Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2010 11:59:16 +0300 From: Achilleas Mantzios <achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Subject: Re: jdk16 vs openjdk Message-ID: <201011011059.16227.achill@matrix.gatewaynet.com> In-Reply-To: <op.vld7kwqt8527sy@pinky> References: <40bff08b3502166b8e1e21c7df2a584c.squirrel@webmail.ultra-secure.de> <op.vld7kwqt8527sy@pinky>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=CE=A3=CF=84=CE=B9=CF=82 Saturday 30 October 2010 17:23:10 =CE=BF/=CE=B7 Ro= nald Klop =CE=AD=CE=B3=CF=81=CE=B1=CF=88=CE=B5: > On Thu, 28 Oct 2010 20:57:04 +0200, <rainer@ultra-secure.de> wrote: >=20 > > Hi, > > > > can someone clarify the status of jdk16 vs. openjdk16? > > > > At what patchlevel (in terms of JSE6_uXX) is the diablo-jdk16 download = at > > the FreeBSD-foundation? > > > > Will it get updated to the latest patchlevel (u22) any time? > > > > Or should one just use OpenJDK16? > > > > > > Best Regards, > > Rainer >=20 > I would bet on openjdk6. As it is already much more up-to-date than jdk16= =2E =20 > I think openjdk6 gets more love. :-) i think jdk16 should be marked as deprecated, since this confuses a lot of = people. >=20 > Ronald. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-java@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-java-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 =2D-=20 Achilleas Mantzios
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201011011059.16227.achill>