Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2011 04:10:50 -0400 From: Sahil Tandon <sahil@FreeBSD.org> To: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, ohauer@FreeBSD.org, portmgr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: USERS/GROUPS in bsd.port.mk [was: FreeBSD Port: postfix-2.8.4, 1] Message-ID: <20110807081049.GA735@magic.hamla.org> In-Reply-To: <20110803040516.GD1447@magic.hamla.org> References: <4E368625.7010805@quip.cz> <4E370ADA.9060902@FreeBSD.org> <4E371284.5010806@quip.cz> <4E371B3B.7070806@FreeBSD.org> <4E3722DE.6050206@gmx.de> <20110802010139.GA981@magic.hamla.org> <4E37F71D.7070502@quip.cz> <20110803040516.GD1447@magic.hamla.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 00:05:16 -0400, Sahil Tandon wrote: > [ adding portmgr@ to the chain since we're in bpmk territory] > > On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 15:09:49 +0200, Miroslav Lachman wrote: > > > Sahil Tandon wrote: > > >On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 00:04:14 +0200, olli hauer wrote: > > > > > >>No, you don't hit the limitation. It seems you really found a bug in > > >>the Framework! > > >> > > >> From the Framework code in bsd.port.mk existing groups should honored. > > > > > >Along those lines, what about using groupmod instead of usermod? > > >Perhaps due to my ignorance, it seems more straightforward and does not > > >require much sed-fu; I've attached a (probably incomplete) patch to > > >illustrate my thinking. I understand what I am suggesting could > > >introduce other problems, so please do not construe it as an as-is > > >suggestion, but rather something to stoke discussion. > > > > I tested your patch and it works for me. > > [ .. ] > > > Thank you for your time and working solution. I filed ports/159577 for portmgr review. -- Sahil Tandon <sahil@FreeBSD.org>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110807081049.GA735>