From owner-freebsd-performance@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 4 17:38:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A6B1065672 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 17:38:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grarpamp@gmail.com) Received: from mail-px0-f182.google.com (mail-px0-f182.google.com [209.85.212.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A1808FC08 for ; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 17:38:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pxi1 with SMTP id 1so306573pxi.13 for ; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 10:38:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=9m3RfhmN2gswxlX9HK3w+z953M8V51U0qZNLbiZwfDA=; b=FDfCBiLB6addg7Fss1mLGov12/4QLycE8J6nPTCYptSjO3p9JZU2D6Ivm64bahxV3+ aKz+orX64Bl4EaUootGql0hzlso1AYVk+XEYeEDNJSVPpNuAU/MVmpvdaZQHhUMnz9Pi BmFF4VW0H+kncDMsHmjnEGzSnKmkIS4R0BA3I= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=MBeE7A75tiw4dY6si6JVvgNoQUukB497d14Z4HITEAMJ1oA98G1isQFCzSZarKgi46 M2zSFlwC93wPEafiSw+YMFJl2/wht7kyFCzMvzYCmRvK13rzKLs1qPyxLUYc36PCPIu1 /1+Uz4tjaoboyqVGIopbM7wNGca6o1mJF3XbI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.143.41.8 with SMTP id t8mr901458wfj.89.1288890458431; Thu, 04 Nov 2010 10:07:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.142.164.12 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Nov 2010 10:07:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2010 13:07:38 -0400 Message-ID: From: grarpamp To: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 17:58:22 +0000 Subject: Tracking performance areas over time X-BeenThere: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Performance/tuning List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 17:38:18 -0000 Not as comparison with FreeBSD but ideas for tracking FreeBSD performance across release/releng. http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=linux_2612_2637&num=1 Provided the version of the unit test is kept the same and it compiles across all FreeBSD release/releng since 2.x, automating like this shouldn't be hard. Natively release install [or selfhost build releng on top], and archive the base platforms once. Copy over to a test disk and reboot it natively on demand, insert each unit test module as desired, record data, copy disk and boot next version, etc...