From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 5 0:27:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from deborah.paradise.net.nz (deborah.paradise.net.nz [203.96.152.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A84FF37B419 for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 00:27:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: from saturn (203-79-103-164.tnt14.paradise.net.nz [203.79.103.164]) by deborah.paradise.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24488D457B for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 19:27:06 +1200 (NZST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: James Pole Organization: None To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND in -stable Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 19:27:01 +1200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4] References: <20020505151058Q.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> <20020504231746.H1525-100000@master.gorean.org> <20020505153435Y.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20020505153435Y.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200205051925.18247.kiwisurfer1986@yahoo.co.nz> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 05 May 2002 06:34, Makoto Matsushita wrote: > DougB> Your post essentially repeats the same argument I've already > DougB> made. I'm not suggesting that we upgrade bind in any of the > DougB> releng_4_* branches. What I am suggesting is that users who > DougB> have not updgraded to a version of freebsd that has 8.3.1 built > DougB> in should use 8.3.1 from the ports. > > Hmm, maybe I misunderstand your point, sorry. But as said in previous > email, 8.3.1's nsupdate(8) is broken and I don't like to use BIND > 8.3.1 even if ISC strongly suggests. I think we should just stay with the current version if 8.3.1 has some br= oken=20 tools. We should only consider upgrading if the new version works and the= re=20 are obivious security advantages of upgrading, since we don't want to bre= ak=20 anything. - James To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 5 0:29:20 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from vimfuego.saarinen.org (saarinen.org [203.79.82.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A27E337B417 for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 00:29:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (helo=den2) by vimfuego.saarinen.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Red Hack)) id 174GSJ-0003Gs-00; Sun, 05 May 2002 19:29:15 +1200 Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 19:28:20 +1200 (New Zealand Standard Time) From: Juha Saarinen To: James Pole Cc: "stable@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: BIND in -stable In-Reply-To: <200205051925.18247.kiwisurfer1986@yahoo.co.nz> Message-ID: X-Message-Flag: " " X-X-Sender: juha@vimfuego.saarinen.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 5 May 2002, James Pole wrote: > I think we should just stay with the current version if 8.3.1 has some > broken tools. We should only consider upgrading if the new version > works and there are obivious security advantages of upgrading, since we > don't want to break anything. In that case, a patched version 4 would be the best. -- Juha Saarinen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 5 0:32:55 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from deborah.paradise.net.nz (deborah.paradise.net.nz [203.96.152.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACDD637B400 for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 00:32:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from saturn (203-79-103-164.tnt14.paradise.net.nz [203.79.103.164]) by deborah.paradise.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E83AD4697 for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 19:32:49 +1200 (NZST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" From: James Pole Organization: None To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 19:32:44 +1200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200205051932.44071.james.pole@paradise.net.nz> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG unsubscribe freebsd-stable kiwisurfer1986@yahoo.co.nz subsribe freebsd-stable end --=20 James Pole - www.jamespole.cjb.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 5 0:38:46 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from deborah.paradise.net.nz (deborah.paradise.net.nz [203.96.152.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D69837B404 for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 00:38:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from saturn (203-79-103-164.tnt14.paradise.net.nz [203.79.103.164]) by deborah.paradise.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD9FDD46DC for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 19:38:37 +1200 (NZST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" From: James Pole Organization: None To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 19:38:33 +1200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200205051938.33155.james.pole@paradise.net.nz> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG auth d7b6955e subscribe freebsd-stable james.pole@paradise.net.nz end --=20 James Pole - www.jamespole.cjb.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 5 0:49:30 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mta01bw.bigpond.com (mta01bw.bigpond.com [139.134.6.78]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA43337B416 for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 00:49:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from MICHAEL2 ([144.135.24.87]) by mta01bw.bigpond.com (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15 mta01bw Feb 26 2002 03:44:21) with SMTP id GVMOED00.55H for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 17:49:25 +1000 Received: from CPE-203-45-60-244.vic.bigpond.net.au ([203.45.60.244]) by bwmam07.mailsvc.email.bigpond.com(MailRouter V3.0l 56/2918520); 05 May 2002 17:49:24 Message-ID: <010401c1f409$65fbd350$2701a8c0@MICHAEL2> From: "Michael Phaze" To: References: <20020504223450.GA1025@grind.grind.dom> Subject: Re: ipfilter problem Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 17:49:32 +1000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I used to use the return-rst rule, but at the end of the day it can cause to many hard to see problems. I used to think it was a good way to hide open ports, but its better just to suck in the packet and not reply because it makes it nmaps go alot slower (if not unscannable) which to me is more worth while then trying to hide services or hide the fact a firewall is there. Just my 2 cents :) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael Riexinger" To: Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2002 8:34 AM Subject: ipfilter problem > Hi, > > I have FreeBSD-STABLE (4.6-PRERELEASE) From May, 1st and I cannot > communicate with the host news.cis.dfn.de (neither nntp nor http, but > only this host, others work). When I remove this ipf rule it works: > > block return-rst in log quick on isp0 proto tcp from any to any > > But with a prior version of STABLE or 4.5-RELEASE it worked. > > greets, > Michael > > -- > "Testing? What's that? If it compiles, it is good, > if it boots up, it is perfect." -- Linus Torvalds > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 5 1:20:25 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from hcshh.hcs.de (hcshh.hcs.de [194.123.40.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3625637B405; Sun, 5 May 2002 01:20:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost.hcs.de [127.0.0.1]) by hcshh.hcs.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3CC3155A3; Sun, 5 May 2002 10:20:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from hcswork.hcs.de (hcswork.hcs.de [172.24.124.5]) by hcshh.hcs.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BEF9155A1; Sun, 5 May 2002 10:20:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: by hcswork.hcs.de (Postfix, from userid 200) id 6BC1A5D2; Sun, 5 May 2002 10:20:16 +0200 (METDST) Subject: Re: port/racoon broken In-Reply-To: <200205040258.g442w24I039100@grumpy.dyndns.org> "from David Kelly at May 3, 2002 09:58:02 pm" To: David Kelly Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 10:20:16 +0200 (METDST) Cc: "David W. Chapman Jr." , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, sumikawa@freebsd.org Reply-To: hm@hcs.de Organization: HCS Hanseatischer Computerservice GmbH X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL84 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Message-Id: <20020505082016.6BC1A5D2@hcswork.hcs.de> From: hm@hcs.de (Hellmuth Michaelis) X-Virus-Scanned-HCS: by AMaViS perl-11 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG From the keyboard of David Kelly: > Am concerned a bit about this because my two ends *are* talking to each > other with the new racoon. This is strange. I tested it with 2 very recent -stable machines and both showed the same behaviour: a) lots of binary data in the logfiles b) both were not able to find any interface/ip-address on both machines c) they did not talk anything to each other. The old racoon port works well for me in those environments. hellmuth -- Hellmuth Michaelis Tel +49 40 55 97 47-70 HCS Hanseatischer Computerservice GmbH Fax +49 40 55 97 47-77 Oldesloer Strasse 97-99 Mail hm [at] hcs.de D-22457 Hamburg WWW http://www.hcs.de To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 5 3:43:14 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from piggy.rz.tu-ilmenau.de (piggy.rz.tu-ilmenau.de [141.24.4.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E1D37B417 for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 03:43:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gtw.hh59.local (pD9508E42.dip.t-dialin.net [217.80.142.66]) (authenticated (0 bits)) by piggy.rz.tu-ilmenau.de (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g45Ah2v10184 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168 bits) verified NO) ; Sun, 5 May 2002 12:43:05 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from walnut.hh59.local (walnut.hh59.local [192.168.2.10]) by gtw.hh59.local (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g45BDmT04919 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168 bits) verified FAIL) for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 13:13:52 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 49493 invoked by uid 1000); 5 May 2002 10:43:13 -0000 Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 12:43:13 +0200 From: Martin Kaeske To: Scott Dodson Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /dev/dsp: Device busy Message-ID: <20020505124313.A49334@walnut.hh59.local> Mail-Followup-To: Scott Dodson , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20020430224551.A2720@walnut.hh59.local> <20020504211333.B55035@sdodson.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20020504211333.B55035@sdodson.com>; from gsi22419@gsaix2.cc.gasou.edu on Sat, May 04, 2002 at 09:13:33PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 09:13:33PM -0400, Scott Dodson wrote: > You're not by any chance running KDE? I'm having loads of > problems ever since I decided to experiment with KDE. artsd > locks up after a few minutes of use. Nothing, no artsd no esd not a single process holding /dev/dsp open (tested with lsof and fstat). Martin -- "At the beginning of the week, we sealed ten BSD programmers into a computer room with a single distribution of BSD Unix. Upon opening the room after seven days, we found all ten programmers dead, clutching each others throats, and thirteen new flavors of BSD." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 5 4:18:27 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cheer.mahoroba.org (flets19-004.kamome.or.jp [218.45.19.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1396E37B404 for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 04:18:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mille.mahoroba.org (IDENT:BrTkucvmVPp3ui14CfKGFhGLBNbR6jiopFfWhr+SXmOEz9BtWklw/yxk48HBSXJo@mille.mahoroba.org [IPv6:2001:200:301:0:202:2dff:fe0a:6bee]) (user=ume mech=CRAM-MD5 bits=0) by cheer.mahoroba.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP/inet6 id g45BIKLR074749 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Sun, 5 May 2002 20:18:24 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from ume@mahoroba.org) Date: Sun, 05 May 2002 20:18:12 +0900 Message-ID: From: Hajimu UMEMOTO To: Makoto Matsushita Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: BIND in -stable In-Reply-To: <20020505152552H.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: xcite1.38> Wanderlust/2.8.1 (Something) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386--freebsd) MULE/5.0 (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOC1MWhsoQg==?=) X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.6-PRERELEASE MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-2022-JP X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS-perl11-milter (http://amavis.org/) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, >>> Sun, 05 May 2002 15:25:52 +0900 $B$N9o$K!V(Bmatusita$B!W!"$9$J$o$A(B >>> Makoto Matsushita $B;a[)$/(B matusita> Just FYI: nsupdate(8) bundled with BIND 8.3.1 is known as *broken*. matusita> If 4.6-RELEASE is out, all nsupdate(8) users will confuse that it matusita> dosn't work as expected. BIND 8.3.2 (if released) fixes this problem. matusita> ISC doesn't allow us to fix this problem to FreeBSD's BIND 8.3.1, so matusita> 4.6-RELEASE's nsupdate(8) is broken also. Still you want to say all matusita> users should upgrade their BIND 8.2.4 to 8.3.1? :-) nslookup of BIND 8.3.1 has another problem. If you put IPv6 address for nameserver in /etc/resolv.conf, you cannot use nslookup at all. This is because libbind supports IPv6 but nslookup doesn't. I have a workaround patch to avoild this problem. However, I have not sent it to ISC, yet. Sincerely, -- Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan ume@mahoroba.org ume@bisd.hitachi.co.jp ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org http://www.imasy.org/~ume/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 5 4:30:23 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from a96180.upc-a.chello.nl (a96180.upc-a.chello.nl [62.163.96.180]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 733B737B400 for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 04:30:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: by a96180.upc-a.chello.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id EB82D2177; Sun, 5 May 2002 13:30:14 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 13:30:14 +0200 From: Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai To: atk2@arctic.org Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: device permissions Message-ID: <20020505113014.GP66061@daemon.ninth-circle.org> References: <20020504165741.17472.qmail@twinlark.arctic.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020504165741.17472.qmail@twinlark.arctic.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Organisation: Ninth Circle Enterprises Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -On [20020504 19:28], atk2@arctic.org (atk2@arctic.org) wrote: >So -- question -- why didn't those devices which need to be world read able >(aka /dev/random) get made that way ? They are: [13:27] [asmodai@purgatory] (18) {0} $ grep random /usr/src/etc/MAKEDEV mknod random c 2 3; chmod 644 random mknod urandom c 2 4; chmod 644 urandom I am seriously suspecting something local must be wrong on your box. Everything works as advertised here. -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven / asmodai / Kita no Mono asmodai@wxs.nl, finger asmodai@ninth-circle.org http://www.softweyr.com/asmodai/ | http://www.tendra.org/ Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 5 4:34:56 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ei.bzerk.org (ei.xs4all.nl [213.84.67.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5EC037B419 for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 04:34:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ei.bzerk.org (IDENT:iBOFH--ident-is-a-completely-pointless-protocol!@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ei.bzerk.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g45BYmUp001018; Sun, 5 May 2002 13:34:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ruben@ei.bzerk.org) Received: (from ruben@localhost) by ei.bzerk.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g45BYmiq001017; Sun, 5 May 2002 13:34:48 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 13:34:48 +0200 From: Ruben de Groot To: Makoto Matsushita Cc: asmodai@wxs.nl, stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ROOTDEVNAME changed for bootable cd Message-ID: <20020505133448.A962@ei.bzerk.org> References: <20020502010426C.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> <20020501183522.A75016@ei.bzerk.org> <20020504120347.GX66061@daemon.ninth-circle.org> <20020505004634U.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020505004634U.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org>; from matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org on Sun, May 05, 2002 at 12:46:34AM +0900 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 12:46:34AM +0900, Makoto Matsushita sat behind the 'puter and typed: > > asmodai> Makoto-san, what idea did you have about trying the `a' > asmodai> slice? > > In Old 4-stable system, /dev/acd0a and /dev/acd0c are different: > > crw-rw-rw- 2 root operator 117, 0 Feb 7 01:53 /dev/acd0a > crw-rw-rw- 2 root operator 117, 2 Feb 7 01:53 /dev/acd0c > > However, in recent 4-stable, /dev/acd0a and /dev/acd0c are same: > > crw-r----- 4 root operator 117, 0 May 5 00:39 /dev/acd0a > crw-r----- 4 root operator 117, 0 May 5 00:39 /dev/acd0c > > This is because new ata code was MFCed to 4-stable (I forgot when.) > > I doubt if fbsd-stable@bzerk.org's CD-ROM has old /dev directory (it > is obvious that s/he uses newer kernel.) > I did run mergemaster (and MAKEDEV) ruben@ei$ ls -l acd0* crw-r----- 4 root operator 117, 0 Apr 28 18:47 acd0a crw-r----- 4 root operator 117, 0 Apr 28 18:47 acd0c but at the moment the problem occurs (mountroot), there's still only the bootable floppy image on the CD-ROM (with the new kernel, but without a /dev directory), so how can this be of influence? Ruben de Groot > -- - > Makoto `MAR' Matsushita To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 5 4:45:44 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from a96180.upc-a.chello.nl (a96180.upc-a.chello.nl [62.163.96.180]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F9BD37B400 for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 04:45:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by a96180.upc-a.chello.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 3D5F0219C; Sun, 5 May 2002 13:45:33 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 13:45:33 +0200 From: Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai To: Andy Sparrow Cc: Martin Karlsson , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/mutt-devel Makefile Message-ID: <20020505114533.GR66061@daemon.ninth-circle.org> References: <20020504182649.GA1168@foo31-146.visit.se> <20020504201516.BA9CA3E14@CRWdog.demon.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020504201516.BA9CA3E14@CRWdog.demon.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Organisation: Ninth Circle Enterprises Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -On [20020504 22:30], Andy Sparrow (spadger@best.com) wrote: >Why is this happening anyway? Last thread I saw on the topic turned into a >clash of commiter privs (as in "I have them, it'll be this way"). Are you talking about the postings on cvs-all or? [snip colour discussion] >I'm also not about to start frobbing said systems to understand 'xterm-color' >or 'cons25' term types (another annoyance, but 'ansi' works well enough for >most things), 'coz this just doesn't scale. Mmm, so that's where the xterm-color stuff came from. Mmm, let me see if I can fix things. -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven / asmodai / Kita no Mono asmodai@wxs.nl, finger asmodai@ninth-circle.org http://www.softweyr.com/asmodai/ | http://www.tendra.org/ Joy comes, grief goes, we know not how... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 5 5:16:38 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.rz.uni-ulm.de (gemini.rz.uni-ulm.de [134.60.246.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEA4037B407 for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 05:16:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lilith.wh-wurm.uni-ulm.de (lilith.wh-wurm.uni-ulm.de [134.60.106.64]) by mail.rz.uni-ulm.de (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g45CGSp3015154; Sun, 5 May 2002 14:16:29 +0200 (MEST) Subject: Re: /dev/dsp: Device busy From: Siegbert Baude To: Scott Dodson Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20020505124313.A49334@walnut.hh59.local> References: <20020430224551.A2720@walnut.hh59.local> <20020504211333.B55035@sdodson.com> <20020505124313.A49334@walnut.hh59.local> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 Date: 05 May 2002 14:16:29 +0200 Message-Id: <1020600989.336.6.camel@lilith.wh-wurm.uni-ulm.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 09:13:33PM -0400, Scott Dodson wrote: > You're not by any chance running KDE? I'm having loads of > problems ever since I decided to experiment with KDE. artsd > locks up after a few minutes of use. FWIW, this works really fine in KDE 3.0 now. If you start any program which tries to access /dev/dsp with "artsdsp program" e.g. bash$ artsdsp xmms& instead of bash$ xmms& xmms or any other sound program works perfectly together with artsd. Thanks to the great work of the KDE porters. :-) Ciao Siegbert To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 5 5:47:20 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from empty1.ekahuna.com (empty1.ekahuna.com [198.144.200.196]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3570337B404 for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 05:47:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pc-02 (pc02.ekahuna.com [198.144.200.197]) by empty1.ekahuna.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-0U10L2S100V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 05:47:13 -0700 From: "Philip J. Koenig" Organization: The Electric Kahuna Organization To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 05:47:12 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: [OffTopic] Hotmail sysadmin contact Reply-To: pjklist@ekahuna.com X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c) Message-ID: <20020505124713567.AAA900@empty1.ekahuna.com@pc02.ekahuna.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Sorry for the off-topic post, but I thought someone in the group might have maintained contacts from back in the days Hotmail was mostly running FreeBSD. A friend has had their Hotmail account killed for a bogus reason (Hotmail is infamous for this) and has lost 5 yrs of info and gotten nowhere from the customer-service angle. I was hoping I could find a techie contact there that I could just talk shop with and find out if there is any way to retrieve any of the data from that cancelled account. Any leads appreciated and sorry for the interruption, thanks. Phil -- Philip J. Koenig pjklist@ekahuna.com Electric Kahuna Systems -- Computers & Communications for the New Millenium To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 5 6:22:59 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.webmonster.de (datasink.webmonster.de [194.162.162.209]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7266937B406 for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 06:22:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 73843 invoked by uid 1000); 5 May 2002 13:23:14 -0000 Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 15:23:14 +0200 From: "Karsten W. Rohrbach" To: Michael Riexinger Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfilter problem Message-ID: <20020505152314.B73550@mail.webmonster.de> References: <20020504223450.GA1025@grind.grind.dom> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="E39vaYmALEf/7YXx" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20020504223450.GA1025@grind.grind.dom>; from mailinglists@grindking.de on Sun, May 05, 2002 at 12:34:50AM +0200 X-Arbitrary-Number-Of-The-Day: 42 X-URL: http://www.webmonster.de/ X-Disclaimer: My opinions do not necessarily represent those of my employer X-Work-URL: http://www.ngenn.net/ X-Work-Address: nGENn GmbH, Schloss Kransberg, D-61250 Usingen-Kransberg, Germany X-Work-Phone: +49-6081-682-304 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --E39vaYmALEf/7YXx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Michael Riexinger(mailinglists@grindking.de)@2002.05.05 00:34:50 +0000: > Hi, >=20 > I have FreeBSD-STABLE (4.6-PRERELEASE) From May, 1st and I cannot > communicate with the host news.cis.dfn.de (neither nntp nor http, but > only this host, others work). When I remove this ipf rule it works:=20 >=20 > block return-rst in log quick on isp0 proto tcp from any to any >=20 > But with a prior version of STABLE or 4.5-RELEASE it worked.=20 the problem can only be analyzed efficiently if you show us the rest of the ruleset. anything else is pure guesswork, based on assumptions about your ipf configuration. regards, /k --=20 > A Christian is a man who feels repentance on Sunday for what he did on > Saturday and is going to do on Monday. --Thomas Ybarra WebMonster Community Project -- Next Generation Networks GmbH -- All on BSD http://www.webmonster.de/ -- ftp://ftp.webmonster.de/ -- http://www.ngenn.n= et/ GnuPG: 0xDEC948A6 D/E BF11 83E8 84A1 F996 68B4 A113 B393 6BF4 DEC9 48A6 REVOKED: 0x2964BF46 D/E 42F9 9FFF 50D4 2F38 DBEE DF22 3340 4F4E 2964 BF46 REVOKED: 0x4C44DA59 RSA F9 A0 DF 91 74 07 6A 1C 5F 0B E0 6B 4D CD 8C 44 My mail is GnuPG signed -- Unsigned ones are bogus -- http://www.gnupg.org/ Please do not remove my address from To: and Cc: fields in mailing lists. 1= 0x --E39vaYmALEf/7YXx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE81TJCs5Nr9N7JSKYRAu9tAKCWRsSbglPaS8xJqBePZaDm/uhCjACgmVoQ Pml4nuPzhxKrwBX4QaPwzv8= =BPmx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --E39vaYmALEf/7YXx-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 5 6:32:10 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ED7B37B403; Sun, 5 May 2002 06:32:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (marck@localhost) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g45DW0B18887; Sun, 5 May 2002 17:32:00 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 17:32:00 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: sos@freebsd.org Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: ata(4) -STABLE subsystem and tags MFC Message-ID: <20020505172814.N39434-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello there Soren, any chances patch for ata subsystem at date: 2002/04/18 19:11:45; that fixes tagged support for ata(4) will be MFC'd before 4.6-R? Thanks in advance. Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 5 6:32:42 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from grindking.dyndns.org (dialin-212-144-131-015.arcor-ip.net [212.144.131.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AC6337B40D for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 06:32:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by grindking.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id BFC7340BE; Sun, 5 May 2002 15:32:04 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 15:32:04 +0200 From: Michael Riexinger To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfilter problem Message-ID: <20020505133204.GA667@grind.grind.dom> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20020504223450.GA1025@grind.grind.dom> <20020505152314.B73550@mail.webmonster.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020505152314.B73550@mail.webmonster.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun May 5 15:23:14 2002, Karsten W. Rohrbach wrote: > the problem can only be analyzed efficiently if you show us the rest of > the ruleset. anything else is pure guesswork, based on assumptions about > your ipf configuration. > > regards, > /k Ok, here they are. But I wonder why it worked withot problems with previous versions of FreeBSD/ipfilter. With netstat I can see FIN_WAIT_1 states to the newsserver. (tcp4 0 0 dialin-212-144-1.49368 news.fu-berlin.d.nntp FIN_WAIT_1) pass in quick on lo0 all pass out quick on lo0 all pass in quick on ed0 all pass out quick on ed0 all pass out quick on isp0 proto tcp/udp from any to any keep state pass out quick on isp0 proto icmp from any to any keep state pass in quick on isp0 proto tcp from any to any port = 80 pass in quick on isp0 proto tcp from any to any port = 60000 block return-icmp-as-dest(host-unr) in log quick on isp0 proto icmp from any to any block return-rst in log quick on isp0 proto tcp from any to any block return-icmp(port-unr) in log quick on isp0 proto udp from any to any greets, Michael -- "Testing? What's that? If it compiles, it is good, if it boots up, it is perfect." -- Linus Torvalds To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 5 6:40: 0 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from quicksilver.ukc.ac.uk (quicksilver.ukc.ac.uk [129.12.21.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8B0737B403; Sun, 5 May 2002 06:39:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from myrtle.ukc.ac.uk ([129.12.3.176] ident=root) by quicksilver.ukc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.22 #4) id 174ME3-0007fu-00; Sun, 05 May 2002 14:38:55 +0100 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=tim ident=root) by myrtle.ukc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1) id 174MEY-0002Ch-00; Sun, 05 May 2002 14:39:27 +0100 Received: from 127.0.0.1 by tim ([127.0.0.1]) with ESMTP; Sun, 5 May 2002 14:39:18 +0100 From: "Tim Bishop" To: , "'David Kelly'" Cc: "'David W. Chapman Jr.'" , , Subject: RE: port/racoon broken Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 14:39:18 +0100 Message-ID: <012b01c1f43a$4153dc60$6401a8c0@ad.18hp.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: <20020505082016.6BC1A5D2@hcswork.hcs.de> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Server: VPOP3 Enterprise V1.5.0b - Registered X-UKC-Mail-System: No virus detected Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG > [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG] On Behalf Of > Hellmuth Michaelis > Sent: 05 May 2002 09:20 > To: David Kelly > Cc: David W. Chapman Jr.; freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; > sumikawa@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: port/racoon broken > > > >From the keyboard of David Kelly: > > > Am concerned a bit about this because my two ends *are* talking to > > each other with the new racoon. > > This is strange. I tested it with 2 very recent -stable > machines and both showed the same behaviour: a) lots of > binary data in the logfiles b) both were not able to find any > interface/ip-address on both machines c) they did not talk > anything to each other. > > The old racoon port works well for me in those environments. I don't want to add a "me too", but I'm not having any trouble making two 4-STABLE boxes talk to each other using the latest racoon. I am, however, getting lots of odd binary data and errors in the logs. Very strange. Hopefully someone will fix things before 4.6 gets released. Tim. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 5 9: 2:46 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2A7B37B408 for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 09:02:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (marck@localhost) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g45G2fF21321 for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 20:02:41 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 20:02:41 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: portupgrade-20020429 (fwd) Message-ID: <20020505200203.W39434-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dear colleagues, TWIMC Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 20:01:43 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: knu@freebsd.org Subject: portupgrade-20020429 Hi there colleagues, last commit to ports/sysutils/portupgrade broke portversion. Old version had one line in pkgtools.conf: ENV['PKG_PATH'] ||= ENV['PACKAGES'] + '/All' New version needs three of them: ENV['PORTSDIR'] ||= '/usr/ports' ENV['PACKAGES'] ||= ENV['PORTSDIR'] + '/packages' ENV['PKG_PATH'] ||= ENV['PACKAGES'] + '/All' And in absence of first and second lines, portversion fails with ** Error occured reading /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf: undefined method `+' for nil So, I suppose some intelligent upgrade process of pkgtools.conf is needed. Sorry, haven't done it myself. Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 5 9: 3:43 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from CRWdog.demon.co.uk (p69-199.acedsl.com [66.114.69.199]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B8CD37B405 for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 09:03:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by CRWdog.demon.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8A033E14; Sun, 5 May 2002 12:03:20 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Martin Karlsson , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: xterm and colour (Was: cvs commit: ports/mail/mutt-devel...) In-Reply-To: Message from Martin Karlsson of "Sat, 04 May 2002 23:19:47 +0200." <20020504211946.GB497@foo31-146.visit.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1715463552P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 05 May 2002 12:03:20 -0400 From: Andy Sparrow Message-Id: <20020505160320.E8A033E14@CRWdog.demon.co.uk> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --==_Exmh_1715463552P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > > Most people want to have local xterms Just Work. In mono by default, but > > display color if you run up sysinstall/mutt/ports dialog etc. in an xterm. > > > > They also want remote xterms to display correctly on their local screens. > > Yep. Actually, there's another case that I neglected - running apps within a "foreign" xterm on a FreeBSD system. Very few of the machines I work with in $DAYJOB have heads, so this isn't a problem for me, but it may be the root cause why things are the way they are. > > This used to work perfectly with the color customizations in ~/.Xdefaults and > > Xterm-color (an acceptable hack, IMHO), but this no longer works. > > > > Setting TERM=xterm-color (or some other wonky, non-standard value) to get this > > is not really acceptable (for me at least). > > [...snip...] > > > > I think I've just talked myself into doing the local hack - but it seems > > unnecessary to me, and it pains me when other people say of my favorite OS: > > > > : The xterm-color value for $TERM is a bad choice for XFree86 xterm > > : because it is commonly used for a terminfo entry which happens to > > : not support bce. Complicating matters, FreeBSD (after dithering for > > : a few years on the matter) has a bastardized version which implies > > : the opposite sense of bce, (because it uses SGR 39 and 49), but > > : does not set it. > > And if a FreeBSD-user asks on a non-freebsd list (something like > "Hi, I run freebsd-4.x, how do I get foo to show colour in an > xterm?"), and you reply "xterm-color yadda yadda blah", Thomas > Dickey appear instantly, pointing his finger saying "FreeBSD is bad!" > > Not Fun(TM). I hear that. > > Present behaviour just seems flat-out wrong to me. > > It sure does. Who is responsible? The port (XFree86 ?) maintainer? > Someone else? I believe that the problem is that the system term* stuff doesn't have the correct entries for xterm (e.g. not the stuff that ships with XFree86) and thus it's not strictly a ports issue. > Do you think sending some polite e-mails to The Right > Person(TM) would help? I'm sure that no-one is deliberately breaking anything, simply that they don't see it as a problem the way they work, so perhaps yes. On this topic in <200007190145.SAA20697@mass.osd.bsdi.com>, Mike Smith said: | We've generally maintained that we should ship whatever the XFree86 | people send us. What's their take on this? Regards, AS --==_Exmh_1715463552P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQE81VfIPHh895bDXeQRAljYAKCMr1PpE48LSoHPP0RineakqMmixwCgnh7T zotrZHcZawet6jH2W6JHsq8= =dRDL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1715463552P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 5 9:24:19 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (castle.jp.FreeBSD.org [210.226.20.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26A2E37B404 for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 09:24:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [::1]) by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.3) with ESMTP/inet6 id g45GNlf76670; Mon, 6 May 2002 01:23:48 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org) Cc: asmodai@wxs.nl, stable@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <20020505133448.A962@ei.bzerk.org> References: <20020504120347.GX66061@daemon.ninth-circle.org> <20020505004634U.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> <20020505133448.A962@ei.bzerk.org> X-User-Agent: Mew/1.94.2 XEmacs/21.5 (bamboo) X-FaceAnim: (-O_O-)(O_O- )(_O- )(O- )(- -)( -O)( -O_)( -O_O)(-O_O-) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 7 From: Makoto Matsushita To: fbsd-stable@bzerk.org Subject: Re: ROOTDEVNAME changed for bootable cd Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 01:23:45 +0900 Message-Id: <20020506012345G.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG fbsd-stable> but at the moment the problem occurs (mountroot), Hmm, my assumption was totally wrong... sorry. -- - Makoto `MAR' Matsushita To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 5 9:24:48 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from CRWdog.demon.co.uk (p69-199.acedsl.com [66.114.69.199]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D32637B40C for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 09:24:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by CRWdog.demon.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 261913E34; Sun, 5 May 2002 12:24:35 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai Cc: Martin Karlsson , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/mutt-devel Makefile In-Reply-To: Message from Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai of "Sun, 05 May 2002 13:45:33 +0200." <20020505114533.GR66061@daemon.ninth-circle.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_1836809562P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 05 May 2002 12:24:35 -0400 From: Andy Sparrow Message-Id: <20020505162435.261913E34@CRWdog.demon.co.uk> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --==_Exmh_1836809562P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > Are you talking about the postings on cvs-all or? Err, well, I don't read cvs-all, so that's unlikely :) Hmm, actually, it looks like the "Color ls"[1] thread on -stable from ~ 1= 8 Jul = 2000 that I was remembering, and it seems my recollection may be at fault= (I = couldn't bear to read it /all/ though). [1] I personally don't like/use colorized ls, find it useful about once e= very = 2-3 years and couldn't really care less about it. > >I'm also not about to start frobbing said systems to understand 'xterm= -color' = > >or 'cons25' term types (another annoyance, but 'ansi' works well enoug= h for = > >most things), 'coz this just doesn't scale. > = > Mmm, so that's where the xterm-color stuff came from. Well, strictly speaking, 'xterm-color' is also wrong because some other = systems use it as the type for a different (now obsolete) terminal descen= ded = from xterm that supports color. Apparently. Thomas Dickey in his FAQ: http://dickey.his.com/xterm/xterm.faq.html#xterm_terminfo says to use 'xterm-xfree86' on FreeBSD, because we got the 'xterm-color' = entry = wrong. *sigh* > Mmm, let me see if I can fix things. That would have to be beer. :) Regards, AS --==_Exmh_1836809562P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQE81VzDPHh895bDXeQRAlhQAJ9TlY8QP3scEvUfowdgUSW8A5hdAwCfazsu NfVxdxgt7wa0oZWGNZFdBMg= =4bmM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_1836809562P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 5 9:46:21 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.webmonster.de (datasink.webmonster.de [194.162.162.209]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 39B6F37B400 for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 09:46:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 76658 invoked by uid 1000); 5 May 2002 16:46:30 -0000 Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 18:46:30 +0200 From: "Karsten W. Rohrbach" To: Michael Riexinger Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfilter problem Message-ID: <20020505184630.A76286@mail.webmonster.de> References: <20020504223450.GA1025@grind.grind.dom> <20020505152314.B73550@mail.webmonster.de> <20020505133204.GA667@grind.grind.dom> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20020505133204.GA667@grind.grind.dom>; from mailinglists@grindking.de on Sun, May 05, 2002 at 03:32:04PM +0200 X-Arbitrary-Number-Of-The-Day: 42 X-URL: http://www.webmonster.de/ X-Disclaimer: My opinions do not necessarily represent those of my employer X-Work-URL: http://www.ngenn.net/ X-Work-Address: nGENn GmbH, Schloss Kransberg, D-61250 Usingen-Kransberg, Germany X-Work-Phone: +49-6081-682-304 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Michael Riexinger(mailinglists@grindking.de)@2002.05.05 15:32:04 +0000: > On Sun May 5 15:23:14 2002, Karsten W. Rohrbach wrote: > > the problem can only be analyzed efficiently if you show us the rest of > > the ruleset. anything else is pure guesswork, based on assumptions about > > your ipf configuration. > >=20 > > regards, > > /k > Ok, here they are. But I wonder why it worked withot problems with > previous versions of FreeBSD/ipfilter. With netstat I can see FIN_WAIT_1 > states to the newsserver.=20 > (tcp4 0 0 dialin-212-144-1.49368 news.fu-berlin.d.nntp =20 > FIN_WAIT_1) >=20 >=20 > pass in quick on lo0 all > pass out quick on lo0 all >=20 > pass in quick on ed0 all > pass out quick on ed0 all >=20 > pass out quick on isp0 proto tcp/udp from any to any keep state pass out quick on isp0 proto tcp from any to any flags S/SA keep state pass out quick on isp0 proto udp from any to any keep state instead of the above one line should work. if it doesn't then give me a slap on the head, i'm still a bit drunk from yesterday ;-) > pass out quick on isp0 proto icmp from any to any keep state >=20 > pass in quick on isp0 proto tcp from any to any port =3D 80 > pass in quick on isp0 proto tcp from any to any port =3D 60000=20 >=20 > block return-icmp-as-dest(host-unr) in log quick on isp0 proto icmp from > any to any=20 > block return-rst in log quick on isp0 proto tcp from any to any > block return-icmp(port-unr) in log quick on isp0 proto udp from any to > any >=20 'ipfstat -s' on your box will tell you about state statistics. when you reload your rule set for testing, you should invoke it like 'ipf -Fa -FS -f/etc/ipf.rules' or similar, just to kick out the old state table. 'ipfstat -t' gives you a "top" style display of current states, so you can check them in realtime. regards, /k --=20 > MCSE: Minesweeper Consultant & Solitaire Engineer WebMonster Community Project -- Next Generation Networks GmbH -- All on BSD http://www.webmonster.de/ -- ftp://ftp.webmonster.de/ -- http://www.ngenn.n= et/ GnuPG: 0xDEC948A6 D/E BF11 83E8 84A1 F996 68B4 A113 B393 6BF4 DEC9 48A6 REVOKED: 0x2964BF46 D/E 42F9 9FFF 50D4 2F38 DBEE DF22 3340 4F4E 2964 BF46 REVOKED: 0x4C44DA59 RSA F9 A0 DF 91 74 07 6A 1C 5F 0B E0 6B 4D CD 8C 44 My mail is GnuPG signed -- Unsigned ones are bogus -- http://www.gnupg.org/ Please do not remove my address from To: and Cc: fields in mailing lists. 1= 0x --u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE81WHms5Nr9N7JSKYRAuiDAJ9KgKzRBAmEaow9C3lXL+1XoeVMDQCeITgG i5vaGxIAGwenR1Uq2WWNRNE= =4Zof -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --u3/rZRmxL6MmkK24-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 5 11:28: 9 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from polaris.we.lc.ehu.es (polaris.we.lc.ehu.es [158.227.6.43]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D380437B49B for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 11:25:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from v-ger.we.lc.ehu.es (lxpx320.lx.ehu.es [158.227.26.220]) by polaris.we.lc.ehu.es (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g45IPLH12288; Sun, 5 May 2002 20:25:22 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from jose@localhost) by v-ger.we.lc.ehu.es (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g45ENxd02390; Sun, 5 May 2002 16:23:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jose) Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 16:23:59 +0200 From: "Jose M. Alcaide" To: Andy Sparrow Cc: Martin Karlsson , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/mutt-devel Makefile Message-ID: <20020505162358.E237@v-ger.we.lc.ehu.es> References: <20020504201516.BA9CA3E14@CRWdog.demon.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20020504201516.BA9CA3E14@CRWdog.demon.co.uk>; from spadger@best.com on Sat, May 04, 2002 at 04:15:16PM -0400 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 04:15:16PM -0400, Andy Sparrow wrote: > This used to work perfectly with the color customizations in > ~/.Xdefaults and Xterm-color (an acceptable hack, IMHO), but this no > longer works. > > Setting TERM=xterm-color (or some other wonky, non-standard value) to > get this is not really acceptable (for me at least). I am succesfully using this hack: In ~/.Xdefaults: *customization: -color And in app-defaults/XTerm-color: *termName: xterm-color (you can add "XTerm*termName: xterm-color" to ~/.Xdefaults instead) Actually, I think that "*termName: xterm-color" should be always defined in app-defaults/XTerm-color. Maybe the x11/XFree86-4-clients port should apply a patch for doing that, given that FreeBSD has both "xterm" and "xterm-color" entries in termcap(5). Just my 0.02 Euro. -- ****** Jose M. Alcaide // jose@we.lc.ehu.es // jmas@FreeBSD.org ****** ** "Beware of Programmers who carry screwdrivers" -- Leonard Brandwein ** To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 5 11:39:24 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from moek.pir.net (moek.pir.net [130.64.1.215]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11E1737B404 for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 11:39:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pir by moek.pir.net with local (Exim) id 174Qul-0007FN-00 for stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Sun, 05 May 2002 14:39:19 -0400 Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 14:39:18 -0400 From: Peter Radcliffe To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/mutt-devel Makefile Message-ID: <20020505183918.GA27835@pir.net> Reply-To: stable@freebsd.org Mail-Followup-To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20020504201516.BA9CA3E14@CRWdog.demon.co.uk> <20020505162358.E237@v-ger.we.lc.ehu.es> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020505162358.E237@v-ger.we.lc.ehu.es> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i X-fish: < X-Copy-On-Listmail: Please do NOT Cc: me on list mail. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Jose M. Alcaide" probably said: > In ~/.Xdefaults: > *customization: -color > And in app-defaults/XTerm-color: > *termName: xterm-color > > (you can add "XTerm*termName: xterm-color" to ~/.Xdefaults instead) > > Actually, I think that "*termName: xterm-color" should be always defined > in app-defaults/XTerm-color. Maybe the x11/XFree86-4-clients port should > apply a patch for doing that, given that FreeBSD has both "xterm" and > "xterm-color" entries in termcap(5). Other OSen do not have xterm-color, though (as has already been mentioned, Solaris), so this breaks as soon as you ssh to one of these remote machines. As someone who runs Solaris servers from a FreeBSD desktop I do this a lot. If you tried to make this the default you'd get a lot of very annoyed people. P. -- pir pir-sig@pir.net pir-sig@net.tufts.edu To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 5 12:31:54 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from CRWdog.demon.co.uk (p69-199.acedsl.com [66.114.69.199]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A93A237B404 for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 12:31:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by CRWdog.demon.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C60593E14 for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 15:31:47 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/mutt-devel Makefile In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 05 May 2002 14:39:18 EDT." <20020505183918.GA27835@pir.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="==_Exmh_-696087446P"; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 05 May 2002 15:31:47 -0400 From: Andy Sparrow Message-Id: <20020505193147.C60593E14@CRWdog.demon.co.uk> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --==_Exmh_-696087446P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > "Jose M. Alcaide" probably said: > > In ~/.Xdefaults: > > *customization: -color > > And in app-defaults/XTerm-color: > > *termName: xterm-color Well, that's interesting, because I've had that first hack for some years, and I add the contents of $APPDEFAULTS/XTerm-color to my local ~/XTerm file, but this stopped working for me about 6-7 months and two X updates ago. I don't want to set TERM=xterm-color for reasons already stated. > > (you can add "XTerm*termName: xterm-color" to ~/.Xdefaults instead) > > > > Actually, I think that "*termName: xterm-color" should be always defined > > in app-defaults/XTerm-color. Maybe the x11/XFree86-4-clients port should > > apply a patch for doing that, given that FreeBSD has both "xterm" and > > "xterm-color" entries in termcap(5). Both of which are specifically stated to be incorrect (with an explanation why) by the maintainer of XFree86 xterm on his web page. XFree86's 'xterm' is a color xterm, and has been for years. We don't ship their termcap entry. Substituting the XFree86 termcap/terminfo entries for ours apparently fixes the currently broken behaviour. As we apparently have a policy of shipping whatever XFree86 ship: On this topic in <200007190145.SAA20697@mass.osd.bsdi.com>, Mike Smith said: | We've generally maintained that we should ship whatever the XFree86 | people send us. What's their take on this? I don't understand why this is presently borken. > Other OSen do not have xterm-color, though (as has already been > mentioned, Solaris), so this breaks as soon as you ssh to one of these > remote machines. As someone who runs Solaris servers from a FreeBSD > desktop I do this a lot. What he said :) Also, some OS's have an entry for 'xterm-color' that is NOT the XFree86 xterm, but an obsolete xterm variant, and this will also break. > If you tried to make this the default you'd get a lot of very annoyed > people. Exactly. Regards, AS --==_Exmh_-696087446P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 iD8DBQE81YijPHh895bDXeQRAswUAKCx89VXczsIccMfmH59BsUpJth0PQCgslSt Qhxam0ZnZjGHTQ+e81k9CQU= =e8EY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_-696087446P-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 5 12:59: 7 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cicero1.cybercity.dk (cicero1.cybercity.dk [212.242.40.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C993837B400 for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 12:59:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from usr01.netlink.se (usr01.netlink.se [212.242.42.10]) by cicero1.cybercity.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4027A15FD40; Sun, 5 May 2002 21:58:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from thrawn.birch.se (port379.cvx3-mal.ppp.netlink.se [62.66.14.126]) by usr01.netlink.se (8.11.6/8.11.0) with ESMTP id g45JwpO40123; Sun, 5 May 2002 21:58:51 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from thrawn@linux.nu) Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 21:58:49 +0200 (CEST) From: =?iso8859-1?Q?Mattias_Bj=F6rk?= X-X-Sender: thrawn@thrawn.birch.se To: Robby Williamson Cc: Ted Sikora , Subject: Re: Harddisk failure ? In-Reply-To: <000b01c1f2bb$316e6890$0200000a@eclipse> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=iso8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, again Good day to avoid cops. Crawl to school. On Fri, 3 May 2002, Robby Williamson wrote: > howdy guys. > > I have a BP6 with dual 500's. I am using the HPT366 controller and my onl= y > HD is a Seagate ST330630A. I have been running stable since 4.3 on it. I > have had no rebooting problems. yet. =3D/ Hmm I have to fix my m/b with the vtt fix on www.bp6.com. It took me over a year to discover it. I hade to change my powersupply to, that took some time to discover as well. But now everything work except that the discs produce this error, quite irritating. > as far as getting that promise card, I would say not yes, but hell yes.(i= f > your budget can take it) the HPT controller is also notorious for screwin= g > up things in Win NT 5 (2000). But I don't use the promise only the ata33, As I said before. It only panics for me. But I havent tryed it latley so I can't tell if it works with the current stable. But I can get the ata133 controller around 60$ or less and I think that is quite resonable for my budget. > this is where my help gets vague. About 2 months ago I read ( I think it = was > www.hardocp.com ) that there was a problem with IBM drives in that they a= re > only designed to run 8-10 hours a day. This was confirmed by an IBM tech > person. any more time can cause the HD to fail. I assume a HD sending bad > signals could reboot a machine. I will work on getting you a link. I have heard it from other sources as well but I didn't pay mutch to it until now when I hear it from you to. I think that it is fubar, but anyway the best solution is properbly to avoid bying IBM discs in the future. At least IDE discs. I will by western digital instead. Well anyhow thanks for the research and answers once again. BTW I have hade my people that have had problem with the IBM gxp 75 series of discs, That the crashes after a while and you have to send it in to IBM or go to the store where you bought it and wait for a while to get a new one? > --------------------------------------------------------------- > Robby "ThunderCat" Williamson > www.upaboveit.org > "Failure is not an option." > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mattias Bj=F6rk" > To: "Ted Sikora" > Cc: > Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 05:07 > Subject: Re: Harddisk failure ? > > > Hi, > > On Thu, 2 May 2002, Ted Sikora wrote: > > > Mattias Bj=F6rk wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I get this error on one of my harddisc. I have two of the one, its a = ibm > > > gxp 60 60 gb disc. And I always have my computers on, and one day whe= n I > > > entered the room I notice that the machine with the two ibm discs had= e > > > rebooted because my uptime has started from scratch. Im not sure but = I > > > think that this caused the box to reboot. Any that can explain what > might > > > be wrong? I have replaced my gxp 60 60 gb disc with a 75 gxp 40 gb di= sc. > > > And I have not yet seen the problem again. The gxp 60 disc is on the > same > > > cable as a western digital caviar xl 100 gb ata100. I don't know if i= t > > > could be a problem between them? Any how thanks in advance. And is a = bp6 > > > motherboard and I only use the ata33 controller. > > > > > > > It's the BP6 same problem here... resetting ata-x devices constantly... > > then eventually locks up. Started in -stable a few weeks ago. I finally > > put 4.5-Release back. Does it with any HD on the HPT366 or PII in > > -stable > > But Im not using the ata66 controller on the m/b. Im only using the ata33 > controller, see below. Or they are the same chipset? And so what you are > saying is that its not a hardware but a software problem? But sometimes i= t > doesn't lock up. > > I allways have my computer on so I noticed that it hade > rebooted one time sometime under night because when read the uptime it > was wasen't more then 12-24 h something and before it was over 22 days. > > Last time I tried to use my ata66 controler on my bp6 m/b, it kernel > paniced after a very short time if I don't remember wrong. > > host# atacontrol list > ATA channel 0: > Master: ad0 ATA/ATAPI rev 5 > Slave: no device present > ATA channel 1: > Master: ad2 ATA/ATAPI rev 5 > Slave: ad3 ATA/ATAPI rev 5 > ATA channel 2: > Master: no device present > Slave: no device present > ATA channel 3: > Master: no device present > Slave: no device present > > Anyway thanks for the answer, and do you think I will help if a get > another ata controller? Like a ata133 promise controller? > > Mvh Mattias Bj=F6rk > > A dozen, a gross, and a score, > Plus three times the square root of four, > Divided by seven, > Plus five times eleven, > Equals nine squared plus zero, no more. > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 5 13: 0:33 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailout10.sul.t-online.com (mailout10.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC63037B401 for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 13:00:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fwd03.sul.t-online.de by mailout10.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 174SBD-0007ST-0G; Sun, 05 May 2002 22:00:23 +0200 Received: from bender (310048585289-0001@[62.225.210.226]) by fwd03.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 174SB6-26bgDwC; Sun, 5 May 2002 22:00:16 +0200 Message-ID: <003f01c1f46f$8767ab70$594bfea9@bender> From: Jeff.Kelly@t-online.de (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Christian_Fl=FCgel?=) To: References: <20020430224551.A2720@walnut.hh59.local> <20020501004850.A5123@walnut.hh59.local> <20020504234843.A35744@walnut.hh59.local> Subject: Re: /dev/dsp: Device busy Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 22:00:38 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Sender: 310048585289-0001@t-dialin.net Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Just a me too. Todays upgrade to stable broke it: mpg123 somemp3.mp3 /dev/dsp: Device busy Regards Christian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 5 13:15:14 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from 12-234-22-238.client.attbi.com (12-234-90-219.client.attbi.com [12.234.90.219]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5457037B403 for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 13:14:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from master.gorean.org (master.gorean.org [10.0.0.2]) by 12-234-22-238.client.attbi.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g45KEtPp093648; Sun, 5 May 2002 13:14:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by master.gorean.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) with ESMTP id g45KEsqQ003336; Sun, 5 May 2002 13:14:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 13:14:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton To: Makoto Matsushita Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: BIND in -stable In-Reply-To: <20020505152552H.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: <20020505131442.U3321-100000@master.gorean.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 5 May 2002, Makoto Matsushita wrote: > Just FYI: nsupdate(8) bundled with BIND 8.3.1 is known as *broken*. How is it broken? -- "We have known freedom's price. We have shown freedom's power. And in this great conflict, ... we will see freedom's victory." - George W. Bush, President of the United States State of the Union, January 28, 2002 Do YOU Yahoo!? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 5 13:16:29 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from TheWorld.com (pcls4.std.com [199.172.62.106]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A19937B445; Sun, 5 May 2002 13:15:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shell.TheWorld.com (root@shell01.TheWorld.com [199.172.62.241]) by TheWorld.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA03297; Sun, 5 May 2002 16:15:38 -0400 Received: (from kwc@localhost) by shell.TheWorld.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id QAA1040865; Sun, 5 May 2002 16:15:37 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 16:15:37 -0400 (EDT) From: Kenneth W Cochran Message-Id: <200205052015.QAA1040865@shell.TheWorld.com> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: xchat-1.8.8 segfaulting on -stable Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello: Xchat has started segfaulting & coredumping here. Until the past few days, xchat has been trouble-free. OS: 4.5-stable as of 2002/05/01 just before the 4.6-prerelease commit Ports tree: updated 2002/05/05 & all dependencies/versions up-to-date, except as noted below xchat is 1.8.8 XFree86 is still 4.1.0_10 Seems the segfaulting didn't start until after 2002/05/01 (when I updated the base OS), otherwise xchat has worked fine. The segfault appears to be happening when I try to connect to an IRC server. Any idea(s) as to what's happening & how to repair? Thanks, -kc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 5 13:17: 3 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from 12-234-22-238.client.attbi.com (12-234-90-219.client.attbi.com [12.234.90.219]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AB8337B400 for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 13:16:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from master.gorean.org (master.gorean.org [10.0.0.2]) by 12-234-22-238.client.attbi.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g45KGnPp093657; Sun, 5 May 2002 13:16:50 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from DougB@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost (doug@localhost) by master.gorean.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) with ESMTP id g45KGkej003339; Sun, 5 May 2002 13:16:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 5 May 2002 13:16:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton To: Hajimu UMEMOTO Cc: Makoto Matsushita , Subject: Re: BIND in -stable In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20020505131515.M3321-100000@master.gorean.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, 5 May 2002, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > nslookup of BIND 8.3.1 has another problem. If you put IPv6 address > for nameserver in /etc/resolv.conf, you cannot use nslookup at all. A) nslookup is a truly horrible tool, and shouldn't be used by anyone, ever. B) While I understand they are important to you, IPv6 issues are not important to a substantial majority of our userbase. Also, IPv6 support in bind 8 is limited anyways. Those how need IPv6 features should really be using bind 9. -- "We have known freedom's price. We have shown freedom's power. And in this great conflict, ... we will see freedom's victory." - George W. Bush, President of the United States State of the Union, January 28, 2002 Do YOU Yahoo!? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 5 13:34:29 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from cheer.mahoroba.org (flets19-004.kamome.or.jp [218.45.19.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1708837B400; Sun, 5 May 2002 13:34:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mille.mahoroba.org (IDENT:nqPk6/0aLgxKdDb3R9ydg060RsaZvDKB/cuxWj3bPzPLWSQxXipXNIt37EDt7gBL@mille.mahoroba.org [IPv6:2001:200:301:0:202:2dff:fe0a:6bee]) (user=ume mech=CRAM-MD5 bits=0) by cheer.mahoroba.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP/inet6 id g45KYMLR026207 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 6 May 2002 05:34:22 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from ume@mahoroba.org) Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 05:34:12 +0900 Message-ID: From: Hajimu UMEMOTO To: Doug Barton Cc: Hajimu UMEMOTO , Makoto Matsushita , Subject: Re: BIND in -stable In-Reply-To: <20020505131515.M3321-100000@master.gorean.org> References: <20020505131515.M3321-100000@master.gorean.org> User-Agent: xcite1.38> Wanderlust/2.8.1 (Something) SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.3 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Unebigory=F2mae?=) APEL/10.3 Emacs/21.2 (i386--freebsd) MULE/5.0 (=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOC1MWhsoQg==?=) X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.6-PRERELEASE MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.3 - "Ushinoya") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS-perl11-milter (http://amavis.org/) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, >>>>> On Sun, 5 May 2002 13:16:46 -0700 (PDT) >>>>> Doug Barton said: > nslookup of BIND 8.3.1 has another problem. If you put IPv6 address > for nameserver in /etc/resolv.conf, you cannot use nslookup at all. DougB> A) nslookup is a truly horrible tool, and shouldn't be used by DougB> anyone, ever. B) While I understand they are important to you, IPv6 issues DougB> are not important to a substantial majority of our userbase. Also, IPv6 DougB> support in bind 8 is limited anyways. Those how need IPv6 features should DougB> really be using bind 9. Yes, those who expect full support of an IPv6 should use BIND9. I don't mean expecting full support of an IPv6 to BIND8. However, if we put following lines in /etc/resolv.conf: nameserver nameserver 8.2.X of nslookup simply ignored an IPv6 line and did query to IPv4 address. 8.3.X of nslookup doesn't ignore an IPv6 line due to an IPv6 awareness of libbind and try to query to 0.0.0.0 which is dummy nsaddr_list entry for an IPv6 entry. -- Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan ume@mahoroba.org ume@bisd.hitachi.co.jp ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org http://www.imasy.org/~ume/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 5 13:35:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mta5.snfc21.pbi.net (mta5.snfc21.pbi.net [206.13.28.241]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEA4F37B400; Sun, 5 May 2002 13:34:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from yahoo.com ([64.173.9.201]) by mta5.snfc21.pbi.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 (built May 7 2001)) with ESMTP id <0GVN00A2ZNPZ4F@mta5.snfc21.pbi.net>; Sun, 05 May 2002 13:34:31 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 05 May 2002 13:37:10 -0700 From: Chair of 3G02/Globecom03/VTC03 Subject: 3Gwireless'2002 & 4G Mobile Forum Kickoff Message-id: <3CD597F6.A3A4A094@yahoo.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Win98; U) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en To: undisclosed-recipients:; Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Dear colleagues: The important 3Gwireless'2002 and 4Gmobile Forum kickoff are just weeks to go. To get involved in the intensive technical discussions and strategies on 3G/4G, please reserve your seat right now at: http://wirelesscongress.com or http://delson.org/wc. Welcome on board and secure your leadership in this emerging wireless communication. Thank you. Office of Chairman 3G02/WWC02 http://wirelesscongress.com PS: Limited number of conference records are freely available to government agencies, public library and wireless authorities. Contact the conference for details. [Sorry for multiple copies of this message. This is only one-time transmission for technical info only. Complete removal is automatic. Thanks for your support for the promotion of education and research.] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 5 14:32:21 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from drugs.dv.isc.org (drugs.dv.isc.org [130.155.191.236]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A9AF37B409 for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 14:32:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from isc.org (localhost.dv.isc.org [127.0.0.1]) by drugs.dv.isc.org (8.11.6/8.11.2) with ESMTP id g45LVYx60743; Mon, 6 May 2002 07:31:37 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from marka@isc.org) Message-Id: <200205052131.g45LVYx60743@drugs.dv.isc.org> To: Hajimu UMEMOTO Cc: Makoto Matsushita , stable@FreeBSD.org From: Mark.Andrews@isc.org Subject: Re: BIND in -stable In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 05 May 2002 20:18:12 +0900." Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 07:31:34 +1000 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Hi, > > >>> Sun, 05 May 2002 15:25:52 +0900 $B$N9o$K!V(Bmatusita$B!W!"$9$J$o$A(B > >>> Makoto Matsushita $B;a[)$/(B > > matusita> Just FYI: nsupdate(8) bundled with BIND 8.3.1 is known as *broken*. > matusita> If 4.6-RELEASE is out, all nsupdate(8) users will confuse that it > matusita> dosn't work as expected. BIND 8.3.2 (if released) fixes this probl > em. > > matusita> ISC doesn't allow us to fix this problem to FreeBSD's BIND 8.3.1, s > o > matusita> 4.6-RELEASE's nsupdate(8) is broken also. Still you want to say al > l > matusita> users should upgrade their BIND 8.2.4 to 8.3.1? :-) > > nslookup of BIND 8.3.1 has another problem. If you put IPv6 address > for nameserver in /etc/resolv.conf, you cannot use nslookup at all. > This is because libbind supports IPv6 but nslookup doesn't. > I have a workaround patch to avoild this problem. However, I have not > sent it to ISC, yet. This is fixed in 8.3.2 along with dig, host etc. > > Sincerely, > > -- > Hajimu UMEMOTO @ Internet Mutual Aid Society Yokohama, Japan > ume@mahoroba.org ume@bisd.hitachi.co.jp ume@{,jp.}FreeBSD.org > http://www.imasy.org/~ume/ > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message -- Mark Andrews, Internet Software Consortium 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: Mark.Andrews@isc.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 5 15:53:45 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.liwing.de (mail.liwing.de [213.70.188.162]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E554C37B406 for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 15:53:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 1351 invoked from network); 5 May 2002 23:02:56 -0000 Received: from stingray.liwing.de (HELO liwing.de) ([213.70.188.164]) (envelope-sender ) by mail.liwing.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 5 May 2002 23:02:56 -0000 Message-ID: <3CD5B662.26298116@liwing.de> Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 00:46:58 +0200 From: Jens Rehsack Organization: LiWing IT-Services X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Karsten W. Rohrbach" Cc: Michael Riexinger , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfilter problem References: <20020504223450.GA1025@grind.grind.dom> <20020505152314.B73550@mail.webmonster.de> <20020505133204.GA667@grind.grind.dom> <20020505184630.A76286@mail.webmonster.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Karsten W. Rohrbach" wrote: > > Michael Riexinger(mailinglists@grindking.de)@2002.05.05 15:32:04 +0000: > > On Sun May 5 15:23:14 2002, Karsten W. Rohrbach wrote: > > > the problem can only be analyzed efficiently if you show us the rest of > > > the ruleset. anything else is pure guesswork, based on assumptions about > > > your ipf configuration. > > > > > > regards, > > > /k > > Ok, here they are. But I wonder why it worked withot problems with > > previous versions of FreeBSD/ipfilter. With netstat I can see FIN_WAIT_1 > > states to the newsserver. > > (tcp4 0 0 dialin-212-144-1.49368 news.fu-berlin.d.nntp > > FIN_WAIT_1) > > > > > > pass in quick on lo0 all > > pass out quick on lo0 all > > > > pass in quick on ed0 all > > pass out quick on ed0 all > > > > pass out quick on isp0 proto tcp/udp from any to any keep state > > pass out quick on isp0 proto tcp from any to any flags S/SA keep state > pass out quick on isp0 proto udp from any to any keep state I don't use the flags, but my ruleset works. But I have seen many times (others and me, too) that being confused about the "last rule match" and the "quick leaves promptly" behaviour. I do following: I write all global rules at the top of the file/section, in this case the 3 lines with "return-unr". Then I specialize in the next lines using "quick" rules. This works, if I do not write it after the 4th beer. But sometimes even then ;-) Jens > > instead of the above one line should work. if it doesn't then give me a > slap on the head, i'm still a bit drunk from yesterday ;-) > > > pass out quick on isp0 proto icmp from any to any keep state > > > > pass in quick on isp0 proto tcp from any to any port = 80 > > pass in quick on isp0 proto tcp from any to any port = 60000 > > > > block return-icmp-as-dest(host-unr) in log quick on isp0 proto icmp from > > any to any > > block return-rst in log quick on isp0 proto tcp from any to any > > block return-icmp(port-unr) in log quick on isp0 proto udp from any to > > any > > > > 'ipfstat -s' on your box will tell you about state statistics. > > when you reload your rule set for testing, you should invoke it like > 'ipf -Fa -FS -f/etc/ipf.rules' or similar, just to kick out the old > state table. > > 'ipfstat -t' gives you a "top" style display of current states, so you > can check them in realtime. > > regards, > /k > > -- > > MCSE: Minesweeper Consultant & Solitaire Engineer > WebMonster Community Project -- Next Generation Networks GmbH -- All on BSD > http://www.webmonster.de/ -- ftp://ftp.webmonster.de/ -- http://www.ngenn.net/ > GnuPG: 0xDEC948A6 D/E BF11 83E8 84A1 F996 68B4 A113 B393 6BF4 DEC9 48A6 > REVOKED: 0x2964BF46 D/E 42F9 9FFF 50D4 2F38 DBEE DF22 3340 4F4E 2964 BF46 > REVOKED: 0x4C44DA59 RSA F9 A0 DF 91 74 07 6A 1C 5F 0B E0 6B 4D CD 8C 44 > My mail is GnuPG signed -- Unsigned ones are bogus -- http://www.gnupg.org/ > Please do not remove my address from To: and Cc: fields in mailing lists. 10x > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature -- L i W W W i Jens Rehsack L W W W L i W W W W i nnn gggg LiWing IT-Services L i W W W W i n n g g LLLL i W W i n n g g Friesenstraße 2 gggg 06112 Halle g g g Tel.: +49 - 3 45 - 5 17 05 91 ggg e-Mail: Fax: +49 - 3 45 - 5 17 05 92 http://www.liwing.de/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 5 17: 8: 9 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.webmonster.de (datasink.webmonster.de [194.162.162.209]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 91B7137B401 for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 17:07:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 82969 invoked by uid 1000); 6 May 2002 00:08:20 -0000 Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 02:08:20 +0200 From: "Karsten W. Rohrbach" To: Jens Rehsack Cc: Michael Riexinger , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfilter problem Message-ID: <20020506020820.A82377@mail.webmonster.de> References: <20020504223450.GA1025@grind.grind.dom> <20020505152314.B73550@mail.webmonster.de> <20020505133204.GA667@grind.grind.dom> <20020505184630.A76286@mail.webmonster.de> <3CD5B662.26298116@liwing.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <3CD5B662.26298116@liwing.de>; from rehsack@liwing.de on Mon, May 06, 2002 at 12:46:58AM +0200 X-Arbitrary-Number-Of-The-Day: 42 X-URL: http://www.webmonster.de/ X-Disclaimer: My opinions do not necessarily represent those of my employer X-Work-URL: http://www.ngenn.net/ X-Work-Address: nGENn GmbH, Schloss Kransberg, D-61250 Usingen-Kransberg, Germany X-Work-Phone: +49-6081-682-304 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jens Rehsack(rehsack@liwing.de)@2002.05.06 00:46:58 +0000: > "Karsten W. Rohrbach" wrote: > >=20 > > Michael Riexinger(mailinglists@grindking.de)@2002.05.05 15:32:04 +0000: > > > On Sun May 5 15:23:14 2002, Karsten W. Rohrbach wrote: > > > > the problem can only be analyzed efficiently if you show us the res= t of > > > > the ruleset. anything else is pure guesswork, based on assumptions = about > > > > your ipf configuration. > > > > > > > > regards, > > > > /k > > > Ok, here they are. But I wonder why it worked withot problems with > > > previous versions of FreeBSD/ipfilter. With netstat I can see FIN_WAI= T_1 > > > states to the newsserver. > > > (tcp4 0 0 dialin-212-144-1.49368 news.fu-berlin.d.nntp > > > FIN_WAIT_1) > > > > > > > > > pass in quick on lo0 all > > > pass out quick on lo0 all > > > > > > pass in quick on ed0 all > > > pass out quick on ed0 all > > > > > > pass out quick on isp0 proto tcp/udp from any to any keep state > >=20 > > pass out quick on isp0 proto tcp from any to any flags S/SA keep state > > pass out quick on isp0 proto udp from any to any keep state > I don't use the flags, but my ruleset works. But I have seen many times > (others and me, too) that being confused about the "last rule match" and > the "quick leaves promptly" behaviour. >=20 > I do following: I write all global rules at the top of the file/section, > in this case the 3 lines with "return-unr". Then I specialize in the next > lines using "quick" rules. that's a matter of style, not functionality. i can hardly see the improvements for a 10 line ruleset here. all entries are "quick", so they get matched from top to bottom. the order of processing for non-quick rules is somewhat different (and affects processing speed, but that's not the issue here). having a flat matching strategy in a "personal firewall" style rule set is pretty intuitive, compared to "global"/"quick" mix'n'match or grouped sub rule sets, but hey, it's his dsl/isdn router and no rocket science... opposing to your apparent ideas, i implement firewall policies the following way: - as simple as possible - documented - structured by access groups/protocols/services, or both, or all three - optimized for performance by rule groups, if applicable the main problem here might be that he just had _one_ line for _both_ protocols, tcp and udp, which might lead to trouble in several points. that's a totally different thing. > This works, if I do not write it after the 4th beer. But sometimes even t= hen ;-) =2E..and makes things more complicated by sticking to different rule matching strategies in a set of 10 or some rules. i can see your point with the beer, but what do you do after the 8th one, being confronted with your own rulesets? > > instead of the above one line should work. if it doesn't then give me a > > slap on the head, i'm still a bit drunk from yesterday ;-) > >=20 > > > pass out quick on isp0 proto icmp from any to any keep state > > > > > > pass in quick on isp0 proto tcp from any to any port =3D 80 > > > pass in quick on isp0 proto tcp from any to any port =3D 60000 > > > > > > block return-icmp-as-dest(host-unr) in log quick on isp0 proto icmp f= rom > > > any to any > > > block return-rst in log quick on isp0 proto tcp from any to any > > > block return-icmp(port-unr) in log quick on isp0 proto udp from any to > > > any > > > > >=20 > > 'ipfstat -s' on your box will tell you about state statistics. > >=20 > > when you reload your rule set for testing, you should invoke it like > > 'ipf -Fa -FS -f/etc/ipf.rules' or similar, just to kick out the old > > state table. > >=20 > > 'ipfstat -t' gives you a "top" style display of current states, so you > > can check them in realtime. regards, /k --=20 > Wenn in der Kueche alles stimmt, geht auch die Musik in Ordnung. WebMonster Community Project -- Next Generation Networks GmbH -- All on BSD http://www.webmonster.de/ -- ftp://ftp.webmonster.de/ -- http://www.ngenn.n= et/ GnuPG: 0xDEC948A6 D/E BF11 83E8 84A1 F996 68B4 A113 B393 6BF4 DEC9 48A6 REVOKED: 0x2964BF46 D/E 42F9 9FFF 50D4 2F38 DBEE DF22 3340 4F4E 2964 BF46 REVOKED: 0x4C44DA59 RSA F9 A0 DF 91 74 07 6A 1C 5F 0B E0 6B 4D CD 8C 44 My mail is GnuPG signed -- Unsigned ones are bogus -- http://www.gnupg.org/ Please do not remove my address from To: and Cc: fields in mailing lists. 1= 0x --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD4DBQE81cl0s5Nr9N7JSKYRAuRyAJjZGUoxuGwh8QB/BUh0fL+HGue1AJ47gXE/ 5ZYsvydQFIgJZTmOhaU8Qg== =5PA2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 5 21: 9:58 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (castle.jp.FreeBSD.org [210.226.20.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2761537B401 for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 21:09:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [::1]) by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.3) with ESMTP/inet6 id g4649sf55611 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 13:09:54 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org) In-Reply-To: <200205052131.g45LVYx60743@drugs.dv.isc.org> References: <200205052131.g45LVYx60743@drugs.dv.isc.org> X-User-Agent: Mew/1.94.2 XEmacs/21.5 (bamboo) X-FaceAnim: (-O_O-)(O_O- )(_O- )(O- )(- -)( -O)( -O_)( -O_O)(-O_O-) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 7 From: Makoto Matsushita To: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: BIND in -stable Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 13:09:53 +0900 Message-Id: <20020506130953S.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mark.Andrews> This is fixed in 8.3.2 along with dig, host etc. Anybody knows when 8.3.2 is out? -- - Makoto `MAR' Matsushita To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 5 21:17:51 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (castle.jp.FreeBSD.org [210.226.20.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FBB137B406; Sun, 5 May 2002 21:17:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [::1]) by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.3) with ESMTP/inet6 id g464Hlf56837; Mon, 6 May 2002 13:17:47 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org) Cc: matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <20020505131442.U3321-100000@master.gorean.org> References: <20020505152552H.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> <20020505131442.U3321-100000@master.gorean.org> X-User-Agent: Mew/1.94.2 XEmacs/21.5 (bamboo) X-FaceAnim: (-O_O-)(O_O- )(_O- )(O- )(- -)( -O)( -O_)( -O_O)(-O_O-) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 17 From: Makoto Matsushita To: DougB@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: BIND in -stable Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 13:17:43 +0900 Message-Id: <20020506131743B.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG DougB> How is it broken? It is already fixed in current BIND 8.x code. I have a patch to fix this (made by ISC), but ISC stops to release this patch to FreeBSD, so we FreeBSD cannot fix this problem until 8.3.2 is out. I tried to contact ISC yesterday again, that FreeBSD 4.6-RELEASE is patched to work nsupdate(8), but ISC refuses my email since 61.0.0.0/8 network address block users are all spammers. I know that I have a chance to put my address block to their "whitelist", but I can't bear to go down on my knees to ISC (who defines ISC is so great organization?). -- - Makoto `MAR' Matsushita To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sun May 5 22: 5:33 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from deborah.paradise.net.nz (deborah.paradise.net.nz [203.96.152.32]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97FBF37B406 for ; Sun, 5 May 2002 22:05:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from saturn (203-79-98-113.tnt13.paradise.net.nz [203.79.98.113]) by deborah.paradise.net.nz (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2DCED49E7; Mon, 6 May 2002 17:05:22 +1200 (NZST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: James Pole Organization: None To: Kenneth W Cochran Subject: Re: xchat-1.8.8 segfaulting on -stable Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 17:05:17 +1200 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4] References: <200205052015.QAA1040865@shell.TheWorld.com> In-Reply-To: <200205052015.QAA1040865@shell.TheWorld.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200205061705.17448.james.pole@paradise.net.nz> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 06 May 2002 08:15, Kenneth W Cochran wrote: > Hello: > > Xchat has started segfaulting & coredumping here. > Until the past few days, xchat has been trouble-free. xchat-1.8.8 works fine for me (I'm using FreeBSD 4.6-PRERELEASE and XFree= 86=20 4.2.0). Have you tried recompiling xchat? - James --=20 James Pole - www.jamespole.cjb.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 0:25:13 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freebsd.dk (fw-rl0.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.114]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 018F637B406; Mon, 6 May 2002 00:25:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from sos@localhost) by freebsd.dk (8.12.2/8.12.2) id g467P5HX021132; Mon, 6 May 2002 09:25:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sos) From: Søren Schmidt Message-Id: <200205060725.g467P5HX021132@freebsd.dk> Subject: Re: ata(4) -STABLE subsystem and tags MFC In-Reply-To: <20020505172814.N39434-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> To: Dmitry Morozovsky Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 09:25:05 +0200 (CEST) Cc: sos@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Reply-To: sos@freebsd.dk X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL94b (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG It seems Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > Hello there Soren, > > any chances patch for ata subsystem at > > date: 2002/04/18 19:11:45; > > that fixes tagged support for ata(4) will be MFC'd before 4.6-R? If you mean the patch that went into -current it doesn't apply to the -stable branch at all, it fixed a problem introduced by the busdma integration, not the problem that apparently hit some on -stable. -Søren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 0:35:46 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from polaris.we.lc.ehu.es (polaris.we.lc.ehu.es [158.227.6.43]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 663B337B408 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 00:35:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from v-ger.we.lc.ehu.es (v-ger [158.227.6.51]) by polaris.we.lc.ehu.es (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g467Z1H13724; Mon, 6 May 2002 09:35:01 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from jose@localhost) by v-ger.we.lc.ehu.es (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g467ZmN00626; Mon, 6 May 2002 09:35:48 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jose) Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 09:35:48 +0200 From: "Jose M. Alcaide" To: Andy Sparrow Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/mail/mutt-devel Makefile Message-ID: <20020506093548.C236@v-ger.we.lc.ehu.es> References: <20020505183918.GA27835@pir.net> <20020505193147.C60593E14@CRWdog.demon.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20020505193147.C60593E14@CRWdog.demon.co.uk>; from spadger@best.com on Sun, May 05, 2002 at 03:31:47PM -0400 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 03:31:47PM -0400, Andy Sparrow wrote: > Both of which are specifically stated to be incorrect (with an explanation > why) by the maintainer of XFree86 xterm on his web page. > > XFree86's 'xterm' is a color xterm, and has been for years. We don't ship > their termcap entry. > > Substituting the XFree86 termcap/terminfo entries for ours apparently fixes > the currently broken behaviour. Yes, but other people does not like some "features" of the xterm termcap entry supplied by XFree86. > > Other OSen do not have xterm-color, though (as has already been > > mentioned, Solaris), so this breaks as soon as you ssh to one of these > > remote machines. As someone who runs Solaris servers from a FreeBSD > > desktop I do this a lot. > > What he said :) > > Also, some OS's have an entry for 'xterm-color' that is NOT the XFree86 xterm, > but an obsolete xterm variant, and this will also break. And I absolutely agree. In fact we also have Solaris and Irix machines, which I hacked (adding a xterm-color entry, or redefining TERM in the session startup scripts). What I wanted to say is that defining termName in XTerm-color is *coherent* with FreeBSD having two distinct termcap xterm entries: mono and color. However, I also think that having those two entries is *bad*. IMHO, the xterm and xterm-color entries should be merged in only one xterm supporting color. Cheers, JMA -- ****** Jose M. Alcaide // jose@we.lc.ehu.es // jmas@FreeBSD.org ****** ** "Beware of Programmers who carry screwdrivers" -- Leonard Brandwein ** To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 2: 3:25 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.liwing.de (mail.liwing.de [213.70.188.162]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6253637B405 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 02:03:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 47101 invoked from network); 6 May 2002 09:12:23 -0000 Received: from stingray.liwing.de (HELO liwing.de) ([213.70.188.164]) (envelope-sender ) by mail.liwing.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 6 May 2002 09:12:23 -0000 Message-ID: <3CD64534.672CD6A7@liwing.de> Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 10:56:20 +0200 From: Jens Rehsack Organization: LiWing IT-Services X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Karsten W. Rohrbach" Cc: Michael Riexinger , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfilter problem References: <20020504223450.GA1025@grind.grind.dom> <20020505152314.B73550@mail.webmonster.de> <20020505133204.GA667@grind.grind.dom> <20020505184630.A76286@mail.webmonster.de> <3CD5B662.26298116@liwing.de> <20020506020820.A82377@mail.webmonster.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > I do following: I write all global rules at the top of the file/section, > > in this case the 3 lines with "return-unr". Then I specialize in the next > > lines using "quick" rules. > > that's a matter of style, not functionality. i can hardly see the > improvements for a 10 line ruleset here. all entries are "quick", so I do not use more rules as required. Usually I use as less as possible, but sometimes it's better to duplicate sth. to improve readability. > they get matched from top to bottom. the order of processing for > non-quick rules is somewhat different (and affects processing speed, > but that's not the issue here). having a flat matching strategy in a > "personal firewall" style rule set is pretty intuitive, compared to > "global"/"quick" mix'n'match or grouped sub rule sets, but hey, it's his > dsl/isdn router and no rocket science... I have several ethernet/DSL-routers and a ethernet / dedicated line firewall. They all work fine, but I detected some problems with "keep state" when I write some oppositional rules after another, f.e. pass in quick on isp0 proto tcp from any to any port = 80 keep state block in quick all Because of the position of the dynamic added rule there seems sometimes problems... I do not know exactly, I didn't wrote the ipfilter code, cause I'm not darren. I can only tell, what expiriences I made. block in all pass in quick on isp0 proto tcp from any to any port = 80 keep state Does the same as above, but it's really more intuitive (for me): block in all except to (port 80/tcp [, ...]), they are ok. > opposing to your apparent ideas, i implement firewall policies the > following way: > - as simple as possible We all have our own way to understand, to write and to do. > - documented Me too. > - structured by access groups/protocols/services, or both, or all three As required if any changes should be made later ... > - optimized for performance by rule groups, if applicable I hope in that order! > the main problem here might be that he just had _one_ line for _both_ > protocols, tcp and udp, which might lead to trouble in several points. > that's a totally different thing. I have this too, and there is no problem anywhere. Of course, it could be. But I got the idea of changed position of dynamic rules inserting (could be speed up permormance, AFAIK, depending on internal structures). > > This works, if I do not write it after the 4th beer. But sometimes even then ;-) > > ...and makes things more complicated by sticking to different rule > matching strategies in a set of 10 or some rules. i can see your point > with the beer, but what do you do after the 8th one, being confronted > with your own rulesets? Reading is ok, understanding is ok (as long I can identify the letters :-)), but nevertheless I will not write a ruleset to late and use without checking it next morning. Jens -- L i W W W i Jens Rehsack L W W W L i W W W W i nnn gggg LiWing IT-Services L i W W W W i n n g g LLLL i W W i n n g g Friesenstraße 2 gggg 06112 Halle g g g Tel.: +49 - 3 45 - 5 17 05 91 ggg e-Mail: Fax: +49 - 3 45 - 5 17 05 92 http://www.liwing.de/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 2:14: 4 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.liwing.de (mail.liwing.de [213.70.188.162]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6198037B407 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 02:13:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 49708 invoked from network); 6 May 2002 09:23:16 -0000 Received: from stingray.liwing.de (HELO liwing.de) ([213.70.188.164]) (envelope-sender ) by mail.liwing.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 6 May 2002 09:23:16 -0000 Message-ID: <3CD647C1.820E9321@liwing.de> Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 11:07:13 +0200 From: Jens Rehsack Organization: LiWing IT-Services X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Who should/could send mail to this list ... Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, yesterday I see a discussion here where it had been recommented to close all lists except questions@freebsd.org for non-list-members. Because I do not this this is useful, because I need 18 month to learn enough w/o reading the list to can do many things without ever ask for mommy ..., and I do not think it's ok to give other people not the same change to learn at their own way ... I've seen last how php.net handles that. Anyone who sends a message first must authenticate it's request be responding an auth-request from the list-server. This is a similar auth-req. like I got it from majordomo@freebsd.org, but it's required without need to be subscribed ... I think this could be a good way to avoid spam. So long, Jens -- L i W W W i Jens Rehsack L W W W L i W W W W i nnn gggg LiWing IT-Services L i W W W W i n n g g LLLL i W W i n n g g Friesenstraße 2 gggg 06112 Halle g g g Tel.: +49 - 3 45 - 5 17 05 91 ggg e-Mail: Fax: +49 - 3 45 - 5 17 05 92 http://www.liwing.de/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 2:45:50 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.webmonster.de (datasink.webmonster.de [194.162.162.209]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C6C3837B409 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 02:45:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 92568 invoked by uid 1000); 6 May 2002 09:45:55 -0000 Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 11:45:55 +0200 From: "Karsten W. Rohrbach" To: Jens Rehsack Cc: Michael Riexinger , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfilter problem Message-ID: <20020506114555.C91849@mail.webmonster.de> References: <20020504223450.GA1025@grind.grind.dom> <20020505152314.B73550@mail.webmonster.de> <20020505133204.GA667@grind.grind.dom> <20020505184630.A76286@mail.webmonster.de> <3CD5B662.26298116@liwing.de> <20020506020820.A82377@mail.webmonster.de> <3CD64534.672CD6A7@liwing.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <3CD64534.672CD6A7@liwing.de>; from rehsack@liwing.de on Mon, May 06, 2002 at 10:56:20AM +0200 X-Arbitrary-Number-Of-The-Day: 42 X-URL: http://www.webmonster.de/ X-Disclaimer: My opinions do not necessarily represent those of my employer X-Work-URL: http://www.ngenn.net/ X-Work-Address: nGENn GmbH, Schloss Kransberg, D-61250 Usingen-Kransberg, Germany X-Work-Phone: +49-6081-682-304 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable for michael's setup i'd add the following at the very beginning of the rule set: # block packets with ip options / short tcp packets block in log quick on isp0 from any to any with ipopts block in log quick on isp0 proto tcp from any to any with short just to be more complete. IIRC, these ones are covered somewhere in the FAQ. Jens Rehsack(rehsack@liwing.de)@2002.05.06 10:56:20 +0000: > Because of the position of the dynamic added rule there seems sometimes p= roblems... huh? on ipfilter dynamic rules are always processed before the actual rule set you supply. the definition of "dynamic rules" for ipf is "state". see http://coombs.anu.edu.au/~avalon/ipfil-flow.html it is a matter of _how_ you add state, please read on. > block in all block in on isp0 all # if you just want to block incoming traffic # from the isdn interface > pass in quick on isp0 proto tcp from any to any port =3D 80 keep state pass in quick on isp0 proto tcp from any to any port =3D 80 flags S/SA keep= state # we want state added when establishing a # session, not for every tcp packet that passes # this rule you're perfectly right in this scenario where you allow packets to pass with "quick" rules and do a general "block all" rule that isn't "quick". for people new to ipfilter, it is quite a challenge to get the concept of its two ways of processing rules ("quick" vs. "last match"), that's why i try to stick to linear "quick" setups for trivial things such as a simple gateway firewall. > Does the same as above, but it's really more intuitive (for me): > block in all except to (port 80/tcp [, ...]), they are ok. adding tcp packet state without matching tcp flags causes that you add a state for every subsequent packet in a session. this doesn't really make sense. don't try your rules on a live firewall with a heavily loaded web server behind it - your state table will fill up quite fast ;-) > > the main problem here might be that he just had _one_ line for _both_ > > protocols, tcp and udp, which might lead to trouble in several points. > > that's a totally different thing. > I have this too, and there is no problem anywhere. Of course, it could be. from my experiences (with firewall code different to ipfilter), it often is a problem if you combine protocols in one rule. think about how tcp and udp state is kept; it's a totally different story for both protocols. in ipfilter, tcp can be tracked easily because tcp already has state. udp is tracked by states that simply time out at some point in time with a somewhat different strategy, udp being stateless in its nature. bottom line:=20 two protocols -> two different concepts of processing =3D two different rules > But I got the idea of changed position of dynamic rules inserting (could > be speed up permormance, AFAIK, depending on internal structures). yup, but you need quite some throughput to really notice a difference... on an isdn router you will hardly notice a difference, it's limited to one or some channels of 64kbit/s which is a piece of cake for nearly every modern firewall implementation out there. > Reading is ok, understanding is ok (as long I can identify the letters :-= )), but > nevertheless I will not write a ruleset to late and use without checking = it > next morning. heh, yep... also, as a sidenote, ipftest(1) is your friend, regardless of the level of intoxication ;-) regards, /k --=20 > Microsoft isn't the answer. Microsoft is the question, and the answer is = no. WebMonster Community Project -- Next Generation Networks GmbH -- All on BSD http://www.webmonster.de/ -- ftp://ftp.webmonster.de/ -- http://www.ngenn.n= et/ GnuPG: 0xDEC948A6 D/E BF11 83E8 84A1 F996 68B4 A113 B393 6BF4 DEC9 48A6 REVOKED: 0x2964BF46 D/E 42F9 9FFF 50D4 2F38 DBEE DF22 3340 4F4E 2964 BF46 REVOKED: 0x4C44DA59 RSA F9 A0 DF 91 74 07 6A 1C 5F 0B E0 6B 4D CD 8C 44 My mail is GnuPG signed -- Unsigned ones are bogus -- http://www.gnupg.org/ Please do not remove my address from To: and Cc: fields in mailing lists. 1= 0x --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE81lDTs5Nr9N7JSKYRAj9iAJ97dnJZSB6AAN9/qu32e3+J7I1eRACgokM6 FdHDtRu5qzxpbS4GxFXiRN0= =cXqt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 2:52:21 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.webmonster.de (datasink.webmonster.de [194.162.162.209]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5AC7037B406 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 02:52:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 92675 invoked by uid 1000); 6 May 2002 09:52:35 -0000 Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 11:52:35 +0200 From: "Karsten W. Rohrbach" To: Jens Rehsack Cc: questions@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Who should/could send mail to this list ... Message-ID: <20020506115235.D91849@mail.webmonster.de> References: <3CD647C1.820E9321@liwing.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="24zk1gE8NUlDmwG9" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <3CD647C1.820E9321@liwing.de>; from rehsack@liwing.de on Mon, May 06, 2002 at 11:07:13AM +0200 X-Arbitrary-Number-Of-The-Day: 42 X-URL: http://www.webmonster.de/ X-Disclaimer: My opinions do not necessarily represent those of my employer X-Work-URL: http://www.ngenn.net/ X-Work-Address: nGENn GmbH, Schloss Kransberg, D-61250 Usingen-Kransberg, Germany X-Work-Phone: +49-6081-682-304 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --24zk1gE8NUlDmwG9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jens Rehsack(rehsack@liwing.de)@2002.05.06 11:07:13 +0000: > Hi, >=20 > I've seen last how php.net handles that. Anyone who sends a message > first must authenticate it's request be responding an auth-request > from the list-server. This is a similar auth-req. like I got it > from majordomo@freebsd.org, but it's required without need to be > subscribed ... >=20 > I think this could be a good way to avoid spam. this is dependent on list server software and/or addition software running on the mail server distributing the lists. regardless of a list being generally open or subscriber-post-only, it is not an easy thing to implement on high-volume list servers. "plugging in" tmda or similar software imposes a heavy load, for it being invoked for every single message coming in. not knowing where the main discussion goes, i left this mail cross-posted. regards, /k --=20 > Black holes are where GOD is dividing by zero WebMonster Community Project -- Next Generation Networks GmbH -- All on BSD http://www.webmonster.de/ -- ftp://ftp.webmonster.de/ -- http://www.ngenn.n= et/ GnuPG: 0xDEC948A6 D/E BF11 83E8 84A1 F996 68B4 A113 B393 6BF4 DEC9 48A6 REVOKED: 0x2964BF46 D/E 42F9 9FFF 50D4 2F38 DBEE DF22 3340 4F4E 2964 BF46 REVOKED: 0x4C44DA59 RSA F9 A0 DF 91 74 07 6A 1C 5F 0B E0 6B 4D CD 8C 44 My mail is GnuPG signed -- Unsigned ones are bogus -- http://www.gnupg.org/ Please do not remove my address from To: and Cc: fields in mailing lists. 1= 0x --24zk1gE8NUlDmwG9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE81lJjs5Nr9N7JSKYRAixZAJ4p453Sq94PxhVGIJoD1bxpGZh6ZgCfZCSs vwmIEYvYIp0Po7CogCDIZuw= =YcFT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --24zk1gE8NUlDmwG9-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 5: 0: 0 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from scribble.fsn.hu (scribble.fsn.hu [193.224.40.95]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EBB2E37B403 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 04:59:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 15677 invoked by uid 1000); 6 May 2002 12:04:08 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 6 May 2002 12:04:08 -0000 Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 14:04:08 +0200 (CEST) From: Attila Nagy To: BOUWSMA Beery Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nwfs + ftpd In-Reply-To: <200205041944.g44Jiki00425@beerswilling.netscum.dyndns.dk> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, > > I think this is the same issue with NULLFS and UNIONFS. (the first is > > corrected) > > See my previous mails on this topic. > You mean messages from around Mar 2001, probably? Yes, I think. > If I understand you right, this had been a problem with nullfs-mounted > filesystems, but is no longer, while it is still a unionfs-mounted-fs > problem, as I've observed. I haven't checked though... At least in -stable. > (Well, the truth is, I patched ftpd as you described (from rev 1.72 back > to 1.71) which seems to work fine, plus I rebuilt Apache while > specifying --with-sendfile=no, which also seems to work great... At > least, until the unionfs sendfile() access is fixed to work...) One of the FreeBSD developers said that this is already fixed in -current, but backporting isn't so straightforward. If you can try this out, please let me know. --------[ Free Software ISOs - ftp://ftp.fsn.hu/pub/CDROM-Images/ ]------- Attila Nagy e-mail: Attila.Nagy@fsn.hu Free Software Network (FSN.HU) phone @work: +361 210 1415 (194) cell.: +3630 306 6758 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 5:36:30 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from prioris.mini.pw.edu.pl (prioris.mini.pw.edu.pl [194.29.178.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 167A037B404 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 05:36:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost.mini.pw.edu.pl [127.0.0.1]) by prioris.mini.pw.edu.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id E25217CEDA for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 14:36:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: by prioris.mini.pw.edu.pl (Postfix, from userid 250) id 95A427CEC9; Mon, 6 May 2002 14:36:14 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 14:36:14 +0200 From: Slawek Zak To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: 2GB memory limit Message-ID: <20020506143614.A18521@prioris.mini.pw.edu.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, Will 4.6 installation be bootable on 2GB+ machines? GENERIC paniced because of swap space allocation problems in 4.4 and 4.5 I guess, so direct installation on such machines was impossible. /S To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 6:11: 3 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.liwing.de (mail.liwing.de [213.70.188.162]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAB1037B404 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 06:10:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 6544 invoked from network); 6 May 2002 13:20:19 -0000 Received: from stingray.liwing.de (HELO liwing.de) ([213.70.188.164]) (envelope-sender ) by mail.liwing.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 6 May 2002 13:20:19 -0000 Message-ID: <3CD67F4E.E7A27EEE@liwing.de> Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 15:04:14 +0200 From: Jens Rehsack Organization: LiWing IT-Services X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Karsten W. Rohrbach" Cc: Michael Riexinger , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfilter problem References: <20020504223450.GA1025@grind.grind.dom> <20020505152314.B73550@mail.webmonster.de> <20020505133204.GA667@grind.grind.dom> <20020505184630.A76286@mail.webmonster.de> <3CD5B662.26298116@liwing.de> <20020506020820.A82377@mail.webmonster.de> <3CD64534.672CD6A7@liwing.de> <20020506114555.C91849@mail.webmonster.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG "Karsten W. Rohrbach" wrote: [...] skipping indoctrination > Jens Rehsack(rehsack@liwing.de)@2002.05.06 10:56:20 +0000: > > Because of the position of the dynamic added rule there seems sometimes problems... > > huh? on ipfilter dynamic rules are always processed before the actual > rule set you supply. the definition of "dynamic rules" for ipf is > "state". see http://coombs.anu.edu.au/~avalon/ipfil-flow.html > it is a matter of _how_ you add state, please read on. I read it. As I already said: I detected some problems not make it clean. And I do not know want you want to say with this... > > block in all > > block in on isp0 all # if you just want to block incoming traffic > # from the isdn interface I like default block. So I deny all by default and allow by rule. > > pass in quick on isp0 proto tcp from any to any port = 80 keep state > > pass in quick on isp0 proto tcp from any to any port = 80 flags S/SA keep state > # we want state added when establishing a > # session, not for every tcp packet that passes > # this rule If you read your own statement above you can cut the flags, because all dynamic rules added "quick" before this rule/line, so this rule is never parsed for any already matched ... [...] > > Does the same as above, but it's really more intuitive (for me): > > block in all except to (port 80/tcp [, ...]), they are ok. > > adding tcp packet state without matching tcp flags causes that you add a > state for every subsequent packet in a session. this doesn't really make > sense. don't try your rules on a live firewall with a heavily loaded web > server behind it - your state table will fill up quite fast ;-) s.o. > > > the main problem here might be that he just had _one_ line for _both_ > > > protocols, tcp and udp, which might lead to trouble in several points. > > > that's a totally different thing. > > I have this too, and there is no problem anywhere. Of course, it could be. > > from my experiences (with firewall code different to ipfilter), it often > is a problem if you combine protocols in one rule. think about how tcp > and udp state is kept; it's a totally different story for both > protocols. Recognized. But it seems to work like C preprocessing to me. The rule with /udp/tcp is expanded to 2 rules with one protocol in one rule. > > But I got the idea of changed position of dynamic rules inserting (could > > be speed up permormance, AFAIK, depending on internal structures). > > yup, but you need quite some throughput to really notice a difference... > on an isdn router you will hardly notice a difference, it's limited to > one or some channels of 64kbit/s which is a piece of cake for nearly > every modern firewall implementation out there. > > > Reading is ok, understanding is ok (as long I can identify the letters :-)), but > > nevertheless I will not write a ruleset to late and use without checking it > > next morning. > > heh, yep... > > also, as a sidenote, ipftest(1) is your friend, regardless of the level > of intoxication ;-) I know, but a good advice in this discussion. > -- > > Microsoft isn't the answer. Microsoft is the question, and the answer is no. Every time a different saying, huh? kind regards Jens -- L i W W W i Jens Rehsack L W W W L i W W W W i nnn gggg LiWing IT-Services L i W W W W i n n g g LLLL i W W i n n g g Friesenstraße 2 gggg 06112 Halle g g g Tel.: +49 - 3 45 - 5 17 05 91 ggg e-Mail: Fax: +49 - 3 45 - 5 17 05 92 http://www.liwing.de/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 6:12:15 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39BB937B403; Mon, 6 May 2002 06:12:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (marck@localhost) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g46DC6H61711; Mon, 6 May 2002 17:12:07 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 17:12:06 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: =?KOI8-r?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= Cc: sos@freebsd.org, Subject: Re: ata(4) -STABLE subsystem and tags MFC In-Reply-To: <200205060725.g467P5HX021132@freebsd.dk> Message-ID: <20020506170949.I47498-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=KOI8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi again, On Mon, 6 May 2002, Søren Schmidt wrote: SS> > any chances patch for ata subsystem at SS> > SS> > date: 2002/04/18 19:11:45; SS> > SS> > that fixes tagged support for ata(4) will be MFC'd before 4.6-R? SS> SS> If you mean the patch that went into -current it doesn't apply to SS> the -stable branch at all, it fixed a problem introduced by the SS> busdma integration, not the problem that apparently hit some on -stable. Well then it's another problem in -stable, and currently tagged ata is not workable in all our -stable environments with IBM disks :( Machines do not crash, but constantly reinitialising ATA subsystem just at trying to boot first FS at tagged disk. What info do you need so we can try to fix this? Thanks. Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 7:53:36 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from goliath.siemens.de (goliath.siemens.de [192.35.17.28]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E5B637B403 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 07:53:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail3.siemens.de (mail3.siemens.de [139.25.208.14]) by goliath.siemens.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g46ErMR25487 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 16:53:22 +0200 (MEST) Received: from curry.mchp.siemens.de (curry.mchp.siemens.de [139.25.42.7]) by mail3.siemens.de (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g46ErLH10816 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 16:53:21 +0200 (MEST) Received: (from localhost) by curry.mchp.siemens.de (8.12.2/8.12.2) id g46ErLRl033264 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 6 May 2002 16:53:21 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 16:53:21 +0200 From: Andre Albsmeier To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: panic: ffs_vfree: freeing free inode Message-ID: <20020506165321.A98931@curry.mchp.siemens.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i X-Echelon: BND CIA NSA Mossad KGB MI6 IRA detonator nuclear assault strike X-RAVMilter-Version: 8.3.1(snapshot 20020109) (curry.mchp.siemens.de) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG One of my 4.5-STABLE servers crashed today with this msg: panic: ffs_vfree: freeing free inode I have the kernel.debug and the dump. I don't know how to debug ffs stuff but I I am happy if someone instructs me what to do. Since the filesystems are mounted with softupdates it might be a bug in the softupdates code. The kernel (and userland) where compiled Thu Mar 28 14:37:35 CET 2002. I can't remember any=20 commits to the fs code so I assume the problem is in 4.6-PRERELEASE as well. This is what I got so far: root@server:/var/crash>gdb -k /usr/obj/src/src-4/sys/server/kernel.debug vm= core.10 GNU gdb 4.18 Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain condition= s. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i386-unknown-freebsd"... IdlePTD at phsyical address 0x00303000 initial pcb at physical address 0x00282ee0 panicstr: ffs_vfree: freeing free inode panic messages: --- panic: ffs_vfree: freeing free inode syncing disks... 31 5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1=20 giving up on 1 buffers Uptime: 18d6h24m37s dumping to dev #da/9, offset 276456 dump 511 510 509 508 507 506 505 504 503 502 501 500 499 498 497 496 495 49= 4 493 492 491 490 489 488 487 486 485 484 483 482 481 480 479 478 477 476 4= 75 474 473 472 471 470 469 468 467 466 465 464 463 462 461 460 459 458 457 = 456 455 454 453 452 451 450 449 448 447 446 445 444 443 442 441 440 439 438= 437 436 435 434 433 432 431 430 429 428 427 426 425 424 423 422 421 420 41= 9 418 417 416 415 414 413 412 411 410 409 408 407 406 405 404 403 402 401 4= 00 399 398 397 396 395 394 393 392 391 390 389 388 387 386 385 384 383 382 = 381 380 379 378 377 376 375 374 373 372 371 370 369 368 367 366 365 364 363= 362 361 360 359 358 357 356 355 354 353 352 351 350 349 348 347 346 345 34= 4 343 342 341 340 339 338 337 336 335 334 333 332 331 330 329 328 327 326 3= 25 324 323 322 321 320 319 318 317 316 315 314 313 312 311 310 309 308 307 = 306 305 304 303 302 301 300 299 298 297 296 295 294 293 292 291 290 289 288= 287 286 285 284 283 282 281 280 279 278 277 276 275 274 273 272 271 270 26= 9 268 267 266 265 264 263 262 261 260 259 258 257 256 255 254 253 252 251 2= 50 249 248 247 246 245 244 243 242 241 240 239 238 237 236 235 234 233 232 = 231 230 229 228 227 226 225 224 223 222 221 220 219 218 217 216 215 214 213= 212 211 210 209 208 207 206 205 204 203 202 201 200 199 198 197 196 195 19= 4 193 192 191 190 189 188 187 186 185 184 183 182 181 180 179 178 177 176 1= 75 174 173 172 171 170 169 168 167 166 165 164 163 162 161 160 159 158 157 = 156 155 154 153 152 151 150 149 148 147 146 145 144 143 142 141 140 139 138= 137 136 135 134 133 132 131 130 129 128 127 126 125 124 123 122 121 120 11= 9 118 117 116 115 114 113 112 111 110 109 108 107 106 105 104 103 102 101 1= 00 99 98 97 96 95 94 93 92 91 90 89 88 87 86 85 84 83 82 81 80 79 78 77 76 = 75 74 73 72 71 70 69 68 67 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 = 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 = 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 [CTRL-C to = abort] [CTRL-C to abort] [CTRL-C to abort] 1 0 [CTRL-C to abort] [CTRL-C to= abort] [CTRL-C to abor --- #0 dumpsys () at /src/src-4/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:487 487 if (dumping++) { (kgdb) where #0 dumpsys () at /src/src-4/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:487 #1 0xc0161443 in boot (howto=3D256) at /src/src-4/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c= :316 #2 0xc0161868 in poweroff_wait (junk=3D0xc0255591, howto=3D0) at /src/src-4/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:595 #3 0xc01f0781 in ffs_freefile (pvp=3D0xd5321e64, ino=3D3, mode=3D17407) at /src/src-4/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_alloc.c:1611 #4 0xc01f58a4 in handle_workitem_freefile (freefile=3D0xc49793a0) at /src/src-4/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep.c:2913 #5 0xc01f2e43 in process_worklist_item (matchmnt=3D0x0, flags=3D0) at /src/src-4/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep.c:737 #6 0xc01f2cae in softdep_process_worklist (matchmnt=3D0x0) at /src/src-4/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_softdep.c:622 #7 0xc018e72f in sched_sync () at /src/src-4/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:1177 (kgdb) up 3 #3 0xc01f0781 in ffs_freefile (pvp=3D0xd5321e64, ino=3D3, mode=3D17407) at /src/src-4/sys/ufs/ffs/ffs_alloc.c:1611 1611 panic("ffs_vfree: freeing free inode"); (kgdb)=20 Now I wanted to look at fs->fs_fsmnt and found strange stuff in there. Here is the complete fs struct: (kgdb) print *fs $1 =3D {fs_firstfield =3D 1601398374, fs_unused_1 =3D 1701996150, fs_sblkno= =3D 1713388133,=20 fs_cblkno =3D 1768252786, fs_iblkno =3D 1713399662, fs_dblkno =3D 5435160= 18, fs_cgoffset =3D 1685024361,=20 fs_cgmask =3D 101, fs_time =3D 0, fs_size =3D 0, fs_dsize =3D 0, fs_ncg = =3D 1929379840,=20 fs_bsize =3D 1953653108, fs_fsize =3D 622869792, fs_frag =3D 1814047844, = fs_minfree =3D 1025535589,=20 fs_rotdelay =3D 744760608, fs_rps =3D 544433696, fs_bmask =3D 1931812925,= fs_fmask =3D 1717960714,=20 fs_bshift =3D 1818320755, fs_fshift =3D 1667460972, fs_maxcontig =3D 1830= 828647,=20 fs_maxbpg =3D 1663070305, fs_fragshift =3D 1970434671, fs_fsbtodb =3D 168= 4370544,=20 fs_sbsize =3D 1869505024, fs_csmask =3D 622869792, fs_csshift =3D 5397845= 56, fs_nindir =3D 1025536870,=20 fs_inopb =3D 175318304, fs_nspf =3D 1936090624, fs_optim =3D 1819042143, = fs_npsect =3D 1734566767,=20 fs_interleave =3D 1818370106, fs_trackskew =3D 543908719, fs_id =3D {5445= 01614, 1830841961},=20 fs_csaddr =3D 755003489, fs_cssize =3D 0, fs_cgsize =3D 0, fs_ntrak =3D 0= , fs_nsect =3D 0,=20 fs_spc =3D 1879048192, fs_ncyl =3D 622879849, fs_cpg =3D 623386724, fs_ip= g =3D 539765107,=20 fs_fpg =3D 543451509, fs_cstotal =3D {cs_ndir =3D 1864393765, cs_nbfree = =3D 1931812974,=20 cs_nifree =3D 1931812922, cs_nffree =3D 1711276042}, fs_fmod =3D 102 'f= ', fs_clean =3D 115 's',=20 fs_ronly =3D 95 '_', fs_flags =3D 98 'b',=20 fs_fsmnt =3D "alloc: blk too big\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000Could= not unwind indirect block, error %d", '\000' , "ffs_upda= te: bad link cnt\000\000\000\000\000\000\000\000ffs_truncate: read-only fil= esystem\000ffs_truncate: newspace\000\000\000\000\000\000\000ffs_indirtrunc= : bad buffer"..., fs_cgrotor =3D 1952870259, fs_ocsp =3D {0x5f706564, 0x6b6= 36f6c, 0x6f6c203a,=20 0x68206b63, 0x20646c65, 0x25207962, 0x6f730064, 0x65647466, 0x6e755f70,= 0x6b636f6c,=20 0x6f6c203a, 0x6e206b63, 0x6820746f, 0x646c65, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, 0x0, = 0x0, 0x0, 0x69000000,=20 0x7265746e, 0x6b636f6c, 0x735f6465, 0x7065656c, 0x6f6c203a, 0x6e206b63,= 0x6820746f},=20 fs_contigdirs =3D 0x646c65
, fs_csp =3D 0= x0, fs_maxcluster =3D 0x0,=20 fs_cpc =3D 0, fs_opostbl =3D {{0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, {0, 26880, 29806,= 29285, 28524, 27491,=20 25701, 29535}, {25964, 28773, 8250, 28277, 28267, 30575, 8302, 28783}= , {29285, 29793, 28521,=20 110, 0, 0, 0, 0}, {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, {0, 26880, 29806, 29285, = 28524, 27491, 25701,=20 29535}, {25964, 28773, 8250, 28524, 27491, 28265, 8295, 26465}, {2697= 7, 29550, 8308, 25971,=20 26220, 0, 0, 0}, {0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, {0, 26880, 29806, 29285, 2= 8524, 27491, 25701,=20 29535}, {25964, 28773, 8250, 28524, 27491, 26656, 27749, 8292}, {3107= 4, 9504, 100, 25971,=20 24941, 29279, 27749, 24933}, {25971, 8250, 28526, 8308, 25960, 25708,= 0, 0}, {0, 30464,=20 29295, 27755, 29545, 24436, 28265, 25971}, {29810, 8250, 28524, 27491= , 28192, 29807, 26656,=20 27749}, {100, 30464, 29295, 27755, 29545, 24436, 28265, 25971}}, fs_s= napinum =3D {540701810,=20 1701997665, 544826465, 1814064751, 7631721, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 199648= 8704, 1818980975,=20 1601467241, 1869440370, 540697974, 1801678700, 1953459744, 1818585120},= =20 fs_avgfilesize =3D 1870069860, fs_avgfpdir =3D 1768713074, fs_sparecon = =3D {1918858355, 1987013989,=20 1847605861, 1864397935, 1768693870, 1996518515, 1768649327, 1601004916,= 1701147238,=20 1953701946, 543976553, 1814064751, 7631721, 1802661751, 1835365481, 170= 1996127, 1948269157,=20 543518841, 1836280173, 1751348321, 1828735232, 1935636577, 1685349999, = 7565413, -2147483648,=20 1958750074}, fs_pendingblocks =3D 1684759401, fs_pendinginodes =3D 2036= 427877,=20 fs_contigsumsize =3D -1073741824, fs_maxsymlinklen =3D 2009081722, fs_ino= defmt =3D 1818980975,=20 fs_maxfilesize =3D 7526488527764484969, fs_qbmask =3D 7115730820479844352= ,=20 fs_qfmask =3D 8388356080511445868, fs_state =3D 1937076319, fs_postblform= at =3D 1073741928,=20 fs_nrpos =3D 1774200699, fs_postbloff =3D 1818193774, fs_rotbloff =3D 195= 3066345,=20 fs_magic =3D 1937076319, fs_space =3D "h"} I think fs_fsmnt is somehow not correct. Please notice the data of fs_contigdirs as well. If somebody think it makes sense, I can file a PR and keep kernel and dump for debugging. Thanks, -Andre To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 8: 1:55 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freebsd.dk (fw-rl0.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.114]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAFAF37B404; Mon, 6 May 2002 08:01:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from sos@localhost) by freebsd.dk (8.12.2/8.12.2) id g46F1osl004997; Mon, 6 May 2002 17:01:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sos) From: Søren Schmidt Message-Id: <200205061501.g46F1osl004997@freebsd.dk> Subject: Re: ata(4) -STABLE subsystem and tags MFC In-Reply-To: <20020506170949.I47498-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> To: Dmitry Morozovsky Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 17:01:49 +0200 (CEST) Cc: sos@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org Reply-To: sos@freebsd.dk X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL94b (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG It seems Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > SS> If you mean the patch that went into -current it doesn't apply to > SS> the -stable branch at all, it fixed a problem introduced by the > SS> busdma integration, not the problem that apparently hit some on -stable. > > Well then it's another problem in -stable, and currently tagged ata is not > workable in all our -stable environments with IBM disks :( Machines do not > crash, but constantly reinitialising ATA subsystem just at trying to boot > first FS at tagged disk. > > What info do you need so we can try to fix this? I need to be able to reproduce it here in my lab, and so far I havn't had any luck with that. There also doesn't seem to be any easy to find denominator between the systems that fail... The problem is probably timing related, perhaps I have gotten something a wee bit out of spec, but not enough for all systems to fail... Anyhow this is a bitch to debug.... -Søren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 8: 6:13 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 327A337B401; Mon, 6 May 2002 08:06:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (marck@localhost) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g46F64j64117; Mon, 6 May 2002 19:06:04 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 19:06:04 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: =?KOI8-r?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= Cc: sos@freebsd.org, Subject: Re: ata(4) -STABLE subsystem and tags MFC In-Reply-To: <200205061501.g46F1osl004997@freebsd.dk> Message-ID: <20020506190313.N47498-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=KOI8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 6 May 2002, Søren Schmidt wrote: SS> > Well then it's another problem in -stable, and currently tagged ata is not SS> > workable in all our -stable environments with IBM disks :( Machines do not SS> > crash, but constantly reinitialising ATA subsystem just at trying to boot SS> > first FS at tagged disk. SS> > SS> > What info do you need so we can try to fix this? SS> SS> I need to be able to reproduce it here in my lab, and so far I havn't SS> had any luck with that. There also doesn't seem to be any easy to find SS> denominator between the systems that fail... SS> SS> The problem is probably timing related, perhaps I have gotten something SS> a wee bit out of spec, but not enough for all systems to fail... SS> SS> Anyhow this is a bitch to debug.... Yeah, I see. By the way, I have a test machine handy, and also space GXP disc, so I'm going to build testcase. It's K6/2-450 at TX motherboard. What info do I need to send? (possibly, we should move the discussion of the precise details to private mail, yeah?) Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 8:29:10 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.webmonster.de (datasink.webmonster.de [194.162.162.209]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 44B5F37B48E for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 08:28:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 97670 invoked by uid 1000); 6 May 2002 15:28:57 -0000 Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 17:28:57 +0200 From: "Karsten W. Rohrbach" To: Jens Rehsack Cc: Michael Riexinger , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfilter problem Message-ID: <20020506172856.A97107@mail.webmonster.de> References: <20020504223450.GA1025@grind.grind.dom> <20020505152314.B73550@mail.webmonster.de> <20020505133204.GA667@grind.grind.dom> <20020505184630.A76286@mail.webmonster.de> <3CD5B662.26298116@liwing.de> <20020506020820.A82377@mail.webmonster.de> <3CD64534.672CD6A7@liwing.de> <20020506114555.C91849@mail.webmonster.de> <3CD67F4E.E7A27EEE@liwing.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9amGYk9869ThD9tj" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <3CD67F4E.E7A27EEE@liwing.de>; from rehsack@liwing.de on Mon, May 06, 2002 at 03:04:14PM +0200 X-Arbitrary-Number-Of-The-Day: 42 X-URL: http://www.webmonster.de/ X-Disclaimer: My opinions do not necessarily represent those of my employer X-Work-URL: http://www.ngenn.net/ X-Work-Address: nGENn GmbH, Schloss Kransberg, D-61250 Usingen-Kransberg, Germany X-Work-Phone: +49-6081-682-304 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --9amGYk9869ThD9tj Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Jens Rehsack(rehsack@liwing.de)@2002.05.06 15:04:14 +0000: > "Karsten W. Rohrbach" wrote: > > pass in quick on isp0 proto tcp from any to any port =3D 80 flags S/SA = keep state > > # we want state added when establishing a > > # session, not for every tcp packet that passes > > # this rule > If you read your own statement above you can cut the flags, because all d= ynamic > rules added "quick" before this rule/line, so this rule is never parsed f= or > any already matched ... valid point, my reasoning was wrong (worse: it hurts so bad, that i wonder why nobody else intervened ;-) the reasoning about "why flags S/SA" boils down to the point that no out-of-session packet should be allowed to create a state. session establishment is restricted to SYN/SYN+ACK packets, nothing more. IIRC, the state will just hang there until it times out, but it will be there and use a slot in the state table; ipfilter will not pass a matching packet because of the incomplete session state which is tracked in the=20 state table, anyway. regards, /k --=20 > Experience is a teacher that gives the examination first and the > lesson afterwards.=20 WebMonster Community Project -- Next Generation Networks GmbH -- All on BSD http://www.webmonster.de/ -- ftp://ftp.webmonster.de/ -- http://www.ngenn.n= et/ GnuPG: 0xDEC948A6 D/E BF11 83E8 84A1 F996 68B4 A113 B393 6BF4 DEC9 48A6 REVOKED: 0x2964BF46 D/E 42F9 9FFF 50D4 2F38 DBEE DF22 3340 4F4E 2964 BF46 REVOKED: 0x4C44DA59 RSA F9 A0 DF 91 74 07 6A 1C 5F 0B E0 6B 4D CD 8C 44 My mail is GnuPG signed -- Unsigned ones are bogus -- http://www.gnupg.org/ Please do not remove my address from To: and Cc: fields in mailing lists. 1= 0x --9amGYk9869ThD9tj Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE81qE4s5Nr9N7JSKYRAp3XAKCP+z+NLaeEg0lB/riefRF/OnmFiwCfSrIm vztE3NQHuATlOXOxUWGP3dw= =wDzh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9amGYk9869ThD9tj-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 9:26:30 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ridge.aps.org (ridge.aps.org [149.28.1.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F45C37B400 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 09:26:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pcpaul.aps.org (lugnut.aps.org [149.28.3.182]) by ridge.aps.org (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA15650 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 12:26:23 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lugnut.aps.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pcpaul.aps.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D6907E for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 12:26:23 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" From: Paul Dlug To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: fxp0: SCB timeout Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 12:26:22 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200205061226.22775.paul@nerdlabs.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm seeing these messages scroll past on the console quite rapidly: fxp0: device timeout fxp0: DMA timeout fxp0: DMA timeout fxp0: SCB timeout: 0x10 0x0 0x80 0x0 I searched the mailing list archive and came up with some people having the same problem, but no definitive answers. The hardware is a Dell 1550 with dual onboard Intel NIC's, running 4.5-STABLE (cvsup'd as of two weeks ago). There are four other identical servers on the same switch that are not having this problem, this occurs only on this one host. After are reboot the box is fine for an hour or so before it starts to die again. Any suggestions? Thanks, Paul To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 9:59:28 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ns1.infowest.com (ns1.infowest.com [204.17.177.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3792B37B400 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 09:59:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from kgifford (www.fmei.com [65.100.240.153]) by ns1.infowest.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 842FA2190E; Mon, 6 May 2002 10:59:21 -0600 (MDT) Reply-To: From: "Kendall Gifford" To: "'Paul Dlug'" Cc: , Subject: RE: fxp0: SCB timeout Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 10:59:21 -0600 Organization: Jedi's Domain Message-ID: <000a01c1f51f$5ea50970$2501a8c0@fmepro.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627 In-Reply-To: <200205061226.22775.paul@nerdlabs.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I also have a Dell PowerEdge 1550 with 4.5-STABLE and had the same SCB timeout problem with the fxp driver. I never found much definitive info, but I did hear one suggestion that this was somehow related to advanced power management. I rebuilt a kernel without APM by removing the line: device apm0 at nexus?... I have not had any problems with this since then, but I would only have the problem in periodic storms anyway. Thus there is no way for me to be sure if it is just coincidence that I haven't experience the problem since then. I would appreciate it if anyone else could/would shed some more light on this issue. It seems those of us with ServerWorks chipset motherboards and versions of Intel Pro cards w/ the fxp driver have this issue. Dmesg below: [...snip...] pcib0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 fxp0: port 0xecc0-0xecff mem 0xfe100000-0xfe1f ffff,0xfe2ff000-0xfe2fffff irq 11 at device 1.0 on pci0 [...snip...] > On Monday, May 06, 2002, Paul Dlug wrote: > I'm seeing these messages scroll past on the console quite rapidly: > > fxp0: device timeout > fxp0: DMA timeout > fxp0: DMA timeout > fxp0: SCB timeout: 0x10 0x0 0x80 0x0 > > I searched the mailing list archive and came up with some > people having the > same problem, but no definitive answers. The hardware is a > Dell 1550 with > dual onboard Intel NIC's, running 4.5-STABLE (cvsup'd as of > two weeks ago). > There are four other identical servers on the same switch > that are not having > this problem, this occurs only on this one host. After are > reboot the box is > fine for an hour or so before it starts to die again. > > Any suggestions? > > Thanks, > Paul ____________ Kendall Gifford http://kendall.jedis.com kendall@jedis.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 10: 3:49 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (castle.jp.FreeBSD.org [210.226.20.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E76E37B401 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 10:03:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [::1]) by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.3) with ESMTP/inet6 id g46H3hf33960 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 02:03:44 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org) In-Reply-To: <20020506130953S.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> References: <200205052131.g45LVYx60743@drugs.dv.isc.org> <20020506130953S.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> X-User-Agent: Mew/1.94.2 XEmacs/21.5 (bamboo) X-FaceAnim: (-O_O-)(O_O- )(_O- )(O- )(- -)( -O)( -O_)( -O_O)(-O_O-) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 11 From: Makoto Matsushita To: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: BIND in -stable Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 02:03:39 +0900 Message-Id: <20020507020339N.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG matusita> Anybody knows when 8.3.2 is out? I've contacted ISC directly, and found that 8.3.2 will be released real soon (yes, real soon). If it doesn't released before May/11/2002, they'll release 8.3.1p1 for bugfix-release of 8.3.1. Any committers import new BIND code when released? -- - Makoto `MAR' Matsushita To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 10:44:28 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pendragon.tacni.net (radius.tacni.net [64.247.218.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 486A537B423 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 10:43:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 48354 invoked by uid 85); 6 May 2002 17:43:40 -0000 Received: from erichz@superhero.org by pendragon.tacni.net by uid 81 with qmail-scanner-1.11 (uvscan: v4.1.60/v4200. . Clear:. Processed in 0.60569 secs); 06 May 2002 17:43:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO cerebro.superhero.org) (66.190.75.236) by arthur.tacni.net with SMTP; 6 May 2002 17:43:39 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" From: Erich Zigler To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Unable to alias IP's in 4.5 Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 12:43:38 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200205061243.38680.erichz@superhero.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG It seems from FreeBSD version 4.5 on I am unable to alias IP addresses to= a=20 NIC card if the IP I am trying to alias has the same netmask as the=20 previously bound IP.=20 I get nothing but a file exists error from ifconfig. I have been doing this since 3.4 so Im wondering what has changed. --=20 The fact that no one understands you doesn't mean you're an artist.=20 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 11: 3:44 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ridge.aps.org (ridge.aps.org [149.28.1.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B628D37B404 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 11:03:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pcpaul.aps.org (lugnut.aps.org [149.28.3.182]) by ridge.aps.org (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA18081; Mon, 6 May 2002 14:03:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lugnut.aps.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pcpaul.aps.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E22A7E; Mon, 6 May 2002 14:03:34 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Paul Dlug To: kendall@jedis.com Subject: Re: fxp0: SCB timeout Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 14:03:34 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4] Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, kendall@jedis.com References: <000a01c1f51f$5ea50970$2501a8c0@fmepro.com> In-Reply-To: <000a01c1f51f$5ea50970$2501a8c0@fmepro.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200205061403.34537.paul@nerdlabs.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I have apm disabled in the kernel already. I have the same ServerWorks chipset you mentioned. On Monday 06 May 2002 12:59 pm, Kendall Gifford wrote: > I also have a Dell PowerEdge 1550 with 4.5-STABLE and had the same > SCB timeout problem with the fxp driver. I never found much definitive > info, > but I did hear one suggestion that this was somehow related to advanced > power management. I rebuilt a kernel without APM by removing the line: > > device apm0 at nexus?... > > I have not had any problems with this since then, but I would only have > the problem in periodic storms anyway. Thus there is no way for me to > be sure if it is just coincidence that I haven't experience the problem > since then. I would appreciate it if anyone else could/would shed some > more light on this issue. It seems those of us with ServerWorks chipset > motherboards and versions of Intel Pro cards w/ the fxp driver have > this issue. Dmesg below: > > [...snip...] > pcib0: on motherboard > pci0: on pcib0 > fxp0: port 0xecc0-0xecff mem > 0xfe100000-0xfe1f > ffff,0xfe2ff000-0xfe2fffff irq 11 at device 1.0 on pci0 > [...snip...] > > > On Monday, May 06, 2002, Paul Dlug wrote: > > I'm seeing these messages scroll past on the console quite rapidly: > > > > fxp0: device timeout > > fxp0: DMA timeout > > fxp0: DMA timeout > > fxp0: SCB timeout: 0x10 0x0 0x80 0x0 > > > > I searched the mailing list archive and came up with some > > people having the > > same problem, but no definitive answers. The hardware is a > > Dell 1550 with > > dual onboard Intel NIC's, running 4.5-STABLE (cvsup'd as of > > two weeks ago). > > There are four other identical servers on the same switch > > that are not having > > this problem, this occurs only on this one host. After are > > reboot the box is > > fine for an hour or so before it starts to die again. > > > > Any suggestions? > > > > Thanks, > > Paul > > ____________ > Kendall Gifford > http://kendall.jedis.com > kendall@jedis.com > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 11: 5:26 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mikea.ath.cx (ip68-97-1-197.ok.ok.cox.net [68.97.1.197]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DADBD37B403 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 11:05:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mikea.ath.cx (bsd [192.168.1.1]) by mikea.ath.cx (8.12.3/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g46I5Dx3011128; Mon, 6 May 2002 13:05:20 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from mikea@mikea.ath.cx) Received: (from mikea@localhost) by mikea.ath.cx (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g46I5DuV011127; Mon, 6 May 2002 13:05:13 -0500 (CDT) Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 13:05:13 -0500 From: mikea To: Erich Zigler Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Unable to alias IP's in 4.5 Message-ID: <20020506130513.A11098@mikea.ath.cx> Mail-Followup-To: mikea , Erich Zigler , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200205061243.38680.erichz@superhero.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <200205061243.38680.erichz@superhero.org>; from erichz@superhero.org on Mon, May 06, 2002 at 12:43:38PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 12:43:38PM -0500, Erich Zigler wrote: > It seems from FreeBSD version 4.5 on I am unable to alias IP addresses to a > NIC card if the IP I am trying to alias has the same netmask as the > previously bound IP. > > I get nothing but a file exists error from ifconfig. > > I have been doing this since 3.4 so Im wondering what has changed. Possibly the change is in the code that should have been keeping you from doing that all along. That's certainly the case if the alias IP is in the same network as the original, non-alias IP. -- Mike Andrews mikea@mikea.ath.cx Tired old sysadmin since 1964 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 11:25:19 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from snoop.burghcom.com (burgcom.cust.stargate.net [209.166.166.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0EB4037B40C for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 11:23:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 45453 invoked from network); 6 May 2002 18:23:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO 1185) (209.114.160.245) by snoop.burghcom.com with SMTP; 6 May 2002 18:23:48 -0000 Message-ID: <000d01c1f52b$2ba4bd20$f5a072d1@hq.sgi.net> From: "Jeff Love" To: References: <200205061243.38680.erichz@superhero.org> Subject: Re: Unable to alias IP's in 4.5 Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 14:23:49 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I am running 4.5-STABLE and am able to alias IP's with the same netmask. /sbin/ifconfig xl0 alias 209.166.167.200 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 209.166.167.255 /sbin/ifconfig xl0 alias 209.166.167.201 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 209.166.167.255 /sbin/ifconfig xl0 alias 209.166.167.202 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 209.166.167.255 /sbin/ifconfig xl0 alias 209.166.167.203 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 209.166.167.255 /sbin/ifconfig xl0 alias 209.166.167.204 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 209.166.167.255 /sbin/ifconfig xl0 alias 209.166.167.205 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 209.166.167.255 /sbin/ifconfig xl0 alias 209.166.167.206 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 209.166.167.255 /sbin/ifconfig xl0 alias 209.166.167.207 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 209.166.167.255 xl0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 options=3 inet 209.166.166.21 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 209.166.166.255 inet6 fe80::201:2ff:fe35:c977%xl0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x1 inet 209.166.167.200 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 209.166.167.255 inet 209.166.167.201 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 209.166.167.255 inet 209.166.167.202 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 209.166.167.255 inet 209.166.167.203 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 209.166.167.255 inet 209.166.167.204 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 209.166.167.255 inet 209.166.167.205 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 209.166.167.255 inet 209.166.167.206 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 209.166.167.255 inet 209.166.167.207 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 209.166.167.255 ether 00:01:02:35:c9:77 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX) status: active Jeff Love Burgh-Com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Erich Zigler" To: Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 1:43 PM Subject: Unable to alias IP's in 4.5 It seems from FreeBSD version 4.5 on I am unable to alias IP addresses to a NIC card if the IP I am trying to alias has the same netmask as the previously bound IP. I get nothing but a file exists error from ifconfig. I have been doing this since 3.4 so Im wondering what has changed. -- The fact that no one understands you doesn't mean you're an artist. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 11:28: 9 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from alicia.nttmcl.com (alicia.nttmcl.com [216.69.69.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BC5A37B403; Mon, 6 May 2002 11:27:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from jj@localhost) by alicia.nttmcl.com (8.10.1/8.10.1) id g46IQiv18127; Mon, 6 May 2002 11:26:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 11:26:44 -0700 From: JJ Behrens To: Terry Lambert , Dave Hayes , Brooks Davis , Michael Sierchio , Drew Tomlinson , bmah@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: organic documentation Message-ID: <20020506112644.A17574@alicia.nttmcl.com> Mail-Followup-To: JJ Behrens , Terry Lambert , Dave Hayes , Brooks Davis , Michael Sierchio , Drew Tomlinson , bmah@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20020503142917.H32803-100000@twirl.bitdance.com> <3CD3273B.1D8F54F4@mindspring.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2i In-Reply-To: <3CD3273B.1D8F54F4@mindspring.com>; from tlambert2@mindspring.com on Fri, May 03, 2002 at 05:11:39PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Well, I humbly submit that we should kill this thread :) The original poster's question was easily solved by reading the handbook. Furthermore, we have come to no concensus on improvements to the handbook (e.g. wiki, etc.). Hence, I propose we backburner this topic until a situation arises where something like wiki turns out to be more helpful than just the handbook alone. My $0.02 :) -jj > "R. David Murray" wrote: > > Sorry for dropping in to the middle of a conversation, but this > > comment puzzles me. I fail to see how: > > > > handbook + per-page comments from readers > > > > is *inferior* to: > > > > handbook with no comments > > > > given that the handbook maintainers do not have infinate time > > to polish the handbook, nor infinate knowledge about the > > quirks discoverd by the community. > > 1) Qualification of sources of information. Not every > commenting reader is adding something other than > "First Post! Nyah!". > > 2) Classification varies by individual; to present a > coherent whole, not everyone can be an editor. This > is why published collections of works have editors: > to apply a uniform standard. > > 3) Disinformatoin is not discernable from information. > > Consider a dictionary created via a wiki: > > o Some people could order their entries by length, while > others could order them alphabetically; > > o Is the Schlossen before or after the character "S", > lexically? > > o Who checks the facts? > > o Copyright assignmnet (I guess you could "shrink wrap" > this). > > > > Good comments could be properly classified and incorporated into > > the text as the maintainers have time. > > So you need an editor. I guess you are suggesting that they > would be incorporated into the handbook itself? > > > > On the other hand, I *can* see that it might be a non-trivial > > project to integrate the documentation system with a web > > comment system such that the two do not interfere with each other. > > A web comment system will interfere. It can't help it. -- Users of C++ should consider hanging themselves rather than shooting their legs off--it's best not to use C++ simply as a better C. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 12:34:44 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from vimfuego.saarinen.org (saarinen.org [203.79.82.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E11F37B422 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 12:34:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (helo=den2) by vimfuego.saarinen.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Red Hack)) id 174oFI-0005Rx-00; Tue, 07 May 2002 07:34:04 +1200 Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 07:33:08 +1200 (New Zealand Standard Time) From: Juha Saarinen To: Makoto Matsushita Cc: "stable@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: BIND in -stable In-Reply-To: <20020507020339N.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: X-Message-Flag: " " X-X-Sender: juha@vimfuego.saarinen.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 7 May 2002, Makoto Matsushita wrote: > I've contacted ISC directly, and found that 8.3.2 will be released real > soon (yes, real soon). If it doesn't released before May/11/2002, > they'll release 8.3.1p1 for bugfix-release of 8.3.1. Just out of curiosity, why is version 8.x so desirable, and not 9.x? Why isn't 9.x in the base -STABLE? -- Juha Saarinen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 12:41:26 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from exodus.ait.co.za (exodus.ait.co.za [66.8.26.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B757337B405 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 12:41:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aragon [66.8.86.210] by exodus.ait.co.za (SMTPD32-4.06) id AAF05C7A010C; Mon, 06 May 2002 21:41:20 0200 Message-ID: <00dd01c1f535$f07e37c0$01000001@aragon> From: "Aragon Gouveia" To: Subject: top, vmstat on 4.6-PRE Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 21:40:55 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I recently upgraded to 4.6-PRE. Since then top and vmstat have ceased to function. Top outputs this: top: nlist failed vmstat this: vmstat: undefined symbols: _kmemstatistics _bucket _zlist I've tried running the binaries from the build in /usr/obj as well, but they do the same. Can anyone help me? Thanks, Aragon [ Accomplishing the impossible only means your boss will add it to your regular duties. ] To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 12:44: 5 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from exodus.ait.co.za (exodus.ait.co.za [66.8.26.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 460CE37B403 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 12:43:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aragon [66.8.86.210] by exodus.ait.co.za (SMTPD32-4.06) id AB885C7C010C; Mon, 06 May 2002 21:43:52 0200 Message-ID: <00e501c1f536$4b067cc0$01000001@aragon> From: "Aragon Gouveia" To: References: <00dd01c1f535$f07e37c0$01000001@aragon> Subject: Re: top, vmstat on 4.6-PRE Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 21:43:27 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Systat also fails with this error: systat: nlist: can't find following symbols: _ccpu _fscale Thanks, Aragon ----- Original Message ----- From: "Aragon Gouveia" To: Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 9:40 PM Subject: top, vmstat on 4.6-PRE > Hi, > > I recently upgraded to 4.6-PRE. Since then top and vmstat have ceased to > function. Top outputs this: > > top: nlist failed > > vmstat this: > > vmstat: undefined symbols: > _kmemstatistics _bucket _zlist > > I've tried running the binaries from the build in /usr/obj as well, but they > do the same. Can anyone help me? > > > Thanks, > Aragon > > > [ Accomplishing the impossible only means your boss will add it to your > regular duties. ] > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 12:45:33 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFFF637B401 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 12:45:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (marck@localhost) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g46JitI04176; Mon, 6 May 2002 23:44:55 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 23:44:55 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Aragon Gouveia Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: top, vmstat on 4.6-PRE In-Reply-To: <00dd01c1f535$f07e37c0$01000001@aragon> Message-ID: <20020506234415.W47498-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 6 May 2002, Aragon Gouveia wrote: AG> I recently upgraded to 4.6-PRE. Since then top and vmstat have ceased to AG> function. Top outputs this: AG> AG> top: nlist failed AG> AG> vmstat this: AG> AG> vmstat: undefined symbols: AG> _kmemstatistics _bucket _zlist AG> AG> I've tried running the binaries from the build in /usr/obj as well, but they AG> do the same. Can anyone help me? Based on the last sentense, I'd vote that you're running new userland with old kernel. Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 12:50:49 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from exodus.ait.co.za (exodus.ait.co.za [66.8.26.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A784F37B404 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 12:50:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aragon [66.8.86.210] by exodus.ait.co.za (SMTPD32-4.06) id AD295C83010C; Mon, 06 May 2002 21:50:49 0200 Message-ID: <00ff01c1f537$44032df0$01000001@aragon> From: "Aragon Gouveia" To: References: <20020506234415.W47498-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> Subject: Re: top, vmstat on 4.6-PRE Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 21:50:24 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, > Based on the last sentense, I'd vote that you're running new userland with > old kernel. Not so: server2:~# top top: nlist failed server2:~# uname -rs FreeBSD 4.6-PRERELEASE Thanks, Aragon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 12:55: 7 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from lerlaptop.iadfw.net (lerlaptop.iadfw.net [206.66.13.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C65037B440 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 12:54:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lerlaptop.iadfw.net (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g46Jrjaw005878; Mon, 6 May 2002 14:54:04 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from ler@lerctr.org) Subject: Re: top, vmstat on 4.6-PRE From: Larry Rosenman To: Aragon Gouveia Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <00ff01c1f537$44032df0$01000001@aragon> References: <20020506234415.W47498-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> <00ff01c1f537$44032df0$01000001@aragon> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 Date: 06 May 2002 14:53:45 -0500 Message-Id: <1020714844.46315.25.camel@lerlaptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 2002-05-06 at 14:50, Aragon Gouveia wrote: > Hi, > > > Based on the last sentense, I'd vote that you're running new userland with > > old kernel. > > Not so: > > server2:~# top > top: nlist failed > server2:~# uname -rs > FreeBSD 4.6-PRERELEASE I hate to say this, but "It works here" on a system CVSup'd yesterday and world re-done. Sorry. > > > Thanks, > Aragon > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 12:57:40 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.datapipe.com (mail.datapipe.com [64.27.120.46]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA71337B404 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 12:57:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tool [64.27.64.34] by mail.datapipe.com with ESMTP (SMTPD32-6.06) id A02116B50036; Mon, 06 May 2002 15:57:21 -0400 Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 15:57:21 -0400 (EDT) From: Matt Ayres X-X-Sender: matta@tool.teb2.datapipe.net To: Aragon Gouveia Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: top, vmstat on 4.6-PRE In-Reply-To: <00ff01c1f537$44032df0$01000001@aragon> Message-ID: <20020506155644.B18752-100000@tool.teb2.datapipe.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Make sure nothing is failing during the boot process. If /boot/loader is not used you will get this error. On Mon, 6 May 2002, Aragon Gouveia wrote: > Hi, > > > Based on the last sentense, I'd vote that you're running new userland with > > old kernel. > > Not so: > > server2:~# top > top: nlist failed > server2:~# uname -rs > FreeBSD 4.6-PRERELEASE > > > Thanks, > Aragon > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 13: 0: 9 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F83837B400 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 13:00:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (marck@localhost) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g46Jxmg06822; Mon, 6 May 2002 23:59:48 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 23:59:48 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Aragon Gouveia Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: top, vmstat on 4.6-PRE In-Reply-To: <00ff01c1f537$44032df0$01000001@aragon> Message-ID: <20020506235844.D47498-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 6 May 2002, Aragon Gouveia wrote: AG> > Based on the last sentense, I'd vote that you're running new userland with AG> > old kernel. AG> AG> Not so: AG> AG> server2:~# top AG> top: nlist failed AG> server2:~# uname -rs AG> FreeBSD 4.6-PRERELEASE Hmm. Something definitely is out of sync at your place, 'cause I just rebooted my test machine, freshly CVSed and world-rebuilt. top and assotiates work flawlessly. Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 13:25:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from exodus.ait.co.za (exodus.ait.co.za [66.8.26.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 514F737B405 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 13:25:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aragon [66.8.86.210] by exodus.ait.co.za (SMTPD32-4.06) id A5325C8D010C; Mon, 06 May 2002 22:25:06 0200 Message-ID: <015301c1f53c$0dac19b0$01000001@aragon> From: "Aragon Gouveia" To: References: <20020506155644.B18752-100000@tool.teb2.datapipe.net> Subject: Re: top, vmstat on 4.6-PRE Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 22:24:41 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, > Make sure nothing is failing during the boot process. If /boot/loader is > not used you will get this error. I didn't install the machine myself, but I think it is using /boot/loader. How can I check? Unfortunately I don't have console access to the machine and can't check for any bootup error messages before the kernel load. Thanks, Aragon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 13:32:25 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from exodus.ait.co.za (exodus.ait.co.za [66.8.26.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE0A837B401 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 13:31:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aragon [66.8.86.210] by exodus.ait.co.za (SMTPD32-4.06) id A6D65C90010C; Mon, 06 May 2002 22:32:06 0200 Message-ID: <017701c1f53d$07e828b0$01000001@aragon> From: "Aragon Gouveia" To: References: <20020506235844.D47498-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> Subject: Re: top, vmstat on 4.6-PRE Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 22:31:40 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, > Hmm. Something definitely is out of sync at your place, 'cause I just > rebooted my test machine, freshly CVSed and world-rebuilt. top and > assotiates work flawlessly. I think it's something else. I just tried to copy the vmstat binary from this machine to a 4.4-STABLE machine and it works fine there. And copying the vmstat binary from the 4.4-STABLE machine to 4.6-PRE still fails. Thanks, Aragon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 13:33: 3 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-43.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.43]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1245237B40B for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 13:32:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A858566DC8; Mon, 6 May 2002 13:32:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 13:32:17 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Aragon Gouveia Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: top, vmstat on 4.6-PRE Message-ID: <20020506133217.E59402@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <00dd01c1f535$f07e37c0$01000001@aragon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="d8Lz2Tf5e5STOWUP" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <00dd01c1f535$f07e37c0$01000001@aragon>; from aragon@phat.za.net on Mon, May 06, 2002 at 09:40:55PM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --d8Lz2Tf5e5STOWUP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 09:40:55PM +0200, Aragon Gouveia wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I recently upgraded to 4.6-PRE. Since then top and vmstat have ceased to > function. Top outputs this: >=20 > top: nlist failed FAQ. Kris --d8Lz2Tf5e5STOWUP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE81uhRWry0BWjoQKURAj1AAJ48RkSRwg1PklOJQFf8WI1SXf8S2gCdEtII dT5ALPjQ5hAC/0Q29gEceSE= =7xKQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --d8Lz2Tf5e5STOWUP-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 14: 1:15 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from exodus.ait.co.za (exodus.ait.co.za [66.8.26.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5012137B400 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 14:01:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aragon [66.8.86.210] by exodus.ait.co.za (SMTPD32-4.06) id ADA81730136; Mon, 06 May 2002 23:01:12 0200 Message-ID: <01ac01c1f541$187c1930$01000001@aragon> From: "Aragon Gouveia" To: References: <20020506155644.B18752-100000@tool.teb2.datapipe.net> <015301c1f53c$0dac19b0$01000001@aragon> Subject: Re: top, vmstat on 4.6-PRE Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 23:00:46 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4522.1200 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4522.1200 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I did a remote reboot and both are working now. I guess someone at the ISP felt a strange need to skip /boot/loader during the last bootup *sigh*. Thanks, Aragon ----- Original Message ----- From: "Aragon Gouveia" To: Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 10:24 PM Subject: Re: top, vmstat on 4.6-PRE > Hi, > > > Make sure nothing is failing during the boot process. If /boot/loader is > > not used you will get this error. > > I didn't install the machine myself, but I think it is using /boot/loader. > How can I check? > > Unfortunately I don't have console access to the machine and can't check for > any bootup error messages before the kernel load. > > > Thanks, > Aragon > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 14:11:15 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mrout2.yahoo.com (mrout2.yahoo.com [216.145.54.172]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 454C237B42A for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 14:11:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zoot.corp.yahoo.com (zoot.corp.yahoo.com [216.145.52.89]) by mrout2.yahoo.com (8.11.6/8.11.6/y.out) with ESMTP id g46LAaE05140; Mon, 6 May 2002 14:10:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dougb@localhost) by zoot.corp.yahoo.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) with ESMTP id g46LAVQF013058; Mon, 6 May 2002 14:10:36 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 14:10:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton To: Erich Zigler Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Unable to alias IP's in 4.5 In-Reply-To: <200205061243.38680.erichz@superhero.org> Message-ID: <20020506140949.O13051-100000@zoot.corp.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 6 May 2002, Erich Zigler wrote: > It seems from FreeBSD version 4.5 on I am unable to alias IP addresses to a > NIC card if the IP I am trying to alias has the same netmask as the > previously bound IP. All aliases should have the netmask of 255.255.255.255, regardless of what the netmask of the base IP is. -- "We have known freedom's price. We have shown freedom's power. And in this great conflict, ... we will see freedom's victory." - George W. Bush, President of the United States State of the Union, January 28, 2002 Do YOU Yahoo!? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 14:12:48 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mrout1.yahoo.com (mrout1.yahoo.com [216.145.54.171]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8C9337B407 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 14:12:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zoot.corp.yahoo.com (zoot.corp.yahoo.com [216.145.52.89]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.11.6/8.11.6/y.out) with ESMTP id g46LCTA51428; Mon, 6 May 2002 14:12:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dougb@localhost) by zoot.corp.yahoo.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) with ESMTP id g46LCTOS013061; Mon, 6 May 2002 14:12:29 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 14:12:29 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton To: Makoto Matsushita Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: BIND in -stable In-Reply-To: <20020507020339N.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: <20020506141111.N13051-100000@zoot.corp.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 7 May 2002, Makoto Matsushita wrote: > > matusita> Anybody knows when 8.3.2 is out? > > I've contacted ISC directly, and found that 8.3.2 will be released > real soon (yes, real soon). If it doesn't released before > May/11/2002, they'll release 8.3.1p1 for bugfix-release of 8.3.1. > > Any committers import new BIND code when released? Nectar did the import of 8.3.1 code, I've been looking at doing an import of the doc stuff just to get a feel for it. If I don't get to this in a timely manner, I will try to get someone else to do it... I agree that it's a priority. -- "We have known freedom's price. We have shown freedom's power. And in this great conflict, ... we will see freedom's victory." - George W. Bush, President of the United States State of the Union, January 28, 2002 Do YOU Yahoo!? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 14:13:50 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mrout1.yahoo.com (mrout1.yahoo.com [216.145.54.171]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 437C337B401 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 14:13:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from zoot.corp.yahoo.com (zoot.corp.yahoo.com [216.145.52.89]) by mrout1.yahoo.com (8.11.6/8.11.6/y.out) with ESMTP id g46LDXA53073; Mon, 6 May 2002 14:13:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dougb@localhost) by zoot.corp.yahoo.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) with ESMTP id g46LDW6k013064; Mon, 6 May 2002 14:13:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 14:13:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug Barton To: Slawek Zak Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: 2GB memory limit In-Reply-To: <20020506143614.A18521@prioris.mini.pw.edu.pl> Message-ID: <20020506141241.H13051-100000@zoot.corp.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 6 May 2002, Slawek Zak wrote: > Hi, > > Will 4.6 installation be bootable on 2GB+ machines? GENERIC paniced > because of swap space allocation problems in 4.4 and 4.5 I guess, so > direct installation on such machines was impossible. As I understand it, this definitely should not be the case. If it's still not working with 4.6-PRERELEASE could you send the details of the panic, and your hardware to this list? Thanks. -- "We have known freedom's price. We have shown freedom's power. And in this great conflict, ... we will see freedom's victory." - George W. Bush, President of the United States State of the Union, January 28, 2002 Do YOU Yahoo!? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 14:39:16 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from damnhippie.dyndns.org (12-253-177-2.client.attbi.com [12.253.177.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A31F37B406 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 14:39:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.22.42.2] (peace.hippie.lan [172.22.42.2]) by damnhippie.dyndns.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g46Lc5G56447; Mon, 6 May 2002 15:38:05 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org) User-Agent: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 5.01 (1630) Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 15:38:05 -0600 Subject: Re: Unable to alias IP's in 4.5 From: Ian To: Erich Zigler , Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <200205061243.38680.erichz@superhero.org> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > It seems from FreeBSD version 4.5 on I am unable to alias IP addresses to a > NIC card if the IP I am trying to alias has the same netmask as the > previously bound IP. > > I get nothing but a file exists error from ifconfig. > > I have been doing this since 3.4 so Im wondering what has changed. What changed is that the code now enforces that you do it the right way, which is to use 255.255.255.255 as the netmask for the alias IPs. That is, use the normal/proper netmask for the primary IP for that NIC, then use 255.255.255.255 for any alias IPs on the same subnet for that NIC. -- Ian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 19:16: 0 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from wall.polstra.com (wall-gw.polstra.com [206.213.73.130]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 106CF37B407 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 19:15:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vashon.polstra.com (vashon.polstra.com [206.213.73.13]) by wall.polstra.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g472FnD50731; Mon, 6 May 2002 19:15:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp@wall.polstra.com) Received: (from jdp@localhost) by vashon.polstra.com (8.11.6/8.11.0) id g472Fmb07039; Mon, 6 May 2002 19:15:48 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from jdp) Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 19:15:48 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200205070215.g472Fmb07039@vashon.polstra.com> To: stable@freebsd.org From: John Polstra Cc: kendall@jedis.com Subject: Re: fxp0: SCB timeout In-Reply-To: <000a01c1f51f$5ea50970$2501a8c0@fmepro.com> References: <000a01c1f51f$5ea50970$2501a8c0@fmepro.com> Organization: Polstra & Co., Seattle, WA Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In article <000a01c1f51f$5ea50970$2501a8c0@fmepro.com>, Kendall Gifford wrote: > I also have a Dell PowerEdge 1550 with 4.5-STABLE and had the same > SCB timeout problem with the fxp driver. Me too. Are you running an SMP kernel? I saw this problem the first and only time after I added a second CPU and switched to an SMP kernel. That's not enough data points to form any conclusion. The other unusual thing that was going on when this happened to me was that I was really hammering the system via a gigabit NIC in one of the PCI slots at the time. > but I did hear one suggestion that this was somehow related to advanced > power management. I rebuilt a kernel without APM by removing the line: > > device apm0 at nexus?... Nope, that's not it. I've never had APM configured on that machine. John -- John Polstra John D. Polstra & Co., Inc. Seattle, Washington USA "Disappointment is a good sign of basic intelligence." -- Chögyam Trungpa To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 19:45:31 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (castle.jp.FreeBSD.org [210.226.20.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D20237B403 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 19:45:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [::1]) by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.3) with ESMTP/inet6 id g472jHf80868; Tue, 7 May 2002 11:45:17 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org) Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: References: <20020507020339N.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> X-User-Agent: Mew/1.94.2 XEmacs/21.5 (bamboo) X-FaceAnim: (-O_O-)(O_O- )(_O- )(O- )(- -)( -O)( -O_)( -O_O)(-O_O-) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 13 From: Makoto Matsushita To: juha@saarinen.org Subject: Re: BIND in -stable Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 11:45:14 +0900 Message-Id: <20020507114514Q.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG juha> Just out of curiosity, why is version 8.x so desirable, and not juha> 9.x? Why isn't 9.x in the base -STABLE? It's another story and not a scope of my interests. If BIND9 gets enough maturity level for everybody's daily use, it would be a good option for that. But BIND9 is quite different from BIND8 (many existing features are lost by some reasons); I'm afraid that BIND9 for 4-stable breaks POLA. -- - Makoto `MAR' Matsushita To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 19:59:18 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net [167.206.5.10]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7882637B404 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 19:58:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from holden.nerdlabs.com (ool-18bb75de.dyn.optonline.net [24.187.117.222]) by mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.0 Patch 2 (built Dec 14 2000)) with ESMTP id <0GVQ002P1094D2@mta4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net> for stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Mon, 06 May 2002 22:58:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: by holden.nerdlabs.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8272A1B7; Mon, 06 May 2002 22:55:49 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 06 May 2002 22:55:47 +0000 From: Paul Dlug Subject: Re: fxp0: SCB timeout In-reply-to: <200205070215.g472Fmb07039@vashon.polstra.com> To: John Polstra , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: kendall@jedis.com Message-id: <200205062255.48215.paul@nerdlabs.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4] Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT References: <000a01c1f51f$5ea50970$2501a8c0@fmepro.com> <200205070215.g472Fmb07039@vashon.polstra.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Are you running an SMP kernel? I saw this problem the first and only > time after I added a second CPU and switched to an SMP kernel. That's > not enough data points to form any conclusion. The motherboard supports SMP but I only have a single CPU in so I disabled the SMP options. > The other unusual thing that was going on when this happened to me was > that I was really hammering the system via a gigabit NIC in one of the > PCI slots at the time. The PCI slots are free, I'm only using the onboard NIC's. It's not pushing that much traffic, it's just a webserver (and not at all heavily loaded). If the general consensus is that adding a PCI NIC and disabling the onboard will fix it, I'll go that route. But I'd rather try to understand what the actual problem is and hopefully get a fix for it. Does anyone have suggestions for further debugging? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 20: 2:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from vimfuego.saarinen.org (saarinen.org [203.79.82.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DA1937B408 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 20:01:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (helo=den2) by vimfuego.saarinen.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Red Hack)) id 174vEM-0006DF-00; Tue, 07 May 2002 15:01:34 +1200 Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 15:00:37 +1200 (New Zealand Standard Time) From: Juha Saarinen To: Makoto Matsushita Cc: "stable@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: BIND in -stable In-Reply-To: <20020507114514Q.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> Message-ID: X-Message-Flag: " " X-X-Sender: juha@vimfuego.saarinen.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi Makoto, On Tue, 7 May 2002, Makoto Matsushita wrote: > It's another story and not a scope of my interests. If BIND9 gets > enough maturity level for everybody's daily use, it would be a good > option for that. Seems OK here, but I admit that my installations aren't exactly heavy-duty. > But BIND9 is quite different from BIND8 (many existing features are > lost by some reasons); I'm afraid that BIND9 for 4-stable breaks POLA. Which existing features are you thinking of? I could be wrong, but my impression is that BIND 9 adds several features over BIND 8, not the other way round. -- Juha Saarinen To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 22:47:25 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (www.svzserv.kemerovo.su [213.184.65.80]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BB9637B401; Mon, 6 May 2002 22:47:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (eugen@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g475lJw5004905; Tue, 7 May 2002 13:47:19 +0800 (KRAST) (envelope-from eugen@www.svzserv.kemerovo.su) Received: (from eugen@localhost) by www.svzserv.kemerovo.su (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g475lJJE004904; Tue, 7 May 2002 13:47:19 +0800 (KRAST) Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 13:47:19 +0800 From: Eugene Grosbein To: stable@freebsd.org Cc: luigi@freebsd.org Subject: yesterday's 4.6-PRERELEASE: ipfw ... limit glitches Message-ID: <20020507134719.A3120@svzserv.kemerovo.su> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi! I've updated one of my servers to 4.6-PRERELEASE yesterday and see that firewall still procudes lots of junk to console and logs if you use 'limit' feature. That's very annoying if the server is under moderate load. I've seen a couple of PR's about this (f.e., kern/32600) but it's still there. Please consider fixing that or at least eliminate pollution of logs before 4.6-RELEASE. It's nearly impossible to use this feature without patching kernel now. Eugene Grosbein To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 23:29:23 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from skif.net (ns.skif.net [195.58.224.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC85B37B400 for ; Mon, 6 May 2002 23:29:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [195.58.224.122] (HELO dru.dn.ua) by skif.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.6) with ESMTP-TLS id 5025589 for stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 07 May 2002 09:29:13 +0300 Received: (from admin@localhost) by dru.dn.ua (8.12.3/8.12.3) id g476SNQ8004617 for stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 7 May 2002 09:28:23 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from admin) Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 09:28:23 +0300 From: "Vladislav V. Zhuk" To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: UTMP loses active users Message-ID: <20020507062823.GD1761@dru.dn.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi! I had upgraded my system to FreeBSD 4.6-PRERELEASE, but problem with loss active users from utmp is remained. Users login to system with pppd (dial-in server). This problem had appeared after upgrade on april (before all was working without any problem) PS: only pppd users loses only from utmp (with wtmp all right). with user who logged from ttyv* all right. -- Vladislav V. Zhuk (06267)3-60-03 admin@dru.dn.ua 2:465/197@FidoNet.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Mon May 6 23:51:49 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from vinyl2.sentex.ca (vinyl2.sentex.ca [199.212.134.13]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49D0B37B408; Mon, 6 May 2002 23:51:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from house.sentex.net (cage.simianscience.com [64.7.134.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by vinyl2.sentex.ca (8.12.3/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g476pcdd078905 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 7 May 2002 02:51:39 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020507024124.02f0e4d0@192.168.0.12> X-Sender: mdtancsa@192.168.0.12 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 02:51:41 -0400 To: stable@freebsd.org From: Mike Tancsa Subject: milter memory leak ? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I am working on a custom rbl type milter and thought I had a memory leak in my code.... However, I while stumbling around trying to track it down, I was a bit perplexed as to where it is. So I thought I would try with the sample milter to see if it behaved as expected. Much to my surprise, it too seems to just keep growning in memory consumption. i.e. blast a few emails at it, and the process grows and grows with additional email. shell1# ps -aux | grep rbl root 9298 0.0 0.8 6000 4272 p0 T 2:28AM 0:00.20 vim rbl.c root 9306 0.0 0.4 10424 2260 p2 S+ 2:29AM 0:00.28 ./rbl-sentex -p:/var/run/rbl-sentex root 10155 0.5 0.2 1844 880 p0 S+ 2:40AM 0:00.07 ./rbl-samp -p:/var/run/rbl-samp shell1# ps -aux | grep rbl root 9298 0.0 0.8 6000 4272 p0 T 2:28AM 0:00.20 vim rbl.c root 9306 0.0 0.4 10424 2260 p2 S+ 2:29AM 0:00.28 ./rbl-sentex -p:/var/run/rbl-sentex root 10155 0.0 0.2 1844 880 p0 S+ 2:40AM 0:00.07 ./rbl-samp -p:/var/run/rbl-samp shell1# ps -aux | grep rbl root 9298 0.0 0.8 6000 4272 p0 T 2:28AM 0:00.20 vim rbl.c root 9306 0.0 0.4 10424 2260 p2 S+ 2:29AM 0:00.28 ./rbl-sentex -p:/var/run/rbl-sentex root 10155 0.4 0.2 1908 892 p0 S+ 2:40AM 0:00.13 ./rbl-samp -p:/var/run/rbl-samp shell1# ps -aux | grep rbl root 9298 0.0 0.8 6000 4272 p0 T 2:28AM 0:00.20 vim rbl.c root 9306 0.0 0.4 10424 2260 p2 S+ 2:29AM 0:00.28 ./rbl-sentex -p:/var/run/rbl-sentex root 10155 0.3 0.2 1908 900 p0 S+ 2:40AM 0:00.19 ./rbl-samp -p:/var/run/rbl-samp shell1# ps -aux | grep rbl root 9298 0.0 0.8 6000 4272 p0 T 2:28AM 0:00.20 vim rbl.c root 9306 0.0 0.4 10424 2260 p2 S+ 2:29AM 0:00.28 ./rbl-sentex -p:/var/run/rbl-sentex root 10155 0.3 0.2 1908 900 p0 S+ 2:40AM 0:00.19 ./rbl-samp -p:/var/run/rbl-samp shell1# ps -aux | grep rbl root 9298 0.0 0.8 6000 4272 p0 T 2:28AM 0:00.20 vim rbl.c root 9306 0.0 0.4 10424 2260 p2 S+ 2:29AM 0:00.28 ./rbl-sentex -p:/var/run/rbl-sentex root 10155 0.3 0.2 1940 928 p0 S+ 2:40AM 0:00.25 ./rbl-samp -p:/var/run/rbl-samp Am I safe in assuming the sample milter in the documentation is free of error ? This is from /usr/src/contrib/sendmail/libmilter/docs/sample.html with the following simple Makefile CSRCS = samp.c OBJS = samp.o SRCS = ${CSRCS} CC = cc CFLAGS = -g -pipe CFLAGS = -I/usr/include/libmilter -pipe -g TARGET = rbl-sample LIBS = -pthread -lmilter all: ${TARGET} rbl-sample: ${OBJS} ${CC} ${OBJS} -o rbl-sample -L /usr/local/lib ${LIBS} I thought I would try here first as I didnt find any reference to said problem in comp.mail.sendmail. ---Mike -------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net/mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 1: 3:34 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from L312-216-1.iae.nsk.su (L312-216-1.iae.nsk.su [193.124.169.107]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E3F37B408 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 01:03:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from L312-216-1.iae.nsk.su (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by L312-216-1.iae.nsk.su (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g4783Kws001082 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 15:03:20 +0700 (NOVST) (envelope-from od@L312-216-1.iae.nsk.su) Received: (from od@localhost) by L312-216-1.iae.nsk.su (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g4783Kui001081 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 7 May 2002 15:03:20 +0700 (NOVST) Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 15:03:20 +0700 From: oleg dashevskii To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Q: how to get hardlinks in /stand properly updated? Message-ID: <20020507150320.A1037@lab15.iae.nsk.su> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, well, I used cd /usr/src/release/sysinstall; make all install to update /stand after installworld and installkernel. Handbook has told me that all files in this directory are hardlinked to sysinstall... After the new sysinstall binary had been installed, I looked at /stand and saw that nothing has been updated except for this only binary. `ls -i` showed that all other files share the same inode (comme il faut), and sysinstall has its own, a different one. How to update hardlinks automatically? I'm too lazy to do it by hand... J7 / be9 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 2:17:12 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from luxren2.boostworks.com (luxren2.boostworks.com [194.167.81.214]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A0EA37B405 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 02:16:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from boostworks.com (rn.lxlun.boostworks.com [192.168.8.100]) by luxren2.boostworks.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g479GKs06066; Tue, 7 May 2002 11:16:22 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200205070916.g479GKs06066@luxren2.boostworks.com> Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 11:12:35 +0200 (CEST) From: remy@boostworks.com Subject: Re: fxp0: SCB timeout To: paul@nerdlabs.com Cc: jdp@polstra.com, stable@FreeBSD.ORG, kendall@jedis.com In-Reply-To: <200205062255.48215.paul@nerdlabs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 6 May, Paul Dlug wrote: > > If the general consensus is that adding a PCI NIC and disabling the > onboard will fix it, I'll go that route. But I'd rather try to > understand what the actual problem is and hopefully get a fix for it. > Does anyone have suggestions for further debugging? > I spent around a week, a month ago, trying to understand the problem. If it may help, here is the tale: The machine is an Intel SCB2 (SMP, ServerWorks HE-SL based) with a 64 Bits/66Mhz PCI NIC using a 21154BC transparent PCI bridge and two 82559 A0 revision chips. Symptom, under heavy load only, were: - 82559 stopping sending (with packets ready to go in ring) - 82559 sending storms of Pause FC frames - Spurious 'SCB timeout' (82559 stopped) - Machine lock All this in various combination. In case of machine lock, IPMI records were indicating PCI protocol violation and then processors internal error. I tried various BIOS updates. No hope. I instrumented the fxp driver to monitor the 82559 internal states and found some strange transitions (Idle to Active to Stopped) and tested various hacks for resetting and restarting the chip like Intel does in its driver for the A0 revision. Nothing worked properly. I only found that refraining statistics readings from the chip render the chip a little bit more reliable. I also tried various PCI bridge setting for back-to-back transactions, timeout, errors forwarding, etc... with (mainly) worst results. I had a carefull reading of the 82559 manuals, 21154 documentations, release notes for these components, advisories to board designers, history of chips revisions, diffs in various releases of the Linux driver wrote at Intel. I ended up with a feeling that the really important instrument, for the definitive answer, is a PCI protocol analyzer. I then got _exactly_ the same card but with a FW21154BE transparent bridge and the same 82559 A0 revision chips. Everything worked without a glitch. My conclusion is that there is a big problem with the 82559 A0 revision PCI side in combination with 66Mhz bus, some bridges and either back-to-back transactions and/or MWI. To quote the Intel site, under PCI bridges: (bold, red heading text) "The 21154AC and 21154BC transparent PCI-to-PCI Bridges are _Not Recommended_ for new designs. For 33 MHz applications use the FW21154AE. For 66 MHz applications use the FW21154BE." Apparently, ServerWorks SL chipset (STL2) may encounter the problem with the 82559 (6 over 10 here, more likely with additional PCI cards like video). SCB2 (HE-SL based) uses 82550 and do not have the problem. As for some Pro 10/100+ (low profile version) using 21154BC (Not FW21154 !) that uses 82550 and works fine. Previous Pro 10/100B were using 21154 and 82558 with some rare problem. The Dell 1550 is an SCB2/SCSI (prototype) version using 82559 A0 and may have the problem. Just for the record, Intel drivers also have the SCB timeout syndrom with some configurations and, up to now, no definitive solution exists aside changing either the PCI bridge or the network chip. Good luck. RN. IeM To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 2:25:12 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ns2.wananchi.com (ns2.wananchi.com [62.8.64.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D63937B40B for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 02:25:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wash by ns2.wananchi.com with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (FreeBSD)) id 1751DQ-0003V8-00 for ; Tue, 07 May 2002 12:25:00 +0300 Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 12:25:00 +0300 From: Odhiambo Washington To: FBSD-STABLE Subject: SWAP Problem Message-ID: <20020507092500.GI33850@ns2.wananchi.com> Mail-Followup-To: Odhiambo Washington , FBSD-STABLE Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i X-Disclaimer: Any views expressed in this message,where not explicitly attributed otherwise, are mine alone!. X-Fortune: Man is a rational animal who always loses his temper when he is called upon to act in accordance with the dictates of reason. -- Oscar Wilde X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE i386 X-Best-Window-Manager: Blackbox X-Designation: Systems Administrator, Wananchi Online Ltd. X-Location: Nairobi, KE, East Africa. X-Uptime: 12:15PM up 3 days, 1:18, 1 user, load averages: 0.39, 0.64, 0.94 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello world! I am getting alot of these in my dmesg output: swap_pager_getswapspace: failed swap_pager_getswapspace: failed swap_pager_getswapspace: failed swap_pager_getswapspace: failed swap_pager_getswapspace: failed swap_pager_getswapspace: failed FreeBSD ns2.wananchi.com 4.5-STABLE FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE #4: \ Thu May 2 09:54:01 EAT 2002 wash@ns2.wananchi.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/SRV4.x i386 I've seen processes die because of this. I've checked the archives and Ben Smithurst suggested that one increases swap space. How does one do this on a LIVE system? Suggestions? Here is my space usage currently.. wash@ns2 ('tty') ~ 101 -> df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/da0s1a 4.7G 206M 4.2G 5% / /dev/da1s1f 4.7G 4.1G 299M 93% /backup /dev/da0s1f 6.9G 2.7G 3.7G 42% /home /dev/da0s1e 4.7G 2.0G 2.4G 46% /usr /dev/da1s1e 11G 9.2G 1.2G 88% /var /dev/da2s1e 16G 6.1G 9.0G 40% /home2 procfs 4.0K 4.0K 0B 100% /proc How can I use that space on the / for swap? Thank you -Wash -- Odhiambo Washington "The box said 'Requires Wananchi Online Ltd. www.wananchi.com Windows 95, NT, or better,' Tel: 254 2 313985-9 Fax: 254 2 313922 so I installed FreeBSD." GSM: 254 72 743 223 GSM: 254 733 744 121 This sig is McQ! :-) Maturity is only a short break in adolescence. -- Jules Feiffer To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 2:58: 5 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from atlantis.dp.ua (atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.46.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26BC137B408 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 02:57:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dmitry@localhost) by atlantis.dp.ua (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g479vet24918 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 12:57:41 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 12:57:39 +0300 (EEST) From: Dmitry Pryanishnikov To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: msdosfs serious performance problem with recent 4.5-STABLE In-Reply-To: <20020501001235.A792@grosbein.pp.ru.lucky.freebsd.stable> Message-ID: <20020507125250.P98604-100000@atlantis.dp.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello! On Tue, 30 Apr 2002, Eugene Grosbein wrote: > What's a reason of very slow writing to msdosfs (FAT32)? > I get no more than 350Kb/s with recent 4.5-STABLE. Using "systat -vm 1" you can see that msdosfs reads/writes are too short (their size are no more than cluster size AFAIK), and this increases number of I/O requests and limit performance. I don't know why msdosfs behaves so, it was always worked in this way ;( Sincerely, Dmitry Atlantis ISP, System Administrator e-mail: dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua nic-hdl: LYNX-RIPE To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 3: 1:56 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from papa.tanu.org (kame195.kame.net [203.178.141.195]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DBCE37B40A; Tue, 7 May 2002 03:01:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([3ffe:501:4819:1000:260:1dff:fe21:f766]) by papa.tanu.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g479sbL30933; Tue, 7 May 2002 18:54:38 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from sakane@kame.net) To: tim-lists@bishnet.net Cc: hm@hcs.de, dkelly@hiwaay.net, dwcjr@inethouston.net, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, sumikawa@FreeBSD.ORG, sakane@kame.net Subject: RE: port/racoon broken In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 5 May 2002 14:39:18 +0100" <012b01c1f43a$4153dc60$6401a8c0@ad.18hp.net> References: <012b01c1f43a$4153dc60$6401a8c0@ad.18hp.net> X-Mailer: Cue version 0.6 (011026-1440/sakane) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <20020507190433C.sakane@kame.net> Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 19:04:33 +0900 From: Shoichi Sakane X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 6 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > The old racoon port works well for me in those environments. > Hopefully someone will fix things before 4.6 gets released. there was a bug in the function to log messages. i have fixed it. new packages will be published soon. sorry for the mess. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 3:18:39 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from atlantis.dp.ua (atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.46.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BE3C37B404 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 03:18:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dmitry@localhost) by atlantis.dp.ua (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g47AIMG28230 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 13:18:23 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 13:18:22 +0300 (EEST) From: Dmitry Pryanishnikov To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: buffer size In-Reply-To: <20020501164552.GA34873@dru.dn.ua.lucky.freebsd.stable> Message-ID: <20020507131256.C98604-100000@atlantis.dp.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello! On Wed, 1 May 2002, Vladislav V. Zhuk wrote: > > src/sys/dev/syscons/scmouse.c dynamically allocates the cut_buffer > > array and computes the cut_buffer_size from the screen coordinates. > > So the buffer should be able to hold the whole screen's content. Do > > you change the screen's dimension after using the clipboard? > > I did't any changes. I use only 80x25 screen size in text mode > (without X). Therefore, scmouse.c computes the cut_buffer_size > incorrectly. Try to copy all screen and paste then. More specifically, it copies no more than 1024 characters (tested both on 4.2-RELEASE and 4.4-RELEASE (fill one of your virtual consoles with text, then select all screen, then switch to another console, start "cat >file" and paste the text, then press ^D twice - you'll see that file size will be no more than 1024). Sincerely, Dmitry Atlantis ISP, System Administrator e-mail: dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua nic-hdl: LYNX-RIPE To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 3:23:59 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from server.rucus.ru.ac.za (server.rucus.ru.ac.za [146.231.115.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B82FD37B406 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 03:23:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 77072 invoked from network); 7 May 2002 10:23:49 -0000 Received: from shell-fxp1.rucus.ru.ac.za (HELO shell.rucus.ru.ac.za) (10.0.0.1) by server.rucus.ru.ac.za with SMTP; 7 May 2002 10:23:49 -0000 Received: (qmail 61876 invoked by uid 1040); 7 May 2002 10:23:49 -0000 Date: 7 May 2002 10:23:49 -0000 Message-ID: <20020507102349.61875.qmail@shell.rucus.ru.ac.za> From: David =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sieb=F6rger?= To: wash@wananchi.com (Odhiambo Washington) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SWAP Problem Organization: Rhodes University Computer Users' Society In-Reply-To: <20020507092500.GI33850@ns2.wananchi.com> User-Agent: tin/1.5.11-20020130 ("Toxicity") (UNIX) (FreeBSD/4.5-STABLE (i386)) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Odhiambo Washington wrote: > I've checked the archives and Ben Smithurst suggested that one increases swap > space. > > How does one do this on a LIVE system? Suggestions? [snip] > How can I use that space on the / for swap? See section 6.11 of the handbook, and vnconfig(8). http://www.freebsd.org/handbook/adding-swap-space.html -- David Siebörger drs@rucus.ru.ac.za To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 3:27:58 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from skif.net (ns.skif.net [195.58.224.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15A8337B407 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 03:27:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [195.58.224.122] (HELO dru.dn.ua) by skif.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.6) with ESMTP-TLS id 5031906 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 07 May 2002 13:27:31 +0300 Received: (from admin@localhost) by dru.dn.ua (8.12.3/8.12.3) id g47AQluk014317 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 7 May 2002 13:26:47 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from admin) Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 13:26:47 +0300 From: "Vladislav V. Zhuk" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: buffer size Message-ID: <20020507102647.GZ1761@dru.dn.ua> References: <20020501164552.GA34873@dru.dn.ua.lucky.freebsd.stable> <20020507131256.C98604-100000@atlantis.dp.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020507131256.C98604-100000@atlantis.dp.ua> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 01:18:22PM +0300, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: > On Wed, 1 May 2002, Vladislav V. Zhuk wrote: > > > src/sys/dev/syscons/scmouse.c dynamically allocates the cut_buffer > > > array and computes the cut_buffer_size from the screen coordinates. > > > So the buffer should be able to hold the whole screen's content. Do > > > you change the screen's dimension after using the clipboard? > > > > I did't any changes. I use only 80x25 screen size in text mode > > (without X). Therefore, scmouse.c computes the cut_buffer_size > > incorrectly. Try to copy all screen and paste then. > > More specifically, it copies no more than 1024 characters (tested both > on 4.2-RELEASE and 4.4-RELEASE (fill one of your virtual consoles with text, > then select all screen, then switch to another console, start "cat >file" > and paste the text, then press ^D twice - you'll see that file size will be no > more than 1024). I know about this. I asked when this bug will be fixed? Who can do it? -- Vladislav V. Zhuk (06267)3-60-03 admin@dru.dn.ua 2:465/197@FidoNet.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 3:38:17 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gs166.sp.cs.cmu.edu (GS166.SP.CS.CMU.EDU [128.2.205.169]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 89D9B37B404 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 03:38:11 -0700 (PDT) To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: 4.5R: page fault - nfs related? From: Dan Pelleg Date: 07 May 2002 06:38:01 -0400 Message-ID: Lines: 83 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I've been getting the occasional panic on this NFS server. They would happen once a week or two, and seem to be correlated with heavy NFS activity. Recovering from such a crash takes a long fsck and creates lots of pieces in lost+found. It's running 4.5-RELEASE-p3, softupdates, quota. Last night it happened again, and, for the first time, I finally have a crash dump I can use. However I'm not sure what to do here. What should I be looking at? -- Dan Pelleg IdlePTD at phsyical address 0x0046c000 initial pcb at physical address 0x003c24c0 panicstr: page fault panic messages: --- Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x0 fault code = supervisor write, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc02a795a stack pointer = 0x10:0xed6939c4 frame pointer = 0x10:0xed693a14 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 99 (nfsd) interrupt mask = none trap number = 12 panic: page fault syncing disks... 7 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 giving up on 3 buffers Uptime: 18d0h54m26s (da2:ahc1:0:0:0): SYNCHRONIZE CACHE. CDB: 35 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (da2:ahc1:0:0:0): ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:20,0 (da2:ahc1:0:0:0): Invalid command operation code #0 dumpsys () at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:474 474 if (dumping++) { (kgdb) where #0 dumpsys () at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:474 #1 0xc01aa4eb in boot (howto=256) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:313 #2 0xc01aa8cc in poweroff_wait (junk=0xc0355d8c, howto=-1070245713) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:582 #3 0xc02f882a in trap_fatal (frame=0xed693984, eva=0) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:956 #4 0xc02f84fd in trap_pfault (frame=0xed693984, usermode=0, eva=0) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:849 #5 0xc02f80e7 in trap (frame={tf_fs = -311885808, tf_es = -749993968, tf_ds = 16, tf_edi = -311935296, tf_esi = -960925048, tf_ebp = -311870956, tf_isp = -311871056, tf_ebx = -956628416, tf_edx = 0, tf_ecx = -959221760, tf_eax = 0, tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 2, tf_eip = -1070958246, tf_cs = 8, tf_eflags = 66118, tf_esp = -901289984, tf_ss = -287237312}) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:448 #6 0xc02a795a in dqget (vp=0xeee11b40, id=100, ump=0xc6d45000, type=1, dqp=0xca476848) at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c:763 #7 0xc02a6d9f in getinoquota (ip=0xca476800) at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_quota.c:104 #8 0xc02aab94 in ufs_makeinode (mode=33204, dvp=0xef3e5200, vpp=0xed693c60, cnp=0xed693c74) at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_vnops.c:2168 #9 0xc02a81e8 in ufs_create (ap=0xed693bf8) at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_vnops.c:196 #10 0xc02aae9d in ufs_vnoperate (ap=0xed693bf8) at /usr/src/sys/ufs/ufs/ufs_vnops.c:2423 #11 0xc0227ba7 in nfsrv_create (nfsd=0xca669f00, slp=0xc7023700, procp=0xe5b320c0, mrq=0xed693df8) at vnode_if.h:106 #12 0xc023c7e6 in nfssvc_nfsd (nsd=0xed693e58, argp=0x807cc00 "", p=0xe5b320c0) at /usr/src/sys/nfs/nfs_syscalls.c:602 #13 0xc023c13b in nfssvc (p=0xe5b320c0, uap=0xed693f80) at /usr/src/sys/nfs/nfs_syscalls.c:306 #14 0xc02f8ad9 in syscall2 (frame={tf_fs = 47, tf_es = 47, tf_ds = 47, tf_edi = 0, tf_esi = 0, tf_ebp = -1077936788, tf_isp = -311869484, tf_ebx = 4, tf_edx = 1, tf_ecx = -3, tf_eax = 155, tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 2, tf_eip = 134518288, tf_cs = 31, tf_eflags = 647, tf_esp = -1077937216, tf_ss = 47}) at /usr/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:1157 #15 0xc02ed145 in Xint0x80_syscall () #16 0x8048135 in ?? () To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 4: 7:32 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gs166.sp.cs.cmu.edu (GS166.SP.CS.CMU.EDU [128.2.205.169]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0CCD137B400; Tue, 7 May 2002 04:07:28 -0700 (PDT) To: Eugene Grosbein Cc: stable@freebsd.org, luigi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: yesterday's 4.6-PRERELEASE: ipfw ... limit glitches References: <20020507134719.A3120@svzserv.kemerovo.su> From: Dan Pelleg Date: 07 May 2002 07:06:57 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20020507134719.A3120@svzserv.kemerovo.su> Message-ID: Lines: 27 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) XEmacs/21.1 (Cuyahoga Valley) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Eugene Grosbein writes: > Hi! > > I've updated one of my servers to 4.6-PRERELEASE yesterday > and see that firewall still procudes lots of junk to console and > logs if you use 'limit' feature. That's very annoying if the server is > under moderate load. I've seen a couple of PR's about this > (f.e., kern/32600) but it's still there. > > Please consider fixing that or at least eliminate pollution of logs > before 4.6-RELEASE. It's nearly impossible to use this feature without > patching kernel now. > > Eugene Grosbein I'll second that. Last time I got any kind of reply from luigi regarding this it was about his attempt to get it into 4.5. However nothing has happened since (except for this coming up in -ipfw every once in a while). If you look at the PR you'll see that the obvious fix exposes a kernel panic bug (which I also sent a patch for). I don't know if my patch is ok or not (I know I'm using it), but either way, this PR should have been closed long ago. -- Dan Pelleg To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 4:52:21 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mta6.snfc21.pbi.net (mta6.snfc21.pbi.net [206.13.28.240]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB4C437B400 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 04:52:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pacbell.net ([216.103.80.156]) by mta6.snfc21.pbi.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 (built May 7 2001)) with ESMTP id <0GVQ0088EOZ56Q@mta6.snfc21.pbi.net> for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 07 May 2002 04:52:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 04:54:47 -0700 From: Daniel Rudy Subject: Make buildworld on latest stable fails X-Sender: "Daniel Rudy" (Unverified) To: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List Reply-To: dcrudy@pacbell.net Message-id: <3CD7C087.9FA9D6E2@pacbell.net> Organization: Pacific Bell Internet User MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en]C-CCK-MCD (Win98; U) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, I've been experiancing a problem as of late. It seems that make buildworld fails when compiling the miniperl module. Here is the text of the failure: cc -O -pipe -I/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl/../../../../contr ib/perl5 -L/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl/../libperl -static -o miniperl miniperlmain.o perl.o g v.o toke.o perly.o op.o regcomp.o dump.o util.o mg.o hv.o av.o run.o pp_hot.o sv.o pp.o scope.o pp_ctl.o pp_sys. o doop.o doio.o regexec.o taint.o universal.o globals.o perlio.o -lm -lcrypt -lutil /usr/lib/libc.a(gethostnamadr.o)(.text+0x2a): undefined reference to `strcasecmprcasecmprcasecmprcasecmphostbydn sname' /usr/lib/libc.a(gethostnamadr.o)(.text+0x109): undefined reference to `casecmprcasecmprcasecmphostbydnsname' /usr/lib/libc.a(gethostnamadr.o): In function `gethostbyname2': gethostnamadr.o(.text+0x265): undefined reference to `ecmphostbydnsname' *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. Thinking it was some sort of problem in the source. I dumped the source code and loaded bran new from the cvsup3 server and I still get the same failure. Any ideas or suggestions? -- Daniel Rudy To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 5:13:56 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (whale.sunbay.crimea.ua [212.110.138.65]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55ADE37B401 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 05:13:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from ru@localhost) by whale.sunbay.crimea.ua (8.11.6/8.11.2) id g47CDOS89538; Tue, 7 May 2002 15:13:24 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ru) Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 15:13:24 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov To: Daniel Rudy Cc: FreeBSD Stable Mailing List Subject: Re: Make buildworld on latest stable fails Message-ID: <20020507121324.GJ26127@sunbay.com> References: <3CD7C087.9FA9D6E2@pacbell.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="3U8TY7m7wOx7RL1F" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3CD7C087.9FA9D6E2@pacbell.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --3U8TY7m7wOx7RL1F Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 04:54:47AM -0700, Daniel Rudy wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I've been experiancing a problem as of late. It seems that make > buildworld fails when compiling the miniperl module. Here is the text > of the failure: >=20 > cc -O -pipe -I/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl > -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl/../../../../contr > ib/perl5 -L/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl/../libperl > -static -o miniperl miniperlmain.o perl.o g > v.o toke.o perly.o op.o regcomp.o dump.o util.o mg.o hv.o av.o run.o > pp_hot.o sv.o pp.o scope.o pp_ctl.o pp_sys. > o doop.o doio.o regexec.o taint.o universal.o globals.o perlio.o -lm > -lcrypt -lutil > /usr/lib/libc.a(gethostnamadr.o)(.text+0x2a): undefined reference to > `strcasecmprcasecmprcasecmprcasecmphostbydn > sname' > /usr/lib/libc.a(gethostnamadr.o)(.text+0x109): undefined reference to > `casecmprcasecmprcasecmphostbydnsname' > /usr/lib/libc.a(gethostnamadr.o): In function `gethostbyname2': > gethostnamadr.o(.text+0x265): undefined reference to `ecmphostbydnsname' > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/src. > *** Error code 1 >=20 > Stop in /usr/src. >=20 > Thinking it was some sort of problem in the source. I dumped the source > code and loaded bran new from the cvsup3 server and I still get the same > failure. Any ideas or suggestions? >=20 Your /usr/lib/libc.a has apparently got broken. The correct and consistent /usr/lib and /usr/include are prerequisites for a successful "make world". Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age --3U8TY7m7wOx7RL1F Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE818TkUkv4P6juNwoRAouOAJ0eIg4DYqUOyQCGKuJMym3O/FZjVACfdO7y CwvgJLxVAdG8qiAiP8+ApfQ= =2wTU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --3U8TY7m7wOx7RL1F-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 5:25: 3 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (leviathan.inethouston.net [66.64.12.249]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6961937B405; Tue, 7 May 2002 05:24:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dwcjr (unknown [192.168.1.254]) by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 88DDD3198C0; Tue, 7 May 2002 07:24:52 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <001601c1f5c2$2e3c2a40$fe01a8c0@dwcjr> From: "David W. Chapman Jr." To: , "Shoichi Sakane" Cc: , , , , References: <012b01c1f43a$4153dc60$6401a8c0@ad.18hp.net> <20020507190433C.sakane@kame.net> Subject: Re: port/racoon broken Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 07:24:43 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ----- Original Message ----- From: "Shoichi Sakane" To: Cc: ; ; ; ; ; Sent: Tuesday, May 07, 2002 5:04 AM Subject: RE: port/racoon broken > > > The old racoon port works well for me in those environments. > > Hopefully someone will fix things before 4.6 gets released. > > there was a bug in the function to log messages. > i have fixed it. new packages will be published soon. > sorry for the mess. > Are you referring to the what causes this garbled output? host# /usr/local/sbin/racoon -F Foreground mode. 2002-05-07 07:23:01: INFO: main.c:168:main(): 2002-05-07 07:23:01: INFO: main.c:170:main(): @r ìû¿¿û¿¿h¯ host# /usr/local/sbin/racoon -F Foreground mode. 2002-05-07 07:23:01: INFO: main.c:168:main(): 2002-05-07 07:23:01: INFO: main.c:170:main(): @r ìû¿¿û¿¿h¯ 2002-05-07 07:23:01: INFO: main.c:171:main(): @(#)This product linked (http://www.openssl.org/) also when I run racoon -dF if there is a lot of activity I get core dumps or segfaults(I can't remember which one at the moment) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 6: 8:45 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from papa.tanu.org (kame195.kame.net [203.178.141.195]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97AE837B403; Tue, 7 May 2002 06:08:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([3ffe:501:4819:1000:260:1dff:fe21:f766]) by papa.tanu.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g47D22L32810; Tue, 7 May 2002 22:02:02 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from sakane@kame.net) To: dwcjr@inethouston.net Cc: tim-lists@bishnet.net, sakane@kame.net, hm@hcs.de, dkelly@hiwaay.net, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG, sumikawa@FreeBSD.ORG, sakane@kame.net Subject: Re: port/racoon broken In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 7 May 2002 07:24:43 -0500" <001601c1f5c2$2e3c2a40$fe01a8c0@dwcjr> References: <001601c1f5c2$2e3c2a40$fe01a8c0@dwcjr> X-Mailer: Cue version 0.6 (011026-1440/sakane) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <20020507221154R.sakane@kame.net> Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 22:11:54 +0900 From: Shoichi Sakane X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 17 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > > > The old racoon port works well for me in those environments. > > > Hopefully someone will fix things before 4.6 gets released. > > > > there was a bug in the function to log messages. > > i have fixed it. new packages will be published soon. > > sorry for the mess. > Are you referring to the what causes this garbled output? > host# /usr/local/sbin/racoon -F > Foreground mode. > 2002-05-07 07:23:01: INFO: main.c:168:main(): > 2002-05-07 07:23:01: INFO: main.c:170:main(): @r l { ? ? { ? ?h / i believe that my modification can fix these garbled output and some crashs. the problem was that the type of the parameter of plogv() in plog.c was incorrect. so racoon crashed at indefinite time. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 6:10:20 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ridge.aps.org (ridge.aps.org [149.28.1.5]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE5F237B406 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 06:10:11 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pcpaul.aps.org (lugnut.aps.org [149.28.3.182]) by ridge.aps.org (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA02592; Tue, 7 May 2002 09:09:59 -0400 (EDT) Received: from lugnut.aps.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pcpaul.aps.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7067FD6; Tue, 7 May 2002 09:09:59 -0400 (EDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Paul Dlug To: remy@boostworks.com Subject: Re: fxp0: SCB timeout Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 09:09:59 -0400 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.4] Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200205070916.g479GKs06066@luxren2.boostworks.com> In-Reply-To: <200205070916.g479GKs06066@luxren2.boostworks.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <200205070909.59285.paul@nerdlabs.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > The machine is an Intel SCB2 (SMP, ServerWorks HE-SL based) with a 64 > Bits/66Mhz PCI NIC using a 21154BC transparent PCI bridge and two 82559 > A0 revision chips. Thanks for all the info. It looks like this host is a 82555, I can't seem to get the PCI bridge revision out of dmesg. Searching around it looks like Intel has discontinued the 82555. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 6:30:39 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from luxren2.boostworks.com (luxren2.boostworks.com [194.167.81.214]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 307B237B419 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 06:29:58 -0700 (PDT) Received: from boostworks.com (rn.lxlun.boostworks.com [192.168.8.100]) by luxren2.boostworks.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g47DTms06802; Tue, 7 May 2002 15:29:49 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200205071329.g47DTms06802@luxren2.boostworks.com> Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 15:26:01 +0200 (CEST) From: remy@boostworks.com Subject: Re: fxp0: SCB timeout To: paul@nerdlabs.com Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <200205070909.59285.paul@nerdlabs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 7 May, Paul Dlug wrote: > >> The machine is an Intel SCB2 (SMP, ServerWorks HE-SL based) with a 64 >> Bits/66Mhz PCI NIC using a 21154BC transparent PCI bridge and two 82559 >> A0 revision chips. > > Thanks for all the info. It looks like this host is a 82555, I can't > seem to get the PCI bridge revision out of dmesg. Searching around it > looks like Intel has discontinued the 82555. > Look at pciconf -l output and the rev field. For example (from various machines): fxp0@pci2:12:0: class=0x020000 card=0x00018086 chip=0x12298086 rev=0x08 fxp2@pci0:3:0: class=0x020000 card=0x34108086 chip=0x12298086 rev=0x0d fxp0@pci2:4:0: class=0x020000 card=0x10f08086 chip=0x12298086 rev=0x05 fxp0@pci0:12:0: class=0x020000 card=0x30008086 chip=0x12298086 rev=0x08 Card is the mounting (NIC, MB, etc...). The Intel driver have a fairly complete list of models/makers. rev=0x08 for a chip 0x12298086 is a 82559 stepping A0 rev=0x0d for the same chip is a 82550 Stepping C. rev=0x05 is a 82558 B0 stepping. As a rule of thumb, roughly 4 revs are reserved per chips: 0-3 : 82557 4-7 : 82558 8-11: 82559 12-..: 82550 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 6:50:39 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from grindking.dyndns.org (pD9025D7B.dip.t-dialin.net [217.2.93.123]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E52F637B404 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 06:50:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by grindking.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 68E7A40BE; Tue, 7 May 2002 15:50:22 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 15:50:22 +0200 From: Michael Riexinger To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ipfilter problem Message-ID: <20020507135022.GA384@grind.grind.dom> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20020504223450.GA1025@grind.grind.dom> <20020505152314.B73550@mail.webmonster.de> <20020505133204.GA667@grind.grind.dom> <20020505184630.A76286@mail.webmonster.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020505184630.A76286@mail.webmonster.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun May 5 18:46:30 2002, Karsten W. Rohrbach wrote: > pass out quick on isp0 proto tcp from any to any flags S/SA keep state > pass out quick on isp0 proto udp from any to any keep state > > instead of the above one line should work. if it doesn't then give me a > slap on the head, i'm still a bit drunk from yesterday ;-) > That works but doesn't solve the problem. On the ipfilter mailinglist one has a similar problem with ipfilter 3.4.27 and solaris8 so i think the problem is ipfilter related. I think I'll switch to ipfw right now, Thanks anyway, Michael -- "Testing? What's that? If it compiles, it is good, if it boots up, it is perfect." -- Linus Torvalds To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 6:57:55 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1C6B37B409; Tue, 7 May 2002 06:57:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (marck@localhost) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g47Dvgt48413; Tue, 7 May 2002 17:57:43 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 17:57:42 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: stable@freebsd.org Cc: sos@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ata(4) -STABLE subsystem and tags MFC Message-ID: <20020507175632.V43118-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 6 May 2002, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: [snip] DM> Yeah, I see. By the way, I have a test machine handy, and also spare GXP DM> disc, so I'm going to build testcase. It's K6/2-450 at TX motherboard. DM> DM> What info do I need to send? (possibly, we should move the discussion of DM> the precise details to private mail, yeah?) Just boot this machine with GXP at second channel, turned tags on, and got these funny -- cut -- ad2: timeout waiting for READY ad2: invalidating queued requests - resetting ata1: resetting devices .. ad2: invalidating queued requests done ad2: no request for tag=0 ad2: invalidating queued requests ad2: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting ad2: invalidating queued requests ata1: resetting devices .. ad2: invalidating queued requests done ad2: no request for tag=0 ad2: invalidating queued requests ad2: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting ad2: invalidating queued requests ata1: resetting devices .. ad2: invalidating queued requests done ad2: no request for tag=0 ad2: invalidating queued requests ad2: READ command timeout tag=0 serv=0 - resetting ad2: invalidating queued requests ad2: trying fallback to PIO mode ata1: resetting devices .. ad2: invalidating queued requests done -- cut -- then drive worked at PIO Should I build debugging kernel? I would be very glad to help fixing this. Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 7: 0:47 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from obsidian.sentex.ca (obsidian.sentex.ca [64.7.128.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD96137B409 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 07:00:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from testbackup.sentex.net (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by obsidian.sentex.ca (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g47E2COV076289 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 10:02:12 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020507095214.04a593b0@marble.sentex.ca> X-Sender: mdtpop@marble.sentex.ca X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 10:02:43 -0400 To: stable@freebsd.org From: Mike Tancsa Subject: overriding NETINET6 builds for sendmail Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: By Sentex Communications (obsidian/20020220) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Is there a way to modify the sendmail build process via /etc/make.conf so that -DNETINET6 is always removed ? i.e. CFLAGS+= ${DBMDEF} ${NIS} -DMILTER -DNETINET6 -DTCPWRAPPERS ${MAPS} is CFLAGS+= ${DBMDEF} ${NIS} -DMILTER -DTCPWRAPPERS ${MAPS} Other than getting all the broken resolver sites in the world to fix the problem, this seems to be my only effective recourse. I can manually remove it from the 3 Makefiles, but was hoping there was an easier way to manage this via /etc/make.conf ? ---Mike -------------------------------------------------------------------- Mike Tancsa, tel +1 519 651 3400 Sentex Communications, mike@sentex.net Providing Internet since 1994 www.sentex.net Cambridge, Ontario Canada www.sentex.net/mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 7: 8: 9 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from tom.chem.tue.nl (tom.chem.tue.nl [131.155.80.7]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3739437B407 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 07:08:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from willy@localhost) by tom.chem.tue.nl (8.12.3/8.11.6) id g47E8128001525 for stable@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 7 May 2002 16:08:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from willy) Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 16:08:01 +0200 From: Willy Offermans To: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Difficulties accessing CDRW Message-ID: <20020507160801.A1497@tom.chem.tue.nl> Reply-To: W.K.Offermans@TUe.nl Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Does somebody know why I'm not able to mount my cdrw with mount -t cd9660 /dev/acd0c /cdrom/ ? And if I use mount -t cd9660 /dev/acd0a /cdrom/ instead, I can acces the CD. ************************************* W.K. Offermans Eindhoven University of Technology Department of Chemical Engineering Laboratory of Catalysis (SKA) building ST-W 4.27, PO Box 513 5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands Tel: 0(031) 40 247 37 81 Fax: 0(031) 40 247 50 32 Home: 0(031) 45 544 49 99 e-mail: w.k.offermans@tue.nl http://www.catalysis.nl To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 8:16: 8 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (castle.jp.FreeBSD.org [210.226.20.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07B8037B401 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 08:15:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [::1]) by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.3) with ESMTP/inet6 id g47FFlf60653; Wed, 8 May 2002 00:15:48 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org) Cc: stable@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: References: <20020507114514Q.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> X-User-Agent: Mew/1.94.2 XEmacs/21.5 (bamboo) X-FaceAnim: (-O_O-)(O_O- )(_O- )(O- )(- -)( -O)( -O_)( -O_O)(-O_O-) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 11 From: Makoto Matsushita To: juha@saarinen.org Subject: Re: BIND in -stable Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 00:15:46 +0900 Message-Id: <20020508001546A.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG juha> Which existing features are you thinking of? I could be wrong, juha> but my impression is that BIND 9 adds several features over BIND juha> 8, not the other way round. named(8)/rndc(8) doesn't support UNIX domain socket for controlling named's behavior, host-statistics and other statistics file is not supported, etc. Try grep(1) source code with CFG_CLAUSEFLAG_NOTIMP. -- - Makoto `MAR' Matsushita To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 8:20:36 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from freebsd.dk (fw-rl0.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.114]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 437CE37B40D; Tue, 7 May 2002 08:20:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from sos@localhost) by freebsd.dk (8.12.2/8.12.2) id g47FKBAh071075; Tue, 7 May 2002 17:20:11 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sos) From: Søren Schmidt Message-Id: <200205071520.g47FKBAh071075@freebsd.dk> Subject: Re: ata(4) -STABLE subsystem and tags MFC In-Reply-To: <20020507175632.V43118-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> To: Dmitry Morozovsky Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 17:20:11 +0200 (CEST) Cc: stable@freebsd.org, sos@freebsd.org Reply-To: sos@freebsd.dk X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL94b (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG It seems Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > DM> Yeah, I see. By the way, I have a test machine handy, and also spare GXP > DM> disc, so I'm going to build testcase. It's K6/2-450 at TX motherboard. > DM> > DM> What info do I need to send? (possibly, we should move the discussion of > DM> the precise details to private mail, yeah?) > > Just boot this machine with GXP at second channel, turned tags on, and got > these funny Hmm, could you mail me a complete dmesg of that system please ? -Søren To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 8:21:26 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from axl.seasidesoftware.co.za (axl.seasidesoftware.co.za [196.31.7.201]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E4BB37B414 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 08:20:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.seasidesoftware.co.za) by axl.seasidesoftware.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1756o3-0001to-00 for stable@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 07 May 2002 17:23:11 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: installworld broken from read-only NFS /usr/obj Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 17:23:11 +0200 Message-ID: <7303.1020784991@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi folks, I routinely run 'make installworld' from a read-only NFS-mounted /usr/src, using a read-only NFS-mounted /usr/obj . This allows me to perform builds on a non-production box and then upgrade all my servers from its obj tree. The last time I did this was a couple of weeks ago and it worked. Now I get the following error: make installworld ... ===> gnu/usr.bin/perl/library/SDBM_File cd sdbm && make all rm -rf libsdbm.a rm: libsdbm.a: Read-only file system *** Error code 1 If I use 'make -i', it is evident that this isn't all such errors are in the src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/library tree, but this is the first one encountered. It looks like the installworld target causes an attempted write to the obj tree, which is naughty. Any ideas? Ciao, Sheldon. PS: I searched the -stable list archives for "read-only AND NFS AND install AND error". To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 8:34:21 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rhodium.cix.co.uk (rhodium.cix.co.uk [194.153.21.68]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79DD737B403; Tue, 7 May 2002 08:34:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ctek-uk.com (126.234.35.212.in-addr.arpa.ip-pool.cix.co.uk [212.35.234.126]) by rhodium.cix.co.uk (8.9.3+Sun/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA03626; Tue, 7 May 2002 09:06:07 +0100 (BST) X-Envelope-From: alex@ctek-uk.com Message-Id: <200205070806.JAA03626@rhodium.cix.co.uk> From: "Alex" To: Subject: PC for sale Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 09:06:39 +0100 Reply-To: "Alex" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, We have a limited number of IBM Desktop PC's for sale: Pentium 166 MMX, 2.5 Gb Hard Drive, 64 Mb RAM, 3.5" Floppy, 52x CD-Rom drive, 15" SVGA Monitor, Keyboard and Mouse, with Windows 98 and Office XP PRO pre-installed, all for £200. For more info, visit us at www.ctek-uk.com/pc, email us at info@ctek-uk.com or call 0870 742 7816. Thanks, Paul To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 8:52:22 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EFAE37B406; Tue, 7 May 2002 08:52:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (marck@localhost) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g47Fpxb50942; Tue, 7 May 2002 19:51:59 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 19:51:59 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: =?KOI8-r?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= Cc: stable@freebsd.org, Subject: Re: ata(4) -STABLE subsystem and tags MFC In-Reply-To: <200205071520.g47FKBAh071075@freebsd.dk> Message-ID: <20020507192927.R43118-300000@woozle.rinet.ru> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-60708882-1020786719=:43118" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info. --0-60708882-1020786719=:43118 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=KOI8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Tue, 7 May 2002, Søren Schmidt wrote: SS> It seems Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: SS> > DM> Yeah, I see. By the way, I have a test machine handy, and also spare GXP SS> > DM> disc, so I'm going to build testcase. It's K6/2-450 at TX motherboard. SS> > DM> SS> > DM> What info do I need to send? (possibly, we should move the discussion of SS> > DM> the precise details to private mail, yeah?) SS> > SS> > Just boot this machine with GXP at second channel, turned tags on, and got SS> > these funny SS> SS> Hmm, could you mail me a complete dmesg of that system please ? Well, it's attached. Comments: Boot (system) disk at ata0, and tag-capable IBM disc is at ata1: ATA channel 0: Master: ad0 ATA/ATAPI rev 4 Slave: no device present ATA channel 1: Master: ad2 ATA/ATAPI rev 5 Slave: no device present Second attach is dmesg after 'fdisk ad2' If it's needed, I can get you access both to this machine and to its serial console (which I just made and tested). Debugging kernel with DDB is also ready. Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ --0-60708882-1020786719=:43118 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; name="donkey.dmesg" Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-ID: <20020507195159.B43118@woozle.rinet.ru> Content-Description: Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="donkey.dmesg" Q29weXJpZ2h0IChjKSAxOTkyLTIwMDIgVGhlIEZyZWVCU0QgUHJvamVjdC4N CkNvcHlyaWdodCAoYykgMTk3OSwgMTk4MCwgMTk4MywgMTk4NiwgMTk4OCwg MTk4OSwgMTk5MSwgMTk5MiwgMTk5MywgMTk5NA0KCVRoZSBSZWdlbnRzIG9m IHRoZSBVbml2ZXJzaXR5IG9mIENhbGlmb3JuaWEuIEFsbCByaWdodHMgcmVz ZXJ2ZWQuDQpGcmVlQlNEIDQuNi1QUkVSRUxFQVNFICMxOiBNb24gTWF5ICA2 IDIzOjE1OjIxIE1TRCAyMDAyDQogICAgcm9vdEB6aG9wYS5yaW5ldC5ydTov dmFyL29iai9saC9zcmMvc3lzL2d3aA0KQ2FsaWJyYXRpbmcgY2xvY2socykg Li4uIFRTQyBjbG9jazogNDUxMDg1MTA4IEh6LCBpODI1NCBjbG9jazogMTE5 MzM0NyBIeg0KQ0xLX1VTRV9JODI1NF9DQUxJQlJBVElPTiBub3Qgc3BlY2lm aWVkIC0gdXNpbmcgZGVmYXVsdCBmcmVxdWVuY3kNClRpbWVjb3VudGVyICJp ODI1NCIgIGZyZXF1ZW5jeSAxMTkzMTgyIEh6DQpDTEtfVVNFX1RTQ19DQUxJ QlJBVElPTiBub3Qgc3BlY2lmaWVkIC0gdXNpbmcgb2xkIGNhbGlicmF0aW9u IG1ldGhvZA0KVGltZWNvdW50ZXIgIlRTQyIgIGZyZXF1ZW5jeSA0NTEwMjQ1 OTAgSHoNCkNQVTogQU1ELUs2KHRtKSAzRCBwcm9jZXNzb3IgKDQ1MS4wMi1N SHogNTg2LWNsYXNzIENQVSkNCiAgT3JpZ2luID0gIkF1dGhlbnRpY0FNRCIg IElkID0gMHg1OGMgIFN0ZXBwaW5nID0gMTINCiAgRmVhdHVyZXM9MHg4MDIx YmY8RlBVLFZNRSxERSxQU0UsVFNDLE1TUixNQ0UsQ1g4LFBHRSxNTVg+DQog IEFNRCBGZWF0dXJlcz0weDgwMDAwODAwPFNZU0NBTEwsM0ROb3chPg0KRGF0 YSBUTEI6IDEyOCBlbnRyaWVzLCAyLXdheSBhc3NvY2lhdGl2ZQ0KSW5zdHJ1 Y3Rpb24gVExCOiA2NCBlbnRyaWVzLCAxLXdheSBhc3NvY2lhdGl2ZQ0KTDEg ZGF0YSBjYWNoZTogMzIga2J5dGVzLCAzMiBieXRlcy9saW5lLCAyIGxpbmVz L3RhZywgMi13YXkgYXNzb2NpYXRpdmUNCkwxIGluc3RydWN0aW9uIGNhY2hl OiAzMiBrYnl0ZXMsIDMyIGJ5dGVzL2xpbmUsIDIgbGluZXMvdGFnLCAyLXdh eSBhc3NvY2lhdGl2ZQ0KV3JpdGUgQWxsb2NhdGUgRGlzYWJsZQ0KcmVhbCBt ZW1vcnkgID0gNjcxMDg4NjQgKDY1NTM2SyBieXRlcykNClBoeXNpY2FsIG1l bW9yeSBjaHVuayhzKToNCjB4MDAwMDEwMDAgLSAweDAwMDlmZmZmLCA2NTEy NjQgYnl0ZXMgKDE1OSBwYWdlcykNCjB4MDAyYTgwMDAgLSAweDAzZmY3ZmZm LCA2NDI5MDgxNiBieXRlcyAoMTU2OTYgcGFnZXMpDQphdmFpbCBtZW1vcnkg PSA2Mjg1NzIxNiAoNjEzODRLIGJ5dGVzKQ0KYmlvczMyOiBGb3VuZCBCSU9T MzIgU2VydmljZSBEaXJlY3RvcnkgaGVhZGVyIGF0IDB4YzAwZmIwNDANCmJp b3MzMjogRW50cnkgPSAweGZiNGMwIChjMDBmYjRjMCkgIFJldiA9IDAgIExl biA9IDENCnBjaWJpb3M6IFBDSSBCSU9TIGVudHJ5IGF0IDB4YjRmMA0KcG5w YmlvczogRm91bmQgUG5QIEJJT1MgZGF0YSBhdCAweGMwMGZjMDgwDQpwbnBi aW9zOiBFbnRyeSA9IGYwMDAwOmMwYTggIFJldiA9IDEuMA0KT3RoZXIgQklP UyBzaWduYXR1cmVzIGZvdW5kOg0KQUNQSTogMDAwMDAwMDANClByZWxvYWRl ZCBlbGYga2VybmVsICJrZXJuZWwiIGF0IDB4YzAyODEwMDAuDQpLNi1mYW1p bHkgTVRSUiBzdXBwb3J0IGVuYWJsZWQgKDIgcmVnaXN0ZXJzKQ0KcGNpX29w ZW4oMSk6CW1vZGUgMSBhZGRyIHBvcnQgKDB4MGNmOCkgaXMgMHg4MDAwMDA1 Yw0KcGNpX29wZW4oMWEpOgltb2RlMXJlcz0weDgwMDAwMDAwICgweDgwMDAw MDAwKQ0KcGNpX2NmZ2NoZWNrOglkZXZpY2UgMCBbY2xhc3M9MDYwMDAwXSBb aGRyPTAwXSBpcyB0aGVyZSAoaWQ9NzEwMDgwODYpDQpVc2luZyAkUElSIHRh YmxlLCA2IGVudHJpZXMgYXQgMHhjMDBmZGRmMA0KbnB4MDogPG1hdGggcHJv Y2Vzc29yPiBvbiBtb3RoZXJib2FyZA0KbnB4MDogSU5UIDE2IGludGVyZmFj ZQ0KaTU4Nl9iemVybygpIGJhbmR3aWR0aCA9IDE0OTI3NjAxMSBieXRlcy9z ZWMNCmJ6ZXJvKCkgYmFuZHdpZHRoID0gNzQ5MDYzNjcgYnl0ZXMvc2VjDQpw Y2liMDogPEhvc3QgdG8gUENJIGJyaWRnZT4gb24gbW90aGVyYm9hcmQNCmZv dW5kLT4JdmVuZG9yPTB4ODA4NiwgZGV2PTB4NzEwMCwgcmV2aWQ9MHgwMQ0K CWNsYXNzPTA2LTAwLTAwLCBoZHJ0eXBlPTB4MDAsIG1mZGV2PTANCglzdWJv cmRpbmF0ZWJ1cz0wIAlzZWNvbmRhcnlidXM9MA0KZm91bmQtPgl2ZW5kb3I9 MHg4MDg2LCBkZXY9MHg3MTEwLCByZXZpZD0weDAxDQoJY2xhc3M9MDYtMDEt MDAsIGhkcnR5cGU9MHgwMCwgbWZkZXY9MQ0KCXN1Ym9yZGluYXRlYnVzPTAg CXNlY29uZGFyeWJ1cz0wDQpmb3VuZC0+CXZlbmRvcj0weDgwODYsIGRldj0w eDcxMTEsIHJldmlkPTB4MDENCgljbGFzcz0wMS0wMS04MCwgaGRydHlwZT0w eDAwLCBtZmRldj0wDQoJc3Vib3JkaW5hdGVidXM9MCAJc2Vjb25kYXJ5YnVz PTANCgltYXBbMjBdOiB0eXBlIDEsIHJhbmdlIDMyLCBiYXNlIDAwMDBmMDAw LCBzaXplICA0DQpmb3VuZC0+CXZlbmRvcj0weDgwODYsIGRldj0weDcxMTIs IHJldmlkPTB4MDENCgljbGFzcz0wYy0wMy0wMCwgaGRydHlwZT0weDAwLCBt ZmRldj0wDQoJc3Vib3JkaW5hdGVidXM9MCAJc2Vjb25kYXJ5YnVzPTANCglp bnRwaW49ZCwgaXJxPTI1NQ0KCW1hcFsyMF06IHR5cGUgMSwgcmFuZ2UgMzIs IGJhc2UgMDAwMDY0MDAsIHNpemUgIDUNCmZvdW5kLT4JdmVuZG9yPTB4ODA4 NiwgZGV2PTB4NzExMywgcmV2aWQ9MHgwMQ0KCWNsYXNzPTA2LTgwLTAwLCBo ZHJ0eXBlPTB4MDAsIG1mZGV2PTANCglzdWJvcmRpbmF0ZWJ1cz0wIAlzZWNv bmRhcnlidXM9MA0KCW1hcFs5MF06IHR5cGUgMSwgcmFuZ2UgMzIsIGJhc2Ug MDAwMDUwMDAsIHNpemUgIDQNCmZvdW5kLT4JdmVuZG9yPTB4MTBlYywgZGV2 PTB4ODAyOSwgcmV2aWQ9MHgwMA0KCWNsYXNzPTAyLTAwLTAwLCBoZHJ0eXBl PTB4MDAsIG1mZGV2PTANCglzdWJvcmRpbmF0ZWJ1cz0wIAlzZWNvbmRhcnli dXM9MA0KCWludHBpbj1hLCBpcnE9MTENCgltYXBbMTBdOiB0eXBlIDEsIHJh bmdlIDMyLCBiYXNlIDAwMDA2ODAwLCBzaXplICA1DQpmb3VuZC0+CXZlbmRv cj0weDExNDIsIGRldj0weDY0M2QsIHJldmlkPTB4MDINCgljbGFzcz0wMy0w MC0wMCwgaGRydHlwZT0weDAwLCBtZmRldj0wDQoJc3Vib3JkaW5hdGVidXM9 MCAJc2Vjb25kYXJ5YnVzPTANCgltYXBbMTBdOiB0eXBlIDEsIHJhbmdlIDMy LCBiYXNlIGUwMDAwMDAwLCBzaXplIDI0DQoJbWFwWzE0XTogdHlwZSAxLCBy YW5nZSAzMiwgYmFzZSAwMDAwNmMwMCwgc2l6ZSAgNA0KcGNpMDogPFBDSSBi dXM+IG9uIHBjaWIwDQppc2FiMDogPEludGVsIDgyMzcxQUIgUENJIHRvIElT QSBicmlkZ2U+IGF0IGRldmljZSA3LjAgb24gcGNpMA0KaXNhMDogPElTQSBi dXM+IG9uIGlzYWIwDQphdGFwY2kwOiA8SW50ZWwgUElJWDQgQVRBMzMgY29u dHJvbGxlcj4gcG9ydCAweGYwMDAtMHhmMDBmIGF0IGRldmljZSA3LjEgb24g cGNpMA0KYXRhMDogaW9iYXNlPTB4MDFmMCBhbHRpb2Jhc2U9MHgwM2Y2IGJt YWRkcj0weGYwMDANCmF0YTA6IG1hc2s9MDMgb3N0YXQwPTUwIG9zdGF0Mj0w MA0KYXRhMC1tYXN0ZXI6IEFUQVBJIDAwIDAwDQphdGEwLXNsYXZlOiBBVEFQ SSAwMCAwMA0KYXRhMDogbWFzaz0wMyBzdGF0MD01MCBzdGF0MT0wMA0KYXRh MC1tYXN0ZXI6IEFUQSAwMSBhNQ0KYXRhMDogZGV2aWNlcz0wMQ0KYXRhMDog YXQgMHgxZjAgaXJxIDE0IG9uIGF0YXBjaTANCmF0YTE6IGlvYmFzZT0weDAx NzAgYWx0aW9iYXNlPTB4MDM3NiBibWFkZHI9MHhmMDA4DQphdGExOiBtYXNr PTAzIG9zdGF0MD00MCBvc3RhdDI9MDANCmF0YTEtbWFzdGVyOiBBVEFQSSAw MCAwMA0KYXRhMS1zbGF2ZTogQVRBUEkgMDAgMDANCmF0YTE6IG1hc2s9MDMg c3RhdDA9NTAgc3RhdDE9MDANCmF0YTEtbWFzdGVyOiBBVEEgMDEgYTUNCmF0 YTE6IGRldmljZXM9MDENCmF0YTE6IGF0IDB4MTcwIGlycSAxNSBvbiBhdGFw Y2kwDQpwY2kwOiA8SW50ZWwgODIzNzFBQi9FQiAoUElJWDQpIFVTQiBjb250 cm9sbGVyPiAodmVuZG9yPTB4ODA4NiwgZGV2PTB4NzExMikgYXQgNy4yDQpj aGlwMTogPEludGVsIDgyMzcxQUIgUG93ZXIgbWFuYWdlbWVudCBjb250cm9s bGVyPiBwb3J0IDB4NTAwMC0weDUwMGYgYXQgZGV2aWNlIDcuMyBvbiBwY2kw DQplZDA6IDxORTIwMDAgUENJIEV0aGVybmV0IChSZWFsVGVrIDgwMjkpPiBw b3J0IDB4NjgwMC0weDY4MWYgaXJxIDExIGF0IGRldmljZSA5LjAgb24gcGNp MA0KYnBmOiBlZDAgYXR0YWNoZWQNCmVkMDogYWRkcmVzcyAwMDo2MDo1Mjow Mzo0ODozOSwgdHlwZSBORTIwMDAgKDE2IGJpdCkgDQpwY2kwOiA8QWxsaWFu Y2UgbW9kZWwgNjQzZCBWR0EtY29tcGF0aWJsZSBkaXNwbGF5IGRldmljZT4g KHZlbmRvcj0weDExNDIsIGRldj0weDY0M2QpIGF0IDEzLjANClRyeWluZyBS ZWFkX1BvcnQgYXQgMjAzDQpUcnlpbmcgUmVhZF9Qb3J0IGF0IDI0Mw0KVHJ5 aW5nIFJlYWRfUG9ydCBhdCAyODMNClRyeWluZyBSZWFkX1BvcnQgYXQgMmMz DQpUcnlpbmcgUmVhZF9Qb3J0IGF0IDMwMw0KVHJ5aW5nIFJlYWRfUG9ydCBh dCAzNDMNClRyeWluZyBSZWFkX1BvcnQgYXQgMzgzDQpUcnlpbmcgUmVhZF9Q b3J0IGF0IDNjMw0KaXNhX3Byb2JlX2NoaWxkcmVuOiBkaXNhYmxpbmcgUG5Q IGRldmljZXMNCmlzYV9wcm9iZV9jaGlsZHJlbjogcHJvYmluZyBub24tUG5Q IGRldmljZXMNCm9ybTA6IDxPcHRpb24gUk9NPiBhdCBpb21lbSAweGMwMDAw LTB4YzdmZmYgb24gaXNhMA0KZmRjMDogPE5FQyA3MjA2NUIgb3IgY2xvbmU+ IGF0IHBvcnQgMHgzZjAtMHgzZjUsMHgzZjcgaXJxIDYgZHJxIDIgb24gaXNh MA0KZmRjMDogRklGTyBlbmFibGVkLCA4IGJ5dGVzIHRocmVzaG9sZA0KZmQw OiA8MTQ0MC1LQiAzLjUiIGRyaXZlPiBvbiBmZGMwIGRyaXZlIDANCmF0a2Jk YzA6IDxLZXlib2FyZCBjb250cm9sbGVyIChpODA0Mik+IGF0IHBvcnQgMHg2 MCwweDY0IG9uIGlzYTANCmF0a2JkMDogPEFUIEtleWJvYXJkPiBmbGFncyAw eDEgaXJxIDEgb24gYXRrYmRjMA0KYXRrYmQ6IHRoZSBjdXJyZW50IGtiZCBj b250cm9sbGVyIGNvbW1hbmQgYnl0ZSAwMDY3DQphdGtiZDoga2V5Ym9hcmQg SUQgMHg0MWFiICgyKQ0Ka2JkMCBhdCBhdGtiZDANCmtiZDA6IGF0a2JkMCwg QVQgMTAxLzEwMiAoMiksIGNvbmZpZzoweDEsIGZsYWdzOjB4MWQwMDAwDQp2 Z2EwOiA8R2VuZXJpYyBJU0EgVkdBPiBhdCBwb3J0IDB4M2MwLTB4M2RmIGlv bWVtIDB4YTAwMDAtMHhiZmZmZiBvbiBpc2EwDQpmYjA6IHZnYTAsIHZnYSwg dHlwZTpWR0EgKDUpLCBmbGFnczoweDcwMDdmDQpmYjA6IHBvcnQ6MHgzYzAt MHgzZGYsIGNydGM6MHgzZDQsIG1lbToweGEwMDAwIDB4MjAwMDANCmZiMDog aW5pdCBtb2RlOjI0LCBiaW9zIG1vZGU6MywgY3VycmVudCBtb2RlOjI0DQpm YjA6IHdpbmRvdzoweGMwMGI4MDAwIHNpemU6MzJrIGdyYW46MzJrLCBidWY6 MCBzaXplOjMyaw0KVkdBIHBhcmFtZXRlcnMgdXBvbiBwb3dlci11cA0KNTAg MTggMTAgMDAgMDAgMDAgMDMgMDAgMDIgNjcgNWYgNGYgNTAgODIgNTUgODEg DQpiZiAxZiAwMCA0ZiAwZSAwZiAwMCAwMCAwNyA4MCA5YyA4ZSA4ZiAyOCAx ZiA5NiANCmI5IGEzIGZmIDAwIDAxIDAyIDAzIDA0IDA1IDE0IDA3IDM4IDM5 IDNhIDNiIDNjIA0KM2QgM2UgM2YgMGMgMDAgMGYgMDggMDAgMDAgMDAgMDAg MDAgMTAgMGUgMDAgZmYgDQpWR0EgcGFyYW1ldGVycyBpbiBCSU9TIGZvciBt b2RlIDI0DQo1MCAxOCAxMCAwMCAxMCAwMCAwMyAwMCAwMiA2NyA1ZiA0ZiA1 MCA4MiA1NSA4MSANCmJmIDFmIDAwIDRmIDBkIDBlIDAwIDAwIDAwIDAwIDlj IDhlIDhmIDI4IDFmIDk2IA0KYjkgYTMgZmYgMDAgMDEgMDIgMDMgMDQgMDUg MTQgMDcgMzggMzkgM2EgM2IgM2MgDQozZCAzZSAzZiAwYyAwMCAwZiAwOCAw MCAwMCAwMCAwMCAwMCAxMCAwZSAwMCBmZiANCkVHQS9WR0EgcGFyYW1ldGVy cyB0byBiZSB1c2VkIGZvciBtb2RlIDI0DQo1MCAxOCAxMCAwMCAxMCAwMCAw MyAwMCAwMiA2NyA1ZiA0ZiA1MCA4MiA1NSA4MSANCmJmIDFmIDAwIDRmIDBk IDBlIDAwIDAwIDAwIDAwIDljIDhlIDhmIDI4IDFmIDk2IA0KYjkgYTMgZmYg MDAgMDEgMDIgMDMgMDQgMDUgMTQgMDcgMzggMzkgM2EgM2IgM2MgDQozZCAz ZSAzZiAwYyAwMCAwZiAwOCAwMCAwMCAwMCAwMCAwMCAxMCAwZSAwMCBmZiAN CnNjMDogPFN5c3RlbSBjb25zb2xlPiBhdCBmbGFncyAweDEwMCBvbiBpc2Ew DQpzYzA6IFZHQSA8MTYgdmlydHVhbCBjb25zb2xlcywgZmxhZ3M9MHgxMDA+ DQpzYzA6IGZiMCwga2JkMCwgdGVybWluYWwgZW11bGF0b3I6IHNjIChzeXNj b25zIHRlcm1pbmFsKQ0Kc2lvMDogaXJxIG1hcHM6IDB4NDEgMHg1MSAweDQx IDB4NDENCnNpbzAgYXQgcG9ydCAweDNmOC0weDNmZiBpcnEgNCBmbGFncyAw eDEwIG9uIGlzYTANCnNpbzA6IHR5cGUgMTY1NTBBLCBjb25zb2xlDQpzaW8x OiBpcnEgbWFwczogMHg0MSAweDQ5IDB4NDEgMHg0MQ0Kc2lvMSBhdCBwb3J0 IDB4MmY4LTB4MmZmIGlycSAzIG9uIGlzYTANCnNpbzE6IHR5cGUgMTY1NTBB DQppc2FfcHJvYmVfY2hpbGRyZW46IHByb2JpbmcgUG5QIGRldmljZXMNCkJJ T1MgR2VvbWV0cmllczoNCiAwOjAzZmYwZTNmIDAuLjEwMjM9MTAyNCBjeWxp bmRlcnMsIDAuLjE0PTE1IGhlYWRzLCAxLi42Mz02MyBzZWN0b3JzDQogMCBh Y2NvdW50ZWQgZm9yDQpEZXZpY2UgY29uZmlndXJhdGlvbiBmaW5pc2hlZC4N CmJwZjogbG8wIGF0dGFjaGVkDQphZDA6IHN1Y2Nlc3Mgc2V0dGluZyBVRE1B MiBvbiBJbnRlbCBjaGlwDQpDcmVhdGluZyBESVNLIGFkMA0KYXI6IEZyZWVC U0QgY2hlY2sxIGZhaWxlZA0KYWQwOiA8U1QzNjUzMUEvMy4wNT4gQVRBLTQg ZGlzayBhdCBhdGEwLW1hc3Rlcg0KYWQwOiA2MjA0TUIgKDEyNzA2NDcwIHNl Y3RvcnMpLCAxMzQ0NiBDLCAxNSBILCA2MyBTLCA1MTIgQg0KYWQwOiAxNiBz ZWNzL2ludCwgMSBkZXB0aCBxdWV1ZSwgVURNQTMzDQphZDA6IHBpb21vZGU9 NCBkbWFtb2RlPTIgdWRtYW1vZGU9MiBjYmxpZD0wDQphZDI6IHN1Y2Nlc3Mg c2V0dGluZyBVRE1BMiBvbiBJbnRlbCBjaGlwDQpDcmVhdGluZyBESVNLIGFk Mg0KYXI6IEZyZWVCU0QgY2hlY2sxIGZhaWxlZA0KYWQyOiA8SUMzNUwwNDBB VlZBMDctMC9WQTJPQTUwSz4gQVRBLTUgZGlzayBhdCBhdGExLW1hc3Rlcg0K YWQyOiAzOTI2Nk1CICg4MDQxODI0MCBzZWN0b3JzKSwgNzk3ODAgQywgMTYg SCwgNjMgUywgNTEyIEINCmFkMjogMTYgc2Vjcy9pbnQsIDMyIGRlcHRoIHF1 ZXVlLCB0YWdnZWQgVURNQTMzDQphZDI6IHBpb21vZGU9NCBkbWFtb2RlPTIg dWRtYW1vZGU9NSBjYmxpZD0xDQpNb3VudGluZyByb290IGZyb20gdWZzOi9k ZXYvYWQwczFhDQphZDBzMTogdHlwZSAweGE1LCBzdGFydCA2MywgZW5kID0g MTI3MDY0NjksIHNpemUgMTI3MDY0MDcgOiBPSw0Kc3RhcnRfaW5pdDogdHJ5 aW5nIC9zYmluL2luaXQNCnN3YXBvbjogYWRkaW5nIC9kZXYvYWQwczFiIGFz IHN3YXAgZGV2aWNlDQpBdXRvbWF0aWMgYm9vdCBpbiBwcm9ncmVzcy4uLg0K --0-60708882-1020786719=:43118 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; name="donkey.tagged-ata" Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-ID: <20020507195159.T43118@woozle.rinet.ru> Content-Description: Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="donkey.tagged-ata" YWQyOiBpbnZhbGlkIHByaW1hcnkgcGFydGl0aW9uIHRhYmxlOiBubyBtYWdp Yw0KYWQyOiB0aW1lb3V0IHdhaXRpbmcgZm9yIFJFQURZDQphZDI6IGludmFs aWRhdGluZyBxdWV1ZWQgcmVxdWVzdHMNCiAtIHJlc2V0dGluZw0KYXRhMTog cmVzZXR0aW5nIGRldmljZXMgLi4gYXRhMTogbWFzaz0wMyBvc3RhdDA9NTEg b3N0YXQyPTAwDQphZDI6IEFUQVBJIDAwIDAwDQphdGExLXNsYXZlOiBBVEFQ SSAwMCAwMA0KYXRhMTogbWFzaz0wMyBzdGF0MD01MCBzdGF0MT0wMA0KYWQy OiBBVEEgMDEgYTUNCmF0YTE6IGRldmljZXM9MDENCmFkMjogaW52YWxpZGF0 aW5nIHF1ZXVlZCByZXF1ZXN0cw0KYWQyOiBzdWNjZXNzIHNldHRpbmcgVURN QTIgb24gSW50ZWwgY2hpcA0KZG9uZQ0KYWQyOiBubyByZXF1ZXN0IGZvciB0 YWc9MA0KYWQyOiBpbnZhbGlkYXRpbmcgcXVldWVkIHJlcXVlc3RzDQphZDI6 IFJFQUQgY29tbWFuZCB0aW1lb3V0IHRhZz0wIHNlcnY9MCAtIHJlc2V0dGlu Zw0KYWQyOiBpbnZhbGlkYXRpbmcgcXVldWVkIHJlcXVlc3RzDQphdGExOiBy ZXNldHRpbmcgZGV2aWNlcyAuLiBhdGExOiBtYXNrPTAzIG9zdGF0MD01MSBv c3RhdDI9MDANCmFkMjogQVRBUEkgMDAgMDANCmF0YTEtc2xhdmU6IEFUQVBJ IDAwIDAwDQphdGExOiBtYXNrPTAzIHN0YXQwPTUwIHN0YXQxPTAwDQphZDI6 IEFUQSAwMSBhNQ0KYXRhMTogZGV2aWNlcz0wMQ0KYWQyOiBpbnZhbGlkYXRp bmcgcXVldWVkIHJlcXVlc3RzDQphZDI6IHN1Y2Nlc3Mgc2V0dGluZyBVRE1B MiBvbiBJbnRlbCBjaGlwDQpkb25lDQphZDI6IG5vIHJlcXVlc3QgZm9yIHRh Zz0wDQphZDI6IGludmFsaWRhdGluZyBxdWV1ZWQgcmVxdWVzdHMNCmFkMjog UkVBRCBjb21tYW5kIHRpbWVvdXQgdGFnPTAgc2Vydj0wIC0gcmVzZXR0aW5n DQphZDI6IGludmFsaWRhdGluZyBxdWV1ZWQgcmVxdWVzdHMNCmF0YTE6IHJl c2V0dGluZyBkZXZpY2VzIC4uIGF0YTE6IG1hc2s9MDMgb3N0YXQwPTUxIG9z dGF0Mj0wMA0KYWQyOiBBVEFQSSAwMCAwMA0KYXRhMS1zbGF2ZTogQVRBUEkg MDAgMDANCmF0YTE6IG1hc2s9MDMgc3RhdDA9NTAgc3RhdDE9MDANCmFkMjog QVRBIDAxIGE1DQphdGExOiBkZXZpY2VzPTAxDQphZDI6IGludmFsaWRhdGlu ZyBxdWV1ZWQgcmVxdWVzdHMNCmFkMjogc3VjY2VzcyBzZXR0aW5nIFVETUEy IG9uIEludGVsIGNoaXANCmRvbmUNCmFkMjogbm8gcmVxdWVzdCBmb3IgdGFn PTANCmFkMjogaW52YWxpZGF0aW5nIHF1ZXVlZCByZXF1ZXN0cw0KYWQyOiBS RUFEIGNvbW1hbmQgdGltZW91dCB0YWc9MCBzZXJ2PTAgLSByZXNldHRpbmcN CmFkMjogaW52YWxpZGF0aW5nIHF1ZXVlZCByZXF1ZXN0cw0KYWQyOiBzdWNj ZXNzIHNldHRpbmcgUElPNCBvbiBnZW5lcmljIGNoaXANCmFkMjogdHJ5aW5n IGZhbGxiYWNrIHRvIFBJTyBtb2RlDQphdGExOiByZXNldHRpbmcgZGV2aWNl cyAuLiBhdGExOiBtYXNrPTAzIG9zdGF0MD01MCBvc3RhdDI9MDANCmFkMjog QVRBUEkgMDAgMDANCmF0YTEtc2xhdmU6IEFUQVBJIDAwIDAwDQphdGExOiBt YXNrPTAzIHN0YXQwPTUwIHN0YXQxPTAwDQphZDI6IEFUQSAwMSBhNQ0KYXRh MTogZGV2aWNlcz0wMQ0KYWQyOiBpbnZhbGlkYXRpbmcgcXVldWVkIHJlcXVl c3RzDQphZDI6IHN1Y2Nlc3Mgc2V0dGluZyBQSU80IG9uIGdlbmVyaWMgY2hp cA0KZG9uZQ0KDQo= --0-60708882-1020786719=:43118-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 9: 1:32 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from vista.netmemetic.com (bb-203-125-44-177.singnet.com.sg [203.125.44.177]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 778FA37B406 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 09:01:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by vista.netmemetic.com (Postfix, from userid 100) id 984E565; Tue, 7 May 2002 21:37:34 +0800 (SGT) Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 21:37:34 +0800 From: Ng Pheng Siong To: Chojin Cc: Ng Pheng Siong , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: buildworld fails in PAM Message-ID: <20020507213734.A342@vista.netmemetic.com> References: <20020503143829.C308@vista.netmemetic.com> <001d01c1f2e7$49fcdc80$0301a8c0@chojin> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <001d01c1f2e7$49fcdc80$0301a8c0@chojin>; from freebsd@tarakan-network.com on Fri, May 03, 2002 at 11:12:53PM +0200 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, May 03, 2002 at 11:12:53PM +0200, Chojin wrote: > From: "Ng Pheng Siong" > > I'm getting this error with "make buildworld": > > > > ===> libpam/modules/pam_ssh > .. > > I also had a problem with pam_ssh, not exactly the same error: > > building shared library pam_ssh.so > /usr/libexec/elf/ld: cannot find -lssh > *** Error code 1 > Stop in /usr/src/lib/libpam/modules/pam_ssh. > *** Error code 1 Heh heh, in my case it was user stupidity: I cvsup'ed using a stale supfile and failed to sync the crypto sources. -- Ng Pheng Siong * http://www.netmemetic.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 9:10: 3 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from ny-utica5a-435.aburny.adelphia.net (ny-utica5a-435.aburny.adelphia.net [24.49.197.179]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B80B337B403 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 09:09:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ny-utica5a-435.aburny.adelphia.net (localhost.here [127.0.0.1]) by ny-utica5a-435.aburny.adelphia.net (8.12.3/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g47G9rWS003025 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 12:09:54 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from dennis@ny-utica5a-435.aburny.adelphia.net) Received: (from dennis@localhost) by ny-utica5a-435.aburny.adelphia.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g47G9rSL003024 for FreeBSD-stable@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 7 May 2002 12:09:53 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 12:09:53 -0400 (EDT) From: Dennis Mathiasen Message-Id: <200205071609.g47G9rSL003024@ny-utica5a-435.aburny.adelphia.net> To: FreeBSD-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: ata & mitsumi CD Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Running 4.6-PRERELEASE, I can mount a cd ok, but when I try to copy a file from the cd I get: acd0: READ_BIG command timeout ata1: resetting devices and then: Fatal trap 12 page fault while in kernel mode... (etc.) and then a re-boot. I have tried reverting to the wd driver and included mcd in the kernel, but mcd never shows up in dmesg output. How can I (or can I) cause the use of this driver? mcd is for Mitsumi drives which apparently use a non-conforming ATAPI interface. However, until now it has worked. I'd sometimes get IO timeout messages, but nothing worse. Thanks. Dennis Mathiasen dennisma@adelphia.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 9:20:54 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from horsey.gshapiro.net (horsey.gshapiro.net [209.220.147.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ABA637B406 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 09:20:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from horsey.gshapiro.net (gshapiro@localhost [IPv6:::1]) by horsey.gshapiro.net (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g47GKjSd026923 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 7 May 2002 09:20:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gshapiro@localhost) by horsey.gshapiro.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g47GKjU3026920; Tue, 7 May 2002 09:20:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15575.65245.306227.878010@horsey.gshapiro.net> Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 09:20:45 -0700 From: Gregory Neil Shapiro To: Mike Tancsa Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: overriding NETINET6 builds for sendmail In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20020507095214.04a593b0@marble.sentex.ca> References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020507095214.04a593b0@marble.sentex.ca> X-Mailer: VM 7.00 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG mike> Is there a way to modify the sendmail build process via mike> /etc/make.conf so that -DNETINET6 is always removed ? No. mike> Other than getting all the broken resolver sites in the world to fix the mike> problem, this seems to be my only effective recourse. There is another way, from sendmail/README: +---------------------+ | DNS/RESOLVER ISSUES | +---------------------+ ... When attempting to canonify a hostname, some broken name servers will return SERVFAIL (a temporary failure) on T_AAAA (IPv6) lookups. If you want to excuse this behavior, include WorkAroundBrokenAAAA in ResolverOptions. However, instead, we recommend catching the problem and reporting it to the name server administrator so we can rid the world of broken name servers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 9:22:35 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from daemon.kr.FreeBSD.org (daemon.kr.freebsd.org [211.176.62.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C89AB37B40A for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 09:21:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gradius.wdb.co.kr (daemon [211.176.62.31]) by daemon.kr.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B83258F60C for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 01:21:45 +0900 (KST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gradius.wdb.co.kr (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g47GLdHS006567 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 01:21:41 +0900 (KST) (envelope-from cjh@kr.FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 01:21:39 +0900 (KST) Message-Id: <20020508.012139.41636609.cjh@kr.FreeBSD.org> To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: ata recognition problem in 4.6-PRE From: CHOI Junho Organization: Korea FreeBSD Users Gruop X-URL: http://www.kr.FreeBSD.org/~cjh X-Mailer: Mew version 3.0.55 on Emacs 21.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, In some point of 4.5-STABLE, my machine won't boot due to probe failure of ad2 device. This is part of dmesg with 4.5-RELEASE(GENERIC kernel): FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE #0: Mon Jan 28 14:31:56 GMT 2002 murray@builder.freebsdmall.com:/usr/src/sys/compile/GENERIC Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Pentium II/Pentium II Xeon/Celeron (350.80-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x652 Stepping = 2 Features=0x183f9ff real memory = 134152192 (131008K bytes) ... ad0: 10300MB [20928/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA33 ad1: 6149MB [13328/15/63] at ata0-slave UDMA33 ata1-master: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 compliant cable ad2: 19623MB [39870/16/63] at ata1-master UDMA33 acd0: CDROM at ata1-slave using PIO4 As you see, I have 4 ATA device(3 HDD, 1 CD-ROM). Here is same part of dmesg with 4.6-PRERELEASE(built yesterday, but same thing happened some weeks ago): FreeBSD 4.6-PRERELEASE #4: Tue May 7 03:10:19 KST 2002 root@gnomaniac.myhome:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Pentium II/Pentium II Xeon/Celeron (350.80-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x652 Stepping = 2 Features=0x183f9ff ... ad0: 10300MB [20928/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA33 ad1: 6149MB [13328/15/63] at ata0-slave UDMA33 ad2: 6271MB <\^A! \^P A\^A! ! 0> [16383/16/49] at ata1-master PIO0 acd0: CDROM at ata1-slave PIO4 ad2 device is recognized incorrectly, and I can't mount partitions in ad2 disk so boot is failed. Is it a known problem? I put two dmesg files on web, so if you want to look more closer, please refer: http://www.kr.freebsd.org/~cjh/misc/tmp/dmesg.45 (4.5-RELEASE) http://www.kr.freebsd.org/~cjh/misc/tmp/dmesg.buggy (4.6-PRERELEASE) ATA controller is probed as: atapci0: port 0xf000-0xf00f at device 7.1 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 There is nothing special ata configuration in kernel. Just compiled with GENERIC. -- +++ Any opinions in this posting are my own and not those of my employers +++ CHOI Junho [sleeping now] [while sleeping] Korea FreeBSD Users Group Web Data Bank To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 9:26:44 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from horsey.gshapiro.net (horsey.gshapiro.net [209.220.147.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 894B437B403 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 09:26:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from horsey.gshapiro.net (gshapiro@localhost [IPv6:::1]) by horsey.gshapiro.net (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g47GQeSd027048 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 7 May 2002 09:26:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gshapiro@localhost) by horsey.gshapiro.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g47GQdWJ027045; Tue, 7 May 2002 09:26:39 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15576.63.850937.404110@horsey.gshapiro.net> Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 09:26:39 -0700 From: Gregory Neil Shapiro To: Mike Tancsa Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: milter memory leak ? In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20020507024124.02f0e4d0@192.168.0.12> References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020507024124.02f0e4d0@192.168.0.12> X-Mailer: VM 7.00 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG mike> Am I safe in assuming the sample milter in the documentation is free of mike> error ? This is from No, I just found one. By the way, you should probably mail sendmail-questions@sendmail.org for sendmail related questions, not freebsd-stable. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 9:29:46 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from obsidian.sentex.ca (obsidian.sentex.ca [64.7.128.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 001AA37B400; Tue, 7 May 2002 09:29:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from testbackup.sentex.net (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by obsidian.sentex.ca (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g47GVFKK084707; Tue, 7 May 2002 12:31:16 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020507123118.03537348@marble.sentex.ca> X-Sender: mdtpop@marble.sentex.ca X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 12:31:47 -0400 To: Gregory Neil Shapiro From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: overriding NETINET6 builds for sendmail Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <15575.65245.306227.878010@horsey.gshapiro.net> References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020507095214.04a593b0@marble.sentex.ca> <5.1.0.14.0.20020507095214.04a593b0@marble.sentex.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: By Sentex Communications (obsidian/20020220) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 09:20 AM 07/05/2002 -0700, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: >want to excuse this behavior, include WorkAroundBrokenAAAA in I had been using that, but it does not seem to work. e.g. the domain region.peel.on.ca ---Mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 9:31:26 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from horsey.gshapiro.net (horsey.gshapiro.net [209.220.147.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8690E37B407 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 09:31:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from horsey.gshapiro.net (gshapiro@localhost [IPv6:::1]) by horsey.gshapiro.net (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g47GVJSd027096 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 7 May 2002 09:31:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gshapiro@localhost) by horsey.gshapiro.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g47GVIDk027093; Tue, 7 May 2002 09:31:18 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15576.342.798425.971046@horsey.gshapiro.net> Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 09:31:18 -0700 From: Gregory Neil Shapiro To: Mike Tancsa Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: overriding NETINET6 builds for sendmail In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20020507123118.03537348@marble.sentex.ca> References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020507095214.04a593b0@marble.sentex.ca> <5.1.0.14.0.20020507123118.03537348@marble.sentex.ca> X-Mailer: VM 7.00 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG mike> At 09:20 AM 07/05/2002 -0700, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: >> want to excuse this behavior, include WorkAroundBrokenAAAA in mike> I had been using that, but it does not seem to work. e.g. the domain mike> region.peel.on.ca How doesn't it work? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 9:34:52 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from obsidian.sentex.ca (obsidian.sentex.ca [64.7.128.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53EA637B400; Tue, 7 May 2002 09:34:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from testbackup.sentex.net (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by obsidian.sentex.ca (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g47GaLKK084938; Tue, 7 May 2002 12:36:21 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020507123433.0359dc78@marble.sentex.ca> X-Sender: mdtpop@marble.sentex.ca X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 12:36:53 -0400 To: Gregory Neil Shapiro From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: overriding NETINET6 builds for sendmail Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <15576.342.798425.971046@horsey.gshapiro.net> References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020507123118.03537348@marble.sentex.ca> <5.1.0.14.0.20020507095214.04a593b0@marble.sentex.ca> <5.1.0.14.0.20020507123118.03537348@marble.sentex.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: By Sentex Communications (obsidian/20020220) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 09:31 AM 07/05/2002 -0700, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: >mike> At 09:20 AM 07/05/2002 -0700, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: > >> want to excuse this behavior, include WorkAroundBrokenAAAA in > >mike> I had been using that, but it does not seem to work. e.g. the domain >mike> region.peel.on.ca > >How doesn't it work? May 7 00:04:35 granite sm-mta[61324]: g4740ZLu061324: ruleset=check_mail, arg1=, relay=smtp2.sentex.ca [199.212.134.9], reject=451 4.1.8 Domain of sender address CamachoM@Region.Peel.ON.CA does not resolve I have (had) define(`confBIND_OPTS', `+WorkAroundBrokenAAAA')dnl But still the problem of the domain "not resolving" ---Mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 9:38:33 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from horsey.gshapiro.net (horsey.gshapiro.net [209.220.147.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F07F837B406 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 09:38:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from horsey.gshapiro.net (gshapiro@localhost [IPv6:::1]) by horsey.gshapiro.net (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g47GcNSd027194 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 7 May 2002 09:38:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gshapiro@localhost) by horsey.gshapiro.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g47GcNEC027191; Tue, 7 May 2002 09:38:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15576.767.281434.12880@horsey.gshapiro.net> Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 09:38:23 -0700 From: Gregory Neil Shapiro To: Mike Tancsa Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: overriding NETINET6 builds for sendmail In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20020507123433.0359dc78@marble.sentex.ca> References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020507123118.03537348@marble.sentex.ca> <5.1.0.14.0.20020507095214.04a593b0@marble.sentex.ca> <5.1.0.14.0.20020507123433.0359dc78@marble.sentex.ca> X-Mailer: VM 7.00 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG mike> May 7 00:04:35 granite sm-mta[61324]: g4740ZLu061324: mike> ruleset=check_mail, arg1=, mike> relay=smtp2.sentex.ca [199.212.134.9], reject=451 4.1.8 Domain of mike> sender address CamachoM@Region.Peel.ON.CA does not resolve mike> I have (had) mike> define(`confBIND_OPTS', `+WorkAroundBrokenAAAA')dnl mike> But still the problem of the domain "not resolving" Are you sure /etc/mail/sendmail.cf was rebuilt and the daemon restarted? Without the option I get: # sendmail -bs ... MAIL From: 451 4.1.8 Domain of sender address user@region.peel.on.ca does not resolve But with it, I get: # sendmail -bs -OResolverOptions=+WorkAroundBrokenAAAA ... MAIL From: 250 2.1.0 ... Sender ok To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 9:43:17 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from damnhippie.dyndns.org (12-253-177-2.client.attbi.com [12.253.177.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5CEF37B401 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 09:43:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.22.42.2] (peace.hippie.lan [172.22.42.2]) by damnhippie.dyndns.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g47GhBG64680 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 10:43:11 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org) User-Agent: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 5.01 (1630) Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 10:43:14 -0600 Subject: Re: overriding NETINET6 builds for sendmail From: Ian To: freebsd-stable Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20020507095214.04a593b0@marble.sentex.ca> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > Is there a way to modify the sendmail build process via /etc/make.conf so > that -DNETINET6 is always removed ? > > i.e. > CFLAGS+= ${DBMDEF} ${NIS} -DMILTER -DNETINET6 -DTCPWRAPPERS ${MAPS} > is > CFLAGS+= ${DBMDEF} ${NIS} -DMILTER -DTCPWRAPPERS ${MAPS} > > Other than getting all the broken resolver sites in the world to fix the > problem, this seems to be my only effective recourse. > > I can manually remove it from the 3 Makefiles, but was hoping there was an > easier way to manage this via /etc/make.conf ? > Add the following to your /etc/make.conf SENDMAIL_CFLAGS= -UNETINET6 According to the GCC manual, -U is processed after all -D on the command line, so even if it appears earlier than the -DNETINET6 on the command line it should have the effect of undefining the macro. Of course, that's a literal answer to the question you asked, and doesn't imply that you should discount anything Gregory is saying, since when it comes to sendmail, he's da man. -- Ian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 9:47:37 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from obsidian.sentex.ca (obsidian.sentex.ca [64.7.128.101]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A9ED37B400 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 09:47:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from testbackup.sentex.net (pyroxene.sentex.ca [199.212.134.18]) by obsidian.sentex.ca (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g47Gn4KK085676; Tue, 7 May 2002 12:49:05 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.0.20020507124801.0351f178@marble.sentex.ca> X-Sender: mdtpop@marble.sentex.ca X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.1 Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 12:49:36 -0400 To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Mike Tancsa Subject: Re: overriding NETINET6 builds for sendmail In-Reply-To: References: <5.1.0.14.0.20020507095214.04a593b0@marble.sentex.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: By Sentex Communications (obsidian/20020220) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 10:43 AM 07/05/2002 -0600, Ian wrote: >Add the following to your /etc/make.conf > > SENDMAIL_CFLAGS= -UNETINET6 Excellent! Thanks, I didnt know about that form. >Of course, that's a literal answer to the question you asked, and doesn't >imply that you should discount anything Gregory is saying, since when it >comes to sendmail, he's da man. He certainly is :) I am going to try and rebuild and retest my original configuration to make sure its not just pilot error on my part. ---Mike To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 10: 6:26 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mta6.snfc21.pbi.net (mta6.snfc21.pbi.net [206.13.28.240]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C825F37B400; Tue, 7 May 2002 10:06:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pacbell.net ([216.103.80.156]) by mta6.snfc21.pbi.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 (built May 7 2001)) with ESMTP id <0GVR008113IH6Y@mta6.snfc21.pbi.net>; Tue, 07 May 2002 10:06:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 10:08:46 -0700 From: Daniel Rudy Subject: Re: Make buildworld on latest stable fails X-Sender: "Daniel Rudy" (Unverified) To: Ruslan Ermilov , FreeBSD Stable Mailing List Reply-To: dcrudy@pacbell.net Message-id: <3CD80A1E.7B75F12A@pacbell.net> Organization: Pacific Bell Internet User MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.79 [en]C-CCK-MCD (Win98; U) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en References: <3CD7C087.9FA9D6E2@pacbell.net> <20020507121324.GJ26127@sunbay.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 04:54:47AM -0700, Daniel Rudy wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I've been experiancing a problem as of late. It seems that make > > buildworld fails when compiling the miniperl module. Here is the text > > of the failure: > > > > cc -O -pipe -I/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl > > -I/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl/../../../../contr > > ib/perl5 -L/usr/obj/usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl/../libperl > > -static -o miniperl miniperlmain.o perl.o g > > v.o toke.o perly.o op.o regcomp.o dump.o util.o mg.o hv.o av.o run.o > > pp_hot.o sv.o pp.o scope.o pp_ctl.o pp_sys. > > o doop.o doio.o regexec.o taint.o universal.o globals.o perlio.o -lm > > -lcrypt -lutil > > /usr/lib/libc.a(gethostnamadr.o)(.text+0x2a): undefined reference to > > `strcasecmprcasecmprcasecmprcasecmphostbydn > > sname' > > /usr/lib/libc.a(gethostnamadr.o)(.text+0x109): undefined reference to > > `casecmprcasecmprcasecmphostbydnsname' > > /usr/lib/libc.a(gethostnamadr.o): In function `gethostbyname2': > > gethostnamadr.o(.text+0x265): undefined reference to `ecmphostbydnsname' > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/miniperl. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/src. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/src. > > *** Error code 1 > > > > Stop in /usr/src. > > > > Thinking it was some sort of problem in the source. I dumped the source > > code and loaded bran new from the cvsup3 server and I still get the same > > failure. Any ideas or suggestions? > > > Your /usr/lib/libc.a has apparently got broken. The correct and consistent > /usr/lib and /usr/include are prerequisites for a successful "make world". > > Cheers, > -- > Ruslan Ermilov Sysadmin and DBA, > ru@sunbay.com Sunbay Software AG, > ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer, > +380.652.512.251 Simferopol, Ukraine > > http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve > http://www.oracle.com Enabling The Information Age > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature In that case, how do I fix it? I checked the dates of the files, and everything seems to be Apr 29, with a few exceptions. I'm hoping that I don't have to reinstall the system. -- Daniel Rudy To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 10:39:39 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from twirl.bitdance.com (twirl.bitdance.com [208.210.83.50]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7238F37B40C for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 10:39:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (bitz@localhost) by twirl.bitdance.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g47HdIe32298; Tue, 7 May 2002 13:39:18 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from bitz@twirl.bitdance.com) Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 13:39:17 -0400 (EDT) From: "R. David Murray" To: Ian Cc: Erich Zigler , Subject: Re: Unable to alias IP's in 4.5 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20020507133834.I31920-100000@twirl.bitdance.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 6 May 2002, Ian wrote: > What changed is that the code now enforces that you do it the right way, > which is to use 255.255.255.255 as the netmask for the alias IPs. That is, > use the normal/proper netmask for the primary IP for that NIC, then use > 255.255.255.255 for any alias IPs on the same subnet for that NIC. That's rather counter-intuitive. Is that behavior mandated by some standard or other? --RDM To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 10:43: 9 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from beck.quonix.net (beck.quonix.net [64.239.136.146]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F9B637B404 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 10:43:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pcp01324074pcs.neave01.pa.comcast.net (pcp01324074pcs.neave01.pa.comcast.net [68.81.22.158]) by beck.quonix.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g47HTDZ33127 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 10:29:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from john@essenz.com) Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 13:43:04 -0400 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v481) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Stable supfile From: John Von Essen To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.481) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Yesterday I wanted to cvsup to stable and make world. In my supfile is "RELENG_4" After cvsup and make world, uname returns: FreeBSD hostname 4.6-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 4.6-PRERELEASE #0: Tue May 7 12:35:49 EDT 2002 Is there a reason why this happened? I was expecting and wanting 4.5-STABLE. -john To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 10:45:51 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from geeky.nedod.org (ns1.nedod.org [66.92.68.61]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11D3537B403 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 10:45:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from geeky.nedod.org (localhost.nedod.org [127.0.0.1]) by geeky.nedod.org (8.11.5/8.11.5) with ESMTP id g47Hjiq11678 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 13:45:44 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from cookson@geeky.nedod.org) Message-Id: <200205071745.g47Hjiq11678@geeky.nedod.org> To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Stable supfile In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 07 May 2002 13:43:04 EDT." Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 13:45:44 -0400 From: Dean Cookson Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Yesterday I wanted to cvsup to stable and make world. > > In my supfile is "RELENG_4" > > After cvsup and make world, uname returns: > > FreeBSD hostname 4.6-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 4.6-PRERELEASE #0: Tue May 7 > 12:35:49 EDT 2002 > > Is there a reason why this happened? I was expecting and wanting > 4.5-STABLE. Is there a place where all the current release cvs tags are defined? I've looked a few times and it's not immediately obvious how to pick a tag to get what you really want... Dean To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 10:46:58 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from peitho.fxp.org (peitho.fxp.org [209.26.95.40]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D619237B400 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 10:46:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by peitho.fxp.org (Postfix, from userid 1501) id 23FE413677; Tue, 7 May 2002 13:46:46 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 13:46:46 -0400 From: Chris Faulhaber To: John Von Essen Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Stable supfile Message-ID: <20020507174646.GA37902@peitho.fxp.org> Mail-Followup-To: Chris Faulhaber , John Von Essen , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0F1p//8PRICkK4MW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 01:43:04PM -0400, John Von Essen wrote: > Yesterday I wanted to cvsup to stable and make world. >=20 > In my supfile is "RELENG_4" >=20 > After cvsup and make world, uname returns: >=20 > FreeBSD hostname 4.6-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 4.6-PRERELEASE #0: Tue May 7=20 > 12:35:49 EDT 2002 >=20 > Is there a reason why this happened? I was expecting and wanting=20 > 4.5-STABLE. >=20 http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/admin.html#RELEASE-CAN= DIDATE --=20 Chris D. Faulhaber - jedgar@fxp.org - jedgar@FreeBSD.org -------------------------------------------------------- FreeBSD: The Power To Serve - http://www.FreeBSD.org --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) Comment: FreeBSD: The Power To Serve iD8DBQE82BMGObaG4P6BelARAp2gAJ0fNub1OCQX+LXlIaSMgCTZak1DvwCgjX7J CYnbUNRIw6Ld5oL2LqnkTQ8= =sT1H -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0F1p//8PRICkK4MW-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 10:47:55 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from laptop.tenebras.com (laptop.tenebras.com [66.92.188.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9CAD937B400 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 10:47:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 39741 invoked from network); 7 May 2002 17:47:47 -0000 Received: from sapphire.tenebras.com (HELO tenebras.com) (66.92.188.241) by 0 with SMTP; 7 May 2002 17:47:47 -0000 Message-ID: <3CD81342.6090009@tenebras.com> Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 10:47:46 -0700 From: Michael Sierchio Reply-To: kudzu@tenebras.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.0rc1) Gecko/20020427 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "R. David Murray" Cc: Ian , Erich Zigler , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Unable to alias IP's in 4.5 References: <20020507133834.I31920-100000@twirl.bitdance.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG R. David Murray wrote: > On Mon, 6 May 2002, Ian wrote: > >>What changed is that the code now enforces that you do it the right way, >>which is to use 255.255.255.255 as the netmask for the alias IPs. That is, >>use the normal/proper netmask for the primary IP for that NIC, then use >>255.255.255.255 for any alias IPs on the same subnet for that NIC. > > > That's rather counter-intuitive. Is that behavior mandated by > some standard or other? Some things appear counter-intuitive due to poor design, while others do because we're ignorant ;-) There are possible side effects to IP aliases in routing tables and arp handling -- using a netmask of 0xffffffff was always the proper approach, and now it is enforced. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 10:49: 7 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from peitho.fxp.org (peitho.fxp.org [209.26.95.40]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82C7837B403 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 10:49:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by peitho.fxp.org (Postfix, from userid 1501) id EE7D413669; Tue, 7 May 2002 13:48:59 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 13:48:59 -0400 From: Chris Faulhaber To: Dean Cookson Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Stable supfile Message-ID: <20020507174859.GB37902@peitho.fxp.org> Mail-Followup-To: Chris Faulhaber , Dean Cookson , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200205071745.g47Hjiq11678@geeky.nedod.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200205071745.g47Hjiq11678@geeky.nedod.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 01:45:44PM -0400, Dean Cookson wrote: > > Yesterday I wanted to cvsup to stable and make world. > >=20 > > In my supfile is "RELENG_4" > >=20 > > After cvsup and make world, uname returns: > >=20 > > FreeBSD hostname 4.6-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 4.6-PRERELEASE #0: Tue May 7= =20 > > 12:35:49 EDT 2002 > >=20 > > Is there a reason why this happened? I was expecting and wanting=20 > > 4.5-STABLE. >=20 > Is there a place where all the current release cvs tags are defined? > I've looked a few times and it's not immediately obvious how to pick > a tag to get what you really want... >=20 http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html --=20 Chris D. Faulhaber - jedgar@fxp.org - jedgar@FreeBSD.org -------------------------------------------------------- FreeBSD: The Power To Serve - http://www.FreeBSD.org --qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) Comment: FreeBSD: The Power To Serve iD8DBQE82BOLObaG4P6BelARAp4wAJ91DdnSE/qQya1hkuHJV6Qhqfsa2ACffQ0p trRdug6zkTvKhXD9htgZWyE= =wuAZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qlTNgmc+xy1dBmNv-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 10:49:59 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B67C37B40A for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 10:49:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (marck@localhost) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g47Hncb52843; Tue, 7 May 2002 21:49:38 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 21:49:38 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Dean Cookson Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Stable supfile In-Reply-To: <200205071745.g47Hjiq11678@geeky.nedod.org> Message-ID: <20020507214749.V43118-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 7 May 2002, Dean Cookson wrote: DC> > In my supfile is "RELENG_4" DC> > DC> > After cvsup and make world, uname returns: DC> > DC> > FreeBSD hostname 4.6-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 4.6-PRERELEASE #0: Tue May 7 DC> > 12:35:49 EDT 2002 DC> > DC> > Is there a reason why this happened? I was expecting and wanting DC> > 4.5-STABLE. DC> DC> Is there a place where all the current release cvs tags are defined? DC> I've looked a few times and it's not immediately obvious how to pick DC> a tag to get what you really want... /usr/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh I suppose ;-) or, as CVS log, at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/conf/newvers.sh Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 10:52: 3 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from geeky.nedod.org (ns1.nedod.org [66.92.68.61]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5231737B403 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 10:51:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: from geeky.nedod.org (localhost.nedod.org [127.0.0.1]) by geeky.nedod.org (8.11.5/8.11.5) with ESMTP id g47Hpnq11809; Tue, 7 May 2002 13:51:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from cookson@geeky.nedod.org) Message-Id: <200205071751.g47Hpnq11809@geeky.nedod.org> To: Chris Faulhaber Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Stable supfile In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 07 May 2002 13:48:59 EDT." <20020507174859.GB37902@peitho.fxp.org> Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 13:51:48 -0400 From: Dean Cookson Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html > I've looked for that like 5 different times. I must be blind. Thanks, Dean To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 11:12:14 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from verdi.nethelp.no (verdi.nethelp.no [194.19.15.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A07B037B404 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 11:12:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 97220 invoked by uid 1001); 7 May 2002 18:11:57 +0000 (GMT) To: kudzu@tenebras.com Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Unable to alias IP's in 4.5 From: sthaug@nethelp.no In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 07 May 2002 10:47:46 -0700" References: <3CD81342.6090009@tenebras.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 1.05+ on Emacs 19.34.2 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 20:11:57 +0200 Message-ID: <97218.1020795117@verdi.nethelp.no> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > >>What changed is that the code now enforces that you do it the right way, > >>which is to use 255.255.255.255 as the netmask for the alias IPs. That is, > >>use the normal/proper netmask for the primary IP for that NIC, then use > >>255.255.255.255 for any alias IPs on the same subnet for that NIC. > > > > > > That's rather counter-intuitive. Is that behavior mandated by > > some standard or other? > > Some things appear counter-intuitive due to poor design, while others do > because we're ignorant ;-) > > There are possible side effects to IP aliases in routing tables > and arp handling -- using a netmask of 0xffffffff was always > the proper approach, and now it is enforced. It should be noted that there is no law of nature which says it has to be done this way. I've been using Cisco routers and FreeBSD for many years, and the Cisco behavior (a secondary address on the same segment as the primary IP address uses the same netmask also) has always seemed more natural/less confusing. Steinar Haug, Nethelp consulting, sthaug@nethelp.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 11:13:50 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from root.com (nexus.root.com [209.102.106.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9016F37B400 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 11:13:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from dg@localhost) by root.com (8.11.2/8.11.2) id g47ICuL46681; Tue, 7 May 2002 11:12:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dg) Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 11:12:56 -0700 From: David Greenman-Lawrence To: Paul Dlug Cc: remy@boostworks.com, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: fxp0: SCB timeout Message-ID: <20020507111256.G39118@nexus.root.com> References: <200205070916.g479GKs06066@luxren2.boostworks.com> <200205070909.59285.paul@nerdlabs.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200205070909.59285.paul@nerdlabs.com>; from paul@nerdlabs.com on Tue, May 07, 2002 at 09:09:59AM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > >> The machine is an Intel SCB2 (SMP, ServerWorks HE-SL based) with a 64 >> Bits/66Mhz PCI NIC using a 21154BC transparent PCI bridge and two 82559 >> A0 revision chips. > >Thanks for all the info. It looks like this host is a 82555, I can't seem to >get the PCI bridge revision out of dmesg. Searching around it looks like >Intel has discontinued the 82555. The 82555 is a PHY, not a NIC chip, so you're looking at the wrong chip. -DG David Greenman-Lawrence Co-founder, The FreeBSD Project - http://www.freebsd.org President, TeraSolutions, Inc. - http://www.terasolutions.com President, Download Technologies, Inc. - http://www.downloadtech.com Pave the road of life with opportunities. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 12: 6:17 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from marlborough.cnchost.com (marlborough.concentric.net [207.155.248.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15C9837B419 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 12:06:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bitblocks.com (adsl-209-204-185-216.sonic.net [209.204.185.216]) by marlborough.cnchost.com id PAA02068; Tue, 7 May 2002 15:05:52 -0400 (EDT) [ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.14] Message-ID: <200205071905.PAA02068@marlborough.cnchost.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: Peter Wemm Subject: tic/tconv & friends Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 12:05:51 -0700 From: Bakul Shah Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I didn't notice tic & tconv are broken due to working old copies on my machine until someone on the Octree mailing list complained [Octree is a neat 3D CAD package which runs in Linux emulation mode -- unfortunately available in binary only]. I noticed Peter Wemm killed src/lib/libtmyinfo quite a while ago. The log message says Ensure libmytinfo stays dead.. I originally left it here so that we might be able to build the old shared versions rather than taking a binary for the compat area, but that seems to have caused confusion. For now I will just send this guy a previously compiled xterm.terminfo but my question is, is libmytinfo going to remain dead? If so, how does one run programs that want terminfo under FreeBSD? If terminfo is going to remain broken, may be the related man pages should be removed. Thanks! -- bakul To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 14: 9:14 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wemm.org (12-232-135-171.client.attbi.com [12.232.135.171]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2883937B405 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 14:09:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from overcee.wemm.org (overcee.wemm.org [10.0.0.3]) by fw.wemm.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g47L94429718 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 14:09:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) Received: from wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by overcee.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B15A138CC; Tue, 7 May 2002 14:09:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Bakul Shah Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: tic/tconv & friends In-Reply-To: <200205071905.PAA02068@marlborough.cnchost.com> Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 14:09:04 -0700 From: Peter Wemm Message-Id: <20020507210904.B15A138CC@overcee.wemm.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Bakul Shah wrote: > I didn't notice tic & tconv are broken due to working old > copies on my machine until someone on the Octree mailing list > complained [Octree is a neat 3D CAD package which runs in > Linux emulation mode -- unfortunately available in binary > only]. > > I noticed Peter Wemm killed src/lib/libtmyinfo quite a while > ago. The log message says > > Ensure libmytinfo stays dead.. I originally left it here so that we might > be able to build the old shared versions rather than taking a binary for > the compat area, but that seems to have caused confusion. > > For now I will just send this guy a previously compiled > xterm.terminfo but my question is, is libmytinfo going to > remain dead? If so, how does one run programs that want > terminfo under FreeBSD? If terminfo is going to remain > broken, may be the related man pages should be removed. Our native curses library supports both terminfo and termcap, so there is not need to bring libmytinfo back. The Linux binary will not care what libraries FreeBSD uses, but as you point out, we do not actually ship tic and infocmp and friends. There is a ncurses port/package that does have tic/infocmp etc. The compiled format is the same for them all. We can probably build tic/infocmp on FreeBSD as well if there's demand for it. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 14:27:54 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from resnet.uoregon.edu (resnet.uoregon.edu [128.223.122.47]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13B7737B408 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 14:27:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dwhite@localhost) by resnet.uoregon.edu (8.11.3/8.10.1) with ESMTP id g47LRFf95335; Tue, 7 May 2002 14:27:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 14:27:14 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White To: remy@boostworks.com Cc: paul@nerdlabs.com, , , Subject: Re: fxp0: SCB timeout In-Reply-To: <200205070916.g479GKs06066@luxren2.boostworks.com> Message-ID: <20020507142539.N90778-100000@resnet.uoregon.edu> X-All-Your-Base: are belong to us MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 7 May 2002 remy@boostworks.com wrote: > On 6 May, Paul Dlug wrote: > > > > If the general consensus is that adding a PCI NIC and disabling the > > onboard will fix it, I'll go that route. But I'd rather try to > > understand what the actual problem is and hopefully get a fix for it. > > Does anyone have suggestions for further debugging? > > > > I spent around a week, a month ago, trying to understand the problem. If > it may help, here is the tale: > > The machine is an Intel SCB2 (SMP, ServerWorks HE-SL based) with a 64 > Bits/66Mhz PCI NIC using a 21154BC transparent PCI bridge and two 82559 > A0 revision chips. Funny you mention the SCB2. The BMC hooks the NIC looking for management packets on this board (and other IPMI-equipped motherboards). I've gotten large numbers of SCB timeouts when communicating with the BMC this way. So it might just be the NIC is being grabbed for another purpose and the driver is sensitive to this. Note I have not seen any performance degredation as a result, although I haven't done large amounts of testing. Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | www.FreeBSD.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 14:53:53 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from dastardly.newsbastards.org.72.27.172.IN-addr.ARPA.NetScum.dyndns.dk (dclient217-162-215-44.hispeed.ch [217.162.215.44]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E11E137B40B for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 14:53:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from beerswilling.netscum.dyndns.dk (dcf77-zeit.netscum.dyndns.dk [172.27.72.27] (may be forged)) by dastardly.newsbastards.org.72.27.172.IN-addr.ARPA.NetScum.dyndns.dk (8.11.6/8.11.6-SPAMMERS-DeLiGHt) with ESMTP id g47LrcB00355 (using TLSv1/SSLv3 with cipher EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA (168 bits) verified FAIL); Tue, 7 May 2002 23:53:40 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from bounce@dcf77-zeit.netscum.dyndns.dk) Received: (from root@localhost) by beerswilling.netscum.dyndns.dk (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g47LrcG00354; Tue, 7 May 2002 23:53:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from bounce@dcf77-zeit.netscum.dyndns.dk) Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 23:53:38 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200205072153.g47LrcG00354@beerswilling.netscum.dyndns.dk> From: BOUWSMA Beery Organization: Men not wearing any pants that dont shave To: Attila Nagy Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nwfs + ftpd References: <200205041944.g44Jiki00425@beerswilling.netscum.dyndns.dk> X-Hacked: via telnet to your port 25, what else? X-Internet-Access-Provided-By: Mountain Informatik AG X-NetScum: Yes X-One-And-Only-Real-True-Fluffy: No Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [replies sent directly to me the next several days will probably timeout and bounce, sorry...] Servus! You wrote: > > filesystems, but is no longer, while it is still a unionfs-mounted-fs > > problem, as I've observed. I haven't checked though... > At least in -stable. > > least, until the unionfs sendfile() access is fixed to work...) > One of the FreeBSD developers said that this is already fixed in -current, > but backporting isn't so straightforward. > If you can try this out, please let me know. Okay, I did and it worked, with -current. Both the sendfile-httpd (binary from -stable) and the -current native ftpd delivered a fine unblemished mp3 of several minutes, from a couple union mounts. (This is a non-current -current, vintage march or so, but I wouldn't expect it to have been gratuitously b0rkened over the last two months) barry bouwsma To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 15:11:21 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailout07.sul.t-online.com (mailout07.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.83]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57FB037B400 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 15:11:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fwd07.sul.t-online.de by mailout07.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 175DAx-0004PB-05; Wed, 08 May 2002 00:11:15 +0200 Received: from pc5.abc (520067998749-0001@[217.233.99.169]) by fmrl07.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 175DAu-1dhLRgC; Wed, 8 May 2002 00:11:12 +0200 Received: (from nicolas@localhost) by pc5.abc (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g47MBBA01188 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 8 May 2002 00:11:11 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from list@rachinsky.de) Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 00:11:10 +0200 From: Nicolas Rachinsky To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: tic/tconv & friends Message-ID: <20020507221110.GA1001@pc5.abc> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <200205071905.PAA02068@marlborough.cnchost.com> <20020507210904.B15A138CC@overcee.wemm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020507210904.B15A138CC@overcee.wemm.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Powered-by: FreeBSD X-Homepage: http://www.rachinsky.de X-PGP-Keyid: C11ABC0E X-PGP-Fingerprint: 19DB 8392 8FE0 814A 7362 EEBD A53B 526A C11A BC0E X-PGP-Key: http://www.rachinsky.de/nicolas/nicolas_rachinsky.asc X-Sender: 520067998749-0001@t-dialin.net Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Peter Wemm [2002-05-07 14:09:04 -0700]: > We can probably build tic/infocmp on FreeBSD as well if there's demand for > it. A knob in make.conf would be nice. Nicolas To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 15:29: 1 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailhost.firstcallgroup.co.uk (dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk [194.200.93.142]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6874D37B405 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 15:28:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pfrench by mailhost.firstcallgroup.co.uk with local (Exim 3.34 #1) id 175DRy-0001H0-00 for stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Tue, 07 May 2002 23:28:50 +0100 To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Experiences with XFree86-4 on 4.6-PRERELEASE Message-Id: From: Pete French Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 23:28:50 +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG As I request was made tthat people try this before the release I thought I would give it a shot. So far the experience has been mixed. It installed O.K. using the packages, though configuring it proved to be less easy than anticipated. kepping the old config file to hand and and fiddling with the parameters in the new file until they match proved to be very necessary. But it seems to be up and running. 2 questions remaining: 1) How is it possible to make this work with moused ? I found on two separate machines that I had to disable moused and tell X to expect a PS/2 mouse on /dev/psm0. I am assuming there is some setting by which I can tell it to use /dev/mouse, but I cant work out what it is for the life of me. 2) Netscape does not seem to work properly at all. It renders pages with fragments of them being white wityh thin vertical yellow bars. This is a serious problem for me as it makes the machine virtualy unusable for browsing the internet. Has anyone else seen this effect at all, and is there any fix for it. I would do a net search, but as the browser isnt working thats not really practical! I am using the Matrox Millenium II drivers on an 8MB card. cheers, -pcf. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 15:33:35 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from lindt.urgle.com (lindt.urgle.com [62.49.202.23]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA27437B404 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 15:33:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mike by lindt.urgle.com with local (Exim 3.33 #1) id 175DWF-0007gr-00; Tue, 07 May 2002 22:33:15 +0000 Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 23:33:15 +0100 From: Mike Bristow To: Lucky Green Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xterm and colour (Was: cvs commit: ports/mail/mutt-devel...) Message-ID: <20020507233314.A29484@lindt.urgle.com> References: <002301c1f3ff$8c52a100$c33a080a@LUCKYVAIO> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <002301c1f3ff$8c52a100$c33a080a@LUCKYVAIO>; from shamrock@cypherpunks.to on Sat, May 04, 2002 at 11:38:59PM -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 11:38:59PM -0700, Lucky Green wrote: > [Quotes from various folks about FreeBSD's "xterm" not supporting color > elided]. Actually, I think that TERM is broken. What you actually want is a list of termcap/terminfo entries that would work in a preference order. So, instead of saying: TERM=xterm-xfree86 or TERM=xterm-solaris or whathaveyou, you could say: TERMS=xterm-freebsd;xterm-xfree86;xterm-color;xterm;vt100 and have whatever machine you connected to use the first entry in the list that it knows about. Of course, you'd want to have a sensible fallback for situations where the remote machine doesn't have this wonderful scheme, so you'd have to set TERM=xterm (or TERM=vt100 when everyone uses a curses which does this and every remote access application passes it on) as a fallback. This is so obvious to me, that I'm sure that everyone has thought of it and I'm missing some obvious flaw. Please tell me what it is, or I'll go bug the ncurses maintainer(s) and see if they'll accept patches for it. Then all I'll have to do is worry about the applications ;-) -- You can't do maths without e -- David Walters To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 15:38:18 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 970D337B4BC for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 15:37:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id g47MbL532743; Tue, 7 May 2002 15:37:21 -0700 Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 15:37:21 -0700 From: Brooks Davis To: Pete French Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Experiences with XFree86-4 on 4.6-PRERELEASE Message-ID: <20020507153721.A20305@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from pfrench@firstcallgroup.co.uk on Tue, May 07, 2002 at 11:28:50PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 11:28:50PM +0100, Pete French wrote: > As I request was made tthat people try this before the > release I thought I would give it a shot. So far the > experience has been mixed. It installed O.K. using the > packages, though configuring it proved to be less > easy than anticipated. kepping the old config file to hand and=20 > and fiddling with the parameters in the new file until they match > proved to be very necessary. But it seems to be up and running. >=20 > 2 questions remaining: >=20 > 1) How is it possible to make this work with moused ? I found on > two separate machines that I had to disable moused and tell > X to expect a PS/2 mouse on /dev/psm0. I am assuming there is > some setting by which I can tell it to use /dev/mouse, but I cant > work out what it is for the life of me. There is no /dev/mouse. This entry works for me in current: Section "InputDevice" Identifier "InternalMouse" Driver "mouse" Option "Protocol" "auto" Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" EndSection > 2) Netscape does not seem to work properly at all. It renders pages > with fragments of them being white wityh thin vertical yellow > bars. This is a serious problem for me as it makes the machine > virtualy unusable for browsing the internet. Has anyone else seen this > effect at all, and is there any fix for it. I would do a net search, = but > as the browser isnt working thats not really practical! Have you tried a browser who's development is a bit less dead? :-) Konqueror and Mozilla are working pretty well here. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE82FcgXY6L6fI4GtQRAsiLAJ41Q5cPRLXojWtch0Ko123ZlEuwDwCguZXZ EDJIjA6vAeEln3Nxza+l9os= =jWfV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1yeeQ81UyVL57Vl7-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 15:46:59 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-43.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.43]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7412637B401 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 15:46:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E754F66DC8; Tue, 7 May 2002 15:46:52 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 15:46:52 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway To: Pete French Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Experiences with XFree86-4 on 4.6-PRERELEASE Message-ID: <20020507154652.A57358@xor.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from pfrench@firstcallgroup.co.uk on Tue, May 07, 2002 at 11:28:50PM +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 11:28:50PM +0100, Pete French wrote: > 2) Netscape does not seem to work properly at all. It renders pages > with fragments of them being white wityh thin vertical yellow > bars. This is a serious problem for me as it makes the machine > virtualy unusable for browsing the internet. Has anyone else seen this > effect at all, and is there any fix for it. I would do a net search, = but > as the browser isnt working thats not really practical! >=20 > I am using the Matrox Millenium II drivers on an 8MB card. Sounds like a driver problem. There are other (text-mode) browsers you can use to investigate this (w3m, links, lynx, etc). Kris --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE82FlcWry0BWjoQKURArFMAKDOAFQH1zzE7ojKWW/TlHJIqCoTdQCg6M7h CUJc6z0YpdrGLWRodd2y0Js= =KOYT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 15:55:38 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from tonnant.cnchost.com (tonnant.concentric.net [207.155.248.72]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA8B937B404 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 15:55:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bitblocks.com (adsl-209-204-185-216.sonic.net [209.204.185.216]) by tonnant.cnchost.com id SAA26897; Tue, 7 May 2002 18:55:30 -0400 (EDT) [ConcentricHost SMTP Relay 1.14] Message-ID: <200205072255.SAA26897@tonnant.cnchost.com> To: Peter Wemm Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: tic/tconv & friends In-reply-to: Your message of "Tue, 07 May 2002 14:09:04 PDT." <20020507210904.B15A138CC@overcee.wemm.org> Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 15:55:30 -0700 From: Bakul Shah Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > The Linux binary will not care what libraries FreeBSD uses, but as you > point out, we do not actually ship tic and infocmp and friends. There is a > ncurses port/package that does have tic/infocmp etc. The compiled format > is the same for them all. That is good enough. > We can probably build tic/infocmp on FreeBSD as well if there's demand for > it. I don't care how we get it as long as there is a way. But as I mentioned, the man pages should be fixed up. Thanks for your response! -- bakul To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 17: 1:33 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (leviathan.inethouston.net [66.64.12.249]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E839837B400 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 17:01:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 75ECB31A133; Tue, 7 May 2002 19:01:28 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 19:01:28 -0500 From: "David W. Chapman Jr." To: Kris Kennaway Cc: Pete French , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Experiences with XFree86-4 on 4.6-PRERELEASE Message-ID: <20020508000128.GC35394@leviathan.inethouston.net> Reply-To: "David W. Chapman Jr." Mail-Followup-To: Kris Kennaway , Pete French , stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20020507154652.A57358@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020507154652.A57358@xor.obsecurity.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 03:46:52PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 11:28:50PM +0100, Pete French wrote: > > > 2) Netscape does not seem to work properly at all. It renders pages > > with fragments of them being white wityh thin vertical yellow > > bars. This is a serious problem for me as it makes the machine > > virtualy unusable for browsing the internet. Has anyone else seen this > > effect at all, and is there any fix for it. I would do a net search, but > > as the browser isnt working thats not really practical! > > > > I am using the Matrox Millenium II drivers on an 8MB card. > > Sounds like a driver problem. There are other (text-mode) browsers > you can use to investigate this (w3m, links, lynx, etc). > I believe when you install XFree it displays a banner that says the MGA drivers are experimental, but I don't know if that driver covers your card. -- David W. Chapman Jr. dwcjr@inethouston.net Raintree Network Services, Inc. dwcjr@freebsd.org FreeBSD Committer To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 17:36: 5 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rwcrmhc53.attbi.com (rwcrmhc53.attbi.com [204.127.198.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA4737B404; Tue, 7 May 2002 17:35:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gateway.posi.net ([12.236.90.177]) by rwcrmhc53.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020508003542.MOOY7420.rwcrmhc53.attbi.com@gateway.posi.net>; Wed, 8 May 2002 00:35:42 +0000 Received: from localhost (kbyanc@localhost) by gateway.posi.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g480ZZW28425; Tue, 7 May 2002 17:35:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kbyanc@posi.net) X-Authentication-Warning: gateway.posi.net: kbyanc owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 17:35:34 -0700 (PDT) From: Kelly Yancey To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: freebsd-tokenring@freebsd.org, Subject: Call for testers Message-ID: <20020507171815.H28397-200000@gateway.posi.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-1423277081-1020818134=:28397" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info. --0-1423277081-1020818134=:28397 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII I am looking for testers for the attached patch in hopes of MFC'ing this bug-fix from -current to -stable in time for 4.6-RELEASE. The bug being addressed is that interface's with names longer than 6 characters often overflow the sockaddr_dl data structure's buffer for holding them (specifically, 7 or more characters for the interface name plus the 6 bytes for ethernet or token ring hardware addresses exceeds the 12 byte sdl_data field that is to hold them). The manifestation of this bug is that the iso 802.5 source routing control field is overwritten with part of the interface's hardware address (and vice-a-versa). The fix committed to -current is the same as that in the attached patch. Both give the storage previously reserved for 802.5 source routing information to the sdl_data field so it may be used to hold longer interface names or hardware addresses. In the case of token-ring, source routing information is stored in the sdl_data field now, but at the same offset as it used to be in the structure, so there is effectively no change. So the overall effect is that token-ring interface names still may not exceed 6 characters in length. However, for all other interfaces, there is plenty of room allotted for the interface name and hardware address (46 bytes now as compared to 12) thereby averting the overflow. In addition, since the structure offsets did not change nor did the size of the sockaddr_dl structure itself, I believe there should be no imcompatibility with binary-only network drivers. However, I do not have access to any token-ring hardware so I cannot be 100% sure that I didn't break 802.5 source routing on such devices. Therefor, I would be most grateful if anyone with token ring hardware could please apply the attached patches and report any successes for failures. Thanks, Kelly --0-1423277081-1020818134=:28397 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; name="sdl_data-overflow4.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 Content-ID: <20020507173534.P28397@gateway.posi.net> Content-Description: Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="sdl_data-overflow4.diff" SW5kZXg6IG5ldC9pZl9kbC5oDQo9PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09DQpS Q1MgZmlsZTogL2hvbWUvY3ZzL2Fjcy9iYXNlL3NyYy9zeXMvbmV0L2lmX2Rs Lmgsdg0KcmV0cmlldmluZyByZXZpc2lvbiAxLjEuMS4xDQpkaWZmIC11IC1y MS4xLjEuMSBpZl9kbC5oDQotLS0gbmV0L2lmX2RsLmgJMjIgTWFyIDIwMDIg MDQ6MTE6MDAgLTAwMDAJMS4xLjEuMQ0KKysrIG5ldC9pZl9kbC5oCTMwIEFw ciAyMDAyIDIwOjE0OjA5IC0wMDAwDQpAQCAtNjYsMTAgKzY2LDggQEANCiAJ dV9jaGFyCXNkbF9ubGVuOwkvKiBpbnRlcmZhY2UgbmFtZSBsZW5ndGgsIG5v IHRyYWlsaW5nIDAgcmVxZC4gKi8NCiAJdV9jaGFyCXNkbF9hbGVuOwkvKiBs aW5rIGxldmVsIGFkZHJlc3MgbGVuZ3RoICovDQogCXVfY2hhcglzZGxfc2xl bjsJLyogbGluayBsYXllciBzZWxlY3RvciBsZW5ndGggKi8NCi0JY2hhcglz ZGxfZGF0YVsxMl07CS8qIG1pbmltdW0gd29yayBhcmVhLCBjYW4gYmUgbGFy Z2VyOw0KKwljaGFyCXNkbF9kYXRhWzQ2XTsJLyogbWluaW11bSB3b3JrIGFy ZWEsIGNhbiBiZSBsYXJnZXI7DQogCQkJCSAgIGNvbnRhaW5zIGJvdGggaWYg bmFtZSBhbmQgbGwgYWRkcmVzcyAqLw0KLQl1X3Nob3J0CXNkbF9yY2Y7CS8q IHNvdXJjZSByb3V0aW5nIGNvbnRyb2wgKi8NCi0JdV9zaG9ydAlzZGxfcm91 dGVbMTZdOwkvKiBzb3VyY2Ugcm91dGluZyBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbiAqLw0KIH07 DQogDQogI2RlZmluZSBMTEFERFIocykgKChjYWRkcl90KSgocyktPnNkbF9k YXRhICsgKHMpLT5zZGxfbmxlbikpDQpJbmRleDogbmV0L2lmX2lzbzg4MDI1 c3Vici5jDQo9PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09DQpSQ1MgZmlsZTogL2hv bWUvY3ZzL2Fjcy9iYXNlL3NyYy9zeXMvbmV0L2lmX2lzbzg4MDI1c3Vici5j LHYNCnJldHJpZXZpbmcgcmV2aXNpb24gMS4xLjEuMQ0KZGlmZiAtdSAtcjEu MS4xLjEgaWZfaXNvODgwMjVzdWJyLmMNCi0tLSBuZXQvaWZfaXNvODgwMjVz dWJyLmMJMjIgTWFyIDIwMDIgMDQ6MTE6MDAgLTAwMDAJMS4xLjEuMQ0KKysr IG5ldC9pZl9pc284ODAyNXN1YnIuYwkzMCBBcHIgMjAwMiAyMToyNzoxMiAt MDAwMA0KQEAgLTIwMiw4ICsyMDIsOCBAQA0KIA0KIAkvKiBDYWxjdWxhdGUg cm91dGluZyBpbmZvIGxlbmd0aCBiYXNlZCBvbiBhcnAgdGFibGUgZW50cnkg Ki8NCiAJaWYgKHJ0ICYmIChzZGwgPSAoc3RydWN0IHNvY2thZGRyX2RsICop cnQtPnJ0X2dhdGV3YXkpKQ0KLQkJaWYgKHNkbC0+c2RsX3JjZiAhPSBOVUxM KQ0KLQkJCXJpZl9sZW4gPSBUUl9SQ0ZfUklGTEVOKHNkbC0+c2RsX3JjZik7 DQorCQlpZiAoU0RMX0lTTzg4MDI1KHNkbCktPnRybGRfcmNmICE9IE5VTEwp DQorCQkJcmlmX2xlbiA9IFRSX1JDRl9SSUZMRU4oU0RMX0lTTzg4MDI1KHNk bCktPnRybGRfcmNmKTsNCiANCiAJLyogR2VuZXJhdGUgYSBnZW5lcmljIDgw Mi41IGhlYWRlciBmb3IgdGhlIHBhY2tldCAqLw0KIAlnZW5fdGguYWMgPSBU Ul9BQzsNCkBAIC0yMTIsOCArMjEyLDkgQEANCiAJaWYgKHJpZl9sZW4pIHsN CiAJCWdlbl90aC5pc284ODAyNV9zaG9zdFswXSB8PSBUUl9SSUk7DQogCQlp ZiAocmlmX2xlbiA+IDIpIHsNCi0JCQlnZW5fdGgucmNmID0gc2RsLT5zZGxf cmNmOw0KLQkJCW1lbWNweShnZW5fdGgucmQsIHNkbC0+c2RsX3JvdXRlLCBy aWZfbGVuIC0gMik7DQorCQkJZ2VuX3RoLnJjZiA9IFNETF9JU084ODAyNShz ZGwpLT50cmxkX3JjZjsNCisJCQltZW1jcHkoZ2VuX3RoLnJkLCBTRExfSVNP ODgwMjUoc2RsKS0+dHJsZF9yb3V0ZSwNCisJCQkgICAgICAgcmlmX2xlbiAt IDIpOw0KIAkJfQ0KIAl9DQogCQ0KSW5kZXg6IG5ldC9pc284ODAyNS5oDQo9 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09DQpSQ1MgZmlsZTogL2hvbWUvY3ZzL2Fj cy9iYXNlL3NyYy9zeXMvbmV0L2lzbzg4MDI1Lmgsdg0KcmV0cmlldmluZyBy ZXZpc2lvbiAxLjEuMS4xDQpkaWZmIC11IC1yMS4xLjEuMSBpc284ODAyNS5o DQotLS0gbmV0L2lzbzg4MDI1LmgJMjIgTWFyIDIwMDIgMDQ6MTE6MDAgLTAw MDAJMS4xLjEuMQ0KKysrIG5ldC9pc284ODAyNS5oCTMwIEFwciAyMDAyIDIx OjI3OjA1IC0wMDAwDQpAQCAtMTAyLDYgKzEwMiwxNSBAQA0KIAl1X2NoYXIg ZmM7DQogfTsNCiANCitzdHJ1Y3QgaXNvODgwMjVfc29ja2FkZHJfZGxfZGF0 YSB7DQorCXVfc2hvcnQJIHRybGRfcmNmOw0KKwl1X3Nob3J0CSp0cmxkX3Jv dXRlW1JJRl9NQVhfTEVOXTsNCit9Ow0KKw0KKyNkZWZpbmUgU0RMX0lTTzg4 MDI1KHMpCQkoKHN0cnVjdCBpc284ODAyNV9zb2NrYWRkcl9kbF9kYXRhICop CVwNCisJCQkJICgocyktPnNkbF9kYXRhICsgbWluKChzKS0+c2RsX25sZW4g KwlcDQorCQkJCSAgKHMpLT5zZGxfYWxlbiArIChzKS0+c2RsX3NsZW4sIDEy KSkpDQorDQogLyoNCiAgKiBTdHJ1Y3R1cmUgb2YgYSA0OC1iaXQgaXNvIDgw Mi41IGFkZHJlc3MuDQogICogICggV2UgY291bGQgYWxzbyBhZGQgdGhlIDE2 IGJpdCBhZGRyZXNzZXMgYXMgYSB1bmlvbikNCkluZGV4OiBuZXRpbmV0L2lm X2V0aGVyLmMNCj09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09 PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT09PT0NClJDUyBmaWxlOiAv aG9tZS9jdnMvYWNzL2Jhc2Uvc3JjL3N5cy9uZXRpbmV0L2lmX2V0aGVyLmMs dg0KcmV0cmlldmluZyByZXZpc2lvbiAxLjUNCmRpZmYgLXUgLXIxLjUgaWZf ZXRoZXIuYw0KLS0tIG5ldGluZXQvaWZfZXRoZXIuYwkyOSBNYXIgMjAwMiAy MDozMzo1NyAtMDAwMAkxLjUNCisrKyBuZXRpbmV0L2lmX2V0aGVyLmMJMzAg QXByIDIwMDIgMjE6Mjc6MjMgLTAwMDANCkBAIC01MjksNiArNTI5LDcgQEAN CiAJcmVnaXN0ZXIgc3RydWN0IGFycGNvbSAqYWMgPSAoc3RydWN0IGFycGNv bSAqKW0tPm1fcGt0aGRyLnJjdmlmOw0KIAlzdHJ1Y3QgZXRoZXJfaGVhZGVy ICplaDsNCiAJc3RydWN0IGlzbzg4MDI1X2hlYWRlciAqdGggPSAoc3RydWN0 IGlzbzg4MDI1X2hlYWRlciAqKTA7DQorCXN0cnVjdCBpc284ODAyNV9zb2Nr YWRkcl9kbF9kYXRhICp0cmxkOw0KIAlyZWdpc3RlciBzdHJ1Y3QgbGxpbmZv X2FycCAqbGEgPSAwOw0KIAlyZWdpc3RlciBzdHJ1Y3QgcnRlbnRyeSAqcnQ7 DQogCXN0cnVjdCBpZmFkZHIgKmlmYTsNCkBAIC02NDcsNyArNjQ4LDYgQEAN CiB1cGRhdGU6DQogCQkodm9pZCltZW1jcHkoTExBRERSKHNkbCksIGVhLT5h cnBfc2hhLCBzaXplb2YoZWEtPmFycF9zaGEpKTsNCiAJCXNkbC0+c2RsX2Fs ZW4gPSBzaXplb2YoZWEtPmFycF9zaGEpOw0KLSAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICBz ZGwtPnNkbF9yY2YgPSAodV9zaG9ydCkwOw0KIAkJLyoNCiAJCSAqIElmIHdl IHJlY2VpdmUgYW4gYXJwIGZyb20gYSB0b2tlbi1yaW5nIHN0YXRpb24gb3Zl cg0KIAkJICogYSB0b2tlbi1yaW5nIG5pYyB0aGVuIHRyeSB0byBzYXZlIHRo ZSBzb3VyY2UNCkBAIC02NTUsMTMgKzY1NSwxNCBAQA0KIAkJICovDQogCQlp ZiAoYWMtPmFjX2lmLmlmX3R5cGUgPT0gSUZUX0lTTzg4MDI1KSB7DQogCQkJ dGggPSAoc3RydWN0IGlzbzg4MDI1X2hlYWRlciAqKW0tPm1fcGt0aGRyLmhl YWRlcjsNCisJCQl0cmxkID0gU0RMX0lTTzg4MDI1KHNkbCk7DQogCQkJcmlm X2xlbiA9IFRSX1JDRl9SSUZMRU4odGgtPnJjZik7DQogCQkJaWYgKCh0aC0+ aXNvODgwMjVfc2hvc3RbMF0gJiBUUl9SSUkpICYmDQogCQkJICAgIChyaWZf bGVuID4gMikpIHsNCi0JCQkJc2RsLT5zZGxfcmNmID0gdGgtPnJjZjsNCi0J CQkJc2RsLT5zZGxfcmNmIF49IGh0b25zKFRSX1JDRl9ESVIpOw0KLQkJCQlt ZW1jcHkoc2RsLT5zZGxfcm91dGUsIHRoLT5yZCwgcmlmX2xlbiAtIDIpOw0K LQkJCQlzZGwtPnNkbF9yY2YgJj0gfmh0b25zKFRSX1JDRl9CQ1NUX01BU0sp Ow0KKwkJCQl0cmxkLT50cmxkX3JjZiA9IHRoLT5yY2Y7DQorCQkJCXRybGQt PnRybGRfcmNmIF49IGh0b25zKFRSX1JDRl9ESVIpOw0KKwkJCQltZW1jcHko dHJsZC0+dHJsZF9yb3V0ZSwgdGgtPnJkLCByaWZfbGVuIC0gMik7DQorCQkJ CXRybGQtPnRybGRfcmNmICY9IH5odG9ucyhUUl9SQ0ZfQkNTVF9NQVNLKTsN CiAJCQkJLyoNCiAJCQkJICogU2V0IHVwIHNvdXJjZSByb3V0aW5nIGluZm9y bWF0aW9uIGZvcg0KIAkJCQkgKiByZXBseSBwYWNrZXQgKFhYWCkNCkBAIC02 NzUsOSArNjc2LDcgQEANCiAJCQltLT5tX2RhdGEgLT0gODsNCiAJCQltLT5t X2xlbiAgKz0gODsNCiAJCQltLT5tX3BrdGhkci5sZW4gKz0gODsNCi0JCQl0 aC0+cmNmID0gc2RsLT5zZGxfcmNmOw0KLQkJfSBlbHNlIHsNCi0JCQlzZGwt PnNkbF9yY2YgPSAodV9zaG9ydCkwOw0KKwkJCXRoLT5yY2YgPSB0cmxkLT50 cmxkX3JjZjsNCiAJCX0NCiAJCWlmIChydC0+cnRfZXhwaXJlKQ0KIAkJCXJ0 LT5ydF9leHBpcmUgPSB0aW1lX3NlY29uZCArIGFycHRfa2VlcDsNCg== --0-1423277081-1020818134=:28397-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 18:14:58 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from h1.generalresources.com (h1.generalresources.com [211.21.66.250]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F69137B403 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 18:14:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from root@localhost) by h1.generalresources.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g481EnN48935 for FreeBSD-stable@FreeBSD.ORG.procmail; Wed, 8 May 2002 09:14:49 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from hsw@acm.org) Received: from server.tucheng.generalresources.com (int-1-253.generalresources.com [192.168.1.253]) by h1.generalresources.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g481Eni48929; Wed, 8 May 2002 09:14:49 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from hsw@acm.org) Received: from x4.tucheng.generalresources.com (x4.tucheng.generalresources.com [192.168.2.4]) by server.tucheng.generalresources.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g481Em724208; Wed, 8 May 2002 09:14:49 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from hsw@acm.org) Received: from x4.tucheng.generalresources.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by x4.tucheng.generalresources.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g481EmQ5024846; Wed, 8 May 2002 09:14:48 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from hsw@acm.org) Message-Id: <200205080114.g481EmQ5024846@x4.tucheng.generalresources.com> To: Dennis Mathiasen Cc: FreeBSD-stable@FreeBSD.ORG From: Christopher Hall Reply-To: Christopher Hall Subject: Re: ata & mitsumi CD In-Reply-To: Message from Dennis Mathiasen of "Tue, 07 May 2002 12:09:53 -0400." <200205071609.g47G9rSL003024@ny-utica5a-435.aburny.adelphia.net> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD X-Mailer: Exmh Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 09:14:48 +0800 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <200205071609.g47G9rSL003024@ny-utica5a-435.aburny.adelphia.net>, Dennis Mathiasen writes: > >Running 4.6-PRERELEASE, I can mount a cd ok, but when I try to copy a file fro >m the cd I get: > >acd0: READ_BIG command timeout >ata1: resetting devices > >and then: > >Fatal trap 12 page fault while in kernel mode... >(etc.) >and then a re-boot. There have been several threads related to CD/DVD ROM problems and one pr: i386/37420. Each thread stopped after atacontrol was used to set the drive into dma mode, so I guess this worked for their case. However, since both pio and dma mode give the same error on my CDROM drives I reverted to 4.5-RELEASE-p3 and watch the mailing list to to see if anyone else has the problem and check cvsup to see if sys/dev/ata is modified before I try -stable again on those systems. 4.5-RELEASE-p4 does not have any changes to atapi-cd.c so I would expect that to work (I have not tested this yet). >I have tried reverting to the wd driver and included mcd in the kernel, >but mcd never shows up in dmesg output. How can I (or can I) cause the >use of this driver? I don't know about this, but I am fairly sure that mcd is only for a Mitsumi ISA interface card. >mcd is for Mitsumi drives which apparently use a non-conforming ATAPI >interface. However, until now it has worked. I'd sometimes get IO >timeout messages, but nothing worse. > >Thanks. > >Dennis Mathiasen >dennisma@adelphia.net > >To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org >with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > --- Christopher Hall Fax: +886-2-2795-3030 Christopher Hall Phone: +886-2-2795-5799 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 19:11:49 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from notus.primus.ca (mail.tor.primus.ca [216.254.136.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F11D37B413 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 19:11:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from dialin-140-21.hamilton.primus.ca ([209.90.140.21]) by notus.primus.ca with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #16) id 175GvX-0002MG-0A; Tue, 07 May 2002 22:11:35 -0400 Date: Tue, 7 May 2002 22:11:20 -0400 (EDT) From: Jason Hunt X-X-Sender: leth@lethargic.dyndns.org To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: Brooks Davis , Pete French Subject: Re: Experiences with XFree86-4 on 4.6-PRERELEASE In-Reply-To: <20020507153721.A20305@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> Message-ID: <20020507215114.H1649-100000@lethargic.dyndns.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 7 May 2002, Brooks Davis wrote: > > Have you tried a browser who's development is a bit less dead? :-) > Konqueror and Mozilla are working pretty well here. > > -- Brooks > This is off-topic and has nothing to do with XFree86, but using a different browser might not always be an option. Pete did not specify what version of Netscape he was using, however there are a lot of websites (especially from financial institutions) that do not work with "version 6" browsers (ie: galeon, konqueror, and anything else based off of mozilla). This makes older, less actively developed browsers (especially netscape4) around quite useful/necessary. My two cents. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 23:11:12 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from www.golsyd.net.au (golsyd.net.au [203.57.20.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B54D937B407; Tue, 7 May 2002 23:10:57 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [203.51.11.73] by www.quake.com.au (NTMail 4.30.0012/AB6169.63.5324aadf) with ESMTP id eygfaaaa for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 16:10:55 +1000 Message-ID: <3CD8C15B.8020201@quake.com.au> Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 16:10:35 +1000 From: Kal Torak Organization: Quake Networking User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020311 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions Cc: FreeBSD Stable Subject: XFree86-4-libraries wont build Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------020708030104070605030905" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------020708030104070605030905 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi... This seems to happen to me when ever I try and make something large from the ports, that part of it wont build!! Anyway trying to build XFree86-4 from the ports cvsup'd yesterday and it fails in the libraries part... Is the port broken or is it just me? Here is the output from make.. Thanks! --------------020708030104070605030905 Content-Type: text/plain; name="make-xlib.log" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="make-xlib.log" ===> Building for XFree86-libraries-4.2.0_1 Building Release 6.6 of the X Window System: XFree86-libraries-4.2.0 Wed May 8 01:22:08 EST 2002 cd ./config/imake && make -f Makefile.ini BOOTSTRAPCFLAGS="" CC="cc" clean rm -f ccimake imake.o imake rm -f *.CKP *.ln *.BAK *.bak *.o core errs ,* *~ *.a tags TAGS make.log \#* rm -f -r Makefile.proto Makefile Makefile.dep bootstrap make Makefile.boot cd ./config/imake && make -f Makefile.ini BOOTSTRAPCFLAGS="" CC="cc" making imake with BOOTSTRAPCFLAGS= in config/imake cc -o ccimake -O -I../../include -I../../imports/x11/include/X11 ccimake.c cc -c -O -I../../include -I../../imports/x11/include/X11 `./ccimake` imake.c cc -o imake -O -I../../include -I../../imports/x11/include/X11 imake.o rm -f ./config/makedepend/Makefile.proto ./config/imake/imake -I./config/cf -s ./config/makedepend/Makefile.proto -f ./config/makedepend/Imakefile -DTOPDIR=../.. -DCURDIR=./config/makedepend In file included from config/cf/site.def:58, from config/cf/Imake.tmpl:45, from Imakefile.c:13: config/cf/xf86site.def:631: warning: `InstallXdmConfig' redefined config/cf/host.def:5: warning: this is the location of the previous definition config/cf/xf86site.def:632: warning: `InstallXinitConfig' redefined config/cf/host.def:6: warning: this is the location of the previous definition config/cf/xf86site.def:633: warning: `InstallFSConfig' redefined config/cf/host.def:7: warning: this is the location of the previous definition In file included from config/cf/FreeBSD.cf:552, from config/cf/Imake.tmpl:94, from Imakefile.c:13: config/cf/xfree86.cf:14: version.def: No such file or directory In file included from config/cf/site.def:158, from config/cf/Imake.tmpl:100, from Imakefile.c:13: config/cf/host.def:5: warning: `InstallXdmConfig' redefined config/cf/xf86site.def:631: warning: this is the location of the previous defini tion config/cf/host.def:6: warning: `InstallXinitConfig' redefined config/cf/xf86site.def:632: warning: this is the location of the previous defini tion config/cf/host.def:7: warning: `InstallFSConfig' redefined config/cf/xf86site.def:637: warning: this is the location of the previous defini tion config/cf/host.def:10: warning: `BuildFontServer' redefined config/cf/xf86site.def:635: warning: this is the location of the previous defini tion ./config/imake/imake: Exit code 1. Stop. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/local/ports/usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-libraries/work/xc. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/local/ports/usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-libraries/work/xc. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-libraries. --------------020708030104070605030905-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 23:19:20 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63D6237B40B; Tue, 7 May 2002 23:19:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from owt.com (owt-207-41-94-232.owt.com [207.41.94.232]) by rutger.owt.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id XAA22918; Tue, 7 May 2002 23:18:58 -0700 Message-ID: <3CD8C351.6090308@owt.com> Date: Tue, 07 May 2002 23:18:57 -0700 From: Kent Stewart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020314 Netscape6/6.2.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us, es-mx MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kal Torak Cc: freebsd-questions , FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: XFree86-4-libraries wont build References: <3CD8C15B.8020201@quake.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Kal Torak wrote: > Hi... > > This seems to happen to me when ever I try and make something large > from the ports, that part of it wont build!! Anyway trying to build > XFree86-4 from the ports cvsup'd yesterday and it fails in the libraries > part... > > Is the port broken or is it just me? Since I just finished, I would say it is just you. I am building the servers right now. Make sure you have all of the XFree86 dependancies deleted and start from scratch. It also tells you to add the version 4 option to /etc/make.conf and I would do that before I start. Kent > > Here is the output from make.. > > Thanks! > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > ===> Building for XFree86-libraries-4.2.0_1 > > Building Release 6.6 of the X Window System: XFree86-libraries-4.2.0 > > Wed May 8 01:22:08 EST 2002 > > cd ./config/imake && make -f Makefile.ini BOOTSTRAPCFLAGS="" CC="cc" clean > rm -f ccimake imake.o imake > rm -f *.CKP *.ln *.BAK *.bak *.o core errs ,* *~ *.a tags TAGS make.log \#* > rm -f -r Makefile.proto Makefile Makefile.dep bootstrap > make Makefile.boot > cd ./config/imake && make -f Makefile.ini BOOTSTRAPCFLAGS="" CC="cc" > making imake with BOOTSTRAPCFLAGS= in config/imake > cc -o ccimake -O -I../../include -I../../imports/x11/include/X11 ccimake.c > cc -c -O -I../../include -I../../imports/x11/include/X11 `./ccimake` imake.c > cc -o imake -O -I../../include -I../../imports/x11/include/X11 imake.o > rm -f ./config/makedepend/Makefile.proto > ./config/imake/imake -I./config/cf -s ./config/makedepend/Makefile.proto -f ./config/makedepend/Imakefile -DTOPDIR=../.. -DCURDIR=./config/makedepend > In file included from config/cf/site.def:58, > from config/cf/Imake.tmpl:45, > from Imakefile.c:13: > config/cf/xf86site.def:631: warning: `InstallXdmConfig' redefined > config/cf/host.def:5: warning: this is the location of the previous definition > config/cf/xf86site.def:632: warning: `InstallXinitConfig' redefined > config/cf/host.def:6: warning: this is the location of the previous definition > config/cf/xf86site.def:633: warning: `InstallFSConfig' redefined > config/cf/host.def:7: warning: this is the location of the previous definition > In file included from config/cf/FreeBSD.cf:552, > from config/cf/Imake.tmpl:94, > from Imakefile.c:13: > config/cf/xfree86.cf:14: version.def: No such file or directory > In file included from config/cf/site.def:158, > from config/cf/Imake.tmpl:100, > from Imakefile.c:13: > config/cf/host.def:5: warning: `InstallXdmConfig' redefined > config/cf/xf86site.def:631: warning: this is the location of the previous defini > tion > config/cf/host.def:6: warning: `InstallXinitConfig' redefined > config/cf/xf86site.def:632: warning: this is the location of the previous defini > tion > config/cf/host.def:7: warning: `InstallFSConfig' redefined > config/cf/xf86site.def:637: warning: this is the location of the previous defini > tion > config/cf/host.def:10: warning: `BuildFontServer' redefined > config/cf/xf86site.def:635: warning: this is the location of the previous defini > tion > ./config/imake/imake: Exit code 1. > Stop. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/local/ports/usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-libraries/work/xc. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/local/ports/usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-libraries/work/xc. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-libraries. > -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Tue May 7 23:46:31 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from pcwin002.win.tue.nl (pcwin002.win.tue.nl [131.155.71.72]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9586637B403 for ; Tue, 7 May 2002 23:46:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pcwin002.win.tue.nl (orb_rules@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pcwin002.win.tue.nl (8.12.3/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g486kID0056346; Wed, 8 May 2002 08:46:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from stijn@pcwin002.win.tue.nl) Received: (from stijn@localhost) by pcwin002.win.tue.nl (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g486kIvj056345; Wed, 8 May 2002 08:46:18 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 08:46:18 +0200 From: Stijn Hoop To: Mike Bristow Cc: Lucky Green , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xterm and colour (Was: cvs commit: ports/mail/mutt-devel...) Message-ID: <20020508084618.D56087@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> References: <002301c1f3ff$8c52a100$c33a080a@LUCKYVAIO> <20020507233314.A29484@lindt.urgle.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="32u276st3Jlj2kUU" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: <20020507233314.A29484@lindt.urgle.com>; from mike@urgle.com on Tue, May 07, 2002 at 11:33:15PM +0100 X-Bright-Idea: Let's abolish HTML mail! Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --32u276st3Jlj2kUU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 11:33:15PM +0100, Mike Bristow wrote: > On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 11:38:59PM -0700, Lucky Green wrote: > > [Quotes from various folks about FreeBSD's "xterm" not supporting color > > elided]. >=20 > Actually, I think that TERM is broken. [snip excellent idea] > This is so obvious to me, that I'm sure that everyone has thought > of it and I'm missing some obvious flaw. While I'm no guru, I'd love to see a feature like this. I can see no obvious flaws, other than 'the remote OS doesn't support it' but that's a moot poin= t. The only way to get it into other OSs is to implement it. I'd say go for it! --Stijn --=20 What would this sentence be like if it weren't self-referential? --32u276st3Jlj2kUU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE82Mm6Y3r/tLQmfWcRAlARAJ95g3gEEm8UdRSLQMmjczDhj9nbCQCePCRd KX3TJTYqJhuyfWSFuTsypZs= =9DUS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --32u276st3Jlj2kUU-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 1:15:47 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from HAL9000.wox.org (12-232-222-90.client.attbi.com [12.232.222.90]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE87037B409 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 01:15:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from das@localhost) by HAL9000.wox.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g488FuS28461; Wed, 8 May 2002 01:15:56 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from das) Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 01:15:56 -0700 From: David Schultz To: Dmitry Pryanishnikov Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: buffer size Message-ID: <20020508011556.A28420@HAL9000.wox.org> Mail-Followup-To: Dmitry Pryanishnikov , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20020501164552.GA34873@dru.dn.ua.lucky.freebsd.stable> <20020507131256.C98604-100000@atlantis.dp.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020507131256.C98604-100000@atlantis.dp.ua>; from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua on Tue, May 07, 2002 at 01:18:22PM +0300 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thus spake Dmitry Pryanishnikov : > On Wed, 1 May 2002, Vladislav V. Zhuk wrote: > > > src/sys/dev/syscons/scmouse.c dynamically allocates the cut_buffer > > > array and computes the cut_buffer_size from the screen coordinates. > > > So the buffer should be able to hold the whole screen's content. Do > > > you change the screen's dimension after using the clipboard? > > > > I did't any changes. I use only 80x25 screen size in text mode > > (without X). Therefore, scmouse.c computes the cut_buffer_size > > incorrectly. Try to copy all screen and paste then. > > More specifically, it copies no more than 1024 characters (tested > both on 4.2-RELEASE and 4.4-RELEASE (fill one of your virtual > consoles with text, then select all screen, then switch to another > console, start "cat >file" and paste the text, then press ^D twice - > you'll see that file size will be no more than 1024). Yep, it's a termios limitation, not a syscons limitation. I suspect that there's a way to get syscons to stop sending data when the input queue is full, but it can't be that easy or someone who understands it would have fixed it by now. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 1:16:39 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from skif.net (ns.skif.net [195.58.224.34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB3537B409 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 01:16:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [195.58.224.122] (HELO dru.dn.ua) by skif.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.5.6) with ESMTP-TLS id 5052202 for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 08 May 2002 10:45:12 +0300 Received: (from admin@localhost) by dru.dn.ua (8.12.3/8.12.3) id g487j14Y056218; Wed, 8 May 2002 10:45:01 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from admin) Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 10:45:01 +0300 From: "Vladislav V. Zhuk" To: Christian Fl?gel Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: /dev/dsp: Device busy Message-ID: <20020508074501.GA56048@dru.dn.ua> References: <20020430224551.A2720@walnut.hh59.local> <20020501004850.A5123@walnut.hh59.local> <20020504234843.A35744@walnut.hh59.local> <003f01c1f46f$8767ab70$594bfea9@bender> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <003f01c1f46f$8767ab70$594bfea9@bender> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Sun, May 05, 2002 at 10:00:38PM +0200, Christian Fl?gel wrote: > Just a me too. I'm have this problem too %((( Before cvsup in april 2002 all worked well > Todays upgrade to stable broke it: > > mpg123 somemp3.mp3 > > /dev/dsp: Device busy > play -d /dev/dsp0.2 -v 4 /usr/ftp/pub/wav/TEST.WAV sox: Can't open output file '/dev/dsp0.2': Device busy # fstat /dev/dsp USER CMD PID FD MOUNT INUM MODE SZ|DV R/W NAME -- Vladislav V. Zhuk (06267)3-60-03 admin@dru.dn.ua 2:465/197@FidoNet.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 1:42:10 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from atlantis.dp.ua (atlantis.dp.ua [193.108.46.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B830B37B401 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 01:42:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (dmitry@localhost) by atlantis.dp.ua (8.11.1/8.11.1) with ESMTP id g488fuF43421 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 11:41:57 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua) Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 11:41:56 +0300 (EEST) From: Dmitry Pryanishnikov To: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: buffer size In-Reply-To: <20020508011556.A28420@HAL9000.wox.org> Message-ID: <20020508113620.K26619-100000@atlantis.dp.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello! On Wed, 8 May 2002, David Schultz wrote: > > > (without X). Therefore, scmouse.c computes the cut_buffer_size > > > incorrectly. Try to copy all screen and paste then. > > > > More specifically, it copies no more than 1024 characters (tested > > both on 4.2-RELEASE and 4.4-RELEASE (fill one of your virtual > > consoles with text, then select all screen, then switch to another > > console, start "cat >file" and paste the text, then press ^D twice - > > you'll see that file size will be no more than 1024). > > Yep, it's a termios limitation, not a syscons limitation. I suspect > that there's a way to get syscons to stop sending data when the input > queue is full, but it can't be that easy or someone who understands it > would have fixed it by now. Aha, so-called "typeahead buffer"? Is it possible to increase it's size to, say, 4K (to fit 132x25 screen)? If yes, what #defines one should change? What negative effects could it give? Sincerely, Dmitry Atlantis ISP, System Administrator e-mail: dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua nic-hdl: LYNX-RIPE To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 2:12:16 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailhost.firstcallgroup.co.uk (dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk [194.200.93.142]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5609737B409 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 02:12:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pfrench by mailhost.firstcallgroup.co.uk with local (Exim 3.34 #1) id 175NUU-0001wo-00; Wed, 08 May 2002 10:12:06 +0100 To: leth@primus.ca, stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Experiences with XFree86-4 on 4.6-PRERELEASE Cc: brooks@one-eyed-alien.net In-Reply-To: <20020507215114.H1649-100000@lethargic.dyndns.org> Message-Id: From: Pete French Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 10:12:06 +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > This is off-topic and has nothing to do with XFree86, but using a > different browser might not always be an option. Pete did not specify In this case it wasnt for various reasons, plus I was interested in trying out the new X, which should have been compatible with all the old apps that ran under version 3. Thanks for all the help and advice though - mouse worked fine, and I eventually tracked down the video problem to SuperProbe which (wrongly) reported the card as being 8Meg. It turned out that it's a 4Meg card and this is where the corruption was comming from. Everything now runs perfectly. thanks, -pcf. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 2:58:28 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.wearix.com (lorien.wearix.com [193.197.4.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7506E37B400 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 02:58:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hry.muc.wearix.com (ad96e1d2b.dsl.de.colt.net [217.110.29.43]) by mail.wearix.com (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.3 (i386)) with ESMTP id 78A6A3536; Wed, 8 May 2002 11:58:09 +0200 (CEST) Subject: 4.3-GENERIC was the last booting [WAS: CD-Boot hangs on rootmounting MD] From: Harald Schmalzbauer To: Harald Schmalzbauer Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1020335399.1137.0.camel@hry.muc.wearix.com> References: <1020335399.1137.0.camel@hry.muc.wearix.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0 (Preview Release) Date: 08 May 2002 12:59:50 +0300 Message-Id: <1020851991.19754.1.camel@hry.muc.wearix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG After experimenting a bit I found that 4.3 is installing fine, starting with 4.4 the system hangs. It seems to be bug#30902, but unfortunately I can't change any USB-BIOS settings. Also removing USB from the kernel of 4.5-GENERIC doesn't help. Any chances to fix this bug? -Harry Am Do , 2002-05-02 um 13.29 schrieb Harald Schmalzbauer: > Hello all, > > I'm trying to install FreeBSD 4.5-stable-iso from yesterday and I have > the same problem like with 4.5-release: After probing the sistem hangs > when trying to mount root from md. > > My box is a VAIO SRX41P with the PC-CARD CDROM. I have no Disk-Drive so > unfortunately I can't check floppy-boot. > > I think this has something to do with PC-Card. I can remember I had a > similar problem when PXE-booting a Soekris Net4501 (CF-Memory, no ATA). > > Right now I'm downloading DP1 to check it with 5.0. > > Just to mention: Booting OpenBSD is working but CD is not supported. > > Suggestions are welcome (BIOS doesn't boot USB-CD, no Floppy available, > no Firewire CD, PXE-Boot possible but first I'll try 5.0). > > Thanks, > > -Harry > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 3: 4:33 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail2.ameuro.de (mail2.ameuro.de [62.208.90.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 843BA37B400 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 03:04:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from seth.augenstein.net (pD9EB6D6E.dip.t-dialin.net [217.235.109.110]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail2.ameuro.de (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g48A4OPk024797; Wed, 8 May 2002 12:04:25 +0200 Received: by seth.augenstein.net (Postfix, from userid 666) id A4934115; Wed, 8 May 2002 12:04:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 12:04:28 +0200 From: Norbert Augenstein To: W.K.Offermans@TUe.nl Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Difficulties accessing CDRW Message-Id: <20020508120428.32bee983.norbert@augenstein.net> In-Reply-To: <20020507160801.A1497@tom.chem.tue.nl> References: <20020507160801.A1497@tom.chem.tue.nl> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.7.4 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i386-portbld-freebsd4.5) X-Copyright: (c) Norbert Augenstein -> Forwarding NOT permitted without prior permission! Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG HI, i can use both "a" or "c" on cd or cdrw i have set vfs.usermount=1 cvsup'd sun/may/04/2002 and build world [auge@seth dev]$ id uid=666(auge) gid=0(wheel) groups=0(wheel), 5(operator), 69(network) [auge@seth dev]$ ls -l|grep acd0 crw-r----- 4 root operator 117, 0 May 5 10:28 acd0a crw-r----- 4 root operator 117, 0 May 5 10:28 acd0c lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 5 Apr 7 14:15 cdrom -> acd0c crw-r----- 4 root operator 117, 0 May 5 10:28 racd0a crw-r----- 4 root operator 117, 0 May 5 10:28 racd0c [auge@seth dev]$ ls -l|grep acd1 crw-r----- 4 root operator 117, 8 May 5 10:28 acd1a crw-r----- 4 root operator 117, 8 May 5 10:28 acd1c crw-r----- 4 root operator 117, 8 May 5 10:28 racd1a crw-r----- 4 root operator 117, 8 May 5 10:28 racd1c auge On Tue, 7 May 2002 16:08:01 +0200 Willy Offermans wrote: > Does somebody know why I'm not able to mount my cdrw with > mount -t cd9660 /dev/acd0c /cdrom/ ? > And if I use > mount -t cd9660 /dev/acd0a /cdrom/ > instead, I can acces the CD. > > ************************************* > W.K. Offermans > Eindhoven University of Technology > Department of Chemical Engineering > Laboratory of Catalysis (SKA) > building ST-W 4.27, PO Box 513 > 5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands > Tel: 0(031) 40 247 37 81 > Fax: 0(031) 40 247 50 32 > Home: 0(031) 45 544 49 99 > e-mail: w.k.offermans@tue.nl > http://www.catalysis.nl > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 3:16:50 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from gidgate.gid.co.uk (gid.co.uk [194.32.164.225]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B62937B409 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 03:16:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from rb@localhost) by gidgate.gid.co.uk (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g48AGQa61481; Wed, 8 May 2002 11:16:26 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from rb) Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20020508111424.00c7fba0@gid.co.uk> X-Sender: rbmail@gid.co.uk X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 4.3.2 Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 11:15:34 +0100 To: Christopher Hall , Dennis Mathiasen From: Bob Bishop Subject: Re: ata & mitsumi CD Cc: FreeBSD-stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <200205080114.g481EmQ5024846@x4.tucheng.generalresources.co m> References: <200205071609.g47G9rSL003024@ny-utica5a-435.aburny.adelphia.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 09:14 08/05/02 +0800, Christopher Hall wrote: >In message <200205071609.g47G9rSL003024@ny-utica5a-435.aburny.adelphia.net>, > Dennis Mathiasen writes: > >[...] > >I have tried reverting to the wd driver and included mcd in the kernel, > >but mcd never shows up in dmesg output. How can I (or can I) cause the > >use of this driver? > >I don't know about this, but I am fairly sure that mcd is only for a >Mitsumi ISA interface card. That is correct. -- Bob Bishop +44 (0)118 977 4017 rb@gid.co.uk fax +44 (0)118 989 4254 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 3:30:39 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from luxren2.boostworks.com (luxren2.boostworks.com [194.167.81.214]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A838237B406 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 03:30:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from boostworks.com (rn.lxlun.boostworks.com [192.168.8.100]) by luxren2.boostworks.com (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id g48AUIs10030; Wed, 8 May 2002 12:30:20 +0200 (CEST) Message-Id: <200205081030.g48AUIs10030@luxren2.boostworks.com> Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 12:26:27 +0200 (CEST) From: remy@boostworks.com Subject: Re: fxp0: SCB timeout To: dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: <20020507142539.N90778-100000@resnet.uoregon.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 7 May, Doug White wrote: > On Tue, 7 May 2002 remy@boostworks.com wrote: > >> On 6 May, Paul Dlug wrote: >> > >> > If the general consensus is that adding a PCI NIC and disabling the >> > onboard will fix it, I'll go that route. But I'd rather try to >> > understand what the actual problem is and hopefully get a fix for >> > it. Does anyone have suggestions for further debugging? >> > >> >> I spent around a week, a month ago, trying to understand the problem. >> If it may help, here is the tale: >> >> The machine is an Intel SCB2 (SMP, ServerWorks HE-SL based) with a 64 >> Bits/66Mhz PCI NIC using a 21154BC transparent PCI bridge and two 82559 >> A0 revision chips. > > Funny you mention the SCB2. The BMC hooks the NIC looking for > management packets on this board (and other IPMI-equipped > motherboards). I've gotten large numbers of SCB timeouts when > communicating with the BMC this way. So it might just be the NIC is > being grabbed for another purpose and the driver is sensitive to this. > > Note I have not seen any performance degredation as a result, although > I haven't done large amounts of testing. > > Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve > dwhite@resnet.uoregon.edu | www.FreeBSD.org > IIRC, there have been notice that some IPMI releases were using TCO force mode in specific cases. This means that the 82559 or 82550 is 'reserved' for SMBus transactions and do not send regular packets in the transmit ring (hence the timeouts). BTW, many many thanks, Doug, for your work about IPMI. Reading the SEL records from FBSD is a lot more efficient than hooking a keyboard and a mouse, booting on the support CD and dealing with the Windows 3.11 like interface. RN. IhM To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 4:47: 3 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailhost.firstcallgroup.co.uk (dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk [194.200.93.142]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 624EC37B40F for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 04:47:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pfrench by mailhost.firstcallgroup.co.uk with local (Exim 3.34 #1) id 175PuH-0003AZ-00 for stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Wed, 08 May 2002 12:46:53 +0100 To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Its really not my lucky day with XFRee86-4 is it! Message-Id: From: Pete French Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 12:46:53 +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Last machine to upgrade - again its a Compaq with a Matrox card installed as standard, in this case a Mystique. Got everything going fine using the lessons of last night. But now I am seeing problems whereby the left edge of windows becomed jaggedy; looking to be offset by a few pixels in an undulating pattern. This has the effect of makign all my xterms appear in italiics - and only on the lines with text on them (the rest of the window is unchanged). Not serious, buts its a bug commign from somewhere. :-( -pcf. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 5:20:32 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailgate2.Cadence.COM (mailgate2.Cadence.COM [158.140.2.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B857F37B403 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 05:20:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from exmbx01camb.global.cadence.com (exmbx01camb.Cadence.COM [194.32.100.67]) by mailgate2.Cadence.COM (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id FAA17500; Wed, 8 May 2002 05:20:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pc598cam ([194.32.96.109]) by exmbx01camb.global.cadence.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2966); Wed, 8 May 2002 13:21:18 +0100 Message-ID: <006801c1f68a$c35853b0$6d6020c2@pc598cam> From: "Duncan Barclay" To: , "Pete French" References: Subject: Re: Its really not my lucky day with XFRee86-4 is it! Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 13:20:38 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 May 2002 12:21:18.0815 (UTC) FILETIME=[DB4B4EF0:01C1F68A] X-Received: By mailgate2.Cadence.COM as FAA17500 at Wed May 8 05:20:26 2002 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG D > Last machine to upgrade - again its a Compaq with a Matrox card > installed as standard, in this case a Mystique. Got everything going fine > using the lessons of last night. But now I am seeing problems whereby > the left edge of windows becomed jaggedy; looking to be offset by a few > pixels in an undulating pattern. This has the effect of makign all my > xterms appear in italiics - and only on the lines with text on them (the > rest of the window is unchanged). Is this not horizontal video timings being out a little? Try and use xvidtune and shift the screen right a little. I can get tearing of windows even if the left hand side of the screen looks okay, > > Not serious, buts its a bug commign from somewhere. :-( > > -pcf. s/pcf/bat/g ;-) Duncan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 5:59:17 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from bobo.thehutt.org (pcp709198pcs.alxndr01.va.comcast.net [68.49.240.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FFA537B405 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 05:59:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=nomad.thehutt.org ident=root) by bobo.thehutt.org with esmtp (Exim 4.03) id 175R3B-000D4e-00; Wed, 08 May 2002 09:00:10 -0400 Received: from jerry by nomad.thehutt.org with local (Exim 3.36 #1) id 175R2E-0000UD-00; Wed, 08 May 2002 08:59:10 -0400 Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 08:59:10 -0400 From: Jerry A! To: Harald Schmalzbauer Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.3-GENERIC was the last booting [WAS: CD-Boot hangs on rootmounting MD] Message-ID: <20020508125910.GA1829@nomad.thehutt.org> Reply-To: jerry@thehutt.org References: <1020335399.1137.0.camel@hry.muc.wearix.com> <1020851991.19754.1.camel@hry.muc.wearix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1020851991.19754.1.camel@hry.muc.wearix.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i Organization: Broken Toys Unlimited Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 12:59:50PM +0300, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: : After experimenting a bit I found that 4.3 is installing fine, starting : with 4.4 the system hangs. : It seems to be bug#30902, but unfortunately I can't change any USB-BIOS : settings. Also removing USB from the kernel of 4.5-GENERIC doesn't help. : Any chances to fix this bug? VAIO laptop using the external (Sony CD51) cdrom? Hmm. I'll venture to guess that you want to set the following when you boot up: hw.pcic.intr_path="1" hw.pcic.irq="0" 4.4 introduced PCI routing which the VAIO cdrom doesn't seem to like. Please check out the RELNOTES where this is mentioned for more details. Also, could we *please* FAQ-itize this somewhere? I don't even type the "hw.pcic..." part anymore, it's a mutt macro now. 8) --Jerry Open-Source software isn't a matter of life or death... ...It's much more important than that! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 6: 6:45 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.wearix.com (lorien.wearix.com [193.197.4.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D0E737B405 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 06:06:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hry.muc.wearix.com (ad96e1d2b.dsl.de.colt.net [217.110.29.43]) by mail.wearix.com (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.3 (i386)) with ESMTP id CE2463535; Wed, 8 May 2002 15:06:28 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: 4.3-GENERIC was the last booting [WAS: CD-Boot hangs on rootmounting MD] From: Harald Schmalzbauer To: jerry@thehutt.org Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20020508125910.GA1829@nomad.thehutt.org> References: <1020335399.1137.0.camel@hry.muc.wearix.com> <1020851991.19754.1.camel@hry.muc.wearix.com> <20020508125910.GA1829@nomad.thehutt.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0 (Preview Release) Date: 08 May 2002 16:08:11 +0300 Message-Id: <1020863292.20069.4.camel@hry.muc.wearix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Am Mi , 2002-05-08 um 15.59 schrieb Jerry A!: > On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 12:59:50PM +0300, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > : After experimenting a bit I found that 4.3 is installing fine, starting > : with 4.4 the system hangs. > : It seems to be bug#30902, but unfortunately I can't change any USB-BIOS > : settings. Also removing USB from the kernel of 4.5-GENERIC doesn't help. > : Any chances to fix this bug? > > VAIO laptop using the external (Sony CD51) cdrom? Hmm. I'll venture to > guess that you want to set the following when you boot up: > > hw.pcic.intr_path="1" > hw.pcic.irq="0" > > 4.4 introduced PCI routing which the VAIO cdrom doesn't seem to like. > Please check out the RELNOTES where this is mentioned for more details. Thanks for the hint. I read that today. But it hangs even when PXE-booting. So I excluded the cd-rom as possible troublemaker. But I'll try that ASAP and let you know. Thanks, -Harry > > Also, could we *please* FAQ-itize this somewhere? I don't even type the > "hw.pcic..." part anymore, it's a mutt macro now. 8) > > --Jerry > > Open-Source software isn't a matter of life or death... > ...It's much more important than that! > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 6:44:40 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailhost.firstcallgroup.co.uk (dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk [194.200.93.142]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D546037B408 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 06:44:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pfrench by mailhost.firstcallgroup.co.uk with local (Exim 3.34 #1) id 175RkC-0003d4-00; Wed, 08 May 2002 14:44:36 +0100 To: dmlb@dmlb.org, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Its really not my lucky day with XFRee86-4 is it! In-Reply-To: <006801c1f68a$c35853b0$6d6020c2@pc598cam> Message-Id: From: Pete French Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 14:44:36 +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Is this not horizontal video timings being out a little? Try and use > xvidtune and shift the screen right a > little. I can get tearing of windows even if the left hand side of the > screen looks okay, Interesting Idea. I did run xvidtune, but cant make the effect go away. I set all the parameters back to precisely what they were on the previous configuration of XFree86 and its still there. I think you are right about it being a video artefact though, as it is dependent on the contents of the screen line; you can change the effect by placing windows with differenmt content to the right of it. I also notice that xvidtune does not alter my XFree86Config file, and that the settings I have applied do not appear to persist the next time I run up X11. Which is kind of incidental as it doesnt fix the bug anyway, but does concern me a bit. Where should these parameters be stored in the new version of X4 > s/pcf/bat/g ;-) Indeed, Raggy, indeed... :-) -pcf. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 6:50:18 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.wearix.com (lorien.wearix.com [193.197.4.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED03537B40C for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 06:50:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from hry.muc.wearix.com (ad96e1d2b.dsl.de.colt.net [217.110.29.43]) by mail.wearix.com (Postfix on SuSE Linux 7.3 (i386)) with ESMTP id 27C183574; Wed, 8 May 2002 15:50:04 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: 4.3-GENERIC was the last booting [WAS: CD-Boot hangs on rootmounting MD] From: Harald Schmalzbauer To: jerry@thehutt.org Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20020508125910.GA1829@nomad.thehutt.org> References: <1020335399.1137.0.camel@hry.muc.wearix.com> <1020851991.19754.1.camel@hry.muc.wearix.com> <20020508125910.GA1829@nomad.thehutt.org> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0 (Preview Release) Date: 08 May 2002 16:51:46 +0300 Message-Id: <1020865908.20069.6.camel@hry.muc.wearix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Am Mi , 2002-05-08 um 15.59 schrieb Jerry A!: > On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 12:59:50PM +0300, Harald Schmalzbauer wrote: > : After experimenting a bit I found that 4.3 is installing fine, starting > : with 4.4 the system hangs. > : It seems to be bug#30902, but unfortunately I can't change any USB-BIOS > : settings. Also removing USB from the kernel of 4.5-GENERIC doesn't help. > : Any chances to fix this bug? > > VAIO laptop using the external (Sony CD51) cdrom? Hmm. I'll venture to > guess that you want to set the following when you boot up: > > hw.pcic.intr_path="1" > hw.pcic.irq="0" YEP! That helped. But why is it hanging the system even if no card is inserted (when booting from network/floppy)? Were there any disadvantages if the old ISA-Routing would be made the default for installation? Thanks, -Harry > > 4.4 introduced PCI routing which the VAIO cdrom doesn't seem to like. > Please check out the RELNOTES where this is mentioned for more details. > > Also, could we *please* FAQ-itize this somewhere? I don't even type the > "hw.pcic..." part anymore, it's a mutt macro now. 8) > > --Jerry > > Open-Source software isn't a matter of life or death... > ...It's much more important than that! > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 6:51:22 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailgate2.Cadence.COM (mailgate2.Cadence.COM [158.140.2.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B773A37B408 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 06:51:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from exmbx01camb.global.cadence.com (exmbx01camb.Cadence.COM [194.32.100.67]) by mailgate2.Cadence.COM (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id GAA26708; Wed, 8 May 2002 06:51:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pc598cam ([194.32.96.109]) by exmbx01camb.global.cadence.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2966); Wed, 8 May 2002 14:52:05 +0100 Message-ID: <00b701c1f697$71be3530$6d6020c2@pc598cam> From: "Duncan Barclay" To: , "Pete French" References: Subject: Re: Its really not my lucky day with XFRee86-4 is it! Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 14:51:25 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 May 2002 13:52:05.0487 (UTC) FILETIME=[89C37FF0:01C1F697] X-Received: By mailgate2.Cadence.COM as GAA26708 at Wed May 8 06:51:13 2002 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pete French" To: ; Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 2:44 PM Subject: Re: Its really not my lucky day with XFRee86-4 is it! > > Is this not horizontal video timings being out a little? Try and use > > xvidtune and shift the screen right a > > little. I can get tearing of windows even if the left hand side of the > > screen looks okay, > > Interesting Idea. I did run xvidtune, but cant make the effect go away. > I set all the parameters back to precisely what they were on the previous > configuration of XFree86 and its still there. I think you are right about > it being a video artefact though, as it is dependent on the contents of > the screen line; you can change the effect by placing windows with differenmt > content to the right of it. Are all the dot clocks and timing pulses exactly the same? Is it a monitor or LCD? If a monitor, have you moved it (magnetic dip)? If an LCD press the case around the screen to see if it is the contacts to the LCD itself - I have a laptop that goes cranky like this with bad contacts. > I also notice that xvidtune does not alter my XFree86Config file, and that > the settings I have applied do not appear to persist the next time I run up > X11. Which is kind of incidental as it doesnt fix the bug anyway, but does > concern me a bit. Where should these parameters be stored in the new > version of X4 There is a button on xvidtune to write a modeline to stdout. You can then add this into XF86Config. > > s/pcf/bat/g ;-) > > Indeed, Raggy, indeed... :-) > > -pcf. > > ________________________________________________________________________ Duncan Barclay | God smiles upon the little children, dmlb@dmlb.org | the alcoholics, and the permanently stoned. dmlb@freebsd.org| Steven King ________________________________________________________________________ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 7:19: 5 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailhost.firstcallgroup.co.uk (dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk [194.200.93.142]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C6EA37B409 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 07:19:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pfrench by mailhost.firstcallgroup.co.uk with local (Exim 3.34 #1) id 175SHU-0003ki-00; Wed, 08 May 2002 15:19:00 +0100 To: dmlb@dmlb.org, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Its really not my lucky day with XFRee86-4 is it! In-Reply-To: <00b701c1f697$71be3530$6d6020c2@pc598cam> Message-Id: From: Pete French Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 15:19:00 +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Are all the dot clocks and timing pulses exactly the same? old entry: Modeline "1024x768" 75.00 1024 1044 1180 1316 768 775 781 798 -hsync -vsync new entry: Mode "1024x768" HTimings 1024 1044 1180 1316 VTimings 768 775 781 798 DotClock 75 EndMode thats identical as far as I can make out, unless there are some parameters I havent found. > Is it a monitor or LCD? If a monitor, have you moved it (magnetic dip)? If Monitor - and it hasnt budged an inch (that was the first thing I thought of, and I degaussed it too) Oh well, guess I shall just have to live with it :-( -pcf. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 7:21:51 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from networksolutions.com (h79.s233.netsol.com [216.168.233.79]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 537F337B404 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 07:21:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from mts@localhost) by networksolutions.com (8.9.3/8.9.1) id KAA22397; Wed, 8 May 2002 10:21:37 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 10:21:37 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <200205081421.KAA22397@networksolutions.com> To: freebsd-stable From: hostmaster@networksolutions.com Subject: Re: [NIC-020508.2d1c] Reply-To: hostmaster@networksolutions.com X-MTS-LoopDetect: NetworkSolutions_Registration_Services In-Reply-To: Your message of Wed, 8 May 2002 11:07:48 -0300 <200205081407.g48E7mw25241@einstein.ctex.eb.mil.br> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG This is an automatic reply from Network Solutions to let you know that we’ve received your message. As soon as our automated systems or customer service representatives have had a chance to process your request or investigate and answer your inquiry, we’ll send you a response. If you need to reach us about your message, please use our Web form at http://goto.netsol.com/help/contactus.html and be sure to include the tracking number [NIC-020508.2d1c] in your message. Best regards, VeriSign, Inc. http://www.netsol.com For customer service, Ask us at http://www.netsol.com. Please do not reply directly to this message. =================================================================== IMPORTANT INFORMATION Did you know you can Ask us your customer service questions, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week? Our interactive service is available for you at http://www.netsol.com. If you need to make a change to records associated with your domain name, we’ve got great tools for you to use! If you need to: change the registrant's address appoint a new or different contact to manage your domain name OR switch ISPs (i.e., change primary and/or secondary name servers) complete a Service Agreement modification form. Learn how at http://goto.netsol.com/faq-mod. If you need to change information about a contact who is managing your domain name, complete a Contact Form modification. Learn how at http://goto.netsol.com/faq-contact. If you need to register or update information about a name server, complete a Host Form modification. Learn how at http://goto.netsol.com/faq-host. Every day at 12:00 Noon and 12:00 Midnight Eastern Time, new and corrected information is shared with computers all over the world. If your modification or request is processed by either of these times, your changes will be included in these updates. You'll be able to view your updated record in our WHOIS database 24-48 hours from the time your request is processed. Best regards, VeriSign, Inc. http://www.netsol.com aack01 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 7:24:39 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailgate2.Cadence.COM (mailgate2.Cadence.COM [158.140.2.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4887A37B409 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 07:24:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from exmbx01camb.global.cadence.com (exmbx01camb.Cadence.COM [194.32.100.67]) by mailgate2.Cadence.COM (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA01217; Wed, 8 May 2002 07:24:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pc598cam ([194.32.96.109]) by exmbx01camb.global.cadence.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.2966); Wed, 8 May 2002 15:25:09 +0100 Message-ID: <00bc01c1f69c$101d95f0$6d6020c2@pc598cam> From: "Duncan Barclay" To: , "Pete French" References: Subject: Re: Its really not my lucky day with XFRee86-4 is it! Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 15:24:28 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 May 2002 14:25:09.0221 (UTC) FILETIME=[28294950:01C1F69C] X-Received: By mailgate2.Cadence.COM as HAA01217 at Wed May 8 07:24:16 2002 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG The hsync and vsync specifications are different. (Some) Monitors use the polarity of these to set the mode. Maybe add them to the new modeline. D ----- Original Message ----- From: "Pete French" To: ; Sent: Wednesday, May 08, 2002 3:19 PM Subject: Re: Its really not my lucky day with XFRee86-4 is it! > > Are all the dot clocks and timing pulses exactly the same? > > old entry: > > Modeline "1024x768" 75.00 1024 1044 1180 1316 768 775 781 798 -hsync -vsync > > new entry: > > Mode "1024x768" > HTimings 1024 1044 1180 1316 > VTimings 768 775 781 798 > DotClock 75 > EndMode > > > thats identical as far as I can make out, unless there are some parameters > I havent found. > > > Is it a monitor or LCD? If a monitor, have you moved it (magnetic dip)? If > > Monitor - and it hasnt budged an inch (that was the first thing I thought of, > and I degaussed it too) > > Oh well, guess I shall just have to live with it :-( > > -pcf. > ________________________________________________________________________ Duncan Barclay | God smiles upon the little children, dmlb@dmlb.org | the alcoholics, and the permanently stoned. dmlb@freebsd.org| Steven King ________________________________________________________________________ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 7:29:53 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mistral.imasy.or.jp (R209121.ppp.dion.ne.jp [61.198.209.121]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62FDB37B40E for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 07:29:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mistral.imasy.or.jp (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by mistral.imasy.or.jp (8.12.3/8.12.3/mistral) with ESMTP id g48ESmP4000458 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 8 May 2002 23:28:50 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from mistral@imasy.or.jp) Received: (from sarumaru@localhost) by mistral.imasy.or.jp (8.12.3/8.12.2/Submit) id g48ESDJO000452; Wed, 8 May 2002 23:28:13 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from sarumaru) From: mistral@imasy.or.jp (Yoshihiko SARUMARU) To: H@Schmalzbauer.de Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.3-GENERIC was the last booting [WAS: CD-Boot hangs onrootmounting MD] In-Reply-To: Your message of "08 May 2002 12:59:50 +0300". <1020851991.19754.1.camel@hry.muc.wearix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Mailer: mnews [version 1.22PL5] 2001-02/07(Wed) Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 23:28:13 +0900 Message-ID: <020508232813.M0100425@mistral.imasy.or.jp> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, H@Schmalzbauer.de wrote: > > I'm trying to install FreeBSD 4.5-stable-iso from yesterday and I have > > the same problem like with 4.5-release: After probing the sistem hangs > > when trying to mount root from md. > > > > My box is a VAIO SRX41P with the PC-CARD CDROM. I have no Disk-Drive so > > unfortunately I can't check floppy-boot. Try # echo 'hw.pcic.intr_path=1' >> /boot/loader.conf then reboot. or you are booting form install media, stop loader by pressing space key then try loader> set hw.pcic.intr_path=1 loader> boot (Sorry, I don't remember how the prompt is) If this can't help you, additional hw.pcic.irq=0 may be required. -- Yoshihiko SARUMARU mail: mistral@imasy.or.jp web: http://www.imasy.or.jp/~mistral/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 7:35:18 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailhost.firstcallgroup.co.uk (dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk [194.200.93.142]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D41337B404 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 07:35:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pfrench by mailhost.firstcallgroup.co.uk with local (Exim 3.34 #1) id 175SXC-0003nu-00; Wed, 08 May 2002 15:35:14 +0100 To: dmlb@dmlb.org, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Its really not my lucky day with XFRee86-4 is it! In-Reply-To: <00bc01c1f69c$101d95f0$6d6020c2@pc598cam> Message-Id: From: Pete French Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 15:35:14 +0100 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > The hsync and vsync specifications are different. (Some) Monitors use the > polarity of these to set the mode. Maybe add them to the new modeline. O.K., I missed those I admit. Now added. No effect. :-( -pcf. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 7:45:27 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from fep1.012.net.il (fep1.goldenlines.net.il [212.117.129.200]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE37B37B406 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 07:45:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cerberus.oven.org ([212.199.197.129]) by fep1.012.net.il with ESMTP id <20020508143445.TNC18870.fep1@cerberus.oven.org> for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 17:34:45 +0300 Received: from alchemy.oven.org (alchemy.oven.org [10.0.1.2]) by cerberus.oven.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g48EgVZB022898 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 17:42:31 +0300 (IDT) (envelope-from roman@xpert.com) Received: from alchemy.oven.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alchemy.oven.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g48EZh8I002528 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 17:35:43 +0300 (IDT) (envelope-from roman@xpert.com) Received: from localhost (mapc@localhost) by alchemy.oven.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) with ESMTP id g48EZfpC002525 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 17:35:42 +0300 (IDT) X-Authentication-Warning: alchemy.oven.org: mapc owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 17:35:41 +0300 (IDT) From: Roman Shterenzon X-X-Sender: mapc@alchemy.oven.org To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ata recognition problem in 4.6-PRE Message-ID: <20020508173131.R2516-100000@alchemy.oven.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Another problem is that in my old computer (P90) the Goldstar CDROM is not recognized anymore. It happened in the last month update AFAIK, perhaps before that. In the new kernel: ata1-master: timeout sending command=a1 s=80 e=00 ata1-master: ATAPI identify failed In the old one: acd0: CDROM at ata1-master using PIO3 --Roman To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 8:43:47 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from teebar.directski.com (mauer.directski.com [193.95.161.233]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDC7337B404; Wed, 8 May 2002 08:43:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from directski.com (dermot.traveldev.com [192.168.0.50]) by teebar.directski.com (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g48FhYGk046585; Wed, 8 May 2002 16:43:34 +0100 (IST) (envelope-from dermot@directski.com) Message-ID: <3CD947A8.AB7B2480@directski.com> Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 16:43:36 +0100 From: Dermot McNally X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.77 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en,de,fr,ga MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kal Torak Cc: freebsd-questions , FreeBSD Stable Subject: Re: XFree86-4-libraries wont build (fixed) References: <3CD8C15B.8020201@quake.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Kal Torak wrote: > > Hi... > > This seems to happen to me when ever I try and make something large > from the ports, that part of it wont build!! Anyway trying to build > XFree86-4 from the ports cvsup'd yesterday and it fails in the libraries > part... OK, with Kal's help, I've overcome this same problem. What we did: Add the line "XFREE86_VERSION=4" to /etc/make.conf (didn't fix the problem, but is no harm) Build the port again, but having first zapped /usr/X11R6 (it turned out we had installed this from CD, probably still version 3). Dermot -- --------------------------------------------------------------- Dermot McNally, Chief Technical Officer, Directski.com dermot@directski.com http://www.directski.com - ski the web To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 8:59:46 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rwcrmhc54.attbi.com (rwcrmhc54.attbi.com [216.148.227.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAADE37B41E; Wed, 8 May 2002 08:59:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bmah.dyndns.org ([12.233.149.189]) by rwcrmhc54.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020508155923.NWBX25765.rwcrmhc54.attbi.com@bmah.dyndns.org>; Wed, 8 May 2002 15:59:23 +0000 Received: from intruder.bmah.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by bmah.dyndns.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g48FxML8029815; Wed, 8 May 2002 08:59:22 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah@intruder.bmah.org) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by intruder.bmah.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g48FxMne029814; Wed, 8 May 2002 08:59:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200205081559.g48FxMne029814@intruder.bmah.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5+ 20020506 with nmh-1.0.4 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-qa@freebsd.org Cc: bmah@freebsd.org Subject: Belated HEADS-UP? RELENG_4 code freeze From: bmah@freebsd.org (Bruce A. Mah) Reply-To: bmah@freebsd.org X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A 2V%N&+ X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 08:59:22 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG For a variety of reasons, I think we (the RE team) might not have announced this to all the applicable lists. Those of you who are not committers may be seeing this for the first time...if so, our apologies: The RELENG_4 branch is in code-freeze, in preparation for a 1 June 2002 release of FreeBSD 4.6. Developers requesting MFCs should send these requests to re@. Discussion of QA issues should go to the freebsd-qa@ list. Details on the release schedule can be found at: http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/4.6R/schedule.html A preliminary testing guide (a work in progress) can be found at: http://www.FreeBSD.org/releases/4.6R/qa.html The release notes (also a work in progress) can be found at: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~bmah/relnotes/ Bruce. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 9:26:16 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from damnhippie.dyndns.org (12-253-177-2.client.attbi.com [12.253.177.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF0FA37B400 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 09:26:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.22.42.2] (peace.hippie.lan [172.22.42.2]) by damnhippie.dyndns.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g48GQAG75312 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 10:26:10 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org) User-Agent: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 5.01 (1630) Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 10:26:16 -0600 Subject: Re: XFree86-4-libraries wont build (fixed) From: Ian To: freebsd-stable Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <3CD947A8.AB7B2480@directski.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > From: Dermot McNally > > Kal Torak wrote: >> >> [XFree86-4 build errors]. > > OK, with Kal's help, I've overcome this same problem. What we did: > > Add the line "XFREE86_VERSION=4" to /etc/make.conf (didn't fix the > problem, but is no harm) > > Build the port again, but having first zapped /usr/X11R6 (it turned out > we had installed this from CD, probably still version 3). > > Dermot > Having version 3 around makes it impossible to build version 4 in ports? That sounds like something that needs to be fixed in the port. I had exactly the same errors you did, I just gave up easily because I have no real desire to run a newer version, since version 3 does everything I need. -- Ian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 9:27:26 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from leviathan.inethouston.net (leviathan.inethouston.net [66.64.12.249]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F0F737B405 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 09:27:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by leviathan.inethouston.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DBD9531992D; Wed, 8 May 2002 11:27:20 -0500 (CDT) Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 11:27:20 -0500 From: "David W. Chapman Jr." To: Ian Cc: freebsd-stable Subject: Re: XFree86-4-libraries wont build (fixed) Message-ID: <20020508162720.GP8681@leviathan.inethouston.net> Reply-To: "David W. Chapman Jr." Mail-Followup-To: Ian , freebsd-stable References: <3CD947A8.AB7B2480@directski.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 4.5-STABLE i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 10:26:16AM -0600, Ian wrote: > > > > From: Dermot McNally > > > > Kal Torak wrote: > >> > >> [XFree86-4 build errors]. > > > > OK, with Kal's help, I've overcome this same problem. What we did: > > > > Add the line "XFREE86_VERSION=4" to /etc/make.conf (didn't fix the > > problem, but is no harm) > > > > Build the port again, but having first zapped /usr/X11R6 (it turned out > > we had installed this from CD, probably still version 3). > > > > Dermot > > > > Having version 3 around makes it impossible to build version 4 in ports? > That sounds like something that needs to be fixed in the port. > > I had exactly the same errors you did, I just gave up easily because I have > no real desire to run a newer version, since version 3 does everything I > need. Everyone is eager to suggest the port fix it, but not so eager to impliment a method for this -- David W. Chapman Jr. dwcjr@inethouston.net Raintree Network Services, Inc. dwcjr@freebsd.org FreeBSD Committer To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 9:37:45 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail1.telekom.de (mail1.telekom.de [62.225.183.235]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBBDB37B40A; Wed, 8 May 2002 09:37:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from g8pbt.blf01.telekom.de by G8SBV.dmz.telekom.de with ESMTP; Wed, 8 May 2002 18:36:27 +0200 Received: by G8PBT.blf01.telekom.de with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 8 May 2002 18:37:35 +0200 Message-Id: <5D90F2332B50D411BE8A00209412104C038508E0@QHS63> From: alan.edmonds@t-motion.net To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-qa@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Belated HEADS-UP? RELENG_4 code freeze Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 18:33:33 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Can someone look at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=misc/37562 before release? It's a simple README file change (I think). Alan Edmonds To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 9:41:23 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from texas.pobox.com (texas.pobox.com [64.49.223.111]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F35137B405 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 09:41:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from jamil (sdsl-66-80-32-187.dsl.iad.megapath.net [66.80.32.187]) by texas.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6787C4535E; Wed, 8 May 2002 12:41:13 -0400 (EDT) From: Jamil Taylor To: , Ian Cc: freebsd-stable X-Mailer: PocoMail 2.6 (1006) - Licensed Version Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 12:36:09 -0400 X-URL: http://www.jamiltaylor.net In-Reply-To: <20020508162720.GP8681@leviathan.inethouston.net> Subject: Re: XFree86-4-libraries wont build (fixed) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <20020508164113.6787C4535E@texas.pobox.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG You know, I was just about to mail the output of a build error I= am running into right now with the XFree86-4 port. My system has= 4.02 running right now, and I need to update it to 4.20 for support of= my Radeon video card. My build consistently fails at the XFree86-4-documents port each= time: "Makefile", line 1050: Missing dependency operator "Makefile", line 1051: Missing dependency operator "Makefile", line 1100: Missing dependency operator "Makefile", line 1125: Missing dependency operator "Makefile", line 1126: Missing dependency operator make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-documents/work/xc/doc/specs. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-documents/work/xc/doc. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-documents. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4. This occurred after a fresh (repeated) cvsup of my ports tree. On Wed, 8 May 2002 11:27:20 -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: >On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 10:26:16AM -0600, Ian wrote: >> >> >>>From: Dermot McNally >>> >>>Kal Torak wrote: >>>> >>>>[XFree86-4 build errors]. >>> >>>OK, with Kal's help, I've overcome this same problem. What we >>>did: >>> >>>Add the line "XFREE86_VERSION=3D4" to /etc/make.conf (didn't= fix >>>the >>>problem, but is no harm) >>> >>>Build the port again, but having first zapped /usr/X11R6 (it >>>turned out >>>we had installed this from CD, probably still version 3). >>> >>>Dermot >>> >> >>Having version 3 around makes it impossible to build version 4= in >>ports? >>That sounds like something that needs to be fixed in the port. >> >>I had exactly the same errors you did, I just gave up easily >>because I have >>no real desire to run a newer version, since version 3 does >>everything I >>need. > >Everyone is eager to suggest the port fix it, but not so eager= to >impliment a method for this > -- Jamil Taylor, jamil_taylor@pobox.com on 05/08/2002 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 9:51: 4 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from damnhippie.dyndns.org (12-253-177-2.client.attbi.com [12.253.177.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E960E37B400 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 09:50:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.22.42.2] (peace.hippie.lan [172.22.42.2]) by damnhippie.dyndns.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g48GouG75523 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 10:50:56 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org) User-Agent: Microsoft Outlook Express Macintosh Edition - 5.01 (1630) Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 10:51:02 -0600 Subject: Re: XFree86-4-libraries wont build (fixed) From: Ian To: freebsd-stable Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20020508162720.GP8681@leviathan.inethouston.net> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >>> [XFree86-4 build errors]. >>> >> >> Having version 3 around makes it impossible to build version 4 in ports? >> That sounds like something that needs to be fixed in the port. >> >> I had exactly the same errors you did, I just gave up easily because I have >> no real desire to run a newer version, since version 3 does everything I >> need. > > Everyone is eager to suggest the port fix it, but not so eager to > impliment a method for this > If I knew how to fix it, I'd be happy to submit it. I've looked into some ports makefiles and the patch system and whatnot just enough to realize I don't understand it. It's nicely magical, it "just works". I can understand that fixing the XFree86-4 build problem when version 3 is installed could be anything from "very hard" to "there's just no way to get there from here". But in that case, a workaround in lieu of a fix may be in order: have the makefile check for the existance of a v3 /usr/X11R6 directory and spit out a useful "whine and die" message about how that can create problems. Maybe it could spit out a url to a FAQ about it, or something. -- Ian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 10:45:51 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rutger.owt.com (rutger.owt.com [204.118.6.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBC5C37B40A for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 10:45:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from owt.com (owt-207-41-94-232.owt.com [207.41.94.232]) by rutger.owt.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA23610; Wed, 8 May 2002 10:45:28 -0700 Message-ID: <3CD96436.7040506@owt.com> Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 10:45:26 -0700 From: Kent Stewart User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:0.9.4.1) Gecko/20020314 Netscape6/6.2.2 X-Accept-Language: en-us, es-mx MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jamil Taylor Cc: dwcjr@inethouston.net, Ian , freebsd-stable Subject: Re: XFree86-4-libraries wont build (fixed) References: <20020508164113.6787C4535E@texas.pobox.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Jamil Taylor wrote: > You know, I was just about to mail the output of a build error I am > running into right now with the XFree86-4 port. My system has 4.02 > running right now, and I need to update it to 4.20 for support of my > Radeon video card. > > My build consistently fails at the XFree86-4-documents port each > time: > > "Makefile", line 1050: Missing dependency operator > "Makefile", line 1051: Missing dependency operator > "Makefile", line 1100: Missing dependency operator > "Makefile", line 1125: Missing dependency operator > "Makefile", line 1126: Missing dependency operator > make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue > *** Error code 1 > Stop in /usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-documents/work/xc/doc/specs. > *** Error code 1 > Stop in /usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-documents/work/xc/doc. > *** Error code 1 > Stop in /usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-documents. > *** Error code 1 > Stop in /usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4. > > This occurred after a fresh (repeated) cvsup of my ports tree. Did you rebuild imake-4.2.0? I had no problems building all of XFree86-4.2.0 last night but I started with fresh dependancies. Kent > > On Wed, 8 May 2002 11:27:20 -0500, David W. Chapman Jr. wrote: > >>On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 10:26:16AM -0600, Ian wrote: >> >>> >>>>From: Dermot McNally >>>> >>>>Kal Torak wrote: >>>> >>>>>[XFree86-4 build errors]. >>>>> >>>>OK, with Kal's help, I've overcome this same problem. What we >>>>did: >>>> >>>>Add the line "XFREE86_VERSION=4" to /etc/make.conf (didn't fix >>>>the >>>>problem, but is no harm) >>>> >>>>Build the port again, but having first zapped /usr/X11R6 (it >>>>turned out >>>>we had installed this from CD, probably still version 3). >>>> >>>>Dermot >>>> >>>> >>>Having version 3 around makes it impossible to build version 4 in >>>ports? >>>That sounds like something that needs to be fixed in the port. >>> >>>I had exactly the same errors you did, I just gave up easily >>>because I have >>>no real desire to run a newer version, since version 3 does >>>everything I >>>need. >>> >>Everyone is eager to suggest the port fix it, but not so eager to >>impliment a method for this >> >> > > -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 10:48:24 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mailout06.sul.t-online.com (mailout06.sul.t-online.com [194.25.134.19]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6BE037B40D for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 10:48:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from fwd10.sul.t-online.de by mailout06.sul.t-online.com with smtp id 175VXm-0001W4-01; Wed, 08 May 2002 19:48:02 +0200 Received: from perec.local (520096264755-0001@[217.82.16.190]) by fwd10.sul.t-online.com with esmtp id 175VXi-18eC2qC; Wed, 8 May 2002 19:47:58 +0200 Received: from perec.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by perec.local (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g48Hlvvp001466; Wed, 8 May 2002 19:47:58 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from krion@perec.local) Received: (from krion@localhost) by perec.local (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g48Hlvmh001465; Wed, 8 May 2002 19:47:57 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 19:47:57 +0200 From: kirill.ponomarew@t-online.de (Kirill Ponomarew) To: Ian Cc: freebsd-stable Subject: Re: XFree86-4-libraries wont build (fixed) Message-ID: <20020508194757.A1372@perec> Mail-Followup-To: Kirill Ponomarew , Ian , freebsd-stable References: <20020508162720.GP8681@leviathan.inethouston.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from freebsd@damnhippie.dyndns.org on Wed, May 08, 2002 at 10:51:02AM -0600 X-Sender: 520096264755-0001@t-dialin.net Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 10:51:02AM -0600, Ian wrote: | >>> [XFree86-4 build errors]. | >>>=20 | >>=20 | >> Having version 3 around makes it impossible to build version 4 in port= s? | >> That sounds like something that needs to be fixed in the port. | >>=20 | >> I had exactly the same errors you did, I just gave up easily because I= have | >> no real desire to run a newer version, since version 3 does everything= I | >> need. | >=20 | > Everyone is eager to suggest the port fix it, but not so eager to | > impliment a method for this | >=20 |=20 | If I knew how to fix it, I'd be happy to submit it. I've looked into some | ports makefiles and the patch system and whatnot just enough to realize I | don't understand it. It's nicely magical, it "just works". I did simply=20 touch /usr/local/ports/usr/ports/x11/XFree86-4-libraries/work/xc/config/cf/= version.def and it worked :-) Kirill --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE82WTMQC1G6a60JuURAgFgAJ4084+8NdkRPIB8t41yg1nJOQYtdwCgjN96 sFVQ1sMNAzz93ZFA6esv6PA= =DO45 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gBBFr7Ir9EOA20Yy-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 10:53:55 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from back2.mail.megapathdsl.net (back2.mail.megapathdsl.net [66.80.60.36]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91E7837B403 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 10:53:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [216.83.188.5] (account ) by back2.mail.megapathdsl.net (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 3.5.8) with HTTP id 3634729; Wed, 08 May 2002 10:53:51 -0700 From: Jamil Taylor Subject: Re: XFree86-4-libraries wont build (fixed) To: Kent Stewart , Jamil Taylor Cc: dwcjr@inethouston.net, Ian , freebsd-stable X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro Web Mailer v.3.5.8 Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 10:53:51 -0700 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <3CD96436.7040506@owt.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I did not rebuild imake-4.2.0. Someone else had sent me mail mentioning to do this. I will do so and try again as soon as I return to the machine. Thanks. On Wed, 08 May 2002 10:45:26 -0700 Kent Stewart wrote: >Did you rebuild imake-4.2.0? I had no problems building all of >XFree86-4.2.0 last night but I started with fresh >dependancies. > >Kent To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 10:59:44 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from www.golsyd.net.au (golsyd.net.au [203.57.20.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4498337B406 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 10:59:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [203.51.11.73] by www.quake.com.au (NTMail 4.30.0012/AB6169.63.5324aadf) with ESMTP id pehfaaaa for ; Thu, 9 May 2002 03:59:37 +1000 Message-ID: <3CD96771.1090307@quake.com.au> Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 03:59:13 +1000 From: Kal Torak Organization: Quake Networking User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Win98; en-US; rv:0.9.9) Gecko/20020311 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Cc: freebsd-stable Subject: Re: XFree86-4-libraries wont build (fixed) References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Ian wrote: > > I can understand that fixing the XFree86-4 build problem when version 3 is > installed could be anything from "very hard" to "there's just no way to get > there from here". But in that case, a workaround in lieu of a fix may be in > order: have the makefile check for the existance of a v3 /usr/X11R6 > directory and spit out a useful "whine and die" message about how that can > create problems. Maybe it could spit out a url to a FAQ about it, or > something. Yep even a simple message when you type make that says "WARNING: this may fail to build if you have XFree86 3.x installed!!!" I was sitting around wondering why the damn thing wouldnt make and really it gave me no clues... If there was something like that I would of given 3.x a nice rm -rf as soon as I ran into problems ;) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 11:16: 1 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BA78C37B40B for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 11:15:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 6612 invoked by uid 0); 8 May 2002 18:15:46 -0000 Received: from p509104e6.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (HELO mail.gsinet.sittig.org) (80.145.4.230) by mail.gmx.net (mp007-rz3) with SMTP; 8 May 2002 18:15:46 -0000 Received: (qmail 31502 invoked from network); 8 May 2002 17:48:37 -0000 Received: from shell.gsinet.sittig.org (192.168.11.153) by mail.gsinet.sittig.org with SMTP; 8 May 2002 17:48:37 -0000 Received: (from sittig@localhost) by shell.gsinet.sittig.org (8.11.3/8.11.3) id g48HmRN31487 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 8 May 2002 19:48:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from sittig) Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 19:48:27 +0200 From: Gerhard Sittig To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: buffer size Message-ID: <20020508194827.Z1494@shell.gsinet.sittig.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20020501164552.GA34873@dru.dn.ua.lucky.freebsd.stable> <20020507131256.C98604-100000@atlantis.dp.ua> <20020507102647.GZ1761@dru.dn.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20020507102647.GZ1761@dru.dn.ua>; from admin@dru.dn.ua on Tue, May 07, 2002 at 01:26:47PM +0300 Organization: System Defenestrators Inc. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG [ The message I reply to had a broken attribution. So I cite two single paragraphs to get the history back. ] Here is what I (Gerhard Sittig) wrote in the thread: > > src/sys/dev/syscons/scmouse.c dynamically allocates the cut_buffer > array and computes the cut_buffer_size from the screen coordinates. > So the buffer should be able to hold the whole screen's content. Do > you change the screen's dimension after using the clipboard? On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 13:26 +0300, Vladislav V. Zhuk wrote: > > On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 01:18:22PM +0300, Dmitry Pryanishnikov wrote: > > > More specifically, it copies no more than 1024 characters (tested both > > on 4.2-RELEASE and 4.4-RELEASE (fill one of your virtual consoles with text, > > then select all screen, then switch to another console, start "cat >file" > > and paste the text, then press ^D twice - you'll see that file size will be no > > more than 1024). > > I know about this. I asked when this bug will be fixed? > Who can do it? Simple question: Do you (does somebody else) have a fix available? If not, do you feel like researching the problem (you obviously run against the limit and can see if your modification fixes things for you and maybe others) and providing a solution by submitting a PR? To help you to helping yourself: Did you have a look at the above mentioned scmouse.c source file, especially its sc_alloc_cut_buffer() routine? I just had a look at rev 1.12.2.3 (was -STABLE at the end of March and still should be the current rev IIRC). And I cannot see where the limit you experienced should come from. Except when the used M_DEVBUF type has an artificial limit. But the malloc(9) manpage doesn't give a hint towards this and even more suggests that the whole "size" bytes could be allocated when non NULL pointers are returned. And I don't believe in the artificial 1K limit in the kernel's malloc() function (`vmstat -m` has bigger buckets as well). I would guess that the 1024 byte limit you mention above is located somewhere else. It could be some timing issues (I've seen terminals being overwhelmed when you "type this fast") or pipe dimension. Did you try some `wc` on the pasted text? Did you syslog() or printf() the malloc() parameters in sc_alloc_cut_buffer()? Did you look at the sc_paste() routine if p (the cut_buffer) holds all the data, count characterizes them well but the l_rint callback doesn't take them all or the rmap table does something weird? (Although a quick look at syscons.c makes me think the latter questions are pure speculation.) The only bug I would expect in the sc_alloc_cut_buffer() logic is that when you fill the whole screen (menus? windowed UIs?) and put all the content _plus_ the newlines into the cut buffer, you cannot hold all the data in a buffer of the screen's dimension. So the size calculation (in the "do I have to reallocate?" test as well as in the "so many bytes is what I need" determination) maybe should read cut_buffer_size = (scp->xsize + 1) * scp->ysize + 1; So the buffer could hold - all the characters which fit on one line plus the newline - times the line count in height - plus the terminating NUL character for the C string But apart from all of this I get the feeling that you misuse the clipboard in some way when you have the need to copy (almost) whole screens. Are you actually looking for some screen shot software (like vidcontrol(8)'s -p or -P and the scr2txt or scr2png converters) or a file transfer utility? :) virtually yours 82D1 9B9C 01DC 4FB4 D7B4 61BE 3F49 4F77 72DE DA76 Gerhard Sittig true | mail -s "get gpg key" Gerhard.Sittig@gmx.net -- If you don't understand or are scared by any of the above ask your parents or an adult to help you. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 11:25:54 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rwcrmhc53.attbi.com (rwcrmhc53.attbi.com [204.127.198.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D4D637B406 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 11:25:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from blossom.cjclark.org ([12.234.91.48]) by rwcrmhc53.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020508182546.EXDA22408.rwcrmhc53.attbi.com@blossom.cjclark.org>; Wed, 8 May 2002 18:25:46 +0000 Received: (from cjc@localhost) by blossom.cjclark.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g48IPkC94767; Wed, 8 May 2002 11:25:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from cjc) Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 11:25:46 -0700 From: "Crist J. Clark" To: Sheldon Hearn Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: installworld broken from read-only NFS /usr/obj Message-ID: <20020508112546.D94469@blossom.cjclark.org> References: <7303.1020784991@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <7303.1020784991@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za>; from sheldonh@starjuice.net on Tue, May 07, 2002 at 05:23:11PM +0200 X-URL: http://people.freebsd.org/~cjc/ Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, May 07, 2002 at 05:23:11PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > Hi folks, > > I routinely run 'make installworld' from a read-only NFS-mounted > /usr/src, using a read-only NFS-mounted /usr/obj . This allows me to > perform builds on a non-production box and then upgrade all my servers > from its obj tree. > > The last time I did this was a couple of weeks ago and it worked. Now I > get the following error: > > make installworld > ... > ===> gnu/usr.bin/perl/library/SDBM_File > cd sdbm && make all > rm -rf libsdbm.a > rm: libsdbm.a: Read-only file system > *** Error code 1 > > If I use 'make -i', it is evident that this isn't all such errors are in > the src/gnu/usr.bin/perl/library tree, but this is the first one > encountered. > > It looks like the installworld target causes an attempted write to the > obj tree, which is naughty. > > Any ideas? Check the clocks. The Perl build is known for extreme temporal sensitivity. The 'installworld' will try to rebuild things that were built in the 'buildworld' because it thinks the targets are out of date. -- Crist J. Clark | cjclark@alum.mit.edu | cjclark@jhu.edu http://people.freebsd.org/~cjc/ | cjc@freebsd.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 12: 8:51 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from samson.sentinelchicken.net (dsl-pb-5965.linkline.com [64.30.196.222]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7392437B400 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 12:08:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 41975 invoked by uid 1001); 8 May 2002 18:15:56 -0000 Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 11:15:56 -0700 From: Jason Morgan To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: XFree86-4-libraries wont build Message-ID: <20020508111556.A40089@samson.sentinelchicken.net> References: <3CD8C15B.8020201@quake.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <3CD8C15B.8020201@quake.com.au>; from kaltorak@quake.com.au on Wed, May 08, 2002 at 04:10:35PM +1000 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm also have problems with building XFree86-4. It is a newly installed system, however, I have had XF86-4 installed on it in the past. I was wondering if anyone out there could help. My specific problem is with XFree86-4 fontEncodings. The details are as follows. Details ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- make ===> Extracting for XFree86-fontEncodings-4.2.0 >> Checksum OK for xc/X420src-2.tgz. ===> XFree86-fontEncodings-4.2.0 depends on executable: mkfontdir - found ===> XFree86-fontEncodings-4.2.0 depends on executable: imake - found ===> XFree86-fontEncodings-4.2.0 depends on shared library: X11.6 - found ===> Patching for XFree86-fontEncodings-4.2.0 ===> Configuring for XFree86-fontEncodings-4.2.0 (cd /usr/ports/x11-fonts/XFree86-4-fontEncodings/work/xc/fonts/encodings && ima ke -DUseInstalled -DProjectRoot=/usr/X11R6 -I/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/config -DTOPDIR =../../.. -DCURDIR=.; make Makefiles ; make includes ; make depend) making Makefiles in large... including in ./large... depending in ./large... ===> Building for XFree86-fontEncodings-4.2.0 making all in ./large... cat big5.eten-0.enc | gzip > big5.eten-0.enc.gz cat gb2312.1980-0.enc | gzip > gb2312.1980-0.enc.gz cat gbk-0.enc | gzip > gbk-0.enc.gz cat jisx0201.1976-0.enc | gzip > jisx0201.1976-0.enc.gz cat jisx0208.1983-0.enc | gzip > jisx0208.1983-0.enc.gz cat jisx0208.1990-0.enc | gzip > jisx0208.1990-0.enc.gz cat jisx0212.1990-0.enc | gzip > jisx0212.1990-0.enc.gz cat ksc5601.1987-0.enc | gzip > ksc5601.1987-0.enc.gz cat ksc5601.1992-3.enc | gzip > ksc5601.1992-3.enc.gz rm -f DONE touch DONE rm -f encodings.dir fonts.dir + /usr/X11R6/bin/mkfontdir -r -p /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/encodings/large/ -e . . /usr/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/X11R6/bin/mkfontdir: Undefined symbol "FontEncIdentify" *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-fonts/XFree86-4-fontEncodings/work/xc/fonts/encodings/lar ge. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-fonts/XFree86-4-fontEncodings/work/xc/fonts/encodings. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/x11-fonts/XFree86-4-fontEncodings. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Any suggestions? Jasom Morgan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 13:18:49 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from out009.verizon.net (out009pub.verizon.net [206.46.170.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A0B37B9EC for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 13:15:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Pentium166 ([4.33.1.132]) by out009.verizon.net (InterMail vM.5.01.04.05 201-253-122-122-105-20011231) with SMTP id <20020508200556.PCPW25935.out009.verizon.net@Pentium166>; Wed, 8 May 2002 15:05:56 -0500 Message-ID: <00d301c1f6cb$421bd9c0$0201a8c0@Pentium166> From: "Leland" To: "Cedric Ware" , "Vladimir G. Drobyshevsky" Cc: References: <129604079.20020425142210@telecom.ural.ru> <20020425103627.A14146@enst.fr> Subject: Re: FreeBSD security hole? Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 13:02:17 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Indeed, see security advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:23.stdio at: > ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-02:23.stdio.asc > > Please upgrade to 4.5-p4 or 4-STABLE (April 21 or after). Done the Google BSD looking for variation on ISO of 4.5-RELEASE-p4, can't seem to find it on FreeBSD.org either. Is an ISO of 4.5-RELEASE-p4 out there?? Thanks. Leland To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 13:47:24 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from peitho.fxp.org (peitho.fxp.org [209.26.95.40]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B46C37C049 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 13:43:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by peitho.fxp.org (Postfix, from userid 1501) id B080813677; Wed, 8 May 2002 16:43:51 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 16:43:51 -0400 From: Chris Faulhaber To: Leland Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD security hole? Message-ID: <20020508204351.GB87923@peitho.fxp.org> Mail-Followup-To: Chris Faulhaber , Leland , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <129604079.20020425142210@telecom.ural.ru> <20020425103627.A14146@enst.fr> <00d301c1f6cb$421bd9c0$0201a8c0@Pentium166> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hHWLQfXTYDoKhP50" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <00d301c1f6cb$421bd9c0$0201a8c0@Pentium166> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --hHWLQfXTYDoKhP50 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 01:02:17PM -0700, Leland wrote: > > Indeed, see security advisory FreeBSD-SA-02:23.stdio at: > > > ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-02:23.stdio.= asc > > > > Please upgrade to 4.5-p4 or 4-STABLE (April 21 or after). >=20 > Done the Google BSD looking for variation on ISO of 4.5-RELEASE-p4, > can't seem to find it on FreeBSD.org either. >=20 > Is an ISO of 4.5-RELEASE-p4 out there?? >=20 snapshots.jp.freebsd.org has both an ISO and ftp-installable -p4: ftp://snapshots.jp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/ ftp://snapshots.jp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/4.5-RELEASE-p4/ --=20 Chris D. Faulhaber - jedgar@fxp.org - jedgar@FreeBSD.org -------------------------------------------------------- FreeBSD: The Power To Serve - http://www.FreeBSD.org --hHWLQfXTYDoKhP50 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD) Comment: FreeBSD: The Power To Serve iD8DBQE82Y4HObaG4P6BelARAqGFAJ9x/RCrNV5vA8A6hCjfwoD+VoTSnACeOe5P I5EyH5oj+5XzixvQqP8hA4c= =9TLS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hHWLQfXTYDoKhP50-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 14:45:46 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from TheWorld.com (pcls3.std.com [199.172.62.105]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7802537B406 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 14:45:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shell.TheWorld.com (pciszek@shell01.TheWorld.com [199.172.62.241]) by TheWorld.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA31674; Wed, 8 May 2002 17:45:29 -0400 Received: (from kwc@localhost) by shell.TheWorld.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA1562929; Wed, 8 May 2002 17:45:29 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 17:45:29 -0400 (EDT) From: Kenneth W Cochran Message-Id: <200205082145.RAA1562929@shell.TheWorld.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: xchat segfaulting in -stable Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello -stable, I track -stable roughly weekly & since my cvsup/build/install of Wednesday, May 1, & subsequently today, Wednesday May 8, xchat has been segfaulting on connection to most (but not all) servers. Previously to May 1, (well, previously to May 3) xchat has never been any trouble & I'm wondering if this may somehow be OS-related. Ports-tree is current as of cvsup, as are any dependencies/libraries, with the exception of X, which is 4.1.0_10; so far I'm finding 4.2.0 quite painful to build/install. Any ideas as to how to troubleshoot & fix this? Many thanks, -kc To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 17:50:52 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from the.oneinsane.net (the.oneinsane.net [66.42.61.25]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 085EA37B401 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 17:50:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: from moria.bsdguru.com (gandalf.bsdguru.com [216.231.55.200]) by the.oneinsane.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6880B1568A for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 17:50:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by moria.bsdguru.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3139444E; Wed, 8 May 2002 17:50:35 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 17:50:35 -0700 From: Ben Lovett To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: installworld fail on -stable (gnu/usr.bin/groff/font/devascii) Message-ID: <20020509005035.GA11257@bsdguru.com> Mail-Followup-To: Ben Lovett , stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i X-Moon: The Moon is Waning Crescent (11% of Full) X-GPG-Key: http://www.bsdguru.com/~blovett/blovett.pgp X-GPG-Fingerprint: C75F A722 1518 03B8 26C3 77A1 7C76 8AFA EBAB 2004 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD moria 4.5-STABLE X-Uptime: 5:49PM up 6:45, 8 users, load averages: 0.01, 0.05, 0.01 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Anyone seen this today? ===> gnu/usr.bin/groff/font/devX75-12 install -c -o root -g wheel -m 444 /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/font/devX75-12/.. /../../../../contrib/groff/font/devX75-12/DESC /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/font/d evX75-12/../../../../../contrib/groff/font/devX75-12/TR /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/gro ff/font/devX75-12/../../../../../contrib/groff/font/devX75-12/TI /usr/src/gnu/us r.bin/groff/font/devX75-12/../../../../../contrib/groff/font/devX75-12/TB /usr/s rc/gnu/usr.bin/groff/font/devX75-12/../../../../../contrib/groff/font/devX75-12/ TBI /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/font/devX75-12/../../../../../contrib/groff/font/ devX75-12/CR /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/font/devX75-12/../../../../../contrib/gr off/font/devX75-12/CI /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/font/devX75-12/../../../../../c ontrib/groff/font/devX75-12/CB /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/font/devX75-12/../../. ./../../contrib/groff/font/devX75-12/CBI /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/font/devX75- 12/../../../../../contrib/groff/font/devX75-12/HR /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/fon t/devX75-12/../../../../../contrib/groff/font/devX75-12/HI /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/ groff/font/devX75-12/../../../../../contrib/groff/font/devX75-12/HB /usr/src/gnu /usr.bin/groff/font/devX75-12/../../../../../contrib/groff/font/devX75-12/HBI /u sr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/font/devX75-12/../../../../../contrib/groff/font/devX75 -12/NR /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/font/devX75-12/../../../../../contrib/groff/fo nt/devX75-12/NI /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/font/devX75-12/../../../../../contrib /groff/font/devX75-12/NB /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/font/devX75-12/../../../../. ./contrib/groff/font/devX75-12/NBI /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/font/devX75-12/../ ../../../../contrib/groff/font/devX75-12/S /usr/share/groff_font/devX75-12 ===> gnu/usr.bin/groff/font/devascii Making R expr: not found *** Error code 127 Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/font/devascii. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff/font. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin/groff. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/gnu/usr.bin. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/gnu. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 -ben To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 18:16:24 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.sandvine.com (sandvine.com [209.167.74.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78C5B37B413 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 18:16:08 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail.sandvine.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 8 May 2002 21:16:07 -0400 Message-ID: From: Don Bowman To: "'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" Subject: tens of thousands of ip aliases Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 21:16:07 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm working on an application where I am using a pair of FreeBSD 4.5 boxes to simulate a much larger network, with a device under test between them. I need to simulate 10K's of IP addresses (actually, I would like to do 100K's and higher, but am willing to use more than one PC to get there). On the 'server' side, this seems to be possible using an ipfw fwd rule with no other special setup. On the 'client' side, there seems to be nothing as simple as this. As a test, I created ~36K if aliases (using ifconfig alias). I found this got slower and slower as I went along. THe first ~8K or so went reasonly quickly, but I was able to go to dinner and come back and it was still chewing on the remainder. Q. Will the performance of this many aliases be ok? Q. Is there another way to simulate an arbitrary source IP (in the same way ipfw fwd can respond to an arbitrary dest IP)? Ideally I could specify for each socket I create with a setsockopt or ioctl the source IP to use. This is ignoring routing rules etc. --don To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 18:24:57 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from wwweasel.geeksrus.net (wwweasel.geeksrus.net [64.8.210.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63BE537B400 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 18:24:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wwweasel.geeksrus.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wwweasel.geeksrus.net (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g491RHuo043941 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 21:27:17 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from alane@wwweasel.geeksrus.net) Received: (from alane@localhost) by wwweasel.geeksrus.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g491RHJB043940 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 8 May 2002 21:27:17 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 21:27:17 -0400 From: Alan E To: FreeBSD Stable List Subject: /var/spool/{mqueue,clientmqueue} and 'mailq' Message-ID: <20020509012717.GA43918@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i X-message-flag: Magic 8-Ball says "Outlook not so good." I'll ask it about Exchange next. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I just can seem to find any docs that explain to me why (1) no bounces or warnings ever get sent when stuff gets stuck in /var/spool/clientmqueue, and (3) why mailq only tells me about /var/spool/mqueue. I did a binary upgrade to 20020420-STABLE via an iso and everything else is working just fine. -- AlanE To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 18:34:45 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from topaz.mdcc.cx (topaz.mdcc.cx [212.204.230.141]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1733737B496 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 18:33:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from k7.mavetju.org (topaz.mdcc.cx [212.204.230.141]) by topaz.mdcc.cx (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F9A22B6AE; Thu, 9 May 2002 03:33:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: by k7.mavetju.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7915A5A0; Thu, 9 May 2002 11:34:01 +1000 (EST) Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 11:34:01 +1000 From: Edwin Groothuis To: Don Bowman Cc: "'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: tens of thousands of ip aliases Message-ID: <20020509113401.G56548@k7.mavetju.org> Mail-Followup-To: Edwin Groothuis , Don Bowman , "'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i In-Reply-To: ; from don@sandvine.com on Wed, May 08, 2002 at 09:16:07PM -0400 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 09:16:07PM -0400, Don Bowman wrote: > I'm working on an application where I am using a pair > of FreeBSD 4.5 boxes to simulate a much larger network, > with a device under test between them. > > I need to simulate 10K's of IP addresses (actually, I would > like to do 100K's and higher, but am willing to use more > than one PC to get there). > > On the 'server' side, this seems to be possible using > an ipfw fwd rule with no other special setup. > > On the 'client' side, there seems to be nothing as simple as > this. As a test, I created ~36K if aliases (using ifconfig alias). > I found this got slower and slower as I went along. THe first > ~8K or so went reasonly quickly, but I was able to go to > dinner and come back and it was still chewing on the remainder. Personally, I wouldn't do this with aliases (specially not with the amount you needed) but with simulating the network traffic via libpcap and libnet. Yes you would have to write your own IP stack to keep track of and to act on the packets, but you will not have the limitations of the operating system. And it will even be portable :-) Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.MavEtJu.org edwin@mavetju.org | Interested in MUDs? Visit Fatal Dimensions: bash$ :(){ :|:&};: | http://www.FatalDimensions.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 18:38:21 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.sandvine.com (sandvine.com [209.167.74.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68AB337B403 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 18:38:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail.sandvine.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Wed, 8 May 2002 21:38:16 -0400 Message-ID: From: Don Bowman To: "'freebsd-stable@freebsd.org'" Subject: RE: tens of thousands of ip aliases Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 21:38:16 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 09:34:07PM -0400, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 09:16:07PM -0400, Don Bowman wrote: > > I'm working on an application where I am using a pair > > of FreeBSD 4.5 boxes to simulate a much larger network, > > with a device under test between them. > > Personally, I wouldn't do this with aliases (specially not with the > amount you needed) but with simulating the network traffic via > libpcap and libnet. Yes you would have to write your own IP stack > to keep track of and to act on the packets, but you will not have > the limitations of the operating system. Yes, good suggestion, I'm already doing that as well. I have bound libpcap into TCL, and have written a class library in ITCL to allow contructing arbitrary packets. This works well, and can achieve the scale I need. I also need to have TCP behaviour and flows, which is very difficult to do without reinventing the network stack. I need to be able to simulate standard network clients (eg browsers, etc.) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 18:54:13 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (castle.jp.FreeBSD.org [210.226.20.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C96537B413 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 18:54:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [::1]) by castle.jp.FreeBSD.org (8.11.6+3.4W/8.11.3) with ESMTP/inet6 id g491rwf70444 for ; Thu, 9 May 2002 10:53:58 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org) In-Reply-To: <20020507020339N.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> References: <200205052131.g45LVYx60743@drugs.dv.isc.org> <20020506130953S.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> <20020507020339N.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> X-User-Agent: Mew/1.94.2 XEmacs/21.5 (bamboo) X-FaceAnim: (-O_O-)(O_O- )(_O- )(O- )(- -)( -O)( -O_)( -O_O)(-O_O-) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Dispatcher: imput version 20000228(IM140) Lines: 10 From: Makoto Matsushita To: stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: BIND in -stable Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 10:53:56 +0900 Message-Id: <20020509105356M.matusita@jp.FreeBSD.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG matusita> I've contacted ISC directly, and found that 8.3.2 will be released matusita> real soon (yes, real soon). BIND 8.3.2-T1B is now released. -- - Makoto `MAR' Matsushita To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 19:59:40 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from snoopy.gwr.com (snoopy.gwr.com [198.88.88.198]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1841637B400 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 19:59:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=rune ident=[1FLUYpXCa+aJStxlMf1NF2IHoSer+4u3]) by snoopy.gwr.com with smtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 175eDD-00066e-00; Wed, 08 May 2002 23:03:23 -0400 From: "Arun Welch" To: "Don Bowman" , Subject: RE: tens of thousands of ip aliases Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 21:58:53 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 In-Reply-To: Importance: Normal Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG >=20 > I need to simulate 10K's of IP addresses (actually, I would > like to do 100K's and higher, but am willing to use more > than one PC to get there). >=20 You might want to take a look that what the folks who've written the = Web Polygraph cache test kit (polygraph.ircache.net) have done. If = memory serves you can generate tests simulating large numbers of = clients. It's been about 3 years since I've played with it, but the = default setup used to use 10/8 as the initial source, so things have = probably evolved from there. It was pretty FreeBSD-centric (in fact the = recommended delay simulator was Dummynet). ...arun To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 20:33:28 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from horsey.gshapiro.net (horsey.gshapiro.net [209.220.147.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 516D837B407 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 20:33:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: from horsey.gshapiro.net (gshapiro@localhost [IPv6:::1]) by horsey.gshapiro.net (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g493XMSd045350 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 8 May 2002 20:33:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gshapiro@localhost) by horsey.gshapiro.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g493XMLX045347; Wed, 8 May 2002 20:33:22 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15577.60930.577722.682790@horsey.gshapiro.net> Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 20:33:22 -0700 From: Gregory Neil Shapiro To: Alan E Cc: FreeBSD Stable List Subject: Re: /var/spool/{mqueue,clientmqueue} and 'mailq' In-Reply-To: <20020509012717.GA43918@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> References: <20020509012717.GA43918@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> X-Mailer: VM 7.00 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG alane> I just can seem to find any docs that explain to me why Start with /etc/mail/README. alane> (1) no bounces or warnings ever get sent when stuff gets stuck in alane> /var/spool/clientmqueue, and Assuming you haven't turned off: sendmail_msp_queue_enable="YES" # Dequeue stuck clientmqueue mail (YES/NO). in /etc/rc.conf, "stuck" items should get tried every half hour. If they aren't getting out a bounce will be generated. But if mail can't get out, the bounces probably can't either. alane> (3) why mailq only tells me about /var/spool/mqueue. See the mailq man page: mailq -Ac They are also reported in the nightly periodic mailings. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 21: 2:39 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from wwweasel.geeksrus.net (wwweasel.geeksrus.net [64.8.210.226]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E9F37B40F; Wed, 8 May 2002 21:02:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from wwweasel.geeksrus.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wwweasel.geeksrus.net (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g4944vY9074730; Thu, 9 May 2002 00:04:57 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from alane@wwweasel.geeksrus.net) Received: (from alane@localhost) by wwweasel.geeksrus.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g4944urC074729; Thu, 9 May 2002 00:04:56 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 00:04:56 -0400 From: Alan E To: Gregory Neil Shapiro Cc: FreeBSD Stable List Subject: Re: /var/spool/{mqueue,clientmqueue} and 'mailq' Message-ID: <20020509040456.GA68030@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> References: <20020509012717.GA43918@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> <15577.60930.577722.682790@horsey.gshapiro.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <15577.60930.577722.682790@horsey.gshapiro.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.99i X-message-flag: Magic 8-Ball says "Outlook not so good." I'll ask it about Exchange next. Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 08:33:22PM -0700, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: >alane> I just can seem to find any docs that explain to me why > >Start with /etc/mail/README. Indeed I did. >alane> (1) no bounces or warnings ever get sent when stuff gets stuck in >alane> /var/spool/clientmqueue, and > >Assuming you haven't turned off: >sendmail_msp_queue_enable="YES" # Dequeue stuck clientmqueue mail (YES/NO). > >in /etc/rc.conf, "stuck" items should get tried every half hour. If they >aren't getting out a bounce will be generated. But if mail can't get out, >the bounces probably can't either. Shouldn't I get a warning locally? Mail that's stuck there (has been stuck there) has been because of a failed DNS lookup on the target host. > >alane> (3) why mailq only tells me about /var/spool/mqueue. > >See the mailq man page: > >mailq -Ac MAILQ(1) MAILQ(1) NAME mailq - print the mail queue SYNOPSIS mailq [-v] [alane ~/SYSCONF/usr/local/etc/apache]$ find /usr/share/man/ -name mailq* -ls 1783570 4 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1153 Apr 19 20:01 /usr/share/man/man1/mailq.1.gz 1805193 4 -rw-r--r-- 1 man wheel 1005 Apr 20 16:32 /usr/share/man/cat1/mailq.1.gz -- AlanE To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 21: 5:33 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from horsey.gshapiro.net (horsey.gshapiro.net [209.220.147.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C32D37B408 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 21:05:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from horsey.gshapiro.net (gshapiro@localhost [IPv6:::1]) by horsey.gshapiro.net (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g4945SSd045677 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 8 May 2002 21:05:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from gshapiro@localhost) by horsey.gshapiro.net (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g4945SxG045674; Wed, 8 May 2002 21:05:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <15577.62856.171929.78883@horsey.gshapiro.net> Date: Wed, 8 May 2002 21:05:28 -0700 From: Gregory Neil Shapiro To: Alan E Cc: FreeBSD Stable List Subject: Re: /var/spool/{mqueue,clientmqueue} and 'mailq' In-Reply-To: <20020509040456.GA68030@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> References: <20020509012717.GA43918@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> <15577.60930.577722.682790@horsey.gshapiro.net> <20020509040456.GA68030@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> X-Mailer: VM 7.00 under 21.1 (patch 14) "Cuyahoga Valley" XEmacs Lucid Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG alane> Shouldn't I get a warning locally? Mail that's stuck there (has been alane> stuck there) has been because of a failed DNS lookup on the target host. All local mail must go through an MTA. I don't know the specifics of your situation so I can't tell you why you didn't see them. Perhaps looking at your mail logs will help you determine why you didn't (don't send them to the mailing list). alane> (3) why mailq only tells me about /var/spool/mqueue. >> >> See the mailq man page: >> >> mailq -Ac alane> 1783570 4 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel 1153 alane> Apr 19 20:01 /usr/share/man/man1/mailq.1.gz The change was checked in April 28th. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 22: 8:47 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rwcrmhc54.attbi.com (rwcrmhc54.attbi.com [216.148.227.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DB6537B40A for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 22:08:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mac.com ([12.231.115.57]) by rwcrmhc54.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020509050844.WSK25765.rwcrmhc54.attbi.com@mac.com> for ; Thu, 9 May 2002 05:08:44 +0000 Message-ID: <3CDA045A.1060504@mac.com> Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 22:08:42 -0700 From: paul beard User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.0rc1) Gecko/20020429 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: question on dump(8) and SCSI tape drive Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I just installed a DDS-2 tape drive (Archive/Seagate Peregrine with HW compression) and want to do some backups. From what I can tell, a 120m tape should hold 4 Gb of uncompressed data and 8 Gb compressed. I'm puzzled why dump(8) wants 2 tapes to backup 77+ Mb of data (the / partition below) and 44% of a tape for /var (16 Mb). DUMP: estimated 77567 tape blocks on 1.99 tape(s). Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad0s1a 99183 77187 14062 85% / /dev/ad0s1f 7302338 3610464 3107687 54% /usr /dev/ad0s1e 19815 15980 2250 88% /var procfs 4 4 0 100% /proc -- Paul Beard 8040 27th Ave NE Seattle WA 98115 206 529 8400 There's no future in time travel To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Wed May 8 22:34:33 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from rwcrmhc52.attbi.com (rwcrmhc52.attbi.com [216.148.227.88]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6842737B410 for ; Wed, 8 May 2002 22:34:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mac.com ([12.231.115.57]) by rwcrmhc52.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020509053424.DSON25294.rwcrmhc52.attbi.com@mac.com> for ; Thu, 9 May 2002 05:34:24 +0000 Message-ID: <3CDA0A5D.6070803@mac.com> Date: Wed, 08 May 2002 22:34:21 -0700 From: paul beard User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; NetBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.0rc1) Gecko/20020429 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: question on dump(8) and SCSI tape drive References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Lawrence S. Lansing wrote: >>I just installed a DDS-2 tape drive (Archive/Seagate Peregrine >>with HW compression) and want to do some backups. From what I can >>tell, a 120m tape should hold 4 Gb of uncompressed data and 8 Gb >>compressed. I'm puzzled why dump(8) wants 2 tapes to backup 77+ Mb >>of data (the / partition below) and 44% of a tape for /var (16 Mb). >> >> DUMP: estimated 77567 tape blocks on 1.99 tape(s). > > > What flags are you giving "dump"? What's the command line you are typing? > I give dump the -a flag: > > -a ``auto-size''. Bypass all tape length considerations, and > enforce writing until an end-of-media indication is returned. > This fits best for most modern tape drives. Use of this option > is particularly recommended when appending to an existing tape, > or using a tape drive with hardware compression (where you can > never be sure about the compression ratio). > > -Larry Lansing That's what I was thinking was the problem (I couldn't make out how dump figured out 44% of what?). Thanks: things seem to be moving more smoothly now. -- Paul Beard 8040 27th Ave NE Seattle WA 98115 206 529 8400 The economy depends about as much on economists as the weather does on weather forecasters. -- Jean-Paul Kauffmann To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu May 9 1:47:24 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from axl.seasidesoftware.co.za (axl.seasidesoftware.co.za [196.31.7.201]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 185D437B404; Thu, 9 May 2002 01:47:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.seasidesoftware.co.za) by axl.seasidesoftware.co.za with local-esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 175ja2-000OR8-00; Thu, 09 May 2002 10:47:18 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: "Crist J. Clark" Cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: installworld broken from read-only NFS /usr/obj In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 08 May 2002 11:25:46 MST." <20020508112546.D94469@blossom.cjclark.org> Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 10:47:18 +0200 Message-ID: <93937.1020934038@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 08 May 2002 11:25:46 MST, "Crist J. Clark" wrote: > Check the clocks. The Perl build is known for extreme temporal > sensitivity. The 'installworld' will try to rebuild things that were > built in the 'buildworld' because it thinks the targets are out of > date. You da man! :-) Sorry for the bogus report; the clock on the NFC client was totally out of whack because the last time I upgraded the machine, I forgot to apply my patch to ntpdate that allows it to bind to a specified IP address! Thanks, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu May 9 3:49:52 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6AFB37B410 for ; Thu, 9 May 2002 03:49:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (marck@localhost) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g49AnRj89618; Thu, 9 May 2002 14:49:31 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 14:49:27 +0400 (MSD) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: rooneg@electricjellyfish.net, Subject: ports/devel/apr-devel broken for last 3 days Message-ID: <20020509133414.V6600-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi there colleagues, devel/apr-devel after maintainer's requested update at Tue May 7 14:52:56 2002 UTC (Version 1.3 of port's Makefile) fails to build if previous version is installed due to incompatibility with headers and early inclusion of old header. Also, this port does not pay attention to $CFLAGS, unconditionally setting them to '-g -O2', which is IIRC against ports policy. I have no patch for this handy, though. Here is the quick fix for includes order (for -stable users, you can put the in files/patch-xxxx). I suppose, all other Maikefile.in's should be patched the same way. --- apr-util/Makefile.in~ Wed Feb 6 20:23:38 2002 +++ apr-util/Makefile.in Thu May 9 13:48:15 2002 @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ srcdir = @srcdir@ VPATH = @srcdir@ -INCLUDES = @APR_INCLUDES@ @APRUTIL_INCLUDES@ @APRUTIL_PRIV_INCLUDES@ +INCLUDES = @APRUTIL_PRIV_INCLUDES@ @APRUTIL_INCLUDES@ @APR_INCLUDES@ TARGET_LIB = libaprutil.la INSTALL_SUBDIRS = @APR_XML_DIR@ --- apr-util/buckets/Makefile.in~ Fri Mar 29 14:29:27 2002 +++ apr-util/buckets/Makefile.in Thu May 9 13:53:18 2002 @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ VPATH = @srcdir@ -INCLUDES = @APR_INCLUDES@ @APRUTIL_INCLUDES@ @APRUTIL_PRIV_INCLUDES@ +INCLUDES = @APRUTIL_PRIV_INCLUDES@ @APRUTIL_INCLUDES@ @APR_INCLUDES@ TARGETS = apr_buckets_file.lo apr_buckets_pool.lo apr_buckets_flush.lo \ apr_buckets_refcount.lo apr_buckets_heap.lo apr_buckets_simple.lo \ Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, DM268-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu May 9 4:52:17 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from smtp0.adl1.internode.on.net (smtp0.adl1.internode.on.net [203.16.214.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B92837B408 for ; Thu, 9 May 2002 04:52:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from midget.dons.net.au (ppp293.sa.adsl.on.net [150.101.244.36]) by smtp0.adl1.internode.on.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g49BpuQ65681 for ; Thu, 9 May 2002 21:21:59 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from localhost (root@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by midget.dons.net.au (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g49BpSUg092256 for ; Thu, 9 May 2002 21:21:31 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Subject: APM Pain From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.3 Date: 09 May 2002 21:21:41 +0930 Message-Id: <1020945104.533.3.camel@chowder.dons.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0 required=5 X-Spam-Level: (0) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.6 (www dot roaringpenguin dot com slash mimedefang) Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I recently updated my laptop to -stable (around the beginning of May). Unfortunately I now can't suspend without crashing during suspend, or on resume :( I have been unable to catch the panic on suspend as it starts suspending, crashes, starts dumping, and then the BIOS turns the power off. On resume it tries to start dumping but panic's again :( If I boot (with a debug kernel) and go single user I get the following [chowder 21:18] ~ >sudo gdb -k /var/crash/*.2 GNU gdb 4.18 Copyright 1998 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i386-unknown-freebsd"... IdlePTD at phsyical address 0x00376000 initial pcb at physical address 0x002834c0 panicstr: page fault panic messages: --- Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode fault virtual address = 0x44 fault code = supervisor read, page not present instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc0c9787f stack pointer = 0x10:0xccc6eab8 frame pointer = 0x10:0xccc6eae4 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 85 (mount_nfs) interrupt mask = none trap number = 12 panic: page fault syncing disks... 24 24 2 2 done Uptime: 2m7s dumping to dev #ad/0x40001, offset 147632 dump ata0: resetting devices .. done 127 126 125 124 123 122 121 120 119 118 117 116 115 114 113 112 111 110 109 108 107 106 105 104 103 102 101 100 99 98 97 96 95 94 93 92 91 90 89 88 87 86 85 84 83 82 81 80 79 78 77 76 75 74 73 72 71 70 69 68 67 66 65 64 63 62 61 60 59 58 57 56 55 54 53 52 51 50 49 48 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 --- #0 dumpsys () at ../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:487 487 if (dumping++) { (kgdb) bt #0 dumpsys () at ../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:487 #1 0xc01527f3 in boot (howto=256) at ../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:316 #2 0xc0152c31 in panic (fmt=0xc02563ac "%s") at ../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:595 #3 0xc02121b3 in trap_fatal (frame=0xccc6ea78, eva=68) at ../../i386/i386/trap.c:966 #4 0xc0211e61 in trap_pfault (frame=0xccc6ea78, usermode=0, eva=68) at ../../i386/i386/trap.c:859 #5 0xc0211a07 in trap (frame={tf_fs = -1071775728, tf_es = -65520, tf_ds = 16, tf_edi = -1061264320, tf_esi = -870019584, tf_ebp = -859378972, tf_isp = -859379036, tf_ebx = -1066040320, tf_edx = 0, tf_ecx = 0, tf_eax = -1061395216, tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 0, tf_eip = -1060538241, tf_cs = 8, tf_eflags = 66134, tf_esp = -870019584, tf_ss = -1061395216}) at ../../i386/i386/trap.c:458 #6 0xc0c9787f in ?? () #7 0xc0c98455 in ?? () #8 0xc0ca1ea1 in ?? () #9 0xc0ca24fb in ?? () #10 0xc0ca1935 in ?? () #11 0xc0ca171d in ?? () #12 0xc01827cb in mount (p=0xc7c2b5a0, uap=0xccc6ef80) at ../../kern/vfs_syscalls.c:314 #13 0xc0212469 in syscall2 (frame={tf_fs = 47, tf_es = 47, tf_ds = 47, tf_edi = -1077937344, tf_esi = 134687640, tf_ebp = -1077937256, tf_isp = -859377708, tf_ebx = -1077938400, tf_edx = 0, tf_ecx = 0, tf_eax = 21, tf_trapno = 7, tf_err = 2, tf_eip = 134522624, tf_cs = 31, tf_eflags = 582, tf_esp = -1077938500, tf_ss = 47}) at ../../i386/i386/trap.c:1167 #14 0xc0205855 in Xint0x80_syscall () #15 0x8048135 in ?? () [chowder 21:20] ~ >kldstat Id Refs Address Size Name 1 15 0xc0100000 1f57d0 kernel 2 1 0xc02f6000 d7a8 if_wi.ko 3 1 0xc0304000 8c90 snd_maestro3.ko 4 1 0xc030d000 18650 snd_pcm.ko 5 1 0xc0326000 1e4f4 usb.ko 6 1 0xc0345000 5104 ugen.ko 7 1 0xc034b000 3d6c ums.ko 8 1 0xc034f000 a488 agp.ko 9 1 0xc0c47000 d000 msdos.ko 10 1 0xc0c75000 6000 procfs.ko 11 1 0xc0c7e000 7000 linprocfs.ko 12 1 0xc0cd4000 8000 if_fxp.ko 13 1 0xc0cdd000 e000 miibus.ko 14 1 0xc0d04000 4d000 nfs.ko 15 1 0xc0e64000 14000 linux.ko I'm more than happy to run tests etc if someone wants a victim^Wtester.. I'll be twiddling my thumbs doing a binary source search if you want to help :) -- Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 9A8C 569F 685A D928 5140 AE4B 319B 41F4 5D17 FDD5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu May 9 5:17:41 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from isris.pair.com (isris.pair.com [209.68.2.39]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 248AC37B405 for ; Thu, 9 May 2002 05:17:36 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 66468 invoked by uid 3130); 9 May 2002 12:17:34 -0000 Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 08:17:34 -0400 From: Garrett Rooney To: Dmitry Morozovsky Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/devel/apr-devel broken for last 3 days Message-ID: <20020509121734.GA66106@electricjellyfish.net> References: <20020509133414.V6600-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020509133414.V6600-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 02:49:27PM +0400, Dmitry Morozovsky wrote: > Hi there colleagues, > > devel/apr-devel after maintainer's requested update at Tue May 7 14:52:56 > 2002 UTC (Version 1.3 of port's Makefile) fails to build if previous > version is installed due to incompatibility with headers and early > inclusion of old header. > > Also, this port does not pay attention to $CFLAGS, unconditionally setting > them to '-g -O2', which is IIRC against ports policy. I have no patch for > this handy, though. > > Here is the quick fix for includes order (for -stable users, you can put > the in files/patch-xxxx). I suppose, all other Maikefile.in's should be > patched the same way. hi there. i came up with a better fix for the includes order problem yesterday and sent it off to roberto@freebsd.org, since he's the person who normally commits these things for me. well, it's the same fix, it just doesn't require all the patches. here's the patch for the makefile. (btw, this has already been fixed in the upstream sources.) thanks for letting me know about the CFLAGS problem. i will look into it as soon as i get the chance. -garrett Index: Makefile =================================================================== --- Makefile +++ tmp.37140.00001 Thu May 9 08:08:57 2002 @@ -25,6 +25,9 @@ ${SH} pkg-install apr-devel PRE-INSTALL pre-configure: + (find ${WRKDIR}/apr-util/ -name Makefile.in -exec \ + ${PERL} -pi -e 's/\@APRUTIL_INCLUDES\@ \@APRUTIL_PRIV_INCLUDES\@/\@APRUTIL_PRIV_INCLUDES\@ \@APRUTIL_INCLUDES\@/g' \{\} \;) + (cd ${WRKDIR}/apr/ && ./buildconf) (cd ${WRKDIR}/apr-util/ && ./buildconf) -- garrett rooney Remember, any design flaw you're rooneg@electricjellyfish.net sufficiently snide about becomes http://electricjellyfish.net/ a feature. -- Dan Sugalski To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu May 9 5:19:31 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from sage-one.net (adsl-65-71-135-137.dsl.crchtx.swbell.net [65.71.135.137]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C840A37B40C; Thu, 9 May 2002 05:19:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from SAGEONE (sageone [192.168.0.5]) by sage-one.net (8.11.6/8.11.6) with SMTP id g49CJJb70110; Thu, 9 May 2002 07:19:19 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from jackstone@sage-one.net) Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.20020509071919.011c7318@mail.sage-one.net> X-Sender: jackstone@mail.sage-one.net X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 07:19:19 -0500 To: Alan E , Gregory Neil Shapiro From: "Jack L. Stone" Subject: Re: /var/spool/{mqueue,clientmqueue} and 'mailq' Cc: FreeBSD Stable List In-Reply-To: <20020509040456.GA68030@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> References: <15577.60930.577722.682790@horsey.gshapiro.net> <20020509012717.GA43918@wwweasel.geeksrus.net> <15577.60930.577722.682790@horsey.gshapiro.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 12:04 AM 5.9.2002 -0400, Alan E wrote: >On Wed, May 08, 2002 at 08:33:22PM -0700, Gregory Neil Shapiro wrote: >>alane> I just can seem to find any docs that explain to me why >> >>Start with /etc/mail/README. > >Indeed I did. > >>alane> (1) no bounces or warnings ever get sent when stuff gets stuck in >>alane> /var/spool/clientmqueue, and >> >>Assuming you haven't turned off: >>sendmail_msp_queue_enable="YES" # Dequeue stuck clientmqueue mail (YES/NO). >> >>in /etc/rc.conf, "stuck" items should get tried every half hour. If they >>aren't getting out a bounce will be generated. But if mail can't get out, >>the bounces probably can't either. > >Shouldn't I get a warning locally? Mail that's stuck there (has been >stuck there) has been because of a failed DNS lookup on the target host. >> >>alane> (3) why mailq only tells me about /var/spool/mqueue. >> >>See the mailq man page: >> >>mailq -Ac > >MAILQ(1) MAILQ(1) > > > >NAME > mailq - print the mail queue > > SYNOPSIS > mailq [-v] > > ...a further question I have that I don't see in the mailq man pages is how to kill the remaining part of a majordomo mailing where the system wants to keeping trying to deliver some stale-addressed remaining emails for up to 5 days. These emails will never be delivered because the address have become stale. I have removed them from the mail list so they won;t be there at the next mailing, but, the mqueue is still trying to deliver them needlessly. That queue was uselful in shwoing the bad addresses, but need to be purged.... but how...??? .... our website: http://www.sage-one.net/ Best regards, Jack L. Stone Server Admin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu May 9 5:31: 4 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from tara.freenix.org (keltia.freenix.org [62.4.20.87]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 077E737B40C for ; Thu, 9 May 2002 05:31:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by tara.freenix.org (Postfix/TLS, from userid 101) id B3D172C9A; Thu, 9 May 2002 14:30:58 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 14:30:58 +0200 From: Ollivier Robert To: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/devel/apr-devel broken for last 3 days Message-ID: <20020509123058.GA99599@tara.freenix.org> Mail-Followup-To: stable@freebsd.org References: <20020509133414.V6600-100000@woozle.rinet.ru> <20020509121734.GA66106@electricjellyfish.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020509121734.GA66106@electricjellyfish.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT K6-3D/266 & 2x PIII/800 SMP Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG According to Garrett Rooney: > yesterday and sent it off to roberto@freebsd.org, since he's the > person who normally commits these things for me. well, it's the same > fix, it just doesn't require all the patches. here's the patch for I just committed the fix Garrett sent me. Please cvsup and check. -- Ollivier ROBERT -=- FreeBSD: The Power to Serve! -=- roberto@keltia.freenix.fr FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 5.0-CURRENT #80: Sun Jun 4 22:44:19 CEST 2000 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu May 9 5:34:29 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from back2.mail.megapathdsl.net (back2.mail.megapathdsl.net [66.80.60.36]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F5837B411 for ; Thu, 9 May 2002 05:34:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [216.83.188.5] (account ) by back2.mail.megapathdsl.net (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 3.5.8) with HTTP id 3642714; Thu, 09 May 2002 05:34:27 -0700 From: Jamil Taylor Subject: Re: XFree86-4-libraries wont build (fixed) To: Kent Stewart , jreynold@sedona.ch.intel.com Cc: freebsd-stable X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro Web Mailer v.3.5.8 Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 05:34:27 -0700 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <3CD96436.7040506@owt.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I rebuilt the imake-4.2.0 port, and the XFree86-4.2.0 meta-port was successfully built. It appears that imake-4.2.0 is included as a dependency for this, so I found it odd to have to do this. However, it works, and my Radeon 8500 is working as good as my old Matrox G400 was. Thanks again. On Wed, 08 May 2002 10:45:26 -0700 Kent Stewart wrote: >Did you rebuild imake-4.2.0? I had no problems building all of >XFree86-4.2.0 last night but I started with fresh >dependancies. > >Kent To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu May 9 5:46:20 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from HAL9000.wox.org (12-232-222-90.client.attbi.com [12.232.222.90]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF43337B415 for ; Thu, 9 May 2002 05:46:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from das@localhost) by HAL9000.wox.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g49CkhZ37442; Thu, 9 May 2002 05:46:43 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from das) Date: Thu, 9 May 2002 05:46:43 -0700 From: David Schultz To: Dmitry Pryanishnikov Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: buffer size Message-ID: <20020509054643.A37350@HAL9000.wox.org> Mail-Followup-To: Dmitry Pryanishnikov , freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG References: <20020508011556.A28420@HAL9000.wox.org> <20020508113620.K26619-100000@atlantis.dp.ua> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20020508113620.K26619-100000@atlantis.dp.ua>; from dmitry@atlantis.dp.ua on Wed, May 08, 2002 at 11:41:56AM +0300 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Thus spake Dmitry Pryanishnikov : > > > More specifically, it copies no more than 1024 characters (tested > > > both on 4.2-RELEASE and 4.4-RELEASE (fill one of your virtual > > > consoles with text, then select all screen, then switch to another > > > console, start "cat >file" and paste the text, then press ^D twice - > > > you'll see that file size will be no more than 1024). > > > > Yep, it's a termios limitation, not a syscons limitation. I suspect > > that there's a way to get syscons to stop sending data when the input > > queue is full, but it can't be that easy or someone who understands it > > would have fixed it by now. > > Aha, so-called "typeahead buffer"? Is it possible to increase it's size to, > say, 4K (to fit 132x25 screen)? If yes, what #defines one should change? What > negative effects could it give? Looks like you need to change the #define TTYHOG in sys/tty.h, although I haven't actually tried it and I have no idea what the side effects might be. Caveat emptor. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu May 9 6: 6:44 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0B67E37B412 for ; Thu, 9 May 2002 06:06:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from walton.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP id ; 9 May 2002 14:06:38 +0100 (BST) To: Daniel O'Connor Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, iedowse@maths.tcd.ie Subject: Re: APM Pain In-Reply-To: Your message of "09 May 2002 21:21:41 +0930." <1020945104.533.3.camel@chowder.dons.net.au> Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 14:06:38 +0100 From: Ian Dowse Message-ID: <200205091406.aa75790@salmon.maths.tcd.ie> Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <1020945104.533.3.camel@chowder.dons.net.au>, Daniel O'Connor writes : >I recently updated my laptop to -stable (around the beginning of May). >Unfortunately I now can't suspend without crashing during suspend, or on >resume :( >current process = 85 (mount_nfs) I presume you've checked that all modules are in sync with the kernel? The fault details say that it was doing a "mount_nfs"; does the same problem occur if you compile NFS support statically into the kernel? If so, try to get a new stack trace so that the NFS related symbols are included. Ian To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Thu May 9 6:20: 2 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from home.24cl.com (174.113.sn.ct.dsl.thebiz.net [216.238.113.174]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7928437B415 for ; Thu, 9 May 2002 06:19:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ntmm (unknown [63.119.50.193]) by home.24cl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B232B27E for ; Thu, 9 May 2002 09:19:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <200205090919510568.03BA6562@sentry.24cl.com> X-Mailer: Calypso Version 3.30.00.00 (1) Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 09:19:51 -0400 Reply-To: myraq@mgm51.com From: "MikeM" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Steadily increasing memory usage on a lightly loaded server Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I'm running a web server that is lightly loaded, only about 15MB of= bandwidth usage per day. Ever since the recent kernel patches, I have= been noticing that the memory usage is slowly, but surely, notching up.= The server has about 700MB of memory. About a day after a reboot, the= top command shows all except for 40MB being used, but I do not see any= process that is using it. About three days after a reboot, swap starts to= be used, albeit only a little swap. I've been running 4.5 on this server= since it came out, and I never saw these symtpoms until the recent kernel= patches. How can I find out what is using all this memory? Following are three snapshots: (1)dmesg (2)top command right after a= reboot (3)top command after 5 days of running. (1)dmesg**************************************** Copyright (c) 1992-2002 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE-p4 #7: Fri May 3 10:02:00 EDT 2002 mike@[snip]:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/STABLE4FW Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Pentium III/Pentium III Xeon/Celeron (797.48-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin =3D "GenuineIntel" Id =3D 0x686 Stepping =3D 6 Features=3D0x383fbff real memory =3D 805224448 (786352K bytes) avail memory =3D 778473472 (760228K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc0468000. Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled md0: Malloc disk npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 pci0: at 1.0 fxp0: port 0x2200-0x223f mem= 0xfea00000-0xfeafffff,0xfeb7f000-0xfeb7ffff irq 10 at device 2.0 on pci0 fxp0: Ethernet address 00:06:29:1f:27:61 inphy0: on miibus0 inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto isab0: at device 15.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0x700-0x70f at device= 15.1 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ohci0: mem 0xfeb7e000-0xfeb7efff irq 7 at= device 15.2 on pci0 usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb0: on ohci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: (unknown) OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered pcib1: on motherboard pci1: on pcib1 ahc0: port 0x2300-0x23ff mem= 0xeffff000-0xefffffff irq 9 at device 3.0 on pci1 aic7892: Ultra160 Wide Channel A, SCSI Id=3D7, 32/255 SCBs orm0:

Hello,

About 2 weeks ago I upgraded my linux box to a freebsd machine with = a

abit bp6 mobo, 2 celleron = 533mhz cpus, 256m ram, and a 60gig maxtor

hd. I keep getting the error READ command timeout tag=3D0 serv=3D0 -

resetting. below is more details and at the bottom is my dmesg.I am

EXTREAMLY frustrated about to go nuts trying to = pinpoint the problem.

 

To sum it up –

 

PROBLEM: operating system getting read timeouts from = the drive and

resetting it. (the actually error in /var/messages is ad6: READ

command= timeout tag=3D0 serv=3D0 – resetting) When = this happens it haults

the machine and continues until its happy with the reset of the = drive.

It is very random when it happens.. sometimes goes days or hours = or

seconds= .

 

MY TROUBLESHOOTING: Have moved the drive from initial = ata33 controller

to ata66 = udma controller and using a brand new high density = cable. I

have re-compiled the kernel manytimes, I have disconnected = all other

drives<= font size=3D2 face=3DArial> including floppy and recompiled kernel. Disabled ata = from

kernel<= font size=3D2 face=3DArial> and recompiled.. all getting same resulting = random hardrive

device<= font size=3D2 face=3DArial> timing out.

 

WHAT I THINK IT COULD BE: =

 

Bad Hard Drive – The hard drive is brand new = and is not hot to the

touch at all when it panics or crashes but it does make a lot = of

grinding noises when this is occouring I was told from the person = at

the = server.

 

Some Weird unstable ata code with FreeBSD. = -

http://www.google.com/search?hl=3Den&q=3DREAD+comm= and+timeout+tag%3D0+serv%3D0+-+resetting&btnG=3DGoogle+Search

will show you TONS of other people using freeebsd who have = had the

same problem or close to it but no answers except to run in PIO = mode

but even in that I get the same error.

 

Bad Power Supply: When the drive causes a kernel panic… upon reboot

the bios shows no hardrive. You have to switch power leads = from the

supply<= font size=3D2 face=3DArial> to get it to come back, even if it’s the same one you = used

before<= font size=3D2 face=3DArial>. I know bad power supplies can make some fruity shit happen = and

a bitch = to trouble shoot.

 

Just for notes... the hardrive is a brand new Maxtor 60 gig drive. The

case is brand new with a 350w power supply. The motherboard/ram/cpus

came out of a working linux = server.

 

Any Sugestions would be = VERY MUCH appreciated!

 

my dmesg is as follows:

 

Copyright (c) 1992-2002 The FreeBSD = Project.

Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, = 1991, 1992, 1993,

1994

        = The Regents of the = University of = California. All rights

reserved.

FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE #0: Fri May 10 = 19:15:08 CDT = 2002

    = user@h2o.jsnetworth.com:/usr/src/sys/compile/MOO=

Timecounter "i8254"  = frequency 1193182 Hz

CPU: Pentium II/Pentium II Xeon/Celeron (534.55-MHz 686-class CPU)

  Origin = =3D "GenuineIntel"  Id =3D 0x665  Stepping =3D = 5

 

Features=3D0x183fbff<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,PAE,MCE= ,CX8,APIC,SEP,MTRR,PGE,MCA,CMOV,PAT,PSE36,MMX,FXSR><= /font>

real memory  =3D 268435456 (262144K = bytes)

avail memory =3D 258686976 (252624K bytes)

Programming 24 pins in IOAPIC = #0

IOAPIC #0 intpin 2 -> = irq 0

FreeBSD/SMP: Multiprocessor = motherboard

 cpu0 = (BSP): apic id:  = 0, version: 0x00040011, at 0xfee00000

 cpu1 = (AP):  apic id:  1, version: 0x00040011, at = 0xfee00000

 io0 = (APIC): apic id:  = 2, version: 0x00170011, at 0xfec00000

Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc029e000.

Pentium Pro MTRR support = enabled

md0: Malloc = disk

Using $PIR table, 8 entries at = 0xc00fd7e0

npx0: <math processor> on = motherboard

npx0: INT 16 interface

pcib0: <Intel 82443BX (440 BX) host to PCI = bridge> on motherboard

IOAPIC #0 intpin 19 -> = irq 2

IOAPIC #0 intpin 16 -> = irq 10

IOAPIC #0 intpin 18 -> = irq 11

pci0: <PCI bus> on = pcib0

pcib1: <Intel 82443BX (440 BX) PCI-PCI (AGP) = bridge> at device 1.0 on

pci0

pci1: <PCI bus> on = pcib1

isab0: <Intel 82371AB PCI to ISA bridge> at = device 7.0 on pci0

isa0: <ISA bus> on = isab0

atapci0: <Intel PIIX4 ATA33 controller> port 0xf000-0xf00f at device

7.1 on = pci0

ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on = atapci0

ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on = atapci0

pci0: <Intel 82371AB/EB (PIIX4) USB controller> = at 7.2 irq 2

Timecounter "PIIX"  = frequency 3579545 Hz

chip1: <Intel 82371AB Power management = controller> port 0x5000-0x500f

at device = 7.3 on pci0

pci0: <Matrox MGA = Millennium 2064W graphics accelerator> at 15.0 irq

10

rl0: <Accton MPX = 5030/5038 10/100BaseTX> port 0xd400-0xd4ff mem

0xd7000000-0xd70000ff irq = 2 at device 17.0 on pci0

rl0: Ethernet address: = 00:e0:29:5f:b1:14

miibus0: <MII bus> on = rl0

rlphy0: <RealTek = internal media interface> on miibus0

rlphy0:  = 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto

atapci1: <HighPoint = HPT366 ATA66 controller> port

0xe000-0xe0ff,0xdc00-0xdc03,0xd800-0xd807 irq 11 at device 19.0 = on

pci0

ata2: at 0xd800 on = atapci1

atapci2: <HighPoint = HPT366 ATA66 controller> port

0xec00-0xecff,0xe800-0xe803,0xe400-0xe407 irq 11 at device 19.1 = on

pci0

ata3: at 0xe400 on = atapci2

orm0: <Option ROMs> at iomem

0xc0000-0xc7fff,0xc8000-0xc97ff,0xef000-0xeffff on isa0

atkbdc0: <Keyboard controller (i8042)> at port = 0x60,0x64 on isa0

atkbd0: <AT Keyboard> flags 0x1 irq 1 on atkbdc0

kbd0 at = atkbd0

vga0: <Generic ISA VGA> at port 0x3c0-0x3df = iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff = on

isa0

sc0: <System console> at flags 0x100 on = isa0

sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, = flags=3D0x300>

sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on = isa0

sio0: type 16550A

APIC_IO: Testing 8254 interrupt = delivery

APIC_IO: routing 8254 via IOAPIC #0 intpin 2

IP packet filtering initialized, divert enabled, = rule-based forwarding

disabled, default to deny, logging limited to 200 packets/entry = by

default=

SMP: AP CPU #1 Launched!

ad6: 57259MB <MAXTOR 4K060H3> [116336/16/63] at ata3-master UDMA66

Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad6s1a

rl0: promiscuous mode = enabled

 

 

------=_NextPart_000_001D_01C1F888.62149000-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable Sat May 11 3:51:49 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mirage.nlink.com.br (mirage.nlink.com.br [200.249.195.3]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D19BA37B408 for ; Sat, 11 May 2002 03:51:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 16207 invoked by uid 501); 11 May 2002 10:51:40 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 11 May 2002 10:51:40 -0000 Date: Sat, 11 May 2002 07:51:40 -0300 (BRT) From: Paulo Fragoso To: Fred Clift Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Is wi with problems in RELENG_4_5? In-Reply-To: <20020510162213.J49351-100000@vespa.dmz.orem.verio.net> Message-ID: <20020511073455.N3535-100000@mirage.nlink.com.br> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG We have already found same problem caused by conflicts using an ISA pccard adpter, but this problema was a bit different we couldn't start the traffic anyway. Now all works fine by 8 until 30 hours for this problem to happen. We've changed pccard for one new Avaya Wireless without firmeware upgrade and we found same problem. Our dmesg and pccard log is: /kernel: FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE-p4 #0: Mon May 6 10:28:58 BRT 2002 /kernel: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz /kernel: CPU: Pentium II/Pentium II Xeon/Celeron (334.09-MHz 686-class CPU) /kernel: Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x660 Stepping = 0 /kernel: Features=0x183f9ff /kernel: real memory = 67108864 (65536K bytes) /kernel: avail memory = 60424192 (59008K bytes) /kernel: Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc046e000. /kernel: Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled /kernel: md0: Malloc disk /kernel: Using $PIR table, 7 entries at 0xc00f8740 /kernel: npx0: on motherboard /kernel: npx0: INT 16 interface /kernel: pcib0: on motherboard /kernel: pci0: on pcib0 /kernel: pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 /kernel: pci1: on pcib1 /kernel: pci1: at 0.0 irq 11 /kernel: isab0: at device 7.0 on pci0 /kernel: isa0: on isab0 /kernel: atapci0: port 0xffa0-0xffaf at device 7.1 on pci0 /kernel: ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 /kernel: uhci0: port 0xef80-0xef9f irq 10 at device 7.2 on pci0 /kernel: usb0: on uhci0 /kernel: usb0: USB revision 1.0 /kernel: uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 /kernel: uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered /kernel: chip1: port 0x5f00-0x5f0f at device 7.3 on pci0 /kernel: rl0: port 0xec00-0xecff mem 0xffafff00-0xffafffff irq 11 at device 15.0 on pci0 /kernel: rl0: Ethernet address: 00:e0:4c:e2:14:76 /kernel: miibus0: on rl0 /kernel: rlphy0: on miibus0 /kernel: rlphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto /kernel: pci_cfgintr_search: linked (61) to configured irq 11 at 0:15:0 /kernel: pci_cfgintr: 0:16 INTA routed to irq 11 /kernel: pcic0: irq 11 at device 16.0 on pci0 /kernel: pcic0: PCI Memory allocated: 0x44000000 /kernel: pcic0: TI12XX PCI Config Reg: [pwr save][CSC parallel isa irq] /kernel: pccard0: on pcic0 /kernel: orm0: