From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 10 02:16:15 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57DB4CCD for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 02:16:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from appleempire19@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qe0-x233.google.com (mail-qe0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c02::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A9972FBE for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 02:16:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qe0-f51.google.com with SMTP id t7so224876qeb.10 for ; Sat, 09 Nov 2013 18:16:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:from:message-id:date :to:mime-version; bh=PH8gytCKfX07krLvD/knHElY//VglekKyvKqtalLu9c=; b=hP3ZNSCl7GUVFgmu+hQBFPJEfjPffeAZGa9cPKoIJFstcP56yjcJrzuJYksFRQT9vd 1NMz7PoZSVerHyQ49FSwvQujGWBNgiZOANT8g5giGixvBUQOaQuhAcAnjH1y5x5D7vv+ 8kuiZMyEzIHHVrS+8WK3WwkJ93IuctoAdqmAXzVkS7JouRIau9xJdsfH+oKeyxmHyU2F EISv1uF32gMG9v2TL8ffOtSaaSxCynNjfJ0CD6kBMcYBWXwy+klynMfMpCO2/lCbQc5X aTQNU005whAKH0TNFJk295yS8IlCqP1ZkIsVpu7Dkf1B44rU+EMeQXaiCj+lvbtmwfhA DCSA== X-Received: by 10.224.11.68 with SMTP id s4mr37150133qas.88.1384049774371; Sat, 09 Nov 2013 18:16:14 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.0.13] (c-24-126-198-115.hsd1.ga.comcast.net. [24.126.198.115]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id s46sm27811961yha.27.2013.11.09.18.16.13 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 09 Nov 2013 18:16:13 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Ownership copyrights From: appleempire19@gmail.com Message-Id: <5F28EB69-7B15-44A0-9119-C974FF7C647A@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 9 Nov 2013 21:16:10 -0500 To: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (11A501) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 02:16:15 -0000 How long would it take get rights to use the FreeBSD kernel and all software= associated with it sole ownership.= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 10 03:26:59 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F49A08 for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 03:26:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6721@twc.com) Received: from cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.166.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 673582311 for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 03:26:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [74.130.196.19] ([74.130.196.19:31442] helo=localhost) by cdptpa-oedge03 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.5.0.35861 r(Momo-dev:tip)) with ESMTP id BB/D4-19454-CFCFE725; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 03:26:52 +0000 Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 03:26:52 +0000 Message-ID: From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org References: <5F28EB69-7B15-44A0-9119-C974FF7C647A@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Ownership copyrights X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.142:25 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 Cc: appleempire19@gmail.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 03:26:59 -0000 from appleempire19@gmail.com: > How long would it take get rights to use the FreeBSD kernel and all software associated with it sole ownership. You already have the right to use the FreeBSD kernel and all associated software, but you can't keep it from others to do likewise. FreeBSD is open-source, freely downloadable, and you can also buy installation media. Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 10 08:14:49 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0D69866 for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 08:14:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6721@twc.com) Received: from cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.166.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DC9F2C86 for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 08:14:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [74.130.196.19] ([74.130.196.19:38692] helo=localhost) by cdptpa-oedge03 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.5.0.35861 r(Momo-dev:tip)) with ESMTP id 78/D4-19454-7704F725; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 08:14:47 +0000 Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 08:14:47 +0000 Message-ID: <78.D4.19454.7704F725@cdptpa-oedge03> From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Problem with wireless router inaccessibility X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.142:25 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 08:14:49 -0000 I have a problem where I can no longer log in to my Netgear wireless router from computer in living room, and computer in bedroom, connected to the same router with a 25 ft Ethernet cable, can't connect from any OS where it previously was successful (NetBSD-current amd64 and Linux on System Rescue CD). I can still access the Internet and browse from FreeBSD on living-room computer, but can't log in to the router. I'm afraid to reboot for fear that I could never regain Internet access. It's possible that rebooting could resolve the problem, but there is the risk of not being able to get back in. I don't know if the wireless router is going bad, or if its IP address (192.168.1.1) has changed. I could order a new router online while I still have Internet access. Now I'm trying to decide whether the router is going bad or if FreeBSD stumbled on itself. Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 10 11:19:25 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D666996 for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 11:19:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.e.sanliturk@gmail.com) Received: from mail-vc0-x229.google.com (mail-vc0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c03::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F29112455 for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 11:19:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-vc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id hu8so2631678vcb.28 for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 03:19:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=19r6d3LQDxlTmt5yphNaos2AYVHsFKF2m97g6OnniSU=; b=WQYiLynQTdtLFdgRnuhkI+6MGES7sk1rKFSiWKPTzBwkneTtMPp4oXdoZWW/N6Ib6/ 0zfaLJjirYIXU74FyS5T6uj0pLXD6YHFNqqbit5blRiJlK327GJFYSd05dyYY8RPM3/3 vSrmCT4JJ2O1Oui8DFOsUqi3xjGlvAthdlANcG6X0o/rB9BtxWuHrKqpytttUMjqVAJk UlJFuM4BsvYbc5aStF2WHe6hzsir4D7wWp7oQp6t35PSyAWMOfYM8hCUsxXXPdenc7Yc 3eUADTDg6a2MLD0qbJ9Dr1f80oQHWCkQu4/32pkno0igtpNwAX6mDDu0EMYMKjCipODL PbMw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.58.156.106 with SMTP id wd10mr19901326veb.7.1384082364066; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 03:19:24 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.59.3.74 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 03:19:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5F28EB69-7B15-44A0-9119-C974FF7C647A@gmail.com> References: <5F28EB69-7B15-44A0-9119-C974FF7C647A@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 06:19:24 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Ownership copyrights From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk To: appleempire19@gmail.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: "freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 11:19:25 -0000 On Sat, Nov 9, 2013 at 9:16 PM, wrote: > How long would it take get rights to use the FreeBSD kernel and all > software associated with it sole ownership. > >From your question , it is understood that you do NOT have any idea about "LAW" : First , please read information in the page : http://www.freebsd.org/copyright/ In summary : FreeBSD is an open-source project with its "Copyright" and "License" . With respect to these , there is NO any SOLE OWNERSHIP transfer possibility for the prior works. For NEW works , you should find EACH developer and BUY their developments with a PROHIBITION agreement that the sole owner of their works are you if they accept such an offer . This action does NOT prevent others to develop FreeBSD sources any further . Then , best action for you to ask to a lawyer before asking such a question and learn its rules . With this knowledge level , you are very open to be misleaded and waste your resources , because in the world , you may find persons which they will try to sell to you even Freedom Monument of the USA , let alone FreeBSD sole ownership . Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 10 12:51:50 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 303B73E6 for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 12:51:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from juris.kaminskis@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wg0-x232.google.com (mail-wg0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE9B128C4 for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 12:51:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f50.google.com with SMTP id k14so1986220wgh.5 for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 04:51:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=w6M0vjdu1+dj0M68J63LV31Jc/osbhGjD4EJb1WtuBk=; b=RKMGyAYBmBJG51XiOwFZ8/S7UQ/qNkyZ455Ggtv0BvPkF8hx8FsubzKhAh6fmbn8Re wIFWdzLKCIpRj147/PLNBV7SBXjTbDXJzcl+1cqIt3R2wd1VLpeMcTR9bBtoCBv/Zl4C BRRlcqa1ZIL6aJjqDtW5lR1yZ3atSK4kNrbNzFoHJD62qMFRsndezTmfXyfCAIj69toP mjjvanlLkXUzEgNtEgD3tg39GTKpghYl51bQNxMEFw9CLvlfgRovl5abNgkSBAwJ2zS3 x8G1ag5ngaMbVwccwQN13fZqgOEOF8mkbJU9anRrwZWLe/3WLCX3Z0QWORwEhCDoPgtL 4oUg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.109.167 with SMTP id ht7mr14584526wjb.5.1384087908178; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 04:51:48 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.194.185.101 with HTTP; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 04:51:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20131105190317.2588.qmail@irelay.ssr.com> Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 14:51:48 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Share NTFS drive over NFS From: Juris Kaminskis To: krad Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 12:51:50 -0000 this thread is solved by http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAKJAkzsdWqfvrn_1wOrDOH6nxnDaNo96rSS48jKDbscFRqEShA kernel NFS does not work with NTFS so user soft like unfs3 must be used. I tried with unfs3 and it worked. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 10 16:49:21 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A59FB9 for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 16:49:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B094E243D for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 16:49:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rAAGnIES090892; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 09:49:18 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id rAAGnIhx090889; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 09:49:18 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 09:49:18 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Thomas Mueller Subject: Re: Problem with wireless router inaccessibility In-Reply-To: <78.D4.19454.7704F725@cdptpa-oedge03> Message-ID: References: <78.D4.19454.7704F725@cdptpa-oedge03> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sun, 10 Nov 2013 09:49:18 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 16:49:21 -0000 On Sun, 10 Nov 2013, Thomas Mueller wrote: > I have a problem where I can no longer log in to my Netgear wireless > router from computer in living room, and computer in bedroom, > connected to the same router with a 25 ft Ethernet cable, can't > connect from any OS where it previously was successful (NetBSD-current > amd64 and Linux on System Rescue CD). > > I can still access the Internet and browse from FreeBSD on living-room computer, but can't log in to the router. > > I'm afraid to reboot for fear that I could never regain Internet access. At worst, replacing the router should fix it. > It's possible that rebooting could resolve the problem, but there is the risk of not being able to get back in. > > I don't know if the wireless router is going bad, or if its IP address (192.168.1.1) has changed. It can't be that, because one computer can still use it as a gateway to get to the net. > I could order a new router online while I still have Internet access. > > Now I'm trying to decide whether the router is going bad or if FreeBSD stumbled on itself. Run ifconfig on the working computer to see the IP address it was assigned by DHCP, and compare that to the not-working systems. Consumer-grade routers frequently have poor firmware and need relatively frequent resets. Some also have poor power supplies that are prone to failure. Replacing the firmware with DD-WRT or Tomato makes for a much more reliable unit. Power supply testing can be done by swapping with another unit. My experience with the Netgear consumer wireless routers has not been great. If you can find one, the good old WRT54G is still an excellent unit. These are often available at thrift stores and yard sales. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 10 20:23:58 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CFC61DE for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 20:23:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cwhiteh@onetel.com) Received: from anakin.london.02.net (anakin.london.02.net [87.194.255.134]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 684062F98 for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 20:23:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.2.50] (78.86.156.94) by anakin.london.02.net (8.5.140) id 51DAA72802FE4B7C for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 20:22:17 +0000 Message-ID: <527FEAF9.70300@onetel.com> Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 20:22:17 +0000 From: Chris Whitehouse User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111228 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with wireless router inaccessibility References: <78.D4.19454.7704F725@cdptpa-oedge03> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 20:23:58 -0000 On 10/11/2013 16:49, Warren Block wrote: > On Sun, 10 Nov 2013, Thomas Mueller wrote: > >> I have a problem where I can no longer log in to my Netgear wireless >> router from computer in living room, and computer in bedroom, >> connected to the same router with a 25 ft Ethernet cable, can't >> connect from any OS where it previously was successful (NetBSD-current >> amd64 and Linux on System Rescue CD). >> >> I can still access the Internet and browse from FreeBSD on living-room >> computer, but can't log in to the router. >> >> I'm afraid to reboot for fear that I could never regain Internet access. > > At worst, replacing the router should fix it. Less worse, most routers have a pin-through-a-hole operated physical switch which resets the unit to factory defaults - if you don't have the original manual a web search will usually find the default username and password to login. After resetting you can connect to the unit via ethernet, from a machine whose ip address you set to the same network as the unit's default ip address, then log in with default user/pass. You will of course lose any custom settings like your SSID. > >> It's possible that rebooting could resolve the problem, but there is >> the risk of not being able to get back in. It could but if it doesn't you should be able to get in as above. Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 10 23:10:13 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 996BB45A for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 23:10:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-questions@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A0682863 for ; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 23:10:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vfe8p-0000dD-SU for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 00:10:03 +0100 Received: from 65.75.36.70 ([65.75.36.70]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 00:10:03 +0100 Received: from gyliamos by 65.75.36.70 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 00:10:03 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Will Parsons Subject: Re: Problem with wireless router inaccessibility Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 21:59:14 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 25 Message-ID: References: <78.D4.19454.7704F725@cdptpa-oedge03> X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.75.36.70 User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: gyliamos@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 23:10:13 -0000 Thomas Mueller wrote: > I have a problem where I can no longer log in to my Netgear wireless router from computer in living room, and computer in bedroom, connected to the same router with a 25 ft Ethernet cable, can't connect from any OS where it previously was successful (NetBSD-current amd64 and Linux on System Rescue CD). > > I can still access the Internet and browse from FreeBSD on living-room computer, but can't log in to the router. > > I'm afraid to reboot for fear that I could never regain Internet access. > > It's possible that rebooting could resolve the problem, but there is the risk of not being able to get back in. > > I don't know if the wireless router is going bad, or if its IP > address (192.168.1.1) has changed. Are you sure it's 192.168.1.1? I have a Netgear router, and the manual falsely claims that that address is the default IP address, but I'm pretty sure that the real default was 10.0.0.1 (can't be sure for certain, since I've since changed it). This may be not relevant to your situation, but I recently had a problem in that I disabled the option on the router to serve as a DHCP server (for reasons that I will not go into), and found that I could no longer reach the router, even via Ethernet. (Solution was to set a static IP address and default route in /etc/rc.conf.) -- Will From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 11 00:15:38 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACE5946C for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 00:15:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from land.berklix.org (land.berklix.org [144.76.10.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39A1E2BD2 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 00:15:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (pD9FBEBC4.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [217.251.235.196]) (authenticated bits=128) by land.berklix.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rAB0FUWJ074730 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 00:15:30 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id rAB0FGu9028409 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 01:15:16 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost.js.berklix.net [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rAB0FAXt065014 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 01:15:16 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201311110015.rAB0FAXt065014@fire.js.berklix.net> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Ownership copyrights From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Sun, 10 Nov 2013 06:19:24 EST." Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 01:15:10 +0100 Sender: jhs@berklix.com X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 00:15:38 -0000 Don't feed the troll: Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultant, Munich http://berklix.com Interleave replies below like a play script. Indent old text with "> ". Send plain text, not quoted-printable, HTML, base64, or multipart/alternative. Extradite NSA spy chief Alexander. http://berklix.eu/jhs/blog/2013_10_30 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 11 05:41:46 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BAAA7F2 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 05:41:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sreeramabs@yahoo.com) Received: from nm8-vm0.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm8-vm0.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.91.23]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BC3A2A7C for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 05:41:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.138.101.129] by nm8.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Nov 2013 05:41:38 -0000 Received: from [98.138.101.161] by tm17.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Nov 2013 05:41:38 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1072.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Nov 2013 05:41:38 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 362536.64996.bm@omp1072.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 61837 invoked by uid 60001); 11 Nov 2013 05:41:38 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1384148498; bh=l7zvhF8HwmsjVLjoLHrurT2fHjR0t8+RWoA2rOd9nsg=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=fnms1RH8XFjfzhi9wE+j43M0VVKzZ3sHeqp2Dynq8YkOwyUvQPewNWpeS5aVOzPAK2l9f3hn2GawYLr7+VqaU7I3BL2aZDjSbrVTqN2Cp+tOxtB6PeJFHVBQuOgHPJIoHv09xp3eH5Kwp+qUrtW2R6M71EwnHX8zrAjNyYcl1JA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=lvZD4JFuxhcTrRsKY1EbjCsamCyCmNzD7PPg/1zFABwZBNukYfOoziKhK7x/ZhX8p1HTDOqzZEqT1hzhVz1onUuvR/pRxXsr+VqsqYMeOi0zIxuzrf0hqWKaEyV7zDr/23IwuogaR48Ub214yLxzczMF/5vw1Omql9PkT/vz5XU=; X-YMail-OSG: msPvwCIVM1mAqLZH.wS6NFw_n7ISu1mJPWnbFqpEBfZn4Hx eeOMFdO1q2FMCsC9Q6Cb6GRGwCb6E4mKugxVd21ojlonjmiHxO1xmfiJVZ2U lD9otFR3rJj7p4XQ0VsXmFOY6br2_TMvLMWgtlYCwsWSf_q_l6_O7FFKNWu2 LVHKYQoG4zvg1HGnuLw2i8FreqzBzz_PpTgCzmyBkq7YHPMhdqEIaRRXRgFv jIkspIIUcgeXq9xTDD7JhMTQYQkg58EbhIlxCu9pmtdyOnS.vxn1MsFnGWQk .ym4AMu1_gLSPwRUkdy25D5iZxBtVPdLnQ8EmKCYrYQjeik9tN.r4Vm.ZNzW hhluCPtATW8BRROaZDSpXi0B4xFc9PUrSZKbLlp90hApJqpRHGZtlk4ezvVq NVjfbtK3LN1XXpoo6yPRTTWa05qlofIO7AURUqygvaFqpkuzTFCk8sjkgPzX yya1WXLAC06CJLpcaV9.8hfcttqgNEZUS.ot3uRYDVUk6eXA0rGMFrOqAoxn rN_PFwkxMQHhlC5IiIismc6IM8fMN3j5ZZeqfWKLMfQnUpbyRVaaT_Kfwojn 7y9ISFAh.O51LM.rR_ALkvi1pFCVk6uBMRWEHvQsN8CbyKDPSdcbZsr8VhS3 VtATL_sVmJIL_fnUdsjdRE6smL7Qhmzjn4I3fjNVy Received: from [202.3.120.4] by web125401.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Sun, 10 Nov 2013 21:41:38 PST X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001, SGksCsKgIMKgIMKgSSBoYXZlIDIgcXVlc3Rpb25zIHJlbGF0ZWQgdG8gc291cmNlIGNvZGUgb2Ygc3RhbmRhcmQgcHJvZ3JhbXMoY29tbWFuZHMpIG9mIEZyZWVCU0QuwqAKCigxKSBBc3N1bWluZyBJIHdvdWxkIGxpa2UgdG8gZ2V0IHRoZSBzb3VyY2UgY29kZSBvZiBwcm9ncmFtICd0YWlsJywgdGhlbiBJIHZpc2l0IHRoaXMgVVJMwqBodHRwOi8vc3Zud2ViLmZyZWVic2Qub3JnL2Jhc2UvaGVhZC91c3IuYmluL8KgYW5kIGVudGVyIHRoZSDCoCd0YWlsJyBzdWItZGlyZWN0b3J5LiBIZXJlIEkgc2VlIHRoZSABMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.163.597 Message-ID: <1384148498.43725.YahooMailNeo@web125401.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2013 21:41:38 -0800 (PST) From: Sreeram BS Subject: Source code version To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Sreeram BS List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 05:41:46 -0000 Hi,=0A=A0 =A0 =A0I have 2 questions related to source code of standard prog= rams(commands) of FreeBSD.=A0=0A=0A(1) Assuming I would like to get the sou= rce code of program 'tail', then I visit this URL=A0http://svnweb.freebsd.o= rg/base/head/usr.bin/=A0and enter the =A0'tail' sub-directory. Here I see t= he tail.c file, but there is a version number(revision-number) next to it a= nd that is the actual link for the program. Now, this version number is dif= ferent for different utilities. For example, the latest version of tail.c i= s 251565, whereas the latest version of another program, 'basename' is 2163= 70.=0A=A0 =A0 My question is, is there a common path which can take us to t= he latest version of these programs? For example:=A0http://svnweb.freebsd.o= rg/base/head/usr.bin/tail/tail.c?revision=3DLATEST ?=0A=0A(2) Is there a wa= y, where I can get the revision number of source code of a program shipped = in a particular release. For example, 'tail' is present in FreeBSD9 and Fre= eBSD8 also ('tail' is present in all FreeBSD releases, and so picking that = as an example). The source code for 'tail' in FreeBSD8 could be different f= rom the one in FreeBSD9. Is there a way to obtain the revision number of ta= il.c program that was shipped in FreeBSD8 (or FreeBSD9).=0A=0APlease sugges= t and inform.=0A=0ARegards,=0ASreeram From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 11 07:08:59 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17A60510 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 07:08:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94B992ECF for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 07:08:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rAB78qTC013264 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 07:08:53 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk rAB78qTC013264 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1384153733; bh=WZ9a4efL7wed2zbg6KpgRE9LxRwDxuitKdddWIWmRZU=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; z=Date:=20Mon,=2011=20Nov=202013=2007:08:52=20+0000|From:=20Matthew =20Seaman=20|To:=20freebsd-questi ons@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20Source=20code=20version|Reference s:=20<1384148498.43725.YahooMailNeo@web125401.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>| In-Reply-To:=20<1384148498.43725.YahooMailNeo@web125401.mail.ne1.y ahoo.com>; b=D4tcJBXA7yxTfoJP8lcwtk/2jISXsEvbumoaKxKbzrg4JG48KqjZ85szE7rL/2Tei zFz4721QKULB6zVKGOgR3/9VbZdzzbqiK3g7yEa06aqfMFmlApLf3Fgx8uyHWVqRee X72ESushevd+WVZ9UTH3Ab/Bvxb9U9hQITN+n7bs= Message-ID: <52808284.8070705@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 07:08:52 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Source code version References: <1384148498.43725.YahooMailNeo@web125401.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1384148498.43725.YahooMailNeo@web125401.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 OpenPGP: id=E7F39EBF Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WuoU3fIn4GE39bDqXCGVNfn2Mbt5BsbUD" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.8 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 07:08:59 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --WuoU3fIn4GE39bDqXCGVNfn2Mbt5BsbUD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11/11/2013 05:41, Sreeram BS wrote: > I have 2 questions related to source code of standard > programs(commands) of FreeBSD. >=20 > (1) Assuming I would like to get the source code of program 'tail', > then I visit this URL http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/usr.bin/ and > enter the 'tail' sub-directory. Here I see the tail.c file, but there > is a version number(revision-number) next to it and that is the > actual link for the program. Now, this version number is different > for different utilities. For example, the latest version of tail.c is > 251565, whereas the latest version of another program, 'basename' is > 216370. > My question is, is there a common path which can take us to the > latest version of these programs? For example: > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/usr.bin/tail/tail.c?revision=3DLATE= ST ? >=20 > (2) Is there a way, where I can get the revision number of source > code of a program shipped in a particular release. For example, > 'tail' is present in FreeBSD9 and FreeBSD8 also ('tail' is present in > all FreeBSD releases, and so picking that as an example). The source > code for 'tail' in FreeBSD8 could be different from the one in > FreeBSD9. Is there a way to obtain the revision number of tail.c > program that was shipped in FreeBSD8 (or FreeBSD9). Conceptual misunderstanding. Individual programs in the FreeBSD base system do not have separate version numbers (except for certain vendor imports). Instead, the whole tree has an overall revision number[*]. The revision listed in any file is the version of the whole tree at the time that file was last changed. So to get the latest version of any file, just check out the latest version of the source tree. Cheers, Matthew [*] This is a consequence of the shift to svn(1). There used to be individual per-file version numbers under CVS, but that's something most modern VCSes have moved away from. --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk --WuoU3fIn4GE39bDqXCGVNfn2Mbt5BsbUD Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJSgIKEXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkAT3XYQAJtvfUzZ++3YilEVoUtT17mU PxN3YVS3GoM9Db7hW9wPbbtFPbS3NkAsUGNtOVpaeOE1eARF04qomwPdQvoQjzGJ YgFYuREph2SYRVgZW5ajY95TX5nAYGqrACXxyBcHrEam62fQz1sYeb9qoUq3Il2C PbEBQqnV29rvzLjtQdapZ6R8/xVQdXs/H9udNgpmUMVkXB5MKXxFekwwKQu7bjVE qniUce5B274b0oJIbkO43gKqc7y+Raf5mbl2KUM2iBfthzuRJk95GKxKKgrTia7q 0wwNJn3FBvsOeiq4yErKZjPxEVu6DFP4qUOFi8ilHY8oXfFLkG9fXhsL2aRWaLE9 sIwj+gxWkcJiuE8m1tToQc9gKkX8kc1+XtMIhgkctqZr/MhdP67FiPq4ziBacYKx Auy4bsNOv2bUe6kYfKEYHuiXdQyC6Gz6lUQff0tfVlzLYtaqDvz+iE8GIPFa0nr2 syEdhkMCoS4Ow7kgpANeElWn2eOEGl2hGRkDE0UZJnO+/oz72L6o3affmeQTh9jc bWf02iRDgeZuNuG771fllPxuOprE1icIY4xfs6mlrOarPz8LzyEhgYsAVfDi2yDK xz/43NIVKFDsnE2EIpQ3mjqFMVbMLp+3l0GIfaSQ03Ol0UeSUc4m311aujaBfnKo 29XNI1rqQp5WTWps/6F1 =rc4W -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WuoU3fIn4GE39bDqXCGVNfn2Mbt5BsbUD-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 11 07:38:48 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6031795 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 07:38:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@shaneware.biz) Received: from ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net [IPv6:2001:44b8:8060:ff02:300:1:2:6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CE662074 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 07:38:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ppp118-210-43-157.lns20.adl2.internode.on.net (HELO leader.local) ([118.210.43.157]) by ipmail06.adl2.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 11 Nov 2013 18:08:45 +1030 Message-ID: <52808981.20102@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 18:08:41 +1030 From: Shane Ambler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Sreeram BS , "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Source code version References: <1384148498.43725.YahooMailNeo@web125401.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <1384148498.43725.YahooMailNeo@web125401.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 07:38:49 -0000 On 11/11/2013 16:11, Sreeram BS wrote: > Hi, I have 2 questions related to source code of standard > programs(commands) of FreeBSD. > > (1) Assuming I would like to get the source code of program 'tail', > then I visit this URL http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/usr.bin/ > and enter the 'tail' sub-directory. Here I see the tail.c file, but > there is a version number(revision-number) next to it and that is > the actual link for the program. Now, this version number is > different for different utilities. For example, the latest version of > tail.c is 251565, whereas the latest version of another program, > 'basename' is 216370. My question is, is there a common path which > can take us to the latest version of these programs? For example: > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/usr.bin/tail/tail.c?revision=LATEST? > Using ...usr.bin/tail/tail.c will show the revision log and ...usr.bin/tail/tail.c?view=markup will show the source for the file as of the latest revision. > (2) Is there a way, where I can get the revision number of source > code of a program shipped in a particular release. For example, > 'tail' is present in FreeBSD9 and FreeBSD8 also ('tail' is present > in all FreeBSD releases, and so picking that as an example). The > source code for 'tail' in FreeBSD8 could be different from the one > in FreeBSD9. Is there a way to obtain the revision number of tail.c > program that was shipped in FreeBSD8 (or FreeBSD9). You have several options for accessing different release versions all use the filepath. base/head/... is the newest development release/x.y.z/... is a specific release version releng/x.y/... is the release version with updates often called patch levels - that is minor (usually security) updates available through freebsd-update - eg 9.1-RELEASE-p3 will be available at releng/9.1 Not sure of a list of svn revision numbers for each release, but to see the code used you should use the releng/x.y not revision xxx from head From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 11 09:56:39 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EF9615E for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 09:56:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mueller6721@twc.com) Received: from cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.166.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBC522838 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 09:56:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [74.130.196.19] ([74.130.196.19:13630] helo=localhost) by cdptpa-oedge03 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.5.0.35861 r(Momo-dev:tip)) with ESMTP id 6A/C3-19454-0D9A0825; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 09:56:32 +0000 Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 09:56:32 +0000 Message-ID: <6A.C3.19454.0D9A0825@cdptpa-oedge03> From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org References: <78.D4.19454.7704F725@cdptpa-oedge03> <527FEAF9.70300@onetel.com> Subject: Re: Problem with wireless router inaccessibility X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.142:25 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 09:56:39 -0000 from Warren Block and my original post: > > I can still access the Internet and browse from FreeBSD on living-room computer, but can't log in to the router. > > I'm afraid to reboot for fear that I could never regain Internet access. > At worst, replacing the router should fix it. > > It's possible that rebooting could resolve the problem, but there is the risk of not being able to get back in. > > I don't know if the wireless router is going bad, or if its IP address (192.168.1.1) has changed. > It can't be that, because one computer can still use it as a gateway > to get to the net. > > I could order a new router online while I still have Internet access. > > Now I'm trying to decide whether the router is going bad or if FreeBSD stumbled on itself. > Run ifconfig on the working computer to see the IP address it was > assigned by DHCP, and compare that to the not-working systems. > Consumer-grade routers frequently have poor firmware and need > relatively frequent resets. Some also have poor power supplies that > are prone to failure. Replacing the firmware with DD-WRT or Tomato > makes for a much more reliable unit. Power supply testing can be done > by swapping with another unit. > My experience with the Netgear consumer wireless routers has not been > great. If you can find one, the good old WRT54G is still an excellent > unit. These are often available at thrift stores and yard sales. Now with FreeBSD 9.2_STABLE not rebooted on living-room computer, I can log in to router from bedroom computer with http://192.168.1.1 using System Rescue CD with Midori web browser, but I still can't access the Internet from there. But from living-room computer, I can't access 192.168.1.1 at all as I did before. Maybe FreeBSD stumbled over itself and changed IP addresses? /etc/resolv.conf shows # Generated by resolvconf search cinci.rr.com nameserver 209.18.47.61 nameserver 209.18.47.62 /var/log/messages showed, amid a whole lot of pulseaudio error messages, New router (re0) 74.130.192.1 New IP address (re0) 74.130.196.19 New subnet mask (re0) 255.255.240.0 New Broadcast Address (re0) 255.255.255.255 but I can't log in to router from living-room computer either at 192.168.1.1, 74.130.192.1 or 74.130.196.19 . So FreeBSD might have corrupted something that hopefully would be resolved on reboot. I did reset the router with the pin-through-a-hole, also powered off and a minute later back on, but that didn't resolve anything. from Will Parsons: > Are you sure it's 192.168.1.1? I have a Netgear router, and the > manual falsely claims that that address is the default IP address, but > I'm pretty sure that the real default was 10.0.0.1 (can't be sure for > certain, since I've since changed it). > This may be not relevant to your situation, but I recently had a > problem in that I disabled the option on the router to serve as a DHCP > server (for reasons that I will not go into), and found that I could > no longer reach the router, even via Ethernet. (Solution was to set a > static IP address and default route in /etc/rc.conf.) Did you regain login access to the router? How do you regain login access to the router if you change its IP address and then forget what you changed it to? I guess the pin-through-a-hole reset would get you back. I have some things to do that I don't want to disrupt before rebooting living-room computer. Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 11 11:00:41 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1AB6557 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:00:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from smtp.eutelia.it (mp1-smtp-6.eutelia.it [62.94.10.166]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 566142BCC for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:00:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ns2.biolchim.it (ip-188-188.sn2.eutelia.it [83.211.188.188]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.eutelia.it (Eutelia) with ESMTP id 31308688740 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 12:00:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-240-148.41-151.net24.it [151.41.148.240]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns2.biolchim.it (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rABB0NuQ017045 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 12:00:28 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: ns2.biolchim.it: Host adsl-ull-240-148.41-151.net24.it [151.41.148.240] claimed to be soth.ventu Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rABB0GwH062997 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 12:00:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <5280B8C0.8070206@netfence.it> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 12:00:16 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Half OT] Mavericks' Mail and SSL References: <52718078.8080702@netfence.it> <5272C747.8030805@rsle.net> <5273EF3F.8040307@netfence.it> <5273FD23.7090207@rsle.net> <527554CE.1040605@netfence.it> <527905F3.6020501@rsle.net> <527CB33C.5090804@netfence.it> <527CF75E.8010703@rsle.net> In-Reply-To: <527CF75E.8010703@rsle.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (ns2.biolchim.it [192.168.2.203]); Mon, 11 Nov 2013 12:00:29 +0100 (CET) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:00:41 -0000 On 11/08/13 15:38, R. Scott Evans wrote: > You might have a solution from Apple.... I was greeted with this update > on my Mac today: http://support.apple.com/kb/HT6030 > > It's for compatibility with Gmail, but it might carry over to other mail > systems? Unfortunately, it looks like it didn't... Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 11 13:18:10 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F4A384D for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 13:18:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fluca1978@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-x22a.google.com (mail-we0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 209D0265C for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 13:18:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f170.google.com with SMTP id u57so4647533wes.1 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 05:18:08 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=iOPrOfJ9/1RWBaPvUCYYXxGswmVRVWgDeUjNHPjS2ig=; b=eieOU3adYnpZhDASY+AS/Oar6tu2XqwinIZ1EV9wbpzPpKxmtah7gP8ei4IIFSsoCU nZHdQSXcC6qASrAT/oaLi8l9NYJ8Cp1njkAncHRQv+aUHVJr5PU/NC1d37XNpIjhDYKL tkVYoaOOcR8jjwvrnldOIP4gdlMK67S+p6JhiUrpmmsw09f2ck+VNqnD7SUEB+dUl8AY wmH/I+qEFYJsWqJHhYwE3ihYX/pSVzd+BJMBKx0Z94zXfJ8Wnv0Cf7SQr1XWhBRy47Yh 4fYj9/sjE7H66GgE8lYkVQRYDOU76+S8hxwcaGdqkRq9zvN+yUWzjMZT7SL/aLAvOIsr KmEQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.185.242 with SMTP id ff18mr4367881wic.44.1384175888483; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 05:18:08 -0800 (PST) Sender: fluca1978@gmail.com Received: by 10.194.44.6 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 05:18:08 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:18:08 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: yH-MAXbHi0FuJ3VFKw5tgSq90jY Message-ID: Subject: freebsd-update: fetch or phttpget? From: Luca Ferrari To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 13:18:10 -0000 Hi all, I noted that freebsd-update uses phttpget as main downloader except in a point, where fetch(1) is used: fetch ${QUIETFLAG} http://${SERVERNAME}/${FETCHDIR}/latest.ssl Now, this causes problems with the authentication when behind a proxy, since phttpget and fetch seem to use a different approach to username/password authentication. In particular fetch handles an http_proxy variable that includes username/password, while phttpget does not. What is the rationale behind the usage of two downloader within the same script? Thanks, Luca From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 11 14:17:41 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9E34606 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:17:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-we0-x22c.google.com (mail-we0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 85CD82A37 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:17:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id q58so4650276wes.31 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 06:17:40 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=apGnmsBGKc9YdhzeiVS4IykAQH91nF7FLi3VAbUbd5M=; b=fUEhWIyoLBuX8/aQXRcvLP4ZhxNDQqnEpdZfms/G0oigLhNJ5txcMgH6N6Qm4bUGYo UFc9KL7XedTejxAx8eTf+0aifzN7Auwp+0X9oVKIZYngzlLSSr5IeSjbEwtT/zz9DNAd e1SsRKAyRxzwf659Ct95R2VWsLYuVaHFq4PYv7E+kGeGhiiTjuvi0yomyV6Wv0v9nUCw x0IN/zhqYIyNINhdzHiXJTUiz2A306yY2pAyqVc+EDLRH8UZeSfuq40VGPZhmnyOULll 19LEjVzp+gGzq5ZqvNZ3xZTjIaiQQ3jN2YIVyBHOzByT2fwv9fWBlvyCUR04+WVVihOS D6UA== X-Received: by 10.180.83.228 with SMTP id t4mr12448056wiy.12.1384179459933; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 06:17:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk. [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ma3sm34633030wic.1.2013.11.11.06.17.38 for (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 11 Nov 2013 06:17:39 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:17:37 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: freebsd-update: fetch or phttpget? Message-ID: <20131111141737.05813fed@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:17:42 -0000 On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 14:18:08 +0100 Luca Ferrari wrote: > Hi all, > I noted that freebsd-update uses phttpget as main downloader except in > a point, where fetch(1) is used: > > fetch ${QUIETFLAG} http://${SERVERNAME}/${FETCHDIR}/latest.ssl > > Now, this causes problems with the authentication when behind a > proxy, since phttpget and fetch seem to use a different approach to > username/password authentication. In particular fetch handles an > http_proxy variable that includes username/password, while phttpget > does not. > What is the rationale behind the usage of two downloader within the > same script? phttpget is very basic, but does support http pipelining, so it's much faster downloading a lot of small files - in the script phttpget is always used with xargs. fetch is used for individual files, it has more features and better error reporting. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 11 15:00:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C20FDF97 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 15:00:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fluca1978@gmail.com) Received: from mail-we0-x231.google.com (mail-we0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 611442D19 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 15:00:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id t60so1045038wes.8 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 06:59:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=OAB4WDxO/45toXFd1ns3Fgundsoo6lnLq8kA33vVWWo=; b=c08U/Bs+1IP0/9HZjWt+ON3q3Ymw2D1d2J6LJSOPGSCkayCd04lKX8/TMFgNd4McgI ZDYilsFV9nKAVStdWMuWQHDhkyuGH2zQMjCavG+AqydqOjpGuP+q5JW9rPXNqpbda030 2i1WQ403fkYR/nFpcLhx+8htbr4GpKDk2TQggliQkIRdEL1r8oEX/5V/2NCFlQHJsE7v YkRq+HPOA+IYb7qiAQlHii/qnbX3FmXpl7Q0zYh89rRfspzEM9EJ/cu8digb5J8Tjm9Y IxAX9AqMaEMUrhWG1HgszQTmrEBL3shRlspU/K17kDKbh5NIcYpIwNDWv0ztlceiTdyG p3BA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.94.100 with SMTP id db4mr12685324wib.14.1384181999778; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 06:59:59 -0800 (PST) Sender: fluca1978@gmail.com Received: by 10.194.44.6 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 06:59:59 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20131111141737.05813fed@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <20131111141737.05813fed@gumby.homeunix.com> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 15:59:59 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: BWswghADaRnhSYEtAEYItWgx1uU Message-ID: Subject: Re: freebsd-update: fetch or phttpget? From: Luca Ferrari To: RW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 15:00:01 -0000 On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 3:17 PM, RW wrote: > phttpget is very basic, but does support http pipelining, so it's much > faster downloading a lot of small files - in the script phttpget is > always used with xargs. fetch is used for individual files, it has more > features and better error reporting. Thanks for the explaination. Now, since I'm behind a proxy that requires basic authentication, how can I handle the two different programs? fetch accepts something like http_proxy = "http://user:pass@proxy:port" while phttpget seems to me requires: http_proxy = "http://proxy:port" http_proxy_auth = "basic:::user:pass" Thanks, Luca From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 11 16:58:55 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6560A569 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 16:58:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jerry@seibercom.net) Received: from mail-qe0-x234.google.com (mail-qe0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c02::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20DA42662 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 16:58:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qe0-f52.google.com with SMTP id t9so482731qeq.25 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:58:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:thread-index:content-language; bh=WSumnAepf7/GB1oZM9IYxDHtxFQi685SX/2RdcHqZdc=; b=Dpb4kWT15ChnJT6GvZsxk1GAYfwhjjOB3mB/2v9HMa7kQLBgnaNuwtmzl4EZ3GgvIN kNMwsj05iVRi/towC6NGyn903TW7+QRxu7zptQEzbbbDSZYsBICV13vAeC9UrVuY11uH Wo48645yYst9Pj6G4cvRDBGYrkU+pNNc9aoEA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=WSumnAepf7/GB1oZM9IYxDHtxFQi685SX/2RdcHqZdc=; b=Ca0b2Prwz8/it37OSXwG3qqx0SQq5QuFfHkERrNGfr5hBZBwMUXyCVSd/VmtrYE5q3 dTjMxiJUsK5Tx6wGAgI2aOfe2GZYsKinhjPhadYCViN+k1sw2RZeEqDD/SQlEVAEhvHq KUV/Nm+bxJHrebnVFbVdt2hk52X61LlKcINI0xpUKlP9i4gecJV34C2fSrHoYX0fHDCc Wb44Bb/tISkIqp4iysSJvia2+qkLVMLUonIR/+omUnhqkxO+zc0tS7OQPPoV8/e6BU1n Cab4NXwSMzYvAfRd0FSmoIwjtU6bweleUOzwj4kIRN5D5zF0GTIyyQaAAud10s4vvh7a dbpA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmDOSV9imlchTNVHIKCKY/KpuatD8PSWSE/8FkhwxK21swITgtgo4uwOosHKJB8tvK2sYAK X-Received: by 10.224.3.5 with SMTP id 5mr50821394qal.93.1384189134223; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:58:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from boss530 (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n4sm27704604qax.0.2013.11.11.08.58.53 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 11 Nov 2013 08:58:53 -0800 (PST) From: "Gerard Seibert" To: Subject: FreeBSD 10 and missing "make.file" and ntp won't resolve addresses with unbound running Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:58:45 -0500 Message-ID: <007401cedeff$492c9b90$db85d2b0$@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-Index: Ac7e/rgt5HHKG59bT6y+8DHmNz5tpg== Content-Language: en-us X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 16:58:55 -0000 I just did a fresh install of FreeBSD 10 on a clean machine. I have two = immediate questions. 1) Why is there no "make.conf" file in the /etc directory? Has it been = moved or is it no longer supported? 2) I discovered that with "unbound" loaded, ntp cannot resolve an = address. Bu unloading unbound and changing the /etc/resolve.conf it = works correctly. What am I doing wrong with it. --=20 Jerry From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 11 17:08:51 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 714D295A for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 17:08:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34B0C2736 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 17:08:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-117-74.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.117.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BED353CB22 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 18:08:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id rABH8V2u003327 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 18:08:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 18:08:31 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10 and missing "make.file" and ntp won't resolve addresses with unbound running Message-Id: <20131111180831.bf62cb4a.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <007401cedeff$492c9b90$db85d2b0$@seibercom.net> References: <007401cedeff$492c9b90$db85d2b0$@seibercom.net> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 17:08:51 -0000 On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:58:45 -0500, Gerard Seibert wrote: > I just did a fresh install of FreeBSD 10 on a clean machine. > I have two immediate questions. > > 1) Why is there no "make.conf" file in the /etc directory? > Has it been moved or is it no longer supported? If I remember correctly, this file will be created only if needed (e. g. by a program or by the user). There should be a template / example in /usr/share/examples/etc/make.conf. I don't have a v10 system running so I can't check, but this approach has been used in previous FreeBSD versions. Also check "man make.conf" to see if the manual does mention something different (section FILES). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 11 17:29:57 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 261E1DF for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 17:29:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tom@0x544745.com) Received: from mail-oa0-f45.google.com (mail-oa0-f45.google.com [209.85.219.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6CA728C2 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 17:29:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f45.google.com with SMTP id m1so2619632oag.32 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 09:29:50 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=xU1v/1/LClj87DTUEF6YXKX6syWIdcPWmaCLjGta3io=; b=I9umuP4wYVAgNNVq1tLB/oOp2b3kv+bN3OYXHYpgzbtx+zGsGiKhTS2e50ZFpoq/g0 MbGPdgpjYe7tzJ/OGDb+GgAw6QEtmilAOSX1RImL1UICmlKJh1Jly+D/ZvH5MTpD00pA tZRNuyd01imsp7rCdjj10ypIzMEGLTU1ePEHgftYXbNMZC0LhbESETtT0/YV1iMVv0JN sUpK1w9MtBLm0etjFZStOgbNmoW5l7IBQkc6hjcngYB1lygBrWI07zLTRHBZkt4o3skC sKHkWdYrfhxrpBLteYTzZBpqlfhxYWtCY+1PQDPWAa2Sm1ce1k9FRdnpco2wzA502eD9 gQAQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlu7LKYjJ+5K2zplGNIclRRDebUZ5RcJ+a+xjARkv3N3kMFFscCYJRKUozUmll840pvvrSp MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.254.2 with SMTP id ae2mr1262192obd.105.1384190989973; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 09:29:49 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.104.169 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 09:29:49 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 10:29:49 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: FreeBSD 9.2 crash under load From: Tom Everett To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 17:29:57 -0000 I'm experiencing a fairly repeatable crash under load. Most recently the crash under load was during numerous rsync jobs, at the same time as cross-compiling NetBSD in a jail. I have the crash log from dmesg (below). What do people typically do in situations like to, to determine if the problem is due to overheating, bad hardware, a kernel bug, bad RAM, etc? Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > cpuid = 1; apic id = 01 > fault virtual address = 0xc > fault code = supervisor read data, page not present > instruction pointer = 0x20:0xffffffff80b7442d > stack pointer = 0x28:0xffffff846d11a780 > frame pointer = 0x28:0xffffff846d11a7c0 > code segment = base 0x0, limit 0xfffff, type 0x1b > = DPL 0, pres 1, long 1, def32 0, gran 1 > processor eflags = interrupt enabled, resume, IOPL = 0 > current process = 55420 (rsync) > trap number = 12 > panic: page fault > cpuid = 1 > KDB: stack backtrace: > #0 0xffffffff80947986 at kdb_backtrace+0x66 > #1 0xffffffff8090d9ae at panic+0x1ce > #2 0xffffffff80cf20d0 at trap_fatal+0x290 > #3 0xffffffff80cf2431 at trap_pfault+0x211 > #4 0xffffffff80cf29e4 at trap+0x344 > #5 0xffffffff80cdbd13 at calltrap+0x8 > #6 0xffffffff80b7473e at zone_fetch_slab+0x3e > #7 0xffffffff80b75b8d at uma_zalloc_arg+0x31d > #8 0xffffffff80959f84 at selfdalloc+0x64 > #9 0xffffffff8095bf34 at kern_select+0x594 > #10 0xffffffff8095c32d at sys_select+0x5d > #11 0xffffffff80cf187a at amd64_syscall+0x5ea -- A better world shall emerge based on faith and understanding - Douglas MacArthur From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 11 17:40:45 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88A4E46F for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 17:40:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mays@win.net) Received: from filter1.win.net (filter1.win.net [216.24.27.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 03519297D for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 17:40:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nb-201.win.net (nb-201.win.net [216.24.27.201]) by filter1.win.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id rABHdUlA029752 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 12:39:30 -0500 Received: from Gantry (pool245.office.win.net [216.24.33.245]) by nb-201.win.net (Postfix) with SMTP id C7B6E61C08 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 12:39:29 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <3EAEFD49B4104E3D828386C82B35A1EB@Gantry> From: "Joseph Mays" To: Subject: Expand partition after raid array increase. Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 12:39:32 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_02DC_01CEDEDB.12812260" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3538.513 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3538.513 X-Spam-Score: undef - mays@win.net is whitelisted. X-CanIt-Geo: ip=216.24.27.201; country=US; region=KY; city=Louisville; postalcode=40204; latitude=38.2390; longitude=-85.7174; metrocode=529; areacode=502; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=38.2390,-85.7174&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: Outbound:default (inherits from base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 02KMhDuJJ - 692efd848624 - 20131111 X-Antispam-Training-Forget: http://filter.win.net/canit/b.php?i=02KMhDuJJ&m=692efd848624&t=20131111&c=f X-Antispam-Training-Nonspam: http://filter.win.net/canit/b.php?i=02KMhDuJJ&m=692efd848624&t=20131111&c=n X-Antispam-Training-Spam: http://filter.win.net/canit/b.php?i=02KMhDuJJ&m=692efd848624&t=20131111&c=s X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 216.24.27.101 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 17:40:45 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_02DC_01CEDEDB.12812260 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have a freebsd box with an LSI Raid controller in it. It had 4 = 3-terabyte drives configured in an 8TB array. I added a 5th drive and = built that into the array. Of course, the amount of drive space that = shows in operation in FreeBSD did not change, presumably because I need = to resize the partition. I was trying to follow the partition resizing instructions shown here = --- http://www.unibia.com/unibianet/freebsd/resize-your-existing-freebsd-root= -partitionslice-safely-without-re-installing but when I do the =E2=80=9Cgpart show =E2=80=9D I don=E2=80=99t see the = free space. What I do see is a change in the apparent overall size of = the disk and a set of parititions that don=E2=80=99t add up to the new = size of the disk. How should I be going about increasing the size of the partition? ------=_NextPart_000_02DC_01CEDEDB.12812260-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 11 17:41:51 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8494F61F for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 17:41:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from feld@FreeBSD.org) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5932129BE for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 17:41:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.42]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id D89132230B for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 12:41:48 -0500 (EST) Received: from web3 ([10.202.2.213]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 11 Nov 2013 12:41:49 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:subject:date:in-reply-to :references; s=smtpout; bh=4jAkpQhhSuyA6rOjhKmaqoXkJfM=; b=CqMYH vXpIdZsoA/xZa2gmtcatTExIlaqio0TWQovJ/khr2nTw0rDS30gb17eT4cOTqBWK jglkQYGpX3vHe6kV9hr32NWQUkE3/52M9JwgGiJh2FG25m5H0jswrzGRyDFNuEqw YDvmeaJMOpQVL0sty0SMUj1EvX6MGybPzDqH8I= Received: by web3.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix, from userid 99) id E63FD1101A5; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 12:41:47 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1384191707.2967.45983389.2AA17119@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-Sasl-Enc: JqAmtLcLAYCLZbnjnr8pv8pXf3bJLY94TC8iVHupwX79 1384191707 From: Mark Felder To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-d4893488 Subject: Re: Expand partition after raid array increase. Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:41:47 -0600 In-Reply-To: <3EAEFD49B4104E3D828386C82B35A1EB@Gantry> References: <3EAEFD49B4104E3D828386C82B35A1EB@Gantry> X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 17:41:51 -0000 On Mon, Nov 11, 2013, at 11:39, Joseph Mays wrote: > I have a freebsd box with an LSI Raid controller in it. It had 4 > 3-terabyte drives configured in an 8TB array. I added a 5th drive and > built that into the array. Of course, the amount of drive space that > shows in operation in FreeBSD did not change, presumably because I need > to resize the partition. >=20 > I was trying to follow the partition resizing instructions shown here --- >=20 > http://www.unibia.com/unibianet/freebsd/resize-your-existing-freebsd-root= -partitionslice-safely-without-re-installing >=20 > but when I do the =E2=80=9Cgpart show =E2=80=9D I don=E2=80=99t see the f= ree space. What I do see > is a change in the apparent overall size of the disk and a set of > parititions that don=E2=80=99t add up to the new size of the disk. >=20 > How should I be going about increasing the size of the partition? > Can you provide the output of your "gpart show" so we can see what your current scheme looks like? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 11 20:09:18 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A220AAB for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 20:09:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mays@win.net) Received: from filter2.win.net (filter2.win.net [216.24.27.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B8BF2350 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 20:09:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nb-201.win.net (nb-201.win.net [216.24.27.201]) by filter2.win.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id rABK0iBY016170 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 15:00:44 -0500 Received: from Gantry (pool245.office.win.net [216.24.33.245]) by nb-201.win.net (Postfix) with SMTP id 40F5061C08 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 15:00:44 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: From: "Joseph Mays" To: Subject: Expand partition size after a raid array increase Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 15:00:47 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0415_01CEDEEE.CDB83FB0" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3538.513 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3538.513 X-Spam-Score: undef - mays@win.net is whitelisted. X-CanIt-Geo: ip=216.24.27.201; country=US; region=KY; city=Louisville; postalcode=40204; latitude=38.2390; longitude=-85.7174; metrocode=529; areacode=502; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=38.2390,-85.7174&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: Outbound:default (inherits from base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 01KMk0IWa - 1806d279b6c3 - 20131111 X-Antispam-Training-Forget: http://filter.win.net/canit/b.php?i=01KMk0IWa&m=1806d279b6c3&t=20131111&c=f X-Antispam-Training-Nonspam: http://filter.win.net/canit/b.php?i=01KMk0IWa&m=1806d279b6c3&t=20131111&c=n X-Antispam-Training-Spam: http://filter.win.net/canit/b.php?i=01KMk0IWa&m=1806d279b6c3&t=20131111&c=s X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 216.24.27.102 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 20:09:18 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0415_01CEDEEE.CDB83FB0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I have a freebsd box with an LSI Raid controller in it. It had 4 = 3-terabyte drives configured in an 8TB array. I added a 5th drive and = built that into the array. Of course, the amount of drive space that = shows in operation in FreeBSD did not change, presumably because I need = to resize the partition. I was trying to follow the partition resizing instructions shown here = --- http://www.unibia.com/unibianet/freebsd/resize-your-existing-freebsd-root= -partitionslice-safely-without-re-installing but when I do the =E2=80=9Cgpart show =E2=80=9D I don=E2=80=99t see the = free space. What I do see is a change in the apparent overall size of = the disk and a set of parititions that don=E2=80=99t add up to the new = size of the disk. How should I be going about increasing the size of the partition? ------=_NextPart_000_0415_01CEDEEE.CDB83FB0-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 11 20:35:55 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C339C43 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 20:35:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mohacsi@niif.hu) Received: from strudel.ki.iif.hu (strudel.ki.iif.hu [IPv6:2001:738:0:411:20f:1fff:fe6e:ec1e]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A9D3252A for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 20:35:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bolha.lvs.iif.hu (bolha.lvs.iif.hu [193.225.14.181]) by strudel.ki.iif.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id B563E505 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 21:35:53 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at bolha.lvs.iif.hu Received: from strudel.ki.iif.hu ([IPv6:::ffff:193.6.222.244]) by bolha.lvs.iif.hu (bolha.lvs.iif.hu [::ffff:193.225.14.72]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zZsYvVZ2bNyB for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 21:35:42 +0100 (CET) Received: from norfolk.lan (unknown [193.6.30.29]) by strudel.ki.iif.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5141E4E5 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 21:35:42 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <52813F9D.5090802@niif.hu> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 21:35:41 +0100 From: Janos Mohacsi User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: using freebsd-update to revert back to GENERIC config files? X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 20:35:55 -0000 Dear All, I use freebsd-update to update several FreeBSD instances. Is there a quick method to revert back to GENERIC config files is /etc/ and its sub-directories? I modified locally some files in /etc/mail a while ago, but I don't need those local modification anymore. I tried to copy over the GENERIC configs of /etc/mail files but "freebsd-update fetch" reproting something similar: " Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found. Fetching metadata signature for 9.1-RELEASE from update2.freebsd.org... done. Fetching metadata index... done. Inspecting system... done. Preparing to download files... done. The following files are affected by updates, but no changes have been downloaded because the files have been modified locally: /etc/mail/freebsd.cf /etc/mail/freebsd.submit.cf /etc/mail/sendmail.cf /etc/mail/submit.cf /var/db/mergemaster.mtree " Is there a clean way to overvwrite these files with the GENERIC during 9.2-RELEASE upgrade? Any hints might help. Regards, Janos Mohacsi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 11 21:03:52 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 553D4BF0 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 21:03:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19619278B for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 21:03:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-117-74.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.117.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B04373CA63; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 22:03:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id rABL3cCb004097; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 22:03:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 22:03:38 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Janos Mohacsi Subject: Re: using freebsd-update to revert back to GENERIC config files? Message-Id: <20131111220338.ed645ada.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <52813F9D.5090802@niif.hu> References: <52813F9D.5090802@niif.hu> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 21:03:52 -0000 On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 21:35:41 +0100, Janos Mohacsi wrote: > Is there a clean way to overvwrite these files with the GENERIC during > 9.2-RELEASE upgrade? Don't confuse GENERIC (the name of the configuration file for the kernel distributed with FreeBSD releases) with the stock configuration files. There is no direct relationship. You could try to copy the (unmodified, stock) configuration files if you have used freebsd-update to get the "src" distribution, i. e. the /usr/src tree. Here you will find the /usr/src/etc directory from which you could "make install", and there's also the /usr/src/etc/mail subdirectory with the configuration files that would go to /etc/mail - you can try to copy them manually. Of course, it's "cleaner" to use mergemaster to deal with modified configuration files, such as it is being done around a "make installworld" run, but as you said you're using the binary update method, the system should forgive my suggestion of the unholy blasphemy that arises from manually copying files. :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 12 01:30:27 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E29AE7 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 01:30:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF6D62F78 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2013 23:32:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vg0xe-0006n0-U7 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 00:32:02 +0100 Received: from 65.75.36.70 ([65.75.36.70]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 00:32:02 +0100 Received: from gyliamos by 65.75.36.70 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 00:32:02 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Will Parsons Subject: Re: Problem with wireless router inaccessibility Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 23:31:39 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 36 Message-ID: References: <78.D4.19454.7704F725@cdptpa-oedge03> <527FEAF9.70300@onetel.com> <6A.C3.19454.0D9A0825@cdptpa-oedge03> X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.75.36.70 User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list Reply-To: gyliamos@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 01:30:27 -0000 Thomas Mueller wrote: > from Will Parsons: > >> Are you sure it's 192.168.1.1? I have a Netgear router, and the >> manual falsely claims that that address is the default IP address, but >> I'm pretty sure that the real default was 10.0.0.1 (can't be sure for >> certain, since I've since changed it). > >> This may be not relevant to your situation, but I recently had a >> problem in that I disabled the option on the router to serve as a DHCP >> server (for reasons that I will not go into), and found that I could >> no longer reach the router, even via Ethernet. (Solution was to set a >> static IP address and default route in /etc/rc.conf.) > > Did you regain login access to the router? As I said, I temporarily set a static IP address in /etc/rc.conf: defaultrouter="10.0.1.1" ifconfig_re0="10.0.1.7 netmask 255.255.255.0" But, if I understand you, you can reach the router (e.g., via ping), but if you attempt to go to http://192.168.1.1 (or whatever), you don't get a login screen? > How do you regain login access to the router if you change its IP > address and then forget what you changed it to? > > I guess the pin-through-a-hole reset would get you back. If you've forgotten what IP address you assigned it, resetting to factory defaults is the logical solution. (Might be a good idea to keep a log book in the future when you make configuration changes.) -- Will From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 12 08:14:12 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D35A34D for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 08:14:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail234-107.sinamail.sina.com.cn (mail234-107.sinamail.sina.com.cn [58.63.234.107]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B68C72817 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 08:14:03 +0000 (UTC) X-Originating-IP: [183.23.160.71] Received: from unknown (HELO webmail.sinamail.sina.com.cn) ([10.71.1.43]) by irgz1-219.sinamail.sina.com.cn with ESMTP; 12 Nov 2013 16:14:02 +0800 Received: by webmail.sinamail.sina.com.cn (Postfix, from userid 80) id 6315A260002; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 16:14:15 +0800 (CST) Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 16:14:15 +0800 Received: from guanhengtoy@sina.cn([183.23.160.71]) by m1.mail.sina.com.cn via HTTP; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 16:14:15 +0800 (CST) From: To: "questions" Subject: Letter of introduction MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MessageID: 1384244055.1858.19540 X-Mailer: Sina WebMail 4.0 Message-Id: <20131112081415.6315A260002@webmail.sinamail.sina.com.cn> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GBK Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.16 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list Reply-To: guanhengtoy@sina.cn List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 08:14:12 -0000 IA0KDQoKDQoNCg0KCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KIA0KDQoNCg0KDQoN Cg0KDQoNCg0KDQoKDQoNClRvOiANCkltcG9ydGVyDQogDQpBdHRuOiANClRoZSBNYW5hZ2VyDQog DQpXZSBhcmUgcGxlYXNlZCB0byBpbnRyb2R1Y2Ugb3VyIGNvbXBhbnkgDQphcyBvbmUgb2YgdGhl IG1vc3QgZWZmaWNpZW50IGFuZCBxdWFsaXR5LW9yaWVudGVkIEhhcmR3YXJlIHByb2R1Y3QgDQpt YW51ZmFjdHVyZXJzIGluIENoaW5hLiBXZSBhcmUgZGV2b3RlZCB0byB0aGUgbWFudWZhY3R1cmlu ZyBhbmQgZXhwb3J0aW5nIG9mIHRoZSANCmZvbGxvd2luZyBwcm9kdWN0czogCgoxKSBGYXN0ZW5l cnM6IGNoaXBib2FyZCBzY3Jld3MsIG1hY2hpbmUgc2NyZXdzLCANCmZ1cm5pdHVyZSBzY3Jld3Ms IHRhcHBpbmcgc2NyZXdzLCBibGluZCByaXZldHMsIGFuZCBhbGwga2luZHMgb2YgbmFpbHMuIA0K CgoyKSBBbGwga2luZHMgb2YgaGFyZHdhcmUgZm9yIGRvb3JzIGFuZCB3aW5kb3dzOiBhbGwga2lu ZHMgb2YgbW9ydGlzZSANCmxvY2tzLCBjeWxpbmRlcnMsIGxvY2sgYm9kaWVzLCBoYW5kbGVzLCBm dXJuaXR1cmUgYW5kIGRlY29yYXRpbmcgaGFyZHdhcmUuIA0KCgozKSBBbGwga2luZHMgb2Ygd2ly ZSBwcm9kdWN0czogaGV4YWdvbiB3aXJlIG5ldHRpbmcsIHdlbGRpbmcgd2lyZSANCm5ldHRpbmcs IGFuZCBpcm9uIHdpbmRvdyBzY3JlZW4uIA0KIA0KNCkgQWxsIGtpbmRzIG9mIHNwcmluZzpzcHJl YWQgDQpzcHJpbmcsZnJ1c3R1bSBzY3JvbGwgc3ByaW5nLGNvbHVtbiBzcHJpbmcscmVkdWNpbmcg YW5kIHZhcnlpbmcgc2VjdGlvbiANCnNwcmluZyxhaXIgdmFsdmUgc3ByaW5nLHN0ZWVsIHNoZWV0 IHNwcmluZyxqdW1wIHJpbmdzICAgDQpzcHJpbmcsZGVjb3JhdGl2ZSBzcHJpbmcsdGVuc2lvbiBz cHJpbmcsdG9yc2lvbiBzcHJpbmcsbW91bGQgDQpzcHJpbmcuDQogDQo1KSBBbGwga2luZHMgb2Yg bWV0YWwgc3RhbXBpbmc6IGNvbXB1dGVyIA0KdHJ1bmssY2FycmlhZ2UuDQogDQo2KSBBbGwga2lu ZHMgb2Ygd2FzaGVyOiBmbGF0IA0Kd2FzaGVyLHNwcmluZyB3YXNoZXIuDQogDQo3KSBBbGwga2lu ZHMgb2YgY2FzdGluZyBhbmQgDQp0b29scy4NCiANCjijqUFsbCBraW5kcyBvZiBCdWlsZGluZyBN YXRlcmlhbHMgDQouDQoKCkluIGFkZGl0aW9uLCB3aXRoIHRoZSBtb3N0IA0KYWR2YW5jZWQgQ05D IG1hY2hpbmVyeSwgb3VyIGZhY3RvcnkgY2FuIHByb2R1Y2UgYWxsIGtpbmRzIG9mIHNwZWNpYWwg aGFyZHdhcmUgDQpwYXJ0cyBhY2NvcmRpbmcgdG8gY3VzdG9tZXIncyByZXF1ZXN0LiAKCk93aW5n IHRvIG91ciBsb25nLXRlcm0gZnJpZW5kbHkgDQpyZWxhdGlvbnNoaXBzIHdpdGggb3VyIGpvaW50 IGZhY3Rvcmllcywgd2UgY2FuIG9mZmVyIHlvdSB2ZXJ5IGNvbXBldGl0aXZlIA0KcHJpY2VzLCBn b29kIHF1YWxpdHkgYW5kIHBlcmZlY3Qgc2VydmljZSEgT3VyIHByb2R1Y3RzIGFyZSBzZWxsaW5n IHdlbGwgaW4gDQpFdXJvcGUgYW5kIEFtZXJpY2Esc3BlY2lhbGx5IGEgc2VyaWVzIG9mIGZpcmUg ZXh0aW5ndWlzaGVyIG9mIGJyYWNrZXQgaGF2ZSBtYWRlIA0KZm9yIGZpcmUgcHJvdGVjdGlvbiBh dXRob3JpdHkgb2YgVVNBCgpXZSBzaW5jZXJlbHkgaG9wZSB0byBlc3RhYmxpc2ggDQpsb25nIHRl cm0gYnVzaW5lc3MgcmVsYXRpb25zaGlwIHdpdGggYWxsIGN1c3RvbWVycyBpbiB0aGUgd29ybGQu IElmIHlvdSBuZWVkIA0KbW9yZSBpbmZvcm1hdGlvbiBmcm9tIHVzLCBwbGVhc2UgZG8gbm90IGhl c2l0YXRlIHRvIGNvbnRhY3QgdXMuIFdlJ2xsIHRyeSBvdXIgDQpiZXN0IHRvIGNvb3BlcmF0ZSB3 aXRoIHlvdSBhbmQgb2ZmZXIgeW91IHBlcmZlY3Qgc2VydmljZS4gDQogDQpUaGFua3MgeW91IGZv ciB5b3VyIGF0dGVudGlvbiB0byB0aGlzIA0KaW50cm9kdWN0b3J5IGxldHRlciBhbmQgbG9va2lu ZyBmb3J3YXJkIHRvIGhlYXJpbmcgZnJvbSB5b3Ugc29vbi4NCiANCg0KDQogDQoNCg0KDQogDQog DQpCZXN0IHJlZ2FyZHMsDQogDQogDQogDQogUGFuZyANCkNoZW5nDQpNYW5hZ2luZyANCmRpcmVj dG9yDQoKIA0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCkNvbnRhY3QgaW5mb3JtYXRpb24NCi0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0NCiANCkNvbXBhbnkgTmFtZTogR1VBTkhFTkcgIENPLiwgTFREDQogDQoNCg0KSW4gRG9uZ2d1 YW4sIENoaW5hDQoNCg0KLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tDQoNClJvb20gQTUxMixIb25neGkg Q2VudGVyLE5vLjIgVGl5dSANClJvYWQsDQpOYW5jaGVuZyBEaXN0cmljdCwNCkRvbmdndWFuIENp dHksDQpHdWFuZ2RvbmcgUHJvdmluY2UsDQpDaGluYQ0KIA0KVGVsIC8gRmF4IDogODYtNzY5LTIy NDAzMTMwDQpFLW1haWw6aW5mb0BnaGFjbC5jb20gIA0KICAgICAgIA0KDQogICAgICAgIA0KDQoK IA0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0K DQoNCg0KDQo= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 12 08:16:40 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 454B747D for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 08:16:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail19-222.sinamail.sina.com.cn (mail19-222.sinamail.sina.com.cn [121.14.19.222]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F04B72845 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 08:16:36 +0000 (UTC) X-Originating-IP: [183.23.160.71] Received: from unknown (HELO webmail.sinamail.sina.com.cn) ([10.71.1.43]) by irgz1-217.sinamail.sina.com.cn with ESMTP; 12 Nov 2013 16:12:26 +0800 Received: by webmail.sinamail.sina.com.cn (Postfix, from userid 80) id D22A5260001; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 16:12:38 +0800 (CST) Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 16:12:38 +0800 Received: from guanhengtoy@sina.cn([183.23.160.71]) by m1.mail.sina.com.cn via HTTP; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 16:12:38 +0800 (CST) From: To: "freebsd-questions" Subject: Letter of introduction MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MessageID: 1384243958.2771.22890 X-Mailer: Sina WebMail 4.0 Message-Id: <20131112081238.D22A5260001@webmail.sinamail.sina.com.cn> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=GBK Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.16 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list Reply-To: guanhengtoy@sina.cn List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 08:16:40 -0000 Cg0KDQoKDQoNCg0KDQoNCiANCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KCg0KDQpUbzogDQpJbXBvcnRl cg0KIA0KQXR0bjogDQpUaGUgTWFuYWdlcg0KIA0KV2UgYXJlIHBsZWFzZWQgdG8gaW50cm9kdWNl IG91ciBjb21wYW55IA0KYXMgb25lIG9mIHRoZSBtb3N0IGVmZmljaWVudCBhbmQgcXVhbGl0eS1v cmllbnRlZCBIYXJkd2FyZSBwcm9kdWN0IA0KbWFudWZhY3R1cmVycyBpbiBDaGluYS4gV2UgYXJl IGRldm90ZWQgdG8gdGhlIG1hbnVmYWN0dXJpbmcgYW5kIGV4cG9ydGluZyBvZiB0aGUgDQpmb2xs b3dpbmcgcHJvZHVjdHM6IAoKMSkgRmFzdGVuZXJzOiBjaGlwYm9hcmQgc2NyZXdzLCBtYWNoaW5l IHNjcmV3cywgDQpmdXJuaXR1cmUgc2NyZXdzLCB0YXBwaW5nIHNjcmV3cywgYmxpbmQgcml2ZXRz LCBhbmQgYWxsIGtpbmRzIG9mIG5haWxzLiANCgoKMikgQWxsIGtpbmRzIG9mIGhhcmR3YXJlIGZv ciBkb29ycyBhbmQgd2luZG93czogYWxsIGtpbmRzIG9mIG1vcnRpc2UgDQpsb2NrcywgY3lsaW5k ZXJzLCBsb2NrIGJvZGllcywgaGFuZGxlcywgZnVybml0dXJlIGFuZCBkZWNvcmF0aW5nIGhhcmR3 YXJlLiANCgoKMykgQWxsIGtpbmRzIG9mIHdpcmUgcHJvZHVjdHM6IGhleGFnb24gd2lyZSBuZXR0 aW5nLCB3ZWxkaW5nIHdpcmUgDQpuZXR0aW5nLCBhbmQgaXJvbiB3aW5kb3cgc2NyZWVuLiANCiAN CjQpIEFsbCBraW5kcyBvZiBzcHJpbmc6c3ByZWFkIA0Kc3ByaW5nLGZydXN0dW0gc2Nyb2xsIHNw cmluZyxjb2x1bW4gc3ByaW5nLHJlZHVjaW5nIGFuZCB2YXJ5aW5nIHNlY3Rpb24gDQpzcHJpbmcs YWlyIHZhbHZlIHNwcmluZyxzdGVlbCBzaGVldCBzcHJpbmcsanVtcCByaW5ncyAgIA0Kc3ByaW5n LGRlY29yYXRpdmUgc3ByaW5nLHRlbnNpb24gc3ByaW5nLHRvcnNpb24gc3ByaW5nLG1vdWxkIA0K c3ByaW5nLg0KIA0KNSkgQWxsIGtpbmRzIG9mIG1ldGFsIHN0YW1waW5nOiBjb21wdXRlciANCnRy dW5rLGNhcnJpYWdlLg0KIA0KNikgQWxsIGtpbmRzIG9mIHdhc2hlcjogZmxhdCANCndhc2hlcixz cHJpbmcgd2FzaGVyLg0KIA0KNykgQWxsIGtpbmRzIG9mIGNhc3RpbmcgYW5kIA0KdG9vbHMuDQog DQo4o6lBbGwga2luZHMgb2YgQnVpbGRpbmcgTWF0ZXJpYWxzIA0KLg0KCgpJbiBhZGRpdGlvbiwg d2l0aCB0aGUgbW9zdCANCmFkdmFuY2VkIENOQyBtYWNoaW5lcnksIG91ciBmYWN0b3J5IGNhbiBw cm9kdWNlIGFsbCBraW5kcyBvZiBzcGVjaWFsIGhhcmR3YXJlIA0KcGFydHMgYWNjb3JkaW5nIHRv IGN1c3RvbWVyJ3MgcmVxdWVzdC4gCgpPd2luZyB0byBvdXIgbG9uZy10ZXJtIGZyaWVuZGx5IA0K cmVsYXRpb25zaGlwcyB3aXRoIG91ciBqb2ludCBmYWN0b3JpZXMsIHdlIGNhbiBvZmZlciB5b3Ug dmVyeSBjb21wZXRpdGl2ZSANCnByaWNlcywgZ29vZCBxdWFsaXR5IGFuZCBwZXJmZWN0IHNlcnZp Y2UhIE91ciBwcm9kdWN0cyBhcmUgc2VsbGluZyB3ZWxsIGluIA0KRXVyb3BlIGFuZCBBbWVyaWNh LHNwZWNpYWxseSBhIHNlcmllcyBvZiBmaXJlIGV4dGluZ3Vpc2hlciBvZiBicmFja2V0IGhhdmUg bWFkZSANCmZvciBmaXJlIHByb3RlY3Rpb24gYXV0aG9yaXR5IG9mIFVTQQoKV2Ugc2luY2VyZWx5 IGhvcGUgdG8gZXN0YWJsaXNoIA0KbG9uZyB0ZXJtIGJ1c2luZXNzIHJlbGF0aW9uc2hpcCB3aXRo IGFsbCBjdXN0b21lcnMgaW4gdGhlIHdvcmxkLiBJZiB5b3UgbmVlZCANCm1vcmUgaW5mb3JtYXRp b24gZnJvbSB1cywgcGxlYXNlIGRvIG5vdCBoZXNpdGF0ZSB0byBjb250YWN0IHVzLiBXZSdsbCB0 cnkgb3VyIA0KYmVzdCB0byBjb29wZXJhdGUgd2l0aCB5b3UgYW5kIG9mZmVyIHlvdSBwZXJmZWN0 IHNlcnZpY2UuIA0KIA0KVGhhbmtzIHlvdSBmb3IgeW91ciBhdHRlbnRpb24gdG8gdGhpcyANCmlu dHJvZHVjdG9yeSBsZXR0ZXIgYW5kIGxvb2tpbmcgZm9yd2FyZCB0byBoZWFyaW5nIGZyb20geW91 IHNvb24uDQogDQoNCg0KIA0KDQoNCg0KIA0KIA0KQmVzdCByZWdhcmRzLA0KIA0KIA0KIA0KIFBh bmcgDQpDaGVuZw0KTWFuYWdpbmcgDQpkaXJlY3Rvcg0KCiANCg0KDQoNCg0KDQpDb250YWN0IGlu Zm9ybWF0aW9uDQotLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tDQogDQpDb21wYW55IE5hbWU6IEdVQU5IRU5H ICBDTy4sIExURA0KIA0KDQoNCkluIERvbmdndWFuLCBDaGluYQ0KDQoNCi0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLQ0KDQpSb29tIEE1MTIsSG9uZ3hpIENlbnRlcixOby4yIFRpeXUgDQpSb2FkLA0KTmFu Y2hlbmcgRGlzdHJpY3QsDQpEb25nZ3VhbiBDaXR5LA0KR3Vhbmdkb25nIFByb3ZpbmNlLA0KQ2hp bmENCiANClRlbCAvIEZheCA6IDg2LTc2OS0yMjQwMzEzMA0KRS1tYWlsOmluZm9AZ2hhY2wuY29t ICANCiAgICAgICANCg0KICAgICAgICANCg0KCiANCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0KDQoNCg0K DQoNCg0KDQoNCg== From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 12 09:55:38 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC161619 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 09:55:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.166.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88C712E53 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 09:55:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [74.130.196.19] ([74.130.196.19:64543] helo=localhost) by cdptpa-oedge02 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.5.0.35861 r(Momo-dev:tip)) with ESMTP id 9D/CE-27821-81BF1825; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 09:55:37 +0000 Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 09:55:36 +0000 Message-ID: <9D.CE.27821.81BF1825@cdptpa-oedge02> From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org References: <78.D4.19454.7704F725@cdptpa-oedge03> <527FEAF9.70300@onetel.com> Subject: Re: Problem with wireless router inaccessibility X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.130:25 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 09:55:38 -0000 from Warren Block and my original post: > > I can still access the Internet and browse from FreeBSD on living-room computer, but can't log in to the router. > > I'm afraid to reboot for fear that I could never regain Internet access. > At worst, replacing the router should fix it. > > It's possible that rebooting could resolve the problem, but there is the risk of not being able to get back in. > > I don't know if the wireless router is going bad, or if its IP address (192.168.1.1) has changed. > It can't be that, because one computer can still use it as a gateway > to get to the net. > > I could order a new router online while I still have Internet access. > > Now I'm trying to decide whether the router is going bad or if FreeBSD stumbled on itself. > Run ifconfig on the working computer to see the IP address it was > assigned by DHCP, and compare that to the not-working systems. > Consumer-grade routers frequently have poor firmware and need > relatively frequent resets. Some also have poor power supplies that > are prone to failure. Replacing the firmware with DD-WRT or Tomato > makes for a much more reliable unit. Power supply testing can be done > by swapping with another unit. > My experience with the Netgear consumer wireless routers has not been > great. If you can find one, the good old WRT54G is still an excellent > unit. These are often available at thrift stores and yard sales. I forgot to ask on last response, where do you find DD-WRT or Tomato firmware, and how do you apply it? Wireless router web interface has a link to check for firmware updates, but that would go to Netgear site. Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 12 09:59:47 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95BB590C for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 09:59:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vfemail.net (nine.vfemail.net [108.76.175.9]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 08F1B2E95 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 09:59:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 361 invoked by uid 89); 12 Nov 2013 09:59:45 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO freequeue.vfemail.net) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 12 Nov 2013 09:59:45 -0000 Received: (qmail 202 invoked by uid 89); 12 Nov 2013 09:59:28 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.3.1 ppid: 200, pid: 201, t: 0.0101s scanners:none Received: from unknown (HELO smtp101-2.vfemail.net) (172.16.100.61) by FreeQueue with SMTP; 12 Nov 2013 09:59:28 -0000 Received-SPF: softfail (FreeQueue: transitioning SPF record at vfemail.net does not designate 172.16.100.61 as permitted sender) Received: (qmail 16628 invoked by uid 89); 12 Nov 2013 09:59:28 -0000 Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 16613, pid: 16620, t: 0.6687s scanners:none Received: from unknown (HELO mytinymart.info) (cnhuZ29kMUB2ZmVtYWlsLm5ldA==@62.219.232.60) by 172.16.100.61 with ESMTPA; 12 Nov 2013 09:59:27 -0000 Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 11:59:25 +0200 To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org From: RxPillsMd Newsletter Subject: RxPillsMd chip offers! Message-ID: <4e3e3e25f2faf13d0c9d5d172a99860f@localhost.localdomain> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook, Build 11.0.5510 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 Precedence: bulk X-ListMember: Array X-Sender: rxngod1@vfemail.net Errors-To: rxngod1@vfemail.net X-AntiAbuse: This is a solicited email for - localhost.localdomain mailing list. X-AntiAbuse: Servername - localhost.localdomain X-AntiAbuse: rxngod1@vfemail.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset = "iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.16 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Reply-To: Newsletter List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 09:59:47 -0000 If you cannot see this newsletter, please click the link below: http://this2all.com/products/rxpillsmd/ ------------------------------------------------- VFEmail.net - http://www.vfemail.net $24.95 ONETIME Lifetime accounts with Privacy Features! 15GB disk! No bandwidth quotas! Commercial and Bulk Mail Options! From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 12 10:05:51 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63EB3D97 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 10:05:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x22e.google.com (mail-wg0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 024312F2F for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 10:05:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f46.google.com with SMTP id x12so1320050wgg.25 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 02:05:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=sQNl+GoY5IyP4KyT+PlvwRSLcnUVKZXtmF1QDBDw+FQ=; b=uUNi7y+hP0oslWJ/5enLhLAYC3EGYu01QztBraG4vn38nPMW8rG5eTKi1AxRjFw+T8 fjhMcSn6Ap8ZJb4jkXLYp2Zi9OAZ10Q2IzSG6b7hg8JbljPkI4tV+oNu+JM6GHc7PwVc t1AiqlYLme/piAADx5/flmt5OX3NVgryeAqr8KxClzoXUpWlP6kwvLJwgC+TE0LcRn1C 7kyUfjvf8ytTzHXb4/3RnfLUqWmSjiVrbXM0zAjODm2y5HR2tGw+9mHN/FIiGelcsb/w Hp2GZX0mumF7McF8x916BFiF+TgiR+32ALwR1vFSwK11Sx44y1qaa0mgC3xzrbMxGjOn bKdg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.20.13 with SMTP id j13mr15460786wie.8.1384250749505; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 02:05:49 -0800 (PST) Sender: olivier2553@gmail.com Received: by 10.217.112.132 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 02:05:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <9D.CE.27821.81BF1825@cdptpa-oedge02> References: <78.D4.19454.7704F725@cdptpa-oedge03> <527FEAF9.70300@onetel.com> <9D.CE.27821.81BF1825@cdptpa-oedge02> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 17:05:49 +0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: eb9iSbstsu-e7zPMqR8ZZ0n9zwk Message-ID: Subject: Re: Problem with wireless router inaccessibility From: Olivier Nicole To: Thomas Mueller Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 10:05:51 -0000 Tom, > I forgot to ask on last response, where do you find DD-WRT or Tomato firmware, and how do you apply it? You could google for it :) dd-wrt.com It is not straight forward to install, you better read the forum for all information that is pertinent to you router, and then read it a second time. But once, you're done, it's a big improvement (and you have shell access to the Linux running on your router). Olivier > > Wireless router web interface has a link to check for firmware updates, but that would go to Netgear site. > > Tom > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 12 10:19:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 792D72B1 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 10:19:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.166.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 459222FE1 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 10:19:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [74.130.196.19] ([74.130.196.19:30895] helo=localhost) by cdptpa-oedge03 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.5.0.35861 r(Momo-dev:tip)) with ESMTP id 84/EC-19454-49002825; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 10:19:00 +0000 Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 10:19:00 +0000 Message-ID: <84.EC.19454.49002825@cdptpa-oedge03> From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org References: <78.D4.19454.7704F725@cdptpa-oedge03> <527FEAF9.70300@onetel.com> <6A.C3.19454.0D9A0825@cdptpa-oedge03> Subject: Re: Problem with wireless router inaccessibility X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.142:25 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 10:19:02 -0000 from Will Parsons and my previous post: > > Did you regain login access to the router? > As I said, I temporarily set a static IP address in /etc/rc.conf: > defaultrouter="10.0.1.1" > ifconfig_re0="10.0.1.7 netmask 255.255.255.0" But would the router respond on 10.0.1.1? Could you do this at command prompt as opposed to /etc/rc.conf? > But, if I understand you, you can reach the router (e.g., via ping), > but if you attempt to go to http://192.168.1.1 (or whatever), you > don't get a login screen? I get a login screen from the bedroom computer using System Rescue CD 3.6.0 and Midori web browser, but not from living-room computer. > > How do you regain login access to the router if you change its IP > > address and then forget what you changed it to? > > > I guess the pin-through-a-hole reset would get you back. > If you've forgotten what IP address you assigned it, resetting to > factory defaults is the logical solution. (Might be a good idea to > keep a log book in the future when you make configuration changes.) A log book or paper is good to keep router login password, IP address if changed, also wireless network name and password or PSK. -- > Will Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 12 11:21:57 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 875F675F for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 11:21:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qe0-x236.google.com (mail-qe0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c02::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 461A123F3 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 11:21:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qe0-f54.google.com with SMTP id 1so5504647qec.13 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 03:21:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:thread-index:content-language; bh=wBENJjBgGt+uGSZehcILnsELAT9rDmbqVodKtrkrTEs=; b=YdrOFQYHExxtenU9CdIlSQnVySr3N51E7N+Ul+qH2FzOXyRQkF8wPCkPm8lJrNxuuF 2UfZ8fZCk1aNZnt3jJn1DXBEgM7CGLYW/zPCEK7o+V88mOT5rNlhgnXQXmc1h9D3KAWB 0iW3rhJDDlESFP9wfbuzrHLIhKS6z3Kw7IVz0= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=wBENJjBgGt+uGSZehcILnsELAT9rDmbqVodKtrkrTEs=; b=lQd01NIQQGAmmyOVPeagAk3JmzRHInRoO7hjkRUZqeIe5gEfC8OsW56fqQwNNGtlCu EpQOuwxVUEv6jY71nUktvA9Yoab5FJ24r8hton4UsUPhaDjWUd+5d5T6QtgSQbLlCHgH rd7kpU4GozC4FFabvwrsHx45/teis5adxflQNjaD87ClOnCnaoAhNO3EJOakvjKutBdK +WEiDeebcyd5xe3VV0gUwkbjjo1p6hVINGE3vj9/3eS/0JrXra3pFmYJdQgH+7+756d+ LxrCZ8MR92FIG8svnF5vgW9xfcyv3ZmJ5c2pEUqpNF84SlPtTalaRwi7ud4vLShBdwTq LWJQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlU7IHEiZxI1zyX8xyNoAEnVoEJ0FD8xkbtXGstAWRxhTYfb/5wkLbl4IgAI/uOmbrhTeSx X-Received: by 10.49.103.161 with SMTP id fx1mr55172492qeb.68.1384255316400; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 03:21:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from boss530 (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id x10sm69379998qas.5.2013.11.12.03.21.55 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 12 Nov 2013 03:21:55 -0800 (PST) From: "Gerard Seibert" To: Subject: unbound and ntp in FreeBSD 10 Beta 3 Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 06:21:43 -0500 Message-ID: <00dc01cedf99$5e1c0cd0$1a542670$@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-Index: Ac7fmPCnAI7lXtvbQMCxGpq5IRQyQg== Content-Language: en-us X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 11:21:57 -0000 I just did a fresh install of FreeBSD 10 Beta 3 on a clean machine. For = whatever reason, I am having the following problem. I added this to the rc.conf file: local_unbound_enable=3D"YES" I also have: ntpd_enable=3D"YES" in the file. This is the resolv.conf file: #Generated by resolvconf #nameserver 209.18.47.61 #nameserver 209.18.47.62 #nameserver 192.168.1.1 nameserver 127.0.0.1 options edns0 Now, with this configuration, ntpd never resolves any of the addresses = it needs to work. My screen fills up with error messages. If I uncomment = the three nameserver entries it works fine until the next reboot. I had = to comment out the unbound line in the rc.conf file to prevent it from = causing the resolv.conf file from being over written I obviously have something configured incorrectly. Can anyone help me = with this? Also, what do the "options" mean? I cannot find any = documentation on it. --=20 Jerry From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 12 11:29:58 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 132A68C6 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 11:29:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz (exchange.mail.starnet.cz [92.62.224.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B2CD2434 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 11:29:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz ([fe80::d017:9e72:12a5:7bb4]) by EXCHANGE.mail.starnet.cz ([fe80::d017:9e72:12a5:7bb4%14]) with mapi; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 12:28:44 +0100 From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Radek_Krej=E8a?= To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 12:28:43 +0100 Subject: Diskless nfs problem Thread-Topic: Diskless nfs problem Thread-Index: Ac7fmldd6C91t95MSMuJx46rLYoWDQ== Message-ID: Accept-Language: cs-CZ Content-Language: cs-CZ X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: cs-CZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 11:29:58 -0000 Hello, I have about 100 diskless freebsd routers and I have problem with huge traf= fic to nfs server. The mostly traffic is generated by requesting file right= s over GETATTR CALL to lib files, eg. ./lib/libc.so.7 Is there any chance to change this behavior? My diskless machines are boote= d over pxe described at http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/network-diskles= s.html . My load of nfs server is (because of this behavior): load averages: 48.33, 47.83, 47.75 and top 1059 root 60 52 0 9912K 1236K RUN 7 ??? 788.96% nfs= d Thank you very much Radek From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 12 13:23:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 347D3A58 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 13:23:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm35-vm3.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm35-vm3.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [72.30.238.75]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A0A022B87 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 13:23:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [66.196.81.173] by nm35.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Nov 2013 13:23:08 -0000 Received: from [98.139.212.217] by tm19.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Nov 2013 13:23:08 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1026.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Nov 2013 13:23:08 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 212649.34756.bm@omp1026.mail.bf1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 33046 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Nov 2013 13:23:08 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1384262588; bh=AtxuniD1OQ2jwVNqhWk4mvRsIjDFrfIzCo9MqCUWsNE=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=cB061ZenWYsM4FujcME+hdGSZBSkjh9NPAg1ei1QBimHch5lO65EKVfDaI/5eAr9t++tg1LQSHgS6GNDQMY5i/u/IlRdcn0O/qXzbXX8lgTNx088PfuLBEiNxj1WIoAeyHvShWFxdMhiCZzQOyuC8Gd5HomJF+N+LGQdTxLP2sw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=bG1Uxnsb8I0nDZp51dxECIrlME81+Fx1MDZ/ZlPAXgPS+ZP+Ozz+KcLyuxFJvEasiVxjfnpeiXV3s+ESJlfwGndjMc2Cbvy9XhH14fFSGuaCYUGGi4NykwLH/oag4n4KC41O5MzlGbKvm+R3bvZwesy1QhWW3tFkDYLkIOCxkjw=; X-YMail-OSG: uYLSfZkVM1kTy2wMglvsDZaN9z_IsNdoO4b483vxKKiu7Rl EIVESedF7.lFhA96cPGYQepT3.NhhvXy1emQX2BHnodDa2GOIz4JrcYwflqg _vwmRXaPyVVAhdhk7jUWvY9vEOD3ykjt6j603kPq5siEfmmK9goh1w2x4vbE tx.aXs5T2fPYIqvupSxi5jQw7i_cYzoLYkt8dvuHILvS_7bcik2M8.K1tgBK 2Qky6UbKbB1u33yI8mXimjwiSYaHibiYeos9PxHY0RuUy7HSRVOIER64blDN GtK5Vh9z.LpnNPGY__uIypORNDaPb7lm_GXgJx2Fb4joho5ehV4UGYzzi2Pl 6tn7.Lq2wzUPAs3nfFjkkGx537i0KmJRal87zgxY1JnPAoJ3iDIozu8UPWP6 nZD6MHoRcLc.K31oSPV0t.1fFDRYu68Zq_AqfIXkdf.WeQYwxrSWGKP_nOcx m_1flnCxIbUcr5UhLHYJN26lsj9465p6f6zEPuz5gd79JvypwtYXfF8s7XFM naAyzqwDnzCtDnq.FWCHD5KVSgNdaVoXo8kHxtM3rUAnmVP4dvhdwn6Erogo yH.XOYE2BBzRJJA-- Received: from [112.134.161.216] by web161905.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 05:23:08 PST X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001, SGkgYWxsCgpNeSBjb21wdXRlciBydW5zIEZyZWVCU0QgOS4xIChpMzg2KSBhbmQgS0RFIGlzIHZlcnNpb24gNC44LjQuCgpDb21wdXRlciBoYW5nZWQsIGhhZCB0byBmb3JjZSBwb3dlciBkb3duIGZyb20gdGhlIHBvd2VyIGJ1dHRvbi4KCkFmdGVyIHRoYXQgRnJlZUJTRCBydW5zIHdlbGwgYnV0IHdoZW4gdHJ5IHRvIHN0YXJ0IEtERSwgaXQgcHJpbnRzIGZvbGxvd2luZyBhbmQgaW1tZWRpYXRlbHkgcmVib290czoKCkdlbmVyYXRpbmcgS0RNIGNvbmZpZ3VyYXRpb24uCnBhbmljOiBCYWQgZWZmbmxpbmsgZmkBMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.163.597 Message-ID: <1384262588.31259.YahooMailNeo@web161905.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 05:23:08 -0800 (PST) From: Unga Subject: KDE4 crashed, how to recover? To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list Reply-To: Unga List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 13:23:11 -0000 Hi all My computer runs FreeBSD 9.1 (i386) and KDE is version 4.8.4. Computer hanged, had to force power down from the power button. After that FreeBSD runs well but when try to start KDE, it prints following and immediately reboots: Generating KDM configuration. panic: Bad effnlink fip 0x..., fdp 0x..., tdp 0x.... cpuid = 2 KDB: stack backtrace: #0 0x... at kdb_backtrace #1 0x... at panic #2 0x... at ufs_rename #3 0x... at VOP_RENAME_APV #4 0x... at kern_renameat #5 0x... at kern_rename #6 0x... at sys_rename #7 0x... at syscall #8 0x... at Xint0x80_syscall How to recover from this issue? Many thanks in advance. Unga From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 12 13:41:24 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24EDD399 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 13:41:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF8B12CDF for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 13:41:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-117-74.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.117.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 625BA27908; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:41:16 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id rACDf4Xd002351; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:41:04 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:41:04 +0100 From: Polytropon To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: KDE4 crashed, how to recover? Message-Id: <20131112144104.a1034dd1.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <1384262588.31259.YahooMailNeo@web161905.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> References: <1384262588.31259.YahooMailNeo@web161905.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Unga X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 13:41:24 -0000 On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 05:23:08 -0800 (PST), Unga wrote: > [...] > Computer hanged, had to force power down from the power button. > > After that FreeBSD runs well but when try to start KDE, it prints > following and immediately reboots: > > Generating KDM configuration. > panic: Bad effnlink fip 0x..., fdp 0x..., tdp 0x.... > cpuid = 2 > KDB: stack backtrace: > #0 0x... at kdb_backtrace > #1 0x... at panic > #2 0x... at ufs_rename > #3 0x... at VOP_RENAME_APV > #4 0x... at kern_renameat > #5 0x... at kern_rename > #6 0x... at sys_rename > #7 0x... at syscall > #8 0x... at Xint0x80_syscall > > How to recover from this issue? Make sure your file systems have been successfully repaired. It's useful to boot into single user mode and perform a fsck of all partitions _prior_ to continuing the boot process. Note that a background fsck could still be running while you try to restart KDE with an underlying inconsistent filesystem. To intendedly avoid booting into a possibly dirty filesystem environment, put background_fsck="NO" into /etc/rc.conf, but note that, depending on the size of your disks, startup time will probably increase dramatically. :-) Still it's hard to imagine how a file system defect could cause that immediate kind of kernel panic... -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 12 14:11:27 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45C32CE6 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:11:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from land.berklix.org (land.berklix.org [144.76.10.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C08E02F1C for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:11:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p5DCBE5B5.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [93.203.229.181]) (authenticated bits=128) by land.berklix.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rACEBM8h070974; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:11:22 GMT (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id rACEBCpX038825; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:11:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost.js.berklix.net [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rACEAss6010648; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:11:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from jhs@fire.js.berklix.net) Message-Id: <201311121411.rACEAss6010648@fire.js.berklix.net> To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" , Unga Subject: Re: KDE4 crashed, how to recover? From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultancy, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:41:04 +0100." <20131112144104.a1034dd1.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:10:54 +0100 Sender: jhs@berklix.com Cc: Polytropon X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:11:27 -0000 Polytropon wrote: > On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 05:23:08 -0800 (PST), Unga wrote: > > [...] > > Computer hanged, had to force power down from the power button. > > > > After that FreeBSD runs well but when try to start KDE, it prints > > following and immediately reboots: > > > > Generating KDM configuration. > > panic: Bad effnlink fip 0x..., fdp 0x..., tdp 0x.... > > cpuid = 2 > > KDB: stack backtrace: > > #0 0x... at kdb_backtrace > > #1 0x... at panic > > #2 0x... at ufs_rename > > #3 0x... at VOP_RENAME_APV > > #4 0x... at kern_renameat > > #5 0x... at kern_rename > > #6 0x... at sys_rename > > #7 0x... at syscall > > #8 0x... at Xint0x80_syscall > > > > How to recover from this issue? > > Make sure your file systems have been successfully repaired. > It's useful to boot into single user mode and perform a fsck > of all partitions _prior_ to continuing the boot process. > Note that a background fsck could still be running while you > try to restart KDE with an underlying inconsistent filesystem. > To intendedly avoid booting into a possibly dirty filesystem > environment, put background_fsck="NO" into /etc/rc.conf, but > note that, depending on the size of your disks, startup time > will probably increase dramatically. :-) > > Still it's hard to imagine how a file system defect could cause > that immediate kind of kernel panic... Agreed, not only will background_fsck="NO" have the useful effect Polytropon writes above, it will also do a more thorough check. To quote man fack: -B Run in background mode .... Note that background fsck is limited to checking for only the most commonly occurring file system abnormalities. Under certain circumstances, some errors can escape background fsck. It is recommended that you perform foreground fsck on your systems periodically and whenever you encounter file-system-related pan- ics. If I get a crash or panic, (unless its obviously dodgy IO, eg overheating, USB etc) I just by reflex give it a full foreground fsck at least of all system bins & lib [& pref. user data too, especially of any potential troublesome data mounts involved]. Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Unix Linux C Sys Eng Consultant, Munich http://berklix.com Interleave replies below like a play script. Indent old text with "> ". Send plain text, not quoted-printable, HTML, base64, or multipart/alternative. Extradite NSA spy chief Alexander. http://berklix.eu/jhs/blog/2013_10_30 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 12 14:13:40 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1F056F6D for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:13:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 689992F46 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:13:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rACEDb7k003409; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 07:13:37 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id rACEDbxj003406; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 07:13:37 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 07:13:37 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Thomas Mueller Subject: Re: Problem with wireless router inaccessibility In-Reply-To: <9D.CE.27821.81BF1825@cdptpa-oedge02> Message-ID: References: <78.D4.19454.7704F725@cdptpa-oedge03> <527FEAF9.70300@onetel.com> <9D.CE.27821.81BF1825@cdptpa-oedge02> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Tue, 12 Nov 2013 07:13:37 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:13:40 -0000 On Tue, 12 Nov 2013, Thomas Mueller wrote: > I forgot to ask on last response, where do you find DD-WRT or Tomato firmware, and how do you apply it? http://www.dd-wrt.com/site/index http://www.polarcloud.com/tomato Not all routers are compatible, so both have lists of supported units along with installation instructions. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 12 14:31:45 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DA04402 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:31:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from strudel.ki.iif.hu (strudel.ki.iif.hu [IPv6:2001:738:0:411:20f:1fff:fe6e:ec1e]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D4CD2096 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:31:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bolha.lvs.iif.hu (bolha.lvs.iif.hu [193.225.14.181]) by strudel.ki.iif.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E0B2519; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:31:44 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at bolha.lvs.iif.hu Received: from strudel.ki.iif.hu ([IPv6:::ffff:193.6.222.244]) by bolha.lvs.iif.hu (bolha.lvs.iif.hu [::ffff:193.225.14.72]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 76Gqke-+WUfz; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:31:32 +0100 (CET) Received: by strudel.ki.iif.hu (Postfix, from userid 9002) id 296214FF; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:31:32 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by strudel.ki.iif.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FCA84F4; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:31:32 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:31:32 +0100 (CET) From: Mohacsi Janos X-X-Sender: mohacsi@strudel.ki.iif.hu To: Polytropon Subject: Re: using freebsd-update to revert back to GENERIC config files? In-Reply-To: <20131111220338.ed645ada.freebsd@edvax.de> Message-ID: References: <52813F9D.5090802@niif.hu> <20131111220338.ed645ada.freebsd@edvax.de> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (DEB 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:31:45 -0000 On Mon, 11 Nov 2013, Polytropon wrote: > On Mon, 11 Nov 2013 21:35:41 +0100, Janos Mohacsi wrote: >> Is there a clean way to overvwrite these files with the GENERIC during >> 9.2-RELEASE upgrade? > > Don't confuse GENERIC (the name of the configuration file for > the kernel distributed with FreeBSD releases) with the stock > configuration files. There is no direct relationship. > > You could try to copy the (unmodified, stock) configuration > files if you have used freebsd-update to get the "src" > distribution, i. e. the /usr/src tree. Here you will find > the /usr/src/etc directory from which you could "make install", > and there's also the /usr/src/etc/mail subdirectory with the > configuration files that would go to /etc/mail - you can try > to copy them manually. Thanks for the hint. I tried without success: mohacsi@csoki> pwd /usr/src/etc/sendmail mohacsi@csoki> sudo make distribution install -o root -g wheel -m 644 /usr/src/etc/sendmail/freebsd.mc freebsd.cf /etc/mail install -o root -g wheel -m 444 /usr/src/etc/sendmail/freebsd.submit.mc freebsd.submit.cf /etc/mail install -o root -g wheel -m 444 /usr/src/etc/sendmail/../../contrib/sendmail/src/helpfile /etc/mail install -o root -g wheel -m 640 /dev/null /var/log/sendmail.st install -o root -g wheel -m 644 freebsd.cf /etc/mail/sendmail.cf install -o root -g wheel -m 444 freebsd.submit.cf /etc/mail/submit.cf mohacsi@csoki> sudo freebsd-update fetch Looking up update.FreeBSD.org mirrors... 5 mirrors found. Fetching metadata signature for 9.1-RELEASE from update6.freebsd.org... done. Fetching metadata index... done. Inspecting system... done. Preparing to download files... done. The following files are affected by updates, but no changes have been downloaded because the files have been modified locally: /etc/mail/freebsd.cf /etc/mail/freebsd.submit.cf /etc/mail/sendmail.cf /etc/mail/submit.cf /var/db/mergemaster.mtree .... > > Of course, it's "cleaner" to use mergemaster to deal with > modified configuration files, such as it is being done around > a "make installworld" run, but as you said you're using the > binary update method, the system should forgive my suggestion > of the unholy blasphemy that arises from manually copying > files. :-) What is the source where freebsd-update checking the neccessary changes? mergemaster.mtree? Regards, Janos Mohacsi From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 12 15:12:21 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D06D5221 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:12:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm27-vm7.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm27-vm7.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [216.39.63.205]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 875F823C2 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:12:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [216.39.60.167] by nm27.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Nov 2013 15:12:15 -0000 Received: from [98.138.104.96] by tm3.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Nov 2013 15:12:15 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp116.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Nov 2013 15:12:15 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=att.net; s=s1024; t=1384269135; bh=xXHwnmvQX8O6imZ6Hds9cfR7dlvQtZZiVSG+j0rjqVg=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-Rocket-Received:Message-ID:Date:From:User-Agent:MIME-Version:To:Subject:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ZWBVwiimd11Lmv3K/O23Bx+JNlVT0o+FspjoCMdVNCEXh1S3Sob3zD2XPmM2KmJmpL8RWlwNs/2AoXmkBq/jSyw3i9FnfgsKHlsKc70bJWwu69KcT4OwizuWXCIX69yWn8zWqW5lkH6lJuzwkAW0YSYeshl5kX6xCopnJplJjTk= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 645714.6042.bm@smtp116.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: 2TUaoqcVM1kuKmFvowmpJe_cE8UC5tJjDTqsgaifUQqnO_7 q7umeZiMUOGs_jjouUrNRD4xeA6EzEnj0GsMaXS8SzkVhZKD6D6pdhOxNag5 ZM14s2LHj729wFnKa6dQi.MxhBihTZuSht96GzVFAGTbQ_l3ysPu1tfmgyDD hwp7eUpATYHWb4hQzdHJjbZQRhQOV7p.SfQRL8zEYeAPVFEqPzcauf86Phgc ohrsMJ7uV78eEsiJOi306HwYVvkHsNCUO3vQVisCX2iDfhr4H.B_Gbr85OMm Tue1rp7lmX7u3ZVHScFI3GHZbOnDzQCfOqLtFxKG4qNr3tVFrqybIbXxmRO_ _hs1OTKD0i0Vun1CUGth6fQKXLg949rxmSYxJJrvHHAPZA.dJ3lU2Np9QtNk aeus26K4N0pqCA9oD2ZAOjZFLkpexRtIKk0tlp5MiFCEO05yUN_9rSix4waS zTx2Czy__UbgDdt_WisLnCh7kkCx6xfkLadEnWEpyWDwvG80i82nkdGgL1m0 AnNhGx3DE9mJoytUu6uvSmub_gWKWtJ9ZwHw- X-Yahoo-SMTP: dQDeuIqswBBZlqxPL_idatjeqZFsZlQC4MQ5I3DYpsI- X-Rocket-Received: from [135.207.130.101] (k.oikonomou@135.207.130.101 with ) by smtp116.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 12 Nov 2013 15:12:15 +0000 UTC Message-ID: <5282454E.3030902@att.net> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 10:12:14 -0500 From: Kostas Oikonomou User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/17.0 Thunderbird/17.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: pkg upgrade problem with tex and texlive, release 9.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:12:21 -0000 Hi, I am using PCBSD 9.2 p8, and I'm having a problem with "pkg upgrade". I am using texlive instead of tetex, and when I try to upgrade my packages, pkg insists on re-installing the main two tetex packages, which I've removed, since I have switched to texlive. Of course, if I let the upgrade proceed, it fails because of the conflict between tetex and texlive. I can remove texlive, do the upgrade, re-remove tetex, and re-re-install texlive. Texlive is a large package, so this is painful. And it will happen again at the next upgrade. Is there any way around this problem? Some feature of pkg that I don't know about? Or is this whole thing a tetex/texlive-specific issue which will be resolved eventually? (I am posting here in the belief that this is not a PCBSD-specific issue.) Kostas From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 12 15:21:21 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92672509 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:21:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm14.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm14.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.90.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 336AE2473 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:21:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.138.100.111] by nm14.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Nov 2013 15:21:14 -0000 Received: from [98.138.89.174] by tm100.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Nov 2013 15:21:14 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1030.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Nov 2013 15:21:14 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 610855.8237.bm@omp1030.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 11672 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Nov 2013 15:21:13 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1384269673; bh=9YYMz4+prAfRjvOY6hln6CpPDoazGqQxAEkVJ9OA88I=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=5r/0aRBgtNLfhBk733+5pfuzsQHy7GkGZzJxNdmOP7IWN5KN5OErU4JJ7djhpAGEOwZZqxTdKABex285Idae6e+XY/FeZ3z/SDg/XhKIEP0QgaBGD7ghM/Wy3Z10wrWt5fRxaluopvD+glZhSnmWFD5DlxuXWomMIe469ix7KZo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:References:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=Ajy2bDbLfesmXsAR4pD6FZ+DAzHptRwQNc0Hd+/i+8W1lpJwC2/RFuL+z73mE9EPUuZGOthBKn1A4uVxHsktpuRg/ewVEajsm1+bRjafZSz8WtzaTVMnpOZeY0bh2YUQxKGto3Q42zJchS4PLW/p81sf5dRIRzyyEuYwC7UPbuo=; X-YMail-OSG: DMdMaUQVM1m89fNlVNF26pBvgGyL33kn_k04HSMOCfDMRm0 EnMh1z3PACrnvvYz6r4gUXH7jK1YXvP4BrNqvVRgRtQGmA1EVVqXoDlSOW__ AtYVH2ZH18qnqOiy_SnFnOXtxTTCgZ_A6e7Sr4tss_5e.jpogVlMV6v2fyiM o_baqeAOLq0k2rv5pGq.w.klaZUvjFvaqG3VvUP6PibvVDox7AGTiksGxii1 QLgYWmPTvpywRIVuZxv.K4Ati8SarOrcJPy9xr_KHBbHQTmjXH4GV5g5Oh7i jkCOwvJsdypVLfH9udhenvAxJRlEDxnkuQLi5.It9wcj7orGNAREIXV4qmHA X2JR1LQTySOTBFhUvSN.9S4JncN6FBBf9yCJP.TYEYRy6u1YdDrkn33HumzP yY29cnu4tMPtJP2Vslwxv7lt.Vct.uSTIa780dGlUozbAN1dQvw9c9PiDxxF UAjQFvmx52sD6o4guxmWQta6lP4HEyoHLpc_lrqjo.A4c54S_jo2xcEgYUlj UDYZ276V9ku8P8VzGGwGuOj.4jkvWsXLwXtZo.CSNnmPdczBOuhl73SKNRrU VygobhuOiiewEGe5cDCbMYUceU2DJu6iXmg-- Received: from [124.43.66.203] by web161901.mail.bf1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 07:21:13 PST X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001, CgoKCi0tLS0tIE9yaWdpbmFsIE1lc3NhZ2UgLS0tLS0KPiBGcm9tOiBQb2x5dHJvcG9uIDxmcmVlYnNkQGVkdmF4LmRlPgo.IFRvOiAiZnJlZWJzZC1xdWVzdGlvbnNAZnJlZWJzZC5vcmciIDxmcmVlYnNkLXF1ZXN0aW9uc0BmcmVlYnNkLm9yZz4KPiBDYzogVW5nYSA8dW5nYTg4OEB5YWhvby5jb20.Cj4gU2VudDogVHVlc2RheSwgTm92ZW1iZXIgMTIsIDIwMTMgMTo0MSBQTQo.IFN1YmplY3Q6IFJlOiBLREU0IGNyYXNoZWQsIGhvdyB0byByZWNvdmVyPwo.IAo.IE9uIFR1ZSwgMTIgTm92IDIwMTMgMDU6MjMBMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.163.597 References: <1384262588.31259.YahooMailNeo@web161905.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> <20131112144104.a1034dd1.freebsd@edvax.de> Message-ID: <1384269673.7565.YahooMailNeo@web161901.mail.bf1.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 07:21:13 -0800 (PST) From: Unga Subject: Re: KDE4 crashed, how to recover? To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" In-Reply-To: <20131112144104.a1034dd1.freebsd@edvax.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list Reply-To: Unga List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:21:21 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- > From: Polytropon > To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" > Cc: Unga > Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 1:41 PM > Subject: Re: KDE4 crashed, how to recover? > > On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 05:23:08 -0800 (PST), Unga wrote: > >> [...] >> Computer hanged, had to force power down from the power button. >> >> After that FreeBSD runs well but when try to start KDE, it prints >> following and immediately reboots: >> >> Generating KDM configuration. >> panic: Bad effnlink fip 0x..., fdp 0x..., tdp 0x.... >> cpuid = 2 >> KDB: stack backtrace: >> #0 0x... at kdb_backtrace >> #1 0x... at panic >> #2 0x... at ufs_rename >> #3 0x... at VOP_RENAME_APV >> #4 0x... at kern_renameat >> #5 0x... at kern_rename >> #6 0x... at sys_rename >> #7 0x... at syscall >> #8 0x... at Xint0x80_syscall >> >> How to recover from this issue? > > Make sure your file systems have been successfully repaired. > It's useful to boot into single user mode and perform a fsck > of all partitions _prior_ to continuing the boot process. > Note that a background fsck could still be running while you > try to restart KDE with an underlying inconsistent filesystem. > To intendedly avoid booting into a possibly dirty filesystem > environment, put background_fsck="NO" into /etc/rc.conf, but > note that, depending on the size of your disks, startup time > will probably increase dramatically. :-) > > Still it's hard to imagine how a file system defect could cause > that immediate kind of kernel panic... > Hi Polytropon and Julian Thanks for replies. File system dirty was indeed the case. I rebooted with a liveCD and ran fsck with -f, and it solved the problem. Thanks again. Unga From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 12 16:46:28 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9895CD2B for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 16:46:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nm21-vm4.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm21-vm4.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.91.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ECA512B7E for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 16:46:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.138.101.128] by nm21.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Nov 2013 16:43:34 -0000 Received: from [98.138.89.198] by tm16.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Nov 2013 16:43:34 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1056.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 12 Nov 2013 16:43:34 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 474005.55165.bm@omp1056.mail.ne1.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 16897 invoked by uid 60001); 12 Nov 2013 16:43:34 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1384274614; bh=pLTmevAAmJFToIDYIqOc1Vpe+cM5l/+UAgMMfV9DNM4=; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=auq1jP8h/KiPcV2CI8lJ2G12oA6KR5nhosT6dv69ogub0j2wWcr3II5wfaVC4dauNPjD4MeksaxNVfHj2bzPYmGANDQvHOvICz04BTftUgTuOSfhnMQWxqIcCvlN/sX8YECMA3hcKc+oHItulaDHEfC5z+K8o4whAZKzjAJTPSc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Rocket-MIMEInfo:X-Mailer:Message-ID:Date:From:Reply-To:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=GklTIu5IBCQCjKShq8Op7C0qwA17xgHPVT0s3nxLE3U7KlEBgI9W4/9Eiauq0S93lwTJPtfAkEaU3vm9VYGfwgwKjk2VTuGOdS+7IPUIIalAbG0tbDr+u1s2d/X/MmnX32z7qo/gIykpALFpzudQvJznmWXwQfwnalf+Tj8WiI4=; X-YMail-OSG: 8f6w85UVM1msySEUqu6vVlxVpIERilKw4bN6iaephmRNyqN xODWayJPHwOGRZQ2W5RKRKTEX93JVozJ_HkXPT7rBHOZ8Jshzhb0077JKxPX wNHtvJz1r9cCVDBMMsjt1cazdBssdIPHwnpNTDNZ3VJXcrkNVdBTUzjWlZI6 .tty8.OkTro.vwVsaMlEOMwF7Esm6OtYsMIWzXrnglzVX0kgfTISwFCJ7.hg zh.BtxJQV_Q8PGRdpDrbaREMheY.pcUb5FJlZA0_JvWNllrwFrJ3NFvX8xat w6wwiLcusvDo1pH90GKPMWmqXXoUGq84dHq6x__XQ8ZJ15KfoKUimCfZxaN5 y541vVmLgVd4EVYNFXOvC_KEtqfqZ1w6FSfXXr9XPoH8oLMHDbIYSZy1HcCx 2RYEgoqewcdV2OI_rWA3p5B7Lj_wDQBMD4JA_kRQisF73IlxJ8WxQmxzkTLc QhawKW_InHP6xMfybBzra0Rrc7BDNnTvEQJYhCcVfu8xBOQqhKyQAdpb4leS M..eO1GAmw.M7M98l4Yafu2SlWLUFft2lWP3sGJkGJ9PJQqMRoPAToLhLdLo mDx3LhCVDkK4qqF5VuwoemR3LmucQih8C7873OxDZ.xMLc.k99PFSldY5plM qRcTANnacBhOqeHjNDm0cajihJT.fFAwn Received: from [117.213.254.103] by web125404.mail.ne1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 08:43:34 PST X-Rocket-MIMEInfo: 002.001, SGksCsKgIMKgIEkgaGF2ZSBhIHZlcnkgYmFzaWMgcXVlc3Rpb24gYWJvdXQgb2J0YWluaW5nIHRoZSBzb3VyY2UgY29kZS4KwqAgwqAgSSBoYXZlIGxlYXJudCB0aGF0IG9uZSBvZiB0aGUgd2F5cyBvZiBvYnRhaW5pbmcgdGhlIHNvdXJjZSBjb2RlIG9mIHRoZSByZWxlYXNlLCBvciBvZiBhbnkgc3RhbmRhcmQgcHJvZ3JhbSB0aGF0IGdldHMgc2hpcHBlZCBpbiBzdGFuZGFyZCByZWxlYXNlIGlzIGJ5IHZpc2l0aW5nIHRoZSBodHRwOi8vc3Zud2ViLmZyZWVic2Qub3JnL2Jhc2UgYW5kIG5hdmlnYXRpbmcgZnUBMAEBAQE- X-Mailer: YahooMailWebService/0.8.163.597 Message-ID: <1384274614.15224.YahooMailNeo@web125404.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 08:43:34 -0800 (PST) From: Sreeram BS Subject: Obtaining source code To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.16 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list Reply-To: Sreeram BS List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 16:46:28 -0000 Hi,=0A=A0 =A0 I have a very basic question about obtaining the source code.= =0A=A0 =A0 I have learnt that one of the ways of obtaining the source code = of the release, or of any standard program that gets shipped in standard re= lease is by visiting the http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base and navigating furt= her.=A0=0A=A0 =A0 =A0I am curious to know if there are any other methods of= obtaining the source code.=0A=0APlease inform.=0A=0ARegards,|=0ASreeram From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 12 17:01:37 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C1343E5 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 17:01:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.lamaiziere.net (net.lamaiziere.net [37.59.62.186]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 653FA2CA1 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 17:01:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mr129166.localdomain (mr129166.cri.univ-rennes1.fr [129.20.129.166]) by smtp.lamaiziere.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8B0AF2207; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 17:53:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from mr129166 (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mr129166.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C42950C4; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 17:53:10 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 17:53:09 +0100 From: Patrick Lamaiziere To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Obtaining source code Message-ID: <20131112175309.4f751c89@mr129166> In-Reply-To: <1384274614.15224.YahooMailNeo@web125404.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <1384274614.15224.YahooMailNeo@web125404.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd9.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (smtp.lamaiziere.net [0.0.0.0]); Tue, 12 Nov 2013 17:53:14 +0100 (CET) Cc: Sreeram BS X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 17:01:37 -0000 Le Tue, 12 Nov 2013 08:43:34 -0800 (PST), Sreeram BS a écrit : > Hi, >     I have a very basic question about obtaining the source code. >     I have learnt that one of the ways of obtaining the source code > of the release, or of any standard program that gets shipped in > standard release is by visiting the http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base > and navigating further. I am curious to know if there are any other > methods of obtaining the source code. Sure you can use subversion (in ports) to checkout the sources See http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/svn.html Regards From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 12 18:39:23 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6AFBC09 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 18:39:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D2022BD8 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 18:39:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-117-74.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.117.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 326682767D; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 19:39:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id rACId8TU001936; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 19:39:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 19:39:08 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Sreeram BS Subject: Re: Obtaining source code Message-Id: <20131112193908.5aa3112f.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <1384274614.15224.YahooMailNeo@web125404.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> References: <1384274614.15224.YahooMailNeo@web125404.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 18:39:23 -0000 On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 08:43:34 -0800 (PST), Sreeram BS wrote: > Hi, > =A0 =A0 I have a very basic question about obtaining the source code. > =A0 =A0 I have learnt that one of the ways of obtaining the source code > of the release, or of any standard program that gets shipped in > standard release is by visiting the http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base > and navigating further.=A0 > =A0 =A0 =A0I am curious to know if there are any other methods of > obtaining the source code. >=20 > Please inform. Additionally to using a SVN implementation (e. g. the "subversion" from the ports collection) you can use the following methods: 1. Download the "src" distribution from one of the mirrors, for example ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/i386/9.2-REL= EASE/src.txz 2. Download the installation media and extract the "src" distribution (from src.txz on the media). 3. Use freebsd-update to obtain the "src" distribution (see "man freebsd-update" for details), it will update your local /usr/src directory. --=20 Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 12 20:28:52 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 595458B1 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 20:28:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.1970jan1-epo.ch (1970jan1-epo.ch [37.252.125.93]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2297423CF for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 20:28:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from 1970jan1-epo.ch (184-63-79-123.cust.wildblue.net [184.63.79.123]) by mail.1970jan1-epo.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ACB301FEE90; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 20:21:33 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 12:19:38 -0800 From: Kyle Williams To: Hung Son Nguyen Subject: Re: Bootstrapping pkg the FreeBSD Jail Message-ID: <20131112201938.GA13195@1970jan1-epo.ch> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 20:28:52 -0000 On Sun Nov 10 02:55:50 2013, Hung Son Nguyen wrote: >Can I bootstrap pkg without enter the Jail? If you use ezjail, you can install .tbz ports made with `make package' during jail creation. Ezjail has an rc.d script that installs anything in /pkg the first time the jail starts. Create an ezjail flavour with pkg.tbz in /pkg, and pkg will be automatically installed when you start a jail created with `ezjail-admin -f [flavour] [hostname] [ip]' If you don't want to build the .tbz yourself, you can grab an old version from here: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/packages/ports-mgmt/pkg-1.1.4_1.tbz You can also add other commands to the rc.d script, like pkg2ng. If you don't use ezjail, you can use `pkg_add -C /yourjail' to install the .tbz file. -- Kyle Williams Kyle@1970Jan1-epo.ch PGP key: 0xF9DF9C31 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 12 21:12:24 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 224E3EB9 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 21:12:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1A912712 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 21:12:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 7463033C25; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 16:12:23 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: "Gerard Seibert" Subject: Re: unbound and ntp in FreeBSD 10 Beta 3 References: <00dc01cedf99$5e1c0cd0$1a542670$@seibercom.net> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 16:12:23 -0500 In-Reply-To: <00dc01cedf99$5e1c0cd0$1a542670$@seibercom.net> (Gerard Seibert's message of "Tue, 12 Nov 2013 06:21:43 -0500") Message-ID: <44d2m5b9zc.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 21:12:24 -0000 "Gerard Seibert" writes: > I just did a fresh install of FreeBSD 10 Beta 3 on a clean > machine. For whatever reason, I am having the following problem. > > I added this to the rc.conf file: > > local_unbound_enable="YES" > > I also have: > > ntpd_enable="YES" > > in the file. > > This is the resolv.conf file: > > #Generated by resolvconf > #nameserver 209.18.47.61 > #nameserver 209.18.47.62 > #nameserver 192.168.1.1 > > nameserver 127.0.0.1 > options edns0 > > Now, with this configuration, ntpd never resolves any of the addresses > it needs to work. My screen fills up with error messages. If I Can any other programs resolve addresses? > uncomment the three nameserver entries it works fine until the next > reboot. I had to comment out the unbound line in the rc.conf file to > prevent it from causing the resolv.conf file from being over written > > I obviously have something configured incorrectly. Can anyone help me > with this? Also, what do the "options" mean? I cannot find any > documentation on it. There are options documented in resolv.conf(5), but edns0 isn't one of them. I believe it is supported by the libraries on some other Unix-ish systems. Most likely, resolv.conf isn't the source of the problem, and your version of that file would work fine if unbound were working. If I'm guessing correctly, unbound is not starting at all. You can test this easily by enabling unbound and then restarting it. You may get some informative information printed out or entered into logs at that time. My guess is that it won't actually start at all, and the diagnostic messages will tell you why. It will almost certainly be because you didn't set up unbound.conf properly; very likely you missed either an "interface" or "forward-zone" setting. Good luck. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 12 22:05:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02AF795D for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 22:05:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x231.google.com (mail-we0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 977EB2B19 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 22:05:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f177.google.com with SMTP id t60so3014468wes.36 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:05:09 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=KWrVF8HWvqbNVmj2/hRZ1r7mtWRrKWK+ps36TzmLwXA=; b=LayM94Mty8r/lytUpGZh46/mbbZuvkf5QjCK8CTbvkoojAsS0PJqHfn5L4QT7ms8dL 81H2rFssZVcD5VQL7lkEfgfCCxLvSUaT48FcjCfOXfmkD7OqCmpv1LGCxV9uWgbsLhBz fHmgs/js7olQCTViOm26EIBDdDZv4Q6aTx7OHGmITGmmh9cWH9t7xtFRy29FI+3wx4iC T2Fb3vA1POcS4TPbUVikr4L/p7tbRH7R+/BsKKY9IJh5u/vCEB4RKAy/GiWb9PQNCgxf etZDGNXCCWyfRYnxNqVamTuizkv4elfiR/ajnTG/YxDXFz1R2K5EVnpeh8ty6ldnxdjb rX1Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.187.41 with SMTP id fp9mr18008166wic.33.1384293909133; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:05:09 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.3.5 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:05:09 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 23:05:09 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Program to view PCD files From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=EDa?= To: User Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.16 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 22:05:11 -0000 Hi, Do we have anything in ports to view PCD[1] files? I can't find anything like that. Thanks in advance. [1] http://pointclouds.org/documentation/tutorials/pcd_file_format.php From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 12 22:31:21 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B63334E for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 22:31:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEF6E2CD0 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 22:31:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VgMUJ-0002Di-LO for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 23:31:11 +0100 Received: from 65.75.36.70 ([65.75.36.70]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 23:31:11 +0100 Received: from gyliamos by 65.75.36.70 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 23:31:11 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Will Parsons Subject: Re: Problem with wireless router inaccessibility Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 22:30:50 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 39 Message-ID: References: <78.D4.19454.7704F725@cdptpa-oedge03> <527FEAF9.70300@onetel.com> <6A.C3.19454.0D9A0825@cdptpa-oedge03> <84.EC.19454.49002825@cdptpa-oedge03> X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 65.75.36.70 User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list Reply-To: gyliamos@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 22:31:21 -0000 Thomas Mueller wrote: > from Will Parsons and my previous post: > >> > Did you regain login access to the router? > >> As I said, I temporarily set a static IP address in /etc/rc.conf: > >> defaultrouter="10.0.1.1" >> ifconfig_re0="10.0.1.7 netmask 255.255.255.0" > > But would the router respond on 10.0.1.1? Well, it will if its IP address is 10.0.1.1. (That's what I set *mine* to; I don't know about yours.) > Could you do this at command prompt as opposed to /etc/rc.conf? Yes, using suitable invocations of the ifconfig(8) and route(8) commands. Check the man pages. >> But, if I understand you, you can reach the router (e.g., via ping), >> but if you attempt to go to http://192.168.1.1 (or whatever), you >> don't get a login screen? > > I get a login screen from the bedroom computer using System Rescue > CD 3.6.0 and Midori web browser, but not from living-room computer. Bedroom computer is via Ethernet, right? So you have a login screen but it won't accept your login name and password? If so, you need to supply correct credentials, even if that means setting the router back to factory defaults. Thw problem with the living-room computer (connected via wireless, I assume?) may be that by default you can't log in remotely. You can change that configuration option, but you have to be able to log in via the Ethernet first. -- Will From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 12 22:53:55 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9738CCAB for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 22:53:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qe0-x22b.google.com (mail-qe0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c02::22b]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 527972E9B for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 22:53:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qe0-f43.google.com with SMTP id gc15so15936qeb.30 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:53:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=PR7Yvz5g87EF2/4Sb535+rs+S0lC/mDDQtFdtuqV7ME=; b=qbLjZE4F9oT5Hu30wrAi52XeRZJqO0rxt6oyn3O6+3cioaRFKJWiWG2JzSR2hDH/2A uLHRjVFWksZWneS7GlagP38kLimeiHmoSTCDpVRS0xFuJavkVje+fxsht/nK5GxpYVgT T2Nz1xDVtuKYb/hAkUip3gjis2YLP1E43OIQE= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :thread-index:content-language; bh=PR7Yvz5g87EF2/4Sb535+rs+S0lC/mDDQtFdtuqV7ME=; b=aG4j1lae9SUQVuOXbp7Sxl0/dQunR9SPLCZel3isTG9YTK1J121u6H/AjgKtvMRYbX TRTNk2nC6Qf5Bq/ecOQFfbCsr3lDuFtgv9MX+HP6eg5W9HCts5ldBulv1HZho0qq5H2T q7JZ740oEZu4rh+oST9YLloduZVBD4MfoI0vHN9vXRnsPMPBP+tffCYDy+AcWjYDNdj1 HOhrGVSeHJRCiRuTFpsYyt89tGtKcHQeRUEs64m9oUbdfirFIzpY4myUpRGA9QvxP/lV 0vqCaAfATmgxnyb1xRlV4gbq7I2vPN5E4Eyq3qtPt+DhBzTC2vste9utUh9AldVMFaam 6OOQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQncff/X1UEyneEk4hoy6VXa+6I47Kpq773fz6zpsECeKy9hWrfIt1etH99XJKbYLBc0EB/0 X-Received: by 10.49.59.133 with SMTP id z5mr60691486qeq.18.1384296834166; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:53:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from boss530 (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id b9sm64225526qas.7.2013.11.12.14.53.53 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 12 Nov 2013 14:53:53 -0800 (PST) From: "Gerard Seibert" To: References: <00dc01cedf99$5e1c0cd0$1a542670$@seibercom.net> <44d2m5b9zc.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <44d2m5b9zc.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Subject: RE: unbound and ntp in FreeBSD 10 Beta 3 Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 17:53:40 -0500 Message-ID: <005401cedffa$087868d0$19693a70$@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-Index: AQJKhAPsi7S+GhcLnHqCuXRiRXXgvwESfsjHmSJVgDA= Content-Language: en-us X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 22:53:55 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Lowell Gilbert [mailto:freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org] > Sent: Tuesday, November 12, 2013 4:12 PM > To: Gerard Seibert > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: unbound and ntp in FreeBSD 10 Beta 3 >=20 > "Gerard Seibert" writes: >=20 > > I just did a fresh install of FreeBSD 10 Beta 3 on a clean machine. > > For whatever reason, I am having the following problem. > > > > I added this to the rc.conf file: > > > > local_unbound_enable=3D"YES" > > > > I also have: > > > > ntpd_enable=3D"YES" > > > > in the file. > > > > This is the resolv.conf file: > > > > #Generated by resolvconf > > #nameserver 209.18.47.61 > > #nameserver 209.18.47.62 > > #nameserver 192.168.1.1 > > > > nameserver 127.0.0.1 > > options edns0 > > > > Now, with this configuration, ntpd never resolves any of the = addresses > > it needs to work. My screen fills up with error messages. If I >=20 > Can any other programs resolve addresses? >=20 > > uncomment the three nameserver entries it works fine until the next > > reboot. I had to comment out the unbound line in the rc.conf file to > > prevent it from causing the resolv.conf file from being over written > > > > I obviously have something configured incorrectly. Can anyone help = me > > with this? Also, what do the "options" mean? I cannot find any > > documentation on it. >=20 > There are options documented in resolv.conf(5), but edns0 isn't one of > them. I believe it is supported by the libraries on some other = Unix-ish > systems. Most likely, resolv.conf isn't the source of the problem, and = your > version of that file would work fine if unbound were working. >=20 > If I'm guessing correctly, unbound is not starting at all. You can = test this easily > by enabling unbound and then restarting it. You may get some = informative > information printed out or entered into logs at that time. My guess is = that it > won't actually start at all, and the diagnostic messages will tell you = why. It will > almost certainly be because you didn't set up unbound.conf properly; = very > likely you missed either an "interface" or "forward-zone" setting. >=20 > Good luck. >From what I can find, I only have to place that declaration in the = rc.conf file to get unbound working. I found the info here: = http://blog.des.no/2013/09/local-caching-resolver-in-freebsd-10/ = However, I am not sure if I am also supposed to put the "service = local_unbound start" line into the rc.conf file also. If not; how am I = supposed to start the service? I think the directions could use a = little clarification. --=20 Jerry From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 12 23:00:53 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA5DAED2 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 23:00:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from st11p05mm-asmtp003.mac.com (st11p05mm-asmtp003.mac.com [17.172.108.248]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A37D82F27 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 23:00:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [17.198.13.205] (unknown [17.198.13.205]) by st11p05mm-asmtp003.mac.com (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7u4-27.08(7.0.4.27.7) 64bit (built Aug 22 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0MW600M4ZAL4NM30@st11p05mm-asmtp003.mac.com> for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 23:00:42 +0000 (GMT) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:5.10.8794,1.0.431,0.0.0000 definitions=2013-11-12_08:2013-11-12,2013-11-12,1970-01-01 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 spamscore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 bulkscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=7.0.1-1308280000 definitions=main-1311120206 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii MIME-version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.6 \(1510\)) Subject: Re: unbound and ntp in FreeBSD 10 Beta 3 From: Charles Swiger In-reply-to: <005401cedffa$087868d0$19693a70$@seibercom.net> Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 15:00:40 -0800 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Message-id: References: <00dc01cedf99$5e1c0cd0$1a542670$@seibercom.net> <44d2m5b9zc.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <005401cedffa$087868d0$19693a70$@seibercom.net> To: Gerard Seibert X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1510) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 23:00:53 -0000 Hi-- On Nov 12, 2013, at 2:53 PM, Gerard Seibert wrote: > =46rom what I can find, I only have to place that declaration in the = rc.conf file to get unbound working. I found the info here: = http://blog.des.no/2013/09/local-caching-resolver-in-freebsd-10/ = However, I am not sure if I am also supposed to put the "service = local_unbound start" line into the rc.conf file also. If not; how am I = supposed to start the service? I think the directions could use a = little clarification. Hmm...OK, what part of the below was unclear? # echo local_unbound_enable=3Dyes >>/etc/rc.conf # service local_unbound start The first line updates /etc/rc.conf to startup unbound upon system boot. You could edit /etc/rc.conf instead to add that line, if you prefer. The second line starts unbound immediately (ie, without rebooting). = It's a shell command which should be run as root, and not a config entry = for /etc/rc.conf. Regards, --=20 -Chuck From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 12 23:08:21 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63E9CD0 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 23:08:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28F5B2F93 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 23:08:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-117-74.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.117.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9708C3CEE2 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:08:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id rACN81sQ002940 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:08:01 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:08:01 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Subject: Re: unbound and ntp in FreeBSD 10 Beta 3 Message-Id: <20131113000801.23545a67.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <005401cedffa$087868d0$19693a70$@seibercom.net> References: <00dc01cedf99$5e1c0cd0$1a542670$@seibercom.net> <44d2m5b9zc.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <005401cedffa$087868d0$19693a70$@seibercom.net> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2013 23:08:21 -0000 On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 17:53:40 -0500, Gerard Seibert wrote: > From what I can find, I only have to place that declaration > in the rc.conf file to get unbound working. I found the info > here: http://blog.des.no/2013/09/local-caching-resolver-in-freebsd-10/ > However, I am not sure if I am also supposed to put the "service > local_unbound start" line into the rc.conf file also. If not; > how am I supposed to start the service? I think the directions > could use a little clarification. Even though /etc/rc.conf is a shell script (i. e., it is being sourced by other shell scripts), it should only contain the variable declarations. The entry local_unbound_enable="YES" should be sufficient to start unbound at system startup automatically. This entry is a requirement also for manually starting unbound after the system has been started, with the command # service local_unbound start as you've correctly mentioned. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 13 00:57:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88FE03AB for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:57:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ob0-f177.google.com (mail-ob0-f177.google.com [209.85.214.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 578AF2592 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:57:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ob0-f177.google.com with SMTP id wp4so4810635obc.36 for ; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 16:56:54 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=9isg0/O8etup9A6nazork+NE8qs/xMLO8PTfv50rYos=; b=KLFdVXj5LJWQ0nDyvbX6Bs8qvE/4GprSjRCjvrZAQn/kF5PEJVw7KMDg4RB0wNlBfX 4ZTGTsza24Ad1T71vXXKdC6IDRNzBgRYKuFRfnqyoHCm4ORYC8jD3jr82LDsipPWVa9M Zegmp7S+ViLYpFrSX2PRlBV5G+UajvGx3b2f2AN1jB6S1hLtzuMWWr0l1YgvVBiyHCkb bidB1cnOHGdf846RKAAdtWktW1A2afDo86PCv+0IljRzs/gtmLNt9Uule7jaTa8GcDPU nkyQBZtpAbG47m4sHyxpnh1Sh2nVJ3KWlYSmsIqvypSPwwCzTYsajbS5QtnGLzCqSK8N audg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk3KMsvfyth6lhTjXyAFJxUlDCSZa8VIuZt1KpdUNuGEpWdLQkuzXjr97eR9J5PFlyPN1sS MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.42.168 with SMTP id p8mr9625100oel.73.1384303724979; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 16:48:44 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.60.21.69 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Nov 2013 16:48:44 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:48:44 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: running freebsd-update install on 9.2-RELEASE - error From: Michael Sierchio To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.16 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 00:57:01 -0000 # freebsd-update install Installing updates.../usr/bin/install: Undefined symbol "gid_from_group" /usr/bin/install: Undefined symbol "gid_from_group" This was a fresh install of 9.2, not an upgrade I've seen this error discussed in the context of build/makeworld, but not here. This is a bit puzzling. I do have a custom kernel (these are Soekris boxes). FreeBSD logagg.lon.pivotallabs.com 9.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE #0: Wed Oct 23 16:10:56 UTC 2013 root@donkey.sf.pivotallabs.com:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/NET6501 i386 any suggestions? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 13 03:02:55 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C1CDC741 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 03:02:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.166.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 855882D6F for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 03:02:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [74.130.196.19] ([74.130.196.19:27849] helo=localhost) by cdptpa-oedge03 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.5.0.35861 r(Momo-dev:tip)) with ESMTP id BF/9E-19454-A9BE2825; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 03:01:47 +0000 Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 03:01:46 +0000 Message-ID: From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org References: Subject: Re: running freebsd-update install on 9.2-RELEASE - error X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.142:25 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 Cc: Michael Sierchio X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 03:02:55 -0000 from Michael Sierchio: > # freebsd-update install > Installing updates.../usr/bin/install: Undefined symbol "gid_from_group" > /usr/bin/install: Undefined symbol "gid_from_group" > This was a fresh install of 9.2, not an upgrade > I've seen this error discussed in the context of build/makeworld, but not > here. This is a bit puzzling. I do have a custom kernel (these are > Soekris boxes). > FreeBSD logagg.lon.pivotallabs.com 9.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE #0: Wed Oct 23 16:10:56 UTC 2013 > root@donkey.sf.pivotallabs.com:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/NET6501 > i386 > any suggestions? How do you use freebsd-update on a fresh install? As far as I know, freebsd-update is for binary upgrade from an already-installed FreeBSD. What do you run "freebsd-update install" from if it's a fresh install? Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 13 05:57:17 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B239E17A for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 05:57:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.166.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DACC2565 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 05:57:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [74.130.196.19] ([74.130.196.19:48861] helo=localhost) by cdptpa-oedge02 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.5.0.35861 r(Momo-dev:tip)) with ESMTP id B0/CB-27821-BB413825; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 05:57:16 +0000 Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 05:57:15 +0000 Message-ID: From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org References: <78.D4.19454.7704F725@cdptpa-oedge03> <527FEAF9.70300@onetel.com> <6A.C3.19454.0D9A0825@cdptpa-oedge03> <84.EC.19454.49002825@cdptpa-oedge03> Subject: Re: Problem with wireless router inaccessibility X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.130:25 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 05:57:17 -0000 from Will Parsons: > Bedroom computer is via Ethernet, right? So you have a login screen > but it won't accept your login name and password? If so, you need to > supply correct credentials, even if that means setting the router back > to factory defaults. > Thw problem with the living-room computer (connected via wireless, I > assume?) may be that by default you can't log in remotely. You can > change that configuration option, but you have to be able to log in > via the Ethernet first. I can access the router and log in from the bedroom computer, connected by 25 ft Ethernet cable. That was with Midori web browser on System Rescue CD. I can even adjust settings. Living room computer is connected by shorter Ethernet cable. Can you actually set your router IP address using ifconfig(8) and route(8)? Some or many routers have the ability to back up your settings. With multiple wired and wireless ways to access the network, I might prefer command line over repeatedly modifying /etc/rc.conf . What about live CDs or USB that need to be nonspecific on wired or wireless connection? Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 13 13:16:45 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83B20166 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 13:16:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x22f.google.com (mail-wi0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2235820E3 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 13:16:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f175.google.com with SMTP id hm11so5206475wib.8 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 05:16:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Q/zSUtNq/ftwUBbt6IvjWfCGcFZV/+cg9rsc3NSiq4E=; b=nh/JyHD5D9yKa10Ar4unp4Y/GQcm/AXtIcPx9YPrK8mPct34l7L6avI7+2wK2eyRF+ y6fh+eTMSOno6v82WSD7A9aehXH2/gn968+nhv6yd5psv5A3ZdNzvamZZDQP4RftWvDS JaxGDgU0g/MsQ8Jn8QNQ93kB0WoYSRtiPf8yT/ghE+BbqgllIJuvzZ1MWh8HKPC+qP3v NP6fmHKbcpvLUThYgvELQpYNKIRfhf4dUcRLSmIMZpnasTdJe/mWL57J9rnPr/U9K/cP 1FCN7FbEUHE02g33Xjm9TfvzHwAsvOJftiqhJlD/WBqTsN42J4NtScoqqsCNokaaPyd8 pyPA== X-Received: by 10.180.8.98 with SMTP id q2mr20860504wia.26.1384348603648; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 05:16:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk. [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id dn2sm54926400wid.1.2013.11.13.05.16.42 for (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 13 Nov 2013 05:16:43 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 13:16:41 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: unbound and ntp in FreeBSD 10 Beta 3 Message-ID: <20131113131641.5140ef09@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <44d2m5b9zc.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> References: <00dc01cedf99$5e1c0cd0$1a542670$@seibercom.net> <44d2m5b9zc.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 13:16:45 -0000 On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 16:12:23 -0500 Lowell Gilbert wrote: > "Gerard Seibert" writes: > > > uncomment the three nameserver entries it works fine until the next > > reboot. I had to comment out the unbound line in the rc.conf file to > > prevent it from causing the resolv.conf file from being over written > > > > I obviously have something configured incorrectly. Can anyone help > > me with this? Also, what do the "options" mean? I cannot find any > > documentation on it. > > There are options documented in resolv.conf(5), but edns0 isn't one of > them. I believe it is supported by the libraries on some other > Unix-ish systems. Most likely, resolv.conf isn't the source of the > problem, and your version of that file would work fine if unbound > were working. > > If I'm guessing correctly, unbound is not starting at all. This looks like the cause of the problem: $ rcorder /etc/rc.d/* | grep -E "ntp|unbound" /etc/rc.d/ntpdate /etc/rc.d/ntpd /etc/rc.d/local_unbound From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 13 14:15:12 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 417C3FEA for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 14:15:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-x22a.google.com (mail-qc0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F12F724A3 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 14:15:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f170.google.com with SMTP id n9so250434qcw.15 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 06:15:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=LUAwnVYe2mdgThDM4FuZToGqicane9b3gvLYHx9mItk=; b=NTPsxc6I5UVZzB0WMf3dzad0wNeGqdBjiI4ox/Exs+80HqrZQJVoJdr65ObF4c2yYP 2kho7CEG5+eQ4ECuzlAF9VVJna+gCG0lMOrmvz+ruR6RB7lI4i2kN6wSfYibRQOXaE6X VNytntgdLWFjWELpxjKUNlTex3kcOdcHyj9PI= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :thread-index:content-language; bh=LUAwnVYe2mdgThDM4FuZToGqicane9b3gvLYHx9mItk=; b=LAatr18CszVHy6zfCPd41cet/pXGD1zeuM18hXbBdtsUhcVrLz+UceGz1tbyZqLONa e97VvGAfynKGpMYdLqYi2RoYQPzhuPPfDvX26BJ/SB0SD83FdWLroE4xsMRskIw2e4D3 88TpPRwaltoD7UCjsdKtzNeisQM4hBxs+1vKMahylbdjzft2RZqicfHd+1IgwQ5sxTwY +PWgUw+olgqy5ZXj2FcqRVQaD36E3cwnzxG+JkbigJ0VoogRi1z/UN0Q5xrsIo+KzJW8 5hXCnexuBK32b6OHsdD08P0JR4rKFnaO938DMlzxu08HQNa3tL7vzmzL5Fg5HBuLrBFC Rmxg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQm+HQIsvu2uUPSmmJaEnTetDoadm/rgwF0i6+2eCmPisOemTA7ZfsqSX0P86/iANTxW9N3z X-Received: by 10.49.6.6 with SMTP id w6mr65328678qew.43.1384352110994; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 06:15:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from boss530 (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id 5sm30365938qao.3.2013.11.13.06.15.10 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 13 Nov 2013 06:15:10 -0800 (PST) From: "Gerard Seibert" To: References: <00dc01cedf99$5e1c0cd0$1a542670$@seibercom.net> <44d2m5b9zc.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20131113131641.5140ef09@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20131113131641.5140ef09@gumby.homeunix.com> Subject: RE: unbound and ntp in FreeBSD 10 Beta 3 Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 09:14:57 -0500 Message-ID: <002901cee07a$bbafb6d0$330f2470$@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-Index: AQJKhAPsi7S+GhcLnHqCuXRiRXXgvwESfsjHAi9Q2+CZEd3hsA== Content-Language: en-us X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 14:15:12 -0000 > On Tue, 12 Nov 2013 16:12:23 -0500 > Lowell Gilbert wrote: >=20 > > writes: > > > > > uncomment the three nameserver entries it works fine until the = next > > > reboot. I had to comment out the unbound line in the rc.conf file = to > > > prevent it from causing the resolv.conf file from being over = written > > > > > > I obviously have something configured incorrectly. Can anyone help > > > me with this? Also, what do the "options" mean? I cannot find any > > > documentation on it. > > > > There are options documented in resolv.conf(5), but edns0 isn't one = of > > them. I believe it is supported by the libraries on some other > > Unix-ish systems. Most likely, resolv.conf isn't the source of the > > problem, and your version of that file would work fine if unbound = were > > working. > > > > If I'm guessing correctly, unbound is not starting at all. >=20 > This looks like the cause of the problem: >=20 > $ rcorder /etc/rc.d/* | grep -E "ntp|unbound" > /etc/rc.d/ntpdate > /etc/rc.d/ntpd > /etc/rc.d/local_unbound Okay, so was told by someone else on a chat line that the problem was = that "unbound" was not starting first. How should I go about rectifying = that? --=20 Jerry From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 13 14:49:41 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6342CD6B for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 14:49:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x234.google.com (mail-we0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::234]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00B2926E0 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 14:49:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f180.google.com with SMTP id u57so41563wes.11 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 06:49:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ko/BVAmUpOrsgROVcoFMENKQGPgKmTd8Wv3g2Lgum8M=; b=qZ+u3l1vqj7b8AcvPKz4bpiuNTfdJOmvXtrquB8k60i96QpKg1GkEhe0csqhApa7tA w5yyfTlHSWNpTMQvA/E5pxDsbussdoMkInq+aKDt/5gLRdyQg9WJ41/Mo59VhjuYzfgM Ie+ReO03twP/WuX++9ManK8wGwSaZLrBw7vSzu+JkbVHOtBl2o5J8WCTW4mgMWWWGoPN B93kVkI3ygxU/Oa2a/lle1CohYWuRAHW86eX9ha4w2dbhlvbib3Q5bEYQVZMGA4ua+t6 c80groooJG5fKekOG65pAzMcqm4T3NW5LKhhyfjd4Wlp1RUfaoapFNi0LU4kBkMTnvVD eugg== X-Received: by 10.180.90.65 with SMTP id bu1mr4471713wib.15.1384354179365; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 06:49:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com (87-194-105-247.bethere.co.uk. [87.194.105.247]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id pi6sm55793931wic.3.2013.11.13.06.49.38 for (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 13 Nov 2013 06:49:38 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 14:49:37 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: unbound and ntp in FreeBSD 10 Beta 3 Message-ID: <20131113144937.089e8a2a@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <002901cee07a$bbafb6d0$330f2470$@seibercom.net> References: <00dc01cedf99$5e1c0cd0$1a542670$@seibercom.net> <44d2m5b9zc.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20131113131641.5140ef09@gumby.homeunix.com> <002901cee07a$bbafb6d0$330f2470$@seibercom.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 14:49:41 -0000 On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 09:14:57 -0500 Gerard Seibert wrote: > Okay, so was told by someone else on a chat line that the problem was > that "unbound" was not starting first. How should I go about > rectifying that? You shouldn't need to if you put an couple of external nameserver entries after the localhost entry in resolv.conf. Alternately you might try adding an extra rc file with: # PROVIDE: ORDERUNBOUND # REQUIRE: ntpd ntpdate # BEFORE: local_unbound From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 13 17:11:17 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8528253C for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 17:11:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from filter2.win.net (filter2.win.net [216.24.27.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48464207E for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 17:11:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nb-200.win.net (nb-200.win.net [216.24.27.200]) by filter2.win.net (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id rADHBGPx032066 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 12:11:16 -0500 Received: from Gantry (pool245.office.win.net [216.24.33.245]) by nb-200.win.net (Postfix) with SMTP id E8D223993B for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 12:11:15 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <92B5C18734B84C73AFC29E5DC0FF7C36@Gantry> From: "Joseph Mays" To: References: In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: Expand partition size after a raid array increase Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 12:11:17 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal Importance: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Live Mail 15.4.3538.513 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V15.4.3538.513 X-Spam-Score: undef - mays@win.net is whitelisted. X-CanIt-Geo: ip=216.24.27.200; country=US; region=KY; city=Louisville; postalcode=40204; latitude=38.2390; longitude=-85.7174; metrocode=529; areacode=502; http://maps.google.com/maps?q=38.2390,-85.7174&z=6 X-CanItPRO-Stream: Outbound:default (inherits from base:default) X-Canit-Stats-ID: 01KN5bgBm - ab0952f57675 - 20131113 X-Antispam-Training-Forget: http://filter.win.net/canit/b.php?i=01KN5bgBm&m=ab0952f57675&t=20131113&c=f X-Antispam-Training-Nonspam: http://filter.win.net/canit/b.php?i=01KN5bgBm&m=ab0952f57675&t=20131113&c=n X-Antispam-Training-Spam: http://filter.win.net/canit/b.php?i=01KN5bgBm&m=ab0952f57675&t=20131113&c=s X-Scanned-By: CanIt (www . roaringpenguin . com) on 216.24.27.102 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.16 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 17:11:17 -0000 My apologies. I was originally attaching the results of "gpart show" as = a screenshot because I was working through an internet kvm module on a = system several states away that was booted in standalone mode. But the = mailing list seems to strip off attachments, so I ssh'd into the system = in normal operation to get output of "gpart show" that I can cut and = paste here. root@warehouse:/root # gpart show mfid0 =3D> 34 17578327997 mfid0 GPT (10T) [CORRUPT] 34 128 1 freebsd-boot (64k) 162 1048576000 2 freebsd-ufs (500G) 1048576162 16521363328 4 freebsd-ufs (7.7T) 17569939490 8388540 3 freebsd-swap (4G) 17578328030 1 - free - (512B) -----Original Message-----=20 From: Joseph Mays=20 Sent: Monday, November 11, 2013 3:45 PM=20 To: Joseph Mays=20 Subject: Re: Expand partition size after a raid array increase=20 I have a freebsd box with an LSI Raid controller in it. It had 4 = 3-terabyte=20 drives configured in an 8TB array. I added a 5th drive and built that = into=20 the array. Of course, the amount of drive space that shows in operation = in=20 FreeBSD did not change, presumably because I need to resize the = partition. I was trying to follow the partition resizing instructions shown here = --- http://www.unibia.com/unibianet/freebsd/resize-your-existing-freebsd-root= -partitionslice-safely-without-re-installing but when I do the =E2=80=9Cgpart show =E2=80=9D I don=E2=80=99t see the = free space. What I do see is=20 a change in the apparent overall size of the disk and a set of = parititions=20 that don=E2=80=99t add up to the new size of the disk. How should I be going about increasing the size of the partition? From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 13 18:20:28 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 742AFA15 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 18:20:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from email2.allantgroup.com (email2.emsphone.com [199.67.51.116]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3331B2520 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 18:20:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (dan.emsphone.com [172.17.17.101]) by email2.allantgroup.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id rADIDVAq043739 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 13 Nov 2013 12:13:31 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: from dan.emsphone.com (smmsp@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.7/8.14.6) with ESMTP id rADIDVsa097019 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 13 Nov 2013 12:13:31 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan@dan.emsphone.com) Received: (from dan@localhost) by dan.emsphone.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id rADIDVRn097018; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 12:13:31 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from dan) Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 12:13:31 -0600 From: Dan Nelson To: Joseph Mays Subject: Re: Expand partition size after a raid array increase Message-ID: <20131113181331.GL63947@dan.emsphone.com> References: <92B5C18734B84C73AFC29E5DC0FF7C36@Gantry> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <92B5C18734B84C73AFC29E5DC0FF7C36@Gantry> X-OS: FreeBSD 9.1-STABLE User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98 at email2.allantgroup.com X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (email2.allantgroup.com [172.17.19.78]); Wed, 13 Nov 2013 12:13:32 -0600 (CST) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on email2.allantgroup.com X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.73 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 18:20:28 -0000 In the last episode (Nov 13), Joseph Mays said: > I have a freebsd box with an LSI Raid controller in it. It had 4 > 3-terabyte drives configured in an 8TB array. I added a 5th drive and > built that into the array. Of course, the amount of drive space that > shows in operation in FreeBSD did not change, presumably because I need to > resize the partition. > > I was trying to follow the partition resizing instructions shown here --- > > http://www.unibia.com/unibianet/freebsd/resize-your-existing-freebsd-root-partitionslice-safely-without-re-installing > > but when I do the "gpart show" I don't see the free space. What I do see > is a change in the apparent overall size of the disk and a set of > parititions that don't add up to the new size of the disk. > > How should I be going about increasing the size of the partition? > > root@warehouse:/root # gpart show mfid0 > => 34 17578327997 mfid0 GPT (10T) [CORRUPT] > 34 128 1 freebsd-boot (64k) > 162 1048576000 2 freebsd-ufs (500G) > 1048576162 16521363328 4 freebsd-ufs (7.7T) > 17569939490 8388540 3 freebsd-swap (4G) > 17578328030 1 - free - (512B) Your GPT partition table is showing up as corrupt. Is there anything in dmesg about that? Maybe your device has grown, and you just need to repair the GPT partition (gpart recover mfid0) to reflect the larger size. Also, try running "diskinfo -v mfid0" and see whether that shows the new size. Note that the instructions you linked to use MBR and BSD disklabels instead of GPT; neither MBR or BSD store the device size or store metadata at the end of the device, so if their provider grows, they can immediately take advantage of the new space. GPT stores a backup copy on the last sector, and refers to that location in the primary copy, so you always have to fixup your GPT every time you resize a device. -- Dan Nelson dnelson@allantgroup.com From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 13 18:56:45 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 740BD714 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 18:56:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blu0-omc4-s7.blu0.hotmail.com (blu0-omc4-s7.blu0.hotmail.com [65.55.111.146]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4345627AC for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 18:56:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BLU0-SMTP454 ([65.55.111.136]) by blu0-omc4-s7.blu0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 13 Nov 2013 10:55:38 -0800 X-TMN: [U/8mrKjRefn1NLiZwuVfsSa+1W+yWdHO] X-Originating-Email: [gonzalez-danny@hotmail.com] Message-ID: Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([190.247.151.96]) by BLU0-SMTP454.phx.gbl over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 13 Nov 2013 10:55:35 -0800 From: Daniel H Gonzalez To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org CC: Subject: ssh root@localhost Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 18:55:31 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Nov 2013 18:55:36.0240 (UTC) FILETIME=[F0122300:01CEE0A1] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 18:56:45 -0000 Rootme -- Enviado Danny From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 13 21:43:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8B9EE2D for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 21:43:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail5.networktest.com (mail5.networktest.com [204.109.60.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C6CA321EF for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 21:43:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail5.networktest.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11AD62FCC99 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 13:33:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail5.networktest.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail5.networktest.com [127.0.0.1]) (maiad, port 10024) with ESMTP id 42064-10 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 13:33:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from dhcp130.eng.networktest.com (ns.networktest.com [205.147.16.129]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: dnewman@networktest.com) by mail5.networktest.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C68EB2FCC96 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 13:33:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5283F043.1070908@networktest.com> Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 13:33:55 -0800 From: David Newman Organization: Network Test Inc. User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: increasing the size of the NanoBSD /cfg slice X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 21:43:12 -0000 Greetings. For NanoBSD running on FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE i386, what is the parameter to increase the size of the /cfg partition? There's a NANO_RAM_TMPVARSIZE option to set the sizes of the /tmp and /var RAM disks but I don't see a similar option in nanobsd.conf or nanobsd.sh for setting the size of the /cfg partition. The system currently allocates 1.4 Mbytes to /cfg, but I'll need at least 20 Mbytes of permanent storage. How to address? thanks dn ps. If there's a better forum for NanoBSD questions, please advise. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 13 21:52:45 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F02872B2 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 21:52:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from avasout02.plus.net (avasout02.plus.net [212.159.14.17]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FE1922C8 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 21:52:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.72] ([37.152.222.58]) by avasout02 with smtp id p9pa1m0061GCXnp019pccb; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 21:49:36 +0000 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=e4I/F8Z/ c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=OoWqxztqMieIN+7d6p1nbA==:117 a=OoWqxztqMieIN+7d6p1nbA==:17 a=0Bzu9jTXAAAA:8 a=2YU7Ix1lbqoA:10 a=-uOtqG0gjtIA:10 a=ihvODaAuJD4A:10 a=8nJEP1OIZ-IA:10 a=EBOSESyhAAAA:8 a=PkWhSPQMdfEA:10 a=x2m3GPe0AAAA:8 a=G5m8boDJOfDAtBGmCW4A:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 Message-ID: <5283F3DD.8040809@mansionfamily.plus.com> Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 21:49:17 +0000 From: james User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.2; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130107 Thunderbird/17.0.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: How can I change back from pcbsd to freebsd? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list Reply-To: james@mansionfamily.plus.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 21:52:46 -0000 I had 'upgraded' to TrueOS in the absence of pkg repos, but now I'd like to change back. In my freebsd-update.conf I have: ServerName fbsd-update.pcbsd.org I'm not 100% sure the update from 9.1 to 9.2 worked. uname -a gives: FreeBSD nas.lan 9.1-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE #0 r243825: Tue Dec 4 09:23:10 UTC 2012 root@farrell.cse.buffalo.edu:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 while clang -v gives: root@nas:/etc # clang -v FreeBSD clang version 3.3 (tags/RELEASE_33/final 183502) 20130610 Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd9.2 Thread model: posix Anyway, I'd like to pick up vanilla 9.2 if I can and then move to 10.0 with its release. Is it going to be possible? I have a ZFS data area but boot is on a hardware RAID1 with UFS. James From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 13 23:07:43 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59F5D4B7 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 23:07:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2065F281F for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 23:07:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-117-74.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.117.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3DC2A3D7B4; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 00:07:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id rADN7Nr6005373; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 00:07:23 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 00:07:23 +0100 From: Polytropon To: james@mansionfamily.plus.com Subject: Re: How can I change back from pcbsd to freebsd? Message-Id: <20131114000723.1f2dd913.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <5283F3DD.8040809@mansionfamily.plus.com> References: <5283F3DD.8040809@mansionfamily.plus.com> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 23:07:43 -0000 On Wed, 13 Nov 2013 21:49:17 +0000, james wrote: > I had 'upgraded' to TrueOS in the absence of pkg repos, but now I'd like > to change back. > [...] > Anyway, I'd like to pick up vanilla 9.2 if I can and then move to 10.0 > with its release. > > Is it going to be possible? I'd say the simplest way to do this is to obtain the sources for the desired system (9.2-RELEASE) and follow the easy instructions provided in the comment header of /usr/src/Makefile. >From that point, further following of the security updates and finally a binary upgrade to 10 via freebsd-update should be possible. You can use svn to check out the sources, or just download them from the FTP server (the src.txz file for the OS version you want to use). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 14 04:05:29 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C4777A8 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 04:05:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.leadmon.net (mail.leadmon.net [IPv6:2001:550:102:301::13]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E9DC2993 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 04:05:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from HDLDESKTOP (hdl-desktop.leadmon.net [10.0.0.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.leadmon.net (8.14.7/8.14.7/Blacklist) with ESMTP id rAE45RNX041431 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2013 23:05:27 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from howard@leadmon.net) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 mail.leadmon.net rAE45RNX041431 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=leadmon.net; s=default; t=1384401927; bh=A568z6c/YKfHBLVuDNs09Wx4bO35K4febtf3yHHlDdE=; h=From:To:Subject:Date; b=Ut/DmkO7n+dI6cDg0NFrCb6CrDqdM8bk9DsguNanR0ptkfaljQ5vdDa0SntSoOV7F ndPtFKR+YMUREZtKfucHK8uddLa5tcQ+q0muYlXH1h5w8Y+/pY+93VgjZQ+cyq4L+V eYcBghZ29DJGeXVZlzhffsYZTGflbCRtafpwT45g= From: "Howard Leadmon" To: Subject: Updating from 9.2 to 10.0-BETA3 Issues.. Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2013 23:05:24 -0500 Message-ID: <044201cee0ee$c0bc0970$42341c50$@leadmon.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: Ac7g7SeRv6agIb+ZRAmJNuo6dArOWg== Content-Language: en-us X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98 at vorlon.leadmon.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 04:05:29 -0000 I figured I would setup a test system and get my feet wet with trying to move from 9.2 to the current 10 that I know will be an official version soon. So I took my 9.2 system, and as I use svn to update my sources, I then replaced the /usr/src tree with the stable/10 branch, and went on to build world, kernels, and through the recommended way to update to the new branch. This all for the most part went very well, I got 10 built, I did the install, went to single user, updated all files, and rebooted and happy day here I am running 10.0. The problem stated when I went back per the documents, and ran the delete-old-libs, though the OS boots, now all kinda stuff is broken! I thought no problem, let's rebuild the ports tree again, as I didn't realize some of the stuff ended up in the newer package formats, so had stuff that was missed. Now trying to rebuild stuff like for example, mysql, I get errors like the following: ===> mysql56-client-5.6.14 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/cmake - found ===> Configuring for mysql56-client-5.6.14 ===> Performing in-source build /bin/mkdir -p /usr/ports/databases/mysql56-client/work/mysql-5.6.14 Shared object "libmd.so.5" not found, required by "cmake" *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/databases/mysql56-client [root@drazi /usr/ports/databases/mysql56-client]# So I went back again, make sure I fully did a buildworld, and installed it, thinking maybe some libs got wacked, but alas that didn't fix anything. So the question is, if I am updating from 9.2 to 10.0 on a machine, how the heck can I get all of the extra software to build, as I can't get really much of anything to build at this point, be it mysql, or subversion, or any of the add-on packages to make the server useful. Glad I tried this on a test machine.. Any ideas/suggestions on how to get this straight? --- Howard Leadmon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 14 05:00:25 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05914E0E for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 05:00:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.166.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C44102C09 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 05:00:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [74.130.196.19] ([74.130.196.19:14441] helo=localhost) by cdptpa-oedge03 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.5.0.35861 r(Momo-dev:tip)) with ESMTP id 8E/9E-19454-0E854825; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 05:00:17 +0000 Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 05:00:16 +0000 Message-ID: <8E.9E.19454.0E854825@cdptpa-oedge03> From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org References: <044201cee0ee$c0bc0970$42341c50$@leadmon.net> Subject: Re: Updating from 9.2 to 10.0-BETA3 Issues.. X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.142:25 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 Cc: Howard Leadmon X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 05:00:25 -0000 > I figured I would setup a test system and get my feet wet with trying to > move from 9.2 to the current 10 that I know will be an official version > soon. So I took my 9.2 system, and as I use svn to update my sources, I > then replaced the /usr/src tree with the stable/10 branch, and went on to > build world, kernels, and through the recommended way to update to the new > branch. > This all for the most part went very well, I got 10 built, I did the > install, went to single user, updated all files, and rebooted and happy day > here I am running 10.0. The problem stated when I went back per the > documents, and ran the delete-old-libs, though the OS boots, now all kinda > stuff is broken! I thought no problem, let's rebuild the ports tree again, > as I didn't realize some of the stuff ended up in the newer package formats, > so had stuff that was missed. > Now trying to rebuild stuff like for example, mysql, I get errors like the > following: > ===> mysql56-client-5.6.14 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/cmake - found > ===> Configuring for mysql56-client-5.6.14 > ===> Performing in-source build > /bin/mkdir -p /usr/ports/databases/mysql56-client/work/mysql-5.6.14 > Shared object "libmd.so.5" not found, required by "cmake" > *** Error code 1 > Stop. > make: stopped in /usr/ports/databases/mysql56-client > [root@drazi /usr/ports/databases/mysql56-client]# > So I went back again, make sure I fully did a buildworld, and installed it, > thinking maybe some libs got wacked, but alas that didn't fix anything. > So the question is, if I am updating from 9.2 to 10.0 on a machine, how the > heck can I get all of the extra software to build, as I can't get really > much of anything to build at this point, be it mysql, or subversion, or any > of the add-on packages to make the server useful. Glad I tried this on a > test machine.. > Any ideas/suggestions on how to get this straight? --- > Howard Leadmon You are advised to rebuild all ports on a major version change such as 9.x to 10.x. "man portmaster" has a suggested method: Using portmaster to do a complete reinstallation of all your ports: 1. portmaster --list-origins > ~/installed-port-list 2. Update your ports tree 3. portmaster -ty --clean-distfiles 4. portmaster --check-port-dbdir 5. portmaster -Faf 6. pkg_delete -a 7. rm -rf /usr/local/lib/compat/pkg 8. Back up any files in /usr/local you wish to save, such as configuration files in /usr/local/etc 9. Manually check /usr/local and /var/db/pkg to make sure that they are really empty 10. Re-install portmaster 11. portmaster `cat ~/installed-port-list` You probably want to use the -D option for the installation and then run --clean-distfiles [-y] again when you are done. You might also want to consider using the --force-config option when installing the new ports. Alternatively you could use portmaster -a -f -D to do an ``in place'' update of your ports. If that process is interrupted for any reason you can use portmaster -a -f -D -R to avoid rebuilding ports already rebuilt on previous runs. However the first method (delete everything and rein- stall) is preferred. You will want to be sure to install ports-mgmt/pkg and ports-mgmt/portmaster at the start of rebuilding all ports. FreeBSD has switched from pkgtools to pkgng, on by default in FreeBSD 10.0, hence the need for ports-mgmt/pkg. Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 14 07:03:35 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 23189280 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 07:03:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA29621EC for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 07:03:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rAE73QDR034619 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 07:03:27 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk rAE73QDR034619 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1384412607; bh=WLNQASPtXQxU0TNHGS20xeJpoAaI4gvOlyVRVRGIHVQ=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; z=Date:=20Thu,=2014=20Nov=202013=2007:03:18=20+0000|From:=20Matthew =20Seaman=20|To:=20freebsd-questi ons@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20Updating=20from=209.2=20to=2010.0 -BETA3=20Issues..|References:=20<044201cee0ee$c0bc0970$42341c50$@l eadmon.net>|In-Reply-To:=20<044201cee0ee$c0bc0970$42341c50$@leadmo n.net>; b=Wo/1hYlQwM+jYnYaoJY4UG8OEo0/0KanFPxETtq+x1K0LyY7aa2ljaEJ2Fc/m1pvb C/tZuehtPffILMvOD/+umaxQIJ9uSXnwMaGmPOaiW0BAi/TI7E5l5Go6LL37oXZ3WB TqBn8Lsma24HHssJ+QNd5BihRwN7+I+eZABX7+9w= Message-ID: <528475B6.5010604@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 07:03:18 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating from 9.2 to 10.0-BETA3 Issues.. References: <044201cee0ee$c0bc0970$42341c50$@leadmon.net> In-Reply-To: <044201cee0ee$c0bc0970$42341c50$@leadmon.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 OpenPGP: id=E7F39EBF Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="AgCxktwd7iqLljEQ42rgagBGhgu8XNK4u" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.8 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 07:03:35 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --AgCxktwd7iqLljEQ42rgagBGhgu8XNK4u Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 14/11/2013 04:05, Howard Leadmon wrote: > So I went back again, make sure I fully did a buildworld, and installe= d it, > thinking maybe some libs got wacked, but alas that didn't fix anything.= >=20 > So the question is, if I am updating from 9.2 to 10.0 on a machine, ho= w the > heck can I get all of the extra software to build, as I can't get reall= y > much of anything to build at this point, be it mysql, or subversion, or= any > of the add-on packages to make the server useful. Glad I tried this o= n a > test machine.. >=20 > Any ideas/suggestions on how to get this straight? If you install misc/compat9x then all your 9.x compiled software should start working again. This however should only be considered a stop-gap to enable you to rebuild all your ports. As Howard mentioned, the default has changed from pkg_install to pkg(8) with 10.x, so you'll need to install ports-mgmt/pkg and run pkg2ng as part of this update. Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk --AgCxktwd7iqLljEQ42rgagBGhgu8XNK4u Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJShHW+XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATcAEP/10EFBb/iq4MNhswDbWa3AB6 HZJgpCU3iMF0arrdD/u+eVRxQjzroPiJQLo6Kpk9MyIJSui7gi7dMuyD8g7+vnQR viVDuH8/Aq3kFNY+CzdYpc4l9AWrjmMmCxP0lh0xArn2Q5ExX2O6nIzNagRvE8O3 nEKQnlz/MnwakWQOlbYSkP+645BGC315JIu5C5d0V9FgKE11gZh0lv4ApYZG27Tq uitLdN8SuVr7+R+hRoVf/2KRzu679b3StZ9+7SdubqBfFZkKo1wjBGgsKLv0B2NW ExiFq6p11R8TtjvV+rgnhcZ8GVs0ANlO01jwM+OTl0X8g+Ll5XttuiE823b49KWY CMe7SmdhMUeN7Z3747KlFL9C0bETEP0xObyOtTodVj3YWgUqL7SDZETK3RwBrnvg 5M0Jfk//soGXHZ5bUQQdrRgt+bCN+YPoRWl88BAl8RpLsJxmVQqxE0KOnj+gogEd DmT1XtQVZlMjy3EMQsNQf0J0vXTJf7Y/80qgGInRKIUjRHPtsliFVhcOtKu2nJto pW2TRPR8v4dRVurSa+SkjNaHW0yhnVG4aF4EFOt2M5xO2FWDb4zg/dzwflKXKXXv GuC2PtIwK36OMvuKJsVbo7jgENaVnxby5rhYKCTNSb9Ij9PYdPcTLWrS9L9mET9u b2mFqpT6R+LaZ24nvo2T =kLYY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --AgCxktwd7iqLljEQ42rgagBGhgu8XNK4u-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 14 07:29:24 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA93E915 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 07:29:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.leadmon.net (mail.leadmon.net [IPv6:2001:550:102:301::13]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 468462343 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 07:29:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from HDLDESKTOP (hdl-desktop.leadmon.net [10.0.0.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.leadmon.net (8.14.7/8.14.7/Blacklist) with ESMTP id rAE7TNaI053598 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 14 Nov 2013 02:29:23 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from howard@leadmon.net) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 mail.leadmon.net rAE7TNaI053598 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=leadmon.net; s=default; t=1384414163; bh=XUq7zEUMsFLLDdQaZm3atdocMBoqJ7P8UrlgSFnUyKU=; h=From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date; b=K398PRIG9+vOQNcdJLO1XPpVhWfvmqIIMpEYq8mCxt4y9scUXZjG0bjJ2eK6Nfl9N ZOEHb1y2OZ4QTwmDMVf8PFyz1YHUl2BhDv0XiJ9P/uMhFAxrbnZwk10n2M8aZ2HgsO TbeXtVX5zqIjH6aVy9UeBNGBJnJnW8UmETpie/aw= From: "Howard Leadmon" To: "'Matthew Seaman'" , References: <044201cee0ee$c0bc0970$42341c50$@leadmon.net> <528475B6.5010604@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <528475B6.5010604@infracaninophile.co.uk> Subject: RE: Updating from 9.2 to 10.0-BETA3 Issues.. Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 02:29:19 -0500 Message-ID: <046501cee10b$3d6da9d0$b848fd70$@leadmon.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQIdidwB4ZwUAIhG7RjNILAt7h4lIQGrC7rFmXmpPQA= Content-Language: en-us X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98 at vorlon.leadmon.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 07:29:24 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > > On 14/11/2013 04:05, Howard Leadmon wrote: > > So I went back again, make sure I fully did a buildworld, and installed it, > > thinking maybe some libs got wacked, but alas that didn't fix anything. > > > > So the question is, if I am updating from 9.2 to 10.0 on a machine, how the > > heck can I get all of the extra software to build, as I can't get really > > much of anything to build at this point, be it mysql, or subversion, or any > > of the add-on packages to make the server useful. Glad I tried this on a > > test machine.. > > > > Any ideas/suggestions on how to get this straight? > > If you install misc/compat9x then all your 9.x compiled software should > start working again. This however should only be considered a stop-gap > to enable you to rebuild all your ports. > > As Howard mentioned, the default has changed from pkg_install to pkg(8) > with 10.x, so you'll need to install ports-mgmt/pkg and run pkg2ng as > part of this update. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > -- > Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. > > PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey > JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk OK, adding in compat9x did allow it to build mysql, and hopefully the rest, time will tell. I guess the part that somewhat stumps me, is if I am just building a port fresh like mysql, why does it need the old compatibility libs to build it fresh. Does some of this stuff require gcc libs, or I am missing something in the process. On the package stuff, I did load the functions, as I found out the hard way that without running pkg2ng I ended up with all my ports missing. Also I saw Thomas's not about running portmaster, and I have always used portupgrade is that still ok under 10.x, or does it require portmaster to function? --- Howard Leadmon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 14 09:00:54 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5DA6148D for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 09:00:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0464A287E for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 09:00:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com ([178.78.126.226]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rAE90cjp036958 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 14 Nov 2013 09:00:45 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk rAE90cjp036958 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1384419645; bh=xGSgRRubsAHQz2LWtc3SNVCBRC8BBpUEUga3YFqzGic=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; z=Date:=20Thu,=2014=20Nov=202013=2009:00:28=20+0000|From:=20Matthew =20Seaman=20|To:=20Howard=20Leadm on=20,=20freebsd-questions@freebsd.org|Subject :=20Re:=20Updating=20from=209.2=20to=2010.0-BETA3=20Issues..|Refer ences:=20<044201cee0ee$c0bc0970$42341c50$@leadmon.net>=20<528475B6 .5010604@infracaninophile.co.uk>=20<046501cee10b$3d6da9d0$b848fd70 $@leadmon.net>|In-Reply-To:=20<046501cee10b$3d6da9d0$b848fd70$@lea dmon.net>; b=XH/BrCreiq8o8dFrcRtGsK1UWvf6J23z0NJ/DIFBx938OUXGbTJ7Ugue1uLgL3j13 QdpXGwqMmGioBY3C6d4qwfJoiCHS2fj+QwFN0LspS1LXyGWP2HGdsysoiFGZOg8ORh RYeTYvmsvuCAMtoAGTIMHO79Mb7BBIIiVSAdJ0Cs= X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host [178.78.126.226] claimed to be ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com Message-ID: <5284912C.4040203@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 09:00:28 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Howard Leadmon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating from 9.2 to 10.0-BETA3 Issues.. References: <044201cee0ee$c0bc0970$42341c50$@leadmon.net> <528475B6.5010604@infracaninophile.co.uk> <046501cee10b$3d6da9d0$b848fd70$@leadmon.net> In-Reply-To: <046501cee10b$3d6da9d0$b848fd70$@leadmon.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xacgbSgOK0e4lVoqDNRBTAqV3V2S5cusQ" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.97.8 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DCC_CHECK, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 09:00:54 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --xacgbSgOK0e4lVoqDNRBTAqV3V2S5cusQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11/14/13 07:29, Howard Leadmon wrote: > OK, adding in compat9x did allow it to build mysql, and hopefully the = rest, > time will tell. I guess the part that somewhat stumps me, is if I am = just > building a port fresh like mysql, why does it need the old compatibilit= y > libs to build it fresh. Does some of this stuff require gcc libs, or = I am > missing something in the process. =20 It seems you have build tools like cmake that link against 9.x libraries. Ideally you should rebuild your build tools before you rebuild the things use them to build. > On the package stuff, I did load he functions, as I found out the hard= way > that without running pkg2ng I ended up with all my ports missing. Al= so I > saw Thomas's not about running portmaster, and I have always used > portupgrade is that still ok under 10.x, or does it require portmaster = to > function? Both portmaster and portupgrade are compatible with pkg(8), and you can certainly carry on using them in pretty much the same way as you always did. There is a missing bit of functionality with portmaster in that it won't itself install from pkgs on a pkgngized system. Patches welcome! Cheers, Matthew --xacgbSgOK0e4lVoqDNRBTAqV3V2S5cusQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJShJE0XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQxOUYxNTRFQ0JGMTEyRTUwNTQ0RTNGMzAw MDUxM0YxMEUwQTlFNEU3AAoJEABRPxDgqeTnwfIP/2g4pIU+yIZzUe7xunJ82L9C ujrx8heVXIAGHRrUM8vZOcNkJDtV7GWb2tvwz7h+42Qtx5CSo01guzjrQTjT4K25 tXgKR7T2/gQqC86xVgqK2KJg9faxMqAOCVE7uz60orNN1dpvtLvH1WlMBK7pvEwY 6Tb2cyPDeKJfz8RMQEIbAtX5VvEpVXRkwBJQYyf5puC5LAo6bNJ5Iag0SMI99VVf IGUb8XNTbZSPRmCSmmp8ghTGvvZZTKzkSZXzFN0ROZuBi65BVWb2QBWUiTyVl9v7 ekSQFLOvtQscl8izhZZJV0GrZWzgBA0ONsCWWHgToUfgecmisQ4eTw7H/8MX9Ukn J6wFu1KtjXKtHBAMoD9peRmq7J1CTdtSrFgWoE09VWkQGMXkQQcmPCZl3ISr4fDH bbXACiAjThCVzTUKFqPHuqXRWJgNs18G8r0dFvaFEJh+0FyXqD9smGStVMTKpNCj Dp4iqCqjFTSQlqGdehZvwHtyO+FpajPEbtayxz84axO+aU5H21sFxCGXw5V+Iouo qiIqYtuInpLgRMjfUfopqe4uM/tkQdd7aVWPpX/5+EGQ34xPwENDED38ZnfyjIIt idqp7b1sEN5ZS2zh/eDcF732hFOf8KnAZAc13mxF26JhmrRJ+EIBRIaAqpvPjqn+ xsRyncs1PwJmzIIdwE2o =Pu1s -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xacgbSgOK0e4lVoqDNRBTAqV3V2S5cusQ-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 14 10:07:59 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E26CA43D for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:07:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lb0-x242.google.com (mail-lb0-x242.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::242]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 736432CC4 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:07:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lb0-f194.google.com with SMTP id y6so298966lbh.5 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 02:07:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=dZ+U6vmACKA+pKB0YDst/1/iwyocZvY1yHFwCqKEZMg=; b=OIGmX/FNp0LXO20AVgU5YWpECYScDUwXesh33xmsByqyAVTthPIxb/B+a82fMlcwW+ Po8i57D0Bno4tfF73q2CycI01gPjrTcEXQkjmuVj5ChMvszS/UTbkbbOg7aRTwqPExXT PDS5UOhtceYlM/WJk63A/zXUfGWS+maRNp6CYdA16u0GZ86L51HVa/n70aiguzCZFphi MleP6Z7yGRSrq8RPgr8Ygkd1LOvN0enfWvj6EAx6qg6oYpTsO5wKHSm+6I9y3457C1rR P0y391dqi4iFMDQRFoIxZyVYpra65No3CggSeCE+FE607Rd6f1sDJnTpwcup7Sh7e6nQ zOFQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.45.39 with SMTP id j7mr326396lam.15.1384423677416; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 02:07:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.175.193 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 02:07:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:37:57 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Request for Guest post From: Ramya Raju To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.16 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:08:00 -0000 Hi there, I=92m Ramya, a freelance writer/designer from India. I just came across you= r website and I=92m very impressed by it. The contents are very thoughtful an= d worth reading. Great work! I have a couple websites about English courses, that I=92m currently promoting for myself. I thought we could benefit each other somehow? If you are interested, I=92d be happy to write a very high-quality article for you= r site and get a couple permanent links from it? While your website is benefiting from my high-quality article, I=92m getting links from your site= , making this proposition mutually beneficial.What do you think about this, please? I do write on generic topics also .Shall I write about English courses or you=92ve other suggestions? Waiting for your response, and please do not hesitate to ask any questions. Thanks, Ramya Raju From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 14 11:28:06 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 388CD5D9 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 11:28:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.166.226]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05A7821FF for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 11:28:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [74.130.196.19] ([74.130.196.19:50578] helo=localhost) by cdptpa-oedge01 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.5.0.35861 r(Momo-dev:tip)) with ESMTP id 62/0E-02506-E30B4825; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 11:13:02 +0000 Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 11:13:02 +0000 Message-ID: <62.0E.02506.E30B4825@cdptpa-oedge01> From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Source tree and ports tree on Linux file system? X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.118:25 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 11:28:06 -0000 Can FreeBSD build from source with source tree on Linux ext2fs partition, and subsequently compile ports from such partition, using USB-stick installation of FreeBSD 9.x? That would be useful if FreeBSD Ethernet driver doesn't work. This is mainly a matter of curiosity, since I used a NetBSD-current amd64 installation, where the Ethernet driver worked, with subversion built from pkgsrc. In this latter case, file system was ffsv2 aka UFS2. Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 14 12:20:49 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72149127 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 12:20:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pb0-x248.google.com (mail-pb0-x248.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::248]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5233C2662 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 12:20:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f72.google.com with SMTP id jt11so1241196pbb.3 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 04:20:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:message-id:date:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=vEewbmrhNHUdzU+prwNv9lMSDreBX68cgnOLPb1M5Ic=; b=i4KcZ/H098AAzf+357AgNOdJiwj6SFlf70FUtSoDGpBNHB/cEraDlS5+0bL2Col/x2 CiI/9sgTRSlCItagQ15SvavCsn+60Kcjbuip64Lgd+S804vbb4ya6HqLaanWNamR8XS5 ZfO0ChrTAz22vSIttvs0rqrFeMwhuGbXlBVbHNNbQH02IZxIMG+nj5kjaX8Lp5UhbLLc Ew6ki8wMtPICJkNQed+NpE1R7bg395iA74dSeCtD0FEf4wAx2ATDdH7Zi+RRjZG9NUJf +bNa8HcmBE4Eq5FmQDhlgLuqYvBK7lnzuBLCrnm4oSay/h/yBoD8syXvLHITV25cFdo4 hBWQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.66.163 with SMTP id g3mr438343pat.3.1384431648586; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 04:20:48 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <001a1134a134a144aa04eb221c44@google.com> Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 12:20:48 +0000 Subject: Gain Organic Traffic: Freebsd.Org :PS From: Masha Lockwood To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.16 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 12:20:49 -0000 PGRpdiBkaXI9Imx0ciI+PHNwYW4gIA0Kc3R5bGU9ImNvbG9yOnJnYigzNCwzNCwzNCk7Zm9udC1z aXplOnNtYWxsO2ZvbnQtc3R5bGU6bm9ybWFsO2ZvbnQtdmFyaWFudDpub3JtYWw7Zm9udC13ZWln aHQ6bm9ybWFsO2xldHRlci1zcGFjaW5nOm5vcm1hbDtsaW5lLWhlaWdodDpub3JtYWw7dGV4dC1h bGlnbjpzdGFydDt0ZXh0LWluZGVudDowcHg7dGV4dC10cmFuc2Zvcm06bm9uZTt3aGl0ZS1zcGFj ZTpub3JtYWw7d29yZC1zcGFjaW5nOjBweDtmb250LWZhbWlseTp2ZXJkYW5hLHNhbnMtc2VyaWYi PkRlYXIgIA0KRnJlZWJzZC5PcmcgVGVhbSw8YnI+DQoNCjxicj5JIHRob3VnaHQgeW91IG1pZ2h0 IGxpa2UgdG8ga25vdyBzb21lIG9mIHRoZSByZWFzb25zIHdoeSB5b3UgYXJlIG5vdCAgDQpnZXR0 aW5nIGVub3VnaCBPcmdhbmljIHNlYXJjaCBhbmQgZW5naW5lIFNvY2lhbCBNZWRpYSB0cmFmZmlj ICANCmZvcqBGcmVlYnNkLk9yZzxiPi48L2I+PC9zcGFuPjxwICANCnN0eWxlPSJjb2xvcjpyZ2Io MzQsMzQsMzQpO2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OmFyaWFsO2ZvbnQtc2l6ZTpzbWFsbDtmb250LXN0eWxlOm5v cm1hbDtmb250LXZhcmlhbnQ6bm9ybWFsO2ZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0Om5vcm1hbDtsZXR0ZXItc3BhY2lu Zzpub3JtYWw7bGluZS1oZWlnaHQ6bm9ybWFsO3RleHQtYWxpZ246c3RhcnQ7dGV4dC1pbmRlbnQ6 MHB4O3RleHQtdHJhbnNmb3JtOm5vbmU7d2hpdGUtc3BhY2U6bm9ybWFsO3dvcmQtc3BhY2luZzow cHg7bWFyZ2luLWxlZnQ6MC41aW4iPg0KDQo8c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6dmVyZGFu YSxzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj4xLqCgoKBZb3VyIHdlYnNpdGUgRnJlZWJzZC5PcmcgIA0KaXMgbm90IHJh bmtpbmcgdG9wIGluIEdvb2dsZSBvcmdhbmljIHNlYXJjaCBmb3IgbWFueSBjb21wZXRpdGl2ZSAg DQprZXl3b3Jkcy48L3NwYW4+PC9wPjxzcGFuICANCnN0eWxlPSJjb2xvcjpyZ2IoMzQsMzQsMzQp O2ZvbnQtc2l6ZTpzbWFsbDtmb250LXN0eWxlOm5vcm1hbDtmb250LXZhcmlhbnQ6bm9ybWFsO2Zv bnQtd2VpZ2h0Om5vcm1hbDtsZXR0ZXItc3BhY2luZzpub3JtYWw7bGluZS1oZWlnaHQ6bm9ybWFs O3RleHQtYWxpZ246c3RhcnQ7dGV4dC1pbmRlbnQ6MHB4O3RleHQtdHJhbnNmb3JtOm5vbmU7d2hp dGUtc3BhY2U6bm9ybWFsO3dvcmQtc3BhY2luZzowcHg7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6dmVyZGFuYSxzYW5z LXNlcmlmIj48L3NwYW4+PHAgIA0Kc3R5bGU9ImNvbG9yOnJnYigzNCwzNCwzNCk7Zm9udC1mYW1p bHk6YXJpYWw7Zm9udC1zaXplOnNtYWxsO2ZvbnQtc3R5bGU6bm9ybWFsO2ZvbnQtdmFyaWFudDpu b3JtYWw7Zm9udC13ZWlnaHQ6bm9ybWFsO2xldHRlci1zcGFjaW5nOm5vcm1hbDtsaW5lLWhlaWdo dDpub3JtYWw7dGV4dC1hbGlnbjpzdGFydDt0ZXh0LWluZGVudDowcHg7dGV4dC10cmFuc2Zvcm06 bm9uZTt3aGl0ZS1zcGFjZTpub3JtYWw7d29yZC1zcGFjaW5nOjBweDttYXJnaW4tbGVmdDowLjVp biI+DQoNCjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LWZhbWlseTp2ZXJkYW5hLHNhbnMtc2VyaWYiPjIuoKCg oFlvdXIgd2Vic2l0ZSBwcm9maWxlICANCm5lZWRzIHRvIGhhdmUgcmVndWxhciB1cGRhdGUgaW4g bWFqb3IgU29jaWFsIE1lZGlhIHNpdGVzLjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+PHNwYW4gIA0Kc3R5bGU9ImNvbG9y OnJnYigzNCwzNCwzNCk7Zm9udC1zaXplOnNtYWxsO2ZvbnQtc3R5bGU6bm9ybWFsO2ZvbnQtdmFy aWFudDpub3JtYWw7Zm9udC13ZWlnaHQ6bm9ybWFsO2xldHRlci1zcGFjaW5nOm5vcm1hbDtsaW5l LWhlaWdodDpub3JtYWw7dGV4dC1hbGlnbjpzdGFydDt0ZXh0LWluZGVudDowcHg7dGV4dC10cmFu c2Zvcm06bm9uZTt3aGl0ZS1zcGFjZTpub3JtYWw7d29yZC1zcGFjaW5nOjBweDtmb250LWZhbWls eTp2ZXJkYW5hLHNhbnMtc2VyaWYiPjwvc3Bhbj48cCAgDQpzdHlsZT0iY29sb3I6cmdiKDM0LDM0 LDM0KTtmb250LWZhbWlseTphcmlhbDtmb250LXNpemU6c21hbGw7Zm9udC1zdHlsZTpub3JtYWw7 Zm9udC12YXJpYW50Om5vcm1hbDtmb250LXdlaWdodDpub3JtYWw7bGV0dGVyLXNwYWNpbmc6bm9y bWFsO2xpbmUtaGVpZ2h0Om5vcm1hbDt0ZXh0LWFsaWduOnN0YXJ0O3RleHQtaW5kZW50OjBweDt0 ZXh0LXRyYW5zZm9ybTpub25lO3doaXRlLXNwYWNlOm5vcm1hbDt3b3JkLXNwYWNpbmc6MHB4O21h cmdpbi1sZWZ0OjAuNWluIj4NCg0KPHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OnZlcmRhbmEsc2Fu cy1zZXJpZiI+My6goKCgWW91ciBzaXRlIGhhcyBsZXNzICANCm51bWJlciBvZiBHb29nbGUgJmFt cDsgWWFob28gYmFjayBsaW5rcywgdGhpcyBjYW4gYmUgaW1wcm92ZWQgIA0KZnVydGhlci48L3Nw YW4+PC9wPjxzcGFuICANCnN0eWxlPSJjb2xvcjpyZ2IoMzQsMzQsMzQpO2ZvbnQtc2l6ZTpzbWFs bDtmb250LXN0eWxlOm5vcm1hbDtmb250LXZhcmlhbnQ6bm9ybWFsO2ZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0Om5vcm1h bDtsZXR0ZXItc3BhY2luZzpub3JtYWw7bGluZS1oZWlnaHQ6bm9ybWFsO3RleHQtYWxpZ246c3Rh cnQ7dGV4dC1pbmRlbnQ6MHB4O3RleHQtdHJhbnNmb3JtOm5vbmU7d2hpdGUtc3BhY2U6bm9ybWFs O3dvcmQtc3BhY2luZzowcHg7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6dmVyZGFuYSxzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj48L3NwYW4+ PHAgIA0Kc3R5bGU9ImNvbG9yOnJnYigzNCwzNCwzNCk7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6YXJpYWw7Zm9udC1z aXplOnNtYWxsO2ZvbnQtc3R5bGU6bm9ybWFsO2ZvbnQtdmFyaWFudDpub3JtYWw7Zm9udC13ZWln aHQ6bm9ybWFsO2xldHRlci1zcGFjaW5nOm5vcm1hbDtsaW5lLWhlaWdodDpub3JtYWw7dGV4dC1h bGlnbjpzdGFydDt0ZXh0LWluZGVudDowcHg7dGV4dC10cmFuc2Zvcm06bm9uZTt3aGl0ZS1zcGFj ZTpub3JtYWw7d29yZC1zcGFjaW5nOjBweCI+DQoNCjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LWZhbWlseTp2 ZXJkYW5hLHNhbnMtc2VyaWYiPlRoZXJlIGFyZSBtYW55IGFkZGl0aW9uYWwgIA0KaW1wcm92ZW1l bnRzIHRoYXQgY291bGQgYmUgbWFkZSB0byB5b3VyIHdlYnNpdGUsIGFuZCBpZiB5b3Ugd291bGQg bGlrZSB0byAgDQpsZWFybiBhYm91dCB0aGVtLCBhbmQgYXJlIGN1cmlvdXMgdG8ga25vdyB3aGF0 IG91ciB3b3JraW5nIHRvZ2V0aGVyIHdvdWxkICANCmludm9sdmUsIHRoZW4gSSB3b3VsZCBiZSBn bGFkIHRvIHByb3ZpZGUgeW91IHdpdGggYSBkZXRhaWxlZCBhbmFseXNpcyBpbiAgDQp0aGUgZm9y bSBvZiBhoDxiPldFQlNJVEUgQVVESVQgUkVQT1JUIGZvciBGUkVFPC9iPi48L3NwYW4+PC9wPg0K DQo8c3BhbiAgDQpzdHlsZT0iY29sb3I6cmdiKDM0LDM0LDM0KTtmb250LXNpemU6c21hbGw7Zm9u dC1zdHlsZTpub3JtYWw7Zm9udC12YXJpYW50Om5vcm1hbDtmb250LXdlaWdodDpub3JtYWw7bGV0 dGVyLXNwYWNpbmc6bm9ybWFsO2xpbmUtaGVpZ2h0Om5vcm1hbDt0ZXh0LWFsaWduOnN0YXJ0O3Rl eHQtaW5kZW50OjBweDt0ZXh0LXRyYW5zZm9ybTpub25lO3doaXRlLXNwYWNlOm5vcm1hbDt3b3Jk LXNwYWNpbmc6MHB4O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OnZlcmRhbmEsc2Fucy1zZXJpZiI+PC9zcGFuPjxwICAN CnN0eWxlPSJjb2xvcjpyZ2IoMzQsMzQsMzQpO2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OmFyaWFsO2ZvbnQtc2l6ZTpz bWFsbDtmb250LXN0eWxlOm5vcm1hbDtmb250LXZhcmlhbnQ6bm9ybWFsO2ZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0Om5v cm1hbDtsZXR0ZXItc3BhY2luZzpub3JtYWw7bGluZS1oZWlnaHQ6bm9ybWFsO3RleHQtYWxpZ246 c3RhcnQ7dGV4dC1pbmRlbnQ6MHB4O3RleHQtdHJhbnNmb3JtOm5vbmU7d2hpdGUtc3BhY2U6bm9y bWFsO3dvcmQtc3BhY2luZzowcHgiPg0KDQo8c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6dmVyZGFu YSxzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj5PdXIgY2xpZW50cyBjb25zaXN0ZW50bHkgdGVsbCAgDQp1cyB0aGF0IHRo ZWlyIGN1c3RvbWVycyBmaW5kIHRoZW0gYmVjYXVzZSB0aGV5IGFyZSBhdCB0aGUgdG9wIG9mIHRo ZSBHb29nbGUgIA0Kc2VhcmNoIHJhbmtpbmdzLiBCZWluZyBhdCB0aGUgdG9wIGxlZnQgb2YgR29v Z2xlICgjMS0gIzMgb3JnYW5pYyBwb3NpdGlvbnMpICANCmlzIHRoZSBiZXN0IHRoaW5nIHlvdSBj YW4gZG8gZm9yIHlvdXIgY29tcGFueSYjMzk7cyB3ZWJzaXRlIHRyYWZmaWMgYW5kICANCm9ubGlu ZSByZXB1dGF0aW9uLjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+DQoNCjxzcGFuICANCnN0eWxlPSJjb2xvcjpyZ2IoMzQs MzQsMzQpO2ZvbnQtc2l6ZTpzbWFsbDtmb250LXN0eWxlOm5vcm1hbDtmb250LXZhcmlhbnQ6bm9y bWFsO2ZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0Om5vcm1hbDtsZXR0ZXItc3BhY2luZzpub3JtYWw7bGluZS1oZWlnaHQ6 bm9ybWFsO3RleHQtYWxpZ246c3RhcnQ7dGV4dC1pbmRlbnQ6MHB4O3RleHQtdHJhbnNmb3JtOm5v bmU7d2hpdGUtc3BhY2U6bm9ybWFsO3dvcmQtc3BhY2luZzowcHg7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6dmVyZGFu YSxzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj48L3NwYW4+PHAgIA0Kc3R5bGU9ImNvbG9yOnJnYigzNCwzNCwzNCk7Zm9u dC1mYW1pbHk6YXJpYWw7Zm9udC1zaXplOnNtYWxsO2ZvbnQtc3R5bGU6bm9ybWFsO2ZvbnQtdmFy aWFudDpub3JtYWw7Zm9udC13ZWlnaHQ6bm9ybWFsO2xldHRlci1zcGFjaW5nOm5vcm1hbDtsaW5l LWhlaWdodDpub3JtYWw7dGV4dC1hbGlnbjpzdGFydDt0ZXh0LWluZGVudDowcHg7dGV4dC10cmFu c2Zvcm06bm9uZTt3aGl0ZS1zcGFjZTpub3JtYWw7d29yZC1zcGFjaW5nOjBweCI+DQoNCjxzcGFu IHN0eWxlPSJmb250LWZhbWlseTp2ZXJkYW5hLHNhbnMtc2VyaWYiPk91ciBwYWNrYWdlcyBhcmUg ZGVzaWduZWQgZm9yICANCmEgY29tcGxldGUgYWR2YW5jZSBTRU8gZXhwZXJpZW5jZSB3aGljaCBp bmNsdWRlcyBTTU8sIEJyYW5kIG1hbmFnZW1lbnQsICANClJlcHV0YXRpb24gbWFuYWdlbWVudCwg U0VPIGV0Yy4gaW4gb3JkZXIgdG8gYmVhdCB5b3VyICANCmNvbXBldGl0b3JzLjwvc3Bhbj48L3A+ DQoNCjxzcGFuICANCnN0eWxlPSJjb2xvcjpyZ2IoMzQsMzQsMzQpO2ZvbnQtc2l6ZTpzbWFsbDtm b250LXN0eWxlOm5vcm1hbDtmb250LXZhcmlhbnQ6bm9ybWFsO2ZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0Om5vcm1hbDts ZXR0ZXItc3BhY2luZzpub3JtYWw7bGluZS1oZWlnaHQ6bm9ybWFsO3RleHQtYWxpZ246c3RhcnQ7 dGV4dC1pbmRlbnQ6MHB4O3RleHQtdHJhbnNmb3JtOm5vbmU7d2hpdGUtc3BhY2U6bm9ybWFsO3dv cmQtc3BhY2luZzowcHg7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6dmVyZGFuYSxzYW5zLXNlcmlmIj48L3NwYW4+PHAg IA0Kc3R5bGU9ImNvbG9yOnJnYigzNCwzNCwzNCk7Zm9udC1mYW1pbHk6YXJpYWw7Zm9udC1zaXpl OnNtYWxsO2ZvbnQtc3R5bGU6bm9ybWFsO2ZvbnQtdmFyaWFudDpub3JtYWw7Zm9udC13ZWlnaHQ6 bm9ybWFsO2xldHRlci1zcGFjaW5nOm5vcm1hbDtsaW5lLWhlaWdodDpub3JtYWw7dGV4dC1hbGln bjpzdGFydDt0ZXh0LWluZGVudDowcHg7dGV4dC10cmFuc2Zvcm06bm9uZTt3aGl0ZS1zcGFjZTpu b3JtYWw7d29yZC1zcGFjaW5nOjBweCI+DQoNCjxzcGFuIHN0eWxlPSJmb250LWZhbWlseTp2ZXJk YW5hLHNhbnMtc2VyaWYiPlNvdW5kcyBpbnRlcmVzdGluZz8gRmVlbCBmcmVlICANCnRvIGVtYWls IHVzIG9yIGFsdGVybmF0aXZlbHkgeW91IGNhbiBwcm92aWRlIG1lIHdpdGggeW91ciBwaG9uZSBu dW1iZXIgYW5kICANCnRoZSBiZXN0IHRpbWUgdG8gY2FsbCB5b3UuPC9zcGFuPjwvcD48c3BhbiAg DQpzdHlsZT0iY29sb3I6cmdiKDM0LDM0LDM0KTtmb250LXNpemU6c21hbGw7Zm9udC1zdHlsZTpu b3JtYWw7Zm9udC12YXJpYW50Om5vcm1hbDtmb250LXdlaWdodDpub3JtYWw7bGV0dGVyLXNwYWNp bmc6bm9ybWFsO2xpbmUtaGVpZ2h0Om5vcm1hbDt0ZXh0LWFsaWduOnN0YXJ0O3RleHQtaW5kZW50 OjBweDt0ZXh0LXRyYW5zZm9ybTpub25lO3doaXRlLXNwYWNlOm5vcm1hbDt3b3JkLXNwYWNpbmc6 MHB4O2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OnZlcmRhbmEsc2Fucy1zZXJpZiI+PC9zcGFuPjxwICANCnN0eWxlPSJj b2xvcjpyZ2IoMzQsMzQsMzQpO2ZvbnQtZmFtaWx5OmFyaWFsO2ZvbnQtc2l6ZTpzbWFsbDtmb250 LXN0eWxlOm5vcm1hbDtmb250LXZhcmlhbnQ6bm9ybWFsO2ZvbnQtd2VpZ2h0Om5vcm1hbDtsZXR0 ZXItc3BhY2luZzpub3JtYWw7bGluZS1oZWlnaHQ6bm9ybWFsO3RleHQtYWxpZ246c3RhcnQ7dGV4 dC1pbmRlbnQ6MHB4O3RleHQtdHJhbnNmb3JtOm5vbmU7d2hpdGUtc3BhY2U6bm9ybWFsO3dvcmQt c3BhY2luZzowcHgiPg0KDQo8c3BhbiBzdHlsZT0iZm9udC1mYW1pbHk6dmVyZGFuYSxzYW5zLXNl cmlmIj48c3BhbiAgDQpzdHlsZT0ibGluZS1oZWlnaHQ6MTRweCI+LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tPFdCUj4tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLTxicj48L3NwYW4+PHNwYW4gIA0K c3R5bGU9ImxpbmUtaGVpZ2h0OjE0cHgiIGxhbmc9IkVOLUlOIj5CZXN0IFJlZ2FyZHMsoDxicj5N YXNoYSBMb2Nrd29vZCB8U0VPICANCkNvbnN1bHRhbnQ8YnI+DQoNClBILiBObzqgNjMxLTI5Mi00 MDkwPGJyPkFVUzogIA0KKzYxLTM5MDEzLTYwOTA8YnI+U2t5cGU6oHNlby5vbmxpbmVidXNpbmVz czwvc3Bhbj48c3BhbiAgDQpzdHlsZT0ibGluZS1oZWlnaHQ6MTRweCI+PGJyPi0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLTxXQlI+LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS08L3NwYW4+PC9zcGFu PjwvcD48cCAgDQpzdHlsZT0iY29sb3I6cmdiKDM0LDM0LDM0KTtmb250LWZhbWlseTphcmlhbDtm b250LXNpemU6c21hbGw7Zm9udC1zdHlsZTpub3JtYWw7Zm9udC12YXJpYW50Om5vcm1hbDtmb250 LXdlaWdodDpub3JtYWw7bGV0dGVyLXNwYWNpbmc6bm9ybWFsO2xpbmUtaGVpZ2h0Om5vcm1hbDt0 ZXh0LWFsaWduOnN0YXJ0O3RleHQtaW5kZW50OjBweDt0ZXh0LXRyYW5zZm9ybTpub25lO3doaXRl LXNwYWNlOm5vcm1hbDt3b3JkLXNwYWNpbmc6MHB4Ij4NCg0KPHNwYW4gc3R5bGU9ImZvbnQtZmFt aWx5OnZlcmRhbmEsc2Fucy1zZXJpZiI+PHNwYW4gIA0Kc3R5bGU9ImxpbmUtaGVpZ2h0OjE0cHgi PjxiPlBTMTwvYj46IFRoaXMgaXMgb25ldGltZSBlbWFpbCBhbmQgeW91IG1heSBhc2sgIA0KdXMg dG8gk1JFTU9WRZQgeW91IGZyb20gb3VyIG1haWxpbmcgbGlzdC6gPGJyPjxiPlBTMjwvYj46IFdl IG9wZXJhdGUgMjQgeDcuICANCkkgd2lsbCBiZSBoYXBweSB0byBzZW5kIHlvdSBsaW5rcyB0byBw cmljZSBsaXN0LCBtb25leSBiYWNrIGd1YXJhbnRlZSwgIA0KY2xpZW50IHJhbmtpbmdzLCBjbGll bnQgdGVzdGltb25pYWxzLCCTSG93IHdlIGFyZSBkaWZmZXJlbnQgZnJvbSBvdGhlcnM/lCwgIA0K YW5kIJNXaHkgc2hvdWxkIHlvdSBjaG9vc2UgdXM/lCBvbiByZWNlaXZpbmcgYSByZXNwb25zZSBm cm9tICANCnlvdS48L3NwYW4+PC9zcGFuPjwvcD4NCg0KPC9kaXY+DQo= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 14 14:19:45 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E59C1A55 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:19:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC4572E81 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:19:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-117-74.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.117.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A14F27743; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:19:38 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id rAEEJQWs002018; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:19:26 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:19:26 +0100 From: Polytropon To: "Thomas Mueller" Subject: Re: Updating from 9.2 to 10.0-BETA3 Issues.. Message-Id: <20131114151926.1113010f.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <8E.9E.19454.0E854825@cdptpa-oedge03> References: <044201cee0ee$c0bc0970$42341c50$@leadmon.net> <8E.9E.19454.0E854825@cdptpa-oedge03> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Howard Leadmon , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:19:46 -0000 On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 05:00:16 +0000, Thomas Mueller wrote: > You are advised to rebuild all ports on a major version change > such as 9.x to 10.x. Or if you can't or intendedly refuse, use the compat9x port. But be careful when starting to install new programs: Mixing old and new ones can get really terrible, so the suggestion of re-installing all ports is probably the better one. > You will want to be sure to install ports-mgmt/pkg and > ports-mgmt/portmaster at the start of rebuilding all ports. > > FreeBSD has switched from pkgtools to pkgng, on by default > in FreeBSD 10.0, hence the need for ports-mgmt/pkg. In that case, if I may ask, why didn't pkg become part of the OS then if it's the system's package management system? Such as the old pkg_* tools were part of the OS distribution, why does 10.0 still require additional software to get "matters of the OS" running? The same question can be asked about the transition from CVS to SVN, where CVS:SVN == csup:? ... :-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 14 14:25:35 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 70F8D15A for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:25:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx02.qsc.de (mx02.qsc.de [213.148.130.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38EF62F1B for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:25:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-117-74.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.117.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx02.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8CC0277FA; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:25:33 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id rAEEPLaK002038; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:25:21 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:25:21 +0100 From: Polytropon To: "Thomas Mueller" Subject: Re: Source tree and ports tree on Linux file system? Message-Id: <20131114152521.3bdf5d75.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <62.0E.02506.E30B4825@cdptpa-oedge01> References: <62.0E.02506.E30B4825@cdptpa-oedge01> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:25:35 -0000 On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 11:13:02 +0000, Thomas Mueller wrote: > Can FreeBSD build from source with source tree on Linux ext2fs > partition, and subsequently compile ports from such partition, > using USB-stick installation of FreeBSD 9.x? > > That would be useful if FreeBSD Ethernet driver doesn't work. > > This is mainly a matter of curiosity, since I used a NetBSD-current > amd64 installation, where the Ethernet driver worked, with > subversion built from pkgsrc. > > In this latter case, file system was ffsv2 aka UFS2. I think the /usr/src and /usr/ports tree can be "read only" when they are "sourced" for building purposes. It's just important where /usr/obj and the working directories for stuff from /usr/ports are mapped to. If you have more than enough RAM, you can make a memory disk and locate them there. Otherwise, using a UFS partition (wherever it is actually located) sounds better. The ports collection allows setting a "working directory prefix" to move the creation of files out of /usr/ports. Pay attention to also deal with /usr/ports/distfiles (where the source archives are stored) and /usr/ports/packages (if you're going to build packages). -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 14 14:29:53 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8FB49353 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:29:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.leadmon.net (mail.leadmon.net [IPv6:2001:550:102:301::13]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E73C2F66 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:29:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from HDLDESKTOP (hdl-desktop.leadmon.net [10.0.0.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.leadmon.net (8.14.7/8.14.7/Blacklist) with ESMTP id rAEETpiI069260 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 14 Nov 2013 09:29:52 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from howard@leadmon.net) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 mail.leadmon.net rAEETpiI069260 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=leadmon.net; s=default; t=1384439392; bh=wuDyyoAd1RKU2j0rtxC9PxbM/niYTb5moxJfZDpBshQ=; h=From:To:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date; b=cpITIxzhwLufyNCbqnf4T5GMsIVdb0pS0ylYbRpkQKnOB+QMzgkm7K9+P++aZJNdN bAEoVVySFtSEPCuyvaiDnd0oio6snWYkjPPM2EkoKrYG4B1e4TjUVgP1FYt1uZ1bn4 90D+3bPSHg+KH+lzU7831zUSfj0kRf5Dr+irWs74= From: "Howard Leadmon" To: "'Matthew Seaman'" , References: <044201cee0ee$c0bc0970$42341c50$@leadmon.net> <528475B6.5010604@infracaninophile.co.uk> <046501cee10b$3d6da9d0$b848fd70$@leadmon.net> <5284912C.4040203@infracaninophile.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <5284912C.4040203@infracaninophile.co.uk> Subject: RE: Updating from 9.2 to 10.0-BETA3 Issues.. Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 09:29:48 -0500 Message-ID: <047401cee145$fafde7a0$f0f9b6e0$@leadmon.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQIdidwB4ZwUAIhG7RjNILAt7h4lIQGrC7rFAdCQDoICLUxXGJlaL4Cg Content-Language: en-us X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98 at vorlon.leadmon.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 14:29:53 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > > On 11/14/13 07:29, Howard Leadmon wrote: > > OK, adding in compat9x did allow it to build mysql, and hopefully the rest, > > time will tell. I guess the part that somewhat stumps me, is if I am just > > building a port fresh like mysql, why does it need the old compatibility > > libs to build it fresh. Does some of this stuff require gcc libs, or I am > > missing something in the process. > > It seems you have build tools like cmake that link against 9.x > libraries. Ideally you should rebuild your build tools before you > rebuild the things use them to build. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > What is needed to rebuild the tools? Maybe I missed that someplace, and could use a quick hit with a cloo bat. I did another complete build of world, installed everything, even make sure pkg was seeing my ports, and then proceeded to rebuild subversion on the machine out of ports. Sure enough, when it was rebuilt and installed, I see it's still using the 9.x libs, and I would have thought it would have moved to using the 10.x libs, so I must be missing something on this side.. --- Howard Leadmon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 14 15:10:06 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73CBB4CE; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:10:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E1692306; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:10:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 2ACBF33C25; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:10:05 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating from 9.2 to 10.0-BETA3 Issues.. References: <044201cee0ee$c0bc0970$42341c50$@leadmon.net> <8E.9E.19454.0E854825@cdptpa-oedge03> <20131114151926.1113010f.freebsd@edvax.de> Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:10:05 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20131114151926.1113010f.freebsd@edvax.de> (Polytropon's message of "Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:19:26 +0100") Message-ID: <444n7fxbn6.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:10:06 -0000 Polytropon writes: > On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 05:00:16 +0000, Thomas Mueller wrote: >> You are advised to rebuild all ports on a major version change >> such as 9.x to 10.x. > > Or if you can't or intendedly refuse, use the compat9x port. > But be careful when starting to install new programs: Mixing > old and new ones can get really terrible, so the suggestion > of re-installing all ports is probably the better one. The intended use case is actually a combination of the two. That is, you use the compatibility shims *while* you're rebuilding all of your ports. If your rebuild tool gets the dependency tree correct, then you will almost certainly have all of the ports working through the whole ports-upgrade procedure. Once all of your ports have been updated, you can (of course) then remove the compatbility shims. >> You will want to be sure to install ports-mgmt/pkg and >> ports-mgmt/portmaster at the start of rebuilding all ports. >> >> FreeBSD has switched from pkgtools to pkgng, on by default >> in FreeBSD 10.0, hence the need for ports-mgmt/pkg. > > In that case, if I may ask, why didn't pkg become part of > the OS then if it's the system's package management system? Because it's more tightly tied to the ports tree than it is to anything in the base system. By putting it in ports, new features can be added without waiting for the next release. If it were in the base system, the ports tree would have to remain backward-compatible with the version of pkg included in every version of FreeBSD, right up until its end-of-life. > Such as the old pkg_* tools were part of the OS distribution, > why does 10.0 still require additional software to get "matters > of the OS" running? The same question can be asked about the > transition from CVS to SVN, where CVS:SVN == csup:? ... :-) I don't think your definition of "matters of the OS" is precise enough to argue over directly. I suspect there are more opinions on the topic than there are people who've thought about it. As far as a csup replacement per se, most of its users are better served by freebsd-update than by svnup, so it's not really equivalent. pkg(8) is a special case; there is a version in the base system to bootstrap the support appropriate to whatever version of the ports tree is present. We've wandered far enough afield that I'm redirecting the discussion to -chat. Be well. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 14 15:13:17 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 816846B9 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:13:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lena.kiev.ua (lena.kiev.ua [82.146.52.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22BC42369 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:13:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lena.kiev.ua; s=3; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=oQqGUnFnJ668SJE2y9jugmQ4flQGTFJBx6nTkO7YSWM=; b=EwnS2eMi+PLwB58413/WqkO5oO7e7ta77oFpljYtPcdat0Ehq8BpNTNSNZ/A4lnptdUrGGJeYvMN3oBvNmn7QK5Sm1aVk7aNMZZM2ojPpjE9vlmT7h39XdcG/p/giiX0BPoznnhehNr63kR8rZl5FRj42GGmqDH4IX4yyk01z90=; Received: from ip-384c.rusanovka-net.kiev.ua ([94.244.56.76] helo=bedside.lena.kiev.ua) by lena.kiev.ua with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1VgyM4-000HNY-Kc; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 16:57:13 +0200 Received: from bedside.lena.kiev.ua (localhost.lena.kiev.ua [127.0.0.1]) by bedside.lena.kiev.ua (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rAEEuuF4020762; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 16:56:56 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from Lena@lena.kiev.ua) Received: (from lena@localhost) by bedside.lena.kiev.ua (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id rAEEuuEN020761; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 16:56:56 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from Lena@lena.kiev.ua) Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 16:56:56 +0200 From: Lena@lena.kiev.ua To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: unbound and ntp in FreeBSD 10 Beta 3 Message-ID: <20131114145656.GL786@lena.kiev> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20131113144937.089e8a2a@gumby.homeunix.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Gerard Seibert X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:13:17 -0000 > From: RW > This looks like the cause of the problem: > > $ rcorder /etc/rc.d/* | grep -E "ntp|unbound" > /etc/rc.d/ntpdate > /etc/rc.d/ntpd > /etc/rc.d/local_unbound > Alternately you might try adding an extra rc file with: > > # PROVIDE: ORDERUNBOUND > # REQUIRE: ntpd ntpdate > # BEFORE: local_unbound /etc/rc.d/ntpdate contains: # REQUIRE: NETWORKING syslogd named I think that "unbound local_unbound" should be included into this line. I use unbound as local recursive resolver in 8.4-RELEASE. I added that, and "sleep 1" before "${ntpdate_program:-ntpdate} $rc_flags $ntpdate_hosts". From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 14 15:19:58 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 247AED7E for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:19:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2D1B23CD for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:19:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 3FF4033C25; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:19:57 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: "Howard Leadmon" Subject: Re: Updating from 9.2 to 10.0-BETA3 Issues.. References: <044201cee0ee$c0bc0970$42341c50$@leadmon.net> <528475B6.5010604@infracaninophile.co.uk> <046501cee10b$3d6da9d0$b848fd70$@leadmon.net> <5284912C.4040203@infracaninophile.co.uk> <047401cee145$fafde7a0$f0f9b6e0$@leadmon.net> Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:19:57 -0500 In-Reply-To: <047401cee145$fafde7a0$f0f9b6e0$@leadmon.net> (Howard Leadmon's message of "Thu, 14 Nov 2013 09:29:48 -0500") Message-ID: <44zjp7vwma.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:19:58 -0000 "Howard Leadmon" writes: >> -----Original Message----- >> >> On 11/14/13 07:29, Howard Leadmon wrote: >> > OK, adding in compat9x did allow it to build mysql, and hopefully the > rest, >> > time will tell. I guess the part that somewhat stumps me, is if I am > just >> > building a port fresh like mysql, why does it need the old compatibility >> > libs to build it fresh. Does some of this stuff require gcc libs, or I > am >> > missing something in the process. >> >> It seems you have build tools like cmake that link against 9.x >> libraries. Ideally you should rebuild your build tools before you >> rebuild the things use them to build. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Matthew >> > > > What is needed to rebuild the tools? Maybe I missed that someplace, and > could use a quick hit with a cloo bat. I did another complete build of > world, installed everything, even make sure pkg was seeing my ports, and > then proceeded to rebuild subversion on the machine out of ports. Sure > enough, when it was rebuilt and installed, I see it's still using the 9.x > libs, and I would have thought it would have moved to using the 10.x libs, > so I must be missing something on this side.. The tools in your base system are updated. Now you need to update your ports. You need to update all of them, because some of them are also tools, which are used to build other ports. Rebuilding all your ports has been a recommended step in the procedure for doing a major-version upgrade for a very long time. It's generally *not* needed otherwise. Removing the old libraries is best postponed until *after* that. Good luck. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 14 15:22:13 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62BD6EAC for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:22:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.leadmon.net (mail.leadmon.net [IPv6:2001:550:102:301::13]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19E002418 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:22:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from HDLDESKTOP (hdl-desktop.leadmon.net [10.0.0.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.leadmon.net (8.14.7/8.14.7/Blacklist) with ESMTP id rAEFMBTf072722 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:22:11 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from howard@leadmon.net) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 mail.leadmon.net rAEFMBTf072722 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=leadmon.net; s=default; t=1384442531; bh=V++tSKmRk+geBoSDKxLMAmldxoXLXQqlLyQrwE/OEHc=; h=From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date; b=oyRJk5BALJ/8aiIsAokAyAwPZcPYuFQq99RYobaOdD9n2dLDjqf1ldBvk5rAAmenK HWwv7csR2mcMkmrmZ0iB6kFhEj0SZLDJLuh5O7DTesXMtIyh5o1fx/YVd06RtMUxP5 gjgK9kQGIwwlGOA6Pa/hw5TxoQC26e6t9ks6RRR8= From: "Howard Leadmon" To: "'Lowell Gilbert'" References: <044201cee0ee$c0bc0970$42341c50$@leadmon.net><528475B6.5010604@i nfracaninophile.co.uk><046501cee10b$3d6da9d0$b848fd70$@leadmon.net><5284912 C.4040203@infracaninophile.co.uk><047401cee145$fafde7a0$f0f9b6e0$@leadmon.net> <44zjp7vwma.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <44zjp7vwma.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Subject: RE: Updating from 9.2 to 10.0-BETA3 Issues.. Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:22:11 -0500 Message-ID: <047f01cee14d$4a3a7700$deaf6500$@leadmon.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: AQIdidwB4ZwUAIhG7RjNILAt7h4lIQEVsumKAdCQDoIBlnZXNgJSrU4bAmox7/2ZPbm0oA== Content-Language: en-us X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98 at vorlon.leadmon.net X-Virus-Status: Clean Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:22:13 -0000 I did rebuild all my ports using portupgrade with the -afr option to make sure it did everything, and it said it did, but after that I show stuff like subversion that was rebuilt still using the FBSD 9.x libs. Do I have to set something that will make it use the 10.x stuff? --- Howard Leadmon > >> -----Original Message----- > >> > >> On 11/14/13 07:29, Howard Leadmon wrote: > >> > OK, adding in compat9x did allow it to build mysql, and hopefully the > > rest, > >> > time will tell. I guess the part that somewhat stumps me, is if I am > > just > >> > building a port fresh like mysql, why does it need the old compatibility > >> > libs to build it fresh. Does some of this stuff require gcc libs, or I > > am > >> > missing something in the process. > >> > >> It seems you have build tools like cmake that link against 9.x > >> libraries. Ideally you should rebuild your build tools before you > >> rebuild the things use them to build. > >> > >> Cheers, > >> > >> Matthew > >> > > > > > > What is needed to rebuild the tools? Maybe I missed that someplace, > and > > could use a quick hit with a cloo bat. I did another complete build of > > world, installed everything, even make sure pkg was seeing my ports, and > > then proceeded to rebuild subversion on the machine out of ports. Sure > > enough, when it was rebuilt and installed, I see it's still using the 9.x > > libs, and I would have thought it would have moved to using the 10.x libs, > > so I must be missing something on this side.. > > The tools in your base system are updated. Now you need to update your > ports. You need to update all of them, because some of them are also > tools, which are used to build other ports. Rebuilding all your ports has > been a recommended step in the procedure for doing a major-version > upgrade > for a very long time. It's generally *not* needed otherwise. Removing the > old libraries is best postponed until *after* that. > > Good luck. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 14 16:54:31 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BEAB57C for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 16:54:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-f179.google.com (mail-pd0-f179.google.com [209.85.192.179]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DA342AB7 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 16:54:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f179.google.com with SMTP id g10so2222181pdj.38 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 08:54:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:references:mail-followup-to:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=DOe0qeRJkiiqNsD65DzI4kl474xNbxHF7AO0ZjmzX6k=; b=GApxkZNLYRiQOAhMMQY3dXXSDT4KgzHdrmqi3jxZraUxaUX8rdA7f/CTzPdqsIXb5E 4sMkUowSqbUPdfcZ90xv2fkR2vO+LI/pHZMwpkqoa8Ye1+rBO9xEWOqmM+WbLBF5+rQD npcGWfTsONMuAwMkptyLdIVlzLdg5UHV4qjQMiHhQodpFmnkrKbliAPIjvxEt6tqWXQz 3CH29uaQzQ0l1wwKyGKlFJF6hRynoVJy8Z2Sj7z+iDERy76fkzFV+FeZx2To6dqj/gHg hlDZYVgaontL4S9/lJYSxCjqJr2PQfCjCRy7UUHLfO+SmUo2dRzCNejEXBJC+UoW2Xdh chwQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkxbisJg2HDcvyLiFYNtt1ALo7D0+f3C3UqMj5vPLqhIyFQzzOIwms9/cWNx/lwJ9rERyyx X-Received: by 10.68.163.132 with SMTP id yi4mr2415161pbb.152.1384448065722; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 08:54:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from birch.localnet ([207.55.103.135]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id sg1sm52706622pbb.16.2013.11.14.08.54.24 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 14 Nov 2013 08:54:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from oak.localnet (oak.localnet [192.168.193.34]) by birch.localnet (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B3BD55E22 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 08:54:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from oak.localnet (localhost.localnet [127.0.0.1]) by oak.localnet (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6D5EBCFC for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 08:54:21 -0800 (PST) Received: (from carlj@localhost) by oak.localnet (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id rAEGsLef067637; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 08:54:21 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from carlj@peak.org) X-Authentication-Warning: oak.localnet: carlj set sender to carlj@peak.org using -f From: Carl Johnson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating from 9.2 to 10.0-BETA3 Issues.. References: <044201cee0ee$c0bc0970$42341c50$@leadmon.net> <528475B6.5010604@infracaninophile.co.uk> <046501cee10b$3d6da9d0$b848fd70$@leadmon.net> <5284912C.4040203@infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 08:54:21 -0800 In-Reply-To: <5284912C.4040203@infracaninophile.co.uk> (Matthew Seaman's message of "Thu, 14 Nov 2013 09:00:28 +0000") Message-ID: <87fvqy9b5u.fsf@oak.localnet> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 16:54:31 -0000 Matthew Seaman writes: > Both portmaster and portupgrade are compatible with pkg(8), and you can > certainly carry on using them in pretty much the same way as you always > did. There is a missing bit of functionality with portmaster in that it > won't itself install from pkgs on a pkgngized system. Patches welcome! What is the recommended process for handling portmaster on a new system? I am planning on upgrading a 9.2 system, but I was planning to remove all ports first, then install pkg and portmaster to install the remaining packages. Is there some required order to handle this? -- Carl Johnson carlj@peak.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 14 17:31:52 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84D6B9BC for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 17:31:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A81D2DE7 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 17:31:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com ([178.78.126.226]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rAEHVkQs009028 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 17:31:47 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk rAEHVkQs009028 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1384450307; bh=Ah0yxNxZM2nI6vIwdHLmPpC1YyTx5f9PbFBUEt9JB4I=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; z=Date:=20Thu,=2014=20Nov=202013=2017:31:38=20+0000|From:=20Matthew =20Seaman=20|To:=20freebsd-questi ons@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20Updating=20from=209.2=20to=2010.0 -BETA3=20Issues..|References:=20<044201cee0ee$c0bc0970$42341c50$@l eadmon.net>=20<528475B6.5010604@infracaninophile.co.uk>=20<046501c ee10b$3d6da9d0$b848fd70$@leadmon.net>=20<5284912C.4040203@infracan inophile.co.uk>=20<87fvqy9b5u.fsf@oak.localnet>|In-Reply-To:=20<87 fvqy9b5u.fsf@oak.localnet>; b=nptWJ722Wi60u0x0pzmaY3nWfDaokEc96dX5Wo0EMgIRysq+LAbn7ekwJhMI0E7vh AcjAZq7WZjc+Y0AVCpssRdNHC0a9T/MwWLaf5QvSqEpFc2AVysMwjxbO63lTTCLuCL pSEacetpayMDftA/BDdgQCg1qObc4xi9wY4eOGHA= X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host [178.78.126.226] claimed to be ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com Message-ID: <528508FA.7060502@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 17:31:38 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating from 9.2 to 10.0-BETA3 Issues.. References: <044201cee0ee$c0bc0970$42341c50$@leadmon.net> <528475B6.5010604@infracaninophile.co.uk> <046501cee10b$3d6da9d0$b848fd70$@leadmon.net> <5284912C.4040203@infracaninophile.co.uk> <87fvqy9b5u.fsf@oak.localnet> In-Reply-To: <87fvqy9b5u.fsf@oak.localnet> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="W3qWk1guNvlKscvgQGPpLuiPe9bhUxWP8" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DCC_CHECK, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,RDNS_NONE autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 17:31:52 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --W3qWk1guNvlKscvgQGPpLuiPe9bhUxWP8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 11/14/13 16:54, Carl Johnson wrote: > Matthew Seaman writes: >> Both portmaster and portupgrade are compatible with pkg(8), and you ca= n >> certainly carry on using them in pretty much the same way as you alway= s >> did. There is a missing bit of functionality with portmaster in that = it >> won't itself install from pkgs on a pkgngized system. Patches welcome= ! >=20 > What is the recommended process for handling portmaster on a new system= ? > I am planning on upgrading a 9.2 system, but I was planning to remove > all ports first, then install pkg and portmaster to install the > remaining packages. Is there some required order to handle this? >=20 Yes. Install pkg first, then portmater, then anything else you may desire. Note that you'll need 'WITH_PKGNG=3DYES' in /etc/make.conf if yo= u on FreeBSD 9.x (or below) and you are goingto build your own packages rather than using the binary packages from pkg.freebsd.org. Cheers, Matthew --W3qWk1guNvlKscvgQGPpLuiPe9bhUxWP8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJShQkBXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQxOUYxNTRFQ0JGMTEyRTUwNTQ0RTNGMzAw MDUxM0YxMEUwQTlFNEU3AAoJEABRPxDgqeTnK0IP/0wFQtUj9q9HWI357fcLUQgl WH83u/uSA/9RhhU1L6shimZNYTLVppAz50pgY9KPWkKstgRI1iNKkqwMaMprp6rL 5OCE8DYeHKxNOansIqBqy827/BrHUyyJFjU8TqsbIl2Hbpi1+ifpfwvcuqgU+Miq YsEPi6GOI+2uLkr4n1ZHutOoQZd9XQDq8N8qwcLqTsf9D+9ItCJG3mCu3fwy0ia+ rfspsQe1qAqoETxNmtFHBnX+HZCoOP/5MldG2dB8oeMKQztIP0uYhez/d6HkGQi1 TZHqhtnJp0rUlsfmYhw661v8X5C57OFe+dNq2+A38xiWimKSm/EB+ekZ0eYYtaHA czAbVOhLx1WcncXFO51tjWw9d7sEc99oLkyHsP8olp9M1zjY96ztXY0fc+zBF6TH WjfZkMZpTt+IJ9bvbi7sypI+i+qkTxiGunmaY6VLZ2Gf2cm0ZEYZqaZjtwxqXOnZ dHupoM9z9b744smpR7Ol16PZ+DOax2DNayz8SoU0uHgj5mnaa2VvyYCpN/XQGYr9 oLFKv7mZNhwhUUARGHLjY3k5DsrsKKa1t+feE03EbVU0MGPW6qjVNlNYPmrzz37O 0/ap/naexVB6sRyFmAylAv3mfQ0HHjYeiYD8fn+kN1u1N1ZteITCe6PlizqbvdwM eq+JcwQHTr1HbJHRsceU =bmmN -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --W3qWk1guNvlKscvgQGPpLuiPe9bhUxWP8-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Nov 14 23:10:38 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD538D4A for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 23:10:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pb0-f48.google.com (mail-pb0-f48.google.com [209.85.160.48]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8F9CD2624 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 23:10:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f48.google.com with SMTP id mc17so2707908pbc.35 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:10:31 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:references:mail-followup-to:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=NZoa3PHfQUcI/HvhEMVYHv/5SFpNBOYqwEW/fsbcLvM=; b=Tr9lgzvyNsJMNfRp8k+eiZfUSA8F6ihsylvkvPqWKraaLg/QTa+vrOqukOcB9NHwVR vnhO/UEQWebibwCOHGSGgR4xc+aCCBW+vwwA5JpJXiS/vxkYKZbWMkWgrbrDlHk+SfkY aboVHMwEhJ8bUsTef3tGS893TVlL2wF8SCFmPldH/yZXDuRFlEWea9p68/HBZoRgYaJt 0mzttxWoxvPhpqx7TT7yvi/3RSlxSkULsHZvfWx8JrOapOEV3/B/txZhkd4+zPIjGP1m 8DMEHHSnRd+pl4kAl/LU5+2C0GyN6HYfnbGjMpwPooRp15xiPECnPxDHhF5ATT+SX707 uFag== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl4wU5V6wn8Zz+wc7ZllSp5BqSunvKbhjlgsxFkIa9ZKJLXHYARZaQE700H35pTwY3OiYgF X-Received: by 10.66.149.73 with SMTP id ty9mr3809448pab.36.1384470303602; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:05:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from birch.localnet ([207.55.103.135]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id xs1sm150959pac.7.2013.11.14.15.05.02 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:05:02 -0800 (PST) Received: from oak.localnet (oak.localnet [192.168.193.34]) by birch.localnet (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43B6755E22 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:05:00 -0800 (PST) Received: from oak.localnet (localhost.localnet [127.0.0.1]) by oak.localnet (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16F05BF2E for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:05:00 -0800 (PST) Received: (from carlj@localhost) by oak.localnet (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id rAEN4xXI069135; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:04:59 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from carlj@peak.org) X-Authentication-Warning: oak.localnet: carlj set sender to carlj@peak.org using -f From: Carl Johnson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating from 9.2 to 10.0-BETA3 Issues.. References: <044201cee0ee$c0bc0970$42341c50$@leadmon.net> <528475B6.5010604@infracaninophile.co.uk> <046501cee10b$3d6da9d0$b848fd70$@leadmon.net> <5284912C.4040203@infracaninophile.co.uk> <87fvqy9b5u.fsf@oak.localnet> <528508FA.7060502@infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:04:59 -0800 In-Reply-To: <528508FA.7060502@infracaninophile.co.uk> (Matthew Seaman's message of "Thu, 14 Nov 2013 17:31:38 +0000") Message-ID: <877gca8u04.fsf@oak.localnet> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 23:10:38 -0000 Matthew Seaman writes: > On 11/14/13 16:54, Carl Johnson wrote: >> Matthew Seaman writes: >>> Both portmaster and portupgrade are compatible with pkg(8), and you can >>> certainly carry on using them in pretty much the same way as you always >>> did. There is a missing bit of functionality with portmaster in that it >>> won't itself install from pkgs on a pkgngized system. Patches welcome! >> >> What is the recommended process for handling portmaster on a new system? >> I am planning on upgrading a 9.2 system, but I was planning to remove >> all ports first, then install pkg and portmaster to install the >> remaining packages. Is there some required order to handle this? >> > > Yes. Install pkg first, then portmater, then anything else you may > desire. Note that you'll need 'WITH_PKGNG=YES' in /etc/make.conf if you > on FreeBSD 9.x (or below) and you are goingto build your own packages > rather than using the binary packages from pkg.freebsd.org. Thanks for the reply, but that is still not clear. You said above that portmaster "won't itself install from pkgs", so I am not sure what that means. Does that mean that using pkg to install portmaster will work properly? I am planning to wait for the release, so hopefully the release notes will have good install/upgrade instructions. -- Carl Johnson carlj@peak.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 15 00:22:43 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CFB0195 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 00:22:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BD782968 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 00:22:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id 9E5D133C25; Thu, 14 Nov 2013 19:22:41 -0500 (EST) From: Lowell Gilbert To: "Howard Leadmon" Subject: Re: Updating from 9.2 to 10.0-BETA3 Issues.. References: <044201cee0ee$c0bc0970$42341c50$@leadmon.net> <528475B6.5010604@i nfracaninophile.co.uk> <046501cee10b$3d6da9d0$b848fd70$@leadmon.net> <5284912 C.4040203@infracaninophile.co.uk> <047401cee145$fafde7a0$f0f9b6e0$@leadmon.net> <44zjp7vwma.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <047f01cee14d$4a3a7700$deaf6500$@leadmon.net> Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2013 19:22:41 -0500 In-Reply-To: <047f01cee14d$4a3a7700$deaf6500$@leadmon.net> (Howard Leadmon's message of "Thu, 14 Nov 2013 10:22:11 -0500") Message-ID: <44li0qwm26.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 00:22:43 -0000 Please don't top-post. "Howard Leadmon" writes: > I did rebuild all my ports using portupgrade with the -afr option to make > sure it did everything, and it said it did, but after that I show stuff like > subversion that was rebuilt still using the FBSD 9.x libs. Do I have to > set something that will make it use the 10.x stuff? > Based on those symptoms, my strong suspicion is that subversion was not, in fact, updated. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 15 07:25:37 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86F7818E for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 07:25:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 122E3234D for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 07:25:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rAF7PWnT034627 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 07:25:32 GMT (envelope-from m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk rAF7PWnT034627 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infracaninophile.co.uk; s=201001-infracaninophile; t=1384500332; bh=D54y0e3j6ORLz6XY3qQah7RqBnkMpyqqxgE2EuRsAuI=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; z=Date:=20Fri,=2015=20Nov=202013=2007:25:32=20+0000|From:=20Matthew =20Seaman=20|To:=20freebsd-questi ons@freebsd.org|Subject:=20Re:=20Updating=20from=209.2=20to=2010.0 -BETA3=20Issues..|References:=20<044201cee0ee$c0bc0970$42341c50$@l eadmon.net>=20<528475B6.5010604@infracaninophile.co.uk>=20<046501c ee10b$3d6da9d0$b848fd70$@leadmon.net>=20<5284912C.4040203@infracan inophile.co.uk>=20<87fvqy9b5u.fsf@oak.localnet>=20<528508FA.706050 2@infracaninophile.co.uk>=20<877gca8u04.fsf@oak.localnet>|In-Reply -To:=20<877gca8u04.fsf@oak.localnet>; b=z0GRAvXgHham/3R0K+iwigdVfAjVc6s01PUoAg/S4WbrGyKAzag0LIsPi3O3TIRzW qOkXkAV/SfB/fbdtT3qJzl415oNRARjPjArZk637yT96ZJATgER0XX9U1GQfGV0INu CAQ0Hlq6X1SKo5MV5NAdaA4qfHyp/iqTZ160ajy8= Message-ID: <5285CC6C.3090706@infracaninophile.co.uk> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 07:25:32 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating from 9.2 to 10.0-BETA3 Issues.. References: <044201cee0ee$c0bc0970$42341c50$@leadmon.net> <528475B6.5010604@infracaninophile.co.uk> <046501cee10b$3d6da9d0$b848fd70$@leadmon.net> <5284912C.4040203@infracaninophile.co.uk> <87fvqy9b5u.fsf@oak.localnet> <528508FA.7060502@infracaninophile.co.uk> <877gca8u04.fsf@oak.localnet> In-Reply-To: <877gca8u04.fsf@oak.localnet> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 OpenPGP: id=E7F39EBF Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="85A8XkqX1li8bnKq6vL5INNBdcau2N5Qo" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.5 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 07:25:37 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --85A8XkqX1li8bnKq6vL5INNBdcau2N5Qo Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 14/11/2013 23:04, Carl Johnson wrote: > Matthew Seaman writes: >=20 >> On 11/14/13 16:54, Carl Johnson wrote: >>> Matthew Seaman writes: >>>> Both portmaster and portupgrade are compatible with pkg(8), and you = can >>>> certainly carry on using them in pretty much the same way as you alw= ays >>>> did. There is a missing bit of functionality with portmaster in tha= t it >>>> won't itself install from pkgs on a pkgngized system. Patches welco= me! >>> >>> What is the recommended process for handling portmaster on a new syst= em? >>> I am planning on upgrading a 9.2 system, but I was planning to remov= e >>> all ports first, then install pkg and portmaster to install the >>> remaining packages. Is there some required order to handle this? >>> >> >> Yes. Install pkg first, then portmater, then anything else you may >> desire. Note that you'll need 'WITH_PKGNG=3DYES' in /etc/make.conf if= you >> on FreeBSD 9.x (or below) and you are goingto build your own packages >> rather than using the binary packages from pkg.freebsd.org. >=20 > Thanks for the reply, but that is still not clear. You said above that= > portmaster "won't itself install from pkgs", so I am not sure what that= > means. Does that mean that using pkg to install portmaster will work > properly? I am planning to wait for the release, so hopefully the > release notes will have good install/upgrade instructions. It means the -P or -PP options to portmaster don't do what you expect. Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey JID: matthew@infracaninophile.co.uk --85A8XkqX1li8bnKq6vL5INNBdcau2N5Qo Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJShcxsXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATt+cQAJUgpaCkwYTZmAiv3x699JND tVGZ6OX/3c5mbk5SDqULoNeO7fOAgDb5SLC7vWPfdo4HwYEImCiq9qFidDOFkZWH Y/FDjd39Hx5n3Tx3ASH6Zz/N+p7Kww+ruXTMI5BmbXL7s462geiknC9b0SSowtJT 6LmssS4Z33ooMB2DUuUEuXD8MZEmekXtTemtrB/tdqsHWwyQk/EHYtzX/pq8Aw+b yQy1E0vsU/RDnjJEuVXodqON6xmuw6qWy9W8/B2Zgh0u8lGJ6AvgpnavV88lOx8y Ihlko7zjGQm+TgIxqYJhU+jAhKkv7ucRL+fO7BLKZntcN//xZBA7Pmfr7/pJpwBI q87LRgkXmLQSWRuk+kngg7sm2HW4+HHyK3vwgBugCkRu64Dt19EeuR0lLndJfFh3 gcBFrm+ndENZnf2SAdlV5FwUIM3XswSXqkrORvyXq4vIHWLJGV+WVcPzK+iXqkaR ig7aIkFbaLd3tV5Q595xBgnu3PNUrg5JV5BraCPrc8aqO3We45k7nlNVtOQOsFk2 KO8ZrD41cK1p1heALQz1ZHWMbglp8Xx8dt8he36b8NYxUscjTRzPEmgiagab9bjq cFwmWl7eF+mylay8t8CvpQ38DC8DS+VKmydS9Av/ZeLWQF6EiCT4cRU7SKQok6DF enOfbdUMLSaIkj/i/yIe =q2U8 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --85A8XkqX1li8bnKq6vL5INNBdcau2N5Qo-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 15 09:25:06 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42EB5236 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 09:25:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.leadmon.net (mail.leadmon.net [IPv6:2001:550:102:301::13]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F4EE2A76 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 09:25:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from HDLDESKTOP (hdl-desktop.leadmon.net [10.0.0.3]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.leadmon.net (8.14.7/8.14.7/Blacklist) with ESMTP id rAF9P3KU028367 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Fri, 15 Nov 2013 04:25:03 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from howard@leadmon.net) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 mail.leadmon.net rAF9P3KU028367 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=leadmon.net; s=default; t=1384507504; bh=oJFM04PDX16Mcg1qF1xtGDqCV9cARqlzxvUiaweBJB0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date; b=DhS/7E3NH0wp6CVWOrTudwv/EDwMH3Xg3FJYBo13tZfAxW4bsaAr/CtwXOh0hZFza uvgqdDpmtTYdujSEGPpRiBV84krQ0BatPXaChYs3B6La3B/DKCRk36TYUhAV/BQY4G dHw6nPFPSGmBIFvNBgPsjaMMER8gh3FauISZilXw= From: "Howard Leadmon" To: , Subject: RE: KVM/QEMU and Freebsd 9.1 or later (Actually 10.0) Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 04:25:00 -0500 Message-ID: <04f801cee1e4$91068600$b3139200$@leadmon.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0 Thread-Index: Ac7h5I6k78RnzOqkRvKGrEB3KDcMqA== Content-Language: en-us X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98 at vorlon.leadmon.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 09:25:06 -0000 Not sure if you ever figured out anything on this one, but I am seeing the exact same symptoms as you, and my configuration over here is: HP Proliant DL580-G5 w/4 hexacore Xeon E7450 processors and 32G RAM Host OS is CentOS 6.4 (kernel 2.6.32-358.23.2.el6.x86_64) If I load FBSD 9, no problem, in fact I have 9.2 running ZFS quite well currently, but as you mentioned, if I try and load 10.0-BETA3, it starts to boot and just freezes, and I have tried it multiple times. Not sure if there is anything I can do on boot that might help with this, or if there is any way to help debug this issue, but it's for sure a change in 10.0, as any older releases are just fine. --- Howard Leadmon > -----Original Message----- > > I want to run FreeBSD 9.2 under KVM/QEMU, but this is not working due to > CPU problems. There seems to be a bug somewhere reading the forums tell > me the problem should be fixed on KVM/QEMU side. For some reason > unknown > to me release 9.0 works with my current setup. > > Host information: > > - Dell server with Intel Xeon E5345 "Clovertown" CPU > - Ubuntu LTS 12.04.03 > - Linux kernel 3.2.0.55.65 > - KVM/QEMU released with 12.04 LTS (aka Precise). > > Guest information > > - FreeBSD 9.2 > > The problem is that booting freezes the virtual machine after 1 second > during the boot stage, do not get any boot menu at all. > > In forums i read that the problem was related to the features (sse4 etc) > in the CPU type and model. I tried to change CPU from "core2duo" that > was detected by KVM to something different but no luck. > > Please help me out, what is the problem..and how to solve it? > > Is this problem related to FreeBSD or KVM/QEMU? Why is it working with > FreeBSD 9.0? > > /Best Regards > Magnus Not sure if you ever figured out anything on this one, but I am seeing the exact same symptoms as you, and my configuration over here is: HP Proliant DL580-G5 w/4 hexacore Xeon E7450 processors and 32G RAM Host OS is CentOS 6.4 (kernel 2.6.32-358.23.2.el6.x86_64) If I load FBSD 9, no problem, in fact I have 9.2 running ZFS quite well currently, but as you mentioned, if I try and load 10.0-BETA3, it starts to boot and just freezes, and I have tried it multiple times. Not sure if there is anything I can do on boot that might help with this, or if there is any way to help debug this issue, but it's for sure a change in 10.0, as any older releases are just fine. --- Howard Leadmon From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 15 10:07:59 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18460573 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 10:07:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.eutelia.it (mp1-smtp-6.eutelia.it [62.94.10.166]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2C092D39 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 10:07:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ns2.biolchim.it (ip-188-188.sn2.eutelia.it [83.211.188.188]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.eutelia.it (Eutelia) with ESMTP id E3D226AA451 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:07:49 +0100 (CET) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-240-148.41-151.net24.it [151.41.148.240]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns2.biolchim.it (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rAFA7jHb048083 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:07:46 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: ns2.biolchim.it: Host adsl-ull-240-148.41-151.net24.it [151.41.148.240] claimed to be soth.ventu Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rAFA7dbq026308; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:07:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <5285F26B.90209@netfence.it> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:07:39 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@rsle.net Subject: [SOLVED] Re: [Half OT] Mavericks' Mail and SSL References: <52718078.8080702@netfence.it> <5272C747.8030805@rsle.net> <5273EF3F.8040307@netfence.it> <5273FD23.7090207@rsle.net> <527554CE.1040605@netfence.it> <527905F3.6020501@rsle.net> <527CB33C.5090804@netfence.it> <527CF75E.8010703@rsle.net> <5280B8C0.8070206@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <5280B8C0.8070206@netfence.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (ns2.biolchim.it [192.168.2.203]); Fri, 15 Nov 2013 11:07:46 +0100 (CET) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 10:07:59 -0000 On 11/11/13 12:00, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > On 11/08/13 15:38, R. Scott Evans wrote: >> You might have a solution from Apple.... I was greeted with this update >> on my Mac today: http://support.apple.com/kb/HT6030 >> >> It's for compatibility with Gmail, but it might carry over to other mail >> systems? > > Unfortunately, it looks like it didn't... > > Thanks > av. Don't know why (perhaps Apple released another update?), but my customer told me the problem is gone since yesterday, with no change from my side. bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 15 10:48:47 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1ECB2647 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 10:48:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from cdptpa-oedge-vip.email.rr.com (cdptpa-outbound-snat.email.rr.com [107.14.166.225]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF0B52015 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 10:48:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [96.28.178.143] ([96.28.178.143:55125] helo=localhost) by cdptpa-oedge02 (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 3.5.0.35861 r(Momo-dev:tip)) with ESMTP id 7D/F5-29861-70CF5825; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 10:48:40 +0000 Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 10:48:39 +0000 Message-ID: <7D.F5.29861.70CF5825@cdptpa-oedge02> From: "Thomas Mueller" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Source tree and ports tree on Linux file system? X-RR-Connecting-IP: 107.14.168.130:25 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 10:48:47 -0000 > I think the /usr/src and /usr/ports tree can be "read only" > when they are "sourced" for building purposes. It's just > important where /usr/obj and the working directories for > stuff from /usr/ports are mapped to. If you have more than > enough RAM, you can make a memory disk and locate them > there. Otherwise, using a UFS partition (wherever it is > actually located) sounds better. The ports collection > allows setting a "working directory prefix" to move the > creation of files out of /usr/ports. Pay attention to > also deal with /usr/ports/distfiles (where the source > archives are stored) and /usr/ports/packages (if you're > going to build packages). In the case of a Linux file system, source tree and ports tree don't have to be read-only. But I figured it was safer to use UFS if possible, which is why I built subversion from pkgsrc on my USB-stick installation of NetBSD-current amd64. NetBSD 6.1_STABLE consistently hung on boot. I would need to keep changes to src and ports trees, so don't want to use memory disk if I don't have to. But I am reluctant to try to build ports when I can't connect to the Internet from FreeBSD on MSI Z77 MPOWER motherboard. Conceivably I could make fetchlist in FreeBSD and download from NetBSD, but that's too cumbersome and cloak-and-dagger. With more than one FreeBSD installation, both amd64 and i386, ports and src directories can be /usr/ports and /usr/src only on one computer, unless I download ports and src trees redundantly. I keep packages in /usr/packages and distfiles in $PORTSDIR/distfiles. I also have to keep separate WRKDIRs so builds for different installations don't collide, like WRKDIR=${.CURDIR}/work9amd64 and WRKDIR=${.CURDIR}/work9i386 For HEAD and 10-STABLE, I change 9 to 11 or 10. Tom From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 15 13:48:11 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E3C90894 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 13:48:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mta2.myideeli.com (mta2.myideeli.com [66.231.92.128]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0EEC29FF for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 13:48:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=200608; d=myideeli.com; h=From:To:Subject:Date:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Message-ID:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; i=alert@myideeli.com; bh=zDTO0Tdn6ce2jEl/5NTeH3jG2B4=; b=AuRIczoudBf3zB3LebWTVTT7vylkt+ZZmBkQsg0SET5STfR+EwhIoSffXEXxMLMGZBEnK3A32KV2 TIUb+Ed3fJIw11ufscNme2JvcjVYq0l9UX7stOfSWo9ywCzmb+7hKN2oEl1S+uBCCSVECFpHYjls beQUkhZ5cBuzeeKye8w= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=200608; d=myideeli.com; b=XO8B1jgHz15xH19pLZt2pUT9mIVtzrp98yEjbv54RNkv+iX/fmkjSgG5d1nVouvETjTC2XwoF3IV dIbQsKHReFAs+86BPGRcXWN9ipyjYTlA+v8g2D4KRBiKk691mHYtn98TX/Avaq62NrNr+ex9mIz1 0I6r1y7Mm44i1+71fss=; Received: by mta2.myideeli.com id hgoj1m163hsk for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 07:32:37 -0600 (envelope-from ) From: "ideeli" To: Subject: JB Clothing has sent you an invitation. Please RSVP. Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 07:32:37 -0600 x-job: 10090167_7406 Message-ID: <80ae8bf0-bc97-4f66-933c-bc8536a5388f@xtinmta141.xt.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.16 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list Reply-To: ideeli List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 13:48:12 -0000 [1]ideeli [2]join now JB invites you to join ideeli, the first invite-only shopping community coming soon to ideeli spectacular prices and fabulous giveaways Join now to access these events. Membership is free. __________________________________________________________________ [3]Miscshoot_85270_02 TOMMY HILFIGER sale Black Down Jacket with Faux Fur Trim Hood Up to 81% off [4]105414-hero-11-15-13-josie_by_natori-cf-30139_1_150x150 JOSIE BY NATORI sale Blue Lagoon Indo Stripe Chemise Up to 48% off __________________________________________________________________ What is ideeli? ideeli is an invite-only online shopping community that gives members privileged access to not only sought-after products in fashion, home and beauty, but also to luxury lifestyle experiences like fashion shows and sold-out concerts. Since your friends invited you, you're in luck, and you can join. [5]join now Learn more about our [6]privacy policy To opt out of all future emails from ideeli [7]go here ideeli Inc., 620 8th Ave, 45th floor, New York, NY, 10018 [1.ver?at=i&d=imp&ety=invitation&dte=20131115&esb=JB%20Clothing%20has%2 0sent%20you%20an%20invitation.%20Please%20RSVP.] [open.aspx?ffcb10-ff2e13747562-fe261577706d0279751479-fe671570756d047c7 313-ff9e1570-fe631574756c067c7d10-fec5167572640774] References 1. http://www.ideeli.com/invite/ps6gp7?utm_campaign=Friends&utm_medium=email&utm_source=ideeli 2. http://www.ideeli.com/invite/ps6gp7?utm_campaign=Friends&utm_medium=email&utm_source=ideeli 3. http://www.ideeli.com/invite/ps6gp7?utm_campaign=Friends&utm_medium=email&utm_source=ideeli 4. http://www.ideeli.com/invite/ps6gp7?utm_campaign=Friends&utm_medium=email&utm_source=ideeli 5. http://www.ideeli.com/invite/ps6gp7?utm_campaign=Friends&utm_medium=email&utm_source=ideeli 6. http://click.myideeli.com/?qs=a88127e6aff8eaea5d2255c8e8612b84c207d36e1c30ff32f1b33e950cfed33f2a0aa657962144ca 7. http://click.myideeli.com/?qs=194dcbf8032ac0650d4d4e9bf55f2ee0bb1325535dcb14a6cfe5f0541abb1405615844ec294e9cef From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 15 14:20:29 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D814F1C4 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 14:20:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tampoco.espindola.nl (tampoco.espindola.nl [149.210.133.191]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D2062BDB for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 14:20:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (corfu.internal.deze.org [192.168.1.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: frank) by tampoco.espindola.nl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1607D372044 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:11:05 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <52862B79.5060603@deze.org> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:11:05 +0100 From: Frank Volf User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20131028 Thunderbird/17.0.10 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Building ports in jails after staging support Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 14:20:29 -0000 Hi, I'm having a FreeBSD 9.1-RELEASE system with some jails. The jails have problems building/upgrading ports after staging support was added to the /usr/ports tree. I'm using portupgrade for the upgrades (but that is not political, if another tool does the job then that is fine as well). I searched the archives of this list and if I understood that there are two problem areas: 1) All jails share a union-mounted read-only copy of the /usr/ports tree, and staging tries by default to write in /usr/ports 2) My jails are build according to the description in the FreeBSD handbook and the symbolic link in the jails that points usr/local to ../s/usr-local is causing problems as well. I found several messages from people describing work-arounds (e.g. setting PACKAGES or NO_STAGE in /etc/make.conf), adjusting PREFIX in pkgtools.conf. Some messages seem to be contradicting each other (like NO_STAGE should not be defined), and some solution only solve one of the two problems. So, my question is simply: is there an official (future proof) way how to fix this? In other words, what should I do to get portupgrade or any other port mgmt tool working again in the jails with my setup? Regards, Frank From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 15 14:49:52 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91816BEC for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 14:49:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.lariat.net (mail.lariat.net [66.62.230.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37AF92DA4 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 14:49:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Toshi.lariat.net (IDENT:ppp1000.lariat.net@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.lariat.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA04566 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 07:49:44 -0700 (MST) Message-Id: <201311151449.HAA04566@mail.lariat.net> X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9 Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 07:49:38 -0700 To: questions@freebsd.org From: Brett Glass Subject: lagg(4) question Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 14:49:52 -0000 I'm interested in using lagg(4) to provide failover from a main wireless link to a backup link. Unfortunately, one of the common failure modes, when a link fails, is for the Ethernet port on the radio to stay up but not pass any traffic. Does lagg(4) test the link, by actually trying to send packets, to determine if the link has failed? Or does it rely upon the Ethernet link losing "carrier"? --Brett Glass From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 15 15:14:50 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D1AAA86 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:14:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ns.kevlo.org (220-135-115-6.HINET-IP.hinet.net [220.135.115.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 199A72F9A for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:14:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from netsys.kevlo.org (mail.kevlo.org [220.135.115.6]) by ns.kevlo.org (8.14.6/8.14.6) with ESMTP id rAFFEBFX086679; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 23:14:13 +0800 (CST) (envelope-from kevlo@FreeBSD.org) Message-ID: <52863A61.5040804@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 23:14:41 +0800 From: Kevin Lo User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin Laabs , FreeBSD Subject: Re: 5Ghz WLan USB Stick recommendation? References: <52764BB4.9000007@martinlaabs.de> In-Reply-To: <52764BB4.9000007@martinlaabs.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:14:50 -0000 On 2013/11/03 21:12, Martin Laabs wrote: > Hi, > > can someone recommend me a current available USB WLan stick with 5GHz > support? In my flat there are so many 2.4GHz Wlans nearby that I reach > only about 100kbit/s even 2m from my access point. > Since my AP already supports 5GHz Wlan I search a stick for my FreeBSD-9 > powered laptop. (So I would prefer a very small one even if the antenna > is not as effective as the antenna in bigger sticks.) The Edimax EW-7722UnD wlan dongle (RT3572) works for me. Connection is stable, and I'm able to send this message using this device. > > Thank you, > Martin Laabs > Kevin From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 15 15:15:43 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 122FFB2D for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:15:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jab.dat.pl (dat.pl [80.51.155.34]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C61C02FB1 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:15:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jab.dat.pl (jsrv.dat.pl [127.0.0.1]) by jab.dat.pl (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9293C241; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:08:55 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at dat.pl Received: from jab.dat.pl ([127.0.0.1]) by jab.dat.pl (jab.dat.pl [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ZQJbsD2QfmUf; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:08:53 +0100 (CET) Received: from [10.0.6.80] (unknown [212.69.68.42]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by jab.dat.pl (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C9DA251; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:08:52 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <52863984.5050707@dat.pl> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:11:00 +0100 From: Maciej Milewski User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: David Newman , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: increasing the size of the NanoBSD /cfg slice References: <5283F043.1070908@networktest.com> In-Reply-To: <5283F043.1070908@networktest.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:15:43 -0000 On 13.11.2013 22:33, David Newman wrote: > Greetings. For NanoBSD running on FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE i386, what is the > parameter to increase the size of the /cfg partition? > > There's a NANO_RAM_TMPVARSIZE option to set the sizes of the /tmp and > /var RAM disks but I don't see a similar option in nanobsd.conf or > nanobsd.sh for setting the size of the /cfg partition. > > The system currently allocates 1.4 Mbytes to /cfg, but I'll need at > least 20 Mbytes of permanent storage. How to address? > > thanks > > dn > > ps. If there's a better forum for NanoBSD questions, please advise. NanoBSD is part of FreeBSD so this list is fine. Maybe you are looking for NANO_CONFSIZE? I have such explaination in my appliance.configfile: # Size of configuration file system in 512 bytes sectors # Cannot be zero. NANO_CONFSIZE=$((1024/512*1024*16)) # 16 M -- Pozdrawiam, Maciej Milewski From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 15 15:19:53 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C633FD1C for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:19:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bs1.fjl.org.uk (bs1.fjl.org.uk [84.45.41.196]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A0332FED for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:19:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.35] (host86-164-139-120.range86-164.btcentralplus.com [86.164.139.120]) (authenticated bits=0) by bs1.fjl.org.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id rAFFJjAg098935 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:19:45 GMT (envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk) Message-ID: <52863B93.5030903@fjl.co.uk> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:19:47 +0000 From: Frank Leonhardt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: lagg(4) question References: <201311151449.HAA04566@mail.lariat.net> In-Reply-To: <201311151449.HAA04566@mail.lariat.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.16 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:19:53 -0000 On 15/11/2013 14:49, Brett Glass wrote: > I'm interested in using lagg(4) to provide failover from a main > wireless link to a backup link. Unfortunately, one of the common > failure modes, when a link fails, is for the Ethernet port on the > radio to stay up but not pass any traffic. Does lagg(4) test the link, > by actually trying to send packets, to determine if the link has > failed? Or does it rely upon the Ethernet link losing "carrier"? > > --Brett Glass I'm pretty sure you're right. lagg (aka truck) determines if an interface is working by checking its "up" flag in the link_state flags field; it also checks the firewall's idea. I stand to be corrected, but I think it's only the interface driver's responsibility to check for a carrier, not to "down" itself it's its not getting data through when the hardware layer looks healthy. If we're right in our assumption, you could always have a cron job ping through the main wireless link, and if it fails to get a response you could fail it (down it with ifconfig), triggering lagg. Or you could just as easily ignore lagg and reconfigure the interfaces yourself. Regards, Frank. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 15 16:46:47 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04E87556 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from keepquiet.net (keepquiet.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:130:84c1::deaf:babe]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE1E525FD for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:46:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.113.229.187] (2.150.20.87.tmi.telenormobil.no [2.150.20.87]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: terje@elde.net) by keepquiet.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BA2CF2E077; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 17:46:36 +0100 (CET) References: <201311151449.HAA04566@mail.lariat.net> In-Reply-To: <201311151449.HAA04566@mail.lariat.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B329) From: Terje Elde Subject: Re: lagg(4) question Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 17:46:31 +0100 To: Brett Glass Cc: "questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:46:47 -0000 On 15. nov. 2013, at 15:49, Brett Glass wrote: > I'm interested in using lagg(4) to provide failover from a main wireless l= ink to a backup link. Unfortunately, one of the common failure modes, when a= link fails, is for the Ethernet port on the radio to stay up but not pass a= ny traffic. What Frank said.=20 But also, if you can't fix it at L2, look at L3. That is, instead of doing e= thernet-failover, you could use IP and routing-based failover, based on RIP o= r OSPF. That'll be a bit to read up on though.=20 Terje From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 15 16:51:42 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA6E3788 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:51:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-f182.google.com (mail-pd0-f182.google.com [209.85.192.182]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87FC92673 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:51:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f182.google.com with SMTP id y13so3689703pdi.41 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 08:51:36 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:references:mail-followup-to:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=JwNkVYfTCm51CoNaCIIfSERvg/IPDdSc6XTtXbUGjCo=; b=KLev/XIiIdyo1l4Yy/8za5cCeNDxMV8EM2FlA4iiGczZTAxxwjZTPZZiqdbuQs0aZH Rrdr3J4JfDYQT5em/Ao1SB00+TocpEJx6ZBMUPrz31NO6Q1NbuJuRGwXiwHP/5F4ptcJ gz7R3AFNVL6qf29rMCHFWbxbEPXIT3RgLlT/qr0pzsyhI7v0bQcu1sUX3DvtwA4fChDg 7cMWlX4w4Wd+B0TeGEDgDUNJuOisxZ3xNfkzSSCZdv1buisYIc/DXsC/1Ul19r8ydvIV qvaiwa7StBhFwo+Gg+j7cXdjOdw0cGx3/rtTnTBloW7hrkc9ZzCochc5EZ3iCPa8RsjN gVvQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkh0EKSaQUJCQNNFsvOagd5NhfbMwXuc/PA3YTJ886OtI2DYsaCnOk0dhODdhI/fn1YbJLL X-Received: by 10.66.27.16 with SMTP id p16mr7675398pag.65.1384534296233; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 08:51:36 -0800 (PST) Received: from birch.localnet ([207.55.103.135]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ql10sm5579476pbc.44.2013.11.15.08.51.35 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 15 Nov 2013 08:51:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from oak.localnet (oak.localnet [192.168.193.34]) by birch.localnet (Postfix) with ESMTP id 544F955E22 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 08:51:33 -0800 (PST) Received: from oak.localnet (localhost.localnet [127.0.0.1]) by oak.localnet (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B5FFBFE8 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 08:51:33 -0800 (PST) Received: (from carlj@localhost) by oak.localnet (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id rAFGpWBK061054; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 08:51:32 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from carlj@peak.org) X-Authentication-Warning: oak.localnet: carlj set sender to carlj@peak.org using -f From: Carl Johnson To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Updating from 9.2 to 10.0-BETA3 Issues.. References: <044201cee0ee$c0bc0970$42341c50$@leadmon.net> <528475B6.5010604@infracaninophile.co.uk> <046501cee10b$3d6da9d0$b848fd70$@leadmon.net> <5284912C.4040203@infracaninophile.co.uk> <87fvqy9b5u.fsf@oak.localnet> <528508FA.7060502@infracaninophile.co.uk> <877gca8u04.fsf@oak.localnet> <5285CC6C.3090706@infracaninophile.co.uk> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 08:51:32 -0800 In-Reply-To: <5285CC6C.3090706@infracaninophile.co.uk> (Matthew Seaman's message of "Fri, 15 Nov 2013 07:25:32 +0000") Message-ID: <8738mx8v6z.fsf@oak.localnet> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 16:51:42 -0000 Matthew Seaman writes: > On 14/11/2013 23:04, Carl Johnson wrote: >> Matthew Seaman writes: >> >>> On 11/14/13 16:54, Carl Johnson wrote: >>>> Matthew Seaman writes: >>>>> Both portmaster and portupgrade are compatible with pkg(8), and you can >>>>> certainly carry on using them in pretty much the same way as you always >>>>> did. There is a missing bit of functionality with portmaster in that it >>>>> won't itself install from pkgs on a pkgngized system. Patches welcome! >>>> >>>> What is the recommended process for handling portmaster on a new system? >>>> I am planning on upgrading a 9.2 system, but I was planning to remove >>>> all ports first, then install pkg and portmaster to install the >>>> remaining packages. Is there some required order to handle this? >>>> >>> >>> Yes. Install pkg first, then portmater, then anything else you may >>> desire. Note that you'll need 'WITH_PKGNG=YES' in /etc/make.conf if you >>> on FreeBSD 9.x (or below) and you are goingto build your own packages >>> rather than using the binary packages from pkg.freebsd.org. >> >> Thanks for the reply, but that is still not clear. You said above that >> portmaster "won't itself install from pkgs", so I am not sure what that >> means. Does that mean that using pkg to install portmaster will work >> properly? I am planning to wait for the release, so hopefully the >> release notes will have good install/upgrade instructions. > > It means the -P or -PP options to portmaster don't do what you expect. Thanks, that clears it up. I just remembered that portmaster is a shell script, so that isn't much of a restriction. -- Carl Johnson carlj@peak.org From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 15 18:54:01 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC52D1F9 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 18:54:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pb0-x22d.google.com (mail-pb0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9956F2DF9 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 18:54:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f45.google.com with SMTP id mc8so3964174pbc.4 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 10:54:01 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id :to:mime-version; bh=qIJAZM5TvDnrkkTN7JbW5PHt27T+Ep+fRnvl4d5RXeo=; b=rVXauU0878lEjCgovly91JyA3oalJbAjqdUnNcsCt9Y4f1TPxOOA7OeoMypWnrnkFE WceJl6iBP7l1/B8cqexzpncOJOBpXUp70N1GdBUFypO/3PPs5X7OfDsds4fyNgzsdG7+ Fr9FZY0e+GEHz4yQqffZjQU+snXn0plCBrI9nbCdM1KonU8pxIRjO2Z1K4QTa51+uRhI ZuYBsZ3klilboW65MzovjFlFKYP6b+Nz64IKsJ6sHHA2110JeF9JaAVd6nopUXMYqnx7 F3PCnO/uDz1nK1DHnz304FEc4Oy9/fuvHE+5WjUs5FsroZfYmXdDnXiS/sDNxdR9/Sro fOjw== X-Received: by 10.66.190.198 with SMTP id gs6mr8217257pac.49.1384541641273; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 10:54:01 -0800 (PST) Received: from briankrusicw.logan.tv ([64.17.255.138]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id oj6sm6854761pab.9.2013.11.15.10.54.00 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 15 Nov 2013 10:54:00 -0800 (PST) From: aurfalien Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: gpart, to -a 4k or to -b 1M Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 10:53:59 -0800 Message-Id: To: FreeBSD Questions Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 18:54:01 -0000 Hi, Curious, for best practice in ensuring 4K alignment, should one do; gpart add ... -b 1M or gpart add ... -a 4k Thank in advance, - aurf From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 15 19:35:02 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: Questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB33813E for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 19:35:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from Phideaux.RawFedDogs.net (Phideaux.RawFedDogs.net [64.251.15.37]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4A38207E for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 19:34:59 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=RawFedDogs.net; s=x; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date; bh=vEFbfglx4ahURODd02AepTKZpJ636BehqeQtzj7+rQE=; b=Z2Vdoh80Ymd3pfpNYmiHfQSCbgJ8FaAX/85ASXopJ8lzrtl/ZfAi5vOfiNufRrmJTIW169rudiGJ2IvdkaConE6+q9pzvF2pY8SG/2PmuO9AJAbfIsKNBRpPJ3LVeDVALDN6uJWHrYsJoWXd6K1BjiJBQIn+r8YURcULoAWUop8=; Received: from cpe-173-175-54-237.hot.res.rr.com ([173.175.54.237] helo=Blaidd-Drwg.RawFedDogs.net) by Phideaux.RawFedDogs.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.80.1 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1VhOiz-000CgA-Fn for Questions@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 13:06:38 -0600 Received: from RawFedDogs.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by Blaidd-Drwg.RawFedDogs.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id F25212058E66 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 13:06:30 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 13:06:30 -0600 From: Kevin Monceaux To: FreeBSD Questions Mailing List Subject: pkgng questions Message-ID: <20131115190630.GA30208@RawFedDogs.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 173.175.54.237 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: Kevin@RawFedDogs.net X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on Phideaux.RawFedDogs.net); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list Reply-To: Kevin@RawFedDogs.net List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 19:35:03 -0000 Fellow FreeBSD Fans, I've been resisting the temptation to switch to pkgngm, mainly waiting for pngng support to be added to xps. But, with the announcement of binary package availability I finally gave pngng a try on a test box. And, I have a few questions. For those who might want to use binary packages only without a local ports tree, could a copy of the /usr/ports/UPDATING file be included in the data received when pkgng updates the repository catalog? If I try to use the pkg updating command without a ports tree I get a "pkg: Unable to open: /usr/ports/UPDATING" error. Speaking of updating the repository catalog, could pkgng be made locale aware so it can spell catalog correctly? It keeps telling me it's updating the repository catalogue, which isn't right for my locale. Is there any way to display info for an uninstalled package, like the info pkg info -f shows for installed package? With that functionality I wouldn't mind living without xps. -- Kevin http://www.RawFedDogs.net http://Lassie.RawFedDogs.net http://www.WacoAgilityGroup.org Bruceville, TX What's the definition of a legacy system? One that works! Errare humanum est, ignoscere caninum. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Nov 15 23:18:48 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 05161F20 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 23:18:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qe0-x229.google.com (mail-qe0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c02::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B274C2B2D for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 23:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qe0-f41.google.com with SMTP id x7so2720355qeu.28 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:18:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:thread-index:content-language; bh=YjnvsKNsdeQvXLqRIF6ArXiqZbDjRDWUEQLNp4RLBDw=; b=PDD9INm8JuPq2PJVJE44H5lIcEEQfUfXQVUqHrc2+zwanJS+37gpGCMsKaFLg+fDYL lMAiJ46og+wM8VG4N7n8XZAV2XbK5xS279fdxQla583VLI5rkT9Q2ljeHKo7xBtDLLmw mZY7fbo71I4938KU4CKOlMvmp0jTaotK2DV34= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=YjnvsKNsdeQvXLqRIF6ArXiqZbDjRDWUEQLNp4RLBDw=; b=beeYZlZNAr+mCHFcg9OMoxaYU1PZ7EgbSH4lmmiIKHTQXxvuBHWyBjVG1+3tke/QZR 73rQ9ZyWuVBb8JFKLpVXxJnI33OTnNJSRty6VNloGF1VExf1InrFRAXgo0JabaW6uQLK 24ghBGcOiAzlvgMRAysC4skfmk1x6X2YKeGZvTqDbAnK8NMcvHW/d9j7si2aX+WPpAt0 ymoJK4Gt7YOCxAqUaL7gP/Hw4TuuJbkqF7lz1LxwzmaMHMIeLFEgHO1R3TkoZwqg6GnU 131tb9+fMnb+OS8Br87T2eITgvccAgCIk8Di8GH2enyWVxghEEnsH/5slQNUcM/nIIMI aj+A== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlhVouYlzy08aLu5ui3eqQT1Vhx30YPo6ix8GmbdXByc6K+HE7TuzGhIRpLDPUBXjiCGgAI X-Received: by 10.49.127.179 with SMTP id nh19mr14708190qeb.1.1384557526572; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:18:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from boss530 (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id h2sm11790411qaf.10.2013.11.15.15.18.45 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 15 Nov 2013 15:18:46 -0800 (PST) From: "Gerard Seibert" To: Subject: GNUPG fails to build on FreeBSD 10.0-BETA3 Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 18:18:43 -0500 Message-ID: <001401cee259$074f0930$15ed1b90$@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-Index: Ac7iWGj1fBIaadopRoOuLf11WWd5hw== Content-Language: en-us Cc: kuriyama@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 23:18:48 -0000 I have tried to build gnupg-2.0.22 on FreeBSD 10.0-BETA3 twice and both = attempts failed. This is a fresh install of FreeBSD on a totally clean = drive. This is the output at the end of the build attempt. checking for LIBFFI... no configure: error: Package requirements (libffi >=3D 3.0.0) were not met: Package libffi was not found in the pkg-config search path. Perhaps you should add the directory containing `libffi.pc' to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable Package 'libffi', required by 'world', not found Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you installed software in a non-standard prefix. Alternatively, you may set the environment variables LIBFFI_CFLAGS and LIBFFI_LIBS to avoid the need to call pkg-config. See the pkg-config man page for more details. =3D=3D=3D> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly. Please run the gnomelogalyzer, available from "http://www.freebsd.org/gnome/gnomelogalyzer.sh", which will diagnose = the problem and suggest a solution. If - and only if - the gnomelogalyzer = cannot solve the problem, report the build failure to the FreeBSD GNOME team at gnome@FreeBSD.org, and attach (a) "/usr/ports/devel/glib20/work/glib-2.36.3/config.log", (b) the output of = the failed make command, and (c) the gnomelogalyzer output. Also, it might = be a good idea to provide an overview of all packages installed on your = system (i.e. an `ls /var/db/pkg`). Put your attachment up on any website, copy-and-paste into http://freebsd-gnome.pastebin.com, or use send-pr(1) = with the attachment. Try to avoid sending any attachments to the mailing list (gnome@FreeBSD.org), because attachments sent to FreeBSD mailing lists = are usually discarded by the mailing list software. *** Error code 1 Stop. make[4]: stopped in /usr/ports/devel/glib20 *** Error code 1 Stop. make[3]: stopped in /usr/ports/devel/qt4-corelib *** Error code 1 Stop. make[2]: stopped in /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/qt4-gui *** Error code 1 Stop. make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/security/pinentry *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/security/gnupg Should I actually download the gnomelogalyzer or is there a simpler way = to get this to work. --=20 Jerry From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 16 00:17:00 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C011E183 for ; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 00:17:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B28D2E8B for ; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 00:17:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rAG0Gxqv036525; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 17:16:59 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id rAG0GwgC036522; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 17:16:59 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 17:16:58 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: aurfalien Subject: Re: gpart, to -a 4k or to -b 1M In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Fri, 15 Nov 2013 17:16:59 -0700 (MST) Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 00:17:00 -0000 On Fri, 15 Nov 2013, aurfalien wrote: > Hi, > > Curious, for best practice in ensuring 4K alignment, should one do; > > gpart add ... -b 1M > > or > > gpart add ... -a 4k > > Thank in advance, They do different things. '-b 1M' starts the added partition at 1M but does not force it to be a multiple of 4K in size. '-a 4k' forces the added partition to start at the next 4K-aligned block, and forces the size to be a multiple of 4K. I recommend both for the first filesystem partition, and '-a 4k' for later ones. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 16 02:56:21 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A0A7DB8; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 02:56:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pa0-x232.google.com (mail-pa0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::232]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E47925FE; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 02:56:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pa0-f50.google.com with SMTP id kp14so2814214pab.9 for ; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 18:56:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :thread-index; bh=piMkAEWDSr3k6QkACvuO1D4+jM55vnU/nBArjnWTKsU=; b=XssvStcoSeInI1Or1c5qUdKUj0tZnmon9Kw9tosAFhXt1GziNnsncSfQ2m/CPl46j7 DveeL2/oVFygfQv6YVfmm1TwCO9g0GH6CMqTAlVKB4v6HhVZHHAicENXvC/H0s0UXl22 L/tRAcwbiBWQbY5tSAbAenZ8e3OE2O7qCq1zHrXeFjxO7GIm1rNMJ9D2CnLmgo7jjhbt TgkVONwQLTb5DgCH6myhvyV39PLW/gxdNGqwHlQzmGm1ySZmcsbsshXw1zctZU9glLhg oP6mNbUhmjjdHx33O9yNIjnmvdS9U079B5Os2UMduRZsz3fv0FFXSA3cZLomjxbDCziJ dA9w== X-Received: by 10.66.190.10 with SMTP id gm10mr9748618pac.126.1384570580616; Fri, 15 Nov 2013 18:56:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from d40 (34.sub-70-197-84.myvzw.com. [70.197.84.34]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id og5sm7668227pbb.10.2013.11.15.18.56.17 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Fri, 15 Nov 2013 18:56:19 -0800 (PST) From: "John Refling" To: , Subject: rare, random issue with read(), mmap() failing to read entire file Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2013 18:56:09 -0800 Message-ID: <9CB46A22C0BE40029652144B2586462A@d40> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-Index: Ac7id2bOvS8Nq/MiRSaxrAx6DDPDxQ== X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.16 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 02:56:21 -0000 I'm having some very insidious issues with copying and verifying (identical) data from several hard disks. This might be a hardware issue or something very deep in the disk / filesystem code. I have verified this with several disks and motherboards. It corrupts 0.0096% of my files, different files each time! Background: 1. I have a 500 GB USB hard disk (the new 4,096 [4k] sector size) which I have been using to store a master archive of over 70,000 files. 2. To make a backup of the USB disk, I copied everything over to a 500 GB SATA hard disk. [Various combinations of `cp -r', `scp -r', `tar -cf - . | rsh ... tar -xf -', etc.] 3. To verify that the copy was correct, I did sha256 sums of all files on both disks. 4. When comparing the sha256 sums on both drives, I discovered that 6 or so files did not compare OK from one drive to the other. 5. When I checked the files individually, the files compared OK, and even when I recomputed their individual sha256 sums, I got DIFFERENT sha256 sums which were correct this time! The above lead me to investigate further, and using ONLY the USB disk, I recomputed the sha256 sums for all files ON THAT DISK. A small number (6-12) of files ON THE SAME DISK had different sha256 sums than previously computed! The disk is read-only so nothing could have changed. To try to get to the bottom of this, I took the sha256 code and put it in my own file reading routine, which reads-in data from the file using read(). On summing up the total bytes read in the read() loop, I discovered that on the files that failed to compare, the read() returned EOF before the actual EOF. According to the manual page this is impossible. I compared the total number of bytes read by the read() loop to the stat() file length value, and they were different! Obviously, the sha256 sum will be different since not all the file is read. This happens consistently on 6 to 12 files out of 70,000+ *every* time, and on DIFFERENT files *every* time. So things work 99.9904% of the time. But something fails 0.0096% (one hundredth of one percent) of the time, which with a large number of files is significant! Instead of read(), I tried mmap()ing chunks of the file. Using mmap() to access the data in the file instead of read() resulted in a (different) sha256 sum than the read() version! The mmap() version was correct, except in ONE case where BOTH versions were WRONG, when compared to a 3rd and 4th run! Using `diff -rq disk1 disk2` resulted in similar issues. There were always a few files that failed to compare. Doing another `diff -rq disk1 disk2` resulted in a few *other* files that failed to compare, while the ones that didn't compare OK the first time, DID compare OK the second time. This happened to 6-12 files out of 70,000+. Whatever is affecting my use of read() in my sha256 routine seems to also affect system utilities such as diff! This gets really insidious because I don't know if the original `cp -r disk1 disk2` did these short reads on a few files while copying the files, thus corrupting my archive backup (on 6-12 files)! Some of the files that fail are small (10KB) and some are huge (8GB). HELP! It takes 7 hours to recompute the sha256 sums of the files on the disk so random experiments are time consuming, but I'm willing to try things that are suggested. System details: This is observed with the following disks: Western Digital 500GB SATA 512 byte sectors Hitachi 500GB SATA 512 byte sectors Iomega RPHD-UG3 500GB USB 4096 byte sectors in combination with these motherboards: P4M800Pro-M V2.0: Pentium D 2.66 GHz, 2GB memory HP/Compaq Evo: Pentium 4, 2.8 GHz, 2GB memory OP System version: Freebsd: 9.1 RELEASE #0 no hardware errors noted in /var/log/messages during the file reading did Spinrite on disks to freshen (re-read/write) all sectors, with no errors. The file systems were built using: dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/xxx bs=2m newfs -m0 /dev/xxx Looked through the mailing lists and bug reports but can't see anything similar. Thanks for your help, John Refling From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 16 05:38:18 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12A16D09 for ; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 05:38:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net [IPv6:2001:44b8:8060:ff02:300:1:6:6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94B1D2DA8 for ; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 05:38:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ppp118-210-21-210.lns20.adl2.internode.on.net (HELO leader.local) ([118.210.21.210]) by ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 16 Nov 2013 16:08:16 +1030 Message-ID: <528704C7.9050103@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 16:08:15 +1030 From: Shane Ambler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Warren Block , aurfalien Subject: Re: gpart, to -a 4k or to -b 1M References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 05:38:18 -0000 On 16/11/2013 10:46, Warren Block wrote: > On Fri, 15 Nov 2013, aurfalien wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Curious, for best practice in ensuring 4K alignment, should one do; >> >> gpart add ... -b 1M >> >> or >> >> gpart add ... -a 4k >> >> Thank in advance, > > They do different things. '-b 1M' starts the added partition at 1M but > does not force it to be a multiple of 4K in size. > > '-a 4k' forces the added partition to start at the next 4K-aligned > block, and forces the size to be a multiple of 4K. > > I recommend both for the first filesystem partition, and '-a 4k' for > later ones. I believe it was related to windows co-existence but I heard a while back that -a 1M is a good option to use. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 16 10:37:53 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 79308339; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 10:37:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from owm.eumx.net (eumx.net [91.82.101.43]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 31CAC297F; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 10:37:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=eumx.net; h=date :message-id:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type; s=default; bh=nENr8d8aDTiOwJEtfV04MW fWmcQ=; b=XNKVLmfJnyrZkL4qYZnGyOnlbIF88RRxJfNPMlGCRyfgfHYx8DTu1K zf4GP402xtXjGo//h+A+gXJxbccKhTTSlFKmLmY+IsR5GGQrRPnN+U3bXdRrGx0t 6pcDVHBqW8l9PvvGXHhLOaQdLzsPX0DYDqIqivU1tpSXJ4IibjXYo= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=eumx.net; h=date:message-id :from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=default; b=aIb6yZDLIGHzxGwtd6B/ytLvnvDJw MbV4Mh2sEJcnZBBOd1cBI6muV23J3kpbK0sEG16MdScVchIJr60YhSZfGDdJGE59 nVM5p5gcz8fnRSeqW4q+Op6X+4KJ89AT1kKJQz+i4rU+CK1EogE9TnC48sWLDlGz IOK8+HYU8tUNuk= Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 11:37:43 +0100 Message-ID: <86iovsaayw.wl%hskuhra@eumx.net> From: "Herbert J. Skuhra" To: "Gerard Seibert" Subject: Re: GNUPG fails to build on FreeBSD 10.0-BETA3 In-Reply-To: <001401cee259$074f0930$15ed1b90$@seibercom.net> References: <001401cee259$074f0930$15ed1b90$@seibercom.net> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) SEMI-EPG/1.14.7 (Harue) FLIM/1.14.9 (=?ISO-8859-4?Q?Goj=F2?=) APEL/10.8 EasyPG/1.0.0 Emacs/24.3.50 (i386-pc-freebsd10.0) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI-EPG 1.14.7 - "Harue") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, kuriyama@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 10:37:53 -0000 On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 18:18:43 -0500 Gerard Seibert wrote: > I have tried to build gnupg-2.0.22 on FreeBSD 10.0-BETA3 twice and > both attempts failed. This is a fresh install of FreeBSD on a > totally clean drive. This is the output at the end of the build > attempt. > > checking for LIBFFI... no > configure: error: Package requirements (libffi >= 3.0.0) were not met: > > Package libffi was not found in the pkg-config search path. > Perhaps you should add the directory containing `libffi.pc' > to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable > Package 'libffi', required by 'world', not found > > Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you > installed software in a non-standard prefix. Subject is wrong! devel/glib20 fails to build, not security/gnupg! Does /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/libffi.pc exist? Have you tried to rebuild devel/libffi? -- Herbert From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 16 12:06:29 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6EFB935 for ; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 12:06:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qe0-x229.google.com (mail-qe0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c02::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8DE372D6E for ; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 12:06:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qe0-f41.google.com with SMTP id x7so2969839qeu.14 for ; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 04:06:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=seibercom.net; s=google; h=reply-to:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:thread-index :content-language; bh=LasqqGCVcZ/raF+fbcUbtdzakyvgf7uuLRrBXkG7eP4=; b=nGh81iIwgEVg6ryX9VAC4hKzXChUdYyNE3kKnW1dpqnSjKzoObdh17EONwhxeryStd Rh+2J9z+tCl3ixRSLJqrPsuGNIGI/on+q6mdsqbr/k6wqgilcW54lpoz+AcCBPYgjkNO uVIpz6AALkQ7eTQRlFngOPmd2kQZE9ObmO+/8= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:reply-to:from:to:cc:references:in-reply-to :subject:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:thread-index:content-language; bh=LasqqGCVcZ/raF+fbcUbtdzakyvgf7uuLRrBXkG7eP4=; b=c7GIUriShMN8wNPJurV4f0J6A7VIWM9MZYqt5KQwv9qGLOkoJlPMeOJFozAgNALUGz wqoy3Xf1+cmcvNgV0d6rO2ukN1ujow7pQtqLhETbeU4EipNgBts5Lyl5la8vkCW6jrQ+ ZwsPUg2bXJ8mORZ/eyECryKEmx20P6qVGRfJ36YKZuQjX32Oz3OyR3cG9kY5OeGRgUgj W4HFxt6JfQfvt4OwMsAus7yBJxH8yhkMlhApTCBfbRNRmHsXtgvMuTVQ82BHhPYdgQ2I Q29VGR1+CZjSIB4Rg0YVip58ciDnopHXrfSJpqJ3kzdqf2J53Ui3JuAnDDvrwPIbbiDN tkCQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn0QBEEPKWgMsCREDL7YN5P4TdrnTWKl3TWIzOWuDnOsH60bmuf6hMaUyDdUN1vm2KKKlXF X-Received: by 10.49.51.103 with SMTP id j7mr18190518qeo.29.1384603587552; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 04:06:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from boss530 (cpe-076-182-104-150.nc.res.rr.com. [76.182.104.150]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id n7sm17451932qai.1.2013.11.16.04.06.26 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Sat, 16 Nov 2013 04:06:27 -0800 (PST) From: "Gerard Seibert" To: References: <001401cee259$074f0930$15ed1b90$@seibercom.net> <86iovsaayw.wl%hskuhra@eumx.net> In-Reply-To: <86iovsaayw.wl%hskuhra@eumx.net> Subject: RE: GNUPG fails to build on FreeBSD 10.0-BETA3 Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 07:06:23 -0500 Message-ID: <004501cee2c4$45339980$cf9acc80$@seibercom.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-Index: AQFi+hUlAz5W0MMc6kr5PlpJQLwWLAGj9JwPAbNSfM4= Content-Language: en-us Cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org, "'Herbert J. Skuhra'" , kuriyama@FreeBSD.org, zeising@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 12:06:29 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: Herbert J. Skuhra [mailto:hskuhra@eumx.net] > Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2013 5:38 AM > To: Gerard Seibert > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; kuriyama@FreeBSD.org > Subject: Re: GNUPG fails to build on FreeBSD 10.0-BETA3 > > On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 18:18:43 -0500 > Gerard Seibert wrote: > > > I have tried to build gnupg-2.0.22 on FreeBSD 10.0-BETA3 twice and > > both attempts failed. This is a fresh install of FreeBSD on a = totally > > clean drive. This is the output at the end of the build attempt. > > > > checking for LIBFFI... no > > configure: error: Package requirements (libffi >=3D 3.0.0) were not = met: > > > > Package libffi was not found in the pkg-config search path. > > Perhaps you should add the directory containing `libffi.pc' > > to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable Package 'libffi', = required > > by 'world', not found > > > > Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you > > installed software in a non-standard prefix. > > Subject is wrong! devel/glib20 fails to build, not security/gnupg! > > Does /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/libffi.pc exist? > Have you tried to rebuild devel/libffi? Okay, "libffi.pc" did not exist. "devel/glib20" was failing to build and = then subsequently "/security/gnupg" due to this fact. I built = "devel/libffi"=20 and then preceded to building "gnupg". It is building now and appears to = be going well. Obviously, there is a dependency problem. Now, should I file a PR and = if so, against which port? Since "devel/glib20" was not pulling in = "libffi" I would assume "glib20" is the port to report. Thanks for your assistance. --=20 Jerry From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 16 14:05:14 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4B621DD for ; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 14:05:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A4B622A5 for ; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 14:05:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id rAGE57Sm041807; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 07:05:07 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id rAGE57l5041804; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 07:05:07 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 07:05:07 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Shane Ambler Subject: Re: gpart, to -a 4k or to -b 1M In-Reply-To: <528704C7.9050103@ShaneWare.Biz> Message-ID: References: <528704C7.9050103@ShaneWare.Biz> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 16 Nov 2013 07:05:07 -0700 (MST) Cc: FreeBSD Questions , aurfalien X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 14:05:14 -0000 On Sat, 16 Nov 2013, Shane Ambler wrote: > On 16/11/2013 10:46, Warren Block wrote: >> On Fri, 15 Nov 2013, aurfalien wrote: >>> >>> Curious, for best practice in ensuring 4K alignment, should one do; >>> >>> gpart add ... -b 1M >>> >>> or >>> >>> gpart add ... -a 4k >>> >>> Thank in advance, >> >> They do different things. '-b 1M' starts the added partition at 1M but >> does not force it to be a multiple of 4K in size. >> >> '-a 4k' forces the added partition to start at the next 4K-aligned >> block, and forces the size to be a multiple of 4K. >> >> I recommend both for the first filesystem partition, and '-a 4k' for >> later ones. > > I believe it was related to windows co-existence but I heard a while > back that -a 1M is a good option to use. It doesn't hurt anything. By rounding both starting location and length to 1M multiples, it still forces 4K alignment. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 16 19:17:29 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42DF9344 for ; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 19:17:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com (mail-wi0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7A152098 for ; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 19:17:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id ey16so2316075wid.12 for ; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 11:17:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=xFYksd78k2vscIL0tEXlRCgUwxXXHcXT9AUGqSyVRTo=; b=Vxx76wi1ZBIbbTUbcNe1o4l6zdS2+0JhAWxP/o5qLBq0o7hOKJTlbljIKjBzWFEm2f EVOvcS5vvLYhWt4BfTsyL3yxVA6DpxlBNKU26H8CHqX7vq9v0vMvq7eW6hwE6b97Grgt KmdHE9D0DvCmyYTqpeoP4BjtmsANTbpzdzocIA7ArEqmilRSXqeW4K7yJThfjBJEi3P7 Nz6MCnk0XKAvUC0posLl+k1g/Kn6I+15/1jiyK3Kcl83OQIthTYl1B9pz3eO+IylaAdU EWB9F18fti2N3QzlmZ5gHPSD1RtaIYT9UmF54stqI1HhcGCeD0zxIfTU9v+xa5Vt4/zn njOQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.80.163 with SMTP id s3mr11444873wix.51.1384629447346; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 11:17:27 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.21.208 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 11:17:27 -0800 (PST) Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2013 02:17:27 +0700 Message-ID: Subject: Installing Java without enter FreeBSD Jail From: Hung Son Nguyen To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.16 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 19:17:29 -0000 Hi, I plan to write a script that automatically create FreeBSD Jail with Java installed. But I have problem when installing java. As I found on the internet, I have to install java using port collection, but how can I use port collection to install software without enter the Jail? Do we have another way to install java on FreeBSD? Many thanks, --=20 * Nguy=E1=BB=85n H=C3=B9ng S=C6=A1n* --- University of Information Technology - VNU HCMC --- Phone: (+84) 1689 975 376 --- Yahoo: nguyensonuit --- Skype: nguyensonuit From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 16 21:14:17 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DB2C6A6; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 21:14:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from fep13.mx.upcmail.net (fep13.mx.upcmail.net [62.179.121.33]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35BFB259E; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 21:14:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from edge03.upcmail.net ([192.168.13.238]) by viefep13-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.8.01.05.05 201-2260-151-110-20120111) with ESMTP id <20131116211415.OCY4248.viefep13-int.chello.at@edge03.upcmail.net>; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 22:14:15 +0100 Received: from [127.0.0.1] ([178.84.132.32]) by edge03.upcmail.net with edge id qME31m01L0i5fp603ME3uB; Sat, 16 Nov 2013 22:14:04 +0100 X-SourceIP: 178.84.132.32 Message-ID: <5287E018.9020701@rainbow-runner.nl> Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 22:14:00 +0100 From: Koop Mast User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: GNUPG fails to build on FreeBSD 10.0-BETA3 References: <001401cee259$074f0930$15ed1b90$@seibercom.net> <86iovsaayw.wl%hskuhra@eumx.net> <004501cee2c4$45339980$cf9acc80$@seibercom.net> In-Reply-To: <004501cee2c4$45339980$cf9acc80$@seibercom.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 131116-0, 16-11-2013), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Cc: gnome@FreeBSD.org, "'Herbert J. Skuhra'" , kuriyama@FreeBSD.org, zeising@FreeBSD.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.16 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 21:14:17 -0000 On 16-11-2013 13:06, Gerard Seibert wrote: >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Herbert J. Skuhra [mailto:hskuhra@eumx.net] >> Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2013 5:38 AM >> To: Gerard Seibert >> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; kuriyama@FreeBSD.org >> Subject: Re: GNUPG fails to build on FreeBSD 10.0-BETA3 >> >> On Fri, 15 Nov 2013 18:18:43 -0500 >> Gerard Seibert wrote: >> >>> I have tried to build gnupg-2.0.22 on FreeBSD 10.0-BETA3 twice and >>> both attempts failed. This is a fresh install of FreeBSD on a totally >>> clean drive. This is the output at the end of the build attempt. >>> >>> checking for LIBFFI... no >>> configure: error: Package requirements (libffi >= 3.0.0) were not met: >>> >>> Package libffi was not found in the pkg-config search path. >>> Perhaps you should add the directory containing `libffi.pc' >>> to the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable Package 'libffi', required >>> by 'world', not found >>> >>> Consider adjusting the PKG_CONFIG_PATH environment variable if you >>> installed software in a non-standard prefix. >> Subject is wrong! devel/glib20 fails to build, not security/gnupg! >> >> Does /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig/libffi.pc exist? >> Have you tried to rebuild devel/libffi? > Okay, "libffi.pc" did not exist. "devel/glib20" was failing to build and > then subsequently "/security/gnupg" due to this fact. I built "devel/libffi" > and then preceded to building "gnupg". It is building now and appears to be going well. > > Obviously, there is a dependency problem. Now, should I file a PR and if so, against which port? Since "devel/glib20" was not pulling in "libffi" I would assume "glib20" is the port to report. > > Thanks for your assistance. > Like the PR stated, the problem is why it didn't find libffi. So libffi.pc doesn't excists glib20 doesn't know where to find it. So the next question would be why isn't libffi.pc there. Did you try Herbert's suggestion of rebuilding libffi? -Koop --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com