From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 12 01:17:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DF77106564A for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 01:17:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0F0A8FC20 for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 01:17:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id oBC1HLGW072331; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 12:17:22 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 12:17:21 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Chris Brennan In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20101212114850.G38069@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20101210060704.A3B641065783@hub.freebsd.org> <20101211002225.D61647@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <20101211162408.00005afe@unknown> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Bruce Cran , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: xpbargains.net spam [was: Re: 'Broadcom Wireless b/g (BCM4315/BCM22062000)'] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 01:17:34 -0000 On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 11:30:19 -0500, Chris Brennan wrote: > On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Bruce Cran wrote: > > > On Sat, 11 Dec 2010 10:41:48 -0500 > > Chris Brennan wrote: > > > > > Does GMail provide access to the full headers? > > > > Click the down arrow and select "Show original". > > > > -- > > Bruce Cran > > > > Awesome! Thanks Bruce. Now I can put what Ian provided to good use :D Yeah good onya Bruce .. I was about to reply that mail headers was one area where gmail provided a little too much in the way of privacy for the message poster, ie headers don't reveal Chris' IP address on this. Chris, could you mail me a copy of those full headers privately? Still curious whether this skanky mob have shifted their operation somewhere. cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 12 01:55:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCF77106566B for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 01:55:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Received: from shell0.rawbw.com (shell0.rawbw.com [198.144.192.45]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF9E8FC12 for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 01:55:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from eagle.yuri.org (stunnel@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell0.rawbw.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBC1sp8G056317 for ; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:54:52 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from yuri@rawbw.com) Message-ID: <4D042B98.60907@rawbw.com> Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:55:36 -0800 From: Yuri User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101211 Thunderbird/3.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Ports: How do dependent ports upgrade when dependency shared lib version is bumped? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 01:55:37 -0000 I recently updates the system. libatkmm-1.6.so.1 got bumped to libatkmm-1.6.so.2, now inkscape fails: /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libatkmm-1.6.so.1" not found, required by "inkscape" What is the right behavior in such situation? Should all depending packages be also automatically bumped? Or portupghrade should detect the change and automatically upgrade dependent ports? Yuri From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 12 02:42:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B2EB106564A for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 02:42:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18E7E8FC14 for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 02:42:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id oBC2e7Lf066524; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 21:40:07 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id oBC2e6To066523; Sat, 11 Dec 2010 21:40:06 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 21:40:06 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: S Mathias Message-ID: <20101212024006.GB66462@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <295012.67479.qm@web121408.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <295012.67479.qm@web121408.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "ultimate" backup choice X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 02:42:53 -0000 On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 04:17:46AM -0800, S Mathias wrote: > i have: > "SERVER A" > "SERVER B" > > with "full root permisson" [ssh, etc] > > each server has a folder. > > i want to backup a folder in "SERVER A". > > are there any backup methods, that meets these two requirements? : > > > 1) running from e.g.: a cronjob > > 2) when running, it just checks the folder in "SERVER A" and "SERVER B". if a file/folder has been added/removed/modified in the "SERVER A"'s folder, then it copies/removes it/them to "SERVER B"'s folder. > > please help! Yes. Learn to RSYNC. Does exactly what you ask, easily. ////jerry > > Thank you in advance! [for any links, howtos :\ ] > > have a nice weekend > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 12 10:13:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CE6F106564A for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 10:13:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f49.google.com (mail-bw0-f49.google.com [209.85.214.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 085568FC0C for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 10:13:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so5841641bwz.8 for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 02:13:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:reply-to :in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=z4T4eUnjifcU/kj2LbhVr1hNilrL1h0gImjGENRqMGY=; b=CtgLGabT8tMDKQCs/3MTJ+s16+qdgRBIySgXv58KU8mI4nhqeBdTYTNTdPGuFWEcvi 3qSmVmqHxBPIIFMFV+U8RAdWkR4CJE1OLPSn/K6dWgC5Q9iKuTNiUDzN/We0dRnHuwQw Tm5STJ0iPEaj917GqEXB8lg6AjyC2Dgz2oh4E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:content-type; b=mWhEOD5+Noh//tSwXQMVRpm+DAih04Okl0ApXsJCxpzkclkaKk6txbr/lLbM2UVlIt V8d7x4ULdr4qkHoqT17TPrlENvkzm/EkgTtVHqcpGxfnrvZ48xcqfkn2Z858g0iLIFl6 b1p7r+nOBNllGMSilO6EjmSGFuNUsZK1W0hCg= Received: by 10.204.65.3 with SMTP id g3mr1000550bki.139.1292148809826; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 02:13:29 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.52.19 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 02:12:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Chris Rees Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 10:12:59 +0000 Message-ID: To: "K. Yura" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: Re: pass for single user mode X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: utisoft@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 10:13:31 -0000 On 11 December 2010 16:55, K. Yura wrote: > 2010/12/11 Chris Rees >> >> Have a look at /etc/ttys. >> Chris > Thank you very much No problem. Don't forget that although you've now made it non-trivial to break into your computer with console access, it's still easy for a physical attacker to: - remove your hard drive - boot from a USB key or CD or floppy etc - mess with your BIOS settings. This is why by default there's no root password for single user; if an attacker has physical access you're screwed anyway! Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 12 10:48:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1233) id A84051065674; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 10:48:14 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 10:48:14 +0000 From: Alexander Best To: Yuri Message-ID: <20101212104814.GA52041@freebsd.org> References: <4D042B98.60907@rawbw.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D042B98.60907@rawbw.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports: How do dependent ports upgrade when dependency shared lib version is bumped? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 10:48:14 -0000 On Sat Dec 11 10, Yuri wrote: > I recently updates the system. libatkmm-1.6.so.1 got bumped to > libatkmm-1.6.so.2, now inkscape fails: > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libatkmm-1.6.so.1" not found, > required by "inkscape" > > What is the right behavior in such situation? Should all depending > packages be also automatically bumped? Or portupghrade should detect the > change and automatically upgrade dependent ports? portupgrade -rfx atkmm atkmm should take care of the issue, although portupgrade -rf atkmm is probably ok too, unless atkmm takes multiple hours to build. as a workaround you could also add an entry to /etc/libmap.conf: libatkmm-1.6.so.1 libatkmm-1.6.so.2 if things in libatkmm haven't changed too much you might get away with it for now and delay the portupgrade to some time that's more convenient to you. cheers. alex > > Yuri > -- a13x From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 12 15:21:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04A47106566C for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 15:21:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smathias1972@yahoo.com) Received: from web121405.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (web121405.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.90.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B141B8FC17 for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 15:21:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18583 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Dec 2010 15:21:03 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1292167263; bh=Nnrsw0Ssy18achidDR8tsd4TGmqlIufyM9yczkzITXI=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=aP9Q+kshvdGSIA7cwdoMBGTIVIIeObdvDuyCxPMZItONagDwNieEM2Zh9KEOLqoX5vwl+WUyLW86bKcUPzLBYVqFnTeeZvY6qrQPw/Zm6M5lIqfgWreLrzohLa/t7yKMNisUisx16DD8aILz8yLK0eABfn7Xty8yezGcTptPG9A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=4d8i/1u82d4VWOqcidTnIjEmBfbnaIj0tyf9tYtveXD7jFpzuBw38bsJBwhxIgR0o3fzg+5YELLVgHQuD/8b+lWn8ZtQpPzjEUGXoeltBmunV0ZXDOpEuwGDdBASt2WJIO2mqZB5z0qHbydI3A4JYdQ1XBrM5hZ/PY/YGjHgzwU=; Message-ID: <120051.16937.qm@web121405.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: pl0OD2kVM1mL6X3UQz6oWvWKnqMgX9Ht3p2mbs0VcA7VqUs BPBYpgnkuj9yser7u75VWDG3rGycZlpfIJFkdT4CB8uTpwftpWMmwW0GFMC4 vYGLS_SXx2wpWrE9lJ5UAonZYiaMxMW8j.OG_lbciMW72VnFIcLteL1.Lz9z jIN3YSG0Ca0QWgEgvbzB6.nxDy87jIRvCrUmxrQl_pHwUqfVsKXOp._m.gkR l3EdIuPf9lDSS9gq_1LCL Received: from [178.164.166.61] by web121405.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 07:21:03 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.20 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 07:21:03 -0800 (PST) From: S Mathias To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 16:23:15 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: openssl chat X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 15:21:04 -0000 i can use "natively" openssl for anonymous chat: # Chat: # server side: openssl req -x509 -nodes -days 365 -newkey rsa:8192 -keyout mycert.pem -out mycert.pem # server side - generate a self-signed cert. openssl s_server -accept 52310 -cert mycert.pem # client side - "127.0.0.1" is the IP of the server openssl s_client -connect 127.0.0.1:52310 1) but how can i set it to require username/password? it would be a great chat tool 2) how can i transfer files with openssl? [again: with username/password?] thank you for any ideas :\ p.s.: or it will be a firewall rule, to restrict to ip addresses in a list? those, who are only allowed to connect.. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 12 16:36:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C92C1065673 for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 16:36:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E821E8FC12 for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 16:36:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 21610 invoked from network); 12 Dec 2010 16:36:00 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail4.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 12 Dec 2010 16:36:00 -0000 Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.6]) by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 153325080B; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 11:35:51 -0500 (EST) Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 3A8F51CC7A; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 11:35:51 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: Yuri References: <4D042B98.60907@rawbw.com> Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 11:35:50 -0500 In-Reply-To: <4D042B98.60907@rawbw.com> (yuri@rawbw.com's message of "Sat, 11 Dec 2010 17:55:36 -0800") Message-ID: <447hffuexl.fsf@lowell-desk.lan> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ports: How do dependent ports upgrade when dependency shared lib version is bumped? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 16:36:01 -0000 Yuri writes: > I recently updates the system. libatkmm-1.6.so.1 got bumped to > libatkmm-1.6.so.2, now inkscape fails: > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libatkmm-1.6.so.1" not found, > required by "inkscape" > > What is the right behavior in such situation? Should all depending > packages be also automatically bumped? Or portupghrade should detect > the change and automatically upgrade dependent ports? There's no way to do it fully automatically, but porters try to do this by hand, by incrementing PORTREVISION for the dependent ports. Once that is done, portupgrade will pick it up automatically. However, porters will sometimes miss subtle dependencies, especially optional ones. In this case, I don't see a direct dependency of inkscape on atkmm, so I don't know how it should have been marked. In any case, inkscape was updated shortly after atkmm, so if you upgraded everything more recently, it looks like you should have gotten inkscape rebuilt after the atkmm change. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 12 17:45:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8DB91065679 for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 17:45:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from materribile@yahoo.com) Received: from nm22.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com (nm22.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com [98.139.91.92]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 843248FC19 for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 17:45:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.139.91.69] by nm22.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Dec 2010 17:45:38 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.35] by tm9.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Dec 2010 17:45:38 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1035.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Dec 2010 17:45:38 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 42724.56931.bm@omp1035.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 45927 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Dec 2010 17:45:37 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1292175937; bh=DDpknbplOD+SHoAubbOsVDGTWQJSkPolvaKcgwxAcqA=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=YetXjs2nsYDbGR2e62gxK9JC/nlZ//5dqiHc5i2XE0c/210VYAqVZYT2G/4P/r/RWiFqFDpqCP7xfju2IEfK/CEGwPKuSRFsl6Qy1ELvay2pZ4qh5pqJWYa8T2aAJMzM2Nuxzaor6hy+aSC9DUUde8k45Sh9U/MIfmEXqMYda8U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=OXSpdA9It9czpe0mufRjpEFP2CcpAZDcAo/1h6yV4A+qoL0xrcu6i+7gCEGvf7C+TpK0L0KoygdVqIciXWB40eIbtaMUcdfYrWv3Hbgeyr+8oGp0vULOTmm8T8rMxXpxGeQfhpA98Oj8YlzWxLYwMAtU84C6kSTXlZ2gh4z0WoA=; Message-ID: <709178.44988.qm@web110304.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: Soture8VM1npTBqyL7DtkrYKanuQrTWKMSmM9QqUUZTjRPI 6x9hoJHuCHILY_F6TUK3ZXnegvG89kyAINCteuAiTVnEFtC9RVk5o_k7sPQ3 a007TDlVPzTtIocx4AZjA97wyNGUfEqfLOoMR932xRyKQT.XcipuSrDlPb_V J5pP7HZt4rRZ_y.n6PZWf6_5k6ERCTCrvqCLpBuokpS9Spwz93vB4QoJRYoX ZhWQffR5evg_nwg132gYdMWoyTYaU63Wn2YvzavsYuSKbuWkiBCt10WISKrp PhVktG5YvISHjaTqWWNwlO.8jzryIPvAs8PCRicGD_eEocBPJl53FZO1xWOF lJX5rK9Xpzr1UqZG6hyrXDfQ5ph29zV8BYOsRgegHSQnrwmkVUexoGx02AXL hOBX6.1PlLMjF Received: from [24.228.57.153] by web110304.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 09:45:37 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.20 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 09:45:37 -0800 (PST) From: Mark Terribile To: S Mathias , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20101212120029.9002610657DF@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Subject: Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 340, Issue 15 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 17:45:38 -0000 > > It's ok, that i can use this, when i want an incrementing > sequence, in a given way: > > # {START..END..INCREMENT} > $ for i in {0..10..2}; do echo "Welcome $i times"; done > Welcome 0 times > Welcome 2 times > Welcome 4 times > Welcome 6 times > Welcome 8 times > Welcome 10 times > $ > > but what's the "magic" for this? : > > $ MAGIC; do echo "Welcome $i times"; done > Welcome 0 times > Welcome 1 times > Welcome 4 times > Welcome 5 times > Welcome 8 times > Welcome 9 times > $ What's wrong with for i in 0 1 4 5 8 9 ; do echo "Welcome $i times"; done ? Or is there some rule that you want followed? If there is, it's not obvious to me. (Sorry.) Mark Terribile From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 12 17:55:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B4C1065670 for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 17:55:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from extrudedaluminiu@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B0ED8FC17 for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 17:55:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so5409084qwj.13 for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 09:55:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:date:from:x-x-sender :to:subject:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=PvStF/b+AZIdUAAKK5u4xQ3hBOD6ZnT0xOThWi6T4vM=; b=p7qFXoeLFfJpXM4UCnOvfEUA4PXrl+QiecP9+HrMeUr3E2fJziRNEt4ug2S+AIqsRC FIrAx7ynKFUUQa8Y+Sq9mcAZChjcTo16EbSYc4eMYrbsmKFU8nEP6HAa5fPVjfL2zhB7 514VtK19zN3Tv/0iE0ixOkMpmxWUv/whi5Z64= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:date:from:x-x-sender:to:subject:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; b=ZXEQMTV7HVczFwMlblM+WXAu3wTu5u9iOyT5TQcBqT6hlJbOYXb+SMb0cgLgSbO7sD kh6F9vvC6oGOCWbCMdisjdSP4NNB158aYC/lQJVR8CQHJCqj1gB2DcMaUhVphgZWXOfO z5siq1sUXeSTfUtrp2fx9fgaknohcRj3zpw/0= Received: by 10.229.104.211 with SMTP id q19mr2951171qco.135.1292174898676; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 09:28:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from batman.acm.jhu.edu (batman.acm.jhu.edu [128.220.251.35]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n7sm3445800qcu.16.2010.12.12.09.28.17 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 12 Dec 2010 09:28:17 -0800 (PST) Sender: Venkatesh Srinivas Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 12:28:16 -0500 (EST) From: Venkatesh Srinivas X-X-Sender: me@centaur.acm.jhu.edu To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Subject: FreeBSD SMP website stale links update? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 17:55:11 -0000 Hi, http://www.freebsd.org/smp/ has a few stale links: "* Hiten Pandya's SMP synchronization rules" points to: http://storm.uk.freebsd.org/~hiten/smp_synch_rules.html ; it should perhaps point to http://people.freebsd.org/~hmp/stuff/docs/smp_synch_rules.html ? "5 July 2000" "* Jake Burkholder put an updated patch here" points to an inaccessible http://people.freebsd.org/~jake/smpng.diff I've been able to track down a copy and have posted it at http://acm.jhu.edu/~me/smpng.diff ; perhaps it should have a home on freebsd.org? "3 August 2000" 'Patches with functional heavy-weight thread for i386...' pointed at http://people.freebsd.org/~grog/patches4.gz , also not accesible; I've put a copy at http://acm.jhu.edu/~me/patches4.gz ; should this too find a permananent home? Thanks! -- vs From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 12 18:48:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44A8B1065670 for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 18:48:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ryallsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDCB18FC0C for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 18:48:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk8 with SMTP id 8so2370634qyk.13 for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 10:48:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=O8sODMTLAwzLTAMqyDcoXKNf+BdATveX6iuRWQY61CY=; b=SrdWCaP+TDbMm9KT/ozBsm8PfQtSQP+Z3Wx4bukKS37eqvzHIGx6OZ1A46sZVJ08Vb ziuo7q1hBylqjof9a/RzDT9GSWOdgUEByWCzfpsb++TVbcVqbG/peuPLish0NHFgXsCB fIaYtApKu8hZPUU6gh6CvN+hbVLEDs13ViSJI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=se9k+Og6Bjs8oT/Fs5E/zitretzObotRsVYCIUWdp6qNo7KbZlVqYy7kpcP4L9wGA6 gnwHS0Ip8lHA05PE5R9RFddCIiK0zTlxTffh4S1ywvCwambUkCYafUwv4w/xVp8Jdmo0 k61EnwG2vpSOLjAUR29KpT4olLyb9XMkdAbKk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.228.146 with SMTP id je18mr2999458qcb.47.1292178122365; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 10:22:02 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.192.70 with HTTP; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 10:22:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <709178.44988.qm@web110304.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <20101212120029.9002610657DF@hub.freebsd.org> <709178.44988.qm@web110304.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 10:22:02 -0800 Message-ID: From: Derrick Ryalls To: Mark Terribile Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: S Mathias , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 340, Issue 15 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 18:48:23 -0000 On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Mark Terribile wrote: > > > > It's ok, that i can use this, when i want an incrementing > > sequence, in a given way: > > > > # {START..END..INCREMENT} > > $ for i in {0..10..2}; do echo "Welcome $i times"; done > > Welcome 0 times > > Welcome 2 times > > Welcome 4 times > > Welcome 6 times > > Welcome 8 times > > Welcome 10 times > > $ > > > > but what's the "magic" for this? : > > > > $ MAGIC; do echo "Welcome $i times"; done > > Welcome 0 times > > Welcome 1 times > > Welcome 4 times > > Welcome 5 times > > Welcome 8 times > > Welcome 9 times > > $ > > What's wrong with > > for i in 0 1 4 5 8 9 ; do echo "Welcome $i times"; done > > ? > > Or is there some rule that you want followed? If there is, it's not > obvious to me. (Sorry.) > > Mark Terribile > > > +1, +3, +1, +3.... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 12 19:11:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E0F6106564A for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 19:11:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sterling@camdensoftware.com) Received: from wh2.interactivevillages.com (wh2.interactivevillages.com [75.125.250.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 619498FC12 for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 19:11:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 174-21-106-20.tukw.qwest.net ([174.21.106.20] helo=_HOSTNAME_) by wh2.interactivevillages.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PRs7u-0006yq-Nf for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 12:02:35 -0800 Received: by _HOSTNAME_ (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Sun, 12 Dec 2010 11:11:10 -0800 Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 11:11:10 -0800 From: Chip Camden To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101212191110.GB97909@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101212120029.9002610657DF@hub.freebsd.org> <709178.44988.qm@web110304.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="wq9mPyueHGvFACwf" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Company: Camden Software Consulting URL: http://camdensoftware.com X-PGP-Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xD6DBAF91 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - wh2.interactivevillages.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - camdensoftware.com Subject: Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 340, Issue 15 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 19:11:16 -0000 --wq9mPyueHGvFACwf Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Quoth Derrick Ryalls on Sunday, 12 December 2010: > On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Mark Terribile wr= ote: >=20 > > > > > > It's ok, that i can use this, when i want an incrementing > > > sequence, in a given way: > > > > > > # {START..END..INCREMENT} > > > $ for i in {0..10..2}; do echo "Welcome $i times"; done > > > Welcome 0 times > > > Welcome 2 times > > > Welcome 4 times > > > Welcome 6 times > > > Welcome 8 times > > > Welcome 10 times > > > $ > > > > > > but what's the "magic" for this? : > > > > > > $ MAGIC; do echo "Welcome $i times"; done > > > Welcome 0 times > > > Welcome 1 times > > > Welcome 4 times > > > Welcome 5 times > > > Welcome 8 times > > > Welcome 9 times > > > $ > > > > What's wrong with > > > > for i in 0 1 4 5 8 9 ; do echo "Welcome $i times"; done > > > > ? > > > > Or is there some rule that you want followed? If there is, it's not > > obvious to me. (Sorry.) > > > > Mark Terribile > > > > > > +1, +3, +1, +3.... > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" How about a direct approach: i=3D0;j=3D1 while true;do echo Welcome $i times i=3D`expr $i + $j`;if [ $j -eq 1 ];then;j=3D3;else;j=3D1;fi done Might want to pipe that to more or less. --=20 Sterling (Chip) Camden | sterling@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F http://camdensoftware.com | http://chipstips.com | http://chipsquips= .com --wq9mPyueHGvFACwf Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNBR5OAAoJEIpckszW26+R2WAH/2GB+wu8Rxi/BzkhXgKpkfZP OzrdNtzR0KkiU5b+/JT5E5lTNuCIMymHQ4TdmD0MEBQU8AiE1AraAO5SXkhzdfj3 hKYtR+Kk27uh65rJvcTYU7SnKBVtC+iEqQ9BNLcT7uAHPyl0NIRZ+9byV2xfPFL3 0m/CYrUkrZxW9qkPSc01aEfCIAzweZgGGrHzbRBV+DraS37w0RMapkaRegGHsam2 upmt7uc/fve/zL4Ca6GGX6XHpCfC01r4P8Hw8N1R5s8l/JTGnj2NA/qRpgMhglfy vqEJoMFvfr1yug0W9kDy7J0RhqiPlqp2whNHwBzE70o3295t3/HgxbU+VarIGig= =1f14 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --wq9mPyueHGvFACwf-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 12 19:26:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81AC4106564A for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 19:26:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from materribile@yahoo.com) Received: from nm24.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com (nm24.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com [98.139.91.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 5834D8FC12 for ; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 19:26:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.139.91.61] by nm24.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Dec 2010 19:26:44 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.13] by tm1.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Dec 2010 19:26:44 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1013.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Dec 2010 19:26:44 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 68024.67302.bm@omp1013.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 69988 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Dec 2010 19:26:43 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1292182003; bh=Kv9smi7YBbt9xpoxpPrV3s0G3/yuGPsO8IvjFJRpptk=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=3jrexsFBOKmlqTG/iFOnoKWbwB44OGKOlXY+EZN7MBm/pP2bwjVfTOLm2aWcEZCCVbVhQyZ4nBRG27Q/0kWWkIPLKKAr3BFbwyMIDa68pm7mKBJOL1SBgQuvy/SAtZp12aFsHoeCsGpDQp4lBustwlfKYpBo5Lj7MdUbpDj1Seg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=VrzAFi0h+asJtcucihcJ9E5u1DUQK8Oj3JgqhnPQ834IKMwwcSljkXTjVIskDWDh8vUARGzPOGWxrJ2at1GjtZk1uUOXawgeWHvtB9vzurbrV0CwBo58h7I4TPzZurZVeetjkTJ5B2tJZiW+2QuqxhGT9UB4WEsSJIPf8OJqKio=; Message-ID: <636022.69287.qm@web110310.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: atFKUWQVM1mAd.5TvtkJOBxn6lAsW8gAb_CuWiRGqQhAcRI XcCZvObx4M4Q1rj.xCRJ5VpD7t8FZ3MCCuceBeavLvb5R7sGF5X3h46Rt30l Bc6R2A4Um2EQ6ynBNBRRliFeXo7vO4s07TaKGfwEisKc.jGYCSe6CaJnrzlb TgUFnFS2jAhIO5zISFaKNk6Cmv62jp1sOPHXNZDEZEKaRxiogvBQh1T3HluB a1kwSQ0vzI97kNFJhkET8ezSL7ZLd.edB0HstjlCTbdoZg2CYkTjKPpLz_XN .dJFCjfOO4IcmTvLuDJeSluTm1rVYSl9Lveeb7ckpN_CiFKp2oUb4hw.Kxal k08PB6GU6Vx19y8WQTJb4NlK9igsBQMWinyYH71VEMVe0gGh7XrsJs2DCP4W A_2cRGLtSyRX. Received: from [24.228.57.153] by web110310.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 12 Dec 2010 11:26:43 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.20 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 11:26:43 -0800 (PST) From: Mark Terribile To: Derrick Ryalls In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: S Mathias , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 340, Issue 15 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 19:26:44 -0000 Okay, per private correspondence, here's one that works for the rule (inser= t your own upper limit): (( s =3D -3, d =3D -1 )) ; while (( i =3D ( s +=3D 2 + ( d =3D -d ) ),=A0 i= <=3D 12 )) ; do =A0=A0=A0 echo "Welcome $i times" done Yeah, this needs an explanation in the comments, and it might be tricky to extend to other sequences.=A0 But I think I could do it for most reasonable= ones. --- On Sun, 12/12/10, Derrick Ryalls wrote: From: Derrick Ryalls Subject: Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 340, Issue 15 To: "Mark Terribile" Cc: "S Mathias" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sunday, December 12, 2010, 1:22 PM On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Mark Terribile wro= te: =0A> =0A> It's ok, that i can use this, when i want an incrementing =0A> sequence, in a given way: =0A> =0A> # {START..END..INCREMENT} =0A> $ for i in {0..10..2}; do echo "Welcome $i times"; done =0A> Welcome 0 times =0A> Welcome 2 times =0A> Welcome 4 times =0A> Welcome 6 times =0A> Welcome 8 times =0A> Welcome 10 times =0A> $ =0A> =0A> but what's the "magic" for this? : =0A> =0A> $ MAGIC; do echo "Welcome $i times"; done =0A> Welcome 0 times =0A> Welcome 1 times =0A> Welcome 4 times =0A> Welcome 5 times =0A> Welcome 8 times =0A> Welcome 9 times =0A> $ =0A =0AWhat's wrong with =0A =0Afor i in 0 1 4 5 8 9 ; do echo "Welcome $i times"; done =0A =0A =A0? =0A =0AOr is there some rule that you want followed? =A0If there is, it's not =0Aobvious to me. =A0(Sorry.) =0A =0A =A0 =A0Mark Terribile =0A =0A +1, +3, +1, +3.... =0A=0A=0A=0A From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 13 13:59:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C526106564A; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 13:59:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B57E98FC0A; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 13:59:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0A37E63D6; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 13:59:57 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from :to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=wDsA5Mt48Qcl 5n1pn3eMr7xG3hc=; b=JN9Aof2SV/rT+NQLwGuuiOUhYKVCbH0vzgNVVnFP3UrJ XdamD3MUDzcLe8489p2txnp4l7TwVEgR7SwoGecbSEfj9/JXWR0CMH9FcLjXgADT jydUmm27zcaaqDoGSbCiLYJP5D/2PrkZC5+C7mKgoz2NuI2d1bp+5T8tAtvgagE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from:to :cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=mQLkM+ 9nI7D/aU0aPs5Q9Y2imd0kDqYvAJfqckO4Zx/qOj6mTsVUMehDQGPNvsbXzMRNKP lZNCI2JTSpSERauD+hLZ895eYE4c5jdXBLwOz7yr7sLnGR4dUhrngKrztrmgcdpC dcz3K1p/NKmcb3K0psRNL0B+TcR5YFTP76RHQ= Received: from core.draftnet (client-86-27-21-134.glfd.adsl.virginmedia.com [86.27.21.134]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4D31AE62E7; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 13:59:57 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 13:59:32 +0000 From: Bruce Cran To: Ian Smith Message-ID: <20101213135932.0e48f6cd@core.draftnet> In-Reply-To: <20091208003536.H12012@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20091128113000.BBDF410656E6@hub.freebsd.org> <20091205212857.H34611@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <4B1D0054.4060406@razorfever.net> <20091208003536.H12012@sola.nimnet.asn.au> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.7 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Derek \(freebsd lists\)" <482254ac@razorfever.net>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Randi Harper Subject: Re: 8.0-RELEASE-i386-memstick fixit - No USB devices found! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 13:59:59 -0000 On Tue, 8 Dec 2009 00:48:21 +1100 (EST) Ian Smith wrote: > If nothing else, might adding a quick "(try Options/Rescan Devices)" > to the "No USB devices" message text help some folks out of this > quandary? Since it looks like major work to sysinstall isn't going to happen I've committed the change to the error message. -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 13 14:51:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D0741065698 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:51:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 911B58FC31 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:51:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id oBDEpNNB090769; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 01:51:24 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 01:51:23 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Bruce Cran In-Reply-To: <20101213135932.0e48f6cd@core.draftnet> Message-ID: <20101214011458.N83735@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20091128113000.BBDF410656E6@hub.freebsd.org> <20091205212857.H34611@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <4B1D0054.4060406@razorfever.net> <20091208003536.H12012@sola.nimnet.asn.au> <20101213135932.0e48f6cd@core.draftnet> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: "Derek \(freebsd lists\)" <482254ac@razorfever.net>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Randi Harper Subject: Re: 8.0-RELEASE-i386-memstick fixit - No USB devices found! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 14:51:35 -0000 On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, Bruce Cran wrote: > On Tue, 8 Dec 2009 00:48:21 +1100 (EST) > Ian Smith wrote: > > > If nothing else, might adding a quick "(try Options/Rescan Devices)" > > to the "No USB devices" message text help some folks out of this > > quandary? > > Since it looks like major work to sysinstall isn't going to happen > I've committed the change to the error message. Thanks Bruce, may it save a little head-scratching. Oh, just in case; that was written before I noticed that there were two of these .. smithi on t23% find . -exec grep -H 'USB devices' {} \; ./install.c: msgConfirm("No USB devices found!"); ./media.c: msgConfirm("No USB devices found!"); cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 13 15:25:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61B92106566C for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:25:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frederic.perrin@resel.fr) Received: from maisel-gw.enst-bretagne.fr (maisel-gw.enst-bretagne.fr [192.44.76.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19B5B8FC16 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:25:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maisel-gw.enst-bretagne.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC1D019868 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:08:53 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at resel.fr Received: from maisel-gw.enst-bretagne.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercure.adm.maisel.enst-bretagne.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c1OwIxOdDnbn for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:08:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from girafe.maisel.enst-bretagne.fr (girafe.maisel.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr [172.23.206.119]) (Authenticated sender: fperrin) by maisel-gw.enst-bretagne.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F23961984A for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:08:47 +0100 (CET) Received: by girafe.maisel.enst-bretagne.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9CA0E1C0CE; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:10:46 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Fr=C3=A9d=C3=A9ric_Perrin?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Organization: =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9seau?= des =?utf-8?B?w4lsw6h2ZXM=?= Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:10:46 +0100 Message-ID: <87vd2xogi1.fsf@resel.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: new termcap entry for rxvt-unicode-256color X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:25:22 -0000 Hello, rxvt-unicode version 9.09 was released last month. It added support for 256 colors in the default configuration, and the default value of $TERM changed to rxvt-unicode-256color (from rxvt-unicode). This results in slightly incorrect colors, and some programs like vi(1) refuse to work. It is my understanding that I should update /usr/share/misc/termcap. The diff between rxvt-unicode and rxvt-unicode-256color seems rather short; on a Linux machine, I have : girafe:~% infocmp -d rxvt-unicode rxvt-unicode-256color comparing rxvt-unicode to rxvt-unicode-256color. comparing booleans. comparing numbers. colors: 88, 256. pairs: 7744, 32767. comparing strings. However, I don't how how to update the termcap file. From my understanding of the manpage, the following command should give me the necessary information : girafe:~% infocmp -C -u rxvt-unicode-256color rxvt-unicode rxvt-unicode-256color|rxvt-unicode terminal with 256 colors (X Window System):\ :tc=rxvt-unicode: As you see, their is no mention of the 256-color capabilities, this doesn't seem correct. How do I update the termcap file ? -- Fred From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 13 16:11:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7AA1106566B for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:11:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sterling@camdensoftware.com) Received: from wh2.interactivevillages.com (wh2.interactivevillages.com [75.125.250.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DB2D8FC17 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:11:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 174-21-106-20.tukw.qwest.net ([174.21.106.20] helo=_HOSTNAME_) by wh2.interactivevillages.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PSBnl-0004en-14 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:03:06 -0800 Received: by _HOSTNAME_ (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 13 Dec 2010 08:11:47 -0800 Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 08:11:47 -0800 From: Chip Camden To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101213161147.GB23305@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <87vd2xogi1.fsf@resel.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="IiVenqGWf+H9Y6IX" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87vd2xogi1.fsf@resel.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Company: Camden Software Consulting URL: http://camdensoftware.com X-PGP-Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xD6DBAF91 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - wh2.interactivevillages.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - camdensoftware.com Subject: Re: new termcap entry for rxvt-unicode-256color X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:11:52 -0000 --IiVenqGWf+H9Y6IX Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Quoth Fr=E9d=E9ric Perrin on Monday, 13 December 2010: > Hello, >=20 > rxvt-unicode version 9.09 was released last month. It added support for > 256 colors in the default configuration, and the default value of $TERM > changed to rxvt-unicode-256color (from rxvt-unicode). >=20 > This results in slightly incorrect colors, and some programs like vi(1) > refuse to work. It is my understanding that I should update > /usr/share/misc/termcap. The diff between rxvt-unicode and > rxvt-unicode-256color seems rather short; on a Linux machine, I have : >=20 > girafe:~% infocmp -d rxvt-unicode rxvt-unicode-256color > comparing rxvt-unicode to rxvt-unicode-256color. > comparing booleans. > comparing numbers. > colors: 88, 256. > pairs: 7744, 32767. > comparing strings. >=20 > However, I don't how how to update the termcap file. From my > understanding of the manpage, the following command should give me the > necessary information : >=20 > girafe:~% infocmp -C -u rxvt-unicode-256color rxvt-unicode > rxvt-unicode-256color|rxvt-unicode terminal with 256 colors (X Window Sys= tem):\ > :tc=3Drxvt-unicode: >=20 > As you see, their is no mention of the 256-color capabilities, this > doesn't seem correct. How do I update the termcap file ? >=20 > --=20 > Fred > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" Take a look at the termcap entry for rxvt-256color. It's actually based on rxvt-unicode. So I think that all you need to add is: rxvt-unicode-256color|rxvt-unicode with 256 colors:\ :tc=3Drxvt-256color: --=20 Sterling (Chip) Camden | sterling@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F http://camdensoftware.com | http://chipstips.com | http://chipsquips= .com --IiVenqGWf+H9Y6IX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNBkXDAAoJEIpckszW26+R1wgH/3f1gp9GXBMbghRGJVvblFbV 2m/y/xngrD2Yjy6f4b7UYyoUlO1btOxS8Zm8qwSmzbt3qUYZ0IRcSmC0diua+3i+ cjwr2GV+Dii2OFr0sjI0sb1tLBz41iH/36lB3Y2pSzqjoteB53oEOwv+R/VinPfu 2ODpl9wecsQtujycFoNh3EPQZ2FNsLQ6qRgfmpXuCXtWiwyHvoPnmFA1iIbMgoV7 Ps9DW4wbudk3N3l5XeAiy2eqeZu970Z3env+Ftdc9lgxCBJB5mZi8qq1tt6d3HZ+ 3OrivWS/ai3auN7lzzY8uZHokjJedzoY1yEKosN3PyFDRzJwadLcdPvX+5XnwpE= =I7td -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --IiVenqGWf+H9Y6IX-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 13 17:53:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51A4C10656C1 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 17:53:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8C358FC15 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 17:53:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so6115353wwf.31 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:53:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=+jpiLXw4jDEgkEKiwwz/k6HXWYlJnEEkDIWXlLDGTCQ=; b=XN4jDM9Et6Z1KJkmRRpculF7Ova24+u1ERpPVsxjn++MDzUfuvWM4HU+a5NCToD3q2 HOJVMSkBLMGB2vToGB9ZiQsMjUkZxGlnObpMdsYi8KTskvs+krRM/RnPEwAyoETn3mgu 4pphl8BzoI0GrkyMdPbgbujUkWCOta4bIV9gg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=xO+ygFoedobD/Pb4TUcnQarOaB8y32l8ClJ1j1qLllNVIDr79jBwc3BIQHih70LpzQ 4r2EphlGag5sCh+r3HHw+YhuBJ2kqpTuu/TdsbUseEKz9nI9KuFVDulC6JtmQySzwcdz 2oPNjEA5qJnegfD/pBppZZnw+e9e2AkKaa9y0= Received: by 10.227.157.205 with SMTP id c13mr1780672wbx.123.1292262830782; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:53:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from Abricot.malikania.fr (65.21.102-84.rev.gaoland.net [84.102.21.65]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 11sm4589169wbi.0.2010.12.13.09.53.48 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 13 Dec 2010 09:53:49 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D065DE0.2020509@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 18:54:40 +0100 From: David Demelier User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Unable to extract audio cd tracks X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 17:53:52 -0000 Hi, Reading this http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/creating-cds.html I would try to extract my files from my optical drive. (I don't have atapicam but if I understand well it's only needed for cdda2wav) markand@Abricot ~ $ sudo dd if=/dev/acd0t01 of=track1.cdr dd: /dev/acd0t01: Invalid argument 0+0 records in 0+0 records out 0 bytes transferred in 0.026221 secs (0 bytes/sec) do I really need atapicam even if I directly read from the device? Kind regards, From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 13 18:22:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F4C71065672 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 18:22:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marc@blackend.org) Received: from smtpfb2-g21.free.fr (smtpfb2-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05E408FC14 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 18:22:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp6-g21.free.fr (smtp6-g21.free.fr [212.27.42.6]) by smtpfb2-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEF71CA9607 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 19:04:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from gothic.blackend.org (unknown [88.179.1.53]) by smtp6-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 503F682359; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 19:04:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from gothic.blackend.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gothic.blackend.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBDI4bgp002411; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 19:04:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marc@gothic.blackend.org) Received: (from marc@localhost) by gothic.blackend.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oBDI4bNn002410; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 19:04:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from marc) Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 19:04:37 +0100 From: Marc Fonvieille To: David Demelier Message-ID: <20101213180437.GD1652@gothic.blackend.org> References: <4D065DE0.2020509@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D065DE0.2020509@gmail.com> X-Useless-Header: blackend.org X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unable to extract audio cd tracks X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 18:22:07 -0000 On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 06:54:40PM +0100, David Demelier wrote: > Hi, > > Reading this http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/creating-cds.html I > would try to extract my files from my optical drive. (I don't have > atapicam but if I understand well it's only needed for cdda2wav) > > markand@Abricot ~ $ sudo dd if=/dev/acd0t01 of=track1.cdr > dd: /dev/acd0t01: Invalid argument > 0+0 records in > 0+0 records out > 0 bytes transferred in 0.026221 secs (0 bytes/sec) > > do I really need atapicam even if I directly read from the device? > cdda2wav should work even without atapicam. The doc has to be updated on this point. However the dd thing should work maybe the disc was not correctly "tasted" by the drive. Try: dd if=/dev/acd0 of=/dev/null count=1 -- Marc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 13 22:01:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89C821065673 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 22:01:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dickey@saltmine.radix.net) Received: from saltmine.radix.net (saltmine.radix.net [207.192.128.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D8A48FC13 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 22:01:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from saltmine.radix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2) with ESMTP id oBDLhISa029168 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:43:18 -0500 (EST) Received: (from dickey@localhost) by saltmine.radix.net (8.12.2/8.12.2/Submit) id oBDLhHPI029167 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:43:17 -0500 (EST) Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:43:17 -0500 From: Thomas Dickey To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101213214317.GA28269@saltmine.radix.net> References: <87vd2xogi1.fsf@resel.fr> <20101213161147.GB23305@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101213161147.GB23305@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Subject: Re: new termcap entry for rxvt-unicode-256color X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 22:01:47 -0000 --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 08:11:47AM -0800, Chip Camden wrote: > Quoth Fr=E9d=E9ric Perrin on Monday, 13 December 2010: > > Hello, > >=20 > > rxvt-unicode version 9.09 was released last month. It added support for > > 256 colors in the default configuration, and the default value of $TERM > > changed to rxvt-unicode-256color (from rxvt-unicode). > >=20 > > This results in slightly incorrect colors, and some programs like vi(1) > > refuse to work. It is my understanding that I should update > > /usr/share/misc/termcap. The diff between rxvt-unicode and > > rxvt-unicode-256color seems rather short; on a Linux machine, I have : > >=20 > > girafe:~% infocmp -d rxvt-unicode rxvt-unicode-256color > > comparing rxvt-unicode to rxvt-unicode-256color. > > comparing booleans. > > comparing numbers. > > colors: 88, 256. > > pairs: 7744, 32767. > > comparing strings. > >=20 > > However, I don't how how to update the termcap file. From my > > understanding of the manpage, the following command should give me the > > necessary information : > >=20 > > girafe:~% infocmp -C -u rxvt-unicode-256color rxvt-unicode > > rxvt-unicode-256color|rxvt-unicode terminal with 256 colors (X Window S= ystem):\ > > :tc=3Drxvt-unicode: > >=20 > > As you see, their is no mention of the 256-color capabilities, this > > doesn't seem correct. How do I update the termcap file ? The 256-colors aren't shown since the corresponding terminfo expression doesn't map to termcap. (I added a workaround recently in ncurses to recognize this special case). For example xterm+256color|xterm 256-color feature:\ :cc:\ :Co#256:pa#32767:\ :AB=3D\E[48;5;%dm:AF=3D\E[38;5;%dm:Sb@:Sf@: --=20 Thomas E. Dickey http://invisible-island.net ftp://invisible-island.net --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (SunOS) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQFNBpNItIqByHxlDocRAg7wAJ9ITgX0jobUFbkyZA+6wxer1Tlo2wCfYVDg 7PyaekGHRQxBlsxPu9wkllI= =1aOI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 13 22:29:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 723B21065693 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 22:29:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 342218FC08 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 22:29:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-134-77.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.134.77]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B53301EA73; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:29:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id oBDMTHQn005124; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:29:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:29:17 +0100 From: Polytropon To: David Demelier Message-Id: <20101213232917.70fc36f6.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4D065DE0.2020509@gmail.com> References: <4D065DE0.2020509@gmail.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unable to extract audio cd tracks X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 22:29:20 -0000 On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 18:54:40 +0100, David Demelier wrote: > Hi, > > Reading this http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/creating-cds.html I > would try to extract my files from my optical drive. (I don't have > atapicam but if I understand well it's only needed for cdda2wav) > > markand@Abricot ~ $ sudo dd if=/dev/acd0t01 of=track1.cdr > dd: /dev/acd0t01: Invalid argument > 0+0 records in > 0+0 records out > 0 bytes transferred in 0.026221 secs (0 bytes/sec) > > do I really need atapicam even if I directly read from the device? You need to specify the correct block size: dd if=/dev/acd0t01 of=track01.cdr bs=2352 This should give you a cdr (raw) file conforming to the CD audio specifications. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 13 23:01:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B25BA1065674 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:01:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lobo@bsd.com.br) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75BCB8FC1C for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:01:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywp6 with SMTP id 6so1762ywp.13 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:01:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.109.168 with SMTP id s28mr9610072yhg.74.1292281304620; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:01:44 -0800 (PST) Received: from papi.localnet ([187.78.171.174]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 7sm4302451yhl.27.2010.12.13.15.01.42 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:01:43 -0800 (PST) From: Mario Lobo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 19:57:33 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.1-STABLE; KDE/4.5.2; amd64; ; ) X-KMail-Markup: true MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201012131957.33109.lobo@bsd.com.br> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Chinese FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:01:45 -0000 Hi; I know this is old news. http://blogs.techrepublic.com.com/security/?p=1682 I was just curious if anybody would have a clue on how they've hardened FBSD, either by just using its own resources or by hacking the code further. -- Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br FreeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 13 23:21:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A878106566C for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:21:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbiquez@intranet.com.mx) Received: from intranet.com.mx (intranet.com.mx [200.33.246.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 015798FC0A for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:21:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from PC2.intranet.com.mx (189.144.49.25) by intranet.com.mx with ESMTP (EIMS X 3.3.9) for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 17:22:56 -0600 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 17:21:06 -0600 To: FreeBSD From: Jorge Biquez Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Message-ID: <3375127378-437632400@intranet.com.mx> Subject: Kind of off topic. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:21:24 -0000 Hello all. A friend is asking me to help him to solve some problem he has in his servers. To some I would be able to connect using ssh, with other just it i snot possible. I remember that on the windows world there was a commercial software PCANywhere. He can have it but I am not sure if I would be able to connect to that from my Freebsd machine (of course not by ssh). What are you using for connecting to graphical interfaces of different OS's from FreeBSD? I tested some years ago a VNC software but did not work fine with MAC OSX (recently released by then). I know big security factors are involved for sure. Any suggestion on what to use, not to expensive or free? Thanks in advance Jorge Biquez From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 13 23:28:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 594E7106566C for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:28:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Ggatten@waddell.com) Received: from mailhost0.waddell.com (mailhost0.waddell.com [12.154.38.61]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F2028FC18 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:28:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from emlpfilt4.waddell.com (mailhost.waddell.com [10.1.10.26]) by mailhost0.waddell.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D2CD509E5; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 17:27:51 -0600 (CST) Received: from emlpfilt4.waddell.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 52E22578838; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 17:27:51 -0600 (CST) Received: from ADVPHTCAS0.wradvisors.com (advphtcas0.wradvisors.com [192.168.203.228]) by emlpfilt4.waddell.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BD6F578833; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 17:27:51 -0600 (CST) Received: from WADPMBXV0.waddell.com ([169.254.1.151]) by ADVPHTCAS0.wradvisors.com ([192.168.203.228]) with mapi; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 17:27:51 -0600 From: Gary Gatten To: 'Jorge Biquez' , FreeBSD Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 17:27:50 -0600 Thread-Topic: Kind of off topic. Thread-Index: AcubHJRFcx0QrXTVS8CurLZJUwwMfgAACL9g Message-ID: <18842_1292282871_4D06ABF7_18842_173_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499A7AF8ECA@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> References: <3375127378-437632400@intranet.com.mx> In-Reply-To: <3375127378-437632400@intranet.com.mx> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Subject: RE: Kind of off topic. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:28:02 -0000 Ssh not possible? That's one of the most basic "requirements" and most eas= y to secure - typically.... XWindows of course, or numerous variants thereof. I'm not sure but I *thin= k* most of them use the Xwindows protocol on the network. VNC may also work now. There are also several versions of it (TightVNC, Re= alVNC, et al) There's a native VNC protocol/client as well as Java/http - m= aybe https... There's probably someone that has written and httpd or Apache module that w= ill simply pass I/O between a shell process on the box. Maybe search the p= orts tree or of course google. G -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@f= reebsd.org] On Behalf Of Jorge Biquez Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 5:21 PM To: FreeBSD Subject: Kind of off topic. Hello all. A friend is asking me to help him to solve some problem he has in his=20 servers. To some I would be able to connect using ssh, with other=20 just it i snot possible. I remember that on the windows world there=20 was a commercial software PCANywhere. He can have it but I am not=20 sure if I would be able to connect to that from my Freebsd machine=20 (of course not by ssh). What are you using for connecting to graphical interfaces of=20 different OS's from FreeBSD? I tested some years ago a VNC software but did not work fine with MAC=20 OSX (recently released by then). I know big security factors are involved for sure. Any suggestion on what to use, not to expensive or free? Thanks in advance Jorge Biquez _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
"This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email from your system." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 13 23:35:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E9B4106564A for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:35:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbiquez@intranet.com.mx) Received: from intranet.com.mx (intranet.com.mx [200.33.246.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 286178FC14 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:35:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from PC2.intranet.com.mx (189.144.49.25) by intranet.com.mx with ESMTP (EIMS X 3.3.9) for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 17:36:38 -0600 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 17:34:57 -0600 To: FreeBSD From: Jorge Biquez In-Reply-To: <18842_1292282871_4D06ABF7_18842_173_1_D9B37353831173459FDA A836D3B43499A7AF8ECA@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> References: <3375127378-437632400@intranet.com.mx> <18842_1292282871_4D06ABF7_18842_173_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499A7AF8ECA@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Message-ID: <3375128198-437632411@intranet.com.mx> Subject: RE: Kind of off topic. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:35:04 -0000 Hello. SSH in some of the servers is acting and working BUT I am assuming some servers won't have it... like some windows based machines.... The Mac's have it but the idea isto have the graphical interface since the errors of the problems they are having are presenting in their graphical applications.... Thanks a lot for you time. I will try to find a VNC that can be used in possible in all. Jorge Biquez At 05:27 p.m. 13/12/2010, you wrote: >Ssh not possible? That's one of the most basic "requirements" and >most easy to secure - typically.... > >XWindows of course, or numerous variants thereof. I'm not sure but >I *think* most of them use the Xwindows protocol on the network. > >VNC may also work now. There are also several versions of it >(TightVNC, RealVNC, et al) There's a native VNC protocol/client as >well as Java/http - maybe https... > >There's probably someone that has written and httpd or Apache module >that will simply pass I/O between a shell process on the box. Maybe >search the ports tree or of course google. > >G > > >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Jorge Biquez >Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 5:21 PM >To: FreeBSD >Subject: Kind of off topic. > >Hello all. > >A friend is asking me to help him to solve some problem he has in his >servers. To some I would be able to connect using ssh, with other >just it i snot possible. I remember that on the windows world there >was a commercial software PCANywhere. He can have it but I am not >sure if I would be able to connect to that from my Freebsd machine >(of course not by ssh). >What are you using for connecting to graphical interfaces of >different OS's from FreeBSD? >I tested some years ago a VNC software but did not work fine with MAC >OSX (recently released by then). >I know big security factors are involved for sure. >Any suggestion on what to use, not to expensive or free? > >Thanks in advance >Jorge Biquez > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > >
>
>"This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient > and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. > If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that > any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email > and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by > return email and delete this email from your system." > > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 13 23:40:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99876106566C for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:40:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Ggatten@waddell.com) Received: from mailhost0.waddell.com (mailhost0.waddell.com [12.154.38.61]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CC0C8FC12 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:40:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from emlpfilt4.waddell.com (emlpfilt4.waddell.com [10.1.10.26]) by mailhost0.waddell.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA6F7509F1; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 17:40:20 -0600 (CST) Received: from emlpfilt4.waddell.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id C1FFB578838; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 17:40:20 -0600 (CST) Received: from WADPHTCAS0.waddell.com (wadphtcas0.waddell.com [192.168.203.229]) by emlpfilt4.waddell.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAD1C578833; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 17:40:20 -0600 (CST) Received: from WADPMBXV0.waddell.com ([169.254.1.151]) by WADPHTCAS0.waddell.com ([192.168.203.229]) with mapi; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 17:40:20 -0600 From: Gary Gatten To: 'Jorge Biquez' , FreeBSD Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 17:40:19 -0600 Thread-Topic: Kind of off topic. Thread-Index: AcubHnJn9nFnFy0gRLWlkMwQXEum1wAAFWlQ Message-ID: <18842_1292283620_4D06AEE4_18842_399_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499A7AF8ECD@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> References: <3375127378-437632400@intranet.com.mx> <18842_1292282871_4D06ABF7_18842_173_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499A7AF8ECA@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> <3375128198-437632411@intranet.com.mx> In-Reply-To: <3375128198-437632411@intranet.com.mx> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Subject: RE: Kind of off topic. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:40:26 -0000 Sorry, I thought all the servers were *nix. Ah... I think there is an ssh sevice for winblows - not 100% sure though. = Any errors that are visible in a GUI app "should" be able to be logged to = syslog, event logs, proprietary log file, etc... Guess that depends on the= app and the developer though! Good luck! -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@f= reebsd.org] On Behalf Of Jorge Biquez Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 5:35 PM To: FreeBSD Subject: RE: Kind of off topic. Hello. SSH in some of the servers is acting and working BUT I am assuming=20 some servers won't have it... like some windows based machines....=20 The Mac's have it but the idea isto have the graphical interface=20 since the errors of the problems they are having are presenting in=20 their graphical applications.... Thanks a lot for you time. I will try to find a VNC that can be used=20 in possible in all. Jorge Biquez At 05:27 p.m. 13/12/2010, you wrote: >Ssh not possible? That's one of the most basic "requirements" and=20 >most easy to secure - typically.... > >XWindows of course, or numerous variants thereof. I'm not sure but=20 >I *think* most of them use the Xwindows protocol on the network. > >VNC may also work now. There are also several versions of it=20 >(TightVNC, RealVNC, et al) There's a native VNC protocol/client as=20 >well as Java/http - maybe https... > >There's probably someone that has written and httpd or Apache module=20 >that will simply pass I/O between a shell process on the box. Maybe=20 >search the ports tree or of course google. > >G > > >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org=20 >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Jorge Biquez >Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 5:21 PM >To: FreeBSD >Subject: Kind of off topic. > >Hello all. > >A friend is asking me to help him to solve some problem he has in his >servers. To some I would be able to connect using ssh, with other >just it i snot possible. I remember that on the windows world there >was a commercial software PCANywhere. He can have it but I am not >sure if I would be able to connect to that from my Freebsd machine >(of course not by ssh). >What are you using for connecting to graphical interfaces of >different OS's from FreeBSD? >I tested some years ago a VNC software but did not work fine with MAC >OSX (recently released by then). >I know big security factors are involved for sure. >Any suggestion on what to use, not to expensive or free? > >Thanks in advance >Jorge Biquez > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g" > > > > > > >
2.25pt;padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in'> >
>"This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient > and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. > If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that > any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email > and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by > return email and delete this email from your system." > > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g" _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
"This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email from your system." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 13 23:40:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 478891065693 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:40:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@ifdnrg.com) Received: from outbound.ifdnrg.com (outbound.ifdnrg.com [193.200.98.138]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D82938FC12 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:40:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.67] (188-221-77-161.zone12.bethere.co.uk [188.221.77.161]) (authenticated bits=0) by outbound.ifdnrg.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBDNeTMs027356; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:40:31 GMT (envelope-from paul@ifdnrg.com) Message-ID: <4D06AEEA.8020004@ifdnrg.com> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:40:26 +0000 From: Paul Macdonald User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.2; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jorge Biquez References: <3375127378-437632400@intranet.com.mx> <18842_1292282871_4D06ABF7_18842_173_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499A7AF8ECA@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> <3375128198-437632411@intranet.com.mx> In-Reply-To: <3375128198-437632411@intranet.com.mx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Kind of off topic. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:40:34 -0000 On 13/12/2010 23:34, Jorge Biquez wrote: > Hello. > > SSH in some of the servers is acting and working BUT I am assuming > some servers won't have it... like some windows based machines.... The > Mac's have it but the idea isto have the graphical interface since the > errors of the problems they are having are presenting in their > graphical applications.... > > Thanks a lot for you time. I will try to find a VNC that can be used > in possible in all. > logmein.com is good for browser based secure/free graphical access to macs + windows.. Paul. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 13 23:41:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B35611065670 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:41:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE978FC22 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:41:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so16488wwf.31 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:41:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=EbLtPRW17GyV/SZD8aCliZxCjeQp8hoLjLtSGEC3dqw=; b=pkotm4JTkbDadPSLFhgmUHXS8HOgtvfjCSUBlVjSdmOv3h1RIEp6V6A1shwFNYEJu6 2hcbuTBgsBtR+XmBuejIqom2WAeUE8HZsxJBKpLOw0jG7FbHGGyEgmJek/rSFj9trh55 1lJDAiG4Y/IXBbz65LMGWdsYrswcsVMuESxoI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ml2q3QYty/TZXxvtrf40GFcJFaFKvdJpIoDhY+zxGc+7AkxlJgfBSBx8kl7ATwHAQt MxubdN7GXsKrwNAKEgD4KQW8uZl9Y2boMsm6xcW60d/Ihj28WgnrVmhVRz/FAgQ2QsIC RUNOx3spb2shDbhTvomX6nWVGjbWCI6iz+LTg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.52.143 with SMTP id e15mr261403wec.44.1292283696832; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:41:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.72.198 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:41:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <3375128198-437632411@intranet.com.mx> References: <3375127378-437632400@intranet.com.mx> <18842_1292282871_4D06ABF7_18842_173_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499A7AF8ECA@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> <3375128198-437632411@intranet.com.mx> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:41:36 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: Jorge Biquez Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Kind of off topic. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:41:38 -0000 On 13 December 2010 23:34, Jorge Biquez wrote: > Hello. > > SSH in some of the servers is acting and working BUT I am assuming some > servers won't have it... like some windows based machines.... The Mac's have > it but the idea isto have the graphical interface since the errors of the > problems they are having are presenting in their graphical applications.... > > Thanks a lot for you time. I will try to find a VNC that can be used in > possible in all. > > Jorge Biquez > > > At 05:27 p.m. 13/12/2010, you wrote: > >> Ssh not possible? That's one of the most basic "requirements" and most >> easy to secure - typically.... >> >> XWindows of course, or numerous variants thereof. I'm not sure but I >> *think* most of them use the Xwindows protocol on the network. >> >> VNC may also work now. There are also several versions of it (TightVNC, >> RealVNC, et al) There's a native VNC protocol/client as well as Java/http - >> maybe https... >> >> There's probably someone that has written and httpd or Apache module that >> will simply pass I/O between a shell process on the box. Maybe search the >> ports tree or of course google. >> >> G >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto: >> owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Jorge Biquez >> Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 5:21 PM >> To: FreeBSD >> Subject: Kind of off topic. >> >> Hello all. >> >> A friend is asking me to help him to solve some problem he has in his >> servers. To some I would be able to connect using ssh, with other >> just it i snot possible. I remember that on the windows world there >> was a commercial software PCANywhere. He can have it but I am not >> sure if I would be able to connect to that from my Freebsd machine >> (of course not by ssh). >> What are you using for connecting to graphical interfaces of >> different OS's from FreeBSD? >> I tested some years ago a VNC software but did not work fine with MAC >> OSX (recently released by then). >> I know big security factors are involved for sure. >> Any suggestion on what to use, not to expensive or free? >> >> Thanks in advance >> Jorge Biquez >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
>>
>> "This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient >> and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. >> If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that >> any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email >> and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited. If you have >> received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by >> return email and delete this email from your system." >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > vnc works on most os's and can be tunneled over ssh. opensshd works on most os's (including windows) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 13 23:42:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 081CA1065695 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:42:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F7B78FC1F for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:42:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so17099wwf.31 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:42:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=f1x4JI7bJHmFjGLHBPmjJN/61nkzFxK+N6/imJxdHR8=; b=huVal64f3Vk+xKVeDD0AmHvPNJkv6CFdAHT0MZIVyTSjXjnPrn9TDDFNBTOwTvm2Lr zD4JMJxrYYWpr0kcvRiYEJ22AZNOkt7dcFj63XOIYfrouldg8SMVdc5CmETIT7Fq47FA u+GPMMSUKyF1MI8ll8GLBc1KfwJ2HGH3PcJTQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ul8CglsR5HB01BWEQAgEnuumWguB1oVpWm4U9tbojXrA/EXTYdxSEU91jA3zqf3oii dNuKNJ357T/9l1LbzxxrrRLRnozUmLU4pqEbo4pVG3DaT/zflfQYBAMsljV62Vk7KFJU 6l/oQVB2lAxfbrFlbu4MUotms+a9gpPqkAQGk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.177.8 with SMTP id c8mr5301159wem.59.1292283768488; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:42:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.72.198 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 15:42:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D06AEEA.8020004@ifdnrg.com> References: <3375127378-437632400@intranet.com.mx> <18842_1292282871_4D06ABF7_18842_173_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499A7AF8ECA@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> <3375128198-437632411@intranet.com.mx> <4D06AEEA.8020004@ifdnrg.com> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:42:48 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: Paul Macdonald Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Jorge Biquez , FreeBSD Subject: Re: Kind of off topic. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 23:42:50 -0000 On 13 December 2010 23:40, Paul Macdonald wrote: > > On 13/12/2010 23:34, Jorge Biquez wrote: > >> Hello. >> >> SSH in some of the servers is acting and working BUT I am assuming some >> servers won't have it... like some windows based machines.... The Mac's have >> it but the idea isto have the graphical interface since the errors of the >> problems they are having are presenting in their graphical applications.... >> >> Thanks a lot for you time. I will try to find a VNC that can be used in >> possible in all. >> >> logmein.com is good for browser based secure/free graphical access to > macs + windows.. > Paul. > > _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > trusting a 3rd part like that gives me cold shivers From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 03:28:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDC4A106566C for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 03:28:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65FED8FC0C for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 03:28:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBE3SWx1084020; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 20:28:32 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id oBE3SWo9084017; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 20:28:32 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 20:28:32 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Jorge Biquez In-Reply-To: <3375127378-437632400@intranet.com.mx> Message-ID: References: <3375127378-437632400@intranet.com.mx> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 13 Dec 2010 20:28:32 -0700 (MST) Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Kind of off topic. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 03:28:33 -0000 On Mon, 13 Dec 2010, Jorge Biquez wrote: > A friend is asking me to help him to solve some problem he has in his > servers. To some I would be able to connect using ssh, with other just it i > snot possible. I remember that on the windows world there was a commercial > software PCANywhere. He can have it but I am not sure if I would be able to > connect to that from my Freebsd machine (of course not by ssh). > What are you using for connecting to graphical interfaces of different OS's > from FreeBSD? > I tested some years ago a VNC software but did not work fine with MAC OSX > (recently released by then). > I know big security factors are involved for sure. > Any suggestion on what to use, not to expensive or free? net/ssvnc works with both UltraVNC Windows clients and net/x11vnc for FreeBSD. It can communicate over an encrypted SSL tunnel. The client can initiate an outgoing connection, so outside holes don't need to poked through the firewall. Haven't needed to try it on a Mac, but Karl Runge's web page (http://www.karlrunge.com/x11vnc/ssvnc.html) lists MacOSX support. This has worked well for me on high-bandwidth connections. Dialup has been unusable, and I suspect it would have to forgo encryption to be usable, if then. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 03:59:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D8B8106564A for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 03:59:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f49.google.com (mail-fx0-f49.google.com [209.85.161.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3E608FC12 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 03:59:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm19 with SMTP id 19so211740fxm.36 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 19:59:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=gN8UCd8ojzwfB6foY7R1BuRniSjOsK+XiicHxe1gHCI=; b=MVFXYP5V/80C7nGGb9xIn75c2IBNAC6rm8rPfl+49I+rjGSVcvZurARtno2BXWYRI4 sxO+1S0mhp2msnl6qOa1hdlHIXgFmQRcGQjaO4f0so6ROEBYXez897Ics+4vEgOjDrVd 7Tk0I/WYxq+k7coDHjf31S86vomW9iWyX0slA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=JwzKCeoQMS/SnE0VFlzCjstY8erDdKh68xt1Klx2GgPtsIl6DBfS08Y2Xyi8Z1Kfc1 CQ4oXjIm8+rUWo247fyv+YA4JCQPkEfmlUIxc4mQhStD6aJwbKSS3DpQ7SBvDI96HYh7 P4YG9lsxrWuQFP/g5daIz8EnRsofyIRvXtcxA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.96.195 with SMTP id i3mr3875454fan.32.1292299184530; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 19:59:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.114.4 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Dec 2010 19:59:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <3375127378-437632400@intranet.com.mx> References: <3375127378-437632400@intranet.com.mx> Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 21:59:44 -0600 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Jorge Biquez Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Kind of off topic. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 03:59:47 -0000 On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Jorge Biquez wrote: > Hello all. > > A friend is asking me to help him to solve some problem he has in his > servers. To some I would be able to connect using ssh, with other just it i > snot possible. I remember that on the windows world there was a commercial > software PCANywhere. He can have it but I am not sure if I would be able to > connect to that from my Freebsd machine (of course not by ssh). > What are you using for connecting to graphical interfaces of different OS's > from FreeBSD? > I tested some years ago a VNC software but did not work fine with MAC OSX > (recently released by then). > I know big security factors are involved for sure. > Any suggestion on what to use, not to expensive or free? > If you're connecting to Windows clients, use RDP, not VNC. /usr/ports/net/rdesktop /usr/ports/net/freerdp To X11 and other type clients, VNC. You can use /usr/ports/net/freenx and /usr/ports/net/linux-nx-client/ for a better experience although I haven't gotten that portion working under FreeBSD before. Once it's setup though it's way faster than an equal bandwidth/setttings RDP connection. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 08:12:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3AFD1065903 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 08:12:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@boosten.org) Received: from smtpq2.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq2.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.34.165]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 749D08FC17 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 08:12:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.54.34.145] (helo=smtp14.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq2.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PSQ07-0002c6-Vc for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 09:12:47 +0100 Received: from 541980a1.cm-5-2c.dynamic.ziggo.nl ([84.25.128.161] helo=ra.egypt.nl) by smtp14.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PSPzw-0007qh-Ci for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 09:12:36 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (xp.egypt.nl [192.168.13.35]) by ra.egypt.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0CC139856 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 09:12:35 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4D0726F2.6070703@boosten.org> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 09:12:34 +0100 From: Peter Boosten User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Questions X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-ID: 1PSPzw-0007qh-Ci X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-SpamCheck: geen spam, SpamAssassin (niet cached, score=-2.523, vereist 5, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -2.60, SPF_PASS -0.00, TW_AQ 0.08) X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-From: peter@boosten.org X-Spam-Status: No Subject: Updating glib from 2.24.2 to 2.26.1_1 fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 08:12:50 -0000 Hi all, In an attempt to update glib on my 8.0-machine, portupgrade stops with this message: **** gnome-libtool: compile: cc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I.. -DG_LOG_DOMAIN=\"GLib-GIO\" -I.. -I../glib -I../glib -I.. -I../gmodule -DG_DISABLE_CAST_CHECKS -DG_THREADS_MANDATORY -DG_DISABLE_DEPRECATED -DGIO_COMPILATION -DGIO_MODULE_DIR=\"/usr/local/lib/gio/modules\" -I/usr/local/include -DG_DISABLE_SINGLE_INCLUDES -D_REENTRANT -O -pipe -march=pentiumpro -Wall -MT gzlibcompressor.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/gzlibcompressor.Tpo -c gzlibcompressor.c -fPIC -DPIC -o .libs/gzlibcompressor.o gzlibcompressor.c:68: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before 'gz_header' gzlibcompressor.c: In function 'g_zlib_compressor_set_gzheader': gzlibcompressor.c:80: error: 'GZlibCompressor' has no member named 'file_info' gzlibcompressor.c:83: error: 'GZlibCompressor' has no member named 'gzheader' gzlibcompressor.c:83: error: 'gz_header' undeclared (first use in this function) gzlibcompressor.c:83: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once gzlibcompressor.c:83: error: for each function it appears in.) gzlibcompressor.c:84: error: 'GZlibCompressor' has no member named 'gzheader' gzlibcompressor.c:86: error: 'GZlibCompressor' has no member named 'file_info' gzlibcompressor.c:87: error: 'GZlibCompressor' has no member named 'gzheader' gzlibcompressor.c:88: error: 'GZlibCompressor' has no member named 'gzheader' gzlibcompressor.c:90: error: 'GZlibCompressor' has no member named 'gzheader' gzlibcompressor.c:91: error: 'GZlibCompressor' has no member named 'file_info' gzlibcompressor.c:94: warning: implicit declaration of function 'deflateSetHeader' gzlibcompressor.c:94: error: 'GZlibCompressor' has no member named 'gzheader' gzlibcompressor.c: In function 'g_zlib_compressor_finalize': gzlibcompressor.c:112: error: 'GZlibCompressor' has no member named 'file_info' gzlibcompressor.c:113: error: 'GZlibCompressor' has no member named 'file_info' gzlibcompressor.c: In function 'g_zlib_compressor_get_property': gzlibcompressor.c:171: error: 'GZlibCompressor' has no member named 'file_info' gzlibcompressor.c: In function 'g_zlib_compressor_get_file_info': gzlibcompressor.c:310: error: 'GZlibCompressor' has no member named 'file_info' gzlibcompressor.c: In function 'g_zlib_compressor_set_file_info': gzlibcompressor.c:335: error: 'GZlibCompressor' has no member named 'file_info' gzlibcompressor.c:338: error: 'GZlibCompressor' has no member named 'file_info' gzlibcompressor.c:339: error: 'GZlibCompressor' has no member named 'file_info' gzlibcompressor.c:342: error: 'GZlibCompressor' has no member named 'file_info' gmake[4]: *** [gzlibcompressor.lo] Error 1 gmake[4]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/devel/glib20/work/glib-2.26.1/gio' gmake[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/devel/glib20/work/glib-2.26.1/gio' gmake[2]: *** [all] Error 2 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/devel/glib20/work/glib-2.26.1/gio' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/devel/glib20/work/glib-2.26.1' gmake: *** [all] Error 2 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/glib20. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/glib20. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/portupgrade20101213-34478-1rabaqj-0 env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade UPGRADE_PORT=glib-2.24.2 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=2.24.2 make ** Fix the problem and try again. ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) ! devel/glib20 (glib-2.24.2) (compiler error) **** Anyone know how to solve this issue? TIA -- http://www.boosten.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 08:22:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE6E31065D8C for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 08:22:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antarex@land.ru) Received: from mail3.ks.pochta.ru (mail3.ks.pochta.ru [62.141.94.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93D2D8FC15 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 08:22:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=land.ru; s=dkim; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Subject:To:MIME-Version:From:Date:Message-ID; bh=grHYzJvx/MW2j/EdwnDGX9xADqceKCBqpUoa0sLSZRE=; b=Gh6yr/driUAVYWzIHmqFpRJy/MUaANfufKMM1cc7bP3N5N0/ad11MR9o4sLNy+SU7tR1fptbYy+AyMi+v8Krn2AVS4YHAxGO1vgFWw5IwdGPt1PrCkIKgNSGP0oI7ZRG; Received: from [193.33.26.11] (port=15902 helo=antanix.localdomain) by mail3.ks.pochta.ru with esmtpa id 1PSQ9v-0001Qp-Qd; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 11:22:55 +0300 Message-ID: <4D07295A.2070203@land.ru> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 13:22:50 +0500 From: Dmitry Postolov User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101129 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, bruce@cran.org.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-NoSpam-Exim-Host: 62.141.94.133 X-NoSpam-Exim-Port: 8092 X-NoSpam-Exim-Scanned: Yes X-NoSpam-Exim-Result: OK Cc: Subject: PR 152892: Not updating /etc files in installer FreeBSD-8.2-BETA1-i386-memstick.img X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 08:22:58 -0000 Hi to All! Sorry for my bad English... PR 152892: Not updating /etc files in installer FreeBSD-8.2-BETA1-i386-memstick.img This problem is observed in mode: Custom/All distributions. In mode: Standard/Developer or Kernel Developer installation completed successfully! --- http://wiki.freebsd.org/Releng/8.2TODO Quote: After BETA1: 20101209 - Unbreak sysinstall ALL distributions installation (BruceCran) (r216243, merged as r216325) --- Whether it means, what everything is all right? best regards, Dmitry Postolov antarex@land.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 09:09:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDE5710669B2 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 09:09:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68EC98FC17 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 09:09:13 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Status: No X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-1.001, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00, BAYES_40 -0.00) X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-ID: oBE98sD5000496 Received: from gkeramidas-glaptop.linux.gr ([74.125.57.36]) (authenticated bits=0) by igloo.linux.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id oBE98sD5000496 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 14 Dec 2010 11:09:02 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Jorge Biquez References: <3375127378-437632400@intranet.com.mx> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 10:08:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: <3375127378-437632400@intranet.com.mx> (Jorge Biquez's message of "Mon, 13 Dec 2010 17:21:06 -0600") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kind of off topic. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 09:09:14 -0000 On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 17:21:06 -0600, Jorge Biquez wrote: > Hello all. > > A friend is asking me to help him to solve some problem he has in his > servers. To some I would be able to connect using ssh, with other just > it i snot possible. I remember that on the windows world there was a > commercial software PCANywhere. He can have it but I am not sure if I > would be able to connect to that from my Freebsd machine (of course > not by ssh). > > What are you using for connecting to graphical interfaces of different > OS's from FreeBSD? > > I tested some years ago a VNC software but did not work fine with MAC > OSX (recently released by then). > > I know big security factors are involved for sure. > Any suggestion on what to use, not to expensive or free? If the remote hosts are running FreeBSD, you can do almost *everything* through SSH. For example most of my FreeBSD-related testing work happens through SSH connections to virtual machines these days. If you really need to run a GUI application though there are a few options: - The most basic is to connect to the remote machine in *some* way, set the DISPLAY environment variable to point to a local X server that may accept incoming connections and fire up your GUI program. - You can SSH into the remote machine and use the -X or -Y options to set up 'X forwarding' back to the machine where the SSH connection has originated from. - You can use programs like the NX tools to set up a 'remotely accessible X desktop' on the target machine and then use nxclient to connect to it from anywhere. The fastest and simplest method is still a plain good old SSH connection though. It requires minimal setup (an sshd daemon on the remote side), it is accessible from anywhere in the world, it's secure against random eavesdroppers, it's fast to connect to, it's pretty light-weight on both the client and server systems, and you can do _everything_ on the remote host [even full system upgrades from source]. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 09:54:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8729A106856B for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 09:54:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vic@yeaguy.com) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.125]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45A238FC13 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 09:54:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=NFUeGz0loTdi/T6hXKngYYtckjed7x3pKvNOqmBBK18= c=1 sm=0 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=uRK6ZUxDawFwC8+94ldQlg==:17 a=iOhrDboYAAAA:8 a=1XWaLZrsAAAA:8 a=ZJjxc0SMAAAA:8 a=85N1-lAfAAAA:8 a=Oc2gPFgECtc09avF-PkA:9 a=XTn3CEGqrX2ER-EvjJcA:7 a=bRu7QHie5GPNjEpVu9PaJwnLkRkA:4 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=pZnKPkZR_lIA:10 a=u6pmmePcEMEA:10 a=xuOyKSTLVHYA:10 a=-_C46MR6lL4A:10 a=RblensgfJCF6jgvC:21 a=967ARYIZbm86G-NS:21 a=uRK6ZUxDawFwC8+94ldQlg==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 66.27.133.231 Received: from [66.27.133.231] ([66.27.133.231:18366] helo=[192.168.1.169]) by hrndva-oedge04.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id E1/8F-12606-2EE370D4; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 09:54:43 +0000 Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 01:54:26 -0800 (PST) From: "Justin V." To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Subject: pls help.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 09:54:44 -0000 Hi, I am having a very difficult time understanding what is going on with this FreeBSD machine.. I was having inet trouble so i put in a new router on my network (home network).. I have a FreeBSD machine on my network: FreeBSD yeaguy.com 8.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE #3: Thu Nov 4 20:43:41 PDT 2010 vic@yeaguy.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HBCA i386 I have windows machines on my network.. One of my windows machines is my laptop and I connect directly to the router via WIFI without any trouble at all... I can browse any website without complaint. My FreeBSD system connects to my WIFI router just fine as well.. I am seeing troubles browsing the inet with my FreeBSD machine (Xorg and opera) Pulling up Google.com can take up to 30s.. My Other windows machine is using the FreeBSD as its gateway, I am running ipnat. This pc suffers from the same issues as the FreeBSD box.. I configured the new router with the same ssid and wepkey.. so minimal adjustments would have to be made for other WIFI users in the house.. Everyone is fine except me... My server is fine as far as my Website is concerned.. I changed my DNS with my host to point to my new WAN IP.. I can pull my page fine.. I can ssh to my server fine from my phone, phones ip is from my Phones netowrk.. this is not being done via WIFI on my phone.. So my Nat'd WIN PC and my FreeBSD Xorg cannot browse the internet like it used to.. 30s to 40s to pull up google is just unacceptable, when I have my laptop sitting here using the same WIFI router pulling it up in about 3ms... Another odd symptom I am seeing is that when i issue the command 'alpine' to check my email, it hangs for a good 30s.... So in my mind, Im thinking, what changed?? My router and my Public IP.. thats it.. its almost like I have my OLD WAN ip hardcoded somewhere causing a conflict.. I cannot find it hardcoded anywhere.. Heres an example of what im seeing: [vic@yeaguy ~]$ ping google.com PING google.com (72.14.204.147): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 72.14.204.147: icmp_seq=0 ttl=52 time=85.460 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.204.147: icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=85.152 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.204.147: icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=84.048 ms 64 bytes from 72.14.204.147: icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=82.442 ms ^C --- google.com ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 82.442/84.275/85.460/1.182 ms [vic@yeaguy ~]$ telnet google.com 80 Trying 72.14.204.147... Connected to google.com. Escape character is '^]'. ^] telnet> q Connection closed. [vic@yeaguy ~]$ I am unable to browse to nytimes.com via FreeBSD Opera browser or WIN PC that is using the FreeBSD as the gateway, but I can telnet to it on tcp port 80 just fine.. [vic@yeaguy ~]$ telnet nytimes.com 80 Trying 199.239.136.200... Connected to nytimes.com. Escape character is '^]'. get Bad request

Bad request

Your browser sent a query this server could not understand. Connection closed by foreign host. [vic@yeaguy ~]$ Heres some config files: [vic@yeaguy ~]$ cat /etc/rc.conf wlans_rum0="wlan0" gateway_enable="YES" ifconfig_wlan0="inet 192.168.1.169 netmask 255.255.255.0 ssid vicnet wepmode on weptxkey 1 wepkey 1:0xF4AE43E9BA description WIFI" defaultrouter="192.168.1.1" apache22_enable="YES" hald_enable="YES" dbus_enable="YES" samba_enable="YES" nmbd_enable="YES" smbd_enable="YES" winbindd_enable="YES" hostname="yeaguy.com" ifconfig_em0="inet 10.1.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 10.1.1.255 description LAN" inetd_enable="YES" linux_enable="YES" sshd_enable="YES" usbd_enable="YES" postfix_enable="YES" sendmail_enable="NO" sendmail_submit_enable="NO" sendmail_outbound_enable="NO" sendmail_msp_queue_enable="NO" firewall_enable="YES" firewall_script="/etc/fire" ipnat_enable="YES" ipnat_program="/sbin/ipnat" ipnat_rules="/etc/ipnat.rules" ipnat_flags="" #ipmon_enable="YES" #ipmon_program="/sbin/ipmon" #ipmon_flags="-Ds" named_enable="YES" ntpdate_enable="YES" ntpdate_program="ntpdate" ntpdate_flags="-b 0.north-america.pool.ntp.org" mysql_enable="YES" clamav_clamd_enable="YES" clamav_freshclam_enable="YES" amavisd_enable="YES" #amavisd_ram="512m" pf_enable="YES" pf_rules="/etc/pf.conf" pflog_enable="YES" saver="daemon" [vic@yeaguy ~]$ ifconfig em0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 description: LAN options=219b ether 00:16:76:bf:17:29 inet 10.1.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.1.1.255 media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) status: active ipfw0: flags=8801 metric 0 mtu 65536 pflog0: flags=141 metric 0 mtu 33200 lo0: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 options=3 inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4 inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 nd6 options=3 pfsync0: flags=0<> metric 0 mtu 1460 syncpeer: 224.0.0.240 maxupd: 128 rum0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 2290 ether 00:1e:e5:a8:bd:5a media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect mode 11g status: associated wlan0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 description: WIFI ether 00:1e:e5:a8:bd:5a inet 192.168.1.169 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet OFDM/18Mbps mode 11g status: associated ssid vicnet channel 11 (2462 MHz 11g) bssid 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 country US authmode OPEN privacy ON deftxkey 1 wepkey 1:40-bit txpower 0 bmiss 7 scanvalid 60 bgscan bgscanintvl 300 bgscanidle 250 roam:rssi 7 roam:rate 5 protmode CTS [vic@yeaguy ~]$ [vic@yeaguy ~]$ netstat -rn Routing tables Internet: Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire default 192.168.1.1 UGS 1 2208 wlan0 10.1.1.0/24 link#1 U 4 16001 em0 10.1.1.1 link#1 UHS 0 0 lo0 127.0.0.1 link#4 UH 0 36 lo0 192.168.1.0/24 link#7 U 6 7123 wlan0 192.168.1.169 link#7 UHS 0 0 lo0 Internet6: Destination Gateway Flags Netif Expire ::1 ::1 UH lo0 fe80::%lo0/64 link#4 U lo0 fe80::1%lo0 link#4 UHS lo0 ff01:4::/32 fe80::1%lo0 U lo0 ff02::%lo0/32 fe80::1%lo0 U lo0 [vic@yeaguy ~]$ yeaguy# ipnat -l List of active MAP/Redirect filters: map wlan0 10.1.1.0/24 -> 192.168.1.169/32 portmap tcp/udp 10000:60000 map wlan0 10.1.1.0/24 -> 192.168.1.169/32 List of active sessions: MAP 10.1.1.190 53867 <- -> 192.168.1.169 54939 [69.147.83.34 80] MAP 10.1.1.190 53401 <- -> 192.168.1.169 45879 [72.14.204.147 80] MAP 10.1.1.190 53398 <- -> 192.168.1.169 18541 [72.14.204.147 80] MAP 10.1.1.190 53397 <- -> 192.168.1.169 27460 [72.14.204.147 80] yeaguy# I am thinking of doing a fresh install to see if my issue clears.. I am beyond frustrated.. A WAN IP and router change and now I have some odd tick/hangup on the system???!!! that makes no sense.. if i put the old router in place it works fine.. I really dont want to use the old router either,, it requires a reboot daily.. it flakey... I checked the router for ACLs and anything that might cause conflict but I am not seeing anything.. I really cant see how its the new router.. my WIN LAPTOP when connecting to the router works flawlessly... The only odd thing I do see in regards to the router and FreeBSD box is the WEP attributes: ifconfig shows: wepkey 1:40-bit // Router shows: WEP Encryption: "64 bits 10 hex digits".. is that an issue?? Router is a Linksys WRT54G2... My router logs show in and out traffic from the FreeBSD box.. so this is why Im thinking its the FreeBSD box... Can i do a system wide grep on all files to see if i find the OLD WAN IP hardcoded somewhere??? I have completely disable ipfw as well: yeaguy# ipfw -q flush yeaguy# ipfw show 65535 4145 3401628 allow ip from any to any If anyone can assist Id be very greatful.. Thanks Justin V. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 11:38:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23876106576C for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 11:38:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stageline@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com (mail-gx0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6EBF8FC1A for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 11:38:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk28 with SMTP id 28so440726gxk.17 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 03:38:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=aF11Of0PezFQvV5Gr9qWANw8QfMWrnvFMUD/EMYXeTs=; b=ZnyD2paF1lTZXC/DyWJYXHyxuTl/oSvgz76glpq67gvya0SsK1+dtosexcBWTp+diy 86d/93EJAR1xiTE050Q+jLXa5ASJW/VsH7cC/W1r/L5J50ncAYJj4psnb0H5qr0/Fcyq 0PkJiX3VbNZEpuFU8GlrpSBVJEk+4mf4C1Vi0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=P+4+qpRlSdsGlIwgkZBc2zRcGwayDIZvAqsu92xUkDOAxyoGItQr8BGfeOs6hCMDAb EAvkhWY3LcJ3AmjL/Y2vJDSo8hVQikS/Wg+dy2fFby5YuWy27+3FJ8OVXlupJqbEnthf l8yn0ewKhFOfXZqdONO9nPY5f5dtgEooqPvd8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.152.6 with SMTP id z6mr3444348and.90.1292326724622; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 03:38:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.100.240.12 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 03:38:44 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:38:44 +0100 Message-ID: From: Gabor Illo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: bge0: watchdog timeout broadcom 8.1 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 11:38:49 -0000 Somebody know how to fix this driver problem? Dec 14 12:10:38 mouseoleum kernel: bge0: watchdog timeout -- resetting Dec 14 12:10:38 mouseoleum kernel: bge0: link state changed to DOWN Dec 14 12:10:42 mouseoleum kernel: bge0: link state changed to UP Dec 14 12:13:33 mouseoleum kernel: bge0: watchdog timeout -- resetting Dec 14 12:13:33 mouseoleum kernel: bge0: link state changed to DOWN Dec 14 12:13:37 mouseoleum kernel: bge0: link state changed to UP thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 11:57:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 013C1106566C for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 11:57:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mubeeshalivm@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f49.google.com (mail-bw0-f49.google.com [209.85.214.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 751FF8FC0A for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 11:57:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so716650bwz.8 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 03:57:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=N1RoTMhjwW9uSGM1vX+SoUgswIGdCMyV1z11zJZaq8o=; b=ol2rA/KbcZ4at80eBoBnLropUJYwAWfyEdqCSejO25S30f+eQ/xMmv74R+pAQbMCil Y5UzgzBk3wGtInnCoBDowUnjD/YGm4lnNDJ7av1IT6ohSutdPCRpV8nvNuSo603tMol7 zaO3pYRMZQSxJePVpVDT+m3ENI7BObaeBuOtw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=shNxI9ai9PnBF8D5UnsTuim+ShaW7LbGiwHn3+NI3/VAk+tDJuoSSP+VQgybagjSYN HP7LxFdf8TENwUT7rsAQYl7TEJLcGrFuNoKQ+fRexruHf5jLF/NmKXRh49ORTK4outOh 748GDhjSDUEOXur4v9WmX6Gx4l1YbXom17Ta8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.65.135 with SMTP id j7mr5040346bki.85.1292327868397; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 03:57:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.101.197 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 03:57:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:27:48 +0530 Message-ID: From: Mubeesh ali To: "Justin V." Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pls help.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 11:57:51 -0000 try traceroute to check how packets are going out. do u have any proxy hardcoded in browser in bsd ? On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Justin V. wrote: > Hi, > > I am having a very difficult time understanding what is going on with thi= s > FreeBSD machine.. > > I was having inet trouble so i put in a new router on my network (home > network).. > > I have a FreeBSD machine on my network: > > FreeBSD yeaguy.com 8.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE #3: Thu Nov =A04 20:43= :41 > PDT 2010 =A0 =A0 vic@yeaguy.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HBCA =A0i386 > > > I have windows machines on my network.. > > > One of my windows machines is my laptop and I connect directly to the rou= ter > via WIFI without any trouble at all... =A0I can browse any website withou= t > complaint. > > My FreeBSD system connects to my WIFI router just fine as well.. =A0I am > seeing troubles browsing the inet with my FreeBSD machine (Xorg and opera= ) > Pulling up Google.com can take up to 30s.. > > My Other windows machine is using the FreeBSD as its gateway, I am runnin= g > ipnat. This pc suffers from the same issues as the FreeBSD box.. > > I configured the new router with the same ssid and wepkey.. so minimal > adjustments would have to be made for other WIFI users in the house.. > Everyone is fine except me... > > My server is fine as far as my Website is concerned.. I changed my DNS wi= th > my host to point to my new WAN IP.. I can pull my page fine.. I can ssh t= o > my server fine from my phone, phones ip is from my Phones netowrk.. this = is > not being done via WIFI on my phone.. > > So my Nat'd WIN PC and my FreeBSD Xorg cannot browse the internet like it > used to.. 30s to 40s to pull up google is just unacceptable, when I have = my > laptop sitting here using the same WIFI router pulling it up in about 3ms= ... > > Another odd symptom I am seeing is that when i issue the command 'alpine'= to > check my email, it hangs for a good 30s.... =A0So in my mind, Im thinking= , > what changed?? My router and my Public IP.. thats it.. its almost like I > have my OLD WAN ip hardcoded somewhere causing a conflict.. I cannot find= it > hardcoded anywhere.. > > Heres an example of what im seeing: > > [vic@yeaguy ~]$ ping google.com > PING google.com (72.14.204.147): 56 data bytes > 64 bytes from 72.14.204.147: icmp_seq=3D0 ttl=3D52 time=3D85.460 ms > 64 bytes from 72.14.204.147: icmp_seq=3D1 ttl=3D52 time=3D85.152 ms > 64 bytes from 72.14.204.147: icmp_seq=3D2 ttl=3D52 time=3D84.048 ms > 64 bytes from 72.14.204.147: icmp_seq=3D3 ttl=3D52 time=3D82.442 ms > ^C > --- google.com ping statistics --- > 4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss > round-trip min/avg/max/stddev =3D 82.442/84.275/85.460/1.182 ms > > > [vic@yeaguy ~]$ telnet google.com 80 > Trying 72.14.204.147... > Connected to google.com. =A0 > Escape character is '^]'. > ^] > telnet> q > Connection closed. > [vic@yeaguy ~]$ > > > I am unable to browse to nytimes.com via FreeBSD Opera browser or WIN PC > that is using the FreeBSD as the gateway, but I can telnet to it on tcp p= ort > 80 just fine.. > > [vic@yeaguy ~]$ telnet nytimes.com 80 > Trying 199.239.136.200... > Connected to nytimes.com. > Escape character is '^]'. > get > Bad request >

Bad request

> Your browser sent a query this server could not understand. > Connection closed by foreign host. > [vic@yeaguy ~]$ > > > Heres some config files: > > > [vic@yeaguy ~]$ cat /etc/rc.conf > wlans_rum0=3D"wlan0" > gateway_enable=3D"YES" > ifconfig_wlan0=3D"inet 192.168.1.169 netmask 255.255.255.0 ssid vicnet we= pmode > on weptxkey 1 wepkey 1:0xF4AE43E9BA description WIFI" > defaultrouter=3D"192.168.1.1" > apache22_enable=3D"YES" > hald_enable=3D"YES" > dbus_enable=3D"YES" > samba_enable=3D"YES" > nmbd_enable=3D"YES" > smbd_enable=3D"YES" > winbindd_enable=3D"YES" > hostname=3D"yeaguy.com" > ifconfig_em0=3D"inet 10.1.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 10.1.1.255 > description LAN" > inetd_enable=3D"YES" > linux_enable=3D"YES" > sshd_enable=3D"YES" > usbd_enable=3D"YES" > postfix_enable=3D"YES" > sendmail_enable=3D"NO" > sendmail_submit_enable=3D"NO" > sendmail_outbound_enable=3D"NO" > sendmail_msp_queue_enable=3D"NO" > firewall_enable=3D"YES" > firewall_script=3D"/etc/fire" > ipnat_enable=3D"YES" > ipnat_program=3D"/sbin/ipnat" > ipnat_rules=3D"/etc/ipnat.rules" > ipnat_flags=3D"" > #ipmon_enable=3D"YES" > #ipmon_program=3D"/sbin/ipmon" > #ipmon_flags=3D"-Ds" > named_enable=3D"YES" > ntpdate_enable=3D"YES" > ntpdate_program=3D"ntpdate" > ntpdate_flags=3D"-b 0.north-america.pool.ntp.org" > mysql_enable=3D"YES" > clamav_clamd_enable=3D"YES" > clamav_freshclam_enable=3D"YES" > amavisd_enable=3D"YES" > #amavisd_ram=3D"512m" > pf_enable=3D"YES" > pf_rules=3D"/etc/pf.conf" > pflog_enable=3D"YES" > saver=3D"daemon" > > > > [vic@yeaguy ~]$ ifconfig > em0: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu 15= 00 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0description: LAN > options=3D219b > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0ether 00:16:76:bf:17:29 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0inet 10.1.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.1.1.255 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0status: active > ipfw0: flags=3D8801 metric 0 mtu 65536 > pflog0: flags=3D141 metric 0 mtu 33200 > lo0: flags=3D8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0options=3D3 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0nd6 options=3D3 > pfsync0: flags=3D0<> metric 0 mtu 1460 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0syncpeer: 224.0.0.240 maxupd: 128 > rum0: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu 2= 290 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0ether 00:1e:e5:a8:bd:5a > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect mode 11g > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0status: associated > wlan0: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu = 1500 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0description: WIFI > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0ether 00:1e:e5:a8:bd:5a > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0inet 192.168.1.169 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.= 255 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet OFDM/18Mbps mode 11g > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0status: associated > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0ssid vicnet channel 11 (2462 MHz 11g) bssid 00:22:6b:66:bf= :74 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0country US authmode OPEN privacy ON deftxkey 1 wepkey 1:40= -bit > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0txpower 0 bmiss 7 scanvalid 60 bgscan bgscanintvl 300 bgsc= anidle 250 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0roam:rssi 7 roam:rate 5 protmode CTS > [vic@yeaguy ~]$ > > > [vic@yeaguy ~]$ netstat -rn > Routing tables > > Internet: > Destination =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Gateway =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0Flags =A0 =A0Re= fs =A0 =A0 =A0Use =A0Netif Expire > default =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0192.168.1.1 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0UGS =A0 =A0 =A0= =A0 1 =A0 =A0 2208 =A0wlan0 > 10.1.1.0/24 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0link#1 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 U =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0 4 =A0 =A016001 =A0 =A0em0 > 10.1.1.1 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 link#1 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 UHS =A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0 0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A00 =A0 =A0lo0 > 127.0.0.1 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0link#4 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 UH =A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0 =A00 =A0 =A0 =A0 36 =A0 =A0lo0 > 192.168.1.0/24 =A0 =A0 link#7 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 U =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0 6 =A0 =A0 7123 =A0wlan0 > 192.168.1.169 =A0 =A0 =A0link#7 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 UHS =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0 0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A00 =A0 =A0lo0 > > Internet6: > Destination =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Gateway =A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 Flags Netif > Expire > ::1 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 ::1 =A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 UH lo0 > fe80::%lo0/64 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 link#4 =A0 =A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0U lo0 > fe80::1%lo0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 link#4 =A0 =A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0UHS lo0 > ff01:4::/32 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 fe80::1%lo0 =A0 = =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 U lo0 > ff02::%lo0/32 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 fe80::1%lo0 =A0 =A0= =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0 U lo0 > [vic@yeaguy ~]$ > > > > yeaguy# ipnat -l > List of active MAP/Redirect filters: > map wlan0 10.1.1.0/24 -> 192.168.1.169/32 portmap tcp/udp 10000:60000 > map wlan0 10.1.1.0/24 -> 192.168.1.169/32 > > List of active sessions: > MAP 10.1.1.190 =A0 =A0 =A053867 <- -> 192.168.1.169 =A0 54939 [69.147.83.= 34 80] > MAP 10.1.1.190 =A0 =A0 =A053401 <- -> 192.168.1.169 =A0 45879 [72.14.204.= 147 80] > MAP 10.1.1.190 =A0 =A0 =A053398 <- -> 192.168.1.169 =A0 18541 [72.14.204.= 147 80] > MAP 10.1.1.190 =A0 =A0 =A053397 <- -> 192.168.1.169 =A0 27460 [72.14.204.= 147 80] > yeaguy# > > > > I am thinking of doing a fresh install to see if my issue clears.. =A0I a= m > beyond frustrated.. A WAN IP and router change and now I have some odd > tick/hangup on the system???!!! =A0that makes no sense.. if i put the old > router in place it works fine.. I really dont want to use the old router > either,, it requires a reboot daily.. it flakey... > > I checked the router for ACLs and anything that might cause conflict but = I > am not seeing anything.. =A0I really cant see how its the new router.. my= WIN > LAPTOP when connecting to the router works flawlessly... =A0The only odd = thing > I do see in regards to the router and FreeBSD box is the WEP attributes: > > ifconfig shows: > > wepkey 1:40-bit // Router shows: WEP Encryption: "64 bits 10 hex digits".= . > is that an issue?? > > Router is a Linksys WRT54G2... =A0 My router logs show in and out traffic= from > the FreeBSD box.. so this is why Im thinking its the FreeBSD box... > > Can i do a system wide grep on all files to see if i find the OLD WAN IP > hardcoded somewhere??? > > I have completely disable ipfw as well: > > yeaguy# ipfw -q flush > yeaguy# ipfw show > 65535 4145 3401628 allow ip from any to any > > If anyone can assist Id be very greatful.. > > Thanks > > Justin V. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 12:46:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 306E5106566B for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:46:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 768418FC08 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:46:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.193]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D1C85C21 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:50:52 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4D076635.1070608@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:42:29 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101119 Thunderbird/3.0.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: pls help.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:46:04 -0000 On 12/14/10 19:54, Justin V. wrote: > Hi, > > I am having a very difficult time understanding what is going on with > this FreeBSD machine.. > > I was having inet trouble so i put in a new router on my network (home > network).. > > I have a FreeBSD machine on my network: > > FreeBSD yeaguy.com 8.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE #3: Thu Nov 4 > 20:43:41 PDT 2010 vic@yeaguy.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HBCA i386 > > > I have windows machines on my network.. > > > One of my windows machines is my laptop and I connect directly to the > router via WIFI without any trouble at all... I can browse any > website without complaint. > > My FreeBSD system connects to my WIFI router just fine as well.. I am > seeing troubles browsing the inet with my FreeBSD machine (Xorg and > opera) Pulling up Google.com can take up to 30s.. > > My Other windows machine is using the FreeBSD as its gateway, I am > running ipnat. This pc suffers from the same issues as the FreeBSD box.. > > I configured the new router with the same ssid and wepkey.. so minimal > adjustments would have to be made for other WIFI users in the house.. > Everyone is fine except me... > > My server is fine as far as my Website is concerned.. I changed my DNS > with my host to point to my new WAN IP.. I can pull my page fine.. I > can ssh to my server fine from my phone, phones ip is from my Phones > netowrk.. this is not being done via WIFI on my phone.. > > So my Nat'd WIN PC and my FreeBSD Xorg cannot browse the internet like > it used to.. 30s to 40s to pull up google is just unacceptable, when I > have my laptop sitting here using the same WIFI router pulling it up > in about 3ms... > > Another odd symptom I am seeing is that when i issue the command > 'alpine' to check my email, it hangs for a good 30s.... So in my > mind, Im thinking, what changed?? My router and my Public IP.. thats > it.. its almost like I have my OLD WAN ip hardcoded somewhere causing > a conflict.. I cannot find it hardcoded anywhere.. > > Heres an example of what im seeing: > > [vic@yeaguy ~]$ ping google.com > PING google.com (72.14.204.147): 56 data bytes > 64 bytes from 72.14.204.147: icmp_seq=0 ttl=52 time=85.460 ms > 64 bytes from 72.14.204.147: icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=85.152 ms > 64 bytes from 72.14.204.147: icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=84.048 ms > 64 bytes from 72.14.204.147: icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=82.442 ms > ^C > --- google.com ping statistics --- > 4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss > round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 82.442/84.275/85.460/1.182 ms > > > [vic@yeaguy ~]$ telnet google.com 80 > Trying 72.14.204.147... > Connected to google.com. > Escape character is '^]'. > ^] > telnet> q > Connection closed. > [vic@yeaguy ~]$ > > > I am unable to browse to nytimes.com via FreeBSD Opera browser or WIN > PC that is using the FreeBSD as the gateway, but I can telnet to it on > tcp port 80 just fine.. > > [vic@yeaguy ~]$ telnet nytimes.com 80 > Trying 199.239.136.200... > Connected to nytimes.com. > Escape character is '^]'. > get > Bad request >

Bad request

> Your browser sent a query this server could not understand. > Connection closed by foreign host. > [vic@yeaguy ~]$ > > > Heres some config files: > > > [vic@yeaguy ~]$ cat /etc/rc.conf > wlans_rum0="wlan0" > gateway_enable="YES" > ifconfig_wlan0="inet 192.168.1.169 netmask 255.255.255.0 ssid vicnet > wepmode on weptxkey 1 wepkey 1:0xF4AE43E9BA description WIFI" > defaultrouter="192.168.1.1" > apache22_enable="YES" > hald_enable="YES" > dbus_enable="YES" > samba_enable="YES" > nmbd_enable="YES" > smbd_enable="YES" > winbindd_enable="YES" > hostname="yeaguy.com" > ifconfig_em0="inet 10.1.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 10.1.1.255 > description LAN" > inetd_enable="YES" > linux_enable="YES" > sshd_enable="YES" > usbd_enable="YES" > postfix_enable="YES" > sendmail_enable="NO" > sendmail_submit_enable="NO" > sendmail_outbound_enable="NO" > sendmail_msp_queue_enable="NO" > firewall_enable="YES" > firewall_script="/etc/fire" > ipnat_enable="YES" > ipnat_program="/sbin/ipnat" > ipnat_rules="/etc/ipnat.rules" > ipnat_flags="" > #ipmon_enable="YES" > #ipmon_program="/sbin/ipmon" > #ipmon_flags="-Ds" > named_enable="YES" > ntpdate_enable="YES" > ntpdate_program="ntpdate" > ntpdate_flags="-b 0.north-america.pool.ntp.org" > mysql_enable="YES" > clamav_clamd_enable="YES" > clamav_freshclam_enable="YES" > amavisd_enable="YES" > #amavisd_ram="512m" > pf_enable="YES" > pf_rules="/etc/pf.conf" > pflog_enable="YES" > saver="daemon" > > > > [vic@yeaguy ~]$ ifconfig > em0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 > description: LAN > options=219b > > ether 00:16:76:bf:17:29 > inet 10.1.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.1.1.255 > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) > status: active > ipfw0: flags=8801 metric 0 mtu 65536 > pflog0: flags=141 metric 0 mtu 33200 > lo0: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 > options=3 > inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4 > inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 > nd6 options=3 > pfsync0: flags=0<> metric 0 mtu 1460 > syncpeer: 224.0.0.240 maxupd: 128 > rum0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu > 2290 > ether 00:1e:e5:a8:bd:5a > media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect mode 11g > status: associated > wlan0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu > 1500 > description: WIFI > ether 00:1e:e5:a8:bd:5a > inet 192.168.1.169 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 > media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet OFDM/18Mbps mode 11g > status: associated > ssid vicnet channel 11 (2462 MHz 11g) bssid 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 > country US authmode OPEN privacy ON deftxkey 1 wepkey 1:40-bit > txpower 0 bmiss 7 scanvalid 60 bgscan bgscanintvl 300 > bgscanidle 250 > roam:rssi 7 roam:rate 5 protmode CTS > [vic@yeaguy ~]$ > > > [vic@yeaguy ~]$ netstat -rn > Routing tables > > Internet: > Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif > Expire > default 192.168.1.1 UGS 1 2208 wlan0 > 10.1.1.0/24 link#1 U 4 16001 em0 > 10.1.1.1 link#1 UHS 0 0 lo0 > 127.0.0.1 link#4 UH 0 36 lo0 > 192.168.1.0/24 link#7 U 6 7123 wlan0 > 192.168.1.169 link#7 UHS 0 0 lo0 > > Internet6: > Destination Gateway Flags > Netif Expire > ::1 ::1 UH lo0 > fe80::%lo0/64 link#4 U lo0 > fe80::1%lo0 link#4 UHS lo0 > ff01:4::/32 fe80::1%lo0 U lo0 > ff02::%lo0/32 fe80::1%lo0 U lo0 > [vic@yeaguy ~]$ > > > > yeaguy# ipnat -l > List of active MAP/Redirect filters: > map wlan0 10.1.1.0/24 -> 192.168.1.169/32 portmap tcp/udp 10000:60000 > map wlan0 10.1.1.0/24 -> 192.168.1.169/32 > > List of active sessions: > MAP 10.1.1.190 53867 <- -> 192.168.1.169 54939 [69.147.83.34 80] > MAP 10.1.1.190 53401 <- -> 192.168.1.169 45879 [72.14.204.147 80] > MAP 10.1.1.190 53398 <- -> 192.168.1.169 18541 [72.14.204.147 80] > MAP 10.1.1.190 53397 <- -> 192.168.1.169 27460 [72.14.204.147 80] > yeaguy# > > > > I am thinking of doing a fresh install to see if my issue clears.. I > am beyond frustrated.. A WAN IP and router change and now I have some > odd tick/hangup on the system???!!! that makes no sense.. if i put > the old router in place it works fine.. I really dont want to use the > old router either,, it requires a reboot daily.. it flakey... > > I checked the router for ACLs and anything that might cause conflict > but I am not seeing anything.. I really cant see how its the new > router.. my WIN LAPTOP when connecting to the router works > flawlessly... The only odd thing I do see in regards to the router > and FreeBSD box is the WEP attributes: > > ifconfig shows: > > wepkey 1:40-bit // Router shows: WEP Encryption: "64 bits 10 hex > digits".. is that an issue?? > > Router is a Linksys WRT54G2... My router logs show in and out > traffic from the FreeBSD box.. so this is why Im thinking its the > FreeBSD box... > > Can i do a system wide grep on all files to see if i find the OLD WAN > IP hardcoded somewhere??? > > I have completely disable ipfw as well: > > yeaguy# ipfw -q flush > yeaguy# ipfw show > 65535 4145 3401628 allow ip from any to any > > If anyone can assist Id be very greatful.. > > Thanks > > Justin V. A reload would possibly solve it but I'd say its extreme. I'd be more likely to start again and reconfigure your net from scratch. Instead of adjusting values in rc.conf, wipe the wifi related stuff and start again. That said, can you enlighten why you don't use wpa? wep's been hacked for nearly a decade- wpa's now even up to wpa2... and last I checked ye ole Linksys WRT54G was capable even then of wpa2. IMO you'd be more secure and definitely easier and reliably setup doing the switch to wpa- no confusion in reinitialising old settings- in rc.conf: ifconfig_wlan0="{inet or dhcp} wpa" In /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf: network={ ssid="myssid" psk="secret" } And done. If it still doesn't work its somewhere to start from, but its basic enough to work straight off the bat. Once its working you can then complicate it as much as you like... :) That said 64 and 40 bit doesn't quite sound the same to me... HTH From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 12:58:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 384121065674 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:58:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 7h3.k3rn31@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFBDD8FC1A for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:58:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so440391wyf.13 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 04:58:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:user-agent; bh=F6Jlr8W4Ac7NkHMc14Ge2e4IkBWQ+AQP04Y55kURh9g=; b=YjELdiLfVyVXL2FsptjwI0XTpX6Bl7UdyCX8fiOFi849uPAOeG/2ZHYC5hVsCxlLFt oOV+1UrMWYUZqejM7bZ7ihQJQOItWdV3PRMfrVfTErDUFQLGM1JaZ3aB0Ie+vwhIHz6X QqkWIOiX5ey3Ex/cEZhfUo3/s3VuTl0pjyBdc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:user-agent; b=jxGnbzY3WoEe6bnDLQZhGhKmUAsUa6cDZRgdhYy1+jLklzkUBp9BoZXdZfVYz8xkBM inTnLLr8L622+hpMJe/3sWyTo2MI6yPH9AycMKhsbVaZ09rMDEp70HXUP7FuaNFDsffO RYyZ8r6wxkoTspLQSXTwfG59rhqdvvER1lNA4= Received: by 10.216.239.67 with SMTP id b45mr2572087wer.43.1292329601906; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 04:26:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from gmail.com (host148-155-dynamic.16-87-r.retail.telecomitalia.it [87.16.155.148]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id a2sm18232wer.17.2010.12.14.04.26.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 14 Dec 2010 04:26:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:26:35 +0100 From: Davide Petilli <7h3.k3rn31@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101214132631.GB1565@gmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: ACPI error message X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:58:06 -0000 During the boot I can see these error mesages related to acpi. I've built my kernel but the error messages come up on the default kernel too. Does anyone know what is it and how to solve this? I tried to figure it out by myself without succes. These are the relevant parts of my dmesg: ----------------------------------------- acpi0: on motherboard acpi0: [ITHREAD] acpi0: Power Button (fixed) unknown: I/O range not supported ACPI Error: No handler for Region [RAM_] (0xc2cff5c0) [EmbeddedControl] (20100331/evregion-487) ACPI Error: Region EmbeddedControl(0x3) has no handler (20100331/exfldio-383) ACPI Error (psparse-0633): Method parse/execution failed [\\_SB_.BAT0._STA] (Node 0xc2cdd5c0), AE_NOT_EXIST ACPI Error (uteval-0318): Method execution failed [\\_SB_.BAT0._STA] (Node 0xc2cdd5c0), AE_NOT_EXIST ACPI Error: No handler for Region [RAM_] (0xc2cff5c0) [EmbeddedControl] (20100331/evregion-487) ACPI Error: Region EmbeddedControl(0x3) has no handler (20100331/exfldio-383) ACPI Error (psparse-0633): Method parse/execution failed [\\_SB_.BAT0._STA] (Node 0xc2cdd5c0), AE_NOT_EXIST ACPI Error (uteval-0318): Method execution failed [\\_SB_.BAT0._STA] (Node 0xc2cdd5c0), AE_NOT_EXIST ----------------------------------------- My platform: FreeBSD Dragon 8.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE #3: Sun Dec 12 01:10:45 CET 2010 root@Dragon:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DRAGON i386 Regards. -- Davide Petili - "k3rn31" Potenza, Italy FreeBSD, Mac OSX, GNU/Debian, GNU/Hurd. Geek since birth. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 13:40:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C59F0106566B for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 13:40:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (ns2.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 986358FC08 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 13:40:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.3/rdb1) id oBEDeae1010475; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 07:40:36 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 07:40:36 -0600 (CST) From: Robert Bonomi Message-ID: <201012141340.oBEDeae1010475@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, vic@yeaguy.com Cc: Subject: Re: pls help.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 13:40:38 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Dec 14 05:45:55 2010 > Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 01:54:26 -0800 (PST) > From: "Justin V." > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: pls help.. > > Hi, > > I am having a very difficult time understanding what is going on with this > FreeBSD machine.. > > I was having inet trouble so i put in a new router on my network (home > network).. > > I have a FreeBSD machine on my network: > > FreeBSD yeaguy.com 8.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE #3: Thu Nov 4 20:43:41 > PDT 2010 vic@yeaguy.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HBCA i386 > > > I have windows machines on my network.. > > > One of my windows machines is my laptop and I connect directly to the > router via WIFI without any trouble at all... I can browse any website > without complaint. > > My FreeBSD system connects to my WIFI router just fine as well.. I am > seeing troubles browsing the inet with my FreeBSD machine (Xorg and > opera) Pulling up Google.com can take up to 30s.. Without reading any further, this simply =reeks= of being a DNS problem. (99.999998792+% of all "30+ seconds to something over the net" problems are timeout issue. :) I suspect: a) the new router is not using the same 'local network' adddress as the old one was, This is not a total show stopper, because everyting 'local' is using DHCP to get both the local machine address _and_ the router address. b) you have a DNS server address hard-coded in the /etc/resolv.conf file. (the old router and new router are providing DNS proxy services on *different* addresses, and wyat you have hard-coded is the -old- address) c) your FBSD machine is trying to query the hard-coded DNS server address _first_, and when it gets no response, it *eventually* (ie. after 30 seconds) tries the 'second' DNS server address it has, which is the one learned by DHCP -- that works, the name resolves, and the page loads. On a WORKING windows box click "Start->Run", and type 'ipconfig/all' in the box, to see what it is using for a DNS server. Check '/etc/resolv.conf' on your FreeBSD box, and see if it lists a *different* address on a 'namemserver' line. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 14:27:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06F7B106564A for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:27:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vic@yeaguy.com) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.125]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B42308FC16 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:27:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=NFUeGz0loTdi/T6hXKngYYtckjed7x3pKvNOqmBBK18= c=1 sm=0 a=uRK6ZUxDawFwC8+94ldQlg==:17 a=iOhrDboYAAAA:8 a=1XWaLZrsAAAA:8 a=ZJjxc0SMAAAA:8 a=85N1-lAfAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=ayC55rCoAAAA:8 a=ppa5IZbrAAAA:8 a=CjxXgO3LAAAA:8 a=rvDH6TWmdEBvevEjffUA:9 a=oLZHdtcpEwz3PzZ3_BIA:7 a=OQORj96uFrLSUxfBxu3rn-gCObYA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=pZnKPkZR_lIA:10 a=u6pmmePcEMEA:10 a=xuOyKSTLVHYA:10 a=W3IaIUEmhbwA:10 a=-_C46MR6lL4A:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=6khgNj21rzQjJTo8:21 a=NBnMPDfT7l4IHZdk:21 a=uRK6ZUxDawFwC8+94ldQlg==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 66.27.133.231 Received: from [66.27.133.231] ([66.27.133.231:61483] helo=[192.168.1.169]) by hrndva-oedge04.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id F8/9B-12606-2CE770D4; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:27:14 +0000 Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 06:26:57 -0800 (PST) From: "Justin V." To: Mubeesh ali In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="623271173-342288475-1292336834=:2430" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pls help.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:27:16 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --623271173-342288475-1292336834=:2430 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Tue, 14 Dec 2010, Mubeesh ali wrote: > try traceroute to check how packets are going out. do u have any > proxy hardcoded in browser in bsd ? > > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Justin V. wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am having a very difficult time understanding what is going on with this >> FreeBSD machine.. >> >> I was having inet trouble so i put in a new router on my network (home >> network).. >> >> I have a FreeBSD machine on my network: >> >> FreeBSD yeaguy.com 8.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE #3: Thu Nov  4 20:43:41 >> PDT 2010     vic@yeaguy.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HBCA  i386 >> >> >> I have windows machines on my network.. >> >> >> One of my windows machines is my laptop and I connect directly to the router >> via WIFI without any trouble at all...  I can browse any website without >> complaint. >> >> My FreeBSD system connects to my WIFI router just fine as well..  I am >> seeing troubles browsing the inet with my FreeBSD machine (Xorg and opera) >> Pulling up Google.com can take up to 30s.. >> >> My Other windows machine is using the FreeBSD as its gateway, I am running >> ipnat. This pc suffers from the same issues as the FreeBSD box.. >> >> I configured the new router with the same ssid and wepkey.. so minimal >> adjustments would have to be made for other WIFI users in the house.. >> Everyone is fine except me... >> >> My server is fine as far as my Website is concerned.. I changed my DNS with >> my host to point to my new WAN IP.. I can pull my page fine.. I can ssh to >> my server fine from my phone, phones ip is from my Phones netowrk.. this is >> not being done via WIFI on my phone.. >> >> So my Nat'd WIN PC and my FreeBSD Xorg cannot browse the internet like it >> used to.. 30s to 40s to pull up google is just unacceptable, when I have my >> laptop sitting here using the same WIFI router pulling it up in about 3ms... >> >> Another odd symptom I am seeing is that when i issue the command 'alpine' to >> check my email, it hangs for a good 30s....  So in my mind, Im thinking, >> what changed?? My router and my Public IP.. thats it.. its almost like I >> have my OLD WAN ip hardcoded somewhere causing a conflict.. I cannot find it >> hardcoded anywhere.. >> >> Heres an example of what im seeing: >> >> [vic@yeaguy ~]$ ping google.com >> PING google.com (72.14.204.147): 56 data bytes >> 64 bytes from 72.14.204.147: icmp_seq=0 ttl=52 time=85.460 ms >> 64 bytes from 72.14.204.147: icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=85.152 ms >> 64 bytes from 72.14.204.147: icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=84.048 ms >> 64 bytes from 72.14.204.147: icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=82.442 ms >> ^C >> --- google.com ping statistics --- >> 4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss >> round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 82.442/84.275/85.460/1.182 ms >> >> >> [vic@yeaguy ~]$ telnet google.com 80 >> Trying 72.14.204.147... >> Connected to google.com.   >> Escape character is '^]'. >> ^] >> telnet> q >> Connection closed. >> [vic@yeaguy ~]$ >> >> >> I am unable to browse to nytimes.com via FreeBSD Opera browser or WIN PC >> that is using the FreeBSD as the gateway, but I can telnet to it on tcp port >> 80 just fine.. >> >> [vic@yeaguy ~]$ telnet nytimes.com 80 >> Trying 199.239.136.200... >> Connected to nytimes.com. >> Escape character is '^]'. >> get >> Bad request >>

Bad request

>> Your browser sent a query this server could not understand. >> Connection closed by foreign host. >> [vic@yeaguy ~]$ >> >> >> Heres some config files: >> >> >> [vic@yeaguy ~]$ cat /etc/rc.conf >> wlans_rum0="wlan0" >> gateway_enable="YES" >> ifconfig_wlan0="inet 192.168.1.169 netmask 255.255.255.0 ssid vicnet wepmode >> on weptxkey 1 wepkey 1:0xF4AE43E9BA description WIFI" >> defaultrouter="192.168.1.1" >> apache22_enable="YES" >> hald_enable="YES" >> dbus_enable="YES" >> samba_enable="YES" >> nmbd_enable="YES" >> smbd_enable="YES" >> winbindd_enable="YES" >> hostname="yeaguy.com" >> ifconfig_em0="inet 10.1.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 10.1.1.255 >> description LAN" >> inetd_enable="YES" >> linux_enable="YES" >> sshd_enable="YES" >> usbd_enable="YES" >> postfix_enable="YES" >> sendmail_enable="NO" >> sendmail_submit_enable="NO" >> sendmail_outbound_enable="NO" >> sendmail_msp_queue_enable="NO" >> firewall_enable="YES" >> firewall_script="/etc/fire" >> ipnat_enable="YES" >> ipnat_program="/sbin/ipnat" >> ipnat_rules="/etc/ipnat.rules" >> ipnat_flags="" >> #ipmon_enable="YES" >> #ipmon_program="/sbin/ipmon" >> #ipmon_flags="-Ds" >> named_enable="YES" >> ntpdate_enable="YES" >> ntpdate_program="ntpdate" >> ntpdate_flags="-b 0.north-america.pool.ntp.org" >> mysql_enable="YES" >> clamav_clamd_enable="YES" >> clamav_freshclam_enable="YES" >> amavisd_enable="YES" >> #amavisd_ram="512m" >> pf_enable="YES" >> pf_rules="/etc/pf.conf" >> pflog_enable="YES" >> saver="daemon" >> >> >> >> [vic@yeaguy ~]$ ifconfig >> em0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 >>        description: LAN >> options=219b >>        ether 00:16:76:bf:17:29 >>        inet 10.1.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.1.1.255 >>        media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) >>        status: active >> ipfw0: flags=8801 metric 0 mtu 65536 >> pflog0: flags=141 metric 0 mtu 33200 >> lo0: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 >>        options=3 >>        inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4 >>        inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 >>        inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 >>        nd6 options=3 >> pfsync0: flags=0<> metric 0 mtu 1460 >>        syncpeer: 224.0.0.240 maxupd: 128 >> rum0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 2290 >>        ether 00:1e:e5:a8:bd:5a >>        media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect mode 11g >>        status: associated >> wlan0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 >>        description: WIFI >>        ether 00:1e:e5:a8:bd:5a >>        inet 192.168.1.169 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 >>        media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet OFDM/18Mbps mode 11g >>        status: associated >>        ssid vicnet channel 11 (2462 MHz 11g) bssid 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 >>        country US authmode OPEN privacy ON deftxkey 1 wepkey 1:40-bit >>        txpower 0 bmiss 7 scanvalid 60 bgscan bgscanintvl 300 bgscanidle 250 >>        roam:rssi 7 roam:rate 5 protmode CTS >> [vic@yeaguy ~]$ >> >> >> [vic@yeaguy ~]$ netstat -rn >> Routing tables >> >> Internet: >> Destination        Gateway            Flags    Refs      Use  Netif Expire >> default            192.168.1.1        UGS         1     2208  wlan0 >> 10.1.1.0/24        link#1             U           4    16001    em0 >> 10.1.1.1           link#1             UHS         0        0    lo0 >> 127.0.0.1          link#4             UH          0       36    lo0 >> 192.168.1.0/24     link#7             U           6     7123  wlan0 >> 192.168.1.169      link#7             UHS         0        0    lo0 >> >> Internet6: >> Destination                       Gateway                       Flags Netif >> Expire >> ::1                               ::1                           UH lo0 >> fe80::%lo0/64                     link#4                        U lo0 >> fe80::1%lo0                       link#4                        UHS lo0 >> ff01:4::/32                       fe80::1%lo0                   U lo0 >> ff02::%lo0/32                     fe80::1%lo0                   U lo0 >> [vic@yeaguy ~]$ >> >> >> >> yeaguy# ipnat -l >> List of active MAP/Redirect filters: >> map wlan0 10.1.1.0/24 -> 192.168.1.169/32 portmap tcp/udp 10000:60000 >> map wlan0 10.1.1.0/24 -> 192.168.1.169/32 >> >> List of active sessions: >> MAP 10.1.1.190      53867 <- -> 192.168.1.169   54939 [69.147.83.34 80] >> MAP 10.1.1.190      53401 <- -> 192.168.1.169   45879 [72.14.204.147 80] >> MAP 10.1.1.190      53398 <- -> 192.168.1.169   18541 [72.14.204.147 80] >> MAP 10.1.1.190      53397 <- -> 192.168.1.169   27460 [72.14.204.147 80] >> yeaguy# >> >> >> >> I am thinking of doing a fresh install to see if my issue clears..  I am >> beyond frustrated.. A WAN IP and router change and now I have some odd >> tick/hangup on the system???!!!  that makes no sense.. if i put the old >> router in place it works fine.. I really dont want to use the old router >> either,, it requires a reboot daily.. it flakey... >> >> I checked the router for ACLs and anything that might cause conflict but I >> am not seeing anything..  I really cant see how its the new router.. my WIN >> LAPTOP when connecting to the router works flawlessly...  The only odd thing >> I do see in regards to the router and FreeBSD box is the WEP attributes: >> >> ifconfig shows: >> >> wepkey 1:40-bit // Router shows: WEP Encryption: "64 bits 10 hex digits".. >> is that an issue?? >> >> Router is a Linksys WRT54G2...   My router logs show in and out traffic from >> the FreeBSD box.. so this is why Im thinking its the FreeBSD box... >> >> Can i do a system wide grep on all files to see if i find the OLD WAN IP >> hardcoded somewhere??? >> >> I have completely disable ipfw as well: >> >> yeaguy# ipfw -q flush >> yeaguy# ipfw show >> 65535 4145 3401628 allow ip from any to any >> >> If anyone can assist Id be very greatful.. >> >> Thanks >> >> Justin V. >> >> >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > Traceroute and tcptraceroute looks fine, i did not config my browswer for a proxy: [vic@yeaguy ~]$ traceroute google.com traceroute: Warning: google.com has multiple addresses; using 72.14.204.147 traceroute to google.com (72.14.204.147), 64 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 1.572 ms 1.547 ms 1.500 ms 2 cpe-66-27-128-1.socal.res.rr.com (66.27.128.1) 13.884 ms 11.137 ms 12.865 ms 3 cpe-24-30-163-69.socal.res.rr.com (24.30.163.69) 13.247 ms 12.160 ms 12.742 ms 4 tge4-0-2.lsanca4-rtr1.socal.rr.com (24.30.162.233) 12.850 ms 14.191 ms 12.845 ms 5 BE7-lsanca4-rt1.socal.rr.com (66.75.131.2) 18.004 ms 34.453 ms 18.978 ms 6 ae-5-0.cr0.lax00.tbone.rr.com (66.109.6.102) 18.959 ms 19.177 ms 19.108 ms 7 ae-0-0.pr0.lax10.tbone.rr.com (66.109.6.133) 19.595 ms 54.456 ms 19.602 ms 8 72.14.197.157 (72.14.197.157) 19.469 ms 19.574 ms 72.14.198.73 (72.14.198.73) 19.340 ms 9 216.239.46.38 (216.239.46.38) 20.064 ms 17.185 ms 19.086 ms 10 216.239.43.125 (216.239.43.125) 76.895 ms 72.210 ms 71.343 ms 11 66.249.95.148 (66.249.95.148) 81.988 ms 86.973 ms 84.226 ms 12 66.249.94.46 (66.249.94.46) 94.994 ms 66.249.94.54 (66.249.94.54) 97.709 ms 66.249.94.46 (66.249.94.46) 95.313 ms 13 iad04s01-in-f147.1e100.net (72.14.204.147) 85.947 ms 88.162 ms 83.600 ms [vic@yeaguy ~]$ tcptraceroute yahoo.com Selected device wlan0, address 192.168.1.169, port 35655 for outgoing packets Tracing the path to yahoo.com (67.195.160.76) on TCP port 80, 30 hops max 1 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 9.720 ms 10.300 ms 10.305 ms 2 cpe-66-27-128-1.socal.res.rr.com (66.27.128.1) 11.998 ms 10.546 ms 12.721 ms 3 cpe-24-30-163-69.socal.res.rr.com (24.30.163.69) 13.240 ms 12.422 ms 12.966 ms 4 tge4-0-2.lsanca4-rtr1.socal.rr.com (24.30.162.233) 12.598 ms 13.053 ms 12.848 ms 5 BE7-lsanca4-rt1.socal.rr.com (66.75.131.2) 17.990 ms 16.835 ms 19.184 ms 6 * * * 7 ae-0-0.cr0.lax30.tbone.rr.com (66.109.6.5) 16.411 ms 16.039 ms 37.742 ms 8 ae-5-0.cr0.dca20.tbone.rr.com (66.109.6.3) 81.617 ms 82.178 ms 83.101 ms 9 ae-0-0.pr0.dca20.tbone.rr.com (66.109.6.167) 82.978 ms 81.674 ms 83.244 ms 10 66.109.9.167 (66.109.9.167) 88.702 ms 93.044 ms 92.648 ms 11 xe-10-0-0.msr2.ac2.yahoo.com (216.115.108.153) 109.434 ms 117.432 ms 107.595 ms 12 xe-10-2-0.clr3.ac4.yahoo.com (72.30.96.11) 94.587 ms 94.670 ms 92.717 ms 13 te-8-1.bas-a1.ac4.yahoo.com (76.13.0.173) 99.869 ms 102.185 ms 99.228 ms 14 * * * 15 ir1.fp.vip.ac4.yahoo.com (67.195.160.76) [open] 89.309 ms 99.914 ms 91.714 ms [vic@yeaguy ~]$ --623271173-342288475-1292336834=:2430-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 14:39:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5729010656D4; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:39:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugene@imedia.ru) Received: from lynx.imedia.ru (lynx.imedia.ru [83.242.167.254]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B951C8FC18; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:39:56 +0000 (UTC) X-All-Recipients: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=imedia.ru; s=common; t=1292336866; bh=MqdJ+FtZyHxeV3IfULRh/o76tGaCRdcS/ACOm1dBFLs=; h=From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id; b=ZCrALQSgp5689yIkKe2Av1DRTDrbl4t900OnkSm+ERBjwiGyh7pyhpOvtLyRkVFEp jUIrGk+nnsy2E2bLcgHxRu9qcS8RStY7NJbMSAMkBDyWrbQK5KgGVB4FfVSFyq6eu5 7X4qnWkNucPVBxbbuKoflpXtIEXiOhmRLi1CJPbk= Received: from badger.imedia.ru (root@badger.imedia.ru [10.167.1.243]) by lynx.imedia.ru (8.14.3/8.14.3/TWINS7_LDAP) with ESMTP id oBEERkOB044879; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:27:46 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from eugene@imedia.ru) Received: from badger.imedia.ru (eugene@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by badger.imedia.ru (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id oBEERkKf047875; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:27:46 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from eugene@imedia.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by badger.imedia.ru (8.14.4/8.13.8/Submit) id oBEERfBS047874; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:27:41 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from eugene@imedia.ru) From: Eugene Mitrofanov Organization: Independent Media Sanoma Magazines To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:27:41 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 X-Origin: badger.imedia.ru MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="koi8-r" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201012141727.41909.eugene@imedia.ru> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (lynx.imedia.ru [10.167.0.252]); Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:27:46 +0300 (MSK) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.4-exp at lynx.imedia.ru X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Subject: 8.1-STABLE Unexpected XML: what does it mean? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eugene Mitrofanov List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:39:57 -0000 Hi I observe the very strange message while run a lot of commands: root@beaver:eugene# glabel status Unexpected XML: name=stripesize data="18432" Unexpected XML: name=stripeoffset data="0" Unexpected XML: name=stripesize data="18432" Unexpected XML: name=stripeoffset data="0" Name Status Components iso9660/CDROM N/A acd0 root@beaver:eugene# mdconfig -l Unexpected XML: name=stripesize data="18432" Unexpected XML: name=stripeoffset data="0" root@beaver:eugene# gmirror status Unexpected XML: name=stripesize data="18432" Unexpected XML: name=stripeoffset data="0" gmirror: Command 'status' not available. What subsystem prints them? How can I fix it? Good luck -- EMIT-RIPN, EVM7-RIPE From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 14:42:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27877106566B for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:42:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vic@yeaguy.com) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.125]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D98BA8FC17 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:42:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=kXGwZUU/u1JTMRv8Axk4W0omja+vfTT+sGlOkodD8F8= c=1 sm=0 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=uRK6ZUxDawFwC8+94ldQlg==:17 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=iOhrDboYAAAA:8 a=1XWaLZrsAAAA:8 a=ZJjxc0SMAAAA:8 a=m7V7JrEGlZc75Z6TexgA:9 a=w7wwRkl-1yz2hxtAVlMA:7 a=v-nCVLmKmN1ciMsTcaNwhqmVQcsA:4 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=pZnKPkZR_lIA:10 a=u6pmmePcEMEA:10 a=xuOyKSTLVHYA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=-_C46MR6lL4A:10 a=DTkQkNNv4o3NfsqB:21 a=QFQORXWnOveHUTm4:21 a=uRK6ZUxDawFwC8+94ldQlg==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 66.27.133.231 Received: from [66.27.133.231] ([66.27.133.231:17210] helo=[192.168.1.169]) by hrndva-oedge02.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id FA/34-14897-452870D4; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:42:29 +0000 Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 06:42:11 -0800 (PST) From: "Justin V." To: Robert Bonomi In-Reply-To: <201012141340.oBEDeae1010475@mail.r-bonomi.com> Message-ID: References: <201012141340.oBEDeae1010475@mail.r-bonomi.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pls help.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:42:30 -0000 On Tue, 14 Dec 2010, Robert Bonomi wrote: >> From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Dec 14 05:45:55 2010 >> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 01:54:26 -0800 (PST) >> From: "Justin V." >> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> Subject: pls help.. >> >> Hi, >> >> I am having a very difficult time understanding what is going on with this >> FreeBSD machine.. >> >> I was having inet trouble so i put in a new router on my network (home >> network).. >> >> I have a FreeBSD machine on my network: >> >> FreeBSD yeaguy.com 8.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE #3: Thu Nov 4 20:43:41 >> PDT 2010 vic@yeaguy.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HBCA i386 >> >> >> I have windows machines on my network.. >> >> >> One of my windows machines is my laptop and I connect directly to the >> router via WIFI without any trouble at all... I can browse any website >> without complaint. >> >> My FreeBSD system connects to my WIFI router just fine as well.. I am >> seeing troubles browsing the inet with my FreeBSD machine (Xorg and >> opera) Pulling up Google.com can take up to 30s.. > > Without reading any further, this simply =reeks= of being a DNS problem. > (99.999998792+% of all "30+ seconds to something over the net" problems > are timeout issue. :) > > I suspect: > a) the new router is not using the same 'local network' adddress as the > old one was, This is not a total show stopper, because everyting > 'local' is using DHCP to get both the local machine address _and_ > the router address. > b) you have a DNS server address hard-coded in the /etc/resolv.conf file. > (the old router and new router are providing DNS proxy services on > *different* addresses, and wyat you have hard-coded is the -old- > address) > c) your FBSD machine is trying to query the hard-coded DNS server > address _first_, and when it gets no response, it *eventually* > (ie. after 30 seconds) tries the 'second' DNS server address it has, > which is the one learned by DHCP -- that works, the name resolves, > and the page loads. > > On a WORKING windows box click "Start->Run", and type 'ipconfig/all' in the > box, to see what it is using for a DNS server. > > Check '/etc/resolv.conf' on your FreeBSD box, and see if it lists a > *different* address on a 'namemserver' line. > > > Heres what my resolv.conf is, ive changed it to use the router and itself, no change in status: [vic@yeaguy ~]$ cat /etc/resolv.conf #domain yeaguy.com #nameserver 10.1.1.1 nameserver 192.168.1.1 [vic@yeaguy ~]$ Im currently set to use the router.. The WIN pc is using: 209.18.47.61 and 209.18.47.62.. hmm.. i will try those.. Still hangs and times out.. but able to resolve and ping google.com just fine.... grrrr... yeaguy# nslookup nytimes.com Server: 209.18.47.61 Address: 209.18.47.61#53 Non-authoritative answer: Name: nytimes.com Address: 199.239.136.200 yeaguy# ipnat -l List of active MAP/Redirect filters: map wlan0 10.1.1.0/24 -> 192.168.1.169/32 portmap tcp/udp 10000:60000 map wlan0 10.1.1.0/24 -> 192.168.1.169/32 List of active sessions: MAP 10.1.1.190 53401 <- -> 192.168.1.169 45879 [72.14.204.147 80] MAP 10.1.1.190 53398 <- -> 192.168.1.169 18541 [72.14.204.147 80] MAP 10.1.1.190 53397 <- -> 192.168.1.169 27460 [72.14.204.147 80] yeaguy# cat /etc/resolv.conf #domain yeaguy.com #nameserver 10.1.1.1 #nameserver 192.168.1.1 nameserver 209.18.47.61 nameserver 209.18.47.62 yeaguy# yeaguy# telnet nytimes.com 80 Trying 199.239.136.200... Connected to nytimes.com. Escape character is '^]'. I got google to come up after refreshing the page, nytimes still does not come up no matter what, can telnet it just fine on port 80 tho... this doesnt make sense. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 15:00:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EF16106564A for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:00:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nagios@todoo.biz) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [87.98.206.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD7198FC1B for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:00:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 657ED78C33 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:42:43 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.6.4 (20090625) at rmm.fr Received: from newmail.rmm.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id gcnMEOdpbjZM for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:42:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [87.98.206.99]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hidden) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2CCC178C32 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:42:43 +0100 (CET) From: nagios Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:42:42 +0100 Message-Id: To: Liste FreeBSD Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Subject: Creating clone of a HDD including boot partition X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:00:44 -0000 Hello,=20 I have setup a tailored made configuration (1 UFS partition + 1 swap + = boot sectors) for some hardware that I am reselling and would like to = clone one existing HDD (tailor made) and be able to dump to another new = HDD. =20 System is running pfSense with FreeBSD 7.2 and soon 8.x=20 What would be your suggested method to achieve this goal.=20 Thx.=20 =96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96= =96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96 ---------> Gr=E9gory Bernard Director <--------- ---------------> www.osnet.eu <--------------- --> Your provider of OpenSource appliances <-- =96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96= =96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96 OSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetO From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 15:04:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 555AB1065670 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:04:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ivanfrosty@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com (mail-gx0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D44C8FC13 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:04:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk28 with SMTP id 28so613124gxk.17 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 07:04:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=SygdBvRAbfaCKNYyKtaUsMJ/TWcuB+89C3HZypGzFZ8=; b=oonK123XRMCSZ5gvXroA8H+HjJKLPBT3kBeNXz8hJjVLpc3S8sxTPa57JmztMRML/Y 4bbxMlrbI/3TZGYCYm+gxtbe4w2i42G0mM3VULqXhuP1jZAM64IC/3BVB20uHyjs/cI6 rvA3HlbfwvuiPgtAnOmTQXUhjn6W6GngCZhN0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=qQ4Ok9XsbNLWMnp3246Ag6YkT8cJ+W1jsu0xHT2kohItEphlDfyQFrRNeSjzt1r6xZ oznBDAM2CLfj14QVw2WRb6ERLPy3hO4viMOuJCtdTrGtJSdsJtEsDjqsQ+zzykfrQwCa LC1hftraV4+tWxr2yDhIqI38joQAoXdDAlQoA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.13.4 with SMTP id 4mr3650045anm.102.1292339083115; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 07:04:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.101.15.20 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 07:04:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:04:42 +0300 Message-ID: From: Ivan Frosty To: Chris Brennan Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: libphp5.so X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:04:44 -0000 freebsd 8.0 release php5-5.2.11 apache2.2.13 mysql-server5.0.86 mysql-client5.0.86 those are the packages i installed. On 12/9/10, Chris Brennan wrote: > On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 11:51 AM, Ivan Frosty wrote: > >> yeah well ports cant download. i dont have internet, usually i >> download packages from a cyber then just do pkg_add when i get home. >> so really make doesnt work for me. however i installed php5,mysql and >> apache from a cd. but making php work,requires libphp5.so which my >> system doesnt have i386 pII. >> thanks for your time. >> >> > libphp5.so is built w/ any standard install of php. Lets try this: > > What version of FreeBSD? > What version of PHP? > What version of Apache? > What version of MySQL? > Is this in a VM or not? > > P.S. off-life replies and an on-list followup. > -- Frosty-456 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 15:19:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27266106566B; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:19:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugene@imedia.ru) Received: from lynx.imedia.ru (lynx.imedia.ru [83.242.167.254]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 889C78FC0A; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:19:49 +0000 (UTC) X-All-Recipients: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=imedia.ru; s=common; t=1292339988; bh=lLGllliIAh3hbPIw7GeHNKIBwvI7dIPDmtmIo5SlLYo=; h=From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Date:Cc:References:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id; b=DdTdMf0TGTmy9TLWAEUY9TscyT9U/vpuiUIn27KXwuLPb4ZDW9hilKNR4ouMUcuPd lorO/B6F0ausavH91eGvOcsB/R9yPFj2cLqARgzgEf0ILNGl3UEPy38RY15YG6/lzC d4HphyC8gKOy6ejdZ0aflRvmz6io56HbNgd+dKZ0= Received: from badger.imedia.ru (root@badger.imedia.ru [10.167.1.243]) by lynx.imedia.ru (8.14.3/8.14.3/TWINS7_LDAP) with ESMTP id oBEFJmmB055320; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:19:48 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from eugene@imedia.ru) Received: from badger.imedia.ru (eugene@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by badger.imedia.ru (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id oBEFJlZb048904; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:19:47 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from eugene@imedia.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by badger.imedia.ru (8.14.4/8.13.8/Submit) id oBEFJl68048903; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:19:47 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from eugene@imedia.ru) From: Eugene Mitrofanov Organization: Independent Media Sanoma Magazines To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:19:47 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <201012141727.41909.eugene@imedia.ru> In-Reply-To: X-Origin: badger.imedia.ru MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201012141819.47712.eugene@imedia.ru> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (lynx.imedia.ru [10.167.0.252]); Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:19:48 +0300 (MSK) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.4-exp at lynx.imedia.ru X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Ivan Voras , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.1-STABLE Unexpected XML: what does it mean? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eugene Mitrofanov List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:19:50 -0000 How can I locate this device? Also I dont understand why mdconfig complains? On Tuesday 14 December 2010, Ivan Voras wrote: > On 14/12/2010 15:27, Eugene Mitrofanov wrote: > > Hi > > > > I observe the very strange message while run a lot of commands: > > > > root@beaver:eugene# glabel status > > Unexpected XML: name=stripesize data="18432" > > Unexpected XML: name=stripeoffset data="0" > > Maybe you have a label or some other "custom" device name with non-ascii > characters or with characters which break xml parsing? > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > -- EMIT-RIPN, EVM7-RIPE From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 15:20:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68F9510656C1 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:20:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vic@yeaguy.com) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 194378FC08 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:20:07 +0000 (UTC) X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=kXGwZUU/u1JTMRv8Axk4W0omja+vfTT+sGlOkodD8F8= c=1 sm=0 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=uRK6ZUxDawFwC8+94ldQlg==:17 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=iOhrDboYAAAA:8 a=1XWaLZrsAAAA:8 a=ZJjxc0SMAAAA:8 a=75m9tRZCqAgJlCxfi2sA:9 a=OyBOHzICsy8AMl1XzekA:7 a=7ZVSud1XBVA30nYmThOHYA8-eeUA:4 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=pZnKPkZR_lIA:10 a=u6pmmePcEMEA:10 a=xuOyKSTLVHYA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=-_C46MR6lL4A:10 a=7y0AGi6IxL4LWfEI:21 a=ln2zdVXoBYyxokSl:21 a=uRK6ZUxDawFwC8+94ldQlg==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 66.27.133.231 Received: from [66.27.133.231] ([66.27.133.231:61505] helo=[192.168.1.169]) by hrndva-oedge02.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 9C/05-14897-62B870D4; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:20:07 +0000 Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 07:20:05 -0800 (PST) From: "Justin V." To: Robert Bonomi In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <201012141340.oBEDeae1010475@mail.r-bonomi.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pls help.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:20:08 -0000 On Tue, 14 Dec 2010, Justin V. wrote: > > > On Tue, 14 Dec 2010, Robert Bonomi wrote: > >>> From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Dec 14 05:45:55 2010 >>> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 01:54:26 -0800 (PST) >>> From: "Justin V." >>> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >>> Subject: pls help.. >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am having a very difficult time understanding what is going on with this >>> FreeBSD machine.. >>> >>> I was having inet trouble so i put in a new router on my network (home >>> network).. >>> >>> I have a FreeBSD machine on my network: >>> >>> FreeBSD yeaguy.com 8.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE #3: Thu Nov 4 20:43:41 >>> PDT 2010 vic@yeaguy.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HBCA i386 >>> >>> >>> I have windows machines on my network.. >>> >>> >>> One of my windows machines is my laptop and I connect directly to the >>> router via WIFI without any trouble at all... I can browse any website >>> without complaint. >>> >>> My FreeBSD system connects to my WIFI router just fine as well.. I am >>> seeing troubles browsing the inet with my FreeBSD machine (Xorg and >>> opera) Pulling up Google.com can take up to 30s.. >> >> Without reading any further, this simply =reeks= of being a DNS problem. >> (99.999998792+% of all "30+ seconds to something over the net" problems >> are timeout issue. :) >> >> I suspect: >> a) the new router is not using the same 'local network' adddress as the >> old one was, This is not a total show stopper, because everyting >> 'local' is using DHCP to get both the local machine address _and_ >> the router address. >> b) you have a DNS server address hard-coded in the /etc/resolv.conf file. >> (the old router and new router are providing DNS proxy services on >> *different* addresses, and wyat you have hard-coded is the -old- >> address) >> c) your FBSD machine is trying to query the hard-coded DNS server >> address _first_, and when it gets no response, it *eventually* >> (ie. after 30 seconds) tries the 'second' DNS server address it has, >> which is the one learned by DHCP -- that works, the name resolves, >> and the page loads. >> >> On a WORKING windows box click "Start->Run", and type 'ipconfig/all' in the >> box, to see what it is using for a DNS server. >> >> Check '/etc/resolv.conf' on your FreeBSD box, and see if it lists a >> *different* address on a 'namemserver' line. >> >> >> > > > Heres what my resolv.conf is, ive changed it to use the router and itself, no > change in status: > > > [vic@yeaguy ~]$ cat /etc/resolv.conf > #domain yeaguy.com > #nameserver 10.1.1.1 > nameserver 192.168.1.1 > [vic@yeaguy ~]$ > > Im currently set to use the router.. > > The WIN pc is using: > > 209.18.47.61 and 209.18.47.62.. hmm.. i will try those.. > > Still hangs and times out.. but able to resolve and ping google.com just > fine.... grrrr... > > > > yeaguy# nslookup nytimes.com > Server: 209.18.47.61 > Address: 209.18.47.61#53 > > Non-authoritative answer: > Name: nytimes.com > Address: 199.239.136.200 > > yeaguy# ipnat -l > List of active MAP/Redirect filters: > map wlan0 10.1.1.0/24 -> 192.168.1.169/32 portmap tcp/udp 10000:60000 > map wlan0 10.1.1.0/24 -> 192.168.1.169/32 > > List of active sessions: > MAP 10.1.1.190 53401 <- -> 192.168.1.169 45879 [72.14.204.147 80] > MAP 10.1.1.190 53398 <- -> 192.168.1.169 18541 [72.14.204.147 80] > MAP 10.1.1.190 53397 <- -> 192.168.1.169 27460 [72.14.204.147 80] > > yeaguy# cat /etc/resolv.conf > #domain yeaguy.com > #nameserver 10.1.1.1 > #nameserver 192.168.1.1 > nameserver 209.18.47.61 > nameserver 209.18.47.62 > yeaguy# > > > yeaguy# telnet nytimes.com 80 > Trying 199.239.136.200... > Connected to nytimes.com. > Escape character is '^]'. > > > I got google to come up after refreshing the page, nytimes still does not > come up no matter what, can telnet it just fine on port 80 tho... > > this doesnt make sense. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I think we are resolved... I statically set my NAT'd WIN PC to what the Laptop was picking up and problem solved.. I edited named.conf and set my forwarders to what my laptop was picking up and problem solved.. my named.conf have the forwarder set to: 192.168.1.1, apparently the new router and an old dns server from my last job.. which normally worked fine.. i suspect that the old router was able to handle dns, while this one cannot... Thanks so much.. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 15:29:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 181EE1065670; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:29:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from eugene@imedia.ru) Received: from lynx.imedia.ru (lynx.imedia.ru [83.242.167.254]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8B428FC18; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:29:19 +0000 (UTC) X-All-Recipients: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=imedia.ru; s=common; t=1292340558; bh=3qRVS3+asLmS9H0L778czEYUTAkxmnjS9RebfUOo06M=; h=From:Reply-To:To:Subject:Date:Cc:References:In-Reply-To: MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id; b=OPh6NOg9e2LZIs3YKAp2FeO4TOAOAVYw7A39RIsKP33KDA36N0HFjcGMesLjkGmOW 25fmRMMZHrmuHOcNa4ohpuhjpfDN1zZ81fhQv3bZqXdZU7BnNarh16WlBXIBln071m ytSkY/7yxW0GHCRzLVBWtW1bq4cVV67SdVX3JYzI= Received: from badger.imedia.ru (root@badger.imedia.ru [10.167.1.243]) by lynx.imedia.ru (8.14.3/8.14.3/TWINS7_LDAP) with ESMTP id oBEFTHHk057067; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:29:17 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from eugene@imedia.ru) Received: from badger.imedia.ru (eugene@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by badger.imedia.ru (8.14.4/8.13.1) with ESMTP id oBEFTHtT049036; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:29:17 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from eugene@imedia.ru) Received: from localhost (localhost [[UNIX: localhost]]) by badger.imedia.ru (8.14.4/8.13.8/Submit) id oBEFTHvY049035; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:29:17 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from eugene@imedia.ru) From: Eugene Mitrofanov Organization: Independent Media Sanoma Magazines To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:29:17 +0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 References: <201012141727.41909.eugene@imedia.ru> <201012141819.47712.eugene@imedia.ru> In-Reply-To: X-Origin: badger.imedia.ru MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201012141829.17662.eugene@imedia.ru> X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0.1 (lynx.imedia.ru [10.167.0.252]); Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:29:18 +0300 (MSK) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.4-exp at lynx.imedia.ru X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: Ivan Voras , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 8.1-STABLE Unexpected XML: what does it mean? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Eugene Mitrofanov List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:29:21 -0000 On Tuesday 14 December 2010, Ivan Voras wrote: > On 14/12/2010 16:19, Eugene Mitrofanov wrote: > > > > How can I locate this device? Also I dont understand why mdconfig complains? > > Try examining the output of > > # sysctl -b kern.geom.confxml Here they are: FD fd0 1 r0w0e0 fd0 1474560 512 18432 0 ACD acd0 1 r0w0e0 acd0t01 550307840 2048 r0w0e0 acd0 550307840 2048 LABEL acd0 2 r0w0e0 r0w0e0 iso9660/CDROM 550307840 2048 0 550307840 1074820 0 0 VFS ffs.ipsd0s1g 4 r1w1e1 ffs.ipsd0s1f 4 r1w1e1 ffs.da0s1d 4 r1w1e1 ffs.da1s1d 4 r1w1e1 ffs.da1s1e 4 r1w1e1 ffs.ipsd0s1e 4 r1w1e1 ffs.ipsd0s1d 4 r1w1e1 ffs.ipsd0s1a 4 r1w1e1 PART da1s1 3 BSD 8 0 1560072086 63 255 OK r2w2e4 r1w1e1 da1s1e 584008535552 512 419430416 1560072086 5 freebsd-ufs 214748372992 584008535552 7 r1w1e1 da1s1d 214748364800 512 16 419430415 4 freebsd-ufs 8192 214748364800 7 da0s1 3 BSD 8 0 4294945556 63 255 OK r1w1e2 r1w1e1 da0s1d 2199012125184 512 0 4294945556 4 freebsd-ufs 0 2199012125184 7 ipsd0s1 3 BSD 8 0 286744543 32 128 OK r6w6e11 r1w1e1 ipsd0s1g 56618885120 512 176160784 286744543 7 freebsd-ufs 90194321408 56618885120 7 r1w1e1 ipsd0s1f 17179869184 512 142606352 176160783 6 freebsd-ufs 73014452224 17179869184 7 r1w1e1 ipsd0s1e 51539607552 512 41943056 142606351 5 freebsd-ufs 21474844672 51539607552 7 r1w1e1 ipsd0s1d 8589934592 512 25165840 41943055 4 freebsd-ufs 12884910080 8589934592 7 r1w1e0 ipsd0s1b 8589934592 512 8388624 25165839 2 !0 4294975488 8589934592 0 r1w1e1 ipsd0s1a 4294967296 512 16 8388623 1 freebsd-ufs 8192 4294967296 7 da1 2 MBR 4 63 1560084434 63 255 OK r2w2e6 r2w2e4 da1s1 798756908544 512 63 1560072149 1 freebsd 32256 798756908544 165 active da0 2 MBR 4 63 4294950911 63 255 OK r1w1e3 r1w1e2 da0s1 2199012125184 512 63 4294945619 1 freebsd 32256 2199012125184 165 active ipsd0 2 MBR 4 32 286744575 32 128 OK r6w6e17 r6w6e11 ipsd0s1 146813206528 512 32 286744575 1 freebsd 16384 146813206528 165 active MD SWAP swap 4 r1w1e0 DISK da1 1 r2w2e6 da1 798763253760 512 255 63 da0 1 r1w1e3 da0 2199014866944 512 255 63 ipsd0 1 r6w6e17 ipsd0 146813222912 512 128 32 DEV da1s1e 4 r0w0e0 da1s1d 4 r0w0e0 da0s1d 4 r0w0e0 ipsd0s1g 4 r0w0e0 ipsd0s1f 4 r0w0e0 ipsd0s1e 4 r0w0e0 ipsd0s1d 4 r0w0e0 ipsd0s1b 4 r0w0e0 ipsd0s1a 4 r0w0e0 da1s1 3 r0w0e0 da0s1 3 r0w0e0 ipsd0s1 3 r0w0e0 iso9660/CDROM 3 r0w0e0 acd0t01 2 r0w0e0 da1 2 r0w0e0 da0 2 r0w0e0 ipsd0 2 r0w0e0 acd0 2 r0w0e0 fd0 2 r0w0e0 -- EMIT-RIPN, EVM7-RIPE From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 16:17:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1132F1065674 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 16:17:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vic@yeaguy.com) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF04D8FC14 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 16:17:31 +0000 (UTC) X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=kXGwZUU/u1JTMRv8Axk4W0omja+vfTT+sGlOkodD8F8= c=1 sm=0 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=uRK6ZUxDawFwC8+94ldQlg==:17 a=iOhrDboYAAAA:8 a=1XWaLZrsAAAA:8 a=ZJjxc0SMAAAA:8 a=85N1-lAfAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=g0I0BjmuTg7zOpTJzS8A:9 a=b7HefNfA_SyNTYjeZdkA:7 a=VsHBQEbh2nFRLM0L3MNaXzet-uUA:4 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=pZnKPkZR_lIA:10 a=u6pmmePcEMEA:10 a=xuOyKSTLVHYA:10 a=-_C46MR6lL4A:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=4b_IfI97YRMTVf2m:21 a=vqnGjnNAZuZGcf6l:21 a=uRK6ZUxDawFwC8+94ldQlg==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 66.27.133.231 Received: from [66.27.133.231] ([66.27.133.231:43569] helo=[192.168.1.169]) by hrndva-oedge02.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id FB/BD-14897-998970D4; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 16:17:30 +0000 Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 08:17:29 -0800 (PST) From: "Justin V." To: Da Rock In-Reply-To: <4D076635.1070608@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Message-ID: References: <4D076635.1070608@herveybayaustralia.com.au> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pls help.. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 16:17:32 -0000 On Tue, 14 Dec 2010, Da Rock wrote: > On 12/14/10 19:54, Justin V. wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am having a very difficult time understanding what is going on with this >> FreeBSD machine.. >> >> I was having inet trouble so i put in a new router on my network (home >> network).. >> >> I have a FreeBSD machine on my network: >> >> FreeBSD yeaguy.com 8.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE #3: Thu Nov 4 20:43:41 >> PDT 2010 vic@yeaguy.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HBCA i386 >> >> >> I have windows machines on my network.. >> >> >> One of my windows machines is my laptop and I connect directly to the >> router via WIFI without any trouble at all... I can browse any website >> without complaint. >> >> My FreeBSD system connects to my WIFI router just fine as well.. I am >> seeing troubles browsing the inet with my FreeBSD machine (Xorg and opera) >> Pulling up Google.com can take up to 30s.. >> >> My Other windows machine is using the FreeBSD as its gateway, I am running >> ipnat. This pc suffers from the same issues as the FreeBSD box.. >> >> I configured the new router with the same ssid and wepkey.. so minimal >> adjustments would have to be made for other WIFI users in the house.. >> Everyone is fine except me... >> >> My server is fine as far as my Website is concerned.. I changed my DNS with >> my host to point to my new WAN IP.. I can pull my page fine.. I can ssh to >> my server fine from my phone, phones ip is from my Phones netowrk.. this is >> not being done via WIFI on my phone.. >> >> So my Nat'd WIN PC and my FreeBSD Xorg cannot browse the internet like it >> used to.. 30s to 40s to pull up google is just unacceptable, when I have my >> laptop sitting here using the same WIFI router pulling it up in about >> 3ms... >> >> Another odd symptom I am seeing is that when i issue the command 'alpine' >> to check my email, it hangs for a good 30s.... So in my mind, Im thinking, >> what changed?? My router and my Public IP.. thats it.. its almost like I >> have my OLD WAN ip hardcoded somewhere causing a conflict.. I cannot find >> it hardcoded anywhere.. >> >> Heres an example of what im seeing: >> >> [vic@yeaguy ~]$ ping google.com >> PING google.com (72.14.204.147): 56 data bytes >> 64 bytes from 72.14.204.147: icmp_seq=0 ttl=52 time=85.460 ms >> 64 bytes from 72.14.204.147: icmp_seq=1 ttl=52 time=85.152 ms >> 64 bytes from 72.14.204.147: icmp_seq=2 ttl=52 time=84.048 ms >> 64 bytes from 72.14.204.147: icmp_seq=3 ttl=52 time=82.442 ms >> ^C >> --- google.com ping statistics --- >> 4 packets transmitted, 4 packets received, 0.0% packet loss >> round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 82.442/84.275/85.460/1.182 ms >> >> >> [vic@yeaguy ~]$ telnet google.com 80 >> Trying 72.14.204.147... >> Connected to google.com. >> Escape character is '^]'. >> ^] >> telnet> q >> Connection closed. >> [vic@yeaguy ~]$ >> >> >> I am unable to browse to nytimes.com via FreeBSD Opera browser or WIN PC >> that is using the FreeBSD as the gateway, but I can telnet to it on tcp >> port 80 just fine.. >> >> [vic@yeaguy ~]$ telnet nytimes.com 80 >> Trying 199.239.136.200... >> Connected to nytimes.com. >> Escape character is '^]'. >> get >> Bad request >>

Bad request

>> Your browser sent a query this server could not understand. >> Connection closed by foreign host. >> [vic@yeaguy ~]$ >> >> >> Heres some config files: >> >> >> [vic@yeaguy ~]$ cat /etc/rc.conf >> wlans_rum0="wlan0" >> gateway_enable="YES" >> ifconfig_wlan0="inet 192.168.1.169 netmask 255.255.255.0 ssid vicnet >> wepmode on weptxkey 1 wepkey 1:0xF4AE43E9BA description WIFI" >> defaultrouter="192.168.1.1" >> apache22_enable="YES" >> hald_enable="YES" >> dbus_enable="YES" >> samba_enable="YES" >> nmbd_enable="YES" >> smbd_enable="YES" >> winbindd_enable="YES" >> hostname="yeaguy.com" >> ifconfig_em0="inet 10.1.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 10.1.1.255 >> description LAN" >> inetd_enable="YES" >> linux_enable="YES" >> sshd_enable="YES" >> usbd_enable="YES" >> postfix_enable="YES" >> sendmail_enable="NO" >> sendmail_submit_enable="NO" >> sendmail_outbound_enable="NO" >> sendmail_msp_queue_enable="NO" >> firewall_enable="YES" >> firewall_script="/etc/fire" >> ipnat_enable="YES" >> ipnat_program="/sbin/ipnat" >> ipnat_rules="/etc/ipnat.rules" >> ipnat_flags="" >> #ipmon_enable="YES" >> #ipmon_program="/sbin/ipmon" >> #ipmon_flags="-Ds" >> named_enable="YES" >> ntpdate_enable="YES" >> ntpdate_program="ntpdate" >> ntpdate_flags="-b 0.north-america.pool.ntp.org" >> mysql_enable="YES" >> clamav_clamd_enable="YES" >> clamav_freshclam_enable="YES" >> amavisd_enable="YES" >> #amavisd_ram="512m" >> pf_enable="YES" >> pf_rules="/etc/pf.conf" >> pflog_enable="YES" >> saver="daemon" >> >> >> >> [vic@yeaguy ~]$ ifconfig >> em0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 >> description: LAN >> options=219b >> ether 00:16:76:bf:17:29 >> inet 10.1.1.1 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.1.1.255 >> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX ) >> status: active >> ipfw0: flags=8801 metric 0 mtu 65536 >> pflog0: flags=141 metric 0 mtu 33200 >> lo0: flags=8049 metric 0 mtu 16384 >> options=3 >> inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4 >> inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 >> inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 >> nd6 options=3 >> pfsync0: flags=0<> metric 0 mtu 1460 >> syncpeer: 224.0.0.240 maxupd: 128 >> rum0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 2290 >> ether 00:1e:e5:a8:bd:5a >> media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect mode 11g >> status: associated >> wlan0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 >> description: WIFI >> ether 00:1e:e5:a8:bd:5a >> inet 192.168.1.169 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 >> media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet OFDM/18Mbps mode 11g >> status: associated >> ssid vicnet channel 11 (2462 MHz 11g) bssid 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 >> country US authmode OPEN privacy ON deftxkey 1 wepkey 1:40-bit >> txpower 0 bmiss 7 scanvalid 60 bgscan bgscanintvl 300 bgscanidle >> 250 >> roam:rssi 7 roam:rate 5 protmode CTS >> [vic@yeaguy ~]$ >> >> >> [vic@yeaguy ~]$ netstat -rn >> Routing tables >> >> Internet: >> Destination Gateway Flags Refs Use Netif Expire >> default 192.168.1.1 UGS 1 2208 wlan0 >> 10.1.1.0/24 link#1 U 4 16001 em0 >> 10.1.1.1 link#1 UHS 0 0 lo0 >> 127.0.0.1 link#4 UH 0 36 lo0 >> 192.168.1.0/24 link#7 U 6 7123 wlan0 >> 192.168.1.169 link#7 UHS 0 0 lo0 >> >> Internet6: >> Destination Gateway Flags Netif >> Expire >> ::1 ::1 UH lo0 >> fe80::%lo0/64 link#4 U lo0 >> fe80::1%lo0 link#4 UHS lo0 >> ff01:4::/32 fe80::1%lo0 U lo0 >> ff02::%lo0/32 fe80::1%lo0 U lo0 >> [vic@yeaguy ~]$ >> >> >> >> yeaguy# ipnat -l >> List of active MAP/Redirect filters: >> map wlan0 10.1.1.0/24 -> 192.168.1.169/32 portmap tcp/udp 10000:60000 >> map wlan0 10.1.1.0/24 -> 192.168.1.169/32 >> >> List of active sessions: >> MAP 10.1.1.190 53867 <- -> 192.168.1.169 54939 [69.147.83.34 80] >> MAP 10.1.1.190 53401 <- -> 192.168.1.169 45879 [72.14.204.147 80] >> MAP 10.1.1.190 53398 <- -> 192.168.1.169 18541 [72.14.204.147 80] >> MAP 10.1.1.190 53397 <- -> 192.168.1.169 27460 [72.14.204.147 80] >> yeaguy# >> >> >> >> I am thinking of doing a fresh install to see if my issue clears.. I am >> beyond frustrated.. A WAN IP and router change and now I have some odd >> tick/hangup on the system???!!! that makes no sense.. if i put the old >> router in place it works fine.. I really dont want to use the old router >> either,, it requires a reboot daily.. it flakey... >> >> I checked the router for ACLs and anything that might cause conflict but I >> am not seeing anything.. I really cant see how its the new router.. my WIN >> LAPTOP when connecting to the router works flawlessly... The only odd >> thing I do see in regards to the router and FreeBSD box is the WEP >> attributes: >> >> ifconfig shows: >> >> wepkey 1:40-bit // Router shows: WEP Encryption: "64 bits 10 hex digits".. >> is that an issue?? >> >> Router is a Linksys WRT54G2... My router logs show in and out traffic >> from the FreeBSD box.. so this is why Im thinking its the FreeBSD box... >> >> Can i do a system wide grep on all files to see if i find the OLD WAN IP >> hardcoded somewhere??? >> >> I have completely disable ipfw as well: >> >> yeaguy# ipfw -q flush >> yeaguy# ipfw show >> 65535 4145 3401628 allow ip from any to any >> >> If anyone can assist Id be very greatful.. >> >> Thanks >> >> Justin V. > A reload would possibly solve it but I'd say its extreme. > > I'd be more likely to start again and reconfigure your net from scratch. > Instead of adjusting values in rc.conf, wipe the wifi related stuff and start > again. > > That said, can you enlighten why you don't use wpa? wep's been hacked for > nearly a decade- wpa's now even up to wpa2... and last I checked ye ole > Linksys WRT54G was capable even then of wpa2. > > IMO you'd be more secure and definitely easier and reliably setup doing the > switch to wpa- no confusion in reinitialising old settings- in rc.conf: > > ifconfig_wlan0="{inet or dhcp} wpa" > > In /etc/wpa_supplicant.conf: > > network={ > ssid="myssid" > psk="secret" > } > > And done. If it still doesn't work its somewhere to start from, but its basic > enough to work straight off the bat. Once its working you can then complicate > it as much as you like... :) > > That said 64 and 40 bit doesn't quite sound the same to me... > > HTH > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > WPA2 implemented.. thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 17:03:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 594F81065670 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:03:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A06098FC17 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:03:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from odyssey.starpoint.kiev.ua (alpha-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.101]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id SAA18923; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:43:25 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <4D079EAC.8090700@freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:43:24 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101029 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Eugene Mitrofanov References: <201012141727.41909.eugene@imedia.ru> In-Reply-To: <201012141727.41909.eugene@imedia.ru> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=KOI8-R Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras Subject: Re: 8.1-STABLE Unexpected XML: what does it mean? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:03:11 -0000 on 14/12/2010 16:27 Eugene Mitrofanov said the following: > Hi > > I observe the very strange message while run a lot of commands: > > root@beaver:eugene# glabel status > Unexpected XML: name=stripesize data="18432" > Unexpected XML: name=stripeoffset data="0" > Unexpected XML: name=stripesize data="18432" > Unexpected XML: name=stripeoffset data="0" > Name Status Components > iso9660/CDROM N/A acd0 > > root@beaver:eugene# mdconfig -l > Unexpected XML: name=stripesize data="18432" > Unexpected XML: name=stripeoffset data="0" > > root@beaver:eugene# gmirror status > Unexpected XML: name=stripesize data="18432" > Unexpected XML: name=stripeoffset data="0" > gmirror: Command 'status' not available. > > What subsystem prints them? How can I fix it? I'd hazard a guess that either your userland and kernel are out of sync or something like that is taking place. The messages come from libgeom and they mean it doesn't understand those "stripe*" properties. P.S. geom@ is often the best mailing list for geom issues. -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 17:37:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 141C3106566C for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:37:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike.jeays@rogers.com) Received: from smtp106.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com (smtp106.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com [68.142.225.204]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B78318FC13 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:37:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 6257 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2010 17:10:22 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=rogers.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=igzGnbmMMW2nQC+gkxcYe7aK1I54yRMMNg8b5Ol25YGJlbPhNqHgSWdZO/zd0TG7knyzs6xx0XRFFzkdQPUiq1gl4c5eVyH40ONfkQ8hOqcVlyFSPRTU+/hwfCQP+r3WDcr/ZgUw8wt3aMTxLCBQnjkMa5nJKKKv5IRSYvxCt1o= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rogers.com; s=s1024; t=1292346622; bh=7UPseJZ7uQmEvSkhd72OLyKervmwYmNuQYnAGC0uuwc=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=1IHIUW6XCL6cVIfzbCz709Qf+SfPN57HQjqv60IqEow2deS+to5UQF2fNQZPmQe1NG3ryQGpFkIfaUhtii4rwH6itlyHSK+CEL+Hg1oIBjABaUJrH6x80lb/UL4X9HxahjqKiYwHD9B6uyKqBVKKeAo4v/4ZeN7VqXJolb2YnDA= Received: from napoleon (mike.jeays@99.224.61.141 with login) by smtp106.rog.mail.re2.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Dec 2010 09:10:19 -0800 PST X-Yahoo-SMTP: N82WFx6swBBjwcHWPFR2CGt6udzA8RPrA.xm0enFFXaK2g-- X-YMail-OSG: QtID0MIVM1llFsZeePVAKBcdThwikNlD1.I2wTAuvtChCXk TtIB47x3SrDgqbolbg8FECQY.6ctEpXueZ_OXBoLR3c1KA0DxKNcUKJi.h8a .JnpmoxMKLn3JAbkwFuw_VhjH09q2xeL__YIS4oyAsWNRszVOBt3IdfsS0AP dW9qSmXtw.yVYpik2.5odZCxBNd2xTRleAM8ZCV7J9ZfAW6MeSHPfaYddiPe 0fstGBYe0tjmy403Fm3M1TsXN4wOLCWQAOwypZ1Gis.jodJzmZ1JFWv_D.e2 XPplW6iQV7IEhu3FgWnY- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:10:18 -0500 From: Mike Jeays To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101214121018.6fc2b4c1@napoleon> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.4 (GTK+ 2.20.1; i486-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:44:40 +0000 Subject: Re: Creating clone of a HDD including boot partition X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:37:03 -0000 Put it in a USB enclosure, and run dd in=3D/dev/sourcedisk out=3D/dev/targetdisk bs=3D1M Drink coffee until done. On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:42:42 +0100 nagios wrote: > Hello,=20 >=20 > I have setup a tailored made configuration (1 UFS partition + 1 swap + bo= ot sectors) for some hardware that I am reselling and would like to clone o= ne existing HDD (tailor made) and be able to dump to another new HDD. > =20 > System is running pfSense with FreeBSD 7.2 and soon 8.x=20 >=20 > What would be your suggested method to achieve this goal.=20 >=20 >=20 > Thx.=20 >=20 > =E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93= =E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2= =80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80= =93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93= =E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2= =80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93 > ---------> Gr=C3=A9gory Bernard Director <--------- > ---------------> www.osnet.eu <--------------- > --> Your provider of OpenSource appliances <-- > =E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93= =E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2= =80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80= =93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93= =E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2= =80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93 > OSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetO >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 17:52:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B323B106564A for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:52:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbiquez@intranet.com.mx) Received: from intranet.com.mx (intranet.com.mx [200.33.246.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 701318FC12 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:52:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from PC2.intranet.com.mx (189.144.56.53) by intranet.com.mx with ESMTP (EIMS X 3.3.9) for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 11:53:48 -0600 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 11:52:02 -0600 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Jorge Biquez In-Reply-To: <20101214121018.6fc2b4c1@napoleon> References: <20101214121018.6fc2b4c1@napoleon> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-ID: <3375194028-437632701@intranet.com.mx> Subject: Re: Creating clone of a HDD including boot partition X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:52:11 -0000 Hello. A couple of months I had the same issue to=20 solve... with HDD of my laptop.... one of you=20 guys, thanks, recommend to use clonezilla or=20 clonezilia, it is in sourgeforce projects if I am=20 not wrong. Woked like a charm, 1 bot sector,=20 diferent OS partitions.... took some hours but worked perfectly.... I hope this helps Jorge Biquez At 11:10 a.m. 14/12/2010, you wrote: >Put it in a USB enclosure, and run > >dd in=3D/dev/sourcedisk out=3D/dev/targetdisk bs=3D1M > >Drink coffee until done. > >On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:42:42 +0100 >nagios wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > I have setup a tailored made configuration (1=20 > UFS partition + 1 swap + boot sectors) for some=20 > hardware that I am reselling and would like to=20 > clone one existing HDD (tailor made) and be able to dump to another new= HDD. > > > > System is running pfSense with FreeBSD 7.2 and soon 8.x > > > > What would be your suggested method to achieve this goal. > > > > > > Thx. > > > >=20 >= =AD=AD=AD=AD=AD=AD=AD=AD=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=AD=AD= =AD=AD=AD=AD=AD=AD=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=AD= =AD=AD=AD=AD=AD=AD=E2=80=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=AD=AD=AD= =AD=AD=AD=AD=AD=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=AD=AD=AD=AD=AD= =AD=AD=AD=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=AD=AD=AD=AD >=80=93=E2=80=93 > > ---------> Gr=C3=A9gory Bernard Director <--------- > > ---------------> www.osnet.eu <--------------- > > --> Your provider of OpenSource appliances <-- > >=20 >= =AD=AD=AD=AD=AD=AD=AD=AD=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=AD=AD= =AD=AD=AD=AD=AD=AD=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=AD= =AD=AD=AD=AD=AD=AD=E2=80=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=AD=AD=AD= =AD=AD=AD=AD=AD=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=AD=AD=AD=AD=AD= =AD=AD=AD=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=E2=80=93=AD=AD=AD=AD >=80=93=E2=80=93 > > OSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetO > > > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to=20 > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to= "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 17:57:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CAC0106564A for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:57:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbiquez@intranet.com.mx) Received: from intranet.com.mx (intranet.com.mx [200.33.246.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61E318FC21 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:57:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from PC2.intranet.com.mx (189.144.56.53) by intranet.com.mx with ESMTP (EIMS X 3.3.9) for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 11:59:28 -0600 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 11:57:37 -0600 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Jorge Biquez In-Reply-To: References: <3375127378-437632400@intranet.com.mx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Message-ID: <3375194368-437632703@intranet.com.mx> Subject: Re: Kind of off topic. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:57:50 -0000 At 03:08 a.m. 14/12/2010, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 17:21:06 -0600, Jorge Biquez > wrote: > > Hello all. > > > > A friend is asking me to help him to solve some problem he has in his > > servers. To some I would be able to connect using ssh, with other just > > it i snot possible. I remember that on the windows world there was a > > commercial software PCANywhere. He can have it but I am not sure if I > > would be able to connect to that from my Freebsd machine (of course > > not by ssh). > > > > What are you using for connecting to graphical interfaces of different > > OS's from FreeBSD? > > > > I tested some years ago a VNC software but did not work fine with MAC > > OSX (recently released by then). > > > > I know big security factors are involved for sure. > > Any suggestion on what to use, not to expensive or free? > >If the remote hosts are running FreeBSD, you can do almost *everything* >through SSH. For example most of my FreeBSD-related testing work >happens through SSH connections to virtual machines these days. > >If you really need to run a GUI application though there are a few >options: > > - The most basic is to connect to the remote machine in *some* way, > set the DISPLAY environment variable to point to a local X server > that may accept incoming connections and fire up your GUI program. > > - You can SSH into the remote machine and use the -X or -Y options to > set up 'X forwarding' back to the machine where the SSH connection > has originated from. > > - You can use programs like the NX tools > to set up a 'remotely accessible X desktop' on the target machine > and then use nxclient to connect to it from anywhere. > >The fastest and simplest method is still a plain good old SSH connection >though. It requires minimal setup (an sshd daemon on the remote side), >it is accessible from anywhere in the world, it's secure against random >eavesdroppers, it's fast to connect to, it's pretty light-weight on both >the client and server systems, and you can do _everything_ on the remote >host [even full system upgrades from source]. Hello. Thanks all for your time.... On Freebsd and Linux machines I have entered using SSH already.... and I amtrying to help (my linux knowledge is not so good). :=( Thing is to access the GUI, same screen they have with errors, on their windows and Mac machines (XP and OSX mainly). I am trying to setup one of the VNC solutions around. Just reading befores about security involved in each one. Take care all and have a great day. Jorge Biquez From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 18:03:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C42F3106564A for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:03:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from faust64@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72B6B8FC15 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:03:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so1002963qwj.13 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 10:03:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=GGN7UCesEBUvsQTV0R3eyW90HdI+PbzNDoUqkM7mDMg=; b=F+2bwW1paha5uW6PA1e12dZXl9x6pYmu+vieT1yw8fK+K4IrtutwmRmT8AAz13XHWG 3HkvWisBJjhsFEnnFtdqt5mhrV9sK2LXcbndm84f2sYuEm0K+b6Wt0WLqaoedXcQwp4Z 8RTzswxWcvyF+2vuP1+LDpxPPC+LzIoVnFFkk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=TYMTm+xo2BYoM8VUQJ9T/gYkBzoJeRvIw/lsduFk3agtjMUUfqPI+9bjFt4dvE1G52 /B+dDMLuGXXsqaMu8Wr4PmGVClTBidsWFqQoQyt1ygpH55wbBKMYLmxXm3GQUF22iEsI 2eumb7ZuOOm2e0MjVw1Io2qGWM0uWN8uRoDQE= Received: by 10.229.226.203 with SMTP id ix11mr125089qcb.19.1292349814667; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 10:03:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.235.148 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 10:02:54 -0800 (PST) From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Samuel_Mart=EDn_Moro?= Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 19:02:54 +0100 Message-ID: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: boot, rc script and logs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:03:35 -0000 Hi, I'm adding some scripts to FreeBSD boot. One of this script runs a binary that checks our postgres database, its output being redirected to a dialog --gauge. But I noticed that the dialog output, while correctly displayed on the terminal, is also dumped into /var/log/console.log and /var/log/messages. I'm not even sure about how this is happening... I can't find about message= s nor console.log in /etc/rc* Is there a way to disable log output in a given rc.script? here's my script: #!/bin/sh [...] test "$1" =3D 'start' -o "$1" =3D 'faststart' || exit 0 Prg=3D`basename $_file` exec 2>/var/log/$Prg.log test "$TERM" || export TERM=3Dcons25 DIALOG=3D"/usr/local/bin/dialog --no-collapse --cr-wrap --colors" echo "tty is `tty`" >&2 #debug, prints: tty is /dev/console echo "=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Checking DB 1/2 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D" >&2 dbcheck -s | $DIALOG --gauge "\n Checking DB 1/2" 7 70 2>/dev/null echo "=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Checking DB 2/2 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D" >&2 dbcheck -r -s | $DIALOG --gauge "\n Checking DB 2/2" 7 70 2>/dev/null [...] here is what it gives in /var/log/messages: Dec 14 13:26:46 camtrace13 dhclient: New Subnet Mask (wlan0): 255.255.255.0 Dec 14 13:26:46 camtrace13 dhclient: New Broadcast Address (wlan0): 192.168.0.255 Dec 14 13:26:46 camtrace13 dhclient: New Routers (wlan0): 192.33.160.111 Dec 14 13:26:47 camtrace13 kernel: m ^[[36m^[[44m^[[K^[[16;6H^[[1K ^[[30m^[[40m^[[70X^[[77`^[[36m^[[44m^[[K^[[13;9H^[[39;49m^[[m Dec 14 13:26:48 camtrace13 kernel: m ^[[36m^[[44m^[[K^[[16;6H^[[1K ^[[30m^[[40m^[[70X^[[77`^[[36m^[[44m^[[K^[[13;9H^[[39;49m^[[m Dec 14 13:27:10 camtrace13 kernel: oss_hdaudio0: [ITHREAD] Dec 14 13:27:10 camtrace13 kernel: oss_hdaudio: HDA codec 0x10de0007 not known yet Dec 14 13:27:10 camtrace13 kernel: oss_hdaudio: HDA codec 0x10de0007 not known yet and here is what I can read in /var/log/console.log: Dec 14 13:26:43 camtrace13 kernel: Starting apache. Dec 14 13:26:46 camtrace13 kernel: Starting pgsql. Dec 14 13:26:47 camtrace13 kernel: ^[[m Dec 14 13:26:47 camtrace13 kernel: ^[[39;49m^[[=3D1S Dec 14 13:26:47 camtrace13 kernel: ^[[39;49m^[[m^[[H^[[J^[[17d^[[36m^[[44m^[[1m^[[J^[[H^[[K^[[B^[[K^[[B^[[K^[[= B^[[K^[[B^[[K^[[B^[[K^[[B^[[K^[[B^[[K^[[B ^[[37m^[[47m=DA=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4= =C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4= =C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4^[[m^[= [30m^[[47m=BF^[[m^[[36m^[[44m^[[1m^[[K^[[B ^[[37m^[[47m=B3^[[m^[[30m^[[47m^[[68X^[[74`=B3^[[m^[[30m^[[40m^[[1m ^[[36m^[[44m^[[K^[[B ^[[37m^[[47m=B3^[[m^[[30m^[[47m Checking DB 1/2^[[20X^[[74`=B3^[[m^[[30m^[[40m^[[1m ^[[36m^[[44m^[[K^[[B ^[[37m^[[47m=B3^[[m^[[30m^[[47m ^[[37m^[[47m^[[1m=DA=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4= =C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4= =C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4^[[m^[[30m^[[47m= =BF^[[m^[[30m^[[47m =B3^[[m^[[30m^[[40m^[[1m ^[[36m^[[44m^[[K^[[B ^[[37m^[[47m=B3^[[m^[[30m^[[47m ^[[37m^[[47m^[[1m=B3^[[m^[[34m^[[47m^[[1m^[[31X^[[13;40H0%^[[29X^[[13;71H^[= [m^[[30m^[[47m=B3^[[m^[[30m^[[47m =B3^[[m^[[30m^[[40m^[[1m ^[[36m^[[44m^[[K^[[B ^[[37m^[[47m=B3^[[m^[[30m^[[47m ^[[37m^[[47m^[[1m=C0^[[m^[[30m^[[47m=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4= =C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4= =C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=D9= ^[[m^[[30m^[[47m =B3^[[m^[[30m^[[40m^[[1m ^[[36m^[[44m^[[K^[[B ^[[37m^[[47m=C0^[[m^[[30m^[[47m=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4= =C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4= =C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4= =C4=C4=C4=C4=D9^[[m^[[30m^[[40m^[ Dec 14 13:26:47 camtrace13 kernel: ^[[34m^[[47m^[[1m^[[7m ^[[13;40H^[[m^[[34m^[[47m^[[1m3^[[13;10H^[[39;49m^[[m Dec 14 13:26:47 camtrace13 kernel: ^[[34m^[[47m^[[1m^[[7m ^[[13;39H^[[m^[[34m^[[47m^[[1m11^[[13;15H^[[39;49m^[[m Dec 14 13:26:47 camtrace13 kernel: ^[[34m^[[47m^[[1m^[[7m ^[[13;40H^[[m^[[34m^[[47m^[[1m2^[[13;16H^[[39;49m^[[m Dec 14 13:26:47 camtrace13 kernel: ^[[34m^[[47m^[[1m^[[7m ^[[13;40H^[[m^[[34m^[[47m^[[1m3^[[13;17H^[[39;49m^[[m Dec 14 13:26:47 camtrace13 kernel: ^[[13;40H^[[34m^[[47m^[[1m4^[[13;17H^[[39;49m^[[m Dec 14 13:26:47 camtrace13 kernel: ^[[34m^[[47m^[[1m^[[7m 81% ^[[39;49m^[[m Dec 14 13:26:48 camtrace13 kernel: ^[[13;39H^[[34m^[[47m^[[1m^[[7m96^[[13;59H ^[[39;49m^[[m Dec 14 13:26:48 camtrace13 kernel: ^[[13;40H^[[34m^[[47m^[[1m^[[7m7^[[13;68= H ^[[39;49m^[[m Dec 14 13:26:48 camtrace13 kernel: ^[[13;40H^[[34m^[[47m^[[1m^[[7m8^[[13;69H^[[39;49m^[[m Dec 14 13:26:48 camtrace13 kernel: ^[[13;38H^[[34m^[[47m^[[1m^[[7m100^[[13;69H ^[[39;49m^[[m Dec 14 13:26:48 camtrace13 kernel: ^[[=3DS Dec 14 13:26:48 camtrace13 kernel: ^[[16;77H Dec 14 13:26:48 camtrace13 kernel: ^[[25;1H Dec 14 13:26:48 camtrace13 kernel: ^[[m Dec 14 13:26:48 camtrace13 kernel: ^[[39;49m^[[=3D1S Dec 14 13:26:48 camtrace13 kernel: ^[[39;49m^[[m^[[H^[[J^[[17d^[[36m^[[44m^[[1m^[[J^[[H^[[K^[[B^[[K^[[B^[[K^[[= B^[[K^[[B^[[K^[[B^[[K^[[B^[[K^[[B^[[K^[[B ^[[37m^[[47m=DA=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4= =C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4= =C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4^[[m^[= [30m^[[47m=BF^[[m^[[36m^[[44m^[[1m^[[K^[[B ^[[37m^[[47m=B3^[[m^[[30m^[[47m^[[68X^[[74`=B3^[[m^[[30m^[[40m^[[1m ^[[36m^[[44m^[[K^[[B ^[[37m^[[47m=B3^[[m^[[30m^[[47m Checking DB 2/2^[[20X^[[74`=B3^[[m^[[30m^[[40m^[[1m ^[[36m^[[44m^[[K^[[B ^[[37m^[[47m=B3^[[m^[[30m^[[47m ^[[37m^[[47m^[[1m=DA=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4= =C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4= =C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4^[[m^[[30m^[[47m= =BF^[[m^[[30m^[[47m =B3^[[m^[[30m^[[40m^[[1m ^[[36m^[[44m^[[K^[[B ^[[37m^[[47m=B3^[[m^[[30m^[[47m ^[[37m^[[47m^[[1m=B3^[[m^[[34m^[[47m^[[1m^[[31X^[[13;40H0%^[[29X^[[13;71H^[= [m^[[30m^[[47m=B3^[[m^[[30m^[[47m =B3^[[m^[[30m^[[40m^[[1m ^[[36m^[[44m^[[K^[[B ^[[37m^[[47m=B3^[[m^[[30m^[[47m ^[[37m^[[47m^[[1m=C0^[[m^[[30m^[[47m=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4= =C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4= =C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=D9= ^[[m^[[30m^[[47m =B3^[[m^[[30m^[[40m^[[1m ^[[36m^[[44m^[[K^[[B ^[[37m^[[47m=C0^[[m^[[30m^[[47m=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4= =C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4= =C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4=C4= =C4=C4=C4=C4=D9^[[m^[[30m^[[40m^[ Dec 14 13:26:48 camtrace13 kernel: ^[[34m^[[47m^[[1m^[[7m ^[[13;40H^[[m^[[34m^[[47m^[[1m3^[[13;10H^[[39;49m^[[m Dec 14 13:26:48 camtrace13 kernel: ^[[34m^[[47m^[[1m^[[7m ^[[13;39H^[[m^[[34m^[[47m^[[1m11^[[13;15H^[[39;49m^[[m Dec 14 13:26:48 camtrace13 kernel: ^[[34m^[[47m^[[1m^[[7m ^[[13;40H^[[m^[[34m^[[47m^[[1m2^[[13;16H^[[39;49m^[[m Dec 14 13:26:48 camtrace13 kernel: ^[[34m^[[47m^[[1m^[[7m ^[[13;40H^[[m^[[34m^[[47m^[[1m3^[[13;17H^[[39;49m^[[m Dec 14 13:26:48 camtrace13 kernel: ^[[13;40H^[[34m^[[47m^[[1m4^[[13;17H^[[39;49m^[[m Dec 14 13:26:48 camtrace13 kernel: ^[[34m^[[47m^[[1m^[[7m 81% ^[[39;49m^[[m Dec 14 13:26:48 camtrace13 kernel: ^[[13;39H^[[34m^[[47m^[[1m^[[7m96^[[13;59H ^[[39;49m^[[m Dec 14 13:26:48 camtrace13 kernel: ^[[13;40H^[[34m^[[47m^[[1m^[[7m7^[[13;68= H ^[[39;49m^[[m Dec 14 13:26:48 camtrace13 kernel: ^[[13;40H^[[34m^[[47m^[[1m^[[7m8^[[13;69H^[[39;49m^[[m Dec 14 13:26:48 camtrace13 kernel: ^[[13;38H^[[34m^[[47m^[[1m^[[7m100^[[13;69H ^[[39;49m^[[m Dec 14 13:26:48 camtrace13 kernel: ^[[=3DS Dec 14 13:26:48 camtrace13 kernel: ^[[16;77H Dec 14 13:26:48 camtrace13 kernel: ^[[25;1H Dec 14 13:26:48 camtrace13 kernel: Starting slim. Dec 14 13:26:48 camtrace13 kernel: Starting dhclient and oss seem to dump their output in /var/log/messages, while apache, postgresql and slim dump their one in /var/log/console.log So... How can my rc.script write in both console and messages logs? And how can I get rid of that? Thanks for your help! --=20 Samuel Mart=EDn Moro {EPITECH.} tek5 CamTrace S.A.S (+033) 1 41 38 37 60 1 All=E9e de la Venelle 92150 Suresnes FRANCE "Nobody wants to say how this works. Maybe nobody knows ..." Xorg.conf(5) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 18:13:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D38741065693 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:13:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Ggatten@waddell.com) Received: from mailhost0.waddell.com (mailhost0.waddell.com [12.154.38.61]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93DB98FC20 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:13:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from emlpfilt2.waddell.com (emlpfilt2.waddell.com [10.1.10.30]) by mailhost0.waddell.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D83E508A7; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:13:22 -0600 (CST) Received: from emlpfilt2.waddell.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id E23282F8002; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:13:22 -0600 (CST) Received: from ADVPHTCAS0.wradvisors.com (advphtcas0.wradvisors.com [192.168.203.228]) by emlpfilt2.waddell.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB61D2F8001; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:13:22 -0600 (CST) Received: from WADPMBXV0.waddell.com ([169.254.1.151]) by ADVPHTCAS0.wradvisors.com ([192.168.203.228]) with mapi; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:13:22 -0600 From: Gary Gatten To: 'Jorge Biquez' , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:13:21 -0600 Thread-Topic: Kind of off topic. Thread-Index: AcubuHRtfrQ2ySTLTtCaUvwFrQUSEgAAbUmg Message-ID: <11649_1292350402_4D07B3C2_11649_343_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499A7AF8EDB@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> References: <3375127378-437632400@intranet.com.mx> <3375194368-437632703@intranet.com.mx> In-Reply-To: <3375194368-437632703@intranet.com.mx> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Cc: Subject: RE: Kind of off topic. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:13:33 -0000 It sounds like you're wanting a remote desktop to actually see the active u= sers GUI session? If it's simply to see the error messages, I would recomm= end some sort of centralized logging. There are several tools that take Wi= nblows events and turn them into syslog events. If you "need" remote deskt= op access, perhaps WebEx would help - or as others pointed out an RDP clien= t for *nix should work as well. G -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@f= reebsd.org] On Behalf Of Jorge Biquez Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 11:58 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kind of off topic. At 03:08 a.m. 14/12/2010, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: >On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 17:21:06 -0600, Jorge Biquez=20 > wrote: > > Hello all. > > > > A friend is asking me to help him to solve some problem he has in his > > servers. To some I would be able to connect using ssh, with other just > > it i snot possible. I remember that on the windows world there was a > > commercial software PCANywhere. He can have it but I am not sure if I > > would be able to connect to that from my Freebsd machine (of course > > not by ssh). > > > > What are you using for connecting to graphical interfaces of different > > OS's from FreeBSD? > > > > I tested some years ago a VNC software but did not work fine with MAC > > OSX (recently released by then). > > > > I know big security factors are involved for sure. > > Any suggestion on what to use, not to expensive or free? > >If the remote hosts are running FreeBSD, you can do almost *everything* >through SSH. For example most of my FreeBSD-related testing work >happens through SSH connections to virtual machines these days. > >If you really need to run a GUI application though there are a few >options: > > - The most basic is to connect to the remote machine in *some* way, > set the DISPLAY environment variable to point to a local X server > that may accept incoming connections and fire up your GUI program. > > - You can SSH into the remote machine and use the -X or -Y options to > set up 'X forwarding' back to the machine where the SSH connection > has originated from. > > - You can use programs like the NX tools > to set up a 'remotely accessible X desktop' on the target machine > and then use nxclient to connect to it from anywhere. > >The fastest and simplest method is still a plain good old SSH connection >though. It requires minimal setup (an sshd daemon on the remote side), >it is accessible from anywhere in the world, it's secure against random >eavesdroppers, it's fast to connect to, it's pretty light-weight on both >the client and server systems, and you can do _everything_ on the remote >host [even full system upgrades from source]. Hello. Thanks all for your time.... On Freebsd and Linux machines I have entered using SSH already....=20 and I amtrying to help (my linux knowledge is not so good). :=3D( Thing is to access the GUI, same screen they have with errors, on=20 their windows and Mac machines (XP and OSX mainly). I am trying to=20 setup one of the VNC solutions around. Just reading befores about=20 security involved in each one. Take care all and have a great day. Jorge Biquez _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
"This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email from your system." From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 18:15:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 091F61065697 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:15:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from msabroff@sbcglobal.net) Received: from nm27.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com (nm27.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com [98.139.52.224]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A66968FC1C for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:15:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.139.52.193] by nm27.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Dec 2010 18:03:13 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.153] by tm6.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Dec 2010 18:03:13 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1036.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 14 Dec 2010 18:03:13 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 832975.26446.bm@omp1036.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 56361 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2010 18:03:13 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=IfW+jmkuP8CSgv/7t8RF0HjB+7ZYveGynPOr42qLDa/N8N1NLc+T7Q3NrIh3CVD/qksfvnpEyCnZeewRk4JUsnRnFqiL0i9jWnwWR60YLlc8T3uPydA2w3ZzU2lewElI95i4n4zSzzfwgqI3A+aNY9i92wyzBKqjufOUvoslGrM= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sbcglobal.net; s=s1024; t=1292349793; bh=A+fUVZD1r3FX3TtomMngm7ca3cqc157jyNmIZucCpdw=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=2IOO9KNSTRz937FyNYfjo3FTgQRS/ygUT635aSgiEmA0BZIu5FlGKfUtIHkwElvHhfc8hW2fSDA+ciAOgWX6aGkyPBek+FqW6yYk+sZyJAAEWwATKaeFagj904rWaijqlz5RhhbA1XrVYqQK5QSdD9GRXJOKaBHNscTUJA3qdPQ= Received: from bitmaster.sbcglobal.net (msabroff@76.201.155.35 with plain) by smtp108.sbc.mail.mud.yahoo.com with SMTP; 14 Dec 2010 10:03:12 -0800 PST X-Yahoo-SMTP: qxPS84eswBDXQMciBWqnFk3B71TAaHjplCRZBBgYUAV9_JU- X-YMail-OSG: LT6NKYkVM1nhqEhQC0nbzA31f9XAGXO02cAKVF3a3HrPzWR OcyPNEgC1dZGnNx2a59tFssWsCUiq5gdASkX6WVWPiX5FUgLuD9fLsEL9aSJ .OTbm9hrqnekmHz4l_Eg_b03MV.tU.zHExV8UZH_HbqRaIQiWodmjo1hojB8 yXes9dIhXfr5Dm.bznBaXLxECVganOVcL_ceH3CORsu4PwJUue_sAwxf48eF V6jf3Iic4r4cHd3d8LVvh8I8M9oamgwfnSnU2d1yJHnSAuqld2I7KXZDVd2h _NDZ7bOgDbCbq24kHaYHKJO.O9f7N6SeGznUUOn9PmFu.fbCThKYpJR5yr_. 8qTda3Rj7MgETLH.Xwvh08T1CRWJX6kAZdmiQFxIhzQ-- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Message-ID: <4D07B15F.4030207@sbcglobal.net> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:03:11 -0600 From: Mike Sabroff User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100228) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: [Fwd: Re: /usr/ports/net/pptpclient] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: msabroff@sbcglobal.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:15:33 -0000 Is this the right place to post this question? -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: /usr/ports/net/pptpclient Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 09:41:39 -0800 From: Nicklas Johnson [1] To: [2]msabroff@sbcglobal.net CC: [3]freebsd-java@freebsd.org References: [4]<4D07A1CC.4080406@sbcglobal.net> This list is for discussion of the various Java ports on FreeBSD. Â I don't think it is the correct place for your question about establishing a VPN connection. I suggest trying [5]freebsd-questions@freebsd.org instead. Â Â Nick On 14 December 2010 08:56, Mike Sabroff <[6]msabroff@sbcglobal.net> wrote: I hope this is the correct place to ask about this port. I am trying to get a VPN connection to the office and after googleing, it looked like this would be a good choice for FreeBSD. I am running 7.3-RELEASE FreeBSD. I had no problem building or installing, in fact it was fast and sweet! I followed some documentation I found on the setup and modifying the /etc/resolve.conf file and all went fine until I ran the script to invoke pptp and when it ran I got an error message stating basically that /usr/bin/ip was an unknown command. ip is a linux command but doesn't seem to be part of a default freebsd system. My question is....What if any is the equivalent of ip on freebsd or which port would I install to get ip or it's equivalent? -- Mike Sabroff [7]msabroff@sbcglobal.net 608-877-0676 - Home 608-516-1801 - Cell -- Mike Sabroff [8]msabroff@sbcglobal.net 608-877-0676 - Home 608-516-1801 - Cell _______________________________________________ [9]freebsd-java@freebsd.org mailing list [10]http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[11]freebsd-java-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- "Courage isn't just a matter of not being frightened, you know. It's being afraid and doing what you have to do anyway." Â Â -- Doctor Who - Planet of the Daleks This message has been brought to you by Nick Johnson 2.3b1 and the number 6. -- Mike Sabroff [12]msabroff@sbcglobal.net 608-877-0676 - Home 608-516-1801 - Cell References Visible links 1. mailto:freebsd@spatula.net 2. mailto:msabroff@sbcglobal.net 3. mailto:freebsd-java@freebsd.org 4. mailto:4D07A1CC.4080406@sbcglobal.net 5. mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org 6. mailto:msabroff@sbcglobal.net 7. mailto:msabroff@sbcglobal.net 8. mailto:msabroff@sbcglobal.net 9. mailto:freebsd-java@freebsd.org 10. http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java 11. mailto:freebsd-java-unsubscribe@freebsd.org 12. mailto:msabroff@sbcglobal.net Hidden links: 13. http://healerNick.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 18:18:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC31A106564A for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:18:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbiquez@intranet.com.mx) Received: from intranet.com.mx (intranet.com.mx [200.33.246.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 919B78FC12 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:18:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from PC2.intranet.com.mx (189.144.56.53) by intranet.com.mx with ESMTP (EIMS X 3.3.9) for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:19:44 -0600 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:17:59 -0600 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" From: Jorge Biquez In-Reply-To: <11649_1292350402_4D07B3C2_11649_343_1_D9B37353831173459FDA A836D3B43499A7AF8EDB@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> References: <3375127378-437632400@intranet.com.mx> <3375194368-437632703@intranet.com.mx> <11649_1292350402_4D07B3C2_11649_343_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499A7AF8EDB@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Message-ID: <3375195584-437632712@intranet.com.mx> Subject: RE: Kind of off topic. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:18:07 -0000 Exactly... some of the things I need to help them is an old application they are using developed in house for them... but that does not record teh errors logs... that's why I need to "be seeing" the actual user interface while they are working trying to reproduce the errors they have.... On Mac they are setting up and old version of Timbuktu and that will do the job I guess.... Thanks all. Jorge Biquez At 12:13 p.m. 14/12/2010, Gary Gatten wrote: >It sounds like you're wanting a remote desktop to actually see the >active users GUI session? If it's simply to see the error messages, >I would recommend some sort of centralized logging. There are >several tools that take Winblows events and turn them into syslog >events. If you "need" remote desktop access, perhaps WebEx would >help - or as others pointed out an RDP client for *nix should work as well. > >G > > >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Jorge Biquez >Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 11:58 AM >To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >Subject: Re: Kind of off topic. > > >At 03:08 a.m. 14/12/2010, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > >On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 17:21:06 -0600, Jorge Biquez > > wrote: > > > Hello all. > > > > > > A friend is asking me to help him to solve some problem he has in his > > > servers. To some I would be able to connect using ssh, with other just > > > it i snot possible. I remember that on the windows world there was a > > > commercial software PCANywhere. He can have it but I am not sure if I > > > would be able to connect to that from my Freebsd machine (of course > > > not by ssh). > > > > > > What are you using for connecting to graphical interfaces of different > > > OS's from FreeBSD? > > > > > > I tested some years ago a VNC software but did not work fine with MAC > > > OSX (recently released by then). > > > > > > I know big security factors are involved for sure. > > > Any suggestion on what to use, not to expensive or free? > > > >If the remote hosts are running FreeBSD, you can do almost *everything* > >through SSH. For example most of my FreeBSD-related testing work > >happens through SSH connections to virtual machines these days. > > > >If you really need to run a GUI application though there are a few > >options: > > > > - The most basic is to connect to the remote machine in *some* way, > > set the DISPLAY environment variable to point to a local X server > > that may accept incoming connections and fire up your GUI program. > > > > - You can SSH into the remote machine and use the -X or -Y options to > > set up 'X forwarding' back to the machine where the SSH connection > > has originated from. > > > > - You can use programs like the NX tools > > to set up a 'remotely accessible X desktop' on the target machine > > and then use nxclient to connect to it from anywhere. > > > >The fastest and simplest method is still a plain good old SSH connection > >though. It requires minimal setup (an sshd daemon on the remote side), > >it is accessible from anywhere in the world, it's secure against random > >eavesdroppers, it's fast to connect to, it's pretty light-weight on both > >the client and server systems, and you can do _everything_ on the remote > >host [even full system upgrades from source]. > > >Hello. >Thanks all for your time.... >On Freebsd and Linux machines I have entered using SSH already.... >and I amtrying to help (my linux knowledge is not so good). :=( > >Thing is to access the GUI, same screen they have with errors, on >their windows and Mac machines (XP and OSX mainly). I am trying to >setup one of the VNC solutions around. Just reading befores about >security involved in each one. > >Take care all and have a great day. > >Jorge Biquez > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > > > >
>
>"This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient > and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. > If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that > any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email > and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by > return email and delete this email from your system." > > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 18:21:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4525710657C4 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:21:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ryan.coleman@cwis.biz) Received: from server.cwis.biz (70-89-202-5-invergrove-mn.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [70.89.202.5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E260A8FC12 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:21:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.cwis.biz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.cwis.biz (Postfix) with ESMTP id B16922629EA8; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:21:30 -0600 (CST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cwis.biz Received: from server.cwis.biz ([127.0.0.1]) by server.cwis.biz (server.cwis.biz [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HWd-w1g+AWYd; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:21:28 -0600 (CST) Received: from [10.0.1.5] (70-89-202-1-invergrove-mn.hfc.comcastbusiness.net [70.89.202.1]) by server.cwis.biz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 76DB02629EA7; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:21:28 -0600 (CST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Ryan Coleman X-Priority: 3 In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:21:21 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0019FC51-383A-4CFB-80F2-F7BA42EB27B8@cwis.biz> References: <1560F156-B3C8-4986-980C-8B6175C49683@d3photography.com><740D0EA5-1F2A-486C-B231-11F25BB3AC59@cwis.biz> <4D029FF2.9020305@nrdx.com> <92849C6B31FD4396BBF187F9A6A9E655@GRANTLAPTOP> To: Ryan Coleman X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Cc: Grant Peel , Jerry Bell , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Runaway ProFTP? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:21:25 -0000 And it's fixed now... not sure what the deal was with portsnap but it = finally worked. I appreciate all the help. -- Ryan On Dec 10, 2010, at 10:59 PM, Ryan Coleman wrote: > I have not been able to get portsnap to work at all today. >=20 >=20 > On Dec 10, 2010, at 10:53 PM, Grant Peel wrote: >=20 >> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jerry Bell" >> To: >> Sent: Friday, December 10, 2010 4:47 PM >> Subject: Re: Runaway ProFTP? >>=20 >>=20 >>> I have been having this happen a few times per week for the past few = weeks. I believe it is caused by someone attacking proftpd. I noticed = today that there is an updated version - 1.3.3c that fixes a = vulnerability that they may have been trying to exploit. >>>=20 >>> When I looked at the process list, I would see around 20 proftpd's, = each with a high amount of CPU used, and connected to a specific IP. = I'd firewall off those IPs and kill off proftpd/restart. Knock on wood, = I have not had that happen since upgrading to 1.3.3c, but that may just = be because no one has tried again yet. >>>=20 >>> Jerry >>> On 12/10/2010 4:39 PM, Ryan Coleman wrote: >>>> Does anyone have any ideas? >>>>=20 >>>> On Dec 9, 2010, at 3:12 PM, Ryan Coleman wrote: >>>>=20 >>>>> Dear list, >>>>>=20 >>>>> Has anyone else had experience with ProFTP 1.3.3a running away = with processes? I installed it about 2 months ago with a new server = build and over the course of the last three weeks I've had to forcibly = kill, wait and restart the service every one-to-three days and sucking = up between 20% and 80% of my system resources. >>>>>=20 >>>>> I've attempted to change the logging in hopes to track down what = is causing the problems but I have not been successful. Additionally it = won't connect after a restart through Filezilla but using Terminal on my = MBP it will connect in the CLI. >>>>>=20 >>>>> It's not the end of the world (for me) but it is for my staff when = they have to upload large numbers of photos. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Ryan >>>>>=20 >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>=20 >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>=20 >>=20 >> Indeed, this Proftpd 1.3.3a vulnerability is exactly what my post on = upgrading a single port is all about. I can say for a fact that the = botnets are trying to use the vulnerability and that you are quite = correct that the CPU / ZOMBIE processes are exploit related. >>=20 >> I just upgraded today and so far so good. >>=20 >> \FYI for anyone that is following my thread on updating one single = port: I must have a somwhat busted installation. Using port upgrade = failed ... sorry I did not remember to keep the output, but, I was able = to download the source from proftpd.org and install it from scratch. >>=20 >> -Grant=20 >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 18:22:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40D86106564A for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:22:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@boosten.org) Received: from smtpq4.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq4.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.42.167]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C33318FC18 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:22:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.54.42.145] (helo=smtp14.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq4.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PSZWU-0004Ei-9F; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 19:22:50 +0100 Received: from 541980a1.cm-5-2c.dynamic.ziggo.nl ([84.25.128.161] helo=ra.egypt.nl) by smtp14.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PSZWR-0001ui-Nl; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 19:22:47 +0100 Received: from mbp.egypt.nl (mbp.egypt.nl [192.168.13.33]) by ra.egypt.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66E4D39856; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 19:22:47 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) From: Peter Boosten In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 19:22:47 +0100 Message-Id: <868B0824-7FFC-418A-A267-2A6D025FB4C7@boosten.org> References: <4D0726F2.6070703@boosten.org> To: Chris Brennan X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-ID: 1PSZWR-0001ui-Nl X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-SpamCheck: geen spam, SpamAssassin (niet cached, score=-2.599, vereist 5, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -2.60, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00, SPF_PASS -0.00) X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-From: peter@boosten.org X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating glib from 2.24.2 to 2.26.1_1 fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:22:52 -0000 On 14 dec 2010, at 18:24, Chris Brennan wrote: > t looks like you either specified to include gzip and it cant find the = headers or it's trying to find your gzip headers and can't because they = are in a different location. gzip is in the base system, and there are, AFAICT, no header files for = gzip. gzlibcompressor.c however tries to include zlib.h, and it might or might = not expect something that's in FreeBSD 8.1, but not in 8.0, however I = cannot tell for sure. Anyone can confirm this? btw. Please reply to all to keep it in the list --=20 Peter Boosten http://www.boosten.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 18:40:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFE86106566B for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:40:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout026.mac.com (asmtpout026.mac.com [17.148.16.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93F788FC1E for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:40:51 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp026.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 64bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0LDF008CRL7X2S40@asmtp026.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 10:40:46 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1012140110 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-12-14_11:2010-12-14, 2010-12-14, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: <868B0824-7FFC-418A-A267-2A6D025FB4C7@boosten.org> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 10:40:45 -0800 Message-id: References: <4D0726F2.6070703@boosten.org> <868B0824-7FFC-418A-A267-2A6D025FB4C7@boosten.org> To: FreeBSD - X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Cc: Chris Brennan , Peter Boosten Subject: Re: Updating glib from 2.24.2 to 2.26.1_1 fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:40:51 -0000 On Dec 14, 2010, at 10:22 AM, Peter Boosten wrote: > gzip is in the base system, and there are, AFAICT, no header files for gzip. I regret to disagree :-), but: % head -2 /usr/include/zlib.h /* zlib.h -- interface of the 'zlib' general purpose compression library version 1.2.3, July 18th, 2005 > gzlibcompressor.c however tries to include zlib.h, and it might or might not expect something that's in FreeBSD 8.1, but not in 8.0, however I cannot tell for sure. > > Anyone can confirm this? CVSweb suggests zlib.h header has been part of the system for 14+ years, ie, from FreeBSD-2.x era: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/lib/libz/zlib.h Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 18:51:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3C55106566B for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:51:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@boosten.org) Received: from smtpq3.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq3.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.42.166]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81D2F8FC12 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:51:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.54.42.148] (helo=smtp16.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq3.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PSZyC-0002FF-6H for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 19:51:28 +0100 Received: from 541980a1.cm-5-2c.dynamic.ziggo.nl ([84.25.128.161] helo=ra.egypt.nl) by smtp16.tb.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PSZy1-0004xP-7l for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 19:51:17 +0100 Received: from mbp.egypt.nl (mbp.egypt.nl [192.168.13.33]) by ra.egypt.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F6CB39856; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 19:51:17 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) From: Peter Boosten In-Reply-To: <4D0726F2.6070703@boosten.org> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 19:51:17 +0100 Message-Id: <4CEECEC4-202E-4F7E-8DE1-29E742AEB7FE@boosten.org> References: <4D0726F2.6070703@boosten.org> To: Peter Boosten X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-ID: 1PSZy1-0004xP-7l X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-SpamCheck: geen spam, SpamAssassin (niet cached, score=-2.599, vereist 5, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -2.60, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00, SPF_PASS -0.00) X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-From: peter@boosten.org X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Updating glib from 2.24.2 to 2.26.1_1 fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:51:30 -0000 On 14 dec 2010, at 09:12, Peter Boosten wrote: Okay, did some source code digging, and I believe the actual error = starts here: > gzlibcompressor.c:68: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before > 'gz_header' which, if I interpret all correctly, means that gz_header is no typedef = (or at least, isn't found by the compiler), but this struct actually has = been declared in zlib.h, which is in the #include list of = gzlibcompressor.c The config part of the glib port actually verifies whether zlib.h is = available or not: checking zlib.h usability... yes checking zlib.h presence... yes checking for zlib.h... yes --=20 Peter Boosten http://www.boosten.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 18:53:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C26B01065696 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:53:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@boosten.org) Received: from smtpq4.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net (smtpq4.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net [212.54.34.167]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EDB38FC0C for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:53:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.54.34.133] (helo=smtp2.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net) by smtpq4.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PSZzq-0004HP-0I; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 19:53:10 +0100 Received: from 541980a1.cm-5-2c.dynamic.ziggo.nl ([84.25.128.161] helo=ra.egypt.nl) by smtp2.gn.mail.iss.as9143.net with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PSZzo-0007Ko-Oq; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 19:53:08 +0100 Received: from mbp.egypt.nl (mbp.egypt.nl [192.168.13.33]) by ra.egypt.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58B9839856; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 19:53:08 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) From: Peter Boosten In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 19:53:08 +0100 Message-Id: References: <4D0726F2.6070703@boosten.org> <868B0824-7FFC-418A-A267-2A6D025FB4C7@boosten.org> To: Chuck Swiger X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-ID: 1PSZzo-0007Ko-Oq X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-SpamCheck: geen spam, SpamAssassin (niet cached, score=-2.599, vereist 5, autolearn=not spam, BAYES_00 -2.60, HTML_MESSAGE 0.00, SPF_PASS -0.00) X-ZiggoSMTP-MailScanner-From: peter@boosten.org X-Spam-Status: No Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD - Subject: Re: Updating glib from 2.24.2 to 2.26.1_1 fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:53:11 -0000 On 14 dec 2010, at 19:40, Chuck Swiger wrote: > On Dec 14, 2010, at 10:22 AM, Peter Boosten wrote: >> gzip is in the base system, and there are, AFAICT, no header files = for gzip. >=20 > I regret to disagree :-), but: >=20 > % head -2 /usr/include/zlib.h > /* zlib.h -- interface of the 'zlib' general purpose compression = library > version 1.2.3, July 18th, 2005 >=20 Chuck, Thanks for your answer. I looked for a gzip.h, but obviously didn't find = one :-) >> gzlibcompressor.c however tries to include zlib.h, and it might or = might not expect something that's in FreeBSD 8.1, but not in 8.0, = however I cannot tell for sure. >>=20 >> Anyone can confirm this? >=20 > CVSweb suggests zlib.h header has been part of the system for 14+ = years, ie, from FreeBSD-2.x era: >=20 > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/src/lib/libz/zlib.h >=20 I found indeed no differences between 8.0 and 8.1. --=20 Peter Boosten http://www.boosten.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 18:57:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8A95106566B for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:57:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout030.mac.com (asmtpout030.mac.com [17.148.16.105]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BA1B8FC13 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:57:31 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp030.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-8.01 (built Dec 16 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0LDF00II9LZLMJ00@asmtp030.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 10:57:22 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1012140112 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-12-14_11:2010-12-14, 2010-12-14, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 10:57:21 -0800 Message-id: <8703FA89-A88B-4F86-A84F-AB0ECEDB8A6D@mac.com> References: <4D0726F2.6070703@boosten.org> <868B0824-7FFC-418A-A267-2A6D025FB4C7@boosten.org> To: Peter Boosten X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Cc: FreeBSD - Subject: Re: Updating glib from 2.24.2 to 2.26.1_1 fails X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:57:31 -0000 On Dec 14, 2010, at 10:53 AM, Peter Boosten wrote: >> I regret to disagree :-), but: >> >> % head -2 /usr/include/zlib.h >> /* zlib.h -- interface of the 'zlib' general purpose compression library >> version 1.2.3, July 18th, 2005 > > Chuck, > > Thanks for your answer. I looked for a gzip.h, but obviously didn't find one :-) Indeed. Well, gzip is a primary client of zlib aka /lib/libz.so.X.... Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 21:19:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D20D1065670 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 21:19:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frederic.perrin@resel.fr) Received: from maisel-gw.enst-bretagne.fr (maisel-gw.enst-bretagne.fr [192.44.76.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98FB98FC14 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 21:19:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maisel-gw.enst-bretagne.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 755E319869; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:19:49 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at resel.fr Received: from maisel-gw.enst-bretagne.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercure.adm.maisel.enst-bretagne.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5gmn19EM1zCx; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:19:40 +0100 (CET) Received: from girafe.maisel.enst-bretagne.fr (girafe.maisel.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr [172.23.206.119]) (Authenticated sender: fperrin) by maisel-gw.enst-bretagne.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0981819868; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:19:39 +0100 (CET) Received: by girafe.maisel.enst-bretagne.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BBF52ED245; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:21:34 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Fr=C3=A9d=C3=A9ric_Perrin?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Organization: =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9seau?= des =?utf-8?B?w4lsw6h2ZXM=?= References: <87vd2xogi1.fsf@resel.fr> <20101213161147.GB23305@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> <20101213214317.GA28269@saltmine.radix.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:BaNxH44qxrV2M7LJko0+hKUIbc4= Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:21:34 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20101213214317.GA28269@saltmine.radix.net> (Thomas Dickey's message of "Mon, 13 Dec 2010 16:43:17 -0500") Message-ID: <87aak8m4o1.fsf@resel.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Thomas Dickey Subject: Re: new termcap entry for rxvt-unicode-256color X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 21:19:53 -0000 Le lundi 13 =C3=A0 22:43, Thomas Dickey a =C3=A9crit : > On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 08:11:47AM -0800, Chip Camden wrote: >> Quoth Fr=C3=A9d=C3=A9ric Perrin on Monday, 13 December 2010: >>> rxvt-unicode version 9.09 was released last month. It added support for >>> 256 colors in the default configuration, and the default value of $TERM >>> changed to rxvt-unicode-256color (from rxvt-unicode). > > The 256-colors aren't shown since the corresponding terminfo expression > doesn't map to termcap. (I added a workaround recently in ncurses to > recognize this special case). For example > > xterm+256color|xterm 256-color feature:\ > :cc:\ > :Co#256:pa#32767:\ > :AB=3D\E[48;5;%dm:AF=3D\E[38;5;%dm:Sb@:Sf@: I'm not sure I understand what you mean by "the corresponding expression doesn't map to termcap". Do you mean that FreeBSD's curses library need to be patched to handle 256 colors ? (using 8.1 RELEASE here; ncurses is version 5.7.20081102). However, both Co and pa are documented in termcap(5) as being the number of colors and bg/fg pairs. In addition, I added the following to my termcap file : rxvt-unicode-256color|rxvt-unicode terminal with 256 colors (X Window Syste= m):\ :cc:Co#256:pa#32767:tc=3Drxvt-unicode: When running [1], I do get 256 colors. However, tmux is in black & white (actually, it already was, unless run with something like TERM=3Dxterm-16color tmux new ; but we don't want to lie about $TERM, do we?). [1] http://www.frexx.de/xterm-256-notes/data/256colors2.pl --=20 Fred From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 21:21:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0410106567A for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 21:21:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frederic.perrin@resel.fr) Received: from maisel-gw.enst-bretagne.fr (maisel-gw.enst-bretagne.fr [192.44.76.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD8758FC1B for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 21:21:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maisel-gw.enst-bretagne.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6874919868; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:21:16 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at resel.fr Received: from maisel-gw.enst-bretagne.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercure.adm.maisel.enst-bretagne.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7u71d0Lm9Avy; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:21:07 +0100 (CET) Received: from girafe.maisel.enst-bretagne.fr (girafe.maisel.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr [172.23.206.119]) (Authenticated sender: fperrin) by maisel-gw.enst-bretagne.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 142EE1984A; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:21:06 +0100 (CET) Received: by girafe.maisel.enst-bretagne.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 02F72ED245; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:23:00 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Fr=C3=A9d=C3=A9ric_Perrin?= To: FreeBSD Questions Organization: =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9seau?= des =?utf-8?B?w4lsw6h2ZXM=?= References: <87vd2xogi1.fsf@resel.fr> <20101213161147.GB23305@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:23:00 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20101213161147.GB23305@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> (Chip Camden's message of "Mon, 13 Dec 2010 08:11:47 -0800") Message-ID: <8762uwm4ln.fsf@resel.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Chip Camden Subject: Re: new termcap entry for rxvt-unicode-256color X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 21:21:19 -0000 Le lundi 13 =C3=A0 17:11, Chip Camden a =C3=A9crit : > Quoth Fr=C3=A9d=C3=A9ric Perrin on Monday, 13 December 2010: >> rxvt-unicode version 9.09 was released last month. It added support for >> 256 colors in the default configuration, and the default value of $TERM >> changed to rxvt-unicode-256color (from rxvt-unicode). >>=20 >> This results in slightly incorrect colors, and some programs like vi(1) >> refuse to work. It is my understanding that I should update >> /usr/share/misc/termcap. The diff between rxvt-unicode and >> rxvt-unicode-256color seems rather short; on a Linux machine, I have : > > Take a look at the termcap entry for rxvt-256color. It's actually based = on > rxvt-unicode. So I think that all you need to add is: > > rxvt-unicode-256color|rxvt-unicode with 256 colors:\ > :tc=3Drxvt-256color: I don't have an entry for rxvt-256color. This is happening on 8.1-RELEASE. --=20 Fred From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 21:41:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 004891065674 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 21:41:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frederic.perrin@resel.fr) Received: from maisel-gw.enst-bretagne.fr (maisel-gw.enst-bretagne.fr [192.44.76.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D55A8FC0C for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 21:41:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maisel-gw.enst-bretagne.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 660C019875; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:41:12 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at resel.fr Received: from maisel-gw.enst-bretagne.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercure.adm.maisel.enst-bretagne.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id a+RQxmUSVJr5; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:41:01 +0100 (CET) Received: from girafe.maisel.enst-bretagne.fr (girafe.maisel.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr [172.23.206.119]) (Authenticated sender: fperrin) by maisel-gw.enst-bretagne.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2831619868; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:41:01 +0100 (CET) Received: by girafe.maisel.enst-bretagne.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1AAA8ED245; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:42:56 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Fr=C3=A9d=C3=A9ric_Perrin?= To: FreeBSD Questions Organization: =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9seau?= des =?utf-8?B?w4lsw6h2ZXM=?= References: <87vd2xogi1.fsf@resel.fr> <20101213161147.GB23305@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> <8762uwm4ln.fsf@resel.fr> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:42:56 +0100 In-Reply-To: <8762uwm4ln.fsf@resel.fr> (=?utf-8?B?IkZyw6lkw6lyaWM=?= Perrin"'s message of "Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:23:00 +0100") Message-ID: <871v5km3of.fsf@resel.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Chip Camden Subject: Re: new termcap entry for rxvt-unicode-256color X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 21:41:16 -0000 Le mardi 14 =C3=A0 22:23, Fr=C3=A9d=C3=A9ric Perrin a =C3=A9crit : > Le lundi 13 =C3=A0 17:11, Chip Camden a =C3=A9crit : >> Quoth Fr=C3=A9d=C3=A9ric Perrin on Monday, 13 December 2010: >>> rxvt-unicode version 9.09 was released last month. It added support for >>> 256 colors in the default configuration, and the default value of $TERM >>> changed to rxvt-unicode-256color (from rxvt-unicode). >>>=20 >>> This results in slightly incorrect colors, and some programs like vi(1) >>> refuse to work. It is my understanding that I should update >>> /usr/share/misc/termcap. The diff between rxvt-unicode and >>> rxvt-unicode-256color seems rather short; on a Linux machine, I have : >> >> Take a look at the termcap entry for rxvt-256color. It's actually based= on >> rxvt-unicode. So I think that all you need to add is: >> >> rxvt-unicode-256color|rxvt-unicode with 256 colors:\ >> :tc=3Drxvt-256color: > > I don't have an entry for rxvt-256color. > > This is happening on 8.1-RELEASE. Hum, of course I had the idea of looking at the SVN tree only after sending this post. This rxvt-256color definition was added a couple of weeks ago, by a certain Sterling Camden :-). So, I am now able to say that when adding the following entries to 8.1's termcap file, my terminal works as expected : rxvt-256color|rxvt terminal emulator with 256 colors:\ :Co#256:AF=3D\E[38;5;%dm:AB=3D\E[48;5;%dm:tc=3Drxvt-unicode: rxvt-unicode-256color|rxvt-unicode terminal with 256 colors (X Window Syste= m):\ :tc=3Drxvt-256color: (I even got 256 colors in a screen on a Linux machine accessed inside a tmux running on a FreeBSD machine.) Should I send a PR in order to get this new definition installed? --=20 Fred From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 22:28:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 793CC1065672 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:28:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lobo@bsd.com.br) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C6BD8FC1D for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:28:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gyf3 with SMTP id 3so700109gyf.13 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:28:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.2.20 with SMTP id 20mr7481126agb.69.1292365713017; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:28:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from papi.localnet ([187.78.171.174]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id i22sm257212yhd.42.2010.12.14.14.28.29 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:28:32 -0800 (PST) From: Mario Lobo To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, msabroff@sbcglobal.net Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 19:24:17 -0300 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.1-STABLE; KDE/4.5.2; amd64; ; ) References: <4D07B15F.4030207@sbcglobal.net> In-Reply-To: <4D07B15F.4030207@sbcglobal.net> X-KMail-Markup: true MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-Id: <201012141924.17801.lobo@bsd.com.br> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: /usr/ports/net/pptpclient] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:28:34 -0000 On Tuesday 14 December 2010 15:03:11 Mike Sabroff wrote: > Is this the right place to post this question? > -------- Original Message -------- >=20 > Subject: Re: /usr/ports/net/pptpclient > Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 09:41:39 -0800 > From: Nicklas Johnson [1] > To: [2]msabroff@sbcglobal.net > CC: [3]freebsd-java@freebsd.org > References: [4]<4D07A1CC.4080406@sbcglobal.net> >=20 > This list is for discussion of the various Java ports on FreeBSD. =EF= =BF=BD I > don't think it is the correct place for your question about > establishing a VPN connection. >=20 > I suggest trying [5]freebsd-questions@freebsd.org instead. >=20 > =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD Nick > On 14 December 2010 08:56, Mike Sabroff <[6]msabroff@sbcglobal.net> > wrote: >=20 > I hope this is the correct place to ask about this port. > I am trying to get a VPN connection to the office and after > googleing, it looked like this would be a good choice for FreeBSD. > I am running 7.3-RELEASE FreeBSD. I had no problem building or > installing, in fact it was fast and sweet! > I followed some documentation I found on the setup and modifying > the /etc/resolve.conf file and all went fine until I ran the script > to invoke pptp and when it ran I got an error message stating > basically that /usr/bin/ip was an unknown command. > ip is a linux command but doesn't seem to be part of a default > freebsd system. > My question is....What if any is the equivalent of ip on freebsd or > which port would I install to get ip or it's equivalent? > -- > Mike Sabroff > [7]msabroff@sbcglobal.net > 608-877-0676 - Home > 608-516-1801 - Cell > -- > Mike Sabroff > [8]msabroff@sbcglobal.net > 608-877-0676 - Home > 608-516-1801 - Cell > _______________________________________________ > [9]freebsd-java@freebsd.org mailing list > [10]http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "[11]freebsd-java-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 > -- > "Courage isn't just a matter of not being frightened, you know. It's > being afraid and doing what you have to do anyway." > =EF=BF=BD =EF=BF=BD -- Doctor Who - Planet of the Daleks > This message has been brought to you by Nick Johnson 2.3b1 and the > number 6. >=20 > -- > Mike Sabroff > [12]msabroff@sbcglobal.net > 608-877-0676 - Home > 608-516-1801 - Cell >=20 > References >=20 > Visible links > 1. mailto:freebsd@spatula.net > 2. mailto:msabroff@sbcglobal.net > 3. mailto:freebsd-java@freebsd.org > 4. mailto:4D07A1CC.4080406@sbcglobal.net > 5. mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > 6. mailto:msabroff@sbcglobal.net > 7. mailto:msabroff@sbcglobal.net > 8. mailto:msabroff@sbcglobal.net > 9. mailto:freebsd-java@freebsd.org > 10. http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java > 11. mailto:freebsd-java-unsubscribe@freebsd.org > 12. mailto:msabroff@sbcglobal.net >=20 > Hidden links: > 13. http://healerNick.com/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Give /usr/ports/net/mpd5 a try. I've been using it for a good while now and= it=20 works really well with either a windows server or FreeBSD server. =2D-=20 Mario Lobo http://www.mallavoodoo.com.br =46reeBSD since 2.2.8 [not Pro-Audio.... YET!!] (99% winblows FREE) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 22:28:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A8DB10656D6 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:28:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mkearney@nvita.org) Received: from squirrelserver.nvita.org (nvita.org [173.10.132.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA98D8FC1F for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:28:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from SQUIRRELSERVER.nvita.org ([192.168.0.3]) by SQUIRRELSERVER.nvita.org ([192.168.0.3]) with mapi; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:26:12 -0500 From: "Michael J. Kearney" To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 17:26:31 -0500 Thread-Topic: Kind of off topic. Thread-Index: Acub3OA3Vid+bZijR5+sMIPiTP/nBgAACgDAAAA4zbA= Message-ID: <0A2D7DF01CEBB144ACA1A79F588BD239038C4E7C9586@SQUIRRELSERVER.nvita.org> References: <3375127378-437632400@intranet.com.mx> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: RE: Kind of off topic. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:28:39 -0000 -----Original Message----- From: Michael J. Kearney Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 5:24 PM To: Jorge Biquez Subject: RE: Kind of off topic. ssh to the x-server with xwin32 ... FreeBSD runs with the command: xterm -fn 6x13 -sb -ls -display 192.168.0.2:0 & /usr/local/bin/startxfce4 -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@f= reebsd.org] On Behalf Of Jorge Biquez Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 6:21 PM To: FreeBSD Subject: Kind of off topic. Hello all. A friend is asking me to help him to solve some problem he has in his servers. To some I would be able to connect using ssh, with other just it i snot possible. I remember that on the windows world there was a commercial software PCANywhere. He can have it but I am not sure if I would be able to connect to that from my Freebsd machine (of course not by ssh). What are you using for connecting to graphical interfaces of different OS's from FreeBSD? I tested some years ago a VNC software but did not work fine with MAC OSX (recently released by then). I know big security factors are involved for sure. Any suggestion on what to use, not to expensive or free? Thanks in advance Jorge Biquez _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 22:54:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 608DD1065693 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:54:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mkearney@nvita.org) Received: from squirrelserver.nvita.org (nvita.org [173.10.132.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A3938FC0A for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:54:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from SQUIRRELSERVER.nvita.org ([192.168.0.3]) by SQUIRRELSERVER.nvita.org ([192.168.0.3]) with mapi; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:02:23 -0500 From: "Michael J. Kearney" To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:02:42 -0500 Thread-Topic: Kind of off topic. Thread-Index: AcubHnJn9nFnFy0gRLWlkMwQXEum1wAAFWlQADDewaAAACloEA== Message-ID: <0A2D7DF01CEBB144ACA1A79F588BD239038C4E7C9588@SQUIRRELSERVER.nvita.org> References: <3375127378-437632400@intranet.com.mx> <18842_1292282871_4D06ABF7_18842_173_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499A7AF8ECA@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> <3375128198-437632411@intranet.com.mx> <18842_1292283620_4D06AEE4_18842_399_1_D9B37353831173459FDAA836D3B43499A7AF8ECD@WADPMBXV0.waddell.com> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: RE: Kind of off topic. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:54:02 -0000 sure ... why not logmein.com? lol It doesn't work with playstation 3 ftw -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@f= reebsd.org] On Behalf Of Gary Gatten Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 6:40 PM To: 'Jorge Biquez'; FreeBSD Subject: RE: Kind of off topic. Sorry, I thought all the servers were *nix. Ah... I think there is an ssh sevice for winblows - not 100% sure though. = Any errors that are visible in a GUI app "should" be able to be logged to = syslog, event logs, proprietary log file, etc... Guess that depends on the= app and the developer though! Good luck! -----Original Message----- From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@f= reebsd.org] On Behalf Of Jorge Biquez Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 5:35 PM To: FreeBSD Subject: RE: Kind of off topic. Hello. SSH in some of the servers is acting and working BUT I am assuming some servers won't have it... like some windows based machines.... The Mac's have it but the idea isto have the graphical interface since the errors of the problems they are having are presenting in their graphical applications.... Thanks a lot for you time. I will try to find a VNC that can be used in possible in all. Jorge Biquez At 05:27 p.m. 13/12/2010, you wrote: >Ssh not possible? That's one of the most basic "requirements" and >most easy to secure - typically.... > >XWindows of course, or numerous variants thereof. I'm not sure but >I *think* most of them use the Xwindows protocol on the network. > >VNC may also work now. There are also several versions of it >(TightVNC, RealVNC, et al) There's a native VNC protocol/client as >well as Java/http - maybe https... > >There's probably someone that has written and httpd or Apache module >that will simply pass I/O between a shell process on the box. Maybe >search the ports tree or of course google. > >G > > >-----Original Message----- >From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >[mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of Jorge Biquez >Sent: Monday, December 13, 2010 5:21 PM >To: FreeBSD >Subject: Kind of off topic. > >Hello all. > >A friend is asking me to help him to solve some problem he has in his >servers. To some I would be able to connect using ssh, with other >just it i snot possible. I remember that on the windows world there >was a commercial software PCANywhere. He can have it but I am not >sure if I would be able to connect to that from my Freebsd machine >(of course not by ssh). >What are you using for connecting to graphical interfaces of >different OS's from FreeBSD? >I tested some years ago a VNC software but did not work fine with MAC >OSX (recently released by then). >I know big security factors are involved for sure. >Any suggestion on what to use, not to expensive or free? > >Thanks in advance >Jorge Biquez > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g" > > > > > > >
2.25pt;padding:0in 0in 1.0pt 0in'> >
>"This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient > and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. > If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that > any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email > and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited. If you have > received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by > return email and delete this email from your system." > > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g" _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= "
"This email is intended to be reviewed by only the intended recipient and may contain information that is privileged and/or confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, use, dissemination, disclosure or copying of this email and its attachments, if any, is strictly prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email from your system." _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 23:10:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 640EF10656B1 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:10:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sterling@camdensoftware.com) Received: from wh2.interactivevillages.com (wh2.interactivevillages.com [75.125.250.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 282228FC17 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:10:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 174-21-111-250.tukw.qwest.net ([174.21.111.250] helo=_HOSTNAME_) by wh2.interactivevillages.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PSeoV-0008Cf-6W for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 16:01:48 -0800 Received: by _HOSTNAME_ (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:10:38 -0800 Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:10:38 -0800 From: Chip Camden To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20101214231038.GF2451@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions References: <87vd2xogi1.fsf@resel.fr> <20101213161147.GB23305@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> <8762uwm4ln.fsf@resel.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GLp9dJVi+aaipsRk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8762uwm4ln.fsf@resel.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Company: Camden Software Consulting URL: http://camdensoftware.com X-PGP-Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xD6DBAF91 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - wh2.interactivevillages.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - camdensoftware.com Subject: Re: new termcap entry for rxvt-unicode-256color X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:10:44 -0000 --GLp9dJVi+aaipsRk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Quoth Fr=E9d=E9ric Perrin on Tuesday, 14 December 2010: > Le lundi 13 =E0 17:11, Chip Camden a =E9crit : > > Quoth Fr=E9d=E9ric Perrin on Monday, 13 December 2010: > >> rxvt-unicode version 9.09 was released last month. It added support for > >> 256 colors in the default configuration, and the default value of $TERM > >> changed to rxvt-unicode-256color (from rxvt-unicode). > >>=20 > >> This results in slightly incorrect colors, and some programs like vi(1) > >> refuse to work. It is my understanding that I should update > >> /usr/share/misc/termcap. The diff between rxvt-unicode and > >> rxvt-unicode-256color seems rather short; on a Linux machine, I have : > > > > Take a look at the termcap entry for rxvt-256color. It's actually base= d on > > rxvt-unicode. So I think that all you need to add is: > > > > rxvt-unicode-256color|rxvt-unicode with 256 colors:\ > > :tc=3Drxvt-256color: >=20 > I don't have an entry for rxvt-256color. >=20 > This is happening on 8.1-RELEASE. >=20 > --=20 > Fred It was patched in 8.1-STABLE (now 8.2-PRERELEASE): http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D147726 --=20 Sterling (Chip) Camden | sterling@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F http://camdensoftware.com | http://chipstips.com | http://chipsquips= .com --GLp9dJVi+aaipsRk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNB/luAAoJEIpckszW26+Rk/gH/issW24fmS1AQUrhTccYPsJN v+SlZ8OTj88JWEGK+W6gw3qXnau/K+Z+o9wPglJxT9gEazV8LRZVIdfzMWmO59V0 db1DCa0L3wGG2FE3UkAGFLJ1kEWxvs1oI0kaFfu0FtqqHEm7zslWslEFC5LTUEme JvvOfElTfjFJzKMCQbVqu/9jg5KJCAXFX5xRpALcAgakbJiYIJHampSDy3/CKYuS LPUaYBRSyAhCP3SDc288rBUUk6hRdjGY164gAZ0vD5Y9o2fQroOUAl7OLxkdHfUs Mex2SY4bKhXpzegFQFDJkrETlNgCPmUfkibxi4ZdBus3Z6ubO5uvsoHQlsH1e8Q= =TCG+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GLp9dJVi+aaipsRk-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 14 23:14:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 825B41065672 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:14:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sterling@camdensoftware.com) Received: from wh2.interactivevillages.com (wh2.interactivevillages.com [75.125.250.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 461268FC14 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:14:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 174-21-111-250.tukw.qwest.net ([174.21.111.250] helo=_HOSTNAME_) by wh2.interactivevillages.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PSesS-0000Xn-GJ for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 16:05:53 -0800 Received: by _HOSTNAME_ (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:14:43 -0800 Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:14:43 -0800 From: Chip Camden To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20101214231443.GA41103@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions References: <87vd2xogi1.fsf@resel.fr> <20101213161147.GB23305@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> <8762uwm4ln.fsf@resel.fr> <871v5km3of.fsf@resel.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="17pEHd4RhPHOinZp" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <871v5km3of.fsf@resel.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Company: Camden Software Consulting URL: http://camdensoftware.com X-PGP-Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xD6DBAF91 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - wh2.interactivevillages.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - camdensoftware.com Subject: Re: new termcap entry for rxvt-unicode-256color X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:14:49 -0000 --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Quoth Fr=E9d=E9ric Perrin on Tuesday, 14 December 2010: > Le mardi 14 =E0 22:23, Fr=E9d=E9ric Perrin a =E9crit : > > Le lundi 13 =E0 17:11, Chip Camden a =E9crit : > >> Quoth Fr=E9d=E9ric Perrin on Monday, 13 December 2010: > >>> rxvt-unicode version 9.09 was released last month. It added support f= or > >>> 256 colors in the default configuration, and the default value of $TE= RM > >>> changed to rxvt-unicode-256color (from rxvt-unicode). > >>>=20 > >>> This results in slightly incorrect colors, and some programs like vi(= 1) > >>> refuse to work. It is my understanding that I should update > >>> /usr/share/misc/termcap. The diff between rxvt-unicode and > >>> rxvt-unicode-256color seems rather short; on a Linux machine, I have : > >> > >> Take a look at the termcap entry for rxvt-256color. It's actually bas= ed on > >> rxvt-unicode. So I think that all you need to add is: > >> > >> rxvt-unicode-256color|rxvt-unicode with 256 colors:\ > >> :tc=3Drxvt-256color: > > > > I don't have an entry for rxvt-256color. > > > > This is happening on 8.1-RELEASE. >=20 > Hum, of course I had the idea of looking at the SVN tree only after > sending this post. This rxvt-256color definition was added a couple of > weeks ago, by a certain Sterling Camden :-). So, I am now able to say > that when adding the following entries to 8.1's termcap file, my > terminal works as expected : >=20 > rxvt-256color|rxvt terminal emulator with 256 colors:\ > :Co#256:AF=3D\E[38;5;%dm:AB=3D\E[48;5;%dm:tc=3Drxvt-unicode: >=20 > rxvt-unicode-256color|rxvt-unicode terminal with 256 colors (X Window Sys= tem):\ > :tc=3Drxvt-256color: >=20 > (I even got 256 colors in a screen on a Linux machine accessed inside a > tmux running on a FreeBSD machine.) >=20 > Should I send a PR in order to get this new definition installed? >=20 > --=20 > Fred > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" Yes, preferably with a patch file that only contains your new entry. Just do a diff between the stable version and your final version. I can submit it, if you don't feel like it. --=20 Sterling (Chip) Camden | sterling@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F http://camdensoftware.com | http://chipstips.com | http://chipsquips= .com --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNB/pjAAoJEIpckszW26+RVWwH/RM9pJFIXFFu7F3eZgZdaQJ8 MAQuWhvWhGYuD9W/eO9ph/V2RdxCWIxFXhmPCXXRKhTS0M83/C/qQQB6F9zW0Yoc XwYdyFYXWRx6A1WZXY1ilIHIGDScyHMlskcZCX2TRjBjZ4y98xOP2w11HyAgyaVH OST4FrpJax4LYq+S3TsJmaHmD6OwOG02u0N1x/HVkUEpHZCFM9VYsKzi9YY3Do3+ bXIdtUHArSqgNKn+1m/Zd0wB6PzdBowGMtM29LtQSPS0v8uLOGFyjjsZxm0gE1Y9 WFk39OpKSD9K46E+8mtZgI6gnDEweLN6UuATbqzDk2cabDGkwtXJtRUtq3SRnu0= =+/rl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --17pEHd4RhPHOinZp-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 15 01:44:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65281106564A for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 01:44:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from s_sharma@planetcreations.com) Received: from smtp.net4india.com (smtp.net4india.com [118.67.248.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0D438FC0A for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 01:44:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [115.118.147.227] (helo=VIRTUAL150) by smtp.net4india.com with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PSWd6-000092-8z for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 20:47:28 +0530 From: "Khushi P." To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 20:33:34 +0530 Message-ID: <325276026212180@virtual150> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: General Awarness - Unknown Facts X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: mail@khushiwebworld.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 01:44:30 -0000 Hi, Various unknown facts are listed on the website http://khushiwebworld.= com . The unknown facts are really good an= d I have found it very useful, so thought to share the same with you. = They are categorized as 1. Unknown facts 2. Health Facts 3. Ayurveda facts 4. And Many more . After visiting the website http://khushiwebworld.com you will have awareness towards various unknown facts which= is very useful in day to day life. Regards . Khushi **********************************************************************= *** Khushi World Disclaimer Policy This mail has ben sent to freebsd-questions@freebsd.org dated 09/08= /2010 In case if you have received this email accidently and If you prefer n= ot to receive future emails of this type please UNSUBSCRIBE . If this link does not works reply with the subject "Remove" . =20 **********************************************************************= ****** From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 15 02:31:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69752106566C for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 02:31:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from yxy.716@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f51.google.com (mail-ew0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02FA58FC18 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 02:31:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so919882ewy.10 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:31:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=qrICapHQ7Mg/uTDhCwVryKzmBYtSRjVhmyIBAhNfE/k=; b=HrprKGMYe1/EJYFIz1wkN4xWHc1dbdbKJwyzSrZKSxBigwZ7nTr0GhHDmqujT8wTh/ NAqfWkBef7GsYiWJHhLgqlsSGlqm51vXOT6hiAuGSVLvRor5kRByfPQRbJrS25/yrtgB ktVnWpuzxn22Gfp8NXAWVsJd1S1U2zo6rjP5k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=lg1cHKlm2VW4YgXfrIYPaSyHYT7SjVHw2FSLF/UVTIVibngNwB/+qA0tYOLOBtetKI k7k8Hzi2kmLIfRFd6zZweM3lFB4OAS67xtXuUMZ0Ezwb2nHhZwrNYTOAY/d/whdMa9gN v3UTeWQV24fsRd9ofieDUtTOwLiJR6xW6b9Hg= Received: by 10.213.112.129 with SMTP id w1mr455080ebp.96.1292380281939; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:31:21 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.15.137 with HTTP; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:31:01 -0800 (PST) From: xinyou yan Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 10:31:01 +0800 Message-ID: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: portupgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 02:31:23 -0000 if i use portupgrade -af --patch (it take much times) And i don't finish it Then the second time . i do it again Does it continue or reupgrade anythins The gnome show me i can upgrade some software . However i can't upgrade ,because it can't get information Or how i upgrade . From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 15 02:52:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CE0E106564A for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 02:52:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C169B8FC0A for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 02:52:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so1082982wyf.13 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:52:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+C8rGNaast9xIzM47OLPJj8Jorn0TFCPSHDZPSw71ug=; b=x6nQx1uNLZszxpQHQzQPNTbMIeB2bz13vDNgm2cD1JTkfP7Z2mljSdXh+7QVv+7Bxx xW++uSRifyFPQ3SYTEG6LU39ohL9JXG3Gp0Yxt9xKxpCq+yXEGENNQxvIwu/3GDyXRfo WWvxnGz4YVULz/GyZxgM3Dn76ELZsXjsrH4gw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=CGPuMNt4gvbjS5ZloWSBZaTWRzZbFiyyS3sVxWjtlVUsBTi4fHJuYtKurxjfFmEfpl ubvVZqe461qOlm7ezfJg8Zgqv1TSV/+WJK8c/sgMPYexR+RQMVjTI7F6O7QeOGopTYiv t8Njve43o7WHzmtivfqHN3pmUCchlV5w6jQKM= Received: by 10.216.159.69 with SMTP id r47mr19073wek.105.1292381558738; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:52:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (bb-87-81-140-128.ukonline.co.uk [87.81.140.128]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n11sm562856wej.19.2010.12.14.18.52.36 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 14 Dec 2010 18:52:37 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 02:52:32 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101215025232.158c3da7@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.22.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: portupgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 02:52:40 -0000 On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 10:31:01 +0800 xinyou yan wrote: > if i use portupgrade -af --patch (it take much times) > what's "--patch"? > And i don't finish it > Then the second time . i do it again Does it continue or reupgrade > anythins It starts again. See pkg_glob(1) for how to avoid this. > > The gnome show me i can upgrade some software . > However i can't upgrade ,because it can't get information From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 15 02:54:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E891F106564A for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 02:54:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 425AD8FC0C for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 02:54:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id oBF2sAuA006358; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 13:54:10 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 13:54:09 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Davide Petilli <7h3.k3rn31@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20101214180343.F008310656F6@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20101215132000.O83735@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20101214180343.F008310656F6@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ACPI error message X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 02:54:14 -0000 In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 341, Issue 3, Message: 2 On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:26:35 +0100 Davide Petilli <7h3.k3rn31@gmail.com> wrote: > During the boot I can see these error mesages related to acpi. > I've built my kernel but the error messages come up on the default kernel too. > Does anyone know what is it and how to solve this? > I tried to figure it out by myself without succes. > > These are the relevant parts of my dmesg: > ----------------------------------------- > acpi0: on motherboard > acpi0: [ITHREAD] > acpi0: Power Button (fixed) > unknown: I/O range not supported > ACPI Error: No handler for Region [RAM_] (0xc2cff5c0) [EmbeddedControl] (20100331/evregion-487) > ACPI Error: Region EmbeddedControl(0x3) has no handler (20100331/exfldio-383) > ACPI Error (psparse-0633): Method parse/execution failed [\\_SB_.BAT0._STA] (Node 0xc2cdd5c0), AE_NOT_EXIST > ACPI Error (uteval-0318): Method execution failed [\\_SB_.BAT0._STA] (Node 0xc2cdd5c0), AE_NOT_EXIST > ACPI Error: No handler for Region [RAM_] (0xc2cff5c0) [EmbeddedControl] (20100331/evregion-487) > ACPI Error: Region EmbeddedControl(0x3) has no handler (20100331/exfldio-383) > ACPI Error (psparse-0633): Method parse/execution failed [\\_SB_.BAT0._STA] (Node 0xc2cdd5c0), AE_NOT_EXIST > ACPI Error (uteval-0318): Method execution failed [\\_SB_.BAT0._STA] (Node 0xc2cdd5c0), AE_NOT_EXIST > ----------------------------------------- > > My platform: > > FreeBSD Dragon 8.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE #3: Sun Dec 12 > 01:10:45 CET 2010 root@Dragon:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/DRAGON i386 You should try posting this to the freebsd-acpi list instead, including the full /var/run/dmesg.boot and details of your hardware (make, model); I've not seen an 'INSYDE' ACPI BIOS before, but others may know of it. The first ACPI Error message indicates not being able to access the Embedded Controller (EC), which among other problems that may cause, is why ACPI can't get information on your battery status [\\_SB_.BAT0._STA] There have been recent commits to acpi_ec.c and other ACPI code - you could try booting 8.2-BETA1 from a CD or memstick to see if that helps? - otherwise you're likely to be asked to provide info on your machine's ASL etc. Best to be well prepared first by studying: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/acpi-debug.html cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 15 03:57:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48998106566B for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 03:57:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 904B58FC1D for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 03:57:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id oBF3vVqm009860; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:57:31 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:57:31 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Samuel Mart?n Moro In-Reply-To: <20101214180343.F008310656F6@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20101215140116.M83735@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20101214180343.F008310656F6@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-872814722-1292385451=:83735" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: boot, rc script and logs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 03:57:34 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-872814722-1292385451=:83735 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 341, Issue 3, Message: 17 On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 19:02:54 +0100 Samuel Mart?n Moro wrote: > Hi, > > I'm adding some scripts to FreeBSD boot. > One of this script runs a binary that checks our postgres database, its > output being redirected to a dialog --gauge. > But I noticed that the dialog output, while correctly displayed on the > terminal, is also dumped into /var/log/console.log and /var/log/messages. > > I'm not even sure about how this is happening... I can't find about messages > nor console.log in /etc/rc* As you indicate below, 'tty is /dev/console' while running the boot rc scripts, so it's normal to see these scripts logged to console.log when that's ebabled .. presumably /etc/syslog.conf includes something like: # uncomment this to log all writes to /dev/console to /var/log/console.log console.info /var/log/console.log > Is there a way to disable log output in a given rc.script? > > here's my script: > #!/bin/sh > [...] > test "$1" = 'start' -o "$1" = 'faststart' || exit 0 > Prg=`basename $_file` > exec 2>/var/log/$Prg.log You're redirecting stderr to your logfile, but not stdout, so standard output from the below goes to /dev/console, so also to /console.log > test "$TERM" || export TERM=cons25 > DIALOG="/usr/local/bin/dialog --no-collapse --cr-wrap --colors" > echo "tty is `tty`" >&2 #debug, prints: tty is /dev/console > echo "===== Checking DB 1/2 =====" >&2 The above line is also written to stdout, so to console.log below, so I'm not sure whether your exec usage | syntax | redirection is correct. > dbcheck -s | $DIALOG --gauge "\n Checking DB 1/2" 7 70 2>/dev/null > echo "===== Checking DB 2/2 =====" >&2 > dbcheck -r -s | $DIALOG --gauge "\n Checking DB 2/2" 7 70 2>/dev/null > [...] > > here is what it gives in /var/log/messages: > Dec 14 13:26:46 camtrace13 dhclient: New Subnet Mask (wlan0): 255.255.255.0 > Dec 14 13:26:46 camtrace13 dhclient: New Broadcast Address (wlan0): > 192.168.0.255 > Dec 14 13:26:46 camtrace13 dhclient: New Routers (wlan0): 192.33.160.111 > Dec 14 13:26:47 camtrace13 kernel: m ^[[36m^[[44m^[[K^[[16;6H^[[1K > ^[[30m^[[40m^[[70X^[[77`^[[36m^[[44m^[[K^[[13;9H^[[39;49m^[[m > Dec 14 13:26:48 camtrace13 kernel: m ^[[36m^[[44m^[[K^[[16;6H^[[1K > ^[[30m^[[40m^[[70X^[[77`^[[36m^[[44m^[[K^[[13;9H^[[39;49m^[[m I don't know why those two dialog lines are sent to /var/log/messages; perhaps they indicate some error, only those being logged with *.notice? [..] > and here is what I can read in /var/log/console.log: > Dec 14 13:26:43 camtrace13 kernel: Starting apache. > Dec 14 13:26:46 camtrace13 kernel: Starting pgsql. If you view these scripts you'll see that they don't themselves write to stdout .. it's the rc system logging these. > Dec 14 13:26:47 camtrace13 kernel: ^[[m > Dec 14 13:26:47 camtrace13 kernel: ^[[39;49m^[[=1S > Dec 14 13:26:47 camtrace13 kernel: > ^[[39;49m^[[m^[[H^[[J^[[17d^[[36m^[[44m^[[1m^[[J^[[H^[[K^[[B^[[K^[[B^[[K^[[B^[[K^[[B^[[K^[[B^[[K^[[B^[[K^[[B^[[K^[[B > ^[[37m^[[47mÚÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ^[[m^[[30m^[[47m¿^[[m^[[36m^[[44m^[[1m^[[K^[[B > ^[[37m^[[47m³^[[m^[[30m^[[47m^[[68X^[[74`³^[[m^[[30m^[[40m^[[1m > ^[[36m^[[44m^[[K^[[B ^[[37m^[[47m³^[[m^[[30m^[[47m Checking DB > 1/2^[[20X^[[74`³^[[m^[[30m^[[40m^[[1m ^[[36m^[[44m^[[K^[[B [..] > Dec 14 13:26:48 camtrace13 kernel: Starting slim. > Dec 14 13:26:48 camtrace13 kernel: Starting You'll need to rework this somehow so dialog's stdout isn't written to /dev/console, though that may seem necessary if you want it coming up on the VTY0 boot screen. It may involve decoupling this task from running 'inline' as a boot script somehow, or else making sure that output is redirected to a log or temporary file instead of directly into dialog. > dhclient and oss seem to dump their output in /var/log/messages, while > apache, postgresql and slim dump their one in /var/log/console.log > So... How can my rc.script write in both console and messages logs? > And how can I get rid of that? dhclient's (running) output is normally logged to messages, whereas the 'Starting' messages are output of the rc process as it launches things. And it's only those couple of lines to messages, the rest of them to console.log is unsurprising and expected if they're written to stdout. HTH a bit, Ian --0-872814722-1292385451=:83735-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 15 04:49:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 876F2106566B for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 04:49:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frederic.perrin@resel.fr) Received: from maisel-gw.enst-bretagne.fr (maisel-gw.enst-bretagne.fr [192.44.76.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A1298FC12 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 04:49:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by maisel-gw.enst-bretagne.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id C603519869 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 05:49:04 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at resel.fr Received: from maisel-gw.enst-bretagne.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mercure.adm.maisel.enst-bretagne.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VBNIT7rITXt9 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 05:48:58 +0100 (CET) Received: from girafe.maisel.enst-bretagne.fr (girafe.maisel.rennes.enst-bretagne.fr [172.23.206.119]) (Authenticated sender: fperrin) by maisel-gw.enst-bretagne.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 583D01984A for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 05:48:58 +0100 (CET) Received: by girafe.maisel.enst-bretagne.fr (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AF058ED245; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 05:50:57 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Fr=C3=A9d=C3=A9ric_Perrin?= To: FreeBSD Questions Organization: =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=A9seau?= des =?utf-8?B?w4lsw6h2ZXM=?= References: <87vd2xogi1.fsf@resel.fr> <20101213161147.GB23305@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> <8762uwm4ln.fsf@resel.fr> <871v5km3of.fsf@resel.fr> <20101214231443.GA41103@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 05:50:57 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20101214231443.GA41103@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> (Chip Camden's message of "Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:14:43 -0800") Message-ID: <87sjxzljv2.fsf@resel.fr> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: new termcap entry for rxvt-unicode-256color X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 04:49:06 -0000 Le mercredi 15 =C3=A0 0:14, Chip Camden a =C3=A9crit : > Quoth Fr=C3=A9d=C3=A9ric Perrin on Tuesday, 14 December 2010: >> So, I am now able to say that when adding the following entries to >> 8.1's termcap file, my terminal works as expected : >>=20 >> rxvt-256color|rxvt terminal emulator with 256 colors:\ >> :Co#256:AF=3D\E[38;5;%dm:AB=3D\E[48;5;%dm:tc=3Drxvt-unicode: >>=20 >> rxvt-unicode-256color|rxvt-unicode terminal with 256 colors (X Window Sy= stem):\ >> :tc=3Drxvt-256color: >>=20 >> Should I send a PR in order to get this new definition installed? > > Yes, preferably with a patch file that only contains your new entry. > Just do a diff between the stable version and your final version. I can > submit it, if you don't feel like it. Done, as conf/153164. --=20 Fred From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 15 05:01:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 664F41065670 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 05:01:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave-freebsd@pooserville.com) Received: from smtp.pooserville.com (mail.pooserville.com [69.26.223.253]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19F408FC16 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 05:01:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=mail.pooserville.com) by smtp.pooserville.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id LDGDYA-000GQY-A3 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:01:22 -0600 Received: from [76.183.154.180] (account dave-sa@pooserville.com HELO [192.168.74.51]) by mail.pooserville.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2.10) with ESMTP-TLS id 893135 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:01:20 -0600 User-Agent: Microsoft-Entourage/12.28.0.101117 Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:01:18 -0600 From: Dave Pooser To: Message-ID: Thread-Topic: PostgreSQL + 8.1 RELEASE + DTrace = pain? Thread-Index: AcuVz639rsiDJ1FSPkeg4RO2zsiDiAGRW2Gu In-Reply-To: Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: PostgreSQL + 8.1 RELEASE + DTrace = pain? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 05:01:23 -0000 On 12/6/10 11:29 PM, "Dave Pooser" wrote: > I used pkg_delete to > remove the postgresql packages (server and client), recompiled the kernel to > include DTrace and eliminate some unused drivers, updated loader.conf to > bring up dtraceall at boot, did a make clean and a make config to add > DTrace, and built postgresql90-server again. It appeared to work fine, but > now I'm getting segfaults when I try to launch it. Is there a better place I could/should be asking questions about PostgreSQL and DTrace on FreeBSD? Or is this combination still black magic at this point? -- Dave Pooser Cat-Herder-in-Chief, Pooserville.com "...Life is not a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in one pretty and well-preserved piece, but to slide across the finish line broadside, thoroughly used up, worn out, leaking oil, and shouting GERONIMO!!!" -- Bill McKenna From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 15 05:49:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C41E11065675 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 05:49:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sterling@camdensoftware.com) Received: from wh2.interactivevillages.com (wh2.interactivevillages.com [75.125.250.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 879318FC1D for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 05:49:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 97-126-28-84.tukw.qwest.net ([97.126.28.84] helo=_HOSTNAME_) by wh2.interactivevillages.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PSl2e-0006wK-6J for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 22:40:49 -0800 Received: by _HOSTNAME_ (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Tue, 14 Dec 2010 21:49:41 -0800 Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 21:49:41 -0800 From: Chip Camden To: FreeBSD Questions Message-ID: <20101215054941.GA43842@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> Mail-Followup-To: FreeBSD Questions References: <87vd2xogi1.fsf@resel.fr> <20101213161147.GB23305@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> <8762uwm4ln.fsf@resel.fr> <871v5km3of.fsf@resel.fr> <20101214231443.GA41103@libertas.local.camdensoftware.com> <87sjxzljv2.fsf@resel.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UugvWAfsgieZRqgk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87sjxzljv2.fsf@resel.fr> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Company: Camden Software Consulting URL: http://camdensoftware.com X-PGP-Key: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xD6DBAF91 X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - wh2.interactivevillages.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - camdensoftware.com Subject: Re: new termcap entry for rxvt-unicode-256color X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 05:49:47 -0000 --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Quoth Fr=E9d=E9ric Perrin on Wednesday, 15 December 2010: > Le mercredi 15 =E0 0:14, Chip Camden a =E9crit : > > Quoth Fr=E9d=E9ric Perrin on Tuesday, 14 December 2010: > >> So, I am now able to say that when adding the following entries to > >> 8.1's termcap file, my terminal works as expected : > >>=20 > >> rxvt-256color|rxvt terminal emulator with 256 colors:\ > >> :Co#256:AF=3D\E[38;5;%dm:AB=3D\E[48;5;%dm:tc=3Drxvt-unicode: > >>=20 > >> rxvt-unicode-256color|rxvt-unicode terminal with 256 colors (X Window = System):\ > >> :tc=3Drxvt-256color: > >>=20 > >> Should I send a PR in order to get this new definition installed? > > > > Yes, preferably with a patch file that only contains your new entry. > > Just do a diff between the stable version and your final version. I can > > submit it, if you don't feel like it. >=20 > Done, as conf/153164. >=20 > --=20 > Fred > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" tr=E8s bien! --=20 Sterling (Chip) Camden | sterling@camdensoftware.com | 2048D/3A978E4F http://camdensoftware.com | http://chipstips.com | http://chipsquips= .com --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNCFb1AAoJEIpckszW26+RnowIAJoYEnNqF6FUl1C4NYbt5cFK 7HgRaVpUnhX2Y71IJsSmz34XTZIIq2eHCQ9nPPKjPffiMPtEdu3A+d6kHJQtpwVJ b+XkPfnPkf524PLg457/RWDuUCGDIhpQxupee0iPR0j03mVGHLd5fPosEqWue4Fk yPq72sRUhe9COtq3wijvmu0IuEMAi/cbZbaqNAnruqTVGMiGhg21Dc79qe+7P5PV 2+qbWmB6ZCdb372B1m0yi0sNLrT2/AiNPmyYiD7NqzqviHvUSVR8GXxjaIuBln19 Rh6gtC92NsPwcS0FWvKXmXrVstmzNwbc9Hh8Nm1827xYtRWMljqiIeiL/Eoi6mI= =pPyj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UugvWAfsgieZRqgk-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 15 07:11:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 023A4106564A for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 07:11:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout026.mac.com (asmtpout026.mac.com [17.148.16.101]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD2F88FC0A for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 07:11:39 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Received: from [17.151.87.195] by asmtp026.mac.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 64bit)) with ESMTPSA id <0LDG005GZJYQ9X30@asmtp026.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:11:33 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1012140257 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-12-15_03:2010-12-14, 2010-12-14, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:11:10 -0800 Message-id: <77F6EE21-0872-4B6F-A534-07911A520FAB@mac.com> References: To: Dave Pooser X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: PostgreSQL + 8.1 RELEASE + DTrace = pain? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 07:11:40 -0000 On Dec 14, 2010, at 9:01 PM, Dave Pooser wrote: > Is there a better place I could/should be asking questions about PostgreSQL > and DTrace on FreeBSD? Or is this combination still black magic at this > point? freebsd-ports@ is a reasonable alternative (since PostgreSQL is a port), but freebsd-questions@ is the best place to ask "mixed" questions, where the issue involves a combination of base system, ports, etc. However, you should be able to run the thing under gdb, or debug a corefile which was previously generated, and gain more information about what is going wrong. IMO, doing SQL query tracing and optimization is much more likely to produce tunable performance improvements than working at the DTrace level.... Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 15 07:46:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4AA310656A5 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 07:46:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 7h3.k3rn31@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54EB58FC12 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 07:46:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so1205499wyf.13 for ; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:46:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:mail-followup-to:references:mime-version:content-type :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=T3eOfBNR3ZZPKzGUFa9udkYF1aZnXASolNJR0FlWOpU=; b=pV3jHWq7pjRLZqey00z0IL2dhjfv4AADhEqPkjEgM5Efm44oGXNYx3N8c2QKwHwGdT MVvJWbjRk/PrINXVOux9U7ALr3F1OhHQM65zEPzOZKr8WijUsxK0SYVFtEXkR75n3c4E US+Vx+drehxMS+r2vzoCLuddueSRCmiL705lY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:mail-followup-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; b=VCpF2xUHLtUCZlRgmBdaWuvcmuXOGc7RdtMnyeIoIedo/leuyaTUIRLfDdiG0mcWiB up+stTb0vPdAqGvhFmBHepPpOsM9L/Xvz1Dd928y1f3JwmibdRARSqPpUtujssy2yyof gMf8a89zXZkCXVeAoneyoNakekOGTQzvYaj6M= Received: by 10.216.17.204 with SMTP id j54mr346036wej.108.1292399176059; Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:46:16 -0800 (PST) Received: from gmail.com (host148-155-dynamic.16-87-r.retail.telecomitalia.it [87.16.155.148]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id o33sm696730wej.37.2010.12.14.23.46.15 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 14 Dec 2010 23:46:15 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 09:46:09 +0100 From: Davide Petilli <7h3.k3rn31@gmail.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101215084608.GA1561@gmail.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101214180343.F008310656F6@hub.freebsd.org> <20101215132000.O83735@sola.nimnet.asn.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101215132000.O83735@sola.nimnet.asn.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: ACPI error message X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 07:46:17 -0000 On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 01:54:09PM +1100, Ian Smith wrote: > the full /var/run/dmesg.boot and details of your hardware (make, model); > I've not seen an 'INSYDE' ACPI BIOS before, but others may know of it. > > The first ACPI Error message indicates not being able to access the > Embedded Controller (EC), which among other problems that may cause, is > why ACPI can't get information on your battery status [\\_SB_.BAT0._STA] > > There have been recent commits to acpi_ec.c and other ACPI code - you > could try booting 8.2-BETA1 from a CD or memstick to see if that helps? > - otherwise you're likely to be asked to provide info on your machine's > ASL etc. Best to be well prepared first by studying: > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/acpi-debug.html > > cheers, Ian Thank you very much! I'll study the linked resource well, next I'll post on the acpi mailing list. Regards -- Davide Petili - "k3rn31" Potenza, Italy FreeBSD, Mac OSX, GNU/Debian. Geek since birth. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 15 08:00:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3437D106566B for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 08:00:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (ns2.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92B368FC15 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 08:00:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.3/rdb1) id oBF80FRf015357 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 02:00:15 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 02:00:15 -0600 (CST) From: Robert Bonomi Message-ID: <201012150800.oBF80FRf015357@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Creating clone of a HDD including boot partition X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 08:00:17 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Dec 14 09:01:02 2010 > From: nagios > Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:42:42 +0100 > To: Liste FreeBSD > Subject: Creating clone of a HDD including boot partition > > Hello, > > I have setup a tailored made configuration (1 UFS partition + 1 > swap + boot sectors) for some hardware that I am reselling and > would like to clone one existing HDD (tailor made) and be able to > dump to another new HDD. > > System is running pfSense with FreeBSD 7.2 and soon 8.x > > What would be your suggested method to achieve this goal. *IF* the disks are the same size/geometry, then simply dd(1) from one raw device to the other. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 15 08:46:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B897F106564A for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 08:46:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sa@mbg.se) Received: from server3.mbg.se (c-7-202-233-83.cust.bredband2.com [83.233.202.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45DF98FC16 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 08:46:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dator6.hbg.mbg.se (server7 [83.233.202.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by server3.mbg.se (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBF8kSGf040705 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 09:46:29 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sa@mbg.se) Message-ID: <4D088064.4090907@mbg.se> Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 09:46:28 +0100 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sven-=C5ke_Svensson?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; sv-SE; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101213 Thunderbird/3.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: User Questions References: <4D0231E1.6010105@mbg.se> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=unavailable version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on server3.mbg.se Subject: Re: ZFS over nfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 08:46:34 -0000 Ok, thank you. If I understand what you say there could be an administrative mess but no real problem with the file system. Regards Sven-Åke 2010-12-10 16:09, krad skrev: > > > On 10 December 2010 13:57, Sven-Åke Svensson > wrote: > > Hi > > > I have a file server with an zfs system. I have set up nfs shares > using "zfs nfsshare...." as it says in the documentation. Then the > system use the file /etc/zfs/exports. > > But I find out that I also can share this directories using the > standard /etc/exports. This way I have all administration of shares > in the same place. But are there any disadvantages doing it this > way? Anybody know? > > System is Freebsd 8.1. > > > Best regards > > Sven-Åke Svensson > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org > " > > > > if you put it in exports zfs cant manage it, therefore the zfs > filesystem set command becomes redundent and inoperative, so it doesnt > fit in with zfs standard way of doing things. Not really an issue but > possibly a little confusing. > > I know its not necessary the case for bsd yet, but on solaris if you > have made the jump to zfs, you have most likely gone for a pure zfs > installation, therefore it all hangs together nicely. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 15 13:29:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFC7A106566B for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 13:29:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matt@webcontracts.co.uk) Received: from batfink.vm.bytemark.co.uk (batfink.vm.bytemark.co.uk [80.68.95.231]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9565B8FC0A for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 13:29:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from www.webcontracts.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by batfink.vm.bytemark.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F7FA640FE for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 13:11:09 +0000 (GMT) Received: from 212.159.19.37 (SquirrelMail authenticated user mlaw) by www.webcontracts.co.uk with HTTP; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 13:11:10 -0000 Message-ID: <0ec066ac2fd5161d5f3715c6a0c776d6.squirrel@www.webcontracts.co.uk> Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 13:11:10 -0000 From: "Matthew Law" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.19 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Subject: FTP server link aggregation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: matt@webcontracts.co.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 13:29:13 -0000 I have a single FreeBSD box acting as an FTP server for multiple FreeBSD and Linux clients on the same /24 subnet (all gigabit ethernet). It is currently connected by just one of it's two gig ethernet ports. I also have two cisco switches with an etherchannel between them (using 2 x gig ports on each switch). I would like to connect the remaining NIC on my FreeBSD box to the other switch and enable 802.3ad on those switch ports to aggregate traffic between them. This is in the hope that it can better serve multiple FTP clients. Is my thinking correct? Other than the network interface changes which are documented here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-aggregation.html are there any further tweaks I could make to improve things? -the server is a 'standard install' and does not use ZFS. It has an adaptec 5408 RAID card with 4 x SATA II drives and, IIRC, 128K stripe size and plenty of RAM. Is there a way of testing this other than initiating large file transfers to this server from multiple hosts? Many thanks, Matt. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 15 14:31:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6911C1065673 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:31:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29F9E8FC12 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:31:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-134-77.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.134.77]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D66543CE40 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:31:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id oBFEV3Pw001560 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:31:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:31:03 +0100 From: Polytropon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20101215153103.ae1fb1ef.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <201012150800.oBF80FRf015357@mail.r-bonomi.com> References: <201012150800.oBF80FRf015357@mail.r-bonomi.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Creating clone of a HDD including boot partition X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:31:05 -0000 On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 02:00:15 -0600 (CST), Robert Bonomi wrote: > > What would be your suggested method to achieve this goal. > > *IF* the disks are the same size/geometry, then simply dd(1) from one raw > device to the other. And if it's not, use the recommended standard transfer method of dump + restore. Before you can do so, run a script (e. g. from a live system CD) to perform the slicing and partitioning according to your needs (fdisk, disklabel/bsdlabel, newfs, tunefs, or geom tools, or zfs tools). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 15 14:43:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 624DD106564A for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:43:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from faust64@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C0668FC0C for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:43:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so2048132qwj.13 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 06:43:10 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=bV2xoD29YZCjJflgpy7Q99ZlB3C0W0iHJMciZSXIe+Q=; b=cbaWmvdF0AAhb5w28krzpTilkuKLNLqrsVbUm3gaKbr9W3TEQZR9UI/3F6GXxaqz7g 2Q2XbjnKRS/528dUUBc8DpP0Txrl5rwglf8jtH5jqnujRxRiO0NhUnkfRSwMySG0XE5O RDtkBiW1t2okw2KmV8b/tknoVHqHo+/a8WXKc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=I8DAb3fj++Dv0i5U8oNKYvhZ7B2MuFaVBHgXWKwyKEVnk6ujO/l9Tx6DQkGQDx7lyb 4aIyez0GX7x7bb4o3BFdr2Jrym7qo9saqVOcyxKI9j4svGKfY2//k6gyqvJEBSjMBug0 Qz3isIk/xeIQmOj+zkVA87vqteQ+G9t/n63kA= Received: by 10.229.235.142 with SMTP id kg14mr609211qcb.133.1292424189834; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 06:43:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.235.148 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 06:42:29 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101215140116.M83735@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20101214180343.F008310656F6@hub.freebsd.org> <20101215140116.M83735@sola.nimnet.asn.au> From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Samuel_Mart=EDn_Moro?= Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:42:29 +0100 Message-ID: To: Ian Smith Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: boot, rc script and logs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:43:11 -0000 On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 4:57 AM, Ian Smith wrote: > In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 341, Issue 3, Message: 17 > On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 19:02:54 +0100 Samuel Mart?n Moro > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm adding some scripts to FreeBSD boot. > > One of this script runs a binary that checks our postgres database, it= s > > output being redirected to a dialog --gauge. > > But I noticed that the dialog output, while correctly displayed on the > > terminal, is also dumped into /var/log/console.log and > /var/log/messages. > > > > I'm not even sure about how this is happening... I can't find about > messages > > nor console.log in /etc/rc* > > As you indicate below, 'tty is /dev/console' while running the boot rc > scripts, so it's normal to see these scripts logged to console.log when > that's ebabled .. presumably /etc/syslog.conf includes something like: > # uncomment this to log all writes to /dev/console to /var/log/console.lo= g > console.info /var/log/console.log > indeed it does. > > > Is there a way to disable log output in a given rc.script? > > > > here's my script: > > #!/bin/sh > > [...] > > test "$1" =3D 'start' -o "$1" =3D 'faststart' || exit 0 > > Prg=3D`basename $_file` > > exec 2>/var/log/$Prg.log > > You're redirecting stderr to your logfile, but not stdout, so standard > output from the below goes to /dev/console, so also to /console.log > > > test "$TERM" || export TERM=3Dcons25 > > DIALOG=3D"/usr/local/bin/dialog --no-collapse --cr-wrap --colo= rs" > > echo "tty is `tty`" >&2 #debug, prints: tty is /dev/console > > echo "=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Checking DB 1/2 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D" >&2 > > The above line is also written to stdout, so to console.log below, so > I'm not sure whether your exec usage | syntax | redirection is correct. > it is dialog is used to display menus using curses during the boot process, everything "looks" fine (except for logs), menus are correctly displayed, while processing the DB scan. > > > dbcheck -s | $DIALOG --gauge "\n Checking DB 1/2" 7 70 > 2>/dev/null > > echo "=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Checking DB 2/2 =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D" >&2 > > dbcheck -r -s | $DIALOG --gauge "\n Checking DB 2/2" 7 70 > 2>/dev/null > > [...] > > > > here is what it gives in /var/log/messages: > > Dec 14 13:26:46 camtrace13 dhclient: New Subnet Mask (wlan0): > 255.255.255.0 > > Dec 14 13:26:46 camtrace13 dhclient: New Broadcast Address (wlan0): > > 192.168.0.255 > > Dec 14 13:26:46 camtrace13 dhclient: New Routers (wlan0): 192.33.160.1= 11 > > Dec 14 13:26:47 camtrace13 kernel: m ^[[36m^[[44m^[[K^[[16;6H^[[1K > > ^[[30m^[[40m^[[70X^[[77`^[[36m^[[44m^[[K^[[13;9H^[[39;49m^[[m > > Dec 14 13:26:48 camtrace13 kernel: m ^[[36m^[[44m^[[K^[[16;6H^[[1K > > ^[[30m^[[40m^[[70X^[[77`^[[36m^[[44m^[[K^[[13;9H^[[39;49m^[[m > > I don't know why those two dialog lines are sent to /var/log/messages; > perhaps they indicate some error, only those being logged with *.notice? > this lines are mostly color code, used to display a grey window with a gauge, on a blue background. > > [..] > > > and here is what I can read in /var/log/console.log: > > Dec 14 13:26:43 camtrace13 kernel: Starting apache. > > Dec 14 13:26:46 camtrace13 kernel: Starting pgsql. > > If you view these scripts you'll see that they don't themselves write to > stdout .. it's the rc system logging these. > indeed, I noticed yesterday that "Starting ${name}" is part of rc.subr > > > Dec 14 13:26:47 camtrace13 kernel: ^[[m > > Dec 14 13:26:47 camtrace13 kernel: ^[[39;49m^[[=3D1S > > Dec 14 13:26:47 camtrace13 kernel: > > > ^[[39;49m^[[m^[[H^[[J^[[17d^[[36m^[[44m^[[1m^[[J^[[H^[[K^[[B^[[K^[[B^[[K^= [[B^[[K^[[B^[[K^[[B^[[K^[[B^[[K^[[B^[[K^[[B > * > ^[[37m^[[**47m=E8=B0=80=E5=93=AA=E5=93=AA=E5=93=AA=E5=93=AA=E5=93=AA= =E5=93=AA=E5=93=AA=E5=93=AA=E5=93=AA=E5=93=AA=E5=93=AA=E5=93=AA=E5=93=AA=E5= =93=AA=E5=93=AA=E5=93=AA=E5=93=AA=E5=93=AA=E5=93=AA=E5=93=AA=E5=93=AA=E5=93= =AA=E5=93=AA=E5=93=AA=E5=93=AA=E5=93=AA** > =E5=93=AA=E5=93=AA=E5=93=AA=E5=93=AA=E5=93=AA=E5=93=AA=E5=93=AA=E8=85=B2[= [m^[[30m^[[47m=E7=B8=99[[m^[[**36m^[[44m^[[1m^[[K^[[B* > err.. we may have a encoding problem. but I'm quite sure it only is clearscreen, colors, and tputs stuff > > ^[[37m^[[47m=E7=A0=A0[[m^[[30m^[[47m^[[68X^[[74`=E7=A0=A0[[m^[[30m^[[4= 0m^[[1m > > ^[[36m^[[44m^[[K^[[B ^[[37m^[[47m=E7=A0=A0[[m^[[30m^[[47m Checkin= g DB > > 1/2^[[20X^[[74`=E7=A0=A0[[m^[[30m^[[40m^[[1m ^[[36m^[[44m^[[K^[[B > [..] > > Dec 14 13:26:48 camtrace13 kernel: Starting slim. > > Dec 14 13:26:48 camtrace13 kernel: Starting > > You'll need to rework this somehow so dialog's stdout isn't written to > /dev/console, though that may seem necessary if you want it coming up on > the VTY0 boot screen. It may involve decoupling this task from running > 'inline' as a boot script somehow, or else making sure that output is > redirected to a log or temporary file instead of directly into dialog. > mmmmkay. It's now fixed. OUT=3D`/sbin/conscontrol | /usr/bin/sed -n 's;^Configured: .*\(tty[^, ]*\).*$;/dev/\1;p'` (is it always /dev/ttyv0? in doubt, I'll trust conscontrol) [...] $DIALOG [...] >$OUT > > > dhclient and oss seem to dump their output in /var/log/messages, while > > apache, postgresql and slim dump their one in /var/log/console.log > > So... How can my rc.script write in both console and messages logs? > > And how can I get rid of that? > > dhclient's (running) output is normally logged to messages, whereas the > 'Starting' messages are output of the rc process as it launches things. > Indeed, my bad. > > And it's only those couple of lines to messages, the rest of them to > console.log is unsurprising and expected if they're written to stdout. > > HTH a bit, Ian Thanks! --=20 Samuel Mart=C3=ADn Moro {EPITECH.} tek5 CamTrace S.A.S (+033) 1 41 38 37 60 1 All=C3=A9e de la Venelle 92150 Suresnes FRANCE "Nobody wants to say how this works. Maybe nobody knows ..." Xorg.conf(5) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 15 14:46:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 703CB106567A for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:46:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fullblaststorm@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EADB8FC0A for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:46:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywp6 with SMTP id 6so1089913ywp.13 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 06:46:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=JTEYHCGYTxmcPuh/lgD3JketPmZJwzOf+vfYjFu0yic=; b=vI6wUjoIONPrauXUdo8GVNCjqmihExB9rKiqBAHwQ72zFboO+hgwtbLiYNk+ea/u/4 T/NPnbKnfblOSXhV/dUDpdz7Ar62iDs8eptVazlXia+xeTk/duWF5EneTt0AMIDcbA0b Lwv5qiYMYtMzBrahdZuYTmSHkohg17eQFwzuE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=wkHYYMIqd2yCNkCvTM/vgzgsItebrzL9VggyEUmNRou9lOLwf5QZceXNKcOJtq2hxI cfzdLTXeVqLe9PhQSHKKnUBTlp21J905c8hohdF6lMZh/mBFQg63+2zS2itKHARK5LFG 7wU2iSOnMbuXUqUnVvkObjGeghs8m7lVz1ZR8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.151.7.14 with SMTP id k14mr9874475ybi.365.1292423003214; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 06:23:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.195.72 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 06:23:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 20:23:23 +0600 Message-ID: From: Victor Lyapunov To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: FreeBSD IPSec stack contains backdoors? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 14:46:04 -0000 Hi folks, Recently OpenBSD developer Gregory Perry disclosed information about possible backdoors in OpenBSD IPSec stack (see http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.tech/22557) In particular, Gregory Perry, who has been working on a OpenBSD -ish implementation of IPSec says a number of backdoors have been introduced into the code. As far as I am aware, FreeBSD contains considerable amount of code ported from OpenBSD. The question is: was the FreeBSD's ipsec code ported from OpenBSD's implementation? If so, what might be the impact of this? Thanks, Victor Lyapunov. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 15 15:30:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ACA81065698 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:30:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AB328FC27 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:30:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBFFUHiE097835; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 08:30:17 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id oBFFUHYf097832; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 08:30:17 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 08:30:17 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Polytropon In-Reply-To: <20101215153103.ae1fb1ef.freebsd@edvax.de> Message-ID: References: <201012150800.oBF80FRf015357@mail.r-bonomi.com> <20101215153103.ae1fb1ef.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 15 Dec 2010 08:30:17 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Creating clone of a HDD including boot partition X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:30:21 -0000 On Wed, 15 Dec 2010, Polytropon wrote: > On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 02:00:15 -0600 (CST), Robert Bonomi wrote: >>> What would be your suggested method to achieve this goal. >> >> *IF* the disks are the same size/geometry, then simply dd(1) from one raw >> device to the other. Also works if the target disk is larger than the source. Of course some unused space will be left at the end of the target disk. > And if it's not, use the recommended standard transfer > method of dump + restore. Before you can do so, run a > script (e. g. from a live system CD) to perform the > slicing and partitioning according to your needs > (fdisk, disklabel/bsdlabel, newfs, tunefs, or geom > tools, or zfs tools). This method will (hopefully) recreate the MBR or GPT, but not copy it. Which is probably fine, but just mentioned in light of the Subject. "Backup Options For FreeBSD" is an article I wrote not too long ago comparing the use of dump/restore, dd, and Clonezilla: http://www.wonkity.com/~wblock/docs/html/backup.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 15 15:30:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F06DD1065672 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:30:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@todoo.biz) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [87.98.206.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 72A6B8FC12 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:30:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9581B78C36; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:11:46 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.6.4 (20090625) at rmm.fr Received: from newmail.rmm.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id hl6Ij2FQSQcT; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:11:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [87.98.206.99]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hidden) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3605F78C2E ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:11:46 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 From: bsd In-Reply-To: <201012150800.oBF80FRf015357@mail.r-bonomi.com> Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:11:45 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <58F35D2B-19D0-4FE0-A4DA-03FDA8128BD2@todoo.biz> References: <201012150800.oBF80FRf015357@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: Robert Bonomi X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Creating clone of a HDD including boot partition X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:30:46 -0000 Is there a way to dd to a file to create an iso image and then restore = (still using dd from this image).=20 I only have one IDE <--> USB cable so this is the reason why It'd more = simple for me to create an iso image of the disk and then restore.=20 Using dump won't be very useful because I won't be able to get the first = 63 segments where boot info are written, I need something of lower level = (obviously dd will be my friend).=20 Thanks everyone. I'll try to post the line code once I got It up and = running. =20 Thanks.=20 Le 15 d=E9c. 2010 =E0 09:00, Robert Bonomi a =E9crit : >=20 >> =46rom owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Dec 14 09:01:02 2010 >> From: nagios >> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 15:42:42 +0100 >> To: Liste FreeBSD >> Subject: Creating clone of a HDD including boot partition >>=20 >> Hello, >>=20 >> I have setup a tailored made configuration (1 UFS partition + 1 >> swap + boot sectors) for some hardware that I am reselling and >> would like to clone one existing HDD (tailor made) and be able to >> dump to another new HDD. >>=20 >> System is running pfSense with FreeBSD 7.2 and soon 8.x >>=20 >> What would be your suggested method to achieve this goal. >=20 > *IF* the disks are the same size/geometry, then simply dd(1) from one = raw > device to the other. >=20 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" =96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96= =96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96 ---------> Gr=E9gory Bernard Director <--------- ---------------> www.osnet.eu <--------------- --> Your provider of OpenSource appliances <-- =96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96= =96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96 OSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetO From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 15 15:46:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC45B106564A for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:46:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D2508FC15 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:46:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Status: No X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-2.9, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00, BAYES_00 -1.90) X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-ID: oBFFjsRS011050 Received: from gkeramidas-glaptop.linux.gr ([74.125.57.36]) (authenticated bits=0) by igloo.linux.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id oBFFjsRS011050 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:46:01 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: bsd References: <201012150800.oBF80FRf015357@mail.r-bonomi.com> <58F35D2B-19D0-4FE0-A4DA-03FDA8128BD2@todoo.biz> Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:45:54 +0100 In-Reply-To: <58F35D2B-19D0-4FE0-A4DA-03FDA8128BD2@todoo.biz> (bsd@todoo.biz's message of "Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:11:45 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Robert Bonomi Subject: Re: Creating clone of a HDD including boot partition X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:46:11 -0000 On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:11:45 +0100, bsd wrote: > Is there a way to dd to a file to create an iso image and then restore > (still using dd from this image). I only have one IDE <--> USB cable > so this is the reason why It'd more simple for me to create an iso > image of the disk and then restore. > > Using dump won't be very useful because I won't be able to get the > first 63 segments where boot info are written, I need something of > lower level (obviously dd will be my friend). > > Thanks everyone. I'll try to post the line code once I got It up and > running. No dd(1) cannot do that. What you _can_ do is boot into single-user mode, and then use mkisofs with burncd or growisofs from dvd+rw-tools to burn an image while still in single-user mode. The only user mode process is your root shell at that point, so you can be relatively sure there are no major changes happening somewhere at the filesystem while you are still dumping it to a CD-ROM or DVD-ROM disk. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 15 17:55:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2D61106566B for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:55:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@todoo.biz) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [87.98.206.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A38D98FC19 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:55:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE9CD78C19; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:55:44 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.6.4 (20090625) at rmm.fr Received: from newmail.rmm.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id TyN+CVYfaYqU; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:55:44 +0100 (CET) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [87.98.206.99]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hidden) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4FB3678C2C ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:55:44 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 From: bsd In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:55:42 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: Liste FreeBSD X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Cc: Victor Lyapunov Subject: Re: FreeBSD IPSec stack contains backdoors? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:55:46 -0000 This is not so clear !=20 = http://www.itworld.com/open-source/130820/openbsdfbi-allegations-denied-na= med-participant We should ask competent persons like Colin Percival=85 the FreeBSD = Security Officer since 2005.=20 He would have a point of view much more precise than anyone of us could = have.=20 ;-)=20 Le 15 d=E9c. 2010 =E0 15:23, Victor Lyapunov a =E9crit : > Hi folks, > Recently OpenBSD developer Gregory Perry disclosed information about > possible backdoors in OpenBSD IPSec stack (see > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.tech/22557) In particular, > Gregory Perry, who has been working on a OpenBSD -ish implementation > of IPSec says a number of backdoors have been introduced into the > code. >=20 > As far as I am aware, FreeBSD contains considerable amount of code > ported from OpenBSD. The question is: was the FreeBSD's ipsec code > ported from OpenBSD's implementation? If so, what might be the impact > of this? >=20 > Thanks, > Victor Lyapunov. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" =96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96= =96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96 ---------> Gr=E9gory Bernard Director <--------- ---------------> www.osnet.eu <--------------- --> Your provider of OpenSource appliances <-- =96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96= =96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96 OSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetO From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 15 17:57:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E2C91065673 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:57:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@todoo.biz) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [87.98.206.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F20548FC1A for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:57:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F8F878C2C; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:57:34 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.6.4 (20090625) at rmm.fr Received: from newmail.rmm.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id gF7TGsDHnK02; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:57:34 +0100 (CET) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [87.98.206.99]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hidden) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E393278C21 ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:57:33 +0100 (CET) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 From: bsd In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:57:33 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <391E3F03-4064-40FB-850E-C852C10D789A@todoo.biz> References: <201012150800.oBF80FRf015357@mail.r-bonomi.com> <58F35D2B-19D0-4FE0-A4DA-03FDA8128BD2@todoo.biz> To: Giorgos Keramidas X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Cc: Liste FreeBSD Subject: Re: Creating clone of a HDD including boot partition X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:57:35 -0000 Just to be precise, I am not trying to do an ISO image of a running root = FS, but of a USB attached disk. =20 =85=20 Le 15 d=E9c. 2010 =E0 16:45, Giorgos Keramidas a =E9crit : > On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:11:45 +0100, bsd wrote: >> Is there a way to dd to a file to create an iso image and then = restore >> (still using dd from this image). I only have one IDE <--> USB cable >> so this is the reason why It'd more simple for me to create an iso >> image of the disk and then restore. >>=20 >> Using dump won't be very useful because I won't be able to get the >> first 63 segments where boot info are written, I need something of >> lower level (obviously dd will be my friend). >>=20 >> Thanks everyone. I'll try to post the line code once I got It up and >> running. >=20 > No dd(1) cannot do that. >=20 > What you _can_ do is boot into single-user mode, and then use mkisofs > with burncd or growisofs from dvd+rw-tools to burn an image while = still > in single-user mode. The only user mode process is your root shell at > that point, so you can be relatively sure there are no major changes > happening somewhere at the filesystem while you are still dumping it = to > a CD-ROM or DVD-ROM disk. >=20 >=20 =96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96= =96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96 ---------> Gr=E9gory Bernard Director <--------- ---------------> www.osnet.eu <--------------- --> Your provider of OpenSource appliances <-- =96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96= =96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96 OSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetO From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 15 17:59:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D99910656BA for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:59:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@coosemans.org) Received: from mailrelay002.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay002.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D35508FC13 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:59:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEAAmQCE1bscnD/2dsb2JhbACkKnTDOYVKBJYi Received: from 195.201-177-91.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([91.177.201.195]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 15 Dec 2010 18:59:01 +0100 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBFHx0un004694; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:59:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tijl@coosemans.org) From: Tijl Coosemans To: Anton Shterenlikht Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:58:50 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-PRERELEASE; KDE/4.5.2; i386; ; ) References: <20101129130415.GA47982@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <201012061406.31522.tijl@coosemans.org> <20101206151630.GB55368@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: <20101206151630.GB55368@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1680145.AXZLOnqFAl"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201012151858.58520.tijl@coosemans.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: binutils problem? WAS [Re: static linking error: ELF binary type "0" not known. Exec format error. Binary file not executable.] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 17:59:04 -0000 --nextPart1680145.AXZLOnqFAl Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Monday 06 December 2010 16:16:30 Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 02:06:22PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> On Monday 29 November 2010 14:04:16 Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >>> ----- Forwarded message from Marcel Moolenaar ----- >>>> On Nov 10, 2010, at 5:32 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >>>>> [ia64] >>>>> ia64% file a.out=20 >>>>> a.out: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, IA-64, version 1 (SYSV), statically >>>>> linked, not stripped >>>>>=20 >>>>> [amd64] >>>>> amd64% file a.out=20 >>>>> a.out: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (FreeBSD), >>>>> statically linked, for FreeBSD 9.0 (900023), not stripped >>>>=20 >>>> The branding on ia64 is wrong. The executable is not marked as being >>>> a FreeBSD executable. It's declared as SYSV, whereas on amd64 it's >>>> properly declared as FreeBSD. >>>>=20 >>>> This is a binutils problem. >>> >>> Anybody here can explain better what Marcel meant >>> by "binutils problem", and how to fix it? >>>=20 >>> I've binutils-2.20.1_3 installed from devel/binutils. >>=20 >> As a workaround you could manually brand the executable: >> brandelf -f 9 a.out >=20 > this works fine. A fix has been committed to CURRENT, 8-STABLE and 7-STABLE. You should no longer have to brand executables manually. --nextPart1680145.AXZLOnqFAl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iF4EABEIAAYFAk0JAeIACgkQfoCS2CCgtiuFDwD/VaDCiRJI5PGhqOtn57l7y6E4 QGDrtYaSxrRv6T6hDXUA/Aub+tx9GEmfjAcshlsuEOBcQuSuvVGLF+nsC0I74uSp =C7kg -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1680145.AXZLOnqFAl-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 15 19:20:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15C88106567A for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 19:20:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCEB78FC0A for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 19:20:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBFJK530098506; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:20:05 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id oBFJK5K3098503; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:20:05 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:20:05 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: bsd In-Reply-To: <58F35D2B-19D0-4FE0-A4DA-03FDA8128BD2@todoo.biz> Message-ID: References: <201012150800.oBF80FRf015357@mail.r-bonomi.com> <58F35D2B-19D0-4FE0-A4DA-03FDA8128BD2@todoo.biz> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:20:05 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Robert Bonomi Subject: Re: Creating clone of a HDD including boot partition X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 19:20:07 -0000 On Wed, 15 Dec 2010, bsd wrote: > Is there a way to dd to a file to create an iso image and then restore (still using dd from this image). > I only have one IDE <--> USB cable so this is the reason why It'd more simple for me to create an iso image of the disk and then restore. Use dd's of= parameter to send output to a file. If it really has to be an ISO, pipe it to mkisofs. Using dd like that makes big files with lots of wasted space. The article I posted earlier shows how to save some of that by filling the disk's empty space with zeros. Then gzip can do some useful compression. > Using dump won't be very useful because I won't be able to get the first 63 segments where boot info are written, I need something of lower level (obviously dd will be my friend). A hybrid approach would be to save the first 63 blocks with dd, then use dump for the UFS filesystems. dd if=/dev/ad0 of=mbr.bin count=63 PS: top-posting bad, inline with trimmed irrelevancies good. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 15 20:46:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45EFD106566B for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 20:46:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from blue.qeng-ho.org (blue.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C44A18FC14 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 20:46:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBFKkRWs084935 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 20:46:27 GMT (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Message-ID: <4D092923.8070709@qeng-ho.org> Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 20:46:27 +0000 From: Arthur Chance User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.16) Gecko/20101211 Thunderbird/3.0.11 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD-Questions References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: FreeBSD IPSec stack contains backdoors? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 20:46:29 -0000 [Top posting edited out, with heavy elisions] On 12/15/10 17:55, bsd wrote: > Le 15 déc. 2010 à 15:23, Victor Lyapunov a écrit : >> Recently OpenBSD developer Gregory Perry disclosed information about >> possible backdoors in OpenBSD IPSec stack >> >> As far as I am aware, FreeBSD contains considerable amount of code >> ported from OpenBSD. The question is: was the FreeBSD's ipsec code >> ported from OpenBSD's implementation? If so, what might be the impact >> of this? > This is not so clear ! > > http://www.itworld.com/open-source/130820/openbsdfbi-allegations-denied-named-participant Possibly a little more information: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/12/15/openbsd_backdoor_claim/ > We should ask competent persons like Colin Percival… the FreeBSD Security Officer since 2005. > He would have a point of view much more precise than anyone of us could have. I have no doubt he's looking at it, but waiting until he knows something before making an announcement. Let him take as much time as he needs. Auditing the code seems a good idea, panicking about it a bad one. How many people actually use IPSec anyway? The one time I was forced to use it, it seemed like a hideous, designed by committee nightmare. (Having to set up incoming and outgoing crypto independently, who thought that was a good idea?) I'd always use something like OpenVPN by preference. -- "Although the wombat is real and the dragon is not, few know what a wombat looks like, but everyone knows what a dragon looks like." -- Avram Davidson, _Adventures in Unhistory_ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 15 20:59:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B0E41065670 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 20:59:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from outbackdingo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ey0-f178.google.com (mail-ey0-f178.google.com [209.85.215.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873338FC12 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 20:59:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyh5 with SMTP id 5so1357432eyh.37 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:59:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=x66O43Fh1/7LXbxoqpv/saOcgQRjlksWjsdJuGtagGk=; b=E9d+WbWD+XF7TYTrOQUCFqy+2etcim/L3eHl3h3MaeqKvf9uk4UCr2FNwgX8Gqa1BS mTxNZwnUVbEKZi1ZYkpBWGX9E00Y8eWyb/4xQdRmq2MvB+MUBHlvg8yOBl10UpaW1jjd hnWUpG6BgzrYNmTpZtUzttVsmGiTPYbKkTFzs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=Xzp6t7eZNH2/rhy4wgcxd+k5BKlxNAqfBXiVieTfD5aLd5lhGs4TiydRuW9qS9uOqq wp1jc2AL5JI2vUlzcb9qOjfg0tdyRwdj1fsIH9qjWf32YTOW+eSkWRGgKrPT2gjbEulg OXHTE4evexOqZ4MVmGzqjjDkg7DRR+rcbsw3w= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.29.10 with SMTP id h10mr1689237eea.10.1292445024336; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:30:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.48.75 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 12:30:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:30:24 -0500 Message-ID: From: Outback Dingo To: bsd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Liste FreeBSD , Victor Lyapunov Subject: Re: FreeBSD IPSec stack contains backdoors? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 20:59:15 -0000 Even if it is FUD, seeing as there is smoke, a complete audit of said code, and subsystems must be completed for assurance On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:55 PM, bsd wrote: > This is not so clear ! > > > http://www.itworld.com/open-source/130820/openbsdfbi-allegations-denied-n= amed-participant > > We should ask competent persons like Colin Percival=85 the FreeBSD Securi= ty > Officer since 2005. > He would have a point of view much more precise than anyone of us could > have. > > ;-) > > > Le 15 d=E9c. 2010 =E0 15:23, Victor Lyapunov a =E9crit : > > > Hi folks, > > Recently OpenBSD developer Gregory Perry disclosed information about > > possible backdoors in OpenBSD IPSec stack (see > > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.tech/22557) In particular, > > Gregory Perry, who has been working on a OpenBSD -ish implementation > > of IPSec says a number of backdoors have been introduced into the > > code. > > > > As far as I am aware, FreeBSD contains considerable amount of code > > ported from OpenBSD. The question is: was the FreeBSD's ipsec code > > ported from OpenBSD's implementation? If so, what might be the impact > > of this? > > > > Thanks, > > Victor Lyapunov. > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > =96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96= =96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96 > ---------> Gr=E9gory Bernard Director <--------- > ---------------> www.osnet.eu <--------------- > --> Your provider of OpenSource appliances <-- > =96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96= =96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96 > OSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetO > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 15 23:32:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F2CE1065670 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 23:32:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@g8kbv.demon.co.uk) Received: from anchor-post-3.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-3.mail.demon.net [195.173.77.134]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05CA98FC1A for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 23:32:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.225.127.64] (helo=[192.168.33.1]) by anchor-post-3.mail.demon.net with esmtpa (AUTH g8kbv) (Exim 4.69) id 1PT0pY-0001ol-ng for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 23:32:20 +0000 From: "Dave" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 23:32:20 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <4D095004.5513.2EF1E210@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <20101215120036.DFC371065849@hub.freebsd.org> References: <20101215120036.DFC371065849@hub.freebsd.org> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.52) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body Subject: Noob Jail question. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 23:32:24 -0000 Hi. As some of you may remember, I've managed to build a F'BSD V8.0 based system that provides me with:- Local GPS disiplined NTP server (working very well) the reason I built the thing in the first place, but it seems FreeBSD can do so much more, so I also have..... Hiawatha webserver (also working well) FTPD for updating the web pages Hiawatha serves up (working well) Other systems here generate data, that is FTP'd over the LAN to the web page folders. SSH remote login for admin needs (But not for "root" login) Also working well. All this will start happily, boot and sort itself out as a "headless" machine, and if needed collapse gracefully and shutdown cleanly, with one press of the power button. I am impressed! I've been reading the FreeBSD Manual (a dangerous thing to do during lunchtimes!) relating to Jails. Other than making my head spin, I'm finding it a tad dificult finding out just what you can/cant do with a Jail. Mainly, because I'm not familiar with a lot of the terms used, and though the man pages are no doubt correct as a reference, they don't "explain" it well, in as much as how to use it, well in my addled mind at the moment. I think I'd like to run Hiawatha in a Jail, as it seems "the right thing to do" with something that will be exposed to the www. (Comments/advice?) But, how do I arrange it to safely get (read only) access to the website data, without preventing the FTPD service from having access to update that data. FTPD will only be reachable from LAN side of the main gateway router, Hiawatha will have an outside world port forwarded to it by the router. What I'm asking I guess, is.. Can a jail'd app, reach outside the jail in "read only" mode. (I suspect, maybe?) Or can an app outside the jail, drop stuff off inside the jail? (For whatever reason, I suspect not?) If anyone understands what the heck I'm blathering on about, please explain it to me, as I think I've lost the plot. Comments, advice, brickbats etc? Best Regards. Dave B. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 15 23:56:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C641C106564A for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 23:56:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexer@internode.on.net) Received: from mail.internode.on.net (bld-mail14.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 176F58FC14 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 23:56:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from staff-251-101.wireless.adelaide.edu.au (unverified [129.127.251.101]) by mail.internode.on.net (SurgeMail 3.8f2) with ESMTP id 50501523-1927428 for multiple; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:26:43 +1030 (CDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Indexer In-Reply-To: <4D095004.5513.2EF1E210@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:26:35 +1030 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <0F9350BD-7156-474A-A7C0-5BBFF79E8EDF@internode.on.net> References: <20101215120036.DFC371065849@hub.freebsd.org> <4D095004.5513.2EF1E210@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> To: Dave X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.3.1 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Noob Jail question. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 23:56:45 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >=20 >=20 > SSH remote login for admin needs (But not for "root" login) Also = working=20 > well. Good! > I think I'd like to run Hiawatha in a Jail, as it seems "the right = thing=20 > to do" with something that will be exposed to the www. =20 > (Comments/advice?) - =46rom a security standpoint it makes sense, as it confines a malicous = user *if* they get in. >=20 > But, how do I arrange it to safely get (read only) access to the = website=20 > data, without preventing the FTPD service from having access to update=20= > that data. FTPD will only be reachable from LAN side of the main = gateway=20 > router, Hiawatha will have an outside world port forwarded to it by = the=20 > router. You notice the way jails work? they are essentially a fenced off part of = your filesystem. So your jail may live in /usr/jails on the host system. = You can access all the contents of the jail from the host of course. An easy answer to this would be something like, have a directory called = /var/www and have the FTPD write to that. Then mount /var/www as a = nullfs in read only mode to /usr/jails/var/www, and point your webserver = (which inside the jail is unaware of some of this) to /var/www (or to = the host, the /usr/jails/var/www) >=20 > What I'm asking I guess, is.. Can a jail'd app, reach outside the = jail=20 > in "read only" mode. (I suspect, maybe?) Or can an app outside the=20= > jail, drop stuff off inside the jail? (For whatever reason, I suspect=20= > not?) A jailed app cannot reach "outside" , this defeat the purpose. On the = other hand the host can "reach in" The best way to learn is to try, so setting it up on a dev machine is = probably the best way to go. Again, if you need more help, email this = list. Sincerely William Brown pgp.mit.edu -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJNCVW3AAoJEHF16AnLoz6JXo4P/Rg0+pdhxP8tiKeqSGi6n9dy hYj4KsnnG1diggB/+VI7tnffJqhm9HTqds9f+VXqx/YkTXNZirTBSbQtqAPz41Z6 FwAr1bAw5aUVQf8Pc80xsk9UMeI9L1wM7/rjRYRab1h6g8SBv2Gf/AZ4oLC3rO4C PQwigplntB/MIYMBrAsizpBar7f+sPPpftxlYAIl3s3prysja1KTOW4l+NDOPO4U OUQ2o5x4Gpbt/suhlrx/jjWhSRqyhwblN8DEXkwuIyR6HT9PuUOH05YDB1bg4nSs OW8N5ZD6VoTkcDP1kayBoD5kEcRQX4eji9LksTnsJoxXb4bers1JyT2wsAYZr5LC W45UEtvaHjidsP4mpnnaWMeHL7U89YEaUub8PtR3NYs2ky2A3stw2qKDemvQuP1q QntJVeq8VETig139aKjBcEs04NW/8MkEajKigkDFmUEoHpFfxAsIsIUZO6P0QElQ whcFTDLiq9IG+J+eeq3/YcykCWLJju1cnL0Nzah91L5GHTi866cR2vafP8aJN1/5 D2EQEoghbstIjgTtTBC5Y+csBDffzAS6MfjsJ0S8TC8fYBRSF5sAqQXAc3x/pNZ6 lw8GNgkAmLrrKMmRpbmnHJbGOs22udzfuqtEKMs+dme+L0xNeCuZSJGbxC2+CXtD qayfvD4Kqj8yK+vYMBAt =3D8A/f -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 16 02:45:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11409106564A for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 02:45:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@insightbb.com) Received: from mxsf00.insightbb.com (mxsf00.insightbb.com [74.128.0.70]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D36D88FC0A for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 02:45:22 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,352,1288584000"; d="scan'208";a="978768580" Received: from unknown (HELO asav00.insightbb.com) ([172.31.249.123]) by mxsf00.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 15 Dec 2010 21:45:21 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ap87AHMMCU1KgCiCPGdsb2JhbACIMY1Vji0MAQEBATUvwU2FSgSEZA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,352,1288584000"; d="scan'208";a="82498181" Received: from 74-128-40-130.dhcp.insightbb.com (HELO laptop2.stevenfriedrich.org) ([74.128.40.130]) by asavout00.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 15 Dec 2010 21:45:21 -0500 From: Steven Friedrich To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 21:45:10 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.1-RELEASE-p2; KDE/4.5.4; i386; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201012152145.11560.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> Subject: KMix v3.7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 02:45:23 -0000 Why can't I change the Mute setting? I click it, nothing happens. Can't change the capture setting either. -- System Name: laptop2.StevenFriedrich.org Hardware: 2.80GHz Intel Pentium 4 (HTT) with 2 GB memory OS version: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p2 i386 (5.1 MB kernel) Window Manager(s): kde4-4.5.4 X Window System: xorg-7.5 X.Org X Server 1.7.5 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 16 02:47:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77678106566C for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 02:47:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@insightbb.com) Received: from mxsf02.insightbb.com (mxsf02.insightbb.com [74.128.0.63]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 461168FC1C for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 02:47:46 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,352,1288584000"; d="scan'208";a="927500519" Received: from unknown (HELO asav00.insightbb.com) ([172.31.249.123]) by mxsf02.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 15 Dec 2010 21:47:46 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Ask+AHMMCU1KgCiCPGdsb2JhbACEW4NWjVMBAY4tDAEBAQE1L8FNhUoEhGQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,352,1288584000"; d="scan'208";a="82498653" Received: from 74-128-40-130.dhcp.insightbb.com (HELO laptop2.stevenfriedrich.org) ([74.128.40.130]) by asavout00.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 15 Dec 2010 21:47:45 -0500 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Steven Friedrich Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 21:47:45 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201012152147.45711.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> Subject: KMix v3.7 Added sound driver info X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 02:47:47 -0000 Why can't I change the Mute setting? I click it, nothing happens. Can't change the capture setting either. -- System Name: laptop2.StevenFriedrich.org Hardware: 2.80GHz Intel Pentium 4 (HTT) with 2 GB memory OS version: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p2 i386 (5.1 MB kernel) Window Manager(s): kde4-4.5.4 X Window System: xorg-7.5 X.Org X Server 1.7.5 FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm: 32bit 2009061500/i386) Installed devices: pcm0: (play/rec) default From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 16 02:47:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD3E11065670 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 02:47:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3FDE8FC1B for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 02:47:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id oBG2liWn082766; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 13:47:44 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 13:47:44 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Samuel_Mart=EDn_Moro?= In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20101216125341.P83735@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20101214180343.F008310656F6@hub.freebsd.org> <20101215140116.M83735@sola.nimnet.asn.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="0-189344276-1292465235=:83735" Content-ID: <20101216130741.G83735@sola.nimnet.asn.au> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: boot, rc script and logs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 02:47:47 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --0-189344276-1292465235=:83735 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Content-ID: <20101216130741.B83735@sola.nimnet.asn.au> On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 15:42:29 +0100, Samuel Martín Moro wrote: > On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 4:57 AM, Ian Smith wrote: [..] > > > Dec 14 13:26:47 camtrace13 kernel: ^[[m > > > Dec 14 13:26:47 camtrace13 kernel: ^[[39;49m^[[=1S > > > Dec 14 13:26:47 camtrace13 kernel: > > > > > ^[[39;49m^[[m^[[H^[[J^[[17d^[[36m^[[44m^[[1m^[[J^[[H^[[K^[[B^[[K^[[B^[[K^[[B^[[K^[[B^[[K^[[B^[[K^[[B^[[K^[[B^[[K^[[B > > * > ^[[37m^[[**47mÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ** > > ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ[[m^[[30m^[[47mÿÿ[[m^[[**36m^[[44m^[[1m^[[K^[[B* > > > err.. we may have a encoding problem. Indeed. I originally quoted yours from a digest, which are text-only, US-ASCII. Your reply has your name in ISO-8859-1, but both text and HTML parts in UTF-8. I expect this reply (with your i-acute correct) will be text-only, ISO-8859-1. pine does its best, but gmail confuses it; I don't know if not also sending HTML parts to the list may help, as mailman drops non-plaintext attachments, including HTML, anyway. > but I'm quite sure it only is clearscreen, colors, and tputs stuff > > > > ^[[37m^[[47mÿÿ[[m^[[30m^[[47m^[[68X^[[74`ÿÿ[[m^[[30m^[[40m^[[1m > > > ^[[36m^[[44m^[[K^[[B ^[[37m^[[47mÿÿ[[m^[[30m^[[47m Checking DB > > > 1/2^[[20X^[[74`ÿÿ[[m^[[30m^[[40m^[[1m ^[[36m^[[44m^[[K^[[B > > [..] > > > Dec 14 13:26:48 camtrace13 kernel: Starting slim. > > > Dec 14 13:26:48 camtrace13 kernel: Starting > > > > > You'll need to rework this somehow so dialog's stdout isn't written to > > /dev/console, though that may seem necessary if you want it coming up on > > the VTY0 boot screen. It may involve decoupling this task from running > > 'inline' as a boot script somehow, or else making sure that output is > > redirected to a log or temporary file instead of directly into dialog. > > > mmmmkay. > It's now fixed. > OUT=`/sbin/conscontrol | /usr/bin/sed -n 's;^Configured: .*\(tty[^,]*\).*$;/dev/\1;p'` > (is it always /dev/ttyv0? in doubt, I'll trust conscontrol) > [...] $DIALOG [...] >$OUT Ah, bien. Yes I think it'll always be ttyv0 at that time, but that's an elegant solution. Thanks, we've both learned something! cheers, Ian --0-189344276-1292465235=:83735-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 16 02:57:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91DBF106566C for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 02:57:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.e.sanliturk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51AD78FC12 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 02:57:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn39 with SMTP id 39so2824980iwn.13 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:57:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=K1CyeiSeGzprjkzHIOFALf5TFgyaEqZxmdq6q1rmQQE=; b=Y0lxKg0snHMyMbIC+UFBn0mt8vUckyivJ91mVlZCxMnMzZyIIsskAcQfn6ttLhPpuW HKPUjqJgXdFKVZiEBWPPXn8XCQTslHAEcKNBeqMfPv3yX36vLPV3jCMOKn25HIi0SfNc 7wlv4jN0Ku62uyRX1lHOk0PWAq1vFrVFhMJCU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=sHz7i/k/e4gtsNgQTrcUiFQIA1RmDEs4L/t6kQtG35cdasmI4Z/3MkmNYGQ9E1hSxX U+Y7l7N8WIsprpcxNu7Bxc2nl3T/Oec6zHA8Ohafc1OJkKLGOMQrDnEmDJaHVbhfQZ7o wpjhbNP1B0KqUsRcgi9kEEuiVDHMA2yyl9fFY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.36.198 with SMTP id u6mr5662458ibd.100.1292466824335; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:33:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.79.197 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:33:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <391E3F03-4064-40FB-850E-C852C10D789A@todoo.biz> References: <201012150800.oBF80FRf015357@mail.r-bonomi.com> <58F35D2B-19D0-4FE0-A4DA-03FDA8128BD2@todoo.biz> <391E3F03-4064-40FB-850E-C852C10D789A@todoo.biz> Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 21:33:44 -0500 Message-ID: From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk To: bsd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Giorgos Keramidas , Liste FreeBSD Subject: Re: Creating clone of a HDD including boot partition X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 02:57:34 -0000 On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 12:57 PM, bsd wrote: Just to be precise, I am not trying to do an ISO image of a running root FS= , > but of a USB attached disk. > > =E2=80=A6 > > I did not apply the following steps for FreeBSD , but I have applied them i= n Mandriva Linux a few times : Assume that the operating system is broken and it is not possible to repair it , and the data files are not destroyed ( in Mandriva Linux , /home/ is in a different partition ) . I am removing power line of broken OS hard disk ( to prevent accidental overwrite ) . I am attaching a new hard disk . I am installing the Mandriva Linux from scratch onto the new hard disk . I am attaching the power line of previous hard disk . I am mounting required partition(s) of the previous hard disk . I am using copy from previous hard disk with recursive parameter on required directories . After making a complete copy and verifying that everything is copied properly , I am re-using the previous hard disk for another task ( mostly it remains o= n the same computer for a possible new recovery ) . In that way , it is not necessary to use same size hard disks . Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 16 04:53:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFDA9106564A for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 04:53:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 350788FC13 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 04:53:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.193]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBD525C44 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:58:22 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4D099A80.6030808@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:50:08 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101119 Thunderbird/3.0.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101215120036.DFC371065849@hub.freebsd.org> <4D095004.5513.2EF1E210@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4D095004.5513.2EF1E210@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Noob Jail question. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 04:53:33 -0000 On 12/16/10 09:32, Dave wrote: > Hi. > > As some of you may remember, I've managed to build a F'BSD V8.0 based > system that provides me with:- > > Local GPS disiplined NTP server (working very well) the reason I built > the thing in the first place, but it seems FreeBSD can do so much more, > so I also have..... > > Hiawatha webserver (also working well) > > FTPD for updating the web pages Hiawatha serves up (working well) Other > systems here generate data, that is FTP'd over the LAN to the web page > folders. > > SSH remote login for admin needs (But not for "root" login) Also working > well. > > All this will start happily, boot and sort itself out as a "headless" > machine, and if needed collapse gracefully and shutdown cleanly, with one > press of the power button. I am impressed! > > I've been reading the FreeBSD Manual (a dangerous thing to do during > lunchtimes!) relating to Jails. Other than making my head spin, I'm > finding it a tad dificult finding out just what you can/cant do with a > Jail. Mainly, because I'm not familiar with a lot of the terms used, and > though the man pages are no doubt correct as a reference, they don't > "explain" it well, in as much as how to use it, well in my addled mind at > the moment. > > I think I'd like to run Hiawatha in a Jail, as it seems "the right thing > to do" with something that will be exposed to the www. > (Comments/advice?) > > But, how do I arrange it to safely get (read only) access to the website > data, without preventing the FTPD service from having access to update > that data. FTPD will only be reachable from LAN side of the main gateway > router, Hiawatha will have an outside world port forwarded to it by the > router. > > What I'm asking I guess, is.. Can a jail'd app, reach outside the jail > in "read only" mode. (I suspect, maybe?) Or can an app outside the > jail, drop stuff off inside the jail? (For whatever reason, I suspect > not?) > > If anyone understands what the heck I'm blathering on about, please > explain it to me, as I think I've lost the plot. > > Comments, advice, brickbats etc? > > Best Regards. > > Dave B. > Sounds good. A jail is essentially paravirtualisation, in other words it partitions your OS into distinct segments. Linux has just started making inroads on this with vserver and such. The kernel stays the same, but you actually have separately distinct kernel code, security, etc for each jail. So it make sense then to run just one service within it, but its possible to run an entire system- with multiple systems on one host. This method is extremely fast, barely any trade off compared to running say VirtualBox, VMWare, or Qemu. As you read, you hand off a branch in your file system to hold the data for the jail (kernel, world, and apps and associated data etc), and the jail system inside the jail can only see that branch. Thats its equivalent of / on the host. It can't see outside of that unless you place something inside that banch from the host. You even have to actually mount a separate devfs inside the jail if required. So you want FTPD to drop files into the webserver, and the webserver is in a jail; then (consider the security of what your attempting) either FTPD has to access the branch containing the jail and webroot, or mount using nullfs the branch containing FTPD directory inside the jail. HTH and good luck. For bonus points you can even try a service only jail, where you don't need the whole system in the jail, just the libraries needed by the service app :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 16 06:49:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47249106566C for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 06:49:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@penx.com) Received: from Elmer.dco.penx.com (elmer.dco.penx.com [174.46.214.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 043558FC16 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 06:49:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by Elmer.dco.penx.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBG6nfmv089074 for ; Wed, 15 Dec 2010 23:49:41 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from freebsd@penx.com) Date: Wed, 15 Dec 2010 23:49:41 -0700 (MST) From: Dennis Glatting X-X-Sender: dennisg@Elmer.dco.penx.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Subject: /usr/include/machine/endian.h:123: syntax error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 06:49:55 -0000 While compiling a port... btw> uname -a FreeBSD btw 8.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-PRERELEASE #55: Sat Dec 11 22:48:59 PST 2010 root@btw:/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/BTW amd64 btw# portupgrade devel/libgdata GISCAN gdata/GData-0.0.gir /usr/include/machine/endian.h:123: syntax error, unexpected '{' in ' return (__extension__ ({ register __uint64_t __X = (_x); __asm ("bswap %0" : "+r" (__X)); __X; }));' at '{' From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 16 10:34:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F7EB106566C for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:34:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from s.dave.jones@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iw0-f182.google.com (mail-iw0-f182.google.com [209.85.214.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B9568FC16 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:34:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn39 with SMTP id 39so3155317iwn.13 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 02:34:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=J/NJgAG1z1Pe1iDtKCvd+h90Wjpb0h62m8DaUb1Amgo=; b=oZnsflYeFTduoUdykvZTmHJi9pP5JQkdVZjji14p6HoZpeMPaoLm7TX3O8ZmLge7g+ Uj1Nf6lnHYpDBaEsnEQZl6rvHhuysZxi965qHN3liGKcDeysEPtEpBAY9Lk0j/orXDLK D3OVevTBa2r0s9ptGp81v3UsGtv+KNOfZcJA8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=vJFe584LPOQfmACyq4bmv1bbGyIxw6QdqH8L1CcXe7PUBJ+xF4znM31J7A9UDYKDqB wiPhccbJPnWF9EOPTHDxrSDOPYPFoj2BrCGfwHnXS9eEqyup+Cg6ZZzRNrGZZ2+gBXoO Tsadzzs5sQstYX4fwscI/mmxsBxtjzCrpmHZk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.33.198 with SMTP id i6mr6052769ibd.10.1292493763522; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 02:02:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.188.18 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 02:02:43 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:02:43 +0800 Message-ID: From: dave jones To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Question about multicast forwarding X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:34:09 -0000 Hi, I have the following networks: ----------------------------------------------- | | | | iptv device (172.16.113.2) FreeBSD (re0:172.16.113.8) | (re1:172.16.112.2) | PCs The iptv device which sends to multicast 224.0.3.2, I want my PCs to receive multicast packets and let clients watch TV. Should I use net/mrouted or use pf can do that? Would anyone tell me how to do? Thanks. Cheers, Dave. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 16 10:54:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FB5E106564A for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:54:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvass9573@gmx.com) Received: from mailout-eu.gmx.com (mailout-eu.gmx.com [213.165.64.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E0D2A8FC14 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:54:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 16 Dec 2010 10:54:40 -0000 Received: from adsl-131.109.242.152.tellas.gr (EHLO [192.168.73.197]) [109.242.152.131] by mail.gmx.com (mp-eu001) with SMTP; 16 Dec 2010 11:54:40 +0100 X-Authenticated: #46156728 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19vl2R/jwxvk9JH1KGMDy1OYKep3hh2eNsZw2iA1y 5yYImZemqkWbuZ Message-ID: <4D09EFD9.504@gmx.com> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:54:17 +0200 From: Nikos Vassiliadis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: matt@webcontracts.co.uk References: <0ec066ac2fd5161d5f3715c6a0c776d6.squirrel@www.webcontracts.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <0ec066ac2fd5161d5f3715c6a0c776d6.squirrel@www.webcontracts.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FTP server link aggregation X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:54:43 -0000 On 12/15/2010 3:11 PM, Matthew Law wrote: > I have a single FreeBSD box acting as an FTP server for multiple FreeBSD > and Linux clients on the same /24 subnet (all gigabit ethernet). It is > currently connected by just one of it's two gig ethernet ports. I also > have two cisco switches with an etherchannel between them (using 2 x gig > ports on each switch). I would like to connect the remaining NIC on my > FreeBSD box to the other switch and enable 802.3ad on those switch ports > to aggregate traffic between them. > > This is in the hope that it can better serve multiple FTP clients. Is my > thinking correct? Other than the network interface changes which are > documented here: > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-aggregation.html are there any > further tweaks I could make to improve things? -the server is a 'standard > install' and does not use ZFS. It has an adaptec 5408 RAID card with 4 x > SATA II drives and, IIRC, 128K stripe size and plenty of RAM. > > Is there a way of testing this other than initiating large file transfers > to this server from multiple hosts? > A simple ping from multiple sources to your server will do. LACP will associate each SRCMAC and DSTMAC pair to one physical interface. Creating traffic with many different SRCMAC and DSTMAC pairs will use both physical interfaces. But, I do vaguely remember that if_lagg was not able to perform at 2 * 1Gbps level. Use "systat -ifstat" to check what's happening and please, post your performance findings to the list! HTH, Nikos From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 16 10:55:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EED1106564A for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:55:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@todoo.biz) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [87.98.206.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D46468FC23 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:55:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06FE078C51 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:55:19 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.6.4 (20090625) at rmm.fr Received: from newmail.rmm.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id knMMGdOqNiXr for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:55:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [87.98.206.99]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hidden) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A06BA78C42 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:55:18 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) From: bsd In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:55:17 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <201012150800.oBF80FRf015357@mail.r-bonomi.com> <58F35D2B-19D0-4FE0-A4DA-03FDA8128BD2@todoo.biz> To: Liste FreeBSD X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Subject: Re: Creating clone of a HDD including boot partition X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:55:20 -0000 Le 15 d=E9c. 2010 =E0 20:20, Warren Block a =E9crit : > On Wed, 15 Dec 2010, bsd wrote: >=20 >> Is there a way to dd to a file to create an iso image and then = restore (still using dd from this image). >> I only have one IDE <--> USB cable so this is the reason why It'd = more simple for me to create an iso image of the disk and then restore. >=20 > Use dd's of=3D parameter to send output to a file. If it really has = to be an ISO, pipe it to mkisofs. Using dd like that makes big files = with lots of wasted space. The article I posted earlier shows how to = save some of that by filling the disk's empty space with zeros. Then = gzip can do some useful compression. >=20 >> Using dump won't be very useful because I won't be able to get the = first 63 segments where boot info are written, I need something of lower = level (obviously dd will be my friend). >=20 > A hybrid approach would be to save the first 63 blocks with dd, then = use dump for the UFS filesystems. >=20 > dd if=3D/dev/ad0 of=3Dmbr.bin count=3D63 >=20 > PS: top-posting bad, inline with trimmed irrelevancies good. Ok,=20 Thanks for the link and explanation.=20 I have tried to use the compressed approach using smthg like: # mount /dev/ad0s1a /mnt # cd /mnt # dd if=3D/dev/zero of=3Dzerofile bs=3D1M I have a lot of errors on standerr output such as :=20 g_vfs_done() : da0s1a [WRITE(offset=3D58978680256, length=3D131072)]error = =3D 5 Up to a point where It has finaly freezed my running FBSD 8.1.=20 I don't think I have reached the end of the file=85 ??=20 --=20 I am restarting the operation.=20 =96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96= =96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96 ---------> Gr=E9gory Bernard Director <--------- ---------------> www.osnet.eu <--------------- --> Your provider of OpenSource appliances <-- =96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96= =96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96 OSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetO From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 16 11:02:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FBEE106566B for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:02:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7C808FC13 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:02:00 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Status: No X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-2.9, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00, BAYES_00 -1.90) X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-ID: oBGB1i9A005900 Received: from gkeramidas-glaptop.linux.gr ([74.125.57.36]) (authenticated bits=0) by igloo.linux.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id oBGB1i9A005900 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 16 Dec 2010 13:01:50 +0200 From: keramida@freebsd.org (Giorgos Keramidas) To: bsd References: <201012150800.oBF80FRf015357@mail.r-bonomi.com> <58F35D2B-19D0-4FE0-A4DA-03FDA8128BD2@todoo.biz> <391E3F03-4064-40FB-850E-C852C10D789A@todoo.biz> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:01:43 +0100 In-Reply-To: <391E3F03-4064-40FB-850E-C852C10D789A@todoo.biz> (bsd@todoo.biz's message of "Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:57:33 +0100") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Liste FreeBSD Subject: Re: Creating clone of a HDD including boot partition X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:02:01 -0000 On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 18:57:33 +0100, bsd wrote: > Le 15 d=E9c. 2010 =E0 16:45, Giorgos Keramidas a =E9crit : >> On Wed, 15 Dec 2010 16:11:45 +0100, bsd wrote: >>> Is there a way to dd to a file to create an iso image and then restore >>> (still using dd from this image). I only have one IDE <--> USB cable >>> so this is the reason why It'd more simple for me to create an iso >>> image of the disk and then restore. >>> >>> Using dump won't be very useful because I won't be able to get the >>> first 63 segments where boot info are written, I need something of >>> lower level (obviously dd will be my friend). >>> >>> Thanks everyone. I'll try to post the line code once I got It up and >>> running. >> >> No dd(1) cannot do that. >> >> What you _can_ do is boot into single-user mode, and then use mkisofs >> with burncd or growisofs from dvd+rw-tools to burn an image while still >> in single-user mode. The only user mode process is your root shell at >> that point, so you can be relatively sure there are no major changes >> happening somewhere at the filesystem while you are still dumping it to >> a CD-ROM or DVD-ROM disk. > > Just to be precise, I am not trying to do an ISO image of a running > root FS, but of a USB attached disk. Then it's much easier. Just mount the disk as read-only and use growisofs to dump its contents to a CD-ROM or DVD disk :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 16 11:40:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B480106564A for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:40:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd4michelle@tamay-dogan.net) Received: from mail.tamay-dogan.net (mail.tamay-dogan.net [88.168.69.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D23EC8FC13 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:40:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from michelle1.private.tamay-dogan.net (router.private.tamay-dogan.net [::ffff:192.168.0.65]) (AUTH: LOGIN michelle.konzack) by mail.tamay-dogan.net with esmtp; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:40:35 +0100 id 000E21E1.4D09FAB3.000037A7 Received: by michelle1.private.tamay-dogan.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:40:35 +0100 Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:40:35 +0100 From: Michelle Konzack To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101216114035.GB9509@michelle1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=_samba3-14247-1292499636-0001-2" Content-Disposition: inline X-Message-Flag: Improper configuration of Outlook is a breeding ground for viruses. Please take care your Client is configured correctly. Greetings Michelle. X-Disclaimer-DE: Eine weitere Verwendung oder die Veroeffentlichung dieser Mail oder dieser Mailadresse ist nur mit der Einwilligung des Autors gestattet. X-Disclaimer-EN: What are you looking here? X-Disclaimer-FR: Quest ce tu regarder ici? Organization: Tamay Dogan Network X-Operating-System: Linux michelle1 2.6.26-2-686 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Spam with fake address from the list? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:40:42 -0000 This is a MIME-formatted message. If you see this text it means that your E-mail software does not support MIME-formatted messages. --=_samba3-14247-1292499636-0001-2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello *, does someone get this kind of spam too? Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening Michelle Konzack ----- Forwarded message from freebsd-questions@freebsd.org ----- Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 07:55:59 +1100 =46rom: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org To: Michelle Konzack Subject: Re: Why do you use a devil as a mascot? X-TDMailSerialnumber: 10324672 Dear Sir/Madam, Your email was unable reach the intended person that you were sending it to. For more information on our business please click on the following link: [1]Click here for our website We look forward to your continued business in the future. Regards, Webmaster Verweise 1. http://www.xpbargains.net/ ----- End forwarded message ----- --=20 ##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant ###################### Development of Intranet and Embedded Systems with Debian GNU/Linux itsystems@tdnet France EURL itsystems@tdnet UG (limited liability) Owner Michelle Konzack Owner Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 (homeoffice) 50, rue de Soultz Kinzigstra=DFe 17 67100 Strasbourg/France 77694 Kehl/Germany Tel: +33-6-61925193 mobil Tel: +49-177-9351947 mobil Tel: +33-9-52705884 fix Jabber linux4michelle@jabber.ccc.de ICQ #328449886 Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ --=_samba3-14247-1292499636-0001-2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.pgp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFNCfqzC0FPBMSS+BIRAg0FAJwNbr/q9irK86kM094dsmnwPARGrQCgkF/P n3ZATMKt3DelgpP6OrayUtk= =QNfd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=_samba3-14247-1292499636-0001-2-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 16 11:44:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6941F106566B for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:44:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21B338FC0C for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:44:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 497A1E63D9; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:44:12 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from :to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=KXASuSPUqKla Nk5SWxs0prIK2LA=; b=UDJnvumnKlvBjGOVzuRrH1PYSmTW3vKgumIc/vwS13d2 r349ary9yO/yOiFNWCtTe/oOjgcaehmPa0KW/ixKAKsTtsqDoltQ1lLx6NmM57Sb HmNgC+ricmjWXRFGgV2NuOjCOglX6KNDpYho7OFFhUMVw4/cmYY3d710AbtOppg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from:to :cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=VIk/iw iibSWu97C6GS8EIlsp8IO3D2rzp5hkIwp9Krswp+JE0Nz5S8Rwh5Lau0kc/iaDkA qGt3Uv7gBJcTe6OhJ3LUX7aooL5YwXGVMWQ6IdtsT83SE6PzXQ+7n/Ia0pk7nKjZ 7fLM4Q0e6Y84cRAjpJ/oaWrCGKb1xPs4OfQKY= Received: from unknown (client-86-29-47-22.glfd.adsl.virginmedia.com [86.29.47.22]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 04D7BE60E5; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:44:11 +0000 (GMT) Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:44:09 +0000 From: Bruce Cran To: Michelle Konzack Message-ID: <20101216114409.00003b1c@unknown> In-Reply-To: <20101216114035.GB9509@michelle1> References: <20101216114035.GB9509@michelle1> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.16.0; i586-pc-mingw32msvc) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spam with fake address from the list? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:44:13 -0000 On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:40:35 +0100 Michelle Konzack wrote: > does someone get this kind of spam too? Yes, lots of people have been getting that for a few months. parklogic claim there's not anything they can do about it despite it apparently coming from their servers. -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 16 12:46:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EC871065673 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:46:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ey0-f178.google.com (mail-ey0-f178.google.com [209.85.215.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E66E8FC29 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:46:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyh5 with SMTP id 5so1619938eyh.37 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 04:46:30 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.12.194 with SMTP id y2mr459397eby.25.1292503590204; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 04:46:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.112.145 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 04:46:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.112.145 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 04:46:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101216114035.GB9509@michelle1> References: <20101216114035.GB9509@michelle1> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 07:46:30 -0500 Message-ID: From: Chris Brennan To: Michelle Konzack Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spam with fake address from the list? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:46:32 -0000 If you search the list for the last 2 weeks you will see some extensive posting about it. Use my name and Ian as reference points in your search. There are a few clues there to help you squash this issue. (Sorry for the top-post). -- Sent from my Droid On Dec 16, 2010 6:40 AM, "Michelle Konzack" wrote: > Hello *, > > does someone get this kind of spam too? > > Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening > Michelle Konzack > > ----- Forwarded message from freebsd-questions@freebsd.org ----- > > Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 07:55:59 +1100 > From: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > To: Michelle Konzack > Subject: Re: Why do you use a devil as a mascot? > X-TDMailSerialnumber: 10324672 > > Dear Sir/Madam, > Your email was unable reach the intended person that you were sending > it to. > For more information on our business please click on the following > link: > [1]Click here for our website > We look forward to your continued business in the future. > Regards, > Webmaster > > Verweise > > 1. http://www.xpbargains.net/ > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > -- > ##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant ###################### > Development of Intranet and Embedded Systems with Debian GNU/Linux > > itsystems@tdnet France EURL itsystems@tdnet UG (limited liability) > Owner Michelle Konzack Owner Michelle Konzack > > Apt. 917 (homeoffice) > 50, rue de Soultz Kinzigstra=C3=9Fe 17 > 67100 Strasbourg/France 77694 Kehl/Germany > Tel: +33-6-61925193 mobil Tel: +49-177-9351947 mobil > Tel: +33-9-52705884 fix > > > > > Jabber linux4michelle@jabber.ccc.de > ICQ #328449886 > > Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 16 13:13:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29C7B106566B for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 13:13:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phanquochien@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f68.google.com (mail-ww0-f68.google.com [74.125.82.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9C7D8FC1C for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 13:13:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwj40 with SMTP id 40so883875wwj.7 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 05:13:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=nDw8xVASYgzTdwmw+J1k0mcAOVPoqCEg+NJflEjidTs=; b=BMoswXHk+TEgM17pmeaKPv5NODF/TZDDBHy4HSQOjWVXoTIXVv72S3ret2rdphQhFG 4pmTUOwDe6+wLZOpXoFq+Q1Apqef0iC5ZJ8UaqfMRDINfuN+IYH7Y1iDf87W5g/nR6tH AKanLwP/iRU1Jz/btsaoRLv/dAtQqgjq1FD5o= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=uZC9HE/2HP86iY/CRV2+JJm/ruSWjkuf85M5uwwFQyQhalCclYi2EjIMN9uBopIeAk KsEiiSrJPluGj9zfbWXPc7QoIrCcCB1pjBBJTvTFAsvhVbVWZmMe6XaXLtD0O4fu1xOR +LZ1VPLVWBgpTuUsRveaf5YdabO3/CxpcHXmQ= Received: by 10.227.141.140 with SMTP id m12mr2671077wbu.48.1292501027248; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 04:03:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.136.139 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 04:03:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101216114035.GB9509@michelle1> References: <20101216114035.GB9509@michelle1> From: Phan Quoc Hien Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:03:27 +0700 Message-ID: To: Michelle Konzack Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spam with fake address from the list? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 13:13:08 -0000 Yes, I'm too! Spam from the list! On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Michelle Konzack < bsd4michelle@tamay-dogan.net> wrote: > Hello *, > > does someone get this kind of spam too? > > Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening > Michelle Konzack > > ----- Forwarded message from freebsd-questions@freebsd.org ----- > > Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 07:55:59 +1100 > From: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > To: Michelle Konzack > Subject: Re: Why do you use a devil as a mascot? > X-TDMailSerialnumber: 10324672 > > Dear Sir/Madam, > Your email was unable reach the intended person that you were sending > it to. > For more information on our business please click on the following > link: > [1]Click here for our website > We look forward to your continued business in the future. > Regards, > Webmaster > > Verweise > > 1. http://www.xpbargains.net/ > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > -- > ##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant ###################### > Development of Intranet and Embedded Systems with Debian GNU/Linux > > itsystems@tdnet France EURL itsystems@tdnet UG (limited liability) > Owner Michelle Konzack Owner Michelle Konzack > > Apt. 917 (homeoffice) > 50, rue de Soultz Kinzigstra=DFe 17 > 67100 Strasbourg/France 77694 Kehl/Germany > Tel: +33-6-61925193 mobil Tel: +49-177-9351947 mobil > Tel: +33-9-52705884 fix > > > > > Jabber linux4michelle@jabber.ccc.de > ICQ #328449886 > > Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ > --=20 Best regards, Mr.Hien E-mail: phanquochien@gmail.com Website: www.mrhien.info From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 16 13:39:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5949D106564A for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 13:39:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ns.kfs.ru) Received: from ns.kfs.ru (kfs.kfs.ru [194.186.81.194]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06D948FC19 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 13:39:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bsam by ns.kfs.ru with local (Exim 4.67 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1PTDO1-000EEz-45; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:56:45 +0300 To: "Dave" References: <20101215120036.DFC371065849@hub.freebsd.org> <4D095004.5513.2EF1E210@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:56:44 +0300 In-Reply-To: <4D095004.5513.2EF1E210@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> (dave@g8kbv.demon.co.uk's message of "Wed\, 15 Dec 2010 23\:32\:20 -0000") Message-ID: <47419283@serv3.int.kfs.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: "Boris B. Samorodov" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Noob Jail question. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 13:39:17 -0000 "Dave" writes: > I've been reading the FreeBSD Manual (a dangerous thing to do during > lunchtimes!) relating to Jails. Other than making my head spin, I'm > finding it a tad dificult finding out just what you can/cant do with a > Jail. Mainly, because I'm not familiar with a lot of the terms used, and > though the man pages are no doubt correct as a reference, they don't > "explain" it well, in as much as how to use it, well in my addled mind at > the moment. > > I think I'd like to run Hiawatha in a Jail, as it seems "the right thing > to do" with something that will be exposed to the www. > (Comments/advice?) > > But, how do I arrange it to safely get (read only) access to the website > data, without preventing the FTPD service from having access to update > that data. FTPD will only be reachable from LAN side of the main gateway > router, Hiawatha will have an outside world port forwarded to it by the > router. > > What I'm asking I guess, is.. Can a jail'd app, reach outside the jail > in "read only" mode. (I suspect, maybe?) Or can an app outside the > jail, drop stuff off inside the jail? (For whatever reason, I suspect > not?) > > If anyone understands what the heck I'm blathering on about, please > explain it to me, as I think I've lost the plot. > > Comments, advice, brickbats etc? You may try to use sysutils/ezjail to install/manage/etc jails. Using ezjail-admin is quite easy. Ezjails are realy light (they use readonly mount_nullfs to a basejail rather then real filesystems). Then you may consider using one jail for FTPD with write access and an other jail for HTTPD server with read-only access (say, readonly mount_nullfs) to those written by FTPD files/filesystems. -- WBR, bsam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 16 14:15:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA5141065670 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:15:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26CF88FC1B for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:15:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id oBGEFPKw018769; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 01:15:25 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 01:15:24 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Bruce Cran In-Reply-To: <20101216120053.58A8F1065712@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20101217000955.D83735@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20101216120053.58A8F1065712@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Michelle Konzack Subject: Re: Spam with fake address from the list? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:15:37 -0000 Re: freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 341, Issue 6, Message: 27 On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:44:09 +0000 Bruce Cran wrote: > On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 12:40:35 +0100 > Michelle Konzack wrote: > > > does someone get this kind of spam too? > > Yes, lots of people have been getting that for a few months. > parklogic claim there's not anything they can do about it despite it > apparently coming from their servers. If you researched the mob running parklogic, I suspect you'd tend to give any claims they may make scant credence, to say the very least. These forged messages were blocked inbound to the FreeBSD mailservers in August, but continue to be sent individually to participants harvested from messages posted to this list, and likely will continue to be. Since this is becoming a FAQ: To date all of these forged messages contain the following mail headers: > Return-Path: > Received: from dusk.parklogic.com (allmail.0b2.net [64.38.11.26]) Having your mailserver refuse connections from IP address 64.38.11.26 or domain 0b2.net, or envelopes sent by parklogic.com, definitively solves this problem. In sendmail /etc/mail/access syntax, use any or all of: From:parklogic.com REJECT Connect:64.38.11.26 REJECT Connect:0b2.net REJECT For those without control over their inbound mailserver, try to block or filter mail based on those Return-Path: or Received: headers above, or on the Message-ID: header which has always contained 'parklogic.com': > Message-ID: <20101110202251.16589.qmail@dusk.parklogic.com> And don't forget to wash your hands after flushing :) cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 16 14:20:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 786F4106566C for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:20:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DE9F8FC1B for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:20:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id oBGEHasM089478; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 09:17:36 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id oBGEHaYv089477; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 09:17:36 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 09:17:36 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Michelle Konzack Message-ID: <20101216141736.GD89293@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20101216114035.GB9509@michelle1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20101216114035.GB9509@michelle1> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spam with fake address from the list? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:20:37 -0000 On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:40:35PM +0100, Michelle Konzack wrote: > Hello *, > > does someone get this kind of spam too? Yes. Lots of it from various lists and other paths. Just delete it. ////jerry > > Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening > Michelle Konzack > > ----- Forwarded message from freebsd-questions@freebsd.org ----- > > Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 07:55:59 +1100 > From: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > To: Michelle Konzack > Subject: Re: Why do you use a devil as a mascot? > X-TDMailSerialnumber: 10324672 > > Dear Sir/Madam, > Your email was unable reach the intended person that you were sending > it to. > For more information on our business please click on the following > link: > [1]Click here for our website > We look forward to your continued business in the future. > Regards, > Webmaster > > Verweise > > 1. http://www.xpbargains.net/ > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > > -- > ##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant ###################### > Development of Intranet and Embedded Systems with Debian GNU/Linux > > itsystems@tdnet France EURL itsystems@tdnet UG (limited liability) > Owner Michelle Konzack Owner Michelle Konzack > > Apt. 917 (homeoffice) > 50, rue de Soultz Kinzigstraße 17 > 67100 Strasbourg/France 77694 Kehl/Germany > Tel: +33-6-61925193 mobil Tel: +49-177-9351947 mobil > Tel: +33-9-52705884 fix > > > > > Jabber linux4michelle@jabber.ccc.de > ICQ #328449886 > > Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 16 14:57:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CF58106566C for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:57:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F00568FC19 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:57:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBGEvIDY004485; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 07:57:18 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id oBGEvIEE004482; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 07:57:18 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 07:57:18 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: bsd In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <201012150800.oBF80FRf015357@mail.r-bonomi.com> <58F35D2B-19D0-4FE0-A4DA-03FDA8128BD2@todoo.biz> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 16 Dec 2010 07:57:18 -0700 (MST) Cc: Liste FreeBSD Subject: Re: Creating clone of a HDD including boot partition X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:57:19 -0000 On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, bsd wrote: > I have tried to use the compressed approach using smthg like: > > # mount /dev/ad0s1a /mnt > # cd /mnt > # dd if=/dev/zero of=zerofile bs=1M > > > I have a lot of errors on standerr output such as : > > g_vfs_done() : da0s1a [WRITE(offset=58978680256, length=131072)]error = 5 > > Up to a point where It has finaly freezed my running FBSD 8.1. > > > I don't think I have reached the end of the file? ?? No, it looks like either the drive or the USB adapter is having hardware problems. Using an external power supply for the drive may help, or maybe just dual USB connections (if it has them). Or connect through a powered hub. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 16 15:03:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C55541065673 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:03:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 459D58FC1B for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:03:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.homeip.net (c80-217-64-49.bredband.comhem.se [80.217.64.49]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id oBGF3Ahm024964; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:03:10 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Message-ID: <4D0A2A2D.1070607@bah.homeip.net> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:03:09 +0100 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; sv-SE; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101213 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: bsd References: <201012150800.oBF80FRf015357@mail.r-bonomi.com> <58F35D2B-19D0-4FE0-A4DA-03FDA8128BD2@todoo.biz> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: Liste FreeBSD Subject: Re: Creating clone of a HDD including boot partition X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:03:13 -0000 2010-12-16 11:55, bsd: > I have tried to use the compressed approach using smthg like: > > # mount /dev/ad0s1a /mnt > # cd /mnt > # dd if=/dev/zero of=zerofile bs=1M > > > I have a lot of errors on standerr output such as : > > g_vfs_done() : da0s1a [WRITE(offset=58978680256, length=131072)]error = 5 You have to little disk space, is my guess. > Up to a point where It has finaly freezed my running FBSD 8.1. To little to fast. > I don't think I have reached the end of the file… ?? > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 16 17:17:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A5241065693 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:17:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vic@yeaguy.com) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0A018FC16 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:17:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=NFUeGz0loTdi/T6hXKngYYtckjed7x3pKvNOqmBBK18= c=1 sm=0 a=PTGqXvldG18A:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=uRK6ZUxDawFwC8+94ldQlg==:17 a=hQVelDDQA1RvcOrFyZkA:9 a=XRcUT9yEphTZsgUTJIMRxG27BXoA:4 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=uRK6ZUxDawFwC8+94ldQlg==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 66.27.133.231 Received: from [66.27.133.231] ([66.27.133.231:62522] helo=[192.168.1.169]) by hrndva-oedge04.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 02/32-12606-D894A0D4; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:17:01 +0000 Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 09:16:54 -0800 (PST) From: "Justin V." To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII Cc: joko1425@hotmail.com Subject: Wifi keeps dropping.. not sure why, looking for tips/suggestions on debugging this X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:17:05 -0000 I keep seeing my wlan0 interface go down.. I suspected a faulty wifi router.. i changed that out.. Ive tried using WEP and WPA. Currently using WPA. Here are the logs Im seeing.. Dec 16 07:47:57 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED - Disconnect event - remove keys Dec 16 07:47:57 yeaguy kernel: wlan0: link state changed to DOWN Dec 16 07:47:57 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-RESULTS Dec 16 07:47:57 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Trying to associate with 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 (SSID='vicnet' freq=2462 MHz) Dec 16 07:48:07 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Authentication with 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 timed out. Dec 16 07:48:07 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-RESULTS Dec 16 07:48:07 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Trying to associate with 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 (SSID='vicnet' freq=2462 MHz) Dec 16 07:48:18 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Authentication with 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 timed out. Dec 16 07:48:20 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-RESULTS Dec 16 07:48:20 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Trying to associate with 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 (SSID='vicnet' freq=2462 MHz) Dec 16 07:48:20 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: WPA: EAPOL-Key Replay Counter did not increase - dropping packet Dec 16 07:48:20 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Associated with 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 Dec 16 07:48:20 yeaguy kernel: wlan0: link state changed to UP Given the errors seen what would be the best debug to use?? wlandebug or tcpdump ?? I went ahead and enabled since my logs are complaining about association and authentication.. yeaguy# wlandebug -i wlan0 auth+assoc net.wlan.0.debug: 0x0 => 0xc00000 yeaguy# Any tips would be appreciated.. I have an end user continually complaining of disconects over FTP.. Thanks, justin v From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 16 17:32:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D57D8106566B for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:32:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mubeeshalivm@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f49.google.com (mail-bw0-f49.google.com [209.85.214.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6022F8FC1F for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:32:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so3936534bwz.8 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 09:32:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=5g+TCLCR/Z7LRkGYer4Bn5QFtDxhUqXOMh/iMj2UO58=; b=g3XAoc+I1iyR13nLjC7N4ZrP41AsTi/Qcqv2iwzVTEhfgS+mUU9u+JYBogO0bG/Lyh FNVCg0wtjwLt/VIJVGdZXiSTcZLh5uCUxqWkpNQQ7cWXl0yjQE+RwcGAaKjuknUg0qOI Swfba6oZKbiwJlMTGVcPGDVTn/q55BXwHl/rM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Z3u95v3xODqlH/QBmdwJQWzR6to25S5dw3JmSnr0DB82JXza23CaexPWtbVSl5B3N7 kHcG5zeZAQajFgJdRtwYXmXGYdCOVT3vk0QWvDgIjeoNfLe0I49Acunr5b6k82hxmzyq /hwYNEmrIRd7VWpXa0EiTLvmdM87cdXhRr9R8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.46.134 with SMTP id j6mr8781197bkf.112.1292520726345; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 09:32:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.101.197 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 09:32:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 23:02:06 +0530 Message-ID: From: Mubeesh ali To: "Justin V." Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, joko1425@hotmail.com Subject: Re: Wifi keeps dropping.. not sure why, looking for tips/suggestions on debugging this X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:32:09 -0000 can u completely not send any traffic or is this a random drop. If random there could be interference causing replay counter mismatch. This may force AP to drop the packet, the ap may de authenticate client if it sees continuous stream of such packets in a short interval and force client to drop existing sessions like ftp. Please try changing the channel. If the client and AP are both A capable please try using the A band as there are more non overlapping channels and u may be able to find a channel with low interference. On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Justin V. wrote: > > I keep seeing my wlan0 interface go down.. =A0I suspected a faulty wifi > router.. i changed that out.. > > Ive tried using WEP and WPA. =A0Currently using WPA. > > Here are the logs Im seeing.. > > Dec 16 07:47:57 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED - > Disconnect event - remove keys > Dec 16 07:47:57 yeaguy kernel: wlan0: link state changed to DOWN > Dec 16 07:47:57 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-RESULTS > Dec 16 07:47:57 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Trying to associate with > 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 (SSID=3D'vicnet' freq=3D2462 MHz) > Dec 16 07:48:07 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Authentication with > 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 timed out. > Dec 16 07:48:07 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-RESULTS > Dec 16 07:48:07 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Trying to associate with > 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 (SSID=3D'vicnet' freq=3D2462 MHz) > Dec 16 07:48:18 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Authentication with > 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 timed out. > Dec 16 07:48:20 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-RESULTS > Dec 16 07:48:20 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Trying to associate with > 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 (SSID=3D'vicnet' freq=3D2462 MHz) > Dec 16 07:48:20 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: WPA: EAPOL-Key Replay Counte= r > did not increase - dropping packet > Dec 16 07:48:20 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Associated with > 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 > Dec 16 07:48:20 yeaguy kernel: wlan0: link state changed to UP > > Given the errors seen what would be the best debug to use?? > > wlandebug or tcpdump ?? > > I went ahead and enabled since my logs are complaining about association = and > authentication.. > > yeaguy# wlandebug -i wlan0 auth+assoc > net.wlan.0.debug: 0x0 =3D> 0xc00000 > yeaguy# > > > Any tips would be appreciated.. I have an end user continually complainin= g > of disconects over FTP.. > > > Thanks, > > justin v > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > --=20 Best=A0 Regards, Mubeesh Ali.V.M From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 16 17:46:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30A08106566C for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:46:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vic@yeaguy.com) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFF7C8FC15 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:46:35 +0000 (UTC) X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=dquaJDitHqzHCdqWSoZ6IgapSuTzW/4TaRYx9N9k4W8= c=1 sm=0 a=q_9cECTTNvIA:10 a=uRK6ZUxDawFwC8+94ldQlg==:17 a=iOhrDboYAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=gMfJIxdX8FNB92Q_8ygA:9 a=HTeN53E-WLs0Fx1xHewA:7 a=ai4eQaIeGoftMYJ-jIuKeJcPLj4A:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=-_C46MR6lL4A:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=uRK6ZUxDawFwC8+94ldQlg==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 66.27.133.231 Received: from [66.27.133.231] ([66.27.133.231:45233] helo=[192.168.1.169]) by hrndva-oedge01.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id CD/F5-14011-A705A0D4; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:46:35 +0000 Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 09:46:27 -0800 (PST) From: "Justin V." To: Mubeesh ali In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="623271173-516893176-1292521590=:12484" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, joko1425@hotmail.com Subject: Re: Wifi keeps dropping.. not sure why, looking for tips/suggestions on debugging this X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:46:36 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --623271173-516893176-1292521590=:12484 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, Mubeesh ali wrote: > can u completely not send any traffic or is this a random drop. If > random there could be interference causing replay counter mismatch. > This may force AP to drop the packet, the ap may de authenticate > client if it sees continuous stream of such packets in a short > interval and force client to drop existing sessions like ftp. > > Please try changing the channel. If the client and AP are both A > capable please try using the A band as there are more non overlapping > channels and u may be able to find a channel with low interference. > > > > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Justin V. wrote: >> >> I keep seeing my wlan0 interface go down..  I suspected a faulty wifi >> router.. i changed that out.. >> >> Ive tried using WEP and WPA.  Currently using WPA. >> >> Here are the logs Im seeing.. >> >> Dec 16 07:47:57 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED - >> Disconnect event - remove keys >> Dec 16 07:47:57 yeaguy kernel: wlan0: link state changed to DOWN >> Dec 16 07:47:57 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-RESULTS >> Dec 16 07:47:57 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Trying to associate with >> 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 (SSID='vicnet' freq=2462 MHz) >> Dec 16 07:48:07 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Authentication with >> 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 timed out. >> Dec 16 07:48:07 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-RESULTS >> Dec 16 07:48:07 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Trying to associate with >> 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 (SSID='vicnet' freq=2462 MHz) >> Dec 16 07:48:18 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Authentication with >> 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 timed out. >> Dec 16 07:48:20 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-RESULTS >> Dec 16 07:48:20 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Trying to associate with >> 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 (SSID='vicnet' freq=2462 MHz) >> Dec 16 07:48:20 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: WPA: EAPOL-Key Replay Counter >> did not increase - dropping packet >> Dec 16 07:48:20 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Associated with >> 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 >> Dec 16 07:48:20 yeaguy kernel: wlan0: link state changed to UP >> >> Given the errors seen what would be the best debug to use?? >> >> wlandebug or tcpdump ?? >> >> I went ahead and enabled since my logs are complaining about association and >> authentication.. >> >> yeaguy# wlandebug -i wlan0 auth+assoc >> net.wlan.0.debug: 0x0 => 0xc00000 >> yeaguy# >> >> >> Any tips would be appreciated.. I have an end user continually complaining >> of disconects over FTP.. >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> justin v >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > > -- > Best  Regards, > > Mubeesh Ali.V.M > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Hi Mubeesh, It seems to be a random drop.. FTP will be humming along and then wlan0 will go down.. I have the router set for channel 11... i do not have these types of drops with other wifi capable devices.. ex. WIN laptop, Playstaion 3... etc... rum0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 2290 ether 00:1e:e5:a8:bd:5a media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect mode 11g status: associated wlan0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 ether 00:1e:e5:a8:bd:5a inet 192.168.1.169 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet OFDM/18Mbps mode 11g status: associated ssid vicnet channel 11 (2462 MHz 11g) bssid 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 country US authmode WPA2/802.11i privacy ON deftxkey UNDEF AES-CCM 2:128-bit AES-CCM 3:128-bit txpower 0 bmiss 7 scanvalid 450 bgscan bgscanintvl 300 bgscanidle 250 roam:rssi 7 roam:rate 5 protmode CTS roaming MANUAL Also yesterday, I lost complete connectivity to the router while my WIN PC was connected and browsing just fine.. I had to bounce the interface and reset the default gateway and my connection restored. I did: /etc/rc.d/netif restart && /etc/rc.d/routing restart Thanks, Justin --623271173-516893176-1292521590=:12484-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 16 18:11:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8BD1106566C for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:11:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matej.serc@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pv0-f182.google.com (mail-pv0-f182.google.com [74.125.83.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EBED8FC13 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:11:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pvc22 with SMTP id 22so583273pvc.13 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:11:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=h1YdzkPJd3Dqfhqnsm/Afa6SWPZLCTGIvq3BzhBz7jQ=; b=erbRBcBefduf6ip3VsplhK8FydvbL9tLmvE/KRLxR/97XbyvrLifn0uGJ88heqlLBm Hl3Pzoqipdt7v7WzceFcgSkhl39Df+FCbnWzEIAz5jR2n/tkbMslH+8pTGwnh2LsYb4T hPPVsM9Ihnd6KHmtm3hmdZc4+kfrpkTaIAeGA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=bwahVKgn6+L6nq7MyGXX6bRELFStUgVG/EmGtqlDyjacvVxn0JV6kBS+ID5NN7ar4Z q0m2iKnqOEaYHSI3/UPt5588V58ROrEGTH0TyxV0Z/m3Zu/7oqVWJQRtHyBO1h3ZXUyj 1YGbfCtDbyOVL6V6lfTPC3ukLu62KrFsccdpE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.221.13 with SMTP id t13mr7090629wfg.56.1292521352212; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 09:42:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.143.35.21 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 09:42:32 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:42:32 +0100 Message-ID: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Matej_=C5=A0erc?= To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE amd64 hangs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:11:46 -0000 Hi, I am experiencing a strange issue that has never occurred to me in all the years of using different versions of FreeBSD. One of our servers, which was running without any issues until yesterday, stopped responding for two times now - yesterday and today. About three days ago another process of pulling out SNMP data from devices was added, but I was looking the system load and the system was working normally and also processes were cmpleting successfully within the timeframe of 5 minutes (much faster, they completed in about 2 minutes). I also want to mention that those SNMP pulling processes were already working about a month or so on the same server (no hardware was changed in the meantime) and I am pretty sure that it should work normally as it did. My main problem is, that there is abcolutely nothing in log files - no errors, no warnings, nothing. No strange messages, every process just stops logging at one time and then continues after the reboot. Another interesting issue is that both hangs occured at approximately the same time, but there was nobody in the server room and also no one was logged into the server at that time except me. About 10 minutes before hang I was investigating processes and everything was very normal - no large CPU eating or memory eating processes. This might be interesting, even after every process stops responding, I was still able to ping the network interfaces and receive ICMP replies back. Of course my idea about it is that it must be connected to some hardware problems - my suggestion was to make some memory tests. But I would like to hear some your oppinions about the entire situation. Could some power supply issues be doing it? The server is about a year old and has, as I already mentioned, worked like a charm until now. How come there is no kernel panic since no daemon seems to be working? Why is network interface still up and working? I was unable to go to the co-location facility so I can't say what was on the screen at both times, but I suppose there was nothing else than messages I can read from log files. I know that 7.2 is pretty old version, but it was working until now on the same hardware and we had no reason to change that. Now the system is after reboot again running smoothly and without any issues at all. Thank you very much for any information regarding the issue. BR, Matej From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 16 18:21:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 176751065694 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:21:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mubeeshalivm@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f49.google.com (mail-bw0-f49.google.com [209.85.214.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CFCF8FC15 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:21:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz5 with SMTP id 5so3998986bwz.8 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:21:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9GdcQvvMYPfl8ZQ8SaCs3CGBkossgxEPJ2ZHqzUYpys=; b=KsPWzPsnoOP0589bjFuKdWn8/dtpn4FgSC4joWtluiXYy2SJbE4vp1ntWCvtE+L7L5 GanBsUTH3YB17TIEeye3I1mdV/QhX2sY/F+c6c6dlFWfJj91xj1O7g8871rh/iuNW3E/ LOXQ5uVHP+riHLaRfVXOaUUidumpkPKTYPd74= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=h6KylvskvJpdnYGnUPekA41fbAv1/Y/iXkBVLm8klxx8uegM3ug5DWSdXfROxUQthf PJn5AHsvAHPbq0JvfTBEs7ttOLMFL05deZ72O43WcrlV6nb3O9ZrV1phaP7ahhtnvnib 5ODj8tjJKBWmDdfYm2iuQQlT9qUyM7Dqpu9uI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.65.135 with SMTP id j7mr8814143bki.85.1292523681348; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:21:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.101.197 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 10:21:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 23:51:21 +0530 Message-ID: From: Mubeesh ali To: "Justin V." Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, joko1425@hotmail.com Subject: Re: Wifi keeps dropping.. not sure why, looking for tips/suggestions on debugging this X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:21:23 -0000 Hi Justin, I see 7 beacon misses on the interface which is not good the client disconnects on beacon miss...typically most ap's are configured to send a beacon every 100 ms . ..this looks similar http://madwifi-project.org/ticket/1957 thanks, Mubeesh On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 11:16 PM, Justin V. wrote: > > > On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, Mubeesh ali wrote: > >> can u completely not send any traffic or is this a random drop. If >> random there could be interference causing replay counter mismatch. >> This may force AP to drop the packet, =A0the ap may de authenticate >> client if it sees continuous stream of such packets in a short >> interval and force client to drop existing sessions like ftp. >> >> Please try changing the channel. If the client and AP are both A >> capable please try using the A band as there are more non overlapping >> channels and u may be able to find a channel with low interference. >> >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Justin V. wrote: >>> >>> I keep seeing my wlan0 interface go down.. =A0I suspected a faulty wifi >>> router.. i changed that out.. >>> >>> Ive tried using WEP and WPA. =A0Currently using WPA. >>> >>> Here are the logs Im seeing.. >>> >>> Dec 16 07:47:57 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED - >>> Disconnect event - remove keys >>> Dec 16 07:47:57 yeaguy kernel: wlan0: link state changed to DOWN >>> Dec 16 07:47:57 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-RESULTS >>> Dec 16 07:47:57 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Trying to associate with >>> 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 (SSID=3D'vicnet' freq=3D2462 MHz) >>> Dec 16 07:48:07 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Authentication with >>> 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 timed out. >>> Dec 16 07:48:07 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-RESULTS >>> Dec 16 07:48:07 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Trying to associate with >>> 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 (SSID=3D'vicnet' freq=3D2462 MHz) >>> Dec 16 07:48:18 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Authentication with >>> 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 timed out. >>> Dec 16 07:48:20 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-RESULTS >>> Dec 16 07:48:20 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Trying to associate with >>> 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 (SSID=3D'vicnet' freq=3D2462 MHz) >>> Dec 16 07:48:20 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: WPA: EAPOL-Key Replay >>> Counter >>> did not increase - dropping packet >>> Dec 16 07:48:20 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Associated with >>> 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 >>> Dec 16 07:48:20 yeaguy kernel: wlan0: link state changed to UP >>> >>> Given the errors seen what would be the best debug to use?? >>> >>> wlandebug or tcpdump ?? >>> >>> I went ahead and enabled since my logs are complaining about associatio= n >>> and >>> authentication.. >>> >>> yeaguy# wlandebug -i wlan0 auth+assoc >>> net.wlan.0.debug: 0x0 =3D> 0xc00000 >>> yeaguy# >>> >>> >>> Any tips would be appreciated.. I have an end user continually >>> complaining >>> of disconects over FTP.. >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> justin v >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Best=A0 Regards, >> >> Mubeesh Ali.V.M >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > > Hi Mubeesh, > > It seems to be a random drop.. FTP will be humming along and then wlan0 w= ill > go down.. > > I have the router set for channel 11... > > i do not have these types of drops with other wifi capable devices.. > > ex. =A0WIN laptop, Playstaion 3... etc... > > > > rum0: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu 2= 290 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0ether 00:1e:e5:a8:bd:5a > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect mode 11g > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0status: associated > wlan0: flags=3D8843 metric 0 mtu = 1500 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0ether 00:1e:e5:a8:bd:5a > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0inet 192.168.1.169 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.= 255 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet OFDM/18Mbps mode 11g > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0status: associated > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0ssid vicnet channel 11 (2462 MHz 11g) bssid 00:22:6b:66:bf= :74 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0country US authmode WPA2/802.11i privacy ON deftxkey UNDEF > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0AES-CCM 2:128-bit AES-CCM 3:128-bit txpower 0 bmiss 7 scan= valid 450 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0bgscan bgscanintvl 300 bgscanidle 250 roam:rssi 7 roam:rat= e 5 > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0protmode CTS roaming MANUAL > > > > Also yesterday, I lost complete connectivity to the router while my WIN P= C > was connected and browsing just fine.. > > I had to bounce the interface and reset the default gateway and my > connection restored. > > I did: > > /etc/rc.d/netif restart && /etc/rc.d/routing restart > > > Thanks, > > Justin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 16 18:56:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AA1D1065670 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:56:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BA038FC1A for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:56:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.homeip.net (c80-217-64-49.bredband.comhem.se [80.217.64.49]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id oBGIujuY028365; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:56:46 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Message-ID: <4D0A60ED.3020801@bah.homeip.net> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:56:45 +0100 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; sv-SE; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101213 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Michelle Konzack References: <20101216114035.GB9509@michelle1> In-Reply-To: <20101216114035.GB9509@michelle1> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spam with fake address from the list? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:56:48 -0000 2010-12-16 12:40, Michelle Konzack: > Hello *, > > does someone get this kind of spam too? No, nothing from the ip-range 69.170.128.0/24 is getting thru. > Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening > Michelle Konzack > > ----- Forwarded message from freebsd-questions@freebsd.org ----- > > Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 07:55:59 +1100 > From: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > To: Michelle Konzack > Subject: Re: Why do you use a devil as a mascot? > X-TDMailSerialnumber: 10324672 > > Dear Sir/Madam, > Your email was unable reach the intended person that you were sending > it to. > For more information on our business please click on the following > link: > [1]Click here for our website > We look forward to your continued business in the future. > Regards, > Webmaster > > Verweise > > 1. http://www.xpbargains.net/ > > ----- End forwarded message ----- > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 16 18:59:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F468106564A for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:59:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from svein-listmail@stillbilde.net) Received: from mail.stillbilde.net (d80.iso100.no [81.175.61.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B95E18FC15 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:59:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (unknown [192.168.12.4]) (Authenticated sender: svein-listmail) by mail.stillbilde.net (Familien Skogens mail) with ESMTPSA id 6FFCE27 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:59:45 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4D0A619E.2000100@stillbilde.net> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:59:42 +0100 From: "Svein Skogen (Listmail account)" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101216114035.GB9509@michelle1> <4D0A60ED.3020801@bah.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <4D0A60ED.3020801@bah.homeip.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig657D4EBB47D972EA292CCF0B" Subject: Re: Spam with fake address from the list? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:59:49 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig657D4EBB47D972EA292CCF0B Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 16.12.2010 19:56, Bernt Hansson wrote: > 2010-12-16 12:40, Michelle Konzack: >> Hello *, >> >> does someone get this kind of spam too? >=20 > No, nothing from the ip-range 69.170.128.0/24 is getting thru. I actually have a very specific route, just for them, in my border gatewa= y: ip route 64.38.11.26 255.255.255.255 Null0 Let's just say that I have ... views on incurable spammers. //Svein --=20 --------+-------------------+------------------------------- /"\ |Svein Skogen | svein@d80.iso100.no \ / |Solberg =D8stli 9 | PGP Key: 0xE5E76831 X |2020 Skedsmokorset | svein@jernhuset.no / \ |Norway | PGP Key: 0xCE96CE13 | | svein@stillbilde.net ascii | | PGP Key: 0x58CD33B6 ribbon |System Admin | svein-listmail@stillbilde.net Campaign|stillbilde.net | PGP Key: 0x22D494A4 +-------------------+------------------------------- |msn messenger: | Mobile Phone: +47 907 03 575 |svein@jernhuset.no | RIPE handle: SS16503-RIPE --------+-------------------+------------------------------- A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? A: Top-posting. Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? ------------------------------------------------------------ Picture Gallery: https://gallery.stillbilde.net/v/svein/ ------------------------------------------------------------ --------------enig657D4EBB47D972EA292CCF0B Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk0KYaIACgkQODUnwSLUlKSwZgCggzjXoxlmvNQ4B9IzsvEezL9b PJEAnRm1v5zeJcXIIwjBOiHXE1QswvT2 =2lUF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig657D4EBB47D972EA292CCF0B-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 16 19:28:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10776106566C for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:28:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vic@yeaguy.com) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.122]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDDEC8FC16 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:28:12 +0000 (UTC) X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=NFUeGz0loTdi/T6hXKngYYtckjed7x3pKvNOqmBBK18= c=1 sm=0 a=q_9cECTTNvIA:10 a=uRK6ZUxDawFwC8+94ldQlg==:17 a=NSjPWQjWAAAA:8 a=iOhrDboYAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=0nlizQo0W3Gp6Brk18EA:9 a=mFbtmDhpONYTot6Neb8A:7 a=Cvcko-BPMoAb86d1N7NnAvG0TREA:4 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=-_C46MR6lL4A:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=uRK6ZUxDawFwC8+94ldQlg==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 66.27.133.231 Received: from [66.27.133.231] ([66.27.133.231:49208] helo=[192.168.1.169]) by hrndva-oedge04.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 1D/E1-12606-B486A0D4; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:28:11 +0000 Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 11:28:05 -0800 (PST) From: "Justin V." To: Mubeesh ali In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="623271173-1861651850-1292527686=:12797" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, joko1425@hotmail.com Subject: Re: Wifi keeps dropping.. not sure why, looking for tips/suggestions on debugging this X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:28:13 -0000 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --623271173-1861651850-1292527686=:12797 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, Mubeesh ali wrote: > Hi Justin, > > I see 7 beacon misses on the interface which is not good the client > disconnects on beacon miss...typically most ap's are configured to > send a beacon every 100 ms . ..this looks similar > http://madwifi-project.org/ticket/1957 > > > thanks, > Mubeesh > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 11:16 PM, Justin V. wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, Mubeesh ali wrote: >> >>> can u completely not send any traffic or is this a random drop. If >>> random there could be interference causing replay counter mismatch. >>> This may force AP to drop the packet,  the ap may de authenticate >>> client if it sees continuous stream of such packets in a short >>> interval and force client to drop existing sessions like ftp. >>> >>> Please try changing the channel. If the client and AP are both A >>> capable please try using the A band as there are more non overlapping >>> channels and u may be able to find a channel with low interference. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Justin V. wrote: >>>> >>>> I keep seeing my wlan0 interface go down..  I suspected a faulty wifi >>>> router.. i changed that out.. >>>> >>>> Ive tried using WEP and WPA.  Currently using WPA. >>>> >>>> Here are the logs Im seeing.. >>>> >>>> Dec 16 07:47:57 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED - >>>> Disconnect event - remove keys >>>> Dec 16 07:47:57 yeaguy kernel: wlan0: link state changed to DOWN >>>> Dec 16 07:47:57 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-RESULTS >>>> Dec 16 07:47:57 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Trying to associate with >>>> 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 (SSID='vicnet' freq=2462 MHz) >>>> Dec 16 07:48:07 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Authentication with >>>> 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 timed out. >>>> Dec 16 07:48:07 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-RESULTS >>>> Dec 16 07:48:07 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Trying to associate with >>>> 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 (SSID='vicnet' freq=2462 MHz) >>>> Dec 16 07:48:18 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Authentication with >>>> 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 timed out. >>>> Dec 16 07:48:20 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-RESULTS >>>> Dec 16 07:48:20 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Trying to associate with >>>> 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 (SSID='vicnet' freq=2462 MHz) >>>> Dec 16 07:48:20 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: WPA: EAPOL-Key Replay >>>> Counter >>>> did not increase - dropping packet >>>> Dec 16 07:48:20 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Associated with >>>> 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 >>>> Dec 16 07:48:20 yeaguy kernel: wlan0: link state changed to UP >>>> >>>> Given the errors seen what would be the best debug to use?? >>>> >>>> wlandebug or tcpdump ?? >>>> >>>> I went ahead and enabled since my logs are complaining about association >>>> and >>>> authentication.. >>>> >>>> yeaguy# wlandebug -i wlan0 auth+assoc >>>> net.wlan.0.debug: 0x0 => 0xc00000 >>>> yeaguy# >>>> >>>> >>>> Any tips would be appreciated.. I have an end user continually >>>> complaining >>>> of disconects over FTP.. >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> justin v >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best  Regards, >>> >>> Mubeesh Ali.V.M >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >> >> >> >> Hi Mubeesh, >> >> It seems to be a random drop.. FTP will be humming along and then wlan0 will >> go down.. >> >> I have the router set for channel 11... >> >> i do not have these types of drops with other wifi capable devices.. >> >> ex.  WIN laptop, Playstaion 3... etc... >> >> >> >> rum0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 2290 >>        ether 00:1e:e5:a8:bd:5a >>        media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect mode 11g >>        status: associated >> wlan0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu 1500 >>        ether 00:1e:e5:a8:bd:5a >>        inet 192.168.1.169 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 >>        media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet OFDM/18Mbps mode 11g >>        status: associated >>        ssid vicnet channel 11 (2462 MHz 11g) bssid 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 >>        country US authmode WPA2/802.11i privacy ON deftxkey UNDEF >>        AES-CCM 2:128-bit AES-CCM 3:128-bit txpower 0 bmiss 7 scanvalid 450 >>        bgscan bgscanintvl 300 bgscanidle 250 roam:rssi 7 roam:rate 5 >>        protmode CTS roaming MANUAL >> >> >> >> Also yesterday, I lost complete connectivity to the router while my WIN PC >> was connected and browsing just fine.. >> >> I had to bounce the interface and reset the default gateway and my >> connection restored. >> >> I did: >> >> /etc/rc.d/netif restart && /etc/rc.d/routing restart >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Justin > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > interesting.. do you know of a better adapter to use?? ive done a search on wlan0 and bmiss.. alot of threads regarding that issue, but all the threads show "bmiss 7" ?? does that seem odd?? --623271173-1861651850-1292527686=:12797-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 16 19:38:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F28A71065697 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:38:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@g8kbv.demon.co.uk) Received: from lon1-post-2.mail.demon.net (lon1-post-2.mail.demon.net [195.173.77.149]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBB098FC16 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:38:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.225.127.64] (helo=[192.168.33.1]) by lon1-post-2.mail.demon.net with esmtpa (AUTH g8kbv) (Exim 4.69) id 1PTJf4-0001Wp-bI for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:38:46 +0000 From: "Dave" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:38:46 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <4D0A6AC6.4995.44283A1@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> Priority: normal In-reply-to: <4D099A80.6030808@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <20101215120036.DFC371065849@hub.freebsd.org>, <4D095004.5513.2EF1E210@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk>, <4D099A80.6030808@herveybayaustralia.com.au> X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.52) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body Subject: Re: Noob Jail question. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:38:48 -0000 On 16 Dec 2010 at 14:50, Da Rock wrote: > On 12/16/10 09:32, Dave wrote: > > Hi. > > > > As some of you may remember, I've managed to build a F'BSD V8.0 > > based system that provides me with:- . . . . > Hi.. Indexer and Da Rock, many thanks, more reading, and some fiddling needed I think. Cheers. Dave B. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 16 20:07:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8128106564A for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:07:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from derek@csolve.net) Received: from mail.csolve.net (mail.csolve.net [207.164.80.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4F698FC0A for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:07:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alpha.csolve.local ([10.10.18.126]) by mail.csolve.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1PTJv8-000BCN-9s for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:55:22 -0500 From: Derek Buttineau Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:55:22 -0500 Message-Id: <08F24695-200B-4C7E-B665-B36E325B4C72@csolve.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Authenticated-Id: derek@csolve.net Subject: Usage Based Tracking X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:07:30 -0000 Bell Canada is implementing Usage Based Billing to its wholesale DSL = customers. Is anyone on this list familiar with this and if so do you = foresee having to increase or dramatically change current internal usage = based monitoring to be able to support and/or substantiate the = information Bell will be providing for billing? -- Regards, Derek Buttineau Compu-SOLVE Technologies, Inc From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 16 22:00:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BC78106564A for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 22:00:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from onemda@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 971378FC15 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 22:00:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so25486qwj.13 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:00:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=gLryCP1s4y6vE8yNwKRN+b8yF7JJPFK5HuTKwCbm99Q=; b=T84z7YPEEfGQmFCPnSVDZM+sDmgux/Ru8j/Dna00hO6oOzhEO8xIonpSf1LKuXoAIG AfILV9be6UHLI7YK0aWmJWxTownbo5r6+F1/aMv6NU2xariRrwpPF5bJEB8wMoTvYS24 uA9ARm+Zeq2nIwWcXCyw9qQECdqv2nVsgiu7s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=P4uH6diCkjzUNzfgwV/dvVsmv0qBcjmy6Sv+GsfGyVAkOBgRMax9SkNGUqhfScufPi ECnV29VxekRJMbD23kQJYRcxAzzXX6EH7Bm0BydJb0su664Ug0k7xAzVvQ19IoRq1dkk Ea2IVOj5GF6LK1cPT7UunmDsY+Vkkj2WmH21k= Received: by 10.224.11.68 with SMTP id s4mr4374669qas.385.1292536826751; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:00:26 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.175.141 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:00:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Paul B Mahol Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 22:00:06 +0000 Message-ID: To: "Justin V." Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Mubeesh ali , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, joko1425@hotmail.com Subject: Re: Wifi keeps dropping.. not sure why, looking for tips/suggestions on debugging this X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 22:00:29 -0000 On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Justin V. wrote: > interesting.. do you know of a better adapter to use?? > > ive done a search on wlan0 and bmiss.. alot of threads regarding that issue, > but all the threads show "bmiss 7" ?? does that seem odd?? FYI, you can change bmiss value with ifconfig(8). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 16 22:05:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BF3F106564A for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 22:05:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd@todoo.biz) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [87.98.206.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A1D28FC13 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 22:05:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E47A78C21 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 23:05:39 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new 2.6.4 (20090625) at rmm.fr Received: from newmail.rmm.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id beYWKcIgUi6h for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 23:05:39 +0100 (CET) Received: from newmail.rmm.fr (newmail.rmm.fr [87.98.206.99]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hidden) by newmail.rmm.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C27A078C19 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 23:05:38 +0100 (CET) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) From: bsd In-Reply-To: <4D0A2A2D.1070607@bah.homeip.net> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 23:05:37 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <1A4BE241-5B74-4BDA-B13F-DF1B3F30B30B@todoo.biz> References: <201012150800.oBF80FRf015357@mail.r-bonomi.com> <58F35D2B-19D0-4FE0-A4DA-03FDA8128BD2@todoo.biz> <4D0A2A2D.1070607@bah.homeip.net> To: Liste FreeBSD X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Subject: Re: Creating clone of a HDD including boot partition X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 22:05:40 -0000 Le 16 d=E9c. 2010 =E0 16:03, Bernt Hansson a =E9crit : > 2010-12-16 11:55, bsd: >=20 >> I have tried to use the compressed approach using smthg like: >>=20 >> # mount /dev/ad0s1a /mnt >> # cd /mnt >> # dd if=3D/dev/zero of=3Dzerofile bs=3D1M >>=20 >>=20 >> I have a lot of errors on standerr output such as : >>=20 >> g_vfs_done() : da0s1a [WRITE(offset=3D58978680256, = length=3D131072)]error =3D 5 >=20 > You have to little disk space, is my guess. >=20 >> Up to a point where It has finaly freezed my running FBSD 8.1. >=20 > To little to fast. >=20 >> I don't think I have reached the end of the file=85 ?? >>=20 Ok,=20 I have got It working.=20 I have created an 736 MB archive of my 160 GB hard drive.=20 Now I am trying to restore It from my mac with :=20 $ gzcat pfSense_HDD.gz | dd of=3D/dev/disk1 bs=3D1m It has started at 19h52 and at 32h02 it is still not finished=85=20 I thing I'll go to sleep and see if the baby is born tomorow morning.=20 Is there anything I can do to speed up the process ? Anyway thank you for all this useful help.=20 =96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96= =96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96 ---------> Gr=E9gory Bernard Director <--------- ---------------> www.osnet.eu <--------------- --> Your provider of OpenSource appliances <-- =96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96= =96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96=96 OSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetOSnetO From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 16 22:45:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E88A106566C for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 22:45:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f49.google.com (mail-fx0-f49.google.com [209.85.161.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F7F68FC14 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 22:45:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm19 with SMTP id 19so65773fxm.36 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:45:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=waDk68qrgXvyKWjMhaKjn0uNAJT/nzMwqLfh+z4RR2M=; b=koVsPp0RU+coFEzRhMCOHqMI78/4bII8IVeANJLEWTlerfMCK9gFwbgWg1BJjbj4Wc l+48457t0UwOtGDNcyAs1M943YCWxScFXMFZgZzHmLqGjDHZoxQSnsMz6z34RonDM40E NyqXBFschpwbiAIoHatx/04gEeb32mGF1XPPM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=BOj+wA6KVY09leJc/HXdsAaZVdWtXV3OZXeUqh1IdQO6uL8MUeaa8HYOpoT1MOxTkF HDobQDat2cJPKVX4x4PuuSFbPXQAUn4trKpsv8D1V61ozKGlXPsXFbXFRs8Mq60kxBRG a5d3sGDNZlAX1DQJkIAcsxuMzgShYnKw9fLKE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.95.202 with SMTP id e10mr377837fan.32.1292539554614; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:45:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.114.4 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 14:45:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1A4BE241-5B74-4BDA-B13F-DF1B3F30B30B@todoo.biz> References: <201012150800.oBF80FRf015357@mail.r-bonomi.com> <58F35D2B-19D0-4FE0-A4DA-03FDA8128BD2@todoo.biz> <4D0A2A2D.1070607@bah.homeip.net> <1A4BE241-5B74-4BDA-B13F-DF1B3F30B30B@todoo.biz> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:45:54 -0600 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: bsd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Liste FreeBSD Subject: Re: Creating clone of a HDD including boot partition X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 22:45:56 -0000 On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 4:05 PM, bsd wrote: > > $ gzcat pfSense_HDD.gz | dd of=/dev/disk1 bs=1m > > > Is there anything I can do to speed up the process ? > Not without interrupting it, but prior to that you could have done things like testing for optimal bs=. 1m should perform ok, but you may have been able to get better throughput with a smaller value. http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance/2005-October/001555.html If they are IDE drive make sure they are on different controllers eg not in a master/slave arrangement. Buy a faster /dev/disk1 -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 16 23:53:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71F83106566C for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 23:53:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vic@yeaguy.com) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D2658FC12 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 23:53:42 +0000 (UTC) X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=UQuFHoD2CPQ248x8AXEbKhr4z9AaDqApxmEl3BhfZ64= c=1 sm=0 a=q_9cECTTNvIA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=uRK6ZUxDawFwC8+94ldQlg==:17 a=iOhrDboYAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=GVJXVApER8_hKCjfQSsA:9 a=-3dOxN7gq0Y474WYhTQA:7 a=zeGX63i-InrADMOpNuk8r4mBYwEA:4 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=-_C46MR6lL4A:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=uRK6ZUxDawFwC8+94ldQlg==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 66.27.133.231 Received: from [66.27.133.231] ([66.27.133.231:10925] helo=[192.168.1.169]) by hrndva-oedge02.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 13/78-00963-586AA0D4; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 23:53:42 +0000 Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 15:53:35 -0800 (PST) From: "Justin V." To: Paul B Mahol In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Mubeesh ali , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, joko1425@hotmail.com Subject: Re: Wifi keeps dropping.. not sure why, looking for tips/suggestions on debugging this X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 23:53:43 -0000 On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, Paul B Mahol wrote: > On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Justin V. wrote: >> interesting.. do you know of a better adapter to use?? >> >> ive done a search on wlan0 and bmiss.. alot of threads regarding that issue, >> but all the threads show "bmiss 7" ?? does that seem odd?? > > FYI, you can change bmiss value with ifconfig(8). > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > i am going to reconfig the bmiss to 200 and see how the int handles traffic load after that. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 00:58:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4A191065679 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 00:58:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gull@gull.us) Received: from mail-ew0-f51.google.com (mail-ew0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 757EB8FC0C for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 00:58:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so76610ewy.10 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:58:35 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.124.201 with SMTP id x49mr201991eeh.7.1292547515305; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:58:35 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.47.78 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:58:35 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [64.81.163.112] In-Reply-To: References: <20101125230217.GA25485@thought.org> <4CEFA3DD.9090106@qeng-ho.org> <4CF1395D.27634.1829768@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 16:58:35 -0800 Message-ID: From: David Brodbeck To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: next question.... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 00:58:36 -0000 On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Chris Brennan wrote: > When sudo'ing, pass 'sudo su -' (same principle applies, but you don't need > to to be in wheel to use this command) Is the end result of 'sudo su - ' any different from the simpler command 'sudo -i'? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 01:42:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44F9B106564A for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 01:42:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C42388FC0C for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 01:42:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.193]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FA1E5C21 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:47:23 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4D0ABF2E.7080900@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:38:54 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101119 Thunderbird/3.0.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Wifi keeps dropping.. not sure why, looking for tips/suggestions on debugging this X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 01:42:34 -0000 On 12/17/10 03:46, Justin V. wrote: > > > On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, Mubeesh ali wrote: > >> can u completely not send any traffic or is this a random drop. If >> random there could be interference causing replay counter mismatch. >> This may force AP to drop the packet, the ap may de authenticate >> client if it sees continuous stream of such packets in a short >> interval and force client to drop existing sessions like ftp. >> >> Please try changing the channel. If the client and AP are both A >> capable please try using the A band as there are more non overlapping >> channels and u may be able to find a channel with low interference. >> >> >> >> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Justin V. wrote: >>> >>> I keep seeing my wlan0 interface go down.. I suspected a faulty wifi >>> router.. i changed that out.. >>> >>> Ive tried using WEP and WPA. Currently using WPA. >>> >>> Here are the logs Im seeing.. >>> >>> Dec 16 07:47:57 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED - >>> Disconnect event - remove keys >>> Dec 16 07:47:57 yeaguy kernel: wlan0: link state changed to DOWN >>> Dec 16 07:47:57 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-RESULTS >>> Dec 16 07:47:57 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Trying to associate with >>> 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 (SSID='vicnet' freq=2462 MHz) >>> Dec 16 07:48:07 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Authentication with >>> 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 timed out. >>> Dec 16 07:48:07 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-RESULTS >>> Dec 16 07:48:07 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Trying to associate with >>> 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 (SSID='vicnet' freq=2462 MHz) >>> Dec 16 07:48:18 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Authentication with >>> 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 timed out. >>> Dec 16 07:48:20 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-RESULTS >>> Dec 16 07:48:20 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Trying to associate with >>> 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 (SSID='vicnet' freq=2462 MHz) >>> Dec 16 07:48:20 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: WPA: EAPOL-Key Replay >>> Counter >>> did not increase - dropping packet >>> Dec 16 07:48:20 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Associated with >>> 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 >>> Dec 16 07:48:20 yeaguy kernel: wlan0: link state changed to UP >>> >>> Given the errors seen what would be the best debug to use?? >>> >>> wlandebug or tcpdump ?? >>> >>> I went ahead and enabled since my logs are complaining about >>> association and >>> authentication.. >>> >>> yeaguy# wlandebug -i wlan0 auth+assoc >>> net.wlan.0.debug: 0x0 => 0xc00000 >>> yeaguy# >>> >>> >>> Any tips would be appreciated.. I have an end user continually >>> complaining >>> of disconects over FTP.. >>> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> justin v >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Best Regards, >> >> Mubeesh Ali.V.M >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > > Hi Mubeesh, > > It seems to be a random drop.. FTP will be humming along and then > wlan0 will go down.. > > I have the router set for channel 11... > > i do not have these types of drops with other wifi capable devices.. > > ex. WIN laptop, Playstaion 3... etc... > > > > rum0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu > 2290 > ether 00:1e:e5:a8:bd:5a > media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect mode 11g > status: associated > wlan0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu > 1500 > ether 00:1e:e5:a8:bd:5a > inet 192.168.1.169 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 > media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet OFDM/18Mbps mode 11g > status: associated > ssid vicnet channel 11 (2462 MHz 11g) bssid 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 > country US authmode WPA2/802.11i privacy ON deftxkey UNDEF > AES-CCM 2:128-bit AES-CCM 3:128-bit txpower 0 bmiss 7 > scanvalid 450 > bgscan bgscanintvl 300 bgscanidle 250 roam:rssi 7 roam:rate 5 > protmode CTS roaming MANUAL > > > > Also yesterday, I lost complete connectivity to the router while my > WIN PC was connected and browsing just fine.. > > I had to bounce the interface and reset the default gateway and my > connection restored. > > I did: > > /etc/rc.d/netif restart && /etc/rc.d/routing restart > > > Thanks, > > Justin What version FreeBSD are you using? The only workaround I know is kill wpa_supplicant and run again- been happening to me for ages. But 8.1 it _finally_ sorted it out :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 01:44:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EB8B1065670 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 01:44:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexer@internode.on.net) Received: from mail.internode.on.net (bld-mail13.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC7928FC1B for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 01:44:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from staff-250-70.wireless.adelaide.edu.au (unverified [129.127.250.70]) by mail.internode.on.net (SurgeMail 3.8f2) with ESMTP id 50404251-1927428 for multiple; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 12:14:14 +1030 (CDT) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Indexer In-Reply-To: <4D0A6AC6.4995.44283A1@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 12:14:09 +1030 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20101215120036.DFC371065849@hub.freebsd.org>, <4D095004.5513.2EF1E210@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk>, <4D099A80.6030808@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4D0A6AC6.4995.44283A1@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> To: Dave X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.3.1 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Noob Jail question. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 01:44:17 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 >=20 >=20 > Indexer and Da Rock, many thanks, more reading, and some fiddling = needed=20 > I think. It is the best way to learn. Setup a VM of fbsd 8.1 on your computer, = and just play with it on that with jails, and learn what you can an cant = do. Remember that if you ever need help of course, these email lists are = great. Also, read the FBSD handbook, it has some great instructions Isnt self directed learning great ;) >=20 > Cheers. >=20 > Dave B. >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" William Brown pgp.mit.edu -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJNCsBsAAoJEHF16AnLoz6JG58P/Auqb1g9Id0r+uAIdg7atLf0 +KCaJ78n/2+aYYUAxbjnfAIQrv/qwqvV163EnZCVq4xJSAfUlZWo9fkV55mPN5co d5ZO9s7dr4p57ptv3MuF8+DtG0dPq9KtBPQT1U7m94uzXSDCRtjVJMzg5AqIfRTi +ZO19ewjfMkhvEi0qmk2BoOTc50WGaQSU8A09r8ItquDOAqGYV+a7yPswUhn6Uc8 NCc+m1kDdAyxjLKTMzcP1Lkxh8j/RU8fxpPZQkIc6U/6dF56NGUob+99R6xsUt5P y3LgkMd1R6pOngrid3MXxB7pIlh6Hy/tSICgcpsUPYbXinKlSFrSKlX6PIHRZlj0 vIO89ofHMl2m8T0L52zZcAupcnP43i+cUI7paPBAekbmuV/VhaCOWxCZp97CUVKd 30dgngg0zKBZFPHbCeMZLsNT4gsCRnVEJdUYSnxKMg6tLFwK8uCnXU3wPoQ/Gm0u SVsVQTdHJfkHfjt0oEqZeBEPtTi8Nd5HCn6JAEOpXY6I9d4/4qifSM0goV5uyO0F Xo++r6ej+dN1Mo1/4TR0EomEI20hgASnKit9C2exAx77qqmpMpk95O6EZbvF4Q4U dNR/o72Qq5v7SFLV18DlA5sFUnLk7cZclNsaeNf60ZAzp6iCxrsSoZjmbIkX0qEv W5gn8NQbQqDFVy7XbJyk =3DKnnJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 03:41:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DF6210656A5 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 03:41:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mcquiggi@sfu.ca) Received: from pobox.sfu.ca (pobox.sfu.ca [142.58.101.28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E337E8FC1A for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 03:41:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.101.238] ([74.50.238.226]) (authenticated bits=0) by pobox.sfu.ca (8.13.6/8.13.5/SFU-6.0G) with ESMTP id oBH2NZr3003638 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:23:41 -0800 (PST) From: Kevin McQuiggin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 18:23:35 -0800 Message-Id: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Subject: Can't Build Port - pecl-intl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 03:41:34 -0000 Hi All: I am trying to upgrade my "RoundCube" webmail port, but the build fails = when trying to build the dependency port "pecl-intl": =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D highgate# pwd /usr/ports/devel/pecl-intl highgate# make =3D=3D=3D> pecl-intl-1.1.2_2 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/phpize - = found =3D=3D=3D> pecl-intl-1.1.2_2 depends on file: = /usr/local/bin/autoconf-2.68 - found =3D=3D=3D> pecl-intl-1.1.2_2 depends on shared library: icui18n.46 - = found =3D=3D=3D> PHPizing for pecl-intl-1.1.2_2 Configuring for: PHP Api Version: 20090626 Zend Module Api No: 20090626 Zend Extension Api No: 220090626 Cannot find autoconf. Please check your autoconf installation and the $PHP_AUTOCONF environment variable. Then, rerun this script. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/pecl-intl. =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D The problem seems to be with the make failing to find "autoconf", which = is indeed installed correctly. Note that the preamble indicates = "autoconf-2.68 - found" yet the later step says it cannot be found. Any help would be appreciated. My ports are current, via "portsnap = fetch update" done daily. I am running FreeBSD 6.3. Thanks, Kevin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 03:58:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23CED1065672 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 03:58:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbiquez@intranet.com.mx) Received: from intranet.com.mx (intranet.com.mx [200.33.246.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFBFE8FC0A for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 03:58:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from PC2.intranet.com.mx (189.191.41.102) by intranet.com.mx with ESMTP (EIMS X 3.3.9) for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 22:00:32 -0600 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 21:58:02 -0600 To: FreeBSD From: Jorge Biquez Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed Message-ID: <3375403234-437633920@intranet.com.mx> Subject: Not affecting exactly FreeBSD but OpenBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 03:58:46 -0000 Hello all. I found this interesting and wanted to share it here..... I guess it has to do with a recently thread here.... Jorge Biquez -------------------------- By Doug Barney Editor in Chief, Redmond magazine dbarney@redmondmag.com FBI: THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INSTALLATION If WikiLeaks taught us anything, it's that our government (heck, pretty much all governments) does a lot of things behind our backs. Some of this is necessary and justified, and some seems just stupid and sometimes evil. Now an ex-consultant for the FBI says a decade ago the bureau modified OpenBSD (you can do that since it is open source). It didn't improve security or performance. Nah, the feds installed a backdoor so it could spy on U.S. attorneys who used the OS. http://www.1105newsletters.com/t.do?id=6650088:222349 The charges, made by Greg Perry, were denounced by an OpenBSD developer as poppycock. This is a bit different from WikiLeaks as Perry claims his charges were meant to be private and to serve as notice to get the OpenBSD code fully audited. It will, I think, take an audit to get the bottom of this fiasco. Do you trust our key pieces of software or suspect manipulation? Send your opinions to dbarney@redmondmag.com. We only publish first names so you needn't fear retribution. To comment, go here: http://www.1105newsletters.com/t.do?id=6650089:222349 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 04:09:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38B2C106566C for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 04:09:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACAF38FC08 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 04:09:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.homeip.net (c80-217-64-49.bredband.comhem.se [80.217.64.49]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id oBH49Bah037367; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:09:20 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from bernt@bah.homeip.net) Message-ID: <4D0AE267.2000902@bah.homeip.net> Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:09:11 +0100 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; sv-SE; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101213 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Svein Skogen (Listmail account)" References: <20101216114035.GB9509@michelle1> <4D0A60ED.3020801@bah.homeip.net> <4D0A619E.2000100@stillbilde.net> In-Reply-To: <4D0A619E.2000100@stillbilde.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Spam with fake address from the list? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 04:09:33 -0000 2010-12-16 19:59, Sven Skogen (List mail account): > On 16.12.2010 19:56, Bernt Hansson wrote: >> 2010-12-16 12:40, Michelle Konzack: >>> Hello *, >>> >>> does someone get this kind of spam too? >> >> No, nothing from the ip-range 69.170.128.0/24 is getting thru. > > I actually have a very specific route, just for them, in my border gateway: > > ip route 64.38.11.26 255.255.255.255 Null0 Aha. It's Layered Technologies, Inc. OK we block all ip assigned to them then. > > Let's just say that I have ... views on incurable spammers. So do we. /BAH From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 04:39:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55EEA106564A for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 04:39:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbiquez@intranet.com.mx) Received: from intranet.com.mx (intranet.com.mx [200.33.246.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F10E68FC0A for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 04:39:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from PC2.intranet.com.mx (189.191.41.102) by intranet.com.mx with ESMTP (EIMS X 3.3.9); Thu, 16 Dec 2010 22:41:09 -0600 X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 22:39:11 -0600 To: "Michael R. Rusch" From: Jorge Biquez In-Reply-To: References: <3375403234-437633920@intranet.com.mx> Mime-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <3375405670-437633933@intranet.com.mx> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: Not affecting exactly FreeBSD but OpenBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 04:39:24 -0000 At 10:22 p.m. 16/12/2010, Michael R. Rusch wrote: >On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Jorge Biquez ><jbiquez@intranet.com.mx> wrote: >Hello all. > >I found this interesting and wanted to share it here..... >I guess it has to do with a recently thread here.... > >Jorge Biquez >-------------------------- >By Doug Barney >Editor in Chief, Redmond magazine >dbarney@redmondmag.com > >FBI: THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INSTALLATION >If WikiLeaks taught us anything, it's that our government (heck, pretty >much all governments) does a lot of things behind our backs. Some of >this is necessary and justified, and some seems just stupid and >sometimes evil. > >Now an ex-consultant for the FBI says a decade ago the bureau modified >OpenBSD (you can do that since it is open source). It didn't improve >security or performance. Nah, the feds installed a backdoor so it could >spy on U.S. attorneys who used the OS. >http://www.1105newsletters.com/t.do?id=6650088:222349 > >The charges, made by Greg Perry, were denounced by an OpenBSD developer >as poppycock. > >This is a bit different from WikiLeaks as Perry claims his charges were >meant to be private and to serve as notice to get the OpenBSD code >fully audited. > >It will, I think, take an audit to get the bottom of this fiasco. > >Do you trust our key pieces of software or suspect manipulation? Send >your opinions to >dbarney@redmondmag.com. We only >publish first names so >you needn't fear retribution. > >To comment, go here: >http://www.1105newsletters.com/t.do?id=6650089:222349 > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >To unsubscribe, send any mail to >"freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > > >Jorge: > >I appreciated your willingness to post information about the subject >at hand, however I don't think the mailing list is the correct place >for 'Redmond Magazine' propaganda. > >I would also like to point out as of yet, the existence of a >backdoor has yet to be confirmed. > >Below are two link you may enjoying reading to update your knowledge >of the matter at hand: > >http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=129237675106730&w=2 > >http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.bugtraq/45620 > >Michael > >-- > >Thanks, >Michael Rusch > >New York Times > >ruschm@gmail.com >twitter - @weeddude Hello. I am sorry. I thought could be of interest... I will follow the links. Thanks!. I'm sorry th eintention was not make propaganda to Redmon.... Jorge Biquez From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 04:52:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45723106566C for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 04:52:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ruschm@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f48.google.com (mail-bw0-f48.google.com [209.85.214.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA1558FC0A for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 04:52:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so66117bwz.7 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:52:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=joNsjQyQv0Pd6HjDsml/pmmDd6AV/ou/TBMniJk5XXo=; b=d5/1nAlpzGKf4e05TA+8nwirlgjA+ssnrsVOkyRPsPrRbPfeajnB/kHBb422GHggzB h4qHec53/7/uoG0+8Dg/xMjticqovV7akq+t23HW93/kZa8jTSxUVox5pv8i9xyPkNMh +517XElNTYb4QRZ8z2GE94ukfJ7DuexiT5XUI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=JUiv/kY5KaDWduzzWAjj1/Wo4jN5uFxaSdgvMiLT2/IRzh+ybJlpEeBMCpHFaIBhw0 hSsvAKmuXF32AIVEiMCGtrEzQgxVGMdrskz/tUPIG4hfP2aRvvVorFrRnHw6/HTTkpRL r4gSOe+ALgdJMerRDCasSG29zzaeVfjRiomm8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.75.131 with SMTP id y3mr220355bkj.126.1292559742243; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:22:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.53.66 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 20:22:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <3375403234-437633920@intranet.com.mx> References: <3375403234-437633920@intranet.com.mx> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 22:22:22 -0600 Message-ID: From: "Michael R. Rusch" To: Jorge Biquez Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: dbarney@redmondmag.com, FreeBSD Subject: Re: Not affecting exactly FreeBSD but OpenBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 04:52:02 -0000 On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Jorge Biquez wrote: > Hello all. > > I found this interesting and wanted to share it here..... > I guess it has to do with a recently thread here.... > > Jorge Biquez > -------------------------- > By Doug Barney > Editor in Chief, Redmond magazine > dbarney@redmondmag.com > > FBI: THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INSTALLATION > If WikiLeaks taught us anything, it's that our government (heck, pretty > much all governments) does a lot of things behind our backs. Some of > this is necessary and justified, and some seems just stupid and > sometimes evil. > > Now an ex-consultant for the FBI says a decade ago the bureau modified > OpenBSD (you can do that since it is open source). It didn't improve > security or performance. Nah, the feds installed a backdoor so it could > spy on U.S. attorneys who used the OS. > http://www.1105newsletters.com/t.do?id=6650088:222349 > > The charges, made by Greg Perry, were denounced by an OpenBSD developer > as poppycock. > > This is a bit different from WikiLeaks as Perry claims his charges were > meant to be private and to serve as notice to get the OpenBSD code > fully audited. > > It will, I think, take an audit to get the bottom of this fiasco. > > Do you trust our key pieces of software or suspect manipulation? Send > your opinions to dbarney@redmondmag.com. We only publish first names so > you needn't fear retribution. > > To comment, go here: > http://www.1105newsletters.com/t.do?id=6650089:222349 > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Jorge: I appreciated your willingness to post information about the subject at hand, however I don't think the mailing list is the correct place for 'Redmond Magazine' propaganda. I would also like to point out as of yet, the existence of a backdoor has yet to be confirmed. Below are two link you may enjoying reading to update your knowledge of the matter at hand: http://marc.info/?l=openbsd-tech&m=129237675106730&w=2 http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.security.bugtraq/45620 Michael -- Thanks, Michael Rusch New York Times ruschm@gmail.com twitter - @weeddude From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 05:17:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 128EC10656D2 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:17:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0C5D8FC28 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:17:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PTSh2-0001El-LF for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 06:17:24 +0100 Received: from pool-173-79-85-36.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([173.79.85.36]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 06:17:24 +0100 Received: from nightrecon by pool-173-79-85-36.washdc.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 06:17:24 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Michael Powell Followup-To: gmane.os.freebsd.questions Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 00:18:57 -0500 Lines: 50 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-173-79-85-36.washdc.fios.verizon.net Subject: Re: Can't Build Port - pecl-intl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:17:28 -0000 Kevin McQuiggin wrote: > Hi All: > > I am trying to upgrade my "RoundCube" webmail port, but the build fails > when trying to build the dependency port "pecl-intl": > > ========== > highgate# pwd > /usr/ports/devel/pecl-intl > highgate# make > ===> pecl-intl-1.1.2_2 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/phpize - found > ===> pecl-intl-1.1.2_2 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/autoconf-2.68 - > found > ===> pecl-intl-1.1.2_2 depends on shared library: icui18n.46 - found > ===> PHPizing for pecl-intl-1.1.2_2 > Configuring for: > PHP Api Version: 20090626 > Zend Module Api No: 20090626 > Zend Extension Api No: 220090626 > Cannot find autoconf. Please check your autoconf installation and the > $PHP_AUTOCONF environment variable. Then, rerun this script. > > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/devel/pecl-intl. > ========== > > The problem seems to be with the make failing to find "autoconf", which is > indeed installed correctly. Note that the preamble indicates > "autoconf-2.68 - found" yet the later step says it cannot be found. > > Any help would be appreciated. My ports are current, via "portsnap fetch > update" done daily. I am running FreeBSD 6.3. > This error has been around forever, and just resurfaces periodically. If you just want to get the port built set some environment variables to sidestep it. setenv PHP_AUTOCONF autoconf-2.68 setenv PHP_AUTOHEADER autoheader-2.68 Just had to do this to upgrade xcache. -Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 05:41:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 514AF106566B for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:41:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vic@yeaguy.com) Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com (hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com [71.74.56.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B5FC8FC0C for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:41:25 +0000 (UTC) X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=dquaJDitHqzHCdqWSoZ6IgapSuTzW/4TaRYx9N9k4W8= c=1 sm=0 a=q_9cECTTNvIA:10 a=Q9fys5e9bTEA:10 a=uRK6ZUxDawFwC8+94ldQlg==:17 a=ZaDg5-L3AAAA:8 a=iOhrDboYAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=A7Wvaz8EAAAA:8 a=0nlizQo0W3Gp6Brk18EA:9 a=TXC3OFNVxp9c6Moz6IoA:7 a=mRD79jJv2hM51xLbvHUJ0lHYrTwA:4 a=PUjeQqilurYA:10 a=-_C46MR6lL4A:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=uRK6ZUxDawFwC8+94ldQlg==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 66.27.133.231 Received: from [66.27.133.231] ([66.27.133.231:19224] helo=vic-amd) by hrndva-oedge01.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id 16/51-14011-408FA0D4; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:41:25 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed; delsp=yes To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, "Da Rock" References: <4D0ABF2E.7080900@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 21:41:22 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit From: "justin v" Organization: EndUser_guy Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <4D0ABF2E.7080900@herveybayaustralia.com.au> User-Agent: Opera Mail/10.63 (Win32) Cc: Subject: Re: Wifi keeps dropping.. not sure why, looking for tips/suggestions on debugging this X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:41:26 -0000 On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 17:38:54 -0800, Da Rock wrote: > On 12/17/10 03:46, Justin V. wrote: >> >> >> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010, Mubeesh ali wrote: >> >>> can u completely not send any traffic or is this a random drop. If >>> random there could be interference causing replay counter mismatch. >>> This may force AP to drop the packet, the ap may de authenticate >>> client if it sees continuous stream of such packets in a short >>> interval and force client to drop existing sessions like ftp. >>> >>> Please try changing the channel. If the client and AP are both A >>> capable please try using the A band as there are more non overlapping >>> channels and u may be able to find a channel with low interference. >>> >>> >>> >>> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Justin V. wrote: >>>> >>>> I keep seeing my wlan0 interface go down.. I suspected a faulty wifi >>>> router.. i changed that out.. >>>> >>>> Ive tried using WEP and WPA. Currently using WPA. >>>> >>>> Here are the logs Im seeing.. >>>> >>>> Dec 16 07:47:57 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: CTRL-EVENT-DISCONNECTED - >>>> Disconnect event - remove keys >>>> Dec 16 07:47:57 yeaguy kernel: wlan0: link state changed to DOWN >>>> Dec 16 07:47:57 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-RESULTS >>>> Dec 16 07:47:57 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Trying to associate with >>>> 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 (SSID='vicnet' freq=2462 MHz) >>>> Dec 16 07:48:07 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Authentication with >>>> 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 timed out. >>>> Dec 16 07:48:07 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-RESULTS >>>> Dec 16 07:48:07 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Trying to associate with >>>> 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 (SSID='vicnet' freq=2462 MHz) >>>> Dec 16 07:48:18 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Authentication with >>>> 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 timed out. >>>> Dec 16 07:48:20 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-RESULTS >>>> Dec 16 07:48:20 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Trying to associate with >>>> 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 (SSID='vicnet' freq=2462 MHz) >>>> Dec 16 07:48:20 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: WPA: EAPOL-Key Replay >>>> Counter >>>> did not increase - dropping packet >>>> Dec 16 07:48:20 yeaguy wpa_supplicant[9492]: Associated with >>>> 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 >>>> Dec 16 07:48:20 yeaguy kernel: wlan0: link state changed to UP >>>> >>>> Given the errors seen what would be the best debug to use?? >>>> >>>> wlandebug or tcpdump ?? >>>> >>>> I went ahead and enabled since my logs are complaining about >>>> association and >>>> authentication.. >>>> >>>> yeaguy# wlandebug -i wlan0 auth+assoc >>>> net.wlan.0.debug: 0x0 => 0xc00000 >>>> yeaguy# >>>> >>>> >>>> Any tips would be appreciated.. I have an end user continually >>>> complaining >>>> of disconects over FTP.. >>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> >>>> justin v >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- Best Regards, >>> >>> Mubeesh Ali.V.M >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >> >> >> >> Hi Mubeesh, >> >> It seems to be a random drop.. FTP will be humming along and then wlan0 >> will go down.. >> >> I have the router set for channel 11... >> >> i do not have these types of drops with other wifi capable devices.. >> >> ex. WIN laptop, Playstaion 3... etc... >> >> >> >> rum0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu >> 2290 >> ether 00:1e:e5:a8:bd:5a >> media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect mode 11g >> status: associated >> wlan0: flags=8843 metric 0 mtu >> 1500 >> ether 00:1e:e5:a8:bd:5a >> inet 192.168.1.169 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 >> media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet OFDM/18Mbps mode 11g >> status: associated >> ssid vicnet channel 11 (2462 MHz 11g) bssid 00:22:6b:66:bf:74 >> country US authmode WPA2/802.11i privacy ON deftxkey UNDEF >> AES-CCM 2:128-bit AES-CCM 3:128-bit txpower 0 bmiss 7 scanvalid >> 450 >> bgscan bgscanintvl 300 bgscanidle 250 roam:rssi 7 roam:rate 5 >> protmode CTS roaming MANUAL >> >> >> >> Also yesterday, I lost complete connectivity to the router while my WIN >> PC was connected and browsing just fine.. >> >> I had to bounce the interface and reset the default gateway and my >> connection restored. >> >> I did: >> >> /etc/rc.d/netif restart && /etc/rc.d/routing restart >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Justin > What version FreeBSD are you using? The only workaround I know is kill > wpa_supplicant and run again- been happening to me for ages. But 8.1 it > _finally_ sorted it out :) > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Using Opera's revolutionary email client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ wifi is bugging out on this server. unable to serve. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 08:28:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6334A106564A for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:28:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fullblaststorm@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vw0-f54.google.com (mail-vw0-f54.google.com [209.85.212.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 173A98FC15 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:28:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by vws9 with SMTP id 9so131458vws.13 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 00:28:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=6dwFnJUd9nGecm6qbHE1wgV9x41SDfzkmZbCbXfXpLg=; b=uoKlb6a3r07jKBKLt26uknfeDJY4VGPV3ul0/S96MsLBORxU5866kMWkBX+5z/c4V+ OtT/Q4ms3lXlc3e53+O4ZyY6tNWpvmblDBXpN3R/DCpOlMrhe3mLlm4HeQ7wxGjIOayb ZIg8ZS4Yhwc53LMxwikra/cl6MXqFCLHHKPkk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=TR/nyOs3MMFutoPhTBkgAmsjHxElUhnLpn4ICZaxplfRr9cvZTMkmQgPoWfSHvOrEt 94ZJCxEsfzXcTvW6wCDR6E98yJLv5s7DNa+eeyFHqv1w63YdyKB+6EWbY7qbA0LLWOPB k2wDS8S4MxLhjLMA8zJ3+ZUkYWXzoL5z2gF9U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.90.6 with SMTP id g6mr149210vcm.109.1292574517860; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 00:28:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.220.195.72 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 00:28:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:28:37 +0600 Message-ID: From: Victor Lyapunov To: security-officer@FreeBSD.org, FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Subject: FreeBSD IPSec stack contains backdoors? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:28:40 -0000 ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Victor Lyapunov Date: 2010/12/15 Subject: FreeBSD IPSec stack contains backdoors? To: FreeBSD Mailing List Hi folks, Recently OpenBSD developer Gregory Perry disclosed information about possible backdoors in OpenBSD IPSec stack (see http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.tech/22557) In particular, Gregory Perry, who has been working on a OpenBSD -ish implementation of IPSec says a number of backdoors have been introduced into the code. As far as I am aware, FreeBSD contains considerable amount of code ported from OpenBSD. The question is: was the FreeBSD's ipsec code ported from OpenBSD's implementation? If so, what might be the impact of this? Thanks, Victor Lyapunov. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 09:31:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE7681065672 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:31:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 358B08FC1A for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:31:44 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Status: No X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-2.9, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00, BAYES_00 -1.90) X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-ID: oBH9VRJ7005156 Received: from gkeramidas-glaptop.linux.gr ([74.125.57.36]) (authenticated bits=0) by igloo.linux.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id oBH9VRJ7005156 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:31:33 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Victor Lyapunov References: Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:31:26 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Victor Lyapunov's message of "Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:28:37 +0600") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: security-officer@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: FreeBSD IPSec stack contains backdoors? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 09:31:45 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain The FreeBSD security officer team has already written an official response about this. Please have a look at: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2010-December/005746.html Regards, Giorgos On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:28:37 +0600, Victor Lyapunov wrote: > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: Victor Lyapunov > Date: 2010/12/15 > Subject: FreeBSD IPSec stack contains backdoors? > To: FreeBSD Mailing List > > Hi folks, > Recently OpenBSD developer Gregory Perry disclosed information about > possible backdoors in OpenBSD IPSec stack (see > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.tech/22557) In particular, > Gregory Perry, who has been working on a OpenBSD -ish implementation > of IPSec says a number of backdoors have been introduced into the > code. > > As far as I am aware, FreeBSD contains considerable amount of code > ported from OpenBSD. The question is: was the FreeBSD's ipsec code > ported from OpenBSD's implementation? If so, what might be the impact > of this? > > Thanks, > Victor Lyapunov. --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk0LLe8ACgkQ1g+UGjGGA7agNwCgmK3V+74BIO6gqwspzxepbh+O flsAnjVuyTdMtcPkDrZkxW1LICYz7JKP =xvmn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 11:17:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60FAC106566B for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:17:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from b.smeelen@ose.nl) Received: from mail.ose.nl (mail.ose.nl [212.178.134.164]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEE3C8FC19 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:17:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.ose.nl; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 12:07:45 +0100 Message-ID: <4D0B4480.6010304@ose.nl> Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 12:07:44 +0100 From: Bas Smeelen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101208 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: =?windows-1252?Q?Matej_=8Aerc?= References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE amd64 hangs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:17:51 -0000 On 12/16/2010 06=3A42 PM=2C Matej =8Aerc wrote=3A =3E Hi=2C =3E =3E I am experiencing a strange issue that has never occurred to me in all= the =3E years of using different versions of FreeBSD=2E Maybe you are experiencing this=3A http=3A//security=2Efreebsd=2Eorg/advisories/FreeBSD-EN-10=3A02=2Esched=5Fu= le=2Easc I=27m not sure however if there would be replies to pings then =3E One of our servers=2C which was running without any issues until yester= day=2C =3E stopped responding for two times now - yesterday and today=2E About thr= ee days =3E ago another process of pulling out SNMP data from devices was added=2C= but I =3E was looking the system load and the system was working normally and als= o =3E processes were cmpleting successfully within the timeframe of 5 minutes= =3E =28much faster=2C they completed in about 2 minutes=29=2E I also want t= o mention =3E that those SNMP pulling processes were already working about a month or= so =3E on the same server =28no hardware was changed in the meantime=29 and I= am pretty =3E sure that it should work normally as it did=2E =3E =3E My main problem is=2C that there is abcolutely nothing in log files - n= o =3E errors=2C no warnings=2C nothing=2E No strange messages=2C every proces= s just stops =3E logging at one time and then continues after the reboot=2E Another inte= resting =3E issue is that both hangs occured at approximately the same time=2C but= there =3E was nobody in the server room and also no one was logged into the serve= r at =3E that time except me=2E About 10 minutes before hang I was investigating= =3E processes and everything was very normal - no large CPU eating or memor= y =3E eating processes=2E This might be interesting=2C even after every proce= ss stops =3E responding=2C I was still able to ping the network interfaces and recei= ve ICMP =3E replies back=2E =3E =3E Of course my idea about it is that it must be connected to some hardwar= e =3E problems - my suggestion was to make some memory tests=2E But I would l= ike to =3E hear some your oppinions about the entire situation=2E Could some power= supply =3E issues be doing it=3F The server is about a year old and has=2C as I al= ready =3E mentioned=2C worked like a charm until now=2E How come there is no kern= el panic =3E since no daemon seems to be working=3F Why is network interface still u= p and =3E working=3F =3E =3E I was unable to go to the co-location facility so I can=27t say what wa= s on =3E the screen at both times=2C but I suppose there was nothing else than m= essages =3E I can read from log files=2E =3E =3E I know that 7=2E2 is pretty old version=2C but it was working until now= on the =3E same hardware and we had no reason to change that=2E Now the system is= after =3E reboot again running smoothly and without any issues at all=2E =3E =3E Thank you very much for any information regarding the issue=2E =3E =3E BR=2C Matej =3E --=20 DISCLAIMER=3A This e-mail is for the intended recipient=28s=29 only=2E Acce= ss=2C disclosure=2C copying=2C distribution or reliance on any of it by anyone else is prohibited=2E If yo= u have received it by mistake please let us know by reply and then delete it from your system= =2E From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 11:44:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C704106564A for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:44:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from zhangyuan5558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pw0-f54.google.com (mail-pw0-f54.google.com [209.85.160.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20DFA8FC15 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:44:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pwi10 with SMTP id 10so114624pwi.13 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 03:44:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=qn+k75PCsYeqxrxBAgXxGuSxZqZExhsL4CJauqU37fU=; b=qmGc4VfQiBeEVLXKVXrnWD3Ltcunksn3eGC+RbhSCx2VhBoKybrC3IRRKCPfLeaAgy UBgDwepgPvYwhgMWgHfgRBYJAjyGMlDjhVGXXwUEa6U4yQU6de8+WWjtay02WCF9MiZK XgTvGHZN7b1QC4VuLOOrDKeOh32eyVPeGCglo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=pqMtspdxmv2ZYHQmYmZDQp2qRCjOOXHXAmI/xqlA2zGrpXem2qH44B8alrDfi5TPPO yA+tSdW6ToEi229Hb1h/gw1vOxTefd32evGaoRNlcN1J3pBPkFWxAuBnJAn2V8Chi+K6 T/bXn+bPzkms2R9bB2LBDhpuOwUQtZNPdvui4= Received: by 10.142.44.12 with SMTP id r12mr576961wfr.324.1292586275687; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 03:44:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.100] ([120.39.146.16]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x35sm265438wfd.1.2010.12.17.03.44.31 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 17 Dec 2010 03:44:34 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D0B4D1D.8010700@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:44:29 +0800 From: zY User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; zh-CN; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GB2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 12:01:32 +0000 Cc: Subject: SEBSD is dead? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:44:36 -0000 guys, I have a question. SEBSD is dead? Please tell me its latestprogress. Thanks. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 12:42:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7A27106566B for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 12:42:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xnctsuper@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f51.google.com (mail-ew0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BDE98FC12 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 12:42:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so292627ewy.10 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 04:42:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Q0dBNFv2a/FXXEjg7b/oIq7dBfUNxGNfQi8twrIubsU=; b=kT9yTSt8ojkKPHjLgWqcBtOWNZcrnNHLMqnuE9jWWbF1fgh6nSzgXx4+YBBK/yNiGf 4MwGaO1Lvt0YE8miDL0+8E8wq7Jo+vYecszFCtsLc2gxfh1111XIVhKIQdxYDzvgjj7V jcYtOC1CLV39i+UU+PBRm6K5ZmPIrrD1Oni0Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=wNWCEL4amB642VDK/7/J9klYp9UlrkMJN0xpf6GbYnsQtcvU3jOIJQEJPI0w8bPLgo 68BQ2geOZLqvMl97l5GlAbfgVwY/6+QUgpwxa8l9leT3NV+T9WtwQtYhZMW+l5Vdlyo0 Qt7Isvs4ALfTvAOCp9CmXxD8+2f/NoXW69yZk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.22.8 with SMTP id s8mr532324ees.17.1292588441826; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 04:20:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.53.79 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 04:20:41 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:20:41 +0200 Message-ID: From: super super To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: What is the value of kernel "cpu" option for Core 2 Duo E8400 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 12:42:39 -0000 Hi, Freebsd-questions. What is the value of kernel "cpu" option for Core 2 Duo E8400 need to specify the architecture to amd64. -- Best regards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 13:01:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1233) id B520D1065670; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:01:33 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:01:33 +0000 From: Alexander Best To: super super Message-ID: <20101217130133.GA1155@freebsd.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What is the value of kernel "cpu" option for Core 2 Duo E8400 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:01:33 -0000 On Fri Dec 17 10, super super wrote: > Hi, Freebsd-questions. > > What is the value of kernel "cpu" option for Core 2 Duo E8400 need to > specify the architecture to amd64. cpu HAMMER ... and adding CPUTYPE ?= nocona to your /etc/make.conf will make sure world gets optimised for your cpu. cheers. alex > -- > Best regards -- a13x From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 13:03:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 487041065674 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:03:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2FBE8FC13 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:03:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk36 with SMTP id 36so644074qyk.13 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:03:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=b0o2+HakRdOJWrqU5QXhosHKvtofrrEMeL28TTtopkU=; b=AQewwhmY3Qs3J5N4ZHWjAdVSMiOrh09YU/Z/8bMmC3pSCWtyTeKe6p+B6WsauFuxzQ yPtrk7cyMOlUacdNiWVeafsSXi1aKRNyH8IBsEb41lBOqnQuzgs18p7JPh+3WqE8UfR8 rUp4K5SmFoHvUOgqtCRSkwdgSO1dx/blIBFjs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=RS1+mxVG/ADdOXwgUDtIndEbRAdk6NhOUsUA4S3fc/J1CtWUXct8R6ngVZ0oU+qGr/ eDMoiMQlrIqlWQ7COAfdvCCGzxOr7gnvB/TRwVcSeuFmwTnDb++E6hNc1gJtk+f4CuPx O4wWz9x0B494VUwhcd2SkJ3aT7FnbiIkjm4xE= Received: by 10.229.2.164 with SMTP id 36mr719331qcj.289.1292591004136; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:03:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.88.9 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:02:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D0B4D1D.8010700@gmail.com> References: <4D0B4D1D.8010700@gmail.com> From: Odhiambo Washington Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:02:54 +0300 Message-ID: To: zY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SEBSD is dead? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:03:25 -0000 2010/12/17 zY > guys, I have a question. SEBSD is dead? Please tell me its latestprogress. > Thanks. > > What is it? A FreeBSD port? Here we discuss FreeBSD, unless you are porting something from somewhere:) -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Damn!! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 13:14:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3B04106566C for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:14:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from outbackdingo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ew0-f51.google.com (mail-ew0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73E2E8FC13 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:14:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so306109ewy.10 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:14:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=7trSIbL2pGDSuCrtfBCE+34SKfz/LmHbIjxGXn20+i0=; b=WCh/MwibYjiFctwM095IPerGxav+WSby3Y2ejMP+0R2N0ofvUZxQu07VswmldM6oMl ttpTRn0uBxRNf2La9sv4YqOfntoPb/2S/Vptu31opGxinFhaYMlCMhJoPH8s6JhHlzfx ip6+VIm3qsVz5DD3Xl7tsSzUfD2V0gQA+WcGg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=cUZxIEKnh2eOUeShl+q+YOtapy2zjgWFn1nVqYpTQjvWPmF1WpYWgoMbkdW/CDE8el sN4Eh4Z1p2byeLhrectz42fER/sLMZrp6+rBLEJ5XTz1qdfYmx1cxbNakG0eC+KOb+IU 2COG3RLzHnMKwGgGhLKUGJg8GON10mRB+On9w= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.121.8 with SMTP id q8mr558745eeh.24.1292591662607; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:14:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.48.75 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:14:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4D0B4D1D.8010700@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:14:22 -0500 Message-ID: From: Outback Dingo To: Odhiambo Washington Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: zY , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SEBSD is dead? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:14:24 -0000 SeBSD is a FreeBSD project for security enhancement... ACLs and stuff... its part of FreeBSD On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > 2010/12/17 zY > > > guys, I have a question. SEBSD is dead? Please tell me its > latestprogress. > > Thanks. > > > > > What is it? A FreeBSD port? > Here we discuss FreeBSD, unless you are porting something from somewhere:) > > > -- > Best regards, > Odhiambo WASHINGTON, > Nairobi,KE > +254733744121/+254722743223 > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > Damn!! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 13:17:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35189106564A for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:17:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd4michelle@tamay-dogan.net) Received: from mail.tamay-dogan.net (mail.tamay-dogan.net [88.168.69.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACFCC8FC13 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:17:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from michelle1.private.tamay-dogan.net (router.private.tamay-dogan.net [::ffff:192.168.0.65]) (AUTH: LOGIN michelle.konzack) by mail.tamay-dogan.net with esmtp; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:16:55 +0100 id 000B024C.4D0B62C7.00001A4A Received: by michelle1.private.tamay-dogan.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:16:55 +0100 Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:16:55 +0100 From: Michelle Konzack To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101217131655.GH4543@michelle1> References: <4D0B4D1D.8010700@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=_samba3-6730-1292591816-0001-2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D0B4D1D.8010700@gmail.com> X-Message-Flag: Improper configuration of Outlook is a breeding ground for viruses. Please take care your Client is configured correctly. Greetings Michelle. X-Disclaimer-DE: Eine weitere Verwendung oder die Veroeffentlichung dieser Mail oder dieser Mailadresse ist nur mit der Einwilligung des Autors gestattet. X-Disclaimer-EN: What are you looking here? X-Disclaimer-FR: Quest ce tu regarder ici? Organization: Tamay Dogan Network X-Operating-System: Linux michelle1 2.6.26-2-686 X-Homepage: http://www.itsystems.tamay-dogan.net/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: SEBSD is dead? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:17:04 -0000 This is a MIME-formatted message. If you see this text it means that your E-mail software does not support MIME-formatted messages. --=_samba3-6730-1292591816-0001-2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello zY, Am 2010-12-17 19:44:29, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: > guys, I have a question. SEBSD is dead? Please tell me its > latestprogress. Thanks. SEBSD? Do you mean "Security Enhanced BSD"? Something like OpenBSD and NETSEC? LOL Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening Michelle Konzack --=20 ##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant ###################### Development of Intranet and Embedded Systems with Debian GNU/Linux itsystems@tdnet France EURL itsystems@tdnet UG (limited liability) Owner Michelle Konzack Owner Michelle Konzack Apt. 917 (homeoffice) 50, rue de Soultz Kinzigstra=DFe 17 67100 Strasbourg/France 77694 Kehl/Germany Tel: +33-6-61925193 mobil Tel: +49-177-9351947 mobil Tel: +33-9-52705884 fix Jabber linux4michelle@jabber.ccc.de ICQ #328449886 Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ --=_samba3-6730-1292591816-0001-2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.pgp" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Description: Digital signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFNC2LHC0FPBMSS+BIRAv40AJ9qYrmxu398DSPu39FPpxZaOevJ8QCgyQZc l/9sMved0NR+KQTrHzMm5tI= =/ia+ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=_samba3-6730-1292591816-0001-2-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 13:23:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9037106566B for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:23:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45EEC8FC16 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:23:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 674C0E61DE; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:23:45 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from :to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=46Z/r3WRx0CA 7mkvGDaEMJyo/EY=; b=zSfXJDydBr2WKmCTEz6R0AHfL3XUS8DbxH+DhrHctm/X T3+Ce0vXAAmcLdbQ03eFI0WK8PqjtIcbXQYiXsfBKsbSOSEhVW4ynKA+UOXltEZI QP8zqHzyG8NMeSvK7dJSxkQ9lt+yU58ooRGJlylj4PTicdQ+2bq5KVKdv4Ecxko= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from:to :cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=DFJbh3 urWbdWMnWAyd/2qn6En3DdwN3c68dsrOtihtAFN6k43msvUs3Tt9Z+lw6tY6UG0A /b7VDIZ9ITtvEBQX8+xQnmxV4E4A/u2+xEOG5MMISRHpRGYQs8S2jA6c9vfA59gO MEmLFP7dTStEqXiyt3qP9hztjJoGbevPY4D0w= Received: from unknown (client-86-29-47-22.glfd.adsl.virginmedia.com [86.29.47.22]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 116C6E60D1; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:23:45 +0000 (GMT) Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:23:41 +0000 From: Bruce Cran To: Outback Dingo Message-ID: <20101217132341.00005099@unknown> In-Reply-To: References: <4D0B4D1D.8010700@gmail.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.16.0; i586-pc-mingw32msvc) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Odhiambo Washington , zY , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SEBSD is dead? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:23:46 -0000 On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:14:22 -0500 Outback Dingo wrote: > SeBSD is a FreeBSD project for security enhancement... ACLs and > stuff... its part of FreeBSD SEBSD, the MAC framework (http://www.trustedbsd.org/sebsd.html), was integrated into FreeBSD in 5.x (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/mac.html). Other projects from TrustedBSD such as OpenBSM continue to be integrated as they reach completion. http://www.trustedbsd.org/news.html has details on the current projects. -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 13:27:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C85B1065697 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:27:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B233D8FC13 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:27:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so592581wyf.13 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:27:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=TEofpH7dqotBYgHS/grmARYeeGRycpizkR6dr6s/ma4=; b=G0KcsjmeYZ/SnxB0Gu+gzGBVrDaia0oV+m0Y1r5IdfbiIZRUfWpavdMlGmzzVKTkQR 8DLuPR3bYy35gOSRHjquOjzO6wKnkQJWQVxIoWAxIvnDEoTvmeEAQ1iwZzeZ7RRQ7Q72 HiVuE0Q+H0pnK7n0LDX3H85a+aHO9SxRbxRt0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=hJ+Wz0i9FQmrx9OTAiJ2VHqDl2erAYAY2LW0CMTw9GFBbaAMZHbYt5ZHWqxFmCdjBU Ts/FUOVwl9s23pxwOFV7Ot8Db0Thsz0Njp2RJvMy84Lms8BE0YJ6ibHp8OtyPuKD2XAb SCwZjDM1W6cb78nUADUg3Tbl6hP7uY8xElW+8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.46.19 with SMTP id q19mr757032web.0.1292592467745; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:27:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.72.198 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:27:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101217131655.GH4543@michelle1> References: <4D0B4D1D.8010700@gmail.com> <20101217131655.GH4543@michelle1> Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:27:47 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: Michelle Konzack Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SEBSD is dead? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:27:49 -0000 On 17 December 2010 13:16, Michelle Konzack w= rote: > Hello zY, > > Am 2010-12-17 19:44:29, hacktest Du folgendes herunter: > > guys, I have a question. SEBSD is dead? Please tell me its > > latestprogress. Thanks. > > SEBSD? Do you mean "Security Enhanced BSD"? > > Something like OpenBSD and NETSEC? LOL > > Thanks, Greetings and nice Day/Evening > Michelle Konzack > > -- > ##################### Debian GNU/Linux Consultant ###################### > Development of Intranet and Embedded Systems with Debian GNU/Linux > > itsystems@tdnet France EURL itsystems@tdnet UG (limited liability) > Owner Michelle Konzack Owner Michelle Konzack > > Apt. 917 (homeoffice) > 50, rue de Soultz Kinzigstra=DFe 17 > 67100 Strasbourg/France 77694 Kehl/Germany > Tel: +33-6-61925193 mobil Tel: +49-177-9351947 mobil > Tel: +33-9-52705884 fix > > > > > Jabber linux4michelle@jabber.ccc.de > ICQ #328449886 > > Linux-User #280138 with the Linux Counter, http://counter.li.org/ > I was under the impression most of the stuff from trusted bsd was merged into freebsd ages ago, as the trustedBSD project had accomplished its goals= . http://www.trustedbsd.org/sebsd.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 13:34:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2EF7106566B for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:34:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from artifexor@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 797C98FC1D for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:34:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk36 with SMTP id 36so676012qyk.13 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:34:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=7Q+YWsMnvLnq+NpueKohLqBKJiEaU+3PYsatkAdjguw=; b=SVbLQR9ftMpOZTzgYcs+U7kK7EtHyz17763k9f09v+AgtcW8I/Igg0s94Y+fBuFvsk mLe/KNYnL+C1DgOabwd+xVze8N8INcMcN+Z8uxRYfpUJ/BF+H4BUVl8XP4/WClbJ+Z6X iXogOLa6VQ9b7JIxwgDgP7ZKbWneG5vDhquIQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=r4Nn7cSH/S2W2vyeuN47cipV6C8u7Xsvd1CIbvUKfN+UZSSRRl0oh0dGrpdqnTcC+H zVusU18UGk/zHpN4G8+jckMJ61/FSzbBjrui3xljZuZerB/he1Apmqevlu6LKdeyomMK JxX4kRVgQmKhmlvuqk4UQuqI/EJU/P13djm9I= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.81.206 with SMTP id y14mr801658qck.127.1292591242149; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:07:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.190.193 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:07:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4D0B4D1D.8010700@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:07:22 +0100 Message-ID: From: Artifex Maximus To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: SEBSD is dead? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:34:59 -0000 On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 2:02 PM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > 2010/12/17 zY > >> guys, I have a question. SEBSD is dead? Please tell me its latestprogress. >> Thanks. >> >> > What is it? A FreeBSD port? > Here we discuss FreeBSD, unless you are porting something from somewhere:) Security Enhanced BSD http://www.trustedbsd.org/sebsd.html Bye, a From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 13:47:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD53B106564A for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:47:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57D478FC1B for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:47:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so609858wwf.31 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:47:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=YmbGOW502vWrHSODxwC7o4WEwyZVZ6kp/YubFORlBy8=; b=G83OQHO8X33bu9ceVSVaJi6aQGslV7XlOdk/o8PtOsL5m6F+qMHz81A6CSitljg5Dg 5H1pyfDU/XDS4GCPkRvv8WBe1+KhC8oUj/8tpMQ+xOfbiOsQS1wRFYwkEVVlnrDopsVa LckydC1PvR1C3NkYrXqZ9uH4UJs2PdwerND5s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=IawKBue7NBGdF9tmACOkxF3xIKWoAKtF1oNShyB4u5eAkodtx24rtatglANsqm7TsG CU50qnA42jDYnCU9pLDLa7omqJT+LQc7bTEDruaIV2zAuxaDWhHJx2j+94i4fQsp1+If OvSW1aezhhhgGBDfLfxWuP7njzcSaig3/73Qs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.51.135 with SMTP id b7mr3893102wec.29.1292593643005; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:47:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.72.198 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:47:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:47:22 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: =?UTF-8?Q?Matej_=C5=A0erc?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE amd64 hangs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:47:25 -0000 On 16 December 2010 17:42, Matej =C5=A0erc wrote: > Hi, > > I am experiencing a strange issue that has never occurred to me in all th= e > years of using different versions of FreeBSD. > > One of our servers, which was running without any issues until yesterday, > stopped responding for two times now - yesterday and today. About three > days > ago another process of pulling out SNMP data from devices was added, but = I > was looking the system load and the system was working normally and also > processes were cmpleting successfully within the timeframe of 5 minutes > (much faster, they completed in about 2 minutes). I also want to mention > that those SNMP pulling processes were already working about a month or s= o > on the same server (no hardware was changed in the meantime) and I am > pretty > sure that it should work normally as it did. > > My main problem is, that there is abcolutely nothing in log files - no > errors, no warnings, nothing. No strange messages, every process just sto= ps > logging at one time and then continues after the reboot. Another > interesting > issue is that both hangs occured at approximately the same time, but ther= e > was nobody in the server room and also no one was logged into the server = at > that time except me. About 10 minutes before hang I was investigating > processes and everything was very normal - no large CPU eating or memory > eating processes. This might be interesting, even after every process sto= ps > responding, I was still able to ping the network interfaces and receive > ICMP > replies back. > > Of course my idea about it is that it must be connected to some hardware > problems - my suggestion was to make some memory tests. But I would like = to > hear some your oppinions about the entire situation. Could some power > supply > issues be doing it? The server is about a year old and has, as I already > mentioned, worked like a charm until now. How come there is no kernel pan= ic > since no daemon seems to be working? Why is network interface still up an= d > working? > > I was unable to go to the co-location facility so I can't say what was on > the screen at both times, but I suppose there was nothing else than > messages > I can read from log files. > > I know that 7.2 is pretty old version, but it was working until now on th= e > same hardware and we had no reason to change that. Now the system is afte= r > reboot again running smoothly and without any issues at all. > > Thank you very much for any information regarding the issue. > > BR, Matej > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > I'm not a huge fan of letting snmp spawn heavy weight scripts and processes as it is to easy for a remote machine to effectively dos the machine. I realise you are fairly sure the scripts arent an issue, but try croning the= m every 5 minutes, and writing the results to a file. SNMP can then simply retrieve the results from the file. This safeguard to to a certain extent, in that it stops many processes being spawned. All you have to watch after that is the job run time From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 13:48:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 331F7106566B for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:48:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B21448FC17 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:48:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so612193wyf.13 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:48:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=p5LqYHs3Xrww1b3JKe+bzirtQuOCcmvtkIpGlRMLZYg=; b=Rb+9omrnM0Sj3rrO52LrUMu53xyVfT++NKItHvAO7GK+AR6DrA1vQiEFRFGZ1OA9iR a0pstJHtmgzGQdTZDU5Y0DdXfIG7wWplp/76pqsBTxopDBMdbhWda8pxLyu+Lrg2n0lj q5n0Ys2NEE2KkQC16ICSadIxWa7IX8Jp4dODU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=M3FbgNzYkTvnegbUyH/gVwslisT/LgFH/xhadkhXS2hY/SPdsIlP7gw2wdONnZMWKe Ff9GyjMO/vKMJ9svpn7Xhmg18YLR8SoTzCbUFeCLG8O6np6jt6hG0ZUR7esoay3Cdal9 YpBzjPfm9Ei4PEEfZtO7V5nXEN3vuTHhD9lbE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.188.141 with SMTP id a13mr1118921wen.59.1292593716665; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:48:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.72.198 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 05:48:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:48:36 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: =?UTF-8?Q?Matej_=C5=A0erc?= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE amd64 hangs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:48:38 -0000 On 17 December 2010 13:47, krad wrote: > > > On 16 December 2010 17:42, Matej =C5=A0erc wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I am experiencing a strange issue that has never occurred to me in all t= he >> years of using different versions of FreeBSD. >> >> One of our servers, which was running without any issues until yesterday= , >> stopped responding for two times now - yesterday and today. About three >> days >> ago another process of pulling out SNMP data from devices was added, but= I >> was looking the system load and the system was working normally and also >> processes were cmpleting successfully within the timeframe of 5 minutes >> (much faster, they completed in about 2 minutes). I also want to mention >> that those SNMP pulling processes were already working about a month or = so >> on the same server (no hardware was changed in the meantime) and I am >> pretty >> sure that it should work normally as it did. >> >> My main problem is, that there is abcolutely nothing in log files - no >> errors, no warnings, nothing. No strange messages, every process just >> stops >> logging at one time and then continues after the reboot. Another >> interesting >> issue is that both hangs occured at approximately the same time, but the= re >> was nobody in the server room and also no one was logged into the server >> at >> that time except me. About 10 minutes before hang I was investigating >> processes and everything was very normal - no large CPU eating or memory >> eating processes. This might be interesting, even after every process >> stops >> responding, I was still able to ping the network interfaces and receive >> ICMP >> replies back. >> >> Of course my idea about it is that it must be connected to some hardware >> problems - my suggestion was to make some memory tests. But I would like >> to >> hear some your oppinions about the entire situation. Could some power >> supply >> issues be doing it? The server is about a year old and has, as I already >> mentioned, worked like a charm until now. How come there is no kernel >> panic >> since no daemon seems to be working? Why is network interface still up a= nd >> working? >> >> I was unable to go to the co-location facility so I can't say what was o= n >> the screen at both times, but I suppose there was nothing else than >> messages >> I can read from log files. >> >> I know that 7.2 is pretty old version, but it was working until now on t= he >> same hardware and we had no reason to change that. Now the system is aft= er >> reboot again running smoothly and without any issues at all. >> >> Thank you very much for any information regarding the issue. >> >> BR, Matej >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > I'm not a huge fan of letting snmp spawn heavy weight scripts and process= es > as it is to easy for a remote machine to effectively dos the machine. I > realise you are fairly sure the scripts arent an issue, but try croning t= hem > every 5 minutes, and writing the results to a file. SNMP can then simply > retrieve the results from the file. This safeguard to to a certain extent= , > in that it stops many processes being spawned. All you have to watch afte= r > that is the job run time > > > Also lets stops resources being tied up on the monitoring machine, as it doent have to hang around for x minutes for the results for its query From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 15:30:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62586106566C for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:30:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FD548FC17 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:30:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id oBHFRACC094857; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:27:10 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id oBHFRABe094856; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:27:10 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:27:10 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Outback Dingo Message-ID: <20101217152709.GE94554@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <4D0B4D1D.8010700@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Odhiambo Washington , zY , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SEBSD is dead? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:30:14 -0000 On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 08:14:22AM -0500, Outback Dingo wrote: > SeBSD is a FreeBSD project for security enhancement... ACLs and stuff... its > part of FreeBSD Something like SeLinux those other guys use??? ////jerry > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > > > 2010/12/17 zY > > > > > guys, I have a question. SEBSD is dead? Please tell me its > > latestprogress. > > > Thanks. > > > > > > > > What is it? A FreeBSD port? > > Here we discuss FreeBSD, unless you are porting something from somewhere:) > > > > > > -- > > Best regards, > > Odhiambo WASHINGTON, > > Nairobi,KE > > +254733744121/+254722743223 > > _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > > Damn!! > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 15:42:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60656106566B for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:42:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vince@unsane.co.uk) Received: from unsane.co.uk (unsane-pt.tunnel.tserv5.lon1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f08:110::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5DCD8FC0C for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:42:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vhoffman-macbooklocal.local (lon.namesco.net [195.7.254.102]) (authenticated bits=0) by unsane.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBHFgjUH059313 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:42:46 GMT (envelope-from vince@unsane.co.uk) Message-ID: <4D0B84F5.4010905@unsane.co.uk> Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:42:45 +0000 From: Vincent Hoffman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4D0B4D1D.8010700@gmail.com> <20101217152709.GE94554@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> In-Reply-To: <20101217152709.GE94554@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: SEBSD is dead? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:42:48 -0000 On 17/12/2010 15:27, Jerry McAllister wrote: > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 08:14:22AM -0500, Outback Dingo wrote: > >> SeBSD is a FreeBSD project for security enhancement... ACLs and stuff... its >> part of FreeBSD > Something like SeLinux those other guys use??? Good job that wasnt FBI sponsored, those NSA guys are far more trustworthy ;) > ////jerry > > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: >> >>> 2010/12/17 zY >>> >>>> guys, I have a question. SEBSD is dead? Please tell me its >>> latestprogress. >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> >>> What is it? A FreeBSD port? >>> Here we discuss FreeBSD, unless you are porting something from somewhere:) >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best regards, >>> Odhiambo WASHINGTON, >>> Nairobi,KE >>> +254733744121/+254722743223 >>> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ >>> Damn!! >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >>> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 16:01:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09A6A106564A; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:01:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jackoroses@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6787A8FC1A; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:01:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so735183wwf.31 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:01:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:reply-to :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=02YGjT0KquO+vxAmbwj/CHftGDBSL8gpqAN4Fu8xbzY=; b=qpqAm7QnCTzTlucCoCKL74kMtjqFWxSa09uPRRphIbxVUFXkTPvcAQJY02wzs59rsl 0hCim0W8m3QqFvimsszv0BoxIbwVKx8POnO1ktRkEou4TPwgsuoz8TvziNrueCXW2K9e z27M5Ge+F2vZC9XMpOEtnbEe3t6q/+ZTJ7EZM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; b=N5p6JwyRDKWnOh4kGSUIvZfTUR/JsoZsZpmY9VEz+b2bV3xTRMMP1nv+DmjACIfS/7 B1erLoaZDK1jRCK0bNYiDQZ1l1uychksJOIGCEfewl4YgI6IWCqyXLIOuE+8dWvT60/5 yhStOed8mSkakEKy851OdxECAXIYED0kH0ZrQ= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.133.2 with SMTP id d2mr626677wbt.91.1292600199833; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:36:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.227.132.138 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 07:36:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:36:39 -0500 Message-ID: From: Mike L To: security-officer@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Re: FreeBSD IPSec stack contains backdoors? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jackoroses@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:01:57 -0000 Reads like an unacceptable response to an issue that seems quite critical. On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 4:31 AM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > The FreeBSD security officer team has already written an official > response about this. Please have a look at: > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2010-December/005746.html > > Regards, > Giorgos > > On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:28:37 +0600, Victor Lyapunov < > fullblaststorm@gmail.com> wrote: > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > From: Victor Lyapunov > > Date: 2010/12/15 > > Subject: FreeBSD IPSec stack contains backdoors? > > To: FreeBSD Mailing List > > > > Hi folks, > > Recently OpenBSD developer Gregory Perry disclosed information about > > possible backdoors in OpenBSD IPSec stack (see > > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.tech/22557) In particular, > > Gregory Perry, who has been working on a OpenBSD -ish implementation > > of IPSec says a number of backdoors have been introduced into the > > code. > > > > As far as I am aware, FreeBSD contains considerable amount of code > > ported from OpenBSD. The question is: was the FreeBSD's ipsec code > > ported from OpenBSD's implementation? If so, what might be the impact > > of this? > > > > Thanks, > > Victor Lyapunov. > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 16:05:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1E9B106566B for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:05:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45DBC8FC1D for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:05:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id oBHG2Lsl095090; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:02:21 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id oBHG2Lwe095089; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:02:21 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:02:21 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Vincent Hoffman Message-ID: <20101217160221.GB94970@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <4D0B4D1D.8010700@gmail.com> <20101217152709.GE94554@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <4D0B84F5.4010905@unsane.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D0B84F5.4010905@unsane.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SEBSD is dead? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:05:25 -0000 On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 03:42:45PM +0000, Vincent Hoffman wrote: > On 17/12/2010 15:27, Jerry McAllister wrote: > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 08:14:22AM -0500, Outback Dingo wrote: > > > >> SeBSD is a FreeBSD project for security enhancement... ACLs and stuff... its > >> part of FreeBSD > > Something like SeLinux those other guys use??? > > Good job that wasnt FBI sponsored, those NSA guys are far more > trustworthy ;) ??? I missed something there. Anyway, SeLinux ain't 100% popular over there I noticed. Maybe it is just a matter of getting used to it. I got tired of reading the posts on it, so haven't figured out if they were substantive or just whiney. ////jerry > > ////jerry > > > > > >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Odhiambo Washington wrote: > >> > >>> 2010/12/17 zY > >>> > >>>> guys, I have a question. SEBSD is dead? Please tell me its > >>> latestprogress. > >>>> Thanks. > >>>> > >>>> > >>> What is it? A FreeBSD port? > >>> Here we discuss FreeBSD, unless you are porting something from somewhere:) > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Best regards, > >>> Odhiambo WASHINGTON, > >>> Nairobi,KE > >>> +254733744121/+254722743223 > >>> _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ > >>> Damn!! > >>> _______________________________________________ > >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > >>> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >>> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 16:11:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88AFA106564A; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:11:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1-6.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 402538FC12; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:11:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:5022:4efd:b73a:4846] ([IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:5022:4efd:b73a:4846]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBHGBI5E031519 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:11:18 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-ID: <4D0B8BA5.5070900@sentex.net> Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:11:17 -0500 From: Mike Tancsa User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jackoroses@gmail.com References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12 Cc: security-officer@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: FreeBSD IPSec stack contains backdoors? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:11:22 -0000 Strange, reads like a totally reasoned response to me to an issue that is somewhere between a practical joke and something critical. I will go with the SECTeam's assessment. They have a proven track record for assessing and dealing with security issues. ---Mike On 12/17/2010 10:36 AM, Mike L wrote: > Reads like an unacceptable response to an issue that seems quite critical. > > > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 4:31 AM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > >> The FreeBSD security officer team has already written an official >> response about this. Please have a look at: >> >> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2010-December/005746.html >> >> Regards, >> Giorgos >> >> On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:28:37 +0600, Victor Lyapunov < >> fullblaststorm@gmail.com> wrote: >>> ---------- Forwarded message ---------- >>> From: Victor Lyapunov >>> Date: 2010/12/15 >>> Subject: FreeBSD IPSec stack contains backdoors? >>> To: FreeBSD Mailing List >>> >>> Hi folks, >>> Recently OpenBSD developer Gregory Perry disclosed information about >>> possible backdoors in OpenBSD IPSec stack (see >>> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.tech/22557) In particular, >>> Gregory Perry, who has been working on a OpenBSD -ish implementation >>> of IPSec says a number of backdoors have been introduced into the >>> code. >>> >>> As far as I am aware, FreeBSD contains considerable amount of code >>> ported from OpenBSD. The question is: was the FreeBSD's ipsec code >>> ported from OpenBSD's implementation? If so, what might be the impact >>> of this? >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Victor Lyapunov. >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 16:11:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 773B110656B8 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:11:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wmoran@potentialtech.com) Received: from mail.potentialtech.com (internet.potentialtech.com [66.167.251.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 440C88FC0A for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:11:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from overdrive.ws.pitbpa0.priv.collaborativefusion.com (pr40.pitbpa0.pub.collaborativefusion.com [206.210.89.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.potentialtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0A12FF7419; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:11:28 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:11:27 -0500 From: Bill Moran To: jackoroses@gmail.com Message-Id: <20101217111127.6ff882ca.wmoran@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: Bill Moran X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.0.3 (GTK+ 2.20.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: FreeBSD IPSec stack contains backdoors? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:11:30 -0000 In response to Mike L : > Reads like an unacceptable response to an issue that seems quite critical. Go to hell. This whole thing has been completely blown out of proportion, and I'm sick of the FUD and all the other associated bullshit. As has already been revealed by people WHO WERE THERE who are willing to give actual details: The NSA and the FBI were using OpenBSD code to experiment with whether backdoors could be created. The did not submit their resultant code, and had no intention of doing so. It was an experiment, which is part of what open source is all about. You, Greg attention-whore Perry, and the mass-media all need to go back to snapping paparazzi photos of celebrities. Here, I formally double DES' bounty. If anyone can find any FBI inserted backdoors in such a way as to meet DES' criteria, I'll pay out the same as whatever he pays out. > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 4:31 AM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > > The FreeBSD security officer team has already written an official > > response about this. Please have a look at: > > > > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2010-December/005746.html > > > > Regards, > > Giorgos > > > > On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:28:37 +0600, Victor Lyapunov < > > fullblaststorm@gmail.com> wrote: > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > > From: Victor Lyapunov > > > Date: 2010/12/15 > > > Subject: FreeBSD IPSec stack contains backdoors? > > > To: FreeBSD Mailing List > > > > > > Hi folks, > > > Recently OpenBSD developer Gregory Perry disclosed information about > > > possible backdoors in OpenBSD IPSec stack (see > > > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.tech/22557) In particular, > > > Gregory Perry, who has been working on a OpenBSD -ish implementation > > > of IPSec says a number of backdoors have been introduced into the > > > code. > > > > > > As far as I am aware, FreeBSD contains considerable amount of code > > > ported from OpenBSD. The question is: was the FreeBSD's ipsec code > > > ported from OpenBSD's implementation? If so, what might be the impact > > > of this? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Victor Lyapunov. > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" -- Bill Moran http://www.potentialtech.com http://people.collaborativefusion.com/~wmoran/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 16:32:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B8E31065679 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:32:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from igloo.linux.gr (igloo.linux.gr [62.1.205.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D47FF8FC15 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:32:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Spam-Status: No X-Hellug-MailScanner-From: keramida@ceid.upatras.gr X-Hellug-MailScanner-SpamCheck: not spam, SpamAssassin (not cached, score=-2.9, required 5, autolearn=not spam, ALL_TRUSTED -1.00, BAYES_00 -1.90) X-Hellug-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-Hellug-MailScanner-ID: oBHGVtn1029790 Received: from gkeramidas-glaptop.linux.gr ([74.125.57.36]) (authenticated bits=0) by igloo.linux.gr (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id oBHGVtn1029790 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 17 Dec 2010 18:32:01 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: jackoroses@gmail.com References: Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:31:49 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Mike L.'s message of "Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:36:39 -0500") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD IPSec stack contains backdoors? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:32:09 -0000 --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:36:39 -0500, Mike L wrote: > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 4:31 AM, Giorgos Keramidas = wrote: >> The FreeBSD security officer team has already written an official >> response about this. Please have a look at: >> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2010-December/005746= .html > > Reads like an unacceptable response to an issue that seems quite critical. On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:11:17 -0500, Mike Tancsa wrote: > Strange, reads like a totally reasoned response to me to an issue that > is somewhere between a practical joke and something critical. I will > go with the SECTeam's assessment. They have a proven track record for > assessing and dealing with security issues. Mike L, unacceptable or not this is the response of people who have been involved with FreeBSD security for a long time. I think their response is reasonable, given the out-of-scale proportions that the entire issue seems to have been blown into when magazine-style web sites picked it up and started 'decorating' the original email of Theo with their own view of what the message between the lines MIGHT have been. The role of the security officer team is not to take an issue that has been blown entirely out of proportion and add to the FUD. It's their responsibility to handle security incidents on a fact-based basis, and there are very little "real facts" out there about this particular theory right now. I don't know why you consider the security officer reply `unacceptable', but I'm relatively sure you will agree that they are quite sensible when they say: As always, anyone who believes that they have found a vulnerability affecting FreeBSD is requested to contact secteam at freebsd.org. I think that's a quite reasonable, sensible and down to earth thing to say. The rest of what the interwebs seems to be writing about these particular allegations are, to the best of my current knowledge, just a conspiracy theory trying to become as public as possible. I too will agree with Mike Tansa. I'll go 100% with the SECTeam=E2=80=99s assessment. They have a proven track record for assessing and dealing with security issues. =2D----------------------------------------------------------------------- Note: Let's keep the email traffic of security-officer down a bit. They don't really have to get Cc: copies of *all* the email messages of all the people subscribed to freebsd-questions. It's probably annoying and it may even turn out to be a waste of their time, or even obstruct them From=20seeing other, really *important* stuff about security issues. =2D----------------------------------------------------------------------- --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAk0LkHYACgkQ1g+UGjGGA7ZxnACgvrxdwphKF9WDwiueR+Vbnfos KXMAmgOxYJveTHTDucQe346mFG0KZEuC =cdOG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 16:54:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 693B81065672 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:54:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevin.wilcox@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21D758FC14 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:54:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywp6 with SMTP id 6so401498ywp.13 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:54:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=SmCebj4OS43n9ohTaCctCyzpA2fwZnLLlFknfnfHaKI=; b=DWdOUra/TI6KpdMXHBze3XYs+SPY+vgA7BOlithdIlFDX1CoH3XifmuwjUWRepSAB2 Y0rKgbIe9qXlrF8DdhpUAM/es0b2dST7RuoehwnE4NZizz0UnxkTNjNjzCB//g0kWLzM UFsdc8GiaFxlLiD8wa0ufa14pPCMs38mkMiF4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ARoTcWSpE2b7gbLn9kHmGfcGW8OkLnybtsdQn8zZgDP0QeDyr3S29yDk+8mcAY37xt 06zjB+2IWoI1LaR3L8HtDeQJM7HtN0IscvDfMwm4V+ZGaDzVcfedMDPgjq4CmGldBY3k 19RWUmZdxOg34p43moYUb58Z8ADRVBEGmuvDg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.91.203.6 with SMTP id f6mr2446970agq.30.1292603237526; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:27:17 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.91.111.11 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:27:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 11:27:17 -0500 Message-ID: From: Kevin Wilcox To: jackoroses@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: FreeBSD IPSec stack contains backdoors? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:54:36 -0000 On 17 December 2010 10:36, Mike L wrote: > Reads like an unacceptable response to an issue that seems quite critical. Here, let me re-iterate for those that may not have a copy of what you're saying is unacceptable in front of them: o we're aware there's talk about some projects possibly having been compromised a decade ago o we have ports of those projects in our project o the code that ends up in FreeBSD from those other projects rarely resembles the original project's code o in the porting process, bugs may unintentionally be introduced or removed o bugs present in the upstream project may not be found in FreeBSD's version o people are welcome and encouraged to look at the FreeBSD code, provide fixes and/or decide for themselves if they want to use it What more do you want them to say? How is this is not a perfectly reasonable response? Cutting security-officer@ out because I'm pretty sure Colin reads this list. kmw From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 16:58:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3260E10656A6 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:58:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@g8kbv.demon.co.uk) Received: from anchor-post-2.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-2.mail.demon.net [195.173.77.133]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDFAE8FC1B for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:58:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.225.127.64] (helo=[192.168.33.1]) by anchor-post-2.mail.demon.net with esmtpa (AUTH g8kbv) (Exim 4.69) id 1PTddj-0004el-lZ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:58:43 +0000 From: "Dave" To: Indexer Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:58:42 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <4D0B96C2.9657.8D65EAF@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> Priority: normal In-reply-to: References: <20101215120036.DFC371065849@hub.freebsd.org>, <4D0A6AC6.4995.44283A1@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk>, X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.52) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Noob Jail question. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:58:45 -0000 Hi.. I've actualy got a "messing about" PC with 8.1 on, that I often play with during lunch times at work. Trouble is, been working through lunchtimes for the last week or three. Self teaching is good, you certainly learn things, but though I'm not in need of instant self gratification, it's a bit frustrating the time it takes to learn, and then get it sorted, when I idealy want it to "just work". Still, for the price (free of course) I can't complain, and it's not as if I'm doing it for a job, or charging anyone for it. If I was, I'd take paid for advice, and pass the cost on! Thanks for the encoragement.. Dave B. On 17 Dec 2010 at 12:14, Indexer wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > > Indexer and Da Rock, many thanks, more reading, and some fiddling > > needed I think. > > It is the best way to learn. Setup a VM of fbsd 8.1 on your computer, > and just play with it on that with jails, and learn what you can an > cant do. Remember that if you ever need help of course, these email > lists are great. Also, read the FBSD handbook, it has some great > instructions > > Isnt self directed learning great ;) > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 18:05:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1575106566B; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 18:05:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 522568FC08; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 18:05:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from park.js.berklix.net (p5B22D826.dip.t-dialin.net [91.34.216.38]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id oBHI5jSZ040447; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 18:05:46 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by park.js.berklix.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oBHI7gDP039805; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:07:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oBHI7VCO010182; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:07:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201012171807.oBHI7VCO010182@fire.js.berklix.net> To: jackoroses@gmail.com From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://www.berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://www.berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Fri, 17 Dec 2010 10:36:39 EST." Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:07:31 +0100 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: security-officer@freebsd.org, FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: FreeBSD IPSec stack contains backdoors? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 18:05:48 -0000 Hi Mike L, > Reads like an unacceptable response to an issue that seems quite critical. 1st.: Top posting on BSD lists is deprecated. 2nd: Serious security issues are best dealt with on security@ questions@ list was originally created for eg install program to point beginners at. 3rd.: OpenBSD & FreeBSD etc are volunteer projects, Best be grateful when volunteers dedicate leisure time free of charge, to look at problems or allegations of problems. 4th _IF_ this is really "quite critical" to you, Yo can throw time or money at the problem to find a solution: Either: - Your leisure time to read parts of sources & report back to security team, who I guess would be glad to co-ordinate if enough people volunteer to do a code read through. - Your employed time if your employer thinks its important. - Your money or your employers' if you have dependent customers There's various BSD consultants lists, eg I maintain a global geographic indexed list of consultants: http://www.berklix.com//consultants/ ( which also points to freebsd.org alphabetic consultants list ) ( No I'm not looking for work, busy elsewhere ) There's also various BSD etc foundations if you want to donate money indirect to pay toward a code review. > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 4:31 AM, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > > > The FreeBSD security officer team has already written an official > > response about this. Please have a look at: > > > > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2010-December/005746.html > > > > Regards, > > Giorgos > > > > On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:28:37 +0600, Victor Lyapunov < > > fullblaststorm@gmail.com> wrote: > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > > From: Victor Lyapunov > > > Date: 2010/12/15 > > > Subject: FreeBSD IPSec stack contains backdoors? > > > To: FreeBSD Mailing List > > > > > > Hi folks, > > > Recently OpenBSD developer Gregory Perry disclosed information about > > > possible backdoors in OpenBSD IPSec stack (see > > > http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.os.openbsd.tech/22557) In particular, > > > Gregory Perry, who has been working on a OpenBSD -ish implementation > > > of IPSec says a number of backdoors have been introduced into the > > > code. > > > > > > As far as I am aware, FreeBSD contains considerable amount of code > > > ported from OpenBSD. The question is: was the FreeBSD's ipsec code > > > ported from OpenBSD's implementation? If so, what might be the impact > > > of this? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > Victor Lyapunov. > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Mail plain text; Not quoted-printable, or HTML or base 64. Avoid top posting, it cripples itemised cumulative responses. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 18:42:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AD2E106566C for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 18:42:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@insightbb.com) Received: from mxsf14.insightbb.com (mxsf14.insightbb.com [74.128.0.96]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 575A58FC1D for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 18:42:28 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,189,1291611600"; d="scan'208";a="236483822" Received: from unknown (HELO asav01.insightbb.com) ([172.31.249.123]) by mxsf14.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 17 Dec 2010 13:42:27 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkszAMc9C01KgCiCO2dsb2JhbACIMY1qjhUMAQEBATUvwTCFSgSEZQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,189,1291611600"; d="scan'208";a="319539968" Received: from 74-128-40-130.dhcp.insightbb.com (HELO laptop2.stevenfriedrich.org) ([74.128.40.130]) by asavout01.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 17 Dec 2010 13:42:27 -0500 From: Steven Friedrich To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:42:28 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.1-RELEASE-p2; KDE/4.5.4; i386; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201012171342.29314.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> Subject: avahi-app port build fails on one system, not other X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 18:42:28 -0000 I even tried portupgrade -fR avahi-app. Here's the last of the log: signals-marshal.c: In function '_ga_signals_marshal_VOID__INT_ENUM_STRING_STRING_STRING_STRING_POINTER_INT_POINTER_INT': signals-marshal.c:90: warning: ISO C forbids conversion of object pointer to function pointer type signals-marshal.c: In function '_ga_signals_marshal_VOID__INT_ENUM_STRING_STRING_STRING_UINT': signals-marshal.c:139: warning: ISO C forbids conversion of object pointer to function pointer type signals-marshal.c: In function '_ga_signals_marshal_VOID__INT_ENUM_STRING_UINT_UINT_POINTER_INT_INT': signals-marshal.c:186: warning: ISO C forbids conversion of object pointer to function pointer type CC libavahi_gobject_la-ga-client-enumtypes.lo CC libavahi_gobject_la-ga-entry-group-enumtypes.lo CC libavahi_gobject_la-ga-enums-enumtypes.lo CCLD libavahi-gobject.la GISCAN Avahi-0.6.gir g-ir-scanner: warning: Option --strip-prefix has been deprecated; see --identifier-prefix and --symbol-prefix. /usr/include/machine/endian.h:107: syntax error, unexpected '{' in ' return (__extension__ ({ register __uint32_t __X = (_x); __asm ("bswap %0" : "+r" (__X)); __X; }));' at '{' /usr/include/machine/endian.h:107: syntax error, unexpected ';' in ' return (__extension__ ({ register __uint32_t __X = (_x); __asm ("bswap %0" : "+r" (__X)); __X; }));' at ';' /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libicui18n.so.38" not found, required by "libavahi-glib.so.1" Command '['/usr/ports/net/avahi-app/work/avahi-0.6.28/avahi-gobject/tmp- introspectYHqC7w/Avahi-0.6', '--introspect-dump=/usr/ports/net/avahi- app/work/avahi-0.6.28/avahi-gobject/tmp- introspectYHqC7w/types.txt,/usr/ports/net/avahi-app/work/avahi-0.6.28/avahi- gobject/tmp-introspectYHqC7w/dump.xml']' returned non-zero exit status 1 gmake[3]: *** [Avahi-0.6.gir] Error 1 gmake[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/avahi-app/work/avahi-0.6.28/avahi- gobject' gmake[2]: *** [all] Error 2 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/avahi-app/work/avahi-0.6.28/avahi- gobject' gmake[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/net/avahi-app/work/avahi-0.6.28' gmake: *** [all] Error 2 *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/net/avahi-app. -- System Name: laptop2.StevenFriedrich.org Hardware: 2.80GHz Intel Pentium 4 (HTT) with 2 GB memory OS version: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p2 i386 (5.1 MB kernel) Window Manager(s): kde4-4.5.4 X Window System: xorg-7.5 X.Org X Server 1.7.5 FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm: 32bit 2009061500/i386) Installed devices: pcm0: (play/rec) default From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 21:51:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B58E106566B for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 21:51:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matej.serc@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pv0-f182.google.com (mail-pv0-f182.google.com [74.125.83.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD8C48FC0C for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 21:51:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pvc22 with SMTP id 22so185929pvc.13 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:51:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=SOgstLDDLytZfng27y0yo4O5rwhZStTQc9Vo/wIWx84=; b=RuvHGy7iOwE6hfk0n7ygxcmhzVAFy0qej8O/fuOvw5RvDCcu2KEq0y1RlixL3OxCM1 wJQbLCwacc/kH7ufQhWnCdfaxeznDkeKDN5kGzcn6YX/8HB6+oBymnUtO5dPbwg1jc7S rd0WN3ItGnLRCXNvhjkNFmkuQYv7QN6h223vc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=GumVvvcxxozEq9j1yJTo8KVeE6vjm5266MJSaTyrCubb/TbOEb78umx7RVpR0+iJc0 ZcSlP0EAY0EaSsvr8AnvznbG08w6TmASnou6yELFWQwMn2hHxur4Ynyw+zUnucURY1yM 6gqxppbjYGTDMFovxrk56sXYiC46pAM4nmHV0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.142.191.20 with SMTP id o20mr1052929wff.49.1292622714529; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:51:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.88.5 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 13:51:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 22:51:54 +0100 Message-ID: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Matej_=C5=A0erc?= To: krad Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 7.2-RELEASE amd64 hangs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 21:51:55 -0000 Hi, thank you very much for all the answers and ideas. We have found out that after the server was moved to different switch in the co-location centre th= e network interface and the switch auto-negotiated at the 10 Mbit Full Duplex mode. After setting it to GBit manually, everything seems to be working normally, but I am going to check it for some more time. SNMP connects to the local, isolated network from public and we have control over all the devices in the network. I will post if anything new happens, but for now it seems this throughput limitation was causing those issues (although I am still wondering why ther= e is nothing in log files, but due to network "overload" every service we wer= e trying to connect to through network was not working any more). Thank you for your time. BR, Matej On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 2:48 PM, krad wrote: > > > On 17 December 2010 13:47, krad wrote: > >> >> >> On 16 December 2010 17:42, Matej =C5=A0erc wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am experiencing a strange issue that has never occurred to me in all >>> the >>> years of using different versions of FreeBSD. >>> >>> One of our servers, which was running without any issues until yesterda= y, >>> stopped responding for two times now - yesterday and today. About three >>> days >>> ago another process of pulling out SNMP data from devices was added, bu= t >>> I >>> was looking the system load and the system was working normally and als= o >>> processes were cmpleting successfully within the timeframe of 5 minutes >>> (much faster, they completed in about 2 minutes). I also want to mentio= n >>> that those SNMP pulling processes were already working about a month or >>> so >>> on the same server (no hardware was changed in the meantime) and I am >>> pretty >>> sure that it should work normally as it did. >>> >>> My main problem is, that there is abcolutely nothing in log files - no >>> errors, no warnings, nothing. No strange messages, every process just >>> stops >>> logging at one time and then continues after the reboot. Another >>> interesting >>> issue is that both hangs occured at approximately the same time, but >>> there >>> was nobody in the server room and also no one was logged into the serve= r >>> at >>> that time except me. About 10 minutes before hang I was investigating >>> processes and everything was very normal - no large CPU eating or memor= y >>> eating processes. This might be interesting, even after every process >>> stops >>> responding, I was still able to ping the network interfaces and receive >>> ICMP >>> replies back. >>> >>> Of course my idea about it is that it must be connected to some hardwar= e >>> problems - my suggestion was to make some memory tests. But I would lik= e >>> to >>> hear some your oppinions about the entire situation. Could some power >>> supply >>> issues be doing it? The server is about a year old and has, as I alread= y >>> mentioned, worked like a charm until now. How come there is no kernel >>> panic >>> since no daemon seems to be working? Why is network interface still up >>> and >>> working? >>> >>> I was unable to go to the co-location facility so I can't say what was = on >>> the screen at both times, but I suppose there was nothing else than >>> messages >>> I can read from log files. >>> >>> I know that 7.2 is pretty old version, but it was working until now on >>> the >>> same hardware and we had no reason to change that. Now the system is >>> after >>> reboot again running smoothly and without any issues at all. >>> >>> Thank you very much for any information regarding the issue. >>> >>> BR, Matej >>> _______________________________________________ >>> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >>> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >>> >> >> I'm not a huge fan of letting snmp spawn heavy weight scripts and >> processes as it is to easy for a remote machine to effectively dos the >> machine. I realise you are fairly sure the scripts arent an issue, but t= ry >> croning them every 5 minutes, and writing the results to a file. SNMP ca= n >> then simply retrieve the results from the file. This safeguard to to a >> certain extent, in that it stops many processes being spawned. All you h= ave >> to watch after that is the job run time >> >> >> > Also lets stops resources being tied up on the monitoring machine, as it > doent have to hang around for x minutes for the results for its query > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 22:07:49 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C808B1065674 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 22:07:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77EAD8FC17 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 22:07:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.193]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 378635C21 for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 08:12:38 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4D0BDE5D.2010308@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 08:04:13 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101119 Thunderbird/3.0.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101215120036.DFC371065849@hub.freebsd.org>, <4D0A6AC6.4995.44283A1@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk>, <4D0B96C2.9657.8D65EAF@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <4D0B96C2.9657.8D65EAF@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Noob Jail question. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 22:07:49 -0000 On 12/18/10 02:58, Dave wrote: > Hi.. > > I've actualy got a "messing about" PC with 8.1 on, that I often play with > during lunch times at work. Trouble is, been working through lunchtimes > for the last week or three. > > Self teaching is good, you certainly learn things, but though I'm not in > need of instant self gratification, it's a bit frustrating the time it > takes to learn, and then get it sorted, when I idealy want it to "just > work". > > If you take them time now, it'll get quicker in the future. Happens to me all the time, so I understand the frustration, but hang in there and eventually you'll be flipping them out wherever you like. Being able to ask sometimes stupid questions here to get things clear is always handy too- sometimes something that should be obvious evades our comprehension :) > Still, for the price (free of course) I can't complain, and it's not as > if I'm doing it for a job, or charging anyone for it. If I was, I'd take > paid for advice, and pass the cost on! > > It'll pay off in the end. IF you were getting paid for it, you'd have the knowledge for future clients, so I'm not sure how that fits in the economics ;) That said, I've found that paid advice is not always as helpful or knowledgeable as free... That may not be the case where you though. Here things are ruled by how much can be gained now and in the near future such as "off the shelf". > Thanks for the encoragement.. > > Dave B. > > > On 17 Dec 2010 at 12:14, Indexer wrote: > > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> >>> >>> Indexer and Da Rock, many thanks, more reading, and some fiddling >>> needed I think. >>> >> It is the best way to learn. Setup a VM of fbsd 8.1 on your computer, >> and just play with it on that with jails, and learn what you can an >> cant do. Remember that if you ever need help of course, these email >> lists are great. Also, read the FBSD handbook, it has some great >> instructions >> >> Isnt self directed learning great ;) >> >> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 22:20:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB107106566C for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 22:20:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gull@gull.us) Received: from mail-ey0-f178.google.com (mail-ey0-f178.google.com [209.85.215.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C7E8FC14 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 22:20:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyh5 with SMTP id 5so509484eyh.37 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:20:56 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.31.78 with SMTP id x14mr2823685ebc.1.1292624456220; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:20:56 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.47.78 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:20:55 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [64.81.163.112] In-Reply-To: <20101217160221.GB94970@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <4D0B4D1D.8010700@gmail.com> <20101217152709.GE94554@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <4D0B84F5.4010905@unsane.co.uk> <20101217160221.GB94970@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:20:55 -0800 Message-ID: From: David Brodbeck To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: SEBSD is dead? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 22:20:57 -0000 On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Jerry McAllister wrote: > Anyway, SeLinux ain't 100% popular over there I noticed. > Maybe it is just a matter of getting used to it. =A0I got > tired of reading the posts on it, so haven't figured out > if they were substantive or just whiney. The problem with SELinux is it becomes very difficult to configure properly if you don't have a normal, out-of-the-box configuration. For example, I never did figure out how to keep it from blocking an rsync backup. I disabled it after that, because a system I can't back up is pretty useless no matter how secure it is. :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 23:44:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BA6C106566B for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 23:44:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B89E38FC16 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 23:44:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yokozuna.lan (213-84-73-82.adsl.xs4all.nl [80.101.78.208]) by smtp-vbr7.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oBHNi180087614 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 18 Dec 2010 00:44:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Received: from yokozuna.lan (yokozuna.lan [IPv6:::1]) by yokozuna.lan (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBHNi1W0098928; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 00:44:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 00:44:01 +0100 (CET) From: Marco Beishuizen Sender: marco@yokozuna.lan To: Steven Friedrich In-Reply-To: <201012171342.29314.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> Message-ID: References: <201012171342.29314.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: avahi-app port build fails on one system, not other X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Marco Beishuizen List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 23:44:04 -0000 On Fri, 17 Dec 2010, Steven Friedrich wrote: > I even tried portupgrade -fR avahi-app. > > Here's the last of the log: > > ... > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libicui18n.so.38" not found, required by > "libavahi-glib.so.1" > ... I'm having this too. I think this happens because the portupgrade of devel/icu installs a new version of libicui18n (libicui18n.so.46) and deletes the old one (so.38). Lots of ports still need the old version like libavahi-app. I'll try to make a symlink so.38 to so.46 and see what happens. Regards, Marco -- "That's no answer," Job said, "And for someone who's supposed to be omnipotent, let me tell you `tabernacle' has only one l." -- Woody Allen, "Without Feathers" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 17 23:08:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 296BB106564A for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 23:08:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patel.cricket@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com (mail-yw0-f54.google.com [209.85.213.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA6358FC19 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 23:08:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywp6 with SMTP id 6so550717ywp.13 for ; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 15:08:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=hugQrnXFEQ27nc9mZ6Fl5aS2R55aygKrSy+g/0PvmFs=; b=uFqkjEZS/oj5tDuUQkNfC733ICjgU1UO9jZHC1bEq3OF8C7X8F2+XaO02tEphPxbqB Ml5WJ35SsMbSIeh/wTiX+BYyWQbsmI6y7DrpSTNrP2xBe/GeI31DeDpTY1AMDan7V+YG bezkIlqL4fXTRdFqGgeuT+zVaGbGIZu4iHUIg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=TQROUCSdAMmplzac+DRq++VEXXBGCUi9AbcNbGOkSbkADjs9vzw7S0kJDOqWb866TD zMNvLAWP8ztyp2MUick5SFtvyGhGAR0n9Lr5MKEcVO7PLzf8f81/Lknv6DDSLZIhQ+J3 4HiUOdUosChZ+NVa6XWO5nGh1RUHhOQxziHn8= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.102.179 with SMTP id d39mr2500679yhg.48.1292625503098; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:38:23 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.109.143 with HTTP; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:38:23 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 14:38:23 -0800 Message-ID: From: Nihir Parikh To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 23:52:07 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: FreeBSD-8.1 on iscsi - Help Needed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 23:08:38 -0000 I am trying to install FreeBSD-8.1 on a iscsi target disk but when I start installation it complains about "No Hard disk found". I have iscsi enabled network adapter and I can configure the iscsi disk in the network adapter's iscsi ROM. When the system boots up from FreeBSD installation CD, I go to the command prompt and load if_em, iscsi_initiator and iscsi modules. I can run enable-module if_em command, but when I run enable-module iscsi_initiator it complains that iscsi_initiator not found. Has anyone installed FreeBSD on iscsi target? If so, what have you done so that during installation FreeBSD sees iscsi target as a disk on which to install the OS. Thanks Nihir From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 18 00:11:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1788106564A for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 00:11:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 805F78FC1A for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 00:11:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.193]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 911CA5C21 for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 10:15:55 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4D0BFB43.7020506@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 10:07:31 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101119 Thunderbird/3.0.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4D0B4D1D.8010700@gmail.com> <20101217152709.GE94554@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <4D0B84F5.4010905@unsane.co.uk> <20101217160221.GB94970@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: SEBSD is dead? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 00:11:05 -0000 On 12/18/10 08:20, David Brodbeck wrote: > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Jerry McAllister wrote: > >> Anyway, SeLinux ain't 100% popular over there I noticed. >> Maybe it is just a matter of getting used to it. I got >> tired of reading the posts on it, so haven't figured out >> if they were substantive or just whiney. >> > The problem with SELinux is it becomes very difficult to configure > properly if you don't have a normal, out-of-the-box configuration. > > For example, I never did figure out how to keep it from blocking an > rsync backup. I disabled it after that, because a system I can't back > up is pretty useless no matter how secure it is. :) > I always thought it was a PITA, but I did figure out a couple of things (after hours fart-assing around). You have to take the error and make it into a module that allows the process to continue, but I don't blame anyone for just walking away- sometimes even then it still didn't work. Mind you, unlike most things, you can't just stow the info away for quick retrieval to adjust something on the fly- it still takes you that long again: 1) you have to follow a different method again for each instance and 2) its an impossible process to remember! :) Not to mention that it can cascade errors... its a hydra- fix one and another 2 errors crop up! As for whiney- I was one of those (supposedly), and you're just told to shut up and take it because security is more important, and you should take the time to learn something (that will take the same length of time to fix _every_ time). I agree on the security, but the usage and howto shouldn't be so obscure as to confuse even the most determined learner. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 18 10:51:35 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69FA91065670 for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 10:51:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF4C58FC17 for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 10:51:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so1368479wwf.31 for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 02:51:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=+s9+7SFYyLPDZ4d42dXW9haS1/2LLuwDY2QSXwJwu3E=; b=gqTcOh38pJsMSPOHeRwRjB8Q6XrS5HyL1SIOflx5wASpq+UQzZhOd4SDMwYo6OkQKj SSSnDWYwa1eo5VCzpeqb8mcKKSp2V7kmhu83SwO2E3RNyzRWLsyU3jI2oSrIqvPgPA1G Lw2ha97h0IGQoWmaWOVp64rub+MWaUF7+SbOE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=qNBoV22QIaYt4EOUyLgKI6WsX0RYKqPvVDEqGyjYQ5gg50xyjLzp8QC4mrQ/fIgTGh 6peWZUbYS3YEXmZgswL9eoioYjhplNMRx2qN4n9bRojMvkyak5nNCNpGBgY3YkiGG6xm j6UzYTNj2bfc2YjIfQKrIuTmzxeoH5PcNfxnM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.52.143 with SMTP id e15mr5130642wec.44.1292669493843; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 02:51:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.72.198 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 02:51:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4D0B4D1D.8010700@gmail.com> <20101217152709.GE94554@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <4D0B84F5.4010905@unsane.co.uk> <20101217160221.GB94970@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 10:51:33 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: David Brodbeck Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SEBSD is dead? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 10:51:35 -0000 On 17 December 2010 22:20, David Brodbeck wrote: > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Jerry McAllister wrote: > > Anyway, SeLinux ain't 100% popular over there I noticed. > > Maybe it is just a matter of getting used to it. I got > > tired of reading the posts on it, so haven't figured out > > if they were substantive or just whiney. > > The problem with SELinux is it becomes very difficult to configure > properly if you don't have a normal, out-of-the-box configuration. > > For example, I never did figure out how to keep it from blocking an > rsync backup. I disabled it after that, because a system I can't back > up is pretty useless no matter how secure it is. :) > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > not sure if it will work on all linuxs but this works fine for me on centos in enforcing mode setsebool -P rsync_disable_trans on From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 18 12:46:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F6301065670 for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 12:46:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@coosemans.org) Received: from mailrelay002.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay002.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B0E98FC18 for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 12:46:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AvsEABM8DE1bsUgS/2dsb2JhbACkM3S8eIVKBA Received: from 18.72-177-91.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([91.177.72.18]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 18 Dec 2010 13:46:03 +0100 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBICk2gM002348; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 13:46:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tijl@coosemans.org) From: Tijl Coosemans To: Dennis Glatting Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 13:45:54 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-PRERELEASE; KDE/4.5.2; i386; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart5051018.dIFWhhqqO6"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201012181346.00732.tijl@coosemans.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /usr/include/machine/endian.h:123: syntax error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 12:46:06 -0000 --nextPart5051018.dIFWhhqqO6 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thursday 16 December 2010 07:49:41 Dennis Glatting wrote: >=20 > While compiling a port... >=20 >=20 > btw> uname -a > FreeBSD btw 8.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-PRERELEASE #55: Sat Dec 11 22:48:5= 9=20 > PST 2010 root@btw:/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/BTW amd64 >=20 >=20 >=20 > btw# portupgrade devel/libgdata >=20 > >=20 > GISCAN gdata/GData-0.0.gir > /usr/include/machine/endian.h:123: syntax error, unexpected '{' in '=20 > return (__extension__ ({ register __uint64_t __X =3D (_x); __asm ("bswap = %0"=20 > : "+r" (__X)); __X; }));' at '{' I couldn't reproduce this. Do you have any special CFLAGS perhaps? --nextPart5051018.dIFWhhqqO6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iF4EABEIAAYFAk0MrQgACgkQfoCS2CCgtitQxAD/Z4daP+a8eTrYjjkuSlrCSp0v a8yGoQqMeqGGwUst5TMA+wUShOC4JqXhROVT5bSUrF5IAPtf91eUEanv2D2JL6no =7ZOk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5051018.dIFWhhqqO6-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 18 15:23:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EDA51065670 for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 15:23:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirg.bris.ac.uk (dirg.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA2998FC12 for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 15:23:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsd.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.59] helo=ncs.bris.ac.uk) by dirg.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PTycs-0007mz-Dm; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 15:23:14 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncs.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PTycr-0005le-Uy; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 15:23:14 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBIFNDLZ042684; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 15:23:13 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oBIFNDuk042683; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 15:23:13 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 15:23:13 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Tijl Coosemans Message-ID: <20101218152313.GA42662@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Tijl Coosemans , Anton Shterenlikht , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101129130415.GA47982@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <201012061406.31522.tijl@coosemans.org> <20101206151630.GB55368@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <201012151858.58520.tijl@coosemans.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201012151858.58520.tijl@coosemans.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Anton Shterenlikht , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: binutils problem? WAS [Re: static linking error: ELF binary type "0" not known. Exec format error. Binary file not executable.] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 15:23:16 -0000 On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 06:58:50PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Monday 06 December 2010 16:16:30 Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 02:06:22PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > >> On Monday 29 November 2010 14:04:16 Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > >>> ----- Forwarded message from Marcel Moolenaar ----- > >>>> On Nov 10, 2010, at 5:32 AM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > >>>>> [ia64] > >>>>> ia64% file a.out > >>>>> a.out: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, IA-64, version 1 (SYSV), statically > >>>>> linked, not stripped > >>>>> > >>>>> [amd64] > >>>>> amd64% file a.out > >>>>> a.out: ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (FreeBSD), > >>>>> statically linked, for FreeBSD 9.0 (900023), not stripped > >>>> > >>>> The branding on ia64 is wrong. The executable is not marked as being > >>>> a FreeBSD executable. It's declared as SYSV, whereas on amd64 it's > >>>> properly declared as FreeBSD. > >>>> > >>>> This is a binutils problem. > >>> > >>> Anybody here can explain better what Marcel meant > >>> by "binutils problem", and how to fix it? > >>> > >>> I've binutils-2.20.1_3 installed from devel/binutils. > >> > >> As a workaround you could manually brand the executable: > >> brandelf -f 9 a.out > > > > this works fine. > > A fix has been committed to CURRENT, 8-STABLE and 7-STABLE. You should > no longer have to brand executables manually. yes, just checked, many thanks. anton -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 18 20:55:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4C71106564A for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 20:55:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8BEF8FC16 for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 20:55:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so1650843qwj.13 for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 12:55:14 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.188.144 with SMTP id da16mr2233700qcb.158.1292704331873; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 12:32:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.238.70 with HTTP; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 12:32:11 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [93.221.186.103] Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 21:32:11 +0100 Message-ID: From: "C. P. Ghost" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: geli(8) and amd(8) working together? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 20:55:16 -0000 Hi, I'm wondering how to get the most out of geli(8) encrypted volumes, in combination with something like amd(8) (but without the overhead of NFS, if at all possible) that mounts and umounts file systems only as needed. Basically, I'd like to mount a geli volume on demand (e.g. via amd), but when amd umounts the volume for lack of activity after some time, the geli provider should also "forget" (overwrite in RAM) the key, i.e. detach itself from the underlying geom provider. When amd tries to mount the geli volume again, geli should then ask for the key again (e.g. on the console). The idea is to protect geli encrypted partitions that are idle, so that even if the box is compromized and the power is maintained (somehow), encrypted partition(s) would still require a key after being idle for some time. Any way or ideas how to implement this? Thanks, -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 18 22:18:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F94B1065670 for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 22:18:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@insightbb.com) Received: from mxsf02.insightbb.com (mxsf02.insightbb.com [74.128.0.63]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 499FA8FC13 for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 22:18:03 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,194,1291611600"; d="scan'208";a="929925538" Received: from unknown (HELO asav02.insightbb.com) ([172.31.249.123]) by mxsf02.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 18 Dec 2010 17:18:03 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Aq80AG/BDE1KgCiCO2dsb2JhbACIMZwDDAEBAQE1L7sjhUoEhGU X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,194,1291611600"; d="scan'208";a="421982138" Received: from 74-128-40-130.dhcp.insightbb.com (HELO laptop2.stevenfriedrich.org) ([74.128.40.130]) by asavout02.manage.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 18 Dec 2010 17:18:02 -0500 From: Steven Friedrich To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Marco Beishuizen Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 17:18:01 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.1-RELEASE-p2; KDE/4.5.4; i386; ; ) References: <201012171342.29314.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201012181718.01889.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> Cc: Subject: Re: avahi-app port build fails on one system, not other X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 22:18:04 -0000 On Friday 17 December 2010 6:44:01 pm Marco Beishuizen wrote: > On Fri, 17 Dec 2010, Steven Friedrich wrote: > > I even tried portupgrade -fR avahi-app. > > > > Here's the last of the log: > > > > ... > > /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libicui18n.so.38" not found, > > required by "libavahi-glib.so.1" > > ... > > I'm having this too. I think this happens because the portupgrade of > devel/icu installs a new version of libicui18n (libicui18n.so.46) and > deletes the old one (so.38). Lots of ports still need the old version like > libavahi-app. > > I'll try to make a symlink so.38 to so.46 and see what happens. > > Regards, > Marco I tried portupgrade -fR avahi-app and several others ports. Eventuall, out of frustration I pkg_deinstall -f avahi-app\* and then portupgrade -n avahi-app was successful. I don't know why, but it worked. -- System Name: laptop2.StevenFriedrich.org Hardware: 2.80GHz Intel Pentium 4 (HTT) with 2 GB memory OS version: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p2 i386 (5.1 MB kernel) Window Manager(s): kde4-4.5.4 X Window System: xorg-7.5 X.Org X Server 1.7.5 FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm: 32bit 2009061500/i386) Installed devices: pcm0: (play/rec) default From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 18 23:41:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E15AB106564A for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 23:41:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from judmarc@fastmail.fm) Received: from out3.smtp.messagingengine.com (out3.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF0628FC15 for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 23:41:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.43]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EBF5321; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 18:23:35 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend1.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.160]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 18 Dec 2010 18:23:35 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=messagingengine.com; h=references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:message-id:cc:from:subject:date:to; s=smtpout; bh=JbIv8bN4ZONKlqW1QwBFAellNSU=; b=O33onUybIzBfDWgjI139fPa3Y6Y+dtSwpnGbWreec68k714dlczaGesgTOyjyNPxaDuSN+7EUN3VtATi+2wo6SGGwUzQ6Mhbb2l6oSOrbZ/B8B4iVk88XvlGqJd+5K33BlOWsLf3neEAwzQKh9Vk1qBlio4lAl7lxhCQMC1WtJE= X-Sasl-enc: PY2iCcOgpOY9rQxFqsvoSt76kKEgEOZcighp82ocI7Al 1292714614 Received: from [192.168.0.196] (24.115.236.228.res-cmts.sm.ptd.net [24.115.236.228]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7B7EF4024C7; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 18:23:34 -0500 (EST) References: <201012171342.29314.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> <201012181718.01889.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> In-Reply-To: <201012181718.01889.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8C148a) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8C148a) From: Jud Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 18:23:30 -0500 To: Steven Friedrich Cc: Marco Beishuizen , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: avahi-app port build fails on one system, not other X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 23:41:25 -0000 Apologies for top-post. Because many other ports depend on icu, it might be preferable to update eve= rything at the same time rather than piecemeal: # portupgrade -rf icu-\* Caution: This'll take a while. Jud Sent from my iPhone On Dec 18, 2010, at 5:18 PM, Steven Friedrich wrote:= > On Friday 17 December 2010 6:44:01 pm Marco Beishuizen wrote: >> On Fri, 17 Dec 2010, Steven Friedrich wrote: >>> I even tried portupgrade -fR avahi-app. >>>=20 >>> Here's the last of the log: >>>=20 >>> ... >>> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libicui18n.so.38" not found, >>> required by "libavahi-glib.so.1" >>> ... >>=20 >> I'm having this too. I think this happens because the portupgrade of >> devel/icu installs a new version of libicui18n (libicui18n.so.46) and >> deletes the old one (so.38). Lots of ports still need the old version lik= e >> libavahi-app. >>=20 >> I'll try to make a symlink so.38 to so.46 and see what happens. >>=20 >> Regards, >> Marco >=20 > I tried portupgrade -fR avahi-app and several others ports. >=20 > Eventuall, out of frustration I pkg_deinstall -f avahi-app\* and then=20 > portupgrade -n avahi-app was successful. >=20 > I don't know why, but it worked. >=20 > --=20 > System Name: laptop2.StevenFriedrich.org > Hardware: 2.80GHz Intel Pentium 4 (HTT) with 2 GB memory > OS version: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p2 i386 (5.1 MB kernel) > Window Manager(s): kde4-4.5.4=20 > X Window System: xorg-7.5 X.Org X Server 1.7.5 >=20 > FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm: 32bit 2009061500/i386) > Installed devices: > pcm0: (play/rec) default > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.or= g"