From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 20 03:13:31 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F0F016A4CE for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 03:13:31 +0000 (GMT) Received: from niobe.ijs.si (mail.ijs.si [193.2.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A49B343D48 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 03:13:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dejan.lesjak@ijs.si) Received: from localhost (localhost.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) by niobe.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id D54E11DD428 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 04:13:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from niobe.ijs.si ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (niobe.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 82836-08 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 04:13:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from metatron.ijs.si (metatron.ijs.si [193.2.4.152]) by niobe.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B07E1DD426 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 04:13:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from idefix.ijs.si (idefix.ijs.si [193.2.4.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by metatron.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 151351C00094 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 04:13:15 +0100 (CET) From: Dejan Lesjak To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 04:13:14 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502200413.15356.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ijs.si Subject: X.Org 6.8.2 - (most probably) final patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 03:13:31 -0000 A small patch was added to hopefully avoid theoretical problem with radeon driver. There were no troubles with previous one it seems, and there were a couple of positive responses. It seems there are no split distfiles, so a single bzipped tarball is still used, if they appear, the ports will be modified to use them, but as this would not change neither installed files, neither build process, this seems to be ready (after tests on ports cluster of course): http://www.ijs.si/~lesi/xorg/XO-682_3.diff Dejan From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 20 04:21:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36FBC16A4CF for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 04:21:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from cserv62.csub.edu (cserv62.csub.edu [136.168.10.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECDA643D31 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 04:21:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from raj@cserv62.csub.edu) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (adsl-64-160-204-39.dsl.bkfd14.pacbell.net [64.160.204.39]) by cserv62.csub.edu (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1K4LrQR088599; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 20:21:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from raj@cserv62.csub.edu) Message-ID: <4218106C.9010300@cserv62.csub.edu> Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 20:22:04 -0800 From: Russell Jackson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050129) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dejan Lesjak References: <200502200413.15356.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> In-Reply-To: <200502200413.15356.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X.Org 6.8.2 - (most probably) final patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 04:21:58 -0000 Dejan Lesjak wrote: > A small patch was added to hopefully avoid theoretical problem with radeon > driver. There were no troubles with previous one it seems, and there were a > couple of positive responses. It seems there are no split distfiles, so a > single bzipped tarball is still used, if they appear, the ports will be > modified to use them, but as this would not change neither installed files, > neither build process, this seems to be ready (after tests on ports cluster > of course): > http://www.ijs.si/~lesi/xorg/XO-682_3.diff > > Dejan > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-x11@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-x11-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" The xorg people seem to believe that nobody uses the split tarballs anymore because everyone is on broadband. You might want to explain the 'meta-port uber build space problem' to them. This is at least the impression I got while reading a recent thread on the xorg mailing list. -- Russell A. Jackson First Corollary of Taber's Second Law: Machines that piss people off get murdered. -- Pat Taber From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 20 05:02:28 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2865E16A4CE for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 05:02:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from niobe.ijs.si (mail.ijs.si [193.2.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C01943D49 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 05:02:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dejan.lesjak@ijs.si) Received: from localhost (localhost.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) by niobe.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D2351DD4DA; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 06:02:26 +0100 (CET) Received: from niobe.ijs.si ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (niobe.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 46572-13; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 06:02:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from metatron.ijs.si (metatron.ijs.si [193.2.4.152]) by niobe.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14C0D1DD56B; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 06:02:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from idefix.ijs.si (idefix.ijs.si [193.2.4.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by metatron.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E3881C00094; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 06:02:08 +0100 (CET) From: Dejan Lesjak To: Russell Jackson Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 06:02:07 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <200502200413.15356.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> <4218106C.9010300@cserv62.csub.edu> In-Reply-To: <4218106C.9010300@cserv62.csub.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502200602.08082.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ijs.si cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X.Org 6.8.2 - (most probably) final patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 05:02:28 -0000 On Sunday 20 of February 2005 05:22, Russell Jackson wrote: > Dejan Lesjak wrote: > > A small patch was added to hopefully avoid theoretical problem with > > radeon driver. There were no troubles with previous one it seems, and > > there were a couple of positive responses. It seems there are no split > > distfiles, so a single bzipped tarball is still used, if they appear, the > > ports will be modified to use them, but as this would not change neither > > installed files, neither build process, this seems to be ready (after > > tests on ports cluster of course): > > http://www.ijs.si/~lesi/xorg/XO-682_3.diff > > > > Dejan > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-x11@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11 > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-x11-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > The xorg people seem to believe that nobody uses the split tarballs > anymore because everyone is on broadband. You might want to explain the > 'meta-port uber build space problem' to them. This is at least the > impression I got while reading a recent thread on the xorg mailing list. Problem of this sort was already pointed out here: http://lists.freedesktop.org/pipermail/xorg/2005-February/006260.html (And I've mailed question a couple days later that that.) On the mirrors there are README files that say split files will be available. They may or may not at one time been put here: http://xorg.freedesktop.org/X11R6.8.2/src/ but while links are there, the files themselves are not. About the "uber build space": this should only be a problem if one is building meta port from scratch as opposed to upgrading. That would hopefully mean that there is enough space still available (as this would be a fresh install and all), so I hope this is not a horrible problem. If however it proves to be difficult, we can still untar a distfile only partially. This would not change the build or contents of installed packages, so it wouldn't affect results of ports cluster tests which need to be run sooner rather than later in order to commit the upgrade in time for ports freeze for FreeBSD 5.4. So if anybody has concerns about build space for building meta-port from scratch, do please yell and we'll try to shrink it :) (I'll ask again later and also on ports@ if the split distfiles are still not available at that time). Dejan From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 20 09:10:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F01CD16A4DB for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 09:10:07 +0000 (GMT) Received: from leguin.anholt.net (69-30-77-85.dq1sn.easystreet.com [69.30.77.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C02F43D54 for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 09:10:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eta@lclark.edu) Received: from leguin.anholt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by leguin.anholt.net (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1K99tDd002313; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 01:09:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eta@lclark.edu) Received: (from anholt@localhost) by leguin.anholt.net (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j1K99sfv002311; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 01:09:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eta@lclark.edu) X-Authentication-Warning: leguin.anholt.net: anholt set sender to eta@lclark.edu using -f From: Eric Anholt To: Dejan Lesjak In-Reply-To: <200502200602.08082.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> References: <200502200413.15356.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> <4218106C.9010300@cserv62.csub.edu> <200502200602.08082.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 01:09:53 -0800 Message-Id: <1108890593.909.13.camel@leguin> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org cc: Russell Jackson Subject: Re: X.Org 6.8.2 - (most probably) final patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 09:10:08 -0000 On Sun, 2005-02-20 at 06:02 +0100, Dejan Lesjak wrote: > On Sunday 20 of February 2005 05:22, Russell Jackson wrote: > > Dejan Lesjak wrote: > > > A small patch was added to hopefully avoid theoretical problem with > > > radeon driver. There were no troubles with previous one it seems, and > > > there were a couple of positive responses. It seems there are no split > > > distfiles, so a single bzipped tarball is still used, if they appear, the > > > ports will be modified to use them, but as this would not change neither > > > installed files, neither build process, this seems to be ready (after > > > tests on ports cluster of course): > > > http://www.ijs.si/~lesi/xorg/XO-682_3.diff > > > > > > Dejan > > > _______________________________________________ > > > freebsd-x11@freebsd.org mailing list > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11 > > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-x11-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > The xorg people seem to believe that nobody uses the split tarballs > > anymore because everyone is on broadband. You might want to explain the > > 'meta-port uber build space problem' to them. This is at least the > > impression I got while reading a recent thread on the xorg mailing list. > > Problem of this sort was already pointed out here: > http://lists.freedesktop.org/pipermail/xorg/2005-February/006260.html > (And I've mailed question a couple days later that that.) On the mirrors there > are README files that say split files will be available. They may or may not > at one time been put here: > http://xorg.freedesktop.org/X11R6.8.2/src/ > but while links are there, the files themselves are not. > About the "uber build space": this should only be a problem if one is building > meta port from scratch as opposed to upgrading. That would hopefully mean > that there is enough space still available (as this would be a fresh install > and all), so I hope this is not a horrible problem. If however it proves to > be difficult, we can still untar a distfile only partially. This would not > change the build or contents of installed packages, so it wouldn't affect > results of ports cluster tests which need to be run sooner rather than later > in order to commit the upgrade in time for ports freeze for FreeBSD 5.4. > So if anybody has concerns about build space for building meta-port from > scratch, do please yell and we'll try to shrink it :) > (I'll ask again later and also on ports@ if the split distfiles are still not > available at that time). Earlier today I sent an email to Roland, who was the RW for 6.8.2, asking for split tarballs. However, as everyone should be using portupgrade, the build space shouldn't be a problem, right? (heh) -- Eric Anholt eta@lclark.edu http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ anholt@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 20 15:52:08 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 607E016A4CE for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 15:52:08 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mindfields.energyhq.es.eu.org (73.Red-213-97-200.pooles.rima-tde.net [213.97.200.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B5B943D2F for ; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 15:52:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org) Received: from scienide.energyhq.es.eu.org (scienide.energyhq.es.eu.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f01:198:210:4bff:fe3d:e256]) by mindfields.energyhq.es.eu.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 468F3362ED; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 16:52:05 +0100 (CET) Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 16:51:19 +0100 From: Miguel Mendez To: Dejan Lesjak Message-Id: <20050220165119.38f1bf33.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org> In-Reply-To: <200502200413.15356.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> References: <200502200413.15356.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 1.9.1 (GTK+ 2.4.14; i386-portbld-freebsd5.3) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X.Org 6.8.2 - (most probably) final patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 15:52:08 -0000 On Sun, 20 Feb 2005 04:13:14 +0100 Dejan Lesjak wrote: > A small patch was added to hopefully avoid theoretical problem with > radeon driver. There were no troubles with previous one it seems, and > > there were a couple of positive responses. It seems there are no > split distfiles, so a single bzipped tarball is still used, if they > appear, the ports will be modified to use them, but as this would not > > change neither installed files, neither build process, this seems to > be ready (after tests on ports cluster of course): > http://www.ijs.si/~lesi/xorg/XO-682_3.diff I've upgraded my box to 6.8.2 and it works fine, although DRI still hangs the machine (it worked with 6.7 and DRI 5.x but not on 6.8+ with DRI 6.x). Guess I'll have to give up on bzflag for now :) Cheers, -- Miguel Mendez http://www.energyhq.es.eu.org PGP Key: 0xDC8514F1 From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 21 01:44:56 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65E8316A4CE for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 01:44:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.199.47.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2291643D46 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 01:44:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 052A1519F0; Sun, 20 Feb 2005 17:44:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 20 Feb 2005 17:44:54 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: x11@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20050221014454.GA55172@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: NO_LATEST_LINK in imake-6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 01:44:56 -0000 --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Should the NO_LATEST_LINK in devel/imake-6 be removed? It's not going to conflict with imake-4 since only one of those packages is built on any given branch. kris --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCGT0WWry0BWjoQKURAtb1AKDKAEi02VP4HX2Iy3ZWVVVuZ0b5nACeJZMV oWaIImfXxbm4RGXPxjnLb+Q= =ya6Z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --YZ5djTAD1cGYuMQK-- From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 21 06:54:09 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F5F16A4CE; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 06:54:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (aldan.algebra.com [216.254.65.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EACA43D5C; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 06:54:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from aldan.algebra.com (mi@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1L6s0NQ035966 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 21 Feb 2005 01:54:00 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by aldan.algebra.com (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j1L6rxl8035965; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 01:53:59 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi+kde@aldan.algebra.com) From: Mikhail Teterin To: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org, acardenas@bsdperu.org Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 01:53:58 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7whJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli" cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org cc: fxkuehl@gmx.de Subject: Re: ports/76257: nvidia_driver breaks xorg-clients build X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 06:54:10 -0000 [CC-ing the author of xdriinfo] Felix, please, take a look at: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/76257 The patch is wrong -- the program compiles, but does not work (``libgGL is too old''). The problem is, NVidia's GLX-implementation is version 1.3, while XOrg expects (and provides) 1.4. However, it may be possible to obtain the information, which the xdriinfo.c is trying to obtain with these two glXGetProcAddress-calls, using glXGetProcAddressARB or some other pre-GLX_1_4 method. Then we can have xdriinfo, which works with all of GL implementations available for FreeBSD. Finally, what's in xdriinfo, that's not in glxinfo? -mi From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 21 11:01:58 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D92B116A4DE for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:01:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCDB343D1D for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:01:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1LB1wcr034455 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:01:58 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Received: (from peter@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j1LB1vv4034449 for freebsd-x11@freebsd.org; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:01:57 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:01:57 GMT Message-Id: <200502211101.j1LB1vv4034449@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: peter set sender to owner-bugmaster@freebsd.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: Current problem reports assigned to you X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:01:59 -0000 Current FreeBSD problem reports Critical problems Serious problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o [2001/11/20] ports/32121 x11 XFree86-4-Server: xf86cfg 4.1.0 writes ba f [2004/07/02] ports/68599 x11 XFree86 in realloc(): error: allocation f o [2004/07/28] ports/69723 x11 4.10 update or install fails when X11 inc f [2004/08/07] ports/70139 x11 xorg-server 6.7: segfault reloading ddc m o [2004/08/11] ports/70317 x11 xvideo problems using XFree86-4.4.0 o [2004/11/22] ports/74265 x11 XFree86 Version 4.4.0 with KDE 3.1 freeze o [2004/12/06] ports/74757 x11 XFree86 4.4/Xorg 6.7.0 i810 problem with a [2005/02/07] ports/77217 x11 x11-servers/xorg-server has keyboard prob 8 problems total. Non-critical problems S Submitted Tracker Resp. Description ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- f [2003/11/15] ports/59297 x11 RADEON 7500 Warning message o [2004/05/11] ports/66511 x11 xdm xlogin*background color issue o [2004/09/14] ports/71724 x11 x11/XFree86-4-clients: luit does not reco o [2004/10/22] ports/73009 x11 5.3-RC1 ports refer to XF86Config - shoul o [2004/11/09] ports/73743 x11 XOrg/XFree xauth add/startx problem f [2004/11/21] ports/74190 x11 [PATCH] x11/XFree86-aoutlibs un-BROKEN on 6 problems total. From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 21 11:33:01 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9C9016A4CF for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:33:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E34D43D54 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:33:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fxkuehl@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 21 Feb 2005 11:32:59 -0000 Received: from trabant.pdv.cs.tu-berlin.de (EHLO trabant) (130.149.24.4) by mail.gmx.net (mp012) with SMTP; 21 Feb 2005 12:32:59 +0100 X-Authenticated: #7318305 Received: from trabant ([127.0.0.1] ident=felix) by trabant with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1D3Bqe-0000vD-00; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:35:32 +0100 From: Felix =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=FChling?= To: Mikhail Teterin In-Reply-To: <200502210153.59048@aldan> References: <200502210153.59048@aldan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:35:30 +0100 Message-Id: <1108985730.3418.21.camel@trabant> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org cc: acardenas@bsdperu.org Subject: Re: ports/76257: nvidia_driver breaks xorg-clients build X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:33:01 -0000 [ Reply-to-all this time ... ] Am Montag, den 21.02.2005, 01:53 -0500 schrieb Mikhail Teterin: > [CC-ing the author of xdriinfo] >=20 > Felix, please, take a look at: >=20 > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/76257 >=20 > The patch is wrong -- the program compiles, but does > not work (``libgGL is too old''). That's because xdriinfo relies on implementation-specific features of Xorg's libGL. See below for more details. >=20 > The problem is, NVidia's GLX-implementation is version > 1.3, while XOrg expects (and provides) 1.4. >=20 > However, it may be possible to obtain the information, > which the xdriinfo.c is trying to obtain with these two > glXGetProcAddress-calls, using glXGetProcAddressARB or > some other pre-GLX_1_4 method. If I use glXProcAddressARB with the GLX implementation from Xorg I get this: xdriinfo.c: In Funktion =BBmain=AB: xdriinfo.c:60: Warnung: implicit declaration of function `glXGetProcAddressARB' Unless someone shows me a good way to find out which version is available at build time, I'm not going change this in Xorg CVS. >=20 > Then we can have xdriinfo, which works with all of GL > implementations available for FreeBSD. >=20 > Finally, what's in xdriinfo, that's not in glxinfo? xdriinfo has a completely different purpose. It is used to find all direct rendering-capable screens and extract XML documents describing configuration options from the driver binaries. For this purpose it uses some implementation-specific functions of libGL (it uses glXGetProcAddress to find these functions). Since NVidia has its own libGL, xdriinfo can't do anything useful with NVidia's libGL. One more reason for me, not to care too much about NVidia. >=20 > -mi >=20 Regards, Felix --=20 | Felix K=FChling http://fxk.de.vu | | PGP Fingerprint: 6A3C 9566 5B30 DDED 73C3 B152 151C 5CC1 D888 E595 | From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 21 12:12:00 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1A5F16A4CE for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:12:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp818.mail.sc5.yahoo.com (smtp818.mail.sc5.yahoo.com [66.163.170.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 526ED43D54 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:12:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from noackjr@alumni.rice.edu) Received: from unknown (HELO optimator.noacks.org) (noacks@swbell.net@70.240.177.173 with login) by smtp818.mail.sc5.yahoo.com with SMTP; 21 Feb 2005 12:11:59 -0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by optimator.noacks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CB276189; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 06:11:58 -0600 (CST) Received: from optimator.noacks.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (optimator.noacks.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 04546-11; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 06:11:54 -0600 (CST) Received: from compgeek.noacks.org (compgeek [192.168.1.10]) by optimator.noacks.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12B6B615D; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 06:11:54 -0600 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by compgeek.noacks.org (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1LCBqua033655; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 06:11:52 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from noackjr@alumni.rice.edu) Message-ID: <4219D008.6030107@alumni.rice.edu> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 06:11:52 -0600 From: Jon Noack User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050202) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at noacks.org Subject: Re: X.Org 6.8.2 - (most probably) final patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: noackjr@alumni.rice.edu List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 12:12:00 -0000 Eric Anholt wrote: > On Sun, 2005-02-20 at 06:02 +0100, Dejan Lesjak wrote: >> On Sunday 20 of February 2005 05:22, Russell Jackson wrote: >>> The xorg people seem to believe that nobody uses the split tarballs >>> anymore because everyone is on broadband. You might want to explain the >>> 'meta-port uber build space problem' to them. This is at least the >>> impression I got while reading a recent thread on the xorg mailing list. >> >> Problem of this sort was already pointed out here: >> http://lists.freedesktop.org/pipermail/xorg/2005-February/006260.html >> (And I've mailed question a couple days later that that.) On the mirrors there >> are README files that say split files will be available. They may or may not >> at one time been put here: >> http://xorg.freedesktop.org/X11R6.8.2/src/ >> but while links are there, the files themselves are not. >> About the "uber build space": this should only be a problem if one is building >> meta port from scratch as opposed to upgrading. That would hopefully mean >> that there is enough space still available (as this would be a fresh install >> and all), so I hope this is not a horrible problem. If however it proves to >> be difficult, we can still untar a distfile only partially. This would not >> change the build or contents of installed packages, so it wouldn't affect >> results of ports cluster tests which need to be run sooner rather than later >> in order to commit the upgrade in time for ports freeze for FreeBSD 5.4. >> So if anybody has concerns about build space for building meta-port from >> scratch, do please yell and we'll try to shrink it :) >> (I'll ask again later and also on ports@ if the split distfiles are still not >> available at that time). > > Earlier today I sent an email to Roland, who was the RW for 6.8.2, > asking for split tarballs. However, as everyone should be using > portupgrade, the build space shouldn't be a problem, right? (heh) The build space is not a big deal to me; my machines have adequate free space to handle it. However, it's not fun to extract the full tarball on older/slower machines. Having to do it a 17 times is downright painful. Using tar exclusions doesn't solve the speed issue, because the tarball still has to be decompressed and searched. For example, let's exclude every subdirectory in the tarball (leaving only the files in xc/) and compare the time and space needed to a full extraction on my dual PentiumIII 933MHz w/ 2GB RAM (NOTE: this is using bsdtar on 5.3-STABLE. I also tried gtar and the results were similar): $ cat exclusions xc/CVS* xc/config* xc/doc* xc/exports* xc/extras* xc/font* xc/include* xc/lib* xc/nls* xc/programs* xc/util* $ cat X11R6.8.2-src.tar.bz2 > /dev/null $ time tar -X exclusions -xf X11R6.8.2-src.tar.bz2 real 0m59.926s user 0m58.741s sys 0m0.841s $ du -d 1 xc 506 xc $ rm -rf xc/ $ time tar -xf X11R6.8.2-src.tar.bz2 real 1m30.121s user 1m0.018s sys 0m14.661s $ du -d 1 xc 1824 xc/nls 82080 xc/programs 21208 xc/lib 26770 xc/doc 2100 xc/config 46422 xc/extras 12 xc/CVS 103872 xc/fonts 1888 xc/include 110 xc/util 286792 xc $ Check out the user times; there are almost identical. As one would expect, the full extract takes longer because the data has to be written to disk (see sys time). My point is that we can easily resolve the build space issue with exclusions, but there remains an issue with CPU usage. Even using exclusions, my machine would still spend at least 17 minutes JUST EXTRACTING THE TARBALL when installing or upgrading X.Org. That's a lot. If at all possible, it would be great if we could convince the X.Org folks to bring back the split tarballs... Jon From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 21 16:51:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99FD116A4CE; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 16:51:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from corbulon.video-collage.com (static-151-204-231-237.bos.east.verizon.net [151.204.231.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97CB743D4C; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 16:51:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from vaio.virtual-estates.net (aldan.algebra.com [216.254.65.224]) j1LGpBQk086453 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:51:12 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from vaio.virtual-estates.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) j1LGp5EU001394; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:51:05 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by vaio.virtual-estates.net (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j1LGp57P001393; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:51:05 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi@aldan.algebra.com) X-Authentication-Warning: vaio.virtual-estates.net: mi set sender to mi@aldan.algebra.com using -f From: "Mikhail T." To: Felix =?utf-8?q?K=C3=BChling?= Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:51:04 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <200502210153.59048@aldan> <1108985730.3418.21.camel@trabant> In-Reply-To: <1108985730.3418.21.camel@trabant> X-Face: %UW#n0|w>ydeGt/b@1-.UFP=K^~-:0f#O:D7whJ5G_<5143Bb3kOIs9XpX+"V+~$adGP:J|SLieM31VIhqXeLBli"<=?utf-8?q?kcG=5EEOVihy+z3/UR=7B6SCQ=0A?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502211151.05030@Misha> X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040615, clamav-milter version 0.73a on corbulon.video-collage.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.43 cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org cc: acardenas@bsdperu.org cc: Mikhail Teterin Subject: Re: ports/76257: nvidia_driver breaks xorg-clients build X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 16:51:42 -0000 = Unless someone shows me a good way to find out which version is = available at build time, I'm not going change this in Xorg CVS. This is the simplest of all for you to do. The glXGetProcAddress function appears only in the 1.4 version of GLX specifications. The headers supplied with NVidia's implementation #define GLX_VERSION_1_1, GLX_VERSION_1_2, and GLX_VERSION_1_3. Xorg's implementation defines GLX_VERSION_1_4 in addition to those three. = For this purpose it uses some implementation-specific functions of = libGL (it uses glXGetProcAddress to find these functions). Since = NVidia has its own libGL, xdriinfo can't do anything useful with = NVidia's libGL. One more reason for me, not to care too much about = NVidia. NVidia's seems a perfectly good implementation of GLX-1.3. Your program currently requires the 1.4 conformance (the only program in Xorg distribution today). If the 1.4-features are essential to your program, we have to find a way to disable building it in some cases. If, on the other hand, your program can be modified to provide the same functionality with earlier GLX, please, consider doing so. Thanks, -mi P.S. Alexey! nvidia-driver port should install the headers too, in addition to libraries... From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 21 18:36:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD0ED16A4CE for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 18:36:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mg3.xecu.net (mg3.xecu.net [216.127.136.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57CBB43D5C for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 18:36:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from smickey@mynetsetup.com) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by mg3.xecu.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CE913D9BE5 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 13:36:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from mg3.xecu.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mg3.xecu.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 53666-07 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 13:36:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.70.60] (24-53-152-74.chvlva.adelphia.net [24.53.152.74]) by mg3.xecu.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 956B23D9BD0 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 13:36:24 -0500 (EST) From: Shaun Mickey To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org User-Agent: KMail/1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200503211336.27906.smickey@mynetsetup.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at xecu.net Subject: xorg corruption X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 18:36:29 -0000 X-Original-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2005 13:36:27 -0500 X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 18:36:29 -0000 First off i have FreeBSD 5.3 stable on a dell latitude c600 (p3 750 512mb ram) i have xorg installed and have had both Gnome and KDE installed (not at the same time though). Every time i go to start kde or gnome after a shutdown, (using halt, shutdown, or reboot) the screen that's supposed to be black and white checkered with the X cursor is a corrupted version of a screenshot, or horizontal pink and gray bars. I believe the processor is spiked as well because i can move the mouse but there is a 1-2 second delay before it moves and it jumps, it doesn't refresh smoothly. About 5 minutes after i started xorg i am logged into gnome and can slowly logout. After about another 3-5 minutes i'm logged out. Now i can go startx again and it starts perfectly and i'm logged in in < 2 minutes. I've installed freebsd several times, always with the same options (first two times i installed gnome, last time i installed kde) It never fails to happen after a reboot. Here are the vitals, let me know if anything else is needed. Thanks in Advance, Shaun XXXXXXXXXXXXXX Systems Administrator 270net Technologies XXXXXXXXXXXXXX ~/.xinitrc: exec startkde /etc/xorg.conf: Section "ServerLayout" Identifier "X.org Configured" Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0 InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer" InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard" EndSection Section "Files" RgbPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" ModulePath "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" EndSection Section "Module" Load "dbe" Load "dri" Load "extmod" Load "glx" Load "record" Load "xtrap" Load "freetype" Load "speedo" Load "type1" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Keyboard0" Driver "keyboard" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Mouse0" Driver "mouse" Option "Protocol" "auto" Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" EndSection Section "Monitor" Identifier "Monitor0" VendorName "Monitor Vendor" ModelName "Monitor Model" HorizSync 40-48 EndSection Section "Device" ### Available Driver options are:- ### Values: : integer, : float, : "True"/"False", ### : "String", : " Hz/kHz/MHz" ### [arg]: arg optional Identifier "Card0" Driver "ati" VendorName "ATI Technologies Inc" BoardName "Rage Mobility M3 AGP 2x" BusID "PCI:1:0:0" EndSection Section "Screen" Identifier "Screen0" Device "Card0" Monitor "Monitor0" SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 1 EndSubSection SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 4 EndSubSection SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 8 EndSubSection SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 15 EndSubSection SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 16 EndSubSection SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 24 EndSubSection EndSection From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 21 20:33:38 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4F3616A4CE for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 20:33:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from niobe.ijs.si (mail.ijs.si [193.2.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38EB943D4C for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 20:33:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dejan.lesjak@ijs.si) Received: from localhost (localhost.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) by niobe.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 664071DD4DA; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:33:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from niobe.ijs.si ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (niobe.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 77729-01; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:33:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from metatron.ijs.si (metatron.ijs.si [193.2.4.152]) by niobe.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 118E31DD5FC; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:33:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from idefix.ijs.si (idefix.ijs.si [193.2.4.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by metatron.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2718E1C00094; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:33:19 +0100 (CET) From: Dejan Lesjak To: noackjr@alumni.rice.edu Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:33:19 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <4219D008.6030107@alumni.rice.edu> In-Reply-To: <4219D008.6030107@alumni.rice.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502212133.19515.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ijs.si cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X.Org 6.8.2 - (most probably) final patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 20:33:38 -0000 On Monday 21 of February 2005 13:11, Jon Noack wrote: > The build space is not a big deal to me; my machines have adequate free > space to handle it. However, it's not fun to extract the full tarball > on older/slower machines. Having to do it a 17 times is downright > painful. Using tar exclusions doesn't solve the speed issue, because > the tarball still has to be decompressed and searched. For example, > let's exclude every subdirectory in the tarball (leaving only the files > in xc/) and compare the time and space needed to a full extraction on my > dual PentiumIII 933MHz w/ 2GB RAM (NOTE: this is using bsdtar on > 5.3-STABLE. I also tried gtar and the results were similar): [snip results] > Check out the user times; there are almost identical. As one would > expect, the full extract takes longer because the data has to be written > to disk (see sys time). Indeed they would be identical because of the way tar works - with cpio things would be different. What could help here is if we switch from bzipped tarball to gzipped one. This would speed extraction at the expense of larger distfile (with of course more bandwidth needed to fetch). > My point is that we can easily resolve the build space issue with > exclusions, but there remains an issue with CPU usage. Even using > exclusions, my machine would still spend at least 17 minutes JUST > EXTRACTING THE TARBALL when installing or upgrading X.Org. That's a > lot. If at all possible, it would be great if we could convince the > X.Org folks to bring back the split tarballs... This should also be better with gzipped vs bzipped tarballs. I don't have any preference here. I'd like to know what we should be more concerned about here - size of distfile or the speed of extraction. Please keep in mind though that some people pay internet access by used bandwidth (and it's not cheap in some cases). Here are both sizes for comparison: lesi@idefix:~/tmp/distfiles% ll total 98176 -rw-r--r-- 1 lesi lesi 44371402 Feb 16 15:50 X11R6.8.2-src.tar.bz2 -rw-r--r-- 1 lesi lesi 56047552 Feb 9 20:13 X11R6.8.2-src.tar.gz lesi@idefix:~/tmp/distfiles% ll -h total 98176 -rw-r--r-- 1 lesi lesi 42M Feb 16 15:50 X11R6.8.2-src.tar.bz2 -rw-r--r-- 1 lesi lesi 53M Feb 9 20:13 X11R6.8.2-src.tar.gz The X.Org folks have a mailing list: http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg to where these concerns should probably be directed. As I've said these concerns were already pointed out at that list and the README files on ftp.x.org and mirrors still imply that split distfiles are comming. So, having no announcement or some kind of mail to say otherwise I'm still expecting them :) Dejan From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 21 21:04:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B68B116A4D0 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:04:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from niobe.ijs.si (mail.ijs.si [193.2.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEEF443D49 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:04:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dejan.lesjak@ijs.si) Received: from localhost (localhost.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) by niobe.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CC041DD508; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:04:12 +0100 (CET) Received: from niobe.ijs.si ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (niobe.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 80289-01; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:03:56 +0100 (CET) Received: from metatron.ijs.si (metatron.ijs.si [193.2.4.152]) by niobe.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85EFF1DD4DA; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:03:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from idefix.ijs.si (idefix.ijs.si [193.2.4.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by metatron.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 240691C00094; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:03:53 +0100 (CET) From: Dejan Lesjak To: NAKAJI Hiroyuki Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:03:53 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <200502131351.46760.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> <86vf8revvq.fsf@xa12.heimat.gr.jp> In-Reply-To: <86vf8revvq.fsf@xa12.heimat.gr.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502212203.53758.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ijs.si cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: X.Org 6.8.2 ports - take 1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:04:13 -0000 On Thursday 17 of February 2005 03:57, NAKAJI Hiroyuki wrote: > >>>>> In <200502131351.46760.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> > >>>>> Dejan Lesjak wrote: > > > > The diff to current ports tree: > > http://www.ijs.si/~lesi/xorg/XO-682_2.diff > > ports/77217 is also fixed. Thanks! Ah, yes I should have mentioned this. It's also filed to X.Org bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2561 Thanks for testing! Dejan From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 21 21:06:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85E3B16A524; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:06:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5781E43D53; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:06:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lesi@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (lesi@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1LL6qjn017587; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:06:52 GMT (envelope-from lesi@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from lesi@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id j1LL6qek017583; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:06:52 GMT (envelope-from lesi) Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:06:52 GMT From: Dejan Lesjak Message-Id: <200502212106.j1LL6qek017583@freefall.freebsd.org> To: nakaji@jp.freebsd.org, lesi@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/77217: x11-servers/xorg-server has keyboard problem on pc98 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:06:52 -0000 Synopsis: x11-servers/xorg-server has keyboard problem on pc98 State-Changed-From-To: analyzed->suspended State-Changed-By: lesi State-Changed-When: Mon Feb 21 21:05:05 GMT 2005 State-Changed-Why: Patch has been added to xorg-* ports upgrade, so suspending this PR untill upgrade is commited. Bugzilla entries of upstreams for reference: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2561 http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1549 http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=77217 From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 21 21:30:39 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA57C16A4CE for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:30:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 988C943D31 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:30:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fxkuehl@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 21 Feb 2005 21:30:35 -0000 Received: from dialin-212-144-026-036.arcor-ip.net (EHLO trabant) (212.144.26.36) by mail.gmx.net (mp002) with SMTP; 21 Feb 2005 22:30:35 +0100 X-Authenticated: #7318305 Received: from trabant ([127.0.0.1] ident=felix) by trabant with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1D3LAx-0000t9-00; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:33:07 +0100 From: Felix =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=FChling?= To: "Mikhail T." In-Reply-To: <200502211151.05030@Misha> References: <200502210153.59048@aldan> <1108985730.3418.21.camel@trabant> <200502211151.05030@Misha> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:33:06 +0100 Message-Id: <1109021586.3355.10.camel@trabant> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org cc: acardenas@bsdperu.org cc: Mikhail Teterin Subject: Re: ports/76257: nvidia_driver breaks xorg-clients build X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:30:40 -0000 Am Montag, den 21.02.2005, 11:51 -0500 schrieb Mikhail T.: > =3D Unless someone shows me a good way to find out which version is > =3D available at build time, I'm not going change this in Xorg CVS. >=20 > This is the simplest of all for you to do. The glXGetProcAddress > function appears only in the 1.4 version of GLX specifications. The > headers supplied with NVidia's implementation #define GLX_VERSION_1_1, > GLX_VERSION_1_2, and GLX_VERSION_1_3. >=20 > Xorg's implementation defines GLX_VERSION_1_4 in addition to those > three. Ok, thanks for the pointer. I'll do that then. >=20 > =3D For this purpose it uses some implementation-specific functions of > =3D libGL (it uses glXGetProcAddress to find these functions). Since > =3D NVidia has its own libGL, xdriinfo can't do anything useful with > =3D NVidia's libGL. One more reason for me, not to care too much about > =3D NVidia. >=20 > NVidia's seems a perfectly good implementation of GLX-1.3.=20 I'm not questioning that. > Your program > currently requires the 1.4 conformance (the only program in Xorg > distribution today). If the 1.4-features are essential to your program, > we have to find a way to disable building it in some cases. If, on > the other hand, your program can be modified to provide the same > functionality with earlier GLX, please, consider doing so. Thanks, It doesn't need GLX 1.4 features, but it requires non-standard features which are only available in the DRI libGL (from Xorg, not sure if XFree86 supports this too). By using glXGetProcAddress[ARB] it can detect this functionality at run-time. Therefore, I can make xdriinfo build with NVidia's (or any other older) GLX implementation. But it will not be useful. Of course, if NVidia ever chooses to adopt the DRI configuration infrastructure, that may change. However, AFAIK they have there own configuration mechanism. I did not consider other libGL implementations when I wrote xdriinfo. It may be a good idea to change the message "libGL is too old." to something more generic, like "libGL does not support the DRI configuration infrastructure." >=20 > -mi >=20 > P.S. Alexey! nvidia-driver port should install the headers too, in > addition to libraries... Regards, Felix --=20 | Felix K=FChling http://fxk.de.vu | | PGP Fingerprint: 6A3C 9566 5B30 DDED 73C3 B152 151C 5CC1 D888 E595 | From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 21 21:53:39 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C22716A4CE for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:53:39 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id ED54F43D46 for ; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:53:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fxkuehl@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 21 Feb 2005 21:53:35 -0000 Received: from dialin-212-144-026-036.arcor-ip.net (EHLO trabant) (212.144.26.36) by mail.gmx.net (mp009) with SMTP; 21 Feb 2005 22:53:35 +0100 X-Authenticated: #7318305 Received: from trabant ([127.0.0.1] ident=felix) by trabant with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1D3LX3-0000uf-00; Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:55:57 +0100 From: Felix =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=FChling?= To: "Mikhail T." In-Reply-To: <200502211151.05030@Misha> References: <200502210153.59048@aldan> <1108985730.3418.21.camel@trabant> <200502211151.05030@Misha> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-9+Xcj2feZsEstRLVbofT" Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:55:56 +0100 Message-Id: <1109022957.3355.15.camel@trabant> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org cc: acardenas@bsdperu.org Subject: Re: ports/76257: nvidia_driver breaks xorg-clients build X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:53:39 -0000 --=-9+Xcj2feZsEstRLVbofT Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Could you try if the attached patch against xdriinfo.c works with NVidia's GLX? If it does, then I'll commit this to Xorg CVS. Regards, Felix Am Montag, den 21.02.2005, 11:51 -0500 schrieb Mikhail T.: [snip] --=20 | Felix K=FChling http://fxk.de.vu | | PGP Fingerprint: 6A3C 9566 5B30 DDED 73C3 B152 151C 5CC1 D888 E595 | --=-9+Xcj2feZsEstRLVbofT Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=xdriinfo_oldglx.diff Content-Type: text/x-patch; name=xdriinfo_oldglx.diff; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --- ./xdriinfo.c.~1.1.3.1.~ 2004-06-16 11:27:39.000000000 +0200 +++ ./xdriinfo.c 2005-02-21 22:50:37.000000000 +0100 @@ -28,6 +28,14 @@ #include #include +#ifdef GLX_VERSION_1_4 +# define GLX_GET_PROC_ADDRESS(name) \ + glXGetProcAddress((const GLubyte *)(name)) +#else +# define GLX_GET_PROC_ADDRESS(name) \ + glXGetProcAddressARB((const GLubyte *)(name)) +#endif + typedef const char * glXGetScreenDriver_t (Display *dpy, int scrNum); typedef const char * glXGetDriverConfig_t (const char *driverName); @@ -57,10 +65,13 @@ char *funcArg = NULL; char *dpyName = NULL; - GetScreenDriver = (glXGetScreenDriver_t *)glXGetProcAddress ("glXGetScreenDriver"); - GetDriverConfig = (glXGetDriverConfig_t *)glXGetProcAddress ("glXGetDriverConfig"); + GetScreenDriver = (glXGetScreenDriver_t *) + GLX_GET_PROC_ADDRESS ("glXGetScreenDriver"); + GetDriverConfig = (glXGetDriverConfig_t *) + GLX_GET_PROC_ADDRESS ("glXGetDriverConfig"); if (!GetScreenDriver || !GetDriverConfig) { - fprintf (stderr, "libGL is too old.\n"); + fprintf (stderr, "libGL does not support the " + "DRI configuration infrastructure.\n"); return 1; } --=-9+Xcj2feZsEstRLVbofT-- From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 22 04:29:13 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA1A316A4CE for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 04:29:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from asclepius.uwa.edu.au (asclepius3.uwa.edu.au [130.95.128.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80BD443D4C for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 04:29:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zanchey@mussel.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au) Received: from asclepius.kas (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asclepius.uwa.edu.au (Postfix) with SMTP id CA6E6183718 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:29:10 +0800 (WST) Received: from asclepius (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asclepius.prekas (Postfix) with SMTP id B9DCA183616 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:29:10 +0800 (WST) X-UWA-Client-IP: 130.95.13.9 (UWA) Received: from mooneye.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au (mooneye.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au [130.95.13.9]) by asclepius.input (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0C7D183588 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:29:10 +0800 (WST) Received: by mooneye.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au (Postfix, from userid 801) id E7DBD17F1E; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:29:09 +0800 (WST) Received: from mussel.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au (mussel.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au [130.95.13.18]) by mooneye.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D9A017DF4; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:29:09 +0800 (WST) Received: from zanchey (helo=localhost) by mussel.ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au with local-esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1D3RfZ-0005wV-00; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:29:09 +0800 Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:29:09 +0800 (WST) From: David Adam To: Dejan Lesjak In-Reply-To: <200502212133.19515.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> Message-ID: References: <4219D008.6030107@alumni.rice.edu> <200502212133.19515.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: David Adam X-SpamTest-Info: Profile: Formal (208/050203) X-SpamTest-Info: Profile: Detect Hard [UCS 290904] X-SpamTest-Info: Profile: SysLog X-SpamTest-Info: Profile: Marking Spam - Subject (UCS) [02-08-04] X-SpamTest-Status: Not detected X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 2.0.0 [0125], KAS/Release cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org cc: noackjr@alumni.rice.edu Subject: Re: X.Org 6.8.2 - (most probably) final patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 04:29:13 -0000 Just weighing in on this... On Mon, 21 Feb 2005, Dejan Lesjak wrote: > This should also be better with gzipped vs bzipped tarballs. I don't have any > preference here. I'd like to know what we should be more concerned about here > - size of distfile or the speed of extraction. Please keep in mind though > that some people pay internet access by used bandwidth (and it's not cheap in > some cases). Here are both sizes for comparison: In my (completely unqualified) opinion, size of distfile is a much higher priority than the speed of extraction. Until recently, I was getting my ports on 56k, and that extra 11MB would hit hard - I am sure there are still many people in the world who are in a similar situation. If I use my University's connection, it's 6c/MB for international traffic, so the smaller the better. Again, there are bound to be users who are affected by this. The Subversion team looked at this when they were designing their system, and decided that disk space/CPU time were a lot more expendable than bandwidth, which is why SVN works well over dial-up. 17 minutes ~is~ a long time for extraction (particularly over several ports) but I think it's a problem best solved by split distfiles, not by lower compression. Is there any way around it (turning off cleaning, unbzip2ing and modification of the Makefile/distinfo)? Cheers, David Adam zanchey@ucc.gu.uwa.edu.au From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 22 05:08:29 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD05516A4CE; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 05:08:29 +0000 (GMT) Received: from corbulon.video-collage.com (static-151-204-231-237.bos.east.verizon.net [151.204.231.237]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 205C143D2D; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 05:08:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mi@corbulon.video-collage.com) Received: from corbulon.video-collage.com (smmsp@localhost.video-collage.com [127.0.0.1])j1M58MT0094099 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 22 Feb 2005 00:08:23 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi@corbulon.video-collage.com) Received: (from root@localhost)j1M58MAN094098; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 00:08:22 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mi) From: Mikhail Teterin Message-Id: <200502220508.j1M58MAN094098@corbulon.video-collage.com> To: fxkuehl@gmx.de (Felix =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=FChling?=) Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 00:08:22 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <1109022957.3355.15.camel@trabant> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL7] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version devel-20040615, clamav-milter version 0.73a on corbulon.video-collage.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.43 cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org cc: acardenas@bsdperu.org Subject: Re: ports/76257: nvidia_driver breaks xorg-clients build X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 05:08:29 -0000 > Could you try if the attached patch against xdriinfo.c works with > NVidia's GLX? If it does, then I'll commit this to Xorg CVS. Using glXGetProcAddressARB instead of glXGetProcAddress allows the utility to build, but it still does not work -- the calls return NULL at run-time. If your program only works with Xorg's GLX, than, indeed, the error message may need to become more informative. If, on the other hand, using the glXGetProcAddressARB works when linked with Xorg's GLX -- why bother with the #ifdefs at all? Just use the old call for the time being. :-) -mi > --- ./xdriinfo.c.~1.1.3.1.~ 2004-06-16 11:27:39.000000000 +0200 > +++ ./xdriinfo.c 2005-02-21 22:50:37.000000000 +0100 > @@ -28,6 +28,14 @@ > #include > #include > > +#ifdef GLX_VERSION_1_4 > +# define GLX_GET_PROC_ADDRESS(name) \ > + glXGetProcAddress((const GLubyte *)(name)) > +#else > +# define GLX_GET_PROC_ADDRESS(name) \ > + glXGetProcAddressARB((const GLubyte *)(name)) > +#endif > + > typedef const char * glXGetScreenDriver_t (Display *dpy, int scrNum); > typedef const char * glXGetDriverConfig_t (const char *driverName); > > @@ -57,10 +65,13 @@ From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 22 08:37:00 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A8CE16A4D0 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:37:00 +0000 (GMT) Received: from leguin.anholt.net (69-30-77-85.dq1sn.easystreet.com [69.30.77.85]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7199243D2D for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:36:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from eta@lclark.edu) Received: from leguin.anholt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by leguin.anholt.net (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j1M8awO2034493; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 00:36:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eta@lclark.edu) Received: (from anholt@localhost) by leguin.anholt.net (8.13.3/8.13.1/Submit) id j1M8av6E034492; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 00:36:57 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from eta@lclark.edu) X-Authentication-Warning: leguin.anholt.net: anholt set sender to eta@lclark.edu using -f From: Eric Anholt To: Shaun Mickey In-Reply-To: <200503211336.27906.smickey@mynetsetup.com> References: <200503211336.27906.smickey@mynetsetup.com> Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 00:36:56 -0800 Message-Id: <1109061416.1005.6.camel@leguin> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xorg corruption X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 08:37:00 -0000 On Mon, 2005-03-21 at 13:36 -0500, Shaun Mickey wrote: > First off i have FreeBSD 5.3 stable on a dell latitude c600 (p3 750 512mb ram) > i have xorg installed and have had both Gnome and KDE installed (not at the > same time though). > > Every time i go to start kde or gnome after a shutdown, (using halt, shutdown, > or reboot) the screen that's supposed to be black and white checkered with > the X cursor is a corrupted version of a screenshot, or horizontal pink and > gray bars. I believe the processor is spiked as well because i can move the > mouse but there is a 1-2 second delay before it moves and it jumps, it > doesn't refresh smoothly. > > About 5 minutes after i started xorg i am logged into gnome and can slowly > logout. After about another 3-5 minutes i'm logged out. Now i can go startx > again and it starts perfectly and i'm logged in in < 2 minutes. > > I've installed freebsd several times, always with the same options (first two > times i installed gnome, last time i installed kde) It never fails to happen > after a reboot. > > Here are the vitals, let me know if anything else is needed. Does the situation change if you disable the DRI by commenting out 'Load "dri"' in the config? If I was guessing, I'd say that the card is hanging, and your /va/rlog/Xorg.0.log is repeatedly saying that it's resetting the card. Either way, the log file is key here. -- Eric Anholt eta@lclark.edu http://people.freebsd.org/~anholt/ anholt@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 22 10:34:59 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C132116A4CF for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 10:34:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.des.no (flood.des.no [217.116.83.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CD4F43D5D for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 10:34:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by smtp.des.no (Pony Express, from userid 666) id 62356530D; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 11:34:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from xps.des.no (des.no [80.203.228.37]) by smtp.des.no (Pony Express) with ESMTP id 150F85308; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 11:34:27 +0100 (CET) Received: by xps.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 83A7233C3E; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 11:34:27 +0100 (CET) To: David Adam References: <4219D008.6030107@alumni.rice.edu> <200502212133.19515.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> From: des@des.no (=?iso-8859-1?q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=) Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 11:34:27 +0100 In-Reply-To: (David Adam's message of "Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:29:09 +0800 (WST)") Message-ID: <86y8dgannw.fsf@xps.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110002 (No Gnus v0.2) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.1 (2004-10-22) on flood.des.no X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,FORGED_RCVD_HELO autolearn=disabled version=3.0.1 cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org cc: noackjr@alumni.rice.edu Subject: Re: X.Org 6.8.2 - (most probably) final patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 10:34:59 -0000 David Adam writes: > 17 minutes ~is~ a long time for extraction (particularly over several > ports) but I think it's a problem best solved by split distfiles, not by > lower compression. > > Is there any way around it (turning off cleaning, unbzip2ing and > modification of the Makefile/distinfo)? One possibility is to create a port that installs a patched source tree into /usr/X11R6/src/${PORTVERSION}, and have the other ports BUILD_DEPEND on it and lndir(1) the source code into their WRKDIR. This would have the added advantage of eliminating the current mess with random xorg ports nicking patches from eachother. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 22 13:21:14 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D771816A4CF for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:21:14 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (imap.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9D85243D5A for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:21:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fxkuehl@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2005 13:21:11 -0000 Received: from dialin-212-144-010-008.arcor-ip.net (EHLO trabant) (212.144.10.8) by mail.gmx.net (mp003) with SMTP; 22 Feb 2005 14:21:11 +0100 X-Authenticated: #7318305 Received: from trabant ([127.0.0.1] ident=felix) by trabant with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1D3a0u-0000vu-00; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:23:44 +0100 From: Felix =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=FChling?= To: Mikhail Teterin In-Reply-To: <200502220508.j1M58MAN094098@corbulon.video-collage.com> References: <200502220508.j1M58MAN094098@corbulon.video-collage.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:23:42 +0100 Message-Id: <1109078622.3320.2.camel@trabant> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org cc: acardenas@bsdperu.org Subject: Re: ports/76257: nvidia_driver breaks xorg-clients build X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:21:15 -0000 Am Dienstag, den 22.02.2005, 00:08 -0500 schrieb Mikhail Teterin: > > Could you try if the attached patch against xdriinfo.c works with > > NVidia's GLX? If it does, then I'll commit this to Xorg CVS. >=20 > Using glXGetProcAddressARB instead of glXGetProcAddress allows the > utility to build, but it still does not work -- the calls return NULL at > run-time. >=20 > If your program only works with Xorg's GLX, than, indeed, the error > message may need to become more informative. It was already changed in my patch. Do you have any better suggestions? >=20 > If, on the other hand, using the glXGetProcAddressARB works when linked > with Xorg's GLX -- why bother with the #ifdefs at all? Just use the old > call for the time being. :-) As I mentioned in an earlier mail, the GLX headers from Xorg don't seem to define the ARB function any more. >=20 > -mi >=20 > > --- ./xdriinfo.c.~1.1.3.1.~ 2004-06-16 11:27:39.000000000 +0200 > > +++ ./xdriinfo.c 2005-02-21 22:50:37.000000000 +0100 > > @@ -28,6 +28,14 @@ > > #include > > #include > > =20 > > +#ifdef GLX_VERSION_1_4 > > +# define GLX_GET_PROC_ADDRESS(name) \ > > + glXGetProcAddress((const GLubyte *)(name)) > > +#else > > +# define GLX_GET_PROC_ADDRESS(name) \ > > + glXGetProcAddressARB((const GLubyte *)(name)) > > +#endif > > + > > typedef const char * glXGetScreenDriver_t (Display *dpy, int scrNum); > > typedef const char * glXGetDriverConfig_t (const char *driverName); > > =20 > > @@ -57,10 +65,13 @@ >=20 --=20 | Felix K=FChling http://fxk.de.vu | | PGP Fingerprint: 6A3C 9566 5B30 DDED 73C3 B152 151C 5CC1 D888 E595 | From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 22 13:31:42 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 597A216A4CE for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:31:42 +0000 (GMT) Received: from niobe.ijs.si (mail.ijs.si [193.2.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F5DD43D5E for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:31:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dejan.lesjak@ijs.si) Received: from localhost (localhost.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) by niobe.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FECA1DD666; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:31:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from niobe.ijs.si ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (niobe.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 75979-09-4; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:31:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from metatron.ijs.si (metatron.ijs.si [193.2.4.152]) by niobe.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FB2D1DD5A7; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:31:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from idefix.ijs.si (idefix.ijs.si [193.2.4.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by metatron.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73A9C1C0071C; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:31:13 +0100 (CET) From: Dejan Lesjak To: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?q?Sm=F8rgrav?= Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:31:12 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <4219D008.6030107@alumni.rice.edu> <86y8dgannw.fsf@xps.des.no> In-Reply-To: <86y8dgannw.fsf@xps.des.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502221431.12805.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ijs.si cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org cc: noackjr@alumni.rice.edu Subject: Re: X.Org 6.8.2 - (most probably) final patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 13:31:42 -0000 On Tuesday 22 of February 2005 11:34, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > David Adam writes: > > 17 minutes ~is~ a long time for extraction (particularly over several > > ports) but I think it's a problem best solved by split distfiles, not by > > lower compression. > > > > Is there any way around it (turning off cleaning, unbzip2ing and > > modification of the Makefile/distinfo)? > > One possibility is to create a port that installs a patched source > tree into /usr/X11R6/src/${PORTVERSION}, and have the other ports > BUILD_DEPEND on it and lndir(1) the source code into their WRKDIR. > This would have the added advantage of eliminating the current mess > with random xorg ports nicking patches from eachother. > > DES Excellent idea! I was pondering on how this would handle the case where a patch would need = to=20 be added to single port, say xorg-vfbserver... If a patch would go to this= =20 port then lndir wouldn't help, since it would patch the installed source fi= le=20 (and on next rebuild fail because of previously applied patch). If a patch= =20 would go into this source port, then lndir would work, but there needs to b= e=20 a way for xorg-vfbserver to know that the patch has been applied. I was=20 pondering at first that source port would rather install=20 into /usr/X11R6/src/${PORTVERSION}_${PORTREVISION} and xorg-vfbserver would= =20 depend on this location. But that would require changing all of the other=20 ports to depend on new location of source. I'm now thinking of two=20 possibilities: =2D defining proper src location in xorg-source port Makefile.inc or some s= uch=20 and including this in all xorg- ports =2D installing in /usr/X11R6/src/${PORTVERSION} but with placeholder files= =20 like /usr/X11R6/src/${PORTVERSION}/.foopatch-applied and depending on that= =20 (with proper if(source installed) && !exists(.foopatch-applied) echo=20 "somekindofexplanation") Anyway, this seems doable so far. I'm still hoping that there will be split= =20 distfiles for this release since this upgrade is now quite far, and I'm not= =20 sure whether portmgr will want another test run with such change (the=20 packages contents and installed files should stay the same so this is rathe= r=20 internal xorg- ports change, but configure parts would probably need to be= =20 reworked and all...). Nevertheless, if nobody comes up with a scenario in=20 which this way would fail I think this is the way to go :) I was thinking of doing something to use the same source for all of separat= e=20 ports through using WRKSRC or somesuch, but never thought of actually=20 installing the source. Nifty trick, thanks :) Dejan From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 22 14:55:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D4EE16A4CE for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:55:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from niobe.ijs.si (mail.ijs.si [193.2.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3690B43D1D for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:55:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dejan.lesjak@ijs.si) Received: from localhost (localhost.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) by niobe.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30FBD1DD4DA; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:55:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from niobe.ijs.si ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (niobe.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 87171-06-7; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:55:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from metatron.ijs.si (metatron.ijs.si [193.2.4.152]) by niobe.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80A0F1DD6CE; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:54:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from idefix.ijs.si (idefix.ijs.si [193.2.4.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by metatron.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E561C00720; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:54:17 +0100 (CET) From: Dejan Lesjak To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:54:16 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <4219D008.6030107@alumni.rice.edu> <86y8dgannw.fsf@xps.des.no> <200502221431.12805.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> In-Reply-To: <200502221431.12805.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502221554.17317.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ijs.si cc: noackjr@alumni.rice.edu Subject: Re: X.Org 6.8.2 - (most probably) final patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:55:26 -0000 A quick update... among discussion on IRC, cperciva suggested BUILD_DEPENDS += ${PORTSDIR}/x11/xorg/work/foo:${PORTSDIR}/x11/xorg:extract This could avoid installing source, but still benefit from lndir. Still thinking about it and still hoping/waiting if split files will appear... Dejan From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 22 17:19:55 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B85C216A4CE; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:19:55 +0000 (GMT) Received: from harik.murex.com (mail.murex.com [194.98.239.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EEA743D5C; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:19:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Mikhail.Teterin@murex.com) From: Mikhail Teterin Organization: Murex North America To: Felix =?iso-8859-1?q?K=FChling?= Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 12:19:19 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <200502220508.j1M58MAN094098@corbulon.video-collage.com> <1109078622.3320.2.camel@trabant> In-Reply-To: <1109078622.3320.2.camel@trabant> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502221710.j1MH9a5v009787@harik.murex.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Feb 2005 17:19:21.0940 (UTC) FILETIME=[A63A6140:01C51902] cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org cc: acardenas@bsdperu.org Subject: Re: ports/76257: nvidia_driver breaks xorg-clients build X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:19:55 -0000 > It was already changed in my patch. Do you have any better suggestions? Not really... > As I mentioned in an earlier mail, the GLX headers from Xorg don't seem > to define the ARB function any more. 6.8.1 still has it. Not sure about 6.8.2. In that case, the following little hunk: +#ifndef GLX_VERSION_1_4 +# define glXGetProcAddress glXGetProcAddressARB +#endif seems less intrusive :-) The utility will still not *work* when compiled against GLX-1.3 headers, but it will *compile*. To allow for -lGL to be interchangible post-build, however, it may be required to make a dlopen/dlsym search for the glXGetProcAddress symbol at run-time. Would you like a patch? It will, unavoidably, system-specific, but should work on most (all?) systems supported by Xorg. You will also be able to remove this hack in a few years, when all available GLX implementations are upgraded. Yours, -mi From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 22 21:05:37 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99BA916A4CF for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 21:05:37 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (pop.gmx.de [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 15C6643D48 for ; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 21:05:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fxkuehl@gmx.de) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 22 Feb 2005 21:05:33 -0000 Received: from dialin-212-144-009-100.arcor-ip.net (EHLO trabant) (212.144.9.100) by mail.gmx.net (mp020) with SMTP; 22 Feb 2005 22:05:33 +0100 X-Authenticated: #7318305 Received: from trabant ([127.0.0.1] ident=felix) by trabant with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1D3hGI-0001nw-00; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 22:08:06 +0100 From: Felix =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=FChling?= To: Mikhail Teterin In-Reply-To: <200502221710.j1MH9a5v009787@harik.murex.com> References: <200502220508.j1M58MAN094098@corbulon.video-collage.com> <1109078622.3320.2.camel@trabant> <200502221710.j1MH9a5v009787@harik.murex.com> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=-F9sq+sEiv6SE5fhEmTl3" Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 22:08:05 +0100 Message-Id: <1109106485.6323.13.camel@trabant> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.3 X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org cc: acardenas@bsdperu.org Subject: Re: ports/76257: nvidia_driver breaks xorg-clients build X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 21:05:37 -0000 --=-F9sq+sEiv6SE5fhEmTl3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Dienstag, den 22.02.2005, 12:19 -0500 schrieb Mikhail Teterin: > > It was already changed in my patch. Do you have any better suggestions? >=20 > Not really... >=20 > > As I mentioned in an earlier mail, the GLX headers from Xorg don't seem > > to define the ARB function any more. >=20 > 6.8.1 still has it. Not sure about 6.8.2. In that case, the following lit= tle=20 > hunk: >=20 > +#ifndef GLX_VERSION_1_4 > +# define glXGetProcAddress glXGetProcAddressARB > +#endif >=20 > seems less intrusive :-) The utility will still not *work* when compiled=20 > against GLX-1.3 headers, but it will *compile*. >=20 > To allow for -lGL to be interchangible post-build, however, it may be req= uired=20 > to make a dlopen/dlsym search for the glXGetProcAddress symbol at run-tim= e. >=20 > Would you like a patch? It will, unavoidably, system-specific, but should= work=20 > on most (all?) systems supported by Xorg. You will also be able to remove= =20 > this hack in a few years, when all available GLX implementations are=20 > upgraded. Yours, >=20 > -mi The attached patch (undo my other patch first) implements something like this without actually loading libGL dynamically. It uses dlopen(NULL, ...) to get a handle for the main program (including libGL). I hope this is portable. Does this work for you? Note that the patch also changes the Imakefile. In xc/programs/xdriinfo run this to update the Makefile: make Makefile make depend Then recompile xdriinfo as usual. --=20 | Felix K=FChling http://fxk.de.vu | | PGP Fingerprint: 6A3C 9566 5B30 DDED 73C3 B152 151C 5CC1 D888 E595 | --=-F9sq+sEiv6SE5fhEmTl3 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=xdriinfo_oldglx2.diff Content-Type: text/x-patch; name=xdriinfo_oldglx2.diff; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit --- ./xdriinfo.c.~1.1.3.1.~ 2004-06-16 11:27:39.000000000 +0200 +++ ./xdriinfo.c 2005-02-22 21:58:15.000000000 +0100 @@ -27,10 +27,13 @@ #include #include #include +#include +typedef void (* glXGetProcAddress_t (const GLubyte *procname)) (void); typedef const char * glXGetScreenDriver_t (Display *dpy, int scrNum); typedef const char * glXGetDriverConfig_t (const char *driverName); +glXGetProcAddress_t *GetProcAddress; glXGetScreenDriver_t *GetScreenDriver; glXGetDriverConfig_t *GetDriverConfig; @@ -56,11 +59,33 @@ enum INFO_FUNC func = LIST; char *funcArg = NULL; char *dpyName = NULL; + void *dlHandle; - GetScreenDriver = (glXGetScreenDriver_t *)glXGetProcAddress ("glXGetScreenDriver"); - GetDriverConfig = (glXGetDriverConfig_t *)glXGetProcAddress ("glXGetDriverConfig"); + /* dlopen (NULL, ...) returns a handle for the main program. */ + dlHandle = dlopen (NULL, RTLD_NOW | RTLD_GLOBAL); + if (dlHandle == NULL) { + /* should never happen */ + fprintf (stderr, "Can't dlopen main program.\n"); + return 1; + } + GetProcAddress = (glXGetProcAddress_t *) + dlsym (dlHandle, "glXGetProcAddress"); + if (GetProcAddress == NULL) + GetProcAddress = (glXGetProcAddress_t *) + dlsym (dlHandle, "glXGetProcAddressARB"); + if (GetProcAddress == NULL) { + fprintf (stderr, "Couldn't find glXGetProcAddress[ARB].\n"); + return 1; + } + dlclose (dlHandle); + + GetScreenDriver = (glXGetScreenDriver_t *) + GetProcAddress ((GLubyte*)"glXGetScreenDriver"); + GetDriverConfig = (glXGetDriverConfig_t *) + GetProcAddress ((GLubyte*)"glXGetDriverConfig"); if (!GetScreenDriver || !GetDriverConfig) { - fprintf (stderr, "libGL is too old.\n"); + fprintf (stderr, "libGL does not support the " + "DRI configuration infrastructure.\n"); return 1; } --- ./Imakefile.~1.2.~ 2004-08-28 15:44:48.000000000 +0200 +++ ./Imakefile 2005-02-22 21:50:48.000000000 +0100 @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ SRCS = xdriinfo.c OBJS = xdriinfo.o - LOCAL_LIBRARIES = $(GLXLIB) $(XLIB) + LOCAL_LIBRARIES = $(GLXLIB) $(XLIB) -ldl DEPLIBS = AllTarget(ProgramTargetName(xdriinfo)) --=-F9sq+sEiv6SE5fhEmTl3-- From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 22 21:19:26 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F5A216A4CE; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 21:19:26 +0000 (GMT) Received: from harik.murex.com (mail.murex.com [194.98.239.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AAAC43D1D; Tue, 22 Feb 2005 21:19:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Mikhail.Teterin@murex.com) From: Mikhail Teterin Organization: Murex North America To: Felix =?iso-8859-1?q?K=FChling?= Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:18:51 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <200502220508.j1M58MAN094098@corbulon.video-collage.com> <200502221710.j1MH9a5v009787@harik.murex.com> <1109106485.6323.13.camel@trabant> In-Reply-To: <1109106485.6323.13.camel@trabant> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-u" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502222109.j1ML995v026956@harik.murex.com> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 22 Feb 2005 21:18:55.0081 (UTC) FILETIME=[1D49A590:01C51924] cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org cc: acardenas@bsdperu.org Subject: Re: ports/76257: nvidia_driver breaks xorg-clients build X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Feb 2005 21:19:26 -0000 > The attached patch (undo my other patch first) implements something like > this without actually loading libGL dynamically. It uses > dlopen(NULL, ...) to get a handle for the main program (including > libGL). Yes, this is what I had in mind. > I hope this is portable. Does this work for you? I've seen `configure' scripts checking "whether dynamically linked program can dlopen itself". It can on Linux and FreeBSD... > Note that the patch also changes the Imakefile. In xc/programs/xdriinfo > run this to update the Makefile: > > make Makefile > make depend > > Then recompile xdriinfo as usual. Thanks! I'll try it, unless someone beats me to it. One thing, however (for now) -- when reporting failures of dlopen/dlsym, why not use dlerror() function to provide actual error message? Yours, -mi From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 23 00:26:52 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1D7516A4CE for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 00:26:52 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtp.dkm.cz (smtp.dkm.cz [62.24.64.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CCF8543D2D for ; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 00:26:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jj@wasteland.cz) Received: (qmail 54669 invoked by uid 0); 23 Feb 2005 00:26:48 -0000 Received: from lampicka.pawouk.net (HELO ?192.168.2.191?) (62.245.78.242) by smtp.dkm.cz with SMTP; 23 Feb 2005 00:26:48 -0000 Message-ID: <421BCDC5.6030105@wasteland.cz> Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 01:26:45 +0100 From: Josef Jedlicka User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20050221) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: xorg 6.8.2 with i810 driver DRI still don't work X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 00:26:53 -0000 Hello, yesterday i look that xorg 6.8.2 is out. I was happy because it can patch bug with i810 cards (see release information). But i don't know why it don't. I get patch (see X.Org 6.8.2 ports - take 1 thread in this mailing list) and applying it, then i run portupgrade -aF xorg and portupgrade -aR xorg. Compilation without errors. Freebsd patch works probably ok. BUT after compilation, i try run and still getting as before this errors: (II) I810(0): VESA BIOS detected (II) I810(0): VESA VBE Version 3.0 (II) I810(0): VESA VBE Total Mem: 16192 kB (II) I810(0): VESA VBE OEM: Intel(r)852MG/852MGE/855MG/855MGE Graphics Chip Accelerated VGA BIOS (II) I810(0): VESA VBE OEM Software Rev: 1.0 (II) I810(0): VESA VBE OEM Vendor: Intel Corporation (II) I810(0): VESA VBE OEM Product: Intel(r)852MG/852MGE/855MG/855MGE Graphics Controller (II) I810(0): VESA VBE OEM Product Rev: Hardware Version 0.0 (==) I810(0): Default visual is TrueColor (II) I810(0): Allocated 128 kB for the ring buffer at 0x0 (II) I810(0): Allocating at least 768 scanlines for pixmap cache (II) I810(0): Initial framebuffer allocation size: 3072 kByte (II) I810(0): Allocated 4 kB for HW cursor at 0x7fff000 (0x03796000) (WW) I810(0): xf86AllocateGARTMemory: allocation of 4 pages failed (Cannot allocate memory) (EE) I810(0): Failed to allocate HW (ARGB) cursor space. (II) I810(0): Allocated 4 kB for Overlay registers at 0x7ffe000 (0x01697000). (II) I810(0): Allocated 64 kB for the scratch buffer at 0x7fee000 drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0 drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such file or directory) drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such file or directory) drmOpenDevice: Open failed drmOpenDevice: node name is /dev/dri/card0 drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such file or directory) drmOpenDevice: open result is -1, (No such file or directory) drmOpenDevice: Open failed [drm] failed to load kernel module "i915" (II) I810(0): [drm] drmOpen failed (EE) I810(0): [dri] DRIScreenInit failed. Disabling DRI. I have 5.3-RELEASE kernel, cvsuped and fresh (2 or 3 days before) portupgraded system. Runing before xorg-6.8.1 was broken too :-( In xorg.conf a loading dri and gl modules + section dir (0666), i810 driver with VideoRam 32768... I'm completly stucked with this problem. Probably xorg's problem, but he told that i810 in 6.8.2 be ok. Please can somebody help? I writed now to freedesktop bugzilla too. From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 24 00:48:05 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DBD816A4CE for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 00:48:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web60802.mail.yahoo.com (web60802.mail.yahoo.com [216.155.196.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6CB5543D55 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 00:48:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dejamuse@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 80447 invoked by uid 60001); 24 Feb 2005 00:48:03 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=4g/IZPzCMHn3M+3c6ye9xczZpgswAAicACJpu4/fzI4B4ZMzgGiWfXh5fp44gJVG60Laxrpw9pz4WBUd79knVEGStLRMTtzWyVWqMYpOfYXoF9cGQPbgCzTebq5ZoW/gkHo6vnoK4EjNHq/gnhIxR1t7H/WxvBdI+XGH9/0jpTA= ; Message-ID: <20050224004803.80445.qmail@web60802.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.218.213.233] by web60802.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:48:03 PST Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:48:03 -0800 (PST) From: Jeffrey Colter To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Corrupted files? X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 00:48:05 -0000 Hi all, I successfully got X11 and KDE running on FreeBSD - I'm a newbie, so I was very happy! I had the internet working and everything. First I had DHCP and then I went to a static IP behind my linksys router and Comcast, so that I could run a website from my home using Apache. Then I tried to get Apache to run but was stymied by configuration errors. Well, the last thing I did was to change the etc/rc.conf file to comment out the line that said: hostname=".comcast.net" which was previously set by DHCP (because Apache said it couldn't resolve it). Then I rebooted and all hell broke loose. I had KDM set to auto start and after putting in the password, instead of starting KDE it went back to the login screen and would never start. I then went into the shell and manually changed the rc.conf file back to the way it was and rebooted again. This time I could login but I got the blue KDE screen background and a plain white background terminal box in the lower right corner, logged in as root. I could not get KDE to start again no matter what. How could I have possibly corrupted something? Should I remove KDM and reinstall, or do X11 and/or KDE too? KDE took an entire day to compile from the ports, so I am reluctant to do that over again - would probably use the binary package. Thanx for the help! ...Jeff __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - Sign up for Fantasy Baseball. http://baseball.fantasysports.yahoo.com/ From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 24 01:06:28 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7021C16A4CE for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 01:06:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from web60810.mail.yahoo.com (web60810.mail.yahoo.com [216.155.196.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DE50443D31 for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 01:06:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dejamuse@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 65107 invoked by uid 60001); 24 Feb 2005 01:06:27 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; b=hL35adwrXROwTn17hlmVmrogG8sW9zhajXZr1M6nJ4xVWbE419GaCR1BYAEJjqP1nV21E2VvVxg7XVoiyLx2HIt0fskYcFUd3sYno6oDR+ewMHrbQqlZjH3N/Y90E6XG8Q/FK8F+II8E1ygaLokqHYsKX4lfruL7YghqQ3kToUk= ; Message-ID: <20050224010627.65105.qmail@web60810.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.218.213.233] by web60810.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:06:27 PST Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:06:27 -0800 (PST) From: Jeffrey Colter To: Jeffrey Colter , freebsd-x11@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20050224004803.80445.qmail@web60802.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Corrupted files? X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 01:06:28 -0000 One more thing I just realized... I looked at the etc/rc.conf file again and noticed that a line at the very bottom that was an include statement was missing. Some how I must have deleted that with a slip of the mouse or something, so the rc.conf file is incomplete. I have no way of knowing what additonal conf information it specified, so how far back to I have to go? May not be known... Whatever it was it affected how KDE started. The original build process generated the rc.conf file. Lost... Jeff --- Jeffrey Colter wrote: > Hi all, > > I successfully got X11 and KDE running on FreeBSD - > I'm a newbie, so I was very happy! I had the > internet working and everything. First I had DHCP > and > then I went to a static IP behind my linksys router > and Comcast, so that I could run a website from my > home using Apache. > > Then I tried to get Apache to run but was stymied by > configuration errors. Well, the last thing I did > was > to change the etc/rc.conf file to comment out the > line > that said: hostname=".comcast.net" which was > previously set by DHCP (because Apache said it > couldn't resolve it). Then I rebooted and all hell > broke loose. > > I had KDM set to auto start and after putting in the > password, instead of starting KDE it went back to > the > login screen and would never start. I then went > into > the shell and manually changed the rc.conf file back > to the way it was and rebooted again. This time I > could login but I got the blue KDE screen background > and a plain white background terminal box in the > lower > right corner, logged in as root. I could not get > KDE > to start again no matter what. > > How could I have possibly corrupted something? > > Should I remove KDM and reinstall, or do X11 and/or > KDE too? KDE took an entire day to compile from the > ports, so I am reluctant to do that over again - > would > probably use the binary package. > > Thanx for the help! > > ...Jeff > > > > __________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > Yahoo! Sports - Sign up for Fantasy Baseball. > http://baseball.fantasysports.yahoo.com/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-x11@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-x11-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Mail - You care about security. So do we. http://promotions.yahoo.com/new_mail From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 24 16:49:40 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67A0B16A4CE for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:49:40 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.gmx.net (imap.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 48E5843D1F for ; Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:49:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michaelnottebrock@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 24 Feb 2005 16:49:37 -0000 Received: from p508BB16E.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO lofi.dyndns.org) (80.139.177.110) by mail.gmx.net (mp008) with SMTP; 24 Feb 2005 17:49:37 +0100 X-Authenticated: #443188 Received: from [192.168.8.4] (lofi@kiste.my.domain [192.168.8.4]) (authenticated bits=0) by lofi.dyndns.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j1OGnVmb007925 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:49:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from michaelnottebrock@gmx.net) From: Michael Nottebrock To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:49:28 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <20050224004803.80445.qmail@web60802.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20050224004803.80445.qmail@web60802.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1612951.GzsgGAsAZn"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200502241749.31481.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Subject: Re: Corrupted files? X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:49:40 -0000 --nextPart1612951.GzsgGAsAZn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday, 24. February 2005 01:48, Jeffrey Colter wrote: > hostname=3D".comcast.net" which was You need to set a sane hostname - any invented name will do (like=20 hostname=3D"machine", or hostname=3D"machine.my.domain"). Just try to not c= hoose=20 a name that clashes with an already existing hostname. =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --nextPart1612951.GzsgGAsAZn Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBCHgWbXhc68WspdLARAohDAKCbd5airzzIuKmYjGeH9Ku4tXQklgCdG14O I8TfzB5Sk7pBHHKyocTbo5Y= =XjHY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1612951.GzsgGAsAZn-- From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 25 07:27:43 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D5ED16A4CE for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:27:43 +0000 (GMT) Received: from niobe.ijs.si (mail.ijs.si [193.2.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D7143D67 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:27:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dejan.lesjak@ijs.si) Received: from localhost (localhost.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) by niobe.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id C59CC1DD436; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:27:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from niobe.ijs.si ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (niobe.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 40432-15-2; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:27:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from metatron.ijs.si (metatron.ijs.si [193.2.4.152]) by niobe.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id A79231DD667; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:27:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from idefix.ijs.si (idefix.ijs.si [193.2.4.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by metatron.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A8321C00715; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:27:28 +0100 (CET) From: Dejan Lesjak To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:27:27 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <20050221014454.GA55172@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20050221014454.GA55172@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502250827.28069.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ijs.si cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: NO_LATEST_LINK in imake-6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:27:43 -0000 On Monday 21 of February 2005 02:44, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Should the NO_LATEST_LINK in devel/imake-6 be removed? It's not going > to conflict with imake-4 since only one of those packages is built on > any given branch. Sure, I'll remove it then :) Dejan From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 25 15:44:04 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3FBE16A4CE for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:44:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from Shenton.org (23.ebbed1.client.atlantech.net [209.190.235.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A2E3E43D55 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:44:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@Shenton.Org) Received: (qmail 33609 invoked by uid 1001); 25 Feb 2005 15:44:02 -0000 From: Chris Shenton To: x11@freebsd.org References: <86hdkubl45.fsf@PECTOPAH.shenton.org> Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:44:02 -0500 In-Reply-To: <86hdkubl45.fsf@PECTOPAH.shenton.org> (Chris Shenton's message of "Wed, 02 Feb 2005 18:25:14 -0500") Message-ID: <86ekf4r6f1.fsf@PECTOPAH.shenton.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110003 (No Gnus v0.3) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: [SOLVED] Re: 5.3 Xorg Xinerama doesn't render remote windows now X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:44:04 -0000 Summary: was running Xinerama on a dual-head Matrox G450 just fine, did some portupgrades involving X11, and now windows started from remote machines don't render their content -- I only see the frame. I portupgrade xorg-server, xorg-libraries, xorg-clients with no change. I disabled all the nonessential Load and Option lines in XF86Config, and turned down DefaultDepth but again with no change. Finally I did a portupgrade of my window manager, fvwm2, and this fixed the problem. Doh! From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 26 22:07:56 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DD5D16A4CE for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 22:07:56 +0000 (GMT) Received: from niobe.ijs.si (mail.ijs.si [193.2.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE83A43D2D for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 22:07:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dejan.lesjak@ijs.si) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by niobe.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id E21AD1DD461 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 23:07:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from niobe.ijs.si ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (niobe.ijs.si [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 92128-05 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 23:07:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from metatron.ijs.si (metatron.ijs.si [193.2.4.152]) by niobe.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8556E1DD57E for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 23:07:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from idefix.ijs.si (idefix.ijs.si [193.2.4.33]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by metatron.ijs.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E46E1C00711 for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2005 23:07:41 +0100 (CET) From: Dejan Lesjak To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 23:07:40 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.7.2 References: <4219D008.6030107@alumni.rice.edu> <200502221431.12805.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> <200502221554.17317.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> In-Reply-To: <200502221554.17317.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200502262307.41032.dejan.lesjak@ijs.si> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ijs.si Subject: Re: X.Org 6.8.2 - (most probably) final patch X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Feb 2005 22:07:56 -0000 On Tuesday 22 of February 2005 15:54, Dejan Lesjak wrote: > A quick update... among discussion on IRC, cperciva suggested > BUILD_DEPENDS += ${PORTSDIR}/x11/xorg/work/foo:${PORTSDIR}/x11/xorg:extract > This could avoid installing source, but still benefit from lndir. > Still thinking about it and still hoping/waiting if split files will > appear... I'm still playing with this to perhaps use it at later time (certainly not before ports freeze and FreeBSD 5.4 release). In the meantime, split distfiles have shown up on mirrors, so they will be used for ports. Dejan