From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 29 01:38:41 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 759FA16A4CE for ; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 01:38:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from pandora.cs.kun.nl (pandora.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CE1043D1F for ; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 01:38:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from adridg@cs.kun.nl) Received: from odin.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.33] (helo=localhost) by pandora.cs.kun.nl (8.12.10/3.64) with ESMTP id i1T9ccUY017915; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 10:38:38 +0100 (MET) From: Adriaan de Groot To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 10:38:37 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.51 References: <4040A9FA.50801@hiof.no> In-Reply-To: <4040A9FA.50801@hiof.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200402291038.38198.adridg@cs.kun.nl> cc: Henrik W Lund Subject: Re: Considering an AMD64 system... X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 09:38:41 -0000 =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hej Hendrik, On Saturday 28 February 2004 15:47, Henrik W Lund wrote: > I'm considering investing in an AMD64-system, mainly for home/desktop > use (gaming, programming for fun and just generally goofing around, > trying stuff out), and as such do not need any high-end dual Opteron This matches my usage pattern fairly well (though I had a specific goal in= =20 mind: making sure the KDE ports work on amd64). I ended up with an asus k8v= =20 deluxe (mind you the wifi slot seems totally useless) and an amd64 3200+ (t= he=20 only thing available back in november). > Now, since I want to run my favourite OS on the system, I want to know > if the amd64 architecture is well supported. I know it says on the > website that amd64 is a Tier 1 architecture, but from reading this > list and checking out docs, it seems as if it's just a teensy bit > unstable. Or is this due to fragility of the hardware (with memory > lockups, freezing and such)? It should be stated that I am not exactly =46or regular desktop usage it can be rather spotty. I've not tried to run = any=20 32-bit FBSD apps on it yet. This is said to work fairly well, and might=20 provide a workaround for those apps that don't work in native amd64 mode. T= he=20 ones I've run across in daily use recently are: * xpdf (though kpdf works fine) * xfig (weird crash in libxpm, which I've got a workaround for) As far as getting my regular work done (writing a thesis), using KDE as=20 desktop, it's fine. > Now, if the amd64 is indeed fully supported, this leads me to another > question: what hardware is supported? I'm mainly thinking of > mainboards and their chipsets here, as I reckon most of the regular > hardware (graphics cards, sound cards, etc) are compatible with both There were issues with X not supporting anything but Matrox cards, but that= =20 era has passed :) > the amd64 and the i386 platform (if I got the wrong idea here, please > tell me!). What chipsets would you recommend? I kinda have my eye on > the nForce chipset, as I understand this is good for multimedia (and > gaming), but I'm open to suggestions. nForce has issues - at least, that's what I'm led to believe by posts on th= is=20 list. Quoting a message from David from feb. 16th: nVidia nForce3 [for AMD64] chipsets are very problematic for Unix(BSD)/Linux. I would avoid them if you want to run a non-MS-Windows operating system. So there's your platform recommendation. As for the kind of panics I've had, the only one in the past month was whil= e=20 mounting a USB pendrive. Generally, the system seems to become a little=20 unstable after running for a while and then suddenly changing usage pattern= s=20 (like it used to panic when ripping a CD after it'd been up for several day= s=20 doing other things).=20 =2D --=20 pub 1024D/FEA2A3FE 2002-06-18 Adriaan de Groot Would you like a freem? =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAQbMedqzuAf6io/4RAprwAJ9/k+vX2V73s/oPJ5SvEOub4iOcjQCfanOW SvcQ4W2L8jLdfnTvD+K6Rvs=3D =3DQEAQ =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 29 03:06:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4F1A16A4CE; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 03:06:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebsd-current.sentex.ca (freebsd-current.sentex.ca [64.7.128.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B4443D2D; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 03:06:44 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: by freebsd-current.sentex.ca (Postfix, from userid 666) id 0A0767303A; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 06:06:43 -0500 (EST) Sender: FreeBSD Tinderbox From: FreeBSD Tinderbox To: FreeBSD Tinderbox , , Precedence: bulk Message-Id: <20040229110643.0A0767303A@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 06:06:43 -0500 (EST) Subject: [current tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:06:44 -0000 TB --- 2004-02-29 10:09:41 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2004-02-29 10:09:41 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2004-02-29 10:09:41 - checking out the source tree TB --- 2004-02-29 10:09:41 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64 TB --- 2004-02-29 10:09:41 - /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2004-02-29 10:13:32 - building world TB --- 2004-02-29 10:13:32 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src TB --- 2004-02-29 10:13:32 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree >>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims >>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2.3: build tools >>> stage 3: cross tools >>> stage 4.1: building includes >>> stage 4.2: building libraries >>> stage 4.3: make dependencies >>> stage 4.4: building everything.. TB --- 2004-02-29 11:00:31 - building generic kernel TB --- 2004-02-29 11:00:31 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src TB --- 2004-02-29 11:00:31 - /usr/bin/make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC >>> Kernel build for GENERIC started on Sun Feb 29 11:00:31 GMT 2004 >>> Kernel build for GENERIC completed on Sun Feb 29 11:06:42 GMT 2004 TB --- 2004-02-29 11:06:42 - generating LINT kernel config TB --- 2004-02-29 11:06:42 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/amd64/conf TB --- 2004-02-29 11:06:42 - /usr/bin/make -B LINT TB --- 2004-02-29 11:06:43 - building LINT kernel TB --- 2004-02-29 11:06:43 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src TB --- 2004-02-29 11:06:43 - /usr/bin/make buildkernel KERNCONF=LINT >>> Kernel build for LINT started on Sun Feb 29 11:06:43 GMT 2004 -------------------------------------------------------------- ===> LINT mkdir -p /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys cd /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/amd64/conf; PATH=/home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/i386/legacy/usr/sbin:/home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/i386/legacy/usr/bin:/home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/i386/legacy/usr/games:/home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/i386/usr/sbin:/home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/i386/usr/bin:/home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/i386/usr/games:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin config -d /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/LINT /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/amd64/conf/LINT FYI: static unit limits for vcoda are set: NVCODA=4 config: Error: device "cy" is unknown config: 1 errors WARNING: unknown option `WATCHDOG' removed from /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/LINT/opt_watchdog.h WARNING: kernel contains GPL contaminated ext2fs filesystem *** Error code 1 Stop in /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src. TB --- 2004-02-29 11:06:43 - WARNING: /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1 TB --- 2004-02-29 11:06:43 - ERROR: failed to build lint kernel TB --- 2004-02-29 11:06:43 - tinderbox aborted From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 29 11:26:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 362FF16A4CE; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:26:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from canning.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1876543D2D; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:26:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@evilpete.dyndns.org) Received: from fw.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by canning.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B7682A8E7; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:26:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@overcee.wemm.org) Received: from overcee.wemm.org (unknown [10.0.0.3]) by fw.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB95E2C1AC; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:26:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@overcee.wemm.org) Received: from overcee.wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by overcee.wemm.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i1TJPvtL073067; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:25:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@overcee.wemm.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by overcee.wemm.org (8.12.11/8.12.10/Submit) id i1TJPu3K073066; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:25:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter) From: Peter Wemm To: obrien@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:25:56 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.6 References: <20040227111802.6E9807303A@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <200402271423.01374.peter@wemm.org> <20040229003423.GB30407@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20040229003423.GB30407@dragon.nuxi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200402291125.56763.peter@wemm.org> cc: amd64@freebsd.org cc: Ruslan Ermilov cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 19:26:10 -0000 On Saturday 28 February 2004 04:34 pm, David O'Brien wrote: > On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 02:23:01PM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote: > > Actually, David has utterly hosed amd64/conf/NOTES. He's spammed > > the working copy with a completely and utterly bogus version that > > he > > NOTES wasn't suspose to exist yet -- we an agreement about it I won't > bring up here. I'll do something about it this weekend. Yes, and the agreement was that you'd actually *do* something with it in the tree. And instead, you've trashed a working version that was actually useful and was complete, with markers as reminders for which drivers still needed to be fixed. Instead, it looks like you spammed an i386 version over the top and got rid of all the markers that I'd placed there. -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 29 11:26:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 362FF16A4CE; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:26:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from canning.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1876543D2D; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:26:08 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@evilpete.dyndns.org) Received: from fw.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by canning.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B7682A8E7; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:26:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@overcee.wemm.org) Received: from overcee.wemm.org (unknown [10.0.0.3]) by fw.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB95E2C1AC; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:26:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@overcee.wemm.org) Received: from overcee.wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by overcee.wemm.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i1TJPvtL073067; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:25:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@overcee.wemm.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by overcee.wemm.org (8.12.11/8.12.10/Submit) id i1TJPu3K073066; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:25:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter) From: Peter Wemm To: obrien@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:25:56 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.6 References: <20040227111802.6E9807303A@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <200402271423.01374.peter@wemm.org> <20040229003423.GB30407@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20040229003423.GB30407@dragon.nuxi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200402291125.56763.peter@wemm.org> cc: amd64@freebsd.org cc: Ruslan Ermilov cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 19:26:10 -0000 On Saturday 28 February 2004 04:34 pm, David O'Brien wrote: > On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 02:23:01PM -0800, Peter Wemm wrote: > > Actually, David has utterly hosed amd64/conf/NOTES. He's spammed > > the working copy with a completely and utterly bogus version that > > he > > NOTES wasn't suspose to exist yet -- we an agreement about it I won't > bring up here. I'll do something about it this weekend. Yes, and the agreement was that you'd actually *do* something with it in the tree. And instead, you've trashed a working version that was actually useful and was complete, with markers as reminders for which drivers still needed to be fixed. Instead, it looks like you spammed an i386 version over the top and got rid of all the markers that I'd placed there. -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 29 11:26:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D86D416A4CE; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:26:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from canning.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F6243D1D; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:26:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@evilpete.dyndns.org) Received: from fw.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by canning.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 935E52A8E7; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:26:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@overcee.wemm.org) Received: from overcee.wemm.org (unknown [10.0.0.3]) by fw.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 587E92C1AF; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:26:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@overcee.wemm.org) Received: from overcee.wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by overcee.wemm.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i1TJQQDl073078; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:26:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@overcee.wemm.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by overcee.wemm.org (8.12.11/8.12.10/Submit) id i1TJQQIr073077; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:26:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter) From: Peter Wemm To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org, obrien@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:26:26 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.6 References: <20040227111802.6E9807303A@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20040227143505.GA2685@ip.net.ua> <20040229003315.GA30407@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20040229003315.GA30407@dragon.nuxi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200402291126.26160.peter@wemm.org> cc: amd64@freebsd.org cc: Ruslan Ermilov Subject: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 19:26:28 -0000 On Saturday 28 February 2004 04:33 pm, David O'Brien wrote: > On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 04:35:05PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 01:34:09PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > > > FreeBSD Tinderbox writes: > > > > FYI: static unit limits for vcoda are set: NVCODA=4 > > > > config: Error: device "cy" is unknown > > > > config: 1 errors > > > > WARNING: kernel contains GPL contaminated ext2fs filesystem > > > > *** Error code 1 > > > > > > Is somebody going to fix this? > > > > David maybe, who brought it up recently to amd64/NOTES? > > I'm fixing it this weekend. Back out your spammed version and actually read what was there. -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 29 11:26:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D86D416A4CE; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:26:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from canning.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9F6243D1D; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:26:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@evilpete.dyndns.org) Received: from fw.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by canning.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 935E52A8E7; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:26:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@overcee.wemm.org) Received: from overcee.wemm.org (unknown [10.0.0.3]) by fw.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 587E92C1AF; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:26:27 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@overcee.wemm.org) Received: from overcee.wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by overcee.wemm.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i1TJQQDl073078; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:26:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@overcee.wemm.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by overcee.wemm.org (8.12.11/8.12.10/Submit) id i1TJQQIr073077; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:26:26 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter) From: Peter Wemm To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org, obrien@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:26:26 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.6 References: <20040227111802.6E9807303A@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <20040227143505.GA2685@ip.net.ua> <20040229003315.GA30407@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20040229003315.GA30407@dragon.nuxi.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200402291126.26160.peter@wemm.org> cc: amd64@freebsd.org cc: Ruslan Ermilov Subject: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 19:26:28 -0000 On Saturday 28 February 2004 04:33 pm, David O'Brien wrote: > On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 04:35:05PM +0200, Ruslan Ermilov wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 01:34:09PM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote: > > > FreeBSD Tinderbox writes: > > > > FYI: static unit limits for vcoda are set: NVCODA=4 > > > > config: Error: device "cy" is unknown > > > > config: 1 errors > > > > WARNING: kernel contains GPL contaminated ext2fs filesystem > > > > *** Error code 1 > > > > > > Is somebody going to fix this? > > > > David maybe, who brought it up recently to amd64/NOTES? > > I'm fixing it this weekend. Back out your spammed version and actually read what was there. -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 29 14:19:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D11F516A4CE for ; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 14:19:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebee.digiware.nl (dsl390.iae.nl [212.61.63.138]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 839DD43D1F for ; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 14:19:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from wjw@withagen.nl) Received: from dual (dual [212.61.27.71]) by freebee.digiware.nl (8.12.10/8.12.9) with SMTP id i1TMHweL057493; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 23:17:58 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wjw@withagen.nl) Message-ID: <005101c3ff12$1af05c80$471b3dd4@dual> From: "Willem Jan Withagen" To: "Henrik W Lund" , References: <4040A9FA.50801@hiof.no> Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 23:19:31 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Subject: Re: Considering an AMD64 system... X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 22:19:50 -0000 You also might take a look at: http://withagen.dyndns.org/FreeBSD/notes/amd64-hardware.html Where I summarised most of the previous replies om similar questions. There's still a lot of questions not answered, but I you find any improvements, they are always welcomed. --WjW ----- Original Message ----- From: "Henrik W Lund" To: Sent: Saturday, February 28, 2004 3:47 PM Subject: Considering an AMD64 system... > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Greetings! > > I'm considering investing in an AMD64-system, mainly for home/desktop > use (gaming, programming for fun and just generally goofing around, > trying stuff out), and as such do not need any high-end dual Opteron > setup. I'm thinking of going in on the low-end (AMD Athlon 64 3000+), > mainly due to financial reasons. Either way, it'll be a major step up > from my current P3 733... > > Now, since I want to run my favourite OS on the system, I want to know > if the amd64 architecture is well supported. I know it says on the > website that amd64 is a Tier 1 architecture, but from reading this > list and checking out docs, it seems as if it's just a teensy bit > unstable. Or is this due to fragility of the hardware (with memory > lockups, freezing and such)? It should be stated that I am not exactly > a newbie when it comes to FreeBSD, but in no way am I a wiz either. I > have a modicum of programming skills, but I doubt it that they'll do > me any good if my system goes down with some cryptic error message. > > Now, if the amd64 is indeed fully supported, this leads me to another > question: what hardware is supported? I'm mainly thinking of > mainboards and their chipsets here, as I reckon most of the regular > hardware (graphics cards, sound cards, etc) are compatible with both > the amd64 and the i386 platform (if I got the wrong idea here, please > tell me!). What chipsets would you recommend? I kinda have my eye on > the nForce chipset, as I understand this is good for multimedia (and > gaming), but I'm open to suggestions. > > Many questions here, any and all answers are welcomed. Thanks in advance! > > Henrik W Lund > Student at Østfold College, > Department of Computer Science. > > PS: please (b)cc: me, as I'm not (yet) a subscriber to this list. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org > > iD8DBQFAQKn6nzC5lcw9P3IRAns7AJ9wQJPCDc9bnaIzwE+8xhA/yehYMACfT8/i > JgUUvumghKidTR0a2zN7fj0= > =kbge > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-amd64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 29 15:10:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B65616A4DD; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 15:10:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebsd-current.sentex.ca (freebsd-current.sentex.ca [64.7.128.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C89B43D31; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 15:10:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: by freebsd-current.sentex.ca (Postfix, from userid 666) id B26E97303A; Sun, 29 Feb 2004 18:10:24 -0500 (EST) Sender: FreeBSD Tinderbox From: FreeBSD Tinderbox To: FreeBSD Tinderbox , , Precedence: bulk Message-Id: <20040229231024.B26E97303A@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 18:10:24 -0500 (EST) Subject: [current tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 29 Feb 2004 23:10:25 -0000 TB --- 2004-02-29 22:13:16 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2004-02-29 22:13:16 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2004-02-29 22:13:16 - checking out the source tree TB --- 2004-02-29 22:13:16 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64 TB --- 2004-02-29 22:13:16 - /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2004-02-29 22:17:10 - building world TB --- 2004-02-29 22:17:10 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src TB --- 2004-02-29 22:17:10 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree >>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims >>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2.3: build tools >>> stage 3: cross tools >>> stage 4.1: building includes >>> stage 4.2: building libraries >>> stage 4.3: make dependencies >>> stage 4.4: building everything.. TB --- 2004-02-29 23:04:11 - building generic kernel TB --- 2004-02-29 23:04:11 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src TB --- 2004-02-29 23:04:11 - /usr/bin/make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC >>> Kernel build for GENERIC started on Sun Feb 29 23:04:11 GMT 2004 >>> Kernel build for GENERIC completed on Sun Feb 29 23:10:23 GMT 2004 TB --- 2004-02-29 23:10:23 - generating LINT kernel config TB --- 2004-02-29 23:10:23 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/amd64/conf TB --- 2004-02-29 23:10:23 - /usr/bin/make -B LINT TB --- 2004-02-29 23:10:23 - building LINT kernel TB --- 2004-02-29 23:10:23 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src TB --- 2004-02-29 23:10:23 - /usr/bin/make buildkernel KERNCONF=LINT >>> Kernel build for LINT started on Sun Feb 29 23:10:23 GMT 2004 -------------------------------------------------------------- ===> LINT mkdir -p /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys cd /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/amd64/conf; PATH=/home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/i386/legacy/usr/sbin:/home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/i386/legacy/usr/bin:/home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/i386/legacy/usr/games:/home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/i386/usr/sbin:/home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/i386/usr/bin:/home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/i386/usr/games:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin config -d /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/LINT /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/amd64/conf/LINT FYI: static unit limits for vcoda are set: NVCODA=4 config: Error: device "cy" is unknown config: 1 errors WARNING: kernel contains GPL contaminated ext2fs filesystem *** Error code 1 Stop in /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src. TB --- 2004-02-29 23:10:24 - WARNING: /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1 TB --- 2004-02-29 23:10:24 - ERROR: failed to build lint kernel TB --- 2004-02-29 23:10:24 - tinderbox aborted From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 1 01:07:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C30FB16A4CE for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 01:07:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8A9E43D2F for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 01:07:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2197oOJ066697; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 01:07:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i2197mfs066696; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 01:07:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 01:07:48 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Henrik W Lund Message-ID: <20040301090748.GA66432@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <4040A9FA.50801@hiof.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4040A9FA.50801@hiof.no> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Considering an AMD64 system... X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 09:07:50 -0000 On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 03:47:22PM +0100, Henrik W Lund wrote: > Now, since I want to run my favourite OS on the system, I want to know > if the amd64 architecture is well supported. I know it says on the > website that amd64 is a Tier 1 architecture, but from reading this > list and checking out docs, it seems as if it's just a teensy bit > unstable. Precisly what posts and docs give you that impression? It is VERY stable. No panics, no locks, etc... beyond FreeBSD/i386. > Or is this due to fragility of the hardware (with memory > lockups, freezing and such)? Uh, NO. See above. > Now, if the amd64 is indeed fully supported, this leads me to another > question: what hardware is supported? I'm mainly thinking of > mainboards and their chipsets here, as I reckon most of the regular Everything. All amd64 motherboards are supported. > the amd64 and the i386 platform (if I got the wrong idea here, please > tell me!). What chipsets would you recommend? I kinda have my eye on > the nForce chipset, as I understand this is good for multimedia (and > gaming), but I'm open to suggestions. nForce3 systems have crappy BIOS's, stay away from them. (note, the crappiness isn't any worse than many typical 32-bit x86 BIOS's) With the memory controller being in the CPU, there is no benefit to the nVidia nForce chipset over other chipsets. In fact, the Via K8T800 chipset is benchmarking the fastest. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 1 03:19:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF73516A4DD; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 03:18:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebsd-current.sentex.ca (freebsd-current.sentex.ca [64.7.128.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD98943D31; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 03:18:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: by freebsd-current.sentex.ca (Postfix, from userid 666) id 106F37303A; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 06:18:58 -0500 (EST) Sender: FreeBSD Tinderbox From: FreeBSD Tinderbox To: FreeBSD Tinderbox , , Precedence: bulk Message-Id: <20040301111858.106F37303A@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 06:18:58 -0500 (EST) Subject: [current tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 11:19:00 -0000 TB --- 2004-03-01 10:21:51 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2004-03-01 10:21:51 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2004-03-01 10:21:51 - checking out the source tree TB --- 2004-03-01 10:21:51 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64 TB --- 2004-03-01 10:21:51 - /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2004-03-01 10:25:46 - building world TB --- 2004-03-01 10:25:46 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src TB --- 2004-03-01 10:25:46 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree >>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims >>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2.3: build tools >>> stage 3: cross tools >>> stage 4.1: building includes >>> stage 4.2: building libraries >>> stage 4.3: make dependencies >>> stage 4.4: building everything.. TB --- 2004-03-01 11:12:37 - building generic kernel TB --- 2004-03-01 11:12:37 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src TB --- 2004-03-01 11:12:37 - /usr/bin/make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC >>> Kernel build for GENERIC started on Mon Mar 1 11:12:37 GMT 2004 >>> Kernel build for GENERIC completed on Mon Mar 1 11:18:57 GMT 2004 TB --- 2004-03-01 11:18:57 - generating LINT kernel config TB --- 2004-03-01 11:18:57 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/amd64/conf TB --- 2004-03-01 11:18:57 - /usr/bin/make -B LINT TB --- 2004-03-01 11:18:58 - building LINT kernel TB --- 2004-03-01 11:18:58 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src TB --- 2004-03-01 11:18:58 - /usr/bin/make buildkernel KERNCONF=LINT >>> Kernel build for LINT started on Mon Mar 1 11:18:58 GMT 2004 -------------------------------------------------------------- ===> LINT mkdir -p /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys cd /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/amd64/conf; PATH=/home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/i386/legacy/usr/sbin:/home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/i386/legacy/usr/bin:/home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/i386/legacy/usr/games:/home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/i386/usr/sbin:/home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/i386/usr/bin:/home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/i386/usr/games:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin config -d /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/LINT /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/amd64/conf/LINT FYI: static unit limits for vcoda are set: NVCODA=4 config: Error: device "cy" is unknown config: 1 errors WARNING: kernel contains GPL contaminated ext2fs filesystem *** Error code 1 Stop in /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src. TB --- 2004-03-01 11:18:58 - WARNING: /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1 TB --- 2004-03-01 11:18:58 - ERROR: failed to build lint kernel TB --- 2004-03-01 11:18:58 - tinderbox aborted From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 1 11:01:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CCAB16A4EA for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 11:01:40 -0800 (PST) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1502B43D39 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 11:01:40 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (peter@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i21J1dbv054036 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 11:01:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i21J1d6M054030 for freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 11:01:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 11:01:39 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200403011901.i21J1d6M054030@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: peter set sender to owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Current problem reports assigned to you X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 19:01:40 -0000 Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2003/11/26] amd64/59713 amd64 Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85E8016A4CE; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 15:18:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebsd-current.sentex.ca (freebsd-current.sentex.ca [64.7.128.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E89E43D2D; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 15:18:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: by freebsd-current.sentex.ca (Postfix, from userid 666) id B75257303A; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 18:18:58 -0500 (EST) Sender: FreeBSD Tinderbox From: FreeBSD Tinderbox To: FreeBSD Tinderbox , , Precedence: bulk Message-Id: <20040301231858.B75257303A@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 18:18:58 -0500 (EST) Subject: [current tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 23:18:59 -0000 TB --- 2004-03-01 22:21:53 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2004-03-01 22:21:53 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2004-03-01 22:21:53 - checking out the source tree TB --- 2004-03-01 22:21:53 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64 TB --- 2004-03-01 22:21:53 - /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2004-03-01 22:25:46 - building world TB --- 2004-03-01 22:25:46 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src TB --- 2004-03-01 22:25:46 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree >>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims >>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2.3: build tools >>> stage 3: cross tools >>> stage 4.1: building includes >>> stage 4.2: building libraries >>> stage 4.3: make dependencies >>> stage 4.4: building everything.. TB --- 2004-03-01 23:12:34 - building generic kernel TB --- 2004-03-01 23:12:34 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src TB --- 2004-03-01 23:12:34 - /usr/bin/make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC >>> Kernel build for GENERIC started on Mon Mar 1 23:12:34 GMT 2004 >>> Kernel build for GENERIC completed on Mon Mar 1 23:18:57 GMT 2004 TB --- 2004-03-01 23:18:57 - generating LINT kernel config TB --- 2004-03-01 23:18:57 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/amd64/conf TB --- 2004-03-01 23:18:57 - /usr/bin/make -B LINT TB --- 2004-03-01 23:18:57 - building LINT kernel TB --- 2004-03-01 23:18:57 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src TB --- 2004-03-01 23:18:57 - /usr/bin/make buildkernel KERNCONF=LINT >>> Kernel build for LINT started on Mon Mar 1 23:18:57 GMT 2004 -------------------------------------------------------------- ===> LINT mkdir -p /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys cd /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/amd64/conf; PATH=/home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/i386/legacy/usr/sbin:/home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/i386/legacy/usr/bin:/home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/i386/legacy/usr/games:/home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/i386/usr/sbin:/home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/i386/usr/bin:/home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/i386/usr/games:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin config -d /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/LINT /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/amd64/conf/LINT FYI: static unit limits for vcoda are set: NVCODA=4 config: Error: device "cy" is unknown config: 1 errors WARNING: kernel contains GPL contaminated ext2fs filesystem *** Error code 1 Stop in /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src. TB --- 2004-03-01 23:18:58 - WARNING: /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1 TB --- 2004-03-01 23:18:58 - ERROR: failed to build lint kernel TB --- 2004-03-01 23:18:58 - tinderbox aborted From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 1 15:29:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 832D816A4CF for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 15:29:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from tx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk (tx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0452C43D1F for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 15:29:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk) Received: from scan2.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.162] helo=localhost) by tx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AxwqM-0003PC-JX for amd64@freebsd.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 23:29:02 +0000 Received: from rx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.2.161]) by localhost (scan2.oucs.ox.ac.uk [163.1.2.162]) (amavisd-new, port 25) with ESMTP id 12721-10 for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 23:29:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gateway.wadham.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.161.253]) by rx2.oucs.ox.ac.uk with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AxwqL-0003Ou-9H for amd64@freebsd.org; Mon, 01 Mar 2004 23:29:01 +0000 Received: (qmail 23642 invoked by uid 0); 1 Mar 2004 23:28:48 -0000 Received: from colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk by gateway by uid 71 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (sweep: 2.14/3.71. spamassassin: 2.53. Clear:. Processed in 1.717901 secs); 01 Mar 2004 23:28:48 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk via gateway X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.16 (Clear:. Processed in 1.717901 secs) Received: from dhcp1131.wadham.ox.ac.uk (HELO piii600.wadham.ox.ac.uk) (163.1.161.131) by gateway.wadham.ox.ac.uk with SMTP; 1 Mar 2004 23:28:46 -0000 Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.1.20040301232548.03a0c7b8@imap.sfu.ca> X-Sender: cperciva@imap.sfu.ca (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.1.1 Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 23:28:40 +0000 To: FreeBSD Tinderbox From: Colin Percival In-Reply-To: <20040301231858.B75257303A@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> References: <20040301231858.B75257303A@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed cc: amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 23:29:03 -0000 At 23:18 01/03/2004, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: >config: Error: device "cy" is unknown >config: 1 errors If there's going to be a broken sys/amd64/conf/NOTES in the tree, could someone please shut down the AMD64 tinderbox for now? Colin Percival From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 1 15:41:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAB9116A4CE; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 15:41:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from corbulon.video-collage.com (corbulon.video-collage.com [64.35.99.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 754DD43D1D; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 15:41:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from 250-217.customer.cloud9.net (195-11.customer.cloud9.net [168.100.195.11])i21NfI8X016456 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 1 Mar 2004 18:41:24 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from localhost (mteterin@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i21NfCw3049249; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 18:41:12 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com) From: Mikhail Teterin Organization: Murex N.A. To: amd64@FreeBSD.org, ia64@FreeBSD.org Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 18:41:12 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200403011841.12312@misha-mx.virtual-estates.net> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 Subject: amr(4)'s ioctl-s and LSI's binary only RAID manager utility X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Mar 2004 23:41:26 -0000 Hello! Can I, please, call your attention to http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/63155 The simple patch will allow amd64 (probably -- ia64 too) to use the MEGAMGR utility released by LSI (aka AMI) for FreeBSD. Thanks! -mi From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 1 16:13:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D379616A4CE for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 16:13:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from bsdone.bsdwins.com (www.bsdwins.com [192.58.184.33]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CEC543D2D for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 16:13:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jwd@bsdwins.com) Received: from bsdone.bsdwins.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bsdone.bsdwins.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i2207ofe004621; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 19:07:51 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jwd@www.bsdwins.com) Received: (from jwd@localhost) by bsdone.bsdwins.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i2207owf004620; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 19:07:50 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jwd) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 19:07:50 -0500 From: John To: Colin Percival Message-ID: <20040302000750.GA4595@BSDWins.Com> References: <20040301231858.B75257303A@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <6.0.1.1.1.20040301232548.03a0c7b8@imap.sfu.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6.0.1.1.1.20040301232548.03a0c7b8@imap.sfu.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 00:13:58 -0000 I support the box, des owns the process... I can drop the old notes back in... anyone disagree? -John ----- Colin Percival's Original Message ----- > At 23:18 01/03/2004, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: > >config: Error: device "cy" is unknown > >config: 1 errors > > If there's going to be a broken sys/amd64/conf/NOTES in the > tree, could someone please shut down the AMD64 tinderbox for > now? > > Colin Percival From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 1 17:24:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CC9916A4CE; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 17:24:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4C3943D2F; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 17:24:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id 2EBA95309; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 02:24:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id C6F3B5308; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 02:23:55 +0100 (CET) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 2602) id 16A1B33C6E; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 02:23:54 +0100 (CET) To: Colin Percival References: <20040301231858.B75257303A@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <6.0.1.1.1.20040301232548.03a0c7b8@imap.sfu.ca> From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 02:23:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: <6.0.1.1.1.20040301232548.03a0c7b8@imap.sfu.ca> (Colin Percival's message of "Mon, 01 Mar 2004 23:28:40 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.090024 (Oort Gnus v0.24) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.63 cc: amd64@freebsd.org cc: FreeBSD Tinderbox Subject: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 01:24:04 -0000 Colin Percival writes: > At 23:18 01/03/2004, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: > > config: Error: device "cy" is unknown > > config: 1 errors > If there's going to be a broken sys/amd64/conf/NOTES in the > tree, could someone please shut down the AMD64 tinderbox for > now? Shooting the messenger is rarely the best option. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 1 17:45:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2829216A4CE for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 17:45:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from tx0.oucs.ox.ac.uk (tx0.oucs.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A52FD43D2D for ; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 17:45:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk) Received: from scan0.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.162] helo=localhost) by tx0.oucs.ox.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AxyyP-00087w-F9 for amd64@freebsd.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2004 01:45:29 +0000 Received: from rx0.oucs.ox.ac.uk ([129.67.1.161]) by localhost (scan0.oucs.ox.ac.uk [129.67.1.162]) (amavisd-new, port 25) with ESMTP id 30917-07 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 01:45:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gateway.wadham.ox.ac.uk ([163.1.161.253]) by rx0.oucs.ox.ac.uk with smtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AxyyP-00087q-1j for amd64@freebsd.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2004 01:45:29 +0000 Received: (qmail 32623 invoked by uid 0); 2 Mar 2004 01:45:29 -0000 Received: from colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk by gateway by uid 71 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (sweep: 2.14/3.71. spamassassin: 2.53. Clear:. Processed in 1.529252 secs); 02 Mar 2004 01:45:29 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk via gateway X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.16 (Clear:. Processed in 1.529252 secs) Received: from dhcp1131.wadham.ox.ac.uk (HELO piii600.wadham.ox.ac.uk) (163.1.161.131) by gateway.wadham.ox.ac.uk with SMTP; 2 Mar 2004 01:45:27 -0000 Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.1.20040302013255.03a48298@imap.sfu.ca> X-Sender: cperciva@imap.sfu.ca (Unverified) X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.1.1 Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 01:45:24 +0000 To: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ) From: Colin Percival In-Reply-To: References: <20040301231858.B75257303A@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <6.0.1.1.1.20040301232548.03a0c7b8@imap.sfu.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable cc: amd64@freebsd.org cc: FreeBSD Tinderbox cc: Colin Percival Subject: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 01:45:31 -0000 At 01:23 02/03/2004, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: >Colin Percival writes: > > If there's going to be a broken sys/amd64/conf/NOTES in the > > tree, could someone please shut down the AMD64 tinderbox for > > now? > >Shooting the messenger is rarely the best option. Absolutely. The best option would be to fix NOTES; but it's been twelve days with no sign of that happening, so shooting the messenger is looking like an increasingly enticing option. Colin Percival From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 1 19:12:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F64A16A4CE; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 19:12:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from mtaw6.prodigy.net (mtaw6.prodigy.net [64.164.98.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 130A843D31; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 19:12:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (b54d27750ee1fbe93a25159610e0e441@adsl-67-119-53-203.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.119.53.203]) by mtaw6.prodigy.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i223BTEn003912; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 19:11:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BE12C511F7; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 19:12:26 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 1 Mar 2004 19:12:26 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: amd64@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20040302031226.GA670@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: sos@FreeBSD.org Subject: NFS or ATA driver causes FS corruption? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 03:12:28 -0000 --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline I'm seemingly able to repeat this here (/home/ncvs is a link to /xor/mnt2/ncvs): rot26# mount xor:/mnt2 /xor/mnt2 rot26# cd /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/gtk12 rot26# cvs -Rq diff -u cvs diff: in directory .: cvs diff: ignoring CVS/Root because it specifies a non-existent repository /home/ncvs cvs diff: No CVSROOT specified! Please use the `-d' option cvs [diff aborted]: or set the CVSROOT environment variable. rot26# ls /xor/mnt2 ls: /xor/mnt2: Input/output error rot26# ls /xor mnt2 mnt3 mnt4 mnt6 rot26# ls -l /xor ls: mnt2: Input/output error total 6 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Feb 28 22:37 mnt3 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Feb 28 20:32 mnt4 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Feb 28 23:50 mnt6 rot26# I rebooted and retried and the same thing happened again. Also, I'm seeing buffers not being flushed when I attempt a clean shutdown. There are error messages from the ATA driver logged during shutdown; I also see this on the two amd64 package machines at runtime, for example: ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA interrupt was seen but timeout fired LBA=9440 ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA interrupt was seen but timeout fired LBA=20736 ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA interrupt was seen but timeout fired LBA=117088 ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA interrupt was seen but timeout fired LBA=119760 ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA interrupt was seen but timeout fired LBA=49736 ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA interrupt was seen but timeout fired LBA=118184 ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA interrupt was seen but timeout fired LBA=211232 ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA interrupt was seen but timeout fired LBA=48336 swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer: device: ad0d, blkno: 36509, size: 4096 swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer: device: ad0d, blkno: 6033, size: 12288 ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA interrupt was seen but timeout fired LBA=35240 ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA interrupt was seen but timeout fired LBA=20904 ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA interrupt was seen but timeout fired LBA=117560 ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA interrupt was seen but timeout fired LBA=206664 ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA interrupt was seen but timeout fired LBA=30312 ad0: WARNING - READ_DMA interrupt was seen but timeout fired LBA=35593400 ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA interrupt was seen but timeout fired LBA=174496 ad0: WARNING - READ_DMA interrupt was seen but timeout fired LBA=34345128 ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA interrupt was seen but timeout fired LBA=384704 This machine has the following ATA controller: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT #3: Sun Feb 29 17:41:39 PST 2004 ... atapci0: port 0xd000-0xd00f at device 7.1 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata0: [MPSAFE] ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 ata1: [MPSAFE] Has anyone else seen this? Kris --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAQ/uaWry0BWjoQKURAsi7AJ9CqOb4NJJc4HOacyda1CWQDzgaMgCeOxlE udTlCb+DuuUE2W+xiSu3DR4= =2Wwx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --J2SCkAp4GZ/dPZZf-- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Mar 1 22:28:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3E6916A4CE; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 22:28:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from spider.deepcore.dk (cpe.atm2-0-53484.0x50a6c9a6.abnxx9.customer.tele.dk [80.166.201.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F84743D2F; Mon, 1 Mar 2004 22:28:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sos@DeepCore.dk) Received: from DeepCore.dk (sos.deepcore.dk [194.192.25.130]) by spider.deepcore.dk (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i226PY0G089461; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 07:25:34 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sos@DeepCore.dk) Message-ID: <4044297F.1080701@DeepCore.dk> Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 07:28:15 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?S=F8ren_Schmidt?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6b) Gecko/20040126 Thunderbird/0.4 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <20040302031226.GA670@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20040302031226.GA670@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-mail-scanned: by DeepCore Virus & Spam killer v1.4 cc: amd64@FreeBSD.ORG cc: sos@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NFS or ATA driver causes FS corruption? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 06:28:19 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA interrupt was seen but timeout fired LBA=9440 > ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA interrupt was seen but timeout fired LBA=20736 > ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA interrupt was seen but timeout fired LBA=117088 > ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA interrupt was seen but timeout fired LBA=119760 > ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA interrupt was seen but timeout fired LBA=49736 > ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA interrupt was seen but timeout fired LBA=118184 > ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA interrupt was seen but timeout fired LBA=211232 > ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA interrupt was seen but timeout fired LBA=48336 > swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer: device: ad0d, blkno: 36509, size: 4096 > swap_pager: indefinite wait buffer: device: ad0d, blkno: 6033, size: 12288 > ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA interrupt was seen but timeout fired LBA=35240 > ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA interrupt was seen but timeout fired LBA=20904 > ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA interrupt was seen but timeout fired LBA=117560 > ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA interrupt was seen but timeout fired LBA=206664 > ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA interrupt was seen but timeout fired LBA=30312 > ad0: WARNING - READ_DMA interrupt was seen but timeout fired LBA=35593400 > ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA interrupt was seen but timeout fired LBA=174496 > ad0: WARNING - READ_DMA interrupt was seen but timeout fired LBA=34345128 > ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA interrupt was seen but timeout fired LBA=384704 The above means that *something* is stomping on the taskqueue that should take care of returning finished requests to the system (they are finished as the interrupt has been seen). I can avoid this by putting it all back in interrupt context again as it was before, but it would be better to get whatever it is that causes this fixed.. > This machine has the following ATA controller: > > FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT #3: Sun Feb 29 17:41:39 PST 2004 > ... > atapci0: port 0xd000-0xd00f at device 7.1 on pci0 > ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 > ata0: [MPSAFE] > ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 > ata1: [MPSAFE] > > Has anyone else seen this? I've got the same one in the amd64 machine I've got here, no problems whatsoever, I can beat the snot out of it and it doesn't show this behavior, it "just works" (tm). But I'm not using NFS here at all since that has not worked for me for a looong time, but thats probably just my Murphy field.... -- -Søren From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 2 03:18:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09BE716A4CE; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 03:18:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebsd-current.sentex.ca (freebsd-current.sentex.ca [64.7.128.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D021043D2F; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 03:18:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: by freebsd-current.sentex.ca (Postfix, from userid 666) id 1F7AE7303A; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 06:18:55 -0500 (EST) Sender: FreeBSD Tinderbox From: FreeBSD Tinderbox To: FreeBSD Tinderbox , , Precedence: bulk Message-Id: <20040302111855.1F7AE7303A@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 06:18:55 -0500 (EST) Subject: [current tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 11:18:56 -0000 TB --- 2004-03-02 10:21:52 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2004-03-02 10:21:52 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2004-03-02 10:21:52 - checking out the source tree TB --- 2004-03-02 10:21:52 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64 TB --- 2004-03-02 10:21:52 - /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2004-03-02 10:25:47 - building world TB --- 2004-03-02 10:25:47 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src TB --- 2004-03-02 10:25:47 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree >>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims >>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2.3: build tools >>> stage 3: cross tools >>> stage 4.1: building includes >>> stage 4.2: building libraries >>> stage 4.3: make dependencies >>> stage 4.4: building everything.. TB --- 2004-03-02 11:12:32 - building generic kernel TB --- 2004-03-02 11:12:32 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src TB --- 2004-03-02 11:12:32 - /usr/bin/make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC >>> Kernel build for GENERIC started on Tue Mar 2 11:12:32 GMT 2004 >>> Kernel build for GENERIC completed on Tue Mar 2 11:18:54 GMT 2004 TB --- 2004-03-02 11:18:54 - generating LINT kernel config TB --- 2004-03-02 11:18:54 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/amd64/conf TB --- 2004-03-02 11:18:54 - /usr/bin/make -B LINT TB --- 2004-03-02 11:18:54 - building LINT kernel TB --- 2004-03-02 11:18:54 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src TB --- 2004-03-02 11:18:54 - /usr/bin/make buildkernel KERNCONF=LINT >>> Kernel build for LINT started on Tue Mar 2 11:18:54 GMT 2004 -------------------------------------------------------------- ===> LINT mkdir -p /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys cd /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/amd64/conf; PATH=/home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/i386/legacy/usr/sbin:/home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/i386/legacy/usr/bin:/home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/i386/legacy/usr/games:/home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/i386/usr/sbin:/home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/i386/usr/bin:/home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/i386/usr/games:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin config -d /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/LINT /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/amd64/conf/LINT FYI: static unit limits for vcoda are set: NVCODA=4 config: Error: device "cy" is unknown config: 1 errors WARNING: kernel contains GPL contaminated ext2fs filesystem *** Error code 1 Stop in /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src. TB --- 2004-03-02 11:18:54 - WARNING: /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1 TB --- 2004-03-02 11:18:54 - ERROR: failed to build lint kernel TB --- 2004-03-02 11:18:54 - tinderbox aborted From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 2 08:48:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6326E16A4CE; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 08:48:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from canning.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 500FF43D1D; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 08:48:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@evilpete.dyndns.org) Received: from fw.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by canning.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 042022A8DA; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 08:48:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@overcee.wemm.org) Received: from overcee.wemm.org (unknown [10.0.0.3]) by fw.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC62B2C1AF; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 08:48:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@overcee.wemm.org) Received: from overcee.wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by overcee.wemm.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i22Gmpsp000151; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 08:48:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@overcee.wemm.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by overcee.wemm.org (8.12.11/8.12.10/Submit) id i22Gmj9G000150; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 08:48:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter) From: Peter Wemm To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 08:48:45 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.6 References: <20040301231858.B75257303A@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <6.0.1.1.1.20040302013255.03a48298@imap.sfu.ca> In-Reply-To: <6.0.1.1.1.20040302013255.03a48298@imap.sfu.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200403020848.45430.peter@wemm.org> cc: amd64@freebsd.org cc: FreeBSD Tinderbox cc: Colin Percival Subject: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 16:48:53 -0000 On Monday 01 March 2004 05:45 pm, Colin Percival wrote: > At 01:23 02/03/2004, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > >Colin Percival writes: > > > If there's going to be a broken sys/amd64/conf/NOTES in the > > > tree, could someone please shut down the AMD64 tinderbox for > > > now? > > > >Shooting the messenger is rarely the best option. > > Absolutely. The best option would be to fix NOTES; but it's > been twelve days with no sign of that happening, so shooting > the messenger is looking like an increasingly enticing option. > > Colin Percival It looks like David's working on it again. =2D-=20 Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 2 08:48:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6326E16A4CE; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 08:48:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from canning.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 500FF43D1D; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 08:48:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@evilpete.dyndns.org) Received: from fw.wemm.org (canning.wemm.org [192.203.228.65]) by canning.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 042022A8DA; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 08:48:53 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@overcee.wemm.org) Received: from overcee.wemm.org (unknown [10.0.0.3]) by fw.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC62B2C1AF; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 08:48:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@overcee.wemm.org) Received: from overcee.wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by overcee.wemm.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i22Gmpsp000151; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 08:48:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter@overcee.wemm.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by overcee.wemm.org (8.12.11/8.12.10/Submit) id i22Gmj9G000150; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 08:48:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from peter) From: Peter Wemm To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 08:48:45 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.6 References: <20040301231858.B75257303A@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> <6.0.1.1.1.20040302013255.03a48298@imap.sfu.ca> In-Reply-To: <6.0.1.1.1.20040302013255.03a48298@imap.sfu.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200403020848.45430.peter@wemm.org> cc: amd64@freebsd.org cc: FreeBSD Tinderbox cc: Colin Percival Subject: Re: [current tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 16:48:53 -0000 On Monday 01 March 2004 05:45 pm, Colin Percival wrote: > At 01:23 02/03/2004, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > >Colin Percival writes: > > > If there's going to be a broken sys/amd64/conf/NOTES in the > > > tree, could someone please shut down the AMD64 tinderbox for > > > now? > > > >Shooting the messenger is rarely the best option. > > Absolutely. The best option would be to fix NOTES; but it's > been twelve days with no sign of that happening, so shooting > the messenger is looking like an increasingly enticing option. > > Colin Percival It looks like David's working on it again. =2D-=20 Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 2 12:37:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CFBC16A4CE; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 12:37:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.ncsa.uiuc.edu (mail.ncsa.uiuc.edu [141.142.2.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A3F43D2F; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 12:37:36 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from koziol@ncsa.uiuc.edu) X-Envelope-From: koziol@ncsa.uiuc.edu X-Envelope-To: current@freebsd.org Received: from sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu (sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu [141.142.96.70]) by mail.ncsa.uiuc.edu (8.11.7/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i22KbZO02954; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 14:37:35 -0600 Received: from sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i22KbZ5D051606; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 14:37:35 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from koziol@sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu) Received: (from koziol@localhost) by sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i22KbZYX051605; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 14:37:35 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from koziol) From: Quincey Koziol Message-Id: <200403022037.i22KbZYX051605@sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu> To: amd64@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 14:37:35 -0600 (CST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99f (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Help getting to Current X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 20:37:38 -0000 Hi! I've recently installed FreeBSD 5.1 on a new dual-opteron PC (an MSI K8T Master-FAR2 motherboard). However, I'm having trouble getting current. The pre-built cvsup binary I installed with pkg_add fails with this error: ELF interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found Abort Are there any good workarounds for getting the latest current source? I've grabbed the 5.2.1 release /usr/src, but that's failing like this: cc -O -pipe -DLINEMODE -DUSE_TERMIO -DDIAGNOSTICS -DOLD_ENVIRON -DENV_HACK -I/usr/src/libexec/telnetd/../../contrib/telnet -DINET6 -DAUTHENTICATION -DENCRYPTION -DKRB5 -DFORWARD -Dnet_write=telnet_net_write -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -Wno-uninitialized -o telnetd global.o slc.o state.o sys_term.o telnetd.o termstat.o utility.o authenc.o -lutil -ltermcap /usr/obj/usr/src/libexec/telnetd/../../lib/libtelnet/libtelnet.a -lmp -lcrypto -lcrypt -lpam -lkrb5 -lasn1 -lroken -lcom_err authenc.o: In function `net_encrypt': authenc.o(.text+0x36): undefined reference to `nclearto' authenc.o(.text+0x3f): undefined reference to `nclearto' authenc.o(.text+0x6e): undefined reference to `nclearto' *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/libexec/telnetd. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/libexec. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. Help! :-) Quincey From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 2 12:52:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B461916A4CF for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 12:52:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from pandora.cs.kun.nl (pandora.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D15BA43D31 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 12:52:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from adridg@cs.kun.nl) Received: from odin.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.33] (helo=localhost) by pandora.cs.kun.nl (8.12.10/3.65) with ESMTP id i22Kq1Ft013274 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 21:52:01 +0100 (MET) From: Adriaan de Groot To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 21:52:00 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.51 References: <200403022037.i22KbZYX051605@sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu> In-Reply-To: <200403022037.i22KbZYX051605@sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200403022152.01299.adridg@cs.kun.nl> Subject: Re: Help getting to Current X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 20:52:03 -0000 =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 02 March 2004 21:37, Quincey Koziol wrote: > I've recently installed FreeBSD 5.1 on a new dual-opteron PC (an MSI > K8T Master-FAR2 motherboard). However, I'm having trouble getting curren= t. > The pre-built cvsup binary I installed with pkg_add fails with this erro= r: > ELF interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found Do watch out mixing i386 and amd64 binaries - although it works reasonably= =20 well, I'm told. There's a cvsup binary for amd64 out there - check the=20 archives of this list. It has issues with compression though, so disable=20 compression in your supfile. =2D --=20 pub 1024D/FEA2A3FE 2002-06-18 Adriaan de Groot Would you like a freem? =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFARPPxdqzuAf6io/4RAqA0AJ9ECyCaGcXZMjowAMcdUoaQ8iReXACfaejT RTAwaSr4MGPVL1kvJnALOv0=3D =3DvuVs =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 2 13:14:03 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC8AC16A4CE for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 13:14:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from mtaw6.prodigy.net (mtaw6.prodigy.net [64.164.98.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C989243D1D for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 13:14:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (44baf0f6f3888deba2fd23596b483841@adsl-67-119-53-203.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [67.119.53.203]) by mtaw6.prodigy.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i22LCxEn015486; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 13:13:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9F482535A5; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 13:13:56 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 13:13:56 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Adriaan de Groot Message-ID: <20040302211356.GB6755@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <200403022037.i22KbZYX051605@sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu> <200403022152.01299.adridg@cs.kun.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cmJC7u66zC7hs+87" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200403022152.01299.adridg@cs.kun.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help getting to Current X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 21:14:04 -0000 --cmJC7u66zC7hs+87 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 09:52:00PM +0100, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > On Tuesday 02 March 2004 21:37, Quincey Koziol wrote: > > I've recently installed FreeBSD 5.1 on a new dual-opteron PC (an MSI > > K8T Master-FAR2 motherboard). However, I'm having trouble getting current. > > The pre-built cvsup binary I installed with pkg_add fails with this error: > > ELF interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found You're trying to run a binary built for 5.2 against 5.1. This does not work, as you have discovered. Your best bet is to update to 5.2.1, since amd64 support is much improved. Kris --cmJC7u66zC7hs+87 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFARPkUWry0BWjoQKURAtraAJ0QhB1Hv50Ut0Lxzitava70+HbXTwCgkdua rz54dZTkPIvgxT9cTZVdHPk= =Ci1Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cmJC7u66zC7hs+87-- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 2 15:18:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5D1916A4D0; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 15:18:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from freebsd-current.sentex.ca (freebsd-current.sentex.ca [64.7.128.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F3D343D2F; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 15:18:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tinderbox@freebsd.org) Received: by freebsd-current.sentex.ca (Postfix, from userid 666) id EB7017303A; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 18:18:49 -0500 (EST) Sender: FreeBSD Tinderbox From: FreeBSD Tinderbox To: FreeBSD Tinderbox , , Precedence: bulk Message-Id: <20040302231849.EB7017303A@freebsd-current.sentex.ca> Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 18:18:49 -0500 (EST) Subject: [current tinderbox] failure on amd64/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 23:18:51 -0000 TB --- 2004-03-02 22:21:50 - tinderbox 2.3 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2004-03-02 22:21:50 - starting CURRENT tinderbox run for amd64/amd64 TB --- 2004-03-02 22:21:50 - checking out the source tree TB --- 2004-03-02 22:21:50 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64 TB --- 2004-03-02 22:21:50 - /usr/bin/cvs -f -R -q -d/home/ncvs update -Pd -A src TB --- 2004-03-02 22:25:45 - building world TB --- 2004-03-02 22:25:45 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src TB --- 2004-03-02 22:25:45 - /usr/bin/make -B buildworld >>> Rebuilding the temporary build tree >>> stage 1.1: legacy release compatibility shims >>> stage 1.2: bootstrap tools >>> stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree >>> stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree >>> stage 2.3: build tools >>> stage 3: cross tools >>> stage 4.1: building includes >>> stage 4.2: building libraries >>> stage 4.3: make dependencies >>> stage 4.4: building everything.. TB --- 2004-03-02 23:12:34 - building generic kernel TB --- 2004-03-02 23:12:34 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src TB --- 2004-03-02 23:12:34 - /usr/bin/make buildkernel KERNCONF=GENERIC >>> Kernel build for GENERIC started on Tue Mar 2 23:12:34 GMT 2004 >>> Kernel build for GENERIC completed on Tue Mar 2 23:18:49 GMT 2004 TB --- 2004-03-02 23:18:49 - generating LINT kernel config TB --- 2004-03-02 23:18:49 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/amd64/conf TB --- 2004-03-02 23:18:49 - /usr/bin/make -B LINT TB --- 2004-03-02 23:18:49 - building LINT kernel TB --- 2004-03-02 23:18:49 - cd /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src TB --- 2004-03-02 23:18:49 - /usr/bin/make buildkernel KERNCONF=LINT >>> Kernel build for LINT started on Tue Mar 2 23:18:49 GMT 2004 -------------------------------------------------------------- ===> LINT mkdir -p /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys cd /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/amd64/conf; PATH=/home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/i386/legacy/usr/sbin:/home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/i386/legacy/usr/bin:/home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/i386/legacy/usr/games:/home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/i386/usr/sbin:/home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/i386/usr/bin:/home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/i386/usr/games:/sbin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin config -d /home/tinderbox/sandbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/obj/amd64/other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/LINT /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src/sys/amd64/conf/LINT FYI: static unit limits for vcoda are set: NVCODA=4 config: Error: device "cy" is unknown config: 1 errors WARNING: kernel contains GPL contaminated ext2fs filesystem *** Error code 1 Stop in /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /other/tinderbox/CURRENT/amd64/amd64/src. TB --- 2004-03-02 23:18:49 - WARNING: /usr/bin/make returned exit code 1 TB --- 2004-03-02 23:18:49 - ERROR: failed to build lint kernel TB --- 2004-03-02 23:18:49 - tinderbox aborted From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 2 15:50:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63B5616A4CE for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 15:50:31 -0800 (PST) Received: from ojoink.com (unknown [216.65.123.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58C2543D1D for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 15:50:29 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from amd64list@jpgsworld.com) Received: (qmail 10342 invoked by uid 89); 2 Mar 2004 23:48:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO MAINBX.jpgsworld.com) (amd64list@jpgsworld.com@67.172.167.223) by host180.ojoink.com with SMTP; 2 Mar 2004 23:48:52 -0000 Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20040302154638.02aa3e18@66.250.109.241> X-Sender: amd64list@jpgsworld.com@mail.ojoink.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 15:50:24 -0800 To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org From: JG Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 23:50:31 -0000 From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 2 15:59:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 950EF16A4CE for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 15:59:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from ojoink.com (unknown [216.65.123.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A2F43D1F for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 15:59:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from amd64list@jpgsworld.com) Received: (qmail 10835 invoked by uid 89); 2 Mar 2004 23:57:53 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO MAINBX.jpgsworld.com) (amd64list@jpgsworld.com@67.172.167.223) by host180.ojoink.com with SMTP; 2 Mar 2004 23:57:53 -0000 Message-Id: <5.2.0.9.2.20040302155539.02aaee48@66.250.109.241> X-Sender: amd64list@jpgsworld.com@mail.ojoink.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.2.0.9 Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 15:59:21 -0800 To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org From: JG Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: High volume AMD64 MySQL server -- FreeBSD vs Linux? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2004 23:59:30 -0000 Hello AMD64 development team, I am a long time FreeBSD user and my current project requires me to build a stable, high volume MySQL database server. I know someone who is currently running a very high volume Linux based dual opteron MySQL server. I have heard and read bad things about running MySQL on intel based FreeBSD systems -- espeically those before the 5.x branch. I guess it had something to do with how threading is performed on FreeBSD vs on Linux. Does this threading issue still apply with FreeBSD/AMD64? Do you think the FreeBSD/AMD64 project is ready to be used as the OS for a high volume production MySQL server? If the FreeBSD AMD64 team thinks it is worth it, I would like to offer to conduct some assisted benchmark tests on the system I have built (see below) and we can compare them to benchmarks on a AMD64 linux distribution from someone willing to cooperate on their side (perhaps Mandrake). We could let both sides assist in various performance tweaks (kernel tunings, mysql config settings etc) and you can publish the results if you would like. I would much rather run this Opteron server under FreeBSD if it were as stable and performed as well as the Linux version. The system I have built consists of: Tyan S2880UGNR Dual Opteron Motherboard 2 Opteron 240 CPU's 2 gigs (2 1gig modules) of PC2700 Registered ECC DDR memory LSI Zero Channel Raid Controller (Megaraid 320-0) 4 Fujitsu MAM3184MP U160 Scsi Drives - 15,000rpm 18gb - these will be ran as two 2 drive raid 0 channels, one for MyISAM tables and the other for InnoDB. 1 80 gig ATA133 or SATA drive for system and logging. Let me know if this is something anyone there would be interested in doing. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 2 16:27:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31AD016A4CE for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 16:27:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from omega.metrics.com (internal.metrics.com [204.138.110.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F0643D1D for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 16:27:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tomh@waterloo.equitrac.com) Received: from syncro.metrics.com ([192.168.96.20]) by omega.metrics.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i230SKlO060176; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 19:28:20 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from tomh@waterloo.equitrac.com) Received: by SYNCRO with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 19:25:59 -0500 Message-ID: From: "Haapanen, Tom" To: "'JG'" , freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 19:25:59 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.67, clamav-milter version 0.66n X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Scanned-By: milter-spamc/0.14.238 (omega [192.168.96.200]); pass=YES; Tue, 02 Mar 2004 19:28:21 -0500 X-Spam-Status: NO, hits=0.00 required=5.00 X-Spam-Level: Subject: RE: High volume AMD64 MySQL server -- FreeBSD vs Linux? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 00:27:25 -0000 Have been happily running a FreeBSD-based MySQL server for about three years now, first with 4.x and more recently with 5.x. This is the back end for a fairly busy web site, currently about 5M pages per month, 1.5M+ queries per day. FreeBSD and MySQL have been rock-solid. The only issues started coming in when the traffic overwhelmed the previous CPU and MySQL would need to be restarted once in a while. Currently running dual Opteron 242s with 2 GB, and there has not been a single FreeBSD or MySQL glitch in the 45 or so days that the system has been in production. Tom -----Original Message----- From: JG [mailto:amd64list@jpgsworld.com] Sent: Tuesday 02 March 2004 18:59 To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: High volume AMD64 MySQL server -- FreeBSD vs Linux? Hello AMD64 development team, I am a long time FreeBSD user and my current project requires me to build a stable, high volume MySQL database server. I know someone who is currently running a very high volume Linux based dual opteron MySQL server. I have heard and read bad things about running MySQL on intel based FreeBSD systems -- espeically those before the 5.x branch. I guess it had something to do with how threading is performed on FreeBSD vs on Linux. Does this threading issue still apply with FreeBSD/AMD64? Do you think the FreeBSD/AMD64 project is ready to be used as the OS for a high volume production MySQL server? If the FreeBSD AMD64 team thinks it is worth it, I would like to offer to conduct some assisted benchmark tests on the system I have built (see below) and we can compare them to benchmarks on a AMD64 linux distribution from someone willing to cooperate on their side (perhaps Mandrake). We could let both sides assist in various performance tweaks (kernel tunings, mysql config settings etc) and you can publish the results if you would like. I would much rather run this Opteron server under FreeBSD if it were as stable and performed as well as the Linux version. The system I have built consists of: Tyan S2880UGNR Dual Opteron Motherboard 2 Opteron 240 CPU's 2 gigs (2 1gig modules) of PC2700 Registered ECC DDR memory LSI Zero Channel Raid Controller (Megaraid 320-0) 4 Fujitsu MAM3184MP U160 Scsi Drives - 15,000rpm 18gb - these will be ran as two 2 drive raid 0 channels, one for MyISAM tables and the other for InnoDB. 1 80 gig ATA133 or SATA drive for system and logging. Let me know if this is something anyone there would be interested in doing. _______________________________________________ freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-amd64 To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-amd64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 2 20:51:10 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBA2D16A4CF for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 20:51:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from bigtex.jrv.org (bigtex.jrv.org [208.202.121.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 031F843D1D for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 20:51:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from james@bigtex.jrv.org) Received: from bigtex.jrv.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bigtex.jrv.org (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id i232qFp9040506 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 2 Mar 2004 20:52:15 -0600 (CST) Received: (from james@localhost) by bigtex.jrv.org (8.12.1/8.12.1/Submit) id i232qFlf040503; Tue, 2 Mar 2004 20:52:15 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 20:52:15 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <200403030252.i232qFlf040503@bigtex.jrv.org> From: James Van Artsdalen To: tomh@waterloo.equitrac.com In-reply-to: (tomh@waterloo.equitrac.com) References: cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: High volume AMD64 MySQL server -- FreeBSD vs Linux? X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 04:51:10 -0000 How do SQL servers respond to additional memory? The thing that sets 64-bit FreeBSD apart in my mind is the ability for a process to have a 16+ GB resident working set if desired. See if the SQL guys have performance curves for process sizes. I would not be at all surprised if a single 8 GB Opteron could outperform a pair of Xeon systems, even if the Xeons had faster CPU and disk. If RAM is a powerful influence keep in mind that you can go to 16 GB without doing anything exotic, using ECC RAM at < $500 per GB. PS. I'm aware of Intel systems with > 4 GB RAM. PAE is a hack and not at all the same as having the memory in-process. > From: "Haapanen, Tom" > Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 19:25:59 -0500 > > Currently running dual Opteron 242s with 2 GB, and there has not been a > single FreeBSD or MySQL glitch in the 45 or so days that the system has been > in production. > > -----Original Message----- > From: JG [mailto:amd64list@jpgsworld.com] > Sent: Tuesday 02 March 2004 18:59 > To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org > Subject: High volume AMD64 MySQL server -- FreeBSD vs Linux? > > Tyan S2880UGNR Dual Opteron Motherboard > 2 Opteron 240 CPU's > 2 gigs (2 1gig modules) of PC2700 Registered ECC DDR memory LSI Zero Channel > Raid Controller (Megaraid 320-0) > 4 Fujitsu MAM3184MP U160 Scsi Drives - 15,000rpm 18gb > - these will be ran as two 2 drive raid 0 channels, > one for MyISAM tables and the other for InnoDB. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 3 13:01:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D865016A4CE for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:01:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.ncsa.uiuc.edu (mail.ncsa.uiuc.edu [141.142.2.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9066143D1D for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:01:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from koziol@ncsa.uiuc.edu) X-Envelope-From: koziol@ncsa.uiuc.edu X-Envelope-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu (sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu [141.142.96.70]) by mail.ncsa.uiuc.edu (8.11.7/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i23L1Zq14040; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 15:01:35 -0600 Received: from sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i23L1a5D034842; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 15:01:36 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from koziol@sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu) Received: (from koziol@localhost) by sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i23L1aRx034841; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 15:01:36 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from koziol) From: Quincey Koziol Message-Id: <200403032101.i23L1aRx034841@sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu> In-Reply-To: <20040303200043.30C6D16A4D3@hub.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 15:01:35 -0600 (CST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99f (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: freebsd-amd64 Digest, Vol 39, Issue 3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 21:01:38 -0000 > Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2004 13:13:56 -0800 > From: Kris Kennaway > Subject: Re: Help getting to Current > To: Adriaan de Groot > Cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <20040302211356.GB6755@xor.obsecurity.org> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > > On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 09:52:00PM +0100, Adriaan de Groot wrote: > > On Tuesday 02 March 2004 21:37, Quincey Koziol wrote: > > > I've recently installed FreeBSD 5.1 on a new dual-opteron PC (an MSI > > > K8T Master-FAR2 motherboard). However, I'm having trouble getting current. > > > The pre-built cvsup binary I installed with pkg_add fails with this error: > > > ELF interpreter /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 not found > > You're trying to run a binary built for 5.2 against 5.1. This does > not work, as you have discovered. > > Your best bet is to update to 5.2.1, since amd64 support is much improved. Ok, I managed to copy the source code off of the 5.2.1-RELEASE CD-ROM and (after hacking the makefiles a bit) build a new world & kernel. However, after installing the new kernel (and rebooting in single user, with ACPI disabled), I'm back to the same behavior as when I boot the 5.2.1 CD-ROM itself - the system is _glacially_ slow, taking many, many minutes to make progress in booting and making interactive use (at the console, since network connections always time-out) extremely difficult. Is this a general symptom of amd64 machines that others have seen? Would disabling "INVARIANTS" or "WITNESS" in the GENERIC kernel build help? Or, has this been addressed in 5-CURRENT and I just need the most recent source? Could anyone help me out by providing a .tgz of a recent /usr/src? Thanks, Quincey From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 3 13:52:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAEFA16A4CE for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:52:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from pandora.cs.kun.nl (pandora.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2BD543D2F for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 13:52:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from adridg@cs.kun.nl) Received: from odin.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.33] (helo=localhost) by pandora.cs.kun.nl (8.12.10/3.66) with ESMTP id i23LqCb9026502; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:52:13 +0100 (MET) From: Adriaan de Groot To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 22:52:07 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.51 References: <200403032101.i23L1aRx034841@sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu> In-Reply-To: <200403032101.i23L1aRx034841@sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200403032252.12666.adridg@cs.kun.nl> cc: Quincey Koziol Subject: Re: freebsd-amd64 Digest, Vol 39, Issue 3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 21:52:15 -0000 =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 03 March 2004 22:01, Quincey Koziol wrote: > with ACPI disabled), I'm back to the same behavior as when I boot the 5.2= =2E1 > CD-ROM itself - the system is _glacially_ slow, taking many, many minutes > to make progress in booting and making interactive use (at the console, > since network connections always time-out) extremely difficult. Remember, glaciers are retreating at record speed, so glacial is a relative= =20 term :) > Is this a general symptom of amd64 machines that others have seen?=20 > Would disabling "INVARIANTS" or "WITNESS" in the GENERIC kernel build hel= p? I've got -CURRENT GENERIC here, with=20 options DDB # Enable the kernel debugger options INVARIANTS # Enable calls of extra sanity=20 checking options INVARIANT_SUPPORT # Extra sanity checks of internal=20 struc tures, required by INVARIANTS options WITNESS # Enable checks to detect deadlocks= =20 and cycles options WITNESS_SKIPSPIN # Don't run witness on spinlocks fo= r=20 sp in addition, my make.conf sets -g for everything, so the whole system is bu= ilt=20 with debugging all the time. It runs smoothly. =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFARlOMdqzuAf6io/4RArCkAJ9ZOtZSBwdKzlNEp33vA4H3XPxbtwCgkISa nj1eG5m3N/ZCkzDRHrwvHjQ=3D =3DGXnc =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 3 14:04:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C33216A4CE for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 14:04:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.ncsa.uiuc.edu (mail.ncsa.uiuc.edu [141.142.2.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C87A43D3F for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 14:04:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from koziol@ncsa.uiuc.edu) X-Envelope-From: koziol@ncsa.uiuc.edu X-Envelope-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu (sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu [141.142.96.70]) by mail.ncsa.uiuc.edu (8.11.7/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i23M1Gq09304; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 16:01:16 -0600 Received: from sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i23M1H5D035159; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 16:01:17 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from koziol@sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu) Received: (from koziol@localhost) by sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i23M1CgE035158; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 16:01:12 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from koziol) From: Quincey Koziol Message-Id: <200403032201.i23M1CgE035158@sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu> In-Reply-To: <200403032252.12666.adridg@cs.kun.nl> To: Adriaan de Groot Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 16:01:12 -0600 (CST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99f (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-amd64 Digest, Vol 39, Issue 3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 22:04:56 -0000 [ PGP not available, raw data follows ] > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wednesday 03 March 2004 22:01, Quincey Koziol wrote: > > with ACPI disabled), I'm back to the same behavior as when I boot the 5.2.1 > > CD-ROM itself - the system is _glacially_ slow, taking many, many minutes > > to make progress in booting and making interactive use (at the console, > > since network connections always time-out) extremely difficult. > > Remember, glaciers are retreating at record speed, so glacial is a relative > term :) :-) > > Is this a general symptom of amd64 machines that others have seen? > > Would disabling "INVARIANTS" or "WITNESS" in the GENERIC kernel build help? > > I've got -CURRENT GENERIC here, with > > options DDB # Enable the kernel debugger > options INVARIANTS # Enable calls of extra sanity > checking > options INVARIANT_SUPPORT # Extra sanity checks of internal > struc > tures, required by INVARIANTS > options WITNESS # Enable checks to detect deadlocks > and > cycles > options WITNESS_SKIPSPIN # Don't run witness on spinlocks for > sp > > in addition, my make.conf sets -g for everything, so the whole system is built > with debugging all the time. It runs smoothly. Hmm, what motherboard are you using? I've got an MSI K8T Master-FAR2 in this system. Is anyone out there successfully using this motherboard with FreeBSD 5-CURRENT? I'm rebuilding with a stripped-down GENERIC config that eliminates lots of unnecessary hardware controllers, possibly that will fix it... Thanks, Quincey From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 3 14:21:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C111716A4CE for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 14:21:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from pandora.cs.kun.nl (pandora.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4839D43D41 for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 14:21:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from adridg@cs.kun.nl) Received: from odin.cs.kun.nl [131.174.33.33] (helo=localhost) by pandora.cs.kun.nl (8.12.10/3.66) with ESMTP id i23MLsb9001070; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 23:21:54 +0100 (MET) From: Adriaan de Groot To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 23:21:47 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.51 References: <200403032201.i23M1CgE035158@sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu> In-Reply-To: <200403032201.i23M1CgE035158@sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200403032321.53782.adridg@cs.kun.nl> cc: Quincey Koziol Subject: Re: freebsd-amd64 Digest, Vol 39, Issue 3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 22:21:55 -0000 =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 03 March 2004 23:01, Quincey Koziol wrote: > > in addition, my make.conf sets -g for everything, so the whole system is > > built with debugging all the time. It runs smoothly. > > Hmm, what motherboard are you using? I've got an MSI K8T Master-FAR2 > in this system. Is anyone out there successfully using this motherboard > with FreeBSD 5-CURRENT? Asus K8V deluxe, amd64 3200+, 1G RAM. Nothing weird going on at all. I star= ted=20 with a snapshot releease from november, got the cvsup-no-gui, updated, and= =20 have been tracking current since. I've never actually installed any of the= =20 =2D -RELEASEs that support amd64. =2D --=20 pub 1024D/FEA2A3FE 2002-06-18 Adriaan de Groot Would you like a freem? =2D----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFARlqBdqzuAf6io/4RAl+vAJ90YWvgAJ7k89GZP0yanRLLfOreogCffNI4 ZN849ROo/fwHI9cYxsJqKQM=3D =3DxhWO =2D----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 3 14:25:33 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBCDC16A4CE for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 14:25:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.ncsa.uiuc.edu (mail.ncsa.uiuc.edu [141.142.2.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D7F43D1D for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 14:25:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from koziol@ncsa.uiuc.edu) X-Envelope-From: koziol@ncsa.uiuc.edu X-Envelope-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu (sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu [141.142.96.70]) by mail.ncsa.uiuc.edu (8.11.7/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i23MPUq31762; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 16:25:30 -0600 Received: from sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i23MPV5D035305; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 16:25:31 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from koziol@sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu) Received: (from koziol@localhost) by sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i23MPV7m035304; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 16:25:31 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from koziol) From: Quincey Koziol Message-Id: <200403032225.i23MPV7m035304@sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu> In-Reply-To: <200403032321.53782.adridg@cs.kun.nl> To: Adriaan de Groot Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 16:25:31 -0600 (CST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99f (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-amd64 Digest, Vol 39, Issue 3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Mar 2004 22:25:34 -0000 [ PGP not available, raw data follows ] > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wednesday 03 March 2004 23:01, Quincey Koziol wrote: > > > in addition, my make.conf sets -g for everything, so the whole system is > > > built with debugging all the time. It runs smoothly. > > > > Hmm, what motherboard are you using? I've got an MSI K8T Master-FAR2 > > in this system. Is anyone out there successfully using this motherboard > > with FreeBSD 5-CURRENT? > > Asus K8V deluxe, amd64 3200+, 1G RAM. Nothing weird going on at all. I started > with a snapshot releease from november, got the cvsup-no-gui, updated, and > have been tracking current since. I've never actually installed any of the > - -RELEASEs that support amd64. Hmm, that's a single-CPU board, correct? Mine is a dual-CPU board with two opteron 240's installed. I wonder if that's the problem... I may try to build with a non-SMP kernel if this latest build still has the weird "slowness" problem. Thanks, Quincey From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Mar 3 20:11:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BD1816A4CE for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 20:11:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A97C743D2F for ; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 20:10:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i244AuOJ035040; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 20:10:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i244AuP8035039; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 20:10:56 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 20:10:56 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Quincey Koziol Message-ID: <20040304041056.GA34790@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <200403032321.53782.adridg@cs.kun.nl> <200403032225.i23MPV7m035304@sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200403032225.i23MPV7m035304@sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-amd64 Digest, Vol 39, Issue 3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 04:11:00 -0000 On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 04:25:31PM -0600, Quincey Koziol wrote: > [ PGP not available, raw data follows ] > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Wednesday 03 March 2004 23:01, Quincey Koziol wrote: > > > > in addition, my make.conf sets -g for everything, so the whole system is > > > > built with debugging all the time. It runs smoothly. > > > > > > Hmm, what motherboard are you using? I've got an MSI K8T Master-FAR2 > > > in this system. Is anyone out there successfully using this motherboard > > > with FreeBSD 5-CURRENT? > > > > Asus K8V deluxe, amd64 3200+, 1G RAM. Nothing weird going on at all. I started > > with a snapshot releease from november, got the cvsup-no-gui, updated, and > > have been tracking current since. I've never actually installed any of the > > - -RELEASEs that support amd64. > Hmm, that's a single-CPU board, correct? Mine is a dual-CPU board with > two opteron 240's installed. I wonder if that's the problem... I may try to > build with a non-SMP kernel if this latest build still has the weird "slowness" > problem. You've got some very bad problems. First off, you shouldn't need to hack the 5.2.1 source at all to build. Second, I also have an MSI dual-processor Opteron (MSI-9131 K8D Master-F) system -- it is the one that built the 5.2.1 release. I also have an Iwill DK8X dual-processor board. Neither are _glacially_ slow. The first thing to do is check that you have the latest BIOS. Second is to tell the CPU and RAM (DDR what and CL what). Next is post the output of "boot -v". -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 4 00:36:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42B3116A4CE for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:36:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from bigtex.jrv.org (mail.jrv.org [208.202.121.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC35543D39 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 00:36:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from james@bigtex.jrv.org) Received: from bigtex.jrv.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bigtex.jrv.org (8.12.1/8.12.1) with ESMTP id i240khp9001983 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Wed, 3 Mar 2004 18:46:58 -0600 (CST) Received: (from james@localhost) by bigtex.jrv.org (8.12.1/8.12.1/Submit) id i240kgLn001980; Wed, 3 Mar 2004 18:46:42 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 18:46:42 -0600 (CST) Message-Id: <200403040046.i240kgLn001980@bigtex.jrv.org> From: James Van Artsdalen To: koziol@ncsa.uiuc.edu In-reply-to: <200403032101.i23L1aRx034841@sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu> (message from Quincey Koziol on Wed, 3 Mar 2004 15:01:35 -0600 (CST)) References: <200403032101.i23L1aRx034841@sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu> cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-amd64 Digest, Vol 39, Issue 3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 08:36:49 -0000 > From: Quincey Koziol > Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 15:01:35 -0600 (CST) > > Ok, I managed to copy the source code off of the 5.2.1-RELEASE CD-ROM and > (after hacking the makefiles a bit) build a new world & kernel. However, after > installing the new kernel (and rebooting in single user, with ACPI disabled), > I'm back to the same behavior as when I boot the 5.2.1 CD-ROM itself - the > system is _glacially_ slow, taking many, many minutes to make progress in > booting and making interactive use (at the console, since network connections > always time-out) extremely difficult. This is not normal. Does the i386 CD do this too? Can you disable ACPI in the system ROM setup? > Is this a general symptom of amd64 machines that others have seen? Would > disabling "INVARIANTS" or "WITNESS" in the GENERIC kernel build help? Or, has > this been addressed in 5-CURRENT and I just need the most recent source? > Could anyone help me out by providing a .tgz of a recent /usr/src? Does your GENERIC enable WITNESS? I don't think it ships that way. From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 4 09:51:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D0716A4CE for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:51:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from ares.wolfpond.org (ns1.wolfpond.org [62.212.96.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C855A43D2D for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 09:51:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from ftigeot@wolfpond.org) Received: from ares.wolfpond.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ares.wolfpond.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i24Hp4xC036474; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 18:51:04 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from greywolf@ares.wolfpond.org) Received: (from greywolf@localhost) by ares.wolfpond.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i24Hp4jU036473; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 18:51:04 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from greywolf) Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 18:51:03 +0100 From: Francois Tigeot To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040304175103.GA36195@ares.wolfpond.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: Cross-compilation to i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 17:51:22 -0000 Greetings, I'm currently running a 5.2.1-RELEASE/amd64 system and I'm trying to cross-build an i386 world with the following command : time nice make buildworld TARGET_ARCH=i386 DESTDIR=/itx This fails miserably with these error messages : cc -Os -march=c3 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -I/usr/src/sbin/gbde/../../sys -DRESCUE -Wsystem -headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpointer -arith -Wreturn-type -Wcast-qual -Wwrite-strings -Wswitch -Wshadow -Wcast-align -c /usr/src/sys/crypto/sha2/sha2.c {standard input}: Assembler messages: {standard input}:92: Error: bignum invalid {standard input}:93: Error: bignum invalid [more bignum invalid lines] {standard input}:191: Error: bignum invalid *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sbin/gbde. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/obj/i386/usr/src/rescue/rescue. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/rescue/rescue. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/rescue. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Since, I didn't find any previous messages on this subject in the archives, I don't even know if this is supposed to work. If someone could point me to some documentation on cross-compilation or buildworld magic, I could try to dig further... -- Francois Tigeot From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 4 12:50:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F57416A4CE for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 12:50:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.ncsa.uiuc.edu (mail.ncsa.uiuc.edu [141.142.2.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB80C43D1F for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 12:50:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from koziol@ncsa.uiuc.edu) X-Envelope-From: koziol@ncsa.uiuc.edu X-Envelope-To: Received: from sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu (sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu [141.142.96.70]) by mail.ncsa.uiuc.edu (8.11.7/8.11.7) with ESMTP id i24KoLO08070 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:50:21 -0600 Received: from sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i24KoM5D021233 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:50:22 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from koziol@sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu) Received: (from koziol@localhost) by sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i24KoMa9021232 for freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:50:22 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from koziol) From: Quincey Koziol Message-Id: <200403042050.i24KoMa9021232@sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu> In-Reply-To: <20040304041056.GA34790@dragon.nuxi.com> To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:50:22 -0600 (CST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99f (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Subject: Re: freebsd-amd64 Digest, Vol 39, Issue 3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 20:50:24 -0000 > On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 04:25:31PM -0600, Quincey Koziol wrote: > > [ PGP not available, raw data follows ] > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > On Wednesday 03 March 2004 23:01, Quincey Koziol wrote: > > > > > in addition, my make.conf sets -g for everything, so the whole system is > > > > > built with debugging all the time. It runs smoothly. > > > > > > > > Hmm, what motherboard are you using? I've got an MSI K8T Master-FAR2 > > > > in this system. Is anyone out there successfully using this motherboard > > > > with FreeBSD 5-CURRENT? > > > > > > Asus K8V deluxe, amd64 3200+, 1G RAM. Nothing weird going on at all. I started > > > with a snapshot releease from november, got the cvsup-no-gui, updated, and > > > have been tracking current since. I've never actually installed any of the > > > - -RELEASEs that support amd64. > > Hmm, that's a single-CPU board, correct? Mine is a dual-CPU board with > > two opteron 240's installed. I wonder if that's the problem... I may try to > > build with a non-SMP kernel if this latest build still has the weird "slowness" > > problem. > > You've got some very bad problems. Tell me about it! :-( > First off, you shouldn't need to hack the 5.2.1 source at all to build. > Second, I also have an MSI dual-processor Opteron (MSI-9131 K8D Master-F) > system -- it is the one that built the 5.2.1 release. I also have an > Iwill DK8X dual-processor board. Neither are _glacially_ slow. Hmm, I may just send this machine back and switch to "known good" hardware. Which dual-Opteron motherboard would you recommend? One of the two you have or another one? > The first thing to do is check that you have the latest BIOS. Second is > to tell the CPU and RAM (DDR what and CL what). Next is post the output > of "boot -v". Well, I did upgrade to the latest BIOS (from 1.0 to 1.1), but that didn't help at all. I have two Opteron 240's in the machine with two DDR2100 RAM modules set to "auto" in the BIOS (but I tried the CAS 2 and CAS 2.5 manual settings also, both of which didn't help). I went ahead and re-installed 5.1-RELEASE, grabbed the 5.2-CURRENT source code from this morning and re-built everything. This time, everything built very smoothly (no hacking the Makefiles, etc.), but it now hangs before giving me the problem for a shell (when booting in single-user mode, since I was trying to finish the re-install procedure), so I can't get the output from "boot -v". I've tried changing the "MPS Version Control for OS" from 1.4 to 1.1 (as I saw someone else had success with), but that didn't help either. Any further suggestions? Do I have defective hardware? Thanks, Quincey From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 4 12:53:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C58BA16A4CE for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 12:53:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.ncsa.uiuc.edu (mail.ncsa.uiuc.edu [141.142.2.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B37543D39 for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 12:53:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from koziol@ncsa.uiuc.edu) X-Envelope-From: koziol@ncsa.uiuc.edu X-Envelope-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu (sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu [141.142.96.70]) by mail.ncsa.uiuc.edu (8.11.7/8.11.7) with ESMTP id i24Kr1O11485; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:53:01 -0600 Received: from sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i24Kr25D021253; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:53:02 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from koziol@sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu) Received: (from koziol@localhost) by sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i24Kr2ne021252; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:53:02 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from koziol) From: Quincey Koziol Message-Id: <200403042053.i24Kr2ne021252@sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu> In-Reply-To: <200403040046.i240kgLn001980@bigtex.jrv.org> To: James Van Artsdalen Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 14:53:02 -0600 (CST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL99f (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-amd64 Digest, Vol 39, Issue 3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Mar 2004 20:53:04 -0000 > > From: Quincey Koziol > > Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 15:01:35 -0600 (CST) > > > > Ok, I managed to copy the source code off of the 5.2.1-RELEASE CD-ROM and > > (after hacking the makefiles a bit) build a new world & kernel. However, after > > installing the new kernel (and rebooting in single user, with ACPI disabled), > > I'm back to the same behavior as when I boot the 5.2.1 CD-ROM itself - the > > system is _glacially_ slow, taking many, many minutes to make progress in > > booting and making interactive use (at the console, since network connections > > always time-out) extremely difficult. > > This is not normal. Does the i386 CD do this too? Can you disable ACPI in the > system ROM setup? Hmm, I hadn't thought about the i386 CD, I'll see about trying that. I can't disable ACPI in the BIOS setup, unfortunately... > > Is this a general symptom of amd64 machines that others have seen? Would > > disabling "INVARIANTS" or "WITNESS" in the GENERIC kernel build help? Or, has > > this been addressed in 5-CURRENT and I just need the most recent source? > > Could anyone help me out by providing a .tgz of a recent /usr/src? > > Does your GENERIC enable WITNESS? I don't think it ships that way. When I re-built the kernel, it had WITNESS enabled, but I've since re-built without INVARIANT and WITNESS and that didn't help either. :-( Quincey From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 4 20:20:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6574C16A4CE for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 20:20:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DCFB43D2F for ; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 20:20:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.com) Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i254K1OJ057567; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 20:20:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i254K1Q2057566; Thu, 4 Mar 2004 20:20:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2004 20:20:01 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" To: Quincey Koziol Message-ID: <20040305042001.GB34790@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <20040304041056.GA34790@dragon.nuxi.com> <200403042050.i24KoMa9021232@sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200403042050.i24KoMa9021232@sleipnir.ncsa.uiuc.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT Organization: The NUXI BSD Group X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3 90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5 cc: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-amd64 Digest, Vol 39, Issue 3 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 04:20:02 -0000 On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 02:50:22PM -0600, Quincey Koziol wrote: > > First off, you shouldn't need to hack the 5.2.1 source at all to build. > > Second, I also have an MSI dual-processor Opteron (MSI-9131 K8D Master-F) > > system -- it is the one that built the 5.2.1 release. I also have an > > Iwill DK8X dual-processor board. Neither are _glacially_ slow. > Hmm, I may just send this machine back and switch to "known good" hardware. > Which dual-Opteron motherboard would you recommend? One of the two you have > or another one? I have direct good experience with: + MSI MSI-9131 K8D Master-F, + Iwill DK8X + Tyan Thunder K8W (s2885) + Tyan Thunder K8S Pro (4+4 DIMM config) + Arima HDAMA(sp?) server board > I saw someone else had success with), but that didn't help either. > Any further suggestions? Do I have defective hardware? It is possible you do have a HW issue -- maybe the RAM isn't certified for your motherboard, maybe something else. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Mar 5 05:10:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E75416A4CE for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 05:10:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail.uk.psi.com (mail.uk.psi.com [154.8.2.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F5E443D2D for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2004 05:10:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from alan.barrow@psineteurope.com) Received: from camdev-01.ops.uk.psi.com ([154.8.22.17]) by mail.uk.psi.com with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1) id 1AzF5n-00049i-00; Fri, 05 Mar 2004 13:10:19 +0000 From: alan barrow To: "freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 (1.0.8-9.7x.1) Date: 05 Mar 2004 13:10:18 +0000 Message-Id: <1078492218.9948.42.camel@ip5.ops.uk.psi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 cc: techsupport@tyan.com Subject: Tyan S2882UG3NR X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 13:10:23 -0000 Quick run down of this mornings efforts to get FreeBSD 5.2 on the Thunder K8S Pro. Moan groan... just one problem.... The on board adaptec SCSI.. The attempted install of FreeBSD 5.2.. This model:- http://www.tyan.com/products/html/tx28b2880.html Thunder K8S Pro -- S2882UG3NR [ BIOS Ver. 101 ] 2 x 246 2GB DDR ECC 4 x 36GB 10Krpm SCSI HDDs CD-ROM -- TEAC -- (moved from primary master to secondary slave) floppy #################################################################### BIOS -- set to optimal or default. 1) No access to adaptec card BIOS or LSI BIOS using these key strokes throws the machine straight into boot. 2) Using the PCI-X Riser card slot 1 with megaraid 320-1 causes IRQ steering errors to be reported by the BIOS on boot. 3) Using the PCI-X Riser card slot 2 with megaraid 320-1 removes the errors but the issue is the same as 1). #################################################################### Tests :-- 1) BIOS -- set to default .. the following turned off. * IDE off * floppy off * ACPI off * Device and PCI Slots (All DMA off) * USB Host controllers Diasabled * Onboard SATA disabled (why have this at all???) * Onboard AIC-7902W SCSI Disabled * Onboard ZCR N/A * Onboard GB lan Disabled * Onboard GB lan Rom Disabled * Serial Port 1 / 2 / parallel off * Onboard floppy controller disabled * Remote Access Disabled * Plug & Play OS No Result :- No access to the MegaRAID BIOS. (Notice the SCSI has been disabled here) ####################################################### 2) BIOS -- set to default .. the following turned off. * IDE off * floppy off * ACPI off * Device and PCI Slots (All DMA off) * USB Host controllers Diasabled * Onboard SATA disabled * Onboard GB lan Disabled * Onboard GB lan Rom Disabled * Serial Port 1 / 2 / parallel off * Onboard floppy controller disabled * Remote Access Disab Result :- No access to the MegaRAID or adaptec BIOSs. (Notice the SCSI has been disabled here) ####################################################### 3) BIOS -- set to default .. the following turned off. * IDE off * floppy off * ACPI off * Device and PCI Slots (All DMA off) * USB Host controllers Diasabled * Onboard SATA disabled * Onboard GB lan Disabled * Onboard GB lan Rom Disabled * Serial Port 1 / 2 / parallel off * Onboard floppy controller disabled * Remote Access Disab Remove the Megaraid card from the system entirely. Internal SCSI becomes a boot from device option. ###################################################### Right so with the megaraid out option 3) BIOS set and the SCSI devices hanging off the internal SCSI, The following is the DMESG. Copyright (c) 1992-2004 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.2-RELEASE #0: Sun Jan 11 04:21:45 GMT 2004 root@wv1u.btc.adaptec.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC Preloaded elf kernel "/boot/kernel/kernel" at 0xc09e1000. MPTable: