syntax error, but nslookup did not resolve >> >> hostnames >> >> >> > >> >> >> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >> >> >> > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >> >> >> with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >> >> >with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Jan 14 15:51:05 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id PAA04354 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 15:51:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from marcos.networkcs.com (marcos.networkcs.com [137.66.16.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA04349 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 15:51:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mks@us.networkcs.com) Received: from us.networkcs.com (us.networkcs.com [137.66.11.15]) by marcos.networkcs.com (8.9.0.Beta5/8.9.0.Beta5) with ESMTP id RAA12896; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 17:49:51 -0600 (CST) Received: (from mks@localhost) by us.networkcs.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA02728; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 17:49:49 -0600 (CST) From: Mike Spengler Message-Id: <199901142349.RAA02728@us.networkcs.com> Subject: Re: Static routes at boot.... In-Reply-To: <001b01be400f$603892c0$0afea8c0@ws2600> from Derek Jewett at "Jan 14, 99 02:43:57 pm" To: djewett@snowcrest.net (Derek Jewett) Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 17:49:49 -0600 (CST) Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL32 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Derek Jewett said: > What is the best way to add static routes at boot time..? Currently I just > added a line in my rc.local like below; > > route -n add -net 158.96.87.64/26 158.96.243.1 > > this works, but I saw a "routes" section in the rc.conf file that states it > is for a static route list? Has anyone made entries into this field? I was > just curious what the syntax is... Thanks > > For your example, put these lines into rc.conf: static_routes="somewhere" route_somewhere="-net 158.96.87.64/26 158.96.243.1" Although the "-n" option won't be set... -- Mike Spengler Network Computing Services, Inc. Email: mks@networkcs.com 1200 Washington Ave. So. Phone: +1 612 337 3557 Minneapolis MN 55415 FAX: +1 612 337 3400 (aka Minnesota Supercomputer Center) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Jan 14 16:43:42 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA13892 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 16:43:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from hawaii.conterra.com (hawaii.conterra.com [209.12.164.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA13883 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 16:43:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from myself@conterra.com) Received: from dmaddox.conterra.com (dmaddox.conterra.com [209.12.169.48]) by hawaii.conterra.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA29508; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 19:42:28 -0500 (EST) Received: (from myself@localhost) by dmaddox.conterra.com (8.9.1/8.9.1) id TAA06163; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 19:42:23 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from myself) Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 19:42:22 -0500 From: "Donald J . Maddox" To: Derek Jewett Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Static routes at boot.... Message-ID: <19990114194222.A6120@dmaddox.conterra.com> Reply-To: dmaddox@conterra.com References: <001b01be400f$603892c0$0afea8c0@ws2600> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95i In-Reply-To: <001b01be400f$603892c0$0afea8c0@ws2600>; from Derek Jewett on Thu, Jan 14, 1999 at 02:43:57PM -0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Thu, Jan 14, 1999 at 02:43:57PM -0800, Derek Jewett wrote: > What is the best way to add static routes at boot time..? Currently I just > added a line in my rc.local like below; > > route -n add -net 158.96.87.64/26 158.96.243.1 > > this works, but I saw a "routes" section in the rc.conf file that states it > is for a static route list? Has anyone made entries into this field? I was > just curious what the syntax is... Thanks > > Today is Syntax 101 for me! For each route you want to add, put a name in the static routes list in rc.conf, followed by a route_ line for each, like this: static_routes="net1 net2 host1" route_net1="-net 158.96.87.64/26 158.96.243.1" route_net2="-net 224.0.0.0/8 158.96.243.1" route_host1="158.96.243.12 158.96.243.7" You can learn more by looking at /etc/rc.network and seeing how it's actually done... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Thu Jan 14 18:51:19 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id SAA00199 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 18:51:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from enaila.nidlink.com (enaila.nidlink.com [216.18.128.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id SAA00194 for ; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 18:51:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sworkman@nidlink.com) Received: from hal.nidlink.com (pm3d2-42.nidlink.com [216.18.131.97]) by enaila.nidlink.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA05655; Thu, 14 Jan 1999 18:49:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: X-Mailer: XFMail 1.3 [p0] on FreeBSD X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4.1.19990114083945.00a60a60@abused.com> Date: Thu, 14 Jan 1999 18:51:24 -0800 (PST) Reply-To: sworkman@nidlink.com From: Shawn Workman To: GVB Subject: RE: Radius Solution Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org There is a version of Radius called Radius NT that I think is being ported to FreeBSD/Linux it has some pretty neat features like concurrency checks etc... I will see if I can find some more info for you.. On 14-Jan-99 GVB wrote: > Hi there... My boss has tasked me with getting rid of NT as our dialin > radius server. I told him that I could do a number of free > implementations, but he wants a commercial radius software that will run on > freebsd... he wants pay because if I am not here to fix it, he needs a > tech support number as well as things like web logs or adduser scripts, > etc... just wanted to get some recommendations, or lists of the available > commercial radius software for freebsd... I havnt been able to really find > any yet.. > > Thanks.. > > > GVB > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message ---------------------------------- E-Mail: Shawn Workman Date: 14-Jan-99 Time: 18:50:06 This message was sent by XFMail ---------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-net Fri Jan 15 05:06:32 1999 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id FAA11285 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Fri, 15 Jan 1999 05:06:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from labinfo.iet.unipi.it (labinfo.iet.unipi.it [131.114.9.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id FAA11279 for ; Fri, 15 Jan 1999 05:06:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it) Received: from localhost (luigi@localhost) by labinfo.iet.unipi.it (8.6.5/8.6.5) id LAA02067; Fri, 15 Jan 1999 11:59:44 +0100 From: Luigi Rizzo Message-Id: <199901151059.LAA02067@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> Subject: Re: Cisco/Intel Ethernet Trunking To: easmith@beatrice.rutgers.edu (Allen Smith) Date: Fri, 15 Jan 1999 11:59:43 +0100 (MET) Cc: net@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <9901142208.ZM5749@beatrice.rutgers.edu> from "Allen Smith" at Jan 14, 99 10:07:45 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org [redirected to -net because it is more relevant there] > > Cisco seems to think that FreeBSD supports ethernet trunking, where > > multiple fxp cards in the machine connect to multiple 100BaseT ports on > > the switch and all appear as 1 "port" at 100/200/300/400 MB/s. > > > > Is this actually supported in stable? If so how do you set it up? > > See ftp://ftp.flirble.org/pub/unix/hacks/FreeBSD/mpath. This work is > still in progress; one thing that would be good for this would be > doing packet output to the least-loaded interface, instead of via the > current round-robin method. i think some pieces of the bridging code already in -stable/-current could be related to this. For bridging i had to implement the concept of a cluster of interfaces so that processes on the bridge machine could talk to the outside world independently of which side of the bridge the destination was. The approach i have chosen is: * assign IP addresses only to one interface ('head') in each cluster; * ARP is resolved using the head-of-cluster ethernet address; * Incoming pkts from any interface in a cluster are sent up as if they are coming from the head-of-cluster; * outgoing pkts are sent down the protocol stack using the head-of-cluster interface up to ether_output(), where they are redirected appropriately (e.g. in the case of a bridge basing on the dest.ethernet address). This would all map nicely with the concept of ethernet trunking, if one does one additional thing: force the same ethernet address for all ports in a trunk. This is necessary to avoid the need to put cards in promiscuous mode if they can only match one destination address. The relevant code is in /sys/netinet, /sys/net and the various if_xxx.c device driver, near the #ifdef BRIDGE sections. If someone wants to implement this stuff please let me know, i'd be happy to integrate this in the tree. cheers luigi -----------------------------------+------------------------------------- Luigi RIZZO . EMAIL: luigi@iet.unipi.it . Dip. di Ing. dell'Informazione HTTP://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/ . Universita` di Pisa TEL/FAX: +39-050-568.533/522 . via Diotisalvi 2, 56126 PISA (Italy) -----------------------------------+------------------------------------- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message