From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 30 08:27:03 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93DBB16A4CE; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 08:27:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from tinker.exit.com (tinker.exit.com [206.223.0.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DEAE43FCB; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 08:26:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) Received: from realtime.exit.com (realtime [206.223.0.5]) by tinker.exit.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAUGQoCq051456; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 08:26:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from frank@exit.com) Received: from realtime.exit.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by realtime.exit.com (8.12.10/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAUGQoMC021494; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 08:26:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from frank@realtime.exit.com) Received: (from frank@localhost) by realtime.exit.com (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id hAUGQoOQ021493; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 08:26:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from frank) From: Frank Mayhar Message-Id: <200311301626.hAUGQoOQ021493@realtime.exit.com> In-Reply-To: <20031130070704.GA64793@funkthat.com> To: John-Mark Gurney Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 08:26:50 -0800 (PST) X-Copyright0: Copyright 2003 Frank Mayhar. All Rights Reserved. X-Copyright1: Permission granted for electronic reproduction as Usenet News or email only. X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99f (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII cc: stable@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MAJOR number X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: frank@exit.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 16:27:03 -0000 Piggybacking on that request... I also need a major number. I had requested one some time ago, but it apparently got lost in the shuffle. The device is a Specialix I/O8+ multiport serial card. I've been using it for some weeks now without problems. For now the driver is -stable only; I'll port it to 5.x when I can test it there. When I have a major number, I'll submit the driver for official inclusion in -stable. -- Frank Mayhar frank@exit.com http://www.exit.com/ Exit Consulting http://www.gpsclock.com/ http://www.exit.com/blog/frank/ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 30 10:20:29 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A0CA16A4CE for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 10:20:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from access.inet.co.th (access.inet.co.th [203.151.127.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7936243FBF for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 10:20:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pirat@access.inet.co.th) Received: from firak.thai-aec.org (TruPPPv92-230-115.inet.co.th [203.151.230.115]) by access.inet.co.th (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id hAUIKNCS099018; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 01:20:24 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from pirat@access.inet.co.th) Received: from firak.thai-aec.org (localhost.thai-aec.org [127.0.0.1]) by firak.thai-aec.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id hAUIKMIq000465; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 01:20:22 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from pirat@access.inet.co.th) Received: (from pirat@localhost) by firak.thai-aec.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id hAUIKJCG000464; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 01:20:19 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from pirat@access.inet.co.th) X-Authentication-Warning: firak.thai-aec.org: pirat set sender to pirat@access.inet.co.th using -f Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 01:20:19 +0700 From: pirat To: Joe Marcus Clarke Message-ID: <20031130182019.GA419@thai-aec.org> References: <20031119105914.GA20096@thai-aec.org> <20031120013737.GF22360@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20031126043458.GA1947@thai-aec.org> <1069822454.7292.147.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=tis-620 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1069822454.7292.147.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD firak.thai-aec.org 4.9-STABLE FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE www-home-page: http://www.thai-aec.org www-FreeBSD-page: http://www.thai.net/makham cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Dell Inspiron 1100 and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 18:20:29 -0000 On Tuesday, 25 November 2003 at 23:54:15 -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > Subject: Re: Dell Inspiron 1100 and FreeBSD > From: Joe Marcus Clarke > To: pirat > Cc: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" , FreeBSD-stable@freebsd.org > X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 > Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2003 23:54:15 -0500 > > On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 23:34, pirat wrote: > > On Thursday, 20 November 2003 at 12:07:37 +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2003 12:07:37 +1030 > > > From: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" > > > To: pirat > > > Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org > > > Subject: Re: Dell Inspiron 1100 and FreeBSD > > > > > > > > > On Wednesday, 19 November 2003 at 17:59:14 +0700, pirat wrote: > > > > hi sirs, > > > > > > > > i have one notebook from dell, inspiron 1100. i would like to know > > > > if this notebook can be used with freebsd or not. it has on board > > > > broadcom nic. but the current os - linux TLE - does not `see' it > > > > also. > > > > > > This is pretty much the same as the Inspiron 5100 I have. The onboard > > > NIC is supported in stable, but I had some problems starting X: the > > > BIOS wasn't completely mapped, and I had to compile it in to the > > > server. See http://www.lemis.com/grog/diary-jul2003.html#25 for more > > > details. > > > > > hi sirs, > > > > after looking for many archives and asking Duncan i found that bcm4400 > > in Inspiron 1100 is bfe not bge. yesterday, i had a chance to install 5.1 on > > my inspiron but 5.1 still did not 'see' that nic :( also touch pad. > > You need -CURRENT for bfe(4) support. For the touch pad, checkout my > Inspiron 5150 tips at > http://gerda.univie.ac.at/freebsd-laptops/index.pl?action=show_laptop_detail&laptop=147. The solution is the same for both models. > > Joe > hi sirs, my bios version is A23 so that i am not sure if i need to do patching for DSDT or not. but if i have to do, i do not find intel disassembler from freebsd port tree. i am using 4.9-stable with best regards, psr http://www.thai-aec.org http://www.thai.net/makham From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 30 14:39:37 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87ED616A4CE for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 14:39:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4324843FD7 for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 14:39:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hAUMatMg072008; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 17:36:55 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (robert@localhost)hAUMatQY072005; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 17:36:55 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 17:36:54 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Watson X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Brett Glass In-Reply-To: <200311200036.RAA18628@lariat.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does 4.9-RELEASE work with 3Ware RAID card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 22:39:37 -0000 On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Brett Glass wrote: > I've got a machine here that needs an OS reinstall. It's using a 3Ware > (twe) RAID card. Does the driver for this card work properly under > 4.9-RELEASE? Not sure if you ever got an answer to the affirmative, but I'm running several personal servers on 4.9-RC and 4.9-RELEASE quite smoothly with the twe driver. ftp-master.FreeBSD.org is also running 4.9-PRERELEASE with twe cards quite happily. twe is pretty well supported, generally, and widely used with FreeBSD by some pretty big consumers of FreeBSD. I'm using the 64xx line and haven't had a reason to try any of the newer cards as yet. Some illustrative dmesg output below. One suggestion, however: make sure you're running with the latest firmware available, especially for the 64xx line. I've had problems with clean recovery from drive failure using mirroring on some of the older firmware revisions, which is apparently a "known problem" with those versions of the firmware. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Senior Research Scientist, McAfee Research box1: (4.9-RC) twe0: <3ware Storage Controller> port 0xefa0-0xefaf irq 11 at device 19.0 on pci0 twe0: 4 ports, Firmware FE6X 1.02.28.053, BIOS BE6X 1.07.02.005 twed0: on twe0 twed0: 76343MB (156351488 sectors) box2: (4.9-PRERELEASE) twe0: <3ware Storage Controller> port 0xef80-0xef8f mem 0xfe000000-0xfe7fffff,0xfebff800-0xfebff80f irq 15 at device 3.0 on pci1 twe0: 8 ports, Firmware FE7X 1.05.00.056, BIOS BE7X 1.08.00.046 twed0: on twe0 twed0: 468997MB (960506880 sectors) box3: (4.9-RC) twe0: <3ware Storage Controller> port 0xefa0-0xefaf irq 9 at device 18.0 on pci0 twe0: 4 ports, Firmware FE6X 1.02.28.053, BIOS BE6X 1.07.02.005 twed0: on twe0 twed0: 117245MB (240119680 sectors) From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 30 18:10:52 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5321616A4CE; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 18:10:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from sizone.org (mortar.sizone.org [65.126.154.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D320343FDD; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 18:10:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dgilbert@daveg.ca) Received: by sizone.org (Postfix, from userid 66) id 0B5BF3077A; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 02:10:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: by canoe.dclg.ca (Postfix, from userid 101) id 73B501D245C; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 21:10:54 -0500 (EST) From: David Gilbert MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16330.41774.186801.586670@canoe.dclg.ca> Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 21:10:54 -0500 To: pirat In-Reply-To: <20031129215515.GA332@thai-aec.org> References: <20031119105914.GA20096@thai-aec.org> <20031120013737.GF22360@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20031126043458.GA1947@thai-aec.org> <1069822454.7292.147.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20031129215515.GA332@thai-aec.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 14) "Reasonable Discussion" XEmacs Lucid cc: Greg 'groggy' Lehey cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Dell Inspiron 1100 and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 02:10:52 -0000 >>>>> "pirat" == pirat writes: >> onboard > > NIC is supported in stable, but I had some problems >> starting X: the > > BIOS wasn't completely mapped, and I had to >> compile it in to the > > server. See >> http://www.lemis.com/grog/diary-jul2003.html#25 for more > > >> details. That won't help much with the 1100's X. It's got an intel chipset for it's video ... and frustratingly, the BIOS only allocates 842k of video memory. I have a chunk of linux code that fixes this, but I havn't gotten this going in FreeBSD yet. Basically X will run in 1024x768x8bit mode ... which is sub-optimal. It was a pain before to run in 8 bit, but now it's horrid (as few, if any, applications are in the least bit 8bit aware). ... Now if you have the old (Phoenix ?) BIOS "A06" ... aparently you're good to go. There's a BIOS option for more RAM... but the new "Dell" BIOS (A20 and newer) have no option for this. Sux. I'd even settle for A06 ... but I can't find a copy of it. Dave. -- ============================================================================ |David Gilbert, Independent Contractor. | Two things can only be | |Mail: dave@daveg.ca | equal if and only if they | |http://daveg.ca | are precisely opposite. | =========================================================GLO================ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 30 18:12:36 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D906816A4CE for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 18:12:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from sizone.org (mortar.sizone.org [65.126.154.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EDDC43FB1 for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 18:12:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from dgilbert@daveg.ca) Received: by sizone.org (Postfix, from userid 66) id E39223077F; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 02:12:33 +0000 (GMT) Received: by canoe.dclg.ca (Postfix, from userid 101) id 1576B1D1ED7; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 21:12:41 -0500 (EST) From: David Gilbert MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <16330.41880.893975.332275@canoe.dclg.ca> Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 21:12:40 -0500 To: pirat In-Reply-To: <20031130182019.GA419@thai-aec.org> References: <20031119105914.GA20096@thai-aec.org> <20031120013737.GF22360@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20031126043458.GA1947@thai-aec.org> <1069822454.7292.147.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20031130182019.GA419@thai-aec.org> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 14) "Reasonable Discussion" XEmacs Lucid cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Dell Inspiron 1100 and FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 02:12:37 -0000 >>>>> "pirat" == pirat writes: pirat> my bios version is A23 so that i am not sure if i need to do pirat> patching for DSDT or not. but if i have to do, i do not find pirat> intel disassembler from freebsd port tree. i am using pirat> 4.9-stable As with all Dell BIOS's that I've encountered recently, all Dell ACPI code right up to A23 for the 1100 is riddled with bugs. If you email me directly, I can get you a corrected one. For instance, without a corrected DSDT, believe-it-or-not, your builtin mouse won't work !?! Dave. -- ============================================================================ |David Gilbert, Independent Contractor. | Two things can only be | |Mail: dave@daveg.ca | equal if and only if they | |http://daveg.ca | are precisely opposite. | =========================================================GLO================ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 30 18:19:56 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3D2616A4CE; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 18:19:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from lariat.org (lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C1F043FD7; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 18:19:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from brett@lariat.org) Received: from runaround.lariat.org (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.org@lariat.org [63.229.157.2]) by lariat.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id TAA26076; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 19:19:35 -0700 (MST) X-message-flag: Warning! Use of Microsoft Outlook renders your system susceptible to Internet worms. Message-Id: <6.0.0.22.2.20031130191600.03653c80@localhost> X-Sender: brett@localhost (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.0.22 Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 19:19:29 -0700 To: Robert Watson From: Brett Glass In-Reply-To: References: <200311200036.RAA18628@lariat.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does 4.9-RELEASE work with 3Ware RAID card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 02:19:57 -0000 At 03:36 PM 11/30/2003, Robert Watson wrote: >Not sure if you ever got an answer to the affirmative, but I'm running >several personal servers on 4.9-RC and 4.9-RELEASE quite smoothly with the >twe driver. I got some encouraging reports, and so tried it. The machine, which has an Escalade 6800, does seem to be running OK. I had to upgrade it to the latest firmware, as you mentioned -- not only to make it stable but to get it to recognize large hard drives and enable the use of a "hot spare." For some reason, 3Ware requires you to upgrade twice -- once to an intermediate version and then to the latest -- if you still have the original firmware on the board, which this one did. --Brett Glass From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 30 18:22:57 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 950B816A4CF for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 18:22:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D31C43F85 for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 18:22:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hB12KGMg076131; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 21:20:16 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (robert@localhost)hB12KGTv076128; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 21:20:16 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2003 21:20:16 -0500 (EST) From: Robert Watson X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Brett Glass In-Reply-To: <6.0.0.22.2.20031130191600.03653c80@localhost> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does 4.9-RELEASE work with 3Ware RAID card? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 02:22:57 -0000 On Sun, 30 Nov 2003, Brett Glass wrote: > At 03:36 PM 11/30/2003, Robert Watson wrote: > > >Not sure if you ever got an answer to the affirmative, but I'm running > >several personal servers on 4.9-RC and 4.9-RELEASE quite smoothly with the > >twe driver. > > I got some encouraging reports, and so tried it. The machine, which has > an Escalade 6800, does seem to be running OK. I had to upgrade it to the > latest firmware, as you mentioned -- not only to make it stable but to > get it to recognize large hard drives and enable the use of a "hot > spare." For some reason, 3Ware requires you to upgrade twice -- once to > an intermediate version and then to the latest -- if you still have the > original firmware on the board, which this one did. Yeah, I completely forgot about that -- only one of my systems has "large hard disks" requiring the second firmware upgrade, but indeed, that is another reason to make sure the firmware is really up-to-date. Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Senior Research Scientist, McAfee Research From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 30 21:18:17 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E898916A4CE for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 21:18:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from TheWorld.com (pcls3.std.com [192.74.137.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBEDF43FDF for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 21:18:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kwc@shell.TheWorld.com) Received: from shell.TheWorld.com (pip1-5.std.com [192.74.137.185]) by TheWorld.com (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id hB15I8Di015443; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 00:18:08 -0500 Received: (from kwc@localhost) by shell.TheWorld.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id AAA8752973; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 00:18:02 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 00:18:02 -0500 (EST) From: Kenneth W Cochran Message-Id: <200312010518.AAA8752973@shell.TheWorld.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: ecn info X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 05:18:18 -0000 Where might I find information on how FreeBSD handles ECN (explicit congestion notification)? I've been searching the mailing list archives & so far can't find anything. Thanks, -kc From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 30 22:00:00 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8EBC16A4CE for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 22:00:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp2.eunet.yu (smtp2.eunet.yu [194.247.192.242]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2F6543FCB for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 21:59:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kolicz@eunet.yu) Received: from smtp2.EUnet.yu (root@localhost) by smtp2.eunet.yu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id hB15xvpF001689 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 06:59:57 +0100 Received: from zoran.kolic.net (P-2.48.EUnet.yu [213.240.2.48]) by smtp2.eunet.yu (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id hB15xteu001626 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 06:59:56 +0100 Received: by zoran.kolic.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 1 Dec 2003 06:59:40 +0100 From: "Zoran Kolic" Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 06:59:40 +0100 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031201055940.GA520@> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Subject: mail without mta X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 06:00:00 -0000 Dear list! I'd like to know if some- one has experience with system running no mta (aka sendmail). I have single comp, not server, not lan. Yes! Sendmail is nice, but it is too big for simple tasks I have for it. My intention is to use apps small as possible. This letter gone from mutt directly to ssmtp, that processed it to my isp. (Setting option for sendmail as "/usr/local/sbin/ssmtp".) Little drawback is that one cannot write second letter and send it at the same time. Some sort of queue would be helpful. Problems start receiving mail. Fetchmail manual announces po- ssibility for handing over to procmail. Option should be "mda procmail" in user section. I made no rc file for procmail. Test letter really came from pop server to my local depot (/var/mail/zoran). And... Mutt cannot read it. Says "/var/mail/ /zoran is not maildir". It is by default, my dear mutt! I see, that I have to make some procmailrc configuration file. To tell the system, that procmail is local delivery agent now, who is on the machine and where target files are. I need additional reading to anticipate that. No local mail = no system messages. And no simple system I'd like. Documentation on internet says, that shell in procmailrc should be /bin/sh. I use tcsh and the only solution would be to add /usr/local/bin/bash. Defaults are already on the machine. Why procmail doesn't use them? Aliases? File permissions? It is the step I cannot make for now. Turning sendmail on again gave me mail back. I suppose that someone uses similar configuration on laptop or other not heavy loaded machine. Best regards ZK From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 30 22:20:40 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9CE116A4CE for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 22:20:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from apollo.laserfence.net (apollo.laserfence.net [196.44.69.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 568A043FA3 for ; Sun, 30 Nov 2003 22:20:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from will@unfoldings.net) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost) by apollo.laserfence.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD) id 1AQhQ5-000Cz3-C9; Mon, 01 Dec 2003 08:20:29 +0200 Received: from apollo.laserfence.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (apollo.laserfence.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 48905-05; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 08:20:11 +0200 (SAST) Received: from [192.168.255.1] (helo=prometheus.home.laserfence.net) by apollo.laserfence.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD) id 1AQhPl-000Cyn-Kv; Mon, 01 Dec 2003 08:20:10 +0200 Received: from arista.home.laserfence.net ([192.168.0.10] helo=arista) by prometheus.home.laserfence.net with smtp (Exim 4.10) id 1AQhPg-000F0l-00; Mon, 01 Dec 2003 08:20:04 +0200 Message-ID: <013601c3b7d3$45d252e0$0a00a8c0@arista> From: "Willie Viljoen" To: "Zoran Kolic" , References: <20031201055940.GA520@> Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 08:20:53 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at laserfence.net Subject: Re: mail without mta X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 06:20:40 -0000 Have you considered using Exim as your MTA? It is much simpler to configure and use than sendmail, and alot less hungry for resources, but it will give you the same (and even better) functionality to sendmail. Exim is in /usr/ports/mail/exim/ Will ----- Original Message ----- From: "Zoran Kolic" To: Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 7:59 AM Subject: mail without mta > > Dear list! > I'd like to know if some- > one has experience with system > running no mta (aka sendmail). > I have single comp, not server, > not lan. Yes! Sendmail is nice, > but it is too big for simple > tasks I have for it. > My intention is to use apps > small as possible. This letter > gone from mutt directly to > ssmtp, that processed it to my > isp. (Setting option for > sendmail as "/usr/local/sbin/ssmtp".) > Little drawback is that one > cannot write second letter > and send it at the same time. > Some sort of queue would be > helpful. > Problems start receiving mail. > Fetchmail manual announces po- > ssibility for handing over to > procmail. Option should be > "mda procmail" in user section. > I made no rc file for procmail. > Test letter really came from > pop server to my local depot > (/var/mail/zoran). And... Mutt > cannot read it. Says "/var/mail/ > /zoran is not maildir". It is > by default, my dear mutt! > I see, that I have to make some > procmailrc configuration file. > To tell the system, that procmail > is local delivery agent now, > who is on the machine and where > target files are. I need additional > reading to anticipate that. > No local mail = no system messages. > And no simple system I'd like. > Documentation on internet > says, that shell in procmailrc > should be /bin/sh. I use tcsh and > the only solution would be to add > /usr/local/bin/bash. Defaults > are already on the machine. Why > procmail doesn't use them? > Aliases? File permissions? > It is the step I cannot make > for now. Turning sendmail on > again gave me mail back. > I suppose that someone uses > similar configuration on laptop > or other not heavy loaded machine. > Best regards > > ZK > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 1 00:26:44 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2674116A4CE for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 00:26:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from likya.bimel.com.tr (likya.bimel.com.tr [212.175.96.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F352343FB1 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 00:26:38 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ustuntas@bimel.com.tr) Received: (from root@localhost) by likya.bimel.com.tr (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) id hB18QCHI096935 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 10:26:12 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ustuntas@bimel.com.tr) Received: from bimel.com.tr (zeugma.bimel.com.tr [212.175.96.11]) by likya.bimel.com.tr (8.12.9p2/8.12.9av) with ESMTP id hB18QBBg096923 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 10:26:11 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from ustuntas@bimel.com.tr) Message-ID: <3FCAFB18.2040203@bimel.com.tr> Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 10:26:00 +0200 From: Murat Ustuntas User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en, tr MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-9; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS perl-11 Subject: bind compile error message X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 08:26:44 -0000 Hello all, After receiving the FreeBSD-SA-03:19.bind message, i try to patch and compile the bind. My patch is for 4.9 and --STABLE one. In the /usr/src/usr.sbin/named , i have put the command make obj && make depend && make and take the error: (u=${USER-root} d=`pwd` h=`hostname` t=`LC_ALL=C date`; sed -e "s|%WHEN%|${t}|" -e "s|%VERSION%|"8.3.7-REL"|" -e "s|%WHOANDWHERE%|${u}@${h}:${d}|" < /usr/src/usr.sbin/named/../../contrib/bind/bin/named/version.c > tmp_version.c) sed: 1: "s|%WHOANDWHERE%|who | h ...": bad flag in substitute command: 'h' *** Error code 1 My system is 4.9-RC FreeBSD. How can I correct the problem.? Regards, Murat Ustuntas From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 1 03:35:18 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 136C816A4CE for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 03:35:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk (dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk [194.200.93.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0EF143F3F for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 03:35:16 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from petefrench@keithprowse.com) Received: from petefrench by dilbert.firstcallgroup.co.uk with local (Exim 4.22) id 1AQmKd-0005Fe-LC; Mon, 01 Dec 2003 11:35:11 +0000 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, kolicz@eunet.yu In-Reply-To: <20031201055940.GA520@> Message-Id: From: Pete French Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 11:35:11 +0000 Subject: Re: mail without mta X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 11:35:18 -0000 > I'd like to know if some- > one has experience with system > running no mta (aka sendmail). Running without an MTA sounds like the wrong solution to the problem. Have you thought of replacing sendmail with something like exim ? I use that as an MTA on single machines all the time. very easy to configure and not very resource hungry. Willjust sit there quietly and do the job without any fuss. ...there are a number of other options too which people will no doubt mention. -pcf. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 1 06:35:26 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5768816A4CF for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 06:35:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from mailout.informatik.tu-muenchen.de (mailout.informatik.tu-muenchen.de [131.159.0.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE08E43FF7 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 06:35:11 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from barner@in.tum.de) Received: from zi025.glhnet.mhn.de (localhost.glhnet.mhn.de. [127.0.0.1]) by zi025.glhnet.mhn.de (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id hB1EZ4vn019163; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 15:35:04 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from simon@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de) Received: (from simon@localhost) by zi025.glhnet.mhn.de (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id hB1EZ3Kd019162; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 15:35:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from simon) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 15:35:02 +0100 From: Simon Barner To: Zoran Kolic Message-ID: <20031201143502.GA3686@zi025.glhnet.mhn.de> References: <20031201055940.GA520@> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031201055940.GA520@> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at informatik.tu-muenchen.de cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mail without mta X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 14:35:26 -0000 --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi, although this does not answer your question directly, it might be useful for you (in case you decide to use sendmail as your mta :-) I wrote a sendmail howto for FreeBSD workstation installations. It still needs some minor improvements, but it should be quite usable in its present state: http://home.leo.org/~barner/freebsd/articles/mailsetup/article.html Regards, Simon --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/y1GWCkn+/eutqCoRApZAAKCgd80YVFlkI+BNetsZMI6yZsXZZwCg5cne FZjsayZmPWBUthOCPl8bYXc= =9Pbc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 1 14:39:44 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B87216A4CF for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 14:39:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from scaup.mail.pas.earthlink.net (scaup.mail.pas.earthlink.net [207.217.120.49]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F234043FF5 for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 14:39:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from andrei@kableu.com) Received: from h-68-164-91-242.snvacaid.dynamic.covad.net ([68.164.91.242] helo=home.kableu.com) by scaup.mail.pas.earthlink.net with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1AQwhc-00065p-00; Mon, 01 Dec 2003 14:39:36 -0800 Received: by home.kableu.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7343A870; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 14:39:24 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 14:39:24 -0800 From: Andrew Konstantinov To: Zoran Kolic Message-ID: <20031201223924.GA27964@home.kableu.com> References: <20031201055940.GA520@> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031201055940.GA520@> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mail without mta X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 22:39:44 -0000 --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, You might want to use 'maildrop' instead of using a full-featured MTA daemon. Personally, I've never tried maildrop, althought I often hear from different people that it is a good substitue for those who do not want to run a full-featured MTA daemon, but need something to listen on 25th port in order to accept mail from the 'fetchmail' and deposit it into the local mailbox. I personally prefer postfix. It's a full-featured MTA daemon/system but it is very easy to configure (just like exim), and it supports Maildir type of mailbox! Hope this helps, Andrew On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 06:59:40AM +0100, Zoran Kolic wrote: >=20 > Dear list! > I'd like to know if some- > one has experience with system > running no mta (aka sendmail). > I have single comp, not server, > not lan. Yes! Sendmail is nice, > but it is too big for simple > tasks I have for it. > My intention is to use apps > small as possible. This letter > gone from mutt directly to > ssmtp, that processed it to my > isp. (Setting option for > sendmail as "/usr/local/sbin/ssmtp".) > Little drawback is that one > cannot write second letter > and send it at the same time. > Some sort of queue would be > helpful. > Problems start receiving mail. > Fetchmail manual announces po- > ssibility for handing over to > procmail. Option should be > "mda procmail" in user section. > I made no rc file for procmail. > Test letter really came from > pop server to my local depot > (/var/mail/zoran). And... Mutt > cannot read it. Says "/var/mail/ > /zoran is not maildir". It is > by default, my dear mutt! > I see, that I have to make some > procmailrc configuration file. > To tell the system, that procmail > is local delivery agent now, > who is on the machine and where > target files are. I need additional > reading to anticipate that. > No local mail =3D no system messages. > And no simple system I'd like. > Documentation on internet > says, that shell in procmailrc > should be /bin/sh. I use tcsh and > the only solution would be to add > /usr/local/bin/bash. Defaults > are already on the machine. Why > procmail doesn't use them? > Aliases? File permissions? > It is the step I cannot make > for now. Turning sendmail on > again gave me mail back. > I suppose that someone uses > similar configuration on laptop > or other not heavy loaded machine. > Best regards >=20 > ZK >=20 >=20 --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/y8McttaE8kbpwrARAjy2AJ9S/oUQV/isgyLgeJiocg5L8HDWBQCdHBM4 /pLZp+xMbBCBbpvTPOgm0Q8= =CKZX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 1 14:43:43 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FE7016A4CE for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 14:43:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from mx2.mail.ru (mx2.mail.ru [194.67.23.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B26943F3F for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 14:43:42 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from megapopoff@mail.ru) Received: from [80.252.128.110] (port=62124 helo=192.168.254.170) by mx2.mail.ru with esmtp id 1AQwlZ-000Dg6-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 02 Dec 2003 01:43:41 +0300 Date: Tue, 2 Dec 2003 01:45:02 +0300 From: Alexey Popov X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.61) Organization: Home X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <2344187558.20031202014502@mail.ru> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam: Not detected Subject: 4.9-RELEASE kernel panic (page fault) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_timeout.c:252 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Alexey Popov List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Dec 2003 22:43:43 -0000 Hello. Can anybody please give some advise to prevent this strange kernel panics on FreeBSD 4.9? (see http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/59185) In addition to PR text I found than crashes become less often with sysctl kern.timecounter.method set to 1. As I said, similiar panics were with 4.8-RELEASE but I thought this depends on broken xl(4) and had no coredumps. Kernel crashes always at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_timeout.c:252 Thank you. -- Best regards, Alexey mailto:megapopoff@mail.ru From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 1 16:03:37 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 929DB16A4CE for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 16:03:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from ran.psg.com (ip166.usw253.dsl-acs2.sea.iinet.com [209.20.253.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27FE743FCB for ; Mon, 1 Dec 2003 16:03:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from randy@psg.com) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=ran.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.22) id 1AQy0t-000MpV-Eq for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 01 Dec 2003 16:03:35 -0800 From: Randy Bush MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2003 16:03:35 -0800 To: FreeBSD Stable Message-Id: Subject: boot hang - uhub2: device problem, disabling port 1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 00:03:37 -0000 thinkpad t40p -stable as of an hour ago did not happen in -stable of about a week ago Copyright (c) 1992-2003 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.9-STABLE #5: Mon Dec 1 15:12:49 PST 2003 root@roam.psg.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ROAM Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1600MHz (1594.83-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x695 Stepping = 5 Features=0xa7e9f9bf real memory = 1073086464 (1047936K bytes) avail memory = 1040891904 (1016496K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "kernel" at 0xc038d000. Preloaded elf module "snd_ich.ko" at 0xc038d09c. Preloaded elf module "snd_pcm.ko" at 0xc038d13c. Pentium Pro MTRR support enabled Using $PIR table, 15 entries at 0xc00fdea0 apm0: on motherboard apm0: found APM BIOS v1.2, connected at v1.2 npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: on motherboard pci0: on pcib0 agp0: mem 0xd0000000-0xdfffffff at device 0.0 on pci0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pci1: at 0.0 irq 11 uhci0: port 0x1800-0x181f irq 11 at device 29.0 on pci0 usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: port 0x1820-0x183f irq 11 at device 29.1 on pci0 usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci2: port 0x1840-0x185f irq 11 at device 29.2 on pci0 usb2: on uhci2 usb2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ****** big pause ****** uhub2: device problem, disabling port 1 ^^^^^^^^^^^^ the problem ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ pci0: at 29.7 irq 11 pcib2: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 pcic0: mem 0xb0000000-0xb0000fff irq 11 at device 0.0 on pci2 pcic0: TI12XX PCI Config Reg: [speaker enable][pwr save][CSC serial isa irq] pccard0: on pcic0 pcic1: mem 0xb1000000-0xb1000fff irq 11 at device 0.1 on pci2 pcic1: TI12XX PCI Config Reg: [speaker enable][pwr save][CSC serial isa irq] pccard1: on pcic1 em0: port 0x8000-0x803f mem 0xc0200000-0xc020ffff,0xc0220000-0xc023ffff irq 11 at device 1.0 on pci2 em0: Speed:N/A Duplex:N/A pci2: (vendor=0x168c, dev=0x0012) at 2.0 irq 11 isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0x1860-0x186f,0-0x3,0-0x7,0-0x3,0-0x7 at device 31.1 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 pci0: (vendor=0x8086, dev=0x24c3) at 31.3 irq 11 pcm0: port 0x18c0-0x18ff,0x1c00-0x1cff mem 0xc0000800-0xc00008ff,0xc0000c00-0xc0000dff irq 11 at device 31.5 on pci0 pcm0: pci0: (vendor=0x8086, dev=0x24c6) at 31.6 irq 11 eisa0: on motherboard eisa0: unknown card @@@0000 (0x00000000) at slot 1 orm0: