From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 17 04:40:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E95BD405; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 04:40:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edwin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5C9996E; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 04:40:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r1H4eAjF096007; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 04:40:10 GMT (envelope-from edwin@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from edwin@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r1H4eA2Y096003; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 04:40:10 GMT (envelope-from edwin) Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 04:40:10 GMT Message-Id: <201302170440.r1H4eA2Y096003@freefall.freebsd.org> To: edwin@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, office@FreeBSD.org From: edwin@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/176205: [editors/libreoffice] libreoffice won't build in UTF-8 environment X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 04:40:11 -0000 Synopsis: [editors/libreoffice] libreoffice won't build in UTF-8 environment Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->office Responsible-Changed-By: edwin Responsible-Changed-When: Sun Feb 17 04:40:10 UTC 2013 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to maintainer (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool) http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=176205 From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 17 13:34:18 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12E497F5 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 13:34:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yh0-x236.google.com (mail-yh0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::236]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3797894 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 13:34:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yh0-f54.google.com with SMTP id 29so825335yhr.13 for ; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 05:34:17 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type; bh=vZmtbDC9eWxES8d863GA0sxTJsFeJB2fMQkWl1H6Njo=; b=bhqxh4hpniuxKEqIQSX7kPCfzcu/gHPkNK6Tpo1qZVflZqGGFs6aFw0m40S+7Ok91c yrW7kKM2JyLRPB53WbE5gvPi3gERp0u3xfp8he9+fX9SrP//ztTNd1LG+MzzxuyaV9Ma 56mwaxbhePdm4m6UASHvVE6izSribVuP0GE98cB0BZQMffE7YjRnSJ1/mKRkiJFxiLal MCJzXboB5ePOTveIpQx9FWNhX8ZGOufKC0TutO+Biz2/nb1+QA6pXllqHfR9FwxuoATe 1shou270d0g3Xcq37XAby+M2LF8mg6B5r6H8qPEY6QczqGirGcsd2G+tF8vzciWrqDGW 2TBw== X-Received: by 10.236.69.99 with SMTP id m63mr14158250yhd.46.1361107676939; Sun, 17 Feb 2013 05:27:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from luna.wi.rr.com (cpe-184-58-138-79.wi.res.rr.com. [184.58.138.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j13sm57716173ani.19.2013.02.17.05.27.55 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 17 Feb 2013 05:27:55 -0800 (PST) From: ajtiM To: freebsd-office@freebsd.org Subject: libjawt.so Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 07:27:45 -0600 Message-ID: <1503636.C2NHosxWrI@luna.wi.rr.com> User-Agent: KMail/4.9.5 (FreeBSD/9.1-RELEASE; KDE/4.9.5; i386; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 13:34:18 -0000 editors/libreoffice: /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libofficebean.so misses libjawt.so I have Libreoffice 3.6.5_2 installed. I built it with clang on FreeBSD 9.1 Release and it works but it misses libjawt.so still. I have installed openjdk6 and libjawt.so is installed too. Thank you. Mitja ---------- http://www.redbubble.com/people/lumiwa From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 18 02:00:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF00E8C6 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 02:00:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sunpoet@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CCB434F for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 02:00:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r1I2002P053966 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 02:00:00 GMT (envelope-from sunpoet@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from sunpoet@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r1I200Xh053960 for office@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 02:00:00 GMT (envelope-from sunpoet) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 02:00:00 GMT From: Sunpoet Po-Chuan Hsieh Message-Id: <201302180200.r1I200Xh053960@freefall.freebsd.org> To: office@FreeBSD.org Subject: Office Scout Weekly Digest (2013/02/18 02:00:00) X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 02:00:01 -0000 ____ _______ ____ __ / __ \/ _/ _(_)______ / __/______ __ __/ /_ / /_/ / _/ _/ / __/ -_) _\ \/ __/ _ \/ // / __/ \____/_//_//_/\__/\__/ /___/\__/\___/\_,_/\__/ _ __ __ __ ___ _ __ | | _ / /__ ___ / /__ / /_ __ / _ \(_)__ ____ ___ / /_ | |/ |/ / -_) -_) _// / // / / // / / _ \/ -_|_- Delivered-To: freebsd-office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF73021A for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:06:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0144E31 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:06:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r1IB6nDo061639 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:06:49 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r1IB6noc061637 for freebsd-office@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:06:49 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:06:49 GMT Message-Id: <201302181106.r1IB6noc061637@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: freebsd-office@FreeBSD.org Subject: Current problem reports assigned to freebsd-office@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:06:49 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o ports/175064 office editors/libreoffice fails to compile o ports/174685 office New version of devel/icu crashed a lot of applications f ports/174618 office devel/icu error: in blender, /usr/local/lib/libboost_l f ports/173575 office Fix devel/boost-python-libs with python-3.2 o ports/171899 office editors/openoffice-3-devel: Openoffice 3.4.1 build fai f ports/171523 office [PATCH] devel/boost-libs: Allow building using Clang, 6 problems total. From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 18 11:07:43 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D08CD4F2 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:07:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA63AEE5 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:07:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r1IB7hCi062734 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:07:43 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r1IB7hbC062732 for office@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:07:43 GMT (envelope-from owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:07:43 GMT Message-Id: <201302181107.r1IB7hbC062732@freefall.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: gnats set sender to owner-bugmaster@FreeBSD.org using -f From: FreeBSD bugmaster To: office@FreeBSD.org Subject: Current problem reports assigned to office@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 11:07:43 -0000 Note: to view an individual PR, use: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number). The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users. These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental development code and obsolete releases. S Tracker Resp. Description -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- o ports/176205 office editors/libreoffice: libreoffice won't build in UTF-8 o ports/176000 office textproc/clucene: Incomplete install if WRKDIRPREFIX c o ports/175814 office devel/boost-all cannot use libc++ o ports/175423 office german/hunspell does not build o ports/174589 office devel/icu: clang build of icu-50.1 broken o ports/174574 office [ERROR] cannot build editors/libreoffice with icu_50 o ports/174429 office [patch] add depends to editors/openoffice-3 o ports/174212 office editors/libreoffice: ERROR: error 65280 occurred while o ports/173965 office editors/libreoffice pkg_add error o ports/173945 office Update textproc/it-hyphen to version 2012.04.03 o ports/173943 office Update textproc/it-hunspell to version 2012.04.03 o ports/173690 office editors/openoffice-3 upgrade leaves symlink pointing t o ports/171588 office editors/libreoffice build error o ports/171178 office textproc/aspell does not recognize standard filters o ports/170760 office textproc/hunspell: fails to detect /usr/local/include/ o ports/170051 office devel/icu fails on test stage when built with clang 3. o ports/168234 office [patch] editors/openoffice-3 fails to build on FreeBSD o ports/167641 office editors/libreoffice: o ports/167441 office editors/libreoffice - Unable to print o ports/167400 office editors/libreoffice 3-5.2.2 version ID - 350m 1 (Buil o ports/167309 office editors/libreoffice: Unable to configure printers on L o ports/164965 office editors/openoffice.org-3 fails to build in moz, nss, a o ports/162780 office editors/libreoffice without GUI o ports/162350 office ports/editors/openoffice.org-3 spawns a lawine of gmak o ports/161789 office editors/openoffice.org-3: compilations fails in module o ports/154674 office Build of editors/openoffice-3 3.0 fails o ports/154086 office libsicui18n.a in devel/icu constains no symbols o ports/151884 office editors/openoffice.org-3-devel port misbehaviour o ports/148918 office [patch] editors/openoffice.org-3-devel/Makefile fixes o ports/143949 office editors/openoffice-3: system unzip pickiness unhelpful a ports/127496 office devel/icu 3.8.1_1 does not build when Danish locale is o ports/126083 office textproc/aspell core dumps 32 problems total. From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 18 20:03:50 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4D696FD for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:03:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from hammer.pct.niksun.com (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 906412E4; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:03:50 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <512288BB.1020303@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:02:03 -0500 From: Jung-uk Kim User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130128 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: ajtiM Subject: Re: libjawt.so References: <1503636.C2NHosxWrI@luna.wi.rr.com> In-Reply-To: <1503636.C2NHosxWrI@luna.wi.rr.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:03:50 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-02-17 08:27:45 -0500, ajtiM wrote: > editors/libreoffice: > /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libofficebean.so misses > libjawt.so > > I have Libreoffice 3.6.5_2 installed. I built it with clang on > FreeBSD 9.1 Release and it works but it misses libjawt.so still. I > have installed openjdk6 and libjawt.so is installed too. You don't need to worry about it. libofficebean.so is not needed for LibreOffice itself. It is only used by Java applications to interface with LibreOffice (via program/classes/officebean.jar). This API is called OOoBean and LibreOffice inherited it from OpenOffice.org (but it is not well maintained). http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/DevGuide/JavaBean/The_OOoBean_by_Example Jung-uk Kim -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRIoi7AAoJECXpabHZMqHOFtkH+gLn3ZIGNTLgvBaGqEOVEjFt sfijt7FguaBEbExknhZ/hvFWBz9J3euLa1Mg63gq5hQhCZSvl76xQxFdQWaXipgg DNZrZtcG+LgjXiyYgwARm64wcSAVRo0rz1vmJTfDGH2/jrmM5KB4vCX4TozbN9xq GbEGh5AXgh1tLlW4l+85RJ1HR0E6DavnVeBaFBNB/c2muwej080Dqb61//4YLOLN aAFbdqtX7BqeVb5OUMf9l9wtlxFmuF6nVs2tz6iFgIkcCLCM0JsIP67eP8iOdPFg 8HwGhA787I2CyvBkRRdCXel2+NIi2dMgbu0SKYWZS1rjhiGmDHqoR6y7kjTx9b8= =bJ2k -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 18 20:08:19 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66FA9779; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:08:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from hammer.pct.niksun.com (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED6E831C; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:08:18 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <512289C7.1070705@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:06:31 -0500 From: Jung-uk Kim User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130128 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: awarecons Subject: Re: editors/libreoffice ISSUE error: invalid preprocessing directive #definesHID_DLGIDX_SAVEINDEX References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: office@freebsd.org, ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:08:19 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-02-16 13:53:15 -0500, awarecons wrote: > Upgrade libreoffice-3.5.7_1 to 3.6.5_2 > > gcc 4.6.3: ... Please do not use non-default compilers to build LibreOffice unless it is absolutely necessary. We cannot support all possible combinations. Jung-uk Kim -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRIonHAAoJECXpabHZMqHOyoEIAITe6bHKYcHbskJcBpNkQ0uy y015OFpsmLZXS5yw4HrfbJRmggm3NBtWN+WuIEaa/q6VKwl84X1mJ4BGesZWq3QK C8W2KDoFtDMyXtNj2qA5CAmASI/1Sa0f+s6joqD9aoKe23qqXWkaoHau1gfAq3m5 N1WWs3ruCMJ1qFTrcjF8DxZsMf37txWyAFx9XMmLjIebOUuEkdB7qMcKkY6shG5n SfBzl2FrZAVEjBQYXxAXEDi9Y1d/sB5Ymc84KXXi5NsoXeUIbERJabeJ3jbYLBcA LWIQeNBWwsf2B+jv12Td21OuLL4x4jSgtMnjowzDfC7XwHo4HbHAKbQRs93FHIc= =Jkzb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 18 20:23:51 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9826BD7B; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:23:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from hammer.pct.niksun.com (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E2053EF; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:23:51 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <51228D6B.9040000@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:22:03 -0500 From: Jung-uk Kim User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130128 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: awarecons Subject: Re: editors/libreoffice ISSUE error: invalid preprocessing directive #definesHID_DLGIDX_SAVEINDEX References: <512289C7.1070705@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <512289C7.1070705@FreeBSD.org> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: office@freebsd.org, ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:23:51 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-02-18 15:06:31 -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On 2013-02-16 13:53:15 -0500, awarecons wrote: >> Upgrade libreoffice-3.5.7_1 to 3.6.5_2 > >> gcc 4.6.3: > > ... > > Please do not use non-default compilers to build LibreOffice unless > it is absolutely necessary. We cannot support all possible > combinations. > >> /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.6.5.2/dbaccess >> >> /inc/dbaccess_helpid.hrc:227:2: >> error: invalid preprocessing directive >> #definesHID_DLGIDX_SAVEINDEX ... This error is really nonsensical. dbaccess/inc/dbaccess_helpid.hrc has correct line: #define HID_DLGIDX_SAVEINDEX "DBACCESS_HID_DLGIDX_SAVEINDEX" Something's very wrong with your environment, it seems. Jung-uk Kim -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRIo1rAAoJECXpabHZMqHOCBMH/RqMjV9Qt5j14Yc9TET0L/Aa Iu804KSnr6sKpIomkCRqBXYNUzTJVg8a1nodC76nUfvAz266dAL5n5BIJQ+Zc8a6 lAjL3IepfEpQ2jW3LVStpsspaMXwrG51QLj4qC2SUEJTpH/+91mKlGt+hGnhSjxl QVdymTL9jBl0vESlQOO9A88gofXjHESrJyg78P0CKKJVPGmKciD2D7HTK/qB3drG 4siUk081Pg88fMq8pUhXRavYObKSIlSXsDkvmamzok6Tw2ya/YkCA+aLS65hOj3v XdMwZpIUcfBHBttBIEihQ2r9CQ4dqE1gDhr3te58Zq/zj42clMLQI0u0Tnfpwn8= =cFJd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 18 20:27:28 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 072E8DF0; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:27:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ia0-x22f.google.com (ia-in-x022f.1e100.net [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c02::22f]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8DB661D; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:27:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ia0-f175.google.com with SMTP id r4so5382343iaj.6 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:27:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=lHPcqtJcmQOb39qRLvU7K7Feb/DtBrvmHdf5aFAu/Go=; b=FA+TJbbkN/6f8DdB6n/sw3mw1xKhsAI1h70oVGmKsHt7qLYtptQKfb2NwyrLbI/mR6 VPQKFZV/l0wrAx3oBNY+ax2UYAChVEZafp9xl1v0zIzjnbAjBimBTPvlYCFMvB/8EKxL aM7FeKoMrk2kpck0HbIF5fbqLjnDhHjUYl4mVb1+E5lsBFsXVxW+AnDQFLOl2E3kqfbu L7jlkM3fhGDauLguOHhwuLxPQJQTaBHayb8ccrYybufJbDGOvGPXlwzvFKqEbj0MvJBE aJqZpS+nMsG4fwms5BEqnJqca3Qb9BGD8UxRYWlAYtK2cw+gYb6duFh4866CsIAa1rKf SZEQ== X-Received: by 10.50.202.97 with SMTP id kh1mr8354381igc.15.1361219247409; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:27:27 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: utisoft@gmail.com Received: by 10.64.63.12 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 12:26:57 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <511CED39.2010909@aldan.algebra.com> References: <511CED39.2010909@aldan.algebra.com> From: Chris Rees Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:26:57 +0000 X-Google-Sender-Auth: _UpdVCqD2PP7ejcvOTOpZUW_yH0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Why can't gcc-4.2.1 build usable libreoffice? To: "Mikhail T." Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: stable@freebsd.org, "office@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:27:28 -0000 On 14 February 2013 13:57, Mikhail T. wrote: > Hello! > > I just finished building editors/libreoffice with gcc-4.2.1 -- had to > edit the port's Makefile to prevent it from picking a different > compiler. Everything built and installed, but libreoffice dies on > start-up (right after flashing the splash-window): > > (gdb) where > #0 0x000000080596c1aa in cppu::__getTypeEntries () > from > /opt/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3 > #1 0x000000080596c333 in cppu::__queryDeepNoXInterface () > from > /opt/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3 > #2 0x000000080596d4a2 in cppu::WeakImplHelper_query () > from > /opt/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3 > #3 0x00000008116f2b03 in > cppu::WeakImplHelper1::queryInterface > () > from /opt/lib/libreoffice/ure/lib/bootstrap.uno.so > #4 0x0000000805970347 in > cppu::OInterfaceContainerHelper::disposeAndClear () > from > /opt/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3 > #5 0x00000008059705b2 in > cppu::OMultiTypeInterfaceContainerHelper::disposeAndClear () > from > /opt/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3 > #6 0x000000080593309f in cppu::OComponentHelper::dispose () > from > /opt/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3 > #7 0x0000000805963d00 in cppu::OFactoryComponentHelper::dispose () > from > /opt/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3 > #8 0x00000008116ec296 in stoc_smgr::OServiceManager::disposing () > from /opt/lib/libreoffice/ure/lib/bootstrap.uno.so > #9 0x000000080596af05 in cppu::WeakComponentImplHelperBase::dispose () > from > /opt/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3 > #10 0x00000008116e6244 in stoc_smgr::ORegistryServiceManager::dispose () > from /opt/lib/libreoffice/ure/lib/bootstrap.uno.so > #11 0x000000080596a573 in cppu::WeakComponentImplHelperBase::release () > from > /opt/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3 > #12 0x00000008059482f6 in (anonymous namespace)::createTypeRegistry () > from > /opt/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3 > #13 0x00000008059487bf in > cppu::defaultBootstrap_InitialComponentContext () > from > /opt/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3 > #14 0x0000000805948918 in > cppu::defaultBootstrap_InitialComponentContext () > from > /opt/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3 > #15 0x000000080212f883 in > desktop::Desktop::InitApplicationServiceManager () > from /opt/lib/libreoffice/program/libmergedlo.so > #16 0x000000080211f362 in desktop::Desktop::Init () from > /opt/lib/libreoffice/program/libmergedlo.so > #17 0x0000000807622113 in InitVCL () from > /opt/lib/libreoffice/program/libvcllo.so > #18 0x0000000807623151 in ImplSVMain () from > /opt/lib/libreoffice/program/libvcllo.so > #19 0x00000008076232d5 in SVMain () from > /opt/lib/libreoffice/program/libvcllo.so > #20 0x000000080214942e in soffice_main () from > /opt/lib/libreoffice/program/libmergedlo.so > #21 0x0000000000400773 in main () > > I do not blame the office@ team -- the port did not want to use > gcc-4.2.1, I forced it to. But I'd like to know, what is wrong with the > compiler shipped by FreeBSD-9.1 (and the only one, if WITHOUT_CLANG is > defined), that prevents building a healthy libreoffice? > > Is there a bug fixed in gcc-4.6? Or is it some (incorrect) assumption > made by libreoffice code? Thank you, Hi Mikhail, Libreoffice and openoffice have traditionally recommended that one use binary packages instead of building it from scratch. I'm sure you understand that our compiler in base is rather elderly, and that a project as insanely huge as Libreoffice is going to be highly sensitive to minute changes. As a consequence, some very narrow criteria are chosen to make maintenance of the port possible. You are welcome to try with gcc-4.6, but the last I heard it will only build with clang. Your mileage may vary, please let us know of success stories! Chris From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 18 20:36:16 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C9EB289; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:36:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from hammer.pct.niksun.com (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FCF36B9; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:36:16 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <51229054.8050706@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 15:34:28 -0500 From: Jung-uk Kim User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130128 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: awarecons Subject: Re: editors/libreoffice ISSUE nsplugin References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: office@freebsd.org, ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 20:36:16 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-02-16 14:05:51 -0500, awarecons wrote: > Is there any way to enable --disable-nsplugin? ... Nope, sorry. It pulls in too much Mozilla & GNOME dependency and it is really hard to maintain. If you really really want to try it out, you may be able to build it with www/libxul and set - --with-system-mozilla, --system-mozilla-headers, etc, etc. Jung-uk Kim -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRIpBUAAoJECXpabHZMqHOETcH/1i9IPHaZxw6zJS6wFPEU+Ye +6vtUqdXcB/dWr/v2klItA8Qz96/XUV14moORmIjew0nqEJ2pskXViLsa1Z9gQze sWE1NigwYOQEudec2ohqMbRL47go+pJpxJKP1i9qyVUbePgV+2vWwbLTsgPSLHI8 LrLEp81Bx5TaRsVRExLgAA03pexgaJoNonXR+cEmNxeUMXSQPhW5CHOKTTQsFdG+ P5jcxKfypP2qoEVor2WhfmpwbVNcApgD5OJsac+OtGhtTtrz1JzGGdWIRGosibZV gHTSepF9IsJAKjdDZUSg9zRBd2d/Z2bFzTQoYUVpm6Yjq2GxRCWy0CiThdF1kpw= =qb5n -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 18 21:40:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CBB918A for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:40:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BD528FB for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:40:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r1ILe0Rw083629 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:40:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r1ILe07A083624; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:40:00 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:40:00 GMT Message-Id: <201302182140.r1ILe07A083624@freefall.freebsd.org> To: office@FreeBSD.org From: dfilter@FreeBSD.ORG (dfilter service) Subject: Re: ports/176205: commit references a PR X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: dfilter service List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:40:01 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/176205; it has been noted by GNATS. From: dfilter@FreeBSD.ORG (dfilter service) To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/176205: commit references a PR Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:37:49 +0000 (UTC) Author: jkim Date: Mon Feb 18 21:37:41 2013 New Revision: 312531 URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/312531 Log: Fix jakarta-commons-httpclient build with some locale. PR: ports/176205 Modified: head/editors/libreoffice/Makefile Modified: head/editors/libreoffice/Makefile ============================================================================== --- head/editors/libreoffice/Makefile Mon Feb 18 21:36:06 2013 (r312530) +++ head/editors/libreoffice/Makefile Mon Feb 18 21:37:41 2013 (r312531) @@ -396,6 +396,7 @@ LDFLAGS= -L${LOCALBASE}/lib MAKE_ENV+= ENVCFLAGS="${CFLAGS}" ENVCXXFLAGS="${CXXFLAGS}" MAKE_ENV+= ENVLINKFLAGS="${LDFLAGS}" +MAKE_ENV+= LANG=C LC_ALL=C MAKE_ENV+= USE_GMAKE=1 TMPDIR?= /tmp _______________________________________________ svn-ports-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/svn-ports-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "svn-ports-all-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 18 21:49:48 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECED936B; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:49:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6E9294E; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:49:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r1ILnmTx085196; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:49:48 GMT (envelope-from jkim@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from jkim@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r1ILnlGk085192; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:49:47 GMT (envelope-from jkim) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:49:47 GMT Message-Id: <201302182149.r1ILnlGk085192@freefall.freebsd.org> To: peter@rulingia.com, jkim@FreeBSD.org, office@FreeBSD.org From: jkim@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/176205: editors/libreoffice: libreoffice won't build in UTF-8 environment X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:49:49 -0000 Synopsis: editors/libreoffice: libreoffice won't build in UTF-8 environment State-Changed-From-To: open->closed State-Changed-By: jkim State-Changed-When: Mon Feb 18 21:47:35 UTC 2013 State-Changed-Why: It should be fixed now. Note the runtime failure sounds like a different issue. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=176205 From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 05:35:36 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73610920; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 05:35:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-f44.google.com (mail-pa0-f44.google.com [209.85.220.44]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25760D41; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 05:35:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f44.google.com with SMTP id kp1so3208974pab.31 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:35:35 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=M8hnDo6GtWs0ouhpYnRabAML1Q9Qqka//SPpuvvrFk8=; b=mDq7yMUBl5RSmyZm3ARnDTvYVQUYpw00CJlzwJg68iR4kwDF7+qan6fGpHamqe7t3w eYYHEO4ZtA0lTpHLcjK+W11EP8ulkheW7+473cHQaGySYAVkWSVr7h+uZA6uVUKRYr8H /IyhPiwbgVJn0jbpiquK5MaPaR6vxo4w9N2buAacXvCL1eWHqB4wMWpqN/2Ksztqrh++ nwdPGv1B13uQYeK9vYNRLT+EkkvqDf2UNGpwyowZvhF0v8fa1WxmeAokbCP4KzGhdjU7 kpJvU+kQz0VvBJDj6EOLQt/Mp59ptYJ5vAidG5xozPG2n4/QkL7Aet33qWhj4gT1ykuA dSBQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.255.161 with SMTP id ar1mr37275364pbd.17.1361252135338; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:35:35 -0800 (PST) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.67.2.65 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:35:35 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <511CED39.2010909@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:35:35 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: yVNPtO-IbPQOSxTTNdsTXAE5XEo Message-ID: Subject: Re: Why can't gcc-4.2.1 build usable libreoffice? From: Kevin Oberman To: Chris Rees Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: "Mikhail T." , "office@freebsd.org" , stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 05:35:36 -0000 On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 12:26 PM, Chris Rees wrote: > On 14 February 2013 13:57, Mikhail T. wrote: >> Hello! >> >> I just finished building editors/libreoffice with gcc-4.2.1 -- had to >> edit the port's Makefile to prevent it from picking a different >> compiler. Everything built and installed, but libreoffice dies on >> start-up (right after flashing the splash-window): >> >> (gdb) where >> #0 0x000000080596c1aa in cppu::__getTypeEntries () >> from >> /opt/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3 >> #1 0x000000080596c333 in cppu::__queryDeepNoXInterface () >> from >> /opt/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3 >> #2 0x000000080596d4a2 in cppu::WeakImplHelper_query () >> from >> /opt/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3 >> #3 0x00000008116f2b03 in >> cppu::WeakImplHelper1::queryInterface >> () >> from /opt/lib/libreoffice/ure/lib/bootstrap.uno.so >> #4 0x0000000805970347 in >> cppu::OInterfaceContainerHelper::disposeAndClear () >> from >> /opt/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3 >> #5 0x00000008059705b2 in >> cppu::OMultiTypeInterfaceContainerHelper::disposeAndClear () >> from >> /opt/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3 >> #6 0x000000080593309f in cppu::OComponentHelper::dispose () >> from >> /opt/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3 >> #7 0x0000000805963d00 in cppu::OFactoryComponentHelper::dispose () >> from >> /opt/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3 >> #8 0x00000008116ec296 in stoc_smgr::OServiceManager::disposing () >> from /opt/lib/libreoffice/ure/lib/bootstrap.uno.so >> #9 0x000000080596af05 in cppu::WeakComponentImplHelperBase::dispose () >> from >> /opt/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3 >> #10 0x00000008116e6244 in stoc_smgr::ORegistryServiceManager::dispose () >> from /opt/lib/libreoffice/ure/lib/bootstrap.uno.so >> #11 0x000000080596a573 in cppu::WeakComponentImplHelperBase::release () >> from >> /opt/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3 >> #12 0x00000008059482f6 in (anonymous namespace)::createTypeRegistry () >> from >> /opt/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3 >> #13 0x00000008059487bf in >> cppu::defaultBootstrap_InitialComponentContext () >> from >> /opt/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3 >> #14 0x0000000805948918 in >> cppu::defaultBootstrap_InitialComponentContext () >> from >> /opt/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3 >> #15 0x000000080212f883 in >> desktop::Desktop::InitApplicationServiceManager () >> from /opt/lib/libreoffice/program/libmergedlo.so >> #16 0x000000080211f362 in desktop::Desktop::Init () from >> /opt/lib/libreoffice/program/libmergedlo.so >> #17 0x0000000807622113 in InitVCL () from >> /opt/lib/libreoffice/program/libvcllo.so >> #18 0x0000000807623151 in ImplSVMain () from >> /opt/lib/libreoffice/program/libvcllo.so >> #19 0x00000008076232d5 in SVMain () from >> /opt/lib/libreoffice/program/libvcllo.so >> #20 0x000000080214942e in soffice_main () from >> /opt/lib/libreoffice/program/libmergedlo.so >> #21 0x0000000000400773 in main () >> >> I do not blame the office@ team -- the port did not want to use >> gcc-4.2.1, I forced it to. But I'd like to know, what is wrong with the >> compiler shipped by FreeBSD-9.1 (and the only one, if WITHOUT_CLANG is >> defined), that prevents building a healthy libreoffice? >> >> Is there a bug fixed in gcc-4.6? Or is it some (incorrect) assumption >> made by libreoffice code? Thank you, > > Hi Mikhail, > > Libreoffice and openoffice have traditionally recommended that one use > binary packages instead of building it from scratch. > > I'm sure you understand that our compiler in base is rather elderly, > and that a project as insanely huge as Libreoffice is going to be > highly sensitive to minute changes. As a consequence, some very > narrow criteria are chosen to make maintenance of the port possible. > > You are welcome to try with gcc-4.6, but the last I heard it will only > build with clang. Your mileage may vary, please let us know of > success stories! Just for the record, is find that it works fine for me with gcc-4.6. 9.1-STABLE on i386 system. Building it with the default compiler results in a successful build, but the program would simply exit after a few seconds with no error. The exist status was 0. No messages. When I built with 4.6, it builds and runs fine, at least for the things I've tried. (4.6 invoked by setting WITH_GCC.) -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 13:30:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3A4C8B6 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:30:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6F53D76 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:30:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r1JDU0R7067404 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:30:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r1JDU06B067401; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:30:00 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:30:00 GMT Message-Id: <201302191330.r1JDU06B067401@freefall.freebsd.org> To: office@FreeBSD.org From: Gerhard Strangar Subject: Re: ports/167441: editors/libreoffice - Unable to print X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Gerhard Strangar List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:30:01 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/167441; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Gerhard Strangar To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, peterjeremy@acm.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/167441: editors/libreoffice - Unable to print Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:58:02 +0100 Hello, I just tried to upgrade to LibreOffice 3.6.5_2 and this problem showed up again. I'm not running CUPS, my "make config" options for LibreOffice are GTK2, MERGELIBS and SVG, nothing else. It compiled and installed without any problems, but it tells me there were no printers available and I cannot even print to a file, I don't get any error message for printing to a file, I just don't get that file. When I truss the LibreOffice start, there are no CUPS strings showing up. I also tried adding --with-ppds to the Makefile in the no CUPS part, but that didn't change anything. /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/share/psprint/driver/ does exist and it contains SGENPRT.PS and SGENT42.PS, a truss -f however, does not show access to this directory. I then tried compiling with CUPS support and with ppds and - BINGO, then it works. I don't know what CUPS is required for, but for some reason LibreOffice doesn't want to print without it. From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 14:23:40 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D375F3 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:23:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from smtp.rcn.com (smtp.rcn.com [69.168.97.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54D6E8F4 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:23:40 +0000 (UTC) X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=L+6fspv8 c=1 sm=0 a=sCkZyOwU0IjLO1BAXY68/A==:17 a=d8Isu0L9vBEA:10 a=ZrqZzSrQiogA:10 a=YNqtyO0l_hcA:10 a=LaogzpLLAAAA:8 a=CqN0Xa_Ne8wA:10 a=T68KuOtnIhgeSEkPQFoA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=AdtlHf8BKSVdY42ICL0A:9 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=QJ6YB865eIjTZC6m:21 a=sCkZyOwU0IjLO1BAXY68/A==:117 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: smtp02.rcn.cmh.synacor.com header.from=mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp02.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.mail=mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com; spf=neutral; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp02.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.user=anat; auth=pass (PLAIN) Received-SPF: neutral (smtp02.rcn.cmh.synacor.com: 173.63.211.146 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of aldan.algebra.com) Received: from [173.63.211.146] ([173.63.211.146:47870] helo=[192.168.1.8]) by smtp.rcn.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.49 r(42060/42061)) with ESMTPA id C6/A9-09236-AEA83215; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:23:38 -0500 Message-ID: <51238AE9.20205@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:23:37 -0500 From: "Mikhail T." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130209 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Rees Subject: Re: Why can't gcc-4.2.1 build usable libreoffice? References: <511CED39.2010909@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: stable@freebsd.org, "office@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:23:40 -0000 18.02.2013 15:26, Chris Rees ???????(??): > I'm sure you understand that our compiler in base is rather elderly, > and that a project as insanely huge as Libreoffice is going to be > highly sensitive to minute changes. No, Chris... I do not understand this wonderfully PR-esque response. See, my understanding always was, the only possible reasons for a compiler to produce a non-starting executable are: 1. The code is buggy. 2. The compiler is buggy. 3. Both of the above. My question was, which is it? 19.02.2013 00:35, Kevin Oberman ???????(??): > Just for the record, is find that it works fine for me with gcc-4.6. > 9.1-STABLE on i386 system. Building it with the default compiler > results in a successful build, but the program would simply exit after > a few seconds with no error. The exist status was 0. No messages. When > I built with 4.6, it builds and runs fine Yes, 4.6 is supposed to work and is supported by the office@ team. My question was about 4.2.1, which happens to be the base cc/c++ in 8.x and in 9.x as well, if world was built WITHOUT_CLANG. I too observe the 4.2.1-compiled office die at start-up -- the splash screen starts nicely and exits after kicking off the actual soffice.bin which segfaults. -mi From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 14:45:19 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A5A796D; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:45:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ie0-x22f.google.com (mail-ie0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22f]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D826A5A; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:45:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f175.google.com with SMTP id c12so8578407ieb.34 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:45:18 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=5nA5/nlQpQM8gfLmk8XqC3/eG9bRXMmydxd9Boxq/fA=; b=UUx1LF7gEvv/69JwxpyCaRnSO35Hs10C28b94M5BuUxY/Mmh3csl6o+QAWgj80nVgW vjr8gTaThwBI3sj6L/vCBL/Hvjp304Q6AoZ5gjtEkIi8O3BUXyREjhcvQEIUvCjD/Bxt dsjz7wQXwXaqyyJ4aeOyo5JrlZ9qAnRTT9zl1gD+F2vXr6GA80LM5wVF5D0zxfcGqpQn 1MJg1jy56tn4iKlyiwhINL449Hx3nzo4dUL+a6d7rrKWvlmWKxbbYwhISW8/VGxhLh/8 zWoY/FAuj5sL+LPrWixGn+ETG8h0+wuiyBLn8mxKqMSZa6y3ENYin0CnFjyQWKL4/uUp wfBQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.13.175 with SMTP id i15mr8770017igc.75.1361285113132; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:45:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.63.12 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:45:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.63.12 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 06:45:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <51238AE9.20205@aldan.algebra.com> References: <511CED39.2010909@aldan.algebra.com> <51238AE9.20205@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:45:12 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Why can't gcc-4.2.1 build usable libreoffice? From: Chris Rees To: "Mikhail T." Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: stable@freebsd.org, office@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:45:19 -0000 On 19 Feb 2013 14:23, "Mikhail T." wrote: > > 18.02.2013 15:26, Chris Rees =D0=BD=D0=B0=D0=BF=D0=B8=D1=81=D0=B0=D0=B2(= =D0=BB=D0=B0): >> >> I'm sure you understand that our compiler in base is rather elderly, >> and that a project as insanely huge as Libreoffice is going to be >> highly sensitive to minute changes. > > No, Chris... I do not understand this wonderfully PR-esque response. See, my understanding always was, the only possible reasons for a compiler to produce a non-starting executable are: > The code is buggy. > The compiler is buggy. > Both of the above. > My question was, which is it? My answer is that it is almost certainly (b). You are welcome to ask upstream about it, but I doubt they would show much interest in such an old compiler. I think it's insanity that we still use this version for ports by default, but never mind. Chris From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 16:53:03 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2AC2C2F for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:53:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from smtp.rcn.com (smtp.rcn.com [69.168.97.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A88A73CE for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:53:03 +0000 (UTC) X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=L+6fspv8 c=1 sm=0 a=fEl05wXzeJCkBz9gs2itqQ==:17 a=XBbVgglCP-sA:10 a=ZrqZzSrQiogA:10 a=YNqtyO0l_hcA:10 a=LaogzpLLAAAA:8 a=CqN0Xa_Ne8wA:10 a=i0xzKUX1_9SnFWFMHL0A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=MZmN-WP5MjHicLigKOkA:9 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=Occ0D41BaHMgmLg7:21 a=fEl05wXzeJCkBz9gs2itqQ==:117 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: smtp02.rcn.cmh.synacor.com header.from=mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp02.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.mail=mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com; spf=neutral; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp02.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.user=anat; auth=pass (PLAIN) Received-SPF: neutral (smtp02.rcn.cmh.synacor.com: 209.6.63.29 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of aldan.algebra.com) Received: from [209.6.63.29] ([209.6.63.29:53374] helo=utka.zajac) by smtp.rcn.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.49 r(42060/42061)) with ESMTPA id 65/F8-09236-CEDA3215; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:53:02 -0500 Message-ID: <5123ADEC.2040103@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:53:00 -0500 From: "Mikhail T." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Rees Subject: Re: Why can't gcc-4.2.1 build usable libreoffice? References: <511CED39.2010909@aldan.algebra.com> <51238AE9.20205@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: stable@freebsd.org, office@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 16:53:03 -0000 On 19.02.2013 09:45, Chris Rees wrote: >> a. The code is buggy. >> b. The compiler is buggy. >> c.Both of the above. >>My question was, which is it? > > My answer is that it is almost certainly (b). Are there identified, known problems with the version? From what little I've heard, our cc had some bug-fixes merged-in from newer versions. For example, graphics/vigra now compiles fine with the stock cc in 9.1, whereas it used to need a newer one. Maybe, there are already fixes available for whatever is needed for the office to build properly as well? The older version may be allowed to miss some optimization opportunities or be less descriptive in warnings, but it must produce valid binaries from valid code [Captain Obvious hat off] > You are welcome to ask upstream about it, but I doubt they would show > much interest in such an old compiler. Upstream gcc? They may not be very interested, indeed, but it is FreeBSD, that delivered this compiler to me -- in the most recent stable version of the OS. This is why I'm asking stable@'s opinion on the matter... We aren't really so bad, BTW -- Red Hat Enterprise 5.7 (the latest in their 5.x line) still has cc, that identifes itself as: gcc version 4.1.2 20080704 (Red Hat 4.1.2-51) > I think it's insanity that we still use this version for ports by > default, but never mind. I find it perfectly reasonable, that ports use the base cc and c++ by default. But I agree, that it is insane, that the base compiler can not compile one of the most popular open-source application-suits... -mi From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 17:23:08 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C53557EA; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:23:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-x22a.google.com (mail-wg0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22a]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A83B7A2; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:23:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id 12so3814535wgh.3 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:23:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=UlDJg0wDx41uALVctvXO5vLKmOS5us3wg2x42/LXuwI=; b=IqKJrbVpiyYiTp/cA3lbGBS0qKaMr2kbG9+UktAK+kPAtLLieBsB17pO1BNAG/7EXZ InzqJMnicOHZ2d6qkgBYXfH5SENpWdlN5adpchu1K6rsq0b2o4G9ykV7n6Coi8mwjF0W auzH0xPCl0rnZZF5npAjs7c5ICDNarQvwX8+Q2szzkw1vDrtQqx2oVn1B3LWanwZmgLG z4Mn1M1k3akzdqvCIsUShASvevTuYhYo7BtAvFW+FY/9m4IH2Pi/BxOjHVdOrSO2woCy VFNT/3oEbKjyvkXot+F3ILSP6snvcBnnYAWGji5SqmqMQ7zclpqj5Lc0V4ZpMFMouAbr 4WkQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.93.234 with SMTP id cx10mr29002084wib.34.1361294587196; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:23:07 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.236.88 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:23:07 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5123ADEC.2040103@aldan.algebra.com> References: <511CED39.2010909@aldan.algebra.com> <51238AE9.20205@aldan.algebra.com> <5123ADEC.2040103@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:23:07 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: GXTaIiD4CmAFKDc3ktSS7qphjSc Message-ID: Subject: Re: Why can't gcc-4.2.1 build usable libreoffice? From: Adrian Chadd To: "Mikhail T." Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: stable@freebsd.org, office@freebsd.org, Chris Rees X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:23:08 -0000 Hi, The base compiler is supposed to compile base and bootstrap whatever else you need to compile other software. It's not supposed to be continuously updated to new, major versions. :-) I bet *office just uses a bunch of either horrible syntax that breaks things, or newer C/C++ features that are buggy in older compilers. They could've made their code compile on older compilers.. they just haven't bothered. In any case, why hasn't that port been blessed with the "requires gcc 4.6+" port option/dependency? I thought that's why we _have_ that. Adrian From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 17:35:39 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9356D66; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:35:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ian@FreeBSD.org) Received: from duck.symmetricom.us (duck.symmetricom.us [206.168.13.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F8A2868; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:35:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from damnhippie.dyndns.org (daffy.symmetricom.us [206.168.13.218]) by duck.symmetricom.us (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r1JHZWkj006813; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:35:38 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from ian@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [172.22.42.240] (revolution.hippie.lan [172.22.42.240]) by damnhippie.dyndns.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r1JHZJMP050038; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:35:19 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from ian@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: Why can't gcc-4.2.1 build usable libreoffice? From: Ian Lepore To: Adrian Chadd In-Reply-To: References: <511CED39.2010909@aldan.algebra.com> <51238AE9.20205@aldan.algebra.com> <5123ADEC.2040103@aldan.algebra.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:35:18 -0700 Message-ID: <1361295318.1164.70.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Mikhail T." , office@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, Chris Rees X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:35:39 -0000 On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 09:23 -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hi, > > The base compiler is supposed to compile base and bootstrap whatever > else you need to compile other software. > > It's not supposed to be continuously updated to new, major versions. :-) > > I bet *office just uses a bunch of either horrible syntax that breaks > things, or newer C/C++ features that are buggy in older compilers. > They could've made their code compile on older compilers.. they just > haven't bothered. > > In any case, why hasn't that port been blessed with the "requires gcc > 4.6+" port option/dependency? I thought that's why we _have_ that. It has been. The OP stated the he disabled that and forced use of gcc 4.2.1, and is now complaining that it doesn't work after specifically taking steps to make it not-work. -- Ian From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 18:04:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F0FAEA4 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:04:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from smtp.rcn.com (smtp.rcn.com [69.168.97.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12F6BA49 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:04:01 +0000 (UTC) X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=L+6fspv8 c=1 sm=0 a=fEl05wXzeJCkBz9gs2itqQ==:17 a=XBbVgglCP-sA:10 a=ZrqZzSrQiogA:10 a=YNqtyO0l_hcA:10 a=LaogzpLLAAAA:8 a=CqN0Xa_Ne8wA:10 a=-hyCGDrDAAAA:8 a=q56oFxeYAAAA:8 a=N0DeWHDvTMtoE8W4e64A:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=Er2gK3W4G3kA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=RSu4zN4zdzqC0SbbftkA:9 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=zvm9xgTIpEoA:10 a=8J37bO9ug7cNNtqf:21 a=fEl05wXzeJCkBz9gs2itqQ==:117 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: smtp02.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.mail=mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com; spf=neutral; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp02.rcn.cmh.synacor.com header.from=mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp02.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.user=anat; auth=pass (PLAIN) Received-SPF: neutral (smtp02.rcn.cmh.synacor.com: 209.6.63.29 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of aldan.algebra.com) Received: from [209.6.63.29] ([209.6.63.29:41212] helo=utka.zajac) by smtp.rcn.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.49 r(42060/42061)) with ESMTPA id 9F/FC-09236-E8EB3215; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:03:59 -0500 Message-ID: <5123BE8E.2080209@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:03:58 -0500 From: "Mikhail T." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: Why can't gcc-4.2.1 build usable libreoffice? References: <511CED39.2010909@aldan.algebra.com> <51238AE9.20205@aldan.algebra.com> <5123ADEC.2040103@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: stable@freebsd.org, office@freebsd.org, Chris Rees X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:04:01 -0000 On 19.02.2013 12:23, Adrian Chadd wrote: > I bet *office just uses a bunch of either horrible syntax that breaks > things, or newer C/C++ features that are buggy in older compilers. Well, yes, this is, what I wanted to find out -- which case is it. There was a point, when we had a special compiler-port just for OpenOffice.org: http://www.freshports.org/lang/gcc-ooo That port was building gcc-3.4.1, which was NOT "too old" for the office only a few years ago (when gcc-4.2.1 already existed). I'd love to see a comment from people, who /know/ what is going on. Then we may be able to either patch-up the base compiler, or the office, code or both. And let the healing begin[TM]. I'm afraid, though, the compiler-people are too cool to use an office suit -- finding vi (and, perhaps, TeX) sufficient for their documents, while the office@ maintainers prefer the easy way of just adding the newer compiler to the requirements. Getting these two distinct groups to meet in one thread was the point of this topic... On 19.02.2013 12:35, Ian Lepore wrote: >> In any case, why hasn't that port been blessed with the "requires gcc >> >4.6+" port option/dependency? I thought that's why we_have_ that. > It has been. The OP stated the he disabled that and forced use of gcc > 4.2.1, and is now complaining that it doesn't work after specifically > taking steps to make it not-work. Ian, contrary to your accusation, I never complained that the port does not work. Moreover, to prevent that suspicion from entering sincere minds, I explicitly said: "I do not blame the office@ team -- the port did not want to use gcc-4.2.1, I forced it to." Did you not see that sentence, or do deliberately misrepresent my original post? -mi From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 18:04:07 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 799B7EA5; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:04:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-f180.google.com (mail-wi0-f180.google.com [209.85.212.180]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BCDAA4A; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:04:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f180.google.com with SMTP id hi8so5161945wib.13 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:04:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=dsjioUwIxGX7O1LAwqQxMIAkcv53Aprd8RKZMkH16B4=; b=AXm2OO0wqazXAoM4i/OiM9Fh4JBFP/E24sTL+purtGWDNyGhWEp9kY9ceCKZQ8UdC7 hPhFH8Cs0KBo5kK4f2QpAUv9IMtjYhFQhmPPbBnVxkeJRwQFI1vc7wqTr1ESwmQTtXBP iv2GLf9Ah4Wv8DuKKWo0g/k3j+VuWaCq5yXv6zWcj9l4zL2KSuC1QQqtjAXXhXZFu30d wnjd2tePBSaS/XKPnte+DuAo2FuKHVtr1NyQlpkCTX8bFu0u+cOEbkKCBzPs0ZrPPfmZ pT8RuO6GCp1Pl+NOlE1i8Cb7XskupdsnE/d7qx71T8M6giAovT8mHzJ2HOAHCsABKfW8 IIGQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.79.227 with SMTP id m3mr25508751wix.12.1361297040261; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:04:00 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.236.88 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:04:00 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <1361295318.1164.70.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> References: <511CED39.2010909@aldan.algebra.com> <51238AE9.20205@aldan.algebra.com> <5123ADEC.2040103@aldan.algebra.com> <1361295318.1164.70.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:04:00 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: V-tqF6gF9KPSmcUZR-c_EA_f3XE Message-ID: Subject: Re: Why can't gcc-4.2.1 build usable libreoffice? From: Adrian Chadd To: Ian Lepore Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "Mikhail T." , office@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, Chris Rees X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:04:07 -0000 On 19 February 2013 09:35, Ian Lepore wrote: > It has been. The OP stated the he disabled that and forced use of gcc > 4.2.1, and is now complaining that it doesn't work after specifically > taking steps to make it not-work. Hence my reply. :-) OP - "don't do that." The base compiler is for the base system, not for everything. Adrian From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 18:06:03 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1794A164; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:06:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-f48.google.com (mail-wg0-f48.google.com [74.125.82.48]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ACA1A86; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:06:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id 16so5760941wgi.27 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:06:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=1gwEr1xgnBkl6I6dYYu4dI5HyAoIZr9mR/RjveCd/Pk=; b=QFtfhuGES1GOcOz4uUeeRaPFk9aqHvzOV9A/zJWCApbbtFB1YoAix7wgeOdZZ44jrM DkoKZDNNupARJ53CKCHo2Rf4ATA4LfCNdeejSarftwWnsfb8kYrSDfzZ3OT4sAsSwwZv N92rpfQtnMd62kuomZmp9ZiLuz9nrfHl04Q/rv1fHcoNpKS0Wrp27AmJqs7DcR3UNRxU G+4+e74hK1PjZUcLObPcPSkJUcsw5PAX4oM5ZkzNDsNJ8s5jHkDQCYzfgeCcOPHhqjGQ ncqGxgzhxtWEeTThN79ArYkZEdzuAWbO4loEis4ncakbqjI2+qFZCa++fHgopa+bGY+y E4eg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.93.234 with SMTP id cx10mr29278068wib.34.1361297140849; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:05:40 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.236.88 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:05:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5123BE8E.2080209@aldan.algebra.com> References: <511CED39.2010909@aldan.algebra.com> <51238AE9.20205@aldan.algebra.com> <5123ADEC.2040103@aldan.algebra.com> <5123BE8E.2080209@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 10:05:40 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: _kMIGCTMe5vQ7jH1l18bO6DsXpk Message-ID: Subject: Re: Why can't gcc-4.2.1 build usable libreoffice? From: Adrian Chadd To: "Mikhail T." Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: stable@freebsd.org, office@freebsd.org, Chris Rees X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:06:03 -0000 .. I think the compiler people just use the port as compiled with the compiler that is known to work with it, and move on. :-) I re-read your original post. It's likely some queer corner case C++ or C++ library bug as shipped with the base system. Adrian From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 18:19:16 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1769B610; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:19:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ian@FreeBSD.org) Received: from duck.symmetricom.us (duck.symmetricom.us [206.168.13.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE20EB3A; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:19:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from damnhippie.dyndns.org (daffy.symmetricom.us [206.168.13.218]) by duck.symmetricom.us (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r1JIJE1T007295; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:19:15 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from ian@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [172.22.42.240] (revolution.hippie.lan [172.22.42.240]) by damnhippie.dyndns.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r1JIJCfI050140; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:19:12 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from ian@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: Why can't gcc-4.2.1 build usable libreoffice? From: Ian Lepore To: "Mikhail T." In-Reply-To: <5123BE8E.2080209@aldan.algebra.com> References: <511CED39.2010909@aldan.algebra.com> <51238AE9.20205@aldan.algebra.com> <5123ADEC.2040103@aldan.algebra.com> <5123BE8E.2080209@aldan.algebra.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:19:12 -0700 Message-ID: <1361297952.1164.83.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Adrian Chadd , office@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, Chris Rees X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:19:16 -0000 On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 13:03 -0500, Mikhail T. wrote: > On 19.02.2013 12:23, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > I bet *office just uses a bunch of either horrible syntax that breaks > > things, or newer C/C++ features that are buggy in older compilers. > Well, yes, this is, what I wanted to find out -- which case is it. There was a > point, when we had a special compiler-port just for OpenOffice.org: > > http://www.freshports.org/lang/gcc-ooo > > That port was building gcc-3.4.1, which was NOT "too old" for the office only a > few years ago (when gcc-4.2.1 already existed). > > I'd love to see a comment from people, who /know/ what is going on. Then we may > be able to either patch-up the base compiler, or the office, code or both. And > let the healing begin[TM]. > > I'm afraid, though, the compiler-people are too cool to use an office suit -- > finding vi (and, perhaps, TeX) sufficient for their documents, while the office@ > maintainers prefer the easy way of just adding the newer compiler to the > requirements. Getting these two distinct groups to meet in one thread was the > point of this topic... > > On 19.02.2013 12:35, Ian Lepore wrote: > >> In any case, why hasn't that port been blessed with the "requires gcc > >> >4.6+" port option/dependency? I thought that's why we_have_ that. > > It has been. The OP stated the he disabled that and forced use of gcc > > 4.2.1, and is now complaining that it doesn't work after specifically > > taking steps to make it not-work. > Ian, contrary to your accusation, I never complained that the port does not > work. Moreover, to prevent that suspicion from entering sincere minds, I > explicitly said: "I do not blame the office@ team -- the port did not want to > use gcc-4.2.1, I forced it to." Did you not see that sentence, or do > deliberately misrepresent my original post? > > -mi Comments such as "compiler people are too cool..." as well as things such as > Upstream gcc? They may not be very interested, indeed, but it is > FreeBSD, that > delivered this compiler to me -- in the most recent stable version of > the OS. > and > > But I agree, that it is insane, that the base compiler can not compile > one of > the most popular open-source application-suits... All strike me as being "complaints," but if that seems like a mis-characterization to you, then I apologize. Licensing prevents us from updating gcc in the base. Maintainers of large opensource suites are likely to have little interest in supporting a buggy old compiler years after it has been obsoleted by newer versions. The reasonable solution is to use a newer compiler to compile newer ports, and put ongoing maintenance efforts into solidifying the replacement compiler rather than propping up the buggy old one. -- Ian From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 18:54:07 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1B8C552 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:54:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from smtp.rcn.com (smtp.rcn.com [69.168.97.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64C5BE56 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:54:07 +0000 (UTC) X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=YKIdOG6x c=1 sm=0 a=fEl05wXzeJCkBz9gs2itqQ==:17 a=XBbVgglCP-sA:10 a=ZrqZzSrQiogA:10 a=YNqtyO0l_hcA:10 a=LaogzpLLAAAA:8 a=CqN0Xa_Ne8wA:10 a=B7aBkD-rAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=q_EOvSjL-diwKzKj6BcA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=GcTa5IXod3kA:10 a=pGLkceISAAAA:8 a=rDbwDDubdOr4YAqla0UA:9 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=SK8d7xaoX86Is8Os:21 a=fEl05wXzeJCkBz9gs2itqQ==:117 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com header.from=mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.mail=mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com; spf=neutral; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.user=anat; auth=pass (PLAIN) Received-SPF: neutral (smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com: 209.6.63.29 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of aldan.algebra.com) Received: from [209.6.63.29] ([209.6.63.29:57511] helo=utka.zajac) by smtp.rcn.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.49 r(42060/42061)) with ESMTPA id 43/60-28101-D4AC3215; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:54:05 -0500 Message-ID: <5123CA4C.90703@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 13:54:04 -0500 From: "Mikhail T." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ian Lepore Subject: Re: Why can't gcc-4.2.1 build usable libreoffice? References: <511CED39.2010909@aldan.algebra.com> <51238AE9.20205@aldan.algebra.com> <5123ADEC.2040103@aldan.algebra.com> <5123BE8E.2080209@aldan.algebra.com> <1361297952.1164.83.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> In-Reply-To: <1361297952.1164.83.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Adrian Chadd , office@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, Chris Rees X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:54:07 -0000 On 19.02.2013 13:19, Ian Lepore wrote: > All strike me as being "complaints," but if that seems like a > mis-characterization to you, then I apologize. These were, indeed, complaints, but not about the port "not working after I broke it". My complaint is that, though the port "works" out of the box, the office@ maintainers have given up on the base compiler too easily -- comments in the makefile make no mention of any bug-reports filed with anyone, for example. It sure seems, no attempts were made to analyze the failures... I don't think, such "going with the flow" is responsible and am afraid, the inglorious days of building a special compiler just for the office will return... Maybe, it is just an omission -- and the particular shortcomings of the base compiler (and/or the rest of the toolchain) are already known and documented somewhere else? > Licensing prevents us from updating gcc in the base. Licensing? Could you elaborate, which aspect of licensing you have in mind? > Maintainers of large opensource suites are likely to have little interest in supporting LibreOffice's own Native_Build page makes no mention of a required compiler version. Unless a compiler is documented to not support a required feature, it is supposed to work. Thus, filing a bug-report with LibreOffice could've been fruitful -- if it is the code, rather than the toolchain, that are at fault... > a buggy old compiler years after it has been obsoleted by newer versions. So, it is your conclusion too, that our base compiler is "buggy" -- and that little can be done about it. Am I really the only one here disturbed by the fact, that the compilers shipped as cc(1) and/or c++(1) in our favorite operating system's most recent stable versions (9.1 and 8.3) are considered buggy? Not just old -- and thus unable to process more modern language-standards/features, but buggy -- processing those features incorrectly? There is certainly nothing in our errata about it... On 19.02.2013 13:05, Adrian Chadd wrote: > .. I think the compiler people just use the port as compiled with the > compiler that is known to work with it, and move on. Such people would, perhaps, be even better served by an RPM-based system, don't you think? But I don't think so -- the amount of OPTIONS in the port is large, and a lot of people are likely to build their own. Not because they like it, but because they want a PostgreSQL driver or KDE4 (or GTK3) interface or... -mi From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 19:14:15 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0DD71DE; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:14:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from utisoft@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ia0-x234.google.com (ia-in-x0234.1e100.net [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c02::234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DBA5A0; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:14:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ia0-f180.google.com with SMTP id f27so6326615iae.39 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:14:15 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=uRJQg4COwrhsyChX4jWc145XSB4EaMHSGa28CYt5G4o=; b=Jlcq4GvWVQBSLAlk6JpIaThLcFJ4tZxsgV827R+DK1zn1dG/UuiFlRj3iZW6naxMGH GDxmQHMt4DWgCpLLCCu/aDNDQsGaSbv8EUpgVFJ9xb6QUSM216ky5p03kBc/H9iBFn6C 29/xVQ7hlpvdC7tUjiv9Qu7hwQ2317zRbVG/5jbjMBEFpesZuQs4R3uRjiRf7a62B2fq 8klqT9Myq9/k59hdcx+Lw9iJm4mgxw0j+r8bFh/LCbcljoXYXWBxKSN6NeUp6KHHGVgE 7tze49xJ5e8zx0xb3wGghyYt+tRBuJiUY3udMa4ialFXIRQ19ePdmdoRm02wC31lNEru 3mVw== X-Received: by 10.50.178.10 with SMTP id cu10mr10041921igc.75.1361301255047; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:14:15 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.63.12 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:13:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5123CA4C.90703@aldan.algebra.com> References: <511CED39.2010909@aldan.algebra.com> <51238AE9.20205@aldan.algebra.com> <5123ADEC.2040103@aldan.algebra.com> <5123BE8E.2080209@aldan.algebra.com> <1361297952.1164.83.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <5123CA4C.90703@aldan.algebra.com> From: Chris Rees Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:13:44 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Why can't gcc-4.2.1 build usable libreoffice? To: "Mikhail T." Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: Adrian Chadd , "office@freebsd.org" , stable@freebsd.org, Ian Lepore X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:14:15 -0000 Somehow attribution has been screwed here-- I will perhaps blame the appalling Android Gmail app that I used to reply to an earlier message. On 19 February 2013 18:54, Mikhail T. wrote: > These were, indeed, complaints, but not about the port "not working after= I broke it". My complaint is that, though the port "works" out of the box,= the office@ maintainers have given up on the base compiler too easily -- c= omments in the makefile make no mention of any bug-reports filed with anyon= e, for example. It sure seems, no attempts were made to analyze the failure= s... I don't think, such "going with the flow" is responsible and am afraid= , the inglorious days of building a special compiler just for the office wi= ll return... I'm sorry that you feel that the maintainers of Libreoffice have taken an easy route; you can certainly show them how easy it is to do by providing some patches/fixes, or working with upstream. I don't see how anyone on freebsd-stable@ will either be interested or knowledgeable in Libreoffice internals. > Maybe, it is just an omission -- and the particular shortcomings of the b= ase compiler (and/or the rest of the toolchain) are already known and docum= ented somewhere else? > > Licensing prevents us from updating gcc in the base. > > Licensing? Could you elaborate, which aspect of licensing you have in min= d? GPLv3. >> Maintainers of large opensource suites are likely to have little interes= t in supporting >> LibreOffice's own Native_Build page makes no mention of a required compi= ler version. Unless a compiler is documented to not support a required feat= ure, it is supposed to work. Thus, filing a bug-report with LibreOffice cou= ld've been fruitful -- if it is the code, rather than the toolchain, that a= re at fault... > >> a buggy old compiler years after it has been obsoleted by newer versions= . > > So, it is your conclusion too, that our base compiler is "buggy" -- and t= hat little can be done about it. That is why we're replacing it with LLVM/Clang. > Am I really the only one here disturbed by the fact, that the compilers s= hipped as cc(1) and/or c++(1) in our favorite operating system's most recen= t stable versions (9.1 and 8.3) are considered buggy? Not just old -- and t= hus unable to process more modern language-standards/features, but buggy --= processing those features incorrectly? There is certainly nothing in our e= rrata about it... It is no secret that our base compiler is old. What do you think happens in newer versions, if not added features and bugfixes? > On 19.02.2013 13:05, Adrian Chadd wrote: > >> .. I think the compiler people just use the port as compiled with the >> compiler that is known to work with it, and move on. > > > Such people would, perhaps, be even better served by an RPM-based system,= don't you think? But I don't think so -- the amount of OPTIONS in the port= is large, and a lot of people are likely to build their own. Not because t= hey like it, but because they want a PostgreSQL driver or KDE4 (or GTK3) i= nterface or... Irrelevant. You choosing to compile with a different compiler adds no value and can't be compared with a different interface. Please fix it yourself, or talk to upstream. Chris From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 19:15:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E778740C; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:15:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ian@FreeBSD.org) Received: from duck.symmetricom.us (duck.symmetricom.us [206.168.13.214]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C606BF; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:15:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from damnhippie.dyndns.org (daffy.symmetricom.us [206.168.13.218]) by duck.symmetricom.us (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r1JJEsrm008371; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:15:00 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from ian@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [172.22.42.240] (revolution.hippie.lan [172.22.42.240]) by damnhippie.dyndns.org (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r1JJEkbQ050196; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:14:46 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from ian@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: Why can't gcc-4.2.1 build usable libreoffice? From: Ian Lepore To: "Mikhail T." In-Reply-To: <5123CA4C.90703@aldan.algebra.com> References: <511CED39.2010909@aldan.algebra.com> <51238AE9.20205@aldan.algebra.com> <5123ADEC.2040103@aldan.algebra.com> <5123BE8E.2080209@aldan.algebra.com> <1361297952.1164.83.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <5123CA4C.90703@aldan.algebra.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 12:14:46 -0700 Message-ID: <1361301286.1164.93.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.32.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Adrian Chadd , office@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:15:02 -0000 On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 13:54 -0500, Mikhail T. wrote: > > Licensing prevents us from updating gcc in the base. > Licensing? Could you elaborate, which aspect of licensing you have in > mind? Versions of gcc after the 4.2.1 version we use are licensed under GPLv3. I'm not a lawyer, so I don't understand all the fine details of why GPLv3 is bad for the freebsd project, but I accept the analysis and decisions the project made on that subject some time ago. As you might imagine, switching to a new compiler isn't something you decide to do this afternoon and finish up tomorrow with a big checkin. It takes many months of testing and iteratively fixing bugs... bugs found in the new compiler, and bugs the new compiler exposes in the existing source base. I think we've been able to cherry-pick a few specific fixes from gcc upstream that weren't encumbered by GPLv3, but for the most part I think nobody is actively maintaining the GPLv2 code anymore. -- Ian From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 19:16:53 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 015DC534; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:16:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from hammer.pct.niksun.com (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67A4EE5; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:16:52 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5123CF37.7000506@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:15:03 -0500 From: Jung-uk Kim User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130128 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: Why can't gcc-4.2.1 build usable libreoffice? References: <511CED39.2010909@aldan.algebra.com> <51238AE9.20205@aldan.algebra.com> <5123ADEC.2040103@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Mikhail T." , office@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, Chris Rees X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:16:53 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-02-19 12:23:07 -0500, Adrian Chadd wrote: > In any case, why hasn't that port been blessed with the "requires > gcc 4.6+" port option/dependency? I thought that's why we _have_ > that. The short answer is we cannot support gcc 4.6+ unless we have a dedicated *ports* compiler. Okay, it seems to be a FAQ now and I'll try to explain as much as I can. If you have binaries compiled with g++ from ports tree, those binaries should not be linked with binaries that are compiled with the base compiler because they pull in different libstdc++ and friends and they have different ABIs. Also, some C++ libraries are very "sensitive" to standard C++ libraries, e.g., Boost. On top of that, UNO C++ bridge is really tightly coupled with C++ runtime. [1] Some libraries come with configuration headers and they are usually coupled with *build* environment, not *runtime* environment. So on and so forth. You see, that's why we had numerous build failure reports for LibreOffice in C++ unit tests. [2] Traditionally, OpenOffice.org builds everything from bundled libraries and headers so that it is almost self-contained. For example, STLport is used as a C++ STL library by default. This model makes perfect sense for a stand-alone downloadable package because the build environment may be very different from runtime environment. LO has kinda opposite philosophy, i.e., modular is better. This model works well if users are using prebuilt packages, i.e., Linux distros. [3] What do we go from here? I don't know. One thing I know for sure is we cannot support every possible build/runtime environment. Feel free to suggest your ideas and thoughts. Jung-uk Kim 1. http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Uno 2. Most of them are actually legit but I gave up on explaining why and turned them off by default. If you had build failure before, now you may experience runtime failures instead, sorry. 3. We may go back to monolithic build model, perhaps. Not sure. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRI883AAoJECXpabHZMqHO+6gH/2uvg/KTlsHKuxGG1XGPjJct icKy/nsCJK9XkkNaA3O7Zkpiddb1y2TNf9WW+/NmttfsnZ2aMos1jBnfIBr9l+ny Gw8V09JXOtUj1Ew3QZRF0efXz0sB7C37jEEeJWgF6IB4spq+BLAriCKShsa8bh+p PTwbE+ooib5Pzyf9NWIHzATiykeC1pSHz+3lnRhpNv9TFawcHsGyOfJRmr37eefO jodUWXzbJivCMFteWBaZwUHJkWVfMq4h+sdUyui0dP+T1EULQPpafNNkFkPcHthA dZzFfYGKgUjqn7PfO4B8wK5wqb/mO1rxgQ7NPQMla30PCN6iy9mNCFnMaR/nrzw= =PgIy -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 19:31:04 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA29BA3A for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:31:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from smtp.rcn.com (smtp.rcn.com [69.168.97.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F67218D for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:31:04 +0000 (UTC) X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=YKIdOG6x c=1 sm=0 a=fEl05wXzeJCkBz9gs2itqQ==:17 a=XBbVgglCP-sA:10 a=ZrqZzSrQiogA:10 a=YNqtyO0l_hcA:10 a=LaogzpLLAAAA:8 a=CqN0Xa_Ne8wA:10 a=uSh21QFSPVWLqie21wMA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=5R9oVisYHOhQI_zo0V0A:9 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=IMrvVOUcc4QipMYW:21 a=fEl05wXzeJCkBz9gs2itqQ==:117 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.mail=mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com; spf=neutral; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com header.from=mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.user=anat; auth=pass (PLAIN) Received-SPF: neutral (smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com: 209.6.63.29 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of aldan.algebra.com) Received: from [209.6.63.29] ([209.6.63.29:52339] helo=utka.zajac) by smtp.rcn.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.49 r(42060/42061)) with ESMTPA id 50/A8-28101-6F2D3215; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:31:02 -0500 Message-ID: <5123D2F6.5040909@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:31:02 -0500 From: "Mikhail T." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jung-uk Kim Subject: Re: Why can't gcc-4.2.1 build usable libreoffice? References: <511CED39.2010909@aldan.algebra.com> <51238AE9.20205@aldan.algebra.com> <5123ADEC.2040103@aldan.algebra.com> <5123CF37.7000506@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <5123CF37.7000506@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Adrian Chadd , office@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, Chris Rees X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:31:04 -0000 On 19.02.2013 14:15, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > What do we go from here? I don't know. One thing I know for sure is > we cannot support every possible build/runtime environment. > > Feel free to suggest your ideas and thoughts. Well, support for "every possible" combination is, of course, a toll order, but support for the base cc/c++ is a reasonable expectation, in my opinion... And if there is a *good* reason to reject the base compiler, I'd expect such good reason to be documented -- preferably with bug-reports filed against either the FreeBSD and its toolchain or against the LibreOffice code. Or both... On 19.02.2013 14:21, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > There are damn good reasons all my systems have > WITHOUT_CLANG=true in src.conf. Actually, clang, whatever faults you may have seen in it, would've produced a working libreoffice build. But it is not the cc/c++ on 9.1 and 8.3... -mi From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 19:47:22 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1A4AE97; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:47:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from hammer.pct.niksun.com (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0908D23C; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:47:21 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5123D65D.2030301@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:45:33 -0500 From: Jung-uk Kim User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130128 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Mikhail T." Subject: Re: Why can't gcc-4.2.1 build usable libreoffice? References: <511CED39.2010909@aldan.algebra.com> <51238AE9.20205@aldan.algebra.com> <5123ADEC.2040103@aldan.algebra.com> <5123CF37.7000506@FreeBSD.org> <5123D2F6.5040909@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <5123D2F6.5040909@aldan.algebra.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Adrian Chadd , office@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, Chris Rees X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:47:22 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-02-19 14:31:02 -0500, Mikhail T. wrote: > On 19.02.2013 14:15, Jung-uk Kim wrote: >> What do we go from here? I don't know. One thing I know for >> sure is we cannot support every possible build/runtime >> environment. >> >> Feel free to suggest your ideas and thoughts. > Well, support for "every possible" combination is, of course, a > toll order, but support for the base cc/c++ is a reasonable > expectation, in my opinion... Actually, I tried very hard to build sane LO with gcc 4.2 but it wasn't fruitful. Eventually, I gave up on adding kludges after kludges because LO is moving away from pre-C++11 compilers anyway. :-( > And if there is a *good* reason to reject the base compiler, I'd > expect such good reason to be documented -- preferably with > bug-reports filed against either the FreeBSD and its toolchain or > against the LibreOffice code. Or both... I believe there were plenty PRs already. Jung-uk Kim -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRI9ZdAAoJECXpabHZMqHOetMH+gMVJvAdp9x8jSzqvZQoaw28 fXoyNunlPTMq5U1sBzL1ZURm1nPwSutlAp5dccd4oRWQUXZ5uf09vNP8hI02cXz6 xteVQXtPEYYbkk6ySlpUfCl/Xostr1vkzT1a52KwGK8VHZsV41SXZEEylbBmTRfx ikoSpwQGBo8M6IpdrI29cfUWriajMSqXGYqNMFsloGj7kJVY/WKSe1OGraPtQMwR Y61255VJ83tpYo7a0HGSAKEOXCGLNg8cvXNG3F7bz/rP9eikbIvx8CYYWFPQ8IrO gB7l1Nz4XL0Z5J9jUi/QZ+dl/gM/OthaKH05WkTimmJJvlBfxphWkrELgJUwmPM= =hTpo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 19:54:04 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A182C2AA for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:54:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdc@koitsu.org) Received: from qmta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [IPv6:2001:558:fe2d:43:76:96:30:16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70CCF2A5 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:54:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta22.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.89]) by qmta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 2Ftb1l0011vN32cA1Ku3sV; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:54:03 +0000 Received: from koitsu.strangled.net ([67.180.84.87]) by omta22.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 2Ku21l0141t3BNj8iKu3NE; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:54:03 +0000 Received: by icarus.home.lan (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B585773A1C; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:54:02 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 11:54:02 -0800 From: Jeremy Chadwick To: Jung-uk Kim Subject: Re: Why can't gcc-4.2.1 build usable libreoffice? Message-ID: <20130219195402.GB39626@icarus.home.lan> References: <511CED39.2010909@aldan.algebra.com> <51238AE9.20205@aldan.algebra.com> <5123ADEC.2040103@aldan.algebra.com> <5123CF37.7000506@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5123CF37.7000506@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=comcast.net; s=q20121106; t=1361303643; bh=xn7zeeANsROllbrWLovks2eY7+NXRQ74iOCYMxyRZoE=; h=Received:Received:Received:Date:From:To:Subject:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=M0gAU/riw2mpsvnzevFDxiZowqr/qNl7XMR4bqMLRGBcKr575Bw1aj+gPDHYgyc7K B1TdVYIxoXTs6e0XyYYIdmshz2IMQrAaXRPw8CTUpgB0oYIV2e5fzjRkBzksoRJUR3 cukHhIkMofrIe8WV5Id7Wx4BhsmDveUz6lrbzHAoIhqmH+bmu3UB7CX6l1cV/2or2g DNWbvq73jVpQexQlbhcl0Dl522rc/IDn3bbW+GaU+MDxZBwOfBrp/CO9EkvLZLlrkZ XsvcYHApjl6CT+xeuZ+e/fOcdMJm7xohyYoeRdJyuhxotW37szQSEWOoUzCase6uXA rCxikEoaNLl4w== Cc: Adrian Chadd , office@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org, "Mikhail T." , Chris Rees X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 19:54:04 -0000 On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 02:15:03PM -0500, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > The short answer is we cannot support gcc 4.6+ unless we have a > dedicated *ports* compiler. > {blah blah} > What do we go from here? I don't know. One thing I know for sure is > we cannot support every possible build/runtime environment. > > Feel free to suggest your ideas and thoughts. Ideas and thoughts: 1. Do away with the base system concept. Yup, my usual broken record commentary. The sooner FreeBSD does away with this the better. Do not tell me "there are too many [compiler] possibilities to take into account", because... 2. Go look at DragonflyBSD and how they did it. As of February 2013 gcc 4.6 is their stock compiler (with gcc 4.4 also available because some ports don't build with 4.6), and their build infrastructure tests everything ("base system" as well as all their packages/ports). Here are references for my statements: http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/2013/02/07/11175.html http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/commits/2013-February/129381.html http://lists.dragonflybsd.org/pipermail/users/2012-December/017701.html As for "licensing concerns" with DFBSD and gcc, see these (comments are worth reading here too): http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/2012/10/02/10481.html http://www.shiningsilence.com/dbsdlog/2007/12/09/2557.html The DFBSD license: http://www.dragonflybsd.org/docs/developer/DragonFly_BSD_License/ If another BSD can play nice with a ""conflicting"" (note excessive use of quotes) license, then why can't FreeBSD? Who within the Project is calling these shots? Licensing zealotism benefits no user, but I can see it benefiting certain companies whose commercial products are reliant on FreeBSD. So out with it already. -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc@koitsu.org | | UNIX Systems Administrator http://jdc.koitsu.org/ | | Mountain View, CA, US | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP 4BD6C0CB | From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 20:05:16 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6D22616 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:05:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from smtp.rcn.com (smtp.rcn.com [69.168.97.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A1EE338 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:05:16 +0000 (UTC) X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=YKIdOG6x c=1 sm=0 a=fEl05wXzeJCkBz9gs2itqQ==:17 a=XBbVgglCP-sA:10 a=ZrqZzSrQiogA:10 a=YNqtyO0l_hcA:10 a=LaogzpLLAAAA:8 a=CqN0Xa_Ne8wA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=_4BPYxVLAAAA:8 a=4kWVwC1tfKeJio6dxwIA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=FdhU9TFdCwuk-XSU33gA:9 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=PeXs7KCET5mB0oEL:21 a=fEl05wXzeJCkBz9gs2itqQ==:117 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.mail=mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com; spf=neutral; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com header.from=mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.user=anat; auth=pass (PLAIN) Received-SPF: neutral (smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com: 209.6.63.29 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of aldan.algebra.com) Received: from [209.6.63.29] ([209.6.63.29:53217] helo=utka.zajac) by smtp.rcn.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.49 r(42060/42061)) with ESMTPA id 3E/2D-28101-AFAD3215; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:05:14 -0500 Message-ID: <5123DAF9.50400@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:05:13 -0500 From: "Mikhail T." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jung-uk Kim Subject: Re: Why can't gcc-4.2.1 build usable libreoffice? References: <511CED39.2010909@aldan.algebra.com> <51238AE9.20205@aldan.algebra.com> <5123ADEC.2040103@aldan.algebra.com> <5123CF37.7000506@FreeBSD.org> <5123D2F6.5040909@aldan.algebra.com> <5123D65D.2030301@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <5123D65D.2030301@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Adrian Chadd , office@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, Chris Rees X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:05:16 -0000 On 19.02.2013 14:45, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > Actually, I tried very hard to build sane LO with gcc 4.2 but it > wasn't fruitful. Eventually, I gave up on adding kludges after > kludges because LO is moving away from pre-C++11 compilers anyway.:-( Should not a pre-C++11 compiler simply /fail/ upon encountering C++11 code? > >And if there is a*good* reason to reject the base compiler, I'd > >expect such good reason to be documented -- preferably with > >bug-reports filed against either the FreeBSD and its toolchain or > >against the LibreOffice code. Or both... > I believe there were plenty PRs already. I can not find any :-( The ones against FreeBSD all talk about build failures (except the 176269 , filed today). There are no relevant bug-reports against LibreOffice, that mention "gcc-4.2.1" or "gcc 4.2.1 ". -mi From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 20:08:53 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E6E17ED for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:08:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from smtp.rcn.com (smtp.rcn.com [69.168.97.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5349F378 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:08:53 +0000 (UTC) X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=YKIdOG6x c=1 sm=0 a=fEl05wXzeJCkBz9gs2itqQ==:17 a=XBbVgglCP-sA:10 a=OtqBkeA7GFEA:10 a=YNqtyO0l_hcA:10 a=LaogzpLLAAAA:8 a=zUjDtZ8V68wA:10 a=4ExcaAnaYtSR3LoQ3XMA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=fBkZXPm_3GnfFzysjsIA:9 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=fEl05wXzeJCkBz9gs2itqQ==:117 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com header.from=mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.mail=mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com; spf=neutral; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.user=anat; auth=pass (PLAIN) Received-SPF: neutral (smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com: 209.6.63.29 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of aldan.algebra.com) Received: from [209.6.63.29] ([209.6.63.29:40049] helo=utka.zajac) by smtp.rcn.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.49 r(42060/42061)) with ESMTPA id B8/50-28101-3DBD3215; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:08:51 -0500 Message-ID: <5123DBD2.6050308@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 15:08:50 -0500 From: "Mikhail T." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeremy Chadwick Subject: Licensing zealotism (Re: Why can't gcc-4.2.1 build usable libreoffice?) References: <511CED39.2010909@aldan.algebra.com> <51238AE9.20205@aldan.algebra.com> <5123ADEC.2040103@aldan.algebra.com> <5123CF37.7000506@FreeBSD.org> <20130219195402.GB39626@icarus.home.lan> In-Reply-To: <20130219195402.GB39626@icarus.home.lan> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Chris Rees , Adrian Chadd , office@freebsd.org, stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 20:08:53 -0000 On 19.02.2013 14:54, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > Licensing zealotism benefits no user, but I can > see it benefiting certain companies whose commercial products are > reliant on FreeBSD. So out with it already. But support from (and even mere adoption by) large companies benefits FreeBSD in a number of ways. In any case, this is a matter for a separate thread, if any. -mi From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 21:42:31 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB6B75E2; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 21:42:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A469B94A; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 21:42:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r1JLgVvB072175; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 21:42:31 GMT (envelope-from linimon@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from linimon@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r1JLgVXf072171; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 21:42:31 GMT (envelope-from linimon) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 21:42:31 GMT Message-Id: <201302192142.r1JLgVXf072171@freefall.freebsd.org> To: linimon@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, office@FreeBSD.org From: linimon@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/176269: editors/libreoffice 3.6.5_2 does not start on i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 21:42:31 -0000 Old Synopsis: libreoffice-3.6.5_2 does not start on i386 New Synopsis: editors/libreoffice 3.6.5_2 does not start on i386 Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->office Responsible-Changed-By: linimon Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Feb 19 21:42:11 UTC 2013 Responsible-Changed-Why: Fix synopsis and assign. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=176269 From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 22:32:32 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62345636; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:32:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from hammer.pct.niksun.com (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B76E9BFA; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:32:31 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <5123FD13.8030508@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 17:30:43 -0500 From: Jung-uk Kim User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130128 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Mikhail T." Subject: Re: Why can't gcc-4.2.1 build usable libreoffice? References: <511CED39.2010909@aldan.algebra.com> <51238AE9.20205@aldan.algebra.com> <5123ADEC.2040103@aldan.algebra.com> <5123CF37.7000506@FreeBSD.org> <5123D2F6.5040909@aldan.algebra.com> <5123D65D.2030301@FreeBSD.org> <5123DAF9.50400@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <5123DAF9.50400@aldan.algebra.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Adrian Chadd , office@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, Chris Rees X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 22:32:32 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 2013-02-19 15:05:13 -0500, Mikhail T. wrote: > On 19.02.2013 14:45, Jung-uk Kim wrote: >> Actually, I tried very hard to build sane LO with gcc 4.2 but it >> wasn't fruitful. Eventually, I gave up on adding kludges after >> kludges because LO is moving away from pre-C++11 compilers >> anyway. :-( > Should not a pre-C++11 compiler simply /fail/ upon encountering > C++11 code? configure script detects the C++ compiler and sets various compiler flags. It basically tries to work around *known* issues as much as possible. However, it does not cover every possible combination. "Moving away" means "not actively tested". >>> And if there is a *good* reason to reject the base compiler, >>> I'd expect such good reason to be documented -- preferably >>> with bug-reports filed against either the FreeBSD and its >>> toolchain or against the LibreOffice code. Or both... >> I believe there were plenty PRs already. > I can not find any :-( The ones against FreeBSD > > > all talk about build failures (except the 176269 > , filed > today). There are no relevant bug-reports against LibreOffice, that > mention "gcc-4.2.1" > > > or "gcc 4.2.1 > ". Okay, > sorry. I really love to build LO with GCC 4.2, too. I really do. However, I don't see much point of mentioning that fact in PR. Jung-uk Kim -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRI/0TAAoJECXpabHZMqHOsy0IANi1KZSRdqARfxJ65r1MLi4a tQkCq7LmyMNA81ND1GKAatg52UDLF2GN5o9Yw71l/XiYN2JV667aGVaF9e96a789 ONnXRWaGw2DohTH8SpGu81Vstj5Vn/iots4b0bFdhz3HCW6lTgUsqlD/+n3dVVpo c4MlUAFtEhpqejvsX7g10kPqn8IZwZc7pBUfoeSw1sMIChajxmlfXDlHkvtKwVJu jHbu2PDMwty2kgJ1kRdYNt5yZXl9chSuSxqy23O5odfHyLWV6+SGk+SOb32MSp7H /oJ0UdFLFzqwGSqlK7bDOMIyL0yLaPz5WJd8X+HC/BmR5FUugdILe8lHOeJ/rq0= =ZyWD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 19 23:50:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7948F8F3 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 23:50:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C5C219B for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 23:50:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r1JNo2MN094357 for ; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 23:50:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r1JNo273094356; Tue, 19 Feb 2013 23:50:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 23:50:02 GMT Message-Id: <201302192350.r1JNo273094356@freefall.freebsd.org> To: office@FreeBSD.org From: "Mikhail T." Subject: Re: ports/176269: editors/libreoffice 3.6.5_2 does not start on i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Mikhail T." List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 23:50:02 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/176269; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Mikhail T." To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, rotkap@gmx.de Cc: Subject: Re: ports/176269: editors/libreoffice 3.6.5_2 does not start on i386 Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2013 18:43:46 -0500 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------030307090009000507050601 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Heino, the office team are likely to need to know the compiler you used (clang or gcc), the compiler flags, and the options you picked. It may also help greatly, if you could provide the crash stack -- it is very likely, that after a failure to start, a file soffice.bin.core is left in the current directory. Could you load it into gdb: % echo where | gdb /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/soffice.bin soffice.bin.core ...... (gdb) where and share the output? Thanks! -mi --------------030307090009000507050601 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Heino, the office team are likely to need to know the compiler you used (clang or gcc), the compiler flags, and the options you picked.

It may also help greatly, if you could provide the crash stack -- it is very likely, that after a failure to start, a file soffice.bin.core is left in the current directory. Could you load it into gdb:
% echo where | gdb /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/soffice.bin soffice.bin.core
......
(gdb) where
and share the output? Thanks!
-mi
--------------030307090009000507050601-- From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 05:42:54 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0924EAF1 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 05:42:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from smtp.rcn.com (smtp.rcn.com [69.168.97.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1FF0204 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 05:42:53 +0000 (UTC) X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=YKIdOG6x c=1 sm=0 a=sCkZyOwU0IjLO1BAXY68/A==:17 a=d8Isu0L9vBEA:10 a=ZrqZzSrQiogA:10 a=YNqtyO0l_hcA:10 a=LaogzpLLAAAA:8 a=CqN0Xa_Ne8wA:10 a=bYbNIRuHh8-otiD3ZRIA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=mfG1F7Z133jGNL0paR0A:9 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=SV7veod9ZcQA:10 a=sCkZyOwU0IjLO1BAXY68/A==:117 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com header.from=mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.mail=mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com; spf=neutral; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.user=anat; auth=pass (PLAIN) Received-SPF: neutral (smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com: 173.63.211.146 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of aldan.algebra.com) Received: from [173.63.211.146] ([173.63.211.146:11596] helo=[192.168.1.8]) by smtp.rcn.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.49 r(42060/42061)) with ESMTPA id 1F/F2-28101-C5264215; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:42:52 -0500 Message-ID: <5124625B.8080506@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 00:42:51 -0500 From: "Mikhail T." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130209 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jung-uk Kim Subject: Re: Why can't gcc-4.2.1 build usable libreoffice? References: <511CED39.2010909@aldan.algebra.com> <51238AE9.20205@aldan.algebra.com> <5123ADEC.2040103@aldan.algebra.com> <5123CF37.7000506@FreeBSD.org> <5123D2F6.5040909@aldan.algebra.com> <5123D65D.2030301@FreeBSD.org> <5123DAF9.50400@aldan.algebra.com> <5123FD13.8030508@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <5123FD13.8030508@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Adrian Chadd , office@FreeBSD.org, stable@FreeBSD.org, Chris Rees X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 05:42:54 -0000 19.02.2013 17:30, Jung-uk Kim ???????(??): > I really love to build LO with GCC 4.2, too. I really do. However, I > don't see much point of mentioning that fact in PR. You mentioned earlier, that you "believe there were plenty PRs already". Are the patches contained in them currently in the port's files/ subdirectory? I'd like to see, where I can get with LibreOffice people -- but I don't want to file duplicate PRs, obviously... -mi From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 12:36:43 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6513B10 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:36:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.ysv.FreeBSD.org (portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:6601]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B40E2EA5 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:36:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from indexbuild (uid 5020) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) id 1aa326 by portsindexbuild.ysv.FreeBSD.org (DragonFly Mail Agent v0.7); Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:36:43 +0000 To: office@FreeBSD.org, Subject: Ports with duplicate LATEST_LINKs Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:36:43 +0000 Message-Id: <5124c35b.1aa326.63f68bb0@portsindexbuild.ysv.FreeBSD.org> From: X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:36:43 -0000 Dear port maintainers, The following list includes ports maintained by you that have duplicate LATEST_LINK values. They should either be modified to use a unique LATEST_LINK or suppressed using NO_LATEST_LINK, to avoid overwriting each other in the packages/Latest directory. If your ports conflict with ports maintained by another person, please coordinate your efforts with them. Thanks, Erwin "Annoying Reminder Guy III" Lansing LATEST_LINK PORTNAME MAINTAINER ========================================================================== libmspub print/libmspub office@FreeBSD.org libmspub textproc/libmspub office@FreeBSD.org Total: 2 ports From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 15:10:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D26B2D53 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:10:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6EC6A1D for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:10:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r1KFA1AB091132 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:10:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r1KFA1BY091131; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:10:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:10:01 GMT Message-Id: <201302201510.r1KFA1BY091131@freefall.freebsd.org> To: office@FreeBSD.org From: Heino Tiedemann Subject: Re: ports/176269: editors/libreoffice 3.6.5_2 does not start on i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Heino Tiedemann List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:10:02 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/176269; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Heino Tiedemann To: "Mikhail T." Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/176269: editors/libreoffice 3.6.5_2 does not start on i386 Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:00:24 +0100 "Mikhail T." wrote: > Heino, the office team are likely to need to know the compiler you > used (clang or gcc), the compiler flags, and the options you picked. I cannot see that I choosed any compiler (make config in editors/libreoffice) So it must be the default. ,----[ /etc/makce.conf ] | CUPS_OVERWRITE_BASE=yes | NO_LPR=yes | WITH_CUPS=yes | WITH_OPENSSL_BASE=yes | | OVERRIDE_LINUX_BASE_PORT=f10 | OVERRIDE_LINUX_NONBASE_PORTS=f10 | | WITH_PKGNG=yes | # added by use.perl 2012-11-19 19:49:52 | PERL_VERSION=5.16.2 `---- > It may also help greatly, if you could provide the crash stack -- it > is very likely, that after a failure to start, a file soffice.bin.core > is left in the current directory. Could you load it into gdb: > > % echo where | gdb /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/soffice.bin > soffice.bin.core > ...... > (gdb) where > and share the output? Thanks! % echo where | gdb /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/soffice.bin soffice.bin.core GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i386-marcel-freebsd"...(no debugging symbols found)... Core was generated by `soffice.bin'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libmergedlo.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libmergedlo.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_sal.so.3...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_sal.so.3 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 Reading symbols from /lib/libm.so.5...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libm.so.5 Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.7...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libc.so.7 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libicuuc.so.50...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libicuuc.so.50 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libjpeg.so.11...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libjpeg.so.11 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.5...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.5 Reading symbols from /lib/libz.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libz.so.6 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libdb41.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libdb41.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libbasegfxlo.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libbasegfxlo.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libcomphelpgcc3.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libcomphelpgcc3.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_cppu.so.3...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_cppu.so.3 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libi18nisolang1gcc3.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libi18nisolang1gcc3.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libi18nutilgcc3.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libi18nutilgcc3.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libjvmfwk.so.3...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libjvmfwk.so.3 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_salhelpergcc3.so.3...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_salhelpergcc3.so.3 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libsaxlo.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libsaxlo.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libsotlo.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libsotlo.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libsvllo.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libsvllo.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libtllo.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libtllo.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libucbhelper4gcc3.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libucbhelper4gcc3.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libutllo.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libutllo.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libvcllo.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libvcllo.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libxmlreader.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libxmlreader.so Reading symbols from /lib/libgcc_s.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 Reading symbols from /lib/libthr.so.3...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libthr.so.3 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libicudata.so.50...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libicudata.so.50 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.3...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.3 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libreg.so.3...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libreg.so.3 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libicule.so.50...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libicule.so.50 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/liblcms2.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/liblcms2.so.2 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libgraphite2.so.3...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libgraphite2.so.3 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libcairo.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libcairo.so.2 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libfontconfig.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libfreetype.so.9...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libfreetype.so.9 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libjvmaccessgcc3.so.3...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libjvmaccessgcc3.so.3 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libstore.so.3...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libstore.so.3 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libpixman-1.so.9...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libpixman-1.so.9 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libexpat.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libexpat.so.6 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libbz2.so.4...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libbz2.so.4 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libpng15.so.15...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libpng15.so.15 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libxcb-shm.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libxcb-shm.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libxcb-render.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libxcb-render.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libXrender.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libXrender.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libX11.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libX11.so.6 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libxcb.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libxcb.so.2 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libXau.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libXau.so.6 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libXdmcp.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libXdmcp.so.6 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libpthread-stubs.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libpthread-stubs.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/librpcsvc.so.5...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/librpcsvc.so.5 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libsupc++.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libsupc++.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libsal_textenc.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libsal_textenc.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libvclplug_gtklo.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libvclplug_gtklo.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libXext.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libXext.so.6 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libXinerama.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libXinerama.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libXi.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libXi.so.6 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libXrandr.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libXrandr.so.2 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libXcursor.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libXcursor.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libXcomposite.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libXcomposite.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libXdamage.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libXdamage.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libXfixes.so.3...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libXfixes.so.3 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libgio-2.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libgio-2.0.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libgdk_pixbuf_xlib-2.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libgdk_pixbuf_xlib-2.0.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libvclplug_genlo.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libvclplug_genlo.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libSM.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libSM.so.6 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libICE.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libICE.so.6 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.9...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.9 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libpcre.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libpcre.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libpcre.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libpcre.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libpcre.so.3...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libpcre.so.3 Reading symbols from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 #0 0x2e4b7f98 in XFree@plt () from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libvclplug_genlo.so [New Thread 2d404f00 (LWP 101229/soffice.bin)] [New Thread 2d404300 (LWP 100508/soffice.bin)] (gdb) Hangup detected on fd 0 error detected on stdin Heino From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 15:30:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 249EB627 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:30:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 165D8B35 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:30:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r1KFU1ao095319 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:30:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r1KFU1cI095313; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:30:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:30:01 GMT Message-Id: <201302201530.r1KFU1cI095313@freefall.freebsd.org> To: office@FreeBSD.org From: Heino Tiedemann Subject: Re: ports/176269: editors/libreoffice 3.6.5_2 does not start on i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Heino Tiedemann List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:30:01 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/176269; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Heino Tiedemann To: "Mikhail T." Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/176269: editors/libreoffice 3.6.5_2 does not start on i386 Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:27:20 +0100 "Mikhail T." wrote: > Thank you. So you must've used the clang compiler. As for options, the > port asked you for some port-specific ones, the result is now in > /var/db/ports/libreoffice/options -- you can just cat that file. > > For gdb I gave you incorrect instructions. You should load the core into > the debugger: > > gdb /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/soffice.bin soffice.bin.core > > and then, on gdb's prompt, type: > > where > > Thanks! Yours, > > -mi % gdb /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/soffice.bin soffice.bin.core GNU gdb 6.1.1 [FreeBSD] Copyright 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. GDB is free software, covered by the GNU General Public License, and you are welcome to change it and/or distribute copies of it under certain conditions. Type "show copying" to see the conditions. There is absolutely no warranty for GDB. Type "show warranty" for details. This GDB was configured as "i386-marcel-freebsd"...(no debugging symbols found)... Core was generated by `soffice.bin'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libmergedlo.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libmergedlo.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_sal.so.3...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_sal.so.3 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 Reading symbols from /lib/libm.so.5...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libm.so.5 Reading symbols from /lib/libc.so.7...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libc.so.7 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libicuuc.so.50...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libicuuc.so.50 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libjpeg.so.11...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libjpeg.so.11 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.5...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libxml2.so.5 Reading symbols from /lib/libz.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libz.so.6 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libdb41.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libdb41.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libbasegfxlo.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libbasegfxlo.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libcomphelpgcc3.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libcomphelpgcc3.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_cppu.so.3...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_cppu.so.3 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_cppuhelpergcc3.so.3 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libi18nisolang1gcc3.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libi18nisolang1gcc3.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libi18nutilgcc3.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libi18nutilgcc3.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libjvmfwk.so.3...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libjvmfwk.so.3 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_salhelpergcc3.so.3...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libuno_salhelpergcc3.so.3 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libsaxlo.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libsaxlo.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libsotlo.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libsotlo.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libsvllo.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libsvllo.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libtllo.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libtllo.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libucbhelper4gcc3.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libucbhelper4gcc3.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libutllo.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libutllo.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libvcllo.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libvcllo.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libxmlreader.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libxmlreader.so Reading symbols from /lib/libgcc_s.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 Reading symbols from /lib/libthr.so.3...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /lib/libthr.so.3 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libicudata.so.50...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libicudata.so.50 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.3...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libiconv.so.3 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libreg.so.3...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libreg.so.3 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libicule.so.50...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libicule.so.50 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/liblcms2.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/liblcms2.so.2 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libgraphite2.so.3...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libgraphite2.so.3 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libcairo.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libcairo.so.2 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libfontconfig.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libfontconfig.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libfreetype.so.9...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libfreetype.so.9 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libjvmaccessgcc3.so.3...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libjvmaccessgcc3.so.3 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libstore.so.3...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libstore.so.3 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libpixman-1.so.9...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libpixman-1.so.9 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libexpat.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libexpat.so.6 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libbz2.so.4...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libbz2.so.4 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libpng15.so.15...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libpng15.so.15 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libxcb-shm.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libxcb-shm.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libxcb-render.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libxcb-render.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libXrender.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libXrender.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libX11.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libX11.so.6 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libxcb.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libxcb.so.2 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libXau.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libXau.so.6 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libXdmcp.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libXdmcp.so.6 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libpthread-stubs.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libpthread-stubs.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/librpcsvc.so.5...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/librpcsvc.so.5 Reading symbols from /usr/lib/libsupc++.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/lib/libsupc++.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libsal_textenc.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/../ure-link/lib/libsal_textenc.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libvclplug_gtklo.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libvclplug_gtklo.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libXext.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libXext.so.6 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libXinerama.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libXinerama.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libXi.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libXi.so.6 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libXrandr.so.2...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libXrandr.so.2 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libXcursor.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libXcursor.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libXcomposite.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libXcomposite.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libXdamage.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libXdamage.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libXfixes.so.3...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libXfixes.so.3 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libatk-1.0.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libgio-2.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libgio-2.0.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libgdk_pixbuf_xlib-2.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libgdk_pixbuf_xlib-2.0.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libgmodule-2.0.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libgthread-2.0.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libvclplug_genlo.so...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libvclplug_genlo.so Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libSM.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libSM.so.6 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libICE.so.6...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libICE.so.6 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.9...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libintl.so.9 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libpcre.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libpcre.so.1 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libpcre.so.0...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg/libpcre.so.0 Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libpcre.so.3...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libpcre.so.3 Reading symbols from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1...(no debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 #0 0x2e4b7f98 in XFree@plt () from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libvclplug_genlo.so [New Thread 2d404f00 (LWP 101229/soffice.bin)] [New Thread 2d404300 (LWP 100508/soffice.bin)] (gdb) where #0 0x2e4b7f98 in XFree@plt () from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libvclplug_genlo.so #1 0x2e4bfbc4 in SalDisplay::BestVisual () from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libvclplug_genlo.so #2 0x2e4c07d0 in SalDisplay::initScreen () from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libvclplug_genlo.so #3 0x2d86d005 in GtkSalDisplay::initScreen () from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libvclplug_gtklo.so #4 0x2e4cc31e in vcl_sal::WMAdaptor::WMAdaptor () from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libvclplug_genlo.so #5 0x2e4cd085 in vcl_sal::NetWMAdaptor::NetWMAdaptor () from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libvclplug_genlo.so #6 0x2e4cc182 in vcl_sal::WMAdaptor::createWMAdaptor () from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libvclplug_genlo.so #7 0x2e4c0461 in SalDisplay::Init () from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libvclplug_genlo.so #8 0x2d86cd15 in GtkSalDisplay::GtkSalDisplay () from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libvclplug_gtklo.so #9 0x2d86e5ed in GtkData::Init () from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libvclplug_gtklo.so #10 0x2d86f666 in create_SalInstance () from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libvclplug_gtklo.so #11 0x2b78450b in tryInstance () from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libvcllo.so #12 0x2b78420a in CreateSalInstance () from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libvcllo.so #13 0x2b477868 in InitVCL () from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libvcllo.so #14 0x2b477607 in ImplSVMain () from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libvcllo.so #15 0x2b47831c in SVMain () from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libvcllo.so #16 0x28f4d2e5 in soffice_main () from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libmergedlo.so #17 0x0804861b in main () (gdb) Heino From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 20:41:38 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4978A00; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 20:41:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@rulingia.com) Received: from vps.rulingia.com (host-122-100-2-194.octopus.com.au [122.100.2.194]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DD3D339; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 20:41:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.rulingia.com (c220-239-237-213.belrs5.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.239.237.213]) by vps.rulingia.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1KKfE4s075031 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 07:41:15 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from peter@rulingia.com) X-Bogosity: Ham, spamicity=0.000000 Received: from server.rulingia.com (localhost.rulingia.com [127.0.0.1]) by server.rulingia.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1KKf9En055687 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 07:41:09 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from peter@server.rulingia.com) Received: (from peter@localhost) by server.rulingia.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id r1KKf8SD055686; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 07:41:08 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from peter) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 07:41:08 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy To: "Mikhail T." Subject: Re: Why can't gcc-4.2.1 build usable libreoffice? Message-ID: <20130220204108.GA55280@server.rulingia.com> References: <511CED39.2010909@aldan.algebra.com> <51238AE9.20205@aldan.algebra.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <51238AE9.20205@aldan.algebra.com> X-PGP-Key: http://www.rulingia.com/keys/peter.pgp User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: stable@freebsd.org, "office@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 20:41:38 -0000 --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2013-Feb-19 09:23:37 -0500, "Mikhail T." wro= te: >See, my understanding always was, the only possible reasons for a >compiler to produce a non-starting executable are: > > 1. The code is buggy. > 2. The compiler is buggy. > 3. Both of the above. > >My question was, which is it? You left out: 4. Code relies on language features that are not supported by the compiler. (It's not a bug that gcc 4.2.1 (eg) doesn't suppert C++11) 5. Code relies on specific compiler features Feel free to answer your own question if it's important to you. No-one else is particularly interested. >Yes, 4.6 is supposed to work and is supported by the office@ team. My >question was about 4.2.1, which happens to be the base cc/c++ in 8.x and >in 9.x as well, if world was built WITHOUT_CLANG. I too observe the >4.2.1-compiled office die at start-up -- the splash screen starts nicely >and exits after kicking off the actual soffice.bin which segfaults. As others have indicated, the toolchain provided in the base system is intended only for building the base system. If it works for you for other purposes, that's good. If you believe it has bugs, feel free to submit PRs. If the bugs don't affect the base system, they are unlikely --=20 Peter Jeremy --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlElNOQACgkQ/opHv/APuIfzHgCcCGcqH5XBorNK98mS6JKO0PZl OsQAnRlAysKhCL34TYSWSTUui8YYPBIC =c1RB -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qDbXVdCdHGoSgWSk-- From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 21:53:31 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DBBAD7D for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 21:53:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com) Received: from smtp.rcn.com (smtp.rcn.com [69.168.97.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 52346981 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 21:53:31 +0000 (UTC) X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=YKIdOG6x c=1 sm=0 a=sCkZyOwU0IjLO1BAXY68/A==:17 a=d8Isu0L9vBEA:10 a=ZrqZzSrQiogA:10 a=YNqtyO0l_hcA:10 a=LaogzpLLAAAA:8 a=CqN0Xa_Ne8wA:10 a=BCZJ3XGa9iN6QQibAKIA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=RNU3s1wuz065lYDb:21 a=ChWfih-8Jx05fFTa:21 a=B-X5g-zTAAAA:8 a=Glztyuv-Os6YTJZVjKoA:9 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=Y83UZZ6Wq9TEBMyS:21 a=sCkZyOwU0IjLO1BAXY68/A==:117 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com header.from=mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.mail=mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com; spf=neutral; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.user=anat; auth=pass (PLAIN) Received-SPF: neutral (smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com: 173.63.211.146 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of aldan.algebra.com) Received: from [173.63.211.146] ([173.63.211.146:24581] helo=[192.168.1.8]) by smtp.rcn.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.49 r(42060/42061)) with ESMTPA id 47/E1-28101-9D545215; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:53:29 -0500 Message-ID: <512545D9.4060401@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 16:53:29 -0500 From: "Mikhail T." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130209 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Jeremy Subject: Re: Why can't gcc-4.2.1 build usable libreoffice? References: <511CED39.2010909@aldan.algebra.com> <51238AE9.20205@aldan.algebra.com> <20130220204108.GA55280@server.rulingia.com> In-Reply-To: <20130220204108.GA55280@server.rulingia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: stable@freebsd.org, "office@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 21:53:31 -0000 20.02.2013 15:41, Peter Jeremy ???????(??): > You left out: > 4. Code relies on language features that are not supported by the compiler. > (It's not a bug that gcc 4.2.1 (eg) doesn't suppert C++11) If a compiler does not support a feature, it is supposed to error-out upon encountering it, not generate invalid code. If this was, in fact, the reason for the problem, it would've been a compiler bug. > 5. Code relies on specific compiler features Depending on what you mean by "compiler features" here, this is simply a duplicate of either your own 4 or my 1. > Feel free to answer your own question if it's important to you. No-one > else is particularly interested. Is that why you decided to chime-in? Because you are not "particularly interested"? Maybe, you should've remained outside this lovely discussion, if this was really true? Jung-uk Kim answered my question, though. > > As others have indicated, the toolchain provided in the base system is > intended only for building the base system. This was never true before and it is rather sad, if it were really becoming the truth now. More than likely, though, this is just a cheap excuse. Kind of like: "you did not pay for the code, did you, so don't expect it to work". -mi From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 22:55:59 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D7F4EEF; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:55:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D43FD3; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:55:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r1KMttMT045113; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:55:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r1KMttSY045112; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:55:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 14:55:55 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-office@freebsd.org Subject: Building libreoffice dies with logl@GLIBCXX_3.4 Message-ID: <20130220225555.GB44319@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 22:55:59 -0000 Why is libreoffice looking for glibc? Stop in /usr/ports/editors/libreoffice. laptop:root[246] cd work/libreoffice-core-3.6.5.2/l10ntools/ laptop:root[247] gmake [ build LNK ] Executable/HelpIndexer S=/usr/ports/editors/libreoffice/work/libreoffice-core-3.6.5.2 && O=/tmp/lobuild/solver/unxfbsdi.pro && W=/tmp/lobuild/workdir/unxfbsdi.pro && mkdir -p $W/LinkTarget/Executable/ && g++46 '-Wl,-z,origin,-rpath,$ORIGIN/../lib:$ORIGIN' -Wl,-rpath-link,$O/lib -Wl,-rpath-link,/lib:/usr/lib -Wl,-z,combreloc -L$S/solenv/unxfbsdi/lib -L$O/lib -L$S/solenv/unxfbsdi/lib -L/usr/local/lib -Wl,--hash-style=gnu -Wl,--dynamic-list-cpp-new -Wl,--dynamic-list-cpp-typeinfo -Wl,-Bsymbolic-functions $W/CxxObject/l10ntools/source/help/HelpIndexer_main.o -Wl,--start-group -Wl,--end-group -Wl,--no-as-needed -lexpat -lxslt -lz -liconv -lm -L/usr/local/lib -lxml2 -L/usr/local/lib -lxml2 -L/usr/local/lib/db42 -ldb-4.2 -L/usr/local/lib/ -lclucene-core -lclucene-contribs-lib -luno_sal -lhelplinkerlo -o $W/LinkTarget/Executable/HelpIndexer /usr/local/lib/libclucene-core.so: undefined reference to `logl@GLIBCXX_3.4' collect2: ld returned 1 exit status gmake: *** [/tmp/lobuild/workdir/unxfbsdi.pro/LinkTarget/Executable/HelpIndexer] Error 1 Is this a link order issue? -lm comes before -lclucene-core -lclucene-contribs-lib in the above command line. Note. my libm has a logl and it is properly symbol versioned. -- Steve From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 23:02:57 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A62D74A; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 23:02:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ea0-f175.google.com (mail-ea0-f175.google.com [209.85.215.175]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92DD8105; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 23:02:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ea0-f175.google.com with SMTP id d1so3503959eab.20 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:02:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=8IVYT3/1ra3maI735yj/Xobbf+bzFikNM+EpN/V0TnA=; b=WdvyBfx04w96rLS1g3mEj0DaKcklNN22PgLkMvpttx/NUfLzV9xEqIBvyEqia9dBNg QJpX/JECzRfrVKzXKQ4Bh/oalUQvZZNdVBEQK77PqgpPkUGmGV5Ni9kRBidRPuPt9HG2 FmTy88W1+h2VZx5CJsv9KRurh/jYFjclXoGrhOwUp/bG77oMmY0WYiGvHHS3Gw2F4ZnZ mPFrErYM8l/KeZMfNK0J5Pp94o8P8Q98F1ASkv46wWZEhlThDU0ugYJ4jNV8SpoUDAeU 4IJiJV/+4LSGsrCBX4QcXO9uIBpOSoywtkEiccexP1nwBqPRY1lwtMNWYyTTfTP4cEvc g9uA== X-Received: by 10.14.220.135 with SMTP id o7mr74447271eep.3.1361401369718; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:02:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from ithaqua.etoilebsd.net (ithaqua.etoilebsd.net. [37.59.37.188]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q5sm111800740eep.11.2013.02.20.15.02.48 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:02:48 -0800 (PST) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 00:02:46 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Steve Kargl Subject: Re: Building libreoffice dies with logl@GLIBCXX_3.4 Message-ID: <20130220230246.GB48099@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <20130220225555.GB44319@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FkmkrVfFsRoUs1wW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130220225555.GB44319@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-office@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 23:02:57 -0000 --FkmkrVfFsRoUs1wW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 02:55:55PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > Why is libreoffice looking for glibc? >=20 It is not looking for glibc but libstdc++ it happends because you have mixed compilers on your system, meaning that some of the dependencies of libreoff= ice are not linked against the based libstdc++ while libreoffice is trying to l= ink to it. regards, Bapt --FkmkrVfFsRoUs1wW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlElVhYACgkQ8kTtMUmk6EwWkACfRBz9IHkLU7JKOaKPwEVCOG/B zMwAoLxXyHRkg19/xhK9gYYaOpiiy1eh =zGRO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FkmkrVfFsRoUs1wW-- From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 23:10:23 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1C13A2F; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 23:10:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A7EF151; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 23:10:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r1KNANpl045798; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:10:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r1KNANsq045797; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:10:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:10:23 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: Baptiste Daroussin Subject: Re: Building libreoffice dies with logl@GLIBCXX_3.4 Message-ID: <20130220231023.GA45309@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20130220225555.GB44319@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20130220230246.GB48099@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130220230246.GB48099@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-office@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 23:10:23 -0000 On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:02:46AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 02:55:55PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > > Why is libreoffice looking for glibc? > > > > It is not looking for glibc but libstdc++ it happends because you have mixed > compilers on your system, meaning that some of the dependencies of libreoffice > are not linked against the based libstdc++ while libreoffice is trying to link > to it. Which compilers? I have removed all of base clang and completely rebuilt this system with gcc. The only compilers available are base gcc and lang/gcc. -- Steve From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 23:12:51 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B58DB5E; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 23:12:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ea0-f176.google.com (mail-ea0-f176.google.com [209.85.215.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7CD4173; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 23:12:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ea0-f176.google.com with SMTP id a13so3576316eaa.7 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:12:44 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to :user-agent; bh=VVLrJS5EGvlkiz+TeUXIY4knMyoeB71E2ZSyaU9rhl4=; b=Dziq149KDdS4IDn8ScedtLmMhSkGB0TO/G3//qV7BaLJAnW0rAKyDQsKn+Fs4OJmz+ wd8lRsN6AfDMJ45TJ+h4dyoJ971culEuS9Py5l/kKBiPK0MsVvmSRNrnyy6GLM+2eMHL UuuE5TS8c6pZFhgCA2KGwDXrv1QLzeqhkh2Lzm5Qp0vyvT4EgL/u5hcVCXrJXV2lU4ui YSKt86giviHWW39XMXpF7b2PNeGfTPcHx6xD7uVs2jn8qcG8Ksx8PXYk3SWQX0z+MlSE hUqsipe+zcDDRVkrvjvPXL3DO7U6yAxZjV2k3Lc8ke68yNtr3i3n9OoX89azXVKCTKNC Q0Dw== X-Received: by 10.14.218.71 with SMTP id j47mr73529082eep.28.1361401963738; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:12:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from ithaqua.etoilebsd.net (ithaqua.etoilebsd.net. [37.59.37.188]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q5sm111832017eep.11.2013.02.20.15.12.41 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:12:42 -0800 (PST) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 00:12:39 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Steve Kargl Subject: Re: Building libreoffice dies with logl@GLIBCXX_3.4 Message-ID: <20130220231239.GD48099@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <20130220225555.GB44319@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20130220230246.GB48099@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20130220231023.GA45309@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="cHMo6Wbp1wrKhbfi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130220231023.GA45309@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-office@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 23:12:51 -0000 --cHMo6Wbp1wrKhbfi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 03:10:23PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:02:46AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 02:55:55PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > Why is libreoffice looking for glibc? > > >=20 > >=20 > > It is not looking for glibc but libstdc++ it happends because you have = mixed > > compilers on your system, meaning that some of the dependencies of libr= eoffice > > are not linked against the based libstdc++ while libreoffice is trying = to link > > to it. >=20 > Which compilers? I have removed all of base clang and completely > rebuilt this system with gcc. The only compilers available are > base gcc and lang/gcc. Some of the dependencies of libreoffice are being linked against libstdc++ = that comes with base gcc while others are linked against libstdc++ from lang/gcc= , and they are not compatible at some point. regards, Bapt --cHMo6Wbp1wrKhbfi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlElWGcACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ew8ggCgooikcrwDqwcW9UUtbpkWzNMg hj4Ani0Hz3s+87Hq6O3lXgPVKvbc6i/k =Dfr5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --cHMo6Wbp1wrKhbfi-- From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 23:40:38 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED7EE7AE; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 23:40:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-x234.google.com (we-in-x0234.1e100.net [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::234]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 614342F8; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 23:40:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f180.google.com with SMTP id k14so6940553wer.25 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:40:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=LhOv0Yne3We7vblLfwEsZgvwX7P2M4UHwyEHu+KeyiQ=; b=S3+qw7RjYkqv8Vwc7SbEz6xoaXJQSQ9gCxLdhD06wm/Rh3rUa0bk6BnRhaheFPUxSd U/qk2ECZY9NCtzWjkDtLYx/tV2tVHYYHdCvWceU2B3zBjWzHrn7q8SjvR5Xoab9Jl8hy 1xY8RSOGTZG2SRGk/4Ah2v60Ujy4uPRUeT1m8M85oGQvdjFdGHtfRHT7tPv55v05sRFa LD09sf/sKtriU5FgVxKZwaVpsNnfJPXlrUCkrb2A4mMp4nEAYNlvJkcvw+kMmk657NMf vB8Fr8AmZe0Wp5NZym8/MK2tFRLi10baTB2kcJOlsu2oQQ9qOYovtxGjBGpB1vmx+V9r vElw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.170.165 with SMTP id an5mr1102267wjc.41.1361403637553; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:40:37 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.216.236.88 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:40:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <512545D9.4060401@aldan.algebra.com> References: <511CED39.2010909@aldan.algebra.com> <51238AE9.20205@aldan.algebra.com> <20130220204108.GA55280@server.rulingia.com> <512545D9.4060401@aldan.algebra.com> Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:40:37 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: BHtGpCXvPLHEMKc38ICz7Ck3Mss Message-ID: Subject: Re: Why can't gcc-4.2.1 build usable libreoffice? From: Adrian Chadd To: "Mikhail T." Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: stable@freebsd.org, "office@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 23:40:39 -0000 On 20 February 2013 13:53, Mikhail T. wrote: >> As others have indicated, the toolchain provided in the base system is >> intended only for building the base system. > This was never true before and it is rather sad, if it were really > becoming the truth now. More than likely, though, this is just a cheap > excuse. Kind of like: "you did not pay for the code, did you, so don't > expect it to work". That's because of a mad dash for new C/C++ functionailty post 4.2 which also happened to coincide with a licence change to GPLv3. Adrian From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 20 23:43:00 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 868888E0; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 23:43:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B013323; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 23:43:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost.apl.washington.edu [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r1KNh0RC051953; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:43:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r1KNh0Fi051952; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:43:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 15:43:00 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: Baptiste Daroussin Subject: Re: Building libreoffice dies with logl@GLIBCXX_3.4 Message-ID: <20130220234300.GA29997@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20130220225555.GB44319@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20130220230246.GB48099@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> <20130220231023.GA45309@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20130220231239.GD48099@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130220231239.GD48099@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-office@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 23:43:00 -0000 On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:12:39AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 03:10:23PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 12:02:46AM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 02:55:55PM -0800, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > > Why is libreoffice looking for glibc? > > > > > > > > > > It is not looking for glibc but libstdc++ it happends because you have mixed > > > compilers on your system, meaning that some of the dependencies of libreoffice > > > are not linked against the based libstdc++ while libreoffice is trying to link > > > to it. > > > > Which compilers? I have removed all of base clang and completely > > rebuilt this system with gcc. The only compilers available are > > base gcc and lang/gcc. > > Some of the dependencies of libreoffice are being linked against > libstdc++ that comes with base gcc while others are linked against > libstdc++ from lang/gcc, and they are not compatible at some point. Thanks for the explanation. It would seem to me that if editors/libreoffice/Makefile contains .if defined(WITH_GCC) USE_GCC= 4.6+ DISTFILES+= bd30e9cf5523cdfc019b94f5e1d7fd19-cppunit-1.12.1.tar.gz:ext CONFIGURE_ENV+= CXXCPP="${CPP}" .else .if exists(/usr/bin/clang) && ${OSVERSION} >= 900014 CC= /usr/bin/clang CPP= /usr/bin/clang-cpp CXX= /usr/bin/clang++ CONFIGURE_ENV+= CXXCPP="${CPP}" .else # XXX Clang PR13308 (http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=13308) BUILD_DEPENDS+= clang>=3.2:${PORTSDIR}/lang/clang CC= ${LOCALBASE}/bin/clang CPP= ${CC} -E CXX= ${LOCALBASE}/bin/clang++ CONFIGURE_ENV+= CXXCPP="${CXX} -E" .endif then textproc/clucene/Makefile should contain at least .if defined(WITH_GCC) USE_GCC= 4.6+ .endif Although this may also be insufficient, because I just rebuilt clucene with lang/gcc and it yield ptop:kargl[217] ls *lucene*.so libclucene-contribs-lib.so@ libclucene-shared.so@ libclucene-core.so@ laptop:kargl[218] ldd libclucene-contribs-lib.so | grep libstd libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x48c00000) laptop:kargl[219] ldd libclucene-core.so | grep libstd libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/lib/libstdc++.so.6 (0x48c00000) laptop:kargl[220] ldd libclucene-shared.so | grep libstd libstdc++.so.6 => /usr/local/lib/gcc46/libstdc++.so.6 (0x48208000) which means clucene does not honor CXX etc. -- Steve From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 12:23:39 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 154295D9 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:23:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsmonj.FreeBSD.org (portsmonj.freebsd.org [69.147.83.46]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09EA78CD for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:23:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from portsmonj.freebsd.org (portsmonj.freebsd.org [69.147.83.46]) by portsmonj.FreeBSD.org (8.14.5/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r1L8TNYV085934 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 08:29:23 GMT (envelope-from linimon@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 08:29:23 GMT Message-Id: <201302210829.r1L8TNYV085934@portsmonj.FreeBSD.org> From: linimon@FreeBSD.org To: office@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD ports that you maintain which are currently scheduled for deletion X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: portmgr-feedback@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:23:39 -0000 Dear FreeBSD port maintainer: As part of an ongoing effort to reduce the number of problems in the FreeBSD ports system, we periodically schedule removal of ports that have been judged to have outlived their usefulness. Often, this is due to a better alternative having become available and/or the cessation of development on the existing port. In some cases, ports are marked for removal because they fail to build and install correctly from their sources, or otherwise fail in operation. The ports, and the reason and date that they have been scheduled for removal, are listed below. If no one has stepped forward before that time to propose a way to fix the problems (such as via a PR), the ports will be deleted. portname: textproc/linux-aspell description: Spelling checker with better logic than ispell (linux version) maintainer: office@FreeBSD.org deprecated because: expiration date: 2013-02-28 build errors: none. overview: http://portsmon.FreeBSD.org/portoverview.py?category=textproc&portname=linux-aspell If this problem is one that you are already aware of, please accept our apologies and ignore this message. On the other hand, if you no longer wish to maintain this port (or ports), please reply with a message stating that, and accept our thanks for your efforts in the past. Thanks for your efforts to help improve FreeBSD. From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 12:36:44 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D7659C8 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:36:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.ysv.FreeBSD.org (portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:6601]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF2ABBD7 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:36:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from indexbuild (uid 5020) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) id 1ab91b by portsindexbuild.ysv.FreeBSD.org (DragonFly Mail Agent v0.7); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:36:43 +0000 To: office@FreeBSD.org, Subject: Ports with duplicate LATEST_LINKs Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:36:43 +0000 Message-Id: <512614db.1ab91b.6726f9da@portsindexbuild.ysv.FreeBSD.org> From: X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 12:36:44 -0000 Dear port maintainers, The following list includes ports maintained by you that have duplicate LATEST_LINK values. They should either be modified to use a unique LATEST_LINK or suppressed using NO_LATEST_LINK, to avoid overwriting each other in the packages/Latest directory. If your ports conflict with ports maintained by another person, please coordinate your efforts with them. Thanks, Erwin "Annoying Reminder Guy III" Lansing LATEST_LINK PORTNAME MAINTAINER ========================================================================== libmspub print/libmspub office@FreeBSD.org libmspub textproc/libmspub office@FreeBSD.org Total: 2 ports From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 18:20:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C11DBDE for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:20:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EE37E7F for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:20:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r1LIK2sW000256 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:20:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r1LIK2v6000255; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:20:02 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:20:02 GMT Message-Id: <201302211820.r1LIK2v6000255@freefall.freebsd.org> To: office@FreeBSD.org From: "Mikhail T." Subject: Re: ports/176269: editors/libreoffice 3.6.5_2 does not start on i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Mikhail T." List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:20:02 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/176269; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Mikhail T." To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, rotkap@gmx.de Cc: Subject: Re: ports/176269: editors/libreoffice 3.6.5_2 does not start on i386 Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:12:51 -0500 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050904030307000605070102 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit What about the contents of /var/db/ports/libreoffice/options? Also, judging by the stack, the crash is in initializing the GUI. Is there anything "unusual" about your X11 desktop? Low color-depth, for example? Some (common) fonts missing? Thanks, -mi --------------050904030307000605070102 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit What about the contents of /var/db/ports/libreoffice/options?

Also, judging by the stack, the crash is in initializing the GUI. Is there anything "unusual" about your X11 desktop? Low color-depth, for example? Some (common) fonts missing? Thanks,
-mi
--------------050904030307000605070102-- From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Feb 21 18:50:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 869DE8B5 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:50:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 796DE115 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:50:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r1LIo17Y005029 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:50:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r1LIo16j005025; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:50:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:50:01 GMT Message-Id: <201302211850.r1LIo16j005025@freefall.freebsd.org> To: office@FreeBSD.org From: Heino Tiedemann Subject: Re: ports/176269: editors/libreoffice 3.6.5_2 does not start on i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Heino Tiedemann List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 18:50:01 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/176269; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Heino Tiedemann To: "Mikhail T." Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/176269: editors/libreoffice 3.6.5_2 does not start on i386 Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:43:53 +0100 "Mikhail T." wrote: > What about the contents of /var/db/ports/libreoffice/options? % cat /var/db/ports/libreoffice/options # This file is auto-generated by 'make config'. # Options for libreoffice-3.6.5_2 _OPTIONS_READ=libreoffice-3.6.5_2 _FILE_COMPLETE_OPTIONS_LIST=CPPUNIT CUPS DEBUG GNOME GTK2 GTK3 JAVA KDE4 MERGELIBS MMEDIA PGSQL SDK SVG SYSTRAY WEBDAV OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=CPPUNIT OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=CUPS OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=DEBUG OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=GNOME OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=GTK2 OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=GTK3 OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=JAVA OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=KDE4 OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=MERGELIBS OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=MMEDIA OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=PGSQL OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=SDK OPTIONS_FILE_SET+=SVG OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=SYSTRAY OPTIONS_FILE_UNSET+=WEBDAV > Also, judging by the stack, the crash is in initializing the GUI. Srange! What is the difference between libreoffice-3.6.5_2 vs libreoffice-3.6.5_1 ? > Is > there anything "unusual" about your X11 desktop? No libreoffice 3.6.5_2 just crashes itself on start. Not more > Low color-depth, for example? Some (common) fonts missing? Thanks, No. And libreoffice 3.6.5_1 works is fine. :-| Heino From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 22 03:14:53 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3981776; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 03:14:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jnagyjr1978@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qe0-f47.google.com (mail-qe0-f47.google.com [209.85.128.47]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56041124; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 03:14:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qe0-f47.google.com with SMTP id 2so124304qea.34 for ; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:14:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UTP8A41oOGxXJzA3MTGHcLI5tvs/5auTbzWMy+wamy0=; b=acWzU4L/uYgczrnKCQpmXX2AE+7y2mnjrYJCdfbjVuR+vx/LQaN2PesSGtauD8QbGy Rva2inje22uFXrBdQotfw25+mxBcnamQcU58kv2Tnb029EQQ2uEyXMEBTW2YtKzI6hj3 9aEViMvr26B7W0bNpwUMGYnHstJsGfYFDGcaINk8ipxdWAG4zAXxmDwbD6qBjo9LEo76 ICggydQdG4+c3717e+MJdBq9Ll4KqPvTwgFoxNMIY9I/6Xte5xrAZ7+ZTAfmhLjOUVYx E6HzjQdPL7vFFO7PBfqyaqB6TA8urDgQsncedhQXFV5DAM6ef9D8rfaFZi2Q/aBGYCYw j6oQ== X-Received: by 10.49.128.37 with SMTP id nl5mr149877qeb.59.1361502887043; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:14:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (vid-196.dhcp.grp10.tnmmrl.infoave.net. [204.116.254.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hn9sm1484962qab.8.2013.02.21.19.14.43 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:14:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5126E29F.2050804@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 21:14:39 -0600 From: "Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130220 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Ports @ FreeBSD" , office@freebsd.org Subject: Issues Compiling editors/openoffice-3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 03:14:53 -0000 I've been having issues compiling editors/openoffice-3 for several weeks and I'm not sure where the problem is cropping up. # less /etc/make.conf WITH_PKGNG=yes # added by use.perl 2012-12-11 17:43:33 PERL_VERSION=5.16.2 #Add in clang after rebuilding world WITH_CLANG=YES CXX=clang++ CPP=clang-cpp CC=clang #kernel building KERNCONF=ALEX-LAPTOP #ruby support RUBY_VER=1.9 RUBY_VERSION=1.9 RUBY_DEFAULT_VERSION=1.9 #python support PYTHON_DEFAULT_VERSION=python2.7 #random stuff WITH_CUPS=YES CUPS_OVERWRITE_BASE=YES WITHOUT_LPR=YES WITH_BERKELEYDB=db48 WITH_BDB_VER=48 The error message and some of the scrollback: touch ../../unxfbsdx.pro/misc/build/so_installed_commons-lang cp -f ../../unxfbsdx.pro/misc/build/commons-lang-2.3-src/dist/commons-lang-2.3.jar ../../unxfbsdx.pro/class touch ../../unxfbsdx.pro/misc/build/so_predeliver_commons-lang apache-commons deliver deliver -- version: 275594 COPY: build.lst -> /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-3/work/aoo-3.4.1/main/solver/341/unxfbsdx.pro/inc/apache-commons/build.lst COPY: ../unxfbsdx.pro/class/commons-logging-1.1.1-SNAPSHOT.jar -> /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-3/work/aoo-3.4.1/main/solver/341/unxfbsdx.pro/bin/commons-logging-1.1.1.jar COPY: ../unxfbsdx.pro/class/commons-codec-1.3.jar -> /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-3/work/aoo-3.4.1/main/solver/341/unxfbsdx.pro/bin/commons-codec-1.3.jar COPY: ../unxfbsdx.pro/class/commons-httpclient.jar -> /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-3/work/aoo-3.4.1/main/solver/341/unxfbsdx.pro/bin/commons-httpclient-3.1.jar COPY: ../unxfbsdx.pro/class/commons-lang-2.3.jar -> /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-3/work/aoo-3.4.1/main/solver/341/unxfbsdx.pro/bin/commons-lang-2.3.jar LOG: writing /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-3/work/aoo-3.4.1/main/solver/341/unxfbsdx.pro/inc/apache-commons/deliver.log Module 'apache-commons' delivered successfully. 5 files copied, 0 files unchanged 2 module(s): stlport soltools need(s) to be rebuilt Reason(s): ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-3/work/aoo-3.4.1/main/stlport ERROR: error 65280 occurred while making /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-3/work/aoo-3.4.1/main/soltools/giparser When you have fixed the errors in that module you can resume the build by running: build --from stlport soltools *** [do-build] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-3. *** [build] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/editors/openoffice-3. ===>>> make failed for editors/openoffice-3 ===>>> Aborting update Terminated ===>>> Installation of graphics/vigra (vigra-1.9.0_1) complete ===>>> You can restart from the point of failure with this command line: portmaster editors/openoffice-3 I can run script(1) and retry the compile and upload that to a pastebin if need be. -- Yours in Christ, Joseph A Nagy Jr "Whoever loves instruction loves knowledge, But he who hates correction is stupid." -- Proverbs 12:1 Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. Original content CopyFree (F) under the OWL http://copyfree.org/licenses/owl/license.txt From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 22 13:16:42 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 968A47FC; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 13:16:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jnagyjr1978@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qa0-f54.google.com (mail-qa0-f54.google.com [209.85.216.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 345FEE6F; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 13:16:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id hg5so363182qab.6 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 05:16:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NKflj7ViVkq5nSlIZja1S/aRoT2iVeEHCzJ7Fn6Jqps=; b=lP2eelp1NGsmINzl5c28e2visnO37PHME/64q2DHF/Y1NwC53Y2LiG271jJEIB7pIg InWWCXBkKwXXec+7xahZqZxTHPgyfjX54rT6LfKbksoHS8gpz78TWvWSy5PzgflOlsUz a+Qsg/CU95JDV68SSIO9S9qxyD7a0tdMKJFd3A1UdkVZKkCIxzRxrifROfpsc6RewLjQ pj3gtW1cqbXH/x2ZB0Yiu8/kB8zJteMYoUyJgwbI8KteP/i5HT7YqSHB95a4k7ibbByr JBjJz9Hd0vjuYaNDDUWD8Ee4Hyaa8qxOs18iYfrORL/oxC4eLdgTbd5noFLLL5SGLqry tTPQ== X-Received: by 10.229.136.66 with SMTP id q2mr163070qct.151.1361539001440; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 05:16:41 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.33] (vid-196.dhcp.grp10.tnmmrl.infoave.net. [204.116.254.196]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id hr1sm1564796qeb.3.2013.02.22.05.16.39 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 22 Feb 2013 05:16:40 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <51276FB5.9040707@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 07:16:37 -0600 From: "Joseph A. Nagy, Jr" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130221 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pedro Giffuni , "Ports @ FreeBSD" , office@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Issues Compiling editors/openoffice-3 References: <176560FF-7722-4F09-9F9B-5D9EE5A58A2F@yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <176560FF-7722-4F09-9F9B-5D9EE5A58A2F@yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 13:16:42 -0000 On 02/21/13 22:42, Pedro Giffuni wrote: > Hello; > > OpenOffice, and particularly the internal stlport it uses doesnt compile with clang. > > Cheers, > > Pedro. > > Inviato da iPad > Well stink. No problem, I'll comment out those sections in my make.conf and go from there. Thanks! -- Yours in Christ, Joseph A Nagy Jr "Whoever loves instruction loves knowledge, But he who hates correction is stupid." -- Proverbs 12:1 Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. Original content CopyFree (F) under the OWL http://copyfree.org/licenses/owl/license.txt From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 22 15:20:15 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9204BE9; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:20:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from edwin@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95672785; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:20:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r1MFKFR1039206; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:20:15 GMT (envelope-from edwin@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from edwin@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r1MFKF5w039202; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:20:15 GMT (envelope-from edwin) Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:20:15 GMT Message-Id: <201302221520.r1MFKF5w039202@freefall.freebsd.org> To: edwin@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org, office@FreeBSD.org From: edwin@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/176349: [ports] regression: devel/boost-libs 1.52.0_1 does not build on ia64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 15:20:15 -0000 Synopsis: [ports] regression: devel/boost-libs 1.52.0_1 does not build on ia64 Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->office Responsible-Changed-By: edwin Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Feb 22 15:20:15 UTC 2013 Responsible-Changed-Why: Over to maintainer (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool) http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=176349 From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 23 05:07:38 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B83C41AE; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 05:07:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter@rulingia.com) Received: from vps.rulingia.com (host-122-100-2-194.octopus.com.au [122.100.2.194]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E2C4CD1; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 05:07:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.rulingia.com (c220-239-237-213.belrs5.nsw.optusnet.com.au [220.239.237.213]) by vps.rulingia.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1N575b6091288 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:07:06 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from peter@rulingia.com) X-Bogosity: Ham, spamicity=0.000000 Received: from server.rulingia.com (localhost.rulingia.com [127.0.0.1]) by server.rulingia.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r1N56x9e099825 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:07:00 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from peter@server.rulingia.com) Received: (from peter@localhost) by server.rulingia.com (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id r1N56wZs099823; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:06:58 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from peter) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:06:58 +1100 From: Peter Jeremy To: "Mikhail T." Subject: Re: ports/176269: editors/libreoffice 3.6.5_2 does not start on i386 Message-ID: <20130223050658.GA99145@server.rulingia.com> References: <201302192350.r1JNo273094356@freefall.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201302192350.r1JNo273094356@freefall.freebsd.org> X-PGP-Key: http://www.rulingia.com/keys/peter.pgp User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: office@freebsd.org, bug-followup@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 05:07:38 -0000 --2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am seeing what appears to be the same problem on FreeBSD aspire.rulingia.com 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #19: Sun Jan 13 1= 7:55:03 EST 2013 root@builder.rulingia.com:/obj/usr/src/sys/aspire i386 with LO compiled using clang-3.2. The problem doesn't occur using identical port versions on the same FreeBSD version running amd64. My (edited) backtrace is: This GDB was configured as "i386-marcel-freebsd"...(no debugging symbols fo= und)... Core was generated by `soffice.bin'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libmergedlo.so...(n= o debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libmergedlo.so =2E.. Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libpcre.so.3...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libpcre.so.3 Reading symbols from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1...done. Loaded symbols for /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 #0 0x2ddcf0d0 in ?? () from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libvclplug_= genlo.so [New Thread 2d239140 (LWP 101110/soffice.bin)] [New Thread 2d202140 (LWP 100530/initial thread)] (gdb) where #0 0x2ddcf0d0 in ?? () from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libvclplug_= genlo.so Invalid binary operation on numbers. (gdb) info regi eax 0x2d739300 762548992 ecx 0x0 0 edx 0x2d739300 762548992 ebx 0x0 0 esp 0xffffd028 0xffffd028 ebp 0xffffd1d8 0xffffd1d8 esi 0x2d739328 762549032 edi 0xffffd3d0 -11312 eip 0x2ddcf0d0 0x2ddcf0d0 eflags 0x10292 66194 cs 0x33 51 ss 0x3b 59 ds 0x3b 59 es 0x3b 59 fs 0x13 19 gs 0x1b 27 (gdb) x/2i 0x2ddcf0d0 0x2ddcf0d0 <_init+5772>: jmp *0x5a4(%ebx) 0x2ddcf0d6 <_init+5778>: push $0xb30 (gdb)=20 [I've never seen that error before but it doesn't look promising] So, it's a NULL pointer dereference - but I can't say much more. --=20 Peter Jeremy --2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlEoTnIACgkQ/opHv/APuIdGPQCeLNih9swzxXHj7QBCQUjP0WVA OqcAn31bitBB06AfhnKH9uUfsnDmnNcI =hcNx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO-- From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 23 05:10:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@smarthost.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2CB22A1 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 05:10:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 890FECE4 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 05:10:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id r1N5A16r000855 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 05:10:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.6/8.14.6/Submit) id r1N5A1eT000854; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 05:10:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 05:10:01 GMT Message-Id: <201302230510.r1N5A1eT000854@freefall.freebsd.org> To: office@FreeBSD.org From: Peter Jeremy Subject: Re: ports/176269: editors/libreoffice 3.6.5_2 does not start on i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Peter Jeremy List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 05:10:02 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/176269; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Peter Jeremy To: "Mikhail T." Cc: office@freebsd.org, bug-followup@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/176269: editors/libreoffice 3.6.5_2 does not start on i386 Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:06:58 +1100 --2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I am seeing what appears to be the same problem on FreeBSD aspire.rulingia.com 8.3-STABLE FreeBSD 8.3-STABLE #19: Sun Jan 13 1= 7:55:03 EST 2013 root@builder.rulingia.com:/obj/usr/src/sys/aspire i386 with LO compiled using clang-3.2. The problem doesn't occur using identical port versions on the same FreeBSD version running amd64. My (edited) backtrace is: This GDB was configured as "i386-marcel-freebsd"...(no debugging symbols fo= und)... Core was generated by `soffice.bin'. Program terminated with signal 11, Segmentation fault. Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libmergedlo.so...(n= o debugging symbols found)...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libmergedlo.so =2E.. Reading symbols from /usr/local/lib/libpcre.so.3...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/lib/libpcre.so.3 Reading symbols from /libexec/ld-elf.so.1...done. Loaded symbols for /libexec/ld-elf.so.1 #0 0x2ddcf0d0 in ?? () from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libvclplug_= genlo.so [New Thread 2d239140 (LWP 101110/soffice.bin)] [New Thread 2d202140 (LWP 100530/initial thread)] (gdb) where #0 0x2ddcf0d0 in ?? () from /usr/local/lib/libreoffice/program/libvclplug_= genlo.so Invalid binary operation on numbers. (gdb) info regi eax 0x2d739300 762548992 ecx 0x0 0 edx 0x2d739300 762548992 ebx 0x0 0 esp 0xffffd028 0xffffd028 ebp 0xffffd1d8 0xffffd1d8 esi 0x2d739328 762549032 edi 0xffffd3d0 -11312 eip 0x2ddcf0d0 0x2ddcf0d0 eflags 0x10292 66194 cs 0x33 51 ss 0x3b 59 ds 0x3b 59 es 0x3b 59 fs 0x13 19 gs 0x1b 27 (gdb) x/2i 0x2ddcf0d0 0x2ddcf0d0 <_init+5772>: jmp *0x5a4(%ebx) 0x2ddcf0d6 <_init+5778>: push $0xb30 (gdb)=20 [I've never seen that error before but it doesn't look promising] So, it's a NULL pointer dereference - but I can't say much more. --=20 Peter Jeremy --2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlEoTnIACgkQ/opHv/APuIdGPQCeLNih9swzxXHj7QBCQUjP0WVA OqcAn31bitBB06AfhnKH9uUfsnDmnNcI =hcNx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --2oS5YaxWCcQjTEyO-- From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 23 15:57:21 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1944F840 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 15:57:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter_beckers@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.30]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DF2B2A1 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 15:57:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from roundcube.xs4all.nl (roundcube6.xs4all.net [194.109.20.204]) by smtp-vbr10.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r1NFvDlO087728 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:57:13 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from peter_beckers@xs4all.nl) Received: from a82-95-90-249.adsl.xs4all.nl ([82.95.90.249]) by roundcube.xs4all.nl with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:57:13 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:57:13 +0100 From: peter beckers To: Subject: missing sampleicc-1.6.6 Message-ID: <10f9d9660b95538d38f0661532f21a4f@xs4all.nl> X-Sender: peter_beckers@xs4all.nl (woCyz4BxIVoWePjrvNh3YrElUpugMi5A) User-Agent: XS4ALL Webmail X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 15:57:21 -0000 To whom it may concern, Installing the package libreoffice-3.5.6_1.tbz, does not succeed. All dependencies are solved, except for this one: "pkg_add: could not find package sampleicc-1.6.6 !" Searching with "FreeBSD Ports Search" tells me that this package should be in graphics or in devel. I looked on ftp.freebsd.org, ftp.dk.freebsd.org, ftp5.freebsd.org, ftp7.freebsd.org but could not find this package anywhere. Can you please let me know on which server this packages resides? Thanks at forehand. Regards, Peter Beckers -- Met vriendelijke groet, Peter Beckers From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 23 22:50:55 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-office@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00412F8D for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 22:50:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kevinz5000@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-f174.google.com (mail-ob0-f174.google.com [209.85.214.174]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B6D8EC for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 22:50:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f174.google.com with SMTP id 16so1681727obc.33 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 14:50:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :x-enigmail-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=JF9lKTJ80q/KUtM1XJruDw4z6wvLeR3qsYJSGX+9eGk=; b=k9r8POHXQvIeyoxrUEK+nrY/5GVVX2RwMTla+g6tOMK4Q+h/fA5zaURL5qgIN/Wccx 56o/tjZhxpHrPuqm90egPF8zfTyf5sKyOvO9Z1P57jjX44lOwIbRdOdVtN3KyHGu051Z UzGUwnSL5y9JvdOabDuhcqGVwHN1C56kmHKLklegrSjq9DV8L2mvhHsPQzNrhnZ99k9B KW07gXXRaKm1l2kheXto68XnHTVhZ4T3RIajSmw2X+hzWFvv7BZR0fX0c4MYSoJKKskv t+Q4K/P6FnCIfmY0F2eh4Qqqu8eIpnEeaZ1LlUnpqPhct4TMy7970VtrEhDwvDvxJS7U yNBA== X-Received: by 10.60.13.162 with SMTP id i2mr3211516oec.121.1361659848425; Sat, 23 Feb 2013 14:50:48 -0800 (PST) Received: from sigma.local (adsl-99-126-100-65.dsl.stl2mo.sbcglobal.net. [99.126.100.65]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y4sm3675528oea.7.2013.02.23.14.50.47 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 23 Feb 2013 14:50:47 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <512947C6.90301@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 16:50:46 -0600 From: Kevin Zheng User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130221 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-office@freebsd.org Subject: Add English dictionary as a run-depends for editors/libreoffice X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2013 22:50:55 -0000 Greetings, After struggling to get spell check working on LibreOffice, I gave up for a long time. Only today did I realize that I needed an additional dependency, textproc/en-hunspell, to install the English dictionary. I would like to suggest that the English dictionary files (from "en-hunspell") be added to the run-depends of editors/libreoffice. I believe this will help many users (including myself) to get a working productivity suite out of the box. I'm not particularly informed about the details, such as whether this will impact the translated slave ports or not. I'm also hoping this won't take too much bikeshed painting to sort out. Thanks, Kevin Zheng