From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 20 06:33:46 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2B5F106566B for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 06:33:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from vlakno.cz (77-93-215-190.static.masterinter.net [77.93.215.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E3A48FC1A for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 06:33:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A3BF9CB0D8; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 08:30:20 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vlakno.cz Received: from vlakno.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lev.vlakno.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ah7a0Yu3ACtv; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 08:30:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from vlk.vlakno.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AB129CB28F; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 08:30:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from rdivacky@localhost) by vlk.vlakno.cz (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n8K6UHs1013039; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 08:30:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rdivacky) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 08:30:17 +0200 From: Roman Divacky To: Alexander Leidinger Message-ID: <20090920063017.GA12687@freebsd.org> References: <20090919223624.00004f42@unknown> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090919223624.00004f42@unknown> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Alexander Best , freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: compat.linux.osrelease behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 06:33:46 -0000 On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 10:36:24PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:08:31 +0200 (CEST) Alexander Best > wrote: > > > > hi there, > > > > i have a question regarding the behavior of compat.linux.osrelease. > > setting it to 2.4.2 sets linuxulator into 2.4 kernel-emulation and > > 2.6.16 sets it into 2.6 kernel-emulation right? > > Sort of. 2.6.x set's 2.6 mode, and everything else is 2.4 mode. But > this is AFAIK only a semantic change of some functions. This does not > disable syscalls which are in 2.6 but not in 2.4. > > > but what happens when compat.linux.osrelease gets set to a different > > value? ports/Updating entry 20071101 e.g. advises skype users to set > > compat.linux.osrelease to 2.4.20. does this trigger 2.6 > > kernel-emulation because 2.4.20 > 2.4.2 or are there more than two > > kernel-emulation layers inside the linuxulator?? > > It does not affect the kernel emulation. But the glibc will try to use > new syscalls. actually it does change how the kernel emulation works. grep for linux_use26() From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 20 08:50:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 091FD106566C for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 08:50:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yurtesen@ispro.net) Received: from mail.ispro.net (mail.ispro.net [87.251.0.19]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 151578FC13 for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 08:50:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13541 invoked by uid 399); 20 Sep 2009 08:50:02 -0000 Received: from dsl-tkubrasgw1-fe1efa00-39.dhcp.inet.fi (HELO ?192.168.0.100?) (yurtesen@ispro.net@84.250.30.39) by mail.ispro.net with ESMTPAM; 20 Sep 2009 08:50:02 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 84.250.30.39 Message-ID: <4AB5ECF3.3020404@ispro.net> Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 11:50:59 +0300 From: Evren Yurtesen User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Windows/20090812) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Alexander Kabaev References: <4AB4016D.5070508@ispro.net> <4AB4035E.2030907@ispro.net> <20090919100724.1165f685@ernst.jennejohn.org> <20090919190022.3b046b1a@kan.dnsalias.net> In-Reply-To: <20090919190022.3b046b1a@kan.dnsalias.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: emulation@FreeBSD.org, gary.jennejohn@freenet.de Subject: Re: E:Attach to pid 54301 failed: Function not implemented X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 08:50:06 -0000 Alexander Kabaev wrote: > On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 10:07:24 +0200 > Gary Jennejohn wrote: > >> On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 01:02:06 +0300 >> Evren Yurtesen wrote: >> >>> Evren Yurtesen wrote: >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I am trying to use the Intel Software Development Emulator on >>>> FreeBSD 8 >>>> >>>> http://software.intel.com/en-us/articles/intel-software-development-emulator/ >>>> >>>> >>>> with the linux_base-f10 port however I am getting the following >>>> error: >>>> >>>> # ./sde -- /bin/csh >>>> E:Attach to pid 54304 failed: Function not implemented >>>> >>>> Is this something which can be fixed or should I forget about it? >>>> >> It could probably be fixed, but it may require lots of effort. >> >> The arguments to the Linux ptrace(2) are different (some are pointers >> instead of ints) and it wouldn't surprise me in the least to find that >> ptrace(2) in Linux behaves differently than under FreeBSD. >> >>> I just realized this in logs also: >>> >>> linux: pid 54303 (pinbin): syscall ptrace not implemented > ptrace _was_ implemented for Linux at some point. See > sys/i386/linux/linux_ptrace.c. > linux_ptrace.c doesnt appear at the amd64 side in /usr/src/sys/amd64/linux32 ? (I forgot to mention that I was using amd64). It would be nice if I could get the Intel's software working but if not, I can use Linux instead. Thanks for the information. Thanks, Evren From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 20 17:15:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 079AC106568B for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:15:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) Received: from mout7.freenet.de (mout7.freenet.de [IPv6:2001:748:100:40::2:9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BBF68FC12 for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:15:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [195.4.92.15] (helo=5.mx.freenet.de) by mout7.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.69 #92) id 1MpQ06-0003Kv-EP for emulation@freebsd.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 19:15:02 +0200 Received: from tfcfb.t.pppool.de ([89.55.252.251]:61972 helo=ernst.jennejohn.org) by 5.mx.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.69 #94) id 1MpQ06-0004W8-7a for emulation@freebsd.org; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 19:15:02 +0200 Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 19:15:01 +0200 From: Gary Jennejohn To: emulation@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090920191501.3d4d2c8a@ernst.jennejohn.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.16.2; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: VirtualBox/kernel broken? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gary.jennejohn@freenet.de List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 17:15:04 -0000 So, I have a problem with VirtualBox and can't say whether it's a problem with VirtualBox itself or something which has changed in the kernel. I'm running FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT Wed Sep 16 11:40:19 CEST 2009 amd64. I installed both the port and the latest stuff from svn. The problem is with an installation of Windows 7 RC which was working fine with an older version of the port (can't say from when, though) AND of the kernel. Today I decided to try the latest version of VirtualBox and the W7RC fails upon booting with an internal VirtualBox error. Strangely enough, if I start W7RC in repair mode it happily runs to completion, but then the boot fails with the above mentioned error. Booting from the ISO also fails. I have all kinds of log files from VirtualBox which I can't parse. Interestingly enough, the two Linux installations, which are from about the same time as the W7RC installation, still run flawlessly. Has anyone else seen any strangeness with the newer versions of VirtualBox and a fairly recent 9.0-CURRENT? --- Gary Jennejohn From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 20 18:44:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E00AE106566B for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 18:44:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de [217.11.53.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AAC38FC08 for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 18:44:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (pD954F089.dip.t-dialin.net [217.84.240.137]) by mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 29C378445EC; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 20:44:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from unknown (IO.Leidinger.net [192.168.2.103]) by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB3B1162E9; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 20:44:07 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 20:44:07 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Roman Divacky Message-ID: <20090920204407.0000383a@unknown> In-Reply-To: <20090920063017.GA12687@freebsd.org> References: <20090919223624.00004f42@unknown> <20090920063017.GA12687@freebsd.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2cvs15 (GTK+ 2.16.0; i586-pc-mingw32msvc) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EBL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-EBL-MailScanner-ID: 29C378445EC.142AB X-EBL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-EBL-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, spamhaus-ZEN, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-1.44, required 6, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44) X-EBL-MailScanner-From: alexander@leidinger.net X-EBL-MailScanner-Watermark: 1254077052.23555@wKWsofoPDsuPbQ9DOUvPcA X-EBL-Spam-Status: No Cc: Alexander Best , freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: compat.linux.osrelease behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 18:44:18 -0000 On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 08:30:17 +0200 Roman Divacky wrote: > On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 10:36:24PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:08:31 +0200 (CEST) Alexander Best > > wrote: > > > > > > > hi there, > > > > > > i have a question regarding the behavior of > > > compat.linux.osrelease. setting it to 2.4.2 sets linuxulator into > > > 2.4 kernel-emulation and 2.6.16 sets it into 2.6 kernel-emulation > > > right? > > > > Sort of. 2.6.x set's 2.6 mode, and everything else is 2.4 mode. But > > this is AFAIK only a semantic change of some functions. This does > > not disable syscalls which are in 2.6 but not in 2.4. > > > > > but what happens when compat.linux.osrelease gets set to a > > > different value? ports/Updating entry 20071101 e.g. advises skype > > > users to set compat.linux.osrelease to 2.4.20. does this trigger > > > 2.6 kernel-emulation because 2.4.20 > 2.4.2 or are there more > > > than two kernel-emulation layers inside the linuxulator?? > > > > It does not affect the kernel emulation. But the glibc will try to > > use new syscalls. > > actually it does change how the kernel emulation works. grep for > linux_use26() I don't find the place where the behavior is changed when 2.4.20 is set... I only see a change when it is set to 2.6.x. Bye, Alexander. From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 20 20:12:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34965106568B for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 20:12:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rdivacky@vlk.vlakno.cz) Received: from vlakno.cz (77-93-215-190.static.masterinter.net [77.93.215.190]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E24758FC08 for ; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 20:12:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD8EF9CB084; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 22:08:46 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at vlakno.cz Received: from vlakno.cz ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (lev.vlakno.cz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GULC6AFlb8-Q; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 22:08:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from vlk.vlakno.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by vlakno.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F8679CB0F9; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 22:08:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from rdivacky@localhost) by vlk.vlakno.cz (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n8KK8hOp036370; Sun, 20 Sep 2009 22:08:43 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rdivacky) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 22:08:43 +0200 From: Roman Divacky To: Alexander Leidinger Message-ID: <20090920200843.GA36192@freebsd.org> References: <20090919223624.00004f42@unknown> <20090920063017.GA12687@freebsd.org> <20090920204407.0000383a@unknown> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090920204407.0000383a@unknown> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Alexander Best , freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: compat.linux.osrelease behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2009 20:12:13 -0000 On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 08:44:07PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 08:30:17 +0200 Roman Divacky > wrote: > > > > On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 10:36:24PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: > > > On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:08:31 +0200 (CEST) Alexander Best > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > hi there, > > > > > > > > i have a question regarding the behavior of > > > > compat.linux.osrelease. setting it to 2.4.2 sets linuxulator into > > > > 2.4 kernel-emulation and 2.6.16 sets it into 2.6 kernel-emulation > > > > right? > > > > > > Sort of. 2.6.x set's 2.6 mode, and everything else is 2.4 mode. But > > > this is AFAIK only a semantic change of some functions. This does > > > not disable syscalls which are in 2.6 but not in 2.4. > > > > > > > but what happens when compat.linux.osrelease gets set to a > > > > different value? ports/Updating entry 20071101 e.g. advises skype > > > > users to set compat.linux.osrelease to 2.4.20. does this trigger > > > > 2.6 kernel-emulation because 2.4.20 > 2.4.2 or are there more > > > > than two kernel-emulation layers inside the linuxulator?? > > > > > > It does not affect the kernel emulation. But the glibc will try to > > > use new syscalls. > > > > actually it does change how the kernel emulation works. grep for > > linux_use26() > > I don't find the place where the behavior is changed when 2.4.20 is > set... I only see a change when it is set to 2.6.x. the thing with 2.4.20 is that red hat backported NPTL to 2.4.20 kernel. so the userland expects NTPL but we dont provide it. I dont think it's worth solving... the default is 2.6.16 and I dont see much reason why anyone would need 2.4.20... From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 21 04:27:42 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2C5E1065670; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 04:27:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A1338FC12; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 04:27:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (linimon@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8L4Rgkm088288; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 04:27:42 GMT (envelope-from linimon@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from linimon@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n8L4RgkS088284; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 04:27:42 GMT (envelope-from linimon) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 04:27:42 GMT Message-Id: <200909210427.n8L4RgkS088284@freefall.freebsd.org> To: linimon@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-i386@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org From: linimon@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/138944: [parallels] [regression] Parallels no longer works in FreeBSD 8 Beta X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 04:27:42 -0000 Old Synopsis: Cannot update to FreeBSD 8 Beta from FreeBSD 7 New Synopsis: [parallels] [regression] Parallels no longer works in FreeBSD 8 Beta Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-i386->freebsd-emulation Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Sep 21 04:26:08 UTC 2009 Responsible-Changed-Why: Make a guess and assign this to the emulation mailing list. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=138944 From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 21 09:25:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A612106566C for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:25:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from services.ipt.ru (services.ipt.ru [194.62.233.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6F0C8FC15 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:25:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [85.173.17.224] (helo=izar) by services.ipt.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1Mpf9J-0001uS-75; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:25:33 +0400 To: Roman Divacky References: <20090919223624.00004f42@unknown> <20090920063017.GA12687@freebsd.org> <20090920204407.0000383a@unknown> <20090920200843.GA36192@freebsd.org> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 13:27:31 +0400 In-Reply-To: <20090920200843.GA36192@freebsd.org> (Roman Divacky's message of "Sun\, 20 Sep 2009 22\:08\:43 +0200") Message-ID: <78325388@ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Alexander Leidinger , freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: compat.linux.osrelease behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 09:25:35 -0000 Roman Divacky writes: R> ... the default is 2.6.16 and I dont see much reason > why anyone would need 2.4.20... +1 -- WBR, bsam From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 21 11:06:53 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C9B8106568F for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:06:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 312848FC0C for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:06:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8LB6rsR030211 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:06:53 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n8LB6qj5030207 for freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:06:52 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:06:52 GMT Message-Id: <200909211106.n8LB6qj5030207@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 11:06:53 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o kern/138944 emulation [parallels] [regression] Parallels no longer works in o kern/138880 emulation [linux] munmap segfaults after linux_mmap2 stresstest o ports/137332 emulation add caution messages to some adobe products f ports/136321 emulation x11-toolkits/linux-pango: please update linux based po o ports/136229 emulation [linux] certain linux apps look for libraries using a o ports/135337 emulation [PATCH] emulators/linux_base-f10: incorrect bash usage o ports/135322 emulation Port graphics/linux_dri has incorrect packaging list c o kern/130724 emulation [linprocfs] [patch] cpuinfo in linprocfs is dated, cau o kern/129169 emulation [linux] [patch] Linux Emulation ENOTCONN error using n f ports/127018 emulation Linuxulator incapable of using FreeBSD's LDAP environm o kern/126232 emulation [linux] Linux ioctl TCGETS (0x5401) always fails o kern/97326 emulation [linux] file descriptor leakage in linux emulation o kern/73777 emulation [linux] [patch] linux emulation: root dir special hand a kern/72920 emulation [linux]: path "prefixing" is not done on unix domain s o kern/56451 emulation [linprocfs] /compat/linux/proc/cpuinfo gives wrong CPU o kern/41543 emulation [patch] [request] easier wine/w23 support o kern/39201 emulation [linux] [patch] ptrace(2) and rfork(RFLINUXTHPN) confu o kern/29698 emulation [linux] [patch] linux ipcs doesn'work o kern/21463 emulation [linux] Linux compatability mode should not allow setu o kern/11165 emulation [ibcs2] IBCS2 doesn't work correctly with PID_MAX 9999 20 problems total. From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 21 12:21:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8363C1065670; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:21:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexander@leidinger.net) Received: from mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de [217.11.53.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06B808FC0A; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:21:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outgoing.leidinger.net (pD9E2C3D0.dip.t-dialin.net [217.226.195.208]) by mail.ebusiness-leidinger.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2D267844822; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:21:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from webmail.leidinger.net (webmail.leidinger.net [192.168.1.102]) by outgoing.leidinger.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2913BEF0A; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:21:17 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=Leidinger.net; s=outgoing-alex; t=1253535677; bh=qvgKA7fbzxiE4rXJnVZa3GiI2WOsqVvpjGAeU61CV2o=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=WQPyWGH+dwwv1D6rweORSUbWg535IbZNZbiX9buPsJtZ9cJXpRZ5ULRef8AM60xCc z++SO2INeEzGubZlQbTXL8RWmEzx6oMgzNTkjfcjnnRXuDtrFgedW9e84uFiVas+Mg Uabrjk0k0I7yBEFQqy3hkaUvlbNgnIAznHbQZS38l5pUacS8Gu1BR8FIqVGGGURDup pfhkhN8TBczJ0E3cPLaynv/utdXMWZ6/KiKZqJNvRab6ForhcivpLwjV0AKV7FeQr5 WNE8wK/CHazskwbfBPNQMDYB+QmtYBPdqdVX1OWcDRW9/9D1LJaMFIdmahr65ld5Y4 AIs7uhi1N3h6Q== Received: (from www@localhost) by webmail.leidinger.net (8.14.3/8.13.8/Submit) id n8LCLHV5038118; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:21:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from Alexander@Leidinger.net) Received: from pslux.cec.eu.int (pslux.cec.eu.int [158.169.9.14]) by webmail.leidinger.net (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:21:16 +0200 Message-ID: <20090921142116.934965dwi9evrvok@webmail.leidinger.net> X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 14:21:16 +0200 From: Alexander Leidinger To: Roman Divacky References: <20090919223624.00004f42@unknown> <20090920063017.GA12687@freebsd.org> <20090920204407.0000383a@unknown> <20090920200843.GA36192@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20090920200843.GA36192@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 4.3.3 / FreeBSD-8.0 X-EBL-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-EBL-MailScanner-ID: 2D267844822.A2391 X-EBL-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-EBL-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, spamhaus-ZEN, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-1.439, required 6, autolearn=disabled, ALL_TRUSTED -1.44, DKIM_SIGNED 0.00) X-EBL-MailScanner-From: alexander@leidinger.net X-EBL-MailScanner-Watermark: 1254140482.87433@lTjUH9vGYJNO2ToP5IsHkQ X-EBL-Spam-Status: No Cc: Alexander Best , freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: compat.linux.osrelease behavior X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 12:21:28 -0000 Quoting Roman Divacky (from Sun, 20 Sep 2009 22:08:43 +0200): > On Sun, Sep 20, 2009 at 08:44:07PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: >> On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 08:30:17 +0200 Roman Divacky >> wrote: >> >> >> > On Sat, Sep 19, 2009 at 10:36:24PM +0200, Alexander Leidinger wrote: >> > > On Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:08:31 +0200 (CEST) Alexander Best >> > > wrote: >> > > >> > > >> > > > hi there, >> > > > >> > > > i have a question regarding the behavior of >> > > > compat.linux.osrelease. setting it to 2.4.2 sets linuxulator into >> > > > 2.4 kernel-emulation and 2.6.16 sets it into 2.6 kernel-emulation >> > > > right? >> > > >> > > Sort of. 2.6.x set's 2.6 mode, and everything else is 2.4 mode. But >> > > this is AFAIK only a semantic change of some functions. This does >> > > not disable syscalls which are in 2.6 but not in 2.4. >> > > >> > > > but what happens when compat.linux.osrelease gets set to a >> > > > different value? ports/Updating entry 20071101 e.g. advises skype >> > > > users to set compat.linux.osrelease to 2.4.20. does this trigger >> > > > 2.6 kernel-emulation because 2.4.20 > 2.4.2 or are there more >> > > > than two kernel-emulation layers inside the linuxulator?? >> > > >> > > It does not affect the kernel emulation. But the glibc will try to >> > > use new syscalls. >> > >> > actually it does change how the kernel emulation works. grep for >> > linux_use26() >> >> I don't find the place where the behavior is changed when 2.4.20 is >> set... I only see a change when it is set to 2.6.x. > > the thing with 2.4.20 is that red hat backported NPTL to 2.4.20 kernel. > so the userland expects NTPL but we dont provide it. I dont think it's > worth solving... the default is 2.6.16 and I dont see much reason > why anyone would need 2.4.20... I agree, but this was not the question of the initial post. So it seems we are back to my initial response, 2.4.20 does not change the emulation in the kernel, but it changes the behavior of glibc. Bye, Alexander. -- One man's constant is another man's variable. -- A. J. Perlis http://www.Leidinger.net Alexander @ Leidinger.net: PGP ID = B0063FE7 http://www.FreeBSD.org netchild @ FreeBSD.org : PGP ID = 72077137 From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 22 10:46:08 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A80091065697 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:46:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) Received: from mout7.freenet.de (mout7.freenet.de [IPv6:2001:748:100:40::2:9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 423FD8FC19 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:46:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [195.4.92.18] (helo=8.mx.freenet.de) by mout7.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.69 #92) id 1Mq2sp-0007AE-3A for emulation@freebsd.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:46:07 +0200 Received: from td960.t.pppool.de ([89.55.217.96]:34325 helo=ernst.jennejohn.org) by 8.mx.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.69 #94) id 1Mq2so-00047H-RF for emulation@freebsd.org; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:46:07 +0200 Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:46:06 +0200 From: Gary Jennejohn To: emulation@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090922124606.0a9aee4d@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <20090920191501.3d4d2c8a@ernst.jennejohn.org> References: <20090920191501.3d4d2c8a@ernst.jennejohn.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.16.2; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: VirtualBox/kernel broken? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gary.jennejohn@freenet.de List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 10:46:08 -0000 On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 19:15:01 +0200 Gary Jennejohn wrote: > So, I have a problem with VirtualBox and can't say whether it's a problem > with VirtualBox itself or something which has changed in the kernel. > > I'm running FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT Wed Sep 16 11:40:19 CEST 2009 amd64. > > I installed both the port and the latest stuff from svn. > > The problem is with an installation of Windows 7 RC which was working > fine with an older version of the port (can't say from when, though) > AND of the kernel. > > Today I decided to try the latest version of VirtualBox and the W7RC > fails upon booting with an internal VirtualBox error. > > Strangely enough, if I start W7RC in repair mode it happily runs to > completion, but then the boot fails with the above mentioned error. > > Booting from the ISO also fails. > > I have all kinds of log files from VirtualBox which I can't parse. > > Interestingly enough, the two Linux installations, which are from > about the same time as the W7RC installation, still run flawlessly. > > Has anyone else seen any strangeness with the newer versions of VirtualBox > and a fairly recent 9.0-CURRENT? > Since I never got any response to this, I'll relate what I've found out. If I turn off acceleration in Settings->System->Acceleration W7RC runs, although it's very slow. Something broke somewhere, but I can't say whether in VirtualBox or the kernel. --- Gary Jennejohn From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 22 18:46:55 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7077106566B for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:46:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scf@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.farley.org (mail.farley.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f0f:20:2::11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69C158FC08 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:46:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thor.farley.org (HPooka@thor.farley.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f0f:20:1::5]) by mail.farley.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8MIkskc082833 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:46:54 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from scf@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 13:46:54 -0500 (CDT) From: "Sean C. Farley" To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on mail.farley.org Cc: Subject: Panic with vboxnet drivers X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 18:46:55 -0000 While I have had no trouble with two systems running with the tap patch, I am experiencing some lockups when using the vboxnet* drivers. I have five witness logs (attached): 1. The first one appeared when I tried to run VirtualBox with vboxnetadp loaded via loader.conf. VirtualBox will not be able to find the VirtualBox network drivers this way, so I unloaded and loaded vboxnetadp from the command line for the following logs. 2. The next three logs are LOR's (sleepable after non-sleepable) concerning VirtualBox's "IPRT Fast Mutex Semaphore" which is an sx. I am not sure I am reading the backtrace correctly. It looks like the call to RTSemFastMutexRequest(), which calls sx_xlock(), is the effect. I just do not know where the cause, i.e., RTSemFastMutexRequest(), is being called. 3. The last log is a LOR, but it may not be related to VirtualBox. Does _end() represent a special function called after any function returns? The easiest way to induce a panic is to scp a large file into a VM and then start a download of a file over the same network device of the host that vboxnet0 is bridged. It usually takes a few seconds. This occurs on two different systems running 7-STABLE (r196739): 1. i386, em0, gmirror 2. amd64, em0, no gmirror Here is the only panic that ever made it to the disk. Most of the time it just locks the system. Unread portion of the kernel message buffer: Sleeping thread (tid 100048, pid 48) owns a non-sleepable lock panic: sleeping thread cpuid = 0 Sleeping thread (tid 100048, pid 48) owns a non-sleepable lock panic: sleeping thread cpuid = 0 Uptime: 27m12s Physical memory: 3306 MB Dumping 236 MB: 221 205 189 173 157 141 125 109 93 77 61 45 29 13 #0 doadump () at pcpu.h:196 #1 0xc057bf87 in boot (howto=260) at /usr/FreeBSD/RELENG_7/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:418 #2 0xc057c259 in panic (fmt=Variable "fmt" is not available.) at /usr/FreeBSD/RELENG_7/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:574 #3 0xc05b3a7e in propagate_priority (td=0xc71b8b40) at /usr/FreeBSD/RELENG_7/src/sys/kern/subr_turnstile.c:222 #4 0xc05b3b89 in turnstile_adjust (td=0xc7638b40, oldpri=128 '\200') at /usr/FreeBSD/RELENG_7/src/sys/kern/subr_turnstile.c:442 #5 0xc059d6fb in sched_prio (td=0xc7638b40, prio=76 'L') at /usr/FreeBSD/RELENG_7/src/sys/kern/sched_ule.c:1726 #6 0xc058444d in _sleep (ident=0xc7486870, lock=0x0, priority=76, wmesg=0xc09ab880 "m:destroy", timo=200) at /usr/FreeBSD/RELENG_7/src/sys/kern/kern_synch.c:219 #7 0xc09a5441 in g_mirror_destroy (sc=0xc7486800, how=1) at /usr/FreeBSD/RELENG_7/src/sys/modules/geom/geom_mirror/../../../geom/mirror/g_mirror.c:2975 #8 0xc09a57e7 in g_mirror_shutdown_pre_sync (arg=0xc09ad3e0, howto=260) at /usr/FreeBSD/RELENG_7/src/sys/modules/geom/geom_mirror/../../../geom/mirror/g_mirror.c:3235 #9 0xc057b9f3 in boot (howto=260) at /usr/FreeBSD/RELENG_7/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:296 #10 0xc057c259 in panic (fmt=Variable "fmt" is not available.) at /usr/FreeBSD/RELENG_7/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:574 #11 0xc05b3a7e in propagate_priority (td=0xc71b8b40) at /usr/FreeBSD/RELENG_7/src/sys/kern/subr_turnstile.c:222 #12 0xc05b4948 in turnstile_wait (ts=0xc763a4b0, owner=0xc71b8b40, queue=Variable "queue" is not available.) at /usr/FreeBSD/RELENG_7/src/sys/kern/subr_turnstile.c:740 #13 0xc057aa88 in _rw_wlock_hard (rw=0xc7a9f36c, tid=3345189696, file=0x0, line=0) at /usr/FreeBSD/RELENG_7/src/sys/kern/kern_rwlock.c:686 #14 0xc06aaadb in tcp_usr_rcvd (so=0xc7a16000, flags=0) at /usr/FreeBSD/RELENG_7/src/sys/netinet/tcp_usrreq.c:707 #15 0xc05d8f93 in soreceive_generic (so=0xc7a16000, psa=0xe9bafbe8, uio=0xe9bafbf4, mp0=0x0, controlp=0x0, flagsp=0xe9bafc78) at /usr/FreeBSD/RELENG_7/src/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c:1828 #16 0xc05d3788 in soreceive (so=0xc7a16000, psa=0xe9bafbe8, uio=0xe9bafbf4, mp0=0x0, controlp=0x0, flagsp=0xe9bafc78) at /usr/FreeBSD/RELENG_7/src/sys/kern/uipc_socket.c:2032 #17 0xc05da5a5 in kern_recvit (td=0xc7638b40, s=3, mp=0xe9bafc60, fromseg=UIO_USERSPACE, controlp=0x0) at /usr/FreeBSD/RELENG_7/src/sys/kern/uipc_syscalls.c:1002 #18 0xc05da7b1 in recvit (td=Variable "td" is not available.) at /usr/FreeBSD/RELENG_7/src/sys/kern/uipc_syscalls.c:1113 #19 0xc05da926 in recvfrom (td=0xc7638b40, uap=0xe9bafcfc) at /usr/FreeBSD/RELENG_7/src/sys/kern/uipc_syscalls.c:1157 #20 0xc07cb085 in syscall (frame=0xe9bafd38) at /usr/FreeBSD/RELENG_7/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:1094 #21 0xc07b0c80 in Xint0x80_syscall () at /usr/FreeBSD/RELENG_7/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:262 #22 0x00000033 in ?? () Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?) Here is the output from the sleeping thread: #0 sched_switch (td=0xc71b8b40, newtd=Variable "newtd" is not available.) at /usr/FreeBSD/RELENG_7/src/sys/kern/sched_ule.c:1944 #1 0xc0584046 in mi_switch (flags=Variable "flags" is not available.) at /usr/FreeBSD/RELENG_7/src/sys/kern/kern_synch.c:444 #2 0xc05b080b in sleepq_switch (wchan=Variable "wchan" is not available.) at /usr/FreeBSD/RELENG_7/src/sys/kern/subr_sleepqueue.c:497 #3 0xc05b0e56 in sleepq_wait (wchan=0xc7be02d4) at /usr/FreeBSD/RELENG_7/src/sys/kern/subr_sleepqueue.c:580 #4 0xc058388e in _sx_xlock_hard (sx=0xc7be02d4, tid=3340471104, opts=0, file=0xc0acb042 "/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902/src/VBox/Runtime/r0drv/freebsd/semfastmutex-r0drv-freebsd.c", line=103) at /usr/FreeBSD/RELENG_7/src/sys/kern/kern_sx.c:560 #5 0xc0583c28 in _sx_xlock (sx=0xc7be02d4, opts=0, file=0xc0acb042 "/usr/ports/emulators/virtualbox/work/virtualbox-3.0.51r22902/src/VBox/Runtime/r0drv/freebsd/semfastmutex-r0drv-freebsd.c", line=103) at sx.h:154 #6 0xc0ab8351 in RTSemFastMutexRequest () from /boot/modules/vboxdrv.ko #7 0xc7f3d82a in ?? () #8 0xc7be02d0 in ?? () #9 0xc85b6c00 in ?? () #10 0x00000000 in ?? () #11 0xc8338a90 in ?? () #12 0xc8338a90 in ?? () #13 0xc85b6c00 in ?? () #14 0xe788f6e4 in ?? () #15 0xc7ee10bb in ng_vboxnetflt_rcvdata () from /boot/modules/vboxnetflt.ko The thread itself is: 49 Thread 100048 (PID=48: em0 taskq) sched_switch (td=0xc71b8b40, newtd=Variable "newtd" is not available.) at /usr/FreeBSD/RELENG_7/src/sys/kern/sched_ule.c:1944 While em0 taskq is the thread, is it really the em driver's fault or vboxnetflt? Does the panic message mean that the priority was changed while holding a spinlock? Sean -- scf@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 22 22:12:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BDCB1065672 for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 22:12:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E91B08FC1F for ; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 22:12:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from park.js.berklix.net (p549A7A10.dip.t-dialin.net [84.154.122.16]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n8MLfi1Q008035; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 21:41:45 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by park.js.berklix.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n8MLfiIr052903; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 23:41:44 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8MLhWa8065001; Tue, 22 Sep 2009 23:43:37 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <200909222143.n8MLhWa8065001@fire.js.berklix.net> To: gary.jennejohn@freenet.de From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://www.berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://www.berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:46:06 +0200." <20090922124606.0a9aee4d@ernst.jennejohn.org> Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 23:43:32 +0200 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: VirtualBox/kernel broken? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 22:12:04 -0000 Gary Jennejohn wrote: > On Sun, 20 Sep 2009 19:15:01 +0200 > Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > > So, I have a problem with VirtualBox and can't say whether it's a problem > > with VirtualBox itself or something which has changed in the kernel. > > > > I'm running FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT Wed Sep 16 11:40:19 CEST 2009 amd64. > > > > I installed both the port and the latest stuff from svn. > > > > The problem is with an installation of Windows 7 RC which was working > > fine with an older version of the port (can't say from when, though) > > AND of the kernel. > > > > Today I decided to try the latest version of VirtualBox and the W7RC > > fails upon booting with an internal VirtualBox error. > > > > Strangely enough, if I start W7RC in repair mode it happily runs to > > completion, but then the boot fails with the above mentioned error. > > > > Booting from the ISO also fails. > > > > I have all kinds of log files from VirtualBox which I can't parse. > > > > Interestingly enough, the two Linux installations, which are from > > about the same time as the W7RC installation, still run flawlessly. > > > > Has anyone else seen any strangeness with the newer versions of VirtualBox > > and a fairly recent 9.0-CURRENT? > > > > Since I never got any response to this, I'll relate what I've found out. > > If I turn off acceleration in Settings->System->Acceleration W7RC runs, > although it's very slow. > > Something broke somewhere, but I can't say whether in VirtualBox or the > kernel. Hi Gary, cc list. I tried to see if I could cast light on the above, using my 7.2-RELEASE kernel, + current/ports/emulators/virtualbox sources as of yesterday, built yesterday. I did dd bs=2k of my genuine Toshiba XP cdrom, tried to install it, & got an error from Tosh/Mickeysoft "Wrong machine This software is designed for TOSHIBA Personal Computers" As suspected, the XP that Toshiba sold bundled with my laptop is a crippled version, looking for Toshiba hardware warts. I assume Virtualbox is providing a nice generic environment without Tosh warts. (The above both running Virtualbox as normal user & root, from a .iso file, I tried running VirtualBox from original cdrom in drive, but failed, likely my user error). I hope someone else can give you a more useful response. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey: BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Mail ASCII plain text not HTML & Base64. http://asciiribbon.org Virused Microsoft PCs cause spam. http://berklix.com/free/ From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 23 18:33:47 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E70471065672; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 18:33:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de) Received: from smtp.kn-bremen.de (gelbbaer.kn-bremen.de [78.46.108.116]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A71D78FC0C; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 18:33:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kn-bremen.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id 108421E0061B; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:33:45 +0200 (CEST) Received: from triton8.kn-bremen.de (noident@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by triton8.kn-bremen.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8NIWNNS002448; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:32:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nox@triton8.kn-bremen.de) Received: (from nox@localhost) by triton8.kn-bremen.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n8NIWNVw002447; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:32:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nox) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 20:32:23 +0200 (CEST) From: Juergen Lock Message-Id: <200909231832.n8NIWNVw002447@triton8.kn-bremen.de> To: scf@FreeBSD.org X-Newsgroups: local.list.freebsd.emulation In-Reply-To: Organization: home Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Panic with vboxnet drivers X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 18:33:47 -0000 In article you write: >While I have had no trouble with two systems running with the tap patch, >I am experiencing some lockups when using the vboxnet* drivers. > >I have five witness logs (attached): >1. The first one appeared when I tried to run VirtualBox with vboxnetadp > loaded via loader.conf. VirtualBox will not be able to find the > VirtualBox network drivers this way, so I unloaded and loaded > vboxnetadp from the command line for the following logs. >2. The next three logs are LOR's (sleepable after non-sleepable) > concerning VirtualBox's "IPRT Fast Mutex Semaphore" which is an sx. > I am not sure I am reading the backtrace correctly. It looks like > the call to RTSemFastMutexRequest(), which calls sx_xlock(), is the > effect. I just do not know where the cause, i.e., > RTSemFastMutexRequest(), is being called. >3. The last log is a LOR, but it may not be related to VirtualBox. >[...] It seems the attachments got stripped... Juergen From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 23 18:41:39 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ADAA106566B for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 18:41:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scf@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.farley.org (mail.farley.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f0f:20:2::11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C50408FC12 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 18:41:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thor.farley.org (HPooka@thor.farley.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f0f:20:1::5]) by mail.farley.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8NIfbTd039286; Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:41:37 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from scf@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:41:37 -0500 (CDT) From: "Sean C. Farley" To: Juergen Lock In-Reply-To: <200909231832.n8NIWNVw002447@triton8.kn-bremen.de> Message-ID: References: <200909231832.n8NIWNVw002447@triton8.kn-bremen.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=4.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,NO_RELAYS autolearn=ham version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on mail.farley.org Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Panic with vboxnet drivers X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 18:41:39 -0000 On Wed, 23 Sep 2009, Juergen Lock wrote: > In article you write: >> While I have had no trouble with two systems running with the tap >> patch, I am experiencing some lockups when using the vboxnet* >> drivers. >> >> I have five witness logs (attached): >> 1. The first one appeared when I tried to run VirtualBox with >> vboxnetadp loaded via loader.conf. VirtualBox will not be able to >> find the VirtualBox network drivers this way, so I unloaded and >> loaded vboxnetadp from the command line for the following logs. >> 2. The next three logs are LOR's (sleepable after non-sleepable) >> concerning VirtualBox's "IPRT Fast Mutex Semaphore" which is an >> sx. I am not sure I am reading the backtrace correctly. It looks >> like the call to RTSemFastMutexRequest(), which calls sx_xlock(), >> is the effect. I just do not know where the cause, i.e., >> RTSemFastMutexRequest(), is being called. >> 3. The last log is a LOR, but it may not be related to VirtualBox. >> [...] > > It seems the attachments got stripped... Oops. I think I forgot to attach them. :) Here they are now: http://people.freebsd.org/~scf/vb-witness.log Sean -- scf@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 24 21:19:18 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C24091065670 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:19:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57B0C8FC0C for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:19:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18877 invoked by uid 399); 24 Sep 2009 21:19:16 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO foreign.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 24 Sep 2009 21:19:16 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4ABBE24E.3090306@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:19:10 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090822) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Does vbox have support for cd-rom or usb in winxp guest? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:19:18 -0000 The 2 most recent versions of vbox have been stable enough for me to start using them for real work, so congrats to those working on the port! So naturally, now I want more. :) Specifically I'm curious about cd-rom and usb support. When I start the gui and go to settings for my existing winxp guest my cd-rom drive is not available on the spinner for "Host CD/DVD Drive." Is that expected? Is there something I need to do differently to make that available? I'm also curious about access to USB devices. I don't even see options for that, so is it just not possible? Thanks, Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 24 21:30:53 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D31551065670; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:30:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from mailgw.es.net (mail1.es.net [IPv6:2001:400:201:1::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8DB88FC1B; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:30:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [IPv6:2001:400:910::29]) by mailgw.es.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8OLUquS024920 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:30:52 -0700 Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (Tachyon Server) with ESMTP id 6BF031CC39; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:30:52 -0700 (PDT) To: Doug Barton In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:19:10 PDT." <4ABBE24E.3090306@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:30:52 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" Message-Id: <20090924213052.6BF031CC39@ptavv.es.net> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=1.12.8161:2.4.5, 1.2.40, 4.0.166 definitions=2009-09-24_19:2009-09-22, 2009-09-24, 2009-09-24 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=5.0.0-0908210000 definitions=main-0909240149 Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Does vbox have support for cd-rom or usb in winxp guest? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:30:53 -0000 > Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:19:10 -0700 > From: Doug Barton > Sender: owner-freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org > > The 2 most recent versions of vbox have been stable enough for me to > start using them for real work, so congrats to those working on the > port! So naturally, now I want more. :) > > Specifically I'm curious about cd-rom and usb support. When I start > the gui and go to settings for my existing winxp guest my cd-rom drive > is not available on the spinner for "Host CD/DVD Drive." Is that > expected? Is there something I need to do differently to make that > available? > > I'm also curious about access to USB devices. I don't even see options > for that, so is it just not possible? > > > Thanks, > > Doug > > -- > > This .signature sanitized for your protection > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-emulation > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-emulation-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Doug, I am NOT involved with VirtualBox porting, but I suggest that you see the VB wiki page . It is kept pretty current. It does have information on making the CD/DVD work. (Mostly protection issues.) It also lists the last two features not yet supported by the port...USB and OpenGL. :-( I really need USB, as well, as I need to sync my phone (Treo) regularly to our calendar. Other than the USB, everything seems to work great for a Windows 7 guest. I just need a bit more memory so I don't spend so much time paging. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751 From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 24 21:31:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 706CD106568D; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:31:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f187.google.com (mail-yw0-f187.google.com [209.85.211.187]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15C268FC14; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:31:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh17 with SMTP id 17so2452940ywh.3 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:31:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=o74RY/RcqxKrt6kC9iFLEjmwo+5MNMsID309/lg/XeA=; b=dewEajv0snAakEKBG7gf9m5M8e9FaSbsETyPkALYvxXmy8LCmyMzI+I+WNii0U7sPc 0lwBTQGkc/CvTqEjOVTOWuCzix63j5V9Lu1R9W2WSLACFeupy0g5kraiRBmY5ir36/x2 yy9R5k7dVSxzcYtDYP1DD8xx/9O4WFZKyuG3o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=iDoDC/ej38AuUhWoOQh7OhQhfH1PFnGdYd9MJ6efyZUkMgm/+zh+5UxxObhFUuq4xl tuNuEDt3/3//oHweF/ef4m/B7rltEqU3yRDrhT+gTH8d8BKeLXIKiEVdA+CAm1fivAME pJm9qYM/5cpXi+P7ht4X+ei6itX6HgjMpR5Pw= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.150.236.16 with SMTP id j16mr762491ybh.259.1253827882430; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:31:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4ABBE24E.3090306@FreeBSD.org> References: <4ABBE24E.3090306@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:31:22 -0500 Message-ID: <6201873e0909241431h4df17f6fv8c8a8b5f594503d2@mail.gmail.com> From: Adam Vande More To: Doug Barton Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does vbox have support for cd-rom or usb in winxp guest? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:31:23 -0000 On Thu, Sep 24, 2009 at 4:19 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > The 2 most recent versions of vbox have been stable enough for me to > start using them for real work, so congrats to those working on the > port! So naturally, now I want more. :) > > Specifically I'm curious about cd-rom and usb support. When I start > the gui and go to settings for my existing winxp guest my cd-rom drive > is not available on the spinner for "Host CD/DVD Drive." Is that > expected? Is there something I need to do differently to make that > available? > > I'm also curious about access to USB devices. I don't even see options > for that, so is it just not possible? > > > Thanks, > > Doug > I'm not sure, but I think atapicam is required for cdrom access. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 24 21:42:24 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A79AA1065670 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:42:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AFA58FC12 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:42:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 24798 invoked by uid 399); 24 Sep 2009 21:42:22 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO foreign.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 24 Sep 2009 21:42:22 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4ABBE7B8.6070205@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:42:16 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090822) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kevin Oberman References: <20090924213052.6BF031CC39@ptavv.es.net> In-Reply-To: <20090924213052.6BF031CC39@ptavv.es.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Does vbox have support for cd-rom or usb in winxp guest? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:42:24 -0000 Kevin Oberman wrote: > Doug, > > I am NOT involved with VirtualBox porting, but I suggest that you see > the VB wiki page . It is kept pretty > current. > > It does have information on making the CD/DVD work. Thanks! I'm trying to avoid running HAL so unless my needs become much greater I'll stick with mounting ISOs for now. > (Mostly protection > issues.) It also lists the last two features not yet supported by the > port...USB and OpenGL. :-( I really need USB, as well, as I need to > sync my phone (Treo) regularly to our calendar. Yeah, I'd like to be able to sync my iPhone. That's the last thing I know for sure I need at the moment. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 24 21:54:57 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71B7A106566B; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:54:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fli@shapeshifter.se) Received: from mx1.h3q.net (mx1.h3q.net [IPv6:2001:16d8:ffe5:1::f1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36E5C8FC22; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:54:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-auth.h3q.net (smtp-auth.h3q.net [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: hidden) by mx1.h3q.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C5DF733CC7 ; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:54:55 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4ABBEAAF.9020409@shapeshifter.se> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:54:55 +0200 From: Fredrik Lindberg User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090912) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton References: <4ABBE24E.3090306@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4ABBE24E.3090306@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Does vbox have support for cd-rom or usb in winxp guest? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 21:54:57 -0000 Doug Barton wrote: > > I'm also curious about access to USB devices. I don't even see options > for that, so is it just not possible? > The open source edition of VirtualBox doesn't include any USB support nor the virtual USB controller, it's a closed source component. Details at http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Editions Fredrik From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 24 23:50:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0DA91065676 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:50:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 725C28FC13 for ; Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:50:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31448 invoked by uid 399); 24 Sep 2009 23:50:43 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO foreign.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 24 Sep 2009 23:50:43 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4ABC05CD.6090108@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 16:50:37 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090822) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fredrik Lindberg References: <4ABBE24E.3090306@FreeBSD.org> <4ABBEAAF.9020409@shapeshifter.se> In-Reply-To: <4ABBEAAF.9020409@shapeshifter.se> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Does vbox have support for cd-rom or usb in winxp guest? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Sep 2009 23:50:49 -0000 Fredrik Lindberg wrote: > Doug Barton wrote: >> >> I'm also curious about access to USB devices. I don't even see options >> for that, so is it just not possible? >> > > The open source edition of VirtualBox doesn't include any USB support > nor the virtual USB controller, it's a closed source component. > > Details at http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Editions Wow, what a bad web site! :) Where would I go to buy the closed source version, and could I run it on FreeBSD if I did? Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 25 08:29:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 125021065670; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 08:29:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fli@shapeshifter.se) Received: from mx1.h3q.net (mx1.h3q.net [IPv6:2001:16d8:ffe5:1::f1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB8CB8FC1A; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 08:29:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp-auth.h3q.net (smtp-auth.h3q.net [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: hidden) by mx1.h3q.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DED4B33CC7 ; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 10:29:01 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4ABC7F49.2060809@shapeshifter.se> Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 10:28:57 +0200 From: Fredrik Lindberg User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090912) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Barton References: <4ABBE24E.3090306@FreeBSD.org> <4ABBEAAF.9020409@shapeshifter.se> <4ABC05CD.6090108@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4ABC05CD.6090108@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Does vbox have support for cd-rom or usb in winxp guest? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 08:29:04 -0000 Doug Barton wrote: > Fredrik Lindberg wrote: >> Doug Barton wrote: >>> I'm also curious about access to USB devices. I don't even see options >>> for that, so is it just not possible? >>> >> The open source edition of VirtualBox doesn't include any USB support >> nor the virtual USB controller, it's a closed source component. >> >> Details at http://www.virtualbox.org/wiki/Editions > > Wow, what a bad web site! :) Where would I go to buy the closed > source version, and could I run it on FreeBSD if I did? > The closed source version is free (as in beer) for personal use but as far as I know they don't have any binaries for FreeBSD. Fredrik From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 25 09:38:37 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DCEF106566B for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:38:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) Received: from mout3.freenet.de (mout3.freenet.de [IPv6:2001:748:100:40::2:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D71058FC1A for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:38:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [195.4.92.26] (helo=16.mx.freenet.de) by mout3.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.69 #92) id 1Mr7G7-0005vE-9q; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:38:35 +0200 Received: from tfb1f.t.pppool.de ([89.55.251.31]:19545 helo=ernst.jennejohn.org) by 16.mx.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.69 #94) id 1Mr7G7-0000tW-2H; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:38:35 +0200 Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:38:34 +0200 From: Gary Jennejohn To: "Kevin Oberman" Message-ID: <20090925113834.09dad3e2@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <20090924213052.6BF031CC39@ptavv.es.net> References: <4ABBE24E.3090306@FreeBSD.org> <20090924213052.6BF031CC39@ptavv.es.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.16.2; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Does vbox have support for cd-rom or usb in winxp guest? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gary.jennejohn@freenet.de List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:38:37 -0000 On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:30:52 -0700 "Kevin Oberman" wrote: > Other than the USB, everything seems to work great for a Windows 7 > guest. I just need a bit more memory so I don't spend so much time > paging. > This statement interests me because, as I've posted several times, I can't even start W7RC with acceleration turned on (running a recent 9-CURRENT). Everything worked with older versions of the kernel and port. What version of FreeBSD and of the port are you using? --- Gary Jennejohn From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 25 16:17:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DD631065670 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:17:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from mailgw.es.net (mail4.es.net [IPv6:2001:400:6000:6::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C373A8FC20 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:17:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [IPv6:2001:400:910::29]) by mailgw.es.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8PGHcFH022205 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:17:41 -0700 Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (Tachyon Server) with ESMTP id 403D41CC13; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:17:38 -0700 (PDT) To: gary.jennejohn@freenet.de In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:38:34 +0200." <20090925113834.09dad3e2@ernst.jennejohn.org> Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:17:38 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" Message-Id: <20090925161738.403D41CC13@ptavv.es.net> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=1.12.8161:2.4.5, 1.2.40, 4.0.166 definitions=2009-09-25_09:2009-09-22, 2009-09-25, 2009-09-25 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=5.0.0-0908210000 definitions=main-0909250048 Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Does vbox have support for cd-rom or usb in winxp guest? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:17:44 -0000 > Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:38:34 +0200 > From: Gary Jennejohn > > On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:30:52 -0700 > "Kevin Oberman" wrote: > > > Other than the USB, everything seems to work great for a Windows 7 > > guest. I just need a bit more memory so I don't spend so much time > > paging. > > > > This statement interests me because, as I've posted several times, I can't > even start W7RC with acceleration turned on (running a recent 9-CURRENT). > Everything worked with older versions of the kernel and port. > > What version of FreeBSD and of the port are you using? Yes, I have seen your reports and I don't see anything like it. I'm running FreeBSD 8.0-RC1 and have been using VB running Windows 7 Release (not RC) since 8.0-BETA1. I have used both NAT and bridged networking and both work fine for me. No problems encountered at all other than that memory utilization tends to sit at 85% or more and paging and swapping on the Windows system makes it very slow and makes running more than one app at a time impractical. W7 simply can't run well with 512 MB of memory. I ordered memory for my ThinkPad yesterday, so I hope that I'll have double the memory next week. If it would work for FreeBSD, I would be quite willing to buy a commercial version to get the USB to work! Of course, neither the VB nor the Sun Microsystems web sites provide any clue as to how to buy it, even if it could work. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751 From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 25 16:31:30 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A13D7106568B for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:31:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) Received: from mout0.freenet.de (mout0.freenet.de [IPv6:2001:748:100:40::2:2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 338878FC16 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:31:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [195.4.92.10] (helo=0.mx.freenet.de) by mout0.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.69 #92) id 1MrDhg-0006i4-U6; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:31:28 +0200 Received: from tce43.t.pppool.de ([89.55.206.67]:45272 helo=ernst.jennejohn.org) by 0.mx.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.69 #94) id 1MrDhg-0004xg-Gf; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:31:28 +0200 Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:31:26 +0200 From: Gary Jennejohn To: "Kevin Oberman" Message-ID: <20090925183126.361f54aa@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <20090925161738.403D41CC13@ptavv.es.net> References: <20090925113834.09dad3e2@ernst.jennejohn.org> <20090925161738.403D41CC13@ptavv.es.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.16.2; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Does vbox have support for cd-rom or usb in winxp guest? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gary.jennejohn@freenet.de List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:31:30 -0000 On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:17:38 -0700 "Kevin Oberman" wrote: > > Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:38:34 +0200 > > From: Gary Jennejohn > > > > On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:30:52 -0700 > > "Kevin Oberman" wrote: > > > > > Other than the USB, everything seems to work great for a Windows 7 > > > guest. I just need a bit more memory so I don't spend so much time > > > paging. > > > > > > > This statement interests me because, as I've posted several times, I can't > > even start W7RC with acceleration turned on (running a recent 9-CURRENT). > > Everything worked with older versions of the kernel and port. > > > > What version of FreeBSD and of the port are you using? > > Yes, I have seen your reports and I don't see anything like it. > > I'm running FreeBSD 8.0-RC1 and have been using VB running Windows 7 > Release (not RC) since 8.0-BETA1. > This sort of confirms my suspicion that something has changed in the 9-CURRENT kernel to break VirtualBox. It worked just fine until I installed a new kernel at the beginning of last week :( Hmm, you're running an Intel box? I run AMD64. Might also be a factor. > networking and both work fine for me. No problems encountered at all > other than that memory utilization tends to sit at 85% or more and > paging and swapping on the Windows system makes it very slow and makes > running more than one app at a time impractical. W7 simply can't run > well with 512 MB of memory. > > I ordered memory for my ThinkPad yesterday, so I hope that I'll have > double the memory next week. > More memory definitely helps. I allocated 1GB to W7RC and it runs OK with that. But then, I have 4GB in my box. --- Gary Jennejohn From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 25 16:46:02 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FDF31065670 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:46:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from oberman@es.net) Received: from mailgw.es.net (mail1.es.net [IPv6:2001:400:201:1::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4580F8FC23 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:46:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [IPv6:2001:400:910::29]) by mailgw.es.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8PGjwpf002420 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:46:01 -0700 Received: from ptavv.es.net (ptavv.es.net [127.0.0.1]) by ptavv.es.net (Tachyon Server) with ESMTP id 52BA41CC0E; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:45:57 -0700 (PDT) To: gary.jennejohn@freenet.de In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:31:26 +0200." <20090925183126.361f54aa@ernst.jennejohn.org> Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:45:57 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" Message-Id: <20090925164557.52BA41CC0E@ptavv.es.net> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=1.12.8161:2.4.5, 1.2.40, 4.0.166 definitions=2009-09-25_09:2009-09-22, 2009-09-25, 2009-09-25 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=5.0.0-0908210000 definitions=main-0909250051 Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Does vbox have support for cd-rom or usb in winxp guest? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:46:02 -0000 > Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:31:26 +0200 > From: Gary Jennejohn > > On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 09:17:38 -0700 > "Kevin Oberman" wrote: > > > > Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 11:38:34 +0200 > > > From: Gary Jennejohn > > > > > > On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 14:30:52 -0700 > > > "Kevin Oberman" wrote: > > > > > > > Other than the USB, everything seems to work great for a Windows 7 > > > > guest. I just need a bit more memory so I don't spend so much time > > > > paging. > > > > > > > > > > This statement interests me because, as I've posted several times, I can't > > > even start W7RC with acceleration turned on (running a recent 9-CURRENT). > > > Everything worked with older versions of the kernel and port. > > > > > > What version of FreeBSD and of the port are you using? > > > > Yes, I have seen your reports and I don't see anything like it. > > > > I'm running FreeBSD 8.0-RC1 and have been using VB running Windows 7 > > Release (not RC) since 8.0-BETA1. > > > > This sort of confirms my suspicion that something has changed in the > 9-CURRENT kernel to break VirtualBox. It worked just fine until I > installed a new kernel at the beginning of last week :( > > Hmm, you're running an Intel box? I run AMD64. Might also be a factor. Yes, it is a 4 year old 2 GHz Pentium-M, so AMD64 is not available. > > > networking and both work fine for me. No problems encountered at all > > other than that memory utilization tends to sit at 85% or more and > > paging and swapping on the Windows system makes it very slow and makes > > running more than one app at a time impractical. W7 simply can't run > > well with 512 MB of memory. > > > > I ordered memory for my ThinkPad yesterday, so I hope that I'll have > > double the memory next week. > > > > More memory definitely helps. I allocated 1GB to W7RC and it runs OK > with that. But then, I have 4GB in my box. Due to the Intel 915 chip, my system is restricted to 2 GB, but that will let me run a 1G guest. The VB is on a USB disk, too, which does not help performance, but lets me move the guest system from host to host which is proving very handy! -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 Key fingerprint:059B 2DDF 031C 9BA3 14A4 EADA 927D EBB3 987B 3751 From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 25 17:24:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07EDC1065676 for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:24:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E5248FC1A for ; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:24:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 26990 invoked by uid 399); 25 Sep 2009 17:24:05 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO foreign.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 25 Sep 2009 17:24:05 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4ABCFCAF.30807@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 10:23:59 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090822) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gary.jennejohn@freenet.de References: <20090925113834.09dad3e2@ernst.jennejohn.org> <20090925161738.403D41CC13@ptavv.es.net> <20090925183126.361f54aa@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <20090925183126.361f54aa@ernst.jennejohn.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Does vbox have support for cd-rom or usb in winxp guest? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:24:12 -0000 Gary Jennejohn wrote: > This sort of confirms my suspicion that something has changed in the > 9-CURRENT kernel to break VirtualBox. It worked just fine until I > installed a new kernel at the beginning of last week :( I'm using 9-current and I update just about every day, so it's not universal. Did you rebuild your virtualbox port after updating your kernel? And did you do a complete buildworld and installworld? Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 25 23:14:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 018B1106566C; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 23:14:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nox@jelal.kn-bremen.de) Received: from smtp.kn-bremen.de (gelbbaer.kn-bremen.de [78.46.108.116]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5EE88FC15; Fri, 25 Sep 2009 23:14:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kn-bremen.de (Postfix, from userid 10) id 41AE61E006D2; Sat, 26 Sep 2009 01:14:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from triton8.kn-bremen.de (noident@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by triton8.kn-bremen.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8PN9KZr049044; Sat, 26 Sep 2009 01:09:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nox@triton8.kn-bremen.de) Received: (from nox@localhost) by triton8.kn-bremen.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n8PN9Ksr049043; Sat, 26 Sep 2009 01:09:20 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from nox) From: Juergen Lock Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 01:09:20 +0200 To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20090925230920.GA46757@triton8.kn-bremen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Jung-uk Kim Subject: qemu 0.11.0 on FreeBSD - port update for testing X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Sep 2009 23:14:31 -0000 Hi! So qemu 0.11.0 is out, the first version off the new stable branch, and I've now made an update for (for the moment) the emulators/qemu-devel port, http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/qemu/qemu-devel-0.11.0.patch that could use some testing before I commit it as emulators/qemu, especially because its a new branch... I have added the serial emulation fix again (which has been committed to the stable branch now too but after 0.11.0 was tagged; the only other fix committed since then - MAX_OP_PER_INSTR - has already been in the FreeBSD ports since back when I first reported it - only that I used an even higher value now that I look, I'll lower it later.) I already noticed one thing tho: I have updated the pcap patch to (mostly) the code Jung-uk Kim sent me for the git snapshot, and now packets especially from the host seem to be received late i.e. I see ping times of ~1000ms and ssh'ing to the host is laggy too - maybe setting BIOCIMMEDIATE doesn't work properly anymore with the new code? (Btw the git snapshot is affected too, I just didn't notice before.) Enjoy, Juergen From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Sep 26 09:11:03 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 724C41065670; Sat, 26 Sep 2009 09:11:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) Received: from mout6.freenet.de (mout6.freenet.de [IPv6:2001:748:100:40::2:8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F6908FC08; Sat, 26 Sep 2009 09:11:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [195.4.92.23] (helo=13.mx.freenet.de) by mout6.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.69 #92) id 1MrTIz-0007uT-V3; Sat, 26 Sep 2009 11:11:01 +0200 Received: from td6c6.t.pppool.de ([89.55.214.198]:58586 helo=ernst.jennejohn.org) by 13.mx.freenet.de with esmtpa (ID gary.jennejohn@freenet.de) (port 25) (Exim 4.69 #94) id 1MrTIz-0008IG-OM; Sat, 26 Sep 2009 11:11:01 +0200 Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 11:11:01 +0200 From: Gary Jennejohn To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20090926111101.0176d5b4@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <4ABCFCAF.30807@FreeBSD.org> References: <20090925113834.09dad3e2@ernst.jennejohn.org> <20090925161738.403D41CC13@ptavv.es.net> <20090925183126.361f54aa@ernst.jennejohn.org> <4ABCFCAF.30807@FreeBSD.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.2 (GTK+ 2.16.2; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Does vbox have support for cd-rom or usb in winxp guest? X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: gary.jennejohn@freenet.de List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 26 Sep 2009 09:11:03 -0000 On Fri, 25 Sep 2009 10:23:59 -0700 Doug Barton wrote: > Gary Jennejohn wrote: > > This sort of confirms my suspicion that something has changed in the > > 9-CURRENT kernel to break VirtualBox. It worked just fine until I > > installed a new kernel at the beginning of last week :( > > I'm using 9-current and I update just about every day, so it's not > universal. > Acceleration works with Linux, but not with Windows 7 RC. So, it's not really universal for me either. But it _did_ work with W7RC about 2 weeks ago. > Did you rebuild your virtualbox port after updating your kernel? And > did you do a complete buildworld and installworld? > Yes and yes. I've tried both the port and svn for VirtualBox. --- Gary Jennejohn