From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 18 00:43:07 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2EB48A6 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 00:43:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pb0-x22b.google.com (mail-pb0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9D5524C2 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 00:43:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f43.google.com with SMTP id md4so3447465pbc.30 for ; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 17:43:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=W92O5HNnQN13OCZp9HhCbiv4pSDCrOajbdUzFfNchSc=; b=q7Wl/AZG3ndQst5KJermJmdB/ay15EVHmLyoj+gN3hGbazLJy8I/6YjfdOoSvEHqVQ ns2BSIAnGqZlubU+9gKRrGymQFKyC1tBhGY/lLuk+QONaNybDG0g4/K6HXXHyvbst7Z7 Awi+sgk6kpKwqVUJ718hH+a6LCTjJGqBr+yfUOZbw7Vhu4FVyYJiAS+It8l5zaAStCrS estcqIUVIImsps+Sgi1UJsg9tuSoMb66tokenl6ZRiSHJ3qkl+GehTpmx59V9O7VZxbc zMIiN5CYXvmL9RPM1m5fqyMR0hZSyPrTMHGHFkTkv5uAuh12VlT6cUyLWAKsPNytg/86 YStg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.144.161 with SMTP id sn1mr5399163pab.30.1376786587133; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 17:43:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.92.79 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 17:43:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1FF39756-0555-4CD8-95B7-862F9644CF78@elde.net> References: <520E5EC0.5090105@fjl.co.uk> <9FB6809B-DD5D-4A04-8BD9-0271FAC03181@elde.net> <520F53A2.80707@fjl.co.uk> <520F8AA8.8030407@fjl.co.uk> <1FF39756-0555-4CD8-95B7-862F9644CF78@elde.net> Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 19:43:07 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: VPN where local private address collide From: Adam Vande More To: Terje Elde Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , Frank Leonhardt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 00:43:07 -0000 On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 6:29 PM, Terje Elde wrote: > On 17. aug. 2013, at 16:37, Frank Leonhardt wrote: > > This is just the sort of problem Google will have when it buys Facebook > :-) > > Probably not. If Google were to buy Facebook, I'm confident they'd be able > to renumber their networks if they have to. > > > Your explanation of the foul-up possible with NAPT is well made, > although not really talking about the kind of NAT used on Home/SME routers > (one public address hiding many private one) - I'm thinking of Basic NAT - > one-to-one replacement, not one-to-many. (i.e. static address assignment). > All the router (or firewall) needs to do is swap the IP address in the > header as it passes through, and swap it back when it returns. The two > hosts shouldn't notice a thing. > > That's a good theory. In reality, it's much more complicated. > > What about SSL/TLS for example? How would the router swap the header in > an encrypted session? Same as it would any sessions since only the payload is encrypted. What Frank calls basic nat, most people call static nat(at least people who have read enough Cisco docs) and it works just fine. Also you are confusing headers. IP itself has a header and TCP and UDP each have their own. SIP/TLS works just fine on static nat. IPsec is different as it encrypts the port info but there is almost always something can be done about this at that level. > Swapping headers is also a bit outside the scope of NAT No, it's the entire point of NAT. How do you think the "Translation" occurs? Again you are confusing header levels. In general, NAT doesn't care about whatever info is in the payload, only layer 3 and usually layer 4 and in certain configs layer 5 are pertinent to NAT configs. -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 18 01:15:52 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C0FDCE0 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 01:15:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from mail-ee0-f44.google.com (mail-ee0-f44.google.com [74.125.83.44]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B125125F0 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 01:15:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f44.google.com with SMTP id b47so1540643eek.31 for ; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 18:15:44 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=yRmxf6vyqB3uGQrbDB1DbK48CUI9f8lapbWD130jMtU=; b=Mcaq5DvuHXCUMdfRRDawHNylyHPsacegZ0+qP834u8ImPTMzZhb/8DosmoS2EQF/O3 Gj+1BEua8Gr0OfAj6yhNT40PZwGtC2NHftiMJBc45eCQ3bT7VI+au+WUCGx/qgvV05hY yFYdRudzx9Xosy1oBw/MDSVx5HLdYgSjXwK5dnZfQaYDuASavEsrYNG7D66U1Q5GAFd+ 4DQan/xa2/86m+VzT7x57HPusT+q2gDMIA1zVSEG50jOBoYPy5T+l2VnxSp71S8nL1CD 12eM8yGDBI89vP4/jB8WfRe1zomf0XgT9o+vJeTOBYin8Kqle4UbYz6TJiqaWDzEldqo rA3w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm2M30+yTKiE7/RzOxFsTsXZgVSI0Vm5HW3nEp3AHeTvqkccUdt93p8Od+RMeIb/lLUlHsC X-Received: by 10.14.111.9 with SMTP id v9mr9889785eeg.35.1376788099500; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 18:08:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phenom.cordula.ws (p5DDDB3B5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.221.179.181]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id a4sm7042311eez.0.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 17 Aug 2013 18:08:18 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <52101E80.6060407@cordula.ws> Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 03:08:16 +0200 From: cpghost User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130711 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Walter Hurry Subject: Re: Mouse Trails? References: <20130817173126.e6f52195.freebsd@ edvax.de> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 01:15:52 -0000 On 08/17/13 18:14, Walter Hurry wrote: > On Sat, 17 Aug 2013 17:31:26 +0200, Polytropon wrote: > >> If LXDE uses an ugly white mouse cursor, try changing it to black (the >> normal color for mouse cursors on all serious GUI systems). The >> classical way of solving the "where is the mouse cursor" problem is to >> install xeyes. :-) > > I am reluctant to install Compiz, but xeyes looks to be just the ticket! Good ole Xeyes... ;-) But beware, xeyes crashes X server right now! Using xeyes-1.1.1 xorg-server-1.7.7_8,1 on FreeBSD 9.2-PRERELEASE #0 r253323 Sat Jul 13 21:00:32 CEST 2013 amd64 I'm not the only one who's got X server crashes with xeyes: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/2012-May/011833.html @Polytropon: what version of xeyes/xorg-server are you using? -cpghost. -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 18 03:14:04 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B6C5B60 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 03:14:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from iamatt@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x235.google.com (mail-wi0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D342E2B14 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 03:14:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id en1so1961564wid.8 for ; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 20:14:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=96MKmucrqvQEn6NzgcmZNwFlrEw2mHO6qSjTxAMQ/o0=; b=oHFI438IYTriNGYNmv80zQ2+15+2ziKs5QdgXdeQZjZosciwaYjCGYukR7Jhy3hgIf 7JaBrgz+Ayz/uGa319B2XRKmVsZJq45M8gneEzu6IVq0UE/yulDGHObBpqeI/28Mwkt8 yD2oB7OHvSGF1GbcktI9Nx2t+7PxrpHn3tGPoIq9cVkJ2iqTe5EIicTbN0L2SOPwWdou HPy5VxudXzV1H8bYQRgu0b9nRbTOp0m2yai63ISssAbhPrUXPgAisu5pyLBTuHvlVEbY r4s0K/KYNb+JMUtyV1/T+VhMTmCWkdjD+UnB7eVd3yd+12/GEP1iH2AyMF2FLvz9Be4F /7Rg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.37.164 with SMTP id z4mr3406371wij.30.1376795642197; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 20:14:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.217.50.196 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 20:14:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.217.50.196 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 20:14:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <297A8244-3756-4126-9F23-B772B81127C7@gmail.com> <52F83CC6-2D87-43E7-9F9C-9D16ED637064@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 22:14:02 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Myrinet 10Gb odd behavior - SOLVED From: iamatt To: aurfalien Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 03:14:04 -0000 Wow myricom still around... used to use the lanai stuff never on bsd though. All FDR Infiniband these days. Are you using the myrinet protocol or ethernet, just curious. Glad you got it working! On Aug 16, 2013 8:12 PM, "aurfalien" wrote: > > On Aug 16, 2013, at 8:47 AM, aurfalien wrote: > > > Forgot to mention my loader.conf; > > > > if_mxge_load="YES" > > mxge_ethp_z8e_load="YES" > > mxge_eth_z8e_load="YES" > > mxge_rss_ethp_z8e_load="YES" > > mxge_rss_eth_z8e_load="YES" > > > > > > I blindly added these w/o thinking what they do. > > > > Should I simply only load the first line? > > > > - aurf > > > > > > On Aug 16, 2013, at 8:18 AM, aurfalien wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I've been suspecting my NIC is not up to par and notice this in the > logs every few minutes; > >> > >> Aug 16 08:05:06 prometheus kernel: mxge0: slice 0 struck? ring state: > >> Aug 16 08:05:06 prometheus kernel: mxge0: tx.req=1914503981 > tx.done=1914503810, tx.queue_active=0 > >> Aug 16 08:05:06 prometheus kernel: mxge0: tx.activate=0 tx.deactivate=0 > >> Aug 16 08:05:06 prometheus kernel: mxge0: pkt_done=1824019832 > fw=1824019931 > >> Aug 16 08:05:06 prometheus kernel: mxge0: Watchdog reset! > >> Aug 16 08:05:06 prometheus kernel: mxge0: NIC did not reboot, not > resetting > >> > >> Could tis be effecting throughput? > >> > >> My card is a Myri-10G-PCIE-8A > >> > >> I did install the Myrinet dev tools for FreeBSD and ran myri_info which > yields; > >> > >> pci-dev at 05:00.0 vendor:product(rev)=14c1:0008(00) > >> behind bridge root-port: 00:03.0 8086:3c08 (x8.1/x16.3) > >> Myri-10G-PCIE-8A -- Link x8 > >> EEPROM String-spec: > >> MAC=00:60:dd:45:73:23 > >> SN=413665 > >> PWR=100 > >> PC=10G-PCIE-8A-R > >> PN=09-03852 > >> XFI=AEL1010 > >> TAG=ze_tools-1_4_45 > >> > >> EEPROM MCP, PRESENT, length = 103384, crc=0x119daf46 > >> ETHZ::1.4.45 2009/08/22 18:57:06 self extracting firmware > >> Bundle: exec_len=72144, PCI-ROM-len = 31232 > >> Running MCP: > >> ETH ::1.4.55 -P- 2012/04/21 01:48:34 myri10ge firmware > >> > >> Any insights are appreciated. > >> > >> - aurf > > > Did the ole RTFM and re programmed the firmware, all good now. > > - aurf > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 18 03:19:10 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 546DAD3A for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 03:19:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aurfalien@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-x230.google.com (mail-ob0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A8EB2B4D for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 03:19:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f176.google.com with SMTP id uz19so3465215obc.7 for ; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 20:19:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=S9osmcQUEKrTuASD8sXI2hkPSDj0KNyNfd7r37Tya6k=; b=mD+zTfg5jWsHY5hvVv2fgxh22+2y/NEbDk4O7SXg/xYr+l/N6b6j4RzzlkdbIOgkAx OrywgHk1baGenR+NE8w1Y5pybiX0OZJnj04/YPFMErS9q5M3SHTjAMOCi9Bdde0aPQep L4ySG0n/8sJC0qVdhYXqheEVBksaY2iQK97eLwTeDLQosqJ7tRdxJe11bzHEjb1yEfQ0 D8VnWj4TKazywBlmWaWsHuByscfyIuBPW7+90SOA7v1ROr+paIlr1fY64z8HKevahUP3 LedLOQ6Osz15xJUIKUCzW2ZV7pJphkivblnU6r38cNDYO9hLC7za46f868Wbp20GVVSq fC9Q== X-Received: by 10.60.84.147 with SMTP id z19mr9339990oey.21.1376795949092; Sat, 17 Aug 2013 20:19:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.74] (75-63-29-182.lightspeed.irvnca.sbcglobal.net. [75.63.29.182]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id a18sm5340860obf.7.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 17 Aug 2013 20:19:07 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Myrinet 10Gb odd behavior - SOLVED Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) From: aurfalien In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 17 Aug 2013 20:19:04 -0700 Message-Id: References: <297A8244-3756-4126-9F23-B772B81127C7@gmail.com> <52F83CC6-2D87-43E7-9F9C-9D16ED637064@gmail.com> To: iamatt X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 03:19:10 -0000 Spoke to soon. Fine for a while (doing a 5 day rsync of 38TB) but = getting those errors every 7 min. And I'm only getting 1.24Gb/s over a = 10Gb jumbo link. Definitely causing connection issues. Using it for ethernet. Gonna go in tomorrow and give my Solarflare another shot as it was = giving me issues but the rel notes say to try this, so I will; - The driver uses mbufs to store packet data which come from a set of = pools of limted size. See man 7 tuning for more details. The following = command can display the number of used and free mbufs within the pools the = Solarflare driver uses # vmstat -z | head -n 1; vmstat -z | grep mbuf ITEM SIZE LIMIT USED FREE REQUESTS = FAILURES mbuf_cluster: 2048, 25600, 1408, 658, 31604, = 0 mbuf_jumbo_page: 4096, 12800, 0, 76, 2063, = 0 mbuf_jumbo_9k: 9216, 6400, 0, 0, 0, = 0 mbuf_jumbo_16k: 16384, 3200, 0, 0, 0, = 0 If a pool is exhausted (i.e. the failure count in the right hand = column is non-zero, networking applications may hang or received packets may be = dropped. Hence you may need to increase these limits using the following = sysctls: kern.ipc.nmbclusters (for mbuf_cluster) kern.ipc.nmbjumbop (for mbuf_jumbo_page) kern.ipc.nmbjumbo9 (for mbuf_jumbo_9k) kern.ipc.nmbjumbo16 (for mbuf_jumbo_16k) - aurf On Aug 17, 2013, at 8:14 PM, iamatt wrote: > Wow myricom still around... used to use the lanai stuff never on bsd = though. All FDR Infiniband these days. Are you using the myrinet = protocol or ethernet, just curious. Glad you got it working! >=20 > On Aug 16, 2013 8:12 PM, "aurfalien" wrote: >=20 > On Aug 16, 2013, at 8:47 AM, aurfalien wrote: >=20 > > Forgot to mention my loader.conf; > > > > if_mxge_load=3D"YES" > > mxge_ethp_z8e_load=3D"YES" > > mxge_eth_z8e_load=3D"YES" > > mxge_rss_ethp_z8e_load=3D"YES" > > mxge_rss_eth_z8e_load=3D"YES" > > > > > > I blindly added these w/o thinking what they do. > > > > Should I simply only load the first line? > > > > - aurf > > > > > > On Aug 16, 2013, at 8:18 AM, aurfalien wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I've been suspecting my NIC is not up to par and notice this in the = logs every few minutes; > >> > >> Aug 16 08:05:06 prometheus kernel: mxge0: slice 0 struck? ring = state: > >> Aug 16 08:05:06 prometheus kernel: mxge0: tx.req=3D1914503981 = tx.done=3D1914503810, tx.queue_active=3D0 > >> Aug 16 08:05:06 prometheus kernel: mxge0: tx.activate=3D0 = tx.deactivate=3D0 > >> Aug 16 08:05:06 prometheus kernel: mxge0: pkt_done=3D1824019832 = fw=3D1824019931 > >> Aug 16 08:05:06 prometheus kernel: mxge0: Watchdog reset! > >> Aug 16 08:05:06 prometheus kernel: mxge0: NIC did not reboot, not = resetting > >> > >> Could tis be effecting throughput? > >> > >> My card is a Myri-10G-PCIE-8A > >> > >> I did install the Myrinet dev tools for FreeBSD and ran myri_info = which yields; > >> > >> pci-dev at 05:00.0 vendor:product(rev)=3D14c1:0008(00) > >> behind bridge root-port: 00:03.0 8086:3c08 (x8.1/x16.3) > >> Myri-10G-PCIE-8A -- Link x8 > >> EEPROM String-spec: > >> MAC=3D00:60:dd:45:73:23 > >> SN=3D413665 > >> PWR=3D100 > >> PC=3D10G-PCIE-8A-R > >> PN=3D09-03852 > >> XFI=3DAEL1010 > >> TAG=3Dze_tools-1_4_45 > >> > >> EEPROM MCP, PRESENT, length =3D 103384, crc=3D0x119daf46 > >> ETHZ::1.4.45 2009/08/22 18:57:06 self extracting firmware > >> Bundle: exec_len=3D72144, PCI-ROM-len =3D 31232 > >> Running MCP: > >> ETH ::1.4.55 -P- 2012/04/21 01:48:34 myri10ge firmware > >> > >> Any insights are appreciated. > >> > >> - aurf >=20 >=20 > Did the ole RTFM and re programmed the firmware, all good now. >=20 > - aurf > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 18 03:35:43 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0CD0EB3 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 03:35:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A58132BF1 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 03:35:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-92-43.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.92.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D4A92770B; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 05:28:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r7I3S1Bj007480; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 05:28:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 05:28:01 +0200 From: Polytropon To: cpghost Subject: Re: Mouse Trails? Message-Id: <20130818052801.faf0e0f7.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <52101E80.6060407@cordula.ws> References: <20130817173126.e6f52195.freebsd@ edvax.de> <52101E80.6060407@cordula.ws> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Walter Hurry X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 03:35:43 -0000 On Sun, 18 Aug 2013 03:08:16 +0200, cpghost wrote: > On 08/17/13 18:14, Walter Hurry wrote: > > On Sat, 17 Aug 2013 17:31:26 +0200, Polytropon wrote: > > > >> If LXDE uses an ugly white mouse cursor, try changing it to black (the > >> normal color for mouse cursors on all serious GUI systems). The > >> classical way of solving the "where is the mouse cursor" problem is to > >> install xeyes. :-) > > > > I am reluctant to install Compiz, but xeyes looks to be just the ticket! > > Good ole Xeyes... ;-) Old but still useful in specific cases. > But beware, xeyes crashes X server right now! Using > > xeyes-1.1.1 > xorg-server-1.7.7_8,1 > > on > FreeBSD 9.2-PRERELEASE #0 r253323 Sat Jul 13 21:00:32 CEST 2013 amd64 WHAT?! Unbelievable... that such a simple program could crash the whole X server... Does this happen in similar programs (speyes, wmeyes, xeyes+) too? > @Polytropon: what version of xeyes/xorg-server are you using? Currently none. My system is too old, I currently can't install any new software without reinstalling the whole system. Still on 8.2 at home, because I never touch a running system. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 18 09:06:48 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A5F26C for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 09:06:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gct7photography@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ea0-x22e.google.com (mail-ea0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c01::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 925EF26C5 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 09:06:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ea0-f174.google.com with SMTP id z15so1736093ead.19 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 02:06:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DqVYN+OKNLGi+9t+T0KR+xgwt5JzkSOcLZFdiU94Odo=; b=TySBQSOS5L0xEPJ3yRA9N3RTQpjtVWQqWfRsaB/KXjgvbvd8faVYQDGDsgRI8nxQtO KNGak3QkWnEqQCBRpuP0trr0XP6/1LWo9LhTjEsze8x6af/xcQFGsZ+Nel0lLQ3N9gpN w/wbd8m9zJrBLOxN6Cw4HRQx7dBFSkejuC/GPlJWfuZJA39j1shSPUHbAIgXmzPVCzYk pfH9Bh6XvZ+JzhHaIkoMB2siqsNMLOIbrDaKZNOcAWslqyPW2emvgOuAyt8Y2iwBjFpq ta/jWTXhlA8rHxE8L1qSrWirWTZuKxdOi1OpCGQMk8Ab1lPC3FEv2EnDiHnk4hH/03ln E6Lg== X-Received: by 10.14.219.198 with SMTP id m46mr12575460eep.41.1376816805806; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 02:06:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gnewsense.gmail.com (cpc20-maid5-2-0-cust191.basl.cable.virginmedia.com. [77.96.210.192]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id a1sm9153728eem.1.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 18 Aug 2013 02:06:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 10:06:27 +0100 From: Graham Todd To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: where to start with PGP/GPG? Message-ID: <20130818100627.1e27a6f3@gnewsense.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <201308151216.r7FCG93K082285@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> References: <201308151216.r7FCG93K082285@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.7.6 (GTK+ 2.20.1; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 09:06:48 -0000 LS0tLS1CRUdJTiBQR1AgU0lHTkVEIE1FU1NBR0UtLS0tLQ0KSGFzaDogU0hBMQ0KDQo+PkkgbmV2 ZXIgbmVlZGVkIHRvIHVzZSBwZ3AgdGlsbCBub3cuDQo+PlNvIEknbSBub3Qgc3VyZSB3aGVyZSB0 byBzdGFydC4NCj4+SXMgc2VjdXJpdHkvZ251cGcgdGhlIHdheSB0byBnbz8NCj4+QW55IG90aGVy IGFkdmljZT8NCj4+DQo+PlRoYW5rcw0KPj5BbnRvbg0KDQpZb3UgbWlnaHQgbGlrZSB0byBsb29r IGF0Og0KDQpodHRwOi8vd3d3LmN5YmVyZGVsaXgubmV0L3RlY2gvYnNkLWdwZy5odG0NCg0KYXMg YSBzdGFydC4gIEl0cyBnb3QgYSBsaXN0IG9mICJyZWxhdGVkIGFydGNsZXMiIHdpdGggdGhlIHBh Z2UgdGhhdA0KbWlnaHQgZ2l2ZSB5b3Ugc29tZSBvdGhlciBkaXJlY3Rpb25zIGluIHdoaWNoIHRv IGxvb2suDQoNClRoZSBnbnVwZy11c2VycyBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QgTUlHSFQgYmUgYWJsZSB0byBn aXZlIHlvdSBtb3JlDQpGcmVlQlNELXNwZWNpZmljIGhlbHAsIGJ1dCBJIG11c3QgY29uZmVzcyBJ IGhhdmUgbm90IHNlZW4gYW55IEZyZWVCU0QNCnNwZWNpZmljIGFuc3dlcnMgb3IgcXVlc3Rpb25z IGZvciBhIGxvbmcgdGltZS4gQW55d2F5LCBoZXJlIGlzIHRoZSBVUkwNCmZvciB0aGUgbWFpbGlu ZyBsaXN0KHMpOg0KDQpodHRwOi8vd3d3LmdudXBnLm9yZy9kb2N1bWVudGF0aW9uL21haWxpbmct bGlzdHMuZW4uaHRtbA0KDQoNCisrIEdyYWhhbSBUb2RkDQpVc2luZyBnTmV3U2Vuc2UgTGludXgg My4wICJQYXJrZXMiDQoNCi0tLS0tQkVHSU4gUEdQIFNJR05BVFVSRS0tLS0tDQpWZXJzaW9uOiBH bnVQRyB2MS40LjEwIChHTlUvTGludXgpDQoNCmlFWUVBUkVDQUFZRkFsSVFqcFFBQ2drUWtsRndW V3I0WXUrS0RRQ2dtZGI1R040SHVmb2lybXhPSVNiS2F5QWwNCkZ3MEFvT1gycWVNZnQzb2dFaU0z OGhvMkZqa3p1cm5qDQo9VkUwRA0KLS0tLS1FTkQgUEdQIFNJR05BVFVSRS0tLS0tDQo= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 18 10:20:42 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4CD7F95 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 10:20:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-doc@fjl.co.uk) Received: from bs1.fjl.org.uk (bs1.fjl.org.uk [84.45.41.196]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8487129C7 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 10:20:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.35] (mux.fjl.org.uk [62.3.120.246]) (authenticated bits=0) by bs1.fjl.org.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r7IAKaSp019417 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 18 Aug 2013 11:20:37 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from freebsd-doc@fjl.co.uk) Message-ID: <52109FF8.7010301@fjl.co.uk> Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 11:20:40 +0100 From: Frank Leonhardt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Terje Elde Subject: Re: VPN where local private address collide References: <520E5EC0.5090105@fjl.co.uk> <9FB6809B-DD5D-4A04-8BD9-0271FAC03181@elde.net> <520F53A2.80707@fjl.co.uk> <520F8AA8.8030407@fjl.co.uk> <1FF39756-0555-4CD8-95B7-862F9644CF78@elde.net> In-Reply-To: <1FF39756-0555-4CD8-95B7-862F9644CF78@elde.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 10:20:43 -0000 On 18/08/2013 00:29, Terje Elde wrote: > > The obvious answer is IPv6, of course. I'm surprised no one has > mentioned it yet. > > You seemed dead set on not renumbering the networks, and moving to > IPv6 would not only be just that, but also be harder than just > renumbering IPv4-nets, so you answered that question for us already. I was being ironic ;-) I'm not sure that TLS would cause more problems than any other packets, but as you point out, the exercise is bound to be full of pooh traps as yet undiscovered. FTP should be interesting, for a start. But for most things, why would swapping an IP address in the packet header cause any kind of problem as long as it was done consistently? Apparently Cisco routers manage to sort this all out as a matter of course, which goes some way to explaining why they cost so much. There are lots of corporate networks on 10.x.x.x, and I'm told this kind of caper is used to sort them out when they collide. Paying for a Cisco VPN could easily work out cheaper than reconfiguring a large corporate LAN, but I don't have the budget for either. Unfortunately this goes beyond my current knowledge of FreeBSD's networking layers so I may be busy for some time. Regards, Frank. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 18 11:51:44 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11B0512C for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 11:51:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from terje@elde.net) Received: from keepquiet.net (keepquiet.net [78.46.162.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5570C239C for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 11:51:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.130.10.194] (cm-84.210.76.250.getinternet.no [84.210.76.250]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: terje@elde.net) by keepquiet.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9A3CA2E40B; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 13:51:34 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: VPN where local private address collide Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Terje Elde In-Reply-To: <52109FF8.7010301@fjl.co.uk> Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 13:51:30 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <4653241B-5254-4B23-8D87-90355EFFB07B@elde.net> References: <520E5EC0.5090105@fjl.co.uk> <9FB6809B-DD5D-4A04-8BD9-0271FAC03181@elde.net> <520F53A2.80707@fjl.co.uk> <520F8AA8.8030407@fjl.co.uk> <1FF39756-0555-4CD8-95B7-862F9644CF78@elde.net> <52109FF8.7010301@fjl.co.uk> To: Frank Leonhardt X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 11:51:44 -0000 On 18. aug. 2013, at 12.20, Frank Leonhardt wrote: > I'm not sure that TLS would cause more problems than any other = packets, but as you point out, the exercise is bound to be full of pooh = traps as yet undiscovered. FTP should be interesting, for a start. But = for most things, why would swapping an IP address in the packet header = cause any kind of problem as long as it was done consistently? I was cutting corners and trying to keep the reply short (was on = cellphone at the time), and I think the word headers might have lead to = some crosstalk. For TCP/IP itself, just consistently swapping the IP would solve the = problem. That'd fix a lot, and things like like ssh and http should = work fine with that. If we look at other things though, like SIP, it's not that easy. I'm = using SIP as an example just because it illustrates the point nicely, = and I know it well. For SIP, you'd have the IP in multiple places: TCP/IP - the connection to the server. SIP - The application protocol RTP - Payload in the application protocol, carrying media-metadata Now, you'd get the connection to the server (TCP/IP), but for = registering against the SIP-server, the client would include it's IP in = the SIP-layer as well, in a http-like header. It'd tell the server = where it would want to be contacted for things like incoming calls. = Initially this would point to the clients perspective of the IP, and not = to the IP it were to carry after NAT. That is, the client would be able = to register, but for incoming calls the server would try to contact the = IP in the wrong place. For placing calls, you'd also have information about where media-streams = should go in RTP, both IP and port numbers. This would also carry wrong = information if you're merely changing the IP/port in TCP/IP-layers. Both of these can be resolved wither in the router/firewall/NAT-box, or = worked around on the server, but it's not pretty by a long shot, and = it's completely avoidable if you can avoid the NAT. > There are lots of corporate networks on 10.x.x.x, and I'm told this = kind of caper is used to sort them out when they collide. Paying for a = Cisco VPN could easily work out cheaper than reconfiguring a large = corporate LAN, but I don't have the budget for either. This kind of thing *can* be used to sort out colliding subnets, but that = doesn't mean it *should* be used to resolve the issue(s). You mentioned that a Cisco-guy said this would work, and explained = details of how to do it. I'm thinking that the same Cisco-guy could also give details on how to = drop a rack full of Juniper-equipment out of a 10th floor window, in = order to replace it with Cisco-gear. It's quite possible to do that, = but again, that doesn't mean you should. I think the gist of the issue here is that you have a problem, and = you're (correctly) thinking you can solve a lot if you NAT the two = networks together. That's not wrong, it's completely true. You can get = a lot to work in that way. Then you also have some random-looking guy on a mailing-list telling you = that "Yes, you can do that. But you shouldn't". I get how hard it can = be to take that kind of advice, especially when you know and have been = told that it's quite possible. If you really, really want to explore that route, then here's one way to = go about it: Use the VPN just to get the link up, don't worry about using NAT with = MPD. It's nice to keep all of the nat/firewall-bits in a single place, = and pf is a good solution to it. If you're running the VPN off of the primary gateway, this should be = fairly straight-forward, and you should be able to use something like = this: pf.conf on gateway/vpn-endpoint in lan_a: ---- lan_a =3D "192.168.0.0/24" lan_b =3D "192.168.0.0/24" vpn_a =3D "192.168.1.0/24" vpn_b =3D "192.168.2.0/24" binat on $vpn_if from $lan_a to any -> $vpn_a ---- pf.conf on gateway/vpn-endpoint in lan_b: ---- lan_a =3D "192.168.0.0/24" lan_b =3D "192.168.0.0/24" vpn_a =3D "192.168.1.0/24" vpn_b =3D "192.168.2.0/24" binat on $vpn_if from $lan_b to any -> $vpn_b ---- The VPN-tunnel itself could ignore any concept of the conflicting = 192.168.0.0/24-range, and simply deal with 192.168.1.0/24 being on one = end, and 192.168.2.0/24 on the other. If you're standing in lan_a, and your local address is 192.168.0.182, = and you'd like to reach 192.168.0.17 in lan_b, you'd talk to = 192.168.2.17. In lan_a, the conneciton would be seen as 192.168.0.182 -> 192.168.2.17. Crossing the lan_a VPN-endpoing going into the tunnel, it'd get = rewritten to be 192.168.1.182 -> 192.168.2.17. Crossing the lan_b VPN-endpoint going into lan_b, it'd get rewritten to = be 192.168.1.182 -> 192.168.0.17 You'd then hit the right server. The response from 192.168.0.17 (in lan_b) would get routed back over the = VPN-tunnel, since it's sent to 192.168.1.182. That is, in lan_b the response would be 192.168.0.17 -> 192.168.1.182. Crossing the lan_b VPN-endpoing going into the tunnel, on the way back = to lan_a, it'd get rewritten to be 192.168.2.17 -> 192.168.1.182. Crossing the lan_a VPN-endpoing going from the tunnel, into lan_a, it'd = get rewritten to be 192.168.2.17 -> 192.168.0.182. This is what you want I think? (you'd have to fix DNS and routing as well, though routing would work = out if the VPN is on the default gateway). Now, if we take this setup, and go back to the example of SIP, so see = how it'd play out over this config: A phone at 192.168.0.200 in lan_a, registeres against the SIP-server at = 192.168.0.50 in lan_b. If we run the rewrites, the request comes in from 192.168.2.200 to the = SIP-server, and the SIP-servers response gets back through the same = routing and rewriting. All good, right? Well, it's not quite that easy. In the SIP-headers (not the IP or TCP headers), the phone will list = something like this: Contact: The server would register that the phone is available at 192.168.0.200 = (locally, in lan_b), while the server would actually need to send to = 192.168.2.200, in order to reach 192.168.0.200 in lan_a. Exactly how this would behave depends on a lot of factors, but you'd = quickly end up with a situation in which the phone *appears* to work, = can register against the server and call out (both client-initiated), = but where incoming calls just don't work (sent to 192.168.0.200 in = lan_b, rather than in lan_a). Then you'll not only have to debug the NAT-setup, but SIP as well. Again, there's different ways to solve this. You could do a similar = rewriting on the gateways for SIP as you do for IP, and you could solve = it on the server. Some SIP-servers actually include logic for this kind of thing by = default, but that logic might not be applied because this is private = IPs, which are often excluded from that kind of thing. You could always apply the logic, but then you'd be running calls = between two phones in lan_a over the VPN to lan_b and back again, = because of all of this would need to be solved for RTP-headers and = RTP-streams as well. Then you have to instantly turn into not only a networking and NAT = expert, but an expert on VoIP and the specific VoIP-solutions used as = well. All completely avoidable, if you were to renumber the networks instead. And SIP is just one example. (all of this is slightly simplified, and intending more to illustrate = the poing and explain how it can be done, than as full and extensive = documentation). Terje From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 18 12:17:49 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 797127F8 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 12:17:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from terje@elde.net) Received: from keepquiet.net (keepquiet.net [78.46.162.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 35A0424CF for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 12:17:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.130.10.194] (cm-84.210.76.250.getinternet.no [84.210.76.250]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: terje@elde.net) by keepquiet.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D10C52E40B; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 14:17:46 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: VPN where local private address collide Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Terje Elde In-Reply-To: Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 14:17:45 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <791847EC-8E72-4013-9157-7AD0ACB62A7D@elde.net> References: <520E5EC0.5090105@fjl.co.uk> <9FB6809B-DD5D-4A04-8BD9-0271FAC03181@elde.net> <520F53A2.80707@fjl.co.uk> <520F8AA8.8030407@fjl.co.uk> <1FF39756-0555-4CD8-95B7-862F9644CF78@elde.net> To: Adam Vande More X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , Frank Leonhardt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 12:17:49 -0000 On 18. aug. 2013, at 02.43, Adam Vande More wrote: > > What about SSL/TLS for example? How would the router swap the = header in an encrypted session? >=20 > Same as it would any sessions since only the payload is encrypted. = What Frank calls basic nat, most people call static nat(at least people = who have read enough Cisco docs) and it works just fine. Also you are = confusing headers. The point I was aiming for was that even if you were to swap the IPs in = the IP-header on the gateway, some protocols still reference the IPs = inside the TCP-payload, and while you can rewrite that on a NAT-box = using an application level gateway, you can not do that if the session = is using SSL or TLS. I was referring to headers *inside* the SSL/TLS-layers. I thought that = was obvious, but I see I might not have been clear enough. Yes, you can often still resolve it on the server, but just how messy = does one want to get stacking workaround on top of workaround, just to = avoid renumbering the network? Terje From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 18 14:49:05 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34A64C4 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 14:49:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vagabond@blackfoot.net) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00CD92A97 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 14:49:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id r7IEmec8068055; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 08:48:40 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from vagabond@blackfoot.net) Message-ID: <5210DEC8.8010608@blackfoot.net> Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 08:48:40 -0600 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130730 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: cpghost Subject: Re: Mouse Trails? References: <20130817173126.e6f52195.freebsd@ edvax.de> <52101E80.6060407@cordula.ws> In-Reply-To: <52101E80.6060407@cordula.ws> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Sun, 18 Aug 2013 08:48:41 -0600 (MDT) Cc: Polytropon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Walter Hurry X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 14:49:05 -0000 On 08/17/13 19:08, cpghost wrote: > On 08/17/13 18:14, Walter Hurry wrote: >> On Sat, 17 Aug 2013 17:31:26 +0200, Polytropon wrote: > Good ole Xeyes... ;-) But beware, xeyes crashes X server right now! Using > > xeyes-1.1.1 > xorg-server-1.7.7_8,1 > > on > FreeBSD 9.2-PRERELEASE #0 r253323 Sat Jul 13 21:00:32 CEST 2013 amd64 > > I'm not the only one who's got X server crashes with xeyes: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/2012-May/011833.html > > @Polytropon: what version of xeyes/xorg-server are you using? pkg_info | grep xeyes xeyes-1.1.1 A follow the mouse X demo pkg_info | grep xorg-server xorg-server-1.7.7_8,1 X.Org X server and related programs Works fine here, amd64. How soon does it crash? First mouse movement, program startup, or what? The behavior I see is: mouse is visible start typing in xterm and cursor disappears xeyes comes up with eyes pointing to where cursor was a second or so later the cursor reappears move the cursor and eyes follow it Gary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 18 16:29:37 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68A466AD for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 16:29:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpghost@cordula.ws) Received: from mail-ea0-f174.google.com (mail-ea0-f174.google.com [209.85.215.174]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE8932EEE for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 16:29:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ea0-f174.google.com with SMTP id z15so1852651ead.19 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 09:29:29 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=a1035DLt/KS/J20orec74RHB/o3ITisTke5keVMbeRc=; b=nd3APAo0ySagJrIbKrKFgmK7a0IYafQloTJMIrqkldoibyfOjZkk3m2HsKOymkIbPv 4+7cKhHmNq+xs8jpAnO0jmQBDHGVhe8JkpNjKRz9816RjdmXK8zuABGnmK86RqOMUQPe Qb9iEI7lkUI0J0LJLkaO2Caq4DfQvJhbtoSCcF98yjnk+jlJsC80GcJF0gCWnmjLdTkg m/7VSJLPg3qAqlZXnWme9n2KW4Vi/M28t6yOO+KQRXNPdKPBZ6rNoA5dlhf5ATdHwOz7 MwDhTLfpFetFVBs6xEBq+L2Yp2Hhg0HxW68YdQX5+b0GHZ+6IK/5Bd0fWJGZT3QAI/0i +P9Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkfkmYCUVQn25P3JZeGoSYvoPdUqf0mfUP9RgcAlXqsWnCZz2PvlcvcPRAaDijBgTeBjJjA X-Received: by 10.14.103.69 with SMTP id e45mr4422891eeg.51.1376843369481; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 09:29:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from phenom.cordula.ws (p5DDDB42B.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [93.221.180.43]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id t6sm11157174eel.12.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 18 Aug 2013 09:29:28 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5210F663.2070508@cordula.ws> Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 18:29:23 +0200 From: cpghost User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130711 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Gary Aitken Subject: Re: Mouse Trails? References: <20130817173126.e6f52195.freebsd@ edvax.de> <52101E80.6060407@cordula.ws> <5210DEC8.8010608@blackfoot.net> In-Reply-To: <5210DEC8.8010608@blackfoot.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 16:29:37 -0000 On 08/18/13 16:48, Gary Aitken wrote: > On 08/17/13 19:08, cpghost wrote: >> On 08/17/13 18:14, Walter Hurry wrote: >>> On Sat, 17 Aug 2013 17:31:26 +0200, Polytropon wrote: > >> Good ole Xeyes... ;-) But beware, xeyes crashes X server right now! Using >> >> xeyes-1.1.1 >> xorg-server-1.7.7_8,1 >> >> on >> FreeBSD 9.2-PRERELEASE #0 r253323 Sat Jul 13 21:00:32 CEST 2013 amd64 >> >> I'm not the only one who's got X server crashes with xeyes: >> >> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/2012-May/011833.html >> >> @Polytropon: what version of xeyes/xorg-server are you using? > > pkg_info | grep xeyes > xeyes-1.1.1 A follow the mouse X demo > pkg_info | grep xorg-server > xorg-server-1.7.7_8,1 X.Org X server and related programs > > Works fine here, amd64. > > How soon does it crash? > First mouse movement, program startup, or what? At program startup. Using fluxbox here. I'll try with another WM. Maybe it's a WM problem? No other programs cause X server crashes here. I must say that it caught me by surprise! > The behavior I see is: > mouse is visible > start typing in xterm and cursor disappears > xeyes comes up with eyes pointing to where cursor was > a second or so later the cursor reappears > move the cursor and eyes follow it > > Gary > -cpghost -- Cordula's Web. http://www.cordula.ws/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 18 16:39:55 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A2DF810 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 16:39:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk) Received: from bs1.fjl.org.uk (bs1.fjl.org.uk [84.45.41.196]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D912A2F5E for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 16:39:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.0.31] (84.93.185.45.homesurf.pte-ag1.dyn.plus.net [84.93.185.45] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by bs1.fjl.org.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r7IGdn9s080621 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 18 Aug 2013 17:39:50 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk) Message-ID: <5210F8D5.5040507@fjl.co.uk> Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 17:39:49 +0100 From: Frank Leonhardt Organization: Frank Leonhardt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Terje Elde Subject: Re: VPN where local private address collide References: <520E5EC0.5090105@fjl.co.uk> <9FB6809B-DD5D-4A04-8BD9-0271FAC03181@elde.net> <520F53A2.80707@fjl.co.uk> <520F8AA8.8030407@fjl.co.uk> <1FF39756-0555-4CD8-95B7-862F9644CF78@elde.net> <52109FF8.7010301@fjl.co.uk> <4653241B-5254-4B23-8D87-90355EFFB07B@elde.net> In-Reply-To: <4653241B-5254-4B23-8D87-90355EFFB07B@elde.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , Frank Leonhardt X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: frank2@fjl.co.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 16:39:55 -0000 On 18/08/2013 12:51, Terje Elde wrote: > On 18. aug. 2013, at 12.20, Frank Leonhardt wrote: >> I'm not sure that TLS would cause more problems than any other packets, but as you point out, the exercise is bound to be full of pooh traps as yet undiscovered. FTP should be interesting, for a start. But for most things, why would swapping an IP address in the packet header cause any kind of problem as long as it was done consistently? > I was cutting corners and trying to keep the reply short (was on cellphone at the time), and I think the word headers might have lead to some crosstalk. > > For TCP/IP itself, just consistently swapping the IP would solve the problem. That'd fix a lot, and things like like ssh and http should work fine with that. > > If we look at other things though, like SIP, it's not that easy. I'm using SIP as an example just because it illustrates the point nicely, and I know it well. > > For SIP, you'd have the IP in multiple places: > > TCP/IP - the connection to the server. > SIP - The application protocol > RTP - Payload in the application protocol, carrying media-metadata > > Now, you'd get the connection to the server (TCP/IP), but for registering against the SIP-server, the client would include it's IP in the SIP-layer as well, in a http-like header. It'd tell the server where it would want to be contacted for things like incoming calls. Initially this would point to the clients perspective of the IP, and not to the IP it were to carry after NAT. That is, the client would be able to register, but for incoming calls the server would try to contact the IP in the wrong place. > > For placing calls, you'd also have information about where media-streams should go in RTP, both IP and port numbers. This would also carry wrong information if you're merely changing the IP/port in TCP/IP-layers. > > Both of these can be resolved wither in the router/firewall/NAT-box, or worked around on the server, but it's not pretty by a long shot, and it's completely avoidable if you can avoid the NAT. > >> There are lots of corporate networks on 10.x.x.x, and I'm told this kind of caper is used to sort them out when they collide. Paying for a Cisco VPN could easily work out cheaper than reconfiguring a large corporate LAN, but I don't have the budget for either. > This kind of thing *can* be used to sort out colliding subnets, but that doesn't mean it *should* be used to resolve the issue(s). > > You mentioned that a Cisco-guy said this would work, and explained details of how to do it. > > I'm thinking that the same Cisco-guy could also give details on how to drop a rack full of Juniper-equipment out of a 10th floor window, in order to replace it with Cisco-gear. It's quite possible to do that, but again, that doesn't mean you should. > > I think the gist of the issue here is that you have a problem, and you're (correctly) thinking you can solve a lot if you NAT the two networks together. That's not wrong, it's completely true. You can get a lot to work in that way. > > Then you also have some random-looking guy on a mailing-list telling you that "Yes, you can do that. But you shouldn't". I get how hard it can be to take that kind of advice, especially when you know and have been told that it's quite possible. > > If you really, really want to explore that route, then here's one way to go about it: > > Use the VPN just to get the link up, don't worry about using NAT with MPD. It's nice to keep all of the nat/firewall-bits in a single place, and pf is a good solution to it. > > If you're running the VPN off of the primary gateway, this should be fairly straight-forward, and you should be able to use something like this: > > pf.conf on gateway/vpn-endpoint in lan_a: > ---- > lan_a = "192.168.0.0/24" > lan_b = "192.168.0.0/24" > vpn_a = "192.168.1.0/24" > vpn_b = "192.168.2.0/24" > > binat on $vpn_if from $lan_a to any -> $vpn_a > ---- > > pf.conf on gateway/vpn-endpoint in lan_b: > ---- > lan_a = "192.168.0.0/24" > lan_b = "192.168.0.0/24" > vpn_a = "192.168.1.0/24" > vpn_b = "192.168.2.0/24" > > binat on $vpn_if from $lan_b to any -> $vpn_b > ---- > > The VPN-tunnel itself could ignore any concept of the conflicting 192.168.0.0/24-range, and simply deal with 192.168.1.0/24 being on one end, and 192.168.2.0/24 on the other. > > > If you're standing in lan_a, and your local address is 192.168.0.182, and you'd like to reach 192.168.0.17 in lan_b, you'd talk to 192.168.2.17. > > In lan_a, the conneciton would be seen as 192.168.0.182 -> 192.168.2.17. > > Crossing the lan_a VPN-endpoing going into the tunnel, it'd get rewritten to be 192.168.1.182 -> 192.168.2.17. > Crossing the lan_b VPN-endpoint going into lan_b, it'd get rewritten to be 192.168.1.182 -> 192.168.0.17 > > You'd then hit the right server. > > The response from 192.168.0.17 (in lan_b) would get routed back over the VPN-tunnel, since it's sent to 192.168.1.182. > > That is, in lan_b the response would be 192.168.0.17 -> 192.168.1.182. > > Crossing the lan_b VPN-endpoing going into the tunnel, on the way back to lan_a, it'd get rewritten to be 192.168.2.17 -> 192.168.1.182. > Crossing the lan_a VPN-endpoing going from the tunnel, into lan_a, it'd get rewritten to be 192.168.2.17 -> 192.168.0.182. > > This is what you want I think? > > (you'd have to fix DNS and routing as well, though routing would work out if the VPN is on the default gateway). > > > Now, if we take this setup, and go back to the example of SIP, so see how it'd play out over this config: > > A phone at 192.168.0.200 in lan_a, registeres against the SIP-server at 192.168.0.50 in lan_b. > > If we run the rewrites, the request comes in from 192.168.2.200 to the SIP-server, and the SIP-servers response gets back through the same routing and rewriting. > > All good, right? > > Well, it's not quite that easy. > > In the SIP-headers (not the IP or TCP headers), the phone will list something like this: > > Contact: > > The server would register that the phone is available at 192.168.0.200 (locally, in lan_b), while the server would actually need to send to 192.168.2.200, in order to reach 192.168.0.200 in lan_a. > > Exactly how this would behave depends on a lot of factors, but you'd quickly end up with a situation in which the phone *appears* to work, can register against the server and call out (both client-initiated), but where incoming calls just don't work (sent to 192.168.0.200 in lan_b, rather than in lan_a). > > Then you'll not only have to debug the NAT-setup, but SIP as well. > > Again, there's different ways to solve this. You could do a similar rewriting on the gateways for SIP as you do for IP, and you could solve it on the server. > > Some SIP-servers actually include logic for this kind of thing by default, but that logic might not be applied because this is private IPs, which are often excluded from that kind of thing. > > You could always apply the logic, but then you'd be running calls between two phones in lan_a over the VPN to lan_b and back again, because of all of this would need to be solved for RTP-headers and RTP-streams as well. > > Then you have to instantly turn into not only a networking and NAT expert, but an expert on VoIP and the specific VoIP-solutions used as well. > > All completely avoidable, if you were to renumber the networks instead. > > And SIP is just one example. > > > (all of this is slightly simplified, and intending more to illustrate the poing and explain how it can be done, than as full and extensive documentation). Hi Terje, Warnings about how something should be a last resort are entirely appropriate; there's no need to justify them to me. Even if you knew me (and might therefore not feel the need to warn me), this list is read by many people for answers - not just the original questioner. SIP/RTP over NAT is a great example of something you should never do, VPN or otherwise. In my view you shouldn't be running SIP VoIP on your data network anyway, for all sorts of security reasons. Your description of the scheme is pretty much what I had in mind. I hadn't thought of using PF but I'll take a look. I'm NOT well up on FreeBSD firewalls in general. The Cisco guy, incidentally, works for BT - I wouldn't say he's wedded to Cisco. I also hate to admit it, but he seems to manage to solve any weird networking requirement using Cisco kit. This could be down to lots of good IOS programming manuals and courses rather than any natural superiority, but I'm still struggling to find documenation on how to get a simple NAPT loopback working on FreeBSD. Incidentally, in the real-world situation that triggered the question I shall probably configure the LAN in to two subnets. The majority of kit can be migrated to a new subnet and he industrial kit that can't can stay where it is. Its the PCs and servers that need to be accessible across the VPN, not the machine tools. It's probably going to be the easy way to fix it, but it's still a bodge! Regards, Frank. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 18 16:49:26 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1214D917 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 16:49:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dacoder@dcoder.net) Received: from ns0.dcoder.net (ns3.dcoder.net [128.177.28.124]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E517D2FC6 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 16:49:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ns0.dcoder.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id B58855DB66; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 12:49:13 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 12:49:13 -0400 From: david coder To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: freebsd-update fails to tfetch public key Message-ID: <20130818164913.GA10965@mail3.dcoder.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 16:49:26 -0000 freebsd-update whatever on 9.2-PRERELEASE yields "Fetching public key from ... failed." using the freebsd-update.conf that comes w/the system. i must be doing something wrong. what? david coder From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 18 16:55:50 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 255DDB39 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 16:55:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5DD22025 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 16:55:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VB6GT-0001CV-Av for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 18:55:41 +0200 Received: from cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com ([86.21.186.149]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 18:55:41 +0200 Received: from walterhurry by cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 18:55:41 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Walter Hurry Subject: Re: Mouse Trails? Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 16:55:20 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 44 Message-ID: References: < 52101E80.6060407@cordula.ws> <5210DEC8.8010608@blackfoot.net> <5210F663. 2070508@cordula.ws> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com User-Agent: Pan/0.139 (Sexual Chocolate; GIT bf56508 git://git.gnome.org/pan2) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 16:55:50 -0000 On Sun, 18 Aug 2013 18:29:23 +0200, cpghost wrote: > On 08/18/13 16:48, Gary Aitken wrote: >> On 08/17/13 19:08, cpghost wrote: >>> On 08/17/13 18:14, Walter Hurry wrote: >>>> On Sat, 17 Aug 2013 17:31:26 +0200, Polytropon wrote: >> >>> Good ole Xeyes... ;-) But beware, xeyes crashes X server right now! >>> Using >>> >>> xeyes-1.1.1 xorg-server-1.7.7_8,1 >>> >>> on FreeBSD 9.2-PRERELEASE #0 r253323 Sat Jul 13 21:00:32 CEST 2013 >>> amd64 >>> >>> I'm not the only one who's got X server crashes with xeyes: >>> >>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-x11/2012-May/011833.html >>> >>> @Polytropon: what version of xeyes/xorg-server are you using? >> >> pkg_info | grep xeyes xeyes-1.1.1 A follow the mouse X demo >> pkg_info | grep xorg-server xorg-server-1.7.7_8,1 X.Org X server and >> related programs >> >> Works fine here, amd64. >> >> How soon does it crash? >> First mouse movement, program startup, or what? > > At program startup. > > Using fluxbox here. I'll try with another WM. Maybe it's a WM problem? > > No other programs cause X server crashes here. I must say that it caught > me by surprise! > >> The behavior I see is: >> mouse is visible start typing in xterm and cursor disappears xeyes >> comes up with eyes pointing to where cursor was a second or so later >> the cursor reappears move the cursor and eyes follow it No problem for me since Polytropon suggested it. I'm on amd64 - WM is Openbox. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 18 18:26:48 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA4F8C0 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 18:26:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from juris.kaminskis@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x236.google.com (mail-wi0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D09624F7 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 18:26:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id hi8so2311657wib.15 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 11:26:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=T6EiHZM1ElEMdVE27a89puIwaRic/KEA7SOo9QM6LOc=; b=hQUQgu/P+24ovPkSobP7KCyI5HLrViZkhF9srZBYOjAE344vL+bK9bO5crbnXEJPM+ ldrePX4Gr+UPFW0RVbRilWBoXsgI/4twX4U48RogcFg31k0RF0SLLAA8Oz9jWdGWE3GU qutB2WdQP0yVei+3oj1yF95FY6nCBIzX0x9X2Kai2GnYR168vHy7lPZ7eMtVH7M37LKg fn/wMld92LjNkmXyyWCngtb/8s9lFn2YyzSsGti9xI1KzfbIU5OjZfPd4shfqP9DmSAd Ru9TL+vNY5Wp/f0Fps9x7O6Ide1bG3mrJw1Z/da6V7qvqEu8GjBXkqtdFtZPh4gNe7R2 Wcww== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.12.243 with SMTP id b19mr5284063wic.18.1376850406457; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 11:26:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.83.225 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 11:26:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 21:26:46 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Setup HP Laserjet 1120m over network with LPD From: Juris Kaminskis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 18:26:49 -0000 as suggested i tried now foo2xqx filter. My printcap entry: ----------------------- HP:\ :lp=:\ :sh:\ :mx#0:\ :rm=192.168.1.105:\ :rp=raw:\ :sd=/var/spool/hp:\ :if=/usr/bin/foo2xqx-wrapper:\ :lf=/var/log/lpd-errs:\ ----------------------- Now I get following errors in log file: ----------------------- Aug 18 21:16:17 laptops lpd[11798]: lpd startup: logging=0 Aug 18 21:16:17 laptops foo2xqx-wrapper: foo2xqx-wrapper -w132 -l66 -i0 -n root Aug 18 21:16:18 laptops lpd[11799]: restarting HP Aug 18 21:16:18 laptops foo2xqx-wrapper: foo2xqx-wrapper -w132 -l66 -i0 -n root Aug 18 21:16:19 laptops lpd[11799]: restarting HP Aug 18 21:16:19 laptops foo2xqx-wrapper: foo2xqx-wrapper -w132 -l66 -i0 -n root Aug 18 21:16:19 laptops lpd[11799]: restarting HP Aug 18 21:16:19 laptops foo2xqx-wrapper: foo2xqx-wrapper -w132 -l66 -i0 -n root Aug 18 21:16:19 laptops lpd[11799]: restarting HP Aug 18 21:16:19 laptops foo2xqx-wrapper: foo2xqx-wrapper -w132 -l66 -i0 -n root Aug 18 21:16:19 laptops lpd[11799]: HP: job could not be sent to remote host (cf Aug 18 21:16:20 laptops lpd[11799]: mail sent to user root about job o ----------------------- why foo2xqx-wrapper is forcing restart for the printer? 2013/8/6 Juris Kaminskis > > after several trials and errors and reading through FreeBSD handbook I am > at dead end on how to proceed further, hope someone can guide me. > > my /etc/printcap entry: > ----------------------- > HP:\ > :rm=192.168.1.105:sd=/var/spool/hp:lf=/var/log/lpd-errs:\ > :if=/usr/local/libexec/hp-network: > ----------------------- > > my /usr/local/libexec/hp-network entry: > ----------------------- > #!/bin/sh > # > # hp-network - Text filter for HP printer `NPI2B483C' listening > # on port 9100. Installed in /usr/local/libexec/hp-network > # > exec /usr/libexec/lpr/lpf "$@" | /usr/local/libexec/netprint 192.168.1.105 > 9100 > ----------------------- > > my /usr/local/libexec/netprint entry: > ----------------------- > !/usr/bin/perl -w > # > # netprint - Text filter for printer attached to network > # Installed in /usr/local/libexec/netprint > # > > $#ARGV eq 1 || die "Usage: $0 "; > > $printer_host = $ARGV[0]; > $printer_port = $ARGV[1]; > use Socket; > > $protocol = getprotobyname('tcp'); > $address = inet_aton("192.168.1.105"); > $sockaddr = sockaddr_in($printer_port, $address); > > socket(PRINTER, PF_INET, SOCK_STREAM, $protocol) > || die "Can't create TCP/IP stream socket: $!"; > connect(PRINTER, $sockaddr) || die "Can't contact $printer_host: $!"; > > while () { print PRINTER; } exit 0; > ----------------------- > > Now my /var/log/lpd-errs is empty and in spool directory I have following > after running command lptest 20 5 | lpr -P HP : > > content of /var/spool/hp > total 16 > -rw-r--r-- 1 root juris 4 Aug 6 21:55 .seq > -rw-rw---- 1 daemon juris 70 Aug 6 21:55 cfA014laptops > -rw-rw---- 1 root juris 605 Aug 6 21:55 dfA014laptops > -rw-rw-r-- 1 root juris 0 Aug 6 21:55 errs.ukc0YLC > -rw-rw-r-- 1 root juris 5 Aug 6 21:55 lock > > My printer is not responding in any way, it keeps on flashing Ready. it is > on the internal network having ip 192.168.1.105 > > thanks > Juris > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 18 19:08:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2DF0847 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:08:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86F5426B4 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:08:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [188.174.214.67] (helo=localhost.my.domain) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VB6LL-0005I8-76; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:00:43 +0200 Received: from localhost.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.7/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r7IH0e4S001983; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:00:41 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.7/8.14.3/Submit) id r7IH0dY2001982; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:00:39 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:00:39 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: undelete files in msdosfs Message-ID: <20130818170039.GA1954@La-Habana> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT r214444 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 188.174.214.67 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:08:02 -0000 Hello, After a nice day in the fields, my wife deleted accidently the pictures in her cam; the microSD mounts fine in FreeBSD as -t msdosfs; do we have some FreeBSD 10-CUR tool to undelete the files, as there are some for M$? Thanks matthias -- Matthias Apitz | /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: www.asciiribbon.org E-mail: guru@unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X - No proprietary attachments phone: +49-170-4527211 | / \ - Respect for open standards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 18 19:18:37 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11138B9B for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:18:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Received: from mail.monochrome.org (e.febed1.client.atlantech.net [209.190.254.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9CD0273A for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:18:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.11] ([192.168.1.11]) by mail.monochrome.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r7IJ1oMs052456; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 15:01:50 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from chris@monochrome.org) Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 15:01:25 -0400 (EDT) From: Chris Hill To: Juris Kaminskis Subject: Re: Setup HP Laserjet 1120m over network with LPD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:18:37 -0000 On Sun, 18 Aug 2013, Juris Kaminskis wrote: > as suggested i tried now foo2xqx filter. My printcap entry: > ----------------------- > HP:\ > :lp=:\ > :sh:\ > :mx#0:\ > :rm=192.168.1.105:\ > :rp=raw:\ > :sd=/var/spool/hp:\ > :if=/usr/bin/foo2xqx-wrapper:\ > :lf=/var/log/lpd-errs:\ > ----------------------- ^ That backslash needs to go, for one thing. The backslash indicates continuation on the next line, but I don't know what would happen if there is no next line. In other words, the last line should NOT end with a backslash. HTH. -- Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org ** [ Busy Expunging ] From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 18 19:18:32 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6049CB8D for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:18:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kernel@webrz.net) Received: from thetys.cloudzeeland.nl (webrz.xs4all.nl [83.161.133.58]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A92A2738 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:18:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from thetys.cloudzeeland.nl (thetys.cloudzeeland.nl [10.10.10.31]) by thetys.cloudzeeland.nl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F3716445AA for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 21:14:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [10.10.10.44] (chimea.cloudzeeland.nl [10.10.10.44]) by thetys.cloudzeeland.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 21B12164455D for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 21:14:54 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <52111D47.1060903@webrz.net> Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 21:15:19 +0200 From: Jos Chrispijn User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" Subject: ipfw gateway rerouting Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP on thetys.cloudzeeland.nl X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:18:32 -0000 Can someone please hint me to to good explanatory site that explains how to reroute a network server to different/non standard network gateway(s) with ipfw? thanks, Jos Chrispijn From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 18 19:23:22 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 318A9ECA for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:23:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-qe0-x234.google.com (mail-qe0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c02::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D715D27A5 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:23:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qe0-f52.google.com with SMTP id a11so1277298qen.39 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 12:23:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=IlauokhtZ6vfjB+GoAUw62BUuAH42ckuZ/+iNos9818=; b=D3ZkzPaSJ0YUurZeIPQp13otjdT537yMfmoEY9KTaOEd2KHtSmAAghsDWgrh4FjXmi mrT9YoWPVxTmopoqJtz3PyGUdLpv3Yxz/oK30DdJggmJFAEdV3jxb60NBVzetGMAEuDi AzPUWEqTj69Ar7U5GmsXF0Pq9FReRh4LBmBjY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:reply-to:organization:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=IlauokhtZ6vfjB+GoAUw62BUuAH42ckuZ/+iNos9818=; b=CJZo42zFQJI++La7dkY7wBiSEN9i4aX8By5S62WZSs5Qf1np9vlivX3WJzijQXbF1N SStG3elBKGC7v/bG/SAoOzzR0OB3vQk1b0OOWN7pgY7uWXB5G0EmFNrl0NWkGLEbWjaN f4vHFOeR12QYdp6xJ+dwkKEdGFSDk3w6WHtW7y3tSJKLLpJ3By1zei54avXTUulzSWEJ 0dTNcpJHwyKTkAY4pUwO4wA8gpnOdOtONS4J5XXzwEOPYy+5ciTpg3lnXc9yeSPHMq+J XEo+6041Pj1BMksxun7Y23vm5LoN18fwKheCPRWksxCiFvAQWzbJ4p5TkmJfulI27DQ6 kBsg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmRZouUcXQ+eg1BXJepi1AiSvIE3lRltZZogBeyud0IDhiODqgJctksBCknz68msqLEcZrL X-Received: by 10.49.15.66 with SMTP id v2mr3012475qec.73.1376853800991; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 12:23:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id u8sm11310139qey.5.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 18 Aug 2013 12:23:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3cJ7Tf4R5zz2CG62 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 15:23:18 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 15:23:18 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Subject: Re: undelete files in msdosfs Message-ID: <20130818152318.20445246@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <20130818170039.GA1954@La-Habana> References: <20130818170039.GA1954@La-Habana> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:23:22 -0000 On Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:00:39 +0200 Matthias Apitz articulated: > After a nice day in the fields, my wife deleted accidently the > pictures in her cam; the microSD mounts fine in FreeBSD as -t > msdosfs; do we have some FreeBSD 10-CUR tool to undelete the files, > as there are some for M$? There are dozens of Microsoft based applications that are intended to undelete a file, assuming you have not otherwise over written the file or messed up the file system. I even saw one designed just for cameras. Google is your friend. -- Jerry â™” Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 18 19:24:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88433E7 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:24:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from juris.kaminskis@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-x22f.google.com (mail-wg0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1BF2A27BE for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:24:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f47.google.com with SMTP id j13so2825967wgh.2 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 12:24:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=FG/QU23DeHRsEjd8zY3WMHeJBztgrgDxBFeeeiqGx8g=; b=Op779Pu0aphgrpLs79blKs6xvi3nuCe3SfkANgEtSVkRnVTvA5FdpPeLWg1vlQYton tUwIhik0qozJBsJk5GR36/Cs9EiTYIp1itMxlmyrOX+HW4grjpBV+Frq1tPIZQ9cNLdw 0mkIA84YDMh2/mhz8Xjt62KRCUmTbMRqvNI3rG8kOyHgZbgIT1rSqrYQpVyKnm2JBUQ0 aM1mLuoGtqWE0x1nIYm34dBeb7EhnV+8dtGFFxQJhFWGJVXrJhY2F95c2i4ZBz9qjKxh EZUDze2ruA9L6SHkM53l/ISAblEjjzkHLIeMpgj4gaIoKLO1wyMX4ZBvT5r60N4Xzdrj UD3Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.36.176 with SMTP id r16mr6358820wij.44.1376853849503; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 12:24:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.83.225 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 12:24:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.83.225 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 12:24:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 22:24:09 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Setup HP Laserjet 1120m over network with LPD From: Juris Kaminskis To: Chris Hill Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-13 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:24:11 -0000 Yes indeed, i corrected, but i have still the problem 2013. gada 18. aug. 22:01 "Chris Hill" rakst=EEja: > On Sun, 18 Aug 2013, Juris Kaminskis wrote: > > as suggested i tried now foo2xqx filter. My printcap entry: >> ----------------------- >> HP:\ >> :lp=3D:\ >> :sh:\ >> :mx#0:\ >> :rm=3D192.168.1.105:\ >> :rp=3Draw:\ >> :sd=3D/var/spool/hp:\ >> :if=3D/usr/bin/foo2xqx-wrapper:\ >> :lf=3D/var/log/lpd-errs:\ >> ----------------------- >> > ^ > That backslash needs to go, for one thing. The backslash indicates > continuation on the next line, but I don't know what would happen if ther= e > is no next line. In other words, the last line should NOT end with a > backslash. > > HTH. > > -- > Chris Hill chris@monochrome.org > ** [ Busy Expunging ] > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 18 19:28:17 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 947A741B for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:28:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 596F827ED for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:28:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-92-43.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.92.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38C233CBE2; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 21:28:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r7IJS3PR002530; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 21:28:03 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 21:28:03 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Matthias Apitz Subject: Re: undelete files in msdosfs Message-Id: <20130818212803.72ca7724.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20130818170039.GA1954@La-Habana> References: <20130818170039.GA1954@La-Habana> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:28:17 -0000 On Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:00:39 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote: > After a nice day in the fields, my wife deleted accidently the pictures > in her cam; the microSD mounts fine in FreeBSD as -t msdosfs; do we have > some FreeBSD 10-CUR tool to undelete the files, as there are some for M$? We have plenty of them. From my "unbelievable list of tools for data recovery" and regarding that you are trying to recover files from a camera: "photorec". It's in the ports collection. In the same context, "magicrescue" is worth mentioning. If they all fail, consider using TSK. Note: Do _not_ do ANY writes to the card! Mount it -o ro if needed. Make an 1:1 copy (using "dd_rescue" from ports), work with that copy. Everything that slips through fat fingers could reduce the chance of a successful recovery session. I know it. ;-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 18 19:28:58 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BF914B6 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:28:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk) Received: from bs1.fjl.org.uk (bs1.fjl.org.uk [84.45.41.196]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8825327FF for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:28:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.0.31] (84.93.185.45.homesurf.pte-ag1.dyn.plus.net [84.93.185.45] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by bs1.fjl.org.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r7IJSrfh008335 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 20:28:55 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk) Message-ID: <52112075.9060008@fjl.co.uk> Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 20:28:53 +0100 From: Frank Leonhardt Organization: Frank Leonhardt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: undelete files in msdosfs References: <20130818170039.GA1954@La-Habana> In-Reply-To: <20130818170039.GA1954@La-Habana> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: frank2@fjl.co.uk List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:28:58 -0000 I wrote something to do this a long time back, but I doubt I can find the source quickly. The easiest way would be to download a forensic live-CD like DEFT, which includes Undelete 360. Possibly over-kill but it's handy to have one around. Most of these forensic tools use a GUI. There is a program called fatback in the ports collection but I haven't tried it. The tools on these forensic live-CDs are likely to be more powerful by a long way. Regards, Frank. On 18/08/2013 18:00, Matthias Apitz wrote: > Hello, > > After a nice day in the fields, my wife deleted accidently the pictures > in her cam; the microSD mounts fine in FreeBSD as -t msdosfs; do we have > some FreeBSD 10-CUR tool to undelete the files, as there are some for M$? > Thanks > > matthias From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 18 19:29:50 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4A6B57F for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:29:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 673832815 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:29:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [89.204.155.30] (helo=tiny.Sisis.de) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VB8fb-0000yK-Q1 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 21:29:48 +0200 Received: from tiny.Sisis.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tiny.Sisis.de (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r7IJTj8L001011 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 21:29:45 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by tiny.Sisis.de (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id r7IJTj0Q001010 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 21:29:45 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: tiny.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 21:29:44 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: undelete files in msdosfs Message-ID: <20130818192943.GA1002@tiny.Sisis.de> References: <20130818170039.GA1954@La-Habana> <20130818152318.20445246@scorpio> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20130818152318.20445246@scorpio> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT r235646 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 89.204.155.30 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:29:50 -0000 El día Sunday, August 18, 2013 a las 03:23:18PM -0400, Jerry escribió: > On Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:00:39 +0200 > Matthias Apitz articulated: > > > After a nice day in the fields, my wife deleted accidently the > > pictures in her cam; the microSD mounts fine in FreeBSD as -t > > msdosfs; do we have some FreeBSD 10-CUR tool to undelete the files, > > as there are some for M$? > > There are dozens of Microsoft based applications that are intended to > undelete a file, assuming you have not otherwise over written the file > or messed up the file system. I even saw one designed just for cameras. > Google is your friend. Thanks for your reply, but luckily we do not have any Microsoft infected computer at home (and we will no have). matthias -- Sent from my FreeBSD netbook Matthias Apitz, , http://www.unixarea.de/ f: +49-170-4527211 UNIX since V7 on PDP-11, UNIX on mainframe since ESER 1055 (IBM /370) UNIX on x86 since SVR4.2 UnixWare 2.1.2, FreeBSD since 2.2.5 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 18 19:38:33 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E96148A6 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:38:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 999C12890 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:38:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r7IJcWnh080826; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 13:38:32 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id r7IJcW2t080823; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 13:38:32 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 13:38:32 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Juris Kaminskis Subject: Re: Setup HP Laserjet 1120m over network with LPD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 18 Aug 2013 13:38:32 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:38:34 -0000 On Sun, 18 Aug 2013, Juris Kaminskis wrote: > Yes indeed, i corrected, but i have still the problem Please don't top-post, it makes responding more difficult. lpd will restart a queue when it gets an error from a filter. Manually test the filter before trying to use it with lpd. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 18 19:47:08 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9E6AC10 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:47:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CE542919 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:47:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-92-43.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.92.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C97853C96C; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 21:47:06 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r7IJl1lO002584; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 21:47:01 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 21:47:01 +0200 From: Polytropon To: frank2@fjl.co.uk Subject: Re: undelete files in msdosfs Message-Id: <20130818214701.8c6fa6f5.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <52112075.9060008@fjl.co.uk> References: <20130818170039.GA1954@La-Habana> <52112075.9060008@fjl.co.uk> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:47:08 -0000 On Sun, 18 Aug 2013 20:28:53 +0100, Frank Leonhardt wrote: > I wrote something to do this a long time back, but I doubt I can find > the source quickly. The easiest way would be to download a forensic > live-CD like DEFT, which includes Undelete 360. Possibly over-kill but > it's handy to have one around. Most of these forensic tools use a GUI. Or UBCD, if I remember correctly. It also offers some of those tools, usually the text-mode variants (not CLI, but dialog-driven) which allow you to perform the tasks quickly and safely. > There is a program called fatback in the ports collection but I haven't > tried it. The tools on these forensic live-CDs are likely to be more > powerful by a long way. Most of the programs can be used from within FreeBSD. As I said, there are many of those available for free. Some of them require the user to _know_ what he does. The more complex the recovery task is, the more knowledge is involved. GUIs are good to hide this fact, and in worst case, you lose your data. Of course there is no problem delegating the recovery task to a service center for $$$. And sometimes, if you look close enough, you can see that those are using the free tools. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 18 20:01:38 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98175FB4 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 20:01:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from iamatt@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pd0-x22e.google.com (mail-pd0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 712ED29DB for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 20:01:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f174.google.com with SMTP id y13so4190956pdi.5 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 13:01:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=P6PL5cfCo4UMcBIZ981FuMwHEDlWGsbX/0tbwbIyyJ4=; b=eMaxSCmEnfayFS5RL6TGGviZbmqYg++Qs3ocQkrl73Av+NSiVJVVnoTe5P5n/1fBET arElGtJEgDe6mfyTx80tlwXdUR5vucMVh2FgrSq0bbWNbUq5hfKYZ/M3BAIY+6o8r0zT DUc/mFTXBDOPq4DOos23f4R3Cijv45O9CI23yXpcOoPG6guW7ggLcfXiD9HqpLocygxl WTdfAlw25FAf9fmhMdRUEzF8/dFo9L9CLDZPov34eEtGry/R4CLVhwvei6S5sAnU/E3a xtZ1Xybil/2iDbMUyfARaLiNlWBqPbrD2RSk6e1IempVm9UZigr8KBge6JRUwygwyNRT P3Kw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.67.5.9 with SMTP id ci9mr9353942pad.34.1376856098011; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 13:01:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.179.132 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 13:01:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.179.132 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 13:01:37 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130818192943.GA1002@tiny.Sisis.de> References: <20130818170039.GA1954@La-Habana> <20130818152318.20445246@scorpio> <20130818192943.GA1002@tiny.Sisis.de> Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 15:01:37 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: undelete files in msdosfs From: iamatt To: Matthias Apitz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 20:01:38 -0000 Its called backups. Not trying to be a dick but it's 2013. Not 1983. Plenty of online backup/archive options. As always. Test restores periodically. On Aug 18, 2013 2:30 PM, "Matthias Apitz" wrote: > El d=C3=ADa Sunday, August 18, 2013 a las 03:23:18PM -0400, Jerry escribi= =C3=B3: > > > On Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:00:39 +0200 > > Matthias Apitz articulated: > > > > > After a nice day in the fields, my wife deleted accidently the > > > pictures in her cam; the microSD mounts fine in FreeBSD as -t > > > msdosfs; do we have some FreeBSD 10-CUR tool to undelete the files, > > > as there are some for M$? > > > > There are dozens of Microsoft based applications that are intended to > > undelete a file, assuming you have not otherwise over written the file > > or messed up the file system. I even saw one designed just for cameras. > > Google is your friend. > > Thanks for your reply, but luckily we do not have any Microsoft infected > computer at home (and we will no have). > > matthias > > -- > Sent from my FreeBSD netbook > > Matthias Apitz, , http://www.unixarea.de/ f: > +49-170-4527211 > UNIX since V7 on PDP-11, UNIX on mainframe since ESER 1055 (IBM /370) > UNIX on x86 since SVR4.2 UnixWare 2.1.2, FreeBSD since 2.2.5 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 18 20:09:58 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE578366 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 20:09:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tomek.cedro@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qe0-x22d.google.com (mail-qe0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c02::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B25C22A2F for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 20:09:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qe0-f45.google.com with SMTP id nc12so1201335qeb.32 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 13:09:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=b2tC2ys5LSE+r57AKESoGJjJwaBpGRPaAYJsrewtVk0=; b=AQsoWDGYcFfhBEh09uxgfFeHSIP4c/lQbVks15cWpE55JJ8xkY/ziAHbw9Kox+OyEp GdCaZA4QDKw5etCZHdOv4zit6pvonXn88FiwaqazPsibOJw9s5JDEoeiPy3VwkZSfamD K1fw2LuEXmzf61h+TbaJjjBoSggB9vqUsUrKY+4vAUBM9n6tCzm71pI4gKQQVKcH0uuW OY0TpAz0mcWz+7fNOpiHnvq5PUjVKpxpaz21mxQcWJZVAha7nCneeKnIB8wUbbEsxbVy KXXBQxoKHw3B6vj2vA0HWnYSJBhJ08QpiPrRs7XNy5fEX6nU82tSbIZmP6L/BHhRFLiM vz2A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.81.146 with SMTP id a18mr10786935qey.41.1376856597891; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 13:09:57 -0700 (PDT) Sender: tomek.cedro@gmail.com Received: by 10.49.70.225 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 13:09:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130818170039.GA1954@La-Habana> References: <20130818170039.GA1954@La-Habana> Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 22:09:57 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Pp0NYj_Qi8CasbUkO6-jWm3hCm0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: undelete files in msdosfs From: CeDeROM To: Matthias Apitz Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 20:09:59 -0000 On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote: > After a nice day in the fields, my wife deleted accidently the pictures > in her cam; the microSD mounts fine in FreeBSD as -t msdosfs; do we have > some FreeBSD 10-CUR tool to undelete the files, as there are some for M$? /usr/ports/sysutils/testdisk http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/TestDisk -- CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 18 20:14:42 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8546D568 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 20:14:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 476AF2A7A for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 20:14:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-92-43.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.92.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA08B3C7C0; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 22:14:40 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r7IKEZtP002658; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 22:14:35 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 22:14:35 +0200 From: Polytropon To: iamatt Subject: Re: undelete files in msdosfs Message-Id: <20130818221435.8dab8c3f.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20130818170039.GA1954@La-Habana> <20130818152318.20445246@scorpio> <20130818192943.GA1002@tiny.Sisis.de> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Matthias Apitz , FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 20:14:42 -0000 On Sun, 18 Aug 2013 15:01:37 -0500, iamatt wrote: > Its called backups. Not trying to be a dick but it's 2013. Not 1983. But it doesn't help when Johnny Fatfingers presses the wrong buttons on the camera _prior_ to archiving the photos. :-) > Plenty of online backup/archive options. And local options, because you have to trust your online backup provider (except it's _yourself_ who provides and maintains the systems). > As always. Test restores > periodically. A backup that cannot be restored is _not_ a backup. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 18 20:16:13 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17A2D624 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 20:16:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDBDB2A8E for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 20:16:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-92-43.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.92.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E00D3C35F; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 22:16:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r7IKG6NQ002664; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 22:16:06 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 22:16:06 +0200 From: Polytropon To: CeDeROM Subject: Re: undelete files in msdosfs Message-Id: <20130818221606.ddca1e6a.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20130818170039.GA1954@La-Habana> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Matthias Apitz , FreeBSD Questions Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 20:16:13 -0000 On Sun, 18 Aug 2013 22:09:57 +0200, CeDeROM wrote: > On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > After a nice day in the fields, my wife deleted accidently the pictures > > in her cam; the microSD mounts fine in FreeBSD as -t msdosfs; do we have > > some FreeBSD 10-CUR tool to undelete the files, as there are some for M$? > > /usr/ports/sysutils/testdisk > > http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/TestDisk That one is also on my "famous list", and if I remember correctly, also part of the UBCD for "OS-less" use. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 18 20:50:23 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29052F31 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 20:50:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB6122C0B for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 20:50:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [46.244.154.146] (helo=localhost.my.domain) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VB9vX-0008K9-1r for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 22:50:19 +0200 Received: from localhost.my.domain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.7/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r7IKoGCB008541 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 22:50:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.7/8.14.3/Submit) id r7IKoGag008540 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 22:50:16 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 22:50:15 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: undelete files in msdosfs Message-ID: <20130818205015.GA8529@La-Habana> References: <20130818170039.GA1954@La-Habana> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 9.0-CURRENT r214444 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 46.244.154.146 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 20:50:23 -0000 El día Sunday, August 18, 2013 a las 10:09:57PM +0200, CeDeROM escribió: > On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 7:00 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > After a nice day in the fields, my wife deleted accidently the pictures > > in her cam; the microSD mounts fine in FreeBSD as -t msdosfs; do we have > > some FreeBSD 10-CUR tool to undelete the files, as there are some for M$? > > /usr/ports/sysutils/testdisk > > http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/TestDisk Thanks! This did what I was looking for. matthias -- Matthias Apitz | /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: www.asciiribbon.org E-mail: guru@unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X - No proprietary attachments phone: +49-170-4527211 | / \ - Respect for open standards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 18 23:02:13 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B543E86 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 23:02:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from petersontr@aol.com) Received: from omr-m09.mx.aol.com (omr-m09.mx.aol.com [64.12.143.82]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 395412223 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 23:02:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mtaomg-da02.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-da02.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.51.138]) by omr-m09.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id C48F5700000BD for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 18:56:12 -0400 (EDT) Received: from core-mid003c.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-mid003.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.104.67]) by mtaomg-da02.r1000.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id 98C47E000087 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 18:56:12 -0400 (EDT) To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: RE: Pre-sales question X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI X-MB-Message-Type: User MIME-Version: 1.0 From: petersontr@aol.com X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 37966-STANDARD Received: from 75.44.51.173 by webmail-d281.sysops.aol.com (205.188.93.230) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Sun, 18 Aug 2013 18:56:12 -0400 Message-Id: <8D06A7D4516F6B0-13B4-49618@webmail-d281.sysops.aol.com> X-Originating-IP: [75.44.51.173] Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 18:56:12 -0400 (EDT) x-aol-global-disposition: G DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mx.aol.com; s=20121107; t=1376866572; bh=P75jmKS4T45Kh3et6pVxzGIG/XWpoB8ZSiwlSGAhMCE=; h=From:To:Subject:Message-Id:Date:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=iushJ6LfgUBih/g6TzP+WMPcTi7vO9rWbNnGq3X0U6tJAVHzGm0iBMq3B/owBnBM3 5fU4o22XMpqbyxy5J0CZzWU+DAehUUFXIbHCbo3ZzyuHDJ93kpg9XRjpXQIFfi3raq kqo0GZUlIfOk9nKuJS8r1IWUDwJKN7uPcIFkjRrQ= x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d338a5211510c616d Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 23:02:13 -0000 Sir: I would like to know if your freebsd OS 9.1 suite on CD(DVD) can be install= ed, and then run, on a Dell Inspiron 531S? I looked-over your website, and = did not see a citation for that specific PC (though I did see it for others= ). For your reference, my PC has a AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual core processor 38= 00+ 2.01 GHz. The operating system on it right now (Vista) is 32-bit. The P= C can have up to 4GB of RAM. I have a 80GB Hard drive on it right now. I wo= uld like to "hitch" it to the PC using a USB cable. If version 9.1 does run on that machine, then I may order a copy for myself= . R.S.V.P., Glen Peterson Cedarburg, WI. PetersonTR@aol.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Aug 18 23:37:05 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 614863C3 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 23:37:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6724@bellsouth.net) Received: from nm4-vm1.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm4-vm1.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [216.109.114.112]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CEC6F2392 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 23:37:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [66.196.81.166] by nm4.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Aug 2013 23:34:27 -0000 Received: from [98.139.221.51] by tm12.access.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Aug 2013 23:34:27 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp104.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 18 Aug 2013 23:34:27 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bellsouth.net; s=s1024; t=1376868867; bh=mrw6S+/0RSn7H8QPH9W3oxRU+wguj72gMPGCSnmCVFs=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:Message-ID:Date:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-Rocket-Received:From:To:Subject; b=IFPpdi+8KFaV+YkuMdHS5aSsLyqVjGvFMxMFe6rzsEd4g2Bo2xFvNSuUM7pAU37AA8vqhM3EPqq8GVYKPFJHsuahD/fNTZ/SiYrhwvxQMq1CAdW7ol1WS3F0oaXHe02aD2075S8tViVduGhIDKgIIXP8OxlTd0HL31bFlAZGbB4= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 375619.38258.bm@smtp104.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com Message-ID: <375619.38258.bm@smtp104.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 16:34:27 -0700 (PDT) X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: s69BzRQVM1mgYM1FvevTQwVOnHw1fqqB3UYu77rNJ_EFLR2 c7yeg3cGd1HOtqwJkeMO7mCQiuULzmwfu5gUPwL8hwYQVRd.4UtmFls1mq_k xF5_lNMwGMX5PkZVFIvBDztvmumBd1tbuJZrcO2k7vj9pLTGSCUqB_Ut_tu1 U4mUfANlOJZ5tSEYmczgZw3DsLWTT4ra4hHrrkTFo4kQ2AdSW6GHAiLVWt3y 9P777wf6tsq3vNIcKJHmPThbikyJT3najPJbGDSJNW9s5fROWdcXnTzF5g5w _yKBLTZPHpVon6cmbuJRj6w9rr9v2a1GImXNQ2OjLGqaHAz9MwFjSHogrHgv 6E3oQzQj9UC0hJaNFnWAekjE.QUoVRC.EiByx9PjSln6KPapqHv06xlr9lat Heax9bC6Ux4p4ppNKJrDZD8EDL_39bA8ZT6jVY7kSlweIEYPPmj1Yg3Jlsx9 5jmv8LNIgv17sCAfa37cGt55NKieIjFQUUtOKkg0J3Z7jz3.r4tUpdpj2mA6 bcfYxml1fqO4DJNlBPUarRQupc4TYUIHOkUR0TjickralZFZ2xmXQcHDZW5N VPHKMneG0a7h9hEqbi9US9hgVBBiRmZ4UNe2ofgPaIwo9NJ62IJOnOsB_6mp SVrkHf1.BeKLmM6spsmA9BA-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: Kz_aW1.swBBYof3zAD7.RWzXz9ZAQVDMml1VADsbgPT4Kq79LC0- X-Rocket-Received: from localhost (mueller6724@74.130.200.176 with plain) by smtp104.sbc.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 18 Aug 2013 16:34:27 -0700 PDT From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: RE: Pre-sales question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 23:37:05 -0000 I would like to know if your freebsd OS 9.1 suite on CD(DVD) can be installed, and then run, on a Dell Inspiron 531S? I looked-over your website, and did +not see a citation for that specific PC (though I did see it for others). > For your reference, my PC has a AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual core processor 3800+ 2.01 GHz. The operating system on it right now (Vista) is 32-bit. The PC can > have up to 4GB of RAM. I have a 80GB Hard drive on it right now. I would like to "hitch" it to the PC using a USB cable. > If version 9.1 does run on that machine, then I may order a copy for myself. > Glen Peterson > Cedarburg, WI. > PetersonTR@aol.com You can go to ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD and download iso files for FreeBSD amd64 and i386. You can download FreeBSD 9.1 or the newest release candidate for 9.2 (now RC2) and install from CD or DVD. Is that 80GB hard drive currently in the PC? Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 19 01:28:28 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 666E229C for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 01:28:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john@potato.growveg.org) Received: from potato.growveg.org (growveg-1-pt.tunnel.tserv11.ams1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f14:3d2::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B60027D6 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 01:28:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from john by potato.growveg.org with local (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1VBEGf-0000dS-A0 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 02:28:25 +0100 Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 02:28:25 +0100 From: John To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: freebsd 9.2 via svn Message-ID: <20130819012825.GA2420@potato.growveg.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: John X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john@potato.growveg.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on potato.growveg.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 01:28:28 -0000 Hello list, Is it "safe" to start using 9.2 in the svn repos? I have a line like this in a daily crontab: svn co svn://svn.us-east.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.1 /usr/src Can I change that 9.1 to 9.2 now, or should I wait? I aim to follow 9.2-R with security updates. thanks, -- John From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 19 02:17:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9804BC89 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 02:17:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CE092A5D for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 02:17:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-92-43.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.92.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A6D73C765; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 04:17:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r7J2H27J005502; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 04:17:02 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 04:17:02 +0200 From: Polytropon To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd 9.2 via svn Message-Id: <20130819041702.d9f1ce38.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20130819012825.GA2420@potato.growveg.org> References: <20130819012825.GA2420@potato.growveg.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: John X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 02:17:11 -0000 On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 02:28:25 +0100, John wrote: > Is it "safe" to start using 9.2 in the svn repos? I have a line like > this in a daily crontab: > > svn co svn://svn.us-east.freebsd.org/base/releng/9.1 /usr/src > > Can I change that 9.1 to 9.2 now, or should I wait? I aim to follow > 9.2-R with security updates. 9.2-RELEASE hasn't been released yet. :-) http://www.freebsd.org/releases/9.2R/schedule.html If you don't use a custom kernel, why not use freebsd-update and follow the 9.2-RELEASE path with the security updates? -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 19 03:22:18 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37C4C557 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 03:22:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john@potato.growveg.org) Received: from potato.growveg.org (growveg-1-pt.tunnel.tserv11.ams1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f14:3d2::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E98342DA7 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 03:22:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from john by potato.growveg.org with local (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1VBG2p-00015f-Du for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 04:22:15 +0100 Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 04:22:15 +0100 From: John To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd 9.2 via svn Message-ID: <20130819032215.GA2464@potato.growveg.org> References: <20130819012825.GA2420@potato.growveg.org> <20130819041702.d9f1ce38.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130819041702.d9f1ce38.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: John X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john@potato.growveg.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on potato.growveg.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-lists@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 03:22:18 -0000 On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 04:17:02AM +0200, Polytropon wrote: > 9.2-RELEASE hasn't been released yet. :-) well yes, there is that I suppose ;) > If you don't use a custom kernel, why not use freebsd-update > and follow the 9.2-RELEASE path with the security updates? Not sure if this is logic or "religon", but freebsd-update makes me nervous. I'm allergic to automatic anything unless I've written it. The only times I've run generic is when installing a new system, to see what I need and what I don't. Maybe I'm just old. thanks for the input, -- John From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 19 03:22:18 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37C4C557 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 03:22:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from john@potato.growveg.org) Received: from potato.growveg.org (growveg-1-pt.tunnel.tserv11.ams1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f14:3d2::2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E98342DA7 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 03:22:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from john by potato.growveg.org with local (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1VBG2p-00015f-Du for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 04:22:15 +0100 Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 04:22:15 +0100 From: John To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd 9.2 via svn Message-ID: <20130819032215.GA2464@potato.growveg.org> References: <20130819012825.GA2420@potato.growveg.org> <20130819041702.d9f1ce38.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130819041702.d9f1ce38.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: John X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: john@potato.growveg.org X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on potato.growveg.org); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-lists@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 03:22:18 -0000 On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 04:17:02AM +0200, Polytropon wrote: > 9.2-RELEASE hasn't been released yet. :-) well yes, there is that I suppose ;) > If you don't use a custom kernel, why not use freebsd-update > and follow the 9.2-RELEASE path with the security updates? Not sure if this is logic or "religon", but freebsd-update makes me nervous. I'm allergic to automatic anything unless I've written it. The only times I've run generic is when installing a new system, to see what I need and what I don't. Maybe I'm just old. thanks for the input, -- John From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 19 03:31:18 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 094BD729 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 03:31:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0C7E2E13 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 03:31:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-92-43.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.92.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B0D9B3C7A4; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 05:31:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r7J3V7Qv005995; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 05:31:07 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 05:31:07 +0200 From: Polytropon To: freebsd-lists@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd 9.2 via svn Message-Id: <20130819053107.511189ba.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <20130819032215.GA2464@potato.growveg.org> References: <20130819012825.GA2420@potato.growveg.org> <20130819041702.d9f1ce38.freebsd@edvax.de> <20130819032215.GA2464@potato.growveg.org> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: John , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 03:31:18 -0000 On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 04:22:15 +0100, John wrote: > > If you don't use a custom kernel, why not use freebsd-update > > and follow the 9.2-RELEASE path with the security updates? > > Not sure if this is logic or "religon", but freebsd-update makes me > nervous. I'm allergic to automatic anything unless I've written it. The only > times I've run generic is when installing a new system, to see what I > need and what I don't. Maybe I'm just old. You demonstrated a valid argument for building from source. Using freebsd-update, a binary method is used for updating the _default_ system and the GENERIC kernel. If you have custom settings and therefore _intend_ to build from source, changing the version in your "svn co" command to the new -RELEASE-pX branch (security update branch) is safe. I've been using a similar approach with CVS to follow the -STABLE branch with a custom kernel and custom settings for building the system. If this makes me old, I should deserve several birthday parties per year. ;-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 19 06:07:06 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 489B7EBA for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 06:07:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vagabond@blackfoot.net) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 634962453 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 06:07:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id r7J66Pdo070658 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 00:06:39 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from vagabond@blackfoot.net) Message-ID: <5211B5E1.6040000@blackfoot.net> Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 00:06:25 -0600 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130730 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: ipfw confusion Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Mon, 19 Aug 2013 00:06:39 -0600 (MDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 06:07:06 -0000 I'm having some weird ipfw behavior, or it seems weird to me, and am looking for an explaination and then a way out. ipfw list ... 21109 allow tcp from any to 12.32.44.142 dst-port 53 in via tun0 setup keep-state 21129 allow tcp from any to 12.32.36.65 dst-port 53 in via tun0 setup keep-state ... 65534 deny log logamount 5 ip from any to any tail -f messages Aug 18 23:33:06 nightmare named[914]: client 188.231.152.46#63877: error sending response: permission denied 12.32.36.65 is the addr of the internal interface (xl0) on the firewall and is the public dns server. 12.32.44.142 is the addr of the external interface (tun0) which is bridged on a dsl line. It appears that a dns request was allowed in, but the response was not allowed back out. It seems to me the above rules 21109 and 21129 should have allowed the request in and the response back out. It's possible a request could come in on 12.32.44.142, which is why 21109 is present; although I know I am getting failures to reply to refresh requests from a secondary addressed to 12.32.36.65 What am I missing? Is there a problem if the incoming rule is for tun0, which gets passed to named since 12.32.44.142 is on the physical machine running named, but named pumps its response out on 12.32.36.65, relying on routing to get it to the right place, and that fails to match the state tracking mechanism which started with 12.32.44.142? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 19 06:36:40 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E910834A for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 06:36:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cscoman@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-x235.google.com (mail-vb0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c02::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9F212597 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 06:36:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vb0-f53.google.com with SMTP id i3so2884119vbh.40 for ; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 23:36:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=nGxpGMSQO01oZcQ5OFMjf5UjzpBcuYP0nkFvpWoTrmg=; b=pFG3m5Vt65o+LtDXe3jRT2K7xs0jwXTXTbsbnu3bUswOVp5hOSJRsFcKXdPDSgnszL zY/BdtqWYtwqsSSArf8fUGveyqmNZLkGs50KQE9oxbKYvkTi17jAbFR+J8PLEYiJVyV2 fGPp4ZkbGtlUsACGgo8TIycDfAYm4eqYnDA4p0Qmx87hRpuD40SCMUYD9fIUqtlWAYRk c4MMHD89zSFYeC1JtK0o9ZN9Qd3UhJY2sizrx5IL4v5hio/fQWT+KEpBT3O30ygphBxy nsRB+jgucxtIOER+NLhjQ19qfTvPKieVqPwc27IrYRmhbbcleQDnxhOxgqXZsGBr5uyz KQTQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.58.217.167 with SMTP id oz7mr11955254vec.15.1376894198723; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 23:36:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.163.39 with HTTP; Sun, 18 Aug 2013 23:36:38 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5211B5E1.6040000@blackfoot.net> References: <5211B5E1.6040000@blackfoot.net> Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2013 23:36:38 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ipfw confusion From: Jason Cox To: Gary Aitken Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 06:36:40 -0000 Are you sure that your DNS requests are over TCP? DNS primarily uses UDP to serve requests. TCP is used when the response data size exceeds 512 bytes (I think), or for tasks such as zone transfers. I know a few resolver implementations use TCP for all queries, but most I have used not. You might want to add rules to allow UDP as well. On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Gary Aitken wrote: > I'm having some weird ipfw behavior, or it seems weird to me, and am > looking > for an explaination and then a way out. > > ipfw list > ... > 21109 allow tcp from any to 12.32.44.142 dst-port 53 in via tun0 setup > keep-state > 21129 allow tcp from any to 12.32.36.65 dst-port 53 in via tun0 setup > keep-state > ... > 65534 deny log logamount 5 ip from any to any > > tail -f messages > Aug 18 23:33:06 nightmare named[914]: client 188.231.152.46#63877: error > sending response: permission denied > > 12.32.36.65 is the addr of the internal interface (xl0) on the firewall > and is the public dns server. > 12.32.44.142 is the addr of the external interface (tun0) which is bridged > on a > dsl line. > > It appears that a dns request was allowed in, but the response was not > allowed > back out. It seems to me the above rules 21109 and 21129 should have > allowed > the request in and the response back out. > > It's possible a request could come in on 12.32.44.142, > which is why 21109 is present; > although I know I am getting failures to reply to refresh requests > from a secondary addressed to 12.32.36.65 > > What am I missing? > > Is there a problem if the incoming rule is for tun0, > which gets passed to named > since 12.32.44.142 is on the physical machine running named, > but named pumps its response out on 12.32.36.65, > relying on routing to get it to the right place, > and that fails to match the state tracking mechanism > which started with 12.32.44.142? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Jason Cox From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 19 09:35:49 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66917428 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 09:35:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from benlaurie@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qe0-x234.google.com (mail-qe0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c02::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B7812EBF for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 09:35:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qe0-f52.google.com with SMTP id a11so1551308qen.39 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 02:35:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=3yEVZ0DI8bzshGqyMcsVRn/w2nfqS39Td1BndsNSSXU=; b=kaE4yKp+a9o43d6WKXPLMKSxeYwWnSDf55cYQ+5S1bYFz+e9krIXt9+cPuai4AbGW+ qtkWP7cXYt8J79YPfJy/ndSBtWu45191qgTRbzNnKA0XWaU2PS0X5CLw8lMz5ofydGRh 2olKS5f1nGTz22IAoMziyE8nrvLnCds0/Vr9Lamf51uKp8RDgsyiuUcWTBoLYtcRHnHQ 7QHFjxWZWk2RzkETr+wViMef/D3uq8vYl8UjxVnVUKrsPtNPp1hxR1Ek6TwNg0JT32Di WkieaeOmOroVSdtlTgiGNnDAOgLvAtXQHul+2TCa3bFM5+KSjHihRlQEDSAr9W7dWxGb BOkQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.4.2 with SMTP id 2mr13979735qap.55.1376904948376; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 02:35:48 -0700 (PDT) Sender: benlaurie@gmail.com Received: by 10.49.4.70 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 02:35:48 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 05:35:48 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Xoc5te8txg0n2jpQJKwbcshTRCQ Message-ID: Subject: Why does CD ripping fail? From: Ben Laurie To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 09:35:49 -0000 Using grip, trying to rip a CD, I get: (cd0:ahcich3:0:0:0): MODE_SENSE(6) failed, increasing minimum CDB size to 10 bytes (cd0:ahcich3:0:0:0): MODE SENSE(10). CDB: 5a 0 e 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 (cd0:ahcich3:0:0:0): CAM status: SCSI Status Error (cd0:ahcich3:0:0:0): SCSI status: Check Condition (cd0:ahcich3:0:0:0): SCSI sense: ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:24,0 (Invalid field in CDB) (cd0:ahcich3:0:0:0): Command byte 2 is invalid and no audio data is ripped. Unsure what changed, because this used to work, which is a little frustrating. I think I updated ports since it last worked. TOC works, btw. Running 9.0-RELEASE. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 19 12:32:38 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECEBD520; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 12:32:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Received: from sola.nimnet.asn.au (paqi.nimnet.asn.au [115.70.110.159]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 491CB2B6F; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 12:32:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sola.nimnet.asn.au (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r7JCWXK4034912; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 22:32:34 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from smithi@nimnet.asn.au) Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 22:32:33 +1000 (EST) From: Ian Smith To: vermaden Subject: Re: FreeBSD on ThinkPad W530 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <20130819215132.G85171@sola.nimnet.asn.au> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Cc: Adrian Chadd , FreeBSD Questions , freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 12:32:38 -0000 On Wed, 14 Aug 2013 15:40:58 +0200, vermaden wrote: > Hi and thanks for reply ;) > > > Yay another FreeBSD laptop user! > > I use FreeBSD for dekstop/workstation for I do not remember how long: > http://vermaden.deviantart.com/art/CorporateBSD-FreeBSD-at-Work-190680188 > > > Please do this: > > * join the freebsd-mobile list;* create PRs for each of your problems with -10 above!; > > Here are created PRs: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=181281 > stack trace after successfull 'umount /mnt' (SDHC card mounted as msdosfs) > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=181282 > 3h of work on battery on FreeBSD while 10h on Windows Hi; I'm only going to address this one, so chopping mercilessly .. > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=181283 > acpi_ibm module is useless on ThinkPad W530 > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=181285 > x11/xorg does not start if Nvidia Optimus is enabled on > > > * the power utilisation thing is going to be fun to track down - what kind of > > CPU is in there? Is it a recent Intel? I'm playing around with their tools at the > > moment; maybe we can look at the power the CPU is consuming and then > > add on the power from each of the other parts in your laptop until we > > figure out what's drawing said power Can't fault the comprensiveness of your PR 181282 :) I did notice: dev.cpu.0.cx_lowest: C1 As a starting point, try following mav@'s excellent Tuning Power guide: https://wiki.freebsd.org/TuningPowerConsumption I don't know what the i7 or your BIOS does about C-states, but using C2 and especially if you can get to C3 or equivalent could give a big win; with other tunings Alexander managed to double battery life (on a C2D) You said powerd was 'working' but without indication of effectiveness, such as what CPU speeds correspond to idle/light load/full load etc? You may want to try tuning its default modes/idle/busy settings, and measure real power used at different freqs. I suggest trying the advice there to disable p4tcc and acpi_throttle, reducing number of P-states considerably. Then 'service powerd stop', run powerd -v in a console and measure power consumption at various loads and CPU frequencies. If you have no wattmeter, acpiconf -i0 may serve as a guide (though you do have to wait a while for changes to be reflected); for such monitoring (albeit with working acpi_ibm) I use: smithi on t23% cat ~/bin/t23stat #!/bin/sh echo -n "`date` " sysctl dev.cpu.0.freq dev.cpu.0.cx_usage sysctl dev.acpi_ibm | egrep 'fan_|thermal' sysctl hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.temperature acpiconf -i0 | egrep 'State|Remain|Present|Volt' smithi on t23% t23stat Mon Aug 19 22:09:15 EST 2013 dev.cpu.0.freq: 733 dev.cpu.0.cx_usage: 0.05% 99.94% 0.00% last 529us dev.acpi_ibm.0.fan_speed: 2254 dev.acpi_ibm.0.fan_level: 1 dev.acpi_ibm.0.thermal: 47 46 42 -1 -1 -1 29 -1 hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.temperature: 47.0C State: discharging Remaining capacity: 95% Remaining time: 2:36 Present rate: 17313 mW Present voltage: 12236 mV Cheers, Ian From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 19 13:15:22 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 261C2792 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 13:15:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kudzu@tenebras.com) Received: from mail-oa0-f46.google.com (mail-oa0-f46.google.com [209.85.219.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E53B42DB1 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 13:15:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id l10so951919oag.19 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 06:15:20 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=Dhh8dB4koXLcxb1XeIRRvFzqXhuF3fT0/EWg/R6MfoQ=; b=mCUVrhonK0XtSOSHjqPLSqeKXAaRRn9c8m6g3CnixJhGudPFN9D8M5oA1AYomlnpxy WwuErKrqVCA+e1YIcE5VwanYhVQT0ZBu5JLXWn6rvb4gkwB7DuC3wNTtuXYX04A9nMXF aSWcUrl5ydyYWOmyBBrA/CPUxP/XP5IhuGhTQXzZTNlHZ4TnKKL2acfn2+zI7NVXDPtJ d5lLq1FRq/d6qgavzdPbbD44RziTzO0SgG5KgKpd/GOjkCqbhFS+Ho1/8E5P92njIKIM l83EEamtyQG/np+7pmlVun4x485BPYP66SvgJd1/CwLx1KazZsu9iKk/7KAib4FURoxt XTrw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnh7PQ/0xWtrn/I5ci6NGmr/Z4kIt1bhKkhPYScA0VPg9BqdMA07GRJEc06HA5nGjSs9SmE MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.144.230 with SMTP id sp6mr320070oeb.102.1376918120736; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 06:15:20 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.60.21.69 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 06:15:20 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <52111D47.1060903@webrz.net> References: <52111D47.1060903@webrz.net> Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 09:15:20 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ipfw gateway rerouting From: Michael Sierchio To: Jos Chrispijn Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 13:15:22 -0000 # my kernel has # options ROUTETABLES=16 GATEWAY_0="10.3.255.0" GATEWAY_1="10.3.255.1" setfib 0 route add default $GATEWAY_0 setfib 1 route add default $GATEWAY_1 ipfw table 1 add $NET_0 0 ipfw table 1 add $NET_1 0 ipfw table 1 add $NET_2 1 ipfw table 1 add $NET_3 0 ipfw add 00500 setfib tablearg ip from any to any in lookup src-ip 1 rule 500 will cause traffic from NET_2 to go out a different gateway (if it's not destined for a local net - presumably other rules will handle those cases) # man setfib # man ipfw (see the section on the setfib action) On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 3:15 PM, Jos Chrispijn wrote: > Can someone please hint me to to good explanatory site that explains how > to reroute a network server to different/non standard network gateway(s) > with ipfw? > > thanks, > Jos Chrispijn > ______________________________**_________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/**mailman/listinfo/freebsd-**questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-** > unsubscribe@freebsd.org " > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 19 13:15:58 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AC7B839 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 13:15:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsdlisten@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ee0-x236.google.com (mail-ee0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c00::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A33342DC6 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 13:15:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f54.google.com with SMTP id e53so2174566eek.13 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 06:15:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5UIFFfcCo2TS9ItIqxcGCeWwdDh5UiMpOd6HFkiv/VI=; b=jcsxekECNwSp7tz/xLOnfZp90qWzncnF2FF/prEMQcIQY3wP6P1IKNYGaJ5/uwraYO DjBd4o6q8M6RAhvkmCygpIMagOAboyVOBtqKG5usBzcvYVUtZpMsRVlzwsf2QsMqqCCA RhNSSHEFgYiZLl1BinDAO19528LvMEnAtQBlAA6gDvmoBdiwdZ2IfB5itujzeaWNvfkE Kacsr+N7z2PHOmMEBxWWpJ/MlCBfI//RtWDzE5/MfsQgXyVU6oDBRPTi5YoqN7Phb6Fd 0foZGLGLJjo9nX/VQXBwkYU3wZ7xOgx7PzT6dbu5NfilQXiywxdk4zxL4Nm6YId3+aij PPPA== X-Received: by 10.15.107.74 with SMTP id ca50mr441120eeb.72.1376918155876; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 06:15:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from debianlap.localdom.ain ([89.47.83.116]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id bq1sm17395994eeb.9.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 19 Aug 2013 06:15:55 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 16:15:47 +0300 From: Rares Aioanei To: Ben Laurie Subject: Re: Why does CD ripping fail? Message-ID: <20130819161547.183f906b@debianlap.localdom.ain> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.20; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 13:15:58 -0000 On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 05:35:48 -0400 Ben Laurie wrote: > Using grip, trying to rip a CD, I get: > > (cd0:ahcich3:0:0:0): MODE_SENSE(6) failed, increasing minimum CDB > size to 10 bytes > (cd0:ahcich3:0:0:0): MODE SENSE(10). CDB: 5a 0 e 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 > (cd0:ahcich3:0:0:0): CAM status: SCSI Status Error > (cd0:ahcich3:0:0:0): SCSI status: Check Condition > (cd0:ahcich3:0:0:0): SCSI sense: ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:24,0 (Invalid > field in CDB) > (cd0:ahcich3:0:0:0): Command byte 2 is invalid > > and no audio data is ripped. Unsure what changed, because this used to > work, which is a little frustrating. I think I updated ports since it > last worked. Those usually indicate hardware issues. I'd start by checking connectors, cables and the like and go on from there. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 19 13:55:20 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B6418ED for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 13:55:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from juris.kaminskis@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-x22d.google.com (mail-wg0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12FBD2FFC for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 13:55:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f45.google.com with SMTP id x12so3638870wgg.24 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 06:55:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=kT2oHC401jcBMAZcX9eNq5gZ/xuaTqNbjCkoQVT0zsc=; b=0qL71WbVHr2sj84oJC0v752AGcM6vMU7PlXT1tNfiUp1VjBlJzBUc0jPZzt+oYi7Cw PuhLqQV/Lr7l0hPQ1vErBv+td81GnvGbzXLxgY2SU71Qjut/ivwdCzL6bSuSq1pQM7Yx ccvSblAAOwyh/IfdxlZRd+xMrgkB7EJnSQqGqRJ3Gg2qAvx+GEV7FlzIvcwG5t0a5qXB lotpx+H4xTL9jZcQG8j73mWbgEFUC3jAMubm9W3iDBg7+FVgmWp9TBLdfswx+Qn//VgO d+jnYJMlsBUcuH5XkBhg9PvpHkU5nuPYqSvQSHQ51QUsMUUUdfUzPWzp5LOkMdUZD5yH IhIw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.95.10 with SMTP id dg10mr2470278wjb.36.1376920518264; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 06:55:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.83.225 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 06:55:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 16:55:18 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Setup HP Laserjet 1120m over network with LPD From: Juris Kaminskis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 13:55:20 -0000 ok I realised the problem was that i sent plain text to filter instead a postscript. when I run now: lpr test.ps no error messages appear anymore except that in the /var/spool/hp which is my spooling directory in the status file I have Sending to 192.168.1.105 and printer is silent > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 19 14:12:12 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6F6DFCB for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 14:12:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from benlaurie@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qe0-x22c.google.com (mail-qe0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c02::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68D492136 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 14:12:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qe0-f44.google.com with SMTP id 3so599564qeb.3 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 07:12:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=oIoxWzu5PGBYzFfYClT/jzIqbjNZVqKE4umyHg+lnxY=; b=YCB7dI4CSupkYrMjwItks0JsmLmxyCajaDV9dtPI5NMsYJUcpbRBx7UZF4oSgaR2Kl 8NZHAwzoRrJNnnV5F5GLoT2dATRs0Fctg49STUovGWUHCZ6q+iAhiFtZ8n3ei2dbi5TB 0bsPveD2NY4Sm1r8VpVZaRWJa3/nsnNmZVvc0QGrmi8dQgErJwZ0vsaRp0FT3cmttxwf U7qMphaUGaLd5keW3WoZpMjtINP95ByYZckROe3Fyx/RTKu0PRVto2G8H3I7wh83/GVE QmnxYJpsqgRRHd2fbig2A4Y5eAx3O6A5X3BHSPxX9zIQwAse4bK8Tzz9Fc182kWo+eeu 5e2g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.49.15.66 with SMTP id v2mr3910646qec.73.1376921531467; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 07:12:11 -0700 (PDT) Sender: benlaurie@gmail.com Received: by 10.49.4.70 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 07:12:11 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130819161547.183f906b@debianlap.localdom.ain> References: <20130819161547.183f906b@debianlap.localdom.ain> Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:12:11 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: I8VX60qz59XnX1D1pIq80g0nEI8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Why does CD ripping fail? From: Ben Laurie To: Rares Aioanei Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 14:12:12 -0000 On 19 August 2013 09:15, Rares Aioanei wrote: > On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 05:35:48 -0400 > Ben Laurie wrote: > > > Using grip, trying to rip a CD, I get: > > > > (cd0:ahcich3:0:0:0): MODE_SENSE(6) failed, increasing minimum CDB > > size to 10 bytes > > (cd0:ahcich3:0:0:0): MODE SENSE(10). CDB: 5a 0 e 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 > > (cd0:ahcich3:0:0:0): CAM status: SCSI Status Error > > (cd0:ahcich3:0:0:0): SCSI status: Check Condition > > (cd0:ahcich3:0:0:0): SCSI sense: ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:24,0 (Invalid > > field in CDB) > > (cd0:ahcich3:0:0:0): Command byte 2 is invalid > > > > and no audio data is ripped. Unsure what changed, because this used to > > work, which is a little frustrating. I think I updated ports since it > > last worked. > > Those usually indicate hardware issues. I'd start by checking > connectors, cables and the like and go on from there. > Even though I get the TOC? This seems a little unlikely... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 19 15:13:31 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E72A47A7 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 15:13:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mwlucas@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org) Received: from bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (mwlucas-2-pt.tunnel.tserv9.chi1.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f10:b9c::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FAAC24D3 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 15:13:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r7JFDTnD033270 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 11:13:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mwlucas@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org) Received: (from mwlucas@localhost) by bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id r7JFDTJ8033269 for questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 11:13:29 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from mwlucas) Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 11:13:29 -0400 From: "Michael W. Lucas" To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pkgng problem Message-ID: <20130819151329.GA33232@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> References: <20130816124343.GA21009@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> <20130816150234.GA21428@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> <20130816162329.GA21650@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130816162329.GA21650@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org [127.0.0.1]); Mon, 19 Aug 2013 11:13:30 -0400 (EDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 15:13:32 -0000 For the archives: I left the problem alone for a few days, with no changes on my side. Came back Monday. Tried again. Everything worked on the affected machines. ==ml -- Michael W. Lucas - mwlucas@michaelwlucas.com, Twitter @mwlauthor http://www.MichaelWLucas.com/, http://blather.MichaelWLucas.com/ Absolute OpenBSD 2/e - http://www.nostarch.com/openbsd2e coupon code "ILUVMICHAEL" gets you 30% off & helps me. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 19 16:31:38 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA31CF6F for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 16:31:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grammarjenn@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-x22a.google.com (mail-ob0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 987DB296A for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 16:31:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f170.google.com with SMTP id eh20so5836403obb.1 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 09:31:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=B3dA4dFrVDbKmMDz9rHcS7Z9LOMJm9bB4qDfZQ0GH04=; b=tr3IG/8WoGOntUdQyh/BeQCXl26CAePdf087rLLWKcMUqGrq+b0R6OrFwTOGYmP8l8 f38TbkaWM2DUT3/o+k6mid8J080s1StrzxeD2TcA47PD8eQUM5Vh67ECFoyS7n9YEQV6 0BDxWuaJMGiltG9NForLVy9j1+QPrON2nn3TgXR1Y/jO5WqQysTWH/iKvJ0cFRLofNfE zpM4gSrvNUgFwAasapfhNSm2jNcTWa56echbubVi9hWJ5di5hEYPCCPLDelPMmH/B28y pe4dBbE6tnkIInp3S2MWmpCjwjjsd7yQAntogxPi1GjYcd5NJpcaS3ePf5WXT9twPrqQ 3hKw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.66.229 with SMTP id i5mr1939203obt.88.1376929897875; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 09:31:37 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.182.48.66 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 09:31:37 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 00:31:37 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Addition? From: Jenny Frost To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 16:31:38 -0000 Hi there, Cheeky me!? I came across your page with grammar exercises at http://web008.pavilion.net/fr/gallery/npgallery.html and wondered if you might be interested in mentioning my grammar checker? It's located here: http://www.grammarcheck.net/ It's totally free, checks for grammar and spelling mistakes, and gives instant feedback. Please have a look at it before you decide. That would be awesome. Thanks! Best wishes, Jenny Jennifer Frost GrammarCheck.net From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 19 17:41:26 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6134CC03 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 17:41:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 360052D71 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 17:41:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.43]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3FBE24035 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 13:41:22 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 19 Aug 2013 13:41:23 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:references :subject:date; s=smtpout; bh=ZNrLVk6GpQ4pVbY8masU7em7MZA=; b=WaJ 58sPp2mrBnnw71MBHIU7KX4s0GPfiOQ5uWCDBvaG++ERl/CjQZEjxp2LYH3tIU9Q m1k+I8ivzT7MH3KGB1A8GipDLHxFfkdn/CPCJTusnqd5C3dv6L72S9ulbnF17/9z ORKubR9OdsVTlTSeXYy9Cf7KE7g7EyMdNzRdAGgU= Received: by web3.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id A63D4B0238B; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 13:41:22 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1376934082.25499.11612497.1C73C726@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: jmv5lNbgqWrtvdYwora2LA596iqzwrXGvKTdQevu+Mfd 1376934082 From: Mark Felder To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-3ac28d5b In-Reply-To: <20130816064612.GH1190@petole.demisel.net> References: <7E7AEB5A-7102-424E-8B1E-A33E0A2C8B2C@gmail.com> <20130816064612.GH1190@petole.demisel.net> Subject: Re: copying milllions of small files and millions of dirs Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 12:41:22 -0500 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 17:41:26 -0000 On Fri, Aug 16, 2013, at 1:46, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote: > On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:13:25AM -0700, aurfalien wrote: > > Is there a faster way to copy files over NFS? > > I would use find+cpio. This handles hard links, permissions, and in case > of later runs, will not copy files if they already exist on the > destination. > > # cd /source/dir > # find . | cpio -pvdm /destination/dir > I always found sysutils/cpdup to be faster than rsync. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 19 17:52:57 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BE841A7; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 17:52:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aurfalien@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-x233.google.com (mail-pa0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F9A62E50; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 17:52:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f51.google.com with SMTP id lf1so4846113pab.24 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:52:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=JlTP/QWFIrFYlG2E67gvPcE3O1pQ88/ZXVw7vAcRo64=; b=gYDJ+kDtJ6dGcgtiZZx8cmIUlx8mj6ftRFWRetkjMpxIAMBS+mX8eOVWAOxSQsaEVd a9OpHOlDqC+tof6olQ+WZt39kVPC3opFUzevhEyDg+sSxJ94Zn2EjJQPu1h6X6V0Kf6n G6obLtCzO4isH567TVabkeL3vBBVOpxfuU68PZKrpUDxy9ZCGBwMmn4j9ZMUh3VR0hp9 p2i9T3KW4ppILihan5Nbg/XJJC55OORUXF7gHjjCrzTlyUGfvIdwnOh0MtWrcsGpofIC T8WuurQXqtmkcTTCxMTjT33PCJ6J0wFSa8DhczOs0ZsH8MsIJny021ySK8uNJdeuB2j2 diMQ== X-Received: by 10.66.171.13 with SMTP id aq13mr5761990pac.30.1376934776797; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:52:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from briankrusicw.logan.tv ([64.17.255.138]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id nj9sm16402056pbc.13.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:52:55 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: copying milllions of small files and millions of dirs Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: aurfalien In-Reply-To: <1376934082.25499.11612497.1C73C726@webmail.messagingengine.com> Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:52:53 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: References: <7E7AEB5A-7102-424E-8B1E-A33E0A2C8B2C@gmail.com> <20130816064612.GH1190@petole.demisel.net> <1376934082.25499.11612497.1C73C726@webmail.messagingengine.com> To: Mark Felder X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 17:52:57 -0000 On Aug 19, 2013, at 10:41 AM, Mark Felder wrote: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013, at 1:46, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:13:25AM -0700, aurfalien wrote: >>> Is there a faster way to copy files over NFS? >> >> I would use find+cpio. This handles hard links, permissions, and in case >> of later runs, will not copy files if they already exist on the >> destination. >> >> # cd /source/dir >> # find . | cpio -pvdm /destination/dir >> > > I always found sysutils/cpdup to be faster than rsync. Ah, bookmarking this one. Many thanks. - aurf From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 19 17:53:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE27C1AB for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 17:53:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from openslateproj@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ve0-x22e.google.com (mail-ve0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6ED142E52 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 17:53:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ve0-f174.google.com with SMTP id d10so3247101vea.33 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:53:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=vXNWFYv995b9FBUFZt8qrOlEoLF25TPEexJkLsLPr0s=; b=By0KD1H3eru+6/93E3fAKneDqWjjnYnPFtIjbXEAogkfFIWlx6IQTbmoQM6MHmrdfY GtDVezNMI2Q9dvGhCzritURVIqyNlipBMfAlQ6bdo1OzZb7iTaObUMLXZYMYo8PfhiV2 MJfNuxpNgLLhGuKY65p7T7+/FK87eHFkuSYSTY+CY0wpU+8BFUyp5Ktmn3DVtcODOAFM UiSMiSxP5JIA4rAOnX9OkdAE1q0Qb43cprLnJQ4l8gwqe+nOFx4oHridcyF/U/7QsugA N2UJfRZehXyavKWjU2VS0+jTKBTSj8PR6xvosxvnrndFxmlpjLEdduROWYE4dG6u4yxT Hqmg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.199.5 with SMTP id eq5mr14515815vcb.16.1376934781542; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:53:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.139.142 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 10:53:01 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5211B5E1.6040000@blackfoot.net> References: <5211B5E1.6040000@blackfoot.net> Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 07:53:01 -1000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ipfw confusion From: OpenSlate ChalkDust To: Gary Aitken Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 17:53:02 -0000 On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 8:06 PM, Gary Aitken wrote: > I'm having some weird ipfw behavior, or it seems weird to me, and am > looking > for an explaination and then a way out. > > ipfw list > ... > 21109 allow tcp from any to 12.32.44.142 dst-port 53 in via tun0 setup > keep-state > 21129 allow tcp from any to 12.32.36.65 dst-port 53 in via tun0 setup > keep-state > ... > 65534 deny log logamount 5 ip from any to any > > tail -f messages > Aug 18 23:33:06 nightmare named[914]: client 188.231.152.46#63877: error > sending response: permission denied > > 12.32.36.65 is the addr of the internal interface (xl0) on the firewall > and is the public dns server. > 12.32.44.142 is the addr of the external interface (tun0) which is bridged > on a > dsl line. > > It appears that a dns request was allowed in, but the response was not > allowed > back out. It seems to me the above rules 21109 and 21129 should have > allowed > the request in and the response back out. > > It's possible a request could come in on 12.32.44.142, > which is why 21109 is present; > although I know I am getting failures to reply to refresh requests > from a secondary addressed to 12.32.36.65 > > What am I missing? > > I think you need explict rules like nnnnn allow tcp from 12.32.44.142 to any dst-port 53 out via tun0 setup keep-state careful I'm just winging the syntax, better check the docsa for sure. -- Gary Dunn Open Slate Project http://openslate.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 19 19:36:25 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9266ABE for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 19:36:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists.dan@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qa0-x231.google.com (mail-qa0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E7C5240D for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 19:36:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id cr7so2075206qab.15 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 12:36:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=K76YgrUXldFX0qq28UnbLPmQCZzOtknl/hAk9i3pRNA=; b=eyq/OOjvd/vVXple14eiYUwrcbeI4CsDHUjilY/Xfo0ncGpWejrrE54oVGMUmdlsQt TfEK6JrJUbKwk/3EQK2BDDS4uzjKlFnFDelfRC4Ank0bA0571HdXslQq16+hYzMzzn8k u2dHnfSU68rOcjADU19bOL/VSelooPJHw6Kg4RnD6ptI2ghAdIjZhrX4qEbwaOmRw6p6 G89h2xRaGM4RBAv3L+/sd7FpiAFXFL+J1AHsMwtTCO/IwuEGZJ+3BJtNJG/DMfTxqHhM rTm/EqUcjnKEsljtHousscDWcdyqcCaSr7EbtmqjCiEuM/YfyzSkRG40aQSQI4tyZB8p Ng6Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.69.129 with SMTP id z1mr4667099qai.88.1376940984702; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 12:36:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.218.134 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 12:36:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5211B5E1.6040000@blackfoot.net> References: <5211B5E1.6040000@blackfoot.net> Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 14:36:24 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ipfw confusion From: Dan Lists To: Gary Aitken Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 19:36:25 -0000 On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 1:06 AM, Gary Aitken wrote: > > ipfw list > ... > 21109 allow tcp from any to 12.32.44.142 dst-port 53 in via tun0 setup > keep-state > 21129 allow tcp from any to 12.32.36.65 dst-port 53 in via tun0 setup > keep-state > ... > 65534 deny log logamount 5 ip from any to any > > What am I missing? > > Do you have a check-state rule earlier in your rules? 1000 check-state Dan From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 19 20:02:28 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 853505EC for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 20:02:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpielorz_lst@tdx.co.uk) Received: from mail.tdx.com (mail.tdx.com [62.13.128.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D5A225B2 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 20:02:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from study64.tdx.co.uk (study64.tdx.co.uk [62.13.130.231]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.tdx.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/) with ESMTP id r7JK2Jw1014629 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 19 Aug 2013 21:02:20 +0100 (BST) Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 21:02:22 +0100 From: Karl Pielorz To: Arthur Chance Subject: Re: jail.conf ignoring exec.fib? Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <520FA592.7010305@qeng-ho.org> References: <98486B2D79D00F0898B7C9E6@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> <520B7F0F.7020006@a1poweruser.com> <1960A5B02323B4982B4C0320@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> <520FA592.7010305@qeng-ho.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 20:02:28 -0000 --On 17 August 2013 17:32:18 +0100 Arthur Chance wrote: > What do you get in the jail from > > sysctl net.fibs > sysctl net.my_fibnum > > ? I didn't know those sysctl's existed :) If I fire up the jail, and jexec to it, and run the above - I get: " root@jail:/ # sysctl net.fibs net.fibs: 4 root@jail:/ # sysctl net.my_fibnum net.my_fibnum: 0 " (I have 'ROUTETABLES=4' in the Kernel, so the 4 above is correct). That's for a jail which has: " jail { jid = 100; exec.fib = "1"; ... " In /etc/jail.conf So, on the surface it looks like 'exec.fib' is being ignored :( I tried it without quotes as well, to no avail. -Karl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 19 21:15:29 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04EF15DF for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 21:15:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vagabond@blackfoot.net) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A36C42949 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 21:15:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id r7JLFDCT073735; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 15:15:14 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from vagabond@blackfoot.net) Message-ID: <52128AE1.8000102@blackfoot.net> Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 15:15:13 -0600 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130730 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: ipfw confusion References: <5211B5E1.6040000@blackfoot.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Mon, 19 Aug 2013 15:15:14 -0600 (MDT) Cc: lists.dan@gmail.com, OpenSlate ChalkDust X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 21:15:29 -0000 On 08/19/13 11:53, OpenSlate ChalkDust wrote: > On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 8:06 PM, Gary Aitken wrote: > >> I'm having some weird ipfw behavior, or it seems weird to me, and am >> looking >> for an explaination and then a way out. >> >> ipfw list >> ... >> 21109 allow tcp from any to 12.32.44.142 dst-port 53 in via tun0 setup >> keep-state >> 21129 allow tcp from any to 12.32.36.65 dst-port 53 in via tun0 setup >> keep-state >> ... >> 65534 deny log logamount 5 ip from any to any >> >> tail -f messages >> Aug 18 23:33:06 nightmare named[914]: client 188.231.152.46#63877: error >> sending response: permission denied >> >> 12.32.36.65 is the addr of the internal interface (xl0) on the firewall >> and is the public dns server. >> 12.32.44.142 is the addr of the external interface (tun0) which is bridged >> on a >> dsl line. >> >> It appears that a dns request was allowed in, but the response was not >> allowed >> back out. It seems to me the above rules 21109 and 21129 should have >> allowed >> the request in and the response back out. >> >> It's possible a request could come in on 12.32.44.142, >> which is why 21109 is present; >> although I know I am getting failures to reply to refresh requests >> from a secondary addressed to 12.32.36.65 >> >> What am I missing? >> >> I think you need explict rules like > > nnnnn allow tcp from 12.32.44.142 to any dst-port 53 out via tun0 setup > keep-state Why would rules like that be necessary, given the conversation is initiated from the outside? Shouldn't "setup keep-state" let the whole conversation, both directions, through? On 08/19/13 13:36, Dan Lists wrote: > Do you have a check-state rule earlier in your rules? > > 1000 check-state Yes: 00500 check-state From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 19 21:18:15 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEF386A3 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 21:18:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vagabond@blackfoot.net) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BF66296B for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 21:18:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id r7JLIDhh073739; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 15:18:13 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from vagabond@blackfoot.net) Message-ID: <52128B95.30006@blackfoot.net> Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 15:18:13 -0600 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130730 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jason Cox Subject: Re: ipfw confusion References: <5211B5E1.6040000@blackfoot.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Mon, 19 Aug 2013 15:18:13 -0600 (MDT) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 21:18:15 -0000 On 08/19/13 00:36, Jason Cox wrote: > Are you sure that your DNS requests are over TCP? DNS primarily uses UDP to > serve requests. TCP is used when the response data size exceeds 512 bytes > (I think), or for tasks such as zone transfers. I know a few resolver > implementations use TCP for all queries, but most I have used not. You > might want to add rules to allow UDP as well. There are identical rules included for udp: 21149 allow udp from any to 12.32.44.142 dst-port 53 in via tun0 keep-state 21169 allow udp from any to 12.32.36.65 dst-port 53 in via tun0 keep-state One of the requests which is being refused is a zone transfer request from a secondary which is a tcp request. Others are probably udp. > On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Gary Aitken wrote: > >> I'm having some weird ipfw behavior, or it seems weird to me, and am >> looking >> for an explaination and then a way out. >> >> ipfw list >> ... >> 21109 allow tcp from any to 12.32.44.142 dst-port 53 in via tun0 setup >> keep-state >> 21129 allow tcp from any to 12.32.36.65 dst-port 53 in via tun0 setup >> keep-state >> ... >> 65534 deny log logamount 5 ip from any to any >> >> tail -f messages >> Aug 18 23:33:06 nightmare named[914]: client 188.231.152.46#63877: error >> sending response: permission denied >> >> 12.32.36.65 is the addr of the internal interface (xl0) on the firewall >> and is the public dns server. >> 12.32.44.142 is the addr of the external interface (tun0) which is bridged >> on a >> dsl line. >> >> It appears that a dns request was allowed in, but the response was not >> allowed >> back out. It seems to me the above rules 21109 and 21129 should have >> allowed >> the request in and the response back out. >> >> It's possible a request could come in on 12.32.44.142, >> which is why 21109 is present; >> although I know I am getting failures to reply to refresh requests >> from a secondary addressed to 12.32.36.65 >> >> What am I missing? >> >> Is there a problem if the incoming rule is for tun0, >> which gets passed to named >> since 12.32.44.142 is on the physical machine running named, >> but named pumps its response out on 12.32.36.65, >> relying on routing to get it to the right place, >> and that fails to match the state tracking mechanism >> which started with 12.32.44.142? >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 19 21:42:59 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0726EE04 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 21:42:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E9A42AB3 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 21:42:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.erewhon.net (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr13.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r7JLgpuE021897; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 23:42:51 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.erewhon.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 66D8C1238C; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 23:42:51 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 23:42:51 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: Aymeric Mansoux Subject: Re: Tex Live vs. print/texlive-full (was Re: texlive and package updating) Message-ID: <20130819214251.GA45729@slackbox.erewhon.net> References: <20130809123643.1b6f7fb6@scorpio> <52051B6A.30209@tundraware.com> <5206644C.6060803@riseup.net> <5876de2d649be35ec512c92fd5f0d8c9.squirrel@kokonatsu.kuri.mu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/04w6evG8XlLl3ft" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5876de2d649be35ec512c92fd5f0d8c9.squirrel@kokonatsu.kuri.mu> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 21:42:59 -0000 --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 08:43:13AM +0200, Aymeric Mansoux wrote: > Hello, >=20 > On Sat, August 10, 2013 6:03 pm, Nikola Pavlovi=C4=87 wrote: > > On 09/08/13 18:40, Tim Daneliuk wrote: > >> I've given up on all OS distribution-based TexLive drops. I install > >> texlive manually from their installer=20 Same here. I generally don't update TeX more than once a year, which works fine for me. > >> and then run tlmgr under > >> cron control nightly to keep it up-to-date. I do this on > >> FreeBSD (my primary dev and server platform) as well as all > >> linux instances in my environment. It makes things a lot simpler. > >> > > > > How do you manage dependency tracking errors? My solution to this problem was to maintain my own patches for ports that I used that relied on TeX. These patches would point to the relevant binaries without adding dependencies. I would apply these patches after running port= snap and before running portmaster. Luckily, TeXLive pretty much has everything TeX-related you'll ever need. A= nd after switching from emacs to vim, I also don't need auctex anymore. Other ports have made TeX an optional dependency. Currently none of the ports tha= t I use require TeX. > > The last time I've > > installed it the way you do was on Slackware and since it doesn't do any > > dependency tracking there were no problems (as long as the binaries were > > in PATH). I can imagine ports and pkg tools on FreeBSD complaining > > about missing TeX packages, and AFAIK Debian based Linux distributions > > will certainly complain (I think there is a workaround, but it involves > > messing with dpkg). >=20 > I am also curious about this one. Any guideline or special considerations > regarding the use of the Tex Live distribution straight into FreeBSD would > be very helpful. Or is it just a matter of following this: > http://www.tug.org/texlive/quickinstall.html Those instructions pretty much cover what you have to do. I add the path to the TeXLive binaries in /etc/login.conf instead of in one= of the shell rc files. And since I like using TeX fonts, I added the directori= es for e.g. the tex-gyre fonts to the GS_FONTPATH environment variable, so that ghostscript can find them if necessary. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://rsmith.home.xs4all.nl/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlISkVsACgkQEnfvsMMhpyUcAwCeJx9ERGwh8scDyNItSTQfN5+b B3IAnjoDOJMf96bmhV4KIm+FO+UmkRVH =V3sc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/04w6evG8XlLl3ft-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Aug 19 22:02:58 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A821B4C2 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 22:02:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: from smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B8322BB5 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 22:02:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from slackbox.erewhon.net (slackbox.xs4all.nl [213.84.242.160]) by smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r7JM2pt6084081 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 00:02:51 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from rsmith@xs4all.nl) Received: by slackbox.erewhon.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id D418C123FB; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 00:02:50 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 00:02:50 +0200 From: Roland Smith To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: undelete files in msdosfs Message-ID: <20130819220250.GB45729@slackbox.erewhon.net> References: <20130818170039.GA1954@La-Habana> <20130818212803.72ca7724.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="1UWUbFP1cBYEclgG" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20130818212803.72ca7724.freebsd@edvax.de> X-GPG-Fingerprint: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 X-GPG-Key: http://www.xs4all.nl/~rsmith/pubkey.txt X-GPG-Notice: If this message is not signed, don't assume I sent it! User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2013 22:02:58 -0000 --1UWUbFP1cBYEclgG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 09:28:03PM +0200, Polytropon wrote: > On Sun, 18 Aug 2013 19:00:39 +0200, Matthias Apitz wrote: > > After a nice day in the fields, my wife deleted accidently the pictures > > in her cam; the microSD mounts fine in FreeBSD as -t msdosfs; do we have > > some FreeBSD 10-CUR tool to undelete the files, as there are some for M= $? > We have plenty of them. From my "unbelievable list of tools for > data recovery" and regarding that you are trying to recover files > from a camera: "photorec". It's in the ports collection. For the archives, it's in the sysutils/testdisk port.=20 (Not the first place one would look, I'd say) Nice find, BTW. One for the list of recovery tools indeed. > In the > same context, "magicrescue" is worth mentioning. If they all > fail, consider using TSK. > Note: Do _not_ do ANY writes to the card! Mount it -o ro if needed. > Make an 1:1 copy (using "dd_rescue" from ports), work with that > copy. Everything that slips through fat fingers could reduce the > chance of a successful recovery session. I know it. ;-) If you took any more pictures with the same card in the camera, it is almost guaranteed that some of the original pictures will not be recoverable becau= se they've been overwritten. Roland --=20 R.F.Smith http://rsmith.home.xs4all.nl/ [plain text _non-HTML_ PGP/GnuPG encrypted/signed email much appreciated] pgp: 1A2B 477F 9970 BA3C 2914 B7CE 1277 EFB0 C321 A725 (KeyID: C321A725) --1UWUbFP1cBYEclgG Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAlISlgoACgkQEnfvsMMhpyUiZgCgrdHIzgwXhIrTs7WfO1d1sVfs 1pEAn0wF5guwSsIA/+ZpN5KUIAnFLy0v =JEmX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --1UWUbFP1cBYEclgG-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 20 06:33:09 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4D4E1EA for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 06:33:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from amvandemore@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-x236.google.com (mail-pa0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC68E260B for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 06:33:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id kx10so327997pab.13 for ; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 23:33:09 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=GlJzuGKT4CyxLjlZajLVhgaHMmgCcc/XD2GcaG+vMsM=; b=uOctEti0nqdN33MYimfzldP+8ApbuXsHDOZDo6jnZzL4y2OsqJyTT4mqb0YCujHXbx azX1psrBq4/69xJtUNj6qZW0WQG8pz+31rDcFdkn1c905Mxe60DGu5A7tJ3FL1lCVWYb vGk/ZvP/xQPl7aXA69hPGCljo3MTY2MWEoBDiPzkhEfofpva/p9f1dpa8YVXpgfQwxwm k2NEMkQ0uOtdSklZ+u3PsvTIaG3GWa3iZYiWJB2OjnhxQhDHFJBfYCsIVJL3y3j5c0QC 0PGhtwqBg/afxKHGGi/F7U308B0Ny3mIvzSUtDJ081YHIkSjLzp3ovfpZzYnIDviyQrK UTfw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.25.205 with SMTP id e13mr849603pag.180.1376980389140; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 23:33:09 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.92.79 with HTTP; Mon, 19 Aug 2013 23:33:09 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <791847EC-8E72-4013-9157-7AD0ACB62A7D@elde.net> References: <520E5EC0.5090105@fjl.co.uk> <9FB6809B-DD5D-4A04-8BD9-0271FAC03181@elde.net> <520F53A2.80707@fjl.co.uk> <520F8AA8.8030407@fjl.co.uk> <1FF39756-0555-4CD8-95B7-862F9644CF78@elde.net> <791847EC-8E72-4013-9157-7AD0ACB62A7D@elde.net> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 01:33:09 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: VPN where local private address collide From: Adam Vande More To: Terje Elde , FreeBSD Questions , frank2@fjl.co.uk Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 06:33:09 -0000 On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 7:17 AM, Terje Elde wrote: > On 18. aug. 2013, at 02.43, Adam Vande More wrote: > > > What about SSL/TLS for example? How would the router swap the header > in an encrypted session? > > > > Same as it would any sessions since only the payload is encrypted. What > Frank calls basic nat, most people call static nat(at least people who have > read enough Cisco docs) and it works just fine. Also you are confusing > headers. > > The point I was aiming for was that even if you were to swap the IPs in > the IP-header on the gateway, some protocols still reference the IPs inside > the TCP-payload, Yes like IPSec as I mentioned. > and while you can rewrite that on a NAT-box using an application level > gateway, you can not do that if the session is using SSL or TLS. > Complete BS. > > I was referring to headers *inside* the SSL/TLS-layers. I thought that > was obvious, but I see I might not have been clear enough. > Not clear in the least. Expanding on what is so difficult about might do a lot of us some good. > > Yes, you can often still resolve it on the server, but just how messy does > one want to get stacking workaround on top of workaround, > Despite your protestations to the contrary, NAT and SIP work quite weil together in basic configurations including TLS and the OP's scenario. I can't explain your difficulties but perhaps when you aren't at a mobile device you could answer a question in depth. The server would register that the phone is available at 192.168.0.200 > (locally, in lan_b), while the server would actually need to send to > 192.168.2.200, in order to reach 192.168.0.200 in lan_a. > Exactly how this would behave depends on a lot of factors, but you'd > quickly end up with a situation in which the phone *appears* to work, can > register against the server and call out (both client-initiated), but where > incoming calls just don't work (sent to 192.168.0.200 in lan_b, rather than > in lan_a). Could you could post your config to demonstrate what you are doing incorrectly? -- Adam Vande More From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 20 07:18:50 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B59E2CEE for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 07:18:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-x22d.google.com (mail-we0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C5BE2825 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 07:18:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f173.google.com with SMTP id x54so48369wes.32 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 00:18:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=c9PuqDEk6Jg/KQxbeklzpEF078BGM8EeIrutRYB55t8=; b=SXEv8Rd4G/55kpp9H6eLUkqGPOnFbJOiHaCS0CY8aiWjYQcS3fSCXbMRxPQ/AcI3Pu KLaCDa4O5dh0pqDxoE93cBh7Hbt7esDOV33T51nIc12Thupg6ZVp06gS1c+SaYm9S1Tm 1xTzQCOEn4EhLI0dKcfOvoZ6nYo1LZMHb5Eckf6iqJa0RHlBEd6963+du9h9A9MK0W/e Oc9w9n7zfCXMcsR9UQ4niHLDv/W/lPDZTz5nq6ZLiM6FPJkKn5Xwunhhvh9O8xMy9FQb Zq5kbb28efHm8HCZSMF7vvI74eQU8vXDZvU9uUgk2XjLto1rJyLy8Uyo+sWFjyj/j9+e LidQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.173.163 with SMTP id bl3mr151292wjc.10.1376983128527; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 00:18:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.67.196 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 00:18:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130819151329.GA33232@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> References: <20130816124343.GA21009@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> <20130816150234.GA21428@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> <20130816162329.GA21650@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> <20130819151329.GA33232@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 08:18:48 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: pkgng problem From: krad To: "Michael W. Lucas" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 07:18:50 -0000 must be code unrot On 19 August 2013 16:13, Michael W. Lucas wrote: > For the archives: > > I left the problem alone for a few days, with no changes on my side. > > Came back Monday. Tried again. Everything worked on the affected > machines. > > ==ml > > -- > Michael W. Lucas - mwlucas@michaelwlucas.com, Twitter @mwlauthor > http://www.MichaelWLucas.com/, http://blather.MichaelWLucas.com/ > Absolute OpenBSD 2/e - http://www.nostarch.com/openbsd2e > coupon code "ILUVMICHAEL" gets you 30% off & helps me. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 20 07:27:27 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49D81278 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 07:27:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from blue.qeng-ho.org (blue.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D5AD328C0 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 07:27:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r7K7RHHc071022; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 08:27:17 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Message-ID: <52131A55.2040400@qeng-ho.org> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 08:27:17 +0100 From: Arthur Chance User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130810 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Karl Pielorz Subject: Re: jail.conf ignoring exec.fib? References: <98486B2D79D00F0898B7C9E6@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> <520B7F0F.7020006@a1poweruser.com> <1960A5B02323B4982B4C0320@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> <520FA592.7010305@qeng-ho.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 07:27:27 -0000 On 19/08/2013 21:02, Karl Pielorz wrote: > > > --On 17 August 2013 17:32:18 +0100 Arthur Chance > wrote: > >> What do you get in the jail from >> >> sysctl net.fibs >> sysctl net.my_fibnum >> >> ? > > I didn't know those sysctl's existed :) I only stumbled on them by doing sysctl -a | grep fib It's often surprising what you find that way. > If I fire up the jail, and jexec > to it, and run the above - I get: > > " > root@jail:/ # sysctl net.fibs > net.fibs: 4 > root@jail:/ # sysctl net.my_fibnum > net.my_fibnum: 0 > " > > (I have 'ROUTETABLES=4' in the Kernel, so the 4 above is correct). > > > That's for a jail which has: > > " > jail { > jid = 100; > exec.fib = "1"; > ... > " > > In /etc/jail.conf > > So, on the surface it looks like 'exec.fib' is being ignored :( I tried > it without quotes as well, to no avail. In the source the exec.fib parameter is given as an integer, so the quotes probably shouldn't be there, but I'm not sure whether it matters. There's definitely a setfib call in the source that's done if exec.fib exists. All I can think of right now is that you try firing up the jail using the -v verbose flag. This should show everything the jail command does as the jail is created. -- In the dungeons of Mordor, Sauron bred Orcs with LOLcats to create a new race of servants. Called Uruk-Oh-Hai in the Black Speech, they were cruel and delighted in torturing spelling and grammar. _Lord of the Rings 2.0, the Web Edition_ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 20 07:32:50 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E13724E8; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 07:32:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x236.google.com (mail-wi0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E5592927; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 07:32:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f182.google.com with SMTP id hi8so62258wib.3 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 00:32:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=rzrqHsIJRIh1/77gEkxV9DOUM5ZmfGdcDLTKoolHHuA=; b=SSZJT3IhLPCExqC/vrDmbQ9qQxBU5k9vI0A2UjFO3KK0IXfj5i6+VWlq047in+Ulcy 4bZMdKs//V9J7FRpjN+ltMLane1O+RUmCBnJJonNmnoBhspLdn+kuonkjG5rCivVoJ3M 4fOdbAHl4g8/+BhIfkMPsZYsC5lgOITNAmPFeGhvk7+k75Aks+ePRqBpIltb8Cgz5sha TRto1TtUpCOXflShDADO7iV6Np6Q6k+LBQsI+8kyHFK2o2Mg1B6hh29qIv4JQI16Qpv0 kSSVqSvoHRX+hEfLUi9+d/V6dsz/GczoGoerd9gfThsQJaM12dxVqJmoNAMk7MKqeKv9 puig== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.206.42 with SMTP id ll10mr11160108wic.50.1376983968560; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 00:32:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.67.196 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 00:32:48 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <7E7AEB5A-7102-424E-8B1E-A33E0A2C8B2C@gmail.com> <20130816064612.GH1190@petole.demisel.net> <1376934082.25499.11612497.1C73C726@webmail.messagingengine.com> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 08:32:48 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: copying milllions of small files and millions of dirs From: krad To: aurfalien Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 07:32:50 -0000 When i migrated a large mailspool in maildir format from the old nfs server to the new one in a previous job, I 1st generated a list of the top level maildirs. I then generated the rsync commands + plus a few other bits and pieces for each maildir to make a single transaction like function. I then pumped all this auto generated scripts into xjobs and ran them in parallel. This vastly speeded up the process as sequentially running the tree was far to slow. THis was for about 15 million maildirs in a hashed structure btw so a fair amount of files. eg find /maildir -type d -maxdepth 4 | while read d do r=$(($RANDOM*$RANDOM)) echo rsync -a $d/ /newpath/$d/ > /tmp/scripts/$r echo some other stuff >> /tmp/scripts/$r done ls /tmp/scripts/| while read f echo /tmp/scripts/$f done | xjobs -j 20 On 19 August 2013 18:52, aurfalien wrote: > > On Aug 19, 2013, at 10:41 AM, Mark Felder wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013, at 1:46, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:13:25AM -0700, aurfalien wrote: > >>> Is there a faster way to copy files over NFS? > >> > >> I would use find+cpio. This handles hard links, permissions, and in case > >> of later runs, will not copy files if they already exist on the > >> destination. > >> > >> # cd /source/dir > >> # find . | cpio -pvdm /destination/dir > >> > > > > I always found sysutils/cpdup to be faster than rsync. > > Ah, bookmarking this one. > > Many thanks. > > - aurf > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 20 07:34:07 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67501597; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 07:34:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kraduk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-x236.google.com (mail-we0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B620F2940; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 07:34:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f182.google.com with SMTP id q59so63441wes.13 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 00:34:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=9n5VqNlnJnRoVh34eHISHiJjFjYxpIKirD2r8y4snJY=; b=k6BqsNEGTkUoOt2olJfNkynXpsj2wNQhTYvtU4BLak4BPzCusHxb1JAPdMjRzgLztR Y3wHFGzbSpmm7oqoqzHGUNwZqFEjOHnGuj38yZzMnpsVcED54BgF//Vmi/ko0oJgZRLf Yx/r90yYcH+2QXaQhowmAhw4I+uOv2b1I032Kmq95zguhmxJv3RU/MYAEPfRvlPSlqHl 8/Ai6OQaVTEZbiCmafW+9AkcdbiP/j97bGHGwmwYw2tdDDdiiR8TrMUiBm7nZgoMFeH8 N7HRwh0m3hxCqsr9CyA4gdlDQBELAr2AvIKa/+Noz5bX4lJYOFzvY9uyl5pjhhSi7z0w ytkQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.84.225 with SMTP id c1mr11151948wiz.53.1376984045001; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 00:34:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.67.196 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 00:34:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <7E7AEB5A-7102-424E-8B1E-A33E0A2C8B2C@gmail.com> <20130816064612.GH1190@petole.demisel.net> <1376934082.25499.11612497.1C73C726@webmail.messagingengine.com> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 08:34:04 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: copying milllions of small files and millions of dirs From: krad To: aurfalien Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 07:34:07 -0000 whops that should have been ls /tmp/scripts/| while read f echo sh /tmp/scripts/$f done | xjobs -j 20 On 20 August 2013 08:32, krad wrote: > When i migrated a large mailspool in maildir format from the old nfs > server to the new one in a previous job, I 1st generated a list of the top > level maildirs. I then generated the rsync commands + plus a few other bits > and pieces for each maildir to make a single transaction like function. I > then pumped all this auto generated scripts into xjobs and ran them in > parallel. This vastly speeded up the process as sequentially running the > tree was far to slow. THis was for about 15 million maildirs in a hashed > structure btw so a fair amount of files. > > > eg > > find /maildir -type d -maxdepth 4 | while read d > do > r=$(($RANDOM*$RANDOM)) > echo rsync -a $d/ /newpath/$d/ > /tmp/scripts/$r > echo some other stuff >> /tmp/scripts/$r > done > > ls /tmp/scripts/| while read f > echo /tmp/scripts/$f > done | xjobs -j 20 > > > > > > > > > > > On 19 August 2013 18:52, aurfalien wrote: > >> >> On Aug 19, 2013, at 10:41 AM, Mark Felder wrote: >> >> > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013, at 1:46, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote: >> >> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:13:25AM -0700, aurfalien wrote: >> >>> Is there a faster way to copy files over NFS? >> >> >> >> I would use find+cpio. This handles hard links, permissions, and in >> case >> >> of later runs, will not copy files if they already exist on the >> >> destination. >> >> >> >> # cd /source/dir >> >> # find . | cpio -pvdm /destination/dir >> >> >> > >> > I always found sysutils/cpdup to be faster than rsync. >> >> Ah, bookmarking this one. >> >> Many thanks. >> >> - aurf >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> > > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 20 09:19:35 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00C05753 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 09:19:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk) Received: from bs1.fjl.org.uk (bs1.fjl.org.uk [84.45.41.196]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5AA12F64 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 09:19:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.35] (mux.fjl.org.uk [62.3.120.246]) (authenticated bits=0) by bs1.fjl.org.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r7K9JN7e094632 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 10:19:23 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk) Message-ID: <5213349B.10908@fjl.co.uk> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 10:19:23 +0100 From: Frank Leonhardt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: copying milllions of small files and millions of dirs References: <7E7AEB5A-7102-424E-8B1E-A33E0A2C8B2C@gmail.com> <20130816064612.GH1190@petole.demisel.net> <1376934082.25499.11612497.1C73C726@webmail.messagingengine.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 09:19:35 -0000 On 20/08/2013 08:32, krad wrote: > When i migrated a large mailspool in maildir format from the old nfs server > to the new one in a previous job, I 1st generated a list of the top level > maildirs. I then generated the rsync commands + plus a few other bits and > pieces for each maildir to make a single transaction like function. I then > pumped all this auto generated scripts into xjobs and ran them in parallel. > This vastly speeded up the process as sequentially running the tree was far > to slow. THis was for about 15 million maildirs in a hashed structure btw > so a fair amount of files. > > > eg > > find /maildir -type d -maxdepth 4 | while read d > do > r=$(($RANDOM*$RANDOM)) > echo rsync -a $d/ /newpath/$d/ > /tmp/scripts/$r > echo some other stuff >> /tmp/scripts/$r > done > > ls /tmp/scripts/| while read f > echo /tmp/scripts/$f > done | xjobs -j 20 > This isn't what I'd have expected, as running operations in parallel on mechanical drives would normally result in superfluous head movements and thus exacerbate the I/O bottleneck. The system must be optimising the requests from 20 parallel jobs better than I thought it would to climb out from that hole far enough to get a net benefit. Did you remember how any other approaches performed? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 20 09:27:48 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88BBC89C for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 09:27:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Received: from feeder.usenet4all.se (1-1-1-38a.far.sth.bostream.se [82.182.32.53]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA3142FE0 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 09:27:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kw.news4all.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by feeder.usenet4all.se (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id r7K8wOCY069531; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 10:58:24 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from bah@bananmonarki.se) Message-ID: <52132F6C.3090403@bananmonarki.se> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 10:57:16 +0200 From: Bernt Hansson User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130419 Thunderbird/17.0.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ben Laurie Subject: Re: Why does CD ripping fail? References: <20130819161547.183f906b@debianlap.localdom.ain> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Rares Aioanei X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 09:27:48 -0000 On 2013-08-19 16:12, Ben Laurie wrote: > On 19 August 2013 09:15, Rares Aioanei wrote: > >> On Mon, 19 Aug 2013 05:35:48 -0400 >> Ben Laurie wrote: >> >>> Using grip, trying to rip a CD, I get: >>> >>> (cd0:ahcich3:0:0:0): MODE_SENSE(6) failed, increasing minimum CDB >>> size to 10 bytes >>> (cd0:ahcich3:0:0:0): MODE SENSE(10). CDB: 5a 0 e 0 0 0 0 0 20 0 >>> (cd0:ahcich3:0:0:0): CAM status: SCSI Status Error >>> (cd0:ahcich3:0:0:0): SCSI status: Check Condition >>> (cd0:ahcich3:0:0:0): SCSI sense: ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:24,0 (Invalid >>> field in CDB) >>> (cd0:ahcich3:0:0:0): Command byte 2 is invalid >>> >>> and no audio data is ripped. Unsure what changed, because this used to >>> work, which is a little frustrating. I think I updated ports since it >>> last worked. >> >> Those usually indicate hardware issues. I'd start by checking >> connectors, cables and the like and go on from there. >> > > Even though I get the TOC? This seems a little unlikely... But none the less..... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 20 09:30:33 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D01596B for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 09:30:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from patfbsd@davenulle.org) Received: from smtp.lamaiziere.net (net.lamaiziere.net [94.23.254.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07E0B2011 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 09:30:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from roxette.lamaiziere.net (149.169.100.84.rev.sfr.net [84.100.169.149]) by smtp.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5C03DA5A2; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 11:21:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by roxette.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4E90B0B7; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 11:21:24 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 11:21:23 +0200 From: Patrick Lamaiziere To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, David Demelier Subject: Re: VirtualBox: reproductible panic Message-ID: <20130820112123.5d8e3a6e@davenulle.org> In-Reply-To: <1382064.HZhnGOCLBZ@melon> References: <1382064.HZhnGOCLBZ@melon> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 09:30:33 -0000 Le Fri, 09 Aug 2013 23:06:01 +0200, David Demelier a écrit : > Hello, > > I can reproduce a panic by just starting a virtual machine with > VirtualBox 4.2.16_2. > > Unfortunately, as the kmod driver is not built with debug symbols I > could not provide much information. Debug symbols are in option in the port (make config) It's hard to say without a bt. Regards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 20 11:19:52 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF32466 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 11:19:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ea0-x22c.google.com (mail-ea0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c01::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ACFF26B4 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 11:19:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ea0-f172.google.com with SMTP id r16so148938ead.31 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 04:19:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+4E8nxwt7mVF11E/Bwc3VwPJZWGGkeinCnI1Qe9GDDs=; b=jCNYoM0oXcCBiiUXA/gEg78+VoNIP3ZMqZR7rI+/zKnPzkC9bNSVjMZm3psy643MCu BIu2ay6LObYnHcoY6oCzhzWSoXzaK+K5N5SRFFLcvsXbt+Cs0ld8ouA6gljGUrXqPxnl ObMnDb5ZSgywrZ7ni0wc/nmqX7C6KIBBZiSWaF27TEaFTLFU9xghmf4fEAZXFEExfJ5O TSLVg3FR2yzG9uGarpv+w3nPPxi5bUrGAD66Mtxv1Or9cpFt9s9fof9LHkLluH5W04o/ tkB669OlnivT9iXJ6n0f7JOJDYFseScBeQfUkhLsVJmlX1KeE8DBxFAU4SF6tPKt2EzQ EBPg== X-Received: by 10.14.200.130 with SMTP id z2mr1642000een.14.1376997590580; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 04:19:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.10] (58.33.91.91.rev.sfr.net. [91.91.33.58]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id a43sm1692600eep.9.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Aug 2013 04:19:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <521350D0.4060100@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 13:19:44 +0200 From: David Demelier User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130819 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Patrick Lamaiziere Subject: Re: VirtualBox: reproductible panic References: <1382064.HZhnGOCLBZ@melon> <20130820112123.5d8e3a6e@davenulle.org> In-Reply-To: <20130820112123.5d8e3a6e@davenulle.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 11:19:53 -0000 On 20.08.2013 11:21, Patrick Lamaiziere wrote: > Le Fri, 09 Aug 2013 23:06:01 +0200, > David Demelier a écrit : > >> Hello, >> >> I can reproduce a panic by just starting a virtual machine with >> VirtualBox 4.2.16_2. >> >> Unfortunately, as the kmod driver is not built with debug symbols I >> could not provide much information. > > Debug symbols are in option in the port (make config) > It's hard to say without a bt. > > Regards > Yes, I finally made DEBUG symbols enabled, there is the panic backtrace: Unread portion of the kernel message buffer: Fatal trap 9: general protection fault while in kernel mode cpuid = 1; apic id = 01 instruction pointer = 0x20:0xffffffff80b7ddb5 stack pointer = 0x28:0xffffff80e7d64540 frame pointer = 0x28:0xffffff80e7d64550 code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1 processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 current process = 25056 (VirtualBox) trap number = 9 panic: general protection fault cpuid = 1 KDB: stack backtrace: #0 0xffffffff80948376 at kdb_backtrace+0x66 #1 0xffffffff8090dece at panic+0x1ce #2 0xffffffff80cf2c20 at trap_fatal+0x290 #3 0xffffffff80cf3431 at trap+0x241 #4 0xffffffff80cdc863 at calltrap+0x8 #5 0xffffffff80b7ee97 at vm_map_lookup_entry+0xb7 #6 0xffffffff80b82790 at vm_map_lookup+0x50 #7 0xffffffff80b78a6e at vm_fault_hold+0x15e #8 0xffffffff80b7b0c3 at vm_fault+0x73 #9 0xffffffff80cf2e9f at trap_pfault+0x12f #10 0xffffffff80cf36e4 at trap+0x4f4 #11 0xffffffff80cdc863 at calltrap+0x8 Uptime: 1h9m58s Dumping 459 out of 3043 MB:..4%..11%..21%..32%..42%..53%..63%..74%..81%..91% Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/if_lagg.ko...Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/if_lagg.ko.symbols...done. done. Loaded symbols for /boot/kernel/if_lagg.ko Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/if_msk.ko...Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/if_msk.ko.symbols...done. done. Loaded symbols for /boot/kernel/if_msk.ko Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/acpi_video.ko...Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/acpi_video.ko.symbols...done. done. Loaded symbols for /boot/kernel/acpi_video.ko Reading symbols from /boot/modules/vboxdrv.ko...Reading symbols from /boot/modules/vboxdrv.ko.symbols...done. done. Loaded symbols for /boot/modules/vboxdrv.ko Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/fdescfs.ko...Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/fdescfs.ko.symbols...done. done. Loaded symbols for /boot/kernel/fdescfs.ko Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/ng_ubt.ko...Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/ng_ubt.ko.symbols...done. done. Loaded symbols for /boot/kernel/ng_ubt.ko Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/ng_hci.ko...Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/ng_hci.ko.symbols...done. done. Loaded symbols for /boot/kernel/ng_hci.ko Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/ng_bluetooth.ko...Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/ng_bluetooth.ko.symbols...done. done. Loaded symbols for /boot/kernel/ng_bluetooth.ko Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/netgraph.ko...Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/netgraph.ko.symbols...done. done. Loaded symbols for /boot/kernel/netgraph.ko Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/ng_l2cap.ko...Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/ng_l2cap.ko.symbols...done. done. Loaded symbols for /boot/kernel/ng_l2cap.ko Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/ng_btsocket.ko...Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/ng_btsocket.ko.symbols...done. done. Loaded symbols for /boot/kernel/ng_btsocket.ko Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/ng_socket.ko...Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/ng_socket.ko.symbols...done. done. Loaded symbols for /boot/kernel/ng_socket.ko Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/pf.ko...Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/pf.ko.symbols...done. done. Loaded symbols for /boot/kernel/pf.ko Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/linux.ko...Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/linux.ko.symbols...done. done. Loaded symbols for /boot/kernel/linux.ko Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/vkbd.ko...Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/vkbd.ko.symbols...done. done. Loaded symbols for /boot/kernel/vkbd.ko Reading symbols from /usr/local/modules/fuse.ko...done. Loaded symbols for /usr/local/modules/fuse.ko Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/radeon.ko...Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/radeon.ko.symbols...done. done. Loaded symbols for /boot/kernel/radeon.ko Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/drm.ko...Reading symbols from /boot/kernel/drm.ko.symbols...done. done. Loaded symbols for /boot/kernel/drm.ko #0 doadump (textdump=) at pcpu.h:234 234 pcpu.h: No such file or directory. in pcpu.h #0 doadump (textdump=) at pcpu.h:234 No locals. #1 0xffffffff8090d9a6 in kern_reboot (howto=260) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:449 _ep = (struct eventhandler_entry *) 0x0 _el = (struct eventhandler_list *) 0xfffffe0004914000 first_buf_printf = 1 #2 0xffffffff8090dea7 in panic (fmt=0x1
) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_shutdown.c:637 td = (struct thread *) 0x1 bootopt = newpanic = ap = {{gp_offset = 16, fp_offset = 48, overflow_arg_area = 0xffffff80e7d64230, reg_save_area = 0xffffff80e7d64150}} panic_cpu = 1 buf = "general protection fault", '\0' #3 0xffffffff80cf2c20 in trap_fatal (frame=0x9, eva=) at /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/trap.c:879 code = ss = 40 type = 9 esp = softseg = {ssd_base = 0, ssd_limit = 1048575, ssd_type = 27, ssd_dpl = 0, ssd_p = 1, ssd_long = 1, ssd_def32 = 0, ssd_gran = 1} msg = #4 0xffffffff80cf3431 in trap (frame=0xffffff80e7d64490) at /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/trap.c:605 td = (struct thread *) 0xfffffe0087225490 p = (struct proc *) 0x6 i = ucode = code = 0 type = 0 addr = ksi = {ksi_link = {tqe_next = 0xffffff80e7d64400, tqe_prev = 0xffffffff80993873}, ksi_info = {si_signo = 0, si_errno = 0, si_code = 8, si_pid = 0, si_uid = 3889579456, si_status = -128, si_addr = 0x0, si_value = {sival_int = -405387776, sival_ptr = 0xffffff80e7d64600, sigval_int = -405387776, sigval_ptr = 0xffffff80e7d64600}, _reason = {_fault = { _trapno = -2135743275}, _timer = {_timerid = -2135743275, _overrun = -1}, _mesgq = {_mqd = -2135743275}, _poll = {_band = -2135743275}, __spare__ = {__spare1__ = -2135743275, __spare2__ = {-1361072696, -512, -1361072496, -512, -405388176, -128, -2135575828}}}}, ksi_flags = -2131116318, ksi_sigq = 0x8af} #5 0xffffffff80cdc863 in calltrap () at /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/exception.S:232 No locals. #6 0xffffffff80b7ddb5 in vm_map_entry_splay (addr=34385813504, root=0xfffffe006fd34d00) at /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_map.c:832 llist = 0x0 rlist = 0x0 ltree = rtree = y = 0xfffffe0032325082 #7 0xffffffff80b7ee97 in vm_map_lookup_entry (map=0xfffffe00328dc4b0, address=34385813504, entry=0xffffff80e7d64888) at /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_map.c:1080 cur = 0xfffffe006fd34d00 locked = #8 0xffffffff80b82790 in vm_map_lookup (var_map=0xffffff80e7d64880, vaddr=34385813504, fault_typea=, out_entry=0xffffff80e7d64888, object=0xffffff80e7d64870, pindex=0xffffff80e7d64878, out_prot=0xffffff80e7d648e7 "�\213�J\227ly���\030\177\207", wired=0xffffff80e7d648e0) at /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_map.c:3809 entry = 0xffffff80e7d64888 map = 0xfffffe00328dc4b0 prot = 255 '�' fault_type = 2 '\002' eobject = 0xfffffe0087225490 size = 0 cred = #9 0xffffffff80b78a6e in vm_fault_hold (map=0xfffffe00328dc4b0, vaddr=34385813504, fault_type=2 '\002', fault_flags=0, m_hold=0x0) at /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_fault.c:268 prot = 255 '�' ahead = 4 behind = 0 alloc_req = era = faultcount = 0 reqpage = 0 result = 0 growstack = 1 is_first_object_locked = -2027793264 wired = -405386864 next_object = 0xffffff80e7d64888 hardfault = 0 fs = {m = 0x0, object = 0x0, pindex = 18446743527843318064, first_m = 0xffffffff8098aae2, first_object = 0x0, first_pindex = 18446741877819083008, map = 0xfffffe00328dc4b0, entry = 0xffffffff80b7613c, lookup_still_valid = 1868102304, vp = 0x0, vfslocked = 0} vp = (struct vnode *) 0xffffff80e7d64888 locked = -2027793264 error = #10 0xffffffff80b7b0c3 in vm_fault (map=0xfffffe00328dc4b0, vaddr=34385813504, fault_type=, fault_flags=0) at /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_fault.c:229 td = (struct thread *) 0xfffffe0087225490 result = #11 0xffffffff80cf2e9f in trap_pfault (frame=0xffffff80e7d64c00, usermode=1) at /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/trap.c:762 id = va = 34385813504 vm = map = 0xfffffe00328dc4b0 rv = ftype = 2 '\002' td = (struct thread *) 0xfffffe0087225490 p = (struct proc *) 0xfffffe008723b950 eva = 34385815552 #12 0xffffffff80cf36e4 in trap (frame=0xffffff80e7d64c00) at /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/trap.c:363 regs = {r_r15 = 0, r_r14 = 2161059892, r_r13 = 34387497004, r_r12 = 4096, r_r11 = -2127162112, r_r10 = -2196755990192, r_r9 = 35, r_r8 = -2196755990192, r_rdi = -545866232848, r_rsi = -2133909322, r_rbp = -2196756081520, r_rbx = 2267175152, r_rdx = -545866233088, r_rcx = -2137957845, r_rax = -545866232992, r_trapno = 2157158774, r_fs = 65535, r_gs = 65535, r_err = 3889580928, r_es = 1, r_ds = 0, r_rip = -2126630144, r_cs = 6562141328, r_rflags = -549753520768, r_rsp = 4294967296, r_ss = 4197822} td = (struct thread *) 0xfffffe0087225490 p = (struct proc *) 0xfffffe008723b950 i = ucode = code = 7 type = addr = 34385815552 ksi = {ksi_link = {tqe_next = 0xfffffe0087225490, tqe_prev = 0x207}, ksi_info = {si_signo = 0, si_errno = 0, si_code = 16777215, si_pid = -1, si_uid = 29, si_status = -128, si_addr = 0xffffffff812f4f70, si_value = {sival_int = 15, sival_ptr = 0xf, sigval_int = 15, sigval_ptr = 0xf}, _reason = {_fault = {_trapno = 27758636}, _timer = {_timerid = 27758636, _overrun = 8}, _mesgq = {_mqd = 27758636}, _poll = {_band = 34387497004}, __spare__ = {__spare1__ = 34387497004, __spare2__ = {4096, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}}}}, ksi_flags = 65540, ksi_sigq = 0xffffffff813e3300} #13 0xffffffff80cdc863 in calltrap () at /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/exception.S:232 No locals. #14 0x0000000801293284 in ?? () No symbol table info available. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 20 11:50:30 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CCC6CF4 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 11:50:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpielorz_lst@tdx.co.uk) Received: from mail.tdx.com (mail.tdx.com [62.13.128.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 435812886 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 11:50:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk (storm.tdx.co.uk [62.13.130.251]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.tdx.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/) with ESMTP id r7KBoRa7089642 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 20 Aug 2013 12:50:28 +0100 (BST) Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 12:50:29 +0100 From: Karl Pielorz To: Arthur Chance Subject: Re: jail.conf ignoring exec.fib? Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <52131A55.2040400@qeng-ho.org> References: <98486B2D79D00F0898B7C9E6@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> <520B7F0F.7020006@a1poweruser.com> <1960A5B02323B4982B4C0320@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> <520FA592.7010305@qeng-ho.org> <52131A55.2040400@qeng-ho.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 11:50:30 -0000 --On 20 August 2013 08:27 +0100 Arthur Chance wrote: > In the source the exec.fib parameter is given as an integer, so the > quotes probably shouldn't be there, but I'm not sure whether it matters. I tried it just as 'exec.fib = 1;' originally, and it makes no difference :( > There's definitely a setfib call in the source that's done if exec.fib > exists. All I can think of right now is that you try firing up the jail > using the -v verbose flag. This should show everything the jail command > does as the jail is created. Ok, I tried that and got: " root# jail -v -c jail jail: run command: /sbin/mount -t devfs -oruleset=4 . /usr2/jails/jail/dev jail: jail_set(JAIL_CREATE) persist name=jail devfs_ruleset=4 jid=100 path=/usr2/jails/jail host.hostname=jail.somedomain.com ip4.addr=192.186.0.20 allow.raw_sockets jail: created jail: run command in jail: /bin/sh /etc/rc Setting hostname: jail.somedomain.com ELF ldconfig path: /lib /usr/lib /usr/lib/compat /usr/local/lib 32-bit compatibility ldconfig path: /usr/lib32 Creating and/or trimming log files. ln: /dev/log: Operation not permitted Starting syslogd. Clearing /tmp (X related). Updating motd:. Starting cron. Tue Aug 20 11:39:20 UTC 2013 jail: jail_set(JAIL_UPDATE) jid=100 nopersist " Certainly more detail, but no mention of fib's :( - I tried it both with, and without quotes around the FIB value. You can also see I have raw sockets available for debugging. -Karl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 20 12:37:08 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F214A77B for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 12:37:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-qe0-x230.google.com (mail-qe0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c02::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3E552BB9 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 12:37:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qe0-f48.google.com with SMTP id 3so164014qea.7 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 05:37:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to:organization:face :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZnceNjMb20QaALh00EXvgPZ67qDNPb2Fukz+iV/FI/A=; b=lniMEdLBJ7PVsNDbQL3i8xB5RIPC5PC4i40zuYKFT/z8LPcNyekxpPFwLYNhofaB3f Kby33UZuszIzSkoNKxgzcYYI1TncAotXn3x0HmBx3CMuxTRo/Mk7T+WofF5A1bE5JpsT tK4Gl6SYjg0zHDopRUuwJ+eHHYsAPOKqVrcxU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:reply-to :organization:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=ZnceNjMb20QaALh00EXvgPZ67qDNPb2Fukz+iV/FI/A=; b=mtU2gdB0dCFSLKla65cEcWMpRA3M8N+GQWs3iHyY5ZuhzwPoehAWzfFb+5m0xnhzSR +Z5LNtoWrL+PtZDsNaNbEtfyIBSkxp95UAhr9TKtRHI6p/DV1gyMlxPGrCxNbZsZDQ/F vTcyYIW0Wlz6ETZVI/C59shEzph//QkKhQzUrR7qjfYKYDq0y+0bMlM/+u4QJgFSSsn8 ql5+EA9YfB9xPaZo7uPeN7gWQH5dIBDHsVT5a7lPKNv1HPUhMLahYafmReEu+V+Ib8Y4 7ywe6sqxyPOSocNq4baL/A2kudcu1uWUoLNlMvcczYhBlEJw5ND8szKV17qcrWjC8a1w vR7w== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn6AvE6FrcqVC9Vmmm/cxGo8OrDdn2ZL/fkeo9XngHqsY1caEnzlWvn3Tiu5lAM7tW3/zvy X-Received: by 10.49.25.167 with SMTP id d7mr1631892qeg.35.1377002226640; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 05:37:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id s5sm3387712qan.10.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Aug 2013 05:37:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3cKBN02DHtz2CG67 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 08:37:04 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 08:37:03 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Subject: Custom Software for Municipalities Message-ID: <20130820083703.23404168@scorpio> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 12:37:08 -0000 I have been charged with investigation alternate software packages for use in our community. The one shown at this URL: is an example of what I am referring to. This is the home URL for that software: I work for a town in the county shown above. We are investigating the possibility of setting up something like this on the town's web site to assist our citizens in searching for information. This project has a one year lead-in time, so it is not particularly time sensitive at this moment. We are still in the preliminary stage. The system will undoubtedly be using Microsoft 2013 servers, although I could always get a FreeBSD server integrated into the system if I could find a viable piece of software to handle the job that the ZonePro software does. I have not been able to locate an open-source application that works in a similar manner. Perhaps someone might be familiar with one or has heard of one. -- Jerry â™” Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 20 12:52:54 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70951BCB for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 12:52:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45E6D2C9C for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 12:52:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.42]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id CABCD20E37 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 08:52:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 20 Aug 2013 08:52:52 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:references :subject:date; s=smtpout; bh=fcLulT6gKkhW+1y0qCIO9OOpM3o=; b=XnN V3meCVwaPLCOj3inmCVjflkv+PXMKUw3ZN7ZMDxM3Ulh/0e9gCRYMTuJk42gJQ9B UqMB7XO1pjJWATOWrZBkeY5U/kG+U8fqq7roDJgYyF5N93585Zd4XpBRBYn7idEJ +mHCqNmyahg4nsEpVS0wwgwiprw4j5pFr3RU2fI8= Received: by web3.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id DFC89B02387; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 08:52:50 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1377003170.10888.11972361.04544E6F@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: 8iafG7jUo5BOhGYm2ygWVdj4ayekl8KtW2fz4l2mk7Or 1377003170 From: Mark Felder To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-d009844e In-Reply-To: <20130820083703.23404168@scorpio> References: <20130820083703.23404168@scorpio> Subject: Re: Custom Software for Municipalities Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 07:52:50 -0500 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 12:52:54 -0000 This literally looks like a CRUD interface that could easily be rebuilt. PHPMyEdit, Dadabik, and others provide easy ways to produce these interfaces from database tables. For the record I wouldn't recommend Dadabik unless it does something specific that you need (postgres or sqlite support, I suppose). The developer is strange and doesn't understand open source licenses. A year or so ago I paid him $5 to get a copy of his program, received GPLv2 code, and then he got angry and started threatening me when I published it on github with some minor cleanup and translation fixes. He's since changed the license to something else. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 20 13:31:10 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEBE3A24 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 13:31:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3CBB2EFD for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 13:31:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r7KDV9qK095792; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 07:31:09 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id r7KDV9Uw095789; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 07:31:09 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 07:31:09 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Juris Kaminskis Subject: Re: Setup HP Laserjet 1120m over network with LPD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 20 Aug 2013 07:31:09 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 13:31:11 -0000 On Mon, 19 Aug 2013, Juris Kaminskis wrote: > ok I realised the problem was that i sent plain text to filter instead a > postscript. > > when I run now: > > lpr test.ps > > no error messages appear anymore except that in the /var/spool/hp which is > my spooling directory in the status file I have Sending to 192.168.1.105 > and printer is silent I would get the filter working alone before involving the extra complication of lpd. The documentation at the foo2xqx home page may help: http://foo2xqx.rkkda.com/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 20 13:32:40 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CEF4ADD; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 13:32:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 318F42F19; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 13:32:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r7KDWdov095815; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 07:32:39 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id r7KDWd2w095812; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 07:32:39 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 07:32:39 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Mark Felder Subject: Re: copying milllions of small files and millions of dirs In-Reply-To: <1376934082.25499.11612497.1C73C726@webmail.messagingengine.com> Message-ID: References: <7E7AEB5A-7102-424E-8B1E-A33E0A2C8B2C@gmail.com> <20130816064612.GH1190@petole.demisel.net> <1376934082.25499.11612497.1C73C726@webmail.messagingengine.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 20 Aug 2013 07:32:39 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 13:32:40 -0000 On Mon, 19 Aug 2013, Mark Felder wrote: > On Fri, Aug 16, 2013, at 1:46, Nicolas KOWALSKI wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 11:13:25AM -0700, aurfalien wrote: >>> Is there a faster way to copy files over NFS? >> >> I would use find+cpio. This handles hard links, permissions, and in case >> of later runs, will not copy files if they already exist on the >> destination. >> >> # cd /source/dir >> # find . | cpio -pvdm /destination/dir >> > > I always found sysutils/cpdup to be faster than rsync. sysutils/clone may do better as well. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 20 13:33:35 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4465CB99 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 13:33:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 061722F33 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 13:33:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-92-43.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.92.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E54E3C65A; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:33:26 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id r7KDXLv3005911; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:33:21 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:33:21 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Warren Block Subject: Re: Setup HP Laserjet 1120m over network with LPD Message-Id: <20130820153321.c99e018a.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Juris Kaminskis , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 13:33:35 -0000 On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 07:31:09 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block wrote: > I would get the filter working alone before involving the extra > complication of lpd. The documentation at the foo2xqx home page may > help: http://foo2xqx.rkkda.com/ That is a good advice. I'd suggest to use a PS test page as input, let it run through the filter, and send its output directly to the printer (with netcat if networked, with > to /dev/lpt or /dev/ulpt if local). If _that_ part is working, integrate it with the LPD subsystem or CUPS. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 20 15:50:15 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FF22D45 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:50:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crapsh@monkeybrains.net) Received: from mail.monkeybrains.net (mx1.harsh.monkeybrains.net [208.69.40.13]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5FC3D28F6 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:50:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.6.35.14] (192-195-81-185.PUBLIC.monkeybrains.net [192.195.81.185]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.monkeybrains.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r7KFoEKF092205 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 08:50:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from crapsh@monkeybrains.net) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.monkeybrains.net: Host 192-195-81-185.PUBLIC.monkeybrains.net [192.195.81.185] claimed to be [10.6.35.14] Message-ID: <52139013.5020406@monkeybrains.net> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 08:49:39 -0700 From: Rudy User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130623 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: buildworld breaks at xinstall (9.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.8 at mail.monkeybrains.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:50:15 -0000 When I svnup and make buildworld, I get a failure at xinstall. THings Any chance that FreeBSD will be fixed to allow upgrading in place from 9.1? http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=bin/181344 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 20 15:52:51 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FBD4E21; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:52:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from outbackdingo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oa0-x22f.google.com (mail-oa0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D92E293F; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:52:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id g12so1103050oah.20 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 08:52:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=sSoSa0sep0iY8ntWynQjBc9yqKcwugqgDt5j4iYmjvU=; b=XLY2fgbcntgvierbNDr2G8KUajweoN0L0utijA+pU35egMVb8knTiNJk+9ENWJaFFx r7QNn5lNa+n7fcGnYPkDkyryXyRIhSFt4rws3nPLvJxbmNfgpXhTsNmm6c67bB0NUL78 2k2d2K+aIZC44g3OxZZ6THgdzLGPID7iCstTHoOkhsTiIpCK45WcFN0QlrGHfG5SXLuO 9QwJtKidWIaEbgyVsx8+8QWozVGZ/xv9pAncfGUQRtzEXRDbCFR0EOb6ZJgZ0cOKPPj8 Qwy6kMvuwK78vMoC9ffOzBPeXGMSnmBXfqZ01rEfiT8ooGSH8uQ+5NNzZxURsIAWf8qe KjSA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.119.169 with SMTP id kv9mr2387295obb.66.1377013970280; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 08:52:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.2.110 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 08:52:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1377003170.10888.11972361.04544E6F@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <20130820083703.23404168@scorpio> <1377003170.10888.11972361.04544E6F@webmail.messagingengine.com> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 11:52:50 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Custom Software for Municipalities From: Outback Dingo To: Mark Felder Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:52:51 -0000 On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:52 AM, Mark Felder wrote: > This literally looks like a CRUD interface that could easily be rebuilt. > PHPMyEdit, Dadabik, and others provide easy ways to produce these > interfaces from database tables. > > For the record I wouldn't recommend Dadabik unless it does something > specific that you need (postgres or sqlite support, I suppose). The > developer is strange and doesn't understand open source licenses. A year > or so ago I paid him $5 to get a copy of his program, received GPLv2 > code, and then he got angry and started threatening me when I published > it on github with some minor cleanup and translation fixes. He's since > changed the license to something else. > I concur, whats posted looks like a joke... can be reproduced by any decent php dev in probably a few hours, and im sure theres plenty of "engines" open source already available........ > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 20 17:02:58 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F30731BE for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 17:02:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from blue.qeng-ho.org (blue.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7F6C32D82 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 17:02:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r7KH2st9073731; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:02:55 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Message-ID: <5213A13E.9050307@qeng-ho.org> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:02:54 +0100 From: Arthur Chance User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130810 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Karl Pielorz Subject: Re: jail.conf ignoring exec.fib? References: <98486B2D79D00F0898B7C9E6@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> <520B7F0F.7020006@a1poweruser.com> <1960A5B02323B4982B4C0320@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> <520FA592.7010305@qeng-ho.org> <52131A55.2040400@qeng-ho.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 17:02:58 -0000 On 20/08/2013 12:50, Karl Pielorz wrote: > > > --On 20 August 2013 08:27 +0100 Arthur Chance wrote: > >> In the source the exec.fib parameter is given as an integer, so the >> quotes probably shouldn't be there, but I'm not sure whether it matters. > > I tried it just as 'exec.fib = 1;' originally, and it makes no > difference :( > >> There's definitely a setfib call in the source that's done if exec.fib >> exists. All I can think of right now is that you try firing up the jail >> using the -v verbose flag. This should show everything the jail command >> does as the jail is created. > > Ok, I tried that and got: > > " > root# jail -v -c jail > jail: run command: /sbin/mount -t devfs -oruleset=4 . /usr2/jails/jail/dev > jail: jail_set(JAIL_CREATE) persist name=jail devfs_ruleset=4 jid=100 > path=/usr2/jails/jail host.hostname=jail.somedomain.com > ip4.addr=192.186.0.20 allow.raw_sockets > jail: created > jail: run command in jail: /bin/sh /etc/rc > Setting hostname: jail.somedomain.com > ELF ldconfig path: /lib /usr/lib /usr/lib/compat /usr/local/lib > 32-bit compatibility ldconfig path: /usr/lib32 > Creating and/or trimming log files. > ln: /dev/log: Operation not permitted > Starting syslogd. > Clearing /tmp (X related). > Updating motd:. > Starting cron. > > Tue Aug 20 11:39:20 UTC 2013 > jail: jail_set(JAIL_UPDATE) jid=100 nopersist > " > > Certainly more detail, but no mention of fib's :( - I tried it both > with, and without quotes around the FIB value. You can also see I have > raw sockets available for debugging. I can't test this directly, as I'm running a generic kernel so only have one fib. However, if I add the invalid (under GENERIC) "exec.fib = 1;" to my jail.conf and try launching the jail with -v I get (slightly cut) testjail: run command: /sbin/mount -t devfs -oruleset=4 . /jails/jail/testjail/root/dev testjail: jail_set(JAIL_CREATE) persist name=testjail enforce_statfs=2 ip6=disable path=/jails/jail/testjail/root host.hostname=testjail.home.qeng-ho.org allow.set_hostname=false ip4.addr=172.16.4.2 securelevel=1 testjail: created testjail: run command in jail: /bin/sh /etc/rc jail: testjail: setfib: Invalid argument jail: testjail: /bin/sh /etc/rc: failed testjail: removed so it certainly has tried the setfib and knows it has failed. And that's just made me think of something else - I have a horrible feeling that jexec will attach to the jail using whatever fib it's running under, i.e. the fib from the host environment. Do you have (or can you enable) ssh running in the jail? If so, log into the jail that way, and see what sysctl net.my_fibnum shows then, because you'll be running under the environment created by /etc/rc. -- In the dungeons of Mordor, Sauron bred Orcs with LOLcats to create a new race of servants. Called Uruk-Oh-Hai in the Black Speech, they were cruel and delighted in torturing spelling and grammar. _Lord of the Rings 2.0, the Web Edition_ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 20 17:23:35 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2149555 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 17:23:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B06502EB8 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 17:23:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VBpeR-0001c4-8C for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 19:23:27 +0200 Received: from cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com ([86.21.186.149]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 19:23:27 +0200 Received: from walterhurry by cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 19:23:27 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Walter Hurry Subject: What's wrong here? Can't reinstall graphics/lcms2 Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 17:23:03 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 27 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginmedia.com User-Agent: Pan/0.139 (Sexual Chocolate; GIT bf56508 git://git.gnome.org/pan2) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 17:23:36 -0000 $ sudo portupgrade -f graphics/lcms2 [Reading data from pkg(8) ... - 544 packages found - done] ---> Reinstalling 'lcms2-2.5' (graphics/lcms2) ---> Building '/usr/ports/graphics/lcms2' ===> Cleaning for lcms2-2.5 ===> lcms2-2.5 has known vulnerabilities: lcms2-2.5 is vulnerable: lcms2 -- Null Pointer Dereference Denial of Service Vulnerability WWW: http://portaudit.FreeBSD.org/9a0a892e-05d8-11e3- ba09-000c29784fd1.html => Please update your ports tree and try again. *** [check-vulnerable] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/lcms2. *** [build] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/lcms2. ** Command failed [exit code 1]: /usr/bin/script -qa /tmp/ portupgrade20130820-93880-13u5qwy env UPGRADE_TOOL=portupgrade UPGRADE_PORT=lcms2-2.5 UPGRADE_PORT_VER=2.5 make ** Fix the problem and try again. ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed) ! graphics/lcms2 (lcms2-2.5) (unknown build error) $ I have of course updated the ports tree but it made no difference. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 20 18:14:21 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F11D37E7 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:14:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from terje@elde.net) Received: from keepquiet.net (keepquiet.net [78.46.162.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65AF821E9 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:14:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.130.11.119] (cm-84.210.76.250.getinternet.no [84.210.76.250]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: terje@elde.net) by keepquiet.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D02032E413; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 20:14:12 +0200 (CEST) Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) Subject: Re: VPN where local private address collide From: Terje Elde In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 20:14:11 +0200 Message-Id: <01ED803C-F130-4A51-8AEE-FB60CF4CBD05@elde.net> References: <520E5EC0.5090105@fjl.co.uk> <9FB6809B-DD5D-4A04-8BD9-0271FAC03181@elde.net> <520F53A2.80707@fjl.co.uk> <520F8AA8.8030407@fjl.co.uk> <1FF39756-0555-4CD8-95B7-862F9644CF78@elde.net> <791847EC-8E72-4013-9157-7AD0ACB62A7D@elde.net> To: Adam Vande More X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: frank2@fjl.co.uk, FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:14:22 -0000 On Aug 20, 2013, at 8:33 AM, Adam Vande More = wrote: > and while you can rewrite that on a NAT-box using an application level = gateway, you can not do that if the session is using SSL or TLS. >=20 > Complete BS. This seems to come down to a misunderstanding in the examples drawn up, = and of TCP/IP-headers (outside the SSL/TLS encryption) and SIP-headers = (inside the SSL/TLS encryption). Noone is arguing that SSL/TLS would give any troubles with changing TCP = or IP-headers during NAT, and that part seams clear both to the OP and = myself. It's the SIP-headers inside an encrypted SSL/TLS-session that a = NAT-layer wouldn't be able to change, even if it wanted to (and arguably = outside the scope of NAT). > I was referring to headers *inside* the SSL/TLS-layers. I thought = that was obvious, but I see I might not have been clear enough. >=20 > Not clear in the least. Expanding on what is so difficult about might = do a lot of us some good. Read up if you'd like: http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-questions@freebsd.org/msg268807.html I'm not quite sure what part isn't clear, so please email me if there is = anything. Preferrably off-list, this tread seems to be stearing towards = you calling BS based on a misunderstanding, and that's probably not = adding a lot of value to -questions. > Yes, you can often still resolve it on the server, but just how messy = does one want to get stacking workaround on top of workaround, >=20 > Despite your protestations to the contrary, NAT and SIP work quite = weil together in basic configurations including TLS and the OP's = scenario. I can't explain your difficulties but perhaps when you = aren't at a mobile device you could answer a question in depth. >=20 >=20 > The server would register that the phone is available at 192.168.0.200 = (locally, in lan_b), while the server would actually need to send to = 192.168.2.200, in order to reach 192.168.0.200 in lan_a. > =20 >=20 > Exactly how this would behave depends on a lot of factors, but you'd = quickly end up with a situation in which the phone *appears* to work, = can register against the server and call out (both client-initiated), = but where incoming calls just don't work (sent to 192.168.0.200 in = lan_b, rather than in lan_a). >=20 > Could you could post your config to demonstrate what you are doing = incorrectly? I'm not doing anything incorrectly or otherwise, and I'm not having any = difficulties with anything. I drew up an example, to illustrate a = point. And I know very well that NAT and SIP with TLS *can* work quite well in = such a setup. In fact, I'm even arguing it. If the server does the = right thing in a non-standard scenario, things can work quite well out = of the box even. However, if the server doesn't do the right thing in = this scenario, you might have a good bunch of debugging on your hands. I've never argued that you can't get it to work, I'm arguing that the = farther away from standards you go, the more you might break and have to = fix or find workarounds for. Terje From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 20 18:15:26 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF02988C for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:15:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ee0-x22b.google.com (mail-ee0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c00::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 579D621FE for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:15:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f43.google.com with SMTP id e52so360042eek.30 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 11:15:24 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=1TgaRbNwRmHNov98oJNkFxdQONPtUC6f1dNosDmBLTA=; b=kDp8zsaLEyTiJxlZty1CozEiwtELLQ3+34hGvklnlT9tNcDiflbSJCB4n5jKsXD2JY 3Cu5fGri8dNMqutKhZiwz0LVCSSdveJbBo42nbd/4QAdjaTL4KUGIPUPj65WikE5ICU1 x9d0dHZl458Y39urXyHVsjKn7xYsXQIRVvcYiE5yCZR4EQNBVrbYBgBW5+SmNxrzuRbD 3k5Zsme7SoFODTjW9hZC1wNSSOOFtIsycG4g2ZRdsKRdqM3yWJhTEh6D5bYguGqy7eHs PQeN+JtP/CgfmfewHJd62TysQpYpclcD97p4XTk1plqbs3jsjWM3ntQt3sOq32UWlrfb kovg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.15.36.9 with SMTP id h9mr3824879eev.30.1377022524667; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 11:15:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.142.209 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 11:15:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 11:15:24 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: What's wrong here? Can't reinstall graphics/lcms2 From: Kurt Buff To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:15:26 -0000 On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Walter Hurry wrote: > $ sudo portupgrade -f graphics/lcms2 > => Please update your ports tree and try again. > *** [check-vulnerable] Error code 1 > > I have of course updated the ports tree but it made no difference. Try updating ports again. I was successful in updating lcms2 this morning on a couple of boxes, after failures yesterday. Kurt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 20 18:19:31 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71C03995 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:19:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ryanrfrederick@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-x233.google.com (mail-ob0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B6992242 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:19:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f179.google.com with SMTP id fb19so1232177obc.10 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 11:19:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=YTvoknegcXLn7g0yOB+HTl0H9dWQHHrt+mbLn7XW4kY=; b=TrOt1viXcMDqYDaI2zy5oLE6liV2RQnJZDEjr9UI2Ls88m3FbalYYa5tIBJO2momSG HTRCqUAGLK6vo1H8qTNDuOGGho/2ney7XHmsQ9vEIM5qT2Snp3ZOWPIfCvfutT198ppT kiIp63QAhl0yE/NRxePnZFHOpK0lTjI6b0DfxRQdPwZdv78ssnx2zbt4SFnnrP4NKumY L6TB6+PeI8mEU7KMJg80INTewyJd/Tkc4NJtFKdRjB8EsHw+TY94sFwZxUVMvJkUTFqe jI0Nk0K7U3qN7b9cOU77LMHDeaqKbNRHlmHC6ACZI+vCJJMlWAr9YVCSTxe7k2BkdVcK 0PZg== X-Received: by 10.182.76.38 with SMTP id h6mr3164513obw.74.1377022770523; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 11:19:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2610:1d8:a03:1:d267:e5ff:fe44:3b30? ([2610:1d8:a03:1:d267:e5ff:fe44:3b30]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id it7sm3718881obb.11.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Aug 2013 11:19:29 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <5213B32E.9050008@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 13:19:26 -0500 From: Ryan Frederick User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130803 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What's wrong here? Can't reinstall graphics/lcms2 References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:19:31 -0000 There was an entry in vuxml for lcms2 < 2.5 earlier this week that initially included 2.5 accidentally. It's been corrected now, so an update of your ports vulnerability database should allow you to install/update lcms2. Ryan On 08/20/2013 01:15 PM, Kurt Buff wrote: > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Walter Hurry wrote: >> $ sudo portupgrade -f graphics/lcms2 > >> => Please update your ports tree and try again. >> *** [check-vulnerable] Error code 1 >> >> I have of course updated the ports tree but it made no difference. > > Try updating ports again. I was successful in updating lcms2 this > morning on a couple of boxes, after failures yesterday. > > Kurt > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 20 18:41:33 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 265BDF14 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:41:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists.dan@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qa0-x232.google.com (mail-qa0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DAA1D23A4 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:41:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id f14so540594qak.9 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 11:41:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=sW04y/yFk55OSA7WOGp7uJovq5EkYPF+10XQovHeHtQ=; b=ExUtkS4MK2w76SmPCIIHNdbF8yoy9kg9+02X2/57/5fbhhZP0DZljTh+h54JoIBBUW tKBpGcrYriStVQ+b/1/C4lQuPUuDV6Xi774gdNf+YbrtQc+nXzoapzHSXS/xXvDvf2p0 v9iA+9jMvXMdddab17x1xDgOFHk/SvKtljJYMiB8U5nUkzvA1wHoSYqgm2ONLSecIH+7 PTUJuWfpidqrzcXBI5vuC53lNWkVFAB/dWSiBe5Cai0KstWrA1owFvcs3mvITMGftog2 KUSbJAx/ZJ6/ueN3w4XMtE6N1FEtJJGV5T807gUpf0YyJA7mRn/q7NkiyMzZAxvfmPEO I4wQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.35.196 with SMTP id q4mr3331105qad.106.1377024091958; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 11:41:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.224.218.134 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 11:41:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <52128B95.30006@blackfoot.net> References: <5211B5E1.6040000@blackfoot.net> <52128B95.30006@blackfoot.net> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 13:41:31 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ipfw confusion From: Dan Lists To: Gary Aitken Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 18:41:33 -0000 You might turn on logging and post the logs of what is being blocked. Sometimes things are being blocked by rules you do not expect. On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Gary Aitken wrote: > On 08/19/13 00:36, Jason Cox wrote: > > Are you sure that your DNS requests are over TCP? DNS primarily uses UDP > to > > serve requests. TCP is used when the response data size exceeds 512 bytes > > (I think), or for tasks such as zone transfers. I know a few resolver > > implementations use TCP for all queries, but most I have used not. You > > might want to add rules to allow UDP as well. > > There are identical rules included for udp: > > 21149 allow udp from any to 12.32.44.142 dst-port 53 in via tun0 keep-state > 21169 allow udp from any to 12.32.36.65 dst-port 53 in via tun0 keep-state > > One of the requests which is being refused is a zone transfer request from > a secondary which is a tcp request. Others are probably udp. > > > On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Gary Aitken >wrote: > > > >> I'm having some weird ipfw behavior, or it seems weird to me, and am > >> looking > >> for an explaination and then a way out. > >> > >> ipfw list > >> ... > >> 21109 allow tcp from any to 12.32.44.142 dst-port 53 in via tun0 setup > >> keep-state > >> 21129 allow tcp from any to 12.32.36.65 dst-port 53 in via tun0 setup > >> keep-state > >> ... > >> 65534 deny log logamount 5 ip from any to any > >> > >> tail -f messages > >> Aug 18 23:33:06 nightmare named[914]: client 188.231.152.46#63877: error > >> sending response: permission denied > >> > >> 12.32.36.65 is the addr of the internal interface (xl0) on the firewall > >> and is the public dns server. > >> 12.32.44.142 is the addr of the external interface (tun0) which is > bridged > >> on a > >> dsl line. > >> > >> It appears that a dns request was allowed in, but the response was not > >> allowed > >> back out. It seems to me the above rules 21109 and 21129 should have > >> allowed > >> the request in and the response back out. > >> > >> It's possible a request could come in on 12.32.44.142, > >> which is why 21109 is present; > >> although I know I am getting failures to reply to refresh requests > >> from a secondary addressed to 12.32.36.65 > >> > >> What am I missing? > >> > >> Is there a problem if the incoming rule is for tun0, > >> which gets passed to named > >> since 12.32.44.142 is on the physical machine running named, > >> but named pumps its response out on 12.32.36.65, > >> relying on routing to get it to the right place, > >> and that fails to match the state tracking mechanism > >> which started with 12.32.44.142? > >> _______________________________________________ > >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > >> freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > >> > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 20 20:28:17 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D478CAC for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 20:28:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamesgosnell@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ee0-x231.google.com (mail-ee0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4013:c00::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E01A42A56 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 20:28:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ee0-f49.google.com with SMTP id d41so416954eek.22 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 13:28:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=8Zryag7tpeIrR+qAqGPtAsH06zo+9MGeMAQMtE7jbXk=; b=A8EVLVKuWtVw5H3ydQ1MSzPiC13SB6nBMNjTlgjwFebrALsLuQARr8Rb2sNzLWTBcx icIL6JQlapPzM+4uZknTJFG1KLOJ3mRdoh/7ApRhrRX2RsP4wAL6wZVr+mdzgVLWYX1Y Xh/oUz9VmhthkvHNuAIbU2QV5I+qCFUlVN1YoA1AAlM1ZfU5awpz88+SfTsnRs8a6Hv/ R0AYYnwEvII8hbDWagLS5Pyerw5kxdNFZb+YZPFAF6oM25uazfaNxjBctHAGWgF5wIyB IG/ofqBZwM3WQnmVpFZJxVQ5aWa9Vn2AS8gtQET4p3LphMpdV/UJyH7bsW6GnPRTfL02 njWw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.15.48.197 with SMTP id h45mr4420042eew.0.1377030495020; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 13:28:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.223.197.8 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 13:28:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130820083703.23404168@scorpio> References: <20130820083703.23404168@scorpio> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 15:28:14 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Custom Software for Municipalities From: James Gosnell To: FreeBSD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 20:28:17 -0000 I've done better looking MVC framework websites using PHP Yii Framework, Perl Catalyst or Perl Mojolicious. It was a while ago, but I had no experience with MVC back then. It took me about a week to completely grok the frameworks and concepts (like authorization model abstraction). After you have knowledge of the framework, I would say it would take a day to make the simple CRUD layout that you see and then a week or two to polish it off. I would conservatively give a programmer a month to complete and polish a similar system, with all the database design, modifications to the views, models and controllers. It looks like the programmer might of been using ASP MVC, but I can't fully tell. I'd recommend you go with an open-source stack of FreeBSD, PostgreSQL Database and one of the Frameworks I mentioned above. I'd recommend Ruby on Rails if I knew more about it. I have no knowledge of Python MVC frameworks. On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 7:37 AM, Jerry wrote: > I have been charged with investigation alternate software packages for > use in our community. The one shown at this URL: > is an example of what I am > referring to. This is the home URL for that software: > > > I work for a town in the county shown above. We are investigating the > possibility of setting up something like this on the town's web site to > assist our citizens in searching for information. This project has a > one year lead-in time, so it is not particularly time sensitive at this > moment. We are still in the preliminary stage. The system will > undoubtedly be using Microsoft 2013 servers, although I could always > get a FreeBSD server integrated into the system if I could find a > viable piece of software to handle the job that the ZonePro software > does. > > I have not been able to locate an open-source application that works in > a similar manner. Perhaps someone might be familiar with one or has > heard of one. > > -- > Jerry =E2=99=94 > > Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. > Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. > __________________________________________________________________ > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" --=20 James Gosnell, ACP From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Aug 20 20:37:21 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7004BE26 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 20:37:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from remailer@dizum.com) Received: from sewer.dizum.com (sewer.dizum.com [194.109.206.211]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3931A2ADD for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 20:37:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by sewer.dizum.com (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 78806609D2; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 22:30:01 +0200 (CEST) From: Nomen Nescio Comments: This message did not originate from the Sender address above. It was remailed automatically by anonymizing remailer software. Please report problems or inappropriate use to the remailer administrator at . To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: oMEGA-MUSiC.se - Free MP3 Download - News ... - Xmarks Message-ID: <927688d8a871faabab96989f9ea47f7c@dizum.com> Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 22:30:01 +0200 (CEST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2013 20:37:21 -0000 http://www.omegamusic.se/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 21 06:16:34 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9897AC7E; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 06:16:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from varanasisai@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vc0-x22b.google.com (mail-vc0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 364D7293C; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 06:16:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f171.google.com with SMTP id ij15so3672vcb.30 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 23:16:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Wkj6Hf0+b6mvtMcIFyzlokOVXz/ELoFzYrwElmCkoN8=; b=e/82qBHIqhHjhk2tGqG+lUwuGuJ7XNke7q9BKXhYvq/pYRULsGM7usYvuamimjfjx7 JIlPrakpLJ/oFnU6MmQRTcc2k4o9AVijWLkUZeB/NA6NWhurUN9ba1XQkSYYmJ++u2dL oi1MKTaxgUxDGyXnV01IRyy9OHTcy2XcNGuoNK4IXjMDY03ZWNENML5d+RIPSxnsE2Lw zKfbAILxUxW8FVQUB2czz/HXZ1kt/BEqIMnCs2ZO4KyPwMhvboWzxzc3Wt9RrYGOhcgI uI/Z3n6X75GtGWqqmz2gwSIOut62JLls/cmjQNqcwMkDjze7e0Ox/BrvNEBG/C2WD/2s ZFDw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.92.73 with SMTP id ck9mr4135321vdb.2.1377065793357; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 23:16:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.233.4 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 23:16:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:46:33 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: UUID in fstab. From: varanasi sainath To: freebsd-drivers@freebsd.org, freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 06:16:34 -0000 Hello, How to find UUID's for Disk volumes. I have used sysctl -a | grep uuid and was able to find freebsd-swap b55ff220-dcdd-11e2-a324-00155d55b20c freebsd-ufs b55762fc-dcdd-11e2-a324-00155d55b20c are these the corresponding UUID's for swap and ufs. I din't find /dev/ufsid folder to get the UUID's I have used glabel and was able to create labels, system boots well, everything works fine but I don't want to use labels (operating constraint: to create labels I have to boot into single user mode, is there a way to create labels on mounted partitions (I hope not)). I found gptid folder which has boot UUID can this be used? How to use UUID's in fstab? I have tried using # Device Mountpoint FStype Options Dump Pass# uuid=b55762fc-dcdd-11e2-a324-00155d55b20c / ufs rw 1 1 that din't work. I found (from a post) /dev/ufsid/ should be used in fstab but I don't see ufsid in /dev. Do we need to create this or does the system does it? Note: Using FreeBSD 9.1. created partitions using the guided partition tool. Reason: using a SCSI storage driver which changes the drive name accordingly but freebsd installer (boot) is unable to find the drives which results in boot failure. Thanks, Sainath.* * * * *"Learning is the key to excellence".* From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 21 06:18:22 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EEFCE1E for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 06:18:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-oa0-f48.google.com (mail-oa0-f48.google.com [209.85.219.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF8A32976 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 06:18:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id o17so13882oag.21 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 23:18:15 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=ZmK/2DTE7dxWqo0p6IXup4GNRDuZj/wp0o8zptUCJe4=; b=oALoLqY7Hp2qvj1apOKI0DhAEZ5aIyOIvj6+Mt579RzYXQUC14ZvkemFXISixsLmay Xr8tkqhnL7tKv4NO7h13VkcuXL/cKNDMDhmBCHz/V6d6kDcwtp7qyZHfCpG65KLTs30K Ee5Jhcm7PTgQlrMjepvdKVUzlRIT7dPnfUjw0O0VJLkBH7AnlBB2Q2un/NuhfbtrqFX9 tdup5zU8YblHE9N9S2oFOGigMCKeF9/2Gfjwdd8KliNpVysFWFuP0W9QpL9HmDpYVSSK xSJgDq8tQksvzclJI3vJqLwOJu/TQd2iETm2razaqt4fLgjni83eOun3QXD+lzCwEFeO sxgw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn8kBKStQnYG5NSeB0eoOrdbMsZfYKxhyRXVzSK6siemxbItjwr5VsvIJhIhlhCP8LAEgJg X-Received: by 10.60.45.65 with SMTP id k1mr6047787oem.48.1377065895588; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 23:18:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from 53.imp.bsdimp.com (50-78-194-198-static.hfc.comcastbusiness.net. [50.78.194.198]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id hl3sm8168629obb.0.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Aug 2013 23:18:14 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Warner Losh Subject: Re: UUID in fstab. Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 00:18:12 -0600 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <503E443D-BC48-4284-8FC4-22B0A50DF147@bsdimp.com> References: To: varanasi sainath X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-drivers@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 06:18:22 -0000 /dev/gptid/$UID maybe what you are looking for? Warner On Aug 21, 2013, at 12:16 AM, varanasi sainath wrote: > Hello, > > How to find UUID's for Disk volumes. > > I have used sysctl -a | grep uuid and was able to find > freebsd-swap > b55ff220-dcdd-11e2-a324-00155d55b20c > > freebsd-ufs > b55762fc-dcdd-11e2-a324-00155d55b20c > > are these the corresponding UUID's for swap and ufs. > > I din't find /dev/ufsid folder to get the UUID's > > I have used glabel and was able to create labels, system boots well, > everything works fine but I don't want to use labels (operating constraint: > to create labels I have to boot into single user mode, is there a way to > create labels on mounted partitions (I hope not)). > > I found gptid folder which has boot UUID can this be used? > > How to use UUID's in fstab? > > I have tried using > # Device Mountpoint FStype Options Dump > Pass# > uuid=b55762fc-dcdd-11e2-a324-00155d55b20c / ufs rw 1 1 > > that din't work. > > I found (from a post) /dev/ufsid/ should be used in fstab but I don't > see ufsid in /dev. Do we need to create this or does the system does it? > > Note: > Using FreeBSD 9.1. created partitions using the guided partition tool. > > Reason: using a SCSI storage driver which changes the drive name > accordingly but freebsd installer (boot) is unable to find the drives which > results in boot failure. > > Thanks, > Sainath.* > * > * > * > *"Learning is the key to excellence".* > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-drivers@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-drivers > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-drivers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 21 06:54:28 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FA1278B for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 06:54:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from antoniok.spb@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x232.google.com (mail-wi0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 185B52BB4 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 06:54:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f178.google.com with SMTP id j17so32453wiw.17 for ; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 23:54:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=W+VGZ0bWOdcbRkN4ZPe83WaQsUKbam7k/B3PQYd3wpw=; b=RRVRrqhxfchaQhj7G7Jipbvb9oMsGkDHTIz8ErRBQ5ztWlM1LkFvy5kwzOweVJfs46 MGOSD5EEw7kGrwyeTKbzKc7TCJSrxg3Mrtmy53imMFKy3S/VEDQJeGUTGNUb/7///X01 vxhbONoQdRcSV7L5ceCq7nKugzPehb1x5kj2/JJ0MxcC55ZBXC4JH2Lozpfw/j5X3qFk 8s06I6xQ9t2KhEA0XgDP7JlIoLzicd1fXyo62UEyKUxp+F+YvwD+IEqJYaOOThPbzrHv GZZp55ane5tIGQsIMv0YOy2lsncU5grnT6iBiU+hifOk0/467ld/WDe0Wy+nuSNfQqrT TVXw== X-Received: by 10.194.220.103 with SMTP id pv7mr4544552wjc.14.1377068066395; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 23:54:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.110.69 with HTTP; Tue, 20 Aug 2013 23:54:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Antonio Kless Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:54:06 +0400 Message-ID: Subject: Way to be announced about security updates and new releases To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 06:54:28 -0000 Is there any way to be noticed, when security updates or new releases are available? https://twitter.com/freebsd nearly would be a solution, if it did not repostquestions from its subscribers and other information that is not related to updates. -- Best regards, Antonio From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 21 07:11:46 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFE4FB23 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 07:11:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd01@dgmm.net) Received: from outbound-queue-2.mail.thdo.gradwell.net (outbound-queue-2.mail.thdo.gradwell.net [212.11.70.35]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6C432CD4 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 07:11:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outbound-edge-2.mail.thdo.gradwell.net (bonnie.gradwell.net [212.11.70.2]) by outbound-queue-2.mail.thdo.gradwell.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7A8A2272F for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 08:10:35 +0100 (BST) Received: from cpc7-jarr12-2-0-cust882.16-2.cable.virginmedia.com (HELO amd.asgard.uk) (92.238.71.115) (smtp-auth username dave%pop3.dgmm.net, mechanism plain) by outbound-edge-2.mail.thdo.gradwell.net (qpsmtpd/0.83) with ESMTPA; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 08:10:35 +0100 From: dgmm To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Way to be announced about security updates and new releases Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 08:10:33 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.7 (FreeBSD/9.1-RELEASE-p5; KDE/4.10.5; amd64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201308210810.33839.freebsd01@dgmm.net> X-Gradwell-MongoId: 521467eb.11b85-207b-2 X-Gradwell-Auth-Method: mailbox X-Gradwell-Auth-Credentials: dave@pop3.dgmm.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 07:11:46 -0000 On Wednesday 21 August 2013 07:54:06 Antonio Kless wrote: > Is there any way to be noticed, when security updates or new releases are > available? > > https://twitter.com/freebsd nearly would be a solution, if it did not > repostquestions from its > subscribers and other information that is not related to updates. Mailing list Freebsd-announce@freebsd.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 21 10:26:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BF96CF8 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:26:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bestseoservice.ethan@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-x250.google.com (mail-ob0-x250.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::250]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE2B22E54 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:26:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f208.google.com with SMTP id wd20so3529obb.7 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 03:26:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=3atADR4Gn8MFB96daG2hu1A2uTC+DtJRY0ipk5d2xtg=; b=KO0qH3khOcCBmdTBX2i1SGFNTTqD4CYBCUgihrAB/AJgYeg8DH422ueVKGdDvIU09x am7tYYvpbNkm87Pwpr/AR6TVcVyrXIYYtTzT23ZIJxHroyCVSIGMkYR2mys9KuJLDiOZ VYI7y/uRRZd6/PHgabGMuBG9+nT4PohiRUDmPjeNlSzRPDTOTYZaqqFZQHl0wjArxQWd rGujhl3e9DA7lz7Q9etZ4Kk3xJi5WzyvJtd20353zsqXumgNuygWyChJudB+BDLUmhiN 2dIIaHoM7OYp2pw8kt9E33eVpP/muijj/v3yryuX0xV7+taF5QmHqjt94AwkRLS8df0u 2iYg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.63.143 with SMTP id c15mr3530809ici.7.1377080770070; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 03:26:10 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <90e6ba3fcddb20a2b204e4729a5f@google.com> Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:26:10 +0000 Subject: Freebsddiary.org - Integrated marketing help From: Joseph Taylor To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:26:11 -0000 PGRpdiBkaXI9Imx0ciI+PHAgc3R5bGU9Im1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206MGNtIj48Zm9udCBjb2xvcj0i IzAwMDBmZiIgIA0KZmFjZT0iVmVyZGFuYSwgc2Fucy1zZXJpZiI+PGI+RnJlZWJzZGRpYXJ5Lm9y ZzwvYj48L2ZvbnQ+oDxmb250ICANCmNvbG9yPSIjMDAwMGZmIj48Zm9udCBmYWNlPSJWZXJkYW5h LCBzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj5UZWFtLDwvZm9udD48L2ZvbnQ+PC9wPg0KPHAgc3R5bGU9Im1hcmdpbi1i b3R0b206MGNtIj48Zm9udCBjb2xvcj0iIzAwMDBmZiI+PGZvbnQgZmFjZT0iVmVyZGFuYSwgIA0K c2Fucy1zZXJpZiI+PGZvbnQ+SQ0KdGhvdWdodCB5b3UgbWlnaHQgbGlrZSB0byBrbm93IHNvbWUg cmVhc29ucyB3aHkgeW91IGFyZSBub3QgZ2V0dGluZw0KZW5vdWdoIFNvY2lhbCBNZWRpYSBhbmQg T3JnYW5pYyBzZWFyY2ggZW5naW5lIHRyYWZmaWMgIA0KZm9yPC9mb250PjwvZm9udD48L2ZvbnQ+ PGZvbnQgY29sb3I9IiMwMDAwZmYiIGZhY2U9IlZlcmRhbmEsICANCnNhbnMtc2VyaWYiPkZyZWVi c2RkaWFyeS5vcmc8L2ZvbnQ+PC9wPg0KPHAgc3R5bGU9Im1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206MGNtIj48Zm9u dCBjb2xvcj0iIzAwMDBmZiI+PGZvbnQgZmFjZT0iVmVyZGFuYSwgIA0Kc2Fucy1zZXJpZiI+PGZv bnQ+MS4NCllvdXIgd2Vic2l0ZaA8L2ZvbnQ+PGZvbnQ+PGI+RnJlZWJzZGRpYXJ5Lm9yZzwvYj6g PC9mb250PmlzDQpub3QgcmFua2luZyB0b3AgaW4gR29vZ2xlIG9yZ2FuaWMgc2VhcmNoZXMgZm9y IG1hbnkgY29tcGV0aXRpdmUNCmtleXdvcmQgcGhyYXNlcy48L2ZvbnQ+PC9mb250PjwvcD4NCjxw IHN0eWxlPSJtYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tOjBjbSI+PGZvbnQgY29sb3I9IiMwMDAwZmYiPjxmb250IGZh Y2U9IlZlcmRhbmEsICANCnNhbnMtc2VyaWYiPjIuDQpZb3VyIGNvbXBhbnkgaXMgbm90IGRvaW5n IHdlbGwgaW4gbW9zdCBvZiB0aGUgU29jaWFsIE1lZGlhICANCldlYnNpdGVzLjwvZm9udD48L2Zv bnQ+PC9wPg0KPHAgc3R5bGU9Im1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206MGNtIj48Zm9udCBjb2xvcj0iIzAwMDBm ZiI+PGZvbnQgZmFjZT0iVmVyZGFuYSwgIA0Kc2Fucy1zZXJpZiI+My4NCllvdXIgc2l0ZSBpcyBu b3QgdXNlciBmcmllbmRseSBvbiBtb2JpbGUgZGV2aWNlcy48L2ZvbnQ+PC9mb250PjwvcD4NCjxw IHN0eWxlPSJtYXJnaW4tYm90dG9tOjBjbSI+PGZvbnQgY29sb3I9IiMwMDAwZmYiPjxmb250IGZh Y2U9IlZlcmRhbmEsICANCnNhbnMtc2VyaWYiPlRoZXJlDQphcmUgbWFueSBhZGRpdGlvbmFsIGlt cHJvdmVtZW50cyB0aGF0IGNvdWxkIGJlIG1hZGUgdG8geW91ciB3ZWJzaXRlLA0KYW5kIGlmIHlv dSB3b3VsZCBsaWtlIHRvIGxlYXJuIGFib3V0IHRoZW0sIGFuZCBhcmUgY3VyaW91cyB0byBrbm93 DQp3aGF0IG91ciB3b3JraW5nIHRvZ2V0aGVyIHdvdWxkIGludm9sdmUsIHRoZW4gSSB3b3VsZCBi ZSBnbGFkIHRvDQpwcm92aWRlIHlvdSB3aXRoIGEgZGV0YWlsZWQgYW5hbHlzaXMgaW4gdGhlIGZv cm0gb2YgYSA8Yj5XRUJTSVRFDQpBVURJVCBSRVBPUlQgZm9yIEZSRUU8L2I+LjwvZm9udD48L2Zv bnQ+PC9wPg0KPHAgc3R5bGU9Im1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206MGNtIj48Zm9udCBjb2xvcj0iIzAwMDBm ZiI+PGZvbnQgZmFjZT0iVmVyZGFuYSwgIA0Kc2Fucy1zZXJpZiI+T3VyDQpjbGllbnRzIGNvbnNp c3RlbnRseSB0ZWxsIHVzIHRoYXQgdGhlaXIgY3VzdG9tZXJzIGZpbmQgdGhlbSBiZWNhdXNlDQp0 aGV5IGFyZSBhdCB0aGUgdG9wIG9mIHRoZSBHb29nbGUgc2VhcmNoIHJhbmtpbmdzLiBCZWluZyBh dCB0aGUgdG9wDQpsZWZ0IG9mIEdvb2dsZSAoIzEtICMzIG9yZ2FuaWMgcG9zaXRpb25zKSBpcyB0 aGUgYmVzdCB0aGluZyB5b3UgY2FuDQpkbyBmb3IgeW91ciBjb21wYW55JiMzOTtzIHdlYnNpdGUg dHJhZmZpYyBhbmQgb25saW5lIHJlcHV0YXRpb24uIFlvdSB3aWxsDQpiZSBoYXBweSB0byBrbm93 IHRoYXQsIG15IHRlYW0gaXMgd2lsbGluZyB0byBndWFyYW50ZWUgeW91IDE8c3VwPnN0PC9zdXA+ DQpwYWdlIEdvb2dsZSByYW5raW5nIGZvciBtb3N0IG9mIHlvdXIgdGFyZ2V0ZWQga2V5d29yZCBw aHJhc2VzIGluIG91cg0Kc2l4IG1vbnRoIG9uZ29pbmcgY2FtcGFpZ24uPC9mb250PjwvZm9udD48 L3A+DQo8cCBzdHlsZT0ibWFyZ2luLWJvdHRvbTowY20iPjxmb250IGNvbG9yPSIjMDAwMGZmIj48 Zm9udCBmYWNlPSJWZXJkYW5hLCAgDQpzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj5Tb3VuZA0KaW50ZXJlc3Rpbmc/IEZl ZWwgZnJlZSB0byBlbWFpbCB1cyBvciBhbHRlcm5hdGl2ZWx5IHlvdSBjYW4gcHJvdmlkZQ0KbWUg d2l0aCB5b3VyIHBob25lIG51bWJlciBhbmQgdGhlIGJlc3QgdGltZSB0byBjYWxsIHlvdS4gSSBh bSBhbHNvDQphdmFpbGFibGUgdG8gbWVldCB5b3UgaW4gcGVyc29uIGFuZCBwcmVzZW50IHlvdSB0 aGlzIHdlYnNpdGUgYXVkaXQNCnJlcG9ydC48YnI+LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tPFdCUj4tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS08V0JSPi0tLS0tPGJyPkJlc3QN ClJlZ2FyZHMsPGJyPjwvZm9udD48L2ZvbnQ+PGZvbnQgY29sb3I9IiMwMDAwZmYiPjxmb250IGZh Y2U9IlZlcmRhbmEsICANCnNhbnMtc2VyaWYiPjxiPkpvc2VwaCBUYXlsb3I8L2I+PC9mb250Pjwv Zm9udD48Zm9udCBjb2xvcj0iIzAwMDBmZiI+PGZvbnQgIA0KZmFjZT0iVmVyZGFuYSwgc2Fucy1z ZXJpZiI+PGJyPk1hcmtldGluZyBDb25zdWx0YW50PGJyPjwvZm9udD48L2ZvbnQ+PGZvbnQgIA0K Y29sb3I9IiMwMDAwZmYiPjxmb250IGZhY2U9IlZlcmRhbmEsIHNhbnMtc2VyaWYiPjx1PjxhICAN CmhyZWY9InRlbDolMjgzMTUlMjktODk1LTE0NTMiIHRhcmdldD0iX2JsYW5rIj4oPC9hPjxhICAN CmhyZWY9InRlbDozMTUlMjktODk1LTE0NTMiIHZhbHVlPSIrMTMxNTg5NTE0NTMiICANCnRhcmdl dD0iX2JsYW5rIj4zMTUpLTg5NS0xNDUzPC9hPjwvdT48L2ZvbnQ+PC9mb250Pjxmb250ICANCmNv bG9yPSIjMDAwMGZmIj48Zm9udCBmYWNlPSJWZXJkYW5hLCBzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj48YnI+DQoNCg0K PGJyPjwvZm9udD48L2ZvbnQ+PGZvbnQgY29sb3I9IiMwMDAwZmYiPjxmb250IGZhY2U9IlZlcmRh bmEsICANCnNhbnMtc2VyaWYiPjxiPlBTDQpJOiA8L2I+PC9mb250PjwvZm9udD48Zm9udCBjb2xv cj0iIzAwMDBmZiI+PGZvbnQgZmFjZT0iVmVyZGFuYSwgIA0Kc2Fucy1zZXJpZiI+SQ0KYW0gbm90 IHNwYW1taW5nLiBJIGhhdmUgc3R1ZGllZCB5b3VyIHdlYnNpdGUgYW5kIGJlbGlldmUgSSBjYW4g aGVscA0Kd2l0aCB5b3VyIGJ1c2luZXNzIHByb21vdGlvbi4gSWYgeW91IHN0aWxsIHdhbnQgdXMg dG8gbm90IGNvbnRhY3QNCnlvdSwgeW91IGNhbiBpZ25vcmUgdGhpcyBlbWFpbCBvciBhc2sgdG8g cmVtb3ZlIGFuZCBJIHdpbGwgbm90DQpjb250YWN0IGFnYWluLjwvZm9udD48L2ZvbnQ+PC9wPg0K PHAgc3R5bGU9Im1hcmdpbi1ib3R0b206MGNtIj48Zm9udCBjb2xvcj0iIzAwMDBmZiI+PGZvbnQg ZmFjZT0iVmVyZGFuYSwgIA0Kc2Fucy1zZXJpZiI+PGI+UFMNCklJPC9iPjogSSBmb3VuZCB5b3Vy IHNpdGUgdXNpbmcgR29vZ2xlIHNlYXJjaCBhbmQgYWZ0ZXIgaGF2aW5nIGEgbG9vaw0Kb3ZlciB5 b3VyIHdlYnNpdGUgSSByZWNvbW1lbmQgeW91IHRvIGltcGxlbWVudCBmdXR1cmUgdGVjaG5vbG9n aWVzDQpzdWNoIGFzIEhUTUw1IGFuZCBSZXNwb25zaXZlIERlc2lnbiB0byBtYWtlIHlvdXIgc2l0 ZSBtb3JlIGFjY2Vzc2libGUNCmluIG1vYmlsZSBwaG9uZSwgdGFibGV0cywgZGVza3RvcCBldGMu PC9mb250PjwvZm9udD48L3A+DQo8L2Rpdj4NCg== From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 21 10:35:47 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 706EE115 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:35:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpielorz_lst@tdx.co.uk) Received: from mail.tdx.com (mail.tdx.com [62.13.128.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35D5D2EF8 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:35:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk (storm.tdx.co.uk [62.13.130.251]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.tdx.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/) with ESMTP id r7LAZdRr097802 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:35:39 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:35:38 +0100 From: Karl Pielorz To: Arthur Chance Subject: Re: jail.conf ignoring exec.fib? Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <5213A13E.9050307@qeng-ho.org> References: <98486B2D79D00F0898B7C9E6@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> <520B7F0F.7020006@a1poweruser.com> <1960A5B02323B4982B4C0320@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> <520FA592.7010305@qeng-ho.org> <52131A55.2040400@qeng-ho.org> <5213A13E.9050307@qeng-ho.org> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:35:47 -0000 --On 20 August 2013 18:02 +0100 Arthur Chance wrote: > And that's just made me think of something else - I have a horrible > feeling that jexec will attach to the jail using whatever fib it's > running under, i.e. the fib from the host environment. Do you have (or > can you enable) ssh running in the jail? If so, log into the jail that > way, and see what > > sysctl net.my_fibnum > > shows then, because you'll be running under the environment created by > /etc/rc. Ok, one word: Bingo. That was it. I'll spare you the gory details of how I cut myself off from the machine, managed to create a jail with no access etc. etc. But yes, that was it - in summary: jail -c -v Does not actually *show* the fib being set, but will show an error if the setfib call fails. jexec Runs a process in the jail, using the prevailing fib - not the jails fib, you can rectify this by using 'setfib X jexec jail tcsh' I don't know if that last point should be considered a 'bug' or not... Many thanks for your help! -Karl From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 21 11:08:54 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8285AD59 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:08:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B40A2164 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:08:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rufus.webfusion.com (mail.heartinternet.co.uk [79.170.40.31]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r7LB8mS8006102 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:08:49 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@freebsd.org) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk r7LB8mS8006102 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/r7LB8mS8006102; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none (unprotected policy) X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host mail.heartinternet.co.uk [79.170.40.31] claimed to be rufus.webfusion.com Message-ID: <52149FC0.301@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:08:48 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130819 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Way to be announced about security updates and new releases References: <201308210810.33839.freebsd01@dgmm.net> In-Reply-To: <201308210810.33839.freebsd01@dgmm.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.8 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DCC_CHECK, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:08:54 -0000 On 21/08/2013 08:10, dgmm wrote: > On Wednesday 21 August 2013 07:54:06 Antonio Kless wrote: >> Is there any way to be noticed, when security updates or new releases are >> available? >> >> https://twitter.com/freebsd nearly would be a solution, if it did not >> repostquestions from its >> subscribers and other information that is not related to updates. > > Mailing list > Freebsd-announce@freebsd.org Don't forget about securing your ports too. There's several available mechanisms: RSS feed from vuxml.freebsd.org portaudit(1) -- for old style packages pkg audit -- for pkgng-ized systems Cheers, Matthew From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 21 11:35:24 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91515552 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:35:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Received: from blue.qeng-ho.org (blue.qeng-ho.org [217.155.128.241]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 289E42343 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:35:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fileserver.home.qeng-ho.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r7LBZDWt082806; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:35:14 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from freebsd@qeng-ho.org) Message-ID: <5214A5F1.1060405@qeng-ho.org> Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:35:13 +0100 From: Arthur Chance User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130810 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Karl Pielorz Subject: Re: jail.conf ignoring exec.fib? References: <98486B2D79D00F0898B7C9E6@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> <520B7F0F.7020006@a1poweruser.com> <1960A5B02323B4982B4C0320@Mail-PC.tdx.co.uk> <520FA592.7010305@qeng-ho.org> <52131A55.2040400@qeng-ho.org> <5213A13E.9050307@qeng-ho.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:35:24 -0000 On 21/08/2013 11:35, Karl Pielorz wrote: > > > --On 20 August 2013 18:02 +0100 Arthur Chance wrote: > >> And that's just made me think of something else - I have a horrible >> feeling that jexec will attach to the jail using whatever fib it's >> running under, i.e. the fib from the host environment. Do you have (or >> can you enable) ssh running in the jail? If so, log into the jail that >> way, and see what >> >> sysctl net.my_fibnum >> >> shows then, because you'll be running under the environment created by >> /etc/rc. > > Ok, one word: Bingo. That was it. I'll spare you the gory details of how > I cut myself off from the machine, managed to create a jail with no > access etc. etc. > > But yes, that was it - in summary: > > jail -c -v Does not actually *show* the fib being set, but will show > an error if the setfib call fails. > > jexec Runs a process in the jail, using the prevailing fib - not > the jails fib, you can rectify this by using 'setfib X jexec jail tcsh' > > I don't know if that last point should be considered a 'bug' or not... Certainly the jexec problem is going to bite people again and again, so you should probably file a PR for it. As for the -v option, the man page says "Print a message on every operation", so it's down to what is or isn't regarded as an operation worth reporting. > Many thanks for your help! No problem, it helps me understand jails better as well. -- In the dungeons of Mordor, Sauron bred Orcs with LOLcats to create a new race of servants. Called Uruk-Oh-Hai in the Black Speech, they were cruel and delighted in torturing spelling and grammar. _Lord of the Rings 2.0, the Web Edition_ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 21 12:43:43 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 476694B4 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:43:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Olivier.Nicole@cs.ait.ac.th) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.16]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28B9328AE for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:43:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDD9210118B for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 19:36:44 +0700 (ICT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cs.ait.ac.th; h= content-type:content-type:mime-version:message-id:date:date :subject:subject:from:from:received:received:received; s= selector1; t=1377088604; x=1378903005; bh=W74KaH29KKHbbb3SWOsnzV WJprRd+Rxn761fWbFZ26A=; b=C+TyfqtAHV0S/+ww8e46+93x6UY0QxA7xYFfUK 31zhojon3rAuD+Rtoy2NTMV9JOnnPwfUleokt0TQRrHq1cxEFPUA+9rDaRrbLPW9 rdKfoCvOnLsnfLZ2IG1CyUas8ib6aD4VxybJF8Q9AtLeDz4WlfBeCpBWo0Xsq+63 6Yda0= X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at cs.ait.ac.th Received: from mail.cs.ait.ac.th ([127.0.0.1]) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (mail.cs.ait.ac.th [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id jDVMMiyieGyf for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 19:36:44 +0700 (ICT) Received: from banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (banyan.cs.ait.ac.th [192.41.170.5]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.cs.ait.ac.th (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 951B4101185 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 19:36:44 +0700 (ICT) Received: (from on@localhost) by banyan.cs.ait.ac.th (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id r7LCaibi090431; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 19:36:44 +0700 (ICT) (envelope-from on@banyan.cs.ait.ac.th) From: Olivier Nicole To: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Renumber users and groups Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 19:36:44 +0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:43:43 -0000 Hello, On my system legacy users come with UID starting from 200 upward, and all users come with GID lower that 100. I know it's not a good idea, but consider that some accounts are over 20 years old! This is not too much a problem with FreeBSD as I can renumber the few FreeBSD services that have a conflicting ID. But now I want to share the user directories with Mac (10.6). On Mac, any id lower than 512 should be reserved for the system. I tried to renumber the conflicting services on Mac OS, but it messes up the system. So I should renumber my users; it's not very difficult to do, but I have over 1TB of user files for 200 users. Is there a clever/fast way to do that (other than find -exec chown)? What pitfall should I avoid? Best regards, Olivier -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 21 15:19:36 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 882EB9D2 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 15:19:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DFFB2366 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 15:19:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute5.internal (compute5.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.45]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C81E2256E for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:19:34 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213]) by compute5.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:19:34 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:references :subject:date; s=smtpout; bh=gX+86fvD9z8e1HYYpMhuCMCQgDc=; b=UTH fgDKqqFZzZbH4hjwhICD2RZnRjAbD32gScqk3kQI6M3KYND9+Y88gpDhpajC3ulk 19mDmQPWnHBhFzRhCFFGjADyskK2WFWPFmfLjUTG0G6mBAINbwWhNgL+elBG6p46 5MaL4cMg4WVWEf2dTTacGzGPrH8SYC9dVzKJDCJw= Received: by web3.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id 0967CB02388; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:19:34 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1377098373.4728.12478481.06E49ED9@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: J6BeIw3fE1eq/Oy/5oVABSY6B92Cq0jWEOyw8k9Jwgam 1377098373 From: Mark Felder To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-d009844e In-Reply-To: References: Subject: Re: Renumber users and groups Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 10:19:33 -0500 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 15:19:36 -0000 On Wed, Aug 21, 2013, at 7:36, Olivier Nicole wrote: > > Is there a clever/fast way to do that (other than find -exec chown)? > Maybe! I haven't tried this myself yet, but next time I need to do this I think I'm going to take an mtree backup of the entire filesystem, change the UIDs and GIDs (vipw, then vi /etc/groups), and then re-apply the mtree to the entire filesystem. It should find all the files that are now orphaned and fix them to use the new UID/GID that you specified. :) > What pitfall should I avoid? > Not having a backup :) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 21 16:12:36 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 895C62F8 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:12:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk) Received: from bs1.fjl.org.uk (bs1.fjl.org.uk [84.45.41.196]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38D3126E1 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:12:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.35] (mux.fjl.org.uk [62.3.120.246]) (authenticated bits=0) by bs1.fjl.org.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r7LGCRMv013038 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 17:12:28 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk) Message-ID: <5214E6EB.30102@fjl.co.uk> Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 17:12:27 +0100 From: Frank Leonhardt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Renumber users and groups References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:12:36 -0000 On 21/08/2013 13:36, Olivier Nicole wrote: > Hello, > > On my system legacy users come with UID starting from 200 upward, and > all users come with GID lower that 100. > > I know it's not a good idea, but consider that some accounts are over 20 > years old! > > This is not too much a problem with FreeBSD as I can renumber the few > FreeBSD services that have a conflicting ID. > > But now I want to share the user directories with Mac (10.6). On Mac, > any id lower than 512 should be reserved for the system. > > I tried to renumber the conflicting services on Mac OS, but it messes up > the system. > > So I should renumber my users; it's not very difficult to do, but I have > over 1TB of user files for 200 users. > > Is there a clever/fast way to do that (other than find -exec chown)? > > What pitfall should I avoid? > > Best regards, > > Olivier Both tar and rsync are spectacularly clever about this. I've never needed to renumber users, but I've noticed tar will restore a backup across hosts and try to resolve user names correctly. tar stores users and groups symbolically and will happily extract them to the correct numerical ID on the new host. All you need do, therefore, is merge the passwd and group files without conflict and "untar" everything. If you've got to do this in-place it's not going to work, but as you'd be wise to make a backup anyway you may as well make a copy instead, and let it convert them on the fly. rsync seems to pull the same trick. Regards, Frank. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 21 16:36:14 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09B89B6B for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:36:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3B482837 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:36:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute6.internal (compute6.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.46]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB03F22E6A for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:36:11 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213]) by compute6.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:36:11 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:subject:date:in-reply-to :references; s=smtpout; bh=lZ1JY2BafNmXpSxDLsTiWNZsVD4=; b=CLZWB DF3fz6BMN9bbu7CE2xYUxpDEUAYnGmnuPxl4XpiekxYGePQ3J4TQV+DIVa7vDXVo 5EFmcviYgB8mDZieS3Hx799WicXJt7YRv1uR5NcDh6N7E/cck/s8LdldaS4jiggV PZbcCShcNHtZikgfFa9SH4y0U+TKBqx7nYTQEQ= Received: by web3.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id 8BF0FB02387; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:36:11 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1377102971.29516.12511917.7D1FFD58@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: 2Aab9kBjaQbOOlkQLw8WnB+FdQ/6BovvEDYIeB9XTjlW 1377102971 From: Mark Felder To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-d009844e Subject: Re: Renumber users and groups Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:36:11 -0500 In-Reply-To: <5214E6EB.30102@fjl.co.uk> References: <5214E6EB.30102@fjl.co.uk> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:36:14 -0000 On Wed, Aug 21, 2013, at 11:12, Frank Leonhardt wrote: > On 21/08/2013 13:36, Olivier Nicole wrote: > > Hello, > > > > On my system legacy users come with UID starting from 200 upward, and > > all users come with GID lower that 100. > > > > I know it's not a good idea, but consider that some accounts are over 20 > > years old! > > > > This is not too much a problem with FreeBSD as I can renumber the few > > FreeBSD services that have a conflicting ID. > > > > But now I want to share the user directories with Mac (10.6). On Mac, > > any id lower than 512 should be reserved for the system. > > > > I tried to renumber the conflicting services on Mac OS, but it messes up > > the system. > > > > So I should renumber my users; it's not very difficult to do, but I have > > over 1TB of user files for 200 users. > > > > Is there a clever/fast way to do that (other than find -exec chown)? > > > > What pitfall should I avoid? > > > > Best regards, > > > > Olivier > > Both tar and rsync are spectacularly clever about this. I've never > needed to renumber users, but I've noticed tar will restore a backup > across hosts and try to resolve user names correctly. tar stores users > and groups symbolically and will happily extract them to the correct > numerical ID on the new host. All you need do, therefore, is merge the > passwd and group files without conflict and "untar" everything. If > you've got to do this in-place it's not going to work, but as you'd be > wise to make a backup anyway you may as well make a copy instead, and > let it convert them on the fly. rsync seems to pull the same trick. > Those solutions sound pretty handy if I need to move the files at the same time. mtree should do this in-place with minimal fuss as it's just confirming permissions and ownership on all files. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 21 16:48:56 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E08D83FF for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:48:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6382290A for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:48:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.42]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 095D920CCE for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:48:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:48:55 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:references :subject:date; s=smtpout; bh=UMoHgYXlGOiBS3+wASqZOuQIdCg=; b=qXC ltcnWwOOxp/NN6YDVFaOkvEQg4RJWhIV0sHpGksX+V+KYciPIH9lpxMT4JcE/Y// sbKzAfpRKRyobD8gK9rKpN74n2FbhaKWxnuWAi1idkG0NkaVdEWXvpUQ0RuhYbac zQPTjBnqAvs1hA+Dipb+FNPp4QdlT1ZCiJL3Kbdc= Received: by web3.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id D7F68B02387; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:48:54 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1377103734.1265.12517189.74648DF1@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: gc2mZMnwTKyBzw4zxhYf85Bm1Pu2b9z0xPOLlxF/Cyp3 1377103734 From: Mark Felder To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-d009844e In-Reply-To: <1377102971.29516.12511917.7D1FFD58@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <5214E6EB.30102@fjl.co.uk> <1377102971.29516.12511917.7D1FFD58@webmail.messagingengine.com> Subject: Re: Renumber users and groups Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 11:48:54 -0500 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:48:56 -0000 On Wed, Aug 21, 2013, at 11:36, Mark Felder wrote: > > Those solutions sound pretty handy if I need to move the files at the > same time. mtree should do this in-place with minimal fuss as it's just > confirming permissions and ownership on all files. > I also just thought of an idea I need to benchmark: running mtree with and without nscd. I bet nscd could speed it up a lot. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 21 20:38:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49A1BE96; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 20:38:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from varanasisai@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ve0-x232.google.com (mail-ve0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7C6C2918; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 20:38:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ve0-f178.google.com with SMTP id ox1so840155veb.9 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:38:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=huNHhqwSb57k5L4AoYRPJz5lMVvmbdFSnMy4kHSwt1s=; b=dA2/W3yx3VW8nVde06NqbBNr77aWzProDVQb35nqql6jE2d2Rk5GgPvqruTkD687MD xMkla59Axbiz2um67p59MX3FntQQWUhIPztlpBoYwcbv9pXmlatUloGzdOvXLtjncTe3 CSkMfkXEygGQ+AIYROjKljReyFGL65C5E4fHnZxcCBPXhT1aOOV2RkA+f/FkAlUhzCvH gN9WP76KopoB/KnagCWSFLAX76/4w0s0+vxEMSMlT1xfOUJ1XjsRrvLdWgyyzNrckHtR NwDVEKq/AeuisosWdR6e416i/S/YVG97uIdl4IgbzbiQwJhZbjOvdZgwRvpfnisef31S GRrw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.237.208 with SMTP id kp16mr7991332vcb.4.1377117480865; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:38:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.233.4 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 13:38:00 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <503E443D-BC48-4284-8FC4-22B0A50DF147@bsdimp.com> References: <503E443D-BC48-4284-8FC4-22B0A50DF147@bsdimp.com> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 02:08:00 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: UUID in fstab. From: varanasi sainath To: Warner Losh Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, freebsd-drivers@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 20:38:02 -0000 Thanks for the support. I want to use the uuid's found using sysctl -a in fstab. /dev/gptid/ has only uuid for boot partition. Cheers Sainath On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Warner Losh wrote: > /dev/gptid/$UID > > maybe what you are looking for? > > Warner > > On Aug 21, 2013, at 12:16 AM, varanasi sainath wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > How to find UUID's for Disk volumes. > > > > I have used sysctl -a | grep uuid and was able to find > > freebsd-swap > > b55ff220-dcdd-11e2-a324-00155d55b20c > > > > freebsd-ufs > > b55762fc-dcdd-11e2-a324-00155d55b20c > > > > are these the corresponding UUID's for swap and ufs. > > > > I din't find /dev/ufsid folder to get the UUID's > > > > I have used glabel and was able to create labels, system boots well, > > everything works fine but I don't want to use labels (operating > constraint: > > to create labels I have to boot into single user mode, is there a way to > > create labels on mounted partitions (I hope not)). > > > > I found gptid folder which has boot UUID can this be used? > > > > How to use UUID's in fstab? > > > > I have tried using > > # Device Mountpoint FStype Options Dump > > Pass# > > uuid=b55762fc-dcdd-11e2-a324-00155d55b20c / ufs rw 1 1 > > > > that din't work. > > > > I found (from a post) /dev/ufsid/ should be used in fstab but I > don't > > see ufsid in /dev. Do we need to create this or does the system does it? > > > > Note: > > Using FreeBSD 9.1. created partitions using the guided partition tool. > > > > Reason: using a SCSI storage driver which changes the drive name > > accordingly but freebsd installer (boot) is unable to find the drives > which > > results in boot failure. > > > > Thanks, > > Sainath.* > > * > > * > > * > > *"Learning is the key to excellence".* > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-drivers@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-drivers > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-drivers-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > -- Sainath Varanasi Hyderabad 09000855250 *My Website : http://s21embedded.webs.com **Linked In Profile : http://in.linkedin.com/pub/sainathvaranasi .. .. * From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 21 23:04:54 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62FDE6C5 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 23:04:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alexus@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-x22c.google.com (mail-ob0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12AB82514 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 23:04:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f172.google.com with SMTP id er7so2150161obc.31 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:04:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=iIudD1HzYmfqoTU5j4nOi2UE52xZaOMialVre1zEP0Y=; b=Vy/R8DoonDR5EiDTaQ863HAOnY1kgdtA4/r/lm7x9uK9p53SWnj/U2UtWlvwpbeH4Z D10hSgnuhaSxbo/UEs+rbj1l0DcJ0wcdzBiUUiS2XCXVtT7f7TpnzVaN52aHSvubhI9K CMEJHK11UZjiA56W/oSDbaz5/xrGDhTeHDicBM+MoB0mk/3JRRfi9LR9kGlAvvd1HF1z VQDo7tt9l6KLy/MZ+nTT2IGsE3NgyDRoLquqJvoxkNBnfxSFw+TdLFyajiJiOPeRzwAQ Hjk+Rufl1bv+H7Efb6dmuaq5emZ+6+9H5oYjtyyaWhlOT2pBt0GYDa0AWiu17Ug7c6sk DmxA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.227.136 with SMTP id sa8mr10905966obc.39.1377126293425; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:04:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.76.167.133 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:04:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 19:04:53 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring From: alexus To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 23:04:54 -0000 I just update snort (using portmaster -PP snort) and now I'm getting this: # pkg_info | grep ^snort pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring pkg_info: corrupted record for package snort-2.9.3.1 (pkgdep line without argument), ignoring snort-2.9.3.1 Lightweight network intrusion detection system # any ideas how to address it? thanks in advance! -- http://alexus.org/ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 21 23:17:47 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF9FEBAD for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 23:17:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 3mUoVUg4JERo74BB4DJEB14HJS6C08B.2EC5H441I3-GK4IJ8EDI5H441I3.EH6@calendar-server.bounces.google.com) Received: from mail-vc0-x24a.google.com (mail-vc0-x24a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::24a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A607D25D0 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 23:17:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f202.google.com with SMTP id gd11so125305vcb.3 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:17:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:auto-submitted:message-id:date:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=KnWFMh0pKmCzMekAlCTw4r6azW6Lje5Ou+Dq/EBaZBQ=; b=nPnGB17NjzJm3QYOraw4l4vP3gT8AV1RFen958RBPHSqleUEcTPgKEW+rHEw5kmuAU 0JerB//AFyBfZ0r5dt4QQEJ3yucvCLJ4EYwlEh4nr7FgTQ0NV8BtF3wlM5vUqGqFHB6K 734OkqA2WInpK3Y3fo7TGndgqipArsMBc7StLWBTbIzl/aR9Yd/5ny+W9G9giE4bMhsZ /r6+no7gpV5X4WwSf6CboskIlKOxnzho/Fj8r1QGrJZnKhBAWCkH1Zl1p0ak3t/uDpp+ +cVluY64rARTWPOi4hc6fPXIafzYU5GcwtUVF9J87vqxRrqFlww1YlE0dRY0knv3uV4p dUog== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:auto-submitted:message-id:date:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=KnWFMh0pKmCzMekAlCTw4r6azW6Lje5Ou+Dq/EBaZBQ=; b=U22W5+Nk8WJGg+PPsK0qJDaEFA6+LBnyMFXyoXPhLNvbZe1y0IC/tqrUSS5fnvxeoG HZarE8aIhy28aLW4RcIzOe9BpiOuURGX+i25KS9u3QQ09obgWBpLRirXEL9Wqgr6ifHF cpg6jhLl2kdz1wnMVopIaXqzDU4B4xvDevL4oZuV3cwsdHG7lBDusiWfhbk6mHuaStuU rwb2X1YwXlbvnySFv2BN8sJA4jyX3wpJVFxZ1aGd4J5P87j0kRILQzBzm17fGx6BenYE Mfrbayt9kg5sQ14VvMHRRwI66vcU4FpJRS8zCvApz1v5OIFp9YJYIGnTtaxOXAKV4zU2 qmRQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.230.194 with SMTP id ta2mr782296vdc.1.1377127065275; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:17:45 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Google Calendar Auto-Submitted: auto-generated Message-ID: <089e0117667589536e04e47d6171@google.com> Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 23:17:45 +0000 Subject: Invitation: Hello dear @ Wed Aug 21, 2013 7:30pm - 8:30pm (hellentolbert2@gmail.com) From: Miss Hellen Tolbert To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=089e0117667589536304e47d6170 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Miss Hellen Tolbert List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 23:17:47 -0000 --089e0117667589536304e47d6170 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 WW91IGhhdmUgYmVlbiBpbnZpdGVkIHRvIHRoZSBmb2xsb3dpbmcgZXZlbnQuDQoNClRpdGxlOiBI ZWxsbyBkZWFyDQpIZWxsbywNCg0KTXkgbmFtZSBpcyBNaXNzIEhlbGxlbiBUb2xiZXJ0LCBJdCBn aXZlIG1lIGEgZ3JlYXQgcGxlYXN1cmUgdG8gd3JpdGUgeW91LiBJICANCndhcyBicm93c2luZyB3 aGVuIGkgY2FtZSBhY3Jvc3MgeW91ciBlbWFpbCBhbmQgSSB3YXMgYXR0cmFjdGVkIHRvIHdyaXRl IHRvICANCnlvdSBzbyB0aGF0IHdlIGNhbiBiZSBmcmllbmRzIGlmIHlvdSB3aWxsIGhhdmUgdGhl IGRlc2lyZSBhcyBtZS4gaSB3aWxsIGJlICANCnZlcnkgaGFwcHkgdG8gYmUgaW4gY29tbXVuaWNh dGlvbiB3aXRoIHlvdSBzbyB0aGF0IHdlIGNhbiBnZXQgdG8ga25vdyBlYWNoICANCm90aGVyIGJl dHRlciBhbmQgc2VlIHdoYXQgaGFwcGVucyBpbiBmdXR1cmUuIEkgd2lsbCBsaWtlIHlvdSB0byBy ZXBseSB0byBteSAgDQplbWFpbCAoaGVsbGVudG9sYmFydEB5bWFpbC5jb20pIHNvIHRoYXQgaSBj YW4gdGVsbCB5b3UgbW9yZSBhYm91dCBteSBzZWxmICANCmFuZCBnaXZlIHlvdSBteSBwaWN0dXJl cy4gSSB3aWxsIGJlIHdhaXRpbmcgdG8gaGVhciBmcm9tIHlvdS4gSGF2ZSBhICANCmJsZXNzZWQg ZGF5Lg0KDQpUaGFua3MNCk1pc3MgSGVsbGVuIFRvbGJlcnQuDQpXaGVuOiBXZWQgQXVnIDIxLCAy MDEzIDc6MzBwbSCWIDg6MzBwbSBFYXN0ZXJuIFRpbWUNCkNhbGVuZGFyOiBoZWxsZW50b2xiZXJ0 MkBnbWFpbC5jb20NCldobzoNCiAgICAgKEd1ZXN0IGxpc3QgaXMgdG9vIGxhcmdlIHRvIGRpc3Bs YXkpDQoNCkV2ZW50IGRldGFpbHM6ICANCmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lmdvb2dsZS5jb20vY2FsZW5kYXIv ZXZlbnQ/YWN0aW9uPVZJRVcmZWlkPWFteGxjR2QwWVc0d2RtZ3daSEYwYjI1bWNEWjJjelp2Tkc4 Z1puSmxaV0p6WkMxeGRXVnpkR2x2Ym5OQVpuSmxaV0p6WkM1dmNtYyZ0b2s9TWpRamFHVnNiR1Z1 ZEc5c1ltVnlkREpBWjIxaGFXd3VZMjl0TURjNFpqRXhPREF4TVRGaVpXWTJNR1EzTmpnMk5tTm1N emswWVRGbU56UTJORGt5TURVNU5BJmN0ej1BbWVyaWNhL05ld19Zb3JrJmhsPWVuDQoNCkludml0 YXRpb24gZnJvbSBHb29nbGUgQ2FsZW5kYXI6IGh0dHBzOi8vd3d3Lmdvb2dsZS5jb20vY2FsZW5k YXIvDQoNCllvdSBhcmUgcmVjZWl2aW5nIHRoaXMgY291cnRlc3kgZW1haWwgYXQgdGhlIGFjY291 bnQgIA0KZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmcgYmVjYXVzZSB5b3UgYXJlIGFuIGF0 dGVuZGVlIG9mIHRoaXMgZXZlbnQuDQoNClRvIHN0b3AgcmVjZWl2aW5nIGZ1dHVyZSBub3RpZmlj YXRpb25zIGZvciB0aGlzIGV2ZW50LCBkZWNsaW5lIHRoaXMgZXZlbnQuICANCkFsdGVybmF0aXZl bHkgeW91IGNhbiBzaWduIHVwIGZvciBhIEdvb2dsZSBhY2NvdW50IGF0ICANCmh0dHBzOi8vd3d3 Lmdvb2dsZS5jb20vY2FsZW5kYXIvIGFuZCBjb250cm9sIHlvdXIgbm90aWZpY2F0aW9uIHNldHRp bmdzIGZvciAgDQp5b3VyIGVudGlyZSBjYWxlbmRhci4NCg== --089e0117667589536304e47d6170-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 21 23:23:56 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B05A3FBF for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 23:23:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lumiwa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qa0-x236.google.com (mail-qa0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7110B2644 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 23:23:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id bv4so799156qab.20 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:23:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=BI90jYO272T2eEeYiREWkpocv9ErDGSzkOrJ1LDTG30=; b=kQf4h48sUWNzHCCqg+l42X/JLx4ntXzDCVopRaO48vqMtdrLgCfIYeP0K05vlrUDIg 7xRJGsp9G15IkvoVsL+PLnKfL+Qoe0aFGJGLMO9ONM7R6fFenpZKjZJILTpFkkZFOOab 8f6m9Zn6lQ4TrN4XQVcJolp3HTY/NmniWSEBeFbKA4g+xoT0xm2VcPoC5fqieDo5o4yO 8LAV7nteL1ZyaRt9B22y5EECAuwPBm1+Q5klAf6YDdcUrea/FY4VUOl8X6Vp3Ku/6j28 ZUb7KMFPSLMrlzAk6doWBmcCir9FAhdmptsVem4sH1F6k+QEm+Z4v/TmH0egAJxLNPSN HVZg== X-Received: by 10.224.62.15 with SMTP id v15mr5694167qah.94.1377127435575; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:23:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.254] (pool-64-223-171-164.man.east.myfairpoint.net. [64.223.171.164]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id m10sm14180608qae.12.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:23:54 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.2 From: ajtiM In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 19:23:53 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <486ACECC-518D-4F31-8765-1C2F1356D770@gmail.com> References: To: Doug Hardie X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 23:23:56 -0000 http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=3D1619404 It is helpful too=85 On Aug 15, 2013, at 4:14 PM, Doug Hardie wrote: >=20 > On 15 August 2013, at 06:37, ajtiM wrote: >=20 >>=20 >> How will be ATI supported in FreeBSD 9.2, please? I like bluetooth = mouse. Is it supported? >>=20 >> I try Linux Mint and it works perfect. I am downloading live CD for = NetBSD (jibbed) and I will see how is works but I like to install = FreeBSD (not double boot, just FreeBSD). >>=20 >=20 > See: = http://docs.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?28915479-B712-4ED0-A041-B75F2F59FECA >=20 > Thats not a complete answer as I don't use any of the user interface = stuff. However, it will give a starting point for you. I have updated = my two newest minis to run 9.2 (latest candidate). >=20 >=20 Mitja ---- http://www.redbubble.com/people/lumiwa From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 21 23:34:13 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0EB6527 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 23:34:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from zoom.lafn.org (zoom.lafn.org [108.92.93.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9094A26E7 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 23:34:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.1.3] (static-71-177-216-148.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [71.177.216.148]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoom.lafn.org (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r7LNY64C012991 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:34:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) From: Doug Hardie Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: dig Message-Id: Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 16:34:06 -0700 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97 at zoom.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 23:34:13 -0000 There appears to be a problem with dig and the +trace option in 9.2. I = believe its also in 9.1. The command: dig freebsd.org +trace Only yields a dumb response. No useful information is provided. = Running the same command on FreeBSD 7.2 yields a complete trace with = lots of useful information.= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 21 23:46:27 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27929777 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 23:46:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk) Received: from bs1.fjl.org.uk (bs1.fjl.org.uk [84.45.41.196]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE8632770 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 23:46:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.35] (mux.fjl.org.uk [62.3.120.246]) (authenticated bits=0) by bs1.fjl.org.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r7LNkMxK007988 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:46:23 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk) Message-ID: <5215514F.4030303@fjl.co.uk> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:46:23 +0100 From: Frank Leonhardt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dig References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 23:46:27 -0000 On 22/08/2013 00:34, Doug Hardie wrote: > There appears to be a problem with dig and the +trace option in 9.2. I believe its also in 9.1. The command: > > dig freebsd.org +trace > > Only yields a dumb response. No useful information is provided. Running the same command on FreeBSD 7.2 yields a complete trace with lots of useful information. > _______________________________________________ > Works for me on 9.0 and 9.1 (and 8.2, 7.1, 7.0) Is there something wrong with your local bind configuration? Regards, Frank. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 22 00:03:39 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D561AA1 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:03:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from zoom.lafn.org (zoom.lafn.org [108.92.93.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 048B8284F for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:03:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.1.3] (static-71-177-216-148.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [71.177.216.148]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoom.lafn.org (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r7M03Z5a013747 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 21 Aug 2013 17:03:35 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) Subject: Re: dig From: Doug Hardie In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 17:03:35 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <44733A0D-5BAD-43B9-B154-554A35260089@lafn.org> References: <5215514F.4030303@fjl.co.uk> To: Frank Leonhardt X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97 at zoom.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:03:39 -0000 On 21 August 2013, at 17:02, Doug Hardie wrote: >=20 > On 21 August 2013, at 16:46, Frank Leonhardt wrote: >=20 >> On 22/08/2013 00:34, Doug Hardie wrote: >>> There appears to be a problem with dig and the +trace option in 9.2. = I believe its also in 9.1. The command: >>>=20 >>> dig freebsd.org +trace >>>=20 >>> Only yields a dumb response. No useful information is provided. = Running the same command on FreeBSD 7.2 yields a complete trace with = lots of useful information. >>> _______________________________________________ >>>=20 >>=20 >> Works for me on 9.0 and 9.1 (and 8.2, 7.1, 7.0) >>=20 >> Is there something wrong with your local bind configuration? >>=20 >> Regards, Frank. >=20 > No. The 7.2 config is identical to the 9.1 and there is no bind = running on the 9.2. >=20 >=20 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 22 00:18:25 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E12FD8B for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:18:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roberthuff@rcn.com) Received: from smtp.rcn.com (smtp.rcn.com [69.168.97.78]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2699A28F7 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:18:24 +0000 (UTC) X_CMAE_Category: 0,0 Undefined,Undefined X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=IO07VGfG c=1 sm=0 tr=0 a=nVny9ETX7T5uMhI2oTVyRA==:117 a=nVny9ETX7T5uMhI2oTVyRA==:17 a=K-v-2zaBAAAA:8 a=AaUjGI9IrlcA:10 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=OA2lqS22AAAA:8 a=sIt-5M63AAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=JBzNTG_3wsw5HM8wvNEA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=fgf5PR_cwQYA:10 X-CM-Score: 0 X-Scanned-by: Cloudmark Authority Engine Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com smtp.mail=roberthuff@rcn.com; spf=neutral; sender-id=neutral Authentication-Results: smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com header.from=roberthuff@rcn.com; sender-id=neutral Received-SPF: neutral (smtp01.rcn.cmh.synacor.com: 209.6.193.164 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of rcn.com) Received: from [209.6.193.164] ([209.6.193.164:65365] helo=jerusalem.litteratus.org.litteratus.org) by smtp.rcn.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.49 r(42060/42061)) with ESMTP id 67/41-04066-FC855125; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 20:18:23 -0400 From: Robert Huff MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <21013.22734.758240.668671@jerusalem.litteratus.org> Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2013 20:18:22 -0400 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dig In-Reply-To: <5215514F.4030303@fjl.co.uk> References: <5215514F.4030303@fjl.co.uk> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.4 (patch 22) "Instant Classic" XEmacs Lucid X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:18:25 -0000 > > There appears to be a problem with dig and the +trace option in > > 9.2. I believe its also in 9.1. The command: > > > > dig freebsd.org +trace > > > > Only yields a dumb response. No useful information is > provided. Running the same command on FreeBSD 7.2 yields a > complete trace with lots of useful information. > > Works for me on 9.0 and 9.1 (and 8.2, 7.1, 7.0) And on: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT #0 r248938: Sun Mar 31 06:24:42 EDT 2013 amd64 Robert Huff From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 22 01:15:07 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74D58D63 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 01:15:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from colin@restecp.com) Received: from max.restecp.com (max.restecp.com [IPv6:2a01:4f8:d13:e00::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 184E32BAD for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 01:15:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from max.restecp.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by max.restecp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 654B32C90AA; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 01:14:58 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=restecp.com; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=dkim; bh=KNAH91DN0AM9 iN4Fito4rseU6BI=; b=nY+chwedLhmcyYCMiHwFriPGmeoecgfEMvk7BoSTeJMH DLqpGz/M12WosPGTnVyhYyFor2QoQ90A6e+pzVNE6khDcFgYrN+qbP/k9gJV05f2 CHEa0spvPB9oy14O/VIyz7lQURMDqH01cSuh5BS7Xfe1n2UFTjchlAFydVKkvl+5 ePLG7++bzfLyEfQjaP/ZAqHi1MSR7ZbbH4mvS21eNzGY9Lxo8CE6+3sQzWWpXkey pCOFvI3xKc/ULAv99KlagiILBSB8CGTMHphKDdCPz8CKh9s6CwvQRCg+aDoXYa5A sG2xI8y5VM5hrUg4IiT6vouUgElhMfDsYEw4p3On7g== DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=restecp.com; h=message-id :date:from:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=dkim; b=gT/Q+G k4jg8Zcz67B9qmnGvlGIoLZJE5IVCp8xsqQhPa0jPrIVyWj1/eWtnZotQ9f0vhzv 3YEeBIu38aaj8X1GSHMMdTy9T7rd5yCI2bfVFSeUCmc5W1rx3qycUujagB4e+EK5 mfxSZJ4rsKwWm+kxbQciNKqzjSutrSBhRNotKoicQgwL8JjS0v1qYYcaVk+AXCWu XiA7LiCoWMNb6N11EppZxczAILq7Pw3sR+3lBp/ujkjOqz27P/pmidm55C5t4rjq aRsqpS/jwW2IWsfvzG1lLY8uMBa5PpUVl9CbKXS++rlUFLUE+rNkyZXgnU68EFPd vnUL3YzmaYOcHB3g== Received: from [172.30.42.66] (c220-237-77-150.fitzg4.qld.optusnet.com.au [220.237.77.150]) by max.restecp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EB0972C908E; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 01:14:45 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <521565DC.7040501@restecp.com> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:14:04 +1000 From: Colin House User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Doug Hardie Subject: Re: dig References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 01:15:07 -0000 On 22/08/2013 9:34 AM, Doug Hardie wrote: > There appears to be a problem with dig and the +trace option in 9.2. I believe its also in 9.1. The command: > > dig freebsd.org +trace > > Only yields a dumb response. No useful information is provided. Running the same command on FreeBSD 7.2 yields a complete trace with lots of useful information. Have you tested against another NS? I ran into a similar problem when setting up unbound as a local recursor recently on a 9.1-STABLE (r251985) box. dig +trace would return (next to) nothing. dig +trace @8.8.8.8 worked as expected. I found it was the access-control configuration of unbound. Changing my "access-control: ::1 allow" to "access-control: ::1 allow_snoop" restored the +trace functionality. I'm not sure how this translates with bind.. Perhaps the defaults have changed between the versions that you're running (if you're running the base versions on 7.2 and 9.1) or your recursive server isn't allowing it on 9.2? Fwiw, in unbound, "allow" allows recursive lookups, "allow_snoop" allows both recursive and non-recursive lookups. - Col From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 22 05:32:48 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04A9D4E6; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 05:32:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from olivier2553@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qa0-x22a.google.com (mail-qa0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9BD42E79; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 05:32:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f42.google.com with SMTP id bv4so111082qab.1 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 22:32:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=DspR+HzIrLzbcHWDgJRqalkmqhEmSrXeqkgLICFfBn0=; b=e4h1RErbgx0tSXWJmQkS1pRjPS2ZQdbM8xoqmt9doSipysJuys3B4WpE5pkPTYuf5o OSgktlWgCAt4iuymRCjFvVt/NRhptlEdTzvLqmKAaTu+3i+dpwJQuof7FPrLZpdQd3c6 00QYKlV0ErEU+PuGCvvtepAr1j9R9isbEz8+FBovPSLykLlOjsV1qiuS5UU2oOSmutmh jiwynlDAOEimcaRXLusSDch4bcaIQ/IShS8SyxgtxZo4l7wFaiSEyZJoCKcdwABAuoUp I+MHAmcwn0UgkKlA0W1W1/hjhemcj10efyzZOborscfTRELkDKdSxpB91NLWh/XZmQI2 mlvQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.7.67 with SMTP id c3mr15251640qac.6.1377149566834; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 22:32:46 -0700 (PDT) Sender: olivier2553@gmail.com Received: by 10.49.62.41 with HTTP; Wed, 21 Aug 2013 22:32:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1377103734.1265.12517189.74648DF1@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <5214E6EB.30102@fjl.co.uk> <1377102971.29516.12511917.7D1FFD58@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1377103734.1265.12517189.74648DF1@webmail.messagingengine.com> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:32:46 +0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: u3WDgMlUo-J7HfqwU9YUuT7IMtk Message-ID: Subject: Re: Renumber users and groups From: Olivier Nicole To: Mark Felder Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 05:32:48 -0000 Thank you, >> Those solutions sound pretty handy if I need to move the files at the >> same time. mtree should do this in-place with minimal fuss as it's just >> confirming permissions and ownership on all files. > I also just thought of an idea I need to benchmark: running mtree with > and without nscd. I bet nscd could speed it up a lot. I did try mtree on my own files, counting for 20% of the total size, and it took only seconds. I bet other users may have many more smaller files, but it's all a matter of minutes, so it is fast enough. Best regards, Olivier From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 22 06:37:39 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2452A54 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 06:37:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from a_mungse@rediffmail.com) Received: from rediffmail.com (f5mail-224-130.rediffmail.com [114.31.224.130]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C00D821F7 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 06:37:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13624 invoked by uid 510); 22 Aug 2013 06:30:48 -0000 Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=redf; d=rediffmail.com; b=hfW3+VHq5wBvHNO5gKOvuD91dbSrJkmzkbsrXl/xLp8on1UIi3IhX4xkZANE+3ImQmn8KP4MuYQlzsj+OHqbT0N+PZisDyclt7N4kxLHUDNE3vRYUDmFYxkW6eNbG53AW2qDzHEax9LVnc7S8z7nb//Dyw8O+RTXNdvyLlRQV+g= ; x-m-msg: asd54ad564ad7aa6sd5as6d5; a6da7d6asas6dasd77; 5dad65ad5sd; X-CTCH-Spam: Unknown X-CTCH-VOD: Unknown X-CTCH-Flags: : 0 X-CTCH-RefID: str=0001.0A15020A.5215B018.0087,ss=1,re=0.000,fgs=0 X-REDF-OSEN: a_mungse@rediffmail.com Date: 22 Aug 2013 06:30:47 -0000 Message-ID: <20130822063047.13583.qmail@f5mail-224-130.rediffmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Received: from unknown 1.186.109.179 by rediffmail.com via HTTP; 22 Aug 2013 06:30:47 -0000 Sender: a_mungse@rediffmail.com Subject: =?utf-8?B?SGVsbG8gZnJlZWJzZHF1ZXN0aW9ucw==?= From: "amar" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 06:37:39 -0000 Hello freebsdquestions i havent seen anything work as well as this on the first try http://bitly.com/13C7n5L quit your nine to five in three weeks or less guaranteed From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 22 07:45:44 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 453D7250 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 07:45:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martinhoover6@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oa0-x248.google.com (mail-oa0-x248.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::248]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A61925D9 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 07:45:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f72.google.com with SMTP id i4so352725oah.7 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:45:43 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Zn/WsNwDoL7cDxxMF3f30GVYn95wCsfYU0D63C9QLAw=; b=fJfzBhvRrWgviusmQzZG2xyo5HPrVy1Caiq69ttU9ABaoolL4GHW52MMiKDH2qLKS0 lsCjY/01q8+y0rXtts+yFMBzvrHS4Go2CrnfVjDzKbDS3HyzKa7UaHUG2rgtkTSih2v4 jvv6PxIowAh3LR+QMEixIZeia9YIuG6HBkJb+EbFdjXYfqgnBBy9wgpb/YetZgbpJ+ca dITco0X2tfIsYB3OQrbhBORdCO2xR0rrmHHl43os5VWBDfo3eRoeNkbNTszBGytn/fpu 7asgXtHMejWqKfCO8OX1VnX/iXT9q7/b5XFQ3rY/1YyKSP8W7Y5e8yh8BhuehXn+ffsg XJIg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.105.206 with SMTP id w14mr6467412ico.26.1377157542979; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 00:45:42 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20cf3022410d262ccc04e4847ab1@google.com> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 07:45:42 +0000 Subject: Organic SEO: Freebsd.Org : MT From: Masha Lockwood To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 07:45:44 -0000 PGRpdiBkaXI9Imx0ciI+PHAgIA0Kc3R5bGU9ImNvbG9yOnJnYigzNCwzNCwzNCk7Zm9udC1mYW1p bHk6YXJpYWw7Zm9udC1zaXplOnNtYWxsO2ZvbnQtc3R5bGU6bm9ybWFsO2ZvbnQtdmFyaWFudDpu b3JtYWw7Zm9udC13ZWlnaHQ6bm9ybWFsO2xldHRlci1zcGFjaW5nOm5vcm1hbDtsaW5lLWhlaWdo dDpub3JtYWw7dGV4dC1hbGlnbjpzdGFydDt0ZXh0LWluZGVudDowcHg7dGV4dC10cmFuc2Zvcm06 bm9uZTt3aGl0ZS1zcGFjZTpub3JtYWw7d29yZC1zcGFjaW5nOjBweCI+DQo8c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0i Zm9udC1zaXplOjE0cHQiPkRlYXIgRnJlZWJzZC5PcmcgVGVhbSw8L3NwYW4+PC9wPjxwICANCnN0 eWxlPSJjb2xvcjpyZ2IoMzQsMzQsMzQpO2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OmFyaWFsO2ZvbnQtc2l6ZTpzbWFs bDtmb250LXN0eWxlOm5vcm1hbDtmb250LXZhcmlhbnQ6bm9ybWFsO2ZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0Om5vcm1h bDtsZXR0ZXItc3BhY2luZzpub3JtYWw7bGluZS1oZWlnaHQ6bm9ybWFsO3RleHQtYWxpZ246c3Rh cnQ7dGV4dC1pbmRlbnQ6MHB4O3RleHQtdHJhbnNmb3JtOm5vbmU7d2hpdGUtc3BhY2U6bm9ybWFs O3dvcmQtc3BhY2luZzowcHgiPg0KPHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxNHB0Ij5JIHRob3Vn aHQgeW91IG1pZ2h0IGxpa2UgdG8ga25vdyBzb21lIG9mIHRoZSAgDQpyZWFzb25zIHdoeSB5b3Ug YXJlIG5vdCBnZXR0aW5nIGVub3VnaCBPcmdhbmljIHNlYXJjaCBhbmQgZW5naW5lIFNvY2lhbCAg DQpNZWRpYSB0cmFmZmljIGZvcjxzcGFuPqA8L3NwYW4+PHNwYW4+RnJlZWJzZC5Pcmc8Yj4uPC9i Pjwvc3Bhbj48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgIA0Kc3R5bGU9ImNvbG9yOnJnYigzNCwzNCwzNCk7Zm9u dC1mYW1pbHk6YXJpYWw7Zm9udC1zaXplOnNtYWxsO2ZvbnQtc3R5bGU6bm9ybWFsO2ZvbnQtdmFy aWFudDpub3JtYWw7Zm9udC13ZWlnaHQ6bm9ybWFsO2xldHRlci1zcGFjaW5nOm5vcm1hbDtsaW5l LWhlaWdodDpub3JtYWw7dGV4dC1hbGlnbjpzdGFydDt0ZXh0LWluZGVudDowcHg7dGV4dC10cmFu c2Zvcm06bm9uZTt3aGl0ZS1zcGFjZTpub3JtYWw7d29yZC1zcGFjaW5nOjBweDttYXJnaW4tbGVm dDowLjVpbiI+DQo8c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjE0cHQiPjxzcGFuPjEuPHNwYW4gIA0K c3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc3R5bGU6bm9ybWFsO2ZvbnQtdmFyaWFudDpub3JtYWw7Zm9udC13ZWlnaHQ6 bm9ybWFsO2ZvbnQtc2l6ZTo3cHQ7bGluZS1oZWlnaHQ6bm9ybWFsO2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OiYjMzk7 VGltZXMgIA0KTmV3IFJvbWFuJiMzOTsiPqCgoKA8c3Bhbj6gPC9zcGFuPjwvc3Bhbj48L3NwYW4+ PC9zcGFuPjxzcGFuICANCnN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTRwdCI+WW91ciB3ZWJzaXRlIEZyZWVi c2QuT3JnIGlzIG5vdCByYW5raW5nIHRvcCBpbiAgDQpHb29nbGUgb3JnYW5pYyBzZWFyY2ggZm9y IG1hbnkgY29tcGV0aXRpdmUga2V5d29yZHMuPC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCjxwICANCnN0eWxlPSJjb2xv cjpyZ2IoMzQsMzQsMzQpO2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OmFyaWFsO2ZvbnQtc2l6ZTpzbWFsbDtmb250LXN0 eWxlOm5vcm1hbDtmb250LXZhcmlhbnQ6bm9ybWFsO2ZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0Om5vcm1hbDtsZXR0ZXIt c3BhY2luZzpub3JtYWw7bGluZS1oZWlnaHQ6bm9ybWFsO3RleHQtYWxpZ246c3RhcnQ7dGV4dC1p bmRlbnQ6MHB4O3RleHQtdHJhbnNmb3JtOm5vbmU7d2hpdGUtc3BhY2U6bm9ybWFsO3dvcmQtc3Bh Y2luZzowcHg7bWFyZ2luLWxlZnQ6MC41aW4iPg0KPHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxNHB0 Ij48c3Bhbj4yLjxzcGFuICANCnN0eWxlPSJmb250LXN0eWxlOm5vcm1hbDtmb250LXZhcmlhbnQ6 bm9ybWFsO2ZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0Om5vcm1hbDtmb250LXNpemU6N3B0O2xpbmUtaGVpZ2h0Om5vcm1h bDtmb250LWZhbWlseTomIzM5O1RpbWVzICANCk5ldyBSb21hbiYjMzk7Ij6goKCgPHNwYW4+oDwv c3Bhbj48L3NwYW4+PC9zcGFuPjwvc3Bhbj48c3BhbiAgDQpzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjE0cHQi PllvdXIgd2Vic2l0ZSBwcm9maWxlIG5lZWRzIHRvIGhhdmUgcmVndWxhciB1cGRhdGUgaW4gIA0K bWFqb3IgU29jaWFsIE1lZGlhIHNpdGVzLjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCAgDQpzdHlsZT0iY29sb3I6 cmdiKDM0LDM0LDM0KTtmb250LWZhbWlseTphcmlhbDtmb250LXNpemU6c21hbGw7Zm9udC1zdHls ZTpub3JtYWw7Zm9udC12YXJpYW50Om5vcm1hbDtmb250LXdlaWdodDpub3JtYWw7bGV0dGVyLXNw YWNpbmc6bm9ybWFsO2xpbmUtaGVpZ2h0Om5vcm1hbDt0ZXh0LWFsaWduOnN0YXJ0O3RleHQtaW5k ZW50OjBweDt0ZXh0LXRyYW5zZm9ybTpub25lO3doaXRlLXNwYWNlOm5vcm1hbDt3b3JkLXNwYWNp bmc6MHB4O21hcmdpbi1sZWZ0OjAuNWluIj4NCjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTRwdCI+ PHNwYW4+My48c3BhbiAgDQpzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zdHlsZTpub3JtYWw7Zm9udC12YXJpYW50Om5v cm1hbDtmb250LXdlaWdodDpub3JtYWw7Zm9udC1zaXplOjdwdDtsaW5lLWhlaWdodDpub3JtYWw7 Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6JiMzOTtUaW1lcyAgDQpOZXcgUm9tYW4mIzM5OyI+oKCgoDxzcGFuPqA8L3Nw YW4+PC9zcGFuPjwvc3Bhbj48L3NwYW4+PHNwYW4gIA0Kc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtc2l6ZToxNHB0Ij5Z b3VyIHNpdGUgaGFzIGxlc3MgbnVtYmVyIG9mIEdvb2dsZSAmYW1wOyBZYWhvbyBiYWNrICANCmxp bmtzLCB0aGlzIGNhbiBiZSBpbXByb3ZlZCBmdXJ0aGVyLjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCAgDQpzdHls ZT0iY29sb3I6cmdiKDM0LDM0LDM0KTtmb250LWZhbWlseTphcmlhbDtmb250LXNpemU6c21hbGw7 Zm9udC1zdHlsZTpub3JtYWw7Zm9udC12YXJpYW50Om5vcm1hbDtmb250LXdlaWdodDpub3JtYWw7 bGV0dGVyLXNwYWNpbmc6bm9ybWFsO2xpbmUtaGVpZ2h0Om5vcm1hbDt0ZXh0LWFsaWduOnN0YXJ0 O3RleHQtaW5kZW50OjBweDt0ZXh0LXRyYW5zZm9ybTpub25lO3doaXRlLXNwYWNlOm5vcm1hbDt3 b3JkLXNwYWNpbmc6MHB4Ij4NCjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTRwdCI+VGhlcmUgYXJl IG1hbnkgYWRkaXRpb25hbCBpbXByb3ZlbWVudHMgdGhhdCAgDQpjb3VsZCBiZSBtYWRlIHRvIHlv dXIgd2Vic2l0ZSwgYW5kIGlmIHlvdSB3b3VsZCBsaWtlIHRvIGxlYXJuIGFib3V0IHRoZW0sICAN CmFuZCBhcmUgY3VyaW91cyB0byBrbm93IHdoYXQgb3VyIHdvcmtpbmcgdG9nZXRoZXIgd291bGQg aW52b2x2ZSwgdGhlbiBJICANCndvdWxkIGJlIGdsYWQgdG8gcHJvdmlkZSB5b3Ugd2l0aCBhIGRl dGFpbGVkIGFuYWx5c2lzIGluIHRoZSBmb3JtIG9mICANCmGgPGI+V0VCU0lURSBBVURJVCBSRVBP UlQgZm9yIEZSRUU8L2I+Ljwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCAgDQpzdHlsZT0iY29sb3I6cmdiKDM0LDM0 LDM0KTtmb250LWZhbWlseTphcmlhbDtmb250LXNpemU6c21hbGw7Zm9udC1zdHlsZTpub3JtYWw7 Zm9udC12YXJpYW50Om5vcm1hbDtmb250LXdlaWdodDpub3JtYWw7bGV0dGVyLXNwYWNpbmc6bm9y bWFsO2xpbmUtaGVpZ2h0Om5vcm1hbDt0ZXh0LWFsaWduOnN0YXJ0O3RleHQtaW5kZW50OjBweDt0 ZXh0LXRyYW5zZm9ybTpub25lO3doaXRlLXNwYWNlOm5vcm1hbDt3b3JkLXNwYWNpbmc6MHB4Ij4N CjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTRwdCI+T3VyIGNsaWVudHMgY29uc2lzdGVudGx5IHRl bGwgdXMgdGhhdCB0aGVpciAgDQpjdXN0b21lcnMgZmluZCB0aGVtIGJlY2F1c2UgdGhleSBhcmUg YXQgdGhlIHRvcCBvZiB0aGUgR29vZ2xlIHNlYXJjaCAgDQpyYW5raW5ncy4gQmVpbmcgYXQgdGhl IHRvcCBsZWZ0IG9mIEdvb2dsZSAoIzEtICMzIG9yZ2FuaWMgcG9zaXRpb25zKSBpcyB0aGUgIA0K YmVzdCB0aGluZyB5b3UgY2FuIGRvIGZvciB5b3VyIGNvbXBhbnkmIzM5O3Mgd2Vic2l0ZSB0cmFm ZmljIGFuZCBvbmxpbmUgIA0KcmVwdXRhdGlvbi48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0KPHAgIA0Kc3R5bGU9ImNv bG9yOnJnYigzNCwzNCwzNCk7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6YXJpYWw7Zm9udC1zaXplOnNtYWxsO2ZvbnQt c3R5bGU6bm9ybWFsO2ZvbnQtdmFyaWFudDpub3JtYWw7Zm9udC13ZWlnaHQ6bm9ybWFsO2xldHRl ci1zcGFjaW5nOm5vcm1hbDtsaW5lLWhlaWdodDpub3JtYWw7dGV4dC1hbGlnbjpzdGFydDt0ZXh0 LWluZGVudDowcHg7dGV4dC10cmFuc2Zvcm06bm9uZTt3aGl0ZS1zcGFjZTpub3JtYWw7d29yZC1z cGFjaW5nOjBweCI+DQo8c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjE0cHQiPk91ciBwYWNrYWdlcyBh cmUgZGVzaWduZWQgZm9yIGEgY29tcGxldGUgIA0KYWR2YW5jZSBTRU8gZXhwZXJpZW5jZSB3aGlj aCBpbmNsdWRlcyBTTU8sIEJyYW5kIG1hbmFnZW1lbnQsIFJlcHV0YXRpb24gIA0KbWFuYWdlbWVu dCwgU0VPIGV0Yy4gaW4gb3JkZXIgdG8gYmVhdCB5b3VyIGNvbXBldGl0b3JzLjwvc3Bhbj48c3Bh biAgDQpzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1zaXplOjE0cHQiPjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQo8cCAgDQpzdHlsZT0iY29s b3I6cmdiKDM0LDM0LDM0KTtmb250LWZhbWlseTphcmlhbDtmb250LXNpemU6c21hbGw7Zm9udC1z dHlsZTpub3JtYWw7Zm9udC12YXJpYW50Om5vcm1hbDtmb250LXdlaWdodDpub3JtYWw7bGV0dGVy LXNwYWNpbmc6bm9ybWFsO2xpbmUtaGVpZ2h0Om5vcm1hbDt0ZXh0LWFsaWduOnN0YXJ0O3RleHQt aW5kZW50OjBweDt0ZXh0LXRyYW5zZm9ybTpub25lO3doaXRlLXNwYWNlOm5vcm1hbDt3b3JkLXNw YWNpbmc6MHB4Ij4NCjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTRwdCI+U291bmRzIGludGVyZXN0 aW5nPyBGZWVsIGZyZWUgdG8gZW1haWwgdXMgb3IgIA0KYWx0ZXJuYXRpdmVseSB5b3UgY2FuIHBy b3ZpZGUgbWUgd2l0aCB5b3VyIHBob25lIG51bWJlciBhbmQgdGhlIGJlc3QgdGltZSAgDQp0byBj YWxsIHlvdS48L3NwYW4+PC9wPjxwICANCnN0eWxlPSJjb2xvcjpyZ2IoMzQsMzQsMzQpO2ZvbnQt ZmFtaWx5OmFyaWFsO2ZvbnQtc2l6ZTpzbWFsbDtmb250LXN0eWxlOm5vcm1hbDtmb250LXZhcmlh bnQ6bm9ybWFsO2ZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0Om5vcm1hbDtsZXR0ZXItc3BhY2luZzpub3JtYWw7bGluZS1o ZWlnaHQ6bm9ybWFsO3RleHQtYWxpZ246c3RhcnQ7dGV4dC1pbmRlbnQ6MHB4O3RleHQtdHJhbnNm b3JtOm5vbmU7d2hpdGUtc3BhY2U6bm9ybWFsO3dvcmQtc3BhY2luZzowcHgiPg0KPHNwYW4gIA0K c3R5bGU9ImxpbmUtaGVpZ2h0OjIxcHg7Zm9udC1zaXplOjE0cHQiPi0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLTxXQlI+LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS08YnI+PC9zcGFuPjxzcGFuICAN CnN0eWxlPSJmb250LXNpemU6MTRwdDtsaW5lLWhlaWdodDoyMXB4IiBsYW5nPSJFTi1JTiI+QmVz dCBSZWdhcmRzLKANCjxicj5NYXJ0aW4gSG9vdmVyIHxTRU8gQ29uc3VsdGFudDxicj5QSC4gTm86 oDYzMS0yOTItNDA5MDxicj4NCkFVUzogKzYxLTM5MDEzLTYwOTA8YnI+U2t5cGU6oHNlby5vbmxp bmVidXNpbmVzcw0KPC9zcGFuPg0KPHNwYW4gIA0Kc3R5bGU9ImxpbmUtaGVpZ2h0OjIxcHg7Zm9u dC1zaXplOjE0cHQiPjxicj4tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS08V0JSPi0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tPGJyPjxiPlBTMTwvYj46ICANClRoaXMgaXMgb25ldGltZSBlbWFpbCBh bmQgeW91IG1heSBhc2sgdXMgdG8gk1JFTU9WRZQgeW91IGZyb20gb3VyIG1haWxpbmcgIA0KbGlz dC6gPGJyPg0KPGI+UFMyPC9iPjogV2Ugb3BlcmF0ZSAyNCB4Ny4gSSB3aWxsIGJlIGhhcHB5IHRv IHNlbmQgeW91IGxpbmtzIHRvIHByaWNlICANCmxpc3QsIG1vbmV5IGJhY2sgZ3VhcmFudGVlLCBj bGllbnQgcmFua2luZ3MsIGNsaWVudCB0ZXN0aW1vbmlhbHMsIJNIb3cgd2UgIA0KYXJlIGRpZmZl cmVudCBmcm9tIG90aGVycz+ULCBhbmQgk1doeSBzaG91bGQgeW91IGNob29zZSB1cz+UIG9uIHJl Y2VpdmluZyBhICANCnJlc3BvbnNlIGZyb20geW91Ljwvc3Bhbj4NCjwvcD4NCjwvZGl2Pg0K From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 22 09:14:59 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88F56ABD for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 09:14:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lurieaustin1@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-x242.google.com (mail-we0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DEDF2B99 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 09:14:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f194.google.com with SMTP id u55so271818wes.1 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 02:14:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :thread-index:content-language; bh=YyIEnxQ3WSlIiiyBo62FSxsKtewpYmUA4JYFtjNnDrc=; b=XfGo8+IBvYM1LKLEnsLMelaTTqRxu8nUCXrSKId5+FjW6RhoXVJCxnwT/8Z+XuHOhG A0ILkFcFazPokONWRSc+lMtF7dudivM/tS8kFaDAy4e8szIjkWhHPSuF/0EAJgIXTMO9 /gtVU4au+v4QyFPqnBqG1QrXGIu+S2RA/fNjoVtOgkkmYzrehuobdfviGdVIoeJTVnPs MzULygk9xLN8i3PYtW96F2pxM+LF/U8ke/BPmMS6bpa8CNoWYiX2UfbPsli063rbxdt6 w0hJgpPgRhqv68ltRWRgSDH2D3Lf7mbNhhhW0QZOX1xEshG/p1kxdpxSVyM0tSfZaxYj w0ng== X-Received: by 10.180.21.175 with SMTP id w15mr8867014wie.40.1377162896981; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 02:14:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from lurie (105-236-216-241.access.mtnbusiness.co.za. [105.236.216.241]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ff5sm31486075wib.2.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 22 Aug 2013 02:14:56 -0700 (PDT) From: "Lurie Austinser" To: Subject: Updating broken link from your page: http://www.freebsddiary.org/polls.php Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:14:52 +0200 Message-ID: <016901ce9f18$11f3b9a0$35db2ce0$@com> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0 Thread-Index: Ac6fGA8yN4qD6naYS6a+QSAfvVuvOQ== Content-Language: en-us Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 09:14:59 -0000 Hello, I have bumped into your site while seeking for software and found your website very interesting :) Just a quick note, http://www.phpwizard.net/ is no longer active, and you are linking to it from page - http://www.freebsddiary.org/polls.php I was wondering if you don't mind updating the link to the updated website en.DownloadAstro.com (http://en.downloadastro.com/) - A great download site with more than 300K software and games, including professional reviews and user ratings. We are now in a process of updating the links in websites all around the world and I will appreciate your cooperation. I am sure your users will find it useful. Thanks, Lurie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 22 10:39:15 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81B3C667 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:39:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-qc0-x22e.google.com (mail-qc0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2FE1920DB for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:39:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f174.google.com with SMTP id c1so885577qcz.19 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 03:39:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :organization:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=F4lNkMOdGJwZfzP97xRn1BneCdhj7U2dJmdjac0PO6o=; b=P3V3LSOBr9HipnulQ9sKHLlq0dLJacm31xGrTc55/90n36eAZpE9WM7QDdrpez0z7r HPjsJXOT2HnySkDaowxdHOmCZdrCdwnj3Wh0WW0tr1XIBxDAWQ+dcsRvfBbGtslOzymP RY2AIVXztZcuVDKx0QOEaJ1COBdTjcdmvUKeY= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:reply-to:organization:face:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=F4lNkMOdGJwZfzP97xRn1BneCdhj7U2dJmdjac0PO6o=; b=pVi23X6fnDyKa9ZcHvvuoLM+EN0rqxAmfIn1Xl6rB/84K6QnqnUSCf0R3le9h3rVgk vIxYKOFcCkkoGybHWT884nexscXPelAUn5Mc6dqNkXEadIP05x3f/hlDGwMUgDy0Rp7j 5Ljv44IdkVod5h1Y5M+ADS1kgNdtCZBdmz0x3R8EQDIexj9FLYNHwDNvF5zm0fq4wkUJ vn54Q308oXfRsNPNmHPv/s2tPGha2a7V71VwNJOMdddQ6vpgeC8La+k+z+kKXSh2G9Q9 1g4CYGZuyxBzkxUSQRHAP/Q3oibi3H0BZ5cVHrBGwbwRwqD0HPZia9obQEECt9smEAjL TcTA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlMZGRZYab0gjSe8+nvhKSpacg/jbG1vcuW1jRtdoaBD+PVeM0nq5nYqYK+AiSQWP8IziI5 X-Received: by 10.224.131.4 with SMTP id v4mr16567251qas.44.1377167954259; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 03:39:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id m10sm17279599qae.12.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 22 Aug 2013 03:39:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jerry@seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3cLMg401z9z2CG47 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 06:39:11 -0400 (EDT) Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 06:39:11 -0400 From: Jerry To: FreeBSD Subject: Re: dig Message-ID: <20130822063911.3b413fc5@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <521565DC.7040501@restecp.com> References: <521565DC.7040501@restecp.com> Organization: seibercom.net X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) Face: 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 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:39:15 -0000 On Thu, 22 Aug 2013 11:14:04 +1000 Colin House articulated: > On 22/08/2013 9:34 AM, Doug Hardie wrote: > > There appears to be a problem with dig and the +trace option in > > 9.2. I believe its also in 9.1. The command: > > > > dig freebsd.org +trace > > > > Only yields a dumb response. No useful information is provided. > > Running the same command on FreeBSD 7.2 yields a complete trace > > with lots of useful information. > > Have you tested against another NS? I ran into a similar problem > when setting up unbound as a local recursor recently on a 9.1-STABLE > (r251985) box. > > dig +trace would return (next to) nothing. dig +trace > @8.8.8.8 worked as expected. > > I found it was the access-control configuration of unbound. Changing > my "access-control: ::1 allow" to "access-control: ::1 allow_snoop" > restored the +trace functionality. > > I'm not sure how this translates with bind.. Perhaps the defaults > have changed between the versions that you're running (if you're > running the base versions on 7.2 and 9.1) or your recursive server > isn't allowing it on 9.2? Fwiw, in unbound, "allow" allows recursive > lookups, "allow_snoop" allows both recursive and non-recursive > lookups. $ dig freebsd.org +trace ; <<>> DiG 9.6.-ESV-R7-P2 <<>> freebsd.org +trace ;; global options: +cmd ;; Received 12 bytes from 127.0.0.1#53(127.0.0.1) in 0 ms $ drill freebsd.org +trace ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, rcode: NOERROR, id: 28341 ;; flags: qr rd ra ; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 2, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 0 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;; +trace. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: +trace. 10 IN A 69.16.143.110 +trace. 10 IN A 66.152.109.110 ;; AUTHORITY SECTION: ;; ADDITIONAL SECTION: ;; Query time: 34 msec ;; SERVER: 209.18.47.62 ;; WHEN: Thu Aug 22 06:35:54 2013 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 56 I was surprised at the difference between the output of the two commands. -- Jerry â™” Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the Reply-To header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 22 12:43:48 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0C6ECB2 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:43:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from juris.kaminskis@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com (mail-wi0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5778C2A43 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:43:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id en1so607214wid.12 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 05:43:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Ah+KrKi0wJe9QL51yGvLRP/gwd0+aIOJX/IJ7I+yeh4=; b=N4VjD7qnXZGoBmH1Ayx+wbPXAn/EEkzWWVuVRSM84Q8dIqQQASh9nlqsiXeP+Ok2Me aDEaozKZIADZsPnkLFjXD7slxRqEl7gxNzHhhdxiLQM9ENyojSE/UXDHL+Zp1YEg6KHx odvbNFH/IxxJy3/L6JPPGGo38QEcJq+znzytJUaKy16yTszNNnhj50n4UwNCMorYQZok GMvnYDmy+J7E2ewctEIgx/rZ6mUZzgqTbA366AdfI4nQR3VTX+YmNQJ7Wpp0BXHslVlk ddVU0Gk81QfknPhWG5WY2JJrqTSYQhawXM6IhGkCDWWiB+JrmdlNIhCmZrPuxqwQDwXB FcaA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.11.233 with SMTP id t9mr9717462wib.41.1377175426631; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 05:43:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.83.225 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 05:43:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130820153321.c99e018a.freebsd@edvax.de> References: <20130820153321.c99e018a.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 15:43:46 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Setup HP Laserjet 1120m over network with LPD From: Juris Kaminskis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:43:48 -0000 finally my printer responds with this command: nc 192.168.1.105 9100 < output.xqx but I have no idea how to get it running through the normal LPD spooling system. output.xqx file I generate first with the foo2xqx-wrapper filter and it accepts only postscript i tried this printcap entry: HP|lp|Printer:\ :lp=9100@192.168.1.105:\ :sh:\ :mx#0:\ :sd=/var/spool/hp:\ :if=/usr/bin/foo2xqx-wrapper:\ :lf=/var/log/lpd-errs: but in the Status file i have: waiting for 9100@192.168.1.105 to come up btw: gsed package was not mentioned as dependency for foo2xqx-wrapper in the Installation Notes From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 22 12:53:35 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEA16345 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:53:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms16-1.1blu.de (ms16-1.1blu.de [89.202.0.34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6BD9A2AF0 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:53:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [89.204.139.229] (helo=tiny.Sisis.de) by ms16-1.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VCUO8-0002Ox-Hr; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:53:21 +0200 Received: from tiny.Sisis.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tiny.Sisis.de (8.14.5/8.14.3) with ESMTP id r7MCrHg7001653; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:53:18 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by tiny.Sisis.de (8.14.5/8.14.3/Submit) id r7MCrH9v001652; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:53:17 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: tiny.Sisis.de: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:53:16 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: Juris Kaminskis Subject: Re: Setup HP Laserjet 1120m over network with LPD Message-ID: <20130822125315.GA1638@tiny.Sisis.de> References: <20130820153321.c99e018a.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT r235646 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 89.204.139.229 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Matthias Apitz List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 12:53:35 -0000 El día Thursday, August 22, 2013 a las 03:43:46PM +0300, Juris Kaminskis escribió: > finally my printer responds with this command: > > nc 192.168.1.105 9100 < output.xqx I can't imagine that LPD port 515 is not supported by the printer; what telnet 192.168.1.105 515 gives? If this is timing out, I would rather think in firewall issue; if you really need to print raw to port 9100, with CUPS you would just configure it through CUPS' web inteface as socket://192.168.1.105:9100/?waiteof=false or on command line with # lpadmin -U root -p myprinter -D '' -L '' -E -v \ 'socket://192.168.1.105:9100/?waiteof=false' -P file.ppd HIH matthias -- Sent from my FreeBSD netbook Matthias Apitz, , http://www.unixarea.de/ f: +49-170-4527211 UNIX since V7 on PDP-11, UNIX on mainframe since ESER 1055 (IBM /370) UNIX on x86 since SVR4.2 UnixWare 2.1.2, FreeBSD since 2.2.5 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 22 13:19:37 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 780F2B09 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:19:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from juris.kaminskis@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x22e.google.com (mail-wi0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0DA112C74 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:19:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id j17so657495wiw.1 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 06:19:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Lz7LdQbT9SGjFERkTgFnC8B3AOyMOj4uarxXhhVmDo4=; b=a30NIlUxAk+O2ZgFiz6U/I89m6+4N4OL6mA/WSq7RnxOd0gHnQp3O6orMxf/xwvAyG sMGSz8rfycJjBXhKWZq7q0zz7DqA4DNCV6/KIxFmqYQUS/iwHOyPtaudfoWe2mrJBizu anQKFbjk7TQXkkhI+MtqQoDE+cdNHtHp6DAU75yljLAOUeUD/MO5PA9SbqLp9rymPfwX pTABtsCFYrNkfOufk1OBr2VL6F7S0PNHv3/RX83NKjpS7RNmGG8VEISQWwiGrc9L0dRQ dmMe8K3DtIiVni9AdMuvaZGXkEgwfTW1/bIXIX5FgL97GT3zluDSpPXbAm9AVfHU2fRC Rupw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.12.243 with SMTP id b19mr9788501wic.18.1377177575444; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 06:19:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.83.225 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 06:19:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130822125315.GA1638@tiny.Sisis.de> References: <20130820153321.c99e018a.freebsd@edvax.de> <20130822125315.GA1638@tiny.Sisis.de> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:19:35 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Setup HP Laserjet 1120m over network with LPD From: Juris Kaminskis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:19:37 -0000 > I can't imagine that LPD port 515 is not supported by the printer; what > > telnet 192.168.1.105 515 > > gives? telnet 192.168.1.105 515 Trying 192.168.1.105... Connected to NPI2B483C. Escape character is '^]'. port 515 is not accepting file directly, when I tried the output.xqx to this port nothing happened, only 9100 accepts > If this is timing out, I would rather think in firewall issue; > > if you really need to print raw to port 9100, with CUPS you would > just configure it through CUPS' web inteface as > > How in CUPS i will be able to use foo2xqx-wrapper, plus I am planning to add smart apsfilter from ports on top . I would like that all print jobs are converted first by apsfilter into postscript, then foo2xqx-wrapper makes them compatible for HP and finally I ship this data over network to my printer generally i would prefer to stick with the native freebsd printing system which is LPD From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 22 14:56:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB84127C for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:56:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADE1D233A for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:56:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.43]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id E519B22013 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:55:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213]) by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:55:53 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:references :subject:date; s=smtpout; bh=R8WKcaJv2+HW6cWpai/M1Wf/YzY=; b=Q8p cD+u8xHbu3yMZvzEnjvpVNLcUCJER0uAl0obtR5RkEcm/BcCkcqlBfMDgpZm3yMU QGiws9Ket8yFkvNy7arbGVpHif/JfaVRXNfnENvJAras+CatuHiWwGkc0FiQth2w v95DK4VqKcw/NacFKB6NSRAzp+yAQBxhIbLvJRlk= Received: by web3.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id 36FADB02389; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 10:55:53 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1377183353.3434.12899185.0697AF9A@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: MB3BV33up9iVryLTjzroKtt2xrgvAU7jX9M1wBX6EIGr 1377183353 From: Mark Felder To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-d009844e In-Reply-To: References: <20130820153321.c99e018a.freebsd@edvax.de> <20130822125315.GA1638@tiny.Sisis.de> Subject: Re: Setup HP Laserjet 1120m over network with LPD Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 09:55:53 -0500 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:56:01 -0000 On Thu, Aug 22, 2013, at 8:19, Juris Kaminskis wrote: > > generally i would prefer to stick with the native freebsd printing system > which is LPD > As you should! CUPS is horrible... I also use apsfilter. I can print almost any file I want just by doing lpr filename apsfilter's generated config required some hand tweaking by me, but here's an example I'll drop for you: /etc/printcap: netlaser|netlaser;r=600x600;q=medium;c=gray;p=letter;m=auto:\ :lp=9100@netlaser:\ :if=/usr/local/etc/apsfilter/basedir/bin/apsfilter:\ :sd=/var/spool/lpd/netlaser:\ :lf=/var/spool/lpd/netlaser/log:\ :af=/var/spool/lpd/netlaser/acct:\ :mx#0:\ :sh: /etc/hosts: 192.168.94.5 netlaser /usr/local/etc/apsfilter/netlaser/apsfilterrc: # # don't delete these settings # PRINTER='PS' PAPERSIZE='letter' METHOD='auto' QUALITY='medium' COLOR='gray' RESOLUTION='600x600' # apsfilter as jukebox # important if audio playback device is a network print queue # INTERFACE='network' INTERFACE='network' And then I think I just had to create /var/spool/lpd/netlaser with ownership root:daemon and 755 After that I think restarting lpd and it just works? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 22 16:55:27 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C198669 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:55:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from juris.kaminskis@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x22c.google.com (mail-wi0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C13C92B4D for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:55:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f172.google.com with SMTP id hj13so951354wib.5 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 09:55:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=7M4VVlN07CMGu3+zsc2vvgxnRhwPuFbfWZyYrmStFmU=; b=F+LH8EhhvLdMjUJCcoRg7o/MmjwFoISrIOHydy0u1E6H4vKrM65BcQnFUMvSMA7x6N GhghEeZLlpWIbB4JNiuHRtZX5Lrcm32abHeiT8nbpWue2mPMtuVQU02My7dJa3kc3C+8 m8xHojklH3MxKqLzn7XbWk9F+pdvCQH4hOw0uCLNmPiWaCeVNNHvRzI38LaK94BP6/XY P51Ba9aaex4zvW+yBlTelW38Taa28gjw4nBj4xr+hkufrDVtMrBjO+z+llzG6IeSdEsU B4+YIy4tVRHygrQSMJJEkf/DENBR/QSo9VO9MDIo1bi5Jb2+eq8ei96x4+Af3plltXaD hhhQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.75.165 with SMTP id d5mr11129360wjw.18.1377190525177; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 09:55:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.83.225 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 09:55:25 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20130822133313.GA16261@sh4-5.1blu.de> References: <20130820153321.c99e018a.freebsd@edvax.de> <20130822125315.GA1638@tiny.Sisis.de> <20130822133313.GA16261@sh4-5.1blu.de> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 19:55:25 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Setup HP Laserjet 1120m over network with LPD From: Juris Kaminskis To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:55:27 -0000 not sure what exactly did the trick either restart of LPD, or removing Hplip and CUPS packages, but now my printer responds via: lpr test.ps Success! Thank you very much to everyone! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 22 20:10:10 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 078503DF for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 20:10:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phoffman@proper.com) Received: from hoffman.proper.com (Hoffman.Proper.COM [207.182.41.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC8CC2B58 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 20:10:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-1-98-185.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.1.98.185]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.7/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r7MK7pNi004179 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:07:52 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from phoffman@proper.com) X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: Host 50-1-98-185.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.1.98.185] claimed to be [10.20.30.90] From: Paul Hoffman Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Finding exactly which commands, and in which order, rc is running at startup Message-Id: <4896463E-A9E3-4BD5-97AC-628AAFA9D1ED@proper.com> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:07:53 -0700 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 20:10:10 -0000 Greetings again. After doing a freebsd-update, my system is starting up = differently than it was before. I want to figure out why before I come = here and say "it's broken". Is there a way to say "show me all of the commands you are running = during startup"? It would be grand if I could say "tell me what you = would do next time (dry run)", but "what did you do last time" is OK = too. --Paul Hoffman= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 22 20:39:41 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CECD59B for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 20:39:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7993206E for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 20:39:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r7MKdW4L019830; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:39:32 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id r7MKdW5S019827; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:39:32 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:39:32 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Juris Kaminskis Subject: Re: Setup HP Laserjet 1120m over network with LPD In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <20130820153321.c99e018a.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Thu, 22 Aug 2013 14:39:32 -0600 (MDT) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 20:39:41 -0000 On Thu, 22 Aug 2013, Juris Kaminskis wrote: > finally my printer responds with this command: > > nc 192.168.1.105 9100 < output.xqx Okay, that's a good start. > but I have no idea how to get it running through the normal LPD spooling > system. output.xqx file I generate first with the foo2xqx-wrapper filter > and it accepts only postscript That is considered normal for Unix printers. If you want the complexity of a filter that autodetects input type, save adding that for later. > i tried this printcap entry: > > HP|lp|Printer:\ > :lp=9100@192.168.1.105:\ > :sh:\ > :mx#0:\ > :sd=/var/spool/hp:\ > :if=/usr/bin/foo2xqx-wrapper:\ > :lf=/var/log/lpd-errs: > > but in the Status file i have: waiting for 9100@192.168.1.105 to come up Do not use IP addresses. lpd really, really, *really* wants a resolvable hostname. Entering it in /etc/hosts is enough, then use that name above. > btw: gsed package was not mentioned as dependency for foo2xqx-wrapper in > the Installation Notes Depending on where those notes are, that should be mentioned to the author of the notes or the port maintainer. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 22 20:58:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7255EA for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 20:58:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from zoom.lafn.org (zoom.lafn.org [108.92.93.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 904552204 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 20:58:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.13.243.219] ([107.14.25.34]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoom.lafn.org (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r7MKvxAA046754 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:58:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) Subject: Re: dig From: Doug Hardie In-Reply-To: <521565DC.7040501@restecp.com> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 13:57:54 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <85C3B314-E299-4655-B14C-E496F34EE55D@lafn.org> References: <521565DC.7040501@restecp.com> To: Colin House X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97 at zoom.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 20:58:01 -0000 On 21 August 2013, at 18:14, Colin House wrote: > On 22/08/2013 9:34 AM, Doug Hardie wrote: >> There appears to be a problem with dig and the +trace option in 9.2. = I believe its also in 9.1. The command: >>=20 >> dig freebsd.org +trace >>=20 >> Only yields a dumb response. No useful information is provided. = Running the same command on FreeBSD 7.2 yields a complete trace with = lots of useful information. >=20 > Have you tested against another NS? I ran into a similar problem when = setting up unbound as a local recursor recently on a 9.1-STABLE = (r251985) box. >=20 > dig +trace would return (next to) nothing. dig +trace = @8.8.8.8 worked as expected. >=20 > I found it was the access-control configuration of unbound. Changing = my "access-control: ::1 allow" to "access-control: ::1 allow_snoop" = restored the +trace functionality. >=20 > I'm not sure how this translates with bind.. Perhaps the defaults have = changed between the versions that you're running (if you're running the = base versions on 7.2 and 9.1) or your recursive server isn't allowing it = on 9.2? Fwiw, in unbound, "allow" allows recursive lookups, = "allow_snoop" allows both recursive and non-recursive lookups. After a bunch of testing, I have determined that the problem is the = routers. If I use my local DNS servers or remote ones, then it works on = all three systems. Three different routers block it somehow. =20= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 22 23:46:43 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EA15B99 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 23:46:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mattmiller1@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qc0-x22f.google.com (mail-qc0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C84E32EF6 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 23:46:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id m4so1390358qcy.20 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:46:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=8LUvNwJL+2MLzs68kFvvcM2TbexmRjhDSM+11KTfxJA=; b=sD+3PnZcQQ3sc6zWNXUGYsqU9PIcNh/2U1GqVdLOdMYWAIzGCzKFq827Zto52JlGqN rUO3UnAhc/D2TEnXXOz0FB6ZSEQ9XD/QFAfkXDAEyXcnQYG3MqYguZ0RX59sMCvwn3BO pCMQtUZpTeAC+qqaCq4b/1zvBv64NisdxqVR4M5oHRYewl4MgpXt7BashJk+QJODYKOj vxkH+1AHdh/uzQ8z2nFTioGFDOIFmh6d1AEBUyZkGaO8Doxmp+WV2NTNrrXFvwg/bNxb ZVcICP9odiIgHSc769SYIt9yarvcA3cum4IWO47+//L1NAmszSaLc4qnTjveqwYzm1WR bYbA== X-Received: by 10.224.119.78 with SMTP id y14mr21197245qaq.11.1377215201875; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:46:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: mattmiller1@gmail.com Received: by 10.49.51.194 with HTTP; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 16:46:01 -0700 (PDT) From: Matt Miller Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 19:46:01 -0400 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8ZHsXkJx0NR-9nay_EU7cckdHuc Message-ID: Subject: kern_jail_set() Error Scenario Question To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 23:46:43 -0000 We ran into the following scenario in an application recently and were wondering if the behavior of kern_jail_set() is as expected here. This was an application bug where we were in, say, the JID 1 context and tried to call jailparam_set() with the flags (JAIL_CREATE | JAIL_UPDATE) and the "jid" param set to 1. The basic idea was to create or update JID 1 with some params, but the error was we were already in the JID 1 context. So, our understanding is this shouldn't work since JID 1 already exists and you can only modify it from a proper ancestor. However, rather than getting an error back from jailparam_set(), it ended up creating a second prison with JID 1, so there were two prisons existing with JID 1 at that point. This is based on 8.2.0 code, but, at first glance, it looks like the logic causing this may be the same in head. Looking at kern_jail_set(), what happens here is: 1. We find a prison with JID=1, however since it's not a proper child we set pr = NULL in line 1024: 1011 pr = prison_find(jid); 1012 if (pr != NULL) { 1013 ppr = pr->pr_parent; 1014 /* Create: jid must not exist. */ 1015 if (cuflags == JAIL_CREATE) { 1016 mtx_unlock(&pr->pr_mtx); 1017 error = EEXIST; 1018 vfs_opterror(opts, "jail %d already exists", 1019 jid); 1020 goto done_unlock_list; 1021 } 1022 if (!prison_ischild(mypr, pr)) { 1023 mtx_unlock(&pr->pr_mtx); 1024 pr = NULL; 1025 } else if (pr->pr_uref == 0) { 2. Since pr is NULL, we create a new prison. Since the jid is not zero, we insert it in the list and set its pr_id. At this point, we have two prisons with a JID of 1 and the same parent prison. 1166 /* If there's no prison to update, create a new one and link it in. */ 1167 if (pr == NULL) { ... 1185 pr = malloc(sizeof(*pr), M_PRISON, M_WAITOK | M_ZERO); 1186 if (jid == 0) { ... 1212 } else { 1213 /* 1214 * The jail already has a jid (that did not yet exist), 1215 * so just find where to insert it. 1216 */ 1217 TAILQ_FOREACH(tpr, &allprison, pr_list) 1218 if (tpr->pr_id >= jid) { 1219 TAILQ_INSERT_BEFORE(tpr, pr, pr_list); 1220 break; 1221 } 1222 } ... 1229 pr->pr_parent = ppr; 1230 pr->pr_id = jid; We wanted to see if this is per design or a situation that should avoid creating the second prison and return an error. Thanks, Matt From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 23 03:18:56 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB935D44 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 03:18:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vagabond@blackfoot.net) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 415E528D3 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 03:18:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id r7N3G6mB087664; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 21:16:24 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from vagabond@blackfoot.net) Message-ID: <5216D3F7.50704@blackfoot.net> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 21:16:07 -0600 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130730 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Dan Lists Subject: Re: ipfw confusion References: <5211B5E1.6040000@blackfoot.net> <52128B95.30006@blackfoot.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Thu, 22 Aug 2013 21:16:29 -0600 (MDT) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 03:18:57 -0000 On 08/20/13 12:41, Dan Lists wrote: > You might turn on logging and post the logs of what is being blocked. > Sometimes things are being blocked by rules you do not expect. Thanks for the suggestion. I was seeing refusals from named and mistakenly interpreting them as ipfw issues. > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Gary Aitken wrote: > >> On 08/19/13 00:36, Jason Cox wrote: >>> Are you sure that your DNS requests are over TCP? DNS primarily uses UDP >> to >>> serve requests. TCP is used when the response data size exceeds 512 bytes >>> (I think), or for tasks such as zone transfers. I know a few resolver >>> implementations use TCP for all queries, but most I have used not. You >>> might want to add rules to allow UDP as well. >> >> There are identical rules included for udp: >> >> 21149 allow udp from any to 12.32.44.142 dst-port 53 in via tun0 keep-state >> 21169 allow udp from any to 12.32.36.65 dst-port 53 in via tun0 keep-state >> >> One of the requests which is being refused is a zone transfer request from >> a secondary which is a tcp request. Others are probably udp. >> >>> On Sun, Aug 18, 2013 at 11:06 PM, Gary Aitken >> wrote: >>> >>>> I'm having some weird ipfw behavior, or it seems weird to me, and am >>>> looking >>>> for an explaination and then a way out. >>>> >>>> ipfw list >>>> ... >>>> 21109 allow tcp from any to 12.32.44.142 dst-port 53 in via tun0 setup >>>> keep-state >>>> 21129 allow tcp from any to 12.32.36.65 dst-port 53 in via tun0 setup >>>> keep-state >>>> ... >>>> 65534 deny log logamount 5 ip from any to any >>>> >>>> tail -f messages >>>> Aug 18 23:33:06 nightmare named[914]: client 188.231.152.46#63877: error >>>> sending response: permission denied >>>> >>>> 12.32.36.65 is the addr of the internal interface (xl0) on the firewall >>>> and is the public dns server. >>>> 12.32.44.142 is the addr of the external interface (tun0) which is >> bridged >>>> on a >>>> dsl line. >>>> >>>> It appears that a dns request was allowed in, but the response was not >>>> allowed >>>> back out. It seems to me the above rules 21109 and 21129 should have >>>> allowed >>>> the request in and the response back out. >>>> >>>> It's possible a request could come in on 12.32.44.142, >>>> which is why 21109 is present; >>>> although I know I am getting failures to reply to refresh requests >>>> from a secondary addressed to 12.32.36.65 >>>> >>>> What am I missing? >>>> >>>> Is there a problem if the incoming rule is for tun0, >>>> which gets passed to named >>>> since 12.32.44.142 is on the physical machine running named, >>>> but named pumps its response out on 12.32.36.65, >>>> relying on routing to get it to the right place, >>>> and that fails to match the state tracking mechanism >>>> which started with 12.32.44.142? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 23 04:42:50 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5434E5CC for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 04:42:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vagabond@blackfoot.net) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24FE32BEB for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 04:42:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id r7N4gf2N087895 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2013 22:42:42 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from vagabond@blackfoot.net) Message-ID: <5216E841.504@blackfoot.net> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2013 22:42:41 -0600 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130730 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: hugin? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Thu, 22 Aug 2013 22:42:42 -0600 (MDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 04:42:50 -0000 Is anyone using the current port of hugin successfully on 9.1? I've never used it before but an attempt to start it crashes: $ hugin /usr/local/share/hugin/data/plugins/top_five.py CAT:Control Points NAM:keep 5 CPs per image pair /usr/local/share/hugin/data/plugins/woa.py CAT:Control Points NAM:Warped Overlap Analysis /usr/local/share/hugin/data/plugins/shooting_pattern.py CAT:initial distribution NAM:6-1-1 Shooting Pattern /usr/local/share/hugin/data/plugins/crop_cp.py CAT:Control Points NAM:Crop Control Points Segmentation fault: 11 (core dumped) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 23 06:14:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C6C4E7E for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 06:14:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4D512F31 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 06:14:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r7N6DpDp003839 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 07:13:52 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk r7N6DpDp003839 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/r7N6DpDp003839; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none (unprotected policy) Message-ID: <5216FD9F.5040506@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 07:13:51 +0100 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Finding exactly which commands, and in which order, rc is running at startup References: <4896463E-A9E3-4BD5-97AC-628AAFA9D1ED@proper.com> In-Reply-To: <4896463E-A9E3-4BD5-97AC-628AAFA9D1ED@proper.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.2 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hkdSUSJch3rWm8Jak7SCEsQbfkXj1RLx1" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.8 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 06:14:02 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --hkdSUSJch3rWm8Jak7SCEsQbfkXj1RLx1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 22/08/2013 21:07, Paul Hoffman wrote: > Greetings again. After doing a freebsd-update, my system is starting > up differently than it was before. I want to figure out why before I > come here and say "it's broken". >=20 > Is there a way to say "show me all of the commands you are running > during startup"? It would be grand if I could say "tell me what you > would do next time (dry run)", but "what did you do last time" is OK > too. How much detail do you want? You probably can't get a report on every single process run during the boot process at all easily. However, you can see the console output from the boot process. To see what the kernel emits on boot-up, look at /var/run/dmesg.boot -- if you've got an old copy of dmesg.boot around somewhere, comparing the two should show you any changes in the devices the kernel discovers when it probes your system. To see the output from the rc system, the best thing is to enable the console log. Edit /etc/syslog.conf and uncomment the indicated line, as = so: # uncomment this to log all writes to /dev/console to /var/log/console.lo= g console.info /var/log/console.log Then do: touch /var/log/console.log chmod 600 /var/log/console.log /etc/rc.d/syslogd restart Obviously, that won't help you see what happened on the previous reboot, but on the next reboot you should see a transcript of the console output.= Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --hkdSUSJch3rWm8Jak7SCEsQbfkXj1RLx1 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.16 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlIW/Z8ACgkQ8Mjk52CukIzyggCdHgxIhSPZad7Vxra6CRtepJMF SxUAn3/TquVMlOpXqIMamobq950NPh4S =JXC5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hkdSUSJch3rWm8Jak7SCEsQbfkXj1RLx1-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 23 08:41:49 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 116F3D4A for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 08:41:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Received: from zoom.lafn.org (zoom.lafn.org [108.92.93.123]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC765269E for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 08:41:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.1.3] (static-71-177-216-148.lsanca.fios.verizon.net [71.177.216.148]) (authenticated bits=0) by zoom.lafn.org (8.14.3/8.14.2) with ESMTP id r7N8ffVH078815 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 01:41:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bc979@lafn.org) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) Subject: Re: Finding exactly which commands, and in which order, rc is running at startup From: Doug Hardie In-Reply-To: <4896463E-A9E3-4BD5-97AC-628AAFA9D1ED@proper.com> Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 01:41:40 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <4237C275-EFFE-437C-8332-43FA91FDE718@lafn.org> References: <4896463E-A9E3-4BD5-97AC-628AAFA9D1ED@proper.com> To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97 at zoom.lafn.org X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 08:41:49 -0000 On 22 August 2013, at 13:07, Paul Hoffman wrote: > Greetings again. After doing a freebsd-update, my system is starting = up differently than it was before. I want to figure out why before I = come here and say "it's broken". >=20 > Is there a way to say "show me all of the commands you are running = during startup"? It would be grand if I could say "tell me what you = would do next time (dry run)", but "what did you do last time" is OK = too. You can add: rc_debug=3D"YES" to /etc/rc.conf and that might give you what you need. According to the = man page it will "produces copious output to the terminal and syslog(3)"= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 23 09:46:28 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F9A250 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 09:46:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ulriksaa@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vb0-x22a.google.com (mail-vb0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c02::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17ACC2A06 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 09:46:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vb0-f42.google.com with SMTP id e12so284284vbg.29 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 02:46:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=z8Z5S2WLIhS81OQ54SrHFzw0T7uZ/+gn4XvuNjfRc64=; b=mLpoMkmC8K3mgfFo8jmyzHTcUh+NHOVvhKJY4iN+NVKGJREUF/kwPaTwhYMAeypOfy KASRbqe7QPk999kjo2zjM7LKhZe8qGyIPi3q1OMc4M/+0dLTNTS7tV8x9ASvq7OhHI+d xVMPu+segGmBc4pR+C5d32PXdZB/ZH4uC6E564a6TN7iNslhEzTRigLbD3U70vsHrhAe JZb1iplLKE8APmr9MsjQSrR9E4KvpQ4SCUsSI3BXioT80zUpxvrdiORIQ9s/FeM5Hr/y /PIKRfxXx3hEsa3aFf8sZEPcND8ct5Xm/GKamjgPnpEnjhPsyjs8unEKpjt2Z45e2ymz brpQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.220.46.72 with SMTP id i8mr15955837vcf.10.1377251187073; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 02:46:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.52.166.130 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 02:46:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4237C275-EFFE-437C-8332-43FA91FDE718@lafn.org> References: <4896463E-A9E3-4BD5-97AC-628AAFA9D1ED@proper.com> <4237C275-EFFE-437C-8332-43FA91FDE718@lafn.org> Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 11:46:27 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Finding exactly which commands, and in which order, rc is running at startup From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ulrik_S=F8gaard?= To: Doug Hardie Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 09:46:28 -0000 On 23 August 2013 10:41, Doug Hardie wrote: > > On 22 August 2013, at 13:07, Paul Hoffman wrote: > > > Greetings again. After doing a freebsd-update, my system is starting up > differently than it was before. I want to figure out why before I come here > and say "it's broken". > > > > Is there a way to say "show me all of the commands you are running > during startup"? It would be grand if I could say "tell me what you would > do next time (dry run)", but "what did you do last time" is OK too. > > You can add: > > rc_debug="YES" > > to /etc/rc.conf and that might give you what you need. According to the > man page it will "produces copious output to the terminal and syslog(3)" > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > You can use "rcorder /etc/rc.d/* /usr/local/etc/rc.d/*" to show the order of which the startup scripts is run. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 23 13:10:40 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96B147E8 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 13:10:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 47FF52628 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 13:10:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r7NDAVN5026516; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 07:10:31 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id r7NDAVxo026513; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 07:10:31 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 07:10:31 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: Gary Aitken Subject: Re: hugin? In-Reply-To: <5216E841.504@blackfoot.net> Message-ID: References: <5216E841.504@blackfoot.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 23 Aug 2013 07:10:31 -0600 (MDT) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 13:10:40 -0000 On Thu, 22 Aug 2013, Gary Aitken wrote: > Is anyone using the current port of hugin successfully on 9.1? > I've never used it before but an attempt to start it crashes: > > $ hugin > /usr/local/share/hugin/data/plugins/top_five.py > CAT:Control Points > NAM:keep 5 CPs per image pair > /usr/local/share/hugin/data/plugins/woa.py > CAT:Control Points > NAM:Warped Overlap Analysis > /usr/local/share/hugin/data/plugins/shooting_pattern.py > CAT:initial distribution > NAM:6-1-1 Shooting Pattern > /usr/local/share/hugin/data/plugins/crop_cp.py > CAT:Control Points > NAM:Crop Control Points > Segmentation fault: 11 (core dumped) That could be from having the OpenGL preview window enabled. In ~/.hugin, go to the [GLPreviewFrame] section and set isShown to zero. After the program starts, that can be set in the Preferences: File/Preferences/Assistant "After align open". Set it to "Preview Window" rather than "Fast preview window". From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 23 16:59:10 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9928159 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 16:59:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vagabond@blackfoot.net) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59C3D2416 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 16:59:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id r7NGx15N090002; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 10:59:01 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from vagabond@blackfoot.net) Message-ID: <521794D5.2040409@blackfoot.net> Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 10:59:01 -0600 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130730 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Warren Block Subject: Re: hugin? References: <5216E841.504@blackfoot.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Fri, 23 Aug 2013 10:59:02 -0600 (MDT) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 16:59:10 -0000 On 08/23/13 07:10, Warren Block wrote: > On Thu, 22 Aug 2013, Gary Aitken wrote: > >> Is anyone using the current port of hugin successfully on 9.1? I've >> never used it before but an attempt to start it crashes: >> >> $ hugin /usr/local/share/hugin/data/plugins/top_five.py CAT:Control >> Points NAM:keep 5 CPs per image pair >> /usr/local/share/hugin/data/plugins/woa.py CAT:Control Points >> NAM:Warped Overlap Analysis >> /usr/local/share/hugin/data/plugins/shooting_pattern.py CAT:initial >> distribution NAM:6-1-1 Shooting Pattern >> /usr/local/share/hugin/data/plugins/crop_cp.py CAT:Control Points >> NAM:Crop Control Points Segmentation fault: 11 (core dumped) > > That could be from having the OpenGL preview window enabled. In > ~/.hugin, go to the [GLPreviewFrame] section and set isShown to zero. > After the program starts, that can be set in the Preferences: > File/Preferences/Assistant "After align open". Set it to "Preview > Window" rather than "Fast preview window". I don't see any "GLPreviewFrame", or any "Preview" at all; or any "Shown": cat .hugin version=2012.0 [AutoPano] AutoPanoCount=10 Default=0 [AutoPano/AutoPano_0] Type=1 Description=Hugin's CPFind Program=cpfind Arguments=--multirow -o %o %s ProgramMatcher= ArgumentsMatcher= Option=1 [AutoPano/AutoPano_1] Type=1 Description=Hugin's CPFind + Celeste (slower but more accurate, no cps on clouds) Program=cpfind Arguments=--celeste --multirow -o %o %s ProgramMatcher= ArgumentsMatcher= Option=1 [AutoPano/AutoPano_2] Type=2 Description=Cpfind (multirow/stacked) Program=cpfind Arguments=-o %o --multirow %s ProgramMatcher= ArgumentsMatcher= ProgramStack=align_image_stack ArgumentsStack=-f %v -v -p %o %i Option=1 [AutoPano/AutoPano_3] Type=1 Description=Autopano-SIFT-C Program=autopano-noop.sh Arguments=--maxmatches %p --projection %f,%v %o %i ProgramMatcher= ArgumentsMatcher= Option=1 [AutoPano/AutoPano_4] Type=1 Description=Panomatic Program=panomatic Arguments=-o %o %i ProgramMatcher= ArgumentsMatcher= Option=1 [AutoPano/AutoPano_5] Type=4 Description=Autopano-SIFT-C (multirow/stacked) Program=generatekeys Arguments=%i %k 800 ProgramMatcher=autopano ArgumentsMatcher=--maxmatches %p %o %k ArgumentsCleanup= ProgramStack=align_image_stack ArgumentsStack=-f %v -v -p %o %i Option=1 [AutoPano/AutoPano_6] Type=1 Description=Align image stack Program=align_image_stack Arguments=-f %v -v -p %o %i ProgramMatcher= ArgumentsMatcher= Option=1 [AutoPano/AutoPano_7] Type=1 Description=Align image stack FullFrameFisheye Program=align_image_stack Arguments=-f %v -e -p %o %i ProgramMatcher= ArgumentsMatcher= Option=1 [AutoPano/AutoPano_8] Type=1 Description=Vertical lines Program=linefind Arguments=-o %o %s ProgramMatcher= ArgumentsMatcher= Option=1 [AutoPano/AutoPano_9] Type=1 Description=Hugin's CPFind (prealigned) Program=cpfind Arguments=--prealigned -o %o %s ProgramMatcher= ArgumentsMatcher= Option=1 gdb shows the following: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. [Switching to Thread 812807400 (LWP 100339/hugin)] 0x000000080525cab0 in wxWindow::DoSetSize () from /usr/local/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0 (gdb) where #0 0x000000080525cab0 in wxWindow::DoSetSize () from /usr/local/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0 #1 0x0000000805342c7e in wxBoxSizer::RecalcSizes () from /usr/local/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0 #2 0x00000008053546f0 in wxWindowBase::Layout () from /usr/local/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0 #3 0x000000080537f5d6 in wxPanel::OnSize () from /usr/local/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0 #4 0x0000000804dfe48d in wxEvtHandler::ProcessEventIfMatches () from /usr/local/lib/libwx_baseu-2.8.so.0 #5 0x0000000804dfe64c in wxEventHashTable::HandleEvent () from /usr/local/lib/libwx_baseu-2.8.so.0 #6 0x0000000804dfe78d in wxEvtHandler::ProcessEvent () from /usr/local/lib/libwx_baseu-2.8.so.0 #7 0x000000080525ca85 in wxWindow::DoSetSize () from /usr/local/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0 #8 0x0000000805342c7e in wxBoxSizer::RecalcSizes () from /usr/local/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0 #9 0x0000000805342c03 in wxBoxSizer::RecalcSizes () from /usr/local/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0 #10 0x0000000805342c7e in wxBoxSizer::RecalcSizes () from /usr/local/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0 #11 0x0000000805342c03 in wxBoxSizer::RecalcSizes () from /usr/local/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0 #12 0x0000000805342c7e in wxBoxSizer::RecalcSizes () from /usr/local/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0 #13 0x0000000805342c7e in wxBoxSizer::RecalcSizes () from /usr/local/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0 #14 0x00000008053546f0 in wxWindowBase::Layout () from /usr/local/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0 #15 0x00000008056b7f08 in wxAuiManager::DoFrameLayout () from /usr/local/lib/libwx_gtk2u_aui-2.8.so.0 #16 0x00000008056bf720 in wxAuiManager::Update () from /usr/local/lib/libwx_gtk2u_aui-2.8.so.0 #17 0x000000000054e0b8 in HuginBase::Nona::ReduceStitcher, std::allocator > >, vigra::BasicImage > >::stitch, vigra::RGBValue**>, vigra::RGBAccessor >, vigra::BasicImageIterator, vigra::StandardValueAccessor, vigra_ext::ReduceToHDRFunctor > > () #18 0x0000000000471469 in wxListEvent::~wxListEvent () so it appears to be ui related. BTW, the splash screen displays before anything starts happening: /usr/local/share/hugin/data/plugins/top_five.py CAT:Control Points NAM:keep 5 CPs per image pair /usr/local/share/hugin/data/plugins/woa.py CAT:Control Points NAM:Warped Overlap Analysis /usr/local/share/hugin/data/plugins/shooting_pattern.py CAT:initial distribution NAM:6-1-1 Shooting Pattern /usr/local/share/hugin/data/plugins/crop_cp.py CAT:Control Points NAM:Crop Control Points Segmentation fault: 11 (core dumped) From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 23 18:11:48 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56CC329E for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 18:11:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jpc@porterclark.com) Received: from mail.cluebytwelve.org (clueby12.org [198.186.190.239]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F52B28C7 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 18:11:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 24-183-226-240.dhcp.kgpt.tn.charter.com (unknown [24.183.226.240]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.cluebytwelve.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 82B8C1B5DA for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 13:04:09 -0500 (CDT) Received: by 24-183-226-240.dhcp.kgpt.tn.charter.com (Postfix, from userid 501) id 019A491D1924; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 13:03:59 -0500 (CDT) Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 13:03:59 -0500 From: "J. Porter Clark" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: g_vfs_done and error 11 (EDEADLK) Message-ID: <20130823180359.GA42062@MacPorter.local> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Organization: http://www.angelfire.com/ego/porterclark/ User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 18:11:48 -0000 Anyone know why FreeBSD would give g_vfs_done errors with EDEADLK? Aug 22 15:31:14 drum kernel: g_vfs_done():gpt/enc.eli[WRITE(offset=65968111616, length=32768)]error = 11 Aug 22 15:31:14 drum kernel: g_vfs_done():gpt/enc.eli[WRITE(offset=65968373760, length=32768)]error = 11 Aug 22 15:31:14 drum kernel: g_vfs_done():gpt/enc.eli[WRITE(offset=65968635904, length=32768)]error = 11 Aug 22 15:31:14 drum kernel: g_vfs_done():gpt/enc.eli[WRITE(offset=65968865280, length=32768)]error = 11 Aug 22 15:31:14 drum kernel: g_vfs_done():gpt/enc.eli[WRITE(offset=65969127424, length=32768)]error = 11 Aug 22 15:31:14 drum kernel: g_vfs_done():gpt/enc.eli[WRITE(offset=65969389568, length=32768)]error = 11 Aug 22 15:31:14 drum kernel: g_vfs_done():gpt/enc.eli[WRITE(offset=65969651712, length=32768)]error = 11 Aug 22 15:31:14 drum kernel: g_vfs_done():gpt/enc.eli[WRITE(offset=65969881088, length=32768)]error = 11 Aug 22 15:31:14 drum kernel: g_vfs_done():gpt/enc.eli[WRITE(offset=65970143232, length=32768)]error = 11 Aug 22 15:31:14 drum kernel: g_vfs_done():gpt/enc.eli[WRITE(offset=65970405376, length=32768)]error = 11 Aug 22 15:31:14 drum kernel: g_vfs_done():gpt/enc.eli[WRITE(offset=65970667520, length=32768)]error = 11 Aug 22 15:31:14 drum kernel: g_vfs_done():gpt/enc.eli[WRITE(offset=65970896896, length=32768)]error = 11 Aug 22 15:31:14 drum kernel: g_vfs_done():gpt/enc.eli[WRITE(offset=65971159040, length=32768)]error = 11 Aug 22 15:31:14 drum kernel: g_vfs_done():gpt/enc.eli[WRITE(offset=65971421184, length=32768)]error = 11 Aug 22 15:31:14 drum kernel: g_vfs_done():gpt/enc.eli[WRITE(offset=65971683328, length=32768)]error = 11 Aug 22 15:31:14 drum kernel: g_vfs_done():gpt/enc.eli[WRITE(offset=65971912704, length=32768)]error = 11 Aug 22 15:31:14 drum kernel: g_vfs_done():gpt/enc.eli[READ(offset=81416159232, length=32768)]error = 11 Aug 22 15:31:14 drum kernel: g_vfs_done():gpt/enc.eli[WRITE(offset=65848246272, length=32768)]error = 11 Aug 22 15:31:14 drum kernel: g_vfs_done():ufs/var[WRITE(offset=1275428864, length=16384)]error = 11 The gpt/enc.eli is a GELI partition. ufs/var is not. If I go to the offset in ufs/var, it turns out to point to the syslog entry corresponding to the previous line. What's really strange is that none of the files on either disk appear to be corrupted. smartctl shows no errors on either drive. dding the entire drive produces no errors. The GELI drive is exported via samba. The errors are triggered when accessing the samba share from a PC. This is not reliably repeatable. My question is: What does error = 11 mean in this context? FreeBSD drum.msfc.nasa.gov 9.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 9.2-PRERELEASE #0 r254654: Thu Aug 22 09:13:25 CDT 2013 jpc@drum.msfc.nasa.gov:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BORODIN9 i386 -- J. Porter Clark From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 23 18:55:24 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB2A1623; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 18:55:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB0B92BD6; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 18:55:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [38.105.238.108]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E33D2B98A; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 14:55:23 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-drivers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: UUID in fstab. Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 14:44:15 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110714-p28; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: <503E443D-BC48-4284-8FC4-22B0A50DF147@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201308231444.15353.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Fri, 23 Aug 2013 14:55:24 -0400 (EDT) Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, varanasi sainath , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Warner Losh X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 18:55:25 -0000 On Wednesday, August 21, 2013 4:38:00 pm varanasi sainath wrote: > Thanks for the support. > > I want to use the uuid's found using sysctl -a in fstab. > /dev/gptid/ has only uuid for boot partition. You probably have the other GPT paritions already mounted via another name which removes the names in /dev/gptid. Try booting an install CD or USB stick such that you use an alternate root fs and don't mount any of the partitions on your drive. Then you should be able to see the entries in /dev/gptid and update your fstab appropriately. If you console access you could also try to update your fstab to use /dev/gptid/ directly instead of /dev/XXXpYY and reboot. If it works I believe the /dev/XXXpYY names will now be gone from /dev and the /dev/gptid names present instead. -- John Baldwin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 23 18:55:26 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2D626B9; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 18:55:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A93D62BD7; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 18:55:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [38.105.238.108]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D447FB999; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 14:55:24 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-drivers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel Panic - Unix socket communication in kernel module Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 14:48:54 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/8.2-CBSD-20110714-p28; KDE/4.5.5; amd64; ; ) References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201308231448.54236.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Fri, 23 Aug 2013 14:55:25 -0400 (EDT) Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org, abgupta@microsoft.com, varanasi sainath , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 18:55:26 -0000 On Monday, July 29, 2013 3:31:49 am varanasi sainath wrote: > Hello, > > I am writing a kernel module in which I am trying to connect to a UNIX > socket > (UNIX domain sockets use the file system as their address name space). > Kernel module (loadable) acts as a client and User mode program acts as > server, > I have loaded the module using kldload and communication between > user and kernel module works fine, > when I try to load the kernel module from loader.conf - > auto load the kernel module at boot up leads to kernel panic > as the file system is not ready and kern_connect fails. > > How to notify kernel module that File system is ready? > (any specific event flags) > > Is there any specific location for Unix domain socket files? > (currently created it under /root/soc/socket ) > > Using "MODULE_DEPEND" Can I make the module dependent of file system? You can register a hook for the 'mountroot' EVENTHANDLER event which will fire after / is mounted. (You could compare rootvnode against NULL during module startup to determine if you should defer your work to the EVENTHANDLER vs doing it right away.) If you need to wait for all local filesystems to be mounted, then you will need to have some userland utility poke your module via a sysctl/ioctl/etc. after the filesystems are mounted (you could use a custom rc.d script for this). -- John Baldwin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 23 22:34:16 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62908596 for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 22:34:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@gritton.org) Received: from m2.gritton.org (gritton.org [199.192.164.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43AA9290C for ; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 22:34:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from guppy.corp.verio.net (fw.oremut02.us.wh.verio.net [198.65.168.24]) (authenticated bits=0) by m2.gritton.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r7NMHm8J017040; Fri, 23 Aug 2013 16:17:49 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from jamie@gritton.org) Message-ID: <5217DF87.9080800@gritton.org> Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 16:17:43 -0600 From: James Gritton User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130807 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Matt Miller Subject: Re: kern_jail_set() Error Scenario Question References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2013 22:34:16 -0000 On 08/22/13 17:46, Matt Miller wrote: > We ran into the following scenario in an application recently and were > wondering if the behavior of kern_jail_set() is as expected here. > > This was an application bug where we were in, say, the JID 1 context > and tried to call jailparam_set() with the flags (JAIL_CREATE | > JAIL_UPDATE) and the "jid" param set to 1. The basic idea was to > create or update JID 1 with some params, but the error was we were > already in the JID 1 context. So, our understanding is this shouldn't > work since JID 1 already exists and you can only modify it from a > proper ancestor. > > However, rather than getting an error back from jailparam_set(), it > ended up creating a second prison with JID 1, so there were two > prisons existing with JID 1 at that point. This is based on 8.2.0 > code, but, at first glance, it looks like the logic causing this may > be the same in head. > > Looking at kern_jail_set(), what happens here is: > > 1. We find a prison with JID=1, however since it's not a proper child > we set pr = NULL in line 1024: > > 1011 pr = prison_find(jid); > 1012 if (pr != NULL) { > 1013 ppr = pr->pr_parent; > 1014 /* Create: jid must not exist. */ > 1015 if (cuflags == JAIL_CREATE) { > 1016 mtx_unlock(&pr->pr_mtx); > 1017 error = EEXIST; > 1018 vfs_opterror(opts, "jail %d > already exists", > 1019 jid); > 1020 goto done_unlock_list; > 1021 } > 1022 if (!prison_ischild(mypr, pr)) { > 1023 mtx_unlock(&pr->pr_mtx); > 1024 pr = NULL; > 1025 } else if (pr->pr_uref == 0) { > > 2. Since pr is NULL, we create a new prison. Since the jid is not > zero, we insert it in the list and set its pr_id. At this point, we > have two prisons with a JID of 1 and the same parent prison. > > 1166 /* If there's no prison to update, create a new one and > link it in. */ > 1167 if (pr == NULL) { > ... > 1185 pr = malloc(sizeof(*pr), M_PRISON, M_WAITOK | M_ZERO); > 1186 if (jid == 0) { > ... > 1212 } else { > 1213 /* > 1214 * The jail already has a jid (that did > not yet exist), > 1215 * so just find where to insert it. > 1216 */ > 1217 TAILQ_FOREACH(tpr, &allprison, pr_list) > 1218 if (tpr->pr_id >= jid) { > 1219 TAILQ_INSERT_BEFORE(tpr, > pr, pr_list); > 1220 break; > 1221 } > 1222 } > ... > 1229 pr->pr_parent = ppr; > 1230 pr->pr_id = jid; > > We wanted to see if this is per design or a situation that should > avoid creating the second prison and return an error. That's definitely not per design. I'll try reproducing this, and put in correct logic. The proper response is indeed an error: ENOENT, because from inside the JID 1 context you shouldn't be able to see jail #1 (you can't operate on your own jail). - Jamie From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 24 10:06:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CBCF6F0 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 10:06:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@hotmail.com) Received: from blu0-omc4-s28.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc4-s28.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.167]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2878259D for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 10:06:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU0-SMTP166 ([65.55.111.135]) by blu0-omc4-s28.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 24 Aug 2013 03:05:04 -0700 X-TMN: [q+Xl/c83QPeGG8ZbJYUBoYGLzAeTpkdn] X-Originating-Email: [carmel_ny@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ([76.182.104.150]) by BLU0-SMTP166.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 24 Aug 2013 03:05:04 -0700 Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: carmel_ny@seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3cMZpk5glwz2CG4k for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 06:05:02 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 06:05:02 -0400 From: Carmel To: FreeBSD Subject: slapd failing to start after update X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAHlBMVEUAAABYRlwJCw4FAgAIBwKprDkBAQFQLR0BAgCir7VRttp8AAACAUlEQVQ4jZWUTYvbMBCGTVl8V2hX6Gg5G5FbWQdBj0lEfE7BhN4cyzi5Wt1E5L70roWy6N92xok/skkP+5IYrMcz78xIduDWpNM3vFzuA/jX5EY1AI6KHFwW/CzFuQAwqUBbV12p+CzIh6Awq7sg33pn5D64SQXAexffeuQlA/L35RrkaB551OjGfP/cAO8mCNaDcgvfky5ijoD0pAXlCQCnljiAjsJD9Ax05Ko5sZxbnLQcmM+dZg5IjREfZrWIHK0JuwU68pAGwHvfRxBundRzTxxz3r9dNUikPsEihjz2Dc4kjp1hKsJGuot4EDxaxzMoC7XqhxhOSfZrTS6gSX1JVdjp+o1PvWfekXgw3WL0g70nDEwA0H0HQsEZc8sTmFMTkWUfYWC/vdR1zQy3xLQgLwzu90QnlnFLjeiGWBjwhb4Sa42IqOg2qqS4O1/zhKokFUb1Q8Rj4Eb69WVflXEehJ35DgChVTE5n50eaGyMLOfH8AOodoSM4PVYAQgQdBulOa+knklYks3vAuQ+uX492lTl+A+e8qBV2AKoXalVKFfyuUp0pUp1ARaUHh82lv9MN+Ig7CZtgE6FNYvjlywT2VP2dMgOG46gTIWcqdfvuwyXNz0oMJNd/N5lh1YNiJt19ADTUo3VuFSNeQwVqRSrGjSCp53fk2g+Mvfk/gfoPxHeUS8MH9vRAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Aug 2013 10:05:04.0527 (UTC) FILETIME=[676E71F0:01CEA0B1] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 10:06:11 -0000 I ran portupgrade last night to upgrade my ports. It upgraded both openldap24-server and openldap24-client. Now=2C the server refuses to start. Upon reboot=2C I get this message: "slapd failed to start". I went to the rc.d directory and tried to start it manually=2C but that failed also. I do not know where the log file=2C if one even exists=2C is so I might be able to find out what the problem is. I tried to manually deinstall and reinstall both ports and it went off without a hitch so I assume that they are properly installed. --=20 Carmel =E2=9C=8C carmel_ny@hotmail.com Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 24 11:31:20 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1996CFB for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 11:31:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carmel_ny@hotmail.com) Received: from blu0-omc4-s37.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc4-s37.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.176]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92BEA2922 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 11:31:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU0-SMTP224 ([65.55.111.135]) by blu0-omc4-s37.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 24 Aug 2013 04:30:14 -0700 X-TMN: [qEIH/sHVBWFfi0azYO3WdSbA6Aa9QOum] X-Originating-Email: [carmel_ny@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Received: from scorpio.seibercom.net ([76.182.104.150]) by BLU0-SMTP224.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Sat, 24 Aug 2013 04:30:13 -0700 Received: from scorpio (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: carmel_ny@seibercom.net) by scorpio.seibercom.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3cMcj02RMSz2CG4k for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 07:30:12 -0400 (EDT) Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 07:30:11 -0400 From: Carmel To: FreeBSD Subject: Re: slapd failing to start after update In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd8.3) Face: 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 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Aug 2013 11:30:13.0776 (UTC) FILETIME=[4CC7F900:01CEA0BD] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: FreeBSD List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 11:31:20 -0000 On Sat=2C 24 Aug 2013 06:05:02 -0400 Carmel articulated: > I ran portupgrade last night to upgrade my ports. It upgraded both > openldap24-server and openldap24-client. Now=2C the server refuses to > start. Upon reboot=2C I get this message: "slapd failed to start". I > went to the rc.d directory and tried to start it manually=2C but that > failed also. >=20 > I do not know where the log file=2C if one even exists=2C is so I might b= e > able to find out what the problem is. I tried to manually deinstall > and reinstall both ports and it went off without a hitch so I assume > that they are properly installed. Never mind=2C I found the problem. For the second time in the past several months=2C the database had become corrupt when I updated it via portupgrade. I discovered it when I ran this command: /usr/local/libexec/slapd -Tt I guess it was a good thing that I had a recent backup. --=20 Carmel =E2=9C=8C carmel_ny@hotmail.com Disclaimer: off-list followups get on-list replies or get ignored. Please do not ignore the "Reply-To" header. __________________________________________________________________ From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 24 16:05:23 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 308AFC6C for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 16:05:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vagabond@blackfoot.net) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2D802587 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 16:05:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id r7OG58cg093888 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 10:05:09 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from vagabond@blackfoot.net) Message-ID: <5218D9B4.1060003@blackfoot.net> Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 10:05:08 -0600 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130730 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: how to find where a port came from and rebuild with debug symbols Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Sat, 24 Aug 2013 10:05:09 -0600 (MDT) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 16:05:23 -0000 If I have a core file that implicates a library: #0 0x000000080525cab0 in wxWindow::DoSetSize () from /usr/local/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0 and #16 0x00000008056bf720 in wxAuiManager::Update () from /usr/local/lib/libwx_gtk2u_aui-2.8.so.0 and I want to find out which port these came from so I can rebuild it with debug symbols, how do I do that? $ nm -a /usr/local/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0 nm: /usr/local/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0: no symbols Clearly I'm doing something wrong there... So I try guessing: pkg_info pkg_info | grep gtk2 linux-f10-gtk2-2.14.7_4 GTK+ library, version 2.X (Linux Fedora 10) webkit-gtk2-1.8.3_2 An opensource browser engine wxgtk2-common-2.8.12_2 The wxWidgets GUI toolkit (common files) wxgtk2-unicode-2.8.12_2 The wxWidgets GUI toolkit (Unicode) more guessing: locate wxgtk2-common /var/db/pkg/wxgtk2-common-2.8.12_2 /var/db/pkg/wxgtk2-common-2.8.12_2/+COMMENT /var/db/pkg/wxgtk2-common-2.8.12_2/+CONTENTS /var/db/pkg/wxgtk2-common-2.8.12_2/+DESC /var/db/pkg/wxgtk2-common-2.8.12_2/+MTREE_DIRS /var/db/pkg/wxgtk2-common-2.8.12_2/+REQUIRED_BY /var/db/pkg/wxgtk2-common-2.8.12_2/distfiles After grousing around I find drwxr-xr-x 4 root wheel 512 Aug 24 09:38 x11-toolkits/wxgtk28 drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 8 10:51 x11-toolkits/wxgtk28-common drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Feb 17 2013 x11-toolkets/wxgtk28-contrib drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Feb 17 2013 x11-toolkits/wxgtk28-contrib-common drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Aug 8 10:51 x11-toolkits/wxgtk28-unicode drwxr-xr-x 2 root wheel 512 Feb 17 2013 x11-toolkits/wxgtk28-unicode-contrib After doing a make of x11-toolkits/wxgtk28 I find a bunch of lib*.so in ../work/wxGTK-2.8.12/lib and doing nm on them I discover what I want is in libwx_gtk2_aui-2.8.so libwx_gtk2_core-2.8.so However, neither of these exists in /usr/local/lib; only a bunch of other libux things. So.. ldd /usr/local/bin/hugin | grep libwx libwx_baseu-2.8.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libwx_baseu-2.8.so.0 (0x804d07000) libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0 (0x80506d000) libwx_gtk2u_aui-2.8.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libwx_gtk2u_aui-2.8.so.0 (0x80568e000) libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.8.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libwx_gtk2u_xrc-2.8.so.0 (0x805904000) libwx_gtk2u_html-2.8.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libwx_gtk2u_html-2.8.so.0 (0x805ba6000) libwx_baseu_xml-2.8.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libwx_baseu_xml-2.8.so.0 (0x805e65000) libwx_gtk2u_adv-2.8.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libwx_gtk2u_adv-2.8.so.0 (0x80606f000) libwx_gtk2u_gl-2.8.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libwx_gtk2u_gl-2.8.so.0 (0x806356000) libwx_baseu_net-2.8.so.0 => /usr/local/lib/libwx_baseu_net-2.8.so.0 (0x806564000) help? And, assuming I find the right port, how do I rebuild / install it with symbols left in? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 24 16:12:03 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07AB4FD1 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 16:12:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org) Received: from hoffman.proper.com (IPv6.Hoffman.Proper.COM [IPv6:2605:8e00:100:41::81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D447825F2 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 16:12:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.20.30.90] (50-1-98-185.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.1.98.185]) (authenticated bits=0) by hoffman.proper.com (8.14.7/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r7OGC04h001631 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 09:12:01 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from paul.hoffman@vpnc.org) X-Authentication-Warning: hoffman.proper.com: Host 50-1-98-185.dsl.dynamic.sonic.net [50.1.98.185] claimed to be [10.20.30.90] Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\)) Subject: Re: Finding exactly which commands, and in which order, rc is running at startup From: Paul Hoffman In-Reply-To: <4237C275-EFFE-437C-8332-43FA91FDE718@lafn.org> Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 09:12:01 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <4896463E-A9E3-4BD5-97AC-628AAFA9D1ED@proper.com> <4237C275-EFFE-437C-8332-43FA91FDE718@lafn.org> To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 16:12:03 -0000 Thanks for all the suggestions. Of them, this was the one that helped me = with my issue: On Aug 23, 2013, at 1:41 AM, Doug Hardie wrote: > You can add: >=20 > rc_debug=3D"YES" >=20 > to /etc/rc.conf and that might give you what you need. According to = the man page it will "produces copious output to the terminal and = syslog(3)" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 24 17:48:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9319ABA9 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 17:48:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from illoai@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-x230.google.com (mail-pa0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F9E12AC1 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 17:48:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f48.google.com with SMTP id kp13so1865327pab.35 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 10:48:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Vq44eJXKBC/6a3TiE/zo/UqdezLoq0BtumPwGOTxWBU=; b=ulDevLhpFxmchrw53WKZgIroScuNWOlAv9uhRf+9Ysjy/VNNJvdBMKW5zgqRzKBICW E6dzDNZL5h+6OqyvHyJFvChmcQh6OZbivKu8eHxfJPob8YzBOIzEZo4XrBlwcXj74T1t RwFffXFoFTTHPPFGACLJyPqpZVNYPjkNp4eh58L+XAeD13OlKZPvftOX3otORg5T2wU4 w9FAsaUoMt8SmrhRLm08H/xZPjwOG+C8YvIGzLf1PF6Jl9Ka8EjZkNysqjIK1JyzkgW/ xpFHw1zmmnu2t1k0IgbO6IptESzByYHILPpof51BRzvSYstrUezIaftLZe2ZCBlMMjvb Uo+g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.122.40 with SMTP id lp8mr5263946pab.82.1377366490863; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 10:48:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.129.99 with HTTP; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 10:48:10 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5218D9B4.1060003@blackfoot.net> References: <5218D9B4.1060003@blackfoot.net> Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 13:48:10 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: how to find where a port came from and rebuild with debug symbols From: "illoai@gmail.com" To: Gary Aitken Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 17:48:11 -0000 On 24 August 2013 12:05, Gary Aitken wrote: > If I have a core file that implicates a library: > #0 0x000000080525cab0 in wxWindow::DoSetSize () from /usr/local/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0 > and > #16 0x00000008056bf720 in wxAuiManager::Update () from /usr/local/lib/libwx_gtk2u_aui-2.8.so.0 > > and I want to find out which port these came from so I can rebuild it > with debug symbols, how do I do that? As to the first look at pkg-which(8): % pkg which /usr/local/lib/libwx_gtk2_aui-2.8.so.0 /usr/local/lib/libwx_gtk2_aui-2.8.so.0 was installed by package wxgtk2-2.8.12_2 % pkg which -o /usr/local/lib/libwx_gtk2_aui-2.8.so.0 /usr/local/lib/libwx_gtk2_aui-2.8.so.0 was installed by package x11-toolkits/wxgtk28 (the -q flag makes it all lovely & terse) As to the second: I don't know, some ports have an option to build with debug symbols, but if not you might have to edit some Makefiles, or worse. -- -- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 24 18:39:05 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C19A168C for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 18:39:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 71B5E2CE7 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 18:39:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id r7OIcogB042588; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 12:38:50 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id r7OIcoZh042585; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 12:38:50 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 12:38:50 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block To: "illoai@gmail.com" Subject: Re: how to find where a port came from and rebuild with debug symbols In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: <5218D9B4.1060003@blackfoot.net> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 24 Aug 2013 12:38:50 -0600 (MDT) Cc: Gary Aitken , FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 18:39:05 -0000 On Sat, 24 Aug 2013, illoai@gmail.com wrote: > On 24 August 2013 12:05, Gary Aitken wrote: >> If I have a core file that implicates a library: >> #0 0x000000080525cab0 in wxWindow::DoSetSize () from /usr/local/lib/libwx_gtk2u_core-2.8.so.0 >> and >> #16 0x00000008056bf720 in wxAuiManager::Update () from /usr/local/lib/libwx_gtk2u_aui-2.8.so.0 >> >> and I want to find out which port these came from so I can rebuild it >> with debug symbols, how do I do that? > > As to the first look at pkg-which(8): > % pkg which /usr/local/lib/libwx_gtk2_aui-2.8.so.0 > /usr/local/lib/libwx_gtk2_aui-2.8.so.0 was installed by package wxgtk2-2.8.12_2 > % pkg which -o /usr/local/lib/libwx_gtk2_aui-2.8.so.0 > /usr/local/lib/libwx_gtk2_aui-2.8.so.0 was installed by package > x11-toolkits/wxgtk28 > (the -q flag makes it all lovely & terse) > > As to the second: > I don't know, some ports have an option to build with debug symbols, but if not > you might have to edit some Makefiles, or worse. Can't you just add WITH_DEBUG=yes to the make command or make.conf? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 24 19:05:03 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B44BD1B for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 19:05:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bounces+612829-b51e-questions=freebsd.org@sendgrid.info) Received: from o2.bn.sendgrid.net (o2.bn.sendgrid.net [208.115.214.177]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 522EB2E0C for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 19:05:02 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=sendgrid.me; h=from:to :subject:mime-version:content-type; s=smtpapi; bh=T+XFKI7hIcVxw6 XgwHJYmonE8XY=; b=yIVQd4xaTd/s8p+FbSoyRxz1AFMNXvBtyGAqrMiR+xCzPA o2hdrnXNAc7keuzk9W2IM24A6W+i/zBhIFs59vCyzH+XTPfw3u72VnyuMDn/72xD W37L8XC20SoWglfhQEuKuZcv671MI71PmAl/EJ8aTP4aazi7brBadsv5GvLk8= Received: by with SMTP id filter-145.12506.521903DA2 Sat, 24 Aug 2013 19:04:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from (ool-ad034738.dyn.optonline.net [173.3.71.56]) by mi13 (SG) with ESMTP id 140b1b70b3c.526.279159 for ; Sat, 24 Aug 2013 19:04:57 +0000 (UTC) From: TheUrbanShopper To: Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 15:04:45 -0400 Subject: IN THIS ISSUE: Back to School Fashions for Grownups | Autism's Social Side | Susu Saving | Outdoor Party Recipes X-Mailer: TOL Mailer MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=_0_.__.__TOL__Mailer__Part_Boundary_ Message-ID: <1377371098.2963906447931328@filter-145.sjc1.sendgrid.net> X-SG-EID: kupi+C8b7X4XcIgkd08EEI9U+3nO0snAQOkGcdEKlYqowMl5UvbhP++OOwzU4CjDgZBxnoB1/TonszgMqpKywP3mrQEcZZz/cE30ilIlmJ314p7QmEJdo2daHvcKqtwFzz3+dAE875G6X6+a2JSGZg== X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 19:05:03 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --_0_.__.__TOL__Mailer__Part_Boundary_ Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary=_1_.__.__TOL__Mailer__Part_Boundary_ --_1_.__.__TOL__Mailer__Part_Boundary_ Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Untitled Document
Having trouble reading this email? Click Here to go direct to TheUrbanShopper.com.
To ensure delivery, please add us@theurbanshopper.com to your Safe Sender List or Address Book.
TheUrbanShopper Newsletter
You have received this update as a subscriber to TheUrbanShopper.com. Ensure inbox delivery by adding us@theurbanshopper.com to your SAFE SENDER or email CONTACTS list. If you'd like to unsubscribe . For more information, please read our Privacy Policy . ©2013 All Rights Reserved
--_1_.__.__TOL__Mailer__Part_Boundary_-- --_0_.__.__TOL__Mailer__Part_Boundary_--