From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 12 08:24:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACEF816A4CE for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 08:24:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from nmgww.sn.tsden.org (gw.nemossan.jp [202.216.232.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CF4B43D53 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 08:24:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from "") Received: from nmgww.sn.tsden.org (IDENT:ryutaroh@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nmgww.sn.tsden.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3CFOSw2009018 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 00:24:28 +0900 Received: (from ryutaroh@localhost) by nmgww.sn.tsden.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i3CFOSHH009017 for emulation@freebsd.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 00:24:28 +0900 Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 00:24:28 +0900 Message-Id: <200404121524.i3CFOSHH009017@nmgww.sn.tsden.org> X-Authentication-Warning: nmgww.sn.tsden.org: ryutaroh set sender to <> using -f To: emulation@freebsd.org Auto-Submitted: auto-replied From: ryutaroh@tsden.org Precedence: junk Subject: X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 15:24:30 -0000 I do not read the email account "ryutaroh@tsden.org". Thank you. From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 12 11:01:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9084716A4D0 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 11:01:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ADD643D46 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 11:01:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (peter@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3CI1Pbv084308 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 11:01:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i3CI1Ovi084302 for emulation@freebsd.org; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 11:01:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 11:01:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200404121801.i3CI1Ovi084302@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: peter set sender to owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Current problem reports assigned to you X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 18:01:25 -0000 Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2003/06/28] kern/53874 emulation /usr/ports/emulators/linux_base isn't wor 1 problem total. Serious problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2000/09/21] kern/21463 emulation Linux compatability mode should not allow o [2000/11/13] kern/22826 emulation Memory limits have no effect in linux com o [2000/12/14] misc/23561 emulation Linux compatibility mode does not support o [2001/03/28] kern/26171 emulation not work Linux-emulator, but hi is work i 4 problems total. Non-critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2000/06/19] misc/19391 emulation Evilness with Linux Terminus, causes X to o [2002/08/11] kern/41543 emulation Easier wine/w23 support p [2002/09/04] kern/42404 emulation TIOCSCTTY not implemented in linuxulator o [2002/11/26] kern/45785 emulation Linux WineX seems to require a few new li 4 problems total. From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 13 07:29:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E575316A4CE for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 07:29:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chuggalug.clues.com (chuggalug.demon.co.uk [62.49.17.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF2543D1F for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 07:29:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from geoffb@chuggalug.clues.com) Received: from chuggalug.clues.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chuggalug.clues.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3DENn3N038799 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 14:23:49 GMT (envelope-from geoffb@chuggalug.clues.com) Received: (from geoffb@localhost) by chuggalug.clues.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i3DENmaX038798 for emulation@freebsd.org; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 14:23:48 GMT (envelope-from geoffb) Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 14:23:48 +0000 From: Geoff Buckingham To: emulation@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040413142348.GB31567@chuggalug.clues.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Subject: LSB runtime compliance? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 14:29:19 -0000 Would it be reasonable and desirable to have compat linux envronment that conforms to the requiremnts of the Linux Standards Base runtime environment? The benefit of this realy depends on software vendors releaseing for LSB runtimes. Certification is not cheap, but not prohibitavley expensive, at this point I am wondering if their are any known technical obsticles? http://www.opengroup.org/lsb/cert/docs/LSB_Certification_Guide.html I had a quick look at this and the first obsticle is that you really need to have an RPM suite installed within your compat linux environment. After that problems were mainley around paths. Is it possible to force linux binaries to only look for files under /compat/linux ? From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 13 08:03:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 328F116A4CF for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 08:03:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pr93.lublin.sdi.tpnet.pl (pr93.lublin.sdi.tpnet.pl [217.97.36.93]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3BAB443D3F for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 08:03:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from michal@pasternak.w.lub.pl) Received: (qmail 96586 invoked by uid 1001); 13 Apr 2004 14:56:58 -0000 Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 16:56:58 +0200 From: Michal Pasternak To: Geoff Buckingham Message-ID: <20040413145658.GB96467@pasternak.w.lub.pl> References: <20040413142348.GB31567@chuggalug.clues.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040413142348.GB31567@chuggalug.clues.com> cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LSB runtime compliance? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Michal Pasternak List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 15:03:26 -0000 Geoff Buckingham [Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 02:23:48PM +0000]: > After that problems were mainley around paths. Is it possible to force linux > binaries to only look for files under /compat/linux ? chroot / jail ? From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 14 01:36:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DAF116A4CE for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 01:36:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from chuggalug.clues.com (chuggalug.demon.co.uk [62.49.17.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D511B43D48 for ; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 01:36:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from geoffb@chuggalug.clues.com) Received: from chuggalug.clues.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chuggalug.clues.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i3E8Uh3N057566; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 08:30:43 GMT (envelope-from geoffb@chuggalug.clues.com) Received: (from geoffb@localhost) by chuggalug.clues.com (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i3E8UgaE057565; Wed, 14 Apr 2004 08:30:42 GMT (envelope-from geoffb) Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 08:30:42 +0000 From: Geoff Buckingham To: Michal Pasternak Message-ID: <20040414083042.GA57420@chuggalug.clues.com> References: <20040413142348.GB31567@chuggalug.clues.com> <20040413145658.GB96467@pasternak.w.lub.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040413145658.GB96467@pasternak.w.lub.pl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LSB runtime compliance? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2004 08:36:13 -0000 On Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 04:56:58PM +0200, Michal Pasternak wrote: > Geoff Buckingham [Tue, Apr 13, 2004 at 02:23:48PM +0000]: > > After that problems were mainley around paths. Is it possible to force linux > > binaries to only look for files under /compat/linux ? > > chroot / jail ? possibley but having looked through the lsb runtime requirements, I thought it desirable to use native FreeBSD e2fsprogs binaries, maybe linux binaries could be used. Does /compat/linux/dev self populate under current and devfs? Not sure if their would be other cases where native binaries would be prefered?