From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 14 11:07:09 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 272451065698 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:07:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 155708FC28 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:07:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n8EB786J072488 for ; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:07:08 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n8EB78f8072484 for freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:07:08 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:07:08 GMT Message-Id: <200909141107.n8EB78f8072484@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 11:07:09 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- f sparc/127051 sparc64 [hme] hme interfaces "pause" with the message "device o sparc/119244 sparc64 X11Forwarding to X11 server on sparc crashes Xorg o sparc/119240 sparc64 top has WCPU over 100% on UP system s sparc/119239 sparc64 gdb coredumps on sparc64 o sparc/113556 sparc64 [panic] trap: memory address not aligned; Rebooting... f sparc/108732 sparc64 ping(8) reports 14 digit time on sparc64 s sparc/107087 sparc64 [hang] system is hung during boot from CD o sparc/105048 sparc64 [trm] trm(4) panics on sparc64 o sparc/104428 sparc64 [nullfs] nullfs panics on E4500 (but not E420) o sparc/80890 sparc64 [panic] kmem_malloc(73728): kmem_map too small running o sparc/80410 sparc64 [netgraph] netgraph is causing crash with mpd on sparc o sparc/71729 sparc64 printf in kernel thread causes panic on SPARC 12 problems total. From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 16 20:29:59 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BD7B106566C for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:29:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rjohanne@piper.hamline.edu) Received: from wnk.hamline.edu (wnk2.hamline.edu [138.192.246.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26BF98FC08 for ; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:29:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wnk.hamline.edu (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by wnk.hamline.edu (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id n8GKSR3U001724; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:28:27 -0500 Received: from localhost (rjohanne@localhost) by wnk.hamline.edu (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id n8GKSPHL001719; Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:28:27 -0500 Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 15:28:25 -0500 (CDT) From: R J X-X-Sender: rjohanne@wnk To: Marius Strobl In-Reply-To: <20090909184504.GD57060@alchemy.franken.de> Message-ID: References: <20090906182156.GA66161@alchemy.franken.de> <20090909184504.GD57060@alchemy.franken.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sata pci cards in ultra 60 or blade 1000 (Update) X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:29:59 -0000 Hi Marius, I've been using the patched driver and have moved more than 500 gigs of data on the disk drive attached to the ata-marvell controller. Can you incorporate your patch into the 8.0 BETA and 7.X stable? It seems a very stable, well-performing driver. It has worked flawlessly during the moves of enormous data backup and forth between the built in fibre-channel drives and the ata-marvell attached Hitachi drive. I wish I could say the same thing regarding the Sil3512. I still haven't been able to go any where with that. Thanks, Robert On Wed, 9 Sep 2009, Marius Strobl wrote: > On Tue, Sep 08, 2009 at 07:30:53PM -0500, R J wrote: >> Marius, >> >> I would like to say that thanks for fixing the ata-marvell driver for the >> SuperMicro Sata card on sparc64, atleast the blade 1000. Your patch has >> enabled the card to detect the disk drive and complete booting. Not only >> that, I was able to go all the way and create a new partition on the disk, >> newfs it, and mount it. I was able to copy 1.6gigs of data onto the >> partition, and was able to copy data from the partition to another >> directory within the same partition at a tune of about 40MB/s. >> >> Before that patch, the system was not able to complete booting. >> >> Out of curiosity, ofcourse, what does the patch do? Does it basically >> disable 64-bit and dma for the driver on sparc64? > > It does no such things, it just fixes some sloppy programming > (see my last email for a description of the problems) which > caused the driver to only have a chance of working on x86 but > AFAICT not on any of the other architectures supported by > FreeBSD. > >> This is a PCI-X 133mhz >> card. It would be a dream to get half the band-width as it is in a 66mhz >> pci slot. >> >> Thanks, Robert. >> >> NOTE: >> >> Here's a brief output from stock iostat: note the numbers for ad0. >> > > I admit that I have no experience with "benchmarking" disk > I/O with iostat(8), however checking with my machines > suggests that 40MB/s actually is an excellent result for > copying data from a disk to itself, I don't get anywhere > near that rate, not even on x86 with SATA300 gear. > > Marius > > reason=bad sender (\.de) > > From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 09:30:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87CB4106566B for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:30:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matpockuh@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f210.google.com (mail-fx0-f210.google.com [209.85.220.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22FAB8FC18 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:30:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm6 with SMTP id 6so3877349fxm.43 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 02:30:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=9MAtbbo+5o+StOTp+WMv/3Cd/tOCMfeeFmvkYXUs44I=; b=hhM77nQjYsKItz1Da24fT+nqYNTcFxHPsIgYOclyf1A9G1OezWrasOQ9iDfGVIOQwe 9iWASk5FKIPOSzVxiFt1+HVKncM8aO8zaXRpCN4UachxfFctHO7l1izfwq8ts6gmwzto jv//2gc48SJn5vhf1wY5u+J74NWFU1m6oSC7g= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=H/MmqzMgTEPNZLqQalbCN6uWzCgLHe0Ga0a95xppJr46DMiIBzO8cZzMWaIpe3nt2A GHqPoQ2L239X7HJpKvgSQSQvbKmqVTxPxUcldMU9XXOx4kpfhAWkWUSaP0gI5cDSvrXk glGR8qzygNnWYtQhPVzQeyLOSNKYNn/JZM7Wc= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.4.208 with SMTP id 16mr3290075fas.69.1253178032686; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 02:00:32 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 13:00:32 +0400 Message-ID: <3979a4b0909170200x754ea8c5l495e300b2a7a5113@mail.gmail.com> From: KOT MATPOCKuH To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Is it posible to run FreeBSD/sparc64 on SunFire V215? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 09:30:56 -0000 Hello! Is it possible to run FreeBSD/sparc64 on SunFire V215? This system is similar to SunFire V210/V240/V125, but have PCI-X and SAS disks. I'm tried to boot 8.0-BETA4, but it hangs after "jumping to kernel entry": {1} ok boot net Boot device: /pci@1e,600000/pci@0/pci@9/pci@0/network@4 File and args: 100 Mbps FDX Link up Requesting Internet Address for 0:14:4f:a2:ef:2c Requesting Internet Address for 0:14:4f:a2:ef:2c Consoles: Open Firmware console Booting with sun4u support. FreeBSD/sparc64 bootstrap loader, Revision 1.0 (root@araz.cse.buffalo.edu, Sun Sep 6 10:07:26 UTC 2009) bootpath="/pci@1e,600000/pci@0/pci@9/pci@0/network@4" boot: ethernet address: 00:14:4f:a2:ef:2c 100 Mbps FDX Link up Loading /boot/defaults/loader.conf /boot/kernel/kernel data=0x9eb048+0x215da8 syms=[0x8+0xaca58+0x8+0x9e05e] / Hit [Enter] to boot immediately, or any other key for command prompt. Booting [/boot/kernel/kernel]... jumping to kernel entry at 0xc0088000. As I know, OpenBSD 4.5 works on this platform, and I successfuly booted kernel. Why FreeBSD isn't ported to v215? -- MATPOCKuH From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 10:20:09 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 886AA10656A5 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:20:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (lefty.soaustin.net [66.135.55.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D5918FC4D for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:20:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id 377888C088; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:03:06 -0500 (CDT) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 05:03:06 -0500 From: Mark Linimon To: KOT MATPOCKuH Message-ID: <20090917100306.GB27695@lonesome.com> References: <3979a4b0909170200x754ea8c5l495e300b2a7a5113@mail.gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3979a4b0909170200x754ea8c5l495e300b2a7a5113@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is it posible to run FreeBSD/sparc64 on SunFire V215? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 10:20:09 -0000 On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 01:00:32PM +0400, KOT MATPOCKuH wrote: > Is it possible to run FreeBSD/sparc64 on SunFire V215? Looking at the list of dmesgs, I don't see anything for V215. You may be the first person to try it :-) http://wiki.freebsd.org/FreeBSD/sparc64/dmesgs mcl From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 17:23:33 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 216511065672 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:23:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ardelean@ww.uni-erlangen.de) Received: from servww6.ww.uni-erlangen.de (servww6.ww.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.238.13]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D06DA8FC1B for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:23:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by servww6.ww.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix, from userid 512) id 34AA862004; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:23:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by servww6.ww.uni-erlangen.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id F04C762002; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:23:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 19:23:28 +0200 (CEST) From: Gheorghe Ardelean To: Marius Strobl In-Reply-To: <20090826205905.GG94142@alchemy.franken.de> Message-ID: References: <20090817205340.GA75477@alchemy.franken.de> <20090817215612.GB75477@alchemy.franken.de> <20090818192748.GA6585@alchemy.franken.de> <20090819161410.GA19351@alchemy.franken.de> <4A8DC0DF.4040701@networkz.ch> <4A8EDE72.6040703@networkz.ch> <20090821193740.GA66639@alchemy.franken.de> <20090826205905.GG94142@alchemy.franken.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LNX 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Audio on Sunblade 100 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 17:23:33 -0000 Hi Marius, On Wed, 26 Aug 2009, Marius Strobl wrote: <...> > Unfortunately, I'm currently out of ideas what could be > the reason for the problem Christian is seeing. Given that > what I have works fine on 2 of 3 Blade 100 and my Blade > 1500, I'll commit it once I had a chance to verify it > doesn't break i386 though. It would be great however if > you could try a slightly updated version of the patch at > http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/t4dwave_M5451_32-bit.diff > (MD5 hash: 7aaee2bfeab57c21ab23c98cf1c67f23) with one > of your Blade 100. Tested and it works ok! Best regards, Gheorghe. From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 17 22:45:58 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D24B10656BA for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:45:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (alchemy.franken.de [194.94.249.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 130D78FC20 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:45:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/ALCHEMY.FRANKEN.DE) with ESMTP id n8HMjuVW042243; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:45:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n8HMjuYn042242; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:45:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marius) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:45:56 +0200 From: Marius Strobl To: KOT MATPOCKuH Message-ID: <20090917224556.GA41908@alchemy.franken.de> References: <3979a4b0909170200x754ea8c5l495e300b2a7a5113@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3979a4b0909170200x754ea8c5l495e300b2a7a5113@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is it posible to run FreeBSD/sparc64 on SunFire V215? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2009 22:45:58 -0000 On Thu, Sep 17, 2009 at 01:00:32PM +0400, KOT MATPOCKuH wrote: > Hello! > > Is it possible to run FreeBSD/sparc64 on SunFire V215? > This system is similar to SunFire V210/V240/V125, but have PCI-X and SAS disks. The main difference is that V215 are based on the 'Fire' JBus to PCI-Express bridges which the mainline FreeBSD doesn't have a driver for so far. > > I'm tried to boot 8.0-BETA4, but it hangs after "jumping to kernel entry": > <...> > > As I know, OpenBSD 4.5 works on this platform, and I successfuly booted kernel. > Why FreeBSD isn't ported to v215? > It's not like V215 smell bad or something but adding support for additional sparc64 machines typically always requires a developer with the necessary knowledge, time and interest to have access to that hardware. I recently started working on support for V215 and I at least can already netboot the machine (which actually is UP): http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/v215.txt Things still missing are at least ata(4) (which as-is just causes a panic when compiled in) and MSI support. Marius From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 06:29:45 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88FDF106568F for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:29:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matpockuh@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f227.google.com (mail-bw0-f227.google.com [209.85.218.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15F608FC0C for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:29:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz27 with SMTP id 27so472309bwz.43 for ; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 23:29:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=sX3YtDHIpJyw4VrA38UWY2kD4HyU9c12M5Z4lkHcqxE=; b=IZeyk7ll0IqJkS17epgKQ5B5VCALx2J8q+Sno8xjulK0zHlQHzzsNUaMBaWPBgpXjO YZGmb8S8MGfwYY+Hl7uQKLQYWqrgndC0+FSBkrf236AAu4zeqKG2ZySRvECfycbagATL DDLPuY+abrZyVIou4A1hrUvl5O/h/q0qgw2Ic= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=whNXkuzGMr2DNOyAVJZDJBgRh/0biNxSwH8EBlTT5TvJVwocxUf2Mp583vYAgJ+uCF sDF6r/XxZFrin1SFJA5BMoW+CmI/NbzUP68bp/VqC6Ep/kQLQ1bVP5zUMkwI6hz2tpzD x/KlC6muj+A8bxp4bmoJCSDEtHooYsdZAXPMQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.73.20 with SMTP id o20mr298472faj.71.1253255383903; Thu, 17 Sep 2009 23:29:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20090917224556.GA41908@alchemy.franken.de> References: <3979a4b0909170200x754ea8c5l495e300b2a7a5113@mail.gmail.com> <20090917224556.GA41908@alchemy.franken.de> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:29:43 +0400 Message-ID: <3979a4b0909172329q3a113942xfcd71394a98fee19@mail.gmail.com> From: KOT MATPOCKuH To: Marius Strobl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is it posible to run FreeBSD/sparc64 on SunFire V215? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 06:29:45 -0000 2009/9/18 Marius Strobl : > The main difference is that V215 are based on the 'Fire' > JBus to PCI-Express bridges which the mainline FreeBSD > doesn't have a driver for so far. Why is not possible to port this driver from openbsd? > http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/v215.txt Omg. I will try to repeat this :) > Things still missing are at least ata(4) (which as-is just > causes a panic when compiled in) It's not a problem to me, I have no ata(pi) devices on this system. > and MSI support. What from this follows? -- MATPOCKuH From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 10:23:51 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05C67106568D for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:23:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matpockuh@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f227.google.com (mail-bw0-f227.google.com [209.85.218.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86E488FC21 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:23:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz27 with SMTP id 27so567372bwz.43 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:23:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=tzrtVX8wj6T7qbJmf27ewjP6M0RLUsl62xUBL7iRk9w=; b=ec5keVXY3/jlqlC7rln+gGDgSrum+Vzj6MufR1NT896fROh9fhkcpix06iwWJ6e7qh 8Zc7zdYs83nrGUVM7ScgHM2fMnonEEf1y2eI5LKAij86OiuEcgOGE/+sO92dllypZ+T+ wacgMHTaS0B32LScHdLvVvQVZfMy8mh/tRBVY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=e7eoaO+Lo2Gb5QrPGjJWJqhIRbNWo6VR81d0ZSL7I2GThngt4Wljd7ioBz2FCcnb73 0ProiJxNRqyjQgdQZ43mEeAyOl7y4j97DQRIq5KgLVXV+yRb17TXBpHLTs/9Bpti7HZI PbqVdc4PN1zEc+xygHwvKZuwiHGVdc3gFGadM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.81.65 with SMTP id w1mr339166fak.46.1253269429453; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 03:23:49 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3979a4b0909172329q3a113942xfcd71394a98fee19@mail.gmail.com> References: <3979a4b0909170200x754ea8c5l495e300b2a7a5113@mail.gmail.com> <20090917224556.GA41908@alchemy.franken.de> <3979a4b0909172329q3a113942xfcd71394a98fee19@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:23:49 +0400 Message-ID: <3979a4b0909180323i207e6b55nff53a90ca323410f@mail.gmail.com> From: KOT MATPOCKuH To: Marius Strobl Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is it posible to run FreeBSD/sparc64 on SunFire V215? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:23:51 -0000 Hello! >> http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/v215.txt > Omg. I will try to repeat this :) I sup'ed to today CURRENT and compiled GENERIC kernel without ata, firewire and ipv6 support, but system again hangs after: OK boot -sh jumping to kernel entry at 0xc0080000. And... Why on my system I see "jumping...", but your system says "Booting [/boot/kernel/kernel]..." ? What I should do for success kernel start? :) PS. Why net boot is too slow? Loading process occupies ~15 minutes from start to last message. -- MATPOCKuH From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 12:44:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DA351065672 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:44:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (alchemy.franken.de [194.94.249.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C47F28FC17 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:44:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/ALCHEMY.FRANKEN.DE) with ESMTP id n8ICiNI7057819; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:44:25 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n8ICiNct057818; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:44:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marius) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 14:44:23 +0200 From: Marius Strobl To: R J Message-ID: <20090918124423.GP57060@alchemy.franken.de> References: <20090906182156.GA66161@alchemy.franken.de> <20090909184504.GD57060@alchemy.franken.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sata pci cards in ultra 60 or blade 1000 (Update) X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 12:44:28 -0000 On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 03:28:25PM -0500, R J wrote: > Hi Marius, > I've been using the patched driver and have moved more than 500 gigs of > data on the disk drive attached to the ata-marvell controller. > > Can you incorporate your patch into the 8.0 BETA and 7.X stable? > > It seems a very stable, well-performing driver. It has worked flawlessly > during the moves of enormous data backup and forth between the built in > fibre-channel drives and the ata-marvell attached Hitachi drive. I've updated the patch at http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/ata-marvell.c.diff slighlty based on feedback I got during review. Could you please give the new version (which has an MD5 hash of a56305fef5edb1d1510373b7e063aaab) a sanity check? Some basic transfer should be sufficient to verify it still works. If no new problem arises I'll commit the patch to head, stable/8 and stable/7. > > I wish I could say the same thing regarding the Sil3512. I still haven't > been able to go any where with that. AFAICT the "old" ata-siliconimage(4) suffers from the same bugs as ata-marvell(4) does, i.e. isn't endian clean and misses DMA synchronisation besides 64-bit DMA being broken, but isn't as straight forward to fix as ata-marvell(4) is. The new siis(4) doesn't have these bugs though, so I'd expect it to work fine. Have you talked to mav@freebsd.org regarding siis(4)? Marius From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Sep 18 13:14:18 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4F941065670 for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:14:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (alchemy.franken.de [194.94.249.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 373088FC1A for ; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:14:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/ALCHEMY.FRANKEN.DE) with ESMTP id n8IDEG2M058008; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:14:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id n8IDEGse058007; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:14:16 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from marius) Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 15:14:16 +0200 From: Marius Strobl To: KOT MATPOCKuH Message-ID: <20090918131416.GQ57060@alchemy.franken.de> References: <3979a4b0909170200x754ea8c5l495e300b2a7a5113@mail.gmail.com> <20090917224556.GA41908@alchemy.franken.de> <3979a4b0909172329q3a113942xfcd71394a98fee19@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3979a4b0909172329q3a113942xfcd71394a98fee19@mail.gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is it posible to run FreeBSD/sparc64 on SunFire V215? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:14:18 -0000 On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 10:29:43AM +0400, KOT MATPOCKuH wrote: > 2009/9/18 Marius Strobl : > > > The main difference is that V215 are based on the 'Fire' > > JBus to PCI-Express bridges which the mainline FreeBSD > > doesn't have a driver for so far. > Why is not possible to port this driver from openbsd? Nobody said it would be impossible to port it, actually that wouldn't make much sense though as their driver lacks stuff and has bugs in the Fire-specific parts and the MD and MI frameworks are incomparible anyway. > > > and MSI support. > What from this follows? Suboptimal performance as the on-board PCI devices share INTx interrupt lines (which up to V215 actually was rather uncommon for sun4u machines). On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 02:23:49PM +0400, KOT MATPOCKuH wrote: > Hello! > > >> http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/v215.txt > > Omg. I will try to repeat this :) > I sup'ed to today CURRENT and compiled GENERIC kernel without ata, > firewire and ipv6 support, but system again hangs after: > OK boot -sh > jumping to kernel entry at 0xc0080000. > > And... Why on my system I see "jumping...", but your system says > "Booting [/boot/kernel/kernel]..." ? > > What I should do for success kernel start? :) Like I said, mainline FreeBSD doesn't support V215 so far. If you like you can give the following patch a try: http://people.freebsd.org/~marius/fire.diff It requires head r197164 or later. > > PS. Why net boot is too slow? Loading process occupies ~15 minutes > from start to last message. I don't know and it works fine here, you'd need to analyze the network traffic in order to get an idea which side is the culprit. IIRC I've seen similar effects when not using the full speed of the network interface of a sun4u machine, i.e. for example a Gigabit Ethernet interface with a Fast Ethernet switch, given that the loader relies on the firmware to provide support for the NIC there isn't much that can be done about that. Marius