From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 19 00:18:31 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E378106564A for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 00:18:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.22]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E71998FC12 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 00:18:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yokozuna.lan (213-84-73-82.adsl.xs4all.nl [80.101.78.208]) by smtp-vbr2.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oBJ0IQp4028677 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 19 Dec 2010 01:18:26 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Received: from yokozuna.lan (yokozuna.lan [IPv6:::1]) by yokozuna.lan (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBJ0IQ5T011756; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 01:18:26 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from mbeis@xs4all.nl) Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 01:18:26 +0100 (CET) From: Marco Beishuizen Sender: marco@yokozuna.lan To: Jud In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <201012171342.29314.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> <201012181718.01889.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: Steven Friedrich , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: avahi-app port build fails on one system, not other X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Marco Beishuizen List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 00:18:31 -0000 On Sun, 19 Dec 2010, Jud wrote: > Apologies for top-post. > > Because many other ports depend on icu, it might be preferable to update > everything at the same time rather than piecemeal: > > # portupgrade -rf icu-\* > > Caution: This'll take a while. > > Jud This is what I did, but then several ports don't install because of the missing libicui18n.so.38. I eventually made a symlink so.38 to so.46 and after this all upgrades went well. Marco -- The Advertising Agency Song: When your client's hopping mad, Put his picture in the ad. If he still should prove refractory, Add a picture of his factory. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 19 02:12:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 887551065670 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 02:12:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 496B68FC16 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 02:12:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id oBJ2CnsH067073 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 18:12:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id oBJ2CnkL067072 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 18:12:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA14015; Sat, 18 Dec 10 18:09:44 PST Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 18:09:16 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <4d0d694c.MNCBc7X1IUIwLwvi%perryh@pluto.rain.com> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: where are the handbooks? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 02:12:50 -0000 Which of the 8.1-RELEASE distribution sets contains the handbook, developer's handbook, porter's handbook, etc? I thought I had searched everywhere, but must have missed something. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 19 02:16:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70518106564A for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 02:16:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@insightbb.com) Received: from mxsf15.insightbb.com (mxsf15.insightbb.com [74.128.0.97]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3931D8FC13 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 02:16:56 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,195,1291611600"; d="scan'208";a="234419504" Received: from unknown (HELO asav01.insightbb.com) ([172.31.249.123]) by mxsf15.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 18 Dec 2010 21:16:56 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiY0AOv5DE1KgCiCO2dsb2JhbACWHo4WDAEBAQE1L7oRhUoEhGWFKQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,195,1291611600"; d="scan'208";a="319801132" Received: from 74-128-40-130.dhcp.insightbb.com (HELO laptop2.stevenfriedrich.org) ([74.128.40.130]) by asavout01.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 18 Dec 2010 21:16:55 -0500 From: Steven Friedrich To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 21:16:54 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.1-RELEASE-p2; KDE/4.5.4; i386; ; ) References: <201012171342.29314.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> <201012181718.01889.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201012182116.55035.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> Subject: Re: avahi-app port build fails on one system, not other X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 02:16:57 -0000 On Saturday 18 December 2010 6:23:30 pm Jud wrote: > Apologies for top-post. > > Because many other ports depend on icu, it might be preferable to update > everything at the same time rather than piecemeal: > > # portupgrade -rf icu-\* > > Caution: This'll take a while. > > Jud > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Dec 18, 2010, at 5:18 PM, Steven Friedrich wrote: > > On Friday 17 December 2010 6:44:01 pm Marco Beishuizen wrote: > >> On Fri, 17 Dec 2010, Steven Friedrich wrote: > >>> I even tried portupgrade -fR avahi-app. > >>> > >>> Here's the last of the log: > >>> > >>> ... > >>> /libexec/ld-elf.so.1: Shared object "libicui18n.so.38" not found, > >>> required by "libavahi-glib.so.1" > >>> ... > >> > >> I'm having this too. I think this happens because the portupgrade of > >> devel/icu installs a new version of libicui18n (libicui18n.so.46) and > >> deletes the old one (so.38). Lots of ports still need the old version > >> like libavahi-app. > >> > >> I'll try to make a symlink so.38 to so.46 and see what happens. > >> > >> Regards, > >> Marco > > > > I tried portupgrade -fR avahi-app and several others ports. > > > > Eventuall, out of frustration I pkg_deinstall -f avahi-app\* and then > > portupgrade -n avahi-app was successful. > > > > I don't know why, but it worked. > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I had been updating icu with protupgrade -fr icu, but ahavi-app failed to build. I went through trying to update avahi-app for a couple days to no avail. I finally deinstalled and reinstalled. ANd it worked. -- System Name: laptop2.StevenFriedrich.org Hardware: 2.80GHz Intel Pentium 4 (HTT) with 2 GB memory OS version: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p2 i386 (5.1 MB kernel) Window Manager(s): kde4-4.5.4 X Window System: xorg-7.5 X.Org X Server 1.7.5 FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm: 32bit 2009061500/i386) Installed devices: pcm0: (play/rec) default From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 19 02:37:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9054106566B for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 02:37:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A3E48FC0A for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 02:37:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so1766461wwf.31 for ; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 18:37:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Vt5yxSFBuRZXH1WDk/zu/zZtykeVowZOCw9nRuSjfE4=; b=MLaJNK4oduVCrjcNGogd3iaUZP4c+YPctKZCUFQ2hhByQ1b+0uEiCbYrCDS4j+a4yA JzvVkllqfgfEXpAQdvPJV4+C1Z6XmJbcDm7Mlg9YUbJttXDlPEBdtk5ACrLMtVsvj6Hl ETckjpqsJOTDTBzbBpqznkDeHf+c5QOnsoRAs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=LiUED/Oz7XhLVm1FxsSGfM/f+MZqGcjemAmqYt4gloonUcbnnREbs/ZZQoFGQKly12 FaMMC4ybDp0wbMie/Ys2v7ci6iLAEKZO1tjBroiEDhwUL3V3J43TuGJj93lX+nI5KiPl TxEQuD7fMsRay7E6fNMx2Vn+09A7/FM7wxzlc= Received: by 10.227.209.207 with SMTP id gh15mr1653668wbb.207.1292726272335; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 18:37:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f35sm1538680wbf.14.2010.12.18.18.37.48 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 18 Dec 2010 18:37:51 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 02:37:46 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101219023746.04a4cc3f@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <4d0d694c.MNCBc7X1IUIwLwvi%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <4d0d694c.MNCBc7X1IUIwLwvi%perryh@pluto.rain.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.22.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: where are the handbooks? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 02:37:54 -0000 On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 18:09:16 -0800 perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > Which of the 8.1-RELEASE distribution sets contains the handbook, > developer's handbook, porter's handbook, etc? I thought I had > searched everywhere, but must have missed something. Those distributions were a mystery to me the first time I installed FreeBSD and they still are. I've never understood why anyone would want to lump together significant ports installation with minor base-system penny-pinching in such an opaque way. In recent versions of sysinstall the documentation is packaged, so IIWY I'd just install the appropriate port or package. $ ls -d /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-* /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-all /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-ja /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-bn /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-mn /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-da /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-nl /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-de /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-pl /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-el /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-pt /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-en /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-ru /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-es /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-sr /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-fr /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-tr /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-hu /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-zh_cn /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-it /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-zh_tw From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 19 04:36:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED3B9106564A for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 04:36:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8DCD8FC1A for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 04:36:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.193]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3FF45C21 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 14:40:59 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4D0D8AEA.2070309@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 14:32:42 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101119 Thunderbird/3.0.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Realtime X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 04:36:10 -0000 I can't seem to get my head on straight with the realtime scheduling in FBSD despite all my googling. Can someone give me a pointer to the latest info? As far as I can tell FBSD has it, but only root(?) can use it? I'm interested in who can use it, and how to allow a user to obtain the realtime access. Cheers From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 19 05:12:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E447106564A for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 05:12:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CFF88FC0C for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 05:12:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id oBJ5CoFs014606 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sat, 18 Dec 2010 21:12:50 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id oBJ5Coav014605; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 21:12:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA14411; Sat, 18 Dec 10 21:11:49 PST Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 21:11:21 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: rwmaillists@googlemail.com Message-Id: <4d0d93f9.bMGjvP62vTTOjucy%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <4d0d694c.MNCBc7X1IUIwLwvi%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <20101219023746.04a4cc3f@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20101219023746.04a4cc3f@gumby.homeunix.com> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: where are the handbooks? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 05:12:51 -0000 RW wrote: > On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 18:09:16 -0800 > perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > > Which of the 8.1-RELEASE distribution sets contains the handbook, > > developer's handbook, porter's handbook, etc? > Those distributions were a mystery to me the first time I installed > FreeBSD and they still are. I've never understood why anyone would > want to lump together significant ports installation with minor > base-system penny-pinching in such an opaque way. > ... the documentation is packaged ... > $ ls -d /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-* > /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-all /usr/ports/misc/freebsd-doc-ja > ... Thanks. It would never have occurred to me to look for documentation of the _base_ system in a _port_. The porter's handbook, maybe, but the others? Seems to me like a POLA violation. Anyway, problem solved after fetching the package. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 19 06:27:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C38291065673 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 06:27:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@penx.com) Received: from Elmer.dco.penx.com (elmer.dco.penx.com [174.46.214.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 986228FC12 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 06:27:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by Elmer.dco.penx.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBJ6R64u067793; Sat, 18 Dec 2010 23:27:07 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from freebsd@penx.com) Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 23:27:06 -0700 (MST) From: Dennis Glatting X-X-Sender: dennisg@Elmer.dco.penx.com To: Tijl Coosemans In-Reply-To: <201012181346.00732.tijl@coosemans.org> Message-ID: References: <201012181346.00732.tijl@coosemans.org> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /usr/include/machine/endian.h:123: syntax error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 06:27:36 -0000 On Sat, 18 Dec 2010, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Thursday 16 December 2010 07:49:41 Dennis Glatting wrote: >> >> While compiling a port... >> >> >> btw> uname -a >> FreeBSD btw 8.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.2-PRERELEASE #55: Sat Dec 11 22:48:59 >> PST 2010 root@btw:/usr/src/sys/amd64/compile/BTW amd64 >> >> >> >> btw# portupgrade devel/libgdata >> >> >> >> GISCAN gdata/GData-0.0.gir >> /usr/include/machine/endian.h:123: syntax error, unexpected '{' in ' >> return (__extension__ ({ register __uint64_t __X = (_x); __asm ("bswap %0" >> : "+r" (__X)); __X; }));' at '{' > > I couldn't reproduce this. Do you have any special CFLAGS perhaps? > Not intentionally: btw# cat /etc/make.conf USA_RESIDENT= YES FORCE_PKG_REGISTER= YES HAVE_MOTIF= YES WITHOUT_PERL_MALLOC= YES WITH_THREADS= YES WITHOUT_SAMBA= YES WITHOUT_LDAP= YES WITHOUT_NLS= YES OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f10 OVERRIDE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS=f10 WITH_TCL_VER=85 SENDMAIL_CFLAGS=-I/usr/local/include/sasl -DSASL SENDMAIL_LDFLAGS=-L/usr/local/lib SENDMAIL_LDADD=-lsasl2 # added by use.perl 2010-12-15 20:47:32 PERL_VERSION=5.12.2 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 19 12:52:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3755F1065696 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 12:52:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCFDE8FC16 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 12:52:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.193]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BAE45C21 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 22:57:24 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4D0DFF44.5090409@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 22:49:08 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101119 Thunderbird/3.0.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4D0D8AEA.2070309@herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-Reply-To: <4D0D8AEA.2070309@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: FBSD Realtime X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 12:52:34 -0000 In light of the significant spam of late, it occurs to me that my former subject line may have been a little sparse... :) On 12/19/10 14:32, Da Rock wrote: > I can't seem to get my head on straight with the realtime scheduling > in FBSD despite all my googling. Can someone give me a pointer to the > latest info? As far as I can tell FBSD has it, but only root(?) can > use it? > > I'm interested in who can use it, and how to allow a user to obtain > the realtime access. > > Cheers > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 19 13:20:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9128106564A for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:20:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 797C78FC0C for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:20:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so2011432wyf.13 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 05:20:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+VWxDtxVlNFGMa1TEHbTLFAeAv/GC6wANZl38Abc6To=; b=CmshERC+3pGAWn1NRJ8/Gj8d4O48oD8WBo3zEAdeCSLM7KXXPU8wNAfBLcdFNHF0JY NECH1IOKC2fAk/uWVRFgC2XCwnssUX2dk4KLZQD71WXuWVIb+OcsWfJW45gT/n0XvVnZ fSWWEEoeahHAPPQ/4hfKrRCJ3E59Qj0KZzeuw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=aTdJ2XKlVcG4QewDY72Ciax2m3C/1E9r/IKrOGyDxeJnSM2G7o2SKOuctZQC4C9rY2 puaAl0KZf9p/mznZE/qmrlV0+fsjfI03dHC12BA3mpax1Cok1Il1JVRDwQ5kOK+emGnB E6sjYg8LGoTJB4cXvaPeYbg8/ovSlQAl7SG4k= Received: by 10.227.136.15 with SMTP id p15mr1905050wbt.134.1292764854316; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 05:20:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m13sm1861809wbz.21.2010.12.19.05.20.52 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 19 Dec 2010 05:20:53 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:20:49 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101219132049.12544c37@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <4d0d93f9.bMGjvP62vTTOjucy%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <4d0d694c.MNCBc7X1IUIwLwvi%perryh@pluto.rain.com> <20101219023746.04a4cc3f@gumby.homeunix.com> <4d0d93f9.bMGjvP62vTTOjucy%perryh@pluto.rain.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.22.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: where are the handbooks? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:20:56 -0000 On Sat, 18 Dec 2010 21:11:21 -0800 perryh@pluto.rain.com wrote: > Thanks. It would never have occurred to me to look for documentation > of the _base_ system in a _port_. The porter's handbook, maybe, but > the others? Seems to me like a POLA violation. The documentation isn't really a part of the base system, it isn't branched, it's continuously updated, it's similar to the ports tree. Older install disks had a snapshot. Having a port/package that installs the snapshot makes it a lot easier to keep up to date. You used to have to use csup to fetch the "source" files and then build the html, pdf, etc which used a lot of CPU. I gave up on it and synced the html version from the website - a port is better. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 19 13:38:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5415106566C for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:38:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from spamrefuse@yahoo.com) Received: from web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8DBDD8FC15 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:38:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 63402 invoked by uid 60001); 19 Dec 2010 13:11:58 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1292764318; bh=Qo/jPasBJNnKY3ubLtge7EoUiLLVDcj9X44KXG0+S+k=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=4qR7T1ShrR44ro6Cky0GKe+6hbd62eufTgtPCLZEbQ4NSTKBsJUXAR7svSJd/2WV/9/mIH8cO6VxYnF9vRCexM9A/DgjUwJ+t+t8YEV1Pd32jMgW2OBoBpYWMvTRRw002nD+JKX/VGvzg7LkF5jzjz2Nt08sq4dTk24wvdHEHz8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=bKmGnf5os4J/KWD7bjC7r55gm8xLsm1Gb6rUH6mPIJZapxnJzCUzWk19tVq2KDSfSSPbol9HA1rh0flkusCeOqwZquXkbnoO4OR1AGtxjXTYMisDJe1IYu9uo10J6Q8Ld8lTS/wYDu94S83GOHFHXGSO4700Cy0UfS+D75LQG8E=; Message-ID: <806473.50556.qm@web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: ZhkLTW8VM1mTBCG_K1eMc75EUeCD5azX6ldWWCecS174hDs 2USx2_hnUNyGuQo0xNMEH7MJYEHh6fYT0Y1d.LxcynQ2.lFz19dGqT8SKg_1 07x1Ysb2Q9PVas7hb5lo_XzXRlbsphELFk0EUKO1qdxpEzYmGd_bsryec0.l XvB9_tCOt0N7euQ99zu9lZjjcRw17OFgit8lT7Em1hUDIufqZFVOTFTD9Qua O7hpgbQOKV9Q4HhHbhO8H3SCpyQX3qhuG69JQOeNsg1W9Fjv4q_vwTPvzskb J95Fu5jvR0IUTPlemd7k1jmtJgZZgmf5Mg.HtuMM.Mmop4E9p4vaqKfd_F0r 56roPmj1P11wO4RiZhsXC0EM3p.dHeb2YW6Meh97abHeg3t5KtQ6ml9Ydbwu 8SUmIn_DIEGNg Received: from [111.118.62.73] by web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 05:11:58 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/553 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 05:11:58 -0800 (PST) From: Rob To: FreeBSD questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: FBSD 8: custom kernel config ends boot at "mountroot>". Plz. help! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:38:40 -0000 Hi, My system boots fine with the GENERIC kernel on FreeBSD 8.0 I made a custom kernel, but the boot process then ends with the mountroot> error and prompt. Apparently something is wrong with my kernel config file. Can somebody check it below and tell me what is wrong with my kernel config file? Especially the GEOM_PART_* at the end might be the culprit, although this configuration used to work for 7.3. Thank you! Rob. # My kernel config file: cpu I686_CPU ident MYKERNEL options SCHED_ULE # ULE scheduler options PREEMPTION # Enable kernel thread preemption options INET # InterNETworking options INET6 # IPv6 communications protocols options SCTP # Stream Control Transmission Protocol options FFS # Berkeley Fast Filesystem options SOFTUPDATES # Enable FFS soft updates support options UFS_ACL # Support for access control lists options UFS_DIRHASH # Improve performance on big directories options COMPAT_FREEBSD7 # Compatible with FreeBSD7 options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING # POSIX P1003_1B real-time extensions options KBD_INSTALL_CDEV # install a CDEV entry in /dev device pci device ata device atadisk # ATA disk drives options ATA_STATIC_ID # Static device numbering device scbus # SCSI bus (required for SCSI) device da # Direct Access (disks) device pass # Passthrough device (direct SCSI access) device atkbdc # AT keyboard controller device atkbd # AT keyboard device psm # PS/2 mouse device vga # VGA video card driver device splash # Splash screen and screen saver support device sc device pmtimer device loop # Network loopback device ether # Ethernet support device pty # BSD-style compatibility pseudo ttys device md # Memory "disks" device bpf # Berkeley packet filter options SC_DISABLE_REBOOT options DEVICE_POLLING options HZ=1000 nodevice mem nodevice io nodevice uart_ns8250 nooptions GEOM_PART_BSD nooptions GEOM_PART_EBR nooptions GEOM_PART_EBR_COMPAT nooptions GEOM_PART_MBR From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 19 13:42:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F25C1106564A for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:42:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 828458FC08 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:42:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so1984018wwf.31 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 05:41:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4CEKbRsddxKVl/i10BDFYSUBTaz6blM1K4dMWxp0tRE=; b=v/8qCQF3akX6TFJLALNTXFLwMyHltcn+XB3eUa8dDbYiAXsLAEBrLalvBCDMXtHDSL 7njryjgi6Vbqh4YRGyqnXivGvEc3ZVRRQt3nCwYwBSh65hfnFa4ccs8eNTOcnmCRq4r9 LVdnSm9cBFE9QoPp3zOfkCQ1vDyAWt4hLlx8U= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=SUNF1LGvlKjncFajN59amwiK6QBC+KjonXbM3r/AH3bj/rcTg+NhZHTHdXJ/bf98hN EDRkhn1NzAilWsVkWpRZNQyvSME+dMV+I4GWpe5VNk2cOs6P/2kvRdmt1YoUOdPoeEx8 ncNOdSJ+bP/z4kwVkwtF+D8BXKVddbQ+TdzyI= Received: by 10.227.155.75 with SMTP id r11mr1977766wbw.3.1292766119107; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 05:41:59 -0800 (PST) Received: from Melon.malikania.fr (65.21.102-84.rev.gaoland.net [84.102.21.65]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 11sm1879506wbi.6.2010.12.19.05.41.56 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 19 Dec 2010 05:41:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D0E0B9E.5000505@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 14:41:50 +0100 From: David Demelier User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101212 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon References: <4D065DE0.2020509@gmail.com> <20101213232917.70fc36f6.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20101213232917.70fc36f6.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unable to extract audio cd tracks X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:42:01 -0000 On 13/12/2010 23:29, Polytropon wrote: > On Mon, 13 Dec 2010 18:54:40 +0100, David Demelier wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Reading this http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/creating-cds.html I >> would try to extract my files from my optical drive. (I don't have >> atapicam but if I understand well it's only needed for cdda2wav) >> >> markand@Abricot ~ $ sudo dd if=/dev/acd0t01 of=track1.cdr >> dd: /dev/acd0t01: Invalid argument >> 0+0 records in >> 0+0 records out >> 0 bytes transferred in 0.026221 secs (0 bytes/sec) >> >> do I really need atapicam even if I directly read from the device? > > You need to specify the correct block size: > > dd if=/dev/acd0t01 of=track01.cdr bs=2352 > > This should give you a cdr (raw) file conforming to > the CD audio specifications. > > Thanks, The handbook says we must `taste' the media, it works but it prints a warning markand@Melon ~ $ dd if=/dev/acd0 of=/dev/null count=1 dd: /dev/acd0: Invalid argument 0+0 records in 0+0 records out 0 bytes transferred in 0.000132 secs (0 bytes/sec) I just realized that using the block size for the same thing works : markand@Melon ~ $ dd if=/dev/acd0 of=/dev/null count=1 bs=2352 1+0 records in 1+0 records out 2352 bytes transferred in 2.893379 secs (813 bytes/sec) I propose modifying the following : http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/creating-cds.html Make sure the appropriate files exist in /dev. If the entries are missing, force the system to retaste the media: # dd if=/dev/acd0 of=/dev/null count=1 *bs=2352 Then people who try that won't be surprised by the Invalid argument error. Cheers, From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 19 13:57:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEBC1106566B for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:57:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com (mail-ww0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8120A8FC08 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:57:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwi17 with SMTP id 17so2025909wwi.1 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 05:57:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=kBKpcnFavtOngtEB4KGgWS8+Hp5D5RPAGQ8i+A1N5NM=; b=cGC3Rn41tNvo57gLYBImb8mZ6AWrHoUuqcVzYY7VK4B2kNS8zalVuA9ENI5M36qGSS DrFf/sBXFsuQ46z8NyGgyAs11XJUojiwYnzrAsZJ7P/Tp2b/NypVyzE3zIruC9iOhVkb AqrlUcIi3cQ+Dxi86tVNoCReRJBg01JkvbxiI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=T10sdw/TeOSijZqhCF7NN2kismajIPiLUNukUIGkRZ/0ux+wiLPSLdqEJOHc1Ch6Q9 QSNpYk1hb8v9n6cqMMFK09Gbt3J7OxvqoGGVSQFkDOWVUnLIwE8L9oQsCMVGu3nWyS35 70cNwd8iT5XgwtR/KYntOusLe/2xkmDry6nVA= Received: by 10.216.59.193 with SMTP id s43mr3276963wec.42.1292767037986; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 05:57:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j58sm1290041wes.21.2010.12.19.05.57.15 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 19 Dec 2010 05:57:16 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:57:12 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101219135712.08374097@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <4D0D8AEA.2070309@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <4D0D8AEA.2070309@herveybayaustralia.com.au> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.22.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Realtime X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:57:20 -0000 On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 14:32:42 +1000 Da Rock wrote: > I can't seem to get my head on straight with the realtime scheduling > in FBSD despite all my googling. Can someone give me a pointer to the > latest info? As far as I can tell FBSD has it, but only root(?) can > use it? > > I'm interested in who can use it, and how to allow a user to obtain > the realtime access. see rtprio(1). It has to be run as root so you would probably want use sudo. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 19 14:41:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17DBC106564A for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 14:41:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC3D58FC13 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 14:41:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-37-207.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.37.207]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 262861E7A3; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 15:41:21 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id oBJEfLKc001464; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 15:41:21 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 15:41:21 +0100 From: Polytropon To: David Demelier Message-Id: <20101219154121.99640f62.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <4D0E0B9E.5000505@gmail.com> References: <4D065DE0.2020509@gmail.com> <20101213232917.70fc36f6.freebsd@edvax.de> <4D0E0B9E.5000505@gmail.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unable to extract audio cd tracks X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 14:41:24 -0000 On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 14:41:50 +0100, David Demelier wrote: > Thanks, > > The handbook says we must `taste' the media, it works but it prints a > warning > > markand@Melon ~ $ dd if=/dev/acd0 of=/dev/null count=1 > dd: /dev/acd0: Invalid argument > 0+0 records in > 0+0 records out > 0 bytes transferred in 0.000132 secs (0 bytes/sec) > > I just realized that using the block size for the same thing works : > > markand@Melon ~ $ dd if=/dev/acd0 of=/dev/null count=1 bs=2352 > 1+0 records in > 1+0 records out > 2352 bytes transferred in 2.893379 secs (813 bytes/sec) > > I propose modifying the following : > > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/creating-cds.html > > Make sure the appropriate files exist in /dev. If the entries are > missing, force the system to retaste the media: > > # dd if=/dev/acd0 of=/dev/null count=1 *bs=2352 > > Then people who try that won't be surprised by the Invalid argument error. A good idea - again one step into the right direction of providing high-quality documentation. In fact, I have never needed to "taste" the media in my extraction scripts, but I now do realize WHY: Before using dd bs=2352 to get the data, I did cdcontrol -f /dev/acd0 info which prints out the TOC of the audio CD and, I assume, makes sure the corresponding /dev/acd0tNN track files get created; cdcontrol is part of the base system so it should be possible to rely on its presence, at least on FreeBSD. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 19 14:48:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C29A21065675 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 14:48:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51F0D8FC17 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 14:48:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so2050875wyf.13 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 06:48:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QJX9Y6zvwDZtsHQgKTAzy41f86JEKN1IIxFaN1De52k=; b=wS8LVJTQm1hkYOkj9LMCVWBnqt5HXi3c3VrlDqHLpc/GGPoKbZGDvJxKoImdlPMolV dslAHz8vRqw4KJ3qeaojQnKh1K6j79F/vcXm4uy+n3pQkPMfqOsH5MoDQdsWE3zQeIHt f3pdrLdXCx/nFcLcZsQqosEuiAx2YuLCT+BJU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=E8zEfNO4xtRg+x2l9vPaAPDGIilzXz2O1cSRMPlNkiehp9PDR/gqCcU1y07QeuB+Qs XS5JwjbSXE9bk6ZNCfF6+COVA7igUD6uPGyb0OY+NHXyW+mZ/POKnkdz+IQStizd916I UutGlsO21n74OhJfMsnT5ZpFMNfzHY5f0KdSQ= Received: by 10.227.152.71 with SMTP id f7mr1947661wbw.144.1292770088788; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 06:48:08 -0800 (PST) Received: from Melon.malikania.fr (65.21.102-84.rev.gaoland.net [84.102.21.65]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id m10sm1912363wbc.22.2010.12.19.06.48.06 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 19 Dec 2010 06:48:07 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4D0E1B22.8080301@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 15:48:02 +0100 From: David Demelier User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101212 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Polytropon References: <4D065DE0.2020509@gmail.com> <20101213232917.70fc36f6.freebsd@edvax.de> <4D0E0B9E.5000505@gmail.com> <20101219154121.99640f62.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20101219154121.99640f62.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Unable to extract audio cd tracks X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 14:48:10 -0000 On 19/12/2010 15:41, Polytropon wrote: > On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 14:41:50 +0100, David Demelier wrote: >> Thanks, >> >> The handbook says we must `taste' the media, it works but it prints a >> warning >> >> markand@Melon ~ $ dd if=/dev/acd0 of=/dev/null count=1 >> dd: /dev/acd0: Invalid argument >> 0+0 records in >> 0+0 records out >> 0 bytes transferred in 0.000132 secs (0 bytes/sec) >> >> I just realized that using the block size for the same thing works : >> >> markand@Melon ~ $ dd if=/dev/acd0 of=/dev/null count=1 bs=2352 >> 1+0 records in >> 1+0 records out >> 2352 bytes transferred in 2.893379 secs (813 bytes/sec) >> >> I propose modifying the following : >> >> http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/creating-cds.html >> >> Make sure the appropriate files exist in /dev. If the entries are >> missing, force the system to retaste the media: >> >> # dd if=/dev/acd0 of=/dev/null count=1 *bs=2352 >> >> Then people who try that won't be surprised by the Invalid argument error. > > A good idea - again one step into the right direction > of providing high-quality documentation. > > In fact, I have never needed to "taste" the media in my > extraction scripts, but I now do realize WHY: Before using > dd bs=2352 to get the data, I did > > cdcontrol -f /dev/acd0 info > > which prints out the TOC of the audio CD and, I assume, > makes sure the corresponding /dev/acd0tNN track files > get created; cdcontrol is part of the base system so it > should be possible to rely on its presence, at least on > FreeBSD. > I didn't know this one! I think it's even better to use that, it prints information on every tracks. Cheers, From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 19 17:19:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E53F106564A for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 17:19:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rg.lists@rzweb.com) Received: from flabnapple.net (flabnapple.net [216.129.104.99]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F344D8FC08 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 17:19:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.flabnapple.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by flabnapple.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 886B81CC04A for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:03:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 09:03:37 -0800 From: "Ron (Lists)" To: Message-ID: X-Sender: rg.lists@rzweb.com User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.4 Subject: Portmaster recursion problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 17:19:33 -0000 I recently switched from using portupgrade to portmaster and am having an odd problem upgrading. When I run 'portmaster apache' I get this recursion problem: ===>>> Port directory: /usr/ports/www/apache22 ===>>> Starting check for build dependencies ===>>> Gathering dependency list for www/apache22 from ports ===>>> Launching child to update devel/autoconf devel/autoconf >> perl-5.8.9_3 >> apache-2.2.17 >> devel/autoconf >> perl-5.8.9_3 >> apache-2.2.17 >> devel/autoconf >> perl-5.8.9_3 >> apache-2.2.17 >> devel/autoconf >> perl-5.8.9_3 >> apache-2.2.17 >> devel/autoconf >> perl-5.8.9_3 >> apache-2.2.17 >> devel/autoconf >> perl-5.8.9_3 >> apache-2.2.17 >> devel/autoconf >> perl-5.8.9_3 >> apache-2.2.17 >> devel/autoconf This just keeps going and going. I've tried upgrading other ports and they all do the same thing (with slightly different packages). What is very weird is the dependencies. For example, I run 'portmaster nano' and I get: ===>>> The following actions will be taken if you choose to proceed: Upgrade nano-2.2.5 to nano-2.2.6 Upgrade apache-2.2.17 to apache-2.2.17_1 Install devel/autoconf Upgrade autoconf-wrapper-20071109 to autoconf-wrapper-20101119 Upgrade perl-5.8.9_3 to perl-5.8.9_4 Install devel/libtool Upgrade openssl-1.0.0_2 to openssl-1.0.0_4 I'm not sure why nano is dependent on apache? This leads me to wonder is something is messed up in my dependencies, and if so, how do I fix it? I'd love to go back to using portupgrade, but it seems it is not longer maintained or functional (this reason I switched to portmaster). Thanks, Ron From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 19 17:43:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AA471065674 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 17:43:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 827628FC1C for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 17:43:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBJHgX2l045305 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 17:42:33 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk oBJHgX2l045305 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1292780553; bh=YQXNx7N3sO+fcwKS3UdLzmINtQsnjQwsR7VC8hEoqEg=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4D0E4401.5060602@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20S un,=2019=20Dec=202010=2017:42:25=20+0000|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0=20(M acintosh=3B=20U=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B=20en-US=3B=20r v:1.9.2.13)=20Gecko/20101207=20Thunderbird/3.1.7|MIME-Version:=201 .0|To:=20freebsd-questions@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20Portmaster =20recursion=20problem|References:=20|In-Reply-To:=20|X-Enigmail-Version:=201.1.1|OpenPGP:=20id=3D60 AE908C|Content-Type:=20multipart/signed=3B=20micalg=3Dpgp-sha1=3B= 0D=0A=20protocol=3D"application/pgp-signature"=3B=0D=0A=20boundary =3D"------------enigD6D38BA5FA591C5851692A0D"; b=Bx7Jv5NWIszXRqWLxVd/nWuL/MlT2ReqoH1NfvwxbWRJm6zqHJcPL432hHOzp+5Z9 StUOm2AK0YkzrEXKHnSaQRj9coH9tcz3HnLjjCfXf4wm90N6BYNcpRvovf47jboON6 VZMrYKB2VMSPdckqhKF0Jt87oiUAJ0+UZLLgkDkI= Message-ID: <4D0E4401.5060602@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 17:42:25 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigD6D38BA5FA591C5851692A0D" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.5 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: Portmaster recursion problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 17:43:36 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigD6D38BA5FA591C5851692A0D Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 19/12/2010 17:03, Ron (Lists) wrote: > =3D=3D=3D>>> Launching child to update devel/autoconf > devel/autoconf >> perl-5.8.9_3 >> apache-2.2.17 >> devel/autoconf >= > > perl-5.8.9_3 >> apache-2.2.17 >> devel/autoconf >> perl-5.8.9_3 >> > apache-2.2.17 >> devel/autoconf >> perl-5.8.9_3 >> apache-2.2.17 >> > devel/autoconf >> perl-5.8.9_3 >> apache-2.2.17 >> devel/autoconf >> > perl-5.8.9_3 >> apache-2.2.17 >> devel/autoconf >> perl-5.8.9_3 >> > apache-2.2.17 >> devel/autoconf >=20 > This just keeps going and going. I've tried upgrading other ports and > they all do the same thing (with slightly different packages). This is a classic symptom of putting USE_FOO into a Makefile with global scope -- typically /etc/make.conf Don't do that. USE_FOO flags are for port maintainers to use in port specific Makefiles. They do things like make the port have a dependency on apache. Which is no good if you apply it to /every/ /single/ /port/ in the tree, and particularly bad when its a port that apache itself depends on, as you end up with a dependency loop. Dependency loops are (in Ghostbusters parlance) like crossing the streams. Anyone generating dependency loops deserves to be pelted with stay-puft marshmallow, at the very least. Instead, you want to use a WITH_FOO variable, or a WANT_FOO variable. These are intended as user servicable parts. For apache, that would be something like the following to make www/apache22 the default apache port= : WITH_APACHE2=3D yes APACHE_PORT=3D www/apache22 Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigD6D38BA5FA591C5851692A0D Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk0ORAkACgkQ8Mjk52CukIxU9QCgksV9pLukmunFd5XBpVUYyDkZ fI4AnR4EwTaEOouGLeZFMiFlRID8sMnU =J/+C -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigD6D38BA5FA591C5851692A0D-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 19 17:57:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B915106566C for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 17:57:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jack@jarasoft.net) Received: from smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DF7B8FC14 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 17:57:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from raats.xs4all.nl (raats.xs4all.nl [82.95.230.43]) by smtp-vbr1.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oBJHvfRG091220 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 18:57:41 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jack@jarasoft.net) Received: from raats.xs4all.nl (orac.jarasoft.net [10.10.10.10]) by raats.xs4all.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C7DD3D756C for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 18:57:41 +0100 (CET) Received: from jarasc430 (raats.xs4all.nl [82.95.230.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by raats.xs4all.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E2A883D7427 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 18:57:40 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <8D95166BBED547ED9FA402C05ED53B7E@jarasc430> From: "Jack Raats" To: Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 18:57:39 +0100 Organization: JaRaSoft, Steenbergen, Nederland MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5994 X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 20:07:28 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Strange error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Jack Raats List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 17:57:43 -0000 I have a strange error. Normally when you compile the complete system, the first line of = /etc/motd is being adjusted telling you the time and version you just = compiled. On one server this is not being done. What is the problem. Which programm adjust the motd file when compiling? Thanks Jack From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 19 20:16:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F3EB106566B for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 20:16:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62CA58FC1A for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 20:16:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-37-207.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.37.207]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB8463D62F; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 21:16:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id oBJKG2u3002822; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 21:16:03 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 21:16:02 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Jack Raats Message-Id: <20101219211602.6bec4b96.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <8D95166BBED547ED9FA402C05ED53B7E@jarasc430> References: <8D95166BBED547ED9FA402C05ED53B7E@jarasc430> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Strange error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 20:16:05 -0000 On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 18:57:39 +0100, "Jack Raats" wrote: > I have a strange error. > > Normally when you compile the complete system, the first line > of /etc/motd is being adjusted telling you the time and version > you just compiled. > On one server this is not being done. > What is the problem. Which programm adjust the motd file when compiling? As far as I remember, this update is not part of the compiling process, but will be performed later on as a startup procedure. I just checked; have a look at /etc/rc.d/motd and the corresponding update_motd= setting for /etc/rc.conf. The rc script basically is a search & replace mechanism that obtains the current version from a uname call. In your case, check if the one server in question does have update_motd="NO" set. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 19 20:37:37 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF09F106564A for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 20:37:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul@wcclan.net) Received: from mail.wcclan.net (unknown [IPv6:2001:888:1413:0:3811:9144:1f79:d994]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1817A8FC16 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 20:37:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from haggis.wcclan.net ([fe80::3811:9144:1f79:d994]) by haggis.wcclan.net ([fe80::3811:9144:1f79:d994%10]) with mapi; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 21:37:31 +0100 From: Paul Koene To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 21:37:30 +0100 Thread-Topic: IPv6 Unkown header extension Thread-Index: AQHLn7yOb8oGXr+hl06RhMbmcsjsLA== Message-ID: <5847A22B570A294AA4EC8C92C02F1D2E011D02F8B82C@haggis.wcclan.net> Accept-Language: nl-NL Content-Language: nl-NL X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: nl-NL Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: IPv6 Unkown header extension X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 20:37:37 -0000 L.S., every once in a while I see the following messages filling the logs on my F= reeBSD installations: IPFW2: IPV6 - Unknown Extension Header(128), ext_hd=3D0 I am somewhat curious why this message occurs. Did I configure something wr= ong, Is there an implementation defect in an existing ipv6 stack that these= packets try to abuse or is this part of an OS fingerprinting technique or = something? Kind regards, Paul Koene= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 19 21:28:29 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41AF0106564A for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 21:28:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f48.google.com (mail-bw0-f48.google.com [209.85.214.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C41888FC08 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 21:28:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so2319172bwz.7 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:28:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:reply-to :in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BzJqXGAnID/WwAKSc4BHbtTmZykvyBwgIJRpQTV+Dqo=; b=Ghq/rJSXaglAos+rcMwQ/XQoRi6Y43sy6mnin8WVa0PGcaGvPnbo+ir+qiruxWP34/ vWXh1z0O9s5kqc7K837n6GmxcKdt2TinKwpzbT1mZKe0DJHsBwYAiBYejMQJQqwN/xQc WiOOdUyq5QTS9B8LpWPpE3YcWe0JCuIcVQx0Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=sfs3klLAzBIV/Zaf6O3Rp27nXPqXdWPvRtjL0BOnEOjmhXvjQnlAS0klYWYXl0IlRC Hfx4H6eYytid3zjKf8FfHgKjknjiFAJRKe3hKK7Pzihk9JFznnXuO/OWtJKcUN8dVk+q x5DlFnI7baektJbdbeCFYn1OgeiCO38QgWP64= Received: by 10.204.122.17 with SMTP id j17mr331583bkr.4.1292794106267; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:28:26 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.52.19 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 13:27:56 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <243777.40357.qm@web121603.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <243777.40357.qm@web121603.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> From: Chris Rees Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 21:27:56 +0000 Message-ID: To: Ez Javachat Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Website Feedback X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: utisoft@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 21:28:29 -0000 On 19 December 2010 17:32, Ez Javachat wrote: > Hello, > =A0 We love Free BSD.. is there any way that you can add a live chat room= on the website so that developers a like can chat live?=A0 Our java irc cl= ient is located at ezjavachat.com and our servers all run Free BSD!=A0 It's= very simple to add the chatroom... just copy and paste the html code into = your website.=A0 It's safe and secure!=A0 Please consider this and email ba= ck with any questions.=A0 Also, we have a team of moderators that will make= sure the chatroom is under control 24/7!=A0 Thanks. > > Very Respectfully, > Matt Hi Matt, There's already a 'chat room' set up, but there are a few different ones, listed here: http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/support.html#IRC Hope that helps, Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 20 01:49:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F702106566C for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 01:49:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamesbrandongooch@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03D9C8FC12 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 01:49:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so2309733wwf.31 for ; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 17:49:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=v4E7KvOkg/2ZeWOFvxXJcYHhYvlPmlIAkVHOc3LiyeU=; b=tO62eFmdbb6cNchyzKXdCZYVAfShoJcJUMVvdBtWv6lSzDJVlLMnvM0QaC4JCDlyjg TnKu5bnJkHN3ohmzxjllrC2fPi8ftfcOAyF74BRWwnQe0PylxeAgUrHncIdAaOT1CkuF 8jaqw/TPC7N7er7OKXsox5vCQgsI6D6QYFjTQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=ebCGnRQAPqlkDifLg+WD9I5nF0enYu8xE8Jl3WvzSFEmv2Sqp/+nIagoGynoyo6sQk EoE5XdeRTv/ZGngIijlMc9JsYBLWEYVqDrVqnn8oYFx2mjqPE9aq01KEkmPyJDkaFkZn tMgpcNWOyXyyY3lzdO4hlNkQhczyLuG74AnXI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.170.133 with SMTP id p5mr3982355wel.89.1292809748917; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 17:49:08 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.12.80 with HTTP; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 17:49:08 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D0DFF44.5090409@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <4D0D8AEA.2070309@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4D0DFF44.5090409@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 19:49:08 -0600 Message-ID: From: Brandon Gooch To: Da Rock Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FBSD Realtime X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 01:49:10 -0000 On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 6:49 AM, Da Rock wrote: > In light of the significant spam of late, it occurs to me that my former > subject line may have been a little sparse... :) > > On 12/19/10 14:32, Da Rock wrote: >> >> I can't seem to get my head on straight with the realtime scheduling in >> FBSD despite all my googling. Can someone give me a pointer to the latest >> info? As far as I can tell FBSD has it, but only root(?) can use it? >> >> I'm interested in who can use it, and how to allow a user to obtain the >> realtime access. There's an ongoing discussion/debate between two very knowledgeable and talented developers (plus a supporting cast) regarding the real-time support in FreeBSD; it's happening on freebsd-arch@: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2010-December/010835.html I suggest giving it a read if you are planning on deploying some real-time process (or are interested in reading about FreeBSD internals from some very knowledgeable people). -Brandon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 20 02:01:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD03B106564A for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 02:01:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (agora.rdrop.com [IPv6:2607:f678:1010::34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC1AE8FC17 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 02:01:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from agora.rdrop.com (66@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.7) with ESMTP id oBK21HDm084952 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Sun, 19 Dec 2010 18:01:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from perryh@pluto.rain.com) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by agora.rdrop.com (8.13.1/8.12.9/Submit) with UUCP id oBK21HDX084951; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 18:01:17 -0800 (PST) Received: from fbsd61 by pluto.rain.com (4.1/SMI-4.1-pluto-M2060407) id AA17389; Sun, 19 Dec 10 17:49:01 PST Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 17:48:31 -0800 From: perryh@pluto.rain.com To: spamrefuse@yahoo.com Message-Id: <4d0eb5ef.NcuGvGSx/T7mW5LL%perryh@pluto.rain.com> References: <806473.50556.qm@web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <806473.50556.qm@web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> User-Agent: nail 11.25 7/29/05 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FBSD 8: custom kernel config ends boot at "mountroot>". Plz. help! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 02:01:17 -0000 Rob wrote: > My system boots fine with the GENERIC kernel on FreeBSD 8.0 > I made a custom kernel, but the boot process then ends with the > mountroot> > error and prompt. One thing to try is entering ? there, to produce a list of recognized filesystems. Comparing that list with what you expected might provide a clue. Another possibility would be to compare the dmesg from your kernel with the one from GENERIC. > Apparently something is wrong with my kernel config file. > > Can somebody check it below and tell me what is wrong with my > kernel config file? Especially the GEOM_PART_* at the end might > be the culprit, although this configuration used to work for 7.3. Supposing the disk is partitioned with GPT (not with MBR/BSD, which you appear to be excluding) I see nothing blatantly obvious, but I am far from an expert in such matters. It might be worthwhile to check UPDATING to see if anything rings a bell, and/or compare your config file with the GENERIC one. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 20 02:32:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71A52106566B for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 02:32:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank@esperance-linux.co.uk) Received: from asmtp5.iomartmail.com (asmtp5.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 033588FC13 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 02:32:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from asmtp5.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp5.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oBK2W53N011022; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 02:32:05 GMT Received: from orange.esperance-linux.co.uk (80-45-152-196.static.dsl.as9105.com [80.45.152.196]) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp5.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oBK2W5fE011018; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 02:32:05 GMT Received: by orange.esperance-linux.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 05C9D33C1F; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 02:32:05 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 02:32:05 +0000 From: Frank Shute To: Rob Message-ID: <20101220023205.GA75403@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> References: <806473.50556.qm@web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <806473.50556.qm@web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i X-Face: *}~{PHnDTzvXPe'wl_-f%!@+r5; VLhb':*DsX%wEOPg\fDrXWQJf|2\,92"DdS%63t*BHDyQ|OWo@Gfjcd72eaN!4%NE{0]p)ihQ1MyFNtWL X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.2-PRERELEASE amd64 X-Organisation: 'shute.org.uk' Cc: FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: FBSD 8: custom kernel config ends boot at "mountroot>". Plz. help! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Frank Shute List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 02:32:08 -0000 On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 05:11:58AM -0800, Rob wrote: > > > Hi, > > My system boots fine with the GENERIC kernel on FreeBSD 8.0 > > I made a custom kernel, but the boot process then ends with the > > mountroot> > > error and prompt. > > Apparently something is wrong with my kernel config file. > > Can somebody check it below and tell me what is wrong with my kernel config > file? Especially the GEOM_PART_* at the end might be the culprit, although this > configuration used to work for 7.3. > > Thank you! > > Rob. > > # My kernel config file: > cpu I686_CPU > ident MYKERNEL > options SCHED_ULE # ULE scheduler > options PREEMPTION # Enable kernel thread preemption > options INET # InterNETworking > options INET6 # IPv6 communications protocols > options SCTP # Stream Control Transmission Protocol > options FFS # Berkeley Fast Filesystem > options SOFTUPDATES # Enable FFS soft updates support > options UFS_ACL # Support for access control lists > options UFS_DIRHASH # Improve performance on big directories > options COMPAT_FREEBSD7 # Compatible with FreeBSD7 > options _KPOSIX_PRIORITY_SCHEDULING # POSIX P1003_1B real-time extensions > options KBD_INSTALL_CDEV # install a CDEV entry in /dev > device pci > device ata > device atadisk # ATA disk drives > options ATA_STATIC_ID # Static device numbering > device scbus # SCSI bus (required for SCSI) > device da # Direct Access (disks) > device pass # Passthrough device (direct SCSI access) > device atkbdc # AT keyboard controller > device atkbd # AT keyboard > device psm # PS/2 mouse > device vga # VGA video card driver > device splash # Splash screen and screen saver support > device sc > device pmtimer > device loop # Network loopback > device ether # Ethernet support > device pty # BSD-style compatibility pseudo ttys > device md # Memory "disks" > device bpf # Berkeley packet filter > options SC_DISABLE_REBOOT > options DEVICE_POLLING > options HZ=1000 > nodevice mem > nodevice io > nodevice uart_ns8250 > nooptions GEOM_PART_BSD > nooptions GEOM_PART_EBR > nooptions GEOM_PART_EBR_COMPAT > nooptions GEOM_PART_MBR > Rob, If you're going to use a custom kernel, copy GENERIC, edit it and save it as your kernel conf. Then when you run into trouble with your custom kernel you can post a diff(1) between it and GENERIC. Then it's easy to see what you've enabled/disabled, left-out etc. As it stands, it takes too much time for people to compare your custom kernel with GENERIC. Regards, -- Frank Contact info: http://www.shute.org.uk/misc/contact.html From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 20 03:15:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B76A106566B for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 03:15:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A8FD8FC13 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 03:15:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBK3FWgB039321; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 20:15:32 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) with ESMTP id oBK3FWaR039318; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 20:15:32 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 20:15:32 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Frank Shute In-Reply-To: <20101220023205.GA75403@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> Message-ID: References: <806473.50556.qm@web33306.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <20101220023205.GA75403@orange.esperance-linux.co.uk> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 19 Dec 2010 20:15:32 -0700 (MST) Cc: Rob , FreeBSD questions Subject: Re: FBSD 8: custom kernel config ends boot at "mountroot>". Plz. help! X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 03:15:33 -0000 On Mon, 20 Dec 2010, Frank Shute wrote: > If you're going to use a custom kernel, copy GENERIC, edit it and save > it as your kernel conf. > > Then when you run into trouble with your custom kernel you can post a > diff(1) between it and GENERIC. Then it's easy to see what you've > enabled/disabled, left-out etc. Another option is to "include GENERIC" in the new config file and use nooptions and nodevice to exclude unwanted things. Then the config file is a diff. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 20 03:16:54 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 333651065673 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 03:16:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from weif@weif.net) Received: from maxwell.cjones.org (host-69-146-226-138.chy-wy.client.bresnan.net [69.146.226.138]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A5B08FC23 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 03:16:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by maxwell.cjones.org (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 90E354A64B7; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 19:58:50 -0700 (MST) From: Keith Seyffarth To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 19:58:50 -0700 Message-ID: <8439ptgnf9.fsf@maxwell.cjones.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: use of menus crashes Firefox? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: weif@weif.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 03:16:54 -0000 After updating gtk following (and most other ports) following the instructions in UPDATING, Firefox now crashes if I click on any menu. This includes the menus such as "file," "edit," and "help" in the main menu bar as well as right-clicking or clicking a menu from an extension. So far I have tried rebooting the computer forcing reinstall of Firefox and dependencies (portupgrade -fR) deleting firefox using pkg_delete and reinstalling This seems to be the only thing in the log: Dec 19 19:35:59 janet kernel: pid 1260 (firefox-bin), uid 1001: exited on signal 12 (core dumped) I'm not sure what else to try. Any suggestions? Keith S. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 20 06:26:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC021065675 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 06:26:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@rhavenn.net) Received: from smtp114.dfw.emailsrvr.com (smtp114.dfw.emailsrvr.com [67.192.241.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0A488FC15 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 06:26:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp11.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 6432CD0C5F for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 01:07:22 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: by smtp11.relay.dfw1a.emailsrvr.com (Authenticated sender: rhavenn-AT-rhavenn.net) with ESMTPSA id 3AE9CD0BD4 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 01:07:22 -0500 (EST) Received: by vash.rhavenn.local (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D686116A4; Sun, 19 Dec 2010 21:07:18 -0900 (AKST) Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 21:07:18 -0900 From: Henrik Hudson To: questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101220060718.GA3103@alucard.int.rhavenn.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: Subject: freebsd bootloader / boot0cfg and multiple disks? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 06:26:58 -0000 I'm trying to get the FreeBSD boot loader to to boot off multiple disks, but I can't seem to get it to see my 3rd disk. FreeBSD 8.2-PRE amd64; stock kernel with sound card, ahci and PF added disk layout: ada0: freebsd main install (/, /tmp, /var, /usr, /home, swap) ada1: freebsd data disk ada2: win7 with ada2s1 being the "boot" 100MB, ada2s2 and ada2s3 being partitions How can I get boot0cfg to try and boot the 3rd disk, ada2s1? I added the 3rd disk after already having the first 2 setup and installed. Normally, I install Windows first and boot0cfg picks it up fine, but not this time :) The man page shows how to install a boot MBR on a disk and to reference the slices, but I can't seem to see how to reference a 2nd or 3rd disk. The default install picks up the 2nd disk (FreeBSD data), but obviously can't boot from that. So, it does seem to be able to redirect to other disks. I tried doing a boot0cfg -Bv -s 1 ada2, but that seems to just install a MBR on ada2 and it never gets picked up on ada0 boot menu. grub isn't supported on amd64 and grub2 seems to be all "wizards" and secondary "config" files :( Henrik -- Henrik Hudson lists@rhavenn.net ----------------------------------------- "God, root, what is difference?" Pitr; UF From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 20 18:21:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FCED106564A for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 18:21:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f51.google.com (mail-ew0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 301838FC1A for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 18:21:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so1701816ewy.10 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 10:21:51 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.34.203 with SMTP id m11mr1862916ebd.12.1292869310717; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 10:21:50 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.112.145 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 10:21:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8439ptgnf9.fsf@maxwell.cjones.org> References: <8439ptgnf9.fsf@maxwell.cjones.org> From: Chris Brennan Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 13:21:30 -0500 Message-ID: To: weif@weif.net Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: use of menus crashes Firefox? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 18:21:52 -0000 On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Keith Seyffarth wrote: > I'm not sure what else to try. Any suggestions? > gdbm the core.dump and see if that helps (you may need to enable symbols in your kernel as well as in the port in question to get a core.dump w/ enough info to be of use). You may also try cross-posting to mozilla's list (I'm not sure if fbsd.org has a mozilla list or not, so I would head over to mozzila.org and try there as well) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 20 18:25:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77BC0106566B for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 18:25:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ey0-f178.google.com (mail-ey0-f178.google.com [209.85.215.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 173698FC1C for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 18:25:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyh5 with SMTP id 5so1355108eyh.37 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 10:25:43 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.105.131 with SMTP id t3mr2557224ebo.25.1292869543580; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 10:25:43 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.112.145 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 10:25:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101220060718.GA3103@alucard.int.rhavenn.net> References: <20101220060718.GA3103@alucard.int.rhavenn.net> From: Chris Brennan Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 13:25:23 -0500 Message-ID: To: Henrik Hudson Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd bootloader / boot0cfg and multiple disks? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 18:25:45 -0000 On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Henrik Hudson wrote: > I'm trying to get the FreeBSD boot loader to to boot off multiple > disks, but I can't seem to get it to see my 3rd disk. > > FreeBSD 8.2-PRE amd64; stock kernel with sound card, ahci and PF added > > disk layout: > ada0: freebsd main install (/, /tmp, /var, /usr, /home, swap) > ada1: freebsd data disk > ada2: win7 with ada2s1 being the "boot" 100MB, ada2s2 and ada2s3 > being partitions > > How can I get boot0cfg to try and boot the 3rd disk, ada2s1? I added the > 3rd > disk after already having the first 2 setup and installed. Normally, > I install Windows first and boot0cfg picks it up fine, but not this > time :) > > The man page shows how to install a boot MBR on a disk and to > reference the slices, but I can't seem to see how to reference a 2nd > or 3rd disk. The default install picks up the 2nd disk (FreeBSD > data), but obviously can't boot from that. So, it does seem to be > able to redirect to other disks. > > I tried doing a boot0cfg -Bv -s 1 ada2, but that seems to just > install a MBR on ada2 and it never gets picked up on ada0 boot menu. > > grub isn't supported on amd64 and grub2 seems to be all "wizards" > and secondary "config" files :( > > Henrik, Did you mark ada0(s1) as bootable? Sounds like you might have missed that and marked the wrong disk/slice as bootable. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 20 20:11:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F57106564A for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 20:11:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gull@gull.us) Received: from mail-ey0-f178.google.com (mail-ey0-f178.google.com [209.85.215.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A24738FC12 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 20:11:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyh5 with SMTP id 5so1403026eyh.37 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:11:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.123.68 with SMTP id u44mr3083208eeh.21.1292875897448; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:11:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.127.4 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:11:37 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [69.91.158.201] In-Reply-To: References: <4D0B4D1D.8010700@gmail.com> <20101217152709.GE94554@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <4D0B84F5.4010905@unsane.co.uk> <20101217160221.GB94970@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:11:37 -0800 Message-ID: From: David Brodbeck To: krad Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SEBSD is dead? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 20:11:39 -0000 On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 2:51 AM, krad wrote: > > > On 17 December 2010 22:20, David Brodbeck wrote: >> >> On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 8:02 AM, Jerry McAllister wrot= e: >> > Anyway, SeLinux ain't 100% popular over there I noticed. >> > Maybe it is just a matter of getting used to it. =A0I got >> > tired of reading the posts on it, so haven't figured out >> > if they were substantive or just whiney. >> >> The problem with SELinux is it becomes very difficult to configure >> properly if you don't have a normal, out-of-the-box configuration. >> >> For example, I never did figure out how to keep it from blocking an >> rsync backup. =A0I disabled it after that, because a system I can't back >> up is pretty useless no matter how secure it is. :) >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > not sure if it will work on all linuxs but this works fine for me on cent= os > in enforcing mode > > setsebool -P rsync_disable_trans on Yeah, I'd seen that fix, too. As I recall it worked temporarily, then stopped working again, and issuing the command again didn't help for reasons that I couldn't figure out. I also had problems with SELinux breaking execution of external scripts by the SNMP server. I've seen various HOWTOs about how to craft new rules to permit things like this, but many of them seemed to be out of date or referred to tools that don't ship with RedHat. Documentation is thin and the rule syntax is so cryptic it makes sendmail.cf look like LOGO. It was obviously intended to be a "no user serviceable parts inside" sort of system, but that only works if your setup is completely standard. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 20 20:18:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFC26106564A for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 20:18:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gull@gull.us) Received: from mail-ew0-f51.google.com (mail-ew0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F2678FC12 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 20:18:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so1766341ewy.10 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:17:59 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.123.68 with SMTP id u44mr3087157eeh.21.1292876279290; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:17:59 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.127.4 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:17:59 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [69.91.158.201] In-Reply-To: <894762.38692.qm@web114415.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> References: <894762.38692.qm@web114415.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:17:59 -0800 Message-ID: From: David Brodbeck To: Josh Suid Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ssh interactive session, through intermediate hosts ... problems ... X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 20:18:01 -0000 On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 4:43 PM, Josh Suid wrote: > First, where on the ssh client command line (see above) can I specify a m= ore > liberal timeout value ? =A0Since my interactive session has three or more= layers > of host between it, the whole thing falls apart if even one link slows do= wn a > bit... =A0how can I make my ssh sessions more tolerant to timeouts ? At what point are you seeing timeouts? I've found many home routers time out idle TCP sessions quite quickly, so if it's the first jump, you may find enabling ClientAliveInterval helps. I find a setting of 300 seconds (5 minutes) is frequent enough to keep most routers happy. > Second, how can I construct this session with just a single command ? =A0= When I > try this: > > ssh user@host ssh user@host2 ssh user@host3 > > I get this error: > > # ssh user@host ssh user@host2 > Pseudo-terminal will not be allocated because stdin is not a terminal. > Permission denied (publickey,keyboard-interactive). > > Is there a way to build this tunnel with a single command ? (an ssh comma= nd, > run over an ssh command, run over an ssh command) Normally when you execute a command over SSH it doesn't allocate a pseudo-tty, like it normally will for an interactive session. You might try passing the -t command to force allocation of a ptty. Another option would be to use ssh -L to create a tunnel from one host to another, then running ssh over that tunnel. This would also work with scp. You may run into problems with host keys, though. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 20 20:25:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00B17106564A for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 20:25:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gull@gull.us) Received: from mail-ey0-f178.google.com (mail-ey0-f178.google.com [209.85.215.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DD1E8FC14 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 20:25:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyh5 with SMTP id 5so1408562eyh.37 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:25:03 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.123.68 with SMTP id u44mr3091183eeh.21.1292876703497; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:25:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.127.4 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:25:03 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [69.91.158.201] In-Reply-To: <20101208094223.GD11485@comcast.net> References: <20101203043805.GB8149@comcast.net> <20101203191339.61205ccb.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101204042952.0ac21e45.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101204055748.GA46559@comcast.net> <20101208083926.4c992c44.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101208094223.GD11485@comcast.net> Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:25:03 -0800 Message-ID: From: David Brodbeck To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: printer recommendations? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 20:25:05 -0000 On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:42 AM, Charlie Kester wrot= e: > As a last gasp effort, I gave my LJ4+ a thorough cleaning and replaced > the rollers for the output feed in the back. =A0And hey, it seems to be > working now! =A0The way it had been sounding, I was sure I'd broken > something the last time I replaced the toner cartridge after clearing a > paper jam. =A0But maybe I just didn't have the cartridge properly > seated... > > So now I'm looking into ways to adapt it to use a network connection. If you shop around you should be able to find an old JetDirect MIO card that will slot into the back of it. That's the best solution. There's actually a bit of a glut of them so it shouldn't be hard to obtain one. I tried to eBay one a while back and couldn't get a nibble even at $5. Computer surplus places are a good place to look for these cards, although you may have to take the printer that's attached to it. ;) IIRC they were the same from the original LaserJet up through the LJ4. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 20 20:29:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7F0E1065672 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 20:29:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gull@gull.us) Received: from mail-ey0-f178.google.com (mail-ey0-f178.google.com [209.85.215.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 690808FC28 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 20:29:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyh5 with SMTP id 5so1410134eyh.37 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:29:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.11.147 with SMTP id 19mr3113858eex.14.1292876950161; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:29:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.127.4 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:29:10 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [69.91.158.201] In-Reply-To: <20101208112741.7db7e6ac@core.draftnet> References: <4cff688e.DMzgcRTJhPHF8CWP%mueller6727@bellsouth.net> <20101208112741.7db7e6ac@core.draftnet> Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:29:10 -0800 Message-ID: From: David Brodbeck To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: Installer program for FreeBSD-9.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 20:29:11 -0000 On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 3:27 AM, Bruce Cran wrote: > On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 11:14:22 +0000 > "Thomas Mueller" wrote: > >> > The argument is normally that even without a CD drive everyone has >> > USB so should install using that instead of floppies. >> >> Not true on a very old computer (especially USB) > > That's why I said "the argument", implying that it's something I don't > agree with :) > I do think we need to be careful to remember that plenty of people > don't have modern setups. Also, boot-from-USB is not entirely standardized. In that regard it's sort of in the same position boot-from-CD was in in the 1990s. For example, Intel Macs won't boot from USB unless the drive has a GPT partition table. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 20 20:42:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7506E106566C for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 20:42:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f51.google.com (mail-ew0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F0718FC0A for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 20:42:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so1779616ewy.10 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:42:55 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.106.2 with SMTP id v2mr2416097ebo.51.1292877774519; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:42:54 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.112.145 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:42:34 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4D0B4D1D.8010700@gmail.com> <20101217152709.GE94554@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <4D0B84F5.4010905@unsane.co.uk> <20101217160221.GB94970@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> From: Chris Brennan Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 15:42:34 -0500 Message-ID: To: David Brodbeck Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, krad Subject: Re: SEBSD is dead? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 20:42:56 -0000 On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 3:11 PM, David Brodbeck wrote: > I've seen various HOWTOs about how to craft new rules to permit things > like this, but many of them seemed to be out of date or referred to > tools that don't ship with RedHat. Documentation is thin and the rule > syntax is so cryptic it makes sendmail.cf look like LOGO. It was > obviously intended to be a "no user serviceable parts inside" sort of > system, but that only works if your setup is completely standard. > > To be perfectly honest ... SELinux has frightening me from day one. For two reasons. 1) The government had the fingers in it (I just can't fathom them contributing positively and constructively to the F/OSS community. 2) Because it was so poorly documented that I couldn't figure it out. All it did was serve to piss me off and I sought other, tried-and-true methods for securing my systems. Beyond this, I've never seen a real and valid use for SELinux ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 20 20:56:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C87F106566C for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 20:56:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) Received: from neonpark.inter-sonic.com (neonpark.inter-sonic.com [212.247.8.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 048F88FC0A for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 20:56:22 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at BSDLabs AB Message-ID: <4D0FBF67.8010201@intersonic.se> Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 21:41:11 +0100 From: Per olof Ljungmark Organization: Intersonic AB User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.11) Gecko/20101029 Thunderbird/3.1.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: HP XW6400 install failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 20:56:23 -0000 Hi, The machine restarts during DVD/Memstick boot, possibly when is trying to identify the HD. If I take out the LSI 3041E SAS controller and replace it with another SCSI controller or the motherboard SATA all is fine, installing other OS's with the 3041 is also fine. Tried various FBSD incarnmations from CD's lying around but none worked. Tried several machines as well, got four of them so this should exclude hw failure. Anyone with similar experiences? The controller uses the mpt driver. I'm right now burning a 9-current DVD to see what it says... Thanks, per From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 00:26:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2AB9106566C for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 00:26:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from weif@weif.net) Received: from maxwell.cjones.org (host-69-146-226-138.chy-wy.client.bresnan.net [69.146.226.138]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA3B18FC16 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 00:26:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by maxwell.cjones.org (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 6DFC24A64BF; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 17:26:43 -0700 (MST) From: Keith Seyffarth To: Chris Brennan In-Reply-To: (message from Chris Brennan on Mon, 20 Dec 2010 13:21:30 -0500) References: <8439ptgnf9.fsf@maxwell.cjones.org> Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 17:26:43 -0700 Message-ID: <84tyi89dj0.fsf@maxwell.cjones.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: use of menus crashes Firefox? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: weif@weif.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 00:26:44 -0000 > gdbm the core.dump and see if that helps (you may need to enable symbols in Thanks for the information, but I'm not sure what you mean by "gdbm the core.dump." GDBM appears to be a database management tool of some sort, but the man page does not make it at all clear how one could or would gdbm a file. > your kernel as well as in the port in question to get a core.dump w/ enough > info to be of use). You may also try cross-posting to mozilla's list (I'm > not sure if fbsd.org has a mozilla list or not, so I would head over to > mozzila.org and try there as well) I did post to the Mozilla forum as well, but haven't heard anything there... Thanks, Keith S. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 00:53:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5C37106564A for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 00:53:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com (mail-ww0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 364E58FC0A for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 00:53:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwi17 with SMTP id 17so3443562wwi.1 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 16:53:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RJuGLdAEGr7ZIotkuZpywyxgp3Jh8NefdY8uBQmHV5I=; b=pjiBq3N2FcSa7vM3gly5LNRDkUvulCE1UWlAp7wHzfPs5AlLbqUSkOw5X45Cf7wZ02 vbNv2dhTIFKWDdQqEhOlmnHDorwLyjmvKI1Qf16kaewgd8SaNTXWtqvh2ekCU8BjMCoj nkqpfMopVOxcT0WGXGUrZYXZZDcrwjPDE2juQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=DMWL0kC+ygHiOMyaVqbzOAdlSqsrtiTMrbgiklAD0st+E/0qnjkJShFQLditwNjq/s t+ZQSVlKGsCd5mkMBXnptdfGe6kBjaLFpNg/m0Zx/zgTqVlBWxr2VR/Jj6H4ZbKmi91U ArOGQjgUFLyvhQ6XpGeYdFxZCcNwoRkDfSXGw= Received: by 10.216.172.206 with SMTP id t56mr1951651wel.66.1292892684081; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 16:51:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q18sm3169667wbe.5.2010.12.20.16.51.22 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 20 Dec 2010 16:51:22 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 00:51:19 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101221005119.3778d128@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <84tyi89dj0.fsf@maxwell.cjones.org> References: <8439ptgnf9.fsf@maxwell.cjones.org> <84tyi89dj0.fsf@maxwell.cjones.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.22.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: use of menus crashes Firefox? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 00:53:36 -0000 On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 17:26:43 -0700 Keith Seyffarth wrote: > > > gdbm the core.dump and see if that helps (you may need to enable > > symbols in > > Thanks for the information, but I'm not sure what you mean by "gdbm > the core.dump." GDBM appears to be a database management tool of some > sort, but the man page does not make it at all clear how one could or > would gdbm a file. Probably should have been gdb. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 01:05:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85AF4106564A for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 01:05:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411678FC08 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 01:05:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-37-207.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.37.207]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94BFB3D1BB for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 02:05:46 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id oBL15juj002745 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 02:05:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 02:05:45 +0100 From: Polytropon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20101221020545.e45981ef.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20101203043805.GB8149@comcast.net> <20101203191339.61205ccb.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101204042952.0ac21e45.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101204055748.GA46559@comcast.net> <20101208083926.4c992c44.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101208094223.GD11485@comcast.net> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: printer recommendations? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 01:05:48 -0000 On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:25:03 -0800, David Brodbeck wrote: > On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:42 AM, Charlie Kester wr= ote: > > As a last gasp effort, I gave my LJ4+ a thorough cleaning and replaced > > the rollers for the output feed in the back. =A0And hey, it seems to be > > working now! =A0The way it had been sounding, I was sure I'd broken > > something the last time I replaced the toner cartridge after clearing a > > paper jam. =A0But maybe I just didn't have the cartridge properly > > seated... > > > > So now I'm looking into ways to adapt it to use a network connection. >=20 > If you shop around you should be able to find an old JetDirect MIO > card that will slot into the back of it. That's the best solution. Agreed. There's an alternative solution that should be mentioned: In the past, there have been adaptors from parallel (Centronics) to RJ45 UTP network that could be put directly onto the back of the printer. Other more elegant solutions were small print servers, connected and configured via network, allowing one or two parallel printers to be attached. I'm not sure if such devices are still sold, but you should be able to get a used one for less than nothing. :-) --=20 Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 04:39:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2908B106564A for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 04:39:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 992088FC12 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 04:39:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id oBL4dWgb070354; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 15:39:32 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 15:39:32 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: Brandon Gooch In-Reply-To: <20101220120038.3434C106574B@hub.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20101221145455.T27345@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: <20101220120038.3434C106574B@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Da Rock Subject: Re: FBSD Realtime X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 04:39:36 -0000 In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 342, Issue 1, Message: 14 On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 19:49:08 -0600 Brandon Gooch wrote: > On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 6:49 AM, Da Rock > wrote: > >> I can't seem to get my head on straight with the realtime scheduling in > >> FBSD despite all my googling. Can someone give me a pointer to the latest > >> info? As far as I can tell FBSD has it, but only root(?) can use it? > >> > >> I'm interested in who can use it, and how to allow a user to obtain the > >> realtime access. > > There's an ongoing discussion/debate between two very knowledgeable > and talented developers (plus a supporting cast) regarding the > real-time support in FreeBSD; it's happening on freebsd-arch@: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2010-December/010835.html > > I suggest giving it a read if you are planning on deploying some > real-time process (or are interested in reading about FreeBSD > internals from some very knowledgeable people). Brandon, thanks for the pointer; I love it when those guys talk dirty :) Rock, I think that thread well explains why only root may assign rtprio. It's encouraging seeing rtprio get some oil; realtime@freebsd.org has been all but dead for years, its latest message scheduling euthanasia: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-realtime/2010-November/000035.html cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 04:41:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEE1B106564A for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 04:41:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rloefgren@forethought.net) Received: from mzpi3.forethought.net (mzpi3.forethought.net [216.241.36.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0D2E8FC14 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 04:41:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 216-241-45-95.static.forethought.net ([216.241.45.95] helo=auden.jmla.com) by mz1.forethought.net with esmtps (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PUtI5-0006hA-QA for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 20:53:34 -0700 Message-ID: <4D1024BC.3060208@forethought.net> Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 20:53:32 -0700 From: Reed Loefgren User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101030 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101203043805.GB8149@comcast.net> <20101203191339.61205ccb.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101204042952.0ac21e45.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101204055748.GA46559@comcast.net> <20101208083926.4c992c44.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101208094223.GD11485@comcast.net> <20101221020545.e45981ef.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20101221020545.e45981ef.freebsd@edvax.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: printer recommendations? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 04:41:56 -0000 On 12/20/10 18:05, Polytropon wrote: > On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:25:03 -0800, David Brodbeck wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:42 AM, Charlie Kester wrote: >>> As a last gasp effort, I gave my LJ4+ a thorough cleaning and replaced >>> the rollers for the output feed in the back. And hey, it seems to be >>> working now! The way it had been sounding, I was sure I'd broken >>> something the last time I replaced the toner cartridge after clearing a >>> paper jam. But maybe I just didn't have the cartridge properly >>> seated... >>> >>> So now I'm looking into ways to adapt it to use a network connection. >> If you shop around you should be able to find an old JetDirect MIO >> card that will slot into the back of it. That's the best solution. > Agreed. There's an alternative solution that should be > mentioned: In the past, there have been adaptors from > parallel (Centronics) to RJ45 UTP network that could be > put directly onto the back of the printer. Other more > elegant solutions were small print servers, connected > and configured via network, allowing one or two parallel > printers to be attached. I'm not sure if such devices > are still sold, but you should be able to get a used > one for less than nothing. :-) > > > Just lurking. Twice now I've purchased jetdirect cards, new in the box, on ebay for less than US$15.00 each. They work flawlessly. 4 Pluses are nice, much faster than my straight 4s. Built like a Checker Cab, almost as heavy... r From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 05:35:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED2671065672 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 05:35:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from corky1951@comcast.net) Received: from qmta04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF0B88FC1B for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 05:35:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta12.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.44]) by qmta04.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id lgm31f00D0x6nqcA4hbraw; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 05:35:51 +0000 Received: from comcast.net ([98.203.142.76]) by omta12.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id lhbn1f0071f6R9u8Yhbn2u; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 05:35:49 +0000 Received: by comcast.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 20 Dec 2010 21:35:30 -0800 Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 21:35:30 -0800 From: Charlie Kester To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101221053530.GD65526@comcast.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101203043805.GB8149@comcast.net> <20101203191339.61205ccb.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101204042952.0ac21e45.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101204055748.GA46559@comcast.net> <20101208083926.4c992c44.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101208094223.GD11485@comcast.net> <20101221020545.e45981ef.freebsd@edvax.de> <4D1024BC.3060208@forethought.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D1024BC.3060208@forethought.net> X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.20 X-Composer: Vim 7.2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: printer recommendations? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 05:35:52 -0000 On Mon 20 Dec 2010 at 19:53:32 PST Reed Loefgren wrote: >On 12/20/10 18:05, Polytropon wrote: >>On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 12:25:03 -0800, David Brodbeck wrote: >>>On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:42 AM, Charlie Kester wrote: >>>>As a last gasp effort, I gave my LJ4+ a thorough cleaning and replaced >>>>the rollers for the output feed in the back. And hey, it seems to be >>>>working now! The way it had been sounding, I was sure I'd broken >>>>something the last time I replaced the toner cartridge after clearing a >>>>paper jam. But maybe I just didn't have the cartridge properly >>>>seated... >>>> >>>>So now I'm looking into ways to adapt it to use a network connection. >>>If you shop around you should be able to find an old JetDirect MIO >>>card that will slot into the back of it. That's the best solution. >>Agreed. There's an alternative solution that should be >>mentioned: In the past, there have been adaptors from >>parallel (Centronics) to RJ45 UTP network that could be >>put directly onto the back of the printer. Other more >>elegant solutions were small print servers, connected >>and configured via network, allowing one or two parallel >>printers to be attached. I'm not sure if such devices >>are still sold, but you should be able to get a used >>one for less than nothing. :-) >> >> >> >Just lurking. Twice now I've purchased jetdirect cards, new in the >box, on ebay for less than US$15.00 each. They work flawlessly. 4 >Pluses are nice, much faster than my straight 4s. Built like a >Checker Cab, almost as heavy... LOL. Nice image. I was thinking it reminded me of my first car, an old 1955 Chevy. Thanks for suggesting the jetdirect cards, guys. I vaguely remembered seeing something like that, but I assumed that if any still existed in operating condition, they were inside a printer and not available for seperate purchase. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 05:54:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23083106566B for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 05:54:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gull@gull.us) Received: from mail-ey0-f178.google.com (mail-ey0-f178.google.com [209.85.215.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B6508FC0A for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 05:54:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyh5 with SMTP id 5so1552774eyh.37 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 21:54:12 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.37.141 with SMTP id y13mr393315eea.7.1292910852245; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 21:54:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.14.127.4 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 21:54:12 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [64.81.163.112] In-Reply-To: <20101221053530.GD65526@comcast.net> References: <20101203043805.GB8149@comcast.net> <20101203191339.61205ccb.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101204042952.0ac21e45.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101204055748.GA46559@comcast.net> <20101208083926.4c992c44.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101208094223.GD11485@comcast.net> <20101221020545.e45981ef.freebsd@edvax.de> <4D1024BC.3060208@forethought.net> <20101221053530.GD65526@comcast.net> Date: Mon, 20 Dec 2010 21:54:12 -0800 Message-ID: From: David Brodbeck To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: printer recommendations? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 05:54:14 -0000 On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 9:35 PM, Charlie Kester wro= te: > Thanks for suggesting the jetdirect cards, guys. =A0I vaguely remembered > seeing something like that, but I assumed that if any still existed in > operating condition, they were inside a printer and not available for > seperate purchase. I think what happens is when something finally kills the printer (like a dead fuser), the card gets pulled as a spare, because it's easy to remove. But the cards practically never fail, so they end up just sitting around. At least that's the way it always happened for me. ;) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 06:27:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2156C1065670 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 06:27:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ey0-f178.google.com (mail-ey0-f178.google.com [209.85.215.178]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB2E8FC1E for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 06:27:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyh5 with SMTP id 5so1558968eyh.37 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 22:27:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.34.203 with SMTP id m11mr2271102ebd.12.1292912858021; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 22:27:38 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.112.145 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 22:27:17 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Brennan Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 01:27:17 -0500 Message-ID: To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: LG Vortex (VS660) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 06:27:41 -0000 I have an LG Vortex (android2.2) phone, I'm pretty sure it's a VS660 and when I plug it into my fbsd8.1 laptop I get this Dec 20 19:31:36 blackdragon kernel: ugen1.3: at usbus1 Dec 20 19:31:36 blackdragon kernel: umass0: on usbus1 Dec 20 19:31:36 blackdragon kernel: umass0: SCSI over Bulk-Only; quirks = 0x0000 Dec 20 19:31:37 blackdragon kernel: umass0:2:0:-1: Attached to scbus2 Dec 20 19:31:37 blackdragon kernel: cd1 at umass-sim0 bus 0 scbus2 target 0 lun 0 Dec 20 19:31:37 blackdragon kernel: cd1: Removable CD-ROM SCSI-2 device Dec 20 19:31:37 blackdragon kernel: cd1: 40.000MB/s transfers Dec 20 19:31:37 blackdragon kernel: cd1: cd present [10360 x 512 byte records] Dec 20 19:31:37 blackdragon kernel: (cd1:umass-sim0:0:0:0): READ TOC/PMA/ATIP. CDB: 43 2 0 0 0 0 aa 0 c 0 Dec 20 19:31:37 blackdragon kernel: (cd1:umass-sim0:0:0:0): CAM status: SCSI Status Error Dec 20 19:31:37 blackdragon kernel: (cd1:umass-sim0:0:0:0): SCSI status: Check Condition Dec 20 19:31:37 blackdragon kernel: (cd1:umass-sim0:0:0:0): SCSI sense: ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:24,0 (Invalid field in CDB) Dec 20 19:32:11 blackdragon kernel: ugen1.3: at usbus1 (disconnected) Dec 20 19:32:11 blackdragon kernel: umass0: at uhub1, port 5, addr 3 (disconnected) Dec 20 19:32:11 blackdragon kernel: (cd1:umass-sim0:0:0:0): lost device Dec 20 19:32:11 blackdragon kernel: (cd1:umass-sim0:0:0:0): removing device entry Dec 20 19:32:13 blackdragon root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x1004 product 0x61c6 bus uhub1 Dec 20 19:32:13 blackdragon kernel: ugen1.3: at usbus1 Dec 20 19:32:13 blackdragon kernel: umass0: on usbus1 Dec 20 19:32:13 blackdragon kernel: umass0: SCSI over Bulk-Only; quirks = 0x0000 Dec 20 19:32:14 blackdragon kernel: umass0:2:0:-1: Attached to scbus2 Dec 20 19:32:15 blackdragon kernel: (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): TEST UNIT READY. CDB: 0 0 0 0 0 0 Dec 20 19:32:15 blackdragon kernel: (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): CAM status: SCSI Status Error Dec 20 19:32:15 blackdragon kernel: (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): SCSI status: Check Condition Dec 20 19:32:15 blackdragon kernel: (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): SCSI sense: ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:24,0 (Invalid field in CDB) Dec 20 19:32:15 blackdragon kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): unsupportable block size 0 Dec 20 19:32:15 blackdragon kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): lost device Dec 20 19:32:15 blackdragon kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): unsupportable block size 134217728 Dec 20 19:32:15 blackdragon kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): removing device entry 'uname -a' is FreeBSD blackdragon.xaerolimit.net 8.1-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p1 #2: Sat Oct 30 02:55:00 EDT 2010 root@blackdragon.xaerolimit.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BlackDragon amd64 as can be seen in the except from /var/log/messages, as soon as the kernel tries to assign it a device node it freaks out and removes the node. I didn't unplug it and replug it, it tried to assign it a device node twice and gave up. It charges just fine, I just can't access the memory card in the phone to copy some pictures around. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 06:30:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76957106564A for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 06:30:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f51.google.com (mail-ew0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E59A48FC15 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 06:30:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so1951563ewy.10 for ; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 22:30:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.31.198 with SMTP id z6mr339970ebc.38.1292913000052; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 22:30:00 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.112.145 with HTTP; Mon, 20 Dec 2010 22:29:37 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Brennan Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 01:29:37 -0500 Message-ID: To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: devel/py-dbus X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 06:30:03 -0000 I've been trying to do a portupgrade -a for the last month and I have been running into snags of all sorts. This one is with python The system is FreeBSD7.3/i386 (PIII/800Mhz, 384MB of ram) FreeBSD ziggy.xaerolimit.net 7.3-RELEASE-p3 FreeBSD 7.3-RELEASE-p3 #8: Sun Oct 24 01:53:03 EDT 2010 root@ziggy.xaerolimit.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ZIGGY i386 ===>>> Updating dependency entry for dbus-glib-0.88 in each dependent port ===>>> Re-installation of dbus-glib-0.88 succeeded ===>>> Delete dbus-1.4.0.tar.gz? y/n [n] ===>>> Returning to dependency check for devel/py-dbus ===>>> Dependency check complete for devel/py-dbus ===> Cleaning for py26-dbus-0.83.1_1 ===> License check disabled, port has not defined LICENSE ===> Extracting for py26-dbus-0.83.1_1 => SHA256 Checksum OK for dbus-python-0.83.1.tar.gz. ===> Patching for py26-dbus-0.83.1_1 ===> py26-dbus-0.83.1_1 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python2.6 - found ===> py26-dbus-0.83.1_1 depends on executable: gmake - found ===> py26-dbus-0.83.1_1 depends on package: libtool>=2.2 - found ===> py26-dbus-0.83.1_1 depends on shared library: dbus-glib-1.2 - found ===> py26-dbus-0.83.1_1 depends on shared library: intl - found ===> Configuring for py26-dbus-0.83.1_1 checking for a BSD-compatible install... /usr/bin/install -c -o root -g wheel checking whether build environment is sane... yes checking for a thread-safe mkdir -p... ./install-sh -c -d checking for gawk... no checking for mawk... no checking for nawk... nawk checking whether gmake sets $(MAKE)... yes checking build system type... i386-portbld-freebsd7.3 checking host system type... i386-portbld-freebsd7.3 checking for style of include used by gmake... GNU checking for gcc... cc checking whether the C compiler works... yes checking for C compiler default output file name... a.out checking for suffix of executables... checking whether we are cross compiling... no checking for suffix of object files... o checking whether we are using the GNU C compiler... yes checking whether cc accepts -g... yes checking for cc option to accept ISO C89... none needed checking dependency style of cc... gcc3 checking for a sed that does not truncate output... /usr/local/bin/gsed checking for grep that handles long lines and -e... /usr/bin/grep checking for egrep... /usr/bin/grep -E checking for fgrep... /usr/bin/grep -F checking for ld used by cc... /usr/bin/ld checking if the linker (/usr/bin/ld) is GNU ld... yes checking for BSD- or MS-compatible name lister (nm)... /usr/bin/nm -B checking the name lister (/usr/bin/nm -B) interface... BSD nm checking whether ln -s works... yes checking the maximum length of command line arguments... (cached) 262144 checking whether the shell understands some XSI constructs... yes checking whether the shell understands "+="... no checking for /usr/bin/ld option to reload object files... -r checking for objdump... objdump checking how to recognize dependent libraries... pass_all checking for ar... ar checking for strip... strip checking for ranlib... ranlib checking command to parse /usr/bin/nm -B output from cc object... ok checking how to run the C preprocessor... cpp checking for ANSI C header files... yes checking for sys/types.h... yes checking for stdlib.h... yes checking for string.h... yes checking for memory.h... yes checking for strings.h... yes checking for inttypes.h... yes checking for stdint.h... yes checking for unistd.h... yes checking for dlfcn.h... yes checking for objdir... .libs checking if cc supports -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions... no checking for cc option to produce PIC... -fPIC -DPIC checking if cc PIC flag -fPIC -DPIC works... yes checking if cc static flag -static works... yes checking if cc supports -c -o file.o... yes checking if cc supports -c -o file.o... (cached) yes checking whether the cc linker (/usr/bin/ld) supports shared libraries... yes checking whether -lc should be explicitly linked in... no checking dynamic linker characteristics... freebsd7.3 ld.so checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes checking if libtool supports shared libraries... yes checking whether to build shared libraries... yes checking whether to build static libraries... no checking whether /usr/local/bin/python2.6 version >= 2.4.0... yes checking for /usr/local/bin/python2.6 version... 2.6 checking for /usr/local/bin/python2.6 platform... freebsd7 checking for /usr/local/bin/python2.6 script directory... ${prefix}/lib/python2.6/ site-packages checking for /usr/local/bin/python2.6 extension module directory... ${exec_prefix} /lib/python2.6/site-packages checking for Python headers using /usr/local/bin/python2.6-config --includes... -I /usr/local/include/python2.6 -I/usr/local/include/python2.6 checking whether those headers are sufficient... no configure: error: could not find Python headers ===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. Please run the gnomelogalyzer, available from "http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/gnomelogalyzer.sh", which will diagnose the problem and suggest a solution. If - and only if - the gnomelogalyzer cannot solve the problem, report the build failure to the FreeBSD GNOME team at gnome@FreeBSD.org, and attach (a) "/usr/ports/devel/py-dbus/work/dbus-python-0.83.1/config.log", (b) the output of the failed make command, and (c) the gnomelogalyzer output. Also, it might be a good idea to provide an overview of all packages installed on your system (i.e. an `ls /var/db/pkg`). Put your attachment up on any website, copy-and-paste into http://freebsd-gnome.pastebin.com, or use send-pr(1) with the attachment. Try to avoid sending any attachments to the mailing list (gnome@FreeBSD.org), because attachments sent to FreeBSD mailing lists are usually discarded by the mailing list software. *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/devel/py-dbus. ===>>> make failed for devel/py-dbus ===>>> Aborting update ===>>> There are messages from installed ports to display, but first take a moment to review the error messages above. Then press Enter when ready to proceed. The above error was received by passing 'cd /usr/ports/lang/python && make upgrade-site-packages -DUSE_PORTMASTER' python2.6 is the only version of python installed and the above cmd was gotten from /usr/ports/UPDATING ... did I miss something or is this system just flushed itself? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 09:32:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F3F6106566C for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 09:32:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hedayati.mo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f196.google.com (mail-wy0-f196.google.com [74.125.82.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C6B38FC15 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 09:32:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyb40 with SMTP id 40so1414762wyb.7 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 01:32:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=YIFbkYPTWTjwlbMKu70c1dKR7HhgZL+H7GvZEe7GZgg=; b=oyhCGETlk9El/Lt9z21tPXof7Z8u5/020rO+06fsBacbMiS7ObwW2ANLeWsISpXmDP xmyIOG8dafR5VqekqgQgHvDINrom8SJPYZ//dHfINLAx1J6OMiOTKvVoB0HyaS8V7NI6 cNyrITk4SyyewTU1PiUWQ7c1wYFBF/O8lIj4Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=HJ4BRR0Zu6xxTiUCwBl2HujptiX5d4KmUpZqU8/4SVPIFj/G5Jj3qhO2vNIBMgbn3f 12x0r5ywcO2L0j1+HttZt84+JeYPBEy3HYivPbC552razpM5/zuAftcIwlW+X3ykO/cn 5DzriI13rbXqGNrYUMNVxz3hJXQckHY0WicZo= Received: by 10.227.154.7 with SMTP id m7mr3251870wbw.2.1292922850220; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 01:14:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.143.202 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 01:13:30 -0800 (PST) From: Mohammad Hedayati Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:43:30 +0330 Message-ID: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: soaccept X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 09:32:39 -0000 I'm about to use a char device for a kind of distributed processing, so I've coded the open function as follows. The problem is that soaccept returns 0 without populating the raddr. I've checked netstat, everything seems to be fine, the socket is created, bound and the state is LISTENING. Even the remote is connection is ESTABLISHED. But, it cannot receive anything. int open(struct cdev *dev, int flag, int otyp, struct thread *td) { uprintf("in open...\n"); int error = -1; socktd = td; error = socreate(AF_INET, &sock, SOCK_STREAM, IPPROTO_TCP, td->td_proc->p_ucred, socktd); if(error != 0) return error; sockaddr.sin_len = sizeof(struct sockaddr_in); sockaddr.sin_family = AF_INET; sockaddr.sin_port = htons(1234); sockaddr.sin_addr.s_addr = INADDR_ANY; error = sobind(sock, (struct sockaddr *)&sockaddr, socktd); uprintf("sobind error = %d\n", error); error = solisten(sock, 5, socktd); uprintf("solisten error = %d\n", error); error = soaccept(sock, (struct sockaddr **)&raddr); uprintf("soaccept error = %d, ip=%s\n", error, inet_ntoa(raddr->sin_addr)); uprintf("out open...\n"); return(error); } int read(struct cdev *dev, struct uio *uio, int ioflag) { int error = 0; error = soreceive(sock, (struct sockaddr **)&raddr, uio, NULL, NULL, NULL); return(error); } From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 10:58:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3162106564A for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 10:58:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christer.solskogen@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B05F88FC14 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 10:58:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so3635050qwj.13 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 02:58:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=QNH9ITS9XJTDbtqGrzvPWG6IdY8DBjoFZsnEnzgyoeQ=; b=XSLLd/8nKbNBVWemnYZK2mCpeRgXphJOobDWPfUv+5+5z8S7n5ORa0H2Muh/hzGfZs QI3Ug2DCNKCFleC3wXOndztMIRtjQT5GJVZbNqrLCPqR1vm+dAKIA/l8+g3uyLe1wvLP 8inMWbFlMfOQpqy14/WY2/K0NzmIT8u1FcRoQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=mCg36IiCgRt8WLilS40LIrvfBGCOgL8oQmu7r+XaqR2YwYry/8nrRJbvu15waP1TTD M0/qO/ZZw1irnkKHtSes/gW6KaBzHuYfuUMSZ25MEVlelYLpj5ni6AIpYuJSiQpkRjc/ t+i/32Ymm6a3ae14ofCyjyjnWyYi2qmAQdCvU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.95.8 with SMTP id b8mr4540302qcn.156.1292929119024; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 02:58:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.90.211 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 02:58:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:58:38 +0100 Message-ID: From: Christer Solskogen To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: A jail with a dash in its name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 10:58:40 -0000 I want to create a jail called forest-friend. And having a dash in the name seems to create problems for me. /etc/rc.conf: jail_forest-friend_rootdir=/usr/jails/forest-friend: not found how do I escape that? -- chs, From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 11:06:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D23106566B for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:06:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com (mail-ww0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B2368FC12 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:06:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwi17 with SMTP id 17so3817024wwi.1 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 03:06:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=IF2MBxCPdKhp7hi3InH0xizcqTCb7ZDGBFXzqnCfbS8=; b=aWfyNgnqVIu53HzV+Z4iRmoD1ODFt+rLFVHuLfQw7x8HHhZdMONGb40BRLE8vfgXqZ 2+NHj3pYOEQsmFCmDVpZdl3vaPK+GrUplIoXVZJpoUrUALUoIDowVU8ytCYkihulZABo SPio6XeKOaC0HuQvIjlRja+Mcebcb+9u7aqCs= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=hi4ScAjaz4zt/OTsKZh3ISz1mC/F51hM+WheAUTsgV2ovAttejaw6eggKON/3lQlnX YVkH+APWzboG7YpLNprmoZM6Y8BAURe/FqteyZCdmiOSOz36CcJeP5Xf/CdFZUA/nLGQ LGvdPAsW8El4PASGVSGvS8tlNmBfr/D1XQn0Y= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.51.135 with SMTP id b7mr8948585wec.29.1292929580932; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 03:06:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.72.198 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 03:06:19 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:06:19 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: Christer Solskogen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: A jail with a dash in its name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:06:22 -0000 On 21 December 2010 10:58, Christer Solskogen wrote: > I want to create a jail called forest-friend. And having a dash in the > name seems to create problems for me. > > /etc/rc.conf: jail_forest-friend_rootdir=/usr/jails/forest-friend: not > found > > how do I escape that? > > -- > chs, > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > i'd stay away from characters like that. It should be ok in theory to use but in my experience it is more likely to cause problems in the future From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 11:23:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 892A61065675 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:23:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christer.solskogen@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42C4B8FC1F for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:23:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk8 with SMTP id 8so4381112qyk.13 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 03:23:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=nD3mXLUQP+WXtY14LYJdppD7iY6lpQt3z6pS+xyxmqM=; b=BjYfQuac4kGIbiAzMr52KKt7vr2OFKqg7zEyQZTcmxQ5LsUYs0WFajOizFnDrgeqpF /11lALMGUPzAkehLQpm0b8PxBb6t/9B/ktKH55RfGLMTzhdOfFLQsUOHmavBwlKgLTut fF+UkdyjA0Sqyk/o/Ypmcz4FFVU4yRrR5JhMY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=C/xs+Z2HdFvcwgMt+TpLY/78VtxbqkaeUVrVsPOhbEwYJfHk3CvI9sugG0HMbMA8XU x3i+VGAwz0nYvWJp1e0rJ3NTLJJPEp3Ywq9r76Tnq3r7m0FPAtVSmZYIUmuZtwNSXCTH 76xBKNtyuNrhodq2UHlW+dbtpOusxzpgSD8/I= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.242.77 with SMTP id lh13mr4547779qcb.194.1292930606466; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 03:23:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.90.211 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 03:23:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:23:26 +0100 Message-ID: From: Christer Solskogen To: krad Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: A jail with a dash in its name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:23:27 -0000 On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 12:06 PM, krad wrote: > i'd stay away from characters like that. It should be ok in theory to use > but in my experience it is more likely to cause problems in the future > There's no problem of having a dash in a hostname, so why should it be in a jailname? -- chs, From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 11:28:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A43D106564A for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:28:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f48.google.com (mail-bw0-f48.google.com [209.85.214.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1510E8FC13 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:28:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so3965689bwz.7 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 03:28:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:reply-to :in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type; bh=fcfMTqi3s8dSTPHWCz++d2hIhdMJnQ7rf5MRQ3jUFHM=; b=XVlyi/0tUXb9CtMusNB9zBdREWE9G9hm7fYw6K7nHqYGVgMpRkM5xm/EQvpkTREWnK M3G8uZsxp0CTX0ERw/JKEl5gYSkKxEnOOORNX+asBAazS7pBD1wtmCExYOdBzX+4Ctbi Kr8ItQU5EWcA5+oNvK2vtXZl5iHAq/NRBMGn0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; b=R6zJc+sisi9s/mYLWOmLhZB5Lb4Q4VWqtbT4KlHGJcvQRJCYEwLrdwKv/yiE/9Ax3f /l9AJhPgGhl+fJzI5yYmMExZ5V0ksau2u/NkLtaM3gPyYoDo3JjqOYex8G3mxUNB+eFv IR+cxCzvN2oOVSgg3Dr5vONGO2I9UKo+lqMjk= Received: by 10.204.71.20 with SMTP id f20mr4620005bkj.139.1292930916598; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 03:28:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.52.19 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 03:28:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Chris Rees Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:28:06 +0000 Message-ID: To: Christer Solskogen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List , krad Subject: Re: A jail with a dash in its name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: utisoft@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:28:38 -0000 On 21 December 2010 11:23, Christer Solskogen wrote: > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 12:06 PM, krad wrote: >> i'd stay away from characters like that. It should be ok in theory to use >> but in my experience it is more likely to cause problems in the future >> > > There's no problem of having a dash in a hostname, so why should it be > in a jailname? > You tried single quotes? Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 11:30:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 230DE1065694 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:30:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christer.solskogen@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C37108FC21 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:30:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk8 with SMTP id 8so4386863qyk.13 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 03:30:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ee+NKNZsUAk+x9Zhr/3TiurAHPW5O1ciNrzcZuWFdZI=; b=iJFveCBgy1dv/hVJVmfDhnZAOj9h8bHxxZJ8lrW3x8oUDUu3Bjo/lU7Nax+9q6Erdw nyUINvY2YD94JgAyumiX6EUwn0zcI5ITFKuewX2yYS0Iwu/THjwe+NzL+v8agbSgFLvm nLoHI5UVNgmtK8NyVeotf3IRyrDx/LSy56vBA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=UbX0g3bVLMKmhMpVqOwZj4k+bNpb+ung4TZ7PVjBaxv0hYclnLlaSaYVMhvaT3SK76 lniQ11Mlv/sQQGbN/42tDurGRWzAROFq1Yk8Bymb/o4YHI8VeS9/EvauDDjSP1D/MW5m RhvtstNSHpH4xHwhdLJ27ArEEQyJOy5fnLbBA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.249.11 with SMTP id mi11mr4627043qcb.118.1292931022019; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 03:30:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.90.211 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 03:30:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:30:21 +0100 Message-ID: From: Christer Solskogen To: utisoft@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List , krad Subject: Re: A jail with a dash in its name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:30:23 -0000 On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 12:28 PM, Chris Rees wrote: > You tried single quotes? > How? Where? :-) jail_'forest-friend'_rootdir=/usr/jails/forest-friend also gives "/etc/rc.conf: jail_forest-friend_rootdir=/usr/jails/forest-friend: not found" -- chs, From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 12:11:40 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D0081065679 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:11:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (ns2.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FB0F8FC16 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:11:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.3/rdb1) id oBLCBbJW007155; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 06:11:37 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 06:11:37 -0600 (CST) From: Robert Bonomi Message-ID: <201012211211.oBLCBbJW007155@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: christer.solskogen@gmail.com, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Cc: Subject: Re: A jail with a dash in its name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:11:40 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Tue Dec 21 04:58:59 2010 > Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:58:38 +0100 > From: Christer Solskogen > To: FreeBSD Mailing List > Subject: A jail with a dash in its name > > I want to create a jail called forest-friend. And having a dash in the > name seems to create problems for me. > > /etc/rc.conf: jail_forest-friend_rootdir=/usr/jails/forest-friend: not found > > how do I escape that? It looks to me like yo're chasing the wrong problem. That statement appears to be a shell variable assignment, yet the error message indicates that the system is trying to find an executable by the name of the entire expression. You need to show us the actual line in /etc/rc.conf _and_ the surrounding context. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 12:25:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 863B3106564A for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:25:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DD1E8FC08 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:25:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.193]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 054ED5C21 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 22:30:23 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4D109BE3.3000703@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 22:21:55 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101119 Thunderbird/3.0.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4D0D8AEA.2070309@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20101219135712.08374097@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20101219135712.08374097@gumby.homeunix.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Realtime X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:25:33 -0000 On 12/19/10 23:57, RW wrote: > On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 14:32:42 +1000 > Da Rock wrote: > > >> I can't seem to get my head on straight with the realtime scheduling >> in FBSD despite all my googling. Can someone give me a pointer to the >> latest info? As far as I can tell FBSD has it, but only root(?) can >> use it? >> >> I'm interested in who can use it, and how to allow a user to obtain >> the realtime access. >> > see rtprio(1). It has to be run as root so you would probably want use > sudo. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Bugger! I was hoping there was more to it than that... I've read that already. Thanks From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 12:30:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCDCF106564A for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:30:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 825638FC1A for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:30:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.193]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FD0A5C21 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 22:35:35 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4D109D1B.90600@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 22:27:07 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101119 Thunderbird/3.0.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4D0D8AEA.2070309@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4D0DFF44.5090409@herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: FBSD Realtime X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:30:44 -0000 On 12/20/10 11:49, Brandon Gooch wrote: > On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 6:49 AM, Da Rock > wrote: > >> In light of the significant spam of late, it occurs to me that my former >> subject line may have been a little sparse... :) >> >> On 12/19/10 14:32, Da Rock wrote: >> >>> I can't seem to get my head on straight with the realtime scheduling in >>> FBSD despite all my googling. Can someone give me a pointer to the latest >>> info? As far as I can tell FBSD has it, but only root(?) can use it? >>> >>> I'm interested in who can use it, and how to allow a user to obtain the >>> realtime access. >>> > There's an ongoing discussion/debate between two very knowledgeable > and talented developers (plus a supporting cast) regarding the > real-time support in FreeBSD; it's happening on freebsd-arch@: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2010-December/010835.html > > I suggest giving it a read if you are planning on deploying some > real-time process (or are interested in reading about FreeBSD > internals from some very knowledgeable people). > Good show! I'll check that out. I'm actually the latter... :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 12:40:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C4C5106566B for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:40:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4030F8FC1C for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:40:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.193]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id BCDA35C21; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 22:45:42 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4D109F7A.7060704@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 22:37:14 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101119 Thunderbird/3.0.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Smith References: <20101220120038.3434C106574B@hub.freebsd.org> <20101221145455.T27345@sola.nimnet.asn.au> In-Reply-To: <20101221145455.T27345@sola.nimnet.asn.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Brandon Gooch , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FBSD Realtime X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:40:52 -0000 On 12/21/10 14:39, Ian Smith wrote: > In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 342, Issue 1, Message: 14 > On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 19:49:08 -0600 > Brandon Gooch wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 6:49 AM, Da Rock > > wrote: > > > >> I can't seem to get my head on straight with the realtime scheduling in > > >> FBSD despite all my googling. Can someone give me a pointer to the latest > > >> info? As far as I can tell FBSD has it, but only root(?) can use it? > > >> > > >> I'm interested in who can use it, and how to allow a user to obtain the > > >> realtime access. > > > > There's an ongoing discussion/debate between two very knowledgeable > > and talented developers (plus a supporting cast) regarding the > > real-time support in FreeBSD; it's happening on freebsd-arch@: > > > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arch/2010-December/010835.html > > > > I suggest giving it a read if you are planning on deploying some > > real-time process (or are interested in reading about FreeBSD > > internals from some very knowledgeable people). > > Brandon, thanks for the pointer; I love it when those guys talk dirty :) > > Rock, I think that thread well explains why only root may assign rtprio. > > It's encouraging seeing rtprio get some oil; realtime@freebsd.org has > been all but dead for years, its latest message scheduling euthanasia: > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-realtime/2010-November/000035.html > > cheers, Ian > Yeah I know, its why I asked here first. I'm hunting in the archives, but given its so sparse and so far mostly past history I wanted to see if there was any newer info/docs/lists where I could gain some understanding of it. Thanks guys From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 12:46:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74A2B1065674 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:46:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF5508FC1C for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:46:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.193]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7B205C21 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 22:51:47 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4D10A0E7.4010407@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 22:43:19 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101119 Thunderbird/3.0.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: LG Vortex (VS660) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:46:57 -0000 On 12/21/10 16:27, Chris Brennan wrote: > I have an LG Vortex (android2.2) phone, I'm pretty sure it's a VS660 and > when I plug it into my fbsd8.1 laptop I get this > > Dec 20 19:31:36 blackdragon kernel: ugen1.3: at usbus1 > Dec 20 19:31:36 blackdragon kernel: umass0: USB Device, class 0/0, rev 2.00/2.26, addr 3> on usbus1 > Dec 20 19:31:36 blackdragon kernel: umass0: SCSI over Bulk-Only; quirks = > 0x0000 > Dec 20 19:31:37 blackdragon kernel: umass0:2:0:-1: Attached to scbus2 > Dec 20 19:31:37 blackdragon kernel: cd1 at umass-sim0 bus 0 scbus2 target 0 > lun 0 > Dec 20 19:31:37 blackdragon kernel: cd1: Removable > CD-ROM SCSI-2 device > Dec 20 19:31:37 blackdragon kernel: cd1: 40.000MB/s transfers > Dec 20 19:31:37 blackdragon kernel: cd1: cd present [10360 x 512 byte > records] > Dec 20 19:31:37 blackdragon kernel: (cd1:umass-sim0:0:0:0): READ > TOC/PMA/ATIP. CDB: 43 2 0 0 0 0 aa 0 c 0 > Dec 20 19:31:37 blackdragon kernel: (cd1:umass-sim0:0:0:0): CAM status: SCSI > Status Error > Dec 20 19:31:37 blackdragon kernel: (cd1:umass-sim0:0:0:0): SCSI status: > Check Condition > Dec 20 19:31:37 blackdragon kernel: (cd1:umass-sim0:0:0:0): SCSI sense: > ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:24,0 (Invalid field in CDB) > Dec 20 19:32:11 blackdragon kernel: ugen1.3: at usbus1 > (disconnected) > Dec 20 19:32:11 blackdragon kernel: umass0: at uhub1, port 5, addr 3 > (disconnected) > Dec 20 19:32:11 blackdragon kernel: (cd1:umass-sim0:0:0:0): lost device > Dec 20 19:32:11 blackdragon kernel: (cd1:umass-sim0:0:0:0): removing device > entry > Dec 20 19:32:13 blackdragon root: Unknown USB device: vendor 0x1004 product > 0x61c6 bus uhub1 > Dec 20 19:32:13 blackdragon kernel: ugen1.3: at usbus1 > Dec 20 19:32:13 blackdragon kernel: umass0: USB Device, class 0/0, rev 2.00/2.26, addr 3> on usbus1 > Dec 20 19:32:13 blackdragon kernel: umass0: SCSI over Bulk-Only; quirks = > 0x0000 > Dec 20 19:32:14 blackdragon kernel: umass0:2:0:-1: Attached to scbus2 > Dec 20 19:32:15 blackdragon kernel: (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): TEST UNIT > READY. CDB: 0 0 0 0 0 0 > Dec 20 19:32:15 blackdragon kernel: (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): CAM status: > SCSI Status Error > Dec 20 19:32:15 blackdragon kernel: (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): SCSI status: > Check Condition > Dec 20 19:32:15 blackdragon kernel: (probe0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): SCSI sense: > ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:24,0 (Invalid field in CDB) > Dec 20 19:32:15 blackdragon kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): unsupportable > block size 0 > Dec 20 19:32:15 blackdragon kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): lost device > Dec 20 19:32:15 blackdragon kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): unsupportable > block size 134217728 > Dec 20 19:32:15 blackdragon kernel: (da0:umass-sim0:0:0:0): removing device > entry > > 'uname -a' is FreeBSD blackdragon.xaerolimit.net 8.1-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD > 8.1-RELEASE-p1 #2: Sat Oct 30 02:55:00 EDT 2010 > root@blackdragon.xaerolimit.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BlackDragon amd64 > > as can be seen in the except from /var/log/messages, as soon as the kernel > tries to assign it a device node it freaks out and removes the node. I > didn't unplug it and replug it, it tried to assign it a device node twice > and gave up. It charges just fine, I just can't access the memory card in > the phone to copy some pictures around. > _______________________________________________ > > Well thats new :) I've been playing with a HTC Android, disk access is fine, but trying to get the tethering working. Whats usbconfig say? And is it every time you plug in, or does it come good second or third (+) time round? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 12:48:22 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAA901065672 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:48:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christer.solskogen@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D63E8FC19 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:48:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk36 with SMTP id 36so3734574qyk.13 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 04:48:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=IHifASUF/aOTrWKX1cN6gc4c3jBn0dvV3T2ChB5jmQs=; b=jwqyWmFUA7h3by77xuM7h3Kg+XrnAeW+sFW6Z47a+tY2acjapCGfnJ90Bp1OpL8agC RXly/KSb/ucpRCzEYoM+CpwvQEH+PUCISTlZMFqJIVZAfcvcRKP5XqCgRjbps6a2Id0F XPJ2rvCES9+o7jcJhQCNgi3EFWjeUBKNak35Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=rPHW7608Ludst7FtaisEBEMVMZ5631XDuct/b+JmpPsq90Q6QPrAXXdaEsVECm/vSx amJ8GnBtm6KPkqpuI06XK/D0DspPRiQqJG661gEK7eqxgfAg9rHf26kzDBcnoit596A0 Se3f69Ku/kuIr+O0+4qj9w/X3nZKZM7V85KKE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.249.11 with SMTP id mi11mr4687648qcb.118.1292935701588; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 04:48:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.90.211 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 04:48:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201012211211.oBLCBbJW007155@mail.r-bonomi.com> References: <201012211211.oBLCBbJW007155@mail.r-bonomi.com> Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:48:21 +0100 Message-ID: From: Christer Solskogen To: Robert Bonomi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A jail with a dash in its name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:48:22 -0000 On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Robert Bonomi wrote: > That statement appears to be a shell variable assignment, yet the > error message indicates that the system is trying to find an executable > by the name of the entire expression. > > You need to show us the actual line in /etc/rc.conf _and_ the surrounding > context. > part of rc.conf: jail_forest-friend_rootdir=/usr/jails/forest-friend jail_forest-friend_hostname=forest-friend jail_forest-friend_ip=192.168.0.15 cheer# /etc/rc.d/jail /etc/rc.conf: jail_forest-friend_rootdir=/usr/jails/forest-friend: not found jail_forest-friend_hostname=forest-friend: not found jail_forest-friend_ip=192.168.0.15: not found Usage: /etc/rc.d/jail [fast|force|one](start|stop|restart|rcvar) -- chs, From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 12:58:20 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FCE1106566B for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:58:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5527F8FC18 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:58:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.193]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 916695C21 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 23:03:11 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4D10A393.2030008@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 22:54:43 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101119 Thunderbird/3.0.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <201012211211.oBLCBbJW007155@mail.r-bonomi.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: A jail with a dash in its name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:58:20 -0000 On 12/21/10 22:48, Christer Solskogen wrote: > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Robert Bonomi wrote: > >> That statement appears to be a shell variable assignment, yet the >> error message indicates that the system is trying to find an executable >> by the name of the entire expression. >> >> You need to show us the actual line in /etc/rc.conf _and_ the surrounding >> context. >> >> > part of rc.conf: > > jail_forest-friend_rootdir=/usr/jails/forest-friend > jail_forest-friend_hostname=forest-friend > jail_forest-friend_ip=192.168.0.15 > > cheer# /etc/rc.d/jail > /etc/rc.conf: jail_forest-friend_rootdir=/usr/jails/forest-friend: not found > jail_forest-friend_hostname=forest-friend: not found > jail_forest-friend_ip=192.168.0.15: not found > Usage: /etc/rc.d/jail [fast|force|one](start|stop|restart|rcvar) > > > I believe what was referred to earlier was the lack of quotes- as in "". The rc variables in the conf are strings, so your rc.conf should have this: jail_forest-friend_rootdir="/usr/jails/forest-friend" jail_forest-friend_ip="192.168.0.15" However, whether or not a hyphen is allowed in the jail name is another matter. Yes a hyphen is allowed in a hostname, but in the rc.conf the hostname is set in a string (as mentioned before). Also, the jail name and hostname don't need to be the same thing. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 13:21:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 799A2106564A for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:21:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christer.solskogen@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2833D8FC0C for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:21:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so3763819qwj.13 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 05:21:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=A0Q1Try7UXRAlvs4BSz4yGzqCsZfc9uKOf/xR/tXe10=; b=HXWti3dlBrGYCRq7lKDGYTWleqZOqsrsImUR4fRp/CPhdxDLUz6k67VrLfZLZ1ao4b d3ROsvgFWZ0fLfIVKKKZ5ufH3Y9w2WbJcp87LlCUzCHpK+5o/PvSJyL9x+egdKAE0V8Y VdyaD7n7lOebceLmUnRxOjUbRapbVP/o18WbQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=czU2ZgjMMFl4AaUxQRqKAE7TFvdTFbzRqeVEjdpEfqeISJ4dBpK/B5RPJLRH0vZj9B B0JkggETqAq0OKkRWWU4b/n2fBQYa1Q7p2Fv1Zu48FdRm/SVZA5SrPW4YrF1/axUorqy WJGlr+mWFZs8FS1e4VRfw+eqfa2vkdykam2/g= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.220.144 with SMTP id hy16mr4718608qcb.80.1292937661122; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 05:21:01 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.90.211 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 05:21:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D10A393.2030008@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <201012211211.oBLCBbJW007155@mail.r-bonomi.com> <4D10A393.2030008@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 14:21:01 +0100 Message-ID: From: Christer Solskogen To: Da Rock Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A jail with a dash in its name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:21:02 -0000 On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Da Rock wrote: > However, whether or not a hyphen is allowed in the jail name is another > matter. Yes a hyphen is allowed in a hostname, but in the rc.conf the > hostname is set in a string (as mentioned before). Also, the jail name and > hostname don't need to be the same thing. Hence my email :-) This is how my rc.conf looks now: #jail configuration for forest-friend jail_forest-friend_rootdir="/usr/jails/forest-friend" jail_forest-friend_hostname="forest-friend" jail_forest-friend_ip="192.168.0.15" But still: [root@cheer /usr/local/share/jailcfg/templates/default/etc]# /etc/rc.d/jail /etc/rc.conf: jail_forest-friend_rootdir=/usr/jails/forest-friend: not found jail_forest-friend_hostname=forest-friend: not found jail_forest-friend_ip=192.168.0.15: not found Usage: /etc/rc.d/jail [fast|force|one](start|stop|restart|rcvar) -- chs, From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 14:04:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9E01106564A for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 14:04:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48D9B8FC08 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 14:04:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so3882135wyf.13 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 06:04:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=y/RqGVYe7EMmsd2AXEyJGitz+HzBRNjNZ8Pzw/Csp5E=; b=u14hyaot1+icJp8NwzTLduzMPZDAJkrN9sAG5qLLsEg5FIQE0W1By26jwOEiyFGESZ SIUSZNj1izpkX7sBRsQWIXDvcOXAW93cHAXmS6FctLvzzmMt9JjG/lcLC0+5BJXWdy+m At9yiTr0Ov2WDZW+umadmAXNrzZLKNtokcnjk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=QrlcGSzrc3EwDf5F88udh36qfAuGueNgmK7XIfisIDstJARwnHWo3nP0AZzQuyeaQo 3/llq6gUiHMKCqyVtfS57OOPMMUpzHFCjhYeyou12iQdz0iB98O2GOc1HuBZsO4ln2IQ sOQru4HaXSMnUwjVdN1/s0Xq/rbA7APIzFQV4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.0.140 with SMTP id 12mr4049web.29.1292940246707; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 06:04:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.72.198 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 06:04:06 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <201012211211.oBLCBbJW007155@mail.r-bonomi.com> <4D10A393.2030008@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 14:04:06 +0000 Message-ID: From: krad To: Christer Solskogen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Da Rock Subject: Re: A jail with a dash in its name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 14:04:08 -0000 On 21 December 2010 13:21, Christer Solskogen wrote: > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 1:54 PM, Da Rock > wrote: > > > However, whether or not a hyphen is allowed in the jail name is another > > matter. Yes a hyphen is allowed in a hostname, but in the rc.conf the > > hostname is set in a string (as mentioned before). Also, the jail name > and > > hostname don't need to be the same thing. > > Hence my email :-) > > This is how my rc.conf looks now: > #jail configuration for forest-friend > jail_forest-friend_rootdir="/usr/jails/forest-friend" > jail_forest-friend_hostname="forest-friend" > jail_forest-friend_ip="192.168.0.15" > > But still: > [root@cheer /usr/local/share/jailcfg/templates/default/etc]# > /etc/rc.d/jail > /etc/rc.conf: jail_forest-friend_rootdir=/usr/jails/forest-friend: not > found > jail_forest-friend_hostname=forest-friend: not found > jail_forest-friend_ip=192.168.0.15: not found > Usage: /etc/rc.d/jail [fast|force|one](start|stop|restart|rcvar) > > -- > chs, > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Its a shell limitation, neither bash or sh allow '-' as a valid character in a variable name $ sh $ test-car="test" test-car=test: not found $ test\car="test" testcar=test: not found $ test\\-car="test" test\-car=test: not found From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 14:12:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42D0C1065696 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 14:12:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounce-14754328-688441831@nf114.n-email.net) Received: from nf114.n-email.net (nf114.n-email.net [208.40.253.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAE688FC22 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 14:12:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.16.2.114] ([172.16.2.114:17641] helo=nf114.n-email.net) by ecelerity (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.0.28.38595 r(38597)) with ESMTP id AF/D8-22086-E11B01D4; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 08:52:31 -0500 From: "Skyline Trade Show Tips" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 08:30:00 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: X-Binding: skyline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: 18 Hidden Rules of Trade Shows X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 14:12:33 -0000 CLICK BELOW to read this message in your browser: http://tracking.skyline.com/t/14754328/688441831/54268308/0/?b44ed14b=OTk3ODgzNTM3NTBmNmE0NWFjNmFjYzM3NTVmMjQxOWQ%3d&x=0462185f If clicking doesn't work, copy the line above and paste it into your browser window. To remove your name from this list, send a blank email to leave-14754328-688441831.6bbae92de321221368883c607ff24c97@nf114.n-email.net or click the link below http://tracking.skyline.com/t/14754328/688441831/50172148/0/?3e076d18=ZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmc%3d&c73c8e04=c2t5bGluZQ%3d%3d&x=7b5cfd71 This email was sent to: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org This email was sent by: Skyline Exhibits 3355 Discovery Road, Eagan, MN 55121 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 15:09:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BA68106564A for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 15:09:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 782048FC1D for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 15:09:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so3869788wwf.31 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 07:09:36 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.135.13 with SMTP id l13mr3449207wbt.84.1292944176164; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 07:09:36 -0800 (PST) Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.227.145.133 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 07:09:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D109BE3.3000703@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <4D0D8AEA.2070309@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20101219135712.08374097@gumby.homeunix.com> <4D109BE3.3000703@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 10:09:36 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: jTpHomSwZ7gc-MYl0GAWGQguQZ4 Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: Da Rock Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Realtime X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 15:09:38 -0000 On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 7:21 AM, Da Rock wrote: > On 12/19/10 23:57, RW wrote: >> >> On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 14:32:42 +1000 >> Da Rock =A0wrote: [...] > > Bugger! I was hoping there was more to it than that... I've read that > already. > Yeah I was left with the same feeling after tagging your thread for follow-up. The man says that it derives from the HP-UX model so maybe there are some references to that, and we shoudl start there. I would like to know what the exact differences are with nice. I was expecting to find for example, the rtprio value to be in actual time units, question: is there a correlation to the number and a concrete RT value say cpu cycles or so? Is there a way to calculate the the minimum expected timeslice or the maximum time to re-schedule. For example, in PLC design you usually have to guarantee that you will evaluate a certain number of ladder instruction in a maximum amount of time, say 1000 ladder instructions in a worst case of 100ms. So the question is if this is rt scheduling then there must be a correlation with rt units. I don't have much time but I will try to research this soon.... > Thanks > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 15:31:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A27AD1065673 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 15:31:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55EDA8FC12 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 15:31:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PV4Bq-0007NT-1t for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 16:31:50 +0100 Received: from lara.cc.fer.hr ([161.53.72.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 16:31:50 +0100 Received: from ivoras by lara.cc.fer.hr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 16:31:50 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Ivan Voras Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 16:31:38 +0100 Lines: 29 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: lara.cc.fer.hr User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101102 Thunderbird/3.1.6 In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.2 Subject: Re: A jail with a dash in its name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 15:31:51 -0000 On 21/12/2010 12:23, Christer Solskogen wrote: > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 12:06 PM, krad wrote: >> i'd stay away from characters like that. It should be ok in theory to use >> but in my experience it is more likely to cause problems in the future >> > > There's no problem of having a dash in a hostname, so why should it be > in a jailname? Well, the immediate reason here is this: http://www.gnu.org/software/bash/manual/bashref.html#Definitions """ name A word consisting solely of letters, numbers, and underscores, and beginning with a letter or underscore. Names are used as shell variable and function names. Also referred to as an identifier. """ (ignoring that /bin/sh is not bash but the syntax is the same for this purpose). /etc/rc.conf is basically a shell script containing only variable assignments. I think you actually *could* have jails with arbitrary names (including international / utf-8 if you're not worried about formatting much) but only if you are going to manage them manually, not with /etc/rc.conf. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 16:55:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 484F1106564A for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 16:55:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f51.google.com (mail-ew0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAA0B8FC18 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 16:55:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so2258701ewy.10 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 08:55:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.31.209 with SMTP id z17mr4894017ebc.12.1292950522398; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 08:55:22 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.112.145 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 08:55:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101221005119.3778d128@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <8439ptgnf9.fsf@maxwell.cjones.org> <84tyi89dj0.fsf@maxwell.cjones.org> <20101221005119.3778d128@gumby.homeunix.com> From: Chris Brennan Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 11:55:02 -0500 Message-ID: To: RW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: use of menus crashes Firefox? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 16:55:24 -0000 On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 7:51 PM, RW wrote: > On Mon, 20 Dec 2010 17:26:43 -0700 > Keith Seyffarth wrote: > > > > > > gdbm the core.dump and see if that helps (you may need to enable > > > symbols in > > > > Thanks for the information, but I'm not sure what you mean by "gdbm > > the core.dump." GDBM appears to be a database management tool of some > > sort, but the man page does not make it at all clear how one could or > > would gdbm a file. > > Probably should have been gdb. > Yes, should have been gdb, fat fingers tend to stumble when you type fast :D From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 17:31:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86BC3106564A for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 17:31:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f51.google.com (mail-ew0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 265CE8FC08 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 17:31:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so2291098ewy.10 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 09:31:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.31.209 with SMTP id z17mr4921970ebc.12.1292952716856; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 09:31:56 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.112.145 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 09:31:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D10A0E7.4010407@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <4D10A0E7.4010407@herveybayaustralia.com.au> From: Chris Brennan Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:31:36 -0500 Message-ID: To: Da Rock Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LG Vortex (VS660) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 17:31:58 -0000 On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 7:43 AM, Da Rock < freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au> wrote: > Well thats new :) > > I've been playing with a HTC Android, disk access is fine, but trying to > get the tethering working. > > Whats usbconfig say? And is it every time you plug in, or does it come good > second or third (+) time round? > > usbconfig says ugen1.3: at usbus1, cfg=0 md=HOST spd=HIGH (480Mbps) pwr=ON It's pretty consistent as far as the number of tries. I'm not worried about tethering so much as being able to plug it in to my laptop when I travel to add/remove data from the memory card (fbsd doesn't particularly like my internal card reader). From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 20:03:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB899106566C for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 20:03:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mark@msen.com) Received: from shell.msen.com (msen.com [148.59.86.2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A70DF8FC08 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 20:03:52 +0000 (UTC) X-Sent-To: Received: from europa.localnet (c-68-40-255-141.hsd1.mi.comcast.net [68.40.255.141]) (authenticated bits=0) by shell.msen.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oBLJcWOs080502 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 14:38:32 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mark@msen.com) From: Mark Moellering To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 14:39:08 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.12.1 (FreeBSD/8.1-RELEASE; KDE/4.3.1; i386; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201012211439.09158.mark@msen.com> Received-SPF: Pass (sender authenticated); receiver=msen.com; client-ip=68.40.255.141; envelope-from= Received-SPF: Pass (sender authenticated); receiver=msen.com; client-ip=68.40.255.141; helo=europa.localnet Subject: E-Mail scaling question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 20:03:52 -0000 Hello All, My company needs a [new] e-mail solution for a product rollout. Rather than have a few e-mail domains with lots of addresses, the solution we need is for a very few (mostly one, very rarely more than 3) accounts on upwards of tens of thousands of domains. I can't find any info on scaling sendmail or postfix to this many domains. If anyone has any info, knowledge, horror stories, etc. It would be greatly appreciated Also, I am assuming that to play nice, we need a dedicated IP per domain, so I may have to survive setting that up before I even get to the e-mail. If anyone knows of a legitimate way to set up an e-mail domain on a shared IP and not have half of the e-mail servers assume we are spammers, let me know. Thanks in advance Mark Moellering classcreator.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 20:08:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D991106567A for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 20:08:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dak.col@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f48.google.com (mail-bw0-f48.google.com [209.85.214.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1ABD8FC16 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 20:08:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so4544626bwz.7 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:08:42 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=hauiicoSYMH6DeRK278mJl3yHE5+0lU0DzIlAjvY7SA=; b=VZMGpS082ax1B8KKyta90iN8H899YwyOTKagfNuYz/IwuN/anS29qxvwj6Bq/QWvhr POAL77QFa0g4Ok9+gBtzRYrbGsovjlAW3ij+zAVWEgwZ55Ja2EKaDyGNrSaOp8BGWKCr 85PgbO8xU4UtUiTLAW1BPY7IODQiDfsFP7LYk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=gw0byCtc7xtIe95e+Uch0lAvlru0+E4G1xJvw9AaALXtGzbtTKafGvVgl6pYMjShem zolbhM59J8JtNq3jksGX+ZKEHyCwTqfyyC1Lt2SFd4TrTU8jJn0ZIp0cymkq9btFSZg1 tNwEqtIllHXBgokpyLZix5doKCY70LooEeDdA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.100.196 with SMTP id z4mr5127647bkn.194.1292962121734; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:08:41 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.84.145 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:08:41 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201012211439.09158.mark@msen.com> References: <201012211439.09158.mark@msen.com> Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 15:08:41 -0500 Message-ID: From: Diego Arias To: Mark Moellering Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: E-Mail scaling question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 20:08:44 -0000 On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 2:39 PM, Mark Moellering wrote: > Hello All, > My company needs a [new] e-mail solution for a product rollout. Rather > than > have a few e-mail domains with lots of addresses, the solution we need is > for > a very few (mostly one, very rarely more than 3) accounts on upwards of > tens > of thousands of domains. > > I can't find any info on scaling sendmail or postfix to this many domains. > If > anyone has any info, knowledge, horror stories, etc. It would be greatly > appreciated > > Also, I am assuming that to play nice, we need a dedicated IP per domain, > so I > may have to survive setting that up before I even get to the e-mail. If > anyone knows of a legitimate way to set up an e-mail domain on a shared IP > and > not have half of the e-mail servers assume we are spammers, let me know. > > Thanks in advance > > Mark Moellering > classcreator.com > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > You can set an IP only for mail for all the domains and point the MX Records to it. The PTR record just point it to the server real name and thats it. -- Still Going Strong!!! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 20:19:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DAFA1065674 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 20:19:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cswiger@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout023.mac.com (asmtpout023.mac.com [17.148.16.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8594F8FC08 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 20:19:57 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from cswiger1.apple.com ([17.209.4.71]) by asmtp023.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LDS006W2OH7LN70@asmtp023.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:19:56 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-12-21_07:2010-12-21, 2010-12-21, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1012210107 From: Chuck Swiger In-reply-to: <201012211439.09158.mark@msen.com> Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 12:19:55 -0800 Message-id: References: <201012211439.09158.mark@msen.com> To: Mark Moellering X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: E-Mail scaling question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 20:19:57 -0000 On Dec 21, 2010, at 11:39 AM, Mark Moellering wrote: > My company needs a [new] e-mail solution for a product rollout. Rather than > have a few e-mail domains with lots of addresses, the solution we need is for > a very few (mostly one, very rarely more than 3) accounts on upwards of tens > of thousands of domains. I don't see much value in setting up tens of thousands of what sound like vanity domains, but you'll need postmaster@ working at each of these domains to be even minimally compliant with RFC-822/2822/etc, and most people expect abuse@ to work also. > I can't find any info on scaling sendmail or postfix to this many domains. If > anyone has any info, knowledge, horror stories, etc. It would be greatly > appreciated You'll want to use hash table map type for sendmail's virtusertable or Postfix's virtual table-- see /usr/share/sendmail/cf/README or /usr/local/share/doc/postfix/VIRTUAL_README. > Also, I am assuming that to play nice, we need a dedicated IP per domain, so I > may have to survive setting that up before I even get to the e-mail. If > anyone knows of a legitimate way to set up an e-mail domain on a shared IP and > not have half of the e-mail servers assume we are spammers, let me know. There's nothing unusual about having one IP serve as the MX for many domains. After all, many hosting companies provided a shared email solution. What matters most to spam checking is the mail contents, whether forward and reverse DNS match, whether postmaster@ and abuse@ works, and whether bounces, address verification, etc are handled properly. Regards, -- -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 20:26:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB4C41065740 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 20:26:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CD688FC13 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 20:26:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBLKQoWD026079 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 20:26:50 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk oBLKQoWD026079 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1292963210; bh=S6baiOQBdmv9yn54jhVBY3jEzShA7hbtsiebPpJSxIM=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4D110D83.9080702@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20T ue,=2021=20Dec=202010=2020:26:43=20+0000|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0=20(M acintosh=3B=20U=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B=20en-US=3B=20r v:1.9.2.13)=20Gecko/20101207=20Thunderbird/3.1.7|MIME-Version:=201 .0|To:=20freebsd-questions@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20A=20jail=2 0with=20a=20dash=20in=20its=20name|References:=20<201012211211.oBL CBbJW007155@mail.r-bonomi.com>|In-Reply-To:=20<201012211211.oBLCBb JW007155@mail.r-bonomi.com>|X-Enigmail-Version:=201.1.1|OpenPGP:=2 0id=3D60AE908C|Content-Type:=20multipart/signed=3B=20micalg=3Dpgp- sha1=3B=0D=0A=20protocol=3D"application/pgp-signature"=3B=0D=0A=20 boundary=3D"------------enigBACEECABA3726F7C0511B705"; b=HGD4PuieNeXuWwDhEj5zk4wCzLvKz1S/IUITFCZ83d6yxdwl9ZzVOXCzK2XfBWXso 3ZQiaFHqz/94+O3hnSun1ByS1DHEc/+QzHP1hJm9guIQqLbO34exWxwYRUTmN02KB3 N8/zrmUECvw3nfW9hoTeAJ/bqDT5xUdexZ1ktXM0= Message-ID: <4D110D83.9080702@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 20:26:43 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <201012211211.oBLCBbJW007155@mail.r-bonomi.com> In-Reply-To: <201012211211.oBLCBbJW007155@mail.r-bonomi.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigBACEECABA3726F7C0511B705" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.5 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_40,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: A jail with a dash in its name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 20:26:56 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigBACEECABA3726F7C0511B705 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 21/12/2010 12:11, Robert Bonomi wrote: >> I want to create a jail called forest-friend. And having a dash in the= >> > name seems to create problems for me. >> > >> > /etc/rc.conf: jail_forest-friend_rootdir=3D/usr/jails/forest-friend:= not found >> > >> > how do I escape that? You don't. rc.conf uses bourne shell syntax. The entries are all variable initializations. "jail_forest-friend_rootdir" is illegal as a variable name -- you can't have a '-' character in there. I suggest you /call/ your jail forest_friend and use that form in everything that appears on the LHS of an assignment in rc.conf. Of course, there's no problem with using the form 'forest-friend' on the RHS of any assignments, so long as it's properly quoted, of course. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigBACEECABA3726F7C0511B705 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk0RDYoACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwOpQCgjk54397YCjwTrNaJEPMmfm6m GsUAn0tgiHbL0Y20qzsMiOLBPS0K6V+u =jlvv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigBACEECABA3726F7C0511B705-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 21:05:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5875F106566B for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 21:05:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arab@tangerine-army.co.uk) Received: from smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E16C48FC15 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 21:05:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.23.170.139] (helo=anti-virus01-10) by smtp-out4.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1PUzOb-0001bG-5v for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 10:24:41 +0000 Received: from [94.168.170.153] (helo=Mercury.galaxy.lan.lcl) by asmtp-out5.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PUzNz-0002jv-5S for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 10:24:03 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 10:24:02 -0000 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Message-ID: <01FB8F39BAD0BD49A6D0DA8F7897392904F7FF@Mercury.galaxy.lan.lcl> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Install problem with 8.0 Release Thread-Index: Acug+TBAlhg2Hb6dTMupoPfHnMf4zg== From: "Graeme Dargie" To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Install problem with 8.0 Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 21:05:38 -0000 Hi list, =20 I am trying to help a friend who is overseas install FreeBSD 8.0 i386. Left to his own devices the install failed, so I ran through it with him last night, all is fine till it gets to the root password screen where the install just hangs. He is not very techy, all I could glean was the system has an sis chipset and it previously ran windows 7 with no problems, I am hoping to get a more detailed spec of the machine, but I thought might make an initial enquiry to the list to see if anyone has come across this behaviour before, or are there any obvious possible causes ? =20 =20 Regards =20 Graeme From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 21:12:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7538B10657A3 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 21:12:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f48.google.com (mail-bw0-f48.google.com [209.85.214.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBA248FC15 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 21:12:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so4615749bwz.7 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:12:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=c4+9cn0jd/i5c1MWLoenKRZkskxi/QFKTi4wRslfSHw=; b=rlOn94g7PNk8o4lTYpUBMmm5i6sdsJi2NBOGSpDiVL6E47r2KEq5jZ1n7Q7wTvIvuo dQ7c155QtfDhQw4ZWYMKtCdR6iJXpfGOT2bRQI2/7htwdKRoTpUCUqsD5Etcvr+gYyDK 2OEAQF3sG+SZrBz/0FIxhc0/cno9lw34iwPnc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=TCYpbd9T/4AH4XoJUTlMsTlbaKywbc6vpWxdZbm/qr9kkl+ei9WjAtwr/N3BJldSkt BPoUBhSSMyBe/P5NrQxXoUqRlS4Ji+BKSWwRqMzkaCQZE9tRqPDh24+Q1VN1juEzjUSj BdK95Drxcwj8cLswBVpYS1la2n0S3gJEjnV90= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.104.15 with SMTP id m15mr5166119bko.108.1292965941421; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:12:21 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.48.94 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 13:12:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <01FB8F39BAD0BD49A6D0DA8F7897392904F7FF@Mercury.galaxy.lan.lcl> References: <01FB8F39BAD0BD49A6D0DA8F7897392904F7FF@Mercury.galaxy.lan.lcl> Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 15:12:21 -0600 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Graeme Dargie Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Install problem with 8.0 Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 21:12:23 -0000 On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 4:24 AM, Graeme Dargie wrote: > I am trying to help a friend who is overseas install FreeBSD 8.0 i386. > Left to his own devices the install failed, so I ran through it with him > last night, all is fine till it gets to the root password screen where > the install just hangs. He is not very techy, all I could glean was the > system has an sis chipset and it previously ran windows 7 with no > problems, I am hoping to get a more detailed spec of the machine, but I > thought might make an initial enquiry to the list to see if anyone has > come across this behaviour before, or are there any obvious possible > causes ? > I'm not aware of anything that would cause those specific symptoms, but FreeBSD 8.0 is no longer supported. You should be using 8.1 and 8.2 is coming soon. Another possibility would be to use the PCBSD installer to install either PCBSD or a plain FreeBSD install. The newer PCBSD installer supports installing either version. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 21:22:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5B65106564A for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 21:22:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1-6.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FCFF8FC0A for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 21:22:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:5570:ff31:c40c:8eac] ([IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:5570:ff31:c40c:8eac]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBLLMjKE012024 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 21 Dec 2010 16:22:45 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-ID: <4D111AA5.8030903@sentex.net> Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 16:22:45 -0500 From: Mike Tancsa User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Graeme Dargie References: <01FB8F39BAD0BD49A6D0DA8F7897392904F7FF@Mercury.galaxy.lan.lcl> In-Reply-To: <01FB8F39BAD0BD49A6D0DA8F7897392904F7FF@Mercury.galaxy.lan.lcl> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Install problem with 8.0 Release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 21:22:47 -0000 On 12/21/2010 5:24 AM, Graeme Dargie wrote: > Hi list, > > > > I am trying to help a friend who is overseas install FreeBSD 8.0 i386. > Left to his own devices the install failed, so I ran through it with him > last night, all is fine till it gets to the root password screen where > the install just hangs. He is not very techy, all I could glean was the > system has an sis chipset and it previously ran windows 7 with no > problems, I am hoping to get a more detailed spec of the machine, but I > thought might make an initial enquiry to the list to see if anyone has > come across this behaviour before, or are there any obvious possible > causes ? Hard to say without more details as to why its hanging, but I would not bother with 8.0 as its quite old. Instead, try ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/ISO-IMAGES/8.2/FreeBSD-8.2-BETA1-i386-disc1.iso There is wider hardware support and many, many bug fixes. ---Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 22:31:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19C5A1065673 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 22:31:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from christer.solskogen@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qy0-f182.google.com (mail-qy0-f182.google.com [209.85.216.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6C138FC23 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 22:31:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk36 with SMTP id 36so4283737qyk.13 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 14:31:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=A305QiQqDIbn3lz6co9IHPSoto7Hnp+Hk80+3Sl0HUU=; b=K19atPD8VIoklngIoWseE80QOrsUiWxJ1fEkGtsDTkvJzP4YErpRZ/DuRi/GPrh5mL Sj9lUFmCiRP2668KDqVrNFf9D44/PI2WfbWErFDLqcUNoxWjuP5jiyrIEXHUsOJ02AF3 m9wYyt9DHfPZaL1avlI34MC9Yf55dH0ssPeLQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=kvDLpBXtSzTrGavpuVCLWa2qKlU19mSU4zwz4gAi1BegA1Z+YCllmFdiIp6Tuzt8j6 WFRvjjBB8OcLg+ouvPXg6nb2tYyELTIIGFnGrBBgnDYfq+9a0IJq08sGvsUgvDiswfqJ Cw42YYDCV7BPEeSGOiVS96PR9Wwc5zD1/TDhI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.95.8 with SMTP id b8mr5047329qcn.156.1292970702952; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 14:31:42 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.90.211 with HTTP; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 14:31:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D110D83.9080702@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <201012211211.oBLCBbJW007155@mail.r-bonomi.com> <4D110D83.9080702@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 23:31:42 +0100 Message-ID: From: Christer Solskogen To: Matthew Seaman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A jail with a dash in its name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 22:31:44 -0000 On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Of course, there's no problem with using the form 'forest-friend' on the > RHS of any assignments, so long as it's properly quoted, of course. > Thanks for all your help! I chose to remove all hyphens instead. -- chs From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 22:42:21 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A8FE106566C for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 22:42:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peo@intersonic.se) Received: from neonpark.inter-sonic.com (neonpark.inter-sonic.com [212.247.8.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2090F8FC12 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 22:42:20 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at BSDLabs AB Message-ID: <20101221234217.68653809fq39pbsw@webmail.ljungmark.net> Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 23:42:17 +0100 From: Per olof Ljungmark To: Per olof Ljungmark References: <4D0FBF67.8010201@intersonic.se> In-Reply-To: <4D0FBF67.8010201@intersonic.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; DelSp="Yes"; format="flowed" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit User-Agent: Dynamic Internet Messaging Program (DIMP) H3 (1.1.6) Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HP XW6400 install failure X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 22:42:21 -0000 Quoting Per olof Ljungmark : > Hi, > > The machine restarts during DVD/Memstick boot, possibly when is > trying to identify the HD. If I take out the LSI 3041E SAS > controller and replace it with another SCSI controller or the > motherboard SATA all is fine, installing other OS's with the 3041 is > also fine. > > Tried various FBSD incarnmations from CD's lying around but none > worked. Tried several machines as well, got four of them so this > should exclude hw failure. > > Anyone with similar experiences? The controller uses the mpt driver. > > I'm right now burning a 9-current DVD to see what it says... > Answering myself here, I guess this controller is not supported with mpe(4), I just thought it was... if someone thinks otherwise just let me know! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Dec 21 23:19:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AAA7106564A for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 23:19:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomaszd@paraklet.net) Received: from bxc133.internetdsl.tpnet.pl (bxc133.internetdsl.tpnet.pl [83.18.236.133]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 723018FC16 for ; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 23:19:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 43907 invoked by uid 0); 21 Dec 2010 23:19:09 -0000 Received: from 78.147.234.108 (tomaszd@paraklet.net@78.147.234.108) by first.magraf.pl (envelope-from , uid 0) with qmail-scanner-2.01st (clamdscan: 0.95.3/12424. spamassassin: 3.2.5. perlscan: 2.01st. Clear:RC:0(78.147.234.108):SA:0(-0.3/5.0):. Processed in 20.896554 secs); 21 Dec 2010 23:19:09 -0000 X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.3 required=5.0 Received: from unknown (HELO tomasz-dereszynskis-imac-g5.local) (tomaszd@paraklet.net@78.147.234.108) by bxc133.internetdsl.tpnet.pl with CAMELLIA256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 21 Dec 2010 23:18:47 -0000 Message-ID: <4D1135ED.2050706@paraklet.net> Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 23:19:09 +0000 From: tomasz dereszynski User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10.4; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mark Moellering References: <201012211439.09158.mark@msen.com> In-Reply-To: <201012211439.09158.mark@msen.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 23:41:07 +0000 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: E-Mail scaling question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 23:19:12 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 21/12/2010 19:39, Mark Moellering wrote: > Hello All, > My company needs a [new] e-mail solution for a product rollout. Rather than > have a few e-mail domains with lots of addresses, the solution we need is for > a very few (mostly one, very rarely more than 3) accounts on upwards of tens > of thousands of domains. > > I can't find any info on scaling sendmail or postfix to this many domains. If > anyone has any info, knowledge, horror stories, etc. It would be greatly > appreciated > > Also, I am assuming that to play nice, we need a dedicated IP per domain, so I > may have to survive setting that up before I even get to the e-mail. If > anyone knows of a legitimate way to set up an e-mail domain on a shared IP and > not have half of the e-mail servers assume we are spammers, let me know. > > Thanks in advance > > Mark Moellering > classcreator.com > Any (or almost any) MTA you pick is able to handle 100's of domains with few addresses on them. Once you start running AV/Antispam and work our expected volume you may start thinking about performance issues... Question is what are you actually trying to achieve? Objectives? what is your business problem? Start from there and work your way out. There are plenty of companies offering hosted mail solution which may turn way cheaper then doing it yourself and so on. - -- bEsT rEgArDs | "Confidence is what you have before you tomasz dereszynski | understand the problem." -- Woody Allen | Spes confisa Deo | "In theory, theory and practice are much numquam confusa recedit | the same. In practice they are very | different." -- Albert Einstein -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNETXsAAoJEF8D4Gbs1j4hS4QIALlbqNOI3mjFJ54qsltHJ+za uuwEpUBro6anypYew+pdom2RXoSkNI0lsEnL9Yp73fa7Bgj/MWfjvqsBOCJn1oVS 4fovXamsS+2Xu/msOEE09krSMW5bKOLm5PUxcpLdBLDauZgPx4YmEaqGcgKhH884 YUtKtT2suJvCitvPW8pnfc3jUYAmvs+GFjMVcDDXVmumQxDmk3DRFpqZGtbdzE9d m47JWxxnmZAyAalZ87Bn8Dnc3BTzsdEQGF4gfyQ+3ai2e037a0/35Bc92Z6gZXFP FqWMa/b8Z/UV33+U+7jhJ9cQBssBT/jKF/OXlfkar0A4e9+VW7ruBbQow2yqOPY= =54/i -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 22 11:01:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 303BE1065693 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:01:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@g8kbv.demon.co.uk) Received: from anchor-post-3.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-3.mail.demon.net [195.173.77.134]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F08C38FC15 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:01:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.225.127.64] (helo=[192.168.33.1]) by anchor-post-3.mail.demon.net with esmtpa (AUTH g8kbv) (Exim 4.69) id 1PVMRS-0002Hp-pO for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:01:11 +0000 From: "Dave" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:01:10 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <4D11DA76.32672.214EF771@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> Priority: normal X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.52) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body Subject: Well, I broke it! FreeBSD V8.1 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:01:12 -0000 Hi... I was trying to disable the console screensaver, and found that in sysinstall, there is no way to select "none" as an option. So I went and edited /etc/rc.conf to comment out the line:- Saver="fire" (or whatever it is) I put a ; at the beginning of the line, and now FreeBSD wont come up, showing an error (unexpected ;) and leaving me with a # prompt. How do I get to re-edit rc.conf, to correct the problem, as all command line commands result in a "not found" error. Also. What's the "Correct" way to disable a console screensaver? Sysinstall alows you to select and enable one, but not remove it! Bit of an oversight that I suspect.... Regards. Dave B. (Chief numpty!) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 22 11:15:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AD46106564A for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:15:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexer@internode.on.net) Received: from mail.internode.on.net (bld-mail18.adl2.internode.on.net [150.101.137.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 03F318FC08 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:15:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mai.dhcp.chocolate.lan (unverified [203.122.194.109]) by mail.internode.on.net (SurgeMail 3.8f2) with ESMTP id 50547570-1927428 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:45:17 +1030 (CDT) From: Indexer Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:45:11 +1030 Message-Id: To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 1.3.1 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Subject: Port based VLAN X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:15:19 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I plan to make a FreeBSD based router sometime soon. I would like to be = able to do port based vlanning on the router, so that a client computer = that plugs into that socket is "dumb" to the vlans' existance. IE em0 - untagged em1 - vlan 1 em2 - vlan 2 Is what i want to achieve (as a simple example). This way i can use = unmanaged switches on em2, and all clients behind that are to the router = on vlan2=20 How does one go about this on freebsd.=20 Thanks William Brown pgp.mit.edu -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJNEd3DAAoJEHF16AnLoz6JT4gP+wX5ZTY4vnd+QfTHFTQLLUNs g+UZfCUXxK0lb/6k0OCyLyoC1yMYt6fuFWshGEZpxrpxEDX0wb11tlU8P+QFJt9q ETDCZQMX8merJSO4d2iKWJ0rcnc91FE8P+GcX6qc0uwHHCALoAyYgo1wSkxXZWkw p5XJVnR/xhXMyk4A+xKxB37DNbTmWVxbj5z+K8sSPQnBRoje/t7IeAQQjUxe3oMV G3h3uMc0lww2vjhZLpqs2yB6DLERZDTsoX7n0qRZ7ODTxE3DwDZGC8A/ZN8HtJxy XKaAcTnH6mbncrowDDeL9i8cAzLb8Tay6WjQcRG2rXDFNrCj0lQ6FdZ7ePXVasp5 Q67kohgYbUjm1G1usV5eW0d/7H5vmavMrE018gHCJ4UdUCZqmt77TENBAtUkG9tf cWoGzy2hwlC/Am8Nobo1saBQv+ChjCsMwNuq47PE4sU7LTPNPMX4GrP3iTCvrYjM JwMb63F2v81eJX0EA88paPrqj/7swIppzOR3iVIuqh6yrWsnPwXVZ2iMBt8cNHh5 98TYp3K2sBxi8N8ehdeiQhCnNiNTsL/q/UU/Yo0VkQg24tj5KPNRNNhHme16BD9k A8mS1pK+K8zZFklrm1yI0veYF/NFAEUduZ4ccn7q9swweulziaRNsWe6cWBMvs7M MWGD68Ev0OXMgm4GCXwd =3Dbvpq -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 22 11:27:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE785106564A for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:27:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f48.google.com (mail-bw0-f48.google.com [209.85.214.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77BC58FC1B for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:27:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz8 with SMTP id 8so5170728bwz.7 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 03:27:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:received :reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; bh=azDQmXzlQln9hx7S1rN5hYPoQUXacu/tGexoJp+qAms=; b=xZIE2aCrqP/qNh8dkVyWcjuyIdxCnggo95v421smGg4z7auGwpahqWzEEKM/taZuEH 3fGVhfynFs8vU913vzSyexXam0Jn76YMVwabHXLhZwZzEewV4UgCZzgTeKcYLDofgaOg 7ytv8LUA+JyJoAYKjP+ywvv1xOFakB9F5sXpg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; b=iZsvEKjeQoSJ5GU8EZexgRxWWSTHQF6jQh+n8n+WENr2ohuJB45nSIpOQNCyg+vnIX c+Hvkh1BWHUSz2TBT94OS7rquFVT5S4yHSsIOVAaH+GCfLmGBBD+YPWCqOTo5eZdOZth sAWvP8JH5Dn3jqfohGKazWfA/dk03FRrqodJE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.65.135 with SMTP id j7mr1922012bki.85.1293017225348; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 03:27:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.52.19 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 03:27:05 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.52.19 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 03:27:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D11DA76.32672.214EF771@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> References: <4D11DA76.32672.214EF771@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:27:05 +0000 Message-ID: From: Chris Rees To: Dave Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Well, I broke it! FreeBSD V8.1 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: utisoft@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:27:07 -0000 Your PATH isn't set. # fsck / # mount -uw / # /bin/sed -i.bak -e 's/^;//' /etc/rc.conf Or (can't remember where des is kept) # fsck /usr # mount /usr # /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's/^;//' /etc/rc.conf Good luck! Chris -------- Sorry for top-posting, Android won't let me quote, but K-9 can't yet do threading. On 22 Dec 2010 11:01, "Dave" wrote: > Hi... > > I was trying to disable the console screensaver, and found that in > sysinstall, there is no way to select "none" as an option. > > So I went and edited /etc/rc.conf to comment out the line:- > Saver="fire" (or whatever it is) > > I put a ; at the beginning of the line, and now FreeBSD wont come up, > showing an error (unexpected ;) and leaving me with a # prompt. > > How do I get to re-edit rc.conf, to correct the problem, as all command > line commands result in a "not found" error. > > Also. What's the "Correct" way to disable a console screensaver? > > Sysinstall alows you to select and enable one, but not remove it! > > Bit of an oversight that I suspect.... > > Regards. > > Dave B. (Chief numpty!) > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 22 11:40:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E87B106564A for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:40:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from odhiambo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44D588FC15 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:40:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so4791142qwj.13 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 03:40:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=rzusG9kMLCI7gK6fQAtoY4SfkIxAf372iEXtNMzHJJ4=; b=o54d4WMPK2hOZ9xhpvLjSOD5QVGibG4/zgWkvECha7KamYc/drkg0JVmepukMEztT5 KSErsRtFicmeRuecsvUzseI6KOyk7WdyHUoratt2RbVRhudFC3LY0DV4hT9cqdgPw/J5 R0h4qR3CGGHZdV8iLaQM5bQqHFAbJEIJXQNlA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; b=p2tZoBdo0UARwiLpnqsFhFr/xQ6l22NSMLZeZGEmbPFQExj670UlRWzn1qIaQ8Aj3s S3lk+pl+p49NtbzTTn6zZ4+zZULf7UGnDogMVuXjslmwUoPQW85YZZ3jWMzBswIIN3gV LjU0BC8DqhHafvqzaAmMEilka/+bbsZ4BtYc4= Received: by 10.229.89.78 with SMTP id d14mr3860904qcm.251.1293018055630; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 03:40:55 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.88.9 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 03:40:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4D11DA76.32672.214EF771@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> From: Odhiambo Washington Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:40:25 +0300 Message-ID: To: utisoft@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Dave , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Well, I broke it! FreeBSD V8.1 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:40:56 -0000 On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Chris Rees wrote: > Your PATH isn't set. > > # fsck / > # mount -uw / > # /bin/sed -i.bak -e 's/^;//' /etc/rc.conf > > Or (can't remember where des is kept) > > # fsck /usr > # mount /usr > # /usr/bin/sed -i.bak -e 's/^;//' /etc/rc.conf > > For someone who asked a question like the OP, this is a too advanced to understand. "mount -u /" is almost enough unless he cold-booted the computer at some point. Yes, it's safe to do fsck I agree. Just tell the poster that it id necessary to edit /etc/rc.conf by doing xyz. -- Best regards, Odhiambo WASHINGTON, Nairobi,KE +254733744121/+254722743223 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ Damn!! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 22 11:41:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A66C106564A for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:41:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bf1783@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-yi0-f54.google.com (mail-yi0-f54.google.com [209.85.218.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC4308FC1A for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:41:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yie19 with SMTP id 19so690411yie.13 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 03:41:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:reply-to:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=e8konTnXyw6D0/iUk6s63Hy3/q0PG1rU0mhtOWouXGg=; b=DNaM+ng/gZa7IaC8j11vPHPX+RFL1P7Kj6r4alS1YaxYEHpRrEEiYJQG4G6hsdPe/k X7ojOPlMLLWOgKiy5IU3x5tfghCLcNjR6feulZU+viYp5Eg75XbPab383/vUxmFe0umB W5ywyBmqOs7bT0SC56aRoZ+ZlEJuoB+uAHolI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; b=vO0x9ionCAG324asRk7yxw0WVcMiXQTrNouuEalO5IauVhEL1XTSDjvt1P2ZEd0O3m 3fIpCqZhJI99G9mDNtAhiR2vRLl8tRg2zzpJhKDjs5e2hNGvX92wnZnyHBwNOuhm4Ts6 A9FvMZ/n1YFxpov4G+6s/wHZadi8vd3ChKcKA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.103.133 with SMTP id f5mr12804822yhg.14.1293018104068; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 03:41:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.236.95.40 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 03:41:44 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:41:44 +0000 Message-ID: From: "b. f." To: Dave Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Well, I broke it! FreeBSD V8.1 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: bf1783@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:41:45 -0000 dave wrote: ... >I was trying to disable the console screensaver, and found that in >sysinstall, there is no way to select "none" as an option. > >So I went and edited /etc/rc.conf to comment out the line:- >Saver="fire" (or whatever it is) > >I put a ; at the beginning of the line, and now FreeBSD wont come up, >showing an error (unexpected ;) and leaving me with a # prompt. > >How do I get to re-edit rc.conf, to correct the problem, as all command >line commands result in a "not found" error. You didn't provide much information, but probably what happened is that your defective rc.conf caused an error when booting, and your normal boot aborted and dropped into "single-user". This typically means that some partitions that are mounted by default during a normal boot and that contain editors and other programs are not initially mounted. So probably if you did something like: fsck -p / mount -uw / swapon -a mount -a you could then edit /etc/rc.conf with your favorite editor. Or you could just use sed, ed, or vi from /rescue, or from the release media, to make the necessary changes, rather than attempting to mount all partitions. > >Also. What's the "Correct" way to disable a console screensaver? > >Sysinstall alows you to select and enable one, but not remove it! On the fly, you can use vidcontrol -t ... To change the default setting, comment out or delete the "saver=..." line, or change it to saver="NO" which is what is originally in /etc/defaults/rc.conf. Sysinstall is only one tool you can use to install or configure the system. It's not necessary, and for minor changes like this, it's not the method of choice. b. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 22 11:52:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32C77106564A for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:52:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erikt@midgard.homeip.net) Received: from ch-smtp03.sth.basefarm.net (ch-smtp03.sth.basefarm.net [80.76.149.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8FD78FC12 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:52:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from c83-255-61-120.bredband.comhem.se ([83.255.61.120]:36440 helo=falcon.midgard.homeip.net) by ch-smtp03.sth.basefarm.net with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PVN1D-0006Mq-Cg for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:38:10 +0100 Received: (qmail 63651 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2010 12:38:04 +0100 Received: from owl.midgard.homeip.net (10.1.5.7) by falcon.midgard.homeip.net with ESMTP; 22 Dec 2010 12:38:04 +0100 Received: (qmail 58355 invoked by uid 1001); 22 Dec 2010 12:38:04 +0100 Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:38:04 +0100 From: Erik Trulsson To: Dave Message-ID: <20101222113804.GA58299@owl.midgard.homeip.net> References: <4D11DA76.32672.214EF771@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D11DA76.32672.214EF771@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Originating-IP: 83.255.61.120 X-Scan-Result: No virus found in message 1PVN1D-0006Mq-Cg. X-Scan-Signature: ch-smtp03.sth.basefarm.net 1PVN1D-0006Mq-Cg 15661cc8b276aa4749d35f5b87d99cf8 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Well, I broke it! FreeBSD V8.1 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:52:26 -0000 On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 11:01:10AM -0000, Dave wrote: > Hi... > > I was trying to disable the console screensaver, and found that in > sysinstall, there is no way to select "none" as an option. > > So I went and edited /etc/rc.conf to comment out the line:- > Saver="fire" (or whatever it is) > > I put a ; at the beginning of the line, and now FreeBSD wont come up, > showing an error (unexpected ;) and leaving me with a # prompt. To comment out a line in a shell script (which is what rc.conf actually is) you should put a '#' at the beginning of the line, not a ';'. > > How do I get to re-edit rc.conf, to correct the problem, as all command > line commands result in a "not found" error. > > Also. What's the "Correct" way to disable a console screensaver? Changing rc.conf is the "Correct" way. If you do it by hand or use some other tool (like sysinstall) to do it does not really matter. Putting 'saver="NO"' in rc.conf or not having and 'saver=XXXX' line there will both do the same thing - not starting any screen saver. > > Sysinstall alows you to select and enable one, but not remove it! > > Bit of an oversight that I suspect.... Probably. The shortcomings of sysinstall are many and varied, so one more is not surprise. -- Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 22 06:53:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C1B3106564A for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 06:53:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smathias1972@yahoo.com) Received: from web121401.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (web121401.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.90.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1AB508FC2A for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 06:53:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 29103 invoked by uid 60001); 22 Dec 2010 06:53:11 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1293000791; bh=IkUkPjZHBv2fS8n3mdSIwTdGkytr3IIyZmEyqvc+56I=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Xp8aX7VB9b78vJiiIUsN3y6+g60owoCsNJqxV8aHUXwI99bNFAaTbFg5vXiv+eSTH5YvFWKCFH2z1VRPWpVXGcl2utaMP7DTpE2wpBiUyw4nZDtu2aETRXyeayUmpGAa+UqNUnrvQjvQTJKamf76cqFSV1u220c/mFFbu+8UQPg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=CCEhpLmMtV50HAWaK6g587NAltsD4XTwEny+wVJJOk+lOtsQyS90DOFZV14GAU+xefZxoFz3FLk2RRdMbV8SFKk4Ns8SRl1X/fa1iuAnasRtXHX6PaEiAdI3R6JY8/POUQwToYEIofXEScJuBCn7qRO5SngtF1pqPcZxEPPrMM0=; Message-ID: <353856.29096.qm@web121401.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: 2MGo2tgVM1nATq.d1owsD6aOCBZqi7OqA3RWijFHU3lN7s1 OIpUp4d.83619SgfmyNYV95aYapn6MQdrxY3L..Hty_jiumn_5HkIc4AXdr2 lNpD_IlFo3bYbuom1qohiEFZbfPWxXrrS1RMxHGWhvZyguFk6f1b9fLlknVp ugYM26El_vxqSiwhIi8GCWyP6OVOZoiKA5nYwrpifJljv2kHxqhMxVx3LGgP dK3CVMwR7k2iV7fF9NSJs7A-- Received: from [94.21.214.172] by web121401.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 21 Dec 2010 22:53:11 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.20 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 22:53:11 -0800 (PST) From: S Mathias To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:13:48 +0000 Subject: do i need a dedicated ip address for https? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 06:53:12 -0000 http://help.godaddy.com/article/1054 "# Set up SSL protection on your website." is it an inescapable requirement to have a dedicated [not fix] ip address, when i want to use ssl on my domain? thank you happy Christmas! :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 22 12:33:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CAEE106566B for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:33:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@g8kbv.demon.co.uk) Received: from lon1-post-2.mail.demon.net (lon1-post-2.mail.demon.net [195.173.77.149]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2555A8FC13 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:33:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.225.127.64] (helo=[192.168.33.1]) by lon1-post-2.mail.demon.net with esmtpa (AUTH g8kbv) (Exim 4.69) id 1PVNsr-0002jB-Zc for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:33:33 +0000 From: "Dave" To: bf1783@googlemail.com> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:33:32 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <4D11F01C.16225.21A38699@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> Priority: normal In-reply-to: References: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.52) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Well, I broke it! FreeBSD V8.1 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:33:34 -0000 On 22 Dec 2010 at 11:41, b. f. wrote: > dave wrote: > ... > >I was trying to disable the console screensaver, and found that in > >sysinstall, there is no way to select "none" as an option. > > > >So I went and edited /etc/rc.conf to comment out the line:- > >Saver="fire" (or whatever it is) > > > >I put a ; at the beginning of the line, and now FreeBSD wont come up, > >showing an error (unexpected ;) and leaving me with a # prompt. > > > >How do I get to re-edit rc.conf, to correct the problem, as all > >command line commands result in a "not found" error. > > You didn't provide much information, but probably what happened is > that your defective rc.conf caused an error when booting, and your > normal boot aborted and dropped into "single-user". This typically > means that some partitions that are mounted by default during a normal > boot and that contain editors and other programs are not initially > mounted. So probably if you did something like: > > fsck -p / > mount -uw / > swapon -a > mount -a > > you could then edit /etc/rc.conf with your favorite editor. Or you > could just use sed, ed, or vi from /rescue, or from the release media, > to make the necessary changes, rather than attempting to mount all > partitions. > > > > >Also. What's the "Correct" way to disable a console screensaver? > > > >Sysinstall alows you to select and enable one, but not remove it! > > On the fly, you can use vidcontrol -t ... > > To change the default setting, comment out or delete the "saver=..." > line, or change it to > > saver="NO" > > which is what is originally in /etc/defaults/rc.conf. > > Sysinstall is only one tool you can use to install or configure the > system. It's not necessary, and for minor changes like this, it's not > the method of choice. > > b. > Thank you Sir, it's back working again, with no screen saver. Thank's also to others who responded, much apprecaited. I'll be back later, now I can see the error messages that were hidden behind the saver when something burped, only becoming visible as the otherwise stalled machine shutdown on one short press of the power key.. I just need to wait now for the trouble to manifest itself again. Cheers All Dave B. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 22 12:37:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 077F7106567A for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:37:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nr1c0re@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B88CC8FC20 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:37:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so4846792qwj.13 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 04:37:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=vB2zFIcTuq2gi5+uNkmC6synpLZAj0nBrLruXSPvNDc=; b=s5JdnGQZqfISE0Xs56iZ3X2AQLAuksb9sWlFNoz0TUcwGJPU1KjFiaUHP3oiG/Ho17 a4nXjSTgO9vw8rKwU3ki28iV+NVzNnRYKEaOIgMrILZvOKEjj2w9XBorTmG+LJtBi1PX gk+KenMoTNFnNzKEBUQp+MUnJlw9Igh2GRJ1Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=gGgEXNgxrbQ5Sby09vLgE6uMQaRrv7HWcY9n2xvHeoDUi8Qmw08mwSmRZi5tumaGKQ c6LcKOVVDMOx3KXElthadpNJl3KG0cCsgIDTBoNBB0k9dCWP3OsGTmJ9sB+gBtZUM+w5 VH5bTYBtkbrHbNV72IvHECzsii4+6rRo6bs0E= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.217.69 with SMTP id hl5mr3907255qcb.59.1293021464037; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 04:37:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.89.3 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 04:37:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <353856.29096.qm@web121401.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <353856.29096.qm@web121401.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 15:37:43 +0300 Message-ID: From: c0re To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: do i need a dedicated ip address for https? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:37:45 -0000 2010/12/22 S Mathias : > http://help.godaddy.com/article/1054 > > "# Set up SSL protection on your website." > > is it an inescapable requirement to have a dedicated [not fix] ip address, when i want to use ssl on my domain? > > thank you > > happy Christmas! :) > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > mod_gnutls can do 'Server Name Indication' and mod_ssl with apache_2.2 should do it too https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34607 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=776281 But hoster may not use mod_gnutls or not recent version of apache, so it may not support multiple ssl with single IP. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 22 12:55:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F9B6106564A for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:55:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gandalf@shopzeus.com) Received: from 10610.x.rootbsd.net (10610.x.rootbsd.net [204.109.60.69]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A2FF8FC08 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:55:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.105] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by 10610.x.rootbsd.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oBMCcs79093587 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:38:54 GMT (envelope-from gandalf@shopzeus.com) Message-ID: <4D11F114.5050301@shopzeus.com> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:37:40 +0100 From: Laszlo Nagy User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <353856.29096.qm@web121401.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <353856.29096.qm@web121401.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: do i need a dedicated ip address for https? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:55:13 -0000 On 2010-12-22 07:53, S Mathias wrote: > http://help.godaddy.com/article/1054 > > "# Set up SSL protection on your website." > > is it an inescapable requirement to have a dedicated [not fix] ip address, when i want to use ssl on my domain? Obviously, you cannot have a website without an IP address. Another strict rule is that you can only use one SSL certificate per IP address + PORT. This is determined by the SSL protocol, and you cannot do anything to change it. But there are possibilities. You can use different SSL certificates for the same ip address and different port numbers: https://your_domain_1:4430 https://your_domain_2:4431 etc. (where your_domain_1 and your_domain_2 have the same IP, and you have different certificates from them). You can also use many host names with the same IP address and port number, but they will have to share the same SSL certificate. It is not a problem, if they are subdomains, and you own a wildcard certificate. Example: https://sub1.yourdomain.com https://sub2.yourdomain.com https://sub3.yourdomain.com etc. (where you have a wildcard certificate for *.yourdomain.com) And finally, it is possible to use different domains and the same port, without wildcard certificate or subdomains, but then all connecting clients will complain about the problem (e.g. certificate belongs to a domain that differs from the one you are connecting to.) For any serious projects, this is not recommended. You cannot expect customers sending you private information on a website that cannot identify itself... Best, Laszlo From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 22 13:04:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4F49106566B for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:04:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pdegoeje@service2media.com) Received: from mail90.messagelabs.com (mail90.messagelabs.com [85.158.139.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F4778FC1C for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:04:14 +0000 (UTC) X-VirusChecked: Checked X-Env-Sender: pdegoeje@service2media.com X-Msg-Ref: server-2.tower-90.messagelabs.com!1293021450!14693010!22 X-StarScan-Version: 6.2.9; banners=-,-,- X-Originating-IP: [217.28.130.38] Received: (qmail 19722 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2010 12:37:34 -0000 Received: from hostedexchange.hostedservice.com (HELO outlook.hostedservice2.net) (217.28.130.38) by server-2.tower-90.messagelabs.com with RC4-SHA encrypted SMTP; 22 Dec 2010 12:37:34 -0000 Received: from pieter-dev.localnet (217.114.102.131) by smtp.hostedservice2.net (192.168.16.123) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:37:13 +0000 From: Pieter de Goeje Organization: Service2Media To: Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:37:30 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (Linux/2.6.32-5-amd64; KDE/4.4.5; x86_64; ; ) References: <353856.29096.qm@web121401.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <353856.29096.qm@web121401.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <201012221337.31158.pdegoeje@service2media.com> Cc: S Mathias Subject: Re: do i need a dedicated ip address for https? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:04:16 -0000 On Wednesday 22 December 2010 07:53:11 S Mathias wrote: > is it an inescapable requirement to have a dedicated [not fix] ip address, > when i want to use ssl on my domain? It's only necessary if you want to use name based virtual hosts with a different SSL certificate for each virtual host. This is most likely the case on a shared hosting provider like godaddy. The problem is that the clients set up the SSL connection before they send the HTTP request (which contains the name of the virtual host), so the server has no way of knowing which certificate it should present to the client. > happy Christmas! :) Happy Christmas indeed! - Pieter From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 22 13:07:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50C66106564A for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:07:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6E158FC12 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:07:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C534E63D4; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:07:27 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from :to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=8ijqesPF6Azc XugrECQyicrsjt4=; b=ACGBUjCxEfc+6P1lvcedAjfynDtxi2izJY1+ytxgZexT FKVpJ2cgE+E32mYNA6gtoO6qq3Znx1QqGLehFDFEy8uziny2m2xNsQuua+5yiBta o48yf6gZrITPcyOwr85ku4JoleKI2JCpYf9mZYmn91x+moPAYk3/Po5+CxI5nso= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from:to :cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=JqT1rC ejbE9abtugeX7GwKNyocQOlneVCMGvDf5aSkOVSI/Ja1NupwhPtAeHxuzuAtPiGj Nh1F2Bq7yVVMnb8w2xHpV2EZksMvIvcCwnZZPQnEhdk/boZ9KXAyQitbXuG0s8UL FCCf98dYbVs69h157r3fFkt9OwpJmsIslOT18= Received: from unknown (client-86-29-47-22.glfd.adsl.virginmedia.com [86.29.47.22]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B2160E63D0; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:07:26 +0000 (GMT) Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:07:11 +0000 From: Bruce Cran To: "Dave" Message-ID: <20101222130711.00006546@unknown> In-Reply-To: <4D11DA76.32672.214EF771@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> References: <4D11DA76.32672.214EF771@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.16.0; i586-pc-mingw32msvc) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Well, I broke it! FreeBSD V8.1 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:07:28 -0000 On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:01:10 -0000 "Dave" wrote: > Sysinstall alows you to select and enable one, but not remove it! > > Bit of an oversight that I suspect.... Fixed in r216651 :) -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 22 13:53:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FF3F106564A for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:53:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remorse@partners.org) Received: from phsmgmx14.partners.org (phsmgmx14.partners.org [155.52.251.75]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D53C38FC17 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:53:10 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlYGAL6KEU2Et5wS/2dsb2JhbACVfo4Zc8MHhUkEhGY Received: from hedwig.mgh.harvard.edu ([132.183.156.18]) by phsmgmx14-out.partners.org with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 22 Dec 2010 08:23:56 -0500 Received: from buxtehude.mgh.harvard.edu (buxtehude.mgh.harvard.edu [132.183.156.105]) by hedwig.mgh.harvard.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBMDNuZJ001451 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 08:23:56 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from remorse@partners.org) From: Richard Morse Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 08:23:56 -0500 Message-Id: To: questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Subject: FreeBSD crashes X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:53:11 -0000 Hi! A while back I wrote about some problems I was having with FreeBSD cras= hing randomly. I then disappeared for a while, due to a variety of issues, = but I'm still having problems. The computer in question is a general-purpose server -- it runs listservs, = websites, databases (both MySQL and PostgreSQL), and Amanda to back up a fe= w other computers. None of this is high volume -- load averages are all les= s than 1. It has two Intel Xeon processors, with a total of 16 virtual cpus. It runs = FreeBSD 8.1, using the amd64 branch in order to access 12G of RAM. It has a= n Adaptec 5805 RAID card, and is using the Adaptec aac driver 2.2.9-17911 (= which is also the flashed BIOS version), and has one array, which is a RAID= 10 array. Note that I'm not using the aacu driver, but most of the crashes= happened when I was. Based on the randomness of the crashes, I suspect that it's a hardware prob= lem. I have tried to enable core dumps, but it has never succeeded in actua= lly writing one out -- it looks like it has a second crash when it tries to= save the core. This leads me to suspect that it might be a problem with th= e RAID card, but I'm not sure. Is there some way that I can use the information provided during the kernel= panics to determine where the problem is? I have photographs of almost all= of them. There are a few crashes that didn't result in kernel panics; inst= ead there were a few gibberish characters (from the >128 ASCII codes) on th= e screen. I have pictures of these as well. Thanks for any suggestions, Ricky The information in this e-mail is intended only for the person to whom it is addressed. If you believe this e-mail was sent to you in error and the e-ma= il contains patient information, please contact the Partners Compliance HelpLi= ne at http://www.partners.org/complianceline . If the e-mail was sent to you in e= rror but does not contain patient information, please contact the sender and pro= perly dispose of the e-mail. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 22 14:18:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01B6E1065694 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:18:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BF9C8FC13 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:18:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from russet.local (reflex.squiz.co.uk [83.217.109.164]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBMEI6a8043008 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:18:27 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk oBMEI6a8043008 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1293027508; bh=sq1M247Bt6S+gNrvMNy5pMxcag3k6SjnTh2ciuvQ5jE=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4D120895.2060002@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20W ed,=2022=20Dec=202010=2014:17:57=20+0000|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0=20(M acintosh=3B=20U=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B=20en-US=3B=20r v:1.9.2.13)=20Gecko/20101207=20Thunderbird/3.1.7|MIME-Version:=201 .0|To:=20freebsd-questions@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20Port=20bas ed=20VLAN|References:=20|In-Reply-To:=20|X-Enigmail-Version:=201.1.1|Content-Type:=20mul tipart/signed=3B=20micalg=3Dpgp-sha1=3B=0D=0A=20protocol=3D"applic ation/pgp-signature"=3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3D"------------enigCDA259 ACC51800C69AD08D5A"; b=jcI8zKMb6mJ68yHvqCeNvxNetiEM3HxRv5gXvA76BM8cWN9xhQYd6MVzb88WH/vTt Z10h6GGC6ga79UtwoA2Fi7a8EYoLH7f8HSD4XHLiTjxUnco/C3X86sqhuG6vSCV9uV 3qgKON5vBmV1DZHWACWOFGfpCeGMk3By481DFp4s= X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host reflex.squiz.co.uk [83.217.109.164] claimed to be russet.local Message-ID: <4D120895.2060002@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:17:57 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigCDA259ACC51800C69AD08D5A" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.5 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: Port based VLAN X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:18:32 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigCDA259ACC51800C69AD08D5A Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 22/12/2010 11:15, Indexer wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I plan to make a FreeBSD based router sometime soon. I would like to be= able to do port based vlanning on the router, so that a client computer = that plugs into that socket is "dumb" to the vlans' existance. >=20 > IE >=20 > em0 - untagged > em1 - vlan 1 > em2 - vlan 2 >=20 > Is what i want to achieve (as a simple example). This way i can use unm= anaged switches on em2, and all clients behind that are to the router on = vlan2 >=20 > How does one go about this on freebsd. >=20 In /etc/rc.conf: ifconfig_em1=3D"up -vlanhwtag" # You may or may not want hwtag -- try bot= h vlans_em1=3D"vlan1" ifconfig_em2=3D'up -vlanhwtag" vlans_em2=3D"vlan2" create_args_vlan1=3D"vlan 1" ipv4_addrs_vlan1=3D"192.168.12.34/24" create_args_vlan2=3D"vlan 2" ipv4_addrs_vlan2=3D"192.168.56.78/24" The em0 i/f should be configured as usual. This will create virtual interfaces vlan1 and vlan2 which you can apply firewall rules to etc. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigCDA259ACC51800C69AD08D5A Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk0SCJsACgkQ8Mjk52CukIydiQCfVgyrrlsmtpn96xSUwJLBDOtL 0dQAnR42f+S/tMcdNyaFa9ICLS3lmF40 =gfC/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigCDA259ACC51800C69AD08D5A-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 22 14:21:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F029106564A for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:21:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hedayati.mo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A0858FC12 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:21:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so4871921wwf.31 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 06:21:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=XugPA61ue9bFJvndzjmkfK55GAogfC7LPMRksP5C4uw=; b=GKzPOzolD6PwmYnU2HmCKVvxFqvcLCeRbZPUj027TlpYBj9+vHTU/HfHaXoJ8qOXKk hiRoVWv1kmKDhOTADXOeqX5oDrp7AyS5wIBEoFxLa6oEbcgBhXb3EN+TOHIsA/xCDlgG copyqBpC3rYc180A6Yd8tQYK3jqMUB1e6W+Kk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=dhtLZE2HjVTQq8ab0+pyAtyJXsGC2BJtRfJqgkxzZ5x5NFkJTmt8aRFeHitQqk3SEy DyVPqrVUNQ1VMrP794jtM75m+Fc1x3hXazTnaUCI5EYkpTEVhGoNbeL0ealJ6j9O9kTZ zXB/mu1NDru7DwiAhghiYmTAvCJ0ZgjsLqm58= Received: by 10.227.134.10 with SMTP id h10mr4273579wbt.118.1293027659996; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 06:20:59 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.143.202 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 06:20:19 -0800 (PST) From: Mohammad Hedayati Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 17:50:19 +0330 Message-ID: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: DES Cipher X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:21:01 -0000 Can anyone please show me a sample code for ciphering using DES in FreeBSD? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 22 14:31:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0267D1065672 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:31:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: from dirj.bris.ac.uk (dirj.bris.ac.uk [137.222.10.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B21778FC14 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:31:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ncsc.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.10.41]) by dirj.bris.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PVPjK-0007bw-6K; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:31:50 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk ([137.222.187.241]) by ncsc.bris.ac.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PVPjK-0000NM-2W; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:31:50 +0000 Received: from mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBMEVn17056547; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:31:49 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) Received: (from mexas@localhost) by mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oBMEVntp056538; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:31:49 GMT (envelope-from mexas@bristol.ac.uk) X-Authentication-Warning: mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk: mexas set sender to mexas@bristol.ac.uk using -f Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:31:49 +0000 From: Anton Shterenlikht To: Mohammad Hedayati Message-ID: <20101222143149.GA51879@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> Mail-Followup-To: Mohammad Hedayati , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DES Cipher X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:31:52 -0000 On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 05:50:19PM +0330, Mohammad Hedayati wrote: > Can anyone please show me a sample code for ciphering using DES in FreeBSD? bdes(1)? % ls -al > zzz % bdes < zzz > zzz.des Enter key: % -- Anton Shterenlikht Room 2.6, Queen's Building Mech Eng Dept Bristol University University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 22 14:32:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FDD710656CA for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:32:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7416E8FC19 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:32:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from russet.local (reflex.squiz.co.uk [83.217.109.164]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBMEW34t043193 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:32:03 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk oBMEW34t043193 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1293028324; bh=3dQtidF969uSZWGNB238YHpKvz9OTTA5uNcPXO6LEgo=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4D120BDC.1050009@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20W ed,=2022=20Dec=202010=2014:31:56=20+0000|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman= 20|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0=20(M acintosh=3B=20U=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B=20en-US=3B=20r v:1.9.2.13)=20Gecko/20101207=20Thunderbird/3.1.7|MIME-Version:=201 .0|To:=20freebsd-questions@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20DES=20Ciph er|References:=20|In-Reply-To:=20|X-Enigmail-Version:=201.1.1|Content-Type :=20multipart/signed=3B=20micalg=3Dpgp-sha1=3B=0D=0A=20protocol=3D "application/pgp-signature"=3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3D"------------eni gB3D0977FD4E9AF03BCB596FB"; b=AxUp1YoklbItaxOu6O+Yf9GiltjHRk4++RnGXu+JGluxnzR1t3NZqnKD8AE4GA7+T O9cH2PEy0lDrhKYC5KVyCFwv6E1fOCavjkSHzZovzfOyt6TS6++Bx/7Z8sPMyaN18a VUBVYdKQnWBUwk5ThDMexvMwyKVpZjSSFRxSmEAw= X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host reflex.squiz.co.uk [83.217.109.164] claimed to be russet.local Message-ID: <4D120BDC.1050009@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:31:56 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enigB3D0977FD4E9AF03BCB596FB" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.5 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_50,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: DES Cipher X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:32:08 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enigB3D0977FD4E9AF03BCB596FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 22/12/2010 14:20, Mohammad Hedayati wrote: > Can anyone please show me a sample code for ciphering using DES in Free= BSD? To encrypt, something like: openssl enc -e -des -in plaintext.txt -a -out encrypted.asc Decrypt like so: openssl enc -d -dex -in encrypted.asc -a -out plaintext.txt Note: completely untested. You may well need to supply various extra arguments to make it all work. See 'openssl enc help' for hints. Note 2: DES is pretty trivial to crack nowadays. Don't use this for anything serious. You can encrypt using AES or any of a host of other ciphers by using a very similar openssl command line. Note 3: If you're actually after DES "encrypted" passwords, then see crypt(3). From the commandline you can use the Perl crypt function: 'perldoc -f crypt' for details. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enigB3D0977FD4E9AF03BCB596FB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.14 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk0SC+MACgkQ8Mjk52CukIw0DgCfVbp6NC9mvSbwnFLhZsDAdz1Y qKoAmwbYjM7BFSFEJaVYW2Mg8kpAE4X7 =v7mn -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enigB3D0977FD4E9AF03BCB596FB-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 22 14:36:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7036B1065679 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:36:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hedayati.mo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 043698FC17 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:36:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so4886296wwf.31 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 06:36:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=2JK7himT2Iz3Xgux0L+047kkgpg/PRvSZNnJIbtfdgI=; b=QpfuEUnyQDfd4wmoTnG3wl6Igx97jsoeROByy4m7UvxqTW3iFGd/1TZuBWxxd82cGB bivX84ZiZfvXvBCeOrBiM4AS70xA6YXlxdMJVdlDLY6Bs5RNXKb/rPuzZkcc+tCRzWd9 NLX/p6OuLPoqbe6oqk+h1uNSLwfkFKJWim708= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=HaHioSaDQspg6YhwGbLRZClVEfCQsouZ6Ifq345b33R/H3W1cJsj4t45p/cprR4cIJ KGsxVu8m8KXupU21K+G2H1jF2RPI42opvAgoevhufmdwOFTtrNvqzf/8sS3pAe7yyCWd jGbkll0vmUVL3/w71KEE8U7AwDEkea1Q4Y95k= Received: by 10.227.132.200 with SMTP id c8mr4273300wbt.31.1293028597833; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 06:36:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.143.202 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 06:35:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101222143149.GA51879@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <20101222143149.GA51879@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> From: Mohammad Hedayati Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 18:05:57 +0330 Message-ID: To: Mohammad Hedayati , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: Subject: Re: DES Cipher X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:36:39 -0000 On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 05:50:19PM +0330, Mohammad Hedayati wrote: >> Can anyone please show me a sample code for ciphering using DES in FreeBSD? > > bdes(1)? > > % ls -al > zzz > % bdes < zzz > zzz.des > Enter key: > % > > -- > Anton Shterenlikht > Room 2.6, Queen's Building > Mech Eng Dept > Bristol University > University Walk, Bristol BS8 1TR, UK > Tel: +44 (0)117 331 5944 > Fax: +44 (0)117 929 4423 > no, des(3) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 22 14:44:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 830EC106566C for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:44:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1-6.sentex.ca [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EC138FC12 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:44:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:5570:ff31:c40c:8eac] ([IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:5570:ff31:c40c:8eac]) by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBMEi3n0045965 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 22 Dec 2010 09:44:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net) Message-ID: <4D120EB1.5020808@sentex.net> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 09:44:01 -0500 From: Mike Tancsa User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Mohammad Hedayati References: <20101222143149.GA51879@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: DES Cipher X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:44:05 -0000 On 12/22/2010 9:35 AM, Mohammad Hedayati wrote: > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Anton Shterenlikht wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 05:50:19PM +0330, Mohammad Hedayati wrote: >>> Can anyone please show me a sample code for ciphering using DES in FreeBSD? >> >> bdes(1)? >> >> % ls -al > zzz >> % bdes < zzz > zzz.des >> Enter key: >> % >> > > no, des(3) /usr/src/crypto/openssl/crypto/des ---Mike From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 22 14:50:08 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E38106566C for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:50:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f51.google.com (mail-ew0-f51.google.com [209.85.215.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3103D8FC18 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:50:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so2750167ewy.10 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 06:50:07 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.15.146 with SMTP id k18mr82742eba.38.1293029406950; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 06:50:06 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.112.145 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 06:49:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101222130711.00006546@unknown> References: <4D11DA76.32672.214EF771@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> <20101222130711.00006546@unknown> From: Chris Brennan Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 09:49:46 -0500 Message-ID: To: Bruce Cran Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Dave , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Well, I broke it! FreeBSD V8.1 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:50:08 -0000 On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Bruce Cran wrote: > On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:01:10 -0000 > "Dave" wrote: > > > Sysinstall alows you to select and enable one, but not remove it! > > > > Bit of an oversight that I suspect.... > > Fixed in r216651 :) > IIRC ';' isn't a valid bash comment ... (which has been previously discussed elsewhere). It's usually safer to use '#' for comment in /etc/rc.conf and other system config files as they typically use BASH style structs. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 22 15:15:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74F631065679 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 15:15:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd.user@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com (mail-gx0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21CEF8FC0A for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 15:15:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk28 with SMTP id 28so4513869gxk.17 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 07:15:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.150.143.2 with SMTP id q2mr10716684ybd.46.1293030906185; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 07:15:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-071-070-216-068.nc.res.rr.com [71.70.216.68]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id u10sm8992909yba.13.2010.12.22.07.15.04 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 22 Dec 2010 07:15:05 -0800 (PST) Received: from scorpio (zeus [192.168.1.1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: FreeBSD.user@scorpio.seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ED3E3E5485F for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 10:15:03 -0500 (EST) Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 10:15:03 -0500 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Message-ID: <20101222101503.6809b761@scorpio> In-Reply-To: References: <4D11DA76.32672.214EF771@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> <20101222130711.00006546@unknown> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEUeH4oAAI3//v8LDHmw s8gyNZ/b3ej7+vn+/v////+PjIc8Plaj/TnQAAACNElEQVQ4jaXUvW/aQBQAcFtKGZLFT+YY 3D1SR9SKoRMncE3IggU4kicGi1JYOgQwyYrgnLlSzhsoNkTuVJEp+ef6ztiAoV3aJ+QPfufn s987S/5fQvoXYPjztmfc514Ks+5JfGUCfrzt4+VabF+jwEV4DGEXN8N4p16sPLxHX07/V3qX yfF5D2H6K4V8j9NkyAphvkjBembD5PDFk3zeTzP1jcksyaV9w+d4ELmUoOp8N2p8uQVyhTAT uawnKNH2mie5lJp48mscUcbJUvg0mR6APwAoye9AMyWozY4gAh0vcxa5FJ4TKCuODESWtfkB 8AEQSupUXNIYH8FSC2w8X3eMBNbbVJpJ7MgECO5yJ9DUEWCYkzNAlsRsgwLQ1GkWqELbkDOh 1bUzoHagYkNh9MXlK/MQoA42gTxz2bhPM2DJedm8MZx6cNfJgEZJ5cmwPp5FZ/Ye8O2qTrFV dgOrHkZRBoheJiGrRquwAhnQ6GeTePPerWVmQelAQ5lwNqtvQd2lcooAV74/zR1BIRS19fy5 ru+B/8ReW9pYKMPjt609zDaitHHTGOO+Zu7gHvsKE7XbeE1QVuJXomIFuZgUJdXQdhpqEELc /e8RLjfi+cQ01yMdWot8UcCVxEWHEkcUrsDGuhaIEoM9kfgAR6jxHcmEV7tNURAl8KTHN9iF McKGFHGO62O62UMpbmlVuogQ7ndL8zXCiLeBy3xpfrqaXS/+AHDG4o8AvhuPeezD/3xL/hy/ Adjlg2odglF2AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: Well, I broke it! FreeBSD V8.1 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 15:15:07 -0000 On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 09:49:46 -0500 Chris Brennan articulated: > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Bruce Cran wrote: > > > On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:01:10 -0000 > > "Dave" wrote: > > > > > Sysinstall alows you to select and enable one, but not remove it! > > > > > > Bit of an oversight that I suspect.... > > > > Fixed in r216651 :) > > IIRC ';' isn't a valid bash comment ... (which has been previously > discussed elsewhere). It's usually safer to use '#' for comment > in /etc/rc.conf and other system config files as they typically use > BASH style structs. If you want to insert a really long comment block: : << IMPORTANT mumble bla bla bla ... IMPORTANT You can pretty much put anything you want between the: : << IMPORTANT and IMPORTANT tags. You don't have to use "IMPORTANT" either. It works with Bash; however, I am unsure of how it works with other shells. Unless you have a really long comment block, I think the "#" syntax is easier to use. Plus, I don't know if it would even work in an "rc" file. -- Jerry ✌ FreeBSD.user@seibercom.net Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ When taxes are due, Americans tend to feel quite bled-white and blue. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 22 15:17:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8931C106564A for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 15:17:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nvidican@m2.vidican.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16A038FC15 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 15:17:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so4923908wwf.31 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 07:17:03 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.17.202 with SMTP id j52mr10680064wej.36.1293031022937; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 07:17:02 -0800 (PST) Sender: nvidican@m2.vidican.com Received: by 10.216.188.18 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 07:17:02 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [136.1.1.105] In-Reply-To: <4D120895.2060002@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <4D120895.2060002@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 10:17:02 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ZiWeGmSNGmg-c57wsYr1d6y0q5s Message-ID: From: Nathan Vidican To: Matthew Seaman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Port based VLAN X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 15:17:04 -0000 On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 9:17 AM, Matthew Seaman < m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> wrote: > On 22/12/2010 11:15, Indexer wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I plan to make a FreeBSD based router sometime soon. I would like to be > able to do port based vlanning on the router, so that a client computer that > plugs into that socket is "dumb" to the vlans' existance. > > > > IE > > > > em0 - untagged > > em1 - vlan 1 > > em2 - vlan 2 > > > > Is what i want to achieve (as a simple example). This way i can use > unmanaged switches on em2, and all clients behind that are to the router on > vlan2 > > > > How does one go about this on freebsd. > > > > In /etc/rc.conf: > > ifconfig_em1="up -vlanhwtag" # You may or may not want hwtag -- try both > vlans_em1="vlan1" > ifconfig_em2='up -vlanhwtag" > vlans_em2="vlan2" > > create_args_vlan1="vlan 1" > ipv4_addrs_vlan1="192.168.12.34/24" > > create_args_vlan2="vlan 2" > ipv4_addrs_vlan2="192.168.56.78/24" > > The em0 i/f should be configured as usual. This will create virtual > interfaces vlan1 and vlan2 which you can apply firewall rules to etc. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > -- > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard > Flat 3 > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate > JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW > > I do this exact thing, where a single server port attaches to the switch as a trunk and carries multiple VLANS which are in-turn firewalled and routed amongst one another, my rc.conf (the pertinent parts anyways) looks like this: gateway_enable="YES" cloned_interfaces="vlan1 vlan190 vlan100 vlan200 vlan300 vlan400" ifconfig_em0="up" ifconfig_vlan1="up" ifconfig_vlan190="inet X.X.190.1/28 vlan 190 vlandev em0" ifconfig_vlan100="inet 10.0.1.1/26 vlan 100 vlandev em0" ifconfig_vlan200="inet 10.0.2.254/24 vlan 200 vlandev em0" ifconfig_vlan300="inet 10.0.3.254/24 vlan 300 vlandev em0" ifconfig_vlan400="inet 10.0.4.1/28 vlan 4 vlandev em0" firewall_enable="YES" Within my rc.firewall, the interfaces are vlan1, vlan190, vlan100, etc... the system sees each as if it were physically a different network card and I'm able to route/filter traffic as such. Note: I did have to add vlan support in my kernel for this, I'm using Intel 1000MT 1000BaseSX (fiber) card to a Cisco Catalyst 2948 which in turn connects on the other side as a trunked port. -- Nathan Vidican nathan@vidican.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 22 15:54:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DACF106566B for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 15:54:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (ns2.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7A678FC13 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 15:54:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.3/rdb1) id oBMFs2ub015968 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 09:54:02 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 09:54:02 -0600 (CST) From: Robert Bonomi Message-ID: <201012221554.oBMFs2ub015968@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Well, I broke it! FreeBSD V8.1 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 15:54:05 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Dec 22 05:01:28 2010 > From: "Dave" > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:01:10 -0000 > Subject: Well, I broke it! FreeBSD V8.1 release > > Hi... > > I was trying to disable the console screensaver, and found that in > sysinstall, there is no way to select "none" as an option. > > So I went and edited /etc/rc.conf to comment out the line:- > Saver="fire" (or whatever it is) > > I put a ; at the beginning of the line, and now FreeBSD wont come up, > showing an error (unexpected ;) and leaving me with a # prompt. It's rogt. you did wrong;. Should have been a '#', not a ';' > > How do I get to re-edit rc.conf, to correct the problem, as all command > line commands result in a "not found" error. # fsck -p || fsck # mount -a # vi /etc/rc.conf { or editor of your choice } # reboot > Also. What's the "Correct" way to disable a console screensaver? # vidcontrol -t off see 'man splash' From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 22 16:03:11 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A47B1065679 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 16:03:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com) Received: from mail.r-bonomi.com (ns2.r-bonomi.com [204.87.227.129]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA5578FC1D for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 16:03:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from bonomi@localhost) by mail.r-bonomi.com (8.14.3/rdb1) id oBMG3AnT016020; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 10:03:10 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 10:03:10 -0600 (CST) From: Robert Bonomi Message-ID: <201012221603.oBMG3AnT016020@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, hedayati.mo@gmail.com Cc: Subject: Re: DES Cipher X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 16:03:11 -0000 > From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Wed Dec 22 08:22:15 2010 > From: Mohammad Hedayati > Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 17:50:19 +0330 > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: DES Cipher > > Can anyone please show me a sample code for ciphering using DES in FreeBSD? I hate to say it, but RTFM applies. 'apropos encryption' gives, among other things (and first), a cite to bdes(1). 'bdes' is a program that comes with the FreeBSD distribution. You have access to the source code of all of the distribution. 'Use the Souce, Luke" applies, and will bring the mountain to Mohammad. :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 22 16:21:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E85C106566B for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 16:21:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hedayati.mo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B76AF8FC0A for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 16:21:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so4985690wwf.31 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 08:21:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=WKSZWTN8zoHjH8hm9Ffb9Os23561b2FqnNtoFnZ+BcM=; b=fQaIdB0sp2dvdXDcZpbXiqkzQP+cpWHzuIMTf08pw1CmCjtFBSeqIw6JmnTac8Nnie mzSISNJKDod5fnM4dnWeeRn5Ol9Ra3z1euG7hQ6a6XFeuu7LnwAj4ODrrb9g7VqxshCf Rvg371NCdCJ7rd1UU/SqrDfuED4v7AK+Cwkh0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=aJZgonX4vJNvitWF8yfidmY3Lxx1GKvn/tqPQYYaAWeFeYdpLGWeT4ojvb6im9deAR xIEBroO3ld4d/ws2BjZGbhsUyPh/BbGVYOCc6A3wELuaglJV95K7u9UYKyvzY5s1AEze IGrnNeUjtC4wPRo9iZCixeSA6aAbahFci2KYM= Received: by 10.227.132.200 with SMTP id c8mr4340515wbt.31.1293034876568; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 08:21:16 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.143.202 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 08:20:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201012221603.oBMG3AnT016020@mail.r-bonomi.com> References: <201012221603.oBMG3AnT016020@mail.r-bonomi.com> From: Mohammad Hedayati Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 19:50:36 +0330 Message-ID: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: DES Cipher X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 16:21:18 -0000 On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 7:33 PM, Robert Bonomi w= rote: > >> From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org =C2=A0Wed Dec 22 08:22:15 2010 >> From: Mohammad Hedayati >> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 17:50:19 +0330 >> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org >> Subject: DES Cipher >> >> Can anyone please show me a sample code for ciphering using DES in FreeB= SD? > > I hate to say it, but RTFM applies. > 'apropos encryption' gives, among other things (and first), a cite to bde= s(1). > > 'bdes' is a program that comes with the FreeBSD distribution. > You have access to the source code of all of the distribution. > > 'Use the Souce, Luke" applies, and will bring the mountain to Mohammad. := ) > > > Thanks Robert, I haven't seen a cite to bdes in the FM of des(3), but the problem is solved using the source of bdes(1) [thanks to Antone]. The code would be as easy as: #include int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { DES_key_schedule schedule; DES_cblock key; strncpy(key, "somekey", 8); =09 DES_set_key(&key, &schedule); =09 DES_cblock buf; strncpy(buf, "sometxt", 8); =09 // Encrypting DES_ecb_encrypt(&buf, &buf, &schedule, 0);=09 =09 // Decrypting DES_ecb_encrypt(&buf, &buf, &schedule, 1);=09 printf("Text Is: %s\n", buf); =09 return(0); } From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 22 17:45:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D0AE106567A for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 17:45:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F2B98FC13 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 17:45:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-37-207.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.37.207]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77A6B3D910 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 18:45:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id oBMHjZc4001486 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 18:45:35 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 18:45:35 +0100 From: Polytropon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-Id: <20101222184535.d44a73e9.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <201012221554.oBMFs2ub015968@mail.r-bonomi.com> References: <201012221554.oBMFs2ub015968@mail.r-bonomi.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: Well, I broke it! FreeBSD V8.1 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 17:45:38 -0000 On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 09:54:02 -0600 (CST), Robert Bonomi wrote: > > From: "Dave" > > Also. What's the "Correct" way to disable a console screensaver? > > # vidcontrol -t off > > see 'man splash' Also see /etc/defaults/rc.conf which states: blanktime="300" # blank time (in seconds) or "NO" to turn it off. saver="NO" # screen saver: Uses /boot/kernel/${saver}_saver.ko -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 22 18:08:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8DBF1065674 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 18:08:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 843DE8FC0C for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 18:08:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-37-207.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.37.207]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C77C780B7; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 19:08:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id oBMI8G1T001576; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 19:08:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 19:08:16 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Chris Brennan Message-Id: <20101222190816.e6932925.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <4D11DA76.32672.214EF771@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> <20101222130711.00006546@unknown> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Well, I broke it! FreeBSD V8.1 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 18:08:20 -0000 On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 09:49:46 -0500, Chris Brennan wrote: > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Bruce Cran wrote: > > > On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:01:10 -0000 > > "Dave" wrote: > > > > > Sysinstall alows you to select and enable one, but not remove it! > > > > > > Bit of an oversight that I suspect.... > > > > Fixed in r216651 :) > > > > > IIRC ';' isn't a valid bash comment ... (which has been previously discussed > elsewhere). It's usually safer to use '#' for comment in /etc/rc.conf and > other system config files as they typically use BASH style structs. Putting emphasize on _BA_sh seems to be a typical Linuxism. :-) FreeBSD's standard scripting shell is the Bourne Shell, /bin/sh. The Bourne Again Shell, bash, isn't even part of the FreeBSD (base) system. Only under exceptional circumstances there will be a /bin/bash. As it has been pointed out, /etc/rc.conf is a shell script (or to be correct: part of a shell script) that basically consists of variable assignments, name="value". In this context, ; has the default meaning in sh syntax - this refers to Bourne Shell syntax. The ; means "command separator". It is a valid syntactical element of the "sh language". A command like ; saver="NO" causes the shell to stop processing the script (which causes the system boot to stop as it interrupts reading /etc/rc.conf, which interrupts the start of /etc/rc). Infont of ; there has to be a command, and in this case, nothing is there. As the Bourne Shell is the standard scripting shell on most UNIX systems, relying on bash specific constructs may have impact to script portability (which may develop into an issue if you have to create scripts that should run on many different kinds of UNIX). The form : << DELIMITER ... pile ... ... of ... ... text ... DELIMITER is indirectly refered to in "man sh": The following redirection is often called a ``here-document''. [n]<< delimiter here-doc-text ... delimiter All the text on successive lines up to the delimiter is saved away and made available to the command on standard input, or file descriptor n if it is specified. If the delimiter as specified on the initial line is quoted, then the here-doc-text is treated literally, otherwise the text is subjected to parameter expansion, command substitution, and arithmetic expansion (as described in the section on Word Expansions). If the oper- ator is ``<<-'' instead of ``<<'', then leading tabs in the here-doc-text are stripped. // The option of specifying : as a file descriptor works with the standard /bin/sh of FreeBSD, but I'm not sure this should be encouraged for use in configuration files like /etc/rc.conf. Using the form # blah is also better for use with syntax highlighting as comments can be determined more easily, whereas the form using the "here-doc" is primarily a "here-doc" and NOT a comment (unless directed toward :). >From "man sh": The character `#' introduces a comment if used at the beginning of a word. The word starting with `#' and the rest of the line are ignored. // The use of # also makes sure there is NO kind of variable expansion or arithmetic operation done - which you could achieve using : << 'DELIMITER' ... pile ... ... of ... ... text ... $((the)) $USER `/bin/laden` ${causes `NO' touble here! 'DELIMITER' but # is the really safe form, as you can write ANYTHING behind it. Again, the form illustrated above could cause some interpretation problems for syntax highlighting algorithms. See "man rc.conf" for details. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 22 20:49:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FE27106564A for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 20:49:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhelfman@experts-exchange.com) Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (mail.experts-exchange.com [72.29.183.251]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29E798FC1B for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 20:49:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.experts-exchange.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2D5C9C9079; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:49:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=e-e.com; h= user-agent:in-reply-to:content-disposition:content-type :content-type:mime-version:references:message-id:subject:subject :from:from:date:date:received:received:received; s=ee; t= 1293050942; x=1294865342; bh=ZSEXInsU+eaPKKV1CxoluAE656WN3YmR5sG A02ZCaHE=; b=bxqEz33Ngw2MD6MCucrqGVfoRDeczmBuLe5BX7qpYd5vMRLfKZ3 YcJw7aCnRCtpfKQq0EnXxF+AW1/T+y625ziji6soQGU6qenJ8vwWMqBJAjT7N5jH EHmKU4vaFIzRcDCI2647Ecy9GSUMjbjSvdVnhuBbpsqbXskk1Igyh9vw= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at experts-exchange.com Received: from mail.experts-exchange.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.experts-exchange.com (mail.experts-exchange.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id PCZnWVilXvWo; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:49:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from experts-exchange.com (unknown [192.168.103.122]) by mail.experts-exchange.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 41FD79C9074; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:49:02 -0800 (PST) Received: (nullmailer pid 21998 invoked by uid 1001); Wed, 22 Dec 2010 20:45:59 -0000 Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:45:59 -0800 From: Jason Helfman To: Chris Brennan Message-ID: <20101222204558.GI92495@eggman.experts-exchange.com> References: <4D11DA76.32672.214EF771@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> <20101222130711.00006546@unknown> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE X-Living-The-Dream: I love the SLO Life! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: Bruce Cran , Dave , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Well, I broke it! FreeBSD V8.1 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 20:49:03 -0000 On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 09:49:46AM -0500, Chris Brennan thus spake: >On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Bruce Cran wrote: > >> On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:01:10 -0000 >> "Dave" wrote: >> >> > Sysinstall alows you to select and enable one, but not remove it! >> > >> > Bit of an oversight that I suspect.... >> >> Fixed in r216651 :) >> > > >IIRC ';' isn't a valid bash comment ... (which has been previously discussed >elsewhere). It's usually safer to use '#' for comment in /etc/rc.conf and >other system config files as they typically use BASH style structs. IMHO... It seems that /etc/rc.conf is in need of a sytax check script. Something similiar to visudo for editing /usr/local/etc/sudoers. -jgh From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 22 21:00:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B024B1065674 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:00:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from omerfsen@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yx0-f182.google.com (mail-yx0-f182.google.com [209.85.213.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FCF38FC1B for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:00:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxh35 with SMTP id 35so2609071yxh.13 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:00:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=jx5KRr0NQ23hkOqNjRkGy3FO1vxkoZt4Tj0cmtIMIwM=; b=KEwb8EDe0C116cmXEfqA1v6nEKbvfpPbkH5GwQZOoZ4DosDWAlSpz4gfgQ+r/gx5Yo +duZS5O35+TeyJ0c3gGACZmVgHyEmixI1zs1nySD74ZF/MM2re+OUuUkLMiFSlUdbTsU frr8Jqke91BPNyfnyPRFXGxswM7pve6W+oRBg= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=wk8YLJVGblpa587AMkRa7+WHG3gS+HKOMWDO+Q6X+/HamnVqhvwOsvlIALRA6jHJys G7ujj1xjECe3skQktMqwCs2s+PZj7G57gp7u19OwlrihOdGWWjXOUiOBDZfLOF+UKR2s 3TNlmiI/1/NDWFi57Jkjw0D0e7JDteZnt+yuY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.100.189.17 with SMTP id m17mr4496681anf.19.1293050334350; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:38:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.147.172.1 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:38:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 22:38:54 +0200 Message-ID: From: Omer Faruk SEN To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: 9 TB single device and zfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:00:45 -0000 Hi, Is it suggested to create a zfs on a single 9 TB volume? There is hardware raid and I am thinking to enable write-back cache on that hw based raid card. Regards. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 22 21:04:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56C0C106564A for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:04:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rfarmer@predatorlabs.net) Received: from mail-ww0-f42.google.com (mail-ww0-f42.google.com [74.125.82.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7B418FC1D for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:04:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwi17 with SMTP id 17so5516841wwi.1 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:04:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.183.145 with SMTP id q17mr6374154wem.5.1293051871762; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:04:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.241.11 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:04:31 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [71.1.133.114] In-Reply-To: <20101222204558.GI92495@eggman.experts-exchange.com> References: <4D11DA76.32672.214EF771@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> <20101222130711.00006546@unknown> <20101222204558.GI92495@eggman.experts-exchange.com> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:04:31 -0800 Message-ID: From: Rob Farmer To: Jason Helfman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Bruce Cran , Dave , Chris Brennan , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Well, I broke it! FreeBSD V8.1 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:04:33 -0000 On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 12:45, Jason Helfman wrote: > IMHO... > It seems that /etc/rc.conf is in need of a sytax check script. Something > similiar to visudo for editing /usr/local/etc/sudoers. > Just run it with /bin/sh. If no errors appear the syntax is good. Or you can use /bin/sh -x to see more detail. -- Rob Farmer From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 22 21:09:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BC221065679 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:09:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74F2C8FC26 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:09:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 31116 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2010 21:09:04 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 22 Dec 2010 21:09:04 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 9B1F95082F; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 16:08:54 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4D11DA76.32672.214EF771@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> <20101222130711.00006546@unknown> <20101222204558.GI92495@eggman.experts-exchange.com> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 16:08:54 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20101222204558.GI92495@eggman.experts-exchange.com> (Jason Helfman's message of "Wed, 22 Dec 2010 12:45:59 -0800") Message-ID: <44sjxpikgp.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: Well, I broke it! FreeBSD V8.1 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:09:05 -0000 Jason Helfman writes: > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 09:49:46AM -0500, Chris Brennan thus spake: >>On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Bruce Cran wrote: >> >>> On Wed, 22 Dec 2010 11:01:10 -0000 >>> "Dave" wrote: >>> >>> > Sysinstall alows you to select and enable one, but not remove it! >>> > >>> > Bit of an oversight that I suspect.... >>> >>> Fixed in r216651 :) >>> >> >> >>IIRC ';' isn't a valid bash comment ... (which has been previously discussed >>elsewhere). It's usually safer to use '#' for comment in /etc/rc.conf and >>other system config files as they typically use BASH style structs. > > IMHO... > It seems that /etc/rc.conf is in need of a sytax check script. Something > similiar to visudo for editing /usr/local/etc/sudoers. Well, rc.conf isn't supposed to have anything but variable settings, so for syntax alone, "/bin/sh /etc/rc.conf" is a perfectly fine test. If you want to check semantics as well, things get complicated very quickly. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 22 21:17:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F829106564A for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:17:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f49.google.com (mail-fx0-f49.google.com [209.85.161.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E495B8FC18 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:17:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm19 with SMTP id 19so5397303fxm.36 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:17:50 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=WCjANHwmbo8lzS7LMiF4SINJ9q/ZCubemY91k+PlBc4=; b=jkobScNjP0FEn8yQwoikLyGzAKYDUVPrCTr4SCJrzAI0YfQY6z2eRG6vDurFgs0fqu 4jbZxtZ7s0gv4wuV23DggoBQFAqFjJDznMLSsnTDGkOjZ78Z3+EtyAOjfLEcNJP7+8RU Tz+fbAPK326wBKXqedlbWiLDU/c3OsgB0s7aI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=paFbvWkdt0T+DxQ42jpj6sPK1FQuu+dpBuLKtXKzA7qghpzJTz6R0rEgaPOk9HJUmU 9MfjX4zKFoIPDwvidacQBHTTUav6nAcICpm5ybEXabVuo9K589U2GrTiLbKUxyu/cLu2 Rta/Uu92NAcT6aaDObRLE39R/Muk1poz7AHvk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.85.203 with SMTP id p11mr46130fal.108.1293052669123; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:17:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.114.4 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:17:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 15:17:49 -0600 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Omer Faruk SEN Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: FreeBSD Subject: Re: 9 TB single device and zfs X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:17:52 -0000 On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 2:38 PM, Omer Faruk SEN wrote: > Is it suggested to create a zfs on a single 9 TB volume? Depends on your need. You really haven't provided enough info to give advice ie how many disks do you have, what storage capacity do you need, performance etc. ZFS capability are better utilized when ZFS, and not the storage controller is providing the raid/mirroring functionality, but this has some drawbacks as well. > There is > hardware raid and I am thinking to enable write-back cache on that hw > based raid card. > Raid-z/mirror stripes have some advantages over hw raid so you may wish to grow your understanding of the differences before proceeding. You should also ensure your hardware correctly handles cache flush requests as a few disks and some SSD's don't. If the hardware makes false reports to ZFS, you can experience different forms of pool corruption in a loss of power situation. You'll almost certainly want a BBU if you're going to go this route. http://www.solarisinternals.com/wiki/index.php/ZFS_Evil_Tuning_Guide -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 22 21:20:55 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D49781065672 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:20:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f49.google.com (mail-fx0-f49.google.com [209.85.161.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 613388FC19 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:20:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm19 with SMTP id 19so5399778fxm.36 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:20:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=k2/yUQgQRUbAfQupXiC9i5D3gDVgs/Wn+iZWoEYvTXs=; b=r0gxBWhSsnGjnA5d2mf3xa4Dg40eSI6veF0wp2x0T5RWIcb3SzFuntLFgFE+3QIf+b hypf3hai2ji0Yu3eT2NKll6ZRvFIar2u7Q++2oEoFOc1kgGu3ASuSaQfzMVYsXI2q1Ol /QVYhWSJb6lzTk4G8wtXHggdfwBEbBXjZ4DE0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=QhcjQKEVlX3TBU+Jew9UyoGrieie/BIJaFZjeITlM+f4Va/6+Wd5+p8qWvFzOrsKy1 P85OQ6t9BGH1k0I1laPe50uMOmdKVV/HTJNPmVmG3gIOB1wz0XGywu6+5mGjF4yHhGaS ezwt2Wg3EOBTvO/09JN8optZJPPwXTP0jiE5w= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.85.203 with SMTP id p11mr49486fal.108.1293052854043; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:20:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.114.4 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:20:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <44sjxpikgp.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <4D11DA76.32672.214EF771@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> <20101222130711.00006546@unknown> <20101222204558.GI92495@eggman.experts-exchange.com> <44sjxpikgp.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 15:20:53 -0600 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Lowell Gilbert Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Well, I broke it! FreeBSD V8.1 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:20:56 -0000 On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Lowell Gilbert < freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> wrote: > Well, rc.conf isn't supposed to have anything but variable settings, so > for syntax alone, "/bin/sh /etc/rc.conf" is a perfectly fine test. If > you want to check semantics as well, things get complicated very quickly. > rcorder(8) is a good starting point for basic semantic checking. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 22 21:28:34 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F3921065672 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:28:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mkearney@nvita.org) Received: from squirrelserver.nvita.org (nvita.org [173.10.132.234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA4358FC0C for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:28:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from SQUIRRELSERVER.nvita.org ([192.168.0.3]) by SQUIRRELSERVER.nvita.org ([192.168.0.3]) with mapi; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 16:37:05 -0500 From: "Michael J. Kearney" To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 16:37:04 -0500 Thread-Topic: do i need a dedicated ip address for https? Thread-Index: Acuh1kf8s2j7bUURQwm22yPNmBiXEgASByte Message-ID: <0A2D7DF01CEBB144ACA1A79F588BD239038C4E7CBD8E@SQUIRRELSERVER.nvita.org> References: <353856.29096.qm@web121401.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>, In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: RE: do i need a dedicated ip address for https? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:28:34 -0000 No, I've done that before I could get what's called a pointer record or re= verse DNS for my mail server ... Register a domain and setup the DNS server= . If the ip is dynamic you have to regularly update your DNS server. The f= orward zones will work. If you use openssl to generate your own ssl certif= icates ... (./configure --enable-so --enable-ssl) They wont be recognized b= y the certificate authority. eg: https://mail.nvita.org try it. # General setup for the virtual host DocumentRoot "/usr/local/apache2/htdocs" ServerName mail.nvita.org:443 ServerAdmin mkearney@nvita.org UseCanonicalName On ProxyVia Off ProxyPreserveHost On ProxyPass /owa ! ProxyPass / http://192.168.0.3:99/owa/ ProxyPassReverse / http://mail.nvita.org:99/owa/ ErrorLog "/usr/local/apache2/logs/error_log" TransferLog "/usr/local/apache2/logs/access_log" _______________________ From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org [owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.= org] On Behalf Of c0re [nr1c0re@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, December 22, 2010 7:37 AM To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: do i need a dedicated ip address for https? 2010/12/22 S Mathias : > http://help.godaddy.com/article/1054 > > "# Set up SSL protection on your website." > > is it an inescapable requirement to have a dedicated [not fix] ip address= , when i want to use ssl on my domain? > > thank you > > happy Christmas! :) > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > mod_gnutls can do 'Server Name Indication' and mod_ssl with apache_2.2 should do it too https://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D34607 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=3Drevision&revision=3D776281 But hoster may not use mod_gnutls or not recent version of apache, so it may not support multiple ssl with single IP. _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 22 22:14:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A04C31065695 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 22:14:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@insightbb.com) Received: from mxsf10.insightbb.com (mxsf10.insightbb.com [74.128.0.92]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C1378FC0C for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 22:14:06 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,215,1291611600"; d="scan'208";a="287237239" Received: from unknown (HELO asav01.insightbb.com) ([172.31.249.123]) by mxsf10.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 22 Dec 2010 17:14:05 -0500 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AicuALoGEk1KgCiCPGdsb2JhbACkJAwBAQEBNS/DcYVJBIRmhSo X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.60,215,1291611600"; d="scan'208";a="320468817" Received: from 74-128-40-130.dhcp.insightbb.com (HELO laptop2.stevenfriedrich.org) ([74.128.40.130]) by asavout01.insightbb.com with ESMTP; 22 Dec 2010 17:14:05 -0500 From: Steven Friedrich To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Jack Raats Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 17:14:01 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.1-RELEASE-p2; KDE/4.5.4; i386; ; ) References: <8D95166BBED547ED9FA402C05ED53B7E@jarasc430> In-Reply-To: <8D95166BBED547ED9FA402C05ED53B7E@jarasc430> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201012221714.02998.FreeBSD@insightbb.com> Cc: Subject: Re: Strange error X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 22:14:06 -0000 On Sunday 19 December 2010 12:57:39 pm Jack Raats wrote: > I have a strange error. > > Normally when you compile the complete system, the first line of /etc/motd > is being adjusted telling you the time and version you just compiled. On > one server this is not being done. > What is the problem. Which programm adjust the motd file when compiling? > > Thanks > > Jack > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" If anyone else responded, I may have deleted it while scanning mail too quickly. 8o) motd isn't updated during compile. It's updated during boot. If you don't reboot the machine, it doesn't get updated. There is also a line you can include in rc.conf to disable the update. Search for motd in /etc/defaults/rc.conf for motd. -- System Name: laptop2.StevenFriedrich.org Hardware: 2.80GHz Intel Pentium 4 (HTT) with 2 GB memory OS version: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p2 i386 (5.1 MB kernel) Window Manager(s): kde4-4.5.4 X Window System: xorg-7.5 X.Org X Server 1.7.5 FreeBSD Audio Driver (newpcm: 32bit 2009061500/i386) Installed devices: pcm0: (play/rec) default From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 22 22:15:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 708101065672 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 22:15:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from relay.ptn-ipout02.plus.net (relay.ptn-ipout02.plus.net [212.159.7.36]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F7458FC21 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 22:15:49 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlMFAO7/EU1UXebj/2dsb2JhbACWCI4Zc8NMhUkE Received: from outmx01.plus.net ([84.93.230.227]) by relay.ptn-ipout02.plus.net with ESMTP; 22 Dec 2010 21:46:19 +0000 Received: from helix.plus.com ([84.92.153.232] helo=curlew.milibyte.co.uk) by outmx01.plus.net with esmtp (Exim) id 1PVWVn-0001NR-97 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:46:19 +0000 Received: by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PVWVm-0000h2-2C for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:46:18 +0000 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:46:17 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <201012222146.17757.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Subject: Which network driver for RTL8211 or 8201 NIC's? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 22:15:50 -0000 I need to replace a failing motherboard. I'm aiming to keep the existing Athlon CPU so I'm tied down to to a socket AM2(+) board and the majority of those available seem to have nForce 630a chipsets and RTL8211CL or 8201EL NIC's which aren't explicitly mentioned in the release notes . I see that the strings RTL8211C(L) and RTL8201L (but not EL) appear in /usr/src/sys/dev/rgephy.c and rlphy.c but the man page for the rl driver only mentions RealTek 8129/8139 and I'm not sure which driver is built from rgephy.c. Am I going to have problems if I get a motherboard with one of these NIC's? -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 22 22:28:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 516861065672 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 22:28:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from neshort@yahoo.com) Received: from nm23-vm0.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com (nm23-vm0.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com [98.139.53.220]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A2BC38FC13 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 22:28:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.139.52.189] by nm23.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Dec 2010 22:15:19 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.183] by tm2.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Dec 2010 22:15:19 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1066.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Dec 2010 22:15:19 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 452058.55791.bm@omp1066.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 14509 invoked by uid 60001); 22 Dec 2010 22:15:19 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1293056119; bh=3H1gODbS6ZWp69tDX2KlGaybPo+dWe9G56BpNul3meE=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=1MCAFqhqj1KV6jWM7GID9e8m3xGrrUq0a14/awxBLyJpKdxAnDWGUJiGhaq44Jf+xtr7Ef4Fw1mUhG46o4TYiVlCIhVoKazy9pTLw2Lzc9PDEFHHecMl7bimEP9+960C0AETxlp6zQ/rFzuALZ3ZD8jcFKkhYQ5+AlC5IzP+Mdw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=2/eJ4+3caZyi1h7xdYnfo4RtfW84+1sHiSkqa0me7rs1Z0XxltooTG8g1v4qJatQijGD5JbEx2d8v77zztpVdyDiDmWwtlPWHjKiTs1kiUfpC+UjM5nhnbiFxlz59tpsnZnzHd2EhQIGQPozF/9D86zzUcZ4FQgqsS7Tp/wMIN0=; Message-ID: <194328.14057.qm@web56504.mail.re3.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: DunYbNUVM1l4VwF13phP4K.GVVnIM.EVe2I2arvkclCwyGr BfzTJYJzwr17IMwVuGt9EPFWO4vilpZ6lm_6SEg8nyAT3D.rAiUx6bZNgG.U yxGpZGVYPpzZm7qJT5_o4taBvDcMNR5wkU1UObgF1S27Ok0A1CfMr0RUpKUy lLCuwMZRQbk__YZi8UbLwJfiv.eB7LRVg1bvV6fDUoZ7kZicOtZCSl3IE7sD ONybAtD1cMurNgp1XL8tUn74oQKXQmw47MhxOuRa92BsnrJJo8GbDtCx_fu2 fqRviZqHVaWkSJQQoD.WEew67pB4XP9_eHF57rlDCjHwk6OPUBjsLPBr9.UK 84_JO18GduZoPoq_B7Q4TRTvGcjgthOQbmV03A6oh0LoVBVxo3tPg19rqG5K bczK8P6PsoM4- Received: from [97.115.230.88] by web56504.mail.re3.yahoo.com via HTTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:15:19 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/11.4.20 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 14:15:19 -0800 (PST) From: Neil Short To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="0-1728221267-1293056119=:14057" Subject: what's wrong? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 22:28:06 -0000 --0-1728221267-1293056119=:14057 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Hopefully this will work. I attached a text file of my dmesg. After boot, I start getting ACPI errors. Here's an excerpt. .... Root mount waiting for: usbus1 ugen1.3: at usbus1 Trying to mount root from ufs:/dev/ad4s1a wlan0: Ethernet address: c4:17:fe:24:04:eb wlan0: link state changed to UP ACPI Error: No object attached to node 0xffffff000168a840 (20100331/exresnte-211) ACPI Error (uteval-0318): Method execution failed [\\_SB_.BAT0._UID] (Node 0xffffff000168a840), AE_AML_NO_OPERAND ACPI Error: No object attached to node 0xffffff000168a840 (20100331/exresnte-211) ACPI Error (uteval-0318): Method execution failed [\\_SB_.BAT0._UID] (Node 0xffffff000168a840), AE_AML_NO_OPERAND\ .... ====== "What did you do?" the man holding the flashlight asked. "I put down a spider," he said, wondering why the man didn't see; in the beam of yellow light the spider bloated up larger than life. "So it could get away." --0-1728221267-1293056119=:14057 Content-Type: text/plain; name="dmesg.txt" Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="dmesg.txt" Q29weXJpZ2h0IChjKSAxOTkyLTIwMTAgVGhlIEZyZWVCU0QgUHJvamVjdC4K Q29weXJpZ2h0IChjKSAxOTc5LCAxOTgwLCAxOTgzLCAxOTg2LCAxOTg4LCAx OTg5LCAxOTkxLCAxOTkyLCAxOTkzLCAxOTk0CglUaGUgUmVnZW50cyBvZiB0 aGUgVW5pdmVyc2l0eSBvZiBDYWxpZm9ybmlhLiBBbGwgcmlnaHRzIHJlc2Vy dmVkLgpGcmVlQlNEIGlzIGEgcmVnaXN0ZXJlZCB0cmFkZW1hcmsgb2YgVGhl IEZyZWVCU0QgRm91bmRhdGlvbi4KRnJlZUJTRCA4LjEtU1RBQkxFICMyOiBX ZWQgT2N0IDEzIDIwOjQ4OjI0IE1TVCAyMDEwCiAgICBuZXNob3J0QGNhcm1l bjovdXNyL29iai91c3Ivc3JjL3N5cy9DQVJNRU4gYW1kNjQKVGltZWNvdW50 ZXIgImk4MjU0IiBmcmVxdWVuY3kgMTE5MzE4MiBIeiBxdWFsaXR5IDAKQ1BV OiBJbnRlbChSKSBDb3JlKFRNKSBpMyBDUFUgICAgICAgTSAzMzAgIEAgMi4x M0dIeiAoMjEyNy45Mi1NSHogSzgtY2xhc3MgQ1BVKQogIE9yaWdpbiA9ICJH ZW51aW5lSW50ZWwiICBJZCA9IDB4MjA2NTIgIEZhbWlseSA9IDYgIE1vZGVs ID0gMjUgIFN0ZXBwaW5nID0gMgogIEZlYXR1cmVzPTB4YmZlYmZiZmY8RlBV LFZNRSxERSxQU0UsVFNDLE1TUixQQUUsTUNFLENYOCxBUElDLFNFUCxNVFJS LFBHRSxNQ0EsQ01PVixQQVQsUFNFMzYsQ0xGTFVTSCxEVFMsQUNQSSxNTVgs RlhTUixTU0UsU1NFMixTUyxIVFQsVE0sUEJFPgogIEZlYXR1cmVzMj0weDk4 ZTNiZDxTU0UzLERURVM2NCxNT04sRFNfQ1BMLFZNWCxFU1QsVE0yLFNTU0Uz LENYMTYseFRQUixQRENNLFNTRTQuMSxTU0U0LjIsUE9QQ05UPgogIEFNRCBG ZWF0dXJlcz0weDI4MDAwODAwPFNZU0NBTEwsUkRUU0NQLExNPgogIEFNRCBG ZWF0dXJlczI9MHgxPExBSEY+CiAgVFNDOiBQLXN0YXRlIGludmFyaWFudApy ZWFsIG1lbW9yeSAgPSA0Mjk0OTY3Mjk2ICg0MDk2IE1CKQphdmFpbCBtZW1v cnkgPSAzODkyNjYyMjcyICgzNzEyIE1CKQpBQ1BJIEFQSUMgVGFibGU6IDxI UFFPRU0gU0xJQy1NUEM+CkZyZWVCU0QvU01QOiBNdWx0aXByb2Nlc3NvciBT eXN0ZW0gRGV0ZWN0ZWQ6IDQgQ1BVcwpGcmVlQlNEL1NNUDogMSBwYWNrYWdl KHMpIHggMiBjb3JlKHMpIHggMiBTTVQgdGhyZWFkcwogY3B1MCAoQlNQKTog QVBJQyBJRDogIDAKIGNwdTEgKEFQKTogQVBJQyBJRDogIDEKIGNwdTIgKEFQ KTogQVBJQyBJRDogIDQKIGNwdTMgKEFQKTogQVBJQyBJRDogIDUKaW9hcGlj MDogQ2hhbmdpbmcgQVBJQyBJRCB0byAyCmlvYXBpYzAgPFZlcnNpb24gMi4w PiBpcnFzIDAtMjMgb24gbW90aGVyYm9hcmQKa2JkMSBhdCBrYmRtdXgwCmFj cGkwOiA8SFBRT0VNIFNMSUMtTVBDPiBvbiBtb3RoZXJib2FyZAphY3BpMDog W0lUSFJFQURdCmFjcGkwOiBQb3dlciBCdXR0b24gKGZpeGVkKQphY3BpX2hw ZXQwOiA8SGlnaCBQcmVjaXNpb24gRXZlbnQgVGltZXI+IGlvbWVtIDB4ZmVk MDAwMDAtMHhmZWQwMDNmZiBvbiBhY3BpMApUaW1lY291bnRlciAiSFBFVCIg ZnJlcXVlbmN5IDE0MzE4MTgwIEh6IHF1YWxpdHkgOTAwClRpbWVjb3VudGVy ICJBQ1BJLXNhZmUiIGZyZXF1ZW5jeSAzNTc5NTQ1IEh6IHF1YWxpdHkgODUw CmFjcGlfdGltZXIwOiA8MjQtYml0IHRpbWVyIGF0IDMuNTc5NTQ1TUh6PiBw b3J0IDB4NDA4LTB4NDBiIG9uIGFjcGkwCmNwdTA6IDxBQ1BJIENQVT4gb24g YWNwaTAKY3B1MTogPEFDUEkgQ1BVPiBvbiBhY3BpMApjcHUyOiA8QUNQSSBD UFU+IG9uIGFjcGkwCmNwdTM6IDxBQ1BJIENQVT4gb24gYWNwaTAKYWNwaV9l YzA6IDxFbWJlZGRlZCBDb250cm9sbGVyOiBHUEUgMHgxNz4gcG9ydCAweDYy LDB4NjYgb24gYWNwaTAKYWNwaV9idXR0b24wOiA8UG93ZXIgQnV0dG9uPiBv biBhY3BpMAphY3BpX2xpZDA6IDxDb250cm9sIE1ldGhvZCBMaWQgU3dpdGNo PiBvbiBhY3BpMAphY3BpX2J1dHRvbjE6IDxTbGVlcCBCdXR0b24+IG9uIGFj cGkwCmJhdHRlcnkwOiA8QUNQSSBDb250cm9sIE1ldGhvZCBCYXR0ZXJ5PiBv biBhY3BpMAphY3BpX2FjYWQwOiA8QUMgQWRhcHRlcj4gb24gYWNwaTAKcGNp YjA6IDxBQ1BJIEhvc3QtUENJIGJyaWRnZT4gcG9ydCAweGNmOC0weGNmZiBv biBhY3BpMApwY2kwOiA8QUNQSSBQQ0kgYnVzPiBvbiBwY2liMAp2Z2FwY2kw OiA8VkdBLWNvbXBhdGlibGUgZGlzcGxheT4gcG9ydCAweDYwNTAtMHg2MDU3 IG1lbSAweGQwMDAwMDAwLTB4ZDAzZmZmZmYsMHhjMDAwMDAwMC0weGNmZmZm ZmZmIGlycSAxNiBhdCBkZXZpY2UgMi4wIG9uIHBjaTAKYWdwMDogPEludGVs IElyb25sYWtlIChNKSBTVkdBIGNvbnRyb2xsZXI+IG9uIHZnYXBjaTAKYWdw MDogZGV0ZWN0ZWQgMzI3NjRrIHN0b2xlbiBtZW1vcnkKYWdwMDogYXBlcnR1 cmUgc2l6ZSBpcyAyNTZNCnBjaTA6IDxzaW1wbGUgY29tbXM+IGF0IGRldmlj ZSAyMi4wIChubyBkcml2ZXIgYXR0YWNoZWQpCmVoY2kwOiA8SW50ZWwgUENI IFVTQiAyLjAgY29udHJvbGxlciBVU0ItQj4gbWVtIDB4ZDg0MDVjMDAtMHhk ODQwNWZmZiBpcnEgMTYgYXQgZGV2aWNlIDI2LjAgb24gcGNpMAplaGNpMDog W0lUSFJFQURdCnVzYnVzMDogRUhDSSB2ZXJzaW9uIDEuMAp1c2J1czA6IDxJ bnRlbCBQQ0ggVVNCIDIuMCBjb250cm9sbGVyIFVTQi1CPiBvbiBlaGNpMApo ZGFjMDogPEludGVsIFBDSCBIaWdoIERlZmluaXRpb24gQXVkaW8gQ29udHJv bGxlcj4gbWVtIDB4ZDg0MDAwMDAtMHhkODQwM2ZmZiBpcnEgMjIgYXQgZGV2 aWNlIDI3LjAgb24gcGNpMApoZGFjMDogSERBIERyaXZlciBSZXZpc2lvbjog MjAxMDAyMjZfMDE0MgpoZGFjMDogW0lUSFJFQURdCnBjaWIxOiA8QUNQSSBQ Q0ktUENJIGJyaWRnZT4gYXQgZGV2aWNlIDI4LjAgb24gcGNpMApwY2kxOiA8 QUNQSSBQQ0kgYnVzPiBvbiBwY2liMQpwY2liMjogPEFDUEkgUENJLVBDSSBi cmlkZ2U+IGF0IGRldmljZSAyOC4xIG9uIHBjaTAKcGNpMjogPEFDUEkgUENJ IGJ1cz4gb24gcGNpYjIKYXRoMDogPEF0aGVyb3MgOTI4NT4gbWVtIDB4ZDY0 MDAwMDAtMHhkNjQwZmZmZiBpcnEgMTcgYXQgZGV2aWNlIDAuMCBvbiBwY2ky CmF0aDA6IFtJVEhSRUFEXQphdGgwOiBBUjkyODUgbWFjIDE5Mi4yIFJGNTEz MyBwaHkgMTQuMApwY2liMzogPEFDUEkgUENJLVBDSSBicmlkZ2U+IGF0IGRl dmljZSAyOC4yIG9uIHBjaTAKcGNpMzogPEFDUEkgUENJIGJ1cz4gb24gcGNp YjMKcmUwOiA8UmVhbFRlayA4MTAxRS84MTAyRS84MTAyRUwvODEwM0UgUENJ ZSAxMC8xMDBiYXNlVFg+IHBvcnQgMHgzMDAwLTB4MzBmZiBtZW0gMHhkMjQw NDAwMC0weGQyNDA0ZmZmLDB4ZDI0MDAwMDAtMHhkMjQwM2ZmZiBpcnEgMTgg YXQgZGV2aWNlIDAuMCBvbiBwY2kzCnJlMDogVXNpbmcgMSBNU0kgbWVzc2Fn ZXMKcmUwOiBDaGlwIHJldi4gMHgyNDAwMDAwMApyZTA6IE1BQyByZXYuIDB4 MDAwMDAwMDAKcmUwOiBVbmtub3duIEgvVyByZXZpc2lvbjogMHgyNDAwMDAw MApkZXZpY2VfYXR0YWNoOiByZTAgYXR0YWNoIHJldHVybmVkIDYKcGNpMzog PHVua25vd24+IGF0IGRldmljZSAwLjEgKG5vIGRyaXZlciBhdHRhY2hlZCkK cGNpMzogPGJhc2UgcGVyaXBoZXJhbCwgU0QgaG9zdCBjb250cm9sbGVyPiBh dCBkZXZpY2UgMC4yIChubyBkcml2ZXIgYXR0YWNoZWQpCnBjaWI0OiA8QUNQ SSBQQ0ktUENJIGJyaWRnZT4gYXQgZGV2aWNlIDI4LjMgb24gcGNpMApwY2k0 OiA8QUNQSSBQQ0kgYnVzPiBvbiBwY2liNAplaGNpMTogPEludGVsIFBDSCBV U0IgMi4wIGNvbnRyb2xsZXIgVVNCLUE+IG1lbSAweGQ4NDA1ODAwLTB4ZDg0 MDViZmYgaXJxIDIwIGF0IGRldmljZSAyOS4wIG9uIHBjaTAKZWhjaTE6IFtJ VEhSRUFEXQp1c2J1czE6IEVIQ0kgdmVyc2lvbiAxLjAKdXNidXMxOiA8SW50 ZWwgUENIIFVTQiAyLjAgY29udHJvbGxlciBVU0ItQT4gb24gZWhjaTEKcGNp YjU6IDxBQ1BJIFBDSS1QQ0kgYnJpZGdlPiBhdCBkZXZpY2UgMzAuMCBvbiBw Y2kwCnBjaTc6IDxBQ1BJIFBDSSBidXM+IG9uIHBjaWI1CmlzYWIwOiA8UENJ LUlTQSBicmlkZ2U+IGF0IGRldmljZSAzMS4wIG9uIHBjaTAKaXNhMDogPElT QSBidXM+IG9uIGlzYWIwCmF0YXBjaTA6IDxJbnRlbCA1IFNlcmllcy8zNDAw IFNlcmllcyBQQ0ggU0FUQTMwMCBjb250cm9sbGVyPiBwb3J0IDB4NjA0OC0w eDYwNGYsMHg2MDVjLTB4NjA1ZiwweDYwNDAtMHg2MDQ3LDB4NjA1OC0weDYw NWIsMHg2MDIwLTB4NjAzZiBtZW0gMHhkODQwNTAwMC0weGQ4NDA1N2ZmIGly cSAyMSBhdCBkZXZpY2UgMzEuMiBvbiBwY2kwCmF0YXBjaTA6IFtJVEhSRUFE XQphdGFwY2kwOiBBSENJIGNhbGxlZCBmcm9tIHZlbmRvciBzcGVjaWZpYyBk cml2ZXIKYXRhcGNpMDogQUhDSSB2MS4zMCBjb250cm9sbGVyIHdpdGggNCAz R2JwcyBwb3J0cywgUE0gbm90IHN1cHBvcnRlZAphdGEyOiA8QVRBIGNoYW5u ZWwgMD4gb24gYXRhcGNpMAphdGEyOiBbSVRIUkVBRF0KYXRhMzogPEFUQSBj aGFubmVsIDQ+IG9uIGF0YXBjaTAKYXRhMzogW0lUSFJFQURdCmF0YTQ6IDxB VEEgY2hhbm5lbCA1PiBvbiBhdGFwY2kwCmF0YTQ6IFtJVEhSRUFEXQpwY2kw OiA8c2VyaWFsIGJ1cywgU01CdXM+IGF0IGRldmljZSAzMS4zIChubyBkcml2 ZXIgYXR0YWNoZWQpCnBjaTA6IDxkYXNwPiBhdCBkZXZpY2UgMzEuNiAobm8g ZHJpdmVyIGF0dGFjaGVkKQpwY2liNjogPEFDUEkgSG9zdC1QQ0kgYnJpZGdl PiBvbiBhY3BpMApwY2kxMjc6IDxBQ1BJIFBDSSBidXM+IG9uIHBjaWI2CmFj cGlfdHowOiA8VGhlcm1hbCBab25lPiBvbiBhY3BpMAphdHJ0YzA6IDxBVCBy ZWFsdGltZSBjbG9jaz4gcG9ydCAweDcwLTB4NzcgaXJxIDggb24gYWNwaTAK YXRydGMwOiBXYXJuaW5nOiBDb3VsZG4ndCBtYXAgSS9PLgphdGtiZGMwOiA8 S2V5Ym9hcmQgY29udHJvbGxlciAoaTgwNDIpPiBwb3J0IDB4NjAsMHg2NCBp cnEgMSBvbiBhY3BpMAphdGtiZDA6IDxBVCBLZXlib2FyZD4gaXJxIDEgb24g YXRrYmRjMAprYmQwIGF0IGF0a2JkMAphdGtiZDA6IFtHSUFOVC1MT0NLRURd CmF0a2JkMDogW0lUSFJFQURdCnBzbTA6IDxQUy8yIE1vdXNlPiBpcnEgMTIg b24gYXRrYmRjMApwc20wOiBbR0lBTlQtTE9DS0VEXQpwc20wOiBbSVRIUkVB RF0KcHNtMDogbW9kZWwgR2xpZGVQb2ludCwgZGV2aWNlIElEIDAKc2MwOiA8 U3lzdGVtIGNvbnNvbGU+IGF0IGZsYWdzIDB4MTAwIG9uIGlzYTAKc2MwOiBW R0EgPDE2IHZpcnR1YWwgY29uc29sZXMsIGZsYWdzPTB4MzAwPgp2Z2EwOiA8 R2VuZXJpYyBJU0EgVkdBPiBhdCBwb3J0IDB4M2MwLTB4M2RmIGlvbWVtIDB4 YTAwMDAtMHhiZmZmZiBvbiBpc2EwCnBwYzA6IGNhbm5vdCByZXNlcnZlIEkv TyBwb3J0IHJhbmdlCmVzdDA6IDxFbmhhbmNlZCBTcGVlZFN0ZXAgRnJlcXVl bmN5IENvbnRyb2w+IG9uIGNwdTAKcDR0Y2MwOiA8Q1BVIEZyZXF1ZW5jeSBU aGVybWFsIENvbnRyb2w+IG9uIGNwdTAKZXN0MTogPEVuaGFuY2VkIFNwZWVk U3RlcCBGcmVxdWVuY3kgQ29udHJvbD4gb24gY3B1MQpwNHRjYzE6IDxDUFUg RnJlcXVlbmN5IFRoZXJtYWwgQ29udHJvbD4gb24gY3B1MQplc3QyOiA8RW5o YW5jZWQgU3BlZWRTdGVwIEZyZXF1ZW5jeSBDb250cm9sPiBvbiBjcHUyCnA0 dGNjMjogPENQVSBGcmVxdWVuY3kgVGhlcm1hbCBDb250cm9sPiBvbiBjcHUy CmVzdDM6IDxFbmhhbmNlZCBTcGVlZFN0ZXAgRnJlcXVlbmN5IENvbnRyb2w+ IG9uIGNwdTMKcDR0Y2MzOiA8Q1BVIEZyZXF1ZW5jeSBUaGVybWFsIENvbnRy b2w+IG9uIGNwdTMKUlRDIEJJT1MgZGlhZ25vc3RpYyBlcnJvciA4MDxjbG9j a19iYXR0ZXJ5PgpUaW1lY291bnRlcnMgdGljayBldmVyeSAxLjAwMCBtc2Vj CnVzYnVzMDogNDgwTWJwcyBIaWdoIFNwZWVkIFVTQiB2Mi4wCnVzYnVzMTog NDgwTWJwcyBIaWdoIFNwZWVkIFVTQiB2Mi4wCmFkNDogMzA1MjQ1TUIgPFRP U0hJQkEgTUszMjU2R1NZIExIMDEzQz4gYXQgYXRhMi1tYXN0ZXIgVURNQTEw MCBTQVRBIDNHYi9zCnVnZW4wLjE6IDxJbnRlbD4gYXQgdXNidXMwCnVodWIw OiA8SW50ZWwgRUhDSSByb290IEhVQiwgY2xhc3MgOS8wLCByZXYgMi4wMC8x LjAwLCBhZGRyIDE+IG9uIHVzYnVzMAp1Z2VuMS4xOiA8SW50ZWw+IGF0IHVz YnVzMQp1aHViMTogPEludGVsIEVIQ0kgcm9vdCBIVUIsIGNsYXNzIDkvMCwg cmV2IDIuMDAvMS4wMCwgYWRkciAxPiBvbiB1c2J1czEKYWNkMDogRFZEUiA8 aHAgRFZEUkFNIEdUMzBML21QMDQ+IGF0IGF0YTQtbWFzdGVyIFVETUExMDAg U0FUQSAxLjVHYi9zCmhkYWMwOiBIREEgQ29kZWMgIzA6IElEVCA5MkhEODFC MVgKaGRhYzA6IEhEQSBDb2RlYyAjMzogSW50ZWwgRzQ1IEhETUkKcGNtMDog PEhEQSBJRFQgOTJIRDgxQjFYIFBDTSAjMCBBbmFsb2c+IGF0IGNhZCAwIG5p ZCAxIG9uIGhkYWMwCnBjbTE6IDxIREEgSURUIDkySEQ4MUIxWCBQQ00gIzEg QW5hbG9nPiBhdCBjYWQgMCBuaWQgMSBvbiBoZGFjMApwY20yOiA8SERBIElE VCA5MkhEODFCMVggUENNICMyIERpZ2l0YWw+IGF0IGNhZCAwIG5pZCAxIG9u IGhkYWMwCnBjbTM6IDxIREEgSW50ZWwgRzQ1IEhETUkgUENNICMwIERpc3Bs YXlQb3J0PiBhdCBjYWQgMyBuaWQgMSBvbiBoZGFjMApTTVA6IEFQIENQVSAj MSBMYXVuY2hlZCEKU01QOiBBUCBDUFUgIzIgTGF1bmNoZWQhClNNUDogQVAg Q1BVICMzIExhdW5jaGVkIQpSb290IG1vdW50IHdhaXRpbmcgZm9yOiB1c2J1 czEgdXNidXMwClJvb3QgbW91bnQgd2FpdGluZyBmb3I6IHVzYnVzMSB1c2J1 czAKdWh1YjA6IDMgcG9ydHMgd2l0aCAzIHJlbW92YWJsZSwgc2VsZiBwb3dl cmVkCnVodWIxOiAzIHBvcnRzIHdpdGggMyByZW1vdmFibGUsIHNlbGYgcG93 ZXJlZApSb290IG1vdW50IHdhaXRpbmcgZm9yOiB1c2J1czEgdXNidXMwCnVn ZW4wLjI6IDx2ZW5kb3IgMHg4MDg3PiBhdCB1c2J1czAKdWh1YjI6IDx2ZW5k b3IgMHg4MDg3IHByb2R1Y3QgMHgwMDIwLCBjbGFzcyA5LzAsIHJldiAyLjAw LzAuMDAsIGFkZHIgMj4gb24gdXNidXMwCnVnZW4xLjI6IDx2ZW5kb3IgMHg4 MDg3PiBhdCB1c2J1czEKdWh1YjM6IDx2ZW5kb3IgMHg4MDg3IHByb2R1Y3Qg MHgwMDIwLCBjbGFzcyA5LzAsIHJldiAyLjAwLzAuMDAsIGFkZHIgMj4gb24g dXNidXMxCnVodWIyOiA2IHBvcnRzIHdpdGggNiByZW1vdmFibGUsIHNlbGYg cG93ZXJlZAp1aHViMzogOCBwb3J0cyB3aXRoIDggcmVtb3ZhYmxlLCBzZWxm IHBvd2VyZWQKUm9vdCBtb3VudCB3YWl0aW5nIGZvcjogdXNidXMxCnVnZW4x LjM6IDx2ZW5kb3IgMHgwOTBjPiBhdCB1c2J1czEKVHJ5aW5nIHRvIG1vdW50 IHJvb3QgZnJvbSB1ZnM6L2Rldi9hZDRzMWEKd2xhbjA6IEV0aGVybmV0IGFk ZHJlc3M6IGM0OjE3OmZlOjI0OjA0OmViCndsYW4wOiBsaW5rIHN0YXRlIGNo YW5nZWQgdG8gVVAKQUNQSSBFcnJvcjogTm8gb2JqZWN0IGF0dGFjaGVkIHRv IG5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwICgyMDEwMDMzMS9leHJlc250ZS0y MTEpCkFDUEkgRXJyb3IgKHV0ZXZhbC0wMzE4KTogTWV0aG9kIGV4ZWN1dGlv biBmYWlsZWQgW1xcX1NCXy5CQVQwLl9VSURdIChOb2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAw MTY4YTg0MCksIEFFX0FNTF9OT19PUEVSQU5ECkFDUEkgRXJyb3I6IE5vIG9i amVjdCBhdHRhY2hlZCB0byBub2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0MCAoMjAx MDAzMzEvZXhyZXNudGUtMjExKQpBQ1BJIEVycm9yICh1dGV2YWwtMDMxOCk6 IE1ldGhvZCBleGVjdXRpb24gZmFpbGVkIFtcXF9TQl8uQkFUMC5fVUlEXSAo Tm9kZSAweGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4NDApLCBBRV9BTUxfTk9fT1BFUkFORApB Q1BJIEVycm9yOiBObyBvYmplY3QgYXR0YWNoZWQgdG8gbm9kZSAweGZmZmZm ZjAwMDE2OGE4NDAgKDIwMTAwMzMxL2V4cmVzbnRlLTIxMSkKQUNQSSBFcnJv ciAodXRldmFsLTAzMTgpOiBNZXRob2QgZXhlY3V0aW9uIGZhaWxlZCBbXFxf U0JfLkJBVDAuX1VJRF0gKE5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwKSwgQUVf QU1MX05PX09QRVJBTkQKQUNQSSBFcnJvcjogTm8gb2JqZWN0IGF0dGFjaGVk IHRvIG5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwICgyMDEwMDMzMS9leHJlc250 ZS0yMTEpCkFDUEkgRXJyb3IgKHV0ZXZhbC0wMzE4KTogTWV0aG9kIGV4ZWN1 dGlvbiBmYWlsZWQgW1xcX1NCXy5CQVQwLl9VSURdIChOb2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZm MDAwMTY4YTg0MCksIEFFX0FNTF9OT19PUEVSQU5ECkFDUEkgRXJyb3I6IE5v IG9iamVjdCBhdHRhY2hlZCB0byBub2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0MCAo MjAxMDAzMzEvZXhyZXNudGUtMjExKQpBQ1BJIEVycm9yICh1dGV2YWwtMDMx OCk6IE1ldGhvZCBleGVjdXRpb24gZmFpbGVkIFtcXF9TQl8uQkFUMC5fVUlE XSAoTm9kZSAweGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4NDApLCBBRV9BTUxfTk9fT1BFUkFO RApBQ1BJIEVycm9yOiBObyBvYmplY3QgYXR0YWNoZWQgdG8gbm9kZSAweGZm ZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4NDAgKDIwMTAwMzMxL2V4cmVzbnRlLTIxMSkKQUNQSSBF cnJvciAodXRldmFsLTAzMTgpOiBNZXRob2QgZXhlY3V0aW9uIGZhaWxlZCBb XFxfU0JfLkJBVDAuX1VJRF0gKE5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwKSwg QUVfQU1MX05PX09QRVJBTkQKQUNQSSBFcnJvcjogTm8gb2JqZWN0IGF0dGFj aGVkIHRvIG5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwICgyMDEwMDMzMS9leHJl c250ZS0yMTEpCkFDUEkgRXJyb3IgKHV0ZXZhbC0wMzE4KTogTWV0aG9kIGV4 ZWN1dGlvbiBmYWlsZWQgW1xcX1NCXy5CQVQwLl9VSURdIChOb2RlIDB4ZmZm ZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0MCksIEFFX0FNTF9OT19PUEVSQU5ECkFDUEkgRXJyb3I6 IE5vIG9iamVjdCBhdHRhY2hlZCB0byBub2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0 MCAoMjAxMDAzMzEvZXhyZXNudGUtMjExKQpBQ1BJIEVycm9yICh1dGV2YWwt MDMxOCk6IE1ldGhvZCBleGVjdXRpb24gZmFpbGVkIFtcXF9TQl8uQkFUMC5f VUlEXSAoTm9kZSAweGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4NDApLCBBRV9BTUxfTk9fT1BF UkFORApBQ1BJIEVycm9yOiBObyBvYmplY3QgYXR0YWNoZWQgdG8gbm9kZSAw eGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4NDAgKDIwMTAwMzMxL2V4cmVzbnRlLTIxMSkKQUNQ SSBFcnJvciAodXRldmFsLTAzMTgpOiBNZXRob2QgZXhlY3V0aW9uIGZhaWxl ZCBbXFxfU0JfLkJBVDAuX1VJRF0gKE5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQw KSwgQUVfQU1MX05PX09QRVJBTkQKQUNQSSBFcnJvcjogTm8gb2JqZWN0IGF0 dGFjaGVkIHRvIG5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwICgyMDEwMDMzMS9l eHJlc250ZS0yMTEpCkFDUEkgRXJyb3IgKHV0ZXZhbC0wMzE4KTogTWV0aG9k IGV4ZWN1dGlvbiBmYWlsZWQgW1xcX1NCXy5CQVQwLl9VSURdIChOb2RlIDB4 ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0MCksIEFFX0FNTF9OT19PUEVSQU5ECkFDUEkgRXJy b3I6IE5vIG9iamVjdCBhdHRhY2hlZCB0byBub2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4 YTg0MCAoMjAxMDAzMzEvZXhyZXNudGUtMjExKQpBQ1BJIEVycm9yICh1dGV2 YWwtMDMxOCk6IE1ldGhvZCBleGVjdXRpb24gZmFpbGVkIFtcXF9TQl8uQkFU MC5fVUlEXSAoTm9kZSAweGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4NDApLCBBRV9BTUxfTk9f T1BFUkFORApBQ1BJIEVycm9yOiBObyBvYmplY3QgYXR0YWNoZWQgdG8gbm9k ZSAweGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4NDAgKDIwMTAwMzMxL2V4cmVzbnRlLTIxMSkK QUNQSSBFcnJvciAodXRldmFsLTAzMTgpOiBNZXRob2QgZXhlY3V0aW9uIGZh aWxlZCBbXFxfU0JfLkJBVDAuX1VJRF0gKE5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhh ODQwKSwgQUVfQU1MX05PX09QRVJBTkQKQUNQSSBFcnJvcjogTm8gb2JqZWN0 IGF0dGFjaGVkIHRvIG5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwICgyMDEwMDMz MS9leHJlc250ZS0yMTEpCkFDUEkgRXJyb3IgKHV0ZXZhbC0wMzE4KTogTWV0 aG9kIGV4ZWN1dGlvbiBmYWlsZWQgW1xcX1NCXy5CQVQwLl9VSURdIChOb2Rl IDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0MCksIEFFX0FNTF9OT19PUEVSQU5ECkFDUEkg RXJyb3I6IE5vIG9iamVjdCBhdHRhY2hlZCB0byBub2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAw MTY4YTg0MCAoMjAxMDAzMzEvZXhyZXNudGUtMjExKQpBQ1BJIEVycm9yICh1 dGV2YWwtMDMxOCk6IE1ldGhvZCBleGVjdXRpb24gZmFpbGVkIFtcXF9TQl8u QkFUMC5fVUlEXSAoTm9kZSAweGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4NDApLCBBRV9BTUxf Tk9fT1BFUkFORApBQ1BJIEVycm9yOiBObyBvYmplY3QgYXR0YWNoZWQgdG8g bm9kZSAweGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4NDAgKDIwMTAwMzMxL2V4cmVzbnRlLTIx MSkKQUNQSSBFcnJvciAodXRldmFsLTAzMTgpOiBNZXRob2QgZXhlY3V0aW9u IGZhaWxlZCBbXFxfU0JfLkJBVDAuX1VJRF0gKE5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAx NjhhODQwKSwgQUVfQU1MX05PX09QRVJBTkQKQUNQSSBFcnJvcjogTm8gb2Jq ZWN0IGF0dGFjaGVkIHRvIG5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwICgyMDEw MDMzMS9leHJlc250ZS0yMTEpCkFDUEkgRXJyb3IgKHV0ZXZhbC0wMzE4KTog TWV0aG9kIGV4ZWN1dGlvbiBmYWlsZWQgW1xcX1NCXy5CQVQwLl9VSURdIChO b2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0MCksIEFFX0FNTF9OT19PUEVSQU5ECkFD UEkgRXJyb3I6IE5vIG9iamVjdCBhdHRhY2hlZCB0byBub2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZm MDAwMTY4YTg0MCAoMjAxMDAzMzEvZXhyZXNudGUtMjExKQpBQ1BJIEVycm9y ICh1dGV2YWwtMDMxOCk6IE1ldGhvZCBleGVjdXRpb24gZmFpbGVkIFtcXF9T Ql8uQkFUMC5fVUlEXSAoTm9kZSAweGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4NDApLCBBRV9B TUxfTk9fT1BFUkFORApBQ1BJIEVycm9yOiBObyBvYmplY3QgYXR0YWNoZWQg dG8gbm9kZSAweGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4NDAgKDIwMTAwMzMxL2V4cmVzbnRl LTIxMSkKQUNQSSBFcnJvciAodXRldmFsLTAzMTgpOiBNZXRob2QgZXhlY3V0 aW9uIGZhaWxlZCBbXFxfU0JfLkJBVDAuX1VJRF0gKE5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYw MDAxNjhhODQwKSwgQUVfQU1MX05PX09QRVJBTkQKQUNQSSBFcnJvcjogTm8g b2JqZWN0IGF0dGFjaGVkIHRvIG5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwICgy MDEwMDMzMS9leHJlc250ZS0yMTEpCkFDUEkgRXJyb3IgKHV0ZXZhbC0wMzE4 KTogTWV0aG9kIGV4ZWN1dGlvbiBmYWlsZWQgW1xcX1NCXy5CQVQwLl9VSURd IChOb2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0MCksIEFFX0FNTF9OT19PUEVSQU5E CkFDUEkgRXJyb3I6IE5vIG9iamVjdCBhdHRhY2hlZCB0byBub2RlIDB4ZmZm ZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0MCAoMjAxMDAzMzEvZXhyZXNudGUtMjExKQpBQ1BJIEVy cm9yICh1dGV2YWwtMDMxOCk6IE1ldGhvZCBleGVjdXRpb24gZmFpbGVkIFtc XF9TQl8uQkFUMC5fVUlEXSAoTm9kZSAweGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4NDApLCBB RV9BTUxfTk9fT1BFUkFORApBQ1BJIEVycm9yOiBObyBvYmplY3QgYXR0YWNo ZWQgdG8gbm9kZSAweGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4NDAgKDIwMTAwMzMxL2V4cmVz bnRlLTIxMSkKQUNQSSBFcnJvciAodXRldmFsLTAzMTgpOiBNZXRob2QgZXhl Y3V0aW9uIGZhaWxlZCBbXFxfU0JfLkJBVDAuX1VJRF0gKE5vZGUgMHhmZmZm ZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwKSwgQUVfQU1MX05PX09QRVJBTkQKQUNQSSBFcnJvcjog Tm8gb2JqZWN0IGF0dGFjaGVkIHRvIG5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQw ICgyMDEwMDMzMS9leHJlc250ZS0yMTEpCkFDUEkgRXJyb3IgKHV0ZXZhbC0w MzE4KTogTWV0aG9kIGV4ZWN1dGlvbiBmYWlsZWQgW1xcX1NCXy5CQVQwLl9V SURdIChOb2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0MCksIEFFX0FNTF9OT19PUEVS QU5ECkFDUEkgRXJyb3I6IE5vIG9iamVjdCBhdHRhY2hlZCB0byBub2RlIDB4 ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0MCAoMjAxMDAzMzEvZXhyZXNudGUtMjExKQpBQ1BJ IEVycm9yICh1dGV2YWwtMDMxOCk6IE1ldGhvZCBleGVjdXRpb24gZmFpbGVk IFtcXF9TQl8uQkFUMC5fVUlEXSAoTm9kZSAweGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4NDAp LCBBRV9BTUxfTk9fT1BFUkFORApBQ1BJIEVycm9yOiBObyBvYmplY3QgYXR0 YWNoZWQgdG8gbm9kZSAweGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4NDAgKDIwMTAwMzMxL2V4 cmVzbnRlLTIxMSkKQUNQSSBFcnJvciAodXRldmFsLTAzMTgpOiBNZXRob2Qg ZXhlY3V0aW9uIGZhaWxlZCBbXFxfU0JfLkJBVDAuX1VJRF0gKE5vZGUgMHhm ZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwKSwgQUVfQU1MX05PX09QRVJBTkQKQUNQSSBFcnJv cjogTm8gb2JqZWN0IGF0dGFjaGVkIHRvIG5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhh ODQwICgyMDEwMDMzMS9leHJlc250ZS0yMTEpCkFDUEkgRXJyb3IgKHV0ZXZh bC0wMzE4KTogTWV0aG9kIGV4ZWN1dGlvbiBmYWlsZWQgW1xcX1NCXy5CQVQw Ll9VSURdIChOb2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0MCksIEFFX0FNTF9OT19P UEVSQU5ECkFDUEkgRXJyb3I6IE5vIG9iamVjdCBhdHRhY2hlZCB0byBub2Rl IDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0MCAoMjAxMDAzMzEvZXhyZXNudGUtMjExKQpB Q1BJIEVycm9yICh1dGV2YWwtMDMxOCk6IE1ldGhvZCBleGVjdXRpb24gZmFp bGVkIFtcXF9TQl8uQkFUMC5fVUlEXSAoTm9kZSAweGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4 NDApLCBBRV9BTUxfTk9fT1BFUkFORApBQ1BJIEVycm9yOiBObyBvYmplY3Qg YXR0YWNoZWQgdG8gbm9kZSAweGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4NDAgKDIwMTAwMzMx L2V4cmVzbnRlLTIxMSkKQUNQSSBFcnJvciAodXRldmFsLTAzMTgpOiBNZXRo b2QgZXhlY3V0aW9uIGZhaWxlZCBbXFxfU0JfLkJBVDAuX1VJRF0gKE5vZGUg MHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwKSwgQUVfQU1MX05PX09QRVJBTkQKQUNQSSBF cnJvcjogTm8gb2JqZWN0IGF0dGFjaGVkIHRvIG5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAx NjhhODQwICgyMDEwMDMzMS9leHJlc250ZS0yMTEpCkFDUEkgRXJyb3IgKHV0 ZXZhbC0wMzE4KTogTWV0aG9kIGV4ZWN1dGlvbiBmYWlsZWQgW1xcX1NCXy5C QVQwLl9VSURdIChOb2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0MCksIEFFX0FNTF9O T19PUEVSQU5ECkFDUEkgRXJyb3I6IE5vIG9iamVjdCBhdHRhY2hlZCB0byBu b2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0MCAoMjAxMDAzMzEvZXhyZXNudGUtMjEx KQpBQ1BJIEVycm9yICh1dGV2YWwtMDMxOCk6IE1ldGhvZCBleGVjdXRpb24g ZmFpbGVkIFtcXF9TQl8uQkFUMC5fVUlEXSAoTm9kZSAweGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2 OGE4NDApLCBBRV9BTUxfTk9fT1BFUkFORApBQ1BJIEVycm9yOiBObyBvYmpl Y3QgYXR0YWNoZWQgdG8gbm9kZSAweGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4NDAgKDIwMTAw MzMxL2V4cmVzbnRlLTIxMSkKQUNQSSBFcnJvciAodXRldmFsLTAzMTgpOiBN ZXRob2QgZXhlY3V0aW9uIGZhaWxlZCBbXFxfU0JfLkJBVDAuX1VJRF0gKE5v ZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwKSwgQUVfQU1MX05PX09QRVJBTkQKQUNQ SSBFcnJvcjogTm8gb2JqZWN0IGF0dGFjaGVkIHRvIG5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYw MDAxNjhhODQwICgyMDEwMDMzMS9leHJlc250ZS0yMTEpCkFDUEkgRXJyb3Ig KHV0ZXZhbC0wMzE4KTogTWV0aG9kIGV4ZWN1dGlvbiBmYWlsZWQgW1xcX1NC Xy5CQVQwLl9VSURdIChOb2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0MCksIEFFX0FN TF9OT19PUEVSQU5ECkFDUEkgRXJyb3I6IE5vIG9iamVjdCBhdHRhY2hlZCB0 byBub2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0MCAoMjAxMDAzMzEvZXhyZXNudGUt MjExKQpBQ1BJIEVycm9yICh1dGV2YWwtMDMxOCk6IE1ldGhvZCBleGVjdXRp b24gZmFpbGVkIFtcXF9TQl8uQkFUMC5fVUlEXSAoTm9kZSAweGZmZmZmZjAw MDE2OGE4NDApLCBBRV9BTUxfTk9fT1BFUkFORApBQ1BJIEVycm9yOiBObyBv YmplY3QgYXR0YWNoZWQgdG8gbm9kZSAweGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4NDAgKDIw MTAwMzMxL2V4cmVzbnRlLTIxMSkKQUNQSSBFcnJvciAodXRldmFsLTAzMTgp OiBNZXRob2QgZXhlY3V0aW9uIGZhaWxlZCBbXFxfU0JfLkJBVDAuX1VJRF0g KE5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwKSwgQUVfQU1MX05PX09QRVJBTkQK QUNQSSBFcnJvcjogTm8gb2JqZWN0IGF0dGFjaGVkIHRvIG5vZGUgMHhmZmZm ZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwICgyMDEwMDMzMS9leHJlc250ZS0yMTEpCkFDUEkgRXJy b3IgKHV0ZXZhbC0wMzE4KTogTWV0aG9kIGV4ZWN1dGlvbiBmYWlsZWQgW1xc X1NCXy5CQVQwLl9VSURdIChOb2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0MCksIEFF X0FNTF9OT19PUEVSQU5ECkFDUEkgRXJyb3I6IE5vIG9iamVjdCBhdHRhY2hl ZCB0byBub2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0MCAoMjAxMDAzMzEvZXhyZXNu dGUtMjExKQpBQ1BJIEVycm9yICh1dGV2YWwtMDMxOCk6IE1ldGhvZCBleGVj dXRpb24gZmFpbGVkIFtcXF9TQl8uQkFUMC5fVUlEXSAoTm9kZSAweGZmZmZm ZjAwMDE2OGE4NDApLCBBRV9BTUxfTk9fT1BFUkFORApBQ1BJIEVycm9yOiBO byBvYmplY3QgYXR0YWNoZWQgdG8gbm9kZSAweGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4NDAg KDIwMTAwMzMxL2V4cmVzbnRlLTIxMSkKQUNQSSBFcnJvciAodXRldmFsLTAz MTgpOiBNZXRob2QgZXhlY3V0aW9uIGZhaWxlZCBbXFxfU0JfLkJBVDAuX1VJ RF0gKE5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwKSwgQUVfQU1MX05PX09QRVJB TkQKQUNQSSBFcnJvcjogTm8gb2JqZWN0IGF0dGFjaGVkIHRvIG5vZGUgMHhm ZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwICgyMDEwMDMzMS9leHJlc250ZS0yMTEpCkFDUEkg RXJyb3I6IE5vIG9iamVjdCBhdHRhY2hlZCB0byBub2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAw MTY4YTg0MCAoMjAxMDAzMzEvZUF4Q3JQZUlzIG5FdHJlci1vcjIxIDEpKAp1 dGV2YWwtMDMxOCk6IEFDUElNIGVFdHJocm9vcmQgIGUoeGV1Y3R1ZXR2aWFv bG4tIGZhMGkzbDFlOGQpIDpbIFxcX1NCXy5CQVQwLl9VSURdIChOb2RlIDB4 ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0MCksIEFFX0FNTF9OT19PUEVSQU5ECk1ldGhvZCBl eGVjdXRpb24gZmFpbGVkIFtcXF9TQl8uQkFUMC5fVUlEXSAoTm9kZSAweGZm ZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4NDApLCBBRV9BTUxfTk9fT1BFUkFORApBQ1BJIEVycm9y OiBObyBvYmplY3QgYXR0YWNoZWQgdG8gbm9kZSAweGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4 NDAgKDIwMTAwMzMxL2V4cmVzbnRlLTIxMSkKQUNQSSBFcnJvciAodXRldmFs LTAzMTgpOiBNZXRob2QgZXhlY3V0aW9uIGZhaWxlZCBbXFxfU0JfLkJBVDAu X1VJRF0gKE5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwKSwgQUVfQU1MX05PX09Q RVJBTkQKQUNQSSBFcnJvcjogTm8gb2JqZWN0IGF0dGFjaGVkIHRvIG5vZGUg MHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwICgyMDEwMDMzMS9leHJlc250ZS0yMTEpCkFD UEkgRXJyb3IgKHV0ZXZhbC0wMzE4KTogTWV0aG9kIGV4ZWN1dGlvbiBmYWls ZWQgW1xcX1NCXy5CQVQwLl9VSURdIChOb2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0 MCksIEFFX0FNTF9OT19PUEVSQU5ECkFDUEkgRXJyb3I6IE5vIG9iamVjdCBh dHRhY2hlZCB0byBub2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0MCAoMjAxMDAzMzEv ZXhyZXNudGUtMjExKQpBQ1BJIEVycm9yICh1dGV2YWwtMDMxOCk6IE1ldGhv ZCBleGVjdXRpb24gZmFpbGVkIFtcXF9TQl8uQkFUMC5fVUlEXSAoTm9kZSAw eGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4NDApLCBBRV9BTUxfTk9fT1BFUkFORApBQ1BJIEVy cm9yOiBObyBvYmplY3QgYXR0YWNoZWQgdG8gbm9kZSAweGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2 OGE4NDAgKDIwMTAwMzMxL2V4cmVzbnRlLTIxMSkKQUNQSSBFcnJvciAodXRl dmFsLTAzMTgpOiBNZXRob2QgZXhlY3V0aW9uIGZhaWxlZCBbXFxfU0JfLkJB VDAuX1VJRF0gKE5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwKSwgQUVfQU1MX05P X09QRVJBTkQKQUNQSSBFcnJvcjogTm8gb2JqZWN0IGF0dGFjaGVkIHRvIG5v ZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwICgyMDEwMDMzMS9leHJlc250ZS0yMTEp CkFDUEkgRXJyb3IgKHV0ZXZhbC0wMzE4KTogTWV0aG9kIGV4ZWN1dGlvbiBm YWlsZWQgW1xcX1NCXy5CQVQwLl9VSURdIChOb2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4 YTg0MCksIEFFX0FNTF9OT19PUEVSQU5ECkFDUEkgRXJyb3I6IE5vIG9iamVj dCBhdHRhY2hlZCB0byBub2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0MCAoMjAxMDAz MzEvZXhyZXNudGUtMjExKQpBQ1BJIEVycm9yICh1dGV2YWwtMDMxOCk6IE1l dGhvZCBleGVjdXRpb24gZmFpbGVkIFtcXF9TQl8uQkFUMC5fVUlEXSAoTm9k ZSAweGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4NDApLCBBRV9BTUxfTk9fT1BFUkFORApBQ1BJ IEVycm9yOiBObyBvYmplY3QgYXR0YWNoZWQgdG8gbm9kZSAweGZmZmZmZjAw MDE2OGE4NDAgKDIwMTAwMzMxL2V4cmVzbnRlLTIxMSkKQUNQSSBFcnJvciAo dXRldmFsLTAzMTgpOiBNZXRob2QgZXhlY3V0aW9uIGZhaWxlZCBbXFxfU0Jf LkJBVDAuX1VJRF0gKE5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwKSwgQUVfQU1M X05PX09QRVJBTkQKQUNQSSBFcnJvcjogTm8gb2JqZWN0IGF0dGFjaGVkIHRv IG5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwICgyMDEwMDMzMS9leHJlc250ZS0y MTEpCkFDUEkgRXJyb3IgKHV0ZXZhbC0wMzE4KTogTWV0aG9kIGV4ZWN1dGlv biBmYWlsZWQgW1xcX1NCXy5CQVQwLl9VSURdIChOb2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAw MTY4YTg0MCksIEFFX0FNTF9OT19PUEVSQU5ECkFDUEkgRXJyb3I6IE5vIG9i amVjdCBhdHRhY2hlZCB0byBub2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0MCAoMjAx MDAzMzEvZXhyZXNudGUtMjExKQpBQ1BJIEVycm9yICh1dGV2YWwtMDMxOCk6 IE1ldGhvZCBleGVjdXRpb24gZmFpbGVkIFtcXF9TQl8uQkFUMC5fVUlEXSAo Tm9kZSAweGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4NDApLCBBRV9BTUxfTk9fT1BFUkFORApB Q1BJIEVycm9yOiBObyBvYmplY3QgYXR0YWNoZWQgdG8gbm9kZSAweGZmZmZm ZjAwMDE2OGE4NDAgKDIwMTAwMzMxL2V4cmVzbnRlLTIxMSkKQUNQSSBFcnJv ciAodXRldmFsLTAzMTgpOiBNZXRob2QgZXhlY3V0aW9uIGZhaWxlZCBbXFxf U0JfLkJBVDAuX1VJRF0gKE5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwKSwgQUVf QU1MX05PX09QRVJBTkQKQUNQSSBFcnJvcjogTm8gb2JqZWN0IGF0dGFjaGVk IHRvIG5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwICgyMDEwMDMzMS9leHJlc250 ZS0yMTEpCkFDUEkgRXJyb3IgKHV0ZXZhbC0wMzE4KTogTWV0aG9kIGV4ZWN1 dGlvbiBmYWlsZWQgW1xcX1NCXy5CQVQwLl9VSURdIChOb2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZm MDAwMTY4YTg0MCksIEFFX0FNTF9OT19PUEVSQU5ECkFDUEkgRXJyb3I6IE5v IG9iamVjdCBhdHRhY2hlZCB0byBub2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0MCAo MjAxMDAzMzEvZXhyZXNudGUtMjExKQpBQ1BJIEVycm9yICh1dGV2YWwtMDMx OCk6IE1ldGhvZCBleGVjdXRpb24gZmFpbGVkIFtcXF9TQl8uQkFUMC5fVUlE XSAoTm9kZSAweGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4NDApLCBBRV9BTUxfTk9fT1BFUkFO RApBQ1BJIEVycm9yOiBObyBvYmplY3QgYXR0YWNoZWQgdG8gbm9kZSAweGZm ZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4NDAgKDIwMTAwMzMxL2V4cmVzbnRlLTIxMSkKQUNQSSBF cnJvciAodXRldmFsLTAzMTgpOiBNZXRob2QgZXhlY3V0aW9uIGZhaWxlZCBb XFxfU0JfLkJBVDAuX1VJRF0gKE5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwKSwg QUVfQU1MX05PX09QRVJBTkQKQUNQSSBFcnJvcjogTm8gb2JqZWN0IGF0dGFj aGVkIHRvIG5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwICgyMDEwMDMzMS9leHJl c250ZS0yMTEpCkFDUEkgRXJyb3IgKHV0ZXZhbC0wMzE4KTogTWV0aG9kIGV4 ZWN1dGlvbiBmYWlsZWQgW1xcX1NCXy5CQVQwLl9VSURdIChOb2RlIDB4ZmZm ZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0MCksIEFFX0FNTF9OT19PUEVSQU5ECkFDUEkgRXJyb3I6 IE5vIG9iamVjdCBhdHRhY2hlZCB0byBub2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0 MCAoMjAxMDAzMzEvZXhyZXNudGUtMjExKQpBQ1BJIEVycm9yICh1dGV2YWwt MDMxOCk6IE1ldGhvZCBleGVjdXRpb24gZmFpbGVkIFtcXF9TQl8uQkFUMC5f VUlEXSAoTm9kZSAweGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4NDApLCBBRV9BTUxfTk9fT1BF UkFORApBQ1BJIEVycm9yOiBObyBvYmplY3QgYXR0YWNoZWQgdG8gbm9kZSAw eGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4NDAgKDIwMTAwMzMxL2V4cmVzbnRlLTIxMSkKQUNQ SSBFcnJvciAodXRldmFsLTAzMTgpOiBNZXRob2QgZXhlY3V0aW9uIGZhaWxl ZCBbXFxfU0JfLkJBVDAuX1VJRF0gKE5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQw KSwgQUVfQU1MX05PX09QRVJBTkQKQUNQSSBFcnJvcjogTm8gb2JqZWN0IGF0 dGFjaGVkIHRvIG5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwICgyMDEwMDMzMS9l eHJlc250ZS0yMTEpCkFDUEkgRXJyb3IgKHV0ZXZhbC0wMzE4KTogTWV0aG9k IGV4ZWN1dGlvbiBmYWlsZWQgW1xcX1NCXy5CQVQwLl9VSURdIChOb2RlIDB4 ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0MCksIEFFX0FNTF9OT19PUEVSQU5ECkFDUEkgRXJy b3I6IE5vIG9iamVjdCBhdHRhY2hlZCB0byBub2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4 YTg0MCAoMjAxMDAzMzEvZXhyZXNudGUtMjExKQpBQ1BJIEVycm9yICh1dGV2 YWwtMDMxOCk6IE1ldGhvZCBleGVjdXRpb24gZmFpbGVkIFtcXF9TQl8uQkFU MC5fVUlEXSAoTm9kZSAweGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4NDApLCBBRV9BTUxfTk9f T1BFUkFORApBQ1BJIEVycm9yOiBObyBvYmplY3QgYXR0YWNoZWQgdG8gbm9k ZSAweGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4NDAgKDIwMTAwMzMxL2V4cmVzbnRlLTIxMSkK QUNQSSBFcnJvciAodXRldmFsLTAzMTgpOiBNZXRob2QgZXhlY3V0aW9uIGZh aWxlZCBbXFxfU0JfLkJBVDAuX1VJRF0gKE5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhh ODQwKSwgQUVfQU1MX05PX09QRVJBTkQKQUNQSSBFcnJvcjogTm8gb2JqZWN0 IGF0dGFjaGVkIHRvIG5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwICgyMDEwMDMz MS9leHJlc250ZS0yMTEpCkFDUEkgRXJyb3IgKHV0ZXZhbC0wMzE4KTogTWV0 aG9kIGV4ZWN1dGlvbiBmYWlsZWQgW1xcX1NCXy5CQVQwLl9VSURdIChOb2Rl IDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0MCksIEFFX0FNTF9OT19PUEVSQU5ECkFDUEkg RXJyb3I6IE5vIG9iamVjdCBhdHRhY2hlZCB0byBub2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAw MTY4YTg0MCAoMjAxMDAzMzEvZXhyZXNudGUtMjExKQpBQ1BJIEVycm9yICh1 dGV2YWwtMDMxOCk6IE1ldGhvZCBleGVjdXRpb24gZmFpbGVkIFtcXF9TQl8u QkFUMC5fVUlEXSAoTm9kZSAweGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4NDApLCBBRV9BTUxf Tk9fT1BFUkFORApwaWQgMTM5OSAoaW5pdGlhbCB0aHJlYWQpIGlzIHVzaW5n IGxlZ2FjeSBwdHkgZGV2aWNlcyAtIG5vdCBsb2dnaW5nIGFueW1vcmUKQUNQ SSBFcnJvcjogTm8gb2JqZWN0IGF0dGFjaGVkIHRvIG5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYw MDAxNjhhODQwICgyMDEwMDMzMS9leHJlc250ZS0yMTEpCkFDUEkgRXJyb3Ig KHV0ZXZhbC0wMzE4KTogTWV0aG9kIGV4ZWN1dGlvbiBmYWlsZWQgW1xcX1NC Xy5CQVQwLl9VSURdIChOb2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0MCksIEFFX0FN TF9OT19PUEVSQU5ECkFDUEkgRXJyb3I6IE5vIG9iamVjdCBhdHRhY2hlZCB0 byBub2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0MCAoMjAxMDAzMzEvZXhyZXNudGUt MjExKQpBQ1BJIEVycm9yICh1dGV2YWwtMDMxOCk6IE1ldGhvZCBleGVjdXRp b24gZmFpbGVkIFtcXF9TQl8uQkFUMC5fVUlEXSAoTm9kZSAweGZmZmZmZjAw MDE2OGE4NDApLCBBRV9BTUxfTk9fT1BFUkFORApBQ1BJIEVycm9yOiBObyBv YmplY3QgYXR0YWNoZWQgdG8gbm9kZSAweGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4NDAgKDIw MTAwMzMxL2V4cmVzbnRlLTIxMSkKQUNQSSBFcnJvciAodXRldmFsLTAzMTgp OiBNZXRob2QgZXhlY3V0aW9uIGZhaWxlZCBbXFxfU0JfLkJBVDAuX1VJRF0g KE5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwKSwgQUVfQU1MX05PX09QRVJBTkQK QUNQSSBFcnJvcjogTm8gb2JqZWN0IGF0dGFjaGVkIHRvIG5vZGUgMHhmZmZm ZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwICgyMDEwMDMzMS9leHJlc250ZS0yMTEpCkFDUEkgRXJy b3IgKHV0ZXZhbC0wMzE4KTogTWV0aG9kIGV4ZWN1dGlvbiBmYWlsZWQgW1xc X1NCXy5CQVQwLl9VSURdIChOb2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0MCksIEFF X0FNTF9OT19PUEVSQU5ECkFDUEkgRXJyb3I6IE5vIG9iamVjdCBhdHRhY2hl ZCB0byBub2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0MCAoMjAxMDAzMzEvZXhyZXNu dGUtMjExKQpBQ1BJIEVycm9yICh1dGV2YWwtMDMxOCk6IE1ldGhvZCBleGVj dXRpb24gZmFpbGVkIFtcXF9TQl8uQkFUMC5fVUlEXSAoTm9kZSAweGZmZmZm ZjAwMDE2OGE4NDApLCBBRV9BTUxfTk9fT1BFUkFORApBQ1BJIEVycm9yOiBO byBvYmplY3QgYXR0YWNoZWQgdG8gbm9kZSAweGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4NDAg KDIwMTAwMzMxL2V4cmVzbnRlLTIxMSkKQUNQSSBFcnJvciAodXRldmFsLTAz MTgpOiBNZXRob2QgZXhlY3V0aW9uIGZhaWxlZCBbXFxfU0JfLkJBVDAuX1VJ RF0gKE5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwKSwgQUVfQU1MX05PX09QRVJB TkQKQUNQSSBFcnJvcjogTm8gb2JqZWN0IGF0dGFjaGVkIHRvIG5vZGUgMHhm ZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwICgyMDEwMDMzMS9leHJlc250ZS0yMTEpCkFDUEkg RXJyb3IgKHV0ZXZhbC0wMzE4KTogTWV0aG9kIGV4ZWN1dGlvbiBmYWlsZWQg W1xcX1NCXy5CQVQwLl9VSURdIChOb2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0MCks IEFFX0FNTF9OT19PUEVSQU5ECkFDUEkgRXJyb3I6IE5vIG9iamVjdCBhdHRh Y2hlZCB0byBub2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0MCAoMjAxMDAzMzEvZXhy ZXNudGUtMjExKQpBQ1BJIEVycm9yICh1dGV2YWwtMDMxOCk6IE1ldGhvZCBl eGVjdXRpb24gZmFpbGVkIFtcXF9TQl8uQkFUMC5fVUlEXSAoTm9kZSAweGZm ZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4NDApLCBBRV9BTUxfTk9fT1BFUkFORApBQ1BJIEVycm9y OiBObyBvYmplY3QgYXR0YWNoZWQgdG8gbm9kZSAweGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4 NDAgKDIwMTAwMzMxL2V4cmVzbnRlLTIxMSkKQUNQSSBFcnJvciAodXRldmFs LTAzMTgpOiBNZXRob2QgZXhlY3V0aW9uIGZhaWxlZCBbXFxfU0JfLkJBVDAu X1VJRF0gKE5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwKSwgQUVfQU1MX05PX09Q RVJBTkQKQUNQSSBFcnJvcjogTm8gb2JqZWN0IGF0dGFjaGVkIHRvIG5vZGUg MHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwICgyMDEwMDMzMS9leHJlc250ZS0yMTEpCkFD UEkgRXJyb3IgKHV0ZXZhbC0wMzE4KTogTWV0aG9kIGV4ZWN1dGlvbiBmYWls ZWQgW1xcX1NCXy5CQVQwLl9VSURdIChOb2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0 MCksIEFFX0FNTF9OT19PUEVSQU5ECkFDUEkgRXJyb3I6IE5vIG9iamVjdCBh dHRhY2hlZCB0byBub2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0MCAoMjAxMDAzMzEv ZXhyZXNudGUtMjExKQpBQ1BJIEVycm9yICh1dGV2YWwtMDMxOCk6IE1ldGhv ZCBleGVjdXRpb24gZmFpbGVkIFtcXF9TQl8uQkFUMC5fVUlEXSAoTm9kZSAw eGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4NDApLCBBRV9BTUxfTk9fT1BFUkFORApBQ1BJIEVy cm9yOiBObyBvYmplY3QgYXR0YWNoZWQgdG8gbm9kZSAweGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2 OGE4NDAgKDIwMTAwMzMxL2V4cmVzbnRlLTIxMSkKQUNQSSBFcnJvciAodXRl dmFsLTAzMTgpOiBNZXRob2QgZXhlY3V0aW9uIGZhaWxlZCBbXFxfU0JfLkJB VDAuX1VJRF0gKE5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwKSwgQUVfQU1MX05P X09QRVJBTkQKQUNQSSBFcnJvcjogTm8gb2JqZWN0IGF0dGFjaGVkIHRvIG5v ZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwICgyMDEwMDMzMS9leHJlc250ZS0yMTEp CkFDUEkgRXJyb3IgKHV0ZXZhbC0wMzE4KTogTWV0aG9kIGV4ZWN1dGlvbiBm YWlsZWQgW1xcX1NCXy5CQVQwLl9VSURdIChOb2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4 YTg0MCksIEFFX0FNTF9OT19PUEVSQU5ECkFDUEkgRXJyb3I6IE5vIG9iamVj dCBhdHRhY2hlZCB0byBub2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0MCAoMjAxMDAz MzEvZXhyZXNudGUtMjExKQpBQ1BJIEVycm9yICh1dGV2YWwtMDMxOCk6IE1l dGhvZCBleGVjdXRpb24gZmFpbGVkIFtcXF9TQl8uQkFUMC5fVUlEXSAoTm9k ZSAweGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4NDApLCBBRV9BTUxfTk9fT1BFUkFORApBQ1BJ IEVycm9yOiBObyBvYmplY3QgYXR0YWNoZWQgdG8gbm9kZSAweGZmZmZmZjAw MDE2OGE4NDAgKDIwMTAwMzMxL2V4cmVzbnRlLTIxMSkKQUNQSSBFcnJvciAo dXRldmFsLTAzMTgpOiBNZXRob2QgZXhlY3V0aW9uIGZhaWxlZCBbXFxfU0Jf LkJBVDAuX1VJRF0gKE5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwKSwgQUVfQU1M X05PX09QRVJBTkQKQUNQSSBFcnJvcjogTm8gb2JqZWN0IGF0dGFjaGVkIHRv IG5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwICgyMDEwMDMzMS9leHJlc250ZS0y MTEpCkFDUEkgRXJyb3I6IE5vIG9iamVjdCBhdHRhY2hlZCB0byBub2RlQSBD UEkgRXJyMG94ZnJmZiBmKGZ1ZnQwZTB2MGExbDYtOGE4NDAwMyAxKDgpOiAy MDEwMDMzMS9leHJlc250ZS0yMTEpCk1ldGhvZCBleGVjdXRpb24gZmFpbGVk IFtcXF9TQl8uQkFUMC5fVUlEXSAoTkFvQ2RQZUkgIEVycm9yMCB4KHVmdGZl ZnZmYWZsZi0wMDAzMDExODYpODphIDg0MCksIEFFX0FNTF9OT19PUEVSQU5E Ck1ldGhvZCBleGVjdXRpb24gZmFpbGVkIFtcXF9TQl8uQkFUMC5fVUlEXSAo Tm9kZSAweGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4NDApLCBBRV9BTUxfTk9fT1BFUkFORApB Q1BJIEVycm9yOiBObyBvYmplY3QgYXR0YWNoZWQgdG8gbm9kZSAweGZmZmZm ZjAwMDE2OGE4NDAgKDIwMTAwMzMxL2V4cmVzbnRlLTIxMSkKQUNQSSBFcnJv ciAodXRldmFsLTAzMTgpOiBNZXRob2QgZXhlY3V0aW9uIGZhaWxlZCBbXFxf U0JfLkJBVDAuX1VJRF0gKE5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwKSwgQUVf QU1MX05PX09QRVJBTkQKQUNQSSBFcnJvcjogTm8gb2JqZWN0IGF0dGFjaGVk IHRvIG5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwICgyMDEwMDMzMS9leHJlc250 ZS0yMTEpCkFDUEkgRXJyb3IgKHV0ZXZhbC0wMzE4KTogTWV0aG9kIGV4ZWN1 dGlvbiBmYWlsZWQgW1xcX1NCXy5CQVQwLl9VSURdIChOb2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZm MDAwMTY4YTg0MCksIEFFX0FNTF9OT19PUEVSQU5ECkFDUEkgRXJyb3I6IE5v IG9iamVjdCBhdHRhY2hlZCB0byBub2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0MCAo MjAxMDAzMzEvZXhyZXNudGUtMjExKQpBQ1BJIEVycm9yICh1dGV2YWwtMDMx OCk6IE1ldGhvZCBleGVjdXRpb24gZmFpbGVkIFtcXF9TQl8uQkFUMC5fVUlE XSAoTm9kZSAweGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4NDApLCBBRV9BTUxfTk9fT1BFUkFO RApBQ1BJIEVycm9yOiBObyBvYmplY3QgYXR0YWNoZWQgdG8gbm9kZSAweGZm ZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4NDAgKDIwMTAwMzMxL2V4cmVzbnRlLTIxMSkKQUNQSSBF cnJvciAodXRldmFsLTAzMTgpOiBNZXRob2QgZXhlY3V0aW9uIGZhaWxlZCBb XFxfU0JfLkJBVDAuX1VJRF0gKE5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwKSwg QUVfQU1MX05PX09QRVJBTkQKQUNQSSBFcnJvcjogTm8gb2JqZWN0IGF0dGFj aGVkIHRvIG5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwICgyMDEwMDMzMS9leHJl c250ZS0yMTEpCkFDUEkgRXJyb3IgKHV0ZXZhbC0wMzE4KTogTWV0aG9kIGV4 ZWN1dGlvbiBmYWlsZWQgW1xcX1NCXy5CQVQwLl9VSURdIChOb2RlIDB4ZmZm ZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0MCksIEFFX0FNTF9OT19PUEVSQU5ECkFDUEkgRXJyb3I6 IE5vIG9iamVjdCBhdHRhY2hlZCB0byBub2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0 MCAoMjAxMDAzMzEvZXhyZXNudGUtMjExKQpBQ1BJIEVycm9yICh1dGV2YWwt MDMxOCk6IE1ldGhvZCBleGVjdXRpb24gZmFpbGVkIFtcXF9TQl8uQkFUMC5f VUlEXSAoTm9kZSAweGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4NDApLCBBRV9BTUxfTk9fT1BF UkFORApBQ1BJIEVycm9yOiBObyBvYmplY3QgYXR0YWNoZWQgdG8gbm9kZSAw eGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4NDAgKDIwMTAwMzMxL2V4cmVzbnRlLTIxMSkKQUNQ SSBFcnJvciAodXRldmFsLTAzMTgpOiBNZXRob2QgZXhlY3V0aW9uIGZhaWxl ZCBbXFxfU0JfLkJBVDAuX1VJRF0gKE5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQw KSwgQUVfQU1MX05PX09QRVJBTkQKQUNQSSBFcnJvcjogTm8gb2JqZWN0IGF0 dGFjaGVkIHRvIG5vZGUgMHhmZmZmZmYwMDAxNjhhODQwICgyMDEwMDMzMS9l eHJlc250ZS0yMTEpCkFDUEkgRXJyb3IgKHV0ZXZhbC0wMzE4KTogTWV0aG9k IGV4ZWN1dGlvbiBmYWlsZWQgW1xcX1NCXy5CQVQwLl9VSURdIChOb2RlIDB4 ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4YTg0MCksIEFFX0FNTF9OT19PUEVSQU5ECkFDUEkgRXJy b3I6IE5vIG9iamVjdCBhdHRhY2hlZCB0byBub2RlIDB4ZmZmZmZmMDAwMTY4 YTg0MCAoMjAxMDAzMzEvZXhyZXNudGUtMjExKQpBQ1BJIEVycm9yICh1dGV2 YWwtMDMxOCk6IE1ldGhvZCBleGVjdXRpb24gZmFpbGVkIFtcXF9TQl8uQkFU MC5fVUlEXSAoTm9kZSAweGZmZmZmZjAwMDE2OGE4NDApLCBBRV9BTUxfTk9f T1BFUkFORAo= --0-1728221267-1293056119=:14057-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 23 02:47:24 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0C1E106564A for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 02:47:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from elon@emmi.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de) Received: from emmi.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de (emmi.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de [130.149.58.146]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48E928FC15 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 02:47:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from emmi.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de (localhost.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de [127.0.0.1]) by emmi.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBN2lLMk097696; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 03:47:21 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from elon@emmi.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de) Received: (from elon@localhost) by emmi.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oBN2lLfO097695; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 03:47:21 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from elon) Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 03:47:21 +0100 From: Leon =?iso-8859-15?Q?Me=DFner?= To: Christer Solskogen Message-ID: <20101223024721.GH56228@emmi.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de> Mail-Followup-To: Christer Solskogen , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <201012211211.oBLCBbJW007155@mail.r-bonomi.com> <4D110D83.9080702@infracaninophile.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A jail with a dash in its name X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 02:47:25 -0000 On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 11:31:42PM +0100, Christer Solskogen wrote: > On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Matthew Seaman > wrote: > > > Of course, there's no problem with using the form 'forest-friend' on the > > RHS of any assignments, so long as it's properly quoted, of course. > > > > Thanks for all your help! > I chose to remove all hyphens instead. I use ezjail and have jails with hyphens. Everything works fine there. salut, Leon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 23 02:56:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70F0A106566B for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 02:56:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcw@speakeasy.net) Received: from mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.52]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5027F8FC13 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 02:56:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 18773 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2010 02:56:17 -0000 Received: from dsl081-163-120.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO w16.stradamotorsports.com) (jcw@[64.81.163.120]) (envelope-sender ) by mail7.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 23 Dec 2010 02:56:17 -0000 Message-ID: <4D12BA51.2010602@speakeasy.net> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 18:56:17 -0800 From: "Jason C. Wells" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100808 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd general questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Nullfs Allows Jailbreaking X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 02:56:18 -0000 Here is my file system scheme for a newly created jail as viewed from the host: /usr/jail/template on /usr/jail/f1 (nullfs, local, read-only) /usr/jail/f1-fs/etc on /usr/jail/f1/etc (nullfs, local) /usr/jail/f1-fs/tmp on /usr/jail/f1/tmp (nullfs, local) /usr/jail/f1-fs/var on /usr/jail/f1/var (nullfs, local) /usr/jail/f1-fs/usr-local on /usr/jail/f1/usr/local (nullfs, local) As viewed from the jail: /usr/jail/template on / (nullfs, local, read-only) I like the idea of using a template for multiple jails that I plan to use later. I like the ide of mounting the template read only. I had to splice in the other nullfs filesystems so that things that need to be read-write can be. But it seems kinda funky. Inside the jail it looks like EVERYTHING is read-only and you have no way of knowing that /tmp is actually read-write. There seems to be a violation of the segregation going on here. What pitfalls can you see in a file system scheme like this for my jails? Is the above behavior by design or did I find a flaw? Thanks, Jason From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 23 03:08:05 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A71AB1065670 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 03:08:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A5068FC12 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 03:08:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm16 with SMTP id 16so6351390fxm.13 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 19:08:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=wWv20VVS2X9uXwNyW6af6gVlwaguPKOLmwpp4or0JPo=; b=CwVVgnm2nIgptdELUT2PlT5yzrTpyyESiS6sDjqQ6cXosR4ZebGznJKx47b8MXBgZ9 rC+ck6Cvxp2MJHcdnHbjURRs2fv7tn4wzFPyrHbi04yDc3yq1GeC2gmrF3UneeidzD37 gqqa2fsCS5CaBVdkj2Tiu/m5nwihNoKxXX32c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=o/NNHJZ505ie8MuCBqkhciQ5I1Slebr32GufUGR/LVTvTC2EDzIKLeT+CvtLPFxQfw DmP1jyi1rCQKAr8ERYZJzIqeQPwZzqktEOsEPf6bgbsExdQCihDUck6CKgN+/Qj9Ankc ix0ysy16oP0T5K7B//eq2dsz01OE9IJ8SL+MI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.85.204 with SMTP id p12mr51286fal.146.1293073683869; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 19:08:03 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.114.4 with HTTP; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 19:08:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D12BA51.2010602@speakeasy.net> References: <4D12BA51.2010602@speakeasy.net> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 21:08:03 -0600 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: "Jason C. Wells" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd general questions Subject: Re: Nullfs Allows Jailbreaking X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 03:08:05 -0000 On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 8:56 PM, Jason C. Wells wrote: > I like the idea of using a template for multiple jails that I plan to use > later. I like the ide of mounting the template read only. I had to splice > in the other nullfs filesystems so that things that need to be read-write > can be. > > But it seems kinda funky. Inside the jail it looks like EVERYTHING is > read-only and you have no way of knowing that /tmp is actually read-write. > There seems to be a violation of the segregation going on here. > > What pitfalls can you see in a file system scheme like this for my jails? > Is the above behavior by design or did I find a flaw? > I think you're reinventing the wheel. The sysutils/ezjail already handles this gracefully in addition to many other features. For reference ezjail creates a layout like this: /usr/jails/www.example.com.device on /usr/jails/www.example.com (ufs, local, soft-updates) /usr/jails/basejail on /usr/jails/www.example.com/basejail (nullfs, local, read-only) devfs on /usr/jails/www.example.com/dev (devfs, local, multilabel) >From inside the jail you see: /usr/jails/www.example.com.device on / (ufs, local, soft-updates) -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 23 03:27:00 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57571106566C for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 03:27:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chad@shire.net) Received: from mail.shire.net (mail.freestylefund.com [209.41.94.250]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EED68FC0A for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 03:26:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from c-67-172-236-20.hsd1.ut.comcast.net ([67.172.236.20] helo=[192.168.99.216]) by mail.shire.net with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.51) id 1PVbPQ-0004Sx-EC; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 20:00:04 -0700 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" In-Reply-To: <4D12BA51.2010602@speakeasy.net> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 20:00:02 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <09452D14-1133-4282-ACF3-648D6607644A@shire.net> References: <4D12BA51.2010602@speakeasy.net> To: "Jason C. Wells" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 67.172.236.20 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: chad@shire.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.shire.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false Cc: freebsd general questions Subject: Re: Nullfs Allows Jailbreaking X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 03:27:00 -0000 On Dec 22, 2010, at 7:56 PM, Jason C. Wells wrote: > Here is my file system scheme for a newly created jail as viewed from = the host: >=20 > /usr/jail/template on /usr/jail/f1 (nullfs, local, read-only) > /usr/jail/f1-fs/etc on /usr/jail/f1/etc (nullfs, local) > /usr/jail/f1-fs/tmp on /usr/jail/f1/tmp (nullfs, local) > /usr/jail/f1-fs/var on /usr/jail/f1/var (nullfs, local) > /usr/jail/f1-fs/usr-local on /usr/jail/f1/usr/local (nullfs, local) >=20 > As viewed from the jail: >=20 > /usr/jail/template on / (nullfs, local, read-only) >=20 > I like the idea of using a template for multiple jails that I plan to = use later. I like the ide of mounting the template read only. I had to = splice in the other nullfs filesystems so that things that need to be = read-write can be. >=20 > But it seems kinda funky. Inside the jail it looks like EVERYTHING is = read-only and you have no way of knowing that /tmp is actually = read-write. There seems to be a violation of the segregation going on = here. >=20 > What pitfalls can you see in a file system scheme like this for my = jails? Is the above behavior by design or did I find a flaw? I have been doing this for years with great success. I don't = understand your question. How does it look like everything is read = only from inside the jail? The fact that a "df" only shows the root = filesystem and not all your others file systems? (assuming that is still = the truth -- my jails do this on older FBSD systems) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 23 03:41:17 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00AB4106566B for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 03:41:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jcw@speakeasy.net) Received: from mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D18848FC14 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 03:41:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 384 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2010 03:41:16 -0000 Received: from s6.stradamotorsports.com (HELO w16.stradamotorsports.com) (jcw@[64.81.163.124]) (envelope-sender ) by mail3.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 23 Dec 2010 03:41:16 -0000 Message-ID: <4D12C4DB.9060003@speakeasy.net> Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 19:41:15 -0800 From: "Jason C. Wells" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100808 Lightning/1.0b1 Thunderbird/3.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC" References: <4D12BA51.2010602@speakeasy.net> <09452D14-1133-4282-ACF3-648D6607644A@shire.net> In-Reply-To: <09452D14-1133-4282-ACF3-648D6607644A@shire.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd general questions Subject: Re: Nullfs Allows Jailbreaking X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 03:41:17 -0000 On 12/22/10 19:00, Chad Leigh -- Shire.Net LLC wrote: > I have been doing this for years with great success. I don't understand your question. How does it look like everything is read only from inside the jail? The fact that a "df" only shows the root filesystem and not all your others file systems? (assuming that is still the truth -- my jails do this on older FBSD systems Your report of great success is encouraging. I've never done this and sometimes you don't see the full consequences when you haven't done something before. I think you understand my question. It's the fact that mount(8) report read only. If you looked at that, you would conclude that you had no write access at all. Well, I set up the jail, so I can see behind the curtain. A downstream user that never saw behind the curtain wouldn't know where they could write a file unless they simply guessed. That is why I asked about jailbreaking. There is information crossing the jail in a mysterious way. The jail reports that everything under root is read only, but the jail can still see the read-writeness of the invisible (to mount) null filesystems. From the sound of it, this is expected behavior. Regards, Jason C. Wells From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 23 07:48:36 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15334106564A for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 07:48:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from mail.gelita.se (212-162-182-244.skbbip.com [212.162.182.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C47EC8FC13 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 07:48:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.gelita.se (localhost.gelita.se [127.0.0.1]) by mail.gelita.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E7E410E827 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 08:33:48 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at troback.com Received: from mail.gelita.se ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.gelita.se (mail.gelita.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uNYj-zpQz+Ey for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 08:33:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from bljbsd01.no-ip.org (c-195-216-040-164.static.bjare.net [195.216.40.164]) by mail.gelita.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8485610E77C for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 08:33:42 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4D12FAFC.5040705@eskk.nu> Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 08:32:12 +0100 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; sv-SE; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101212 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Laptop with external monitor, how to make it work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 07:48:36 -0000 I'm looking for a description on how to make the switching between monitors work. In my case it's the key combination Fn + F8 on a Dell Latitude E6500. Any help appreciated :-) Thanks /Leslie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 23 08:11:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41E36106566B for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 08:11:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C55098FC17 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 08:11:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm16 with SMTP id 16so6488890fxm.13 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 00:11:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=/EpA7pEs3ej9mDINRM59BNgAAdZCjCWh/WjtZ9l0l4w=; b=DXFwLnzbGNFuXtyH1um7TmGNPx+nxqZGlPbGOxoMaOvTPD7pkGuyIiWX6MXuh9fd2I pZK71ha65wgLv3UhgOwm6zL+cWYaMCp2R3aIVCEiXz42pW1roDkToYrIblE+8cxEOoHm iym/+saAoBf5n3F+J7rZkiLwJNYzM0zqtOpak= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=Bobj1ffL99na9r5pn30KQZfjigXrWAw0aH4aC2jZsdzRjAwaFhGZ1TaWCvkqNhAvkz RFrhPmZxsuTck9BvsX+RHC2aUPmZtso3fezRpXbB/E0JS0RRyBiRy2Q2AMVuRe9Uid88 /LsnkvmqUGO/9493RXme/+ckErhJezDnZ1Hb4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.223.124.9 with SMTP id s9mr1456581far.13.1293091860730; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 00:11:00 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.223.114.4 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 00:11:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D12FAFC.5040705@eskk.nu> References: <4D12FAFC.5040705@eskk.nu> Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 02:11:00 -0600 Message-ID: From: Adam Vande More To: Leslie Jensen Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Laptop with external monitor, how to make it work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 08:11:02 -0000 On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 1:32 AM, Leslie Jensen wrote: > > I'm looking for a description on how to make the switching between monitors > work. In my case it's the key combination Fn + F8 on a Dell Latitude E6500. > > Any help appreciated :-) > On my dell laptop, the monitor must be connected when X is started for the function key toggle to work. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 23 08:27:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41097106564A for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 08:27:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEE5C8FC12 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 08:27:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.193]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id A36705C21 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:31:53 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4D130702.5010200@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:23:30 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101119 Thunderbird/3.0.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: AMD Athlon64 Mainboard - NOT SPAM: please check it out :) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 08:27:02 -0000 I know its a little OT, but I'm hunting for a mainboard to plug this CPU into and build a file server. So the ideal specs are (and maybe dreaming too :) ): 184 pin RAM DIMM SataIII 4+ ports Either onboard or AGP Video 2x Gigabit LAN Obviously I don't need much RAM, just juice the throughput from the HDD to the LAN, and plenty of bandwidth. That said a lot of my specs could be pipe dreaming, I know. I'm looking at 3x 2Tb Seagate 64Mb SATAIII's so I'd rather not waste it, I'm sure you'd agree. I'll be setting up RAID5 in some fashion or other, just still choosing my method between ZFS and VINUM or something. So the need for as many SATA ports is a must :) Any help finding a suitable model would be much appreciated- very hard to find anything still in stock. And of course advice will be very welcome :) Cheers From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 23 08:27:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 024481065670 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 08:27:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B051F8FC19 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 08:27:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.193]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B9A25C44 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:32:16 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4D130719.5090203@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:23:53 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101119 Thunderbird/3.0.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: AMD Athlon64 Mainboard - NOT SPAM: please check it out :) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 08:27:25 -0000 I know its a little OT, but I'm hunting for a mainboard to plug this CPU into and build a file server. So the ideal specs are (and maybe dreaming too :) ): 184 pin RAM DIMM SataIII 4+ ports Either onboard or AGP Video 2x Gigabit LAN Obviously I don't need much RAM, just juice the throughput from the HDD to the LAN, and plenty of bandwidth. That said a lot of my specs could be pipe dreaming, I know. I'm looking at 3x 2Tb Seagate 64Mb SATAIII's so I'd rather not waste it, I'm sure you'd agree. I'll be setting up RAID5 in some fashion or other, just still choosing my method between ZFS and VINUM or something. So the need for as many SATA ports is a must :) Any help finding a suitable model would be much appreciated- very hard to find anything still in stock. And of course advice will be very welcome :) Cheers From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 23 08:30:59 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE37E106566B for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 08:30:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leslie@eskk.nu) Received: from mail.gelita.se (212-162-182-244.skbbip.com [212.162.182.244]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA1CE8FC08 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 08:30:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.gelita.se (localhost.gelita.se [127.0.0.1]) by mail.gelita.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADF6D10E827; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:32:31 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at troback.com Received: from mail.gelita.se ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.gelita.se (mail.gelita.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 976757df1Mye; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:32:25 +0100 (CET) Received: from bljbsd01.no-ip.org (c-195-216-040-164.static.bjare.net [195.216.40.164]) by mail.gelita.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EAC310E79E; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:32:25 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4D1308BF.2070506@eskk.nu> Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:30:55 +0100 From: Leslie Jensen User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; sv-SE; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101212 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Vande More References: <4D12FAFC.5040705@eskk.nu> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Laptop with external monitor, how to make it work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 08:31:00 -0000 On 2010-12-23 09:11, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 1:32 AM, Leslie Jensen wrote: > >> >> I'm looking for a description on how to make the switching between monitors >> work. In my case it's the key combination Fn + F8 on a Dell Latitude E6500. >> >> Any help appreciated :-) >> > > On my dell laptop, the monitor must be connected when X is started for the > function key toggle to work. > > You're right! I'm on a KVM switch and I booted the laptop while working with another PC. Thanks :-) /Leslie PS: Is it a lot of work to get the key combination to work? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 23 11:08:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A7D0106564A for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 11:08:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 123488FC15 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 11:08:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.erewhon.net (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oBNB80Cr046424; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:08:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.erewhon.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9ABA2BAC3; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:07:59 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:07:59 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: Leslie Jensen Message-ID: <20101223110759.GA13934@slackbox.erewhon.net> References: <4D12FAFC.5040705@eskk.nu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D12FAFC.5040705@eskk.nu> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Laptop with external monitor, how to make it work X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 11:08:10 -0000 --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 08:32:12AM +0100, Leslie Jensen wrote: >=20 > I'm looking for a description on how to make the switching between=20 > monitors work. In my case it's the key combination Fn + F8 on a Dell=20 > Latitude E6500. Try xrandr(1) instead. That should work even if you're not booting with the external monitor connected I've used the following to get my laptop desktop (1366x768) to show up on a beamer which has a lower resolution (1024x768). xrandr --output VGA-0 --same-as LVDS --scale 1.33x1 --verbose Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk0TLY8ACgkQEnfvsMMhpyXvrwCeIvJWINBrLYm91tokdu1SNg82 pw4AoJzcudxaM1wYA0R8J4FROrxyRfeB =Ydg2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sm4nu43k4a2Rpi4c-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 23 11:37:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA1C4106564A for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 11:37:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 753DC8FC1B for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 11:37:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so301383bwz.13 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 03:37:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:reply-to :in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type; bh=PuM/TSZzvolsFQv0ZBGkVzkwX+SBeostWgd4VsuG4dA=; b=QPI1Riu2cgbwFoC83u6I+PtvTmxF5w/z5KHRLl6a+YPlHCJ0DFih1nmFNk1iLmSYN8 aXYiyru/FtYGELSKznlFTmLQBwUbIr0bKe5BGzEfclrACgzhf1YkGPisUZsk9ilA1wxc 9ykHf/J/ci8Uj+PxcvPOpVeX3/7+ORfHVzT+8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; b=QR9dpiqszW3V4v0CZEzM7+NjHP54rPdvey3lZ0nbH4UV9pvka5zyfvgAONhyOZXtQ1 2u8BNUZdLHkT3ViTyiWNBgtD1XWm53rsNfB7ExokFP3tQDcFVkxjj0lQvlOhhJtd702s BkT4jcFFYb8QcCrhoyJSmaHUTKLUVOnJDrojc= Received: by 10.204.113.65 with SMTP id z1mr7012345bkp.58.1293104233138; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 03:37:13 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.52.19 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 03:36:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D130719.5090203@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <4D130719.5090203@herveybayaustralia.com.au> From: Chris Rees Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 11:36:42 +0000 Message-ID: To: Da Rock Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD Athlon64 Mainboard - NOT SPAM: please check it out :) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: utisoft@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 11:37:15 -0000 On 23 December 2010 08:23, Da Rock wrote: > I know its a little OT, but I'm hunting for a mainboard to plug this CPU > into and build a file server. So the ideal specs are (and maybe dreaming too > :) ): > > 184 pin RAM DIMM > SataIII 4+ ports > Either onboard or AGP Video > 2x Gigabit LAN > > Obviously I don't need much RAM, just juice the throughput from the HDD to > the LAN, and plenty of bandwidth. That said a lot of my specs could be pipe > dreaming, I know. I'm looking at 3x 2Tb Seagate 64Mb SATAIII's so I'd rather > not waste it, I'm sure you'd agree. > > I'll be setting up RAID5 in some fashion or other, just still choosing my > method between ZFS and VINUM or something. So the need for as many SATA > ports is a must :) > > Any help finding a suitable model would be much appreciated- very hard to > find anything still in stock. And of course advice will be very welcome :) > > Cheers http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ASUS-K8N-AMD-Socket-754-AGP-SATA-nForce3-250-MB-EMS-/220703726350?pt=AU_Components&hash=item3362f79b0e#ht_5060wt_1138 I just searched for 754 SATA on ebay.com.au You _are_ dreaming about the 4x SATA though IMO; I'd just get an expansion card. Or get a cheap bundle with new MB/CPU; it's not always worth salvaging an old CPU like that. Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 23 11:47:32 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AB8E106564A for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 11:47:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D24898FC16 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 11:47:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.193]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 807DE5C21 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 21:52:23 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4D133600.4010002@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 21:44:00 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101119 Thunderbird/3.0.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4D130719.5090203@herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: AMD Athlon64 Mainboard - NOT SPAM: please check it out :) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 11:47:32 -0000 On 12/23/10 21:36, Chris Rees wrote: > On 23 December 2010 08:23, Da Rock > wrote: > >> I know its a little OT, but I'm hunting for a mainboard to plug this CPU >> into and build a file server. So the ideal specs are (and maybe dreaming too >> :) ): >> >> 184 pin RAM DIMM >> SataIII 4+ ports >> Either onboard or AGP Video >> 2x Gigabit LAN >> >> Obviously I don't need much RAM, just juice the throughput from the HDD to >> the LAN, and plenty of bandwidth. That said a lot of my specs could be pipe >> dreaming, I know. I'm looking at 3x 2Tb Seagate 64Mb SATAIII's so I'd rather >> not waste it, I'm sure you'd agree. >> >> I'll be setting up RAID5 in some fashion or other, just still choosing my >> method between ZFS and VINUM or something. So the need for as many SATA >> ports is a must :) >> >> Any help finding a suitable model would be much appreciated- very hard to >> find anything still in stock. And of course advice will be very welcome :) >> >> Cheers >> > http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ASUS-K8N-AMD-Socket-754-AGP-SATA-nForce3-250-MB-EMS-/220703726350?pt=AU_Components&hash=item3362f79b0e#ht_5060wt_1138 > > I just searched for 754 SATA on ebay.com.au > > You _are_ dreaming about the 4x SATA though IMO; I'd just get an expansion card. > > Or get a cheap bundle with new MB/CPU; it's not always worth salvaging > an old CPU like that. > > Chris > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Thanks, but Athlon64 is a 939. Yeah, it may not be worth salvaging, but I thought the cost might be less... I'm more than likely wrong. Worth putting feelers out, though :) Cheers From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 23 12:38:07 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 900641065672 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:38:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from techprosup@gmail.com) Received: from mail-iy0-f182.google.com (mail-iy0-f182.google.com [209.85.210.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A75C8FC0C for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:38:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iyb26 with SMTP id 26so5160066iyb.13 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 04:38:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=0m15Svprie4rPzEUoQx2z9Qg5vkyzRhCsUH1WUylkeo=; b=kD2H9aSVHl1WeV+F3fGFLueuLf2dRaYInucCW+SBSaxX1FRTCkyf+gLkRrFu/4I+nc SaZLrjEMjM21vePx3gMX10kekg66m9S/IJHtIfAOrjxiT4WgIQHQgpC9ERw/gpUivVLj Ps+83VLl9pO3AEHDYAhpejbHNtbfMr6xID980= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=IGu4AL0/Q0jLxO0qjD0+SdwaTAcg5wc+l6mT99iiSHpQ0ENFfBWo6ayPILBXQLYyIb gJdkshyk3eFIddXxDiI35fLYbD3wn8NziSTgYn0PAVV33Ad6gnTHtVKBOP7+KaySZ/UA 8g8UhCMozJ9N49+zWzV/u7iKsQpMgjlcuayl4= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.34.65 with SMTP id k1mr8120096ibd.9.1293105991743; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 04:06:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.173.208 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 04:06:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 10:06:31 -0200 Message-ID: From: itpr0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Completely remove user from system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:38:07 -0000 Hi list, We are using postfix with system user authentication, I have to completely remove an user for the system so he couldn't auth to send e-mails. Some coworkers told to just remove the lines from /etc/passwd and /etc/master.passwd... I did that but the user still can authenticate. using "pw user show XXX" returns that still have a register from the user XXX but trying the "pw user del XXX" it says there is no such user.. I tried rmuser and here is the return: # rmuser XXX Matching password entry: XXX:*:20887:1014::0:0:XXXXX XXXXX:/home/XXX:/nonexistent Is this the entry you wish to remove? y Remove user's home directory (/home/XXXX)? y Removing user (XXX): home passwdpw: user 'XXX' does not exist: No such file or directory There is any other thing that I can do to completely remove this user? It's urgent 'cos it's sending a lot of spam mails :( and our server administrator is on vacation :/ Thank you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 23 12:50:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A84D4106564A for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:50:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.26]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 285B08FC12 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:50:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.erewhon.net (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr6.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oBNCoOJw005532; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:50:24 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.erewhon.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 628C4BAC3; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:50:24 +0100 (CET) Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:50:24 +0100 From: Roland Smith To: itpr0 Message-ID: <20101223125024.GA6231@slackbox.erewhon.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Completely remove user from system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:50:26 -0000 --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:06:31AM -0200, itpr0 wrote: > Hi list, >=20 > We are using postfix with system user authentication, I have to completely > remove an user for the system so he couldn't auth to send e-mails. >=20 > Some coworkers told to just remove the lines from /etc/passwd and > /etc/master.passwd... I did that but the user still can authenticate. >=20 > using "pw user show XXX" returns that still have a register from the user > XXX but trying the "pw user del XXX" it says there is no such user.. >=20 > I tried rmuser and here is the return: >=20 > # rmuser XXX > Matching password entry: >=20 > XXX:*:20887:1014::0:0:XXXXX XXXXX:/home/XXX:/nonexistent >=20 > Is this the entry you wish to remove? y > Remove user's home directory (/home/XXXX)? y > Removing user (XXX): home passwdpw: user 'XXX' does not exist: No such fi= le > or directory >=20 > There is any other thing that I can do to completely remove this user? It= 's > urgent 'cos it's sending a lot of spam mails :( and our server administra= tor > is on vacation :/ > Thank you. After modifying /etc/master.passwd, you need to run pwd_mkdb(8): pwd_mkdb /etc/master.passwd Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.16 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk0TRZAACgkQEnfvsMMhpyXIhgCcDEoHRIsbPJspkIYALoVBvaZt mbsAn3aM71vGx3FS7z3U2zERK0srAwWb =/0lp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --y0ulUmNC+osPPQO6-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 23 12:56:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85A6B106564A for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:56:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from igorr@canmos.ru) Received: from sta1.canmos.ru (sta1.canmos.ru [89.107.124.11]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41DC88FC15 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:56:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sta1.canmos.ru (sta1.canmos.ru [89.107.124.11]) by sta1.canmos.ru (Postfix) with ESMTP id 879C81273C6; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:56:00 +0300 (MSK) Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:55:58 +0300 (MSK) From: "Igor V. Ruzanov" To: itpr0 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: X-GPG-PUBLIC-KEY: 1024D/494AF6DC 2008-03-20 Igor V. Ruzanov X-GPG-FINGERPRINT: A723 B6CC 11ED A4E2 1909 C4DC 6EDE 9089 494A F6DC MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Completely remove user from system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:56:02 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Thu, 23 Dec 2010, itpr0 wrote: |Hi list, | |We are using postfix with system user authentication, I have to completely |remove an user for the system so he couldn't auth to send e-mails. | |Some coworkers told to just remove the lines from /etc/passwd and |/etc/master.passwd... I did that but the user still can authenticate. | |using "pw user show XXX" returns that still have a register from the user |XXX but trying the "pw user del XXX" it says there is no such user.. | |I tried rmuser and here is the return: | |# rmuser XXX |Matching password entry: | |XXX:*:20887:1014::0:0:XXXXX XXXXX:/home/XXX:/nonexistent | |Is this the entry you wish to remove? y |Remove user's home directory (/home/XXXX)? y |Removing user (XXX): home passwdpw: user 'XXX' does not exist: No such file |or directory | One of simpliest ways to remove user is the `vipw' command. vipw opens master.passwd file in vi editor. After removing nesessary string vipw rebuild user's database. After that your can just remove user's home directory and even say locate.updatedb if you don't want to see removed user via `locate' :) +-------------------------------------------+ ! CANMOS ISP Network ! +-------------------------------------------+ ! Best regards ! ! Igor V. Ruzanov, network operational staff! ! e-Mail: igorr@canmos.ru ! +-------------------------------------------+ -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://quantumlab.net/pine_privacy_guard/ iD8DBQFNE0bgbt6QiUlK9twRAjFEAJ9MHSy2UmmoGjSYyvgebD/eZqaqpACfWECI cCXL5qFCI4CWMb/+kJGK+JU= =Pp4z -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 23 13:16:33 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9ECB106564A for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:16:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45A078FC19 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:16:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so367768bwz.13 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 05:16:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:reply-to :in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type; bh=ndookuviQiFx7MQ7bi72Y0EHKKTr6fK4GKuu1eO6yQY=; b=GIMbYjw+2I2uzvn2OylZiDXH5cCzhvelPMZArpcu5D66fapZxeZC9O7SpVC+tgECNK gkjDMYd1uXs0NibzQ1cHI6IzagcN75c/5nmwkAXzF5OQtvAajO3Jxy58Kce4BU9OuzG2 YJ6J7zc0DKISp2AzZRdx+/cKnPd0qpPbtcXKc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; b=bzWtP5c6oTC8httApfJg0I2CDLDTT+60ERZ+gErllMg2nVKzvwGcKYwnS9ubYO+ekd Nbee98QTgiBuG3e0Fmcb7szIk5wAQVkpcveOhU57XtTimzS6AWc5Cx+kctqQULYn6jvk pNZrJVdjEmD6rYJ3h3PVy3UTErVOy6G0AyqO4= Received: by 10.204.46.134 with SMTP id j6mr7098920bkf.112.1293110192222; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 05:16:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.52.19 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 05:16:02 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D133600.4010002@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <4D130719.5090203@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4D133600.4010002@herveybayaustralia.com.au> From: Chris Rees Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:16:02 +0000 Message-ID: To: Da Rock Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD Athlon64 Mainboard - NOT SPAM: please check it out :) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: utisoft@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:16:33 -0000 On 23 December 2010 11:44, Da Rock wrote: > > Thanks, but Athlon64 is a 939. Yeah, it may not be worth salvaging, but I > thought the cost might be less... I'm more than likely wrong. Worth putting > feelers out, though :) > Athlon64s can be 754, 939 or AM2. Perhaps you meant *your* Athlon64 is a 939? Sorry you're not having much luck. If I knew the Aussie market I'd help you to pick something comparable, but that's better left to someone more local for you! Hope you get some results soon. Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 23 13:45:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42AB51065672 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:45:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@g8kbv.demon.co.uk) Received: from anchor-post-1.mail.demon.net (anchor-post-1.mail.demon.net [195.173.77.132]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A8428FC18 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:45:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [212.225.127.64] (helo=[192.168.33.1]) by anchor-post-1.mail.demon.net with esmtpa (AUTH g8kbv) (Exim 4.69) id 1PVlTw-0003uT-iN for freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:45:24 +0000 From: "Dave" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:45:24 -0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <4D135274.2305.270BB415@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk> Priority: normal In-reply-to: References: <4D11DA76.32672.214EF771@dave.g8kbv.demon.co.uk>, <20101222130711.00006546@unknown>, X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Windows (4.52) Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-description: Mail message body Cc: Subject: Re: Well, I broke it! FreeBSD V8.1 release X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:45:26 -0000 On 22 Dec 2010 at 9:49, Chris Brennan wrote: > IIRC ';' isn't a valid bash comment ... (which has been previously > discussed elsewhere). It's usually safer to use '#' for comment in > /etc/rc.conf and other system config files as they typically use BASH > style structs. > Accepted and acknowledged as my finger trouble. As earlier, that issue is now fixed. Thanks. Dave B. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 23 13:46:18 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5201C106566B for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:46:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BB7A8FC1A for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:46:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.37]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 23 Dec 2010 08:46:16 -0500 Received: from mx04.lnh.mail.rcn.net (mx04.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.54]) by mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 4.1.9-GA) with ESMTP id AQN53341; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 08:45:18 -0500 Received: from 209-6-91-204.c3-0.smr-ubr1.sbo-smr.ma.cable.rcn.com (HELO jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) ([209.6.91.204]) by smtp04.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 23 Dec 2010 08:45:18 -0500 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <19731.21102.840546.339239@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 08:45:18 -0500 To: "Igor V. Ruzanov" In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" XEmacs Lucid X-Junkmail-Whitelist: YES (by domain whitelist at mr17.lnh.mail.rcn.net) Cc: itpr0 , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Completely remove user from system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:46:18 -0000 Igor V. Ruzanov writes: > One of simpliest ways to remove user is the `vipw' command. vipw > opens master.passwd file in vi editor. Though it's called "vipw", it will try to use any program pointed to by the EDITOR environment variable. Respectfully, Robert "setenv EDITOR xemacs" Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 23 14:00:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3ABD8106564A for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:00:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from arab@tangerine-army.co.uk) Received: from smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk (smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk [195.188.213.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6B448FC14 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:00:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [172.23.170.141] (helo=anti-virus02-08) by smtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk with smtp (Exim 4.52) id 1PVliB-0007I0-AO; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:00:09 +0000 Received: from [94.168.170.153] (helo=Mercury.galaxy.lan.lcl) by asmtp-out3.blueyonder.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PVXPQ-0002iT-Tl; Wed, 22 Dec 2010 22:43:48 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2010 22:43:48 -0000 Content-class: urn:content-classes:message Message-ID: <01FB8F39BAD0BD49A6D0DA8F7897392904F800@Mercury.galaxy.lan.lcl> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5 In-Reply-To: <201012222146.17757.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: Which network driver for RTL8211 or 8201 NIC's? Thread-Index: AcuiJd4cvyjd5/CCSdGU4gfUG9jHzgAA6Ibg References: <201012222146.17757.jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk> From: "Graeme Dargie" To: "Mike Clarke" , Cc: Subject: RE: Which network driver for RTL8211 or 8201 NIC's? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:00:25 -0000 -----Original Message----- From: Mike Clarke [mailto:jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk]=20 Sent: 22 December 2010 21:46 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Which network driver for RTL8211 or 8201 NIC's? I need to replace a failing motherboard. I'm aiming to keep the existing Athlon CPU so I'm tied down to to a socket AM2(+) board and the=20 majority of those available seem to have nForce 630a chipsets and=20 RTL8211CL or 8201EL NIC's which aren't explicitly mentioned in the=20 release notes=20 . I see=20 that the strings RTL8211C(L) and RTL8201L (but not EL) appear=20 in /usr/src/sys/dev/rgephy.c and rlphy.c but the man page for the rl=20 driver only mentions RealTek 8129/8139 and I'm not sure which driver is=20 built from rgephy.c. Am I going to have problems if I get a motherboard with one of these=20 NIC's? --=20 Mike Clarke _______________________________________________ freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" I have an am2+ board in a machine with a realtek card and it is using the re driver, might be worth having a look there. Regards Graeme=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 23 14:01:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C44091065672 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:01:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7857D8FC0A for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:01:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.193]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB7185C21 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 00:06:05 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4D135558.4000101@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 23:57:44 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101119 Thunderbird/3.0.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4D130719.5090203@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4D133600.4010002@herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: AMD Athlon64 Mainboard - NOT SPAM: please check it out :) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:01:14 -0000 On 12/23/10 23:16, Chris Rees wrote: > On 23 December 2010 11:44, Da Rock > wrote: > > >> Thanks, but Athlon64 is a 939. Yeah, it may not be worth salvaging, but I >> thought the cost might be less... I'm more than likely wrong. Worth putting >> feelers out, though :) >> >> > Athlon64s can be 754, 939 or AM2. Perhaps you meant *your* Athlon64 is a 939? > > Sorry you're not having much luck. > > If I knew the Aussie market I'd help you to pick something comparable, > but that's better left to someone more local for you! > > Hope you get some results soon. > > > Well thats from memory, and it is pretty old now I agree. Might have been a local thing then. As I remember it only the Athlon and then Semperon's were 754. The 64's and FX's were 939. The later Athlons were AM2, but that was just after I got this one, and they're the X2's I believe. But again, that may have been local. I've got wholesale contacts, but I was hoping to make use of this spare chip and RAM floating about. Diff would be around $100, so only kinda worth it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 23 15:35:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CFDD1065674 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:35:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cwhiteh@onetel.com) Received: from april.london.02.net (april.london.02.net [87.194.255.143]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D29B18FC17 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:35:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muji2.config (93.97.24.219) by april.london.02.net (8.5.124.10) id 4D10D88E000A9E44 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:25:20 +0000 Message-ID: <4D1369E2.6090403@onetel.com> Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:25:22 +0000 From: Chris Whitehouse User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100924 Thunderbird/3.1.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <4D130719.5090203@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4D133600.4010002@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4D135558.4000101@herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-Reply-To: <4D135558.4000101@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: AMD Athlon64 Mainboard - NOT SPAM: please check it out :) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:35:56 -0000 On 12/23/10 13:57, Da Rock wrote: > I've got wholesale contacts, but I was hoping to make use of this spare > chip and RAM floating about. Diff would be around $100, so only kinda > worth it. > It might be worth looking at Intel Atom processor boards or similar, there are plenty of very low power boards around now. If you can find something that suits you will recoup the cost of the new processor and RAM with much reduced electricity consumption, I believe around 10 times less. There's been a few threads recently about low power boards. eg this thread http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/getmsg.cgi?fetch=411819+0+/usr/local/www/db/text/2010/freebsd-questions/20101128.freebsd-questions suggests this board http://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/ATOM/ICH9/X7SPE.cfm?typ=H&IPMI=Y which looks like it covers what you want. Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 23 15:44:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83CE21065673 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:44:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bw0-f54.google.com (mail-bw0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09A3A8FC17 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:44:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz12 with SMTP id 12so485922bwz.13 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 07:44:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:reply-to :in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8LQGvzKgZ0t7TpdbAt6r5GmlDnlRdRrxYlj+tdPLkSY=; b=MKq5eJ7mxHUHc1Q3C7mW9gjkebUZz7aea6yePH3/XQd8+RyJNNiHYwHHx5v+ucfGcL XF9vZNtyZuQY6KnGKbNPs9ZQ4iezgAN5ItWYJg8Dy5tCAZi3Fih2066zPkCiHLWjAPhv xBQ9dZr1363Q1ZHJ1Y2KBKTczZwk/bGKXCMyk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=iGxXqzrtGCxmPEF2Qqr1a17PflaQcnf9PGG6XOWGSEf/UmNqxXKGSWVMj3yg+481nF nz7O41vILiyC963K/gfLW1TKCQMyzZkARTfFGMQ29/TI+3RnBWF0DwXWlJi6D4Y+Q1rn LaY7pE5+1ZaKJgI0WMKMjT5DnApKe0WrEuvW0= Received: by 10.204.70.130 with SMTP id d2mr7243980bkj.166.1293119086703; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 07:44:46 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.52.19 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 07:44:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D135558.4000101@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <4D130719.5090203@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4D133600.4010002@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4D135558.4000101@herveybayaustralia.com.au> From: Chris Rees Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:44:16 +0000 Message-ID: To: Da Rock Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD Athlon64 Mainboard - NOT SPAM: please check it out :) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: utisoft@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:44:48 -0000 On 23 December 2010 13:57, Da Rock wrote: > On 12/23/10 23:16, Chris Rees wrote: >> >> On 23 December 2010 11:44, Da Rock >> =A0wrote: >> >> >>> >>> Thanks, but Athlon64 is a 939. Yeah, it may not be worth salvaging, but= I >>> thought the cost might be less... I'm more than likely wrong. Worth >>> putting >>> feelers out, though :) >>> >>> >> >> Athlon64s can be 754, 939 or AM2. Perhaps you meant *your* Athlon64 is a >> 939? >> >> Sorry you're not having much luck. >> >> If I knew the Aussie market I'd help you to pick something comparable, >> but that's better left to someone more local for you! >> >> Hope you get some results soon. >> >> >> > > Well thats from memory, and it is pretty old now I agree. Might have been= a > local thing then. As I remember it only the Athlon and then Semperon's we= re > 754. The 64's and FX's were 939. The later Athlons were AM2, but that was > just after I got this one, and they're the X2's I believe. But again, tha= t > may have been local. I think you're thinking of Socket 462. This might clear it up a little: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athlon64 Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 23 16:39:23 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DF84106564A for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 16:39:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from tower.berklix.org (tower.berklix.org [83.236.223.114]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9B7E8FC0C for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 16:39:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from park.js.berklix.net (p5B22D543.dip.t-dialin.net [91.34.213.67]) (authenticated bits=0) by tower.berklix.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id oBNGdIlt065974; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 16:39:19 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by park.js.berklix.net (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id oBNGeieq077843; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:40:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oBNGeYYo041903; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:40:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201012231640.oBNGeYYo041903@fire.js.berklix.net> To: itpr0 From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://www.berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://www.berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Thu, 23 Dec 2010 10:06:31 -0200." Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:40:34 +0100 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Completely remove user from system X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 16:39:23 -0000 > There is any other thing that I can do to completely remove this user? It's > urgent 'cos it's sending a lot of spam mails :( and our server administrator > is on vacation :/ > Thank you. In addition to what others wrote, in cases spam is not direct from your host, but perhaps relaying (now or later) via your host, check with this: echo /usr/local/*bin/*sasl* If there is no sasl installed, dont worry thats fine, dont install it just to check, just exit, else :-) man sasldblistusers # you might have sasl2 instead of sasl su /usr/local/sbin/sasldblistusers # If your rogue user is in list man saslpasswd Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultants Munich http://berklix.com Mail plain text; Not quoted-printable, or HTML or base 64. Avoid top posting, it cripples itemised cumulative responses. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 23 17:30:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65E5B106564A for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:30:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from traveling08@cox.net) Received: from fed1rmmtao104.cox.net (fed1rmmtao104.cox.net [68.230.241.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F0FA8FC1C for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:30:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao106.cox.net (InterMail vM.8.01.03.00 201-2260-125-20100507) with ESMTP id <20101223171925.BDBD4722.fed1rmmtao106.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:19:25 -0500 Received: from bsd64 ([72.220.91.159]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id mhKR1f0013SHlyY03hKRQ2; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 12:19:25 -0500 X-VR-Score: 9.00 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=J2GWeI4Qc7l9Lgg4ilgNirYBab5JXgIjgVIUaayc/Ns= c=1 sm=1 a=poZL04BZy3cA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=qynEz7/CHAl9D2/jKbf6gQ==:17 a=ZaDg5-L3AAAA:8 a=6FVboaCCAAAA:8 a=nvVh5fvfLgyUCweOs44A:9 a=hTElGMPyZAtEl0RVCHUA:7 a=VdiA3vRSZW7ghpJUGUgCi5oCoygA:4 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=qynEz7/CHAl9D2/jKbf6gQ==:117 X-CM-Score: 0.00 Authentication-Results: cox.net; none Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 09:19:19 -0800 From: Robert To: Da Rock Message-ID: <20101223091919.687361dc@bsd64> In-Reply-To: <4D130702.5010200@herveybayaustralia.com.au> References: <4D130702.5010200@herveybayaustralia.com.au> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD Athlon64 Mainboard - NOT SPAM: please check it out :) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 17:30:01 -0000 On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:23:30 +1000 Da Rock wrote: > I know its a little OT, but I'm hunting for a mainboard to plug this > CPU into and build a file server. So the ideal specs are (and maybe > dreaming too :) ): > > 184 pin RAM DIMM > SataIII 4+ ports > Either onboard or AGP Video > 2x Gigabit LAN > > Obviously I don't need much RAM, just juice the throughput from the > HDD to the LAN, and plenty of bandwidth. That said a lot of my specs > could be pipe dreaming, I know. I'm looking at 3x 2Tb Seagate 64Mb > SATAIII's so I'd rather not waste it, I'm sure you'd agree. > > I'll be setting up RAID5 in some fashion or other, just still > choosing my method between ZFS and VINUM or something. So the need > for as many SATA ports is a must :) > > Any help finding a suitable model would be much appreciated- very > hard to find anything still in stock. And of course advice will be > very welcome :) I just did a quick search on ebay australia for "socket 939 motherboard" and hit this http://shop.ebay.com.au/?_from=R40&_trksid=m570&_nkw=socket+939+motherboard&_sacat=See-All-Categories One of my computers is a Asus A8N-VM 939. It has 2 ports for SATA and I added another SATA card into the PCI-E x1 slot. I found an AMD64x2 CPU on ebay that was reasonable nad have 4G of RAM. This is not the latest or greatest but it is still a very functional computer. I hope this helps. Robert P.S. I will be taking my first trip to AU in February and am quite excited about it. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 23 18:10:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80679106566B for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:10:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (relay2.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D09708FC19 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:10:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.93.1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (account sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.125.240] verified) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.13) with ESMTPSA id 15188826 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 23:10:35 +0600 Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oBNHAYYY008432 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 23:10:34 +0600 (OMST) (envelope-from sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id oBNHAYNb008431 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 23:10:34 +0600 (OMST) (envelope-from sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru using -f Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 23:10:34 +0600 From: Victor Sudakov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101223171034.GA8330@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Victor Sudakov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Organization: AO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.livejournal.com/pubkey.bml?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 Subject: rc.d and environment variables X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:10:39 -0000 Colleagues, The svnserve daemon is started from /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve. I need to pass the environment variable KRB5_KTNAME=/home/svn/svn.keytab to the daemon on start. How do I do that? I tried to do this via a login class for the svn user, but it did not work. If I first 'su -l svn' and then start the daemon manually, the environment variable is set all right, but not when it is started from /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve. All this is happening on 8.1-RELEASE-p2. Thanks in advance for any help. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 23 18:27:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31031106566B for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:27:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (relay2.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84C148FC1A for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:27:56 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.93.1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (account sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.125.240] verified) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.13) with ESMTPSA id 15188987 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 23:27:53 +0600 Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oBNHRqcj008614 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 23:27:52 +0600 (OMST) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id oBNHRqu3008613 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 23:27:52 +0600 (OMST) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 23:27:52 +0600 From: Victor Sudakov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101223172752.GA8539@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Victor Sudakov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Organization: AO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.livejournal.com/pubkey.bml?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 Subject: rc.d and environment variables X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:27:57 -0000 Colleagues, The svnserve daemon is started from /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve. I need to pass the environment variable KRB5_KTNAME=/home/svn/svn.keytab to the daemon on start. How do I do that? I tried to do this via a login class for the svn user, but it did not work. If I first 'su -l svn' and then start the daemon manually, the environment variable is set all right, but not when it is started from /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve. All this is happening on 8.1-RELEASE-p2. Thanks in advance for any help. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 23 18:56:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5776F106566C for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:56:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hedayati.mo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E696C8FC08 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:56:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so6312802wyf.13 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 10:56:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=UR9rJu8LyhE+C46DmZESqcJR7rzyZVn37oM6rKkJv0A=; b=al4vTKzxk/j/F8wG27+T0Qvp4xXthgJK1PgERF3mgfUO/0HC/laWYyqkzxNc/UEmcT K5/VzrmC4Kc3trG1lsgTZri0slB4Ttt8UDr6xIbCqTDl1GbO+T+gWMMhj3zHINVqYy7v 1cmSctLiZfC2gPloEuk81EAAqIXb95eE27laI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=jt0w5sr9Fi9xY0ndQlqDfm3nK0LsAfDRCuv1O9MJ47efA4ZcCXz6o0lijvUQg4tTan 8qoBIdv9CTJOv/A/Xzrzth+k07NGCdG9PMNyxu/61nDGYsuQFtS/fXxAZHqvpXxGBWlc Bd5IE/jdrvBhtEIuS9u49+IEzP8xEWfH3TqVc= Received: by 10.227.127.75 with SMTP id f11mr5192414wbs.89.1293130571504; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 10:56:11 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.143.202 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 10:55:31 -0800 (PST) From: Mohammad Hedayati Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 22:25:31 +0330 Message-ID: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Inappropriate ioctl for device X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:56:13 -0000 I'm writing a simple char device. So far everything went so good (read/write), but here I'm going to add support for ioctl. int ioctl(struct cdev *dev, u_long cmd, caddr_t data, int flags, struct thread *td) { int error = 0; uprintf("Here...\n"); return(error); } and I'm calling it here: len = ioctl(cd, 0, ""); perror("ioctl"); but when runnig it says: ioctl: Inappropriate ioctl for device where's the problem? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 23 19:12:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F5661065670 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 19:12:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C654C8FC15 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 19:12:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-37-207.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.37.207]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DEE83D87A; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 20:12:50 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id oBNJCnk1001665; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 20:12:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 20:12:49 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Victor Sudakov Message-Id: <20101223201249.ea7648aa.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20101223172752.GA8539@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> References: <20101223172752.GA8539@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc.d and environment variables X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 19:12:53 -0000 On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 23:27:52 +0600, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Colleagues, > > The svnserve daemon is started from /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve. I need to > pass the environment variable KRB5_KTNAME=/home/svn/svn.keytab to the > daemon on start. How do I do that? If the user corresponding to the svnservice has a login shell, which would usually be the system's default dialog shell, the C shell, you could edit /etc/csh.cshrc and put setenv KRB5_KTNAME /home/svn/svn.keytab to make it a system-wide setting (or use the user's ~/.cshrc for a user-only setting). In case the user does NOT have a default shell, I think you should be able to also define a system-wide environmental variable by coding KRB5_KTNAME=/home/svn/svn.keytab; export KRB5_KTNAME into /etc/rc.local (which will be executed at system startup). See "man rc.local" for details. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 23 19:18:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D136106564A for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 19:18:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (gizmo.acns.msu.edu [35.8.1.43]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3C758FC0A for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 19:18:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from gizmo.acns.msu.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id oBNJEhMk024670; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:14:43 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc@gizmo.acns.msu.edu) Received: (from jerrymc@localhost) by gizmo.acns.msu.edu (8.13.6/8.13.6/Submit) id oBNJEh2c024669; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:14:43 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from jerrymc) Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:14:43 -0500 From: Jerry McAllister To: Polytropon Message-ID: <20101223191443.GA24653@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20101223172752.GA8539@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20101223201249.ea7648aa.freebsd@edvax.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101223201249.ea7648aa.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.2i Cc: Victor Sudakov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc.d and environment variables X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 19:18:10 -0000 On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 08:12:49PM +0100, Polytropon wrote: > On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 23:27:52 +0600, Victor Sudakov wrote: > > Colleagues, > > > > The svnserve daemon is started from /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve. I need to > > pass the environment variable KRB5_KTNAME=/home/svn/svn.keytab to the > > daemon on start. How do I do that? > > If the user corresponding to the svnservice has a login > shell, which would usually be the system's default > dialog shell, the C shell, you could edit /etc/csh.cshrc > and put > > setenv KRB5_KTNAME /home/svn/svn.keytab > > to make it a system-wide setting (or use the user's > ~/.cshrc for a user-only setting). > > In case the user does NOT have a default shell, I think > you should be able to also define a system-wide environmental > variable by coding > > KRB5_KTNAME=/home/svn/svn.keytab; export KRB5_KTNAME > > into /etc/rc.local (which will be executed at system startup). > See "man rc.local" for details. > Put it in /etc/rc.conf and have your script read up rc.conf and set any of the stuff in there it is interested in, such as KRB5_KINAME. I think that is the officially sanctioned way of doing such things. ////jerry > > -- > Polytropon > Magdeburg, Germany > Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 > Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 23 19:54:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E3371065673 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 19:54:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E4D58FC1C for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 19:54:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-37-207.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.37.207]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 523083CE32; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 20:54:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id oBNJsuP5001908; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 20:54:56 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 20:54:56 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Jerry McAllister Message-Id: <20101223205456.21ddbe27.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20101223191443.GA24653@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> References: <20101223172752.GA8539@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20101223201249.ea7648aa.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101223191443.GA24653@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Victor Sudakov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc.d and environment variables X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 19:54:58 -0000 On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 14:14:43 -0500, Jerry McAllister wrote: > On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 08:12:49PM +0100, Polytropon wrote: > > > On Thu, 23 Dec 2010 23:27:52 +0600, Victor Sudakov wrote: > > > Colleagues, > > > > > > The svnserve daemon is started from /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve. I need to > > > pass the environment variable KRB5_KTNAME=/home/svn/svn.keytab to the > > > daemon on start. How do I do that? > > > > If the user corresponding to the svnservice has a login > > shell, which would usually be the system's default > > dialog shell, the C shell, you could edit /etc/csh.cshrc > > and put > > > > setenv KRB5_KTNAME /home/svn/svn.keytab > > > > to make it a system-wide setting (or use the user's > > ~/.cshrc for a user-only setting). > > > > In case the user does NOT have a default shell, I think > > you should be able to also define a system-wide environmental > > variable by coding > > > > KRB5_KTNAME=/home/svn/svn.keytab; export KRB5_KTNAME > > > > into /etc/rc.local (which will be executed at system startup). > > See "man rc.local" for details. > > > > Put it in /etc/rc.conf and have your script read up rc.conf and > set any of the stuff in there it is interested in, such as KRB5_KINAME. > > I think that is the officially sanctioned way of doing such things. I'm not sure this will work. The initial question was about how to obtain an environmental variable. If the rc.d script of svnserve sources /etc/rc.conf and/or /etc/rc.conf.local, it is okay, but what if a binary wants to read the variable by the standard way, i. e. int main(int argc, char *argv[], char *envp[]) then there will be no access to files like /etc/rc.conf. This means the variable will have to be a validly set environmental variable that can be output by % env or a similar program (or mechanism). Settings from /etc/rc.conf do NOT show up as environmental variables. Anyway, if svnserve is able to be passed a command string to, a setting like svnserve_flags="... -k /home/svn/svn.keytab ..." coded in /etc/rc.conf or /etc/rc.conf.local would work, and would also be the preferred method for such things. In fact, I've not come across the need to have an environmental variable to store a configuration setting for an additional program, as such kind of variables is mainly for "low level" system use, mostly. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 23 20:12:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A223D106564A for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 20:12:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BD488FC16 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 20:12:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 14477 invoked from network); 23 Dec 2010 20:12:43 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail5.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 23 Dec 2010 20:12:43 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 6F6855082D; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:12:42 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101223172752.GA8539@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20101223201249.ea7648aa.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101223191443.GA24653@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20101223205456.21ddbe27.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 15:12:42 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20101223205456.21ddbe27.freebsd@edvax.de> (Polytropon's message of "Thu, 23 Dec 2010 20:54:56 +0100") Message-ID: <44zkrws0xx.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Subject: Re: rc.d and environment variables X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 20:12:44 -0000 Polytropon writes: > I'm not sure this will work. The initial question was about > how to obtain an environmental variable. If the rc.d script > of svnserve sources /etc/rc.conf and/or /etc/rc.conf.local, > it is okay, They do. rc.d scripts all start by sucking in rc.subr, which in turn pulls in the rc.conf files. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 23 21:51:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0471D1065675 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 21:51:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from merlyn@stonehenge.com) Received: from red.stonehenge.com (red.stonehenge.com [IPv6:2607:f2f8:3080::]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E17A58FC19 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 21:51:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by red.stonehenge.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 5F70D1920; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:51:11 -0800 (PST) From: merlyn@stonehenge.com (Randal L. Schwartz) To: Laszlo Nagy References: <353856.29096.qm@web121401.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <4D11F114.5050301@shopzeus.com> x-mayan-date: Long count = 12.19.17.17.11; tzolkin = 3 Chuen; haab = 4 Kankin Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 13:51:11 -0800 In-Reply-To: <4D11F114.5050301@shopzeus.com> (Laszlo Nagy's message of "Wed, 22 Dec 2010 13:37:40 +0100") Message-ID: <86ipykkvjk.fsf@red.stonehenge.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: do i need a dedicated ip address for https? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 21:51:12 -0000 >>>>> "Laszlo" == Laszlo Nagy writes: Laszlo> But there are possibilities. You can use different SSL certificates for the Laszlo> same ip address and different port numbers: Laszlo> https://your_domain_1:4430 Laszlo> https://your_domain_2:4431 That's a bad idea if you expect that any of your visitors are coming from behind most corporate firewalls, because the proxy "CONNECT" command is almost always limited to port 443 as a "security feature". -- Randal L. Schwartz - Stonehenge Consulting Services, Inc. - +1 503 777 0095 Smalltalk/Perl/Unix consulting, Technical writing, Comedy, etc. etc. See http://methodsandmessages.posterous.com/ for Smalltalk discussion From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 24 02:26:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D950106566B for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 02:26:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E0DC8FC18 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 02:26:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.193]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DE005C21; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 12:31:00 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4D1403F1.3070607@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 12:22:41 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101119 Thunderbird/3.0.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: utisoft@gmail.com References: <4D130719.5090203@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4D133600.4010002@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <4D135558.4000101@herveybayaustralia.com.au> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD Athlon64 Mainboard - NOT SPAM: please check it out :) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 02:26:09 -0000 On 12/24/10 01:44, Chris Rees wrote: > On 23 December 2010 13:57, Da Rock > wrote: > >> On 12/23/10 23:16, Chris Rees wrote: >> >>> On 23 December 2010 11:44, Da Rock >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>> Thanks, but Athlon64 is a 939. Yeah, it may not be worth salvaging, but I >>>> thought the cost might be less... I'm more than likely wrong. Worth >>>> putting >>>> feelers out, though :) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> Athlon64s can be 754, 939 or AM2. Perhaps you meant *your* Athlon64 is a >>> 939? >>> >>> Sorry you're not having much luck. >>> >>> If I knew the Aussie market I'd help you to pick something comparable, >>> but that's better left to someone more local for you! >>> >>> Hope you get some results soon. >>> >>> >>> >>> >> Well thats from memory, and it is pretty old now I agree. Might have been a >> local thing then. As I remember it only the Athlon and then Semperon's were >> 754. The 64's and FX's were 939. The later Athlons were AM2, but that was >> just after I got this one, and they're the X2's I believe. But again, that >> may have been local. >> > I think you're thinking of Socket 462. This might clear it up a little: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Athlon64 > > Chris > No, but you're right I'll agree. Mustn't have been available via my sources though- only the 32bit processors were 754 here, 64 had to be a 939. Probably some smartarse' marketing ploy... :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 24 03:07:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DDAE106566C for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:07:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (relay2.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F11EB8FC17 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:07:38 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.93.1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (account sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.125.240] verified) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.13) with ESMTPSA id 15193985 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:07:36 +0600 Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oBO37Zsq016729 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:07:36 +0600 (OMST) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id oBO37Zcb016728 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:07:35 +0600 (OMST) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:07:35 +0600 From: Victor Sudakov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101224030735.GA16472@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Victor Sudakov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101223172752.GA8539@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20101223201249.ea7648aa.freebsd@edvax.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101223201249.ea7648aa.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Organization: AO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.livejournal.com/pubkey.bml?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 Subject: Re: rc.d and environment variables X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:07:39 -0000 Polytropon wrote: > > > > The svnserve daemon is started from /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve. I need to > > pass the environment variable KRB5_KTNAME=/home/svn/svn.keytab to the > > daemon on start. How do I do that? > > If the user corresponding to the svnservice has a login > shell, which would usually be the system's default > dialog shell, the C shell, you could edit /etc/csh.cshrc > and put > > setenv KRB5_KTNAME /home/svn/svn.keytab > > to make it a system-wide setting (or use the user's > ~/.cshrc for a user-only setting). I have tried putting "setenv KRB5_KTNAME /home/svn/svn.keytab" in ~svn/.cshrc, it does not help. Evidently the svn user's login shell is not called when "/usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve start" is called. > In case the user does NOT have a default shell, I think > you should be able to also define a system-wide environmental > variable by coding > > KRB5_KTNAME=/home/svn/svn.keytab; export KRB5_KTNAME > > into /etc/rc.local (which will be executed at system startup). > See "man rc.local" for details. Excuse me? What does /etc/rc.local have to do with the rc.subr framework? Of course I can abandon the standard /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve script and write my own one, or start svnserve from /etc/rc.local (which I will do if I don't find a more graceful way), but it is not what the question was about. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 24 03:08:57 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96299106566B for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:08:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Staff@annunciasubito.com) Received: from relay2.tre.it (mail.tre.it [62.13.171.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1CCE8FC1C for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:08:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from miummr0mt01.um.ced.h3g.it ([10.216.58.129]) by relay2.tre.it with ESMTP id oBO2fNn1022568-oBO2fNn2022568 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:41:23 +0100 Received: from [192.168.0.102] ([10.94.23.166]) by miummr0mt01.um.ced.h3g.it (MOS 3.6.5-GR) with SMTP id BVW10007; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:40:46 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:41:22 +0100 Mime-version: 1.0 From: To: Message-Id: <20101224034122.WUSLYMDHRCVQKG@annunciasubito.com> Original-recipient: rfc822;questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/mixed; Boundary="--=BOUNDARY_1224341_GKYP_HROU_UEYG_HVXF" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: Subject: Buon Natale e felice anno nuovo X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:08:57 -0000 Questo messaggio C( in formato MIME. PoichC( il tuo programma di posta non comprende questo formato, una porta o tutto il messaggio potrebbe non essere leggibile. ----=BOUNDARY_1224341_GKYP_HROU_UEYG_HVXF Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable I Nostri siti di Annunci gratis: www=2Evucumbra=2Eit "NewS" www=2Eannunciasubito=2Ecom "consigliato" www=2Evetrinaannunci=2Enet "consigliato" www=2Eiltuoposts=2Eit www=2Eannuncifreschi=2Eit "NEWS" www=2Eannunciitalia=2Enet www=2Eannunciz=2Eit www=2Eannuncinews=2Ecom www=2Ewordannunci=2Eit www=2Eannuncissimi=2Eit www=2Eannunciannunci=2Ecom ----=BOUNDARY_1224341_GKYP_HROU_UEYG_HVXF-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 24 03:13:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEBE610656A4 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:13:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (relay2.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 432C28FC21 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:13:54 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.93.1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (account sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.125.240] verified) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.13) with ESMTPSA id 15194069 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:13:53 +0600 Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oBO3DrHr016906 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:13:53 +0600 (OMST) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id oBO3DrP4016905 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:13:53 +0600 (OMST) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:13:53 +0600 From: Victor Sudakov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101224031352.GB16472@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Victor Sudakov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101223172752.GA8539@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20101223201249.ea7648aa.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101223191443.GA24653@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101223191443.GA24653@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Organization: AO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.livejournal.com/pubkey.bml?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 Subject: Re: rc.d and environment variables X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:13:56 -0000 Jerry McAllister wrote: > > > > > > The svnserve daemon is started from /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve. I need to > > > pass the environment variable KRB5_KTNAME=/home/svn/svn.keytab to the > > > daemon on start. How do I do that? > > > > If the user corresponding to the svnservice has a login > > shell, which would usually be the system's default > > dialog shell, the C shell, you could edit /etc/csh.cshrc > > and put > > > > setenv KRB5_KTNAME /home/svn/svn.keytab > > > > to make it a system-wide setting (or use the user's > > ~/.cshrc for a user-only setting). > > > > In case the user does NOT have a default shell, I think > > you should be able to also define a system-wide environmental > > variable by coding > > > > KRB5_KTNAME=/home/svn/svn.keytab; export KRB5_KTNAME > > > > into /etc/rc.local (which will be executed at system startup). > > See "man rc.local" for details. > > > > Put it in /etc/rc.conf and have your script read up rc.conf and > set any of the stuff in there it is interested in, such as KRB5_KINAME. What "my script" do you mean? The script /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve is already installed by the port, how can I make the stock script read up KRB5_KTNAME from rc.conf? And besides, KRB5_KTNAME should be only defined for the svn user (the user svnserve runs from) and not any other user. > I think that is the officially sanctioned way of doing such things. Of course I can always write my own script or put something like su -l svn -c 'usr/local/bin/svnserve -d --listen-port=3690 bla bla' into /etc/rc.local, but the question was about the rc.d framework. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 24 03:17:39 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 137CB1065735 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:17:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 697A98FC0C for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:17:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-37-207.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.37.207]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id C76FB1E58F; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 04:17:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id oBO3HZZ3005212; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 04:17:35 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 04:17:35 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Victor Sudakov Message-Id: <20101224041735.d885da93.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20101224030735.GA16472@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> References: <20101223172752.GA8539@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20101223201249.ea7648aa.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101224030735.GA16472@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc.d and environment variables X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:17:39 -0000 On Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:07:35 +0600, Victor Sudakov wrote: > I have tried putting "setenv KRB5_KTNAME /home/svn/svn.keytab" in > ~svn/.cshrc, it does not help. Evidently the svn user's login shell is > not called when "/usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve start" is called. I did already assume something like that. This mechanism relies on some kind of login that causes the shell to be run (usually an interactive shell), which isn't the case here. > Excuse me? What does /etc/rc.local have to do with the rc.subr > framework? Nothing. The /etc/rc.local script is executed along with the system startup. It is considered obsolete (I think), but it should work, and therefore be able to set a system-wide environment variable. This script is not in any relation with the rc.subr framework. > Of course I can abandon the standard /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve > script and write my own one, or start svnserve from /etc/rc.local > (which I will do if I don't find a more graceful way), but it is not > what the question was about. Yes, I fully understand: You need to set an environmental variable that will be picked up later on by the svnserve program (in some way, not neccessarily by accessing a file). That's why I think KRB5_KTNAME=/home/svn/svn.keytab; export KRB5_KTNAME in /etc/rc.local should create the $KRB5_KTNAME environment variable at system startup. Anyway, did you find a way to use some _flags= setting for /etc/rc.conf to be used by svnserve? This would be the method most other programs handle things like configuration flags that are not set by an own config file. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 24 03:25:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC9A2106564A for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:25:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D9428FC0A for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:25:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-37-207.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.37.207]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 747851E2EC; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 04:25:43 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id oBO3Pgxs005254; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 04:25:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 04:25:42 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Victor Sudakov Message-Id: <20101224042542.3e21a6df.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20101224031352.GB16472@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> References: <20101223172752.GA8539@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20101223201249.ea7648aa.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101223191443.GA24653@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20101224031352.GB16472@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc.d and environment variables X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:25:44 -0000 On Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:13:53 +0600, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Of course I can always write my own script or put something like > su -l svn -c 'usr/local/bin/svnserve -d --listen-port=3690 bla bla' > into /etc/rc.local, but the question was about the rc.d framework. Environmental variables cannot be controlled by the rc.d framework, as far as I understand. Using login classes to define them should be the correct way. >From "man login.conf": setenv list A comma-separated list of environment variables and values to which they are to be set. What did you enter for the svnserve user in /etc/login.conf, and did you make sure there is no override setting in the corresponding user's ~/.login.conf? A valid setting should look like this, :setenv=KRB5_KTNAME=/home/svn/svn.keytab: embedded into the proper structures. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 24 03:27:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEA281065698 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:27:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E1898FC17 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:27:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyf6 with SMTP id 6so3372579eyf.13 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 19:27:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.31.209 with SMTP id z17mr7157067ebc.12.1293161272290; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 19:27:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.112.145 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 19:27:32 -0800 (PST) From: Chris Brennan Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 22:27:32 -0500 Message-ID: To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: fetching mail (but not fetchmail) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:27:54 -0000 Bit of an odd question. But I will try. Is it possible to set up some mechanism (in freebsd or maybe gentoo (doesn't matter to me)) to pop/imap into my mail location and download everything as storage and then I imap to my local machine to read my mail. I realize I can pop/imap directly into my mail, the goal of this exorcise is to store my mail on one of my local servers and not my windows machine which can change at a moment's notice. (I just don't like the idea of permanent/long-term storage in Windows :/ ) C- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 24 03:31:13 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AB301065670 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:31:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (relay2.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68F378FC15 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:31:11 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.93.1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (account sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.125.240] verified) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.13) with ESMTPSA id 15194271 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:31:10 +0600 Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oBO3VARV017165 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:31:10 +0600 (OMST) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id oBO3VAOs017164 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:31:10 +0600 (OMST) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:31:10 +0600 From: Victor Sudakov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101224033110.GC16472@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Victor Sudakov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101223172752.GA8539@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20101223201249.ea7648aa.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101223191443.GA24653@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20101223205456.21ddbe27.freebsd@edvax.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101223205456.21ddbe27.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Organization: AO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.livejournal.com/pubkey.bml?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 Subject: Re: rc.d and environment variables X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:31:13 -0000 Polytropon wrote: [dd] > > Anyway, if svnserve is able to be passed a command string > to, a setting like > > svnserve_flags="... -k /home/svn/svn.keytab ..." No, this is not a svnserve option, it is a setting used by libsasl2 with which svnserve is linked (or even by libkrb5.so). > > coded in /etc/rc.conf or /etc/rc.conf.local would work, > and would also be the preferred method for such things. > In fact, I've not come across the need to have an environmental > variable to store a configuration setting for an additional > program, as such kind of variables is mainly for "low level" > system use, mostly. This need is indeed rare, but not nonexistent. In fact, if cyrus-sasl implemented the keytab: configuration option, there would be no need to set KRB5_KTNAME prior to starting svnserve. I also remember a need to pass $ORACLE_HOME to apache on start for some PHP module to work correctly. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 24 03:32:28 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 113B51065674 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:32:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwboyer@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout025.mac.com (asmtpout025.mac.com [17.148.16.100]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFCEF8FC25 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:32:27 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from ruby.rwboyer.com ([38.102.24.57]) by asmtp025.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LDW001WHXU05A70@asmtp025.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 19:32:27 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-12-24_02:2010-12-24, 2010-12-24, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=1 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1012230141 From: Robert Boyer Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 22:32:24 -0500 Message-id: <7C86788D-9A22-479C-AF2B-5A7025F371E2@mac.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Subject: SAS HBA card for freebsd? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:32:28 -0000 I have been running FreeBSD for about a year and tracking the ZFS implementation for almost as long. I am reasonably happy with the current stable 8.1 ZFS configs that I have been running with a few TB of storage all managed with an integrated SATA controller on my test machine. I am about to invest a little bit of money in a production machine targeted for a bunch of cheapo storage attachment and plan to implement on FreeBSD / ZFS. I have searched around on this topic and most info seems to be a bit out of date or contradictory, so here is the question at the risk of being redundant. I need a SAS controller that has preferably 8 ports (two four channel) connections per card. I don't mind decent buying a RAID card but really really desire it to be configurable in HBA mode vs. RAID or JBOD with RAID signatures. There are plenty of HBA only cards that would be suitable but I can find none that seem to fit the bill in terms of FreeBSD. I have seen a couple of cheap RAID cards recommended but cannot seem to get a definitive answer of whether they are actually configurable as plain old disks (HBA mode) vs JBOD w/ RAID signature. Anybody using a reasonably priced card that fits the bill? Thanks RB From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 24 03:34:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39A751065672 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:34:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (relay2.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90EF68FC15 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:34:29 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.93.1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (account sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.125.240] verified) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.13) with ESMTPSA id 15194297 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:34:27 +0600 Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oBO3YRiQ017237 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:34:27 +0600 (OMST) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id oBO3YRof017236 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:34:27 +0600 (OMST) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:34:27 +0600 From: Victor Sudakov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101224033427.GD16472@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Victor Sudakov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101223172752.GA8539@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20101223201249.ea7648aa.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101223191443.GA24653@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20101223205456.21ddbe27.freebsd@edvax.de> <44zkrws0xx.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <44zkrws0xx.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Organization: AO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.livejournal.com/pubkey.bml?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 Subject: Re: rc.d and environment variables X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:34:30 -0000 Lowell Gilbert wrote: > > > I'm not sure this will work. The initial question was about > > how to obtain an environmental variable. If the rc.d script > > of svnserve sources /etc/rc.conf and/or /etc/rc.conf.local, > > it is okay, > > They do. rc.d scripts all start by sucking in rc.subr, which in turn > pulls in the rc.conf files. So how do I make the /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve script suck in KRB5_KTNAME for the "svn" user from the rc.conf* files? -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 24 03:43:16 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D9331065670 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:43:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (relay2.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 988578FC14 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:43:15 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.93.1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (account sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.125.240] verified) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.13) with ESMTPSA id 15194369 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:43:13 +0600 Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oBO3hDb0017365 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:43:13 +0600 (OMST) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id oBO3hDnf017364 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:43:13 +0600 (OMST) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:43:13 +0600 From: Victor Sudakov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101224034313.GE16472@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Victor Sudakov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101223172752.GA8539@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20101223201249.ea7648aa.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101224030735.GA16472@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20101224041735.d885da93.freebsd@edvax.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101224041735.d885da93.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Organization: AO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.livejournal.com/pubkey.bml?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 Subject: Re: rc.d and environment variables X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:43:16 -0000 Polytropon wrote: > > I have tried putting "setenv KRB5_KTNAME /home/svn/svn.keytab" in > > ~svn/.cshrc, it does not help. Evidently the svn user's login shell is > > not called when "/usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve start" is called. > > I did already assume something like that. This mechanism > relies on some kind of login that causes the shell to be > run (usually an interactive shell), which isn't the case > here. Besides, the login.conf capability database does not seem to be used by the rc.d framework either, which is sad. > > > Excuse me? What does /etc/rc.local have to do with the rc.subr > > framework? > > Nothing. The /etc/rc.local script is executed along with > the system startup. It is considered obsolete (I think), > but it should work, and therefore be able to set a system-wide > environment variable. I guess any environment variable set in the /etc/rc.local script would be available in the script itself and its children, but not system wide. Even if it were, remember, I do not need to change KRB5_KTNAME system wide, but just for one particular user. [dd] > > Anyway, did you find a way to use some _flags= setting for > /etc/rc.conf to be used by svnserve? This would be the > method most other programs handle things like configuration > flags that are not set by an own config file. To my regret, this is not a svnserve option, it is a setting used by libsasl2 with which svnserve is linked. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 24 03:46:46 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77298106564A for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:46:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwboyer@mac.com) Received: from asmtpout023.mac.com (asmtpout023.mac.com [17.148.16.98]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60E008FC15 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:46:46 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from ruby.rwboyer.com (38-102-24-57.baybroadband.net [38.102.24.57]) by asmtp023.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Exchange Server 7u4-20.01 64bit (built Nov 21 2010)) with ESMTPSA id <0LDW0019EVPLXPA0@asmtp023.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 18:46:40 -0800 (PST) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.2.15,1.0.148,0.0.0000 definitions=2010-12-24_01:2010-12-24, 2010-12-24, 1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 ipscore=0 suspectscore=4 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx engine=6.0.2-1010190000 definitions=main-1012230137 From: Robert Boyer Date: Thu, 23 Dec 2010 21:46:33 -0500 Message-id: <5BBDC704-EE73-4861-8716-554CEBDA3691@mac.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) Subject: Best SAS controller X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:46:46 -0000 I have been running FreeBSD for about a year and tracking the ZFS implementation for almost as long. I am reasonably happy with the current stable 8.1 ZFS configs that I have been running with a few TB of storage all managed with an integrated SATA controller on my test machine. I am about to invest a little bit of money in a production machine targeted for a bunch of cheapo storage attachment and plan to implement on FreeBSD / ZFS. I have searched around on this topic and most info seems to be a bit out of date or contradictory, so here is the question at the risk of being redundant. I need a SAS controller that has preferably 8 ports (two four channel) connections per card. I don't mind decent buying a RAID card but really really desire it to be configurable in HBA mode vs. RAID or JBOD with RAID signatures. There are plenty of HBA only cards that would be suitable but I can find none that seem to fit the bill in terms of FreeBSD. I have seen a couple of cheap RAID cards recommended but cannot seem to get a definitive answer of whether they are actually configurable as plain old disks (HBA mode) vs JBOD w/ RAID signature. Anybody using a reasonably priced card that fits the bill? Thanks RB From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 24 03:50:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A6F106564A for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:50:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (relay2.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 192478FC0C for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:50:43 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.93.1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (account sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.125.240] verified) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.13) with ESMTPSA id 15194442 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:50:42 +0600 Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oBO3ogYl017486 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:50:42 +0600 (OMST) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id oBO3ogEh017485 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:50:42 +0600 (OMST) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:50:41 +0600 From: Victor Sudakov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101224035041.GF16472@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Victor Sudakov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101223172752.GA8539@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20101223201249.ea7648aa.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101223191443.GA24653@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20101224031352.GB16472@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20101224042542.3e21a6df.freebsd@edvax.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101224042542.3e21a6df.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Organization: AO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.livejournal.com/pubkey.bml?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 Subject: Re: rc.d and environment variables X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 03:50:44 -0000 Polytropon wrote: > > Of course I can always write my own script or put something like > > su -l svn -c 'usr/local/bin/svnserve -d --listen-port=3690 bla bla' > > into /etc/rc.local, but the question was about the rc.d framework. > > Environmental variables cannot be controlled by the rc.d > framework, as far as I understand. Using login classes to > define them should be the correct way. > > >From "man login.conf": > > setenv list A comma-separated list of > environment variables and > values to which they are to > be set. I thought of that, and in fact I wrote about it in the very first message: > > I tried to do this via a login class for the svn user, but it did > > not work. If I first 'su -l svn' and then start the daemon > > manually, the environment variable is set all right, but not when > > it is started from /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve. > > What did you enter for the svnserve user in /etc/login.conf, svn:\ :setenv=KRB5_KTNAME=~/svn.keytab:\ :tc=default: > and did you make sure there is no override setting in the > corresponding user's ~/.login.conf? I am pretty sure because when I login interactively as svn, I see $ whoami svn $ printenv | grep KT KRB5_KTNAME=/home/svn/svn.keytab $ But it does not work for the rc.d script. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 24 04:39:42 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CDAA106566C for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 04:39:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA548FC0A for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 04:39:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.193]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id E798F5C21 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 14:44:33 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4D14233F.4070107@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 14:36:15 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101119 Thunderbird/3.0.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101223172752.GA8539@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20101223201249.ea7648aa.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101223191443.GA24653@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20101224031352.GB16472@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20101224042542.3e21a6df.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101224035041.GF16472@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> In-Reply-To: <20101224035041.GF16472@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: rc.d and environment variables X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 04:39:42 -0000 On 12/24/10 13:50, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Polytropon wrote: > >>> Of course I can always write my own script or put something like >>> su -l svn -c 'usr/local/bin/svnserve -d --listen-port=3690 bla bla' >>> into /etc/rc.local, but the question was about the rc.d framework. >>> >> Environmental variables cannot be controlled by the rc.d >> framework, as far as I understand. Using login classes to >> define them should be the correct way. >> >> > From "man login.conf": >> >> setenv list A comma-separated list of >> environment variables and >> values to which they are to >> be set. >> > I thought of that, and in fact I wrote about it in the very first > message: > > >>> I tried to do this via a login class for the svn user, but it did >>> not work. If I first 'su -l svn' and then start the daemon >>> manually, the environment variable is set all right, but not when >>> it is started from /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve. >>> > >> What did you enter for the svnserve user in /etc/login.conf, >> > svn:\ > :setenv=KRB5_KTNAME=~/svn.keytab:\ > :tc=default: > > > >> and did you make sure there is no override setting in the >> corresponding user's ~/.login.conf? >> > I am pretty sure because when I login interactively as svn, I see > > $ whoami > svn > $ printenv | grep KT > KRB5_KTNAME=/home/svn/svn.keytab > $ > > But it does not work for the rc.d script. > > Doesn't the rc.d script run as root initially and then a method (default flags, etc) is used to change the owner to a nobody (restricted privilege user)? Just my 2c, but please correct me if I'm wrong. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 24 05:47:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C13AB106566C for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 05:47:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3fd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3229C8FC1D for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 05:47:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.187.76.163]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBO5laKa016270 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 05:47:36 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk oBO5laKa016270 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1293169656; bh=Ufz67givKanoGK0zLo9vlKXj2BVEElRDhmMmKh14m7g=; h=Message-ID:Date:From:MIME-Version:To:Subject:References: In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Cc:Content-Type:Date:From:In-Reply-To: Message-ID:Mime-Version:References:To; z=Message-ID:=20<4D1433F0.9@infracaninophile.co.uk>|Date:=20Fri,=20 24=20Dec=202010=2005:47:28=20+0000|From:=20Matthew=20Seaman=20|User-Agent:=20Mozilla/5.0=20(Macinto sh=3B=20U=3B=20Intel=20Mac=20OS=20X=2010.6=3B=20en-US=3B=20rv:1.9. 2.13)=20Gecko/20101207=20Thunderbird/3.1.7|MIME-Version:=201.0|To: =20freebsd-questions@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20fetching=20mail= 20(but=20not=20fetchmail)|References:=20|In-Reply-To:=20|X-Enigmail-Versio n:=201.1.1|OpenPGP:=20id=3D60AE908C|Content-Type:=20multipart/sign ed=3B=20micalg=3Dpgp-sha1=3B=0D=0A=20protocol=3D"application/pgp-s ignature"=3B=0D=0A=20boundary=3D"------------enig41B38B387ABD1C761 6F7DDA1"; b=YS36fVOJfNVPtGUvDSY6icTdmqMTIYsYYwAWISaOhUA8zQMklsXP3+FVRtdQZPGwV /ZnG9R/6kL6DYWxGKSIa2iDDVr0zHETzmwEbl7RzxdGW5KKjYJyCQ6ZITtU2TeXj09 tu/pSq+xGTbHldyeZYQIhx5au35FKiP9+BuMI9ag= Message-ID: <4D1433F0.9@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 05:47:28 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1 OpenPGP: id=60AE908C Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig41B38B387ABD1C7616F7DDA1" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.5 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,SPF_FAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk Subject: Re: fetching mail (but not fetchmail) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 05:47:44 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig41B38B387ABD1C7616F7DDA1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 24/12/2010 03:27, Chris Brennan wrote: > Bit of an odd question. But I will try. Is it possible to set up some > mechanism (in freebsd or maybe gentoo (doesn't matter to me)) to pop/im= ap > into my mail location and download everything as storage and then I ima= p to > my local machine to read my mail. I realize I can pop/imap directly int= o my > mail, the goal of this exorcise is to store my mail on one of my local > servers and not my windows machine which can change at a moment's notic= e. (I > just don't like the idea of permanent/long-term storage in Windows :/ )= fetchmail -- http://fetchmail.berlios.de/ plus dovecot -- http://www.dovecot.org/ They're in ports. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. 7 Priory Courtyard Flat 3 PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey Ramsgate JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk Kent, CT11 9PW --------------enig41B38B387ABD1C7616F7DDA1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk0UM/gACgkQ8Mjk52CukIwdnQCgi4W/jtAUJq4vckenKOA22BOS f0MAniQ6c3A7+3tK8vR9VGUjrddfdUb4 =Cd0m -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig41B38B387ABD1C7616F7DDA1-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 24 06:02:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6602F1065670 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 06:02:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com (mail-ey0-f182.google.com [209.85.215.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 023368FC0A for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 06:02:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by eyf6 with SMTP id 6so3396921eyf.13 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 22:02:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.34.203 with SMTP id m11mr5227290ebd.12.1293170529217; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 22:02:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.112.145 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 22:01:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <4D1433F0.9@infracaninophile.co.uk> References: <4D1433F0.9@infracaninophile.co.uk> From: Chris Brennan Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 01:01:48 -0500 Message-ID: To: Matthew Seaman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fetching mail (but not fetchmail) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 06:02:12 -0000 n Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 12:47 AM, Matthew Seaman < m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk> wrote: > On 24/12/2010 03:27, Chris Brennan wrote: > > Bit of an odd question. But I will try. Is it possible to set up some > > mechanism (in freebsd or maybe gentoo (doesn't matter to me)) to pop/imap > > into my mail location and download everything as storage and then I imap > to > > my local machine to read my mail. I realize I can pop/imap directly into > my > > mail, the goal of this exorcise is to store my mail on one of my local > > servers and not my windows machine which can change at a moment's notice. > (I > > just don't like the idea of permanent/long-term storage in Windows :/ ) > > fetchmail -- http://fetchmail.berlios.de/ plus dovecot -- > http://www.dovecot.org/ > > They're in ports. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > Thanks but I I think maybe I wasn't entirely clear. With fetchmail (which is why I said but not fetchmail in the subject) I very well can download all my mail. For reading locally, on the console (not what I had in mind). Or is this where dovecot comes into play? To prepare the previously fetched mail and prepare it for pop/imap access? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 24 06:07:47 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47F211065672 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 06:07:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0D8A8FC12 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 06:07:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-37-207.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.37.207]) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BF421DCD3; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 07:07:45 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id oBO67hVK005877; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 07:07:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 07:07:43 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Chris Brennan Message-Id: <20101224070743.f6bf35e2.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <4D1433F0.9@infracaninophile.co.uk> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fetching mail (but not fetchmail) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 06:07:47 -0000 On Fri, 24 Dec 2010 01:01:48 -0500, Chris Brennan wrote: > Thanks but I I think maybe I wasn't entirely clear. With fetchmail (which is > why I said but not fetchmail in the subject) I very well can download all my > mail. For reading locally, on the console (not what I had in mind). Or is > this where dovecot comes into play? To prepare the previously fetched mail > and prepare it for pop/imap access? No. The fetchmail program usually fetches (copies and flushes, or not flushes) the POP mailbox and places the content on your local machine into your user's mailbox, /var/mail/$USER. From there on, you can do with the mail what you want, e. g. view it with mail (from the base system), incorporate "from spool" into Sylpheed, Thunderbird, pine, whatever program you want, or continue processing with another program (e. g. to transfer the messages elsewhere - this is where docevot enters the scene). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 24 06:13:25 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B015B1065672 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 06:13:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xaero@xaerolimit.net) Received: from mail-ew0-f54.google.com (mail-ew0-f54.google.com [209.85.215.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BAC98FC14 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 06:13:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ewy24 with SMTP id 24so3611663ewy.13 for ; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 22:13:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.15.146 with SMTP id k18mr1573471eba.38.1293171204059; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 22:13:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.112.145 with HTTP; Thu, 23 Dec 2010 22:13:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101224070743.f6bf35e2.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <4D1433F0.9@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20101224070743.f6bf35e2.freebsd@edvax.de> From: Chris Brennan Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 01:13:03 -0500 Message-ID: To: Polytropon Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fetching mail (but not fetchmail) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 06:13:25 -0000 On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 1:07 AM, Polytropon wrote: > On Fri, 24 Dec 2010 01:01:48 -0500, Chris Brennan > wrote: > > Thanks but I I think maybe I wasn't entirely clear. With fetchmail (which > is > > why I said but not fetchmail in the subject) I very well can download all > my > > mail. For reading locally, on the console (not what I had in mind). Or is > > this where dovecot comes into play? To prepare the previously fetched > mail > > and prepare it for pop/imap access? > > No. The fetchmail program usually fetches (copies and flushes, > or not flushes) the POP mailbox and places the content on your > local machine into your user's mailbox, /var/mail/$USER. From > there on, you can do with the mail what you want, e. g. view > it with mail (from the base system), incorporate "from spool" > into Sylpheed, Thunderbird, pine, whatever program you want, > or continue processing with another program (e. g. to transfer > the messages elsewhere - this is where docevot enters the > scene). > > Ok so fetchmail is step 1, step 2 is to unleash dovecet on /var/mail/$USER and then just point ex: thunderbird at my local server:port and happy hunting? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 24 06:33:45 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF76C106564A for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 06:33:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dkelly@hiwaay.net) Received: from fly.hiwaay.net (fly.hiwaay.net [216.180.54.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81A158FC15 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 06:33:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.0.9] (dynamic-24-42-224-110.knology.net [24.42.224.110] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by fly.hiwaay.net (8.13.8/8.13.8/fly) with ESMTP id oBO6XgAS008764 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 24 Dec 2010 00:33:43 -0600 References: <4D1433F0.9@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable From: David Kelly Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 00:33:42 -0600 To: Chris Brennan X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fetching mail (but not fetchmail) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 06:33:45 -0000 On Dec 24, 2010, at 12:01 AM, Chris Brennan wrote: > Thanks but I I think maybe I wasn't entirely clear. With fetchmail = (which is > why I said but not fetchmail in the subject) I very well can download = all my > mail. For reading locally, on the console (not what I had in mind). Or = is > this where dovecot comes into play? To prepare the previously fetched = mail > and prepare it for pop/imap access? Yes, that is exactly what he was saying. Fetchmail puts it where ever = you tell it to. All you have to do is put the email where dovecot can = find it in a format dovecot understands. You can think of dovecot as a = remote controlled email reader, one which can be driven by Mail.app, = Outlook, or Firefox. But in doing this you are not giving up the ability = to do mail on your console. When using maildir format both mutt and dovecot can operate out of the = same mail repository at the same time. For example I use ~/Maildir/ and the maildir format. Also use procmail for initial sorting and filtering with bogofilter. In = my .fetchmailrc like this: defaults proto pop3 fetchall mda "/usr/local/bin/procmail -d dkelly" .procmailrc something like this: MAILDIR=3D$HOME/Maildir/ #you'd better make sure it exists DEFAULT=3D/var/mail/$LOGNAME # Make a copy of everything incoming: :0 c $HOME/Mail_Backup/ # Add a Lines: header if one is lacking, so mutt knows a message's size :0 Bfh * H ?? !^Lines: * -1^0 * 1^1 ^.*$ | formail -A "Lines: $=3D" # bogofilter -u trains all tokens as spam or non-spam :0 HB: * ? bogofilter -u .spam/ # detect dupes :0 Whc: msgid.lock | formail -D 131072 msgid.cache # divert dupes :0 a: .dups/ # ultimate point of delivery :0 ./ The above .procmail puts a copy of everything in ~/Mail_Backup/ just in = case. -- David Kelly N4HHE, dkelly@HiWAAY.net =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D Whom computers would destroy, they must first drive mad. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 24 08:03:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89679106564A for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 08:03:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (relay2.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7ACA8FC0A for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 08:03:56 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.93.1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (account sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.125.240] verified) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.13) with ESMTPSA id 15198437 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 14:03:55 +0600 Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oBO83swI022076 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 14:03:54 +0600 (OMST) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id oBO83sRu022075 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 14:03:54 +0600 (OMST) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 14:03:54 +0600 From: Victor Sudakov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101224080354.GA21712@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Victor Sudakov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101223172752.GA8539@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20101223201249.ea7648aa.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101223191443.GA24653@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20101224031352.GB16472@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20101224042542.3e21a6df.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101224035041.GF16472@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <4D14233F.4070107@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D14233F.4070107@herveybayaustralia.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Organization: AO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.livejournal.com/pubkey.bml?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 Subject: Re: rc.d and environment variables X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 08:03:58 -0000 Da Rock wrote: [dd] > Doesn't the rc.d script run as root initially and then a method (default > flags, etc) is used to change the owner to a nobody (restricted > privilege user)? Just my 2c, but please correct me if I'm wrong. That is probably correct, rc.subr does "su -m $user", but the login class is not applied there, nor is the users's shell called. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 24 08:13:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 675C2106564A for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 08:13:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A7AC8FC16 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 08:13:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.193]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D9B55C21 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 18:18:21 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4D14555B.3000909@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 18:10:03 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101119 Thunderbird/3.0.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101223172752.GA8539@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20101223201249.ea7648aa.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101223191443.GA24653@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20101224031352.GB16472@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20101224042542.3e21a6df.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101224035041.GF16472@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <4D14233F.4070107@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20101224080354.GA21712@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> In-Reply-To: <20101224080354.GA21712@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: rc.d and environment variables X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 08:13:30 -0000 On 12/24/10 18:03, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Da Rock wrote: > > [dd] > > >> Doesn't the rc.d script run as root initially and then a method (default >> flags, etc) is used to change the owner to a nobody (restricted >> privilege user)? Just my 2c, but please correct me if I'm wrong. >> > > That is probably correct, rc.subr does "su -m $user", but the login > class is not applied there, nor is the users's shell called. > > Exactly. Which means that you'd have to adapt root's env because root's shell would be called(?). PITA, but as an alternative couldn't all the keytabs be stored in the same _secure_ location? Then a global env could be used. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 24 08:33:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06D4D106564A for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 08:33:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88EFF8FC14 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 08:33:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so6564566wwf.31 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 00:33:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=t8VP8CgdW47ixOvN8HZZdBWisXIeWht0w4Bp3fZDnpY=; b=H+Z5kzzTACQGUC6ppMw20gx2Vh/qeIWoy/6iSgMl7THnbEgckJkmXi/uoOHjK9/AWw XYPG/DNjZOl91ek57A2OV9Kj7OEy861nAmvAcNZLoHVf/bhb5YKvxIUgkan0IEs0PeRc 7BtiGkmfICWY9FAhzyPhNdAZJuA2K77w3dzS8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=S11YYa7gdgIST0xzBjNwpX+5I/PtTgWeR36pu4z0790S6pILzcOmVn09iGWTmpsN5g fuLDumbnDFM/2Juh7bW4tvYEkMQqR9D9Fd8gIK55iWJ55+J0KNzw1XmuMvg52hMwk/Dg 0s19E0JHP5C22TNbybogc7frBk76GJJ7NQLUk= Received: by 10.227.152.17 with SMTP id e17mr5534438wbw.70.1293179587250; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 00:33:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q18sm5921114wbe.5.2010.12.24.00.33.05 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 24 Dec 2010 00:33:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 08:33:04 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101224083304.2458afe8@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20101224033427.GD16472@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> References: <20101223172752.GA8539@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20101223201249.ea7648aa.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101223191443.GA24653@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20101223205456.21ddbe27.freebsd@edvax.de> <44zkrws0xx.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20101224033427.GD16472@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.22.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: rc.d and environment variables X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 08:33:09 -0000 On Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:34:27 +0600 Victor Sudakov wrote: > Lowell Gilbert wrote: > > > > > I'm not sure this will work. The initial question was about > > > how to obtain an environmental variable. If the rc.d script > > > of svnserve sources /etc/rc.conf and/or /etc/rc.conf.local, > > > it is okay, > > > > They do. rc.d scripts all start by sucking in rc.subr, which in > > turn pulls in the rc.conf files. > > So how do I make the /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve script suck in > KRB5_KTNAME for the "svn" user from the rc.conf* files? Just export it from rc.conf From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 24 09:31:56 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE34F106564A for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:31:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (relay2.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D94358FC08 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:31:22 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.93.1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (account sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.125.240] verified) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.13) with ESMTPSA id 15200764 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 15:29:02 +0600 Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oBO9T2oE023697 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 15:29:02 +0600 (OMST) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id oBO9T1bF023696 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 15:29:01 +0600 (OMST) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 15:29:01 +0600 From: Victor Sudakov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101224092901.GB23384@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Victor Sudakov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101223172752.GA8539@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20101223201249.ea7648aa.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101223191443.GA24653@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20101223205456.21ddbe27.freebsd@edvax.de> <44zkrws0xx.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20101224033427.GD16472@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20101224083304.2458afe8@gumby.homeunix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101224083304.2458afe8@gumby.homeunix.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Organization: AO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.livejournal.com/pubkey.bml?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 Subject: Re: rc.d and environment variables X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:31:56 -0000 RW wrote: > > > > > > > I'm not sure this will work. The initial question was about > > > > how to obtain an environmental variable. If the rc.d script > > > > of svnserve sources /etc/rc.conf and/or /etc/rc.conf.local, > > > > it is okay, > > > > > > They do. rc.d scripts all start by sucking in rc.subr, which in > > > turn pulls in the rc.conf files. > > > > So how do I make the /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve script suck in > > KRB5_KTNAME for the "svn" user from the rc.conf* files? > > Just export it from rc.conf If exported from rc.conf, it will affect all daemons. I need to set it only for svnserve or for the svn user (which is equivalent in my case). -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 24 09:37:27 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA610106564A for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:37:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (relay2.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A2A88FC13 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:37:26 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.93.1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (account sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.125.240] verified) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.13) with ESMTPSA id 15200985 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 15:37:25 +0600 Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oBO9bPWG024004 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 15:37:25 +0600 (OMST) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id oBO9bOCd024003 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 15:37:24 +0600 (OMST) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 15:37:24 +0600 From: Victor Sudakov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101224093724.GC23384@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Victor Sudakov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101223172752.GA8539@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20101223201249.ea7648aa.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101223191443.GA24653@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20101224031352.GB16472@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20101224042542.3e21a6df.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101224035041.GF16472@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <4D14233F.4070107@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20101224080354.GA21712@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <4D14555B.3000909@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D14555B.3000909@herveybayaustralia.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Organization: AO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.livejournal.com/pubkey.bml?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 Subject: Re: rc.d and environment variables X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 09:37:27 -0000 Da Rock wrote: > > > > > >>Doesn't the rc.d script run as root initially and then a method (default > >>flags, etc) is used to change the owner to a nobody (restricted > >>privilege user)? Just my 2c, but please correct me if I'm wrong. > >> > > > >That is probably correct, rc.subr does "su -m $user", but the login > >class is not applied there, nor is the users's shell called. > > > > > Exactly. Which means that you'd have to adapt root's env because root's > shell would be called(?). In this case, how do I limit the variables's visibility only to the particular daemon (svnserve) or particular user (svn)? > > PITA, but as an alternative couldn't all the keytabs be stored in the > same _secure_ location? Then a global env could be used. I really don't know what the security implications will be if /etc/krb5.keytab is readable by anyone besides the root user? Do you have a clue about it? There are other services' keys stored there besides svn (host/*, cvs/* etc). -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 24 10:21:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8E3F106564A for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 10:21:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hedayati.mo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63EFF8FC08 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 10:21:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so6631421wwf.31 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 02:21:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:from:date :message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=iE2g3F6DVCoKadaGtwV95oHtKKBs2PTy4/okv9M4CMY=; b=nReroBeLDksBlIUgCY+gcdm7p9oDEhu/h0lzPnVPGyxUaLBxH0ajtlAgIH3rdV9aDp /ko2cVX6dVSfK0a8ToNO1R+TZzMcl6mx36xOn1Ab9YUjAcmYaTcAytcmzJFt/VObemZM H7Y4kCl8qXNGAJ6W5uK/YW53KkWA5DRPLJn9c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=azNCKVXzCUPSBfHa072OO1ngQFv+Y59qmoZQ5BPW89+q+qVpw8i3vr9sw+3iAPy9yx KLWqp7w60TLwTCoqEVCf1KLOUCQ0bwdDMv/4SFJ27sutV+IVufMmhGnhFTcjPsz441cB QJQdSsUkZHe0vhMG3AIieYn+5dmRSO0/xcSuQ= Received: by 10.227.176.134 with SMTP id be6mr5604062wbb.147.1293186112240; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 02:21:52 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.143.202 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 02:21:12 -0800 (PST) From: Mohammad Hedayati Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 13:51:12 +0330 Message-ID: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Inappropriate ioctl for device X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 10:21:53 -0000 I'm writing a simple char device. So far everything went so good (read/write), but here I'm going to add support for ioctl. int ioctl(struct cdev *dev, u_long cmd, caddr_t data, int flags, struct thread *td) { int error = 0; uprintf("Here...\n"); return(error); } and I'm calling it here: len = ioctl(cd, 0); perror("ioctl"); but when runnig it says: ioctl: Inappropriate ioctl for device where's the problem? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 24 10:41:51 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 561381065670 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 10:41:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@herveybayaustralia.com.au) Received: from mail.unitedinsong.com.au (mail.unitedinsong.com.au [150.101.178.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 056898FC0C for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 10:41:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au (laptop1.herveybayaustralia.com.au [192.168.0.193]) by mail.unitedinsong.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D2515C21 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 20:46:42 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4D147821.3020706@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 20:38:25 +1000 From: Da Rock User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD amd64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.15) Gecko/20101119 Thunderbird/3.0.10 ThunderBrowse/3.3.4 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101223172752.GA8539@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20101223201249.ea7648aa.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101223191443.GA24653@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20101224031352.GB16472@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20101224042542.3e21a6df.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101224035041.GF16472@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <4D14233F.4070107@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20101224080354.GA21712@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <4D14555B.3000909@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20101224093724.GC23384@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> In-Reply-To: <20101224093724.GC23384@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: rc.d and environment variables X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 10:41:51 -0000 On 12/24/10 19:37, Victor Sudakov wrote: > Da Rock wrote: > >>> >>> >>>> Doesn't the rc.d script run as root initially and then a method (default >>>> flags, etc) is used to change the owner to a nobody (restricted >>>> privilege user)? Just my 2c, but please correct me if I'm wrong. >>>> >>>> >>> That is probably correct, rc.subr does "su -m $user", but the login >>> class is not applied there, nor is the users's shell called. >>> >>> >>> >> Exactly. Which means that you'd have to adapt root's env because root's >> shell would be called(?). >> > In this case, how do I limit the variables's visibility only to the > particular daemon (svnserve) or particular user (svn)? > > >> PITA, but as an alternative couldn't all the keytabs be stored in the >> same _secure_ location? Then a global env could be used. >> > I really don't know what the security implications will be if > /etc/krb5.keytab is readable by anyone besides the root user? Do you > have a clue about it? There are other services' keys stored there > besides svn (host/*, cvs/* etc). > > At the risk of getting laughed off stage, and pulling in yet another service, what about ldap? I believe there is supposed to be a way to store keytabs in ldap, which theoretically would mean only the particular services would be able to access their keytabs. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 24 12:16:30 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 204AE106564A for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 12:16:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A07868FC2A for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 12:16:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so6707409wwf.31 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 04:16:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ESiieKEeTZyhI982zsBsszoFZwRu/QmMojgzpbX1t4M=; b=NQ/7MrLHu6mOTYrMMmtFinHOiGVDmf0slsWSymOZbU7sYROGgTzZmbJtoTHj5FrKAU VYSuFQPKdpvByr2e1SyyzZzj/H0VDWTZH9R9SkZOX/bZAg81giT8kPRZerSHEgvIJrqP A/d5j9p+7SqX6wopyLK8Nq5jFwHx8iJXyQHFQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=LppjqTPD9SoIlnSm1vAgA57c/9c+0mxID8ZF5Gra7cNZAWCjRydJ1YxetImE7nvxA3 e2nMRnDNh0XRAgvcfK08PVo2ZUOiJ/Ji8/DfhB60VpWtMvFy7Mg5ek+OPd2TaHW8YDXG 1dWTIGrQQv2bmttuyWoO68ReMfDPfDvZYVtos= Received: by 10.216.156.149 with SMTP id m21mr2218579wek.22.1293192988575; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 04:16:28 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n11sm4266404wej.43.2010.12.24.04.16.26 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 24 Dec 2010 04:16:27 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 12:16:25 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101224121625.011c8fef@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20101224092901.GB23384@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> References: <20101223172752.GA8539@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20101223201249.ea7648aa.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101223191443.GA24653@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20101223205456.21ddbe27.freebsd@edvax.de> <44zkrws0xx.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20101224033427.GD16472@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20101224083304.2458afe8@gumby.homeunix.com> <20101224092901.GB23384@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.22.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: rc.d and environment variables X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 12:16:30 -0000 On Fri, 24 Dec 2010 15:29:01 +0600 Victor Sudakov wrote: > RW wrote: > > > > > > > > > I'm not sure this will work. The initial question was about > > > > > how to obtain an environmental variable. If the rc.d script > > > > > of svnserve sources /etc/rc.conf and/or /etc/rc.conf.local, > > > > > it is okay, > > > > > > > > They do. rc.d scripts all start by sucking in rc.subr, which in > > > > turn pulls in the rc.conf files. > > > > > > So how do I make the /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve script suck in > > > KRB5_KTNAME for the "svn" user from the rc.conf* files? > > > > Just export it from rc.conf > > If exported from rc.conf, it will affect all daemons. I need to set it > only for svnserve or for the svn user (which is equivalent in my > case). [ "$name" = "svnserve" ] && export KRB5_KTNAME="/home/svn/svn.keytab" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 24 14:26:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 711BA106566C for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 14:26:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (relay2.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB69C8FC0A for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 14:26:47 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.93.1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (account sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.125.240] verified) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.13) with ESMTPSA id 15207364 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 20:26:45 +0600 Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oBOEQi9x030428 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 20:26:45 +0600 (OMST) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id oBOEQior030427 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 20:26:44 +0600 (OMST) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 20:26:44 +0600 From: Victor Sudakov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101224142644.GA30333@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Victor Sudakov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101223201249.ea7648aa.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101223191443.GA24653@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20101224031352.GB16472@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20101224042542.3e21a6df.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101224035041.GF16472@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <4D14233F.4070107@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20101224080354.GA21712@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <4D14555B.3000909@herveybayaustralia.com.au> <20101224093724.GC23384@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <4D147821.3020706@herveybayaustralia.com.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4D147821.3020706@herveybayaustralia.com.au> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Organization: AO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.livejournal.com/pubkey.bml?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 Subject: Re: rc.d and environment variables X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 14:26:48 -0000 Da Rock wrote: [dd] > >I really don't know what the security implications will be if > >/etc/krb5.keytab is readable by anyone besides the root user? Do you > >have a clue about it? There are other services' keys stored there > >besides svn (host/*, cvs/* etc). > > > > > At the risk of getting laughed off stage, and pulling in yet another > service, what about ldap? I believe there is supposed to be a way to > store keytabs in ldap, which theoretically would mean only the > particular services would be able to access their keytabs. No matter where we store the keytabs, if it is not the default location (/etc/krb5.keytab for FreeBSD), we face the same problem of telling the server application about the alternative location of the keytab. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 24 14:30:38 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 482F81065673 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 14:30:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com (mail-qy0-f175.google.com [209.85.216.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EB188FC27 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 14:30:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qyk8 with SMTP id 8so7571773qyk.13 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 06:30:37 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.213.13 with SMTP id gu13mr4639982qcb.196.1293201036594; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 06:30:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.238.70 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 06:30:36 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [93.221.165.156] In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 15:30:36 +0100 Message-ID: From: "C. P. Ghost" To: Mohammad Hedayati Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Inappropriate ioctl for device X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 14:30:38 -0000 On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Mohammad Hedayati wrote: > I'm writing a simple char device. So far everything went so good > (read/write), but here I'm going to add support for ioctl. > > int > ioctl(struct cdev *dev, u_long cmd, caddr_t data, int flags, struct threa= d *td) > { > =A0 =A0 =A0int error =3D 0; > =A0 =A0 =A0uprintf("Here...\n"); > =A0 =A0 =A0return(error); > } > and I'm calling it here: > > len =3D ioctl(cd, 0); > perror("ioctl"); > > but when runnig it says: > > ioctl: Inappropriate ioctl for device Just a wild guess: are you sure you've hooked up your ioctl() function to the struct cdevsw, i.e. something like this? static struct cdevsw yourdevice_cdevsw =3D { .d_version =3D D_VERSION, .d_read =3D yourdevice_read, .d_write =3D yourdevice_write, .d_ioctl =3D yourdevice_ioctl, /* <--- or just ioctl? */ .d_name =3D "yourdevice", }; Perhaps you could ask on freebsd-hackers@ list instead? > where's the problem? -cpghost. --=20 Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 24 14:40:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EC3D1065675 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 14:40:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: from relay2.tomsk.ru (relay2.tomsk.ru [212.73.124.8]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 502C08FC0C for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 14:40:04 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: by clamd daemon 0.93.1 for FreeBSD at relay2.tomsk.ru Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (account sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru [212.73.125.240] verified) by relay2.tomsk.ru (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.1.13) with ESMTPSA id 15207528 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 20:40:03 +0600 Received: from admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (sudakov@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oBOEe3mH030595 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 20:40:03 +0600 (OMST) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) Received: (from sudakov@localhost) by admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id oBOEe3pA030594 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 20:40:03 +0600 (OMST) (envelope-from vas@mpeks.tomsk.su) X-Authentication-Warning: admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru: sudakov set sender to vas@mpeks.tomsk.su using -f Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 20:40:03 +0600 From: Victor Sudakov To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101224144002.GB30333@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> Mail-Followup-To: Victor Sudakov , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20101223172752.GA8539@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20101223201249.ea7648aa.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101223191443.GA24653@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20101223205456.21ddbe27.freebsd@edvax.de> <44zkrws0xx.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20101224033427.GD16472@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20101224083304.2458afe8@gumby.homeunix.com> <20101224092901.GB23384@admin.sibptus.tomsk.ru> <20101224121625.011c8fef@gumby.homeunix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20101224121625.011c8fef@gumby.homeunix.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Organization: AO "Svyaztransneft", SibPTUS X-PGP-Key: http://www.livejournal.com/pubkey.bml?user=victor_sudakov X-PGP-Fingerprint: 10E3 1171 1273 E007 C2E9 3532 0DA4 F259 9B5E C634 Subject: Re: rc.d and environment variables X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 14:40:06 -0000 RW wrote: > > > > > > I'm not sure this will work. The initial question was about > > > > > > how to obtain an environmental variable. If the rc.d script > > > > > > of svnserve sources /etc/rc.conf and/or /etc/rc.conf.local, > > > > > > it is okay, > > > > > > > > > > They do. rc.d scripts all start by sucking in rc.subr, which in > > > > > turn pulls in the rc.conf files. > > > > > > > > So how do I make the /usr/local/etc/rc.d/svnserve script suck in > > > > KRB5_KTNAME for the "svn" user from the rc.conf* files? > > > > > > Just export it from rc.conf > > > > If exported from rc.conf, it will affect all daemons. I need to set it > > only for svnserve or for the svn user (which is equivalent in my > > case). > > [ "$name" = "svnserve" ] && export KRB5_KTNAME="/home/svn/svn.keytab" This looks really ugly. A thorough examination of /etc/rc.subr shows that a startup script sources a certain /etc/rc.conf.d/"$_name". Maybe I should try to place "export KRB5_KTNAME=/home/svn/svn.keytab" there. At least /etc/rc.conf.d/svnserve will be sourced only once at svnserve startup, and not hundreds of times like rc.conf. But anyway, I don't like the idea of placing commands (not variables) in /etc/rc.conf* There should be support for the rc.d framework to assign limits, environment variables and login classes. -- Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN sip:sudakov@sibptus.tomsk.ru From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 24 14:47:26 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F5BD1065670 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 14:47:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hedayati.mo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 205AF8FC12 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 14:47:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so6807629wwf.31 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 06:47:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=hTAPNKLXvbKjuccV52QZAgASpgrQAgPaEA2njMTudqg=; b=pgwYQWmk9E2rJs3Pwk+pcPo0sq83YetWMhnWo1H1hM2BnnHlGrd5Ea6MHR13WLLw04 q5WjVBWsgPG4o1mjSXBNO025fJA9qQ0E6Xcph48e0DZTcFTWy+R5LqdcIaN0bDbaL5CA GFXDoDumkAaukl36fNFy1Yiq2Y8L+rCJiTDRM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=QCHOgdWm7lru6x96BFv1C/PscEXTwcguiWWirVXehtPpACpFu9JxnFlM+CirEGujXQ qKsC2ayLJdM4tNEXNphmkEOHU5wYHtCaWcTImqvAJwTNIutA5Xwi0+AFAZ0mYyw7u2QX 1JiRF7WPJhqQo68pPi+2XEj91gdd4yJLRkVqE= Received: by 10.227.146.145 with SMTP id h17mr5768703wbv.60.1293202044674; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 06:47:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.143.202 with HTTP; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 06:46:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Mohammad Hedayati Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 18:16:44 +0330 Message-ID: To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: Re: Inappropriate ioctl for device X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 14:47:26 -0000 On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 6:00 PM, C. P. Ghost wrote: > On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Mohammad Hedayati > wrote: > > I'm writing a simple char device. So far everything went so good > > (read/write), but here I'm going to add support for ioctl. > > > > int > > ioctl(struct cdev *dev, u_long cmd, caddr_t data, int flags, struct > thread *td) > > { > > int error = 0; > > uprintf("Here...\n"); > > return(error); > > } > > and I'm calling it here: > > > > len = ioctl(cd, 0); > > perror("ioctl"); > > > > but when runnig it says: > > > > ioctl: Inappropriate ioctl for device > > Just a wild guess: are you sure you've hooked up your > ioctl() function to the struct cdevsw, i.e. something > like this? > > static struct cdevsw yourdevice_cdevsw = { > .d_version = D_VERSION, > .d_read = yourdevice_read, > .d_write = yourdevice_write, > .d_ioctl = yourdevice_ioctl, /* <--- or just ioctl? */ > .d_name = "yourdevice", > }; > > Perhaps you could ask on freebsd-hackers@ list instead? > > > where's the problem? > > -cpghost. > > -- > Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ > Yes, I did. Thanks! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 24 18:54:04 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74EAA106566C for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 18:54:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jonc@chen.org.nz) Received: from mail-pz0-f54.google.com (mail-pz0-f54.google.com [209.85.210.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 544038FC16 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 18:54:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk32 with SMTP id 32so1891441pzk.13 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 10:54:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.179.7 with SMTP id b7mr7720934wff.147.1293216842535; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 10:54:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (118-93-184-18.dsl.dyn.ihug.co.nz [118.93.184.18]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x35sm12706208wfd.13.2010.12.24.10.53.58 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 24 Dec 2010 10:54:00 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 07:53:55 +1300 From: Jonathan Chen To: Chris Brennan Message-ID: <20101224185355.GA2225@osiris.chen.org.nz> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: fetching mail (but not fetchmail) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 18:54:04 -0000 On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:27:32PM -0500, Chris Brennan wrote: > Bit of an odd question. But I will try. Is it possible to set up some > mechanism (in freebsd or maybe gentoo (doesn't matter to me)) to pop/imap > into my mail location and download everything as storage and then I imap to > my local machine to read my mail. I realize I can pop/imap directly into my > mail, the goal of this exorcise is to store my mail on one of my local > servers and not my windows machine which can change at a moment's notice. (I > just don't like the idea of permanent/long-term storage in Windows :/ ) I've got a fetchmail + procmail combination, where fetchmail retrieves it from a remote POP3 server and procmail is the local MDA which converts it to Maildir format (which can be read by my local IMAP server). My ~/.fetchmailrc looks like this: poll pop3.vodafone.co.nz protocol pop3 username "myusername" password "mypassword" mda /usr/local/bin/procmail sslproto "" And ~/.procmailrc looks like: # # # Trailing / for Maildir MAILDIR=$HOME/Maildir/ DEFAULT=$HOME/Maildir/ ... Hope that helps. -- Jonathan Chen ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Don't worry about avoiding temptation, as you grow older, it starts avoiding you. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 24 19:14:14 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5D52106566B for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 19:14:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F0C78FC14 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 19:14:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PWD5g-0001mm-Fg for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 20:14:12 +0100 Received: from ip72-210-73-134.mc.at.cox.net ([72.210.73.134]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 20:14:12 +0100 Received: from jvk-list by ip72-210-73-134.mc.at.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 20:14:12 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Joe Kraft Followup-To: gmane.os.freebsd.questions Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 14:14 -0500 Lines: 67 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip72-210-73-134.mc.at.cox.net User-Agent: KNode/4.4.7 Subject: cpio misunderstanding? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 19:14:14 -0000 Let me state a couple of given's up front: 1) I would post this on a FreeSBIE list if I could find one. 2) I think the issue I have right now is not understanding completely the limitations of cpio. My problem is that when building the file system to use for making the iso cpio fails when copying some of the files saying "Operation not permitted". These are some of the files fairly important to the operating system like libexec/ld-elf.so.1 and lib/libc.so.7. I don't see any reason for copying the other 16,540 files and failing on these 22 important files. Can anyone point me in the right direction for a better understanding of what's going on, or even just call me an idiot and tell me the simple thing I've missed? Either will be appreciated. Joe.
I'm using 8.1-STABLE FreeBSD 8.1-STABLE #2, and freesbie-2.0.20070710 from ports. I've updated the kernel conf file to match GENERIC, with the following lines from the original FreeSBIE kernel added at the end: device bktr options IPFIREWALL options IPFIREWALL_VERBOSE options IPFIREWALL_DEFAULT_TO_ACCEPT device pf device pflog device pfsync options IPSTEALTH options IPDIVERT options GEOM_UZIP options GEOM_LABEL options VESA options SC_PIXEL_MODE The system seems to build fine but hits a snag in this section of the script: # If FILE_LIST isn't defined... if [ -z "${FILE_LIST:-}" ]; then # then copy the whole filesystem find . -print -depth | cpio -dump -l -v ${CLONEDIR} >> ${LOGFILE} 2>&1 else # else pass it to cpio ... more code to dump filenames from ${FILE_LIST} to cpio ... fi If I try to run it manually on one of the files that fails, I get this: slug# echo "/usr/local/freesbie-fs/libexec/ld-elf.so.1" | cpio -dump -l -v /usr/local/freesbie-clone /usr/local/freesbie-clone/usr/local/freesbie-fs/libexec/ld-elf.so.1 cpio: Can't create '/usr/local/freesbie-clone/usr/local/freesbie- fs/libexec/ld-elf.so.1': Operation not permitted 0 blocks I can use cp to copy the file, so I don't understand what's going on here. Does anyone have any ideas?
From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 24 20:40:50 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B0921065670 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 20:40:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ken@mthelicon.com) Received: from hercules.mthelicon.com (unknown [IPv6:2001:49f0:2023::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 381018FC08 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 20:40:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from feathers.peganest.com ([89.193.189.136]) (authenticated bits=0) by hercules.mthelicon.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oBOKej2K058653 for ; Fri, 24 Dec 2010 20:40:46 GMT (envelope-from ken@mthelicon.com) From: Pegasus Mc Cleaft Organization: Feathers To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 20:42:20 +0000 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/9.0-CURRENT; KDE/4.5.4; amd64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201012242042.21257.ken@mthelicon.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=15.0 tests=BAYES_00,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on hercules.mthelicon.com Subject: Re: cpio misunderstanding? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 20:40:50 -0000 > If I try to run it manually on one of the files that fails, I get this: > > slug# echo "/usr/local/freesbie-fs/libexec/ld-elf.so.1" | cpio -dump -l -v > /usr/local/freesbie-clone > > /usr/local/freesbie-clone/usr/local/freesbie-fs/libexec/ld-elf.so.1 > > cpio: Can't create '/usr/local/freesbie-clone/usr/local/freesbie- > fs/libexec/ld-elf.so.1': Operation not permitted > 0 blocks > > > I can use cp to copy the file, so I don't understand what's going on here. > Does anyone have any ideas? I don't know if this is your problem, but whenever I see that "Operation not permitted" error I start to suspect file flags. You might want to check for extra flags put on the source file or destination directory and see if anything weird had been set on it. You can look at the flags with the command "ls -lao". You may also want to do a "man chflags" and read the manual page there. ~Peg From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 25 00:57:58 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A1A7106566B for ; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 00:57:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBA0C8FC17 for ; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 00:57:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PWISH-0003US-4v for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 01:57:53 +0100 Received: from ip72-210-73-134.mc.at.cox.net ([72.210.73.134]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 01:57:53 +0100 Received: from jvk-list by ip72-210-73-134.mc.at.cox.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 01:57:53 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Joe Kraft Followup-To: gmane.os.freebsd.questions Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 19:57:41 -0500 Lines: 41 Message-ID: References: <201012242042.21257.ken@mthelicon.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: ip72-210-73-134.mc.at.cox.net User-Agent: KNode/4.4.7 Subject: Re: cpio misunderstanding? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 00:57:58 -0000 Pegasus Mc Cleaft wrote: >> If I try to run it manually on one of the files that fails, I get this: >> >> slug# echo "/usr/local/freesbie-fs/libexec/ld-elf.so.1" | cpio -dump -l >> -v /usr/local/freesbie-clone >> >> /usr/local/freesbie-clone/usr/local/freesbie-fs/libexec/ld-elf.so.1 >> >> cpio: Can't create '/usr/local/freesbie-clone/usr/local/freesbie- >> fs/libexec/ld-elf.so.1': Operation not permitted >> 0 blocks >> >> >> I can use cp to copy the file, so I don't understand what's going on >> here. Does anyone have any ideas? > > I don't know if this is your problem, but whenever I see that "Operation > not permitted" error I start to suspect file flags. You might want to > check for extra flags put on the source file or destination directory and > see if anything weird had been set on it. > > You can look at the flags with the command "ls -lao". You may also want > to do a "man chflags" and read the manual page there. > OK, now I know what's going on. I just don't know why. The immutable flag was set on all these files, if you clear it cpio will happily copy them to the new directory. I'm guessing it's a change in how the installation copies the files with the schg intact, I ran into a discussion about that from 2008. The original FreeSBIE scripts were based on FBSD 6.2 and maybe never ran into this issue. I don't quite get why this works this way though. I understand the immutable flag will keep the file itself from being changed, deleted or moved. But I don't see in any documentation that the immutable flag will not allow a file to be copied. I did note that when using the 'cp' command it cleared the immutable bit on the new file instead of keeping it, but at least it makes the copy. Joe. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 25 04:08:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C477C106564A for ; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 04:08:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 865198FC0C for ; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 04:08:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-37-207.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.37.207]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF7733D57E; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 05:07:48 +0100 (CET) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id oBP47mrV001945; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 05:07:48 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 05:07:48 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Joe Kraft Message-Id: <20101225050748.7b75781c.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <201012242042.21257.ken@mthelicon.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cpio misunderstanding? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 04:08:09 -0000 On Fri, 24 Dec 2010 19:57:41 -0500, Joe Kraft wrote: > I don't quite get why this works this way though. I understand the > immutable flag will keep the file itself from being changed, deleted or > moved. But I don't see in any documentation that the immutable flag will > not allow a file to be copied. It *may* have to do something with the updating of the access time (atime) of a file by the cpio program? > I did note that when using the 'cp' command > it cleared the immutable bit on the new file instead of keeping it, but at > least it makes the copy. The schg flag has to be set on the destination file manually. It won't be copied by the cp command. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 25 08:40:41 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02949106566C for ; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 08:40:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B44308FC17 for ; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 08:40:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [88.217.20.112] (helo=current.Sisis.de) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PWPg6-0005VQ-DH for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 09:40:38 +0100 Received: from current.Sisis.de (current [127.0.0.1]) by current.Sisis.de (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id oBP8ei6w002267 for ; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 09:40:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by current.Sisis.de (8.14.3/8.14.3/Submit) id oBP8eixa002266 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 09:40:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: current.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 09:40:43 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101225084043.GA2243@current.Sisis.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.19 (2009-01-05) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Originating-IP: 88.217.20.112 Subject: request Skype.com(TM) for a native version of Skype for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 08:40:41 -0000 Hello, Please support the request by sending ME TOO in the topic: http://forum.skype.com/index.php?showtopic=563851 Thanks matthias -- Matthias Apitz t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 25 09:12:12 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71BFC106566B for ; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 09:12:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 024AC8FC17 for ; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 09:12:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so7217628wwf.31 for ; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 01:12:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:date:from:to:subject :message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XXni310wRnycx/NaaxzhY7InIxcg0pEdtwb9PFEGQn4=; b=EY5Ih9Cid3XvwfQBSOmUqJMf5zyxeBVkiNBGRFt2ME95DyeY+dc2JmyC+4uJ67TaVm hMyO5xEVVRCMyWJJvM/0rDR8Om0awwbwu/vYfZWxt/Z6S/5og5f83zx7xO0O7ssz9hyM SPg+gxNcm9e/Fc01pIdEHzV6TsBm0HbvDF8Hw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=PJAAaxHGhGxDLxbeSi71Lj07r8UhqJW8G9OlUNLSTfejEoHn8d/HKv9JrsEgR+rm61 t5d72L9AjM8AJ1U0E02ByiYklTbMfjCJL2iug1OcZ0Gt+0+lJKjHPudQeCCgUeddwNCU M2UkgWklHb1OxAD9JiFTVpBuhsowjmwanW3LQ= Received: by 10.227.183.203 with SMTP id ch11mr6152747wbb.214.1293268330941; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 01:12:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 11sm6761960wbj.7.2010.12.25.01.12.09 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 25 Dec 2010 01:12:09 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 09:12:07 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20101225091207.54248d4e@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: References: <4D1433F0.9@infracaninophile.co.uk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.22.1; i386-portbld-freebsd8.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: fetching mail (but not fetchmail) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 09:12:12 -0000 On Fri, 24 Dec 2010 00:33:42 -0600 David Kelly wrote: > > Mail.app, Outlook, or Firefox. But in doing this you are not giving > up the ability to do mail on your console. > ... > When using maildir format both mutt and dovecot can operate out of > the same mail repository at the same time. mutt and [al]pine support imap, and dovecot works more efficiently if you don't modify, or deliver to, the mail store without going through imap or deliver. BTW no-one has mentioned getmail. getmail can deliver to an mda or maildir and pipe though spam/virus filters itself. In combination with the sieve support in dovecot deliver you can drop procmail altogether. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 25 09:56:15 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CC5E106566C for ; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 09:56:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from xnooby@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qw0-f54.google.com (mail-qw0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 350768FC0C for ; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 09:56:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: by qwj9 with SMTP id 9so7268220qwj.13 for ; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 01:56:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; bh=JBLz8Oz8qS+x5vG2rNtKsehanWGgsYTWelPe52zP0Gk=; b=v1uSwbPStGYEr71YFvde/MNAmha2q364zhY45k2Br8VU0z3qPzZu2TmQbCWXnr6rn6 1r67gTeeTk132QSB+8j7g4OPSihrTwb5wjKPTHCyOOlJnwV7oySzcusW2xNu6E+rgAT3 ITNYsyz+nIMWgHa7o4GakMK5vUeu4bBItVrdw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=cSrpa73cAkUI9aDpXr9ShhoB3RZ+72b5lAuXG5QyI+00h8C7YAb+uhPWvnb4m+UzEk +AoFi9KzvzjLWlAS576jRHAg42QlCnXVpgkjbp/DGIntXjiCbse1RmzF/fMjOFhjE58g Cf+LsYN3Yqy2jnkDtQ5AxuewkXeD+jqai09UA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.74.65 with SMTP id t1mr9220662qcj.10.1293270974347; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 01:56:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.229.221.213 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 01:56:14 -0800 (PST) Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 04:56:14 -0500 Message-ID: From: Xn Nooby To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Can FreeBSD utilize VT/HVM ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 09:56:15 -0000 I have a new computer that has VT (Virtualization Technology), so I am able to virtualize other OS's when running Linux and their KVM. Does FreeBSD have a method of using VT to virtualize other OS's? Jails are really cool, especially since they do not need VT - but I was wondering if there was an advantage to having VT when running FreeBSD. Or would the VT be more-or -less unused with FreeBSD? I sometimes experiment with different OS's, that is why I am interested in virtualizing them. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 25 10:12:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDC2C106566C for ; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 10:12:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bruce@cran.org.uk) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (muon.cran.org.uk [IPv6:2a01:348:0:15:5d59:5c40:0:1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35A558FC08 for ; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 10:12:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from muon.cran.org.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E2BE72B2; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 10:12:01 +0000 (GMT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from :to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=mail; bh=uyNo5vN0O2jS BIgYCFl6zZxmjHM=; b=UOJH/UadEzPmoYAxebwwhpZUZH7XuKimhT2cxZ4rNMrs ffpBohW6yyyX5cVMoQ8OdOIYyXn8/yu0FqOQhJRl+PDXemZLeEKvdBywA/ohrek5 IDZ35E+qexZzIB9Q0vVpyliQWdtxdymmURM26fBYYdxI4qkomgK7A/aEIRdf86Y= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=cran.org.uk; h=date:from:to :cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=mail; b=NGJysY A3ElK5E9bl5dc9hke7XtgWKA2lEJ2glBcjo1AcSX8ysdollgujtrVQaJ0Hpq2L6d plaf/6OY8F+TOK7U5EWuLFEQzi00f4FvG9txDq8quyVAeQt5Lw/X419X58lxBs0/ Xk/8hZS3fQnu+LDQ76NWQlew4DYmPDnoF55+k= Received: from unknown (client-86-27-40-45.glfd.adsl.virginmedia.com [86.27.40.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by muon.cran.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 30936E72B1; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 10:12:01 +0000 (GMT) Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 10:11:56 +0000 From: Bruce Cran To: Xn Nooby Message-ID: <20101225101156.00001458@unknown> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.16.0; i586-pc-mingw32msvc) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Can FreeBSD utilize VT/HVM ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 10:12:03 -0000 On Sat, 25 Dec 2010 04:56:14 -0500 Xn Nooby wrote: > I have a new computer that has VT (Virtualization Technology), so I am > able to virtualize other OS's when running Linux and their KVM. Does > FreeBSD have a method of using VT to virtualize other OS's? Jails are > really cool, especially since they do not need VT - but I was > wondering if there was an advantage to having VT when running FreeBSD. > > Or would the VT be more-or -less unused with FreeBSD? emulators/virtualbox-ose can make use of it. -- Bruce Cran From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 25 12:38:10 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0EDA1065672 for ; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 12:38:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from spamrefuse@yahoo.com) Received: from web33303.mail.mud.yahoo.com (web33303.mail.mud.yahoo.com [68.142.206.118]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8AA5B8FC14 for ; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 12:38:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 22145 invoked by uid 60001); 25 Dec 2010 12:38:08 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1293280688; bh=HBF1tmM2imHwCq43CcH8DiXMplU0SztrIStVHO9n4Kw=; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=AcwfW55ykLJjqIgH+JVKjtDBKen4bNJ9JGSZhCubhEvBnHz5P2uAlInjEf1Q4fYI9BF3n1hw6HNvyjCzQiAZHQS2m55vhNH9kVIAcsjRMZ/zlDY3wawc4PYC4yTEv7cTwRDqkRx+fgCKN5HdV2O47VlRL0KS1GtZCBqzIACMsDQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=O67zOwDslHmG43une/fnZjv0flsYCjHQjSC/GPi609qrrkijrxLW+v/hNWj3LbAd3/ts0nUn0D7boAks60DrJllJGmb+62JL0xji1Y0Zhk3PCIdwPg7EwdT7lzlw+4Xm2pIPLPdpG2hslpZcGiT6u8R964BQklXylp6gaTgVNxA=; Message-ID: <876362.21296.qm@web33303.mail.mud.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: DM4DM0oVM1m0Bhh9TOL9DnCJGIyhkUZROijADmb7giLLUaN bJwqgXOr.Y00K3giVHpcZSVlsiLjVXxjRSZFkfA4l1.LA0V3O.FyKLAvtZdv fZrdarMa1hksYE0v9TYfETQlz2QVFxX8FVYvFrsFv0cf_XB_Perh6mRZDAl5 L4K9rP74gAi5XdeBisq7n.CDmIe4j39Ho6lAQdpY7h3x9syS2EI60Ud8DkPK c75eQRl4SwfMCoBn22vDeNq2Sqy05tuDYSht99eVjfNdC3n2rCt2qAF488S_ wjX.8t9GtrKJB5_LXMOGZd6JEcYMiqEoG7hfyFA7J4_ElOjSPD2L.XfkwLsZ .fKTk9RGZZUYKAa45BiOWrrT20z30BqTY.yc2Tfxn1ZXL5BGW7Bx_Qo.CYfT E38LIHXcpPJ.O Received: from [111.118.62.73] by web33303.mail.mud.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 04:38:08 PST X-Mailer: YahooMailRC/553 YahooMailWebService/0.8.107.285259 Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 04:38:08 -0800 (PST) From: Rob To: FreeBSD questions MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: kernel config file according to config(5): inconsistent ? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 12:38:10 -0000 Hi, I read the guidelines in the man pages of config(5) on how to make a customized kernel config file: nooption name [, name [...]] nooptions name [, name [...]] Remove the specified kernel options from the list of previously defined options. This directive can be used to cancel the effects of option or options directives in files included using include. So I put following in my MYKERNEL config file: include GENERIC nocpu I486_CPU nocpu I586_CPU ident MYKERNEL nomakeoptions DEBUG nooptions MD_ROOT nooptions NFSCLIENT , NFSSERVER , NFSLOCKD , NFS_ROOT nooptions MSDOSFS , CD9660 nooptions PROCFS , PSEUDOFS The comma separated items seemed to cause an error when I do the buildkernel. If I remove the commas and make a 'nooptions' per item, then it is OK. Something seems to be inconsistent here, right? Same inconsistency for "nodevices" with the syntax in the manpages and the real config file.... Rob. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 25 14:56:09 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CC80106567A for ; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 14:56:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-wy0-f182.google.com (mail-wy0-f182.google.com [74.125.82.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F28C08FC1D for ; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 14:56:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wyf19 with SMTP id 19so7467080wyf.13 for ; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 06:56:07 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.147.129 with SMTP id l1mr6294404wbv.26.1293288967081; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 06:56:07 -0800 (PST) Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.227.145.133 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 06:56:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101225084043.GA2243@current.Sisis.de> References: <20101225084043.GA2243@current.Sisis.de> Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 09:56:07 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: J8QLPf7xPI35CAHcgxFAGnPXlXU Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: Matthias Apitz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: request Skype.com(TM) for a native version of Skype for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 14:56:09 -0000 On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 3:40 AM, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > Hello, > > Please support the request by sending ME TOO in the topic: > http://forum.skype.com/index.php?showtopic=3D563851 > Thanks > Done. > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0matthias > -- > Matthias Apitz > t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 > e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 25 16:57:03 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62521106564A for ; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 16:57:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aimass@yabarana.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04E7C8FC0C for ; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 16:57:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwf26 with SMTP id 26so7368049wwf.31 for ; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 08:57:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.156.9 with SMTP id u9mr6320511wbw.142.1293296221541; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 08:57:01 -0800 (PST) Sender: aimass@yabarana.com Received: by 10.227.145.133 with HTTP; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 08:57:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20101225084043.GA2243@current.Sisis.de> References: <20101225084043.GA2243@current.Sisis.de> Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 11:57:01 -0500 X-Google-Sender-Auth: tmFIxPUH2OnBKGZFt0EDxR17lzY Message-ID: From: Alejandro Imass To: Matthias Apitz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: request Skype.com(TM) for a native version of Skype for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 16:57:03 -0000 On Sat, Dec 25, 2010 at 3:40 AM, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > Hello, > > Please support the request by sending ME TOO in the topic: > http://forum.skype.com/index.php?showtopic=3D563851 > Thanks > These are older but related: http://forum.skype.com/index.php?showtopic=3D75963&view=3D&hl=3Dfreebsd&fro= msearch=3D1 http://forum.skype.com/index.php?showtopic=3D89360&view=3D&hl=3Dfreebsd&fro= msearch=3D1 http://forum.skype.com/index.php?showtopic=3D102238&view=3D&hl=3Dfreebsd&fr= omsearch=3D1 Take a look at my last post on that forum. It seems that Skype is now using PulseAudio (only?) and that should be a step closer to a native FBSD client. > =A0 =A0 =A0 =A0matthias > -- > Matthias Apitz > t +49-89-61308 351 - f +49-89-61308 399 - m +49-170-4527211 > e - w http://www.unixarea.de/ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.o= rg" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 25 18:37:19 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D56E3106564A for ; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 18:37:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from elon@emmi.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de) Received: from emmi.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de (emmi.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de [130.149.58.146]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 686028FC08 for ; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 18:37:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from emmi.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de (localhost.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de [127.0.0.1]) by emmi.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oBPIbHkZ008947; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 19:37:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from elon@emmi.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de) Received: (from elon@localhost) by emmi.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id oBPIbG11008946; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 19:37:16 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from elon) Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 19:37:16 +0100 From: Leon =?iso-8859-15?Q?Me=DFner?= To: Robert Boyer Message-ID: <20101225183716.GB94883@emmi.physik-pool.tu-berlin.de> Mail-Followup-To: Robert Boyer , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <7C86788D-9A22-479C-AF2B-5A7025F371E2@mac.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7C86788D-9A22-479C-AF2B-5A7025F371E2@mac.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SAS HBA card for freebsd? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 18:37:19 -0000 On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 10:32:24PM -0500, Robert Boyer wrote: > I need a SAS controller that has preferably 8 ports (two four channel) connections per card. I don't mind decent buying a RAID card but really really desire it to be configurable in HBA mode vs. RAID or JBOD with RAID signatures. There are plenty of HBA only cards that would be suitable but I can find none that seem to fit the bill in terms of FreeBSD. I have seen a couple of cheap RAID cards recommended but cannot seem to get a definitive answer of whether they are actually configurable as plain old disks (HBA mode) vs JBOD w/ RAID signature. > > Anybody using a reasonably priced card that fits the bill? Not yet, but were planning to get the LSI 9200. The driver is prob. comming in 8.2 if i interpret the TODO list correctly. If you are fine with SAS version 1 there are lots of good supported RAID-cards that can work in JBOD mode. chario, Leon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 25 20:56:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 676E6106564A for ; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 20:56:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fidaj@ukr.net) Received: from fsm1.ukr.net (fsm1.ukr.net [195.214.192.23]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 253338FC12 for ; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 20:56:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 59-38-132-95.pool.ukrtel.net ([95.132.38.59] helo=localhost) by fsm1.ukr.net with esmtps ID 1PWatJ-0005tG-VZ ; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 22:39:02 +0200 Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 22:39:00 +0200 From: Ivan Klymenko To: Matthias Apitz Message-ID: <20101225223900.2e2556f6@ukr.net> In-Reply-To: <20101225084043.GA2243@current.Sisis.de> References: <20101225084043.GA2243@current.Sisis.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.8 (GTK+ 2.22.1; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: request Skype.com(TM) for a native version of Skype for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 20:56:02 -0000 =D0=92 Sat, 25 Dec 2010 09:40:43 +0100 Matthias Apitz =D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=88=D0=B5=D1=82: >=20 > Hello, >=20 > Please support the request by sending ME TOO in the topic: > http://forum.skype.com/index.php?showtopic=3D563851 > Thanks >=20 > matthias Done. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 25 23:23:53 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58BB81065672 for ; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 23:23:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lenzi.sergio@gmail.com) Received: from mail-gy0-f182.google.com (mail-gy0-f182.google.com [209.85.160.182]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C1278FC0A for ; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 23:23:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gyf3 with SMTP id 3so3569191gyf.13 for ; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 15:23:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:from:to:in-reply-to :references:content-type:date:message-id:mime-version:x-mailer; bh=cadfMbyg2F+OfUlyOC9I2T1bxh2MrrM3LFfObuevbKU=; b=Clq8HDf3BRIcWYlWf+mS9oMraw21YGnczLxK1Cp/tGjXqf3FeqHzlHOsfXZYus0eXZ pQxUiaroYz1j9KbD4o3tDqnVEYyfI6NFXDcNaEOOWDv+dh8FoRSGObe9aHvqObXY6oSE rK9lohtncqmH6X2WWSSzYcNMzxrdaSON6BL0w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:from:to:in-reply-to:references:content-type:date:message-id :mime-version:x-mailer; b=AgEB0LfOm09or6MvU5dW6vlgjoB7EPGVy8AF0985J4t8HN2K3N4MkRi8P9be9zf2bx ZPWsUSPbFHFJVBCgvMOR9xFrj/5fkP2ILS1fVhgXjcNpoX9LXPqlksd7nxH3WVl3BN21 evNlr+oK2QSanq80sjBo1cX6eo2DGiUmISo58= Received: by 10.90.28.3 with SMTP id b3mr3712398agb.185.1293319430979; Sat, 25 Dec 2010 15:23:50 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.6.230] ([201.21.166.97]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b19sm6160210ana.7.2010.12.25.15.23.49 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 25 Dec 2010 15:23:50 -0800 (PST) From: Sergio de Almeida Lenzi To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <4D1024BC.3060208@forethought.net> References: <20101203043805.GB8149@comcast.net> <20101203191339.61205ccb.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101204042952.0ac21e45.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101204055748.GA46559@comcast.net> <20101208083926.4c992c44.freebsd@edvax.de> <20101208094223.GD11485@comcast.net> <20101221020545.e45981ef.freebsd@edvax.de> <4D1024BC.3060208@forethought.net> Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 21:23:46 -0200 Message-ID: <1293319426.20051.4.camel@z6000.lenzinote> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.5 Subject: sys671 port X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Dec 2010 23:23:53 -0000 Hello... Christmas gift I have a notebook with the sis chipset and FreeBSD had no xorg driver for it. After googling a lot I found a driver that, after some fixes, it works... the port is here ====> http://dist64.k1.com.br/Downloads/sis671.tar.gz I tested in amd64 and i386 version of FreeBSD 8.1 and 9.0 and it works.. there is support for 2D only... and in the laptop it shows 1280x800 24bits... Enjoy.