From owner-freebsd-smp Mon Oct 28 2:10:57 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8400237B401 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 02:10:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from da.mailomat.net (mailomat.net [212.185.46.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B27243E4A for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 02:10:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ap@bnc.net) Received: This mail has hopefully been cleaned of damaging elements. Received: from colossus.bnc.net (port-212-202-188-110.reverse.qdsl-home.de [212.202.188.110]) by da.mailomat.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id g9SA77wB067680; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:07:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ap@bnc.net) Received: from colossus.bnc.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by colossus.bnc.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id g9SAAbSV011531; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:10:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ap@colossus.bnc.net) Received: (from ap@localhost) by colossus.bnc.net (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id g9SAAabw011530; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:10:36 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ap) Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 11:10:36 +0100 From: Achim Patzner To: Kristopher Borodiansky Cc: smp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dual-Xeon Issue Message-ID: <20021028101036.GA11518@bnc.net> References: <20021025095759.GA9140@dipole.informationwave.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20021025095759.GA9140@dipole.informationwave.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 05:57:59AM -0400, Kristopher Borodiansky wrote: > Upon booting, the following error is displayed: > > AP #1 (PHY# 6) failed! > panic (y/n)? Would you please tell us a bit more about your machine (chipset, manufacturer etc.)? Regards, Achim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-smp Mon Oct 28 18: 2:18 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E42E37B401 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 18:02:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from canning.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04FB643E4A for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 18:02:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) Received: from wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by canning.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E7052A88D; Mon, 28 Oct 2002 18:02:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Danny Braniss Cc: James Schmidt , jrf4772 , smp@FreeBSD.ORG, Robert Bopko , Stephen Karrington Subject: Re: se7500cw2 hack to try In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 18:02:09 -0800 From: Peter Wemm Message-Id: <20021029020209.7E7052A88D@canning.wemm.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Danny Braniss wrote: > > Was a fix for this problem ever found ? I've heard nothing else about > > this recently, and was wondering if I may have missed a patch for it. > > > > Thanks in advance, > > James > > all's - too - quiet :-) > i gave back the box :-( The basic problem is that the folks that can fix it do not have a sample of the beast to work on. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-smp Tue Oct 29 0:11:30 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82B8237B401 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 00:11:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from da.mailomat.net (mailomat.net [212.185.46.86]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E7FD43E3B for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 00:11:18 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ap@bnc.net) Received: This mail has hopefully been cleaned of damaging elements. Received: from colossus.bnc.net (port-212-202-188-110.reverse.qdsl-home.de [212.202.188.110]) by da.mailomat.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id g9T87MwB001741; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 09:07:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ap@bnc.net) Received: from [194.39.192.154] (hyperion.wlan.bnc.net [194.39.192.154]) by colossus.bnc.net (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id g9T8AoSU013862; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 09:10:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ap@bnc.net) User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/10.0.0.1309 Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 09:10:52 +0100 Subject: Re: se7500cw2 hack to try From: Achim Patzner To: Peter Wemm Cc: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20021029020209.7E7052A88D@canning.wemm.org> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > Danny Braniss wrote: >>> Was a fix for this problem ever found ? I've heard nothing else about >>> this recently, and was wondering if I may have missed a patch for it. >>> >>> Thanks in advance, >>> James >> >> all's - too - quiet :-) >> i gave back the box :-( > > The basic problem is that the folks that can fix it do not have a sample > of the beast to work on. I've got a SuperMicro P4DPL-M-based machine in my work queue which I still didn't unpack as I'm not sure it's worth investing my time in it. I could probably set it up and connect its serial port to a Livingston Portmaster so remote debuggin was quite possible. Sending the beast (about 64 kg including disks) somewhere is definitely not an option (we're sitting somewhere in Germany and the poor soul who will be looking into this will probably be sitting 40 km off Timbuktu for all we know). If there is anyone willing to get this thing going (to check the environment first I'd give them access to a machine oon the rack besides ist future resting place - just to see if working across the Internet is an option for them) I'd be willing to risk the investment in mainboard and processors (i.e. if there is no chance of getting it to work I'll later on rip out the mainboard and put a SuperMicro P3TDLE in and try to get rid of that mainboard somewhere). Is there any reason that would make it impossible to do this on a machine with a 3ware RAID I'm not aware of? Achim To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-smp Tue Oct 29 6:58:28 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 628F737B401 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 06:58:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from daneel.freebsdfr.org (daneel.freebsdfr.org [62.4.21.96]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 623B143E75 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 06:58:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from freebsd@freebsdfr.org) Received: from localhost (daneel.freebsdfr.org [127.0.0.1]) by daneel.freebsdfr.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6672B30B33 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 15:58:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from freebsdfr.org (daneel.freebsdfr.org [127.0.0.1]) by daneel.freebsdfr.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 564D530B32 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 15:58:22 +0100 (CET) Received: from escalibur.carrefour.fr ([194.3.119.2]) (SquirrelMail authenticated user freebsd) by webmail.freebsdfr.org with HTTP; Tue, 29 Oct 2002 15:58:22 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <2198.194.3.119.2.1035903502.squirrel@webmail.freebsdfr.org> Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2002 15:58:22 +0100 (CET) Subject: low perf with bi-p3 & msi 694D-PRO, ubench From: "Christophe Yayon" To: X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal X-Mailer: SquirrelMail (version 1.2.8) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Hi all, I test my system (2*p3-700/512MoPC100/MSI 694D-PRO chip VIA) with ubench on freebsd-4.7 release (and smp kernel), but i have very poor perfs ; i get a small 47000 on CPU test... On the same hardware, i launched ubench on linux (gentoo 1.4RC1) and i get 90000 on CPU test. The seconds tests results seem to be normal (on linux), but the first (on FreeBSD) are strange... In dmesg i get 'SMP1 Launched' and on 'top' i have CPU0/CPU1 which seem to be normal ... Someone could help me please ? Thanks in advance... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message