From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 14 11:07:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E9971065696 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:07:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CEB68FC12 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:07:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nBEB745c076071 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:07:04 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nBEB73vW076069 for freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:07:03 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:07:03 GMT Message-Id: <200912141107.nBEB73vW076069@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 11:07:04 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- s sparc/139134 sparc64 kernel output corruption f sparc/127051 sparc64 [hme] hme interfaces "pause" with the message "device o sparc/119244 sparc64 X11Forwarding to X11 server on sparc crashes Xorg o sparc/119240 sparc64 top has WCPU over 100% on UP system s sparc/119239 sparc64 gdb coredumps on sparc64 o sparc/113556 sparc64 [panic] trap: memory address not aligned; Rebooting... f sparc/108732 sparc64 ping(8) reports 14 digit time on sparc64 s sparc/107087 sparc64 [hang] system is hung during boot from CD o sparc/105048 sparc64 [trm] trm(4) panics on sparc64 o sparc/104428 sparc64 [nullfs] nullfs panics on E4500 (but not E420) o sparc/80890 sparc64 [panic] kmem_malloc(73728): kmem_map too small running o sparc/80410 sparc64 [netgraph] netgraph is causing crash with mpd on sparc o sparc/71729 sparc64 printf in kernel thread causes panic on SPARC 13 problems total. From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 14 17:04:16 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C7241065670; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:04:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 387BA8FC0A; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:04:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.63]) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NKEL9-0005Br-QE; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:04:15 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by isis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1NKEL9-0007iq-9V; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:04:07 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nBEH476U087337; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:04:07 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nBEH47mv087336; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:04:07 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:04:06 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org, gecko@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20091214170406.GA87328@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Spam-Score: -1.5 X-Spam-Level: - Cc: Subject: port www/libxul broken on sparc64, but builds even on ia64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 17:04:16 -0000 Port www/libxul is marked as broken on sparc64. HOwever, it builds even on ia64! Could anybody comment on why this port is broken for sparc64? many thanks anton -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 14 18:58:51 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9919A1065670 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 18:58:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xcllnt@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout025.mac.com (asmtpout025.mac.com [17.148.16.100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 859998FC08 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 18:58:51 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from ariccio-t43.jnpr.net (natint3.juniper.net [66.129.224.36]) by asmtp025.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0KUN00KDPLXRRT30@asmtp025.mac.com>; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 09:58:41 -0800 (PST) From: Marcel Moolenaar In-reply-to: <20091214170406.GA87328@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 09:58:39 -0800 Message-id: References: <20091214170406.GA87328@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> To: Anton Shterenlikht X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) Cc: gecko@freebsd.org, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: port www/libxul broken on sparc64, but builds even on ia64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 18:58:51 -0000 On Dec 14, 2009, at 9:04 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > Port www/libxul is marked as broken on sparc64. > HOwever, it builds even on ia64! > Could anybody comment on why this port is broken for sparc64? Anton, Can you remove the marker from the Makefile and just build it. Let us know how it fails if it fails. Remember that most ports committers don't have access to non PC hardware (or don't have easy access to it), so they do things blind. Once a port fails to build on an architecture and no one helps out to fix it, they can only mark the port as broken. FYI, -- Marcel Moolenaar xcllnt@mac.com From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 14 20:13:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB3A21065784 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:13:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from raven.customer.vol.cz (raven.customer.vol.cz [195.250.144.108]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 593CA8FC18 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:13:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.23] (r2bb217.net.upc.cz [62.245.117.217]) (authenticated bits=0) by raven.customer.vol.cz (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nBEJk30q038169; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:46:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) From: Pav Lucistnik To: Anton Shterenlikht In-Reply-To: <20091214170406.GA87328@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20091214170406.GA87328@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-ZI+1G/siqbhj+Imn8XGN" Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:46:03 +0100 Message-ID: <1260819963.52651.4.camel@hood.oook.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.28.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on 195.250.144.108 X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: raven.customer.vol.cz; Sender-ip: 62.245.117.217; Sender-helo: [192.168.0.23]; ) Cc: gecko@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ia64@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: port www/libxul broken on sparc64, but builds even on ia64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pav@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:13:14 -0000 --=-ZI+1G/siqbhj+Imn8XGN Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Anton Shterenlikht p=ED=B9e v po 14. 12. 2009 v 17:04 +0000: > Port www/libxul is marked as broken on sparc64. > HOwever, it builds even on ia64! > Could anybody comment on why this port is broken for sparc64? Here is the relevant log http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/sparc64-errorlogs/e.7.20090622032229= /libxul-1.9.0.10.log.bz2 --=20 Pav Lucistnik On real UNIX, /usr/bin/more prints -More-. --=-ZI+1G/siqbhj+Imn8XGN Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Toto je =?UTF-8?Q?digit=C3=A1ln=C4=9B?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8D=C3=A1st?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAksmlfoACgkQntdYP8FOsoK53QCguuvdsUgF+v3t69t95/xymbzj rBsAoKNgnFXxcmfd2aCdTxcweFWoL9z7 =7ap8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-ZI+1G/siqbhj+Imn8XGN-- From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 14 20:42:23 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 545061065693 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:42:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (alchemy.franken.de [194.94.249.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8E188FC18 for ; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:42:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/ALCHEMY.FRANKEN.DE) with ESMTP id nBEKgG0J079409; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:42:16 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nBEKgGDr079408; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:42:16 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius) Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:42:16 +0100 From: Marius Strobl To: Anton Shterenlikht Message-ID: <20091214204216.GA79355@alchemy.franken.de> References: <20091214170406.GA87328@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091214170406.GA87328@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: gecko@freebsd.org, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: port www/libxul broken on sparc64, but builds even on ia64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 20:42:23 -0000 On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 05:04:06PM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > Port www/libxul is marked as broken on sparc64. > HOwever, it builds even on ia64! > Could anybody comment on why this port is broken for sparc64? > See the follwing mail for a possible fix: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-sparc64/2009-November/006688.html Marius From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 14 21:01:44 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FD30106566B; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:01:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andreast-list@fgznet.ch) Received: from smtp.fgznet.ch (mail.fgznet.ch [81.92.96.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB9878FC1A; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:01:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from deuterium.andreas.nets (dhclient-91-190-8-131.flashcable.ch [91.190.8.131]) by smtp.fgznet.ch (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit_SMTPAUTH) with ESMTP id nBEKdfIA069043; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:39:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from andreast-list@fgznet.ch) Message-ID: <4B26A28D.7080801@fgznet.ch> Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:39:41 +0100 From: Andreas Tobler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091204 Thunderbird/3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Marcel Moolenaar , Anton Shterenlikht References: <20091214170406.GA87328@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 81.92.96.47 Cc: gecko@freebsd.org, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: port www/libxul broken on sparc64, but builds even on ia64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 21:01:44 -0000 On 14.12.09 18:58, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > On Dec 14, 2009, at 9:04 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > >> Port www/libxul is marked as broken on sparc64. >> HOwever, it builds even on ia64! >> Could anybody comment on why this port is broken for sparc64? > > Anton, > > Can you remove the marker from the Makefile and just build it. > Let us know how it fails if it fails. > > Remember that most ports committers don't have access to non > PC hardware (or don't have easy access to it), so they do > things blind. Once a port fails to build on an architecture > and no one helps out to fix it, they can only mark the port > as broken. I think I fixed this for the upcoming libxul. See here: https://trillian.chruetertee.ch/freebsd-gecko/wiki/TODO If you need a backport for the current libxul, 1.9.0.15, to sparc64, let me know. I would not be unhappy if you can wait for the new version. But if you have a speaking reason, I might find some slots :) Regards, Andreas From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 14 22:14:15 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BE281065670; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:14:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 441498FC16; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:14:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.93]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NKJB7-0002df-Nd; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:14:14 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by seis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1NKJB6-0004KI-Po; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:14:05 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nBEME4fY001985; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:14:04 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nBEME4mm001984; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:14:04 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:14:04 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Andreas Tobler Message-ID: <20091214221404.GB1953@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20091214170406.GA87328@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <4B26A28D.7080801@fgznet.ch> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B26A28D.7080801@fgznet.ch> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Spam-Score: -4.5 X-Spam-Level: ---- Cc: gecko@freebsd.org, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: port www/libxul broken on sparc64, but builds even on ia64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 22:14:15 -0000 On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 09:39:41PM +0100, Andreas Tobler wrote: > On 14.12.09 18:58, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > > > On Dec 14, 2009, at 9:04 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > > >> Port www/libxul is marked as broken on sparc64. > >> HOwever, it builds even on ia64! > >> Could anybody comment on why this port is broken for sparc64? > > > > Anton, > > > > Can you remove the marker from the Makefile and just build it. > > Let us know how it fails if it fails. > > > > Remember that most ports committers don't have access to non > > PC hardware (or don't have easy access to it), so they do > > things blind. Once a port fails to build on an architecture > > and no one helps out to fix it, they can only mark the port > > as broken. > > I think I fixed this for the upcoming libxul. See here: > https://trillian.chruetertee.ch/freebsd-gecko/wiki/TODO > > If you need a backport for the current libxul, 1.9.0.15, to sparc64, let > me know. I would not be unhappy if you can wait for the new version. > But if you have a speaking reason, I might find some slots :) excellent! many thanks for your hard work! -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 15 08:11:53 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D4181065676 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:11:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) Received: from misty.eyesbeyond.com (gerbercreations.com [71.39.140.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D57548FC13 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:11:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from misty.eyesbeyond.com (localhost.eyesbeyond.com [127.0.0.1]) by misty.eyesbeyond.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nBF7XCcl044981; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:33:13 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) Received: (from glewis@localhost) by misty.eyesbeyond.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nBF7XC5u044980; Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:33:12 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from glewis@eyesbeyond.com) X-Authentication-Warning: misty.eyesbeyond.com: glewis set sender to glewis@eyesbeyond.com using -f Date: Mon, 14 Dec 2009 23:33:12 -0800 From: Greg Lewis To: freebsd-java@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20091215073312.GA44797@misty.eyesbeyond.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Subject: Java on FreeBSD/sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 08:11:53 -0000 It's slow and I'm not particularly confident of how well it works on SMP. But if you're feeling adventurous and have FreeBSD/sparc64 8.0 and a yen to use Java then you might be interested in trying it out. http://people.freebsd.org/~glewis/openjdk7-freebsd-8.0-sparc64.tar.gz Note that this isn't a package, its just a tarball based on the BSD port of OpenJDK 7. If you were particuarly keen you could install Mercurial with the forest extension, hg fclone http://hg.openjdk.java.net/bsd-port/bsd-port/ and see if you could use it as a bootstrap to port HotSpot so it was faster. Sorry, I don't think I have the bandwidth to get this going on 7.x right now. If you'd like to I can outline roughly what I did. There will eventually be an openjdk7 port that will make this easier. -- Greg Lewis Email : glewis@eyesbeyond.com Eyes Beyond Web : http://www.eyesbeyond.com Information Technology FreeBSD : glewis@FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 15 09:21:14 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F7C0106566B; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:21:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCB208FC08; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:21:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.63]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NKTae-0000Yv-H0; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:21:12 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by isis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1NKTad-0007jD-Lu; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:21:08 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nBF9L70M020638; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:21:07 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nBF9L7HC020637; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:21:07 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:21:07 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Marius Strobl Message-ID: <20091215092107.GA20625@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20091214170406.GA87328@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091214204216.GA79355@alchemy.franken.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091214204216.GA79355@alchemy.franken.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Spam-Score: -4.4 X-Spam-Level: ---- Cc: gecko@freebsd.org, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: port www/libxul broken on sparc64, but builds even on ia64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:21:14 -0000 On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 09:42:16PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: > On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 05:04:06PM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > Port www/libxul is marked as broken on sparc64. > > HOwever, it builds even on ia64! > > Could anybody comment on why this port is broken for sparc64? > > > > See the follwing mail for a possible fix: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-sparc64/2009-November/006688.html yes, this patch seems to work. I've built libxul-1.9.0.15 on 9.0 many thanks anton -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 15 14:52:04 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74286106568B for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:52:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33A568FC16 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:52:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.93]) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NKYkp-00039y-CY for freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:52:02 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by seis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1NKYko-0007Ut-LT for freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:51:59 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nBFEpwAh021714 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:51:58 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nBFEpwsH021713 for freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:51:58 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:51:58 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20091215145158.GA21703@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Spam-Score: -4.5 X-Spam-Level: ---- Subject: options GEOM_PART_VTOC8 in GENERIC? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 14:52:04 -0000 Why in the sparc64 GENERIC there are these two lines: options GEOM_PART_GPT # GUID Partition Tables. options GEOM_LABEL # Provides labelization but not GEOM_PART_VTOC8? Is GEOM_LABEL really necessary, ir GEOM_PART_ is included? many thanks -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 15 16:26:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 808241065670; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:26:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EB398FC4B; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:26:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.93]) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NKaDq-0007nF-Ng; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:26:05 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by seis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1NKaDp-0001nV-Vg; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:26:02 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nBFGQ1fx022018; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:26:01 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nBFGQ1T9022017; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:26:01 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:26:01 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: gnome@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20091215162601.GA22008@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Spam-Score: -4.5 X-Spam-Level: ---- Cc: Subject: port devel/gobject-introspection fails to build on sparc X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 16:26:06 -0000 on FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT sparc64 port devel/gobject-introspection fails to build: Making all in gir gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/devel/gobject-introspection/work/gobject-introspection-0.6.6/gir' ../tools/g-ir-compiler --includedir=. GLib-2.0.gir -o GLib-2.0.typelib gmake[2]: *** [GLib-2.0.typelib] Illegal instruction: 4 (core dumped) gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/devel/gobject-introspection/work/gobject-introspection-0.6.6/gir' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 Any advice? many thanks anton -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 15 17:43:42 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C2991065676 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:43:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xcllnt@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout025.mac.com (asmtpout025.mac.com [17.148.16.100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3947E8FC14 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:43:42 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from macbook-pro.jnpr.net (natint3.juniper.net [66.129.224.36]) by asmtp025.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0KUP00BJVFWN8X60@asmtp025.mac.com> for freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:43:36 -0800 (PST) From: Marcel Moolenaar In-reply-to: <20091215145158.GA21703@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 09:43:36 -0800 Message-id: <74484FD0-8801-4B37-8740-47FF0446459B@mac.com> References: <20091215145158.GA21703@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> To: Anton Shterenlikht X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1077) Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: options GEOM_PART_VTOC8 in GENERIC? X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 17:43:42 -0000 On Dec 15, 2009, at 6:51 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > Why in the sparc64 GENERIC there are these two lines: > > options GEOM_PART_GPT # GUID Partition Tables. > options GEOM_LABEL # Provides labelization > > but not GEOM_PART_VTOC8? Default options that are always present are in sparc64/conf/DEFAULT. You'll find GEOM_PART_VTOC8 there. (this is also where GEOM_PART_GPT lives on ia64 :-) FYI, -- Marcel Moolenaar xcllnt@mac.com From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 15 22:13:13 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4446D1065672 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 22:13:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from simon.griffiths@tenenbaum.co.uk) Received: from mail.tenenbaum.co.uk (87-194-142-21.bethere.co.uk [87.194.142.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0022D8FC15 for ; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 22:13:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ion (unknown [192.168.1.16]) by mail.tenenbaum.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 840C433C3C; Tue, 15 Dec 2009 22:13:11 +0000 (GMT) From: "Simon Griffiths" To: "'Anton Shterenlikht'" References: <20091214170406.GA87328@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <4B26A28D.7080801@fgznet.ch> <20091214221404.GB1953@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <20091214221404.GB1953@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 22:13:12 -0000 Message-ID: <008d01ca7dd3$ca6182c0$5f248840$@griffiths@tenenbaum.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 thread-index: Acp9Cs5urbCbgXWZQdC96m2yAkzMUwAyFbTw Content-Language: en-gb Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: RE: port www/libxul broken on sparc64, but builds even on ia64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Dec 2009 22:13:13 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > sparc64@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Anton Shterenlikht > Sent: 14 December 2009 22:14 > To: Andreas Tobler > Cc: gecko@freebsd.org; freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org; freebsd- > ports@freebsd.org; freebsd-ia64@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: port www/libxul broken on sparc64, but builds even on ia64 [snip] Apologies, the patch provided by Beat worked like a charm here. Unexpected failure + borked email backup locally caused me to lose how and where I got the fix. It was my intention to let the list know the outcome and thank Beat personally but due to my email problems this didn't happen. So thank you Beat for the patch and help personally afterwards and I can confirm the above patch worked locally here at the time. Cheers, Si. From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 18 12:38:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AB0D106566C; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 12:38:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bel@orel.ru) Received: from relay.orel.ru (relay.orel.ru [95.107.48.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 807178FC08; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 12:38:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bel.localdomain (aid.ct.orel.ru [95.107.50.26]) (authenticated bits=0) by relay.orel.ru (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nBICHeLn074556 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:17:43 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from bel@orel.ru) Message-ID: <4B2B72E4.4060808@orel.ru> Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:17:40 +0300 From: Andrew Belashov Organization: ORIS User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091204) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Anton Shterenlikht References: <20091215162601.GA22008@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <20091215162601.GA22008@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------000209010901090904060504" X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV version 0.94.2, clamav-milter version 0.94.2 on relay.orel.ru X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Zombi-Check: on netra2.orel.ru Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: port devel/gobject-introspection fails to build on sparc X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 12:38:07 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------000209010901090904060504 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi, Anton! Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > on FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT sparc64 > port devel/gobject-introspection fails to build: > > > Making all in gir > gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/devel/gobject-introspection/work/gobject-introspection-0.6.6/gir' > ../tools/g-ir-compiler --includedir=. GLib-2.0.gir -o GLib-2.0.typelib > gmake[2]: *** [GLib-2.0.typelib] Illegal instruction: 4 (core dumped) > gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/devel/gobject-introspection/work/gobject-introspection-0.6.6/gir' > gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > > Any advice? > > many thanks > anton > Try the attached patch on own risk. With Best Regards, Andrew Belashov. --------------000209010901090904060504 Content-Type: text/plain; name="patch-zz-bel" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline; filename="patch-zz-bel" --- girepository/girnode.c.orig 2009-07-09 21:20:46.000000000 +0400 +++ girepository/girnode.c 2009-12-09 16:12:24.000000000 +0300 @@ -2288,7 +2288,8 @@ break; case GI_TYPE_TAG_DOUBLE: blob->size = sizeof (gdouble); - *(gdouble*)&data[blob->offset] = (gdouble) parse_float_value (constant->value); + gdouble tmp = parse_float_value (constant->value); + memcpy (&data[blob->offset], &tmp, blob->size); break; case GI_TYPE_TAG_UTF8: case GI_TYPE_TAG_FILENAME: --------------000209010901090904060504-- From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 18 13:36:42 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1CE0106566B for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:36:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 883038FC1C for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:36:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.63]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NLd0W-00000L-CQ; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:36:40 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by isis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1NLd0V-00019D-PD; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:36:36 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nBIDaZQH089173; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:36:35 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nBIDaYVv089172; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:36:34 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:36:34 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Marius Strobl Message-ID: <20091218133634.GA89155@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20091201165752.GA12095@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091201215130.GA64974@alchemy.franken.de> <20091202124137.GA20168@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091202125915.GA20276@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091202192134.GA6562@alchemy.franken.de> <20091203131609.GA86854@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091203141711.GA43641@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091206161815.GA70140@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091207155713.GF6562@alchemy.franken.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091207155713.GF6562@alchemy.franken.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Spam-Score: -1.5 X-Spam-Level: - Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Solved: Re: trouble installing to sun blade 1500 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:36:42 -0000 On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 04:57:13PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: > > > > If I can get nowhere with this card, any advice for > > a card I could buy for Sun Blade 1500 (red or silver)? > > Sun PGX64 would be a good choice as they even allow to > use accelerated X with decent resolution (which is > unlikely to ever work with most of the XVR cards as > Sun didn't open source their drivers nor release the > necessary documentation). Marius, thank you. I bought on of those (15 pounds, ebay) and it seems to work ok in the text mode. I haven't yet built X successfully, still some errors in devel/gobject-intospection Could you also recommend a wireless network card for blade 1500? many thanks anton -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 18 13:41:07 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1838B106566B; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:41:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C59298FC21; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:41:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.63]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NLd4m-0000Ey-7U; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:41:04 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by isis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1NLd4l-0001AI-9N; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:40:59 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nBIDexB3089244; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:40:59 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nBIDewV0089243; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:40:58 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:40:58 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Andrew Belashov Message-ID: <20091218134058.GA89230@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20091215162601.GA22008@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <4B2B72E4.4060808@orel.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4B2B72E4.4060808@orel.ru> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Spam-Score: -1.5 X-Spam-Level: - Cc: gnome@freebsd.org, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: port devel/gobject-introspection fails to build on sparc X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 13:41:07 -0000 On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 03:17:40PM +0300, Andrew Belashov wrote: > Hi, Anton! > > Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > on FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT sparc64 > > port devel/gobject-introspection fails to build: > > > > > > Making all in gir > > gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/devel/gobject-introspection/work/gobject-introspection-0.6.6/gir' > > ../tools/g-ir-compiler --includedir=. GLib-2.0.gir -o GLib-2.0.typelib > > gmake[2]: *** [GLib-2.0.typelib] Illegal instruction: 4 (core dumped) > > gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/devel/gobject-introspection/work/gobject-introspection-0.6.6/gir' > > gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 > > > > Any advice? > > > > many thanks > > anton > > > > Try the attached patch on own risk. > > With Best Regards, > Andrew Belashov. > --- girepository/girnode.c.orig 2009-07-09 21:20:46.000000000 +0400 > +++ girepository/girnode.c 2009-12-09 16:12:24.000000000 +0300 > @@ -2288,7 +2288,8 @@ > break; > case GI_TYPE_TAG_DOUBLE: > blob->size = sizeof (gdouble); > - *(gdouble*)&data[blob->offset] = (gdouble) parse_float_value (constant->value); > + gdouble tmp = parse_float_value (constant->value); > + memcpy (&data[blob->offset], &tmp, blob->size); > break; > case GI_TYPE_TAG_UTF8: > case GI_TYPE_TAG_FILENAME: many thanks. But now fails here: env LPATH=.libs env PYTHONPATH=../..:../..:$PYTHONPATH UNINSTALLED_INTROSPECTIO N_SRCDIR=../.. UNINSTALLED_INTROSPECTION_BUILDDIR=../.. ../../tools/g-ir-scanner -v --add-include-path=../../gir --add-include-path=. \ --include=GObject-2.0 \ --libtool="/bin/sh /usr/local/bin/libtool" \ --program=./barapp \ --namespace=BarApp \ --strip-prefix=Bar \ --nsversion=1.0 \ --pkg gobject-2.0 \ ./barapp.c ./barapp.h \ --output BarApp-1.0.gir ../../tools/g-ir-compiler --includedir=. --includedir=../../gir BarApp-1.0.gir - o BarApp-1.0.typelib ../../tools/g-ir-generate --includedir=. --includedir=../../gir annotation-1.0.t ypelib -o annotation-1.0.tgir ../../tools/g-ir-generate --includedir=. --includedir=../../gir drawable-1.0.typ elib -o drawable-1.0.tgir ../../tools/g-ir-generate --includedir=. --includedir=../../gir foo-1.0.typelib -o foo-1.0.tgir ** ERROR:ginfo.c:337:g_base_info_get_name: code should not be reached gmake[3]: *** [foo-1.0.tgir] Abort trap: 6 (core dumped) gmake[3]: *** Deleting file `foo-1.0.tgir' gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/devel/gobject-introspection/work/gobject -introspection-0.6.6/tests/scanner' gmake[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 18 18:42:28 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1CE3106568D for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 18:42:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F128FC1B for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 18:42:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.63]) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NLhmP-0005Yr-PE for freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 18:42:27 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by isis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1NLhmO-0002kI-V0 for freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 18:42:21 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nBIIgKpM054098 for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 18:42:20 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nBIIgK7T054097 for freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 18:42:20 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 18:42:20 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20091218184220.GA54077@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Spam-Score: -1.5 X-Spam-Level: - Subject: burncd error on blade 1500 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 18:42:28 -0000 on 9.0 current # burncd -t -f /dev/acd0 data ./trydata fixate burncd: ioctl(CDRIOCINITTRACK): Input/output error # I've hw.ata.atapi_dma=0 in /boot/loader.conf Please advise many thanks anton -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 18 19:55:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A3F1065670 for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:55:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74E5A8FC12 for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:55:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.63]) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NLiux-0007bT-G1; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:55:18 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by isis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1NLiuw-00033I-Il; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:55:15 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nBIJtEV0064252; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:55:14 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nBIJtEvL064251; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:55:14 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:55:14 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Anton Shterenlikht Message-ID: <20091218195514.GA64224@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20091218184220.GA54077@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20091218184220.GA54077@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Spam-Score: -2.1 X-Spam-Level: -- Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: and cdrecord [WAS: burncd error on blade 1500] X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 19:55:19 -0000 On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 06:42:20PM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > on 9.0 current > > # burncd -t -f /dev/acd0 data ./trydata fixate > burncd: ioctl(CDRIOCINITTRACK): Input/output error > # > > I've hw.ata.atapi_dma=0 in /boot/loader.conf I also tried cdrecord: # cdrecord -v -dummy dev=1,0,0 ./z.iso cdrecord: No write mode specified. cdrecord: Asuming -tao mode. cdrecord: Future versions of cdrecord may have different drive dependent default s. cdrecord: Continuing in 5 seconds... Cdrecord-Clone 2.01 (sparc64-unknown-freebsd9.0) Copyright (C) 1995-2004 Jörg Sc hilling TOC Type: 1 = CD-ROM scsidev: '1,0,0' scsibus: 1 target: 0 lun: 0 cdrecord: Error 0. Cannot open SCSI driver. cdrecord: For possible targets try 'cdrecord -scanbus'. cdrecord: For possible transport specifiers try 'cdrecord dev=help'. # camcontrol devlist -v scbus0 on ata0 bus 0: <> at scbus0 target -1 lun -1 () scbus1 on ata1 bus 0: at scbus1 target 0 lun 0 () <> at scbus1 target -1 lun -1 () scbus-1 on xpt0 bus 0: <> at scbus-1 target -1 lun -1 (xpt0) # I've got these devices in the kernet config file: device ata device atadisk # ATA disk drives device atapicd # ATAPI CDROM drives device atapicam device auxio # auxiliary I/O device device cd device da # Direct Access (disks) device md # Memory "disks" device sbus device sc device scbus # SCSI bus (required for SCSI) What else am I missing? many thanks -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 19 12:56:19 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71E111065696 for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 12:56:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (alchemy.franken.de [194.94.249.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0EEA8FC0C for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 12:56:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/ALCHEMY.FRANKEN.DE) with ESMTP id nBJCuEQF054380; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:56:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nBJCuEcw054379; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:56:14 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:56:14 +0100 From: Marius Strobl To: Anton Shterenlikht Message-ID: <20091219125614.GV74529@alchemy.franken.de> References: <20091201165752.GA12095@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091201215130.GA64974@alchemy.franken.de> <20091202124137.GA20168@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091202125915.GA20276@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091202192134.GA6562@alchemy.franken.de> <20091203131609.GA86854@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091203141711.GA43641@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091206161815.GA70140@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091207155713.GF6562@alchemy.franken.de> <20091218133634.GA89155@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091218133634.GA89155@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Solved: Re: trouble installing to sun blade 1500 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 12:56:19 -0000 On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 01:36:34PM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 04:57:13PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: > > > > > > If I can get nowhere with this card, any advice for > > > a card I could buy for Sun Blade 1500 (red or silver)? > > > > Sun PGX64 would be a good choice as they even allow to > > use accelerated X with decent resolution (which is > > unlikely to ever work with most of the XVR cards as > > Sun didn't open source their drivers nor release the > > necessary documentation). > > Marius, thank you. I bought on of those (15 pounds, ebay) > and it seems to work ok in the text mode. > I haven't yet built X successfully, still some errors > in devel/gobject-intospection You'll likely want to use a more lightweight window manager than GNOME like for example windowmaker on a Blade 1500 anyway. > > Could you also recommend a wireless network card > for blade 1500? Some time ago ath(4) was fixed to work on sparc64 but I'm not aware of its current state. Marius From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 19 13:06:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BEE1106568F for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:06:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (alchemy.franken.de [194.94.249.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF7368FC15 for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:06:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/ALCHEMY.FRANKEN.DE) with ESMTP id nBJD6UYM054494; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 14:06:30 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nBJD6U5n054493; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 14:06:30 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 14:06:30 +0100 From: Marius Strobl To: Anton Shterenlikht Message-ID: <20091219130630.GA54383@alchemy.franken.de> References: <20091218184220.GA54077@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091218195514.GA64224@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20091218195514.GA64224@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: and cdrecord [WAS: burncd error on blade 1500] X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 13:06:35 -0000 On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 07:55:14PM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 06:42:20PM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > on 9.0 current > > > > # burncd -t -f /dev/acd0 data ./trydata fixate > > burncd: ioctl(CDRIOCINITTRACK): Input/output error > > # > > > > I've hw.ata.atapi_dma=0 in /boot/loader.conf > > I also tried cdrecord: > > # cdrecord -v -dummy dev=1,0,0 ./z.iso > cdrecord: No write mode specified. > cdrecord: Asuming -tao mode. > cdrecord: Future versions of cdrecord may have different drive dependent default > s. > cdrecord: Continuing in 5 seconds... > Cdrecord-Clone 2.01 (sparc64-unknown-freebsd9.0) Copyright (C) 1995-2004 Jörg Sc > hilling > TOC Type: 1 = CD-ROM > scsidev: '1,0,0' > scsibus: 1 target: 0 lun: 0 > cdrecord: Error 0. Cannot open SCSI driver. > cdrecord: For possible targets try 'cdrecord -scanbus'. > cdrecord: For possible transport specifiers try 'cdrecord dev=help'. > > # camcontrol devlist -v > scbus0 on ata0 bus 0: > <> at scbus0 target -1 lun -1 () > scbus1 on ata1 bus 0: > at scbus1 target 0 lun 0 () > <> at scbus1 target -1 lun -1 () > scbus-1 on xpt0 bus 0: > <> at scbus-1 target -1 lun -1 (xpt0) > # > At least for reading atapicam(4) works on sparc64 and cdrecord is also known to work for writing CDs with SCSI writers on sparc64, I currently don't have hardware to test whether it's also possible to write CDs with ATAPI writers using cdrecord on sparc64 though. Given that atapicam(4) works for reading it's unlikely that there are bugs preventing writing, I think it's way more likely that your drive is one of those incapable of simulating writes or it denies writing in PIO mode. Marius From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 19 18:20:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 419821065672 for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 18:20:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED5CC8FC1F for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 18:20:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.63]) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NM3uR-0006kP-Cr; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 18:20:10 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by isis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1NM3uP-0001wl-7C; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 18:20:06 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nBJIK5WR097882; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 18:20:05 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nBJIK4wx097877; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 18:20:04 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 18:20:04 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Marius Strobl Message-ID: <20091219182004.GA80336@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20091201215130.GA64974@alchemy.franken.de> <20091202124137.GA20168@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091202125915.GA20276@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091202192134.GA6562@alchemy.franken.de> <20091203131609.GA86854@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091203141711.GA43641@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091206161815.GA70140@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091207155713.GF6562@alchemy.franken.de> <20091218133634.GA89155@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091219125614.GV74529@alchemy.franken.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091219125614.GV74529@alchemy.franken.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Spam-Score: -1.5 X-Spam-Level: - Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Solved: Re: trouble installing to sun blade 1500 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 18:20:12 -0000 On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 01:56:14PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 01:36:34PM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 04:57:13PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: > > > > > > > > If I can get nowhere with this card, any advice for > > > > a card I could buy for Sun Blade 1500 (red or silver)? > > > > > > Sun PGX64 would be a good choice as they even allow to > > > use accelerated X with decent resolution (which is > > > unlikely to ever work with most of the XVR cards as > > > Sun didn't open source their drivers nor release the > > > necessary documentation). > > > > Marius, thank you. I bought on of those (15 pounds, ebay) > > and it seems to work ok in the text mode. > > I haven't yet built X successfully, still some errors > > in devel/gobject-intospection > > You'll likely want to use a more lightweight window manager > than GNOME like for example windowmaker on a Blade 1500 > anyway. sure. I don't use gnome anyway. But gobject-introspection is required by hal, which, in turn, is necessary for X. I typically just run mwm. > > Could you also recommend a wireless network card > > for blade 1500? > > Some time ago ath(4) was fixed to work on sparc64 but I'm > not aware of its current state. thank you -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 19 20:04:41 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E59106568B for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:04:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFB798FC14 for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:04:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.93]) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NM5XZ-0000t2-79; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:04:39 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by seis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1NM5XY-0003Ia-Fv; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:04:36 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nBJK4aDE009729; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:04:36 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nBJK4alq009728; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:04:36 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:04:36 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: bzeeb+freebsd+lor@zabbadoz.net, freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20091219200436.GA9715@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Spam-Score: -1.5 X-Spam-Level: - Cc: Subject: LOR #280 on sparc X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:04:41 -0000 this looks like lor #280 On sparc64 9.0-current: # umount /cdrom/ lock order reversal: 1st 0xfffff800012c1cb8 ufs (ufs) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_mount.c:1204 2nd 0xfffff800014f4098 devfs (devfs) @ /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:2188 KDB: stack backtrace: _witness_debugger() at _witness_debugger+0x38 witness_checkorder() at witness_checkorder+0xcf8 __lockmgr_args() at __lockmgr_args+0x8ec vop_stdlock() at vop_stdlock+0x38 VOP_LOCK1_APV() at VOP_LOCK1_APV+0x110 _vn_lock() at _vn_lock+0x80 vrele() at vrele+0x1c0 cd9660_unmount() at cd9660_unmount+0x220 dounmount() at dounmount+0x53c unmount() at unmount+0x3e8 syscall() at syscall+0x2c4 -- syscall (22, FreeBSD ELF64, unmount) %o7=0x101adc -- userland() at 0x40471da8 user trace: trap %o7=0x101adc pc 0x40471da8, sp 0x7fdffffd741 pc 0x101df8, sp 0x7fdffffd8a1 pc 0x102370, sp 0x7fdffffdfc1 pc 0x1012f0, sp 0x7fdffffe0c1 pc 0x4020ae54, sp 0x7fdffffe181 done # -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 19 20:07:35 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94FE3106566B for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:07:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (alchemy.franken.de [194.94.249.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06A908FC13 for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:07:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/ALCHEMY.FRANKEN.DE) with ESMTP id nBJK7UDR057619; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:07:30 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nBJK7Upw057618; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:07:30 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:07:30 +0100 From: Marius Strobl To: Anton Shterenlikht Message-ID: <20091219200730.GW74529@alchemy.franken.de> References: <20091202124137.GA20168@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091202125915.GA20276@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091202192134.GA6562@alchemy.franken.de> <20091203131609.GA86854@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091203141711.GA43641@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091206161815.GA70140@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091207155713.GF6562@alchemy.franken.de> <20091218133634.GA89155@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091219125614.GV74529@alchemy.franken.de> <20091219182004.GA80336@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091219182004.GA80336@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Solved: Re: trouble installing to sun blade 1500 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:07:35 -0000 On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 06:20:04PM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 01:56:14PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 01:36:34PM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > > On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 04:57:13PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: > > > > > > > > > > If I can get nowhere with this card, any advice for > > > > > a card I could buy for Sun Blade 1500 (red or silver)? > > > > > > > > Sun PGX64 would be a good choice as they even allow to > > > > use accelerated X with decent resolution (which is > > > > unlikely to ever work with most of the XVR cards as > > > > Sun didn't open source their drivers nor release the > > > > necessary documentation). > > > > > > Marius, thank you. I bought on of those (15 pounds, ebay) > > > and it seems to work ok in the text mode. > > > I haven't yet built X successfully, still some errors > > > in devel/gobject-intospection > > > > You'll likely want to use a more lightweight window manager > > than GNOME like for example windowmaker on a Blade 1500 > > anyway. > > sure. I don't use gnome anyway. But gobject-introspection is > required by hal, which, in turn, is necessary for X. Ah, ok, I missed that gobject-introspection now also is a dependency of hal. You should avoid using hal by building xorg-server with WITHOUT_HAL defined anyway though; last time I looked at its code it didn't seem like it would work on sparc64 and given that it doesn't exactly work on amd64/i386 either I didn't bother trying to fix it. Marius From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 19 20:11:55 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B4BF106566B for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:11:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 172298FC17 for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:11:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.93]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NM5eY-0001Wo-UF; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:11:53 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by seis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1NM5eY-0003Ur-4k; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:11:50 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nBJKBnjs009760; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:11:49 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nBJKBnBU009759; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:11:49 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:11:49 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Marius Strobl Message-ID: <20091219201149.GB9715@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20091218184220.GA54077@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091218195514.GA64224@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091219130630.GA54383@alchemy.franken.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20091219130630.GA54383@alchemy.franken.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Spam-Score: -4.4 X-Spam-Level: ---- Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: and cdrecord [WAS: burncd error on blade 1500] X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:11:55 -0000 On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 02:06:30PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 07:55:14PM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 06:42:20PM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > > on 9.0 current > > > > > > # burncd -t -f /dev/acd0 data ./trydata fixate > > > burncd: ioctl(CDRIOCINITTRACK): Input/output error > > > # > > > > > > I've hw.ata.atapi_dma=0 in /boot/loader.conf > > > > I also tried cdrecord: > > > > # cdrecord -v -dummy dev=1,0,0 ./z.iso > > cdrecord: No write mode specified. > > cdrecord: Asuming -tao mode. > > cdrecord: Future versions of cdrecord may have different drive dependent default > > s. > > cdrecord: Continuing in 5 seconds... > > Cdrecord-Clone 2.01 (sparc64-unknown-freebsd9.0) Copyright (C) 1995-2004 Jörg Sc > > hilling > > TOC Type: 1 = CD-ROM > > scsidev: '1,0,0' > > scsibus: 1 target: 0 lun: 0 > > cdrecord: Error 0. Cannot open SCSI driver. > > cdrecord: For possible targets try 'cdrecord -scanbus'. > > cdrecord: For possible transport specifiers try 'cdrecord dev=help'. > > > > # camcontrol devlist -v > > scbus0 on ata0 bus 0: > > <> at scbus0 target -1 lun -1 () > > scbus1 on ata1 bus 0: > > at scbus1 target 0 lun 0 () > > <> at scbus1 target -1 lun -1 () > > scbus-1 on xpt0 bus 0: > > <> at scbus-1 target -1 lun -1 (xpt0) > > # > > > > At least for reading atapicam(4) works on sparc64 and cdrecord > is also known to work for writing CDs with SCSI writers on > sparc64, I currently don't have hardware to test whether it's > also possible to write CDs with ATAPI writers using cdrecord > on sparc64 though. Given that atapicam(4) works for reading > it's unlikely that there are bugs preventing writing, I think > it's way more likely that your drive is one of those incapable > of simulating writes or it denies writing in PIO mode. It seems atapicam detects this cdw device ok (from dmesg): cd0 at ata1 bus 0 scbus1 target 0 lun 0 cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device cd0: 16.000MB/s transfers cd0: cd present [1 x 2048 byte records] but scanbus fails: # cdrecord -scanbus Cdrecord-Clone 2.01 (sparc64-unknown-freebsd9.0) Copyright (C) 1995-2004 Jörg Sc hilling cdrecord: Error 0. Cannot open SCSI driver. cdrecord: For possible targets try 'cdrecord -scanbus'. cdrecord: For possible transport specifiers try 'cdrecord dev=help'. # I think cdrecord -scanbus should work even if there is no cdw device present. For example this is what I get on ia64 9.0-current: # cdrecord -scanbus Cdrecord-Clone 2.01 (ia64-unknown-freebsd9.0) Copyright (C) 1995-2004 Jörg Schilling Using libscg version 'schily-0.8'. scsibus0: 0,0,0 0) 'HP 73.4G' 'ST373454LC ' 'HPC2' Disk 0,1,0 1) 'HP 73.4G' 'ST373454LC ' 'HPC2' Disk 0,2,0 2) * 0,3,0 3) * 0,4,0 4) * 0,5,0 5) * 0,6,0 6) * 0,7,0 7) * scsibus1: 1,0,0 100) * 1,1,0 101) * 1,2,0 102) 'SEAGATE ' 'ST318452LC ' '2213' Disk 1,3,0 103) 'HP ' 'C7438A ' 'V303' Removable Tape 1,4,0 104) * 1,5,0 105) * 1,6,0 106) * 1,7,0 107) * # So I think this Cannot open SCSI driver error might be caused by some other problem on my system, and not by the cdw device. But where?? many thanks anton -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 19 20:15:17 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 465CA1065672 for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:15:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F17188FC08 for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:15:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.63]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NM5ho-0001bO-Ab; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:15:15 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by isis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1NM5hn-0003X4-JQ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:15:11 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nBJKFBOn009800; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:15:11 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nBJKFB3g009799; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:15:11 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:15:05 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Marius Strobl Message-ID: <20091219201505.GA9773@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20091202125915.GA20276@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091202192134.GA6562@alchemy.franken.de> <20091203131609.GA86854@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091203141711.GA43641@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091206161815.GA70140@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091207155713.GF6562@alchemy.franken.de> <20091218133634.GA89155@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091219125614.GV74529@alchemy.franken.de> <20091219182004.GA80336@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091219200730.GW74529@alchemy.franken.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091219200730.GW74529@alchemy.franken.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Spam-Score: -1.5 X-Spam-Level: - Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Solved: Re: trouble installing to sun blade 1500 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:15:17 -0000 On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 09:07:30PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: > On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 06:20:04PM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 01:56:14PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 01:36:34PM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 04:57:13PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > If I can get nowhere with this card, any advice for > > > > > > a card I could buy for Sun Blade 1500 (red or silver)? > > > > > > > > > > Sun PGX64 would be a good choice as they even allow to > > > > > use accelerated X with decent resolution (which is > > > > > unlikely to ever work with most of the XVR cards as > > > > > Sun didn't open source their drivers nor release the > > > > > necessary documentation). > > > > > > > > Marius, thank you. I bought on of those (15 pounds, ebay) > > > > and it seems to work ok in the text mode. > > > > I haven't yet built X successfully, still some errors > > > > in devel/gobject-intospection > > > > > > You'll likely want to use a more lightweight window manager > > > than GNOME like for example windowmaker on a Blade 1500 > > > anyway. > > > > sure. I don't use gnome anyway. But gobject-introspection is > > required by hal, which, in turn, is necessary for X. > > Ah, ok, I missed that gobject-introspection now also is a > dependency of hal. You should avoid using hal by building > xorg-server with WITHOUT_HAL defined anyway though; last > time I looked at its code it didn't seem like it would > work on sparc64 and given that it doesn't exactly work on > amd64/i386 either I didn't bother trying to fix it. interesting.. ok, will try. I've been using hal on i386 and ia64 happily for over a year now. No problems there. thank you anton -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 19 20:42:48 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32F811065670 for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:42:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (alchemy.franken.de [194.94.249.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B53468FC0C for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alchemy.franken.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/ALCHEMY.FRANKEN.DE) with ESMTP id nBJKghlv057898; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:42:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius@alchemy.franken.de) Received: (from marius@localhost) by alchemy.franken.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nBJKghBx057897; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:42:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marius) Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:42:43 +0100 From: Marius Strobl To: Anton Shterenlikht Message-ID: <20091219204243.GY74529@alchemy.franken.de> References: <20091218184220.GA54077@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091218195514.GA64224@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091219130630.GA54383@alchemy.franken.de> <20091219201149.GB9715@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=unknown-8bit Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20091219201149.GB9715@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: and cdrecord [WAS: burncd error on blade 1500] X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 20:42:48 -0000 On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 08:11:49PM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 02:06:30PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 07:55:14PM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 06:42:20PM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > > > on 9.0 current > > > > > > > > # burncd -t -f /dev/acd0 data ./trydata fixate > > > > burncd: ioctl(CDRIOCINITTRACK): Input/output error > > > > # > > > > > > > > I've hw.ata.atapi_dma=0 in /boot/loader.conf > > > > > > I also tried cdrecord: > > > > > > # cdrecord -v -dummy dev=1,0,0 ./z.iso > > > cdrecord: No write mode specified. > > > cdrecord: Asuming -tao mode. > > > cdrecord: Future versions of cdrecord may have different drive dependent default > > > s. > > > cdrecord: Continuing in 5 seconds... > > > Cdrecord-Clone 2.01 (sparc64-unknown-freebsd9.0) Copyright (C) 1995-2004 Jörg Sc > > > hilling > > > TOC Type: 1 = CD-ROM > > > scsidev: '1,0,0' > > > scsibus: 1 target: 0 lun: 0 > > > cdrecord: Error 0. Cannot open SCSI driver. > > > cdrecord: For possible targets try 'cdrecord -scanbus'. > > > cdrecord: For possible transport specifiers try 'cdrecord dev=help'. > > > > > > # camcontrol devlist -v > > > scbus0 on ata0 bus 0: > > > <> at scbus0 target -1 lun -1 () > > > scbus1 on ata1 bus 0: > > > at scbus1 target 0 lun 0 () > > > <> at scbus1 target -1 lun -1 () > > > scbus-1 on xpt0 bus 0: > > > <> at scbus-1 target -1 lun -1 (xpt0) > > > # > > > > > > > At least for reading atapicam(4) works on sparc64 and cdrecord > > is also known to work for writing CDs with SCSI writers on > > sparc64, I currently don't have hardware to test whether it's > > also possible to write CDs with ATAPI writers using cdrecord > > on sparc64 though. Given that atapicam(4) works for reading > > it's unlikely that there are bugs preventing writing, I think > > it's way more likely that your drive is one of those incapable > > of simulating writes or it denies writing in PIO mode. > > It seems atapicam detects this cdw device ok (from dmesg): > > cd0 at ata1 bus 0 scbus1 target 0 lun 0 > cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device > cd0: 16.000MB/s transfers > cd0: cd present [1 x 2048 byte records] > > but scanbus fails: > > # cdrecord -scanbus > Cdrecord-Clone 2.01 (sparc64-unknown-freebsd9.0) Copyright (C) 1995-2004 Jörg Sc > hilling > cdrecord: Error 0. Cannot open SCSI driver. > cdrecord: For possible targets try 'cdrecord -scanbus'. > cdrecord: For possible transport specifiers try 'cdrecord dev=help'. > # > > I think cdrecord -scanbus should work even if there is no cdw device > present. There's a bug in cdrtools (fixed in cdrtools-devel since some time) which prevents `cdrecord -scanbus` from working when there's no scbus0. This bug is limited to bus scanning though and the cdrtools otherwise should work when specifiy the target via dev=. I'm not sure whether you're hitting this as accroding to your camcontrol output there's a scsibus0 on your machine. In any case this works just fine with cdrtools-devel here: b1k5# cdrecord -scanbus Cdrecord-ProDVD-ProBD-Clone 2.01.01a62 (sparc64-unknown-freebsd9.0) Copyright (C) 1995-2009 Jrg Schilling Using libscg version 'schily-0.9'. scsibus2: 2,0,0 200) 'JLMS ' 'XJ-HD166S ' 'D3S4' Removable CD-ROM 2,1,0 201) * 2,2,0 202) * 2,3,0 203) * 2,4,0 204) * 2,5,0 205) * 2,6,0 206) * 2,7,0 207) * Marius From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 19 21:48:12 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC62E106566C for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:48:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2C0C8FC13 for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:48:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.63]) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NM79i-0002lP-2k; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:48:11 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by isis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1NM79g-0004qK-VB; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:48:05 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nBJLm4ke010318; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:48:04 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nBJLm3MQ010317; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:48:03 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:48:03 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Marius Strobl Message-ID: <20091219214803.GA10306@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20091202125915.GA20276@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091202192134.GA6562@alchemy.franken.de> <20091203131609.GA86854@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091203141711.GA43641@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091206161815.GA70140@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091207155713.GF6562@alchemy.franken.de> <20091218133634.GA89155@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091219125614.GV74529@alchemy.franken.de> <20091219182004.GA80336@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091219200730.GW74529@alchemy.franken.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20091219200730.GW74529@alchemy.franken.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Spam-Score: -1.5 X-Spam-Level: - Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Solved: Re: trouble installing to sun blade 1500 X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 21:48:13 -0000 On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 09:07:30PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: > On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 06:20:04PM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 01:56:14PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 01:36:34PM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > > > On Mon, Dec 07, 2009 at 04:57:13PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > If I can get nowhere with this card, any advice for > > > > > > a card I could buy for Sun Blade 1500 (red or silver)? > > > > > > > > > > Sun PGX64 would be a good choice as they even allow to > > > > > use accelerated X with decent resolution (which is > > > > > unlikely to ever work with most of the XVR cards as > > > > > Sun didn't open source their drivers nor release the > > > > > necessary documentation). > > > > > > > > Marius, thank you. I bought on of those (15 pounds, ebay) > > > > and it seems to work ok in the text mode. > > > > I haven't yet built X successfully, still some errors > > > > in devel/gobject-intospection > > > > > > You'll likely want to use a more lightweight window manager > > > than GNOME like for example windowmaker on a Blade 1500 > > > anyway. > > > > sure. I don't use gnome anyway. But gobject-introspection is > > required by hal, which, in turn, is necessary for X. > > Ah, ok, I missed that gobject-introspection now also is a > dependency of hal. You should avoid using hal by building > xorg-server with WITHOUT_HAL defined anyway though; last > time I looked at its code it didn't seem like it would > work on sparc64 and given that it doesn't exactly work on > amd64/i386 either I didn't bother trying to fix it. I've built X without hal, but get this error on X -configure: Please advise many thanks as always anton ########################## X.Org X Server 1.6.1 Release Date: 2009-4-14 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0 Build Operating System: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT sparc64 Current Operating System: FreeBSD mech-anton242.men.bris.ac.uk 9.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT #0: Sat Dec 19 18:28:08 GMT 2009 mexas@mech-anton242.men.bris.ac.uk:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HAMOR sparc64 Build Date: 19 December 2009 08:28:07PM Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org to make sure that you have the latest version. Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting, (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational, (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented, (??) unknown. (==) Log file: "/var/log/Xorg.0.log", Time: Sat Dec 19 21:39:16 2009 (II) Loader magic: 0x1508 (II) Module ABI versions: X.Org ANSI C Emulation: 0.4 X.Org Video Driver: 5.0 X.Org XInput driver : 4.0 X.Org Server Extension : 2.0 (II) Loader running on freebsd (--) Using syscons driver with X support (version 8589944945.226) (--) using VT number 9 (--) PCI: (0@0:6:0) ALi Corporation M7101 Power Management Controller [PMU] rev 0 (--) PCI: (1@0:3:0) ATI Technologies Inc Rage XL rev 39, Mem @ 0x01000000/16777216, 0x00100000/4096, I/O @ 0x00000300/256, BIOS @ 0x????????/65536 List of video drivers: mach64 (II) LoadModule: "mach64" (II) Loading /usr/local/lib/xorg/modules/drivers//mach64_drv.so (II) Module mach64: vendor="X.Org Foundation" compiled for 1.6.1, module version = 6.8.1 Module class: X.Org Video Driver ABI class: X.Org Video Driver, version 5.0 (II) System resource ranges: [0] -1 0 0x000f0000 - 0x000fffff (0x10000) MX[B] [1] -1 0 0x000c0000 - 0x000effff (0x30000) MX[B] [2] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x0009ffff (0xa0000) MX[B] [3] -1 0 0x0000ffff - 0x0000ffff (0x1) IX[B] [4] -1 0 0x00000000 - 0x000000ff (0x100) IX[B] (II) MACH64: Driver for ATI Mach64 chipsets (++) Using config file: "/root/xorg.conf.new" (==) ServerLayout "X.org Configured" (**) |-->Screen "Screen0" (0) (**) | |-->Monitor "Monitor0" (**) | |-->Device "Card0" (**) |-->Input Device "Mouse0" (**) |-->Input Device "Keyboard0" (==) Not automatically adding devices (==) Not automatically enabling devices (**) FontPath set to: /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/misc/, /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/, /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/OTF, /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/, /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/, /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/, /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/misc/, /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/TTF/, /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/OTF, /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/Type1/, /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/100dpi/, /usr/local/lib/X11/fonts/75dpi/, built-ins (**) ModulePath set to "/usr/local/lib/xorg/modules" Number of created screens does not match number of detected devices. Configuration failed. -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 19 22:54:56 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3B43106566B for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 22:54:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D2C38FC0A for ; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 22:54:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from isis.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.63]) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NM8CK-0004pG-Sj; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 22:54:55 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by isis.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1NM8CJ-0005ly-T9; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 22:54:52 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id nBJMspFb010673; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 22:54:51 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id nBJMsphS010672; Sat, 19 Dec 2009 22:54:51 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 22:54:51 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Marius Strobl Message-ID: <20091219225451.GA10659@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20091218184220.GA54077@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091218195514.GA64224@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091219130630.GA54383@alchemy.franken.de> <20091219201149.GB9715@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <20091219204243.GY74529@alchemy.franken.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20091219204243.GY74529@alchemy.franken.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) X-Spam-Score: -4.4 X-Spam-Level: ---- Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: SOLVED: Re: and cdrecord [WAS: burncd error on blade 1500] X-BeenThere: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the Sparc List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 22:54:56 -0000 On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 09:42:43PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: > On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 08:11:49PM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > On Sat, Dec 19, 2009 at 02:06:30PM +0100, Marius Strobl wrote: > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 07:55:14PM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > > > On Fri, Dec 18, 2009 at 06:42:20PM +0000, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > > > > on 9.0 current > > > > > > > > > > # burncd -t -f /dev/acd0 data ./trydata fixate > > > > > burncd: ioctl(CDRIOCINITTRACK): Input/output error > > > > > # > > > > > > > > > > I've hw.ata.atapi_dma=0 in /boot/loader.conf > > > > > > > > I also tried cdrecord: > > > > > > > > # cdrecord -v -dummy dev=1,0,0 ./z.iso > > > > cdrecord: No write mode specified. > > > > cdrecord: Asuming -tao mode. > > > > cdrecord: Future versions of cdrecord may have different drive dependent default > > > > s. > > > > cdrecord: Continuing in 5 seconds... > > > > Cdrecord-Clone 2.01 (sparc64-unknown-freebsd9.0) Copyright (C) 1995-2004 Jörg Sc > > > > hilling > > > > TOC Type: 1 = CD-ROM > > > > scsidev: '1,0,0' > > > > scsibus: 1 target: 0 lun: 0 > > > > cdrecord: Error 0. Cannot open SCSI driver. > > > > cdrecord: For possible targets try 'cdrecord -scanbus'. > > > > cdrecord: For possible transport specifiers try 'cdrecord dev=help'. > > > > > > > > # camcontrol devlist -v > > > > scbus0 on ata0 bus 0: > > > > <> at scbus0 target -1 lun -1 () > > > > scbus1 on ata1 bus 0: > > > > at scbus1 target 0 lun 0 () > > > > <> at scbus1 target -1 lun -1 () > > > > scbus-1 on xpt0 bus 0: > > > > <> at scbus-1 target -1 lun -1 (xpt0) > > > > # > > > > > > > > > > At least for reading atapicam(4) works on sparc64 and cdrecord > > > is also known to work for writing CDs with SCSI writers on > > > sparc64, I currently don't have hardware to test whether it's > > > also possible to write CDs with ATAPI writers using cdrecord > > > on sparc64 though. Given that atapicam(4) works for reading > > > it's unlikely that there are bugs preventing writing, I think > > > it's way more likely that your drive is one of those incapable > > > of simulating writes or it denies writing in PIO mode. > > > > It seems atapicam detects this cdw device ok (from dmesg): > > > > cd0 at ata1 bus 0 scbus1 target 0 lun 0 > > cd0: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-0 device > > cd0: 16.000MB/s transfers > > cd0: cd present [1 x 2048 byte records] > > > > but scanbus fails: > > > > # cdrecord -scanbus > > Cdrecord-Clone 2.01 (sparc64-unknown-freebsd9.0) Copyright (C) 1995-2004 Jörg Sc > > hilling > > cdrecord: Error 0. Cannot open SCSI driver. > > cdrecord: For possible targets try 'cdrecord -scanbus'. > > cdrecord: For possible transport specifiers try 'cdrecord dev=help'. > > # > > > > I think cdrecord -scanbus should work even if there is no cdw device > > present. > > There's a bug in cdrtools (fixed in cdrtools-devel since some time) > which prevents `cdrecord -scanbus` from working when there's no > scbus0. This bug is limited to bus scanning though and the cdrtools > otherwise should work when specifiy the target via dev=. I'm not > sure whether you're hitting this as accroding to your camcontrol > output there's a scsibus0 on your machine. In any case this works > just fine with cdrtools-devel here: > b1k5# cdrecord -scanbus > Cdrecord-ProDVD-ProBD-Clone 2.01.01a62 (sparc64-unknown-freebsd9.0) Copyright (C) 1995-2009 Jrg Schilling > Using libscg version 'schily-0.9'. > scsibus2: > 2,0,0 200) 'JLMS ' 'XJ-HD166S ' 'D3S4' Removable CD-ROM > 2,1,0 201) * > 2,2,0 202) * > 2,3,0 203) * > 2,4,0 204) * > 2,5,0 205) * > 2,6,0 206) * > 2,7,0 207) * sorry, my fault.. forgot device pass in kernel. Now all is fine: mech-anton242# cdrecord -scanbus Cdrecord-ProDVD-ProBD-Clone 2.01.01a69 (sparc64-unknown-freebsd9.0) Copyright (C) 1995-2009 Jörg Schilling Using libscg version 'schily-0.9'. scsibus1: 1,0,0 100) 'TSSTcorp' 'CDW/DVD TS-H492C' 'SI00' Removable CD-ROM 1,1,0 101) * 1,2,0 102) * 1,3,0 103) * 1,4,0 104) * 1,5,0 105) * 1,6,0 106) * 1,7,0 107) * mech-anton242# sorry for being an idiot, and many thanks for your continuing support and advice P.S. it's good news this cdw is working (just recorded a cd and read back). This model is used in all blade 1500 (red or silver) coming out of service. -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423