From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 19 03:40:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 845AC16A4D0 for ; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 03:40:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from auk2.snu.ac.kr (auk2.snu.ac.kr [147.46.100.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08D5043D1F for ; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 03:40:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spamrefuse@yahoo.com) Received: from [147.46.44.181] (spamrefuse@yahoo.com) by auk2.snu.ac.kr (Terrace Internet Messaging Server) with ESMTP id 2004091912:39:54:482599.29654.2088655792 for ; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 12:39:54 +0900 (KST) Message-ID: <414CFF94.30409@yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 12:40:04 +0900 From: Rob User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040901 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TERRACE-SPAMMARK: NO (SR:2.15) (by Terrace) Subject: 5.3-BETA4 : video card not in dmesg output !?! X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 03:40:06 -0000 Hello, I have couple of 4-Stable PC's and two 5.3-'cvsupped'. One of the 5.3 gives my some trouble with the video card, but what I find strange is that the card is not listed in the dmesg output. All I see is: pci0: at device 7.3 (no driver attached) pci0: at device 16.0 (no driver attached) However, 'pciconf -lv' tells me: none1@pci1:0:0: class=0x030000 card=0xff00102b chip=0x1001102b rev=0x02 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Matrox Electronic Systems Ltd.' device = 'MGA-G100 Twister AGP' class = display subclass = VGA Is something wrong with my configuration or is this just a new 'feature' of the 5.X kernel? Rob. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 19 07:39:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 553DE16A4CE for ; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 07:39:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cs1.cs.huji.ac.il (cs1.cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E65D43D1D for ; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 07:39:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32]) by cs1.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 1C8wIP-000Pzu-QQ for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 10:39:41 +0300 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.0 06/18/2004 with nmh-1.0.4 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-reply-to: Your message of Sat, 18 Sep 2004 14:23:22 -0400 . Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 10:39:42 +0300 From: Danny Braniss Message-Id: <20040919073943.0E65D43D1D@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: supporting broadcom gig BCM5751 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 07:39:43 -0000 is this a gx280? danny > John Kennedy probably said: > > Still, not your exact chipset (presumably 0x14e4 is vendor and 0x1677 is > > version, the chip= field has them swapped, > > You're correct. > > > and my two machines straddle your chip. > > I have another 5.3-BETA4 box with a BCM5788 (chip=0x169c14e4) but that > > isn't the right chip either, and it isn't a Dell. > > Yes, there is support for devices either side of the version ID I'm > having probles with. > > Unfortunately it's not supported under HEAD or 5.x; > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/sys/dev/bge/ > > which is why I was asking for help with how to add support. > > P. > > -- > pir > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 19 18:37:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B418F16A4CE for ; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 18:37:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from moek.pir.net (moek.pir.net [130.64.1.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42AB143D2D for ; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 18:37:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pir@pir.net) Received: from pir by moek.pir.net with local (Exim) id 1C96Z1-000196-Hd for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 14:37:31 -0400 Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 14:37:31 -0400 From: Peter Radcliffe To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040919183731.GA2758@pir.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20040919073943.0E65D43D1D@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040919073943.0E65D43D1D@mx1.FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-fish: < X-Copy-On-Listmail: Please do NOT Cc: me on list mail. Subject: Re: supporting broadcom gig BCM5751 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 18:37:32 -0000 Danny Braniss probably said: > is this a gx280? No, it's a 8300 desktop box. The gig ether is on the motherboard. I managed to find an intel 10/100 card that would work and would PXE boot for the meantime. P. -- pir From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 20 00:56:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A0D016A4CE for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 00:56:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from auk2.snu.ac.kr (auk2.snu.ac.kr [147.46.100.32]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB74C43D1D for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 00:56:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from spamrefuse@yahoo.com) Received: from [147.46.44.181] (spamrefuse@yahoo.com) by auk2.snu.ac.kr (Terrace Internet Messaging Server) with ESMTP id 2004092009:55:58:540552.29654.2065972144 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 09:55:58 +0900 (KST) Message-ID: <414E2AA5.3060100@yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 09:56:06 +0900 From: Rob User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040920 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TERRACE-SPAMMARK: YES-__TRSYS_LV__3 (SR:-2.10) (SRN:SPAMROBOT) ----------------- Subject: library clash: system vs. ports. What to do? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 00:56:13 -0000 Hello, This is on 4-Stable. When I run "portsclean -L", I get: ** /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.3 is shadowed by /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.3 /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.3 <- ? /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.3 <- openssl-0.9.7d_1 --> This may be an undesirable situation Leave /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.3 (specify -i to ask on this) ** /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.3 is shadowed by /usr/lib/libssl.so.3 /usr/lib/libssl.so.3 <- ? /usr/local/lib/libssl.so.3 <- openssl-0.9.7d_1 --> This may be an undesirable situation Leave /usr/lib/libssl.so.3 (specify -i to ask on this) ** /usr/local/lib/libgssapi.so.5 is shadowed by /usr/lib/libgssapi.so.5 /usr/lib/libgssapi.so.5 <- ? /usr/local/lib/libgssapi.so.5 <- heimdal-0.6.1 --> This may be an undesirable situation Leave /usr/lib/libgssapi.so.5 (specify -i to ask on this) The libraries are different (at least different size), despite equal names. Is this indeed an undesirable situation ? If so, what am I supposed to do in this case? Will I break the system when removing the one in /usr/lib ? Will I break the port when removing the one in usr/local/lib ? So far I have left all in place, without encountering any problems yet. Rob. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 20 01:14:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB73616A4CE for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 01:14:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bache.ece.cmu.edu (BACHE.ECE.CMU.EDU [128.2.129.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B86D443D39 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 01:14:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from allbery@ece.cmu.edu) Received: from [10.9.204.1] (dsl093-061-215.pit1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.61.215]) by bache.ece.cmu.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2C1E82 for ; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 21:14:41 -0400 (EDT) From: "Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <414E2AA5.3060100@yahoo.com> References: <414E2AA5.3060100@yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1095642880.24031.20.camel@rushlight.kf8nh.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 21:14:41 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: library clash: system vs. ports. What to do? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 01:14:43 -0000 On Sun, 2004-09-19 at 20:56, Rob wrote: > ** /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.3 is shadowed by /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.3 > /usr/lib/libcrypto.so.3 <- ? > /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.3 <- openssl-0.9.7d_1 You got that because you installed/upgraded ports depending on the openssl libraries during the period when the base system's openssl libraries were an older insecure version so the ports system installed the one from ports instead. You can just stay with ports and not have problems unless you use mpd, which as of my last cvsup set a BROKEN="doesn't build against ports openssl" if you had ports openssl installed. I ended up extracting a list of dependent ports with "pkg_info -r openssl\*", "pkg_deinstall -f openssl", then "portupgrade -f" the ports listed by the first command. (However I'm still seeing this with libreadline; haven't yet gone in to see what screwy dependency brought it in or whether I can go back to the system one, or if maybe someone thinks this kind of thing is a *good* idea for some reason. Feh.) -- brandon s. allbery [linux,solaris,freebsd,perl] allbery@kf8nh.com system administrator [WAY too many hats] allbery@ece.cmu.edu electrical and computer engineering, carnegie mellon univ. KF8NH From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 20 03:39:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5BB016A4CE for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 03:39:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.ambrisko.com (adsl-64-174-51-43.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [64.174.51.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1FB543D54 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 03:39:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ambrisko@ambrisko.com) Received: from server2.ambrisko.com (HELO www.ambrisko.com) (192.168.1.2) by mail.ambrisko.com with ESMTP; 19 Sep 2004 20:39:26 -0700 Received: from ambrisko.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by www.ambrisko.com (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i8K3dQkT021175; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 20:39:26 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ambrisko@ambrisko.com) Received: (from ambrisko@localhost) by ambrisko.com (8.12.9p2/8.12.9/Submit) id i8K3dPrG021174; Sun, 19 Sep 2004 20:39:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ambrisko) From: Doug Ambrisko Message-Id: <200409200339.i8K3dPrG021174@ambrisko.com> In-Reply-To: <037e01c49c0c$5f1d1aa0$38ff89c3@ashway> To: Andrey Sharandakov Date: Sun, 19 Sep 2004 20:39:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL94b (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Promise PDC20378 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 03:39:26 -0000 Andrey Sharandakov writes: | Does FreeBSD 4.10 support Promise PDC20378 | based RAID controller? Try the patches at: http://www.ambrisko.com/doug/ata/ they are relative to 4.10. Doug A. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 20 13:03:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DAF116A4CE for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 13:03:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pcwin002.win.tue.nl (pcwin002.win.tue.nl [131.155.71.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA35843D62 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 13:03:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stijn@pcwin002.win.tue.nl) Received: from pcwin002.win.tue.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pcwin002.win.tue.nl (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i8KD34L9007870 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 15:03:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from stijn@pcwin002.win.tue.nl) Received: (from stijn@localhost) by pcwin002.win.tue.nl (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i8KD34Br007869 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 15:03:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from stijn) Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 15:03:04 +0200 From: Stijn Hoop To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040920130304.GK827@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Bright-Idea: Let's abolish HTML mail! Subject: [long] ATA timeout problems on -STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 13:03:06 -0000 Hi, Short explanation: I have a box running 4.10-RELEASE-p2 suffering from severe ATA timeout problems once every few days, and I cannot determine for the life of me what's causing it. I'd really like some hints on how to determine the cause of this, as I think I've ruled out hardware related stuff. Long story: This box consists of - Gigabyte GA-7N400 Pro F8 mobo - Athlon XP 2500+ CPU - 1 Gig PC2700 DDR DRAM in 2 modules - Adaptec 2940 Ultra SCSI adapter - 1 x COMPAQ WDE4550W SCSI-2 4G drive for the OS - 2 x Promise Ultra100 IDE controllers (not the TX2) - 4 x Maxtor 200G 7200 RPM drives, connected to the master/slave positions of the onboard IDE controllers (yes I know better setups exist but these drives wouldn't play nice with the Promises) - 4 x Maxtor 120G 7200 RPM drives, all connected to the 4 master positions on the two promise controllers Now this setup, as you can image, draws a lot of power. The problems actually began a few months back, when I replaced 2 x 60 and 2 x 80 gig drives with the 4 x 200 above. The machine just wouldn't boot or randomly 'lost' IDE drives. A basic working setup I arrived on was to add a second power supply; I was not overjoyed at this but at the time I thought it was more power that was needed. If I determined that this helped enough my plan was to go out and buy an expensive 550W or 600W model. Unfortunately, while things appeared to work at first, once in a while, one of the ATA drives would mysteriously 'fallback to PIO mode' or even indicate that a block could not be read or written. The first few times I took out the indicated drive, ran it through the Maxtor test program, and every time the drive would come back as OK, so it's definitely not the drives. On the ATA drives are 3 vinum RAID-5 setups, and everytime vinum would of course correctly indicate that the affected volume was running in degraded mode. For my experiences with hot rebuilding, see my post from a few weeks back (basically: don't try to do that). In any case, there was no pattern to the failures -- I have seen the exact same error messages on both the onboard IDE controllers and the promises, and with both the 120G and the 200G drives. Here's an example: Sep 17 12:17:20 sandcat /kernel: ad10: DMA problem fallback to PIO mode Sep 17 12:17:20 sandcat last message repeated 4 times Sep 17 12:21:41 sandcat /kernel: ad10s1e: hard error reading fsbn 13008689 of 6504313-6504392 (ad10s1 bn 13008689; cn 12905 tn 7 sn 8) status=59 error=40 Sep 17 12:21:41 sandcat /kernel: vinum: local.p0.s3 is crashed by force Sep 17 12:21:41 sandcat /kernel: vinum: local.p0 is degraded Still suspecting power, I have in the meantime replaced one of the PSU's with another one, and even added a third. All the +12V and +5V amp totals that the PSUs could deliver were triplechecked with the specs of the drives, mobo and CPU, and should have been more than enough. I tried to monitor the voltages with sysutils/xmbmon, and got lines like this: Temp.= 36.0, 49.0, 43.0; Rot.= 3183, 0, 2710 Vcore = 1.65, 2.62; Volt. = 3.34, 4.27, 11.37, -5.34, -1.95 which initially confirmed my suspicions. However the box kept crashing. So, urged by some friends today I took up a multimeter and measured the voltages on the connectors; and this is were I got away totally clueless, because the multimeter measured 5.07V on the +5V line and 12.01V on the +12V. Other than greatly decreasing my confidence in sysutils/xmbmon, this also shattered my PSU theory. Other causes that I can think of are of course heat and memory, but there is no other instability in this box whatsoever. Even when loading all disks at the same time (dd if=/dev/ad[0-10] of=/dev/null bs=1m) and loading the processor with a CPU intensive task, nothing crashes. I would have expected lots of other symptoms (sig11 etc) in case of overheating or bad memory. I'm still planning to do a memtest when I can take the box offline, but I'm skeptical as to the outcome. Besides that, the temperature readings of xmbmon are within the expected ranges. Although of course the question remains whether xmbmon spits out the right values. Basically my question is open-ended: what would you check when confronted with such a situation? I'm really baffled by now, and would *greatly* like to keep this box up for > 1 week... As posted above, this is on 4.10-RELEASE-p2, dmesg & pciconf -lv (along with a copy of this email) available at http://sandcat.nl/~stijn/freebsd/ataproblem/ Thanks for _any_ hints on this... --Stijn -- "Computer games don't affect kids; I mean if Pac-Man affected us as kids, we'd all be running around in darkened rooms, munching magic pills and listening to repetitive electronic music." -- Kristian Wilson, Nintendo, Inc., 1989 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 20 13:34:27 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F9416A4CE for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 13:34:27 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp1.uct.ac.za (smtp1.uct.ac.za [137.158.128.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7CDA43D2D for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 13:34:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lordcow@lhc.phy.uct.ac.za) Received: from anubis.uct.ac.za ([137.158.128.125]) by smtp1.uct.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1C9OJC-000Epk-DD for stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 15:34:22 +0200 Received: from lhc.phy.uct.ac.za ([137.158.37.93]) by anubis.uct.ac.za with esmtp (Exim 4.30; FreeBSD) id 1C9OJC-000MDA-MC for stable@freebsd.org; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 15:34:22 +0200 Received: from lordcow by lhc.phy.uct.ac.za with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1C9OJD-0002HG-00 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 15:34:23 +0200 Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 15:34:23 +0200 From: gareth To: stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040920133423.GA8608@lordcow.org> References: <20040913153540.GA22877@kierun.org> <20040913160111.GA83205@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040913160111.GA83205@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i Sender: Cow Subject: Re: Crash of portsdb X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 13:34:27 -0000 On Mon 2004-09-13 (17:01), Matthew Seaman wrote: > On Mon, Sep 13, 2004 at 04:35:40PM +0100, Yann Golanski wrote: > > I'm getting the following crash: > > > > [Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... - 11732 port > > entries found .........1000.........2000.........3000.........4000.........5000.........6000.........7000.........8000..../usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/portsdb.rb:587: [BUG] Bus Error ruby 1.8.2 (2004-07-29) [i386-freebsd5] > > Abort trap (core dumped) > > Does anyone else get this? > > You and about 10,000 other people. It's been done to death on > freebsd-ports@... freebsd-questions@..., freebsd-current@..., and > probably a few other mailing lists as well. > > The problem is a bug in the underlying BDB v1 btree implementation. > Jun Kuriyama posted a couple of patched for people to try out onto > freebsd-current@... -- this is the most recent one, which might even > work: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2004-September/037222.html > > Porting that to 4-STABLE is left as an exercise. Should be fairly > easy, as the code in question hasn't been modified for 5.x (as far as > I know). > > Otherwise, there's a nice simple low impact workaround: > > # setenv PORTS_DBDRIVER bdb1_hash i gave that a shot ta, & it fixed portsdb, but then i get this: # portversion [Failed `inappropriate file type or format'] [Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... - 11733 port entries found .........1000.........2000.........3000.........4000.........5000......./usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/portsdb.rb:587: [BUG] Segmentation fault ruby 1.8.2 (2004-07-29) [i386-freebsd5] so i went back to using portindex & portindexdb (but when i ran them in a cronjob i got: "env: python: No such file or directory", took awhile to figure out that /etc/crontab defined a new PATH which didn't include /usr/local/bin/). so 'nyway that's fine for now, except for this which isn't actually a problem, just weird?: # /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade -arR cd: can't cd to /usr/ports/sysutils/portindex & that's caus /usr/ports/sysutils/portindex/ doesn't exist all've a sudden, even tho i installed it from there awhile back From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 20 13:43:28 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D4B916A4CE for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 13:43:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (ns0.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.69.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1C1843D48 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 13:43:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk (localhost.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1])i8KDhKZq009559 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:43:20 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: (from matthew@localhost)i8KDhK2T009558; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:43:20 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew) Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:43:20 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman To: gareth Message-ID: <20040920134320.GJ6502@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <20040913153540.GA22877@kierun.org> <20040913160111.GA83205@happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk> <20040920133423.GA8608@lordcow.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="DN8g+DOX2TxGxleI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040920133423.GA8608@lordcow.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.5.6 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:43:20 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040904, clamav-milter version 0.75l on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Crash of portsdb X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 13:43:28 -0000 --DN8g+DOX2TxGxleI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 03:34:23PM +0200, gareth wrote: > On Mon 2004-09-13 (17:01), Matthew Seaman wrote: > > Otherwise, there's a nice simple low impact workaround: > >=20 > > # setenv PORTS_DBDRIVER bdb1_hash =20 > i gave that a shot ta, & it fixed portsdb, but then i get this: >=20 > # portversion > [Failed `inappropriate file type or format'] [Updating the portsdb in /usr/ports ... - 11733 port entries found .........1000...= ......2000.........3000.........4000.........5000......./usr/local/lib/ruby= /site_ruby/1.8/portsdb.rb:587: [BUG] Segmentation fault > ruby 1.8.2 (2004-07-29) [i386-freebsd5] Yes. You have to set that environment variable *every time* you use any of the portupgrade(1) tools, which includes portversion(1) and portsdb(1). You can set it from within /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf if you want -- saves having to keep remembering to do that. Just add: ENV['PORTS_DBDRIVER'] =3D 'bdb1_hash'=20 to that file: right after the whole block of other ENV stuff is a good place. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 26 The Paddocks Savill Way PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Marlow Tel: +44 1628 476614 Bucks., SL7 1TH UK --DN8g+DOX2TxGxleI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBTt54iD657aJF7eIRAtsJAJ9x805gqu/n3RffGKBERbM/XU7C4gCglF1U x7wZPo0w3pdtskom0G+hXgc= =r9VW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --DN8g+DOX2TxGxleI-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 20 21:12:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 874BA16A4CE for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 21:12:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web53808.mail.yahoo.com (web53808.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.36.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E5A4243D46 for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 21:12:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stigmata_blackangel@yahoo.com) Message-ID: <20040920211231.89904.qmail@web53808.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [206.13.45.178] by web53808.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:12:31 PDT Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 14:12:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Gregor Mosheh To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: upgrade questions 4.10 -> 5-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 21:12:32 -0000 I thought I'd ask here... I'm currently running FreeBSD 4.10, and would like to upgrade to a 5.x because of the superior jail support. Which version would you recommend for someone who's really interested in jail support, but doesn't like to live dangerously? Of my hardware, the only item of note is that I use FreeBSD 4.10's ehci driver for USB 2.0 devices. One of the notes in /usr/src/UPDATING was that GCC had been upgraded from my current 2.95 to 3.4 and there are known compatibility problems with the ABI (what's an ABI? the .so's?) Will this upgrade force me to recompile all of my existing C++ stuff, e.g. Postgres and PostGIS, or will my existing binaries continue to run? __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? New and Improved Yahoo! Mail - 100MB free storage! http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 20 23:53:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E979C16A4CE for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 23:53:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from valentine.liquidneon.com (valentine.liquidneon.com [216.38.206.180]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE3DE43D1F for ; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 23:53:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from so14k@so14k.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by valentine.liquidneon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F3EC867; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 17:53:40 -0600 (MDT) Received: from valentine.liquidneon.com ([216.38.206.180]) by localhost (valentine.liquidneon.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 50040-04; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 17:53:40 -0600 (MDT) Received: from boom.house.so14k.com (67-41-215-55.dnvr.qwest.net [67.41.215.55]) by valentine.liquidneon.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C118A377; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 17:53:39 -0600 (MDT) From: Brad Davis To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 17:53:38 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <20040920211231.89904.qmail@web53808.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040920211231.89904.qmail@web53808.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409201753.38308.so14k@so14k.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at liquidneon.com cc: Gregor Mosheh Subject: Re: upgrade questions 4.10 -> 5-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 23:53:41 -0000 On Monday 20 September 2004 15:12, Gregor Mosheh wrote: > I thought I'd ask here... > > I'm currently running FreeBSD 4.10, and would like to > upgrade to a 5.x because of the superior jail support. > > Which version would you recommend for someone who's > really interested in jail support, but doesn't like to > live dangerously? Of my hardware, the only item of > note is that I use FreeBSD 4.10's ehci driver for USB > 2.0 devices. > > One of the notes in /usr/src/UPDATING was that GCC had > been upgraded from my current 2.95 to 3.4 and there > are known compatibility problems with the ABI (what's > an ABI? the .so's?) Will this upgrade force me to > recompile all of my existing C++ stuff, e.g. Postgres > and PostGIS, or will my existing binaries continue to > run? You should wait for 5.3-RELEASE. You will have to recompile every application you use. A doc on upgrading from 4.x to 5.x should be along when 5.3 is released. Regards, Brad -- Beware of Programmers who carry screwdrivers. -- Leonard Brandwein From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 21 03:13:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E415B16A4CE for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 03:13:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from out01.grupos.com.br (out01.grupos.com.br [200.203.183.77]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 674AF43D31 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 03:13:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcus@corp.grupos.com.br) Received: from corp.grupos.com.br (unknown [150.162.166.55]) by out01.grupos.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80E853F7C for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 00:13:53 -0300 (BRT) Received: from corp.grupos.com.br (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by corp.grupos.com.br (Postfix) with SMTP id 0C07720A78 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 00:13:53 -0300 (BRT) Received: from [192.168.1.5] (200-193-076-213.fnsce7006.dsl.brasiltelecom.net.br [200.193.76.213]) by corp.grupos.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FCE220A0F for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 00:13:52 -0300 (BRT) Message-ID: <414F9C6D.9020709@corp.grupos.com.br> Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 00:13:49 -0300 From: Marcus Grando User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (X11/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20040920211231.89904.qmail@web53808.mail.yahoo.com> <200409201753.38308.so14k@so14k.com> In-Reply-To: <200409201753.38308.so14k@so14k.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: upgrade questions 4.10 -> 5-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 03:13:56 -0000 Hi, Here's a preview... FreeBSD 5.3-BETA Migration Guide: http://people.freebsd.org/~bmah/pub/article.html Regards Brad Davis wrote: > On Monday 20 September 2004 15:12, Gregor Mosheh wrote: > >>I thought I'd ask here... >> >>I'm currently running FreeBSD 4.10, and would like to >>upgrade to a 5.x because of the superior jail support. >> >>Which version would you recommend for someone who's >>really interested in jail support, but doesn't like to >>live dangerously? Of my hardware, the only item of >>note is that I use FreeBSD 4.10's ehci driver for USB >>2.0 devices. >> >>One of the notes in /usr/src/UPDATING was that GCC had >>been upgraded from my current 2.95 to 3.4 and there >>are known compatibility problems with the ABI (what's >>an ABI? the .so's?) Will this upgrade force me to >>recompile all of my existing C++ stuff, e.g. Postgres >>and PostGIS, or will my existing binaries continue to >>run? > > > You should wait for 5.3-RELEASE. You will have to recompile every application > you use. A doc on upgrading from 4.x to 5.x should be along when 5.3 is > released. > > > Regards, > Brad > -- Marcus Grando Grupos Internet S/A marcus(at)corp.grupos.com.br From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 21 03:34:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1909F16A4CE for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 03:34:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vscan01.westnet.com.au (vscan01.westnet.com.au [203.10.1.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3C5943D4C for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 03:34:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from christopher@aragorn.home.nu.org) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20931546C8; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 11:34:27 +0800 (WST) Received: from vscan01.westnet.com.au ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (vscan01.westnet.com.au [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00584-04; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 11:34:27 +0800 (WST) Received: from aragorn.home.nu.org (dsl-202-173-130-73.nsw.westnet.com.au [202.173.130.73]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by vscan01.westnet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id B761554637; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 11:34:26 +0800 (WST) Received: from aragorn.home.nu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aragorn.home.nu.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i8L3YOId040775; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:34:24 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from christopher@aragorn.home.nu.org) Received: (from christopher@localhost) by aragorn.home.nu.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i8L3YOLi040774; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:34:24 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from christopher) Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:34:24 +1000 From: Christopher Vance To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, ipfilter@coombs.anu.edu.au Message-ID: <20040921033424.GA1081@nu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Fatal Trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 03:34:30 -0000 Using a very recent 4.10-STABLE GENERIC kernel with ipfilter, I was getting these panics frequently. When I compile a kernel (using make {build,install,}kernel in /usr/src) I always compile all klds, so I don't believe I have anything out of sync. After I compiled a kernel identical to GENERIC except with DDB, call path was generic_bcopy fr_check ip6_input ip6intr swi_net_next Disabling ipfilter has made the panics go away, as of several days ago. Any thoughts? -- Christopher Vance From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 21 04:10:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFDD016A4CE for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 04:10:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from a.mail.sonic.net (a.mail.sonic.net [64.142.16.245]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D600F43D49 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 04:10:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bmah@freebsd.org) Received: from tomcat.kitchenlab.org (adsl-64-142-31-107.sonic.net [64.142.31.107]) by a.mail.sonic.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8L4AMGG006488 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 20 Sep 2004 21:10:23 -0700 Received: from tomcat.kitchenlab.org (localhost.kitchenlab.org [127.0.0.1]) by tomcat.kitchenlab.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i8L4ALgh001030; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 21:10:21 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah@freebsd.org) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by tomcat.kitchenlab.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i8L4AH2i001029; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 21:10:17 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: tomcat.kitchenlab.org: bmah set sender to bmah@freebsd.org using -f Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 21:10:17 -0700 From: "Bruce A. Mah" To: Marcus Grando Message-ID: <20040921041017.GA963@tomcat.kitchenlab.org> References: <20040920211231.89904.qmail@web53808.mail.yahoo.com> <200409201753.38308.so14k@so14k.com> <414F9C6D.9020709@corp.grupos.com.br> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <414F9C6D.9020709@corp.grupos.com.br> X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: upgrade questions 4.10 -> 5-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 04:10:38 -0000 --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline If memory serves me right, Marcus Grando wrote: > FreeBSD 5.3-BETA Migration Guide: > http://people.freebsd.org/~bmah/pub/article.html I actually should take this down since I've revised it since and committed it to FreeBSD CVS (it replaces the Early Adopters Guide on the RELENG_5 branch). Hmmm...I'm not sure if there are any automatically generated copies on the main FreeBSD Web site, but a more permanent location than the above is: http://people.freebsd.org/~bmah/relnotes/ Look for the "5-CURRENT/5-STABLE" section, find the Migration Guide just under that. Cheers, Bruce. --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBT6mo2MoxcVugUsMRAm4pAJ4jJQDSeQTXIXkTcRlG8wx1P+SsAwCg9W5A lFQiKoA0TGeuFT92BVLXXNc= =kPN3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 21 04:49:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A56C16A4CE; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 04:49:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.eos.ocn.ne.jp (eos.ocn.ne.jp [222.146.51.150]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 432E743D41; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 04:49:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from delta.allbsd.org (p43012-adsao12honb4-acca.tokyo.ocn.ne.jp [219.161.232.12]) by smtp.eos.ocn.ne.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1812A3BA8; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:49:36 +0900 (JST) Received: from localhost (alph.allbsd.org [192.168.0.10]) by delta.allbsd.org (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id i8L4L1bT012290; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:21:01 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from hrs@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:20:41 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20040921.132041.45867749.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> To: bmah@FreeBSD.org From: Hiroki Sato In-Reply-To: <20040921041017.GA963@tomcat.kitchenlab.org> References: <200409201753.38308.so14k@so14k.com> <414F9C6D.9020709@corp.grupos.com.br> <20040921041017.GA963@tomcat.kitchenlab.org> X-PGPkey-fingerprint: BDB3 443F A5DD B3D0 A530 FFD7 4F2C D3D8 2793 CF2D X-Mailer: Mew version 4.0.68 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="--Security_Multipart(Tue_Sep_21_13_20_41_2004_806)--" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: marcus@corp.grupos.com.br cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: upgrade questions 4.10 -> 5-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 04:49:37 -0000 ----Security_Multipart(Tue_Sep_21_13_20_41_2004_806)-- Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit "Bruce A. Mah" wrote in <20040921041017.GA963@tomcat.kitchenlab.org>: bmah> Hmmm...I'm not sure if there are any automatically generated copies on bmah> the main FreeBSD Web site, but a more permanent location than the bmah> above is: bmah> bmah> http://people.freebsd.org/~bmah/relnotes/ These are also available from http://www.FreeBSD.org/relnotes/5-STABLE/. -- | Hiroki SATO ----Security_Multipart(Tue_Sep_21_13_20_41_2004_806)-- Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBT6wbTyzT2CeTzy0RAieXAKCUTsrgy8w92gbbQupRW1N/sG0SmQCgmRZx 9U6w6fIA9EtJxmGV0YJ00G4= =a+Au -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ----Security_Multipart(Tue_Sep_21_13_20_41_2004_806)---- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 21 04:58:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D502A16A4CE; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 04:58:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b.mail.sonic.net (b.mail.sonic.net [64.142.19.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA65343D31; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 04:58:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bmah@freebsd.org) Received: from tomcat.kitchenlab.org (adsl-64-142-31-107.sonic.net [64.142.31.107]) by b.mail.sonic.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8L4wlup006502 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 20 Sep 2004 21:58:48 -0700 Received: from tomcat.kitchenlab.org (localhost.kitchenlab.org [127.0.0.1]) by tomcat.kitchenlab.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i8L4wlJG010212; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 21:58:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah@freebsd.org) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by tomcat.kitchenlab.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i8L4wloj010211; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 21:58:47 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: tomcat.kitchenlab.org: bmah set sender to bmah@freebsd.org using -f Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 21:58:47 -0700 From: "Bruce A. Mah" To: Hiroki Sato Message-ID: <20040921045847.GA10200@tomcat.kitchenlab.org> References: <200409201753.38308.so14k@so14k.com> <414F9C6D.9020709@corp.grupos.com.br> <20040921041017.GA963@tomcat.kitchenlab.org> <20040921.132041.45867749.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040921.132041.45867749.hrs@eos.ocn.ne.jp> X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: bmah@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org cc: marcus@corp.grupos.com.br Subject: Re: upgrade questions 4.10 -> 5-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 04:59:00 -0000 --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If memory serves me right, Hiroki Sato wrote: > "Bruce A. Mah" wrote > in <20040921041017.GA963@tomcat.kitchenlab.org>: >=20 > bmah> Hmmm...I'm not sure if there are any automatically generated copies= on > bmah> the main FreeBSD Web site, but a more permanent location than the > bmah> above is: > bmah>=20 > bmah> http://people.freebsd.org/~bmah/relnotes/ >=20 > These are also available from http://www.FreeBSD.org/relnotes/5-STABLE/. That's great, I didn't realize you had started generating those...or maybe I did see this and just forgot about it. Thanks! Bruce. --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBT7UH2MoxcVugUsMRApaHAKDBJfoF2wK23kNwBwdCf0dFfzFSnACgz47g 68krfnq9oC2Q3zGGJRl+XBA= =IhNT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --h31gzZEtNLTqOjlF-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 21 05:29:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47B8216A4CE; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 05:29:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freebsd.takeda.tk (node-402413e2.sna.onnet.us.uu.net [64.36.19.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6168443D46; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 05:29:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from takeda@takeda.tk) Received: from takeda.lan (takeda.lan [10.0.0.3]) by freebsd.takeda.tk (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8L5TEkM053336; Mon, 20 Sep 2004 22:29:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from takeda@takeda.tk) Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2004 22:28:35 -0700 From: Dariusz Kulinski X-Mailer: The Bat! (v2.01) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <127205680265.20040920222835@takeda.tk> To: "Bruce A. Mah" In-Reply-To: <20040921041017.GA963@tomcat.kitchenlab.org> References: <20040920211231.89904.qmail@web53808.mail.yahoo.com> <200409201753.38308.so14k@so14k.com> <414F9C6D.9020709@corp.grupos.com.br> <20040921041017.GA963@tomcat.kitchenlab.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: upgrade questions 4.10 -> 5-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 05:29:20 -0000 Hello Bruce, Monday, September 20, 2004, 9:10:17 PM, you wrote: > If memory serves me right, Marcus Grando wrote: >> FreeBSD 5.3-BETA Migration Guide: >> http://people.freebsd.org/~bmah/pub/article.html > I actually should take this down since I've revised it since and > committed it to FreeBSD CVS (it replaces the Early Adopters Guide on > the RELENG_5 branch). > Hmmm...I'm not sure if there are any automatically generated copies on > the main FreeBSD Web site, but a more permanent location than the > above is: > http://people.freebsd.org/~bmah/relnotes/ > Look for the "5-CURRENT/5-STABLE" section, find the Migration Guide > just under that. It's nice guide, but I personally think there few important thing stat are missing (and I was trying to found answer, but without luck): - what directories, should be especially backed up and restored after upgrade, I know /etc /usr/local/etc, /var/mail /var/cron /var/db what else? - how to upgrade config files while while doing source upgrade, is it possible to use mergemaster, what are recommended steps? Overwrite all the new files and run mergemaster or there is better way? - some other stuff that I just forgot Basically I would like make the migration flawlessly, and in shortest time possible. -- Best regards, Dariusz mailto:takeda@takeda.tk http://www.takeda.tk From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 21 08:08:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D19B16A4CE for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 08:08:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cray.e-card.bg (mjak.e-card.bg [212.91.167.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BFED43D58 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 08:08:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from altares@e-card.bg) Received: from e-card.bg (localhost.e-card.bg [127.0.0.1]) by cray.e-card.bg (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i8L88Uem004940 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 11:08:32 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from altares@e-card.bg) Message-ID: <414FE17E.4060404@e-card.bg> Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 11:08:30 +0300 From: Rumen Telbizov Organization: E-Card Ltd. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: FreeBSD 5.3BETA5 slow network X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: altares@e-card.bg List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 08:08:38 -0000 Dear list, I've been using FreeBSD 5.3 since BETA2 and I have this network performance problem. My network is very slow. I am on a 100Mbit Lan and when I download a file over it from the box next to me I achieve speed of 40KB/s maximum. My previous OS was 4.10 and I did not have this problem. No hardware change made! I read UPDATING and tried to set debug.mpsafenet = 0. Unfortunately it is readonly and cannot be set. My default value of debug.mpsafenet is 1! Putting it into loader.conf doesn't do the trick either. Nor does putting "options NET_WITH_GIANT" into the kernel. My system is: 5.3-BETA5 FreeBSD 5.3-BETA5 #3: Mon Sep 20 19:00:21 EEST 2004 Any ideas are welcome. Thank you in advance. Rumen Telbizov From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 21 08:48:34 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94E2516A4CE; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 08:48:34 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.dannysplace.net (allxs.xs4all.nl [194.109.223.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A521E43D31; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 08:48:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from newsacct01@dannysplace.net) Received: from localhost ([192.168.1.4] helo=U003744) by mail.dannysplace.net with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1C9gK6-000PLR-00; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 10:48:30 +0200 Message-ID: <009f01c49fb7$c4c1e710$1ad0260a@capgemini.nl> From: "Danny Carroll" To: Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 10:37:16 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Problems with fetch but not ftp in a jail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Danny Carroll List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 08:48:34 -0000 I am having a strange problem with my home network. Here is what it looks like. Internet <-> FreeBSD Firewall/Natd box (guard) <------> Local Net (192.168.100.0/24) |------------ testsrv (192.168.100.12) |----- testjail (192.168.10.1) Testjail is a jail (192.168.10.1) running under testsrv (192.168.100.12). Subnet 192.168.10.0/24 is routed to testsrv at the firewall. The nat stuff works fine for everything else. The problem is I cannot do this from testjail (passive mode is needed for my natd setup). fetch -p -v ftp://ftp.nl.freebsd.org/pub/README.nluug As you can imagine it is making it hard to install ports. I can do it from testsrv but not from within the jail. I can do a file transfer (of the same file in passive mode) just by using the ftp client from both testsrv and testjail. It looks to me, but checking the TCPdump output that it's just not requesting the data channel. (Or the data channel is not comming back) as it is able to establish the control channel fine. Has anyone else had some problems like this with fetch in a jail? I am using 5.2.1-RELEASE-p9 and ipfw/natd to do my nat on the firewall (a 4.9 box). -D p.s. I can post tcpdump output if needed. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 21 09:34:47 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D398D16A4CE for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 09:34:47 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cray.e-card.bg (mjak.e-card.bg [212.91.167.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D4EA43D55 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 09:34:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from altares@e-card.bg) Received: from e-card.bg (localhost.e-card.bg [127.0.0.1]) by cray.e-card.bg (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i8L9YhDL016998; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:34:45 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from altares@e-card.bg) Message-ID: <414FF5B3.2060800@e-card.bg> Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:34:43 +0300 From: Rumen Telbizov Organization: E-Card Ltd. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624 Netscape/7.1 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Phil Kernick References: <414FE17E.4060404@e-card.bg> <414FF012.7060200@Kernick.org> In-Reply-To: <414FF012.7060200@Kernick.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3BETA5 slow network X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: altares@e-card.bg List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 09:34:48 -0000 I have just tried that - no effect. The card seems to negotiate the mode to 100baseTX fine when set to autoselect. But it doesn't seem that this is the problem. Thank you anyway Rumen Telbizov Phil Kernick wrote: > Sounds more like a duplex issue. Have you tried forcing it with ifconfig? > > > Phil. > > Rumen Telbizov wrote: > >> Dear list, >> >> I've been using FreeBSD 5.3 since BETA2 and >> I have this network performance problem. >> My network is very slow. I am on a 100Mbit >> Lan and when I download a file over it >> from the box next to me I achieve speed >> of 40KB/s maximum. My previous OS was 4.10 >> and I did not have this problem. No hardware >> change made! >> >> I read UPDATING and tried to set debug.mpsafenet = 0. >> Unfortunately it is readonly and cannot be set. >> My default value of debug.mpsafenet is 1! >> >> Putting it into loader.conf doesn't do the trick >> either. Nor does putting "options NET_WITH_GIANT" >> into the kernel. >> >> My system is: >> 5.3-BETA5 FreeBSD 5.3-BETA5 #3: Mon Sep 20 19:00:21 EEST 2004 >> >> Any ideas are welcome. >> Thank you in advance. >> >> Rumen Telbizov >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 21 12:02:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61FDE16A4CE; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:02:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from email.eurowings.com (email.eurowings.com [193.96.182.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23B7243D4C; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:02:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from h.kipp@eurowings.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by email.eurowings.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E388914E339; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 14:02:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eurowings.com (unknown [10.100.24.81]) by email.eurowings.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFCAD14E366; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:59:12 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <41501790.2030803@eurowings.com> Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:59:12 +0200 From: Holger Kipp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040602 X-Accept-Language: de, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, gnome@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at eurowings.com Subject: Building port textproc/intltool loops indefinitely on FreeBSD 5.3-BETA4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:02:58 -0000 Hello, while trying to build print/apsfilter, textproc/intltool is also build (at least it is trying to do so) with the following neverending loop: ---8<---snip---------------------------------------------- /usr/local/bin/bash ./config.status --recheck running /usr/local/bin/bash ./configure --libdir=/usr/local/libdata --prefix=/usr/local --build=i386-portbld-freebsd5.3 build_alias=i386-portbld-freebsd5.3 --no-create --no-recursion checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for gawk... no checking for mawk... no checking for nawk... nawk checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes checking for perl... /usr/bin/perl checking for XML::Parser... ok configure: creating ./config.status /usr/local/bin/bash ./config.status config.status: creating Makefile config.status: creating doc/Makefile config.status: creating doc-i18n-tool/Makefile config.status: creating intltool-extract.in config.status: creating intltool-merge.in config.status: creating intltool-prepare config.status: creating intltool-unicodify config.status: creating intltool-update.in config.status: creating intltool.spec config.status: creating intltoolize config.status: creating tests/Makefile config.status: creating tests/cases/Makefile config.status: creating tests/results/Makefile config.status: creating tests/selftest.pl config.status: creating xml-i18n-toolize cd . && /bin/sh /usr/ports/textproc/intltool/work/intltool-0.31.2/missing --run aclocal-1.8 aclocal-1.8: not found WARNING: `aclocal-1.8' is missing on your system. You should only need it if you modified `acinclude.m4' or `configure.in'. You might want to install the `Automake' and `Perl' packages. Grab them from any GNU archive site. cd . && /bin/sh /usr/ports/textproc/intltool/work/intltool-0.31.2/missing --run automake-1.8 --gnu automake-1.8: not found WARNING: `automake-1.8' is missing on your system. You should only need it if you modified `Makefile.am', `acinclude.m4' or `configure.in'. You might want to install the `Automake' and `Perl' packages. Grab them from any GNU archive site. cd . && /bin/sh /usr/ports/textproc/intltool/work/intltool-0.31.2/missing --run autoconf autoconf: not found WARNING: `autoconf' is missing on your system. You should only need it if you modified `configure.in'. You might want to install the `Autoconf' and `GNU m4' packages. Grab them from any GNU archive site. /bin/sh ./config.status --recheck ---8<----snip------------------------------------------------------ This is on FreeBSD 5.3-BETA4 #4: Tue Sep 14 15:00:33 CEST 2004. I had installed: automake-1.4.6_1 (due to other port-dependencies) After additionally intalling - devel/automake18 - devel/autoconf259 building intltool had no furhter problems. Could this please be fixed? Regards, Holger Kipp From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 21 13:20:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC2D016A4CE for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:20:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpout-2.iphouse.net (smtpout-2.iphouse.net [216.250.188.191]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CEB543D5A for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:20:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from veldy@veldy.net) Received: from veldy.net (fuggle.veldy.net [209.240.64.129]) by smtpout-2.iphouse.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87BF42B11F3; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 08:19:59 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost.veldy.net [127.0.0.1]) by veldy.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 155F629; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 08:19:59 -0500 (CDT) Received: from veldy.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (fuggle.veldy.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11641-01; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 08:19:55 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (fuggle.veldy.net [192.168.1.3]) by veldy.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE28A26; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 08:19:54 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <41502A69.4020807@veldy.net> Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 08:19:37 -0500 From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gregor Mosheh References: <20040920211231.89904.qmail@web53808.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20040920211231.89904.qmail@web53808.mail.yahoo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.85.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig500583A51F048DB5A0A96132" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at veldy.net cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: upgrade questions 4.10 -> 5-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:20:01 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig500583A51F048DB5A0A96132 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Gregor Mosheh wrote: >I thought I'd ask here... > >I'm currently running FreeBSD 4.10, and would like to >upgrade to a 5.x because of the superior jail support. > >Which version would you recommend for someone who's >really interested in jail support, but doesn't like to >live dangerously? Of my hardware, the only item of >note is that I use FreeBSD 4.10's ehci driver for USB >2.0 devices. > >One of the notes in /usr/src/UPDATING was that GCC had >been upgraded from my current 2.95 to 3.4 and there >are known compatibility problems with the ABI (what's >an ABI? the .so's?) Will this upgrade force me to >recompile all of my existing C++ stuff, e.g. Postgres >and PostGIS, or will my existing binaries continue to >run? > > > I would wait until well after 5.3-RELEASE. There are several bugs in 5.3 that still exist and I don't expect to see them all worked out before the release. There is a USB bug that causes a sig 12 during printing to a USB printer under certain circumstances. EHCI used to force reboots on my machine, but it has been awhile since I checked it out. There are simply a lot of reports of lockups and reboots that would keep me wary for a long time to come [if I had an aversity to risk as you indicate]. Tom Veldhouse --------------enig500583A51F048DB5A0A96132 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBUCpsARgTFXYf0wARAuQhAKCO7kU1lvn0VHxFAqA1p4J5FBwZqwCgwmjY 9kMQR8Ox7p5jzYGAZzjS6qk= =SvI2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig500583A51F048DB5A0A96132-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 21 13:21:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1632E16A4CE for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:21:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpout-2.iphouse.net (smtpout-2.iphouse.net [216.250.188.191]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4BA843D1F for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:21:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from veldy@veldy.net) Received: from veldy.net (fuggle.veldy.net [209.240.64.129]) by smtpout-2.iphouse.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 849FB2B11FF; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 08:21:16 -0500 (CDT) Received: from localhost (localhost.veldy.net [127.0.0.1]) by veldy.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A14629; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 08:21:16 -0500 (CDT) Received: from veldy.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (fuggle.veldy.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11641-02; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 08:21:12 -0500 (CDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (fuggle.veldy.net [192.168.1.3]) by veldy.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C09426; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 08:21:12 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <41502AB9.6020208@veldy.net> Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 08:20:57 -0500 From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.2) Gecko/20040803 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: altares@e-card.bg References: <414FE17E.4060404@e-card.bg> In-Reply-To: <414FE17E.4060404@e-card.bg> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.85.0.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig0B3D9F05E6FCBCDFFC07F379" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at veldy.net cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3BETA5 slow network X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:21:17 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig0B3D9F05E6FCBCDFFC07F379 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Rumen Telbizov wrote: > Dear list, > > I've been using FreeBSD 5.3 since BETA2 and > I have this network performance problem. > My network is very slow. I am on a 100Mbit > Lan and when I download a file over it > from the box next to me I achieve speed > of 40KB/s maximum. My previous OS was 4.10 > and I did not have this problem. No hardware > change made! > > I read UPDATING and tried to set debug.mpsafenet = 0. > Unfortunately it is readonly and cannot be set. > My default value of debug.mpsafenet is 1! > > Putting it into loader.conf doesn't do the trick > either. Nor does putting "options NET_WITH_GIANT" > into the kernel. > > My system is: > 5.3-BETA5 FreeBSD 5.3-BETA5 #3: Mon Sep 20 19:00:21 EEST 2004 > > Any ideas are welcome. > Thank you in advance. > > Rumen Telbizov I have no such problem. If I were you I would see if your network cards are all set the same in either DUPLEX or SIMPLEX mode. If they are mixed you will get the symptoms you mention. Tom Veldhouse --------------enig0B3D9F05E6FCBCDFFC07F379 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFBUCq5ARgTFXYf0wARAkd3AKDGOLgxxhTJOiMnEXIIhTXLNGsZ9gCbBiaw 24u7Nhom1NNzY8rxqUTzjH8= =mAF8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig0B3D9F05E6FCBCDFFC07F379-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 21 15:10:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7F9416A4CE for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 15:10:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pcwin002.win.tue.nl (pcwin002.win.tue.nl [131.155.71.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 175CD43D54 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 15:10:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stijn@pcwin002.win.tue.nl) Received: from pcwin002.win.tue.nl (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pcwin002.win.tue.nl (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i8LFASAW025849; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 17:10:28 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from stijn@pcwin002.win.tue.nl) Received: (from stijn@localhost) by pcwin002.win.tue.nl (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i8LFAS6T025848; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 17:10:28 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from stijn) Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 17:10:28 +0200 From: Stijn Hoop To: Paul Mather Message-ID: <20040921151028.GA839@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> References: <20040920130304.GK827@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> <1095694550.99333.20.camel@zappa.Chelsea-Ct.Org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="opJtzjQTFsWo+cga" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1095694550.99333.20.camel@zappa.Chelsea-Ct.Org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Bright-Idea: Let's abolish HTML mail! cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [long] ATA timeout problems on -STABLE X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 15:10:30 -0000 --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, thanks for your response. On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 11:35:52AM -0400, Paul Mather wrote: > FWIW, when I would get those errors on my 4-STABLE system (fallback to > PIO mode; hard error reading fbsn) it did turn out to be a drive problem > (and with a Maxtor drive, too). I was none the wiser until I happened > to reboot the machine after a security advisory upgrade and was > surprised to see the boot halted because the S.M.A.R.T. status of the > drive indicated it was failing! (Prior to that I'd just been assuming > it was some kind of OS/peak load problem and had been using atacontrol > to change the mode back to UDMA100 when it fell back to PIO.) Interesting. I have also done the same in the few rare cases where the drive would indeed read/write the block in PIO mode. Most of the time the ata subsystem would just give up on the drive. > So, I would suggest running smartctl from the sysutils/smartmontools > port to see what the SMART status of the drives looks like; in > particular, whether any of the "worst" values have dropped anywhere > close to the failure threshold value. (I have noticed with smartctl > that some attributes go down and then back up. I have a system, in > particular, where the Raw_Read_Error_Rate attribute sometimes drops down > a few points under heavy disk load [e.g., during the nightly backup or > cvsup], but increases again after the load has lifted.) >=20 > Unfortunately, you're running 4.x, so you might have to make a 5.x > FreeSBIE CD with the smartmontools port included because it requires > ATAng from 5.x to run. That's a great suggestion that hadn't crossed my mind. As the box had another error just this morning I took some time when I had = to take it offline to rebuild the RAID array, and put the 4 120G disks (which definitely generate the most errors) in a 5.x system with the smartmontools port installed. Logs of smartctl -a are up at http://sandcat.nl/~stijn/freebsd/ataproblem/ I don't have a clue how to interpret all these numbers though. A little googling turns up posts that UNC errors are Bad(TM), however that would indicate that I have indeed 3(!) failing drives on my hands... Although certainly possible (they are about 1-2 years old in continuous use), it does sound improbable. > You can also use smartctl to run online and offline self-tests. I didn't have time to run the long tests, but all 4 drives indicated a 'passed' status for the online 'smartctl -t short' test. I take it the long tests give better results? If so I'll take the time to run them on the next rebuild downtime. But anyway if the drives are dying, I'll accept that. I just don't know for sure how to determine that. Do you have pointers for me to read more about SMART statistics? --Stijn --=20 An Orb is for life, not just for Christmas. --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBUERkY3r/tLQmfWcRAgw5AJ9sutBGhKadkSDSkYfR/mBZHgJPvACdEbxr Yi864wrwLhgT72zZDvtrzjw= =GTct -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --opJtzjQTFsWo+cga-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 21 15:41:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E37B16A4CF; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 15:41:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b.mail.sonic.net (b.mail.sonic.net [64.142.19.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB04943D31; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 15:41:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bmah@freebsd.org) Received: from tomcat.kitchenlab.org (adsl-64-142-31-107.sonic.net [64.142.31.107]) by b.mail.sonic.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8LFfGqS013179 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Tue, 21 Sep 2004 08:41:16 -0700 Received: from tomcat.kitchenlab.org (localhost.kitchenlab.org [127.0.0.1]) by tomcat.kitchenlab.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i8LFfGvw036755; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 08:41:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah@freebsd.org) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by tomcat.kitchenlab.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i8LFfG6K036754; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 08:41:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: tomcat.kitchenlab.org: bmah set sender to bmah@freebsd.org using -f Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 08:41:16 -0700 From: "Bruce A. Mah" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040921154116.GB36705@tomcat.kitchenlab.org> References: <20040920211231.89904.qmail@web53808.mail.yahoo.com> <200409201753.38308.so14k@so14k.com> <414F9C6D.9020709@corp.grupos.com.br> <20040921041017.GA963@tomcat.kitchenlab.org> <127205680265.20040920222835@takeda.tk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IiVenqGWf+H9Y6IX" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <127205680265.20040920222835@takeda.tk> X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: "Bruce A. Mah" Subject: Re: upgrade questions 4.10 -> 5-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 15:41:17 -0000 --IiVenqGWf+H9Y6IX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline If memory serves me right, Dariusz Kulinski wrote: > It's nice guide, but I personally think there few important thing stat > are missing (and I was trying to found answer, but without luck): > - what directories, should be especially backed up and restored after > upgrade, I know /etc /usr/local/etc, /var/mail /var/cron /var/db > what else? As a rule of thumb, back up everything. For the case of a reinstalling from installation media, what to restore depends on how you've configured your system. It's beyond the scope of the document to try to enumerate all possible directories that might be holding data you care about. At a bare minimum, things I usually care about on my systems can be found in /boot, /etc, /usr/local/etc, /var, and whereever home directories live. Beyond that, it depends too much on how your own system is set up. That's why you want to make sure you've saved *everything* to backup media, so if you miss restoring something you can always go back and get it later. For the case of a source upgrade, you still want to back up everything, but since most of what's overwritten is your base system, you won't be restoring anything explicitly unless you mess something up. > - how to upgrade config files while while doing source upgrade, is it > possible to use mergemaster, what are recommended steps? > Overwrite all the new files and run mergemaster or there is better > way? Step 16 of the source upgrade procedure says specifically to use "mergemaster -i". > - some other stuff that I just forgot Sorry, can't help you with that part. > Basically I would like make the migration flawlessly, and in shortest > time possible. In my experience, sometimes those two goals are at odds with each other. You didn't say anything about the machine(s) you're trying to upgrade, but if any of them happen to be providing mission-critical services, I highly recommend running through the upgrade process on a scratch machine first. Or even better, build up a new system and gradually migrate data and services over to it. Bruce. --IiVenqGWf+H9Y6IX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBUEub2MoxcVugUsMRAj35AKCryX2LyAu1K1aXz6bmOh517iO1zgCfVJUq Iz/R7JAa1hBP4u+KNJ5eI0U= =YdSY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IiVenqGWf+H9Y6IX-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 21 15:59:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ABA216A4CE for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 15:59:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail1.thewrittenword.com (mail1.thewrittenword.com [67.95.107.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 080D343D53 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 15:59:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@mlists.thewrittenword.com) Received: by mail1.thewrittenword.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7CE721E3; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 10:59:30 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 10:59:30 -0500 From: Albert Chin To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040921155930.GF72513@mail1.thewrittenword.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: 4-STABLE and 3Ware 9000 series controllers X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 15:59:31 -0000 Anyone having good results with 4-STABLE and the 3Ware 9000 series controllers? -- albert chin (china@thewrittenword.com) From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 21 16:38:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BE1A16A4CE for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 16:38:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rocky.mintel.co.uk (rocky2.mintel.com [217.206.187.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CA4A43D46 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 16:38:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jason.thomson@mintel.com) Received: from [10.0.62.5] ([10.0.62.5]) by rocky.mintel.co.uk (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i8LGcIrI013676 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 17:38:18 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jason.thomson@mintel.com) Message-ID: <415058FA.1090709@mintel.com> Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 17:38:18 +0100 From: Jason Thomson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20040921155930.GF72513@mail1.thewrittenword.com> In-Reply-To: <20040921155930.GF72513@mail1.thewrittenword.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.28 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) Subject: Re: 4-STABLE and 3Ware 9000 series controllers X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 16:38:25 -0000 We have a one machine with a 9500S-4 controller in RAID 10 configuration. Performance in RAID10 configuration is subjectively no different to the 7506-4 in RAID10. (Both cards seem excellent with similar disks - WD 200GB / 8MB cache drives). We haven't done any systematic testing. AFAIK the real advantage for the 9000 series cards is for RAID5 arrays. A few caveats: 1. The firmware is included in the driver. The driver will update the card's firmware if the driver has more recent firmware than the card. The firmware that came with the 4-STABLE driver at the beginning of August was quite old; we had to kldload a more recent driver from the 3ware website in order to complete the install. 2. We haven't been able to get 3dm2 working on this machine. (But the CLI does work). We haven't spent a huge amount of time on it yet - but do want to get it working to remotely monitor the array / generate alerts. If anyone has got 3dm2 working with FreeBSD 4.x I'd be really interested to know. Albert Chin wrote: > Anyone having good results with 4-STABLE and the 3Ware 9000 series > controllers? > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 21 17:01:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7861416A4CE for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 17:01:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from email.eurowings.com (email.eurowings.com [193.96.182.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 281C143D48 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 17:01:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from h.kipp@eurowings.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by email.eurowings.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D51714E244; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 19:01:35 +0200 (CEST) Received: from eurowings.com (unknown [10.100.24.81]) by email.eurowings.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 313A414E23D; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 19:01:33 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <41505E6C.50007@eurowings.com> Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 19:01:32 +0200 From: Holger Kipp User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040602 X-Accept-Language: de, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at eurowings.com Subject: RE: Building port textproc/intltool loops indefinitely on FreeBSD 5.3-BETA4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 17:01:36 -0000 Hello, I have hit a very interesting problem: the infinite loop I encountered with textproc/intltool during build of print/apsfilter also happens with obviously all other ports apsfilter depends on, eg devel/libbonobo graphics/libgnomecanvas devel/libIDL devel/ORBit2 etc., all with a message similar to: configure: creating ./config.status cd . && /usr/local/bin/bash ./config.status Makefile config.status: creating Makefile cd . && /bin/sh /usr/ports/accessibility/gail/work/gail-1.6.6/missing --run aclocal-1.7 aclocal-1.7: not found WARNING: `aclocal-1.7' is missing on your system. You should only need it if you modified `acinclude.m4' or `configure.in'. You might want to install the `Automake' and `Perl' packages. Grab them from any GNU archive site. cd . && \ /bin/sh /usr/ports/accessibility/gail/work/gail-1.6.6/missing --run automake-1.7 --gnu Makefile automake-1.7: not found WARNING: `automake-1.7' is missing on your system. You should only need it if you modified `Makefile.am', `acinclude.m4' or `configure.in'. You might want to install the `Automake' and `Perl' packages. Grab them from any GNU archive site. cd . && /bin/sh /usr/ports/accessibility/gail/work/gail-1.6.6/missing --run autoconf autoconf: not found WARNING: `autoconf' is missing on your system. You should only need it if you modified `configure.in'. You might want to install the `Autoconf' and `GNU m4' packages. Grab them from any GNU archive site. /bin/sh ./config.status --recheck (some won't output this, but just go within a loop around forever) If I press ctrl-C, change to the offending directory/port - in this case /usr/ports/accessibility/gail and do a make port there, it just plain succeeds (even though I only have autoconf14 and autoconf18 installed). Any ideas? Or am I just plain stupid, not seeing the obvious? Regards, Holger Kipp From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 21 17:20:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D9F816A4E8; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 17:20:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freebsd.takeda.tk (node-402413e2.sna.onnet.us.uu.net [64.36.19.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45ADC43D48; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 17:20:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from takeda@takeda.tk) Received: from takeda.lan (takeda.lan [10.0.0.3]) by freebsd.takeda.tk (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8LHKWSc066425; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 10:20:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from takeda@takeda.tk) Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 10:05:34 -0700 From: Dariusz Kulinski X-Mailer: The Bat! (v2.01) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <12247499375.20040921100534@takeda.tk> To: "Bruce A. Mah" In-Reply-To: <20040921154116.GB36705@tomcat.kitchenlab.org> References: <20040920211231.89904.qmail@web53808.mail.yahoo.com> <200409201753.38308.so14k@so14k.com> <414F9C6D.9020709@corp.grupos.com.br> <20040921041017.GA963@tomcat.kitchenlab.org> <127205680265.20040920222835@takeda.tk> <20040921154116.GB36705@tomcat.kitchenlab.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: upgrade questions 4.10 -> 5-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 17:20:38 -0000 Hello Bruce, Tuesday, September 21, 2004, 8:41:16 AM, you wrote: >> It's nice guide, but I personally think there few important thing stat >> are missing (and I was trying to found answer, but without luck): >> - what directories, should be especially backed up and restored after >> upgrade, I know /etc /usr/local/etc, /var/mail /var/cron /var/db >> what else? > For the case of a reinstalling from installation media, what to > restore depends on how you've configured your system. It's beyond the > scope of the document to try to enumerate all possible directories > that might be holding data you care about. At a bare minimum, things > I usually care about on my systems can be found in /boot, /etc, > /usr/local/etc, /var, and whereever home directories live. Beyond > that, it depends too much on how your own system is set up. That's > why you want to make sure you've saved *everything* to backup media, > so if you miss restoring something you can always go back and get it > later. What about directories that I definitively shouldn't restore, for example: /usr/include /usr/lib most likely /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin /stand and so on, maybe that could help me better. >> - how to upgrade config files while while doing source upgrade, is it >> possible to use mergemaster, what are recommended steps? >> Overwrite all the new files and run mergemaster or there is better >> way? > Step 16 of the source upgrade procedure says specifically to use > "mergemaster -i". That step was in source upgrade category, so I assumed it might not be correct for binary upgrade. >> - some other stuff that I just forgot > Sorry, can't help you with that part. What about ports, I know that I need to recompile them, but will they work for that time? >> Basically I would like make the migration flawlessly, and in shortest >> time possible. > In my experience, sometimes those two goals are at odds with each > other. > You didn't say anything about the machine(s) you're trying to upgrade, > but if any of them happen to be providing mission-critical services, I > highly recommend running through the upgrade process on a scratch > machine first. Or even better, build up a new system and gradually > migrate data and services over to it. It's not really mission-critical, but it's like that for me :) It works as my mail/web server so I want to have shortest downtime possible :) -- Best regards, Dariusz mailto:takeda@takeda.tk CCNA, SCSA, SCNA, LPIC, MCP certified http://www.takeda.tk From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 21 17:42:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFDF316A4CE for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 17:42:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from maxlor.mine.nu (c-213-160-32-54.customer.ggaweb.ch [213.160.32.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 715ED43D48 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 17:42:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from benlutz@datacomm.ch) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maxlor.mine.nu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C198240 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 19:42:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from maxlor.mine.nu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (midgard [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 72320-03 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 19:42:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from merlin.intranet (merlin.intranet [10.0.0.16]) by maxlor.mine.nu (Postfix) with SMTP id D71D3217 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 19:42:23 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 19:42:21 +0200 From: Benjamin Lutz To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20040921194221.56268155.benlutz@datacomm.ch> In-Reply-To: <415058FA.1090709@mintel.com> References: <20040921155930.GF72513@mail1.thewrittenword.com> <415058FA.1090709@mintel.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.12-gtk2-20040622 (GTK+ 2.4.9; i386-portbld-freebsd5.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"; boundary="Signature=_Tue__21_Sep_2004_19_42_22_+0200_Q8hjqPUlHsOouEFg" X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at maxlor.mine.nu Subject: Re: 4-STABLE and 3Ware 9000 series controllers X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 17:42:27 -0000 --Signature=_Tue__21_Sep_2004_19_42_22_+0200_Q8hjqPUlHsOouEFg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > 2. We haven't been able to get 3dm2 working on this machine. (But the > CLI does work). We haven't spent a huge amount of time on it yet - but > do want to get it working to remotely monitor the array / generate > alerts. > > > If anyone has got 3dm2 working with FreeBSD 4.x I'd be really interested > to know. I have it working on a FreeBSD 5.x machine. What exactly doesn't work for you? If the service is running, but you can't seem to access it with your webbrowser, make sure you're using https instead of http, and port number 888. Benjamin --Signature=_Tue__21_Sep_2004_19_42_22_+0200_Q8hjqPUlHsOouEFg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBUGgAgShs4qbRdeQRArBFAJ9WlxpAsulgFHnmaoBqv1ClDpKgFgCfToua sN/f0doAlze2IUKDga6F6nc= =xovG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Signature=_Tue__21_Sep_2004_19_42_22_+0200_Q8hjqPUlHsOouEFg-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 21 18:03:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 195F116A4CE for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 18:03:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ntw1.ymcastlouis.org (mail.ymcastlouis.org [66.134.157.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0F1443D5C for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 18:03:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jcaldwell@ymcastlouis.org) To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.0.3 September 26, 2003 Message-ID: From: jcaldwell@ymcastlouis.org Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:05:44 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ntw1/YMCASTLOUIS.ORG(Release 6.5.2|June 01, 2004) at 09/21/2004 13:05:47, Serialize complete at 09/21/2004 13:05:47 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 Subject: nss_ldap - working or not, and how to? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 18:03:19 -0000 I'm in desperate need of nss_ldap - it's one of the reasons I'm moving from NetBSD to FreeBSD - and wondering what the current state of it is, with 5.3BetaX? Also, is there anyone/where that can tell me what steps are needed to hook it into the system? I know it means recompiling some things, but I don't know exactly what and can't seem to find any good source. Any help at all would be appreciated. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 21 18:27:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B02C16A4CE for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 18:27:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E972143D2D for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 18:27:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 79so1674118rnk for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 11:27:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.15.66 with SMTP id 66mr3230507rno; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 11:27:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.75.49 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 11:27:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <790a9fff04092111274eb88b5e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:27:02 -0500 From: Scot Hetzel To: "jcaldwell@ymcastlouis.org" In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nss_ldap - working or not, and how to? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Scot Hetzel List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 18:27:17 -0000 On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:05:44 -0500, jcaldwell@ymcastlouis.org wrote: > I'm in desperate need of nss_ldap - it's one of the reasons I'm moving > from NetBSD to FreeBSD - and wondering what the current state of it is, > with 5.3BetaX? Also, is there anyone/where that can tell me what steps are > needed to hook it into the system? I know it means recompiling some > things, but I don't know exactly what and can't seem to find any good > source. > > Any help at all would be appreciated. I believe all you need to do is install the nss_ldap port, set up the ldap server, and add ldap to /etc/nsswitch.conf on 5.x+. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 21 18:39:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A72D516A508 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 18:39:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ntw1.ymcastlouis.org (mail.ymcastlouis.org [66.134.157.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5676243D4C for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 18:39:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jcaldwell@ymcastlouis.org) In-Reply-To: <790a9fff04092111274eb88b5e@mail.gmail.com> To: Scot Hetzel MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.0.3 September 26, 2003 Message-ID: From: jcaldwell@ymcastlouis.org Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:41:42 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ntw1/YMCASTLOUIS.ORG(Release 6.5.2|June 01, 2004) at 09/21/2004 13:41:43, Serialize complete at 09/21/2004 13:41:43 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nss_ldap - working or not, and how to? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 18:39:15 -0000 Nope - that doesn't do the trick. I believe I saw something about having to recompile BIND, but there weren't any details. Scot Hetzel wrote on 09/21/2004 01:27:02 PM: > On Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:05:44 -0500, jcaldwell@ymcastlouis.org > wrote: > > I'm in desperate need of nss_ldap - it's one of the reasons I'm moving > > from NetBSD to FreeBSD - and wondering what the current state of it is, > > with 5.3BetaX? Also, is there anyone/where that can tell me what steps are > > needed to hook it into the system? I know it means recompiling some > > things, but I don't know exactly what and can't seem to find any good > > source. > > > > Any help at all would be appreciated. > > I believe all you need to do is install the nss_ldap port, set up the > ldap server, and add ldap to /etc/nsswitch.conf on 5.x+. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 21 18:57:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67FA316A4CE for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 18:57:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13D9343D48 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 18:57:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 79so1683631rnk for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 11:57:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.82.75 with SMTP id f75mr2945834rnb; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 11:57:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.75.49 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 11:57:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <790a9fff0409211157303bfe53@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 13:57:40 -0500 From: Scot Hetzel To: "jcaldwell@ymcastlouis.org" In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <790a9fff04092111274eb88b5e@mail.gmail.com> cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nss_ldap - working or not, and how to? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Scot Hetzel List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 18:57:48 -0000 From: jcaldwell@ymcastlouis.org > Nope - that doesn't do the trick. I believe I saw something about having to > recompile BIND, but there weren't any details. > If we had a few more details as to what your setting up. For logins and user/group permissions you need nss_ldap & pam_ldap installed. As for BIND, you need to install the dns/bind9-dlz. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 21 19:07:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 316AB16A4DF for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 19:07:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ntw1.ymcastlouis.org (mail.ymcastlouis.org [66.134.157.124]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 705F843D3F for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 19:07:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jcaldwell@ymcastlouis.org) In-Reply-To: <790a9fff0409211157303bfe53@mail.gmail.com> To: Scot Hetzel MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 6.0.3 September 26, 2003 Message-ID: From: jcaldwell@ymcastlouis.org Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 14:09:00 -0500 X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on ntw1/YMCASTLOUIS.ORG(Release 6.5.2|June 01, 2004) at 09/21/2004 14:10:01, Serialize complete at 09/21/2004 14:10:01 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nss_ldap - working or not, and how to? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 19:07:32 -0000 Specifically what I'm looking for is just User/Group stuff. I'm setting up a distributed Samba network - actually migrating from Novell Netware to FreeBSD/Samba. It seems like the only sane way to approach that (with 22 servers, scattered across 20 locations) is with nss_ldap. I'll check out pam_ldap as well - thanks for the pointer. Scot Hetzel wrote on 09/21/2004 01:57:40 PM: > From: jcaldwell@ymcastlouis.org > > Nope - that doesn't do the trick. I believe I saw something about having to > > recompile BIND, but there weren't any details. > > > If we had a few more details as to what your setting up. > > For logins and user/group permissions you need nss_ldap & pam_ldap installed. > > As for BIND, you need to install the dns/bind9-dlz. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 21 19:15:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87D4816A4CE for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 19:15:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92E2543D1F for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 19:15:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wireless.insecurity@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 74so1554200rnk for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:14:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.207.19 with SMTP id e19mr473989rng; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:14:23 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.9.34 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 12:14:23 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3daf27660409211214776ec6fd@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 15:14:23 -0400 From: Benjamin Cance To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: FreeBSD 5.3 Beta and Linksys PCMLM56 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Benjamin Cance List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 19:15:37 -0000 Sorry if this has been discussed somewhere, but i've been searching high and low for an answer and haven't come across one.. How do you configure the PCMLM56 Combo card (i'm just interested in Ethernet) within FreeBSD.. I've rebuild the kernel, ensured the drivers are they, and yet DMESG comes up with unknowns within the card info. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 21 23:31:06 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D73316A4CE for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 23:31:06 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.bitfreak.org (mail.bitfreak.org [65.75.198.146]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0377343D5A for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 23:31:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmp@bitfreak.org) Received: from speck.loki.lan (c-24-21-241-225.client.comcast.net [24.21.241.225]) by mail.bitfreak.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1947E19F3C; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 16:31:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spud (d2.loki.lan [172.21.42.22]) by speck.loki.lan (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6855F3250; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 16:30:58 -0700 (PDT) From: "Darren Pilgrim" To: "'Jason Thomson'" , Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 16:30:47 -0700 Message-ID: <000801c4a033$08ec32d0$162a15ac@spud> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 In-Reply-To: <415058FA.1090709@mintel.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Subject: RE: 4-STABLE and 3Ware 9000 series controllers X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 23:31:06 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Jason Thomson > Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 9:38 AM > To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: 4-STABLE and 3Ware 9000 series controllers > > > We have a one machine with a 9500S-4 controller in RAID 10 > configuration. > > Performance in RAID10 configuration is subjectively no > different to the > 7506-4 in RAID10. (Both cards seem excellent with similar disks - WD > 200GB / 8MB cache drives). We haven't done any systematic testing. > > AFAIK the real advantage for the 9000 series cards is for > RAID5 arrays. > > A few caveats: > > 1. The firmware is included in the driver. The driver will > update the > card's firmware if the driver has more recent firmware than the card. > The firmware that came with the 4-STABLE driver at the beginning of > August was quite old; we had to kldload a more recent driver from the > 3ware website in order to complete the install. > > 2. We haven't been able to get 3dm2 working on this machine. (But the > CLI does work). We haven't spent a huge amount of time on it yet - but > do want to get it working to remotely monitor the array / generate > alerts. I'm not surprised, the version for FreeBSD is a very poor port from a Linux version that uses Linux-style file placement and init scripts. It's sickening to read through. But then this is from the same people whose single "BSD guy" got confused when I asked what value for CPUTYPE was used when compiling the twe module and tw_cli software. Does anyone have a rewritten installer script and/or an rc.subr-style startup script for 3dm2? From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 22 00:50:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A218E16A4CE for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 00:50:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from lists.frmug.org (frmug-gw.frmug.org [193.56.58.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCE3643D1F for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 00:50:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from olive@oban.frmug.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.frmug.org (Postfix/TLS) with ESMTP id 42E4E20F64 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 02:50:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lists.frmug.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (frmug.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 31996-09 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 02:50:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: by lists.frmug.org (Postfix/TLS, from userid 66) id BA70D20F5F; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 02:50:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by weirdos.oban.frmug.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 916248C4B for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 02:47:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: by weirdos.oban.frmug.org (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 06ACA8C40; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 02:47:30 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 02:47:30 +0200 From: Olivier Tharan To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040922004730.GY86550@weirdos.oban.frmug.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <790a9fff0409211157303bfe53@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Attribution: Olive X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at frmug.org Subject: Re: nss_ldap - working or not, and how to? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 00:50:23 -0000 * jcaldwell@ymcastlouis.org (20040921 14:09): > Specifically what I'm looking for is just User/Group stuff. I'm setting up > a distributed Samba network - actually migrating from Novell Netware to > FreeBSD/Samba. It seems like the only sane way to approach that (with 22 > servers, scattered across 20 locations) is with nss_ldap. I'll check out > pam_ldap as well - thanks for the pointer. nss_ldap does just the uid/name lookup, pam_ldap does the authentication/authorization thing. If you only need user/group stuff, Bind does not need to be recompiled. I remember having installed the nss_ldap port, changed settings in /usr/local/etc/ldap.conf (or whatever nss_ldap installs), changed /etc/nsswitch.conf to use nss_ldap and that was about all. The documentation for nss_ldap is not always clear, but if you know your LDAP installation well, it is ok. -- olive From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 22 01:44:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A64E716A4CE for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 01:44:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail1.thewrittenword.com (mail1.thewrittenword.com [67.95.107.114]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34D1943D41 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 01:44:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-stable@mlists.thewrittenword.com) Received: by mail1.thewrittenword.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C83E4121; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 20:44:42 -0500 (CDT) Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 20:44:42 -0500 From: Albert Chin To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040922014442.GA97251@mail1.thewrittenword.com> References: <20040921155930.GF72513@mail1.thewrittenword.com> <415058FA.1090709@mintel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <415058FA.1090709@mintel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: 4-STABLE and 3Ware 9000 series controllers X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 01:44:43 -0000 On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 05:38:18PM +0100, Jason Thomson wrote: > A few caveats: > > 1. The firmware is included in the driver. The driver will update the > card's firmware if the driver has more recent firmware than the card. > The firmware that came with the 4-STABLE driver at the beginning of > August was quite old; we had to kldload a more recent driver from the > 3ware website in order to complete the install. I went through the software download procedure on their web site and was able to download 9.0.2-Upgrade.zip. So is it a bad idea to use an older driver with the firmware from this package? It seems you can -UTWA_FLASH_FIRMWARE and the driver won't flash the firmware on you. -- albert chin (china@thewrittenword.com) From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 22 02:00:46 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52DF216A4D3 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 02:00:46 +0000 (GMT) Received: from acheron.ne.client2.attbi.com (acheron.ne.client2.attbi.com [66.31.145.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9D3343D5E for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 02:00:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msh@acheron.middleboro.ma.us) Received: from acheron.ne.client2.attbi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i8M20gai019662 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 22:00:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from msh@localhost)i8M20glm000601 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 22:00:42 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 22:00:42 -0400 From: Matt Herzog To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040922020042.GR5586@acheron.in.hades> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.4 (acheron.ne.client2.attbi.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 21 Sep 2004 22:00:42 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Firefox fails to build X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 02:00:46 -0000 Hello All. I'm trying to build Firefox 0.9.3 on 4.10 FreeBSD. I updated ports before I attempted this build. I am running FreeBSD on a dual P3 system. Any advice would be welcome. /lib/libfreebl.a /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla/dist/lib/libsecutil.a /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla/dist/lib/libdbm.a -L/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla/dist/lib -lplc4 -lplds4 -lnspr4 -pthread ../../../../coreconf/nsinstall/FreeBSD4.10_DBG.OBJ/nsinstall -R -m 775 FreeBSD4.10_DBG.OBJ/mangle /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla/dist/bin gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla/security/nss/cmd/shlibsign/mangle' FreeBSD4.10_DBG.OBJ/shlibsign -v -i /usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla/dist/lib/libsoftokn3.so Assertion failure: -1 != pt_book.minPrio, at ptthread.c:843 Abort trap (core dumped) gmake[3]: *** [/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla/dist/lib/libsoftokn3.chk] Error 134 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla/security/nss/cmd/shlibsign' gmake[2]: *** [libs] Error 2 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla/security/manager' gmake[1]: *** [tier_40] Error 2 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla' gmake: *** [default] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/www/firefox. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 22 02:14:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D50416A4CE for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 02:14:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hadar.amcc.com (hadar.amcc.com [192.195.69.168]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 643AA43D46 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 02:14:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vkashyap@amcc.com) Received: from mailhost02.amcc.com ([192.195.69.49]) by hadar.amcc.com (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with SMTP id I4F7KY00.0JS for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 19:14:58 -0700 Received: (from vkashyap-pc [10.66.6.61]) by mailhost02.amcc.com (SMSSMTP 4.0.0.59) with SMTP id M2004092119153024076 for ; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 19:15:30 -0700 From: "Vinod Kashyap" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 19:14:50 -0700 X-Sent-Folder-Path: Sent Items X-Mailer: Oracle Connector for Outlook 9.0.4 51114 (9.0.6627) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: Subject: RE: 4-STABLE and 3Ware 9000 series controllers X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 02:14:56 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Albert Chin > Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2004 6:45 PM > To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: 4-STABLE and 3Ware 9000 series controllers > = > = > On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 05:38:18PM +0100, Jason Thomson wrote: > > A few caveats: > > = > > 1. The firmware is included in the driver. The driver = > will update the > > card's firmware if the driver has more recent firmware than = > the card. > > The firmware that came with the 4-STABLE driver at the beginning of > > August was quite old; we had to kldload a more recent = > driver from the > > 3ware website in order to complete the install. > = > I went through the software download procedure on their web site and > was able to download 9.0.2-Upgrade.zip. So is it a bad idea to use an > older driver with the firmware from this package? It seems you can > -UTWA_FLASH_FIRMWARE and the driver won't flash the firmware on you. > = The driver will not flash firmware if the firmware image it is bundled with, is older than the firmware on the controller. Of course, you can always disable flashing by not defining TWA_FLASH_FIRMWARE. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 22 02:51:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0241D16A4CE for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 02:51:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.faerunconsulting.com (vadsl-pppoe-jcnj-cst-216-182-31-61.tellurian.net [216.182.31.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D963943D46 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 02:51:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from me@carrollkong.com) Received: (qmail 25116 invoked from network); 22 Sep 2004 02:51:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO athena) (192.168.0.2) by dmz.faerunhome.com with SMTP; 22 Sep 2004 02:51:25 -0000 Message-ID: <023c01c4a04f$0d2dea70$0200a8c0@athena> From: "Carroll Kong" To: "Carroll Kong" , "Anton Ivanov" , References: <40CD80F1.6020107@mintel.com> <41402CA2.90801@mintel.com><1bfe01c496b8$f957b480$0200a8c0@athena> <200409131700.53789.ai1@ipaccess.com> <202801c49a0e$f2ca9980$0200a8c0@athena> Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 22:51:19 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4942.400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4942.400 cc: Jason Thomson Subject: Re: 3ware 7506, FreeBSD 4.x, Maxtor Disks & SMART Problems. X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 02:51:30 -0000 Got the 3Ware 7450's firmware upgraded. Swapped out the one maxtor disk that showed some errors, reran the smartctl -t long tests and made sure every disk succeeded. The box still randomly hangs and it looks strongly like it is I/O related. I wonder if my controller itself is bad. I am about ready to give up on this setup. Problem is swapping out the card means a new riser card, well at least in theory to handle the 64 bit / 66 mhz issue with risers that 3ware has. Or I can trust 3ware's tech support that all new cards are already fixed. Heh. Or we can watch as nothing else is fixed. Or maybe it's the interconnects, (cold swap ATA backplane) but I do not see how that should lead to a full fledged I/O hang error. twe0: <3ware Storage Controller driver ver. 1.40.01.002> port 0xc800-0xc80f mem 0xfe000000-0xfe7fffff,0xfeaffc00-0xfeaffc0f irq 2 at device 7.0 on pci1 twe0: 4 ports, Firmware FE7X 1.05.00.068, BIOS BE7X 1.08.00.048 - Carroll Kong ----- Original Message ----- From: "Carroll Kong" To: "Anton Ivanov" ; Cc: "Jason Thomson" Sent: Monday, September 13, 2004 11:57 PM Subject: Re: 3ware 7506, FreeBSD 4.x, Maxtor Disks & SMART Problems. > One of the maxtor disks at the colocation with the 3ware card was failing to > complete it's long tests with read errors. This is inline with Jason's > postings about how maxtor disk errors can cause a total I/O hang. Note, > this is the start of a disk failure, not a total disk failure. > > The bus issues do not affect us at all, or they should not I have a freak > of nature 7450 card which is a 64bit/33 mhz card and no longer available. > The issue only affects 66 mhz and riser card users. > > The bus issues were noted and documented in 3ware's advisories. Depending > on when you purchased your card and if it is running at 66 mhz or not. > > http://www.3ware.com/KB/kb.asp > https://www.3ware.com/kbadmin/attachments/TM900-0045-00%20Rev%20A_P.pdf > > General idea is the older runs of the 3ware card does not handle high speed > timings well which was a big problem with riser cards + 66 mhz combinations. > You can purchase a special riser card from > > www.adexelec.com > > PCITX8-3R > > This riser card was specially designed by Adex to help resolve 3ware's known > issue. Any new 3ware cards should not experience this issue. > > Unfortunately, this issue is not the same as mine, but I hope this > information helps you. (consider purchasing the special PCI riser card with > additional resistors). > > > > - Carroll Kong From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 22 02:56:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6078D16A4CE for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 02:56:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (creme-brulee.marcuscom.com [24.172.16.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 871F843D39 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 02:56:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4]) i8M2uM7f043432; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 22:56:22 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Marcus Clarke To: Matt Herzog In-Reply-To: <20040922020042.GR5586@acheron.in.hades> References: <20040922020042.GR5586@acheron.in.hades> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-bFGw/qY2gTBlx5IOBpuf" Organization: MarcusCom, Inc. Message-Id: <1095821798.45253.41.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 22:56:38 -0400 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on creme-brulee.marcuscom.com cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Firefox fails to build X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 02:56:58 -0000 --=-bFGw/qY2gTBlx5IOBpuf Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2004-09-21 at 22:00, Matt Herzog wrote: > Hello All. >=20 > I'm trying to build Firefox 0.9.3 on 4.10 FreeBSD. I updated ports=20 > before I attempted this build. I am running FreeBSD on a dual P3=20 > system. Any advice would be welcome. This is most likely related to the fact that you're building with debugging enabled. If you set default CFLAGS you should be okay. As to why debugging is causing the threaded functions to fail, I'm not certain. Joe --=20 PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc --=-bFGw/qY2gTBlx5IOBpuf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBUOnmb2iPiv4Uz4cRAloFAJ95AABQt7+GlPibgbWBKPsZAGgxUQCdFnAc yqa42i6AAwqs3VoK11a8jNM= =BnnB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-bFGw/qY2gTBlx5IOBpuf-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 22 05:26:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D85816A4CE for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 05:26:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mandarin.fruitsalad.org (pc117.net160.koping.net [81.16.160.117]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D88B43D2D for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 05:26:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@fruitsalad.org) Received: from [192.168.15.6] (helo=fmd.universe.hasta.se) by mandarin.fruitsalad.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1C9zeM-0009ji-Cr for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 07:26:42 +0200 From: Matt Douhan Organization: fruitsalad.org To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 07:24:30 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <40CD80F1.6020107@mintel.com> <202801c49a0e$f2ca9980$0200a8c0@athena> <023c01c4a04f$0d2dea70$0200a8c0@athena> In-Reply-To: <023c01c4a04f$0d2dea70$0200a8c0@athena> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200409220724.30684.matt@fruitsalad.org> Subject: Re: 3ware 7506, FreeBSD 4.x, Maxtor Disks & SMART Problems. X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 05:26:44 -0000 On Wednesday 22 September 2004 04.51, Carroll Kong wrote: > twe0: <3ware Storage Controller driver ver. 1.40.01.002> port 0xc800-0xc80f > mem 0xfe000000-0xfe7fffff,0xfeaffc00-0xfeaffc0f irq 2 at > device 7.0 on pci1 > twe0: 4 ports, Firmware FE7X 1.05.00.068, BIOS BE7X 1.08.00.048 twe0: <3ware Storage Controller> port 0xd400-0xd40f mem 0xf5000000-0xf57fffff,0xf5800000-0xf580000f irq 10 at device 9.0 on pci0 has never failed me, well disks have failed but always managed to rebuild successfully, and this is the main NFS server for our KDE cluster builds at fruitsalad.org so it takes a good hammering. rgds Matt From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 22 08:22:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF73F16A4CE for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 08:22:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns.klondike.ru (ns.klondike.ru [195.170.237.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BC6443D48 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 08:22:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from odenisov@klondike.ru) Received: from ns.klondike.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns.klondike.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8M8MkTi011827 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:22:46 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from odenisov@klondike.ru) Received: (from root@localhost) by ns.klondike.ru (8.12.10/8.12.3/Submit) id i8M8MfGL011826 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org.KAV; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:22:41 +0400 (MSD) Received: from klondike.ru (denisov [195.170.237.21]) by ns.klondike.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8M8MfTi011818 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:22:41 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from odenisov@klondike.ru) Message-ID: <41513651.8D3FED06@klondike.ru> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 12:22:41 +0400 From: "Oleg S. Denisov" Organization: Klondike X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: make release failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: odenisov@klondike.ru List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 08:22:57 -0000 Hi. I have a problem same as this http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-stable/2003-August/003008.html last week. I try to build 4_STABLE release. Who can tell me what i do wrong? Best regards, Oleg Denisov. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 22 08:32:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8F6C16A4CE for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 08:32:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc12.comcast.net [216.148.227.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A419F43D53 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 08:32:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imbutler@comcast.net) Received: from auburn.comcast.net (h000086489e8c.ne.client2.attbi.com[24.218.150.62]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc12) with ESMTP id <2004092208324401400bmbtqe>; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 08:32:48 +0000 Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by auburn.comcast.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8C5D17048; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 04:32:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from auburn.comcast.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (auburn.comcast.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 64511-04; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 04:32:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from h000086489e8c.ne.client2.attbi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by auburn.comcast.net (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 04:32:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from 216.74.150.194 (SquirrelMail authenticated user imb); by h000086489e8c.ne.client2.attbi.com with HTTP; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 04:32:39 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <24847.216.74.150.194.1095841959.squirrel@216.74.150.194> In-Reply-To: <41513651.8D3FED06@klondike.ru> References: <41513651.8D3FED06@klondike.ru> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 04:32:39 -0400 (EDT) From: "Michael Butler" To: odenisov@klondike.ru User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a X-Mailer: SquirrelMail/1.4.3a MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed;boundary="----=_20040922043239_47634" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: at auburn.comcast.net cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make release failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 08:32:49 -0000 ------=_20040922043239_47634 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 The problem is that the kernel is too big to fit onto the floppy image. I used the attached patch to remove math co-processor emulation and 386 support to make it fit, Michael Butler CISSP Security Consultant Savvis Communications www.savvis.net PGP Key ID: 0x5E873CC5 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBUTimiJykeV6HPMURAhHlAJsFETi9qQKjy7YZcH56rUeWK0eonACgow16 7xVTE571/AZF+IxdJ43V1f4= =RHJ8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------=_20040922043239_47634 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="----=_20040922043239_47634_part_2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 ------=_20040922043239_47634_part_2 Content-Type: application/octet-stream; name="patch-dokern" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="patch-dokern" KioqIHJlbGVhc2UvaTM4Ni9kb2tlcm4uc2h+CUZyaSBBcHIgIDQgMTI6MTA6MzEgMjAwMwotLS0g cmVsZWFzZS9pMzg2L2Rva2Vybi5zaAlUdWUgQXVnIDI2IDE1OjA4OjE2IDIwMDMKKioqKioqKioq KioqKioqCioqKiAzNCwzOSAqKioqCi0tLSAzNCw0MSAtLS0tCiAgCS1lICcvdXJpby9kJyBcCiAg CS1lICcvdXNjYW5uZXIvZCcgXAogIAktZSAnL21heHVzZXJzL2QnIFwKKyAJLWUgJy9NQVRIX0VN VUxBVEUvZCcgXAorIAktZSAnL0kzODZfQ1BVL2QnIFwKICAJLWUgJ3MvaWRlbnQuKkdFTkVSSUMv aWRlbnQJCUJPT1RNRlMvZycKICAKICBlY2hvICJvcHRpb25zICBORVRHUkFQSCIK ------=_20040922043239_47634_part_2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="patch-dokern.sig.asc" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="patch-dokern.sig.asc" LS0tLS1CRUdJTiBQR1AgU0lHTkFUVVJFLS0tLS0KVmVyc2lvbjogR251UEcgdjEuMi42IChGcmVl QlNEKQoKaUQ4REJRQkJVVGluaUp5a2VWNkhQTVVSQXBYb0FLQ2NqOHpJRzNZL2ZmU3BxVjhoZWRL cnZuSlRGd0NnOGxvWgplVW5POGhURTlRNUdvZUY5L0xxU09kWT0KPTg4TmMKLS0tLS1FTkQgUEdQ IFNJR05BVFVSRS0tLS0tCg== ------=_20040922043239_47634_part_2-- ------=_20040922043239_47634-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 22 08:35:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 858F816A4CF for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 08:35:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hawk.miratech.ua (hawk.miratech.ua [195.137.196.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 448AD43D1F for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 08:35:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ADidok@miratech.biz) Received: from mtx-mail.msg (mtx-mail [10.16.3.2]) by hawk.miratech.ua (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8M8ZgAd039352; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:35:42 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ADidok@miratech.biz) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6375.0 Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:35:42 +0300 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: make release failed thread-index: AcSgfYj6TIPTNeSvQGCyjvOhIxNbVwAAWOLg From: "Alexander Didok" To: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=15.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on hawk.miratech.ua X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.75.1, clamav-milter version 0.75c on hawk.miratech.ua X-Virus-Status: Clean cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: make release failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 08:35:48 -0000 >I have a problem same as this >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/htdig/freebsd-stable/2003->August/0030 08.html >last week. >I try to build 4_STABLE release. >Who can tell me what i do wrong? !!!!!!!!!!!! /mnt: write failed, file system is full cpio: write error: No space left on device *** Error code 1 !!!!!!!!!!!! ------------------------ Alexander Didok,=20 Miratech Ltd. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 22 09:38:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C74B16A4CE for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:38:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rocky.mintel.co.uk (rocky2.mintel.com [217.206.187.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 356F643D1D for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:38:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jason.thomson@mintel.com) Received: from [10.0.62.5] ([10.0.62.5]) by rocky.mintel.co.uk (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i8M9cVrI026529; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 10:38:32 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jason.thomson@mintel.com) Message-ID: <41514817.9070805@mintel.com> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 10:38:31 +0100 From: Jason Thomson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Benjamin Lutz References: <20040921155930.GF72513@mail1.thewrittenword.com> <415058FA.1090709@mintel.com> <20040921194221.56268155.benlutz@datacomm.ch> In-Reply-To: <20040921194221.56268155.benlutz@datacomm.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.28 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4-STABLE and 3Ware 9000 series controllers X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:38:36 -0000 The 9.0.2 download on their site is for 4.8 and newer when I invoke it on FreeBSD 4.10-STABLE, it never actually starts listening on a socket. OK - just tried it again, and it started working. (I did install 4.x compat - but I'm not convinced that was the problem). Sorry. So I can confirm that 3dm2 *does* *work* on 4.10-STABLE. Apologies for the FUD. Benjamin Lutz wrote: >>2. We haven't been able to get 3dm2 working on this machine. (But the >>CLI does work). We haven't spent a huge amount of time on it yet - but >>do want to get it working to remotely monitor the array / generate >>alerts. >> >> >>If anyone has got 3dm2 working with FreeBSD 4.x I'd be really interested >>to know. > > > I have it working on a FreeBSD 5.x machine. What exactly doesn't work for > you? If the service is running, but you can't seem to access it with your > webbrowser, make sure you're using https instead of http, and port number > 888. > > Benjamin From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 22 09:44:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FEB716A4CE for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:44:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ns.klondike.ru (ns.klondike.ru [195.170.237.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F16A43D1F for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:44:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from odenisov@klondike.ru) Received: from ns.klondike.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns.klondike.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8M9iITi025787 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:44:18 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from odenisov@klondike.ru) Received: (from root@localhost) by ns.klondike.ru (8.12.10/8.12.3/Submit) id i8M9iD1e025786 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org.KAV; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:44:13 +0400 (MSD) Received: from klondike.ru (denisov [195.170.237.21]) by ns.klondike.ru (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8M9i8Ti025756; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:44:08 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from odenisov@klondike.ru) Message-ID: <41514968.FE846D3E@klondike.ru> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:44:08 +0400 From: "Oleg S. Denisov" Organization: Klondike X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.78 [en] (Windows NT 5.0; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michael Butler References: <41513651.8D3FED06@klondike.ru> <24847.216.74.150.194.1095841959.squirrel@216.74.150.194> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: make release failed X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: odenisov@klondike.ru List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:44:31 -0000 Hi. As i think it`s problem only with a make files (updated via CVSUP). I have the same problem some month earlier, but after my post to this mailing list (without any answers) problem is disappeared after next CVSUP update. Unfortunately, i don`t know what was changed in make files to fix this problem... Regards, Oleg Denisov. Michael Butler wrote: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > The problem is that the kernel is too big to fit onto the floppy image. I > used the attached patch to remove math co-processor emulation and 386 > support to make it fit, > > Michael Butler CISSP > Security Consultant > Savvis Communications > www.savvis.net > PGP Key ID: 0x5E873CC5 > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) > > iD8DBQFBUTimiJykeV6HPMURAhHlAJsFETi9qQKjy7YZcH56rUeWK0eonACgow16 > 7xVTE571/AZF+IxdJ43V1f4= > =RHJ8 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Name: patch-dokern > patch-dokern Type: unspecified type (application/octet-stream) > Encoding: base64 > > Name: patch-dokern.sig.asc > patch-dokern.sig.asc Type: application/pgp-signature > Encoding: base64 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 22 09:47:16 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3285F16A4CF for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:47:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rocky.mintel.co.uk (rocky2.mintel.com [217.206.187.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9756343D46 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:47:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jason.thomson@mintel.com) Received: from [10.0.62.5] ([10.0.62.5]) by rocky.mintel.co.uk (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id i8M9lErI026723 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 10:47:14 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jason.thomson@mintel.com) Message-ID: <41514A22.2010707@mintel.com> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 10:47:14 +0100 From: Jason Thomson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040616 X-Accept-Language: en, en-us MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20040921155930.GF72513@mail1.thewrittenword.com> <415058FA.1090709@mintel.com> <20040922014442.GA97251@mail1.thewrittenword.com> In-Reply-To: <20040922014442.GA97251@mail1.thewrittenword.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.28 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) Subject: Re: 4-STABLE and 3Ware 9000 series controllers X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:47:16 -0000 Albert Chin wrote: > > I went through the software download procedure on their web site and > was able to download 9.0.2-Upgrade.zip. So is it a bad idea to use an > older driver with the firmware from this package? We couldn't complete the install without upgrading the firmware. We ended up booting the half completed install - and then loading the driver from the 9.0.2-Upgrade.zip archive from a floppy at the boot prompt. (This updated the card firmware). Then we rebooted and re-installed from CD with the older 4.10-STABLE drivers. Everything worked perfectly. It would have been neater to load the driver as the CD was booting and then do the install in one go. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 22 11:27:37 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EFE516A4CF for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:27:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from natnoddy.rzone.de (natnoddy.rzone.de [81.169.145.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3ACF43D49 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:27:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from uwe@laverenz.de) Received: from athena.laverenz.de (pD9550F98.dip.t-dialin.net [217.85.15.152]) by post.webmailer.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8MBRZln016444 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:27:35 +0200 (MEST) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by athena.laverenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5C61E0005DE for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:27:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from athena.laverenz.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (athena [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 19403-04-4 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:27:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: from jungle.laverenz.de (jungle.laverenz.de [192.168.100.8]) by athena.laverenz.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61EDEE0008D1 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:27:34 +0200 (CEST) Received: by jungle.laverenz.de (Postfix, from userid 2000) id E0A26800B3C4; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:27:33 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:27:33 +0200 From: Uwe Laverenz To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040922112733.GC12317@laverenz.de> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: private site Sender: uwe@laverenz.de User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at laverenz.de Subject: Re: nss_ldap - working or not, and how to? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 11:27:37 -0000 On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 01:05:44PM -0500, jcaldwell@ymcastlouis.org wrote: > I'm in desperate need of nss_ldap - it's one of the reasons I'm moving > from NetBSD to FreeBSD - and wondering what the current state of it is, > with 5.3BetaX? Also, is there anyone/where that can tell me what steps are It works since 5.1-RELEASE. Have a look at this link: http://www.cultdeadsheep.org/FreeBSD/docs/Quick_and_dirty_FreeBSD_5_x_and_nss_ldap_mini-HOWTO.html cu, Uwe From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 22 13:57:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4E2316A4CE for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:57:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mx1-a.inoc.net (mx1-a.inoc.net [64.246.131.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F26B43D41 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:57:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rblayzor@inoc.net) Received: from [192.168.0.16] (noc-gw0-fe.dc1-alb.inoc.net [64.246.129.30]) by mx1-a.inoc.net (build v4.8.10) with ESMTP id 16499595 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:56:59 -0400 Message-ID: <415184AA.90604@inoc.net> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 09:56:58 -0400 From: Robert Blayzor Organization: Independent Network Operations Consortium, LLC User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Macintosh/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Problem with fclose() returning error (EBADF) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:57:01 -0000 I have a multithreaded application running on FreeBSD 4.9, .10 and -STABLE that I'm having an issue with. The application writes large amounts of small files over an NFS mount and randomly we're seeing fclose() return a failure code, -1 and errorno, EBADF. We have no idea what may be causing the problem. The NFS server appears to be functioning fine, no errors at all, it runs perfectly over tons of other clients. At first we thought maybe that the fd was getting munged somehow, but here is the weird part. If the code is changed to do an fflush() on the fd immediately before we issue an fclose(), fflush NEVER returns an error and always completes successfully. However, completely rnadomly fclose() will return an error condition and errno of EBADF. There are hundreds of gigs and inodes available on the NFS server and writes work fine from all other NFS clients at the time. (this is a six server mail cluster) We've double checked the compile flags and I've gone through all the libc calls I can think of. And I've linked my own debugging into the libc_r close function and it's not showing 'any' closes occuring between the fopen and fclose that fails. We've also checked the flags of the FILE *f, structure, it is still correct so it has not been munged by anything. There are lots of conditions where the error EBADF is returned by the kernel etc... and I suspect one of them is not really a sign of a bad file handle but means something else, but I don't know any way to find what is really occuring and if it is serious or just a faulty return code. Doing a KTRACE on this may be the only option, but the problem is, the application is SO busy and the problem only happens randomly it'd be impossible to find if/when it happens. ie: thousands and thousands of files can be written successfully before we actually see a failed one. Any help or guidance would be greatly apprecaited. TIA -- Robert Blayzor, BOFH INOC, LLC rblayzor@inoc.net PGP: http://www.inoc.net/~dev/ Key fingerprint = 1E02 DABE F989 BC03 3DF5 0E93 8D02 9D0B CB1A A7B0 Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon full of tapes. - Jackson From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 22 15:29:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5542516A4DE for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:29:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from anduin.net (anduin.net [212.12.46.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DEB843D39 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:29:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ltning@anduin.net) Received: from mailnull by anduin.net with dspam-scanned (Exim 4.42 (FreeBSD)) id 1CA915-0006j6-VI for stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 17:26:47 +0200 Received: from mailnull by anduin.net with spamassassin-scanned (Exim 4.42 (FreeBSD)) id 1CA911-0006ix-1I for stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 17:26:47 +0200 Received: from eirik.unicore.no ([213.225.74.166] helo=[10.0.16.10]) by anduin.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42 (FreeBSD)) id 1CA910-0006iu-VA for stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 17:26:43 +0200 Message-ID: <41519A92.3070503@anduin.net> Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 17:30:26 +0200 From: Eirik Oeverby User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7.3 (X11/20040922) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on anduin.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.9 required=7.5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 Subject: Obscure errors in dmsg, system instability X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 15:29:14 -0000 Hi all, for some time I have been experiencing weird hangs on one of my servers. When it happens, I can still ping it, but I cannot make any connections or type anything on existing ssh connections. Serial console is also dead, however I can enter the kernel debugger and call cpu_reset() to reboot. Upon reboot all is fine again. Now I discover that my dmsg output contains a few of these: ahc0: PCI error Interrupt at seqaddr = 0x9 ahc0: Data Parity Error Detected during address or write data phase and ahc0: PCI error Interrupt at seqaddr = 0x8 ahc0: Data Parity Error Detected during address or write data phase Thing is - there's nothing connected to the Adaptec. It is enabled, but not used. Can someone in-the-know tell me what exactly these errors mean, and what they might indicate? Ofcourse this MIGHT be the cause of my problems, but I don't know that for sure, and I'd like to know if there are any other plausible explanations for these errors... I will obviously disable the onboard adaptec at the earliest convenience. This is an ASUS P2B-DS board, dual p3 with onboard u2w scsi. Anyone? Thanks, /Eirik From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 22 22:37:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6697B16A4CE for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 22:37:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from moek.pir.net (moek.pir.net [130.64.1.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0199F43D46 for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 22:37:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pir@pir.net) Received: from pir by moek.pir.net with local (Exim) id 1CAFjp-0001xE-9J for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 18:37:25 -0400 Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 18:37:25 -0400 From: Peter Radcliffe To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040922223725.GA6355@pir.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-fish: < X-Copy-On-Listmail: Please do NOT Cc: me on list mail. Subject: Two usb mice attatching at once X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 22:37:26 -0000 I'm testing an external usb IBM keyboard for use with a laptop, it has a touchpad and a mouse nipple on it. Plgging into my laptop (runnig -stable) gives me ums0 and ums1 but the attatch line in usbd.conf never gets run for ums1, just ums0 so I get no moused. I've confirmed this bu running moused manually, which works fine, and adding a debugging call to logger in usbd.conf, and all I get is; Sep 22 18:33:30 disapp usbd: ums0 So is usbd losing the second mouse attatch because it's already dealt with one device of that type on attatch ? Full usb info; addr 1: full speed, self powered, config 1, UHCI root hub(0x0000), Intel(0x0000), rev 1.00 port 1 addr 2: full speed, power 40 mA, config 1, USB 1.1 2 port downstream low-power hub(0x3016), Lite-On Tech(0x04b3), rev 1.26 port 1 powered port 2 powered port 3 addr 3: low speed, power 70 mA, config 1, IBM USB Travel Keyboard with UltraNav(0x3019), Lite-On Tech(0x04b3), rev 1.16 port 4 addr 4: low speed, power 100 mA, config 1, Composite TouchPad / TrackPoint(0x0009), Synaptics Inc.(0x06cb), rev 0.15 port 2 powered uhub3: Lite-On Tech USB 1.1 2 port downstream low-power hub, class 9/0, rev 1.10/1.26, addr 2 uhub3: 4 ports with 2 removable, bus powered ukbd0: Lite-On Tech IBM USB Travel Keyboard with UltraNav, rev 1.10/1.16, addr 3, iclass 3/1 kbd1 at ukbd0 uhid0: Lite-On Tech IBM USB Travel Keyboard with UltraNav, rev 1.10/1.16, addr 3, iclass 3/0 ums0: Synaptics Inc. Composite TouchPad / TrackPoint, rev 1.10/0.15, addr 4, iclass 3/1 ums0: 3 buttons ums1: Synaptics Inc. Composite TouchPad / TrackPoint, rev 1.10/0.15, addr 4, iclass 3/1 ums1: 3 buttons P. -- pir From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 23 02:14:18 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1161716A4CE for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 02:14:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEC0143D53 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 02:14:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com) Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id DEF3472DD4; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 19:14:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA72972DCB; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 19:14:17 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 19:14:17 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White To: Robert Blayzor In-Reply-To: <415184AA.90604@inoc.net> Message-ID: <20040922191114.F36124@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <415184AA.90604@inoc.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with fclose() returning error (EBADF) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 02:14:18 -0000 On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, Robert Blayzor wrote: > I have a multithreaded application running on FreeBSD 4.9, .10 and > -STABLE that I'm having an issue with. > > The application writes large amounts of small files over an NFS mount > and randomly we're seeing fclose() return a failure code, -1 and > errorno, EBADF. > > We have no idea what may be causing the problem. The NFS server appears > to be functioning fine, no errors at all, it runs perfectly over tons > of other clients. Ethereal is really nice for doing NFS protocol traces. If you can reproduce it and run ethereal (or tcpdump writing to a file) on the the output, and filter down to the transaction stream you're interested in. See if you can make a test app that implmenets the minumum functionality required to reproduce the problem. EBADF sounds more like a program bug, though ... file descriptor getting closed by one thread and not accounting for it, or a race, or data corruption... -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 23 02:14:51 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ED6416A4CE for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 02:14:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [204.156.12.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B91A043D41 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 02:14:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fledge.watson.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i8N2E7SZ050162; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 22:14:08 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Received: from localhost (robert@localhost)i8N2E7J8050159; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 22:14:07 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from robert@fledge.watson.org) Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 22:14:07 -0400 (EDT) From: Robert Watson X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Rumen Telbizov In-Reply-To: <414FE17E.4060404@e-card.bg> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3BETA5 slow network X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 02:14:51 -0000 On Tue, 21 Sep 2004, Rumen Telbizov wrote: > I've been using FreeBSD 5.3 since BETA2 and I have this network > performance problem. My network is very slow. I am on a 100Mbit Lan and > when I download a file over it from the box next to me I achieve speed > of 40KB/s maximum. My previous OS was 4.10 and I did not have this > problem. No hardware change made! > > I read UPDATING and tried to set debug.mpsafenet = 0. Unfortunately it > is readonly and cannot be set. My default value of debug.mpsafenet is > 1! > > Putting it into loader.conf doesn't do the trick either. Nor does > putting "options NET_WITH_GIANT" into the kernel. > > My system is: 5.3-BETA5 FreeBSD 5.3-BETA5 #3: Mon Sep 20 19:00:21 EEST > 2004 > > Any ideas are welcome. Thank you in advance. Could you provide dmesg output and kernel configuration? Robert N M Watson FreeBSD Core Team, TrustedBSD Projects robert@fledge.watson.org Principal Research Scientist, McAfee Research From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 23 02:15:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAB0316A4D0 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 02:15:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB52743D41 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 02:15:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com) Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C25E272DD4; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 19:15:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C125372DCB; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 19:15:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 19:15:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White To: Eirik Oeverby In-Reply-To: <41519A92.3070503@anduin.net> Message-ID: <20040922191436.A36124@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <41519A92.3070503@anduin.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Obscure errors in dmsg, system instability X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 02:15:20 -0000 On Wed, 22 Sep 2004, Eirik Oeverby wrote: > for some time I have been experiencing weird hangs on one of my servers. > When it happens, I can still ping it, but I cannot make any connections > or type anything on existing ssh connections. Serial console is also > dead, however I can enter the kernel debugger and call cpu_reset() to > reboot. Upon reboot all is fine again. > > Now I discover that my dmsg output contains a few of these: > > ahc0: PCI error Interrupt at seqaddr = 0x9 > ahc0: Data Parity Error Detected during address or write data phase > > and > > ahc0: PCI error Interrupt at seqaddr = 0x8 > ahc0: Data Parity Error Detected during address or write data phase > > Thing is - there's nothing connected to the Adaptec. It is enabled, but > not used. Is something sharing an interrupt with that device? PCI bus errors are generally Bad News .. either some device or the mobo is inroducing errors. -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 23 05:35:29 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F14E616A4CE for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 05:35:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from anduin.net (anduin.net [212.12.46.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFD3843D2F for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 05:35:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ltning@anduin.net) Received: from mailnull by anduin.net with dspam-scanned (Exim 4.42 (FreeBSD)) id 1CAME3-000F45-L1 for stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 07:33:03 +0200 Received: from mailnull by anduin.net with spamassassin-scanned (Exim 4.42 (FreeBSD)) id 1CAMDz-000F3f-MW for stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 07:33:03 +0200 Received: from [217.8.136.185] (helo=[192.168.1.10]) by anduin.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42 (FreeBSD)) id 1CAMDz-000F3c-IK; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 07:32:59 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20040922191436.A36124@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <41519A92.3070503@anduin.net> <20040922191436.A36124@carver.gumbysoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <5390CF52-0D22-11D9-862C-000D9335BCEC@anduin.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eirik_=D8verby?= Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 07:35:06 +0200 To: Doug White X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on anduin.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.5 required=7.5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Obscure errors in dmsg, system instability X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 05:35:30 -0000 On 23. Sep 2004, at 04:15, Doug White wrote: > Is something sharing an interrupt with that device? > > PCI bus errors are generally Bad News .. either some device or the > mobo is inroducing errors. Well.. Yes, there is some interrupt sharing. Relevant parts of dmsg: [ltning@carnen] ~$ dmesg | grep "irq 2" IOAPIC #0 intpin 19 -> irq 2 uhci0: port 0xd400-0xd41f irq 2 at device 4.2 on pci0 ahc0: port 0xd000-0xd0ff mem 0xe2000000-0xe2000fff irq 2 at device 6.0 on pci0 amr0: mem 0xe3000000-0xe300ffff irq 2 at device 9.1 on pci0 I don't like the fact that the LSI and the Adaptec are sharing IRQs, given that the LSI is the main system drive controller (which is why I don't use the Adaptec at all - and it cannot be disabled in BIOS I think!)... I should perhaps try to reallocate some of the IRQs, but I don't really have a clue how to do that, since I have no VGA in that box.. Ohwell, I guess I just have to rip it open ;) Any other clues? Thanks, /Eirik From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 23 08:13:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2CF16A4CE for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 08:13:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from msr44.hinet.net (msr44.hinet.net [168.95.4.144]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C210143D2F for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 08:13:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yeskw@ms15.hinet.net) Received: from hiperfect.com (dns.hiperfect.com [211.21.55.252]) by msr44.hinet.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA15863 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:13:16 +0800 (CST) Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:13:16 +0800 (CST) From: Kenwey X-X-Sender: yeskww@hiperfect.com To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: How can I mount 2nd Hard disk (IDE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 08:13:19 -0000 I get a warning message when I boot my FreeBSD 5.1, it shows as follows: Detecting Primary Master ...WDC WD400JB-00ETA0 (40GB, running FreeBSD 5.1) Detecting Primary Slave ... None Detecting Secondary Master .WDC WD400BB-32CXA0 (40GB, /lib can't work well) Detecting Secondary Slave ASUS CD-S520/A SMART Failure Predicted on Primary Master: WDC WD400JB-00ETA0 WARNING: Immediately backup your data and replace your hard disk drive A failure may be imminent. Press F1 to conitnue, DEL to enter SETUP 02/16/2000-VT694X-P4V4X-00 I turn off the machine, and pull it (WDC WD400JB-00ETA0) from master and connect it to slave, then I do the following to backup : # mount -r /dev/ad2s1a /mnt it shows: incorrect super block # disklabel -r ad2 the last line shows "super block 0" do anyone know how can I repair it? is there any way to backup the data from this device? From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 23 09:02:49 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDDEB16A4CE for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:02:49 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pluto.dutchdsl.nl (pluto.dutchdsl.nl [62.221.254.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 890D343D2F for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:02:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norman@webminded.nl) Received: from [10.0.0.13] (dsl-82-199-142-179.dutchweb.nl [82.199.142.179]) by pluto.dutchdsl.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B75340007A for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:02:48 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4152913A.5080408@webminded.nl> Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:02:50 +0200 From: Norman Uittenbogaart|Webminded Organization: Webminded User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20040909120120.30C1016A4D0@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20040909120120.30C1016A4D0@hub.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Postgres downgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:02:50 -0000 I upgraded my postgres without dumping my data and reimport them, so now my database won t start, > [root@cp root]# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/010.pgsql.sh start > pgsqlFATAL: database files are incompatible with server > DETAIL: The data directory was initialized by PostgreSQL version 7.3, which is not compatible with this version 7.4.2. Now how can I downgrade from Postgres 7.4.2 back to Postgres 7.3 without loosing my data ? Would a make install in /usr/ports/databases/postgresql73 be sufficient ? Please help !!! Norman Uittenbogaart From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 23 09:24:35 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0599716A4CE for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:24:35 +0000 (GMT) Received: from poison2.syncrontech.com (adsl-nat.syncrontech.com [213.28.98.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47EBE43D49 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:24:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ari@suutari.iki.fi) Received: from guinness.syncrontech.com (guinness.syncrontech.com [62.71.8.19])i8N9OTPV046814; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:24:30 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ari@suutari.iki.fi) Received: from coffee (coffee.syncrontech.com [62.71.8.37]) i8N9OTYY038124; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:24:29 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from ari@suutari.iki.fi) Message-ID: <00ac01c4a14f$20c869b0$2508473e@sad.syncrontech.com> From: "Ari Suutari" To: "Norman Uittenbogaart|Webminded" , References: <20040909120120.30C1016A4D0@hub.freebsd.org> <4152913A.5080408@webminded.nl> Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:24:29 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Subject: Re: Postgres downgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:24:35 -0000 Hi, >> DETAIL: The data directory was initialized by PostgreSQL version 7.3, >> which is not compatible with this version 7.4.2. > > Now how can I downgrade from Postgres 7.4.2 back to Postgres 7.3 without > loosing my data ? > Would a make install in /usr/ports/databases/postgresql73 be sufficient ? I would try that (after deinstalling 7.4 first). Maybe it would be a good idea to copy the contents of /usr/local/pgsql/data directory to someplace safe, just in case something goes wrong. Ari S. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 23 09:48:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DC5F16A4CE for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:48:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pluto.dutchdsl.nl (pluto.dutchdsl.nl [62.221.254.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 207B243D49 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:48:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norman@webminded.nl) Received: from [10.0.0.13] (dsl-82-199-142-179.dutchweb.nl [82.199.142.179]) by pluto.dutchdsl.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AFEB400079 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:48:12 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <41529BDF.6030003@webminded.nl> Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:48:15 +0200 From: Norman Uittenbogaart User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20040909120120.30C1016A4D0@hub.freebsd.org> <4152913A.5080408@webminded.nl> <00ac01c4a14f$20c869b0$2508473e@sad.syncrontech.com> In-Reply-To: <00ac01c4a14f$20c869b0$2508473e@sad.syncrontech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Postgres downgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:48:13 -0000 Would I not lose all my settings / users when deinstalling ? Norman Uittenbogaart Ari Suutari wrote, On 23-9-2004 11:24: > Hi, > >>> DETAIL: The data directory was initialized by PostgreSQL version 7.3, >>> which is not compatible with this version 7.4.2. >> >> >> Now how can I downgrade from Postgres 7.4.2 back to Postgres 7.3 >> without loosing my data ? >> Would a make install in /usr/ports/databases/postgresql73 be sufficient ? > > > I would try that (after deinstalling 7.4 first). Maybe it would be a > good idea > to copy the contents of /usr/local/pgsql/data directory to someplace > safe, just > in case something goes wrong. > > Ari S. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 23 11:16:08 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 037FB16A4CE for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:16:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ramstind.gtf.ol.no (ramstind.gtf.ol.no [128.39.174.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5672143D62 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:16:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from trond@ramstind.gtf.ol.no) Received: from ramstind.gtf.ol.no (Ximalas@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ramstind.gtf.ol.no (8.12.9/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8NBG429018319; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:16:05 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from trond@ramstind.gtf.ol.no) Received: from localhost (trond@localhost)i8NBG1fO018316; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:16:02 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:16:01 +0200 (CEST) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Trond_Endrest=F8l?= To: Norman Uittenbogaart In-Reply-To: <41529BDF.6030003@webminded.nl> Message-ID: <20040923131339.R17938@ramstind.gtf.ol.no> References: <20040909120120.30C1016A4D0@hub.freebsd.org> <4152913A.5080408@webminded.nl><41529BDF.6030003@webminded.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Postgres downgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:16:08 -0000 On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:48+0200, Norman Uittenbogaart wrote: > Would I not lose all my settings / users when deinstalling ? Assuming you are able to use the old pg_dumpall to get hold of everything in your database cluster(s), you should retain everything when you restore the database cluster(s). Wish you best of luck! -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Trond Endrestøl | trond@ramstind.gtf.ol.no Patron of The Art of Computer Programming| FreeBSD 4.8-S & Pine 4.55 From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 23 12:07:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2B7D16A4CE for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:07:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from plab.ku.dk (plab.ku.dk [130.225.107.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6496443D3F for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:07:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tolid@plab.ku.dk) Received: from plab.ku.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by plab.ku.dk (Postfix) with SMTP id DCEF7548DC for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 14:07:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [130.225.107.63] (eagle.plab.ku.dk [130.225.107.63]) by plab.ku.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43E2C548DB for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 14:07:11 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4152BC70.7080608@plab.ku.dk> Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 14:07:12 +0200 From: Anatoliy Dmytriyev User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: maximum size of ufs file system X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:07:13 -0000 Hello, everybody! Do you know somebody maximum size of ufs file system? (not ufs-2). 1 or 2 TB? I'm sorry but I did not find answer in man pages and handbook. Regards, Anatoliy Dmytriyev -- Anatoliy Dmytriyev From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 23 12:15:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61D9416A4CE for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:15:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.datapro.co.za (mail.uskonet.com [196.3.164.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E06443D55 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:15:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from etiennel@datapro.co.za) Received: from NiNJA.datapro.co.za (ninja.datapro.co.za [196.35.242.87]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.datapro.co.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28CCF39D2A; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 14:04:34 +0200 (SAST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by NiNJA.datapro.co.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EAE6B1418; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 14:14:01 +0200 (SAST) From: Etienne Ledoux To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 14:14:01 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <4152BC70.7080608@plab.ku.dk> In-Reply-To: <4152BC70.7080608@plab.ku.dk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200409231414.01462.etiennel@datapro.co.za> Subject: Re: maximum size of ufs file system X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: etiennel@datapro.co.za List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:15:53 -0000 A UFS file system can be as large as 1 Tbyte (terabyte) and can have regular files up to 2 Gbytes On Thursday 23 September 2004 14:07, Anatoliy Dmytriyev wrote: > Hello, everybody! > > Do you know somebody maximum size of ufs file system? (not ufs-2). > 1 or 2 TB? > I'm sorry but I did not find answer in man pages and handbook. > > Regards, > Anatoliy Dmytriyev From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 23 12:21:40 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA14716A4CE for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:21:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from vision-bsd.nl (kf-sdm-cb01-0002.dial.kabelfoon.nl [62.45.26.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E81C743D1D for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:21:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sam@vision-bsd.nl) Received: (qmail 63351 invoked by uid 1018); 23 Sep 2004 12:21:38 -0000 Received: from sam@vision-bsd.nl by freebsd.sam.intern by uid 1016 with qmail-scanner-1.22-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.75. spamassassin: 2.64. Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.538947 secs); 23 Sep 2004 12:21:38 -0000 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: sam@vision-bsd.nl via freebsd.sam.intern X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.22-st-qms (Clear:RC:1(127.0.0.1):. Processed in 0.538947 secs Process 63346) Received: from localhost (HELO www.vision-bsd.nl) (127.0.0.1) by vision-bsd.nl with SMTP; 23 Sep 2004 12:21:37 -0000 Received: from maquis.kabelfoon.nl ([62.45.52.90]) (SquirrelMail authenticated user sam@vision-bsd.nl); by www.vision-bsd.nl with HTTP; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 14:21:37 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <1112.62.45.52.90.1095942097.squirrel@62.45.52.90> In-Reply-To: <200409231414.01462.etiennel@datapro.co.za> References: <4152BC70.7080608@plab.ku.dk> <200409231414.01462.etiennel@datapro.co.za> Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 14:21:37 +0200 (CEST) From: "Samuel Trommel" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 Importance: Normal Subject: Re: maximum size of ufs file system X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:21:41 -0000 Is there a way to by pass this 2GB hard limit?? Just nice to know :-) Sam > > A UFS file system can be as large as 1 Tbyte (terabyte) and can have > regular > files up to 2 Gbytes > > On Thursday 23 September 2004 14:07, Anatoliy Dmytriyev wrote: >> Hello, everybody! >> >> Do you know somebody maximum size of ufs file system? (not ufs-2). >> 1 or 2 TB? >> I'm sorry but I did not find answer in man pages and handbook. >> >> Regards, >> Anatoliy Dmytriyev > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 23 12:34:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 953B016A4CE for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:34:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DB4143D41 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:34:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8NCY8Kp018538; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 22:04:16 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 22:04:02 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <4152BC70.7080608@plab.ku.dk> <200409231414.01462.etiennel@datapro.co.za> <1112.62.45.52.90.1095942097.squirrel@62.45.52.90> In-Reply-To: <1112.62.45.52.90.1095942097.squirrel@62.45.52.90> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1247929.xiG8GyJXBU"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200409232204.03040.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -1.7 () IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.16 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) cc: Samuel Trommel Subject: Re: maximum size of ufs file system X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:34:20 -0000 --nextPart1247929.xiG8GyJXBU Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 21:51, Samuel Trommel wrote: > Is there a way to by pass this 2GB hard limit?? I'm almost certain you have have files bigger than 2Gb.. I have a firewire disk with someone's wedding video on it which has several= =20 multiple gigabyte (17Gb) files on it. I don't have it to hand so I could be smoking drugs but I'm pretty sure I'm= =20 straight :) =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart1247929.xiG8GyJXBU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBUsK75ZPcIHs/zowRAgkdAJ9bQCUqKSiPInEMlLEY41RjJU19fgCfXW59 1j3uyqx/EZ8Wt5ZmlYXNIk8= =pMLm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1247929.xiG8GyJXBU-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 23 13:00:42 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EC2A16A4D0 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:00:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from ipop2.tm.net.my (service.tm.net.my [202.188.0.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3771F43D3F for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:00:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beastie@streamyx.com) Received: from av4.secure.tmnet ([172.20.0.21]) by ipop2.tm.net.my (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003)) with ESMTP id <0I4H00E97W3XT4@ipop2.tm.net.my> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 20:59:57 +0800 (SGT) Received: from p4 ([219.95.90.197]) by av4.tm.net.my (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 (built Feb 21 2002)) with ESMTP id <0I4H003JAW3OIT@av4.tm.net.my> for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 20:59:57 +0800 (SGT) Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 20:59:55 +0800 From: Desmond Phoon In-reply-to: <200409231414.01462.etiennel@datapro.co.za> To: etiennel@datapro.co.za Message-id: <001401c4a16d$3c0c6910$6500a8c0@p4> MIME-version: 1.0 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-priority: Normal cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: RE: maximum size of ufs file system X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:00:42 -0000 I do not agreed that regular file size limit only up to 2Gb, I tried once written a program to write to a file, which able to exceed 6Gb (of course I stop it after that). And I have checked struct stat in the include file /usr/include/sys/stat.h and it shows the filesize is off_t (which is int64) in current implementation, so I assume it is 2^63 size. Please correct me if I'm wrong b'cos I would like to know this too. Regards, -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Etienne Ledoux Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 8:14 PM To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: maximum size of ufs file system A UFS file system can be as large as 1 Tbyte (terabyte) and can have regular files up to 2 Gbytes On Thursday 23 September 2004 14:07, Anatoliy Dmytriyev wrote: > Hello, everybody! > > Do you know somebody maximum size of ufs file system? (not ufs-2). > 1 or 2 TB? > I'm sorry but I did not find answer in man pages and handbook. > > Regards, > Anatoliy Dmytriyev _______________________________________________ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 23 13:02:44 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72FB816A4CE for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:02:44 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hotmail.com (bay2-f40.bay2.hotmail.com [65.54.247.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E88A43D31 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:02:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tjena22@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 06:01:02 -0700 Received: from 194.103.228.50 by by2fd.bay2.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:00:45 GMT X-Originating-IP: [194.103.228.50] X-Originating-Email: [tjena22@hotmail.com] X-Sender: tjena22@hotmail.com From: "Sebastian Holmqvist" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:00:45 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Sep 2004 13:01:02.0310 (UTC) FILETIME=[60F08860:01C4A16D] Subject: Re: maximum size of ufs file system X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:02:44 -0000 I had about 100 GB with files all over 4 GB. Wasn't FAT32 the latest filesystem which had a filesizelimit? That was on 2 GB. Note. Might be repeating somebody, since I just read Daniels post. //Sebastian Holmqvist >From: "Daniel O'Connor" >To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org >CC: Samuel Trommel >Subject: Re: maximum size of ufs file system >Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 22:04:02 +0930 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: from mx2.freebsd.org ([216.136.204.119]) by mc1-f42.hotmail.com >with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 23 Sep 2004 05:34:32 -0700 >Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.freebsd.org [216.136.204.18])by >mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPid 1E5325800C; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 >12:34:27 +0000 (GMT)(envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org) >Received: from hub.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])by hub.freebsd.org >(Postfix) with ESMTPid DBDCD16A4D1; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:34:25 +0000 (GMT) >Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])by >hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 953B016A4CEfor >;Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:34:20 +0000 (GMT) >Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10])by >mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DB4143D41for >;Thu, 23 Sep 2004 12:34:19 +0000 >(GMT)(envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) >Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1])(authenticated >bits=0)by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id >i8NCY8Kp018538;Thu, 23 Sep 2004 22:04:16 +0930 (CST)(envelope-from >doconnor@gsoft.com.au) >X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jETGZxgpwfUhAd2V6wKx0Th >Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org >User-Agent: KMail/1.7 >References: ><4152BC70.7080608@plab.ku.dk><200409231414.01462.etiennel@datapro.co.za><1112.62.45.52.90.1095942097.squirrel@62.45.52.90> >In-Reply-To: <1112.62.45.52.90.1095942097.squirrel@62.45.52.90> >Message-Id: <200409232204.03040.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> >X-Spam-Score: -1.7 >()IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT >X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.16 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) >X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org >X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 >Precedence: list >List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source >code >List-Unsubscribe: >, >List-Archive: >List-Post: >List-Help: >List-Subscribe: >, >Errors-To: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org >Return-Path: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Sep 2004 12:34:32.0817 (UTC) >FILETIME=[AD872610:01C4A169] > >On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 21:51, Samuel Trommel wrote: > > Is there a way to by pass this 2GB hard limit?? > >I'm almost certain you have have files bigger than 2Gb.. > >I have a firewire disk with someone's wedding video on it which has several >multiple gigabyte (17Gb) files on it. > >I don't have it to hand so I could be smoking drugs but I'm pretty sure I'm >straight :) > >-- >Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer >for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au >"The nice thing about standards is that there >are so many of them to choose from." > -- Andrew Tanenbaum >GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C ><< attach3 >> _________________________________________________________________ Auktioner: Tjäna en hacka på gamla prylar http://tradera.msn.se From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 23 13:06:00 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA4FE16A4CE for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:06:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.datapro.co.za (mail.uskonet.com [196.3.164.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C31D443D31 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:05:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from etienne@unix.za.org) Received: from NiNJA.datapro.co.za (ninja.datapro.co.za [196.35.242.87]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.datapro.co.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id E91CB39E94; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 14:54:43 +0200 (SAST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by NiNJA.datapro.co.za (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79A8AB73C9; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:04:09 +0200 (SAST) From: Etienne Ledoux To: Desmond Phoon Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:04:09 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <001401c4a16d$3c0c6910$6500a8c0@p4> In-Reply-To: <001401c4a16d$3c0c6910$6500a8c0@p4> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200409231504.09376.etienne@unix.za.org> cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: maximum size of ufs file system X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: etienne@unix.za.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:06:01 -0000 you might be right. I just did a quick search on google about ufs filesystem and copy/pasted my answer from some SUN documentation on ufs. On Thursday 23 September 2004 14:59, Desmond Phoon wrote: > I do not agreed that regular file size limit only up to 2Gb, I tried once > written a program to write to a file, which able to exceed 6Gb (of course I > stop it after that). > > And I have checked struct stat in the include file /usr/include/sys/stat.h > and it shows the filesize is off_t (which is int64) in current > implementation, so I assume it is 2^63 size. > > Please correct me if I'm wrong b'cos I would like to know this too. > > Regards, > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Etienne Ledoux > Sent: Thursday, September 23, 2004 8:14 PM > To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: maximum size of ufs file system > > > A UFS file system can be as large as 1 Tbyte (terabyte) and can have > regular > > files up to 2 Gbytes > > On Thursday 23 September 2004 14:07, Anatoliy Dmytriyev wrote: > > Hello, everybody! > > > > Do you know somebody maximum size of ufs file system? (not ufs-2). > > 1 or 2 TB? > > I'm sorry but I did not find answer in man pages and handbook. > > > > Regards, > > Anatoliy Dmytriyev > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 23 14:54:38 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E03A16A4CE for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 14:54:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail4.speakeasy.net (mail4.speakeasy.net [216.254.0.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 249E443D1F for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 14:54:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-stable-local@be-well.no-ip.com) Received: (qmail 1699 invoked from network); 23 Sep 2004 14:54:37 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.no-ip.com) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail4.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 23 Sep 2004 14:54:37 -0000 Received: by be-well.no-ip.com (Postfix, from userid 1147) id DBB01E; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:54:36 -0400 (EDT) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Anatoliy Dmytriyev References: <4152BC70.7080608@plab.ku.dk> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 23 Sep 2004 10:54:36 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4152BC70.7080608@plab.ku.dk> Message-ID: <448yb1ox1v.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 7 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii cc: freebsd-stable Subject: Re: maximum size of ufs file system X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 14:54:38 -0000 Anatoliy Dmytriyev writes: > Do you know somebody maximum size of ufs file system? (not ufs-2). > 1 or 2 TB? > I'm sorry but I did not find answer in man pages and handbook. http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/install.html#FFS-LIMITS From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 23 15:00:48 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD90716A4CE for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:00:48 +0000 (GMT) Received: from yearning.mcc.ac.uk (yearning.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.203.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFF9F43D45 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:00:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org) Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97]) by yearning.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1CAV5S-00016L-00 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:00:47 +0100 Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i8NF0cYu082436 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:00:46 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org) Received: (from jcm@localhost) by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (8.12.10/8.12.6/Submit) id i8NF0cwD082433 for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:00:38 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:00:37 +0100 From: Jonathon McKitrick To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040923150037.GB82032@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Subject: How to mount extra partitions from a fixit disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:00:48 -0000 Here's my scenario: I'm running 4.10 on a laptop, and the drive is in the process of dying. It won't boot, but from the fixit disk I am able to access the root directory. Root is assigned to ad0s1a, which the fixit disk has in the /dev directory. However, /usr is on ad0s1g. There is no entry for this device in /dev, and no MAKEDEV script either. How can I mount this device/partition to access /usr? Also, I'm trying to decide how to get the data off the laptop. I have a wi card and a parallel port zip drive. Which would be easier to get working? Can I simply copy the modules from another 4.10 box and then break into the boot cycle and load them there? jm -- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 23 15:06:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 321F816A4CE for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:06:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from acidy.com (iade006wl01.blackmesh.com [216.66.28.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 96EA543D2F for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:06:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@acidy.com) Received: (qmail 2358 invoked by uid 512); 23 Sep 2004 15:06:34 -0000 Received: from steve@acidy.com by terrence by uid 510 with qmail-scanner-1.21st (clamdscan: 0.70rc. spamassassin: 2.63. Clear:RC:1(212.44.26.32):. Processed in 0.985531 secs); 23 Sep 2004 15:06:34 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO apollo.howes-macnaghten.com) (212.44.26.32) by acidy.com with SMTP; 23 Sep 2004 15:06:33 -0000 Received: from steve ([192.168.42.70]) by apollo.howes-macnaghten.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:06:33 +0100 From: "Steve Hodgson" To: "'Jonathon McKitrick'" , Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:06:33 +0100 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 In-Reply-To: <20040923150037.GB82032@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Sep 2004 15:06:33.0290 (UTC) FILETIME=[E9C0E2A0:01C4A17E] Subject: RE: How to mount extra partitions from a fixit disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:06:36 -0000 owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org wrote: > Here's my scenario: I'm running 4.10 on a laptop, and the > drive is in the process of dying. It won't boot, but from > the fixit disk I am able to access the root directory. Root > is assigned to ad0s1a, which the fixit disk has in the /dev > directory. However, /usr is on ad0s1g. There is no entry > for this device in /dev, and no MAKEDEV script either. How > can I mount this device/partition to access /usr? >=20 > Also, I'm trying to decide how to get the data off the > laptop. I have a wi card and a parallel port zip drive. > Which would be easier to get working? Can I simply copy the > modules from another 4.10 box and then break into the boot cycle and > load them there?=20 >=20 > jm How about downloading FreeSBIE on another computer, burning it to an ISO = and using that? I've never used the fixit CD but FreeSBIE is based on 5.2.1 = and may have better luck. maybe. On the same vain you could try knoppix, though I'm not sure that the = Linux kernel is compiled with support for UFS. A completely different code = base may have some luck disentangling your dying drive. Steve From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 23 15:39:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7542A16A4CE for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:39:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from hotmail.com (bay2-f6.bay2.hotmail.com [65.54.247.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 580EB43D5C for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:39:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tjena22@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 08:39:04 -0700 Received: from 217.210.227.30 by by2fd.bay2.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:38:35 GMT X-Originating-IP: [217.210.227.30] X-Originating-Email: [tjena22@hotmail.com] X-Sender: tjena22@hotmail.com From: "Sebastian Holmqvist" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 17:38:35 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Sep 2004 15:39:04.0890 (UTC) FILETIME=[74FF69A0:01C4A183] Subject: RE: How to mount extra partitions from a fixit disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:39:21 -0000 Can't you just pick it out and use an adapter with another computer? >From: Jonathon McKitrick >To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org >Subject: How to mount extra partitions from a fixit disk >Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:00:37 +0100 >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Received: from mx2.freebsd.org ([216.136.204.119]) by mc2-f22.hotmail.com >with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 23 Sep 2004 08:01:18 -0700 >Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.freebsd.org [216.136.204.18])by >mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPid 67E5D5B80C; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 >15:00:56 +0000 (GMT)(envelope-from owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org) >Received: from hub.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])by hub.freebsd.org >(Postfix) with ESMTPid CA46C16A4DF; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:00:54 +0000 (GMT) >Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])by >hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD90716A4CEfor >;Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:00:48 +0000 (GMT) >Received: from yearning.mcc.ac.uk (yearning.mcc.ac.uk [130.88.203.23])by >mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFF9F43D45for >;Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:00:47 +0000 >(GMT)(envelope-from jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org) >Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org ([130.88.200.97])by >yearning.mcc.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.12)id 1CAV5S-00016L-00for >freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:00:47 +0100 >Received: from dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org (localhost >[127.0.0.1])i8NF0cYu082436 for ;Thu, 23 Sep >2004 16:00:46 +0100 (BST)(envelope-from jcm@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org) >Received: (from jcm@localhost)by dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org >(8.12.10/8.12.6/Submit) id i8NF0cwD082433for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; >Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:00:38 +0100 (BST) >X-Message-Info: JGTYoYF78jFtet3bsUtsDd1jPWQaLQsN >Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org >Message-ID: <20040923150037.GB82032@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> >User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i >X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org >X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 >Precedence: list >List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source >code >List-Unsubscribe: >, >List-Archive: >List-Post: >List-Help: >List-Subscribe: >, >Errors-To: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org >Return-Path: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org >X-OriginalArrivalTime: 23 Sep 2004 15:01:18.0395 (UTC) >FILETIME=[2E0FB8B0:01C4A17E] > > >Here's my scenario: I'm running 4.10 on a laptop, and the drive is in the >process of dying. It won't boot, but from the fixit disk I am able to >access the root directory. Root is assigned to ad0s1a, which the fixit >disk >has in the /dev directory. However, /usr is on ad0s1g. There is no entry >for this device in /dev, and no MAKEDEV script either. How can I mount >this >device/partition to access /usr? > >Also, I'm trying to decide how to get the data off the laptop. I have a wi >card and a parallel port zip drive. Which would be easier to get working? >Can I simply copy the modules from another 4.10 box and then break into the >boot cycle and load them there? > >jm >-- >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" _________________________________________________________________ Hitta rätt på nätet med MSN Sök http://search.msn.se/ From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 23 15:54:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A58EB16A4CE; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:54:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b.mail.sonic.net (b.mail.sonic.net [64.142.19.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 822CF43D54; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:54:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bmah@freebsd.org) Received: from tomcat.kitchenlab.org (adsl-64-142-31-107.sonic.net [64.142.31.107]) by b.mail.sonic.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8NFsJMp017151 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Thu, 23 Sep 2004 08:54:20 -0700 Received: from tomcat.kitchenlab.org (localhost.kitchenlab.org [127.0.0.1]) by tomcat.kitchenlab.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id i8NFsJFv054850; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 08:54:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah@freebsd.org) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by tomcat.kitchenlab.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id i8NFsJu0054849; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 08:54:19 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: tomcat.kitchenlab.org: bmah set sender to bmah@freebsd.org using -f Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 08:54:19 -0700 From: "Bruce A. Mah" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040923155419.GB53845@tomcat.kitchenlab.org> References: <20040920211231.89904.qmail@web53808.mail.yahoo.com> <200409201753.38308.so14k@so14k.com> <414F9C6D.9020709@corp.grupos.com.br> <20040921041017.GA963@tomcat.kitchenlab.org> <127205680265.20040920222835@takeda.tk> <20040921154116.GB36705@tomcat.kitchenlab.org> <12247499375.20040921100534@takeda.tk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="V0207lvV8h4k8FAm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <12247499375.20040921100534@takeda.tk> X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i cc: "Bruce A. Mah" Subject: Re: upgrade questions 4.10 -> 5-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:54:20 -0000 --V0207lvV8h4k8FAm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable If memory serves me right, Dariusz Kulinski wrote: > Tuesday, September 21, 2004, 8:41:16 AM, you wrote: >=20 > >> It's nice guide, but I personally think there few important thing stat > >> are missing (and I was trying to found answer, but without luck): > >> - what directories, should be especially backed up and restored after > >> upgrade, I know /etc /usr/local/etc, /var/mail /var/cron /var/db > >> what else? > > For the case of a reinstalling from installation media, what to > > restore depends on how you've configured your system. It's beyond the > > scope of the document to try to enumerate all possible directories > > that might be holding data you care about. At a bare minimum, things > > I usually care about on my systems can be found in /boot, /etc, > > /usr/local/etc, /var, and whereever home directories live. Beyond > > that, it depends too much on how your own system is set up. That's > > why you want to make sure you've saved *everything* to backup media, > > so if you miss restoring something you can always go back and get it > > later. >=20 > What about directories that I definitively shouldn't restore, for > example: > /usr/include /usr/lib most likely /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin /stand > and so on, maybe that could help me better. Here's the deal. For any of the systems I maintain, I wouldn't restore any of these from backups after a source upgrade because in general, those directories contain *only* files installed from the base system. But how can I tell how *you* have *your* system set up? > >> - how to upgrade config files while while doing source upgrade, is it > >> possible to use mergemaster, what are recommended steps? > >> Overwrite all the new files and run mergemaster or there is better > >> way? > > Step 16 of the source upgrade procedure says specifically to use > > "mergemaster -i". >=20 > That step was in source upgrade category, so I assumed it might not > be correct for binary upgrade. You *asked* about the source upgrade procedure above. For binary upgrades, it's probably best to carefully examine the files in your backups and merge the changes in by hand. After a binary install, the old files will be gone, so there won't be anything for mergemaster to operate on. Good candidates for merging are: /etc/passwd, /etc/group, and /etc/rc.conf. Don't just blindly drop in your backup files. > >> - some other stuff that I just forgot >=20 > > Sorry, can't help you with that part. >=20 > What about ports, I know that I need to recompile them, but will they > work for that time? We believe that most ports will work if you install the compat4x libraries and don't upgrade anything. But there's a few that *need* to be upgraded, due to changes in the statfs structure. Also if you're going to upgrade ports in the future, it's probably safest to reinstall all ports. > >> Basically I would like make the migration flawlessly, and in shortest > >> time possible. > > In my experience, sometimes those two goals are at odds with each > > other. > > You didn't say anything about the machine(s) you're trying to upgrade, > > but if any of them happen to be providing mission-critical services, I > > highly recommend running through the upgrade process on a scratch > > machine first. Or even better, build up a new system and gradually > > migrate data and services over to it. >=20 > It's not really mission-critical, but it's like that for me :) > It works as my mail/web server so I want to have shortest downtime > possible :) Then you want to take your time and do things carefully so that you don't have a longer downtime caused by screwing up the upgrade. I've had this happen more times than I can count (not on FreeBSD, but the experience applies). Bruce. --V0207lvV8h4k8FAm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBUvGr2MoxcVugUsMRAnsiAKDRM+p3JK1r53rK5kWpZFZnwvuYYQCfdFjS R2o+8l6VgqoPX+v6qRJWx+k= =JWYV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --V0207lvV8h4k8FAm-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 23 17:31:54 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90FB416A4CE; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 17:31:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freebsd.takeda.tk (node-402413e2.sna.onnet.us.uu.net [64.36.19.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8718943D49; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 17:31:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from takeda@takeda.tk) Received: from takeda.lan (takeda.lan [10.0.0.3]) by freebsd.takeda.tk (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8NHVnDs085093; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:31:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from takeda@takeda.tk) Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:30:59 -0700 From: Dariusz Kulinski X-Mailer: The Bat! (v2.01) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <56421822718.20040923103059@takeda.tk> To: "Bruce A. Mah" In-Reply-To: <20040923155419.GB53845@tomcat.kitchenlab.org> References: <20040920211231.89904.qmail@web53808.mail.yahoo.com> <200409201753.38308.so14k@so14k.com> <414F9C6D.9020709@corp.grupos.com.br> <20040921041017.GA963@tomcat.kitchenlab.org> <127205680265.20040920222835@takeda.tk> <20040921154116.GB36705@tomcat.kitchenlab.org> <12247499375.20040921100534@takeda.tk> <20040923155419.GB53845@tomcat.kitchenlab.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: upgrade questions 4.10 -> 5-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 17:31:54 -0000 Hello Bruce, Thursday, September 23, 2004, 8:54:19 AM, you wrote: >> What about directories that I definitively shouldn't restore, for >> example: >> /usr/include /usr/lib most likely /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin /stand >> and so on, maybe that could help me better. > Here's the deal. For any of the systems I maintain, I wouldn't > restore any of these from backups after a source upgrade because in > general, those directories contain *only* files installed from the > base system. But how can I tell how *you* have *your* system set up? Well, I'm avoiding to change anything in system files, and all additional stuff I'm actually putting in /usr/local. I'm interested about directories that are changed by system/system programs - I belive most confusing is /var in theory there shouldn't be anything important there (well except logs), but I already noticed there is mail, crontab jobs, informations what ports were installed even mysql port install database there. >> That step was in source upgrade category, so I assumed it might not >> be correct for binary upgrade. > You *asked* about the source upgrade procedure above. I'm sorry, I see now. I wrote one thing but I was thinking about another. I meant binary upgrade, sorry for the confusion. > For binary upgrades, it's probably best to carefully examine the files > in your backups and merge the changes in by hand. After a binary > install, the old files will be gone, so there won't be anything for > mergemaster to operate on. Yes that's true, but using mergemaster is less work. And I still have old files in backup. > Good candidates for merging are: /etc/passwd, /etc/group, and > /etc/rc.conf. Don't just blindly drop in your backup files. So I see next step - selecting which files from /etc are needed to be restored. >> What about ports, I know that I need to recompile them, but will they >> work for that time? > We believe that most ports will work if you install the compat4x > libraries and don't upgrade anything. But there's a few that *need* > to be upgraded, due to changes in the statfs structure. Also if > you're going to upgrade ports in the future, it's probably safest to > reinstall all ports. I see >> It's not really mission-critical, but it's like that for me :) >> It works as my mail/web server so I want to have shortest downtime >> possible :) > Then you want to take your time and do things carefully so that you > don't have a longer downtime caused by screwing up the upgrade. I've > had this happen more times than I can count (not on FreeBSD, but the > experience applies). Thank you very much for your tips on upgrading. -- Best regards, Dariusz mailto:takeda@takeda.tk CCNA, SCSA, SCNA, LPIC, MCP certified http://www.takeda.tk From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 23 18:21:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A94616A4CE for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 18:21:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3357543D46 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 18:21:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i8NIO2MK025689; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:24:02 -0700 Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0/Submit) id i8NIO08m025679; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:24:00 -0700 Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:24:00 -0700 From: Brooks Davis To: Etienne Ledoux Message-ID: <20040923182400.GD25699@odin.ac.hmc.edu> References: <001401c4a16d$3c0c6910$6500a8c0@p4> <200409231504.09376.etienne@unix.za.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VV4b6MQE+OnNyhkM" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200409231504.09376.etienne@unix.za.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on odin.ac.hmc.edu cc: Desmond Phoon cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: maximum size of ufs file system X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 18:21:23 -0000 --VV4b6MQE+OnNyhkM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 03:04:09PM +0200, Etienne Ledoux wrote: > you might be right. I just did a quick search on google about ufs filesys= tem=20 > and copy/pasted my answer from some SUN documentation on ufs. The problem is that SysV didn't bump off_t to 64-bit. That limits you to 2GB files. BSD bit the bullet and fixed that problem long ago. IIRC the limits of UFS1 are 1TB per file system with 512k blocks (2^31 * 512k) due to use of a signed value in some places. The file system limit should be close to 1TB. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --VV4b6MQE+OnNyhkM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBUxS/XY6L6fI4GtQRAshDAJ9hoTxBPiNe68PnUIcdYJEFcr9ZFwCfYHKC 200Z3MLy2b4tRJAQ+yVsy8M= =Km+M -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VV4b6MQE+OnNyhkM-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 23 18:37:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 327A516A4CE; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 18:37:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (Odin.AC.HMC.Edu [134.173.32.75]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBB6543D55; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 18:37:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brdavis@odin.ac.hmc.edu) Received: from odin.ac.hmc.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id i8NIebpp028721; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:40:37 -0700 Received: (from brdavis@localhost) by odin.ac.hmc.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0/Submit) id i8NIeb1Q028720; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:40:37 -0700 Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:40:37 -0700 From: Brooks Davis To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040923184037.GE25699@odin.ac.hmc.edu> References: <20040920211231.89904.qmail@web53808.mail.yahoo.com> <200409201753.38308.so14k@so14k.com> <414F9C6D.9020709@corp.grupos.com.br> <20040921041017.GA963@tomcat.kitchenlab.org> <127205680265.20040920222835@takeda.tk> <20040921154116.GB36705@tomcat.kitchenlab.org> <12247499375.20040921100534@takeda.tk> <20040923155419.GB53845@tomcat.kitchenlab.org> <56421822718.20040923103059@takeda.tk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EgVrEAR5UttbsTXg" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56421822718.20040923103059@takeda.tk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=8.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on odin.ac.hmc.edu cc: "Bruce A. Mah" Subject: Re: upgrade questions 4.10 -> 5-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 18:37:58 -0000 --EgVrEAR5UttbsTXg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 10:30:59AM -0700, Dariusz Kulinski wrote: > Hello Bruce, >=20 > Thursday, September 23, 2004, 8:54:19 AM, you wrote: >=20 > >> What about directories that I definitively shouldn't restore, for > >> example: > >> /usr/include /usr/lib most likely /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin /stand > >> and so on, maybe that could help me better. >=20 > > Here's the deal. For any of the systems I maintain, I wouldn't > > restore any of these from backups after a source upgrade because in > > general, those directories contain *only* files installed from the > > base system. But how can I tell how *you* have *your* system set up? >=20 > Well, I'm avoiding to change anything in system files, and all > additional stuff I'm actually putting in /usr/local. >=20 > I'm interested about directories that are changed by system/system > programs - I belive most confusing is /var in theory there shouldn't > be anything important there (well except logs), but I already noticed > there is mail, crontab jobs, informations what ports were installed > even mysql port install database there.=20 By design /var contains things that change frequently during system operation, not things that are unimportant. Thing in /var/run and /var/tmp are required to be things you can lose, but many of the rest of the directories are of crucial importance. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --EgVrEAR5UttbsTXg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFBUxikXY6L6fI4GtQRAsnkAJ9yea+tYenc36Z5gIQ8X6OO95mLmQCfX2ff DaVHmKY0YTBHmUB2ET7Z30U= =aKMz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EgVrEAR5UttbsTXg-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 23 19:19:50 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CCA016A4CE; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 19:19:50 +0000 (GMT) Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU [128.205.32.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0B2343D54; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 19:19:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kensmith@cse.Buffalo.EDU) Received: from electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (kensmith@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i8NJJmTH000469; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:19:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from kensmith@localhost) by electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU (8.12.10/8.12.9/Submit) id i8NJJm9W000468; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:19:48 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:19:48 -0400 From: Ken Smith To: Brooks Davis Message-ID: <20040923191947.GA102@electra.cse.Buffalo.EDU> References: <20040920211231.89904.qmail@web53808.mail.yahoo.com> <200409201753.38308.so14k@so14k.com> <414F9C6D.9020709@corp.grupos.com.br> <20040921041017.GA963@tomcat.kitchenlab.org> <127205680265.20040920222835@takeda.tk> <20040921154116.GB36705@tomcat.kitchenlab.org> <12247499375.20040921100534@takeda.tk> <20040923155419.GB53845@tomcat.kitchenlab.org> <56421822718.20040923103059@takeda.tk> <20040923184037.GE25699@odin.ac.hmc.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040923184037.GE25699@odin.ac.hmc.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: "Bruce A. Mah" cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: upgrade questions 4.10 -> 5-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 19:19:50 -0000 On Thu, Sep 23, 2004 at 11:40:37AM -0700, Brooks Davis wrote: > By design /var contains things that change frequently during system > operation, not things that are unimportant. Thing in /var/run and > /var/tmp are required to be things you can lose, but many of the rest of > the directories are of crucial importance. [ From an ancient dinosaur ... ] I believe the original motivation for /var came from the days when big servers were where most stuff was stored, including the bulk of the system files (some machines actually ran with no disks at all, some ran with tiny drives with just enough space for a minimal root filesystem plus swap space). The design goal was to set things up so /usr could be shared among lots of machines, and except for the machine that actually had it on the local drive all machines sharing it would mount it read-only. /var was where stuff that could not be shared and/or needed to be written to went. So you see spool files (mail, printer, etc.) go there, log files go there, cron job definitions go there, etc. -- Ken Smith - From there to here, from here to | kensmith@cse.buffalo.edu there, funny things are everywhere. | - Theodore Geisel | From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 23 20:35:59 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB9016A4CE for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 20:35:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mproxy.gmail.com (rproxy.gmail.com [64.233.170.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1928943D1F for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 20:35:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from swhetzel@gmail.com) Received: by mproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 79so2464501rnk for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:34:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.164.27 with SMTP id m27mr224578rne; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:33:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.38.75.49 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 13:33:01 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <790a9fff04092313334c105026@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 15:33:01 -0500 From: Scot Hetzel To: Norman Uittenbogaart|Webminded In-Reply-To: <4152913A.5080408@webminded.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit References: <20040909120120.30C1016A4D0@hub.freebsd.org> <4152913A.5080408@webminded.nl> cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Postgres downgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Scot Hetzel List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 20:35:59 -0000 On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 11:02:50 +0200, Norman Uittenbogaart|Webminded wrote: > I upgraded my postgres without dumping my data and reimport them, so now > my database won t start, > > > [root@cp root]# /usr/local/etc/rc.d/010.pgsql.sh start > > pgsqlFATAL: database files are incompatible with server > > DETAIL: The data directory was initialized by PostgreSQL version 7.3, which is not compatible with this version 7.4.2. > > Now how can I downgrade from Postgres 7.4.2 back to Postgres 7.3 without > loosing my data ? > Would a make install in /usr/ports/databases/postgresql73 be sufficient ? > First backup/export the database to a file, then uninstall Postgres 7.4.2, and install Postgres 7.3. If the downgrade results in your database being unreadable to Postgres 7.3, then remove the database and use the backup to restore it. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 23 23:37:15 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318E416A4CE for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 23:37:15 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail2.bmount.com (mail2.bmount.com [209.247.160.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE1FE43D2D for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 23:37:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mmca@2531.org) Received: from one.2531.org (mmca@home.madfu.net [66.218.57.230]) by mail2.bmount.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with SMTP id i8NNddDx023874 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:39:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from mmca@2531.org) Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 16:37:51 -0700 (PDT) From: mmca@2531.org To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040923163732.C22808@bar.2531.bet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.71, clamav-milter version 0.71 X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 23:37:15 -0000 Does the ath driver not work with the DWL-AG530 under 5.3-BETA5? ath0@pci1:8:0: class=0x020000 card=0x3a141186 chip=0x0013168c rev=0x01 hdr=0x00 vendor = 'Atheros Communications Inc.' device = 'AR5213 802.11a/b/g Wireless Adapter' class = network subclass = ethernet ath0: mem 0xdb000000-0xdb00ffff irq 10 at device 8.0 on pci1 ath0: mac 5.9 phy 4.3 5ghz radio 3.6 ath0: unable to collect channel list from hal device_attach: ath0 attach returned 22 ive also tried the patch at: http://www.anobject.com/jehamby/atheros_driver.tar.bz2 Any help would be appreciated. . Cheers, -M From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 24 02:17:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B743416A4CE for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 02:17:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freebsd.takeda.tk (node-402413e2.sna.onnet.us.uu.net [64.36.19.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C401643D2F for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 02:16:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from takeda@takeda.tk) Received: from takeda.lan (takeda.lan [10.0.0.3]) by freebsd.takeda.tk (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8O2GvBI089212 for ; Thu, 23 Sep 2004 19:16:57 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from takeda@takeda.tk) Resent-Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 19:16:57 -0700 (PDT) Resent-Message-Id: <200409240216.i8O2GvBI089212@freebsd.takeda.tk> Date: Thu, 23 Sep 2004 19:16:57 -0700 From: Dariusz Kulinski X-Mailer: The Bat! (v2.01) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <83874859.20040923191657@takeda.tk> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Resent-From: Dariusz Kulinski MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: upgrade questions 4.10 -> 5-stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 02:17:02 -0000 Hello Bruce, Thursday, September 23, 2004, 8:54:19 AM, you wrote: >> What about directories that I definitively shouldn't restore, for >> example: >> /usr/include /usr/lib most likely /bin /sbin /usr/bin /usr/sbin /stand >> and so on, maybe that could help me better. > Here's the deal. For any of the systems I maintain, I wouldn't > restore any of these from backups after a source upgrade because in > general, those directories contain *only* files installed from the > base system. But how can I tell how *you* have *your* system set up? Well, I'm avoiding to change anything in system files, and all additional stuff I'm actually putting in /usr/local. I'm interested about directories that are changed by system/system programs - I belive most confusing is /var in theory there shouldn't be anything important there (well except logs), but I already noticed there is mail, crontab jobs, informations what ports were installed even mysql port install database there. >> That step was in source upgrade category, so I assumed it might not >> be correct for binary upgrade. > You *asked* about the source upgrade procedure above. I'm sorry, I see now. I wrote one thing but I was thinking about another. I meant binary upgrade, sorry for the confusion. > For binary upgrades, it's probably best to carefully examine the files > in your backups and merge the changes in by hand. After a binary > install, the old files will be gone, so there won't be anything for > mergemaster to operate on. Yes that's true, but using mergemaster is less work. And I still have old files in backup. > Good candidates for merging are: /etc/passwd, /etc/group, and > /etc/rc.conf. Don't just blindly drop in your backup files. So I see next step - selecting which files from /etc are needed to be restored. >> What about ports, I know that I need to recompile them, but will they >> work for that time? > We believe that most ports will work if you install the compat4x > libraries and don't upgrade anything. But there's a few that *need* > to be upgraded, due to changes in the statfs structure. Also if > you're going to upgrade ports in the future, it's probably safest to > reinstall all ports. I see >> It's not really mission-critical, but it's like that for me :) >> It works as my mail/web server so I want to have shortest downtime >> possible :) > Then you want to take your time and do things carefully so that you > don't have a longer downtime caused by screwing up the upgrade. I've > had this happen more times than I can count (not on FreeBSD, but the > experience applies). Thank you very much for your tips on upgrading. -- Best regards, Dariusz mailto:takeda@takeda.tk CCNA, SCSA, SCNA, LPIC, MCP certified http://www.takeda.tk From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 24 15:50:14 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 522C816A5A1; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:50:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post5.inre.asu.edu (post5.inre.asu.edu [129.219.110.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0221743D3F; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:50:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from David.Bear@asu.edu) Received: from conversion.post5.inre.asu.edu by asu.edu (PMDF V6.1-1X6 #30769) id <0I4J00A01YH07Q@asu.edu>; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:46:13 -0700 (MST) Received: from smtp.asu.edu (smtp.asu.edu [129.219.110.107]) <0I4J00981YH0VI@asu.edu>; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:46:12 -0700 (MST) Received: from moroni.pp.asu.edu (moroni.pp.asu.edu [129.219.69.200]) (8.12.10/8.12.10/asu_smtp_relay,nullclient,tcp_wrapped) with ESMTP id i8OFkA71011551; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:46:10 -0700 (MST) Received: by moroni.pp.asu.edu (Postfix, from userid 500) id C48C9E11; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:46:01 -0700 (MST) Received: from post1.inre.asu.edu (post1.inre.asu.edu [129.219.110.72]) by imap1.asu.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0/asu_cyrus,tcp_wrapped) with ESMTP id g03L9VN23855 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2002 14:09:31 -0700 (MST) Received: from conversion.post1.inre.asu.edu by asu.edu (PMDF V6.1 #40110) david.bear@asu.edu) ; Thu, 03 Jan 2002 14:09:30 -0700 (MST) Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.119]) by asu.edu (PMDF V6.1 #40110) with ESMTP id <0GPD00JIES3UP9@asu.edu> for iddwb@IMAP1.ASU.EDU (ORCPT david.bear@asu.edu); Thu, 03 Jan 2002 14:09:30 -0700 (MST) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.18]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CDA255BE7; Thu, 03 Jan 2002 13:08:56 -0800 Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 538) id 51EA137B447; Thu, 03 Jan 2002 13:08:09 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF0222E820D; Thu, 03 Jan 2002 13:08:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by hub.freebsd.org (bulk_mailer v1.12); Thu, 03 Jan 2002 13:08:06 -0800 Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rdu57-28-046.nc.rr.com [66.57.28.46]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2109137B41F; Thu, 03 Jan 2002 13:07:58 -0800 (PST) Received: from shumai.marcuscom.com (marcus@shumai.marcuscom.com [192.168.1.4])g03L7Iv27504; Thu, 03 Jan 2002 16:07:18 -0500 (EST envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com) From: Joe Clarke In-reply-to: Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG To: dwbear75@gmail.com Message-id: <1010092075.86152.20.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution/1.0 (Preview Release) Content-type: text/plain Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Delivered-to: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Old-To: msch@snafu.de Lines: 43 References: X-Keywords: cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG cc: Peter.Sauerland@siemens.com cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG cc: iss@cert.siemens.de Subject: Re: TCP Sequence-Prediction (4.5-PRE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:50:14 -0000 X-Original-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 16:07:55 -0500 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:50:14 -0000 On Thu, 2002-01-03 at 15:59, Matthias Schuendehuette wrote: > Hello, > > my machine at work was scanned with the ISS Scanner, Vers. 6.2.1 and it > complained about TCP Sequence Prediction: > > 'The TCP sequence was found to be predictable.' > > I was advised to install FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE after 2000-09-28 or later > :-) as listed in FreBSD-SA-00:52. > > I looked at the published Patch in FreBSD-SA-00:52 but couldn't find > the Sourcecode Sequence to be patched any more (I wasn't wondering). > > But so, what shall I do, who's to blame? Is the ISS lying? Is there any > advice from the FreeBSD Security Officer or the developers how to > proceed further? Is this what you're looking for: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/CERT/patches/SA-00%3A52/tcp-iss.patch Joe > > TIA - Matthias > > -- > *************************************************************************** > * Matthias Schuendehuette msch@snafu.de * > * Solmsstrasse 44 * > * D-10961 Berlin Engineering Systems Support and Operation * > * Germany (Powered by FreeBSD 4.5-PRERELEASE) * > *************************************************************************** > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 24 15:50:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D116716A56E for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:50:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post5.inre.asu.edu (post5.inre.asu.edu [129.219.110.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59B8143D2F for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:50:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from David.Bear@asu.edu) Received: from conversion.post5.inre.asu.edu by asu.edu (PMDF V6.1-1X6 #30769) id <0I4J00A01YH07R@asu.edu> for freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:46:13 -0700 (MST) Received: from smtp.asu.edu (smtp.asu.edu [129.219.110.107]) <0I4J00A1MYH05Y@asu.edu>; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:46:12 -0700 (MST) Received: from moroni.pp.asu.edu (moroni.pp.asu.edu [129.219.69.200]) (8.12.10/8.12.10/asu_smtp_relay,nullclient,tcp_wrapped) with ESMTP id i8OFkA71011548; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:46:10 -0700 (MST) Received: by moroni.pp.asu.edu (Postfix, from userid 500) id B5ABCE21; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:46:01 -0700 (MST) Received: from post1.inre.asu.edu (post1.inre.asu.edu [129.219.110.72]) by imap1.asu.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0/asu_cyrus,tcp_wrapped) with ESMTP id g03L0SN20229 for ; Thu, 03 Jan 2002 14:00:29 -0700 (MST) Received: from conversion.post1.inre.asu.edu by asu.edu (PMDF V6.1 #40110) david.bear@asu.edu) ; Thu, 03 Jan 2002 14:00:28 -0700 (MST) Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.119]) by asu.edu (PMDF V6.1 #40110) with ESMTP id <0GPD00JWKROSP9@asu.edu> for iddwb@IMAP1.ASU.EDU (ORCPT david.bear@asu.edu); Thu, 03 Jan 2002 14:00:28 -0700 (MST) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.18]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3397155AC5; Thu, 03 Jan 2002 13:00:04 -0800 Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 538) id DF48537B41C; Thu, 03 Jan 2002 12:59:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 09DB12E820B; Thu, 03 Jan 2002 12:59:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by hub.freebsd.org (bulk_mailer v1.12); Thu, 03 Jan 2002 12:59:46 -0800 Received: from clever.eusc.inter.net (clever.eusc.inter.net [213.73.101.4]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4BE037B417; Thu, 03 Jan 2002 12:59:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from tc11-n67-101.de.inter.net ([213.73.67.101] helo=there) 16MExc-0003MK-00; Thu, 03 Jan 2002 21:59:36 +0100 From: Matthias Schuendehuette Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG To: dwbear75@gmail.com Message-id: Organization: Micro$oft-free Zone MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.1] Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Delivered-to: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Old-To: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Lines: 29 X-Keywords: cc: iss@cert.siemens.de cc: Peter.Sauerland@siemens.com cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: TCP Sequence-Prediction (4.5-PRE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Reply-To: msch@snafu.de List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:50:31 -0000 X-Original-Date: Thu, 03 Jan 2002 21:59:35 +0100 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:50:31 -0000 Hello, my machine at work was scanned with the ISS Scanner, Vers. 6.2.1 and it complained about TCP Sequence Prediction: 'The TCP sequence was found to be predictable.' I was advised to install FreeBSD 4.1.1-STABLE after 2000-09-28 or later :-) as listed in FreBSD-SA-00:52. I looked at the published Patch in FreBSD-SA-00:52 but couldn't find the Sourcecode Sequence to be patched any more (I wasn't wondering). But so, what shall I do, who's to blame? Is the ISS lying? Is there any advice from the FreeBSD Security Officer or the developers how to proceed further? TIA - Matthias -- *************************************************************************** * Matthias Schuendehuette msch@snafu.de * * Solmsstrasse 44 * * D-10961 Berlin Engineering Systems Support and Operation * * Germany (Powered by FreeBSD 4.5-PRERELEASE) * *************************************************************************** To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 24 15:51:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3563616A511; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:51:10 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post5.inre.asu.edu (post5.inre.asu.edu [129.219.110.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 138C243D2F; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:51:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from David.Bear@asu.edu) Received: from conversion.post5.inre.asu.edu by asu.edu (PMDF V6.1-1X6 #30769) id <0I4J00B01YJH6R@asu.edu>; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:47:41 -0700 (MST) Received: from smtp.asu.edu (smtp.asu.edu [129.219.110.107]) <0I4J009CFYJHVB@asu.edu>; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:47:41 -0700 (MST) Received: from moroni.pp.asu.edu (moroni.pp.asu.edu [129.219.69.200]) (8.12.10/8.12.10/asu_smtp_relay,nullclient,tcp_wrapped) with ESMTP id i8OFld71013789; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:47:39 -0700 (MST) Received: by moroni.pp.asu.edu (Postfix, from userid 500) id 70FFAE84; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:47:06 -0700 (MST) Received: from post1.inre.asu.edu (post1.inre.asu.edu [129.219.110.72]) by imap1.asu.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0/asu_cyrus,tcp_wrapped) with ESMTP id h0302hi14677 for ; Thu, 02 Jan 2003 17:02:43 -0700 (MST) Received: from conversion.post1.inre.asu.edu by asu.edu (PMDF V6.1 #40110) david.bear@asu.edu) ; Thu, 02 Jan 2003 17:02:44 -0700 (MST) Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [216.136.204.119]) by asu.edu (PMDF V6.1 #40110) with ESMTP id <0H84004EF2SKS7@asu.edu> for iddwb@IMAP1.ASU.EDU (ORCPT david.bear@asu.edu); Thu, 02 Jan 2003 17:02:44 -0700 (MST) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.freebsd.org [216.136.204.18]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C97595577A; Thu, 02 Jan 2003 16:02:40 -0800 Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 538) id 6CC9537B406; Thu, 02 Jan 2003 16:02:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4FBFB2E8023; Thu, 02 Jan 2003 16:02:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by hub.freebsd.org (bulk_mailer v1.12); Thu, 02 Jan 2003 16:02:39 -0800 Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2F037B405 for ; Thu, 02 Jan 2003 16:02:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from marklar.blazingdot.com (marklar.blazingdot.com [207.154.84.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1250A43EC5 for ; Thu, 02 Jan 2003 16:02:38 -0800 (PST envelope-from marcus@blazingdot.com) Received: (qmail 52663 invoked by uid 503); Fri, 03 Jan 2003 00:02:32 +0000 From: Marcus Reid In-reply-to: <200212170023.gBH0Nvlu000764@beast.csl.sri.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG To: dwbear75@gmail.com Message-id: <20030103000232.GA52181@blazingdot.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-to: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Old-To: Mike Hogsett User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Coffee-Level: nearly-fatal Lines: 13 References: <200212170023.gBH0Nvlu000764@beast.csl.sri.com> cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD Stability X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:51:11 -0000 X-Original-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 16:02:32 -0800 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:51:11 -0000 I like to point people in the direction of: http://uptime.netcraft.com/up/today/top.avg.html The list is dominated by FreeBSD machines with uptimes of longer than 1000 days. Go FreeBSD. Marcus To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 24 15:51:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CB3F16A4F3; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:51:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post5.inre.asu.edu (post5.inre.asu.edu [129.219.110.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BC1943D46; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:51:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from David.Bear@asu.edu) Received: from conversion.post5.inre.asu.edu by asu.edu (PMDF V6.1-1X6 #30769) id <0I4J00B01YJJ7L@asu.edu>; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:47:43 -0700 (MST) Received: from smtp.asu.edu (smtp.asu.edu [129.219.110.107]) <0I4J009LNYJJT5@asu.edu>; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:47:43 -0700 (MST) Received: from moroni.pp.asu.edu (moroni.pp.asu.edu [129.219.69.200]) (8.12.10/8.12.10/asu_smtp_relay,nullclient,tcp_wrapped) with ESMTP id i8OFlf71013834; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:47:41 -0700 (MST) Received: by moroni.pp.asu.edu (Postfix, from userid 500) id CCA63E09; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:47:07 -0700 (MST) Received: from post1.inre.asu.edu (post1.inre.asu.edu [129.219.110.72]) by imap1.asu.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0/asu_cyrus,tcp_wrapped) with ESMTP id h03LYwi18055 for ; Fri, 03 Jan 2003 14:34:58 -0700 (MST) Received: from conversion.post1.inre.asu.edu by asu.edu (PMDF V6.1 #40110) david.bear@asu.edu) ; Fri, 03 Jan 2003 14:34:57 -0700 (MST) Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [216.136.204.119]) by asu.edu (PMDF V6.1 #40110) with ESMTP id <0H8500C7FQM8Z2@asu.edu> for iddwb@IMAP1.ASU.EDU (ORCPT david.bear@asu.edu); Fri, 03 Jan 2003 14:34:57 -0700 (MST) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.freebsd.org [216.136.204.18]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FAA355B00; Fri, 03 Jan 2003 13:34:55 -0800 Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 538) id D5A0F37B405; Fri, 03 Jan 2003 13:34:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B87172E8010; Fri, 03 Jan 2003 13:34:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by hub.freebsd.org (bulk_mailer v1.12); Fri, 03 Jan 2003 13:34:53 -0800 Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF3D337B401; Fri, 03 Jan 2003 13:34:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from nomad.eng.cstone.net (nomad.eng.cstone.net [209.145.66.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2187143EB2; Fri, 03 Jan 2003 13:34:51 -0800 (PST envelope-from wer@cstone.net) Received: from cstone.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nomad.eng.cstone.net (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h03LYjPt002606; Fri, 03 Jan 2003 16:34:45 -0500 (EST envelope-from wer@cstone.net) From: William E Reid Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG To: dwbear75@gmail.com Message-id: <3E1601F5.6F5BA96F@cstone.net> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.76 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.4.2 i386) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Accept-Language: en Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-to: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Old-To: Hans Lambermont Lines: 61 References: <20021103220206.GA575@moya.lambermont.dyndns.org> <20021116173855.GA651@moya.lambermont.dyndns.org> cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Spontaneous 4.7-S reboots when using a Serial over USB adapter X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:51:13 -0000 X-Original-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2003 16:34:45 -0500 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:51:13 -0000 I have noticed that if I disconnect the serial port from my usb to serial adapter and leave the dongle in(Aten International Serial adapter, SiS 5571 usb controller), my machine will reset as soon as I [Attempt to] send data from the usb side. So maybe you are losing carrier signal sometime during the transfer. Another machine with a Via 83C572 USB controller does the same thing. Sis is running 4.7 Stable from Jan 2 2003. Via is running 4.6 Stable from Aug 23 2002. -=Bill Hans Lambermont wrote: > Some more info: setting the serial line speed from 115200 baud down to > 9600 does not help; after a few minutes syncing my palmpilot I got > another reboot. Is anyone succesfully using a Prolific Technology PL2303 > Serial adapter with a 82801CA/CAM ICH3 USB controller ? > Any hints are welcome. > > I got no response yet to my previous mail: > > > I'm seeing spontaneous reboots when using a Prolific Technology PL2303 > > Serial adapter (this is a serial to USB convertor) for a palm-pilot full > > backup (using pilot-xfer) on one of my FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE machines. > > The reboots are reproduceable. Nothing shows up in the logs. > > Small data transfers, like syncing my addressbook, go without problems. > > > > Here is the problem-box relevant dmesg log: > > > > FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE #2: Sat Oct 26 16:36:31 CEST 2002 > > uplcom0: Prolific Technology PL2303 Serial adapter (ATEN/IOGEAR UC232A), rev 1.10/2.02, addr 2 > > uhci0: port 0xb400-0xb41f irq 9 at device 4.2 on pci0 > > usb0: on uhci0 > > usb0: USB revision 1.0 > > > > My other FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE machine runs the backup without problems > > using the same PL2303 Serial adapter (and palm pilot ;-). > > > > FreeBSD 4.7-STABLE #0: Sat Oct 26 19:16:48 CEST 2002 > > uplcom0: Prolific Technology PL2303 Serial adapter (ATEN/IOGEAR UC232A), rev 1.10/2.02, addr 2 > > uhci0: port 0x1800-0x181f irq 10 at device 29.0 on pci0 > > usb0: on uhci0 > > usb0: USB revision 1.0 > > > > But it has a different USB controller chipset. > > > > Is this perhaps a known issue with the 82801CA/CAM ICH3 USB controller ? > > regards, > Hans Lambermont > -- > http://lambermont.webhop.org/ > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 24 15:51:31 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BCD416A652; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:51:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post5.inre.asu.edu (post5.inre.asu.edu [129.219.110.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD06743D2F; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:51:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from David.Bear@asu.edu) Received: from conversion.post5.inre.asu.edu by asu.edu (PMDF V6.1-1X6 #30769) id <0I4J00B01YJVBS@asu.edu>; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:47:55 -0700 (MST) Received: from smtp.asu.edu (smtp.asu.edu [129.219.110.107]) <0I4J009N2YJVT5@asu.edu>; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:47:55 -0700 (MST) Received: from moroni.pp.asu.edu (moroni.pp.asu.edu [129.219.69.200]) (8.12.10/8.12.10/asu_smtp_relay,nullclient,tcp_wrapped) with ESMTP id i8OFlm71014010; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:47:48 -0700 (MST) Received: by moroni.pp.asu.edu (Postfix, from userid 500) id BB9BEF2D; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:47:12 -0700 (MST) Received: from post1.inre.asu.edu (post1.inre.asu.edu [129.219.110.72]) by imap1.asu.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0/asu_cyrus,tcp_wrapped) with ESMTP id h06NbOi18624 for ; Mon, 06 Jan 2003 16:37:24 -0700 (MST) Received: from conversion.post1.inre.asu.edu by asu.edu (PMDF V6.1 #40110) david.bear@asu.edu) ; Mon, 06 Jan 2003 16:37:24 -0700 (MST) Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [216.136.204.119]) by asu.edu (PMDF V6.1 #40110) with ESMTP id <0H8B00MQ7GACZP@asu.edu> for iddwb@IMAP1.ASU.EDU (ORCPT david.bear@asu.edu); Mon, 06 Jan 2003 16:37:24 -0700 (MST) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.freebsd.org [216.136.204.18]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04330554D0; Mon, 06 Jan 2003 15:37:23 -0800 Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 538) id 4B8C837B405; Mon, 06 Jan 2003 15:37:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2DF542E801E; Mon, 06 Jan 2003 15:37:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by hub.freebsd.org (bulk_mailer v1.12); Mon, 06 Jan 2003 15:37:21 -0800 Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B17937B401; Mon, 06 Jan 2003 15:37:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from shockwave.systems.pipex.net(Postfix) with ESMTP id B575643EA9; Mon, 06 Jan 2003 15:37:18 -0800 Received: from [192.168.1.8] (81-86-129-77.dsl.pipex.com [81.86.129.77]) by shockwave.systems.pipex.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03D32160016F5; Mon, 06 Jan 2003 23:37:16 +0000 (GMT) From: Stacey Roberts In-reply-to: <20030107002259.1375e9ad.c.prevotaux@hexanet.fr> Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG To: dwbear75@gmail.com Message-id: <1041896240.51041.164.camel@localhost> Organization: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.2.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-to: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Old-To: Christophe Prevotaux Lines: 59 References: <20030107002259.1375e9ad.c.prevotaux@hexanet.fr> cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Audio board [HELP] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Reply-To: stacey@vickiandstacey.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:51:32 -0000 X-Original-Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2003 23:37:21 +0000 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:51:32 -0000 Hi Christophe, On Mon, 2003-01-06 at 23:22, Christophe Prevotaux wrote: > I have a Gateway Laptop running 4-STABLE however I can't seem to find the correct > driver for the onboard audio chip which is: > > > none0@pci0:9:0: class=0x040100 card=0x2150107b chip=0x89381102 rev=0x00 hdr=0x00 > vendor = 'Creative Labs' > device = 'EV1938 Sound' > class = multimedia > subclass = audio > Err., have you tried adding device pcm to the kernel and recompiling? See the handbook (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sound-setup) for details on this procedure. You've not indicated exactly what problem you're having, so I've presumed that its just a case of not knowing how to add sound support with the specific card you have. Hope this hslps some. Regards, Stacey > > Could anyone tell me if this is a supported chipset or if someone has patches > or drivers for this chipset. > > > > > -- > =============================================================== > Christophe Prevotaux Email: c.prevotaux@hexanet.fr > HEXANET SARL URL: http://www.hexanet.fr/ > Z.A.C Les Charmilles Tel: +33 (0)3 26 79 30 05 > 3 Allée Thierry Sabine Direct: +33 (0)3 26 61 77 72 > BP202 Fax: +33 (0)3 26 79 30 06 > 51686 Reims Cedex 2 > FRANCE HEXANET Network Operation Center > =============================================================== > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message -- Stacey Roberts B.Sc (HONS) Computer Science Web: www.vickiandstacey.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 24 15:52:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63E3F16A550; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:52:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post5.inre.asu.edu (post5.inre.asu.edu [129.219.110.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 368FB43D1F; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:52:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from David.Bear@asu.edu) Received: from conversion.post5.inre.asu.edu by asu.edu (PMDF V6.1-1X6 #30769) id <0I4J00B01YKQM3@asu.edu>; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:48:26 -0700 (MST) Received: from smtp.asu.edu (smtp.asu.edu [129.219.110.107]) <0I4J00B7QYKQGB@asu.edu>; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:48:26 -0700 (MST) Received: from moroni.pp.asu.edu (moroni.pp.asu.edu [129.219.69.200]) (8.12.10/8.12.10/asu_smtp_relay,nullclient,tcp_wrapped) with ESMTP id i8OFmO71014932; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:48:24 -0700 (MST) Received: by moroni.pp.asu.edu (Postfix, from userid 500) id 302B1E57; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:47:40 -0700 (MST) Received: from post1.inre.asu.edu (post1.inre.asu.edu [129.219.110.72]) by imap1.asu.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0/asu_cyrus,tcp_wrapped) with ESMTP id h0MKCJi08463 for ; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 13:12:20 -0700 (MST) Received: from conversion.post1.inre.asu.edu by asu.edu (PMDF V6.1 #40110) david.bear@asu.edu) ; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 13:12:21 -0700 (MST) Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [216.136.204.119]) by asu.edu (PMDF V6.1 #40110) with ESMTP id <0H94006WITGKMV@asu.edu> for iddwb@IMAP1.ASU.EDU (ORCPT david.bear@asu.edu); Wed, 22 Jan 2003 13:12:21 -0700 (MST) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.freebsd.org [216.136.204.18]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9E3F5607E; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:11:58 -0800 Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 538) id D258C37B429; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:11:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B483D2E8017; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:11:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by hub.freebsd.org (bulk_mailer v1.12); Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:11:52 -0800 Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D5937B401; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:11:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from oahu.WURLDLINK.NET (oahu.WURLDLINK.NET [216.235.52.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8F8D43F1E; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 12:11:49 -0800 Received: from localhost (vince@localhost) by oahu.WURLDLINK.NET (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id h0MKB2237753; Wed, 22 Jan 2003 10:11:02 -1000 From: Vincent Poy In-reply-to: <001101c2c252$03ebd850$12387618@q1d0p9> Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG To: dwbear75@gmail.com Message-id: <20030122100925.O3206-100000@oahu.WURLDLINK.NET> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-to: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Old-To: kwythers@umn.edu Lines: 59 cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.7->5.0, ran out of space on / X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:52:22 -0000 X-Original-Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2003 10:11:02 -1000 (HST) X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:52:22 -0000 On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Kirk R. Wythers wrote: > I just ran into a problem trying to install the 5.0 world. I thought I > checked and had 30M free on / before I started this. However, after > building, the world, building the kernel, installing the kernel, running > mergemaster -p, I went to install the world and got the error 'out of > space on /' > > I need to find some room, but I'm a little nervous about what I can rm. > Here is what I'm looking at: > > 1) / partition is 79M, 64M are used (I was almost sure there was > more room than that on / before I satarted). > 2) /tmp is on it's own partition > 3) du -h on subdirectories breakdown like this. > a. 18M /boot > b. 1.4M /etc > c. 3.7M /kernel > d. 3.9M /kern.GENERIC > e. 6M /modules > f. 21M /sbin > g. 2.1M /stand > > as you can see that pretty much accounts for it. The rest of the stuff > is pretty small. > > I need to know if I can delete any of this stuff and still successfully > do a 'make installworld'? > > Thanks, > > Kirk > > Ps... sorry about cross posting (I wasn't sure if 5-release qualified > for the stable list) /boot is something you need to keep since the kernel and the kernel modules have all been moved to /boot in 5.0 /etc should stay too /kernel /kernel.GENERIC /modules can all be deleted since these are now in /boot /sbin /stand should stay Cheers, Vince - vince@WURLDLINK.NET - Vice President ________ __ ____ Unix Networking Operations - FreeBSD-Real Unix for Free / / / / | / |[__ ] WurldLink Corporation / / / / | / | __] ] San Francisco - Honolulu - Hong Kong / / / / / |/ / | __] ] HongKong Stars/Gravis UltraSound Mailing Lists Admin /_/_/_/_/|___/|_|[____] Almighty1@IRC - oahu.DAL.NET Hawaii's DALnet IRC Network Server Admin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 24 15:53:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15B3416A62B; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:53:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from post5.inre.asu.edu (post5.inre.asu.edu [129.219.110.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E157443D39; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:53:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from David.Bear@asu.edu) Received: from conversion.post5.inre.asu.edu by asu.edu (PMDF V6.1-1X6 #30769) id <0I4J00B01YLSZD@asu.edu>; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:49:04 -0700 (MST) Received: from smtp.asu.edu (smtp.asu.edu [129.219.110.107]) <0I4J00B08YLHVH@asu.edu>; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:49:03 -0700 (MST) Received: from moroni.pp.asu.edu (moroni.pp.asu.edu [129.219.69.200]) (8.12.10/8.12.10/asu_smtp_relay,nullclient,tcp_wrapped) with ESMTP id i8OFmp71015653; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:48:51 -0700 (MST) Received: by moroni.pp.asu.edu (Postfix, from userid 500) id A0941FA9; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 08:48:02 -0700 (MST) Received: from post1.inre.asu.edu (post1.inre.asu.edu [129.219.110.72]) by moroni.pp.asu.edu (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h12KKtk11536 for ; Sun, 02 Feb 2003 13:20:55 -0700 Received: from conversion.post1.inre.asu.edu by asu.edu (PMDF V6.1 #40110) id <0H9P0020176VB1@asu.edu> for iddwb@moroni.pp.asu.edu (ORCPT david.bear@asu.edu); Sun, 02 Feb 2003 13:20:55 -0700 (MST) Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [216.136.204.119]) by asu.edu (PMDF V6.1 #40110) with ESMTP id <0H9P000B276VEX@asu.edu> for iddwb@moroni.pp.asu.edu (ORCPT david.bear@asu.edu); Sun, 02 Feb 2003 13:20:55 -0700 (MST) Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.freebsd.org [216.136.204.18]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DE9156B81; Sun, 02 Feb 2003 12:20:53 -0800 Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 538) id D829637B401; Sun, 02 Feb 2003 12:20:51 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B9B582E8000; Sun, 02 Feb 2003 12:20:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by hub.freebsd.org (bulk_mailer v1.12); Sun, 02 Feb 2003 12:20:51 -0800 Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C82BA37B405; Sun, 02 Feb 2003 12:20:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from lyceum.netmojo.ca (lyceum.pims.sfu.ca [142.58.49.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F18343F79; Sun, 02 Feb 2003 12:20:49 -0800 Received: from lyceum.netmojo.ca (flowctrl@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lyceum.netmojo.ca (8.12.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h12KKhxc014921; Sun, 02 Feb 2003 12:20:43 -0800 Received: (from brent@localhost) by lyceum.netmojo.ca (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id h12KKheZ014920; Sun, 02 Feb 2003 12:20:43 -0800 (PST) X-URL: http://brent.kearneys.ca From: Brent Kearney In-reply-to: <15933.30462.77008.33453@guru.mired.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG To: dwbear75@gmail.com Message-id: <20030202202043.GA14875@kearneys.ca> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-disposition: inline Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-to: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Old-To: Mike Meyer User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Lines: 58 References: <20030202185009.GA14514@kearneys.ca> <20030202185916.GA14615@kearneys.ca> <20030202191806.GA14696@kearneys.ca> <15933.30462.77008.33453@guru.mired.org> cc: stable@FreeBSD.ORG cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: filesystem disappeared following 4.2 -> 4.7 upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Reply-To: brent@kearneys.ca List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:53:17 -0000 X-Original-Date: Sun, 02 Feb 2003 12:20:43 -0800 X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 15:53:17 -0000 On Sun, Feb 02, 2003 at 01:52:30PM -0600, Mike Meyer wrote: > In <20030202191806.GA14696@kearneys.ca>, Brent Kearney typed: > > No /dev/ad5s1, etc., and `mount /dev/ad5s1 /home` produces only: > > > > mount: /dev/ad5s1: No such file or directory > > > > Do I need to make device nodes for the ad5s1 partition? I'm not sure how, > > if so. > > Yes, you need to make device nodes. Try: > > # cd /dev > # ./MAKEDEV ad5s1c > Or s1a, or whatever you were using. Thanks Mike; `/dev/MAKEDEV ad5` made all of the nodes, and I was able to mount /dev/ad5s1e, and relieve my panic ;). What if this system were an all-IDE system? I was planning to update one soon, and will no doubt run into this problem. The root filesystem device node will change names, and according to this thread: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=2388792+2394647+/usr/local/www/db/text/2003/freebsd-questions/20030112.freebsd-questions even if I anticipate what the new name will be (how do I do that, anyways?), updating /etc/fstab before rebooting with the new binaries won't help. It doesn't look like anyone followed up on that thread, but maybe I'm using the wrong search criteria. The note in /usr/src/UPDATING on this new ata code is quite sparse, given what people may unexpectedly run into when updating on IDE systems. That should probably be fixed to include the requirement of doing not only `MAKEDEV all`, but also `MAKEDEV ` to create partition nodes, and whatever needs to be done for booting onto the newly named partitions, if the / is on one of them. Best regards, Brent > The reason ad0 turned into ad5 is that ata disk devices are now > numbered statically instead of dynamically. This is a good > thing. While it does mean that your drives move when you upgrade the > OS this one time, it also means that they won't move when you add a > drive to the system. > > -- > Mike Meyer http://www.mired.org/consulting.html > Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 24 16:36:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CEEC16A4CE; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 16:36:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from aibo.runbox.com (aibo.runbox.com [193.71.199.94]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 001B243D1D; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 16:36:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from agrant@runbox.com) Received: from [10.9.9.9] (helo=fetch.runbox.com) by bolivar.runbox.com with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1CAt3Z-0000lW-9d; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 18:36:25 +0200 Received: from [63.151.141.97] (helo=[192.168.1.101]) by fetch.runbox.com with asmtp (uid:34916) (Exim 4.24) id 1CAt3Z-0003uK-2q; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 18:36:25 +0200 Message-ID: <41544D07.8090202@runbox.com> Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 11:36:23 -0500 From: AL Grant User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Macintosh/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Sender: 34916 cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Archive Mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: agrant@runbox.com List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 16:36:26 -0000 Can someone tell me why all of a sudden I am getting old archived mail from at least three of the listserv mailing lists? The three I am sure of are (current, hardware, stable). I am getting mail from 2001 , 2002 and 2003 Has something broke? Thanks AL From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 24 16:38:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CADF016A4CE; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 16:38:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.nemschoff.com (smtp.Nemschoff.com [64.179.52.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B55143D48; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 16:38:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from MClark@Nemschoff.com) Received: from EMAILSERVER2.nemschoff.com ([10.10.11.20]) by smtp.nemschoff.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Fri, 24 Sep 2004 11:40:58 -0500 Received: by EMAILSERVER2.nemschoff.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 11:41:38 -0500 Message-ID: From: Michael Clark To: "'agrant@runbox.com'" , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 11:41:36 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Sep 2004 16:40:58.0887 (UTC) FILETIME=[45202170:01C4A255] cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Archive Mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 16:38:53 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: AL Grant [mailto:agrant@runbox.com] > Sent: Friday, September 24, 2004 11:36 AM > To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org > Subject: Archive Mail > > > Can someone tell me why all of a sudden I am getting old > archived mail > from at least three of the listserv mailing lists? > > The three I am sure of are (current, hardware, stable). > > I am getting mail from 2001 , 2002 and 2003 > > Has something broke? I am getting it as well. > > Thanks AL > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE: This electronic transmission, including all attachments, is directed in confidence solely to the person(s) to whom it is addressed, or an authorized recipient, and may not otherwise be distributed, copied or disclosed. The contents of the transmission may also be subject to intellectual property rights and all such rights are expressly claimed and are not waived. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by return electronic transmission and then immediately delete this transmission, including all attachments, without copying, distributing or disclosing same. From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 24 16:41:43 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DF8616A4CE for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 16:41:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from atlasta.net (mail.atlasta.net [209.246.234.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BE7C543D46 for ; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 16:41:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drais@atlasta.net) Received: (qmail 57861 invoked by uid 1012); 24 Sep 2004 16:41:41 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 24 Sep 2004 16:41:41 -0000 Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 09:41:41 -0700 (PDT) From: David Raistrick To: AL Grant In-Reply-To: <41544D07.8090202@runbox.com> Message-ID: References: <41544D07.8090202@runbox.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Archive Mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 16:41:43 -0000 On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, AL Grant wrote: > Can someone tell me why all of a sudden I am getting old archived mail > from at least three of the listserv mailing lists? ....someone's sending their mailbox to gmail. dwbear75@gmail.com aka david.bear@asu.edu specificly...but their script is borked. --- david raistrick http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html drais@atlasta.net http://www.expita.com/nomime.html From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 24 16:45:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC5916A4F1; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 16:45:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi (gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi [195.197.172.116]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82A8343D2F; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 16:45:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from djv@mbnet.fi) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (YYKCMXCIII.dsl.saunalahti.fi [62.142.74.94]) by gw02.mail.saunalahti.fi (Postfix) with ESMTP id 110F01E8C1; Fri, 24 Sep 2004 19:45:12 +0300 (EEST) Message-ID: <41544F1C.50201@mbnet.fi> Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 19:45:16 +0300 From: Tuomo Latto User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.86.1.0 X-Enigmail-Supports: pgp-inline, pgp-mime Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Archive Mail X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Sep 2004 16:45:36 -0000 Michael Clark wrote: >>Can someone tell me why all of a sudden I am getting old >>archived mail >>from at least three of the listserv mailing lists? >> >>The three I am sure of are (current, hardware, stable). >> >>I am getting mail from 2001 , 2002 and 2003 >> >>Has something broke? > > > I am getting it as well. Ditto. Only 7 mails so far but it's already annoying. -- Tuomo ... "Data! I thought you were dead!" "No, Sir. I rebooted." From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 25 06:11:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF53716A52C for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 06:11:16 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpclu-2.eunet.yu (smtpclu-2.eunet.yu [194.247.192.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97C7E43D31 for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 06:11:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kolicz@EUnet.yu) Received: from kolic.net (P-2.103.eunet.yu [213.240.2.103]) by smtpclu-2.eunet.yu (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i8P6BBEb018545 for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 08:11:11 +0200 Received: by kolic.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 784BD4292; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 08:07:55 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 08:07:55 +0200 From: Zoran Kolic To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040925060755.GA638@kolic.net> References: <20040924120101.609EA16A4D0@hub.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040924120101.609EA16A4D0@hub.freebsd.org> X-Virus-Scan: EUnet-AVAS-Milter X-AVAS-Virus-Status: clean X-Spam-Checker: EUnet-AVAS-Milter X-AVAS-Spam-Score: -2.2 Subject: Re: How to mount extra partition from a fixit disk X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 06:11:17 -0000 This is the very question my good friend had few days ago. He has another os, but anyway. The point is to find second machine, attach dead hdd as a second drive (it is not quite dead, if you see files?), try live system... Not the same scenario as yours, but could help. Why would you use inter- faces like usb or parralel? Or, maybe, approach it from first hdd? Best regards ZK From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 25 09:17:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC61C16A4CE; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 09:17:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD71843D53; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 09:17:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8P9H60A081037; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 18:47:06 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, stacey@vickiandstacey.com Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 18:46:47 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <20030107002259.1375e9ad.c.prevotaux@hexanet.fr> <1041896240.51041.164.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1041896240.51041.164.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart9965715.uxV7cUTeSr"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200409251847.04107.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 () IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.16 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) cc: stable@freebsd.org cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: dwbear75@gmail.com Subject: Re: Audio board [HELP] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 09:17:12 -0000 --nextPart9965715.uxV7cUTeSr Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, 7 Jan 2003 10:07, Stacey Roberts wrote: > Err., have you tried adding device pcm to the kernel and recompiling? > See the handbook > (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sound-setup) > for details on this procedure. Or just do kldload snd Then try=20 cat /dev/sndstat =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart9965715.uxV7cUTeSr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBVTeP5ZPcIHs/zowRAvyeAJ4p2IFaax1OAQgBMDek9LzLlQuMawCgmsvj 8jKmAAm30iwpITDHulRDfrg= =1KaD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart9965715.uxV7cUTeSr-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 25 09:17:11 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC61C16A4CE; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 09:17:11 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cain.gsoft.com.au (cain.gsoft.com.au [203.31.81.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD71843D53; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 09:17:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) Received: from inchoate.gsoft.com.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by cain.gsoft.com.au (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i8P9H60A081037; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 18:47:06 +0930 (CST) (envelope-from doconnor@gsoft.com.au) From: "Daniel O'Connor" To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, stacey@vickiandstacey.com Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 18:46:47 +0930 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <20030107002259.1375e9ad.c.prevotaux@hexanet.fr> <1041896240.51041.164.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1041896240.51041.164.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart9965715.uxV7cUTeSr"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200409251847.04107.doconnor@gsoft.com.au> X-Spam-Score: -2.5 () IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.16 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang) cc: stable@freebsd.org cc: questions@freebsd.org cc: dwbear75@gmail.com Subject: Re: Audio board [HELP] X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 09:17:12 -0000 --nextPart9965715.uxV7cUTeSr Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, 7 Jan 2003 10:07, Stacey Roberts wrote: > Err., have you tried adding device pcm to the kernel and recompiling? > See the handbook > (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sound-setup) > for details on this procedure. Or just do kldload snd Then try=20 cat /dev/sndstat =2D-=20 Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au "The nice thing about standards is that there are so many of them to choose from." -- Andrew Tanenbaum GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C --nextPart9965715.uxV7cUTeSr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBVTeP5ZPcIHs/zowRAvyeAJ4p2IFaax1OAQgBMDek9LzLlQuMawCgmsvj 8jKmAAm30iwpITDHulRDfrg= =1KaD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart9965715.uxV7cUTeSr-- From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 25 15:54:25 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89E7616A4CE for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 15:54:25 +0000 (GMT) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7825E43D1D for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 15:54:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ps@mu.org) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6F8005C9AB; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 08:54:25 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 08:54:25 -0700 From: Paul Saab To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040925155425.GA15039@elvis.mu.org> References: <20040917175831.GB18526@pir.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040917175831.GB18526@pir.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: supporting broadcom gig BCM5751 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 15:54:25 -0000 Can you try http://yogurt.org/FreeBSD/bge_5750.diff It got my 5751 working. Peter Radcliffe (pir@pir.net) wrote: > I'm trying to install a new dell machine at work but it's coming up > with an unknown internal gig ether card and it's stupidly fussy about > PCI cards (won't boot with random cards in it). > > The device is; 0x14e4 0x1677 which some searching tells me is a > broadcom BCM5751 gig ether card. > > Adding the device ids to if_bge.c and if_bgereg.h; > > #define BCOM_DEVICEID_BCM5751 0x1677 > > { BCOM_VENDORID, BCOM_DEVICEID_BCM5751, > "Broadcom BCM5751 Gigabit Ethernet" }, > > and PXE booting with the new kernel gives me; > > bge0: mem > 0xdfcf0000-0xdfcfffff irq 11 at device 0.0 on pci2 > NMI ISA a0, EISA ff > RAM parity error, likely hardware failure. > > Fatal trap 19: non-maskable interrupt trap while in kernel mode > instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc028a8cb > stack pointer = 0x10:0xc0821d4c > frame pointer = 0x10:0xc0821d54 > code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b > = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 > processor eflags = interrupt enabled, IOPL = 0 > current process = 0 (swapper) > interrupt mask = net tty bio cam > trap number = 19 > panic: non-maskable interrupt trap > > This doesn't happen with a default kernel (or my special build kernel > without the source patch). ANy hints or does this need real driver > support work ? > > P. > > -- > pir -- -ps From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 25 17:01:13 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA6DD16A4CE for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 17:01:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from moek.pir.net (moek.pir.net [130.64.1.215]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76B7043D45 for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 17:01:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pir@pir.net) Received: from pir by moek.pir.net with local (Exim) id 1CBFv6-00078q-Kd for freebsd-stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 13:01:12 -0400 Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 13:01:12 -0400 From: Peter Radcliffe To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20040925170112.GA26994@pir.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org References: <20040917175831.GB18526@pir.net> <20040925155425.GA15039@elvis.mu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040925155425.GA15039@elvis.mu.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2i X-fish: < X-Copy-On-Listmail: Please do NOT Cc: me on list mail. Subject: Re: supporting broadcom gig BCM5751 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 17:01:13 -0000 Paul Saab probably said: > Can you try http://yogurt.org/FreeBSD/bge_5750.diff > It got my 5751 working. Unfortunately the further problems I had involved not being able to get the PCI-extreme ATI graphics card working with XFree86 so the box became a windows machine and is in use, I can't test things on it anymore :/ P. -- pir From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 25 20:07:21 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A5E416A4CE; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 20:07:21 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cs1.cs.huji.ac.il (cs1.cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF30E43D3F; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 20:07:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il) Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32]) by cs1.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp id 1CBIpC-000KR0-F8; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 22:07:18 +0200 X-Mailer: exmh version 2.7.0 06/18/2004 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Paul Saab In-Reply-To: Message from Paul Saab of "Sat, 25 Sep 2004 08:54:25 MST." <20040925155425.GA15039@elvis.mu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 22:07:18 +0200 From: Danny Braniss Message-Id: <20040925200720.EF30E43D3F@mx1.FreeBSD.org> cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: supporting broadcom gig BCM5751 X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 20:07:21 -0000 > Can you try http://yogurt.org/FreeBSD/bge_5750.diff > > It got my 5751 working. it booted ok!, the real test will be tomorrow, (i can't move the rj45 from home :-) bge0: mem 0xdfcf0000-0xdfcfffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci2 miibus0: on bge0 ukphy0: on miibus0 ukphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, 1000baseT, 1000baseT-FDX, auto bge0: Ethernet address: 00:0f:1f:da:0e:64 and bge0: flags=8802 mtu 1500 options=1a ether 00:0f:1f:da:0e:64 media: Ethernet autoselect (none) status: no carrier btw, this is still a problem: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=68445 thanks, danny > > Peter Radcliffe (pir@pir.net) wrote: > > I'm trying to install a new dell machine at work but it's coming up > > with an unknown internal gig ether card and it's stupidly fussy about > > PCI cards (won't boot with random cards in it). > > > > The device is; 0x14e4 0x1677 which some searching tells me is a > > broadcom BCM5751 gig ether card. > > > > Adding the device ids to if_bge.c and if_bgereg.h; > > > > #define BCOM_DEVICEID_BCM5751 0x1677 > > > > { BCOM_VENDORID, BCOM_DEVICEID_BCM5751, > > "Broadcom BCM5751 Gigabit Ethernet" }, > > > > and PXE booting with the new kernel gives me; > > > > bge0: mem > > 0xdfcf0000-0xdfcfffff irq 11 at device 0.0 on pci2 > > NMI ISA a0, EISA ff > > RAM parity error, likely hardware failure. > > > > Fatal trap 19: non-maskable interrupt trap while in kernel mode > > instruction pointer = 0x8:0xc028a8cb > > stack pointer = 0x10:0xc0821d4c > > frame pointer = 0x10:0xc0821d54 > > code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b > > = DPL 0, pres 1, def32 1, gran 1 > > processor eflags = interrupt enabled, IOPL = 0 > > current process = 0 (swapper) > > interrupt mask = net tty bio cam > > trap number = 19 > > panic: non-maskable interrupt trap > > > > This doesn't happen with a default kernel (or my special build kernel > > without the source patch). ANy hints or does this need real driver > > support work ? > > > > P. > > > > -- > > pir > > -- > -ps > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 25 20:29:24 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6519716A4CE for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 20:29:24 +0000 (GMT) Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52B6C43D31 for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 20:29:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com) Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4502772DD4; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 13:29:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42D5972DCB; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 13:29:24 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 13:29:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eirik_=D8verby?= In-Reply-To: <5390CF52-0D22-11D9-862C-000D9335BCEC@anduin.net> Message-ID: <20040925132827.G65556@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <41519A92.3070503@anduin.net> <20040922191436.A36124@carver.gumbysoft.com> <5390CF52-0D22-11D9-862C-000D9335BCEC@anduin.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=X-UNKNOWN Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Obscure errors in dmsg, system instability X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 20:29:24 -0000 On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Eirik =D8verby wrote: > On 23. Sep 2004, at 04:15, Doug White wrote: > > > Is something sharing an interrupt with that device? > > > > PCI bus errors are generally Bad News .. either some device or the > > mobo is inroducing errors. > > Well.. Yes, there is some interrupt sharing. Relevant parts of dmsg: > > [ltning@carnen] ~$ dmesg | grep "irq 2" > IOAPIC #0 intpin 19 -> irq 2 > uhci0: port 0xd400-0xd41f irq > 2 at device 4.2 on pci0 > ahc0: port 0xd000-0xd0ff mem > 0xe2000000-0xe2000fff irq 2 at device 6.0 on pci0 > amr0: mem 0xe3000000-0xe300ffff irq 2 at device 9.1 > on pci0 Apparently one of these devices doesn't like getting an interrupt when there's no data pending. It might be a FreeBSD driver bug, but being a 3-way share it'll make it hard to untangle. > I don't like the fact that the LSI and the Adaptec are sharing IRQs, > given that the LSI is the main system drive controller (which is why I > don't use the Adaptec at all - and it cannot be disabled in BIOS I > think!)... > > I should perhaps try to reallocate some of the IRQs, but I don't really > have a clue how to do that, since I have no VGA in that box.. Ohwell, I > guess I just have to rip it open ;) Yah .. rearrange the cards in the slots and see what you can convince it to do. --=20 Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 25 20:31:22 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5916516A4CE for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 20:31:22 +0000 (GMT) Received: from carver.gumbysoft.com (carver.gumbysoft.com [66.220.23.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48AE443D3F for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 20:31:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwhite@gumbysoft.com) Received: by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3CED972DD4; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 13:31:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by carver.gumbysoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A8D972DCB; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 13:31:22 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 13:31:22 -0700 (PDT) From: Doug White To: Kenwey In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20040925133005.H65556@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How can I mount 2nd Hard disk (IDE) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 20:31:22 -0000 On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, Kenwey wrote: > I get a warning message when I boot my FreeBSD 5.1, it shows as follows: > > Detecting Primary Master ...WDC WD400JB-00ETA0 (40GB, running FreeBSD 5.1) > Detecting Primary Slave ... None > Detecting Secondary Master .WDC WD400BB-32CXA0 (40GB, /lib can't work well) > Detecting Secondary Slave ASUS CD-S520/A > SMART Failure Predicted on Primary Master: WDC WD400JB-00ETA0 > WARNING: Immediately backup your data and replace your hard disk drive > A failure may be imminent. > Press F1 to conitnue, DEL to enter SETUP > 02/16/2000-VT694X-P4V4X-00 This is from your BIOS. I believe the 'smartmon' port may be able to give you some additional information. > I turn off the machine, and pull it (WDC WD400JB-00ETA0) from > master and connect it to slave, then I do the following to backup : > > # mount -r /dev/ad2s1a /mnt > > it shows: incorrect super block I don't understand what you've done here. Please post 'dmesg | grep ad' in the new situation. -- Doug White | FreeBSD: The Power to Serve dwhite@gumbysoft.com | www.FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 25 20:42:19 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22B0C16A4CE for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 20:42:19 +0000 (GMT) Received: from anduin.net (anduin.net [212.12.46.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D156843D39 for ; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 20:42:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ltning@anduin.net) Received: from mailnull by anduin.net with dspam-scanned (Exim 4.42 (FreeBSD)) id 1CBJKi-000NfN-Gs for stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 22:39:52 +0200 Received: from mailnull by anduin.net with spamassassin-scanned (Exim 4.42 (FreeBSD)) id 1CBJKe-000Nf8-Cv for stable@freebsd.org; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 22:39:52 +0200 Received: from [217.8.136.185] (helo=[192.168.1.10]) by anduin.net with esmtp (Exim 4.42 (FreeBSD)) id 1CBJKe-000Nf5-8D; Sat, 25 Sep 2004 22:39:48 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20040925132827.G65556@carver.gumbysoft.com> References: <41519A92.3070503@anduin.net> <20040922191436.A36124@carver.gumbysoft.com> <5390CF52-0D22-11D9-862C-000D9335BCEC@anduin.net> <20040925132827.G65556@carver.gumbysoft.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Message-Id: <55A10978-0F33-11D9-A337-000D9335BCEC@anduin.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Eirik_=D8verby?= Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 22:41:53 +0200 To: Doug White X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.619) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on anduin.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.7 required=7.5 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=2.64 cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Obscure errors in dmsg, system instability X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Sep 2004 20:42:19 -0000 On 25. Sep 2004, at 22:29, Doug White wrote: > On Thu, 23 Sep 2004, [ISO-8859-1] Eirik =D8verby wrote: > >> On 23. Sep 2004, at 04:15, Doug White wrote: >> >>> Is something sharing an interrupt with that device? >>> >>> PCI bus errors are generally Bad News .. either some device or the >>> mobo is inroducing errors. >> >> Well.. Yes, there is some interrupt sharing. Relevant parts of dmsg: >> >> [ltning@carnen] ~$ dmesg | grep "irq 2" >> IOAPIC #0 intpin 19 -> irq 2 >> uhci0: port 0xd400-0xd41f=20= >> irq >> 2 at device 4.2 on pci0 >> ahc0: port 0xd000-0xd0ff mem >> 0xe2000000-0xe2000fff irq 2 at device 6.0 on pci0 >> amr0: mem 0xe3000000-0xe300ffff irq 2 at device=20= >> 9.1 >> on pci0 > > Apparently one of these devices doesn't like getting an interrupt when > there's no data pending. It might be a FreeBSD driver bug, but being a > 3-way share it'll make it hard to untangle. In that case, building a kernel without the adaptec driver might=20 actually resolve the problem for now? > >> I don't like the fact that the LSI and the Adaptec are sharing IRQs, >> given that the LSI is the main system drive controller (which is why = I >> don't use the Adaptec at all - and it cannot be disabled in BIOS I >> think!)... >> >> I should perhaps try to reallocate some of the IRQs, but I don't=20 >> really >> have a clue how to do that, since I have no VGA in that box.. Ohwell,=20= >> I >> guess I just have to rip it open ;) > > Yah .. rearrange the cards in the slots and see what you can convince=20= > it > to do. That's the plan. Thanks!! /Eirik