From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 00:08:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48FE816A425 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 00:08:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from ext-gw.lemis.com (ext-gw.lemis.com [150.101.14.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DD6E43D46 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 00:08:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from wantadilla.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.135]) by ext-gw.lemis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CD7B131138; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 10:38:48 +1030 (CST) Received: by wantadilla.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id E60FB855E8; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 10:38:47 +1030 (CST) Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 10:38:47 +1030 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: gooroo@list.ru Message-ID: <20060108000847.GW39391@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <004901c613be$947c0eb0$0a05a8c0@gooroo> <003c01c613be$4411d090$0a05a8c0@gooroo> <002101c613bc$a4f9c6d0$0a05a8c0@gooroo> <001101c613ad$4b683bb0$0a05a8c0@gooroo> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cpaUq5xajNwm3m9f" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <004901c613be$947c0eb0$0a05a8c0@gooroo> <003c01c613be$4411d090$0a05a8c0@gooroo> <002101c613bc$a4f9c6d0$0a05a8c0@gooroo> <001101c613ad$4b683bb0$0a05a8c0@gooroo> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Problem in install USB data cabel (based on prolific 2303 chip) for Siemens C72 mobile phone. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 00:08:50 -0000 --cpaUq5xajNwm3m9f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Saturday, 7 January 2006 at 19:10:33 +0200, gooroo@list.ru wrote: On Saturday, 7 January 2006 at 21:12:04 +0200, gooroo@list.ru wrote: On Saturday, 7 January 2006 at 21:12:04 +0200, gooroo@list.ru wrote: On Saturday, 7 January 2006 at 21:14:19 +0200, gooroo@list.ru wrote: > # This is loader.conf - a file full of useful variables that you can > # set to change the default load behavior of your system. Only yesterday I replied to another message of yours suggesting that you should read http://www.lemis.com/questions.html. You appear not to have done so. There you would have read: > When submitting a question to FreeBSD-questions, consider the > following points: > > 1. Remember that nobody gets paid for answering a FreeBSD > question. They do it of their own free will. You can influence > this free will positively by submitting a well-formulated > question supplying as much relevant information as possible. You > can influence this free will negatively by submitting an > incomplete, illegible, or rude question. > ... > 6. Specify as much information as possible. > > * In nearly every case, it's important to know the version of > FreeBSD you're running. This is particularly the case for > FreeBSD-CURRENT, where you should also specify the date of the > sources, though of course you shouldn't be sending questions > about -CURRENT to FreeBSD-questions. > > * With any problem which could be hardware related, tell us about > your hardware. In case of doubt, assume it's possible that it's > hardware. What kind of CPU are you using? How fast? What > motherboard? How much memory? What peripherals? > > * If you get error messages, don't say "I get error messages", say > (for example) "I get the error message 'No route to host"'. You have driven this problem to extremes by not specifying any problem at all. > 7. If you do all this, and you still don't get an answer, there > could be other reasons. For example, the problem is so > complicated that nobody knows the answer, or the person who does > know the answer was offline. If you don't get an answer after, > say, a week, it might help to re-send the message. If you don't > get an answer to your second message, though, you're probably > not going to get one from this forum. Resending the same message > again and again will only make you unpopular. You sent the same message four times in two hours. You didn't state a problem, so you were lucky to get any kind of reply at all. You won't get a solution to your problem until you describe it. Please don't send any more messages until you have something to say. Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html Finger grog@FreeBSD.org for PGP public key. See complete headers for address and phone numbers. --cpaUq5xajNwm3m9f Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDwFgPIubykFB6QiMRAue2AJ9XMigIDbDQfMOb/v8x29UoXFxeUwCeKQj6 SZc++7y38UMB2didhTI2L9k= =Qaur -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cpaUq5xajNwm3m9f-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 00:49:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA8C716A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 00:49:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33302.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33302.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.117]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D25343D48 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 00:49:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 2208 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Jan 2006 00:49:12 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=nOFI9y3smpeDL/bUZY64w95PFeCoNOeplQ1LU0Qs7ilcY8xIW5s1CL2ZnHorRcIwEV7AIzPl0VxnTxy/mVAGdPRXEZ9FVU5j8XeS1PGdxSiaZ20R64juCf/7A/37/4jndSq7PZ28gOS+UiyrybdgkJjFn+1AHhyPSeEhePILsBw= ; Message-ID: <20060108004912.2206.qmail@web33302.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33302.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 07 Jan 2006 16:49:12 PST Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 16:49:12 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: JD Arnold , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: Programming Book(s) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 00:49:13 -0000 --- JD Arnold wrote: > Danial Thom wrote: > > > > --- Nicolas Blais > wrote: > > > >> On January 2, 2006 04:52 pm, Sean wrote: > >>> Sean wrote: > >>>> Looking for recommendations on any Unix > >> programming books. > >>>> I have been out of things for a while so I > >> would put my skill level back > >>>> to the beginning. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks > >>>> Sean > >>>> > >> > _______________________________________________ > >>>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >>>> > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >>>> > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >>> I forgot to mention that I wish to work > with > >> C/C++ > >>> Thanks again, > >>> Sean > >> There's a free C++ book which is great : > >> > > > http://mindview.net/Books/TICPP/ThinkingInCPP2e.html > >> You can also buy the hardcopy on Amazon. > >> > >> Nicolas > >> > > > > I'd recommend learning C before C++. In order > to > > be an effective unix programmer you must > master > > the C language, as you'll have to examine and > > modify code in C to do anything substantial. > > Virtually all major programs and kernels are > 'C' > > based. > > I think, in general, this is wrong. And I > think many "professionals" > also feel that learning C++ is the way to go. > If you just learning, > you might as well start with C++. For many good > reasons, see > Stroustrup's answer himself: > > http://public.research.att.com/~bs/learn.html > The concept that skipping the education part of it because C is too difficult is brilliant. I'll bet you all the guys at Bell Labs know C though. The question is, do you want to just write programs or do you want to be a programmer? If you buy a coffee table at AKEA and put it together you're not a carpenter. Just as if you slap together some C++ library code you're not a programmer. There is a distinction. DT __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 01:15:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0741B16A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 01:15:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from mail.storm.ca (mail.storm.ca [209.87.239.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 738D643D46 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 01:15:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from tigger.digitaltorque.ca (ppp-216-106-108-228.storm.ca [216.106.108.228]) by mail.storm.ca (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k081FcJ9001774 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2006 20:15:39 -0500 (EST) Received: from tigger.digitaltorque.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by tigger.digitaltorque.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7026823DDB for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2006 20:15:32 -0500 (EST) Received: (from msoulier@localhost) by tigger.digitaltorque.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id k081FUSq005614 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 7 Jan 2006 20:15:30 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: tigger.digitaltorque.ca: msoulier set sender to msoulier@digitaltorque.ca using -f Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 20:15:28 -0500 From: "Michael P. Soulier" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060108011528.GA4811@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200601021656.33323.nb_root@videotron.ca> <20060103155314.11865.qmail@web33315.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <5.1.0.14.2.20060107170727.04ccee50@mail.icsmx.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.2.20060107170727.04ccee50@mail.icsmx.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: Programming Book(s) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 01:15:41 -0000 --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 07/01/06 Jorge Biquez said: > Hello all. Very interesting comments and suggestions. > I hope my question does not seems too off topic. Do you think the path to= =20 > follow for developing applications for the new PDA, Smartphones, Ipaq and= =20 > similar devices it is the same? C or C++? I have some friends that said i= t=20 > is the only way but I am not sure of that. Any experiences or comments.? With the kind of hardware that can be put into a device like that these day= s, it's hard to tell, but I tend to see C/C++. Occasionally I see Java, someti= mes Python.=20 There is no rule for this, you simply use the right tool for the job. Mike --=20 Michael P. Soulier "Those who would give up esential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." --Benjamin Franklin --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDwGewKGqCc1vIvggRAuL4AJ0SdKlGVSimXD/HQWf8QZpAruO3UwCfaUUU 9/Jw/8tev2tIRHQrQ/eP3gs= =ssk4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 01:46:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83DC116A42A for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 01:46:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33310.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33310.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.125]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 02F8943D45 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 01:46:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 26954 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Jan 2006 01:46:03 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=5ak2VDuEBdvsQ/r5q5yUOmDsdTDwLfZqQFAhLj5MGyRmEoVxz9/p5yVoHwrGKZDwsLiSw2FXMEwNrYHbXfpeihI2YFb4ST50Zy9KQAhLw9ojMD+oHEoTRUdUlPCqW2fh4d7yobT4BZbNo3R+6HcttLvPShvdfZ0NPfqRRaNXKEQ= ; Message-ID: <20060108014603.26952.qmail@web33310.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33310.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 07 Jan 2006 17:46:03 PST Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 17:46:03 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: "Michael P. Soulier" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060108011528.GA4811@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: Programming Book(s) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 01:46:04 -0000 --- "Michael P. Soulier" wrote: > On 07/01/06 Jorge Biquez said: > > > Hello all. Very interesting comments and > suggestions. > > I hope my question does not seems too off > topic. Do you think the path to > > follow for developing applications for the > new PDA, Smartphones, Ipaq and > > similar devices it is the same? C or C++? I > have some friends that said it > > is the only way but I am not sure of that. > Any experiences or comments.? > > With the kind of hardware that can be put into > a device like that these days, > it's hard to tell, but I tend to see C/C++. > Occasionally I see Java, sometimes > Python. > > There is no rule for this, you simply use the > right tool for the job. > Am I the only one that has noticed that virtually everything written in Java sucks? I don't understand why its used. Is having a program that sucks on multiple platforms really an advantage over having a program that is good on 1 or 2 platforms? I really don't get it. DT __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 02:03:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4638E16A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 02:03:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA4AA43D46 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 02:03:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E3BD5DE5; Sat, 7 Jan 2006 21:03:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 63592-10; Sat, 7 Jan 2006 21:03:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-122-227.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.122.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 561D45CFC; Sat, 7 Jan 2006 21:03:11 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43C072E6.6020603@mac.com> Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 21:03:18 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ilya E Veretenkin References: <1388036653.20060108013522@mail.ru> In-Reply-To: <1388036653.20060108013522@mail.ru> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd 6 - amount of total visible memory is decreasing constantly X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 02:03:13 -0000 Ilya E Veretenkin wrote: > Problem: Total amount of visible memory is decreasing constantly [ ... ] > As you can see, memory which was visible using top utility decreased > from 3224 to 3195 Megabytes in less than 2 hours. And this process > will continue to the point, where swapping begins. > Server during this monitoring was running MySql4 + Apache1.3 under heavy > load. > > How to get rid of such memory loss? And what is the reason of such > memory loss? Pay attention to "sysctl kern.malloc" or "sysctl vm.zone" periodicly, and see whether some part of the kernel is leaking memory. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 03:18:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21D8616A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 03:18:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Hostmaster@Video2Video.Com) Received: from rocket.alienwebshop.com (rocket.alienwebshop.com [216.120.226.160]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C04EE43D45 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 03:18:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Hostmaster@Video2Video.Com) Received: by rocket.alienwebshop.com (Postfix, from userid 1037) id 013E025476; Sat, 7 Jan 2006 22:18:14 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rocket.alienwebshop.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C4E25472; Sat, 7 Jan 2006 22:18:13 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 22:18:13 -0500 (EST) From: Peter Leftwich X-X-Sender: pete@rocket.alienwebshop.com To: Robert Slade In-Reply-To: <1136619542.15229.19.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Message-ID: <20060107221637.F71629@rocket.alienwebshop.com> References: <55334.63.109.229.13.1136594923.squirrel@webmail.alienwebshop.com> <1136619542.15229.19.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Organization: Video2Video Services - http://Www.Video2Video.Com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /dev/eth0 question - prefer reply in next 20mins X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 03:18:15 -0000 On Sat, 7 Jan 2006, Robert Slade wrote: > As the problem is with FC4 why not ask on their mailing list? > Rob Good point, and I apologize for the transgression. (With my PC off, I took out the NIC, tapped it, blew dust off it, rebooted and DSL worked fine! Go figure.) :) -- Peter Leftwich, Owner Video2Video Services Box 13692, La Jolla, CA, 92039, USA http://Www.Video2Video.Com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 04:34:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D38CD16A420 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 04:34:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9A4F43D45 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 04:34:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k084cDP53297; Sat, 7 Jan 2006 20:38:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: , Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 20:34:43 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <52231.71.37.238.58.1136553753.fusewebmail-19592@webmail.fusemail.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: script to monitor internet connection X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 04:34:52 -0000 what is this, dsl, cable, dialup modem? Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Brian John >Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 5:23 AM >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: script to monitor internet connection > > >Hello, >I would like to write a script to monitor my internet >connection status. >My home connection goes down fairly often and I would like to >get an idea >for just how often it goes down and if possible how long it >goes down for. > Could someone help me write a script that will check my >connection to the >internet and log whenever it goes down and possibly how long it >goes down >for? I want to have some evidence to give to my ISP that my >connection is >going down. > >Thanks > >/Brian >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.15/223 - Release >Date: 1/6/2006 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 04:39:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25B6616A420 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 04:39:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F67243D46 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 04:39:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k084eIP53311; Sat, 7 Jan 2006 20:40:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: , Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 20:36:48 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20060106161324.GS24383@math.jussieu.fr> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: FreeBSD on DL145G2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 04:39:26 -0000 Since these are new you need to return them to HP and exchange for a different server, or get your money back. Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Albert Shih >Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 8:13 AM >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: FreeBSD on DL145G2 > > >Hi all > >I've some big problem to install FreeBSD (actually 6.0) on my two new HP >DL145G2 with two AMD Opteron 248. > >When I boot the cd the system waiting very long time after >Waiting 5 sec to scsi settle (or something like that) >I have many message mpt0 time out (I've SCSI Disk) > >After that I can install (but I just see one disk and I've two >disk). But >when I reboot the system don't see the disk is bootable. > >Anyone have succefully install FreeBSD on DL145 G2 ? > >Lots of thanks. >-- >Albert SHIH >Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) >U.F.R. de Mathematiques. >Heure local/Local time: >Fri Jan 6 17:10:26 CET 2006 >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.15/223 - Release >Date: 1/6/2006 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 04:45:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6082916A420 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 04:45:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C905843D45 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 04:45:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k084mkP53343; Sat, 7 Jan 2006 20:48:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Robert Slade" , "Peter Leftwich" Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 20:45:16 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <1136619542.15229.19.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Importance: Normal Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: /dev/eth0 question - prefer reply in next 20mins X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 04:45:26 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Robert Slade >Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 11:39 PM >To: Peter Leftwich >Cc: questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: /dev/eth0 question - prefer reply in next 20mins > > >As the problem is with FC4 why not ask on their mailing list? > He probably thinks the competence level on this list is higher. Kind of makes you wonder why he's running their OS. ;-) Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 04:51:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2280F16A420 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 04:51:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8500343D45 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 04:51:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k084sfP53363; Sat, 7 Jan 2006 20:54:41 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Michael Bernstein" , "Robert Slade" , "jasonharback" Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 20:51:10 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <019f01c613d4$c3a39530$7d026496@montana9> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Sparc vs i386 architecture X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 04:51:26 -0000 What machine code exploits currently exist for FreeBSD on the i386 other than the F00F bug, which has already been patched out? I wasn't aware of any. Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Michael >Bernstein >Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2006 1:53 PM >To: Robert Slade; jasonharback >Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Sparc vs i386 architecture > > >Hi group, I was just wondering if there's an advantage to >running FreeBSD on >a SPARC than compared with a regular PC. Obviously the architecture is >different (CISC vs RISC). How ever you can purchase a higher >powered PC box >for less money than it would cost for a SPARC. > >The main advantage I'm seeing here is for security. It's going >to be harder >to break into a SPARC running FreeBSD than an Intel/Amd running >FreeBSD b/c >most machine code exploits will be for the i386 type architecture. > >Any insights are much appreciated. > >Michael > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Robert Slade" >To: "jasonharback" >Cc: >Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2006 2:43 AM >Subject: Re: Sparc dual boot problems > > >> On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 03:47, jasonharback wrote: >> > Here's the situation >> > >> > >> > >> > The machine is a SUN ULTRA 5 and I have 4 IDE devices. I am >new to SUN >hardware I know much more about PC's. The first device primary >master is >the cdrom which Solaris 10 and FreeBSD were successfully installed from. >Currently Solaris 10 which is the primary slave is the default >boot device. >FreeBSD is installed on the primary slave drive. I am used to >the FreeBSD >install on a PC and during that install it gave time for configuring the >boot loader but I can't find it on the recent Sparc FreeBSD >edition? During >the partition process it says I will have the option to >configure the boot >loader latter. Right now I can't boot FreeBSD and I have no idea how to >configure this machine to make it dual boot? I would like to >have Solaris >10 as the primary O/S, FreeBSD as the secondary and Sparc Linux >on the third >hd. >> > >> > >> > >> > Can you please help? >> > >> > Jason Harback >> >> Jason, >> >> You don't need to use a boot loader with the U5, just boot to >the promt >> (Stop A). Then just type boot followed by the alias of the slice you >> want to boot. >> >> Rob >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.15/223 - Release >Date: 1/6/2006 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 05:03:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F74516A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 05:03:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1897843D45 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 05:03:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k08571P53410; Sat, 7 Jan 2006 21:07:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Robert Slade" Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 21:03:30 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <1136618623.15229.17.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Importance: Normal Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Spamcop listed - need help to diagnose why X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 05:03:38 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Robert Slade >Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 11:24 PM >To: David Banning >Cc: questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: Spamcop listed - need help to diagnose why > > > >There is your problem TMDA is most likely the cause. Such programmes are >in effect adding to the spam problem. Nearly all spam has a forged from >address and all programmes such as TMDA do is send a challenge to an >innocent 3rd party. Whist it looks like it reduces your spam all you do >is in effect spam someone else. When your e-mail address has been used >in a spam run by a spammer and you start getting 10s of these challenge >an hour it is quite easy to report 1 my accident. If you look at the >Spamcop reporting page you will see a warning about just this situation. > >I suppose that the real answer is to stop compounding the spam problem >and use a combination of spamassassin and block lists. > >BTW I make it a point never to respond to challenges. > Ditto, and for the same reasons. I've removed David from the cc list on this for that reason as well. Also we need to be aware of another trick that spammers have figured out, that applies to anyone running multiple MX records on a domain (I don't know if David is in that situation) Normally if a domain has a single mailserver processing incoming mail, there's a single MX record pointing to a single machine. But in many cases it's desirable to relay mail through a prefilter system before it gets to the actual mailserver. In those cases a common trick is to block the highest priority MX host off with an access list. Senders try the highest priority, it fails, they then go to the next highest priority host which is the relay host. That host gets it, does it's thing, then tries to send it to the highest priority server which should work since the access list permits that server. This technique has been mentioned in the sendmail book among others. The problem is what spammers are doing now is they find one of these hosts, and pump millions of messages to the secondary, with the VICTIM address as the senders address, and a bogus address as the recipient address. The secondary gets the mail, and tries relaying it to the primary, the primary rejects the mail as user-not-found and the secondary tries to return the message to the sender - which is the victim address. So the spam targets get messages from mailer-daemon that originate from a legitimate host, but are spam. It's a warzone out there, folks. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 05:59:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0356116A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 05:59:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bill@wiliweld.com) Received: from typhoon.he.net (typhoon.he.net [64.62.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B64CF43D45 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 05:59:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bill@wiliweld.com) Received: from liam.billschoolcraft.com ([63.204.157.14]) by typhoon.he.net for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2006 21:59:19 -0800 Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 21:59:22 -0800 (PST) From: Bill Schoolcraft X-X-Sender: bill@liam.billschoolcraft.com To: Peter Leftwich In-Reply-To: <20060107221637.F71629@rocket.alienwebshop.com> Message-ID: References: <55334.63.109.229.13.1136594923.squirrel@webmail.alienwebshop.com> <1136619542.15229.19.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> <20060107221637.F71629@rocket.alienwebshop.com> System-ID: [en] (SuSE-9.3 64-bit) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Robert Slade Subject: Re: /dev/eth0 question - prefer reply in next 20mins X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 05:59:25 -0000 At Sat, 7 Jan 2006 it looks like Peter Leftwich composed: > On Sat, 7 Jan 2006, Robert Slade wrote: > > As the problem is with FC4 why not ask on their mailing list? > > Rob > > Good point, and I apologize for the transgression. > > (With my PC off, I took out the NIC, tapped it, blew dust off it, rebooted and > DSL worked fine! Go figure.) > I've had instances where if a machine is a dual boot that one has to clear the previous systems (residual) settings by powering off, then back on. Soft (re)booting from one OS to the other would not clear the nic of prior settings. Hope that helps. -- Bill Schoolcraft PO Box 210076 San Francisco, CA 94121 "UNIX, A Way of Life." http://billschoolcraft.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 06:45:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF56A16A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 06:45:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40A9F43D45 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 06:45:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E42E62C8AF for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 02:45:47 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 65896-03 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 02:45:47 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-222-82-85.eastlink.ca [24.222.82.85]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B00B62C860 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 02:45:47 -0400 (AST) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 02A3346FB4; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 02:45:47 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01E8C3A9DC for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 02:45:47 -0400 (AST) Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 02:45:46 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060108023655.H1088@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org Subject: Server vendor specific mailing lists ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 06:45:48 -0000 Not sure who best to send this to, but figured I'd send it publicly to see also if others think this idea might have merit ... Basically, I'm just about to take possession of my first HP server ... my biggest 'fear' is that HP doesn't support FreeBSD, but from posts I've seen here, that shouldn't be a problem ... what I'd love to see is a 'vendor specific' mailing list where ppl can more easily tap others brains for their experiences ... a "FreeBSD user support group for {IBM,HP,Dell} servers", that a FreeBSD user can turn to knowing that others on that list are using "their vendor of choice" for their servers ... Its hard to post to -questions, with the amount of volume that is in there, and keep track of things ... I'd like to be able to post about experiences with IFO, for instance, and how others running FreeBSD are avoiding (if they are?) using Windows for server monitoring, stuff like that ... Its not a "-stable vs -current" sort of thing ... nor an "-amd vs -i386" one ... its experiences with a specific server vendor ... Might be a good way of getting together groups of FreeBSDers looking to 'pressure' their various vendors-of-choice into supporting FreeBSD better also ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 07:00:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDD2316A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 07:00:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imran@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk) Received: from darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk (darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk [202.59.74.139]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3CCD43D45 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 07:00:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imran@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk) Received: from darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k07AGYv1002388 for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2006 15:16:34 +0500 (PKT) (envelope-from imran@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk) Received: (from root@localhost) by darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id k07AGXMc002387 for questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 7 Jan 2006 15:16:33 +0500 (PKT) (envelope-from imran) Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 15:16:33 +0500 (PKT) From: Imran Imtiaz Message-Id: <200601071016.k07AGXMc002387@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk> To: questions@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: freebsd.org email X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 07:00:42 -0000 Can I get an email address on @freebsd.org ? Regards, Imran Imtiaz From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 07:18:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF36016A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 07:18:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout4.cac.washington.edu (mxout4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F96643D49 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 07:18:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9]) by mxout4.cac.washington.edu (8.13.5+UW05.10/8.13.5+UW05.09) with ESMTP id k087IbWX017582 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2006 23:18:37 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.23] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.5+UW05.10/8.13.5+UW05.09) with ESMTP id k087IaWo032316 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Sat, 7 Jan 2006 23:18:37 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <2061F3AE-A704-4058-8C93-648D22919FEE@u.washington.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: FreeBSD Questions From: Garrett Cooper Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 23:19:29 -0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' Subject: System segfaulting / panicking a lot after kernel upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 07:18:39 -0000 Hello again, I've reinstalled FreeBSD 6.0 on my celeron box recently, and after a kernel upgrade my system seems to be segfaulting a lot during compilations and has panicked quite a few times. First thing that pops into my mind is bad RAM, but I also changed the CPU arch to pentium3 (which I thought was valid for my Tualatin 1.2 GHz Celeron), and upped the optimization level to -O2. Could that possibly have anything to do with the issues I am seeing? I also added quite a few modules to WITHOUT_MODULES, which I didn't think would cause a problem, but I'm not a pro at maneuvering around the FreeBSD kernel yet... Thanks in advance, -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 07:31:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C11816A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 07:31:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: from lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (mail.bathnetworks.com [84.92.24.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75DAC43D45 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 07:31:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: (qmail 24192 invoked by uid 510); 8 Jan 2006 07:34:40 +0000 Received: from 84.92.24.252 by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (envelope-from , uid 508) with qmail-scanner-1.24-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.87/1146. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.24-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-3.8/5.0):. Processed in 4.835806 secs); 08 Jan 2006 07:34:40 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.8 required=5.0 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: bsd@bathnetworks.com via lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.24-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-3.8/5.0):. Processed in 4.835806 secs Process 24185) Received: from mail.bathnetworks.com (HELO ?84.92.24.252?) (bsd@bathnetworks.com@84.92.24.252) by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk with SMTP; 8 Jan 2006 07:34:34 +0000 From: Robert Slade To: Ted Mittelstaedt In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1136705674.23844.15.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 07:34:34 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Michael Bernstein , jasonharback , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: RE: Sparc vs i386 architecture X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 07:31:31 -0000 On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 04:51, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > What machine code exploits currently exist for FreeBSD on the i386 > other than the F00F bug, which has already been patched out? > I wasn't aware of any. > > Ted > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Michael > >Bernstein > >Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2006 1:53 PM > >To: Robert Slade; jasonharback > >Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >Subject: Sparc vs i386 architecture > > > > > >Hi group, I was just wondering if there's an advantage to > >running FreeBSD on > >a SPARC than compared with a regular PC. Obviously the architecture is > >different (CISC vs RISC). How ever you can purchase a higher > >powered PC box > >for less money than it would cost for a SPARC. > > > >The main advantage I'm seeing here is for security. It's going > >to be harder > >to break into a SPARC running FreeBSD than an Intel/Amd running > >FreeBSD b/c > >most machine code exploits will be for the i386 type architecture. > > > >Any insights are much appreciated. > > > >Michael > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > >From: "Robert Slade" > >To: "jasonharback" > >Cc: > >Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2006 2:43 AM > >Subject: Re: Sparc dual boot problems > > > > > >> On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 03:47, jasonharback wrote: > >> > Here's the situation > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > The machine is a SUN ULTRA 5 and I have 4 IDE devices. I am > >new to SUN > >hardware I know much more about PC's. The first device primary > >master is > >the cdrom which Solaris 10 and FreeBSD were successfully installed from. > >Currently Solaris 10 which is the primary slave is the default > >boot device. > >FreeBSD is installed on the primary slave drive. I am used to > >the FreeBSD > >install on a PC and during that install it gave time for configuring the > >boot loader but I can't find it on the recent Sparc FreeBSD > >edition? During > >the partition process it says I will have the option to > >configure the boot > >loader latter. Right now I can't boot FreeBSD and I have no idea how to > >configure this machine to make it dual boot? I would like to > >have Solaris > >10 as the primary O/S, FreeBSD as the secondary and Sparc Linux > >on the third > >hd. > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Can you please help? > >> > > >> > Jason Harback > >> > >> Jason, > >> > >> You don't need to use a boot loader with the U5, just boot to > >the promt > >> (Stop A). Then just type boot followed by the alias of the slice you > >> want to boot. > >> > >> Rob > >> Ted, Good point. However, in my case I'm using the sparc (its a U10) because it there. I originally got it as I needed to find out about Solaris/Sparc. It was lying in the back of a cupboard so when I started to investigate replacements for a domain based on W2k using FBSD I dusted it off and I'm using it for the BDC. The only thing I really noticed is the disk(s) are slow compared (SUN's IDE) to the PDC which has a fast scsi setup. Given the choice I think I would still go for a good sparc from Ebay over a i386. Rob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 08:10:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87D1E16A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 08:10:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@nezlok.unixathome.org) Received: from nezlok.unixathome.org (nezlok.unixathome.org [66.154.97.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F55243D46 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 08:10:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@nezlok.unixathome.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by nezlok.unixathome.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 664EA56CA for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 00:10:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from nezlok.unixathome.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (nezlok.unixathome.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 77050-08 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 00:10:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by nezlok.unixathome.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1E5C35627; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 00:10:02 -0800 (PST) From: Dan Langille To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20060108081002.1E5C35627@nezlok.unixathome.org> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 00:10:02 -0800 (PST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at unixathome.org Subject: The FreeBSD Diary: 2005-12-18 - 2006-01-07 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 08:10:17 -0000 The FreeBSD Diary contains a large number of practical examples and how-to guides. This message is posted weekly to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with the aim of letting people know what's available on the website. Before you post a question here it might be a good idea to first search the mailing list archives and/or The FreeBSD Diary . These are the articles posted during this period: 29-Dec : What RAID-1 setup should I use for FreeBSD 6.0? This is the desciption http://freebsddiary.org/freebsd-6.0-disk-timings.php?2 28-Dec : FreeBSD 6.0-RC1 - yes, I know this is late The first step in cross-compiling http://freebsddiary.org/freebsd-6.0-rc1.php?2 22-Dec : Configuring IPsec on your XP Professional laptop You've done your FreeBSD, now do your XP http://freebsddiary.org/ipsec-wireless-xp.php?2 -- Dan Langille BSDCan - http://www.BSDCan.org/ - BSD Conference From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 09:07:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72D8416A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 09:07:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aeder@list.ru) Received: from f52.mail.ru (f52.mail.ru [194.67.57.87]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDDD543D45 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 09:07:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aeder@list.ru) Received: from mail by f52.mail.ru with local id 1EvWWo-00077Y-00; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 12:07:54 +0300 Received: from [85.192.48.50] by win.mail.ru with HTTP; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 12:07:54 +0300 From: =?koi8-r?Q?=E1=CC=C5=CB=D3=C1=CE=C4=D2=20=E4=C5=D2=C5=D7=D1=CE=CB=CF?= To: Lowell Gilbert Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19 X-Originating-IP: 10.0.1.5 via proxy [85.192.48.50] Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 12:07:54 +0300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Extremly interesting df output. Help, please. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?koi8-r?Q?=E1=CC=C5=CB=D3=C1=CE=C4=D2=20=E4=C5=D2=C5=D7=D1=CE=CB=CF?= List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 09:07:57 -0000 -----Original Message----- From: áÌÅËÓÁÎÄÒ äÅÒÅ×ÑÎËÏ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 11:19:30 +0300 Subject: Extremly interesting df output. Help, please. >> Hello All ! >> >> I'm using FreeBSD 5.4. >> >> Today i have received daily output from my home computer. >> That's it: >> >> Disk status: >> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on >> /dev/ad0s1a 253678 36946 196438 16% / >> devfs 1 1 0 100% /dev >> /dev/ad0s1d 9206302 -17592178674642 17592187144440 -207704820% /usr >> >> Immidiatly, i have connected to it and see the same numbers in df output. >> Yesterday output is OK. >> >> Yesterday the computer rebooted spontaneously, and processed with background fsck. >> >> Does anybody have the same expirience? >> >> Best regards, >> Alexander. >At least one bug with similar symptoms was fixed in later branches of FreeBSD. >Can you check whether this still happens on 6.0? After reboot the df output returns to normal: Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/ad0s1a 253678 35874 197510 15% / devfs 1 1 0 100% /dev /dev/ad0s1d 9206302 7379230 1090568 87% /usr So the problem is solved. I can't repeat it, so can't check if it happends in 6.0 Best Regards, Alexander Derevianko. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 09:21:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 201D616A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 09:21:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: from chen.org.nz (chen.org.nz [210.54.19.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC94C43D48 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 09:21:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: by chen.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F16E05641C; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 22:21:33 +1300 (NZDT) Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 22:21:33 +1300 From: Jonathan Chen To: Imran Imtiaz Message-ID: <20060108092133.GA964@osiris.chen.org.nz> References: <200601071016.k07AGXMc002387@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200601071016.k07AGXMc002387@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd.org email X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 09:21:36 -0000 On Sat, Jan 07, 2006 at 03:16:33PM +0500, Imran Imtiaz wrote: > > Can I get an email address on @freebsd.org ? Sure! You just need to submit enough good code of quality. -- Jonathan Chen | To do is to be -- Nietzsche | To be is to do -- Sartre | Scooby do be do -- Scooby From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 09:41:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBC5A16A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 09:41:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ofsen@enderunix.org) Received: from istanbul.enderunix.org (freefall.marmara.edu.tr [193.140.143.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E742643D46 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 09:41:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ofsen@enderunix.org) Received: (qmail 77379 invoked by uid 89); 8 Jan 2006 09:41:20 -0000 X-Mail-Scanner: Scanned by qSheff 1.0-r4 (http://www.enderunix.org/qsheff/) Message-ID: <20060108094118.77369.qmail@istanbul.enderunix.org> From: Omer Faruk Sen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 11:41:18 +0200 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-9" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: multi port modem cards for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 09:41:03 -0000 Hi, I will install a fax server using hylafax on FreeBSD. This fax server must handle at least 8 fax-modem attached to it. For this I think I need a serial port multiplier or PCI based fax-modem cards which has at least 8 ports fax-modem chip. For FreeBSD 6.0 which hardware do I have to use for not having any driver specific problems. Can you recommend me one that works with hylafax and FreeBSD? Any suggestions? ----------------------- Omer Faruk Sen http://www.EnderUNIX.ORG Software Development Team @ Turkey http://www.Faruk.NET For Public key: http://www.enderunix.org/ofsen/ofsen.asc ******************************************************* AcikAcademy published a Turkish TCP/IP Book Acik Akademi'nin yeni kitabini duydunuz mu? http://www.acikakademi.com/catalog/tcpip/ Life is trouble.. Only Death is not! -Alexis Zorba From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 09:57:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3EA616A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 09:57:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ilyaver@mail.ru) Received: from mx2.mail.ru (mx2.mail.ru [194.67.23.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A01043D48 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 09:57:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ilyaver@mail.ru) Received: from [85.21.147.160] (port=1984 helo=UA0WONE34JO8YO8) by mx2.mail.ru with esmtp id 1EvXIT-000PHq-00; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 12:57:09 +0300 Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 12:56:55 +0300 From: Ilya E Veretenkin X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.0) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1806208098.20060108125655@mail.ru> To: Chuck Swiger In-Reply-To: <43C072E6.6020603@mac.com> References: <1388036653.20060108013522@mail.ru> <43C072E6.6020603@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re[2]: freebsd 6 - amount of total visible memory is decreasing constantly X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Ilya E Veretenkin List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 09:57:11 -0000 >> Problem: Total amount of visible memory is decreasing constantly > [ ... ] >> As you can see, memory which was visible using top utility decreased >> from 3224 to 3195 Megabytes in less than 2 hours. And this process >> will continue to the point, where swapping begins. >> Server during this monitoring was running MySql4 + Apache1.3 under heavy >> load. > Pay attention to "sysctl kern.malloc" or "sysctl vm.zone" periodicly, and see > whether some part of the kernel is leaking memory. All seems to be OK with 'sysctl kern.malloc' and 'sysctl vm.zone': there are no any suspiciously high values. All of kern.malloc values in MemUse field are <=1024K. Only two: SWAP=2189K and devbuf=8003K are above 1024K limit(but this seems to be ok too) What is the source of information which is used by 'top' utility for displaying memory statistics? May be, if I look into this source, I would probably get more clear picture of what is going on? Here is the kern.malloc output: kern.malloc: Type InUse MemUse HighUse Requests Size(s) linux 10 1K - 10 64 DEVFS 9 1K - 10 16,256 atkbddev 2 1K - 2 64 DEVFS3 121 31K - 122 256 nexusdev 2 1K - 2 16 DEVFS1 111 56K - 111 512 I/O APIC 3 3K - 3 512,2048 USB 32 5K - 32 16,32,64,128,256,512 memdesc 1 4K - 1 4096 USBdev 3 2K - 9 16,512 VM pgdata 2 129K - 2 128 entropy 1024 64K - 1024 64 PCI Link 30 3K - 30 16,128 UMAHash 3 133K - 15 512,1024,2048,4096 UFS mount 12 78K - 12 512,2048,4096 UFS dirhash 378 86K - 897 16,32,64,128,256,512,2048,4096 pagedep 10 130K - 13498 128 inodedep 94 536K - 193143 256 newblk 1 1K - 998678 64,512 bmsafemap 9 1K - 23038 64 allocdirect 40 5K - 721507 128 indirdep 7 1K - 14771 64 allocindir 20 3K - 277170 128 freefrag 3 1K - 469886 64 freeblks 15 4K - 58943 256 freefile 17 2K - 113514 64 diradd 52 4K - 120056 64 mkdir 0 0K - 782 64 dirrem 16 1K - 120272 64 newdirblk 0 0K - 112 32 savedino 0 0K - 65214 256 p1003.1b 1 1K - 1 16 NFS daemon 1 1K - 1 512 syncache 1 12K - 1 hostcache 1 48K - 1 IpFw/IpAcct 3 1K - 3 64,128 in_multi 3 1K - 3 64 routetbl 148 67K - 2489 32,64,128,256,512 lo 1 1K - 1 32 arpcom 2 1K - 2 32 clone 4 16K - 4 4096 ifnet 4 7K - 4 512,2048 ifaddr 27 8K - 27 32,64,512,4096 ether_multi 12 1K - 14 16,64 BPF 3 1K - 3 128 mount 81 9K - 156 16,32,64,128,256,1024,2048 vnodes 1 1K - 1 256 VFS hash 1 512K - 1 cluster_save buffer 0 0K - 99819 64,128 vfscache 1 1024K - 1 BIO buffer 0 0K - 2004 2048 acpidev 74 5K - 74 64 soname 6 1K - 6490905 16,32,128 pcb 20 9K - 3714 16,32,64,128,4096 mbuf_tag 0 0K -156956650 32,64 ptys 7 2K - 7 256 ttys 1057 155K - 231047 128,1024 shm 1 16K - 1 sem 4 8K - 4 1024,2048,4096 msg 4 30K - 4 2048,4096 ioctlops 0 0K - 964986 16,32,64,256,512,1024,2048,4096 iov 23 3K - 96143176 16,32,64,128,256 Unitno 12 1K - 2749506 32,64 turnstiles 997 125K - 2437 128 taskqueue 6 2K - 6 256 CAM periph 1 1K - 1 256 sleep queues 997 63K - 2437 64 sbuf 0 0K - 3588 16,32,64,128,256,512,1024,2048,4096 CAM SIM 1 1K - 1 128 rman 173 22K - 604 16,128 CAM queue 3 1K - 3 16 acpisem 23 3K - 23 128 kobj 177 708K - 220 4096 CAM dev queue 1 1K - 1 128 eventhandler 31 4K - 31 64,256 devstat 22 45K - 22 32,4096 bus 886 74K - 20021 16,32,64,128,256,1024 bus-sc 74 82K - 2645 16,32,64,128,256,512,1024,2048,4096 SWAP 2 2189K - 2 64 umtx 996 125K - 2436 128 sysctl 0 0K - 63007 16,32,64 sysctloid 2898 142K - 2898 16,32,64,128 sysctltmp 0 0K - 7826 16,32,128 plimit 19 5K - 31386 256 uidinfo 6 9K - 230 64 cred 100 25K - 14498036 256 pgrp 26 4K - 4650 128 session 25 7K - 3120 256 proc 2 64K - 2 subproc 530 857K - 179051 512,4096 mtx_pool 1 12K - 1 module 294 37K - 295 128 devbuf 1030 8003K - 1032 16,32,64,128,256,512,1024,2048,4096 temp 30 282K - 43951376 16,32,64,128,256,512,1024,2048,4096 ACD driver 1 2K - 1 2048 lockf 4 1K - 930566 128 linker 68 12K - 88 16,32,64,256,512,1024,2048 AR driver 1 1K - 5 512,1024 KTRACE 100 13K - 100 128 ATA DMA 6 2K - 6 256 ithread 60 13K - 62 128,256 AD driver 4 1K - 4 32 zombie 1 1K - 178522 256 proc-args 27 2K - 70601 16,32,64,128,256 kqueue 0 0K - 4062 512,2048 kenv 53 10K - 54 16,32,64 file desc 248 181K - 309852 16,32,64,128,256,512,1024,2048,4096 sigio 1 1K - 51 64 ATA generic 5 5K - 5 1024 acpitask 0 0K - 3 64 cdev 22 6K - 22 256 acpica 1573 159K - 60729 16,32,64,128,256,512,1024 CAM XPT 10 1K - 17 32,128,512 acpi_perf 2 1K - 2 128 isadev 7 1K - 7 128 GEOM 204 43K - 1269 16,32,64,128,256,512,1024,2048,4096 pfs_nodes 49 7K - 49 128 NTFS nthash 1 512K - 1 -- Ñ óâàæåíèåì, Ilya mailto:ilyaver@mail.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 10:43:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D05916A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 10:43:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-3-1-cust208.cdif.cable.ntl.com [82.31.78.208]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCC0743D45 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 10:43:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrir.wireless.private.submonkey.net ([192.168.11.23]) by shrike.submonkey.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1EvY1Q-000Fqd-TE; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 10:43:40 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-1--503973840" Message-Id: <9270E4E0-F4E9-4F2E-BCF0-DBF360E16D53@submonkey.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ceri Davies Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 10:43:35 +0000 To: Ted Mittelstaedt X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.1 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Robert Slade Subject: Re: Spamcop listed - need help to diagnose why X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 10:43:43 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-1--503973840 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On 8 Jan 2006, at 05:03, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Robert Slade >> Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 11:24 PM >> To: David Banning >> Cc: questions@freebsd.org >> Subject: Re: Spamcop listed - need help to diagnose why >> >> >> >> There is your problem TMDA is most likely the cause. Such >> programmes are >> in effect adding to the spam problem. Nearly all spam has a forged >> from >> address and all programmes such as TMDA do is send a challenge to an >> innocent 3rd party. Whist it looks like it reduces your spam all >> you do >> is in effect spam someone else. When your e-mail address has been >> used >> in a spam run by a spammer and you start getting 10s of these >> challenge >> an hour it is quite easy to report 1 my accident. If you look at the >> Spamcop reporting page you will see a warning about just this >> situation. >> >> I suppose that the real answer is to stop compounding the spam >> problem >> and use a combination of spamassassin and block lists. >> >> BTW I make it a point never to respond to challenges. >> > > Ditto, and for the same reasons. I've removed David from the cc > list on this for that reason as well. > > Also we need to be aware of another trick that spammers have > figured out, that applies to anyone running multiple MX records on > a domain (I don't know if David is in that situation) > > Normally if a domain has a single mailserver processing incoming > mail, there's a single MX record pointing to a single machine. But > in many cases it's desirable to relay mail through a prefilter system > before it gets to the actual mailserver. In those cases a common > trick is to block the highest priority MX host off with an access > list. Senders try the highest priority, it fails, they then go to > the next highest priority host which is the relay host. That host > gets it, does it's thing, then tries to send it to the highest > priority server which should work since the access list permits that > server. This technique has been mentioned in the sendmail book > among others. Yes, but that is actually massively rude. The hosts listed in a domain's MX record are supposed to be hosts willing to exchange mail for that domain, so listing ones that are not it just wasting everyone's time and resources. If you want to have such a prefilter system, there is no need to list the end system in the MX records; just use an internal route to do that. Ceri --Apple-Mail-1--503973840 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDwOzYme8yCsQvJJ0RAvUIAKCYJRMIRU/Vk2gC8Gh6Z4JumrWIswCgnGkk LLcFU8zJ0FO1mkEbAPXy8is= =AV8+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-1--503973840-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 12:14:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E96EB16A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 12:14:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imran@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk) Received: from darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk (darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk [202.59.74.139]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C6E743D77 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 12:14:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imran@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk) Received: from darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k08CD1fq031145 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:13:01 +0500 (PKT) (envelope-from imran@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk) Received: (from root@localhost) by darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id k08CD1pQ031144 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:13:01 +0500 (PKT) (envelope-from imran) Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:13:01 +0500 (PKT) From: Imran Imtiaz Message-Id: <200601081213.k08CD1pQ031144@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: saving wireless setting X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 12:14:12 -0000 How can I save the setting of my wireless lan card e.g ip, ssid etc cause every time i reboot my system i have to reconfigure my system. regards, Imran Imtiaz From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 12:14:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEFD516A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 12:14:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from reko.turja@liukuma.net) Received: from mxfep01.bredband.com (mxfep01.bredband.com [195.54.107.70]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBEEC43D49 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 12:14:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from reko.turja@liukuma.net) Received: from moria.endor.swagman.org ([213.113.4.147] [213.113.4.147]) by mxfep01.bredband.com with ESMTP id <20060108121421.FXOH17450.mxfep01.bredband.com@moria.endor.swagman.org>; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 13:14:21 +0100 Received: from rivendell (rivendell.endor.swagman.org [192.168.10.10]) by moria.endor.swagman.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B07C91141A; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 14:13:37 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <063801c6144d$13883a10$0a0aa8c0@endor.swagman.org> From: "Reko Turja" To: References: <1554.128.193.140.252.1136656861.squirrel@www.forestinformatics.com> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 14:14:29 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: good blogging port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 12:14:33 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Derek Musselmann" To: Cc: Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2006 8:47 PM Subject: Re: good blogging port? > The best blogging software for php/pgsql in my opinion is > Serendipity. It has a great plugin architecture and works very well. > Serendipidy seconded. Additional bonus is keeping the system completely Stallman-free ;) -Reko From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 13:36:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01DDA16A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 13:36:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9831943D45 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 13:36:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 3276 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2006 13:36:49 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 8 Jan 2006 13:36:48 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id EABD328420; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 08:36:47 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Imran Imtiaz References: <200601051448.k05EmV6d002737@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 08 Jan 2006 08:36:47 -0500 In-Reply-To: <200601051448.k05EmV6d002737@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk> Message-ID: <443bjy4z9s.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 17 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: internet on two lan cards X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 13:36:50 -0000 Imran Imtiaz writes: > I have three lan cards on my system on which two lan cards have the > alive ip now what i want is that how can i gave them different > gateways cause i want some traffic to be passed from one lan card > (one internet connection of isp) and some other traffic to be passed > from other lan card (internet of other companies isp) how is it > possibe this is some sort of load balancing ? There are many approaches; what applies to your case depends on your specific requirements. Such things have been discussed heavily; see the archives of the mailing list. If it handles your situation, just setting routes for specific destinations is the easiest solution. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 13:38:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFC1516A422 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 13:38:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 726B043D5A for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 13:38:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 13687 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2006 13:38:31 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail2.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 8 Jan 2006 13:38:30 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 3C63928420; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 08:38:30 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com References: From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 08 Jan 2006 08:38:30 -0500 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <44y81q3kmh.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 11 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: turning off IPv6 in kernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 13:38:37 -0000 "fbsd_user" writes: > if I comment out the ipv6net statement in the kernel source and recompile, > how do I tell ipfilter and the ports not to include ipv6 support? make.conf(5) has a knob for this, but individual ports may have their own separate knobs. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 14:12:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3325116A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 14:12:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from nagual.st (cc20684-a.assen1.dr.home.nl [82.74.2.186]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A9D643D46 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 14:12:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dick@nagual.st) Received: from arwen.nagual.st (arwen.nagual.st [192.168.11.29]) by nagual.st with esmtp; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 15:12:40 +0100 id 00039824.43C11DD8.0000763F Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 15:12:40 +0100 From: dick hoogendijk To: fbsdq Message-Id: <20060108151240.6ba8b372.dick@nagual.st> In-Reply-To: <1266887f6d11.43c01a1d@broadpark.no> References: <1266887f6d11.43c01a1d@broadpark.no> Organization: de nagual X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.2.0beta2 (GTK+ 2.8.9; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: good blogging port? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 14:12:43 -0000 On Sat, 07 Jan 2006 19:44:29 +0100 Kristian Vaaf wrote: > www.textpattern.com -- by far the best CMS. True! But as you may well know, textpattern is far more than blog software. It's what the name says: content management system. It does a great job though. I dropped wordpress for it ;-) -- dick -- http://nagual.st/ -- PGP/GnuPG key: F86289CE ++ Running FreeBSD 6.0 ++ The Power to Serve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 14:37:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C6C216A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 14:37:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33313.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33313.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.128]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5BDC243D46 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 14:37:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 77425 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Jan 2006 14:37:51 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Pv5Z1eh5MW2dMgvgagBieK2eodtT8FRFXG+fRuo9z6Eck3PFQbFIE2dJdtzMzeuB65d3DFUmPw6fsmLtY6eui08D4RhyxQeLrJOvyiPVMPDX3hxjdhfvfM12xJ7VpAsciHgrvuYX2V4RLIQQ6v6jgPMAHN691xiiktOwQeomkHM= ; Message-ID: <20060108143751.77423.qmail@web33313.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33313.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 06:37:51 PST Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 06:37:51 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: Robert Slade , Ted Mittelstaedt In-Reply-To: <1136705674.23844.15.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Michael Bernstein , jasonharback , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: RE: Sparc vs i386 architecture X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 14:37:53 -0000 --- Robert Slade wrote: > On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 04:51, Ted Mittelstaedt > wrote: > > What machine code exploits currently exist > for FreeBSD on the i386 > > other than the F00F bug, which has already > been patched out? > > I wasn't aware of any. > > > > Ted > > > > >-----Original Message----- > > >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > > >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On > Behalf Of Michael > > >Bernstein > > >Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2006 1:53 PM > > >To: Robert Slade; jasonharback > > >Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > > >Subject: Sparc vs i386 architecture > > > > > > > > >Hi group, I was just wondering if there's an > advantage to > > >running FreeBSD on > > >a SPARC than compared with a regular PC. > Obviously the architecture is > > >different (CISC vs RISC). How ever you can > purchase a higher > > >powered PC box > > >for less money than it would cost for a > SPARC. > > > > > >The main advantage I'm seeing here is for > security. It's going > > >to be harder > > >to break into a SPARC running FreeBSD than > an Intel/Amd running > > >FreeBSD b/c > > >most machine code exploits will be for the > i386 type architecture. > > > > > >Any insights are much appreciated. > > > > > >Michael > > > > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > >From: "Robert Slade" > > >To: "jasonharback" > > > >Cc: > > >Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2006 2:43 AM > > >Subject: Re: Sparc dual boot problems > > > > > > > > >> On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 03:47, jasonharback > wrote: > > >> > Here's the situation > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > The machine is a SUN ULTRA 5 and I have > 4 IDE devices. I am > > >new to SUN > > >hardware I know much more about PC's. The > first device primary > > >master is > > >the cdrom which Solaris 10 and FreeBSD were > successfully installed from. > > >Currently Solaris 10 which is the primary > slave is the default > > >boot device. > > >FreeBSD is installed on the primary slave > drive. I am used to > > >the FreeBSD > > >install on a PC and during that install it > gave time for configuring the > > >boot loader but I can't find it on the > recent Sparc FreeBSD > > >edition? During > > >the partition process it says I will have > the option to > > >configure the boot > > >loader latter. Right now I can't boot > FreeBSD and I have no idea how to > > >configure this machine to make it dual boot? > I would like to > > >have Solaris > > >10 as the primary O/S, FreeBSD as the > secondary and Sparc Linux > > >on the third > > >hd. > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > Can you please help? > > >> > > > >> > Jason Harback > > >> > > >> Jason, > > >> > > >> You don't need to use a boot loader with > the U5, just boot to > > >the promt > > >> (Stop A). Then just type boot followed by > the alias of the slice you > > >> want to boot. > > >> > > >> Rob > > >> > > Ted, > > Good point. However, in my case I'm using the > sparc (its a U10) because > it there. I originally got it as I needed to > find out about > Solaris/Sparc. It was lying in the back of a > cupboard so when I started > to investigate replacements for a domain based > on W2k using FBSD I > dusted it off and I'm using it for the BDC. The > only thing I really > noticed is the disk(s) are slow compared (SUN's > IDE) to the PDC which > has a fast scsi setup. Given the choice I think > I would still go for a > good sparc from Ebay over a i386. > > Rob Frankly, people who spend $9000. worth of time dicking around with some old piece of junk to avoid buying a $400. computer crack me up. :) __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 14:41:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B030516A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 14:41:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07E0A43D62 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 14:41:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Evbiz-0004KN-OC for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 15:40:49 +0100 Received: from c-24-147-87-49.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([24.147.87.49]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 15:40:49 +0100 Received: from jdarnold by c-24-147-87-49.hsd1.ma.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 15:40:49 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: JD Arnold Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 09:40:59 -0500 Organization: Amazing Developments Lines: 53 Message-ID: References: <200601021656.33323.nb_root@videotron.ca> <20060103155314.11865.qmail@web33315.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20060107213816.GA2286@flame.pc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-24-147-87-49.hsd1.ma.comcast.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) In-Reply-To: <20060107213816.GA2286@flame.pc> Sender: news Subject: Re: Programming Book(s) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 14:41:20 -0000 Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2006-01-07 15:25, JD Arnold wrote: >> Danial Thom wrote: >>> --- Nicolas Blais wrote: >>>> On January 2, 2006 04:52 pm, Sean wrote: >>>>> Sean wrote: >>>>>> Looking for recommendations on any Unix programming books. I have >>>>>> been out of things for a while so I would put my skill level back >>>>>> to the beginning. >>>>> I forgot to mention that I wish to work withC/C++ >>>> There's a free C++ book which is great: >>>> http://mindview.net/Books/TICPP/ThinkingInCPP2e.html >>>> You can also buy the hardcopy on Amazon. >>> I'd recommend learning C before C++. In order to be an effective unix >>> programmer you must master the C language, as you'll have to examine >>> and modify code in C to do anything substantial. Virtually all major >>> programs and kernels are 'C' based. >> I think, in general, this is wrong. > > I think, in general, this is right. > >> And I think many "professionals" also feel that learning C++ is the >> way to go. If you just learning, you might as well start with >> C++. For many good reasons, see Stroustrup's answer himself: >> >> http://public.research.att.com/~bs/learn.html > > Which essentially boils down to "learn C++ it's better and easier to > learn". I very much disagree, but this is another flamewar, I guess. > > Danial is right that there are many large programs out there that are > written in C, not C++. This means that just learning C++ and hoping to > "cope with it" when an 11,000,000-line monster, written in plain C, > comes along is just not going to cut it. > > Thus, "learn both" is a good answer, but I understand that this may be > quite impossible some times. Jeez, you make it sound like the difference between C and C++ is like the difference between learning English or learning Russian. I find it difficult, if not impossible. to believe that someone who knew C++ would be in any way shape or form be forced to "cope" with any gazillion line C program. They'd probably be itching to do it better and more safely, but if they were even the slightest bit proficient in C++, they'd know pretty quickly what was going on in any C program. And the opposite is absolutely not true. -- Jonathan Arnold (mailto:jdarnold@buddydog.org) Daemon Dancing in the Dark, a FreeBSD weblog: http://freebsd.amazingdev.com/blog/ UNIX is user-friendly. It's just a bit picky about who its friends are. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 14:50:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60AC016A420 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 14:50:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF0743D46 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 14:50:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EvbsM-0006HY-R4 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 15:50:30 +0100 Received: from c-24-147-87-49.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([24.147.87.49]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 15:50:30 +0100 Received: from jdarnold by c-24-147-87-49.hsd1.ma.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 15:50:30 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: JD Arnold Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 09:43:28 -0500 Organization: Amazing Developments Lines: 48 Message-ID: References: <20060108011528.GA4811@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> <20060108014603.26952.qmail@web33310.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-24-147-87-49.hsd1.ma.comcast.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) In-Reply-To: <20060108014603.26952.qmail@web33310.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Sender: news Subject: Re: Programming Book(s) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 14:50:34 -0000 Danial Thom wrote: > > --- "Michael P. Soulier" > wrote: > >> On 07/01/06 Jorge Biquez said: >> >>> Hello all. Very interesting comments and >> suggestions. >>> I hope my question does not seems too off >> topic. Do you think the path to >>> follow for developing applications for the >> new PDA, Smartphones, Ipaq and >>> similar devices it is the same? C or C++? I >> have some friends that said it >>> is the only way but I am not sure of that. >> Any experiences or comments.? >> >> With the kind of hardware that can be put into >> a device like that these days, >> it's hard to tell, but I tend to see C/C++. >> Occasionally I see Java, sometimes >> Python. >> >> There is no rule for this, you simply use the >> right tool for the job. >> > > Am I the only one that has noticed that virtually > everything written in Java sucks? I don't > understand why its used. Is having a program that > sucks on multiple platforms really an advantage > over having a program that is good on 1 or 2 > platforms? I really don't get it. You should read Joel Spotsky's diatribe against "Java Schools", where many colleges are stooping to teaching in Java, leaving most students woefully unprepared for the real world, and making it hard for someone to separate the wheat from the chaff when it comes to hiring: http://www.joelonsoftware.com/articles/ThePerilsofJavaSchools.html -- Jonathan Arnold (mailto:jdarnold@buddydog.org) Daemon Dancing in the Dark, a FreeBSD weblog: http://freebsd.amazingdev.com/blog/ UNIX is user-friendly. It's just a bit picky about who its friends are. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 14:56:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 861B916A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 14:56:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EACD643D5A for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 14:56:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k08Eu7tW023049; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 15:56:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k08Eu7gs023046; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 15:56:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 15:56:07 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: Omer Faruk Sen In-Reply-To: <20060108094118.77369.qmail@istanbul.enderunix.org> Message-ID: <20060108155448.H22903@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <20060108094118.77369.qmail@istanbul.enderunix.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: multi port modem cards for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 14:56:24 -0000 > I will install a fax server using hylafax on FreeBSD. This fax server must > handle at least 8 fax-modem attached to it. For this I think I need a serial > port multiplier or PCI based fax-modem cards which has at least 8 ports > fax-modem chip. For FreeBSD 6.0 which hardware do I have to use for not > having any driver specific problems. Can you recommend me one that works with > hylafax and FreeBSD? > Any suggestions? cheap multiport PCI cards works fine, at least for me (i have TITAN 800H). you may consider buying USB-RS232 or USB-doubleRS232 converters, or even better - USB modems. make sure your USB modem is "Hayes compatible" which simply means that behaves like serial modem with AT* commands From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 14:57:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AF9016A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 14:57:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EB4D43D48 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 14:57:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k08Ev52C023103; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 15:57:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k08Ev52K023100; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 15:57:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 15:57:05 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: stheg olloydson In-Reply-To: <20060107233207.11187.qmail@web32705.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20060108155621.H22903@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <20060107233207.11187.qmail@web32705.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: FreeBSD ftpd & Windows compatibility X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 14:57:11 -0000 >> are there any solutions? > > As this is a FreeBSD list, you may not get useful answers to > questions about how to use various third-party Windows > applications. Maybe asking the companies that sold you the i do not want to get answer about windows. i just would like what's the difference between FreeBSD ftpd and NetBSD ftpd and proftpd that only first make that problem. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 15:01:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5737D16A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 15:01:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 358A343D62 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 15:00:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k08F0bcl023349; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 16:00:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k08F0acA023346; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 16:00:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 16:00:36 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: Michael Bernstein In-Reply-To: <019f01c613d4$c3a39530$7d026496@montana9> Message-ID: <20060108155751.H22903@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <000601c6133d$0c463ba0$6500a8c0@ctusf.org> <1136619829.15229.23.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> <019f01c613d4$c3a39530$7d026496@montana9> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: jasonharback , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Robert Slade Subject: Re: Sparc vs i386 architecture X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 15:01:03 -0000 > Hi group, I was just wondering if there's an advantage to running FreeBSD on > a SPARC than compared with a regular PC. Obviously the architecture is > different (CISC vs RISC). How ever you can purchase a higher powered PC box > for less money than it would cost for a SPARC. > user Opteron/Athlon64 - better than both :) AMD made RISC-like architecture that just runs i386-like code (i386+more registers and few extra instructions, while lots of mostly-unused instructions emulated). possible latest SUN processor may be comparable in speed at 100 times higher price :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 15:02:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19ECA16A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 15:02:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from smtp2.suscom.net (smtp2.suscom.net [64.78.83.231]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FEA943D55 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 15:02:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from localhost (smtp2.suscom.net [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.suscom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9242E1CD53C for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 09:59:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp2.suscom.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13720-09 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 09:59:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from seibercom.net (ip148.217.susc.suscom.net [216.45.217.148]) by smtp2.suscom.net (Postfix) with SMTP id D527A1CD64B for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 09:59:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (budman [192.168.0.2]) by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k08F1h0Y001293 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 10:01:43 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 10:01:43 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: gerard@seibercom.net Organization: Seibercom.net In-Reply-To: <20060108143751.77423.qmail@web33313.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <1136705674.23844.15.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> <20060108143751.77423.qmail@web33313.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20060108095843.F05E.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.24.01 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87.1, clamav-milter version 0.87 on seibercom.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at suscom.net Subject: Re: Sparc vs i386 architecture X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 15:02:16 -0000 Danial Thom > Frankly, people who spend $9000. worth of time > dicking around with some old piece of junk to > avoid buying a $400. computer crack me up. :) Yes, it is amassing. I have a friend who has spent thousands of dollars keeping his old car running. He could have purchased a new one with a new warranty, etc. and have saved all that money, but he refused. For some individuals, the challenge is the real thrill that they crave. -- Gerard Seibert gerard@seibercom.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 15:12:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B5A916A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 15:12:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7783C43D46 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 15:12:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k08FCewL024103 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 16:12:40 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k08FCetu024094 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 16:12:40 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 16:12:40 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060108095843.F05E.GERARD@seibercom.net> Message-ID: <20060108161125.P23970@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <1136705674.23844.15.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> <20060108143751.77423.qmail@web33313.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20060108095843.F05E.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Re: Sparc vs i386 architecture X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 15:12:46 -0000 > > Yes, it is amassing. I have a friend who has spent thousands of dollars > keeping his old car running. He could have purchased a new one with a > new warranty, etc. and have saved all that money, but he refused. For > some individuals, the challenge is the real thrill that they crave. and SUN itself sells AMD64 based machines with their solaris. Of course they won't say "Yes our SPARC processor isn't worth of buying and producing, because AMD made it better and much cheaper" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 15:43:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E45B16A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 15:43:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kiffin.gish@planet.nl) Received: from post-22.mail.nl.demon.net (post-22.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFC7B43D45 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 15:43:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kiffin.gish@planet.nl) Received: from gish.demon.nl ([83.160.27.223]:14338 helo=[192.168.1.33]) by post-22.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1Evchu-0005ki-CW for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 15:43:46 +0000 From: Kiffin Gish To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 16:43:49 +0100 Message-Id: <1136735029.820.2.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Which is the best open source C/C++ IDE out there? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 15:43:48 -0000 I've played around with Anjuta and Code::Blocks and was wondering what is the preferred open source C/C++ IDE available for advanced users. Pros and cons etc. would be greatly appreciated. -- Kiffin Gish From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 16:02:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D787C16A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 16:02:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0283243D5F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 16:02:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k08G29ng027504 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:02:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k08G29ou027501 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:02:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:02:09 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060108165904.A27239@chylonia.3miasto.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: rshd, rlogind, .rhosts question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 16:02:19 -0000 i use this widely with NetBSD and now try with FreeBSD rlogin/rlogind works the same - all OK. if host is entered in .rhosts then it logs in without password rsh -l login host command worked fine too in NetBSD same way - no asking for password if .rhosts consist of my host and user name. in FreeBSD rsh doesn't work that way, always ask for password. what's the difference? how to fix it? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 16:09:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ADB916A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 16:09:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8159F43D4C for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 16:08:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C48D5CFC; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 11:08:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 72077-03; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 11:08:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-122-227.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.122.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A50F05C9C; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 11:08:52 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43C13919.5070900@mac.com> Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 11:08:57 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Marc G. Fournier" References: <20060108023655.H1088@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20060108023655.H1088@ganymede.hub.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Server vendor specific mailing lists ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 16:09:00 -0000 Marc G. Fournier wrote: > Not sure who best to send this to, but figured I'd send it publicly to > see also if others think this idea might have merit ... > > Basically, I'm just about to take possession of my first HP server ... > my biggest 'fear' is that HP doesn't support FreeBSD, but from posts > I've seen here, that shouldn't be a problem ... what I'd love to see is > a 'vendor specific' mailing list where ppl can more easily tap others > brains for their experiences ... a "FreeBSD user support group for > {IBM,HP,Dell} servers", that a FreeBSD user can turn to knowing that > others on that list are using "their vendor of choice" for their servers > ... FreeBSD attempts to support all reasonably functional hardware; there isn't a great deal of difference between a Dell and an HP except for which RAID system and NIC they come with. You might find that mentioning the specific model you have would produce more useful feedback. You might also find asking the freebsd-isp list would produce responses more oriented towards people rackrounting and using LOM/remote management tools... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 16:13:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C95AF16A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 16:13:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CCF643D48 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 16:13:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4B5A5D02; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 11:13:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 57432-04; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 11:13:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-122-227.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.122.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D5025CFC; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 11:13:08 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43C13A19.3050707@mac.com> Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 11:13:13 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wojciech Puchar References: <20060108165904.A27239@chylonia.3miasto.net> In-Reply-To: <20060108165904.A27239@chylonia.3miasto.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rshd, rlogind, .rhosts question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 16:13:09 -0000 Wojciech Puchar wrote: > i use this widely with NetBSD and now try with FreeBSD > > rlogin/rlogind works the same - all OK. if host is entered in .rhosts > then it logs in without password > > rsh -l login host command worked fine too in NetBSD same way - no asking > for password if .rhosts consist of my host and user name. > > in FreeBSD rsh doesn't work that way, always ask for password. > > what's the difference? how to fix it? FreeBSD's rsh may really be ssh? In any event, use ssh-keygen to set up some keys, and copy them to authorized_keys, and use that to permit password-less login between machines securely. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 17:05:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD2D816A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:05:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lonstein@beryl.lonsteins.com) Received: from feldspar.lonsteins.com (feldspar.lonsteins.com [216.254.100.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0135843D45 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:05:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lonstein@beryl.lonsteins.com) Received: (qmail 7046 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2006 17:05:51 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO beryl.lonsteins.com) (192.168.100.40) by feldspar.lonsteins.com with SMTP; 8 Jan 2006 17:05:51 -0000 Received: from beryl.lonsteins.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by beryl.lonsteins.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6CA0C105 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 12:04:34 -0500 (EST) Received: (from lonstein@localhost) by beryl.lonsteins.com (8.13.4/8.13.3/Submit) id k08H4YJO035552 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 12:04:34 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from lonstein) Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 12:04:34 -0500 From: Ross Lonstein To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060108170433.GA35310@beryl.lonsteins.com> References: <1136735029.820.2.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1136735029.820.2.camel@localhost> User-Agent: mutt-ng/devel-r445 (FreeBSD) Subject: Re: Which is the best open source C/C++ IDE out there? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:05:32 -0000 On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 04:43:49PM +0100, Kiffin Gish wrote: > I've played around with Anjuta and Code::Blocks and was wondering what > is the preferred open source C/C++ IDE available for advanced users. *cough* xemacs *cough* > Pros and cons etc. would be greatly appreciated. Flame away :) - Ross From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 17:13:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF75116A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:13:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38E0343D46 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:13:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 1582 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2006 17:13:26 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 8 Jan 2006 17:13:26 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 6ECD328420; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 12:13:25 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Robert Huff References: <17342.49804.954553.276173@jerusalem.litteratus.org> <17342.53734.323371.384471@jerusalem.litteratus.org> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 08 Jan 2006 12:13:25 -0500 In-Reply-To: <17342.53734.323371.384471@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Message-ID: <44r77i3aoa.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 42 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: hyperactive dhclient? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:13:27 -0000 Robert Huff writes: > Normally, I expect dhclient to run at startup and then > disappear into the background. > Today - in the process of diagnosing other troubles - I ran > into this from top: > > last pid: 48344; load averages: 3.30, 2.85, 2.46 up 0+19:50:53 14:17:04 > 127 processes: 3 running, 122 sleeping, 1 zombie, 1 lock > CPU states: 42.4% user, 12.5% nice, 42.4% system, 2.7% interrupt, 0.0% idle > Mem: 146M Active, 22M Inact, 100M Wired, 2560K Cache, 60M Buf, 222M Free > Swap: 2048M Total, 310M Used, 1738M Free, 15% Inuse, 156K In > > PID USERNAME THR PRI NICE SIZE RES STATE TIME WCPU COMMAND > 226 _dhcp 1 111 0 1528K 268K *Giant 31:04 12.74% dhclient > > > Now I assume "*Giant" means the Giant Lock ... which is another > thing I've never seen before. Not for dhclient, and not for > anything else. I don't think that tells you much other than that dhclient is waiting to acquire the giant lock. Which is probably for access to the network card -- my guess would be that you are using a NIC that hasn't been rewritten for fine-grained locking. > Gut reaction says this is not a good thing. On the other hand > my gut reaction has often been wrong. Is there a legitimate reason > for this much activity? If not, how do I figure out what's broken? > (I'm running > > FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #0: Wed Jan 4 13:41:21 EST 20 > > but this is as much a question about dhcp as it is about > any particular version.) Hard to say. I'd start by looking at the traffic it's sending and receiving. A clue is likely to turn up there... -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 17:27:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6045916A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:27:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from mail.storm.ca (mail.storm.ca [209.87.239.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE2D943D45 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:27:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from tigger.digitaltorque.ca (ppp-216-106-108-228.storm.ca [216.106.108.228]) by mail.storm.ca (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k08HR5J9002208 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 12:27:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from tigger.digitaltorque.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by tigger.digitaltorque.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01B8623DC5 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 12:26:59 -0500 (EST) Received: (from msoulier@localhost) by tigger.digitaltorque.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id k08HQw9x020896 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 12:26:58 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: tigger.digitaltorque.ca: msoulier set sender to msoulier@digitaltorque.ca using -f Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 12:26:58 -0500 From: "Michael P. Soulier" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060108172658.GB5646@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1136735029.820.2.camel@localhost> <20060108170433.GA35310@beryl.lonsteins.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="l76fUT7nc3MelDdI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060108170433.GA35310@beryl.lonsteins.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: Which is the best open source C/C++ IDE out there? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:27:10 -0000 --l76fUT7nc3MelDdI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 08/01/06 Ross Lonstein said: > *cough* xemacs *cough* Great OS, but he wanted an editor. ;-) > Flame away :) Hey, you asked for it. :) Mike --=20 Michael P. Soulier "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein --l76fUT7nc3MelDdI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDwUtiKGqCc1vIvggRAsoCAKCad+8ZMaZe0zMRLDxpkdoOqbhFvgCfa/HN cMocPp65NYLf8A0YzoHfH98= =jHc9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --l76fUT7nc3MelDdI-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 17:31:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 462EB16A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:31:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ryanfirst@sympatico.ca) Received: from toq11-srv.bellnexxia.net (toq11.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.118]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70F3A43D69 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:31:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ryanfirst@sympatico.ca) Received: from moreprivate ([70.50.93.219]) by tomts40-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20060108171459.CLWN5216.tomts40-srv.bellnexxia.net@moreprivate> for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 12:14:59 -0500 Received: from 127.0.0.1 (AVG SMTP 7.1.371 [267.14.15/223]); Sun, 08 Jan 2006 12:09:07 -0500 Message-ID: <001201c61476$3c038d40$6401a8c0@moreprivate> From: "RJ" To: Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 12:09:04 -0500 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="=======AVGMAIL-43C147333E33=======" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: premission denied executing a script X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:31:05 -0000 --=======AVGMAIL-43C147333E33======= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, =20 I'm testing a program that wasn't installed from ports, Xweb from = sourceforge. Anyway, whenever I try to execute the script using /bin, = ./bin, /full path/bin I get "permission denied even if I chown -R = root:wheel.=20 Where or, does the system log what the script is trying to do? I = can't find anything in my error logs. Regards --=======AVGMAIL-43C147333E33======= Content-Type: text/plain; x-avg=cert; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Content-Description: "AVG certification" No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.15/223 - Release Date: 06/01/2006 = --=======AVGMAIL-43C147333E33=======-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 17:37:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC4E916A420 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:37:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kiffin.gish@planet.nl) Received: from post-22.mail.nl.demon.net (post-22.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73BCA43D48 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:37:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kiffin.gish@planet.nl) Received: from gish.demon.nl ([83.160.27.223]:18485 helo=[192.168.1.33]) by post-22.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1EveTx-0003o8-No; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:37:30 +0000 From: Kiffin Gish To: "Michael P. Soulier" In-Reply-To: <20060108172658.GB5646@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> References: <1136735029.820.2.camel@localhost> <20060108170433.GA35310@beryl.lonsteins.com> <20060108172658.GB5646@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 18:37:33 +0100 Message-Id: <1136741853.1767.0.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which is the best open source C/C++ IDE out there? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:37:32 -0000 On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 12:26 -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote: > On 08/01/06 Ross Lonstein said: > > > *cough* xemacs *cough* > > Great OS, but he wanted an editor. ;-) > > > Flame away :) > > Hey, you asked for it. :) > > Mike Yes please: an editor plus integrated compile/build and debugger. -- Kiffin Gish From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 17:51:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE7A116A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:51:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-3-1-cust208.cdif.cable.ntl.com [82.31.78.208]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2883843D48 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:51:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrir.wireless.private.submonkey.net ([192.168.11.23]) by shrike.submonkey.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1EvehY-0002c8-QE; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:51:41 +0000 In-Reply-To: <001201c61476$3c038d40$6401a8c0@moreprivate> References: <001201c61476$3c038d40$6401a8c0@moreprivate> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) X-Priority: 3 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-2--478304061" Message-Id: <0E48B181-7B8D-4935-9FFE-7878F0BDF7CE@submonkey.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ceri Davies Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:51:25 +0000 To: RJ X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.1 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: premission denied executing a script X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 17:51:46 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-2--478304061 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On 8 Jan 2006, at 17:09, RJ wrote: > Hi, > > I'm testing a program that wasn't installed from ports, Xweb > from sourceforge. Anyway, whenever I try to execute the script > using /bin, ./bin, /full path/bin I get "permission denied even if > I chown -R root:wheel. The script probably doesn't have the execute bit set: try "chmod +x script.sh" or whatever. Ceri --Apple-Mail-2--478304061 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDwVEjme8yCsQvJJ0RAtSPAJ9oq7b94728XwsZUXgcIkIDmj4MkgCeKMIe sj3ntIxYKnioupE9xP9rK9Q= =nVoH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-2--478304061-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 18:06:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7B5816A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 18:06:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7C8643D46 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 18:06:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k08I5xSZ035195; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 19:06:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k08I5w1f035189; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 19:05:58 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 19:05:57 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: Chuck Swiger In-Reply-To: <43C13A19.3050707@mac.com> Message-ID: <20060108190536.P35144@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <20060108165904.A27239@chylonia.3miasto.net> <43C13A19.3050707@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rshd, rlogind, .rhosts question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 18:06:08 -0000 >> >> what's the difference? how to fix it? > > FreeBSD's rsh may really be ssh? In any event, use ssh-keygen to set up some > keys, and copy them to authorized_keys, and use that to permit password-less > login between machines securely. NO I MEAN RSH not ssh. and i DO use rsh/rlogin not ssh ssh works fine From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 18:17:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 465A816A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 18:17:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ryanfirst@sympatico.ca) Received: from tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net (tomts22.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.184]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8854243D45 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 18:17:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ryanfirst@sympatico.ca) Received: from moreprivate ([70.50.93.219]) by tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.13 201-253-122-130-113-20050324) with ESMTP id <20060108181727.LSTT16473.tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net@moreprivate>; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 13:17:27 -0500 Received: from 127.0.0.1 (AVG SMTP 7.1.371 [267.14.15/223]); Sun, 08 Jan 2006 13:11:07 -0500 Message-ID: <005f01c6147e$e5a88820$6401a8c0@moreprivate> From: "RJ" To: "Ceri Davies" References: <001201c61476$3c038d40$6401a8c0@moreprivate> <0E48B181-7B8D-4935-9FFE-7878F0BDF7CE@submonkey.net> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 13:11:07 -0500 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1409 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: premission denied executing a script X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 18:17:29 -0000 Thanks Ceri but, it didn't solve my problem. The script starts with "#!/usr/src/bin/sh" and I've tried changing it to "#!/bin/sh" (no quotes). The end result is still permission denied. Does the system log what the script is trying to do? I can't find anything so far. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ceri Davies" To: "RJ" Cc: Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2006 12:51 PM Subject: Re: premission denied executing a script -- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.15/223 - Release Date: 06/01/2006 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 18:18:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4692116A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 18:18:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: from smtp1.versatel.nl (smtp1.versatel.nl [62.58.50.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D0D143D5D for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 18:18:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 2502 invoked by uid 0); 8 Jan 2006 18:18:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.2.5]) ([62.59.173.176]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp1.versatel.nl (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for < >; 8 Jan 2006 18:18:04 -0000 Message-ID: <43C1577C.1000003@gmx.net> Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 19:18:36 +0100 From: Frank Staals User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20060105) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kiffin Gish References: <1136735029.820.2.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1136735029.820.2.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which is the best open source C/C++ IDE out there? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 18:18:10 -0000 Kiffin Gish wrote: >I've played around with Anjuta and Code::Blocks and was wondering what >is the preferred open source C/C++ IDE available for advanced users. > >Pros and cons etc. would be greatly appreciated. > > > What would be the best IDE can I nor anybody else on this list tell you, it's a matter of taste. Anyway: I think anjuta is a realy nice IDE, it has a lot of features and it runs pretty fast, so that would be my tip. You can also try Eclipse + CDT plugin, which also seems to be a great developement tool, I haven't used the CDT plugin, but I'm using eclipse for java and it works realy great, allthough Eclipse does require a fast computer. Good luck finding an IDE which YOU like, -- -Frank Staals From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 18:47:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F2D16A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 18:47:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nagylzs@freemail.hu) Received: from smtp.enternet.hu (smtp.enternet.hu [62.112.192.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F99843D45 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 18:47:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nagylzs@freemail.hu) Received: from [62.112.217.162] (helo=[172.16.0.26]) by smtp.enternet.hu with esmtpa (Exim 4) id 1EvfZK-000Iig-Uk; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 19:47:07 +0100 Message-ID: <43BEBB57.6060203@freemail.hu> Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 19:47:51 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?L=E1szl=F3_Nagy?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Andrew P." , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <43BCF512.3050601@freemail.hu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: pkg_add question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 18:47:11 -0000 Andrew P. wrote: >On 1/5/06, László Nagy wrote: > > >> Hello All, >> >>I tried to install the Xorg server and xfce4 from the binary >>distribution, using >> >>pkg_add -r >> >>I could setup the Xorg server, but I cannot use xfce. When I run >> >>startxfce4 >> >>then I get the following message: >> >>/libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libobject-2.0.so.0" not found, >>required by "xfce4-sesion". >> >>I read somewhere that I need to update glib. But I cannot do this with >>pkg_add. >> >>pkg_add -r glib >> >>tells me that glib (or an older version of it) is already installed. Now >>I'm trying to upgrade glib with >> >>portupgrade -r glib >> >>and probably it will work. But it will take a long time to recompile >>every package that I have in binary format. The big advantage of using >>pkg_add is that I do not need to recompile everything from the ports >>tree. I have a slow machine and limited disk space. But it looks like I >>have no choice. Upgrading glib from the ports will cause many packages >>to be downloaded and recompiled from source. I could not find any way to >>update my packages in binary form. If there is a way, please help me >>finding it. >> >>Thanks, >> >> Les >> >>_______________________________________________ >>freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> > >"portupgrade -PP" will only use binary packages. Try >portupagrade -aPP > > Whew! :-) You are my man! I'm going to use portupgrade instead of pkg_add, from this point. :-) Thank you! Les From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 18:49:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 465A116A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 18:49:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@digitalbluesky.net) Received: from harmony.digitalbluesky.net (dsl093-010-046.cle1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.10.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B771E43D45 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 18:49:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@digitalbluesky.net) Received: (qmail 4727 invoked by uid 0); 8 Jan 2006 18:49:48 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO willow.digitalbluesky.net) (steve@digitalbluesky.net@192.168.1.1) by harmony.digitalbluesky.net with SMTP; 8 Jan 2006 18:49:48 -0000 Message-Id: <6.2.1.2.0.20060108133151.02034088@mail.digitalbluesky.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.1.2 Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 13:49:04 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Steve Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Subject: dns lookups lagging server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 18:49:07 -0000 Hello, I've been running FreeBSD 5.3 on an Intel Celeron server at home for about a year flawlessly. The server is behind a linksys router on a Speakeasy DSL connection. The server is used for internal network backups and do a small amount of web/email hosting. Just yesterday afternoon however, when I tried to ssh into the box from the private side of the network, the connection timed out. Several times. Out of curiosity I tried to ftp to the box and that connection timed out as well. Apache was running and the box still served webpages, but it was extremely slow - on the order of minutes to process and return even simple static pages. The only thing that wasn't laggy and seemd to work okay was email and samba. I hooked up a monitor and keyboard to the server and was able to log in. top, ps and lsof commands didn't show anything out of the ordinary with the box and it seemed quiet normal. I tried to establish an ssh session, which worked after a long delay. So all the internet services setup on the box were running, just very slow, to the point where connections would timeout. Eventually, I turned off dns lookup in sshd_config. When I tried a ssh session after doing that, it worked right away. I turned off dns lookup related commands in apache and proftpd and those services responded normally again (no significant lag or connection timeout errors). So from the actions I took, it seems like there is a problem with the various services trying to do dns look ups on users who try to connect to the box somehow. Since the problem started with no apparent involvement on my part (I had neither installed or uninstalled any applications, etc.), should I assume there is a dns server problem with my ISP? The desktops here at home don't have a problem with dns themselves - it just seems to be the FreeBSD server. What else should I be doing to diagnose the problem? Steve Bopple www.digitalbluesky.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 18:51:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3DE616A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 18:51:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sandy@krvarr.bc.ca) Received: from szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca (szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca [142.179.111.232]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AB6843D4C for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 18:51:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sandy@krvarr.bc.ca) Received: from szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca (8.13.1/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k07KGKRw020107; Sat, 7 Jan 2006 12:16:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sandy@szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca) Received: (from sandy@localhost) by szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca (8.13.1/8.12.11/Submit) id k07KGHwp020104; Sat, 7 Jan 2006 12:16:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sandy) From: Sandy Rutherford MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17344.8362.264379.177151@szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca> Date: Sat, 7 Jan 2006 12:12:26 -0800 To: Matthew Seaman In-Reply-To: <43B26213.5060504@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <200512280736.jBS7aLRH079056@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk> <43B26213.5060504@infracaninophile.co.uk> X-Mailer: VM 7.19 under Emacs 21.3.1 X-krvarr.bc.ca-MailScanner-Information: Please contact postmaster@krvarr.bc.ca for more information. X-krvarr.bc.ca-MailScanner: Not scanned: please contact postmaster@krvarr.bc.ca for details. X-krvarr.bc.ca-MailScanner-From: sandy@szamoca.krvarr.bc.ca Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Imran Imtiaz Subject: Re: ftp nologin problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 18:51:52 -0000 >>>>> On Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:59:47 +0000, >>>>> Matthew Seaman said: > Imran Imtiaz wrote: >> I am running ProFTPD 1.2.10 on my bsd server but the problem is that if a user don't have a shell and I've defined his shell as nologin then the ftp server does not logon and give the following error >> C:\Documents and Settings\Asif>ftp 192.168.0.3 >> Connected to 192.168.0.3. >> 220 ProFTPD 1.2.10 Server (ProFTPD Default Installation) [192.168.0.3] >> User (192.168.0.3:(none)): db.backup >> 331 Password required for db.backup. >> Password: >> 530 Login incorrect. >> Login failed. ftp> >> >> tell me how can I correct this problem cause I don't want to give user a shell. > Yes -- in order for a user to log in successfully via FTP they need: > ... > If you're trying to setup a highly secure mechanism for copying files over > the net for backup, then I'd counsel against using FTP at all -- it's one of > those archaic 'dawn of the internet' type protocols that does nasty things > like transmitting passwords over networks in plain text. Two much better > alternatives are: FTP is actually a very well designed protocol. Jon Postel was no idiot. It is highly reliable and the RFC 959 return codes make it ideal for unattended file transfers. You are right about its security problems. However, ProFTPD, the server that he is using, supports SSL/TLS, which does not transmit passwords in clear text. To talk to ProFTPD using SSL/TLS, you will need to use OpenBSD's ftp-tls client, which is in the ports. Sandy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 18:57:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F284F16A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 18:57:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from moxiefreak@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7675643D45 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 18:57:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from moxiefreak@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 69so3044525wra for ; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 10:57:42 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=FlBPB1QaFEqs2Up0uW11pCrEbw8YdabzAhHGlZgr+ouVqmVZwd4KHj+j0ys4IdGyJu2OmcVKGSXaxqd6eNVT4XJwLvd6PfOB6dQpxgm8qCd2qyjCrgoNVgtvQ7Upn6ORvP3KI6bTsKy4Tc7s6SOhXkHDvr8Kq8hZDQ+XHC6zKSk= Received: by 10.64.148.14 with SMTP id v14mr2321809qbd; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 10:57:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.113.5 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 10:57:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6061fc420601081057u4c1c34f1w548e57dfe4408abb@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 13:57:42 -0500 From: Steve Bernacki To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Userland PPP MSS miscalculation? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 18:57:44 -0000 I think that I've stumbled upon a miscalculation that userland-PPP makes when "mssfixup" is enabled and I wanted to run it by a larger audience before I submitted a problem report. By default, FreeBSD calculates the TCP MSS value of a new TCP connection by taking the MTU of the egress interface and subtracting 40 -- 20 for ip headers, and 20 for tcp headers. Thus, A TCP SYN packet exiting an interface with an MTU of 1500 will have an MSS of 1460. Well behaved TCP implementations seem to know that MSS is a value that does NOT include any TCP options; the number of bytes that TCP options consume are effectively subtracted from the agreed-upon MSS value. So, for a "full" packet (1500mtu/1460mss) with 12 bytes of TCP options, the maximum data payload size is 1448. 1448 (payload) + 12 (TCP options) + 20 (TCP headers) + 20 (I= P headers) =3D 1500. In userland-PPP, the MSS value of an outgoing TCP SYN packet is calculated as such: tcpmss.c: line 73: [tcpmss.c,v 1.7.2.1] #define MAXMSS(mtu) ((mtu) - sizeof(struct ip) - sizeof(struct tcphdr) - 12= ) A change was made on 6/29/2004 to tcpmss.c to subtract 12 from the MAXMSS calculation (See < http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/usr.sbin/ppp/tcpmss.c.diff?r1=3D1= .6&r2=3D1.7&f=3Dh>. According to the PR report that caused the change (bin/32717), this was don= e to pad additional space for TCP options that might be present. The author, Koji Mori, presents a test case that involves connecting to www.netbsd.org, but I suspect that the bug was actually in NetBSD's MSS calculation, although I've not done any research to see if this is the case. By removing the -12 from the MAXMSS calculation and recompiling ppp, outgoing SYN packets on my PPPoE-connected system now have an MSS value of 1452, which works perfectly well. With the -12 included, the MSS is calculated as 1440. This works perfectly well of course, but it wastes 12 extra bytes that could be included in a packet's payload. Am I missing something here, or is my evaluation correct? If it is correct= , I'll go ahead and submit a PR to revert the "-12" change. Thanks, Steve From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 19:29:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31E5216A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 19:29:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from luke.bakken@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A037143D45 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 19:29:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from luke.bakken@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i21so3176500wra for ; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 11:29:22 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=A8H68p66d5k1XsjDFQdPIhxWoxu1bwtsUgTELX2GZnl/3KxB+MBV7+23GVVcuLfsfoxGyOhNur+7wjryMwK+R4uetGE3/xVIKRz2pdNS9U2vcrJ/eGlX1A1/PMPqh01kyEbsr7oQSaUu+ZTGJS2xcSvbQGoeYfoJy8NUMVeRZYI= Received: by 10.65.197.10 with SMTP id z10mr2326495qbp; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 11:29:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.153.11 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 11:29:21 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6acc6ca40601081129i2561edccnec0b5ba95d2815a3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 11:29:21 -0800 From: Luke Bakken To: Kiffin Gish In-Reply-To: <1136741853.1767.0.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <1136735029.820.2.camel@localhost> <20060108170433.GA35310@beryl.lonsteins.com> <20060108172658.GB5646@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> <1136741853.1767.0.camel@localhost> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which is the best open source C/C++ IDE out there? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 19:29:23 -0000 > > > *cough* xemacs *cough* > > > > Great OS, but he wanted an editor. ;-) > > > > > Flame away :) > > > > Hey, you asked for it. :) > > > > Mike > > Yes please: an editor plus integrated compile/build and debugger. vim, emacs + make + gcc is all you need. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 19:45:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A853016A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 19:45:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from apixkernel@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE4EA43D45 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 19:45:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from apixkernel@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id c29so1495284nfb for ; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 11:45:24 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=sO4Ox4dZwte7g8bQtHAvGqiC/P8KDof8zynmY52VyR+JY933Co+/uYMe6NFwotnc9tCpcGERHCFo6dfMXddQm/a6kv9KY2vADH7zAAMXQFZmUv9QJhdc+FiNJCcwM1W30R9ODqzAh+w3PA2zQMLi0WTDledvZG4ODS0xLw4FbaA= Received: by 10.49.5.11 with SMTP id h11mr860470nfi; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 11:45:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.217.5 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 11:45:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8db45f8c0601081145j190d46a4le576079b3e9c9539@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 21:45:24 +0200 From: apix Sender: apixkernel@gmail.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Problem installing gmake X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 19:45:59 -0000 Hello. While installing qmake ( dependancy for gcc-3.4 ) the make exited with an error while compiling the file glob.c in the make /usr/ports/devel/gmake/work/make-3.80/glob derectory. The output form the make, including the error is: if cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I.. -I/usr/local/include -O2 -pipe -finline-functions -fmove-all-movables -frename-registers -fomit-frame-pointer -W -Wall -ansi -pedantic -Wbad-function-cast -Wcast-align -Wcast-qual -Wchar-subscripts -Winline=20 -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Wpointer-arith=20 -Wredundant-decls -Wshadow -Wstrict-prototypes -Wwrite-strings -march=3Dpentium4 -MT glob.o -MD -MP -MF ".deps/glob.Tpo" -c -o glob.o `test -f 'glob.c' || echo './'`glob.c; then mv ".deps/glob.Tpo" ".deps/glob.Po"; else rm -f ".deps/glob.Tpo"; exit 1; fi glob.c:195: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype glob.c:287: warning: redundant redeclaration of 'getlogin' /usr/include/unistd.h:342: warning: previous declaration of 'getlogin' was = here glob.c:294: error: syntax error before "const" glob.c:315: error: syntax error before "const" glob.c: In function `glob': glob.c:395: warning: ISO C90 forbids variable-size array `onealt' glob.c:500: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned glob.c:853: warning: implicit declaration of function `__glob_pattern_p' glob.c:853: warning: nested extern declaration of `__glob_pattern_p' glob.c:871: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned glob.c:922: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned glob.c:949: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned glob.c:1011: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned glob.c:1029: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned glob.c:1052: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned glob.c: In function `globfree': glob.c:1072: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned glob.c: At top level: glob.c:1173: warning: function declaration isn't a prototype glob.c: In function `glob_in_dir': glob.c:1412: warning: declaration of 'save' shadows a previous local glob.c:1231: warning: shadowed declaration is here *** Error code 1 I have updated my port tree with the latest snapshot. Any ideas ??? -- Ack and you shall receive. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 20:00:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82B2916A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 20:00:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-3-1-cust208.cdif.cable.ntl.com [82.31.78.208]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A17B43D45 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 20:00:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from ceri by shrike.submonkey.net with local (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Evghx-000Bbh-9o; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 20:00:05 +0000 Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 20:00:05 +0000 From: Ceri Davies To: RJ Message-ID: <20060108200005.GD97223@submonkey.net> Mail-Followup-To: Ceri Davies , RJ , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <001201c61476$3c038d40$6401a8c0@moreprivate> <0E48B181-7B8D-4935-9FFE-7878F0BDF7CE@submonkey.net> <005f01c6147e$e5a88820$6401a8c0@moreprivate> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qrgsu6vtpU/OV/zm" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <005f01c6147e$e5a88820$6401a8c0@moreprivate> X-PGP: finger ceri@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: Ceri Davies Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: premission denied executing a script X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 20:00:10 -0000 --Qrgsu6vtpU/OV/zm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 01:11:07PM -0500, RJ wrote: > Thanks Ceri but, it didn't solve my problem. > The script starts with "#!/usr/src/bin/sh" and I've tried changing it to > "#!/bin/sh" (no quotes). The end result is still permission denied. >=20 > Does the system log what the script is trying to do? I can't find anythi= ng > so far. No. What does "ls -l /bin/sh /the/script" say? Ceri --=20 Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. -- Einstein (attrib.) --Qrgsu6vtpU/OV/zm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDwW9EocfcwTS3JF8RAv2aAKCu6CLExzlwhiNj8BrgNZNwc/FTLACbB//q h7H8o0Xsdz1PdbHc+SePURE= =WgNi -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Qrgsu6vtpU/OV/zm-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 20:14:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1D9216A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 20:14:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33305.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33305.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 46B2643D46 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 20:14:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 12327 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Jan 2006 20:14:19 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Dq3kazdzp+nSSCARLnVBkHt1Ih3odAma4ku3o7S8DYgxS1rr3oLL43S8S74QQLbUtGDJBlW+OxBKukXSfTQPnVIijkIykkBy0ZLSKdyniUVoT5CEHyPCMONJ34a9fAiJHsiC3+sRO5wfnv0u5WfOQN5q/MCN8BmLwzCKDL6wJow= ; Message-ID: <20060108201419.12325.qmail@web33305.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33305.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 12:14:19 PST Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 12:14:19 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: Wojciech Puchar , Michael Bernstein In-Reply-To: <20060108155751.H22903@chylonia.3miasto.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: jasonharback , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Robert Slade Subject: Re: Sparc vs i386 architecture X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 20:14:21 -0000 --- Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > Hi group, I was just wondering if there's an > advantage to running FreeBSD on > > a SPARC than compared with a regular PC. > Obviously the architecture is > > different (CISC vs RISC). How ever you can > purchase a higher powered PC box > > for less money than it would cost for a > SPARC. > > > user Opteron/Athlon64 - better than both :) > > AMD made RISC-like architecture that just runs > i386-like code (i386+more > registers and few extra instructions, while > lots of mostly-unused > instructions emulated). Thats hilarious, a "reduced instruction set" processor that has extra instructions! Good one! DT __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 20:18:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CED8B16A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 20:18:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33304.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33304.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.119]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B0AB643D76 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 20:18:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 92453 invoked by uid 60001); 8 Jan 2006 20:18:40 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=f32reaek+LnxEz2wSnjoqBtZ9Iv2Su0iIJtaO/RqGdAwz0ZonrObbIQiGMww2ZYFaM0asmNzqtPRfpSyfF5/oqRDhnux+sA1bECb6sKZRTcYPcP5eAifuVEv/m8lY12N80WRBRt8m9ZUo+C+OWt2EJ31VWR78INDIaDPqtCAKoM= ; Message-ID: <20060108201839.92451.qmail@web33304.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33304.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 12:18:39 PST Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 12:18:39 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: Kiffin Gish , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1136735029.820.2.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: Which is the best open source C/C++ IDE out there? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 20:18:52 -0000 --- Kiffin Gish wrote: > I've played around with Anjuta and Code::Blocks > and was wondering what > is the preferred open source C/C++ IDE > available for advanced users. > > Pros and cons etc. would be greatly > appreciated. > This is obviously a trick question, because real programmers don't use IDEs. Case Closed. __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 20:20:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF41816A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 20:20:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Hostmaster@Video2Video.Com) Received: from rocket.alienwebshop.com (rocket.alienwebshop.com [216.120.226.160]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 811DA43D55 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 20:19:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Hostmaster@Video2Video.Com) Received: by rocket.alienwebshop.com (Postfix, from userid 1037) id D0CDA2526E; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 15:19:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rocket.alienwebshop.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF1A12526D; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 15:19:56 -0500 (EST) Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 15:19:56 -0500 (EST) From: Peter Leftwich X-X-Sender: pete@rocket.alienwebshop.com To: Ted Mittelstaedt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20060108150831.H19665@rocket.alienwebshop.com> References: Organization: Video2Video Services - http://Www.Video2Video.Com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Robert Slade Subject: RE: /dev/eth0 question [FC4] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 20:20:02 -0000 On Sat, 7 Jan 2006, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > He probably thinks the competence level on this list is higher. Kind of > makes you wonder why he's running their OS. ;-) > Ted Bingo! *grins* I would really truly rather be running FreeBSD right now, but the SUPER extra EASY GUI installer for FC4 was just SO MUCH SIMPLER and inviting, and if I may venture to say... even easier than any M$FT one. {Doesn't get why Linux doesn't use ufs, instead of ext2 and ext3 for FS's!} -- Peter Leftwich, Owner Video2Video Services Box 13692, La Jolla, CA, 92039, USA http://Www.Video2Video.Com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 21:04:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 282ED16A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 21:04:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout5.cac.washington.edu (mxout5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8264043D49 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 21:04:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout5.cac.washington.edu (8.13.5+UW05.10/8.13.5+UW05.09) with ESMTP id k08L4UNk025253 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 13:04:34 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [128.208.4.17] (shiina.dyn.cs.washington.edu [128.208.4.17]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.5+UW05.10/8.13.5+UW05.09) with ESMTP id k08L4UXT006405 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 13:04:30 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) In-Reply-To: <2061F3AE-A704-4058-8C93-648D22919FEE@u.washington.edu> References: <2061F3AE-A704-4058-8C93-648D22919FEE@u.washington.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Garrett Cooper Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 13:05:19 -0800 To: FreeBSD Questions X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' Subject: Re: System segfaulting / panicking a lot after kernel upgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 21:04:38 -0000 Figured out what it was. It was just a stick of RAM that went south. -Garrett On Jan 7, 2006, at 11:19 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > Hello again, > I've reinstalled FreeBSD 6.0 on my celeron box recently, and after > a kernel upgrade my system seems to be segfaulting a lot during > compilations and has panicked quite a few times. First thing that > pops into my mind is bad RAM, but I also changed the CPU arch to > pentium3 (which I thought was valid for my Tualatin 1.2 GHz > Celeron), and upped the optimization level to -O2. Could that > possibly have anything to do with the issues I am seeing? I also > added quite a few modules to WITHOUT_MODULES, which I didn't think > would cause a problem, but I'm not a pro at maneuvering around the > FreeBSD kernel yet... > Thanks in advance, > -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 21:30:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2117816A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 21:30:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from npacemo@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D88243D45 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 21:30:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from npacemo@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 8so3852937nzo for ; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 13:30:16 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=uMw4Nh/hkeBtlP4noksuFjpNji04/zckSkGPtsjNlQnFWbkDBHk+GAC7vWyi0EpB589NsYIuJaObsKAzX/pWmAg2J3AQWefGWX86Hb+XoEkhyzvS34KR+gF5bn7pgWrob7r1hf9E1ZuISY+u5Jzm6OEkdwd01JJ+N2rep5RKXw8= Received: by 10.36.146.15 with SMTP id t15mr11987916nzd; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 13:30:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.250.38 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 13:30:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <666bdb140601081330m3b394a02v@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 23:30:07 +0200 From: Vladimir Tsvetkov To: danial_thom@yahoo.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060108201839.92451.qmail@web33304.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <1136735029.820.2.camel@localhost> <20060108201839.92451.qmail@web33304.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Cc: Subject: Re: Which is the best open source C/C++ IDE out there? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 21:30:17 -0000 > This is obviously a trick question, because real > programmers don't use IDEs. Case Closed. I'm not a real programmer, but UNIX is a great developer environment. It's a tool based environment. Small tools, strong cohesion in what they are designed for, easy ways to combine them to form more complex tasks. Good documentation too. Actually you don't need anything else, you don't need a colourfull IDE. But= ... Maybe only few, really exceptional people can benefit and grok the power of this kind of environments. To me the ideal "IDE" is actually a toolkit: - Source Editor, preferably with a object browser or other kind of a source browser. An autocomplete functionallity could increase productivity too - this could increase quality if we measure quality of code by the low number of syntax mistakes, but this could also be a threat to quality letting the programmer write without reading carefully what is written - code bloating. - Compiler with a debugger. We must discuss about the pros. and cons. of a grafic debugger versus a text-mode debugger. The things are getting really messy when it comes up to debugging multithreading code and I really don't know what is the ultimate tool for this task. - A build tool. Ant or make will suffice. - Source control tools. CVS, SVN etc. - Documentation tools. POD, Doxygen, Javadoc or something else. - Unit testing framework. This is not always a tool. This could be a language extension, or a testing API. - Other tools. You don't need to put everything together in a single swissknife-tool, but this could be convenient in some cases. IDE vs. Toolbased Environments ??? Which is more productive and how to measure productiveness? Best Regards, Vladimir Tsvetkov From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 22:03:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C74016A420 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 22:03:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from ms-smtp-03-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (ms-smtp-03-smtplb.ohiordc.rr.com [65.24.5.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABBAC43D46 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 22:03:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from satellite (cpe-65-31-43-91.woh.res.rr.com [65.31.43.91]) by ms-smtp-03-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id k08M31YF010712 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:03:01 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <000701c6149e$1e961b60$0900a8c0@satellite> From: "Dave" To: Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 16:54:37 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: adding virtual webmail users, freebsd6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dave List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 22:03:05 -0000 Hello, I'm setting up a webmail solution on freebsd6. So far i've got the underlying MTA Postfix working. I've installed Squirrelmail from ports so far all of this installed fine. Now i want to give another user an administrative function, adding virtual users, so that i won't have to manually add real users whenever a new account is needed. Is this doable? Thanks. Dave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 22:44:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD8CD16A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 22:44:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E2BAC43D49 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 22:44:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Jan 2006 22:44:32 -0000 Received: from 113.255.203.62.cust.bluewin.ch (EHLO storage.mine.nu) [62.203.255.113] by mail.gmx.net (mp033) with SMTP; 08 Jan 2006 23:44:32 +0100 X-Authenticated: #912863 Received: from storage.mine.nu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by storage.mine.nu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k08MhOPH060689; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 23:43:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lars@storage.mine.nu) Received: (from lars@localhost) by storage.mine.nu (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k08MhNFc060688; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 23:43:23 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lars) Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 23:43:22 +0100 From: lars To: Chuck Swiger Message-ID: <20060108224322.GA60673@storage.mine.nu> References: <20060108023655.H1088@ganymede.hub.org> <43C13919.5070900@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43C13919.5070900@mac.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Server vendor specific mailing lists ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 22:44:34 -0000 Chuck Swiger wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > >Not sure who best to send this to, but figured I'd send it publicly to > >see also if others think this idea might have merit ... > > > >Basically, I'm just about to take possession of my first HP server ... > >my biggest 'fear' is that HP doesn't support FreeBSD, but from posts > >I've seen here, that shouldn't be a problem ... what I'd love to see is > >a 'vendor specific' mailing list where ppl can more easily tap others > >brains for their experiences ... a "FreeBSD user support group for > >{IBM,HP,Dell} servers", that a FreeBSD user can turn to knowing that > >others on that list are using "their vendor of choice" for their servers > >... > > FreeBSD attempts to support all reasonably functional hardware; there isn't > a great deal of difference between a Dell and an HP except for which RAID > system and NIC they come with. > > You might find that mentioning the specific model you have would produce > more useful feedback. You might also find asking the freebsd-isp list > would produce responses more oriented towards people rackrounting and using > LOM/remote management tools... And then there's also the FreeBSD ProLiant mailing list: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-proliant From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 00:40:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AB3D16A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 00:40:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from mail.storm.ca (mail.storm.ca [209.87.239.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B806443D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 00:40:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msoulier@digitaltorque.ca) Received: from tigger.digitaltorque.ca (ppp-216-106-108-228.storm.ca [216.106.108.228]) by mail.storm.ca (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k090ePJ9024740 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 19:40:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from tigger.digitaltorque.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by tigger.digitaltorque.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 400A923DC5 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 19:40:20 -0500 (EST) Received: (from msoulier@localhost) by tigger.digitaltorque.ca (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id k090eJfX022282 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 19:40:19 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: tigger.digitaltorque.ca: msoulier set sender to msoulier@digitaltorque.ca using -f Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 19:40:19 -0500 From: "Michael P. Soulier" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060109004019.GD5646@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <1136735029.820.2.camel@localhost> <20060108201839.92451.qmail@web33304.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <666bdb140601081330m3b394a02v@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9dgjiU4MmWPVapMU" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <666bdb140601081330m3b394a02v@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: Which is the best open source C/C++ IDE out there? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:40:27 -0000 --9dgjiU4MmWPVapMU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 08/01/06 Vladimir Tsvetkov said: > To me the ideal "IDE" is actually a toolkit: I believe Unix's original name was PTB, the Programmer's ToolBox. Hence why Unix usually _is_ my IDE. Mike --=20 Michael P. Soulier "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein --9dgjiU4MmWPVapMU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDwbDzKGqCc1vIvggRAms0AJoDclv3KFo1+QsvcEQDf2UuWrmeYgCgjMge d2nAulMZyeGnaU0Dr8PW5d4= =XFW1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9dgjiU4MmWPVapMU-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 01:20:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11C9216A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 01:20:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout5.cac.washington.edu (mxout5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 915DF43D46 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 01:20:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9]) by mxout5.cac.washington.edu (8.13.5+UW05.10/8.13.5+UW05.09) with ESMTP id k091KNOZ022929 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:20:26 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.23] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.5+UW05.10/8.13.5+UW05.09) with ESMTP id k091KMAq012121 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:20:22 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) To: FreeBSD Questions Message-Id: <4053413D-A3D3-4553-A1C9-49E92CD1D1F9@u.washington.edu> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=Apple-Mail-1--451317498 From: Garrett Cooper Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 17:21:12 -0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' Subject: Extremely slow authentication via SSH on FreeBSD 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 01:20:30 -0000 --Apple-Mail-1--451317498 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed I'm having a hard time authenticating after upgrading the kernel and some packages, and I was wondering if someone could help me out with this issue. I marked the trouble points and included my sshd_config. Output: shiina:~ gcooper$ ssh -v hoover OpenSSH_3.8.1p1, OpenSSL 0.9.7i 14 Oct 2005 debug1: Reading configuration data /etc/ssh_config debug1: Connecting to hoover [192.168.0.22] port 22. debug1: Connection established. debug1: identity file /Users/gcooper/.ssh/identity type -1 debug1: identity file /Users/gcooper/.ssh/id_rsa type -1 debug1: identity file /Users/gcooper/.ssh/id_dsa type -1 debug1: Remote protocol version 2.0, remote software version OpenSSH_4.2p1 FreeBSD-20050903 debug1: match: OpenSSH_4.2p1 FreeBSD-20050903 pat OpenSSH* debug1: Enabling compatibility mode for protocol 2.0 debug1: Local version string SSH-2.0-OpenSSH_3.8.1p1 debug1: An invalid name was supplied Configuration file does not specify default realm debug1: An invalid name was supplied A parameter was malformed Validation error debug1: An invalid name was supplied Configuration file does not specify default realm debug1: An invalid name was supplied A parameter was malformed Validation error debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT received debug1: kex: server->client aes128-cbc hmac-md5 none debug1: kex: client->server aes128-cbc hmac-md5 none debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REQUEST(1024<1024<8192) sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_GROUP debug1: SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_INIT sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_KEX_DH_GEX_REPLY debug1: Host 'hoover' is known and matches the DSA host key. debug1: Found key in /Users/gcooper/.ssh/known_hosts:29 debug1: ssh_dss_verify: signature correct debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS sent debug1: expecting SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS debug1: SSH2_MSG_NEWKEYS received debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_REQUEST sent debug1: SSH2_MSG_SERVICE_ACCEPT received #ssh hangs here for about 30 seconds. debug1: Authentications that can continue: password debug1: Next authentication method: password gcooper@hoover's password: Thanks! -Garrett --Apple-Mail-1--451317498 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: application/octet-stream; x-unix-mode=0644; name="sshd_config" Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=sshd_config #VersionAddendum FreeBSD-20050903 #Port 22 #Protocol 2 #AddressFamily any #ListenAddress 0.0.0.0 #ListenAddress :: # HostKey for protocol version 1 #HostKey /etc/ssh/ssh_host_key # HostKeys for protocol version 2 #HostKey /etc/ssh/ssh_host_dsa_key # Lifetime and size of ephemeral version 1 server key #KeyRegenerationInterval 1h ServerKeyBits 1024 # Logging # obsoletes QuietMode and FascistLogging #SyslogFacility AUTH #LogLevel INFO # Authentication: #LoginGraceTime 2m PermitRootLogin no #StrictModes yes #MaxAuthTries 6 #RSAAuthentication yes PubkeyAuthentication no #AuthorizedKeysFile .ssh/authorized_keys # For this to work you will also need host keys in /etc/ssh/ssh_known_hosts #RhostsRSAAuthentication no # similar for protocol version 2 #HostbasedAuthentication no # Change to yes if you don't trust ~/.ssh/known_hosts for # RhostsRSAAuthentication and HostbasedAuthentication #IgnoreUserKnownHosts no # Don't read the user's ~/.rhosts and ~/.shosts files #IgnoreRhosts yes # Change to yes to enable built-in password authentication. PasswordAuthentication yes PermitEmptyPasswords no # Change to no to disable PAM authentication ChallengeResponseAuthentication no # Kerberos options #KerberosAuthentication no #KerberosOrLocalPasswd yes #KerberosTicketCleanup yes #KerberosGetAFSToken no # GSSAPI options #GSSAPIAuthentication no #GSSAPICleanupCredentials yes # Set this to 'no' to disable PAM authentication, account processing, # and session processing. If this is enabled, PAM authentication will # be allowed through the ChallengeResponseAuthentication mechanism. # Depending on your PAM configuration, this may bypass the setting of # PasswordAuthentication, PermitEmptyPasswords, and # "PermitRootLogin without-password". If you just want the PAM account and # session checks to run without PAM authentication, then enable this but set # ChallengeResponseAuthentication=no UsePAM yes AllowTcpForwarding yes #GatewayPorts no #X11Forwarding yes #X11DisplayOffset 10 #X11UseLocalhost yes #PrintMotd yes #PrintLastLog yes #TCPKeepAlive yes #UseLogin no UsePrivilegeSeparation yes PermitUserEnvironment no #Compression delayed #ClientAliveInterval 0 #ClientAliveCountMax 3 #UseDNS yes #PidFile /var/run/sshd.pid #MaxStartups 10 # no default banner path #Banner /some/path # override default of no subsystems Subsystem sftp /usr/libexec/sftp-server --Apple-Mail-1--451317498-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 01:25:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56E5C16A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 01:25:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCDD043D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 01:25:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Evlmp-0000CO-LG for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:25:29 +0100 Received: from c-24-147-87-49.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([24.147.87.49]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:25:27 +0100 Received: from jdarnold by c-24-147-87-49.hsd1.ma.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:25:27 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: JD Arnold Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 20:25:35 -0500 Organization: Amazing Developments Lines: 42 Message-ID: References: <43BD511F.7010403@charter.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-24-147-87-49.hsd1.ma.comcast.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) In-Reply-To: <43BD511F.7010403@charter.net> Sender: news Subject: Re: how do you install wx-config in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 01:25:37 -0000 bob self wrote: > I'm running FreeBSD 6.0 and have installed > wxgtk2-2.6.2_1 and wxgtk2-common-2.6.2. > > VLC runs fine so I know that wxwidges is installed correctly. But I want > to install the wxsamples > and compile them. I copied wxsamples manually and try to compile using a > script from an older > freebsd system but it wants wx-config and I can't find out how to get > that installed using the > ports. Which port would include that? wx-config is in the wxWidgets port, only it is named using the version of wxgtk: /usr/X11R6/bin/wxgtk2-2.6-config I guess maybe they don't want to overwrite any existing wx-config, but I suppose it would be nice if the port installer checked for it, and if it didn't exist, create it using a link. You should do that (as root): # cd /usr/X11R6/bin # ln wx-gtk2-2.6-config wx-config You can find out whether it got intalled by the wxgtk port by using pkg_info: # pkg_info -xL wxgtk | grep bin would should show where the -config and the wxrc got installed. BTW, I talk about the pkg_info option in a recent post on my blog. Thanks to Dru from OnLamp.com for showing me this very cool option, something I've always wondered about, as sometimes it can be very mysterious as to what and where a port might install stuff. -- Jonathan Arnold (mailto:jdarnold@buddydog.org) Daemon Dancing in the Dark, a FreeBSD weblog: http://freebsd.amazingdev.com/blog/ UNIX is user-friendly. It's just a bit picky about who its friends are. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 02:20:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28AA916A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 02:20:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thiago_est@yahoo.com.br) Received: from web30010.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web30010.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.200.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A18A43D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 02:20:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thiago_est@yahoo.com.br) Received: (qmail 4259 invoked by uid 60001); 9 Jan 2006 02:19:57 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.br; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=1Ba70+kYYWUJt0O4R2nQlxMQ8EFYB4reXBLZkS8bdpj27HewRyidkKeQ7onEGpV/U29YoU9kHA+UZH0jF61GpkjmcgwItQWV52ud//4SKDsq3PQsfaQW7jy45ocl9bBWerv7AnTdR9ICjEo8HcYNjTaTQHknZTO9M9tn/quyvM8= ; Message-ID: <20060109021957.4257.qmail@web30010.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [200.191.172.21] by web30010.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 23:19:57 ART Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 23:19:57 -0300 (ART) From: Thiago Esteves To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: 5.4, /etc/default/make.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:20:04 -0000 Hi, I' from Brazil. Why isn't there /etc/default/make.conf on FreeBSD 5.4 ? Thanks....Thiago --------------------------------- Yahoo! doce lar. Faça do Yahoo! sua homepage. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 02:30:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB78416A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 02:30:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rmarella@gmail.com) Received: from ms-smtp-01-eri0.socal.rr.com (ms-smtp-01-qfe0.socal.rr.com [66.75.162.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 650CE43D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 02:30:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rmarella@gmail.com) Received: from frankie.konav201.local (cpe-66-8-187-40.hawaii.res.rr.com [66.8.187.40]) by ms-smtp-01-eri0.socal.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id k092Ul7t007653 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 18:30:48 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 16:30:46 -1000 From: Robert Marella To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Message-ID: <20060108163046.5c625ab5@frankie.konav201.local> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.100 (GTK+ 2.8.9; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: portmanager core dumps X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 02:30:50 -0000 Good Afternoon At times when in a hurry or not thinking as fast as my fingers, I try to run "portupgrade -s | grep OLD" from a regular user account instead of "sudo portupgrade -s | grep OLD". I would expect portupgrade to insult my intelligence and question my heritage .... or is that question my intelligence and insult my heritage. Well, it doesn't do either. It core dumps. This will happen on more than one system running 6 Stable and the updated portmanager. [robert@frankie] ~> pkg_info | grep portmanager portmanager-0.4.1_4 FreeBSD installed ports status and safe update utility Thanks Robert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 04:15:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4060C16A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 04:15:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7F3143D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 04:15:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C430162C852; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 00:15:25 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 63837-08; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 00:15:25 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-222-82-85.eastlink.ca [24.222.82.85]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CE4962C84D; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 00:15:25 -0400 (AST) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A5FA346140; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 00:15:23 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A50F645DA8; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 00:15:23 -0400 (AST) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 00:15:23 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: lars In-Reply-To: <20060108224322.GA60673@storage.mine.nu> Message-ID: <20060109001509.A1088@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20060108023655.H1088@ganymede.hub.org> <43C13919.5070900@mac.com> <20060108224322.GA60673@storage.mine.nu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Server vendor specific mailing lists ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 04:15:27 -0000 On Sun, 8 Jan 2006, lars wrote: > Chuck Swiger wrote: >> Marc G. Fournier wrote: >>> Not sure who best to send this to, but figured I'd send it publicly to >>> see also if others think this idea might have merit ... >>> >>> Basically, I'm just about to take possession of my first HP server ... >>> my biggest 'fear' is that HP doesn't support FreeBSD, but from posts >>> I've seen here, that shouldn't be a problem ... what I'd love to see is >>> a 'vendor specific' mailing list where ppl can more easily tap others >>> brains for their experiences ... a "FreeBSD user support group for >>> {IBM,HP,Dell} servers", that a FreeBSD user can turn to knowing that >>> others on that list are using "their vendor of choice" for their servers >>> ... >> >> FreeBSD attempts to support all reasonably functional hardware; there isn't >> a great deal of difference between a Dell and an HP except for which RAID >> system and NIC they come with. >> >> You might find that mentioning the specific model you have would produce >> more useful feedback. You might also find asking the freebsd-isp list >> would produce responses more oriented towards people rackrounting and using >> LOM/remote management tools... > And then there's also the FreeBSD ProLiant mailing list: > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-proliant Very quiet list, but exactly what I'm looking for ... thanks ;) ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 04:57:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F116E16A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 04:57:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phrac@disflux.com) Received: from mail.disflux.com (tconl90110.tconl.com [204.26.90.110]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A08B143D49 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 04:57:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phrac@disflux.com) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (unknown [192.168.1.100]) by mail.disflux.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67CC71701B; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 22:57:59 -0600 (CST) In-Reply-To: <000701c6149e$1e961b60$0900a8c0@satellite> References: <000701c6149e$1e961b60$0900a8c0@satellite> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) X-Priority: 3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Derek Musselmann Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 22:57:48 -0600 To: Dave X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: adding virtual webmail users, freebsd6 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 04:57:51 -0000 Yes, it is doable with postfix and it's not too complicated. You'll basically need a database for the backend (mysql, postgresql) and a few config changes to postfix. There are several tutorials available on the postfix website: http://www.postfix.org/docs.html ----- Derek Musselmann http://www.disflux.com On Jan 8, 2006, at 3:54 PM, Dave wrote: > Hello, > I'm setting up a webmail solution on freebsd6. So far i've got > the underlying MTA Postfix working. I've installed Squirrelmail > from ports so far all of this installed fine. Now i want to give > another user an administrative function, adding virtual users, so > that i won't have to manually add real users whenever a new account > is needed. Is this doable? > Thanks. > Dave. > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 05:10:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B4DE16A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 05:10:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phrac@disflux.com) Received: from mail.disflux.com (tconl90110.tconl.com [204.26.90.110]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2529B43D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 05:10:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from phrac@disflux.com) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (unknown [192.168.1.100]) by mail.disflux.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDB611701B; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 23:10:23 -0600 (CST) In-Reply-To: <4053413D-A3D3-4553-A1C9-49E92CD1D1F9@u.washington.edu> References: <4053413D-A3D3-4553-A1C9-49E92CD1D1F9@u.washington.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <8C520B67-731D-4064-967F-BDD017FE3C28@disflux.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Derek Musselmann Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 23:10:13 -0600 To: Garrett Cooper X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Extremely slow authentication via SSH on FreeBSD 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 05:10:15 -0000 On Jan 8, 2006, at 7:21 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: > I'm having a hard time authenticating after upgrading the kernel > and some packages, and I was wondering if someone could help me out > with this issue. I marked the trouble points and included my > sshd_config. I noticed in your sshd_config that you have: # Change to yes to enable built-in password authentication. PasswordAuthentication yes PermitEmptyPasswords no # Change to no to disable PAM authentication ChallengeResponseAuthentication no By default, ssh uses PAM for authentication. By commenting those lines out, it doesn't mean that password checking won't be done, just that it will be handled with PAM. And then later in the file you have: UsePAM yes Try commenting out the PasswordAuthentication, PermitEmptyPasswords, and ChallengeResponse lines. ----- Derek Musselmann http://www.disflux.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 05:14:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1F6416A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 05:14:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bbobowski@gmail.com) Received: from fep1.cogeco.net (smtp.cogeco.net [216.221.81.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5979943D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 05:14:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bbobowski@gmail.com) Received: from [24.235.177.114] (d235-177-114.home1.cgocable.net [24.235.177.114]) by fep1.cogeco.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5BF3E00A for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 00:14:46 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43C1F14E.3010808@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:14:54 -0500 From: Brian Bobowski User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040626 Thunderbird/0.7.1 Mnenhy/0.6.0.104 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD User Questions List References: <43BC097C.4000401@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <43BC097C.4000401@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Setting up a FreeBSD gateway (more detail) and IPFW X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 05:14:49 -0000 Thanks to those who replied to my previous call for help. Now I think it's time I actually provide some relevant detail. I've got two computers - one is my workstation, one is my server / gateway-to-be. My outside connection is via a hub to a cable modem; currently I have my workstation rigged directly to it with no problems. I'll go over what I've done so far, and hope that if I've made a glaring error someone will be able to point it out. - I have two NICs: ed0 and rl0. ed0 will be connected to my workstation, rl0 to the hub and thence the Internet. - I've configured a custom kernel per the directions in the handbook on NAT - that is, IPFIREWALL and IPDIVERT are in there. - I have the various options set in rc.conf, with natd_interface="rl0". - To set up the NICs, I have ifconfig_ed0="192.168.0.1" and ifconfig_rl0="DHCP". I'll set my workstation to use 192.168.0.2 if I can figure out why it's locking my NIC / IP settings(that's a WinXP issue). - In my named.conf, under forwarders, I set one of my ISP's DNS servers. (Is it possible, and if so, beneficial, to put more than one entry there? My ISP gives me four.) I'm only running a caching DNS, so I otherwise left named.conf alone. - I've run the make-localhost script in /etc/namedb. - I've put named_enable="YES" in rc.conf as well. Ideally, I'd like to be able to leave my workstation's network settings alone, and set up DHCP; however, a look over the ports suggests that's far more trouble than it's worth for a single client that doesn't really need such flexibility. I don't have any servers running on my workstation, so I've no need to allow traffic from the 'net to get through the firewall to the LAN(servers on the gateway itself are another matter). However, the firewall is still my biggest challenge. To get set up and running, since I don't currently know the ports for every single thing I might use(and some things I telnet to are on nonstandard ports anyway) I'm probably going to use the example ruleset #2 for IPFW with NAT, except that until such time as I know a little more detail about what I need to block, I'll be assuming that anything from the workstation is good traffic. That rule, however, is causing me some concern, and I'd like to confirm that it has a good chance of working before I go to the smoke test. Thus, inserting at the appropriate point into the last example given on http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/firewalls-ipfw.html the best I can cobble together is: $cmd allow all from 192.168.0.2 to any out via $pif setup keep-state Will this allow my workstation unhindered access to the Internet without opening it to every single inbound port? I'm a little confused here. I don't think I need anything but Apache (i.e. port 80 TCP) and SSL (22 TCP) inbound; the MySQL server is strictly internal, so the stock ruleset otherwise seems pretty good to me. I can open up secure HTTP if I get that working, based on the rules already there. Please send replies directly to me. Thanks in advance, -BB From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 05:35:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A29D16A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 05:35:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wbs@infowest.com) Received: from tozar.infowest.com (tozar.out.smtp.infowest.com [204.17.177.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14F0E43D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 05:35:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wbs@infowest.com) Received: from alora.infowest.com (alora.client.smtp.infowest.com [204.17.177.61]) by tozar.infowest.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14AB1244D87 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 22:35:17 -0700 (MST) Received: from infowest.com (webmail.infowest.com [204.17.177.50]) by alora.infowest.com (Postfix) with SMTP id ECF081E3021 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 22:35:16 -0700 (MST) Sender: wbs@infowest.com From: wbs@infowest.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Quality Web Email v3.1n, http://netwinsite.com/refw.htm Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 22:35:16 -0700 Message-id: <43c1f614.3a1.447d.1280318817@infowest.com> Subject: Where do I find libm.so.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: wbs@infowest.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 05:35:38 -0000 I am interested in running a+ (from www.aplusdev.org). They have a FreeBSD binary. But when I try to run it I get an error message about being unable to find libm.so.2. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 05:39:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A683C16A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 05:39:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wbs@infowest.com) Received: from guadix.infowest.com (guadix.out.smtp.infowest.com [204.17.177.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64A4E43D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 05:39:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wbs@infowest.com) Received: from alora.infowest.com (alora.client.smtp.infowest.com [204.17.177.61]) by guadix.infowest.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11455165D83 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 22:39:06 -0700 (MST) Received: from infowest.com (webmail.infowest.com [204.17.177.50]) by alora.infowest.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E936B1E3018 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 22:39:05 -0700 (MST) Sender: wbs@infowest.com From: wbs@infowest.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Quality Web Email v3.1n, http://netwinsite.com/refw.htm Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 22:39:05 -0700 Message-id: <43c1f6f9.38e.457f.1542641428@infowest.com> Subject: notebook keyboard configuration under Xorg X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: wbs@infowest.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 05:39:06 -0000 When I type - either in generic X oor Gnome - I sometimes get duplicate letters showing up. I haven't a clue where to turrn. My notebook is a Toshiba Satelite Pro 6100. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 05:41:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 165EF16A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 05:41:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 552F143D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 05:41:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ringworm01@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id l1so3909384nzf for ; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 21:41:24 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=VTXF/G0W0ltujztDwF/LmbTn6IIAD173EogBCZ5g9hT3Emsr4t7qc8oyvw+97R9aagQw+mFDe8zP096UjgWQXKtW8BJGxPYiPBqxJlXMtMG7z+XxAhIFpRAi+hRDHL4AkEv+gCxJ+rINuc61vBB4Se/rKzuTcsKRJgUrdQv4EHE= Received: by 10.36.251.32 with SMTP id y32mr2278039nzh; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 21:41:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from ringworm.mechee.com ( [71.102.36.221]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 34sm3504480nza.2006.01.08.21.41.23; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 21:41:24 -0800 (PST) From: "Michael C. Shultz" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 21:41:19 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <20060108163046.5c625ab5@frankie.konav201.local> In-Reply-To: <20060108163046.5c625ab5@frankie.konav201.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200601082141.20499.ringworm01@gmail.com> Cc: Robert Marella Subject: Re: portmanager core dumps X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 05:41:26 -0000 On Sunday 08 January 2006 18:30, Robert Marella wrote: > Good Afternoon > > At times when in a hurry or not thinking as fast as my fingers, I try > to run "portupgrade -s | grep OLD" from a regular user account instead > of "sudo portupgrade -s | grep OLD". do you mean "portmanager -s | grep OLD" by any chance? > > I would expect portupgrade to insult my intelligence and question my > heritage .... or is that question my intelligence and insult my > heritage. Well, it doesn't do either. It core dumps. This will happen > on more than one system running 6 Stable and the updated portmanager. > > [robert@frankie] ~> pkg_info | grep portmanager > portmanager-0.4.1_4 FreeBSD installed ports status and safe update > utility > > Thanks > > Robert Portmanager will only run as root, I'll make a note/bug to check error handling when someone attempts to run it as a normal user. -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 05:45:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C84616A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 05:45:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B00E43D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 05:45:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (patr530-a120.otenet.gr [212.205.215.120]) by kane.otenet.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-8) with ESMTP id k095jI6V032235; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 07:45:18 +0200 Received: by flame.pc (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 96FE011854; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 07:43:52 +0200 (EET) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 07:43:52 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: wbs@infowest.com Message-ID: <20060109054352.GA1301@flame.pc> References: <43c1f614.3a1.447d.1280318817@infowest.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43c1f614.3a1.447d.1280318817@infowest.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Where do I find libm.so.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 05:45:22 -0000 On 2006-01-08 22:35, wbs@infowest.com wrote: > I am interested in running a+ (from www.aplusdev.org). They > have a FreeBSD binary. But when I try to run it I get an error > message about being unable to find libm.so.2. This is an older version of the libm.so library. You can get a copy of it by installing the misc/compat4x port. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 05:57:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75A6D16A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 05:57:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paulino.calderon@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F08E443D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 05:57:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paulino.calderon@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 71so3074371wra for ; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 21:57:43 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=XjYTDhcY4OR2UuHZL8uqZ7ceNX0I1pbF3Ey9KxUjyK+omytg8cupSOvlyrZjrAl9emLbfobtHJb7i2pGY/dhvkqf4KJk6EtsFF4Jf+C1ZaSSjI3S2lCkLbMmIVoePuhso2HA8uzqqrYhaQWKXfdo0x8A7a46LQd+xE9xfFefTrc= Received: by 10.64.208.18 with SMTP id f18mr2408903qbg; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 21:57:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.10.5 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 21:57:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <8dc358df0601082157m241a2c2ejce7617aefa09352d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 21:57:43 -0800 From: Paulino Calderon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Cannot remove old log files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 05:57:44 -0000 Hello. I am currently moving to a new log administration policy, the problem is that there are some old logs that I would like to delete but I can't, the error is the typical "Operation not permitted" although I am trying to do this as root, the file's permissions are ok and there are no special file flag activated or anything, any ideas? suckea# uname -a FreeBSD suckea.com 5.3-SECURITY FreeBSD 5.3-SECURITY #0: Wed Jul 20 06:22:23 UTC 2005 =20 root@builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 mybox# ls -lo [snip] -rwx------ 1 root wheel - 78 Dec 6 15:00 auth.log.zzpKVF1 -rwx------ 1 root wheel - 78 Jan 3 05:00 auth.log.zzr4dZD -rwx------ 1 root wheel - 78 Jan 4 17:00 auth.log.zzyP5R0 mybox# rm -rf auth.log.* [snip] rm: auth.log.zzr4dZD: Operation not permitted rm: auth.log.zzyP5R0: Operation not permitted mybox# uname -a FreeBSD suckea.com 5.3-SECURITY FreeBSD 5.3-SECURITY #0: Wed Jul 20 06:22:23 UTC 2005 =20 root@builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 Thanks for your time. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 06:01:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBD9216A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 06:01:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from home_post01@yahoo.co.jp) Received: from web3310.mail.bbt.yahoo.co.jp (web3310.mail.bbt.yahoo.co.jp [202.93.90.47]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 49D6143D5E for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 06:01:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from home_post01@yahoo.co.jp) Received: (qmail 9193 invoked by uid 60001); 9 Jan 2006 06:01:26 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=yj20050223; d=yahoo.co.jp; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=ePxpkAXLgxmM1hGwwsQmN2kF7m73Eaj+YztyhmQoje+q+1LzUAQNWPcv2uAs5njKf4N+9473iIw71ahj/C//SOcq4XZhVogX6un/ZvPZGPZzzs/jRWs2LBMUg7gWNn5R ; Message-ID: <20060109060125.9191.qmail@web3310.mail.bbt.yahoo.co.jp> Received: from [220.150.157.80] by web3310.mail.bbt.yahoo.co.jp via HTTP; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 15:01:25 JST Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 15:01:25 +0900 (JST) From: n-n To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp Subject: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 06:01:30 -0000 It is hoped that FreeBSD becomes a system like HP-UX. -------------------------------------- Yahoo! Mail - supported by 10million people http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/mail_pr/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 06:45:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D2BA16A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 06:45:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from ms-smtp-02-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (ms-smtp-02-smtplb.ohiordc.rr.com [65.24.5.136]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0EED43D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 06:45:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dmehler26@woh.rr.com) Received: from satellite (cpe-65-31-43-91.woh.res.rr.com [65.31.43.91]) by ms-smtp-02-eri0.ohiordc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with SMTP id k096jfXV006417 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 01:45:41 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <000e01c614e7$215705f0$0900a8c0@satellite> From: "Dave" To: Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 01:37:14 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: adjkerntz in a jail X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Dave List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 06:45:45 -0000 Hello, I'm running apache in a jail on 6.0. Cron is sending me output like: adjkerntz[33405]: sysctl(put_wallclock): Operation not permitted Is this entry needed in a jail's crontab to run adjkerntz and if so what setting do i have to alter on the host system to make it work? Thanks. Dave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 07:00:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D1F616A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 07:00:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xnooby@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C365E43D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 07:00:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xnooby@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id n28so66516nfc for ; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 23:00:11 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=rWR3RxXJW91/NA9bKUd1iyS7iYJRodUyWK+uhI/cAGEAqqQheJjQFOTAXvh57uuX9L0iLOiPy2KYp0APw1EqVEY6BGSb5WM8MTLlMnD30aMRm3+8scOk2fqKVpLtB8MeZn4V+lPnsRvUvXJLWygBrIifMQ6mQzeun6SykJponuU= Received: by 10.48.246.4 with SMTP id t4mr885114nfh; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 23:00:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.216.4 with HTTP; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 23:00:10 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 02:00:10 -0500 From: Xn Nooby To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Will VMWare 5.5 run on FreeBSD 6.x ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 07:00:13 -0000 I notice VMWare 5.5 worked with Redhat 8, and FreeBSD 6 uses Redhat 8 for its linux emulation. Does the Linux version of VMWare 5.5 work on FreeBSD 6.x ? I saw the VM 5.5 toolbox and some kind of "guest daemon" in the ports tree, but it didn't look like VMWare 5.5 itself was in there. I bought VMWare 5.5 for Linux, and assumed I'd have to run Ubuntu to use it= , but I would prefer FreeBSD. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 07:00:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD51016A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 07:00:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from rosebud.otenet.gr (rosebud.otenet.gr [195.170.0.94]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC46243D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 07:00:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) by rosebud.otenet.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-8) with SMTP id k0970Y3n017440; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 09:00:34 +0200 Received: by flame.pc (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B9FEF1181A; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 08:59:08 +0200 (EET) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 08:59:08 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Paulino Calderon Message-ID: <20060109065908.GA1026@flame.pc> References: <8dc358df0601082157m241a2c2ejce7617aefa09352d@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8dc358df0601082157m241a2c2ejce7617aefa09352d@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cannot remove old log files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 07:00:37 -0000 On 2006-01-08 21:57, Paulino Calderon wrote: > Hello. > I am currently moving to a new log administration policy, the problem > is that there are some old logs that I would like to delete but I > can't, the error is the typical "Operation not permitted" although I > am trying to do this as root, the file's permissions are ok and there > are no special file flag activated or anything, any ideas? > > suckea# uname -a > FreeBSD suckea.com 5.3-SECURITY FreeBSD 5.3-SECURITY #0: Wed Jul 20 > 06:22:23 UTC 2005 > root@builder.daemonology.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 > > mybox# ls -lo > [snip] > -rwx------ 1 root wheel - 78 Dec 6 15:00 auth.log.zzpKVF1 > -rwx------ 1 root wheel - 78 Jan 3 05:00 auth.log.zzr4dZD > -rwx------ 1 root wheel - 78 Jan 4 17:00 auth.log.zzyP5R0 > > mybox# rm -rf auth.log.* > [snip] > rm: auth.log.zzr4dZD: Operation not permitted > rm: auth.log.zzyP5R0: Operation not permitted Is the partition mounted read-write? Can you run ktrace on this command and post the output? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 07:01:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9047C16A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 07:01:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from aiolos.otenet.gr (aiolos.otenet.gr [195.170.0.93]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D9A43D48 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 07:01:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) by aiolos.otenet.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-8) with SMTP id k0970wUW015269; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 09:00:58 +0200 Received: by flame.pc (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 276F111854; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 08:59:33 +0200 (EET) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 08:59:33 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: n-n Message-ID: <20060109065933.GB1026@flame.pc> References: <20060109060125.9191.qmail@web3310.mail.bbt.yahoo.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060109060125.9191.qmail@web3310.mail.bbt.yahoo.co.jp> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 07:01:01 -0000 On 2006-01-09 15:01, n-n wrote: > It is hoped that FreeBSD becomes a system like HP-UX. Hopefully not. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 07:09:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C34B416A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 07:09:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikejs@mbay.net) Received: from ms-smtp-01-eri0.socal.rr.com (ms-smtp-01-qfe0.socal.rr.com [66.75.162.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82CFD43D48 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 07:09:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mikejs@mbay.net) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (cpe-70-95-218-173.san.res.rr.com [70.95.218.173]) by ms-smtp-01-eri0.socal.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.7) with ESMTP id k0979j7v005388 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 23:09:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <43C20C3D.9040106@mbay.net> Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 23:09:49 -0800 From: Mike Sacauskis User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine Subject: php_XML_ParserCreate error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mikejs@mbay.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 07:09:49 -0000 Hi I'm trying to install mambo on a 5.4 release. I'm running into a problem with the mambo editor. I've traced it to an error in the apache log: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/lib/php/20020429/xml.so: Undefined symbol "php_XML_ParserCreate" I did an nm on the xml.so library and the symblols for php_XML_ParserCreate are undefined. 00006940 t parserInit U php_XML_ErrorString U php_XML_ExpatVersion U php_XML_GetCurrentByteIndex U php_XML_GetCurrentColumnNumber U php_XML_GetCurrentLineNumber U php_XML_GetErrorCode U php_XML_Parse U php_XML_ParserCreate U php_XML_ParserCreateNS U php_XML_ParserFree U php_XML_SetCharacterDataHandler U php_XML_SetDefaultHandler U php_XML_SetElementHandler U php_XML_SetEndNamespaceDeclHandler U php_XML_SetExternalEntityRefHandler U php_XML_SetNotationDeclHandler U php_XML_SetProcessingInstructionHandler U php_XML_SetStartNamespaceDeclHandler U php_XML_SetUnparsedEntityDeclHandler U php_XML_SetUserData U php_error_docref0 There are macros in /usr/ports/lang/php4/work/php-4.4.1/main that map the php_XML routines to XML_ routines. Is this how these symbols are supposed to be resolved? If so is there something that needs to be configured to allow this? These are the ports I have installed: apache-1.3.34_3 The extremely popular Apache http server. Very fast, very php4-4.4.1_3 PHP Scripting Language (Apache Module and CLI) php4-gd-4.4.1_3 The gd shared extension for php php4-mysql-4.4.1_3 The mysql shared extension for php php4-pcre-4.4.1_3 The pcre shared extension for php php4-session-4.4.1_3 The session shared extension for php php4-xml-4.4.1_3 The xml shared extension for php php4-zlib-4.4.1_3 The zlib shared extension for php Any help would be greatly appreciated. Mike Sacauskis From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 07:31:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 858E216A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 07:31:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 527CF43D46 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 07:30:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k097UnnZ027858; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 07:30:49 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <43C21122.7080708@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 07:30:42 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051221) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thiago Esteves References: <20060109021957.4257.qmail@web30010.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20060109021957.4257.qmail@web30010.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig6E0F9CA57A2B88214607345D" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Mon, 09 Jan 2006 07:30:49 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1235/Sun Jan 8 18:13:01 2006 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.4, /etc/default/make.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 07:31:01 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig6E0F9CA57A2B88214607345D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thiago Esteves wrote: > Why isn't there /etc/default/make.conf on FreeBSD 5.4 ? Because there's a /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf instead. It was moved because unlike the other inhabitants of /etc/default it had no effect whatsoever on invocations of make(1). Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig6E0F9CA57A2B88214607345D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDwhEp8Mjk52CukIwRA+29AJ9AHlu71yyIlcqgALZiVVv7HmN9OQCfZyho D4jGa7gebipM1Yo10SOOcTI= =/gqF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig6E0F9CA57A2B88214607345D-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 07:37:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA41216A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 07:37:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from hobbiton.shire.net (hobbiton.shire.net [166.70.252.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C8A943D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 07:37:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from [67.161.222.227] (helo=[192.168.99.68]) by hobbiton.shire.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.51) id 1EvrbI-0009Rb-BM for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:37:56 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <4ADE8A8F-858B-4092-958B-88C6DA832729@shire.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: Free BSD Questions list From: Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 00:37:57 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.161.222.227 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: chad@shire.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on hobbiton.shire.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: speccing an NFS server -- smp good or bad? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 07:37:58 -0000 For a FBSD (or Solaris 10) based server that is only acting as an NFS server and nothing else, is there any advantage to using an SMP machine? Any disadvantage? Does CPU speed play any great factor (ie, use a 1.8ghz opteron instead of a 2.2ghz opteron for example)? I am planning for a Spring project to make an nfs server that serves to multiple web servers / application servers using an Areca 1130 SATA raid card. I assume lots of RAM for the OS to use to cache would be desirable and GB ethernet. Thanks Chad --- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Your Web App and Email hosting provider chad at shire.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 07:41:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3163C16A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 07:41:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout5.cac.washington.edu (mxout5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C13D843D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 07:41:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9]) by mxout5.cac.washington.edu (8.13.5+UW05.10/8.13.5+UW05.09) with ESMTP id k097fYpG005577 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 23:41:34 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.23] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.5+UW05.10/8.13.5+UW05.09) with ESMTP id k097fX2I030543 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 23:41:33 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) In-Reply-To: <8C520B67-731D-4064-967F-BDD017FE3C28@disflux.com> References: <4053413D-A3D3-4553-A1C9-49E92CD1D1F9@u.washington.edu> <8C520B67-731D-4064-967F-BDD017FE3C28@disflux.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <94556B3B-CA17-40D0-BC5B-1D35CA87CBE7@u.washington.edu> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Garrett Cooper Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2006 23:42:26 -0800 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' Subject: Re: Extremely slow authentication via SSH on FreeBSD 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 07:41:35 -0000 On Jan 8, 2006, at 9:10 PM, Derek Musselmann wrote: > On Jan 8, 2006, at 7:21 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> I'm having a hard time authenticating after upgrading the kernel >> and some packages, and I was wondering if someone could help me >> out with this issue. I marked the trouble points and included my >> sshd_config. > > I noticed in your sshd_config that you have: > > # Change to yes to enable built-in password authentication. > PasswordAuthentication yes > PermitEmptyPasswords no > > # Change to no to disable PAM authentication > ChallengeResponseAuthentication no > > > By default, ssh uses PAM for authentication. By commenting those > lines out, it doesn't mean that password checking won't be done, > just that it will be handled with PAM. > > And then later in the file you have: > UsePAM yes > > Try commenting out the PasswordAuthentication, > PermitEmptyPasswords, and ChallengeResponse lines. > > ----- > Derek Musselmann > http://www.disflux.com Tried exactly that, and it doesn't seem to have change the performance, actually =\... It still hangs in the same location, strangely enough. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 07:44:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C60F16A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 07:44:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jayobrien@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C04C843D66 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 07:44:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jayobrien@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i20so3502978wra for ; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 23:44:45 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=bM0O400llqeUfElYw9DT7MXsfe4Rmk1mpSMaLKR7ubBfzgrj+DW7MWJE03Q8qs+da4AeUPucMWkDRHfq/eBq0UrBSQRIEECZOSzArwo9m4XfRCldNDJXnkCov+hWRnPJifMwvd5ZSMYlGUqNewYZgMWjBUewcFX6X9OwtE0y0eI= Received: by 10.54.72.15 with SMTP id u15mr7880548wra; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 23:44:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.6? ( [66.93.180.184]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 64sm20876847wra.2006.01.08.23.44.43; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 23:44:44 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <43C2146B.4060806@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 23:44:43 -0800 From: Jay O'Brien User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD - questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: FTP stopped working X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 07:44:46 -0000 I'm embarassed to say that FreeBSD was working so good for me that I forgot how to make it work. It was up for over 300 days when I rebooted today. All of a sudden I cannot access the computer via ftp. I have been able to do so using WS_FTP Pro on my Windows CP Pro computer, but now it doesn't even seem to accept the connect. The connect is via a local LAN, using fixed IPs. Guidance in a troubleshooting mode would really be appreciated. Thanks, Jay O'Brien Rio Linda, CA , USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 08:08:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10CCC16A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 08:08:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from rosebud.otenet.gr (rosebud.otenet.gr [195.170.0.94]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 653F243D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 08:08:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) by rosebud.otenet.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-8) with SMTP id k0988CVO030697; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 10:08:13 +0200 Received: by flame.pc (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8168311825; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 10:06:46 +0200 (EET) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 10:06:46 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: "Jay O'Brien" Message-ID: <20060109080646.GA25172@flame.pc> References: <43C2146B.4060806@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43C2146B.4060806@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FTP stopped working X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 08:08:17 -0000 On 2006-01-08 23:44, Jay O'Brien wrote: > I'm embarassed to say that FreeBSD was working so good for me > that I forgot how to make it work. It was up for over 300 days > when I rebooted today. Oops :) > All of a sudden I cannot access the computer via ftp. I have > been able to do so using WS_FTP Pro on my Windows CP Pro > computer, but now it doesn't even seem to accept the connect. > The connect is via a local LAN, using fixed IPs. > > Guidance in a troubleshooting mode would really be appreciated. First check that you truly have the ftpd binary: root@flame:/root# ls -l /usr/libexec/ftpd -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 96360 Jan 8 13:00 /usr/libexec/ftpd Then see if ftpd is supposed to start as 'standalone' or as a service controlled by inetd: root@flame:/root# grep ftp /etc/rc.conf root@flame:/root# grep inetd /etc/rc.conf inetd_enable="YES" root@flame:/root# pgrep inet 651 root@flame:/root# grep '^[[:space:]]*ftp' /etc/inetd.conf ftp stream tcp nowait root /usr/libexec/ftpd ftpd -l If inetd is running, pgrep should report its PID as above. Seeing no PID means that inetd failed to start. Your system logs at /var/log/messages will almost certainly have clues about the reason of the failure. Then, start checking if something *is* listening at port 21: root@flame:/root# netstat -na | fgrep LISTEN | grep [:.]21 tcp4 0 0 *.21 *.* LISTEN root@flame:/root# sockstat -4 -l -p 21 USER COMMAND PID FD PROTO LOCAL ADDRESS FOREIGN ADDRESS root inetd 651 5 tcp4 *:21 *:* root@flame:/root# If you don't have any indication how ftpd was started it's possible that you manually fired up ftpd and then promptly forgot about it, until you had to reboot. Stability is nice, isn't it? :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 08:15:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F75116A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 08:15:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout4.cac.washington.edu (mxout4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62ECD43D4C for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 08:15:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout4.cac.washington.edu (8.13.5+UW05.10/8.13.5+UW05.09) with ESMTP id k098FHVL012685 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 9 Jan 2006 00:15:17 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.23] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.5+UW05.10/8.13.5+UW05.09) with ESMTP id k098FGqJ010788 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 9 Jan 2006 00:15:17 -0800 In-Reply-To: <000d01c614ef$c85ec0b0$0900a8c0@satellite> References: <4053413D-A3D3-4553-A1C9-49E92CD1D1F9@u.washington.edu> <8C520B67-731D-4064-967F-BDD017FE3C28@disflux.com> <94556B3B-CA17-40D0-BC5B-1D35CA87CBE7@u.washington.edu> <000d01c614ef$c85ec0b0$0900a8c0@satellite> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) X-Priority: 3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <79C69FC8-EDF0-4417-847D-6CED49EA6807@u.washington.edu> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Garrett Cooper Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 00:16:10 -0800 To: Dave X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Extremely slow authentication via SSH on FreeBSD 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 08:15:19 -0000 On Jan 8, 2006, at 11:39 PM, Dave wrote: > Hi, > I caught this midthread, but two things. Are you running sshd in > a jail? And do you have dns resolving? I recently had an ssh slow > authentication issue, which when found was dns not resolving. Try > setting UseDns to no in sshd_config see if that helps. > HTH > Dave. > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Garrett Cooper" > > To: > Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 2:42 AM > Subject: Re: Extremely slow authentication via SSH on FreeBSD 6.0 > > >> >> On Jan 8, 2006, at 9:10 PM, Derek Musselmann wrote: >> >>> On Jan 8, 2006, at 7:21 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: >>>> I'm having a hard time authenticating after upgrading the >>>> kernel and some packages, and I was wondering if someone could >>>> help me out with this issue. I marked the trouble points and >>>> included my sshd_config. >>> >>> I noticed in your sshd_config that you have: >>> >>> # Change to yes to enable built-in password authentication. >>> PasswordAuthentication yes >>> PermitEmptyPasswords no >>> >>> # Change to no to disable PAM authentication >>> ChallengeResponseAuthentication no >>> >>> >>> By default, ssh uses PAM for authentication. By commenting >>> those lines out, it doesn't mean that password checking won't be >>> done, just that it will be handled with PAM. >>> >>> And then later in the file you have: >>> UsePAM yes >>> >>> Try commenting out the PasswordAuthentication, >>> PermitEmptyPasswords, and ChallengeResponse lines. >>> >>> ----- >>> Derek Musselmann >>> http://www.disflux.com >> >> Tried exactly that, and it doesn't seem to have change the >> performance, actually =\... It still hangs in the same location, >> strangely enough. >> -Garrett VOILA! Gratzi sir! -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 08:17:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A6D116A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 08:17:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout7.cac.washington.edu (mxout7.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7AC243D5F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 08:17:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout7.cac.washington.edu (8.13.5+UW05.10/8.13.5+UW05.09) with ESMTP id k098HQc7029712 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 00:17:27 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.23] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.5+UW05.10/8.13.5+UW05.09) with ESMTP id k098HNql010876 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 00:17:26 -0800 In-Reply-To: <000d01c614ef$c85ec0b0$0900a8c0@satellite> References: <4053413D-A3D3-4553-A1C9-49E92CD1D1F9@u.washington.edu> <8C520B67-731D-4064-967F-BDD017FE3C28@disflux.com> <94556B3B-CA17-40D0-BC5B-1D35CA87CBE7@u.washington.edu> <000d01c614ef$c85ec0b0$0900a8c0@satellite> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) X-Priority: 3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Garrett Cooper Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 00:18:16 -0800 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' Subject: Re: Extremely slow authentication via SSH on FreeBSD 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 08:17:41 -0000 On Jan 8, 2006, at 11:39 PM, Dave wrote: > Hi, > I caught this midthread, but two things. Are you running sshd in > a jail? And do you have dns resolving? I recently had an ssh slow > authentication issue, which when found was dns not resolving. Try > setting UseDns to no in sshd_config see if that helps. > HTH > Dave. > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Garrett Cooper" > > To: > Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 2:42 AM > Subject: Re: Extremely slow authentication via SSH on FreeBSD 6.0 > > >> >> On Jan 8, 2006, at 9:10 PM, Derek Musselmann wrote: >> >>> On Jan 8, 2006, at 7:21 PM, Garrett Cooper wrote: >>>> I'm having a hard time authenticating after upgrading the >>>> kernel and some packages, and I was wondering if someone could >>>> help me out with this issue. I marked the trouble points and >>>> included my sshd_config. >>> >>> I noticed in your sshd_config that you have: >>> >>> # Change to yes to enable built-in password authentication. >>> PasswordAuthentication yes >>> PermitEmptyPasswords no >>> >>> # Change to no to disable PAM authentication >>> ChallengeResponseAuthentication no >>> >>> >>> By default, ssh uses PAM for authentication. By commenting >>> those lines out, it doesn't mean that password checking won't be >>> done, just that it will be handled with PAM. >>> >>> And then later in the file you have: >>> UsePAM yes >>> >>> Try commenting out the PasswordAuthentication, >>> PermitEmptyPasswords, and ChallengeResponse lines. >>> >>> ----- >>> Derek Musselmann >>> http://www.disflux.com >> >> Tried exactly that, and it doesn't seem to have change the >> performance, actually =\... It still hangs in the same location, >> strangely enough. >> -Garrett I should be more specific. Setting UseDNS to no did the trick. Maybe sshd was confused by my hostname setup in /etc/hosts, but I'm not going to speculate there. All that I know is that it works like it used to =). -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 08:32:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C90FB16A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 08:32:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robsworld2000@yahoo.com) Received: from web54413.mail.yahoo.com (web54413.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.49.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3CECC43D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 08:32:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robsworld2000@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 26250 invoked by uid 60001); 9 Jan 2006 08:32:00 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=VEnHqSSBJAKWU4m1GU52/PEPN6UaYVJj+8eMVbxGblkgPva+XtccB+CLJWpEziCV1XWLrg2lBzislSlQabmrC8grPfPuTKktV1RRlIwJxB8OS2t71AdltsXqk02L1n8dNWOztkjj9RzFBndHo496BY7fjMdyDRA7IoaZa1aF73A= ; Message-ID: <20060109083200.26248.qmail@web54413.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [202.69.171.6] by web54413.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 00:32:00 PST Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 00:32:00 -0800 (PST) From: Robert Stevenson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: SSH problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 08:32:01 -0000 I'm able to log-in to my FreeBSD box using SSH just a few days ago, but now I can't. Whenever I try I only get to enter my username and the password prompt does not appear anymore. It seems authentication stops after I enter my username. I'm using PUTTY as a client I can login directly to the box and I could see that SSHD is running. Any ideas what's wrong with it? __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 09:01:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A6716A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 09:01:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jas@math.jussieu.fr) Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3640543D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 09:01:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jas@math.jussieu.fr) Received: from riemann.math.jussieu.fr (riemann.math.jussieu.fr [134.157.13.3]) by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.13.5/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id k0991Y1d094860 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 10:01:35 +0100 (CET) X-Ids: 166 Received: from grobner2.math.jussieu.fr (grobner2.math.jussieu.fr [134.157.13.119]) by riemann.math.jussieu.fr (8.12.10/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id k0991WFk031019 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 10:01:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from grobner2.math.jussieu.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by grobner2.math.jussieu.fr (8.13.1/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id k0991Vw5002054 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 10:01:32 +0100 Received: (from jas@localhost) by grobner2.math.jussieu.fr (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id k0991VCq002053 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 10:01:31 +0100 Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 10:01:31 +0100 From: Albert Shih To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060109090131.GY24383@math.jussieu.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Spam-Score: -1.44 () ALL_TRUSTED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.54 on 134.157.13.3 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.7.2 (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.166]); Mon, 09 Jan 2006 10:01:35 +0100 (CET) X-Antivirus: scanned by sophie at shiva.jussieu.fr Subject: portsnap vs cvsup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: shih@math.jussieu.fr List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 09:01:41 -0000 Hi all What's the advantage of portsnap vs old-fashion cvsup ? Lots of thanks. Regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. Heure local/Local time: Mon Jan 9 10:00:00 CET 2006 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 09:10:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36AEA16A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 09:10:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bobself@charter.net) Received: from mxsf26.cluster1.charter.net (mxsf26.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8EBA43D46 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 09:10:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bobself@charter.net) Received: from mxip09a.cluster1.charter.net (mxip09a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.139]) by mxsf26.cluster1.charter.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k099A0cD023721 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 04:10:01 -0500 Received: from 24-197-117-006.dhcp.spbg.sc.charter.com (HELO [192.168.1.101]) ([24.197.117.6]) by mxip09a.cluster1.charter.net with ESMTP; 09 Jan 2006 04:10:01 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: i="3.99,345,1131339600"; d="scan'208"; a="1800165351:sNHT24769240" Message-ID: <43C22866.6070405@charter.net> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 04:09:58 -0500 From: bob self User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: JD Arnold References: <43BD511F.7010403@charter.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how do you install wx-config in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 09:10:07 -0000 JD Arnold wrote: .... Thanks. Things are starting to work. Now that wx-config works a couple more questions have come up about wxgtk2. I tried building the penguin sample that comes with wxWidgets. I get a link warning: /usr/bin/ld: warning: libm.so.3, needed by /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1, not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link) When I try to run it, I get: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libm.so.3" not found, required by "libGL.so.1" How do I fix this problem? All of my ports are supposed to be up-to-date. Also, another issue came up when I tried to compile the mediactrl example: winmain.cpp:88:2: #error "Not all required elements are enabled. Please modify setup.h!" winmain.cpp:196: error: `wxMediaEvent' has not been declared How do you do this in FreeBSD if you use portupgrade? Is there a config file to turn on the mediactrl stuff? I'm compiling with g++ -I/usr/X11R6/include -c `wx-config --cxxflags` winmain.cpp # wx-config --cxxflags shows: -I/usr/X11R6/include/wx-2.6/gtk2-ansi-release-2.6 -I/usr/X11R6/include/wx-2.6 -DGTK_NO_CHECK_CASTS -D__WXGTK__ -D_FILE_OFFSET_BI TS=64 -D_LARGE_FILES -DNO_GCC_PRAGMA Bob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 09:22:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52D1216A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 09:22:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bobself@charter.net) Received: from mxsf13.cluster1.charter.net (mxsf13.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.213]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C52FA43D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 09:22:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bobself@charter.net) Received: from mxip28a.cluster1.charter.net (mxip28a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.187]) by mxsf13.cluster1.charter.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k099MZGr027505 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 04:22:35 -0500 Received: from 24-197-117-006.dhcp.spbg.sc.charter.com (HELO [192.168.1.101]) ([24.197.117.6]) by mxip28a.cluster1.charter.net with ESMTP; 09 Jan 2006 04:22:35 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: i="3.99,346,1131339600"; d="scan'208"; a="651458322:sNHT16214556" Message-ID: <43C22B59.4070709@charter.net> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 04:22:33 -0500 From: bob self User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: JD Arnold References: <43BD511F.7010403@charter.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how do you install wx-config in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 09:22:37 -0000 JD Arnold wrote: > bob self wrote: > >> I'm running FreeBSD 6.0 and have installed >> wxgtk2-2.6.2_1 and wxgtk2-common-2.6.2. >> >> VLC runs fine so I know that wxwidges is installed correctly. But I >> want to install the wxsamples >> and compile them. I copied wxsamples manually and try to compile >> using a script from an older >> freebsd system but it wants wx-config and I can't find out how to get >> that installed using the >> ports. Which port would include that? > > > wx-config is in the wxWidgets port, only it is named using the version > of wxgtk: > > /usr/X11R6/bin/wxgtk2-2.6-config > > I guess maybe they don't want to overwrite any existing wx-config, but I > suppose it would be nice if the port installer checked for it, and if it > didn't exist, create it using a link. You should do that (as root): > > # cd /usr/X11R6/bin > # ln wx-gtk2-2.6-config wx-config > > You can find out whether it got intalled by the wxgtk port by using > pkg_info: > > # pkg_info -xL wxgtk | grep bin > > would should show where the -config and the wxrc got installed. > > BTW, I talk about the pkg_info option in a recent post on my blog. Thanks > to Dru from OnLamp.com for showing me this very cool option, something > I've > always wondered about, as sometimes it can be very mysterious as to > what and > where a port might install stuff. > I did find setup.h in /usr/X11R6/include/wx-2.6/gtk2-ansi-release-2.6 I installed wxgtk2 using portupgrade but no configuration screen came up. What is the procedure to configure wxgtk2 if you use portupgrade? I see that my setup.h has #define wxUSE_MEDIACTRL 0 which is not what I want, so I need to reconfigure it but haven't been able to find out how to do that. Bob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 09:25:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FC1F16A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 09:25:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jean-baptiste.potonnier@atosorigin.com) Received: from smtp1.mail.atosorigin.com (smtp1.mail.atosorigin.com [160.92.103.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5CA043D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 09:25:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jean-baptiste.potonnier@atosorigin.com) Received: from [55.5.6.103] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwumf0102.mail.fr.ww.atosorigin.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 123C21C00095 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 10:25:25 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43C22C5A.9020901@atosorigin.com> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 10:26:50 +0100 From: Jean-Baptiste Potonnier User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.9 (Windows/20041103) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <43BD2FD4.50808@atosorigin.com> In-Reply-To: <43BD2FD4.50808@atosorigin.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.0 and Shuttle AMD64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 09:25:40 -0000 OK, FreeBSD runs great on this machine. The problem was my CD burner... Thanks to Crispy Beef for his answers, and please excuse me for noise on the list. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 09:59:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E599416A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 09:59:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ltsampros@upnet.gr) Received: from mail.vivodinet.gr (mail3.vivodinet.gr [80.76.39.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D2E9C43D46 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 09:59:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ltsampros@upnet.gr) Received: (qmail 27713 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2006 09:57:21 -0000 Received: from dslcustomer-222-89.vivodi.gr (HELO bifteki.tiganaki) (83.171.222.89) by 0 with SMTP; 9 Jan 2006 09:57:21 -0000 Received: from bifteki.tiganaki (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bifteki.tiganaki (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k099vED3003627; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:57:15 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from gaghiel@bifteki.tiganaki) Received: (from gaghiel@localhost) by bifteki.tiganaki (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k099vEQk003626; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:57:14 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from gaghiel) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:57:14 +0200 From: Leonidas Tsampros To: Robert Stevenson Message-ID: <20060109095713.GA3469@bifteki.lan> References: <20060109083200.26248.qmail@web54413.mail.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060109083200.26248.qmail@web54413.mail.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SSH problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 09:59:46 -0000 On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 12:32:00AM -0800, Robert Stevenson wrote: > I'm able to log-in to my FreeBSD box using SSH just a > few days ago, but now I can't. Whenever I try I only > get to enter my username and the password prompt does > not appear anymore. It seems authentication stops > after I enter my username. I'm using PUTTY as a client > > I can login directly to the box and I could see that > SSHD is running. Any ideas what's wrong with it? > > I've encountered a similar situation some time ago with a firewall i used to run. To troobleshoot the sshd daemon, just login to your box, shut down the sshd that's running with $ /etc/rc.d/sshd stop and then run sshd in debug mode with verbose output by running $ /usr/sbin/sshd -D -f /etc/ssh/sshd_config by running this command the daemon will run but it will not detach itself in the background, but instead will output lots of debuging information. After that try to login using putty, and take a look at the last 10-20 lines of the login process. There should be enough information about the nature of the error. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 10:22:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C62616A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 10:22:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9507943D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 10:22:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k09APpP59355; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 02:25:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Ceri Davies" Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 02:22:19 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <9270E4E0-F4E9-4F2E-BCF0-DBF360E16D53@submonkey.net> Importance: Normal Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Robert Slade Subject: RE: Spamcop listed - need help to diagnose why X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 10:22:33 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Ceri Davies >Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2006 2:44 AM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt >Cc: questions@freebsd.org; Robert Slade >Subject: Re: Spamcop listed - need help to diagnose why > > > >On 8 Jan 2006, at 05:03, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Robert Slade >>> Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 11:24 PM >>> To: David Banning >>> Cc: questions@freebsd.org >>> Subject: Re: Spamcop listed - need help to diagnose why >>> >>> >>> >>> There is your problem TMDA is most likely the cause. Such >>> programmes are >>> in effect adding to the spam problem. Nearly all spam has a forged >>> from >>> address and all programmes such as TMDA do is send a challenge to an >>> innocent 3rd party. Whist it looks like it reduces your spam all >>> you do >>> is in effect spam someone else. When your e-mail address has been >>> used >>> in a spam run by a spammer and you start getting 10s of these >>> challenge >>> an hour it is quite easy to report 1 my accident. If you look at the >>> Spamcop reporting page you will see a warning about just this >>> situation. >>> >>> I suppose that the real answer is to stop compounding the spam >>> problem >>> and use a combination of spamassassin and block lists. >>> >>> BTW I make it a point never to respond to challenges. >>> >> >> Ditto, and for the same reasons. I've removed David from the cc >> list on this for that reason as well. >> >> Also we need to be aware of another trick that spammers have >> figured out, that applies to anyone running multiple MX records on >> a domain (I don't know if David is in that situation) >> >> Normally if a domain has a single mailserver processing incoming >> mail, there's a single MX record pointing to a single machine. But >> in many cases it's desirable to relay mail through a prefilter system >> before it gets to the actual mailserver. In those cases a common >> trick is to block the highest priority MX host off with an access >> list. Senders try the highest priority, it fails, they then go to >> the next highest priority host which is the relay host. That host >> gets it, does it's thing, then tries to send it to the highest >> priority server which should work since the access list permits that >> server. This technique has been mentioned in the sendmail book >> among others. > >Yes, but that is actually massively rude. The hosts listed in a >domain's MX record are supposed to be hosts willing to exchange mail >for that domain, so listing ones that are not it just wasting >everyone's time and resources. > I guess your not a fan of greylisting, then. ;-) That is a very limited view of the real issues. So limited, in fact, that it's not correct. Consider for a moment, what the point of prefiltering is. Prefilters are used on mailservers that do not have adequate or in fact, any, capabilities for antivirus and spam scanning. As in, older Exchange 5.5 servers, Lotus Notes mailservers, etc. Every time an admin brings up a prefilter on a mailserver that previously was unrestricted, it makes hundreds if not thousands of spams and virus mails that previously were delivered, now become ineffective. Thus, systems that would have previously gotten infected, now won't, and users that previously would have been duped into sending money to a criminal spammer, now are not. This reduces the critical mass of infectable mailservers that is required to sustain the chain reaction needed to make mass-mailserver viruses actually work in the wild, and it reduces income to the criminal spammer, thus making spamming less attractive as a criminal endeavor, thus fewer spammers. The damage done to the Internet by just a single host that might previously gotten infected with a mass-mailer, but now isn't, far outweighs the damage done to the Internet by having legitimate mail to a domain be delayed for a few minutes. Obviously the best choice is to replace the mailserver, good luck though in companies using Lotus Notes. Also, keep in mind that EVERY SINGLE mailserver that sends to a "delayed MX" setup, CHOOSES to send mail to them. If a mailserver does not want to be delayed, they can choose to blacklist the domain or otherwise not send mail to it. Otherwise, this isn't a situation of "wasting everyone's time and resources" it is a situation of wasting the time and resources of the people who are choosing to send mail to you. Those senders can choose to not have their time and resources wasted by this if they want. Nobody is holding a gun to your head and telling you that you have to send mail to some "massively rude" domain. You are choosing to mail them. This is quite a different situation than mail forgery. I frankly consider people that send me HTMLized mail to be massively rude, but I choose to send mail to them and so they are going to mail be back with their HTMLized stuff. Your bitching because you consider MX-based prefilters rude, but this only applies to the domains you are wanting to mail - you can simply choose not to mail them to express your feelings. Nobody else on the Internet is bothered that your own personal mail to your own recipients gets delayed, so I think your mistaken in calling this massively rude. Massively rude is opening your trap in a restaurant and letting out a massive belch, the other diners in the restaurant do not have a choice, they have to listen to you. On the Internet, the other people on it don't have to listen to your own server retrying to your own recipients. Hopefully you get the analogy here. >If you want to have such a prefilter system, there is no need to list >the end system in the MX records; just use an internal route to do that. > A very crude way of doing it. A more sophisticated way of doing it is running a set of internal nameservers that hold the multiple MX records, and that only the mailserver uses. However, you are also fundamentally missing the point of the scam as well. ANY prefilter system even if you use internal routes, or a second set of nameservers, is able to be hijacked by a spammer in this manner. And a spammer can detect prefilter hosts simply by sending a single forgery with a legitimate senders address and a bogus recipient address, and when the message is bounced, they can look at the headers and see if a prefilter is involved. They don't even have to look at the DNS MX records. The only solution is to let the prefilter know about all legitimate userID's and mail addresses, so it can bounce user-not-found messages. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 10:28:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D863416A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 10:28:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52BFF43D46 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 10:28:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k09AW4P59376; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 02:32:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Peter Leftwich" Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 02:28:33 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <20060108150831.H19665@rocket.alienwebshop.com> Importance: Normal Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Robert Slade Subject: RE: /dev/eth0 question [FC4] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 10:28:48 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: Peter Leftwich [mailto:Hostmaster@Video2Video.Com] >Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2006 12:20 PM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt >Cc: Robert Slade; questions@freebsd.org >Subject: RE: /dev/eth0 question [FC4] > > >On Sat, 7 Jan 2006, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: >> He probably thinks the competence level on this list is >higher. Kind of >> makes you wonder why he's running their OS. ;-) >> Ted > >Bingo! *grins* I would really truly rather be running FreeBSD >right now, >but the SUPER extra EASY GUI installer for FC4 was just SO MUCH >SIMPLER and >inviting, and if I may venture to say... even easier than any M$FT one. > GUI? we don't need no steenkin GUI. Seriously, don't forget the entire point of a gui is to isolate you further and further from what is actually going on, so you learn less and less. The 'dumbing down' of the userbase is what it is. If you can get them dumbed down enough so they are completely helpless, then they will start paying you for free software. The original BSD used a shell script to install, if you can believe it. We never used to get questions of the form "how do I add a disk drive to my system" until they went away from that. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 10:36:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F415816A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 10:36:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from work@ashleymoran.me.uk) Received: from mail.dc-servers.com (mail.dc-servers.com [83.243.101.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9736143D5D for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 10:36:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from work@ashleymoran.me.uk) Received: (qmail 32718 invoked by uid 399); 9 Jan 2006 10:41:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO alfie.jigsawhq.com) (work@ashleymoran.me.uk@213.106.224.113) by mail.dc-servers.com with SMTP; 9 Jan 2006 10:41:05 -0000 From: Ashley Moran Organization: Codeweavers Ltd To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 10:36:14 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <4053413D-A3D3-4553-A1C9-49E92CD1D1F9@u.washington.edu> <000d01c614ef$c85ec0b0$0900a8c0@satellite> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200601091036.14827.work@ashleymoran.me.uk> Subject: Re: Extremely slow authentication via SSH on FreeBSD 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 10:36:31 -0000 On Monday 09 January 2006 08:18, Garrett Cooper wrote: > =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0I should be more specific. Setting UseDNS to no d= id the trick. > Maybe =A0 sshd was confused by my hostname setup in /etc/hosts, but I'm n= ot > going to speculate there. All that I know is that it works like it used to > =3D). > -Garrett I've had this problem before. You can keep DNS turned on if /etc/resolv.co= nf=20 contains reachable nameservers. The DNS lookup timeout in sshd is very long Ashley From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 11:16:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AF3C16A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:16:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-3-1-cust208.cdif.cable.ntl.com [82.31.78.208]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF69843D49 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:16:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from ceri by shrike.submonkey.net with local (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Evv0x-000JAx-25; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 11:16:39 +0000 Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:16:37 +0000 From: Ceri Davies To: Ted Mittelstaedt Message-ID: <20060109111637.GG97223@submonkey.net> Mail-Followup-To: Ceri Davies , Ted Mittelstaedt , questions@freebsd.org, Robert Slade References: <9270E4E0-F4E9-4F2E-BCF0-DBF360E16D53@submonkey.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="j2AXaZ4YhVcLc+PQ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-PGP: finger ceri@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: Ceri Davies Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Robert Slade Subject: Re: Spamcop listed - need help to diagnose why X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 11:16:41 -0000 --j2AXaZ4YhVcLc+PQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 02:22:19AM -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > >-----Original Message----- > >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Ceri Davies > >Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2006 2:44 AM > >To: Ted Mittelstaedt > >Cc: questions@freebsd.org; Robert Slade > >Subject: Re: Spamcop listed - need help to diagnose why > > > >> Normally if a domain has a single mailserver processing incoming > >> mail, there's a single MX record pointing to a single machine. But > >> in many cases it's desirable to relay mail through a prefilter system > >> before it gets to the actual mailserver. In those cases a common > >> trick is to block the highest priority MX host off with an access > >> list. Senders try the highest priority, it fails, they then go to > >> the next highest priority host which is the relay host. That host > >> gets it, does it's thing, then tries to send it to the highest > >> priority server which should work since the access list permits that > >> server. This technique has been mentioned in the sendmail book > >> among others. > > > >Yes, but that is actually massively rude. The hosts listed in a > >domain's MX record are supposed to be hosts willing to exchange mail > >for that domain, so listing ones that are not it just wasting > >everyone's time and resources. > > >=20 > I guess your not a fan of greylisting, then. ;-) I'm not, but that's not quite the same thing. A greylisting MX will still accept my message, it just might take it's time. Saying "not at the moment, please try later" is much more polite than ignoring someone, and has the additional benefit of not wasting my time waiting for a response I'm never going to get. The analogy fits. > That is a very limited view of the real issues. So limited, in fact, > that it's not correct. I'm obviously going to disagree with that. :) > Consider for a moment, what the point of prefiltering is. Prefilters are > used on mailservers that do not have adequate or in fact, any, capabiliti= es > for antivirus and spam scanning. As in, older Exchange 5.5 servers, Lotus > Notes mailservers, etc. Agreed. > Every time an admin brings up a prefilter on a mailserver that previously > was unrestricted, it makes hundreds if not thousands of spams and virus m= ails > that previously were delivered, now become ineffective. Thus, systems th= at > would have previously gotten infected, now won't, and users that previous= ly would > have been duped into sending money to a criminal spammer, now are not. Agreed. > This reduces the critical mass of infectable mailservers that is required > to sustain the chain reaction needed to make mass-mailserver viruses actu= ally work > in the wild, and it reduces income to the criminal spammer, thus making > spamming less attractive as a criminal endeavor, thus fewer spammers. Agreed. > The damage done to the Internet by just a single host that might > previously gotten infected with a mass-mailer, but now isn't, far > outweighs the damage done > to the Internet by having legitimate mail to a domain be delayed for a few > minutes. > > Obviously the best choice is to replace the mailserver, good luck though > in companies using Lotus Notes. Agreed, but my point is that there is no need to delay the mail. Simply not listing the MX record in the public DNS would achieve the exact same thing, without forcing my MTA to wait for a timeout. > Also, keep in mind that EVERY SINGLE mailserver that sends to a "delayed > MX" setup, CHOOSES to send mail to them. This tirade doesn't really have anything to do with my point above, but bear in mind that in order to find out if my attempt to send mail will time out, I have to try to send mail first. I don't get to choose, as the only mechanism that I have for distinguishing systems willing to receive mail from those that are not has been made meaningless. > Your bitching because you consider MX-based prefilters rude, but this > only applies to the domains you are wanting to mail - you can simply > choose not to mail them to express your feelings. See above. > Nobody else on the Internet is bothered that your own > personal mail to your own recipients gets delayed, so I think your > mistaken in calling this massively rude. Well of course they aren't, but nobody else on the Internet is bothered if I take a crap on your doorstep. That doesn't preclude it from being completely out of order. > Massively rude is opening your trap in a restaurant and letting out a > massive belch, the other diners in the restaurant do not have a choice, > they have to listen to you. > On the Internet, the other people on it don't have to listen to your own > server retrying to your own recipients. Hopefully you get the analogy he= re. I don't think it applies. The other diners had a choice of going somewhere else or of staying home, except that I invited them to come and then belched. The real analogy is an advert that says: Call 123-456-7890 or 123-456-7891 to speak to us. We'd prefer it if you called 123-456-7890 as it's cheaper for us. This is exactly what MX records state. Then you just let 123-456-7890 ring, with no intention of ever picking it up. Saying "so don't call" isn't good enough, as I have to ring it to find out that nobody is answering, and I *still* don't know if they will answer next time I call; there is certainly no indication that they won't, and I have a card in my hand that says that they will. > >If you want to have such a prefilter system, there is no need to list > >the end system in the MX records; just use an internal route to do that. >=20 > A very crude way of doing it. A more sophisticated way of doing it is > running a set of internal nameservers that hold the multiple MX records, > and that only the mailserver uses. Bah, implementation detail. :-) > However, you are also fundamentally missing the point of the scam as > well. ANY prefilter system even if you use internal routes, or a second > set of nameservers, is able to be hijacked by a spammer in this manner. > And a spammer can detect prefilter hosts simply by sending a single > forgery with a legitimate senders address and a bogus recipient address, > and when the message is bounced, they can look at the headers and see > if a prefilter is involved. They don't even have to look at the > DNS MX records. I don't see how I am missing the fundamental point; I never made any attempt to address it. All I said was that listing systems that do not exchange mail in the mail exchanger records is rude, and you can not convince me otherwise. Ceri --=20 Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. -- Einstein (attrib.) --j2AXaZ4YhVcLc+PQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDwkYVocfcwTS3JF8RAq4aAJ4/lnA1hZmpWkSf7y4XGtBXPsLHEQCgo+ZY 6K5DW6YKcHHUFj7WJrM3d5o= =g9gR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --j2AXaZ4YhVcLc+PQ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 11:30:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4B6116A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:30:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74FDC43D4C for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:30:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EvvEP-0007Um-II for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 12:30:33 +0100 Received: from c-24-147-87-49.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([24.147.87.49]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 12:30:33 +0100 Received: from jdarnold by c-24-147-87-49.hsd1.ma.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 12:30:33 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Jonathan Arnold Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 06:30:38 -0500 Lines: 36 Message-ID: References: <43BD511F.7010403@charter.net> <43C22866.6070405@charter.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-24-147-87-49.hsd1.ma.comcast.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) In-Reply-To: <43C22866.6070405@charter.net> Sender: news Subject: Re: how do you install wx-config in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 11:30:41 -0000 bob self wrote: > JD Arnold wrote: > > .... > > > Thanks. Things are starting to work. Now that wx-config works a couple more > questions have come up about wxgtk2. I tried building the penguin sample > that > comes with wxWidgets. I get a link warning: > > /usr/bin/ld: warning: libm.so.3, needed by /usr/X11R6/lib/libGL.so.1, > not found (try using -rpath or > -rpath-link) > > When I try to run it, I get: > > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libm.so.3" not found, required by > "libGL.so.1" > > How do I fix this problem? All of my ports are supposed to be up-to-date. If I do a locate on libm.so.3, I see it in /usr/local/lib/compat. I see that the one in /usr/lib is libm.so.4. I don't know anything about either of these. That's why it is saying to use the -rpath option, to add /usr/local/lib/compat to your ld search path. You're probably pushing the envelope here, working with multimedia controls. You might try asking on the wxWidgets mailing list for more specific wxWidgets help. -- Jonathan Arnold (mailto:jdarnold@buddydog.org) Jiggle The Handle, a personal blog http://jiggle.anaze.us Procrastination is the art of keeping up with yesterday. - Don Marquis From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 11:32:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A49016A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:32:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6111343D46 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:32:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k09BW8wt013321; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 12:32:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k09BW3Z0013314; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 12:32:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 12:32:02 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" In-Reply-To: <4ADE8A8F-858B-4092-958B-88C6DA832729@shire.net> Message-ID: <20060109122752.D12901@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <4ADE8A8F-858B-4092-958B-88C6DA832729@shire.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Free BSD Questions list Subject: Re: speccing an NFS server -- smp good or bad? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 11:32:24 -0000 > For a FBSD (or Solaris 10) based server that is only acting as an NFS server > and nothing else, is there any advantage to using an SMP machine? Any no. one CPU is powerful enough. pentium 200 class machine does have no problems working as NFS server for 100Mbit/s LAN at full speed, assuming disk is able to cope with. > disadvantage? > > Does CPU speed play any great factor (ie, use a 1.8ghz opteron instead of a > 2.2ghz opteron for example)? no. with slowest available AMD64 CPU it will still be much overpowered. consider using that machine for other tasks too. but you will need motherboard with something better than 33Mhz 32-bit PCI and lots of ATA/SATA ports, or extra controllers plugged if you like this server to really be able to do 1000Mbit/s speed. > card. I assume lots of RAM for the OS to use to cache would be desirable and > GB ethernet. > all depends of the type of workload. in case of mostly large file streamed big cache won't help much. in case mostly small subset of files will be used, big cache may be a benefit. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 11:52:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51C2616A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:52:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ertank@ozlerplastik.com) Received: from ozlerplastik.com (ozlerplastik.com [212.58.25.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B9BF43D46 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:52:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ertank@ozlerplastik.com) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by ozlerplastik.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85B2FA6ECB for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 13:52:10 +0200 (EET) Received: from ozlerplastik.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ozlerplastik.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 60315-08 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 13:52:08 +0200 (EET) Received: from www.ozlerplastik.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by ozlerplastik.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FC37A6EC9 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 13:52:08 +0200 (EET) From: "=?ISO-8859-9?Q?Ertan_K=FC=E7=FCko=F0lu?=" To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 13:52:08 +0200 Message-Id: <20060109113214.M18250@ozlerplastik.com> Priority: urgent X-Mailer: Open WebMail 2.51 20050228 X-OriginatingIP: 85.96.241.182 (ertank) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-9 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ozlerplastik.com Cc: Subject: Compaq ProLiant 1600 server freezes when detecting keyboard X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 11:52:14 -0000 Hello, I wanted to replace slackware 10.1 with freebsd 6.0-release. Reason is the improvements on filesystem handling in 6.0 release. My system is serving as a file server with samba. I downloaded CDs and boot to install. During device probing, system hangs at keyboard detection. Below is the output written manually: ----- atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 stray irq13 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] ===> here cursor locks, keyboard locks. ctrl+alt+del does not work <=== ----- I searched the archives. It is suggested to change BIOS setting for the OS to "Other" for single CPU systems and to "UnixWare 2.1" for SMP systems. Mine is a SMP system. I tried several other OS settings in BIOS, unfortunately nothing helped. System bios update date is 11/8/2000. I tried to install 5.4-release and cvsup and upgrade to 6.0-stable. Same problem with GENERIC kernel of yesterday sources. This system is a production machine and I have to fix it until end of this week. There is a temporary backup system running at the moment. If there is anything that I can provide, please ask for it and I'll do my best to provide. Regards, -- Ertan Küçükoðlu ertank@ozlerplastik.com Özler Plastik San. ve Tic. A.S. Tel: +90.212.676.6767 Fax: +90.212.676.8012 (webmail) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 11:55:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AF5A16A420 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:55:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E662043D60 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:54:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Evvbr-00045y-2h for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 12:54:47 +0100 Received: from c-24-147-87-49.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([24.147.87.49]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 12:54:47 +0100 Received: from jdarnold by c-24-147-87-49.hsd1.ma.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 12:54:47 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: JD Arnold Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 06:54:48 -0500 Organization: Amazing Developments Lines: 72 Message-ID: References: <43BD511F.7010403@charter.net> <43C22B59.4070709@charter.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-24-147-87-49.hsd1.ma.comcast.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) In-Reply-To: <43C22B59.4070709@charter.net> Sender: news Subject: Re: how do you install wx-config in FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 11:55:08 -0000 bob self wrote: > JD Arnold wrote: > >> bob self wrote: >> >>> I'm running FreeBSD 6.0 and have installed >>> wxgtk2-2.6.2_1 and wxgtk2-common-2.6.2. >>> >>> VLC runs fine so I know that wxwidges is installed correctly. But I >>> want to install the wxsamples >>> and compile them. I copied wxsamples manually and try to compile >>> using a script from an older >>> freebsd system but it wants wx-config and I can't find out how to get >>> that installed using the >>> ports. Which port would include that? >> >> >> wx-config is in the wxWidgets port, only it is named using the version >> of wxgtk: >> >> /usr/X11R6/bin/wxgtk2-2.6-config >> >> I guess maybe they don't want to overwrite any existing wx-config, but I >> suppose it would be nice if the port installer checked for it, and if it >> didn't exist, create it using a link. You should do that (as root): >> >> # cd /usr/X11R6/bin >> # ln wx-gtk2-2.6-config wx-config >> >> You can find out whether it got intalled by the wxgtk port by using >> pkg_info: >> >> # pkg_info -xL wxgtk | grep bin >> >> would should show where the -config and the wxrc got installed. >> >> BTW, I talk about the pkg_info option in a recent post on my blog. Thanks >> to Dru from OnLamp.com for showing me this very cool option, something >> I've >> always wondered about, as sometimes it can be very mysterious as to >> what and >> where a port might install stuff. >> > I did find setup.h in /usr/X11R6/include/wx-2.6/gtk2-ansi-release-2.6 > > I installed wxgtk2 using portupgrade but no configuration screen came up. > What is the procedure to configure wxgtk2 if you use portupgrade? I see > that my setup.h has > #define wxUSE_MEDIACTRL 0 > which is not what I want, so I need to reconfigure it but haven't been > able to find out how to do that. When you use the ports system, you can see the normal source distribution in the /usr/ports/(category)/(port)/work folder. So if you go into : /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/wxGTK26/work/wxGTK-2.6.1 you see the "normal" installation hierarchy. INSTALL.txt gives you more installation options, and reading the configure script file in there gives you even more. You'll see in configure an option called '--enable-mediactrl'. Edit the Makefile in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/wxGTK26 to add that flag to the configure run. After you do this, you'll want to go into the work folder and run make clean, then go back to the wxGTK26 folder and re-run make && make install. I think there is some way to tell the make to redo stuff because you've changed the config options, but I can never remember the variable to set. -- Jonathan Arnold (mailto:jdarnold@buddydog.org) Daemon Dancing in the Dark, a FreeBSD weblog: http://freebsd.amazingdev.com/blog/ UNIX is user-friendly. It's just a bit picky about who its friends are. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 12:28:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F306716A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 12:28:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from crispy.beef@ntlworld.com) Received: from mta08-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (mta08-winn.ispmail.ntl.com [81.103.221.48]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BBC643D49 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 12:28:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from crispy.beef@ntlworld.com) Received: from aamta09-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mta08-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20060109122825.LZCY17804.mta08-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamta09-winn.ispmail.ntl.com>; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 12:28:25 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.10] (really [82.12.81.129]) by aamta09-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20060109122825.FEZR10196.aamta09-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@[192.168.0.10]>; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 12:28:25 +0000 Message-ID: <43C256E7.2010402@ntlworld.com> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 12:28:23 +0000 From: Crispy Beef User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" References: <4ADE8A8F-858B-4092-958B-88C6DA832729@shire.net> In-Reply-To: <4ADE8A8F-858B-4092-958B-88C6DA832729@shire.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Free BSD Questions list Subject: Re: speccing an NFS server -- smp good or bad? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 12:28:28 -0000 Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: > For a FBSD (or Solaris 10) based server that is only acting as an NFS > server and nothing else, is there any advantage to using an SMP > machine? Any disadvantage? > > Does CPU speed play any great factor (ie, use a 1.8ghz opteron instead > of a 2.2ghz opteron for example)? > > I am planning for a Spring project to make an nfs server that serves to > multiple web servers / application servers using an Areca 1130 SATA > raid card. I assume lots of RAM for the OS to use to cache would be > desirable and GB ethernet. Have recently built a machine for just this purpose too, although it runs Linux, the hardware requirements will be the same. We needed a huge amount of storage on the network so went for the cheapest Opteron available (still overpowered), we put most of the cash into a decent motherboard with gigabit ethernet ports and fast PCI-X 3Ware raid cards to run the hardrives (the machine has over 3Tb of storage as it's used for video work - 16x 300Gb SATA drives). Also 1Gb of RAM. The bottlenecks on a server like this are always the network and drives, so look at those for performance. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 12:35:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E9B16A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 12:35:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bt@ccgis.de) Received: from sm7.simplethings.de (a15160313.alturo-server.de [217.160.128.151]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 815D743D49 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 12:35:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bt@ccgis.de) Received: from smm.simplethings.de ([85.88.4.201]) by sm7.simplethings.de with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EvwEz-0006hF-Ae; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 13:35:18 +0100 Received: from [212.79.172.180] (helo=center.shared) by smM.simplethings.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1EvwEz-0005tN-2I; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 13:35:13 +0100 Received: from [192.168.2.66] (helo=[192.168.2.66]) by center.shared with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EvwFq-0000Jn-93; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 13:36:06 +0100 Message-ID: <43C258B6.4050408@ccgis.de> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 13:36:06 +0100 From: Benjamin Thelen User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Jeays References: <1136493870.1989.24.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> In-Reply-To: <1136493870.1989.24.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Postgresql 8.0 again X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 12:35:21 -0000 Reboot always helped for me. Otherwise see http://www.webservertalk.com/message292349.html. Maybe this helps. Best, Ben Mike Jeays schrieb: > I just re-installed postgresql80-server from the ports, and get exactly > the same error as from the package. This is on my 5.4 machine, were I > previously had a working copy. > > I have tried changing max_connections in the sample config file (setting > it down to 1 just to see if even that would work). I also tried the > following kernel setting changes (without a reboot), with no > improvement. > > sysctl -w kern.ipc.shmall=32768 > sysctl -w kern.ipc.shmmax=134217728 > sysctl -w kern.ipc.semmap=256 > > Error message from initdb > > ... > ... > creating configuration files ... ok > creating template1 database in /usr/local/pgsql/data/base/1 ... FATAL: > could not create semaphores: No space left on device > DETAIL: Failed system call was semget(1, 17, 03600). > HINT: This error does *not* mean that you have run out of disk space. > It occurs when either the system limit for the maximum number of > semaphore sets (SEMMNI), or the system wide maximum number of semaphores > (SEMMNS), would be exceeded. You need to raise the respective kernel > parameter. Alternatively, reduce PostgreSQL's consumption of semaphores > by reducing its max_connections parameter (currently 10). > The PostgreSQL documentation contains more information about > configuring your system for PostgreSQL. > child process exited with exit code 1 > initdb: removing data directory "/usr/local/pgsql/data" > > Any more help will be very welcome! > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 12:48:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D074116A424 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 12:48:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@digitalbluesky.net) Received: from harmony.digitalbluesky.net (dsl093-010-046.cle1.dsl.speakeasy.net [66.93.10.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 35F3143D46 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 12:48:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from steve@digitalbluesky.net) Received: (qmail 8026 invoked by uid 89); 9 Jan 2006 12:49:01 -0000 Message-ID: <20060109124901.8025.qmail@harmony.digitalbluesky.net> References: <20060109120044.37F2916A41F@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20060109120044.37F2916A41F@hub.freebsd.org> From: "steve" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 07:49:01 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Extremely slow authentication via SSH on FreeBSD 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 12:48:21 -0000 > 2. Re: Extremely slow authentication via SSH on FreeBSD 6.0 > (Ashley Moran) > Message: 2 > Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 10:36:14 +0000 > From: Ashley Moran > Subject: Re: Extremely slow authentication via SSH on FreeBSD 6.0 > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <200601091036.14827.work@ashleymoran.me.uk> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" > > On Monday 09 January 2006 08:18, Garrett Cooper wrote: >> I should be more specific. Setting UseDNS to no did the trick. >> Maybe sshd was confused by my hostname setup in /etc/hosts, but I'm not >> going to speculate there. All that I know is that it works like it used to >> =). >> -Garrett > > > I've had this problem before. You can keep DNS turned on if /etc/resolv.conf > contains reachable nameservers. The DNS lookup timeout in sshd is very long > > Ashley I posted a similiar problem on Sunday but didn't get any responses. I turned off DNS in the sshd_config file and the sshd time out problem went away for me as well. Actually I had to turn off dns lookup up for apache and proftpd as well because those services were running extremely slow or not responding. If you've not made any modifications to your system, why would this happen? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 12:52:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D82116A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 12:52:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jas@math.jussieu.fr) Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71EE243D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 12:52:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jas@math.jussieu.fr) Received: from riemann.math.jussieu.fr (riemann.math.jussieu.fr [134.157.13.3]) by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.13.5/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id k09CqVhu093772 ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 13:52:31 +0100 (CET) X-Ids: 168 Received: from grobner2.math.jussieu.fr (grobner2.math.jussieu.fr [134.157.13.119]) by riemann.math.jussieu.fr (8.12.10/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id k09CqTFk081838 ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 13:52:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from grobner2.math.jussieu.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by grobner2.math.jussieu.fr (8.13.1/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id k09CqSuC015305 ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 13:52:28 +0100 Received: (from jas@localhost) by grobner2.math.jussieu.fr (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id k09CqSiK015304; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 13:52:28 +0100 Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 13:52:28 +0100 From: Albert Shih To: Ted Mittelstaedt Message-ID: <20060109125228.GG24383@math.jussieu.fr> References: <20060106161324.GS24383@math.jussieu.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Spam-Score: -1.44 () ALL_TRUSTED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.54 on 134.157.13.3 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.7.2 (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.168]); Mon, 09 Jan 2006 13:52:31 +0100 (CET) X-Antivirus: scanned by sophie at shiva.jussieu.fr X-Miltered: at shiva.jussieu.fr with ID 43C25C8F.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! Cc: shih@math.jussieu.fr, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD on DL145G2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: shih@math.jussieu.fr List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 12:52:34 -0000 Le 07/01/2006 à 20:36:48-0800, Ted Mittelstaedt a écrit > > Since these are new you need to return them to HP and exchange for > a different server, or get your money back. Good answer...... It's the f@!(*)# builder to forget put a scsi-terminator..... Lots of thanks... -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. 7 ième étage, plateau D, bureau 10 Heure local/Local time: Mon Jan 9 13:51:35 CET 2006 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 13:21:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DF1D16A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 13:21:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thelen@ccgis.de) Received: from sm7.simplethings.de (a15160313.alturo-server.de [217.160.128.151]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B080F43D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 13:21:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thelen@ccgis.de) Received: from smm.simplethings.de ([85.88.4.201]) by sm7.simplethings.de with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EvwxY-0007Pd-EP; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 14:21:21 +0100 Received: from [212.79.172.180] (helo=center.shared) by smM.simplethings.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1EvwxY-0006Ox-5K; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 14:21:16 +0100 Received: from [192.168.2.66] (helo=[192.168.2.66]) by center.shared with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EvwyP-0000Pc-AT; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 14:22:09 +0100 Message-ID: <43C26381.2040308@ccgis.de> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 14:22:09 +0100 From: Benjamin Thelen User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mike Jeays References: <1136493870.1989.24.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> In-Reply-To: <1136493870.1989.24.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Postgresql 8.0 again X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 13:21:23 -0000 At first I did't find ipc_check.pl. You'll need the postgresql source tree: contrib/ipc_check/ipc_check.pl. I also found ipcclean what may do the same like a reboot does... and ipcs gives some status information. Best, Ben Mike Jeays schrieb: > I just re-installed postgresql80-server from the ports, and get exactly > the same error as from the package. This is on my 5.4 machine, were I > previously had a working copy. > > I have tried changing max_connections in the sample config file (setting > it down to 1 just to see if even that would work). I also tried the > following kernel setting changes (without a reboot), with no > improvement. > > sysctl -w kern.ipc.shmall=32768 > sysctl -w kern.ipc.shmmax=134217728 > sysctl -w kern.ipc.semmap=256 > > Error message from initdb > > ... > ... > creating configuration files ... ok > creating template1 database in /usr/local/pgsql/data/base/1 ... FATAL: > could not create semaphores: No space left on device > DETAIL: Failed system call was semget(1, 17, 03600). > HINT: This error does *not* mean that you have run out of disk space. > It occurs when either the system limit for the maximum number of > semaphore sets (SEMMNI), or the system wide maximum number of semaphores > (SEMMNS), would be exceeded. You need to raise the respective kernel > parameter. Alternatively, reduce PostgreSQL's consumption of semaphores > by reducing its max_connections parameter (currently 10). > The PostgreSQL documentation contains more information about > configuring your system for PostgreSQL. > child process exited with exit code 1 > initdb: removing data directory "/usr/local/pgsql/data" > > Any more help will be very welcome! > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 14:02:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D7A16A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:02:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A891F43D49 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:02:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 92457 invoked by uid 60001); 9 Jan 2006 14:02:54 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=yQVHX5+SPhGqeRpeer+ClvSOfqcqq8EUTitdbVmfe6KLG2vHj+BlmtwugVoNEomI99cGlO57OL1rb59MgtMeeSZulfDAJk1FAukCfDYs0kqCXgqsHObt6CV3gB+AaXzVmDHjJd/m4igMX06+TMNND9iWhaFDFhqyRJu0FUc483s= ; Message-ID: <20060109140254.92455.qmail@web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 06:02:54 PST Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 06:02:54 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: Vladimir Tsvetkov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <666bdb140601081330m3b394a02v@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: Which is the best open source C/C++ IDE out there? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 14:02:55 -0000 --- Vladimir Tsvetkov wrote: > > This is obviously a trick question, because > real > > programmers don't use IDEs. Case Closed. > > I'm not a real programmer, but UNIX is a great > developer environment. > It's a tool based environment. > Small tools, strong cohesion in what they are > designed for, easy ways > to combine them to form more complex tasks. > Good documentation too. > Actually you don't need anything else, you > don't need a colourfull IDE. But... > Maybe only few, really exceptional people can > benefit and grok the > power of this kind of environments. > To me the ideal "IDE" is actually a toolkit: > - Source Editor, preferably with a object > browser or other kind of a > source browser. An autocomplete functionallity > could increase > productivity too - this could increase quality > if we measure quality > of code by the low number of syntax mistakes, > but this could also be a > threat to quality letting the programmer write > without reading > carefully what is written - code bloating. > - Compiler with a debugger. We must discuss > about the pros. and cons. > of a grafic debugger versus a text-mode > debugger. The things are > getting really messy when it comes up to > debugging multithreading code > and I really don't know what is the ultimate > tool for this task. > - A build tool. Ant or make will suffice. > - Source control tools. CVS, SVN etc. > - Documentation tools. POD, Doxygen, Javadoc or > something else. > - Unit testing framework. This is not always a > tool. This could be a > language extension, or a testing API. > - Other tools. > > You don't need to put everything together in a > single swissknife-tool, > but this could be convenient in some cases. > > IDE vs. Toolbased Environments ??? > > Which is more productive and how to measure > productiveness? > > Best Regards, > Vladimir Tsvetkov Tools, schmools. vi and cc work for me. I do admit that I wish someone would get make to accept spaces instead of the (damn) tab. I think its time for that :) DT __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 14:04:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFCFC16A420 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:04:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jamesoff@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E6DF43D69 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:04:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jamesoff@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 9so136551nzo for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 06:04:48 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=gnHYCvKYpzx7bSQIIql5hS3Hkt6l3BpPpteKecen3mI9flRkA4F7wp/H61niljI1DCnfoyjJlJ8D/VgCWPT4KzBYxw0J/lAqS6frgGBVYWchLyJvGc40dGbCHUBtWLcoKxxGeUrMuvYuhoBu1k/3Tc3765BlTfn5ZhRyYDLIzYM= Received: by 10.36.86.11 with SMTP id j11mr12750106nzb; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 06:04:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.109.11 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 06:04:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <720051dc0601090604p638f6772g535f68c1574e3f1c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:04:48 +0000 From: James Seward To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: 6-STABLE/amd64 recent kernel can't see any ata disks X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 14:04:54 -0000 Hello list :) I am having some issues with recent kernels since about the 6th Nov. All kernels I have build since then have failed to boot, stopped at the point they should mount root, and offering me a "mountroot>" prompt to give the root device. Entering "?" at this prompt returns something along the lines of: List of GEOM-managed devices: /dev/fd0 (The exact wording escapes me as I'm writing this at work and the machine is at home.) At this point, the HD LED on the computer and the floppy drive's LED are stuck on. I have tried several builds at various intervals since this problem first showed up, including a complete fresh cvsup of /usr/src and building GENERIC. (My custom kernel config did not change before the problem surfaced.) Unfortunately because of scroll I cannot see if the ata controllers are detected during boot - but I am going to attempt to get a serial cable onto the machine and grab the boot messages that way tonight. The uname output for the working kernel is: FreeBSD ... 6.0-STABLE FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE #6: Sun Nov 6 13:10:48 GMT 2005 root@...:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/MYCONF amd64 The motherboard is an Asus A8V-Deluxe and I have both SATA and PATA disks attached to it - all of which work fine on the old kernel, and also in Windows XP (which dual boots on that machine). dmesg from a successful start: http://sakaki.jamesoff.net/~james/dmesg-working.txt pciconf -lv: http://sakaki.jamesoff.net/~james/pciconf.txt Hopefully I can update this later with the dmesg from a newer kernel failing to start. Any and all suggestions gratefully received :) Cheers, James From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 14:27:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82A0716A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:27:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kl@os.lv) Received: from balodis.pvd.gov.lv (balodis.pvd.gov.lv [159.148.155.109]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0844C43D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:26:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kl@os.lv) Received: from balodis.pvd.gov.lv (mail [192.168.2.10]) by balodis.pvd.gov.lv (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B5208508B0 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 16:24:46 +0200 (EET) Received: by balodis.pvd.gov.lv (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 022E18508C2; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 16:24:45 +0200 (EET) Received: from [192.168.1.21] (sr [159.148.155.3]) by balodis.pvd.gov.lv (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BD2B8508C0 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 16:24:42 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <43C272F0.40208@os.lv> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 16:28:00 +0200 From: Casper User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.0 (2004-09-13) on mail X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=failed version=3.0.0 X-AV-Checked: SMTP-scan Subject: Virtual network device for jail... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 14:27:01 -0000 Hi, Can somebody maybe suggest me how to make some virtual network device for jail ip aliases? How I understand if I have one network card, I can`t use nat, etc... thnx, Casper From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 14:33:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 496CE16A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:33:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6BDD43D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:33:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2) with ESMTP id k09EXPiU010064; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 09:33:25 -0500 (EST) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2/Submit) id k09EXOGm010063; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 09:33:24 -0500 (EST) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200601091433.k09EXOGm010063@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: home_post01@yahoo.co.jp (n-n) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 09:33:24 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20060109060125.9191.qmail@web3310.mail.bbt.yahoo.co.jp> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL7] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 14:33:27 -0000 > > It is hoped that FreeBSD becomes a system like HP-UX. Huh?!!! It is hoped not. We don't need yet another proprietary, non-open UNIX. Probably the poster doesn't understand what FreeBSD is. ////jerry > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 14:42:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8103C16A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:42:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33310.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33310.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.125]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 07A1743D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:42:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 93252 invoked by uid 60001); 9 Jan 2006 14:42:42 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ZpcsBDP+JHxYK0ZIfxUm1S56M6eoGzf9R4teTXdoIlcmTYiDffuFsEz40eL23JgN7Aif/gNmXN/k2LeESwCYwVXcDiIpjFTtDBWjsq4OLig4n7QWMUTa8yZWjKwXCrpqFEn/EjuHSy6r9BiPXrx+fhdFNeVS9M6RUE6uikRPBo8= ; Message-ID: <20060109144242.93250.qmail@web33310.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33310.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 06:42:42 PST Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 06:42:42 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: Wojciech Puchar , "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" In-Reply-To: <20060109122752.D12901@chylonia.3miasto.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Free BSD Questions list Subject: Re: speccing an NFS server -- smp good or bad? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 14:42:43 -0000 --- Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > For a FBSD (or Solaris 10) based server that > is only acting as an NFS server > > and nothing else, is there any advantage to > using an SMP machine? Any > > no. one CPU is powerful enough. pentium 200 > class machine does have no > problems working as NFS server for 100Mbit/s > LAN at full speed, assuming > disk is able to cope with. > > > disadvantage? > > > > Does CPU speed play any great factor (ie, use > a 1.8ghz opteron instead of a > > 2.2ghz opteron for example)? > > no. with slowest available AMD64 CPU it will > still be much overpowered. > consider using that machine for other tasks > too. > > but you will need motherboard with something > better than 33Mhz 32-bit PCI > and lots of ATA/SATA ports, or extra > controllers plugged if you like this > server to really be able to do 1000Mbit/s > speed. > > > card. I assume lots of RAM for the OS to use > to cache would be desirable and > > GB ethernet. > > > all depends of the type of workload. in case of > mostly large file streamed > big cache won't help much. in case mostly small > subset of files will be > used, big cache may be a benefit. I agree and disagree :) As for CPU speed (where you can assume linear performance benefits as GHZ increase), "Faster" is always better, although not "necessary". With a faster cpu and faster ethernet card your responses will be faster. Every millisecond counts. Faster machines react faster to requests and faster machines can fill a wire more effectively. It won't be overloaded with a slow processor, but it will be snappier with a faster processor. Your premise that 2 processors are faster than 1 is faulty, since FreeBSD sucks at SMP. So avoid SMP because your performance may even be worse than with 1 processor. I haven't tested 7.0 yet but its becoming the story of the OS that cried "WOLF"; they may get it someday but I'm getting tired of believing them. "GB ethernet" is meaningless, since gigabit controllers and 100Mb/s controllers (these days) are the same. Many on-board "gigabit" interfaces are only on 32bit/33Mhz busses. You want a 64-bit/133Mhz card that has a good driver in FreeBSD. All cards are different. Intels are good. Some others may be good also. DT __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 14:45:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1CD316A420 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:45:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1C7943D5E for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:45:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2) with ESMTP id k09EcMiU010083; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 09:38:22 -0500 (EST) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2/Submit) id k09EcMt1010082; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 09:38:22 -0500 (EST) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200601091438.k09EcMt1010082@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: imran@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk (Imran Imtiaz) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 09:38:21 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <200601071016.k07AGXMc002387@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL7] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd.org email X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 14:45:56 -0000 > > > Can I get an email address on @freebsd.org ? If you become a committer - see information on the FreeBSD website about being a committer. ////jerry > > Regards, > Imran Imtiaz > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 14:58:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 114D316A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:58:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zimmermanjj@alltel.net) Received: from ispmxmta09-srv.alltel.net (ispmxmta09-srv.alltel.net [166.102.165.170]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A79243D4C for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:58:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from zimmermanjj@alltel.net) Received: from [166.102.165.30] (really [10.135.32.162]) by ispmxmta09-srv.alltel.net with SMTP id <20060109145820.WGSH12342.ispmxmta09-srv.alltel.net@[166.102.165.30]> for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 08:58:20 -0600 X-Mailer: Openwave WebEngine, version 2.8.19 (webedge20-101-1110-20050615) From: To: Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 9:58:20 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20060109145820.WGSH12342.ispmxmta09-srv.alltel.net@[166.102.165.30]> Cc: Subject: "Support for 80386 processors (the I386_CPU kernel configuration option)" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 14:58:22 -0000 Hello. I quoted the subject of the email directly from the kernel changes section of the FreeBSD/i386-RELEASE release notes. I am not sure if I am reading this correctly, but does this mean that people who have Intel-based processors (such as P4 and Celeron) should not use 6.0 and only use 5.4? I want to intsall FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE on a Celeron and a P4, and to the best of my knowledge they are i386 processors (80386). If someone could clear this up I would appreciate it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 15:13:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 993B616A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 15:13:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEE3943D46 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 15:13:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) by kane.otenet.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-8) with SMTP id k09FCwXQ009255; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 17:12:58 +0200 Received: by flame.pc (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D204911857; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 17:11:32 +0200 (EET) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 17:11:32 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: zimmermanjj@alltel.net Message-ID: <20060109151132.GA27197@flame.pc> References: <20060109145820.WGSH12342.ispmxmta09-srv.alltel.net@[166.102.165.30]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060109145820.WGSH12342.ispmxmta09-srv.alltel.net@[166.102.165.30]> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: "Support for 80386 processors (the I386_CPU kernel configuration option)" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 15:13:03 -0000 On 2006-01-09 09:58, zimmermanjj@alltel.net wrote: > Hello. I quoted the subject of the email directly from the kernel > changes section of the FreeBSD/i386-RELEASE release notes. I am not > sure if I am reading this correctly, but does this mean that people > who have Intel-based processors (such as P4 and Celeron) should not > use 6.0 and only use 5.4? Of course, not! It means that 486 and latter processors are supported. > I want to intsall FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE on a Celeron and a P4, and to > the best of my knowledge they are i386 processors (80386). You are referring to a "processor family". The release notes refer to a particular CPU/processor type. I'm running 7.0-CURRENT on a Celeron system at home. You shouldn't have problems running any version on your CPU, from 4.X, to 5.4 or 5-STABLE, or evel 6.X. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 15:15:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EEA916A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 15:15:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ertr1013@student.uu.se) Received: from pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net [81.228.8.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D48F543D48 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 15:15:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ertr1013@student.uu.se) Received: from falcon.midgard.homeip.net (83.253.29.241) by pne-smtpout2-sn2.hy.skanova.net (7.2.069.1) id 43C2444B000176C1 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 16:15:33 +0100 Received: (qmail 71211 invoked by uid 1001); 9 Jan 2006 16:15:32 +0100 Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 16:15:32 +0100 From: Erik Trulsson To: zimmermanjj@alltel.net Message-ID: <20060109151532.GA71158@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> Mail-Followup-To: zimmermanjj@alltel.net, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org References: <20060109145820.WGSH12342.ispmxmta09-srv.alltel.net@[166.102.165.30]> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060109145820.WGSH12342.ispmxmta09-srv.alltel.net@[166.102.165.30]> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: "Support for 80386 processors (the I386_CPU kernel configuration option)" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 15:15:35 -0000 On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 09:58:20AM -0500, zimmermanjj@alltel.net wrote: > Hello. I quoted the subject of the email directly from the kernel changes > section of the FreeBSD/i386-RELEASE release notes. I am not sure if I am > reading this correctly, but does this mean that people who have > Intel-based processors (such as P4 and Celeron) should not use 6.0 and > only use 5.4? I want to intsall FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE on a Celeron and a > P4, and to the best of my knowledge they are i386 processors (80386). If > someone could clear this up I would appreciate it. No, P4 and Celeron are not 80386 processors. They are descended from the 80386 and belong to the i386 *family* of processors, which is a slightly different thing. What has been removed from 6.0 is the ability to run on an *actual* 80386 CPU. They were state of the art in the late 80's, but that is a while ago. If your computer has a clock frequency of 50 MHz or more, it is almost certainly not using a real 80386. (If I remember correctly they were only available in speeds ranging from 16 MHz to 40 MHz.) FreeBSD 6.0 should run fine on any Intel CPU from the original Pentium and onwards. (Also on an 80486, if it has an hardware FPU - either built in or external.) -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 15:21:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3426416A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 15:21:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from davidernest@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3EDC43D4C for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 15:21:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from davidernest@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i20so3566717wra for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 07:21:23 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=tA5y8pD+ASqUMXV7c6biJ0jhpfVX4GDb7KZJnjuGlUUOgn1QJKrv2UFj2mPE+Cki+AgHZnJAbSAiHgJMoqYaMj4x/ldypyOICQN1H0UVgIsGRbEs7AyOLYKe8Yg8rEK0VK9AKLi0VOntDaiAiIHAvvFR2dBk6ADki17urLAYBk8= Received: by 10.54.113.6 with SMTP id l6mr8273338wrc; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 07:21:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.141.14 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 07:21:21 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6db0aaaa0601090721w5951cf1fs113d9125877a588d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 10:21:21 -0500 From: David Banning To: Robert Slade In-Reply-To: <1136618623.15229.17.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <6db0aaaa0601062145k392b935che0d33e4f2739279e@mail.gmail.com> <1136618623.15229.17.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spamcop listed - need help to diagnose why X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 15:21:24 -0000 Thanks for the response, Robert. I know tmda and such services anger some people. I also find other people who ask me how they can get such a service, only because spam is so difficult to block. I guess it depends on how important email is to you. I would never ask a question on this board and expect people to confirm, but in business I find it helpful. I compare it to the benefit vs hassle of voice mail; some who must leave messages hate it, but I find both voice mail and tmda services actuals stops certain types of calls or email that I do not -want-. On the problem at hand, I used tcpdump to watch the traffic on my line and noticed one of my windows boxes was sending it - a virus as it turned out. All is well - From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 15:27:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4537616A420 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 15:27:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44B2143D48 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 15:27:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Evyum-0006cu-3w for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 16:26:32 +0100 Received: from c-24-147-87-49.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([24.147.87.49]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 16:26:32 +0100 Received: from jdarnold by c-24-147-87-49.hsd1.ma.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 16:26:32 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: JD Arnold Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 10:25:24 -0500 Organization: Amazing Developments Lines: 76 Message-ID: References: <666bdb140601081330m3b394a02v@mail.gmail.com> <20060109140254.92455.qmail@web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-24-147-87-49.hsd1.ma.comcast.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) In-Reply-To: <20060109140254.92455.qmail@web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Sender: news Subject: Re: Which is the best open source C/C++ IDE out there? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 15:27:33 -0000 Danial Thom wrote: > > --- Vladimir Tsvetkov wrote: > >>> This is obviously a trick question, because >> real >>> programmers don't use IDEs. Case Closed. >> I'm not a real programmer, but UNIX is a great >> developer environment. >> It's a tool based environment. >> Small tools, strong cohesion in what they are >> designed for, easy ways >> to combine them to form more complex tasks. >> Good documentation too. >> Actually you don't need anything else, you >> don't need a colourfull IDE. But... >> Maybe only few, really exceptional people can >> benefit and grok the >> power of this kind of environments. >> To me the ideal "IDE" is actually a toolkit: >> - Source Editor, preferably with a object >> browser or other kind of a >> source browser. An autocomplete functionallity >> could increase >> productivity too - this could increase quality >> if we measure quality >> of code by the low number of syntax mistakes, >> but this could also be a >> threat to quality letting the programmer write >> without reading >> carefully what is written - code bloating. >> - Compiler with a debugger. We must discuss >> about the pros. and cons. >> of a grafic debugger versus a text-mode >> debugger. The things are >> getting really messy when it comes up to >> debugging multithreading code >> and I really don't know what is the ultimate >> tool for this task. >> - A build tool. Ant or make will suffice. >> - Source control tools. CVS, SVN etc. >> - Documentation tools. POD, Doxygen, Javadoc or >> something else. >> - Unit testing framework. This is not always a >> tool. This could be a >> language extension, or a testing API. >> - Other tools. >> >> You don't need to put everything together in a >> single swissknife-tool, >> but this could be convenient in some cases. >> >> IDE vs. Toolbased Environments ??? >> >> Which is more productive and how to measure >> productiveness? >> >> Best Regards, >> Vladimir Tsvetkov > > Tools, schmools. vi and cc work for me. > > I do admit that I wish someone would get make to > accept spaces instead of the (damn) tab. I think > its time for that :) That's why you should graduate to Emacs - with the makefile syntax highlighting, you'll at least see the differences between tabs and spaces before getting into trouble due to bad whitespacing!-) -- Jonathan Arnold (mailto:jdarnold@buddydog.org) Daemon Dancing in the Dark, a FreeBSD weblog: http://freebsd.amazingdev.com/blog/ UNIX is user-friendly. It's just a bit picky about who its friends are. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 15:51:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B15F016A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 15:51:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jdow@earthlink.net) Received: from smtpauth01.mail.atl.earthlink.net (smtpauth01.mail.atl.earthlink.net [209.86.89.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A58943D5D for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 15:51:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jdow@earthlink.net) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=WrzXtTgORyZ5j2OR3x2T2a7KYbUvcWDX0dzm0TPz07M5Nc++8SxRPAWT+/TLqEeA; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:Cc:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [71.116.149.244] (helo=kittycat) by smtpauth01.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EvzIu-0006B7-6r; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 10:51:28 -0500 Message-ID: <037101c61534$91426c90$1225a8c0@kittycat> From: "jdow" To: "David Banning" References: <6db0aaaa0601062145k392b935che0d33e4f2739279e@mail.gmail.com><1136618623.15229.17.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> <6db0aaaa0601090721w5951cf1fs113d9125877a588d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 07:51:33 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 X-ELNK-Trace: bb89ecdb26a8f9f24d2b10475b571120d946e384bfc0e9a431fe3b81d3c0206b660b582bd1b8aac6350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 71.116.149.244 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spamcop listed - need help to diagnose why X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 15:51:32 -0000 From: "David Banning" > Thanks for the response, Robert. I know tmda and such services anger > some people. I also find other people who ask me how they can get > such a service, only because spam is so difficult to block. I guess it > depends on how important email is to you. I would never ask a question > on this board and expect people to confirm, but in business I find it > helpful. I compare it to the benefit vs hassle of voice mail; some who > must leave messages hate it, but I find both voice mail and tmda > services actuals stops certain types of calls or email that I do not > -want-. I simply place tmda challenge addresses into my /dev/null list and never see the problem again. I treat it like spam. And I consider it to be spam. So "pfft" I make it gone. {^_^} Joanne From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 16:04:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA9FD16A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 16:04:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6302F43D46 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 16:04:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2) with ESMTP id k09G3xiU010367; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:03:59 -0500 (EST) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2/Submit) id k09G3xIS010366; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:03:59 -0500 (EST) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200601091603.k09G3xIS010366@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: zimmermanjj@alltel.net Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 11:03:59 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20060109145820.WGSH12342.ispmxmta09-srv.alltel.net@[166.102.165.30]> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL7] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "Support for 80386 processors (the I386_CPU kernel configuration X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 16:04:01 -0000 > Please break your lines at around 70 characters. It makes it much easier for people with text based Email readers to read and respond to your posts. > Hello. I quoted the subject of the email directly from the kernel > changes section of the FreeBSD/i386-RELEASE release notes. I am not > sure if I am reading this correctly, but does this mean that people > who have Intel-based processors (such as P4 and Celeron) should not > use 6.0 and only use 5.4? I want to intsall FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE > on a Celeron and a P4, and to the best of my knowledge they > are i386 processors (80386). If someone could clear this up I > would appreciate it. No. You should use 6.0. i386 is just a generic name for the whole class of processors that have followed Intel's i386 line, starting with the 80386 and everything afterward. P4, P5, P6 and etc all are part of this line. ////jerry > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 16:14:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F33E16A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 16:14:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33304.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33304.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.119]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 95EDE43D46 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 16:14:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 21653 invoked by uid 60001); 9 Jan 2006 16:14:09 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Pl0RUqjo/lkPw0Z7fZd0VMlhn9sdy4h0ZEzXms/nSSRIRVuszSYH3h0o7sUsFeTehJKi32v8kHWZsIG2zhxjZ3o9Y0/YPfLmmQUjMwv0sACk07Wg5LGgQSv6PH/2SLJD3coXUX48AkhlSf7tfFc7lR6anQb2bhInZ9HZhMCl+P8= ; Message-ID: <20060109161408.21651.qmail@web33304.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33304.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 08:14:08 PST Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 08:14:08 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: jdow , David Banning In-Reply-To: <037101c61534$91426c90$1225a8c0@kittycat> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spamcop listed - need help to diagnose why X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 16:14:12 -0000 --- jdow wrote: > From: "David Banning" > > > Thanks for the response, Robert. I know tmda > and such services anger > > some people. I also find other people who > ask me how they can get > > such a service, only because spam is so > difficult to block. I guess it > > depends on how important email is to you. I > would never ask a question > > on this board and expect people to confirm, > but in business I find it > > helpful. I compare it to the benefit vs > hassle of voice mail; some who > > must leave messages hate it, but I find both > voice mail and tmda > > services actuals stops certain types of calls > or email that I do not > > -want-. > > I simply place tmda challenge addresses into my > /dev/null list and never > see the problem again. I treat it like spam. > And I consider it to be > spam. So "pfft" I make it gone. > > {^_^} Joanne I'm of the opposite thinking. I'd rather sort through a bunch of spam everyday rather than miss 1 important message. If I miss 1 inquiry it could cost me 1000s of dollars. Spam is an annoyance, nothing more. There is no sense cutting off your nose to spite your face. People with challenge systems crack me up. They wonder why they don't get their receipts when they order things, or why they miss important automated correspondence about their orders. DT __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 16:48:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A220616A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 16:48:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jdow@earthlink.net) Received: from smtpauth01.mail.atl.earthlink.net (smtpauth01.mail.atl.earthlink.net [209.86.89.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ACAB43D4C for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 16:48:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jdow@earthlink.net) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=Xqjyub6DPOfVXvAYpYPlDwRirddrwTZHn6zijZEHVACZuWhkZUysXdtI1G6uGwFk; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:Cc:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [71.116.149.244] (helo=kittycat) by smtpauth01.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Ew0Bj-0006Qt-2W; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 11:48:07 -0500 Message-ID: <038301c6153c$7bb246e0$1225a8c0@kittycat> From: "jdow" To: , "David Banning" References: <20060109161408.21651.qmail@web33304.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 08:48:13 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 X-ELNK-Trace: bb89ecdb26a8f9f24d2b10475b571120d946e384bfc0e9a43de2b16ecb8ad7d01090e56e9cc72b3a350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 71.116.149.244 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spamcop listed - need help to diagnose why X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 16:48:15 -0000 From: "Danial Thom" > --- jdow wrote: > >> From: "David Banning" >> >> > Thanks for the response, Robert. I know tmda >> and such services anger >> > some people. I also find other people who >> ask me how they can get >> > such a service, only because spam is so >> difficult to block. I guess it >> > depends on how important email is to you. I >> would never ask a question >> > on this board and expect people to confirm, >> but in business I find it >> > helpful. I compare it to the benefit vs >> hassle of voice mail; some who >> > must leave messages hate it, but I find both >> voice mail and tmda >> > services actuals stops certain types of calls >> or email that I do not >> > -want-. >> >> I simply place tmda challenge addresses into my >> /dev/null list and never >> see the problem again. I treat it like spam. >> And I consider it to be >> spam. So "pfft" I make it gone. >> >> {^_^} Joanne > > I'm of the opposite thinking. I'd rather sort > through a bunch of spam everyday rather than miss > 1 important message. If I miss 1 inquiry it could > cost me 1000s of dollars. Spam is an annoyance, > nothing more. There is no sense cutting off your > nose to spite your face. > > People with challenge systems crack me up. They > wonder why they don't get their receipts when > they order things, or why they miss important > automated correspondence about their orders. Spam I sort through. With SpamAssassin scoring it's easy to find the low scores and concentrate on them. But somebody arrogant enough to spam me with a challenge for a message to a mailing list ends up on my procmail /dev/null rules. (I use fetchmail to grab mail and procmail to feed it to /var/spool/mail/ with stops along the way for SpamAssassin, ClamAv, and some random cleverness.) {^_^} Challenges are as bad as the spam they try to prevent. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 17:06:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 321D316A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 17:06:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ml@t-b-o-h.net) Received: from vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com [204.107.90.128]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AAEB43D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 17:06:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ml@t-b-o-h.net) Received: (from tbohml@localhost) by vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id k09H6KQL064857 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 12:06:20 -0500 (EST) From: Tuc at T-B-O-H Message-Id: <200601091706.k09H6KQL064857@vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 12:06:20 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Ports/Package dilema X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 17:06:23 -0000 Hi, (FBSD 5.4-RELEASE) I'm trying to install CVSUP on a machine with VERY LIMITED disk space. Trying to build it out of ports won't happen, ezm3 is just TOO TOO big. So I decided to try to install it as a package. Now I get : /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libm.so.4" not found, required by "m3build" Any idea what to do now? Thanks, Tuc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 17:07:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FEAC16A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 17:07:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kl@os.lv) Received: from balodis.pvd.gov.lv (balodis.pvd.gov.lv [159.148.155.109]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F01143D67 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 17:07:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kl@os.lv) Received: from balodis.pvd.gov.lv (mail [192.168.2.10]) by balodis.pvd.gov.lv (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A8478508B0 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 19:05:14 +0200 (EET) Received: by balodis.pvd.gov.lv (Postfix, from userid 65534) id 6F8848508C2; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 19:05:14 +0200 (EET) Received: from [192.168.1.21] (sr [159.148.155.3]) by balodis.pvd.gov.lv (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB5988508B0 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 19:05:10 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <43C2988D.1050202@os.lv> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 19:08:29 +0200 From: Casper User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7-1.1.fc4 (X11/20050929) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <43C272F0.40208@os.lv> In-Reply-To: <43C272F0.40208@os.lv> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.0 (2004-09-13) on mail X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=failed version=3.0.0 X-AV-Checked: SMTP-scan Subject: Re: Virtual network device for jail... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 17:07:34 -0000 I tryed to put in rc.conf: cloned_interfaces="lo1" I think that is something that I wanted, only can somebody point me to some manual about that, what realy is cloned and how to do it manualy at cli. tnx, Casper Casper wrote: > > Hi, > > Can somebody maybe suggest me how to make some virtual network device > for jail ip aliases? How I understand if I have one network card, I > can`t use nat, etc... > > thnx, > > Casper > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 17:13:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F67B16A435 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 17:13:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACD8743D46 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 17:13:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k09H3QOM059214 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 10:03:26 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) with ESMTP id k09H0u5v059209; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 10:03:26 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 10:00:56 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: wbs@infowest.com In-Reply-To: <43c1f6f9.38e.457f.1542641428@infowest.com> Message-ID: <20060109100043.L59167@wonkity.com> References: <43c1f6f9.38e.457f.1542641428@infowest.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 09 Jan 2006 10:03:26 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: notebook keyboard configuration under Xorg X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 17:13:36 -0000 On Sun, 8 Jan 2006, wbs@infowest.com wrote: > When I type - either in generic X oor Gnome - I sometimes > get duplicate letters showing up. I haven't a clue where to > turrn. My notebook is a Toshiba Satelite Pro 6100. This may help: http://www.rfc1149.net/freebsd-portege-4010.html.en#xf86config -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 17:14:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43E9116A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 17:14:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7886D43D46 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 17:14:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) by kane.otenet.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-8) with SMTP id k09HEhaL025081; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 19:14:44 +0200 Received: by flame.pc (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7E0CF11854; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 19:13:17 +0200 (EET) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 19:13:17 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Tuc at T-B-O-H Message-ID: <20060109171316.GB28017@flame.pc> References: <200601091706.k09H6KQL064857@vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200601091706.k09H6KQL064857@vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports/Package dilema X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 17:14:46 -0000 On 2006-01-09 12:06, Tuc at T-B-O-H wrote: > Hi, (FBSD 5.4-RELEASE) > > I'm trying to install CVSUP on a machine with VERY LIMITED disk > space. Trying to build it out of ports won't happen, ezm3 is just TOO > TOO big. So I decided to try to install it as a package. Now I get : > > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libm.so.4" not found, required by "m3build" You can solve this by installing the pre-built packages for compatibility libraries: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/packages/misc/compat4x-i386-5.3_4.tbz ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/packages/misc/compat5x-i386-5.4.0.8_2.tbz Then you don't have to compile anything from source. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 17:18:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5377416A423 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 17:18:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from hobbiton.shire.net (mail.freestylefund.com [166.70.252.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E2C743D4C for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 17:18:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from [67.161.222.227] (helo=[192.168.99.68]) by hobbiton.shire.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.51) id 1Ew0fI-000BsZ-2E for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 10:18:40 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) In-Reply-To: <20060109122752.D12901@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <4ADE8A8F-858B-4092-958B-88C6DA832729@shire.net> <20060109122752.D12901@chylonia.3miasto.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 10:18:39 -0700 To: Free BSD Questions list X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.161.222.227 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: chad@shire.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on hobbiton.shire.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Re: speccing an NFS server -- smp good or bad? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 17:18:42 -0000 On Jan 9, 2006, at 4:32 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >> For a FBSD (or Solaris 10) based server that is only acting as an >> NFS server and nothing else, is there any advantage to using an >> SMP machine? Any > > no. one CPU is powerful enough. pentium 200 class machine does have > no problems working as NFS server for 100Mbit/s LAN at full speed, > assuming disk is able to cope with. > >> disadvantage? >> >> Does CPU speed play any great factor (ie, use a 1.8ghz opteron >> instead of a 2.2ghz opteron for example)? > > no. with slowest available AMD64 CPU it will still be much > overpowered. consider using that machine for other tasks too. > > but you will need motherboard with something better than 33Mhz 32- > bit PCI and lots of ATA/SATA ports, or extra controllers plugged if > you like this server to really be able to do 1000Mbit/s speed. yes, PCI-X and Areca 1130 12 port SATA Raid card. I wonder how FreeBSD compares to Solaris 10 for nfs serving. "Client" servers are a mix of FreeBSD and Solaris 10. Thanks Chad > >> card. I assume lots of RAM for the OS to use to cache would be >> desirable and GB ethernet. >> > all depends of the type of workload. in case of mostly large file > streamed big cache won't help much. in case mostly small subset of > files will be used, big cache may be a benefit. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Your Web App and Email hosting provider chad at shire.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 17:22:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50D2E16A420 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 17:22:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arb46@cornell.edu) Received: from mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3A2243D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 17:22:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from arb46@cornell.edu) Received: (qmail 4243 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2006 17:22:45 -0000 Received: from dsl092-028-179.sfo4.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO localhost) (alanbram@[66.92.28.179]) (envelope-sender ) by mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 9 Jan 2006 17:22:45 -0000 Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 10:18:33 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <20060109.101833.25913767.arb46@cornell.edu> To: steve@digitalbluesky.net From: Alan Bram In-Reply-To: <20060109124901.8025.qmail@harmony.digitalbluesky.net> References: <20060109120044.37F2916A41F@hub.freebsd.org> <20060109124901.8025.qmail@harmony.digitalbluesky.net> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.4 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Extremely slow authentication via SSH on FreeBSD 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 17:22:46 -0000 Boy, talk about good timing! I just joined this list yesterday. The reason I joined was to see if I could get any help solving what appears to have been (approximately) this same problem. I also had the problem of extremely slow SSH authentication. In fact, it was so slow that at first I thought is was simply dead, because most often it would time out and give up. In my case, I had not made any changes to the system whatsoever. SSH had been working fine since I originally installed FreeBSD 5.4 a few months ago. But then a few days ago it just suddenly started having this problem. In my case, Apache did _NOT_ seem to be suffering from the same problem. I changed my sshd configuration to set UseDNS to no, and that seems to have fixed the problem. So I'm quite happy, and grateful. However, it does leave me curious ... Something must have changed in my network (a small home network on a DSL router), I guess, but I don't know what. > I posted a similiar problem on Sunday but didn't get any responses. I > turned off DNS in the sshd_config file and the sshd time out problem went > away for me as well. Actually I had to turn off dns lookup up for apache > and proftpd as well because those services were running extremely slow or > not responding. > > If you've not made any modifications to your system, why would this happen? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 17:40:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E6A216A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 17:40:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ml@t-b-o-h.net) Received: from vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com [204.107.90.128]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38B8143D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 17:40:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ml@t-b-o-h.net) Received: (from tbohml@localhost) by vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id k09Heg73066048; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 12:40:42 -0500 (EST) From: Tuc at T-B-O-H Message-Id: <200601091740.k09Heg73066048@vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> To: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr (Giorgos Keramidas) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 12:40:42 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20060109171316.GB28017@flame.pc> from "Giorgos Keramidas" at Jan 09, 2006 07:13:17 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Tuc at T-B-O-H , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports/Package dilema X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 17:40:46 -0000 > > On 2006-01-09 12:06, Tuc at T-B-O-H wrote: > > Hi, (FBSD 5.4-RELEASE) > > > > I'm trying to install CVSUP on a machine with VERY LIMITED disk > > space. Trying to build it out of ports won't happen, ezm3 is just TOO > > TOO big. So I decided to try to install it as a package. Now I get : > > > > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libm.so.4" not found, required by "m3build" > > You can solve this by installing the pre-built packages for > compatibility libraries: > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/packages/misc/compat4x-i386-5.3_4.tbz > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/packages/misc/compat5x-i386-5.4.0.8_2.tbz > > Then you don't have to compile anything from source. > I have compat4x installed already, but not 5x. Should I load 5x on a 5.4-REL system?? Thanks, Tuc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 17:48:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8088116A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 17:48:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout4.cac.washington.edu (mxout4.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF08243D46 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 17:48:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9]) by mxout4.cac.washington.edu (8.13.5+UW05.10/8.13.5+UW05.09) with ESMTP id k09HmBHa024150 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Mon, 9 Jan 2006 09:48:12 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [128.208.200.23] (D-128-208-200-23.dhcp4.washington.edu [128.208.200.23]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.5+UW05.10/8.13.5+UW05.09) with ESMTP id k09HmB0Z015750 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Mon, 9 Jan 2006 09:48:11 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) In-Reply-To: <20060109095713.GA3469@bifteki.lan> References: <20060109083200.26248.qmail@web54413.mail.yahoo.com> <20060109095713.GA3469@bifteki.lan> Message-Id: <3EE759CD-C148-4C79-A318-0F41D3F96235@u.washington.edu> From: Garrett Cooper Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 09:49:05 -0800 To: Leonidas Tsampros , FreeBSD Questions X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='HTML_70_90 0.1, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0' Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: SSH problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 17:48:13 -0000 On Jan 9, 2006, at 1:57 AM, Leonidas Tsampros wrote: > On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 12:32:00AM -0800, Robert Stevenson wrote: >> I'm able to log-in to my FreeBSD box using SSH just a >> few days ago, but now I can't. Whenever I try I only >> get to enter my username and the password prompt does >> not appear anymore. It seems authentication stops >> after I enter my username. I'm using PUTTY as a client >> >> I can login directly to the box and I could see that >> SSHD is running. Any ideas what's wrong with it? >> >> > > I've encountered a similar situation some time ago with a firewall i > used to run. To troobleshoot the sshd daemon, just login to your > box, shut down the sshd that's running with > > $ /etc/rc.d/sshd stop > > and then run sshd in debug mode with verbose output by running > > $ /usr/sbin/sshd -D -f /etc/ssh/sshd_config > > by running this command the daemon will run but it will not detach > itself in the background, but instead will output lots of debuging > information. > > After that try to login using putty, and take a look at the last 10-20 > lines of the login process. There should be enough information about > the nature of the error. Read my thread that I just made, Extremely slow authentication via SSH on FreeBSD 6.0. It'll probably solve your problem. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 17:56:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DB4116A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 17:56:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike.jeays@rogers.com) Received: from smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.82]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9BB1443D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 17:56:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike.jeays@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 40104 invoked from network); 9 Jan 2006 17:56:10 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:Subject:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Mime-Version:X-Mailer:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=qCmGDim9runDvu0kH1UbvKor20WHeVj0YC2N2wNOy4KSB12Dqvmd0NfpxE58K4DqqScOfUt4sbQCJj6yBbGj58H91IsWRg7SetpKOdVGqHkJr1jfibmlFC3xD/0ojtp/+mda3dGMCvvEiGOFm7lNR2nTA6AyLP173bw7FjQdSw0= ; Received: from unknown (HELO chaucer.jeays.ca) (mike.jeays@rogers.com@72.139.51.96 with plain) by smtp104.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 9 Jan 2006 17:56:10 -0000 From: Mike jeays To: Benjamin Thelen In-Reply-To: <43C258B6.4050408@ccgis.de> References: <1136493870.1989.24.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> <43C258B6.4050408@ccgis.de> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 12:56:11 -0500 Message-Id: <1136829371.5423.7.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Postgresql 8.0 again X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 17:56:15 -0000 On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 13:36 +0100, Benjamin Thelen wrote: > Reboot always helped for me. Otherwise see > http://www.webservertalk.com/message292349.html. > Maybe this helps. > > Best, > Ben > > Mike Jeays schrieb: > > I just re-installed postgresql80-server from the ports, and get exactly > > the same error as from the package. This is on my 5.4 machine, were I > > previously had a working copy. > > > > I have tried changing max_connections in the sample config file (setting > > it down to 1 just to see if even that would work). I also tried the > > following kernel setting changes (without a reboot), with no > > improvement. > > > > sysctl -w kern.ipc.shmall=32768 > > sysctl -w kern.ipc.shmmax=134217728 > > sysctl -w kern.ipc.semmap=256 > > > > Error message from initdb > > > > ... > > ... > > creating configuration files ... ok > > creating template1 database in /usr/local/pgsql/data/base/1 ... FATAL: > > could not create semaphores: No space left on device > > DETAIL: Failed system call was semget(1, 17, 03600). > > HINT: This error does *not* mean that you have run out of disk space. > > It occurs when either the system limit for the maximum number of > > semaphore sets (SEMMNI), or the system wide maximum number of semaphores > > (SEMMNS), would be exceeded. You need to raise the respective kernel > > parameter. Alternatively, reduce PostgreSQL's consumption of semaphores > > by reducing its max_connections parameter (currently 10). > > The PostgreSQL documentation contains more information about > > configuring your system for PostgreSQL. > > child process exited with exit code 1 > > initdb: removing data directory "/usr/local/pgsql/data" > > > > Any more help will be very welcome! > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I got it to work with a kernel recompile with some additional parameters. It is there in the documentation if you read it carefully! (I obviously didn't). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 18:08:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E52FA16A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 18:08:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from rosebud.otenet.gr (rosebud.otenet.gr [195.170.0.94]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B93743D48 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 18:08:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) by rosebud.otenet.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-8) with SMTP id k09I87BG005861; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 20:08:08 +0200 Received: by flame.pc (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E270E11857; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 20:06:41 +0200 (EET) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 20:06:41 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Tuc at T-B-O-H Message-ID: <20060109180641.GA44662@flame.pc> References: <20060109171316.GB28017@flame.pc> <200601091740.k09Heg73066048@vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200601091740.k09Heg73066048@vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports/Package dilema X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 18:08:11 -0000 On 2006-01-09 12:40, Tuc at T-B-O-H wrote: > > On 2006-01-09 12:06, Tuc at T-B-O-H wrote: > > > Hi, (FBSD 5.4-RELEASE) > > > > > > I'm trying to install CVSUP on a machine with VERY LIMITED disk > > > space. Trying to build it out of ports won't happen, ezm3 is just TOO > > > TOO big. So I decided to try to install it as a package. Now I get : > > > > > > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libm.so.4" not found, required by "m3build" > > > > You can solve this by installing the pre-built packages for > > compatibility libraries: > > > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/packages/misc/compat4x-i386-5.3_4.tbz > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/packages/misc/compat5x-i386-5.4.0.8_2.tbz > > > > Then you don't have to compile anything from source. > > > I have compat4x installed already, but not 5x. Should I load 5x on > a 5.4-REL system?? Sorry for the confusion. I replied too fast. Now that I've checked the versions of libm.so in 5.X, 6.X and CURRENT I see that they have: 5.X libm.so.3 6.X libm.so.4 7.X libm.so.4 so you are probably trying to install a package that was compiled for 6.X on a 5.X system. Don't do that. It's not going to work reliably. Use packages that have been compiled for 5.X instead. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 18:12:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75BED16A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 18:12:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ml@t-b-o-h.net) Received: from vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com [204.107.90.128]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0368C43D46 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 18:11:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ml@t-b-o-h.net) Received: (from tbohml@localhost) by vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id k09IBvh1067264; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 13:11:57 -0500 (EST) From: Tuc at T-B-O-H Message-Id: <200601091811.k09IBvh1067264@vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> To: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr (Giorgos Keramidas) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 13:11:57 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20060109180641.GA44662@flame.pc> from "Giorgos Keramidas" at Jan 09, 2006 08:06:41 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Tuc at T-B-O-H , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports/Package dilema X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 18:12:00 -0000 > > I have compat4x installed already, but not 5x. Should I load 5x on > > a 5.4-REL system?? > > Sorry for the confusion. I replied too fast. Now that I've checked the > versions of libm.so in 5.X, 6.X and CURRENT I see that they have: > > 5.X libm.so.3 > 6.X libm.so.4 > 7.X libm.so.4 > > so you are probably trying to install a package that was compiled for > 6.X on a 5.X system. Don't do that. It's not going to work reliably. > Use packages that have been compiled for 5.X instead. > Understood. But I don't know how to do that.. Is there a different directory structure on FTP.FREEBSD.ORG for each? Thanks, Tuc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 18:16:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CD2C16A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 18:16:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from rosebud.otenet.gr (rosebud.otenet.gr [195.170.0.94]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEA2D43D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 18:16:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) by rosebud.otenet.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-8) with SMTP id k09IGhYs012216; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 20:16:44 +0200 Received: by flame.pc (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5BE1C11857; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 20:15:18 +0200 (EET) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 20:15:18 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Tuc at T-B-O-H Message-ID: <20060109181518.GA44845@flame.pc> References: <20060109180641.GA44662@flame.pc> <200601091811.k09IBvh1067264@vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200601091811.k09IBvh1067264@vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports/Package dilema X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 18:16:47 -0000 On 2006-01-09 13:11, Tuc at T-B-O-H wrote: > > > I have compat4x installed already, but not 5x. Should I load 5x on > > > a 5.4-REL system?? > > > > Sorry for the confusion. I replied too fast. Now that I've checked the > > versions of libm.so in 5.X, 6.X and CURRENT I see that they have: > > > > 5.X libm.so.3 > > 6.X libm.so.4 > > 7.X libm.so.4 > > > > so you are probably trying to install a package that was compiled for > > 6.X on a 5.X system. Don't do that. It's not going to work reliably. > > Use packages that have been compiled for 5.X instead. > > > Understood. But I don't know how to do that.. Is there a different > directory structure on FTP.FREEBSD.ORG for each? Yes. By using pkg_add -r you should, in general see things `work' automagically. If this doesn't work for you, you can force pkg_add to fetch from a particular release/version of the packages online by setting PACKAGESITE in the environment of the pkg_add command: # env PACKAGESITE='ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5-stable/All' \ pkg_add -r cvsup-without-gui From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 18:25:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8414A16A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 18:25:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwinner-lists@att.net) Received: from mail1.utrs.com (mail1.utrs.com [146.145.216.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01B5E43D46 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 18:25:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dwinner-lists@att.net) Received: from [10.10.10.1] [216.113.237.29] by mail1.utrs.com with ESMTP (SMTPD-9.00) id AA740764; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 13:24:52 -0500 Message-ID: <43C2AA90.1000700@att.net> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 13:25:20 -0500 From: DW User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051223) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: build world and kernel for multiple boxes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 18:25:23 -0000 Hello, I used to have a document that explained how to make buildworld and kernel on one box, and package it up/make binaries for installation on multiple systems. I can't find it anywhere, and google and me aren't getting along today. I have a bunch to make and don't feel like cvsup'ing, and building everything from source again over and over and over. Please help. Thanks, DW From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 18:27:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3BB716A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 18:27:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from smtp2.server.rpi.edu (smtp2.server.rpi.edu [128.113.2.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6442843D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 18:27:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drosih@rpi.edu) Received: from [128.113.24.47] (gilead.netel.rpi.edu [128.113.24.47]) by smtp2.server.rpi.edu (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k09IRgcr032349; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 13:27:42 -0500 Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: <20060108201419.12325.qmail@web33305.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20060108201419.12325.qmail@web33305.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 13:27:40 -0500 To: danial_thom@yahoo.com From: Garance A Drosihn Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed" X-CanItPRO-Stream: default X-RPI-SA-Score: undef - spam-scanning disabled X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . canit . ca) on 128.113.2.2 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sparc vs i386 architecture X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 18:27:45 -0000 At 12:14 PM -0800 1/8/06, Danial Thom wrote: >--- Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > user Opteron/Athlon64 - better than both :) >> > > AMD made RISC-like architecture that just runs i386-like > > code (i386+more registers and few extra instructions, > > while lots of mostly-unused instructions emulated). > >Thats hilarious, a "reduced instruction set" >processor that has extra instructions! Good one! You should think of "RISC" as a "set of reduced instructions", and not a "reduced set of instructions". Even IBM's original RISC had a fairly large *number* of instructions, but fancier do-all instructions were removed in favor of instructions which did less, and thus could always complete in fewer CPU cycles. -- Garance Alistair Drosehn = gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu Senior Systems Programmer or gad@freebsd.org Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or drosih@rpi.edu From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 18:30:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2237416A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 18:30:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ml@t-b-o-h.net) Received: from vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com [204.107.90.128]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE8343D46 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 18:30:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ml@t-b-o-h.net) Received: (from tbohml@localhost) by vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) id k09IUUqX068153; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 13:30:30 -0500 (EST) From: Tuc at T-B-O-H Message-Id: <200601091830.k09IUUqX068153@vjofn.tucs-beachin-obx-house.com> To: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr (Giorgos Keramidas) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 13:30:30 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20060109181518.GA44845@flame.pc> from "Giorgos Keramidas" at Jan 09, 2006 08:15:18 PM X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL6] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Tuc at T-B-O-H , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports/Package dilema X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 18:30:34 -0000 > > On 2006-01-09 13:11, Tuc at T-B-O-H wrote: > > > > I have compat4x installed already, but not 5x. Should I load 5x on > > > > a 5.4-REL system?? > > > > > > Sorry for the confusion. I replied too fast. Now that I've checked the > > > versions of libm.so in 5.X, 6.X and CURRENT I see that they have: > > > > > > 5.X libm.so.3 > > > 6.X libm.so.4 > > > 7.X libm.so.4 > > > > > > so you are probably trying to install a package that was compiled for > > > 6.X on a 5.X system. Don't do that. It's not going to work reliably. > > > Use packages that have been compiled for 5.X instead. > > > > > Understood. But I don't know how to do that.. Is there a different > > directory structure on FTP.FREEBSD.ORG for each? > > Yes. By using pkg_add -r you should, in general see things `work' > automagically. If this doesn't work for you, you can force pkg_add to > fetch from a particular release/version of the packages online by > setting PACKAGESITE in the environment of the pkg_add command: > > # env PACKAGESITE='ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-5-stable/All' \ > pkg_add -r cvsup-without-gui > AH!! Ok.. I didn't know to go below the i386 directory. Thank you, it looks like the "-r" option is exactly what I needed. Tuc/TBOH From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 18:35:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE90616A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 18:35:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: from chen.org.nz (chen.org.nz [210.54.19.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70A0C43D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 18:35:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: by chen.org.nz (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B936E5641C; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:35:34 +1300 (NZDT) Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:35:34 +1300 From: Jonathan Chen To: DW Message-ID: <20060109183534.GA38522@osiris.chen.org.nz> References: <43C2AA90.1000700@att.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43C2AA90.1000700@att.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: build world and kernel for multiple boxes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 18:35:37 -0000 On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 01:25:20PM -0500, DW wrote: > Hello, > > I used to have a document that explained how to make buildworld and > kernel on one box, and package it up/make binaries for installation on > multiple systems. > > I can't find it anywhere, and google and me aren't getting along today. > > I have a bunch to make and don't feel like cvsup'ing, and building > everything from source again over and over and over. cvsup, buildworld and kernel on your fastest box, and then tar and copy /usr/src and /usr/obj from that box to your slower machines. You should be able to just run installkernel and installworld on them. This all assumes that your kernel config files are identical. Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Power corrupts, Absolute Power is pretty neat From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 18:57:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 255C416A422 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 18:57:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brianjohn@fusemail.com) Received: from smtp-gw2.fusemail.net (smtp-gw2.fusemail.net [65.61.162.171]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE68F43D46 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 18:57:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brianjohn@fusemail.com) Received: from fusemail.com by smtp-gw2.fusemail.net with esmtp (MailAnyone extSMTP) id 1Ew2AU-0000YP-AZ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 13:54:58 -0500 Received: from mailanyone.net by fuse1.mailanyone.net with asmtp (MailAnyone extSMTP) id 1Ew2Cb-0001xB-Tr; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 12:57:09 -0600 Received: from 209.87.176.132 (FuseMail web AccountID 19592) by webmail.fusemail.com with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 12:57:16 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <2417.209.87.176.132.1136833036.fusewebmail-19592@webmail.fusemail.com > Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 12:57:16 -0600 (CST) From: "Brian John" To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" ,freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: FuseMail W MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Cc: Subject: RE: script to monitor internet connection X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: brianjohn@fusemail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 18:57:51 -0000 this is dsl. Sorry, I should have specified that in the beginning. Periodically my dsl modem will lose it's signal, I want to see just how often this is happening. ----- Original Message ----- > what is this, dsl, cable, dialup modem? > > Ted > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Brian John > >Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 5:23 AM > >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >Subject: script to monitor internet connection > > > > > >Hello, > >I would like to write a script to monitor my internet > >connection status. > >My home connection goes down fairly often and I would like to > >get an idea > >for just how often it goes down and if possible how long it > >goes down for. > > Could someone help me write a script that will check my > >connection to the > >internet and log whenever it goes down and possibly how long it > >goes down > >for? I want to have some evidence to give to my ISP that my > >connection is > >going down. > > > >Thanks > > > >/Brian > >_______________________________________________ > >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > >-- > >No virus found in this incoming message. > >Checked by AVG Free Edition. > >Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.15/223 - Release > >Date: 1/6/2006 > > > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 19:32:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71A3E16A420 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 19:32:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scuba@centroin.com.br) Received: from mdhost1.centroin.com.br (mail-gw1.centroin.com.br [200.225.63.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A0A443D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 19:32:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scuba@centroin.com.br) Received: from trex.centroin.com.br (trex.centroin.com.br [200.225.63.134]) by mdhost1.centroin.com.br (8.13.5/8.13.5/CIP SMTP HOST) with ESMTP id k09JWQej041258 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 17:32:26 -0200 (BRST) (envelope-from scuba@centroin.com.br) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 17:32:48 -0200 (BRST) From: scuba@centroin.com.br Sender: mpsouza@trex.centroin.com.br To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060109163523.E42320@trex.centroin.com.br> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Hits: 0.007 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.54 on 200.225.63.205 Subject: libgphoto2 and USB camera X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 19:32:30 -0000 Hi all, I'm trying to use my digital camera with gphoto2, but the software is not listing the usb devices. When I plug the came it's identified: ugen0: Canon Inc. Canon Digital Camera, rev 1.10/0.01, addr 2 But the gphoto2 is only showing the serial ports. I notice that the only file at the location it's shearching is: /usr/local/lib/gphoto2_port/0.5.1/libgphoto2_port_serial.so And, yes. The Camera is supported. I think there is something tho do with usb setup. I followed the procedures to make the devs accessible by me (not only root). This is the output of usbdevs: usbdevs addr 1: OHCI root hub, SiS addr 2: Canon Digital Camera, Canon Inc. addr 1: OHCI root hub, SiS Any clue? - Marcelo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 19:36:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D89A716A453 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 19:36:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paul.khavkine@distributel.ca) Received: from ottexbe01.corp.distributel.ca (ottexbe01.corp.distributel.ca [206.80.252.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D9DC43D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 19:36:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paul.khavkine@distributel.ca) Received: from 10.14.61.42 ([10.14.61.42]) by ottexbe01.corp.distributel.ca ([192.168.16.70]) via Exchange Front-End Server 10.14.61.70 ([10.14.61.70]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 19:36:32 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-gfm8pLcULJmx+vizyWsM" Received: from paul.mtl.distributel.net by 10.14.61.70; 09 Jan 2006 14:38:30 -0500 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:38:30 -0500 Message-ID: <1136835510.44457.5.camel@paul> X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Abort signal thread-index: AcYVU/5UsNwSStJdR4C6duE9YRFKGw== From: "Paul Khavkine" To: Subject: Abort signal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 19:36:33 -0000 --=-gfm8pLcULJmx+vizyWsM Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi folks. I'm trying to debug an application that always crashes with Signal 6 with "free(): error: chunk is already free" error. But the application does not produce a core dump to find out where it happends. Any pointers on how to debug it ? Thanx Paul --=-gfm8pLcULJmx+vizyWsM Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iQCVAwUAQ8K7tvkjFY05CfyYAQJ38QP/VHG+vrGGk+uOCXOhRgu9+/T8Prky0t+F 9hvgK9F1iPwLjJlCs09R6rhEv4up3f680gSWRwqNmcRREo9j/onx/u4wpDz2jSTk y0Oahprp9tUmzMwLYlgQ872Qq4ns1i9eXJxeO3wByyzob+5SPE47w9SAKsU3Fmy0 JnbgpUNt+DU= =YbYE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-gfm8pLcULJmx+vizyWsM-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 19:45:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34CF316A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 19:45:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from catflap.slightlystrange.org (cpc1-cmbg1-3-0-cust61.cmbg.cable.ntl.com [62.253.132.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 823DF43D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 19:45:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danielby@slightlystrange.org) Received: from danielby by catflap.slightlystrange.org with local (Exim 4.60 #0) id 1Ew2xO-000DjI-0L by authid for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 19:45:30 +0000 Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 19:45:29 +0000 From: Daniel Bye To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060109194529.GA25909@catflap.slightlystrange.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <001201c61476$3c038d40$6401a8c0@moreprivate> <0E48B181-7B8D-4935-9FFE-7878F0BDF7CE@submonkey.net> <005f01c6147e$e5a88820$6401a8c0@moreprivate> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <005f01c6147e$e5a88820$6401a8c0@moreprivate> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: danielby@slightlystrange.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on catflap.slightlystrange.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Re: premission denied executing a script X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Daniel Bye List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 19:45:35 -0000 --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 01:11:07PM -0500, RJ wrote: > Thanks Ceri but, it didn't solve my problem. > The script starts with "#!/usr/src/bin/sh" and I've tried changing it to > "#!/bin/sh" (no quotes). The end result is still permission denied. >=20 > Does the system log what the script is trying to do? I can't find anythi= ng > so far. Well, that depends on whether or not the author included logging functionality - without seeing the script, it's hard to tell... How about trying to run the script with xtrace turned on? # sh -x /the/script It causes each command to be echoed to STDERR as it executes, and may help you home in on the problem. HTH Dan --=20 Daniel Bye PGP Key: ftp://ftp.slightlystrange.org/pgpkey/dan.asc PGP Key fingerprint: 3B9D 8BBB EB03 BA83 5DB4 3B88 86FC F03A 90A1 BE8F _ ASCII ribbon campaign ( ) - against HTML, vCards and X - proprietary attachments in e-mail / \ --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDwr1ZhvzwOpChvo8RAo2LAKCmpdef8ueVNP3z62Tw9vglYfdVmgCg5PN8 nC96EfZOe1iyaT7lvHoRCWw= =/gOZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/9DWx/yDrRhgMJTb-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 19:48:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEBAF16A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 19:48:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F50243D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 19:48:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 708A65D8F; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:48:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 18145-09; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:48:18 -0500 (EST) Received: from [199.103.21.238] (pan.codefab.com [199.103.21.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3ACE5C52; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:48:18 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <1136835510.44457.5.camel@paul> References: <1136835510.44457.5.camel@paul> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <2A6E6A56-4512-4F2D-9290-BD0D1599D34D@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:48:17 -0500 To: Paul Khavkine X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Abort signal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 19:48:20 -0000 On Jan 9, 2006, at 2:38 PM, Paul Khavkine wrote: > I'm trying to debug an application that always crashes with Signal 6 > with "free(): error: chunk is already free" error. > > But the application does not produce a core dump to find out where it > happends. Run the program under gdb. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 19:49:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D08C716A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 19:49:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: from smtp2.versatel.nl (smtp2.versatel.nl [62.58.50.89]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D52B43D55 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 19:48:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 15857 invoked by uid 0); 9 Jan 2006 19:48:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.2.5]) ([62.59.173.176]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp2.versatel.nl (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for < >; 9 Jan 2006 19:48:55 -0000 Message-ID: <43C2BE4A.4070601@gmx.net> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 20:49:30 +0100 From: Frank Staals User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20060105) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Shellscript syntax question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 19:49:03 -0000 Hey, I'm trying to write a ( simple ) shellscript to move files arround, for this reason I wanted to check wether 'episode_last' has a higher value than 'episode_first' ( so that last can't be 3 if first is 60 ). So I tried : *if** [* ${episode_last} < ${episode_first}* ]*; *then fi *As I thought what would have been the correct syntax, but I got this error when running the script : ./massmove: line 136: 05: No such file or directory '05' was the value of $episode_first and '01' was the value of $episode_last Can someone tell me what I'm doing wrong/ what it should be and where I could find such info. I tried searching in google about this, but I wasn't able to find anything usefull. Thanks in advance -- -Frank Staals From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 19:50:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D2CD16A422 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 19:50:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paul.khavkine@distributel.ca) Received: from ottexbe01.corp.distributel.ca (ottexbe01.corp.distributel.ca [206.80.252.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81D2143D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 19:50:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paul.khavkine@distributel.ca) Received: from 10.14.61.42 ([10.14.61.42]) by ottexbe01.corp.distributel.ca ([192.168.16.70]) via Exchange Front-End Server 10.14.61.70 ([10.14.61.70]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 19:50:19 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-74TG08HaIElsPfFS7Hy0" Received: from paul.mtl.distributel.net by 10.14.61.70; 09 Jan 2006 14:52:18 -0500 In-Reply-To: <2A6E6A56-4512-4F2D-9290-BD0D1599D34D@mac.com> Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:52:18 -0500 Message-ID: <1136836338.44457.9.camel@paul> X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Abort signal thread-index: AcYVVeu9EmzyjWzzQdOixbK8OAmIsg== References: <1136835510.44457.5.camel@paul> <2A6E6A56-4512-4F2D-9290-BD0D1599D34D@mac.com> From: "Paul Khavkine" To: "Charles Swiger" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Abort signal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 19:50:25 -0000 --=-74TG08HaIElsPfFS7Hy0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable When i do that it crashes also but produces gdb.core The backtrace form that doesn't tell me anything about where it happends. Thanx Paul On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 14:48 -0500, Charles Swiger wrote: > On Jan 9, 2006, at 2:38 PM, Paul Khavkine wrote: > > I'm trying to debug an application that always crashes with Signal 6 > > with "free(): error: chunk is already free" error. > > > > But the application does not produce a core dump to find out where it > > happends. >=20 > Run the program under gdb. >=20 --=-74TG08HaIElsPfFS7Hy0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iQCVAwUAQ8K+8vkjFY05CfyYAQIerQP/WI4cNxNhKLbZKKZ2TUj8CZ0OVuN6qPQX bO7fon+wiABBnJYu+QS09Me0nA2GcfyN6oujdl1X6bHPmUopuJ0WC/Dborss90IM G/fB/cXLx6rArHoohy+ymPT4HUXyjFj2nBGnTHsfFeZ/TQ+q/C0aw9tUco9zLwg5 7miXfuBu80w= =uOEI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-74TG08HaIElsPfFS7Hy0-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 19:51:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8171516A420 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 19:51:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: from smtp2.versatel.nl (smtp2.versatel.nl [62.58.50.89]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 387CA43D46 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 19:51:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 20182 invoked by uid 0); 9 Jan 2006 19:51:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.2.5]) ([62.59.173.176]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp2.versatel.nl (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for < >; 9 Jan 2006 19:51:27 -0000 Message-ID: <43C2BEE2.6020306@gmx.net> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 20:52:02 +0100 From: Frank Staals User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20060105) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frank Staals References: <43C2BE4A.4070601@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <43C2BE4A.4070601@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Shellscript syntax question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 19:51:39 -0000 Frank Staals wrote: > Hey, > > I'm trying to write a ( simple ) shellscript to move files arround, > for this reason I wanted to check wether 'episode_last' has a higher > value than 'episode_first' ( so that last can't be 3 if first is 60 ). > So I tried : > > *if** [* ${episode_last} < ${episode_first}* ]*; *then > > fi > > *As I thought what would have been the correct syntax, but I got this > error when running the script : > ./massmove: line 136: 05: No such file or directory > > '05' was the value of $episode_first and '01' was the value of > $episode_last > Can someone tell me what I'm doing wrong/ what it should be and where > I could find such info. I tried searching in google about this, but I > wasn't able to find anything usefull. > Thanks in advance > damn The copied collors in the syntax-hilighting in KATE screwed up my code: it should be: if [ ${episode_last} < ${episode_first} ]; then fi -- -Frank Staals From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 19:53:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A2B216A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 19:53:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mwlucas@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org) Received: from bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org [198.22.63.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 181CC43D7E for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 19:53:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mwlucas@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org) Received: from bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (mwlucas@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k09JrhCj035817 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:53:43 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mwlucas@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org) Received: (from mwlucas@localhost) by bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id k09Jrhuj035816 for questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:53:43 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mwlucas) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:53:42 -0500 From: "Michael W. Lucas" To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060109195342.GA35789@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Spam-Score: (0) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 Cc: Subject: replacement for Acrobat Professional? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 19:53:53 -0000 Hi folks, I've been handed a whole bunch of PDFs and asked to make my comments directly in them. I'm sure there's something in ports that can do that, but my search hasn't turned up anything. (Of course, I really have no idea what I'm looking for, which hampers the search. :-) Any suggestions on a replacement for or equivalent to Acrobat Pro? I'm on a -current box running i386. Thanks for any pointers, ==ml -- Michael W. Lucas mwlucas@FreeBSD.org, mwlucas@BlackHelicopters.org http://www.BlackHelicopters.org/~mwlucas/ "The cloak of anonymity protects me from the nuisance of caring." -Non Sequitur From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 19:54:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 179A816A423 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 19:54:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5621643D70 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 19:54:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) id k09JsSNI091105; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 13:54:28 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 13:54:28 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Frank Staals Message-ID: <20060109195427.GC89638@dan.emsphone.com> References: <43C2BE4A.4070601@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43C2BE4A.4070601@gmx.net> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shellscript syntax question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 19:54:42 -0000 In the last episode (Jan 09), Frank Staals said: > I'm trying to write a ( simple ) shellscript to move files arround, > for this reason I wanted to check wether 'episode_last' has a higher > value than 'episode_first' ( so that last can't be 3 if first is 60 > ). So I tried : > > *if** [* ${episode_last} < ${episode_first}* ]*; *then > > fi > > *As I thought what would have been the correct syntax, but I got this error > when running the script : > ./massmove: line 136: 05: No such file or directory > > > '05' was the value of $episode_first and '01' was the value of > $episode_last You want "-lt" not "<". "<" is a file redirect, which is why the shell complained that it couldn't find a file named "05". I also assume all those asterisks aren't in your script. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 19:56:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C755E16A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 19:56:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rowdy@netspace.net.au) Received: from mail.netspace.net.au (thunder.netspace.net.au [203.10.110.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11FD343D77 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 19:56:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rowdy@netspace.net.au) Received: from [192.168.2.7] (220-253-38-72.VIC.netspace.net.au [220.253.38.72]) by mail.netspace.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FC734B4DD; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 06:56:45 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <43C2BFFC.7010408@netspace.net.au> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 06:56:44 +1100 From: Rowdy User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: brianjohn@fusemail.com References: <2417.209.87.176.132.1136833036.fusewebmail-19592@webmail.fusemail.com > In-Reply-To: <2417.209.87.176.132.1136833036.fusewebmail-19592@webmail.fusemail.com > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: script to monitor internet connection X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 19:56:59 -0000 Brian John wrote: > this is dsl. Sorry, I should have specified that in the beginning. > Periodically my dsl modem will lose it's signal, I want to see just > how often this is happening. If your DSL uses PPPoE then the ppp.linkup and ppp.linkdown scripts will be triggered when the link comes up or goes down respectively. See ppp(8) for details and /usr/share/examples/ppp for examples. Rowdy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 20:07:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7183516A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 20:07:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jas@math.jussieu.fr) Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA74243D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 20:07:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jas@math.jussieu.fr) Received: from riemann.math.jussieu.fr (riemann.math.jussieu.fr [134.157.13.3]) by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.13.5/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id k09K783m023594 ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 21:07:08 +0100 (CET) X-Ids: 166 Received: from grobner2.math.jussieu.fr (grobner2.math.jussieu.fr [134.157.13.119]) by riemann.math.jussieu.fr (8.12.10/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id k09K76Fk062159 ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 21:07:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from grobner2.math.jussieu.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by grobner2.math.jussieu.fr (8.13.1/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id k09K75w9006736 ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 21:07:05 +0100 Received: (from jas@localhost) by grobner2.math.jussieu.fr (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id k09K75Rs006735; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 21:07:05 +0100 Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 21:07:05 +0100 From: Albert Shih To: Kiffin Gish Message-ID: <20060109200705.GD5078@math.jussieu.fr> References: <1136735029.820.2.camel@localhost> <20060108170433.GA35310@beryl.lonsteins.com> <20060108172658.GB5646@tigger.digitaltorque.ca> <1136741853.1767.0.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1136741853.1767.0.camel@localhost> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Spam-Score: -1.44 () ALL_TRUSTED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.54 on 134.157.13.3 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.7.2 (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.166]); Mon, 09 Jan 2006 21:07:08 +0100 (CET) X-Antivirus: scanned by sophie at shiva.jussieu.fr Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which is the best open source C/C++ IDE out there? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: shih@math.jussieu.fr List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 20:07:10 -0000 Le 08/01/2006 à 18:37:33+0100, Kiffin Gish a écrit > On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 12:26 -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote: > > On 08/01/06 Ross Lonstein said: > > > > > *cough* xemacs *cough* > > > > Great OS, but he wanted an editor. ;-) > > > > > Flame away :) > > > > Hey, you asked for it. :) > > > > Mike > > Yes please: an editor plus integrated compile/build and debugger. I'm not programmer then I don't use any IDE. I manage many server for lots of students. I've install two IDE. kdevelopp (in KDE environnement) Eclipse This is for C++ «developpement» (It's not students in computer science but in mathematics.). Well you can try.... Regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. Heure local/Local time: Mon Jan 9 21:03:51 CET 2006 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 20:12:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25B7616A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 20:12:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jas@math.jussieu.fr) Received: from shiva.jussieu.fr (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63FA643D49 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 20:12:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jas@math.jussieu.fr) Received: from riemann.math.jussieu.fr (riemann.math.jussieu.fr [134.157.13.3]) by shiva.jussieu.fr (8.13.5/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id k09KCVki074263 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 21:12:31 +0100 (CET) X-Ids: 168 Received: from grobner2.math.jussieu.fr (grobner2.math.jussieu.fr [134.157.13.119]) by riemann.math.jussieu.fr (8.12.10/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id k09KCSFk063073 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 21:12:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from grobner2.math.jussieu.fr (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by grobner2.math.jussieu.fr (8.13.1/jtpda-5.4) with ESMTP id k09KCSuw006991 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 21:12:28 +0100 Received: (from jas@localhost) by grobner2.math.jussieu.fr (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id k09KCS8j006990 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 21:12:28 +0100 Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 21:12:28 +0100 From: Albert Shih To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060109201228.GE5078@math.jussieu.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Spam-Score: -1.44 () ALL_TRUSTED X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.54 on 134.157.13.3 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-1.7.2 (shiva.jussieu.fr [134.157.0.168]); Mon, 09 Jan 2006 21:12:31 +0100 (CET) X-Antivirus: scanned by sophie at shiva.jussieu.fr X-Miltered: at shiva.jussieu.fr with ID 43C2C3AF.000 by Joe's j-chkmail (http://j-chkmail.ensmp.fr)! Subject: disk mapping X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: shih@math.jussieu.fr List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 20:12:35 -0000 Hi all I've question about freebsd disk name. Actually I've a server to be change, but I don't change the disk array (external) On my new server I've install a FreeBSD 5.4 (without the disk array because it's on production). When I try to switch the old server by the new one, the kernel don't boot because the disk is re-map. When I've install the FreeBSD the / is on /dev/da0(s*) (this is without the disk array). But after I plug the disk array and reboot this is the disk array to have /dev/da0. And of course the kernel don't find the /. How can I fix this ?. I don't have the possibility to make many test or install with the disk array plug (because it's on production). For advance thanks Regards. -- Albert SHIH Universite de Paris 7 (Denis DIDEROT) U.F.R. de Mathematiques. 7 ième étage, plateau D, bureau 10 Heure local/Local time: Mon Jan 9 21:07:31 CET 2006 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 20:20:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3A8116A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 20:20:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: from smtp2.versatel.nl (smtp2.versatel.nl [62.58.50.89]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96F8A43D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 20:20:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 4757 invoked by uid 0); 9 Jan 2006 20:20:07 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.2.5]) ([62.59.173.176]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp2.versatel.nl (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for < >; 9 Jan 2006 20:20:07 -0000 Message-ID: <43C2C59A.6020906@gmx.net> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 21:20:42 +0100 From: Frank Staals User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20060105) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Nelson References: <43C2BE4A.4070601@gmx.net> <20060109195427.GC89638@dan.emsphone.com> In-Reply-To: <20060109195427.GC89638@dan.emsphone.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shellscript syntax question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 20:20:12 -0000 Dan Nelson wrote: >In the last episode (Jan 09), Frank Staals said: > > >>I'm trying to write a ( simple ) shellscript to move files arround, >>for this reason I wanted to check wether 'episode_last' has a higher >>value than 'episode_first' ( so that last can't be 3 if first is 60 >>). So I tried : >> >>*if** [* ${episode_last} < ${episode_first}* ]*; *then >> >>fi >> >>*As I thought what would have been the correct syntax, but I got this error >>when running the script : >>./massmove: line 136: 05: No such file or directory >> >> >>'05' was the value of $episode_first and '01' was the value of >>$episode_last >> >> > >You want "-lt" not "<". "<" is a file redirect, which is why the shell >complained that it couldn't find a file named "05". I also assume all >those asterisks aren't in your script. > > > About the asteriks : No they weren't but for some reason Thunderbird had problems with the color remaining from the KATE Syntax-hilighting. Anyway: thanks for the solusion, but what would be the expressions for ">" "less or equal" and "greater or equal" ? -- -Frank Staals From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 20:22:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B638516A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 20:22:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FA6743D46 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 20:22:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73D885E30; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 15:22:51 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 52797-06; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 15:22:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from [199.103.21.238] (pan.codefab.com [199.103.21.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C80675E04; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 15:22:50 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <1136836338.44457.9.camel@paul> References: <1136835510.44457.5.camel@paul> <2A6E6A56-4512-4F2D-9290-BD0D1599D34D@mac.com> <1136836338.44457.9.camel@paul> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 15:22:48 -0500 To: Paul Khavkine X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Abort signal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 20:22:55 -0000 On Jan 9, 2006, at 2:52 PM, Paul Khavkine wrote: > When i do that it crashes also but produces gdb.core > The backtrace form that doesn't tell me anything about where it > happends. If gdb itself crashes, I would suspect you've got hardware problems like bad memory. Try running memtest86.org's RAM tester overnight and see whether it picks up anything... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 20:30:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DF9016A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 20:30:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chuckr@chuckr.org) Received: from chuckr.org (april.chuckr.org [66.92.151.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7FD943D49 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 20:30:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chuckr@chuckr.org) Received: from [10.0.2.2] (may.chuckr.org [66.92.151.44]) by chuckr.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D82711512; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 15:11:50 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43C2C7FE.1010703@chuckr.org> Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 15:30:54 -0500 From: Chuck Robey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: JD Arnold References: <666bdb140601081330m3b394a02v@mail.gmail.com> <20060109140254.92455.qmail@web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which is the best open source C/C++ IDE out there? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 20:30:58 -0000 JD Arnold wrote: > Danial Thom wrote: > >> >> --- Vladimir Tsvetkov wrote: >> >>>> This is obviously a trick question, because >>> >>> real >>> >>>> programmers don't use IDEs. Case Closed. >>> >>> I'm not a real programmer, but UNIX is a great >>> developer environment. >>> It's a tool based environment. >>> Small tools, strong cohesion in what they are >>> designed for, easy ways >>> to combine them to form more complex tasks. >>> Good documentation too. >>> Actually you don't need anything else, you >>> don't need a colourfull IDE. But... >>> Maybe only few, really exceptional people can >>> benefit and grok the >>> power of this kind of environments. >>> To me the ideal "IDE" is actually a toolkit: >>> - Source Editor, preferably with a object >>> browser or other kind of a >>> source browser. An autocomplete functionallity >>> could increase >>> productivity too - this could increase quality >>> if we measure quality >>> of code by the low number of syntax mistakes, >>> but this could also be a >>> threat to quality letting the programmer write >>> without reading >>> carefully what is written - code bloating. >>> - Compiler with a debugger. We must discuss >>> about the pros. and cons. >>> of a grafic debugger versus a text-mode >>> debugger. The things are >>> getting really messy when it comes up to >>> debugging multithreading code >>> and I really don't know what is the ultimate >>> tool for this task. >>> - A build tool. Ant or make will suffice. >>> - Source control tools. CVS, SVN etc. >>> - Documentation tools. POD, Doxygen, Javadoc or >>> something else. >>> - Unit testing framework. This is not always a >>> tool. This could be a >>> language extension, or a testing API. >>> - Other tools. >>> >>> You don't need to put everything together in a >>> single swissknife-tool, >>> but this could be convenient in some cases. >>> >>> IDE vs. Toolbased Environments ??? >>> >>> Which is more productive and how to measure >>> productiveness? >>> >>> Best Regards, >>> Vladimir Tsvetkov >> >> >> Tools, schmools. vi and cc work for me. >> >> I do admit that I wish someone would get make to >> accept spaces instead of the (damn) tab. I think >> its time for that :) > > > That's why you should graduate to Emacs - with the makefile syntax > highlighting, > you'll at least see the differences between tabs and spaces before > getting into > trouble due to bad whitespacing!-) > you're certainly giving a viewpoint that has a great deal of truth to it, but I guess what scares folks is the horrible, horrible emacs learning curve,. At one point in my career (in school, lisp programming) I learned/used emacs. I admit, it's got so much power, there isn't even a close competitor. BUT at that time, I had a genius girl programmer at my side, and she helped me with emacs syntax so heavily it was funny, and so I could make use of emacs without really having to scale the learning curve. If I'd actually had to scale that learning curve, do you think I would have, even COULD have used emacs? One of the worst things I had happen, I needed, one year later, to go back to vi for a job, and just forgot enough emacs usages, and never went back. I'd love to, but I'd have to find another genius Lisp girlfriend, before I could do that. Likely? That's why emacs isn't the world's most popular editor/IDE. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 20:32:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF6B016A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 20:32:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1876B43D72 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 20:32:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) id k09KWDmP064155; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:32:13 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:32:13 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Frank Staals Message-ID: <20060109203212.GD89638@dan.emsphone.com> References: <43C2BE4A.4070601@gmx.net> <20060109195427.GC89638@dan.emsphone.com> <43C2C59A.6020906@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43C2C59A.6020906@gmx.net> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shellscript syntax question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 20:32:23 -0000 In the last episode (Jan 09), Frank Staals said: > Dan Nelson wrote: > >In the last episode (Jan 09), Frank Staals said: > > > >>I'm trying to write a ( simple ) shellscript to move files arround, > >>for this reason I wanted to check wether 'episode_last' has a > >>higher value than 'episode_first' ( so that last can't be 3 if > >>first is 60). So I tried : > >> > >>*if** [* ${episode_last} < ${episode_first}* ]*; *then > >> > >>fi > >> > >>*As I thought what would have been the correct syntax, but I got this > >>error when running the script : > >>./massmove: line 136: 05: No such file or directory > >> > >> > >>'05' was the value of $episode_first and '01' was the value of > >>$episode_last > > > >You want "-lt" not "<". "<" is a file redirect, which is why the > >shell complained that it couldn't find a file named "05". I also > >assume all those asterisks aren't in your script. > > About the asteriks : No they weren't but for some reason Thunderbird > had problems with the color remaining from the KATE > Syntax-hilighting. Anyway: thanks for the solusion, but what would > be the expressions for ">" "less or equal" and "greater or equal" ? See the "test" manpage. -gt, -le, -ge. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 20:32:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EBCA16A420 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 20:32:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from willmaier@ml1.net) Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 520A743D48 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 20:32:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from willmaier@ml1.net) Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 280E3D2E903 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 15:32:19 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 09 Jan 2006 15:32:19 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: t4GWFEZHgOVa4WAZzTLt5QejXgX1tpcTH9ydyfewgUKJ 1136838736 Received: from localhost (mdsnwikwbas08-pool4-a199.mdsnwikw.tds.net [69.129.195.199]) by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B5EB57146F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 15:32:15 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:32:16 -0600 From: Will Maier To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060109203216.GB9914@merkur.atekomi.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <43C2BE4A.4070601@gmx.net> <20060109195427.GC89638@dan.emsphone.com> <43C2C59A.6020906@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43C2C59A.6020906@gmx.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Subject: Re: Shellscript syntax question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 20:32:34 -0000 On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 09:20:42PM +0100, Frank Staals wrote: > Anyway: thanks for the solusion, but what would be the expressions for > ">" "less or equal" and "greater or equal" ? man 1 test the '[' and ']' that surround the if-statement are shorthand for the test(1) utility. The man page has a list of the different primaries available. -- o--------------------------{ Will Maier }--------------------------o | jabber:..wcmaier@jabber.ccc.de | email:..........wcmaier@ml1.net | | \.........wcmaier@cae.wisc.edu | \..........wcmaier@cae.wisc.edu | *------------------[ BSD Unix: Live Free or Die ]------------------* From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 20:41:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D2DE16A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 20:41:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jdkullmann@aliencamel.com) Received: from aliencamel.com (aliencamel.com [69.93.161.116]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2354443D4C for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 20:41:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jdkullmann@aliencamel.com) X-Virus-Scanned: by both ClamAV and Kaspersky at http://aliencamel.com/ Received: from [67.81.216.207] (account jdkullmann@aliencamel.com) by aliencamel.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.2.10) with HTTP id 20604408 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 20:41:55 +0000 From: "JK" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.2.10 Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 16:41:55 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: 6.0 on Apple's Intel Developer Platform? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 20:41:57 -0000 I can get the 6.0 CD1 to boot ok on Apple's Intel Developers Platform but the usb keyboard is not recognized. Do I have to do something special to use a USB keyboard? There is no PS/2 keyboard or mouse port on that platform. I'd like to try installing 6.0 on this box From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 21:00:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2ED9916A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 21:00:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msoulier@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 706A043D48 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 21:00:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from msoulier@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i2so46436nfe for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 12:59:34 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=rnNM1XgEDgurjAP12ry3W1mTsKi9RLrwwtI6AS9lFitkWwocrSmWNg3VeAZ1VcUQP/MGB7YfR8coIku7wGiZUxSlDKvBQloTlicDSKK65DCdMuGbGsLKxjL3rbgHfdv85CngsoU0Gnmy9SDMdYFQY7y8vvK3L/8Kyb7bH7xhbKE= Received: by 10.48.218.18 with SMTP id q18mr961745nfg; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 12:59:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.233.11 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 12:59:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 15:59:34 -0500 From: "Michael P. Soulier" Sender: msoulier@gmail.com To: Chuck Robey In-Reply-To: <43C2C7FE.1010703@chuckr.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <666bdb140601081330m3b394a02v@mail.gmail.com> <20060109140254.92455.qmail@web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <43C2C7FE.1010703@chuckr.org> Cc: JD Arnold , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which is the best open source C/C++ IDE out there? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 21:00:10 -0000 On 1/9/06, Chuck Robey wrote: > you're certainly giving a viewpoint that has a great deal of truth to > it, but I guess what scares folks is the horrible, horrible emacs > learning curve,. At one point in my career (in school, lisp > programming) I learned/used emacs. I admit, it's got so much power, > there isn't even a close competitor. Actually, I find Vim superior in most respects. I would use Emacs if someone would fix the broken modes that are accepted as best-in-class for most of the uses that I need. Meanwhile, Vim just works. Mike -- Michael P. Soulier "Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex... It takes a touch of genius - and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction." --Albert Einstein From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 21:18:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCEBC16A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 21:18:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mbaki@whywire.com) Received: from eastrmmtao05.cox.net (eastrmmtao05.cox.net [68.230.240.34]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 380B243D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 21:18:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mbaki@whywire.com) Received: from marvin.whywire.com ([68.227.194.65]) by eastrmmtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060109211753.VAST14098.eastrmmtao05.cox.net@marvin.whywire.com> for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 16:17:53 -0500 Received: from [192.168.3.209] ([192.168.3.209]) by marvin.whywire.com (8.13.4/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k09HhEE7008251 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 12:43:14 -0500 (EST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Monah baki Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 16:17:57 -0500 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.623) Subject: Atheros card X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 21:18:03 -0000 Hi all, I'm running freebsd 6.0 on a soekris box. I'm trying to configure it as a access point. %dmesg | grep ath0 ath0: mem 0xa0010000-0xa001ffff irq 11 at device 14.0 on pci0 ath0: Ethernet address: 00:02:6f:20:8f:4a ath0: mac 5.6 phy 4.1 5ghz radio 1.7 2ghz radio 2.3 If I configure ath0 in 11b mode, it works fine. However if I configure it in 11g mode or 11a mode, I no longer can connect to it, and my ssid disappears from my macs available access points option. My client is a mac os x 10.4. Here's the ifconfig output for autoselect, 11g and 11a which fails: %ifconfig ath0 media autoselect mode autoselect mediaopt hostap %ifconfig -v ath0 ath0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 192.168.2.187 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.2.255 inet6 fe80::202:6fff:fe20:8f4a%ath0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x6 ether 00:02:6f:20:8f:4a media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect (autoselect ) status: associated ssid apname channel 36 (5180) bssid 00:02:6f:20:8f:4a authmode OPEN privacy OFF deftxkey UNDEF powersavemode OFF powersavesleep 100 txpowmax 28 txpower 60 rtsthreshold 2346 fragthreshold 2346 -pureg protmode CTS -wme ssid SHOW apbridge dtimperiod 1 bintval 100 %ifconfig ath0 mode 11g %ifconfig -v ath0 ath0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 192.168.2.187 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.2.255 inet6 fe80::202:6fff:fe20:8f4a%ath0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x6 ether 00:02:6f:20:8f:4a media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect mode 11g status: associated ssid apname channel 1 (2412) bssid 00:02:6f:20:8f:4a authmode OPEN privacy OFF deftxkey UNDEF powersavemode OFF powersavesleep 100 txpowmax 36 txpower 60 rtsthreshold 2346 fragthreshold 2346 -pureg protmode CTS -wme ssid SHOW apbridge dtimperiod 1 bintval 100 %ifconfig ath0 mode 11a %ifconfig -v ath0 ath0: flags=8843 mtu 1500 inet 192.168.2.187 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.2.255 inet6 fe80::202:6fff:fe20:8f4a%ath0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x6 ether 00:02:6f:20:8f:4a media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect mode 11a status: associated ssid apname channel 36 (5180) bssid 00:02:6f:20:8f:4a authmode OPEN privacy OFF deftxkey UNDEF powersavemode OFF powersavesleep 100 txpowmax 28 txpower 60 rtsthreshold 2346 fragthreshold 2346 -pureg protmode CTS -wme ssid SHOW apbridge dtimperiod 1 bintval 100 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 22:04:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A29F116A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 22:04:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from luke.bakken@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E401043D4C for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 22:04:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from luke.bakken@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i34so3260668wra for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 14:04:27 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=WJWHV/BuZq47cdxlL10Xqj7MtE4FFA6sEPvSa1mVDYR6mKksJx18WZRiM9nn2D+nMXu8TmtWjLIzIKbRtZ4Hcl0ZyCP2060jWFsyg/2LAPuKiRXP+OOLgefojkRRrDmh34m+YQwFsSyvEKglyMB44QsJEWFGJMkjMMrsVqoEUdA= Received: by 10.65.186.10 with SMTP id n10mr2807864qbp; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 14:04:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.153.11 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:04:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6acc6ca40601091404o4730400eve7ea71e028d603f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:04:27 -0800 From: Luke Bakken To: Frank Staals In-Reply-To: <43C2C59A.6020906@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <43C2BE4A.4070601@gmx.net> <20060109195427.GC89638@dan.emsphone.com> <43C2C59A.6020906@gmx.net> Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Dan Nelson Subject: Re: Shellscript syntax question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 22:04:32 -0000 > About the asteriks : No they weren't but for some reason Thunderbird had > problems with the color remaining from the KATE Syntax-hilighting. > Anyway: thanks for the solusion, but what would be the expressions for > ">" "less or equal" and "greater or equal" ? Frank, Since you're getting into shell programming beyond the very basics I would recommend using a more "able" shell like ksh or bash for your programming or learning a scripting language like perl, ruby or python. For instance, in ksh to do arithmetic comparisons you use the (( )) syntax: if (( VAR1 <=3D VAR2)) then print VAR1 $VAR1 is less than VAR2 $VAR2 fi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 22:19:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C70C416A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 22:19:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from annkok2001@yahoo.com) Received: from web53309.mail.yahoo.com (web53309.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.49.99]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0930343D4C for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 22:19:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from annkok2001@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 20906 invoked by uid 60001); 9 Jan 2006 22:19:41 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=G+j6uTuoD3KrL1wkrvXbu1uLQ8UuMlFJk2oioPZfBEIyjxIvYgynnEyB0H3+e6fY6rKq0ucZdCit6ZgCOskw0DcpssEkVf67n2mQJvcgVohgahKXC1DxtbagIGRrSmx/80Hrm/rcEVjp/CxqDSQ98ptr31Hra7emGHvyHXu1n7E= ; Message-ID: <20060109221941.20904.qmail@web53309.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [66.49.254.13] by web53309.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 14:19:41 PST Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:19:41 -0800 (PST) From: ann kok To: "Andrew P." In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: pls help network thoughput X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 22:19:42 -0000 Hi Andrew and all I installed freebsd 6.0, complied the kernal and put the polling setting to sysctl.conf after rebooting, it shows "kern.polling.enable is deprecated" use ifconfig (8) Do you have any ideas? 2/ how can I page up the see previous boot message in the console? Thank you for your help --- "Andrew P." wrote: > On 1/7/06, ann kok wrote: > > Dear Andrew > > > > Thank you for your help in advance > > > > I keep checking the loading. it is running fine. > the > > load averages is not over to 1.0 > > > > > > System info: > > Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz > > 2G memory > > > > for the sysctl var: > > > > kern.polling.enable=1 > > kern.polling.user_frac=10 > > kern.ipc.somaxconn=2048 > > kern.polling.poll_in_trap=1 > > > > I don't run iperf and my switch is not > managable. > > > > could you provide any hints to check it? > > > > and tune the system also. > > > > Thank you again > > > > > > > > last pid: 47008; load averages: 0.00, 0.02, > 0.02 > > up > > 80+11:09:17 22:42:18 > > 31 processes: 1 running, 30 sleeping > > CPU states: % user, % nice, % system, > > % interrupt, % idle > > Mem: 100M Active, 1639M Inact, 201M Wired, 60M > Cache, > > 199M Buf, 11M Free > > With such a high-spec box, you should probably be > running > FreeBSD 6. It has much more polling related sysctl > tunable. > We've got too FreeBSD 5 firewalls at our site (which > are doing > just fine), and I'm gonna upgrade them to 6.0 one of > these > days. > > Look at "netstat -s" to see how many packets are > "broken". > Maybe your switch/cabling can't cope with the load. > > Where are the figures from the top output. I only > see percent > signs. > > Try running iperf. It's really easy. Just install > the port on two > boxes, run iperf -s on one and iperf -c > on the > other. > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 22:20:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABE8D16A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 22:20:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gandalf@messias.qhigh.com) Received: from messias.qhigh.com (3e70dc32.adsl.enternet.hu [62.112.220.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5687743D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 22:20:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gandalf@messias.qhigh.com) Received: from [172.16.0.26] (earth.msnet [172.16.0.26]) by messias.qhigh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD4D15C3D for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 00:26:21 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43C03ED4.1070404@messias.qhigh.com> Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 23:21:08 +0100 From: User Gandalf User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051228) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Xorg - how to disable some video modes? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 22:20:31 -0000 Hello, I have FreeBSD 6.0 with an xorg server installed. I followed the instructions in the handbook, and I could create a working xorg.conf file. My problem is that xorg starts with 1920x1440@61Hz. I would like to have 1024x768@101Hz by default. I tried to add Modes "1024x768" Also tried to use gtf to create a 1024x768@100Hz mode and add a UseModes "1024x768_100.00" section. But I was not able to disable 1920x1440, 1600x1200 and 1280x1024. What I do know is that I go to the control panel of xfce each time and switch back to 1024x768 manually. Thanks for your help Les From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 22:57:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DED716A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 22:57:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD3BD43D46 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 22:57:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k09MvFb7013024 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 23:57:15 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k09MvE4r013021 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 23:57:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 23:57:14 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060109232517.Q88554@chylonia.3miasto.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: Direct Connect unix client - big problem on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 22:57:24 -0000 i installed dctc-0.84.1 from prebuild .tbz on FreeBSD 6.0/amd64 and (with parameters that i used before on NetBSD/i386 system): INFO ] ""Direct Connect Text Client v0.84.1| hubip: dchub.l. hubport: 1411 VAR ] ""cnx_status|1| file exists. creating new sema. creating. semid=196610 created 2FD103C3. DCTC: db_appinit, open /home/tools/dcftp/.dctc/bDB fails: Invalid argument using google i found this bug common on 64-bit and no solve, so i tried to run 32-bit version. i built statically linked dctc from ports on my home i386 machine (mostly doing make in ports and then modifying a bit one makefile) that's an effect: INFO ] ""Direct Connect Text Client v0.84.1| hubip: dchub.l. hubport: 1411 VAR ] ""cnx_status|1| file exists. creating new sema. creating. semid=262146 created 30B0214D. PRGBR] ""init_share|0|Initialize shared file database| PRGBR] ""init_share|100|Shared file database Initialized| VAR ] ""cnx_status|3| Segmentation fault last moments are: 45589 dctc CALL flock(0xd,0x8) 45589 dctc RET flock 0 45589 dctc CALL close(0xd) 45589 dctc RET close 0 45589 dctc CALL sigprocmask(0x3,0xffffb020,0x819911c) 45589 dctc RET sigprocmask 0 45589 dctc CALL kse_create(0x819240c,0) 45589 dctc RET kse_create 0 45589 dctc CALL mmap(0xffcfd000,0x101000,0x3,0x400,0xffffffff,0,0,0) 45589 dctc RET mmap -3158016/0xffcfd000 45589 dctc CALL mprotect(0xffcfd000,0x1000,0) 45589 dctc RET mprotect 0 45589 dctc CALL kse_create(0x8192c8c,0x1) 45589 dctc RET kse_create 0 45589 dctc RET fork 0 45589 dctc CALL __sysctl(0xffffaf68,0x2,0xffffaf70,0xffffaf64,0x816efc8,0x18) 45589 dctc RET __sysctl 0 45589 dctc PSIG SIGSEGV SIG_DFL what to do to run successfully DC text client under FreeBSD 6.0/amd64 thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 03:16:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1813316A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 03:16:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 839B243D4C for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 03:16:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k0A3G98B060365 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 20:16:09 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) with ESMTP id k0A3G9es060362 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 20:16:09 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 20:16:09 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060109200856.E60336@wonkity.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 09 Jan 2006 20:16:10 -0700 (MST) Subject: LIRC -- Infrared Remote Control -- With 6.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 03:16:11 -0000 Has anyone managed to get LIRC to run on FreeBSD 6.0? I have a small receiver on the serial port, /dev/cuad0 on 6.0. irrecord can't lock /dev/cuad0: -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 03:23:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FF1C16A420 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 03:23:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA7443D46 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 03:23:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k0A3Njmr060388 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 20:23:45 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) with ESMTP id k0A3Njv9060385 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 20:23:45 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 20:23:45 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060109201638.Y60336@wonkity.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 09 Jan 2006 20:23:45 -0700 (MST) Subject: LIRC -- Infrared Remote Control -- With 6.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 03:23:46 -0000 (sorry about earlier chopped-off message) Has anyone managed to get LIRC to run on FreeBSD 6.0? I have a small receiver on the serial port, /dev/cuad0 on 6.0. irrecord can't open /dev/cuad0: # irrecord -d /dev/cuad0 /tmp/test.conf irrecord - application for recording IR-codes for usage with lirc Copyright (C) 1998,1999 Christoph Bartelmus(lirc@bartelmus.de) irrecord: could not open /dev/cuad0 irrecord: irman_init(): Operation timed out irrecord: could not init hardware (lircd running ? --> close it, check permissions) lircd runs, but as soon as irw is run, exits with this log entry: Jan 9 20:21:39 speedy.wonkity.com lircd 0.7.2: lircd(irman) ready Jan 9 20:21:41 speedy.wonkity.com lircd 0.7.2: accepted new client on /var/lirc/lircd Jan 9 20:21:43 speedy.wonkity.com lircd 0.7.2: could not open /dev/cuad0 Jan 9 20:21:43 speedy.wonkity.com lircd 0.7.2: irman_init(): Operation timed out Jan 9 20:21:43 speedy.wonkity.com lircd 0.7.2: caught signal A quick web search seems to show people using this, although perhaps not with 6.0. -Warren Block * Rapid City, South Dakota USA From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 04:25:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 959A916A422 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 04:25:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B946143D49 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 04:25:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k0A4TEP64526; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 20:29:15 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Robert Slade" Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 20:25:43 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <1136705674.23844.15.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Importance: Normal Cc: Michael Bernstein , jasonharback , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Sparc vs i386 architecture X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 04:25:56 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Robert Slade >Sent: Saturday, January 07, 2006 11:35 PM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt >Cc: Michael Bernstein; jasonharback; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: RE: Sparc vs i386 architecture > > >On Sun, 2006-01-08 at 04:51, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: >> What machine code exploits currently exist for FreeBSD on the i386 >> other than the F00F bug, which has already been patched out? >> I wasn't aware of any. >> >> Ted >> > >Ted, > >Good point. However, in my case I'm using the sparc (its a U10) because >it there. I originally got it as I needed to find out about >Solaris/Sparc. It was lying in the back of a cupboard so when I started >to investigate replacements for a domain based on W2k using FBSD I >dusted it off and I'm using it for the BDC. The only thing I really >noticed is the disk(s) are slow compared (SUN's IDE) to the PDC which >has a fast scsi setup. Given the choice I think I would still go for a >good sparc from Ebay over a i386. > We still have a couple Sparcs in service, doing odd jobs. Mainly haven't gotten around to replacing them, however I will probably keep at least 1 running indefinitely for software portability testing. I think with the cost of PC hardware today that a brand new device is less trouble for a production server and faster as well. You can get a clone rack mount server built on an Intel desktop motherboard with mirrored SATA 200GB disks for a bit under $1000 now that will kick the stuffing out of just about everything older that you can lay your hands on, and be more reliable. Where I still use older gear is for servers that there's -no- money budgeted for, and that there's a vested interest in keeping -off- the radar scope of upper management for political reasons. For example that older 300Mhz P2 server decomissioned a few years ago makes a great platform to run Nessus on, and the last thing I want is a discussion among the upper managers who don't know any better of the merits of whether or not we should be attempting to break into our own desktops. It's much better to find the insecure desktop then go to the upper managers and tell them that you caught employee X who keeps bringing in his personal laptop and docking it to the network, and who never updates it because way back in 1892 an update broke his 2,000 year old shareware wigit he downloaded for free, and now he never updates, that his precious toy has 10 security holes in it. You get what I mean. In any organization there's a need for "stealth" servers that aren't publically acknowledged by the IT group as existing, but nevertheless have key tasks, if not politically controversial ones, to perform. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 04:58:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D77816A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 04:58:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C999E43D45 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 04:58:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k0A52PP64663 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 21:02:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 20:58:53 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <20060108095843.F05E.GERARD@seibercom.net> Importance: Normal Subject: RE: Sparc vs i386 architecture X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 04:58:55 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Gerard Seibert >Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2006 7:02 AM >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: Sparc vs i386 architecture > > >Danial Thom > >> Frankly, people who spend $9000. worth of time >> dicking around with some old piece of junk to >> avoid buying a $400. computer crack me up. :) > >Yes, it is amassing. I have a friend who has spent thousands of dollars >keeping his old car running. He could have purchased a new one with a >new warranty, etc. and have saved all that money, but he refused. For >some individuals, the challenge is the real thrill that they crave. > That is an interesting, if very inaccurate, analogy, and as a car guy that does my own wrenching, let me tell you why. Computer gear every year gets cheaper and faster and better. Cars by contrast, have not improved much over the last 20 years - unless you count larger cupholders as an improvement - and espically they haven't changed at all over the last 10. Ever since EFI and airbags became standard on vehicles there just haven't been any compelling or = significant improvements. In fact for many models, the engine designs themselves are the same as 20 years ago. For example the 2.4 Turbo used in=20 the 2006 Chrysler PT Cruiser went into production in 1994, the 4 speed computer-controlled transmission used in that car went into production in 1989. Many parts for that transmission in fact are the same - how many computers do you know that you can use a 17 year old part in? Of course, for the general public that doesen't work on their own cars they are happy to swallow the marketing bullshit by the car companies that the vehicles are "redesigned', redesigned my ass. All that changes is the sheet metal. If an old car has good paint and straight sheetmetal, it is cheaper to replace the powertrain, both engine and transmission, than to buy a new car - also rebuilt engines and transmissions carry a warranty too, didn't you know? Also a new car requires comprehensive insurance by the lender which is much more expensive than just liability. In areas of the United States, like the East Coast particularly where = they salt the roads, keeping an old car running isn't an option because in 10 years it will be rusted out. Or flooded out like in the South. But it is very common still to see quite a number of 20 year old = vehicles on the road in the Pacific NW, and California. What matters with cars is how they were maintained. If the vehicle was well maintained and the owner got right on the small stuff and fixed it when it broke, and did oil changes religiously and antifreeze changes and so on, it can go up to 300,000 miles before the engine is shot, and many people that drive gently can get 150-200K miles out of a transmission. If it's still in immaculate shape and the powertrain conks out, then it's cheaper to fix. If, however, it's got holes in the upholstery, standing water in the carpet, and the headliner stinks like a beach at low tide, than that is a different story. A computer by contrast, really has no maintainence that needs to be done, other than keeping it cool. And long before any car gets close to the end of it's lifespan, a computer will be hopelessly obsolete. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 05:18:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3748816A420 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:18:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA57F43D48 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:18:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k0A5LZP64944; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 21:21:35 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 21:18:03 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <20060109125228.GG24383@math.jussieu.fr> Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: FreeBSD on DL145G2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:18:21 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: Albert Shih [mailto:shih@math.jussieu.fr] >Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 4:52 AM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt >Cc: shih@math.jussieu.fr; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: FreeBSD on DL145G2 > > > Le 07/01/2006 à 20:36:48-0800, Ted Mittelstaedt a écrit >> >> Since these are new you need to return them to HP and exchange for >> a different server, or get your money back. > >Good answer...... > >It's the f@!(*)# builder to forget put a scsi-terminator..... > Hate it when that happens. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 05:35:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88D6616A420 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:35:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEFC243D48 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:35:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F2F62C92C for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 01:35:38 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09861-07 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 01:35:38 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-222-82-85.eastlink.ca [24.222.82.85]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A8A762C92B for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 01:35:38 -0400 (AST) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4BF623C734; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 01:35:37 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B17C3C732 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 01:35:37 -0400 (AST) Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 01:35:37 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060110013448.R48499@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org Subject: My new DL360 G4P just arrived ... is it Dual-Core? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:35:40 -0000 'k, I'm a bit confused, since I didn't quite get what I was looking for, but it was what I ordered *sigh* And, in fact, might actually be what I want without realizing it ... basically, I wanted a Dual Xeon server ... got a Single one ... looking at the HP web site, though, I see: "Powerful HP ProLiant DL360 G4p is now available Dual-core 2.8GHz Intel Xeon processors that offer 22MB L2 cache and 64-bit support." Does this mean that my CPUs *are* Dual-Core, or just that I can order them that way? Will Dual-Core show two processors in POST, or is it not until I get to the OS itself that I see both? ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 05:36:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B7A616A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:36:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE84243D45 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:36:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D22062C92C for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 01:36:05 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 09639-08 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 01:36:05 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-222-82-85.eastlink.ca [24.222.82.85]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 119CE62C92B for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 01:36:05 -0400 (AST) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5D59A3B22C; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 01:36:04 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C97939237 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 01:36:04 -0400 (AST) Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 01:36:04 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060110013542.M48499@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org Subject: HP's iLO ... over SSH? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:36:06 -0000 'k, I figured out to go to the IP on the web to see the iLO interface, but, how do you do SSH into the box? I see the configuration options through iLO's interface, but: > ssh 192.168.1.105 ssh: connect to host 192.168.1.105 port 22: Connection refused so, obviously I'm mis-understanding something? Is the "Remote KVM" funcationality really only available through the Java based web interface? :( Thanks ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 05:49:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EACA716A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:49:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6262743D45 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:49:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k0A5qhP65069; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 21:52:43 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Ceri Davies" Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 21:49:11 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <20060109111637.GG97223@submonkey.net> Importance: Normal Cc: questions@freebsd.org, Robert Slade Subject: RE: Spamcop listed - need help to diagnose why X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:49:28 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: Ceri Davies [mailto:ceri@submonkey.net] >Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 3:17 AM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt >Cc: questions@freebsd.org; Robert Slade >Subject: Re: Spamcop listed - need help to diagnose why > > >> The damage done to the Internet by just a single host that might >> previously gotten infected with a mass-mailer, but now isn't, far >> outweighs the damage done >> to the Internet by having legitimate mail to a domain be >delayed for a few >> minutes. >> >> Obviously the best choice is to replace the mailserver, good >luck though >> in companies using Lotus Notes. > >Agreed, but my point is that there is no need to delay the mail. Simply >not listing the MX record in the public DNS would achieve the exact same >thing, without forcing my MTA to wait for a timeout. > In a perfect world it would - but the same organizations that are out there using archaic versions of Exchange, or notes mail, or whatever - these are the organizations that are often in very imperfect worlds, and you sometimes have to make compromises. As I said earlier if you have a choice between elimiinating a spam sink, and delaying everyone mailing to them a bit, and there's no other option, then which is better? > >> Nobody else on the Internet is bothered that your own >> personal mail to your own recipients gets delayed, so I think your >> mistaken in calling this massively rude. > >Well of course they aren't, but nobody else on the Internet is bothered >if I take a crap on your doorstep. That doesn't preclude it from being >completely out of order. > Hey, maybe I am low on fertillizer for the flower bed! One man's crap is another man's treasure, after all. > The real analogy is an advert that says: > > Call 123-456-7890 or 123-456-7891 to speak to us. > We'd prefer it if you called 123-456-7890 as it's cheaper for > us. > >This is exactly what MX records state. Then you just let 123-456-7890 >ring, with no intention of ever picking it up. Actually, if your entire goal is to get assholes to call you, this might be a good way to select them - you would have to run caller ID on both lines and eliminate the people who's phone number showed up on 7890 first. Although, come to think of it, assholes probably have a better chance than normal of blocking caller ID. Oh well just got to make both of them 800 numbers, then, that will defeat the caller ID blocks. >Saying "so don't call" >isn't good enough, as I have to ring it to find out that nobody is >answering, and I *still* don't know if they will answer next time I >call; there is certainly no indication that they won't, and I have a >card in my hand that says that they will. > > >> However, you are also fundamentally missing the point of the scam as >> well. ANY prefilter system even if you use internal routes, >or a second >> set of nameservers, is able to be hijacked by a spammer in >this manner. >> And a spammer can detect prefilter hosts simply by sending a single >> forgery with a legitimate senders address and a bogus >recipient address, >> and when the message is bounced, they can look at the headers and see >> if a prefilter is involved. They don't even have to look at the >> DNS MX records. > >I don't see how I am missing the fundamental point; I never made any >attempt to address it. All I said was that listing systems that do not >exchange mail in the mail exchanger records is rude, and you can not >convince me otherwise. > And what I said was that these sorts of setups cannot be used anymore due to the spammers using them as relays - whether or not it is a single MX listing or multiple MXes listed. I cannot in fact think of a single way now to list an MX host that only relays mail, whether or not it's a single listing or multiple listings, whether or not the multiple listings all accept mail or only some of them accept mail, whether or not you have an access.db setup that filters by domain name or not, or IP number or not, that does not create a relay host that a spammer can use for relaying. That is the fundamental point - which is that a setup like your saying where your listing a system that does not exchange mail in the mail exchanger records - just cannot exist anymore, because if it does then it means a relay MX host somewhere, which can be used for spamming. So the entire discussion is academic I think. But, that doesen't make it a boring discussion. Probably way beyond a lot of the posters here, though. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 05:52:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C69B316A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:52:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andvari@gmx.de) Received: from smtprelay03.ispgateway.de (smtprelay03.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.15]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C65C643D45 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:52:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andvari@gmx.de) Received: (qmail 5363 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2006 05:52:04 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO andvari.ath.cx) ([pbs]750710@[84.168.101.240]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay03.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 10 Jan 2006 05:52:04 -0000 Received: from andvari.ath.cx (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by andvari.ath.cx (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0A5q0Ei067411 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 06:52:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from andvari@gmx.de) Received: (from mm@localhost) by andvari.ath.cx (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k0A5pwF6067235 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 06:51:58 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from andvari@gmx.de) X-Authentication-Warning: andvari.ath.cx: mm set sender to andvari@gmx.de using -f Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 06:51:58 +0100 From: Martin =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=F6ller?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060110055157.GC15566@andvari.ath.cx> References: <43C03ED4.1070404@messias.qhigh.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43C03ED4.1070404@messias.qhigh.com> X-URL: http://www.andvari.de/ X-PGP: Download public key from http://www.pb-mm.de/pgp X-Phone: +49 (0) 6126 58 38 36 X-Fax: +49 (0) 6126 58 45 78 X-Mobile: +49 (0) 1638 696 595 X-Location: Idstein, Hessen, Deutschland, Europa X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6 (RELENG_6) X-Accept-Language: de en X-Uptime: 3 mins User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Subject: Re: Xorg - how to disable some video modes? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:52:06 -0000 * User Gandalf [07-01-2006 23:21:08 +0100]: > section. But I was not able to disable 1920x1440, 1600x1200 and > 1280x1024. What I do know is that I go to the control panel of xfce each > time and switch back to 1024x768 manually. Take a look in which "SubSection" you make the changes... If you prefer 24 bit colour, set the mode like this, and don't forget to add the line with "DefaultDepth", so X knows in which colour mode you want to start. Section "Screen" Identifier "Screen0" DefaultDepth 24 Device "Card0" Monitor "Monitor0" SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Depth 24 Modes "1024x768" EndSubSection EndSection Regards, Martin -- Martin Moeller From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 05:56:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E51E216A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:56:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ABAB43D45 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:56:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k0A5vKP65098; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 21:57:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "David Banning" , "Robert Slade" Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 21:53:48 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <6db0aaaa0601090721w5951cf1fs113d9125877a588d@mail.gmail.com> Importance: Normal Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Spamcop listed - need help to diagnose why X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:56:25 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of David Banning >Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 7:21 AM >To: Robert Slade >Cc: questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: Spamcop listed - need help to diagnose why > > >Thanks for the response, Robert. I know tmda and such services anger >some people. I also find other people who ask me how they can get >such a service, only because spam is so difficult to block. I guess it >depends on how important email is to you. >I would never ask a question >on this board and expect people to confirm, > David, that is the fundamental problem with this kind of service. The vast, vast majority of users that do e-mail confirmations do NOT use them appropriately. If everyone that used it was like you and put some brains into turning it off when posting to a public list or some such, it wouldn't be a problem. But the fact that spam exists at all - because for spam to work you need a critical mass of stupid people willing to pay spammers for their hair tonics or whatever they are selling - should prove conclusively that there's too many stupid people out there on the e-mail network for a system like mail confirmations to be of any wide value. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 05:57:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4794916A42F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:57:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C459843D46 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:57:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k0A60RP65116; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 22:00:28 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: , "jdow" , "David Banning" Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 21:56:55 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <20060109161408.21651.qmail@web33304.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Spamcop listed - need help to diagnose why X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:57:02 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Danial Thom >Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 8:14 AM >To: jdow; David Banning >Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: Spamcop listed - need help to diagnose why > > > >I'm of the opposite thinking. I'd rather sort >through a bunch of spam everyday rather than miss >1 important message. If I miss 1 inquiry it could >cost me 1000s of dollars. Spam is an annoyance, >nothing more. There is no sense cutting off your >nose to spite your face. > This is coming from someone who hides behind a yahoo address. A they say - Duh - all YOU have to do when the spam gets too bad is to delete your yahoo address and create another. People that use throwaway addresses crack me up. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 06:05:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16CE216A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 06:05:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 482F343D48 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 06:05:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k0A67HP65142; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 22:07:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "jdow" , , "David Banning" Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 22:03:45 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <038301c6153c$7bb246e0$1225a8c0@kittycat> Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Spamcop listed - need help to diagnose why X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 06:05:17 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of jdow >Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 8:48 AM >To: danial_thom@yahoo.com; David Banning >Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: Spamcop listed - need help to diagnose why > > >Spam I sort through. With SpamAssassin scoring it's easy to find >the low scores and concentrate on them. But somebody arrogant enough >to spam me with a challenge for a message to a mailing list ends >up on my procmail /dev/null rules. (I use fetchmail to grab mail >and procmail to feed it to /var/spool/mail/ with stops along >the way for SpamAssassin, ClamAv, and some random cleverness.) > Unfortunately, jdow, since your using this setup, the spammer has already successfully delivered the mail to you. The fact that you delete the spam before reading makes no difference - the spammer doesen't know that and thinks they have successfully delivered it. Denying the spam before it's even accepted into the server is a much better way. Unfortunately, a content filter means you have to read in the DATA section of the message to get material to filter. However, there's been some experimental work done on content filter systems that will read in the message then simply stop issuing TCP acknowledgements before closing, and log IP and refuse further communication from it. The sender times out with a network failure, and thinks the message was never successfully delivered. Pretty ugly stuff, though, violates all sorts of application separation rules. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 06:10:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F7B816A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 06:10:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B150F43D45 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 06:10:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k0A6DxP65185; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 22:13:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: , Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 22:10:27 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <2417.209.87.176.132.1136833036.fusewebmail-19592@webmail.fusemail.com > Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: script to monitor internet connection X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 06:10:31 -0000 I thought it might be. You do realize, hopefully, that this problem most likely has absolutely nothing to do with your ISP, and if you were to change ISP's it would probably keep happening. I work for an ISP that is a DSL provider. If you supply the make and model of your DSL modem and whether your in ppp mode or not I might be able to give you some troubleshooting steps that would enable you to actually fix the problem. Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: Brian John [mailto:brianjohn@fusemail.com] >Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 10:57 AM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: RE: script to monitor internet connection > > >this is dsl. Sorry, I should have specified that in the beginning. >Periodically my dsl modem will lose it's signal, I want to see just how >often this is happening. > > >----- Original Message ----- > >> what is this, dsl, cable, dialup modem? >> >> Ted >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Brian John >> >Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 5:23 AM >> >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> >Subject: script to monitor internet connection >> > >> > >> >Hello, >> >I would like to write a script to monitor my internet >> >connection status. >> >My home connection goes down fairly often and I would like to >> >get an idea >> >for just how often it goes down and if possible how long it >> >goes down for. >> > Could someone help me write a script that will check my >> >connection to the >> >internet and log whenever it goes down and possibly how long it >> >goes down >> >for? I want to have some evidence to give to my ISP that my >> >connection is >> >going down. >> > >> >Thanks >> > >> >/Brian >> >_______________________________________________ >> >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > >> >-- >> >No virus found in this incoming message. >> >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >> >Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.15/223 - Release >> >Date: 1/6/2006 >> > >> >> >> > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.15/223 - Release >Date: 1/6/2006 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 06:17:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AE6316A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 06:17:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8FB743D46 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 06:17:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k0A6KoP65213; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 22:21:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: =?iso-8859-1?B?RXJ0YW4gS/zn/Gtv8Gx1?= , Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 22:17:18 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <20060109113214.M18250@ozlerplastik.com> Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: Compaq ProLiant 1600 server freezes when detecting keyboard X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 06:17:43 -0000 Please try booting with FreeBSD 4.11 and let us know if it works or not. (just download a boot floppy and use that) Also, it is probably hanging at whatever would probe up AFTER keyboard detection, not the keyboard detection. Be aware also that the Compaq 1600's are a bit odd in that they have a partial USB chipset on the motherboard. It is detected as a USB device - but althought the chip exists, a USB buss is not, in fact, connected to it. There is a setting in many Linux distros to disable USB probing at the installation boot to get around this, that is documented somewhere. Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Ertan Küçükoglu >Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 3:52 AM >To: questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Compaq ProLiant 1600 server freezes when detecting keyboard > > >Hello, > >I wanted to replace slackware 10.1 with freebsd 6.0-release. >Reason is the >improvements on filesystem handling in 6.0 release. My system >is serving as a >file server with samba. > >I downloaded CDs and boot to install. During device probing, >system hangs at >keyboard detection. Below is the output written manually: >----- >atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 >atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 >kbd0 at atkbd0 >stray irq13 >atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] >===> here cursor locks, keyboard locks. ctrl+alt+del does not work <=== >----- > >I searched the archives. It is suggested to change BIOS setting >for the OS to >"Other" for single CPU systems and to "UnixWare 2.1" for SMP >systems. Mine is >a SMP system. I tried several other OS settings in BIOS, >unfortunately nothing >helped. System bios update date is 11/8/2000. > >I tried to install 5.4-release and cvsup and upgrade to >6.0-stable. Same >problem with GENERIC kernel of yesterday sources. > >This system is a production machine and I have to fix it until >end of this >week. There is a temporary backup system running at the moment. > >If there is anything that I can provide, please ask for it and >I'll do my best >to provide. > >Regards, >-- >Ertan Küçükoðlu >ertank@ozlerplastik.com >Özler Plastik San. ve Tic. A.S. >Tel: +90.212.676.6767 >Fax: +90.212.676.8012 >(webmail) > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.15/223 - Release >Date: 1/6/2006 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 06:20:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAEAF16A420 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 06:20:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A19043D6D for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 06:20:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k0A6O3P65231; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 22:24:04 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Marc G. Fournier" , Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 22:20:31 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <20060110013448.R48499@ganymede.hub.org> Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: My new DL360 G4P just arrived ... is it Dual-Core? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 06:20:41 -0000 I think it means if you want the second dual core processor you have to order it from HP and install it. Kind of like a car that's sold with A/C but when you go to take delivery you find no AC and the salesman says "That's an add-on option that costs another $1000" Did you open the unit? Is there an empty socket? Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Marc >G. Fournier >Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 9:36 PM >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: My new DL360 G4P just arrived ... is it Dual-Core? > > > >'k, I'm a bit confused, since I didn't quite get what I was >looking for, but it >was what I ordered *sigh* And, in fact, might actually be what >I want without >realizing it ... > >basically, I wanted a Dual Xeon server ... got a Single one ... >looking at the >HP web site, though, I see: > >"Powerful HP ProLiant DL360 G4p is now available Dual-core >2.8GHz Intel Xeon >processors that offer 22MB L2 cache and 64-bit support." > >Does this mean that my CPUs *are* Dual-Core, or just that I can >order them that >way? Will Dual-Core show two processors in POST, or is it not >until I get >to the OS itself that I see both? > > > > >---- >Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.15/223 - Release Date: 1/6/2006 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 07:28:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A726616A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:28:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dennyboy@cableone.net) Received: from S1.cableone.net (s1.cableone.net [24.116.0.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 164C043D45 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:28:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dennyboy@cableone.net) Received: from badboybox.cableone.net (unverified [69.92.7.117]) by S1.cableone.net (CableOne SMTP Service S1) with ESMTP id 42585552 for multiple; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 00:29:19 -0700 Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 01:30:27 +0000 (UTC) From: Denny White To: "Michael W. Lucas" In-Reply-To: <20060109195342.GA35789@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> Message-ID: References: <20060109195342.GA35789@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> X-GPG-PUBLIC_KEY: http//wwwkeys.nl.pgp.net X-GPG-FINGERPRINT: D0A9 AD44 1F10 E09E 0E67 EC25 CB44 F2E5 1644 E79A MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-NotAscii: charset=us-ascii; X-IP-stats: Incoming Last 1, First 82, in=25, out=0, spam=0 X-External-IP: 69.92.7.117 X-Abuse-Info: Send abuse complaints to abuse@cableone.net Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: replacement for Acrobat Professional? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:28:51 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Jan 9 Michael W. Lucas contributed the following: > > Hi folks, > > I've been handed a whole bunch of PDFs and asked to make my comments > directly in them. I'm sure there's something in ports that can do > that, but my search hasn't turned up anything. (Of course, I really > have no idea what I'm looking for, which hampers the search. :-) > > Any suggestions on a replacement for or equivalent to Acrobat Pro? > > I'm on a -current box running i386. > > Thanks for any pointers, > > ==ml > > > -- > Michael W. Lucas mwlucas@FreeBSD.org, mwlucas@BlackHelicopters.org > http://www.BlackHelicopters.org/~mwlucas/ > > "The cloak of anonymity protects me from the nuisance of caring." -Non Sequitur > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Michael, Here are some links. Hope they help. Denny White http://www.accesspdf.com http://www.freebsdsoftware.org/print/flpsed.html http://pdfhacks.com/pdftk (don't overlook the Vim plugin part) Please do not CC me. Already subscribed to mailing list. GnuPG key : 0x1644E79A | http://wwwkeys.nl.pgp.net Fingerprint: D0A9 AD44 1F10 E09E 0E67 EC25 CB44 F2E5 1644 E79A -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (OpenBSD) iD8DBQFDww5Ny0Ty5RZE55oRAplfAJ9ekbutngwMe8KZgLhJhnaIORMK0ACgza2+ 2sqjq18VT5AK5Q3lqA5VG7I= =tszC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 07:36:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6798D16A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:36:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7D11D43D45 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:36:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2006 07:36:01 -0000 Received: from 63.62.79.83.cust.bluewin.ch (EHLO storage.mine.nu) [83.79.62.63] by mail.gmx.net (mp018) with SMTP; 10 Jan 2006 08:36:01 +0100 X-Authenticated: #912863 Received: from storage.mine.nu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by storage.mine.nu (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0A7Yqe2075265; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:34:53 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lars@storage.mine.nu) Received: (from lars@localhost) by storage.mine.nu (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k0A7YqTx075264; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:34:52 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lars) Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:34:51 +0100 From: lars To: "Marc G. Fournier" Message-ID: <20060110073451.GA75233@storage.mine.nu> References: <20060110013542.M48499@ganymede.hub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060110013542.M48499@ganymede.hub.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HP's iLO ... over SSH? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:36:04 -0000 "Marc G. Fournier" wrote: > > 'k, I figured out to go to the IP on the web to see the iLO interface, but, > how do you do SSH into the box? I see the configuration options through > iLO's interface, but: > > >ssh 192.168.1.105 > ssh: connect to host 192.168.1.105 port 22: Connection refused > > so, obviously I'm mis-understanding something? Is the "Remote KVM" > funcationality really only available through the Java based web interface? > :( > In the web interface go to Administration>>Global Settings. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 07:45:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2CE516A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:45:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thomas.butz@paradise.net.nz) Received: from linda-4.paradise.net.nz (bm-4a.paradise.net.nz [203.96.152.183]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52E7C43D49 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:45:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from thomas.butz@paradise.net.nz) Received: from smtp-2.paradise.net.nz (tclsnelb1-src-1.paradise.net.nz [203.96.152.172]) by linda-4.paradise.net.nz (Paradise.net.nz) with ESMTP id <0ISV00GRA9J0PX@linda-4.paradise.net.nz> for questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:45:00 +1300 (NZDT) Received: from box (210-246-30-149.paradise.net.nz [210.246.30.149]) by smtp-2.paradise.net.nz (Postfix) with SMTP id BA4624F209B for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:44:59 +1300 (NZDT) Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:01:26 +1300 From: Tom and Elke Butz To: questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <20060110200126.0b153c93.thomas.butz@paradise.net.nz> Organization: Tom Butz MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 0.9.3 (GTK+ 1.2.10; i686-pc-linux-gnu) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: USB-driver for iRiver H10 Player/Mass Storage under FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: thomas.butz@paradise.net.nz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:45:05 -0000 Hi there, I've spent quite a bit of time on FreeBSD 4.11 (after years of Linux), and must admit: it's one of the best/fastest/safest/best-documented systems around. It actaully supports my Maxium memory-stick with built-in MP3-player without a hitch, but I can't get the iRiver connected. It gets recognised, but then everything stalls. And I haven't read of any viruses getting into its UFS-filesystem. To give you an idea: Damn Small Linux (2.4.22) supports it, and so does Trinux (2.4.26). For safety and other reasons I'd like to have everything running under FreeBSD 4.11, so that's why I'm so keen on getting the iRiver connected. BTW, Windows 98SE supports the Maxium memory-stick, but not the iRiver (needs XP). Thanks for your help, Tom Butz, New Zealand. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 07:56:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4143616A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:56:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA8643D49 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:56:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id l1so4167179nzf for ; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 23:56:32 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=RM3K1QrrEkkpnRO0Lu/tuDMGP3QTGvEubXdgC2cg/uFZpQOPjXMjuuu58vkLmjXgqsXzcF9PA8DFuE4V+cTB1pNkawGGCh4db4NgUjCI8k1HVuuOz17IK03nap8IqlygMp0DgNQ+UiiVHhUi77cqcVi7z9IjEdLxTYhM7CP3EIg= Received: by 10.36.77.15 with SMTP id z15mr134119nza; Mon, 09 Jan 2006 23:56:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.20.67 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 23:56:31 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:56:31 +0300 From: "Andrew P." To: shih@math.jussieu.fr In-Reply-To: <20060109125228.GG24383@math.jussieu.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060106161324.GS24383@math.jussieu.fr> <20060109125228.GG24383@math.jussieu.fr> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Ted Mittelstaedt Subject: Re: FreeBSD on DL145G2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:56:33 -0000 On 1/9/06, Albert Shih wrote: > Le 07/01/2006 =E0 20:36:48-0800, Ted Mittelstaedt a =E9crit > > > > Since these are new you need to return them to HP and exchange for > > a different server, or get your money back. > > Good answer...... > > It's the f@!(*)# builder to forget put a scsi-terminator..... > > Lots of thanks... If you're running FreeBSD/amd64, please report working SCSI on this platform for inclusion in this list: http://www.freebsd.org/platforms/amd64/motherboards.html You can do so via send-pr or webform. Attach your dmesg output, please. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 08:02:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 578AD16A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:02:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sdb@ssr.com) Received: from mailhost.ssr.com (ns.ssr.com [199.4.235.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0919343D46 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:02:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sdb@ssr.com) Received: (qmail 67518 invoked by uid 103); 10 Jan 2006 09:01:30 -0000 Date: 10 Jan 2006 09:01:30 -0000 Message-ID: <20060110090130.67517.qmail@ssr.com> From: Scott Ballantyne To: questions@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: System time suddenly changed after reboot. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:02:20 -0000 Running 5.3-RELEASE. After many years of using FreeBSD, and as many reboots or more, I had occasion to reboot today, and a few hours later discovered to my horror that the system time had suddenly been moved ahead to the year 2020! I did the best I could with the resulting mess, but I am curious if anyone else has seen this, or what would cause it. This is the same hardware I have been running for a couple of years now, and I haven't changed anything in the bios or system. Thanks, Scott -- sdb@ssr.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 08:14:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24E8A16A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:14:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ertank@ozlerplastik.com) Received: from ozlerplastik.com (ozlerplastik.com [212.58.25.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF4C443D45 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:14:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ertank@ozlerplastik.com) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by ozlerplastik.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D75ADA6ED4; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:14:52 +0200 (EET) Received: from ozlerplastik.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ozlerplastik.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 81550-07; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:14:50 +0200 (EET) Received: from www.ozlerplastik.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by ozlerplastik.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68CFBA6ECB; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:14:50 +0200 (EET) From: "=?ISO-8859-9?Q?Ertan_K=FC=E7=FCko=F0lu?=" To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" , Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:14:50 +0200 Message-Id: <20060110081037.M29590@ozlerplastik.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20060109113214.M18250@ozlerplastik.com> X-Mailer: Open WebMail 2.51 20050228 X-OriginatingIP: 85.96.241.182 (ertank) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-9 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ozlerplastik.com Cc: Subject: RE: Compaq ProLiant 1600 server freezes when detecting keyboard X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:14:59 -0000 I'll appreciate if anyone directly sends me, or gives me a working link to download 4.11 release boot images. ftp://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-Archive/old-releases/ is not working. At least, connection is established, but no login info asked. Btw, this box is 5.4-release setup box. I cvsuped 6.0-stable sources. I may try to disable USB in GENERIC kernel. Re-compile and try with this kernel if this is the test that should be done. I'll give this a try while waiting for a working link for FreeBSD 4.11. --Ertan On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 22:17:18 -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote > Please try booting with FreeBSD 4.11 and let us know if it works > or not. (just download a boot floppy and use that) Also, it is > probably hanging at whatever would probe up AFTER keyboard detection, > not the keyboard detection. > > Be aware also that the Compaq 1600's are a bit odd in that they have > a partial USB chipset on the motherboard. It is detected as a USB > device - but althought the chip exists, a USB buss is not, in fact, > connected to it. There is a setting in many Linux distros to disable > USB probing at the installation boot to get around this, that is > documented somewhere. > > Ted > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Ertan Küçükoglu > >Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 3:52 AM > >To: questions@freebsd.org > >Subject: Compaq ProLiant 1600 server freezes when detecting keyboard > > > > > >Hello, > > > >I wanted to replace slackware 10.1 with freebsd 6.0-release. > >Reason is the > >improvements on filesystem handling in 6.0 release. My system > >is serving as a > >file server with samba. > > > >I downloaded CDs and boot to install. During device probing, > >system hangs at > >keyboard detection. Below is the output written manually: > >----- > >atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 > >atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 > >kbd0 at atkbd0 > >stray irq13 > >atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > >===> here cursor locks, keyboard locks. ctrl+alt+del does not work <=== > >----- > > > >I searched the archives. It is suggested to change BIOS setting > >for the OS to > >"Other" for single CPU systems and to "UnixWare 2.1" for SMP > >systems. Mine is > >a SMP system. I tried several other OS settings in BIOS, > >unfortunately nothing > >helped. System bios update date is 11/8/2000. > > > >I tried to install 5.4-release and cvsup and upgrade to > >6.0-stable. Same > >problem with GENERIC kernel of yesterday sources. > > > >This system is a production machine and I have to fix it until > >end of this > >week. There is a temporary backup system running at the moment. > > > >If there is anything that I can provide, please ask for it and > >I'll do my best > >to provide. > > > >Regards, > >-- > >Ertan Küçükoðlu > >ertank@ozlerplastik.com > >Özler Plastik San. ve Tic. A.S. > >Tel: +90.212.676.6767 > >Fax: +90.212.676.8012 > >(webmail) > > > >_______________________________________________ > >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > >-- > >No virus found in this incoming message. > >Checked by AVG Free Edition. > >Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.15/223 - Release > >Date: 1/6/2006 > > -- Ertan Küçükoðlu ertank@ozlerplastik.com Özler Plastik San. ve Tic. A.S. Tel: +90.212.676.6767 Fax: +90.212.676.8012 Mob: +90.533.226.0051 (webmail) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 08:29:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17BBF16A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:29:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from "cyb."@gmx.net) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.de [213.165.64.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4201543D45 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:29:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from "cyb."@gmx.net) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 10 Jan 2006 08:29:30 -0000 Received: from pD952C0C2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (EHLO p4-3200.local) [217.82.192.194] by mail.gmx.net (mp022) with SMTP; 10 Jan 2006 09:29:30 +0100 X-Authenticated: #4870692 From: Andreas Rudisch To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060110090130.67517.qmail@ssr.com> References: <20060110090130.67517.qmail@ssr.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-6aCqn4qdRXulG3vcVY+A" Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:29:28 +0100 Message-Id: <1136881768.591.1.camel@p4-3200.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: Subject: Re: System time suddenly changed after reboot. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:29:33 -0000 --=-6aCqn4qdRXulG3vcVY+A Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 09:01 +0000, Scott Ballantyne wrote: > Running 5.3-RELEASE. >=20 > After many years of using FreeBSD, and as many reboots or more, I had > occasion to reboot today, and a few hours later discovered to my > horror that the system time had suddenly been moved ahead to the year > 2020! >=20 > I did the best I could with the resulting mess, but I am curious if > anyone else has seen this, or what would cause it. This is the same > hardware I have been running for a couple of years now, and I haven't > changed anything in the bios or system. >=20 > Thanks, > Scott Just an idea, but maybe the BIOS battery ran out of power and needs to be replaced. Andreas --=20 GnuPG key : 0x2A573565 | http://cyb.websimplex.de/pubkey.asc Fingerprint: 925D 2089 0BF9 8DE5 9166 33BB F0FD CD37 2A57 3565 --=-6aCqn4qdRXulG3vcVY+A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDw3Bo8P3NNypXNWURAkCVAKCmK09dGsRuOqlBtvt0wOtehrCnsACgjbQL vAio9w4PidZAAzhS/lvpnGA= =OFqh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-6aCqn4qdRXulG3vcVY+A-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 09:23:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4172516A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:23:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ivan.roth@free.fr) Received: from smtp6-g19.free.fr (smtp6-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BDC643D5A for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:23:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ivan.roth@free.fr) Received: from imp3-g19.free.fr (imp3-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.3]) by smtp6-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F18017F54; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:23:25 +0100 (CET) Received: by imp3-g19.free.fr (Postfix, from userid 33) id 5E09454180; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:23:24 +0100 (MET) Received: from LAubervilliers-151-13-68-7.w217-128.abo.wanadoo.fr (LAubervilliers-151-13-68-7.w217-128.abo.wanadoo.fr [217.128.42.7]) by imp4.free.fr (Horde) with HTTP for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:23:24 +0100 Message-ID: <20060110102324.sfh5jbzzreskwc8w@imp4.free.fr> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:23:24 +0100 From: ivan.roth@free.fr To: gandalf@messias.qhigh.com References: <43C03ED4.1070404@messias.qhigh.com> <20060110055157.GC15566@andvari.ath.cx> In-Reply-To: <20060110055157.GC15566@andvari.ath.cx> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xorg - how to disable some video modes? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:23:27 -0000 Quoting Martin M=F6ller : > * User Gandalf [07-01-2006 23:21:08 +0100]: > >> section. But I was not able to disable 1920x1440, 1600x1200 and >> 1280x1024. What I do know is that I go to the control panel of xfce each >> time and switch back to 1024x768 manually. > > Take a look in which "SubSection" you make the changes... If you prefer > 24 bit colour, set the mode like this, and don't forget to add the line > with "DefaultDepth", so X knows in which colour mode you want to start. > > Section "Screen" > Identifier "Screen0" > DefaultDepth 24 > Device "Card0" > Monitor "Monitor0" > SubSection "Display" > Viewport 0 0 > Depth 24 > Modes "1024x768" > EndSubSection > EndSection > > Regards, > Martin > > -- > Martin Moeller > > _______________________________________________ Referring to http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?t=3D381= 412 (for example), you should be able to add a "DefaultDepth 24" line in your screen section, with your Modes listed as Martin said. Of course, this is useful only if you have more than one mode listed in your xorg.conf. Regards, Ivan. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 09:28:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 001BC16A420 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:28:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gandalf@messias.qhigh.com) Received: from smtp.enternet.hu (smtp.enternet.hu [62.112.192.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D807243D46 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:28:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gandalf@messias.qhigh.com) Received: from [62.68.174.65] (helo=[172.16.0.26]) by smtp.enternet.hu with esmtpa (Exim 4) id 1EwFnu-0000Vy-WE for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:28:35 +0100 Message-ID: <43C0DB6E.4060801@messias.qhigh.com> Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 10:29:18 +0100 From: gandalf User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <43C03ED4.1070404@messias.qhigh.com> <20060110055157.GC15566@andvari.ath.cx> <20060110102324.sfh5jbzzreskwc8w@imp4.free.fr> In-Reply-To: <20060110102324.sfh5jbzzreskwc8w@imp4.free.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Xorg - how to disable some video modes? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:28:42 -0000 > > Referring to > http://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/showthread.php?t=381412 > (for example), you should be able to add a "DefaultDepth 24" line in your > screen section, with your Modes listed as Martin said. Of course, this is > useful only if you have more than one mode listed in your xorg.conf. I only have one mode listed, and I have DefaultDepth. But when I start the X server, it starts in 1900x1440. I can attach my xorg.conf file, if it helps. Thank you Les From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 09:35:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 198C816A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:35:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andvari@gmx.de) Received: from smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (smtprelay02.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.14]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15C8343D45 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:35:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andvari@gmx.de) Received: (qmail 25821 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2006 09:35:01 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO andvari.ath.cx) ([pbs]750710@[84.168.101.240]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay02.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP for ; 10 Jan 2006 09:35:01 -0000 Received: from andvari.ath.cx (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by andvari.ath.cx (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0A9YvgF034997 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:34:58 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from andvari@gmx.de) Received: (from mm@localhost) by andvari.ath.cx (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k0A9YtJp034996 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:34:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from andvari@gmx.de) X-Authentication-Warning: andvari.ath.cx: mm set sender to andvari@gmx.de using -f Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:34:54 +0100 From: Martin =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=F6ller?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060110093454.GA16603@andvari.ath.cx> References: <43C03ED4.1070404@messias.qhigh.com> <20060110055157.GC15566@andvari.ath.cx> <20060110102324.sfh5jbzzreskwc8w@imp4.free.fr> <43C0DB6E.4060801@messias.qhigh.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43C0DB6E.4060801@messias.qhigh.com> X-URL: http://www.andvari.de/ X-PGP: Download public key from http://www.pb-mm.de/pgp X-Phone: +49 (0) 6126 58 38 36 X-Fax: +49 (0) 6126 58 45 78 X-Mobile: +49 (0) 1638 696 595 X-Location: Idstein, Hessen, Deutschland, Europa X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6 (RELENG_6) X-Accept-Language: de en X-Uptime: 3:48 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Subject: Re: Xorg - how to disable some video modes? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:35:04 -0000 * gandalf [08-01-2006 10:29:18 +0100]: > I can attach my xorg.conf file, if it helps. Yes, that would help indeed. -- Martin Moeller From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 09:40:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B05016A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:40:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0048043D45 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:40:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k0A9hbP65935; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 01:43:48 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: =?iso-8859-1?B?RXJ0YW4gS/zn/Gtv8Gx1?= , Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 01:40:05 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <20060110081037.M29590@ozlerplastik.com> Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: Compaq ProLiant 1600 server freezes when detecting keyboard X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:40:21 -0000 ftp://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-Archive/old-releases/i386/4.11- RELEASE/floppies/ works here with Microsoft Internet Exploder 6.0 Try setting your FTP client to passive mode. Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: Ertan Küçükoglu [mailto:ertank@ozlerplastik.com] >Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 12:15 AM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt; questions@freebsd.org >Subject: RE: Compaq ProLiant 1600 server freezes when detecting keyboard > > >I'll appreciate if anyone directly sends me, or gives me a >working link to >download 4.11 release boot images. > >ftp://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-Archive/old-releases/ > >is not working. At least, connection is established, but no >login info asked. > >Btw, this box is 5.4-release setup box. I cvsuped 6.0-stable >sources. I may >try to disable USB in GENERIC kernel. Re-compile and try with >this kernel if >this is the test that should be done. I'll give this a try >while waiting for a >working link for FreeBSD 4.11. > >--Ertan > >On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 22:17:18 -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote >> Please try booting with FreeBSD 4.11 and let us know if it works >> or not. (just download a boot floppy and use that) Also, it is >> probably hanging at whatever would probe up AFTER keyboard detection, >> not the keyboard detection. >> >> Be aware also that the Compaq 1600's are a bit odd in that they have >> a partial USB chipset on the motherboard. It is detected as a USB >> device - but althought the chip exists, a USB buss is not, in fact, >> connected to it. There is a setting in many Linux distros to disable >> USB probing at the installation boot to get around this, that is >> documented somewhere. >> >> Ted >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of >Ertan Küçükoglu >> >Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 3:52 AM >> >To: questions@freebsd.org >> >Subject: Compaq ProLiant 1600 server freezes when detecting keyboard >> > >> > >> >Hello, >> > >> >I wanted to replace slackware 10.1 with freebsd 6.0-release. >> >Reason is the >> >improvements on filesystem handling in 6.0 release. My system >> >is serving as a >> >file server with samba. >> > >> >I downloaded CDs and boot to install. During device probing, >> >system hangs at >> >keyboard detection. Below is the output written manually: >> >----- >> >atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 >> >atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 >> >kbd0 at atkbd0 >> >stray irq13 >> >atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] >> >===> here cursor locks, keyboard locks. ctrl+alt+del does >not work <=== >> >----- >> > >> >I searched the archives. It is suggested to change BIOS setting >> >for the OS to >> >"Other" for single CPU systems and to "UnixWare 2.1" for SMP >> >systems. Mine is >> >a SMP system. I tried several other OS settings in BIOS, >> >unfortunately nothing >> >helped. System bios update date is 11/8/2000. >> > >> >I tried to install 5.4-release and cvsup and upgrade to >> >6.0-stable. Same >> >problem with GENERIC kernel of yesterday sources. >> > >> >This system is a production machine and I have to fix it until >> >end of this >> >week. There is a temporary backup system running at the moment. >> > >> >If there is anything that I can provide, please ask for it and >> >I'll do my best >> >to provide. >> > >> >Regards, >> >-- >> >Ertan Küçükoðlu >> >ertank@ozlerplastik.com >> >Özler Plastik San. ve Tic. A.S. >> >Tel: +90.212.676.6767 >> >Fax: +90.212.676.8012 >> >(webmail) >> > >> >_______________________________________________ >> >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > >> >-- >> >No virus found in this incoming message. >> >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >> >Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.15/223 - Release >> >Date: 1/6/2006 >> > > > >-- >Ertan Küçükoðlu >ertank@ozlerplastik.com >Özler Plastik San. ve Tic. A.S. >Tel: +90.212.676.6767 >Fax: +90.212.676.8012 >Mob: +90.533.226.0051 >(webmail) > > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.15/223 - Release >Date: 1/6/2006 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 09:56:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8ED4E16A420 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:56:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from c-boulard@laposte.net) Received: from mx.laposte.net (mx.laposte.net [81.255.54.11]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8329A43D58 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:56:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from c-boulard@laposte.net) Received: from laposte.net (127.0.0.1) by mx.laposte.net (7.2.060.1) id 43839F4302981654 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:56:44 +0100 Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:56:44 +0100 Message-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Sensitivity: 3 From: "c-boulard" To: "freebsd-questions" X-XaM3-API-Version: 4.1 (B103) X-SenderIP: 127.0.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: freebsd technology + mail + php.ini X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:56:47 -0000 Hi, I'm a "disabled" noob and have an obsessing problem about the freebsd tec= hnology this is why I allow myself to address this message to you. I don= 't find any resource about this topic on the web, may be too particular..= .If you want to help me about the following problem : What shall i modify in my php.ini to send a message through a windows ser= ver exchange from an hosting freebsd server ? (i guess your comments but = these are the pre-necessaries of my customer) HELP ! (Thanks in all the cases) Sincerely, CB Ps : Happy New Year ^^=0A=0AAcc=E9dez au courrier =E9lectronique de La Po= ste : www.laposte.net ; =0A3615 LAPOSTENET (0,34 =80/mn) ; t=E9l : 08 92 = 68 13 50 (0,34=80/mn)=0A=0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 10:11:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D416B16A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:11:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jdow@earthlink.net) Received: from smtpauth01.mail.atl.earthlink.net (smtpauth01.mail.atl.earthlink.net [209.86.89.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC8C43D45 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:11:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jdow@earthlink.net) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=eeij2FfCvnf0eOwm0oJ3TDF1cmSJtjR4lpEkDb9cUGnvfoN1pMfTD/oFukJmstIp; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [71.116.149.244] (helo=kittycat) by smtpauth01.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EwGTq-00040w-8X for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:11:54 -0500 Message-ID: <04a601c615ce$4dc4d7b0$1225a8c0@kittycat> From: "jdow" To: References: Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 02:12:03 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 X-ELNK-Trace: bb89ecdb26a8f9f24d2b10475b571120d946e384bfc0e9a4bc182732116fb413d77640a2ff395bdd350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 71.116.149.244 Subject: Re: Spamcop listed - need help to diagnose why X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:11:56 -0000 From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" >>-----Original Message----- >>From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> >>Spam I sort through. With SpamAssassin scoring it's easy to find >>the low scores and concentrate on them. But somebody arrogant enough >>to spam me with a challenge for a message to a mailing list ends >>up on my procmail /dev/null rules. (I use fetchmail to grab mail >>and procmail to feed it to /var/spool/mail/ with stops along >>the way for SpamAssassin, ClamAv, and some random cleverness.) >> > > Unfortunately, jdow, since your using this setup, the spammer has > already successfully delivered the mail to you. The fact that you > delete the spam before reading makes no difference - the spammer > doesen't know that and thinks they have successfully delivered it. No they have not. They've managed to get it onto my machine, transiently. It never got delivered to ME, the organic unit here at this email address. I do vet spam. The items redirected to /dev/null are items I do not want to bother with while vetting real spam. > Denying the spam before it's even accepted into the server is a > much better way. Unfortunately, a content filter means you have to If you can make fetchmail do that you're pretty clever, kemo sabe. {^_^} From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 10:15:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9826516A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:15:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3308243D45 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:15:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Jan.Grant@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.16.62]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1EwGXU-0003s8-FR; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:15:53 +0000 Received: from cmjg (helo=localhost) by mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EwGXT-0004iA-K6; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:15:39 +0000 Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:15:39 +0000 (GMT) From: Jan Grant X-X-Sender: cmjg@mail.ilrt.bris.ac.uk To: Frank Staals In-Reply-To: <43C2C59A.6020906@gmx.net> Message-ID: References: <43C2BE4A.4070601@gmx.net> <20060109195427.GC89638@dan.emsphone.com> <43C2C59A.6020906@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: Jan Grant X-Spam-Score: -1.4 X-Spam-Level: - Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Shellscript syntax question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:15:55 -0000 On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Frank Staals wrote: > About the asteriks : No they weren't but for some reason Thunderbird had > problems with the color remaining from the KATE Syntax-hilighting. Anyway: > thanks for the solusion, but what would be the expressions for ">" "less or > equal" and "greater or equal" ? As others have pointed out: [ is a synonym for test(1), which uses -gt, -ge, -eq, -ne, -lt, -le for numeric comparisons. For string comparisons, it uses <, !=, =, and >. Your original expression didn't work because "<" is also a shell meta-character used to indicate file redirection. To get something like that to work, you'd need to quote it somehow: if [ "$a" \< "$b" ]; then ... ; fi or if [ "$a" '<' "$b" ]; then ... ; fi -- jan grant, ISYS, University of Bristol. http://www.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44 (0)117 3317661 http://ioctl.org/jan/ I'm the dandy information superhighwayman. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 10:16:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1D6216A439; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:16:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@skyhawk.ca) Received: from smtp-05.primus.ca (mail.tor.primus.ca [216.254.136.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DF9343D45; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:16:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@skyhawk.ca) Received: from [216.86.117.32] (helo=mail.skyhawk.ca) by smtp-05.primus.ca with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.50) id 1EwGXw-0004AS-IE; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:16:09 -0500 Received: from [192.168.1.20] (seinar.skyhawk.ca [192.168.1.20]) by mail.skyhawk.ca with esmtp; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 03:21:05 +0000 id 00001996.43C32821.00000D1E Message-ID: <43C3896A.7090704@skyhawk.ca> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 02:16:10 -0800 From: Andrew Fremantle User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Advanced IPFW2 Forward rule problem / bug / misunderstanding X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:16:12 -0000 Hello, I have searched the lists for information pertaining to this problem, but I haven't been able to find anything relevant to my attempted usage of IPFWs "forward" action. If there are any preexisting threads that address my concern, please direct me to them. I have also sent this message to the freebsd-ipfw list, as this seems consistent with some other threads I see in their archive. Here's the situation : I have two ISPs, each providing two IPs. One of these ISPs is providing IPs on totally different subnets, and is MAC sensitive. I have two internal servers (Actually, just one listening on two addresses), and I want this server to be available externally to both ISPs. (We're migrating ISPs, and we don't want any interruption in service). I am using port forwarding in NATd to allow the necessary ports through to the server. My problem comes with the replies - FreeBSD has only one default gateway, and all traffic going out, regardless of which external IP address it is from, goes to that gateway. Since ISP2 doesen't care much for routing traffic from ISP1, and vice-versa, I have a problem. I should note here that I am not trying to load balance - I am perfectly happy with all outbound LAN connections being NATted over one link, I just need the ability to service inbound connections on all four IPs. I am using forward rules in my firewall to match packets belonging to these other interfaces, to forward them to the appropriate gateway. According to the manpage for ipfw, "If /ipaddr/ is not a local address, then the port number (if specified) is ignored, and the packet will be forwarded to the remote address, using the route as found in the local routing table for that IP." I interpret that as "The packet's next hop will be compared to the routing table, and routed out the appropriate interface to reach that next hop". The problem is that doesen't seem to be happening. I have tried fiddling a few knobs to no effect - specifically net.inet.ip.fastforwarding, net.inet.ip.sourceroute and net.inet.ip.accept_sourceroute. Telus is the "legacy" ISP, so when I'm trying these rules all the inbound server requests are from the two Telus interfaces. I have numbered a rule here "42000". This rule will catch all kinds of packets outbound from ${ext1_ip}:80 and ${ext1_ip}:443 to clients on the internet. This tells me my inbound NAT translation is working, the packets are getting to the server, replies are coming back, they're matching my forward rules, but still going out the wrong interface anyways! As attached as I am to the idea of doing this via ipfw, if anyone has any suggestions on alternate methods to achieve the same results, I'd love to hear them!!! On to the technical details - I have obscured IP addresses here, but the networks and subnet masks remain the same ------------------------------------------- bsdbox# uname -a FreeBSD bsdbox 6.0-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE-p1 #1: Mon Jan 9 08:15:08 PST 2006 root@bsdbox:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BSDBOX i386 ------------------------------------------- bsdbox# cat /usr/src/sys/i386/conf/BSDBOX . . . ### FIREWALLING options IPFIREWALL options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD_EXTENDED ( I just did this to test - it made no difference) options IPDIVERT ------------------------------------------- bsdbox# cat /etc/rc.conf . . . ########## ## Networking ########## gateway_enable="YES" ## Ensure interface configuration and Firewall script remain consistent!! defaultrouter="24.85.92.1" ifconfig_rl0="192.168.1.1" ifconfig_vr0="142.179.109.xxx netmask 255.255.248.0" ifconfig_vr1="216.232.85.xxx netmask 255.255.254.0" ifconfig_rue0="24.85.9x.xxx netmask 255.255.252.0" ifconfig_rue0_alias0="24.85.9x.xxx netmask 255.255.255.255" natd_enable="NO" firewall_enable="YES" firewall_script="/usr/local/etc/firewall.telus+shaw-test" ------------------------------------------------- bsdbox# cat /usr/local/etc/firewall.telus+shaw-test ##### firewall.telus+shaw 0.9.8 # Aquire variables from /etc/rc.conf if [ -r /etc/rc.conf ]; then . /etc/rc.conf fi fwcmd="/sbin/ipfw -q" ########## ## THIS SCRIPT REQUIRES THE FOLLOWING VARIABLES ## TO BE CORRECTLY DEFINED! ########## ########## # PRIMARY external interface (Telus) ext1="vr0" # Device name ext1_ip="142.179.109.xxx" # IP Address ext1_gw="142.179.104.254" # IP Gateway ext1_bc="142.179.111.255" # Broadcast Address ext1_srv="192.168.1.10" # Server IP Address ########## ########## # SECONDARY external interface (Telus) ext2="vr1" # Device name ext2_ip="216.232.85.xxx" # IP Address ext2_nm="255.255.254.0" # Network Mask ext2_bc="216.232.85.255" # Broadcast Address ext2_gw="216.232.84.254" # IP Gateway ext2_srv="192.168.1.11" # IP Address of internal server ########## ########## # Shaw Cable Interface(s) # PRIMARY IP shaw="rue0" # Device Name shaw_ip="24.85.93.xxx" # IP Address shaw_nm="255.255.252.0" # Network Mask shaw_bc="24.85.95.255" # Broadcast Address shaw_gw="24.85.92.1" # IP Gateway srv1_int="192.168.1.10" # Internal IP of server srv1_ext="24.85.93.xxx" # External IP of server (Same as ${shaw_ip}) # SECONDARY IP srv2_int="192.168.1.11" # Internal IP of server srv2_ext="24.85.93.xxx" # External IP of server ########## ########## # INTERNAL interface int="rl0" # Device name int_ip="192.168.1.1" # IP Address int_nm="255.255.255.0" # Network Mask int_bc="192.168.1.255" # Broadcast Address ########## ## I have to handle NATd manually from this script because it's got ## too many connection specific options. nat_in="8667" nat_out="8669" ## Kill any running instance if [ -r /var/run/natd.pid ]; then kill -9 `cat /var/run/natd.pid` sleep 1 fi # And run our new NATd /sbin/natd -log_ipfw_denied -i ${nat_in} -o ${nat_out} -s -m -u -n ${shaw} -punch_fw 36000:100 -redirect_port tcp ${ext1_srv}:22 ${ext1_ip}:xxxx -redirect_port tcp ${ext1_srv}:53 ${ext1_ip}:53 -redirect_port tcp ${ext1_srv}:80 ${ext1_ip}:80 -redirect_port tcp ${ext1_srv}:443 ${ext1_ip}:443 -redirect_port udp ${ext1_srv}:53 ${ext1_ip}:53 -redirect_port tcp ${ext2_srv}:80 ${ext2_ip}:80 -redirect_port tcp ${ext2_srv}:443 ${ext2_ip}:443 -redirect_port tcp ${srv1_int}:22 ${shaw_ip}:xxxx -redirect_port tcp ${srv1_int}:53 ${shaw_ip}:53 -redirect_port udp ${srv1_int}:53 ${shaw_ip}:53 -redirect_port tcp ${srv1_int}:80 ${shaw_ip}:80 -redirect_port tcp ${srv1_int}:443 ${shaw_ip}:443 -redirect_port tcp ${srv2_int}:80 ${srv2_ext}:80 -redirect_port tcp ${srv2_int}:443 ${srv2_ext}:443 # Blow away the existing firewall ruleset ${fwcmd} flush ########## # Now I start defining rules to handle traffic ########## # Divide and Conquer based on interface and direction ## Inbound Internal ${fwcmd} add 0500 skipto 5000 all from any to any in recv ${int} ## Outbound Internal ${fwcmd} add skipto 10000 all from any to any out xmit ${int} # Inbound Primary External (Telus) ${fwcmd} add skipto 15000 all from any to any in recv ${ext1} # Outbound Primary External (Telus) ${fwcmd} add skipto 20000 all from any to any out xmit ${ext1} # Inbound Secondary External (Telus) ${fwcmd} add skipto 25000 all from any to any in recv ${ext2} # Outbound Secondary External (Telus) ${fwcmd} add skipto 30000 all from any to any out xmit ${ext2} # Inbound Shaw ${fwcmd} add skipto 35000 all from any to any in recv ${shaw} # Outbound Shaw ${fwcmd} add skipto 40000 all from any to any out xmit ${shaw} # Local Loopback ${fwcmd} add allow all from any to any via lo0 # If I still haven't matched it, it's a damn weirdo. Drop it. ${fwcmd} add reset all from any to any ### ***************** ### Inbound Internal Traffic ### ***************** # Drop all packets not originating on my network ${fwcmd} add 5000 drop all from not ${int_ip}:${int_nm} to any // Inbound Internal # Skip the next rule for all packets destined to the firewall itself ( & Broadcast ) ${fwcmd} add 5010 skipto 5040 all from any to \( ${int_ip} or ${int_bc} \) # Drop all packets destined to my internal network ${fwcmd} add 5020 drop all from any to ${int_ip}:${int_nm} # Allow existing conversations, and new ICMP and SSH connections ${fwcmd} add 5040 check-state ${fwcmd} add allow icmp from any to \( ${int_ip} or ${int_bc} \) keep-state ${fwcmd} add allow tcp from any to ${int_ip} 22 setup keep-state # Pass packets to NATd for possible translation ${fwcmd} add divert ${nat_out} all from any to any # Redirect to gateway for ext1 if it's an existing connection on ext1 ${fwcmd} add forward ${ext1_gw} all from ${ext1_ip} to any # Redirect to gateway for ext2 if it's an existing connection on ext2 ${fwcmd} add forward ${ext2_gw} all from ${ext2_ip} to any # Allow all packets adjusted by NATd ${fwcmd} add allow ip from \( ${shaw_ip} or ${srv2_ext} \) to any # Reject this packet ${fwcmd} add reset log all from any to any ### ***************** ### Outbound Internal Traffic ### ***************** # Allow Existing Conversations ${fwcmd} add 10000 check-state // Outbound Internal # Allow me to start ICMP, SSH and DNS sessions ${fwcmd} add allow icmp from ${int_ip} to ${int_ip}:${int_nm} keep-state ${fwcmd} add allow tcp from ${int_ip} to ${int_ip}:${int_nm} 22 keep-state ${fwcmd} add allow udp from ${int_ip} to ${srv1_int} 53 keep-state # Allow NATd translated traffic through ${fwcmd} add allow all from not ${int_ip}:${int_nm} to ${int_ip}:${int_nm} # Reject this packet ${fwcmd} add reset log all from any to any ### ***************** ### Inbound External (primary) Traffic ### ***************** # Ensure this packet did not originate from a private network ${fwcmd} add 15000 drop all from 192.168.0.0/16 to any // Inbound Telus Primary ${fwcmd} add 15020 drop all from 172.16.0.0/12 to any ${fwcmd} add 15030 drop all from 10.0.0.0/8 to any ${fwcmd} add 15040 drop all from 127.0.0.0/8 to any ${fwcmd} add 15050 drop all from 0.0.0.0/8 to any ${fwcmd} add 15060 drop all from 169.254.0.0/16 to any ${fwcmd} add 15070 drop all from 192.0.2.0/24 to any ${fwcmd} add 15080 drop all from 204.152.64.0/23 to any ${fwcmd} add 15090 drop all from 224.0.0.0/3 to any # Drop the packet if it's not broadcast or destined to us ${fwcmd} add 15500 skipto 15600 all from any to \( ${ext1_ip} or ${ext1_bc} \) ${fwcmd} add 15520 deny all from any to any # Pass to NATd for possible reverse-translation ${fwcmd} add 15600 divert ${nat_in} all from any to any # Pass anything NATd has translated ${fwcmd} add allow all from any to ${int_ip}:${int_nm} # Drop whatever's left ${fwcmd} add deny all from any to any ### ***************** ### Outbound External (primary) Traffic ### ***************** # Deny all traffic to private nets ${fwcmd} add 20000 drop all from any to 192.168.0.0/16 // Outbound Telus Primary ${fwcmd} add drop all from any to 172.16.0.0/12 ${fwcmd} add drop all from any to 10.0.0.0/8 ${fwcmd} add drop all from any to 127.0.0.0/8 ${fwcmd} add drop all from any to 0.0.0.0/8 ${fwcmd} add drop all from any to 169.254.0.0/16 ${fwcmd} add drop all from any to 192.0.2.0/24 ${fwcmd} add drop all from any to 204.152.64.0/23 ${fwcmd} add drop all from any to 224.0.0.0/3 # Allow outbound traffic from this machine (NATd translated) ${fwcmd} add allow all from ${ext1_ip} to any # Drop whatever's left ${fwcmd} add deny all from any to any ### ***************** ### Inbound External (secondary) Traffic ### ***************** # Ensure this packet did not originate from a private network ${fwcmd} add 25000 drop all from 192.168.0.0/16 to any // Inbound Telus Secondary ${fwcmd} add 25020 drop all from 172.16.0.0/12 to any ${fwcmd} add 25030 drop all from 10.0.0.0/8 to any ${fwcmd} add 25040 drop all from 127.0.0.0/8 to any ${fwcmd} add 25050 drop all from 0.0.0.0/8 to any ${fwcmd} add 25060 drop all from 169.254.0.0/16 to any ${fwcmd} add 25070 drop all from 192.0.2.0/24 to any ${fwcmd} add 25080 drop all from 204.152.64.0/23 to any ${fwcmd} add 25090 drop all from 224.0.0.0/3 to any # Drop the packet if it's not broadcast or destined to us ${fwcmd} add 25100 skipto 25500 all from any to \( ${ext2_ip} or ${ext2_bc} \) ${fwcmd} add 25120 deny all from any to any # Pass to NATd for possible reverse-translation ${fwcmd} add 25500 divert ${nat_in} all from any to any # Allow all packets translated by NATd ${fwcmd} add allow all from any to ${int_ip}:${int_nm} # Drop whatever's left ${fwcmd} add reject all from any to any ### ***************** ### outbound External (secondary) Traffic ### ***************** # Deny all traffic to private nets ${fwcmd} add 30000 drop all from any to 192.168.0.0/16 // Outbound Telus Secondary ${fwcmd} add drop all from any to 172.16.0.0/12 ${fwcmd} add drop all from any to 10.0.0.0/8 ${fwcmd} add drop all from any to 127.0.0.0/8 ${fwcmd} add drop all from any to 0.0.0.0/8 ${fwcmd} add drop all from any to 169.254.0.0/16 ${fwcmd} add drop all from any to 192.0.2.0/24 ${fwcmd} add drop all from any to 204.152.64.0/23 ${fwcmd} add drop all from any to 224.0.0.0/3 # Pass all packets from ext2_ip ${fwcmd} add pass all from ${ext2_ip} to any # Drop whatever's left ${fwcmd} add deny all from any to any ### ***************** ### Inbound Shaw Traffic ### ***************** # Ensure this packet did not originate on a private network ${fwcmd} add 35000 drop all from 192.168.0.0/16 to any // Inbound Shaw ${fwcmd} add 35010 drop all from 172.16.0.0/12 to any ${fwcmd} add 35020 drop all from 10.0.0.0/8 to any ${fwcmd} add 35030 drop all from 127.0.0.0/8 to any ${fwcmd} add 35040 drop all from 0.0.0.0/8 to any ${fwcmd} add 35050 drop all from 169.254.0.0/16 to any ${fwcmd} add 35060 drop all from 192.0.2.0/24 to any ${fwcmd} add 35070 drop all from 204.152.64.0/23 to any ${fwcmd} add 35080 drop all from 224.0.0.0/3 to any # Drop the packet if it's not broadcast or destined to us ${fwcmd} add 35100 skipto 35500 all from any to \( ${shaw_ip} or ${srv2_ext} or ${shaw_bc} \) ${fwcmd} add 35200 deny all from any to any # Allow Inbound ICMP and SSH (To me) ${fwcmd} add 35510 allow icmp from any to me ${fwcmd} add 35520 allow tcp from any to me 22 # Pass to NATd for possible reverse translation ${fwcmd} add 35550 divert ${nat_in} all from any to any # NATd punches holes from 36000 - 36100 # Pass anything NATd has translated ${fwcmd} add 36200 allow all from any to ${int_ip}:${int_nm} # Deny whatever's left ${fwcmd} add deny all from any to any ### ***************** ### Outbound Shaw Traffic ### ***************** # Deny all traffic to private nets ${fwcmd} add 40000 drop all from any to 192.168.0.0/16 // Outbound Shaw ${fwcmd} add drop all from any to 172.16.0.0/12 ${fwcmd} add drop all from any to 10.0.0.0/8 ${fwcmd} add drop all from any to 127.0.0.0/8 ${fwcmd} add drop all from any to 0.0.0.0/8 ${fwcmd} add drop all from any to 169.254.0.0/16 ${fwcmd} add drop all from any to 192.0.2.0/24 ${fwcmd} add drop all from any to 204.152.64.0/23 ${fwcmd} add drop all from any to 224.0.0.0/3 # Allow all outbound traffic from me (includes NATted stuff) ${fwcmd} add allow all from \( ${shaw_ip} or ${srv2_ext} or ${shaw_bc} \) to any # Drop whatever's left ${fwcmd} add 42000 deny log all from any to any ###### ###### # Log all packets falling through the firewall ${fwcmd} add 65534 deny log all from any to any ------------------------------------------ Excerpts from /var/log/security Jan 9 09:11:55 bsdbox kernel: ipfw: 40900 Deny TCP 142.179.109.xxx:443 207.216.1 81.74:1111 out via rue0 Jan 9 09:12:07 bsdbox kernel: ipfw: 40900 Deny TCP 142.179.109.xxx:443 154.20.34 .158:61974 out via rue0 Jan 9 09:14:40 bsdbox kernel: ipfw: 40900 Deny TCP 142.179.109.xxx:443 64.180.16 4.232:44707 out via rue0 ------------------------------------------ All questions, comments, suggestions and flames (Well, okay maybe not the flames) are welcome! My apologies for the extremely long post. - Andrew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 10:31:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5787316A420 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:31:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8907243D4C for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:31:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) by kane.otenet.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-8) with SMTP id k0AAVX7B026961; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:31:35 +0200 Received: by flame.pc (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E5E79115DF; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:30:02 +0200 (EET) Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:30:02 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Chuck Robey Message-ID: <20060110103002.GB1415@flame.pc> References: <666bdb140601081330m3b394a02v@mail.gmail.com> <20060109140254.92455.qmail@web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <43C2C7FE.1010703@chuckr.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43C2C7FE.1010703@chuckr.org> Cc: JD Arnold , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which is the best open source C/C++ IDE out there? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:31:57 -0000 On 2006-01-09 15:30, Chuck Robey wrote: >JD Arnold wrote: >> That's why you should graduate to Emacs - with the makefile syntax >> highlighting, you'll at least see the differences between tabs and >> spaces before getting into trouble due to bad whitespacing!-) > > you're certainly giving a viewpoint that has a great deal of > truth to it, but I guess what scares folks is the horrible, > horrible emacs learning curve,. At one point in my career (in > school, lisp programming) I learned/used emacs. I admit, it's > got so much power, there isn't even a close competitor. BUT at > that time, I had a genius girl programmer at my side, and she > helped me with emacs syntax so heavily it was funny, and so I > could make use of emacs without really having to scale the > learning curve. > > If I'd actually had to scale that learning curve, do you think > I would have, even COULD have used emacs? One of the worst > things I had happen, I needed, one year later, to go back to vi > for a job, and just forgot enough emacs usages, and never went > back. I'd love to, but I'd have to find another genius Lisp > girlfriend, before I could do that. > > Likely? That's why emacs isn't the world's most popular editor/IDE. If you remove the artificial requirement of the help person being your girlfriend at the same time too, I'm sure a lot of the current Emacs users will be glad to help /me grins From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 10:35:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72CD216A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:35:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ertank@ozlerplastik.com) Received: from ozlerplastik.com (ozlerplastik.com [212.58.25.218]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6101543D55 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:35:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ertank@ozlerplastik.com) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by ozlerplastik.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05082A6ED4; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:35:35 +0200 (EET) Received: from ozlerplastik.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (ozlerplastik.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 81550-08; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:35:32 +0200 (EET) Received: from www.ozlerplastik.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by ozlerplastik.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76C8BA6EC9; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:35:32 +0200 (EET) From: "=?ISO-8859-9?Q?Ertan_K=FC=E7=FCko=F0lu?=" To: "Ted Mittelstaedt" , Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:35:32 +0200 Message-Id: <20060110103114.M96459@ozlerplastik.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20060110081037.M29590@ozlerplastik.com> X-Mailer: Open WebMail 2.51 20050228 X-OriginatingIP: 85.96.241.182 (ertank) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-9 X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ozlerplastik.com Cc: Subject: RE: Compaq ProLiant 1600 server freezes when detecting keyboard X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:35:48 -0000 Good news, System boots flawlessly after removing USB and Firewire in GENERIC kernel. Well, maybe FreeBSD should implement an option to disable certain device detection during install time, too. Thanks for the USB hint. You saved a lot of time for me to find the problem. --Ertan On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 01:40:05 -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote > ftp://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-Archive/old- > releases/i386/4.11- RELEASE/floppies/ > > works here with Microsoft Internet Exploder 6.0 > > Try setting your FTP client to passive mode. > > Ted > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: Ertan Küçükoglu [mailto:ertank@ozlerplastik.com] > >Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 12:15 AM > >To: Ted Mittelstaedt; questions@freebsd.org > >Subject: RE: Compaq ProLiant 1600 server freezes when detecting keyboard > > > > > >I'll appreciate if anyone directly sends me, or gives me a > >working link to > >download 4.11 release boot images. > > > >ftp://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-Archive/old-releases/ > > > >is not working. At least, connection is established, but no > >login info asked. > > > >Btw, this box is 5.4-release setup box. I cvsuped 6.0-stable > >sources. I may > >try to disable USB in GENERIC kernel. Re-compile and try with > >this kernel if > >this is the test that should be done. I'll give this a try > >while waiting for a > >working link for FreeBSD 4.11. > > > >--Ertan > > > >On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 22:17:18 -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote > >> Please try booting with FreeBSD 4.11 and let us know if it works > >> or not. (just download a boot floppy and use that) Also, it is > >> probably hanging at whatever would probe up AFTER keyboard detection, > >> not the keyboard detection. > >> > >> Be aware also that the Compaq 1600's are a bit odd in that they have > >> a partial USB chipset on the motherboard. It is detected as a USB > >> device - but althought the chip exists, a USB buss is not, in fact, > >> connected to it. There is a setting in many Linux distros to disable > >> USB probing at the installation boot to get around this, that is > >> documented somewhere. > >> > >> Ted > >> > >> >-----Original Message----- > >> >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >> >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of > >Ertan Küçükoglu > >> >Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 3:52 AM > >> >To: questions@freebsd.org > >> >Subject: Compaq ProLiant 1600 server freezes when detecting keyboard > >> > > >> > > >> >Hello, > >> > > >> >I wanted to replace slackware 10.1 with freebsd 6.0-release. > >> >Reason is the > >> >improvements on filesystem handling in 6.0 release. My system > >> >is serving as a > >> >file server with samba. > >> > > >> >I downloaded CDs and boot to install. During device probing, > >> >system hangs at > >> >keyboard detection. Below is the output written manually: > >> >----- > >> >atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 > >> >atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 > >> >kbd0 at atkbd0 > >> >stray irq13 > >> >atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > >> >===> here cursor locks, keyboard locks. ctrl+alt+del does > >not work <=== > >> >----- > >> > > >> >I searched the archives. It is suggested to change BIOS setting > >> >for the OS to > >> >"Other" for single CPU systems and to "UnixWare 2.1" for SMP > >> >systems. Mine is > >> >a SMP system. I tried several other OS settings in BIOS, > >> >unfortunately nothing > >> >helped. System bios update date is 11/8/2000. > >> > > >> >I tried to install 5.4-release and cvsup and upgrade to > >> >6.0-stable. Same > >> >problem with GENERIC kernel of yesterday sources. > >> > > >> >This system is a production machine and I have to fix it until > >> >end of this > >> >week. There is a temporary backup system running at the moment. > >> > > >> >If there is anything that I can provide, please ask for it and > >> >I'll do my best > >> >to provide. > >> > > >> >Regards, > >> >-- > >> >Ertan Küçükoðlu > >> >ertank@ozlerplastik.com > >> >Özler Plastik San. ve Tic. A.S. > >> >Tel: +90.212.676.6767 > >> >Fax: +90.212.676.8012 > >> >(webmail) > >> > > >> >_______________________________________________ > >> >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >> >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >> >To unsubscribe, send any mail to > >> >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >> > > >> >-- > >> >No virus found in this incoming message. > >> >Checked by AVG Free Edition. > >> >Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.15/223 - Release > >> >Date: 1/6/2006 > >> > > > > > > >-- > >Ertan Küçükoðlu > >ertank@ozlerplastik.com > >Özler Plastik San. ve Tic. A.S. > >Tel: +90.212.676.6767 > >Fax: +90.212.676.8012 > >Mob: +90.533.226.0051 > >(webmail) > > > > > >-- > >No virus found in this incoming message. > >Checked by AVG Free Edition. > >Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.15/223 - Release > >Date: 1/6/2006 > > -- Ertan Küçükoðlu ertank@ozlerplastik.com Özler Plastik San. ve Tic. A.S. Tel: +90.212.676.6767 Fax: +90.212.676.8012 Mob: +90.533.226.0051 (webmail) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 11:52:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56DE616A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:52:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marko@freebsd.org) Received: from pih-relay05.plus.net (pih-relay05.plus.net [212.159.14.132]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E60ED43D46 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:51:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marko@freebsd.org) Received: from [80.229.231.20] (helo=[192.168.1.4]) by pih-relay05.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1EwI2c-0005D9-0R for questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:51:54 +0000 Message-ID: <43C3A015.5010004@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:52:53 +0000 From: Mark Ovens User-Agent: Mail/News 1.6a1 (X11/20051228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org References: <20060110090130.67517.qmail@ssr.com> In-Reply-To: <20060110090130.67517.qmail@ssr.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: System time suddenly changed after reboot. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:52:02 -0000 Scott Ballantyne wrote: > Running 5.3-RELEASE. > > After many years of using FreeBSD, and as many reboots or more, I had > occasion to reboot today, and a few hours later discovered to my > horror that the system time had suddenly been moved ahead to the year > 2020! > > I did the best I could with the resulting mess, but I am curious if > anyone else has seen this, or what would cause it. This is the same > hardware I have been running for a couple of years now, and I haven't > changed anything in the bios or system. > I had that problem back with early versions of 5.x - up to 5.3 IIRC - except that it happened with 9 out of 10 reboots for me. After weeks of trying to solve the problem it turned out to be the keyboard!!1 Yes, the fscking keyboard. It's a Compaq USB and I'm guessing that there is something non-standard about it (it won't work when connected to a PS/2 port via an adaptor for instance). Don't know whether this helps you. Regards, Mark From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 11:55:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 998C416A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:55:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gandalf@messias.qhigh.com) Received: from messias.qhigh.com (3e44ae41.adsl.enternet.hu [62.68.174.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA26643D69 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:55:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gandalf@messias.qhigh.com) Received: from [172.16.0.26] (earth.msnet [172.16.0.26]) by messias.qhigh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4039D5C3A; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:01:10 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43C3A0D1.4000707@messias.qhigh.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:56:01 +0100 From: User Gandalf User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051228) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Martin_M=F6ller?= , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <43C03ED4.1070404@messias.qhigh.com> <20060110055157.GC15566@andvari.ath.cx> <20060110102324.sfh5jbzzreskwc8w@imp4.free.fr> <43C0DB6E.4060801@messias.qhigh.com> <20060110093454.GA16603@andvari.ath.cx> In-Reply-To: <20060110093454.GA16603@andvari.ath.cx> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------070405080305070900050206" Cc: Subject: Re: Xorg - how to disable some video modes? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:55:32 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------070405080305070900050206 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Martin Möller wrote: >* gandalf [08-01-2006 10:29:18 +0100]: > > > >>I can attach my xorg.conf file, if it helps. >> >> > >Yes, that would help indeed. > > Here is the config. I made a mistake. You were right. I forgot to use DefaultDepth. But I do not understand why I need it, since 24 is the only depth specified in my screen section, Without "DefaultDepth 24" it starts with 1900x1440. With "DefaultDepth 24" is starts in 1024x768 but it does not allow me to switch to 1280x1024 with Ctrl-Alt-Plus. Thanks, Les --------------070405080305070900050206 Content-Type: text/plain; name="xorg.conf" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="xorg.conf" Section "ServerLayout" Identifier "X.org Configured" Screen 0 "Screen0" 0 0 InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer" InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard" EndSection Section "Files" RgbPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" ModulePath "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" EndSection Section "Module" Load "dbe" Load "dri" Load "extmod" Load "glx" Load "record" Load "xtrap" Load "freetype" Load "type1" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Keyboard0" Driver "kbd" Option "CoreKeyboard" Option "XkbRules" "xorg" Option "XkbModel" "pc105" Option "XkbLayout" "hu" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Mouse0" Driver "mouse" Option "Protocol" "auto" Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" EndSection Section "Monitor" #DisplaySize 360 270 # mm Identifier "Monitor0" VendorName "SAM" ModelName "SyncMaster" ### Uncomment if you don't want to default to DDC: # HorizSync 30.0 - 96.0 # VertRefresh 50.0 - 160.0 HorizSync 30.0 - 95.0 VertRefresh 55.0 - 100.0 UseModes "SamSung957" Option "DPMS" EndSection Section "Modes" Identifier "SamSung957" # 1024x768 @ 100.00 Hz (GTF) hsync: 81.40 kHz; pclk: 113.31 MHz Modeline "1024x768_100.00" 113.31 1024 1096 1208 1392 768 769 772 814 -HSync +Vsync # 1280x1024 @ 85.00 Hz (GTF) hsync: 91.38 kHz; pclk: 159.36 MHz Modeline "1280x1024_85.00" 159.36 1280 1376 1512 1744 1024 1025 1028 1075 -HSync +Vsync EndSection Section "Device" ### Available Driver options are:- ### Values: : integer, : float, : "True"/"False", ### : "String", : " Hz/kHz/MHz" ### [arg]: arg optional #Option "NoAccel" # [] #Option "SWcursor" # [] #Option "ColorKey" # #Option "CacheLines" # #Option "Dac6Bit" # [] #Option "DRI" # [] #Option "NoDDC" # [] #Option "ShowCache" # [] #Option "XvMCSurfaces" # #Option "PageFlip" # [] Identifier "Card0" Driver "i810" VendorName "Intel Corp." BoardName "82845G/GL [Brookdale-G] Chipset Integrated Graphics Device" BusID "PCI:0:2:0" EndSection Section "Screen" Identifier "Screen0" Device "Card0" Monitor "Monitor0" DefaultDepth 24 SubSection "Display" Viewport 0 0 Virtual 1024 768 Depth 24 Modes "1024x768_100.00 1280x1024_85.00" EndSubSection EndSection --------------070405080305070900050206-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 11:56:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8C1416A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:56:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA7DC43D7C for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:56:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k0AC02P66809; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 04:00:03 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: =?iso-8859-1?B?RXJ0YW4gS/zn/Gtv8Gx1?= , Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 03:56:29 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <20060110103114.M96459@ozlerplastik.com> Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: Compaq ProLiant 1600 server freezes when detecting keyboard X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:56:43 -0000 Thanks, that saves me a lot of time too. I have a rack of 1600R's that need updating. Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Ertan Küçükoglu >Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 2:36 AM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt; questions@freebsd.org >Subject: RE: Compaq ProLiant 1600 server freezes when detecting keyboard > > >Good news, > >System boots flawlessly after removing USB and Firewire in >GENERIC kernel. > >Well, maybe FreeBSD should implement an option to disable >certain device >detection during install time, too. > >Thanks for the USB hint. You saved a lot of time for me to find >the problem. > >--Ertan > >On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 01:40:05 -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote >> ftp://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-Archive/old- >> releases/i386/4.11- RELEASE/floppies/ >> >> works here with Microsoft Internet Exploder 6.0 >> >> Try setting your FTP client to passive mode. >> >> Ted >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: Ertan Küçükoglu [mailto:ertank@ozlerplastik.com] >> >Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 12:15 AM >> >To: Ted Mittelstaedt; questions@freebsd.org >> >Subject: RE: Compaq ProLiant 1600 server freezes when >detecting keyboard >> > >> > >> >I'll appreciate if anyone directly sends me, or gives me a >> >working link to >> >download 4.11 release boot images. >> > >> >ftp://ftp-archive.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD-Archive/old-releases/ >> > >> >is not working. At least, connection is established, but no >> >login info asked. >> > >> >Btw, this box is 5.4-release setup box. I cvsuped 6.0-stable >> >sources. I may >> >try to disable USB in GENERIC kernel. Re-compile and try with >> >this kernel if >> >this is the test that should be done. I'll give this a try >> >while waiting for a >> >working link for FreeBSD 4.11. >> > >> >--Ertan >> > >> >On Mon, 9 Jan 2006 22:17:18 -0800, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote >> >> Please try booting with FreeBSD 4.11 and let us know if it works >> >> or not. (just download a boot floppy and use that) Also, it is >> >> probably hanging at whatever would probe up AFTER keyboard >detection, >> >> not the keyboard detection. >> >> >> >> Be aware also that the Compaq 1600's are a bit odd in that >they have >> >> a partial USB chipset on the motherboard. It is detected as a USB >> >> device - but althought the chip exists, a USB buss is not, in fact, >> >> connected to it. There is a setting in many Linux distros >to disable >> >> USB probing at the installation boot to get around this, that is >> >> documented somewhere. >> >> >> >> Ted >> >> >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >> >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> >> >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of >> >Ertan Küçükoglu >> >> >Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 3:52 AM >> >> >To: questions@freebsd.org >> >> >Subject: Compaq ProLiant 1600 server freezes when >detecting keyboard >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >Hello, >> >> > >> >> >I wanted to replace slackware 10.1 with freebsd 6.0-release. >> >> >Reason is the >> >> >improvements on filesystem handling in 6.0 release. My system >> >> >is serving as a >> >> >file server with samba. >> >> > >> >> >I downloaded CDs and boot to install. During device probing, >> >> >system hangs at >> >> >keyboard detection. Below is the output written manually: >> >> >----- >> >> >atkbdc0: at port 0x60,0x64 on isa0 >> >> >atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 >> >> >kbd0 at atkbd0 >> >> >stray irq13 >> >> >atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] >> >> >===> here cursor locks, keyboard locks. ctrl+alt+del does >> >not work <=== >> >> >----- >> >> > >> >> >I searched the archives. It is suggested to change BIOS setting >> >> >for the OS to >> >> >"Other" for single CPU systems and to "UnixWare 2.1" for SMP >> >> >systems. Mine is >> >> >a SMP system. I tried several other OS settings in BIOS, >> >> >unfortunately nothing >> >> >helped. System bios update date is 11/8/2000. >> >> > >> >> >I tried to install 5.4-release and cvsup and upgrade to >> >> >6.0-stable. Same >> >> >problem with GENERIC kernel of yesterday sources. >> >> > >> >> >This system is a production machine and I have to fix it until >> >> >end of this >> >> >week. There is a temporary backup system running at the moment. >> >> > >> >> >If there is anything that I can provide, please ask for it and >> >> >I'll do my best >> >> >to provide. >> >> > >> >> >Regards, >> >> >-- >> >> >Ertan Küçükoðlu >> >> >ertank@ozlerplastik.com >> >> >Özler Plastik San. ve Tic. A.S. >> >> >Tel: +90.212.676.6767 >> >> >Fax: +90.212.676.8012 >> >> >(webmail) >> >> > >> >> >_______________________________________________ >> >> >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> >> >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> >> >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> >> >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> > >> >> >-- >> >> >No virus found in this incoming message. >> >> >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >> >> >Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.15/223 - Release >> >> >Date: 1/6/2006 >> >> > >> > >> > >> >-- >> >Ertan Küçükoðlu >> >ertank@ozlerplastik.com >> >Özler Plastik San. ve Tic. A.S. >> >Tel: +90.212.676.6767 >> >Fax: +90.212.676.8012 >> >Mob: +90.533.226.0051 >> >(webmail) >> > >> > >> >-- >> >No virus found in this incoming message. >> >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >> >Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.15/223 - Release >> >Date: 1/6/2006 >> > > > >-- >Ertan Küçükoðlu >ertank@ozlerplastik.com >Özler Plastik San. ve Tic. A.S. >Tel: +90.212.676.6767 >Fax: +90.212.676.8012 >Mob: +90.533.226.0051 >(webmail) > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.15/223 - Release >Date: 1/6/2006 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 12:09:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D75E116A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:09:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from SP373@student.apu.ac.uk) Received: from mailhub-out.apu.ac.uk (mailhub-out.apu.ac.uk [193.63.55.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 314C043D66 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:09:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from SP373@student.apu.ac.uk) Received: from smtp.cam.apu.ac.uk ([193.63.55.9]:51259) by mailhub.anglia.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EwIHR-0005v4-40 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:07:13 +0000 Received: from cam-netmail.netware.anglia.ac.uk ([194.83.45.141]:10522 helo=student.apu.ac.uk) by boswell.cam.apu.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1EwIEH-0006y2-56 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:03:57 +0000 Received: from SP373 [172.212.93.178] by student.apu.ac.uk with NetMail ModWeb Module; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:03:51 +0000 From: "SPYRIDON PAPADOPOULOS" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:03:51 +0000 X-Mailer: NetMail ModWeb Module X-Sender: SP373 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <1136894631.20dec60SP373@student.apu.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ARU-HELO: smtp.cam.apu.ac.uk X-ARU-sender-host: smtp.cam.apu.ac.uk [193.63.55.9]:51259 X-ARU-MailScanner-Info: see http://www.apu.ac.uk/mail-problems X-ARU-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ARU-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5.799, required 6, autolearn=not spam, ARU_FROM_AC_UK -4.00, AWL 0.67, BAYES_00 -2.60, FORGED_RCVD_HELO 0.14) X-ARU-MailScanner-From: sp373@student.apu.ac.uk X-APU-MailFilter: message scanned X-ARU-MailFilter: message scanned Subject: ip_icmp.h strange problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: SP373@student.apu.ac.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:09:16 -0000 Hi, I am include ip_icmp.h to a program. The icmp struct in there is exactly th= e same with the one on: http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/source/netinet/ip_icmp.h?v=3DTRUSTEDBSD-AUDIT3=20 (this is just the first exactly the same struct i found online) I am using FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #1 I have already included header files like tcp.h, ip.h, udp.h etc in my prog= ram. Now when i am trying to compile my program with the command: #gcc -o capTool capTool0.1 -lpcap it gives me syntax errors, where n_short values appear: lines: 60, 61, 67, = 68 and 89 (in my ip_icmp.h). 71, 72, 78, 79 and 100 (on the online one). After changing the first four to "u_short ..." it compiles properly... This also happened with some value in ip.h. However i am not sure which one= now, because i changed it and it worked immediately (so i didn't even no= te what exactly i changed..and since it worked to be honest i didn't mind= ) the problem is with the value in line 89: n_time its_otime; /* Originate */ even if i change that to: u_time its_otime; /* Originate */ it still gives me syntax error before "n_time" or "u_time" Can anyone help and explain briefly - if possible - how is this happening? = I cannot believe that the n_* values are wrong, but are working when chan= ging them to u_*. I like getting involved with the system header files...but it doesn't reall= y look appropriate to me ;o), or it is? This message is written quickly in case the problem is known. I can provide= with any required information if needed. Please advice thank you in advance Spiros Papadopoulos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 12:14:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4623516A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:14:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BEBDF43D48 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:14:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k0ACHiP66885; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 04:17:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "jdow" , Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 04:14:12 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <04a601c615ce$4dc4d7b0$1225a8c0@kittycat> Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: Spamcop listed - need help to diagnose why X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:14:15 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of jdow >Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 2:12 AM >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: Spamcop listed - need help to diagnose why > >> >> Unfortunately, jdow, since your using this setup, the spammer has >> already successfully delivered the mail to you. The fact that you >> delete the spam before reading makes no difference - the spammer >> doesen't know that and thinks they have successfully delivered it. > >No they have not. They've managed to get it onto my machine, >transiently. >It never got delivered to ME, the organic unit here at this email >address. I know that and your arguing out of your hat - simply pulling statements out of context. You know perfectly well that the "to you" in the sentence was to your machine, the paragraph context told you that. Unfortunately in the spam game, it only matters if the spammer thinks they didn't successfully deliver it to you. And that only happens if the machine delivering the spam gets an error when trying to deliver it, since the spammer isn't using legitimate senders addresses and cannot get feedback any other way. I've never been a fan of post-filters for this reason. For some kinds of filtering - like content filtering for example - that is the only way you can do it. But I think it the height of strangeness when SA checks blacklists and such to assign scores. If they really cared about spamfiltering, they would use the IP blacklists in the way they are intended - to block access completely to the spammer, not even let them connect to the server at all. The mail that SA is assigning scores on based on an IP blacklist shouldn't even be in the SA filter to begin with. >> Denying the spam before it's even accepted into the server is a >> much better way. Unfortunately, a content filter means you have to > >If you can make fetchmail do that you're pretty clever, kemo sabe. > No, but I can replace the Rube Goldberg fetchmail arraingement your using with a real mailserver that is on the Internet all the time and can make use of blacklist servers and such. And yes, I'm just as good at making smart-alecky comments as you are. Probably better at it, actually. Do you want to knock it off and go back to the technical merits discussion now? ;-) Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 13:04:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 931B816A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:04:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33305.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33305.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1C67443D48 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:04:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 35589 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Jan 2006 13:04:32 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=6m2pjuZ5CHL4GUKukq5sfsabxQRVbKemA0laGDNv8reYOC6GnQ99LXH9k99th/PxBbUgHRXOWwFkhogEfPabMSMu4FlDAVkXRisCup9AzI4V1+EvuT6KALhOLQPQaaagsQxhA2n+Rgoo68NQqOsCOctORiIGlezpdy2qwrEVJew= ; Message-ID: <20060110130432.35587.qmail@web33305.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33305.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:04:32 PST Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:04:32 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: Ted Mittelstaedt , jdow , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: RE: Spamcop listed - need help to diagnose why X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:04:33 -0000 --- Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On > Behalf Of jdow > >Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 2:12 AM > >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >Subject: Re: Spamcop listed - need help to > diagnose why > > > >> > >> Unfortunately, jdow, since your using this > setup, the spammer has > >> already successfully delivered the mail to > you. The fact that you > >> delete the spam before reading makes no > difference - the spammer > >> doesen't know that and thinks they have > successfully delivered it. > > > >No they have not. They've managed to get it > onto my machine, > >transiently. > >It never got delivered to ME, the organic unit > here at this email > >address. > > I know that and your arguing out of your hat - > simply pulling statements > out of context. You know perfectly well that > the "to you" in the > sentence was to your machine, the paragraph > context told you that. > > Unfortunately in the spam game, it only matters > if the spammer > thinks they didn't successfully deliver it to > you. And that only > happens if the machine delivering the spam gets > an error when > trying to deliver it, since the spammer isn't > using legitimate > senders addresses and cannot get feedback any > other way. > > I've never been a fan of post-filters for this > reason. For some > kinds of filtering - like content filtering for > example - that > is the only way you can do it. But I think it > the height of > strangeness when SA checks blacklists and such > to assign scores. > If they really cared about spamfiltering, they > would use the > IP blacklists in the way they are intended - to > block access > completely to the spammer, not even let them > connect to the > server at all. The mail that SA is assigning > scores on based on > an IP blacklist shouldn't even be in the SA > filter to begin with. > > >> Denying the spam before it's even accepted > into the server is a > >> much better way. Unfortunately, a content > filter means you have to > > > >If you can make fetchmail do that you're > pretty clever, kemo sabe. > > > > No, but I can replace the Rube Goldberg > fetchmail arraingement your > using with a real mailserver that is on the > Internet all the time > and can make use of blacklist servers and such. > > And yes, I'm just as good at making > smart-alecky comments as you > are. Probably better at it, actually. Do you > want to knock it > off and go back to the technical merits > discussion now? ;-) YIKES. This is what happens when you put pimply-faced kids in charge of important things like mail. The "carpet bomb MECCA in order to kill a few terrorists" approach to computing. Its frightening. DT __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 13:08:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD7C516A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:08:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from rosebud.otenet.gr (rosebud.otenet.gr [195.170.0.94]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1197A43D48 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:08:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) by rosebud.otenet.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-8) with SMTP id k0AD8Q6g030342; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:08:26 +0200 Received: by flame.pc (Postfix, from userid 1001) id F13CC115C1; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:06:58 +0200 (EET) Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:06:58 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: SPYRIDON PAPADOPOULOS Message-ID: <20060110130658.GC2240@flame.pc> References: <1136894631.20dec60SP373@student.apu.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1136894631.20dec60SP373@student.apu.ac.uk> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ip_icmp.h strange problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:08:29 -0000 Format recovered. Please read http://www.lemis.com/email.html to see why the original format of the message was in dire need of recovery. On 2006-01-10 12:03, SPYRIDON PAPADOPOULOS wrote: > Hi, > > I am include ip_icmp.h to a program. The icmp struct in there is > exactly the same with the one on: > http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/source/netinet/ip_icmp.h?v=TRUSTEDBSD-AUDIT3 > (this is just the first exactly the same struct i found online) > I am using FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #1 > > I have already included header files like tcp.h, ip.h, udp.h etc in my > program. > > Now when i am trying to compile my program with the command: > #gcc -o capTool capTool0.1 -lpcap > > it gives me syntax errors, where n_short values appear: lines: 60, 61, > 67, 68 and 89 (in my ip_icmp.h). > 71, 72, 78, 79 and 100 (on the online one). > > After changing the first four to "u_short ..." it compiles properly... NO! When you are an application's programmer YOU DON'T EDIT THE SYSTEM HEADERS. Ever! What you missed in this particular case was to include in_systm.h before icmp.h, as you can see below: % keramida@flame:/home/keramida$ grep n_short /usr/include/*/* % /usr/include/netinet/in_systm.h:typedef u_int16_t n_short; \ % /* short as received from the net */ % /usr/include/netinet/ip_icmp.h: n_short icd_id; % /usr/include/netinet/ip_icmp.h: n_short icd_seq; % /usr/include/netinet/ip_icmp.h: n_short ipm_void; % /usr/include/netinet/ip_icmp.h: n_short ipm_nextmtu; % keramida@flame:/home/keramida$ > This also happened with some value in ip.h. However i am not sure > which one now, because i changed it and it worked immediately (so i > didn't even note what exactly i changed..and since it worked to be > honest i didn't mind) > the problem is with the value in line 89: > n_time its_otime; /* Originate */ > > even if i change that to: > u_time its_otime; /* Originate */ > it still gives me syntax error before "n_time" or "u_time" > > Can anyone help and explain briefly - if possible - how is this > happening? I cannot believe that the n_* values are wrong, but are > working when changing them to u_*. Changing them where? Not in the system headers I hope. > I like getting involved with the system header files...but it doesn't > really look appropriate to me ;o), or it is? You are headed down the wrong path. You are not supposed to 'get involved' with the /usr/include files by manually making changes to them. If you know what you are doing, the right place to make changes is /usr/src, and then a build & install cycle. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 13:20:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D771F16A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:20:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jdow@earthlink.net) Received: from smtpauth01.mail.atl.earthlink.net (smtpauth01.mail.atl.earthlink.net [209.86.89.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54BD743D45 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:20:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jdow@earthlink.net) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=rKot/2OtCqvtMNmvCqiURVJLKjSsGTxqkmSoe3BeyJdsdjS6ue9gGsz3uv0BEGJa; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [71.116.149.244] (helo=kittycat) by smtpauth01.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EwJQM-0005ub-HV for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:20:30 -0500 Message-ID: <04d001c615e8$a4b18090$1225a8c0@kittycat> From: "jdow" To: References: Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:20:35 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 X-ELNK-Trace: bb89ecdb26a8f9f24d2b10475b571120d946e384bfc0e9a4c8468066c88698e330a5558061b34c28350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 71.116.149.244 Subject: Re: Spamcop listed - need help to diagnose why X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:20:32 -0000 From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" >>-----Original Message----- >>From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>> >>> Unfortunately, jdow, since your using this setup, the spammer has >>> already successfully delivered the mail to you. The fact that you >>> delete the spam before reading makes no difference - the spammer >>> doesen't know that and thinks they have successfully delivered it. >> >>No they have not. They've managed to get it onto my machine, >>transiently. >>It never got delivered to ME, the organic unit here at this email >>address. > > I know that and your arguing out of your hat - simply pulling statements > out of context. You know perfectly well that the "to you" in the > sentence was to your machine, the paragraph context told you that. > > Unfortunately in the spam game, it only matters if the spammer > thinks they didn't successfully deliver it to you. And that only > happens if the machine delivering the spam gets an error when > trying to deliver it, since the spammer isn't using legitimate > senders addresses and cannot get feedback any other way. Sonny, you define it your way and I'll define it mine. The object is to not bug the user with spam. The secondary object is to keep the machine load for spam as low as possible. You have a priority inversion there. > I've never been a fan of post-filters for this reason. For some > kinds of filtering - like content filtering for example - that > is the only way you can do it. But I think it the height of > strangeness when SA checks blacklists and such to assign scores. > If they really cared about spamfiltering, they would use the > IP blacklists in the way they are intended - to block access > completely to the spammer, not even let them connect to the > server at all. The mail that SA is assigning scores on based on > an IP blacklist shouldn't even be in the SA filter to begin with. People do that and discover they have blocked paying customers and the like. If you are going to raw block on black lists at least setup a scoring system that has some wide testing behind it. >>> Denying the spam before it's even accepted into the server is a >>> much better way. Unfortunately, a content filter means you have to >> >>If you can make fetchmail do that you're pretty clever, kemo sabe. >> > > No, but I can replace the Rube Goldberg fetchmail arraingement your > using with a real mailserver that is on the Internet all the time > and can make use of blacklist servers and such. > > And yes, I'm just as good at making smart-alecky comments as you > are. Probably better at it, actually. Do you want to knock it > off and go back to the technical merits discussion now? ;-) I happen to put a priority on other things. "Good enough is good enough." If I were to get into serious tinkering it would be with software defined radios rather than the mail system when it's working perfectly well for the needs here at this site. Of course, YMMV. {^_^} From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 13:23:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E174216A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:23:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jdow@earthlink.net) Received: from smtpauth01.mail.atl.earthlink.net (smtpauth01.mail.atl.earthlink.net [209.86.89.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9146A43D62 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:22:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jdow@earthlink.net) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=l0FqvJ4S+rH/4JYzyBjFgMzsGNfF2ZOlK0axfmdQQzMRSM5q6+v6/FhQIJ01x/pB; h=Received:Message-ID:From:To:References:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Priority:X-MSMail-Priority:X-Mailer:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [71.116.149.244] (helo=kittycat) by smtpauth01.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EwJSR-00079r-9l; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:22:39 -0500 Message-ID: <04d601c615e8$f33683f0$1225a8c0@kittycat> From: "jdow" To: , "Ted Mittelstaedt" , References: <20060110130432.35587.qmail@web33305.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:22:47 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 X-ELNK-Trace: bb89ecdb26a8f9f24d2b10475b571120d946e384bfc0e9a4ec56f9377f22b6bfbec6f38da3dc5216350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 71.116.149.244 Cc: Subject: Re: Spamcop listed - need help to diagnose why X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:23:02 -0000 From: "Danial Thom" > --- Ted Mittelstaedt >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> > >> >> >> >> Unfortunately, jdow, since your using this >> setup, the spammer has >> >> already successfully delivered the mail to >> you. The fact that you >> >> delete the spam before reading makes no >> difference - the spammer >> >> doesen't know that and thinks they have >> successfully delivered it. >> > >> >No they have not. They've managed to get it >> onto my machine, >> >transiently. >> >It never got delivered to ME, the organic unit >> here at this email >> >address. >> >> I know that and your arguing out of your hat - >> simply pulling statements >> out of context. You know perfectly well that >> the "to you" in the >> sentence was to your machine, the paragraph >> context told you that. >> >> Unfortunately in the spam game, it only matters >> if the spammer >> thinks they didn't successfully deliver it to >> you. And that only >> happens if the machine delivering the spam gets >> an error when >> trying to deliver it, since the spammer isn't >> using legitimate >> senders addresses and cannot get feedback any >> other way. >> >> I've never been a fan of post-filters for this >> reason. For some >> kinds of filtering - like content filtering for >> example - that >> is the only way you can do it. But I think it >> the height of >> strangeness when SA checks blacklists and such >> to assign scores. >> If they really cared about spamfiltering, they >> would use the >> IP blacklists in the way they are intended - to >> block access >> completely to the spammer, not even let them >> connect to the >> server at all. The mail that SA is assigning >> scores on based on >> an IP blacklist shouldn't even be in the SA >> filter to begin with. >> >> >> Denying the spam before it's even accepted >> into the server is a >> >> much better way. Unfortunately, a content >> filter means you have to >> > >> >If you can make fetchmail do that you're >> pretty clever, kemo sabe. >> > >> >> No, but I can replace the Rube Goldberg >> fetchmail arraingement your >> using with a real mailserver that is on the >> Internet all the time >> and can make use of blacklist servers and such. >> >> And yes, I'm just as good at making >> smart-alecky comments as you >> are. Probably better at it, actually. Do you >> want to knock it >> off and go back to the technical merits >> discussion now? ;-) > > YIKES. This is what happens when you put > pimply-faced kids in charge of important things > like mail. The "carpet bomb MECCA in order to > kill a few terrorists" approach to computing. Its > frightening. Yeah, maybe he'll manage to survive long enough to acquire some wisdom such as sometimes comes with age. (And without that gained wisdom getting old must be unbearable.) {^_-} From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 13:23:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 325C416A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:23:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ivan.roth@free.fr) Received: from smtp4-g19.free.fr (smtp4-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 085C443D5A for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:23:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ivan.roth@free.fr) Received: from imp3-g19.free.fr (imp3-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.3]) by smtp4-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFB814EA9D; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:23:21 +0100 (CET) Received: by imp3-g19.free.fr (Postfix, from userid 33) id E407D54235; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:23:21 +0100 (MET) Received: from LAubervilliers-151-13-68-7.w217-128.abo.wanadoo.fr (LAubervilliers-151-13-68-7.w217-128.abo.wanadoo.fr [217.128.42.7]) by imp4.free.fr (Horde) with HTTP for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:23:21 +0100 Message-ID: <20060110142321.7gcqljcpc84480wk@imp4.free.fr> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:23:21 +0100 From: ivan.roth@free.fr To: User Gandalf References: <43C03ED4.1070404@messias.qhigh.com> <20060110055157.GC15566@andvari.ath.cx> <20060110102324.sfh5jbzzreskwc8w@imp4.free.fr> <43C0DB6E.4060801@messias.qhigh.com> <20060110093454.GA16603@andvari.ath.cx> <43C3A0D1.4000707@messias.qhigh.com> In-Reply-To: <43C3A0D1.4000707@messias.qhigh.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xorg - how to disable some video modes? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:23:27 -0000 Quoting User Gandalf : > Martin M=F6ller wrote: > >> * gandalf [08-01-2006 10:29:18 +0100]: >> >> >>> I can attach my xorg.conf file, if it helps. >>> >> >> Yes, that would help indeed. >> > Here is the config. I made a mistake. You were right. I forgot to use > DefaultDepth. But I do not understand why I need it, since 24 is the > only depth specified in my screen section, > > Without "DefaultDepth 24" it starts with 1900x1440. With > "DefaultDepth 24" is starts in 1024x768 but it does not allow me to > switch to 1280x1024 with Ctrl-Alt-Plus. > > Thanks, > > Les > Hi "user gandalf" :) You seem to know more than me the xorg.conf file. What happened if you separate your Modes like this: Modes "1024x768_100.00" "1280x1024_85.00" Mine are separated and all works fine. If you can't find answer before 7 p.= m. (GMT) I will test some changes on my config. Regards, Ivan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 13:27:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1F0D16A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:27:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.121]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4190743D72 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:27:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 46928 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Jan 2006 13:27:36 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=S5/8qrYa9VIHc0RXqYxJiF99gFwdVR33WFtDY+UAwAnnxs5BG9ewsqkfDyu8s8Z7Zu1PoUQTCtL5maL7B2/E6KTt6Qzmc12WK6qFebzIfvdQZ9mc+CWJ2dMGOY/xbprzXRgvi1DItOIxEwo6sbep0bjqQa3fl4KjKfbFw01hN4Q= ; Message-ID: <20060110132736.46926.qmail@web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:27:36 PST Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:27:36 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: RE: Sparc vs i386 architecture X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:27:47 -0000 --- Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On > Behalf Of Gerard Seibert > >Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2006 7:02 AM > >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >Subject: Re: Sparc vs i386 architecture > > > > > >Danial Thom > > > >> Frankly, people who spend $9000. worth of > time > >> dicking around with some old piece of junk > to > >> avoid buying a $400. computer crack me up. > :) > > > >Yes, it is amassing. I have a friend who has > spent thousands of dollars > >keeping his old car running. He could have > purchased a new one with a > >new warranty, etc. and have saved all that > money, but he refused. For > >some individuals, the challenge is the real > thrill that they crave. > > > > That is an interesting, if very inaccurate, > analogy, and as a car guy > that does my own wrenching, let me tell you > why. > > Computer gear every year gets cheaper and > faster and better. Cars > by contrast, have not improved much over the > last 20 years - unless you > count larger cupholders as an improvement - and > espically they haven't > changed at all over the last 10. Ever since > EFI and airbags became > standard on vehicles there just haven't been > any compelling or significant > improvements. In fact for many models, the > engine designs themselves > are the same as 20 years ago. For example the > 2.4 Turbo used in > the 2006 Chrysler PT Cruiser went into > production in 1994, the 4 speed > computer-controlled transmission used in that > car went into production > in 1989. Many parts for that transmission in > fact are the same - how > many computers do you know that you can use a > 17 year old part in? you need to get out more, Ted, if you think cars haven't improved much in 20 years. I know you can't afford a BMW or Mercedes, but you can test drive them for free if you put on a nice suit. Drive a '95 BMW and a 2005 and you'll see there are huge differences in power, handling, brakes and a whole lot of stuff you can't see, not to mention safety. Anti-skid brakes were a joke when they first came out; now I can stop on a dime. Traction control actually works now. But computers are not comparable to cars. It might make sense to keep an old car going as a new car depreciates much more than your time is worth in the first year, and they aren't cheap. DT __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 13:40:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8482116A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:40:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33301.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33301.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.116]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 155BB43D46 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:40:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 8290 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Jan 2006 13:40:08 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=LC8me6GwtbhT0MvGgQnk2ninBBRLumcNINnMlmQqUxREqkmukk5k8R44S4UlUYOYT+40YWyf0QJEqUrKPWQpmPLhzb6Di66NOTZ4YP+u5fLg1/93/9VNZliJ1qUrbNYVDuBbtade92cQEqK6W2ohcufvYcfyfHP9Xq87SfsohOI= ; Message-ID: <20060110134008.8285.qmail@web33301.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33301.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:40:08 PST Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 05:40:08 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: Giorgos Keramidas In-Reply-To: <20060110103002.GB1415@flame.pc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which is the best open source C/C++ IDE out there? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:40:16 -0000 --- Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2006-01-09 15:30, Chuck Robey > wrote: > >JD Arnold wrote: > >> That's why you should graduate to Emacs - > with the makefile syntax > >> highlighting, you'll at least see the > differences between tabs and > >> spaces before getting into trouble due to > bad whitespacing!-) > > > > you're certainly giving a viewpoint that has > a great deal of > > truth to it, but I guess what scares folks is > the horrible, > > horrible emacs learning curve,. At one point > in my career (in > > school, lisp programming) I learned/used > emacs. I admit, it's > > got so much power, there isn't even a close > competitor. BUT at > > that time, I had a genius girl programmer at > my side, and she > > helped me with emacs syntax so heavily it was > funny, and so I > > could make use of emacs without really having > to scale the > > learning curve. > > > > If I'd actually had to scale that learning > curve, do you think > > I would have, even COULD have used emacs? > One of the worst > > things I had happen, I needed, one year > later, to go back to vi > > for a job, and just forgot enough emacs > usages, and never went > > back. I'd love to, but I'd have to find > another genius Lisp > > girlfriend, before I could do that. > > > > Likely? That's why emacs isn't the world's > most popular editor/IDE. I had a girlfriend with a Lisp. But what a body! DT __________________________________________ Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. Just $16.99/mo. or less. dsl.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 13:46:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 057E716A420 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:46:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tofik@oxygen.az) Received: from mail.alkar.net (mail.alkar.net [195.248.191.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2EB143D55 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:46:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tofik@oxygen.az) Received: from [213.227.193.75] (HELO [192.168.0.178]) by mail.alkar.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.9) with ESMTP id 422953400; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:46:17 +0200 Message-ID: <43C3D728.10008@oxygen.az> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:47:52 +0000 From: Tofik Suleymanov User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050404) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Giorgos Keramidas References: <43BFF797.9070600@oxygen.az> <20060107213025.GB2175@flame.pc> In-Reply-To: <20060107213025.GB2175@flame.pc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kernel debugging question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:46:21 -0000 Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >On 2006-01-07 17:17, Tofik Suleymanov wrote: > > >>Reading through http://www.netbsd.org i've met this: >> >> Forcing code to enter DDB >> >>Ensure your kernel config file contains '|options DDB|', the file has >>'|#include "opt_ddb.h"|', then use '|Debugger()|'. >> >>... >> >>Does this work on FreeBSD also ? >> >> > >This is slightly different in FreeBSD. You have to call: > > #include > > kdb_enter(NULL); /* Enter without a message */ > >or > > #include > > kdb_enter("Forced into debugger by Giorgos"); > > > Thank you :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 13:48:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B178D16A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:48:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67E7743D45 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:48:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 29909 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2006 13:48:04 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 10 Jan 2006 13:48:03 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 4811628423; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:48:03 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: shih@math.jussieu.fr References: <20060109090131.GY24383@math.jussieu.fr> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 10 Jan 2006 08:48:02 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20060109090131.GY24383@math.jussieu.fr> Message-ID: <443bjwtcrx.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 5 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsnap vs cvsup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:48:04 -0000 > What's the advantage of portsnap vs old-fashion cvsup ? The package description covers that. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/ports/sysutils/portsnap/pkg-descr?rev=1.2&content-type=text/plain From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 14:15:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F15F116A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:15:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 165A143D45 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:15:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 12174 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2006 14:15:24 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 10 Jan 2006 14:15:24 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 8477F28423; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:15:23 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: shih@math.jussieu.fr References: <20060109201228.GE5078@math.jussieu.fr> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 10 Jan 2006 09:15:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20060109201228.GE5078@math.jussieu.fr> Message-ID: <44y81orwxw.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 25 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: disk mapping X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:15:32 -0000 Albert Shih writes: > Hi all > > I've question about freebsd disk name. > > Actually I've a server to be change, but I don't change the disk array > (external) > > On my new server I've install a FreeBSD 5.4 (without the disk array because > it's on production). When I try to switch the old server by the new one, > the kernel don't boot because the disk is re-map. When I've install the > FreeBSD the / is on /dev/da0(s*) (this is without the disk array). But > after I plug the disk array and reboot this is the disk array to have > /dev/da0. And of course the kernel don't find the /. > > How can I fix this ?. I don't have the possibility to make many test or > install with the disk array plug (because it's on production). Figure out what SCSI bus the boot disk is on, and wire it down (see scsi(4) for syntax) so that you can specify a fixed disk in fstab(5). -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 14:26:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59A4F16A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:26:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bret-walker@northwestern.edu) Received: from hecky.it.northwestern.edu (hecky.it.northwestern.edu [129.105.16.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D65A543D45 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:26:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bret-walker@northwestern.edu) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (medill-bwpc.medill.northwestern.edu [129.105.51.23]) by hecky.it.northwestern.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C56332DDF for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:26:29 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <43C3C414.5090603@northwestern.edu> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:26:28 -0600 From: Bret Walker User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.2.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms050502030600010806000608" Subject: Discovering File System Corruption X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:26:35 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms050502030600010806000608 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I have a 6.0-RELEASE-p1 box with a GENERIC kerbnel that I'm having some trouble with. I recently reconstituted the machine from being a 5.4 box. I didn't upgrade, I reinstalled. When I was trying to install tripwire, kept getting this message: "./bin/i386-unknown-freebsd_r/siggen missing. Build did not complete successfully. *** Error code 1" I CVSupped a few times, even deleting the tripwire directory completely and letting CVSup re-add it. I finally fixed the problem by copying the missing file from another box. The maintainer of the the port wrote to me: " The missing files were missing from the distfile extraction, not the port. The distfile failed to extract properly. That indicates that either tar failed (unlikely) or that you have some kind of filesystem problem. You have a problem much more serious than a mere port that failed to build." I have run fsck in single user mode many times, each time coming back clean. I ran fsck -f -p, to make sure I wasn't having any problems like this ( http://freebsd.rambler.ru/bsdmail/freebsd-current_2003/msg04802.html ). How can I determine what is going on? Do I have filesystem corruption, or is something else going on? --------------ms050502030600010806000608 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIIDTCC AmEwggHKoAMCAQICAw826DANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFADBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UE ChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNv bmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwHhcNMDUwNzI4MTUyMjQyWhcNMDYwNzI4MTUyMjQy WjBOMR8wHQYDVQQDExZUaGF3dGUgRnJlZW1haWwgTWVtYmVyMSswKQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhxi cmV0LXdhbGtlckBub3J0aHdlc3Rlcm4uZWR1MIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKB gQDSCypw+5wpRl4ZlH6em39b5c5m5tm41n+OJpkv527owfrxHDhqtO7rOUEkVlgGdG0267WS vgSzhs0St7rCGPrVg+d7utJIrKJ8MCCh8/7pZXTLb29+57DypLvfk4WWoDVlKejzr9qqpkez /S33QTKgD0ODVwXFpXPdXyi2gyqFdwIDAQABozkwNzAnBgNVHREEIDAegRxicmV0LXdhbGtl ckBub3J0aHdlc3Rlcm4uZWR1MAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQADgYEAk3eV 7mbER7K4kjPo2RMV/r8toOOfN8z0UpzUyAkVNUAUE4gnIIDgBepL6AkBm86x9YDJtgZRkLW5 4H3YW4e7XfycRpIS6SoR5uWpHRVmeBNrAdfktltPDAvxJOzAef9N8Wt7SkjIH5qf8t33SfzA N+2KtXDhJhGFhDMzURaoYEEwggJhMIIByqADAgECAgMPNugwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQAwYjEL MAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAq BgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA1MDcyODE1 MjI0MloXDTA2MDcyODE1MjI0MlowTjEfMB0GA1UEAxMWVGhhd3RlIEZyZWVtYWlsIE1lbWJl cjErMCkGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYcYnJldC13YWxrZXJAbm9ydGh3ZXN0ZXJuLmVkdTCBnzANBgkq hkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAwgYkCgYEA0gsqcPucKUZeGZR+npt/W+XOZubZuNZ/jiaZL+du6MH6 8Rw4arTu6zlBJFZYBnRtNuu1kr4Es4bNEre6whj61YPne7rSSKyifDAgofP+6WV0y29vfuew 8qS735OFlqA1ZSno86/aqqZHs/0t90EyoA9Dg1cFxaVz3V8otoMqhXcCAwEAAaM5MDcwJwYD VR0RBCAwHoEcYnJldC13YWxrZXJAbm9ydGh3ZXN0ZXJuLmVkdTAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMA0G CSqGSIb3DQEBBAUAA4GBAJN3le5mxEeyuJIz6NkTFf6/LaDjnzfM9FKc1MgJFTVAFBOIJyCA 4AXqS+gJAZvOsfWAybYGUZC1ueB92FuHu138nEaSEukqEeblqR0VZngTawHX5LZbTwwL8STs wHn/TfFre0pIyB+an/Ld90n8wDftirVw4SYRhYQzM1EWqGBBMIIDPzCCAqigAwIBAgIBDTAN BgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADCB0TELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExFTATBgNVBAgTDFdlc3Rlcm4gQ2FwZTES MBAGA1UEBxMJQ2FwZSBUb3duMRowGAYDVQQKExFUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZzEoMCYGA1UE CxMfQ2VydGlmaWNhdGlvbiBTZXJ2aWNlcyBEaXZpc2lvbjEkMCIGA1UEAxMbVGhhd3RlIFBl cnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIENBMSswKQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhxwZXJzb25hbC1mcmVlbWFpbEB0 aGF3dGUuY29tMB4XDTAzMDcxNzAwMDAwMFoXDTEzMDcxNjIzNTk1OVowYjELMAkGA1UEBhMC WkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1Ro YXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GN ADCBiQKBgQDEpjxVc1X7TrnKmVoeaMB1BHCd3+n/ox7svc31W/Iadr1/DDph8r9RzgHU5VAK MNcCY1osiRVwjt3J8CuFWqo/cVbLrzwLB+fxH5E2JCoTzyvV84J3PQO+K/67GD4Hv0CAAmTX p6a7n2XRxSpUhQ9IBH+nttE8YQRAHmQZcmC3+wIDAQABo4GUMIGRMBIGA1UdEwEB/wQIMAYB Af8CAQAwQwYDVR0fBDwwOjA4oDagNIYyaHR0cDovL2NybC50aGF3dGUuY29tL1RoYXd0ZVBl cnNvbmFsRnJlZW1haWxDQS5jcmwwCwYDVR0PBAQDAgEGMCkGA1UdEQQiMCCkHjAcMRowGAYD VQQDExFQcml2YXRlTGFiZWwyLTEzODANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOBgQBIjNFQg+oLLswNo2as Zw9/r6y+whehQ5aUnX9MIbj4Nh+qLZ82L8D0HFAgk3A8/a3hYWLD2ToZfoSxmRsAxRoLgnSe JVCUYsfbJ3FXJY3dqZw5jowgT2Vfldr394fWxghOrvbqNOUQGls1TXfjViF4gtwhGTXeJLHT HUb/XV9lTzGCArowggK2AgEBMGkwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBD b25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFp bCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAgMPNugwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAacwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3 DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0BCQUxDxcNMDYwMTEwMTQyNjI4WjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQUlDfJ H1slYfoU/Y8vNAHbmipEmEAwUgYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMUUwQzAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG 9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgweAYJKwYB BAGCNxAEMWswaTBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcg KFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3Vpbmcg Q0ECAw826DB6BgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzFroGkwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRo YXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBG cmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAgMPNugwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEgYDQcoBDq1DGTGhngK15 Ct5bj5BbedZvRXgtRfdwNAv35EIxKrnCl4/UrBqXuWLaKGi2U+9+kX+XuoUfvO4pveIMMhrQ 2ZEcbfbh6zc8BzGvZD0T7xwWeoMc+r0p6N2RbKcg6MS9toklZEaeICG/0yGHVhQBA/4XGdip /3DtmSpcRQAAAAAAAA== --------------ms050502030600010806000608-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 14:42:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99D4516A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:42:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bret-walker@northwestern.edu) Received: from hecky.it.northwestern.edu (hecky.it.northwestern.edu [129.105.16.51]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E52043D49 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:42:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bret-walker@northwestern.edu) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (medill-bwpc.medill.northwestern.edu [129.105.51.23]) by hecky.it.northwestern.edu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B419E32DE7 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:42:21 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <43C3C7CD.1030401@northwestern.edu> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:42:21 -0600 From: Bret Walker User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.2.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/x-pkcs7-signature"; micalg=sha1; boundary="------------ms010408090108050401000604" Subject: [Fwd: Discovering File System Corruption] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:42:22 -0000 This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --------------ms010408090108050401000604 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I have a 6.0-RELEASE-p1 box with a GENERIC kerbnel that I'm having some trouble with. I recently reconstituted the machine from being a 5.4 box. I didn't upgrade, I reinstalled. When I was trying to install tripwire, kept getting this message: "./bin/i386-unknown-freebsd_r/siggen missing. Build did not complete successfully. *** Error code 1" I CVSupped a few times, even deleting the tripwire directory completely and letting CVSup re-add it. I finally fixed the problem by copying the missing file from another box. The maintainer of the the port wrote to me: " The missing files were missing from the distfile extraction, not the port. The distfile failed to extract properly. That indicates that either tar failed (unlikely) or that you have some kind of filesystem problem. You have a problem much more serious than a mere port that failed to build." I have run fsck in single user mode many times, each time coming back clean. I ran fsck -f -p, to make sure I wasn't having any problems like this ( http://freebsd.rambler.ru/bsdmail/freebsd-current_2003/msg04802.html ). How can I determine what is going on? Do I have filesystem corruption, or is something else going on? Thanks, Bret --------------ms010408090108050401000604 Content-Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature; name="smime.p7s" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="smime.p7s" Content-Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature MIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAqCAMIACAQExCzAJBgUrDgMCGgUAMIAGCSqGSIb3DQEHAQAAoIIIDTCC AmEwggHKoAMCAQICAw826DANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQQFADBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UE ChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcgKFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNv bmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3VpbmcgQ0EwHhcNMDUwNzI4MTUyMjQyWhcNMDYwNzI4MTUyMjQy WjBOMR8wHQYDVQQDExZUaGF3dGUgRnJlZW1haWwgTWVtYmVyMSswKQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhxi cmV0LXdhbGtlckBub3J0aHdlc3Rlcm4uZWR1MIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GNADCBiQKB gQDSCypw+5wpRl4ZlH6em39b5c5m5tm41n+OJpkv527owfrxHDhqtO7rOUEkVlgGdG0267WS vgSzhs0St7rCGPrVg+d7utJIrKJ8MCCh8/7pZXTLb29+57DypLvfk4WWoDVlKejzr9qqpkez /S33QTKgD0ODVwXFpXPdXyi2gyqFdwIDAQABozkwNzAnBgNVHREEIDAegRxicmV0LXdhbGtl ckBub3J0aHdlc3Rlcm4uZWR1MAwGA1UdEwEB/wQCMAAwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQADgYEAk3eV 7mbER7K4kjPo2RMV/r8toOOfN8z0UpzUyAkVNUAUE4gnIIDgBepL6AkBm86x9YDJtgZRkLW5 4H3YW4e7XfycRpIS6SoR5uWpHRVmeBNrAdfktltPDAvxJOzAef9N8Wt7SkjIH5qf8t33SfzA N+2KtXDhJhGFhDMzURaoYEEwggJhMIIByqADAgECAgMPNugwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEEBQAwYjEL MAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAq BgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMB4XDTA1MDcyODE1 MjI0MloXDTA2MDcyODE1MjI0MlowTjEfMB0GA1UEAxMWVGhhd3RlIEZyZWVtYWlsIE1lbWJl cjErMCkGCSqGSIb3DQEJARYcYnJldC13YWxrZXJAbm9ydGh3ZXN0ZXJuLmVkdTCBnzANBgkq hkiG9w0BAQEFAAOBjQAwgYkCgYEA0gsqcPucKUZeGZR+npt/W+XOZubZuNZ/jiaZL+du6MH6 8Rw4arTu6zlBJFZYBnRtNuu1kr4Es4bNEre6whj61YPne7rSSKyifDAgofP+6WV0y29vfuew 8qS735OFlqA1ZSno86/aqqZHs/0t90EyoA9Dg1cFxaVz3V8otoMqhXcCAwEAAaM5MDcwJwYD VR0RBCAwHoEcYnJldC13YWxrZXJAbm9ydGh3ZXN0ZXJuLmVkdTAMBgNVHRMBAf8EAjAAMA0G CSqGSIb3DQEBBAUAA4GBAJN3le5mxEeyuJIz6NkTFf6/LaDjnzfM9FKc1MgJFTVAFBOIJyCA 4AXqS+gJAZvOsfWAybYGUZC1ueB92FuHu138nEaSEukqEeblqR0VZngTawHX5LZbTwwL8STs wHn/TfFre0pIyB+an/Ld90n8wDftirVw4SYRhYQzM1EWqGBBMIIDPzCCAqigAwIBAgIBDTAN BgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFADCB0TELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExFTATBgNVBAgTDFdlc3Rlcm4gQ2FwZTES MBAGA1UEBxMJQ2FwZSBUb3duMRowGAYDVQQKExFUaGF3dGUgQ29uc3VsdGluZzEoMCYGA1UE CxMfQ2VydGlmaWNhdGlvbiBTZXJ2aWNlcyBEaXZpc2lvbjEkMCIGA1UEAxMbVGhhd3RlIFBl cnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIENBMSswKQYJKoZIhvcNAQkBFhxwZXJzb25hbC1mcmVlbWFpbEB0 aGF3dGUuY29tMB4XDTAzMDcxNzAwMDAwMFoXDTEzMDcxNjIzNTk1OVowYjELMAkGA1UEBhMC WkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1Ro YXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBMIGfMA0GCSqGSIb3DQEBAQUAA4GN ADCBiQKBgQDEpjxVc1X7TrnKmVoeaMB1BHCd3+n/ox7svc31W/Iadr1/DDph8r9RzgHU5VAK MNcCY1osiRVwjt3J8CuFWqo/cVbLrzwLB+fxH5E2JCoTzyvV84J3PQO+K/67GD4Hv0CAAmTX p6a7n2XRxSpUhQ9IBH+nttE8YQRAHmQZcmC3+wIDAQABo4GUMIGRMBIGA1UdEwEB/wQIMAYB Af8CAQAwQwYDVR0fBDwwOjA4oDagNIYyaHR0cDovL2NybC50aGF3dGUuY29tL1RoYXd0ZVBl cnNvbmFsRnJlZW1haWxDQS5jcmwwCwYDVR0PBAQDAgEGMCkGA1UdEQQiMCCkHjAcMRowGAYD VQQDExFQcml2YXRlTGFiZWwyLTEzODANBgkqhkiG9w0BAQUFAAOBgQBIjNFQg+oLLswNo2as Zw9/r6y+whehQ5aUnX9MIbj4Nh+qLZ82L8D0HFAgk3A8/a3hYWLD2ToZfoSxmRsAxRoLgnSe JVCUYsfbJ3FXJY3dqZw5jowgT2Vfldr394fWxghOrvbqNOUQGls1TXfjViF4gtwhGTXeJLHT HUb/XV9lTzGCArowggK2AgEBMGkwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRoYXd0ZSBD b25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBGcmVlbWFp bCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAgMPNugwCQYFKw4DAhoFAKCCAacwGAYJKoZIhvcNAQkDMQsGCSqGSIb3 DQEHATAcBgkqhkiG9w0BCQUxDxcNMDYwMTEwMTQ0MjIxWjAjBgkqhkiG9w0BCQQxFgQU8OhP 8O8b3BFr8uAhyVNKkxKhuGcwUgYJKoZIhvcNAQkPMUUwQzAKBggqhkiG9w0DBzAOBggqhkiG 9w0DAgICAIAwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICAUAwBwYFKw4DAgcwDQYIKoZIhvcNAwICASgweAYJKwYB BAGCNxAEMWswaTBiMQswCQYDVQQGEwJaQTElMCMGA1UEChMcVGhhd3RlIENvbnN1bHRpbmcg KFB0eSkgTHRkLjEsMCoGA1UEAxMjVGhhd3RlIFBlcnNvbmFsIEZyZWVtYWlsIElzc3Vpbmcg Q0ECAw826DB6BgsqhkiG9w0BCRACCzFroGkwYjELMAkGA1UEBhMCWkExJTAjBgNVBAoTHFRo YXd0ZSBDb25zdWx0aW5nIChQdHkpIEx0ZC4xLDAqBgNVBAMTI1RoYXd0ZSBQZXJzb25hbCBG cmVlbWFpbCBJc3N1aW5nIENBAgMPNugwDQYJKoZIhvcNAQEBBQAEgYCbXO/JIWLrZ2gAU92G qhNx3wN1dk+BOEgC/z3phM2ukPAAZ55KnicHUNBNX/JVBf/0o0cgvVcJ0Cor4W4cw2dMGpq0 dDM51Ipeqbq2ya+rEJAnAPKdgF8ijJ5gdVtAc57iaTRGntv+t2I2Njym3nUjn0hhrWQy3LIK M0gzgJfIKgAAAAAAAA== --------------ms010408090108050401000604-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 14:48:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABC1916A420; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:48:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tillman@seekingfire.com) Received: from mail.seekingfire.com (caliban.seekingfire.com [24.72.123.45]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E23843D5E; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:47:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tillman@seekingfire.com) Received: by mail.seekingfire.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 2C14664; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:47:58 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:47:58 -0600 From: Tillman Hodgson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060110144758.GU25702@seekingfire.com> References: <20060110081037.M29590@ozlerplastik.com> <20060110103114.M96459@ozlerplastik.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060110103114.M96459@ozlerplastik.com> X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to . X-GPG-Key-ID: 828AFC7B X-GPG-Fingerprint: 5584 14BA C9EB 1524 0E68 F543 0F0A 7FBC 828A FC7B X-GPG-Key: http://www.seekingfire.com/personal/gpg_key.asc X-Urban-Legend: There is lots of hidden information in headers X-Tillman-rules: yes he does User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: Subject: Re: Compaq ProLiant 1600 server freezes when detecting keyboard X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:48:02 -0000 On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 12:35:32PM +0200, Ertan K???ko?lu wrote: > Good news, > > System boots flawlessly after removing USB and Firewire in GENERIC kernel. [My apologies for not jumping into this thread early, in spite of Ertan's polite email of inquiry. Vacations, yada yada etc :-).] I can confirm this too. After my last go-around with this box I was able to get it running by removing uhci: [root@thoth /usr/src/sys/i386/conf]# uname -a FreeBSD thoth.seekingfire.com 7.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #0: Thu Dec 29 22:27:03 CST 2005 toor@thoth.seekingfire.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/THOTH i386 [root@thoth /usr/src/sys/i386/conf]# grep '###' THOTH ###device uhci # UHCI PCI->USB interface (### is the symbol I use for something that's been commented out for important reasons, so I don't later on mess with it) However, I'm occassionally seeing the box spontanouesly reboot: [root@thoth /usr/src/sys/i386/conf]# uptime 8:43AM up 17:42, 2 users, load averages: 0.01, 0.01, 0.06 It's not all that often, though I can occassionally trigger it with a buildworld/buildkernel (which is what killed it yesterday). [root@thoth /var/crash]# ls -l | grep Jan -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2 Jan 9 15:01 bounds -rw------- 1 root wheel 451 Jan 9 15:01 info.6 -rw------- 1 root wheel 268042240 Jan 9 15:02 vmcore.6 Debugging and invariants are turned off in the kernel, and I currently lack the knowledge to do much with the vmcore in any case :-) The crashes are very likely unrelated to the usb problem (this box also runs pf and ipsec, either of which could be unhappy). I'm interested in hearing about stability of other 1600Rs under load. -T -- "The truth of a proposition has nothing to do with its credibility. And vice versa." -- Robert Heinlein From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 14:48:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABC1916A420; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:48:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tillman@seekingfire.com) Received: from mail.seekingfire.com (caliban.seekingfire.com [24.72.123.45]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E23843D5E; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:47:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tillman@seekingfire.com) Received: by mail.seekingfire.com (Postfix, from userid 500) id 2C14664; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:47:58 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:47:58 -0600 From: Tillman Hodgson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060110144758.GU25702@seekingfire.com> References: <20060110081037.M29590@ozlerplastik.com> <20060110103114.M96459@ozlerplastik.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060110103114.M96459@ozlerplastik.com> X-Habeas-SWE-1: winter into spring X-Habeas-SWE-2: brightly anticipated X-Habeas-SWE-3: like Habeas SWE (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-4: Copyright 2002 Habeas (tm) X-Habeas-SWE-5: Sender Warranted Email (SWE) (tm). The sender of this X-Habeas-SWE-6: email in exchange for a license for this Habeas X-Habeas-SWE-7: warrant mark warrants that this is a Habeas Compliant X-Habeas-SWE-8: Message (HCM) and not spam. Please report use of this X-Habeas-SWE-9: mark in spam to . X-GPG-Key-ID: 828AFC7B X-GPG-Fingerprint: 5584 14BA C9EB 1524 0E68 F543 0F0A 7FBC 828A FC7B X-GPG-Key: http://www.seekingfire.com/personal/gpg_key.asc X-Urban-Legend: There is lots of hidden information in headers X-Tillman-rules: yes he does User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: Subject: Re: Compaq ProLiant 1600 server freezes when detecting keyboard X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:48:02 -0000 On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 12:35:32PM +0200, Ertan K???ko?lu wrote: > Good news, > > System boots flawlessly after removing USB and Firewire in GENERIC kernel. [My apologies for not jumping into this thread early, in spite of Ertan's polite email of inquiry. Vacations, yada yada etc :-).] I can confirm this too. After my last go-around with this box I was able to get it running by removing uhci: [root@thoth /usr/src/sys/i386/conf]# uname -a FreeBSD thoth.seekingfire.com 7.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #0: Thu Dec 29 22:27:03 CST 2005 toor@thoth.seekingfire.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/THOTH i386 [root@thoth /usr/src/sys/i386/conf]# grep '###' THOTH ###device uhci # UHCI PCI->USB interface (### is the symbol I use for something that's been commented out for important reasons, so I don't later on mess with it) However, I'm occassionally seeing the box spontanouesly reboot: [root@thoth /usr/src/sys/i386/conf]# uptime 8:43AM up 17:42, 2 users, load averages: 0.01, 0.01, 0.06 It's not all that often, though I can occassionally trigger it with a buildworld/buildkernel (which is what killed it yesterday). [root@thoth /var/crash]# ls -l | grep Jan -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 2 Jan 9 15:01 bounds -rw------- 1 root wheel 451 Jan 9 15:01 info.6 -rw------- 1 root wheel 268042240 Jan 9 15:02 vmcore.6 Debugging and invariants are turned off in the kernel, and I currently lack the knowledge to do much with the vmcore in any case :-) The crashes are very likely unrelated to the usb problem (this box also runs pf and ipsec, either of which could be unhappy). I'm interested in hearing about stability of other 1600Rs under load. -T -- "The truth of a proposition has nothing to do with its credibility. And vice versa." -- Robert Heinlein From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 14:52:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0FB916A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:52:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@easymac.org) Received: from house.easymac.org (207-172-223-206.c3-0.wth-ubr2.sbo-wth.ma.cable.rcn.com [207.172.223.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F5EB43D45 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:52:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@easymac.org) Received: from [192.168.169.130] (firewall.studsvik-analytic.com [155.212.59.75]) (authenticated bits=0) by house.easymac.org (8.12.8p1/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k0AGGRS8094241 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:16:27 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from chris@easymac.org) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <817D1A74-81D0-495B-BCC4-163A9E90879C@easymac.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Christopher Umina Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:52:23 -0500 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Subject: ADIC FastStor 2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:52:13 -0000 Hello, I'm currently running multiple FreeBSD 5.4 systems, but I'm looking to do backup services on three specific systems. A friend told me to look into ADIC autochangers and I think the FastStor 2 is adequate. I was wondering if this autochanger is compatible with FreeBSD 5.4. I don't see it on the hardware compatibility list, but Google shows me lists where its in people's dmesg's. Secondly, I was looking into Veritas as a backup utility. I was wondering thoughts on the Veritas system on FreeBSD. Thank you, Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 14:59:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E893816A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:59:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from speechpro.com (speech-tech-2.ip.PeterStar.net [81.3.190.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62FD243D48 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:59:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from sysadm.stc ([192.168.2.26]) by s1.stc with esmtp (Exim 4.53 (FreeBSD)) id 1EwKyX-000Hov-S3 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:59:53 +0300 Received: from localhost.stc ([127.0.0.1] helo=sysadm.stc) by sysadm.stc with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1EwKy6-00065x-67 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:59:26 +0300 Received: (from igorr@localhost) by sysadm.stc (8.13.4/8.13.3/Submit) id k0AExPkv023383 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:59:25 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from igorr) Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:59:25 +0300 From: Igor Robul To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060110145925.GA1117@sysadm.stc> References: <51d7a5160601021759p4c3b8938h71af7df5800470cb@mail.gmail.com> <43BA4193.7010007@cs.tu-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43BA4193.7010007@cs.tu-berlin.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archived: Yes Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6.0 AMD64 Dont Detect My PCIExpress Card...? Radeon X300. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:59:56 -0000 On Tue, Jan 03, 2006 at 10:19:15AM +0100, Bj?rn K?nig wrote: > Buy an Nvidia card if you need 3D support necessarily, because Nvidia > offers drivers for FreeBSD. ATI does not; they support Linux only. Nvidia does not provide drivers for FreeBSD on AMD64. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 15:01:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A149716A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:01:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4617743D67 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:01:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9]) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.5+UW05.10/8.13.5+UW05.09) with ESMTP id k0AF1XD3021204 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:01:33 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.23] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.5+UW05.10/8.13.5+UW05.09) with ESMTP id k0AF1WTW010598 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:01:33 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) In-Reply-To: References: <20060109195342.GA35789@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Garrett Cooper Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:02:26 -0800 To: FreeBSD Questions X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __LINES_OF_YELLING 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' Subject: Re: replacement for Acrobat Professional? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:01:35 -0000 On Jan 9, 2006, at 5:30 PM, Denny White wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > On Jan 9 Michael W. Lucas contributed the following: >> >> Hi folks, >> >> I've been handed a whole bunch of PDFs and asked to make my comments >> directly in them. I'm sure there's something in ports that can do >> that, but my search hasn't turned up anything. (Of course, I really >> have no idea what I'm looking for, which hampers the search. :-) >> >> Any suggestions on a replacement for or equivalent to Acrobat Pro? >> >> I'm on a -current box running i386. >> >> Thanks for any pointers, >> >> ==ml >> >> >> -- >> Michael W. Lucas mwlucas@FreeBSD.org, mwlucas@BlackHelicopters.org >> http://www.BlackHelicopters.org/~mwlucas/ >> >> "The cloak of anonymity protects me from the nuisance of caring." - >> Non Sequitur > > Michael, > Here are some links. Hope they help. > Denny White > > http://www.accesspdf.com > http://www.freebsdsoftware.org/print/flpsed.html > http://pdfhacks.com/pdftk (don't overlook the Vim plugin part) > > > Please do not CC me. Already subscribed to mailing list. > > GnuPG key : 0x1644E79A | http://wwwkeys.nl.pgp.net > Fingerprint: D0A9 AD44 1F10 E09E 0E67 EC25 CB44 F2E5 1644 E79A > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (OpenBSD) > > iD8DBQFDww5Ny0Ty5RZE55oRAplfAJ9ekbutngwMe8KZgLhJhnaIORMK0ACgza2+ > 2sqjq18VT5AK5Q3lqA5VG7I= > =tszC > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- Ghostscript is a wonderful package too, and it let's you make more than just PDFs... -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 15:03:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E859416A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:03:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7261243D8A for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:03:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.5+UW05.10/8.13.5+UW05.09) with ESMTP id k0AF31Wn021389 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:03:01 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [192.168.0.23] (dsl254-013-145.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.254.13.145]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.5+UW05.10/8.13.5+UW05.09) with ESMTP id k0AF30hi005774 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:03:01 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) In-Reply-To: <1136881768.591.1.camel@p4-3200.local> References: <20060110090130.67517.qmail@ssr.com> <1136881768.591.1.camel@p4-3200.local> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Garrett Cooper Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:03:54 -0800 To: FreeBSD Questions X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' Subject: Re: System time suddenly changed after reboot. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:03:34 -0000 On Jan 10, 2006, at 12:29 AM, Andreas Rudisch wrote: > On Tue, 2006-01-10 at 09:01 +0000, Scott Ballantyne wrote: >> Running 5.3-RELEASE. >> >> After many years of using FreeBSD, and as many reboots or more, I had >> occasion to reboot today, and a few hours later discovered to my >> horror that the system time had suddenly been moved ahead to the year >> 2020! >> >> I did the best I could with the resulting mess, but I am curious if >> anyone else has seen this, or what would cause it. This is the same >> hardware I have been running for a couple of years now, and I haven't >> changed anything in the bios or system. >> >> Thanks, >> Scott > > Just an idea, but maybe the BIOS battery ran out of power and needs to > be replaced. > > Andreas > > -- > GnuPG key : 0x2A573565 | http://cyb.websimplex.de/pubkey.asc > Fingerprint: 925D 2089 0BF9 8DE5 9166 33BB F0FD CD37 2A57 3565 Interesting though. Usually clocks get set back to 1972, or somewhere around that era. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 15:09:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D045616A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:09:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from speechpro.com (speech-tech-2.ip.PeterStar.net [81.3.190.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6381243D4C for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:09:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from sysadm.stc ([192.168.2.26]) by s1.stc with esmtp (Exim 4.53 (FreeBSD)) id 1EwL7s-000IBU-LZ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:09:33 +0300 Received: from localhost.stc ([127.0.0.1] helo=sysadm.stc) by sysadm.stc with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1EwL7R-000AMw-3o for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:09:05 +0300 Received: (from igorr@localhost) by sysadm.stc (8.13.4/8.13.3/Submit) id k0AF9573039861 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:09:05 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from igorr) Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:09:05 +0300 From: Igor Robul To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060110150905.GB1117@sysadm.stc> References: <43BDEBCB.9060000@mykitchentable.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43BDEBCB.9060000@mykitchentable.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archived: Yes Subject: Re: What User Runs Startup Scripts? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:09:36 -0000 On Thu, Jan 05, 2006 at 08:02:19PM -0800, Drew Tomlinson wrote: > 1514, header 14 > Jan 5 19:51:31 blacksheep ntop[611]: **ERROR** pcap_open_live(): > 'BIOCSETIF: tun0: Device not configured' > Jan 5 19:51:31 blacksheep ntop[611]: Please correct the problem or > select a different interface using the -i flag > Jan 5 19:51:31 blacksheep ntop[611]: **FATAL_ERROR** Not root, ntop > shutting down... Do you have tun0 interface on boot time? Are you activating ppp manually? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 15:42:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5C9F16A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:42:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marko@freebsd.org) Received: from pih-relay06.plus.net (pih-relay06.plus.net [212.159.14.133]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55E2043D46 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:42:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from marko@freebsd.org) Received: from [80.229.231.20] (helo=[192.168.1.4]) by pih-relay06.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1EwLds-0004du-ML for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:42:36 +0000 Message-ID: <43C3D627.4040808@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:43:35 +0000 From: Mark Ovens User-Agent: Mail/News 1.6a1 (X11/20051228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Virtual CD drive for FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:42:38 -0000 Is there such a thing as a virtual CD drive in the Ports. Something that allows you to treat an ISO image file - data or audio - as though it were a real CD in a real drive? Like Nero ImageDrive in Windows. TIA Regards, Mark From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 15:47:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30D2B16A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:47:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paul.khavkine@distributel.ca) Received: from ottexbe01.corp.distributel.ca (ottexbe01.corp.distributel.ca [206.80.252.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A71F743D46 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:47:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paul.khavkine@distributel.ca) Received: from 10.14.61.42 ([10.14.61.42]) by ottexbe01.corp.distributel.ca ([192.168.16.70]) via Exchange Front-End Server 10.14.61.70 ([10.14.61.70]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:47:23 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-Gmg/PKeL/Kwo0WBmHEKx" Received: from paul.mtl.distributel.net by 10.14.61.70; 10 Jan 2006 10:49:26 -0500 In-Reply-To: Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:49:26 -0500 Message-ID: <1136908166.45759.0.camel@paul> X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Abort signal thread-index: AcYV/SX/kvqneOlPT5WyDmZiLZWisw== References: <1136835510.44457.5.camel@paul> <2A6E6A56-4512-4F2D-9290-BD0D1599D34D@mac.com> <1136836338.44457.9.camel@paul> From: "Paul Khavkine" To: "Charles Swiger" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Abort signal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:47:24 -0000 --=-Gmg/PKeL/Kwo0WBmHEKx Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Chuck. Ran memtest86 over night and no memory errors. Any other ideas ? Thanx Paul On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 15:22 -0500, Charles Swiger wrote: > On Jan 9, 2006, at 2:52 PM, Paul Khavkine wrote: > > When i do that it crashes also but produces gdb.core > > The backtrace form that doesn't tell me anything about where it > > happends. >=20 > If gdb itself crashes, I would suspect you've got hardware problems =20 > like bad memory. Try running memtest86.org's RAM tester overnight =20 > and see whether it picks up anything... >=20 --=-Gmg/PKeL/Kwo0WBmHEKx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iQCVAwUAQ8PXhvkjFY05CfyYAQK28gP+PKPEdZ6X+wUUUUgxT/n1O++HONhdkTpM vPsypHHNWknmM2hFEb9VgsLaTv5N6YPYg3QMq+h4eIVvy2fExsnxJpcqeZzPo7uM qEBfdM+P2Pfqoxb7+o65rp5QBVuiARotsgKflUrvw+04D0PJ/aD1aBVx5F62xI5x 2Jms2ouZUKo= =D6lp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-Gmg/PKeL/Kwo0WBmHEKx-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 15:50:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9784216A422 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:50:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sveinhal@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8EA543D45 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:50:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sveinhal@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so2718064wxc for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:50:34 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=unJwG07FGr1FyfxcmYofzX7pExnz4qjZ5gnJ4RPkGnuYkAorg1LcucuU7UK8vNNO1INxa7N9I3JK+B7hasdarxl6HDpsWAVVSM2GH0EdyYqSGcS+HdyMY3SUnyz+21pD8TjG2rLpUcgPrtP7rtNk3OYwggpT4julqGbBDUYQO1k= Received: by 10.70.108.5 with SMTP id g5mr10225437wxc; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:50:34 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.105.11 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 07:50:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:50:34 +0100 From: Svein Halvor Halvorsen Sender: sveinhal@gmail.com To: Mark Ovens In-Reply-To: <43C3D627.4040808@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <43C3D627.4040808@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Virtual CD drive for FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:50:36 -0000 On 1/10/06, Mark Ovens wrote: > Is there such a thing as a virtual CD drive in the Ports. Something that > allows you to treat an ISO image file - data or audio - as though it > were a real CD in a real drive? Like Nero ImageDrive in Windows. Look no further than the base system. mdconfig(8) the image file, and then mount_cd9660(8) the device node. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 15:52:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B16B416A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:52:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gandalf@messias.qhigh.com) Received: from smtp.enternet.hu (smtp.enternet.hu [62.112.192.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C42E43D78 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:52:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gandalf@messias.qhigh.com) Received: from [62.68.174.65] (helo=[172.16.0.26]) by smtp.enternet.hu with esmtpa (Exim 4) id 1EwLmz-000CsU-8g for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:52:01 +0100 Message-ID: <43C3D84D.3050907@messias.qhigh.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:52:45 +0100 From: gandalf User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Xorg - how to disable some video modes? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:52:07 -0000 > > You seem to know more than me the xorg.conf file. What happened if you > separate > your Modes like this: > > Modes "1024x768_100.00" "1280x1024_85.00" > > Mine are separated and all works fine. If you can't find answer before > 7 p.m. > (GMT) I will test some changes on my config. Thanks for trying. It does not work for me. I found that xfce4's control panel is able to switch between 1024x768, 800x600 and 640x480. (Xfce also resizes the virtual size.) I don't know how it can do it because theoretically the only valid modes are 1024x768 and 1280x1024. If I remove "DefaultDepth 24" then Ctrl-Alt-Plus works fine and I'm able to switch from 1900x1440 to 640x480; but then the default mode becomes 1900x1440 again :-( Les From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 15:57:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0EDE16A41F; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:57:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from sccrmhc13.comcast.net (sccrmhc13.comcast.net [204.127.202.64]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 176FC43D48; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:57:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e.schuele@computer.org) Received: from [208.206.151.59] (host59.gtisd.com[208.206.151.59]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc13) with ESMTP id <200601101557430130089plce>; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:57:43 +0000 Message-ID: <43C3D975.4000906@computer.org> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:57:41 -0600 From: Eric Schuele User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051220) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Ovens References: <43C3D627.4040808@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <43C3D627.4040808@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Virtual CD drive for FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:57:46 -0000 Mark Ovens wrote: > Is there such a thing as a virtual CD drive in the Ports. Something that > allows you to treat an ISO image file - data or audio - as though it > were a real CD in a real drive? Like Nero ImageDrive in Windows. > > TIA > > Regards, > > Mark > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > man mdconfig -- Regards, Eric From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 15:58:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA26316A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:58:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from speechpro.com (speech-tech-2.ip.PeterStar.net [81.3.190.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B14E43D49 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:58:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from sysadm.stc ([192.168.2.26]) by s1.stc with esmtp (Exim 4.53 (FreeBSD)) id 1EwLtW-000Jlj-NG for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:58:46 +0300 Received: from localhost.stc ([127.0.0.1] helo=sysadm.stc) by sysadm.stc with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1EwLt4-00062y-Tx for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:58:19 +0300 Received: (from igorr@localhost) by sysadm.stc (8.13.4/8.13.3/Submit) id k0AFwItW023231 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:58:18 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from igorr) Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:58:17 +0300 From: Igor Robul To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060110155817.GC1117@sysadm.stc> References: <43C3D627.4040808@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43C3D627.4040808@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archived: Yes Subject: Re: Virtual CD drive for FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:58:48 -0000 On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 03:43:35PM +0000, Mark Ovens wrote: > Is there such a thing as a virtual CD drive in the Ports. Something that > allows you to treat an ISO image file - data or audio - as though it > were a real CD in a real drive? Like Nero ImageDrive in Windows. md(4) mdconfig -a -t vnode -f your_iso.iso then it prints name of device (in my case md1) then mount_cd9660 /dev/md1 /mnt and after you have finished umount /mnt mdconfig -d -u 1 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 16:00:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D890F16A41F; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:00:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@zero.nolaf.net) Received: from zero.nolaf.net (nolaf.net [65.98.54.149]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64FD243D49; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:00:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mike@zero.nolaf.net) Received: by zero.nolaf.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8D44E1FB57; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:04:03 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zero.nolaf.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 893CE1FB56; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:04:03 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:04:03 -0500 (EST) From: Michael McDowell To: Eric Schuele In-Reply-To: <43C3D975.4000906@computer.org> Message-ID: <20060110110302.I8280@zero.nolaf.net> References: <43C3D627.4040808@freebsd.org> <43C3D975.4000906@computer.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Mark Ovens Subject: Re: Virtual CD drive for FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:00:15 -0000 FreeBSD is very upto date :-) Michael On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, Eric Schuele wrote: > Mark Ovens wrote: >> Is there such a thing as a virtual CD drive in the Ports. Something that >> allows you to treat an ISO image file - data or audio - as though it were a >> real CD in a real drive? Like Nero ImageDrive in Windows. >> >> TIA >> >> Regards, >> >> Mark >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > man mdconfig > > -- > Regards, > Eric > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 16:13:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E5BB16A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:13:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A06D043D45 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:13:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D9962C83C; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:13:44 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 35763-03; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:13:44 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-222-82-85.eastlink.ca [24.222.82.85]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B66A62C82A; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:13:44 -0400 (AST) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9EA3C3EAD2; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:13:41 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CB9A3D5B4; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:13:41 -0400 (AST) Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:13:40 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Ted Mittelstaedt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20060110121226.P48499@ganymede.hub.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: My new DL360 G4P just arrived ... is it Dual-Core? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:13:46 -0000 On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > I think it means if you want the second dual core processor you > have to order it from HP and install it. Kind of like a car that's sold > with A/C but when you go to take delivery you find no AC and the > salesman says "That's an add-on option that costs another $1000" > > Did you open the unit? Is there an empty socket? Yes ... but, what I'm more curious about is how do I know that the first CPU is Dual-Core? When I boot the machine without an OS, it just reports one CPU, but is that to be expected until I get the OS up itself? Or shoudl the POST screens be showing it as two CPUs (4 if I had a second Dual Core in it?) ... or, are all Xeon's now Dual-Core, period? Thanks ... > > Ted > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Marc >> G. Fournier >> Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 9:36 PM >> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> Subject: My new DL360 G4P just arrived ... is it Dual-Core? >> >> >> >> 'k, I'm a bit confused, since I didn't quite get what I was >> looking for, but it >> was what I ordered *sigh* And, in fact, might actually be what >> I want without >> realizing it ... >> >> basically, I wanted a Dual Xeon server ... got a Single one ... >> looking at the >> HP web site, though, I see: >> >> "Powerful HP ProLiant DL360 G4p is now available Dual-core >> 2.8GHz Intel Xeon >> processors that offer 22MB L2 cache and 64-bit support." >> >> Does this mean that my CPUs *are* Dual-Core, or just that I can >> order them that >> way? Will Dual-Core show two processors in POST, or is it not >> until I get >> to the OS itself that I see both? >> >> >> >> >> ---- >> Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services > (http://www.hub.org) > Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: > 7615664 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.15/223 - Release Date: 1/6/2006 > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 16:29:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1B3E16A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:29:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gandalf@messias.qhigh.com) Received: from messias.qhigh.com (3e44ae41.adsl.enternet.hu [62.68.174.65]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49CA843D45 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:29:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gandalf@messias.qhigh.com) Received: from [172.16.0.26] (earth.msnet [172.16.0.26]) by messias.qhigh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54BD15C3F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:35:49 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43C3E12C.3080001@messias.qhigh.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:30:36 +0100 From: User Gandalf User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051228) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Native voip software for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:29:57 -0000 Hello, Do you know any native voip software for FreeBSD? I hate to install Linux compatibility mode just to have skype working. Thanks, Les From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 16:38:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AF8F16A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:38:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from graham.lewis@spitfire.co.uk) Received: from mail.spitfireuk.net (mail.spitfireuk.net [217.13.128.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2456943D45 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:38:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from graham.lewis@spitfire.co.uk) Received: from [217.13.128.68] (helo=exchange.domain) by mail.spitfireuk.net with esmtp (Exim 4.24; FreeBSD) id 1EwMW8-000HU0-6h; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:38:40 +0000 Received: by exchange with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) id ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:20:30 -0000 Message-ID: <5FFC541C3108D7428648163A6D0B0351F450BD@exchange2.domain.local> From: Graham Lewis To: "'Marc G. Fournier'" , Ted Mittelstaedt Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:38:29 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: My new DL360 G4P just arrived ... is it Dual-Core? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:38:42 -0000 Run "systat" if it shows two CPUs you have dual core. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Marc G. Fournier Sent: 10 January 2006 16:14 To: Ted Mittelstaedt Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: My new DL360 G4P just arrived ... is it Dual-Core? On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > I think it means if you want the second dual core processor you > have to order it from HP and install it. Kind of like a car that's sold > with A/C but when you go to take delivery you find no AC and the > salesman says "That's an add-on option that costs another $1000" > > Did you open the unit? Is there an empty socket? Yes ... but, what I'm more curious about is how do I know that the first CPU is Dual-Core? When I boot the machine without an OS, it just reports one CPU, but is that to be expected until I get the OS up itself? Or shoudl the POST screens be showing it as two CPUs (4 if I had a second Dual Core in it?) ... or, are all Xeon's now Dual-Core, period? Thanks ... > > Ted > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Marc >> G. Fournier >> Sent: Monday, January 09, 2006 9:36 PM >> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> Subject: My new DL360 G4P just arrived ... is it Dual-Core? >> >> >> >> 'k, I'm a bit confused, since I didn't quite get what I was >> looking for, but it >> was what I ordered *sigh* And, in fact, might actually be what >> I want without >> realizing it ... >> >> basically, I wanted a Dual Xeon server ... got a Single one ... >> looking at the >> HP web site, though, I see: >> >> "Powerful HP ProLiant DL360 G4p is now available Dual-core >> 2.8GHz Intel Xeon >> processors that offer 22MB L2 cache and 64-bit support." >> >> Does this mean that my CPUs *are* Dual-Core, or just that I can >> order them that >> way? Will Dual-Core show two processors in POST, or is it not >> until I get >> to the OS itself that I see both? >> >> >> >> >> ---- >> Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services > (http://www.hub.org) > Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: > 7615664 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.15/223 - Release Date: 1/6/2006 > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 16:52:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8670516A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:52:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DB5043D45 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:52:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7730D62C85F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:52:27 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 43027-06 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:52:27 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-222-82-85.eastlink.ca [24.222.82.85]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1534F62C855 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:52:26 -0400 (AST) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5FA3E3C9FE; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:52:25 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31F8137119 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:52:25 -0400 (AST) Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:52:24 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060110125050.A48499@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org Subject: Dual Core vs HyperThreading vs Dual CPU X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:52:28 -0000 I'm going to assume that Dual Core is better (can't believe that they took a step back) ... but, is how does it rate? I know that HyperThreading is definitely != Dual CPU ... but how close does Dual Core get? ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 16:54:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 907E916A420 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:54:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dennisolvany@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7927743D49 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:54:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dennisolvany@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i20so3818943wra for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:54:20 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=qSDgrK1k+ooc24TFIGTxqycxkRsiaMq06ex1yeSkM98+awTBJW69TkUdRZHFwfKKOKC2hyPl7UyWZp/ySoZHlPB39YhLkW82B1Ep8O47mCaYZumTzNx7YvqoKePRvzK1BiF/IYG8GBu/DtJ9wXMTNYyezYSDWNaWMZr4sw4U9uQ= Received: by 10.54.110.19 with SMTP id i19mr9690390wrc; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:54:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.10.2? ( [67.102.60.210]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 27sm11821639wrl.2006.01.10.08.54.19; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:54:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <43C3E684.5040204@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:53:24 -0600 From: Dennis Olvany User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051129) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Fremantle References: <43C3896A.7090704@skyhawk.ca> In-Reply-To: <43C3896A.7090704@skyhawk.ca> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 OpenPGP: id=D71A85AB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Advanced IPFW2 Forward rule problem / bug / misunderstanding X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:54:22 -0000 This should get you most of the way there or at least give you a good idea of what's required. > options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD_EXTENDED I'm pretty sure this will be required. > defaultrouter="24.85.92.1" > ifconfig_rl0="192.168.1.1" > ifconfig_vr0="142.179.109.xxx netmask 255.255.248.0" > ifconfig_vr1="216.232.85.xxx netmask 255.255.254.0" > ifconfig_rue0="24.85.9x.xxx netmask 255.255.252.0" > ifconfig_rue0_alias0="24.85.9x.xxx netmask 255.255.255.255" > Telus > ext1_ip="142.179.109.xxx" # IP Address > ext1_gw="142.179.104.254" # IP Gateway > ext2_ip="216.232.85.xxx" # IP Address > ext2_gw="216.232.84.254" # IP Gateway > Shaw Cable > shaw_ip="24.85.93.xxx" # IP Address > shaw_gw="24.85.92.1" # IP Gateway > srv2_ext="24.85.93.xxx" # External IP of server > INTERNAL > int_ip="192.168.1.1" # IP Address > # And run our new NATd > /sbin/natd -log_ipfw_denied -i ${nat_in} -o ${nat_out} -s -m -u -n > ${shaw} -punch_fw 36000:100 -redirect_port tcp ${ext1_srv}:22 > ${ext1_ip}:xxxx -redirect_port tcp ${ext1_srv}:53 ${ext1_ip}:53 > -redirect_port tcp ${ext1_srv}:80 ${ext1_ip}:80 -redirect_port tcp > ${ext1_srv}:443 ${ext1_ip}:443 -redirect_port udp ${ext1_srv}:53 > ${ext1_ip}:53 -redirect_port tcp ${ext2_srv}:80 ${ext2_ip}:80 > -redirect_port tcp ${ext2_srv}:443 ${ext2_ip}:443 -redirect_port tcp > ${srv1_int}:22 ${shaw_ip}:xxxx -redirect_port tcp ${srv1_int}:53 > ${shaw_ip}:53 -redirect_port udp ${srv1_int}:53 ${shaw_ip}:53 > -redirect_port tcp ${srv1_int}:80 ${shaw_ip}:80 -redirect_port tcp > ${srv1_int}:443 ${shaw_ip}:443 -redirect_port tcp ${srv2_int}:80 > ${srv2_ext}:80 -redirect_port tcp ${srv2_int}:443 ${srv2_ext}:443 That's a hefty nat command. Let's simplfy by putting it in a file. I leave the port forwarding to you. /etc/rc.conf natd_enable="yes" natd_flags="-f /etc/natd.conf" /etc/natd.conf instance default interface vr0 port 8668 instance telus2 interface vr1 port 8669 instance shaw1 alias_address 24.85.93.xxx port 8670 instance shaw2 alias_address 24.85.93.xxx port 8671 globalport 8672 I see that your firewall is based on rc.firewall. Forget rc.firewall, it is junk. Base your firewall on this structure. 1. Public Interface NAT Diversion 2. check-state 3. Public Interface Leak Prevention 3.1 deny egress from internal hosts 3.2 deny ingress to internal hosts 4. Antispoof 4.1 allow via loopback interface 4.2 deny ingress from router 4.3 deny ingress from internal hosts via public interface 5. Router 5.1 allow egress 5.2 deny egress 5.3 allow ingress 5.4 deny ingress 6. Internal Hosts 6.1 allow egress 6.2 deny egress 6.3 allow ingress 6.4 deny ingress 7. Default Deny /etc/rc.conf firewall_enable="yes" firewall_type="/etc/ipfw.rules" /etc/ipfw.rules -f flush add divert 8668 ip from any to any in via vr0 add divert 8669 ip from any to any in via vr1 add divert 8670 ip from any to 24.85.93.xxx in via rue0 add divert 8671 ip from any to 24.85.93.xxx in via rue0 #have never known the globalport to work on inbound add divert 8672 ip from any to any out via { vr0 or vr1 or rue0 } #not sure if that 'or' will work... may need to split it up check-state add deny ip from 192.168.1.1/24 to any via { vr0 or vr1 or rue0 } add allow ip from me to me via lo0 keep-state add deny ip from me to any in add allow ip from me to { me or 192.168.1.1/24 or 142.179.109.xxx/21 or 216.232.85.xxx/23 or 24.85.9x.xxx/22 } keep-state add forward 142.179.104.254 ip from 142.179.109.xxx to any keep-state add forward 216.232.84.254 ip from 216.232.85.xxx to any keep-state add forward 24.85.92.1 ip from 24.85.9x.xxx to any keep-state add forward 24.85.92.1 ip from 24.85.9x.xxx to any keep-state add allow ip from me to any keep-state add deny ip from me to any add allow icmp from any to me icmptypes 3,4,8,11 keep-state add deny ip from any to me add allow ip from 192.168.1.1/24 to any keep-state add deny ip from 192.168.1.1/24 to any add allow icmp from any to 192.168.1.1/24 icmptypes 3,4,11 keep-state add deny ip from any to 192.168.1.1/24 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 17:03:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E0E616A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:03:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from apircalabu@bitdefender.com) Received: from mail.bitdefender.com (ns.bitdefender.com [217.156.83.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAA8C43D77 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:03:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from apircalabu@bitdefender.com) Received: (qmail 20739 invoked by uid 1010); 10 Jan 2006 19:03:20 +0200 Received: from apircalabu.dsd.ro (10.10.15.22) by mail.bitdefender.com with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 10 Jan 2006 19:03:20 +0200 Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:02:30 +0200 From: Adi Pircalabu To: "Paul Khavkine" Message-ID: <20060110190230.22c63818@apircalabu.dsd.ro> In-Reply-To: <1136908166.45759.0.camel@paul> References: <1136835510.44457.5.camel@paul> <2A6E6A56-4512-4F2D-9290-BD0D1599D34D@mac.com> <1136836338.44457.9.camel@paul> <1136908166.45759.0.camel@paul> Organization: BitDefender X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.100 (GTK+ 2.8.9; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BitDefender-SpamStamp: 1.1.4 049000040111AAAAAAE X-BitDefender-Scanner: Clean, Agent: BitDefender Qmail 1.6.2 on mail.bitdefender.com X-BitDefender-Spam: No (0) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Abort signal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:03:32 -0000 On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:49:26 -0500 "Paul Khavkine" wrote: > > > Hi Chuck. > > Ran memtest86 over night and no memory errors. > > > Any other ideas ? Maybe some sysctl magic? See below: $ ./a.out Abort trap: 6 (core dumped) # sysctl -w kern.coredump=0 kern.coredump: 1 -> 0 $ ./a.out Abort trap: 6 (No corefile here, see?) # sysctl -w kern.coredump=1 kern.coredump: 0 -> 1 $ ./a.out Abort trap: 6 (core dumped) > > Thanx > Paul > > On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 15:22 -0500, Charles Swiger wrote: > > On Jan 9, 2006, at 2:52 PM, Paul Khavkine wrote: > > > When i do that it crashes also but produces gdb.core > > > The backtrace form that doesn't tell me anything about where it > > > happends. > > > > If gdb itself crashes, I would suspect you've got hardware > > problems like bad memory. Try running memtest86.org's RAM tester > > overnight and see whether it picks up anything... > > -- Adi Pircalabu (PGP Key ID 0x04329F5E) -- This message was scanned for spam and viruses by BitDefender. For more information please visit http://www.bitdefender.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 17:27:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEA4D16A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:27:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paul.khavkine@distributel.ca) Received: from ottexbe01.corp.distributel.ca (ottexbe01.corp.distributel.ca [206.80.252.36]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 687C343D45 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:27:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from paul.khavkine@distributel.ca) Received: from 10.14.61.42 ([10.14.61.42]) by ottexbe01.corp.distributel.ca ([192.168.16.70]) via Exchange Front-End Server 10.14.61.70 ([10.14.61.70]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:27:41 +0000 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-wLBftG5gl9Sa76rQYypg" Received: from paul.mtl.distributel.net by 10.14.61.70; 10 Jan 2006 12:29:44 -0500 In-Reply-To: Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:29:44 -0500 Message-ID: <1136914184.45759.12.camel@paul> X-MS-Has-Attach: yes X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Abort signal thread-index: AcYWCyjWXHMCOYCPSPSZfBGzGdRyQw== References: <1136835510.44457.5.camel@paul> <2A6E6A56-4512-4F2D-9290-BD0D1599D34D@mac.com> <1136836338.44457.9.camel@paul> From: "Paul Khavkine" To: "Charles Swiger" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Abort signal X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:27:42 -0000 --=-wLBftG5gl9Sa76rQYypg Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Here's what happends when i run it inside gdb: Program crashes and crashes gdb with it: pam_pass: using pamauth string for pam.conf lookup gdb in realloc(): error: pointer to wrong page Abort trap (core dumped) # Back trace doesn't seem to give any clues: # gdb -core gdb.core GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i386-marcel-freebsd". Core was generated by `gdb'. Program terminated with signal 6, Aborted. #0 0x2832837b in ?? () (gdb) file /usr/bin/gdb Reading symbols from /usr/bin/gdb...(no debugging symbols found)...done. (gdb) bt #0 0x2832837b in ?? () #1 0x2831d422 in ?? () #2 0x000002b6 in ?? () #3 0x00000006 in ?? () #4 0x00000000 in ?? () #5 0x00000000 in ?? () #6 0x00000286 in ?? () #7 0x283a0b0c in ?? () #8 0xbfbfe1d8 in ?? () #9 0x2838fc1b in ?? () #10 0x00000006 in ?? () #11 0xbfbfe1a8 in ?? () #12 0x00000000 in ?? () #13 0x2838fbe6 in ?? () #14 0x00000001 in ?? () #15 0x28247500 in ?? () #16 0xffffffdf in ?? () #17 0xffffffff in ?? () #18 0xffffffff in ?? () #19 0xffffffff in ?? () #20 0x28224a09 in ?? () #21 0x28247500 in ?? () #22 0x000009c8 in ?? () ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- #23 0x00000016 in ?? () #24 0x283960e5 in ?? () #25 0x283a0b0c in ?? () #26 0x283960e5 in ?? () #27 0x283bebbc in ?? () #28 0xbfbfe1f8 in ?? () #29 0x283335b9 in ?? () #30 0xbfbfed84 in ?? () #31 0x28396153 in ?? () #32 0x2839b2fb in ?? () #33 0x283960e5 in ?? () #34 0x00000638 in ?? () #35 0x283a0b0c in ?? () #36 0xbfbfe218 in ?? () #37 0x283335fd in ?? () #38 0x283960e5 in ?? () #39 0x28247500 in ?? () #40 0x283284f4 in ?? () #41 0x283335e7 in ?? () #42 0x283a0b0c in ?? () #43 0x08925000 in ?? () #44 0xbfbfe248 in ?? () #45 0x28334090 in ?? () ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- #46 0x283960e5 in ?? () #47 0x081b9023 in default_frame_base () #48 0xbfbfe248 in ?? () #49 0x28333eae in ?? () #50 0x0822a728 in sevenbit_strings () #51 0x00000000 in ?? () #52 0x00000000 in ?? () #53 0x283a0b0c in ?? () #54 0x08925000 in ?? () #55 0x0000030c in ?? () #56 0xbfbfe298 in ?? () #57 0x28334780 in ?? () #58 0x08925000 in ?? () #59 0x00004ad0 in ?? () #60 0x08338c18 in ?? () #61 0x283345e6 in ?? () #62 0x00000000 in ?? () #63 0x08338800 in ?? () #64 0x088d2820 in ?? () #65 0x00000000 in ?? () #66 0x0890c008 in ?? () #67 0x00000000 in ?? () #68 0xbfbfe298 in ?? () ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- #69 0x080b92e7 in restore_cleanups () Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?) (gdb) On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 15:22 -0500, Charles Swiger wrote: > On Jan 9, 2006, at 2:52 PM, Paul Khavkine wrote: > > When i do that it crashes also but produces gdb.core > > The backtrace form that doesn't tell me anything about where it > > happends. >=20 > If gdb itself crashes, I would suspect you've got hardware problems =20 > like bad memory. Try running memtest86.org's RAM tester overnight =20 > and see whether it picks up anything... >=20 --=-wLBftG5gl9Sa76rQYypg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iQCVAwUAQ8PvCPkjFY05CfyYAQLHjAQAh2tQvOI3NHj6FEJTc/+InkIp94ZM+RCq OZ/lsngKhyl9+rN0U9dlYEdbv3ErXl4saCRg3pyIjgfp7oaO1HIA5Ae+S/Ga8l35 vApzQ5pjH+g66EfFuREYdVHlnT7DL3/S9cyZZLlWYJVyLtBOS0J1NdtdpSZ72bft t/ZfMS86X3E= =QtcD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-wLBftG5gl9Sa76rQYypg-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 17:37:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C1D16A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:37:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jliang@so-net.net.tw) Received: from mail2000-1.so-net.net.tw (mail2000-1.so-net.net.tw [61.64.127.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 10B2343D58 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:37:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jliang@so-net.net.tw) X-M2KID: 43C3F092.0004D4E2 Received: from 61.62.69.212 by mail2000-1.so-net.net.tw with Mail2000 ESMTP Server V3.20S(26325:6:AUTH_RELAY) (envelope-from ); Wed, 11 Jan 2006 01:37:13 +0800 (CST) Message-ID: <000a01c6160c$5c2b5480$2e02a8c0@josematrix> From: "Jose Liang" To: "Giorgos Keramidas" References: <000601c61351$930ab8f0$2e02a8c0@josematrix> <003401c6133e$427b8850$2e02a8c0@josematrix> <20060107045755.GA4344@flame.pc> <000f01c61350$e706c5d0$2e02a8c0@josematrix> <20060107173741.GB1053@flame.pc> <005601c613b7$993d1d60$2e02a8c0@josematrix> <20060107212659.GA2175@flame.pc> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 01:36:16 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with cvs commit failed in cvs-freebsd setup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:37:26 -0000 Thanks for your patience and explaining first! I've created a group file inside the chroot directory, it looks just like: wheel:*:0:root,cvs nobody:*:65534: cvs:*:1002:jose but it is still unable to work. And I exec ./commitcheck in local directory, it complains: Can't locate CVSROOT/cfg.pm in @INC (@INC contains: :pserver:jose@localhost:/cvsroot /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.7/BSDPAN /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/mach /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.7/mach /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.7 .) at ./commitcheck line 13. BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at ./commitcheck line 13. So should I creat above files to the chroot environment manually? Because I'm afraid of I don't know exactly how to dig a bit deeper into Perl stuff. :( Maybe I should quit, but I just wanna use the feature of expanding a tag(cvs keyword) like 'FreeBSD'. When I modify CVSROOT/config to add my setting of KeywordExpand, cvs always failed. How could I get a solution to solve this? Thanks a lot! ----- Original Message ----- From: "Giorgos Keramidas" To: "Jose Liang" Cc: Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2006 5:26 AM Subject: Re: Problem with cvs commit failed in cvs-freebsd setup > > Try creating a minimal /etc/group file inside the chroot environment, > and see if this fixes the problem. If not, you may have to dig a bit > deeper into Perl stuff and add debugging code around the execution of > CVSROOT/commitcheck, i.e. by modifying CVSROOT/commitinfo to call a > script of your own, which prints more information about the process that > tries to invoke CVSROOT/commitcheck. > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 17:43:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E1816A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:43:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from aiolos.otenet.gr (aiolos.otenet.gr [195.170.0.93]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95C9A43D72 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:43:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) by aiolos.otenet.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-8) with SMTP id k0AHhR26025533; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:43:31 +0200 Received: by flame.pc (Postfix, from userid 1001) id F28F3115DF; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:41:57 +0200 (EET) Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:41:57 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Jose Liang Message-ID: <20060110174157.GA5001@flame.pc> References: <000601c61351$930ab8f0$2e02a8c0@josematrix> <003401c6133e$427b8850$2e02a8c0@josematrix> <20060107045755.GA4344@flame.pc> <000f01c61350$e706c5d0$2e02a8c0@josematrix> <20060107173741.GB1053@flame.pc> <005601c613b7$993d1d60$2e02a8c0@josematrix> <20060107212659.GA2175@flame.pc> <000a01c6160c$5c2b5480$2e02a8c0@josematrix> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <000a01c6160c$5c2b5480$2e02a8c0@josematrix> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with cvs commit failed in cvs-freebsd setup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:43:42 -0000 On 2006-01-11 01:36, Jose Liang wrote: > Thanks for your patience and explaining first! > > I've created a group file inside the chroot directory, it looks just like: > > wheel:*:0:root,cvs > nobody:*:65534: > cvs:*:1002:jose > > but it is still unable to work. > And I exec ./commitcheck in local directory, > it complains: > > Can't locate CVSROOT/cfg.pm in @INC (@INC contains: > :pserver:jose@localhost:/cvsroot /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.7/BSDPAN > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/mach > /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl > /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.7/mach /usr/local/lib/perl5/5.8.7 .) at > ./commitcheck line 13. > BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at ./commitcheck line 13. Where is commitcheck? Does that directory contain CFG.pm? > So should I creat above files to the chroot environment manually? They should be a part of your CVSROOT/ directory already. > Because I'm afraid of I don't know exactly how to dig a bit deeper > into Perl stuff. :( Have you followed the instructions of the article to set up all the CVSROOT/ files correctly? I refer to: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/cvs-freebsd/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 18:06:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F11816A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:06:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABB5B43D45 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:06:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id l1so4280905nzf for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:06:23 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=B749Ri3VEQ6JfQjJIjLByQ99/Xoa3kf8ev8kl2MoqHXgg8Oi/95KYvx7LkDoI5pn2xcuCPbj08nPQIerK2NQdtBZ7yOTFGLpD8A6X+TV7xUBsPBNI3stEk9sW39CBPlIEpdqOC1+nWlpWYTwk0aOOU9/dIVDrhFKlUXER6vWxo8= Received: by 10.37.15.68 with SMTP id s68mr857748nzi; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:06:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.20.67 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:06:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:06:23 +0300 From: "Andrew P." To: "Marc G. Fournier" In-Reply-To: <20060110125050.A48499@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060110125050.A48499@ganymede.hub.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dual Core vs HyperThreading vs Dual CPU X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:06:25 -0000 On 1/10/06, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > I'm going to assume that Dual Core is better (can't believe that they too= k > a step back) ... but, is how does it rate? I know that HyperThreading is > definitely !=3D Dual CPU ... but how close does Dual Core get? There is extensive evidence (google for that, please), that HT is even slower than a single core in quite a few applications. Moreover, the whole HT implementation has been shown to be a security risk. In the near future intel is going to spend $1.9bn on its new marketing campaign. If you wanna be part of it, buy their CPU, half of the money will be in your nearest billboard. Dual-core is a new, and a very smart concept, which is exactly equal to a dual-cpu configuration in terms of performance per core - plus it provides a huge cut down on power consumption, and a theoretically hugely faster interconnection between the cores (they are physically many times closer). By 2010 we'll see 4-core, 8-core and maybe even 16/32 solutions. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 19:12:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A068216A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:12:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gollum123@free.fr) Received: from smtp5-g19.free.fr (smtp5-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D4CA43D45 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:12:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gollum123@free.fr) Received: from [192.168.0.140] (tui75-2-82-229-178-102.fbx.proxad.net [82.229.178.102]) by smtp5-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D583175F4 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:12:52 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:12:51 +0100 From: Mathieu CHATEAU X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.62.12) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <668593540.20060110201251@free.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: fstab - mount_nfs - -L parameter X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mathieu CHATEAU List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:12:53 -0000 Hello all, I need to mount an nfs volume with the "-L" params. It works great by hand : mount_nfs -L server:/share but fstab refuses the -L params... how to get it work ? Thanks ! Mathieu CHATEAU From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 19:44:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9D6416A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:44:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lmccourry@charter.net) Received: from mxsf30.cluster1.charter.net (mxsf30.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3742B43D46 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:44:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lmccourry@charter.net) Received: from mxip14a.cluster1.charter.net (mxip14a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.144]) by mxsf30.cluster1.charter.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k0AJiYDi022573 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:44:34 -0500 Received: from 24-197-117-006.dhcp.spbg.sc.charter.com (HELO [192.168.1.101]) (24.197.117.6) by mxip14a.cluster1.charter.net with ESMTP; 10 Jan 2006 14:44:35 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: i="3.99,351,1131339600"; d="scan'208"; a="1180855717:sNHT50961578" Message-ID: <43C40EA1.2020500@charter.net> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:44:33 -0500 From: Larry User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: runtime error (libm.so.3) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:44:37 -0000 6.0-STABLE FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE #0: Sat Dec 31 03:17:27 EST 2005...i386 When I try to run a certain program that I can compile and link without any warnings or errors I get the following error message: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libm.so.3" not found, required by "libGL.so.1" All of my ports are up-to-date. How can I get rid of this error? I'm compiling and linking separately like this: g++ -I/usr/X11R6/include -c `wx-config --cxxflags` winmain.cpp g++ -o winmain winmain.o /usr/local/lib/compat/libm.so.3 `wx-config --libs gl,media,std,core,base` thanks, Bob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 19:50:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C5F416A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:50:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0867243D45 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:50:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0AJoYpj014474; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:50:34 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k0AJoXoZ014471; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:50:34 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:50:33 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: "Marc G. Fournier" In-Reply-To: <20060110125050.A48499@ganymede.hub.org> Message-ID: <20060110204341.U13783@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <20060110125050.A48499@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dual Core vs HyperThreading vs Dual CPU X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:50:57 -0000 > I'm going to assume that Dual Core is better (can't believe that they took a > step back) ... but, is how does it rate? I know that HyperThreading is > definitely != Dual CPU ... but how close does Dual Core get? > Dual Core = two physical CPUs, possibly sharing L2 cache. HyperThreading = double sets of registers, machine states etc... for single CPU making it look like 2 CPUs. when one "CPU" has to wait for say memory access, it then executes program from other thread. it means it can be faster than single CPU, but of course much slower than 2 CPUs. because this strategy make cache data shared and often switched between two different threads, it can result slower performance. the net effect is positive in Intel's tests, but very little positive-to little negative in practice like FreeBSD servers. Many users end in running single-CPU kernel because it actually works faster. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 19:52:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8968416A41F; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:52:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80B7043D46; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:52:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0AJqGei014585; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:52:16 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k0AJqGcs014582; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:52:16 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:52:16 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: Mark Ovens In-Reply-To: <43C3D627.4040808@freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20060110205040.L13783@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <43C3D627.4040808@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Virtual CD drive for FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:52:22 -0000 > Is there such a thing as a virtual CD drive in the Ports. Something that well it has virtual CD, virtual DVD, virtual floppy, virtual disk and virtual any-block-device man mdconfig :) in base FreeBSD distribution. mdconfig -a -t vnode -o readonly -f file will show device name like md0 and /dev/md0 is your "virtual CD" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 20:05:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D65DF16A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:05:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E73543D58 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:05:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id l1so4307346nzf for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:05:18 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=OpxeS7Hbi9phBkQlus6auEub5Pq6p+48bs1jRDBvdCf70odFFLskC3R5ctbqqZ87uG/w27w8/6ogtvoE/rVOrLNrwesef/JV98cBMsmre9LwsCLKxShKUFAbPnzMz4ie+XOkcOrXXgqFct98rN5HZ74F4bVD8j7ArZNoIVZi8jA= Received: by 10.36.80.2 with SMTP id d2mr3815041nzb; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:05:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.20.67 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:05:16 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:05:16 +0300 From: "Andrew P." To: User Gandalf In-Reply-To: <43C3E12C.3080001@messias.qhigh.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <43C3E12C.3080001@messias.qhigh.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Native voip software for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:05:20 -0000 On 1/10/06, User Gandalf wrote: > > Hello, > > Do you know any native voip software for FreeBSD? > I hate to install Linux compatibility mode just to have skype working. > Thanks, > > Les > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > mbone/speak_freely net/kphone security/cutlass asterisk-related ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 20:07:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE25616A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:07:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jacob@6texans.net) Received: from cavalry.6texans.net (sixjs164.august.net [216.87.134.164]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA58043D46 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:07:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jacob@6texans.net) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by cavalry.6texans.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 747E356E14 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:07:00 -0600 (CST) Received: from cavalry.6texans.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (cavalry [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 11518-10 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:06:58 -0600 (CST) Received: from jacob.6texans.net (stonewall.6texans.net [216.87.134.162]) by cavalry.6texans.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FE5B56D56 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:06:58 -0600 (CST) Received: from jacob by jacob.6texans.net with local (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1EwPli-0005Vm-34 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:06:58 -0600 Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:06:58 -0600 From: Jacob S To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060110200658.GE22508@6texans.net> References: <20060106001744.6aa1367d@jacob.6texans.net> <20060106140514.GC2217@flame.pc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pY3vCvL1qV+PayAL" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060106140514.GC2217@flame.pc> X-Mailer: Mutt http://www.mutt.org/ X-Editor: Vim http://www.vim.org/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at 6texans.net Subject: Re: Ipf problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:07:06 -0000 --pY3vCvL1qV+PayAL Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 04:05:14PM +0200, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2006-01-06 00:17, Jacob S wrote: > > Hello list, > > > > I'm having a problem setting up ipf on a FreeBSD server and can't > > figure out where I'm going wrong. I copied my ipf.rules file from > > another server I have where ipf is working great. But after I > > customized the rules to this server it is filling /var/log/messages > > with lines like the following: > > > > Jan 4 15:15:21 pikeman ipmon[222]: 15:15:21.465822 2x em0 @0:33 b > > 198.32.64.12,53 -> 65.19.150.68,62097 PR udp len 20 > > 314 IN Jan 4 15:15:21 pikeman ipmon[222]: 15:15:21.492578 em0 @0:33 b > > 216.200.145.35,25 -> 65.19.150.68,57210 PR tcp len 20 60 -AS IN Jan 4 > > 15:15:21 pikeman ipmon[222]: 15:15:21.505821 em0 @0:33 b > > 205.188.156.249,25 -> 65.19.150.68,57209 PR tcp len 20 48 -AS IN > The blocked packets fall through the chain of rules and end up in rule > 0:33 (0 =3D incoming, 33 =3D block in log first quick on em0 all). >=20 > > The lines scroll by faster than I can read them, if I tail the logfile. > > The blocked packets in this case are coming from standard ports to > > non-standard ports. Doing a reverse lookup on the ips, it would seem > > that my server has initiated the transfer and the other servers are > > simply replying. (I deduce that from the blocked ips because they belong > > to hostnames that I would not expect to be flooding my server. Namely, > > the first ip is for l.root-servers.net.) >=20 > This seems to be an issue with the timeout of rule states. What do you > see if you run... >=20 > $ sysctl -a | fgrep ipf. >=20 > it should be something like: >=20 > net.inet.ipf.fr_minttl: 4 > net.inet.ipf.fr_chksrc: 0 > net.inet.ipf.fr_defaultauthage: 600 > net.inet.ipf.fr_authused: 0 > net.inet.ipf.fr_authsize: 32 > net.inet.ipf.ipf_hostmap_sz: 2047 > net.inet.ipf.ipf_rdrrules_sz: 127 > net.inet.ipf.ipf_natrules_sz: 127 > net.inet.ipf.ipf_nattable_sz: 2047 > net.inet.ipf.fr_statemax: 4013 > net.inet.ipf.fr_statesize: 5737 > net.inet.ipf.fr_running: 1 > net.inet.ipf.fr_ipfrttl: 120 > net.inet.ipf.fr_defnatage: 1200 > net.inet.ipf.fr_icmptimeout: 120 > net.inet.ipf.fr_udpacktimeout: 24 > net.inet.ipf.fr_udptimeout: 240 > net.inet.ipf.fr_tcpclosed: 120 > net.inet.ipf.fr_tcptimeout: 480 > net.inet.ipf.fr_tcplastack: 480 > net.inet.ipf.fr_tcpclosewait: 480 > net.inet.ipf.fr_tcphalfclosed: 14400 > net.inet.ipf.fr_tcpidletimeout: 864000 > net.inet.ipf.fr_active: 0 > net.inet.ipf.fr_pass: 134217730 > net.inet.ipf.fr_flags: 0 sysctl -a | fgrep ipf shows this on the problem server: net.inet.ipf.fr_flags: 0 net.inet.ipf.fr_pass: 514 net.inet.ipf.fr_active: 0 net.inet.ipf.fr_tcpidletimeout: 864000 net.inet.ipf.fr_tcpclosewait: 480 net.inet.ipf.fr_tcplastack: 480 net.inet.ipf.fr_tcptimeout: 480 net.inet.ipf.fr_tcpclosed: 120 net.inet.ipf.fr_tcphalfclosed: 14400 net.inet.ipf.fr_udptimeout: 240 net.inet.ipf.fr_udpacktimeout: 24 net.inet.ipf.fr_icmptimeout: 120 net.inet.ipf.fr_icmpacktimeout: 12 net.inet.ipf.fr_defnatage: 1200 net.inet.ipf.fr_ipfrttl: 120 net.inet.ipf.ipl_unreach: 13 net.inet.ipf.fr_running: 1 net.inet.ipf.fr_authsize: 32 net.inet.ipf.fr_authused: 0 net.inet.ipf.fr_defaultauthage: 600 net.inet.ipf.fr_chksrc: 0 net.inet.ipf.ippr_ftp_pasvonly: 0 net.inet.ipf.fr_minttl: 3 net.inet.ipf.fr_minttllog: 1 net.link.ether.ipfw: 0 Incidentally, the server I copied my ipf.rules file from has an identical output from sysctl -a | fgrep ipf. Any more thoughts or tips? Thanks, Jacob --=20 GnuPG Key: 1024D/16377135 Random .signature #19: Computers are like air conditioners -- they stop working properly if you open Windows --pY3vCvL1qV+PayAL Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFDxBPikpJ43hY3cTURAotSAJ9PUBUo83LQJya6dJXyerPy3I6rGACg0xr/ g/02zaXbrMCa1tVapNoxg5E= =QmNF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pY3vCvL1qV+PayAL-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 20:19:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1BF116A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:19:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00F5043D45 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:19:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id l1so4310224nzf for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:19:52 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=uGxJ88SnaRO4HmSZdXjVzgXcOf99+XGgZXPB+B5mX6ObzeJ0PpwENoVUN2NntIRlc2kUqDMP7J0MI6yav3n6VSycGeV2uUT2gVA6/7aZqq4BKMbVtZt/UwA9luNbrfVMk9uWAeFkV5Q937hMLWCZf1XePBvNPs8kuNYRVqdYaX8= Received: by 10.36.141.5 with SMTP id o5mr1041621nzd; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:19:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.20.67 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:19:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:19:52 +0300 From: "Andrew P." To: Mathieu CHATEAU In-Reply-To: <668593540.20060110201251@free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <668593540.20060110201251@free.fr> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fstab - mount_nfs - -L parameter X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:19:53 -0000 On 1/10/06, Mathieu CHATEAU wrote: > Hello all, > > I need to mount an nfs volume with the "-L" params. > > It works great by hand : > mount_nfs -L server:/share > > but fstab refuses the -L params... really? What does it say? Do you have "ro" or "rw" present in the options? Here's my line that works: lan-217:/mnt/200a /mnt/200a nfs -L,ro 0 0 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 20:50:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C48116A41F; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:50:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@skyhawk.ca) Received: from priv-edtnes51.telusplanet.net (outbound04.telus.net [199.185.220.223]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8FE643D46; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:50:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@skyhawk.ca) Received: from internal.zenathletics.com ([216.232.62.60]) by priv-edtnes51.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.04 201-2131-123-105-20051025) with ESMTP id <20060110205012.VKFT10129.priv-edtnes51.telusplanet.net@internal.zenathletics.com>; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:50:12 -0700 Received: from [192.168.2.108] (helo=[192.168.2.108]) by internal.zenathletics.com with esmtp (Exim 4.52 (FreeBSD)) id 1EwQUZ-000H1r-PQ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:53:19 -0800 Message-ID: <43C41DF1.3070305@skyhawk.ca> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 12:49:53 -0800 From: Andrew Fremantle User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dennis Olvany References: <43C3896A.7090704@skyhawk.ca> <43C3E684.5040204@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <43C3E684.5040204@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Advanced IPFW2 Forward rule problem / bug / misunderstanding X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:50:16 -0000 Dennis Olvany wrote: >This should get you most of the way there or at least give you a good >idea of what's required. > > > > >>options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD_EXTENDED >> >> > >I'm pretty sure this will be required. > > > > >>defaultrouter="24.85.92.1" >>ifconfig_rl0="192.168.1.1" >>ifconfig_vr0="142.179.109.xxx netmask 255.255.248.0" >>ifconfig_vr1="216.232.85.xxx netmask 255.255.254.0" >>ifconfig_rue0="24.85.9x.xxx netmask 255.255.252.0" >>ifconfig_rue0_alias0="24.85.9x.xxx netmask 255.255.255.255" >> >> > > > > >>Telus >>ext1_ip="142.179.109.xxx" # IP Address >>ext1_gw="142.179.104.254" # IP Gateway >>ext2_ip="216.232.85.xxx" # IP Address >>ext2_gw="216.232.84.254" # IP Gateway >> >> > > > >>Shaw Cable >>shaw_ip="24.85.93.xxx" # IP Address >>shaw_gw="24.85.92.1" # IP Gateway >>srv2_ext="24.85.93.xxx" # External IP of server >> >> > > > >>INTERNAL >>int_ip="192.168.1.1" # IP Address >> >> > > > > >># And run our new NATd >>/sbin/natd -log_ipfw_denied -i ${nat_in} -o ${nat_out} -s -m -u -n >>${shaw} -punch_fw 36000:100 -redirect_port tcp ${ext1_srv}:22 >>${ext1_ip}:xxxx -redirect_port tcp ${ext1_srv}:53 ${ext1_ip}:53 >>-redirect_port tcp ${ext1_srv}:80 ${ext1_ip}:80 -redirect_port tcp >>${ext1_srv}:443 ${ext1_ip}:443 -redirect_port udp ${ext1_srv}:53 >>${ext1_ip}:53 -redirect_port tcp ${ext2_srv}:80 ${ext2_ip}:80 >>-redirect_port tcp ${ext2_srv}:443 ${ext2_ip}:443 -redirect_port tcp >>${srv1_int}:22 ${shaw_ip}:xxxx -redirect_port tcp ${srv1_int}:53 >>${shaw_ip}:53 -redirect_port udp ${srv1_int}:53 ${shaw_ip}:53 >>-redirect_port tcp ${srv1_int}:80 ${shaw_ip}:80 -redirect_port tcp >>${srv1_int}:443 ${shaw_ip}:443 -redirect_port tcp ${srv2_int}:80 >>${srv2_ext}:80 -redirect_port tcp ${srv2_int}:443 ${srv2_ext}:443 >> >> > >That's a hefty nat command. Let's simplfy by putting it in a file. I >leave the port forwarding to you. > >/etc/rc.conf > >natd_enable="yes" >natd_flags="-f /etc/natd.conf" > >/etc/natd.conf > >instance default >interface vr0 >port 8668 > >instance telus2 >interface vr1 >port 8669 > >instance shaw1 >alias_address 24.85.93.xxx >port 8670 > >instance shaw2 >alias_address 24.85.93.xxx >port 8671 > >globalport 8672 > > >I see that your firewall is based on rc.firewall. Forget rc.firewall, it >is junk. Base your firewall on this structure. > >1. Public Interface NAT Diversion > >2. check-state > >3. Public Interface Leak Prevention > 3.1 deny egress from internal hosts > 3.2 deny ingress to internal hosts > >4. Antispoof > 4.1 allow via loopback interface > 4.2 deny ingress from router > 4.3 deny ingress from internal hosts via public interface > >5. Router > 5.1 allow egress > 5.2 deny egress > 5.3 allow ingress > 5.4 deny ingress > >6. Internal Hosts > 6.1 allow egress > 6.2 deny egress > 6.3 allow ingress > 6.4 deny ingress > >7. Default Deny > > >/etc/rc.conf > >firewall_enable="yes" >firewall_type="/etc/ipfw.rules" > >/etc/ipfw.rules > >-f flush > >add divert 8668 ip from any to any in via vr0 >add divert 8669 ip from any to any in via vr1 >add divert 8670 ip from any to 24.85.93.xxx in via rue0 >add divert 8671 ip from any to 24.85.93.xxx in via rue0 >#have never known the globalport to work on inbound >add divert 8672 ip from any to any out via { vr0 or vr1 or rue0 } >#not sure if that 'or' will work... may need to split it up > >check-state > >add deny ip from 192.168.1.1/24 to any via { vr0 or vr1 or rue0 } > >add allow ip from me to me via lo0 keep-state >add deny ip from me to any in > >add allow ip from me to { me or 192.168.1.1/24 or 142.179.109.xxx/21 or >216.232.85.xxx/23 or 24.85.9x.xxx/22 } keep-state >add forward 142.179.104.254 ip from 142.179.109.xxx to any keep-state >add forward 216.232.84.254 ip from 216.232.85.xxx to any keep-state >add forward 24.85.92.1 ip from 24.85.9x.xxx to any keep-state >add forward 24.85.92.1 ip from 24.85.9x.xxx to any keep-state >add allow ip from me to any keep-state >add deny ip from me to any >add allow icmp from any to me icmptypes 3,4,8,11 keep-state >add deny ip from any to me > >add allow ip from 192.168.1.1/24 to any keep-state >add deny ip from 192.168.1.1/24 to any >add allow icmp from any to 192.168.1.1/24 icmptypes 3,4,11 keep-state >add deny ip from any to 192.168.1.1/24 > > Thank for the quick reply. I just want to clarify a few things here.... Given that I only want outbound NAT on one interface, is it really necessary to run four instances of NATd? Can't one instance handle outbound NAT + inbound sessions on all interfaces, as I have it setup? Also, you're using a whole bunch of options and features here that are not documented on the natd man page. I found a writeup by the author of these features, but I'm not certain if that's in the -STABLE branch or not. (IE, will these options work with a 6.0-RELEASE natd?) Also, I'm not certain how your forward rules would work when mine do not, as you're doing the same thing I did - NAT Translation, then forward to the appropriate gateway. My experience is that forwarding packets to the appropriate gateway *does* *not* *work*, as they all leave via the default route's interface anyways. I see your ipfw rules keeping state on NATd sessions, which I have learned is not a good idea. Isn't it far better to let NATd handle state on all NATd traffic, and just use ipfw to keep-state on locally-generated sessions? Still, a quick glance doesen't show me any reasons why your rules *wouldn't* work, ( At least, no more reasons than my own rules don't work) and it is drastically more compact than my own (Though I have an easier time visualizing packet flow with my layout). I might give these a shot in a couple of days (I don't have physical access to the machine right now). - Andrew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 21:00:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C411F16A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:00:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54DA343D46 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:00:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1EwQbT-0000BM-KW for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:00:27 +0100 Received: from port-212-202-34-162.dynamic.qsc.de ([212.202.34.162]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:00:27 +0100 Received: from markus by port-212-202-34-162.dynamic.qsc.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:00:27 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Markus Trippelsdorf Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:00:01 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 15 Message-ID: <1T2r3s0eI12ipNv9%markus@bsd.trippelsdorf.de> References: <43C40EA1.2020500@charter.net> X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: port-212-202-34-162.dynamic.qsc.de Sender: news Subject: Re: runtime error (libm.so.3) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:00:48 -0000 On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:44:33 -0500, Larry wrote: > > 6.0-STABLE FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE #0: Sat Dec 31 03:17:27 EST 2005...i386 > > When I try to run a certain program that I can compile and link without any > warnings or errors I get the following error message: > > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libm.so.3" not found, required by > "libGL.so.1" > It looks like your X Server was build and linked under 5.x. Rebuilding xorg should help... -- Markus From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 21:01:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D633316A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:01:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alan.curtis@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D74E43D5A for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:01:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from alan.curtis@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s1so3932883nze for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:01:55 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=loJI9dKyyOYfzmWy90801BPc5c1RqkoN7yWRu8A+BBbPxHAKpkrB+h2nGhFK+5obwu4eSmiy9vh+rWZ7h4033eYMN25LrrMISRi9jVrzfvp53nwqmJX4hj4RyGNpqI4Iv5o7kjwCp/ScRihZzoUxVpi20NgMX/5RIBaZnbxT/zs= Received: by 10.65.52.3 with SMTP id e3mr3306878qbk; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:01:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.237.6 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:01:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <19a274650601101301v3e842d92pde7fbd0e5828f018@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:01:54 -0500 From: Alan Curtis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: installing dovecot: no dovecot-openssl.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:01:59 -0000 I have installed /usr/ports/dovecot. When I try to start it, using '/usr/local/etc/rc.d dovecot start' it compla= ins "Error: Can't use SSL certificate /etc/ssl/certs/dovecot.pem: No such file or directory" Reading '/usr/local/share/doc/dovecot/configuration.txt' says "If you need to create new SSL certificate, edit dovecot-openssl.cnf and run mkcert.sh." but I cannot find a file 'dovecot-openssl.cnf' or 'mkcert.sh' and have no 'etc/ssl/certs/' (or /usr/share/ssl or /usr/local/share/ssl) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 21:21:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCC7616A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:21:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22B7F43D48 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:21:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0ALLDNu020661 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:21:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k0ALLDX8020658 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:21:13 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:21:12 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060110221936.A20557@chylonia.3miasto.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: FreeBSD & time travel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:21:23 -0000 while running my FreeBSD/amd64 server a couple of days it once change it's time to midnight 1 january 2000. of course lots of services failed to work undil i did rdate can it be hardware or software bug? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 21:27:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 606D216A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:27:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@ferrarishields.com) Received: from mail.ferrarishields.com (mail.ferrarishields.com [216.82.146.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CB8543D46 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:27:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@ferrarishields.com) Received: from dan (dan [10.70.153.5]) by mail.ferrarishields.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 284447301A; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:27:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <012901c6162c$b7b54480$0599460a@dan> From: "Dan O'Connor" To: "JK" , References: Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:27:54 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="UTF-8"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Cc: Subject: Re: 6.0 on Apple's Intel Developer Platform? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:27:37 -0000 >I can get the 6.0 CD1 to boot ok on Apple's Intel Developers Platform >but the usb keyboard is not recognized. Do I have to do something >special to use a USB keyboard? There is no PS/2 keyboard or mouse port >on that platform. Did you try "7. Boot FreeBSD with a USB keyboard" at the boot menu? ~Dan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 21:53:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8927116A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:53:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhall@vandaliamo.net) Received: from trueband.net (director.trueband.net [216.163.120.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D4EAE43D48 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:53:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhall@vandaliamo.net) Received: (qmail 4199 invoked by uid 1006); 10 Jan 2006 21:53:46 -0000 Received: from jhall@vandaliamo.net by rs0 by uid 1003 with qmail-scanner-1.16 (spamassassin: 2.64. Clear:SA:0(-0.8/100.0):. Processed in 14.070039 secs); 10 Jan 2006 21:53:46 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=100.0 X-Spam-Level: Received: from unknown (HELO trueband.net) (172.16.0.6) by -v with SMTP; 10 Jan 2006 21:53:32 -0000 Received: (qmail 17008 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2006 21:53:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO admintool.trueband.net) (127.0.0.1) by -v with SMTP; 10 Jan 2006 21:53:31 -0000 Received: from 199.223.158.225 (SquirrelMail authenticated user jhall@vandaliamo.net) by admintool.trueband.net with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:53:31 -0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <1588.199.223.158.225.1136930011.squirrel@admintool.trueband.net> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:53:31 -0000 (GMT) From: jhall@vandaliamo.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: FreeBSD and mpd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:53:51 -0000 Recently, I upgraded from FreeBSD 4.8 to FreeBSD 6.0. And, I upgraded mpd from version 3.17 to 3.18. After the upgrade, several sites began experiencing problems maintaining their connections (especially under high traffic loads). When I put the 4.8 server back in place, everything began working normally again. This is really perplexing to me since I use FreeBSD 6 and mpd in several locations without any problems. The server is a Celeron processor with 128 MB of RAM, and two em interfaces. I have also added ipf support to the kernel. I am not seeing any errors in the logs concerning either interface. And, I am not seeing any error messages in the MPD log. Does anyone know of any problems with mpd 3.18 on FreeBSD? Or, can someone suggest a good testing strategy to determine where the problem lies? Thanks, Jay From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 21:59:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCC0316A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:59:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from awebster@connectalk.com) Received: from esafe.connectalk.com (esafe.connectalk.com [204.19.165.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3988D43D45 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:59:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from awebster@connectalk.com) Received: from connectalk.com ([10.125.204.14]) by eSafe SMTP Relay 1136385415; Tue Jan 10 16:56:44 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:59:39 -0500 Message-ID: <9D61D69E3C1F7F459C5513AD830EE2192BC1D9@mtlex01.connectalk.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: installing dovecot: no dovecot-openssl.conf Thread-Index: AcYWLVSj/azDMce3TZ2qLx9o950WEwAA2VUw From: "Webster, Andrew" To: "Alan Curtis" , X-ESAFE-STATUS: Mail clean X-ESAFE-DETAILS: Clean Cc: Subject: RE: installing dovecot: no dovecot-openssl.conf X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:59:42 -0000 Unless you absolutely need SSL support, edit the configuration so as not to use SSL. If you do want to use SSL, you will probably want to generate yourself a self-signed certificate, and then get a real cert from a 3rd party cert provider when you are ready to go into production. See http://www.openssl.org/docs/HOWTO/certificates.txt Place the resulting files in the expected locations, and give it a go. Andrew=20 -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Alan Curtis Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 16:02 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: installing dovecot: no dovecot-openssl.conf I have installed /usr/ports/dovecot. When I try to start it, using '/usr/local/etc/rc.d dovecot start' it complains "Error: Can't use SSL certificate /etc/ssl/certs/dovecot.pem: No such file or directory" Reading '/usr/local/share/doc/dovecot/configuration.txt' says "If you need to create new SSL certificate, edit dovecot-openssl.cnf and run mkcert.sh." but I cannot find a file 'dovecot-openssl.cnf' or 'mkcert.sh' and have no 'etc/ssl/certs/' (or /usr/share/ssl or /usr/local/share/ssl) _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" *************************************************************************= ************************* The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential. They are intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager= or the=20 sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to anyone or make cop= ies. ** eSafe scanned this email for viruses, vandals and malicious content. *= * *************************************************************************= ************************* From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 22:01:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EE5716A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:01:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@ferrarishields.com) Received: from mail.ferrarishields.com (mail.ferrarishields.com [216.82.146.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2223F43D45 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:01:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@ferrarishields.com) Received: from dan (dan [10.70.153.5]) by mail.ferrarishields.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D858D7301A; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:01:51 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <030a01c61631$811fa0a0$0599460a@dan> From: "Dan O'Connor" To: "Brian Bobowski" , "FreeBSD User Questions List" References: <43BC097C.4000401@gmail.com> <43C1F14E.3010808@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:02:10 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Cc: Subject: Re: Setting up a FreeBSD gateway (more detail) and IPFW X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:01:54 -0000 > Thanks to those who replied to my previous call for help. Now I think > it's time I actually provide some relevant detail. > Ideally, I'd like to be able to leave my workstation's network > settings alone, and set up DHCP; however, a look over the ports > suggests that's far more trouble than it's worth for a single client > that doesn't really need such flexibility. > > I don't have any servers running on my workstation, so I've no need to > allow traffic from the 'net to get through the firewall to the > LAN(servers on the gateway itself are another matter). However, the > firewall is still my biggest challenge. A DHCP server *looks* challenging to set up...but it's really a snap! See my example at http://www.mostgraveconcern.com/freebsd/sheet.cgi?dhcp Also, check out my firewall setup: http://www.mostgraveconcern.com/freebsd/sheet.cgi?ipfw I don't use named, I just allow outbound DNS lookups through the firewall. Also, my DHCP server points clients at my ISP's DNS servers... Hope this helps, ~Dan -- FreeBSD Cheat Sheets http://www.mostgraveconcern.com/freebsd/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 22:05:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1610816A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:05:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from sccrmhc14.comcast.net (sccrmhc14.comcast.net [204.127.202.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AC2443D46 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:04:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-24-118-173-219.hsd1.mn.comcast.net[24.118.173.219]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc14) with ESMTP id <2006011022045601400sgsaoe>; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:04:56 +0000 From: Josh Paetzel To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:04:55 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; boundary="Boundary-00=_H+CxDkImstsDUSa" Message-Id: <200601101604.55833.josh@tcbug.org> Cc: Subject: Slow 2d performance in X / opera / nvidia drivers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:05:02 -0000 --Boundary-00=_H+CxDkImstsDUSa Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline gimpy# uname -a FreeBSD gimpy.tcbug.org 5.4-RELEASE-p8 FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p8 #9: Fri Jan 6 20:26:44 CST 2006 jpaetzel@gimpy.tcbug.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GIMPY i386 dmesg attached Xorg config attached Kernel config attached I've been having terrible 2d performance with opera (linux-opera and native 8.51 and 9.0) using the nvidia drivers. When I windowshade it and then restore it there is a sizeable delay while it redraws the window. If I rapidly shade and restore the window my idle CPU time goes to 0% and mp3 playback will occassionally skip. The problem first started when Opera 8 was released, I hoped that further releases would address it but so far that has not been the case. Any suggestions for a fix welcome. (Yes, I have been seeking support on opera.com but this feels like a FreeBSD mis-configuration of some sort on my end. :) -- Thanks, Josh Paetzel --Boundary-00=_H+CxDkImstsDUSa Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; name="dmesg.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="dmesg.txt" Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p8 #9: Fri Jan 6 20:26:44 CST 2006 jpaetzel@gimpy.tcbug.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GIMPY ACPI APIC Table: Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: AMD Athlon(tm) 64 Processor 3500+ (2202.84-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "AuthenticAMD" Id = 0x20ff2 Stepping = 2 Features=0x78bfbff AMD Features=0xe0500000 real memory = 1073414144 (1023 MB) avail memory = 1036673024 (988 MB) MADT: Forcing active-low polarity and level trigger for SCI ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter "ACPI-safe" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x808-0x80b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 nvidia0: mem 0xfa000000-0xfaffffff,0xe0000000-0xefffffff,0xfb000000-0xfbffffff irq 16 at device 0.0 on pci1 pcm0: port 0xa400-0xa41f irq 16 at device 9.0 on pci0 pcm0: pci0: at device 10.0 (no driver attached) xl0: <3Com 3c905-TX Fast Etherlink XL> port 0xb400-0xb43f irq 19 at device 14.0 on pci0 miibus0: on xl0 nsphy0: on miibus0 nsphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto xl0: Ethernet address: 00:60:97:d8:ad:bd atapci0: port 0xb800-0xb8ff,0xc000-0xc00f,0xc400-0xc403,0xc800-0xc807,0xd000-0xd003,0xd400-0xd407 irq 20 at device 15.0 on pci0 ata2: channel #0 on atapci0 ata3: channel #1 on atapci0 atapci1: port 0xfc00-0xfc0f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 15.1 on pci0 ata0: channel #0 on atapci1 ata1: channel #1 on atapci1 uhci0: port 0xd800-0xd81f irq 21 at device 16.0 on pci0 usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: port 0xe000-0xe01f irq 21 at device 16.1 on pci0 usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci2: port 0xe400-0xe41f irq 21 at device 16.2 on pci0 usb2: on uhci2 usb2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci3: port 0xe800-0xe81f irq 21 at device 16.3 on pci0 usb3: on uhci3 usb3: USB revision 1.0 uhub3: VIA UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub3: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered ehci0: mem 0xf9e00000-0xf9e000ff irq 21 at device 16.4 on pci0 usb4: waiting for BIOS to give up control usb4: timed out waiting for BIOS usb4: EHCI version 1.0 usb4: companion controllers, 2 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2 usb3 usb4: on ehci0 usb4: USB revision 2.0 uhub4: VIA EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub4: 8 ports with 8 removable, self powered umass0: Jabil Circuit Seagate External Drive, rev 2.00/2.40, addr 2 isab0: at device 17.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 acpi_button0: on acpi0 acpi_button1: on acpi0 atkbdc0: port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 fdc0: port 0x3f7,0x3f0-0x3f5 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 ppc0: port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on acpi0 ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode ppbus0: on ppc0 plip0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio0: port may not be enabled sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A pmtimer0 on isa0 orm0: at iomem 0xcf000-0xd2fff,0xc0000-0xcefff on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 ums0: Logitech USB-PS/2 Optical Mouse, rev 2.00/13.20, addr 2, iclass 3/1 ums0: 4 buttons and Z dir. ugen0: Logitech Camera, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 2 Timecounter "TSC" frequency 2202838273 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec ad0: 114473MB [232581/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 ad1: 190782MB [387621/16/63] at ata0-slave UDMA100 ata1-master: DMA limited to UDMA33, non-ATA66 cable or device acd0: DVDR at ata1-master UDMA33 ad3: 114473MB [232581/16/63] at ata1-slave UDMA100 ad4: 238475MB [484521/16/63] at ata2-master SATA150 cd0 at ata1 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device cd0: 33.000MB/s transfers cd0: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present da0 at umass-sim0 bus 0 target 0 lun 0 da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-0 device da0: 40.000MB/s transfers da0: 95396MB (195371568 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 12161C) Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s2a --Boundary-00=_H+CxDkImstsDUSa Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; name="XF86Config" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="XF86Config" Section "ServerLayout" Identifier "X.org Configured" Screen "Screen0" InputDevice "Mouse0" "CorePointer" InputDevice "Keyboard0" "CoreKeyboard" EndSection Section "Files" RgbPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/rgb" ModulePath "/usr/X11R6/lib/modules" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/misc/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Speedo/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/CID/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/" FontPath "/usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/" EndSection Section "Module" Load "extmod" Load "glx" Load "dri" Load "dbe" Load "record" Load "xtrap" Load "speedo" Load "type1" Load "freetype" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Keyboard0" Driver "keyboard" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Mouse0" Driver "mouse" Option "Protocol" "auto" Option "Device" "/dev/sysmouse" Option "ZAxisMapping" "4 5" EndSection Section "Monitor" Identifier "Monitor0" VendorName "VSC" ModelName "0" HorizSync 12 - 90.0 VertRefresh 30.0 - 120.0 EndSection Section "Device" Identifier "Card0" Driver "nvidia" VendorName "nvidia" Option "NvAGP" "1" BoardName "6600GT" Option "TwinView" Option "SecondMonitorHorizSync" "31-82" Option "SecondMonitorVertRefresh" "55-120" Option "TwinViewOrientation" "LeftOf" Option "MetaModes" "1280x1024, 1280x1024; 1280x1024, NULL" Option "ConnectedMonitor" "crt,crt" EndSection Section "Screen" Identifier "Screen0" Device "Card0" Monitor "Monitor0" DefaultColorDepth 24 SubSection "Display" Depth 24 Modes "1280x1024" EndSubSection EndSection --Boundary-00=_H+CxDkImstsDUSa Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; name="GIMPY" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="GIMPY" # # GENERIC -- Generic kernel configuration file for FreeBSD/i386 # # For more information on this file, please read the handbook section on # Kernel Configuration Files: # # http://www.FreeBSD.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/kernelconfig-config.html # # The handbook is also available locally in /usr/share/doc/handbook # if you've installed the doc distribution, otherwise always see the # FreeBSD World Wide Web server (http://www.FreeBSD.org/) for the # latest information. # # An exhaustive list of options and more detailed explanations of the # device lines is also present in the ../../conf/NOTES and NOTES files. # If you are in doubt as to the purpose or necessity of a line, check first # in NOTES. # # $FreeBSD: src/sys/i386/conf/GENERIC,v 1.413.2.13 2005/04/02 16:37:58 scottl Exp $ machine i386 cpu I686_CPU ident GIMPY # To statically compile in device wiring instead of /boot/device.hints #hints "GENERIC.hints" # Default places to look for devices. options SCHED_4BSD # 4BSD scheduler options INET # InterNETworking options INET6 # IPv6 communications protocols options FFS # Berkeley Fast Filesystem options SOFTUPDATES # Enable FFS soft updates support options UFS_ACL # Support for access control lists options UFS_DIRHASH # Improve performance on big directories options MD_ROOT # MD is a potential root device options NFSCLIENT # Network Filesystem Client options NFSSERVER # Network Filesystem Server options NFS_ROOT # NFS usable as /, requires NFSCLIENT options MSDOSFS # MSDOS Filesystem options CD9660 # ISO 9660 Filesystem options PROCFS # Process filesystem (requires PSEUDOFS) options PSEUDOFS # Pseudo-filesystem framework options GEOM_GPT # GUID Partition Tables. options COMPAT_43 # Compatible with BSD 4.3 [KEEP THIS!] options COMPAT_FREEBSD4 # Compatible with FreeBSD4 options SCSI_DELAY=15000 # Delay (in ms) before probing SCSI options KTRACE # ktrace(1) support options SYSVSHM # SYSV-style shared memory options SYSVMSG # SYSV-style message queues options SYSVSEM # SYSV-style semaphores options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING # POSIX P1003_1B real-time extensions options KBD_INSTALL_CDEV # install a CDEV entry in /dev options AHC_REG_PRETTY_PRINT # Print register bitfields in debug # output. Adds ~128k to driver. options AHD_REG_PRETTY_PRINT # Print register bitfields in debug # output. Adds ~215k to driver. options ADAPTIVE_GIANT # Giant mutex is adaptive. device apic # I/O APIC # Bus support. Do not remove isa, even if you have no isa slots device isa device pci # Floppy drives device fdc # ATA and ATAPI devices device ata device atadisk # ATA disk drives device ataraid # ATA RAID drives device atapicd # ATAPI CDROM drives options ATA_STATIC_ID # Static device numbering device atapicam # SCSI peripherals device scbus # SCSI bus (required for SCSI) device ch # SCSI media changers device da # Direct Access (disks) device sa # Sequential Access (tape etc) device cd # CD device pass # Passthrough device (direct SCSI access) device ses # SCSI Environmental Services (and SAF-TE) # atkbdc0 controls both the keyboard and the PS/2 mouse device atkbdc # AT keyboard controller device atkbd # AT keyboard device psm # PS/2 mouse device vga # VGA video card driver device splash # Splash screen and screen saver support # syscons is the default console driver, resembling an SCO console device sc # Enable this for the pcvt (VT220 compatible) console driver #device vt #options XSERVER # support for X server on a vt console #options FAT_CURSOR # start with block cursor #device agp # support several AGP chipsets # Floating point support - do not disable. device npx # Power management support (see NOTES for more options) #device apm # Add suspend/resume support for the i8254. device pmtimer # Serial (COM) ports device sio # 8250, 16[45]50 based serial ports # Parallel port device ppc device ppbus # Parallel port bus (required) device lpt # Printer device plip # TCP/IP over parallel device ppi # Parallel port interface device #device vpo # Requires scbus and da # If you've got a "dumb" serial or parallel PCI card that is # supported by the puc(4) glue driver, uncomment the following # line to enable it (connects to the sio and/or ppc drivers): #device puc # PCI Ethernet NICs that use the common MII bus controller code. # NOTE: Be sure to keep the 'device miibus' line in order to use these NICs! device miibus # MII bus support device fxp # Intel EtherExpress PRO/100B (82557, 82558) device xl # 3Com 3c90x (``Boomerang'', ``Cyclone'') # Pseudo devices. device loop # Network loopback device mem # Memory and kernel memory devices device io # I/O device device random # Entropy device device ether # Ethernet support device sl # Kernel SLIP device ppp # Kernel PPP device tun # Packet tunnel. device pty # Pseudo-ttys (telnet etc) device md # Memory "disks" device gif # IPv6 and IPv4 tunneling device faith # IPv6-to-IPv4 relaying (translation) # The `bpf' device enables the Berkeley Packet Filter. # Be aware of the administrative consequences of enabling this! # Note that 'bpf' is required for DHCP. device bpf # Berkeley packet filter # USB support device uhci # UHCI PCI->USB interface device ohci # OHCI PCI->USB interface device ehci # EHCI PCI->USB interface (USB 2.0) device usb # USB Bus (required) #device udbp # USB Double Bulk Pipe devices device ugen # Generic device uhid # "Human Interface Devices" device ukbd # Keyboard device ulpt # Printer device umass # Disks/Mass storage - Requires scbus and da device ums # Mouse device urio # Diamond Rio 500 MP3 player device uscanner # Scanners --Boundary-00=_H+CxDkImstsDUSa-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 22:10:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BCD216A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:10:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hungershausen@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F24343D49 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:10:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hungershausen@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i20so14524wra for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:10:22 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=eNTEpGxdUIEUfV0GphEaL0jgkEDMhS9l6Fn8/GPor9zAzF22Nc3mX9fC+V4dZnJDjIx+/nUTwKnKV8E2liA/LbjD5QBx7m8ciZKjvJHwJIM0sNRk/opZ8Kf+L/Ps/D+WzEYqVtRGqpcXmA8iI6vSKMFi/1TJJ3MJlo3z1dtNwNE= Received: by 10.54.71.18 with SMTP id t18mr34913wra; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:10:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.143.11 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:10:21 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:10:21 +0100 From: Rainer Hungershausen To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: 5.3 Kernel module with 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:10:23 -0000 Hi there! I've got a Highpoint RocketRAID 454 Controller running under FreeBSD 5.3. It needs a binary only driver (hpt374.ko) to run. I'd like to upgrade to 6.0 for several reasons, but the latest driver module from highpoint is for 5.3. So here's my question: Is it possible to simply run the 5.3 kernel module under 6.x? In theory this could work if the kernel interfaces haven't changed, right? Please also respond directly to me since I am not subscribed to this list. Thanks for your help, Rainer From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 22:19:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5CB516A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:19:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-3-1-cust208.cdif.cable.ntl.com [82.31.78.208]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B0B643D46 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:19:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrir.wireless.private.submonkey.net ([192.168.11.23]) by shrike.submonkey.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1EwRpa-0009J6-6b; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:19:10 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20060109195342.GA35789@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> References: <20060109195342.GA35789@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-8--289474509" Message-Id: <736C118F-A6DD-4476-9437-935C43A22771@submonkey.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ceri Davies Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:18:35 +0000 To: Michael W. Lucas X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.1 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: replacement for Acrobat Professional? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:19:18 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-8--289474509 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed On 9 Jan 2006, at 19:53, Michael W. Lucas wrote: > > Hi folks, > > I've been handed a whole bunch of PDFs and asked to make my comments > directly in them. I'm sure there's something in ports that can do > that, but my search hasn't turned up anything. (Of course, I really > have no idea what I'm looking for, which hampers the search. :-) A printer and a red biro out of the question? Ceri --Apple-Mail-8--289474509 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDxDK+me8yCsQvJJ0RApQjAKCI41jGGpZ+zk/y17jfL4MhRuRJrQCgspap g1/O9SSkeltk6WWbHCebXQw= =KyPG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-8--289474509-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 22:26:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A320C16A420 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:26:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mwlucas@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org) Received: from bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org [198.22.63.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1914C43D67 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:26:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mwlucas@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org) Received: from bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (mwlucas@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k0AMQHnZ045051; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:26:17 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mwlucas@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org) Received: (from mwlucas@localhost) by bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id k0AMQH5d045050; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:26:17 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mwlucas) Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:26:17 -0500 From: "Michael W. Lucas" To: Ceri Davies Message-ID: <20060110222616.GA45029@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> References: <20060109195342.GA35789@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> <736C118F-A6DD-4476-9437-935C43A22771@submonkey.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <736C118F-A6DD-4476-9437-935C43A22771@submonkey.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Spam-Score: (0) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 Cc: questions@freebsd.org, "Michael W. Lucas" Subject: Re: replacement for Acrobat Professional? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:26:27 -0000 On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 10:18:35PM +0000, Ceri Davies wrote: >=20 > On 9 Jan 2006, at 19:53, Michael W. Lucas wrote: >=20 > > > >Hi folks, > > > >I've been handed a whole bunch of PDFs and asked to make my comments > >directly in them. I'm sure there's something in ports that can do > >that, but my search hasn't turned up anything. (Of course, I really > >have no idea what I'm looking for, which hampers the search. :-) >=20 > A printer and a red biro out of the question? It's worked for me for twenty years now. Emailing them back to five or six people so they can make further comments is the hard part. :-) =3D=3Dml --=20 Michael W. Lucas mwlucas@FreeBSD.org, mwlucas@BlackHelicopters.org http://www.BlackHelicopters.org/~mwlucas/ "The cloak of anonymity protects me from the nuisance of caring." -Non Sequ= itur From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 23:04:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A0B16A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:04:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from annkok2001@yahoo.com) Received: from web53312.mail.yahoo.com (web53312.mail.yahoo.com [206.190.49.102]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2C06743D45 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:04:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from annkok2001@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 52322 invoked by uid 60001); 10 Jan 2006 23:04:10 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=U/c15fjKKgBZmEIbVgOQPyDw9vEE3U6aLB/odiKPfpB+MrC02aB4X7F9Z9XKgAXpm/Qe8MviyInn0qnlE7rG779GQ88EkG0A4ZkfJmaHTqLBX8ICgswtJHau9r5AhXaq88i14jNBBSwBLelMOlDYKN2+2UA4L+KPpGMQEmMmy3E= ; Message-ID: <20060110230410.52320.qmail@web53312.mail.yahoo.com> Received: from [66.49.254.13] by web53312.mail.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:04:10 PST Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:04:10 -0800 (PST) From: ann kok To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: freebsd 6.0 network question and throughput X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:04:11 -0000 Hi all I use the ipref software (andrew P suggests) to test the freebsd 6.0 network throughput both the server and client are running freebsd6.0 with intel giga em0, polling I did test it in switch or cross-over cable to connect each other it seems to have limit to 390M Could you teach me how to max the network throught? I use the freebsd as router I couldn't put in the production to test it Thank you for your help ipref -c ipaddress client connecting TCP window size: 65.0 KByte (default) [3] 0.0-10 sec 390 MBytes 328 MBytes ipref -s Server listening on TCP port 5001 TCP window size: 64.0 KBytes (default) [4] 0.0-10 sec 390 MBytes 328 MBytes __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 23:44:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDB9316A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:44:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markk@knigma.org) Received: from shrewd.pub.knigma.org (shrewd.pub.knigma.org [81.2.102.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AFC243D46 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:44:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from markk@knigma.org) Received: from lap.knigma.org (lap.wireless.knigma.org [81.187.49.100]) by shrewd.pub.knigma.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0ANiA5w007273 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:44:11 GMT (envelope-from markk@knigma.org) Message-ID: <44zpRJuHbExDFwbN@lap.knigma.org> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:44:07 +0000 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Mark Knight MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=us-ascii;format=flowed User-Agent: Turnpike/6.05-U () Subject: Matrox G450 DVI console X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:44:14 -0000 Running an up-to-date 6.0-STABLE with xorg-6.8.2. System is a dual Dell PIII with a PCI Matrox G450 to a single DVI flat panel on screen one. No second monitor. mga_hal port installed. It all works a treat until I switch from X back to the console with SHIFT-ALT-F1. This give me a blank screen with a monitor driven pop-up showing "Invalid refresh rate". If I then ALT-F7 to switch back to X the display returns normally. Any idea how I can get a clean switch from X to the console please? For logs see: Disabling ACPI (on a hunch from Google) didn't make any difference. Cheers, -- Mark A. R. Knight finger: markk@knigma.org Tel: +44 7973 410732 http://www.knigma.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 23:47:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4D9216A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:47:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from ext-gw.lemis.com (ext-gw.lemis.com [150.101.14.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08E4343D46 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:47:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from wantadilla.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.135]) by ext-gw.lemis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EEA8131DE1; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:17:52 +1030 (CST) Received: by wantadilla.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 65ABA85861; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:17:52 +1030 (CST) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:17:52 +1030 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: "Michael W. Lucas" Message-ID: <20060110234752.GO73071@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <20060109195342.GA35789@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> <736C118F-A6DD-4476-9437-935C43A22771@submonkey.net> <20060110222616.GA45029@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+wSiqF7c0ySQ2tNi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060110222616.GA45029@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 VoIP: sip:0871270137@sip.internode.on.net WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 Cc: Ceri Davies , questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: replacement for Acrobat Professional? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:47:54 -0000 --+wSiqF7c0ySQ2tNi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday, 10 January 2006 at 17:26:17 -0500, Michael W. Lucas wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 10:18:35PM +0000, Ceri Davies wrote: >> On 9 Jan 2006, at 19:53, Michael W. Lucas wrote: >>> Hi folks, >>> >>> I've been handed a whole bunch of PDFs and asked to make my comments >>> directly in them. I'm sure there's something in ports that can do >>> that, but my search hasn't turned up anything. (Of course, I really >>> have no idea what I'm looking for, which hampers the search. :-) >> >> A printer and a red biro out of the question? > > It's worked for me for twenty years now. > > Emailing them back to five or six people so they can make further > comments is the hard part. :-) It looks as if people have missed the point that you want to edit PDFs. If you find a good solution, will you post it, please? Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address and phone numbers. --+wSiqF7c0ySQ2tNi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDxEeoIubykFB6QiMRAsx0AKCIRYIq+vRXTOAGL7/339jHB3ZcgwCgs/Du rsaTncHt3XkW1SqVCuKFllM= =4kMZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+wSiqF7c0ySQ2tNi-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 00:46:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72A1B16A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 00:46:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jayobrien@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E811643D48 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 00:46:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jayobrien@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i14so30602wra for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:46:43 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=VU+DK9KgBVelNS6NtvpP6pAFjksPm8t0kT9g76SCpgkCGiuCllHcpFjWR3HNLQZBgZuQdI/HHAXOYjPGmyg3qALeY/vls7tiQQ8L8xl+gxGyMwkZ++Uf58gpFBu+e021LacRoyCN2d3Q4ip8eC/Zj8AY1xM0azH8pX8xFGheftQ= Received: by 10.54.108.2 with SMTP id g2mr1424297wrc; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:46:42 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.6? ( [66.93.180.184]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 43sm11784wri.2006.01.10.16.46.41; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:46:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <43C45570.2040009@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:46:40 -0800 From: Jay O'Brien User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050511 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: FTP stopped working - resend X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 00:46:44 -0000 (Resent as I didn't get a copy) Giorgos and Derek, Thank you for your replies. I don't know what happened, but all of a sudden ftp started working again. It could have been the Win XP machine I was using to access ftp on my server, I don't know. It was working fine, using WS_FTP Pro, to my other servers over the internet, but it wouldn't work here on its own LAN. I looked at xferlog, and saw that connection lines were entered, but the FTP LOGIN line wasn't there. Now that it is working, both lines show up in xferlog, as before. Giorgos, thanks for the example commands; All agree with your example returns except 'netstat -na | fgrep LISTEN | grep [:.]21', which returns 'grep: No match'. Am I missing something here? Thanks for the troubleshooting steps, I will review those commands and see what they do for me. Giorgios, you say "Stability is nice, isn't it? :)". Yes. But the problem is that it works so well for so long that I forget all I ever knew, and now it is obvious that I should update the system. I guess it's time to dust off the FreeBSD hat. Darek, It stopped working before I rebooted, and I have done literally nothing to this machine, except use Apache and ftp, for nearly a year. What is frustrating is that the problem went away! What now concerns me is that I did not receive a copy of my own post on this problem from the mailing list server, and I didn't get Giorgos' cc sent to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org. I used to get my posts back, but that was before I changed to this gmail account. If I don't receive this post, I'll go after that as a different problem. My ftp problem is "gone", but now a mailing list problem? Thanks again for the assistance. Jay O'Brien Rio Linda, California, USA -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: FTP stopped working Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 10:06:46 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Jay O'Brien CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <43C2146B.4060806@gmail.com> On 2006-01-08 23:44, Jay O'Brien wrote: > I'm embarassed to say that FreeBSD was working so good for me > that I forgot how to make it work. It was up for over 300 days > when I rebooted today. Oops :) > All of a sudden I cannot access the computer via ftp. I have > been able to do so using WS_FTP Pro on my Windows CP Pro > computer, but now it doesn't even seem to accept the connect. > The connect is via a local LAN, using fixed IPs. > > Guidance in a troubleshooting mode would really be appreciated. First check that you truly have the ftpd binary: root@flame:/root# ls -l /usr/libexec/ftpd -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 96360 Jan 8 13:00 /usr/libexec/ftpd Then see if ftpd is supposed to start as 'standalone' or as a service controlled by inetd: root@flame:/root# grep ftp /etc/rc.conf root@flame:/root# grep inetd /etc/rc.conf inetd_enable="YES" root@flame:/root# pgrep inet 651 root@flame:/root# grep '^[[:space:]]*ftp' /etc/inetd.conf ftp stream tcp nowait root /usr/libexec/ftpd ftpd -l If inetd is running, pgrep should report its PID as above. Seeing no PID means that inetd failed to start. Your system logs at /var/log/messages will almost certainly have clues about the reason of the failure. Then, start checking if something *is* listening at port 21: root@flame:/root# netstat -na | fgrep LISTEN | grep [:.]21 tcp4 0 0 *.21 *.* LISTEN root@flame:/root# sockstat -4 -l -p 21 USER COMMAND PID FD PROTO LOCAL ADDRESS FOREIGN ADDRESS root inetd 651 5 tcp4 *:21 *:* root@flame:/root# If you don't have any indication how ftpd was started it's possible that you manually fired up ftpd and then promptly forgot about it, until you had to reboot. Stability is nice, isn't it? :) -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: FTP stopped working Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 10:29:58 -0600 From: Derek Ragona To: Jay O'Brien References: <43C2146B.4060806@gmail.com> Jay, By default ftp logs in the system log so tail that log file as you try to ftp. That should point you to the problem. As it was working until you rebooted, what changed before the reboot? Did you add tcp wrappers or other security measures? -Derek From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 00:52:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4AE1516A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 00:52:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from user@dhp.com) Received: from shell.dhp.com (shell.dhp.com [199.245.105.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05EB143D46 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 00:52:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from user@dhp.com) Received: by shell.dhp.com (Postfix, from userid 896) id 5078B312FA; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:52:16 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:52:16 -0500 (EST) From: user To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: how should I (best practice) set up permissions for rsync ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 00:52:18 -0000 Hi, I want to rsync /usr/home from one machine to another, for purposes of backup. This would be a cinch if I just rsyncd -e ssh, as user "root" from one machine to another. The cron job runs with root perms, and the destination machine gets logged into as root and can write into the destination /usr/home. However, I sort of like the idea that root cannot ssh directly into a freebsd machine, by default. I am inclined not to change this. I also would like to keep default /usr/home permissions as they are. So how should I do this ? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 01:05:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23E5A16A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 01:05:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37C6543D49 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 01:05:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0B15I5C066858; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 02:05:19 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k0B15HA9066855; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 02:05:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 02:05:15 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: user In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20060111020418.U66079@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how should I (best practice) set up permissions for rsync ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 01:05:59 -0000 > Hi, > > I want to rsync /usr/home from one machine to another, for purposes of > backup. > i do: rsync -e "rsh" -avzrlHpogDtS --delete --delete-excluded --force \ --exclude-from=../$1-exclude root@$1:/ . where $1 is server name you may of course change rsh to ssh, and / to /usr/home :) this does EXACT copy, while it is possible it can be done better From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 01:09:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A72516A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 01:09:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@gsicomp.on.ca) Received: from skippyii.compar.com (ftp.compar.com [216.208.38.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAC5043D49 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 01:09:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matt@gsicomp.on.ca) Received: from hermes (CPE00062566c7bb-CM0011e6ede298.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [70.28.254.189]) by skippyii.compar.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k0B1BNAu038254; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:11:24 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from matt@gsicomp.on.ca) Message-ID: <012b01c6164b$bd947820$1200a8c0@gsicomp.on.ca> From: "Matt Emmerton" To: "Larry" , References: <43C40EA1.2020500@charter.net> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:09:56 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Cc: Subject: Re: runtime error (libm.so.3) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 01:09:04 -0000 > 6.0-STABLE FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE #0: Sat Dec 31 03:17:27 EST 2005...i386 > > When I try to run a certain program that I can compile and link without any > warnings or errors I get the following error message: > > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libm.so.3" not found, required by > "libGL.so.1" > > All of my ports are up-to-date. How can I get rid of this error? > > I'm compiling and linking separately like this: > > g++ -I/usr/X11R6/include -c `wx-config --cxxflags` winmain.cpp > g++ -o winmain winmain.o /usr/local/lib/compat/libm.so.3 `wx-config > --libs gl,media,std,core,base` Perhaps you need to refresh your shared library cache -- run "ldconfig -R". Is there a particular reason why you're purposely using a back-level version of libm? libm.so.4 is the version that is part of with 6.x. If you don't need a specific version, then use the -l option to link, like this: g++ -o winmain winmain.o -lm `wx-config --libs gl,media,std,core,base` Regards, -- Matt Emmerton From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 01:17:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6941316A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 01:17:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03D9743D46 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 01:17:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0B1HmV1067849 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 02:17:48 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k0B1HlXW067846 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 02:17:48 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 02:17:47 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060111021623.Q67634@chylonia.3miasto.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: vnc server problems/amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 01:17:57 -0000 FreeBSD 6.0 amd64 i tried to run it but crashes on first X client started as i386 version works i replaced Xvnc with i386 version - now works as long as i don't run any gtk/gdk based program then i got: The program 'gimp' received an X Window System error. This probably reflects a bug in the program. The error was 'BadAccess (attempt to access private resource denied)'. (Details: serial 294 error_code 10 request_code 129 minor_code 5) (Note to programmers: normally, X errors are reported asynchronously; that is, you will receive the error a while after causing it. To debug your program, run it with the --sync command line option to change this behavior. You can then get a meaningful backtrace from your debugger if you break on the gdk_x_error() function.) is anyone running VNC with FreeBSD here? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 01:21:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0C9F16A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 01:21:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70EAE43D46; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 01:21:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33FB362C894; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:21:50 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 44973-01; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:21:49 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-222-82-85.eastlink.ca [24.222.82.85]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC52162C876; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:21:49 -0400 (AST) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0821D3B230; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:21:49 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0731F3A376; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:21:49 -0400 (AST) Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:21:48 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: lars In-Reply-To: <20060110073451.GA75233@storage.mine.nu> Message-ID: <20060110211059.O1006@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20060110013542.M48499@ganymede.hub.org> <20060110073451.GA75233@storage.mine.nu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org Cc: freebsd-proaliant@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HP's iLO ... over SSH? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 01:21:51 -0000 On Tue, 10 Jan 2006, lars wrote: > "Marc G. Fournier" wrote: >> >> 'k, I figured out to go to the IP on the web to see the iLO interface, but, >> how do you do SSH into the box? I see the configuration options through >> iLO's interface, but: >> >>> ssh 192.168.1.105 >> ssh: connect to host 192.168.1.105 port 22: Connection refused >> >> so, obviously I'm mis-understanding something? Is the "Remote KVM" >> funcationality really only available through the Java based web interface? >> :( >> > In the web interface go to Administration>>Global Settings. Ok, I'm a bit confused here ... I *had* gone there originally, and everything looked to be set okay ... and, in fact, the only thing I changed this time before Apply'ng was dissabling the Serial Command Line Interface ... now I can ssh in ... Thanks ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 02:03:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABFA716A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 02:03:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brianjohn@fusemail.com) Received: from smtp-gw2.fusemail.net (smtp-gw2.fusemail.net [65.61.162.171]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 587D043D49 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 02:03:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brianjohn@fusemail.com) Received: from fusemail.com by smtp-gw2.fusemail.net with esmtp (MailAnyone extSMTP) id 1EwVIO-0006qj-Bl for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:01:04 -0500 Received: from mailanyone.net by fuse1.mailanyone.net with asmtp (MailAnyone extSMTP) id 1EwVKv-0002dI-AV; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:03:41 -0600 Message-ID: <43C46790.60906@fusemail.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 20:04:00 -0600 From: Brian John User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051002) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Rowdy References: <2417.209.87.176.132.1136833036.fusewebmail-19592@webmail.fusemail.com > <43C2BFFC.7010408@netspace.net.au> In-Reply-To: <43C2BFFC.7010408@netspace.net.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: script to monitor internet connection X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 02:03:57 -0000 Rowdy wrote: > Brian John wrote: > >> this is dsl. Sorry, I should have specified that in the beginning. >> Periodically my dsl modem will lose it's signal, I want to see just >> how often this is happening. > > > If your DSL uses PPPoE then the ppp.linkup and ppp.linkdown scripts will > be triggered when the link comes up or goes down respectively. See > ppp(8) for details and /usr/share/examples/ppp for examples. > > Rowdy > Mine uses PPPoA. Is it still possible to use these scripts? Thanks for the help /Brian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 03:27:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C55116A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 03:27:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andras@kende.com) Received: from ylpvm15.prodigy.net (ylpvm15-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.57.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE4AB43D6B for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 03:27:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andras@kende.com) Received: from pimout7-ext.prodigy.net (pimout7-int.prodigy.net [207.115.4.147]) by ylpvm15.prodigy.net (8.12.10 outbound/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k0B3RvEV004678 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:27:58 -0500 X-ORBL: [70.132.254.93] Received: from a ([70.132.254.93]) by pimout7-ext.prodigy.net (8.13.4 outbound domainkey aix/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0B3RiAc035100; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:27:48 -0500 From: "Andras Kende" To: "'Marc G. Fournier'" , Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:27:55 -0800 Message-ID: <000801c6165f$06475480$0a01a8c0@a> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <20060110125050.A48499@ganymede.hub.org> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Thread-Index: AcYWCegI2yzqZqFrQ2mBJ4vuG9gs0AAVQMnA Cc: Subject: RE: Dual Core vs HyperThreading vs Dual CPU X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 03:27:51 -0000 -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Marc G. Fournier Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 8:52 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Dual Core vs HyperThreading vs Dual CPU I'm going to assume that Dual Core is better (can't believe that they took a step back) ... but, is how does it rate? I know that HyperThreading is definitely != Dual CPU ... but how close does Dual Core get? ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I think HyperThreading is more like 2 Logical CPU Maybe some details here: http://www.short-media.com/review.php?r=261 Best regards, Andras Kende http://www.kende.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 03:34:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 001F916A420 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 03:34:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jekillen@prodigy.net) Received: from smtp101.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp101.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 88BD343D46 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 03:34:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jekillen@prodigy.net) Received: (qmail 72829 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2006 03:34:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.0.6?) (jekillen@prodigy.net@69.235.31.215 with plain) by smtp101.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Jan 2006 03:34:37 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1e96440d2112144347da7912867afe5f@prodigy.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: je killen Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:34:36 -0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.622) Subject: port installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 03:34:39 -0000 I am trying to install apache 1.3.34. I cd to the apache13 dir and attempt make install and am told that apache 1.3.33 doesn't exist. I downloaded apache 1.3.34 and put it in the /usr/ports/distfiles dir but since make is looking for v 1.3.33 it doesn't see version 1.3.34. So What now? How wouid I tell it to use 1.3.34 instead of 1.3.33? Does it require ports upgrade? What if the portupgrade utility has a different version number and when I try make install on it it looks for a different version (which is not on my system as a distfile)? I'm not complaining. I'm just trying to learn as I go. Thanks to who ever responds. JEK jekillen@prodigy.net PS: general info I discovered on my own re configuration of X server with X.org (rather than xfree86): the configuration file used to be xf86config and is now xorgconfig. I got some site posted data that called the configuration process X.org -config, which it is not. It is just xorgconfig, virtually the same script as the old xf86config script. I got my X server up after, as usual, asking stupid questions and wasting someone's time, probably, and figuring it out my self in the meantime. There is some thing magical about asking questions, even if you don't get an objective response; it's almost like telepathy. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 03:47:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81AF916A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 03:47:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from user@dhp.com) Received: from shell.dhp.com (shell.dhp.com [199.245.105.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4142B43D45 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 03:47:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from user@dhp.com) Received: by shell.dhp.com (Postfix, from userid 896) id BABC7312F5; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:47:01 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:47:01 -0500 (EST) From: user To: Wojciech Puchar In-Reply-To: <20060111020418.U66079@chylonia.3miasto.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how should I (best practice) set up permissions for rsync ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 03:47:03 -0000 On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I want to rsync /usr/home from one machine to another, for purposes of > > backup. > > > > i do: > > rsync -e "rsh" -avzrlHpogDtS --delete --delete-excluded --force > \ --exclude-from=../$1-exclude root@$1:/ . > > where $1 is server name Yeah ... I know how to do that ... I wasn't asking how to rsync it, I was asking how I could: a) keep remote root logins _disabled_ and b) keep default freebsd permissions on the /usr/home directory and still do the rsync ... in your example, you are remotely logging in as root, which I want to avoid. Any suggestions ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 03:52:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C003016A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 03:52:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andras@kende.com) Received: from ylpvm12.prodigy.net (ylpvm12-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.57.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F385B43D58 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 03:52:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andras@kende.com) Received: from pimout5-ext.prodigy.net (pimout5-int.prodigy.net [207.115.4.21]) by ylpvm12.prodigy.net (8.12.10 outbound/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k0B3qeKI020302 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:52:41 -0500 X-ORBL: [70.132.254.93] Received: from a ([70.132.254.93]) by pimout5-ext.prodigy.net (8.13.4 outbound domainkey aix/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0B3qWe6087600; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:52:36 -0500 From: "Andras Kende" To: "'je killen'" , Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:52:43 -0800 Message-ID: <001301c61662$7cecfd30$0a01a8c0@a> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: <1e96440d2112144347da7912867afe5f@prodigy.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Thread-Index: AcYWYMHBVHJwQut6SPG06u5Fd9RY3gAAM78Q Cc: Subject: RE: port installation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 03:52:43 -0000 -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of je killen Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 7:35 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: port installation I am trying to install apache 1.3.34. I cd to the apache13 dir and attempt make install and am told that apache 1.3.33 doesn't exist. I downloaded apache 1.3.34 and put it in the /usr/ports/distfiles dir but since make is looking for v 1.3.33 it doesn't see version 1.3.34. So What now? How wouid I tell it to use 1.3.34 instead of 1.3.33? Does it require ports upgrade? What if the portupgrade utility has a different version number and when I try make install on it it looks for a different version (which is not on my system as a distfile)? I'm not complaining. I'm just trying to learn as I go. Thanks to who ever responds. JEK jekillen@prodigy.net PS: general info I discovered on my own re configuration of X server with X.org (rather than xfree86): the configuration file used to be xf86config and is now xorgconfig. I got some site posted data that called the configuration process X.org -config, which it is not. It is just xorgconfig, virtually the same script as the old xf86config script. I got my X server up after, as usual, asking stupid questions and wasting someone's time, probably, and figuring it out my self in the meantime. There is some thing magical about asking questions, even if you don't get an objective response; it's almost like telepathy. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Hello, You should update the Ports tree first, which will include the latest Apache 1.3.34: # cd /usr/ports/net/cvsup-without-gui # make install # make clean Create /etc/cvsupfile: *default host=cvsup2.FreeBSD.org *default base=/usr *default prefix=/usr *default release=cvs *default tag=none *default delete use-rel-suffix *default tag=. ports-all doc-all # /usr/local/bin/cvsup -g -L2 /etc/cvsupfile # cd /usr/ports/www/apache13 # make install clean Best regards, Andras Kende http://www.kende.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 04:30:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3128916A41F; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 04:30:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C246043D45; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 04:30:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1670C62C8AE; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 00:30:21 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 80002-08; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 00:30:20 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-222-82-85.eastlink.ca [24.222.82.85]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8CB162C8AC; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 00:30:20 -0400 (AST) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 90C363B965; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 00:30:18 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC103B686; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 00:30:18 -0400 (AST) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 00:30:18 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060111002632.T1006@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org Cc: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org Subject: ciss0: *** Parity/consistency initialization ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 04:30:22 -0000 I'm in the process of bringing up a new HP DL360 server ... I configured it as a RAID1+0, and everything is looking good ... just noticed this on the console: ciss0: *** Parity/consistency initialization complete, logical drive 0 ciss0: logical drive 0 () completed consistency initialisation the way I'm reading it, this doesn't look like something to panic about, but just want to make sure while I still have it in the shop ... Thanks ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 05:32:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5A0C16A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 05:32:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dennisolvany@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C57643D46 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 05:32:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dennisolvany@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i20so75273wra for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:32:34 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:x-accept-language:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:x-enigmail-version:openpgp:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=oTTC7y6MWPLS6LlwXdsTz2N9JvPfHBhaZecUNm5mJEOMqeWISNKjrEgsaT9Zc0CoCoEuRVIxoyYHh2h5DuxZ3XfOc6sq1Y7IyffVCy7GYcb8NKbXr//S8ZKwSgfMYG8rE6QhYfKOwvDuiOtRH1KpLeSV4LcLNsqkeKblKHqtPSY= Received: by 10.54.83.7 with SMTP id g7mr460326wrb; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:32:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.10.2? ( [67.102.60.210]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 8sm190020wrl.2006.01.10.21.32.32; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:32:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <43C49836.9090405@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:31:34 -0600 From: Dennis Olvany User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051129) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andrew Fremantle References: <43C3896A.7090704@skyhawk.ca> <43C3E684.5040204@gmail.com> <43C41DF1.3070305@skyhawk.ca> In-Reply-To: <43C41DF1.3070305@skyhawk.ca> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 OpenPGP: id=D71A85AB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Advanced IPFW2 Forward rule problem / bug / misunderstanding X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 05:32:36 -0000 Andrew Fremantle wrote: > Dennis Olvany wrote: > >> This should get you most of the way there or at least give you a >> good idea of what's required. >> >> >> >> >>> options IPFIREWALL_FORWARD_EXTENDED >>> >> >> >> I'm pretty sure this will be required. >> >> >> >> >>> defaultrouter="24.85.92.1" ifconfig_rl0="192.168.1.1" >>> ifconfig_vr0="142.179.109.xxx netmask 255.255.248.0" >>> ifconfig_vr1="216.232.85.xxx netmask 255.255.254.0" >>> ifconfig_rue0="24.85.9x.xxx netmask 255.255.252.0" >>> ifconfig_rue0_alias0="24.85.9x.xxx netmask 255.255.255.255" >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> Telus ext1_ip="142.179.109.xxx" # IP Address >>> ext1_gw="142.179.104.254" # IP Gateway ext2_ip="216.232.85.xxx" >>> # IP Address ext2_gw="216.232.84.254" # IP Gateway >>> >> >> >> >> >>> Shaw Cable shaw_ip="24.85.93.xxx" # IP Address >>> shaw_gw="24.85.92.1" # IP Gateway srv2_ext="24.85.93.xxx" # >>> External IP of server >>> >> >> >> >> >>> INTERNAL int_ip="192.168.1.1" # IP Address >>> >> >> >> >> >> >>> # And run our new NATd /sbin/natd -log_ipfw_denied -i ${nat_in} >>> -o ${nat_out} -s -m -u -n ${shaw} -punch_fw 36000:100 >>> -redirect_port tcp ${ext1_srv}:22 ${ext1_ip}:xxxx -redirect_port >>> tcp ${ext1_srv}:53 ${ext1_ip}:53 -redirect_port tcp >>> ${ext1_srv}:80 ${ext1_ip}:80 -redirect_port tcp ${ext1_srv}:443 >>> ${ext1_ip}:443 -redirect_port udp ${ext1_srv}:53 ${ext1_ip}:53 >>> -redirect_port tcp ${ext2_srv}:80 ${ext2_ip}:80 -redirect_port >>> tcp ${ext2_srv}:443 ${ext2_ip}:443 -redirect_port tcp >>> ${srv1_int}:22 ${shaw_ip}:xxxx -redirect_port tcp ${srv1_int}:53 >>> ${shaw_ip}:53 -redirect_port udp ${srv1_int}:53 ${shaw_ip}:53 >>> -redirect_port tcp ${srv1_int}:80 ${shaw_ip}:80 -redirect_port >>> tcp ${srv1_int}:443 ${shaw_ip}:443 -redirect_port tcp >>> ${srv2_int}:80 ${srv2_ext}:80 -redirect_port tcp ${srv2_int}:443 >>> ${srv2_ext}:443 >>> >> >> >> That's a hefty nat command. Let's simplfy by putting it in a file. >> I leave the port forwarding to you. >> >> /etc/rc.conf >> >> natd_enable="yes" natd_flags="-f /etc/natd.conf" >> >> /etc/natd.conf >> >> instance default interface vr0 port 8668 >> >> instance telus2 interface vr1 port 8669 >> >> instance shaw1 alias_address 24.85.93.xxx port 8670 >> >> instance shaw2 alias_address 24.85.93.xxx port 8671 >> >> globalport 8672 >> >> >> I see that your firewall is based on rc.firewall. Forget >> rc.firewall, it is junk. Base your firewall on this structure. >> >> 1. Public Interface NAT Diversion >> >> 2. check-state >> >> 3. Public Interface Leak Prevention 3.1 deny egress from internal >> hosts 3.2 deny ingress to internal hosts >> >> 4. Antispoof 4.1 allow via loopback interface 4.2 deny ingress from >> router 4.3 deny ingress from internal hosts via public interface >> >> 5. Router 5.1 allow egress 5.2 deny egress 5.3 allow ingress 5.4 >> deny ingress >> >> 6. Internal Hosts 6.1 allow egress 6.2 deny egress 6.3 allow >> ingress 6.4 deny ingress >> >> 7. Default Deny >> >> >> /etc/rc.conf >> >> firewall_enable="yes" firewall_type="/etc/ipfw.rules" >> >> /etc/ipfw.rules >> >> -f flush >> >> add divert 8668 ip from any to any in via vr0 add divert 8669 ip >> from any to any in via vr1 add divert 8670 ip from any to >> 24.85.93.xxx in via rue0 add divert 8671 ip from any to >> 24.85.93.xxx in via rue0 #have never known the globalport to work >> on inbound add divert 8672 ip from any to any out via { vr0 or vr1 >> or rue0 } #not sure if that 'or' will work... may need to split it >> up >> >> check-state >> >> add deny ip from 192.168.1.1/24 to any via { vr0 or vr1 or rue0 } >> >> add allow ip from me to me via lo0 keep-state add deny ip from me >> to any in >> >> add allow ip from me to { me or 192.168.1.1/24 or >> 142.179.109.xxx/21 or 216.232.85.xxx/23 or 24.85.9x.xxx/22 } >> keep-state add forward 142.179.104.254 ip from 142.179.109.xxx to >> any keep-state add forward 216.232.84.254 ip from 216.232.85.xxx to >> any keep-state add forward 24.85.92.1 ip from 24.85.9x.xxx to any >> keep-state add forward 24.85.92.1 ip from 24.85.9x.xxx to any >> keep-state add allow ip from me to any keep-state add deny ip from >> me to any add allow icmp from any to me icmptypes 3,4,8,11 >> keep-state add deny ip from any to me >> >> add allow ip from 192.168.1.1/24 to any keep-state add deny ip from >> 192.168.1.1/24 to any add allow icmp from any to 192.168.1.1/24 >> icmptypes 3,4,11 keep-state add deny ip from any to 192.168.1.1/24 >> >> > Thank for the quick reply. > > I just want to clarify a few things here.... Given that I only want > outbound NAT on one interface, is it really necessary to run four > instances of NATd? Can't one instance handle outbound NAT + inbound > sessions on all interfaces, as I have it setup? I'm sure you'll need one instance for each public IP from which you wish to originate traffic. > Also, you're using a whole bunch of options and features here that > are not documented on the natd man page. I found a writeup by the > author of these features, but I'm not certain if that's in the > -STABLE branch or not. (IE, will these options work with a > 6.0-RELEASE natd?) Yes. I use these features with 6.0-release. > Also, I'm not certain how your forward rules would work when mine do > not, as you're doing the same thing I did - NAT Translation, then > forward to the appropriate gateway. My experience is that forwarding > packets to the appropriate gateway *does* *not* *work*, as they all > leave via the default route's interface anyways. Have a look at the routing table and examine the route to the forwarding destination. Traffic should follow the most specific route to the destination and transmit via the specified interface. You can always use static routes to achieve this. > I see your ipfw rules keeping state on NATd sessions, which I have > learned is not a good idea. Isn't it far better to let NATd handle > state on all NATd traffic, and just use ipfw to keep-state on > locally-generated sessions? Dynamic rules are perfectly acceptable with natd, with the exception of incoming connections. Do not keep-state on those. > Still, a quick glance doesen't show me any reasons why your rules > *wouldn't* work, ( At least, no more reasons than my own rules don't > work) and it is drastically more compact than my own (Though I have > an easier time visualizing packet flow with my layout). I might give > these a shot in a couple of days (I don't have physical access to the > machine right now). It's all about the nat configuration and I think using globalport is the only way you're going to get those outbound translations right. I recently created a client load-sharing nat using a very similar configuration. Concerning the shortcomings of your rules, I have no idea. I didn't even attempt to decipher them. /sbin/natd -i 8667 -o 8669 -n rue0 Let's have a look at your nat configuration. I don't know what you're trying to achieve by using different in/out ports. You've set the interface as rue0, so the nat is going to alias packets using an IP associated with that interface. If you want to alias different addresses on the same interface, you'll need to use alias_address instead of interface and run multiple instances. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jan 8 22:15:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4053916A41F for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 22:15:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mamaj1979@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com (bay19-f5.bay19.hotmail.com [64.4.53.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A52B43D45 for ; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 22:15:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mamaj1979@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 8 Jan 2006 14:15:51 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 62.90.105.47 by by19fd.bay19.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sun, 08 Jan 2006 22:15:51 GMT X-Originating-IP: [62.90.105.47] X-Originating-Email: [mamaj1979@hotmail.com] X-Sender: mamaj1979@hotmail.com From: "mamaj m" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 22:15:51 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 08 Jan 2006 22:15:51.0489 (UTC) FILETIME=[15D02310:01C614A1] X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 05:42:50 +0000 Subject: Forget Root Password X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 22:15:54 -0000 Hi, I forget the root password what can i do , so i cant log in to freebsd Thanks I _________________________________________________________________ Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 13:40:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B551F16A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 13:40:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from seaside@enjoy.email.ne.jp) Received: from mail.asahi-net.or.jp (mail1.asahi-net.or.jp [202.224.39.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ED9B43D45 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 13:40:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from seaside@enjoy.email.ne.jp) Received: from HP20632316342 (o128079.ppp.asahi-net.or.jp [202.208.128.79]) by mail.asahi-net.or.jp (Postfix) with SMTP id 8ADE526A65 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 22:40:29 +0900 (JST) Message-ID: <000901c61522$3895f1a0$0201a8c0@HP20632316342> From: "cp" To: Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 22:40:12 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 05:46:07 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-2022-jp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: acronis question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 13:40:33 -0000 hi maybe you can help! I have purchased an external hd which came with the acronis true image virsion 2.00. I made an image of my pc drive which is installed on the ex hd . This is where the confusion starts! When reading the instructions to make the image i was reccomended to make a disc which is to be used to access the data from the ex hd should my pc crash. My main question is .Is the cd i used to make the image also the cd which i need to use should i need to draw the image from my ex hd? Sorry if my mail is that of a relative newcomer to pc use ,but that is the case. thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 06:00:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEA3316A41F; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 06:00:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DC9943D49; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 06:00:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k0B5xfoO004476; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:59:42 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <43C49EC7.9020003@daleco.biz> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:59:35 -0600 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051026 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" References: <20060109195342.GA35789@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> <736C118F-A6DD-4476-9437-935C43A22771@submonkey.net> <20060110222616.GA45029@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> <20060110234752.GO73071@wantadilla.lemis.com> In-Reply-To: <20060110234752.GO73071@wantadilla.lemis.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org, "Michael W. Lucas" Subject: Re: replacement for Acrobat Professional? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 06:00:06 -0000 Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: >On Tuesday, 10 January 2006 at 17:26:17 -0500, Michael W. Lucas wrote: > > >>On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 10:18:35PM +0000, Ceri Davies wrote: >> >> >>>On 9 Jan 2006, at 19:53, Michael W. Lucas wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Hi folks, >>>> >>>>I've been handed a whole bunch of PDFs and asked to make my comments >>>>directly in them. I'm sure there's something in ports that can do >>>>that, but my search hasn't turned up anything. (Of course, I really >>>>have no idea what I'm looking for, which hampers the search. :-) >>>> >>>> >>>A printer and a red biro out of the question? >>> >>> >>It's worked for me for twenty years now. >> >>Emailing them back to five or six people so they can make further >>comments is the hard part. :-) >> >> > >It looks as if people have missed the point that you want to edit >PDFs. If you find a good solution, will you post it, please? > >Greg > > Well, I think Denny had it pretty well when he said: "http://www.freebsdsoftware.org/print/flpsed.html" #grep -i PDF /usr/ports/print/flpsed/pkg-descr Using pdftops, which is part of xpdf one can convert PDF documents to * Import and export PDF. Therefore it can be used as a PDF editor. It's up to Michael, though, to tell us how well it works, I suppose. No package in packages-6-current/Latest, so I'm building from src, and headed for bed before it gets done I imagine. Kevin Kinsey -- Zero Mostel: That's it baby! When you got it, flaunt it! Flaunt it! -- Mel Brooks, The Producers From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 06:02:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BACDC16A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 06:02:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andras@kende.com) Received: from ylpvm15.prodigy.net (ylpvm15-ext.prodigy.net [207.115.57.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4777E43D46 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 06:02:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from andras@kende.com) Received: from pimout7-ext.prodigy.net (pimout7-int.prodigy.net [207.115.4.147]) by ylpvm15.prodigy.net (8.12.10 outbound/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k0B62rEV028280 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 01:02:53 -0500 X-ORBL: [71.130.200.146] Received: from a (adsl-71-130-200-146.dsl.irvnca.pacbell.net [71.130.200.146]) by pimout7-ext.prodigy.net (8.13.4 outbound domainkey aix/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0B62iHw214858; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 01:02:45 -0500 From: "Andras Kende" To: "'mamaj m'" , Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:02:55 -0800 Message-ID: <000001c61674$ab0affc0$0a01a8c0@a> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: AcYWcfhTF2t8C/1aTsKeDF0FYxM89wAAngpQ X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Cc: Subject: RE: Forget Root Password X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 06:02:46 -0000 -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of mamaj m Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2006 2:16 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Forget Root Password Hi, I forget the root password what can i do , so i cant log in to freebsd Thanks I _________________________________________________________________ Don't just search. Find. Check out the new MSN Search! http://search.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200636ave/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Hello, during boot up there's a prompt which says to hit enter to boot /kernel or something like that. It times out after 10 seconds (default). Hit any other key than enter and type "boot-s" to boot in single user mode. You should then get a shell prompt where you run these commands: # fsck -p # mount -a -t ufs # swapon -a # passwd -l # exit Best regards, Andras Kende http://www.kende.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 06:45:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B32916A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 06:45:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from z0cool@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAC1443D49 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 06:45:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from z0cool@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a27so45004nfc for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:45:30 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=G4hZ5wUJUPeCQz8VAQ0EN58aezrioP0kY5AgFow6TI2+4dAMTZyjGd4PJrcw8xZp8l74iUzyuI0Nw23/ti1L6iSwc93KrWkISUu3GshBaKKw7fb1hTPWCL1KwvlL5UrUkbGOhcF58PidkHEq3inqrhN2yzcqKvtWNtZDWywLfSQ= Received: by 10.49.63.9 with SMTP id q9mr19663nfk; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:05:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.47.19 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 21:05:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 00:05:58 -0500 From: Chris Collins To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: search by date X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: chris@collins-ca.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 06:45:45 -0000 Hello Can somebody tell me how to search for files by the date they were created. Maybe somebody has a script they have created and would like to share. I have about 5000 files in different directories I would like to backup crate= d prior to 2003 and then delete. Any ideas? Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 06:48:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4201116A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 06:48:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hde@daden.net) Received: from mail.ruder.net (216-166-252-178.dsl.peknil.grics.net [216.166.252.178]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D35E743D45 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 06:48:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from hde@daden.net) Received: from [193.169.1.119] ([12.221.238.2]) by mail.ruder.net with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Wed, 11 Jan 2006 00:48:30 -0600 Message-ID: <43C4AA3B.5090008@foobar-qux.org> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 00:48:27 -0600 From: "Harley D. Eades III" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051013) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: chris@collins-ca.com References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jan 2006 06:48:30.0306 (UTC) FILETIME=[0852A420:01C6167B] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: search by date X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 06:48:38 -0000 Chris Collins wrote: >Hello > >Can somebody tell me how to search for files by the date they were created. >Maybe somebody has a script they have created and would like to share. I >have about 5000 files in different directories I would like to backup crated >prior to 2003 and then delete. Any ideas? > >Thanks >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > I am not sure this is possible, due to the filesystem not storing the creation date in the inode. Cheers Harley From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 07:04:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E453E16A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 07:04:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B2E043D45 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 07:04:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k0B77wP74982; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:07:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "jdow" , Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:04:26 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <04d601c615e8$f33683f0$1225a8c0@kittycat> Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: Spamcop listed - need help to diagnose why X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 07:04:31 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: jdow [mailto:jdow@earthlink.net] >Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 5:23 AM >To: danial_thom@yahoo.com; Ted Mittelstaedt; >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: Spamcop listed - need help to diagnose why > > >From: "Danial Thom" > >> >> YIKES. This is what happens when you put >> pimply-faced kids in charge of important things >> like mail. The "carpet bomb MECCA in order to >> kill a few terrorists" approach to computing. Its >> frightening. > >Yeah, maybe he'll manage to survive long enough to acquire some wisdom >such as sometimes comes with age. (And without that gained >wisdom getting >old must be unbearable.) > Uh, he's talking about you, jdow. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 07:16:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CD0316A420 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 07:16:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhfoo@nexlabs.com) Received: from tin.colossus.net (tin.colossus.net [216.121.224.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E79043D46 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 07:16:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhfoo@nexlabs.com) Received: from nexpc (63.210-193-15.adsl.qala.com.sg [210.193.15.63]) by tin.colossus.net (8.9.3p2/8.9.3) with SMTP id XAA31113; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:16:14 -0800 Message-ID: <013401c61680$23773e00$c801a8c0@nexpc> From: "Foo Ji-Haw" To: , References: Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:24:59 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Cc: Subject: Re: search by date X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 07:16:28 -0000 > Can somebody tell me how to search for files by the date they were created. > Maybe somebody has a script they have created and would like to share. I > have about 5000 files in different directories I would like to backup crated > prior to 2003 and then delete. Any ideas? You can try stat() to pick up the creation/ last modified date. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 07:48:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C8BC16A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 07:48:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C245D43D45 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 07:48:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k0B7qOP75167; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:52:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "jdow" , Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:48:51 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <04d001c615e8$a4b18090$1225a8c0@kittycat> Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: Spamcop listed - need help to diagnose why X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 07:48:55 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of jdow >Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 5:21 AM >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: Spamcop listed - need help to diagnose why > >> >> Unfortunately in the spam game, it only matters if the spammer >> thinks they didn't successfully deliver it to you. And that only >> happens if the machine delivering the spam gets an error when >> trying to deliver it, since the spammer isn't using legitimate >> senders addresses and cannot get feedback any other way. > >Sonny, you define it your way and I'll define it mine. jdow, I define it by the RFC's. If the mailserver you are fetchmailing from has mail in it's mailbox for you to fetch, then according to the SMTP RFC, delivery has occurred from the spammer. I understand that these days people seem to like to redefine words to suit their beliefs of how something should work, but just because you want to "define it your way" doesen't make it technically correct. I'm going to continue answering your message here mainly for the other readers who might be interested in the discussion. You can just quit reading now since if your going to start redefining terms for e-mail to something other than what the standard defines them as, discussion with you is completely pointless. I wonder what would happen if you went to your wife and told her that your going to redefine marriage to mean that you can sleep with some other woman. Hell, let's all let everyone redefine words however they like. After all if it's good enough for the President of the USA, then it's good enough for Joe Blow, right?!?! I do feel sorry for you since this attitude is the same attitude of the person with a broken down car who doggedly replaces part after part until he stumbles over the broken part by accident, rather than actually learning how the thing works so he can troubleshoot it properly. I am stating the facts of how your setup works and it's inherent flaws, and you obviously don't want to hear them, so you can just go away. All systems have flaws, and if the truth of the flaws in the system your running is too much for you to bear, then you are going to be happier ignorant. >The object >is to not bug the user with spam. Correct. >The secondary object is to keep >the machine load for spam as low as possible. Also correct. >You have a priority >inversion there. > No, not at all, you do. The typical M.O. for today's spammer is to find a system that has been compromised that they can use for relaying. Either a end-users system that's got a trojan in it, or a mailserver. These are used as a transmission device. When these transmitters get cranked up, they go from mailserver to mailserver, dumping hundreds to thousands of spams and spam attempts to the server. Once they exhaust their dictionaries and lists, they move on to the next server. When you do ALL spamfiltering in post-delivery mode as you do, then nothing prevents the transmitter from delivering hundreds of spams to your server and users. This takes a lot of machine load to deal with. The more pre-delivery filtering that you can do the less the load. If you blacklist by IP address then when the transmitter hits your server, if it's on a blacklist then not a single one of it's spams gets delivered, and your system spends 0 CPU time in post-processing (ie: stuff like virus scanning, content scanning, etc.) >From the users point of view, whether you pre-filter or post-filter, the amount of mail tagged as spam or blocked as spam doesen't change. But the load on the server for pre-filtering is far less than for post-filtering. That is obvious to anyone who takes the time to understand how mail works. >> I've never been a fan of post-filters for this reason. For some >> kinds of filtering - like content filtering for example - that >> is the only way you can do it. But I think it the height of >> strangeness when SA checks blacklists and such to assign scores. >> If they really cared about spamfiltering, they would use the >> IP blacklists in the way they are intended - to block access >> completely to the spammer, not even let them connect to the >> server at all. The mail that SA is assigning scores on based on >> an IP blacklist shouldn't even be in the SA filter to begin with. > >People do that and discover they have blocked paying customers and >the like. If you are going to raw block on black lists at least >setup a scoring system that has some wide testing behind it. > You are utterly full of bullcrap. In the last 3 years that the ISP I work at has used blacklists, we have had a grand total of ONE customer complain. This is on a server with tens of thousands of mailboxes and hundreds of domains. And our blacklists are set so that if they reject mail, a complete error message is included as to why they are being blacklisted. In fact, not only have we only had 1 customer complain, we have had DOZENS of adminstrators of OTHER domains thank us profusely for helping them to find mass-mailer robots that have been operating without their knowledge behind their mailservers. I've had guys tell me that they have been having many complaints from their own users for weeks about mail not being delivered, and we were the first ones that told them that not only were they on all the major blacklists, but what those lists were and why they were on them. I never expected to train corporate admins how to run their own mailservers when we instituted IP blacklists, but that is what has happened. I even got a call from a competitive ISP once that was on a number of blacklists and didn't know it, if you can believe it. Modern blacklist servers that are run right are very sophisticated as to how they detect spammers and are very good at doing it. The incidence of false positives on a well-run blacklist server is in the hundred thousands of 1 percent. That is why so many of them have been regularly DDoSed by spammers - because they are effective. You just got to know which ones are run right. >>>> Denying the spam before it's even accepted into the server is a >>>> much better way. Unfortunately, a content filter means you have to >>> >>>If you can make fetchmail do that you're pretty clever, kemo sabe. >>> >> >> No, but I can replace the Rube Goldberg fetchmail arraingement your >> using with a real mailserver that is on the Internet all the time >> and can make use of blacklist servers and such. >> >> And yes, I'm just as good at making smart-alecky comments as you >> are. Probably better at it, actually. Do you want to knock it >> off and go back to the technical merits discussion now? ;-) > >I happen to put a priority on other things. "Good enough is >good enough." Translation: you got a cheap hack working, and your fat, dumb and happy about it. Funny how people like you that claim to be proud of being mediocre, are the loudest screamers when they go to the hospital and the doctor says to them "Well, here's some aspirin, that's good enough for your broken foot" Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 09:17:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1293316A422 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:17:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2D5243DAF for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:16:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k0B9J9P75509; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 01:19:10 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: , Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 01:15:37 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <20060110132736.46926.qmail@web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: Sparc vs i386 architecture X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:17:03 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Danial Thom >Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 5:28 AM >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: RE: Sparc vs i386 architecture > > > > >--- Ted Mittelstaedt >wrote: > >> >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On >> Behalf Of Gerard Seibert >> >Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2006 7:02 AM >> >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> >Subject: Re: Sparc vs i386 architecture >> > >> > >> >Danial Thom >> > >> >> Frankly, people who spend $9000. worth of >> time >> >> dicking around with some old piece of junk >> to >> >> avoid buying a $400. computer crack me up. >> :) >> > >> >Yes, it is amassing. I have a friend who has >> spent thousands of dollars >> >keeping his old car running. He could have >> purchased a new one with a >> >new warranty, etc. and have saved all that >> money, but he refused. For >> >some individuals, the challenge is the real >> thrill that they crave. >> > >> >> That is an interesting, if very inaccurate, >> analogy, and as a car guy >> that does my own wrenching, let me tell you >> why. >> >> Computer gear every year gets cheaper and >> faster and better. Cars >> by contrast, have not improved much over the >> last 20 years - unless you >> count larger cupholders as an improvement - and >> espically they haven't >> changed at all over the last 10. Ever since >> EFI and airbags became >> standard on vehicles there just haven't been >> any compelling or significant >> improvements. In fact for many models, the >> engine designs themselves >> are the same as 20 years ago. For example the >> 2.4 Turbo used in >> the 2006 Chrysler PT Cruiser went into >> production in 1994, the 4 speed >> computer-controlled transmission used in that >> car went into production >> in 1989. Many parts for that transmission in >> fact are the same - how >> many computers do you know that you can use a >> 17 year old part in? > >you need to get out more, Ted, if you think cars >haven't improved much in 20 years. I know you >can't afford a BMW or Mercedes, but you can test >drive them for free if you put on a nice suit. >Drive a '95 BMW and a 2005 and you'll see there >are huge differences in power, handling, brakes >and a whole lot of stuff you can't see, not to >mention safety. Anti-skid brakes were a joke when >they first came out; now I can stop on a dime. >Traction control actually works now. > There have been improvements in suspension - however suspension is largely a preference thing. You for example probably would think the suspension tuning I prefer is way too harsh, I by contrast would probably think the suspension in a new BMW or Mercedes that you prefer feels like a speedboat wallowing in the river. As for brakes, a lot of the so-called "improvement" in stopping power in brakes is achieved by larger rotors - and to get these without making the wheel bigger and heavier you have to make the tire low profile - which means a more expensive tire, and a lot more frequent incidents of bent rims if the roads in your area have a lot of potholes (which is common on the east coast during the winter as the road salt and such destroys the asphalt. And safety, yes there's more airbags, and yes the bodies of cars are safer but once again, thats a tradeoff too. To make the car bodies safer the frame is strategicly weakened in areas to increase the "compressibility" of the body so that in a massive crash, the car folds up around you. The downside is that in low-speed 10-15Mph collisions where you would survive them in a less compressible body anyway, now the car has to be totaled out because the body simply folds up if it's barely tapped. Once more your getting a small increase in survivability by making everyone else have a lot more expensive-to-fix car, which drives up insurance rates. That might be agreeable until you look at the percentage of the major collisions and discover most of them were caused by drunks, who possibly the society as a whole would be better off if the drunk had died in the accident instead of being saved by the air bags. (since quite often the non-drunk people in these kinds of collisions are killed while the drunks survive, due to their bodies being more relaxed) Most of what your seeing as improvements are merely changes in the tradeoffs in automotive designs that have always existed. In the olden days, people cared more about lower lifetime maintainence costs, so manufacturers were more apt to choose a simpler and more bullet proof design, today by contrast people view cars as disposable if they go wrong, so manufacturers are more apt to choose the complex and less-bullet proof design if it creates some minor feature that they think will help them sell a car. The only real new things that have come down the pike as it were is production hybrid powertrains, but the only thing that made those a reality is massive government subsidies. 20 years ago if we had the same government subsidies in place for hybrids, we would have had them then. >But computers are not comparable to cars. It >might make sense to keep an old car going as a >new car depreciates much more than your time is >worth in the first year, and they aren't cheap. > No, they definitely aren't! And another sad fact is that as they get more computerized and more complex, the typical car problems that are appearing now more and more are beyond the capabilities of the average mechanic to fix. Just imagine for example what the Toyota Prius owners are going to be doing once their roach coaches are all out from under the Toyota warranty. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 09:29:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3095616A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:29:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dvorakv@vdsoft.org) Received: from poseidon.vdsoft.org (poseidon.vdsoft.org [193.85.147.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B403B43D79 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:29:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dvorakv@vdsoft.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by poseidon.vdsoft.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6345847E532 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:29:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from poseidon.vdsoft.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (poseidon.vdsoft.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 79461-10 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:29:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.0.0.132] (laptop.home.deltaeng.com [10.0.0.132]) by poseidon.vdsoft.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B5FB47E530 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:29:38 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43C4D004.90101@vdsoft.org> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:29:40 +0100 From: Vladimir Dvorak User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vdsoft.org Subject: quotas + jail ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:29:56 -0000 Hello, I have simple question - is possible to use quotas in jail(8) environment ? I set up my system as follows: 1. this is setting in "main" environment cat /etc/fstab | grep VSERVERS /dev/ad3s1f /VSERVERS ufs rw,noatime,groupquota=/VSERVERS/machine1/quotagroup,userquota=/VSERVERS/machine1/quotauser 2 2 2. this is setting in jail(8) /dev/ad3s1f / ufs rw,noatime,soft-updates,groupquota=/quotagroup,userquota=/quotauser But still cannot use quotas in jail. I thought if I have access to quotagroup and quotauser files, I can simply use quotas advantages. I try root@machine1# /etc/rc.d/quota restart quotaoff: /: Operation not permitted quotaoff: /: Operation not permitted Checking quotas: done. Enabling quotas:quotaon: using /quotagroup on quotaon: /: Operation not permitted quotaon: using /quotauser on quotaon: /: Operation not permitted done. It seems to be impossible ( some kernel restriction ). :-( Is there some way to allow this ? My last idea was to replicate users and groups to "main" system and use quotas from it - but it is not good solution if we have several hundreds users in jail(8). Thank you ! Vladimir Dvorak From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 09:31:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D96A616A41F; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:31:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 458E043D70; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:31:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k0B9ZDP75612; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 01:35:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Tillman Hodgson" , , Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 01:31:41 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <20060110144758.GU25702@seekingfire.com> Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: Compaq ProLiant 1600 server freezes when detecting keyboard X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:31:47 -0000 Another thing you really need to watch and that isn't common knowledge with Compaq proliants, is the use of non-Compaq disk drives in the systems. It isn't recommended and sometimes will cause problems like this. Compaq actually has a huge program that they distribute that you expand onto about 20 or so floppies, which's sole purpose is to boot the server into DOS and do firmware updates to their hard disk drives. Because of the length of time it takes to deal with this on a server with a big array, it's quite often ignored by techs. Because of this few techs ever stop to ask the question of why is this necessary? After all the hard drives in the array are OEMed to Compaq from someone like Seagate or such, Compaq certainly doesen't make it's own drives. Yet the frequency of firmware updates to generally available disk drives from the major manufacturers is much less. So then why do you see 3-4 disk drive firmware updates for Compaq-branded disk drives, yet the same model Seagate that isn't Compaq branded, you don't see this on Seagate's site? Compaq has a long history of tampering with peripheral firmware. For example I've got on my desk a Compaq professional workstation that has an Adaptec scsi controller in it - the card looks identical to a standard off-the-shelf Adaptec SCSI card - yet if I take this card and swap it out with the same model scsi card in a random system, that random system will refuse to boot. I've got back at the shop a Compaq DL360 (early generation) that has the same spontaneous reboot problem with Solaris x86. Yet if I put FreeBSD on it, it never reboots, and if I put the Solaris on a different Compaq DL360 we have that was bought at a similar time, it runs rock solid. The only difference between the 2 DL360s is the disks in the one with the reboot problem - they are aftermarket, not from Compaq. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 09:31:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D96A616A41F; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:31:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 458E043D70; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:31:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k0B9ZDP75612; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 01:35:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Tillman Hodgson" , , Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 01:31:41 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <20060110144758.GU25702@seekingfire.com> Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: Compaq ProLiant 1600 server freezes when detecting keyboard X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:31:47 -0000 Another thing you really need to watch and that isn't common knowledge with Compaq proliants, is the use of non-Compaq disk drives in the systems. It isn't recommended and sometimes will cause problems like this. Compaq actually has a huge program that they distribute that you expand onto about 20 or so floppies, which's sole purpose is to boot the server into DOS and do firmware updates to their hard disk drives. Because of the length of time it takes to deal with this on a server with a big array, it's quite often ignored by techs. Because of this few techs ever stop to ask the question of why is this necessary? After all the hard drives in the array are OEMed to Compaq from someone like Seagate or such, Compaq certainly doesen't make it's own drives. Yet the frequency of firmware updates to generally available disk drives from the major manufacturers is much less. So then why do you see 3-4 disk drive firmware updates for Compaq-branded disk drives, yet the same model Seagate that isn't Compaq branded, you don't see this on Seagate's site? Compaq has a long history of tampering with peripheral firmware. For example I've got on my desk a Compaq professional workstation that has an Adaptec scsi controller in it - the card looks identical to a standard off-the-shelf Adaptec SCSI card - yet if I take this card and swap it out with the same model scsi card in a random system, that random system will refuse to boot. I've got back at the shop a Compaq DL360 (early generation) that has the same spontaneous reboot problem with Solaris x86. Yet if I put FreeBSD on it, it never reboots, and if I put the Solaris on a different Compaq DL360 we have that was bought at a similar time, it runs rock solid. The only difference between the 2 DL360s is the disks in the one with the reboot problem - they are aftermarket, not from Compaq. Ted From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 10:02:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9258016A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:02:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0829543D70 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:02:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k0BA5sP76167; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 02:05:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Wojciech Puchar" , Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 02:02:21 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1250" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <20060110221936.A20557@chylonia.3miasto.net> Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: FreeBSD & time travel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:02:33 -0000 Did the server reboot and you not know it? Maybe it rebooted and the internal clock got reset to Jan 1 2000, and when it came back up it picked up that time? Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Wojciech Puchar >Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 1:21 PM >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: FreeBSD & time travel > > >while running my FreeBSD/amd64 server a couple of days it once >change it's >time to midnight 1 january 2000. of course lots of services >failed to work >undil i did rdate > >can it be hardware or software bug? >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.16/225 - Release >Date: 1/9/2006 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 10:16:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5457F16A420 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:16:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C00AC43D75 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:16:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k0BAJUP76234; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 02:19:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "Brian John" , "Rowdy" Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 02:15:58 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 In-Reply-To: <43C46790.60906@fusemail.com> Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: script to monitor internet connection X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:16:05 -0000 Yes. You need to set your DSL modem into Bridged mode then setup PPP on the FreeBSD system One big benefit is that when you do this your FreeBSD system gets a public IP address on it, rather than the public IP going to the outside of some NAT in your DSL modem that may or may not work with all protocols you want to run. Ted >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Brian John >Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 6:04 PM >To: Rowdy >Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: script to monitor internet connection > > >Rowdy wrote: > >> Brian John wrote: >> >>> this is dsl. Sorry, I should have specified that in the beginning. >>> Periodically my dsl modem will lose it's signal, I want to see just >>> how often this is happening. >> >> >> If your DSL uses PPPoE then the ppp.linkup and ppp.linkdown >scripts will >> be triggered when the link comes up or goes down respectively. See >> ppp(8) for details and /usr/share/examples/ppp for examples. >> >> Rowdy >> >Mine uses PPPoA. Is it still possible to use these scripts? > >Thanks for the help > >/Brian >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.16/225 - Release >Date: 1/9/2006 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 10:16:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9348C16A462 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:16:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from f.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (mail.esiee.fr [147.215.1.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2813643D55 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:16:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from f.bonnet@esiee.fr) Received: from mail.esiee.fr (localhost.esiee.fr [127.0.0.1]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id 4466F365917 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:16:11 +0100 (CET) Received: from [147.215.1.21] (lisa.esiee.fr [147.215.1.21]) by mail.esiee.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25FAA365911 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:16:11 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43C4DAEB.3000105@esiee.fr> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:16:11 +0100 From: Frank Bonnet User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051110) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: apache22 port ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:16:13 -0000 Hello Trying to install it on a new machine I noticed this morning that the apache22 port is missing , any infos ? Thanks a lot. -- Regards Frank Bonnet From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 10:20:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68BE516A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:20:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from crispy.beef@ntlworld.com) Received: from mta07-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (mta07-winn.ispmail.ntl.com [81.103.221.47]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 996DB43D45 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:20:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from crispy.beef@ntlworld.com) Received: from aamta12-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mta07-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20060111102037.JVTF21883.mta07-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamta12-winn.ispmail.ntl.com>; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:20:37 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.2] (really [82.12.81.129]) by aamta12-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20060111102037.PXDS20369.aamta12-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@[192.168.0.2]>; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:20:37 +0000 Message-ID: <43C4DBF2.6040907@ntlworld.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:20:34 +0000 From: Crispy Beef User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frank Bonnet References: <43C4DAEB.3000105@esiee.fr> In-Reply-To: <43C4DAEB.3000105@esiee.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: apache22 port ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:20:39 -0000 Frank Bonnet wrote: > Hello > > Trying to install it on a new machine I noticed this morning that the > apache22 port is missing , any infos ? It should be there under '/usr/ports/www/apache22', I installed it a couple of days ago... Might be worth refreshing your ports with cvsup or something. -- Paul From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 10:28:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2103916A42C for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:28:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B6AD43DAE for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:28:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0BARoaJ012222 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:27:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k0BARoZG012219 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:27:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:27:50 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060111112654.O11627@chylonia.3miasto.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: limiting Buf memory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:28:41 -0000 on my 1GB machine: Mem: 529M Active, 209M Inact, 149M Wired, 38M Cache, 109M Buf, 1772K Free while "Cache" is dynamic, Buf is not and never goes down. how can i get it down to somehow like 40MB? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 10:43:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 077DB16A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:43:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from barry.byrne@wbtsystems.com) Received: from mail.wbtsystems.com (onyx.dublin.wbtsystems.com [193.120.231.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C92D843D75 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:42:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from barry.byrne@wbtsystems.com) Received: from SUNYA (sunya.wbt.wbtsystems.com [10.12.1.105]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.wbtsystems.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k0BAgAUm019849 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:42:11 GMT From: "Barry Byrne" To: "'freebsd'" Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:42:10 -0000 Message-ID: <000001c6169b$ad19d0d0$69010c0a@dublin.wbtsystems.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 thread-index: AcYWm6yn4bxMgiw4S/yUpLqFATvUqQ== X-WBT-Authenticated-User: bb X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 Subject: Mysql-5.018 fails to build from the ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:43:03 -0000 Hi: I've got a freebsd 4.11-release box which is kept up to date using portupgrade. Haven't had any problem until recently - but now attempting to build mysql 5.0.18 fails. It worked as far as .16, but both .17 and .18 have failed. I get the following error: ------------------- libtool15: link: cannot find the library `../zlib/libz.la' or unhandled argument `../zlib/libz.la' *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql50-client/work/mysql-5.0.18/libmysql_r. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql50-client/work/mysql-5.0.18. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql50-client/work/mysql-5.0.18. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql50-client. ------------------- The other thing I notice is early on in the configure script, I get the following notice about zlib not being found - though I thought zlib was bundled system-wide. ------------------- checking for zlib compression library... system-wide zlib not found, using one bundled with MySQL ------------------- Any help in solving this would be appreciated. Thanks, Barry From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 10:43:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B62D916A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:43:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 810A643D92 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:42:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0BAgj3Y013442; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:42:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k0BAgeSc013427; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:42:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:42:40 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: Ted Mittelstaedt In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20060111114215.T13361@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: FreeBSD & time travel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:43:41 -0000 > Did the server reboot and you not know it? Maybe it rebooted and no uptime was over 3 days! that's strange as FreeBSD does have system time counter > the internal clock got reset to Jan 1 2000, and when it came back > up it picked up that time? > > Ted > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Wojciech Puchar >> Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 1:21 PM >> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> Subject: FreeBSD & time travel >> >> >> while running my FreeBSD/amd64 server a couple of days it once >> change it's >> time to midnight 1 january 2000. of course lots of services >> failed to work >> undil i did rdate >> >> can it be hardware or software bug? >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> -- >> No virus found in this incoming message. >> Checked by AVG Free Edition. >> Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.16/225 - Release >> Date: 1/9/2006 >> > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 12:13:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0A1916A41F; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:13:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mwlucas@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org) Received: from bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org [198.22.63.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B1FC43D5C; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:13:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mwlucas@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org) Received: from bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (mwlucas@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k0BCDJnZ050116; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 07:13:19 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mwlucas@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org) Received: (from mwlucas@localhost) by bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id k0BCDJLR050115; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 07:13:19 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mwlucas) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 07:13:19 -0500 From: "Michael W. Lucas" To: Kevin Kinsey Message-ID: <20060111121319.GA50063@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> References: <20060109195342.GA35789@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> <736C118F-A6DD-4476-9437-935C43A22771@submonkey.net> <20060110222616.GA45029@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> <20060110234752.GO73071@wantadilla.lemis.com> <43C49EC7.9020003@daleco.biz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43C49EC7.9020003@daleco.biz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Spam-Score: (0) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 Cc: questions@freebsd.org, "Michael W. Lucas" Subject: Re: replacement for Acrobat Professional? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:13:49 -0000 On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:59:35PM -0600, Kevin Kinsey wrote: > >It looks as if people have missed the point that you want to edit > >PDFs. If you find a good solution, will you post it, please? Absolutely. Actually, I'll be posting my results for posterity anyway. > Well, I think Denny had it pretty well when he said: > "http://www.freebsdsoftware.org/print/flpsed.html" > > #grep -i PDF /usr/ports/print/flpsed/pkg-descr > Using pdftops, which is part of xpdf one can convert PDF documents to > * Import and export PDF. Therefore it can be used as a PDF editor. This looks like the best option to me. I missed this in my search. :-( I never thought I'd say this, but we have too *much* software available... ==ml -- Michael W. Lucas mwlucas@FreeBSD.org, mwlucas@BlackHelicopters.org http://www.BlackHelicopters.org/~mwlucas/ "The cloak of anonymity protects me from the nuisance of caring." -Non Sequitur From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 12:39:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E577B16A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:39:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.daemonsecurity.com (59.Red-81-33-11.staticIP.rima-tde.net [81.33.11.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 725AF43D48 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:39:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [172.24.8.84] (generic.ATOSORIGIN.ES [212.170.156.200]) by strange.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17E192E0A5; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:39:36 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43C4FCB6.9020607@locolomo.org> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:40:22 +0100 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: chris@collins-ca.com References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: search by date X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:39:41 -0000 Chris Collins wrote: > Can somebody tell me how to search for files by the date they were created. > Maybe somebody has a script they have created and would like to share. I > have about 5000 files in different directories I would like to backup crated > prior to 2003 and then delete. Any ideas? Check find(1) Unfortunately if you try to specify a specific age this is not in Unix time but in 24h intervals relative to when find was started. The -newer option on the other hand allows you to find all files created/accessed/modified since the times of a given file. The idea is that if you do incremental backups, you stamp a file in the backup dir and use that as reference to find which files have been modified since last backup. Cheers, Erik From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 12:43:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5CA616A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:43:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from carpetsmoker@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 511D443D4C for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:43:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from carpetsmoker@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 57so126304wri for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 04:43:53 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=VYwQ5nm7bTT8ZMP+dJ1yOu472ciA75yPfd3SWmzJxWcVqLz3c6mEPqGQeZW8B9eZ6KPNJrCEYzO7DcN+rTi3zLJJ3Qt2J181RUq8/sGqsRXUtdBSMA5kL0K8wdQafBIDPdor6nB1666A8LiOddO3XbZnhWVMpJ5s/Cur9bqNdA4= Received: by 10.65.186.11 with SMTP id n11mr204593qbp; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 04:43:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.72.1 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 04:43:53 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4dd4cddf0601110443r5e726a86t@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:43:53 +0000 From: Martin Tournoy To: Josh Paetzel In-Reply-To: <200601101604.55833.josh@tcbug.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200601101604.55833.josh@tcbug.org> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Slow 2d performance in X / opera / nvidia drivers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:43:54 -0000 On 10/01/06, Josh Paetzel wrote: > gimpy# uname -a > FreeBSD gimpy.tcbug.org 5.4-RELEASE-p8 FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p8 #9: Fri > Jan 6 20:26:44 CST 2006 > jpaetzel@gimpy.tcbug.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GIMPY i386 > > dmesg attached > > Xorg config attached > > Kernel config attached > > I've been having terrible 2d performance with opera (linux-opera and > native 8.51 and 9.0) using the nvidia drivers. When I windowshade it > and then restore it there is a sizeable delay while it redraws the > window. If I rapidly shade and restore the window my idle CPU time > goes to 0% and mp3 playback will occassionally skip. > > The problem first started when Opera 8 was released, I hoped that > further releases would address it but so far that has not been the > case. Any suggestions for a fix welcome. > > (Yes, I have been seeking support on opera.com but this feels like a > FreeBSD mis-configuration of some sort on my end. :) > > -- > Thanks, > > Josh Paetzel > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > > > You might try turning the twinview of, it takes up heaps of resources on my machine, then again, your machine has 300% more RAM and clockspeed, so it should be able to handle it fine.... Try using freebsd AGP, the nvidia should work better but you might want to try it anyway... Which window manager do you use, I noted that KDE can be really, really slow even on newer machines (Krap Desktop Enviorment) Is this problem ONLY with opera? or with other applications to? if you have another QT application you might want try how that runs. Also check you QT version, maybe it's ancient? Did you try using both the static/shared QT versions? If not, it might make a diffrence. Don't post your dmesg again please, it makes me drool which makes my keyboard dirty.. 95 gig SCSI HDD *drool* From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 12:55:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF7A216A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:55:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.daemonsecurity.com (59.Red-81-33-11.staticIP.rima-tde.net [81.33.11.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4695143D4C for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:55:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [172.24.8.84] (generic.ATOSORIGIN.ES [212.170.156.200]) by strange.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 029AF2E0A5; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:55:46 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43C50087.5050008@locolomo.org> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:56:39 +0100 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: user References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: how should I (best practice) set up permissions for rsync ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:55:48 -0000 user wrote: > I want to rsync /usr/home from one machine to another, for purposes of > backup. > > This would be a cinch if I just rsyncd -e ssh, as user "root" from one > machine to another. The cron job runs with root perms, and the > destination machine gets logged into as root and can write into the > destination /usr/home. > > However, I sort of like the idea that root cannot ssh directly into a > freebsd machine, by default. I am inclined not to change this. > > I also would like to keep default /usr/home permissions as they are. 1st: you could reverse the connection so the backup machine fetches from the server, this means that the user that logs into the server only need read access. 2nd: maybe you want to have incremental backups so you can go back a number of days? I don't know your system, but it happens that users delete some vital file and don't get it restored right away. You can create a tar-archive preserving owner, group and permissions. In that case, your server should push the archive to the backup host otherwise you may get problems with clocks not being in sync or backup on the server not finishing before the backup is fetched. The advantage is that you can create the tar archive as root, change owner/group and send it to the backup host using ssh and login to a restricted account. I worked as an administrator, the backup policy was: * full backup on tape on weekdays, that is at night when activity is low, change tape every day * backup only changes during weekends, same tape (the friday tape) * latest two backup tapes stored on external site * tapes cycled with 2 weeks interval, every fortnight the daily backup was queued in the two week backup line with longer storage time before the tape was recycled. Now, this is a quite expensive backup policy. Just FYI. Cheers, Erik From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 13:11:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FA8B16A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:11:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33313.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33313.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.128]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8DF8D43D5A for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:11:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 66918 invoked by uid 60001); 11 Jan 2006 13:11:16 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=umB+mMaYThGaIwmbs1tuGK4ehjyVkafV5vzYULhczTGQDmF/dN7BftsQfctvsnbvcJisgCNoCAT5I7Sd6ER9PuE2ZXEloMndHUcEk6xsN4XOuC/prRcKZDwUikZ6W16n1k6mQOQBmDbasGkS9EPBVgPF6AHT3z4vdkr3Lzsm+S0= ; Message-ID: <20060111131116.66916.qmail@web33313.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33313.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 05:11:16 PST Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 05:11:16 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: Ted Mittelstaedt , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: RE: Sparc vs i386 architecture X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:11:18 -0000 --- Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > > >-----Original Message----- > >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On > Behalf Of Danial Thom > >Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 5:28 AM > >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >Subject: RE: Sparc vs i386 architecture > > > > > > > > > >--- Ted Mittelstaedt > >wrote: > > > >> > >> > >> >-----Original Message----- > >> >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >> > >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On > >> Behalf Of Gerard Seibert > >> >Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2006 7:02 AM > >> >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >> >Subject: Re: Sparc vs i386 architecture > >> > > >> > > >> >Danial Thom > >> > > >> >> Frankly, people who spend $9000. worth of > >> time > >> >> dicking around with some old piece of > junk > >> to > >> >> avoid buying a $400. computer crack me > up. > >> :) > >> > > >> >Yes, it is amassing. I have a friend who > has > >> spent thousands of dollars > >> >keeping his old car running. He could have > >> purchased a new one with a > >> >new warranty, etc. and have saved all that > >> money, but he refused. For > >> >some individuals, the challenge is the real > >> thrill that they crave. > >> > > >> > >> That is an interesting, if very inaccurate, > >> analogy, and as a car guy > >> that does my own wrenching, let me tell you > >> why. > >> > >> Computer gear every year gets cheaper and > >> faster and better. Cars > >> by contrast, have not improved much over the > >> last 20 years - unless you > >> count larger cupholders as an improvement - > and > >> espically they haven't > >> changed at all over the last 10. Ever since > >> EFI and airbags became > >> standard on vehicles there just haven't been > >> any compelling or significant > >> improvements. In fact for many models, the > >> engine designs themselves > >> are the same as 20 years ago. For example > the > >> 2.4 Turbo used in > >> the 2006 Chrysler PT Cruiser went into > >> production in 1994, the 4 speed > >> computer-controlled transmission used in > that > >> car went into production > >> in 1989. Many parts for that transmission > in > >> fact are the same - how > >> many computers do you know that you can use > a > >> 17 year old part in? > > > >you need to get out more, Ted, if you think > cars > >haven't improved much in 20 years. I know you > >can't afford a BMW or Mercedes, but you can > test > >drive them for free if you put on a nice suit. > >Drive a '95 BMW and a 2005 and you'll see > there > >are huge differences in power, handling, > brakes > >and a whole lot of stuff you can't see, not to > >mention safety. Anti-skid brakes were a joke > when > >they first came out; now I can stop on a dime. > >Traction control actually works now. > > > > There have been improvements in suspension - > however > suspension is largely a preference thing. You > for example probably would think the suspension > tuning I prefer is way too harsh, I by contrast > would > probably think the suspension in a new BMW or > Mercedes that you prefer feels like a speedboat > wallowing in the river. As for brakes, a lot > of the > so-called "improvement" in stopping power in > brakes > is achieved by larger rotors - and to get these > > without making the wheel bigger and heavier you > have to make the tire low profile - which means > a > more expensive tire, and a lot more frequent > incidents > of bent rims if the roads in your area have a > lot of > potholes (which is common on the east coast > during the > winter as the road salt and such destroys the > asphalt. > > And safety, yes there's more airbags, and yes > the > bodies of cars are safer but once again, thats > a tradeoff too. To make the car bodies safer > the > frame is strategicly weakened in areas to > increase > the "compressibility" of the body so that in a > massive > crash, the car folds up around you. The > downside is > that in low-speed 10-15Mph collisions where you > would > survive them in a less compressible body > anyway, now the > car has to be totaled out because the body > simply folds > up if it's barely tapped. Once more your > getting > a small increase in survivability by making > everyone else have a lot more expensive-to-fix > car, > which drives up insurance rates. That might be > agreeable until you look at the percentage of > the > major collisions and discover most of them were > caused > by drunks, who possibly the society as a whole > would > be better off if the drunk had died in the > accident > instead of being saved by the air bags. (since > quite often the non-drunk people in these kinds > of > collisions are killed while the drunks survive, > due to their bodies being more relaxed) > > Most of what your seeing as improvements are > merely > changes in the tradeoffs in automotive designs > that > have always existed. In the olden days, people > cared more about lower lifetime maintainence > costs, > so manufacturers were more apt to choose a > simpler > and more bullet proof design, today by contrast > people view cars as disposable if they go > wrong, > so manufacturers are more apt to choose the > complex > and less-bullet proof design if it creates some > minor feature that they think will help them > sell > a car. > > The only real new things that have come down > the > pike as it were is production hybrid > powertrains, > but the only thing that made those a reality is > massive > government subsidies. 20 years ago if we had > the same > government subsidies in place for hybrids, we > would > have had them then. The ability of a car to handle perfectly at 100Mph is more than just a minor improvement, unless you just use a car to take you to the train station or to the market. The problem with your arguments is that the same stupid logic can be applied to computers. If your only use for a computer is to do email and light browsing, then there is no difference between today's computers and one that is 5 years old. Dt __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 13:19:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 481C516A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:19:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from efacilitas.de (smtp.efacilitas.de [85.10.196.108]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1DEF43D46 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:19:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bkoenig@cs.tu-berlin.de) Received: from eurystheus.local (port-212-202-169-24.dynamic.qsc.de [212.202.169.24]) by efacilitas.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 599EC4C47B; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:28:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.1.2] (muhkuh.local [192.168.1.2]) by eurystheus.local (Postfix) with ESMTP id 751785285C; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:18:27 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43C505F8.4030307@cs.tu-berlin.de> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:19:52 +0100 From: =?windows-1250?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Vladimir Dvorak References: <43C4D004.90101@vdsoft.org> In-Reply-To: <43C4D004.90101@vdsoft.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1250; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: quotas + jail ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:19:51 -0000 Vladimir Dvorak schrieb: > I have simple question - is possible to use quotas in jail(8) environment ? > [...] > > It seems to be impossible ( some kernel restriction ). :-( Is there some > way to allow this ? My last idea was to replicate users and groups to > "main" system and use quotas from it - but it is not good solution if we > have several hundreds users in jail(8). You don't need to replicate users and groups, just use UIDs and GIDs. There is a serious disadvantage: if you set quota for a specific UID then it affects all users with the same UID in different jails and even at the host; I guess this is not what you want. If you want to restrict the space that can be consumed by a jail then you might use memory devices, i.e. # create 1 GiB file $ dd if=/dev/zero of=myjail321 count=16k bs=64k $ mdconfig -af myjail321 md321 $ mkdir /jail/myjail321 $ mount /dev/md321 /jail/myjail321 $ cd /usr/src $ make installworld DESTDIR=/jail/myjail321 and so on ... Regards Björn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 13:31:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABB1816A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:31:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dvorakv@vdsoft.org) Received: from poseidon.vdsoft.org (poseidon.vdsoft.org [193.85.147.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 368AD43D45 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:31:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dvorakv@vdsoft.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by poseidon.vdsoft.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B468747E532; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:31:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from poseidon.vdsoft.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (poseidon.vdsoft.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 82361-06; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:31:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.0.0.132] (laptop.home.deltaeng.com [10.0.0.132]) by poseidon.vdsoft.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A361F47E530; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:31:35 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43C508BA.1090303@vdsoft.org> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:31:38 +0100 From: Vladimir Dvorak User-Agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?windows-1250?Q?Bj=F6rn_K=F6nig?= References: <43C4D004.90101@vdsoft.org> <43C505F8.4030307@cs.tu-berlin.de> In-Reply-To: <43C505F8.4030307@cs.tu-berlin.de> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1250 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vdsoft.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: quotas + jail ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:31:42 -0000 Björn König wrote: > Vladimir Dvorak schrieb: > >> I have simple question - is possible to use quotas in jail(8) >> environment ? >> [...] >> >> It seems to be impossible ( some kernel restriction ). :-( Is there some >> way to allow this ? My last idea was to replicate users and groups to >> "main" system and use quotas from it - but it is not good solution if we >> have several hundreds users in jail(8). > > > You don't need to replicate users and groups, just use UIDs and GIDs. > There is a serious disadvantage: if you set quota for a specific UID > then it affects all users with the same UID in different jails and > even at the host; I guess this is not what you want. > > If you want to restrict the space that can be consumed by a jail then > you might use memory devices, i.e. > > # create 1 GiB file > $ dd if=/dev/zero of=myjail321 count=16k bs=64k > $ mdconfig -af myjail321 > md321 > $ mkdir /jail/myjail321 > $ mount /dev/md321 /jail/myjail321 > $ cd /usr/src > $ make installworld DESTDIR=/jail/myjail321 > > and so on ... > > > Regards > Björn > Thank you Björn, I thing it is possible. I will shift existing UIDs ( in jail) to higher values (50000-> ) and apply quotas on them. I will try to eliminate UID mixing. Thank you for your suggestion. Vladimir From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 14:06:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12A4116A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:06:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gandalf@messias.qhigh.com) Received: from messias.qhigh.com (3e44a6f1.adsl.enternet.hu [62.68.166.241]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F2DC43D45 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:06:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gandalf@messias.qhigh.com) Received: from [172.16.0.26] (earth.msnet [172.16.0.26]) by messias.qhigh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC2135C1E for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:12:15 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43C51106.6030607@messias.qhigh.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:07:02 +0100 From: User Gandalf User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051228) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Create more dsp and mixer devices X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:06:23 -0000 Hello, The gaim instant messenger has support for three sound devices: ESD, Arts and using a command. I'm not sure what 'ESD' means. Is it the 'esound' package? (Enlightment sound daemon.) Somewhere I read that FreeBSD can do the same (e.g. sharing one audio device to multiple programs). Can you point me to a documentation where I can read more about this? I would like to know if it is worth to install esound. What other options do I have if I want to use gaim with sounds? Thanks, Les From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 14:13:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 752B516A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:13:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mich@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.itxmarket.com (fw.itxmarket.com [213.11.40.109]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00CB543D94 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:12:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mich@FreeBSD.org) Received: from icommerce.fr (mich2.itxmarket.com [192.168.2.26]) by mail2.itxmarket.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86EB81C08CE; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:12:48 +0100 (CET) Received: by icommerce.fr (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7E69E2281F; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:12:48 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:12:48 +0100 From: Michael Landin Hostbaek To: User Gandalf Message-ID: <20060111141248.GS40256@mich2.itxmarket.com> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Landin Hostbaek , User Gandalf , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <43C51106.6030607@messias.qhigh.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43C51106.6030607@messias.qhigh.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE i386 X-PGP-Key: http://www.freebsdcluster.org/~mich/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Create more dsp and mixer devices X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:13:02 -0000 User Gandalf (gandalf) writes: > > Hello, > > The gaim instant messenger has support for three sound devices: ESD, > Arts and using a command. I'm not sure what 'ESD' means. Is it the > 'esound' package? (Enlightment sound daemon.) Somewhere I read that > FreeBSD can do the same (e.g. sharing one audio device to multiple > programs). Can you point me to a documentation where I can read more > about this? http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sound-setup.html#SOUND-MULTIPLE-SOURCES /mich From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 14:20:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76D7A16A420 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:20:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from hermes2.cf.ac.uk (hermes2.cf.ac.uk [131.251.0.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9952F43D45 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:20:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrir.insrv.cf.ac.uk ([131.251.50.213]) by hermes2.cf.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EwgqH-0008QB-5D; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:20:49 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20060109090131.GY24383@math.jussieu.fr> References: <20060109090131.GY24383@math.jussieu.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-3--231741405" Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ceri Davies Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:20:48 +0000 To: shih@math.jussieu.fr X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.1 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: Cardiff University Sophos AV Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portsnap vs cvsup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:20:51 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-3--231741405 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On 9 Jan 2006, at 09:01, Albert Shih wrote: > Hi all > > What's the advantage of portsnap vs old-fashion cvsup ? cvsup only runs on a very limited set of architectures and forces you to build or fetch INDEX files yourself. Having said that, it's useful in non ports/ situations too. Ceri --Apple-Mail-3--231741405 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDxRREme8yCsQvJJ0RAuDYAJ0bHOPQss8hG0qdq3C9ejcsYvtV2QCfSWpb UTHKWTAlKnCFGZZf/0cWcVM= =N268 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-3--231741405-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 14:22:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46B7216A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:22:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from hermes2.cf.ac.uk (hermes2.cf.ac.uk [131.251.0.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0964343D92 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:22:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrir.insrv.cf.ac.uk ([131.251.50.213]) by hermes2.cf.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Ewgro-0008UV-HJ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:22:24 +0000 In-Reply-To: <43C3C414.5090603@northwestern.edu> References: <43C3C414.5090603@northwestern.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-4--231640925" Message-Id: <0FAC6B95-E91D-46A3-B0E1-E4676A8C8027@submonkey.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ceri Davies Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:22:28 +0000 To: Bret Walker X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.1 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: Cardiff University Sophos AV Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Discovering File System Corruption X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:22:45 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-4--231640925 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On 10 Jan 2006, at 14:26, Bret Walker wrote: > I have a 6.0-RELEASE-p1 box with a GENERIC kerbnel that I'm having > some > trouble with. > > I recently reconstituted the machine from being a 5.4 box. I didn't > upgrade, I reinstalled. > > When I was trying to install tripwire, kept getting this message: > "./bin/i386-unknown-freebsd_r/siggen missing. Build did not complete > successfully. > *** Error code 1" > > I CVSupped a few times, even deleting the tripwire directory > completely > and letting CVSup re-add it. I finally fixed the problem by copying > the > missing file from another box. > > The maintainer of the the port wrote to me: > " The missing files were missing from the distfile extraction, not > the port. > The distfile failed to extract properly. That indicates that either > tar > failed (unlikely) or that you have some kind of filesystem problem. > You > have a problem much more serious than a mere port that failed to > build." > > I have run fsck in single user mode many times, each time coming > back clean. > I ran fsck -f -p, to make sure I wasn't having any problems like > this ( > http://freebsd.rambler.ru/bsdmail/freebsd-current_2003/ > msg04802.html ). > > How can I determine what is going on? Do I have filesystem corruption, > or is something else going on? Try to extract the distfile that you downloaded and see if it is corrupted or incomplete. Ceri --Apple-Mail-4--231640925 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDxRSlme8yCsQvJJ0RAnvPAJsErtK/ZHsjslm6Lz8g+qbyOdglpwCfXJFf d1nuEaeGYBUV+NAkvwSSLPk= =J16p -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-4--231640925-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 14:23:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE71B16A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:23:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mwlucas@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org) Received: from bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org [198.22.63.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB32743D64 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:22:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mwlucas@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org) Received: from bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (mwlucas@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k0BEMknZ051011 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:22:46 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mwlucas@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org) Received: (from mwlucas@localhost) by bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id k0BEMk51051010 for questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:22:46 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mwlucas) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:22:46 -0500 From: "Michael W. Lucas" To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060111142246.GA50712@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> References: <20060109195342.GA35789@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> <736C118F-A6DD-4476-9437-935C43A22771@submonkey.net> <20060110222616.GA45029@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> <20060110234752.GO73071@wantadilla.lemis.com> <43C49EC7.9020003@daleco.biz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43C49EC7.9020003@daleco.biz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Spam-Score: (0) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 Cc: Subject: Re: replacement for Acrobat Professional? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:23:06 -0000 On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:59:35PM -0600, Kevin Kinsey wrote: > It's up to Michael, though, to tell us how well it works, I suppose. No > package in packages-6-current/Latest, so I'm building from src, and > headed for bed before it gets done I imagine. So, for posterity... I'd rate pdftops and flpsed as 95% of the way there for this audience. Some small things don't work, particularly "layered" elements. Some parts of the manuscript I was given were highlighted, for example. In the original the highlighting is transparent, while the pdftops/flpsed combination the highlighting obliterates the underlying text. There are other, very minor variations. That last 5% might not be critical for most people; I would certainly use it for preparing personal documents, or even documents within my company. But OpenOffice's PDF export is far easier for preparing PDFs in general. for this application, pdftops/flpsed is not acceptable. When you dump a PDF directly to a web press and produce a book from it, tiny variations in page placement or layout will result in a really useless print run. But from the various tools people have suggested and that I've tried last night and this morning, it's as good as we have. Thanks for all the help, I'll do this the old-fashioned way. ==ml -- Michael W. Lucas mwlucas@FreeBSD.org, mwlucas@BlackHelicopters.org http://www.BlackHelicopters.org/~mwlucas/ "The cloak of anonymity protects me from the nuisance of caring." -Non Sequitur From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 14:25:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8175116A428 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:25:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from hermes2.cf.ac.uk (hermes2.cf.ac.uk [131.251.0.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E22F43D67 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:25:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrir.insrv.cf.ac.uk ([131.251.50.213]) by hermes2.cf.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Ewgur-0000Cy-CE; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:25:33 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: <20060110125050.A48499@ganymede.hub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-5--231452597" Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ceri Davies Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:25:37 +0000 To: Andrew P. X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.1 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: Cardiff University Sophos AV Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dual Core vs HyperThreading vs Dual CPU X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:25:36 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-5--231452597 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On 10 Jan 2006, at 18:06, Andrew P. wrote: > > By 2010 we'll see 4-core, 8-core and maybe even 16/32 solutions. We got those in 2005: http://www.sun.com/processors/UltraSPARC-T1/ index.xml --Apple-Mail-5--231452597 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDxRVhme8yCsQvJJ0RAnqhAJ9SVYXxdjj/FpC5wKHX5Xj+TXGP6ACeM1+H jml7PgaEoehadkFLLtXjT40= =k+o7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-5--231452597-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 14:26:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8879D16A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:26:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from hermes2.cf.ac.uk (hermes2.cf.ac.uk [131.251.0.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A77CD43D60 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:26:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrir.insrv.cf.ac.uk ([131.251.50.213]) by hermes2.cf.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Ewgw5-0000Kb-Da; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:26:49 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-6--231376109" Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ceri Davies Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:26:53 +0000 To: Ted Mittelstaedt X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.1 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: Cardiff University Sophos AV Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spamcop listed - need help to diagnose why X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:26:55 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-6--231376109 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On 10 Jan 2006, at 05:49, Ted Mittelstaedt wrote: > > So the entire discussion is academic I think. But, that doesen't > make it > a boring discussion. Probably way beyond a lot of the posters here, > though. Given the treatment you seem to be getting, I'd agree. Ceri --Apple-Mail-6--231376109 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDxRWtme8yCsQvJJ0RAqq8AJ9O8uDbRGbOe+uHajIFcSfFpDEm7wCfQanC /kz/SoLTRA2Sjm7Ae+yqUao= =sZeZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-6--231376109-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 14:35:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1364816A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:35:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A31C643D79 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:35:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C666C5E04; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:35:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 86625-07; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:35:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-122-227.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.122.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA8235C56; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:35:34 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43C517B7.704@mac.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:35:35 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wojciech Puchar References: <20060111112654.O11627@chylonia.3miasto.net> In-Reply-To: <20060111112654.O11627@chylonia.3miasto.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: limiting Buf memory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:35:45 -0000 Wojciech Puchar wrote: > on my 1GB machine: > > Mem: 529M Active, 209M Inact, 149M Wired, 38M Cache, 109M Buf, 1772K Free > > while "Cache" is dynamic, Buf is not and never goes down. > > how can i get it down to somehow like 40MB? I think "Buf" corresponds to what NetBSD's top calls "File", it's the amount of memory that is bufferring raw blocks from the disk. Your traditional VM disk cache is the "Cache" entry. See the end of "man top". -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 14:42:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B22CE16A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:42:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dave@raven.za.net) Received: from elektra.opteqint.net (elektra.opteqint.net [209.25.178.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C75D943D69 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:42:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dave@raven.za.net) Received: from [165.165.215.193] (helo=LUCY) by elektra.opteqint.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.52 (FreeBSD)) id 1EwhGq-000N2G-UH for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 06:48:18 -0800 From: "Dave Raven" To: Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:44:27 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 Thread-Index: AcYWvYV1ILuBmDNRQ7esqhZqoySr4Q== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 X-Spam-Score: -101.4 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "elektra.opteqint.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi all, I have two cisco switches, configured to put ports 2-6 on each of them into vlan 100. Then I have port 1 on both set to trunk between the two switches. If I have a device on port 2 on switch1 it can ping a device on port 2 on switch2. [...] Content analysis details: (-101.4 points, 4.5 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -1.4 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP Message-Id: <20060111144252.C75D943D69@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Subject: Bridging a Cisco Trunk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:42:58 -0000 Hi all, I have two cisco switches, configured to put ports 2-6 on each of them into vlan 100. Then I have port 1 on both set to trunk between the two switches. If I have a device on port 2 on switch1 it can ping a device on port 2 on switch2. If I break the link between the two switches, and try to bridge that trunk with a freebsd box, I can't get it right. Does anyone have any specific advice? As I understand it I should just be able to bridge my two interfaces, I have created vlan100 interfaces bound to each though and bridged them as well just to be sure - neither option works... Any advice? Thanks in advance Dave P.s. please copy me as I'm not on the list From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 14:46:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D26D516A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:46:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michal.mertl@i.cz) Received: from vidle.i.cz (vidle.i.cz [193.179.36.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6084C43D48 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:46:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michal.mertl@i.cz) Received: from ns.i.cz (brana.i.cz [193.179.36.134]) by vidle.i.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id A70162E00D; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:46:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost.i.cz [127.0.0.1]) by ns.i.cz (Postfix) with SMTP id 899B5122A02; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:46:13 +0100 (CET) X-AV-Checked: Wed Jan 11 15:46:13 2006 ns.i.cz Received: from genius.i.cz (genius.i.cz [192.168.129.68]) by ns.i.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83143122A01; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:46:13 +0100 (CET) From: Michal Mertl To: Vladimir Dvorak In-Reply-To: <43C4D004.90101@vdsoft.org> References: <43C4D004.90101@vdsoft.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:46:12 +0100 Message-Id: <1136990772.832.32.camel@genius1.i.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: quotas + jail ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:46:16 -0000 Vladimir Dvorak wrote: > Hello, > > I have simple question - is possible to use quotas in jail(8) environment ? Yes, it is, although with some restrictions. You have to enable the disk quotas from the host (have them listed in host's /etc/fstab). To operate the quotas from inside the jail quotas have to be mentioned in jail's /etc/fstab too (when using the file name of quota file it has to be relative to jail's root). Repquota/edquota/quota work inside the jail. You have to keep in mind that disk quotas are in fact a property of a filesystem and are not related to jails at all. So if two jails share a filesystem the disk quotas are shared too. If you have users with the same UID in both the jails they will share the quota. Michal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 14:57:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24B1216A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:57:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jester@panix.com) Received: from mail3.panix.com (mail3.panix.com [166.84.1.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5836443D46 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:57:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jester@panix.com) Received: from panix2.panix.com (panix2.panix.com [166.84.1.2]) by mail3.panix.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66BA013A7AB for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:57:36 -0500 (EST) Received: (from jester@localhost) by panix2.panix.com (8.11.6p3/8.8.8/PanixN1.1) id k0BEvaC26654 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:57:37 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:57:36 -0500 From: Jesse Sheidlower To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060111145736.GA7933@panix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.10i Subject: Fwd: Adjusting volume with GUI app for USB audio? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:57:38 -0000 (Forwarded from freebsd-multimedia, where no one replied. Is that list meant only for hard-core development work, or am I asking badly? I can provide any system details necessary.) ----- Forwarded message from Jesse Sheidlower ----- After assorted work, I've gotten USB audio to work on my computers (FreeBSD 6.0 and 5.4); I select the USB speakers with "sysctl hw.snd.unit="1"" to get the pcm1 device. I find that _some_ graphical volume-control utilities don't work with the USB speakers. These include the GNOME volume-control applet, the volume slider in xmms, and the GNOME volume control application (not the applet). However, some _do_ work, including the volume control in gmplayer and the volume control in Rhythmbox. Furthermore, the commandline mixer(8) works fine--with the speakers plugged in and selected, "mixer" reports on bass, treble, and speaker volume, and I can adjust the volume with "mixer speaker 60" or whatever. However (again), adjusting the output source in those apps that allow it has no effect--in the GNOME volume-control applet, for example, I only have the device choice of "OSS Mixer", and whether I select "Volume", "PCM", "Speaker", or anything else, this just won't control the speaker volume. Any suggestions? It's not the end of the world to use mixer(8) but it's often inconvenient. Thanks. Jesse Sheidlower ----- End forwarded message ----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 15:03:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D384516A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:03:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33311.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33311.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.126]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF21B43D4C for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:03:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 60261 invoked by uid 60001); 11 Jan 2006 15:03:56 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=0lvWhNKplo1JJdik48B358BI53y+bl2xv1iigVtesEGNM2cow9ZonIvzsoVG6TkvNtQ8IN+b8F4chNJSuzoWmi5iYCsBHjupKuGD+r4jizSeK27mV3HqsnFxDsFSGxCNp2ZEvVF9M5Iw3R+ScUyqFW3BMPzPnSIDASzfjSAHhVE= ; Message-ID: <20060111150356.60259.qmail@web33311.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33311.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 07:03:56 PST Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 07:03:56 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: "Andrew P." , "Marc G. Fournier" In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dual Core vs HyperThreading vs Dual CPU X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:03:57 -0000 --- "Andrew P." wrote: > On 1/10/06, Marc G. Fournier > wrote: > > > > I'm going to assume that Dual Core is better > (can't believe that they took > > a step back) ... but, is how does it rate? I > know that HyperThreading is > > definitely != Dual CPU ... but how close does > Dual Core get? > > There is extensive evidence (google for that, > please), that > HT is even slower than a single core in quite a > few applications. > Moreover, the whole HT implementation has been > shown to > be a security risk. In the near future intel is > going to spend $1.9bn > on its new marketing campaign. If you wanna be > part of it, > buy their CPU, half of the money will be in > your nearest billboard. > > Dual-core is a new, and a very smart concept, > which is exactly > equal to a dual-cpu configuration in terms of > performance per > core - plus it provides a huge cut down on > power consumption, > and a theoretically hugely faster > interconnection between the > cores (they are physically many times closer). Thats not entirely true, as its not *exactly* the same. It looks the same to an O/S, but things are wire differently, so there are likely to be some differences. > > By 2010 we'll see 4-core, 8-core and maybe even > 16/32 solutions. Intel has implied that they will have multi-multicore processors (more then 2) a lot sooner than you think. But for now the multicore thing is just marketing hype because most O/Ses don't utilize DP efficiently enough to make the gains worthwhile. You'll likely see more urgency to produce them when OS'es can actually benefit from them. Most people today who use DP system just "assume" they are faster or better without having any real clue if they are or not. DT __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 15:04:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31F6C16A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:04:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from daniel@quanza.net) Received: from babaracus.quanza.net (babaracus.quanza.net [217.115.196.225]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D091443D62 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:04:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from daniel@quanza.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by babaracus.quanza.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0D3F4E2D05 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:04:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from babaracus.quanza.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (babaracus.quanza.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 76541-07 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:04:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.18] (adsl-dc-45df3.mxs.adsl.euronet.nl [83.118.251.243]) by babaracus.quanza.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5473C4E2D04 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:04:34 +0100 (CET) From: Daniel Franke Organization: Quanza Engineering To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:05:00 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1649553.W9G0IU5Z1z"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200601111605.08393.daniel@quanza.net> X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at quanza.net Subject: High availability network filesystem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:04:47 -0000 --nextPart1649553.W9G0IU5Z1z Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Hi, I have a question about using freebsd in high availability environments. I am setting up a cluster of freebsd systems for websites on which downtime= is=20 unacceptable. Everything is redundant and will failover as soon as one of t= he=20 components fails, the only single point of failure is the data storage. What I'm looking for is a network filesystem for which I have 2 servers and= =20 multiple clients. My requirements are that if one of the data servers fails= =20 the clients will not notice this or if they will they'll only notice this f= or=20 a minute and that these servers will synchronize the data between them. I would prefer to keep these 2 servers on FreeBSD. Are there any solutions for my problem? Thanks in advance. Daniel=20 =2D-=20 Quanza Engineering B.V. Elandsstraat 44 Daniel Franke 1016 SG Amsterdam E: daniel@quanza.net M: +31 6 13 660 099 www.quanza.net To verify that this e-mail is actually sent by me or to send me encrypted=20 e-mail you can get my PGP public key at pgp.mit.edu with the keyID:=20 0xFB2E781B --nextPart1649553.W9G0IU5Z1z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDxR6k1RnEvPsueBsRAothAKCbqKISr8wRhKK1g+ZfyfIYlbqOGACeJfh5 u5tESgRhkkiV7AyUoOUMPSU= =Z/Li -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1649553.W9G0IU5Z1z-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 15:15:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E50B116A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:15:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F42043D45 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:15:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2) with ESMTP id k0BFFkiU018553; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:15:46 -0500 (EST) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2/Submit) id k0BFFkAJ018552; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:15:46 -0500 (EST) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200601111515.k0BFFkAJ018552@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: mamaj1979@hotmail.com (mamaj m) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:15:46 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL7] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Forget Root Password X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:15:48 -0000 > > Hi, > > I forget the root password what can i do , so i cant log in to freebsd This is well documented on the FreeBSD web site. Try looking for booting single user as well as setting root password. ////jerry > > Thanks > I > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 15:17:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A3AE16A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:17:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gandalf@messias.qhigh.com) Received: from messias.qhigh.com (3e44a6f1.adsl.enternet.hu [62.68.166.241]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8FA043D4C for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:17:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gandalf@messias.qhigh.com) Received: from [172.16.0.26] (earth.msnet [172.16.0.26]) by messias.qhigh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BBC05C1D for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:23:45 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43C521C7.70005@messias.qhigh.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:18:31 +0100 From: User Gandalf User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051228) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <43C51106.6030607@messias.qhigh.com> <20060111141248.GS40256@mich2.itxmarket.com> In-Reply-To: <20060111141248.GS40256@mich2.itxmarket.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Create more dsp and mixer devices X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:17:52 -0000 >>The gaim instant messenger has support for three sound devices: ESD, >>Arts and using a command. I'm not sure what 'ESD' means. Is it the >>'esound' package? (Enlightment sound daemon.) Somewhere I read that >>FreeBSD can do the same (e.g. sharing one audio device to multiple >>programs). Can you point me to a documentation where I can read more >>about this? >> >> > >http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/sound-setup.html#SOUND-MULTIPLE-SOURCES > > Thank you! I could setup the device so it can be shared between multiple applications. I still have a problem. gaim has ESD, Arts and 'Custom command' interfaces. I only have a shared dsp device so I need a simple command line program that can play mp3, ogg, wav and au files. I looked over the whole audio category here: http://www.freebsd.org/ports/audio.html but I could not find a simple program that can do this. There are separate players for mpeg files, ogg files, wave files etc. But I could not find a program that can play all of them. Do you know a good program for this purpose? Thanks, Les From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 15:36:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F80D16A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:36:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 124D443D45 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:36:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k0BFaeWj007640; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:36:41 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <43C52603.2030803@daleco.biz> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:36:35 -0600 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051026 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Michael W. Lucas" References: <20060109195342.GA35789@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> <736C118F-A6DD-4476-9437-935C43A22771@submonkey.net> <20060110222616.GA45029@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> <20060110234752.GO73071@wantadilla.lemis.com> <43C49EC7.9020003@daleco.biz> <20060111142246.GA50712@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> In-Reply-To: <20060111142246.GA50712@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: replacement for Acrobat Professional? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:36:49 -0000 Michael W. Lucas wrote: >On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:59:35PM -0600, Kevin Kinsey wrote: > > >>It's up to Michael, though, to tell us how well it works, I suppose. No >>package in packages-6-current/Latest, so I'm building from src, and >>headed for bed before it gets done I imagine. >> >> > >So, for posterity... > >I'd rate pdftops and flpsed as 95% of the way there for this audience. >Some small things don't work, particularly "layered" elements. Some >parts of the manuscript I was given were highlighted, for example. In >the original the highlighting is transparent, while the pdftops/flpsed >combination the highlighting obliterates the underlying text. There >are other, very minor variations. > >That last 5% might not be critical for most people; I would certainly >use it for preparing personal documents, or even documents within my >company. But OpenOffice's PDF export is far easier for preparing PDFs >in general. > >for this application, pdftops/flpsed is not acceptable. When you dump >a PDF directly to a web press and produce a book from it, tiny >variations in page placement or layout will result in a really useless >print run. But from the various tools people have suggested and that >I've tried last night and this morning, it's as good as we have. > > It certainly doesn't seem as "full-featured" as some commercial products (ref. subject line), and my short testing concurs with yours. I had some trouble with "image handling" --- I imagine that this is similar to the "layered elements" you mention; I have no great wealth of personal knowledge of the PDF format, though. The author's homepage states that flpsed is still alpha-quality software. I'd say it looks rather promising for the future, perhaps; we can hope so, and do what we can to support it. KDK -- "God doesn't play dice." --- Albert Einstein From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 15:36:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE0F716A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:36:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.7]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74EB143D45 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:36:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 2715 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2006 15:36:58 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 11 Jan 2006 15:36:57 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 0D86628423; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:36:56 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060110125050.A48499@ganymede.hub.org> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 11 Jan 2006 10:36:56 -0500 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <4464oq93on.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 22 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Dual Core vs HyperThreading vs Dual CPU X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:36:58 -0000 Ceri Davies writes: > On 10 Jan 2006, at 18:06, Andrew P. wrote: > > > > By 2010 we'll see 4-core, 8-core and maybe even 16/32 solutions. > > We got those in 2005: http://www.sun.com/processors/UltraSPARC-T1/index.xml That's a little different than what Andrew was describing as "multi-core," though. His definition was that it was exactly the same as having that many separate CPUs. Sun's definition in the new UltraSPARC chips is separate ALUs but other resources are not duplicated. Perhaps most notably, there is only one floating point unit shared between all of the cores on the chip. Personally, I don't think there's a strong enough argument for one definition to be "right" and the other "wrong," so you just have to be aware which one you're using. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 15:55:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE16A16A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:55:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from efinleywork@efinley.com) Received: from postmaster.etv.net (postmaster.etv.net [208.14.190.176]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5032443D45 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:55:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from efinleywork@efinley.com) Received: from work.efinley.com ([205.161.203.55] helo=elliotdevelop) by postmaster.etv.net with smtp (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1EwiJf-0007xg-GM for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 08:55:15 -0700 Message-ID: <03a301c616c7$69f896c0$37cba1cd@emerytelcom.com> From: "Elliot Finley" To: Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 08:55:15 -0700 Organization: Emery Telcom MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1506 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Subject: cvsup6.us.freebsd.org worthless? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Elliot Finley List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:55:22 -0000 Connected to cvsup6.us.freebsd.org Server message: Collection "ports-all" release "cvs" is not available here also, the same thing with src-all. Is this temporary or permanent? TIA Elliot From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 16:03:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFE0516A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:03:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5663243D45 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:03:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k0BG3OIM007796; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:03:24 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <43C52C46.3070604@daleco.biz> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:03:18 -0600 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051026 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: User Gandalf References: <43C51106.6030607@messias.qhigh.com> <20060111141248.GS40256@mich2.itxmarket.com> <43C521C7.70005@messias.qhigh.com> In-Reply-To: <43C521C7.70005@messias.qhigh.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Create more dsp and mixer devices X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:03:26 -0000 User Gandalf wrote: > > Thank you! I could setup the device so it can be shared between > multiple applications. I still have a problem. gaim has ESD, Arts > and 'Custom command' interfaces. I only have a shared dsp device > so I need a simple command line program that can play mp3, ogg, > wav and au files. I looked over the whole audio category here: > > > http://www.freebsd.org/ports/audio.html > > but I could not find a simple program that can do this. There are > separate > players for mpeg files, ogg files, wave files etc. But I could not find a > program that can play all of them. Do you know a good program for this > purpose? > > Thanks, > > Les > /usr/ports/multimedia/mplayer I have no ogg nor au files, but mplayer works for *wav and *mp3 from the CLI here.... As Michael Lucas was just saying, we have, um, **lots** of programs. KDK -- People don't usually make the same mistake twice -- they make it three times, four time, five times... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 16:29:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E133816A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:29:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imran@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk) Received: from darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk (darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk [202.59.74.139]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7353743D45 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:29:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imran@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk) Received: from darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k0BGRu3H092201 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:27:56 +0500 (PKT) (envelope-from imran@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk) Received: (from imran@localhost) by darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id k0BGRsQK092200 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:27:54 +0500 (PKT) (envelope-from imran) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:27:54 +0500 (PKT) From: Imran Imtiaz Message-Id: <200601111627.k0BGRsQK092200@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: is it an attack? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:29:04 -0000 I got the following messages is it really an attack attempt Jan 10 23:23:22 darkstar sshd[58484]: reverse mapping checking getaddrinfo for 58.25-183.uio.satnet.net failed - POSSIBLE BREAKIN ATTEMPT! Jan 10 23:23:26 darkstar sshd[58486]: reverse mapping checking getaddrinfo for 58.25-183.uio.satnet.net failed - POSSIBLE BREAKIN ATTEMPT! Jan 10 23:23:30 darkstar sshd[58488]: reverse mapping checking getaddrinfo for 58.25-183.uio.satnet.net failed - POSSIBLE BREAKIN ATTEMPT! Jan 10 23:23:33 darkstar sshd[58497]: reverse mapping checking getaddrinfo for 58.25-183.uio.satnet.net failed - POSSIBLE BREAKIN ATTEMPT! Jan 10 23:23:37 darkstar sshd[58499]: reverse mapping checking getaddrinfo for 58.25-183.uio.satnet.net failed - POSSIBLE BREAKIN ATTEMPT! Jan 10 23:23:40 darkstar sshd[58501]: reverse mapping checking getaddrinfo for 58.25-183.uio.satnet.net failed - POSSIBLE BREAKIN ATTEMPT! Jan 10 23:23:44 darkstar sshd[58503]: reverse mapping checking getaddrinfo for 58.25-183.uio.satnet.net failed - POSSIBLE BREAKIN ATTEMPT! Jan 10 23:23:47 darkstar sshd[58505]: reverse mapping checking getaddrinfo for 58.25-183.uio.satnet.net failed - POSSIBLE BREAKIN ATTEMPT! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 16:36:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAB3C16A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:36:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F33BC43D46 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:36:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 593A862C8D5; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:36:15 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12408-09; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:36:15 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-222-82-85.eastlink.ca [24.222.82.85]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9F8162C8D3; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:36:14 -0400 (AST) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 798FD3CA0A; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:36:13 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78C9E370F0; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:36:13 -0400 (AST) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:36:13 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Michal Mertl In-Reply-To: <1136990772.832.32.camel@genius1.i.cz> Message-ID: <20060111123530.C1006@ganymede.hub.org> References: <43C4D004.90101@vdsoft.org> <1136990772.832.32.camel@genius1.i.cz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Vladimir Dvorak Subject: Re: quotas + jail ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:36:16 -0000 On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Michal Mertl wrote: > Vladimir Dvorak wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I have simple question - is possible to use quotas in jail(8) environment ? > > Yes, it is, although with some restrictions. > > You have to enable the disk quotas from the host (have them listed in > host's /etc/fstab). > > To operate the quotas from inside the jail quotas have to be mentioned > in jail's /etc/fstab too (when using the file name of quota file it has > to be relative to jail's root). Repquota/edquota/quota work inside the > jail. > > You have to keep in mind that disk quotas are in fact a property of a > filesystem and are not related to jails at all. So if two jails share a > filesystem the disk quotas are shared too. If you have users with the > same UID in both the jails they will share the quota. How hard would it be to extend quotas so that its not just uid/gid based, but directory? ie. everything under /vm/jail1 falls under this quota, regardless of uid/gid? ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 16:46:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1FD916A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:46:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subscriber@insignia.com) Received: from highland.isltd.insignia.com (highland.isltd.insignia.com [195.74.141.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2A6F43D5E for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:46:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from subscriber@insignia.com) Received: from inchgower.internal.local (inchgower-e0.isltd.insignia.com [195.74.141.61]) by highland.isltd.insignia.com (8.12.6p3/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k0BGkiAl099616 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:46:44 GMT (envelope-from subscriber@insignia.com) Received: from exchange-uk.internal.local (exchange-uk [172.16.64.9]) by inchgower.internal.local (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k0BGkiKY001898 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:46:44 GMT (envelope-from subscriber@insignia.com) Received: from dylan.internal.local ([172.16.64.69]) by exchange-uk.internal.local with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13) id XFAHQH24; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:46:44 -0000 From: Jim Hatfield To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:46:44 +0000 Organization: Insignia Solutions Message-ID: <0bbas19t8e136ut633dfouketk4fevlo7i@4ax.com> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 3.1/32.783 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.53 on 195.74.141.1 Subject: amd doesn't like NIS maps from a Windows NIS server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:46:51 -0000 We've been using NIS-based automounter maps for ages, using a Solaris NIS server. Some of our machines use autofs type maps, and some use amd, notably the FreeBSD boxes. As part of a move to single sign-on I've implemented a NIS server using Microsoft's Services for Unix installed on an Active Directory domain controller, and (painfully) created the automounting maps. The autofs-using machines are OK, but amd just doesn't want to play. It seems to be OK about the top-level "master" map, but not the ones referenced by that. As an experiment I've mixed file-based and NIS maps. My rc.conf contains: >amd_enable=3D"YES" >amd_map_program=3D"cat /usr/local/etc/amd.master" >amd_flags=3D"-x all -D info -l syslog:local7" /usr/local/etc/amd.master contains: >/home amd.home >/mp /usr/local/etc/amd.mp >/net /usr/local/etc/amd.net >/users /usr/local/etc/amd.users When the machine starts I get: >Jan 11 11:52:30 speyburn amd[408]: /mp: disabling nfs congestion window >Jan 11 11:52:30 speyburn amd[410]: /users: disabling nfs congestion = window >Jan 11 11:52:30 speyburn amd[411]: /net: disabling nfs congestion window >Jan 11 11:52:30 speyburn amd[409]: /home: disabling nfs congestion = window >Jan 11 11:52:30 speyburn amd[407]: first time load of map = /usr/local/etc/amd.mp >succeeded >Jan 11 11:52:30 speyburn amd[407]: /usr/local/etc/amd.mp mounted fstype = toplvl o >n /mp >Jan 11 11:52:30 speyburn amd[407]: first time load of map = /usr/local/etc/amd.use >rs succeeded >Jan 11 11:52:30 speyburn amd[407]: /usr/local/etc/amd.users mounted = fstype toplv >l on /users >Jan 11 11:52:30 speyburn amd[407]: first time load of map = /usr/local/etc/amd.net > succeeded >Jan 11 11:52:30 speyburn amd[407]: /usr/local/etc/amd.net mounted fstype= toplvl >on /net >Jan 11 11:52:30 speyburn amd[407]: No source data for map amd.home >Jan 11 11:52:30 speyburn amd[407]: amd.home mounted fstype toplvl on = /home So the file-based ones work fine, but the single NIS map, amd.home, does not. And yet if I do a "ypcat -k amd.home" I get exactly the same as when I was talking to the Solaris NIS server - but it just doesn't work. If I replace it with a file with the same contents, it works fine. Aaargh! I've looked at the source of amd but my C experience is 15 years old now and I'm struggling a bit! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 16:59:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D7A816A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:59:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from hermes2.cf.ac.uk (hermes2.cf.ac.uk [131.251.0.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE3A943D45 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:59:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrir.insrv.cf.ac.uk ([131.251.50.213]) by hermes2.cf.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EwjJM-0000vi-H8; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:59:00 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20060111123530.C1006@ganymede.hub.org> References: <43C4D004.90101@vdsoft.org> <1136990772.832.32.camel@genius1.i.cz> <20060111123530.C1006@ganymede.hub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-13--222245299" Message-Id: <434AC01B-0C6E-4019-9644-1E9283098B30@submonkey.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ceri Davies Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:59:04 +0000 To: Marc G. Fournier X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.1 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: Cardiff University Sophos AV Cc: Vladimir Dvorak , Michal Mertl , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: quotas + jail ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:59:05 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-13--222245299 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On 11 Jan 2006, at 16:36, Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Michal Mertl wrote: > >> Vladimir Dvorak wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> I have simple question - is possible to use quotas in jail(8) >>> environment ? >> >> Yes, it is, although with some restrictions. >> >> You have to enable the disk quotas from the host (have them listed in >> host's /etc/fstab). >> >> To operate the quotas from inside the jail quotas have to be >> mentioned >> in jail's /etc/fstab too (when using the file name of quota file >> it has >> to be relative to jail's root). Repquota/edquota/quota work inside >> the >> jail. >> >> You have to keep in mind that disk quotas are in fact a property of a >> filesystem and are not related to jails at all. So if two jails >> share a >> filesystem the disk quotas are shared too. If you have users with the >> same UID in both the jails they will share the quota. > > How hard would it be to extend quotas so that its not just uid/gid > based, but directory? ie. everything under /vm/jail1 falls under > this quota, regardless of uid/gid? Given the lack of a unique name for files in UFS, quite difficult, I'd presume. Ceri --Apple-Mail-13--222245299 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDxTlYme8yCsQvJJ0RAhNDAKCvR2WljpCn+871w1A8azwBxLP6VACfetQ5 MzSFRsbWUHuTBuzU6r1GiMs= =sTZN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-13--222245299-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 17:23:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12FE416A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:23:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from barry.byrne@wbtsystems.com) Received: from mail.wbtsystems.com (onyx.dublin.wbtsystems.com [193.120.231.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76D6943D77 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:23:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from barry.byrne@wbtsystems.com) Received: from SUNYA (sunya.wbt.wbtsystems.com [10.12.1.105]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.wbtsystems.com (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k0BHN2ID035995 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:23:02 GMT From: "Barry Byrne" To: "'freebsd'" Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:23:02 -0000 Message-ID: <00aa01c616d3$ad198840$69010c0a@dublin.wbtsystems.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 In-Reply-To: <000001c6169b$ad19d0d0$69010c0a@dublin.wbtsystems.com> thread-index: AcYWm6yn4bxMgiw4S/yUpLqFATvUqQAN9Sbw X-WBT-Authenticated-User: bb X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 Subject: RE: Mysql-5.018 fails to build from the ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:23:18 -0000 Sorry to answer my own question, but seems like the Makefile in the ports was fixed for builds on 4.x about 10 hours ago. Did another cvsup and all appears OK now. - barry > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Barry Byrne > Sent: 11 January 2006 10:42 > To: 'freebsd' > Subject: Mysql-5.018 fails to build from the ports > > Hi: > > I've got a freebsd 4.11-release box which is kept up to date using > portupgrade. Haven't had any problem until recently - but now > attempting to > build mysql 5.0.18 fails. It worked as far as .16, but both > .17 and .18 have > failed. I get the following error: > > ------------------- > libtool15: link: cannot find the library `../zlib/libz.la' or > unhandled > argument `../zlib/libz.la' > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in > /usr/ports/databases/mysql50-client/work/mysql-5.0.18/libmysql_r. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql50-client/work/mysql-5.0.18. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql50-client/work/mysql-5.0.18. > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/databases/mysql50-client. > ------------------- > > The other thing I notice is early on in the configure script, > I get the > following notice about zlib not being found - though I > thought zlib was > bundled system-wide. > > ------------------- > checking for zlib compression library... system-wide zlib not > found, using > one bundled with MySQL > ------------------- > > Any help in solving this would be appreciated. > > Thanks, > > Barry > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 17:30:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1433016A420 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:30:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from crispy.beef@ntlworld.com) Received: from mta08-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (mta08-winn.ispmail.ntl.com [81.103.221.48]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C21C743D6A for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:30:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from crispy.beef@ntlworld.com) Received: from aamta09-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mta08-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20060111173011.SKI17804.mta08-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamta09-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:30:11 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.2] (really [82.12.81.129]) by aamta09-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20060111173011.ZCMV10196.aamta09-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@[192.168.0.2]> for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:30:11 +0000 Message-ID: <43C540A1.7060805@ntlworld.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:30:09 +0000 From: Crispy Beef User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: 4.6-RELEASE to 6.0-RELEASE... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:30:21 -0000 Hi, I have a production server running 4.6-RELEASE and I would like to bring it upto date and get 6.0-RELEASE on there. I have a rough idea of what needs to be done to accomplish this from reading various docs but it would be nice to see how smoothly it has gone for any others. From what I can tell I first need to upgrade to a minimum of 5.3-RELEASE and then onto 6.0, so I guess doing a cvsup to the 5.3-RELEASE and then doing buildworld et all? Then from there to same to get to 6.0? My main concern is the filesystem, it's been updated since 4.x? Will this mess things up? The machine is remote so I really need to make sure this works without making it inaccessible. I have a box here to trial run the process on so I get the steps correct first time, but thought I'd ask here too. :-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 17:36:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B80C16A423 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:36:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mchartzell@getdts.com) Received: from smtp109.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp109.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.229.96]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4C26043D6D for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:36:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mchartzell@getdts.com) Received: (qmail 60160 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2006 17:36:40 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (mchartzell@sbcglobal.net@67.163.122.242 with plain) by smtp109.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Jan 2006 17:36:40 -0000 Message-ID: <43C5421F.1090105@getdts.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:36:31 -0600 From: Matt Hartzell User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Marc G. Fournier" References: <20060111002632.T1006@ganymede.hub.org> In-Reply-To: <20060111002632.T1006@ganymede.hub.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ciss0: *** Parity/consistency initialization ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mchartzell@getdts.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:36:57 -0000 This perfectly normal. Why are you using RAID 1+0 and not RAID 5? Just curious. Marc G. Fournier wrote: > > I'm in the process of bringing up a new HP DL360 server ... I > configured it as a RAID1+0, and everything is looking good ... just > noticed this on the console: > > ciss0: *** Parity/consistency initialization complete, logical drive 0 > ciss0: logical drive 0 () completed consistency initialisation > > the way I'm reading it, this doesn't look like something to panic > about, but just want to make sure while I still have it in the shop ... > > Thanks ... > > ---- > Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services > (http://www.hub.org) > Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: > 7615664 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-proliant > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-proliant-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 17:37:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B834116A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:37:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: from lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (mail.bathnetworks.com [84.92.24.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3640043D7D for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:37:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: (qmail 4659 invoked by uid 510); 11 Jan 2006 17:40:28 +0000 Received: from 84.92.24.252 by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (envelope-from , uid 508) with qmail-scanner-1.24-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.87/1146. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.24-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-3.8/5.0):. Processed in 2.066245 secs); 11 Jan 2006 17:40:28 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.8 required=5.0 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: bsd@bathnetworks.com via lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.24-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-3.8/5.0):. Processed in 2.066245 secs Process 4652) Received: from mail.bathnetworks.com (HELO ?84.92.24.252?) (bsd@bathnetworks.com@84.92.24.252) by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk with SMTP; 11 Jan 2006 17:40:25 +0000 From: Robert Slade To: user In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1137001225.4076.16.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:40:25 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Wojciech Puchar , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: how should I (best practice) set up permissions for rsync ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:37:44 -0000 On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 03:47, user wrote: > On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Wojciech Puchar wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I want to rsync /usr/home from one machine to another, for purposes of > > > backup. > > > > > > > i do: > > > > rsync -e "rsh" -avzrlHpogDtS --delete --delete-excluded --force > > \ --exclude-from=../$1-exclude root@$1:/ . > > > > where $1 is server name > > > Yeah ... I know how to do that ... I wasn't asking how to rsync it, I was > asking how I could: > > a) keep remote root logins _disabled_ > > and > > b) keep default freebsd permissions on the /usr/home directory > > and still do the rsync ... in your example, you are remotely logging in as > root, which I want to avoid. > > Any suggestions ? If you don't want to log on as root, then you can run a rsync as each user as say a user cron job. Just a thought Rob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 17:48:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C2A616A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:48:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michal.mertl@i.cz) Received: from vidle.i.cz (vidle.i.cz [193.179.36.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B612B43D45 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:48:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from michal.mertl@i.cz) Received: from ns.i.cz (brana.i.cz [193.179.36.134]) by vidle.i.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 161F12E006; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:48:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost.i.cz [127.0.0.1]) by ns.i.cz (Postfix) with SMTP id EDEED122A04; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:48:03 +0100 (CET) X-AV-Checked: Wed Jan 11 18:48:03 2006 ns.i.cz Received: from genius.i.cz (genius.i.cz [192.168.129.68]) by ns.i.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7A73122A03; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:48:03 +0100 (CET) From: Michal Mertl To: "Marc G. Fournier" In-Reply-To: <20060111123530.C1006@ganymede.hub.org> References: <43C4D004.90101@vdsoft.org> <1136990772.832.32.camel@genius1.i.cz> <20060111123530.C1006@ganymede.hub.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:48:02 +0100 Message-Id: <1137001682.832.45.camel@genius1.i.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Vladimir Dvorak Subject: Re: quotas + jail ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:48:06 -0000 Marc G. Fournier wrote: > On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Michal Mertl wrote: > > > Vladimir Dvorak wrote: > >> Hello, > >> > >> I have simple question - is possible to use quotas in jail(8) environment ? > > > > Yes, it is, although with some restrictions. > > > > You have to enable the disk quotas from the host (have them listed in > > host's /etc/fstab). > > > > To operate the quotas from inside the jail quotas have to be mentioned > > in jail's /etc/fstab too (when using the file name of quota file it has > > to be relative to jail's root). Repquota/edquota/quota work inside the > > jail. > > > > You have to keep in mind that disk quotas are in fact a property of a > > filesystem and are not related to jails at all. So if two jails share a > > filesystem the disk quotas are shared too. If you have users with the > > same UID in both the jails they will share the quota. > > How hard would it be to extend quotas so that its not just uid/gid based, > but directory? ie. everything under /vm/jail1 falls under this quota, > regardless of uid/gid? I don't think I understand your goal. Do you want some grand limit for whole jail's disk usage or have separated quotas for jails on the same partition? Neither can be done at the moment with disk quotas. The needed changes to support either will be quite extensive I believe. I recommend using separate partition for each jail. This will allow you to achieve both goals at the same time. If you have lot of jails and the number of partitions is the problem you can use gpt(8) or vnode based md(4) (see mdconfig(8)). With md(4) you can also use sparse backing files and that way have more space than you have on physical drives. Beware of overcommit though - I wouldn't be surprised if the system crashed when the disk is full and the md(4) file system is supposed to have free space in it. Michal From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 17:49:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F414F16A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:49:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9358243D62 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:48:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k0BHlbEc078925; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:48:07 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <43C544B3.2040101@daleco.biz> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:47:31 -0600 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051026 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Imran Imtiaz References: <200601111627.k0BGRsQK092200@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk> In-Reply-To: <200601111627.k0BGRsQK092200@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: is it an attack? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:49:02 -0000 Imran Imtiaz wrote: >I got the following messages is it really an attack attempt > >Jan 10 23:23:22 darkstar sshd[58484]: reverse mapping checking getaddrinfo >for 58.25-183.uio.satnet.net failed - POSSIBLE BREAKIN ATTEMPT! > > Might as well treat it like one. If you're in Pakistan, who in Ecuador should be ssh'ing to your computer? Of course, that's the problem ... maybe they aren't really in Ecuador.... Although /etc/hosts.allow recommends against it, I find it fairly useful to place tcpwrappers on sshd. At the very least, I can block overseas connections to a large extent. If I want an even more secure login, I restrict ssh logins to a specific host and "daisy chain" through a less-restrictively configured machine. You should also be tough with configuration (/etc/ssh/sshd_config) and consider using key-based authentication instead of passwords/ keyboard-interactive. HTH, Kevin Kinsey -- The two things that can get you into trouble quicker than anything else are fast women and slow horses. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 17:49:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E54716A41F; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:49:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CB0743D79; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:49:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39D6F62C8E3; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:49:29 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 28110-02; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:49:29 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-222-82-85.eastlink.ca [24.222.82.85]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD8F162C8E2; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:49:28 -0400 (AST) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D41AD3BD48; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:49:27 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A0D33A253; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:49:27 -0400 (AST) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:49:27 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Matt Hartzell In-Reply-To: <43C5421F.1090105@getdts.com> Message-ID: <20060111134550.P1006@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20060111002632.T1006@ganymede.hub.org> <43C5421F.1090105@getdts.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org Cc: freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ciss0: *** Parity/consistency initialization ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:49:38 -0000 On Wed, 11 Jan 2006, Matt Hartzell wrote: > This perfectly normal. Why are you using RAID 1+0 and not RAID 5? Just > curious. Performance and redundancy ... I've been using 3 drive 1U boxes for awhile now, and have not been happy with RAID5 ... my latest box had one drive fail, and until I reformated the box without the failed drive (RAID1), I had endless troubles with the server's stability. It was the first time I had taht sort of problem with RAID5, but one of the many reasons I went with the HP DL360 G4P was that it came with 4xSAS drives instead of 3xSCSI, so that I could move away from RAID5 ... the remote console and power weighed heavily too (gotta love installing FreeBSD without a monitor/keyboard attached, straight from configuring the RAID controller, straight through to initial login, all at the hardware level) ... > > Marc G. Fournier wrote: > >> >> I'm in the process of bringing up a new HP DL360 server ... I configured it >> as a RAID1+0, and everything is looking good ... just noticed this on the >> console: >> >> ciss0: *** Parity/consistency initialization complete, logical drive 0 >> ciss0: logical drive 0 () completed consistency initialisation >> >> the way I'm reading it, this doesn't look like something to panic about, >> but just want to make sure while I still have it in the shop ... >> >> Thanks ... >> >> ---- >> Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) >> Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-proliant@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-proliant >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-proliant-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 17:50:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E9E016A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:50:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27F3F43D45 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:50:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k0BHo8JQ081322; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:50:08 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <43C5454A.5000404@daleco.biz> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:50:02 -0600 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051026 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Elliot Finley References: <03a301c616c7$69f896c0$37cba1cd@emerytelcom.com> In-Reply-To: <03a301c616c7$69f896c0$37cba1cd@emerytelcom.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvsup6.us.freebsd.org worthless? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:50:52 -0000 Elliot Finley wrote: >Connected to cvsup6.us.freebsd.org >Server message: Collection "ports-all" release "cvs" is not available here > > >also, the same thing with src-all. Is this temporary or permanent? > >TIA > >Elliot > > If you would show your supfile ... I'm guessing it's a config issue, but not enough info here to say positively. KDK -- A woman was in love with fourteen soldiers, it was clearly platoonic. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 17:57:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FAA216A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:57:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E48543D45 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:57:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k0BHviJJ086265; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:57:45 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <43C54713.6000404@daleco.biz> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:57:39 -0600 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051026 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Crispy Beef References: <43C540A1.7060805@ntlworld.com> In-Reply-To: <43C540A1.7060805@ntlworld.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.6-RELEASE to 6.0-RELEASE... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:57:46 -0000 Crispy Beef wrote: > Hi, > > I have a production server running 4.6-RELEASE and I > would like to bring it upto date and get 6.0-RELEASE on there. > I have a rough idea of what needs to be done to accomplish > this from reading various docs but it would be nice to see > how smoothly it has gone for any others. > > From what I can tell I first need to upgrade to a minimum of > 5.3-RELEASE and then onto 6.0, so I guess doing a cvsup to > the 5.3-RELEASE and then doing buildworld et all? Then > from there to same to get to 6.0? > > My main concern is the filesystem, it's been updated since 4.x? > Will this mess things up? > > The machine is remote so I really need to make sure this works > without making it inaccessible. I have a box here to trial run the > process on so I get the steps correct first time, but thought I'd ask > here too. :-) I'd suggest going to 4.10/11 first, then do a very careful migration to 5.X (have you read the Migration Guide written by Bruce Mah??). 5-->6 is easy. There are potential pitfalls to 4->5, IIRC. As for the filesystems, since you'll be doing an inplace upgrade, it won't be an issue. FreeBSD 5/6 still "Just Works" with ufs instead of ufs2 --- you'll just miss whatever benefits you might receive from the newer filesystem. If you want ufs2, you'll have to reformat your disk(s), so why not just backup/reinstall in that case? But then again, since it's remote, it'd be kinda tough to reinstall unless you've another box and serial console capability. So, nothing else to do. Easy decision, then? Heh ... ;-) HTH, Kevin Kinsey -- We all know that no one understands anything that isn't funny. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 18:17:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2967716A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:17:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gandalf@messias.qhigh.com) Received: from messias.qhigh.com (3e44a6f1.adsl.enternet.hu [62.68.166.241]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F69243D45 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:17:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gandalf@messias.qhigh.com) Received: from [172.16.0.26] (earth.msnet [172.16.0.26]) by messias.qhigh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B7775C1E for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:23:54 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43C54BFE.8060100@messias.qhigh.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 19:18:38 +0100 From: User Gandalf User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051228) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <43C51106.6030607@messias.qhigh.com> <20060111141248.GS40256@mich2.itxmarket.com> <43C521C7.70005@messias.qhigh.com> <43C52C46.3070604@daleco.biz> In-Reply-To: <43C52C46.3070604@daleco.biz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Create more dsp and mixer devices X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:17:59 -0000 > > /usr/ports/multimedia/mplayer > > I have no ogg nor au files, but mplayer works for *wav and *mp3 from > the CLI here.... > As Michael Lucas was just saying, we have, um, **lots** of programs. > > KDK > I did not know that mplayer has cli. But I tried to install that days ago. I always get the same result since two days: earth# pkg_add -r mplayer Error: FTP Unable to get ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/Latest/mplayer.tbz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) pkg_add: unable to fetch 'ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/Latest/mplayer.tbz' by URL earth# Probably this is my fault again. I know that it is in the 'All' packages directory, but pkg_add uses 'Latest' and mplayer is not available there. I know I could install mplayer from the ports but it would be too slow on this machine. Les From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 18:28:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 212BF16A420 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:28:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@alastria.net) Received: from nebula.thdo.uk.alastria.net (nebula.thdo.uk.alastria.net [212.13.198.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63DEC43D46 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:28:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from peter@alastria.net) Received: from [192.168.0.126] (81-179-86-254.dsl.pipex.com [81.179.86.254]) (authenticated bits=0) by nebula.thdo.uk.alastria.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k0BISk3D046768 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:28:48 GMT (envelope-from peter@alastria.net) Message-ID: <43C54E5D.8060608@alastria.net> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:28:45 +0000 From: Peter Wood Organization: Alastria Networks User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dave Raven References: <20060111144252.C75D943D69@mx1.FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20060111144252.C75D943D69@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Flag: NO X-Virus-Status: No X-Spam-Score: 0.137 () RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL X-Spam-Ultra-Flag: NO X-Spam-Low-Flag: NO X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-High-Flag: NO X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.51 on 212.13.198.8 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bridging a Cisco Trunk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:28:55 -0000 Dave, > I have two cisco switches, configured to put ports 2-6 on each of > them into vlan 100. Then I have port 1 on both set to trunk between the two > switches. If I have a device on port 2 on switch1 it can ping a device on > port 2 on switch2. I do this quite often, and it works very well on 6.0 for me. You haven't mentioned what version your using, but I will assume you have if_bridge. If you don't and you're gonna use this machine alot for bridging, I'd recommend moving to 6.0. So presumably, you have two interfaces, plugged into the trunk port on each cisco. For arguements sake, we'll say you have an fxp0 and fxp1. So first step is you need to make sure these two interfaces are "up", very important, if they arn't, then it wont work. It's easy to forget if you arn't assigning IP's to them. Remove "polling" if you don't have it compiled into the kernel, but again if you're gonna be bridging packets alot, get it compiled in. It helps.... alot. ifconfig_fxp0="up polling" ifconfig_fxp1="up polling" Now create the vlans (and the bridge for later on). cloned_interfaces="vlan0 vlan1 bridge0" ifconfig_vlan0="vlan 100 vlandev fxp0 up" ifconfig_vlan1="vlan 100 vlandev fxp1 up" In the above please note the "up"s, if they arn't up then it wont bridge. Now setup the bridge, again noticing the "up". ifconfig_bridge0="addm vlan0 addm vlan1 up" It should now be working, watch the kernel console and the cisco's logs to see if there are any mismatches or bridging loops. It also seems that you have to put the "up" at the end of these commands, it took an hour of debugging last night after I had put the up at the start of the ifconfig_vlan lines. Give it a go, send a reply to both me and the list if you are still stuck, Pete. -- Peter Wood :: From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 18:28:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14F9216A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:28:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Received: from wmptl.net (fw1.wmptl.com [216.8.159.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8891343D45 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:28:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Received: from [10.0.0.104] (r3140ca.wmptl.net [10.0.0.104]) by wmptl.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k0BIStsG092028; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:28:55 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Message-ID: <43C54E67.9070409@wmptl.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:28:55 -0500 From: Nathan Vidican User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: User Gandalf References: <43C51106.6030607@messias.qhigh.com> <20060111141248.GS40256@mich2.itxmarket.com> <43C521C7.70005@messias.qhigh.com> <43C52C46.3070604@daleco.biz> <43C54BFE.8060100@messias.qhigh.com> In-Reply-To: <43C54BFE.8060100@messias.qhigh.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.711 () J_CHICKENPOX_73,RATWR10_MESSID X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.44 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Create more dsp and mixer devices X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:28:58 -0000 User Gandalf wrote: > >> >> /usr/ports/multimedia/mplayer >> >> I have no ogg nor au files, but mplayer works for *wav and *mp3 from >> the CLI here.... As Michael Lucas was just saying, we have, um, >> **lots** of programs. >> >> KDK >> > I did not know that mplayer has cli. But I tried to install that days > ago. I always get the same result since two days: > > earth# pkg_add -r mplayer > Error: FTP Unable to get > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/Latest/mplayer.tbz: > File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) > pkg_add: unable to fetch > 'ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/Latest/mplayer.tbz' > by URL > earth# > > Probably this is my fault again. I know that it is in the 'All' packages > directory, but pkg_add uses 'Latest' and mplayer is not available there. > I know I could install mplayer from the ports but it would be too slow > on this machine. > > Les > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Manually ftp in the .tbz file from ftp.freebsd.org or one of the mirror sites, and do a 'pkg_add mplayer.tbz'. That way you can download it, put on floppy, cd, whatever you have to to get to the machine in question - everything done in 'sysinstall' can be done outside of it too ;) -- Nathan Vidican nvidican@wmptl.com Windsor Match Plate & Tool Ltd. http://www.wmptl.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 18:31:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFB4E16A42B for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:31:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsdlists@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01B2343D45 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:31:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsdlists@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i20so196858wra for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:31:19 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NUcWBWlV/f+XVOvsoUIY0s8OnA3JqVJ42JZHnqoT1YAV7I0TAAJVuzUvg9TdVgM+gLla74/vYHJD9eHBHgx4MHuAG1j50rNw3RoZ8o4cWTDWypEBvh9XmCIKRN4mS3pckJl8LdshiI4mhebTpJyzQahkC55PVZXUwPs/bBKtbb0= Received: by 10.65.15.15 with SMTP id s15mr380911qbi; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:31:19 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.188.5 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:31:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54db43990601111031w2d77cf79xc3f0f9417d87d9e8@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:31:19 -0500 From: Bob Johnson To: Kevin Kinsey In-Reply-To: <43C5454A.5000404@daleco.biz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <03a301c616c7$69f896c0$37cba1cd@emerytelcom.com> <43C5454A.5000404@daleco.biz> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvsup6.us.freebsd.org worthless? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:31:20 -0000 On 1/11/06, Kevin Kinsey wrote: > Elliot Finley wrote: > > >Connected to cvsup6.us.freebsd.org > >Server message: Collection "ports-all" release "cvs" is not available he= re > > > > > >also, the same thing with src-all. Is this temporary or permanent? > > [...] > > If you would show your supfile ... I'm guessing it's a config issue, > but not enough info here to say positively. [...] cvsup6 has been refusing connections for several days. If it is accepting them now, that's an improvement. Perhaps they are bringing it back up and don't have everything loaded yet. - Bob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 18:34:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59B9C16A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:34:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gandalf@messias.qhigh.com) Received: from messias.qhigh.com (3e44a6f1.adsl.enternet.hu [62.68.166.241]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F68E43D7F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:34:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gandalf@messias.qhigh.com) Received: from [172.16.0.26] (earth.msnet [172.16.0.26]) by messias.qhigh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C462A5C1E; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:40:36 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43C54FE8.4000108@messias.qhigh.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 19:35:20 +0100 From: User Gandalf User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051228) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nathan Vidican , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <43C51106.6030607@messias.qhigh.com> <20060111141248.GS40256@mich2.itxmarket.com> <43C521C7.70005@messias.qhigh.com> <43C52C46.3070604@daleco.biz> <43C54BFE.8060100@messias.qhigh.com> <43C54E67.9070409@wmptl.com> In-Reply-To: <43C54E67.9070409@wmptl.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Create more dsp and mixer devices X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:34:42 -0000 >> > Manually ftp in the .tbz file from ftp.freebsd.org or one of the > mirror sites, and do a 'pkg_add mplayer.tbz'. > > That way you can download it, put on floppy, cd, whatever you have to > to get to the machine in question - everything done in 'sysinstall' > can be done outside of it too ;) > Hmm, another thing I did not know about pkg_add. :-) Thank you! Please forgive me because of these dumb questions. Les From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 18:48:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A33E16A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:48:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33308.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33308.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.123]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A1F0F43D45 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:48:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 28170 invoked by uid 60001); 11 Jan 2006 18:48:26 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=j2HCpRD/cI5A1QNNLgxOqkLId3wr9zDRiW3VkWihtYJd39MxQnDxyccDI1d3/QkdpE3iLvX7ZiHj1K2AOdN/cLehwQ0YqbVeKLuYVSej3V9m0p5SIcQMpMaZWlhMOdHIVu9slkiD+iso8d+HRYeRaURGK5lrG0LA/reV3fn5eNM= ; Message-ID: <20060111184826.28168.qmail@web33308.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33308.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:48:26 PST Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:48:26 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: Peter Wood , Dave Raven In-Reply-To: <43C54E5D.8060608@alastria.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bridging a Cisco Trunk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:48:29 -0000 --- Peter Wood wrote: > Dave, > > > I have two cisco switches, configured to > put ports 2-6 on each of > > them into vlan 100. Then I have port 1 on > both set to trunk between > the two > > switches. If I have a device on port 2 on > switch1 it can ping a device on > > port 2 on switch2. > > I do this quite often, and it works very well > on 6.0 for me. You haven't > mentioned what version your using, but I will > assume you have if_bridge. > If you don't and you're gonna use this machine > alot for bridging, I'd > recommend moving to 6.0. > > So presumably, you have two interfaces, plugged > into the trunk port on > each cisco. For arguements sake, we'll say you > have an fxp0 and fxp1. > > So first step is you need to make sure these > two interfaces are "up", > very important, if they arn't, then it wont > work. It's easy to forget if > you arn't assigning IP's to them. > > Remove "polling" if you don't have it compiled > into the kernel, but > again if you're gonna be bridging packets alot, > get it compiled in. It > helps.... alot. > > ifconfig_fxp0="up polling" > ifconfig_fxp1="up polling" Here we go again with polling. If it "helps alot", did you ever think that maybe interrupt processing on the OS is broken? Because at best it should make a nominal difference. We've already established that FreeBSD doesn't properly account for CPU usage when polling, so what's "alot" better about it? fxp controllers are hard coded to interrupt a maximum of 6000 times per second, which on a modern CPU isn't going to make a noticable difference. In fact 1000 HZ ticks per second probably has just as much overhead with all the other crap it has to do on each tick. DragonflyBSD doesn't even support polling because is *should* be a waste of time (do you think that Matt Dillon is clueless also?). I'm really baffled by the lack of understanding of this subject by virtually everyone in FreeBSDland. DT __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 18:55:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 514D116A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:55:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gandalf@messias.qhigh.com) Received: from messias.qhigh.com (3e44a6f1.adsl.enternet.hu [62.68.166.241]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA34E43D46 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:55:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gandalf@messias.qhigh.com) Received: from [172.16.0.26] (earth.msnet [172.16.0.26]) by messias.qhigh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A137F5C1E; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:01:24 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43C554C8.9030405@messias.qhigh.com> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 19:56:08 +0100 From: User Gandalf User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051228) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Nathan Vidican , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <43C51106.6030607@messias.qhigh.com> <20060111141248.GS40256@mich2.itxmarket.com> <43C521C7.70005@messias.qhigh.com> <43C52C46.3070604@daleco.biz> <43C54BFE.8060100@messias.qhigh.com> <43C54E67.9070409@wmptl.com> In-Reply-To: <43C54E67.9070409@wmptl.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Getting mplayer (Was: Create more dsp and mixer devices) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:55:28 -0000 >> earth# pkg_add -r mplayer >> Error: FTP Unable to get >> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/Latest/mplayer.tbz: >> File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) >> pkg_add: unable to fetch >> 'ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/Latest/mplayer.tbz' >> by URL >> earth# >> > Manually ftp in the .tbz file from ftp.freebsd.org or one of the > mirror sites, and do a 'pkg_add mplayer.tbz'. Where I can get the tbz file? It is not in ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/All neither in ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/Latest Does it mean that it has not been compiled for 6.0 yet? Les From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 18:59:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFA1116A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:59:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from smtp.owt.com (smtp.owt.com [204.118.6.19]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3143E43D45 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:59:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kstewart@owt.com) Received: from topaz-out (owt-207-41-94-233.owt.com [207.41.94.233]) by smtp.owt.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id k0BIxDfp015343; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:59:15 -0800 From: Kent Stewart To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:59:20 -0800 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <43C540A1.7060805@ntlworld.com> In-Reply-To: <43C540A1.7060805@ntlworld.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200601111059.21012.kstewart@owt.com> Cc: Crispy Beef Subject: Re: 4.6-RELEASE to 6.0-RELEASE... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:59:26 -0000 On Wednesday 11 January 2006 09:30 am, Crispy Beef wrote: > Hi, > > I have a production server running 4.6-RELEASE and I would like to > bring it upto date and get 6.0-RELEASE on there. I have a rough idea > of what needs to be done to accomplish this from reading various docs > but it would be nice to see how smoothly it has gone for any others. There have been major changes in processes such as threads. You also=20 have to boot the 5.3 update in single user mode to have a kernel that=20 accepts the new arrangement and then install the userland. Before 5.1=20 or 5.2 it didn't matter much but there was an fs change that you update=20 in single user mode or boot the fix disc to finish the botched update. You also have the problem that probably none of your ports from 4.x will=20 work at 6.0. This could take quite a bit of time to upgrade. I don't think you can do src upgrade remote unless you have a serial=20 console setup. I also think you are better off building new HDs and=20 install them in the remote machine. Kent > > From what I can tell I first need to upgrade to a minimum of > 5.3-RELEASE and then onto 6.0, so I guess doing a cvsup to the > 5.3-RELEASE and then doing buildworld et all? Then from there to > same to get to 6.0? > > My main concern is the filesystem, it's been updated since 4.x? Will > this mess things up? > > The machine is remote so I really need to make sure this works > without making it inaccessible. I have a box here to trial run the > process on so I get the steps correct first time, but thought I'd ask > here too. :-) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" =2D-=20 Kent Stewart Richland, WA "Nunca te acostar=E1s sin saber una cosa m=E1s" http://users.owt.com/kstewart/index.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 19:08:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC2CD16A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 19:08:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta11.adelphia.net (mta11.adelphia.net [68.168.78.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D9743D4C for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 19:08:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.117]) by mta11.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060111190816.RJV5278.mta11.adelphia.net@barbish>; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:08:16 -0500 From: "fbsd_user" To: "Crispy Beef" , Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:08:11 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <43C540A1.7060805@ntlworld.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: 4.6-RELEASE to 6.0-RELEASE... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 19:08:20 -0000 There is a new and faster file system which is introduced in release-5.4. I highly recommend that you install 6.0 from scratch and build your old server services anew to a development box you have personal access to. Then remove the hard drive and ship it to you remote site and swap with your production drive. That way you get the new file system in production and have quick fall back if things don't work. There is a lot of maintenance benefits to be had from a new clean built from scratch server. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Crispy Beef Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 12:30 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: 4.6-RELEASE to 6.0-RELEASE... Hi, I have a production server running 4.6-RELEASE and I would like to bring it upto date and get 6.0-RELEASE on there. I have a rough idea of what needs to be done to accomplish this from reading various docs but it would be nice to see how smoothly it has gone for any others. From what I can tell I first need to upgrade to a minimum of 5.3-RELEASE and then onto 6.0, so I guess doing a cvsup to the 5.3-RELEASE and then doing buildworld et all? Then from there to same to get to 6.0? My main concern is the filesystem, it's been updated since 4.x? Will this mess things up? The machine is remote so I really need to make sure this works without making it inaccessible. I have a box here to trial run the process on so I get the steps correct first time, but thought I'd ask here too. :-) _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 19:42:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A60FB16A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 19:42:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from smtp2.suscom.net (smtp2.suscom.net [64.78.83.231]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05BF743D49 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 19:42:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from localhost (smtp2.suscom.net [127.0.0.1]) by smtp2.suscom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2AC31CDC9E for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:39:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp2.suscom.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp2 [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00968-02 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:39:40 -0500 (EST) Received: from seibercom.net (ip148.217.susc.suscom.net [216.45.217.148]) by smtp2.suscom.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 6024A1CDCFC for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:33:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (budman [192.168.0.2]) by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0BJa6KH041323 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:36:06 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:36:08 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: gerard@seibercom.net Organization: Seibercom.net In-Reply-To: <20060111150356.60259.qmail@web33311.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20060111150356.60259.qmail@web33311.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20060111143450.1D2E.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.24.01 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1238/Wed Jan 11 05:19:06 2006 on seibercom.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at suscom.net Subject: Re: Dual Core vs HyperThreading vs Dual CPU X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 19:42:33 -0000 Danial Thom > > > --- "Andrew P." wrote: > > > On 1/10/06, Marc G. Fournier > > wrote: > > > > > > I'm going to assume that Dual Core is better > > (can't believe that they took > > > a step back) ... but, is how does it rate? I > > know that HyperThreading is > > > definitely != Dual CPU ... but how close does > > Dual Core get? > > > > There is extensive evidence (google for that, > > please), that > > HT is even slower than a single core in quite a > > few applications. > > Moreover, the whole HT implementation has been > > shown to > > be a security risk. In the near future intel is > > going to spend $1.9bn > > on its new marketing campaign. If you wanna be > > part of it, > > buy their CPU, half of the money will be in > > your nearest billboard. > > > > Dual-core is a new, and a very smart concept, > > which is exactly > > equal to a dual-cpu configuration in terms of > > performance per > > core - plus it provides a huge cut down on > > power consumption, > > and a theoretically hugely faster > > interconnection between the > > cores (they are physically many times closer). > > Thats not entirely true, as its not *exactly* the > same. It looks the same to an O/S, but things are > wire differently, so there are likely to be some > differences. > > > > > By 2010 we'll see 4-core, 8-core and maybe even > > 16/32 solutions. > > Intel has implied that they will have > multi-multicore processors (more then 2) a lot > sooner than you think. But for now the multicore > thing is just marketing hype because most O/Ses > don't utilize DP efficiently enough to make the > gains worthwhile. You'll likely see more urgency > to produce them when OS'es can actually benefit > from them. Most people today who use DP system > just "assume" they are faster or better without > having any real clue if they are or not. > > DT > Dell has a graphic display of the difference between its processors available at: http://www1.us.dell.com/content/topics/topic.aspx/global/products/dimen/topics/en/dimen_xps600_sp_specs?c=us&cs=19&l=en&s=dhs Click on "Tech Specs" to view it. -- Gerard Seibert gerard@seibercom.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 19:55:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E637E16A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 19:55:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@xecu.net) Received: from mss2.myactv.net (mss2.myactv.net [24.89.0.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 63AA643D46 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 19:55:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@xecu.net) Received: (qmail 7947 invoked from network); 11 Jan 2006 19:54:59 -0000 Received: from stat-153-127-112.myactv.net (HELO ?192.168.1.86?) (24.153.127.112) by mss2.myactv.net with SMTP; 11 Jan 2006 19:54:59 -0000 Message-ID: <43C5628D.9090103@xecu.net> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 14:54:53 -0500 From: Christopher McGee User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Freebsd to Sonicwall vpn tunnel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 19:55:01 -0000 I have been searching far and wide for working examples of a site-to-site vpn tunnel from a freebsd firewall to a sonicwall appliance(Pro 2040). I can't even seem to make it work with it using anonymous in the racoon.conf, however, at some point I need it to use a specific sa for the sonicwall so tunnels connect using anon. Here are the errors I get from the various logs. From the sonicwall: IKE negotiation complete. Adding IPSec SA. (Phase 2) From racoon.log: 2006-01-11 14:21:38: INFO: isakmp.c:808:isakmp_ph1begin_i(): initiate new phase 1 negotiation: 24.153.127.112[500]<=>12.96.91.86[500] 2006-01-11 14:21:38: INFO: isakmp.c:813:isakmp_ph1begin_i(): begin Identity Protection mode. 2006-01-11 14:21:38: INFO: isakmp.c:2459:log_ph1established(): ISAKMP-SA established freebsd-ip[500]-sonicwall-ip[500] spi:960f1f7cdc88e2ac:b89856165f09f180 2006-01-11 14:21:39: INFO: isakmp.c:952:isakmp_ph2begin_i(): initiate new phase 2 negotiation: freebsd-ip[0]<=>sonicwall-ip[0] 2006-01-11 14:21:39: ERROR: isakmp_inf.c:843:isakmp_info_recv_n(): unknown notify message, no phase2 handle found. 2006-01-11 14:21:54: ERROR: pfkey.c:804:pfkey_timeover(): sonicwall-ip give up to get IPsec-SA due to time up to wait. 2006-01-11 14:22:05: INFO: isakmp.c:952:isakmp_ph2begin_i(): initiate new phase 2 negotiation: freebsd-ip[0]<=>sonicwall-ip[0] 2006-01-11 14:22:05: ERROR: isakmp_inf.c:843:isakmp_info_recv_n(): unknown notify message, no phase2 handle found. I have working tunnels from the sonicwall to other sonicwall. I also have working tunnels from the freebsd box to other freebsd machines. Has anyone else done what I'm trying to do successfully? Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 20:24:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1650C16A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:24:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 208D143D55 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:24:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from broadpark.no ([217.13.4.96]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0ISY00LS63L81540@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:29:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from [80.202.4.61] (Forwarded-For: [213.187.181.70]) by bgo1mstore1.broadpark.no (mshttpd); Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:24:35 +0100 Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:24:35 +0100 From: Kristian Vaaf To: questions@freebsd.org Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sun Java(tm) System Messenger Express 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-language: en Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-Accept-Language: en Priority: normal Cc: Subject: My script to replace strings in ASCII files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:24:29 -0000 Hello! Just curious, what do I need to do to be able to execute this script like: $ text-replace old_string new_string I find it a bit inconvenient having to edit the script for every thing I need to replace. Thanks, Kristian #!/usr/local/bin/bash # # Replace old with new inside all text files. # $URBAN: text-replace.sh,v 1.0 2005/10/24 15:09:05 vaaf Exp $ # for file in `find . -type f ! -name ".*"`; do if [ "`file -b "$file" | grep text`" != "" ]; then sed -i '' "s/old/new/g" "$file" echo "$file: Done" fi done From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 20:36:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9399A16A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:36:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33314.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33314.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 34EE943D55 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:36:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 46023 invoked by uid 60001); 11 Jan 2006 20:36:16 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=VPRPkXA/EvO/J4HLTPl/7ULrRxUWcBWJt+pi4109fjR6KW+bif0Al3h91mRzDwa2x13uOZIaSaXWscHQhZ5ZyTY4R9MrB1LkCJsJQWTl9ziUAUBrxzM+xlZ/aoTaMenKrGCE+OcyDmQ+yHy7bv4uIf/S778/dCj6UygS25SWj8k= ; Message-ID: <20060111203616.46021.qmail@web33314.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33314.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:36:16 PST Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 12:36:16 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060111143450.1D2E.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Dual Core vs HyperThreading vs Dual CPU X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:36:17 -0000 --- Gerard Seibert wrote: > Danial Thom > > > > > > > --- "Andrew P." wrote: > > > > > On 1/10/06, Marc G. Fournier > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > I'm going to assume that Dual Core is > better > > > (can't believe that they took > > > > a step back) ... but, is how does it > rate? I > > > know that HyperThreading is > > > > definitely != Dual CPU ... but how close > does > > > Dual Core get? > > > > > > There is extensive evidence (google for > that, > > > please), that > > > HT is even slower than a single core in > quite a > > > few applications. > > > Moreover, the whole HT implementation has > been > > > shown to > > > be a security risk. In the near future > intel is > > > going to spend $1.9bn > > > on its new marketing campaign. If you wanna > be > > > part of it, > > > buy their CPU, half of the money will be in > > > your nearest billboard. > > > > > > Dual-core is a new, and a very smart > concept, > > > which is exactly > > > equal to a dual-cpu configuration in terms > of > > > performance per > > > core - plus it provides a huge cut down on > > > power consumption, > > > and a theoretically hugely faster > > > interconnection between the > > > cores (they are physically many times > closer). > > > > Thats not entirely true, as its not *exactly* > the > > same. It looks the same to an O/S, but things > are > > wire differently, so there are likely to be > some > > differences. > > > > > > > > By 2010 we'll see 4-core, 8-core and maybe > even > > > 16/32 solutions. > > > > Intel has implied that they will have > > multi-multicore processors (more then 2) a > lot > > sooner than you think. But for now the > multicore > > thing is just marketing hype because most > O/Ses > > don't utilize DP efficiently enough to make > the > > gains worthwhile. You'll likely see more > urgency > > to produce them when OS'es can actually > benefit > > from them. Most people today who use DP > system > > just "assume" they are faster or better > without > > having any real clue if they are or not. > > > > DT > > > Dell has a graphic display of the difference > between its processors > available at: > > http://www1.us.dell.com/content/topics/topic.aspx/global/products/dimen/topics/en/dimen_xps600_sp_specs?c=us&cs=19&l=en&s=dhs Wait, I can "download music, run a virus scanner and play games" all at the same time? wow. Wait, I can do that anyway. Does each core have its own hard drive too? I wonder how many meetings they had before they came up with that "description" of the benefits of dual core technology. People are so easily bamboozled. DT __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 20:37:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D54816A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:37:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vocativus@interia.pl) Received: from smtp.poczta.interia.pl (smtp2.poczta.interia.pl [213.25.80.232]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CF7B43D5A for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:37:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vocativus@interia.pl) Received: by smtp.poczta.interia.pl (INTERIA.PL, from userid 502) id DD160D20BB; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:37:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from poczta.interia.pl (mi03.poczta.interia.pl [10.217.12.3]) by smtp.poczta.interia.pl (INTERIA.PL) with ESMTP id D7EA5D259F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:37:30 +0100 (CET) Received: by poczta.interia.pl (INTERIA.PL, from userid 502) id C1A3E3C35D; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:37:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (unknown [212.106.155.43]) by poczta.interia.pl (INTERIA.PL) with ESMTP id 440FD3C376 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:37:30 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:36:47 +0100 From: vocativus X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.5.22) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1965019375.20060111213647@interia.pl> To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1250 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-EMID: 41ca2acc Cc: Subject: Pooomooocyyyy ;( X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: vocativus List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:37:52 -0000 Witam! Mam du¿y problem z FreeBSD. Mianowicie... œci¹g³em sobie system ze strony www.freebsd.org wypali³em na 2 p³ytach CD i zainstalowa³em. Wszystko dobrze chodzi³o... do czasu a¿ zmieni³em komputer tzn. dysk twardy, RAM i nagrywarke mam ze starego. Moja stara konfiguracja: P³yta g³. ASrock k7s8x, 384MB RAM, GeForce 2 MX 400, Dyski twarde: Western Digital 40 GB (ATA 133), i Samsung 60GB (ATA 133). Procesor: Duron 1400 Karta sieciowa - SIS 10/100 zintegrowana z p³yt¹ g³ówn¹ Karta dŸwiêkowa - AC 97 <- system jej nie wykrywa³ poprawnie Na powy¿szym sprzêcie system pracowa³ bezb³êdnie, z wyj¹tkiem wspomnianej karty dŸwiêkowej. Moja obecna konfiguracja: P³. g³ówna: 939NF4G - SATA2 Procesor: AMD Athlon 64 3200+ venice socket 939 Karta graficzna - zintegrowana z p³yt¹ g³ówn¹ - GeForce 6100 - pamiêæ 128MB Karta sieciowa - zintegrowana z p³yt¹ g³ówn¹ - Realtek PHY RTL8201CL Karta dŸwiêkowa - Realtek ALC850 7.1channel AC'97 audio codec RAM - 768MB (128 zarezerwowane dla karty graficznej wiêc dostêpne jest 640MB RAM) Wersja BIOS-u - P1.30 I wzi¹³em wyczyszczony dysk (bez jakichkolwiek partycji) pod³¹czony jako jedyny dysk, po wybraniu opcji default boot, wybraniu opcji standard, naciœniêciu ok w oknie gdzie pisze coœ o fdisk-u, wybraniu dysku - w moim przypadku ad0 wyœwietla sie komunikat: Warning: A geometry of 77545/16/63 for ad0 is incorrect. Using a more likely geometry. If this geometry is incorrect or you are unsure as to whether or not it's correct, please consult the Hardware Guide in the Documentation submenu or use the (G)eometry command to change it now Remember: you need to enter whatever your BIOS thinks the geometry is! For IDE it's what yoy were told in the BIOS setup. For SCSI, it's the translation mode your controller is using. Do NOT use a "physical geometry" I nic da³em na ok, rozplanowa³em partycje da³em na instaluj i pojawi³ mi siê komunikat o b³êdzie, ¿e nie mo¿na zapisaæ danych na dysk i na tym koniec. Próbowa³em zainstalowaæ FreeBSD w wersji 5.4 (i386), 6.0 (i386), 6.0 (AMD 64) i ci¹gle siê pojawia ten komunikat. Jeœli to Was pocieszy, to linux SuSE nie wykry³ mi wogóle ¿adnego sprzêtu, za wyj¹tkiem drukarki. Czy ja mam na tyle nietypow¹ konfiguracje, ¿e ¿aden linux nie jest w stanie prawid³owo rozpoznaæ mojego sprzêtu??? Nie by³oby takiego problemu, gdyby nie to, ¿e musze mieæ linuxa, bo chodzê do liceum na profil matematyczno - fizyczno - informatyczny i linuxa musze mieæ... Prêdzej te¿ go mia³em zainstalowanego, ale g³ównie do zabawy, w celu poznania czegoœ innego oprócz windowsa. I musze powiedzieæ, ¿e FreeBSD to, jak dot¹d najlepszy linux, z jakim siê spotka³em. Jego instalacja jest z leksza dziwna, ale z 23 - stronicow¹ instrukcj¹ instalacji nie ma najmniejszego problemu. FreeBSD zaskoczy³ mnie g³ównie prostot¹ i niemal¿e ca³kowit¹ automatyzacj¹ instalacji programów, np. poprzez porty. To doskona³e rozwi¹zanie. I w³aœnie dlatego wybra³em FreeBSD - jest funkcjonalny, na tych dwóch p³ytach jest wiêcej oprogramowania ni¿ w innych dystrybucjach. Jest ³atwy w obs³ude, chocia¿ musze przyznaæ, ¿e pocz¹tki by³y tragiczne... ale to chyba normalne. Grunt to sie przyzwyczaiæ :) Dlatego prosze Was o pomoc... kompletnie nie wiem co robiæ... pooomooocyyyyyyyyy ;( ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Jedyny taki CZAT! >>> http://link.interia.pl/f18ee From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 20:40:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14D3616A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:40:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 32F8B43D4C for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:40:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lars@gmx.at) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 11 Jan 2006 20:40:37 -0000 Received: from 5.55.79.83.cust.bluewin.ch (EHLO [192.168.1.10]) [83.79.55.5] by mail.gmx.net (mp035) with SMTP; 11 Jan 2006 21:40:37 +0100 X-Authenticated: #912863 Message-ID: <43C56D47.1040809@gmx.at> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:40:39 +0100 From: lars User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051215) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: My script to replace strings in ASCII files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:40:40 -0000 Kristian Vaaf wrote: > Hello! > > Just curious, what do I need to do to be able to execute this script like: > > $ text-replace old_string new_string > > I find it a bit inconvenient having to edit the script for every thing I need to replace. > > Thanks, > Kristian > > #!/usr/local/bin/bash > # > # Replace old with new inside all text files. > # $URBAN: text-replace.sh,v 1.0 2005/10/24 15:09:05 vaaf Exp $ > # > > for file in `find . -type f ! -name ".*"`; do > > if [ "`file -b "$file" | grep text`" != "" ]; then > > sed -i '' "s/old/new/g" "$file" > > echo "$file: Done" > > fi > > done Why not open the file with vim and then :.,$s/old/new/ Of course that's not scriptable... Maybe you should interpolate the first and the second argument into your regexes in the substitution with sed, so you get "s/argument1/argument2/" Perl might help though. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 20:46:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C3616A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:46:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41FE643D4C for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:46:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 523B35DF4; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:46:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 22267-03; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:46:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from [199.103.21.238] (pan.codefab.com [199.103.21.238]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 912F45CFC; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:46:25 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <23FC76D5-450C-4C07-8D46-782C86E6D6B3@mac.com> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Charles Swiger Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:46:23 -0500 To: Kristian Vaaf X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: My script to replace strings in ASCII files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:46:31 -0000 On Jan 11, 2006, at 3:24 PM, Kristian Vaaf wrote: > Just curious, what do I need to do to be able to execute this > script like: > > $ text-replace old_string new_string > > I find it a bit inconvenient having to edit the script for every > thing I need to replace. Use positional arguments $1 and $2, rather than "old" and "new" in the sed statement. -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 20:47:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C82F016A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:47:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34BAA43D6B for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:47:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2) with ESMTP id k0BKlPiU019515; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:47:25 -0500 (EST) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2/Submit) id k0BKlObZ019514; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:47:24 -0500 (EST) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200601112047.k0BKlObZ019514@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: vaaf@broadpark.no (Kristian Vaaf) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:47:24 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL7] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: My script to replace strings in ASCII files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:47:31 -0000 > > > Hello! > > Just curious, what do I need to do to be able to execute this script like: > > $ text-replace old_string new_string Check out tr(1). It does a good job of it with very simple rules. ////jerry > > I find it a bit inconvenient having to edit the script for every thing I need to replace. > > Thanks, > Kristian > > #!/usr/local/bin/bash > # > # Replace old with new inside all text files. > # $URBAN: text-replace.sh,v 1.0 2005/10/24 15:09:05 vaaf Exp $ > # > > for file in `find . -type f ! -name ".*"`; do > > if [ "`file -b "$file" | grep text`" != "" ]; then > > sed -i '' "s/old/new/g" "$file" > > echo "$file: Done" > > fi > > done > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 20:59:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44E4C16A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:59:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gollum123@free.fr) Received: from smtp5-g19.free.fr (smtp5-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD75143D48 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:59:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gollum123@free.fr) Received: from [192.168.0.140] (tui75-2-82-229-178-102.fbx.proxad.net [82.229.178.102]) by smtp5-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A22651718E; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:59:42 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:22:38 +0100 From: Mathieu CHATEAU X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.62.12) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1895448930.20060111092238@free.fr> To: "Andrew P." In-Reply-To: References: <668593540.20060110201251@free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re[2]: fstab - mount_nfs - -L parameter X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mathieu CHATEAU List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:59:44 -0000 Tuesday, January 10, 2006, 9:19:52 PM, you wrote: AP> On 1/10/06, Mathieu CHATEAU wrote: >> Hello all, >> >> I need to mount an nfs volume with the "-L" params. >> >> It works great by hand : >> mount_nfs -L server:/share >> >> but fstab refuses the -L params... AP> really? What does it say? Do you have "ro" or "rw" present in the AP> options? Here's my line that works: AP> lan-217:/mnt/200a /mnt/200a nfs -L,ro 0 0 Sorry, it was my fault, i tried L,rw without the "-" Thanks man ! Mathieu CHATEAU From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 21:37:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7969516A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:37:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from ezekiel.daleco.biz (southernuniform.com [66.76.92.18]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA0BD43D49 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:37:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from [192.168.2.2] ([69.27.149.254]) by ezekiel.daleco.biz (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k0BLZr66018415; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:36:14 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Message-ID: <43C57A2F.50504@daleco.biz> Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:35:43 -0600 From: Kevin Kinsey User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051026 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: User Gandalf References: <43C51106.6030607@messias.qhigh.com> <20060111141248.GS40256@mich2.itxmarket.com> <43C521C7.70005@messias.qhigh.com> <43C52C46.3070604@daleco.biz> <43C54BFE.8060100@messias.qhigh.com> <43C54E67.9070409@wmptl.com> <43C554C8.9030405@messias.qhigh.com> In-Reply-To: <43C554C8.9030405@messias.qhigh.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Getting mplayer (Was: Create more dsp and mixer devices) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:37:17 -0000 User Gandalf wrote: > >>> earth# pkg_add -r mplayer >>> Error: FTP Unable to get >>> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/Latest/mplayer.tbz: >>> File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) >>> pkg_add: unable to fetch >>> 'ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/Latest/mplayer.tbz' >>> by URL >>> earth# >>> >> Manually ftp in the .tbz file from ftp.freebsd.org or one of the >> mirror sites, and do a 'pkg_add mplayer.tbz'. > > > Where I can get the tbz file? It is not in > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/All > > neither in > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-6-stable/Latest > > Does it mean that it has not been compiled for 6.0 yet? > > Les > It shouldn't mean that, but I've no explanation. I don't find it in a lot of places, but see no mention of it at http://pointyhat.freebsd.org. Not sure where to go with it then, now. I'm not subscribed to ports@, perhaps I'll try a 'send-pr'. At worst I'll be flamed by some overworked admin ;-) But, generally, FreeBSD isn't like that, so I'm really not so worried about it. Kevin Kinsey -- Don't vote - it only encourages them! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 22:03:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64EEF16A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 22:03:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itmngr@cooperationireland.org) Received: from smtp1.irishbroadband.ie (smtp1.irishbroadband.ie [62.231.32.12]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEBBF43D45 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 22:03:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itmngr@cooperationireland.org) Received: from [62.231.53.178] (helo=mail.cooperationireland.org) by smtp1.irishbroadband.ie with esmtp (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Ewo4L-000MsQ-Kk; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 22:03:49 +0000 Received: from [10.0.1.20] ([10.0.1.20]) by mail.cooperationireland.org (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k0BM2h0P029336; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 22:02:43 GMT (envelope-from itmngr@cooperationireland.org) In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Michael Doyle Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 22:04:15 +0000 To: JK X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.4 required=6.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on mail.cooperationireland.org X-CoopIrl-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-CoopIrl-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-CoopIrl-MailScanner-From: itmngr@cooperationireland.org X-Scan-Signature: 5d78bcdd0b6429df751511f7ea991b74 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 6.0 on Apple's Intel Developer Platform? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 22:03:53 -0000 On 9 Jan 2006, at 20:41, JK wrote: > I can get the 6.0 CD1 to boot ok on Apple's Intel Developers > Platform but the usb keyboard is not recognized. Do I have to do > something special to use a USB keyboard? There is no PS/2 keyboard > or mouse port on that platform. Is the Boot CD image not recognising the USB port, or not recognising the Apple keyboard? If the latter, then a standard Windows/PC USB keyboard should work. I know that PC keyboards and Apple keyboards have different lay-outs and may act differently. PC keyboards work in a Mac. The converse may not be true (haven't tried it) Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 23:13:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A32816A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 23:13:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from ext-gw.lemis.com (ext-gw.lemis.com [150.101.14.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F8F843D46 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 23:13:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from wantadilla.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.135]) by ext-gw.lemis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44743131BB4; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:43:55 +1030 (CST) Received: by wantadilla.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 19567855D2; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:43:55 +1030 (CST) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:43:55 +1030 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: "Michael W. Lucas" Message-ID: <20060111231355.GA73071@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <20060109195342.GA35789@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> <736C118F-A6DD-4476-9437-935C43A22771@submonkey.net> <20060110222616.GA45029@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> <20060110234752.GO73071@wantadilla.lemis.com> <43C49EC7.9020003@daleco.biz> <20060111142246.GA50712@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="M9u+pkcMrQJw6us1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060111142246.GA50712@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 VoIP: sip:0871270137@sip.internode.on.net WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: replacement for Acrobat Professional? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 23:13:57 -0000 --M9u+pkcMrQJw6us1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday, 11 January 2006 at 9:22:46 -0500, Michael W. Lucas wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:59:35PM -0600, Kevin Kinsey wrote: >> It's up to Michael, though, to tell us how well it works, I suppose. No >> package in packages-6-current/Latest, so I'm building from src, and >> headed for bed before it gets done I imagine. > > So, for posterity... > > I'd rate pdftops and flpsed as 95% of the way there for this > audience. ===> Generating temporary packing list install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 /usr/ports/print/flpsed/work/flpsed-0.3.5/src/flpsed /usr/X11R6/bin install -o root -g wheel -m 444 /usr/ports/print/flpsed/work/flpsed-0.3.5/README /usr/X11R6/share/doc/flpsed *sigh* Yet Another Undocumented Program. "README" is 92 lines long, half of which deals with installation issues. I'll look later. > Some small things don't work, particularly "layered" elements. Some > parts of the manuscript I was given were highlighted, for example. In > the original the highlighting is transparent, while the pdftops/flpsed > combination the highlighting obliterates the underlying text. There > are other, very minor variations. > > That last 5% might not be critical for most people; I would > certainly use it for preparing personal documents, or even documents > within my company. But OpenOffice's PDF export is far easier for > preparing PDFs in general. And ghostscript is even easier. I'd need convincing that any PDF editor is the correct way to prepare documents; there are much more precise tools available for that. I thought your original requirement was to mark up existing PDFs, and it still sounds like a good idea for that. Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address and phone numbers. --M9u+pkcMrQJw6us1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDxZEzIubykFB6QiMRAvNPAKCaRYjXbNRmavcNwTJcuNE8a9pkMwCfa28I 5UDuxhE764sgcAl4/6kw6mM= =Av4N -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --M9u+pkcMrQJw6us1-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 23:14:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5396F16A41F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 23:14:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from mta11.adelphia.net (mta11.adelphia.net [68.168.78.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D981843D46 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 23:13:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from default.chvlva.adelphia.net ([68.67.248.200]) by mta11.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060111231358.UQKU5278.mta11.adelphia.net@default.chvlva.adelphia.net>; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:13:58 -0500 Received: by default.chvlva.adelphia.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D4EC5B4D5; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:13:43 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:13:43 -0500 From: Parv To: Jerry McAllister Message-ID: <20060111231343.GA28403@holestein.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: Jerry McAllister , Kristian Vaaf , questions@freebsd.org References: <200601112047.k0BKlObZ019514@clunix.cl.msu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200601112047.k0BKlObZ019514@clunix.cl.msu.edu> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: My script to replace strings in ASCII files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 23:14:00 -0000 in message <200601112047.k0BKlObZ019514@clunix.cl.msu.edu>, wrote Jerry McAllister thusly... > > > Just curious, what do I need to do to be able to execute this > > script like: > > > > $ text-replace old_string new_string > > Check out tr(1). > It does a good job of it with very simple rules. ... > > sed -i '' "s/old/new/g" "$file" tr(1) takes a *set of characters* in a string, not the given string as it is, to "translate characters" .. echo 'polka dot' | tr 'pol' 'x' ... in the OP's context, above should produce "xka dot" but produces instead "xxxka dxt". - Parv -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 11 23:30:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49CDF16A420; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 23:30:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mwlucas@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org) Received: from bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org [198.22.63.43]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F0FB43D45; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 23:30:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mwlucas@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org) Received: from bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (mwlucas@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k0BNUOnZ054977; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:30:24 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mwlucas@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org) Received: (from mwlucas@localhost) by bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id k0BNUO9v054976; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:30:24 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mwlucas) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:30:24 -0500 From: "Michael W. Lucas" To: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" Message-ID: <20060111233023.GA54907@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> References: <20060109195342.GA35789@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> <736C118F-A6DD-4476-9437-935C43A22771@submonkey.net> <20060110222616.GA45029@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> <20060110234752.GO73071@wantadilla.lemis.com> <43C49EC7.9020003@daleco.biz> <20060111142246.GA50712@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> <20060111231355.GA73071@wantadilla.lemis.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060111231355.GA73071@wantadilla.lemis.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Spam-Score: (0) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.39 Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: replacement for Acrobat Professional? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 23:30:26 -0000 --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 09:43:55AM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > *sigh* Yet Another Undocumented Program. "README" is 92 lines long, > half of which deals with installation issues. I'll look later. It has a minimal GUI with some usable stuff for what I wanted. > > But OpenOffice's PDF export is far easier for > > preparing PDFs in general. >=20 > And ghostscript is even easier. If, say, you're the sort of guy who writes entire books in troff/mdoc/etc. :-) =46rom what I know of how you work, I imagine that flpsed would not be very helpful. > I'd need convincing that any PDF editor is the correct way to prepare > documents; there are much more precise tools available for that. =20 Agreed, completely and absolutely. > I > thought your original requirement was to mark up existing PDFs, and it > still sounds like a good idea for that. That is the requirement: they send me the final PDFs with the page layouts all done, and their comments in the margins. I go through and make my comments direct in the document, and then they have someone go through and rearrange according to my comments on their comments, strip out everyone's comments, and send it to the printer. Scary? Yes. Terrifying, actually. But more and more web presses speak PDF. It could be worse; they *could* speak only MS .doc... And hey, I imagine that *you* of all people would understand dealing with publishers and printers. :-) =3D=3Dml --=20 Michael W. Lucas mwlucas@FreeBSD.org, mwlucas@BlackHelicopters.org http://www.BlackHelicopters.org/~mwlucas/ "The cloak of anonymity protects me from the nuisance of caring." -Non Sequ= itur --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDxZUPwHOsVeaMSbwRAs1gAKDAfROUNEVQpWKmtd+OcKYTKlemiACgnGFG 8rJuUY2d/m1bjIjRkIaQQHw= =D92X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7JfCtLOvnd9MIVvH-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 00:09:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85CBB16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 00:09:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91AC243D49 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 00:09:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9]) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.5+UW05.10/8.13.5+UW05.09) with ESMTP id k0C09vRH002274 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:09:58 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [128.208.4.15] (shiina.dyn.cs.washington.edu [128.208.4.15]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.5+UW05.10/8.13.5+UW05.09) with ESMTP id k0C09tAU006793 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:09:57 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) In-Reply-To: <20060111203616.46021.qmail@web33314.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20060111203616.46021.qmail@web33314.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <00B61835-9B73-4058-ABDF-888B522B1A97@u.washington.edu> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Garrett Cooper Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:10:51 -0800 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' Subject: Re: Dual Core vs HyperThreading vs Dual CPU X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 00:09:59 -0000 On Jan 11, 2006, at 12:36 PM, Danial Thom wrote: > Wait, I can "download music, run a virus scanner > and play games" all at the same time? wow. Wait, > I can do that anyway. Does each core have its own > hard drive too? > > I wonder how many meetings they had before they > came up with that "description" of the benefits > of dual core technology. People are so easily > bamboozled. > > DT No kidding. But I doubt the competence of people that buy computers from big name manufacturers, unless they bought it maybe for server applications, large scale deployment of machines, etc. Gotta love their little Flash graphics with the "balls" representing "bits", just hopping along the CPU/cores... lol. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 00:12:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6107816A420 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 00:12:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cracauer@schlepper.zs64.net) Received: from schlepper.zs64.net (schlepper.zs64.net [212.12.50.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C626843D6B for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 00:12:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cracauer@schlepper.zs64.net) Received: from schlepper.zs64.net (schlepper [212.12.50.230]) by schlepper.zs64.net (8.13.3/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k0C0CP5f093299; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 01:12:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from cracauer@schlepper.zs64.net) Received: (from cracauer@localhost) by schlepper.zs64.net (8.13.3/8.12.9/Submit) id k0C0CP68093298; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 19:12:25 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from cracauer) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 19:12:24 -0500 From: Martin Cracauer To: "Marc G. Fournier" Message-ID: <20060111191224.A93090@cons.org> References: <20060110125050.A48499@ganymede.hub.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20060110125050.A48499@ganymede.hub.org>; from scrappy@hub.org on Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 12:52:24PM -0400 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dual Core vs HyperThreading vs Dual CPU X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 00:12:29 -0000 Marc G. Fournier wrote on Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 12:52:24PM -0400: > > I'm going to assume that Dual Core is better (can't believe that they took > a step back) ... but, is how does it rate? I know that HyperThreading is > definitely != Dual CPU ... but how close does Dual Core get? It is the real thing, at least when it comes to AMD64 and Netburst-based Intel dual-cores. Every core has a full set of own caches just like dual CPU. Yonah (dual-core Pentium-M) has a shared L2 cache. I have benchmarks comparing dual-core 939 socket systems against dual 940 socket systems here: http://cracauer-forum.cons.org/forum/crabench.html In practice, if you compare socket 939 dual-core and 940 dual-CPU there is a little more. In highend mainboard a dual 940 board will have one memory bank per CPU (which is pretty useless performance-wise for general-purpose applications). Socket 939 systems can have faster RAM (a little less useless) but are limited to 4 GB and there is some BWCing to get ECC. CPUs are limited to 2.6 GHz with the FX-60. Socket 940 single-core CPUs can be had up to 2.8 GHz. Martin -- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Martin Cracauer http://www.cons.org/cracauer/ FreeBSD - where you want to go, today. http://www.freebsd.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 01:47:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B12B16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 01:47:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ryallsd@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D134543D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 01:47:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ryallsd@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t12so221302wxc for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:47:37 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=oezFIGTLYxSmCn7Q2hk7XCTGriVci2w4yZITkR/nqEa2R505pwxuKOTurGVtyIJBH8QGy2sJ3V8T5A8UUs47PPY5b0Da7qpi2Kuku0CJkwu5OvWkVCZblH/BCBkQFnW4Vveo5QzNCDS6qwSj+yvypQU/jk+WgKcAkLkFpdKVP9s= Received: by 10.70.82.5 with SMTP id f5mr1665047wxb; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:47:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.15.15 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:47:36 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 17:47:36 -0800 From: Derrick Ryalls To: danial_thom@yahoo.com In-Reply-To: <20060106164008.89374.qmail@web33310.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20060106164008.89374.qmail@web33310.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, azri abdul majid Subject: Re: memory requirement X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 01:47:38 -0000 > > > > That's what I am thinking about. As a linux > > user for such a long time, > > its quite dissappointed to say that linux has > > become a monster. > > Ah, but mp3s are nice and smooth!!! :-) > > If you don't need any of the newer features, I'd > suggest FreeBSD 4.x rather than a newer version. > It was designed to run on lower end system and > its much more efficient. > > DT Agreed, I maintain a 4.x system on a P-75 with probably 16M ram. I think i= t took about 25 hours to do a buildworld for router functionality. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 01:55:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43CD616A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 01:55:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from hobbiton.shire.net (mail.shire.net [166.70.252.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2C9643D48 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 01:55:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from [67.161.222.227] (helo=[192.168.99.68]) by hobbiton.shire.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.51) id 1EwrgU-000EKp-NJ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:55:26 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <1A8EA6AA-DC0A-4DCA-ABEF-639984BA80B1@shire.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: Free BSD Questions list From: Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:55:26 -0700 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.161.222.227 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: chad@shire.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on hobbiton.shire.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: can't build Java 1.5.0 on FreeBSD/i386 6.0-RELEASE (inside jail) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 01:55:28 -0000 Hi I have successfully built Java 1.4.2 inside a jail on 5.4, but am having problems doing the same thing for 1.5.0 on 6.0. I have all the Sun stuff downloaded as well as the linux 1.4.2 runtime port installed fine. The build ran for a million hours. At which point it came back with: gmake[5]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make/ sun/javac/javac' gmake /usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/control/build/bsd-i586/bin/javac VARIANT=OPT gmake[6]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make/ sun/javac/javac' rm -f /usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/control/build/bsd-i586/tmp/sun/ com.sun.tools.javac/javac/.classes.list /usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/control/build/bsd-i586/bin/java - classpath ../../../tools/CompileProperties CompileProperties ../../../../src/share/classes/com/sun/tools/javac/ resources/compiler.properties /usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/control/ build/bsd-i586/gensrc/com/sun/tools/javac/resources/compiler.java Error: could not find libjava.so Error: could not find Java 2 Runtime Environment. gmake[6]: *** [/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/control/build/bsd-i586/ gensrc/com/sun/tools/javac/resources/compiler.java] Error 2 gmake[6]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make/sun/ javac/javac' gmake[5]: *** [optimized] Error 2 gmake[5]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make/sun/ javac/javac' gmake[4]: *** [all] Error 1 gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make/sun/ javac' gmake[3]: *** [all] Error 2 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make/ java/javac' gmake[2]: *** [all] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make/java' gmake[1]: *** [all] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/j2se/make' gmake: *** [j2se-build] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /usr/ports/java/jdk15. # a find shows: # find / -name libjava.so -print /usr/local/linux-sun-jdk1.4.2/jre/lib/i386/libjava.so /usr/ports/java/jdk15/work/control/build/bsd-i586/lib/i386/libjava.so /usr/ports/java/linux-sun-jdk14/work/j2sdk1.4.2_10/jre/lib/i386/ libjava.so # Google showed various issues none of them related to building and installing. thanks for any ideas Chad --- Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC Your Web App and Email hosting provider chad at shire.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 02:07:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C258516A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 02:07:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from ext-gw.lemis.com (ext-gw.lemis.com [150.101.14.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DDF443D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 02:07:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from wantadilla.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.135]) by ext-gw.lemis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72CCE131DF7; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:37:24 +1030 (CST) Received: by wantadilla.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 4B05E85C29; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:37:24 +1030 (CST) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:37:24 +1030 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: "Michael W. Lucas" Message-ID: <20060112020724.GK73071@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <20060109195342.GA35789@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> <736C118F-A6DD-4476-9437-935C43A22771@submonkey.net> <20060110222616.GA45029@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> <20060110234752.GO73071@wantadilla.lemis.com> <43C49EC7.9020003@daleco.biz> <20060111142246.GA50712@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> <20060111231355.GA73071@wantadilla.lemis.com> <20060111233023.GA54907@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NiDZvZUadYKQfYjZ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060111233023.GA54907@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 VoIP: sip:0871270137@sip.internode.on.net WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: replacement for Acrobat Professional? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 02:07:27 -0000 --NiDZvZUadYKQfYjZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wednesday, 11 January 2006 at 18:30:24 -0500, Michael W. Lucas wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 09:43:55AM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: >> *sigh* Yet Another Undocumented Program. "README" is 92 lines long, >> half of which deals with installation issues. I'll look later. > > It has a minimal GUI with some usable stuff for what I wanted. >>> But OpenOffice's PDF export is far easier for >>> preparing PDFs in general. >> >> And ghostscript is even easier. > > If, say, you're the sort of guy who writes entire books in > troff/mdoc/etc. :-) Even if you're not. > From what I know of how you work, I imagine that flpsed would not be > very helpful. Not for that kind of work. But I frequently get PDFs to comment on, and it would be nice to be able to do so without looking like the poor kid on the block who can't afford proper tools. >> I thought your original requirement was to mark up existing PDFs, >> and it still sounds like a good idea for that. > > That is the requirement: they send me the final PDFs with the page > layouts all done, and their comments in the margins. I go through and > make my comments direct in the document, and then they have someone go > through and rearrange according to my comments on their comments, > strip out everyone's comments, and send it to the printer. > > Scary? Yes. Terrifying, actually. But more and more web presses > speak PDF. It could be worse; they *could* speak only MS .doc... Indeed. I suppose the key here is that somebody tidies up what you send back, so ultimately it's *their* fault when they make a mess of it :-) > And hey, I imagine that *you* of all people would understand dealing > with publishers and printers. :-) Tell me about it. At least O'Reilly allowed me to submit CFBSD in PDF form. All layout errors are my own :-) Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address and phone numbers. --NiDZvZUadYKQfYjZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDxbncIubykFB6QiMRApiAAJ4tevvoUaejrN3T6YnwPN2HdCuQRQCdH7jV a3SZNkZS8xLU9rr6ZY1hh90= =A3fo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NiDZvZUadYKQfYjZ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 02:16:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17F8316A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 02:16:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from wolf.pjkh.com (wolf.pjkh.com [66.228.196.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD5CF43D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 02:16:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wolf.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53AB91729F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:16:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from wolf.pjkh.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (wolf.pjkh.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 40451-01 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:16:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by wolf.pjkh.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B797617150; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:16:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wolf.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B26B21711F for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:16:16 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:16:16 -0800 (PST) From: Philip Hallstrom To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060111181516.H40477@wolf.pjkh.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at pjkh.com Cc: Subject: Upgrading a remote box from 5.3 to 6-stable.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 02:16:23 -0000 Hi all - I recently got a leased server that's running 5.3. It's in Texas. I'm in Washington. I want to upgrade it to 6-STABLE. In the update docs it says that "when doing a major release upgrade, it is required that you boot into single user mode to do the installworld." Which obviously is a problem. And I find it hard to believe it's really necessary as this is going to be an issue for a lot of people. Is this similar to the old recommendation of doing this "unless your system is relatively quiet"? I also read about needing to build a kernel with COMPAT_FREEBSD5 in order for the new kernel to boot and be able to installworld. Anything else? And anyone know if the boot into single user mode is really necessary? Can't really test it on my remote box.... Thanks! -philip From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 03:13:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AD0D16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 03:13:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beastie@mra.co.id) Received: from mx3.mra.co.id (mx3.mra.co.id [202.51.30.78]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DCCF43D55 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 03:13:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beastie@mra.co.id) Received: from localhost (localhost.mra.co.id [127.0.0.1]) by mx3.mra.co.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40A7730FB3 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:06:40 +0700 (WIT) Received: from mx3.mra.co.id ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx3.mra.co.id [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 64010-07 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:06:40 +0700 (WIT) Received: from mailbox.mra.co.id (unknown [172.16.0.225]) by mx3.mra.co.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0704230F90 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:06:40 +0700 (WIT) Received: from [172.16.0.228] (unknown [172.16.0.228]) by mailbox.mra.co.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3326A34E69 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:01:35 +0700 (WIT) Message-ID: <43C5CC81.6060104@mra.co.id> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:26:57 +0700 From: Beastie User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051229 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mra.co.id Subject: freeradius freebsd-6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 03:13:49 -0000 Dear List. I try to running freeradius 1.0.5 on FreeBSD-6.0 Stable. freeradius install from latest port, installation was successfull. but i can't see the server is running and working. ps ax | grep radius or netsat -ta | grep radius came with no result, after starting service from rc startup file provided or via command line tools radiusd. this is my radiusd -X beastie# radiusd -X Starting - reading configuration files ... reread_config: reading radiusd.conf Config: including file: /usr/local/etc/raddb/proxy.conf Config: including file: /usr/local/etc/raddb/clients.conf Config: including file: /usr/local/etc/raddb/snmp.conf Config: including file: /usr/local/etc/raddb/eap.conf Config: including file: /usr/local/etc/raddb/sql.conf main: prefix = "/usr/local" main: localstatedir = "/var" main: logdir = "/var/log" main: libdir = "/usr/local/lib" main: radacctdir = "/var/log/radacct" main: hostname_lookups = no main: max_request_time = 30 main: cleanup_delay = 5 main: max_requests = 1024 main: delete_blocked_requests = 0 main: port = 0 main: allow_core_dumps = no main: log_stripped_names = no main: log_file = "/var/log/radius.log" main: log_auth = no main: log_auth_badpass = no main: log_auth_goodpass = no main: pidfile = "/var/run/radiusd/radiusd.pid" main: user = "nobody" main: group = "shadow" main: usercollide = no main: lower_user = "no" main: lower_pass = "no" main: nospace_user = "no" main: nospace_pass = "no" main: checkrad = "/usr/local/sbin/checkrad" main: proxy_requests = yes proxy: retry_delay = 5 proxy: retry_count = 3 proxy: synchronous = no proxy: default_fallback = yes proxy: dead_time = 120 proxy: post_proxy_authorize = yes proxy: wake_all_if_all_dead = no security: max_attributes = 200 security: reject_delay = 1 security: status_server = no main: debug_level = 0 read_config_files: reading dictionary read_config_files: reading naslist Using deprecated naslist file. Support for this will go away soon. read_config_files: reading clients Is there anyone can help me to fix this ? regards reza From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 03:40:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E4C916A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 03:40:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from S3.cableone.net (s3.cableone.net [24.116.0.229]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 712CA43D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 03:40:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.velox@vvelox.net) Received: from vixen42.vulpes (unverified [24.119.122.41]) by S3.cableone.net (CableOne SMTP Service S3) with ESMTP id 42682818 for multiple; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:05:18 -0700 Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:48:00 -0600 From: Vulpes Velox To: Chris Whitehouse Message-ID: <20060111214800.16799a02@vixen42.vulpes> In-Reply-To: <43BECD52.3090909@childeric.freeserve.co.uk> References: <200601051450.k05EoRmT002862@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk> <43BECD52.3090909@childeric.freeserve.co.uk> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.100 (GTK+ 2.8.9; i386-portbld-freebsd5.4) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-NotAscii: charset=us-ascii X-IP-stats: Incoming Last 1, First 239, in=404, out=0, spam=0 X-External-IP: 24.119.122.41 X-Abuse-Info: Send abuse complaints to abuse@cableone.net Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Imran Imtiaz Subject: Re: wirless ap detection utility X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 03:40:50 -0000 On Fri, 06 Jan 2006 20:04:34 +0000 Chris Whitehouse wrote: > Imran Imtiaz wrote: > > which is the best wireless ap detection and signal strength > > utility cause i have installed bsd-aitool and used its utility > > dstumber which gives me the following error error: unable to > > ioctl device socket: Operation now in progress so is there any > > other utility for this?? > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > I think net-mgmt/kismet and net/wistumbler2 do this. Well if you have the option of upgrading to releng_6, I would suggest that. ifconfig scan and ifconfig list scan are handy. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 03:42:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 247CB16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 03:42:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from coredumped@mail.ru) Received: from f9.mail.ru (f9.mail.ru [194.67.57.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8772643D48 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 03:42:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from coredumped@mail.ru) Received: from mail by f9.mail.ru with local id 1EwtLl-000IPw-00; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 06:42:09 +0300 Received: from [83.237.44.78] by koi.mail.ru with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 06:42:09 +0300 From: Core Dumped To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: mPOP Web-Mail 2.19 X-Originating-IP: 192.168.1.2 via proxy [83.237.44.78] Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 06:42:09 +0300 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: Cc: Maksim Yevmenkin Subject: kbdmux: unable to work with dual keyboard X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Core Dumped List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 03:42:11 -0000 hi, guys! I have: 1. FreeBSD coredumped.local 6.0-STABLE FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE #1: Wed Jan 11 00:31:00 MSK 2006 root@coredumped.local:/add/ftp/pub/FreeBSD/STABLE/src/sys/i386/compile/my2 i386 2. I have usb BTC 8190URF cordless kbd&mice: Jan 12 06:04:32 coredumped kernel: ukbd0: BTC USB Multimedia Cordless Kit, rev 1.10/1.70, addr 2, iclass 3/1 Jan 12 06:04:32 coredumped kernel: kbd2 at ukbd0 Jan 12 06:04:32 coredumped kernel: uhid0: BTC USB Multimedia Cordless Kit, rev 1.10/1.70, addr 2, iclass 3/1 3. shell script (from man kbdcontrol): kbdcontrol -K < /dev/console kbdcontrol -a /dev/ukbd0 < /dev/kbdmux0 kbdcontrol -a /dev/atkbd0 < /dev/kbdmux0 kbdcontrol -k /dev/kbdmux0 < /dev/console 4. Output of the script: root@coredumped:/add/home/coredumped/tmp$cat mmm.log + kbdcontrol -K kbd0 atkbd0, type:AT 101/102 (2) + kbdcontrol -a /dev/ukbd0 kbdcontrol: unable to (un)mux the keyboard: Invalid argument kbd1 kbdmux0, type:AT 101/102 (2) + kbdcontrol -a /dev/atkbd0 kbdcontrol: unable to (un)mux the keyboard: Invalid argument kbd1 kbdmux0, type:AT 101/102 (2) + kbdcontrol -k /dev/kbdmux0 kbd1 kbdmux0, type:AT 101/102 (2) Question: In result I am unable to use two keyboards. Without kbdmux I can use only keyboard in one time. Thank you! Eugeny. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 05:06:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED78F16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 05:06:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jfalconer@puc.edu) Received: from ecf.puc.edu (ecf2.puc.edu [12.16.216.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C72E43D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 05:06:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jfalconer@puc.edu) Received: from localhost (jfalconer@localhost) by ecf.puc.edu (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id k0C56Ba01772 for ; Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:06:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:06:11 -0800 (PST) From: Jon Falconer To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Subject: HP NetRAID 1Si trouble X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 05:06:19 -0000 Hi Everyone, I'm trying to recycle an old HP NetServer LC2000r P3/733 with 256MB RAM. It's been running MS Win2K for several years with no problems, but has become too slow for that task. I need to setup an email server for faculty/staff/students to do authenticated sending of email, seemed a perfect fit. So I started installing FreeBSD 6.0-Release like I've done many times before. After committing the changes, newfs claims to have succeeded for all partitions. But while extracting the install files it does not make the usual progress and fails with "Write failure on transfer! (wrote -1 bytes of 1425408 bytes)". Pressing alt-F2 shows the following messages: /stand/cpio: invalid header: checksum error /stand/cpio: warning: skipped 1024 bytes of junk /stand:cpio: :No such file or directory ... ... /stand/gunzip: : invalid stored block lengths /stand/cpio: premature end of file I've installed 6.0-Release on several other computers with this same CD so I think the CD is good. The system is booting ok from the CD so I would think that the CD drive is ok. I've updated the firmware on the 1Si card from F.02.05 to F.02.09, the latest I could find on HP's web site. I tried to install FBSD 5.4-Release with the same results. I ran a memory test, and it made three passes of eleven different test with no problems found. I installed 5.4-Release on an HP lp1000r with a NetRAID controller several months ago and it is working fine. I've run out of ideas of what to try next. Does anyone else have any suggestions? Thanks for your time, Jon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 06:50:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA14816A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 06:50:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from speechpro.com (speech-tech-2.ip.PeterStar.net [81.3.190.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E79843D46 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 06:50:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from sysadm.stc ([192.168.2.26]) by s1.stc with esmtp (Exim 4.53 (FreeBSD)) id 1EwwHf-000Hml-2E for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:50:07 +0300 Received: from localhost.stc ([127.0.0.1] helo=sysadm.stc) by sysadm.stc with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1EwwHC-000FQ0-Ql for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:49:38 +0300 Received: (from igorr@localhost) by sysadm.stc (8.13.4/8.13.3/Submit) id k0C6ncWP059271 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:49:38 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from igorr) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:49:38 +0300 From: Igor Robul To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060112064938.GA52424@sysadm.stc> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archived: Yes Subject: Re: HP NetRAID 1Si trouble X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 06:50:10 -0000 On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 09:06:11PM -0800, Jon Falconer wrote: > I've run out of ideas of what to try next. Does anyone else have any > suggestions? Hi, check memory and/or power supply, in ideal world you need replace both. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 06:57:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7539C16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 06:57:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sasa@stupar.homelinux.net) Received: from avs1.arnes.si (avs1.arnes.si [193.2.1.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D161843D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 06:57:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sasa@stupar.homelinux.net) Received: from localhost (avs1.arnes.si [193.2.1.74]) by avs1.arnes.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B09B36AA2B; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 07:57:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from avs1.arnes.si ([193.2.1.74]) by localhost (avs1.arnes.si [193.2.1.74]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 20783-20; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 07:57:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from xmail.homelinux.net (cmb16-74.dial-up.arnes.si [194.249.51.74]) by avs1.arnes.si (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8451136AA21; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 07:57:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.10.249] (master.workgroup [192.168.10.249]) (authenticated bits=0) by xmail.homelinux.net (8.13.5/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k0C6v0AA027575; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 07:57:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sasa@stupar.homelinux.net) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 07:57:04 +0100 From: Sasa Stupar To: vocativus , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <1965019375.20060111213647@interia.pl> References: <1965019375.20060111213647@interia.pl> X-Mailer: Mulberry/3.1.6 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.87.1, clamav-milter version 0.87 on mig29.workgroup X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at arnes.si Cc: Subject: Re: Pooomooocyyyy ;( X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 06:57:05 -0000 --On 11. januar 2006 21:36 +0100 vocativus wrote: > Witam! > > > Mam du=BFy problem z FreeBSD. Mianowicie... ?ci=B9g=B3em sobie system ze > strony www.freebsd.org wypali=B3em na 2 p=B3ytach CD i zainstalowa=B3em. > Wszystko dobrze chodzi=B3o... do czasu a=BF zmieni=B3em komputer tzn. = dysk > twardy, RAM i nagrywarke mam ze starego. Moja stara konfiguracja: > > P=B3yta g=B3. ASrock k7s8x, > 384MB RAM, > GeForce 2 MX 400, > Dyski twarde: Western Digital 40 GB (ATA 133), i Samsung 60GB (ATA 133). > Procesor: Duron 1400 > Karta sieciowa - SIS 10/100 zintegrowana z p=B3yt=B9 g=B3=F3wn=B9 > Karta d?wi=EAkowa - AC 97 <- system jej nie wykrywa=B3 poprawnie > > Na powy=BFszym sprz=EAcie system pracowa=B3 bezb=B3=EAdnie, z wyj=B9tkiem > wspomnianej karty d?wi=EAkowej. > > > Moja obecna konfiguracja: > > P=B3. g=B3=F3wna: 939NF4G - SATA2 > Procesor: AMD Athlon 64 3200+ venice socket 939 > Karta graficzna - zintegrowana z p=B3yt=B9 g=B3=F3wn=B9 - GeForce 6100 - = pami=EA=E6 > 128MB > Karta sieciowa - zintegrowana z p=B3yt=B9 g=B3=F3wn=B9 - Realtek PHY = RTL8201CL > Karta d?wi=EAkowa - Realtek ALC850 7.1channel AC'97 audio codec > RAM - 768MB (128 zarezerwowane dla karty graficznej wi=EAc dost=EApne = jest > 640MB RAM) > Wersja BIOS-u - P1.30 > > > I wzi=B9=B3em wyczyszczony dysk (bez jakichkolwiek partycji) = pod=B3=B9czony > jako jedyny dysk, po wybraniu opcji default boot, wybraniu opcji > standard, naci?ni=EAciu ok w oknie gdzie pisze co? o fdisk-u, wybraniu > dysku - w moim przypadku ad0 wy?wietla sie komunikat: > > > > Warning: A geometry of 77545/16/63 for ad0 is incorrect. Using a more > likely geometry. If this geometry is incorrect or you are unsure as to > whether or not it's correct, please consult the Hardware Guide in the > Documentation submenu or use the (G)eometry command to change it now > > Remember: you need to enter whatever your BIOS thinks the geometry is! > For IDE it's what yoy were told in the BIOS setup. For SCSI, it's the > translation mode your controller is using. Do NOT use a "physical > geometry" > > > > I nic da=B3em na ok, rozplanowa=B3em partycje da=B3em na instaluj i = pojawi=B3 > mi si=EA komunikat o b=B3=EAdzie, =BFe nie mo=BFna zapisa=E6 danych na = dysk i na > tym koniec. > > Pr=F3bowa=B3em zainstalowa=E6 FreeBSD w wersji 5.4 (i386), 6.0 (i386), = 6.0 > (AMD 64) i ci=B9gle si=EA pojawia ten komunikat. > > Je?li to Was pocieszy, to linux SuSE nie wykry=B3 mi wog=F3le =BFadnego > sprz=EAtu, za wyj=B9tkiem drukarki. Czy ja mam na tyle nietypow=B9 > konfiguracje, =BFe =BFaden linux nie jest w stanie prawid=B3owo = rozpozna=E6 > mojego sprz=EAtu??? > > Nie by=B3oby takiego problemu, gdyby nie to, =BFe musze mie=E6 linuxa, bo > chodz=EA do liceum na profil matematyczno - fizyczno - informatyczny i > linuxa musze mie=E6... Pr=EAdzej te=BF go mia=B3em zainstalowanego, ale > g=B3=F3wnie do zabawy, w celu poznania czego? innego opr=F3cz windowsa. I > musze powiedzie=E6, =BFe FreeBSD to, jak dot=B9d najlepszy linux, z jakim > si=EA spotka=B3em. Jego instalacja jest z leksza dziwna, ale z 23 - > stronicow=B9 instrukcj=B9 instalacji nie ma najmniejszego problemu. > FreeBSD zaskoczy=B3 mnie g=B3=F3wnie prostot=B9 i niemal=BFe = ca=B3kowit=B9 > automatyzacj=B9 instalacji program=F3w, np. poprzez porty. To doskona=B3e > rozwi=B9zanie. I w=B3a?nie dlatego wybra=B3em FreeBSD - jest = funkcjonalny, > na tych dw=F3ch p=B3ytach jest wi=EAcej oprogramowania ni=BF w innych > dystrybucjach. Jest =B3atwy w obs=B3ude, chocia=BF musze przyzna=E6, =BFe > pocz=B9tki by=B3y tragiczne... ale to chyba normalne. Grunt to sie > przyzwyczai=E6 :) > > > Dlatego prosze Was o pomoc... kompletnie nie wiem co robi=E6... > pooomooocyyyyyyyyy ;( > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > Jedyny taki CZAT! >>> http://link.interia.pl/f18ee > Please write in english if you want any help. --=20 Sasa Stupar From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 07:12:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2166C16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 07:12:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: from mail.el.net (mail.el.net [68.165.89.91]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 875C243D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 07:12:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: (qmail 84723 invoked by uid 1008); 12 Jan 2006 07:13:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.el.net) (127.0.0.1) by mail.el.net with SMTP; 12 Jan 2006 07:13:41 -0000 Received: from 24.90.33.115 (SquirrelMail authenticated user kalin@el.net) by mail.el.net with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 02:13:41 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <59540.24.90.33.115.1137050021.squirrel@mail.el.net> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 02:13:41 -0500 (EST) From: "kalin mintchev" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: missing /dev/dsp X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 07:12:46 -0000 hi all.. i sent my t30 to ibm to replace a not working ram slot and i got it back in less then 48 hrs. pretty good. except the /dev/dsp is missing. i don't see any cards in the dmesg but i know that the audio card is "SoundBlaster compatible". my system is 5.4 and according to the handbook devfs should figure it out - i haven't had to do this before... a have the audio enabled in the kernel... pcm... any ideas why is the dsp missing? i think they did bios upgrade - is that what screwed it up? thanks... -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 07:20:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 234D016A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 07:20:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from speechpro.com (speech-tech-2.ip.PeterStar.net [81.3.190.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A788C43D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 07:20:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from sysadm.stc ([192.168.2.26]) by s1.stc with esmtp (Exim 4.53 (FreeBSD)) id 1Ewwl5-000JFc-At for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:20:31 +0300 Received: from localhost.stc ([127.0.0.1] helo=sysadm.stc) by sysadm.stc with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1Ewwkd-000FRc-2b for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:20:03 +0300 Received: (from igorr@localhost) by sysadm.stc (8.13.4/8.13.3/Submit) id k0C7K3mV059371 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:20:03 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from igorr) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:20:03 +0300 From: Igor Robul To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060112072003.GB52424@sysadm.stc> References: <1965019375.20060111213647@interia.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archived: Yes Subject: Re: Pooomooocyyyy ;( X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 07:20:33 -0000 On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 07:57:04AM +0100, Sasa Stupar wrote: > > Please write in english if you want any help. There are enought Polish users of FreeBSD who can give more helpful answer than you. If you cant give meaningful answer, why asnwer at all? To original poster, unfortunately I cannot understand most of your message, but you can ignore warning about disk geometry, at least I see this message every time I install FreeBSD on current hardware. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 08:21:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C32716A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 08:21:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wash@wananchi.com) Received: from ns2.wananchi.com (ns2.wananchi.com [62.8.64.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC62B43D72 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 08:21:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wash@wananchi.com) Received: from wash by ns2.wananchi.com with local (Exim 4.60 #0 (FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE)) id 1Ewxhd-0003uj-GB by authid for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:21:01 +0300 Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:21:01 +0300 From: Odhiambo Washington To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060112082101.GL45938@ns2.wananchi.com> Mail-Followup-To: Odhiambo Washington , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <43C5CC81.6060104@mra.co.id> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43C5CC81.6060104@mra.co.id> X-Disclaimer: Any views expressed in this message, where not explicitly attributed otherwise, are mine alone!. X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.11 (2005-09-15) X-Designation: Systems Administrator, Wananchi Online Ltd. X-Location: Nairobi, KE, East Africa. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Subject: Re: freeradius freebsd-6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 08:21:14 -0000 * On 12/01/06 10:26 +0700, Beastie wrote: > Dear List. > > I try to running freeradius 1.0.5 on FreeBSD-6.0 Stable. > freeradius install from latest port, installation was successfull. > but i can't see the server is running and working. > ps ax | grep radius or netsat -ta | grep radius came with no result, > after starting service from rc startup file provided or via command line > tools radiusd. Maybe the startup script wants you to add an entry in /etc/rc.conf if it relies on the rcNG. Read that script and see what is inside. http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html DISCLAIMER: See http://www.wananchi.com/bms/terms.php -- +======================================================================+ |\ _,,,---,,_ | Odhiambo Washington Zzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ | Wananchi Online Ltd. www.wananchi.com |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-'| Tel: +254 20 313985-9 +254 20 313922 '---''(_/--' `-'\_) | GSM: +254 722 743223 +254 733 744121 +======================================================================+ "His great aim was to escape from civilization, and, as soon as he had money, he went to Southern California." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 08:43:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66EB716A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 08:43:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.web-strider.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62ACC43D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 08:43:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from tedwin2k (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.11.1/8.11.1) with SMTP id k0C8lDP80856; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 00:47:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: , Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 00:43:39 -0800 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20060111131116.66916.qmail@web33313.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: Sparc vs i386 architecture X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 08:43:44 -0000 >-----Original Message----- >From: Danial Thom [mailto:danial_thom@yahoo.com] >Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2006 5:11 AM >To: Ted Mittelstaedt; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: RE: Sparc vs i386 architecture > > > > >--- Ted Mittelstaedt >wrote: > >> >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On >> Behalf Of Danial Thom >> >Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 5:28 AM >> >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> >Subject: RE: Sparc vs i386 architecture >> > >> > >> > >> > >> >--- Ted Mittelstaedt >> >wrote: >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >> >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> >> >> >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On >> >> Behalf Of Gerard Seibert >> >> >Sent: Sunday, January 08, 2006 7:02 AM >> >> >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> >> >Subject: Re: Sparc vs i386 architecture >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >Danial Thom >> >> > >> >> >> Frankly, people who spend $9000. worth of >> >> time >> >> >> dicking around with some old piece of >> junk >> >> to >> >> >> avoid buying a $400. computer crack me >> up. >> >> :) >> >> > >> >> >Yes, it is amassing. I have a friend who >> has >> >> spent thousands of dollars >> >> >keeping his old car running. He could have >> >> purchased a new one with a >> >> >new warranty, etc. and have saved all that >> >> money, but he refused. For >> >> >some individuals, the challenge is the real >> >> thrill that they crave. >> >> > >> >> >> >> That is an interesting, if very inaccurate, >> >> analogy, and as a car guy >> >> that does my own wrenching, let me tell you >> >> why. >> >> >> >> Computer gear every year gets cheaper and >> >> faster and better. Cars >> >> by contrast, have not improved much over the >> >> last 20 years - unless you >> >> count larger cupholders as an improvement - >> and >> >> espically they haven't >> >> changed at all over the last 10. Ever since >> >> EFI and airbags became >> >> standard on vehicles there just haven't been >> >> any compelling or significant >> >> improvements. In fact for many models, the >> >> engine designs themselves >> >> are the same as 20 years ago. For example >> the >> >> 2.4 Turbo used in >> >> the 2006 Chrysler PT Cruiser went into >> >> production in 1994, the 4 speed >> >> computer-controlled transmission used in >> that >> >> car went into production >> >> in 1989. Many parts for that transmission >> in >> >> fact are the same - how >> >> many computers do you know that you can use >> a >> >> 17 year old part in? >> > >> >you need to get out more, Ted, if you think >> cars >> >haven't improved much in 20 years. I know you >> >can't afford a BMW or Mercedes, but you can >> test >> >drive them for free if you put on a nice suit. >> >Drive a '95 BMW and a 2005 and you'll see >> there >> >are huge differences in power, handling, >> brakes >> >and a whole lot of stuff you can't see, not to >> >mention safety. Anti-skid brakes were a joke >> when >> >they first came out; now I can stop on a dime. >> >Traction control actually works now. >> > >> >> There have been improvements in suspension - >> however >> suspension is largely a preference thing. You >> for example probably would think the suspension >> tuning I prefer is way too harsh, I by contrast >> would >> probably think the suspension in a new BMW or >> Mercedes that you prefer feels like a speedboat >> wallowing in the river. As for brakes, a lot >> of the >> so-called "improvement" in stopping power in >> brakes >> is achieved by larger rotors - and to get these >> >> without making the wheel bigger and heavier you >> have to make the tire low profile - which means >> a >> more expensive tire, and a lot more frequent >> incidents >> of bent rims if the roads in your area have a >> lot of >> potholes (which is common on the east coast >> during the >> winter as the road salt and such destroys the >> asphalt. >> >> And safety, yes there's more airbags, and yes >> the >> bodies of cars are safer but once again, thats >> a tradeoff too. To make the car bodies safer >> the >> frame is strategicly weakened in areas to >> increase >> the "compressibility" of the body so that in a >> massive >> crash, the car folds up around you. The >> downside is >> that in low-speed 10-15Mph collisions where you >> would >> survive them in a less compressible body >> anyway, now the >> car has to be totaled out because the body >> simply folds >> up if it's barely tapped. Once more your >> getting >> a small increase in survivability by making >> everyone else have a lot more expensive-to-fix >> car, >> which drives up insurance rates. That might be >> agreeable until you look at the percentage of >> the >> major collisions and discover most of them were >> caused >> by drunks, who possibly the society as a whole >> would >> be better off if the drunk had died in the >> accident >> instead of being saved by the air bags. (since >> quite often the non-drunk people in these kinds >> of >> collisions are killed while the drunks survive, >> due to their bodies being more relaxed) >> >> Most of what your seeing as improvements are >> merely >> changes in the tradeoffs in automotive designs >> that >> have always existed. In the olden days, people >> cared more about lower lifetime maintainence >> costs, >> so manufacturers were more apt to choose a >> simpler >> and more bullet proof design, today by contrast >> people view cars as disposable if they go >> wrong, >> so manufacturers are more apt to choose the >> complex >> and less-bullet proof design if it creates some >> minor feature that they think will help them >> sell >> a car. >> >> The only real new things that have come down >> the >> pike as it were is production hybrid >> powertrains, >> but the only thing that made those a reality is >> massive >> government subsidies. 20 years ago if we had >> the same >> government subsidies in place for hybrids, we >> would >> have had them then. > >The ability of a car to handle perfectly at >100Mph is more than just a minor improvement, >unless you just use a car to take you to the >train station or to the market. > Actually, it's a pure waste of money, at least in the US, since no public roads have 100Mph speed limits and chances of driving that fast with any regularity are about nil. (unless you live out in the boondocks, in which case your joy toy is gonna get it's undercarriage torn off by the dirt road you have to go on.) You can, with the right engineering, make the car handle perfectly at 200Mph too. Human reflexes are plenty fast enough to deal with inputs happening at these speeds, Indy car drivers do it all the time. But, until the speed limts are raised, nobody can use that extra engineering, so your paying money for nothing. Although, I should say that nobody is actually using the things to GO 100Mph. I'm sure there's plenty of guys out there who are using ownership of a car capabable of going 100Mph as a sex aid. Considering the greying of America and increased sales of certain pharmaceuticals which spammers build their businesses on, I guess some of them would rather get horny thinking about the 100Mph screamer out in the garage that they can't use, then thinking about the silver pills in the medicine cabinet. >The problem with your arguments is that the same >stupid logic can be applied to computers. If your >only use for a computer is to do email and light >browsing, then there is no difference between >today's computers and one that is 5 years old. > Actually, that stupid logic WILL be applied to computers EVENTUALLY. It took almost a century of auto production to reach the areas of diminishing returns, whereas the computer market is just a baby, comparatively. And in fact in some cases it is already. Take for example your garden variety ipod. The ipod is a specialized computer that is very limited in what it can do. Any laptop computer out there can kick the stuffing out of the ipod in terms of storage, superiority of interface, ability to organize your music, as well as sound quality (if you have a decent sound card in it, of course) and is just as portable. But, the ipod rules in the portable music market because it's a cheaper, stripped down, stunted little computer. In other words, ipod purchasers have decided that "their only use for a music computer" is to play mp3's, so they are happy to take a nasty little white box that has a CPU that's on par with a 5 year old desktop computer, and is functionally equivalent to a 5 year old computer running winamp. >Dt > >__________________________________________________ >Do You Yahoo!? >Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around >http://mail.yahoo.com > >-- >No virus found in this incoming message. >Checked by AVG Free Edition. >Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/226 - Release >Date: 1/10/2006 > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 09:16:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA30B16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:16:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beastie@mra.co.id) Received: from mx3.mra.co.id (mx3.mra.co.id [202.51.30.78]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ADFE43D58 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:16:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from beastie@mra.co.id) Received: from localhost (localhost.mra.co.id [127.0.0.1]) by mx3.mra.co.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C9B730FE1; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:44:33 +0700 (WIT) Received: from mx3.mra.co.id ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mx3.mra.co.id [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 66756-28; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:44:33 +0700 (WIT) Received: from mailbox.mra.co.id (unknown [172.16.0.225]) by mx3.mra.co.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00BE630FDA; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:44:33 +0700 (WIT) Received: from [172.16.0.228] (unknown [172.16.0.228]) by mailbox.mra.co.id (Postfix) with ESMTP id A416434E5E; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:39:26 +0700 (WIT) Message-ID: <43C61BB5.3030003@mra.co.id> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:04:53 +0700 From: Beastie User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051229 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Odhiambo Washington References: <43C5CC81.6060104@mra.co.id> <20060112082101.GL45938@ns2.wananchi.com> In-Reply-To: <20060112082101.GL45938@ns2.wananchi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at mra.co.id Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freeradius freebsd-6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:16:33 -0000 Odhiambo Washington wrote: >* On 12/01/06 10:26 +0700, Beastie wrote: > > >>Dear List. >> >>I try to running freeradius 1.0.5 on FreeBSD-6.0 Stable. >>freeradius install from latest port, installation was successfull. >>but i can't see the server is running and working. >>ps ax | grep radius or netsat -ta | grep radius came with no result, >>after starting service from rc startup file provided or via command line >>tools radiusd. >> >> > >Maybe the startup script wants you to add an entry in /etc/rc.conf if >it relies on the rcNG. >Read that script and see what is inside. > > >http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html > >DISCLAIMER: See http://www.wananchi.com/bms/terms.php > >-- >+======================================================================+ > |\ _,,,---,,_ | Odhiambo Washington >Zzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ | Wananchi Online Ltd. www.wananchi.com > |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-'| Tel: +254 20 313985-9 +254 20 313922 > '---''(_/--' `-'\_) | GSM: +254 722 743223 +254 733 744121 >+======================================================================+ > >"His great aim was to escape from civilization, and, as soon as he had >money, he went to Southern California." >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > Thanks... this my rc.conf beastie# cat /etc/rc.conf | grep radius radiusd_enable="YES" but it still not running.. regards reza From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 09:46:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F7AF16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:46:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from smtp3.suscom.net (smtp3.suscom.net [64.78.119.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C12743D46 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:46:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.suscom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id E630F210135 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 04:46:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp3.suscom.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.suscom.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 29953-01-4 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 04:45:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from seibercom.net (ip148.217.susc.suscom.net [216.45.217.148]) by smtp3.suscom.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D841210134 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 04:45:54 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (budman [192.168.0.2]) by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0C9jr4N026056 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 04:45:54 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 04:45:55 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: gerard@seibercom.net Organization: Seibercom.net In-Reply-To: <00B61835-9B73-4058-ABDF-888B522B1A97@u.washington.edu> References: <20060111203616.46021.qmail@web33314.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <00B61835-9B73-4058-ABDF-888B522B1A97@u.washington.edu> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20060112043142.9EA6.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.24.01 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1238/Wed Jan 11 05:19:06 2006 on seibercom.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at suscom.net Subject: Re: Dual Core vs HyperThreading vs Dual CPU X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:46:03 -0000 Garrett Cooper > No kidding. But I doubt the competence of people that buy computers =20 > from big name manufacturers, unless they bought it maybe for server =20 > applications, large scale deployment of machines, etc. Gotta love =20 > their little Flash graphics with the "balls" representing "bits", =20 > just hopping along the CPU/cores... lol. > -Garrett =46rom a strictly marketing/advertising sense, it is a rather useful tool. Honestly, they could have posted a 5000 word white paper detailing the specs and performance gains versus none hyper-threaded or dual cored PCs, but how many actual potential buyers would have actually read or understood it. That little visual aid they developed immediately attracts a potential buyers attention. I do question why you make the statement, "I doubt the competence of people that buy computers from big name manufacturers" however. I happen to own two Dell computers, along with an old Compag (my first). In the past ten years or so, I have purchased at least 6 personal PC's and recommended dozens more to my friends. At least when buying from a well kno= wn manufacturer, the odds are that they will be around if something goes wrong with the unit. I have know individuals who have purchased from lesser known manufacturers only to discover that they were no longer in business in a year or two. I look for stability in the companies I do business with as well as the units I purchase. I personally find your statement somewhat insulting. --=20 Gerard Seibert gerard@seibercom.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 09:57:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A63BF16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:57:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mipam@ux11.ltcm.net) Received: from ux11.ltcm.net (213-84-197-131.adsl.xs4all.nl [213.84.197.131]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0176E43D46 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:57:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mipam@ux11.ltcm.net) Received: from ux11.ltcm.net (mipam@localhost.ltcm.net [IPv6:::1]) by ux11.ltcm.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/UX11TT) with ESMTP id k0C9vRNh030588 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:57:27 +0100 (MET) Received: from localhost (mipam@localhost) by ux11.ltcm.net (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) with ESMTP id k0C9vQvV023896 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:57:26 +0100 (MET) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:57:25 +0100 (MET) From: Mipam To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Subject: proxy check port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:57:30 -0000 Hi All, I install the proxycheck port (ports/security/proxycheck) I wished to check whether a proxy is open. It appears there's a bug in the proxycheck program for example: proxycheck -vvv -d www.freebsd.org:80 -c chat:"GET http://www.freebsd.org/ HTTP/1.0":"HTTP/1.1 200 OK" -p hc:8080 127.0.0.1 It appears proxycheck is only sending "GET http" and omits everythings from the ":". HOwever, this : is between ""'s so it shouldn't be interpreted as the : to seperate the send string and reply string. Or am i doing something wrong here? Bye, Mipam. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 10:00:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C88916A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:00:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: from relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.182.165]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0076A43D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:00:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drew@mykitchentable.net) Received: from filter06.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (filter06.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.183.73]) by relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 483833701F3; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:00:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net ([66.133.182.165]) by filter06.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (filter06.roc.ny.frontiernet.net [66.133.183.73]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 22572-13-66; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:00:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (67-51-143-222.dsl1.elk.ca.frontiernet.net [67.51.143.222]) by relay02.roc.ny.frontiernet.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 732DA3701E3; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:00:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (unknown [192.168.1.3]) by blacklamb.mykitchentable.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90C04AE1AC; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 02:00:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <43C628AE.2060105@mykitchentable.net> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 02:00:14 -0800 From: Drew Tomlinson User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Igor Robul References: <43BDEBCB.9060000@mykitchentable.net> <20060110150905.GB1117@sysadm.stc> <43C5DEC6.8060109@mykitchentable.net> <20060112061842.GA59121@sysadm.stc> In-Reply-To: <20060112061842.GA59121@sysadm.stc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-2.3.2 (20050629) at filter06.roc.ny.frontiernet.net Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: What User Runs Startup Scripts? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:00:18 -0000 On 1/11/2006 10:18 PM Igor Robul said the following: >On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 08:44:54PM -0800, Drew Tomlinson wrote: > > >>On 1/10/2006 7:09 AM Igor Robul said the following: >> >> >>>Do you have tun0 interface on boot time? Are you activating ppp >>>manually? >>> >>> >>> >>> >>I do run openvpn and its start up script creates tun0 and tun1. No >>ppp. But the "fatal error" is "Not root". Why is ntop not root? >> >> >Does openvpn start before or after ntop? I _think_, that ntop when tries open >network device and cant do this, it "thinks" that it is not running as >root. > >Remove tun* interfaces from list of interfaces ntop is monitoring. If >problem persist then I'm wrong, if it will disappear, then you can try >reorder startup sequence, for example start openvpn before ntop. > > You are right! Starting openvpn before ntop resolves this issue. Thanks, Drew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 10:00:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC34616A420 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:00:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from crispy.beef@ntlworld.com) Received: from mta07-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (mta07-winn.ispmail.ntl.com [81.103.221.47]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7168843D55 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:00:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from crispy.beef@ntlworld.com) Received: from aamta11-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mta07-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20060112100052.FAZG15999.mta07-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamta11-winn.ispmail.ntl.com>; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:00:52 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.2] (really [82.12.81.129]) by aamta11-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20060112100052.JQLF19063.aamta11-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@[192.168.0.2]>; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:00:52 +0000 Message-ID: <43C628D2.3070500@ntlworld.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:00:50 +0000 From: Crispy Beef User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kent Stewart References: <43C540A1.7060805@ntlworld.com> <200601111059.21012.kstewart@owt.com> In-Reply-To: <200601111059.21012.kstewart@owt.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.6-RELEASE to 6.0-RELEASE... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:00:58 -0000 > There have been major changes in processes such as threads. You also > have to boot the 5.3 update in single user mode to have a kernel that > accepts the new arrangement and then install the userland. Before 5.1 > or 5.2 it didn't matter much but there was an fs change that you update > in single user mode or boot the fix disc to finish the botched update. > > You also have the problem that probably none of your ports from 4.x will > work at 6.0. This could take quite a bit of time to upgrade. One advantage is that I didn't really bother with the ports on that server, I rolled my own apps as I wasn't totally up with the ports system at the time, just seemed easier until I go the hang of it, so I probably would go for a fresh install of ports and get the latest versions of software installed that way. The server is used for web hosting so I only really need to save out a few config files for virtual hosts etc. and the email directories. It's sounding as though it might be easier just to have an hour or two of downtime late one night and do a fresh install... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 10:03:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DBA116A420 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:03:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from crispy.beef@ntlworld.com) Received: from mta08-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (mta08-winn.ispmail.ntl.com [81.103.221.48]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D7943D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:03:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from crispy.beef@ntlworld.com) Received: from aamta12-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mta08-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20060112100313.DCUH17804.mta08-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamta12-winn.ispmail.ntl.com>; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:03:13 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.2] (really [82.12.81.129]) by aamta12-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20060112100313.IZOL20369.aamta12-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@[192.168.0.2]>; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:03:13 +0000 Message-ID: <43C6295F.5040400@ntlworld.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:03:11 +0000 From: Crispy Beef User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.6-RELEASE to 6.0-RELEASE... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:03:15 -0000 fbsd_user wrote: > There is a new and faster file system which is introduced in > release-5.4. > I highly recommend that you install 6.0 from scratch and > build your old server services anew to a development box you have > personal access to. Then remove the hard drive and ship it to you > remote site and swap with your production drive. That way you get > the new file system in production and have quick fall back if things > don't work. > > There is a lot of maintenance benefits to be had from a new clean > built from scratch server. Yeah, from what I've read now and the time involved it seems as though it's going to be easier to just get 6.0 installed from scratch, plus I guess there's not going to be the possibility of old files from the previous install messing up the upgrade. New install it is. Might see if the data centre has a spare box I could mirror on for a day or so. Cheers. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 10:26:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB16E16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:26:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jkerian@gmail.com) Received: from nproxy.gmail.com (nproxy.gmail.com [64.233.182.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 188CC43D6A for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:26:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jkerian@gmail.com) Received: by nproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id q29so154593nfc for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 02:26:02 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=EnNQqzpe3T7DyG7VuTeQNm34NBg0t3H+gcHq9vPIjKBiz3fMpEr/y922tOnkM9vNPJOpRP/MC56uUukI6Xe47Uu7HXKODEkZrhuOusAyO58oNYdpdufSelmpo5s90EgeMOGT2cNZaKLyLU42x+x20aNIdPx5KSeD/h6cZqH6As8= Received: by 10.48.220.12 with SMTP id s12mr123270nfg; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 02:25:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.93.2 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 02:25:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <282b2dd90601120225x39403341mf7a01f37837791ee@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:25:55 +0900 From: Joseph Kerian To: Josh Paetzel In-Reply-To: <4dd4cddf0601110443r5e726a86t@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200601101604.55833.josh@tcbug.org> <4dd4cddf0601110443r5e726a86t@mail.gmail.com> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Slow 2d performance in X / opera / nvidia drivers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:26:15 -0000 On 1/11/06, Martin Tournoy wrote: > On 10/01/06, Josh Paetzel wrote: *many helpful attachments snipped* > > I've been having terrible 2d performance with opera (linux-opera and > > native 8.51 and 9.0) using the nvidia drivers. When I windowshade it > > and then restore it there is a sizeable delay while it redraws the > > window. If I rapidly shade and restore the window my idle CPU time > > goes to 0% and mp3 playback will occassionally skip. > > > > The problem first started when Opera 8 was released, I hoped that > > further releases would address it but so far that has not been the > > case. Any suggestions for a fix welcome. > > > > (Yes, I have been seeking support on opera.com but this feels like a > > FreeBSD mis-configuration of some sort on my end. :) > > You might try turning the twinview of, it takes up heaps of resources > on my machine, then again, your machine has 300% more RAM and > clockspeed, so it should be able to handle it fine.... > > Try using freebsd AGP, the nvidia should work better but you might > want to try it anyway... The other useful file for this might be your Xorg log. > Which window manager do you use, I noted that KDE can be really, > really slow even on newer machines (Krap Desktop Enviorment) *bites the troll* > Is this problem ONLY with opera? or with other applications to? if you > have another QT application you might want try how that runs. > Also check you QT version, maybe it's ancient? > > Did you try using both the static/shared QT versions? If not, it might > make a diffrence. I haven't had this problem at all with Opera on the ports KDE, using a far inferior nvidia card. I have had a bit of shared library wierdness, but Opera simply refused to run until I fixed that. If this is a PCI-Express card, note the discussion of 3d performance here: http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=3D59981 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 10:28:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E125E16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:28:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from anirban.adhikary@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7426443D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:28:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from anirban.adhikary@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id l1so331624nzf for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 02:28:25 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=Jb0T5jhQ2qzMpHjDBqnPnJfUP/mC+B9M+ZqEC50Z7iOkE98BqbfqUR57svj8ULZbWHVvp2YoVKAd2aRjNgItsCGiRl3HxfsHhtzQQhdmu98MW2kQQzONr6SimSPC7MoflQr148MNbXDWEWwYACR9YLWeh+zzAeEZ5VjhFcICiYI= Received: by 10.36.9.16 with SMTP id 16mr1803987nzi; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 02:28:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.220.14 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 02:28:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <71c73b070601120228y6ba83090jd47f2dae3a06e1ed@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:58:23 +0530 From: Anirban Adhikary To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: How to access of linux and windows XP desktop simaltaneously X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:28:27 -0000 Hi guys This is Anirban here.Presently my os is Windows-XP.But i want to have the entire linux desktop along with my present desktop.I am connected with an existing network.Presently i get the LINUX server access with PUTTY software. I cant use telnet or SSH type utilities.But I want that I have th= e windows and linux destop simaltaneously.How can i do this? with regards Anirban. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 10:33:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFDB916A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:33:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED9443D72 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:33:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id l1so332279nzf for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 02:33:30 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=V4u+gQAHmNGsFRng9tA/PnqFU8h98eZkU8lLYDD0MhWWRX5psw+ldVHGbAxndqWec4yEJHzcEFrBbeLz5jBz2ky3/hYR/wL6alBiLwgWQmTLx7mIL/TmWWVqQB9APdRChqI5Z1YfdXkSr6EVHqkieMp7josIJFYt6g/M3EfuXv4= Received: by 10.36.77.16 with SMTP id z16mr1810864nza; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 02:33:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.20.67 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 02:33:30 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:33:30 +0300 From: "Andrew P." To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060112043142.9EA6.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060111203616.46021.qmail@web33314.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <00B61835-9B73-4058-ABDF-888B522B1A97@u.washington.edu> <20060112043142.9EA6.GERARD@seibercom.net> Subject: Re: Dual Core vs HyperThreading vs Dual CPU X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:33:32 -0000 On 1/12/06, Gerard Seibert wrote: > Garrett Cooper > > > No kidding. But I doubt the competence of people that buy compute= rs > > from big name manufacturers, unless they bought it maybe for server > > applications, large scale deployment of machines, etc. Gotta love > > their little Flash graphics with the "balls" representing "bits", > > just hopping along the CPU/cores... lol. > > -Garrett > > From a strictly marketing/advertising sense, it is a rather useful tool. > Honestly, they could have posted a 5000 word white paper detailing the > specs and performance gains versus none hyper-threaded or dual cored PCs, > but how many actual potential buyers would have actually read or > understood it. That little visual aid they developed immediately > attracts a potential buyers attention. > > I do question why you make the statement, "I doubt the competence of > people that buy computers from big name manufacturers" however. I happen > to own two Dell computers, along with an old Compag (my first). In the > past ten years or so, I have purchased at least 6 personal PC's and > recommended dozens more to my friends. At least when buying from a well k= nown > manufacturer, the odds are that they will be around if something > goes wrong with the unit. I have know individuals who have purchased > from lesser known manufacturers only to discover that they were no > longer in business in a year or two. I look for stability in the > companies I do business with as well as the units I purchase. I > personally find your statement somewhat insulting. > > -- > Gerard Seibert > gerard@seibercom.net > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > Welcome to consumerland :-) If you buy equipment from companies, which are stable thanks to great marketing/advertising strategies (and lack of funding in all other areas, including R&D), it doesn't make you a worse or a better man at all, but it does prove for a thousandth time in a row, that those strategies are almost exclusively effective ones in the land of incompetent consumers :-) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 10:39:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE5BA16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:39:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kiffin.gish@planet.nl) Received: from post-25.mail.nl.demon.net (post-25.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CB0643D46 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:39:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kiffin.gish@planet.nl) Received: from gish.demon.nl ([83.160.27.223]:11093 helo=ZGISH) by post-25.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1Ewzrj-000P5l-8N; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:39:35 +0000 From: "Kiffin Gish" To: "'Anirban Adhikary'" , Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:39:35 +0100 Message-ID: <000101c61764$7b590d80$2101a8c0@ZGISH> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 In-reply-to: <71c73b070601120228y6ba83090jd47f2dae3a06e1ed@mail.gmail.com> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Cc: Subject: RE: How to access of linux and windows XP desktop simaltaneously X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:39:36 -0000 How about a dual-boot system? -- Kiffin Rex Gish Gouda, The Netherlands > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of > Anirban Adhikary > Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 11:28 > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: How to access of linux and windows XP desktop simaltaneously > > > Hi guys > This is Anirban here.Presently my os is Windows-XP.But i want > to have the entire linux desktop along with my present > desktop.I am connected with an existing network.Presently i > get the LINUX server access with PUTTY software. I cant use > telnet or SSH type utilities.But I want that I have the > windows and linux destop simaltaneously.How can i do this? > > with regards > Anirban. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 10:44:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18EAA16A41F; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:44:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bt@ccgis.de) Received: from sm7.simplethings.de (a15160313.alturo-server.de [217.160.128.151]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1589343D6B; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:43:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bt@ccgis.de) Received: from smm.simplethings.de ([85.88.4.201]) by sm7.simplethings.de with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ewzvs-0007ax-Ad; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:43:55 +0100 Received: from [212.79.172.180] (helo=center.shared) by smM.simplethings.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.50) id 1Ewzvs-0007s1-2X; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:43:52 +0100 Received: from [192.168.2.66] (helo=[192.168.2.66]) by center.shared with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ewzwj-0005z3-1B; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:44:45 +0100 Message-ID: <43C6331C.7060901@ccgis.de> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:44:44 +0100 From: Benjamin Thelen User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: de-DE, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/) Cc: Subject: doxygen 1.4.1 --> 1.4.6 error (solved) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:44:02 -0000 Hi all, I stumbled on this error while portupgrading doxygen 1.3.6 to 1.4.1 one year ago and here is an old friend again ;-): Transcript written on doxygen_manual.log. cp ../doc/doxygen_logo.eps . cp ../doc/doxygen_logo.gif . Running latex again to get a .dvi file... latex doxygen_manual.tex This is pdfeTeX, Version 3.141592-1.21a-2.2 (Web2C 7.5.4) ---! /root/.texmf-var/web2c/latex.fmt was written by tex (Fatal format file error; I'm stymied) gmake[1]: *** [doxygen_manual.dvi] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/data/ports/devel/doxygen/work/doxygen-1.4.6/latex' gmake: *** [pdf] Error 2 *** Error code 2 Stop in /data/ports/devel/doxygen. Just in case someone stumbles on it, too remove ~/.texmf-var (see /usr/ports/UPDATING, 20050213 for more information). Ben From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 11:57:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CAA916A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:57:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E2DB43D49 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:57:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0CBvaBg035366; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:57:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k0CBvanx035363; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:57:36 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:57:36 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: Chuck Swiger In-Reply-To: <43C517B7.704@mac.com> Message-ID: <20060112125658.W35216@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <20060111112654.O11627@chylonia.3miasto.net> <43C517B7.704@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: limiting Buf memory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:57:54 -0000 >> Mem: 529M Active, 209M Inact, 149M Wired, 38M Cache, 109M Buf, 1772K Free >> >> while "Cache" is dynamic, Buf is not and never goes down. >> >> how can i get it down to somehow like 40MB? > > I think "Buf" corresponds to what NetBSD's top calls "File", it's the amount > of memory that is bufferring raw blocks from the disk. Your traditional VM > disk cache is the "Cache" entry. > possibly you don't understand my question which is - how to set limits to "Buf" because it's now always 110MB. i From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 12:32:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C55BA16A420 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:32:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberto.nunnari@supsi.ch) Received: from mail.dti.supsi.ch (mail.dti.supsi.ch [193.5.153.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2188443D46 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:32:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberto.nunnari@supsi.ch) Received: from [193.5.152.27] (pcm2027.dti.supsi.ch [193.5.152.27]) by mail.dti.supsi.ch (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k0CCWLbc018726 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:32:21 +0100 Message-ID: <43C64C52.9020209@supsi.ch> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:32:18 +0100 From: Roberto Nunnari User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: patches and uname -a X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:32:24 -0000 Hello. Please also answer to my mailbox as I'm not on the list. After upgrading by sources and build world, uname correctly reports the current version of the system Today for the first time I applied all the relevant patches instead and all went well. The box was 5.3-RELEASE-p23. The applied patches should correspond to 5.3-RELEASE-p24, but: # uname -r 5.3-RELEASE-p23 and: # sysctl kern.version kern.version: FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p23 #0: Tue Jan 3 15:40:08 CET 2006 ... I'd like to be able to see the correct version using 'uname -r'.. Does anybody know how can you make uname report the real version? What if you recompile the kernel after patching the system? Would that do the trick? Thank you and best regards. -- Robi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 12:59:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF24B16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:59:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jaapb@kerguelen.org) Received: from courbet.kerguelen.org (courbet.kerguelen.org [82.226.7.107]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C45043D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:59:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jaapb@kerguelen.org) Received: from courbet.kerguelen.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by courbet.kerguelen.org (8.13.3/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k0CCx03u026751; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:59:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (jaapb@localhost) by courbet.kerguelen.org (8.13.3/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k0CCx099008755; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:59:00 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:58:59 +0100 (CET) From: Jaap Boender To: Roberto Nunnari In-Reply-To: <43C64C52.9020209@supsi.ch> Message-ID: References: <43C64C52.9020209@supsi.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: patches and uname -a X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:59:09 -0000 On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, Roberto Nunnari wrote: > Does anybody know how can you make uname report the > real version? What if you recompile the kernel after > patching the system? Would that do the trick? As far as I know, uname gets the version information from the kernel. So yes, if you recompile the kernel, you should be able to get the right version displayed. Yours, Jaap Boender From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 13:03:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59B0716A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:03:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from rosebud.otenet.gr (rosebud.otenet.gr [195.170.0.94]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B254E43D49 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:03:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) by rosebud.otenet.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-8) with SMTP id k0CD3SYH017177; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:03:28 +0200 Received: by flame.pc (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1BA6311755; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:01:57 +0200 (EET) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:01:57 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Kristian Vaaf , lars@gmx.at Message-ID: <20060112130157.GB1167@flame.pc> References: <43C56D47.1040809@gmx.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43C56D47.1040809@gmx.at> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: My script to replace strings in ASCII files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:03:33 -0000 On 2006-01-11 21:40, lars wrote: >Kristian Vaaf wrote: >> Just curious, what do I need to do to be able to execute this >> script like: >> >> $ text-replace old_string new_string >> >> I find it a bit inconvenient having to edit the script for >> every thing I need to replace. It is. You should start using $1, $2, ... for options. >> #!/usr/local/bin/bash >> # >> # Replace old with new inside all text files. >> # $URBAN: text-replace.sh,v 1.0 2005/10/24 15:09:05 vaaf Exp $ >> # >> >> for file in `find . -type f ! -name ".*"`; do >> >> if [ "`file -b "$file" | grep text`" != "" ]; then >> >> sed -i '' "s/old/new/g" "$file" >> >> echo "$file: Done" >> >> fi >> >> done > > Why not open the file with vim and then > :.,$s/old/new/ Heh, that's nice, and it may even work with multiple files using vim's -c option in a way similar to sed(1): vim -c ':%s/old/new/' file > Of course that's not scriptable... Using the -c option shown above, it may be scriptable too :) > Maybe you should interpolate the first and the second argument > into your regexes in the substitution with sed, > so you get "s/argument1/argument2/" > > Perl might help though. This opens a whole can of worms though. What if the user defined command-line parameters contain special characters (i.e. single quote, double quotes, etc.)? Instead of having to go through all the hoops of parsing quotes and other special characters in a shell script, and then invoking sed on each file, passing one file at a time, I prefer using "in place editing": $ grep emacs .bashrc export EDITOR='nemacs' alias emacs='nemacs' $ perl -pi -e "s/'nemacs'/'emacs'/g" .bashrc $ grep emacs .bashrc export EDITOR='emacs' alias emacs='emacs' $ perl -pi -e "s/'emacs'/'nemacs'/g" .bashrc $ grep emacs .bashrc export EDITOR='nemacs' alias emacs='nemacs' $ The number of files passed as 'extra' arguments to perl in this case is only limited by the amount of text that can fit in a single command-line, and if that's not enough you can use xargs(1) to work around the limit: find . -type f -name \*foo\* | xargs perl -pi -e "s/old/new/g" So, there's no need to write special shell scripts to do this :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 13:14:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 400AB16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:14:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from litgle@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF4ED43D48 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:14:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from litgle@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id z3so385917nzf for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 05:14:52 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=QSLZY/rjjpU25BGUGLJOx/fcl7A8iKZCCoPGfaMOWv6d+h5UWr7x0MVlpalpXljYozV0ojGvrDkX/Om+4lGMkASfrJjibDMIgrWtEkqqkwhgSWkz5D5bPFeUq2Oj0fnKb2S6AH0lK0trOwxNea47vqDWaE/Xe9uIXHb2ByMBiqA= Received: by 10.36.178.3 with SMTP id a3mr1907692nzf; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 05:14:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.80? ( [219.136.5.115]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 34sm1726310nza.2006.01.12.05.14.49; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 05:14:50 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <43C65642.6080106@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:14:42 +0800 From: litgle User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:14:53 -0000 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 13:17:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42E1516A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:17:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.3]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD02B43D46 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:17:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 324 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2006 13:17:00 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail1.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 12 Jan 2006 13:17:00 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 84EBC28423; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 08:16:59 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: Wojciech Puchar References: <20060111112654.O11627@chylonia.3miasto.net> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 12 Jan 2006 08:16:59 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20060111112654.O11627@chylonia.3miasto.net> Message-ID: <44irsptwl0.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 17 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: limiting Buf memory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:17:02 -0000 Wojciech Puchar writes: > on my 1GB machine: > > Mem: 529M Active, 209M Inact, 149M Wired, 38M Cache, 109M Buf, 1772K Free > > while "Cache" is dynamic, Buf is not and never goes down. > > how can i get it down to somehow like 40MB? I can't think of a way to do that. On the other hand, I can't think of a reason you would want to, either. You have plenty of memory available, so I can't imagine why you'd want to take the performance hit of reducing the buffer space. And: buffer use *is* dynamic, it just tends to be more stable than cache. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 13:39:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9756B16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:39:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dave@raven.za.net) Received: from elektra.opteqint.net (elektra.opteqint.net [209.25.178.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C2743D48 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:39:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dave@raven.za.net) Received: from [165.165.105.147] (helo=LUCY) by elektra.opteqint.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.52 (FreeBSD)) id 1Ex2kr-0000uV-NG; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 05:44:46 -0800 From: "Dave Raven" To: "'Peter Wood'" Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:40:39 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 Thread-Index: AcYW3aWwTqJgaszpSw2lIDxkg32gKgAn3dPQ In-Reply-To: <43C54E5D.8060608@alastria.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 X-Spam-Score: -101.4 (---------------------------------------------------) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "elektra.opteqint.net", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: Hi Peter and list, I am unfortunately using 4.x - but it should work fine as far as my understanding is. I'm not sure why it isn't working, but if I bridge em0 and em1 (my two interfaces) the cisco switches can ping each other. The problem is that anything inside the vlan being trunked doesn't go through [...] Content analysis details: (-101.4 points, 4.5 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -100 USER_IN_WHITELIST From: address is in the user's white-list -1.4 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 0.1 TW_FX BODY: Odd Letter Triples with FX Message-Id: <20060112133915.22C2743D48@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Bridging a Cisco Trunk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:39:16 -0000 Hi Peter and list, I am unfortunately using 4.x - but it should work fine as far as my understanding is. I'm not sure why it isn't working, but if I bridge em0 and em1 (my two interfaces) the cisco switches can ping each other. The problem is that anything inside the vlan being trunked doesn't go through Now I have tried your setup below and created the vlans and bridged them, which didn't work, but I don't understand the need for the vlans to be created anyway. Surely I should be able to just transparently bridge any traffic that comes from the one side through to the other, and it should work fine? I don't need to communicate on the vlan, just bridge anything that comes through... If I do have to add vlan0,vlan1 to a bridge that's also fine - but at the moment its not working. Thanks for the help Dave -----Original Message----- From: Peter Wood [mailto:peter@alastria.net] Sent: 11 January 2006 08:29 PM To: Dave Raven Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bridging a Cisco Trunk Dave, > I have two cisco switches, configured to put ports 2-6 on each of > them into vlan 100. Then I have port 1 on both set to trunk between the two > switches. If I have a device on port 2 on switch1 it can ping a device on > port 2 on switch2. I do this quite often, and it works very well on 6.0 for me. You haven't mentioned what version your using, but I will assume you have if_bridge. If you don't and you're gonna use this machine alot for bridging, I'd recommend moving to 6.0. So presumably, you have two interfaces, plugged into the trunk port on each cisco. For arguements sake, we'll say you have an fxp0 and fxp1. So first step is you need to make sure these two interfaces are "up", very important, if they arn't, then it wont work. It's easy to forget if you arn't assigning IP's to them. Remove "polling" if you don't have it compiled into the kernel, but again if you're gonna be bridging packets alot, get it compiled in. It helps.... alot. ifconfig_fxp0="up polling" ifconfig_fxp1="up polling" Now create the vlans (and the bridge for later on). cloned_interfaces="vlan0 vlan1 bridge0" ifconfig_vlan0="vlan 100 vlandev fxp0 up" ifconfig_vlan1="vlan 100 vlandev fxp1 up" In the above please note the "up"s, if they arn't up then it wont bridge. Now setup the bridge, again noticing the "up". ifconfig_bridge0="addm vlan0 addm vlan1 up" It should now be working, watch the kernel console and the cisco's logs to see if there are any mismatches or bridging loops. It also seems that you have to put the "up" at the end of these commands, it took an hour of debugging last night after I had put the up at the start of the ifconfig_vlan lines. Give it a go, send a reply to both me and the list if you are still stuck, Pete. -- Peter Wood :: From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 9 21:25:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90B4216A41F for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 21:25:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from geoaru@telus.net) Received: from priv-edmwes26.telusplanet.net (defout.telus.net [204.209.205.55]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C862843D46 for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 21:25:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from geoaru@telus.net) Received: from trex ([137.186.212.137]) by priv-edmwes26.telusplanet.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.04 201-2131-123-105-20051025) with SMTP id <20060109212519.BXIS7062.priv-edmwes26.telusplanet.net@trex> for ; Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:25:19 -0700 Message-ID: <000801c61564$12bb1040$89d4ba89@ab.hsia.telus.net> From: "Art" To: Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:31:37 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:40:52 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: What Are The Best Servers To Run Your OPS On ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 21:25:20 -0000 Dear sirs, Could you tell me what are the best multi-processor servers to run = your 6.0 OPS on ? Thanks Art. geoaru@telus.net =20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 13:43:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3555616A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:43:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Received: from ns2.alphaque.com (ns2.alphaque.com [202.75.47.153]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2527143D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:43:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Received: (qmail 78669 invoked by uid 0); 12 Jan 2006 13:43:15 -0000 Received: from lucifer.net-gw.com (HELO prophet.alphaque.com) (202.75.47.153) by lucifer.net-gw.com with SMTP; 12 Jan 2006 13:43:15 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prophet.alphaque.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0CDg8hq029398; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:42:08 +0800 (MYT) (envelope-from dinesh@alphaque.com) Message-ID: <43C65CAF.4070201@alphaque.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:42:07 +0800 From: Dinesh Nair User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.8b) Gecko/20051026 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gandalf References: <43C3D84D.3050907@messias.qhigh.com> In-Reply-To: <43C3D84D.3050907@messias.qhigh.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Xorg - how to disable some video modes? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:43:21 -0000 On 01/10/06 23:52 gandalf said the following: > Thanks for trying. It does not work for me. I found that xfce4's control > panel is able to switch between 1024x768, 800x600 and 640x480. (Xfce > also resizes the virtual size.) I don't know how it can do it because > theoretically the only valid modes are 1024x768 and 1280x1024. gah, xfce4's control panel doesnt do that for me, though it used to on another older notebook i was using. for the life of me i cant remember what i did to make this happen then and not not. my xorg.conf is minimal. using xvidtune or ctrl-atl-numpad+ does switch video modes, but the virtual screen remains at the larger 1400x1050 size, thus giving that pan effect. would anyone hit me with a cluebat[1] on how to fix this ? [1] i never had this problem before, so i've obviously goofed up somewhere in porting over xorg.org. -- Regards, /\_/\ "All dogs go to heaven." dinesh@alphaque.com (0 0) http://www.alphaque.com/ +==========================----oOO--(_)--OOo----==========================+ | for a in past present future; do | | for b in clients employers associates relatives neighbours pets; do | | echo "The opinions here in no way reflect the opinions of my $a $b." | | done; done | +=========================================================================+ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 14:53:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2185616A41F for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:53:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from listsub@401.cx) Received: from rambo.401.cx (rambo.401.cx [80.65.205.166]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC14D43D62 for ; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:53:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from listsub@401.cx) Received: from [10.3.101.21] (132.dairy.twenty4help.se [80.65.195.132]) by rambo.401.cx (8.13.3/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k0AErEdh089773; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:53:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from listsub@401.cx) Message-ID: <43C3C9E8.6000801@401.cx> Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:51:20 +0100 From: "Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Miguel Saturnino References: <20051224153412.26322.qmail@web33314.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <1135441634.787.10.camel@localhost> In-Reply-To: <1135441634.787.10.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:44:38 +0000 Cc: "Daniel A." , danial_thom@yahoo.com, "Michael C. Shultz" , Andy Sjostrom , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BSD Question's. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:53:19 -0000 Miguel Saturnino wrote: > On Sat, 2005-12-24 at 07:34 -0800, Danial Thom wrote: > Well, that's your opinion. For me, FreeBSD is a much better desktop than > Windows -- it runs solid and fast and enables me to be more productive > in my work. Of course, what is good for me might not be so good for > someone else, I guess it depends on your needs. > > Some Linux distros are much easier to setup than FreeBSD, so they might > be a more recommendable desktop for someone with less technical > knowledge. Ever tried DesktopBSD (www.desktopbsd.org) or PcBSD (www.pcbsd.org)? Unless the Linux-distros provides you with a geek that does the installation for you, I can possible see how they could be easier to setup. Yes, you talk about FreeBSD, but after all both DesktopBSD and PcBSD are basically just preconfigured and pre-packaged versions of FreeBSD. For anyone looking for a BSD-based desktop OS, I highly recommend the two mentioned above. I was surprised to see how extremely userfriendly they were despite being relatively new projects. -- R From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 13:54:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6ED3616A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:54:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from hermes2.cf.ac.uk (hermes2.cf.ac.uk [131.251.0.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ECAB43D6B for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:54:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrir.insrv.cf.ac.uk ([131.251.50.213]) by hermes2.cf.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Ex2uK-0003rL-15; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:54:28 +0000 In-Reply-To: <43C64C52.9020209@supsi.ch> References: <43C64C52.9020209@supsi.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-11--146920764" Message-Id: <8E000CF1-7D7E-4E63-8EE5-BB87BF9C44E8@submonkey.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ceri Davies Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:54:28 +0000 To: Roberto Nunnari X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.1 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: Cardiff University Sophos AV Cc: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: patches and uname -a X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:54:35 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-11--146920764 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On 12 Jan 2006, at 12:32, Roberto Nunnari wrote: > Hello. > > Please also answer to my mailbox as I'm not on the list. > > After upgrading by sources and build world, uname correctly > reports the current version of the system > > Today for the first time I applied all the relevant patches > instead and all went well. The box was 5.3-RELEASE-p23. > > The applied patches should correspond to 5.3-RELEASE-p24, but: > > # uname -r > 5.3-RELEASE-p23 > > and: > > # sysctl kern.version > kern.version: FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p23 #0: Tue Jan 3 15:40:08 CET 2006 > ... > > I'd like to be able to see the correct version using > 'uname -r'.. > > Does anybody know how can you make uname report the > real version? What if you recompile the kernel after > patching the system? Would that do the trick? Recompiling the kernel is the correct way to change the output of uname(1), but before you do so, you should be aware that that patch number is taken from the BRANCH variable in src/sys/conf/newvers.sh. Check that it says "5.3-RELEASE-p24" before you waste time recompiling the kernel. Ceri --Apple-Mail-11--146920764 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDxl+Zme8yCsQvJJ0RAlJDAJ9ahcH4yopyMsK4NhBpgMg4AF4/MACcCJFh nnTwUraEPcXwpDe+kHpdaoE= =0yJY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-11--146920764-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 14:11:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D0416A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:11:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33315.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33315.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 3CF1443D75 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:11:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 59985 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Jan 2006 14:11:28 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ikl7gfyVhNinSmbXCoPE+Um3y9fwj/9Nimw2NCBnDL+AWFc1D4V2bppAeCbOhxM9jn3iXTLeW0G1BR2O/Y8e48v07L2QTyB5NndDqdQEKxNv5v5yYYPZ5CrE9mQVJLa9s7CY5HcckF3r+3ygBX6qFRNbKjqsQtWaNncFL0qaPmE= ; Message-ID: <20060112141128.59983.qmail@web33315.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33315.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 06:11:28 PST Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 06:11:28 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: Ted Mittelstaedt , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: RE: Sparc vs i386 architecture X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:11:31 -0000 >The ability of a car to handle perfectly at >100Mph is more than just a minor improvement, >unless you just use a car to take you to the >train station or to the market. > Ted wrote: "Actually, it's a pure waste of money, at least in the US, since no public roads have 100Mph speed limits and chances of driving that fast with any regularity are about nil. (unless you live out in the boondocks, in which case your joy toy is gonna get it's undercarriage torn off by the dirt road you have to go on.)" Yeah, Ted. Good cars are a waste of money. You're really starting to sound like a poor guy now! So goes it for good food. Good wine? Well you can get drunk on cheap wine too, so who cares. lol DT __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 14:20:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D641E16A420 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:20:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33307.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33307.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B514443D66 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:19:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 91322 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Jan 2006 14:19:25 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=v4RoyU0Z9OhyFb1GUyJ+2toSJRr9atvshKY4jJU7El5LetU63ylxWrjV8Qno0mms5lZZAZ3J+p03GPlO3IZaIgJ8pbOsn8vBv6yUjGuvHk8/aG4NeTU6+FbHdsq1I8y85cZ3Heo46kIby15FpgDlNDeNA2MIK/DpDwR4SX8UPWA= ; Message-ID: <20060112141925.91320.qmail@web33307.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33307.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 06:19:25 PST Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 06:19:25 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: Martin Cracauer , "Marc G. Fournier" In-Reply-To: <20060111191224.A93090@cons.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dual Core vs HyperThreading vs Dual CPU X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:20:34 -0000 --- Martin Cracauer wrote: > Marc G. Fournier wrote on Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at > 12:52:24PM -0400: > > > > I'm going to assume that Dual Core is better > (can't believe that they took > > a step back) ... but, is how does it rate? I > know that HyperThreading is > > definitely != Dual CPU ... but how close does > Dual Core get? > > It is the real thing, at least when it comes to > AMD64 and > Netburst-based Intel dual-cores. Every core > has a full set of own > caches just like dual CPU. Yonah (dual-core > Pentium-M) has a shared > L2 cache. > > I have benchmarks comparing dual-core 939 > socket systems against dual > 940 socket systems here: > http://cracauer-forum.cons.org/forum/crabench.html Just a question about your benches, any reason you just don't ship files to /dev/null? That was always the standard in unix to get the disk out of it. DT __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 14:26:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 188CE16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:26:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: from web33305.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33305.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EA69343D7B for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:26:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from danial_thom@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 10908 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Jan 2006 14:26:01 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=CSWW3EVicHFmxMuqcmMrG2IYY28peDAn1tF4PDT6PThJW40TlYQAiKiMe98w5IX/9iAoiyprqOKyo1jGPr8D+4Nj/fM3L2AJGhxm6B46rT0DAIdrM/x0tBm3TkJepqEo8m/S9RofT/IjrjMztTmOz8yRumcz8G9+OU7N2sJvF+U= ; Message-ID: <20060112142601.10906.qmail@web33305.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [24.46.186.215] by web33305.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 06:26:01 PST Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 06:26:01 -0800 (PST) From: Danial Thom To: Garrett Cooper , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <00B61835-9B73-4058-ABDF-888B522B1A97@u.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: Re: Dual Core vs HyperThreading vs Dual CPU X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: danial_thom@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:26:11 -0000 --- Garrett Cooper wrote: > On Jan 11, 2006, at 12:36 PM, Danial Thom > wrote: > > > Wait, I can "download music, run a virus > scanner > > and play games" all at the same time? wow. > Wait, > > I can do that anyway. Does each core have its > own > > hard drive too? > > > > I wonder how many meetings they had before > they > > came up with that "description" of the > benefits > > of dual core technology. People are so easily > > bamboozled. > > > > DT > > No kidding. But I doubt the competence of > people that buy computers > from big name manufacturers, unless they bought > it maybe for server > applications, large scale deployment of > machines, etc. Gotta love > their little Flash graphics with the "balls" > representing "bits", > just hopping along the CPU/cores... lol. > -Garrett Interesting view. Perhaps the ability to get the "same thing" has value to "some people"? If you factor in the costs of labor and acquisition costs Dell is a pretty good deal. They use solid supermicro MBs AFAIK, so there is no technological downside. Frankly I don't use them, but if I were buying many system for a large company its a good way to go. Frankly, I question the competence of scores of people who "upgrade" their open-source OS servers witout testing it first. The assumption that because something is newer that its better is just as incompetent as the assumption that big companies sell better products. Relying on useless benchmarks and highly questionable testing techniques is exactly the same as buying into marketing hype. DT __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 14:26:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9072C16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:26:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberto.nunnari@supsi.ch) Received: from mail3.ticino.com (mail3.ticino.com [195.190.166.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F72543D55 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:26:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberto.nunnari@supsi.ch) X-Spam-Score: 1 Received: from [192.168.1.6] (unverified [62.48.103.172]) by mail3.ticino.com (Rockliffe SMTPRA 6.1.22) with ESMTP id ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:26:19 +0100 Message-ID: <43C6670E.5000500@supsi.ch> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:26:22 +0100 From: Roberto Nunnari User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 X-Accept-Language: it-ch, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ceri Davies References: <43C64C52.9020209@supsi.ch> <8E000CF1-7D7E-4E63-8EE5-BB87BF9C44E8@submonkey.net> In-Reply-To: <8E000CF1-7D7E-4E63-8EE5-BB87BF9C44E8@submonkey.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: patches and uname -a X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:26:22 -0000 Thank you Ceri and Jaap for your time. Ceri, edit src/sys/conf/newvers.sh and replace BRANCH="RELEASE-p23" with BRANCH="RELEASE-p24" would be enough?? Best regards. Ceri Davies wrote: > > On 12 Jan 2006, at 12:32, Roberto Nunnari wrote: > >> Hello. >> >> Please also answer to my mailbox as I'm not on the list. >> >> After upgrading by sources and build world, uname correctly >> reports the current version of the system >> >> Today for the first time I applied all the relevant patches >> instead and all went well. The box was 5.3-RELEASE-p23. >> >> The applied patches should correspond to 5.3-RELEASE-p24, but: >> >> # uname -r >> 5.3-RELEASE-p23 >> >> and: >> >> # sysctl kern.version >> kern.version: FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p23 #0: Tue Jan 3 15:40:08 CET 2006 >> ... >> >> I'd like to be able to see the correct version using >> 'uname -r'.. >> >> Does anybody know how can you make uname report the >> real version? What if you recompile the kernel after >> patching the system? Would that do the trick? > > > Recompiling the kernel is the correct way to change the output of > uname(1), but before you do so, you should be aware that that patch > number is taken from the BRANCH variable in src/sys/conf/newvers.sh. > Check that it says "5.3-RELEASE-p24" before you waste time recompiling > the kernel. > > Ceri From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 14:37:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F41ED16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:37:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-3-1-cust208.cdif.cable.ntl.com [82.31.78.208]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5459643D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:37:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from ceri by shrike.submonkey.net with local (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Ex3Zy-000MMb-7B; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:37:30 +0000 Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:37:30 +0000 From: Ceri Davies To: Roberto Nunnari Message-ID: <20060112143730.GJ28781@submonkey.net> Mail-Followup-To: Ceri Davies , Roberto Nunnari , "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" References: <43C64C52.9020209@supsi.ch> <8E000CF1-7D7E-4E63-8EE5-BB87BF9C44E8@submonkey.net> <43C6670E.5000500@supsi.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EVh9lyqKgK19OcEf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43C6670E.5000500@supsi.ch> X-PGP: finger ceri@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: Ceri Davies Cc: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: patches and uname -a X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:37:32 -0000 --EVh9lyqKgK19OcEf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 03:26:22PM +0100, Roberto Nunnari wrote: >=20 > Ceri Davies wrote: > > > >On 12 Jan 2006, at 12:32, Roberto Nunnari wrote: > > > >>Hello. > >> > >>Please also answer to my mailbox as I'm not on the list. > >> > >>After upgrading by sources and build world, uname correctly > >>reports the current version of the system > >> > >>Today for the first time I applied all the relevant patches > >>instead and all went well. The box was 5.3-RELEASE-p23. > >> > >>The applied patches should correspond to 5.3-RELEASE-p24, but: > >> > >># uname -r > >>5.3-RELEASE-p23 > >> > >>and: > >> > >># sysctl kern.version > >>kern.version: FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p23 #0: Tue Jan 3 15:40:08 CET 2006 > >>... > >> > >>I'd like to be able to see the correct version using > >>'uname -r'.. > >> > >>Does anybody know how can you make uname report the > >>real version? What if you recompile the kernel after > >>patching the system? Would that do the trick? > > > > > >Recompiling the kernel is the correct way to change the output of =20 > >uname(1), but before you do so, you should be aware that that patch =20 > >number is taken from the BRANCH variable in src/sys/conf/newvers.sh. = =20 > >Check that it says "5.3-RELEASE-p24" before you waste time recompiling= =20 > >the kernel. > > > >Ceri > > Thank you Ceri and Jaap for your time. >=20 > Ceri, edit src/sys/conf/newvers.sh and replace >=20 > BRANCH=3D"RELEASE-p23" > with > BRANCH=3D"RELEASE-p24" >=20 > would be enough?? That would work, but if you don't already have that string then there is a possibility that you don't have all the patches, so please only change it if you are %100 sure that you have. I cannot stress that enough. Ceri --=20 Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. -- Einstein (attrib.) --EVh9lyqKgK19OcEf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDxmmqocfcwTS3JF8RAiC8AJ9WdpL+XN0zWWL604LlyA+v5HwJ5ACgxIMy x2vdJbUQlnwGKRk6zOLSFBM= =L92b -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EVh9lyqKgK19OcEf-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 14:57:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5621D16A423 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:57:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cgross@2blc.Com) Received: from bruce.cnv.fr (bruce.cnv.fr [84.96.23.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C7743D48 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:57:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cgross@2blc.Com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bruce.cnv.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 809616F19C for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:57:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from bruce.cnv.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bruce.cnv.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 13435-04-3 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:57:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from PRTCEDRICXP (prt-cedricxp.cnv.local [10.0.0.31]) by bruce.cnv.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A8D6D667 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:57:07 +0100 (CET) From: "cedric Gross" To: Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:58:06 +0100 Organization: 2BLC MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 thread-index: AcYXiJWENUhaas1+SLGZ4Yr0hQlJew== Message-Id: <20060112145707.76A8D6D667@bruce.cnv.fr> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cnv.fr Subject: IpNat and 3 NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:57:16 -0000 Hello, I have my FreeBSD 5.4 box with 3 NIC : Xl0 LAN with network 10.0.0.0/8 and 192.168.0.0/30 VR0 Wan 84.96.23.106/32 VR1 LAN with network 192.168.0.32/27 and 192.168.0.96/27 I use IPNAT and Ip filter. I'm doing NAT from Xl0 to Vr0, it's working fine I'm trying to do the same thing with vr1 to Vr0 but it's seems that traffic coming from vr1 are not translated. Is there a interface limitation with IPNAT ? Is there a way to do translation from both NIC ? Here is my ipnat.conf : map vr0 10.0.0.0/8 -> 84.96.23.106/32 proxy port ftp ftp/tcp map vr0 10.0.0.0/8 -> 84.96.23.106/32 portmap tcp/udp 20000:60000 map vr0 10.0.0.0/8 -> 84.96.23.106/32 map vr0 192.168.0.0/30 -> 84.96.23.106/32 portmap tcp/udp auto map vr1 192.168.0.32/27 -> 84.96.23.106/32 portmap tcp/udp auto map vr1 192.168.0.32/27 -> 84.96.23.106/32 map vr1 192.168.0.96/27 -> 84.96.23.106/32 portmap tcp/udp auto map vr1 192.168.0.96/27 -> 84.96.23.106/32 rdr xl0 0.0.0.0/0 port 80 -> 10.0.0.254 port 3128 tcp rdr vr1 192.168.0.32/27 port 80 -> 10.0.0.254 port 3128 tcp rdr vr1 192.168.0.96/27 port 80 -> 10.0.0.254 port 3128 tcp Thanks for help. Cedric From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 15:20:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B83816A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:20:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsdlists@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B06443D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:20:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsdlists@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 71so436349wri for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 07:20:18 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=CDb6P8qLbYaqDcEhhrEAbnkHrLLm2dfqoNvmHa96PekGTJMKdl+8x3Wtw4KkUJ0Kl2eOxHKDO7bs1PqaDvo1qccic5QkfEekNWl3c/ISOnObmlazts0cBiZypjMbm3B7HDc6TK/1ZVlGST7d8MDTYlYS/9YwDtRI2L4PTnBcxSc= Received: by 10.65.183.7 with SMTP id k7mr772659qbp; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 07:20:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.188.5 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 07:20:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <54db43990601120720l34d26c5s7d66ee00fb111938@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:20:18 -0500 From: Bob Johnson To: danial_thom@yahoo.com In-Reply-To: <20051224153412.26322.qmail@web33314.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200512240719.51264.ringworm01@gmail.com> <20051224153412.26322.qmail@web33314.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Cc: bobo1001@mailtest2.eng.ufl.edu, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Andy Sjostrom Subject: Re: BSD Question's. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:20:20 -0000 On 12/24/05, Danial Thom wrote: > > Why not just tell the truth, which is that > Windows XP is the best that you can do for the > desktop, and that there is no perfect solution > that works perfectly in every scenario? FreeBSD > and Linux *should* focus on server functions, > because that is where MS is weak and that is > where its needed. There will likely never be a > solid reason to use BSD or linux as a desktop > other than religion; while there are many > compelling reasons to use BSD and/or linux > servers. > I've been using FreeBSD on my desktop since 1997 because I found it to be superior to either Windows or Linux. In 1997 it was easier to install than either (well, configuring X was still a trick back then, but the basic OS install was easier). Now they are all pretty much the same, any of them can give you problems on a specific system. =20 The important thing for a desktop system is the user interface (the GUI), and in FreeBSD (and many versions of Linux), you have many choices in that regard. I use KDE, in part because it is easy to use if you are used to Windows. Others prefer Gnome, apparently because it is as much unlike Windows as its designers can manage. And there are literally dozens of others, but most of them are probably not good choices for beginners (because they often require a lot of customization to take advantage of their individual features). At the present time I cringe every time I have to use Windows. My wife has an XP system at home that she uses for her job, so we are sort if stuck with it. All users must share the same default email program, so I'm stuck with Outlook. All users must share the same screen resolution, so I'm stuck with the low resolution that my wife prefers. The video drivers (I've tried both ATI and nVidia cards) are constantly locking up the system -- anyone who tries to tell me Windows XP is "stable" gets a big laugh from me. In dozens of little ways, the Windows user interface is junk. Yes, by sheer brute force they manage to keep it usable for most people, but when you've used alternatives, it's flaws are far more visible. KDE running on FreeBSD, on the other hand, lets each user pick their own preferences for basically everything. Certainly it has its own flaws, and yes, you could run KDE on Linux instead of FreeBSD and avoid a few quirks the combination exhibits, and perhaps a non-computer type should do so, but every time I read local Linux support list I marvel at how much trouble the Linux people have doing things that seem easy in FreeBSD, so I'm happy where I am. And this list provides excellent support for those who need help. The big disadvantage of FreeBSD (and Linux)? Fewer hardware drivers.=20 For example, I have a film scanner that I haven't figured out how to use in FreeBSD, so to use it I have to use Windows (with the aforementioned low screen resolution!). If you have specific hardware you need to use, be sure it is supported by the operating system you choose. One caution: Linux isn't an operating system. It is a family of operating systems. Some of them are oriented toward professional users, others are oriented toward ease of use by computer beginners, etc. If you decide to go with Linux, selecting the right one will be important. > When you try to be everything to everyone and you > don't have the resources of a MS, then you end up > with mediocre results. Decide what you want to > be, and be the best at it. That should be the > mantra of any product development team, > regardless of the genre. And Microsoft has proven that even with their resources, you still get mediocre results. For the most part, a good server operating system is also a good desktop operating system if you add a good user interface, so you can add KDE (or any of several other choices) to FreeBSD and get a good desktop system. On the other hand, a system designed to be a desktop operating system is unlikely to perform well as a server, hence Microsoft's lack of impressiveness in that regard. - Bob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 15:21:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1936B16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:21:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kiffin.gish@planet.nl) Received: from post-22.mail.nl.demon.net (post-22.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94ADC43D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:21:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kiffin.gish@planet.nl) Received: from gish.demon.nl ([83.160.27.223]:15402 helo=[192.168.1.33]) by post-22.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1Ex4GM-0006fS-7Z for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:21:18 +0000 From: Kiffin Gish To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:21:18 +0100 Message-Id: <1137079278.821.5.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Making shared libraries findable ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:21:21 -0000 I have some shared libraries blah.so etc. that I want to be available to other programs. They are located in a separate directory from the default linux compat stuff. I guess I could create a link using ln -s, but every time blah.so is rebuilt the link will not longer be valid. What's the standard way of taking care of this? Thanks alot in advance. -- Kiffin Gish From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 15:21:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C5C416A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:21:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tofik@oxygen.az) Received: from mail.alkar.net (mail.alkar.net [195.248.191.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CB9B43D69 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:21:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tofik@oxygen.az) Received: from [213.227.193.75] (HELO [192.168.0.178]) by mail.alkar.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.9) with ESMTP id 424180596; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:21:44 +0200 Message-ID: <43C6904D.3060708@oxygen.az> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:22:21 +0000 From: Tofik Suleymanov User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050404) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Beastie References: <43C5CC81.6060104@mra.co.id> <20060112082101.GL45938@ns2.wananchi.com> <43C61BB5.3030003@mra.co.id> In-Reply-To: <43C61BB5.3030003@mra.co.id> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freeradius freebsd-6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:21:56 -0000 Beastie wrote: > Odhiambo Washington wrote: > >> * On 12/01/06 10:26 +0700, Beastie wrote: >> >> >>> Dear List. >>> >>> I try to running freeradius 1.0.5 on FreeBSD-6.0 Stable. >>> freeradius install from latest port, installation was successfull. >>> but i can't see the server is running and working. >>> ps ax | grep radius or netsat -ta | grep radius came with no >>> result, after starting service from rc startup file provided or via >>> command line tools radiusd. >>> >> >> >> Maybe the startup script wants you to add an entry in /etc/rc.conf if >> it relies on the rcNG. >> Read that script and see what is inside. >> >> >> http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html >> >> DISCLAIMER: See http://www.wananchi.com/bms/terms.php >> >> -- >> +======================================================================+ >> |\ _,,,---,,_ | Odhiambo Washington >> Zzz /,`.-'`' -. ;-;;,_ | Wananchi Online Ltd. www.wananchi.com >> |,4- ) )-,_. ,\ ( `'-'| Tel: +254 20 313985-9 +254 20 313922 >> '---''(_/--' `-'\_) | GSM: +254 722 743223 +254 733 744121 >> +======================================================================+ >> >> "His great aim was to escape from civilization, and, as soon as he had >> money, he went to Southern California." >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> > Thanks... > this my rc.conf > > beastie# cat /etc/rc.conf | grep radius > radiusd_enable="YES" > > but it still not running.. > > regards > reza > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" start radius with -X switch and paste the output here. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 15:23:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D9F016A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:23:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kaw@aegis.dynalias.net) Received: from vms040pub.verizon.net (vms040pub.verizon.net [206.46.252.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B168A43D66 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:23:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kaw@aegis.dynalias.net) Received: from aegis ([70.17.246.53]) by vms040.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.2-4.02 (built Sep 9 2005)) with ESMTPA id <0ISZ00GFIK3QYZG4@vms040.mailsrvcs.net> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:23:51 -0600 (CST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aegis (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6883D18295 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:23:50 -0500 (EST) Received: from aegis ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (aegis [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 21880-04 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:23:22 -0500 (EST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aegis (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC1D518294 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:23:21 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:23:13 -0500 From: "K. Workman" In-reply-to: <43C5CC81.6060104@mra.co.id> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <43C67461.4080900@aegis.dynalias.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at aegis.dynalias.net References: <43C5CC81.6060104@mra.co.id> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) Subject: Re: freeradius freebsd-6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:23:56 -0000 I just recently got this working on my system (5.4). Have you tried running it in the foreground (-fX) to see if it is reporting any additional errors? It wouldn't run on my system unless all the configuration files were present and correct. Beastie wrote: > Dear List. > > I try to running freeradius 1.0.5 on FreeBSD-6.0 Stable. > freeradius install from latest port, installation was successfull. > but i can't see the server is running and working. > ps ax | grep radius or netsat -ta | grep radius came with no result, > after starting service from rc startup file provided or via command > line tools radiusd. > > this is my radiusd -X > > beastie# radiusd -X > Starting - reading configuration files ... > reread_config: reading radiusd.conf > Config: including file: /usr/local/etc/raddb/proxy.conf > Config: including file: /usr/local/etc/raddb/clients.conf > Config: including file: /usr/local/etc/raddb/snmp.conf > Config: including file: /usr/local/etc/raddb/eap.conf > Config: including file: /usr/local/etc/raddb/sql.conf > main: prefix = "/usr/local" > main: localstatedir = "/var" > main: logdir = "/var/log" > main: libdir = "/usr/local/lib" > main: radacctdir = "/var/log/radacct" > main: hostname_lookups = no > main: max_request_time = 30 > main: cleanup_delay = 5 > main: max_requests = 1024 > main: delete_blocked_requests = 0 > main: port = 0 > main: allow_core_dumps = no > main: log_stripped_names = no > main: log_file = "/var/log/radius.log" > main: log_auth = no > main: log_auth_badpass = no > main: log_auth_goodpass = no > main: pidfile = "/var/run/radiusd/radiusd.pid" > main: user = "nobody" > main: group = "shadow" > main: usercollide = no > main: lower_user = "no" > main: lower_pass = "no" > main: nospace_user = "no" > main: nospace_pass = "no" > main: checkrad = "/usr/local/sbin/checkrad" > main: proxy_requests = yes > proxy: retry_delay = 5 > proxy: retry_count = 3 > proxy: synchronous = no > proxy: default_fallback = yes > proxy: dead_time = 120 > proxy: post_proxy_authorize = yes > proxy: wake_all_if_all_dead = no > security: max_attributes = 200 > security: reject_delay = 1 > security: status_server = no > main: debug_level = 0 > read_config_files: reading dictionary > read_config_files: reading naslist > Using deprecated naslist file. Support for this will go away soon. > read_config_files: reading clients > > Is there anyone can help me to fix this ? > > regards > reza > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 15:25:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F58016A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:25:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kiffin.gish@planet.nl) Received: from post-22.mail.nl.demon.net (post-22.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6AD043D5E for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:25:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kiffin.gish@planet.nl) Received: from gish.demon.nl ([83.160.27.223]:15467 helo=[192.168.1.33]) by post-22.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1Ex4Kg-0007GN-1f for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:25:46 +0000 From: Kiffin Gish To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <1137079278.821.5.camel@localhost> References: <1137079278.821.5.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:25:46 +0100 Message-Id: <1137079546.821.7.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Making shared libraries findable ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:25:51 -0000 On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 16:21 +0100, Kiffin Gish wrote: > I have some shared libraries blah.so etc. that I want to be available to > other programs. They are located in a separate directory from the > default linux compat stuff. > > I guess I could create a link using ln -s, but every time blah.so is > rebuilt the link will not longer be valid. > > What's the standard way of taking care of this? > > Thanks alot in advance. > Why don't you try ldconfig -m /path_to_blah ? -- Kiffin Gish From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 15:33:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DAF016A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:33:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gandalf@messias.qhigh.com) Received: from messias.qhigh.com (53d82f82.adsl.enternet.hu [83.216.47.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85A4543D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:33:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gandalf@messias.qhigh.com) Received: from [172.16.0.26] (earth.msnet [172.16.0.26]) by messias.qhigh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C87D5C1D; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:38:59 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43C0E3CF.1080005@messias.qhigh.com> Date: Sun, 08 Jan 2006 11:05:03 +0100 From: User Gandalf User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051228) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dinesh Nair , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <43C3D84D.3050907@messias.qhigh.com> <43C65CAF.4070201@alphaque.com> In-Reply-To: <43C65CAF.4070201@alphaque.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: Xorg - how to disable some video modes? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:33:04 -0000 > > gah, xfce4's control panel doesnt do that for me, though it used to on > another older notebook i was using. for the life of me i cant remember > what i did to make this happen then and not not. my xorg.conf is minimal. Which version are you using? I may be a new feature? 4.2.3.2 (Xfce 4.2) > > using xvidtune or ctrl-atl-numpad+ does switch video modes, but the > virtual screen remains at the larger 1400x1050 size, thus giving that > pan effect. would anyone hit me with a cluebat[1] on how to fix this ? I have an Intel i810 card, and xvidtune does not support it. :-( I cannot help you with this. Les From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 15:43:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89EE616A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:43:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta13.adelphia.net (mta13.mail.adelphia.net [68.168.78.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E034343D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:43:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.117]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060112154329.PXVR26442.mta13.adelphia.net@barbish>; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:43:29 -0500 From: "fbsd_user" To: "cedric Gross" , Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:43:21 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20060112145707.76A8D6D667@bruce.cnv.fr> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Cc: Subject: RE: IpNat and 3 NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:43:30 -0000 You have ipnat statements wrong. should be liked this map vr0 10.0.0.0/8 -> 0.32 proxy port ftp ftp/tcp map vr0 10.0.0.0/8 -> 0.32 portmap tcp/udp 20000:60000 map vr0 10.0.0.0/8 -> 0.32 map vr0 192.168.0.0/30 -> 0.32 portmap tcp/udp auto map vr0 192.168.0.32/27 -> 0.32 portmap tcp/udp auto map vr0 192.168.0.32/27 -> 0.32 map vr0 192.168.0.96/27 -> 0.32 portmap tcp/udp auto map vr0 192.168.0.96/27 -> 0.32 rdr xl0 0.0.0.0/0 port 80 -> 10.0.0.254 port 3128 tcp rdr vr1 192.168.0.32/27 port 80 -> 10.0.0.254 port 3128 tcp rdr vr1 192.168.0.96/27 port 80 -> 10.0.0.254 port 3128 tcp Note map vr1 has been changed to vr0 If your public IP 84.96.23.106 is not dedicated to you by your ISP, then you should not be hard coding it in your IPnat rules. Read the Freebsd ipfilter documentation in the handbook for details. 0.32 = The IP address/netmask assigned by your ISP. The special keyword 0.32 tells ipnat to get the current public IP address of the interface specified on this statement and substitute it for the 0.32 keyword. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of cedric Gross Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 9:58 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: IpNat and 3 NIC Hello, I have my FreeBSD 5.4 box with 3 NIC : Xl0 LAN with network 10.0.0.0/8 and 192.168.0.0/30 VR0 Wan 84.96.23.106/32 VR1 LAN with network 192.168.0.32/27 and 192.168.0.96/27 I use IPNAT and Ip filter. I'm doing NAT from Xl0 to Vr0, it's working fine I'm trying to do the same thing with vr1 to Vr0 but it's seems that traffic coming from vr1 are not translated. Is there a interface limitation with IPNAT ? Is there a way to do translation from both NIC ? Here is my ipnat.conf : map vr0 10.0.0.0/8 -> 84.96.23.106/32 proxy port ftp ftp/tcp map vr0 10.0.0.0/8 -> 84.96.23.106/32 portmap tcp/udp 20000:60000 map vr0 10.0.0.0/8 -> 84.96.23.106/32 map vr0 192.168.0.0/30 -> 84.96.23.106/32 portmap tcp/udp auto map vr1 192.168.0.32/27 -> 84.96.23.106/32 portmap tcp/udp auto map vr1 192.168.0.32/27 -> 84.96.23.106/32 map vr1 192.168.0.96/27 -> 84.96.23.106/32 portmap tcp/udp auto map vr1 192.168.0.96/27 -> 84.96.23.106/32 rdr xl0 0.0.0.0/0 port 80 -> 10.0.0.254 port 3128 tcp rdr vr1 192.168.0.32/27 port 80 -> 10.0.0.254 port 3128 tcp rdr vr1 192.168.0.96/27 port 80 -> 10.0.0.254 port 3128 tcp Thanks for help. Cedric _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 15:52:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9660616A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:52:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tfcheng@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1553643D48 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:52:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tfcheng@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id l1so385585nzf for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 07:52:15 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=BkKxPtiHzzepEEWjMVoY2aAq+vIb+92CehqBuz6kZibiauvZ0oy/8BBykuWLR5YGcJXrQr35Xd/Zl2Z6cRUmJWZKhSnwuhOKGsNNiZ3ckCIHpgeEeLOSxCJTmTJF0KZFB3mNPcScrXGG3DijhItI+SELyNqMAYLtxZuhnfYwFsk= Received: by 10.36.22.15 with SMTP id 15mr1984356nzv; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 07:52:15 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.13.7 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 07:52:15 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:52:15 -0500 From: Tsu-Fan Cheng To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: x server abort X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:52:16 -0000 hi, these days I encountered some problem with my xorg 6.8 server. What I remember now is that after I upgrade my apps by "portmanager -u", somehow the X server failed during the launch of some apps, like bzflag and vmd. I checked the xorg.log file, and the only thing I got is: [snip] (WW) fcntl(10, O_ASYNC): Inappropriate ioctl for device *** If unresolved symbols were reported above, they might not *** be the reason for the server aborting. Fatal server error: Caught signal 11. Server aborting Please consult the The X.Org Foundation support at http://wiki.X.Org for help. Please also check the log file at "/var/log/Xorg.0.log" for additional information. [snip] not so much to debug. I am running 6.0-STABLE and all my xorg installation are current as checked by portmanager. The only old install is xorg-fontserver-6.8.2, which has a newer version as 6.8.2_1, thx!! TFC From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 15:53:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9F9016A420 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:53:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cgross@2blc.Com) Received: from bruce.cnv.fr (bruce.cnv.fr [84.96.23.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF6A943D4C for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:53:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cgross@2blc.Com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bruce.cnv.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBE706D667; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:53:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from bruce.cnv.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (bruce.cnv.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 13532-06; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:52:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from PRTCEDRICXP (prt-cedricxp.cnv.local [10.0.0.31]) by bruce.cnv.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D0CF6F19C; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:52:51 +0100 (CET) From: "cedric Gross" To: , Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:53:50 +0100 Organization: 2BLC MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 In-Reply-To: thread-index: AcYXkFoKNnnLL7nYRpy06e6TsnjRTgAAFPbQ Message-Id: <20060112155251.9D0CF6F19C@bruce.cnv.fr> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at cnv.fr Cc: Subject: RE: IpNat and 3 NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:53:12 -0000 Thanks you, it's working ! But why using vr0 instead of vr1 for map instruction ? Network 192.168.0.32/27 is attach to vr1 not vr0 ... Is it an IPNat mystery or have you an answer ? > -----Message d'origine----- > De : owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org=20 > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] De la part de fbsd_user > Envoy=E9 : jeudi 12 janvier 2006 16:43 > =C0 : cedric Gross; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Objet : RE: IpNat and 3 NIC >=20 > You have ipnat statements wrong. should be liked this >=20 > map vr0 10.0.0.0/8 -> 0.32 proxy port ftp ftp/tcp > map vr0 10.0.0.0/8 -> 0.32 portmap tcp/udp 20000:60000 > map vr0 10.0.0.0/8 -> 0.32 > map vr0 192.168.0.0/30 -> 0.32 portmap tcp/udp auto > map vr0 192.168.0.32/27 -> 0.32 portmap tcp/udp auto > map vr0 192.168.0.32/27 -> 0.32 > map vr0 192.168.0.96/27 -> 0.32 portmap tcp/udp auto > map vr0 192.168.0.96/27 -> 0.32 > rdr xl0 0.0.0.0/0 port 80 -> 10.0.0.254 port 3128 tcp > rdr vr1 192.168.0.32/27 port 80 -> 10.0.0.254 port 3128 tcp > rdr vr1 192.168.0.96/27 port 80 -> 10.0.0.254 port 3128 tcp >=20 > Note map vr1 has been changed to vr0 >=20 > If your public IP 84.96.23.106 is not dedicated to you by your ISP, > then you should not be hard coding it in your IPnat rules. Read the > Freebsd ipfilter documentation in the handbook for details. >=20 > 0.32 =3D The IP address/netmask assigned by your ISP. > The special keyword 0.32 tells ipnat to get the current > public > IP address of the interface specified on this statement and > substitute it for the 0.32 keyword. >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of cedric > Gross > Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 9:58 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: IpNat and 3 NIC >=20 >=20 > Hello, >=20 > I have my FreeBSD 5.4 box with 3 NIC : >=20 > Xl0 LAN with network 10.0.0.0/8 and 192.168.0.0/30 > VR0 Wan 84.96.23.106/32 > VR1 LAN with network 192.168.0.32/27 and 192.168.0.96/27 >=20 > I use IPNAT and Ip filter. >=20 > I'm doing NAT from Xl0 to Vr0, it's working fine >=20 > I'm trying to do the same thing with vr1 to Vr0 but it's seems that > traffic > coming from vr1 are not translated. > Is there a interface limitation with IPNAT ? >=20 > Is there a way to do translation from both NIC ? >=20 > Here is my ipnat.conf : > map vr0 10.0.0.0/8 -> 84.96.23.106/32 proxy port ftp ftp/tcp > map vr0 10.0.0.0/8 -> 84.96.23.106/32 portmap tcp/udp 20000:60000 > map vr0 10.0.0.0/8 -> 84.96.23.106/32 > map vr0 192.168.0.0/30 -> 84.96.23.106/32 portmap tcp/udp auto > map vr1 192.168.0.32/27 -> 84.96.23.106/32 portmap tcp/udp auto > map vr1 192.168.0.32/27 -> 84.96.23.106/32 > map vr1 192.168.0.96/27 -> 84.96.23.106/32 portmap tcp/udp auto > map vr1 192.168.0.96/27 -> 84.96.23.106/32 > rdr xl0 0.0.0.0/0 port 80 -> 10.0.0.254 port 3128 tcp > rdr vr1 192.168.0.32/27 port 80 -> 10.0.0.254 port 3128 tcp > rdr vr1 192.168.0.96/27 port 80 -> 10.0.0.254 port 3128 tcp >=20 > Thanks for help. > Cedric >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to=20 > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 16:26:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B9DD16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:26:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jfreeze@freeze.org) Received: from freeze.org (www.freeze.org [67.78.64.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAB9943D55 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:26:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jfreeze@freeze.org) Received: from freeze.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freeze.org (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k0CGVQmv059105 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:31:26 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jfreeze@freeze.org) Received: (from jfreeze@localhost) by freeze.org (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id k0CGVPqx059104 for questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:31:25 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jfreeze) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:31:25 -0500 From: Jim Freeze To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060112163125.GA58992@freeze.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i Cc: Subject: Looking for SW Firewall X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:26:43 -0000 Hi I am interested implementing a firewall in SW that has similar features as a Cisco PIX firewall. But, I don't want to roll my own ipfw statements. A nice gui would be nice. From the ports index I see things like: dante-1.1.15 A circuit-level firewall/proxy cp2fwb-0.6 Checkpoint FW1 to Firewall Builder ruleset converter fwbuilder-2.0.10 Firewall Builder GUI and policy compilers hlfl-0.60.1 High Level Firewall Language libfwbuilder-2.0.10_1 Firewall Builder API pfw-0.6.2 A web frontend for the pf firewall I'm basically looking for a good firewall that has an easy administration interface. Can someone who has experience with this suggest a fw I should try? Thanks -- Jim Freeze From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 16:27:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95EF416A423 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:27:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from sccrmhc14.comcast.net (sccrmhc14.comcast.net [204.127.202.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD99543D49 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:27:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-24-118-173-219.hsd1.mn.comcast.net[24.118.173.219]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc14) with ESMTP id <2006011216275601400f3c7qe>; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:27:56 +0000 From: Josh Paetzel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:27:55 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <200601101604.55833.josh@tcbug.org> <4dd4cddf0601110443r5e726a86t@mail.gmail.com> <282b2dd90601120225x39403341mf7a01f37837791ee@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <282b2dd90601120225x39403341mf7a01f37837791ee@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Multipart/Mixed; boundary="Boundary-00=_LOoxD7mL2A/UciU" Message-Id: <200601121027.55758.josh@tcbug.org> X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Joseph Kerian Subject: Re: Slow 2d performance in X / opera / nvidia drivers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:27:59 -0000 --Boundary-00=_LOoxD7mL2A/UciU Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 12 January 2006 04:25 am, Joseph Kerian wrote: > On 1/11/06, Martin Tournoy wrote: > > On 10/01/06, Josh Paetzel wrote: > > *many helpful attachments snipped* > > > > I've been having terrible 2d performance with opera > > > (linux-opera and native 8.51 and 9.0) using the nvidia drivers. > > > When I windowshade it and then restore it there is a sizeable > > > delay while it redraws the window. If I rapidly shade and > > > restore the window my idle CPU time goes to 0% and mp3 playback > > > will occassionally skip. > > > > > > The problem first started when Opera 8 was released, I hoped > > > that further releases would address it but so far that has not > > > been the case. Any suggestions for a fix welcome. > > > > > > (Yes, I have been seeking support on opera.com but this feels > > > like a FreeBSD mis-configuration of some sort on my end. :) > > > > You might try turning the twinview of, it takes up heaps of > > resources on my machine, then again, your machine has 300% more > > RAM and clockspeed, so it should be able to handle it fine.... > > > > Try using freebsd AGP, the nvidia should work better but you > > might want to try it anyway... > > The other useful file for this might be your Xorg log. > > > Which window manager do you use, I noted that KDE can be really, > > really slow even on newer machines (Krap Desktop Enviorment) > > *bites the troll* > > > Is this problem ONLY with opera? or with other applications to? > > if you have another QT application you might want try how that > > runs. Also check you QT version, maybe it's ancient? > > > > Did you try using both the static/shared QT versions? If not, it > > might make a diffrence. > > I haven't had this problem at all with Opera on the ports KDE, > using a far inferior nvidia card. > I have had a bit of shared library wierdness, but Opera simply > refused to run until I fixed that. > > If this is a PCI-Express card, note the discussion of 3d > performance here: > http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=59981 Well, I think I may have found the problem but can't seem to find a fix to test my theory. Xorg is loading Xinerama and I've found some noise via google that there is a 'nvidia-xinerama' that is faster than the native 'xorg-xinerama'. I've tried disabling xinerama in my Xorg conf file but it loads anyways. Attached is my xorg.log -- Thanks, Josh Paetzel --Boundary-00=_LOoxD7mL2A/UciU-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 16:29:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E9AD16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:29:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cracauer@schlepper.zs64.net) Received: from schlepper.zs64.net (schlepper.zs64.net [212.12.50.230]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD4B543D5C for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:29:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cracauer@schlepper.zs64.net) Received: from schlepper.zs64.net (schlepper [212.12.50.230]) by schlepper.zs64.net (8.13.3/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k0CGTGfS016464; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:29:16 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from cracauer@schlepper.zs64.net) Received: (from cracauer@localhost) by schlepper.zs64.net (8.13.3/8.12.9/Submit) id k0CGTFIp016463; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:29:15 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from cracauer) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:29:15 -0500 From: Martin Cracauer To: Danial Thom Message-ID: <20060112112915.A16360@cons.org> References: <20060111191224.A93090@cons.org> <20060112141925.91320.qmail@web33307.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <20060112141925.91320.qmail@web33307.mail.mud.yahoo.com>; from danial_thom@yahoo.com on Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 06:19:25AM -0800 Cc: "Marc G. Fournier" , Martin Cracauer , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Dual Core vs HyperThreading vs Dual CPU X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:29:19 -0000 > > I have benchmarks comparing dual-core 939 > > socket systems against dual > > 940 socket systems here: > > > http://cracauer-forum.cons.org/forum/crabench.html > > Just a question about your benches, any reason > you just don't ship files to /dev/null? That was > always the standard in unix to get the disk out > of it. I am not sure what specific test you are referring to, but in general I avoid using /dev/null as a sink like the plague. Speed on /dev/null varies drastically between OSes, and sometimes between kernel versions (e.g. SMP and non-SMP kernel). In combination with other load it becomes unpredictable. Any benchmark doing dd of=/dev/null is bogus IMHO. My cstream utility has a build-in disgard option which avoids this problem. Martin -- %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% Martin Cracauer http://www.cons.org/cracauer/ FreeBSD - where you want to go, today. http://www.freebsd.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 16:35:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B6F016A420 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:35:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (dc.cis.okstate.edu [139.78.100.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E69F543D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:35:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (localhost.cis.okstate.edu [127.0.0.1]) by dc.cis.okstate.edu (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k0CGZ2hn025757 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:35:02 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Message-Id: <200601121635.k0CGZ2hn025757@dc.cis.okstate.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:35:02 -0600 From: Martin McCormick Subject: Strange Failure Mode in FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:35:03 -0000 I built a FreeBSD 4.11 system recently which is to be remotely installed in another town. The system worked on our network while I tested it and installed several ports, etc. We then moved it to the town where it is supposed to live and now, there's big trouble. The Ethernet interface, known as em0 on this system, comes up According to all the messages. If, however, you try to use it, it is as dead as a stone. If I try to ping the local host from root, I get this: ping: sendto: Permission denied ping: sendto: Permission denied ping: sendto: Permission denied I get the same response when trying to ping real hosts over the network. Pinging that system from a known good system is like pinging a disconnected Ethernet jack in that absolutely nothing happens. I am lucky in that I can get in to this system via a serial cable from the known good system so I can see the world from the bad box, but I have frankly never seen this mode of failure before and am at a loss as to what to look at. It had worked perfectly here and all our folks in the other town did was plug it in and hook up the Ethernet. I am glad I sort of have 60-mile-long arms right now, but this is not good. If I do an ifconfig em0, the settings return as they were set in rc.conf. The router address is correct and the fact that one can't ping 127.0.0.1 either tells me that something really nasty happened somewhere along the way. Any ideas as to what I can test next? Thank you. Martin McCormick WB5AGZ Stillwater, OK OSU Information Technology Department Network Operations Group From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 17:00:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BA8316A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:00:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Received: from mail.scls.lib.wi.us (mail.scls.lib.wi.us [198.150.40.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3D5043D46 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:00:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Received: from [172.26.2.238] ([172.26.2.238]) by mail.scls.lib.wi.us (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k0CH04R4077467; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:00:04 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Message-ID: <43C68B13.5020001@scls.lib.wi.us> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:00:03 -0600 From: Greg Barniskis User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin McCormick References: <200601121635.k0CGZ2hn025757@dc.cis.okstate.edu> In-Reply-To: <200601121635.k0CGZ2hn025757@dc.cis.okstate.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Strange Failure Mode in FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:00:07 -0000 Martin McCormick wrote: > I built a FreeBSD 4.11 system recently which is to be remotely > installed in another town. The system worked on our network while I > tested it and installed several ports, etc. We then moved it to the > town where it is supposed to live and now, there's big trouble. > > The Ethernet interface, known as em0 on this system, comes up > According to all the messages. If, however, you try to use it, it is > as dead as a stone. If I try to ping the local host from root, I get this: > > ping: sendto: Permission denied > ping: sendto: Permission denied > ping: sendto: Permission denied > > I get the same response when trying to ping real hosts over > the network. This smells like ipfw denial -- at least, that is the exact same message I get on a box where ICMP is blocked by ipfw rules. When it shipped, did your new box go into an IP range for which ipfw rules (or other filter) would apply, where maybe they did not previously apply on your build/test network? > Pinging that system from a known good system is like pinging a > disconnected Ethernet jack in that absolutely nothing happens. If I'm right, you'll see that something happens, in at least the target IP address is ARPed for and you should see the target's MAC in the arp table on the known good system, even if the pings never return. That should at least give you confidence that the NIC in question is functioning insofar as it responds to an ARP request. tcpdump is possibly your friend as well here. -- Greg Barniskis, Computer Systems Integrator South Central Library System (SCLS) Library Interchange Network (LINK) , (608) 266-6348 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 17:06:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B03C16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:06:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from amr.basyouny@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 146AD43D48 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:06:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from amr.basyouny@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i14so394455wra for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:06:07 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=mwQ8XrG1yVWCy76DYd3DMuWHX6rmQhV0paqxigHJhGXS0YmtHwb+fpKTbC/7t584V5UyOQH4iaKooYl4z3TgQEgfxKc3/r6iVshO0xXCPvh0pr6xPy9vWUdEWbSP7gct9uHNRZuwnq5s6hzTKD4ntknhmp2qQFcfMMRXgsUCb0k= Received: by 10.54.136.12 with SMTP id j12mr3871992wrd; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:06:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.131.9 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:06:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <669d762f0601120906w28c8585eh430a763f9cc5379@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:06:07 +0200 From: Amr Basyouny To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Important .... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:06:08 -0000 *CONGRATULATION ...* Your site had been choiesd to have the great discount ... Translate the Whole web site Into ( Franch - Russian - Italy - Arabic ) . That include web design and the whole web site translate and upload in two weeks from order plus 3 monthes updating or adding data free PLUS ( Time Limit Offer ) : Free 24 Hours / Day Arabic Live Support .. for 2 monthes ... And we are responsable for translate any quistion or answer to support in a Ticket or E-mail From / To any user for a year .... 24 hours / day live Arabic Phone Support For live time . ---------------------------------------------------------------------------= - Contact me for any adition Data ... Amr Basyouny Egypt +20121747071 amr.basyouny@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 17:07:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F9F016A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:07:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5249C43D67 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:07:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from xfb52@dial.pipex.com) Received: from [192.168.0.2] ([82.41.34.87]) by smtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk with Microsoft SMTPSVC(5.0.2195.6713); Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:08:08 +0000 Message-ID: <43C68CBC.7020007@dial.pipex.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:07:08 +0000 From: Alex Zbyslaw User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-GB; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051106 X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin McCormick References: <200601121635.k0CGZ2hn025757@dc.cis.okstate.edu> In-Reply-To: <200601121635.k0CGZ2hn025757@dc.cis.okstate.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Jan 2006 17:08:08.0287 (UTC) FILETIME=[C28A16F0:01C6179A] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Strange Failure Mode in FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:07:14 -0000 Martin McCormick wrote: > The Ethernet interface, known as em0 on this system, comes up >According to all the messages. If, however, you try to use it, it is >as dead as a stone. If I try to ping the local host from root, I get this: > >ping: sendto: Permission denied >ping: sendto: Permission denied >ping: sendto: Permission denied > >[...] > If I do an ifconfig em0, the settings return as they were set >in rc.conf. The router address is correct and the fact that one can't >ping 127.0.0.1 either tells me that something really nasty happened >somewhere along the way. > > Maybe someone will just tell you an answer, but in case not can you actually post the output of ifconfig -a and all the em0 stuff from dmesg.boot? Off the cuff, are you *sure* an ethernet cable is actually plugged in and that it is a known working cable? Note sure why that would scotch localhost, though. --Alex From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 17:09:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F082016A422 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:09:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (dc.cis.okstate.edu [139.78.100.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A256443D75 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:08:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (localhost.cis.okstate.edu [127.0.0.1]) by dc.cis.okstate.edu (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k0CH8whn070072 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:08:58 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Message-Id: <200601121708.k0CH8whn070072@dc.cis.okstate.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:08:58 -0600 From: Martin McCormick Subject: Re: Strange Failure Mode in FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:09:05 -0000 Greg Barniskis writes: >If I'm right, you'll see that something happens, in at least the >target IP address is ARPed for and you should see the target's MAC >in the arp table on the known good system, even if the pings never >return. That should at least give you confidence that the NIC in >question is functioning insofar as it responds to an ARP request. Thanks for your response. I just went in to single-user mode and got em0 to configure (same as before), but now, I can ping another host on the same subnet. I will try all your suggestions and also temporarily turn off ipfw. I did look at the rules and I did remember to change them to fit the new address when the system left here. If that's it, I should have a working system all be it a totally open system. I will let you know what happens. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 17:10:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 639FA16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:10:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from wolf.pjkh.com (wolf.pjkh.com [66.228.196.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0C1643D86 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:10:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wolf.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBBA9172A5; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:10:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from wolf.pjkh.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (wolf.pjkh.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 50601-06; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:10:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by wolf.pjkh.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4C79C172A4; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:10:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wolf.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 469C8170B0; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:10:52 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:10:52 -0800 (PST) From: Philip Hallstrom To: Jim Freeze In-Reply-To: <20060112163125.GA58992@freeze.org> Message-ID: <20060112091036.U51550@wolf.pjkh.com> References: <20060112163125.GA58992@freeze.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at pjkh.com Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Looking for SW Firewall X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:10:57 -0000 > I am interested implementing a firewall in SW that has similar > features as a Cisco PIX firewall. But, I don't want to roll > my own ipfw statements. A nice gui would be nice. From the > ports index I see things like: > > > dante-1.1.15 A circuit-level firewall/proxy > cp2fwb-0.6 Checkpoint FW1 to Firewall Builder ruleset converter > fwbuilder-2.0.10 Firewall Builder GUI and policy compilers > hlfl-0.60.1 High Level Firewall Language > libfwbuilder-2.0.10_1 Firewall Builder API > pfw-0.6.2 A web frontend for the pf firewall > > I'm basically looking for a good firewall that has an easy administration > interface. > > Can someone who has experience with this suggest a fw I should try? Never used it, but seems monowall comes up a lot... http://www.m0n0.ch/wall/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 17:18:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7580E16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:18:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bmcgover@cisco.com) Received: from rtp-iport-1.cisco.com (rtp-iport-1.cisco.com [64.102.122.148]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E751643D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:18:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bmcgover@cisco.com) Received: from rtp-core-2.cisco.com ([64.102.124.13]) by rtp-iport-1.cisco.com with ESMTP; 12 Jan 2006 09:18:58 -0800 X-BrightmailFiltered: true X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA== X-IronPort-AV: i="3.99,360,1131350400"; d="scan'208"; a="19609469:sNHT25197104" Received: from xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com (xbh-rtp-201.cisco.com [64.102.31.12]) by rtp-core-2.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k0CHIK6p014772 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:18:56 -0500 (EST) Received: from xmb-rtp-205.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.59]) by xbh-rtp-201.amer.cisco.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:18:59 -0500 Received: from 161.44.65.241 ([161.44.65.241]) by xmb-rtp-205.amer.cisco.com ([64.102.31.59]) via Exchange Front-End Server email.cisco.com ([64.102.31.21]) with Microsoft Exchange Server HTTP-DAV ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:18:44 +0000 Received: from bmcgover-laptop.cisco.com by email.cisco.com; 12 Jan 2006 12:18:49 -0500 From: "Brian J. McGovern" To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Organization: Cisco Systems Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:18:49 -0500 Message-Id: <1137086329.21361.1.camel@bmcgover-laptop.cisco.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Jan 2006 17:18:59.0626 (UTC) FILETIME=[46C488A0:01C6179C] Cc: Subject: VMware 5.5 w/FreeBSD as host OS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bmcgover@cisco.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:18:59 -0000 All, I'm just curious, given the Linux support, if anyone is running VMware 5.5 with FreeBSD as the host operating system. VMware claims they "don't support it", but history has repeatedly shown me that "not supported" is not the same as "doesn't work". Feedback? -B From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 17:20:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 305BB16A420 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:20:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fatcat1985@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A3A43D49 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:20:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fatcat1985@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id l1so405476nzf for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:20:23 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=eqxLHvYB9SYroUNu0teCwQz0tGjNdG/CZKFKCcV4O2+DVOi/vR4j3B22wTG/oWSi3dKinrjYYToY+6gA7/6xjYIHn3++V9YPwloOdi3/h7vptuX3Qwx32+WvqUD1lb0wTK1nXx9N5+9KsIJIz+JTgtcJn4ZOy5fRMEcS0HoJqZ8= Received: by 10.37.2.71 with SMTP id e71mr2086052nzi; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:20:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.5.1 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:20:23 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3d92e2330601120920i3b3083eh@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 01:20:23 +0800 From: =?GB2312?B?19O6xA==?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060112120057.CCBF516A41F@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060112120057.CCBF516A41F@hub.freebsd.org> Subject: Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 121, Issue 11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:20:30 -0000 I have two PCs, one with windows installed and another one is a laptop that contains no cdrom and floppy drivers. I would like use my windows pc to boot and install a freebsd system on my laptop. My lapton have a network card supporting booting from network. I knew that PXE maybe a possible way to slove it ,however , i could not find a proper image for my network card ( Intel 8255x). And I do search among the Internet and look up among the freebsd handbook. The progress that be described in handbook about pxeboot(8) does not fit me because I have to use a windows OS to boot my laptop. Does anyone could help me ? Thanks for your reply. P.S.: I am a chinese that do not master English, so maybe I could not present my idea clear, if so , do tell me and I will represent it as soon as possible. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 17:25:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3A8016A420 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:25:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nicklas@dinpris.no) Received: from dp-mail-01.dinpris.com (dp-mail-01.dinpris.com [62.73.247.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 662B743D48 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:25:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nicklas@dinpris.no) Received: (qmail 24019 invoked by uid 1004); 12 Jan 2006 17:52:13 -0000 Received: from 62.73.247.155 by dp-mail-01.dinpris.com (envelope-from , uid 98) with qmail-scanner-1.25 (clamdscan: 0.86.2/1237. spamassassin: 3.1.0-rc1. perlscan: 1.25. Clear:RC:1(62.73.247.155):. Processed in 0.095311 secs); 12 Jan 2006 17:52:13 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Mail-From: nicklas@dinpris.no via dp-mail-01.dinpris.com X-Qmail-Scanner: 1.25 (Clear:RC:1(62.73.247.155):. Processed in 0.095311 secs) Received: from 529c-tbg7-5fl.oslo.dinpris.com (HELO ?62.73.247.155?) (nicklas@dinpris.no@62.73.247.155) by dp-mail-01.dinpris.com with SMTP; 12 Jan 2006 17:52:13 -0000 Message-ID: <43C69115.6010802@dinpris.no> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:25:41 +0100 From: "Nicklas B. Westerlund" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bmcgover@cisco.com References: <1137086329.21361.1.camel@bmcgover-laptop.cisco.com> In-Reply-To: <1137086329.21361.1.camel@bmcgover-laptop.cisco.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VMware 5.5 w/FreeBSD as host OS? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:25:22 -0000 Brian J. McGovern wrote: >All, >VMware claims they "don't >support it", but history has repeatedly shown me that "not supported" is >not the same as "doesn't work". > Brian, "not supported" means that if you use it, and it fails, you can't blame VMware :-) Personally, I've seen that their ESX server works with FreeBSD (Atleast 4.x in UP mode) as guest OS, but never as host OS - so in that area I cannot help you. - Nick. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 17:26:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7C3E16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:26:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dimitar.vassilev@gmail.com) Received: from uproxy.gmail.com (uproxy.gmail.com [66.249.92.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6C4C43D67 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:26:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dimitar.vassilev@gmail.com) Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id o2so142299uge for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:26:25 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=GQFOtDq3Mbkx+V0f4rv/SpU//X8NDObxgdVpP1JNjmZGoN6Z7tlQuPAwncYUZObGUoxU0maCGEuFEsKbkfT7g13F5xk0i4rQVIKcPAVqVJb8tUcS5sJByti4Y9dy618OkY2XAGuiHrqmLz4lbY3QFm+BqvUzUCddDIeDckoqAsE= Received: by 10.66.240.17 with SMTP id n17mr887399ugh; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:26:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.66.238.17 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:26:24 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <59adc1a0601120926q417acc3ai@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:26:24 +0100 From: Dimitar Vasilev To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-5 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: i810 on TP-Z60m X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:26:30 -0000 SGVsbG8hCkkgaGF2ZSBhIGludGVsIDkxNUdNIG9uIGEgWi02MG0gd2l0aCBTLVZpZGVvIG91dC4K WCBzdGFydHMsIGJ1dCB0aGVuIEknbSB0aHJvd24gYmFjayB0byB0aGUgY29uc29sZS4KVGhlIGVy cm9yIGlzOiAiTm8gbWF0Y2hpbmcgZGV2aWNlIHNlY3Rpb24gZm9yIGluc3RhbmNlIEJVUyBJRCBQ Q0k6MDoyOjEKZm91bmQiCkkgZ29vZ2xlZCBhcm91bmQgYW5kIHNhdyBzZXZlcmFsIHZhcmlhbnRz IHRvIHRyeS4KSWYgeW91IGhhdmUgYSB3b3JraW5nIHNvbHV0aW9uIHBsZWFzZSBsZXQgbWUga25v dy4KQWxzbzogRG9lcyBhbnlvbmUga25vdyBob3cgdG8gZmlyZSB1cCBTb3VuZE1BWCBpbnRlZ3Jh dGVkPwpXaGVuIEkgZW50ZXIga2xkbG9hZCBzbmRfZHJpdmVyLCBubyBkZXZpY2Ugc291bmQgaW4g a2VybmVsLCBJIGdvdApwcGMwOiBjYW5ub3QgcmVzZXJ2ZSBJL08gcG9ydC4KQmVzdCByZWdhcmRz LAoKLS0KtNjc2OLq4CCy0OHY29XSCkRpbWl0YXIgVmFzc2lsZXYKCkdudVBHIGtleSBJRDogMHg0 QjhEQjUyNQpLZXlzZXJ2ZXI6IHBncC5taXQuZWR1CktleSBmaW5nZXJwcmludDogRDg4QSAzQjky IERFRDUgOTE3RSAzNDFFIEQ2MkYgOEM1MSA1RkM0IDRCOEQgQjUyNQo= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 17:33:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB5D916A420 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:33:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from budojeepr@yahoo.com) Received: from web31014.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web31014.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.201.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7FBCB43D55 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:33:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from budojeepr@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 53841 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Jan 2006 17:33:37 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=p2BgeQW7YMAURRnGPF51UIviJI1ZBzsjugGnexb43z+siv0g48k2pKCez/79ZdwX0c3Z3zJl847WDpdr3dmFagRpbkCseLdkbF02uEA2nQ2uEMsSAY9AacSowwktbbAaxxmA8DXvd5AbvbSfurZAbvDCADGzkw2+moc6Gx7xMko= ; Message-ID: <20060112173337.53839.qmail@web31014.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [209.76.69.106] by web31014.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:33:37 PST Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:33:37 -0800 (PST) From: Brad Marsh To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Help with panic: vm_fault X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:33:44 -0000 Howdy, I just added RAM to my computer, and upon boot I get a panic. I'm enclosing the debug session script output, but first a bit of background... The computer has two slots for DIMMs, and was using both before, with generic 256MB sticks. I removed both of those and put in two 512MB sticks of Kingston PC2700 RAM - and that's when I got the panic. Test 1 - switch the positions of the sticks (swap slots). Same result. Test 2 - Remove one stick. Successful boot. Test 3 - Put that same stick in the other slot. Successful boot. Tests 4, 5 - Repeat tests 2 and 3 with the other stick. Successful boots, both. Test 6 - One 512MB stick and one old 26MB stick. Successful boot. Test 7 - Swap slots. Successful boot. Tests 8, 9, 10, 11 - various combinations of sticks and slots. Successful boots, all. Also, I added a swap file so that I'd have a bit over 3GB swap space. I'm including swapinfo output at the bottom... So my comclusion is that FreeBSD is having trouble booting with 2 512MB RAM sticks. The BIOS recognizes the RAM ok (see the debug out put, below). Help? Thank you... *** Script started on Thu Jan 12 08:25:18 2006 %kgdb kernel.debug.0 vmcore.0 [GDB will not be able to debug user-mode threads: /usr/lib/libthread_db.so: Undefined symbol "ps_pglobal_lookup"] GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] ... This GDB was configured as "i386-marcel-freebsd". Unread portion of the kernel message buffer: Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Wed Jan 11 11:05:20 PST 2006 brad@freebsd.ceronline.com:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/DEBUG Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.80GHz (2806.38-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf41 Stepping = 1 Features=0xbfebfbff Features2=0x441d> real memory = 1040121856 (991 MB) avail memory = 1013084160 (966 MB) ACPI APIC Table: ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard netsmb_dev: loaded npx0: [FAST] npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: Power Button (fixed) pci_link0: irq 10 on acpi0 pci_link1: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link2: irq 11 on acpi0 pci_link3: irq 5 on acpi0 pci_link4: irq 11 on acpi0 pci_link5: irq 6 on acpi0 pci_link6: irq 0 on acpi0 pci_link7: irq 9 on acpi0 Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x1008-0x100b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 acpi_button0: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff,0x480-0x48f,0x1000-0x10bf,0x10c0-0x10ff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 agp0: mem 0xe8000000-0xebffffff at device 0.0 on pci0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pci1: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) isab0: at device 2.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0x4000-0x400f at device 2.5 on pci0 ata0: on atapci0 ata1: on atapci0 pcm0: port 0xe000-0xe0ff,0xe100-0xe17f irq 18 at device 2.7 on pci0 pcm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] pcm0: ohci0: mem 0xec100000-0xec100fff irq 20 at device 3.0 on pci0 ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb0: SMM does not respond, resetting usb0: on ohci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: SiS OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered ohci1: mem 0xec101000-0xec101fff irq 21 at device 3.1 on pci0 ohci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb1: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb1: SMM does not respond, resetting usb1: on ohci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: SiS OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered ehci0: mem 0xec102000-0xec102fff irq 23 at device 3.3 on pci0 ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] usb2: EHCI version 1.0 usb2: companion controllers, 3 ports each: usb0 usb1 usb2: on ehci0 usb2: USB revision 2.0 uhub2: SiS EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 6 ports with 6 removable, self powered rl0: port 0xe200-0xe2ff mem 0xec103000-0xec1030ff irq 18 at device 15.0 on pci0 miibus0: on rl0 rlphy0: on miibus0 rlphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto rl0: Ethernet address: 00:30:1b:3e:a4:06 pci0: at device 16.0 (no driver attached) acpi_tz0: on acpi0 sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 16550A sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 sio1: type 16550A ppc0: port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on acpi0 ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode ppbus0: on ppc0 plip0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] pmtimer0 on isa0 orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xcbfff,0xcc000-0xcffff on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 uhub0: device problem (SET_ADDR_FAILED), disabling port 1 Timecounter "TSC" frequency 2806380287 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec ad0: 57259MB at ata0-master UDMA133 ad1: 76319MB at ata0-slave UDMA100 acd0: CDROM at ata1-master UDMA33 Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a <118>Loading configuration files. <118>kernel dumps on /dev/ad0s1b <118>Entropy harvesting: <118> interrupts <118> ethernet <118> point_to_point <118> kickstart <118>. <118>swapon: adding /dev/ad0s1b as swap device panic: vm_fault: fault on nofault entry, addr: e0c19000 KDB: enter: panic panic: from debugger Uptime: 1s Dumping 991 MB (2 chunks) chunk 0: 1MB (159 pages) ... ok chunk 1: 991MB (253680 pages) 975 959 943 927 911 895 879 863 847 831 815 799 783 767 751 735 719 703 687 671 655 639 623 607 591 575 559 543 527 511 495 479 463 447 431 415 399 383 367 351 335 319 303 287 271 255 239 223 207 191 175 159 143 127 111 95 79 63 47 31 15 #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:165 165 pcpu.h: No such file or directory. in pcpu.h (kgdb) where #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:165 #1 0xc0503f22 in boot (howto=260) at ../../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:399 #2 0xc05041e8 in panic (fmt=0xc065ef0a "from debugger") at ../../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:555 #3 0xc044c4cd in db_panic (addr=-1068383073, have_addr=0, count=-1, modif=0xeab419c0 "") at ../../../ddb/db_command.c:438 #4 0xc044c464 in db_command (last_cmdp=0xc06bc1e4, cmd_table=0x0, aux_cmd_tablep=0xc0685d50, aux_cmd_tablep_end=0xc0685d54) at ../../../ddb/db_command.c:350 #5 0xc044c52c in db_command_loop () at ../../../ddb/db_command.c:458 #6 0xc044e139 in db_trap (type=3, code=0) at ../../../ddb/db_main.c:221 #7 0xc051c71b in kdb_trap (type=3, code=0, tf=0xeab41b00) at ../../../kern/subr_kdb.c:473 #8 0xc063c2dc in trap (frame= {tf_fs = -357302264, tf_es = -1068433368, tf_ds = -1067057112, tf_edi = 1, tf_esi = -1066949029, tf_ebp = -357295296, tf_isp = -357295316, tf_ebx = -357295252, tf_edx = 0, tf_ecx = -1061072896, tf_eax = 18, tf_trapno = 3, tf_err = 0, tf_eip = -1068383073, tf_cs = 32, tf_eflags = 658, tf_esp = -357295264, tf_ss = -1068482185}) at ../../../i386/i386/trap.c:591 #9 0xc062b66a in calltrap () at ../../../i386/i386/exception.s:139 #10 0xc051c49f in kdb_enter (msg=0x12
) at cpufunc.h:60 #11 0xc0504177 in panic ( fmt=0xc067a65b "vm_fault: fault on nofault entry, addr: %lx") ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- at ../../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:539 #12 0xc05f132c in vm_fault (map=0xc0c43000, vaddr=3770781696, fault_type=2 '\002', fault_flags=0) at ../../../vm/vm_fault.c:277 #13 0xc063c51e in trap_pfault (frame=0xeab41ca4, usermode=0, eva=3770782502) at ../../../i386/i386/trap.c:731 #14 0xc063c169 in trap (frame= {tf_fs = -1068367864, tf_es = -1039269848, tf_ds = 40, tf_edi = -1039246336, tf_esi = 0, tf_ebp = -357294800, tf_isp = -357294896, tf_ebx = -1039251408, tf_edx = -1039246336, tf_ecx = -1039428312, tf_eax = -357294916, tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 2, tf_eip = -1067218097, tf_cs = 32, tf_eflags = 66182, tf_esp = -1039246336, tf_ss = -357294844}) at ../../../i386/i386/trap.c:432 #15 0xc062b66a in calltrap () at ../../../i386/i386/exception.s:139 #16 0xc0638b4f in pmap_change_wiring (pmap=0xc20e4830, va=59, wired=0) at ../../../i386/i386/pmap.c:2255 #17 0xc062b6bf in Xint0x80_syscall () at ../../../i386/i386/exception.s:200 #18 0x00000033 in ?? () Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?) (kgdb) q %^Dexit Script done on Thu Jan 12 08:25:40 2006 Device 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity /dev/ad0s1b 1597440 0 1597440 0% /dev/md0 1597440 0 1597440 0% Total 3194880 0 3194880 0% __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 17:43:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27E8816A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:43:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuri@ynet.sk) Received: from kerberos.ynet.sk (proxy.ynet.sk [147.175.168.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CB2F43D7E for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:42:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from yuri@ynet.sk) Received: from kerberos.ynet.sk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kerberos.ynet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EE2912D6F5 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:42:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.ynet.sk (marvin.ynet.sk [147.175.168.50]) by kerberos.ynet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 190B212D6F3 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:42:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.ynet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB6B424684 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:42:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail.ynet.sk ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (marvin.ynet.sk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 14621-01-2 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:42:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from [147.175.170.68] (yuri2.ynet.sk [147.175.170.68]) by mail.ynet.sk (Postfix) with ESMTP id C347724667 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:42:41 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43C694D4.6040009@ynet.sk> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:41:40 +0100 From: Juraj Pisar User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060112173337.53839.qmail@web31014.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <20060112173337.53839.qmail@web31014.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at ynet.sk X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: Re: Help with panic: vm_fault X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:43:01 -0000 Hi Your conclusion is wrong. I'm using 2 512MB sticks of ram without problem... Brad Marsh wrote: > Howdy, > > I just added RAM to my computer, and upon boot I get a panic. I'm > enclosing the debug session script output, but first a bit of > background... > > The computer has two slots for DIMMs, and was using both before, with > generic 256MB sticks. I removed both of those and put in two 512MB > sticks of Kingston PC2700 RAM - and that's when I got the panic. > > Test 1 - switch the positions of the sticks (swap slots). Same result. > Test 2 - Remove one stick. Successful boot. > Test 3 - Put that same stick in the other slot. Successful boot. > Tests 4, 5 - Repeat tests 2 and 3 with the other stick. Successful > boots, both. > Test 6 - One 512MB stick and one old 26MB stick. Successful boot. > Test 7 - Swap slots. Successful boot. > Tests 8, 9, 10, 11 - various combinations of sticks and slots. > Successful boots, all. > > Also, I added a swap file so that I'd have a bit over 3GB swap space. > I'm including swapinfo output at the bottom... > > So my comclusion is that FreeBSD is having trouble booting with 2 512MB > RAM sticks. The BIOS recognizes the RAM ok (see the debug out put, > below). > > Help? Thank you... > > *** > > Script started on Thu Jan 12 08:25:18 2006 > %kgdb kernel.debug.0 vmcore.0 > > [GDB will not be able to debug user-mode threads: > /usr/lib/libthread_db.so: Undefined symbol "ps_pglobal_lookup"] > GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] > ... > This GDB was configured as "i386-marcel-freebsd". > > Unread portion of the kernel message buffer: > Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. > Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, > 1994 > The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. > FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Wed Jan 11 11:05:20 PST 2006 > brad@freebsd.ceronline.com:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/DEBUG > Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 > CPU: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU 2.80GHz (2806.38-MHz 686-class CPU) > Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf41 Stepping = 1 > > Features=0xbfebfbff > Features2=0x441d> > real memory = 1040121856 (991 MB) > avail memory = 1013084160 (966 MB) > ACPI APIC Table: > ioapic0 irqs 0-23 on motherboard > netsmb_dev: loaded > npx0: [FAST] > npx0: on motherboard > npx0: INT 16 interface > acpi0: on motherboard > acpi0: Power Button (fixed) > pci_link0: irq 10 on acpi0 > pci_link1: irq 0 on acpi0 > pci_link2: irq 11 on acpi0 > pci_link3: irq 5 on acpi0 > pci_link4: irq 11 on acpi0 > pci_link5: irq 6 on acpi0 > pci_link6: irq 0 on acpi0 > pci_link7: irq 9 on acpi0 > Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 > acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x1008-0x100b on acpi0 > cpu0: on acpi0 > acpi_button0: on acpi0 > pcib0: port > 0xcf8-0xcff,0x480-0x48f,0x1000-0x10bf,0x10c0-0x10ff on acpi0 > pci0: on pcib0 > agp0: mem 0xe8000000-0xebffffff at device > 0.0 on pci0 > pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 > pci1: on pcib1 > pci1: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) > isab0: at device 2.0 on pci0 > isa0: on isab0 > atapci0: port > 0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0x4000-0x400f at device 2.5 on pci0 > ata0: on atapci0 > ata1: on atapci0 > pcm0: port 0xe000-0xe0ff,0xe100-0xe17f irq 18 at device 2.7 > on pci0 > pcm0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > pcm0: > ohci0: mem 0xec100000-0xec100fff irq 20 at > device 3.0 on pci0 > ohci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support > usb0: SMM does not respond, resetting > usb0: on ohci0 > usb0: USB revision 1.0 > uhub0: SiS OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > uhub0: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered > ohci1: mem 0xec101000-0xec101fff irq 21 at > device 3.1 on pci0 > ohci1: [GIANT-LOCKED] > usb1: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support > usb1: SMM does not respond, resetting > usb1: on ohci1 > usb1: USB revision 1.0 > uhub1: SiS OHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 > uhub1: 3 ports with 3 removable, self powered > ehci0: mem 0xec102000-0xec102fff > irq 23 at device 3.3 on pci0 > ehci0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > usb2: EHCI version 1.0 > usb2: companion controllers, 3 ports each: usb0 usb1 > usb2: on ehci0 > usb2: USB revision 2.0 > uhub2: SiS EHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 2.00/1.00, addr 1 > uhub2: 6 ports with 6 removable, self powered > rl0: port 0xe200-0xe2ff mem > 0xec103000-0xec1030ff irq 18 at device 15.0 on pci0 > miibus0: on rl0 > rlphy0: on miibus0 > rlphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto > rl0: Ethernet address: 00:30:1b:3e:a4:06 > pci0: at device 16.0 (no driver attached) > acpi_tz0: on acpi0 > sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on > acpi0 > sio0: type 16550A > sio1: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on acpi0 > sio1: type 16550A > ppc0: port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on acpi0 > ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode > ppbus0: on ppc0 > plip0: on ppbus0 > lpt0: on ppbus0 > lpt0: Interrupt-driven port > ppi0: on ppbus0 > atkbdc0: port 0x60,0x64 irq 1 on acpi0 > atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 > kbd0 at atkbd0 > atkbd0: [GIANT-LOCKED] > pmtimer0 on isa0 > orm0: at iomem 0xc0000-0xcbfff,0xcc000-0xcffff on > isa0 > sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 > sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> > vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on > isa0 > uhub0: device problem (SET_ADDR_FAILED), disabling port 1 > Timecounter "TSC" frequency 2806380287 Hz quality 800 > Timecounters tick every 1.000 msec > ad0: 57259MB at ata0-master UDMA133 > ad1: 76319MB at ata0-slave UDMA100 > acd0: CDROM at ata1-master UDMA33 > Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a > <118>Loading configuration files. > <118>kernel dumps on /dev/ad0s1b > <118>Entropy harvesting: > <118> interrupts > <118> ethernet > <118> point_to_point > <118> kickstart > <118>. > <118>swapon: adding /dev/ad0s1b as swap device > panic: vm_fault: fault on nofault entry, addr: e0c19000 > KDB: enter: panic > panic: from debugger > Uptime: 1s > Dumping 991 MB (2 chunks) > chunk 0: 1MB (159 pages) ... ok > chunk 1: 991MB (253680 pages) 975 959 943 927 911 895 879 863 847 831 > 815 799 783 767 751 735 719 703 687 671 655 639 623 607 591 575 559 543 > 527 511 495 479 463 447 431 415 399 383 367 351 335 319 303 287 271 255 > 239 223 207 191 175 159 143 127 111 95 79 63 47 31 15 > > #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:165 > 165 pcpu.h: No such file or directory. > in pcpu.h > (kgdb) where > #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:165 > #1 0xc0503f22 in boot (howto=260) at ../../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:399 > #2 0xc05041e8 in panic (fmt=0xc065ef0a "from debugger") > at ../../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:555 > #3 0xc044c4cd in db_panic (addr=-1068383073, have_addr=0, count=-1, > modif=0xeab419c0 "") at ../../../ddb/db_command.c:438 > #4 0xc044c464 in db_command (last_cmdp=0xc06bc1e4, cmd_table=0x0, > aux_cmd_tablep=0xc0685d50, aux_cmd_tablep_end=0xc0685d54) > at ../../../ddb/db_command.c:350 > #5 0xc044c52c in db_command_loop () at ../../../ddb/db_command.c:458 > #6 0xc044e139 in db_trap (type=3, code=0) at > ../../../ddb/db_main.c:221 > #7 0xc051c71b in kdb_trap (type=3, code=0, tf=0xeab41b00) > at ../../../kern/subr_kdb.c:473 > #8 0xc063c2dc in trap (frame= > {tf_fs = -357302264, tf_es = -1068433368, tf_ds = -1067057112, > tf_edi = 1, tf_esi = -1066949029, tf_ebp = -357295296, tf_isp = > -357295316, tf_ebx = -357295252, tf_edx = 0, tf_ecx = -1061072896, > tf_eax = 18, tf_trapno = 3, tf_err = 0, tf_eip = -1068383073, tf_cs = > 32, tf_eflags = 658, tf_esp = -357295264, tf_ss = -1068482185}) at > ../../../i386/i386/trap.c:591 > #9 0xc062b66a in calltrap () at ../../../i386/i386/exception.s:139 > #10 0xc051c49f in kdb_enter (msg=0x12
) > at cpufunc.h:60 > #11 0xc0504177 in panic ( > fmt=0xc067a65b "vm_fault: fault on nofault entry, addr: %lx") > ---Type to continue, or q to quit--- > at ../../../kern/kern_shutdown.c:539 > #12 0xc05f132c in vm_fault (map=0xc0c43000, vaddr=3770781696, > fault_type=2 '\002', fault_flags=0) at ../../../vm/vm_fault.c:277 > #13 0xc063c51e in trap_pfault (frame=0xeab41ca4, usermode=0, > eva=3770782502) > at ../../../i386/i386/trap.c:731 > #14 0xc063c169 in trap (frame= > {tf_fs = -1068367864, tf_es = -1039269848, tf_ds = 40, tf_edi = > -1039246336, tf_esi = 0, tf_ebp = -357294800, tf_isp = -357294896, > tf_ebx = -1039251408, tf_edx = -1039246336, tf_ecx = -1039428312, > tf_eax = -357294916, tf_trapno = 12, tf_err = 2, tf_eip = -1067218097, > tf_cs = 32, tf_eflags = 66182, tf_esp = -1039246336, tf_ss = > -357294844}) at ../../../i386/i386/trap.c:432 > #15 0xc062b66a in calltrap () at ../../../i386/i386/exception.s:139 > #16 0xc0638b4f in pmap_change_wiring (pmap=0xc20e4830, va=59, wired=0) > at ../../../i386/i386/pmap.c:2255 > #17 0xc062b6bf in Xint0x80_syscall () at > ../../../i386/i386/exception.s:200 > #18 0x00000033 in ?? () > Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?) > (kgdb) q > %^Dexit > > Script done on Thu Jan 12 08:25:40 2006 > > Device 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity > /dev/ad0s1b 1597440 0 1597440 0% > /dev/md0 1597440 0 1597440 0% > Total 3194880 0 3194880 0% > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Juraj Pisar - Yuri icq: 268103467 yuri@ynet.sk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 17:44:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 061BE16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:44:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@ferrarishields.com) Received: from mail.ferrarishields.com (mail.ferrarishields.com [216.82.146.20]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE09D43D5C for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:44:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@ferrarishields.com) Received: from dan (dan [10.70.153.5]) by mail.ferrarishields.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7755C7301A; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:44:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <06aa01c6179f$d2015760$0599460a@dan> From: "Dan O'Connor" To: "Philip Hallstrom" , References: <20060111181516.H40477@wolf.pjkh.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:44:21 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=response Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2670 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Cc: Subject: Re: Upgrading a remote box from 5.3 to 6-stable.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:44:03 -0000 > I recently got a leased server that's running 5.3. It's in Texas. > I'm in Washington. I want to upgrade it to 6-STABLE. In the update > docs it says that "when doing a major release upgrade, it is required > that you boot into single user mode to do the installworld." > > Which obviously is a problem. And I find it hard to believe it's > really necessary as this is going to be an issue for a lot of people. > Is this similar to the old recommendation of doing this "unless your > system is relatively quiet"? Although you're not supposed to do it, I upgraded a 5.4 system to 6.0, and several 6.0-RELEASE to 6.0p1, without dropping to single-user mode, and without any problems. But, these are "relatively quite" servers (Apache, Samba, Postfix, Network Gateway) with no other users logged in. YMMV... ~Dan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 17:45:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94E6816A420 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:45:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9E5C43D4C for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:45:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E08BF5DAB; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:45:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 02492-05; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:45:08 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-122-227.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.122.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D255A5D99; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:45:07 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43C695A8.7050906@mac.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:45:12 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Wojciech Puchar References: <20060111112654.O11627@chylonia.3miasto.net> <43C517B7.704@mac.com> <20060112125658.W35216@chylonia.3miasto.net> In-Reply-To: <20060112125658.W35216@chylonia.3miasto.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: limiting Buf memory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:45:10 -0000 Wojciech Puchar wrote: >>> Mem: 529M Active, 209M Inact, 149M Wired, 38M Cache, 109M Buf, 1772K >>> Free >>> >>> while "Cache" is dynamic, Buf is not and never goes down. >>> >>> how can i get it down to somehow like 40MB? >> >> I think "Buf" corresponds to what NetBSD's top calls "File", it's the >> amount of memory that is bufferring raw blocks from the disk. Your >> traditional VM disk cache is the "Cache" entry. >> > possibly you don't understand my question which is - how to set limits > to "Buf" because it's now always 110MB. i Possibly you don't understand your question, either. "Buf" is not a state which is exclusive: that 110MB of memory is comprised of backing store from the disk which is in the Active or Inactive states. hw.physmem - Wired ~= hw.usermem Active + Inactive + Cache + Free ~= hw.usermem It varies based mostly upon the specific tasks being run because it consists mainly the of read-only pure TEXT segments, so there is only one copy underlying in physical RAM, even if multiple instances of a process are running (ie, the same physical page could be mapped into different places in each process address space, commonly used for PIC shared libraries). If you really want to reduce the amount of RAM the system uses, you can set hw.physmem="256M" or whatever in /boot/loader.conf to force the system to not use all of the physical RAM available. If you want to tune the VM disk cache, see "man tuning" and "sysctl vm". -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 17:50:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AE1216A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:50:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from awebster@connectalk.com) Received: from esafe.connectalk.com (esafe.connectalk.com [204.19.165.17]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B378243D4C for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:50:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from awebster@connectalk.com) Received: from connectalk.com ([10.125.204.14]) by eSafe SMTP Relay 1136385415; Thu Jan 12 12:47:22 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:50:20 -0500 Message-ID: <9D61D69E3C1F7F459C5513AD830EE2192BC1EE@mtlex01.connectalk.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Looking for SW Firewall Thread-Index: AcYXlU9DJmMclOBdSWKGDNi+e4bVSgACzNVA From: "Webster, Andrew" To: "Jim Freeze" , X-ESAFE-STATUS: Mail clean X-ESAFE-DETAILS: Clean Cc: Subject: RE: Looking for SW Firewall X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:50:23 -0000 I highly recommend m0n0wall! http://www.m0n0.ch/wall It has web interface for everything, does NAT and a whole bunch of other goodies and can run P2P VPN with Checkpoint too! Andrew=20 -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Jim Freeze Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 11:31 To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Looking for SW Firewall Hi I am interested implementing a firewall in SW that has similar features as a Cisco PIX firewall. But, I don't want to roll my own ipfw statements. A nice gui would be nice. From the=20 ports index I see things like: dante-1.1.15 A circuit-level firewall/proxy cp2fwb-0.6 Checkpoint FW1 to Firewall Builder ruleset converter fwbuilder-2.0.10 Firewall Builder GUI and policy compilers hlfl-0.60.1 High Level Firewall Language libfwbuilder-2.0.10_1 Firewall Builder API pfw-0.6.2 A web frontend for the pf firewall I'm basically looking for a good firewall that has an easy administration interface. Can someone who has experience with this suggest a fw I should try? Thanks --=20 Jim Freeze _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" *************************************************************************= ************************* The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential. They are intended for the named recipient(s) only. If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager= or the=20 sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to anyone or make cop= ies. ** eSafe scanned this email for viruses, vandals and malicious content. *= * *************************************************************************= ************************* From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 17:59:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D910816A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:59:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from SP373@student.apu.ac.uk) Received: from mailhub-out.apu.ac.uk (mailhub-out.apu.ac.uk [193.63.55.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51D4343D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:59:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from SP373@student.apu.ac.uk) Received: from smtp.cam.apu.ac.uk ([193.63.55.9]:36604) by mailhub.anglia.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ex6jJ-0003ES-Mj for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:59:21 +0000 Received: from cam-netmail.netware.anglia.ac.uk ([194.83.45.141]:30787 helo=student.apu.ac.uk) by boswell.cam.apu.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ex6gB-00070S-Du for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:56:07 +0000 Received: from SP373 [172.212.93.178] by student.apu.ac.uk with NetMail ModWeb Module; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:55:56 +0000 From: "SPYRIDON PAPADOPOULOS" To: kalin@el.net Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:55:56 +0000 X-Mailer: NetMail ModWeb Module X-Sender: SP373 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <1137088556.8ba70d40SP373@student.apu.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ARU-HELO: smtp.cam.apu.ac.uk X-ARU-sender-host: smtp.cam.apu.ac.uk [193.63.55.9]:36604 X-ARU-MailScanner-Info: see http://www.apu.ac.uk/mail-problems X-ARU-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ARU-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-6.034, required 6, ARU_FROM_AC_UK -4.00, AWL 0.43, BAYES_00 -2.60, FORGED_RCVD_HELO 0.14) X-ARU-MailScanner-From: sp373@student.apu.ac.uk X-APU-MailFilter: message scanned X-ARU-MailFilter: message scanned Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: missing /dev/dsp X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: SP373@student.apu.ac.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:59:29 -0000 Hi, What pciconf -lv says? Can you find your card there? BIOS updates are known to make things better, but there are few chances to = cause such problems, in which case you can go back to a previous version. Before you think of that however, find and read what the new version they i= nstalled, is fixing. Be sure before start messing with the bios. -----Original Message----- From: "kalin mintchev" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 02:13:41 -0500 (EST) Subject: missing /dev/dsp hi all.. i sent my t30 to ibm to replace a not working ram slot and i got it back in less then 48 hrs. pretty good. except the /dev/dsp is missing. i don't see any cards in the dmesg but i know that the audio card is "SoundBlaster compatible". my system is 5.4 and according to the handbook devfs should figure it out - i haven't had to do this before... a have the audio enabled in the kernel... pcm... any ideas why is the dsp missing? i think they did bios upgrade - is that what screwed it up? thanks... -- _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 18:08:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6189816A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:08:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (dc.cis.okstate.edu [139.78.100.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3F4E43D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:08:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (localhost.cis.okstate.edu [127.0.0.1]) by dc.cis.okstate.edu (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k0CI8Bhn047179 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:08:11 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Message-Id: <200601121808.k0CI8Bhn047179@dc.cis.okstate.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:08:11 -0600 From: Martin McCormick Subject: Re: Strange Failure Mode in FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:08:12 -0000 I found the problem though I haven't found the cause. It turns out that the tcp/ip stack was working all along but ipfw is having trouble. When I list all the rules, I get all the rules I put in, but none of the rules that rc.firewall is supposed to install which are needed for open operation. That does completely disable even local icmp plus just about everything else. My thanks to Greg Barniskis who mentioned ipfw which turned out to be the culprit. Now, I will try to figure out why rc.firewall which is certainly right where it should be is being ignored. Thanks to all. Martin McCormick WB5AGZ Stillwater, OK OSU Information Technology Department Network Operations Group From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 18:09:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 051B416A422 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:09:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from deejy-pooh@ntlworld.com) Received: from mta08-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (mta08-winn.ispmail.ntl.com [81.103.221.48]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36ACA43D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:09:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from deejy-pooh@ntlworld.com) Received: from aamta11-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mta08-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20060112180939.NMTV21497.mta08-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamta11-winn.ispmail.ntl.com> for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:09:39 +0000 Received: from [82.25.112.91] by aamta11-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20060112180939.SBZA19063.aamta11-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@[82.25.112.91]> for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:09:39 +0000 Message-ID: <43C70BE1.6080406@ntlworld.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:09:37 -0800 From: Uncle Deejy-Pooh User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051005) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:09:44 -0000 Hey, I've spent the day using pc-bsd, and I quite like it ! Can I remain on the mailing list, or are people already forming hollow squares to drum me out ? Regards to all for the New Year, Deej From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 18:15:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FBB616A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:15:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from qing.li@bluecoat.com) Received: from whisker.bluecoat.com (whisker.bluecoat.com [216.52.23.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A92E43D80 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:15:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from qing.li@bluecoat.com) Received: from bcs-mail4.internal.cacheflow.com (bcs-mail4.internal.cacheflow.com [10.2.2.57]) by whisker.bluecoat.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k0CIEhGk018568 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:15:41 -0800 (PST) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:15:15 -0800 Message-ID: <326DB2F7011D9347B156DA019416F3F703AD6BC1@bcs-mail4.internal.cacheflow.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Sound on Dell D600 laptop Thread-Index: AcYXpCLeWFmk75oATiqn8FIZgVM4zg== From: "Li, Qing" To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.49 on 216.52.23.28 Subject: Sound on Dell D600 laptop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:15:59 -0000 Has anyone successfully gotten the sound to work on the Dell D600 laptop running FreeBSD 6.0? If you've done it, could you please share your tricks with me. Thanks, -- Qing From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 18:22:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C215B16A420 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:22:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from njt@ayvali.org) Received: from sanddollar.geekisp.com (sanddollar.geekisp.com [204.89.131.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F9943D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:22:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from njt@ayvali.org) Received: (qmail 20236 invoked by uid 1003); 12 Jan 2006 18:22:08 -0000 Received: from clam.int.geekisp.com (HELO clam.geekisp.com) (192.168.4.38) by mail.geekisp.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 12 Jan 2006 18:22:08 -0000 Received: from clam.geekisp.com (njt@localhost.geekisp.com [127.0.0.1]) by clam.geekisp.com (8.13.3/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k0CIM7aE024671; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:22:07 -0500 (EST) Received: (from njt@localhost) by clam.geekisp.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id k0CIM6no030530; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:22:06 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: clam.geekisp.com: njt set sender to njt@ayvali.org using -f Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:22:06 -0500 From: "N.J. Thomas" To: Brad Marsh Message-ID: <20060112182206.GB2451@ayvali.org> References: <20060112173337.53839.qmail@web31014.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060112173337.53839.qmail@web31014.mail.mud.yahoo.com> List-Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help with panic: vm_fault X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:22:09 -0000 * Brad Marsh [2006-01-12 09:33:37 -0800]: > I removed both of those and put in two 512MB sticks of Kingston PC2700 > RAM - and that's when I got the panic. [...] > So my comclusion is that FreeBSD is having trouble booting with 2 > 512MB RAM sticks. The BIOS recognizes the RAM ok Before you do anything else, I strongly recommend you put in both of the new memory modules in and run memtest86+. Thomas -- N.J. Thomas njt@ayvali.org Etiamsi occiderit me, in ipso sperabo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 18:24:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1D6116A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:24:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mcg@dnainternet.net) Received: from smtp.dnainternet.net (smtp.dnainternet.net [62.241.254.111]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4028743D46 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:24:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mcg@dnainternet.net) Received: from cm-062-241-217-153.lohjanpuhelin.fi ([62.241.217.153]:62475 "EHLO [192.168.0.105]" smtp-auth: TLS-CIPHER: "RC4-MD5 keybits 128/128 version TLSv1/SSLv3" TLS-PEER-CN1: ) by smtp2.dnainternet.net with ESMTPS id S1228687AbWALSX6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:23:58 +0200 From: mcg To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-UswC3WP9Ts+nyRJN29Lb" Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:08:06 +0200 Message-Id: <1137089286.1530.10.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Subject: mandatory access control X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:24:03 -0000 --=-UswC3WP9Ts+nyRJN29Lb Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable hi! i am trying to activate MAC in my box and i followed the handbook step by step but i have problem with the modules.after i configure that example user uid 1001 will login to insecure policy and and i marked YES those modules in loader.conf then after reboot i have kernel panic,system boots in 15 sec by itself saying that no dump device defined.by the way, when i try to usr Dr.Watson's policy.contexts with command setfsmac -ef /etc/policy.contexts / and /usr i get error saying that mac_set_link(/, biba/high,mls/high): Invalid argument.could you help me please? regards mcg --=-UswC3WP9Ts+nyRJN29Lb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDxpsGuGqAe0/G/JARAt4FAKDvtkqrsnWYB9+GJ3HRhMts28aL7gCgh4yr 2Eie02ew+9ttiL4fM6HWNAY= =B7nx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-UswC3WP9Ts+nyRJN29Lb-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 18:37:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B28816A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:37:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doug@polands.org) Received: from corinth.polands.org (CPE-72-129-222-120.new.res.rr.com [72.129.222.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B591F43D46 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:37:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doug@polands.org) Received: from email.polands.org (ammon.polands.org [172.16.1.7]) by corinth.polands.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0CIb8TH096920; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:37:09 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from doug@polands.org) Received: from 209.103.215.99 (proxying for 209.103.215.99) (SquirrelMail authenticated user djp) by email.polands.org with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:37:09 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <65236.209.103.215.99.1137091029.squirrel@email.polands.org> In-Reply-To: <326DB2F7011D9347B156DA019416F3F703AD6BC1@bcs-mail4.internal.cacheflow .com> References: <326DB2F7011D9347B156DA019416F3F703AD6BC1@bcs-mail4.internal.cacheflow.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:37:09 -0600 (CST) From: "Doug Poland" To: "Li, Qing" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87/1239/Thu Jan 12 05:36:22 2006 on corinth.polands.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sound on Dell D600 laptop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:37:14 -0000 On Thu, January 12, 2006 12:15, Li, Qing wrote: > > Has anyone successfully gotten the sound to work > on the Dell D600 laptop running FreeBSD 6.0? > > If you've done it, could you please share your tricks > with me. > I've got a C600 laptop working with sound. Not sure if it's the same, but I added the following line to my /boot/loader.conf snd_maestro3_load="YES" -- Regards, Doug From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 18:44:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9402316A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:44:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from SP373@student.apu.ac.uk) Received: from mailhub-out.apu.ac.uk (mailhub-out.apu.ac.uk [193.63.55.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9053643D6B for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:44:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from SP373@student.apu.ac.uk) Received: from smtp.cam.apu.ac.uk ([193.63.55.9]:37454) by mailhub.anglia.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ex7Qd-00071f-PK for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:44:08 +0000 Received: from cam-netmail.netware.anglia.ac.uk ([194.83.45.141]:31967 helo=student.apu.ac.uk) by boswell.cam.apu.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ex7QY-0007wK-J0 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:44:02 +0000 Received: from SP373 [172.212.93.178] by student.apu.ac.uk with NetMail ModWeb Module; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:43:51 +0000 From: "SPYRIDON PAPADOPOULOS" To: qing.li@bluecoat.com Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:43:51 +0000 X-Mailer: NetMail ModWeb Module X-Sender: SP373 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <1137091431.8ba70fa0SP373@student.apu.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ARU-HELO: smtp.cam.apu.ac.uk X-ARU-sender-host: smtp.cam.apu.ac.uk [193.63.55.9]:37454 X-ARU-MailScanner-Info: see http://www.apu.ac.uk/mail-problems X-ARU-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ARU-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-6.098, required 6, autolearn=not spam, ARU_FROM_AC_UK -4.00, AWL 0.37, BAYES_00 -2.60, FORGED_RCVD_HELO 0.14) X-ARU-MailScanner-From: sp373@student.apu.ac.uk X-APU-MailFilter: message scanned X-ARU-MailFilter: message scanned Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sound on Dell D600 laptop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: SP373@student.apu.ac.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:44:15 -0000 Hi, first do a=20 #pciconf -lv to find your card. I have a Latitude C810 and the card is a E= SS Maestro PCI Audio (I think you have the same..) on a FreeBSD 5.4. Rele= ase. If these instructions are different somehow in FreeBSD 6.0 i would l= ike to know it, please. Then check the /boot/defaults/loader.conf file for the apropriate sound dev= ice for your system. The one also found in the output of pciconf -lv. and add them in the /boot/loader.conf file which over writes what is in /bo= ot/defaults/loader.conf=20 I for example have the following two lines added: sound_load=3D"YES" snd_maestro3_load=3D"YES" restart the computer and try #cat /dev/sndstat ..make sure if you are using kde to start kMix. It happened to me before th= at the volume was turned down. Qing wrote: >-----Original Message----- >From: "Li, Qing" >To: >Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:15:15 -0800 >Subject: Sound on Dell D600 laptop >=09Has anyone successfully gotten the sound to >work >=09on the Dell D600 laptop running FreeBSD 6.0? > >=09If you've done it, could you please share >your tricks >=09with me. >=09Thanks, >=09-- Qing _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 18:46:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8E5416A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:46:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kiffin.gish@planet.nl) Received: from post-22.mail.nl.demon.net (post-22.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A7FF43D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:46:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kiffin.gish@planet.nl) Received: from gish.demon.nl ([83.160.27.223]:20396 helo=[192.168.1.33]) by post-22.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1Ex7Sb-0001qQ-RF; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:46:10 +0000 From: Kiffin Gish To: Doug Poland In-Reply-To: <65236.209.103.215.99.1137091029.squirrel@email.polands.org> References: <326DB2F7011D9347B156DA019416F3F703AD6BC1@bcs-mail4.internal.cacheflow.com> <65236.209.103.215.99.1137091029.squirrel@email.polands.org> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:46:09 +0100 Message-Id: <1137091569.821.11.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Li, Qing" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sound on Dell D600 laptop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:46:11 -0000 On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 12:37 -0600, Doug Poland wrote: > On Thu, January 12, 2006 12:15, Li, Qing wrote: > > > > Has anyone successfully gotten the sound to work > > on the Dell D600 laptop running FreeBSD 6.0? > > > > If you've done it, could you please share your tricks > > with me. > > > I've got a C600 laptop working with sound. Not sure if it's the same, > but I added the following line to my /boot/loader.conf > > snd_maestro3_load="YES" > > Don't forget: sound_load="YES" # Digital sound subsystem -- Kiffin Gish From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 18:47:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82CE616A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:47:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from agerber@ncsu.edu) Received: from uni08mr.unity.ncsu.edu (uni08mr.unity.ncsu.edu [152.1.1.171]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04DB043D49 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:47:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from agerber@ncsu.edu) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (beetaster.unity.ncsu.edu [152.1.10.8]) by uni08mr.unity.ncsu.edu (8.13.4/8.13.4/N.20050816.01) with ESMTP id k0CIktx8009993; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:47:01 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43C6A423.3070805@ncsu.edu> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:46:59 -0500 From: Alan Gerber User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Poland References: <326DB2F7011D9347B156DA019416F3F703AD6BC1@bcs-mail4.internal.cacheflow.com> <65236.209.103.215.99.1137091029.squirrel@email.polands.org> In-Reply-To: <65236.209.103.215.99.1137091029.squirrel@email.polands.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-PMX-Version: 4.7.1.128075, Antispam-Engine: 2.1.0.0, Antispam-Data: 2006.01.12.101104 X-Spam-Status: No, Hits=7% X-Spam-Level: IIIIIII Cc: "Li, Qing" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sound on Dell D600 laptop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:47:12 -0000 Sound works beautifully on my D600. Unfortunately, I don't have it in front of me at work. But from what I remember, all you need to do is load the snd_ich driver via kldload(8). Alternatively as Doug mentioned, you can place the line into /boot/loader.conf to make the system load the driver at startup. The proper driver as I recall is snd_ich, so you'll need to use the line: snd_ich_load="YES" -- Alan Gerber Doug Poland wrote: > On Thu, January 12, 2006 12:15, Li, Qing wrote: > >> Has anyone successfully gotten the sound to work >> on the Dell D600 laptop running FreeBSD 6.0? >> >> If you've done it, could you please share your tricks >> with me. >> > > I've got a C600 laptop working with sound. Not sure if it's the same, > but I added the following line to my /boot/loader.conf > > snd_maestro3_load="YES" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 18:48:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B76816A420 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:48:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7666F43D95 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:48:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Ex7UI-0003T9-7R for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:47:54 +0100 Received: from h-68-164-219-99.cmbrmaor.covad.net ([68.164.219.99]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:47:54 +0100 Received: from mainland by h-68-164-219-99.cmbrmaor.covad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:47:54 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Geoffrey Mainland Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:47:42 -0500 Lines: 19 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: h-68-164-219-99.cmbrmaor.covad.net User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051220) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en Sender: news Subject: Hard crashes after installation of Intel(R) PRO/1000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:48:19 -0000 Hi, I'm currently running a gateway box with three NICs, an Intel 82558 Pro/100 Ethernet (fxp), Intel 82559 Pro/100 Ethernet (fxp), and a newly installed Intel(R) PRO/1000 (reported as Intel(R) PRO/1000 Network Connection Version - 3.2.18, uses the em driver). After installing the pro/1000, the machine periodically crashes hard. Sometimes it stays up for a few hours, and sometimes for a day, but never for more than two days. This box is a gateway connected to a wifi network, a cable modem and a switch, runs various daemons, serves NFS etc. It's running a recent build of 6.0-STABLE (built 1/11) with the BSD scheduler and PREEMPTION on and FAST_IPSEC. When it crashes it sometimes reboots, but usually it just completely locks up. I have been unable to get a crash dump. Has anyone had similar problems? It seems to be related to the em device, as this didn't happen before. Thanks, Geoff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 18:50:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D562B16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:50:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: from mail.el.net (mail.el.net [68.165.89.91]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0BF343D60 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:50:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: (qmail 28428 invoked by uid 1008); 12 Jan 2006 18:51:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.el.net) (127.0.0.1) by mail.el.net with SMTP; 12 Jan 2006 18:51:03 -0000 Received: from 24.90.33.115 (SquirrelMail authenticated user kalin@el.net) by mail.el.net with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:51:03 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <50047.24.90.33.115.1137091863.squirrel@mail.el.net> In-Reply-To: <1137088556.8ba70d40SP373@student.apu.ac.uk> References: <1137088556.8ba70d40SP373@student.apu.ac.uk> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:51:03 -0500 (EST) From: "kalin mintchev" To: SP373@student.apu.ac.uk User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: missing /dev/dsp X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:50:09 -0000 > Hi, > > What pciconf -lv says? Can you find your card there? not there. everything else seems to be fine but the sound card is not there. > BIOS updates are known to make things better, but there are few chances to > cause such problems, in which case you can go back to a previous version. > Before you think of that however, find and read what the new version they > installed, is fixing. Be sure before start messing with the bios. right... but how to be sure that are the bios and they didn't screwed the card itself when they where replacing the board where the ram slots are?! > > > -----Original Message----- > From: "kalin mintchev" > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 02:13:41 -0500 (EST) > Subject: missing /dev/dsp > > > > hi all.. > > i sent my t30 to ibm to replace a not working ram slot and i got it back > in less then 48 hrs. pretty good. except the /dev/dsp is missing. > > i don't see any cards in the dmesg but i know that the audio card is > "SoundBlaster compatible". my system is 5.4 and according to the handbook > devfs should figure it out - i haven't had to do this before... > a have the audio enabled in the kernel... pcm... > > any ideas why is the dsp missing? i think they did bios upgrade - is that > what screwed it up? > > thanks... > > -- > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 18:53:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E8CE16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:53:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta11.adelphia.net (mta11.adelphia.net [68.168.78.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD9DB43D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:53:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([24.50.210.221]) by mta11.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060112185344.POFY5278.mta11.adelphia.net@barbish>; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:53:44 -0500 From: "fbsd_user" To: "cedric Gross" , Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:53:39 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <20060112155251.9D0CF6F19C@bruce.cnv.fr> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: IpNat and 3 NIC X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:53:46 -0000 answer is that is the syntax of the ipnat rules. read the handbook its all there. vr0 is the interface faceing the public internet just like syntax requires -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of cedric Gross Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 10:54 AM To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: IpNat and 3 NIC Thanks you, it's working ! But why using vr0 instead of vr1 for map instruction ? Network 192.168.0.32/27 is attach to vr1 not vr0 ... Is it an IPNat mystery or have you an answer ? > -----Message d'origine----- > De : owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] De la part de fbsd_user > Envoyé : jeudi 12 janvier 2006 16:43 > À : cedric Gross; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Objet : RE: IpNat and 3 NIC > > You have ipnat statements wrong. should be liked this > > map vr0 10.0.0.0/8 -> 0.32 proxy port ftp ftp/tcp > map vr0 10.0.0.0/8 -> 0.32 portmap tcp/udp 20000:60000 > map vr0 10.0.0.0/8 -> 0.32 > map vr0 192.168.0.0/30 -> 0.32 portmap tcp/udp auto > map vr0 192.168.0.32/27 -> 0.32 portmap tcp/udp auto > map vr0 192.168.0.32/27 -> 0.32 > map vr0 192.168.0.96/27 -> 0.32 portmap tcp/udp auto > map vr0 192.168.0.96/27 -> 0.32 > rdr xl0 0.0.0.0/0 port 80 -> 10.0.0.254 port 3128 tcp > rdr vr1 192.168.0.32/27 port 80 -> 10.0.0.254 port 3128 tcp > rdr vr1 192.168.0.96/27 port 80 -> 10.0.0.254 port 3128 tcp > > Note map vr1 has been changed to vr0 > > If your public IP 84.96.23.106 is not dedicated to you by your ISP, > then you should not be hard coding it in your IPnat rules. Read the > Freebsd ipfilter documentation in the handbook for details. > > 0.32 = The IP address/netmask assigned by your ISP. > The special keyword 0.32 tells ipnat to get the current > public > IP address of the interface specified on this statement and > substitute it for the 0.32 keyword. > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of cedric > Gross > Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 9:58 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: IpNat and 3 NIC > > > Hello, > > I have my FreeBSD 5.4 box with 3 NIC : > > Xl0 LAN with network 10.0.0.0/8 and 192.168.0.0/30 > VR0 Wan 84.96.23.106/32 > VR1 LAN with network 192.168.0.32/27 and 192.168.0.96/27 > > I use IPNAT and Ip filter. > > I'm doing NAT from Xl0 to Vr0, it's working fine > > I'm trying to do the same thing with vr1 to Vr0 but it's seems that > traffic > coming from vr1 are not translated. > Is there a interface limitation with IPNAT ? > > Is there a way to do translation from both NIC ? > > Here is my ipnat.conf : > map vr0 10.0.0.0/8 -> 84.96.23.106/32 proxy port ftp ftp/tcp > map vr0 10.0.0.0/8 -> 84.96.23.106/32 portmap tcp/udp 20000:60000 > map vr0 10.0.0.0/8 -> 84.96.23.106/32 > map vr0 192.168.0.0/30 -> 84.96.23.106/32 portmap tcp/udp auto > map vr1 192.168.0.32/27 -> 84.96.23.106/32 portmap tcp/udp auto > map vr1 192.168.0.32/27 -> 84.96.23.106/32 > map vr1 192.168.0.96/27 -> 84.96.23.106/32 portmap tcp/udp auto > map vr1 192.168.0.96/27 -> 84.96.23.106/32 > rdr xl0 0.0.0.0/0 port 80 -> 10.0.0.254 port 3128 tcp > rdr vr1 192.168.0.32/27 port 80 -> 10.0.0.254 port 3128 tcp > rdr vr1 192.168.0.96/27 port 80 -> 10.0.0.254 port 3128 tcp > > Thanks for help. > Cedric > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 18:56:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9F9616A422 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:56:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from qing.li@bluecoat.com) Received: from whisker.bluecoat.com (whisker.bluecoat.com [216.52.23.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAF1F43D48 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:55:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from qing.li@bluecoat.com) Received: from bcs-mail4.internal.cacheflow.com (bcs-mail4.internal.cacheflow.com [10.2.2.57]) by whisker.bluecoat.com (8.13.0/8.13.0) with ESMTP id k0CItjCD020819; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:55:47 -0800 (PST) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:55:42 -0800 Message-ID: <326DB2F7011D9347B156DA019416F3F703AD6CDB@bcs-mail4.internal.cacheflow.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Sound on Dell D600 laptop Thread-Index: AcYXqJlVHCyMbvetT0iHap6udWaHSQAAJXYw From: "Li, Qing" To: "Alan Gerber" , "Doug Poland" X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.49 on 216.52.23.28 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Sound on Dell D600 laptop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:56:08 -0000 Thanks all.=20 >=20 > snd_ich_load=3D"YES" >=20 I don't have the above, wasn't quite sure which one to load because it's a SigmaTel, though=20 /usr/src/sys/dev/sound/pcm/ac97.c appears to include it. I'll give it a try. Thanks again. -- Qing From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 18:57:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6393416A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:57:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doug@polands.org) Received: from corinth.polands.org (CPE-72-129-222-120.new.res.rr.com [72.129.222.120]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D417E43D46 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:57:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from doug@polands.org) Received: from email.polands.org (ammon.polands.org [172.16.1.7]) by corinth.polands.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0CIvmB4097012; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:57:48 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from doug@polands.org) Received: from 209.103.215.99 (proxying for 209.103.215.99) (SquirrelMail authenticated user djp) by email.polands.org with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:57:49 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <57569.209.103.215.99.1137092269.squirrel@email.polands.org> In-Reply-To: <1137091569.821.11.camel@localhost> References: <326DB2F7011D9347B156DA019416F3F703AD6BC1@bcs-mail4.internal.cacheflow.com> <65236.209.103.215.99.1137091029.squirrel@email.polands.org> <1137091569.821.11.camel@localhost> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:57:49 -0600 (CST) From: "Doug Poland" To: "Kiffin Gish" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87/1239/Thu Jan 12 05:36:22 2006 on corinth.polands.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Doug Poland , "Li, Qing" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sound on Dell D600 laptop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:57:52 -0000 On Thu, January 12, 2006 12:46, Kiffin Gish wrote: > On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 12:37 -0600, Doug Poland wrote: >> On Thu, January 12, 2006 12:15, Li, Qing wrote: >>> >>> Has anyone successfully gotten the sound to work on the Dell D600 >>> laptop running FreeBSD 6.0? >>> >>> If you've done it, could you please share your tricks with me. >>> >> I've got a C600 laptop working with sound. Not sure if it's the >> same, but I added the following line to my /boot/loader.conf >> >> snd_maestro3_load="YES" >> >> > > Don't forget: > > sound_load="YES" # Digital sound subsystem > Curious? Why is sound_load="YES" necessary? -- Regards, Doug From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 19:03:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 097B016A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:03:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta13.adelphia.net (mta13.adelphia.net [68.168.78.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29DD243D46 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:03:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([24.50.210.221]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060112190323.JKDE26442.mta13.adelphia.net@barbish> for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:03:23 -0500 From: "fbsd_user" To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD. ORG" Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:03:22 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: have bad fstab causing boot error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:03:25 -0000 fstab is bad and boot drops me into "manual root filesystems spec" I answer ufs:ad0s1a and get these messages "warning / was not properly dismounted" "warning R/W of / denied. filesystem is not clean run fcsk" when I enter fsck command nothing happens. What is procedure to follow here??? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 19:03:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDA8916A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:03:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C7B043D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:03:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2) with ESMTP id k0CJ3XiU023436; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:03:33 -0500 (EST) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2/Submit) id k0CJ3Xf3023435; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:03:33 -0500 (EST) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200601121903.k0CJ3Xf3023435@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: deejy-pooh@ntlworld.com (Uncle Deejy-Pooh) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:03:33 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <43C70BE1.6080406@ntlworld.com> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL7] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:03:34 -0000 > > Hey, I've spent the day using pc-bsd, and I quite like it ! Can I remain > on the > mailing list, or are people already forming hollow squares to drum me out ? What qualified you to be on the list in the first place? The same thing qualifies you to stay on the list. But, I suppose you were just joking. ////jerry > > Regards to all for the New Year, > Deej > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 19:09:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65DB116A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:09:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from budojeepr@yahoo.com) Received: from web31013.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web31013.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.201.71]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DC20343D5A for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:09:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from budojeepr@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 86189 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Jan 2006 19:09:30 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=t6hXyYmNnk+5mkazH7iKUsM6mIdEr0rD9Euwno201+LABf6/vaJO+2lYdQzzaX/i9eLp/ich0Q3c32M0wQbvLSU2uaCcIl9wN4H/p7F0yVYkf3nEn5n7tVl7hMTxe5pjSyYqW6jq2iukYk0OCMMUlWAftcigAmQcOrhU+zgeW1E= ; Message-ID: <20060112190930.86187.qmail@web31013.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [209.76.69.106] by web31013.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:09:29 PST Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:09:29 -0800 (PST) From: Brad Marsh To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20060112182206.GB2451@ayvali.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Help with panic: vm_fault X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:09:33 -0000 OK...in agreement, I've read that memory modules will sometimes work in pairs, not individually, or singly, not in pairs... Thanks! P.S. "Juraj", you're right. I'm sure FreeBSD can handle more than 1GB RAM - it's just my system. I was hoping someone could look at the debug info and say something helpful like "it's for sure your memory module hardware!". :^) --- "N.J. Thomas" wrote: > > So my comclusion is that FreeBSD is having trouble booting with 2 > > 512MB RAM sticks. The BIOS recognizes the RAM ok > > Before you do anything else, I strongly recommend you put in both of > the new memory modules in and run memtest86+. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 19:16:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48D8A16A426 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:16:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from SP373@student.apu.ac.uk) Received: from mailhub-out.apu.ac.uk (mailhub-out.apu.ac.uk [193.63.55.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C2FD43D48 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:16:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from SP373@student.apu.ac.uk) Received: from smtp.cam.apu.ac.uk ([193.63.55.9]:38619) by mailhub.anglia.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ex7vq-0000Yz-M0 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:16:22 +0000 Received: from cam-netmail.netware.anglia.ac.uk ([194.83.45.141]:32752 helo=student.apu.ac.uk) by boswell.cam.apu.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ex7vl-0008UW-Eo for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:16:17 +0000 Received: from SP373 [172.212.93.178] by student.apu.ac.uk with NetMail ModWeb Module; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:16:06 +0000 From: "SPYRIDON PAPADOPOULOS" To: kalin@el.net Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:16:06 +0000 X-Mailer: NetMail ModWeb Module X-Sender: SP373 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <1137093366.8ba70fa0SP373@student.apu.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ARU-HELO: smtp.cam.apu.ac.uk X-ARU-sender-host: smtp.cam.apu.ac.uk [193.63.55.9]:38619 X-ARU-MailScanner-Info: see http://www.apu.ac.uk/mail-problems X-ARU-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ARU-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-6.159, required 6, autolearn=not spam, ARU_FROM_AC_UK -4.00, AWL 0.30, BAYES_00 -2.60, FORGED_RCVD_HELO 0.14) X-ARU-MailScanner-From: sp373@student.apu.ac.uk X-APU-MailFilter: message scanned X-ARU-MailFilter: message scanned Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re: missing /dev/dsp X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: SP373@student.apu.ac.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:16:27 -0000 Hi again, -----Original Message----- From: "kalin mintchev" To: SP373@student.apu.ac.uk Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:51:03 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: missing /dev/dsp > Hi, > > What pciconf -lv says? Can you find your card there? > not there. everything else seems to be fine but the >sound card is not th= ere. Well if it is not there then you must call them back and report this, since= also you cannot see the card in dmesg... > BIOS updates are known to make things better, but there are few chances t= o > cause such problems, in which case you can go back to a previous version. > Before you think of that however, find and read what the new version they > installed, is fixing. Be sure before start messing with the bios. > right... but how to be sure that are the bios and >they didn't screwed th= e >card itself when they where replacing the board >where the ram slots are?! ..Of course there are chances that things can go wrong, as you are mentioni= ng above.It looks h/w problem or compatibility issue maybe, so call them = back and report your problem.=20 However you took the machine back in 48 hours probably because: they unscrew one screw and changed your memory (not replacing the board..) = and memory slots are not close to the sound card (are exatly under your l= eft hand.(one screw) as i can see, then they updated the BIOS, then run s= ome tests which passed, finally dispatched your laptop. Please don't try to open your laptop, i have a T30 here out of warranty. Ju= st call them back, they will not charge you probably. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: "kalin mintchev" > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 02:13:41 -0500 (EST) > Subject: missing /dev/dsp > > > > hi all.. > > i sent my t30 to ibm to replace a not working ram slot and i got it back > in less then 48 hrs. pretty good. except the /dev/dsp is missing. > > i don't see any cards in the dmesg but i know that the audio card is > "SoundBlaster compatible". my system is 5.4 and according to the handbook > devfs should figure it out - i haven't had to do this before... > a have the audio enabled in the kernel... pcm... > > any ideas why is the dsp missing? i think they did bios upgrade - is tha= t > what screwed it up? > > thanks... > > -- > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > -- _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 19:20:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FB6516A420 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:20:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jdunham@texas.net) Received: from mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.8]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CAF043D62 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:20:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jdunham@texas.net) Received: (qmail 17213 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2006 19:20:38 -0000 Received: from dsl093-216-153.aus1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO [192.168.0.101]) (ldunham@[66.93.216.153]) (envelope-sender ) by mail6.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 12 Jan 2006 19:20:38 -0000 From: "Jerry Dunham" To: "Doug Poland" Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:20:18 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <43C65792.8667.46CE701@jdunham.texas.net> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <65236.209.103.215.99.1137091029.squirrel@email.polands.org> References: <326DB2F7011D9347B156DA019416F3F703AD6BC1@bcs-mail4.internal.cacheflow .com> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.30 public beta 1) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Sound on Dell D600 laptop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:20:51 -0000 On 12 Jan 2006 at 12:37, Doug Poland wrote: > On Thu, January 12, 2006 12:15, Li, Qing wrote: > > > > Has anyone successfully gotten the sound to work > > on the Dell D600 laptop running FreeBSD 6.0? > > > > If you've done it, could you please share your tricks > > with me. > > > I've got a C600 laptop working with sound. Not sure if it's the same, > but I added the following line to my /boot/loader.conf > > snd_maestro3_load="YES" The C600 and D600 are quite different critters. That doesn't guarantee that your suggestion WON'T work, but it wouldn't be surprising if it failed. I don't recall what sound architecture the D600 uses, but it was a complete redesign following the last of the C-series. If you need more information on the D-series I can probably find out. -- Jerry Dunham jdunham@texas.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 19:31:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4206516A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:31:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from njt@ayvali.org) Received: from sanddollar.geekisp.com (sanddollar.geekisp.com [204.89.131.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 816B443D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:31:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from njt@ayvali.org) Received: (qmail 31586 invoked by uid 1003); 12 Jan 2006 19:31:41 -0000 Received: from clam.int.geekisp.com (HELO clam.geekisp.com) (192.168.4.38) by mail.geekisp.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 12 Jan 2006 19:31:41 -0000 Received: from clam.geekisp.com (njt@localhost.geekisp.com [127.0.0.1]) by clam.geekisp.com (8.13.3/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k0CJVfm0007774; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:31:41 -0500 (EST) Received: (from njt@localhost) by clam.geekisp.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id k0CJVerK009322; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:31:40 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: clam.geekisp.com: njt set sender to njt@ayvali.org using -f Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:31:40 -0500 From: "N.J. Thomas" To: Brad Marsh Message-ID: <20060112193140.GE2451@ayvali.org> References: <20060112182206.GB2451@ayvali.org> <20060112190930.86187.qmail@web31013.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060112190930.86187.qmail@web31013.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mail-Folloup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help with panic: vm_fault X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:31:43 -0000 * Brad Marsh [2006-01-12 11:09:29 -0800]: > OK...in agreement, I've read that memory modules will sometimes work > in pairs, not individually Older memory/systems used to only take memory that worked in pairs, newer ones shouldn't have that problem. In the worst case, it may accept a single module, but maybe not run as fast as it would with a pair. But my memory-fu isn't up to date, and perhaps someone could correct me. > or singly, not in pairs... This should never be the case. If your memory is acceptable one module at a time, why wouldn't the system accept two? Thomas -- N.J. Thomas njt@ayvali.org Etiamsi occiderit me, in ipso sperabo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 19:35:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B00D816A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:35:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from SP373@student.apu.ac.uk) Received: from mailhub-out.apu.ac.uk (mailhub-out.apu.ac.uk [193.63.55.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 305A143D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:35:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from SP373@student.apu.ac.uk) Received: from smtp.cam.apu.ac.uk ([193.63.55.9]:38887) by mailhub.anglia.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ex8Ef-0001s2-3G for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:35:49 +0000 Received: from cam-netmail.netware.anglia.ac.uk ([194.83.45.141]:33375 helo=student.apu.ac.uk) by boswell.cam.apu.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ex8EZ-0000MM-Qn for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:35:43 +0000 Received: from SP373 [172.212.93.178] by student.apu.ac.uk with NetMail ModWeb Module; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:35:38 +0000 From: "SPYRIDON PAPADOPOULOS" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:35:38 +0000 X-Mailer: NetMail ModWeb Module X-Sender: SP373 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <1137094538.8ba70fa0SP373@student.apu.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ARU-HELO: smtp.cam.apu.ac.uk X-ARU-sender-host: smtp.cam.apu.ac.uk [193.63.55.9]:38887 X-ARU-MailScanner-Info: see http://www.apu.ac.uk/mail-problems X-ARU-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ARU-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-6.203, required 6, autolearn=not spam, ARU_FROM_AC_UK -4.00, AWL 0.26, BAYES_00 -2.60, FORGED_RCVD_HELO 0.14) X-ARU-MailScanner-From: sp373@student.apu.ac.uk X-APU-MailFilter: message scanned X-ARU-MailFilter: message scanned Subject: How to create a manual page in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: SP373@student.apu.ac.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:35:53 -0000 Hi all, Can anyone describe/give info, of how one can create a manual page for a cu= stom program in FreeBSD. A manual page that would be accessible through t= he #man command. Is it possible? Thank you in advance S.P. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 19:37:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 272ED16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:37:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jfalconer@puc.edu) Received: from ecf.puc.edu (ecf2.puc.edu [12.16.216.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A68F643D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:37:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jfalconer@puc.edu) Received: from localhost (jfalconer@localhost) by ecf.puc.edu (8.11.6/8.10.1) with ESMTP id k0CJbpw27889; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:37:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:37:50 -0800 (PST) From: Jon Falconer To: questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <43C67D70.2010004@talon.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: warren schreiner Subject: Re: HP NetRAID 1Si trouble [SOLVED] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:37:53 -0000 On Thu, 12 Jan 2006, warren schreiner wrote: > Jon Falconer wrote: > > >Hi Everyone, > > > >I'm trying to recycle an old HP NetServer LC2000r P3/733 with 256MB RAM. > >It's been running MS Win2K for several years with no problems, but has > >become too slow for that task. I need to setup an email server for > >faculty/staff/students to do authenticated sending of email, seemed a > >perfect fit. So I started installing FreeBSD 6.0-Release like I've done > >many times before. After committing the changes, newfs claims to have > >succeeded for all partitions. But while extracting the install files it > >does not make the usual progress and fails with "Write failure on > >transfer! (wrote -1 bytes of 1425408 bytes)". Pressing alt-F2 shows the > >following messages: > > > >/stand/cpio: invalid header: checksum error > >/stand/cpio: warning: skipped 1024 bytes of junk > >/stand:cpio: :No such file or directory > > > > ... ... > > > >/stand/gunzip: : invalid stored block lengths > >/stand/cpio: premature end of file > > > >I've installed 6.0-Release on several other computers with this same CD so > >I think the CD is good. The system is booting ok from the CD so I would > >think that the CD drive is ok. > > > >I've updated the firmware on the 1Si card from F.02.05 to F.02.09, the > >latest I could find on HP's web site. I tried to install FBSD 5.4-Release > >with the same results. I ran a memory test, and it made three passes of > >eleven different test with no problems found. I installed 5.4-Release on > >an HP lp1000r with a NetRAID controller several months ago and it is > >working fine. > > > >I've run out of ideas of what to try next. Does anyone else have any > >suggestions? > > > >Thanks for your time, > > > >Jon > > > >_______________________________________________ > >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > > > > > > John: > > I run both lpr's and llp2000r's had the same problem I think it is the > cd drive. for some reason the drive just does not read some cd's. I've > replaced the origional drive with an hp DVD and works like a champ. The > DVD also can be used for backup. > > warren schreiner > delta healthcare partners llc > Warren, You are absolutely right. I had begun to suspect that last night, even scrounged up another CD drive. But it was late and I had to get home. This morning I had forgetten about that until I read your note. Swapped in a different CD drive and the install completed normally. Thanks! Jon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 19:40:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 585FC16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:40:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maksim.yevmenkin@gmail.com) Received: from uproxy.gmail.com (uproxy.gmail.com [66.249.92.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6EC243D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:40:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maksim.yevmenkin@gmail.com) Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id o2so182851uge for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:40:53 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=edk6nlhRbn9j4SvF5qF6J67Nxdt9o4qrEEhugNFH84v5F3nbmtzim7oRitRWKwy7DNAYllInHxd7F2fG/Oq/Vj/3H0iw3etftYTYJSJMbqm8Oyhph/bIre9EYotwfEFDX67Nn9VFkH9IJdZmNIVK8hbqfhQotNsb4MN5oUWMjRM= Received: by 10.49.17.20 with SMTP id u20mr9273nfi; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:40:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.4.9 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:40:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:40:20 -0800 From: Maksim Yevmenkin To: Core Dumped In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kbdmux: unable to work with dual keyboard X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:40:55 -0000 Hello, > 3. shell script (from man kbdcontrol): > > kbdcontrol -K < /dev/console > kbdcontrol -a /dev/ukbd0 < /dev/kbdmux0 > kbdcontrol -a /dev/atkbd0 < /dev/kbdmux0 > kbdcontrol -k /dev/kbdmux0 < /dev/console please read the man page carefully. you should use kbdcontrol -a ukbd0 < /dev/kbdmux0 kbdcontrol -a atkbd0 < /dev/kbdmux0 thanks, max From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 19:50:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0B1F16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:50:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout2.cac.washington.edu (mxout2.cac.washington.edu [140.142.33.4]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43A5743D46 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:50:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout2.cac.washington.edu (8.13.5+UW05.10/8.13.5+UW05.09) with ESMTP id k0CJoh9U007844 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:50:43 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [128.208.4.29] (shiina.dyn.cs.washington.edu [128.208.4.29]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.5+UW05.10/8.13.5+UW05.09) with ESMTP id k0CJoer7020025 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:50:43 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) In-Reply-To: <43C65792.8667.46CE701@jdunham.texas.net> References: <326DB2F7011D9347B156DA019416F3F703AD6BC1@bcs-mail4.internal.cacheflow .com> <43C65792.8667.46CE701@jdunham.texas.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <075C2301-47FB-4ABC-9B4E-98E42EBFBBF4@u.washington.edu> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Garrett Cooper Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:51:37 -0800 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' Subject: Re: Sound on Dell D600 laptop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:50:44 -0000 On Jan 12, 2006, at 11:20 AM, Jerry Dunham wrote: > On 12 Jan 2006 at 12:37, Doug Poland wrote: > >> On Thu, January 12, 2006 12:15, Li, Qing wrote: >>> >>> Has anyone successfully gotten the sound to work >>> on the Dell D600 laptop running FreeBSD 6.0? >>> >>> If you've done it, could you please share your tricks >>> with me. >>> >> I've got a C600 laptop working with sound. Not sure if it's the >> same, >> but I added the following line to my /boot/loader.conf >> >> snd_maestro3_load="YES" > > The C600 and D600 are quite different critters. That doesn't > guarantee > that your suggestion WON'T work, but it wouldn't be surprising if it > failed. I don't recall what sound architecture the D600 uses, but > it was > a complete redesign following the last of the C-series. If you > need more > information on the D-series I can probably find out. > > > -- > Jerry Dunham > jdunham@texas.net We have a series of D600's at my work, and in Windows they report that they use SigmaTel C-Major audio. Not sure what that maps to in FreeBSD. Look online in either the handbook or at Alsa's site for some more information. At least this is a working start for you. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 19:55:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDEDB16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:55:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout5.cac.washington.edu (mxout5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8532443D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:55:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.32.139]) by mxout5.cac.washington.edu (8.13.5+UW05.10/8.13.5+UW05.09) with ESMTP id k0CJtGOl022735 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:55:17 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [128.208.4.29] (shiina.dyn.cs.washington.edu [128.208.4.29]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.5+UW05.10/8.13.5+UW05.09) with ESMTP id k0CJtGw7021418 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:55:16 -0800 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) In-Reply-To: <1137093366.8ba70fa0SP373@student.apu.ac.uk> References: <1137093366.8ba70fa0SP373@student.apu.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <156E94F0-4F4A-45CB-8171-3A54EEA776F1@u.washington.edu> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Garrett Cooper Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:56:13 -0800 To: FreeBSD Questions X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' Subject: Re: missing /dev/dsp X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:55:18 -0000 On Jan 12, 2006, at 11:16 AM, SPYRIDON PAPADOPOULOS wrote: > Hi again, > > -----Original Message----- > From: "kalin mintchev" > To: SP373@student.apu.ac.uk > Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:51:03 -0500 (EST) > Subject: Re: missing /dev/dsp > > >> Hi, >> >> What pciconf -lv says? Can you find your card there? >> not there. everything else seems to be fine but the >sound card is >> not there. > > Well if it is not there then you must call them back and report > this, since also you cannot see the card in dmesg... > >> BIOS updates are known to make things better, but there are few >> chances to >> cause such problems, in which case you can go back to a previous >> version. >> Before you think of that however, find and read what the new >> version they >> installed, is fixing. Be sure before start messing with the bios. > >> right... but how to be sure that are the bios and >they didn't >> screwed the >> card itself when they where replacing the board >where the ram >> slots are?! > > ..Of course there are chances that things can go wrong, as you are > mentioning above.It looks h/w problem or compatibility issue maybe, > so call them back and report your problem. > However you took the machine back in 48 hours probably because: > they unscrew one screw and changed your memory (not replacing the > board..) and memory slots are not close to the sound card (are > exatly under your left hand.(one screw) as i can see, then they > updated the BIOS, then run some tests which passed, finally > dispatched your laptop. > Please don't try to open your laptop, i have a T30 here out of > warranty. Just call them back, they will not charge you probably. > >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: "kalin mintchev" >> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 02:13:41 -0500 (EST) >> Subject: missing /dev/dsp >> >> >> >> hi all.. >> >> i sent my t30 to ibm to replace a not working ram slot and i got >> it back >> in less then 48 hrs. pretty good. except the /dev/dsp is missing. >> >> i don't see any cards in the dmesg but i know that the audio card is >> "SoundBlaster compatible". my system is 5.4 and according to the >> handbook >> devfs should figure it out - i haven't had to do this before... >> a have the audio enabled in the kernel... pcm... >> >> any ideas why is the dsp missing? i think they did bios upgrade - >> is that >> what screwed it up? >> >> thanks... >> >> -- IBM's good about warranties and replacing parts as long as you are under warranty still. Believe me, after taking 2 IBM thinkpads apart, you don't even want to try and do the same thing I had to do. Be prepared to have a web browser handy for getting schematics off the website, because when they are going to diagnose your machine over the phone, they will ask you to do some pretty interesting procedures most likely. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 19:58:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C87116A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:58:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (dc.cis.okstate.edu [139.78.100.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E022E43D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:58:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (localhost.cis.okstate.edu [127.0.0.1]) by dc.cis.okstate.edu (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k0CJw9hn091722 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:58:09 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Message-Id: <200601121958.k0CJw9hn091722@dc.cis.okstate.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:58:09 -0600 From: Martin McCormick Subject: Re: Strange Failure Mode in FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:58:10 -0000 I now realize that what actually happened here is an incorrect setup on my part of ipfw. I actually had a similar problem on another system last Summer, thought I had figured it all out, and have a time bomb waiting if that system happens to reboot since it is set up the same way.:-) In the rc.conf.local, I have: firewall_enable="YES" # Set to YES to enable firewall functionality firewall_script="/etc/rc.firewall" firewall_type="OPEN" # Firewall type (see /etc/rc.firewall) firewall_quiet="NO" # Set to YES to suppress rule display firewall_logging="YES" # Set to YES to enable events logging firewall_flags="" # Flags passed to ipfw when type is a file That makes ipfw load the rules in rc.firewall just fine. In rc.firewall, there is a place where one can include a table of local rules and that's where I am doing something wrong. The place in rc.firewall reads: # filename - will load the rules in the given filename (full path required) So, I have tried various forms of filename /etc/firewall_rules.ns and even filename - /etc/firewall_rules.ns ipfw nicely loads the rules in rc.firewall and then complains about filename not found. I even just stuck the path and file name in a line under # filename - will load the rules in the given filename (full path required) I wasn't surprised when it didn't like that either. If I replace rc.firewall with firewall_rules.ns, then only those rules get added which is why the tcp/ip stack appeared dead. What do I need to put in /etc/rc.firewall so it just includes /etc/firewall_rules.ns like the #include directive usually does? Many thanks. Martin McCormick WB5AGZ Stillwater, OK OSU Information Technology Department Network Operations Group .-- -... ..... .- --. --.. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 20:00:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5511416A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:00:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout1.cac.washington.edu (mxout1.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.134]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9A8743D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:00:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9]) by mxout1.cac.washington.edu (8.13.5+UW05.10/8.13.5+UW05.09) with ESMTP id k0CK0lwc023435 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:00:47 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [128.208.4.29] (shiina.dyn.cs.washington.edu [128.208.4.29]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.5+UW05.10/8.13.5+UW05.09) with ESMTP id k0CK0kE1004636 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:00:47 -0800 In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Garrett Cooper Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:01:43 -0800 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' Subject: Re: have bad fstab causing boot error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:00:48 -0000 On Jan 12, 2006, at 11:03 AM, fbsd_user wrote: > fstab is bad and boot drops me into "manual root filesystems spec" > > I answer ufs:ad0s1a > and get these messages > "warning / was not properly dismounted" > "warning R/W of / denied. filesystem is not clean run fcsk" > > when I enter fsck command nothing happens. > What is procedure to follow here??? Once it asks you for your shell in single user mode, you either choose it or just press enter for /bin/sh, and then you want to do this: # mount -o rw /dev/ad0s1a / #mount -a works nicely here too. # /sbin/fsck /dev/ad0s1a Be wary of fixing any issues if you don't have softupdates enabled. Also, you should fsck any other slices that you had mounted at the previous time when the system was improperly shutdown / the filesystems improperly dismounted. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 20:04:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DA9216A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:04:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberto.nunnari@supsi.ch) Received: from mail3.ticino.com (mail3.ticino.com [195.190.166.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31F7343D48 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:04:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberto.nunnari@supsi.ch) X-Spam-Score: 1 Received: from [192.168.1.6] (unverified [62.48.103.172]) by mail3.ticino.com (Rockliffe SMTPRA 6.1.22) with ESMTP id ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:04:04 +0100 Message-ID: <43C6B637.9050006@supsi.ch> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:04:07 +0100 From: Roberto Nunnari User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 X-Accept-Language: it-ch, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ceri Davies References: <43C64C52.9020209@supsi.ch> <8E000CF1-7D7E-4E63-8EE5-BB87BF9C44E8@submonkey.net> <43C6670E.5000500@supsi.ch> <20060112143730.GJ28781@submonkey.net> In-Reply-To: <20060112143730.GJ28781@submonkey.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: {Spam?} Re: patches and uname -a X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:04:08 -0000 Ceri Davies wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 03:26:22PM +0100, Roberto Nunnari wrote: > >>Ceri Davies wrote: >> >>>On 12 Jan 2006, at 12:32, Roberto Nunnari wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Hello. >>>> >>>>Please also answer to my mailbox as I'm not on the list. >>>> >>>>After upgrading by sources and build world, uname correctly >>>>reports the current version of the system >>>> >>>>Today for the first time I applied all the relevant patches >>>>instead and all went well. The box was 5.3-RELEASE-p23. >>>> >>>>The applied patches should correspond to 5.3-RELEASE-p24, but: >>>> >>>># uname -r >>>>5.3-RELEASE-p23 >>>> >>>>and: >>>> >>>># sysctl kern.version >>>>kern.version: FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p23 #0: Tue Jan 3 15:40:08 CET 2006 >>>>... >>>> >>>>I'd like to be able to see the correct version using >>>>'uname -r'.. >>>> >>>>Does anybody know how can you make uname report the >>>>real version? What if you recompile the kernel after >>>>patching the system? Would that do the trick? >>> >>> >>>Recompiling the kernel is the correct way to change the output of >>>uname(1), but before you do so, you should be aware that that patch >>>number is taken from the BRANCH variable in src/sys/conf/newvers.sh. >>>Check that it says "5.3-RELEASE-p24" before you waste time recompiling >>>the kernel. >>> >>>Ceri >> >>Thank you Ceri and Jaap for your time. >> >>Ceri, edit src/sys/conf/newvers.sh and replace >> >>BRANCH="RELEASE-p23" >>with >>BRANCH="RELEASE-p24" >> >>would be enough?? > > > That would work, but if you don't already have that string then there is > a possibility that you don't have all the patches, so please only change > it if you are %100 sure that you have. I cannot stress that enough. > > Ceri I checked the patches (cpio.patch ee.patch texindex5x.patch) and none of them tries to change src/sys/conf/newvers.sh nor src/UPDATING Also, I checked the output while applying the patches and there were no errors. So.. as I didn't find any other patches that are post p23, I edited newvers.sh, build a new kernel and rebooted. uname -r is now happy. Thank you again. Best regards. -- Robi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 20:04:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE9A216A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:04:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david@ion.lu) Received: from viefep20-int.chello.at (viefep12-int.chello.at [213.46.255.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4B5943D46 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:04:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david@ion.lu) Received: from [192.168.1.103] (really [213.47.196.20]) by viefep20-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 201-2131-118-104-20050224) with ESMTP id <20060112200412.XHCL24926.viefep20-int.chello.at@[192.168.1.103]> for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:04:12 +0100 Message-ID: <43C6B630.9090307@ion.lu> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:04:00 +0100 From: David Raison User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051014) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: subversion looking for libmysqlclient_r in the wrong path? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:04:17 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi folks, This is my first post to this mailing list, so please be kind :) I've tried installing subversion, but at some point of the compilation, I got an error message like: /usr/sbin/ld: cannot find -lmysqlclient_r I did a little research on the net and looked at gcc's output which stated that it was looking for the library in /usr/local/lib instead of /usr/local/lib/mysql, where all of the mysql librairies are. So I fixed the problem by symlinking the librairie into /usr/local/lib and subversion compiled alright. Now my question is.. (finally :) ) is that a bug with subversion or have I done something wrong during a portinstall process? Has somebody experienced the same kind of problem? cheers, David -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDxrYw/sLffsMilEkRAnwmAJwKWHkgK5jGvhZP74eCO4A5s/q9JwCeKpnA U9Cuk/zkoRgfR3QkQ0XZkYw= =1LHt -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 20:06:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F4B616A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:06:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from mxout5.cac.washington.edu (mxout5.cac.washington.edu [140.142.32.135]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA2443D81 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:06:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from youshi10@u.washington.edu) Received: from smtp.washington.edu (smtp.washington.edu [140.142.33.9]) by mxout5.cac.washington.edu (8.13.5+UW05.10/8.13.5+UW05.09) with ESMTP id k0CK6R6j027674 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:06:27 -0800 X-Auth-Received: from [128.208.4.29] (shiina.dyn.cs.washington.edu [128.208.4.29]) (authenticated authid=youshi10) by smtp.washington.edu (8.13.5+UW05.10/8.13.5+UW05.09) with ESMTP id k0CK6OpL006223 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:06:27 -0800 In-Reply-To: <000101c61764$7b590d80$2101a8c0@ZGISH> References: <000101c61764$7b590d80$2101a8c0@ZGISH> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Garrett Cooper Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:07:21 -0800 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Uwash-Spam: Gauge=IIIIIII, Probability=7%, Report='__C230066_P2 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __HAS_X_PRIORITY 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0' Subject: Re: How to access of linux and windows XP desktop simaltaneously X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:06:37 -0000 On Jan 12, 2006, at 2:39 AM, Kiffin Gish wrote: > How about a dual-boot system? > > -- > Kiffin Rex Gish > Gouda, The Netherlands > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of >> Anirban Adhikary >> Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 11:28 >> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> Subject: How to access of linux and windows XP desktop simaltaneously >> >> >> Hi guys >> This is Anirban here.Presently my os is Windows-XP.But i want >> to have the entire linux desktop along with my present >> desktop.I am connected with an existing network.Presently i >> get the LINUX server access with PUTTY software. I cant use >> telnet or SSH type utilities.But I want that I have the >> windows and linux destop simaltaneously.How can i do this? >> >> with regards >> Anirban. No offense, but *BSD != Linux, so the logic for asking that type of question here will most likely give you unfavorable responses. If you want simultaneous OSes, look into using an emulator like VMWare (usable on Linux, Windows), or VirtualPC (usable on Windows only), or try looking online for information about Wine if you want to run select Windows programs (requires a large degree of hacks to accomplish) on top of any POSIX enabled Unix operating system. -Garrett From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 20:07:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3C8816A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:07:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from aiolos.otenet.gr (aiolos.otenet.gr [195.170.0.93]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4F9F43D7C for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:07:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) by aiolos.otenet.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-8) with SMTP id k0CK7UKL023951; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:07:31 +0200 Received: by flame.pc (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 4642D11759; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:05:54 +0200 (EET) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:05:54 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: SPYRIDON PAPADOPOULOS Message-ID: <20060112200554.GA1067@flame.pc> References: <1137094538.8ba70fa0SP373@student.apu.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1137094538.8ba70fa0SP373@student.apu.ac.uk> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to create a manual page in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:07:34 -0000 On 2006-01-12 19:35, SPYRIDON PAPADOPOULOS wrote: > Hi all, > > Can anyone describe/give info, of how one can create a manual > page for a custom program in FreeBSD. A manual page that would > be accessible through the #man command. Is it possible? Look at the existing manpages for examples, i.e.: /usr/src/bin/ls/ls.1 Then, you may get a good start for writing the groff source of a manpage by copying and modifying one of the files: $ ls -l /usr/share/examples/mdoc/*.? -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel - 3620 Jan 12 20:16 /usr/share/examples/mdoc/example.1 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel - 7658 Jan 12 20:16 /usr/share/examples/mdoc/example.3 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel - 3079 Jan 12 20:16 /usr/share/examples/mdoc/example.4 -r--r--r-- 1 root wheel - 7757 Jan 12 20:16 /usr/share/examples/mdoc/example.9 The complete reference of all groff mdoc macros that you can use when writing the document of the manpage is described in groff_mdoc(7): $ man groff_mdoc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 20:14:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1407616A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:14:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dkelly@Grumpy.DynDNS.org) Received: from smtp.knology.net (smtp.knology.net [24.214.63.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 279D643D4C for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:14:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dkelly@Grumpy.DynDNS.org) Received: (qmail 7248 invoked by uid 0); 12 Jan 2006 20:14:16 -0000 Received: from user-69-73-60-132.knology.net (HELO Grumpy.DynDNS.org) (69.73.60.132) by smtp1.knology.net with SMTP; 12 Jan 2006 20:14:16 -0000 Received: by Grumpy.DynDNS.org (Postfix, from userid 928) id 73A6961D8; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:14:15 -0600 (CST) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:14:15 -0600 From: David Kelly To: SPYRIDON PAPADOPOULOS Message-ID: <20060112201415.GB44823@Grumpy.DynDNS.org> References: <1137094538.8ba70fa0SP373@student.apu.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1137094538.8ba70fa0SP373@student.apu.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to create a manual page in FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:14:18 -0000 On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 07:35:38PM +0000, SPYRIDON PAPADOPOULOS wrote: > Hi all, > > Can anyone describe/give info, of how one can create a manual page for > a custom program in FreeBSD. A manual page that would be accessible > through the #man command. Is it possible? Study troff and write your man page with any old text editor. Suggest you place it in /usr/local/man/ the same as many others. Easier than learning troff from the beginning would be to take an existing man page and make a copy of it. Edit the copy. Proofread every little change. Suggest /usr/share/man1/man.1.gz would be a good man page to use as your template. Gzipping man pages is optional. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net ======================================================================== Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 20:18:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D8DB16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:18:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wayne@manor.msen.com) Received: from manor.msen.com (manor.msen.com [148.59.4.66]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3F0B43D46 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:18:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wayne@manor.msen.com) Received: from manor.msen.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by manor.msen.com (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k0CKIOc1007828 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:18:24 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from wayne@manor.msen.com) Message-Id: <200601122018.k0CKIOc1007828@manor.msen.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: "Michael R. Wayne" Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:18:24 -0500 Sender: wayne@manor.msen.com Subject: Any experience with HP DL360 G4P SATA? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:18:26 -0000 After reading the description of this box by Marc G. Fournier, I did some digging and the features look very interesting (particluarly the fact that one NEVER needs a monitor or keyboard to configure it and access is via ssh). Marc opted for the SAS version of the box and seems to have it working properly. I'm wondering if anyone has any experience with the SATA version of this box, in particular does the RAID work? We tend to use a lot of servers where disk speed is not relevant and a couple of small mirrored disks wold work. Digging through Google with DL360 G4P SATA freebsd did not show anything useful, hence the post here. /\/\ \/\/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 20:19:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC21916A420 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:19:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B9CF43D48 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:18:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t12so360347wxc for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:18:59 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=BcF0KTciZMmiYp6eY7Pz8kk9HuB0C/M5sGaH5uW3kxN/ziIHov8pO3tEU8DNl2Ur4TXciFnHKUXeq66jahIplntXUmTUK/RIRiZat5ZTXQp3RR5uNRTTjE72Ekputqm8Mmfpf/RsLP/PoeAQYE10URF1kT3Y+Jj5ZbkU+P8LqKQ= Received: by 10.70.25.12 with SMTP id 12mr2818772wxy; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:18:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.57.17 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:18:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:18:58 -0600 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: Roberto Nunnari In-Reply-To: <43C6B637.9050006@supsi.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <43C64C52.9020209@supsi.ch> <8E000CF1-7D7E-4E63-8EE5-BB87BF9C44E8@submonkey.net> <43C6670E.5000500@supsi.ch> <20060112143730.GJ28781@submonkey.net> <43C6B637.9050006@supsi.ch> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: {Spam?} Re: patches and uname -a X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:19:03 -0000 On 1/12/06, Roberto Nunnari wrote: > > Ceri Davies wrote: > > > That would work, but if you don't already have that string then there i= s > > a possibility that you don't have all the patches, so please only chang= e > > it if you are %100 sure that you have. I cannot stress that enough. > > I checked the patches (cpio.patch ee.patch texindex5x.patch) and none > of them tries to change src/sys/conf/newvers.sh nor src/UPDATING > > So.. as I didn't find any other patches that are post p23, I edited > newvers.sh, build a new kernel and rebooted. uname -r is now happy. > > If you had set it to TYPE=3D"FreeBSD" REVISION=3D"9.1" BRANCH=3D"STALE" You could run software from the future (some time in late 2009, I believe). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 20:19:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1060F16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:19:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberto.nunnari@supsi.ch) Received: from mail3.ticino.com (mail3.ticino.com [195.190.166.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7E2643D68 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:19:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberto.nunnari@supsi.ch) X-Spam-Score: 1 Received: from [192.168.1.6] (unverified [62.48.103.172]) by mail3.ticino.com (Rockliffe SMTPRA 6.1.22) with ESMTP id for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:19:30 +0100 Message-ID: <43C6B9D5.9020102@supsi.ch> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:19:33 +0100 From: Roberto Nunnari User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 X-Accept-Language: it-ch, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" References: <43C64C52.9020209@supsi.ch> <8E000CF1-7D7E-4E63-8EE5-BB87BF9C44E8@submonkey.net> <43C6670E.5000500@supsi.ch> <20060112143730.GJ28781@submonkey.net> In-Reply-To: <20060112143730.GJ28781@submonkey.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: {Spam?} Re: patches and uname -a X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:19:41 -0000 Ceri Davies wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 03:26:22PM +0100, Roberto Nunnari wrote: > >>Ceri Davies wrote: >> >>>On 12 Jan 2006, at 12:32, Roberto Nunnari wrote: >>> >>> >>>>Hello. >>>> >>>>Please also answer to my mailbox as I'm not on the list. >>>> >>>>After upgrading by sources and build world, uname correctly >>>>reports the current version of the system >>>> >>>>Today for the first time I applied all the relevant patches >>>>instead and all went well. The box was 5.3-RELEASE-p23. >>>> >>>>The applied patches should correspond to 5.3-RELEASE-p24, but: >>>> >>>># uname -r >>>>5.3-RELEASE-p23 >>>> >>>>and: >>>> >>>># sysctl kern.version >>>>kern.version: FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p23 #0: Tue Jan 3 15:40:08 CET 2006 >>>>... >>>> >>>>I'd like to be able to see the correct version using >>>>'uname -r'.. >>>> >>>>Does anybody know how can you make uname report the >>>>real version? What if you recompile the kernel after >>>>patching the system? Would that do the trick? >>> >>> >>>Recompiling the kernel is the correct way to change the output of >>>uname(1), but before you do so, you should be aware that that patch >>>number is taken from the BRANCH variable in src/sys/conf/newvers.sh. >>>Check that it says "5.3-RELEASE-p24" before you waste time recompiling >>>the kernel. >>> >>>Ceri >> >>Thank you Ceri and Jaap for your time. >> >>Ceri, edit src/sys/conf/newvers.sh and replace >> >>BRANCH="RELEASE-p23" >>with >>BRANCH="RELEASE-p24" >> >>would be enough?? > > > That would work, but if you don't already have that string then there is > a possibility that you don't have all the patches, so please only change > it if you are %100 sure that you have. I cannot stress that enough. > > Ceri Answering to myself.. Probably the best thing to do is to use anoncvs to checkout the two files (UPDATING and newvers.sh) and put them in their place before making the new kernel.. Again, best regards. -- Robi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 20:20:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB4CD16A420 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:20:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta13.adelphia.net (mta13.adelphia.net [68.168.78.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3B3D43D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:20:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([24.50.210.221]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060112202034.CUUY8904.mta13.adelphia.net@barbish>; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:20:34 -0500 From: "fbsd_user" To: "Garrett Cooper" , Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:20:33 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: have bad stab causing boot error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:20:39 -0000 On Jan 12, 2006, at 11:03 AM, fbsd_user wrote: > fstab is bad and boot drops me into "manual root filesystems spec" > > I answer ufs:ad0s1a > and get these messages > "warning / was not properly dismounted" > "warning R/W of / denied. filesystem is not clean run fcsk" > > when I enter fsck command nothing happens. > What is procedure to follow here??? Once it asks you for your shell in single user mode, you either choose it or just press enter for /bin/sh, and then you want to do this: # mount -o rw /dev/ad0s1a / #mount -a works nicely here too. # /sbin/fsck /dev/ad0s1a Be wary of fixing any issues if you don't have softupdates enabled. Also, you should fsck any other slices that you had mounted at the previous time when the system was improperly shutdown / the filesystems improperly dismounted. -Garrett _______________________________________________ -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Garrett Cooper Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 3:02 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: have bad fstab causing boot error nope that did not work. by the way this is 5.4 version get this message "warning R/W of / denied. filesystem is not clean run fcsk" mount with /dev in it get syntax error From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 20:29:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7E8E16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:29:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-3-1-cust208.cdif.cable.ntl.com [82.31.78.208]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE13C43D75 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:29:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from ceri by shrike.submonkey.net with local (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Ex94P-000KqJ-Mx; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:29:17 +0000 Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:29:17 +0000 From: Ceri Davies To: Roberto Nunnari Message-ID: <20060112202917.GL28781@submonkey.net> Mail-Followup-To: Ceri Davies , Roberto Nunnari , "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" References: <43C64C52.9020209@supsi.ch> <8E000CF1-7D7E-4E63-8EE5-BB87BF9C44E8@submonkey.net> <43C6670E.5000500@supsi.ch> <20060112143730.GJ28781@submonkey.net> <43C6B637.9050006@supsi.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AQNmCumFClRcGgHG" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43C6B637.9050006@supsi.ch> X-PGP: finger ceri@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Sender: Ceri Davies Cc: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: {Spam?} Re: patches and uname -a X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:29:25 -0000 --AQNmCumFClRcGgHG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 09:04:07PM +0100, Roberto Nunnari wrote: >=20 > I checked the patches (cpio.patch ee.patch texindex5x.patch) and none > of them tries to change src/sys/conf/newvers.sh nor src/UPDATING There is an ipfw one as well. Cheers, Ceri --=20 Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former. -- Einstein (attrib.) --AQNmCumFClRcGgHG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDxrwdocfcwTS3JF8RAjheAKCU2JIHgqK3/UMFpEHg+QO1hd2jpACgkQXD oLFFO9YohcGiXhgSLuZce3o= =tiY2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --AQNmCumFClRcGgHG-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 20:31:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D2F616A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:31:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mj001@rogers.com) Received: from smtp102.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp102.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [206.190.36.80]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BAB8443D48 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:31:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mj001@rogers.com) Received: (qmail 50788 invoked from network); 12 Jan 2006 20:31:15 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=Received:Subject:From:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:References:Content-Type:Date:Message-Id:Mime-Version:X-Mailer:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=AeeCHS2zrsCCb99fTUW+AX5h3y0/le9XrEidlOyZV5QL93Im5AqkTFh6C6XgLxu5EUv6cn2rdDI7bV8TsaAwmjDDdrmK7fP36oBuO28v6jgThBR0X6kMpf08D0OT85aM6QW9Gjh9dBmhnFhPpqHistE1qJphtbFkRbpTMmMKa0A= ; Received: from unknown (HELO chaucer.jeays.ca) (mj001@rogers.com@72.139.51.96 with plain) by smtp102.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Jan 2006 20:31:14 -0000 From: Mike Jeays To: Uncle Deejy-Pooh In-Reply-To: <43C70BE1.6080406@ntlworld.com> References: <43C70BE1.6080406@ntlworld.com> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:31:16 -0500 Message-Id: <1137097876.56514.15.camel@chaucer.jeays.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.2.3 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:31:16 -0000 On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 18:09 -0800, Uncle Deejy-Pooh wrote: > Hey, I've spent the day using pc-bsd, and I quite like it ! Can I remain > on the > mailing list, or are people already forming hollow squares to drum me out ? > > Regards to all for the New Year, > Deej > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Anyone can remain on the mailing list. People only get drummed out if they make a real nuisance of themselves with irrelevant or offensive postings. Welcome to the BSD world. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 20:38:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D71D16A442 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:38:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (dsl231-043-140.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net [216.231.43.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CCCA43D62 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:38:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: from tao.thought.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tao.thought.org (8.13.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k0CKcDj0035037; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:38:14 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline@tao.thought.org) Received: (from kline@localhost) by tao.thought.org (8.13.4/8.13.1/Submit) id k0CKcCsu035036; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:38:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kline) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:38:12 -0800 From: Gary Kline To: "Li, Qing" Message-ID: <20060112203811.GA34851@thought.org> References: <326DB2F7011D9347B156DA019416F3F703AD6CDB@bcs-mail4.internal.cacheflow.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <326DB2F7011D9347B156DA019416F3F703AD6CDB@bcs-mail4.internal.cacheflow.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Organization: Thought Unlimited. Public service Unix since 1986. X-Of_Interest: Observing 19 years of service to the Unix community Cc: Doug Poland , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Alan Gerber Subject: Re: Sound on Dell D600 laptop X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:38:21 -0000 On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 10:55:42AM -0800, Li, Qing wrote: > > Thanks all. > > > > > snd_ich_load="YES" > > > > I don't have the above, wasn't quite sure which one > to load because it's a SigmaTel, though > /usr/src/sys/dev/sound/pcm/ac97.c appears to include it. > > I'll give it a try. > > Thanks again. > > -- Qing This is a related question concerning "getting sound working on FreeBSD":: in revs previous, you used to have to compile the kernel modules into KERNCONF. Why the change to a /boot config file, one? And if I use the old KERNCONF method, will it make any difference, two? gary -- Gary Kline kline@thought.org www.thought.org Public service Unix From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 20:40:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97DC416A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:40:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from kane.otenet.gr (kane.otenet.gr [195.170.0.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CDFCA43D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:40:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) by kane.otenet.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-8) with SMTP id k0CKeA0s010610; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:40:10 +0200 Received: by flame.pc (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A286E11759; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:38:37 +0200 (EET) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:38:37 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: fbsd_user Message-ID: <20060112203837.GA32499@flame.pc> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: Garrett Cooper , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: have bad stab causing boot error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:40:31 -0000 On 2006-01-12 15:20, fbsd_user wrote: >On Jan 12, 2006, at 11:03 AM, fbsd_user wrote: >> fstab is bad and boot drops me into "manual root filesystems spec" >> >> I answer ufs:ad0s1a >> and get these messages >> "warning / was not properly dismounted" >> "warning R/W of / denied. filesystem is not clean run fcsk" >> >> when I enter fsck command nothing happens. >> What is procedure to follow here??? > > Once it asks you for your shell in single user mode, you either > choose it or just press enter for /bin/sh, and then you want to do > this: > # mount -o rw /dev/ad0s1a / #mount -a works nicely here too. > # /sbin/fsck /dev/ad0s1a Careful with the order of those commands. You are *NOT* allowed to fsck a filesystem that has been mounted as read-write. You also missed an invocation of adjkerntz, which is pretty much mandatory for getting the timestamps of files right. The correct thing to do, would be (comments in parentheses): # adjkerntz -i (adjust kernel time) # fsck -p (check all filesystems) # mount -u / (mount root fs as read-write) # mount -a (mount all other filesystems) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 20:48:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B64E616A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:48:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: from mail.el.net (mail.el.net [68.165.89.91]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15BDE43D7D for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:48:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: (qmail 61280 invoked by uid 1008); 12 Jan 2006 20:49:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.el.net) (127.0.0.1) by mail.el.net with SMTP; 12 Jan 2006 20:49:06 -0000 Received: from 24.90.33.115 (SquirrelMail authenticated user kalin@el.net) by mail.el.net with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:49:06 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <61086.24.90.33.115.1137098946.squirrel@mail.el.net> In-Reply-To: <1137093366.8ba70fa0SP373@student.apu.ac.uk> References: <1137093366.8ba70fa0SP373@student.apu.ac.uk> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:49:06 -0500 (EST) From: "kalin mintchev" To: SP373@student.apu.ac.uk User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re: missing /dev/dsp X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:48:13 -0000 > Hi again, > > Please don't try to open your laptop, i have a T30 here out of warranty. > Just call them back, they will not charge you probably. thanks... it is under warranty. but i really need it here to work. some of it needs sound... i wouldn't really go into the laptop myself - i've done that in the past and althuoght it was partially successful i don't want to go through it again. if it was a desktop maybe but not with this laptop... the problem is that if i deal with them over the phone the second i mention that i'm not using windows they turn red and say 'we are not supporting your machine then. you have to reimage (?!?) it'. uhh.. reimage?!?... ok... > >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: "kalin mintchev" >> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 02:13:41 -0500 (EST) >> Subject: missing /dev/dsp >> >> >> >> hi all.. >> >> i sent my t30 to ibm to replace a not working ram slot and i got it >> back >> in less then 48 hrs. pretty good. except the /dev/dsp is missing. >> >> i don't see any cards in the dmesg but i know that the audio card is >> "SoundBlaster compatible". my system is 5.4 and according to the >> handbook >> devfs should figure it out - i haven't had to do this before... >> a have the audio enabled in the kernel... pcm... >> >> any ideas why is the dsp missing? i think they did bios upgrade - is >> that >> what screwed it up? >> >> thanks... >> >> -- >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> >> > > > -- > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 21:01:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D201716A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:01:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from ext-gw.lemis.com (ext-gw.lemis.com [150.101.14.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A28743D4C for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:01:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from wantadilla.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.135]) by ext-gw.lemis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19256131BEF; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 07:31:45 +1030 (CST) Received: by wantadilla.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id E7B2585C15; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 07:31:44 +1030 (CST) Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 07:31:44 +1030 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: Igor Robul Message-ID: <20060112210144.GR73071@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <1965019375.20060111213647@interia.pl> <20060112072003.GB52424@sysadm.stc> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="9j/QU+CmmrcVJkVI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060112072003.GB52424@sysadm.stc> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 VoIP: sip:0871270137@sip.internode.on.net WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pooomooocyyyy ;( X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:01:46 -0000 --9j/QU+CmmrcVJkVI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday, 12 January 2006 at 10:20:03 +0300, Igor Robul wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 07:57:04AM +0100, Sasa Stupar wrote: >> >> Please write in english if you want any help. > > There are enought Polish users of FreeBSD who can give more helpful > answer than you. If you cant give meaningful answer, why asnwer at > all? I think the point is that this is an English language forum. While I have sympathy for people who don't speak English well, I don't think that justifies spamming people with text they can't understand. I also have sympathies for people who speak only English, and they're a much larger group. Isn't there a Polish mailing list? Greg -- When replying to this message, please copy the original recipients. If you don't, I may ignore the reply or reply to the original recipients. For more information, see http://www.lemis.com/questions.html See complete headers for address and phone numbers. --9j/QU+CmmrcVJkVI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDxsO4IubykFB6QiMRAtywAKCKQ0/r/mP17VvEfa3NnANtC+TeIwCfQazf QrHTC+PcN1gmGPjSrI17538= =B/qY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --9j/QU+CmmrcVJkVI-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 21:08:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C0D16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:08:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Received: from mail.scls.lib.wi.us (mail.scls.lib.wi.us [198.150.40.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3147C43D4C for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:08:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Received: from [172.26.2.238] ([172.26.2.238]) by mail.scls.lib.wi.us (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k0CL8kR4087672; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:08:46 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Message-ID: <43C6C55E.5000703@scls.lib.wi.us> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:08:46 -0600 From: Greg Barniskis User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin McCormick References: <200601121958.k0CJw9hn091722@dc.cis.okstate.edu> In-Reply-To: <200601121958.k0CJw9hn091722@dc.cis.okstate.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Strange Failure Mode in FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:08:47 -0000 Martin McCormick wrote: > In > rc.firewall, there is a place where one can include a table of local > rules and that's where I am doing something wrong. The place in > rc.firewall reads: > > # filename - will load the rules in the given filename (full path required) This section of rc.firewall refers to valid values you can place in rc.conf for firewall_type. In rc.conf you can name any of the types defined in rc.firewall /or/ you can specify a file of your own (instead of rc.firewall). I don't think you can invoke rc.firewall /and/ another file you name. Well, OK, surely there is a way to do that, but that functionality is not the intent of this part of rc.firewall and rc.conf as I understand it. I'm sure that if you put your custom rules in a shell file that you can use rc or cron to load those rules at boot time; you'd just need to be careful with rule numbering, maybe use ipfw sets for rule ordering, etc. Maybe easier to just cp rc.firewall custom.ipfw, edit to your needs and use firewall_type="/etc/custom.ipfw" -- Greg Barniskis, Computer Systems Integrator South Central Library System (SCLS) Library Interchange Network (LINK) , (608) 266-6348 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 21:10:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CD9916A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:10:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from redtick@sbcglobal.net) Received: from web81201.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web81201.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.199.105]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4CB5643D4C for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:10:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from redtick@sbcglobal.net) Received: (qmail 44331 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Jan 2006 21:10:22 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=Kp1X0RwQEi4Q1ITIGtG1PKLBy91Efv4UebNnPoUyNtpk3bzSX0y2+QZlP5xXsyZWVrxYefAcmUCR2UM/Yb1W+fwuD6SJ49libq+qzpW7M+sNvMBbj6JGqpaZzMw0c0STSoGlLEYqJgW/RUccPpUz3bgGfGFy18I2SCiNgtoAapQ= ; Message-ID: <20060112211022.44329.qmail@web81201.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [12.171.187.21] by web81201.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:10:22 PST Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:10:22 -0800 (PST) From: Mark Busby To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: fetch ports and /stand/sysinstall X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:10:24 -0000 I have several freebsd boxes on 2 different connections, each one is sitting at or about this date. uname -a 6.0-STABLE FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE #2: Mon Jan 9 15:05:38 CST 2006 While trying to add ports or pkgs I get connection refused errors. Also when using /stand/sysinstall I get, can't find the 6.0-STABLE. I then change to "any" in options, I get not found on this server try another. Other servers give the same msg. Google has not been my friend on this problem. I have been using freebsd from 4.0, so I have installed a few pkgs, but never had this much pain. Is there a policy change on dynamic ip connections? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 21:18:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 064A716A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:18:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Received: from wmptl.net (fw1.wmptl.com [216.8.159.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61B9943D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:18:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Received: from [10.0.0.104] (r3140ca.wmptl.net [10.0.0.104]) by wmptl.net (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k0CLIkZC034699 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:18:46 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from nvidican@wmptl.com) Message-ID: <43C6C7BB.2080808@wmptl.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:18:51 -0500 From: Nathan Vidican User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: 0.111 () RATWR10_MESSID X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.44 Cc: Subject: Slightly OT, question about nvidia X driver & screensaver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:18:49 -0000 Have the nvidia driver installed on my laptop, it's running Linux/amd64... I'm a FreeBSD guy, and relatively new to linux. To be honest, not thrilled at all - but it works, hardware support for this thing under FreeBSD's just not there yet. So platform use aside, the problem should be fairly simple and the same fix on anything using nvidia's driver for x: My screen blanks, there are no settings inside of X, inside the bios/power-management, or in kde, I even went so far as to disable power management entirely... the screen blanks (like power/screen saver) after a period of inactivity, really annoying. I havn't timed it, but figure it's at about 5 minutes. Someone had mentioned in an email on this list before how the nvidia driver gives them the ability to screensave/powersave a while back while talking about something else; I only vaguely remember the thread and havn't been able to find it searching the archives - but was hoping that if someone out there knows how it does it, perhaps someone else may know how to stop it. So anyhow, my question is this: How do I make it stop? I don't want my laptop's screen to turn off - especially so when it's plugged into a/c power, often I'm reading an article and it blanks on me - course I can just move the mouse and things come back, but it is really annoying. Any ideas? Please no RTFM, I'm not a newbie over here - and I've been reading nvidia's documentation up and down and can't find anything on the subject (though I did manage to find a few other cool tweaks). -- Nathan Vidican nvidican@wmptl.com Windsor Match Plate & Tool Ltd. http://www.wmptl.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 21:23:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF8E816A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:23:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (dc.cis.okstate.edu [139.78.100.219]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6149F43D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:23:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Received: from dc.cis.okstate.edu (localhost.cis.okstate.edu [127.0.0.1]) by dc.cis.okstate.edu (8.12.6/8.12.6) with ESMTP id k0CLNPhn001676 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:23:25 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from martin@dc.cis.okstate.edu) Message-Id: <200601122123.k0CLNPhn001676@dc.cis.okstate.edu> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:23:25 -0600 From: Martin McCormick Subject: Re: Strange Failure Mode in FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:23:26 -0000 Greg Barniskis writes: >This section of rc.firewall refers to valid values you can place in >rc.conf for firewall_type. In rc.conf you can name any of the types >defined in rc.firewall /or/ you can specify a file of your own >(instead of rc.firewall). I don't think you can invoke rc.firewall >/and/ another file you name. That clears things up greatly! Thank you. I'll just make a new file that combines rc.firewall and the extra rules I had and reference that from rc.conf.local. Again, many thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 21:25:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC62316A420 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:25:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.cristescu@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2063443D5F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:25:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from v.cristescu@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i1so492079wra for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:25:08 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=AV2QM6IeS9iPA+PQJS8m1dcc9T2/1LWQIsAwUWcLfIgwWZE8o3TWyH2xXmd6jrmWmaCqUWxJT+2jWAPNM4lzPGAaUS7hAhLK1SWyQaFRNfLm/wDF0hJAJzQpmW9lX+sPKwpmOxTq7oDndRiU7XzkUAeu7VJBfnPFlZf4l6x4rhw= Received: by 10.64.96.18 with SMTP id t18mr481497qbb; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:25:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.47.5 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:25:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:25:08 +0200 From: Vasile Cristescu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: pf question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:25:20 -0000 does pf has something like " ipfw -d show " ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 21:28:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15EBB16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:28:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rasputnik@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99A1D43D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:28:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rasputnik@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so339993wxc for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:28:00 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=CJHwuU05XpjQgs7+TqVUUxrjocuTU/CXI/uAXZlsVCICv+BHeQ31J/lZkbjlK5QhtJi7wshLF2iWGb7nniJ+q3iF8kkrdAv4Zu/tN4LW2aS5LAChxiqHoVZVF1M2Hkfj4A6Rcldq6jHTj0g/Yq2kvry0nkbyWDluqYWDKH+ePj0= Received: by 10.70.62.19 with SMTP id k19mr2854920wxa; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:28:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.69.17 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:28:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3f1760601121328s74787a5cr@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:28:00 +0000 From: Dick Davies To: Vasile Cristescu In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pf question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:28:02 -0000 On 12/01/06, Vasile Cristescu wrote: > does pf has something like " ipfw -d show " ? I don't know. What does 'ipfw -d show' do? -- Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns http://number9.hellooperator.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 21:28:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EB7D16A422 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:28:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta13.adelphia.net (mta13.adelphia.net [68.168.78.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45A6643D46 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:28:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([69.172.31.117]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060112212814.IMEM8904.mta13.adelphia.net@barbish>; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:28:14 -0500 From: "fbsd_user" To: "Greg Barniskis" , "Martin McCormick" Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:28:09 -0500 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <43C6C55E.5000703@scls.lib.wi.us> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Strange Failure Mode in FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:28:16 -0000 The firewall section of the handbook states that the rc.firewall file is an example. You really should read the firewall section of the handbook and use the working examples contained there. -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Greg Barniskis Sent: Thursday, January 12, 2006 4:09 PM To: Martin McCormick Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Strange Failure Mode in FreeBSD 4.11 Martin McCormick wrote: > In > rc.firewall, there is a place where one can include a table of local > rules and that's where I am doing something wrong. The place in > rc.firewall reads: > > # filename - will load the rules in the given filename (full path required) This section of rc.firewall refers to valid values you can place in rc.conf for firewall_type. In rc.conf you can name any of the types defined in rc.firewall /or/ you can specify a file of your own (instead of rc.firewall). I don't think you can invoke rc.firewall /and/ another file you name. Well, OK, surely there is a way to do that, but that functionality is not the intent of this part of rc.firewall and rc.conf as I understand it. I'm sure that if you put your custom rules in a shell file that you can use rc or cron to load those rules at boot time; you'd just need to be careful with rule numbering, maybe use ipfw sets for rule ordering, etc. Maybe easier to just cp rc.firewall custom.ipfw, edit to your needs and use firewall_type="/etc/custom.ipfw" -- Greg Barniskis, Computer Systems Integrator South Central Library System (SCLS) Library Interchange Network (LINK) , (608) 266-6348 _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 21:33:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C214016A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:33:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ri@beldurnik.com) Received: from beat2.beldurnik.com (beldurnik-host57.dsl.visi.com [209.98.251.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 319F343D48 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:33:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ri@beldurnik.com) Received: from [192.168.42.102] ([192.168.17.251]) by beat2.beldurnik.com (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k0CLT9wd091467; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:29:09 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ri@beldurnik.com) Message-ID: <43C6CB1A.2040907@beldurnik.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:33:14 -0600 From: "Richard C. Isaacson" User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20051228) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dick Davies References: <3f1760601121328s74787a5cr@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3f1760601121328s74787a5cr@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Vasile Cristescu , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pf question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:33:16 -0000 Are you asking if you can print out rules? pfctl -sr -v Dick Davies wrote: > On 12/01/06, Vasile Cristescu wrote: > >> does pf has something like " ipfw -d show " ? >> > > I don't know. What does 'ipfw -d show' do? > > -- > Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns > http://number9.hellooperator.net/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 21:48:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A59416A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:48:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from aiolos.otenet.gr (aiolos.otenet.gr [195.170.0.93]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5311B43D4C for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:48:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) by aiolos.otenet.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-8) with SMTP id k0CLmDh8029942; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:48:17 +0200 Received: by flame.pc (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 45F9711723; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:46:38 +0200 (EET) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:46:38 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Greg Barniskis Message-ID: <20060112214638.GA97115@flame.pc> References: <200601121958.k0CJw9hn091722@dc.cis.okstate.edu> <43C6C55E.5000703@scls.lib.wi.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43C6C55E.5000703@scls.lib.wi.us> Cc: Martin McCormick , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Strange Failure Mode in FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:48:29 -0000 On 2006-01-12 15:08, Greg Barniskis wrote: >Martin McCormick wrote: >> In rc.firewall, there is a place where one can include a table of >> local rules and that's where I am doing something wrong. The place >> in rc.firewall reads: >> >># filename - will load the rules in the given filename (full path required) > > This section of rc.firewall refers to valid values you can place in > rc.conf for firewall_type. No, it refers that exactly what the comment says. You can write your rules (just the rules, without any ipfw(8) command invocations) in a file and use: firewall_type="/etc/ipfw.rules" in your `rc.conf' file. The manpage of rc.conf explains this in detail at the firewall_xxxx variables part: firewall_type (str) Names the firewall type from the selection in /etc/rc.firewall, or the file which contains the local firewall ruleset. Valid selections from /etc/rc.firewall are: open unrestricted IP access closed all IP services disabled, except via ``lo0'' client basic protection for a workstation simple basic protection for a LAN. If a filename is specified, the full path must be given. > Well, OK, surely there is a way to do that, but that functionality > is not the intent of this part of rc.firewall and rc.conf as I > understand it. It works, it's supported and it does exactly what it says it should do. Why not? :-) > I'm sure that if you put your custom rules in a shell file that > you can use rc or cron to load those rules at boot time; you'd > just need to be careful with rule numbering, maybe use ipfw > sets for rule ordering, etc. > > Maybe easier to just > > cp rc.firewall custom.ipfw, edit to your needs and use > firewall_type="/etc/custom.ipfw" This is probably more error-prone than writing just: add block ip from 10.0.0.0/8 to any since shell scripts come with all sorts of quoting, meta-character evaluation, etc. I find it much much easier to use an `ipfw.rules' file that contains only the rules. No shell commands at all. But then, this is clearly a matter of personal taste :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 21:50:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E103416A43B for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:50:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from rosebud.otenet.gr (rosebud.otenet.gr [195.170.0.94]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2884643D5A for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:50:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (aris.bedc.ondsl.gr [62.103.39.226]) by rosebud.otenet.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-8) with SMTP id k0CLnrX6008367; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:49:56 +0200 Received: by flame.pc (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 8EDB611723; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:48:20 +0200 (EET) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:48:20 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: fbsd_user Message-ID: <20060112214820.GB97115@flame.pc> References: <43C6C55E.5000703@scls.lib.wi.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: Martin McCormick , Greg Barniskis , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Strange Failure Mode in FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:50:05 -0000 On 2006-01-12 16:28, fbsd_user wrote: > The firewall section of the handbook states that the > rc.firewall file is an example. > You really should read the firewall section of the handbook > and use the working examples contained there. The Handbook section is blatantly wrong, if you ask me. Neither the manpage of rc.firewall nor the script itself mention this. The relevant bits should be stripped off from the Handbook, as they are clearly misinformed. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 21:51:46 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 617AD16A420 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:51:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from wolf.pjkh.com (wolf.pjkh.com [66.228.196.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EAB643D64 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:51:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wolf.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1168B172A5 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:51:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from wolf.pjkh.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (wolf.pjkh.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 53481-03 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:51:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by wolf.pjkh.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A388E1729E; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:51:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wolf.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AA9217291 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:51:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:51:38 -0800 (PST) From: Philip Hallstrom To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060112134825.Q53590@wolf.pjkh.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at pjkh.com Cc: Subject: How to boot from a slice other than "a"? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:51:46 -0000 Hi all - I've got a remote server and for one reason or another have it setup like this: Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on /dev/da0s1a 248M 180M 48M 79% / /dev/da0s1h 14G 496M 13G 4% /mnt /dev/da0s1h has an exact copy of /dev/da0s1a using dump/restore. I want to configure things so that the next time I reboot it will automatically boot from /dev/da0s1h without me having to do anything (since it's remote I can't interrupt the boot process). I know I need to modify fstab on da0s1h. And if I was on the console I'd interrupt the boot process and type in 0:da(0,h)/boot/loader, but I'm not. And I'm not entirely sure what files to tweak to make that happen. I've read the boot/loader manpages, but am just not getting it today. Anyone know what files to tweak? -philip From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 21:53:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC1AF16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:53:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (imap.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.187.76.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66D2543D46 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:53:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0CLrhlo017322; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:53:43 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Message-ID: <43C6CFE1.9000706@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:53:37 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman Organization: Infracaninophile User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051221) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Richard C. Isaacson" References: <3f1760601121328s74787a5cr@mail.gmail.com> <43C6CB1A.2040907@beldurnik.com> In-Reply-To: <43C6CB1A.2040907@beldurnik.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-ripemd160; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig248D425390898EAFBC459ACB" X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:::1]); Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:53:44 +0000 (GMT) X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1239/Thu Jan 12 11:36:22 2006 on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on happy-idiot-talk.infracaninophile.co.uk Cc: Vasile Cristescu , Dick Davies , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pf question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:53:58 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig248D425390898EAFBC459ACB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Richard C. Isaacson wrote: > Dick Davies wrote: >> On 12/01/06, Vasile Cristescu wrote: >>> does pf has something like " ipfw -d show " ? >> I don't know. What does 'ipfw -d show' do? > Are you asking if you can print out rules? > pfctl -sr -v '-d' in ipfw includes the dynamic rules in the list output. The command the OP needs is: pfctl -ss -vv which prints the state table. Unlike ipfw(8), it's not in the same format as the rule list, but it tells you what you need to know. Cheers, Matthew -- Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig248D425390898EAFBC459ACB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDxs/n8Mjk52CukIwRA8fmAJ9Z5USjqRVKt6AjenQx9ahzwQcAsQCcCvNt Ni0odJCtKWJlkSsFGJr2py4= =sR0y -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig248D425390898EAFBC459ACB-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 21:54:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40C5416A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:54:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from SP373@student.apu.ac.uk) Received: from mailhub-out.apu.ac.uk (mailhub-out.apu.ac.uk [193.63.55.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80A8843D46 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:54:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from SP373@student.apu.ac.uk) Received: from smtp.cam.apu.ac.uk ([193.63.55.9]:40821) by mailhub.anglia.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ExAOQ-00017j-Lu for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:54:02 +0000 Received: from cam-netmail.netware.anglia.ac.uk ([194.83.45.141]:36292 helo=student.apu.ac.uk) by boswell.cam.apu.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ExAOL-00029f-Ca for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:53:57 +0000 Received: from SP373 [172.212.93.178] by student.apu.ac.uk with NetMail ModWeb Module; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:53:46 +0000 From: "SPYRIDON PAPADOPOULOS" To: kalin@el.net Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:53:46 +0000 X-Mailer: NetMail ModWeb Module X-Sender: SP373 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <1137102826.1c38bc0SP373@student.apu.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ARU-HELO: smtp.cam.apu.ac.uk X-ARU-sender-host: smtp.cam.apu.ac.uk [193.63.55.9]:40821 X-ARU-MailScanner-Info: see http://www.apu.ac.uk/mail-problems X-ARU-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ARU-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5.23, required 6, autolearn=not spam, ARU_FROM_AC_UK -4.00, AWL -0.76, BAYES_00 -2.60, FORGED_RCVD_HELO 0.14, URIBL_SBL 2.00) X-ARU-MailScanner-From: sp373@student.apu.ac.uk X-APU-MailFilter: message scanned X-ARU-MailFilter: message scanned Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re: Re: missing /dev/dsp X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: SP373@student.apu.ac.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:54:08 -0000 kalin mintchev wrote: -----Original Message----- From: "kalin mintchev" To: SP373@student.apu.ac.uk Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:49:06 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Re: missing /dev/dsp > Hi again, > > Please don't try to open your laptop, i have a T30 here out of warranty. > Just call them back, they will not charge you probably. >thanks... it is under warranty. but i really need >it here to work. some >of it needs sound... >i wouldn't really go into the laptop myself - i've >done that in the past >and althuoght it was partially successful i don't >want to go through it >again. if it was a desktop maybe but not with this >laptop... >the problem is that if i deal with them over the >phone the second i >mention that i'm not using windows they turn red and >say 'we are not >supporting your machine then. you have to reimage >(?!?) it'. uhh.. >reimage?!?... ok... For one more time:=20 Are you sure dmesg does not show your sound card, even with a message "(dri= ver not attached)" next to it?? or pciconf -lv showing something similar to: "none1@pci1:0:0:......." ........... and then something like: class =3D multimedia subclass =3D audio if yes you have to send the notebook back to them. Your laptop is under warranty and they accepted it once already. They will = do it again, since after their repair your sound card doesn't work.st >and althuoght it was partially successful i don't >want to go through it >again. if it was a desktop maybe but not with this >laptop... >the problem is that if i deal with them over the >phone the second i >mention that i'm not using windows they turn red and >say 'we are not >supporting your machine From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 21:57:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3644E16A434 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:57:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7C9843D49 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:57:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from broadpark.no ([217.13.4.96]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IT000A982JWC470@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:02:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from [80.202.4.61] (Forwarded-For: [213.187.181.70]) by bgo1mstore1.broadpark.no (mshttpd); Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:57:23 +0100 Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:57:23 +0100 From: Kristian Vaaf To: Giorgos Keramidas Message-id: <2f9700a45c66.43c6ded3@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sun Java(tm) System Messenger Express 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-language: en Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-Accept-Language: en Priority: normal Cc: lars@gmx.at, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: My script to replace strings in ASCII files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:57:16 -0000 You have been very helpful! I am glad people like you exist to educate those who cannot afford education. All the best in the future, Kristian Vaaf ----- Original Message ----- From: Giorgos Keramidas Date: Thursday, January 12, 2006 2:01 pm Subject: Re: My script to replace strings in ASCII files > On 2006-01-11 21:40, lars wrote: > >Kristian Vaaf wrote: > >> Just curious, what do I need to do to be able to execute this > >> script like: > >> > >> $ text-replace old_string new_string > >> > >> I find it a bit inconvenient having to edit the script for > >> every thing I need to replace. > > It is. You should start using $1, $2, ... for options. > > >> #!/usr/local/bin/bash > >> # > >> # Replace old with new inside all text files. > >> # $URBAN: text-replace.sh,v 1.0 2005/10/24 15:09:05 vaaf Exp $ > >> # > >> > >> for file in `find . -type f ! -name ".*"`; do > >> > >> if [ "`file -b "$file" | grep text`" != "" ]; then > >> > >> sed -i '' "s/old/new/g" "$file" > >> > >> echo "$file: Done" > >> > >> fi > >> > >> done > > > > Why not open the file with vim and then > > :.,$s/old/new/ > > Heh, that's nice, and it may even work with multiple files using > vim's -c option in a way similar to sed(1): > > vim -c ':%s/old/new/' file > > > Of course that's not scriptable... > > Using the -c option shown above, it may be scriptable too :) > > > Maybe you should interpolate the first and the second argument > > into your regexes in the substitution with sed, > > so you get "s/argument1/argument2/" > > > > Perl might help though. > > This opens a whole can of worms though. What if the user defined > command-line parameters contain special characters (i.e. single > quote, double quotes, etc.)? > > Instead of having to go through all the hoops of parsing quotes > and other special characters in a shell script, and then invoking > sed on each file, passing one file at a time, I prefer using "in > place editing": > > $ grep emacs .bashrc > export EDITOR='nemacs' > alias emacs='nemacs' > > $ perl -pi -e "s/'nemacs'/'emacs'/g" .bashrc > > $ grep emacs .bashrc > export EDITOR='emacs' > alias emacs='emacs' > > $ perl -pi -e "s/'emacs'/'nemacs'/g" .bashrc > > $ grep emacs .bashrc > export EDITOR='nemacs' > alias emacs='nemacs' > > $ > > The number of files passed as 'extra' arguments to perl in this > case is only limited by the amount of text that can fit in a > single command-line, and if that's not enough you can use > xargs(1) to work around the limit: > > find . -type f -name \*foo\* | xargs perl -pi -e "s/old/new/g" > > So, there's no need to write special shell scripts to do this :) > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 21:58:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFF8C16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:58:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13B0F43D49 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:58:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0CLvxNu001663; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:57:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k0CLvxHG001660; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:57:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:57:59 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: Philip Hallstrom In-Reply-To: <20060112134825.Q53590@wolf.pjkh.com> Message-ID: <20060112225638.J1494@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <20060112134825.Q53590@wolf.pjkh.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to boot from a slice other than "a"? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:58:08 -0000 > Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on > /dev/da0s1a 248M 180M 48M 79% / > /dev/da0s1h 14G 496M 13G 4% /mnt > > /dev/da0s1h has an exact copy of /dev/da0s1a using dump/restore. > > I want to configure things so that the next time I reboot it will > automatically boot from /dev/da0s1h without me having to do anything (since > it's remote I can't interrupt the boot process). > > I know I need to modify fstab on da0s1h. And if I was on the console I'd > interrupt the boot process and type in 0:da(0,h)/boot/loader, but I'm not. are you actually interested of running /boot/loader from partition h or mounting root at /dev/da0s1h if second - add: vfs.root.mountfrom="ufs:da0s1h" if first - i don't know :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 21:59:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B03B416A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:59:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02A2E43D46 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:59:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0CLxWin001790; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:59:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k0CLxWXm001787; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:59:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:59:32 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: Chuck Swiger In-Reply-To: <43C695A8.7050906@mac.com> Message-ID: <20060112225833.O1494@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <20060111112654.O11627@chylonia.3miasto.net> <43C517B7.704@mac.com> <20060112125658.W35216@chylonia.3miasto.net> <43C695A8.7050906@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: limiting Buf memory X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:59:39 -0000 > > Possibly you don't understand your question, either. "Buf" is not a state > which is exclusive: that 110MB of memory is comprised of backing store from > the disk which is in the Active or Inactive states. > > hw.physmem - Wired ~= hw.usermem > Active + Inactive + Cache + Free ~= hw.usermem fortunately, while i (as you state) don't know what i'm asking about, i found the solution, probably because i don't know why it work. but it works anyway kern.maxbcache=bytecount in loader.conf From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 22:01:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF5A016A422 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:01:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: from mail.el.net (mail.el.net [68.165.89.91]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84DCF43D49 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:01:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: (qmail 80736 invoked by uid 1008); 12 Jan 2006 22:02:16 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.el.net) (127.0.0.1) by mail.el.net with SMTP; 12 Jan 2006 22:02:16 -0000 Received: from 24.90.33.115 (SquirrelMail authenticated user kalin@el.net) by mail.el.net with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:02:16 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <59891.24.90.33.115.1137103336.squirrel@mail.el.net> In-Reply-To: <1137102826.1c38bc0SP373@student.apu.ac.uk> References: <1137102826.1c38bc0SP373@student.apu.ac.uk> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:02:16 -0500 (EST) From: "kalin mintchev" To: SP373@student.apu.ac.uk User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed;boundary="----=_20060112170216_26641" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re: Re: missing /dev/dsp X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:01:19 -0000 ------=_20060112170216_26641 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit thanks.... here: # pciconf -lv |grep multimedia # pciconf -lv | grep audio # and the dmesg is attached.... thanks.. > kalin mintchev wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > From: "kalin mintchev" > To: SP373@student.apu.ac.uk > Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:49:06 -0500 (EST) > Subject: Re: Re: missing /dev/dsp > > >> Hi again, >> >> Please don't try to open your laptop, i have a T30 here out of warranty. >> Just call them back, they will not charge you probably. > >>thanks... it is under warranty. but i really need >it here to work. some >>of it needs sound... >>i wouldn't really go into the laptop myself - i've >done that in the past >>and althuoght it was partially successful i don't >want to go through it >>again. if it was a desktop maybe but not with this >laptop... > >>the problem is that if i deal with them over the >phone the second i >>mention that i'm not using windows they turn red and >say 'we are not >>supporting your machine then. you have to reimage >(?!?) it'. uhh.. >>reimage?!?... ok... > > For one more time: > Are you sure dmesg does not show your sound card, even with a message > "(driver not attached)" next to it?? > or pciconf -lv showing something similar to: "none1@pci1:0:0:......." > ........... and then something like: > class = multimedia > subclass = audio > > if yes you have to send the notebook back to them. > Your laptop is under warranty and they accepted it once already. They will > do it again, since after their repair your sound card doesn't work.st >>and althuoght it was partially successful i don't >want to go through it >>again. if it was a desktop maybe but not with this >laptop... > >>the problem is that if i deal with them over the >phone the second i >>mention that i'm not using windows they turn red and >say 'we are not >>supporting your machine > > -- ------=_20060112170216_26641 Content-Type: text/plain; name="dmesg.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="dmesg.txt" Copyright (c) 1992-2005 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1979, 1980, 1983, 1986, 1988, 1989, 1991, 1992, 1993, 1994 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE #0: Mon Aug 15 20:16:14 EDT 2005 root@reterdo.el.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/K01 Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz quality 0 CPU: Mobile Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 - M CPU 2.20GHz (2192.90-MHz 686-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0xf29 Stepping = 9 Features=0xbfebf9ff real memory = 1073152000 (1023 MB) avail memory = 1040596992 (992 MB) npx0: on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface acpi0: on motherboard acpi_ec0: port 0x66,0x62 on acpi0 acpi0: Power Button (fixed) Timecounter "ACPI-fast" frequency 3579545 Hz quality 1000 acpi_timer0: <24-bit timer at 3.579545MHz> port 0x1008-0x100b on acpi0 cpu0: on acpi0 acpi_throttle0: on cpu0 acpi_lid0: on acpi0 acpi_button0: on acpi0 pcib0: port 0xcf8-0xcff on acpi0 pci0: on pcib0 pcib1: at device 1.0 on pci0 pci1: on pcib1 pci1: at device 0.0 (no driver attached) uhci0: port 0x1800-0x181f irq 11 at device 29.0 on pci0 usb0: on uhci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 uhub0: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub0: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci1: port 0x1820-0x183f irq 11 at device 29.1 on pci0 usb1: on uhci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 uhub1: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub1: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered uhci2: port 0x1840-0x185f irq 11 at device 29.2 on pci0 usb2: on uhci2 usb2: USB revision 1.0 uhub2: Intel UHCI root hub, class 9/0, rev 1.00/1.00, addr 1 uhub2: 2 ports with 2 removable, self powered pcib2: at device 30.0 on pci0 pci2: on pcib2 cbb0: mem 0x50000000-0x50000fff irq 11 at device 0.0 on pci2 cardbus0: on cbb0 pccard0: <16-bit PCCard bus> on cbb0 cbb1: mem 0x51000000-0x51000fff irq 11 at device 0.1 on pci2 cardbus1: on cbb1 pccard1: <16-bit PCCard bus> on cbb1 wi0: mem 0xf8000000-0xf8000fff irq 11 at device 2.0 on pci2 wi0: using RF:PRISM2.5 MAC:ISL3874A(Mini-PCI) wi0: Intersil Firmware: Primary (1.1.0), Station (1.4.9) wi0: Ethernet address: 00:05:3c:09:82:a3 wi0: 11b rates: 1Mbps 2Mbps 5.5Mbps 11Mbps fxp0: port 0x7000-0x703f mem 0xd0200000-0xd0200fff irq 11 at device 8.0 on pci2 miibus0: on fxp0 inphy0: on miibus0 inphy0: 10baseT, 10baseT-FDX, 100baseTX, 100baseTX-FDX, auto fxp0: Ethernet address: 00:09:6b:7c:62:f7 isab0: at device 31.0 on pci0 isa0: on isab0 atapci0: port 0x1860-0x186f,0x376,0x170-0x177,0x3f6,0x1f0-0x1f7 at device 31.1 on pci0 ata0: channel #0 on atapci0 ata1: channel #1 on atapci0 pci0: at device 31.3 (no driver attached) acpi_tz0: on acpi0 atkbdc0: port 0x64,0x60 irq 1 on acpi0 atkbd0: irq 1 on atkbdc0 kbd0 at atkbd0 psm0: irq 12 on atkbdc0 psm0: model Generic PS/2 mouse, device ID 0 fdc0: port 0x3f7,0x3f0-0x3f5 irq 6 drq 2 on acpi0 sio0: configured irq 4 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio0: port may not be enabled sio0: <16550A-compatible COM port> port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on acpi0 sio0: type 8250 or not responding ppc0: port 0x3bc-0x3be irq 7 on acpi0 ppc0: Generic chipset (NIBBLE-only) in COMPATIBLE mode ppbus0: on ppc0 plip0: on ppbus0 lpt0: on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port ppi0: on ppbus0 sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled acpi_cmbat0: on acpi0 acpi_acad0: on acpi0 sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled orm0: at iomem 0xdc000-0xdffff,0xd1000-0xd1fff,0xd0000-0xd0fff on isa0 pmtimer0 on isa0 sc0: at flags 0x100 on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x300> sio1: configured irq 3 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 sio1: port may not be enabled vga0: at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 Timecounter "TSC" frequency 2192896992 Hz quality 800 Timecounters tick every 10.000 msec ad0: 57277MB [116374/16/63] at ata0-master UDMA100 acd0: DVDROM at ata1-master PIO4 Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s1a ------=_20060112170216_26641-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 22:02:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10DB116A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:02:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D247F43D45 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:02:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0CM1taV001986 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:01:55 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k0CM1sGI001983 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:01:54 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:01:54 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060112225935.I1494@chylonia.3miasto.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: rescanning DOS partition table X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:02:03 -0000 how to force for a given SCSI-like disk (/dev/da?) to recreate right /dev/da?s? devices based on DOS partition table? it's done well on attach, but how to do this on request? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 22:02:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FB1F16A478 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:02:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: from lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (mail.bathnetworks.com [84.92.24.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 291E643D49 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:02:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: (qmail 21588 invoked by uid 510); 12 Jan 2006 22:05:47 +0000 Received: from 84.92.24.252 by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (envelope-from , uid 508) with qmail-scanner-1.24-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.87/1146. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.24-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-3.8/5.0):. Processed in 1.330043 secs); 12 Jan 2006 22:05:47 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.8 required=5.0 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: bsd@bathnetworks.com via lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.24-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-3.8/5.0):. Processed in 1.330043 secs Process 21581) Received: from mail.bathnetworks.com (HELO ?84.92.24.252?) (bsd@bathnetworks.com@84.92.24.252) by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk with SMTP; 12 Jan 2006 22:05:45 +0000 From: Robert Slade To: Nathan Vidican In-Reply-To: <43C6C7BB.2080808@wmptl.com> References: <43C6C7BB.2080808@wmptl.com> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1137103545.17905.6.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:05:45 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Slightly OT, question about nvidia X driver & screensaver X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:02:20 -0000 On Thu, 2006-01-12 at 21:18, Nathan Vidican wrote: > Have the nvidia driver installed on my laptop, it's running Linux/amd64... I'm a > FreeBSD guy, and relatively new to linux. To be honest, not thrilled at all - > but it works, hardware support for this thing under FreeBSD's just not there > yet. So platform use aside, the problem should be fairly simple and the same fix > on anything using nvidia's driver for x: > > My screen blanks, there are no settings inside of X, inside the > bios/power-management, or in kde, I even went so far as to disable power > management entirely... the screen blanks (like power/screen saver) after a > period of inactivity, really annoying. I havn't timed it, but figure it's at > about 5 minutes. Someone had mentioned in an email on this list before how the > nvidia driver gives them the ability to screensave/powersave a while back while > talking about something else; I only vaguely remember the thread and havn't been > able to find it searching the archives - but was hoping that if someone out > there knows how it does it, perhaps someone else may know how to stop it. > > So anyhow, my question is this: How do I make it stop? I don't want my laptop's > screen to turn off - especially so when it's plugged into a/c power, often I'm > reading an article and it blanks on me - course I can just move the mouse and > things come back, but it is really annoying. Any ideas? Please no RTFM, I'm not > a newbie over here - and I've been reading nvidia's documentation up and down > and can't find anything on the subject (though I did manage to find a few other > cool tweaks). Nathan, According to the Nvidia site the drivers are different. You really should ask your question on the linux list for the distro or even on the x-windows list. Rob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 22:03:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C4C916A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:03:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Received: from mail.scls.lib.wi.us (mail.scls.lib.wi.us [198.150.40.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2159E43D4C for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:03:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Received: from [172.26.2.238] ([172.26.2.238]) by mail.scls.lib.wi.us (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k0CM2xR4089663; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:02:59 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Message-ID: <43C6D212.2010202@scls.lib.wi.us> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 16:02:58 -0600 From: Greg Barniskis User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: fbsd_user@a1poweruser.com References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Martin McCormick , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Strange Failure Mode in FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:03:16 -0000 fbsd_user wrote: > The firewall section of the handbook states that the > rc.firewall file is an example. > You really should read the firewall section of the handbook > and use the working examples contained there. Oh, most definitely yes. I was assuming Martin (the OP) knew this since he clearly had gone to the trouble of writing custom rules, and that the problem was just one of successful integration. I only use the stock rc.firewall for basic testing, training and POC work, otherwise I do something like this: > cp rc.firewall custom.ipfw, edit to your needs and use > firewall_type="/etc/custom.ipfw" And having glanced at the handbook just now, I believe that I flubbed that assertion above, and the proper use is firewall_script="/etc/custom.ipfw" with firewall_type being used to select from within a multi-mode case structure such as rc.firewall has. Sorry, it's been a long while since I actually edited any part of my firewall rules (love that FreeBSD stability ;). -- Greg Barniskis, Computer Systems Integrator South Central Library System (SCLS) Library Interchange Network (LINK) , (608) 266-6348 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 22:07:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA3B116A422 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:07:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from wolf.pjkh.com (wolf.pjkh.com [66.228.196.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D75F43D92 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:07:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wolf.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 433DE1729E; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:07:13 -0800 (PST) Received: from wolf.pjkh.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (wolf.pjkh.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 53481-07; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:07:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by wolf.pjkh.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D7F0517291; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:07:12 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wolf.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D28CA170B1; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:07:12 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:07:12 -0800 (PST) From: Philip Hallstrom To: Wojciech Puchar In-Reply-To: <20060112225638.J1494@chylonia.3miasto.net> Message-ID: <20060112140418.A53786@wolf.pjkh.com> References: <20060112134825.Q53590@wolf.pjkh.com> <20060112225638.J1494@chylonia.3miasto.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at pjkh.com Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to boot from a slice other than "a"? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:07:31 -0000 >> Filesystem Size Used Avail Capacity Mounted on >> /dev/da0s1a 248M 180M 48M 79% / >> /dev/da0s1h 14G 496M 13G 4% /mnt >> >> /dev/da0s1h has an exact copy of /dev/da0s1a using dump/restore. >> >> I want to configure things so that the next time I reboot it will >> automatically boot from /dev/da0s1h without me having to do anything (since >> it's remote I can't interrupt the boot process). >> >> I know I need to modify fstab on da0s1h. And if I was on the console I'd >> interrupt the boot process and type in 0:da(0,h)/boot/loader, but I'm not. > > are you actually interested of running /boot/loader from partition h or > mounting root at /dev/da0s1h Hmm... guess I didn't realize there was a difference :) I want the OS to "run" from /dev/da0s1h so that I can then completely wipe and replace /dev/da0s1a [1]. > if second - add: > > vfs.root.mountfrom="ufs:da0s1h" to which file? Thanks! -philip [1] The box is a new 5.3 install. My thought was to boot from da0s1h, buildworld/kernel for 6 with a DESTDIR pointing to the original / (da0s1a). Then reboot and have a clean install of 6. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 22:16:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42D3816A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:16:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (c-67-168-241-176.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.168.241.176]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E892943D5E for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:16:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from sopwith.solgatos.com (uucp@localhost) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with UUCP id k0CMGZQ21010 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:16:35 -0800 Received: from localhost by sopwith.solgatos.com (8.8.8/6.24) id WAA13869; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:16:38 GMT Message-Id: <200601122216.WAA13869@sopwith.solgatos.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:16:38 +0000 From: Dieter Subject: gcc-4 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:16:45 -0000 Are there any plans to update gcc to gcc-4? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 22:31:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8911316A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:31:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB79543D46 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:31:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0CMVImB001613; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:31:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k0CMVIX7001610; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:31:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:31:18 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: Philip Hallstrom In-Reply-To: <20060112140418.A53786@wolf.pjkh.com> Message-ID: <20060112233046.K1533@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <20060112134825.Q53590@wolf.pjkh.com> <20060112225638.J1494@chylonia.3miasto.net> <20060112140418.A53786@wolf.pjkh.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to boot from a slice other than "a"? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:31:26 -0000 > > Hmm... guess I didn't realize there was a difference :) > > I want the OS to "run" from /dev/da0s1h so that I can then completely wipe > and replace /dev/da0s1a [1]. > >> if second - add: >> >> vfs.root.mountfrom="ufs:da0s1h" > > to which file? loader.conf > > [1] The box is a new 5.3 install. My thought was to boot from da0s1h, > buildworld/kernel for 6 with a DESTDIR pointing to the original / (da0s1a). > Then reboot and have a clean install of 6. no need to do it that way. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 22:35:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA38116A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:35:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberto.nunnari@supsi.ch) Received: from mail3.ticino.com (mail3.ticino.com [195.190.166.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE7643D62 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:35:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from roberto.nunnari@supsi.ch) X-Spam-Score: 1 Received: from [192.168.1.6] (unverified [62.48.103.172]) by mail3.ticino.com (Rockliffe SMTPRA 6.1.22) with ESMTP id ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:35:04 +0100 Message-ID: <43C6D999.2020104@supsi.ch> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:35:05 +0100 From: Roberto Nunnari User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20050915 X-Accept-Language: it-ch, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ceri Davies References: <43C64C52.9020209@supsi.ch> <8E000CF1-7D7E-4E63-8EE5-BB87BF9C44E8@submonkey.net> <43C6670E.5000500@supsi.ch> <20060112143730.GJ28781@submonkey.net> <43C6B637.9050006@supsi.ch> <20060112202917.GL28781@submonkey.net> In-Reply-To: <20060112202917.GL28781@submonkey.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "'freebsd-questions@freebsd.org'" Subject: Re: {Spam?} Re: {Spam?} Re: patches and uname -a X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:35:10 -0000 Ceri Davies wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 09:04:07PM +0100, Roberto Nunnari wrote: > >>I checked the patches (cpio.patch ee.patch texindex5x.patch) and none >>of them tries to change src/sys/conf/newvers.sh nor src/UPDATING > > > There is an ipfw one as well. > > Cheers, > > Ceri Thank you Ceri, but I believe that's only for FreeBSD 6.0 Cheers. -- Robi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 22:55:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ED9416A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:55:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jamesoff@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.207]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8ABB43D46 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:55:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jamesoff@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 9so515070nzo for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:55:52 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=oZflnBXdbCDgfWCGO17QcHss+iBSmKWL4/Fr3bpFj3W1ERuU2w0rtm+J+B3JAfdmnXF/W3TDJaqIs7z/VAEtIcEfyVN4gNKkyU1DrJnWJ8N+3+DXICA8kk+Gr7UYAg8DZ86qekQML7086Nky2o6sQtJf1gZu5Z7iADXoCQSjbpg= Received: by 10.36.101.3 with SMTP id y3mr2190830nzb; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:55:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.106.2 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:55:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <720051dc0601121455h76e2732u55f686f077f875e@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:55:52 +0000 From: James Seward To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <720051dc0601090604p638f6772g535f68c1574e3f1c@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <720051dc0601090604p638f6772g535f68c1574e3f1c@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: 6-STABLE/amd64 recent kernel can't see any ata disks X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:55:57 -0000 With apologies for the delay (due to external influences and problems like finding my serial cable), here is the output of boot -v on a newer kernel (compiled Monday morning from a cvsup on Sunday if memory serves). http://sakaki.jamesoff.net/~james/dmesg-broken.txt If anyone has any suggestions of things to try or to check I'd be most grateful; should I just go ahead and file a PR for this? Thanks, James From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 23:25:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 430CF16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:25:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from h.nieser@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr9.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr9.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.29]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFD2243D46 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:25:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from h.nieser@xs4all.nl) Received: from [192.168.1.10] (nieser.net [194.109.160.131]) by smtp-vbr9.xs4all.nl (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k0CNPADn023311 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 00:25:10 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from h.nieser@xs4all.nl) Message-ID: <43C6E55A.8020500@xs4all.nl> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 00:25:14 +0100 From: Hans Nieser User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051208) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Subject: Remote backups, reading from and writing to the same file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:25:12 -0000 Hi list, For a while I have been doing remote backups from my little server at home (which hosts some personal websites and also serves as my testing webserver) by tarring everything I wanted to be backed up and piping it to another machine on my network with nc(1), for example: On the recieving machine: nc -l 10000 > backup-`date +%Y-%m-%d`.tar.gz On my server: tar -c -z --exclude /mnt* -f - / | nc -w 5 -o aphax 10000 (Some excludes for tar(1) are left out for simplicity's sake) Among the things being backed up are my mysql database tables. This made me wonder wether the backup could possibly get borked when mysql writes to any of the mysql tables while tar is reading from them. Do I really have to use MySQL's tools to do a proper SQL dump or stop MySQL (and any other services that may write to files included in my backup) before doing a backup? Do any of the more involved remote-backup solutions have ways of working around this? Or is it simply not possible to write to a file while it is being read? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 23:33:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B203C16A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:33:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEE1B43D64 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:32:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from default.chvlva.adelphia.net ([68.67.248.200]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060112233254.TUEL14388.mta9.adelphia.net@default.chvlva.adelphia.net> for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:32:54 -0500 Received: by default.chvlva.adelphia.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 82ECEB650; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:32:39 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:32:39 -0500 From: Parv To: f-q Message-ID: <20060112233239.GA97879@holestein.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: f-q Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Need of '/compat/linux' X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:33:09 -0000 I am running 6-STABLE from Dec 27 2005; mortal user shell is zsh 4.2.6; root shell is bash [23]; have reinstalled all the ports that i currently want/need. Short story is that without pointing '/compat/linux' to '/usr/linux-base', i could not run acroread7, instead got the following message ... ELF interpreter /lib/ld-linux.so.2 not found Long version ... I started from almost clean slate by installing gimp2 (which installed obscene amount of dependencies, including gtk2, pango, atk). Then after installing some more ports, i set LINUXBASE to '/usr/linux-base' in '/etc/make.conf' (there was no link from '/compat/linux' to that directory); later installed 'emulators/linux_base-8' port, followed by 'print/acroread7'. After getting the following message while trying to run 'acroread7', i got ... ELF interpreter /lib/ld-linux.so.2 not found Mounting 'linprocfs' or running (FreeBSD) 'ldconfig -m /usr/linux-base' did not help. I searched for Linux version of 'ldconfig' in '/usr/linux-base/bin' (forgot to look in '/usr/linux-base/sbin' at the time). Besides, '/usr/linux-base/sbin/ldconfig' does not seem to have an option (like FreeBSD 'ldconfig -r') to see the search directories or libraries found. I checked 'LINUXBASE' in '/etc/make.conf' and in a port directory by 'make -V LINUXBASE', both indicated the same value. Only after creating a symlink to '/usr/linux-base' from '/compat/linux' i could run acroread7, which resulted in a more promising error message (which is another story). So, my question is how do i remove the symlink from '/compat/linux' & still have acroread7 (or any other linux software) run? Why is setting 'LINUXBASE' is not enough for acroread7 to find the needed libraries? - Parv -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 23:35:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6569316A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:35:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc14.comcast.net [216.148.227.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B9BB43D49 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:35:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-24-118-173-219.hsd1.mn.comcast.net[24.118.173.219]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc14) with ESMTP id <200601122335140140026o4pe>; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:35:14 +0000 From: Josh Paetzel To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:35:13 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200601121735.13600.josh@tcbug.org> Cc: Subject: VIA 6420 SATA150 controller RAID questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:35:15 -0000 I'm considering installing FBSD 6.0-R onto a pair of SATA drives in RAID 1 on a Via 6420 SATA150 RAID controller. (I realize it's software RAID but better than nothing. :) Has anyone done this and had issues? I did a quick google/mailing list search and didn't see anything relevent. -- Thanks, Josh Paetzel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 23:37:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A12216A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:37:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drakyri@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com (bay102-f36.bay102.hotmail.com [64.4.61.46]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 625BE43D46 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:37:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drakyri@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:37:28 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 64.4.61.200 by by102fd.bay102.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:37:27 GMT X-Originating-IP: [66.7.35.250] X-Originating-Email: [drakyri@hotmail.com] X-Sender: drakyri@hotmail.com From: "Michael Zimmer" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:37:27 +0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 12 Jan 2006 23:37:28.0098 (UTC) FILETIME=[26126020:01C617D1] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: defaultroute not loading X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:37:28 -0000 I just updated a i386 gateway to 6.0-STABLE - using my backed-up versions [from 5.1] of: rc.conf rc.firewall rc.resume rc.sendmail rc.shutdown rc.subr rc.suspend resolv.conf sysctl.conf ipnat.rules ipf.rules ...and the default route won't load on boot, although it is specified in rc.conf (replace all non-comment #'s and 1.2.3.4 with appropriate numbers....) hostname="#####.com" defaultrouter=1.2.3.4 # previously "1.2.3.4"; removed upon suggestion to no effect icmp_bmcastecho="YES" gateway_enable="YES" inetd_enable="YES" kern_securelevel_enable="NO" linux_enable="YES" moused_enable="YES" sendmail_enable="NO" sshd_enable="YES" usbd_enable="YES" firewall_enable="YES" firewall_type="UNKNOWN" pccard_beep=0 keybell="NO" ipfilter_enable="YES" ipfilter_flags="" ipnat_enable="YES" ipnat_rules="/etc/ipnat.rules" ifconfig_rl0="inet #.#.#.# netmask 255.255.255.224" ifconfig_xl0="inet 192.168.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.224" ------- I can manually add the route (route add default 1.2.3.4) upon boot, but this isn't a practical long-term solution, since I won't always be around to manage this gateway. If anyone has any input I'd appreciate it. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 23:37:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F00F016A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:37:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from wolf.pjkh.com (wolf.pjkh.com [66.228.196.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C35343D49 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:37:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@philip.pjkh.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wolf.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF35E172D3; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:37:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from wolf.pjkh.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (wolf.pjkh.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 54003-06; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:37:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by wolf.pjkh.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 69097172A7; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:37:53 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wolf.pjkh.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 647F9172A5; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:37:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:37:53 -0800 (PST) From: Philip Hallstrom To: Hans Nieser In-Reply-To: <43C6E55A.8020500@xs4all.nl> Message-ID: <20060112153427.S54310@wolf.pjkh.com> References: <43C6E55A.8020500@xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at pjkh.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Remote backups, reading from and writing to the same file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:37:59 -0000 > For a while I have been doing remote backups from my little server at home > (which hosts some personal websites and also serves as my testing webserver) > by tarring everything I wanted to be backed up and piping it to another > machine on my network with nc(1), for example: > > On the recieving machine: nc -l 10000 > backup-`date +%Y-%m-%d`.tar.gz > > On my server: tar -c -z --exclude /mnt* -f - / | nc -w 5 -o aphax 10000 > > (Some excludes for tar(1) are left out for simplicity's sake) > > Among the things being backed up are my mysql database tables. This made me > wonder wether the backup could possibly get borked when mysql writes to any > of the mysql tables while tar is reading from them. > > Do I really have to use MySQL's tools to do a proper SQL dump or stop MySQL > (and any other services that may write to files included in my backup) before > doing a backup? Do any of the more involved remote-backup solutions have ways > of working around this? Or is it simply not possible to write to a file while > it is being read? The short answer is yes. The medium answer is I would if I were you :-) The long answer (at least to the extent I know it) is... You might be able to take a snapshot of the filesystem mysql's files are on and back those up as they'd be consistent to themselves. But everything I've read about backing up a database suggests that doing a proper backup is the way to go. If you really don't want to do that you might also be able to use one of the various LOCK commands in Mysql to block all writes until you've copied them over. But really a mysqldump ... | gzip > file should result in a very very small file. And you could pipe that over the network (or even start mysqldump on your backup machine) if you didn't want the temp file issue. You might also consider rsync. That would only copy files that have changed. Might be handy if bandwidth is an issue. You can set it up to keep backup copies of files that have changed as well. And it can run over ssh. -philip From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 12 23:39:52 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C797016A41F for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:39:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from budojeepr@yahoo.com) Received: from web31011.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web31011.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.201.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5234443D48 for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:39:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from budojeepr@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 98196 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Jan 2006 23:39:48 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=eXFRME2sMIOoATX3pII6+he6j1v0XtN0Iu7lJOGeaQnTvMTlg8O6Wi51DKIt31Sc/miy8Eg2XiKoe/Wp//ZcocPhjjHKwAfF8VUYxcpApBYuVBMpK/d5wWhFuHqYRC7KNCOJkR+BFLrnHlf1zyErj8g/WK+YDNVXLPG4ZPJ/cSs= ; Message-ID: <20060112233948.98194.qmail@web31011.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [209.76.69.106] by web31011.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:39:48 PST Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:39:48 -0800 (PST) From: Brad Marsh To: tinguely@casselton.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Help with panic: vm_fault X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:39:52 -0000 Thanks for the help...I booted the GENERIC kernel, and it allowed me to log in as root, but as soon as I started to to anything (I think I did "cd") it panicked. I'm going to run the memtest86 and see if it says anything. If you think it would be useful, I could do more debugging on the new vmcore file. Thanks again! --- Brad Marsh wrote: > Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:58:23 -0800 (PST) > From: Brad Marsh > Subject: Re: Help with panic: vm_fault > To: Mark Tinguely > > > Does the Mainboard say that it can handle this amount > > of RAM? > > The manual for the motherboard says I can use up to two 1GB modules. > > (And I used to have two 256MB modules, so I know it can handle two at > a > time. Also, right now I'm using one 512 and one 256.) > > > Do you have 2 video cards, for example a built into the > > mainboard but disabled? > > Just the built-in video adapter. > > > Is this a GENERIC kernel or has it been modified? I see > > the compile directory is DEBUG, so I am guessing it > > could be a custom kernel. > > Yeah, I customized it first thing. Then after all this trouble I > built > a debug kernel and put the two modules in again so I'd have the debug > info. > > > > #17 0xc062b6bf in Xint0x80_syscall () at > > > ../../../i386/i386/exception.s:200 > > > #18 0x00000033 in ?? () > > > Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?) > > > (kgdb) q > > > > Level 17 is wrong, because that is not a caller of > > pmap_change_wiring(). > > Maybe the stack frame got corrupted and the strange VA > > is another side effect of the corruption. > > > ...if this is not a GENERIC kernel, could you try > > boo[t]ing say the install CD to eliminate > > options in the kernel? > > Great idea. I kept the original GENERIC kernel around just for this > purpose. Back in a while... > > Thanks! > > P.S. I've been working toward testing with memtest86, but this > machine > doesn't have a floppy, the USB floppy isn't working (strangely enough > - > it used to), and I don't have any CDs at this office that the burner > can use! I'm having a lovely day. :^) __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 00:16:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 511EF16A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 00:16:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from siegfried.pietralla@eds.com) Received: from symler2.mail.eds.com (symler2.mail.eds.com [207.169.189.142]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F06C43D4C for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 00:16:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from siegfried.pietralla@eds.com) Received: from symlir1.mail.eds.com (symlir1.mail.eds.com [192.85.216.71]) by symler2.mail.eds.com (8.13.4/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k0D0G2g7003639; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:16:03 +1100 Received: from symlir1.mail.eds.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by symlir1.mail.eds.com (8.13.4/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k0D0F42J003043; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:15:04 +1100 Received: from aubwm050.apac.corp.eds.com ([134.251.159.12]) by symlir1.mail.eds.com (8.13.4/8.12.10) with ESMTP id k0D0F4nj003038; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:15:04 +1100 Received: from aubwm010.apac.corp.eds.com ([134.251.166.96]) by aubwm050.apac.corp.eds.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:15:05 +1100 Received: from aumem201.apac.corp.eds.com ([134.251.130.70]) by aubwm010.apac.corp.eds.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.211); Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:15:04 +1100 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.7226.0 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:15:02 +1100 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Remote backups, reading from and writing to the same file Thread-Index: AcYXz78lHmBN5rktR7OARU1Xt7rnFQAAZQKg From: "Pietralla, Siegfried P" To: "Hans Nieser" , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jan 2006 00:15:04.0271 (UTC) FILETIME=[66DB0DF0:01C617D6] Cc: Subject: RE: Remote backups, reading from and writing to the same file X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 00:16:08 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Hans Nieser > Sent: Friday, 13 January 2006 10:25 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Remote backups, reading from and writing to the same file >=20 > Hi list, >=20 > For a while I have been doing remote backups from my little server at home=20 > (which hosts some personal websites and also serves as my testing=20 > webserver) by tarring everything I wanted to be backed up and piping it to=20 > another machine on my network with nc(1), for example: >=20 > On the recieving machine: nc -l 10000 > backup-`date +%Y-%m-%d`.tar.gz >=20 > On my server: tar -c -z --exclude /mnt* -f - / | nc -w 5 -o aphax 10000 >=20 > (Some excludes for tar(1) are left out for simplicity's sake) >=20 > Among the things being backed up are my mysql database tables. This made=20 > me wonder wether the backup could possibly get borked when mysql writes to=20 > any of the mysql tables while tar is reading from them. >=20 > Do I really have to use MySQL's tools to do a proper SQL dump or stop=20 > MySQL (and any other services that may write to files included in my=20 > backup) before doing a backup? Do any of the more involved remote-backup=20 > solutions have ways of working around this? Or is it simply not possible=20 > to write to a file while it is being read? hi hans, just some points to note in a general unix / db way ( not freebsd or mysql specific ) : tar ( and unix in general ) doesn't care if you're writing while you're reading, so the tar will 'work' - though I believe tar may get confused if you create new files while tar is running.=20 just copying a 'live' db file will generally not give you a recoverable backup. e.g. with 'oracle' you need to put files into backup mode before copying them which lets oracle maintain extra recovery information. with 'ingres' you use the ingres backup command which records before images along with the database files ( and incidentally prevents table creation ( i.e. new files ) while it backs up the db - usually with tar! ). so you really need to find out what 'hot' backup is supported by your db and run accordingly. or just shut down your db's before running your backups. a common way to manage database backups ( if you have the space ) is to use normal db backup methods to backup to local disk, then use the remote backup to backup the db backup ( and exclude the live db files since they're probably not usable anyway ). the number one rule for ALL backup regimes is - TEST YOUR RECOVERY METHOD - preferably regularly. a real recovery is not the time to find out what the shortcomings in your backup methodology are. regards, siegfried. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 01:11:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95DDB16A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 01:11:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from james_mapson@umpquanet.com) Received: from ns.museum.rain.com (gw-ipinc.museum.rain.com [65.75.192.74]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CD7943D46 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 01:11:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from james_mapson@umpquanet.com) Received: from ns.museum.rain.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns.museum.rain.com (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0D1BOAp007789 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:11:25 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from james@umpquanet.com) Received: (from james@localhost) by ns.museum.rain.com (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k0D1BOGW007788; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:11:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from james) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 17:11:24 -0800 From: James Long To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060113011124.GA7742@ns.museum.rain.com> References: <20060112220016.DA6F616A41F@hub.freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060112220016.DA6F616A41F@hub.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-100.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, J_CHICKENPOX_28,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=failed version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on ns.museum.rain.com Cc: Martin McCormick Subject: Re: Strange Failure Mode in FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 01:11:40 -0000 > Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:58:09 -0600 > From: Martin McCormick > Subject: Re: Strange Failure Mode in FreeBSD 4.11 > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <200601121958.k0CJw9hn091722@dc.cis.okstate.edu> > > In the rc.conf.local, I have: > > firewall_enable="YES" # Set to YES to enable firewall functionality > firewall_script="/etc/rc.firewall" > firewall_type="OPEN" # Firewall type (see /etc/rc.firewall) > firewall_quiet="NO" # Set to YES to suppress rule display > firewall_logging="YES" # Set to YES to enable events logging > firewall_flags="" # Flags passed to ipfw when type is a file > > That makes ipfw load the rules in rc.firewall just fine. In > rc.firewall, there is a place where one can include a table of local > rules and that's where I am doing something wrong. The place in > rc.firewall reads: > > # filename - will load the rules in the given filename (full path required) > > So, I have tried various forms of > > filename /etc/firewall_rules.ns > > and even > > filename - /etc/firewall_rules.ns snip > What do I need to put in /etc/rc.firewall so it just includes > /etc/firewall_rules.ns like the #include directive usually does? You need to put firewall_type="/etc/firewall_rules.ns" in /etc/rc.conf. If that file is readable, it will be passed to ipfw, as per these lines in rc.firewall: *) if [ -r "${firewall_type}" ]; then ${fwcmd} ${firewall_flags} ${firewall_type} fi ;; > Many thanks. An equal but opposite number of welcomes. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 02:26:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F9E916A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 02:26:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF20443D46 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 02:26:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from default.chvlva.adelphia.net ([68.67.248.200]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060113022653.IWKT14388.mta9.adelphia.net@default.chvlva.adelphia.net>; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:26:53 -0500 Received: by default.chvlva.adelphia.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 55C86B650; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:26:48 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:26:48 -0500 From: Parv To: Anirban Adhikary Message-ID: <20060113022648.GA98596@holestein.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: Anirban Adhikary , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <71c73b070601120228y6ba83090jd47f2dae3a06e1ed@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <71c73b070601120228y6ba83090jd47f2dae3a06e1ed@mail.gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: How to access of linux and windows XP desktop simaltaneously X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: f-q List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 02:26:56 -0000 in message <71c73b070601120228y6ba83090jd47f2dae3a06e1ed@mail.gmail.com>, wrote Anirban Adhikary thusly... > > Presently my os is Windows-XP.But i want to have the entire linux > desktop along with my present desktop.I am connected with an > existing network.Presently i get the LINUX server access with > PUTTY software. I cant use telnet or SSH type utilities.But I want > that I have the windows and linux destop simaltaneously.How can i > do this? Install Linux, rather FreeBSD (this being, well, a FreeBSD mailing list), on a machine separate from the Windows one. Connect the two via a switch. Run Humming Bird Exceed, VNC, or some such software -- which will show the "desktop" of your newly acquired FreeBSD machine running X11 -- on your Windows machine. And you have both Windows & FreeBSD graphical interfaces available to you. Do not forget to guard your internal network from the rest of the Internet via a firewall or by virtue of being not connected to the Internet. - Parv -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 02:30:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70C2416A423 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 02:30:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from rwcrmhc12.comcast.net (rwcrmhc14.comcast.net [216.148.227.154]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8564043D49 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 02:29:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from josh@tcbug.org) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (c-24-118-173-219.hsd1.mn.comcast.net[24.118.173.219]) by comcast.net (rwcrmhc14) with ESMTP id <200601130229570140026atpe>; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 02:29:58 +0000 From: Josh Paetzel To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:29:56 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.3 References: <200601121735.13600.josh@tcbug.org> In-Reply-To: <200601121735.13600.josh@tcbug.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200601122029.57033.josh@tcbug.org> Subject: Re: VIA 6420 SATA150 controller RAID questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 02:30:00 -0000 On Thursday 12 January 2006 05:35 pm, Josh Paetzel wrote: > I'm considering installing FBSD 6.0-R onto a pair of SATA drives in > RAID 1 on a Via 6420 SATA150 RAID controller. (I realize it's > software RAID but better than nothing. :) Has anyone done this and > had issues? > > I did a quick google/mailing list search and didn't see anything > relevent. Sorry...I was in a hurry when I sent this. To clarify I am looking for feedback from people that have used this particular VIA controller in FBSD (preferably 6.0) whether in RAID or as regular controllers. -- Thanks, Josh Paetzel From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 02:34:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EB0A16A420 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 02:34:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7613743D46 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 02:34:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from default.chvlva.adelphia.net ([68.67.248.200]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060113023434.JKSL14388.mta9.adelphia.net@default.chvlva.adelphia.net>; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:34:34 -0500 Received: by default.chvlva.adelphia.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3E2E4B650; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:34:35 -0500 (EST) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:34:35 -0500 From: Parv To: Dieter Message-ID: <20060113023435.GB98596@holestein.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: Dieter , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <200601122216.WAA13869@sopwith.solgatos.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200601122216.WAA13869@sopwith.solgatos.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gcc-4 ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 02:34:36 -0000 in message <200601122216.WAA13869@sopwith.solgatos.com>, wrote Dieter thusly... > > Are there any plans to update gcc to gcc-4? Perhaps in 8.0? There are already gcc4[0-2] ports in /usr/ports/lang if you want to have gcc 4 right now. - Parv -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 02:54:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CD2D16A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 02:54:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brent@academy.netmojo.ca) Received: from academy.netmojo.ca (academy.pims.math.ca [198.161.29.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10D0943D46 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 02:54:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brent@academy.netmojo.ca) Received: by academy.netmojo.ca (Postfix, from userid 500) id 862142126D; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:56:15 -0700 (MST) Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:56:15 -0700 From: Brent Kearney To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060113025614.GA5073@kearneys.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Subject: apache2.0.55 w/ mod_ldap & tls X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 02:54:48 -0000 Hello, I'm having some trouble getting apache's ldap module to connect to my openldap server using TLS. The reason it won't initiate an SSL connection is evident in the logs: [Thu Jan 12 20:45:49 2006] [debug] util_ldap.c(1341): LDAP: SSL trusted certificate authority file type - BASE64_FILE [Thu Jan 12 20:45:49 2006] [notice] SIGHUP received. Attempting to restart [Thu Jan 12 20:45:50 2006] [debug] util_ldap.c(1341): LDAP: SSL trusted certificate authority file type - BASE64_FILE [Thu Jan 12 20:45:51 2006] [notice] Digest: generating secret for digest authentication ... [Thu Jan 12 20:45:51 2006] [notice] Digest: done [Thu Jan 12 20:45:51 2006] [notice] LDAP: Built with OpenLDAP LDAP SDK [Thu Jan 12 20:45:51 2006] [notice] LDAP: SSL support unavailable [Thu Jan 12 20:45:51 2006] [notice] Apache/2.0.55 (FreeBSD) mod_ssl/2.0.55 OpenSSL/0.9.7e DAV/2 PHP/5.1.1 configured -- resuming normal operations I found this bug report, which details what looks like the same problem: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/86416 However, it also mentions that the bug was supposed to be fixed in Apache 2.0.55, which I'm running. As in that bug report, I am also using FreeBSD 5.4. I added "LDAPTrustedCAType BASE64_FILE" to my httpd.conf file as suggested, but it makes no difference. Ironically, it was working before I upgraded from apache 2.0.54. Any suggestions are welcome. Thanks, Brent From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 03:03:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6D0416A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 03:03:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from ext-gw.lemis.com (ext-gw.lemis.com [150.101.14.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1003C43D46 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 03:03:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from grog@lemis.com) Received: from wantadilla.lemis.com (wantadilla.lemis.com [192.109.197.135]) by ext-gw.lemis.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B87131DFD; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:33:15 +1030 (CST) Received: by wantadilla.lemis.com (Postfix, from userid 1004) id 7C00E85C2A; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:33:15 +1030 (CST) Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:33:15 +1030 From: Greg 'groggy' Lehey To: Anirban Adhikary , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060113030315.GD73071@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <71c73b070601120228y6ba83090jd47f2dae3a06e1ed@mail.gmail.com> <20060113022648.GA98596@holestein.holy.cow> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="HIPflPGvV5kKjZ73" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060113022648.GA98596@holestein.holy.cow> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Organization: The FreeBSD Project Phone: +61-8-8388-8286 Fax: +61-8-8388-8725 Mobile: +61-418-838-708 VoIP: sip:0871270137@sip.internode.on.net WWW-Home-Page: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ X-PGP-Fingerprint: 9A1B 8202 BCCE B846 F92F 09AC 22E6 F290 507A 4223 Cc: Subject: Re: How to access of linux and windows XP desktop simaltaneously X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 03:03:18 -0000 --HIPflPGvV5kKjZ73 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday, 12 January 2006 at 21:26:48 -0500, Parv wrote: > in message > <71c73b070601120228y6ba83090jd47f2dae3a06e1ed@mail.gmail.com>, wrote > Anirban Adhikary thusly... >> >> Presently my os is Windows-XP.But i want to have the entire linux >> desktop along with my present desktop.I am connected with an >> existing network.Presently i get the LINUX server access with >> PUTTY software. I cant use telnet or SSH type utilities.But I want >> that I have the windows and linux destop simaltaneously.How can i >> do this? > > Install Linux, rather FreeBSD (this being, well, a FreeBSD mailing > list), on a machine separate from the Windows one. Connect the two > via a switch. Run Humming Bird Exceed, VNC, or some such software > -- which will show the "desktop" of your newly acquired FreeBSD > machine running X11 -- on your Windows machine. And you have both > Windows & FreeBSD graphical interfaces available to you. Alternatively, install the rdesktop port on your FreeBSD box and use it to display the Microsoft desktop. This has the advantage of being more comfortable and also being free. > Do not forget to guard your internal network from the rest of the > Internet via a firewall or by virtue of being not connected to the > Internet. I'd strongly recommend firewalling off the Microsoft box altogether and only allow it to access the Internet via your FreeBSD box. Greg -- See complete headers for address and phone numbers. --HIPflPGvV5kKjZ73 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDxxhzIubykFB6QiMRAsW5AJ9iIMTukAendooSXW+Q4DqcvBabgQCbB8ZC HX9ZyAvVzy9lYUbFDCb8VEs= =BfmX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --HIPflPGvV5kKjZ73-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 04:51:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF7D916A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 04:50:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tuxgirl@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D9F743D46 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 04:50:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tuxgirl@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 71so590587wri for ; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:50:58 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=mEdGudCy2T/bj7cjOwtlsUFBeLdlyvqiJFPWytGDHwlxEOGHH69mmUcncetyJ/uc1i7TQkkF5dlk2vwEQEwe/4pRVCwcSEeTuYVx+Z36jFCEBWEUCM0WO34yjou2pQBMx2/rUQbJqLIeD36u2qYy9TF7TceWf2A7Q4XEFI5imp8= Received: by 10.65.251.9 with SMTP id d9mr1729182qbs; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:50:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.194.16 with HTTP; Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:50:58 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6e4453640601122050k445515bdtbf2940e8b399284f@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:50:58 -0700 From: TuxGirl To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Cc: Subject: portupgrade and portversion seg-fault in freebsd 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 04:51:00 -0000 Background: The problem started while i was trying to install evince on my machine. The makefile told me to run gnomelogalyzer.sh to find the problem, and that script didn't see whatever problem was preventing the make, so it said to try a few things (most of which I'd already done), and then to run 'portupgrade -u'. portupgrade -u seg-faulted, and since then portupgrade and portversion have seg-faulted every time I've tried to run them. Here is the output I'm getting: [amon-re /root] portupgrade -aP [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 320 packages found (-1 +0) (...)/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:466: [BUG] Segmentation fault ruby 1.8.2 (2004-12-25) [i386-freebsd6] zsh: abort (core dumped) portupgrade -aP [amon-re /root] [amon-re /root] portversion -v | grep -v =3D [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 320 packages found (-1 +0) (...)/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:466: [BUG] Segmentation fault ruby 1.8.2 (2004-12-25) [i386-freebsd6] zsh: abort (core dumped) portversion -v | zsh: exit 1 grep -v =3D [amon-re /root] I googled, and came across the following page: http://www.freshports.org/sysutils/portupgrade/ However, after I attempted fixing it by changing the values of PORTS_DEDRIVER (using 'export PORTS_DEDRIVER=3Ddbm_hash', etc), I noticed that according to this page, the problem only affects versions of freebsd up to 5.3, but I'm using 6.0. If I include "RELEASE-6.0" in my google query, I don't find anything useful. I tried debugging this over IRC with the president of the local bsd users group, but he couldn't see anything immediately wrong. I'll include the output of the commands he had me run. (This was after running portsdb -Fu and portsdb -Uu): [amon-re /root] portversion -v portupgrade [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 320 packages found (-1 +0) (...)/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:466: [BUG] Segmentation fault ruby 1.8.2 (2004-12-25) [i386-freebsd6] zsh: abort (core dumped) portversion -v portupgrade [amon-re /root] portversion -vR portupgrade [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 320 packages found (-1 +0) (...)/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:466: [BUG] Segmentation fault ruby 1.8.2 (2004-12-25) [i386-freebsd6] zsh: abort (core dumped) portversion -vR portupgrade [amon-re /root] for i in portupgrade ruby ruby18-bdb1; do pkg_info -Ix $i; = done portupgrade-2.0.1_1,1 FreeBSD ports/packages administration and management tool s ruby-1.8.2_5,1 An object-oriented interpreted scripting language ruby18-bdb4-0.5.7 Ruby interface to Sleepycat's Berkeley DB revision 2 or= lat pkg_info: no packages match pattern(s) [amon-re /root] uname -sr FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE I'd appreciate any ideas to resolve this problem. Thanks, ~TuxGirl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 05:30:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7257716A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 05:30:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from mta11.adelphia.net (mta11.adelphia.net [68.168.78.205]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA2543D46 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 05:29:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from default.chvlva.adelphia.net ([68.67.248.200]) by mta11.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060113052959.LBGL5278.mta11.adelphia.net@default.chvlva.adelphia.net> for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 00:29:59 -0500 Received: by default.chvlva.adelphia.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3CF64B564; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 00:29:59 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 00:29:59 -0500 From: Parv To: f-q Message-ID: <20060113052959.GA15340@holestein.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: f-q Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Subject: Syntax of dhclient.conf(5) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 05:30:00 -0000 I failed to find detailed syntax layout in dhclient.conf(5) man page, via web search, or be able to deduce from files in /misc/src/sbin/dhclient. I was looking for something like as given in (i)pf.conf(5) man pages. Could somebody point me to a detailed document documenting the syntax? Alternatively, please help me understand what am i missing from the dhclient.conf listed below which results in following parsing error messages ... /etc/dhclient.conf line 11: expecting identifier after option keyword. { ^ /etc/dhclient.conf line 18: expecting a statement. } ^ /etc/dhclient.conf line 32: semicolon expected. ^ ... dhclient.conf ... 1 2 # FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE's dhclient empties /etc/resolv.conf & default route is 3 # not being assigned. Remedy this by having sane entries here in dhclient.conf. 4 5 request subnet-mask , routers , domain-name-servers; 6 require routers , domain-name-servers; 7 8 interface "em0" 9 { 10 default 11 { 12 fixed-address 192.168.2.100 13 , option subnet-mask 0xffffff00 14 , option routers 192.168.2.1 15 } 16 17 media "media 100baseTX mediaopt full-duplex" , "autoselect"; 18 }; 19 20 #interface "iwi0" 21 #{ 22 # default 23 # { 24 # fixed-address 192.168.2.100 25 # , option subnet-mask 0xffffff00 26 # , option routers 192.168.2.1 27 # } 28 # 29 # medium "mediaopt full-duplex"; 30 #} 31 - Parv -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 06:47:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20EDB16A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 06:47:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from speechpro.com (speech-tech-2.ip.PeterStar.net [81.3.190.130]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 925C943D46 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 06:47:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igorr@speechpro.com) Received: from sysadm.stc ([192.168.2.26]) by s1.stc with esmtp (Exim 4.53 (FreeBSD)) id 1ExIiX-0000OT-85 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:47:21 +0300 Received: from localhost.stc ([127.0.0.1] helo=sysadm.stc) by sysadm.stc with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1ExIi4-000Hdg-1K for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:46:52 +0300 Received: (from igorr@localhost) by sysadm.stc (8.13.4/8.13.3/Submit) id k0D6kpam067807 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:46:51 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from igorr) Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:46:51 +0300 From: Igor Robul To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060113064651.GC67625@sysadm.stc> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 X-Archived: Yes Subject: Re: defaultroute not loading X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 06:47:23 -0000 On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 11:37:27PM +0000, Michael Zimmer wrote: > rc.subr Why? > > hostname="#####.com" > defaultrouter=1.2.3.4 # previously "1.2.3.4"; removed You need "1.2.3.4", because in manual page for rc.conf it is marked as (str). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 07:08:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F09716A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 07:08:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F9F543D46 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 07:08:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from on@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k0D78896001538 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:08:08 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.13.1/8.12.11) id k0D788M8081131; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:08:08 +0700 (ICT) Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:08:08 +0700 (ICT) Message-Id: <200601130708.k0D788M8081131@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th> From: Olivier Nicole To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Virus-Scanned: on CSIM by amavisd-milter (http://www.amavis.org/) Subject: Courier-imap and NIS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 07:08:19 -0000 Hi, I want to set-up a simple courier-imap server that can authenticate with plain passwords from NIS. I installed courier-imap from the ports, but authentication of the style 1 login "name" "password" is refused each time: * BYE Temporary problem, please try again later An by the way, where/how to tell courier-imap that it should look for the mailboxes in a directory different from /var/mail? TIA Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 07:08:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6030916A431 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 07:08:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsdlists@sbcglobal.net) Received: from smtp111.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com (smtp111.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.198.210]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0A23643D67 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 07:08:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsdlists@sbcglobal.net) Received: (qmail 94288 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2006 07:08:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?127.0.0.1?) (calartstech@sbcglobal.net@68.123.227.253 with plain) by smtp111.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 13 Jan 2006 07:08:31 -0000 Message-ID: <43C751DF.3010106@sbcglobal.net> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 23:08:15 -0800 From: Jose Borquez User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions group Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: SIOCFRENB: Invalid argument when attempt to stop Ipfirewall X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 07:08:34 -0000 I am attempting to stop Ipfirewall using ipf -D, but I keep getting the following error: SIOCFRENB: Invalid argument Could anyone give me a clue as to what the problem is? Thanks in advance, Jose From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 08:58:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC7B16A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 08:58:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbq@malleus.ch) Received: from mail.webbuild.ch (aeon.webbuild.ch [81.221.250.115]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C147D43D45 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 08:58:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbq@malleus.ch) Received: (qmail 96428 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2006 09:58:38 +0100 Received: from zux183-149.adsl.green.ch (HELO scorpion) (80.254.183.149) by mail.webbuild.ch with SMTP; 13 Jan 2006 09:58:38 +0100 Received: by scorpion (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:58:38 +0100 Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:58:38 +0100 From: Adrian Schlegel To: FreeBSD questions Message-ID: <20060113085838.GS10690@scorpion.malleus.ch> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Subject: apache20 with mod_ssl segfaults X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 08:58:41 -0000 Hi, After (re)installing apache-2.0.55_2 from the ports tree, it segfaults when trying to start it with SSL. I installed as follows: cd /usr/ports/www/apache20 make WITH_SSL_MODULES=yes build make deinstall && make WITH_SSL_MODULES=yes reinstall apachectl stop && apachectl startssl output in /var/log/messages: pid 50069 (httpd), uid 0: exited on signal 11 (core dumped) output from gdb: #0 0x281a4e57 in X509_NAME_set () from /lib/libcrypto.so.3 System: FreeBSD 5.3-RELEASE-p2 i386 Starting it without SSL works fine. Any help appreciated. Thanks Adrian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 09:03:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D70B816A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:03:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from smtpauth01.mail.atl.earthlink.net (smtpauth01.mail.atl.earthlink.net [209.86.89.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C91543D46 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:03:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from [206.255.31.21] (helo=grokwell.org) by smtpauth01.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.34) id 1ExKq4-0002Hw-S3 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 04:03:17 -0500 Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 03:03:22 -0600 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060113030322.5939bae3@grokwell.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.100 (GTK+ 2.8.9; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69563f9fea00a6dd62bc0bdda169e776ce62a158402c6592bf5e350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 206.255.31.21 Subject: php5 and apache2? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:03:20 -0000 I just finished upgrading via portupgrade and found that I now have both apache13 and apache2 installed. Upon examination of the php5 port, I've found that the "WITH_APACHE2=YES" option is no longer available. I'd like to stick with apache2 since I had everything working nicely (php5, webdav, ssl, etc). Any advice? Thanks, Andrew Gould From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 09:10:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF75616A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:10:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gandalf@messias.qhigh.com) Received: from smtp.enternet.hu (smtp.enternet.hu [62.112.192.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FC9A43D49 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:10:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gandalf@messias.qhigh.com) Received: from [83.216.45.176] (helo=[172.16.0.26]) by smtp.enternet.hu with esmtpa (Exim 4) id 1ExKwd-0005Bz-R2; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:10:04 +0100 Message-ID: <43C76E56.9040306@messias.qhigh.com> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:09:42 +0100 From: gandalf User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (Windows/20050317) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Andrew L. Gould" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060113030322.5939bae3@grokwell.org> In-Reply-To: <20060113030322.5939bae3@grokwell.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: php5 and apache2? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:10:08 -0000 Andrew L. Gould wrote: >I just finished upgrading via portupgrade and found that I now have >both apache13 and apache2 installed. Upon examination of the php5 port, I've found >that the "WITH_APACHE2=YES" option is no longer available. > >I'd like to stick with apache2 since I had everything working nicely >(php5, webdav, ssl, etc). > >Any advice? > > I had the same problem before. I suppose you used portupgrade to install binary packages, right? The php5 package depends on apache13, this is why portupgrade installed apache13. You should deinstall php5 and apache13. Then refresh your ports tree. Finally, reinstall php5 from the ports: cd /usr/ports/lang/php5 make make install cd /usr/ports/lang/php5-extensions make make install This will detect your apache2 installation and will compile with apache2. Best, Les From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 09:22:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B84B16A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:22:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from riemer@palstra.com) Received: from palstra.com (palstra.demon.nl [212.238.156.173]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0B5843D45 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:22:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from riemer@palstra.com) Received: from riemer by palstra.com with local (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ExL8O-000NH5-5w; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:22:12 +0100 Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:22:12 +0100 From: Riemer Palstra To: Beastie Message-ID: <20060113092211.GC56703@p3.a152.palstra.com> References: <43C5CC81.6060104@mra.co.id> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43C5CC81.6060104@mra.co.id> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freeradius freebsd-6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:22:16 -0000 On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 10:26:57AM +0700, Beastie wrote: > main: pidfile = "/var/run/radiusd/radiusd.pid" Is /var/run/radiusd/ owned by radius:radius? -- Riemer Palstra Amsterdam, The Netherlands riemer@palstra.com http://www.palstra.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 09:50:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D82116A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:50:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rasputnik@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.202]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D504A43D45 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:50:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rasputnik@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so411089wxc for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 01:50:49 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=HEgM3I9vRL8JqNUkoZf08yE8e/kxHxytzk1Hxrmy4JTuzgkgv43ZQmjiLnuqU1zcPbCCgFEWQBkuDlooCPYxBkT2p82kvpguIaMTBIOyV3U0nP/cyi7NLEqt/V8hbhIcd3Urm0x+g2+nyvPkGh+KOEnIa9NzI6RDnNBP/XpmHy0= Received: by 10.70.109.3 with SMTP id h3mr3456023wxc; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 01:50:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.69.17 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 01:50:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3f1760601130150n586b0b2dr@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:50:48 +0000 From: Dick Davies To: f-q In-Reply-To: <20060113052959.GA15340@holestein.holy.cow> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060113052959.GA15340@holestein.holy.cow> Subject: Re: Syntax of dhclient.conf(5) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:50:50 -0000 There should be semicolons after each line. On 13/01/06, Parv wrote: > I failed to find detailed syntax layout in dhclient.conf(5) man page, > via web search, or be able to deduce from files in > /misc/src/sbin/dhclient. I was looking for something like as given in > (i)pf.conf(5) man pages. > > Could somebody point me to a detailed document documenting the syntax? > Alternatively, please help me understand what am i missing from the > dhclient.conf listed below which results in following parsing error > messages ... > > /etc/dhclient.conf line 11: expecting identifier after option keyword. > { > ^ > /etc/dhclient.conf line 18: expecting a statement. > } > ^ > /etc/dhclient.conf line 32: semicolon expected. > > ^ > > ... dhclient.conf ... > > 1 > 2 # FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE's dhclient empties /etc/resolv.conf & default= route is > 3 # not being assigned. Remedy this by having sane entries here in = dhclient.conf. > 4 > 5 request subnet-mask , routers , domain-name-servers; > 6 require routers , domain-name-servers; > 7 > 8 interface "em0" > 9 { > 10 default > 11 { > 12 fixed-address 192.168.2.100 > 13 , option subnet-mask 0xffffff00 > 14 , option routers 192.168.2.1 > 15 } (if you're setting all these yourself, why are you bothering to do dhcp on that interface?) There should be semicolons after each line in the braces, and the leading dots before option aren't something I recognize. It's a pity there isn't a simple (but not blank!) one in /usr/share/examples, I could have sworn there used to be. -- Rasputin :: Jack of All Trades - Master of Nuns http://number9.hellooperator.net/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 09:57:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E67C016A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:57:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from carpetsmoker@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6310343D45 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:57:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from carpetsmoker@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i20so562116wra for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 01:57:23 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=hvIXlRLs1pzJCSA0DFVpV7iP8tWMjhqXdXHPWnB29WWqtpYaEtutgco6vJXBhJ0W/t5eecJwkXd80P+vkjQqb42kXdyx3Qbrhgor/3sAeBi8r+8qAsKYbt2XrLP0J25DuOr1DFJP67vESYBJ7cGvX8iwoVDyCjk7vH8R0cw+ZjE= Received: by 10.65.22.18 with SMTP id z18mr1704321qbi; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 01:57:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.72.1 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 01:57:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4dd4cddf0601130157h4f8b7a0eh@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:57:22 +0000 From: Martin Tournoy To: Josh Paetzel In-Reply-To: <200601121027.55758.josh@tcbug.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <200601101604.55833.josh@tcbug.org> <4dd4cddf0601110443r5e726a86t@mail.gmail.com> <282b2dd90601120225x39403341mf7a01f37837791ee@mail.gmail.com> <200601121027.55758.josh@tcbug.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Slow 2d performance in X / opera / nvidia drivers X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:57:25 -0000 Don't see any XOrg log file, you forgot to attatch it? And what is Xinerama, i thought it was a window manager like KDE or gnome..= .? Try loading from the open-source driver, or generic vga or vesa, will that improve preformance? You said problems started to occur with Opera 8 and later, did you try using opera 7.x or 6.x? it those work alright I think opera support would be the best place to be.... On 12/01/06, Josh Paetzel wrote: > On Thursday 12 January 2006 04:25 am, Joseph Kerian wrote: > > On 1/11/06, Martin Tournoy wrote: > > > On 10/01/06, Josh Paetzel wrote: > > > > *many helpful attachments snipped* > > > > > > I've been having terrible 2d performance with opera > > > > (linux-opera and native 8.51 and 9.0) using the nvidia drivers. > > > > When I windowshade it and then restore it there is a sizeable > > > > delay while it redraws the window. If I rapidly shade and > > > > restore the window my idle CPU time goes to 0% and mp3 playback > > > > will occassionally skip. > > > > > > > > The problem first started when Opera 8 was released, I hoped > > > > that further releases would address it but so far that has not > > > > been the case. Any suggestions for a fix welcome. > > > > > > > > (Yes, I have been seeking support on opera.com but this feels > > > > like a FreeBSD mis-configuration of some sort on my end. :) > > > > > > You might try turning the twinview of, it takes up heaps of > > > resources on my machine, then again, your machine has 300% more > > > RAM and clockspeed, so it should be able to handle it fine.... > > > > > > Try using freebsd AGP, the nvidia should work better but you > > > might want to try it anyway... > > > > The other useful file for this might be your Xorg log. > > > > > Which window manager do you use, I noted that KDE can be really, > > > really slow even on newer machines (Krap Desktop Enviorment) > > > > *bites the troll* > > > > > Is this problem ONLY with opera? or with other applications to? > > > if you have another QT application you might want try how that > > > runs. Also check you QT version, maybe it's ancient? > > > > > > Did you try using both the static/shared QT versions? If not, it > > > might make a diffrence. > > > > I haven't had this problem at all with Opera on the ports KDE, > > using a far inferior nvidia card. > > I have had a bit of shared library wierdness, but Opera simply > > refused to run until I fixed that. > > > > If this is a PCI-Express card, note the discussion of 3d > > performance here: > > http://www.nvnews.net/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=3D59981 > > Well, I think I may have found the problem but can't seem to find a > fix to test my theory. Xorg is loading Xinerama and I've found some > noise via google that there is a 'nvidia-xinerama' that is faster > than the native 'xorg-xinerama'. I've tried disabling xinerama in my > Xorg conf file but it loads anyways. > > Attached is my xorg.log > > -- > Thanks, > > Josh Paetzel > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 09:59:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92D7216A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:59:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: from uproxy.gmail.com (uproxy.gmail.com [66.249.92.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E632343D45 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:59:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pietro.cerutti@gmail.com) Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id o2so57481uge for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 01:59:36 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=bmkjU2wavtWGYgRagqFc1keQ3tuTSxNQI4VxwA7Mm6RWgagsQJUE4/KCc0Khx57JImphTj17vmI4wqa0Q11vrP1r7xmxLxReS3AYCj2uvOtLptPRwpk6BCKOt3Ualk68Nb/DRcjoYnjW+pJnyTYCOkD3Cxzbu26En9BSFP98CzM= Received: by 10.48.43.4 with SMTP id q4mr51157nfq; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 01:35:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.9.1 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 01:35:18 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:35:18 +0100 From: Pietro Cerutti To: questions@freebsd.org, TuxGirl In-Reply-To: <6e4453640601122050k445515bdtbf2940e8b399284f@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <6e4453640601122050k445515bdtbf2940e8b399284f@mail.gmail.com> Cc: Subject: Re: portupgrade and portversion seg-fault in freebsd 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:59:38 -0000 On 1/13/06, TuxGirl wrote: > [amon-re /root] portupgrade -aP > [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 320 > packages found (-1 +0) > (...)/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:466: [BUG] > Segmentation fault > ruby 1.8.2 (2004-12-25) [i386-freebsd6] The first thing I would do is de/re-install ruby, have you tried it? > ~TuxGirl -- Pietro Cerutti Non lasciar calpestare i TUOI diritti! Don't let 'em take YOUR rights! NO al Trusted Computing! Say NO to Trusted Computing! www.no1984.org www.againsttcpa.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 09:59:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B3C316A434 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:59:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from crispy.beef@ntlworld.com) Received: from mta07-winn.ispmail.ntl.com (mta07-winn.ispmail.ntl.com [81.103.221.47]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E53943D64 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:59:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from crispy.beef@ntlworld.com) Received: from aamta10-winn.ispmail.ntl.com ([81.103.221.35]) by mta07-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20060113095950.EFYV15999.mta07-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@aamta10-winn.ispmail.ntl.com>; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:59:50 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.2] (really [82.12.81.129]) by aamta10-winn.ispmail.ntl.com with ESMTP id <20060113095950.BYQD24348.aamta10-winn.ispmail.ntl.com@[192.168.0.2]>; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:59:50 +0000 Message-ID: <43C77A14.7090004@ntlworld.com> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:59:48 +0000 From: Crispy Beef User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gandalf References: <20060113030322.5939bae3@grokwell.org> <43C76E56.9040306@messias.qhigh.com> In-Reply-To: <43C76E56.9040306@messias.qhigh.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: php5 and apache2? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:59:57 -0000 > I had the same problem before. I suppose you used portupgrade to install > binary packages, right? > The php5 package depends on apache13, this is why portupgrade installed > apache13. > You should deinstall php5 and apache13. Then refresh your ports tree. > Finally, reinstall php5 from the ports: > > cd /usr/ports/lang/php5 > make > make install > cd /usr/ports/lang/php5-extensions > make > make install Might also be a good idea to delete the php5 options file first too. It's located here: /var/db/ports/php5/options There's one for php5-extensions too. Normally the settings in these files are taken from doing a 'make config' so if you want to start totally from scratch you probably want to ditch those too. Hope this helps a little. -- Paul From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 10:01:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80E4116A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:01:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from apircalabu@bitdefender.com) Received: from mail.bitdefender.com (ns.bitdefender.com [217.156.83.1]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8825E43D46 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:01:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from apircalabu@bitdefender.com) Received: (qmail 15328 invoked by uid 1010); 13 Jan 2006 12:01:48 +0200 Received: from apircalabu.dsd.ro (10.10.15.22) by mail.bitdefender.com with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 13 Jan 2006 12:01:48 +0200 Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:00:57 +0200 From: Adi Pircalabu To: TuxGirl Message-ID: <20060113120057.306227d0@apircalabu.dsd.ro> In-Reply-To: <6e4453640601122050k445515bdtbf2940e8b399284f@mail.gmail.com> References: <6e4453640601122050k445515bdtbf2940e8b399284f@mail.gmail.com> Organization: BitDefender X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.100 (GTK+ 2.8.10; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BitDefender-SpamStamp: 1.1.4 049000040111AAAAAAE X-BitDefender-Scanner: Clean, Agent: BitDefender Qmail 1.6.2 on mail.bitdefender.com X-BitDefender-Spam: No (0) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade and portversion seg-fault in freebsd 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:01:55 -0000 On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:50:58 -0700 TuxGirl wrote: > [amon-re /root] portupgrade -aP > [Updating the pkgdb in /var/db/pkg ... - 320 > packages found (-1 +0) > (...)/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/pkgdb.rb:466: [BUG] > Segmentation fault Quick, dirty and effective: # rm -f /var/db/pkg/pkgdb.db && pkgdb -u -- Adi Pircalabu (PGP Key ID 0x04329F5E) -- This message was scanned for spam and viruses by BitDefender. For more information please visit http://www.bitdefender.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 10:09:39 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FAEC16A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:09:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9C5843D49 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:09:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0DA9PIq001594 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:09:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k0DA9O0g001591 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:09:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:09:24 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060113110835.P1510@chylonia.3miasto.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Subject: fdisk: Geom not found X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:09:39 -0000 . . . parameters to be used for BIOS calculations are: cylinders=125 heads=255 sectors/track=63 (16065 blks/cyl) Information from DOS bootblock is: 1: sysid 6 (0x06),(Primary 'big' DOS (>= 32MB)) start 63, size 2008062 (980 Meg), flag 80 (active) beg: cyl 0/ head 1/ sector 1; end: cyl 124/ head 254/ sector 63 2: 3: 4: Should we write new partition table? [n] y fdisk: Geom not found ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ what's wrong? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 11:02:55 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A62516A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:02:55 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Susanka@wisematch.net) Received: from smtp.nildram.co.uk (smtp.nildram.co.uk [195.112.4.54]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8BD043D45 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:02:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Susanka@wisematch.net) Received: from wisematch.wisematch.net (wmsltd1.gotadsl.co.uk [84.12.136.113]) by smtp.nildram.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C894255514 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:02:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wisematch.wisematch.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 707C9F0887 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:01:59 +0000 (GMT) Received: from wisematch.wisematch.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (wisematch [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 26481-13 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:01:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: by wisematch.wisematch.net (Postfix, from userid 1002) id 21771F0C0F; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:01:57 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [192.168.1.50] (unknown [192.168.1.50])by wisematch.wisematch.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05B6CF0C0Ffor ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:01:57 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <43C78AF9.9010808@wisematch.net> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:11:53 +0000 From: Susanka Kodisinghe User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Copyrighted-Material: Please visit http://www.wisematch.net X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at wisematch.net Cc: Subject: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:02:55 -0000 hi this regarding Midicart PHP Shopping Cart i have used your demo s/w and i am happy with your shopping cart solution. i nead clear some infomation befor buy that s/w. doest it support order processing feature and stock control feature in complete solution. thank you. susanka ---------- Disclaimer ---------- This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you have received this email in error please notify the sender by replying to this e-mail containing this attachment. Replies to this email may be monitored by Wisematch Services Limited for operational or business reasons. Whilst every endeavor is taken to ensure that e-mails are free from viruses, no liability can be accepted and the recipient is requested to use their own virus checking software. This email has been scanned for viruses using ClamAv available from http://www.clamav.net/ under the GPL licence. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 11:29:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C075616A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:29:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sveinhal@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5239B43D45 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:29:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from sveinhal@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id s9so422364wxc for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 03:29:58 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=PaqUVi6+Bj95lj1dfa72xPU2mlNNU/325CF1GQWHjEaad0TTCPwFrMak6hc132jb5t71quFtIQPwL4NtqNxQC6zxtakbs14unk1Hu6Gta9o/2PNKwf42nnZ2pTZ8Vw0u73/Kvo9WaXcsP0Bq0sDV9ZTnXBcf6boplBGwtzaDZlc= Received: by 10.70.75.2 with SMTP id x2mr3507491wxa; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 03:29:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.105.11 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 03:29:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:29:57 +0100 From: Svein Halvor Halvorsen Sender: sveinhal@gmail.com To: Susanka Kodisinghe In-Reply-To: <43C78AF9.9010808@wisematch.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <43C78AF9.9010808@wisematch.net> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:29:59 -0000 On 1/13/06, Susanka Kodisinghe wrote: > this regarding Midicart PHP Shopping Cart > i have used your demo s/w and i am happy with your shopping cart > solution. i nead clear some infomation befor buy that s/w. FreeBSD is an operating system. Also, it's free. You might be thinking of something else. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 11:30:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 100B416A420 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:30:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from hermes2.cf.ac.uk (hermes2.cf.ac.uk [131.251.0.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D4DB43D4C for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:30:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrir.insrv.cf.ac.uk ([131.251.50.213]) by hermes2.cf.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ExN8L-0007Va-D5; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:30:17 +0000 In-Reply-To: <43C78AF9.9010808@wisematch.net> References: <43C78AF9.9010808@wisematch.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-2--69173680" Message-Id: <7C5D1544-4DB6-48CA-B57D-7D24B5D1B07C@submonkey.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ceri Davies Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:30:16 +0000 To: Susanka Kodisinghe X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.1 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: Cardiff University Sophos AV Cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: (no subject) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:30:20 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-2--69173680 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On 13 Jan 2006, at 11:11, Susanka Kodisinghe wrote: > hi > this regarding Midicart PHP Shopping Cart i have used your demo s/ > w and i am happy with your shopping cart solution. i nead clear > some infomation befor buy that s/w. > > doest it support order processing feature and stock control feature > in complete solution. > > thank you. > susanka Hi Susanka, I think you have the wrong email address; we don't make this kind of software. Ceri --Apple-Mail-2--69173680 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDx49Ime8yCsQvJJ0RAkeHAJ9fL3fpUJhZFa7PV58BqAoeVgyYYwCfQaZM B5z9gjGVwBd9pp5R8kVKGu0= =TwlE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-2--69173680-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 11:32:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1F7416A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:32:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from offbyone@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp8.wanadoo.fr (smtp8.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.23]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34BD043D5A for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:32:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from offbyone@xs4all.nl) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0801.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id AD1F21800065 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:32:27 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (ADijon-151-1-28-66.w83-194.abo.wanadoo.fr [83.194.124.66]) by mwinf0801.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 49F68180005A for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:32:27 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20060113113227303.49F68180005A@mwinf0801.wanadoo.fr Message-ID: <43C78D52.60301@xs4all.nl> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:21:54 +0100 From: offbyone User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20060109) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: XFree86 on FreeBSD 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:32:29 -0000 My problem: Running FreeBSD_5.4-RELEASE with XFree86-4.5.0, there is a mis-match: the underlying o.s. and newly installed and upgraded ports expect X.org After portupgrade of an X-supported port, this mis-match shows up as "stale dependency(ies)" It's a bore repeatedly to point new and upgraded ports to XFree86-libraries-4.5.0, etc. (and there is no XFree86 component that corresponds directly to X.org-TrueType, or is there?) My questions: 0.) How to change the underlying o.s. default expectation to XFree86 AND is this a good idea for the present and future of 5.x? 1.) Is a better solution to bite the bullet, deinstall all XFree86 components and install X.org, since FreeBDS is 5.x? (N.B. I do not want to start a flame over XFree86 vs. X.org. That's a too-old and pointless debate, and I have no inherent reason to prefer one over the other.) Thanks, very much. for more info, suggestions. Jake From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 11:41:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A867A16A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:41:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from muxas@mail.ru) Received: from mx2.mail.ru (mx2.mail.ru [194.67.23.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12E1643D4C for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:41:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from muxas@mail.ru) Received: from [80.243.73.98] (port=57579 helo=[80.243.73.98]) by mx2.mail.ru with asmtp id 1ExNIw-00055U-00 for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:41:15 +0300 Message-ID: <43C81E6D.5010702@mail.ru> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:41:01 +0000 From: Maxim Vetrov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051217 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: dhclient fixed leases X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:41:22 -0000 Hi to all, I can't configure dhclient to use fixed lease on a network with no dhcp server. I use my notebook to connect to several different networks. Some of them have dhcp servers, some do not. Just tired of manual config on the latter. I've done man dhclient.conf and found that I can cope with that. so there is my dhclient.conf: timeout 15; retry 180; reboot 5; lease { interface "sis0"; fixed-address 10.0.1.4; option routers 10.0.1.5; option host-name "mobile"; option subnet-mask 255.255.255.248; expire 5 2010/1/1 00:00:00; renew 5 2010/1/1 0:0:0; rebind 5 2010/1/1 0:0:0; } interface "sis0" { send dhcp-lease-time 600; send host-name "mobile"; request broadcast-address,routers,subnet-mask,domain-name,domain-name-servers,time-servers,netbios-name-servers; } When it boots these messages are displayed: > Trying recorded lease 10.0.1.4 > bound: renewal in 125116757 seconds. and nothing happen. The peer's address on the othe side of cross-wired cable is 10.0.1.5 netmask 255.255.255.248. When I > ifconfig sis0 inet 10.0.1.4 netmask 255.255.255.248 up and ping connection is alive. What do I do wrong? Muxas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 11:43:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A23516A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:43:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAC8143D45 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:43:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id l1so557159nzf for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 03:43:43 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NLs4HG2Ay33abD8rZqmjCJFSc6XI8d01yAtgSKpEGWeJ/n1pKU5hB6Hw06zuzfzShWviU8pQwo0YstA6ucKZbnWfpoDijNOHngvUpFGbW2Zyczw/U0ZnlXbsGv63S07koCRDLRdQcbnGe9kK77eKsy3T4noGWMIZX1+aERHiuYA= Received: by 10.36.77.16 with SMTP id z16mr2592342nza; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 03:43:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.20.67 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 03:43:42 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:43:42 +0300 From: "Andrew P." To: offbyone In-Reply-To: <43C78D52.60301@xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <43C78D52.60301@xs4all.nl> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: XFree86 on FreeBSD 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:43:44 -0000 On 1/13/06, offbyone wrote: > My problem: > Running FreeBSD_5.4-RELEASE with XFree86-4.5.0, there is a mis-match: > the underlying o.s. and newly installed and upgraded ports expect X.org > After portupgrade of an X-supported port, this mis-match shows up as > "stale dependency(ies)" It's a bore repeatedly to point new and upgraded > ports to XFree86-libraries-4.5.0, etc. (and there is no XFree86 > component that corresponds directly to X.org-TrueType, or is there?) > My questions: > 0.) How to change the underlying o.s. default expectation to XFree86 AND > is this a good idea for the present and future of 5.x? Look at /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf > 1.) Is a better solution to bite the bullet, deinstall all XFree86 > components and install X.org, since FreeBDS is 5.x? Sure. There's no debate about it whatsoever. You are also avdised to bite another bullet and upgrade to FreeBSD 6, it's a painless/seamless procedure now. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 12:36:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7CE816A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:36:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pablolb@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52A1B43D48 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:36:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pablolb@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 67so571433wri for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 04:36:52 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=mZzC+Wji+7fb5rgpmLmNRJmljXG1dUT9qHWl18dtTlCppQMRmfTaMtuZS6FmSnVCGlYnKfdauIXiuohVmlArNaeIkemyJMFhxca0q+uXdbC4pKLr0+8WJKwV/Oh2dx+tJWLZeb914N7/9b/YiADMkIc1z55jTU141iodL3T20qY= Received: by 10.65.211.20 with SMTP id n20mr789069qbq; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 04:36:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.236.9 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 04:36:52 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:36:52 -0300 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Pablo_de_Le=F3n_Belloc?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: ueagle driver on FreeBSD 6.0 Stable X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:36:53 -0000 Hi, Does anybody have success stories about using eagle-based adsl modems with only USB interface and PPPoE on FreeBSD 6.0 Stable ? It says in: http://damien.bergamini.free.fr/ueagle/ That ueagle2 "Should support PPPoE (though not tested)" and I know you have to patch it up for it to build because of some renamings in sys/net/if_var.h. I managed to build the uegale1.5 driver (didn't realize about the difference between 1.5 and 2 then...) and I guess I'll try again when I have time before moving to another alternative. Maybe somebody already managed to make this work or knows it won't work ? Thanks, Pablo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 12:41:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F059B16A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:41:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from hermes2.cf.ac.uk (hermes2.cf.ac.uk [131.251.0.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 742C443D4C for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:41:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrir.insrv.cf.ac.uk ([131.251.50.213]) by hermes2.cf.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ExOFC-00031P-Bu; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:41:26 +0000 In-Reply-To: <43C81E6D.5010702@mail.ru> References: <43C81E6D.5010702@mail.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-5--64904436" Message-Id: <28BD0476-A2EE-4AD1-9E83-1E406366322A@submonkey.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ceri Davies Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:41:25 +0000 To: Maxim Vetrov X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.1 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: Cardiff University Sophos AV Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: dhclient fixed leases X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:41:32 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-5--64904436 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On 13 Jan 2006, at 21:41, Maxim Vetrov wrote: > Hi to all, > > I can't configure dhclient to use fixed lease on a network with no > dhcp server. I use my notebook to connect to several different > networks. Some of them have dhcp servers, some do not. Just tired > of manual config on the latter. I've done man dhclient.conf and > found that I can cope with that. so there is my dhclient.conf: > > timeout 15; > retry 180; > reboot 5; > > lease { > interface "sis0"; > fixed-address 10.0.1.4; > option routers 10.0.1.5; > option host-name "mobile"; > option subnet-mask 255.255.255.248; > expire 5 2010/1/1 00:00:00; > renew 5 2010/1/1 0:0:0; > rebind 5 2010/1/1 0:0:0; > } > > interface "sis0" { > send dhcp-lease-time 600; > send host-name "mobile"; > request broadcast-address,routers,subnet-mask,domain- > name,domain-name-servers,time-servers,netbios-name-servers; > } > > When it boots these messages are displayed: > > Trying recorded lease 10.0.1.4 > > bound: renewal in 125116757 seconds. > and nothing happen. > > The peer's address on the othe side of cross-wired cable is > 10.0.1.5 netmask 255.255.255.248. When I > > ifconfig sis0 inet 10.0.1.4 netmask 255.255.255.248 up > and ping connection is alive. > > What do I do wrong? Pass, but I found the same when I tried this a few weeks ago. Then Santa gave me a new access point which came free with a whole bunch of other problems so I didn't look into it too hard. I'm glad it's not just me, though. Ceri --Apple-Mail-5--64904436 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDx5/1me8yCsQvJJ0RAloQAJ9jw/lR5DkVkuC5lvYXvzlabLN5ngCgr/fL PhroIIbDLmkTb2mg4nweL88= =ooZq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-5--64904436-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 12:42:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0466D16A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:42:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from hermes2.cf.ac.uk (hermes2.cf.ac.uk [131.251.0.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 878D043D46 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:42:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrir.insrv.cf.ac.uk ([131.251.50.213]) by hermes2.cf.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ExOGM-0003A6-LX; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:42:38 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20060113064651.GC67625@sysadm.stc> References: <20060113064651.GC67625@sysadm.stc> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-6--64832373" Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ceri Davies Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:42:37 +0000 To: Igor Robul X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.1 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: Cardiff University Sophos AV Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: defaultroute not loading X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:42:40 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-6--64832373 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On 13 Jan 2006, at 06:46, Igor Robul wrote: > On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 11:37:27PM +0000, Michael Zimmer wrote: >> rc.subr > Why? >> >> hostname="#####.com" >> defaultrouter=1.2.3.4 # previously "1.2.3.4"; >> removed > You need "1.2.3.4", because in manual page for rc.conf it is marked > as (str). Yes, but it's just a shell script so that should be fine. Ceri --Apple-Mail-6--64832373 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDx6A9me8yCsQvJJ0RAu0WAKCPvrLoK+G0VU6IVRTbjSdbVH+3QwCfZ5Cf 2s2I/iP+sbDy9uFJvQXHmrE= =JmKB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-6--64832373-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 12:49:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1B2316A420 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:49:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from hermes2.cf.ac.uk (hermes2.cf.ac.uk [131.251.0.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ADB343D48 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:49:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrir.insrv.cf.ac.uk ([131.251.50.213]) by hermes2.cf.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ExOMe-0003VP-VZ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:49:08 +0000 In-Reply-To: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-7--64441858" Message-Id: <06D1CA39-54B8-4B7A-96D9-6B8A8C652C6E@submonkey.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ceri Davies Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:49:07 +0000 To: Michael Zimmer X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.1 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: Cardiff University Sophos AV Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: defaultroute not loading X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:49:12 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-7--64441858 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On 12 Jan 2006, at 23:37, Michael Zimmer wrote: > > I just updated a i386 gateway to 6.0-STABLE - using my backed-up > versions [from 5.1] of: > > rc.conf > rc.firewall > rc.resume > rc.sendmail > rc.shutdown > rc.subr > rc.suspend > resolv.conf > sysctl.conf > ipnat.rules > ipf.rules > > ...and the default route won't load on boot, although it is > specified > in rc.conf (replace all non-comment #'s and 1.2.3.4 with appropriate > numbers....) > > hostname="#####.com" > defaultrouter=1.2.3.4 # previously "1.2.3.4"; > removed > Could you post the output of "sh -x /etc/rc.d/routing start"? Please try to resist editing it too. Is this working for anyone on 6.0-STABLE? I don't see anywhere in /etc where the default route is actually installed. Ceri --Apple-Mail-7--64441858 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDx6HEme8yCsQvJJ0RAv/9AJ9ImHW7fYlK6s7lszzPeiVqONy1GQCgjs35 VVkvagGO+NjV9kXPak1mXyo= =khtH -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-7--64441858-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 13:08:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DC6216A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:08:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: from lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (mail.bathnetworks.com [84.92.24.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A06E843D48 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:08:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: (qmail 30703 invoked by uid 510); 13 Jan 2006 13:12:11 +0000 Received: from 84.92.24.252 by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (envelope-from , uid 508) with qmail-scanner-1.24-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.87/1146. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.24-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-3.8/5.0):. Processed in 1.281043 secs); 13 Jan 2006 13:12:11 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.8 required=5.0 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: bsd@bathnetworks.com via lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.24-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-3.8/5.0):. Processed in 1.281043 secs Process 30696) Received: from mail.bathnetworks.com (HELO ?84.92.24.252?) (bsd@bathnetworks.com@84.92.24.252) by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk with SMTP; 13 Jan 2006 13:12:10 +0000 From: Robert Slade To: offbyone In-Reply-To: <43C78D52.60301@xs4all.nl> References: <43C78D52.60301@xs4all.nl> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1137157930.28855.56.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:12:10 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: XFree86 on FreeBSD 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:08:43 -0000 On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 11:21, offbyone wrote: > My problem: > Running FreeBSD_5.4-RELEASE with XFree86-4.5.0, there is a mis-match: > the underlying o.s. and newly installed and upgraded ports expect X.org > After portupgrade of an X-supported port, this mis-match shows up as > "stale dependency(ies)" It's a bore repeatedly to point new and upgraded > ports to XFree86-libraries-4.5.0, etc. (and there is no XFree86 > component that corresponds directly to X.org-TrueType, or is there?) > My questions: > 0.) How to change the underlying o.s. default expectation to XFree86 AND > is this a good idea for the present and future of 5.x? > 1.) Is a better solution to bite the bullet, deinstall all XFree86 > components and install X.org, since FreeBDS is 5.x? > (N.B. I do not want to start a flame over XFree86 vs. X.org. That's a > too-old and pointless debate, and I have no inherent reason to prefer > one over the other.) > Thanks, very much. for more info, suggestions. > Jake > Jake, I am sorry I do not have an answer. but when I installed 5.4 not long ago it installed Xorg as the default from the iso. Did you update to 5.4 from an earlier version? Rob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 13:34:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8A4716A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:34:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 396CD43D49 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:34:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1ExP47-0004xU-M0 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:34:03 +0100 Received: from 62.97.242.158 ([62.97.242.158]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:34:03 +0100 Received: from solskogen by 62.97.242.158 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:34:03 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Christer Solskogen Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:35:56 +0100 Lines: 10 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.97.242.158 User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) In-Reply-To: Sender: news Subject: Re: defaultroute not loading X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:34:31 -0000 Michael Zimmer wrote: > > I just updated a i386 gateway to 6.0-STABLE - using my backed-up > versions [from 5.1] of: > You didn't forget running mergemaster? -- chs From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 14:08:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC1A216A420 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:08:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.daemonsecurity.com (59.Red-81-33-11.staticIP.rima-tde.net [81.33.11.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67A0143D49 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:08:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [172.24.8.84] (generic.ATOSORIGIN.ES [212.170.156.200]) by strange.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A51F2E0A5; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:08:50 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43C7B4A6.9040004@locolomo.org> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:09:42 +0100 From: Erik Norgaard User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maxim Vetrov References: <43C81E6D.5010702@mail.ru> In-Reply-To: <43C81E6D.5010702@mail.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: dhclient fixed leases X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:08:54 -0000 Maxim Vetrov wrote: > I can't configure dhclient to use fixed lease on a network with no dhcp > server. I use my notebook to connect to several different networks. Some > of them have dhcp servers, some do not. Just tired of manual config on > the latter. I've done man dhclient.conf and found that I can cope with > that. so there is my dhclient.conf: > > timeout 15; > retry 180; > reboot 5; > > lease { > interface "sis0"; > fixed-address 10.0.1.4; > option routers 10.0.1.5; > option host-name "mobile"; > option subnet-mask 255.255.255.248; > expire 5 2010/1/1 00:00:00; > renew 5 2010/1/1 0:0:0; > rebind 5 2010/1/1 0:0:0; > } > > interface "sis0" { > send dhcp-lease-time 600; > send host-name "mobile"; > request > broadcast-address,routers,subnet-mask,domain-name,domain-name-servers,time-servers,netbios-name-servers; > > } > > When it boots these messages are displayed: > > Trying recorded lease 10.0.1.4 > > bound: renewal in 125116757 seconds. > and nothing happen. > > The peer's address on the othe side of cross-wired cable is 10.0.1.5 > netmask 255.255.255.248. When I > > ifconfig sis0 inet 10.0.1.4 netmask 255.255.255.248 up > and ping connection is alive. > > What do I do wrong? 1st: Which version of FreeBSD do you use? There is significant difference between 5.x and prior and 6.x and posterior. There was a discussion a few weeks ago, see "Wireless NIC in FreeBSD 6.0", I suggested to try to include a "default" section in the interface section, but the I never got an answer if this worked. Regards, Erik From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 14:14:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 549A416A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:14:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from smtpauth07.mail.atl.earthlink.net (smtpauth07.mail.atl.earthlink.net [209.86.89.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C24CF43D48 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:14:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from [206.255.31.21] (helo=grokwell.org) by smtpauth07.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.34) id 1ExPhA-0004J1-FH; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:14:24 -0500 Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 08:14:28 -0600 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: Crispy Beef Message-ID: <20060113081428.6afd6fe6@grokwell.org> In-Reply-To: <43C77A14.7090004@ntlworld.com> References: <20060113030322.5939bae3@grokwell.org> <43C76E56.9040306@messias.qhigh.com> <43C77A14.7090004@ntlworld.com> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.100 (GTK+ 2.8.9; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69563f9fea00a6dd62bc432601eb0a633a8e9e694a11257fe854350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 206.255.31.21 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, gandalf Subject: Re: php5 and apache2? -- Resolved X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:14:27 -0000 On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:59:48 +0000 Crispy Beef wrote: > > I had the same problem before. I suppose you used portupgrade to > > install binary packages, right? > > The php5 package depends on apache13, this is why portupgrade > > installed apache13. > > You should deinstall php5 and apache13. Then refresh your ports > > tree. Finally, reinstall php5 from the ports: > > > > cd /usr/ports/lang/php5 > > make > > make install > > cd /usr/ports/lang/php5-extensions > > make > > make install > > Might also be a good idea to delete the php5 options file first too. > It's located here: > > /var/db/ports/php5/options > > There's one for php5-extensions too. > > Normally the settings in these files are taken from doing a 'make > config' so if you want to start totally from scratch you probably > want to ditch those too. > > Hope this helps a little. > > -- > Paul I rebooted and deleted the php options file. The packages for php5, php5-extensions and apache13 have been deleted. Apache2 is still installed. When I go to /usr/ports/lang/php5 and do 'make config', there is not an option for using apache2. When I do 'make', the port begins to make the apache13 port. The php5 MAKEFILE includes the line: USE_APACHE= 1.3+ Changing the "13+" in that line to "2+" breaks the MAKEFILE. Changing the line to "2.0+" works; but the port started building the version of apache2 that was already installed. I stopped the process, deleted the installed apache2 and executed the "make install clean" process in php5 again. Php5 and apache2 are now installed without apache13. I am now installing the extensions. Thanks for the help. Andrew Gould From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 14:23:31 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47F1A16A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:23:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stijn@pcwin002.win.tue.nl) Received: from kweetal.tue.nl (kweetal.tue.nl [131.155.3.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 707A843D45 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:23:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from stijn@pcwin002.win.tue.nl) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kweetal.tue.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2667B13B928; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:23:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from kweetal.tue.nl ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kweetal.tue.nl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 95660-01-10; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:22:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from umta.win.tue.nl (umta.win.tue.nl [131.155.71.100]) by kweetal.tue.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 942C213B8D2; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:16:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from pcwin002.win.tue.nl (pcwin002 [131.155.71.72]) by umta.win.tue.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85ED331401C; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:16:06 +0100 (CET) Received: by pcwin002.win.tue.nl (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 57E514124; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:16:06 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:16:06 +0100 From: Stijn Hoop To: Ceri Davies Message-ID: <20060113141606.GY63938@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> Mail-Followup-To: Stijn Hoop , Ceri Davies , Michael Zimmer , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <06D1CA39-54B8-4B7A-96D9-6B8A8C652C6E@submonkey.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ibvzjYYg+QDzMCy1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <06D1CA39-54B8-4B7A-96D9-6B8A8C652C6E@submonkey.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i X-Bright-Idea: Let's abolish HTML mail! X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at tue.nl Cc: Michael Zimmer , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: defaultroute not loading X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:23:31 -0000 --ibvzjYYg+QDzMCy1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 12:49:07PM +0000, Ceri Davies wrote: > On 12 Jan 2006, at 23:37, Michael Zimmer wrote: > > hostname=3D"#####.com" > > defaultrouter=3D1.2.3.4 # previously "1.2.3.4"; remov= ed > > Could you post the output of "sh -x /etc/rc.d/routing start"? > Please try to resist editing it too. >=20 > Is this working for anyone on 6.0-STABLE? I don't see anywhere > in /etc where the default route is actually installed. [stijn@sandcat] <~> grep defaultrouter /etc/rc.conf defaultrouter=3D"131.155.68.1" [stijn@sandcat] <~> netstat -rn | grep default default 131.155.68.1 UGS 0 484325 xl0 [stijn@sandcat] <~> bsdver FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE-p1 #2: Mon Jan 2 12:07:31 CET 2006 No other interfaces, so I'd say it works for me. --Stijn --=20 I really hate this damned machine I wish that they would sell it. It never does quite what I want But only what I tell it. --ibvzjYYg+QDzMCy1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDx7YmY3r/tLQmfWcRAtp+AJ0Tc+PqXwcA3m7DJrSjcCtvsd3CiACcCCIz +rSS2XTpZg0Df+NsUItvmvc= =fj9O -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ibvzjYYg+QDzMCy1-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 14:31:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C58D16A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:31:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from hermes2.cf.ac.uk (hermes2.cf.ac.uk [131.251.0.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9A7C43D46 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:31:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrir.insrv.cf.ac.uk ([131.251.50.213]) by hermes2.cf.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ExPxi-0000EX-JR; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:31:30 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20060113141606.GY63938@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> References: <06D1CA39-54B8-4B7A-96D9-6B8A8C652C6E@submonkey.net> <20060113141606.GY63938@pcwin002.win.tue.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-8--58304162" Message-Id: <99C47480-AAF0-4623-8926-6FE2DD71C3C6@submonkey.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ceri Davies Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:31:25 +0000 To: Stijn Hoop X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.1 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: Cardiff University Sophos AV Cc: Michael Zimmer , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: defaultroute not loading X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:31:32 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-8--58304162 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On 13 Jan 2006, at 14:16, Stijn Hoop wrote: > Hi, > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 12:49:07PM +0000, Ceri Davies wrote: >> On 12 Jan 2006, at 23:37, Michael Zimmer wrote: >>> hostname="#####.com" >>> defaultrouter=1.2.3.4 # previously "1.2.3.4"; >>> removed >> >> Could you post the output of "sh -x /etc/rc.d/routing start"? >> Please try to resist editing it too. >> >> Is this working for anyone on 6.0-STABLE? I don't see anywhere >> in /etc where the default route is actually installed. > > [stijn@sandcat] <~> grep defaultrouter /etc/rc.conf > defaultrouter="131.155.68.1" > [stijn@sandcat] <~> netstat -rn | grep default > default 131.155.68.1 UGS 0 484325 xl0 > [stijn@sandcat] <~> bsdver > FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE-p1 #2: Mon Jan 2 12:07:31 CET 2006 > > No other interfaces, so I'd say it works for me. Thank the gods for that. Could you send me the output of "sh -x /etc/rc.d/routing start" privately? I'm rather confused regarding where this happens. Ceri --Apple-Mail-8--58304162 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDx7nBme8yCsQvJJ0RAhA9AKCfwe2M/nuWABYHxco07go+5cXNfACfU9V+ eXqBnmkjdsrmpiotNYb0tEM= =7X6Q -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-8--58304162-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 14:36:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 314ED16A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:36:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from offbyone@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp9.wanadoo.fr (smtp9.wanadoo.fr [193.252.22.22]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D3A543D45 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:36:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from offbyone@xs4all.nl) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf0907.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 6FF781C00129 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:36:24 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (ADijon-151-1-28-66.w83-194.abo.wanadoo.fr [83.194.124.66]) by mwinf0907.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 107ED1C00124; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:36:23 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20060113143624677.107ED1C00124@mwinf0907.wanadoo.fr Message-ID: <43C7B871.6040405@xs4all.nl> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:25:53 +0100 From: offbyone User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20060109) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Robert Slade References: <43C78D52.60301@xs4all.nl> <1137157930.28855.56.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <1137157930.28855.56.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: XFree86 on FreeBSD 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:36:26 -0000 Robert Slade wrote: > On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 11:21, offbyone wrote: > >>My problem: >>Running FreeBSD_5.4-RELEASE with XFree86-4.5.0, there is a mis-match: >>the underlying o.s. and newly installed and upgraded ports expect X.org >>After portupgrade of an X-supported port, this mis-match shows up as >>"stale dependency(ies)" It's a bore repeatedly to point new and upgraded >> ports to XFree86-libraries-4.5.0, etc. (and there is no XFree86 >>component that corresponds directly to X.org-TrueType, or is there?) >>My questions: >>0.) How to change the underlying o.s. default expectation to XFree86 AND >> is this a good idea for the present and future of 5.x? >>1.) Is a better solution to bite the bullet, deinstall all XFree86 >>components and install X.org, since FreeBDS is 5.x? >>(N.B. I do not want to start a flame over XFree86 vs. X.org. That's a >>too-old and pointless debate, and I have no inherent reason to prefer >>one over the other.) >>Thanks, very much. for more info, suggestions. >>Jake >> > > > Jake, > > I am sorry I do not have an answer. but when I installed 5.4 not long > ago it installed Xorg as the default from the iso. Did you update to 5.4 > from an earlier version? > > Rob > > > Yes, from 5.1-RELEASE on CD-ROM; cvsup to 5.4-STABLE and built from source. # uname -a is: FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p8 FreeBSD 5.4-RELEASE-p8 #0: Sun Jan 8 15:26:20 CET 2006 X.org is included in the distribution, and I knew about the changed default. I just reflexively went with XFree86 during the install, out of long-established habit with FreeBSD. - Jake From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 14:42:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 426E916A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:42:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from muxas@mail.ru) Received: from mx6.mail.ru (mx6.mail.ru [194.67.23.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B459E43D49 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:42:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from muxas@mail.ru) Received: from [80.243.64.145] (port=8004 helo=[80.243.64.145]) by mx6.mail.ru with asmtp id 1ExQ7s-00035G-00; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:42:01 +0300 Message-ID: <43C848CB.2020809@mail.ru> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:41:47 +0000 From: Maxim Vetrov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.12) Gecko/20051217 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Erik Norgaard , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org References: <43C81E6D.5010702@mail.ru> <43C7B4A6.9040004@locolomo.org> In-Reply-To: <43C7B4A6.9040004@locolomo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: dhclient fixed leases X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:42:03 -0000 Erik Norgaard wrote: > Maxim Vetrov wrote: > >> I can't configure dhclient to use fixed lease on a network with no >> dhcp server. I use my notebook to connect to several different >> networks. Some of them have dhcp servers, some do not. Just tired of >> manual config on the latter. I've done man dhclient.conf and found >> that I can cope with that. so there is my dhclient.conf: >> >> timeout 15; >> retry 180; >> reboot 5; >> >> lease { >> interface "sis0"; >> fixed-address 10.0.1.4; >> option routers 10.0.1.5; >> option host-name "mobile"; >> option subnet-mask 255.255.255.248; >> expire 5 2010/1/1 00:00:00; >> renew 5 2010/1/1 0:0:0; >> rebind 5 2010/1/1 0:0:0; >> } >> >> interface "sis0" { >> send dhcp-lease-time 600; >> send host-name "mobile"; >> request >> broadcast-address,routers,subnet-mask,domain-name,domain-name-servers,time-servers,netbios-name-servers; >> >> } >> >> When it boots these messages are displayed: >> > Trying recorded lease 10.0.1.4 >> > bound: renewal in 125116757 seconds. >> and nothing happen. >> >> The peer's address on the othe side of cross-wired cable is 10.0.1.5 >> netmask 255.255.255.248. When I >> > ifconfig sis0 inet 10.0.1.4 netmask 255.255.255.248 up >> and ping connection is alive. >> >> What do I do wrong? > > > 1st: Which version of FreeBSD do you use? There is significant > difference between 5.x and prior and 6.x and posterior. > > There was a discussion a few weeks ago, see "Wireless NIC in FreeBSD > 6.0", I suggested to try to include a "default" section in the > interface section, but the I never got an answer if this worked. > > Regards, Erik > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > I'm on 6.0 release. The "default" will not help - I have several networks without dhcpd. So 'default option routers 10.0.1.5;' will work only for one and fail for others. Regards, Muxas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 14:50:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 280DF16A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:50:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from njt@ayvali.org) Received: from sanddollar.geekisp.com (sanddollar.geekisp.com [204.89.131.97]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2882143D46 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:50:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from njt@ayvali.org) Received: (qmail 22552 invoked by uid 1003); 13 Jan 2006 14:50:04 -0000 Received: from clam.int.geekisp.com (HELO clam.geekisp.com) (192.168.4.38) by mail.geekisp.com with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 13 Jan 2006 14:50:04 -0000 Received: from clam.geekisp.com (njt@localhost.geekisp.com [127.0.0.1]) by clam.geekisp.com (8.13.3/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k0DEo4Yu018095; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:50:04 -0500 (EST) Received: (from njt@localhost) by clam.geekisp.com (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id k0DEo3TY007615; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:50:03 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: clam.geekisp.com: njt set sender to njt@ayvali.org using -f Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:50:03 -0500 From: "N.J. Thomas" To: Hans Nieser Message-ID: <20060113145003.GJ2451@ayvali.org> References: <43C6E55A.8020500@xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43C6E55A.8020500@xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: mysql backups (was Re: Remote backups, reading from and writing to the same file) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:50:06 -0000 * Hans Nieser [2006-01-13 00:25:14 +0100]: > Among the things being backed up are my mysql database tables. This > made me wonder wether the backup could possibly get borked when mysql > writes to any of the mysql tables while tar is reading from them. Yes. While MySQL is writing to the the database, it will put the files on the disk in an inconsistent state. If you happen to copy those files while they are in that state, MySQL will see a corrupted database. > Do I really have to use MySQL's tools to do a proper SQL dump or stop > MySQL (and any other services that may write to files included in my > backup) before doing a backup? Do any of the more involved > remote-backup solutions have ways of working around this? Or is it > simply not possible to write to a file while it is being read? Here are some methods that people use that I am aware of: - Turn off the MySQL db the entire time you are backing up. No new software/hardware needed, but you incur db downtime. - Use replication: have a slave that is a copy of the master, whenever you want to back up, break the replication for a little while, copy the slave, and then resume the replication. No downtime, but you will need another box for this, so you have the cost of new hardware. - Use OS snapshotting. On Linux systems with LVM, it is possible to take an exact "snapshot" of the filesystem at any point in time without too much disk usage (assuming the lifetime that the snapshot exists is relatively short). So what you do in this case is write a script that tells MySQL to write lock the entire database and flush the cache, this takes a second or two and will bring the db files on disk to a consistent state. You then take a snapshot of the filesystem, and immediately resume MySQL when you have done that. Now, you just backup off of the snapshot, destroying it when you are done. No new hardware, but you will need a snapshot capable filesystem and write the script to do this. I'm not sure exactly what snapshotting features FreeBSD has...perhaps someone else could fill in this information. Also, you will have a short period of downtime during which the MySQL db is write locked. This may or may not be acceptable for you. hth, Thomas -- N.J. Thomas njt@ayvali.org Etiamsi occiderit me, in ipso sperabo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 14:52:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E417A16A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:52:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2571043D55 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:52:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id l1so586616nzf for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 06:52:48 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=BwsksY+RToKmJCjaADsFsRGXJAIqjc9YRf8CuA99G2kHXoI5qKMvw5zOT+g7tblj7JLG5KndCVMuUbtZVK0QFhNgJyEHCR9HATtQDjwyQOkUVXY6770XIVs6EUFWS0w/6srKHV7S63jvb32FOAnLdyPeb1Es8nc6QQFUlWTH2Hw= Received: by 10.36.9.16 with SMTP id 16mr2695271nzi; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 06:52:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.20.67 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 06:52:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:52:48 +0300 From: "Andrew P." To: Andrey Slusar , FreeBSD Questions In-Reply-To: <863bjsrybx.fsf@santinel.home.ua> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline References: <17520276234.20060113145928@ngs.ru> <863bjsrybx.fsf@santinel.home.ua> Cc: =?KOI8-R?B?7cHM2dvF1yDhzMXL08XK?= Subject: Re: help me! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:52:50 -0000 T24gMS8xMy8wNiwgQW5kcmV5IFNsdXNhciA8YW5yYXlAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmc+IHdyb3RlOgo+IEZy aSwgMTMgSmFuIDIwMDYgMTc6MjY6MzYgKzAzMDAsIHlvdSB3cm90ZToKPgo+ID4gPiBXaGVyZSBJ IGNhbiBkb3dubG9hZCBtZ2V0dHkgMS4xLjMwIGZvciBGcmVlQlNEIDQuOT8KPgo+ID4gbWdldHR5 K3NlbmRmYXggxdPU2CDXINDP0tTByC4g/tTPIMnNxc7OzyDUxcLFIM7V1s7PPwo+ID4g99PFINPP 0sPZIMXT1Ngg2sTF09g6Cj4gPiBmdHA6Ly9tZ2V0dHkuZ3JlZW5pZS5uZXQvcHViL21nZXR0eS9z b3VyY2UvMS4xLwo+Cj4gICBNYXliZSBtZ2V0dHkgcGFja2FnZSBmb3IgNC45LVJFTEVBU0UuCj4K PiAtLQo+IFJlZ2FyZHMsCj4gQW5kcmV5Lgo+CgpmdHA6Ly9mdHAtYXJjaGl2ZS5mcmVlYnNkLm9y Zy9wdWIvRnJlZUJTRC1BcmNoaXZlL29sZC1yZWxlYXNlcy9pMzg2LzQuOS1SRUxFQVNFL3BhY2th Z2VzL2NvbW1zL21nZXR0eS0xLjEuMzAuMTIuMTZfMi50Z3oK From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 14:56:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07D4C16A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:56:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A085C43D45 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:56:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 20267 invoked from network); 13 Jan 2006 14:56:34 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail8.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 13 Jan 2006 14:56:34 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id BBA2D28423; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:56:32 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060112182206.GB2451@ayvali.org> <20060112190930.86187.qmail@web31013.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20060112193140.GE2451@ayvali.org> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 13 Jan 2006 09:56:32 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20060112193140.GE2451@ayvali.org> Message-ID: <443bjsp467.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 18 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Help with panic: vm_fault X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:56:35 -0000 "N.J. Thomas" writes: > * Brad Marsh [2006-01-12 11:09:29 -0800]: > > or singly, not in pairs... > > This should never be the case. If your memory is acceptable one module > at a time, why wouldn't the system accept two? Capacitive loading, for one reason. Not common, but I've certainly seen it (particularly with lower-end machines a couple or so years back). And since different brands of memory modules will have different capacitances (and there may be some variation even among "identical" units), it may not be easy to reproduce. -- Lowell Gilbert, embedded/networking software engineer, Boston area http://be-well.ilk.org/~lowell/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 14:58:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3948916A428 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:58:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david@ion.lu) Received: from viefep20-int.chello.at (viefep12-int.chello.at [213.46.255.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3279143D46 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:58:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from david@ion.lu) Received: from [192.168.1.103] (really [213.47.196.20]) by viefep20-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.6.01.04.04 201-2131-118-104-20050224) with ESMTP id <20060113145844.QSUG24926.viefep20-int.chello.at@[192.168.1.103]> for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:58:44 +0100 Message-ID: <43C7C009.9030404@ion.lu> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:58:17 +0100 From: David Raison User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051014) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <43C6B630.9090307@ion.lu> In-Reply-To: <43C6B630.9090307@ion.lu> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.92.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: subversion looking for libmysqlclient_r in the wrong path? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:58:50 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ok, I take it you people don't like my question? Could you then be so kind and tell me to post my message to the bugs mailinglist or simply tell me to stfw. Simply some feedback would be very appreciated! David David Raison wrote: > Hi folks, > > This is my first post to this mailing list, so please be kind :) > > I've tried installing subversion, but at some point of the > compilation, I got an error message like: > > /usr/sbin/ld: cannot find -lmysqlclient_r > > I did a little research on the net and looked at gcc's output which > stated that it was looking for the library in /usr/local/lib > instead of /usr/local/lib/mysql, where all of the mysql librairies > are. So I fixed the problem by symlinking the librairie into > /usr/local/lib and subversion compiled alright. > > Now my question is.. (finally :) ) is that a bug with subversion or > have I done something wrong during a portinstall process? Has > somebody experienced the same kind of problem? > > cheers, David > _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" !DSPAM:43c6b698610707916818953! -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDx8AJ/sLffsMilEkRAtXmAJ4n8Z5HN4TFLDEF3WQHTmUS2UGOiQCfW4Lx BXAOZOgIdJOC/5hLDNqCzyU= =PyqR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 15:00:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1ABA616A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:00:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from offbyone@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp14.wanadoo.fr (smtp14.wanadoo.fr [193.252.23.69]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F2DF43D69 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:00:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from offbyone@xs4all.nl) Received: from me-wanadoo.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mwinf1401.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id B3F4C70000E9 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:00:02 +0100 (CET) Received: from [192.168.0.4] (ADijon-151-1-28-66.w83-194.abo.wanadoo.fr [83.194.124.66]) by mwinf1401.wanadoo.fr (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 5299A7000087; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:00:02 +0100 (CET) X-ME-UUID: 20060113150002338.5299A7000087@mwinf1401.wanadoo.fr Message-ID: <43C7BDFC.6040106@xs4all.nl> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:49:32 +0100 From: offbyone User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20060109) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Andrew P." References: <43C78D52.60301@xs4all.nl> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: XFree86 on FreeBSD 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:00:15 -0000 Andrew P. wrote: > On 1/13/06, offbyone wrote: > >>My problem: >>Running FreeBSD_5.4-RELEASE with XFree86-4.5.0, there is a mis-match: >>the underlying o.s. and newly installed and upgraded ports expect X.org >>After portupgrade of an X-supported port, this mis-match shows up as >>"stale dependency(ies)" It's a bore repeatedly to point new and upgraded >> ports to XFree86-libraries-4.5.0, etc. (and there is no XFree86 >>component that corresponds directly to X.org-TrueType, or is there?) >>My questions: >>0.) How to change the underlying o.s. default expectation to XFree86 AND >> is this a good idea for the present and future of 5.x? > > > Look at /usr/local/etc/pkgtools.conf > > >>1.) Is a better solution to bite the bullet, deinstall all XFree86 >>components and install X.org, since FreeBDS is 5.x? > > > Sure. There's no debate about it whatsoever. You are also > avdised to bite another bullet and upgrade to FreeBSD 6, > it's a painless/seamless procedure now. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > Andrew P. - Thanks for the reminder about pkgtools.conf. But about FreeBSD 6... I still see a lot of complaints of headaches from people using 6, here and on the -Stable mailing list, so I'm dubious. - Jake From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 15:00:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2D5C16A429 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:00:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from smtpauth01.mail.atl.earthlink.net (smtpauth01.mail.atl.earthlink.net [209.86.89.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A98B43D68 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:00:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from [206.255.31.21] (helo=grokwell.org) by smtpauth01.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.34) id 1ExQPr-00016H-PE for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:00:36 -0500 Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:00:42 -0600 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060113090042.6ed4aefc@grokwell.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.100 (GTK+ 2.8.9; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69563f9fea00a6dd62bc5e3d64221e68b66f398b66c8ed9b9a17350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 206.255.31.21 Subject: cups at bootup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:00:38 -0000 After a complete system and port upgrade, cups does not start at bootup. During bootup, I see the following line: Usage: cups {reload|restart|start|status|stop} The command 'ps ax | grep cups' returns nothing. If I start cups as root manually ('/usr/local/etc/rc.d/cups.sh start'), the cupsd scheduler is started successfully and I can print. Where should I look for the problem during bootup? Thanks, Andrew Gould From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 15:09:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2BEC16A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:09:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from hermes2.cf.ac.uk (hermes2.cf.ac.uk [131.251.0.113]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CB7B43D46 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:09:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrir.insrv.cf.ac.uk ([131.251.50.213]) by hermes2.cf.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ExQYg-0002Fr-8b; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:09:42 +0000 In-Reply-To: <06D1CA39-54B8-4B7A-96D9-6B8A8C652C6E@submonkey.net> References: <06D1CA39-54B8-4B7A-96D9-6B8A8C652C6E@submonkey.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-9--56012038" Message-Id: <09F546E8-8596-4319-8CCD-6F3A402AB45B@submonkey.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ceri Davies Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:09:37 +0000 To: Ceri Davies X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.1 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) X-Virus-Scanned: Cardiff University Sophos AV Cc: Michael Zimmer , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: defaultroute not loading X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:09:43 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-9--56012038 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On 13 Jan 2006, at 12:49, Ceri Davies wrote: > > On 12 Jan 2006, at 23:37, Michael Zimmer wrote: > >> >> I just updated a i386 gateway to 6.0-STABLE - using my backed-up >> versions [from 5.1] of: >> >> rc.conf >> rc.firewall >> rc.resume >> rc.sendmail >> rc.shutdown >> rc.subr >> rc.suspend >> resolv.conf >> sysctl.conf >> ipnat.rules >> ipf.rules >> >> ...and the default route won't load on boot, although it is >> specified >> in rc.conf (replace all non-comment #'s and 1.2.3.4 with >> appropriate >> numbers....) >> >> hostname="#####.com" >> defaultrouter=1.2.3.4 # previously "1.2.3.4"; >> removed >> > Could you post the output of "sh -x /etc/rc.d/routing start"? > Please try to resist editing it too. > > Is this working for anyone on 6.0-STABLE? I don't see anywhere > in /etc where the default route is actually installed. Ignore me, there's nothing wrong. At least not with FreeBSD... :-/ Ceri --Apple-Mail-9--56012038 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDx8K1me8yCsQvJJ0RAqtvAJ4jn6oR0cMB/cPd27/1DcCKdqswHACbB7aw T9oehM7dnvmv3OXhJ9k2FhY= =9Wau -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-9--56012038-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 15:26:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E681716A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:26:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: from lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (mail.bathnetworks.com [84.92.24.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0A4543D4C for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:26:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: (qmail 32041 invoked by uid 510); 13 Jan 2006 15:30:02 +0000 Received: from 84.92.24.252 by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (envelope-from , uid 508) with qmail-scanner-1.24-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.87/1146. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.24-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-3.8/5.0):. Processed in 1.107371 secs); 13 Jan 2006 15:30:02 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.8 required=5.0 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: bsd@bathnetworks.com via lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.24-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-3.8/5.0):. Processed in 1.107371 secs Process 32016) Received: from mail.bathnetworks.com (HELO ?84.92.24.252?) (bsd@bathnetworks.com@84.92.24.252) by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk with SMTP; 13 Jan 2006 15:30:01 +0000 From: Robert Slade To: "Andrew L. Gould" In-Reply-To: <20060113090042.6ed4aefc@grokwell.org> References: <20060113090042.6ed4aefc@grokwell.org> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1137166200.28855.65.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:30:01 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: cups at bootup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:26:35 -0000 On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 15:00, Andrew L. Gould wrote: > After a complete system and port upgrade, cups does not start at > bootup. During bootup, I see the following line: > > Usage: cups {reload|restart|start|status|stop} > > The command 'ps ax | grep cups' returns nothing. If I start cups as > root manually ('/usr/local/etc/rc.d/cups.sh start'), the cupsd > scheduler is started successfully and I can print. > > Where should I look for the problem during bootup? > > Thanks, > > Andrew Gould Check the cups entry in /etc/rc.conf Rob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 15:52:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FEB516A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:52:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAD0B43D45 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:52:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id l1so598872nzf for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 07:52:21 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=gDO/AEyKFON40h5nP0ziZ1ULpkhzP9jMBPbRwy7WANyzhulsFeadHf8FFLb9X7gfdV6TejUWCqQnk0K0B5Isd8DvloW85gaEpN+qcIen7YVexJhXeYtc7iV5PxOubOGt0yO7NYnmgLhxqnSCA//O6TzbvOtqiXCQSha5AeDiQj4= Received: by 10.36.22.15 with SMTP id 15mr2727632nzv; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 07:52:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.20.67 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 07:52:21 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:52:21 +0300 From: "Andrew P." To: offbyone In-Reply-To: <43C7BDFC.6040106@xs4all.nl> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <43C78D52.60301@xs4all.nl> <43C7BDFC.6040106@xs4all.nl> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: XFree86 on FreeBSD 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:52:22 -0000 On 1/13/06, offbyone wrote: > > Andrew P. - > Thanks for the reminder about pkgtools.conf. > But about FreeBSD 6... > I still see a lot of complaints of headaches from people using 6, here > and on the -Stable mailing list, so I'm dubious. The -stable mailing list has a purpose of diminishing the dubiousness, yet it has an opposite effect on some people. If you really feel uncertain because of it, I'd advise to unsubcribe. Besides, I'm not asking you to run -current or -stable and help community with any precious input. I just say that there was enough effort to make 6.0-RELEASE a better thing to run for almost all of us. My $.02 as always. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 15:54:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 991CB16A420 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:54:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from veldy@veldy.net) Received: from fuggle.veldy.net (fuggle.veldy.net [209.240.64.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0E4043D48 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:54:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from veldy@veldy.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fuggle.veldy.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA8A5C21D for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:54:35 -0600 (CST) Received: from fuggle.veldy.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (fuggle.veldy.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04455-07 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:54:33 -0600 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fuggle.veldy.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17C22C21B for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:54:32 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <43C7CD38.7010207@veldy.net> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:54:32 -0600 From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at veldy.net Subject: What does this message mean (watchdog timeout DC0)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:54:37 -0000 I am seeing the following in my security logs. Can anybody tell me what this means? Perhaps I should consider a new NIC? +dc0: watchdog timeout +dc0: link state changed to DOWN +dc0: link state changed to UP Thanks in advance, Tom Veldhouse From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 16:03:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AD7616A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:03:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from smtpauth07.mail.atl.earthlink.net (smtpauth07.mail.atl.earthlink.net [209.86.89.67]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25B0543D45 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:03:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from [206.255.31.21] (helo=grokwell.org) by smtpauth07.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.34) id 1ExROp-0006dP-7D; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:03:35 -0500 Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:03:43 -0600 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: Robert Slade Message-ID: <20060113100343.72346c14@grokwell.org> In-Reply-To: <1137166200.28855.65.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> References: <20060113090042.6ed4aefc@grokwell.org> <1137166200.28855.65.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.100 (GTK+ 2.8.9; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69563f9fea00a6dd62bc0eb82d1358c050a9bfb7e9675f862d3f350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 206.255.31.21 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cups at bootup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:03:36 -0000 On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:30:01 +0000 Robert Slade wrote: > On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 15:00, Andrew L. Gould wrote: > > After a complete system and port upgrade, cups does not start at > > bootup. During bootup, I see the following line: > > > > Usage: cups {reload|restart|start|status|stop} > > > > The command 'ps ax | grep cups' returns nothing. If I start cups as > > root manually ('/usr/local/etc/rc.d/cups.sh start'), the cupsd > > scheduler is started successfully and I can print. > > > > Where should I look for the problem during bootup? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Andrew Gould > > Check the cups entry in /etc/rc.conf > > Rob > Okay, I have 'cupsd_enable="YES"' in /etc/rc.conf, and cups starts at bootup; but in addition to "cups: started scheduler", I still get the message mentioned above. The "cups: started scheduler" message appears after "Local package initialization:". The "Usage: cups {reload|restart|start|status|stop}" message appears after "Starting usbd." and "Starting ddclient.", but prior to "Local package initialization:". '"Curiouser and curiouser," said Alice' Andrew Gould From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 16:51:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AA3316A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:51:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from coredumped@coredumped.org.ru) Received: from plus.ru (relay.plus.ru [82.179.192.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1A9D43D45 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:51:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from coredumped@coredumped.org.ru) Received: from [83.237.44.65] (account coredumped@coredumped.org.ru HELO [192.168.1.2]) by plus.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.9) with ESMTP-TLS id 71432500; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:51:08 +0300 Message-ID: <43C7DA71.5080609@coredumped.org.ru> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:50:57 +0300 From: Eugeny Kuzakov User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051220) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maksim Yevmenkin References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kbdmux: unable to work with dual keyboard X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:51:04 -0000 Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: >>3. shell script (from man kbdcontrol): >> >>kbdcontrol -K < /dev/console >>kbdcontrol -a /dev/ukbd0 < /dev/kbdmux0 >>kbdcontrol -a /dev/atkbd0 < /dev/kbdmux0 >>kbdcontrol -k /dev/kbdmux0 < /dev/console >> >> > >please read the man page carefully. you should use > >kbdcontrol -a ukbd0 < /dev/kbdmux0 >kbdcontrol -a atkbd0 < /dev/kbdmux0 > > I have tried that as you said: kbdcontrol -K < /dev/console kbdcontrol -a ukbd0 < /dev/kbdmux0 kbdcontrol -a atkbd0 < /dev/kbdmux0 kbdcontrol -k /dev/kbdmux0 < /dev/console output below(it's same) sh -x: ---13-01-2006 19:49:11 coredumped@coredumped:~/tmp$cat mmm.log + kbdcontrol -K kbd0 atkbd0, type:AT 101/102 (2) + kbdcontrol -a ukbd0 kbdcontrol: unable to (un)mux the keyboard: Operation not supported by device kbd1 kbdmux0, type:AT 101/102 (2) + kbdcontrol -a atkbd0 kbdcontrol: unable to (un)mux the keyboard: Operation not supported by device kbd1 kbdmux0, type:AT 101/102 (2) + kbdcontrol -k /dev/kbdmux0 kbd1 kbdmux0, type:AT 101/102 (2) ---13-01-2006 19:49:31 thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 16:52:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F83216A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:52:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: from lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (mail.bathnetworks.com [84.92.24.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12E6243D5D for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:52:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: (qmail 515 invoked by uid 510); 13 Jan 2006 16:55:52 +0000 Received: from 84.92.24.252 by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (envelope-from , uid 508) with qmail-scanner-1.24-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.87/1146. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.24-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-3.9/5.0):. Processed in 2.311598 secs); 13 Jan 2006 16:55:52 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.9 required=5.0 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: bsd@bathnetworks.com via lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.24-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-3.9/5.0):. Processed in 2.311598 secs Process 508) Received: from mail.bathnetworks.com (HELO ?84.92.24.252?) (bsd@bathnetworks.com@84.92.24.252) by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk with SMTP; 13 Jan 2006 16:55:50 +0000 From: Robert Slade To: "Andrew L. Gould" In-Reply-To: <20060113100343.72346c14@grokwell.org> References: <20060113090042.6ed4aefc@grokwell.org> <1137166200.28855.65.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> <20060113100343.72346c14@grokwell.org> Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1137171350.32064.1.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:55:50 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: cups at bootup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:52:25 -0000 On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 16:03, Andrew L. Gould wrote: > On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:30:01 +0000 > Robert Slade wrote: > > > On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 15:00, Andrew L. Gould wrote: > > > After a complete system and port upgrade, cups does not start at > > > bootup. During bootup, I see the following line: > > > > > > Usage: cups {reload|restart|start|status|stop} > > > > > > The command 'ps ax | grep cups' returns nothing. If I start cups as > > > root manually ('/usr/local/etc/rc.d/cups.sh start'), the cupsd > > > scheduler is started successfully and I can print. > > > > > > Where should I look for the problem during bootup? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Andrew Gould > > > > Check the cups entry in /etc/rc.conf > > > > Rob > > > > Okay, I have 'cupsd_enable="YES"' in /etc/rc.conf, and cups starts at > bootup; but in addition to "cups: started scheduler", I still get the > message mentioned above. > > The "cups: started scheduler" message appears after "Local package > initialization:". > > The "Usage: cups {reload|restart|start|status|stop}" message appears > after "Starting usbd." and "Starting ddclient.", but prior to "Local > package initialization:". > > '"Curiouser and curiouser," said Alice' > > Andrew Gould Andrew, I think the entry in /etc/rc.conf should be cups_enable="YES" rather than cupsd. Rob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 16:53:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AF7F16A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:53:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drakyri@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com (bay102-f37.bay102.hotmail.com [64.4.61.47]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97D3243D5E for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:52:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from drakyri@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 08:52:59 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 64.4.61.200 by by102fd.bay102.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:52:59 GMT X-Originating-IP: [66.7.35.250] X-Originating-Email: [drakyri@hotmail.com] X-Sender: drakyri@hotmail.com In-Reply-To: <09F546E8-8596-4319-8CCD-6F3A402AB45B@submonkey.net> From: "Michael Zimmer" To: ceri@submonkey.net Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:52:59 +0000 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jan 2006 16:52:59.0408 (UTC) FILETIME=[CF37E900:01C61861] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: defaultroute not loading X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:53:00 -0000 When I got in this morning I reinstalled base/doc/man/ports from the 6.0 CD and ... suddenly it seems to be working. I don't really understand why, but I'm in no position to complain. : ) Thanks for your help, everyone. _________________________________________________________________ From: Ceri Davies To: Ceri Davies CC: Michael Zimmer , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: defaultroute not loading Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:09:37 +0000 > >On 13 Jan 2006, at 12:49, Ceri Davies wrote: > >> >>On 12 Jan 2006, at 23:37, Michael Zimmer wrote: >> >>> >>> I just updated a i386 gateway to 6.0-STABLE - using my >>>backed-up >>> versions [from 5.1] of: >>> >>> rc.conf >>> rc.firewall >>> rc.resume >>> rc.sendmail >>> rc.shutdown >>> rc.subr >>> rc.suspend >>> resolv.conf >>> sysctl.conf >>> ipnat.rules >>> ipf.rules >>> >>> ...and the default route won't load on boot, although it is >>>specified >>> in rc.conf (replace all non-comment #'s and 1.2.3.4 with >>>appropriate >>> numbers....) >>> >>> hostname="#####.com" >>> defaultrouter=1.2.3.4 # previously "1.2.3.4"; >>>removed >>> >>Could you post the output of "sh -x /etc/rc.d/routing start"? >>Please try to resist editing it too. >> >>Is this working for anyone on 6.0-STABLE? I don't see anywhere >>in /etc where the default route is actually installed. > >Ignore me, there's nothing wrong. At least not with FreeBSD... :-/ > >Ceri > ><< PGP.sig >> From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 17:02:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 645) id C76F216A422; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:02:00 +0000 (GMT) To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20060113170200.C76F216A422@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:02:00 +0000 (GMT) From: grog@FreeBSD.ORG (Greg Lehey) Cc: Subject: How to get best results from FreeBSD-questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:02:00 -0000 How to get the best results from FreeBSD questions. =================================================== Last update $Date: 2005/08/10 02:21:44 $ This is a regular posting to the FreeBSD questions mailing list. If you got it in answer to a message you sent, it means that the sender thinks that at least one of the following things was wrong with your message: - You left out a subject line, or the subject line was not appropriate. - You formatted it in such a way that it was difficult to read. - You asked more than one unrelated question in one message. - You sent out a message with an incorrect date, time or time zone. - You sent out the same message more than once. - You sent an 'unsubscribe' message to FreeBSD-questions. If you have done any of these things, there is a good chance that you will get more than one copy of this message from different people. Read on, and your next message will be more successful. This document is also available on the web at http://www.lemis.com/questions.html. ===================================================================== Contents: I: Introduction II: How to unsubscribe from FreeBSD-questions III: Should I ask -questions or -hackers? IV: How to submit a question to FreeBSD-questions V: How to answer a question to FreeBSD-questions I: Introduction =============== This is a regular posting aimed to help both those seeking advice from FreeBSD-questions (the "newcomers"), and also those who answer the questions (the "hackers"). Note that the term "hacker" has nothing to do with breaking into other people's computers. The correct term for the latter activity is "cracker", but the popular press hasn't found out yet. The FreeBSD hackers disapprove strongly of cracking security, and have nothing to do with it. In the past, there has been some friction which stems from the different viewpoints of the two groups. The newcomers accused the hackers of being arrogant, stuck-up, and unhelpful, while the hackers accused the newcomers of being stupid, unable to read plain English, and expecting everything to be handed to them on a silver platter. Of course, there's an element of truth in both these claims, but for the most part these viewpoints come from a sense of frustration. In this document, I'd like to do something to relieve this frustration and help everybody get better results from FreeBSD-questions. In the following section, I recommend how to submit a question; after that, we'll look at how to answer one. II: How to unsubscribe from FreeBSD-questions ============================================== When you subscribed to FreeBSD-questions, you got a welcome message from freebsd-questions-request@FreeBSD.ORG. In this message, amongst other things, it told you how to unsubscribe. Here's a typical message: Welcome to the freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list! If you ever want to unsubscribe or change your options (eg, switch to or from digest mode, change your password, etc.), visit your subscription page at: http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions/me@me.org (obviously, substitute your mail address for "me@me.org"). You can also make such adjustments via email by sending a message to: freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org with the word 'help' in the subject or body (don't include the quotes), and you will get back a message with instructions. You must know your password to change your options (including changing the password, itself) or to unsubscribe. Normally, Mailman will remind you of your freebsd.org mailing list passwords once every month, although you can disable this if you prefer. This reminder will also include instructions on how to unsubscribe or change your account options. There is also a button on your options page that will email your current password to you. Here's the general information for the list you've subscribed to, in case you don't already have it: FREEBSD-QUESTIONS User questions This is the mailing list for questions about FreeBSD. You should not send "how to" questions to the technical lists unless you consider the question to be pretty technical. Normally, unsubscribing is even simpler than the message suggests: you don't need to specify your mail ID unless it is different from the one which you specified when you subscribed. If Majordomo replies and tells you (incorrectly) that you're not on the list, this may mean one of two things: 1. You have changed your mail ID since you subscribed. That's where keeping the original message from majordomo comes in handy. For example, the sample message above shows my mail ID as grog@lemis.de. Since then, I have changed it to grog@lemis.com. If I were to try to remove grog@lemis.com from the list, it would fail: I would have to specify the name with which I joined. 2. You're subscribed to a mailing list which is subscribed to FreeBSD-questions. If that's the case, you'll have to figure out which one it is and get your name taken off that one. If you're not sure which one it might be, check the headers of the messages you receive from freebsd-questions: maybe there's a clue there. If you've done all this, and you still can't figure out what's going on, send a message to Postmaster@FreeBSD.org, and he will sort things out for you. Don't send a message to FreeBSD-questions: they can't help you. III: Should I ask -questions or -hackers? ========================================= Two mailing lists handle general questions about FreeBSD, FreeBSD-questions and FreeBSD-hackers. In some cases, it's not really clear which group you should ask. The following criteria should help for 99% of all questions, however: If the question is of a general nature, first check whether this isn't a Frequently Asked Question (FAQ). There's a list of these questions at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/index.html, and also on your own system (once you've installed it) at /usr/share/doc/en/books/faq/index.html. Check there, and if you don't find an answer, ask FreeBSD-questions. Examples might be questions about installing FreeBSD or the use of a particular UNIX utility. If you think the question relates to a bug, but you're not sure, or you don't know how to look for it, send the message to FreeBSD-questions. If the question relates to a bug, and you're almost sure that it's a bug (for example, you can pinpoint the place in the code where it happens, and you maybe have a fix), then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. You should also enter a problem report with the send-pr utility. If the question relates to enhancements to FreeBSD, and you can make suggestions about how to implement them, then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. If the question is of particularly technical nature, such as implementation details or suggestions for improvements, then send the message to FreeBSD-hackers. There are also a number of other specialized mailing lists, for example FreeBSD-isp, which caters to the interests of ISPs (Internet Service Providers) who run FreeBSD. If you happen to be an ISP, this doesn't mean you should automatically send your questions to FreeBSD-isp. The criteria above still apply, and it's in your interest to stick to them, since you're more likely to get good results that way. IV: How to submit a question ============================= When submitting a question to FreeBSD-questions, consider the following points: 1. Remember that nobody gets paid for answering a FreeBSD question. They do it of their own free will. You can influence this free will positively by submitting a well-formulated question supplying as much relevant information as possible. You can influence this free will negatively by submitting an incomplete, illegible, or rude question. It's perfectly possible to send a message to FreeBSD-questions and not get an answer even if you follow these rules. It's much more possible to not get an answer if you don't. In the rest of this document, we'll look at how to get the most out of your question to FreeBSD-questions. 2. Not everybody who answers FreeBSD questions reads every message: they look at the subject line and decide whether it interests them. Clearly, it's in your interest to specify a subject. ``FreeBSD problem'' or ``Help'' aren't enough. If you provide no subject at all, many people won't bother reading it. If your subject isn't specific enough, the people who can answer it may not read it. 3. When sending a new message, well, send a new message. Don't reply to some other message, erase the old content and change the subject line. That leaves an In-reply-to: header which many mail readers use to thread messages, so your message shows up as a reply to some other message. People often delete messages a whole thread at a time, so apart from irritating people, you also run a chance of having the message deleted unread. 4. Format your message so that it is legible, and PLEASE DON'T SHOUT!!!!!. We appreciate that a lot of people don't speak English as their first language, and we try to make allowances for that, but it's really painful to try to read a message written full of typos or without any line breaks. A lot of badly formatted messages come from bad mailers or badly configured mailers. The following mailers are known to send out badly formatted messages without you finding out about them: Eudora exmh Microsoft Exchange Microsoft Internet Mail Microsoft Outlook Netscape As you can see, the mailers in the Microsoft world are frequent offenders. If at all possible, use a UNIX mailer. If you must use a mailer under Microsoft environments, make sure it is set up correctly. Try not to use MIME: a lot of people use mailers which don't get on very well with MIME. For further information on this subject, check out http://www.lemis.com/email.html. 5. Make sure your time and time zone are set correctly. This may seem a little silly, since your message still gets there, but many of the people you are trying to reach get several hundred messages a day. They frequently sort the incoming messages by subject and by date, and if your message doesn't come before the first answer, they may assume they missed it and not bother to look. 6. Don't include unrelated questions in the same message. Firstly, a long message tends to scare people off, and secondly, it's more difficult to get all the people who can answer all the questions to read the message. 7. Specify as much information as possible. This is a difficult area, and we need to expand on what information you need to submit, but here's a start: If you get error messages, don't say ``I get error messages'', say (for example) ``I get the error message 'No route to host'''. If your system panics, don't say ``My system panicked'', say (for example) ``my system panicked with the message 'free vnode isn't'''. If you have difficulty installing FreeBSD, please tell us what hardware you have. In particular, it's important to know the IRQs and I/O addresses of the boards installed in your machine. If you have difficulty getting PPP to run, describe the configuration. Which version of PPP do you use? What kind of authentication do you have? Do you have a static or dynamic IP address? What kind of messages do you get in the log file? 8. If you don't get an answer immediately, or if you don't even see your own message appear on the list immediately, don't resend the message. Wait at least 24 hours. The FreeBSD mailer offloads messages to a number of subordinate mailers around the world, and sometimes it can take several hours for the mail to get through. And once it gets through, the one person who might know the answer will probably just have gone to bed in his part of the world. 9. If you do all this, and you still don't get an answer, there could be other reasons. For example, the problem is so complicated that nobody knows the answer, or the person who does know the answer was offline. If you don't get an answer after, say, a week, it might help to re-send the message. If you don't get an answer to your second message, though, you're probably not going to get one from this forum. Resending the same message again and again will only make you unpopular. To summarize, let's assume you know the answer to the following question (yes, it's the same one in each case :-). You choose which of these two questions you would be more prepared to answer: Message 1: Subject: (none) I just can't get hits damn silly FereBSD system to workd, and Im really good at this tsuff, but I have never seen anythign sho difficult to install, it jst wont work whatever I try so why don't y9ou guys tell me what I doing wrong. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Message 2: Subject: Problems installing FreeBSD I've just got the FreeBSD 2.1.5 CD-ROM from Walnut Creek, and I'm having a lot of difficulty installing it. I have a 66 MHz 486 with 16 MB of memory and an Adaptec 1540A SCSI board, a 1.2GB Quantum Fireball disk and a Toshiba 3501XA CD-ROM drive. The installation works just fine, but when I try to reboot the system, I get the message "Missing Operating System". ---------------------------------------------------------------------- V: How to follow up to a question ================================= Often you will want to send in additional information to a question you have already sent. The best way to do this is to reply to your original message. This has three advantages: 1. You include the original message text, so people will know what you're talking about. Don't forget to trim unnecessary text out, though. 2. The text in the subject line stays the same (you did remember to put one in, didn't you?). Many mailers will sort messages by subject. This helps group messages together. 3. The message reference numbers in the header will refer to the previous message. Some mailers, such as mutt, can thread messages, showing the exact relationships between the messages. VI: How to answer a question ============================ Before you answer a question to FreeBSD-questions, consider: 1. A lot of the points on submitting questions also apply to answering questions. Read them. 2. Has somebody already answered the question? The easiest way to check this is to sort your incoming mail by subject: then (hopefully) you'll see the question followed by any answers, all together. If somebody has already answered it, it doesn't automatically mean that you shouldn't send another answer. But it makes sense to read all the other answers first. 3. Do you have something to contribute beyond what has already been said? In general, "Yeah, me too" answers don't help much, although there are exceptions, like when somebody is describing a problem he's having, and he doesn't know whether it's his fault or whether there's something wrong with the hardware or software. If you do send a "me too" answer, you should also include any further relevant information. 4. Are you sure you understand the question? Very frequently, the person who asks the question is confused or doesn't express himself very well. Even with the best understanding of the system, it's easy to send a reply which doesn't answer the question. This doesn't help: you'll leave the person who submitted the question more frustrated or confused than ever. If nobody else answers, and you're not too sure either, you can always ask for more information. 5. Are you sure your answer is correct? If not, wait a day or so. If nobody else comes up with a better answer, you can still reply and say, for example, "I don't know if this is correct, but since nobody else has replied, why don't you try replacing your ATAPI CD-ROM with a frog?". 6. Unless there's a good reason to do otherwise, reply to the sender and to FreeBSD-questions. Many people on the FreeBSD-questions are "lurkers": they learn by reading messages sent and replied to by others. If you take a message which is of general interest off the list, you're depriving these people of their information. Be careful with group replies; lots of people send messages with hundreds of CCs. If this is the case, be sure to trim the Cc: lines appropriately. 7. Include relevant text from the original message. Trim it to the minimum, but don't overdo it. It should still be possible for somebody who didn't read the original message to understand what you're talking about. 8. Use some technique to identify which text came from the original message, and which text you add. I personally find that prepending ``> '' to the original message works best. Leaving white space after the ``> '' and leave empty lines between your text and the original text both make the result more readable. 9. Put your response in the correct place (after the text to which it replies). It's very difficult to read a thread of responses where each reply comes before the text to which it replies. 10. Most mailers change the subject line on a reply by prepending a text such as ``Re: ''. If your mailer doesn't do it automatically, you should do it manually. 11. If the submitter didn't abide by format conventions (lines too long, inappropriate subject line), please fix it. In the case of an incorrect subject line (such as ``HELP!!??''), change the subject line to (say) ``Re: Difficulties with sync PPP (was: HELP!!??)''. That way other people trying to follow the thread will have less difficulty following it. In such cases, it's appropriate to say what you did and why you did it, but try not to be rude. If you find you can't answer without being rude, don't answer. If you just want to reply to a message because of its bad format, just reply to the submitter, not to the list. You can just send him this message in reply, if you like. $Id: Howto-ask-questions,v 1.6 2005/08/10 02:21:44 grog Exp $ _______________________________________________ Thanks to Josh Paetzel for updating this document to describe mailman. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 17:02:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 645) id CDE4E16A423; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:02:00 +0000 (GMT) To: FreeBSD-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-Id: <20060113170200.CDE4E16A423@hub.freebsd.org> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:02:00 +0000 (GMT) From: grog@FreeBSD.ORG (Greg Lehey) Cc: Subject: "The Complete FreeBSD": errata and addenda X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:02:01 -0000 The trouble with books is that you can't update them the way you can a web page or any other online documentation. The result is that most leading edge computer books are out of date almost before they are printed. Unfortunately, The Complete FreeBSD, published by O'Reilly, is no exception. Inevitably, a number of bugs and changes have surfaced. "The Complete FreeBSD" has been through a total of five editions, including its predecessor "Installing and Running FreeBSD". Two of these have been reprinted with corrections. I maintain a series of errata pages. Start at http://www.lemis.com/errata-4.html to find out how to get the errata information. Have you found a problem with the book, or maybe something confusing? Please let me know: I'm constantly updating it. Greg From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 17:03:41 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC33716A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:03:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from smtpauth02.mail.atl.earthlink.net (smtpauth02.mail.atl.earthlink.net [209.86.89.62]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2291E43D66 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:03:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from algould@datawok.com) Received: from [206.255.31.21] (helo=grokwell.org) by smtpauth02.mail.atl.earthlink.net with asmtp (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.34) id 1ExSKh-0000uu-0g; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:03:23 -0500 Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:03:29 -0600 From: "Andrew L. Gould" To: Robert Slade Message-ID: <20060113110329.7685bdae@grokwell.org> In-Reply-To: <1137171350.32064.1.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> References: <20060113090042.6ed4aefc@grokwell.org> <1137166200.28855.65.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> <20060113100343.72346c14@grokwell.org> <1137171350.32064.1.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.100 (GTK+ 2.8.9; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ELNK-Trace: ee791d459e3d6817d780f4a490ca69563f9fea00a6dd62bc31761960234761cbb6658b16b69d3293350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 206.255.31.21 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: cups at bootup X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:03:41 -0000 On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:55:50 +0000 Robert Slade wrote: > On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 16:03, Andrew L. Gould wrote: > > On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:30:01 +0000 > > Robert Slade wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 15:00, Andrew L. Gould wrote: > > > > After a complete system and port upgrade, cups does not start at > > > > bootup. During bootup, I see the following line: > > > > > > > > Usage: cups {reload|restart|start|status|stop} > > > > > > > > The command 'ps ax | grep cups' returns nothing. If I start > > > > cups as root manually ('/usr/local/etc/rc.d/cups.sh start'), > > > > the cupsd scheduler is started successfully and I can print. > > > > > > > > Where should I look for the problem during bootup? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > Andrew Gould > > > > > > Check the cups entry in /etc/rc.conf > > > > > > Rob > > > > > > > Okay, I have 'cupsd_enable="YES"' in /etc/rc.conf, and cups starts > > at bootup; but in addition to "cups: started scheduler", I still > > get the message mentioned above. > > > > The "cups: started scheduler" message appears after "Local package > > initialization:". > > > > The "Usage: cups {reload|restart|start|status|stop}" message appears > > after "Starting usbd." and "Starting ddclient.", but prior to "Local > > package initialization:". > > > > '"Curiouser and curiouser," said Alice' > > > > Andrew Gould > > Andrew, > > I think the entry in /etc/rc.conf should be cups_enable="YES" rather > than cupsd. > > Rob > That did it! Much thanks, Andrew Gould From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 17:58:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77C9A16A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:58:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from snarmont@wnec.edu) Received: from eq1.spamarrest.com (eq1.spamarrest.com [66.150.163.134]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 382E343D45 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:58:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from snarmont@wnec.edu) Received: from m11 (m11p [10.1.2.11]) by eq1.spamarrest.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E150360C1F4 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:55:43 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <17821403.1137174943074.JavaMail.root@m11> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:55:42 -0800 (PST) From: Steven Narmontas To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_982_24986631.1137174942886" X-Mailer: Spam Arrest WebMail (http://www.spamarrest.com/) X-Originating-IP: [141.154.140.63] X-Originating-Email: [snarmont@spamarrest.com] X-SA-GROUP: Subject: httpd could not be started X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: snarmont@wnec.edu List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:58:04 -0000 ------=_Part_982_24986631.1137174942886 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I'm entirely new to FreeBSD, but have a fair amount of Linux experience. I installed FreeBSD 6.0 (Production Release) on an oldish i386 system. During the install, I asked to install "ALL". The install went flawlessly. I need Apache on this system for some software development, so I followed these instructions I found at: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports-using.html : # pkg_add -r cvsup-without-gui # cvsup -L 2 -h cvsup.FreeBSD.org /usr/share/examples/cvsup/ports-supfile # cd /usr/ports/www/apache13 # make # make install Everything to this point went smoothly! I edited /usr/local/etc/apache/httpd.conf ONLY to set the ServerName to the IP address of the machine. However, when I try to start apache I get: #/usr/local/sbin/apachectl start /usr/local/sbin/apachectl start: httpd could not be started I can't start apache. Here's a configtest: #/usr/local/sbin/apachectl configtest Syntax OK Apache also won't start if I bypass the apachectl script and start it directly. However it doesn't report any errors either: # /usr/local/sbin/httpd # Everything up above is with a completely fresh install of FreeBSD 6. I didn't mess around with anything on the system. I followed the above steps exactly. (As I side note, I've struggled with this for two days, and have installed FreeBSD at least 6 times trying differnet things. I can't get Apache to start. On previous installs, I tried using apache22 with the same results.) Does anyone have any suggestions on how to get ANY version of Apache running on a new install of FreeBSD 6? Thanks, Steven Narmontas ------=_Part_982_24986631.1137174942886-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 18:05:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF5D416A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:05:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kiffin.gish@planet.nl) Received: from post-22.mail.nl.demon.net (post-22.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5694E43D45 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:05:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kiffin.gish@planet.nl) Received: from gish.demon.nl ([83.160.27.223]:25440 helo=[192.168.1.33]) by post-22.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1ExTJA-000Dwz-0S; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:05:52 +0000 From: Kiffin Gish To: snarmont@wnec.edu In-Reply-To: <17821403.1137174943074.JavaMail.root@m11> References: <17821403.1137174943074.JavaMail.root@m11> Content-Type: text/plain Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:05:52 +0100 Message-Id: <1137175552.794.2.camel@localhost> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: httpd could not be started X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:05:53 -0000 On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 09:55 -0800, Steven Narmontas wrote: > I'm entirely new to FreeBSD, but have a fair amount of Linux > experience. > > I installed FreeBSD 6.0 (Production Release) on an oldish i386 > system. During the install, I asked to install "ALL". The > install went flawlessly. > > I need Apache on this system for some software development, so I > followed these instructions I found at: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports-using.html > : > > # pkg_add -r cvsup-without-gui > # cvsup -L 2 -h cvsup.FreeBSD.org > /usr/share/examples/cvsup/ports-supfile > # cd /usr/ports/www/apache13 > # make > # make install > > Everything to this point went smoothly! I edited > /usr/local/etc/apache/httpd.conf ONLY to set the ServerName to the > IP address of the machine. However, when I try to start apache I > get: > > #/usr/local/sbin/apachectl start > /usr/local/sbin/apachectl start: httpd could not be started > Maybe httpd-error.log contains some suspicious-looking error messages? [snip] -- Kiffin Gish From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 18:10:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E47FF16A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:10:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: from mail.el.net (mail.el.net [68.165.89.91]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 349F043D46 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:10:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kalin@el.net) Received: (qmail 30000 invoked by uid 1008); 13 Jan 2006 18:11:09 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.el.net) (127.0.0.1) by mail.el.net with SMTP; 13 Jan 2006 18:11:09 -0000 Received: from 24.90.33.115 (SquirrelMail authenticated user kalin@el.net) by mail.el.net with HTTP; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:11:09 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <65296.24.90.33.115.1137175869.squirrel@mail.el.net> In-Reply-To: <17821403.1137174943074.JavaMail.root@m11> References: <17821403.1137174943074.JavaMail.root@m11> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:11:09 -0500 (EST) From: "kalin mintchev" To: snarmont@wnec.edu User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: httpd could not be started X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:10:11 -0000 what does the httpd log say? > I'm entirely new to FreeBSD, but have a fair amount of Linux > experience. > > I installed FreeBSD 6.0 (Production Release) on an oldish i386 > system. During the install, I asked to install "ALL". The > install went flawlessly. > > I need Apache on this system for some software development, so I > followed these instructions I found at: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports-using.html > : > > # pkg_add -r cvsup-without-gui > # cvsup -L 2 -h cvsup.FreeBSD.org > /usr/share/examples/cvsup/ports-supfile > # cd /usr/ports/www/apache13 > # make > # make install > > Everything to this point went smoothly! I edited > /usr/local/etc/apache/httpd.conf ONLY to set the ServerName to the > IP address of the machine. However, when I try to start apache I > get: > > #/usr/local/sbin/apachectl start > /usr/local/sbin/apachectl start: httpd could not be started > > I can't start apache. Here's a configtest: > > #/usr/local/sbin/apachectl configtest > Syntax OK > > > Apache also won't start if I bypass the apachectl script and start > it directly. However it doesn't report any errors either: > > # /usr/local/sbin/httpd > # > > > Everything up above is with a completely fresh install of FreeBSD > 6. I didn't mess around with anything on the system. I followed > the above steps exactly. (As I side note, I've struggled with this > for two days, and have installed FreeBSD at least 6 times trying > differnet things. I can't get Apache to start. On previous > installs, I tried using apache22 with the same results.) > > Does anyone have any suggestions on how to get ANY version of > Apache running on a new install of FreeBSD 6? > > Thanks, > Steven Narmontas > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 18:12:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBE0C16A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:12:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from luke.bakken@gmail.com) Received: from uproxy.gmail.com (uproxy.gmail.com [66.249.92.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D19B343D46 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:12:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from luke.bakken@gmail.com) Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id j3so42875ugf for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:12:05 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=nfDkXSzBSf0woDdBkAZTZkOxLU1siZQ61GpAF24Hyz6AgZXZ0q2+jJYKQZDmnq4tTpF3BQRZxuvPlVEK/1jE1uDuE8m4qOZ2CbzWU8TmnsXvw0Yz4/V5yper3bV5Cf2sTbTMzOopcbzPzqn/1xrzi05e1iXAFdrngfbZtYMMy2k= Received: by 10.49.1.20 with SMTP id d20mr90381nfi; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:12:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.28.15 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:12:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <6acc6ca40601131012u667f9856ude5324c62a75b09c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:12:05 -0800 From: Luke Bakken To: snarmont@wnec.edu In-Reply-To: <17821403.1137174943074.JavaMail.root@m11> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <17821403.1137174943074.JavaMail.root@m11> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: httpd could not be started X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:12:07 -0000 > #/usr/local/sbin/apachectl start > /usr/local/sbin/apachectl start: httpd could not be started > > Apache also won't start if I bypass the apachectl script and start > it directly. However it doesn't report any errors either: Some ideas, I may be off base here: 1. Is there anything being written to the error_log file? 2. Can you start Apache with the -F argument to make it stay in the foreground? Any output there? Luke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 18:23:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52C0B16A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:23:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Received: from mail.scls.lib.wi.us (mail.scls.lib.wi.us [198.150.40.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EAF6A43D45 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:23:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Received: from [172.26.2.238] ([172.26.2.238]) by mail.scls.lib.wi.us (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k0DINlR4022215; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:23:47 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Message-ID: <43C7F032.3020109@scls.lib.wi.us> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:23:46 -0600 From: Greg Barniskis User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: snarmont@wnec.edu References: <17821403.1137174943074.JavaMail.root@m11> In-Reply-To: <17821403.1137174943074.JavaMail.root@m11> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: httpd could not be started X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:23:48 -0000 Steven Narmontas wrote: > I'm entirely new to FreeBSD, but have a fair amount of Linux > experience. > > I installed FreeBSD 6.0 (Production Release) on an oldish i386 > system. During the install, I asked to install "ALL". The > install went flawlessly. > > I need Apache on this system for some software development, so I > followed these instructions I found at: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports-using.html > : > > # pkg_add -r cvsup-without-gui > # cvsup -L 2 -h cvsup.FreeBSD.org > /usr/share/examples/cvsup/ports-supfile > # cd /usr/ports/www/apache13 > # make > # make install > > Everything to this point went smoothly! As well it should have, since you followed correct procedure. =) > I edited > /usr/local/etc/apache/httpd.conf ONLY to set the ServerName to the > IP address of the machine. However, when I try to start apache I > get: > > #/usr/local/sbin/apachectl start > /usr/local/sbin/apachectl start: httpd could not be started [snip] > Does anyone have any suggestions on how to get ANY version of > Apache running on a new install of FreeBSD 6? Apache and most other add-on daemons on FreeBSD require that you explicitly enable them to run in /etc/rc.conf. Have you got a line apache2_enable="YES" in your rc.conf? The need for this as well as the proper syntax should be noted in the file /usr/ports/www/apache2/pkg-msg. For any other port you install there's probably gold nuggets of info in its pkg-msg file. This stuff displays during the make install, but then so does several K of other info so it's not hard to miss these things. -- Greg Barniskis, Computer Systems Integrator South Central Library System (SCLS) Library Interchange Network (LINK) , (608) 266-6348 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 18:48:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16A5516A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:48:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (clunix.cl.msu.edu [35.9.2.10]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4ED243D45 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:48:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jerrymc@clunix.cl.msu.edu) Received: from clunix.cl.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2) with ESMTP id k0DIm2iU027489; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:48:02 -0500 (EST) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by clunix.cl.msu.edu (8.12.10+Sun/8.12.2/Submit) id k0DIm2hE027488; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:48:02 -0500 (EST) From: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <200601131848.k0DIm2hE027488@clunix.cl.msu.edu> To: snarmont@wnec.edu Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:48:02 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <17821403.1137174943074.JavaMail.root@m11> X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.5 PL7] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: httpd could not be started X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:48:04 -0000 > > I'm entirely new to FreeBSD, but have a fair amount of Linux > experience. > > I installed FreeBSD 6.0 (Production Release) on an oldish i386 > system. During the install, I asked to install "ALL". The > install went flawlessly. > > I need Apache on this system for some software development, so I > followed these instructions I found at: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports-using.html > : > > # pkg_add -r cvsup-without-gui > # cvsup -L 2 -h cvsup.FreeBSD.org > /usr/share/examples/cvsup/ports-supfile > # cd /usr/ports/www/apache13 > # make > # make install > > Everything to this point went smoothly! I edited > /usr/local/etc/apache/httpd.conf ONLY to set the ServerName to the > IP address of the machine. However, when I try to start apache I > get: > > #/usr/local/sbin/apachectl start > /usr/local/sbin/apachectl start: httpd could not be started You need to look for error messages in at least two places. One would be the error_log file for apache which may be in: /var/log/httpd-error.log if you did everything in the default way. The other would be the system error log file which is: /var/log/messages again, if you are using defaults. One of those may have a message telling you why it could not be started. Error messages get put in those places because then they are saved for you to check up on later if needed - like the present situation. Generally httpd-error.log will contain error messages for things that go wrong while Apache is running. Messages concerning problems that make it unable to start will most often go in to the system error log - /var/log/messages. If there are no error messages in those files at about the time apache is starting up, then you may need to try and run Apache interactively. ////jerry > > I can't start apache. Here's a configtest: > > #/usr/local/sbin/apachectl configtest > Syntax OK > > > Apache also won't start if I bypass the apachectl script and start > it directly. However it doesn't report any errors either: > > # /usr/local/sbin/httpd > # > > > Everything up above is with a completely fresh install of FreeBSD > 6. I didn't mess around with anything on the system. I followed > the above steps exactly. (As I side note, I've struggled with this > for two days, and have installed FreeBSD at least 6 times trying > differnet things. I can't get Apache to start. On previous > installs, I tried using apache22 with the same results.) > > Does anyone have any suggestions on how to get ANY version of > Apache running on a new install of FreeBSD 6? > > Thanks, > Steven Narmontas > > > > > > > > ------=_Part_982_24986631.1137174942886 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > Content-Disposition: inline > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > ------=_Part_982_24986631.1137174942886-- > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 18:48:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3049516A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:48:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: from smtp2.versatel.nl (smtp2.versatel.nl [62.58.50.89]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6907143D45 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:48:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 11050 invoked by uid 0); 13 Jan 2006 18:48:04 -0000 Received: from ip176-173-59-62.adsl.versatel.nl (HELO [192.168.2.5]) ([62.59.173.176]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp2.versatel.nl (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for < >; 13 Jan 2006 18:48:04 -0000 Message-ID: <43C7F609.3010607@gmx.net> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:48:41 +0100 From: Frank Staals User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20060105) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Barniskis References: <17821403.1137174943074.JavaMail.root@m11> <43C7F032.3020109@scls.lib.wi.us> In-Reply-To: <43C7F032.3020109@scls.lib.wi.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: snarmont@wnec.edu, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: httpd could not be started X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:48:07 -0000 Greg Barniskis wrote: > Steven Narmontas wrote: > >> I'm entirely new to FreeBSD, but have a fair amount of Linux experience. >> >> I installed FreeBSD 6.0 (Production Release) on an oldish i386 >> system. During the install, I asked to install "ALL". The install >> went flawlessly. >> >> I need Apache on this system for some software development, so I >> followed these instructions I found at: >> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/ports-using.html >> : >> >> # pkg_add -r cvsup-without-gui >> # cvsup -L 2 -h cvsup.FreeBSD.org >> /usr/share/examples/cvsup/ports-supfile >> # cd /usr/ports/www/apache13 >> # make >> # make install >> >> Everything to this point went smoothly! > > > As well it should have, since you followed correct procedure. =) > > > I edited > >> /usr/local/etc/apache/httpd.conf ONLY to set the ServerName to the IP >> address of the machine. However, when I try to start apache I get: >> >> #/usr/local/sbin/apachectl start >> /usr/local/sbin/apachectl start: httpd could not be started > > > [snip] > >> Does anyone have any suggestions on how to get ANY version of Apache >> running on a new install of FreeBSD 6? > > > Apache and most other add-on daemons on FreeBSD require that you > explicitly enable them to run in /etc/rc.conf. Have you got a line > > apache2_enable="YES" > > in your rc.conf? > > The need for this as well as the proper syntax should be noted in the > file /usr/ports/www/apache2/pkg-msg. For any other port you install > there's probably gold nuggets of info in its pkg-msg file. This stuff > displays during the make install, but then so does several K of other > info so it's not hard to miss these things. > In fact, it doesn't realy matter if you add apache_enable="YES" to rc.conf ( since het installed apache13 adding apache2_enable="YES" would be quite useless ... ) when you start it manually from commandline, adding it to rc.conf is only usefull when you want to start apache from boot, which can be quite usefull, but it can't be the reason why apache wouldn't start. Try adding '127.0.0.1 localhost' to /etc/hosts that might help. You should also check your apache log ( probably in /var/log/ when at default settings ) for a more detailed message of what went wrong Good luck, -- -Frank Staals From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 18:48:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F22CA16A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:48:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maksim.yevmenkin@gmail.com) Received: from uproxy.gmail.com (uproxy.gmail.com [66.249.92.197]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2138C43D45 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:48:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maksim.yevmenkin@gmail.com) Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id j3so54906ugf for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:48:35 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Da70akHtRKS5ZGvEYdaQ5gpJAI7dEjKAXrIsiB38eAOTgr5eo7nKGDiLc26NkbKh2UsA3kKFXGCdB/0DzOXaxvJUdYCQm1dE++kTXs5Arc5NZajIzqq697jsH9wvlhY4qK895xaAHPkk+8JuBVwCOchEDSSkaEcsoE3tFKhoPYQ= Received: by 10.49.17.20 with SMTP id u20mr81210nfi; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:48:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.4.9 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:48:35 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 09:48:35 -0800 From: Maksim Yevmenkin To: Eugeny Kuzakov In-Reply-To: <43C7DA71.5080609@coredumped.org.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <43C7DA71.5080609@coredumped.org.ru> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kbdmux: unable to work with dual keyboard X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:48:38 -0000 > >>3. shell script (from man kbdcontrol): > >> > >>kbdcontrol -K < /dev/console > >>kbdcontrol -a /dev/ukbd0 < /dev/kbdmux0 > >>kbdcontrol -a /dev/atkbd0 < /dev/kbdmux0 > >>kbdcontrol -k /dev/kbdmux0 < /dev/console > > > >please read the man page carefully. you should use > > > >kbdcontrol -a ukbd0 < /dev/kbdmux0 > >kbdcontrol -a atkbd0 < /dev/kbdmux0 > > I have tried that as you said: > kbdcontrol -K < /dev/console > kbdcontrol -a ukbd0 < /dev/kbdmux0 > kbdcontrol -a atkbd0 < /dev/kbdmux0 > kbdcontrol -k /dev/kbdmux0 < /dev/console > > output below(it's same) sh -x: no, its not the same as in your previous email. you got different error. did you run your script in console or xterm window? also, just to be on the safe side, you might want to replace /dev/console with /dev/ttyv0, i.e. kbdcontrol -K < /dev/ttyv0 kbdcontrol -a ukbd0 < /dev/kbdmux0 kbdcontrol -a atkbd0 < /dev/kbdmux0 kbdcontrol -k /dev/kbdmux0 < /dev/ttyv0 thanks, max From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 18:49:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF99B16A426 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:49:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from snarmont@wnec.edu) Received: from eq1.spamarrest.com (eq1.spamarrest.com [66.150.163.134]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A26EC43D45 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:49:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from snarmont@wnec.edu) Received: from m11 (m11p [10.1.2.11]) by eq1.spamarrest.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22C5560C1FF; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:47:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <32789224.1137178054226.JavaMail.root@m11> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:47:34 -0800 (PST) From: Steven Narmontas To: Kiffin Gish , snarmont@wnec.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_Part_1041_257339.1137178054172" X-Mailer: Spam Arrest WebMail (http://www.spamarrest.com/) X-Originating-IP: [141.154.140.63] X-Originating-Email: [snarmont@spamarrest.com] X-SA-GROUP: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: httpd could not be started X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: snarmont@wnec.edu List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 18:49:54 -0000 ------=_Part_1041_257339.1137178054172 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Fri Jan 13 10:05:52 PST 2006, Kiffin Gish wrote: > On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 09:55 -0800, Steven Narmontas wrote: >> ... >> >> Everything to this point went smoothly! I edited >> /usr/local/etc/apache/httpd.conf ONLY to set the ServerName to >> the IP address of the machine. However, when I try to start >> apache I get: >> >> #/usr/local/sbin/apachectl start >> /usr/local/sbin/apachectl start: httpd could not be started >> > > Maybe httpd-error.log contains some suspicious-looking error > messages? > Of course it does! duh! For the record, the error messages in httpd-error.log read: [alert] mod_unique_id:unable to gethostbyname("xxxxx") where xxxx was the made-up host name I used during the install. I edited /etc/rc.conf to change hostname to a valid name, and apache now starts fine. Thank you! ------=_Part_1041_257339.1137178054172-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 19:15:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F06C816A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:15:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Received: from mail.scls.lib.wi.us (mail.scls.lib.wi.us [198.150.40.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9297F43D45 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:15:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Received: from [172.26.2.238] ([172.26.2.238]) by mail.scls.lib.wi.us (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k0DJFHR4024229; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:15:17 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from nalists@scls.lib.wi.us) Message-ID: <43C7FC45.1020907@scls.lib.wi.us> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:15:17 -0600 From: Greg Barniskis User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Frank Staals References: <17821403.1137174943074.JavaMail.root@m11> <43C7F032.3020109@scls.lib.wi.us> <43C7F609.3010607@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <43C7F609.3010607@gmx.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: snarmont@wnec.edu, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: httpd could not be started X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:15:21 -0000 Frank Staals wrote: > Greg Barniskis wrote: >> apache2_enable="YES" >> >> in your rc.conf? >> >> The need for this as well as the proper syntax should be noted in the >> file /usr/ports/www/apache2/pkg-msg. For any other port you install >> there's probably gold nuggets of info in its pkg-msg file. This stuff >> displays during the make install, but then so does several K of other >> info so it's not hard to miss these things. >> > In fact, it doesn't realy matter if you add apache_enable="YES" to > rc.conf ( since het installed apache13 adding apache2_enable="YES" would > be quite useless ... ) Duh. Sorry, the later line about him trying apache22 got stuck in my mind. > when you start it manually from commandline, > adding it to rc.conf is only usefull when you want to start apache from > boot, which can be quite usefull, but it can't be the reason why apache > wouldn't start. Oh. I was sure that I'd read in a previous thread that the lack of an enable flag would stop it from being started at all, but that must have been for a different port or in a different context. Anyway, thanks for the correction, always glad to have my misconceptions destroyed. -- Greg Barniskis, Computer Systems Integrator South Central Library System (SCLS) Library Interchange Network (LINK) , (608) 266-6348 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 19:26:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D7B916A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:26:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mcbrune@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5891343D49 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:26:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mcbrune@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i20so664979wra for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:26:03 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=GFHGycxpGOn6tru9Atf6qqm8Dwn0OuGeo3Hjqui15qPbrDf+WXhZiGPF5tjP7dprE6th0wTEAmcmAm/EaswEnx8gYw0Vi/jO2Mtx4JDoEuRkFDc6ExE7gWGU35NCPQCVXLARPR6Oig1Jp2d5tozy9bVhmqNNPwhnFOB4ShXw/w8= Received: by 10.65.205.7 with SMTP id h7mr2047113qbq; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:26:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.65.192.12 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:26:03 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <562705370601131126y37d73211g513504b72b48d6f0@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:26:03 -0600 From: Corey Brune To: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" In-Reply-To: <43C7CD38.7010207@veldy.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <43C7CD38.7010207@veldy.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What does this message mean (watchdog timeout DC0)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:26:05 -0000 It may be hardware related. Have you made any system changes lately? How often does this occur? On 1/13/06, Thomas T. Veldhouse wrote: > I am seeing the following in my security logs. Can anybody tell me what > this means? Perhaps I should consider a new NIC? > > +dc0: watchdog timeout > +dc0: link state changed to DOWN > +dc0: link state changed to UP > > > Thanks in advance, > > Tom Veldhouse > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 19:29:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D86C416A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:29:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tofik@oxygen.az) Received: from mail.alkar.net (mail.alkar.net [195.248.191.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3038743D49 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:29:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tofik@oxygen.az) Received: from [213.227.193.75] (HELO [192.168.0.178]) by mail.alkar.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.9) with ESMTP id 424892282; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:29:20 +0200 Message-ID: <43C81BE5.2070003@oxygen.az> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:30:13 +0000 From: Tofik Suleymanov User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050404) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: snarmont@wnec.edu References: <32789224.1137178054226.JavaMail.root@m11> In-Reply-To: <32789224.1137178054226.JavaMail.root@m11> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Kiffin Gish Subject: Re: httpd could not be started X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:29:23 -0000 Steven Narmontas wrote: >On Fri Jan 13 10:05:52 PST 2006, Kiffin Gish > wrote: > > > >>On Fri, 2006-01-13 at 09:55 -0800, Steven Narmontas wrote: >> >> >>>... >>> >>>Everything to this point went smoothly! I edited >>>/usr/local/etc/apache/httpd.conf ONLY to set the ServerName to >>>the IP address of the machine. However, when I try to start >>>apache I get: >>> >>>#/usr/local/sbin/apachectl start >>>/usr/local/sbin/apachectl start: httpd could not be started >>> >>> >>> >>Maybe httpd-error.log contains some suspicious-looking error >>messages? >> >> >> > > >Of course it does! duh! > >For the record, the error messages in httpd-error.log read: > > [alert] mod_unique_id:unable to gethostbyname("xxxxx") > >where xxxx was the made-up host name I used during the install. > >I edited /etc/rc.conf to change hostname to a valid name, and >apache now starts fine. > >Thank you! > > > >------------------------------------------------------------------------ > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > You could just add it to /etc/hosts :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 19:31:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADEF116A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:31:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: from smtp1.versatel.nl (smtp1.versatel.nl [62.58.50.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA1F443D45 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:31:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 22930 invoked by uid 0); 13 Jan 2006 19:31:04 -0000 Received: from ip176-173-59-62.adsl.versatel.nl (HELO [192.168.2.5]) ([62.59.173.176]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp1.versatel.nl (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for < >; 13 Jan 2006 19:31:04 -0000 Message-ID: <43C8001C.8000001@gmx.net> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:31:40 +0100 From: Frank Staals User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20060105) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Greg Barniskis References: <17821403.1137174943074.JavaMail.root@m11> <43C7F032.3020109@scls.lib.wi.us> <43C7F609.3010607@gmx.net> <43C7FC45.1020907@scls.lib.wi.us> In-Reply-To: <43C7FC45.1020907@scls.lib.wi.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: snarmont@wnec.edu, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: httpd could not be started X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:31:07 -0000 Greg Barniskis wrote: > Frank Staals wrote: > >> Greg Barniskis wrote: >> >>> apache2_enable="YES" >>> >>> in your rc.conf? >>> >>> The need for this as well as the proper syntax should be noted in >>> the file /usr/ports/www/apache2/pkg-msg. For any other port you >>> install there's probably gold nuggets of info in its pkg-msg file. >>> This stuff displays during the make install, but then so does >>> several K of other info so it's not hard to miss these things. >>> >> In fact, it doesn't realy matter if you add apache_enable="YES" to >> rc.conf ( since het installed apache13 adding apache2_enable="YES" >> would be quite useless ... ) > > > Duh. Sorry, the later line about him trying apache22 got stuck in my > mind. > >> when you start it manually from commandline, adding it to rc.conf is >> only usefull when you want to start apache from boot, which can be >> quite usefull, but it can't be the reason why apache wouldn't start. > > > Oh. I was sure that I'd read in a previous thread that the lack of an > enable flag would stop it from being started at all, but that must > have been for a different port or in a different context. Anyway, > thanks for the correction, always glad to have my misconceptions > destroyed. > > If I recall correctly you can only start the services in /etc/rc.d/ if you have them in /etc/rc.conf with '/etc/rc.d/ start'. ( But off-course there is a way to start them without adding them to rc.conf : '/etc/rc.d/ forcestart' ). You must have mixed up the two ( /etc/rc.d/ and /usr/local/etc/rc.d/ ) -- -Frank Staals From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 19:40:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E93AC16A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:40:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ravee_26@yahoo.com) Received: from web30208.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web30208.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.200.91]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 87C3F43D45 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:40:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ravee_26@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 3647 invoked by uid 60001); 13 Jan 2006 19:40:23 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=sUO3zwvdbcITaUMqaE2H17o4bFlXy5Q9X/DbKvXHCPx4ySBVSKn9OxuYlTyyUhUOUu/wNoOou+5+OufhIo63K8UjVKYmla9GqM38JzzYQEKpE/UtJwClGKc+aUAVvDXWhAFQ8ubFchYwEhiU/GFLw4EbEJX9eyl8fQIoGWVITIU= ; Message-ID: <20060113194023.3645.qmail@web30208.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [202.88.246.117] by web30208.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:40:23 GMT Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:40:23 +0000 (GMT) From: Ravi Kumar To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Subject: System hangs for 30 minutes before booting normally into freebsd 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:40:25 -0000 Hello, I am a new convert to freebsd 6.0. I installed it on one of my old machine - a celeron 333 MHz, 98 MB RAM, with ISA slots. While installing it on my system, I faced a problem that it took a long time to load the freebsd installer menu. So I rebooted and selected the FreeBSD installation in verbose mode. This is the verbose output snippet I recieved: ... pci0: at device 73 (no drivers attached) pci0: at device 16.0 (no driver attached) ex_isa_identify() ata: ata0 already exists; skipping it ata: ata1 already exists; skipping it pnp_identify: Trying Read_Port at 203 pnp_identify: Trying Read_Port at 243 pnp_identify: Trying Read_Port at 283 pnp_identify: Trying Read_Port at 2c3 pnp_identify: Trying Read_Port at 303 pnp_identify: Trying Read_Port at 343 pnp_identify: Trying Read_Port at 383 ... The problem is the last 8 lines above. It is I believe scanning some ports and is taking such a long time. After this the normal booting is quite fast. Is there any way I can disable this process of scanning that is taking place? After installing freebsd, each time I boot into it, it hangs for 30 minutes at the code snippet above. My uname -a command gave the following output. FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Thu Nov 3 09:36:13 UTC 2005 root@x64.samco.home:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 Looking forward to a reply to this problem. Kind regards Ravi ___________________________________________________________ Yahoo! Photos – NEW, now offering a quality print service from just 8p a photo http://uk.photos.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 19:50:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCCDB16A41F; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:50:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jack@jarasoft.net) Received: from orac.jarasoft.net (raats.xs4all.nl [80.126.151.47]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41D8A43D49; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:50:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jack@jarasoft.net) Received: from orac.jarasoft.net (localhost.jarasoft.net [127.0.0.1]) by orac.jarasoft.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3F35120A6; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:50:30 +0100 (CET) Received: from jara3 (unknown [192.168.1.64]) by orac.jarasoft.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 962751142F; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:50:30 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <001a01c6187a$9c8bc440$4001a8c0@jarasoft.net> From: "Jack Raats" To: "FreeBSD Questions" , "FreeBSD Stable" Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:50:31 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 1 X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: BUg on latest mysql40-client portupgrade. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jack Raats List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:50:32 -0000 Since the latest mysql40-client port upgrade, I'm getting a mysql error: Jan 13 20:04:33 orac kernel: Starting gld. Jan 13 20:04:33 orac kernel: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Jan 13 20:04:33 orac kernel: Shared object "libmysqlclient.so.12" not = found, required by "gld" Can anyone help me or give me a clue? FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE and mysql-client-4.0.26_1 GLD 1.6 gives the error Jack From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 19:58:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DFF616A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:58:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kael.fischer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.192]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 178C943D48 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:58:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kael.fischer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id 9so714440nzo for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:58:33 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=HyPCTBLRx3CgeI85AUgasoRA1mE/8GlxjSStwIVU6LzJwRyvk7BX/v6TIdJXWgBFIVc0buOWbTBtLKtq1n0wMRQPJUFyUVIu87BmAq1jxQOCGMSfsMWwx1Da3TCurCH1MnGTO4Mk4/rbd7qZy/1bs3KZV5cwrtrc4a4z0qKhrlE= Received: by 10.36.196.12 with SMTP id t12mr2774266nzf; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:58:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.50.7 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:58:33 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:58:33 -0800 From: Kael Fischer To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline Subject: canned distribution's i86 disk space requirements? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: kael@sonic.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:58:34 -0000 Hi all: I am curious as to the disk space requirements of the various "canned distribution sets" on i86 hardware. While the following excerpt from the Handbook (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/install-pre.html= ) was accurate back in the day (I've been using FreeBSD since 2.2.X), it doesn't seem to have much relationship to the "Minimal" canned distributions in 6.0-Release. It certainly seems that X has grown larger than the 100 MB suggested. > A minimal installation of FreeBSD takes as little as 100 MB of disk > space. However, that is a very minimal install, leaving almost no > space for your own files. A more realistic minimum is 250 MB without > a graphical environment, and 350 MB or more if you want a graphical > user interface. If you intend to install a lot of third party software as > well, then you will need more space. Does anyone know how much space Minimal, User and X-User take to install? This would be excellent information to have available for the user and sysinstall itself. What would be almost too much to hope for, would be some error checking where the diskspace requirements of the selected packages are compared to the requested partitioning scheme before the commit. It was a dream I had once... The current failure mode is inelegant. [this is not a flame about sysinstall... i find it easy to use, most of the time, and it has improved over the years.] If someone knows the answer, let's get it into the handbook. Or perhaps someone has hooks for sysinstall/dist.h and dist.c that can pull out the tar file names (e.g. base.am,...) for various sets? I imagine that a basic understanding of the install process would be all that is really needed to figure out what files are used for what sets. -- Kael Fischer, Ph.D DeRisi Lab - Univ. Of California San Francisco From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 20:06:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF1E316A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:06:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from veldy@veldy.net) Received: from fuggle.veldy.net (fuggle.veldy.net [209.240.64.129]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B012343D58 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:06:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from veldy@veldy.net) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fuggle.veldy.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB677C21D; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:06:29 -0600 (CST) Received: from fuggle.veldy.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (fuggle.veldy.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 73538-01; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:06:27 -0600 (CST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fuggle.veldy.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C207FC21B; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:06:26 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <43C80842.70906@veldy.net> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:06:26 -0600 From: "Thomas T. Veldhouse" User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (Windows/20050716) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Corey Brune References: <43C7CD38.7010207@veldy.net> <562705370601131126y37d73211g513504b72b48d6f0@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <562705370601131126y37d73211g513504b72b48d6f0@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at veldy.net Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What does this message mean (watchdog timeout DC0)? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:06:34 -0000 Corey Brune wrote: >It may be hardware related. Have you made any system changes lately? >How often does this occur? > > No changes since about last April. I did move from FBSD 5.x to FBSD 6.x (RELENG_6_0) at the time that 6.0 was released. Nothing since. I have seen the issue a couple of times this week, but I have not had any network problems that I have noticed. I have noticed this problem for years on and off (so to speak) with DC cards. But lately, I seem to be seeing it more. Tom Veldhouse From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 20:25:05 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 849D716A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:25:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jmf@jim-liesl.org) Received: from mta9.adelphia.net (mta9.adelphia.net [68.168.78.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F0A43D48 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:25:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jmf@jim-liesl.org) Received: from daemon.jim-liesl.org ([70.33.46.68]) by mta9.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060113202503.YHVA14388.mta9.adelphia.net@daemon.jim-liesl.org> for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:25:03 -0500 Received: from daemon.jim-liesl.org (localhost.clspco.adelphia.net [127.0.0.1]) by daemon.jim-liesl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 569C46115 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:27:57 -0700 (MST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (daemon.clspco.adelphia.net [192.168.1.15]) by daemon.jim-liesl.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E83196101 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:27:56 -0700 (MST) Message-ID: <43C80BF0.9050609@jim-liesl.org> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:22:08 -0700 From: jim feldman User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.8 (Windows/20040913) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Subject: NIC bonding/teaming X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:25:05 -0000 Does 6.x have a nic bonding/teaming/failover feature like the linux bond (rnd robin, failover, ld bal, trunking)? I'm thinking multiple nics, one server, same lan/vlan. I've read up on CARP and one2many, but they don't seem to do what bond does. thanks jim From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 20:31:20 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E59616A41F; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:31:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5994C43D46; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:31:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C3FE1A3C26; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:31:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F24B954B92; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:31:18 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:31:16 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Jack Raats Message-ID: <20060113203116.GA47416@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <001a01c6187a$9c8bc440$4001a8c0@jarasoft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <001a01c6187a$9c8bc440$4001a8c0@jarasoft.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: FreeBSD Stable , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: BUg on latest mysql40-client portupgrade. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:31:20 -0000 --7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 08:50:31PM +0100, Jack Raats wrote: > Since the latest mysql40-client port upgrade, I'm getting a mysql error: >=20 > Jan 13 20:04:33 orac kernel: Starting gld. > Jan 13 20:04:33 orac kernel: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: > Jan 13 20:04:33 orac kernel: Shared object "libmysqlclient.so.12" not fou= nd, required by "gld" >=20 > Can anyone help me or give me a clue? >=20 > FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE and mysql-client-4.0.26_1 > GLD 1.6 gives the error You forgot to portupgrade the things that depend on mysql, such as gld. Kris --7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDyA4TWry0BWjoQKURAj7eAJ95Il0TxXFhbKdPQ9vpyaQ7C2X5jQCcDIA6 2eobhMmX4oBLd6rPHBxxSMI= =PEKd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7AUc2qLy4jB3hD7Z-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 20:34:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89F6A16A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:34:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0DD943D4C for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:34:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C73E61A3C27; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:34:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 16194529C5; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:34:00 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:33:59 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: offbyone Message-ID: <20060113203359.GB47416@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <43C78D52.60301@xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xgyAXRrhYN0wYx8y" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43C78D52.60301@xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: XFree86 on FreeBSD 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:34:01 -0000 --xgyAXRrhYN0wYx8y Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 12:21:54PM +0100, offbyone wrote: > My problem: > Running FreeBSD_5.4-RELEASE with XFree86-4.5.0, there is a mis-match:=20 > the underlying o.s. and newly installed and upgraded ports expect X.org > After portupgrade of an X-supported port, this mis-match shows up as=20 > "stale dependency(ies)" It's a bore repeatedly to point new and upgraded= =20 > ports to XFree86-libraries-4.5.0, etc. (and there is no XFree86=20 > component that corresponds directly to X.org-TrueType, or is there?) > My questions: > 0.) How to change the underlying o.s. default expectation to XFree86 AND= =20 > is this a good idea for the present and future of 5.x? > 1.) Is a better solution to bite the bullet, deinstall all XFree86=20 > components and install X.org, since FreeBDS is 5.x? > (N.B. I do not want to start a flame over XFree86 vs. X.org. That's a=20 > too-old and pointless debate, and I have no inherent reason to prefer=20 > one over the other.) > Thanks, very much. for more info, suggestions. See /usr/ports/UPDATING or the FAQ Kris --xgyAXRrhYN0wYx8y Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDyA63Wry0BWjoQKURApBiAJ4rW4xjRmApV0r8xckvu/DL/PaRDwCgh+fy sRuKfIIqOG2BwmVovAaBuyU= =bTfc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xgyAXRrhYN0wYx8y-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 20:34:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DF6216A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:34:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 387B143D46 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:34:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E1B51A3C27; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:34:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 6D03E529C5; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:34:50 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:34:50 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: offbyone Message-ID: <20060113203450.GC47416@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <43C78D52.60301@xs4all.nl> <43C7BDFC.6040106@xs4all.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="JgQwtEuHJzHdouWu" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43C7BDFC.6040106@xs4all.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: "Andrew P." , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: XFree86 on FreeBSD 5.4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:34:51 -0000 --JgQwtEuHJzHdouWu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 03:49:32PM +0100, offbyone wrote: > Thanks for the reminder about pkgtools.conf. > But about FreeBSD 6... > I still see a lot of complaints of headaches from people using 6, here=20 > and on the -Stable mailing list, so I'm dubious. What about all the people you don't see complaining because it just works (or works better) for them? :-) Kris --JgQwtEuHJzHdouWu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDyA7pWry0BWjoQKURAtoIAKDL1M8SislDIlL6h+jz8E6FlffbUQCfSyQD M3nRPmV2A1GA8h8RKHiUWnY= =aTzT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --JgQwtEuHJzHdouWu-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 20:36:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8612216A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:36:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29EB343D49 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:36:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D2DC1A3C27; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:36:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4EBA1529C5; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:36:58 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:36:58 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Rainer Hungershausen Message-ID: <20060113203658.GD47416@xor.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IDYEmSnFhs3mNXr+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.3 Kernel module with 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:36:59 -0000 --IDYEmSnFhs3mNXr+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 11:10:21PM +0100, Rainer Hungershausen wrote: > Hi there! >=20 > I've got a Highpoint RocketRAID 454 Controller running under FreeBSD 5.3. > It needs a binary only driver (hpt374.ko) to run. > I'd like to upgrade to 6.0 for several reasons, but the latest driver > module from highpoint is for 5.3. > So here's my question: > Is it possible to simply run the 5.3 kernel module under 6.x? In > theory this could work if the kernel interfaces haven't changed, > right? Yes, but they did, so you can't. Kris --IDYEmSnFhs3mNXr+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDyA9qWry0BWjoQKURAtg5AJ9+oQ1d7iNf217nE95EmbsdGVubVQCfVag0 yYEvJshpVcRBtjAhgH3pagg= =wbP1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IDYEmSnFhs3mNXr+-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 20:40:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AC8916A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:40:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF73443D46 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:40:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1DA41A3C25; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:40:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CA63654BCE; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:40:02 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:40:02 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Crispy Beef Message-ID: <20060113204002.GE47416@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <43C540A1.7060805@ntlworld.com> <200601111059.21012.kstewart@owt.com> <43C628D2.3070500@ntlworld.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="XuV1QlJbYrcVoo+x" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43C628D2.3070500@ntlworld.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Kent Stewart Subject: Re: 4.6-RELEASE to 6.0-RELEASE... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:40:12 -0000 --XuV1QlJbYrcVoo+x Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 10:00:50AM +0000, Crispy Beef wrote: > >There have been major changes in processes such as threads. You also=20 > >have to boot the 5.3 update in single user mode to have a kernel that=20 > >accepts the new arrangement and then install the userland. Before 5.1=20 > >or 5.2 it didn't matter much but there was an fs change that you update= =20 > >in single user mode or boot the fix disc to finish the botched update. > > > >You also have the problem that probably none of your ports from 4.x will= =20 > >work at 6.0. This could take quite a bit of time to upgrade. >=20 > One advantage is that I didn't really bother with the ports on that serve= r,=20 > I rolled my own apps as I wasn't totally up with the ports system at the= =20 > time, just seemed easier until I go the hang of it, so I probably would g= o=20 > for a fresh install of ports and get the latest versions of software=20 > installed that way. You'll need to delete them all by hand somehow, of course. Otherwise you'll have conflicts between your old and new stuff. > The server is used for web hosting so I only really need to save out a fe= w=20 > config files for virtual hosts etc. and the email directories. >=20 > It's sounding as though it might be easier just to have an hour or two of= =20 > downtime late one night and do a fresh install... Yes, this will be easiest (or use sysinstall's 'upgrade' mode). Unless you have a serial console, doing the src upgrade will be hard and prone to dramatic failure. Kris --XuV1QlJbYrcVoo+x Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDyBAiWry0BWjoQKURAkFiAJ97zXJxjxZUxjIY1eg6YPiJI37iWgCgtFQO ezp5OrfRHD8i36VYIhJul9c= =2XPU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --XuV1QlJbYrcVoo+x-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 20:44:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5642516A420 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:44:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCB2643D70 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:44:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B8211A3C27; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:44:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B245354B8E; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:44:51 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:44:51 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: fbsd_user Message-ID: <20060113204450.GF47416@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <43C540A1.7060805@ntlworld.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="7mxbaLlpDEyR1+x6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Crispy Beef , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 4.6-RELEASE to 6.0-RELEASE... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:44:59 -0000 --7mxbaLlpDEyR1+x6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Wed, Jan 11, 2006 at 02:08:11PM -0500, fbsd_user wrote: > There is a new and faster file system which is introduced in > release-5.4. Performance benefits weren't a goal of UFS2. If your disk hardware is fast enough (i.e. not crappy ATA hardware) you might see a small performance boost, as I did in my tests. The cause of this isn't well-understood, i.e. it seems to be a side-effect of something else. The cost is that UFS2 performs more disk I/O than UFS1, which means that if your disk hardware is already saturated (see: aforementioned crappy ATA hardware), it may actually be slower. Kris --7mxbaLlpDEyR1+x6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDyBFCWry0BWjoQKURAoCMAKDTDKAIUFMdotMZaN2rXPqTWb/I8QCfbnEe QuGk68LZYx0wVOIjBz7uiuk= =qBL1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --7mxbaLlpDEyR1+x6-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 20:46:48 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D23916A422 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:46:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from mta13.adelphia.net (mta13.mail.adelphia.net [68.168.78.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AB1643D45 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:46:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from parv@pair.com) Received: from default.chvlva.adelphia.net ([68.67.248.200]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060113204646.RFUU8904.mta13.adelphia.net@default.chvlva.adelphia.net>; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:46:46 -0500 Received: by default.chvlva.adelphia.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1F2F6B736; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:46:47 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 15:46:47 -0500 From: Parv To: Jose Borquez Message-ID: <20060113204646.GA62943@holestein.holy.cow> Mail-Followup-To: Jose Borquez , FreeBSD Questions group References: <43C751DF.3010106@sbcglobal.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43C751DF.3010106@sbcglobal.net> Cc: FreeBSD Questions group Subject: Re: SIOCFRENB: Invalid argument when attempt to stop Ipfirewall X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:46:48 -0000 in message <43C751DF.3010106@sbcglobal.net>, wrote Jose Borquez thusly... > > I am attempting to stop Ipfirewall using ipf -D, but I keep getting the > following error: > SIOCFRENB: Invalid argument One thing to keep in mind: "IP Firewall" corresponds to ipfw(8) and "IPFilter" to ipf(8). Looking at the ipf(8) man page, -D option disables ipf only if it is compiled in the kernel. Could it be that you have ipf module loaded instead of being compiled in the kernel? - Parv -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 20:53:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7939316A41F; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:53:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bp@barryp.org) Received: from eden.barryp.org (host-56-58-111-24.midco.net [24.111.58.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C9043D76; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:53:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bp@barryp.org) Received: from geo.med.und.nodak.edu ([134.129.166.11]) by eden.barryp.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1ExVv2-000G7G-G7; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:53:09 -0600 Message-ID: <43C81331.5040805@barryp.org> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:53:05 -0600 From: Barry Pederson User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <001a01c6187a$9c8bc440$4001a8c0@jarasoft.net> <20060113203116.GA47416@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20060113203116.GA47416@xor.obsecurity.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Stable , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: BUg on latest mysql40-client portupgrade. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:53:23 -0000 Kris Kennaway wrote: > On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 08:50:31PM +0100, Jack Raats wrote: >> Since the latest mysql40-client port upgrade, I'm getting a mysql error: >> >> Jan 13 20:04:33 orac kernel: Starting gld. >> Jan 13 20:04:33 orac kernel: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: >> Jan 13 20:04:33 orac kernel: Shared object "libmysqlclient.so.12" not found, required by "gld" >> >> Can anyone help me or give me a clue? >> >> FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE and mysql-client-4.0.26_1 >> GLD 1.6 gives the error > > You forgot to portupgrade the things that depend on mysql, such as gld. Yeah, but normally doesn't portupgrade move any old libraries to /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg , so you're covered for backwards library compatibility normally? If you haven't rebooted since installing portupgrade, your ldconfig might not know about where portupgrade copies those old libraries. You could try running /usr/local/etc/rc.d/000.pkgtools.sh to straighten that out. Barry From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 20:59:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80F0316A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:59:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Zimmerman.Eric@con-way.com) Received: from ljcqs153.cnf.com (mail-cluster.cnf.com [63.230.177.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0836E43D5F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:59:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from Zimmerman.Eric@con-way.com) Received: from ljcqs153.cnf.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ljcqs153.cnf.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5810E14C037; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:59:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from ciies004.conway.prod.con-way.com (cnfdcx-131-slb-01-in.cnf.com [10.0.108.131]) by ljcqs153.cnf.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4652614C03E; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:59:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from qgaes001.conway.prod.con-way.com ([10.40.10.68]) by ciies004.conway.prod.con-way.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 13 Jan 2006 12:58:31 -0800 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:58:29 -0600 Message-ID: <12AAD6CC50A25841834F43955F39B66E033519B8@qgaes001.conway.prod.con-way.com> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: BUg on latest mysql40-client portupgrade. Thread-Index: AcYYgJWmO4poSFZvSm+HEcRbbRyVZAAA2TiQ From: "Zimmerman, Eric" To: "Jack Raats" X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Jan 2006 20:58:31.0031 (UTC) FILETIME=[1BF33070:01C61884] X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: RE: BUg on latest mysql40-client portupgrade. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:59:15 -0000 -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Kris Kennaway Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 2:31 PM To: Jack Raats Cc: FreeBSD Stable; FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: BUg on latest mysql40-client portupgrade. On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 08:50:31PM +0100, Jack Raats wrote: > Since the latest mysql40-client port upgrade, I'm getting a mysql error: >=20 > Jan 13 20:04:33 orac kernel: Starting gld. > Jan 13 20:04:33 orac kernel: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: > Jan 13 20:04:33 orac kernel: Shared object "libmysqlclient.so.12" not found, required by "gld" >=20 > Can anyone help me or give me a clue? >=20 > FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE and mysql-client-4.0.26_1 > GLD 1.6 gives the error >You forgot to portupgrade the things that depend on mysql, such as gld. Use portmanager and you wont ever have to worry about these things again. Check it out From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 21:30:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C22A16A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:30:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2373643D46 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:30:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from broadpark.no ([217.13.4.96]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IT1002T2VYCDT70@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:35:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from [80.202.4.61] (Forwarded-For: [213.187.181.70]) by bgo1mstore1.broadpark.no (mshttpd); Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:30:03 +0100 Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:30:03 +0100 From: Kristian Vaaf To: questions@freebsd.org Message-id: <66915a1d4f35.43c829eb@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sun Java(tm) System Messenger Express 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-language: en Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-Accept-Language: en Priority: normal Cc: Subject: Script to lock the state of my MP3 files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:30:16 -0000 Hello! I use this script to generate simple verification files (SFV) and MP3 playlist files (M3U) based on the info file (NFO) that I create for every album that I digitalize. If this is an album: ./dj_antoine-arabian_adventure-sessp010-vinyl-2005: 00-dj_antoine-arabian_adventure-sessp010-vinyl-2005.nfo 00-dj_antoine-arabian_adventure-sessp010-vinyl-2005-cover.jpg a1-dj_antoine-arabian_adventure_2-original_mix.mp3 b1-dj_antoine-arabian_adventure_2-chriss_ortega_and_thomas_gold_vocal_mix.mp3 b2-dj_antoine-arabian_adventure_2-chriss_ortega_and_thomas_gold_dub_mix.mp3 Then the script makes it into: ./dj_antoine-arabian_adventure-sessp010-vinyl-2005: 00-dj_antoine-arabian_adventure-sessp010-vinyl-2005.m3u 00-dj_antoine-arabian_adventure-sessp010-vinyl-2005.nfo 00-dj_antoine-arabian_adventure-sessp010-vinyl-2005.sfv 00-dj_antoine-arabian_adventure-sessp010-vinyl-2005-cover.jpg a1-dj_antoine-arabian_adventure_2-original_mix.mp3 b1-dj_antoine-arabian_adventure_2-chriss_ortega_and_thomas_gold_vocal_mix.mp3 b2-dj_antoine-arabian_adventure_2-chriss_ortega_and_thomas_gold_dub_mix.mp3 My script is made for regular sh though. If it were to be bashed -- how would it look like? #!/bin/sh # # Generate SFV and M3U files for MP3 albums. # $URBAN: mp3_archive.sh,v 1.0 2005/10/24 15:09:05 vaaf Exp $ # for file in `find $(pwd) -name \*.nfo`; do directory="`dirname ${file}`" prefix="`basename ${file} | sed 's/.nfo//g'`" current="`basename ${directory}`" sfv="${directory}/${prefix}.sfv" m3u="${directory}/${prefix}.m3u" cd ${directory} rm -f *.sfv; rm -f *.m3u touch ${sfv}; cfv -Cq *.mp3 cat ${current}.sfv | awk '! /^;/' > ${sfv} rm -f ${current}.sfv for mp3 in *.mp3; do echo "${mp3}" >> ${m3u}; done echo "$current: Done" done Thanks guys, Kristian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 21:37:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F22216A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:37:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nomadlogic@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.206]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7A6E43D46 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:37:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from nomadlogic@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id l1so660203nzf for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:37:03 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=NL3b33R0lEZS/90QjUiA3RcWYVGPO0H4g2ULGt7tm5JB21eiDa8cJGI1eaMXNk69/0ip8QUuA3aga0Ztd9aozk/87cyzUBYzTObUboeEpPjhzmCeikrCYA+kJKk4ge5jwTq1QLau6x8fJ86lvPai9TLncy2upzA35glrEoY5zDQ= Received: by 10.36.67.12 with SMTP id p12mr2997692nza; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:37:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.36.2.1 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:37:02 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <57d710000601131337i4c275c45w5f8d3efd1d433313@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:37:02 -0800 From: pete wright To: Kristian Vaaf In-Reply-To: <66915a1d4f35.43c829eb@broadpark.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <66915a1d4f35.43c829eb@broadpark.no> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Script to lock the state of my MP3 files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:37:08 -0000 On 1/13/06, Kristian Vaaf wrote: > > Hello! > > I use this script to generate simple verification files (SFV) and MP3 pla= ylist files (M3U) > based on the info file (NFO) that I create for every album that I digital= ize. > > If this is an album: > > ./dj_antoine-arabian_adventure-sessp010-vinyl-2005: > 00-dj_antoine-arabian_adventure-sessp010-vinyl-2005.nfo > 00-dj_antoine-arabian_adventure-sessp010-vinyl-2005-cover.jpg > a1-dj_antoine-arabian_adventure_2-original_mix.mp3 > b1-dj_antoine-arabian_adventure_2-chriss_ortega_and_thomas_gold_vocal_mix= .mp3 > b2-dj_antoine-arabian_adventure_2-chriss_ortega_and_thomas_gold_dub_mix.m= p3 > > Then the script makes it into: > > ./dj_antoine-arabian_adventure-sessp010-vinyl-2005: > 00-dj_antoine-arabian_adventure-sessp010-vinyl-2005.m3u > 00-dj_antoine-arabian_adventure-sessp010-vinyl-2005.nfo > 00-dj_antoine-arabian_adventure-sessp010-vinyl-2005.sfv > 00-dj_antoine-arabian_adventure-sessp010-vinyl-2005-cover.jpg > a1-dj_antoine-arabian_adventure_2-original_mix.mp3 > b1-dj_antoine-arabian_adventure_2-chriss_ortega_and_thomas_gold_vocal_mix= .mp3 > b2-dj_antoine-arabian_adventure_2-chriss_ortega_and_thomas_gold_dub_mix.m= p3 > > My script is made for regular sh though. > If it were to be bashed -- how would it look like? should be the same syntax for sh and bash as bash is a decendant of sh. i would keep the #! line /bin/sh as this will make the script more portable. -pete > > #!/bin/sh > # > # Generate SFV and M3U files for MP3 albums. > # $URBAN: mp3_archive.sh,v 1.0 2005/10/24 15:09:05 vaaf Exp $ > # > > for file in `find $(pwd) -name \*.nfo`; do > > directory=3D"`dirname ${file}`" > prefix=3D"`basename ${file} | sed 's/.nfo//g'`" > current=3D"`basename ${directory}`" > > sfv=3D"${directory}/${prefix}.sfv" > m3u=3D"${directory}/${prefix}.m3u" > > cd ${directory} > > rm -f *.sfv; rm -f *.m3u > touch ${sfv}; cfv -Cq *.mp3 > cat ${current}.sfv | awk '! /^;/' > ${sfv} > rm -f ${current}.sfv > > for mp3 in *.mp3; do echo "${mp3}" >> ${m3u}; done > > echo "$current: Done" > > done > > Thanks guys, > Kristian > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > -- ~~o0OO0o~~ Pete Wright www.nycbug.org NYC's *BSD User Group From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 21:48:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 418F816A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:48:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-3-1-cust208.cdif.cable.ntl.com [82.31.78.208]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAF0E43D46 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:48:05 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrir.wireless.private.submonkey.net ([192.168.11.23]) by shrike.submonkey.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ExWm8-00086F-UX; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:48:04 +0000 In-Reply-To: <43C80BF0.9050609@jim-liesl.org> References: <43C80BF0.9050609@jim-liesl.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-11--32115686" Message-Id: <41B6048D-0F43-452A-8135-F2BF71B2DEF2@submonkey.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ceri Davies Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:47:53 +0000 To: jim feldman X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.1 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NIC bonding/teaming X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:48:06 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-11--32115686 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On 13 Jan 2006, at 20:22, jim feldman wrote: > Does 6.x have a nic bonding/teaming/failover feature like the linux > bond (rnd robin, failover, ld bal, trunking)? I'm thinking > multiple nics, one server, same lan/vlan. I've read up on CARP and > one2many, but they don't seem to do what bond does. > I think you want ng_one2many(4). Ceri --Apple-Mail-11--32115686 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDyCAOme8yCsQvJJ0RAs0hAJ9UXs+IiyLFge5Q0IjtcTyJYGRvNwCgiRUX Hl0AmcMqi5dVTb2uM+wUt8Q= =DxW6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-11--32115686-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 21:53:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEE1516A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:53:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from coredumped@coredumped.org.ru) Received: from plus.ru (relay.plus.ru [82.179.192.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 248AD43D48 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:53:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from coredumped@coredumped.org.ru) Received: from [85.141.182.25] (account coredumped@coredumped.org.ru HELO [192.168.1.2]) by plus.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.9) with ESMTP-TLS id 71454393; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:53:40 +0300 Message-ID: <43C82162.40909@coredumped.org.ru> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:53:38 +0300 From: Eugeny Kuzakov User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051220) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maksim Yevmenkin References: <43C7DA71.5080609@coredumped.org.ru> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kbdmux: unable to work with dual keyboard X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:53:44 -0000 Maksim Yevmenkin wrote: >no, its not the same as in your previous email. you got different >error. did you run your script in console or xterm window? > >also, just to be on the safe side, you might want to replace >/dev/console with /dev/ttyv0, i.e. > >kbdcontrol -K < /dev/ttyv0 >kbdcontrol -a ukbd0 < /dev/kbdmux0 >kbdcontrol -a atkbd0 < /dev/kbdmux0 >kbdcontrol -k /dev/kbdmux0 < /dev/ttyv0 > > there are no good sounds:( kbdcontrol -K < /dev/ttyv0 kbdcontrol -a ukbd0 < /dev/kbdmux0 kbdcontrol -a atkbd0 < /dev/kbdmux0 kbdcontrol -k /dev/kbdmux0 < /dev/ttyv0 output: root@coredumped:/add/home/coredumped/tmp$cat mmm.log + kbdcontrol -K kbd0 atkbd0, type:AT 101/102 (2) + kbdcontrol -a ukbd0 kbdcontrol: unable to (un)mux the keyboard: Operation not supported by device kbd1 kbdmux0, type:AT 101/102 (2) + kbdcontrol -a atkbd0 kbdcontrol: unable to (un)mux the keyboard: Operation not supported by device kbd1 kbdmux0, type:AT 101/102 (2) + kbdcontrol -k /dev/kbdmux0 kbd1 kbdmux0, type:AT 101/102 (2) ---14-01-2006 00:53:15 thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 22:03:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 913CF16A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:03:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mailing-lists@msdi.ca) Received: from mail02.msdihosting.net (9.67-18-64.networks.msdihosting.net [64.18.67.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAED643D48 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:03:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mailing-lists@msdi.ca) Received: from ian.msdi.ca ([24.201.183.241]) by mail02.msdihosting.net ((iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003))) with SMTP id CLI20599 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:04:07 -0500 Message-Id: <7.0.0.16.2.20060113165547.054915c8@Msdi.ca> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.0.16 Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:03:16 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ian Lord In-Reply-To: <41B6048D-0F43-452A-8135-F2BF71B2DEF2@submonkey.net> References: <43C80BF0.9050609@jim-liesl.org> <41B6048D-0F43-452A-8135-F2BF71B2DEF2@submonkey.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-DEBUG: 1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: NIC bonding/teaming X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:03:33 -0000 At 16:47 2006-01-13, Ceri Davies wrote: >On 13 Jan 2006, at 20:22, jim feldman wrote: > >>Does 6.x have a nic bonding/teaming/failover feature like the linux >>bond (rnd robin, failover, ld bal, trunking)? I'm thinking >>multiple nics, one server, same lan/vlan. I've read up on CARP and >>one2many, but they don't seem to do what bond does. > >I think you want ng_one2many(4). > >Ceri Hi, I did a lot of tests with carp (was not appropriate at all), and ng_one2many I was able to make two nics appears at one with ng_one2many, but after severals days of tests and research, dropped it because it caused bad side effects and when I was pulling one nic out, it was stopping to transmit/receive for some moment. Also on the switch, both nics were registering the same mac address so my cisco was sending me warning about it every minute. If you find a way to make it work that works perfectly, let me know, I think a lot of people will benefit from it cause there is a bunch of people asking for nic teaming and no real solution... personnally, I ended up doing the redundancy at layer 3 instead of layer 2. I used quagga (or zebra) and put one nic in a separate subnet. I then used ospf to share routes. basically, my website is on an ip I binded to my loopback adapter and there is two gateways (both nics) to the rest of the network. It's not a solution I'm proud of because I wish I would have succeed to team the nic like I could have done on windows or linux, but I didn't find a working solution... Good luck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 22:14:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA4E916A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:14:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [199.67.51.101]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EB7243D46 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:14:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.13.1/8.13.3) id k0DMECGm049855; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:14:12 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:14:12 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Ian Lord Message-ID: <20060113221411.GA10326@dan.emsphone.com> References: <43C80BF0.9050609@jim-liesl.org> <41B6048D-0F43-452A-8135-F2BF71B2DEF2@submonkey.net> <7.0.0.16.2.20060113165547.054915c8@Msdi.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7.0.0.16.2.20060113165547.054915c8@Msdi.ca> X-OS: FreeBSD 5.4-STABLE X-message-flag: Outlook Error User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.11 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NIC bonding/teaming X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:14:13 -0000 In the last episode (Jan 13), Ian Lord said: > At 16:47 2006-01-13, Ceri Davies wrote: > >On 13 Jan 2006, at 20:22, jim feldman wrote: > >>Does 6.x have a nic bonding/teaming/failover feature like the linux > >>bond (rnd robin, failover, ld bal, trunking)? I'm thinking > >>multiple nics, one server, same lan/vlan. I've read up on CARP and > >>one2many, but they don't seem to do what bond does. > > > >I think you want ng_one2many(4). > > I did a lot of tests with carp (was not appropriate at all), and > ng_one2many > > I was able to make two nics appears at one with ng_one2many, but > after severals days of tests and research, dropped it because it > caused bad side effects and when I was pulling one nic out, it was > stopping to transmit/receive for some moment. Also on the switch, > both nics were registering the same mac address so my cisco was > sending me warning about it every minute. That's because you forgot to configure your cisco and tell it those two ports were trunked together :) Another alternative to ng_one2many is ng_fec, which despite its name does not actually negotiate the FEC protocol with the remote end (you have to hardcode it on the switch), but does do mac/ip port hashing. That prevents packet reordering within flows. Patches to add LACP negotiation (FEC is obsolete) are welcome though :) -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 22:19:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1EE816A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:19:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maksim.yevmenkin@gmail.com) Received: from uproxy.gmail.com (uproxy.gmail.com [66.249.92.200]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 222DA43D64 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:19:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from maksim.yevmenkin@gmail.com) Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id o2so34666uge for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:19:14 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=uI1MYP7rI10TEC1+S/DjUZbsJiyK3Cp7B3VHiafv3Wv4bar5J4CJ5B9L0DcmANBHtsocCFXzZ7pQ1mdFn43OgQZ9dV2OeJU3RfqL/OOrWIDefvDBNDYq/feE5naQbLfiLykjZwHUMqw/k3aa6EwKhG32AAyoy6qifKaFNXxf9qY= Received: by 10.49.88.19 with SMTP id q19mr99812nfl; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:19:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.49.4.9 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:19:13 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:19:13 -0800 From: Maksim Yevmenkin To: Eugeny Kuzakov In-Reply-To: <43C82162.40909@coredumped.org.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <43C7DA71.5080609@coredumped.org.ru> <43C82162.40909@coredumped.org.ru> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kbdmux: unable to work with dual keyboard X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:19:22 -0000 > >no, its not the same as in your previous email. you got different > >error. did you run your script in console or xterm window? > > > >also, just to be on the safe side, you might want to replace > >/dev/console with /dev/ttyv0, i.e. > > kbdcontrol -K < /dev/ttyv0 > kbdcontrol -a ukbd0 < /dev/kbdmux0 > kbdcontrol -a atkbd0 < /dev/kbdmux0 > kbdcontrol -k /dev/kbdmux0 < /dev/ttyv0 > > output: > > root@coredumped:/add/home/coredumped/tmp$cat mmm.log > + kbdcontrol -K > kbd0 > atkbd0, type:AT 101/102 (2) > + kbdcontrol -a ukbd0 > kbdcontrol: unable to (un)mux the keyboard: Operation not supported by > device > kbd1 > kbdmux0, type:AT 101/102 (2) > + kbdcontrol -a atkbd0 > kbdcontrol: unable to (un)mux the keyboard: Operation not supported by > device > kbd1 > kbdmux0, type:AT 101/102 (2) > + kbdcontrol -k /dev/kbdmux0 > kbd1 > kbdmux0, type:AT 101/102 (2) > ---14-01-2006 00:53:15 well, you are doing something wrong. stupid questions: did you kldload kbdmux? is your userland and kernel in sync? i just tried beetle# uname -a FreeBSD beetle.digisle.com 7.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 7.0-CURRENT #47: Thu Jan 5 14:20:02 PST 2006 =20 max@beetle.digisle.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 beetle# ls -la /dev/*kbd* crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 39 Jan 6 12:21 /dev/atkbd0 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 6 Dec 31 1969 /dev/kbd0 -> atkbd0 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 5 Jan 6 04:21 /dev/kbd1 -> ukbd0 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 7 Jan 13 09:46 /dev/kbd2 -> kbdmux0 crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 124 Jan 6 12:21 /dev/kbdmux0 crw------- 1 root wheel 0, 89 Jan 6 12:21 /dev/ukbd0 beetle# cat k.sh #!/bin/sh -x kbdcontrol -K < /dev/ttyv0 kbdcontrol -a atkbd0 < /dev/kbdmux0 kbdcontrol -a ukbd0 < /dev/kbdmux0 kbdcontrol -k /dev/kbdmux0 < /dev/ttyv0 beetle# sh -x k.sh + kbdcontrol -K kbd0 atkbd0, type:AT 101/102 (2) + kbdcontrol -a atkbd0 kbd2 kbdmux0, type:AT 101/102 (2) + kbdcontrol -a ukbd0 kbd2 kbdmux0, type:AT 101/102 (2) + kbdcontrol -k /dev/kbdmux0 kbd2 kbdmux0, type:AT 101/102 (2) and both keyboards work. you might want to try other way, i.e. 1) connect usb keyboard and make sure it is _NOT_ default, i.e. comment out ubkd section in /etc/devd.conf and restart devd 2) kbdcontrol -a ukbd0 < /dev/kbdmux0 -- this should add ukbd0 to kbdmux0 but it will _NOT_ switch the keyboards. 3) if (3) above was succesful, then kbdcontrol -k /dev/kbdmux0 < /dev/ttyv0 -- this should switch the keyboard to kbdmux0 (and ukbd0). it should also cut out atkbd0. 4) add atkbd0 to kbdmux0 kbdcontrol -a atkbd0 < /dev/ttyv0 if everything above worked then you should have both keyboards working. thanks, max From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 22:25:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5FA016A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:25:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mailing-lists@msdi.ca) Received: from mail02.msdihosting.net (9.67-18-64.networks.msdihosting.net [64.18.67.9]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1689143D48 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:25:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mailing-lists@msdi.ca) Received: from ian.msdi.ca ([24.201.183.241]) by mail02.msdihosting.net ((iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003))) with SMTP id CLI20599 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:25:38 -0500 Message-Id: <7.0.0.16.2.20060113172122.0499a7c8@Msdi.ca> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.0.0.16 Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:24:56 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ian Lord In-Reply-To: <20060113221411.GA10326@dan.emsphone.com> References: <43C80BF0.9050609@jim-liesl.org> <41B6048D-0F43-452A-8135-F2BF71B2DEF2@submonkey.net> <7.0.0.16.2.20060113165547.054915c8@Msdi.ca> <20060113221411.GA10326@dan.emsphone.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-DEBUG: 1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: NIC bonding/teaming X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:25:04 -0000 At 17:14 2006-01-13, Dan Nelson wrote: >In the last episode (Jan 13), Ian Lord said: > > At 16:47 2006-01-13, Ceri Davies wrote: > > >On 13 Jan 2006, at 20:22, jim feldman wrote: > > >>Does 6.x have a nic bonding/teaming/failover feature like the linux > > >>bond (rnd robin, failover, ld bal, trunking)? I'm thinking > > >>multiple nics, one server, same lan/vlan. I've read up on CARP and > > >>one2many, but they don't seem to do what bond does. > > > > > >I think you want ng_one2many(4). > > > > I did a lot of tests with carp (was not appropriate at all), and > > ng_one2many > > > > I was able to make two nics appears at one with ng_one2many, but > > after severals days of tests and research, dropped it because it > > caused bad side effects and when I was pulling one nic out, it was > > stopping to transmit/receive for some moment. Also on the switch, > > both nics were registering the same mac address so my cisco was > > sending me warning about it every minute. > >That's because you forgot to configure your cisco and tell it those two >ports were trunked together :) > >Another alternative to ng_one2many is ng_fec, which despite its name >does not actually negotiate the FEC protocol with the remote end (you >have to hardcode it on the switch), but does do mac/ip port hashing. >That prevents packet reordering within flows. Patches to add LACP >negotiation (FEC is obsolete) are welcome though :) Oups :) Forgot to mention I was looking for switch redundancy also... So each nics were plugged into 2 separate switches so I was not able to configure the switch as trunk or etherchannel... On windows, I am able to team the nics on two different switches without problem with the hp or Intel teaming software, I guess only one nic works at the same time and register it's mac address in the switch tcam... For the original question, it should work with ng_one2Many :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 22:39:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E9BF16A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:39:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F14AC43D49 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:39:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1C371A3C26; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:39:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CCB0D5454F; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:39:32 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:39:32 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: "Zimmerman, Eric" Message-ID: <20060113223932.GA5626@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <12AAD6CC50A25841834F43955F39B66E033519B8@qgaes001.conway.prod.con-way.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <12AAD6CC50A25841834F43955F39B66E033519B8@qgaes001.conway.prod.con-way.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: BUg on latest mysql40-client portupgrade. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:39:34 -0000 --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 02:58:29PM -0600, Zimmerman, Eric wrote: > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Kris Kennaway > Sent: Friday, January 13, 2006 2:31 PM > To: Jack Raats > Cc: FreeBSD Stable; FreeBSD Questions > Subject: Re: BUg on latest mysql40-client portupgrade. >=20 > On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 08:50:31PM +0100, Jack Raats wrote: > > Since the latest mysql40-client port upgrade, I'm getting a mysql > error: > >=20 > > Jan 13 20:04:33 orac kernel: Starting gld. > > Jan 13 20:04:33 orac kernel: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: > > Jan 13 20:04:33 orac kernel: Shared object "libmysqlclient.so.12" not > found, required by "gld" > >=20 > > Can anyone help me or give me a clue? > >=20 > > FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE and mysql-client-4.0.26_1 > > GLD 1.6 gives the error >=20 > >You forgot to portupgrade the things that depend on mysql, such as gld. >=20 >=20 > Use portmanager and you wont ever have to worry about these things > again. Check it out A grand claim indeed ;-) Kris --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDyCwkWry0BWjoQKURAiHnAJ9RiH7odMGqppCLzvst+0yQk4d7cgCg7DLb HYQU5kMAp1mw0jZt1Z23mwM= =K+K4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UlVJffcvxoiEqYs2-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 13 23:37:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57CBC16A41F for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 23:37:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brent@academy.netmojo.ca) Received: from academy.netmojo.ca (academy.pims.math.ca [198.161.29.185]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF0B443D49 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 23:37:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from brent@academy.netmojo.ca) Received: by academy.netmojo.ca (Postfix, from userid 500) id D579E2125F; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:39:19 -0700 (MST) Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:39:19 -0700 From: Brent Kearney To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060113233919.GA10206@kearneys.ca> References: <20060113025614.GA5073@kearneys.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060113025614.GA5073@kearneys.ca> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i Subject: Re: apache2.0.55 w/ mod_ldap & tls X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 23:37:50 -0000 Hi again, To follow up on my own question, in case others upgrade from 2.0.54 and run into this problem, 2.0.55 requires these two directives before SSL is enabled in mod_ldap: LDAPTrustedCA /etc/ssl/CA/cacert.pem LDAPTrustedCAType BASE64_FILE The debug logs now produce: [Fri Jan 13 18:34:17 2006] [notice] LDAP: SSL support available Cheers, Brent On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 07:56:14PM -0700, Brent Kearney wrote: > Hello, > > I'm having some trouble getting apache's ldap module to connect to my openldap server > using TLS. The reason it won't initiate an SSL connection is evident in the logs: > > [Thu Jan 12 20:45:49 2006] [debug] util_ldap.c(1341): LDAP: SSL trusted certificate authority file type - BASE64_FILE > [Thu Jan 12 20:45:49 2006] [notice] SIGHUP received. Attempting to restart > [Thu Jan 12 20:45:50 2006] [debug] util_ldap.c(1341): LDAP: SSL trusted certificate authority file type - BASE64_FILE > [Thu Jan 12 20:45:51 2006] [notice] Digest: generating secret for digest authentication ... > [Thu Jan 12 20:45:51 2006] [notice] Digest: done > [Thu Jan 12 20:45:51 2006] [notice] LDAP: Built with OpenLDAP LDAP SDK > [Thu Jan 12 20:45:51 2006] [notice] LDAP: SSL support unavailable > [Thu Jan 12 20:45:51 2006] [notice] Apache/2.0.55 (FreeBSD) mod_ssl/2.0.55 OpenSSL/0.9.7e DAV/2 PHP/5.1.1 configured -- resuming normal operations > > > I found this bug report, which details what looks like the same problem: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/86416 > > However, it also mentions that the bug was supposed to be fixed in Apache 2.0.55, > which I'm running. As in that bug report, I am also using FreeBSD 5.4. I added > "LDAPTrustedCAType BASE64_FILE" to my httpd.conf file as suggested, but it makes > no difference. > > Ironically, it was working before I upgraded from apache 2.0.54. > > Any suggestions are welcome. > > Thanks, > > Brent > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 00:13:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C96BC16A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:13:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aburruss@gmail.com) Received: from uproxy.gmail.com (uproxy.gmail.com [66.249.92.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED7F043D46 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:13:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from aburruss@gmail.com) Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id a2so57621ugf for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:13:25 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type; b=NLBWGU1PhNphyJ3M7C1476kUwA+FhaK6OiWlspMDDtxoKMs6UqggV4KXrvE4WwuWZBWw2MRJFlNZzLTSXIS7eboVRsELc1V7O/X6GKsWsl95nFSxnDgb5Dh4NIAb96Z8IK0NvR7IwSlOXwtJW3fD6lNh5kY9w+D7bzD8Yobih3o= Received: by 10.48.164.9 with SMTP id m9mr104040nfe; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:07:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.232.8 with HTTP; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:07:19 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <1f1368120601131607n643aeb2cx7ab781dd9a9c76ae@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 16:07:19 -0800 From: Aaron Burruss To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: External USB drive on Sun HW X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:13:33 -0000 Hi there, I'm looking for some help on a problem I'm having with a new setup I've got... I'm running sparc64 6.0 and also have an external USB drive enclosur= e with a 250GB IDE drive in it. The drive is formatted as a BSD partition (formatting done on another box). I've got the following in my kernel: # USB support device uhci # UHCI PCI->USB interface device ohci # OHCI PCI->USB interface device usb # USB Bus (required) device ugen # Generic device uhid # "Human Interface Devices" device umass # Disks/Mass storage - Requires scbus and da I.m seeing this in dmesg: root@sun# dmesg |grep -i umass umass0: vendor 0x05e3 USB TO IDE, rev 2.00/0.33, addr 2 umass0: BBB reset failed, TIMEOUT umass0: BBB bulk-in clear stall failed, TIMEOUT umass0: BBB bulk-out clear stall failed, TIMEOUT umass0: BBB reset failed, TIMEOUT umass0: BBB bulk-in clear stall failed, TIMEOUT umass0: BBB bulk-out clear stall failed, TIMEOUT umass0: BBB reset failed, TIMEOUT umass0: BBB bulk-in clear stall failed, TIMEOUT umass0: BBB bulk-out clear stall failed, TIMEOUT umass0: BBB reset failed, TIMEOUT umass0: BBB bulk-in clear stall failed, TIMEOUT umass0: BBB bulk-out clear stall failed, TIMEOUT umass0: BBB reset failed, TIMEOUT umass0: BBB bulk-in clear stall failed, TIMEOUT umass0: BBB bulk-out clear stall failed, TIMEOUT root@sun# dmesg|grep -i usb ohci0: mem 0xe2000000-0xe2007fff at device 12.3on pci1 usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb0: on ohci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 ohci1: mem 0xe5000000-0xe5007fff at device 5.3on pci1 usb1: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb1: on ohci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 umass0: vendor 0x05e3 USB TO IDE, rev 2.00/0.33, addr 2 I see this in usbdevs output: root@sun# dmesg|grep -i usb ohci0: mem 0xe2000000-0xe2007fff at device 12.3on pci1 usb0: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb0: on ohci0 usb0: USB revision 1.0 ohci1: mem 0xe5000000-0xe5007fff at device 5.3on pci1 usb1: OHCI version 1.0, legacy support usb1: on ohci1 usb1: USB revision 1.0 umass0: vendor 0x05e3 USB TO IDE, rev 2.00/0.33, addr 2 My primary hard drives are da0 and da1 (all the how-to's say that daX shoul= d be where I mount.. but /dev only has my two primary drives: -su-2.05b# ls -la /dev/da* crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 16 Dec 20 20:11 /dev/da0 crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 18 Dec 20 12:11 /dev/da0a crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 19 Dec 20 20:11 /dev/da0b crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 20 Dec 20 20:11 /dev/da0c crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 17 Dec 20 20:11 /dev/da1 crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 21 Dec 20 20:11 /dev/da1c crw-r----- 1 root operator 4, 22 Dec 20 12:11 /dev/da1d -su-2.05b# dmesg|grep da.: da0: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da0: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 31, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da0: 34732MB (71132959 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 4427C) da1: Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device da1: 80.000MB/s transfers (40.000MHz, offset 31, 16bit), Tagged Queueing Enabled da1: 34732MB (71132959 512 byte sectors: 255H 63S/T 4427C) I can plug this into my AMD64 running FreeBSD 6, and it comes up with no problems. I THINK I'm probably missing something totally dumb... Anyone got any help for me on this? Yah.. I know.. get an i386 box with IDE drives. :) This is a small 1U box, and fits in my closet well. so I'd like to use it if possible. Thanks!!! Aaron From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 01:01:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21F6B16A423 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 01:01:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jekillen@prodigy.net) Received: from smtp109.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp109.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.229.96]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 7F46443D45 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 01:01:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jekillen@prodigy.net) Received: (qmail 83053 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2006 01:01:25 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?10.0.0.6?) (jekillen@prodigy.net@69.235.31.215 with plain) by smtp109.sbc.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Jan 2006 01:01:25 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v622) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: je killen Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 17:01:23 -0800 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.622) Subject: Re FreeBSD v 6.0 (boxed cd set) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 01:01:27 -0000 (On e-Machine with Intel Sempron processor and 256 mb memory). I'm not able to log into x via kdm as root and not able to su to root when in Gnome (or KDE for that matter). It also goes through what seem to be excessive sleep cycles (two lasting at least a minute apiece) during the boot process to establish the system's name. It refused ssh from my Mac OSX machine (It starts sshd on boot, which also takes a noticeable amount of time) What ftp server is recommended for FreeBSD? (There doesn't seem to be any provided by default install) How do I tell it who it really is? (Is it trying to contact a DNS server and/or /etc/hosts ?) How can I get set up to su to root in a console window? (Or do I have to learn to live with it?) If I can't get set up to su to root in a console window, how can I log into an x session as root? (Does it have to do with security levels, or who is a member of the 'wheel' group? Even Mac OSX only allows sudo -- and it is based on FreeBSD, isn't it?) Thanks JK This is definitely the most active list I've subscribed to (203 total e-mail load yesterday when usually 30 -50 per day with 3 other tech related list subscriptions) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 01:42:16 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6435916A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 01:42:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from out4.smtp.messagingengine.com (out4.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7C6643D45 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 01:42:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from frontend1.internal (mysql-sessions.internal [10.202.2.149]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52C8BD2F61D for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:42:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:42:12 -0500 X-Sasl-enc: epzuGTsu00xhgI30itjzm0JuckbsHjFPp6Lz4IpmSFsU 1137202929 Received: from gumby.localdomain (88-104-202-103.dynamic.dsl.as9105.com [88.104.202.103]) by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 963A25714A4 for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:42:09 -0500 (EST) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 01:42:08 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200601140142.10424.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Getting latest files with cvsweb for a given tag X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 01:42:16 -0000 Is there a cvsweb URL that will give me the latest version of a given file, given a specific tag? ie without specifying a explicit revision. What I am trying to do is write a script that will download the latest version of src/sys/conf/newvers.sh for RELENG_6_0, so it can parse out the version information and compare it with the output of uname -r. Or is there a better way of determining whether the installed world has been superceded by a new point-release (aside from reading mailing lists). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 03:19:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3113716A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 03:19:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kjelderg@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.204]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0C3D43D46 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 03:19:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kjelderg@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i20so725181wra for ; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:19:01 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; b=VHbiad2vW+xHW7MSN8vbPzEerlNJzdJFMpU58/CxTgIuyTPc3KKveVnUzNNUAujlsCWPWpmvWjceFR5esbAdCZdeF+Jj1azNB3EPRCcRPv0ImvwUUyIHmhV56YMzjUZfFQowlNFLV2kbhak23aykj9GKs7EwXn4Ch3Uk3nmHiIM= Received: by 10.54.143.1 with SMTP id q1mr1232988wrd; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:19:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.0.79? ( [221.186.3.89]) by mx.gmail.com with ESMTP id 9sm3207510wrl.2006.01.13.19.18.58; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:18:59 -0800 (PST) From: Eric Kjeldergaard To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 12:18:33 +0900 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <43C3E12C.3080001@messias.qhigh.com> In-Reply-To: <43C3E12C.3080001@messias.qhigh.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1543911.6JCYE9OoVI"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200601141218.37596.kjelderg@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Native voip software for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 03:19:02 -0000 --nextPart1543911.6JCYE9OoVI Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline =E6=B0=B4=E6=9B=9C=E6=97=A5 11 1=E6=9C=88 2006 01:30=E3=80=81User Gandalf = =E3=81=95=E3=82=93=E3=81=AF=E6=9B=B8=E3=81=8D=E3=81=BE=E3=81=97=E3=81=9F: > Hello, > > Do you know any native voip software for FreeBSD? > I hate to install Linux compatibility mode just to have skype working. > Thanks, > > Les [/usr/ports/net] #ls | grep phone cphone kphone linphone linphone-base ohphone Those as well as kiax seem good options, I think. I've been meaning to see= if=20 openwengo can compile and run on freebsd. Best of luck, Eric =2D-=20 The signature is a location used to give a personalised feel to each E-mail= =20 without having to personalise each E-mail. --nextPart1543911.6JCYE9OoVI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBDyG2NSMnO3Fce5JgRAl+4AKCGhW1pbDCTqqkqSV1IVSJfo1ZgtACcDHju E/COCq+RlRTeBvjPI/spDOc= =Wdo3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1543911.6JCYE9OoVI-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 04:15:25 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8890716A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 04:15:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from benfell@parts-unknown.org) Received: from parts-unknown.org (thunder.cybernude.org [66.93.170.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 487C843D48 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 04:15:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from benfell@parts-unknown.org) Received: (qmail 14834 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2006 04:15:24 -0000 Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 20:15:24 -0800 From: David Benfell To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060114041524.GA14008@parts-unknown.org> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-stardate: [-29]5160.87 X-moon: The Moon is Full User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.7i Subject: Ummm... Why can't I find the FreeBSD 6.0 ISO images? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 04:15:25 -0000 Hello all, It seems like no matter which site I try, I get a message that pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/6.0 doesn't exist. So I guess I've got two questions: 1) Where are the ISOs really? 2) Why is the website wrong? -- David Benfell, LCP benfell@parts-unknown.org --- Resume available at http://www.parts-unknown.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 04:28:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8044116A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 04:28:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1185D43D46 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 04:28:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 313215DDA; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 23:28:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 16548-07; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 23:28:29 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-122-227.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.122.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7615D5DD5; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 23:28:29 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43C87DF1.7000809@mac.com> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 23:28:33 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Benfell References: <20060114041524.GA14008@parts-unknown.org> In-Reply-To: <20060114041524.GA14008@parts-unknown.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ummm... Why can't I find the FreeBSD 6.0 ISO images? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 04:28:33 -0000 David Benfell wrote: > It seems like no matter which site I try, I get a message that > pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/6.0 doesn't exist. > > So I guess I've got two questions: > > 1) Where are the ISOs really? They are right here: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/6.0/ ...specificly, you probably want: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/6.0/6.0-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso > 2) Why is the website wrong? DNS not working right for you, perhaps? Bad proxy? Path MTU lossage? PEBCAK? :-) -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 05:11:10 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7337A16A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 05:11:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from benfell@parts-unknown.org) Received: from parts-unknown.org (thunder.cybernude.org [66.93.170.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 09C7743D45 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 05:11:09 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from benfell@parts-unknown.org) Received: (qmail 972 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2006 05:11:11 -0000 Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:11:11 -0800 From: David Benfell To: Chuck Swiger Message-ID: <20060114051111.GA29735@parts-unknown.org> Mail-Followup-To: Chuck Swiger , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060114041524.GA14008@parts-unknown.org> <43C87DF1.7000809@mac.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43C87DF1.7000809@mac.com> X-stardate: [-29]5161.07 X-moon: The Moon is Full User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.7i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, David Benfell Subject: Re: Ummm... Why can't I find the FreeBSD 6.0 ISO images? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 05:11:10 -0000 On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 23:28:33 -0500, Chuck Swiger wrote: > > >2) Why is the website wrong? > > DNS not working right for you, perhaps? > Bad proxy? Path MTU lossage? PEBCAK? :-) > [Sigh] This is what I get for failing to post the *entire* error message. My DNS and network are working fine, but... 16% wget ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/6.0/6.0-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso --21:08:33-- ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/6.0/6.0-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso => `6.0-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso' Resolving ftp.freebsd.org... done. Connecting to ftp.freebsd.org[204.152.184.73]:21... connected. Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in! ==> SYST ... done. ==> PWD ... done. ==> TYPE I ... done. ==> CWD /pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/6.0 ... No such directory `pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/6.0'. -- David Benfell, LCP benfell@parts-unknown.org --- Resume available at http://www.parts-unknown.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 05:16:01 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DD5D16A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 05:16:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E817443D45 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 05:16:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7E121A3C24; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:16:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EE7F154A42; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:15:59 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:15:59 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Chuck Swiger , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060114051559.GA16665@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060114041524.GA14008@parts-unknown.org> <43C87DF1.7000809@mac.com> <20060114051111.GA29735@parts-unknown.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060114051111.GA29735@parts-unknown.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Subject: Re: Ummm... Why can't I find the FreeBSD 6.0 ISO images? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 05:16:01 -0000 --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 09:11:11PM -0800, David Benfell wrote: > On Fri, 13 Jan 2006 23:28:33 -0500, Chuck Swiger wrote: > >=20 > > >2) Why is the website wrong? > >=20 > > DNS not working right for you, perhaps? > > Bad proxy? Path MTU lossage? PEBCAK? :-) > >=20 > [Sigh] This is what I get for failing to post the *entire* error > message. My DNS and network are working fine, but... >=20 > 16% wget ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/6.0/6= .0-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso > --21:08:33-- > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/6.0/6.0-RELEAS= E-i386-disc1.iso > =3D> `6.0-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso' > Resolving ftp.freebsd.org... done. > Connecting to ftp.freebsd.org[204.152.184.73]:21... connected. > Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in! > =3D=3D> SYST ... done. =3D=3D> PWD ... done. > =3D=3D> TYPE I ... done. =3D=3D> CWD > /pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/6.0 ...=20 > No such directory `pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/6.0'. Unable to confirm: wget ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/6.0/6.0-REL= EASE-i386-disc1.iso --00:13:59-- ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/6.= 0/6.0-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso =3D> `6.0-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso' Resolving ftp.freebsd.org... 62.243.72.50, 204.152.184.73, 2001:4f8:0:2::e,= ... Connecting to ftp.freebsd.org|62.243.72.50|:21... connected. Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in! =3D=3D> SYST ... done. =3D=3D> PWD ... done. =3D=3D> TYPE I ... done. =3D=3D> CWD /pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES= /6.0 ... done. =3D=3D> PASV ... done. =3D=3D> RETR 6.0-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso ... done. Length: 578,408,448 (552M) (unauthoritative) 0% [ ] = 88,328 79.57K/s =20 ^C Neither if I use the other IP address, which you used: wget ftp://204.152.184.73/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/6.0/6.0-RELE= ASE-i386-disc1.iso --00:15:02-- ftp://204.152.184.73/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/6.0= /6.0-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso =3D> `6.0-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso.1' Connecting to 204.152.184.73:21... connected. Logging in as anonymous ... Logged in! =3D=3D> SYST ... done. =3D=3D> PWD ... done. =3D=3D> TYPE I ... done. =3D=3D> CWD /pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES= /6.0 ... done. =3D=3D> PASV ... done. =3D=3D> RETR 6.0-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso ... done. Length: 578,408,448 (552M) (unauthoritative) 0% [ ] = 153,240 168.66K/s ^C Kris --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDyIkPWry0BWjoQKURAhUpAKDejVjFq5CFge7IZJ/+Q7oVbfqDbwCgkjMA SUtbCI/tZWE4G+j3y5V/6pc= =bqOc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --d6Gm4EdcadzBjdND-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 05:20:36 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E10B16A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 05:20:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ravi@cow.org) Received: from happy.cow.org (happy.cow.org [208.48.232.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBFAF43D45 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 05:20:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ravi@cow.org) Received: by happy.cow.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1E82982A056; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:20:35 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:20:35 -0500 From: ravi pina To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060114052034.GF44268@happy.cow.org> References: <20060114041524.GA14008@parts-unknown.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060114041524.GA14008@parts-unknown.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i Subject: Re: Ummm... Why can't I find the FreeBSD 6.0 ISO images? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ravi@cow.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 05:20:36 -0000 On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 08:15:24PM -0800, David Benfell said at one point in time: > Hello all, > > It seems like no matter which site I try, I get a message that > pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/6.0 doesn't exist. > > So I guess I've got two questions: > > 1) Where are the ISOs really? > 2) Why is the website wrong? ravi@happy:[ttypc][12:19am](4):101:~> ftp ftp.freebsd.org Trying 62.243.72.50... Connected to ftp.freebsd.org. 220 ftp.FreeBSD.org NcFTPd Server (licensed copy) ready. Name (ftp.freebsd.org:ravi): anonymous 331 Guest login ok, send your complete e-mail address as password. Password: 230-You are user #143 of 1000 simultaneous users allowed. 230- 230 Logged in anonymously. Remote system type is UNIX. Using binary mode to transfer files. ftp> cd /pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/6.0/ 250 "/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/6.0" is new cwd. ftp> ls 227 Entering Passive Mode (62,243,72,50,213,75) 150 Data connection accepted from 208.48.232.100:2935; transfer starting. -rw-r--r-- 1 ftpuser ftpusers 45936640 Nov 3 15:25 6.0-RELEASE-i386-bootonly.iso -rw-r--r-- 1 ftpuser ftpusers 578408448 Nov 3 17:13 6.0-RELEASE-i386-disc1.iso -rw-r--r-- 1 ftpuser ftpusers 682371072 Nov 3 18:45 6.0-RELEASE-i386-disc2.iso -rw-r--r-- 1 ftpuser ftpusers 207 Nov 3 18:45 CHECKSUM.MD5 -rw-r--r-- 1 ftpuser ftpusers 312 Nov 3 18:45 CHECKSUM.SHA256 226 Listing completed. ftp> bye 221 Goodbye. -- +++ATH 7MN; {{{ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 05:38:50 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BEFF16A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 05:38:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from benfell@parts-unknown.org) Received: from parts-unknown.org (thunder.cybernude.org [66.93.170.248]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CD3D743D48 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 05:38:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from benfell@parts-unknown.org) Received: (qmail 8893 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2006 05:38:50 -0000 Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2006 21:38:50 -0800 From: David Benfell To: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20060114053850.GA3491@parts-unknown.org> Mail-Followup-To: Kris Kennaway , Chuck Swiger , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20060114041524.GA14008@parts-unknown.org> <43C87DF1.7000809@mac.com> <20060114051111.GA29735@parts-unknown.org> <20060114051559.GA16665@xor.obsecurity.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060114051559.GA16665@xor.obsecurity.org> X-stardate: [-29]5161.14 X-moon: The Moon is Full User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.7i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ummm... Why can't I find the FreeBSD 6.0 ISO images? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 05:38:50 -0000 On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:15:59 -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > Unable to confirm: > Okay. Now I'm really bewildered. But apparently the problem is on my Mac. On a lark, I tried another system. This one is my OpenBSD system that I use for routing. It's pulling down the ISO just fine. This system is, where I originally tried it, is: Darwin thunder.cybernude.org 8.4.0 Darwin Kernel Version 8.4.0: Tue Jan 3 18:22:10 PST 2006; root:xnu-792.6.56.obj~1/RELEASE_PPC Power Macintosh unknown PowerBook5,1 Darwin And this is where it failed. It has wget version: GNU Wget 1.8.1 Copyright (C) 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 2000, 2001 Free Software Foundation, Inc. This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License for more details. Originally written by Hrvoje Niksic . But ncftp and Safari's invocation of Finder also failed. -- David Benfell, LCP benfell@parts-unknown.org --- Resume available at http://www.parts-unknown.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 05:47:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE93416A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 05:47:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from 1ExeGa-000JNI-Q2@p54803832.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) Received: from p54803832.dip0.t-ipconnect.de (p54803832.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.128.56.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 21F8743D46 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 05:47:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from 1ExeGa-000JNI-Q2@p54803832.dip0.t-ipconnect.de) Received: from kzshlxxfyhz by p54803832.dip0.t-ipconnect.de with local (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) id 1ExeGa-000JNI-Q2 for questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:47:56 +0100 To: questions@freebsd.org From: wvbrpxqmp@lafcu.org Content-Type: text/plain;charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Message-Id: <1ExeGa-000JNI-Q2@p54803832.dip0.t-ipconnect.de> Sender: User kzshlxxfyhz Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:47:56 +0100 Cc: Subject: The best you may make for is to be the #1 lover. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 05:47:58 -0000 The objective of this guide is to save you time and money. http://vzhjdn.r2fbf6wmemxhr9rkwrrkwrrr.passkeyih.com/?etsz I don't care where I sit, as long as I get fed. The man who makes no mistakes does not usually make anything. Temper gets you into trouble. Pride keeps you there. Marriage is a triumph of habit over hate. The ultimate security is your understanding of reality. INJURY, n. An offense next in degree of enormity to a slight. Make service your first priority, not success and success will follow. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 06:00:27 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DE7216A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:00:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bflscala@ee.unimelb.edu.au) Received: from loki.ee.unimelb.edu.au (loki.ee.unimelb.edu.au [128.250.76.73]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08D2943D46 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:00:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bflscala@ee.unimelb.edu.au) Received: from mullian.ee.mu.OZ.AU (mullian.ee.mu.oz.au [128.250.80.1]) by loki.ee.unimelb.edu.au (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id k0E60AQR029963 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:00:10 +1100 (EST) Received: from csp-03560.ee.mu.oz.au (csp-03560.ee.mu.oz.au [172.16.17.70]) by mullian.ee.mu.OZ.AU (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id k0E604S02250 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:00:04 +1100 (EST) Received: (from bflscala@localhost) by csp-03560.ee.mu.oz.au (8.13.1/8.13.1/Submit) id k0E604MD021120; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:00:04 +1100 From: Barbara La-Scala MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17352.37732.763165.511749@csp-03560.ee.mu.oz.au> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:00:04 +1100 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: VM 7.18 under Emacs 21.3.1 Subject: Problem setting up PPPoE in Release 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: b.lascala@ee.unimelb.edu.au List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:00:27 -0000 I have a Netcomm NB1300 modem and a Realtek 8029 ethernet card and was successful at configuring PPPoE for this combination under R5.3. I've recently upgraded to R6.0 and cannot get things to work any more. I've played with all the options in the ppp.conf that looked relevant (and several that didn't) and I've compiled the NETGRAPH stuff into my kernel but still no go. I've googled but without success. I've tripled checked that I've got my username and password entered correctly. I know the modem is OK as I'm using it to post this (hooked up to a laptop with Windoze). I'm reluctant to return to R5.3 as I'm enjoying having a working sound card. However, I need internet access more. Any help would be greatly appreciated as I'm all out of ideas. Configuration details are below. Thanks Barbara FreeBSD reports my Ethernet card is ed0: port 0xd000-0xd01f irq 12 at device 9.0 on pci0 ed0: type NE2000 (16 bit) My /etc/rc.conf looks like ifconfig_ed0="up" ppp_enable="YES" ppp_mode="ddial" ppp_profile="netspace" My /etc/ppp/ppp.conf (with password deleted) is default: set log All netspace: set device PPPoE:ed0 set authname ******@netspace.net.au set authkey ******** set dial set login set ifaddr 10.0.0.1/0 10.0.0.2/0 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0 add default HISADDR The ppp.log file reports Phase: Using interface: tun0 Phase: deflink: Created in closed state tun0: ID0: 0x282e62c0 = fopen("/etc/ppp/ppp.conf", "r") tun0: Debug: ReadSystem: Checking netspace (/etc/ppp/ppp.conf). tun0: Command: netspace: set device PPPoE:ed0 tun0: Command: netspace: set authname ******@netspace.net.au tun0: Command: netspace: set authkey ******** tun0: Command: netspace: set dial tun0: Command: netspace: set login tun0: Command: netspace: set ifaddr 10.0.0.1/0 10.0.0.2/0 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0 tun0: Command: netspace: add default HISADDR tun0: ID0: 9 = socket(17, 3, 0) tun0: ID0: -1 = write(9, data, 140) tun0: TCP/IP: rt_Set failure: tun0: TCP/IP: rt_Set: Cmd = Add tun0: TCP/IP: rt_Set: Dst = 0.0.0.0/0 tun0: TCP/IP: rt_Set: Gateway = 10.0.0.2 tun0: Debug: wrote -1: cmd = Add, dst = 0.0.0.0/0, gateway = 10.0.0.2 tun0: ID0: 0x282e62c0 = fopen("/var/run/tun0.pid", "w") tun0: Phase: PPP Started (ddial mode). tun0: Phase: bundle: Establish tun0: Phase: deflink: closed -> opening tun0: ID0: 0 = NgMkSockNode("", &cs, &ds) tun0: Debug: List of netgraph node ``ed0:'' (id 1) hooks: tun0: Debug: Found orphans -> ethernet tun0: Debug: Connecting netgraph socket .:tun0 -> [3]::tun0 tun0: ID0: 2 = socket(2, 2, 0) tun0: ID0: 0 = ioctl(2, 3223349521, 0xbfbfde10) tun0: ID0: 0 = ioctl(2, 2149607696, 0xbfbfde10) tun0: Debug: Sending PPPOE_CONNECT to .:tun0 tun0: Debug: Found the following interfaces: tun0: Debug: Index 1, name "ed0" tun0: Debug: Index 2, name "plip0" tun0: Debug: Index 3, name "lo0" tun0: Debug: Index 4, name "tun0" tun0: Timer: timer_Start: Inserting physical throughput timer[0x80bc068] tun0: Phase: deflink: Connected! tun0: Phase: deflink: opening -> dial tun0: Phase: deflink: dial -> carrier tun0: Debug: Waiting for carrier tun0: Timer: Select returns -1 tun0: Timer: ---- Begin of Timer Service List--- tun0: Timer: physical throughput timer[0x80bc068]: freq = 1.00s, next = 0.00s, state = running tun0: Timer: ---- End of Timer Service List --- tun0: Timer: timer_Start: Inserting physical throughput timer[0x80bc068] tun0: Debug: Waiting for carrier tun0: Timer: Select returns -1 tun0: Timer: ---- Begin of Timer Service List--- tun0: Timer: physical throughput timer[0x80bc068]: freq = 1.00s, next = 0.00s, state = running tun0: Timer: ---- End of Timer Service List --- tun0: Timer: timer_Start: Inserting physical throughput timer[0x80bc068] tun0: Debug: Waiting for carrier tun0: Timer: Select returns -1 tun0: Timer: ---- Begin of Timer Service List--- tun0: Timer: physical throughput timer[0x80bc068]: freq = 1.00s, next = 0.00s, state = running tun0: Timer: ---- End of Timer Service List --- tun0: Timer: timer_Start: Inserting physical throughput timer[0x80bc068] tun0: Debug: Waiting for carrier tun0: Timer: Select returns -1 tun0: Timer: ---- Begin of Timer Service List--- tun0: Timer: physical throughput timer[0x80bc068]: freq = 1.00s, next = 0.00s, state = running tun0: Timer: ---- End of Timer Service List --- tun0: Timer: timer_Start: Inserting physical throughput timer[0x80bc068] tun0: Debug: Waiting for carrier tun0: Timer: Select returns -1 tun0: Timer: ---- Begin of Timer Service List--- tun0: Timer: physical throughput timer[0x80bc068]: freq = 1.00s, next = 0.00s, state = running tun0: Timer: ---- End of Timer Service List --- tun0: Timer: timer_Start: Inserting physical throughput timer[0x80bc068] tun0: Phase: deflink: Disconnected! tun0: Phase: deflink: carrier -> hangup tun0: Debug: deflink: Close tun0: Phase: deflink: Connect time: 5 secs: 0 octets in, 0 octets out tun0: Phase: deflink: 0 packets in, 0 packets out tun0: Phase: total 0 bytes/sec, peak 0 bytes/sec on Sat Jan 14 14:22:33 2006 -- Dr Barbara La Scala E-mail: b.lascala@ee.unimelb.edu.au Dept of Electrical & Electronic Engineering University of Melbourne, VIC 3010 Tel: +61 (3) 8344-3934 Australia Fax: +61 (3) 8344-6678 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 06:05:13 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27B8716A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:05:13 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C93E643D46 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:05:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACEB51A3C1C; Fri, 13 Jan 2006 22:05:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 0A65754A42; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 01:05:12 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 01:05:11 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Kris Kennaway , Chuck Swiger , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060114060511.GA17650@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060114041524.GA14008@parts-unknown.org> <43C87DF1.7000809@mac.com> <20060114051111.GA29735@parts-unknown.org> <20060114051559.GA16665@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060114053850.GA3491@parts-unknown.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060114053850.GA3491@parts-unknown.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: Subject: Re: Ummm... Why can't I find the FreeBSD 6.0 ISO images? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:05:13 -0000 --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jan 13, 2006 at 09:38:50PM -0800, David Benfell wrote: > On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:15:59 -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >=20 > > Unable to confirm: > >=20 > >=20 > Okay. Now I'm really bewildered. But apparently the problem is on my > Mac. >=20 > On a lark, I tried another system. This one is my OpenBSD system that > I use for routing. It's pulling down the ISO just fine. >=20 > This system is, where I originally tried it, is: >=20 > Darwin thunder.cybernude.org 8.4.0 Darwin Kernel Version 8.4.0: Tue Jan = 3 18:22:10 PST 2006; root:xnu-792.6.56.obj~1/RELEASE_PPC Power Macintosh un= known PowerBook5,1 Darwin >=20 > And this is where it failed. It has wget version: >=20 > GNU Wget 1.8.1 >=20 > Copyright (C) 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 2000, 2001 Free Software Foundation= , Inc. > This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, > but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the > GNU General Public License for more details. >=20 > Originally written by Hrvoje Niksic . >=20 > But ncftp and Safari's invocation of Finder also failed. Try to verify with e.g. tcpdump on another machine on the LAN segment that it is actually communicating with the right machine, and it (or something like a transparent proxy in between) is not somehow rewriting the FTP stream. Kris --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDyJSXWry0BWjoQKURAlaaAKCNxDlI8xLKKXneYZqnZRqjPs1OAgCghBTL UBWe3IovyJyXZr/ZzaQZhJ8= =B1Qs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fdj2RfSjLxBAspz7-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 06:32:35 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E30A716A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:32:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rowdy@netspace.net.au) Received: from mail.netspace.net.au (cumulus.netspace.net.au [203.10.110.72]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79D3A43D48 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:32:35 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rowdy@netspace.net.au) Received: from [192.168.2.7] (220-253-38-72.VIC.netspace.net.au [220.253.38.72]) by mail.netspace.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id B87C47C886; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:32:30 +1100 (EST) Message-ID: <43C89AFE.30305@netspace.net.au> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:32:30 +1100 From: Rowdy User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: b.lascala@ee.unimelb.edu.au References: <17352.37732.763165.511749@csp-03560.ee.mu.oz.au> In-Reply-To: <17352.37732.763165.511749@csp-03560.ee.mu.oz.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem setting up PPPoE in Release 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:32:36 -0000 Barbara La-Scala wrote: > I have a Netcomm NB1300 modem and a Realtek 8029 ethernet card and > was successful at configuring PPPoE for this combination under R5.3. > I've recently upgraded to R6.0 and cannot get things to work any > more. > > I've played with all the options in the ppp.conf that looked relevant > (and several that didn't) and I've compiled the NETGRAPH stuff into > my kernel but still no go. I've googled but without success. I've > tripled checked that I've got my username and password entered > correctly. I know the modem is OK as I'm using it to post this > (hooked up to a laptop with Windoze). > > I'm reluctant to return to R5.3 as I'm enjoying having a working > sound card. However, I need internet access more. Any help would be > greatly appreciated as I'm all out of ideas. > > Configuration details are below. > > Thanks Barbara > I have a similar setup: FreeBSD 6, Netcomm NB1300 Plus 4, Netspace. Occasionally it fails to connect while waiting for carrier, as yours seems to have done. If I try to connect again, it usually succeeds. I would suggest making a second attempt to connect, if that fails, power cycle the modem and try again. If it still won't connect, then there might be a bigger problem. I also have option "set cd 10" in my ppp.conf that sets a 10 second delay waiting for carrier (FreeBSD checks for carrier once per second until timeout) - I don't know if that makes any difference. Rowdy From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 07:24:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C94016A420 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 07:24:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: from lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (mail.bathnetworks.com [84.92.24.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5B7E43D46 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 07:23:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bsd@bathnetworks.com) Received: (qmail 9241 invoked by uid 510); 14 Jan 2006 07:27:33 +0000 Received: from 84.92.24.252 by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk (envelope-from , uid 508) with qmail-scanner-1.24-st-qms (clamdscan: 0.87/1146. spamassassin: 3.0.2. perlscan: 1.24-st-qms. Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-3.9/5.0):. Processed in 2.634532 secs); 14 Jan 2006 07:27:33 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.9 required=5.0 X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN-Mail-From: bsd@bathnetworks.com via lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk X-Antivirus-MYDOMAIN: 1.24-st-qms (Clear:RC:0(84.92.24.252):SA:0(-3.9/5.0):. Processed in 2.634532 secs Process 9234) Received: from mail.bathnetworks.com (HELO ?84.92.24.252?) (bsd@bathnetworks.com@84.92.24.252) by lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk with SMTP; 14 Jan 2006 07:27:31 +0000 From: Robert Slade To: je killen In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain Message-Id: <1137223650.8726.30.camel@lmail.bathnetworks.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.6 (1.4.6-2) Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 07:27:30 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Re FreeBSD v 6.0 (boxed cd set) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 07:24:00 -0000 On Sat, 2006-01-14 at 01:01, je killen wrote: > (On e-Machine with Intel Sempron processor and 256 mb memory). > I'm not able to log into x via kdm as root and not able to su to root > when in Gnome (or KDE for that matter). > It also goes through what seem to be excessive sleep cycles (two > lasting at least a minute apiece) during the boot process > to establish the system's name. Sounds like it is trying to contact a dhcp server and then timing out. What does messages or your error logs say? They are in /var/logs > It refused ssh from my Mac OSX machine (It starts sshd on boot, which > also takes a noticeable amount of time) Check your sshd setup, see man sshd, there are some defaults set in the conf file there which are causing the restriction. > What ftp server is recommended for FreeBSD? (There doesn't seem to be > any provided by default install) You should have been asked if you wanted a ftp server during installation. The default is ftp. There are others in the ports though. See the handbook. > How do I tell it who it really is? (Is it trying to contact a DNS > server and/or /etc/hosts ?) The host name etc is set in /etc/rc.conf. Again you should have set this during installation. You can re run the installation process just type sysinstall. > How can I get set up to su to root in a console window? (Or do I have > to learn to live with it?) The default allows only members of the wheel group to su to root. > If I can't get set up to su to root in a console window, how can I log > into an x session as root? You should be able to log on as root and run an x session as root (not recommended). > (Does it have to do with security levels, or who is a member of the > 'wheel' group? Even Mac OSX only allows sudo -- and it is based on > FreeBSD, isn't it?) See above. There could also be an issue with security, it depends how you set it during install. > > Thanks > JK > This is definitely the most active list I've subscribed to (203 total > e-mail load yesterday when usually 30 -50 per day with 3 other tech > related list subscriptions) JK Welcome, >From your questions you are new :-), I was some 5 months ago. Most of the answers can be got from the handbook. I've tried to give you some pointers to help, but not too much as you do need to become familiar with the basics. There are a number of resources about, Google helps too. Be prepared for a number of reinstalls :-). A couple of pointers - try asking one question at a time and use a meaningful subject. That way your problem is likely to standout in the number of messages. I would also suggest that we you get the basic system working, you update it, your CDs are likely to be at 6.0R there has been some updates since. I would suggest that you stay with the 6.0 branch for now. Good luck. Rob From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 07:37:37 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D8A616A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 07:37:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from pi.codefab.com (pi.codefab.com [199.103.21.227]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A94C843D45 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 07:37:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FA305F3D; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 02:37:36 -0500 (EST) Received: from pi.codefab.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (pi.codefab.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 76548-05; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 02:37:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (pool-68-161-122-227.ny325.east.verizon.net [68.161.122.227]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pi.codefab.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E7AC5D62; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 02:37:35 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <43C8AA45.4040101@mac.com> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 02:37:41 -0500 From: Chuck Swiger Organization: The Courts of Chaos User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (Windows/20050923) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Benfell References: <20060114041524.GA14008@parts-unknown.org> <43C87DF1.7000809@mac.com> <20060114051111.GA29735@parts-unknown.org> <20060114051559.GA16665@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060114053850.GA3491@parts-unknown.org> In-Reply-To: <20060114053850.GA3491@parts-unknown.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at codefab.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: Ummm... Why can't I find the FreeBSD 6.0 ISO images? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 07:37:37 -0000 David Benfell wrote: > On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:15:59 -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote: >> Unable to confirm: > > > > Okay. Now I'm really bewildered. But apparently the problem is on my > Mac. > > On a lark, I tried another system. This one is my OpenBSD system that > I use for routing. It's pulling down the ISO just fine. [ ... ] > But ncftp and Safari's invocation of Finder also failed. Your wget attempt seemed to use active-mode FTP, which doesn't traverse some firewalls; you might also try "ifconfig en0 mtu 1400" and see whether that does anything helpful... -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 08:07:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C97CB16A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 08:07:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from qus2@go2.pl) Received: from poczta.o2.pl (mx.go2.pl [193.17.41.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5533243D45 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 08:07:10 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from qus2@go2.pl) Received: from host35-ursus.spray.net.pl (host35-ursus.spray.net.pl [83.143.43.35]) by poczta.o2.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76111137694 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:07:07 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:06:58 +0100 From: =?windows-1250?Q?Przemys=B3aw_Szczygielski?= X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.51.10) Professional Organization: QUS X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1467968393.20060114090658@go2.pl> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1250 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: ndis.ko and if_ndis.ko not compiled during buildkernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?windows-1250?Q?Przemys=B3aw_Szczygielski?= List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 08:07:11 -0000 Hello, I am setting up a wiereless network at home, using D-Link DWL-G520+ and ndis wrapper (project Evil) on FreeBSD machine. It works great with default FreeBSD 6.0 installation - no problems here, but I have to compile IPSEC into kernel to get proper encryption. Unfortunately, new kernel doesn't have ndis.ko and if_ndis.ko in /boot/kernel directory (and old modules don't work with new kernel). Yesterday I emailed Project Evil author and he claims ndis.ko and if_ndis.ko should be rebuilt automatically by: >Would it kill you do just do a regular kernel build? > ># cd /sys/i386/conf ># config MYKERNEL ># cd /sys/i386/compile/MYKERNEL ># make ># make install > >Notice how all the kernel modules get compiled for you, including ndis.ko and >if_ndis.ko. If you'd really read and understood that article, you would have >realized that you don't need to rebuild them for each driver anymore. You >just need to convert the .sys and .inf files with ndisgen. That's it. Well - they don't get built (at least for me). Is anyone able to tell me how to get these? (note: ndisgen generates only card driver, NOT ndis.ko and if_ndis.ko!, also the old way won't work!) TIA, Przemek From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 09:25:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8B6A16A47B for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:25:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: from smtp1.versatel.nl (smtp1.versatel.nl [62.58.50.88]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3A4643D45 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:25:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 15782 invoked by uid 0); 14 Jan 2006 09:25:19 -0000 Received: from ip176-173-59-62.adsl.versatel.nl (HELO [192.168.2.5]) ([62.59.173.176]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp1.versatel.nl (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for < >; 14 Jan 2006 09:25:19 -0000 Message-ID: <43C8C3A4.8040601@gmx.net> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 10:25:56 +0100 From: Frank Staals User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20060105) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?windows-1250?Q?Przemys=B3aw_Szczygielski?= References: <1467968393.20060114090658@go2.pl> In-Reply-To: <1467968393.20060114090658@go2.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1250; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ndis.ko and if_ndis.ko not compiled during buildkernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:25:23 -0000 Przemys³aw Szczygielski wrote: >Hello, > >I am setting up a wiereless network at home, using D-Link DWL-G520+ and >ndis wrapper (project Evil) on FreeBSD machine. It works great with >default FreeBSD 6.0 installation - no problems here, but I have to >compile IPSEC into kernel to get proper encryption. Unfortunately, new >kernel doesn't have ndis.ko and if_ndis.ko in /boot/kernel directory >(and old modules don't work with new kernel). > >Yesterday I emailed Project Evil author and he claims ndis.ko and >if_ndis.ko should be rebuilt automatically by: > > > >>Would it kill you do just do a regular kernel build? >> >># cd /sys/i386/conf >># config MYKERNEL >># cd /sys/i386/compile/MYKERNEL >># make >># make install >> >>Notice how all the kernel modules get compiled for you, including ndis.ko and >>if_ndis.ko. If you'd really read and understood that article, you would have >>realized that you don't need to rebuild them for each driver anymore. You >>just need to convert the .sys and .inf files with ndisgen. That's it. >> >> > >Well - they don't get built (at least for me). Is anyone able to tell me how to >get these? (note: ndisgen generates only card driver, NOT ndis.ko and >if_ndis.ko!, also the old way won't work!) > >TIA, > >Przemek > > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > You can most probably just copy the files back from /boot/kernel.old/ ( or run locate ndis.ko to see where they can be find ) that should work Good luck, -- -Frank Staals From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 09:53:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F6B16A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:53:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gollum123@free.fr) Received: from smtp1-g19.free.fr (smtp1-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E32443D45 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:53:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gollum123@free.fr) Received: from [192.168.0.140] (tui75-2-82-229-178-102.fbx.proxad.net [82.229.178.102]) by smtp1-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53DAE6E384 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 10:53:09 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 10:53:11 +0100 From: Mathieu CHATEAU X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.62.12) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <822293652.20060114105311@free.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: portupgrade from bin 9.3.1 to 9.3.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mathieu CHATEAU List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:53:11 -0000 Hello, i have done a portupgrade -Rr bind9 on a server. bind 9.3.1 was in /usr/sbin/named, but bind 9.3.2 is in /usr/local/sbin/named Now, i have 2 bind9 version on the same system... any way to cleanup ? did i miss something ? Thanks, Mathieu CHATEAU From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 10:44:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B738216A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 10:44:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gollum123@free.fr) Received: from smtp4-g19.free.fr (smtp4-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6236A43D48 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 10:44:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gollum123@free.fr) Received: from [192.168.0.140] (tui75-2-82-229-178-102.fbx.proxad.net [82.229.178.102]) by smtp4-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D474ED48 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:44:56 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:44:56 +0100 From: Mathieu CHATEAU X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.62.12) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1710605913.20060114114456@free.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: upgrade of php5-gd X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mathieu CHATEAU List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 10:44:57 -0000 Hello freebsd-questions, even with a cvsup of ports 5 minutes ago, i still have the following errors when i try to upgrade php5-gd from 5.0.4_2 to 5.1.1 [root@######:/usr/ports/graphics/php5-gd] # make install clean ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found ===> Found saved configuration for php5-gd-5.0.4_2 ===> Extracting for php5-gd-5.1.1 => MD5 Checksum OK for php-5.1.1.tar.bz2. ===> Patching for php5-gd-5.1.1 ===> Applying FreeBSD patches for php5-gd-5.1.1 1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to config.m4.rej => Patch patch-config.m4 failed to apply cleanly. *** Error code 1 I am using FreeBSD 5.4 any clue ? thanks! Mathieu CHATEAU From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 10:53:38 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2621116A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 10:53:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from don@lizardhill.com) Received: from bigbird.whtech.com (bigbird.whtech.com [64.125.72.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D1DBE43D45 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 10:53:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from don@lizardhill.com) Received: (qmail 40501 invoked by uid 0); 14 Jan 2006 10:52:31 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mickey) (unknown) by unknown with SMTP; 14 Jan 2006 10:52:31 -0000 From: "Don O'Neil" To: Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 02:53:39 -0800 Message-ID: <003301c618f8$c712ec60$0b00020a@mickey> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2670 Thread-Index: AcYY+MbsNyU/gXmQQOyQme7rcqjinw== Subject: Setquota on FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 10:53:38 -0000 I'm having problems getting the port 'setquota' to work on my FBSD 4.11 box... When I type: setquota -g -f /array01 -bh51200K root I get setquota : /array01 does not have quotas enabled. Or when I type: setquota -u -f /array01 -bh51200K root I get setquota : GETQUOTA(root) - Invalid argument Even though I have built the kernel w/ the option, enabled quotas in rc, etc... quota -v shows: Disk quotas for user root (uid 0): Filesystem usage quota limit grace files quota limit grace /array01 0 0 0 0 0 0 I can edit quotas using edquota no problems. I had to build setquota from sources, as the port package for 4.11 isn't available anymore. Any ideas what might be going on here? Don From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 10:53:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DB4C16A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 10:53:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pirat@access.inet.co.th) Received: from access.inet.co.th (access.inet.co.th [203.151.127.252]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D376943D45 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 10:53:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pirat@access.inet.co.th) Received: from [192.168.1.71] ([203.113.32.9]) by access.inet.co.th (8.12.9p2/8.12.9) with ESMTP id k0EAr1rl038454 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:53:03 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from pirat@access.inet.co.th) Message-ID: <43C8D827.1070504@access.inet.co.th> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:53:27 +0700 From: Pirat SRIYOTHA User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.10) Gecko/20050826 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.600 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 10:53:40 -0000 hi sirs, while doing make in gnome2, i face this error /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.600" not found required by gdk-pixbuf-qurey-loaders it stopped at librsvg2. in my machine i found only libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.400. my machine is inspiron# uname -a FreeBSD inspiron.thai-aec.org 6.0-STABLE FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE #2: Fri Jan 13 13:52:56 ICT 2006 root@inspiron.thai-aec.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/INSPIRON i386 inspiron# i tried to install gnome 2.12 so many time since december 2005. please cc to me since i do not a member of this list. TIA with best regards, psr From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 10:55:56 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5928016A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 10:55:56 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from qus2@go2.pl) Received: from poczta.o2.pl (mx.go2.pl [193.17.41.41]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32D4A43D5C for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 10:55:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from qus2@go2.pl) Received: from host35-ursus.spray.net.pl (host35-ursus.spray.net.pl [83.143.43.35]) by poczta.o2.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C09D1377FF for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:55:47 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:55:46 +0100 From: =?windows-1250?Q?Przemys=B3aw_Szczygielski?= X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.51.10) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <896595122.20060114115546@go2.pl> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <43C8C3A4.8040601@gmx.net> References: <1467968393.20060114090658@go2.pl> <43C8C3A4.8040601@gmx.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1250 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: ndis.ko and if_ndis.ko not compiled during buildkernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?windows-1250?Q?Przemys=B3aw_Szczygielski?= List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 10:55:56 -0000 > I am setting up a wiereless network at home, using D-Link DWL-G520+ and > ndis wrapper (project Evil) on FreeBSD machine. It works great with > default FreeBSD 6.0 installation - no problems here, but I have to > compile IPSEC into kernel to get proper encryption. Unfortunately, new > kernel doesn't have ndis.ko and if_ndis.ko in /boot/kernel directory > (and old modules don't work with new kernel). > Yesterday I emailed Project Evil author and he claims ndis.ko and > if_ndis.ko should be rebuilt automatically by: > > > Would it kill you do just do a regular kernel build? > # cd /sys/i386/conf > # config MYKERNEL > # cd /sys/i386/compile/MYKERNEL > # make > # make install > Notice how all the kernel modules get compiled for you, including ndis.ko and > if_ndis.ko. If you'd really read and understood that article, you would have > realized that you don't need to rebuild them for each driver anymore. You > just need to convert the .sys and .inf files with ndisgen. That's it. > > > Well - they don't get built (at least for me). Is anyone able to tell me how to > get these? (note: ndisgen generates only card driver, NOT ndis.ko and > if_ndis.ko!, also the old way won't work!) > > You can most probably just copy the files back from > /boot/kernel.old/ ( or run locate ndis.ko to see where they can be find ) that should work > Nope, old modules just kill my kernel! That's the problem! I already tried that! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 11:03:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9456B16A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:03:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dominique.goncalves@gmail.com) Received: from uproxy.gmail.com (uproxy.gmail.com [66.249.92.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5E8843D46 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:03:48 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dominique.goncalves@gmail.com) Received: by uproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id o2so147847uge for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 03:03:47 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=TM8yy3kVaS+NYwfXUnws8lYBk6pnjaOEQLbrCc6QQ1pvjLrCNSOKvUuY/vqcX4pc04CZ2PQWY8CkDUl2N0XppUKlexUB9LyNiSL/OavuPSxSTNA22KjZFjENwT4GfnHPx/4N6lgsaVWUNV8RpW0kEZwO6qhFr/441e/MnK1nFUM= Received: by 10.49.54.3 with SMTP id g3mr131194nfk; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 03:03:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.48.157.16 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 03:03:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <7daacbbe0601140303p207b7a64x6d3e39042db34272@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 12:03:47 +0100 From: Dominique Goncalves To: Mathieu CHATEAU In-Reply-To: <822293652.20060114105311@free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <822293652.20060114105311@free.fr> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: portupgrade from bin 9.3.1 to 9.3.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:03:49 -0000 Hi, On 1/14/06, Mathieu CHATEAU wrote: > Hello, > > i have done a portupgrade -Rr bind9 on a server. > > bind 9.3.1 was in /usr/sbin/named, but > bind 9.3.2 is in /usr/local/sbin/named > > Now, i have 2 bind9 version on the same system... > > any way to cleanup ? did i miss something ? pkg_delete the bind 9.3.2 port installation, and install bind 9.3.2 with this option WITH_PORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND9=3DYES in your make.conf HTH. > > Thanks, > Mathieu CHATEAU Regards. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > -- There's this old saying: "Give a man a fish, feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish, feed him for life." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 13:18:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7EFD16A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 13:18:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lauasanf@wilderness.homeip.net) Received: from mxsf23.cluster1.charter.net (mxsf23.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.223]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C6CF43D45 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 13:18:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from lauasanf@wilderness.homeip.net) Received: from mxip06a.cluster1.charter.net (mxip06a.cluster1.charter.net [209.225.28.136]) by mxsf23.cluster1.charter.net (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id k0EDIWtq030102 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 08:18:32 -0500 Received: from 24-183-196-66.dhcp.jcsn.tn.charter.com (HELO [192.168.1.6]) ([24.183.196.66]) by mxip06a.cluster1.charter.net with ESMTP; 14 Jan 2006 08:18:32 -0500 X-IronPort-AV: i="3.99,367,1131339600"; d="scan'208"; a="1844806925:sNHT22236554" Message-ID: <43C8F379.4050001@wilderness.homeip.net> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 06:50:01 -0600 From: Laurence Sanford User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051224) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Unable to make buildkernel (fresh cvsup to RELENG_6) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 13:18:34 -0000 I'm upgrading a 5.4 machine to 6. I can buildworld successfully, but attempting to make buildkernel fails: HEADERS -I. -I@ -I@/contrib/altq -I@/../include -I/usr/include -I/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/Colossus /usr/src/sys/modules/ti/../../pci/if_ti.c /usr/src/sys/modules/ti/../../pci/if_ti.c:2536:35: macro "VLAN_INPUT_TAG" requires 4 arguments, but only 3 given mkdep: compile failed *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules/ti. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src/sys/modules. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/obj/usr/src/sys/Colossus. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/src. Yes, it's a customer kernel, however, it's worth noting that GENERIC has failed in exactly the same place with the same error. Any suggestions? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 13:22:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 604E116A420 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 13:22:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from home_post01@yahoo.co.jp) Received: from web3305.mail.bbt.yahoo.co.jp (web3305.mail.bbt.yahoo.co.jp [202.93.90.42]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E967A43D46 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 13:22:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from home_post01@yahoo.co.jp) Received: (qmail 5869 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Jan 2006 13:22:25 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=yj20050223; d=yahoo.co.jp; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=cZH3p9lMc0aTmVKzZesbNBHs0DheSdSimr9awiz3KoNKr0VyPFoYhi2DllJhLs9gm/wTFbnCX9SATBU6jmYtNJaQqv9uUiTzXKXFfbGeBjfQWa/SUKgjyf2v+BAsF4p+ ; Message-ID: <20060114132225.5867.qmail@web3305.mail.bbt.yahoo.co.jp> Received: from [220.150.165.93] by web3305.mail.bbt.yahoo.co.jp via HTTP; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:22:25 JST Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:22:25 +0900 (JST) From: n-n To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp Subject: It is old. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 13:22:29 -0000 Everyone says that FreeBSD is old. Hereafter, many people will say that Linux and OpenSolaris are good. -------------------------------------- Yahoo! Mail - supported by 10million people http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/mail_pr/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 13:33:28 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CED016A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 13:33:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from home_post01@yahoo.co.jp) Received: from web3301.mail.bbt.yahoo.co.jp (web3301.mail.bbt.yahoo.co.jp [202.93.90.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 821CB43D45 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 13:33:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from home_post01@yahoo.co.jp) Received: (qmail 64178 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Jan 2006 13:33:26 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=yj20050223; d=yahoo.co.jp; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=rkQfdVdQ0+Il2VZVS1Hlamwis+lW9VmzJiF0Rnnt8nR24vKFgEQn1GGxTfDvLqaybIsZyDBb9B2Z7Hl9CIH6Nynsv6jSpNKjATSKP/o/kreNoH6/NdqDlPdSQ50Jlba1 ; Message-ID: <20060114133326.64176.qmail@web3301.mail.bbt.yahoo.co.jp> Received: from [220.150.165.93] by web3301.mail.bbt.yahoo.co.jp via HTTP; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:33:26 JST Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:33:26 +0900 (JST) From: n-n To: questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp Cc: Subject: OS use rate X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 13:33:28 -0000 OS use rate in my project. 2005/01/10 - 2006/01/10 RedHat Enterprise Linux ES3.0 - 3947 RedHat Enterprise Linux AS3.0 - 1287 Sun Solaris 9 - 583 *BSD - 0 -------------------------------------- Yahoo! Mail - supported by 10million people http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/mail_pr/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 14:04:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F211B16A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:04:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from strange.daemonsecurity.com (59.Red-81-33-11.staticIP.rima-tde.net [81.33.11.59]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0837043D48 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:04:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from norgaard@locolomo.org) Received: from [172.16.2.1] (unknown [172.16.2.1]) by strange.daemonsecurity.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A08622E0A7; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:04:05 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <43C904D3.1090001@locolomo.org> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:04:03 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Erik_N=F8rgaard?= Organization: Locolomo.ORG User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.6 (X11/20050909) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Maxim Vetrov References: <43C81E6D.5010702@mail.ru> <43C7B4A6.9040004@locolomo.org> <43C848CB.2020809@mail.ru> In-Reply-To: <43C848CB.2020809@mail.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: dhclient fixed leases X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:04:08 -0000 Maxim Vetrov wrote: > I'm on 6.0 release. The "default" will not help - I have several > networks without dhcpd. So 'default option routers 10.0.1.5;' will work > only for one and fail for others. Well, in that case I have dificult seeing how fixed leases will help you, how should dhclient choose which fixed lease to use? One fixed lease or one default would work. Otherwise, it seems that you should create a script that interactively lets you log on a particular network, and start dhclient if needed or configure your nic with a fixed ip using ifconfig. Regards, Erik -- Ph: +34.666334818 web: http://www.locolomo.org S/MIME Certificate: http://www.locolomo.org/crt/2004071206.crt Subject ID: A9:76:7A:ED:06:95:2B:8D:48:97:CE:F2:3F:42:C8:F2:22:DE:4C:B9 Fingerprint: 4A:E8:63:38:46:F6:9A:5D:B4:DC:29:41:3F:62:D3:0A:73:25:67:C2 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 14:45:44 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8543D16A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:45:44 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from osl1smout1.broadpark.no (osl1smout1.broadpark.no [80.202.4.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12EC543D46 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:45:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vaaf@broadpark.no) Received: from broadpark.no ([217.13.4.96]) by osl1smout1.broadpark.no (Sun Java System Messaging Server 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004)) with ESMTP id <0IT300CPH7WPS680@osl1smout1.broadpark.no> for questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:50:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from [80.202.4.61] (Forwarded-For: [213.187.181.70]) by bgo1mstore1.broadpark.no (mshttpd); Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:45:51 +0100 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:45:51 +0100 From: Kristian Vaaf To: pete wright Message-id: <770bfcc11031.43c91caf@broadpark.no> MIME-version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Sun Java(tm) System Messenger Express 6.1 HotFix 0.05 (built Oct 21 2004) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-language: en Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline X-Accept-Language: en Priority: normal Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Script to lock the state of my MP3 files X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:45:44 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- From: pete wright Date: Friday, January 13, 2006 10:37 pm Subject: Re: Script to lock the state of my MP3 files > On 1/13/06, Kristian Vaaf wrote: > > > > Hello! > > > > I use this script to generate simple verification files (SFV) and > MP3 playlist files (M3U) > > based on the info file (NFO) that I create for every album that I > digitalize.> > > If this is an album: > > > > ./dj_antoine-arabian_adventure-sessp010-vinyl-2005: > > 00-dj_antoine-arabian_adventure-sessp010-vinyl-2005.nfo > > 00-dj_antoine-arabian_adventure-sessp010-vinyl-2005-cover.jpg > > a1-dj_antoine-arabian_adventure_2-original_mix.mp3 > > b1-dj_antoine-arabian_adventure_2- > chriss_ortega_and_thomas_gold_vocal_mix.mp3> b2-dj_antoine- > arabian_adventure_2-chriss_ortega_and_thomas_gold_dub_mix.mp3 > > > > Then the script makes it into: > > > > ./dj_antoine-arabian_adventure-sessp010-vinyl-2005: > > 00-dj_antoine-arabian_adventure-sessp010-vinyl-2005.m3u > > 00-dj_antoine-arabian_adventure-sessp010-vinyl-2005.nfo > > 00-dj_antoine-arabian_adventure-sessp010-vinyl-2005.sfv > > 00-dj_antoine-arabian_adventure-sessp010-vinyl-2005-cover.jpg > > a1-dj_antoine-arabian_adventure_2-original_mix.mp3 > > b1-dj_antoine-arabian_adventure_2- > chriss_ortega_and_thomas_gold_vocal_mix.mp3> b2-dj_antoine- > arabian_adventure_2-chriss_ortega_and_thomas_gold_dub_mix.mp3 > > > > My script is made for regular sh though. > > If it were to be bashed -- how would it look like? > > should be the same syntax for sh and bash as bash is a decendant of > sh. i would keep the #! line /bin/sh as this will make the script > more portable. > > -pete > > > > > #!/bin/sh > > # > > # Generate SFV and M3U files for MP3 albums. > > # $URBAN: mp3_archive.sh,v 1.0 2005/10/24 15:09:05 vaaf Exp $ > > # > > > > for file in `find $(pwd) -name \*.nfo`; do > > > > directory="`dirname ${file}`" > > prefix="`basename ${file} | sed 's/.nfo//g'`" > > current="`basename ${directory}`" > > > > sfv="${directory}/${prefix}.sfv" > > m3u="${directory}/${prefix}.m3u" > > > > cd ${directory} > > > > rm -f *.sfv; rm -f *.m3u > > touch ${sfv}; cfv -Cq *.mp3 > > cat ${current}.sfv | awk '! /^;/' > ${sfv} > > rm -f ${current}.sfv > > > > for mp3 in *.mp3; do echo "${mp3}" >> ${m3u}; done > > > > echo "$current: Done" > > > > done > > > > Thanks guys, > > Kristian > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org"> > > > -- > ~~o0OO0o~~ > Pete Wright > www.nycbug.org > NYC's *BSD User Group > Thanks! Kristian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 15:33:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A881416A433 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:33:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gpeel@thenetnow.com) Received: from constellation.thenetnow.com (thenetnow.com [69.90.69.141]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43CB143D48 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:33:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gpeel@thenetnow.com) Received: from hpeel.ody.ca ([216.240.12.2] helo=GRANT) by constellation.thenetnow.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.54) id 1ExnP7-00065E-GD for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 10:33:21 -0500 Message-ID: <003e01c6191f$d9d2cfb0$6501a8c0@GRANT> From: "Grant Peel" To: Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 10:33:18 -0500 Organization: The Net Now Internet MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Subject: Lost Root Pasword. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Grant Peel List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:33:23 -0000 Hi all, Here is a particularly embarrasing statement and question. S: While working on a FreeBSD 4.4 dev box, changed the root password, but now, cant su. the password I used is > 12 chars long, and was made intentionally cryptic. I know all the chars used in the password (yes I have it written down). Q: Where are all the ssh password 'guessing' utilities I see the hackers using on my system? Located, I could really use one. Failing this, I will need to drive to TO and reboot the system by hand and change the passwd. a waste of $50 in gas. -Grant From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 15:59:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5092216A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:59:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ivan.roth@free.fr) Received: from smtp1-g19.free.fr (smtp1-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.27]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E254343D46 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:59:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ivan.roth@free.fr) Received: from imp3-g19.free.fr (imp3-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.3]) by smtp1-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 577EF6E6D0 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 16:59:52 +0100 (CET) Received: by imp3-g19.free.fr (Postfix, from userid 33) id 7C3365443F; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 16:59:54 +0100 (MET) Received: from 83.214.71.138 ([83.214.71.138]) by imp4.free.fr (Horde) with HTTP for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 16:59:54 +0100 Message-ID: <20060114165954.kofwfk45z4w8o4wg@imp4.free.fr> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 16:59:54 +0100 From: ivan.roth@free.fr To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.2) Subject: trouble installing new printer X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:59:53 -0000 Hi, I just bought a Canon i865 yesterday. This is my first printer install on FreeBSD. I, of course, followed the steps described in the handbook. But when running the really simple 'lptest > /dev/lpt0' command, nothing happened, excepted the flashing light on the printer. The flashing time is depending of the job size, i.e. the light is flashing longer with lptest > /dev/lpt0 than with lptest 20 5 > /dev/lpt0. I decided to go a bit firther and configured /etc/printcap, and activated the lf capability. And running lptest 20 5 | lpr -Pmy-printer gave again the same result. I tried many research on the net but could not find anything useful. I am now installing apsfilter but ask you for some help during the compilation process. Thank you. -- Regards, Ivan. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 16:30:15 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8B9A16A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 16:30:15 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ibb27@yahoo.co.uk) Received: from web25008.mail.ukl.yahoo.com (web25008.mail.ukl.yahoo.com [217.12.10.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 00E6D43D45 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 16:30:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ibb27@yahoo.co.uk) Received: (qmail 13717 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Jan 2006 16:30:14 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.co.uk; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=cJw9yCk17JCpu8ETN1qZIdSGTMDnTM462mMuy46MYuxqXS6g3fWz5CFqxVPtTFo63KdRvv8TYM/AoC6vkreqMKxeH3E5WXhlSokq7FxsfBrp/NIldzuT6B2UJ/0BxoCnjJ0WAZ5p0l/wlpMPneIXWKWtMYQo1Jkwht3Qr+wiFJQ= ; Message-ID: <20060114163014.13715.qmail@web25008.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> Received: from [195.234.238.83] by web25008.mail.ukl.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 16:30:14 GMT Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 16:30:14 +0000 (GMT) From: Ivailo Bonev To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: VT8235 Power Management Controller driver? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 16:30:15 -0000 Is FreeBSD 6-STABLE have "VT8235 Power Management Controller" driver? What to insert in kernel to compile it? Or maybe have another way to switch it on? --------------------------------- Yahoo! Messenger NEW - crystal clear PC to PC calling worldwide with voicemail From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 16:31:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DE8216A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 16:31:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from amr.basyouny@gmail.com) Received: from wproxy.gmail.com (wproxy.gmail.com [64.233.184.203]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E02DF43D48 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 16:31:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from amr.basyouny@gmail.com) Received: by wproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i14so770451wra for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 08:31:00 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=H2rK15ov118YjFbj/tsjAPbh8Cz7gH4Z8eeTzDbvgiKTZVZIuXuE7keDhIdYIe08kyAlvV/Y8fduWae45G+5z9f3mgiM6IlxfcvVNV005L7Hgx8LjHZdWzBtCzsJERCMxhDF8vRQUk3nFCg/jqo0wN+8QOvORZROXo7x7AaJ8l4= Received: by 10.54.149.7 with SMTP id w7mr1064522wrd; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 08:31:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.54.156.10 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 08:31:00 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <669d762f0601140831p81fc209sa2746a0321d7b535@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:31:00 +0200 From: Amr Basyouny To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <669d762f0601120906w28c8585eh430a763f9cc5379@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <669d762f0601120906w28c8585eh430a763f9cc5379@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Important .... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 16:31:02 -0000 Hello Kristian . You can check a simple of our works here . www.kingtutresorthrg.com www.khalikonline.com www.monseflabib.com www.tadawl.name.qa www.bsss-eg.org And also translate the whole web site into arabic language Your site already contain multi-languages the site design contain all the languages ... as i said before. PLUS ( Time Limit Offer ) : Free 24 Hours / Day Arabic Live Support .. for 2 monthes ... And we are responsable for translate any quistion or answer to support in a Ticket or E-mail From / To any user for a year .... 24 hours / day live Arabic Phone Support For live time . All this and upload in *two weeks* from order plus 3 monthes updating or adding data for free . and for the security of your data and web site you can send me the files to work on and send it back for you to upload from your own PC . *( secure your password and data )* Also there is an advertising plan in the bigest arabic web site , radio , t= v ... if you wanna ( OWN COST not coverd by the previos offer ) if you like this work re-contact me to start working on the site . the payment method will be by one of these methods : 1 - Western-union cash transfer . 30 % of the decieded amount in advance an= d 70 % after upload . 2 - Bank transfer to my account No. 50 % of the decieded amount in advance and 50 % after upload . Please send me your site details that will work on and if there is any speacial orders and also the budget that you imagine for the design work to decied the amount of funds . Thank you, Amr Basyouny Egypt +20121747071 amr.basyouny@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 16:32:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B30616A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 16:32:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from hub.org (hub.org [200.46.204.220]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 719B343D72 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 16:31:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: from localhost (unknown [200.46.204.144]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B95A062C9DC for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 12:31:52 -0400 (AST) Received: from hub.org ([200.46.204.220]) by localhost (av.hub.org [200.46.204.144]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 00990-04 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 12:31:52 -0400 (AST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (blk-222-82-85.eastlink.ca [24.222.82.85]) by hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56D6762C9D8 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 12:31:52 -0400 (AST) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D1CE446232; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 12:31:50 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF47F3D552 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 12:31:50 -0400 (AST) Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 12:31:50 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060114123041.C28752@ganymede.hub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at hub.org Subject: automounter & jails ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 16:32:04 -0000 Is there any clean way to have automounter setup to automount /usr/ports into a jail'd environment? thanks ... ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 17:02:42 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D34B16A44C for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:02:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-3-1-cust208.cdif.cable.ntl.com [82.31.78.208]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 379CD43D49 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:02:41 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrir.wireless.private.submonkey.net ([192.168.11.23]) by shrike.submonkey.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ExonT-000LLb-O4; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:02:39 +0000 In-Reply-To: <200601140142.10424.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> References: <200601140142.10424.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-3-37162096" Message-Id: <2B48C19C-6734-4AAD-994A-E53CD6A5DBEC@submonkey.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ceri Davies Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:02:31 +0000 To: RW X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.1 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Getting latest files with cvsweb for a given tag X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:02:43 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-3-37162096 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On 14 Jan 2006, at 01:42, RW wrote: > Is there a cvsweb URL that will give me the latest version of a > given file, > given a specific tag? ie without specifying a explicit revision. > > What I am trying to do is write a script that will download the > latest version > of src/sys/conf/newvers.sh for RELENG_6_0, so it can parse out the > version > information and compare it with the output of uname -r. http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/~checkout~/src/sys/conf/ newvers.sh?rev=RELENG_6_0 It's probably easier to use anonymous CVS, although anoncvs.FreeBSD.org doesn't seem to be carrying our tree at the moment. Ceri --Apple-Mail-3-37162096 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDyS6rme8yCsQvJJ0RAlEWAJwPiBXYMA9rJ1DLiQNPPHvRE+2L5ACfQG63 ODDHPcMvoNcNVweaaAXsByU= =6dRR -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-3-37162096-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 17:06:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09ACB16A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:06:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-3-1-cust208.cdif.cable.ntl.com [82.31.78.208]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 125E043D82 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:06:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrir.wireless.private.submonkey.net ([192.168.11.23]) by shrike.submonkey.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ExorE-000JM7-QN; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:06:32 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20060114132225.5867.qmail@web3305.mail.bbt.yahoo.co.jp> References: <20060114132225.5867.qmail@web3305.mail.bbt.yahoo.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-5-37399550" Message-Id: <9D13FAE5-55B3-4A57-9AF9-C80677AF1698@submonkey.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ceri Davies Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:06:29 +0000 To: n-n X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.1 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: It is old. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:06:51 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-5-37399550 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed On 14 Jan 2006, at 13:22, n-n wrote: > Everyone says that FreeBSD is old. > Hereafter, many people will say that Linux and OpenSolaris are > good. I'm sorry, what are you talking about? Ceri -- That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Alice --Apple-Mail-5-37399550 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDyS+Vme8yCsQvJJ0RAmO6AKCId3hdGGRqxjnqjZHrGqOux2Wi7wCeIDSi a8A43Vy6Ky575iQSGk5H3WU= =xMia -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-5-37399550-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 17:08:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C7D16A420 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:08:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-3-1-cust208.cdif.cable.ntl.com [82.31.78.208]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93DBE43D49 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:08:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrir.wireless.private.submonkey.net ([192.168.11.23]) by shrike.submonkey.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ExotT-0008Hw-Qx; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:08:51 +0000 In-Reply-To: <003301c618f8$c712ec60$0b00020a@mickey> References: <003301c618f8$c712ec60$0b00020a@mickey> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-6-37523400" Message-Id: <2C09AB46-75C4-4917-8977-669D32C24DC9@submonkey.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ceri Davies Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:08:33 +0000 To: Don O'Neil X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.1 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Setquota on FreeBSD 4.11 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:08:54 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-6-37523400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed On 14 Jan 2006, at 10:53, Don O'Neil wrote: > I'm having problems getting the port 'setquota' to work on my FBSD > 4.11 > box... > > When I type: > > setquota -g -f /array01 -bh51200K root > > I get > > setquota : /array01 does not have quotas enabled. > > Or when I type: > > setquota -u -f /array01 -bh51200K root > > I get > > setquota : GETQUOTA(root) - Invalid argument > > Even though I have built the kernel w/ the option, enabled quotas > in rc, > etc... > > quota -v shows: > > Disk quotas for user root (uid 0): > Filesystem usage quota limit grace files quota > limit > grace > /array01 0 0 0 0 > 0 0 > > I can edit quotas using edquota no problems. > > I had to build setquota from sources, as the port package for 4.11 > isn't > available anymore. > > Any ideas what might be going on here? I'm not familiar with the setquota port, but it's possible that the *quota files in /array01 are missing. Running quotacheck will fix that if it's the case. Ceri -- That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Alice --Apple-Mail-6-37523400 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDyTARme8yCsQvJJ0RAuz9AKCIu7jEFPGk8K4pWJYy0qqSAlFU5ACeLf+k BEXKFFNKh/acPFjJ4p9AH+c= =fAlN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-6-37523400-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 17:10:57 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7B7016A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:10:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from shrike.submonkey.net (cpc2-cdif2-3-1-cust208.cdif.cable.ntl.com [82.31.78.208]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4125B43D45 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:10:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ceri@submonkey.net) Received: from fenrir.wireless.private.submonkey.net ([192.168.11.23]) by shrike.submonkey.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:RC4-SHA:128) (Exim 4.60 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ExovT-000O8B-Le; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:10:56 +0000 In-Reply-To: <20060114133326.64176.qmail@web3301.mail.bbt.yahoo.co.jp> References: <20060114133326.64176.qmail@web3301.mail.bbt.yahoo.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Apple-Mail-7-37661671" Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: Ceri Davies Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:10:51 +0000 To: n-n X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.1.1 (Tiger) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OS use rate X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:10:57 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --Apple-Mail-7-37661671 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed On 14 Jan 2006, at 13:33, n-n wrote: > OS use rate in my project. > 2005/01/10 - 2006/01/10 > RedHat Enterprise Linux ES3.0 - 3947 > RedHat Enterprise Linux AS3.0 - 1287 > Sun Solaris 9 - 583 > *BSD - 0 What project is that then? If you can't be bothered to tell us what you are talking about, then don't be surprised if you fall into everyone's killfiles. Whoops, there you go already. Ceri -- That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all. -- Alice --Apple-Mail-7-37661671 content-type: application/pgp-signature; x-mac-type=70674453; name=PGP.sig content-description: This is a digitally signed message part content-disposition: inline; filename=PGP.sig content-transfer-encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDyTCbme8yCsQvJJ0RAgXAAJ9y5cMqyJRDEIeBTCgHKx1h6lhSyACcCFMV YGEQimQv7zb/AIcvihxQipc= =jvUs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail-7-37661671-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 17:29:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F198116A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:29:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: from smtp2.versatel.nl (smtp2.versatel.nl [62.58.50.89]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C28C43D5C for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:29:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from frankstaals@gmx.net) Received: (qmail 5663 invoked by uid 0); 14 Jan 2006 17:29:24 -0000 Received: from ip176-173-59-62.adsl.versatel.nl (HELO [192.168.2.5]) ([62.59.173.176]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp2.versatel.nl (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for < >; 14 Jan 2006 17:29:24 -0000 Message-ID: <43C93519.1040309@gmx.net> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:30:01 +0100 From: Frank Staals User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20060105) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Mail filtering at server X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:29:30 -0000 Hey, I'm running FreeBSD 5-stable and I'm using the system as mailserver, so I set up sendmail using this guide: http://www.puresimplicity.net/~hemi/freebsd/sendmail.html as imap server I'm using imap-uw. Now I would like to do the following: 1) I would like to get all mail from questions@freebsd.org in a seperate directory. Currently I do this by filtering my mail in the mailclient ( Thunderbird ). The directory it uses for this is currently ~/mail/Questions/ so I would like to keep that, how can I do this ? Can I add this to /etc/mail/access ? what would then be the syntax ? 2) I would also like to filter my mail for spam, again: currently I set up thunderbird to do this: the mail marked as spam/junk dissapears into the junk folder: ( ~/mail/junk ) What is the best way to set this up ? can this be done by sendmail itself or should I install an other program from the portstree Thanks in advance, -- -Frank Staals From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 17:31:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7225516A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:31:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A670343D45 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:31:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0EHVbGZ001542; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:31:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k0EHVbd4001539; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:31:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:31:37 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: n-n In-Reply-To: <20060114133326.64176.qmail@web3301.mail.bbt.yahoo.co.jp> Message-ID: <20060114183034.O1344@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <20060114133326.64176.qmail@web3301.mail.bbt.yahoo.co.jp> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OS use rate X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:31:53 -0000 > OS use rate in my project. > 2005/01/10 - 2006/01/10 > RedHat Enterprise Linux ES3.0 - 3947 > RedHat Enterprise Linux AS3.0 - 1287 > Sun Solaris 9 - 583 > *BSD - 0 that's just a problem of these 5817 people/companies/whatever that use them and not FreeBSD. PS. completely off topic, please add more data and send it to advocacy group From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 17:33:00 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A697E16A420 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:33:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (chylonia.3miasto.net [213.192.74.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30B8B43D67 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:32:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from chylonia.3miasto.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0EHWoQr001650; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:32:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by chylonia.3miasto.net (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) with ESMTP id k0EHWkJE001647; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:32:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@tensor.3miasto.net) X-Authentication-Warning: chylonia.3miasto.net: wojtek owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:32:46 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar X-X-Sender: wojtek@chylonia.3miasto.net To: Grant Peel In-Reply-To: <003e01c6191f$d9d2cfb0$6501a8c0@GRANT> Message-ID: <20060114183214.O1344@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <003e01c6191f$d9d2cfb0$6501a8c0@GRANT> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Lost Root Pasword. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:33:00 -0000 > now, cant su. the password I used is > 12 chars long, and was made > intentionally cryptic. I know all the chars used in the password (yes I have > it written down). > > Q: Where are all the ssh password 'guessing' utilities I see the hackers > using on my system? Located, I could really use one. > > Failing this, I will need to drive to TO and reboot the system by hand and > change the passwd. a waste of $50 in gas. > next time use .ssh/authorized_keys or .rhosts or other way to do passwordless logins :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 17:42:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E509C16A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:42:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from post-25.mail.nl.demon.net (post-25.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.195]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01C4243D48 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:42:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from albi@scii.nl) Received: from aseed.demon.nl ([83.160.138.119]:9919 helo=assata.aseed.net) by post-25.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1ExpQW-0001OB-Pc for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:42:56 +0000 Received: from http.aseed.antenna.nl (unknown [192.168.0.50]) by assata.aseed.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 106212A0702 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:45:28 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost.localdomain (217-19-30-147.dsl.cambrium.nl [217.19.30.147]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by http.aseed.antenna.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BD8958C6C7 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:43:04 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:42:50 +0100 From: albi To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20060114184250.9eb70740.albi@scii.nl> In-Reply-To: <20060114123041.C28752@ganymede.hub.org> References: <20060114123041.C28752@ganymede.hub.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed version 2.1.1 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: automounter & jails ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:42:59 -0000 On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 12:31:50 -0400 (AST) "Marc G. Fournier" wrote: > > Is there any clean way to have automounter setup to > automount /usr/ports into a jail'd environment? not an answer to your specific automount-question, but i use a "build-jail" (and use part of the install-result with a read-only null_fs mount in the other jails) and have the /usr/ports/ mounted read-write with null_fs in the jails if needed -- grtjs, albi gpg-key: lynx -dump http://scii.nl/~albi/gpg.asc | gpg --import From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 17:58:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B30016A41F; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:58:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from leon@trusc.net) Received: from cluster1.trusc.net (clgw.trusc.net [196.25.95.198]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F17D243D46; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:58:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from leon@trusc.net) Received: from [192.168.255.25] by cluster1.trusc.net (Exim 4.60 0 (FreeBSD 5.3)) protocol: esmtp id 1Expes-000Pod-Ip ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:57:52 +0200 Message-ID: <43C93B80.7080406@trusc.net> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:57:20 +0200 From: Leon Botes Organization: TruscTechnologies User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Score: -1.4 (-) Cc: Subject: What is wrong with these pf rules? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: leon@trusc.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:58:02 -0000 binat on $dig_if from $dmz_srv to any -> $dig_ip2 binat on $dsl1_if from $dmz_srv to any -> $dsl1_ip2 binat on $dsl2_if from $dmz_srv to any -> $dsl2_ip2 rdr on $dig_if inet proto tcp from any to $dig_ip2 port { 25, 80, 81, 110 } -> $dmz_srv rdr on $dsl1_if inet proto tcp from any to $dsl1_ip2 port { 25, 80, 110 } -> $dmz_srv rdr on $dsl2_if inet proto tcp from any to $dsl2_ip2 port { 25, 80, 110 } -> $dmz_srv $dig_if, $dsl1_if, dsl2_if are all connected to the net via routers. The rule works for whichever interface the default route points to. How can i get pf to return incoming connections out the same interface they arrived on? -- Regards Leon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 18:00:45 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CF6A16A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:00:45 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49FD743D48 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:00:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1ExphO-00049u-O5 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:00:23 +0100 Received: from c-24-147-87-49.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([24.147.87.49]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:00:22 +0100 Received: from jdarnold by c-24-147-87-49.hsd1.ma.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:00:22 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: JD Arnold Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 13:00:22 -0500 Organization: Amazing Developments Lines: 124 Message-ID: References: <666bdb140601081330m3b394a02v@mail.gmail.com> <20060109140254.92455.qmail@web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <43C2C7FE.1010703@chuckr.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-24-147-87-49.hsd1.ma.comcast.net User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (Windows/20051201) In-Reply-To: <43C2C7FE.1010703@chuckr.org> Sender: news Subject: Re: Which is the best open source C/C++ IDE out there? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:00:45 -0000 Chuck Robey wrote: > JD Arnold wrote: > >> Danial Thom wrote: >> >>> >>> --- Vladimir Tsvetkov wrote: >>> >>>>> This is obviously a trick question, because >>>> >>>> real >>>> >>>>> programmers don't use IDEs. Case Closed. >>>> >>>> I'm not a real programmer, but UNIX is a great >>>> developer environment. >>>> It's a tool based environment. >>>> Small tools, strong cohesion in what they are >>>> designed for, easy ways >>>> to combine them to form more complex tasks. >>>> Good documentation too. >>>> Actually you don't need anything else, you >>>> don't need a colourfull IDE. But... >>>> Maybe only few, really exceptional people can >>>> benefit and grok the >>>> power of this kind of environments. >>>> To me the ideal "IDE" is actually a toolkit: >>>> - Source Editor, preferably with a object >>>> browser or other kind of a >>>> source browser. An autocomplete functionallity >>>> could increase >>>> productivity too - this could increase quality >>>> if we measure quality >>>> of code by the low number of syntax mistakes, >>>> but this could also be a >>>> threat to quality letting the programmer write >>>> without reading >>>> carefully what is written - code bloating. >>>> - Compiler with a debugger. We must discuss >>>> about the pros. and cons. >>>> of a grafic debugger versus a text-mode >>>> debugger. The things are >>>> getting really messy when it comes up to >>>> debugging multithreading code >>>> and I really don't know what is the ultimate >>>> tool for this task. >>>> - A build tool. Ant or make will suffice. >>>> - Source control tools. CVS, SVN etc. >>>> - Documentation tools. POD, Doxygen, Javadoc or >>>> something else. >>>> - Unit testing framework. This is not always a >>>> tool. This could be a >>>> language extension, or a testing API. >>>> - Other tools. >>>> >>>> You don't need to put everything together in a >>>> single swissknife-tool, >>>> but this could be convenient in some cases. >>>> >>>> IDE vs. Toolbased Environments ??? >>>> >>>> Which is more productive and how to measure >>>> productiveness? >>>> >>>> Best Regards, >>>> Vladimir Tsvetkov >>> >>> >>> Tools, schmools. vi and cc work for me. >>> >>> I do admit that I wish someone would get make to >>> accept spaces instead of the (damn) tab. I think >>> its time for that :) >> >> >> That's why you should graduate to Emacs - with the makefile syntax >> highlighting, >> you'll at least see the differences between tabs and spaces before >> getting into >> trouble due to bad whitespacing!-) >> > you're certainly giving a viewpoint that has a great deal of truth to > it, but I guess what scares folks is the horrible, horrible emacs > learning curve,. At one point in my career (in school, lisp > programming) I learned/used emacs. I admit, it's got so much power, > there isn't even a close competitor. BUT at that time, I had a genius > girl programmer at my side, and she helped me with emacs syntax so > heavily it was funny, and so I could make use of emacs without really > having to scale the learning curve. > > If I'd actually had to scale that learning curve, do you think I would > have, even COULD have used emacs? One of the worst things I had happen, > I needed, one year later, to go back to vi for a job, and just forgot > enough emacs usages, and never went back. I'd love to, but I'd have to > find another genius Lisp girlfriend, before I could do that. > > Likely? That's why emacs isn't the world's most popular editor/IDE. A couple of notes on this: * The coolest thing about Emacs is you learn it once and you are set for life. No matter what platform, there's bound to be an Emacs port. I've been using Emacs for 15+ years, and I've never had to learn another editor. And that includes working on the Atari ST, OS/2, any Un*x flavor of the month, etc. The native Windows port is one of the best ports, too. * You in no way, shape or manner need to know lisp. These days, with the fancy "customize" stuff, you almost never need to program in elisp. * I'd actually contend that emacs *is* the world's most popular (ie., "used") editor in the world. Given the gazillion platforms it runs on, and it's amazing flexibility, I think you'd be hard pressed to name another one that can contend with it. * I'm not sure why you'd "have to go back to vi for a job". Why would anyone care what editor you use, as long as you get the job done? I've worked in many companies, using many different platforms, and I've always used Emacs. -- Jonathan Arnold (mailto:jdarnold@buddydog.org) Daemon Dancing in the Dark, a FreeBSD weblog: http://freebsd.amazingdev.com/blog/ UNIX is user-friendly. It's just a bit picky about who its friends are. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 18:12:11 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCBFF16A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:12:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from petr@cdr.cz) Received: from smtp-out.klfree.net (ip1.goldheart.klfree.net [62.240.168.31]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7678843D45 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:12:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from petr@cdr.cz) Received: from localhost (loopback [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.klfree.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45CEDD3598 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:12:10 +0100 (CET) Received: from K2P (ip18.k2.klfree.czf [10.102.41.75]) by smtp.klfree.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58DBCD3102 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:12:07 +0100 (CET) From: "Petr Murmak" To: Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:10:42 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 Thread-Index: AcYZNdTBP6WQd4Q0R0+9mfegOwz7jg== Message-Id: <20060114181207.58DBCD3102@smtp.klfree.net> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at mail.klfree.net Subject: Multiple IP in jail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:12:12 -0000 Hi! Is it possible to assign multiple IP to one jail on FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE? I want to use in jail apache for which i really need more than one IP. I found some patches for 5.0 but they are more than 2 years old without maintaining, so I didn't tried them. Petr From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 18:14:34 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D2816A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:14:34 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tofik@oxygen.az) Received: from mail.alkar.net (mail.alkar.net [195.248.191.95]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CC8E43D45 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:14:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from tofik@oxygen.az) Received: from [213.227.193.75] (HELO [192.168.0.178]) by mail.alkar.net (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.3.9) with ESMTP id 425219392 for questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 20:14:29 +0200 Message-ID: <43C95BCE.8010906@oxygen.az> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 20:15:10 +0000 From: Tofik Suleymanov User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050404) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: adding new sysctl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:14:34 -0000 Any advice on adding new sysctl to the system ? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 18:26:19 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA3F16A420 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:26:19 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com) Received: from web32911.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web32911.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.58]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0204F43D5A for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:26:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com) Received: (qmail 85886 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Jan 2006 18:26:15 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=tmQw0jxOFJjtAW76mvEbYgigPkgX3oXSj2xcDmddAjMX1uNWmrnae3MlL7SYrhr5jJTp14bhAFP/mEbNs6PSseM4wIYpMkBqOfdGvRZu1ef1vP9X3gqX5gXbNJYvm60dVrWmqC3Iqv3oykc/myuY+OwR/cnwaZLcyeOUzSE37C0= ; Message-ID: <20060114182614.85884.qmail@web32911.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Received: from [69.79.128.115] by web32911.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:26:14 CET Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:26:14 +0100 (CET) From: To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Cc: Subject: /etc/rc.firewall and dhclient(8) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pfgshield-freebsd@yahoo.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:26:19 -0000 Hi; I activated my firewall "client" configuration on my desktop that uses dhcp for a cable modem. Everything works fine (I even enabled ping), however, everytime I shutdown and restart the modem I find myself having to check /var/db/dhclient.leases.xl0 to edit /etc/rc.firewall to change $net and $ip. Is there an easy way to automate this? cheers, Pedro. ___________________________________ Yahoo! Mail: gratis 1GB per i messaggi e allegati da 10MB http://mail.yahoo.it From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 18:55:03 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB4D116A424 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:55:03 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imran@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk) Received: from darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk (darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk [202.59.74.139]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 320F643DA9 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:54:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from imran@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk) Received: from darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k0EB3Gdb073765 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 16:03:16 +0500 (PKT) (envelope-from imran@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk) Received: (from root@localhost) by darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id k0EB3FEb073764 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 16:03:15 +0500 (PKT) (envelope-from imran) Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 16:03:15 +0500 (PKT) From: Imran Imtiaz Message-Id: <200601141103.k0EB3FEb073764@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: field description X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:55:03 -0000 when i do w wicontrol ath0 -L it shows me the aps that are currently running i am pasting the output SSID BSSID Chan SN S N Intrvl Capinfo [ 00:11:92:3e:35:80 ] [ 1 ] [ 0 0 0 ] 100 [ ess priv shpr shst ] [ 1 2 5.5 6 9 11 12 18 24 36 ] LakeCity [ 00:a0:c5:9e:b4:85 ] [ 2 ] [ 0 0 0 ] 100 [ ess priv ] [ 1 2 5.5 11 ] MisDept [ 00:06:25:df:83:3d ] [ 6 ] [ 0 0 0 ] 100 [ ess ] [ 1 2 5.5 11 ] Yousuf [ 00:14:bf:04:d1:f9 ] [ 6 ] [ 0 0 0 ] 100 [ ess ] [ 1 2 5.5 6 9 11 12 18 24 36 ] c can anyone tell me what does Capinfo field means e.g; ess = ?? priv = ?? shpr = ?? shst = ?? regards, Imran Imtiaz From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 19:02:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35DCC16A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:02:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org) Received: from orchid.homeunix.org (auu196.neoplus.adsl.tpnet.pl [83.27.28.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B69243D45 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:02:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org) Received: from [192.168.1.66] (blackacidevil.orchid.homeunix.org [192.168.1.66]) (authenticated bits=0) by orchid.homeunix.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0EJ29Ca084308 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 14 Jan 2006 20:02:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org) Message-ID: <43C94AAA.9070009@orchid.homeunix.org> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 20:02:02 +0100 From: Karol Kwiatkowski User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5 (X11/20060112) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: vocativus References: <1965019375.20060111213647@interia.pl> In-Reply-To: <1965019375.20060111213647@interia.pl> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.93.0.0 OpenPGP: id=06E09309; url=http://www.orchid.homeunix.org/carlos/gpg/0x06E09309.asc Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig6BC0AC5C33F69AA1EAA58793" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.88/1241/Sat Jan 14 11:00:03 2006 on orchid.homeunix.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Pooomooocyyyy ;( X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@orchid.homeunix.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:02:33 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig6BC0AC5C33F69AA1EAA58793 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable vocativus wrote: > Witam! >=20 [...] > Moja obecna konfiguracja: >=20 > P=B3. g=B3=F3wna: 939NF4G - SATA2 > Procesor: AMD Athlon 64 3200+ venice socket 939 > Karta graficzna - zintegrowana z p=B3yt=B1 g=B3=F3wn=B1 - GeForce 6100 = - pami=EA=E6 > 128MB > Karta sieciowa - zintegrowana z p=B3yt=B1 g=B3=F3wn=B1 - Realtek PHY R= TL8201CL > Karta d=BCwi=EAkowa - Realtek ALC850 7.1channel AC'97 audio codec > RAM - 768MB (128 zarezerwowane dla karty graficznej wi=EAc dost=EApne j= est > 640MB RAM) > Wersja BIOS-u - P1.30 >=20 >=20 > I wzi=B1=B3em wyczyszczony dysk (bez jakichkolwiek partycji) pod=B3=B1c= zony > jako jedyny dysk, po wybraniu opcji default boot, wybraniu opcji > standard, naci=B6ni=EAciu ok w oknie gdzie pisze co=B6 o fdisk-u, wybra= niu > dysku - w moim przypadku ad0 wy=B6wietla sie komunikat: >=20 >=20 >=20 > Warning: A geometry of 77545/16/63 for ad0 is incorrect. Using a more > likely geometry. If this geometry is incorrect or you are unsure as to > whether or not it's correct, please consult the Hardware Guide in the > Documentation submenu or use the (G)eometry command to change it now >=20 > Remember: you need to enter whatever your BIOS thinks the geometry is! > For IDE it's what yoy were told in the BIOS setup. For SCSI, it's the > translation mode your controller is using. Do NOT use a "physical geome= try" >=20 >=20 >=20 > I nic da=B3em na ok, rozplanowa=B3em partycje da=B3em na instaluj i poj= awi=B3 > mi si=EA komunikat o b=B3=EAdzie, =BFe nie mo=BFna zapisa=E6 danych na = dysk i na > tym koniec. Cze=B6=E6 vocativus, Nie wiem w czym tkwi problem, ale spr=F3buj zapyta=E6 na polskim forum system=F3w BSD: http://www.bsdguru.org/dyskusja/ Je=B6li chcia=B3by=B6 uzyska=E6 pomoc na freebsd-questions (lub innych li= stach na freebsd.org) najlepiej pisa=E6 w j=EAzyku angielskim. Pozdrawiam, Karol P.S. FreeBSD to nie jest Linux :) --=20 Karol Kwiatkowski GPGKey: http://www.orchid.homeunix.org/carlos/gpg/0x06E09309.asc --------------enig6BC0AC5C33F69AA1EAA58793 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDyUqzezeoPAwGIYsRAg2hAKCy9eGbhEJuCG0+SvrgtXkICn0o7gCgptu+ pzs0evRzAc/hcwWqF5VLHH4= =JfeL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig6BC0AC5C33F69AA1EAA58793-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 19:15:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A10D016A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:15:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from rosebud.otenet.gr (rosebud.otenet.gr [195.170.0.94]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56EA643D55 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:15:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (patr530-a088.otenet.gr [212.205.215.88]) by rosebud.otenet.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-8) with ESMTP id k0EJDtuX018402; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:14:31 +0200 Received: by flame.pc (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D48F311630; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:12:01 +0200 (EET) Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:12:01 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: JD Arnold Message-ID: <20060114191201.GA20239@flame.pc> References: <666bdb140601081330m3b394a02v@mail.gmail.com> <20060109140254.92455.qmail@web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <43C2C7FE.1010703@chuckr.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Which is the best open source C/C++ IDE out there? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:15:24 -0000 On 2006-01-14 13:00, JD Arnold wrote: > Chuck Robey wrote: > > At one point in my career (in school, lisp programming) I > > learned/used emacs. I admit, it's got so much power, there > > isn't even a close competitor. BUT at that time, I had a > > genius girl programmer at my side, and she helped me with > > emacs syntax so heavily it was funny, and so I could make use > > of emacs without really having to scale the learning curve. > > > > If I'd actually had to scale that learning curve, do you > > think I would have, even COULD have used emacs? One of the > > worst things I had happen, I needed, one year later, to go > > back to vi for a job, and just forgot enough emacs usages, > > and never went back. I'd love to, but I'd have to find > > another genius Lisp girlfriend, before I could do that. > > > > Likely? That's why emacs isn't the world's most popular > > editor/IDE. > > A couple of notes on this: [...] > > * I'm not sure why you'd "have to go back to vi for a job". Why > would anyone care what editor you use, as long as you get the > job done? I've worked in many companies, using many different > platforms, and I've always used Emacs. I'm sure Chuck, who is a very regular contributor to the lists, posting useful, knowledgeable replies, is not trying to troll against Emacs, but stating something that has been his personal experience :) I can definitely understand that, under certain circumstances, one may have to switch tools for political rather than really technical reasons. I have worked at places where we were not allowed to install 'extra' programs in the development machines, to avoid creating dependencies that the official build machines would not be able to satisfy. This had the silly side-effect that it was not possible to install a snapshot of Emacs on the development machines, so all we had was /usr/bin/vi. Having said that, I can usually install Emacs, either as a supported system package, or by bootstrapping it from source with --prefix="$HOME/opt", so I'm also using Emacs as my "IDE" for around 12 years now. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 19:23:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30EA716A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:23:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: from luke.segpub.com.au (luke.segpub.com.au [64.49.254.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9B7743D45 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:23:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: (qmail 27277 invoked by uid 89); 15 Jan 2006 06:23:16 +1100 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 27253, pid: 27255, t: 1.6415s scanners: clamav: 0.87/m:34/d:1169 spam: 3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on luke.segpub.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.35?) (213.202.144.215) by 0 with SMTP; 15 Jan 2006 06:23:14 +1100 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed To: freebsd From: eoghan Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:23:12 +0000 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Subject: kde 3.5 in ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:23:17 -0000 Hello So it looks like kde 3.5 has been committed to ports. http://freebsd.kde.org/index.php#n20060108 I just cvsup'd and: # pkg_info -la | grep kde still showing me 3.4.3... Im using cvsup.ie.FreeBSD.org so perhaps some mirrors have not yet been updated? Apart from this, I believe there was some issues with 3.5... anyone got it up and going? Thanks Eoghan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 19:32:14 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75F0A16A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:32:14 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from rosebud.otenet.gr (rosebud.otenet.gr [195.170.0.94]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B09C43D5C for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:32:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from flame.pc (patr530-a088.otenet.gr [212.205.215.88]) by rosebud.otenet.gr (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-8) with ESMTP id k0EJW9NM026123; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:32:10 +0200 Received: by flame.pc (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C506811609; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:31:22 +0200 (EET) Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:31:22 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: n-n Message-ID: <20060114173122.GA28655@flame.pc> References: <20060114132225.5867.qmail@web3305.mail.bbt.yahoo.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060114132225.5867.qmail@web3305.mail.bbt.yahoo.co.jp> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: It is old. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:32:14 -0000 On 2006-01-14 22:22, n-n wrote: > Everyone says that FreeBSD is old. Hereafter, many people will say > that Linux and OpenSolaris are good. Nice troll :P From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 19:36:23 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE21E16A44E for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:36:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: from luke.segpub.com.au (luke.segpub.com.au [64.49.254.38]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 359BE43D45 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:36:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@redry.net) Received: (qmail 35722 invoked by uid 89); 15 Jan 2006 06:36:22 +1100 Received: by simscan 1.1.0 ppid: 35689, pid: 35698, t: 2.0363s scanners: clamav: 0.87/m:34/d:1169 spam: 3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on luke.segpub.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.1.35?) (213.202.144.215) by 0 with SMTP; 15 Jan 2006 06:36:20 +1100 In-Reply-To: <20060114173122.GA28655@flame.pc> References: <20060114132225.5867.qmail@web3305.mail.bbt.yahoo.co.jp> <20060114173122.GA28655@flame.pc> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v746.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <817E0CB4-22E3-45F3-ADF9-EC061603E637@redry.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: eoghan Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:36:17 +0000 To: Giorgos Keramidas X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.746.2) Cc: n-n , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: It is old. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:36:24 -0000 On 14 Jan 2006, at 17:31, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2006-01-14 22:22, n-n wrote: >> Everyone says that FreeBSD is old. Hereafter, many people will say >> that Linux and OpenSolaris are good. > > Nice troll :P sounds like ageism to me :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 19:49:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC8F016A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:49:54 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: from smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (smtprelay01.ispgateway.de [80.67.18.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1F4443D45 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:49:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-listen@fabiankeil.de) Received: (qmail 12013 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2006 19:49:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) ([pbs]775067@[217.187.172.160]) (envelope-sender ) by smtprelay01.ispgateway.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 14 Jan 2006 19:49:52 -0000 Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 20:49:38 +0100 From: Fabian Keil To: Imran Imtiaz Message-ID: <20060114204938.4aeed9d2@localhost> In-Reply-To: <200601141103.k0EB3FEb073764@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk> References: <200601141103.k0EB3FEb073764@darkstar.thelakecity.com.pk> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 1.9.100 (GTK+ 2.8.6; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) X-PGP-KEY-URL: http://www.fabiankeil.de/gpg-keys/freebsd-listen-2006-08-19.asc Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_75K.GM.sG7GKrT=apGYXyip"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wicontrol -L output (was: field description) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:49:54 -0000 --Sig_75K.GM.sG7GKrT=apGYXyip Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Imran Imtiaz wrote: > when i do w > wicontrol ath0 -L > it shows me the aps that are currently running i am pasting the output [...] > can anyone tell me what does Capinfo field means e.g; ess =3D ?? priv > =3D ?? shpr =3D ?? shst =3D ?? My guess is "Extended Service Set", "Privacy", "Short Preamble" and "Short slot time". On FreeBSD 6.0 and later these options are described in man ifconfig in the scan section. Fabian --=20 http://www.fabiankeil.de/ --Sig_75K.GM.sG7GKrT=apGYXyip Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDyVXfjV8GA4rMKUQRAie3AKDDHMe+yH89qXaavElXOfdMrLiRmwCgyz9w id5qjKJioTfsFOp2JVmy0xQ= =bvra -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_75K.GM.sG7GKrT=apGYXyip-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 20:26:26 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E0D716A420 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 20:26:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EA0243D49 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 20:26:25 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C2D1A3C26 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 12:26:25 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AAC5152529; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:26:24 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:26:24 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway Message-ID: <20060114202624.GA52343@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060114133326.64176.qmail@web3301.mail.bbt.yahoo.co.jp> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5vNYLRcllDrimb99" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060114133326.64176.qmail@web3301.mail.bbt.yahoo.co.jp> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OS use rate X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 20:26:26 -0000 --5vNYLRcllDrimb99 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 10:33:26PM +0900, n-n wrote: > OS use rate in my project.=20 > 2005/01/10 - 2006/01/10 > RedHat Enterprise Linux ES3.0 - 3947 > RedHat Enterprise Linux AS3.0 - 1287 > Sun Solaris 9 - 583 > *BSD - 0 WORST TROLL EVAR Kris --5vNYLRcllDrimb99 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDyV5wWry0BWjoQKURAkjSAKCz+CEqVQduc/7Cn6as5COgnqwUYwCgoVPM 8xEhNXXs27FwE82Wz9ZIxvE= =BFQr -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5vNYLRcllDrimb99-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 20:27:22 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6C6216A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 20:27:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB45A43D64 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 20:27:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 953181A3C26; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 12:27:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EBB6D54A21; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:27:19 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:27:19 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: eoghan Message-ID: <20060114202719.GB52343@xor.obsecurity.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="OwLcNYc0lM97+oe1" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd Subject: Re: kde 3.5 in ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 20:27:22 -0000 --OwLcNYc0lM97+oe1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 07:23:12PM +0000, eoghan wrote: > Hello > So it looks like kde 3.5 has been committed to ports. > http://freebsd.kde.org/index.php#n20060108 > I just cvsup'd and: > # pkg_info -la | grep kde > still showing me 3.4.3... > Im using cvsup.ie.FreeBSD.org so perhaps some mirrors have not yet =20 > been updated? Looks like you forgot to actually upgrade your installed ports, you only updated the ports tree. > Apart from this, I believe there was some issues with 3.5... anyone =20 > got it up and going? Works for me. Kris --OwLcNYc0lM97+oe1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDyV6nWry0BWjoQKURApzzAJ9ojIi1LKapOdxlTnZKj/LasgktHQCeOBO7 hxNHKQEePdeRfae7OIiCUcs= =gtMf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --OwLcNYc0lM97+oe1-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 21:18:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C5B216A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:18:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gollum123@free.fr) Received: from smtp5-g19.free.fr (smtp5-g19.free.fr [212.27.42.35]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED77943D46 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:18:50 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gollum123@free.fr) Received: from [192.168.0.140] (tui75-2-82-229-178-102.fbx.proxad.net [82.229.178.102]) by smtp5-g19.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46E6817126; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:18:50 +0100 (CET) Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:18:49 +0100 From: Mathieu CHATEAU X-Mailer: The Bat! (v3.62.12) Professional X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <1803146722.20060114221849@free.fr> To: Dominique Goncalves In-Reply-To: <7daacbbe0601140303p207b7a64x6d3e39042db34272@mail.gmail.com> References: <822293652.20060114105311@free.fr> <7daacbbe0601140303p207b7a64x6d3e39042db34272@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: [RESOLVED] Re[2]: portupgrade from bin 9.3.1 to 9.3.2 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Mathieu CHATEAU List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:18:51 -0000 Saturday, January 14, 2006, 12:03:47 PM, you wrote: DG> Hi, DG> On 1/14/06, Mathieu CHATEAU wrote: >> Hello, >> >> i have done a portupgrade -Rr bind9 on a server. >> >> bind 9.3.1 was in /usr/sbin/named, but >> bind 9.3.2 is in /usr/local/sbin/named >> >> Now, i have 2 bind9 version on the same system... >> >> any way to cleanup ? did i miss something ? DG> pkg_delete the bind 9.3.2 port installation, and install bind 9.3.2 DG> with this option WITH_PORT_REPLACES_BASE_BIND9=YES in your make.conf DG> HTH. >> >> Thanks, >> Mathieu CHATEAU DG> Regards. it works, thanks ! /etc/rc.d/named still gives some errors : /etc/rc.d/named: WARNING: $command_interpreter -c != ELF [: /usr/sbin/named: unexpected operator Starting named. named is started anyway. I have read somewhere that named shoud now be controlled by rndc directly : why not change named.conf to use rndc to still have a startup script ? Mathieu CHATEAU From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 21:26:07 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A45116A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:26:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list@mindling.com) Received: from a.mail.sonic.net (a.mail.sonic.net [64.142.16.245]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA0E443D46 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:26:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list@mindling.com) Received: from [10.0.0.11] (64-142-39-120.dsl.static.sonic.net [64.142.39.120]) (authenticated bits=0) by a.mail.sonic.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k0ELQ6uh017323 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 13:26:06 -0800 Message-ID: <43C96C73.9010904@mindling.com> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 13:26:11 -0800 From: Sebastian User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.5 (Windows/20050711) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Getting around WRITE_DMA errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:26:07 -0000 Hi, Installing 6.0-RELEASE on a new machine. (Have tried 5.4 too). Using a PCChips M848ALU motherboard with onboard SiS IDE controller, and a Hitachi 160gb disk. When my disk is in UDMA6 (133) mode, FreeBSD dies painfully with many errors like: ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA48 UDMA ICRC error (retrying request) LBA=316139999 ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA48 UDMA ICRC error (retrying request) LBA=316139999 ad0: FAILURE - WRITE_DMA48 status=51(READY,DSC,ERROR) error=4(ABORTED) LBA=316139999 It then panics and dumps: panic: initiate_write_inodeblock_ufs2: already started If I disable dma using "set hw.ata.ata_dma=0" at boot, or simply boot in safe mode, it goes into PI04 mode and works fine. Also, if I change to a lesser UDMA value using atacontrol after boot, such as: # atacontrol mode ad0 UDMA4 ... it also seems to behave just fine. I've tried UDMA3, UDMA4, UDMA5, all seemingly without errors. But when I use UDMA6, the machine immediately dies when the disk gets written to. So my question: What's the best way to tell FreeBSD to always use UDMA5 mode on that disk at boot time (before it attempts to use the drive)? Thanks, Sebastian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 21:55:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD32216A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:55:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rubenl@bloemgarten.demon.nl) Received: from post-23.mail.nl.demon.net (post-23.mail.nl.demon.net [194.159.73.193]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5922143D45 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:55:24 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from rubenl@bloemgarten.demon.nl) Received: from axelds.demon.nl ([83.160.138.74]:43943 helo=abubbletprpdda) by post-23.mail.nl.demon.net with esmtp (Exim 4.51) id 1ExtMp-000LUG-1a; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:55:23 +0000 From: "Ruben Bloemgarten" To: "'Petr Murmak'" , Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:55:08 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.6353 In-Reply-To: <20060114181207.58DBCD3102@smtp.klfree.net> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1506 Thread-Index: AcYZNdTBP6WQd4Q0R0+9mfegOwz7jgAHthZw Message-Id: <20060114215524.5922143D45@mx1.FreeBSD.org> Cc: Subject: RE: Multiple IP in jail? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: ruben@bloemgarten.demon.nl List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:55:24 -0000 If you use nat in conjuction with jails there is no need to add multiple ip's to the jails to be able to reach apache on multiple ip's, although I agree that it would be nice to be able to assign multiple ip's to a jail. Anyone ? Regards, Ruben -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Petr Murmak Sent: January 14, 2006 7:11 PM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Multiple IP in jail? Hi! Is it possible to assign multiple IP to one jail on FreeBSD 6.0-STABLE? I want to use in jail apache for which i really need more than one IP. I found some patches for 5.0 but they are more than 2 years old without maintaining, so I didn't tried them. Petr _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/229 - Release Date: 01/13/2006 -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Free Edition. Version: 7.1.371 / Virus Database: 267.14.17/229 - Release Date: 01/13/2006 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 21:56:17 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF82816A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:56:16 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from SP373@student.apu.ac.uk) Received: from mailhub-out.apu.ac.uk (mailhub-out.apu.ac.uk [193.63.55.103]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCC4943D5D for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:56:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from SP373@student.apu.ac.uk) Received: from smtp.cam.apu.ac.uk ([193.63.55.9]:33416) by mailhub.anglia.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ExtMy-0007Gv-SQ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:55:32 +0000 Received: from cam-netmail.netware.anglia.ac.uk ([194.83.45.141]:39849 helo=student.apu.ac.uk) by boswell.cam.apu.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1ExtJq-00007H-F1 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:52:18 +0000 Received: from SP373 [172.212.93.178] by student.apu.ac.uk with NetMail ModWeb Module; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:52:13 +0000 From: "SPYRIDON PAPADOPOULOS" To: home_post01@yahoo.co.jp Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:52:13 +0000 X-Mailer: NetMail ModWeb Module X-Sender: SP373 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <1137275533.8ba70ca0SP373@student.apu.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-ARU-HELO: smtp.cam.apu.ac.uk X-ARU-sender-host: smtp.cam.apu.ac.uk [193.63.55.9]:33416 X-ARU-MailScanner-Info: see http://www.apu.ac.uk/mail-problems X-ARU-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ARU-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5.462, required 6, autolearn=not spam, ARU_FROM_AC_UK -4.00, ARU_TO_JP 1.50, AWL -0.50, BAYES_00 -2.60, FORGED_RCVD_HELO 0.14) X-ARU-MailScanner-From: sp373@student.apu.ac.uk X-APU-MailFilter: message scanned X-ARU-MailFilter: message scanned Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: OS use rate X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: SP373@student.apu.ac.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:56:17 -0000 home_post01@yahoo.co.jp wrote: >-----Original Message----- >From: n-n >To: questions@freebsd.org >Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:33:26 +0900 (JST) >Subject: OS use rate >OS use rate in my project.=20 >2005/01/10 - 2006/01/10 >RedHat Enterprise Linux ES3.0 - 3947 >RedHat Enterprise Linux AS3.0 - 1287 >Sun Solaris 9 - 583 >*BSD - 0 Are these from a magazine? Did you want to tease the list? How would you ex= pect to get responses that may help you in your project with such posts? = ...just curious. Well your post doesn't really make sense, but i will tell you what i think. Lets make something clear: 1. http://www.redhat.com/en_us/USA/rhel/compare/server/ Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES=3D=3D> Basic Edition: $349 =3D=3D> Standard Edition: $799 2. http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/index.jsp Check it...even if it is for free, i didn't search to much, they sell it wi= th their servers, etc etc. In which case you need their support as well, = etc etc. Keywords: License, budget, money, financial. Obviously the comparison above is wrong since is comparing dissimilar thing= s. Magazines, papers and websites are not trustful when money is behind it. Yo= u are talking about a project so think more about your sources. What was = their intentions? By the way i found another comparison here: http://www.sun.com/software/solaris/index.jsp As you can see there are no BSDs in this list? I suppose because there is a= difference between them and BSDs. Can you see the difference? (If i am wrong please someone correct me!) I have more objectives... * If Solaris is more popular (well it is maybe, because of marketing issues= , but not because of its sources) why there is only a www.google.com/bsd(= !) and not ~/solaris or ~/redhat. :o). I am sure you know that google is = very popular, isn't it? * I can find BSD referenced under the most important things i worked, in co= mputing until today. Conclusion: The above list/comparison, do not mean anything to me. think more next time= and make your thoughts clear so you can get better answers, than the one= s you got! People reading posts in this list can configure BSDs to work like Solaris, = AIX, Red Hat Enterprise Solutions, exaclty as the people that work for SU= N or IBM. If you don't then your only choice is a "company" that will do = everything for you! For a price! This list seems to be for learning and not for announcements like the one y= ou posted. The fact BSD are older, also implies who copied what in the past and from w= hom. I logically suppose! Spiros =20 -------------------------------------- Yahoo! Mail - supported by 10million people http://pr.mail.yahoo.co.jp/mail_pr/ _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " make your thoughts clear so you can get better answers, than the ones you g= ot! People reading posts in this list can configure BSDs to work like Solaris, = AIX, Red Hat Enterprise Solutions, exaclty as the people that work for SU= N or IBM. If you don't then your only choice is a "company" that will do = everything for you! For a price! This list seems to be for learning and not for announcements like the one y= ou posted. The fact BSD are older, also implies who copied what in the past and from w= hom. I logically suppose! Spiros -------------------------------------- Yahoo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 22:08:40 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3157816A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:08:40 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from ciao.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.229.2]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE8CA43D45 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:08:39 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1ExtZW-0008M7-V6 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 23:08:30 +0100 Received: from port-212-202-34-162.dynamic.qsc.de ([212.202.34.162]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 23:08:30 +0100 Received: from markus by port-212-202-34-162.dynamic.qsc.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 23:08:30 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Markus Trippelsdorf Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:08:21 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 27 Message-ID: <0T2rehckIn3Nv9%markus@bsd.trippelsdorf.de> References: <43C96C73.9010904@mindling.com> X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: port-212-202-34-162.dynamic.qsc.de Sender: news Subject: Re: Getting around WRITE_DMA errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:08:40 -0000 On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 13:26:11 -0800, Sebastian wrote: > Hi, > Installing 6.0-RELEASE on a new machine. (Have tried 5.4 too). Using a > PCChips M848ALU motherboard with onboard SiS > IDE controller, and a Hitachi 160gb disk. > > When my disk is in UDMA6 (133) mode, FreeBSD dies painfully with many > errors like: > > ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA48 UDMA ICRC error (retrying request) > LBA=316139999 > ad0: WARNING - WRITE_DMA48 UDMA ICRC error (retrying request) > LBA=316139999 > ad0: FAILURE - WRITE_DMA48 status=51(READY,DSC,ERROR) > error=4(ABORTED) LBA=316139999 > > It then panics and dumps: > > panic: initiate_write_inodeblock_ufs2: already started > Are you sure that your hard drive is not dying? Run smartctl -a /dev/ad0 and see if any errors were being logged. (smartctl is part of the smartmontools port) You should also try another cable. -- Markus From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 22:13:08 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 390CC16A420 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:13:08 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (xproxy.gmail.com [66.249.82.201]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C17843D46 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:13:07 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t12so682185wxc for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:13:06 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:references; b=iDzgAbDTYtvEMK5kY44otkoNabxd55SovnxdYz4VW1L/GC+bMxe41FV3V5fWYXvYyJyy//J3qS6Euyh9tgdz4qW7EXYuwr9klLqjaD4Nz/KeBbd/4ETMgOxz8Syc1+7DAOwb9YH5Lrlqa6bKiRYWkY4xvsDBjDdpE7QY/KY9or0= Received: by 10.70.36.14 with SMTP id j14mr5792522wxj; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:13:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.57.17 with HTTP; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:13:06 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 16:13:06 -0600 From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Przemys=B3aw_Szczygielski?= In-Reply-To: <896595122.20060114115546@go2.pl> MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1467968393.20060114090658@go2.pl> <43C8C3A4.8040601@gmx.net> <896595122.20060114115546@go2.pl> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ndis.ko and if_ndis.ko not compiled during buildkernel X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:13:08 -0000 T24gMS8xNC8wNiwgUHJ6ZW15c7NhdyBTemN6eWdpZWxza2kgPHF1czJAZ28yLnBsPiB3cm90ZToK Pgo+Cj4gPiBXZWxsIC0gdGhleSBkb24ndCBnZXQgYnVpbHQgKGF0IGxlYXN0IGZvciBtZSkuIElz IGFueW9uZSBhYmxlIHRvIHRlbGwgbWUKPiBob3cgdG8KPiA+IGdldCB0aGVzZT8gKG5vdGU6IG5k aXNnZW4gZ2VuZXJhdGVzIG9ubHkgY2FyZCBkcml2ZXIsIE5PVCBuZGlzLmtvIGFuZAo+ID4gaWZf bmRpcy5rbyEsIGFsc28gdGhlIG9sZCB3YXkgd29uJ3Qgd29yayEpCj4KPgo+ID4KPiA+ICBZb3Ug Y2FuIG1vc3QgcHJvYmFibHkganVzdCBjb3B5IHRoZSBmaWxlcyBiYWNrIGZyb20KPiA+IC9ib290 L2tlcm5lbC5vbGQvICAoIG9yIHJ1biBsb2NhdGUgbmRpcy5rbyB0byBzZWUgd2hlcmUgdGhleSBj YW4gYmUgZmluZAo+ICkgdGhhdCBzaG91bGQgd29yawo+ID4KPgo+IE5vcGUsIG9sZCBtb2R1bGVz IGp1c3Qga2lsbCBteSBrZXJuZWwhIFRoYXQncyB0aGUgcHJvYmxlbSEgSSBhbHJlYWR5Cj4gdHJp ZWQgdGhhdCEKPgo+Cm1vby5tb28jIGNkIC9zeXMvbW9kdWxlcy9uZGlzLwptb28ubW9vIyBtYWtl IG9iaiAmJiBtYWtlIGRlcGVuZCAmJiBtYWtlIGFsbCAmJiBtYWtlIGluc3RhbGwKcGVyaGFwcz8K From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 22:18:49 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBE1E16A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:18:49 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from smtp4.suscom.net (smtp4.suscom.net [64.78.119.247]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AABF43D70 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:18:37 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.suscom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90EF415005C for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:18:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp4.suscom.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.suscom.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 25960-01-77 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:18:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from seibercom.net (ip148.217.susc.suscom.net [216.45.217.148]) by smtp4.suscom.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 592CD150059 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:18:27 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (budman [192.168.0.2]) by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0EMISlC001579 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:18:28 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:18:31 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: gerard@seibercom.net Organization: Seibercom.net In-Reply-To: <20060114202719.GB52343@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060114202719.GB52343@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20060114171607.9951.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.24.01 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88, clamav-milter version 0.87 on seibercom.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at suscom.net Subject: Re: kde 3.5 in ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:18:49 -0000 Kris Kennaway > On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 07:23:12PM +0000, eoghan wrote: > > Hello > > So it looks like kde 3.5 has been committed to ports. > > http://freebsd.kde.org/index.php#n20060108 > > I just cvsup'd and: > > # pkg_info -la | grep kde > > still showing me 3.4.3... > > Im using cvsup.ie.FreeBSD.org so perhaps some mirrors have not yet > > been updated? > > Looks like you forgot to actually upgrade your installed ports, you > only updated the ports tree. > > > Apart from this, I believe there was some issues with 3.5... anyone > > got it up and going? > > Works for me. > > Kris Yes, but it has already been updated to 5.5.0_1. That was sure quick. I only got 3.5.0 installed before they bumped it up. -- Gerard Seibert gerard@seibercom.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 22:20:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5303B16A425 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:20:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robertmunn2@comcast.net) Received: from listserv.umd.edu (listserv.umd.edu [128.8.10.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE6A643D46 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:20:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robertmunn2@comcast.net) Received: (from sendmail@localhost) by listserv.umd.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) id k0EMKlJw021895 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:20:47 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:20:47 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200601142220.k0EMKlJw021895@listserv.umd.edu> X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.umd.edu: sendmail set sender to robertmunn2@comcast.net using -f To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: robertmunn2@comcast.net Errors-to: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re: kde 3.5 in ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: robertmunn2@comcast.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:20:47 -0000 Your message has been automatically forwarded to my new address: robertmunn2@comcast.net Please update your addressbooks and lists to reflect this new address. Old Address: munn@umd5.umd.edu New Address: robertmunn2@comcast.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 22:22:51 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC54D16A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:22:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B58343D45 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:22:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 669161A3C24 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:22:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B8E1052744; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:22:50 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:22:50 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20060114222250.GA54853@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060114202719.GB52343@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060114171607.9951.GERARD@seibercom.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060114171607.9951.GERARD@seibercom.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Subject: Re: kde 3.5 in ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:22:52 -0000 --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 05:18:31PM -0500, Gerard Seibert wrote: > Kris Kennaway >=20 > > On Sat, Jan 14, 2006 at 07:23:12PM +0000, eoghan wrote: > > > Hello > > > So it looks like kde 3.5 has been committed to ports. > > > http://freebsd.kde.org/index.php#n20060108 > > > I just cvsup'd and: > > > # pkg_info -la | grep kde > > > still showing me 3.4.3... > > > Im using cvsup.ie.FreeBSD.org so perhaps some mirrors have not yet = =20 > > > been updated? > >=20 > > Looks like you forgot to actually upgrade your installed ports, you > > only updated the ports tree. > >=20 > > > Apart from this, I believe there was some issues with 3.5... anyone = =20 > > > got it up and going? > >=20 > > Works for me. > >=20 > > Kris >=20 > Yes, but it has already been updated to 5.5.0_1. That was sure quick. I > only got 3.5.0 installed before they bumped it up. No idea what this 5.5.0_1 is that you speak of. Kris --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDyXm6Wry0BWjoQKURAkqMAKCbu3HUSmQgURD2b3F9gufskK66FwCfYt5G rWg6DEi1HpK4GsdAh/CPwro= =moot -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rwEMma7ioTxnRzrJ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 22:30:04 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F44716A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:30:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jeremywillson@yahoo.com.au) Received: from web80910.mail.scd.yahoo.com (web80910.mail.scd.yahoo.com [66.218.95.76]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D0F9843D78 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:29:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jeremywillson@yahoo.com.au) Received: (qmail 16111 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Jan 2006 22:29:57 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=OyOESo7Wg83ZMcIutNGEmcs9FlxkfnRR66AcctA2S4rK8gxmk/6orhXLSEhnMhxMMGyhHDqfzCFPC4jSNmVURGCpN53GBZqy1CJ5KWUrYnjYDnlEDQYV/NminAFPyVrV9BougPERX6PtOOai6htK+8cTrG7Hz+jwgIupGyvm03I= ; Message-ID: <20060114222957.16109.qmail@web80910.mail.scd.yahoo.com> Received: from [203.3.126.224] by web80910.mail.scd.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 09:29:57 EST Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 09:29:57 +1100 (EST) From: Bob Willson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Difficulty asking questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:30:04 -0000 Hello I have been trying to ask questions of this forum for some time now but my questions seem to vanish into the wild blue ether. :( It is possible that my ISP has been blacklisted for this forum, how do I tell? My usual address (and the one which I registered) is: jwillson@brisbane.apana.org.au I am sending this through a Yahoo email address to see if this works. Bob Willson ____________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Listen to over 20 online radio stations and watch the latest music videos on Yahoo! Music. http://au.launch.yahoo.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 22:32:06 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 827B216A43A for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:32:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list@mindling.com) Received: from b.mail.sonic.net (b.mail.sonic.net [64.142.19.5]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D11C643D48 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:32:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list@mindling.com) Received: from [10.0.0.11] (64-142-39-120.dsl.static.sonic.net [64.142.39.120]) (authenticated bits=0) by b.mail.sonic.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k0EMW1GQ003931 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:32:01 -0800 Message-ID: <43C97BE6.5060901@mindling.com> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:32:06 -0800 From: Sebastian User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.5 (Windows/20050711) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd References: <43C96C73.9010904@mindling.com> <0T2rehckIn3Nv9%markus@bsd.trippelsdorf.de> In-Reply-To: <0T2rehckIn3Nv9%markus@bsd.trippelsdorf.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Getting around WRITE_DMA errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:32:06 -0000 Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: >Are you sure that your hard drive is not dying? >Run smartctl -a /dev/ad0 and see if any errors were being logged. >(smartctl is part of the smartmontools port) >You should also try another cable. > > Thanks for the response. I'm reasonably sure, the disk is brand new, and though it could certainly be bad, I installed Linux on the system this morning without issue. I've tried two different UDMA cables also, just to be sure. Under PIO4 mode in BSD (by setting hw.ata.ata_dma=0), I can install and then write data to my heart's content without any errors. I'm currently reinstalling again, because I believe a partition has become corrupted after panicking with the disk in UDMA6 mode. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 22:49:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30FC916A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:49:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from smtp3.suscom.net (smtp3.suscom.net [64.78.119.250]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF19643D5A for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:49:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by smtp3.suscom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C2722103BE for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:49:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp3.suscom.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp3.suscom.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 02889-01-2 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:48:53 -0500 (EST) Received: from seibercom.net (ip148.217.susc.suscom.net [216.45.217.148]) by smtp3.suscom.net (Postfix) with SMTP id F2AFE21013A for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:48:52 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (budman [192.168.0.2]) by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0EMms3O001692 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:48:54 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:48:57 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: gerard@seibercom.net Organization: Seibercom.net In-Reply-To: <20060114222957.16109.qmail@web80910.mail.scd.yahoo.com> References: <20060114222957.16109.qmail@web80910.mail.scd.yahoo.com> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20060114174601.E0B6.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.24.01 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88, clamav-milter version 0.87 on seibercom.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at suscom.net Subject: Re: Difficulty asking questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:49:47 -0000 Bob Willson > Hello > > I have been trying to ask questions of this forum for > some time now but my questions seem to vanish into the > wild blue ether. :( > > It is possible that my ISP has been blacklisted for > this forum, how do I tell? My usual address (and the > one which I registered) is: > jwillson@brisbane.apana.org.au > > I am sending this through a Yahoo email address to see > if this works. > > Bob Willson I tried running it through SPAMCOP, and this is what I got back. Parsing input: jwillson@brisbane.apana.org.au 203.3.126.1 is an mx ( 10 ) for brisbane.apana.org.au host 203.3.126.1 = gargoyle.apana.org.au (cached) No recent reports, no history available 203.3.126.1 is an mx ( 10 ) for brisbane.apana.org.au Routing details for 203.3.126.1 Reports routes for 203.3.126.1: routeid:17573795 203.3.124.0 - 203.3.127.255 to:matthew@arts.usyd.edu.au Administrator found from whois records [refresh/show] Cached whois for 203.3.126.1 : matthew@arts.usyd.edu.au Tracking details "whois 203.3.126.1@whois.apnic.net" (Getting contact from whois.apnic.net mirror) Display data: mg75-ap = matthew@arts.usyd.edu.au whois.apnic.net 203.3.126.1 = matthew@arts.usyd.edu.au whois: 203.3.124.0 - 203.3.127.255 = matthew@arts.usyd.edu.au Routing details for 203.3.126.1 Using last resort contacts matthew@arts.usyd.edu.au Using last resort contacts matthew@arts.usyd.edu.au Statistics: 203.3.126.1 not listed in bl.spamcop.net More Information.. 203.3.126.1 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org 203.3.126.1 not listed in dnsbl.njabl.org 203.3.126.1 not listed in cbl.abuseat.org 203.3.126.1 not listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net 203.3.126.1 not listed in relays.ordb.org. Reporting addresses: matthew@arts.usyd.edu.au I did not see anything about you being blocked by anyone. HTH -- Gerard Seibert gerard@seibercom.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 22:50:32 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 439BF16A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:50:32 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robertmunn2@comcast.net) Received: from listserv.umd.edu (listserv.umd.edu [128.8.10.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A9CC43D8D for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:50:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robertmunn2@comcast.net) Received: (from sendmail@localhost) by listserv.umd.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) id k0EMo47F009950 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:50:04 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:50:04 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200601142250.k0EMo47F009950@listserv.umd.edu> X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.umd.edu: sendmail set sender to robertmunn2@comcast.net using -f To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: robertmunn2@comcast.net Errors-to: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re: Difficulty asking questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: robertmunn2@comcast.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:50:32 -0000 Your message has been automatically forwarded to my new address: robertmunn2@comcast.net Please update your addressbooks and lists to reflect this new address. Old Address: munn@umd5.umd.edu New Address: robertmunn2@comcast.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 22:54:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A47216A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:54:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from smtp4.suscom.net (smtp4.suscom.net [64.78.119.247]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED5E243D76 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:54:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Received: from localhost (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by smtp4.suscom.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8929815005C for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:54:04 -0500 (EST) Received: from smtp4.suscom.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp4.suscom.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 26847-02-20 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:53:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from seibercom.net (ip148.217.susc.suscom.net [216.45.217.148]) by smtp4.suscom.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 5F5F0150058 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:53:58 -0500 (EST) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (budman [192.168.0.2]) by seibercom.net (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k0EMrxvc001755 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:53:59 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from gerard@seibercom.net) Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:54:02 -0500 From: Gerard Seibert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Sender: gerard@seibercom.net Organization: Seibercom.net In-Reply-To: <20060114222250.GA54853@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060114171607.9951.GERARD@seibercom.net> <20060114222250.GA54853@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Face: "\j?x](l|]4p?-1Bf@!wN<&p=$.}^k-HgL}cJKbQZ3r#Ar]\%U(#6}'?<3s7%(%(gxJxxcR nSNPNr*/^~StawWU9KDJ-CT0k$f#@t2^K&BS_f|?ZV/.7Q Message-Id: <20060114175226.E0B9.GERARD@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Mailer: Becky! ver. 2.24.01 [en] X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.88, clamav-milter version 0.87 on seibercom.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at suscom.net Subject: Re: kde 3.5 in ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:54:18 -0000 Kris Kennaway > > Yes, but it has already been updated to 5.5.0_1. That was sure quick. I > > only got 3.5.0 installed before they bumped it up. > > No idea what this 5.5.0_1 is that you speak of. > > Kris It is French for "3.5.0_1". -- Gerard Vini, vidi, velcro... I came, I saw, I stuck around From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 22:54:43 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1687116A423 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:54:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robertmunn2@comcast.net) Received: from listserv.umd.edu (listserv.umd.edu [128.8.10.60]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EC3B43D45 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:54:42 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from robertmunn2@comcast.net) Received: (from sendmail@localhost) by listserv.umd.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) id k0EMsiTX012813 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:54:44 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:54:44 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200601142254.k0EMsiTX012813@listserv.umd.edu> X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.umd.edu: sendmail set sender to robertmunn2@comcast.net using -f To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: robertmunn2@comcast.net Errors-to: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Re: kde 3.5 in ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: robertmunn2@comcast.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:54:43 -0000 Your message has been automatically forwarded to my new address: robertmunn2@comcast.net Please update your addressbooks and lists to reflect this new address. Old Address: munn@umd5.umd.edu New Address: robertmunn2@comcast.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 23:02:47 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D9D316A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 23:02:47 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6EEB43D45 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 23:02:46 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91F891A3C1C; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:02:46 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EC8F752744; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:02:45 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:02:45 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Bob Willson Message-ID: <20060114230245.GA55760@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060114222957.16109.qmail@web80910.mail.scd.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060114222957.16109.qmail@web80910.mail.scd.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Difficulty asking questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 23:02:47 -0000 --2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 09:29:57AM +1100, Bob Willson wrote: > Hello > =20 > I have been trying to ask questions of this forum for > some time now but my questions seem to vanish into the > wild blue ether. :( > > It is possible that my ISP has been blacklisted for > this forum, how do I tell? My usual address (and the > one which I registered) is: > jwillson@brisbane.apana.org.au Use the web interface to the mailing lists to verify your subscription, or if that fails then talk to postmaster. Kris > I am sending this through a Yahoo email address to see > if this works. >=20 > Bob Willson >=20 >=20 > =09 > ____________________________________________________=20 > Do you Yahoo!?=20 > Listen to over 20 online radio stations and watch the latest music videos= on Yahoo! Music.=20 > http://au.launch.yahoo.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" >=20 --2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDyYMVWry0BWjoQKURAreaAKCf2DyhvfSBsE5EdRmmocl0LROKagCg9Koz tkK33bE4l/djp1fCJGnJW9Y= =qgoe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 23:19:18 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C897516A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 23:19:18 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jeremywillson@yahoo.com.au) Received: from web80905.mail.scd.yahoo.com (web80905.mail.scd.yahoo.com [66.218.95.68]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0392443D48 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 23:19:17 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jeremywillson@yahoo.com.au) Received: (qmail 40715 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Jan 2006 23:19:17 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=GJpnrpbf0n8xl7QW2LCfJLTFGKHf5/R+NgwZf0R+RS/fZlf8sejyYwnLC93Du0QXSMko0a1E7uhv+67rrtImg1KpsSP/vSajj1WjdX0SSF8OUKl4yNzmj+yzzwacfpdaHQQ5Q+Gn1gyUc0F0lcqsag73oE7FIchwCSzuWgvrAl8= ; Message-ID: <20060114231917.40713.qmail@web80905.mail.scd.yahoo.com> Received: from [203.3.126.224] by web80905.mail.scd.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 10:19:17 EST Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 10:19:17 +1100 (EST) From: Bob Willson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Difficulty asking questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 23:19:18 -0000 --- Garance A Drosihn wrote: > At 9:29 AM +1100 1/15/06, Bob Willson wrote: > >Hello > > > >I have been trying to ask questions of this forum > for > >some time now but my questions seem to vanish into > the > >wild blue ether. :( > > > >It is possible that my ISP has been blacklisted for > >this forum, how do I tell? My usual address (and > the > >one which I registered) is: > >jwillson@brisbane.apana.org.au > > > >I am sending this through a Yahoo email address to > see > > if this works. > > If it helps, I did see this message of yours from > the > freebsd-questions mailing list. I usually just skim > through this mailing list though, so I have no idea > if > if your previous messages (from some other address?) > also made it through. > > It is true that this list is busy enough that > questions > can get lost. Which is to say, everyone *receives* > the > message, but no one actually replies to it simply > because > they're too busy with other things. OK, thanks for the replies I did get this through the Yahoo mail address on the web interface. I have checked all my settings on the freebsd-questions web page as well and they are all correct. I get the two or three daily reports FROM the forum, but I just don't seem able to post TO it. Any ideas why not? > -- > Garance Alistair Drosehn = > gad@gilead.netel.rpi.edu > Senior Systems Programmer or > gad@freebsd.org > Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute or > drosih@rpi.edu > ____________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! News: Get the latest news via video today! http://au.news.yahoo.com/video/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 23:31:02 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17BC116A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 23:31:02 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jeremywillson@yahoo.com.au) Received: from web80910.mail.scd.yahoo.com (web80910.mail.scd.yahoo.com [66.218.95.76]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4965943D48 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 23:31:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jeremywillson@yahoo.com.au) Received: (qmail 37226 invoked by uid 60001); 14 Jan 2006 23:31:00 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com.au; h=Message-ID:Received:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=v3oGc0b4uAaIyT5hxj6rUBXE5MPdOIIope2d/+hSlH4EQ0eRBKmIsadIgTMECg3elbM36kZ57S2m3evvxQDyaREauPV6Rz+rmS4zpUFGQ0lA4T0bEBJUFxkgDqKfZhpawMGmxqrOVaWvPQsOg0o1tzrGrVjMdf34nHu8OstYXio= ; Message-ID: <20060114233100.37212.qmail@web80910.mail.scd.yahoo.com> Received: from [203.3.126.224] by web80910.mail.scd.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 10:31:00 EST Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 10:31:00 +1100 (EST) From: Bob Willson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: jwillson@brisbane.apana.org.au Subject: Fwd: Re: Difficulty asking questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 23:31:02 -0000 --- Bob Willson wrote: > From Bob Willson Sun Jan 15 10:25:51 2006 Received: from [203.3.126.224] by web80908.mail.scd.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 10:25:51 EST Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 10:25:51 +1100 (EST) From: Bob Willson Subject: Fwd: Re: Difficulty asking questions To: question-freebsd@freebsd.org CC: jwillson@brisbane.apana.org.au MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 925 Below is the complete header from an email that I sent to questions. It would appear that Robert Munn gets the questions and then forwards(or doesn't in my case) to the list From robertmunn2@comcast.net Sat Jan 14 14:31:15 2006 X-Apparently-To: jeremywillson@yahoo.com.au via 66.218.95.71; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:31:14 -0800 X-Originating-IP: [128.8.10.60] Return-Path: Authentication-Results: mta308.mail.mud.yahoo.com from=comcast.net; domainkeys=neutral (no sig) Received: from 128.8.10.60 (EHLO listserv.umd.edu) (128.8.10.60) by mta308.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:31:14 -0800 Received: (from sendmail@localhost) by listserv.umd.edu (8.12.10/8.12.10) id k0EMVF8o028545 for jeremywillson@yahoo.com.au; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:31:15 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:31:15 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <200601142231.k0EMVF8o028545@listserv.umd.edu> X-Authentication-Warning: listserv.umd.edu: sendmail set sender to robertmunn2@comcast.net using -f To: jeremywillson@yahoo.com.au From: robertmunn2@comcast.net Add to Address Book Reply-to: robertmunn2@comcast.net Errors-to: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Difficulty asking questions Content-Length: 236 Your message has been automatically forwarded to my new address: robertmunn2@comcast.net Please update your addressbooks and lists to reflect this new address. Old Address: munn@umd5.umd.edu New Address: robertmunn2@comcast.net --- robertmunn2@comcast.net wrote: > From robertmunn2@comcast.net Sat Jan 14 14:31:15 > 2006 > Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:31:15 -0500 (EST) > To: jeremywillson@yahoo.com.au > From: robertmunn2@comcast.net > Subject: Re: Difficulty asking questions > > Your message has been automatically forwarded > to my new address: > > robertmunn2@comcast.net > > Please update your addressbooks and lists to > reflect this new address. > > Old Address: munn@umd5.umd.edu > New Address: robertmunn2@comcast.net > ____________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? The New Yahoo! Movies: Check out the Latest Trailers, Premiere Photos and full Actor Database. http://au.movies.yahoo.com ____________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Music: Vote 'Who's Next' and see your favourite band live http://au.music.yahoo.com/artists/whos-next/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 23:40:30 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 457C616A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 23:40:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFE9343D45 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 23:40:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C79361A3C24; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:40:29 -0800 (PST) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2D58B52744; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:40:29 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:40:28 -0500 From: Kris Kennaway To: Bob Willson Message-ID: <20060114234028.GA56350@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20060114233100.37212.qmail@web80910.mail.scd.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20060114233100.37212.qmail@web80910.mail.scd.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: jwillson@brisbane.apana.org.au, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: Difficulty asking questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 23:40:30 -0000 --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 10:31:00AM +1100, Bob Willson wrote: > --- Bob Willson wrote: > > From Bob Willson Sun Jan 15 10:25:51 2006 > Received: from [203.3.126.224] by > web80908.mail.scd.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 15 Jan > 2006 10:25:51 EST > Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 10:25:51 +1100 (EST) > From: Bob Willson > Subject: Fwd: Re: Difficulty asking questions > To: question-freebsd@freebsd.org > CC: jwillson@brisbane.apana.org.au > MIME-Version: 1.0 > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Diso-8859-1 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > Content-Length: 925 > =20 > Below is the complete header from an email that I > sent > to questions. It would appear that Robert Munn gets > the questions and then forwards(or doesn't in my > case) > to the list No, he's just a lamer who can't configure his mail settings properly :-( Kris --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDyYvsWry0BWjoQKURAtN9AKCCo99y4gyZyIX8ONSQTgx4msCQqQCfTFle xSFtn+uaQsviGutnXxFGKNA= =hXhz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 23:42:12 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D75616A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 23:42:12 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dead_line@hotmail.com) Received: from hotmail.com (bay20-f23.bay20.hotmail.com [64.4.54.112]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA00B43D5A for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 23:42:11 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from dead_line@hotmail.com) Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:42:11 -0800 Message-ID: Received: from 65.34.154.23 by by20fd.bay20.hotmail.msn.com with HTTP; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 23:42:10 GMT X-Originating-IP: [65.34.154.23] X-Originating-Email: [dead_line@hotmail.com] X-Sender: dead_line@hotmail.com In-Reply-To: <20060114132225.5867.qmail@web3305.mail.bbt.yahoo.co.jp> From: "Marwan Sultan" To: home_post01@yahoo.co.jp Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 23:42:10 +0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed X-OriginalArrivalTime: 14 Jan 2006 23:42:11.0132 (UTC) FILETIME=[23996FC0:01C61964] Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: It is old. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 23:42:12 -0000 > >Everyone says that FreeBSD is old. >Hereafter, many people will say that Linux and OpenSolaris are >good. > Hmmm! Old is Gold! in a condition its not a wife! its a FreeBSD! _________________________________________________________________ FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar - get it now! http://toolbar.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200415ave/direct/01/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 23:45:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A0BA16A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 23:45:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list@mindling.com) Received: from a.mail.sonic.net (a.mail.sonic.net [64.142.16.245]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9246A43D46 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 23:45:28 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list@mindling.com) Received: from [10.0.0.11] (64-142-39-120.dsl.static.sonic.net [64.142.39.120]) (authenticated bits=0) by a.mail.sonic.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id k0ENjSGl021582 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:45:28 -0800 Message-ID: <43C98D1A.8030909@mindling.com> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 15:45:30 -0800 From: Sebastian User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.5 (Windows/20050711) X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 CC: freebsd References: <43C96C73.9010904@mindling.com> <0T2rehckIn3Nv9%markus@bsd.trippelsdorf.de> <43C97BE6.5060901@mindling.com> In-Reply-To: <43C97BE6.5060901@mindling.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Getting around WRITE_DMA errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 23:45:29 -0000 Sebastian wrote: > Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > >> Are you sure that your hard drive is not dying? Run smartctl -a >> /dev/ad0 and see if any errors were being logged. >> (smartctl is part of the smartmontools port) >> You should also try another cable. >> >> > Thanks for the response. I'm reasonably sure, the disk is brand new, > and though it could certainly be bad, I installed Linux on the system > this morning without issue. I've tried two different UDMA cables also, > just to be sure. Under PIO4 mode in BSD (by setting hw.ata.ata_dma=0), > I can install and then write data to my heart's content without any > errors. > > I'm currently reinstalling again, because I believe a partition has > become corrupted after panicking with the disk in UDMA6 mode. > Just as a followup: Attempting to run "atacontrol mode ad0 UDMA6" resulted in WRITE_DMA48 errors and a panic. Afterwards, disk access was slow, and trying to use _any_ UDMA mode resulted in DMA errors being logged, and eventually another panic. Having briefly tested UDMA3-5 with success previously, I felt that the partitions must have been corrupted somehow, so I reinstalled FreeBSD from scratch. It's better, after booting with "hw.ata.ata_dma=0" and then running "atacontrol mode ad0 UDMA5", it's running fine using UDMA5 and copying lots of data around: # atacontrol mode ad0 current mode = UDMA100 So my question remains: How do I tell FreeBSD to use UDMA5 on this drive at boot-time? Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 14 23:54:59 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 035EC16A41F for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 23:54:59 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@i13i.com) Received: from admin.i13i.com (admin.i13i.com [66.90.92.83]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8B05143D46 for ; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 23:54:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from chris@i13i.com) Received: (qmail 13395 invoked from network); 15 Jan 2006 00:16:11 -0000 Received: from mail.i13i.com (HELO webmail.i13i.com) (208.53.187.133) by admin.i13i.com with SMTP; 15 Jan 2006 00:16:11 -0000 Received: from 195.139.252.5 (proxying for 62.92.188.12) (SquirrelMail authenticated user chris@i13i.com) by webmail.i13i.com with HTTP; Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:16:11 -0600 (CST) Message-ID: <59153.195.139.252.5.1137284171.squirrel@webmail.i13i.com> In-Reply-To: <43C98D1A.8030909@mindling.com> References: <43C96C73.9010904@mindling.com> <0T2rehckIn3Nv9%markus@bsd.trippelsdorf.de> <43C97BE6.5060901@mindling.com> <43C98D1A.8030909@mindling.com> Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:16:11 -0600 (CST) From: chris@i13i.com To: "Sebastian" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Cc: freebsd Subject: Re: Getting around WRITE_DMA errors X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 23:54:59 -0000 Try the bios ? > Sebastian wrote: > >> Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: >> >>> Are you sure that your hard drive is not dying? Run smartctl -a >>> /dev/ad0 and see if any errors were being logged. >>> (smartctl is part of the smartmontools port) >>> You should also try another cable. >>> >>> >> Thanks for the response. I'm reasonably sure, the disk is brand new, >> and though it could certainly be bad, I installed Linux on the system >> this morning without issue. I've tried two different UDMA cables also, >> just to be sure. Under PIO4 mode in BSD (by setting hw.ata.ata_dma=0), >> I can install and then write data to my heart's content without any >> errors. >> >> I'm currently reinstalling again, because I believe a partition has >> become corrupted after panicking with the disk in UDMA6 mode. >> > > Just as a followup: Attempting to run "atacontrol mode ad0 UDMA6" > resulted in WRITE_DMA48 errors and a panic. Afterwards, disk access was > slow, and trying to use _any_ UDMA mode resulted in DMA errors being > logged, and eventually another panic. > > Having briefly tested UDMA3-5 with success previously, I felt that the > partitions must have been corrupted somehow, so I reinstalled FreeBSD > from scratch. It's better, after booting with "hw.ata.ata_dma=0" and > then running "atacontrol mode ad0 UDMA5", it's running fine using UDMA5 > and copying lots of data around: > # atacontrol mode ad0 > current mode = UDMA100 > > So my question remains: How do I tell FreeBSD to use UDMA5 on this drive > at boot-time? > > Thanks. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >