From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 25 12:50:02 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 912E11065673 for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 12:50:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sepotvin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from relais.videotron.ca (relais.videotron.ca [24.201.245.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A23E8FC17 for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 12:50:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sepotvin@FreeBSD.org) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Received: from yoda.telcobridges.com ([67.70.237.74]) by VL-MH-MR002.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-4.01 (built Aug 3 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTPA id <0K6500M16QBDVW30@VL-MH-MR002.ip.videotron.ca> for freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 08:50:01 -0400 (EDT) Message-id: <48B2AA79.2070805@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 08:50:01 -0400 From: "Stephane E. Potvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080730) To: Andy Rozman References: <48B04E63.9020607@triera.net> In-reply-to: <48B04E63.9020607@triera.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Cc: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ganymede and ANT X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 12:50:02 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Andy Rozman wrote: | Hi ! | | I have finally managed to succesfully build Ganymede (thanks Stephane), | but now I have problems with ant under eclipse. | | Till now I always used ant outside eclipse IDE, but now after moving to | FreeBSD from windows I would like to do this in eclipse, but I have | problems. I created simple build file, and when I start it I get | nothing. Just in console (status line it tells my that it java was | terminated. I have two jdks installed on system 1.5 and 1.6 and I am | developing projects with jdk 1.5 (need for compatibility). | | So my console window is empty and nothing was done. I tried playing | arround with settings a little, but since I never used ant in eclipse | before I have no idea where problem could be... | Hi Andy, Could you please provide more details? Ant support is working as it should afaict over here. Steph -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkiyqngACgkQmdOXtTCX/nvfQgCgvWxcpZwyENyVwjWtjbtqwqiT 7RcAoKXEbBnGwu4cnOrH6BqIAKFzsoGa =/Fv3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 25 22:46:27 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6971106567C for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 22:46:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sepotvin@videotron.ca) Received: from relais.videotron.ca (relais.videotron.ca [24.201.245.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A55E18FC08 for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 22:46:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sepotvin@videotron.ca) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Received: from leia.telcobridges.com ([96.21.231.154]) by VL-MH-MR001.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-4.01 (built Aug 3 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0K6600NFEHXE5AN8@VL-MH-MR001.ip.videotron.ca> for freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 18:46:27 -0400 (EDT) Message-id: <48B3363B.6090605@videotron.ca> Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 18:46:19 -0400 From: "Stephane E. Potvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080726) To: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Subject: x86_64 vs amd64 arch name for Eclipse X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 22:46:27 -0000 Hi, I'd like to do a quick poll to check what is the opinion of the eclipse port users with regard to the subject. Currently, for reasons that I've not been able to figure out with certainty all the FreeBSD eclipse version use amd64 as the arch specifier. The eclipse platform itself uses x86_64 as the arch specifier for the other intel 64bit ports. Would anyone see a problem with switching back the arch to x86_64 for eclipse-ganymede (and it's successors). There seems to be various places in the source code where assumptions are made that all intel x86 64bit platforms have an arch of x86_64. I tracked down a few of them but it seems that I overlooked some. I'm currently trying to add FreeBSD support to cdt 5.0 and the PDE builder keeps insisting that the 64bit fragments must be named foo.freebsd.x86_64. If people feels strongly against switching to x86_64 I'll track the PDE problem down but I think it would be best to spend efforts somewhere else and follow prior art (the other x86_64 ports) in this case. What's your opinion? Steph From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 25 23:05:10 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BF84106566B for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:05:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mbowie@buzmo.com) Received: from mail172.messagelabs.com (mail172.messagelabs.com [216.82.254.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBF3D8FC1A for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:05:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mbowie@buzmo.com) X-VirusChecked: Checked X-Env-Sender: mbowie@buzmo.com X-Msg-Ref: server-4.tower-172.messagelabs.com!1219705508!22643611!1 X-StarScan-Version: 5.5.12.14.2; banners=-,-,- X-Originating-IP: [69.12.11.77] Received: (qmail 9812 invoked from network); 25 Aug 2008 23:05:09 -0000 Received: from smtp1.dfw.fabriclabs.com (HELO smtp1.dfw.fabriclabs.com) (69.12.11.77) by server-4.tower-172.messagelabs.com with AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 25 Aug 2008 23:05:09 -0000 Received: from Macintosh.sv.fabriclabs.net ([99.7.126.96]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp1.dfw.fabriclabs.com (8.13.7/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m7PN5E8W091899; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 18:05:14 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from mbowie@buzmo.com) Message-ID: <48B33AA2.9000105@buzmo.com> Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 16:05:06 -0700 From: Mike Bowie User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Macintosh/20080707) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Stephane E. Potvin" References: <48B3363B.6090605@videotron.ca> In-Reply-To: <48B3363B.6090605@videotron.ca> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Subject: Re: x86_64 vs amd64 arch name for Eclipse X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:05:10 -0000 Stephane E. Potvin wrote: > If people feels strongly against switching to x86_64 I'll track the PDE > problem down but I think it would be best to spend efforts somewhere > else and follow prior art (the other x86_64 ports) in this case. > > What's your opinion? > Hey Stephane, I'd personally prefer to see FreeBSD's Eclipse port as close to the Eclipse trunk as it can be... it would have a good deal of effort and time on future ports and even (as you're demonstrating) in plugins etc. Long story short, I'd like to see x86_64 adopted for the port and future works. Cheers, Mike -- "You don't see FreeBSD developers sitting in a smoke-filled room plotting the overthrow of Microsoft. We sit in light, airy rooms and plot where to get the best drinks." - Michael Lucas From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 25 23:15:08 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5418106564A for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:15:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sepotvin@videotron.ca) Received: from relais.videotron.ca (relais.videotron.ca [24.201.245.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3B128FC12 for ; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:15:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sepotvin@videotron.ca) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Received: from leia.telcobridges.com ([96.21.231.154]) by VL-MH-MR001.ip.videotron.ca (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-4.01 (built Aug 3 2007; 32bit)) with ESMTP id <0K66004MUJ97HIJ8@VL-MH-MR001.ip.videotron.ca> for freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org; Mon, 25 Aug 2008 19:15:08 -0400 (EDT) Message-id: <48B33CFA.8040201@videotron.ca> Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 19:15:06 -0400 From: "Stephane E. Potvin" User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080726) To: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.6 Subject: x86_64 vs amd64 arch name for Eclipse X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 23:15:09 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'd like to do a quick poll to check what is the opinion of the eclipse port users with regard to the subject. Currently, for reasons that I've not been able to figure out with certainty all the FreeBSD eclipse version use amd64 as the arch specifier. The eclipse platform itself uses x86_64 as the arch specifier for the other intel 64bit ports. Would anyone see a problem with switching back the arch to x86_64 for eclipse-ganymede (and it's successors). There seems to be various places in the source code where assumptions are made that all intel x86 64bit platforms have an arch of x86_64. I tracked down a few of them but it seems that I overlooked some. I'm currently trying to add FreeBSD support to cdt 5.0 and the PDE builder keeps insisting that the 64bit fragments must be named foo.freebsd.x86_64. If people feels strongly against switching to x86_64 I'll track the PDE problem down but I think it would be best to spend efforts somewhere else and follow prior art (the other x86_64 ports) in this case. What's your opinion? Steph -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkizPPoACgkQmdOXtTCX/nuAaACguzyBAQE5XXHmqE7gEzczCgi7 wWcAn1mmmg/iI/AV4mnrCo8TZbxwVhdo =HqHm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 26 01:52:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3CA61065670 for ; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 01:52:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ken@tydfam.jp) Received: from tydfam.jp (ns.tydfam.jp [61.197.228.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 282848FC15 for ; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 01:52:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ken@tydfam.jp) Received: from localhost (tyd3.sub.tydfam.jp [192.168.1.3]) by tydfam.jp (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m7Q1qu3u092133; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 10:52:57 +0900 (JST) (envelope-from ken@tydfam.jp) Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 10:52:37 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20080826.105237.956847443352425935.ken@tydfam.jp> To: sepotvin@videotron.ca From: ken In-Reply-To: <48B3363B.6090605@videotron.ca> References: <48B3363B.6090605@videotron.ca> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.1 on Emacs 22.2 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.92.1, clamav-milter version 0.92.1 on daemon.sub.tydfam.jp X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=9.5 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.2.3 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on daemon.sub.tydfam.jp Cc: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Subject: Re: x86_64 vs amd64 arch name for Eclipse X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 01:52:41 -0000 Steph, It reduces large part of boring porting work, and I prefer to use x86_64 rather than amd64 internally. However, if users need to use the word "x86_64" explicitly for compilation, it may not be a preferred choice from port/src tree consistency viewpoint. In short, one to "x86_64" if it is handled internally and explanation for amd64 vs x86_64 is given. From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 26 19:40:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E378106566B for ; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 19:40:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rick@kiwi-computer.com) Received: from kiwi-computer.com (keira.kiwi-computer.com [63.224.10.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 923018FC1E for ; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 19:40:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rick@kiwi-computer.com) Received: (qmail 37643 invoked by uid 2001); 26 Aug 2008 19:13:41 -0000 Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 14:13:41 -0500 From: "Rick C. Petty" To: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20080826191341.GA37568@keira.kiwi-computer.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Subject: wrong JAVA_VENDOR X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: rick-freebsd2008@kiwi-computer.com List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 19:40:24 -0000 If you install java/diablo-jdk16 instead of java/jdk16, the JAVA_VENDOR is "freebsd". The java/eclipse Makefile sets JAVA_VENDOR to "bsdjava". Why is this? This makes it so that you cannot run eclipse with only diablo-jdk16 installed. Why is it even being set? Isn't it enough that we use JAVA_OS=native ??? I suggest the following patch: --- ports/java/eclipse/Makefile.orig 2008-08-14 19:17:21.000000000 -0500 +++ ports/java/eclipse/Makefile 2008-08-26 19:13:03.000000000 -0500 @@ -60,10 +60,6 @@ .include -.if ${OSVERSION} >= 700000 -JAVA_VENDOR= bsdjava -.endif - .if !defined(WITHOUT_MOZILLA) MAKE_MOZILLA= make_mozilla BROWSER= ${GECKO} -- Rick C. Petty From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 27 00:47:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D92C5106566B for ; Wed, 27 Aug 2008 00:47:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) Received: from misty.eyesbeyond.com (gerbercreations.com [71.39.140.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18AC88FC19 for ; Wed, 27 Aug 2008 00:47:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) Received: from misty.eyesbeyond.com (localhost.eyesbeyond.com [127.0.0.1]) by misty.eyesbeyond.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m7R0Z9Zc047125; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:35:10 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) Received: (from glewis@localhost) by misty.eyesbeyond.com (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m7R0Z9Ia047124; Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:35:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) X-Authentication-Warning: misty.eyesbeyond.com: glewis set sender to glewis@eyesbeyond.com using -f Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2008 17:35:08 -0700 From: Greg Lewis To: "Rick C. Petty" Message-ID: <20080827003508.GA39878@misty.eyesbeyond.com> References: <20080826191341.GA37568@keira.kiwi-computer.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20080826191341.GA37568@keira.kiwi-computer.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Cc: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Subject: Re: wrong JAVA_VENDOR X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2008 00:47:23 -0000 On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 02:13:41PM -0500, Rick C. Petty wrote: > If you install java/diablo-jdk16 instead of java/jdk16, the JAVA_VENDOR is > "freebsd". The java/eclipse Makefile sets JAVA_VENDOR to "bsdjava". Why > is this? This makes it so that you cannot run eclipse with only > diablo-jdk16 installed. Why is it even being set? Isn't it enough that we > use JAVA_OS=native ??? I suggest the following patch: This is because people would install diablo-jdk15 on FreeBSD 7.x. This will run Java programmes if you have compat6x installed and some libmap entries set up, but it won't run Eclipse. Now that we have diablo-jdk16 which has a native 7.x version we could change 700000 to 800000, but the risk is that people on 7.x with diablo-jdk15 already installed will then be able to install with it guaranteed to break. I'll try an alternative change. > --- ports/java/eclipse/Makefile.orig 2008-08-14 19:17:21.000000000 -0500 > +++ ports/java/eclipse/Makefile 2008-08-26 19:13:03.000000000 -0500 > @@ -60,10 +60,6 @@ > > .include > > -.if ${OSVERSION} >= 700000 > -JAVA_VENDOR= bsdjava > -.endif > - > .if !defined(WITHOUT_MOZILLA) > MAKE_MOZILLA= make_mozilla > BROWSER= ${GECKO} > > > -- Rick C. Petty > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-eclipse > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-eclipse-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Greg Lewis Email : glewis@eyesbeyond.com Eyes Beyond Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com Information Technology FreeBSD : glewis@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-eclipse@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 28 13:33:12 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF3461065675 for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:33:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikita.the.tzadik@gmail.com) Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com (ug-out-1314.google.com [66.249.92.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62E278FC08 for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:33:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikita.the.tzadik@gmail.com) Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id o4so1078656uge.39 for ; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 06:33:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :content-disposition; bh=rLLxAGYyrNtzAV3DpiJI5ZNcXI/VGJlYK7soESe7Log=; b=om0e5/SQzLGAGIuqb7yZfM99PrNn9DUDmU2tocPZLjpBsMtd5ZJmcOwAPvKX76V2ZU i8sO9JnTKvvr3vh6rYQ6yrRvtKFefNLYp2DkltMdImtSyzh+qSj7yYiTSYxwjo6FkGJ4 qo6Je6UNk/3jb8y8hIB7I+abocG5a64h0fh+I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=vdfB4hlI1nXMFWN1eAWj6A0BARCEtcaqjhK3iFcuOzX49UCmb+4/xtSRurtJGieg8y 8il0ilPtJZrznH9dRhJxpfPcf4iHDCU3I/5Ua4ZoyuWJqyJMQ+XasYZhgY0uMFXw2iq0 7BIF16DZ1Fmtcxp1P3Z1RM5BYIzj58nDDzIak= Received: by 10.66.244.11 with SMTP id r11mr3323802ugh.47.1219928418160; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 06:00:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.210.124.3 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Aug 2008 06:00:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4e99a0810808280600h65c628d2u116c76cecdfac16c@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 09:00:18 -0400 From: "f. nikita thomas" To: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Subject: freebsd 7.0 release / eclipse 3.2.2 / eclipse-cdt 3.1.2 not configured X-BeenThere: freebsd-eclipse@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "FreeBSD users of eclipse EDI, tools, rich client apps & ports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2008 13:33:12 -0000 hey, i've recently installed the port and have had no success getting the the plugin to work. when i go to help->software updates->manage configuration i noticed that for the c/c++ plugin was not active. under properties->status the following: The feature is not configured properly. Plug-in "org.eclipse.cdt.core.freebsd" version "3.1.2" referenced by this feature is missing. Plug-in "org.eclipse.cdt.core.freebsd.x86" version "3.1.2.200702150621" referenced by this feature is missing. when i go to /usr/local/eclipse/plugins there are folders for both. i can use the java ide fine. unfortunately i need this for class. any help will ... thanks -- Imagination is more important than knowledge "Albert Einstein"