From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 1 00:33:48 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D0DEACF for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 00:33:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-x22f.google.com (mail-qc0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D0E9B1D18 for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 00:33:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f175.google.com with SMTP id e9so12236112qcy.6 for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2013 16:33:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ZfpkPQAvV3b4lm9ETJMTk5C5hLjNHTZy3EjkylK7cWQ=; b=dOc5rj8u/tN6xICT47vyD8DiEx5MP3FsXjiAal4o7pxvOHjfxputk7C7orop8sSmIR VMZzcUpmimCvfHB+V4ciV2j8PFyVSdWBPCGuTqnXLjHLDP7S8LH+0ZZ1S7DCLV9tcp+X vudo+mGsYNIbruMPnUSGnnJxQbhGN6OkiQObdmR30dXzDhWAmCsZS15yQfN3acpj6hed n9Du4+dg0yaBCndIQiyvEwDYCSelkcInmbdVEbV8ru59zxjYiJ3vk5z+jAQgLz/ONIBG FK/2J/qMPTI9Y6uhTPWeiK4ihQAZuntahAb8+N7WIlpT/jPoMu8VGWnRG+nFRtf1hBx1 j/QQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.229.53.68 with SMTP id l4mr121900612qcg.21.1388536427008; Tue, 31 Dec 2013 16:33:47 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.224.52.8 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Dec 2013 16:33:46 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52BEC7F6.6070509@gmail.com> References: <52BEC7F6.6070509@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2013 16:33:46 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: PYnbqiox16Q5inglRI3ZnzOS_SY Message-ID: Subject: Re: Font smudges when libreoffice dependencies are installed From: Adrian Chadd To: David Demelier Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: FreeBSD questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2014 00:33:48 -0000 Hi, On 28 December 2013 04:45, David Demelier wrote: > Hello folks, > > When I install libreoffice, some fonts are also installed. I don't know > which ones, but it produces a lot of smudges in thunderbird and / or > firefox. You mean the screen artifacts where it's supposed to be rendering text? -a > See the screenshot : > > http://www.demelierdavid.fr/files/Smudges.png > > It usually appears when loading a new tab or something similar and > disappear when you scroll a bit. It's quite annoying and I can't find > any solution.. > > I think the problem stays at the fontconfig, maybe conflicts? I'm using > almost defaults. > > Cheers, > David Demelier > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 1 02:06:01 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9D0DA81 for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 02:06:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 557591499 for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 02:06:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id s0125rdv002112 for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2013 19:05:53 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <52C37801.8010001@dreamchaser.org> Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2013 19:05:53 -0700 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130730 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: updating /sys/sys Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Tue, 31 Dec 2013 19:05:53 -0700 (MST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2014 02:06:01 -0000 I just used freebsd-update to upgrade from 9.1 to 9.2. Everything seemed to go properly, but if I look at /sys/sys all of the .h files say something like: * $FreeBSD: release/9.0.0/sys/sys/cons.h 196506 2009-08-24 10:53:30Z ed $ /etc/freebsd-update looks like: ... Components src world kernel IgnorePaths ... Why aren't they updated? What's the best way to get them updated? Thanks, Gary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 1 03:48:07 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC7582E1 for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 03:48:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alogt.com (alogt.com [69.36.191.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 96AFC1080 for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 03:48:07 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alogt.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=mfQVMoBsUDPGZqxEXdguM8f6iefecTuBZTfs3iMHdv8=; b=N6TFDG3oq2sB7xp5m3PfvZqBKH0AX3wg0bL5CIkcREz5MCfIfskV2CvIdFU4CecrW39bEKAXzjLBBCDbPAso4iOJnU5jEQVqy8izCBcCBDqpsT8NohkXu2gtEK7YbKRUGo96aOMbCJkPhtuS/WQVJx36OyDbD405LWrddv71utU=; Received: from [120.165.140.228] (port=43273 helo=X220.alogt.com) by sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net with esmtpsa (SSLv3:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1VyCmm-002fd7-Dy; Tue, 31 Dec 2013 20:48:01 -0700 Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2014 11:47:45 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org Subject: Re: updating /sys/sys Message-ID: <20140101114745.3a3e37fb@X220.alogt.com> In-Reply-To: <52C37801.8010001@dreamchaser.org> References: <52C37801.8010001@dreamchaser.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - alogt.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: authenticated_id: erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2014 03:48:07 -0000 Hi, On Tue, 31 Dec 2013 19:05:53 -0700 Gary Aitken wrote: > I just used freebsd-update to upgrade from 9.1 to 9.2. > Everything seemed to go properly, > but if I look at /sys/sys > all of the .h files say something like: > * $FreeBSD: release/9.0.0/sys/sys/cons.h 196506 2009-08-24 > 10:53:30Z ed $ > > /etc/freebsd-update looks like: > > ... > Components src world kernel > IgnorePaths > ... > > Why aren't they updated? why should they? They define the 'interface' to the implementation. It is most important that these interfaces do change as little as possible especially in a STABLE version. They can change when you update to 10 and they can change all the while on CURRENT but not on RELEASE versions like 8 and 9. > What's the best way to get them updated? You should have the current version if nothing is mentioned in UPDATING. Erich From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 1 07:25:55 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE2AE1AC for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 07:25:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x235.google.com (mail-ie0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 870FE1FBE for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 07:25:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f181.google.com with SMTP id e14so13865941iej.12 for ; Tue, 31 Dec 2013 23:25:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=cQlkDZxPhJLh4TnVCli1gqlzJ7ziHoRpNazicTcdqrw=; b=qx/M+i1lxIBAfQFjL8tnJcxpW5KZETHHPbpqFsYMiMwcXO/gGlzR0aEs7KEmoXr4Hj Lefj0AuOCFMZ4mGqJXaRUMxHXUpU19ye5VONT0+rDdH1PLnIvchIW0CEbaSB9Vy7rsTJ ZY1yYrWn+2ngBvmugNc4GonPrmUsIpgqGyipRLcbbtGgoJ1D5v7hSpS3y0EdzXn8q38l n7Y8gaWZ+b5D8O+mDpsuVV77ehad09gi7eKuloa+fZ39y2eVB5fg8Y85g8n1FAoEJtOP h8HF8Y9K9RTS532JNvKDYBjKNFoGZfppdvEHXaIp8q2lzUVWOAr+7/UOOErDL5IcH+at v4qw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.42.147.66 with SMTP id m2mr10634129icv.59.1388561154898; Tue, 31 Dec 2013 23:25:54 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.89.136 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Dec 2013 23:25:54 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2013 23:25:54 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: uname -r: release level From: Chris Stankevitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2014 07:25:55 -0000 Hi, I just setup my freebsd machine and performed a "freebsd-update fetch install" which leads me to believe I am now running 9.2-RELEASE-p2. Of course I wanted to see for myself using "uname -r" which reports my "release level". "uname -r" is reporting 9.2-RELEASE which is not quite what I was expecting (I was expecting a p2 suffix). That doesn't interest me too much, but this does: By what mechanism does "uname -r" determine my "release level"? Thank you, Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 1 07:38:22 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B407F2BF for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 07:38:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7596A1089 for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 07:38:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-149-155.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.149.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 43AD33CCFD; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 08:38:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s017boRe002088; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 08:37:50 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2014 08:37:50 +0100 From: Polytropon To: Chris Stankevitz Subject: Re: uname -r: release level Message-Id: <20140101083750.3a3f6c7c.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2014 07:38:22 -0000 On Tue, 31 Dec 2013 23:25:54 -0800, Chris Stankevitz wrote: > Hi, > > I just setup my freebsd machine and performed a "freebsd-update fetch > install" which leads me to believe I am now running 9.2-RELEASE-p2. > Of course I wanted to see for myself using "uname -r" which reports my > "release level". > > "uname -r" is reporting 9.2-RELEASE which is not quite what I was > expecting (I was expecting a p2 suffix). That's a very assumptive expectation. :-) > That doesn't interest me too > much, but this does: > > By what mechanism does "uname -r" determine my "release level"? The information is obtained from the running kernel. If an update (towards a higher patchlevel) did not involve a _kernel_ update, this particular information will NOT change. -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ... From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 1 08:04:48 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 650BD297 for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 08:04:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A7661242 for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 08:04:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id s0184eve002994; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 01:04:41 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <52C3CC18.30407@dreamchaser.org> Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2014 01:04:40 -0700 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130730 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Erich Dollansky Subject: Re: updating /sys/sys References: <52C37801.8010001@dreamchaser.org> <20140101114745.3a3e37fb@X220.alogt.com> In-Reply-To: <20140101114745.3a3e37fb@X220.alogt.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Wed, 01 Jan 2014 01:04:41 -0700 (MST) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2014 08:04:48 -0000 On 12/31/13 20:47, Erich Dollansky wrote: >> I just used freebsd-update to upgrade from 9.1 to 9.2. Everything >> seemed to go properly, but if I look at /sys/sys all of the .h >> files say something like: * $FreeBSD: release/9.0.0/sys/sys/cons.h >> 196506 2009-08-24 10:53:30Z ed $ >> >> /etc/freebsd-update looks like: >> >> ... Components src world kernel IgnorePaths ... >> >> Why aren't they updated? > > why should they? They define the 'interface' to the implementation. > It is most important that these interfaces do change as little as > possible especially in a STABLE version. If I think about it, it seems that what you say should be the case. However, if you download the src tarball and do some diffs, you will see that many of them are in fact different; how significant those differences are, I'm not sure. I hit this problem trying to build sysutils/lsof quite a while ago. It still doesn't build for me after upgrading to 9.2. > They can change when you update to 10 and they can change all the > while on CURRENT but not on RELEASE versions like 8 and 9. Maybe that *should* be the situation, but it is not in actuality. >> What's the best way to get them updated? > > You should have the current version if nothing is mentioned in > UPDATING. I ended up getting them via the src.txz tarball: ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/amd64/9.2-RELEASE/ Moving the 9.0 /usr/src/sys/sys directory to the side and symlinking to the usr/src/sys/sys directory from the 9.2 tarball allows it to compile. Gary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 1 10:42:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 731C874E for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 10:42:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alogt.com (alogt.com [69.36.191.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49ECE1C9E for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 10:42:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alogt.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=HpdMZdqm2XMk8gHhEW3sMVx/jXl5lKdJFfAGK+udLh8=; b=fGzNEyc/lPFhjowLTBi3OXiOYEWhrX3CSExkibnxgHER87J2SD7h08tJaekO0/1LrnaZwcfR3FPYWnsjDf4ur29xRPFs4Z5K2BSIht81+5Mubh4cYe9obLgCzW1gZiibxyNChdIn4Tiv8MHlxO3IrZvQnKksf7x1nebxFss9dCI=; Received: from [120.180.127.147] (port=56349 helo=X220.alogt.com) by sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net with esmtpsa (SSLv3:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1VyJFZ-000Q6J-JU; Wed, 01 Jan 2014 03:42:10 -0700 Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2014 18:41:42 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org Subject: Re: updating /sys/sys Message-ID: <20140101184142.5f11b3f6@X220.alogt.com> In-Reply-To: <52C3CC18.30407@dreamchaser.org> References: <52C37801.8010001@dreamchaser.org> <20140101114745.3a3e37fb@X220.alogt.com> <52C3CC18.30407@dreamchaser.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - alogt.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: authenticated_id: erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2014 10:42:11 -0000 Hi, On Wed, 01 Jan 2014 01:04:40 -0700 Gary Aitken wrote: > On 12/31/13 20:47, Erich Dollansky wrote: > > >> I just used freebsd-update to upgrade from 9.1 to 9.2. Everything > >> seemed to go properly, but if I look at /sys/sys all of the .h > >> files say something like: * $FreeBSD: release/9.0.0/sys/sys/cons.h > >> 196506 2009-08-24 10:53:30Z ed $ > >> > >> /etc/freebsd-update looks like: > >> > >> ... Components src world kernel IgnorePaths ... > >> > >> Why aren't they updated? > > > > why should they? They define the 'interface' to the implementation. > > It is most important that these interfaces do change as little as > > possible especially in a STABLE version. > > If I think about it, it seems that what you say should be the case. > However, if you download the src tarball and do some diffs, you will > see that many of them are in fact different; how significant those > differences are, I'm not sure. I hit this problem trying to build > sysutils/lsof quite a while ago. It still doesn't build for me after > upgrading to 9.2. I never used a 9.X, so I do not know. If .h files are changed - I mean not just the comments - it is not possible to run old binaries from the version before. But binaries from 9.0 should run on 9.2. > > > They can change when you update to 10 and they can change all the > > while on CURRENT but not on RELEASE versions like 8 and 9. > > Maybe that *should* be the situation, but it is not in actuality. It happens for parts which under development. > > >> What's the best way to get them updated? > > > > You should have the current version if nothing is mentioned in > > UPDATING. > > I ended up getting them via the src.txz tarball: > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/amd64/9.2-RELEASE/ > > Moving the 9.0 /usr/src/sys/sys directory to the side and symlinking > to the usr/src/sys/sys directory from the 9.2 tarball allows it to > compile. Sounds strange. Every RELEASE must compile. At least the world has to compile. It is a different story for a custom build kernel. There is the chance that you select a combination of options which will not result in a working kernel. Sometimes, this is documented, sometimes, it is not. Erich > > Gary > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 1 15:57:42 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D6077CD for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 15:57:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qa0-f49.google.com (mail-qa0-f49.google.com [209.85.216.49]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 362A21FE1 for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 15:57:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id ii20so12601242qab.1 for ; Wed, 01 Jan 2014 07:57:35 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to :cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=j0DqZwPSI/wyJ3Qh+DiPGbskUHUgMLGfM3K52Xzs8Pk=; b=OxGnyzbErPJvPSprdi4w+PbzoiapqVEg/LMqFFrvXQ7hVzy9Mof8Xhe3vbq8hMtwI9 01+8bjbBll1YK1Ib+Qwn3JDiIb3K6KkXLTiidCuvV+PjIH0JKBl68qsF1Vty8TucU4Ub OErFJYtZ+WH+evMcGjTPmPWx8pnWjXgddawHkCZbA1X9WTK/zjmSkEGa9gy7LJzza2Xk k9S0Y9/+BQe2plg1IhjDm9oMXRgmX9Nnmj0NTPGlFLTk5IT9whKpJSdBcDJqCsb2qAGG KeqCK9m/nw0PTUJJyNLN80HlubqFtSurzfUQzv/zGrnnWL8c0XBFWeUNADKqBJnRbRTP /8OQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlxwuzU6ysXPnyRrahVGtLgU1MxC15eVlblW1V8qjlHrOT/ZMZ+bRm3t52mR5N/kmo1CMt0 X-Received: by 10.229.222.194 with SMTP id ih2mr128675270qcb.16.1388591427688; Wed, 01 Jan 2014 07:50:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (pool-96-225-163-50.nrflva.fios.verizon.net. [96.225.163.50]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id hb2sm80101518qeb.6.2014.01.01.07.50.26 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Jan 2014 07:50:27 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52C43942.2020708@ohlste.in> Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2014 10:50:26 -0500 From: Jim Ohlstein User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Chris Stankevitz Subject: Re: uname -r: release level References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2014 15:57:42 -0000 On 1/1/14, 2:25 AM, Chris Stankevitz wrote: > Hi, > > I just setup my freebsd machine and performed a "freebsd-update fetch > install" which leads me to believe I am now running 9.2-RELEASE-p2. > Of course I wanted to see for myself using "uname -r" which reports my > "release level". Looking at http://www.freebsd.org/security/ it seems FreeBSD-9.2 was released on 9/30/2013. According to http://www.freebsd.org/security/advisories.html there was only one security advisory since then, on 11/19/2013 - http://www.freebsd.org/security/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-13:14.openssh.asc. That only affected users of the 10 branch. The p1 and p2 patch levels were applied to the 9.2 RC's only, so far as I can see at http://www.freebsd.org/security/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-13:12.ifioctl.asc and http://www.freebsd.org/security/advisories/FreeBSD-SA-13:13.nullfs.asc. > > "uname -r" is reporting 9.2-RELEASE which is not quite what I was > expecting (I was expecting a p2 suffix). That doesn't interest me too > much, but this does: > > By what mechanism does "uname -r" determine my "release level"? sysctl kern.osrelease # ktrace -ty uname -r ... # kdump 75158 uname SCTL "kern.osrelease" # ktrace -ty uname -a ... # kdump 75215 uname SCTL "kern.ostype" 75215 uname SCTL "kern.hostname" 75215 uname SCTL "kern.osrelease" 75215 uname SCTL "kern.version" 75215 uname SCTL "hw.machine" > > Thank you, > > Chris > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > -- Jim Ohlstein From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 1 18:06:34 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59BF9BDB for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 18:06:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C2051849 for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 18:06:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id s01HeV9Y004795; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 10:40:31 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <52C4530F.3070405@dreamchaser.org> Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2014 10:40:31 -0700 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130730 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Erich Dollansky Subject: Re: updating /sys/sys References: <52C37801.8010001@dreamchaser.org> <20140101114745.3a3e37fb@X220.alogt.com> <52C3CC18.30407@dreamchaser.org> <20140101184142.5f11b3f6@X220.alogt.com> In-Reply-To: <20140101184142.5f11b3f6@X220.alogt.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Wed, 01 Jan 2014 10:40:32 -0700 (MST) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2014 18:06:34 -0000 On 01/01/14 03:41, Erich Dollansky wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, 01 Jan 2014 01:04:40 -0700 > Gary Aitken wrote: > >> On 12/31/13 20:47, Erich Dollansky wrote: >> >>>> I just used freebsd-update to upgrade from 9.1 to 9.2. Everything >>>> seemed to go properly, but if I look at /sys/sys all of the .h >>>> files say something like: * $FreeBSD: release/9.0.0/sys/sys/cons.h >>>> 196506 2009-08-24 10:53:30Z ed $ >>>> >>>> /etc/freebsd-update looks like: >>>> >>>> ... Components src world kernel IgnorePaths ... >>>> >>>> Why aren't they updated? >>> >>> why should they? They define the 'interface' to the implementation. >>> It is most important that these interfaces do change as little as >>> possible especially in a STABLE version. >> >> If I think about it, it seems that what you say should be the case. >> However, if you download the src tarball and do some diffs, you will >> see that many of them are in fact different; how significant those >> differences are, I'm not sure. I hit this problem trying to build >> sysutils/lsof quite a while ago. It still doesn't build for me after >> upgrading to 9.2. > > I never used a 9.X, so I do not know. If .h files are changed - I mean > not just the comments - it is not possible to run old binaries from the > version before. But binaries from 9.0 should run on 9.2. >> >>> They can change when you update to 10 and they can change all the >>> while on CURRENT but not on RELEASE versions like 8 and 9. >> >> Maybe that *should* be the situation, but it is not in actuality. > > It happens for parts which under development. >> >>>> What's the best way to get them updated? >>> >>> You should have the current version if nothing is mentioned in >>> UPDATING. >> >> I ended up getting them via the src.txz tarball: >> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/amd64/9.2-RELEASE/ >> >> Moving the 9.0 /usr/src/sys/sys directory to the side and symlinking >> to the usr/src/sys/sys directory from the 9.2 tarball allows it to >> compile. > > Sounds strange. Every RELEASE must compile. At least the world has to > compile. It is a different story for a custom build kernel. There is > the chance that you select a combination of options which will not > result in a working kernel. Sometimes, this is documented, sometimes, > it is not. The release compiles with it's own (9.2-RELEASE) /usr/src/sys/sys. The problem is that /usr/src is not updated under some conditions, apparently, when freebsd-update is run, even if freebsd-update includes "src" in the "Components" line. Hmmm. When I first installed 9.0, I don't think I had any source installed, but /usr/src/sys is part of the base install. This would be consistent with the state of my system, which has a stubbed out directory tree for everything in /usr/src except for /usr/src/sys. The default for "StrictComponents" is no, and when it goes to determine whether or not to update it makes the decision based on whether or not more than 50% of the files that are supposed to be there are actually there. I suspect the whole of src is considerably more than double /usr/src/sys, so it would decide not to update. Unfortunately, it is not possible to rerun freebsd-update on the same version to correct a problem such as this. I am not sure whether /usr/src/sys is considered part of the "world" or "kernel" components or not; if it is not, then the above would explain the behavior. If it is considered part of "world" or "kernel", then it would not explain it. Gary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 1 18:14:31 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00AF6D13 for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 18:14:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ie0-x22a.google.com (mail-ie0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C53E218E7 for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 18:14:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ie0-f170.google.com with SMTP id qd12so14088039ieb.15 for ; Wed, 01 Jan 2014 10:14:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=lP7yFZ+ruKvdz0Qb/v8g9o83U6AWs5kJbVfU/mGJHJU=; b=kNYcKBl+hGLHKZmBM6omYTJqu7qLfInKAMdOmHzaVTEQII5Fa9B/CQWwZz1/xJCTT0 b3lmqwjlOmpta+I4gXsDrlkUaYi/P9DIfSEJBw9OVuO5sqI7webCWI+jcPxfFGjGKCBk Th+bLZTyncX+qCKzgVHjrqlLsjG1dxcAxDd5H+f92/mrUZdDk4pipEvvbXNm88FYqtqR 1EAXNYqj5ZzkAeQ6hqUHfjrHus/63mKoKuDLKr+fTGU3V/MQFcoWsDrpJh/GvDoqXRJA LgM1iIglHvgx7xVHWiIXFpYytPvAdQg0ML8a1Xb+XO8uEHvySPOx7dv57o4r/9puEMff T5eg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.141.133 with SMTP id ro5mr66616171igb.35.1388600070119; Wed, 01 Jan 2014 10:14:30 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.42.89.136 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 10:14:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2014 10:14:30 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: uname -r: release level From: Chris Stankevitz To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2014 18:14:31 -0000 On Tue, Dec 31, 2013 at 11:25 PM, Chris Stankevitz wrote: > By what mechanism does "uname -r" determine my "release level"? Some follow-up questions: - What is the term that people use in conversation for the "freebsd-update version number" (e.g. 9.2-RELEASE-p2) - What is the term that people use in conversation for the "sysctl kern.osrelease version number" (e.g. 9.2-RELEASE) reported by uname? - How can I determine which "freebsd-update version number" I am running? - Is it possible for two computers to have the same "world" but different "freebsd-update" version numbers? For example when comparing an up-to-date 9.2-RC1 machine to an up-to-date 9.2-RELEASE machine? - When freebsd-update modifies the kernel in response to a security advisory, does the "sysctl kern.osrelease version number" change? If so, does the "sysctl kern.osrelease version number" then match the "freebsd-update version number"? - Are there other version numbers that describe the "FreeBSD Version" that I am running? Thank you! Chris From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 1 18:52:48 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D7651C8 for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 18:52:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-ve0-x231.google.com (mail-ve0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 168941B2E for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 18:52:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-ve0-f177.google.com with SMTP id db12so6758733veb.8 for ; Wed, 01 Jan 2014 10:52:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=YnmuTsNWfbhaglKJVA2AIWGwDuzr4UhwSR2lQqvQjQU=; b=W6TFOE0NQYeGetExArjiOTyja+UEHUeRKYyyRRsuQ667wzbjPghTqSgAu6AHLd0Tab JeqaYXz0XuVOEDn/SsHtYE9xd0uNQ254ntMTWar8BBnnl0p+HkWoMQ8N4U+nwJxGqGcZ R/UxhbWUteIINAiW5BWAMifNej8xH7gTxASBrQ57HhKyUe5P6GBzVETBvCpfzau7bIjs isFLk9NKh8wpQ53ImNjG+rRMSa2DncO3LVWQndg8udoBlVGRbwPtRkvPqBjS4g9GVIm9 Y6k7zWy0m3JdOLt/kReqy4ByTrO0h6eYyndgR9x5ZkX9yqTceXst79i0ncgifdJvYy7Q 4V+Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.52.96.99 with SMTP id dr3mr1061094vdb.69.1388602367151; Wed, 01 Jan 2014 10:52:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.162.232 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 10:52:47 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.58.162.232 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 10:52:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <52c01506.Dih5U63zPRUKn60m%davidcollins001@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2014 18:52:47 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Xorg not working with radeon on 10 stable From: David Collins To: Warren Block Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: davidcollins001@gmail.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2014 18:52:48 -0000 On 30 Dec 2013 01:18, "David Collins" wrote: > > > I did a similar upgrade recently also. > > > >> I have a Radeon HD 2400 PRO/XT, which supported from whats in the log > >> file. The user is as member of the dri group. I load the radeonkms > >> kernel module on boot. > > > > > > That is not necessary, and causes problems for some. > > Noted, will remove. Removed, and the modules get loaded automatically. > > >> When try to start X (same xorg.conf file that > >> worked previously or with newly created xorg.conf) the xserver gives > >> me a black screen which I can't do anything with, I am also unable to > >> switch virtual terminals. > > > > > > This is a known problem with the KMS drivers. The new console drivers fix this, hopefully to be MFCed soon after 10.0-RELEASE. > > Brilliant, I look forward to this > > >> I can ssh in to get access. My make.conf, xorg.conf and Xorg log file are below but the bits that look suspect are: > > > > > >> [ 127.760] (II) AIGLX: Screen 0 is not DRI2 capable > >> [ 128.363] (EE) AIGLX error: r600 does not export required DRI extension > > > > > >> I have found a number of reports of this with linux but no solutions > >> that I have been able to use. Does anyone have any idea how to solve > >> this? > > > > > > Use the ati or radeon driver, not radeonhd, which is obsolete. > > I tried the ati driver (with updated xorg.conf) from ports but i don't think it worked either. I won't have access to my computer for a couple days but when I do I will try again. > I replaced radeonhd with radeon in xorg.conf. I didn't realise this driver was provided the ati port. Everything is working perfectly now, Thanks. David From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 1 19:46:32 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBAE2E6A; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 19:46:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-we0-x22c.google.com (mail-we0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E0F21F83; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 19:46:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-we0-f172.google.com with SMTP id p61so12080405wes.3 for ; Wed, 01 Jan 2014 11:46:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=lDsvaOmdDlTT7Zu70Hmm1B88RyuMxbCGdzfQgKrRJKY=; b=rmKnGWV1yonxrZPAGut7Rk2od3W0wUKox+o91LSwKrNS4XkC8o5ix20ey3bQg07iJf 0k2a2kjHh+BoU6rzpMhZJ0oqHUJkJ1m4I8GHPNZ0QAlo5UFyjdi0mOcVl2o/blnGL/Nc iuhUyDSNMh8hywfg/oTYD5hRujhM+mV/7Yo2z/9Goze5Jl2IZXG+A7UgJHm3Rymr490h p/x9eI/6srZIyNsGuORS4/VXTbFqvfgGOQeGZv8C73T63P/RgsZJNcMN6sfrgMIxR7m2 ssP8ggBWb0oe7xLh1ONTI/FD+/HjyytKWgaArQohw8vqa0SMaZVNbs1ep85gae/Hdym5 lpDw== X-Received: by 10.180.75.115 with SMTP id b19mr52480277wiw.19.1388605590282; Wed, 01 Jan 2014 11:46:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.10] (105.33.91.91.rev.sfr.net. [91.91.33.105]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id gd5sm36632198wic.0.2014.01.01.11.46.29 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 01 Jan 2014 11:46:29 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52C47092.5090200@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2014 20:46:26 +0100 From: David Demelier User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adrian Chadd Subject: Re: Font smudges when libreoffice dependencies are installed References: <52BEC7F6.6070509@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2014 19:46:32 -0000 On 01/01/2014 01:33, Adrian Chadd wrote: > Hi, > > On 28 December 2013 04:45, David Demelier wrote: >> Hello folks, >> >> When I install libreoffice, some fonts are also installed. I don't know >> which ones, but it produces a lot of smudges in thunderbird and / or >> firefox. > > You mean the screen artifacts where it's supposed to be rendering text? > > Yes, but it also appears on firefox. Usually when I open a new tab all the fonts in the page get smudged for some seconds and then it goes normal again. It's a bit annoying, I've read somewhere that the hardware acceleration may the problem, but it's disabled.. It *only* appears with Thunderbird and Firefox. A friend of mine has exactly the same problem, we never found any solution. Regards and happy new year :-). > > -a > >> See the screenshot : >> >> http://www.demelierdavid.fr/files/Smudges.png >> >> It usually appears when loading a new tab or something similar and >> disappear when you scroll a bit. It's quite annoying and I can't find >> any solution.. >> >> I think the problem stays at the fontconfig, maybe conflicts? I'm using >> almost defaults. >> >> Cheers, >> David Demelier >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 1 19:51:58 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC8D438F for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 19:51:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7ACAF105E for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 19:51:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id s01Jpu51005184 for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 12:51:56 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <52C471DC.7010608@dreamchaser.org> Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2014 12:51:56 -0700 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130730 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: java? Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Wed, 01 Jan 2014 12:51:56 -0700 (MST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2014 19:51:58 -0000 In trying to update openoffice using "portmaster editors/openoffice-3", I get a complaint about openjdk6 marked as forbidden because it triggers a nasty bug. I've got both openjdk6 and openjdk7 installed, but can't build either as they are both marked forbidden. Anyone know what's going on, and what the prognosis for correction is? Also, the Makefile indicates JAVA_VENDOR= openjdk JAVA_VERSION= 1.6+ Why does it choose to use openjdk6 when openjdk7 is also installed? I tried export JAVA_VERSION=1.7 ; portmaster editors/openoffice-3 and it still tries to use openjdk6. Is there a different jdk which will work? Thanks, Gary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jan 1 23:48:49 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A4FC93A for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 23:48:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from alogt.com (alogt.com [69.36.191.58]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4A031FE6 for ; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 23:48:48 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alogt.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=idQl1x1vU4bxkNepqgABLfTxq3zNHNrCm+iw7xvu8o4=; b=QuNjwn/s7QwAjZKL/OsSW+u5jD270ZbYor+RXFIcOXR7DYJD6Fe8meHAgdn8DabrDbkZykumLauyZIUDBkvP0UB/ZNiZN/jd5fiXb9b7pk+pAGWHjnsFdGAarR/vPuNQR6xKQKUkSXNWHyc+MZf+VwFDTTMsk+9WNpTnENv6nhY=; Received: from [182.1.31.117] (port=37842 helo=X220.alogt.com) by sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net with esmtpsa (SSLv3:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1VyVWn-0008S7-61; Wed, 01 Jan 2014 16:48:48 -0700 Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 07:48:37 +0800 From: Erich Dollansky To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org Subject: Re: updating /sys/sys Message-ID: <20140102074837.564f662f@X220.alogt.com> In-Reply-To: <52C4530F.3070405@dreamchaser.org> References: <52C37801.8010001@dreamchaser.org> <20140101114745.3a3e37fb@X220.alogt.com> <52C3CC18.30407@dreamchaser.org> <20140101184142.5f11b3f6@X220.alogt.com> <52C4530F.3070405@dreamchaser.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.2 (GTK+ 2.24.19; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - freebsd.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - alogt.com X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: sl-508-2.slc.westdc.net: authenticated_id: erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2014 23:48:49 -0000 Hi, On Wed, 01 Jan 2014 10:40:31 -0700 Gary Aitken wrote: > On 01/01/14 03:41, Erich Dollansky wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Wed, 01 Jan 2014 01:04:40 -0700 > > Gary Aitken wrote: > > > >> On 12/31/13 20:47, Erich Dollansky wrote: > >> > >>>> I just used freebsd-update to upgrade from 9.1 to 9.2. Everything > >>>> seemed to go properly, but if I look at /sys/sys all of the .h > >>>> files say something like: * $FreeBSD: > >>>> release/9.0.0/sys/sys/cons.h 196506 2009-08-24 10:53:30Z ed $ > >>>> > >>>> /etc/freebsd-update looks like: > >>>> > >>>> ... Components src world kernel IgnorePaths ... > >>>> > >>>> Why aren't they updated? > >>> > >>> why should they? They define the 'interface' to the > >>> implementation. It is most important that these interfaces do > >>> change as little as possible especially in a STABLE version. > >> > >> If I think about it, it seems that what you say should be the case. > >> However, if you download the src tarball and do some diffs, you > >> will see that many of them are in fact different; how significant > >> those differences are, I'm not sure. I hit this problem trying to > >> build sysutils/lsof quite a while ago. It still doesn't build for > >> me after upgrading to 9.2. > > > > I never used a 9.X, so I do not know. If .h files are changed - I > > mean not just the comments - it is not possible to run old binaries > > from the version before. But binaries from 9.0 should run on 9.2. > >> > >>> They can change when you update to 10 and they can change all the > >>> while on CURRENT but not on RELEASE versions like 8 and 9. > >> > >> Maybe that *should* be the situation, but it is not in actuality. > > > > It happens for parts which under development. > >> > >>>> What's the best way to get them updated? > >>> > >>> You should have the current version if nothing is mentioned in > >>> UPDATING. > >> > >> I ended up getting them via the src.txz tarball: > >> ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/amd64/amd64/9.2-RELEASE/ > >> > >> Moving the 9.0 /usr/src/sys/sys directory to the side and > >> symlinking to the usr/src/sys/sys directory from the 9.2 tarball > >> allows it to compile. > > > > Sounds strange. Every RELEASE must compile. At least the world has > > to compile. It is a different story for a custom build kernel. > > There is the chance that you select a combination of options which > > will not result in a working kernel. Sometimes, this is documented, > > sometimes, it is not. > > The release compiles with it's own (9.2-RELEASE) /usr/src/sys/sys. > The problem is that /usr/src is not updated under some conditions, > apparently, when freebsd-update is run, even if freebsd-update > includes "src" in the "Components" line. I do not know about this as I update only via source. > > Hmmm. When I first installed 9.0, I don't think I had any source > installed, but /usr/src/sys is part of the base install. This would > be consistent with the state of my system, which has a stubbed out > directory tree for everything in /usr/src except for /usr/src/sys. > The default for "StrictComponents" is no, and when it goes to > determine whether or not to update it makes the decision based on > whether or not more than 50% of the files that are supposed to be > there are actually there. I suspect the whole of src is considerably > more than double /usr/src/sys, so it would decide not to update. > The reason why the header files - or at least some of them - are part of every install is very simple. It is not possible to compile any software without the header files. As the installer does not know if you want later to build ports from sources or compile your own software, the header files are installed. > Unfortunately, it is not possible to rerun freebsd-update on the same > version to correct a problem such as this. > > I am not sure whether /usr/src/sys is considered part of the "world" > or "kernel" components or not; if it is not, then the above would > explain the behavior. If it is considered part of "world" or > "kernel", then it would not explain it. You need the header files - which are included there - to compile any piece of software. This could be the reason why they are there. I am a bit confused about how you update and why. If you compile your own kernel, just use svn to keep the sources current. If you do not compile your own kernel, just ignore there things as they will not affect you. Erich From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 2 01:57:13 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F071E09 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 01:57:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail4-b.eqx.gridhost.co.uk (mail4-b.eqx.gridhost.co.uk [95.142.156.15]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 17CC71760 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 01:57:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [86.5.77.2] (helo=[192.168.0.17]) by mail4-b.eqx.gridhost.co.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VyWqV-0006Ju-IU for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 01:13:11 +0000 From: Ben Paley Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: VirtualBox and Xorg Message-Id: Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 01:13:10 +0000 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 7.1 \(1827\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1827) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 01:57:13 -0000 Hello all, I=92ve installed 9.2-RELEASE in VirtualBox on a Macbook. It was, against = my expectations, pretty much the easiest install I=92ve ever done, but = I=92ve had trouble with Xorg. I followed the instructions at = http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/virtualization-guest.html#virtualizati= on-guest-virtualbox-guest-additions - I=92ve installed = emulators/virtualbox-ose-additions successfully (as far as I can tell, = anyway; VB now lets me configure a shared directory, even though I don=92t= seem to be able to mount it because FreeBSD doesn=92t support the file = system). I=92ve added the vboxguest and vboxservice lines to rc.conf, = and I=92ve created /usr/local/etc/hal/fdi/policy/90-vboxguest.fdi with = permissions 644 owned by root:wheel. If I do startx with no configuration then I get a nice vanilla X but the = cursor doesn=92t respond. If I do "Xorg -configure=94 then the Device section in xorg.conf.new is = just like the one in the docs. The InputDevice is a little different: Section =93InputDevice=94 Identifier =93Mouse0=94 Driver =93vboxmouse=94 Option =93Protocol=94 =93auto=94 Option =93Device=94 =93/dev/sysmouse=94 Option =93ZAxisMapping=94 =934 5 6 7=94 EndSection =85but commenting out the extra lines doesn=92t seem to change anything: = if I do =93X -config /root/xorg.conf.new=94 then the screen goes black = and I=92m not sure what=92s happening. The cursor gets captured and = released by VirtualBox just as it should, but while it=92s captured it = becomes black or invisible or ceases to exist, or something. In any case = I don=92t think it moves, because when I release it, it shows up in the = same place even if I=92ve been wiggling my finger around. I have a feeling that the vboxmouse and vboxvideo aren=92t present, or = are improperly detected or something. Am I supposed to install them = separately? Or is there anything else obvious? Or non-obvious? I=92m not sure whether or not the system is using HAL - hal-0.5.14_20 is = installed, but I don=92t really know if I need the HAL policy file: but = it doesn=92t seem to make any difference if I move it. Thanks very much in advance, Ben= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 2 02:12:33 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BAAE13E for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 02:12:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pb0-x236.google.com (mail-pb0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::236]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50F2418CF for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 02:12:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f54.google.com with SMTP id un15so13934869pbc.13 for ; Wed, 01 Jan 2014 18:12:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=UJqL9SCjtjlxui9mtxnCB78sNQfFiGgQUgnimyiIRWY=; b=xNcvnrZ/nlWlmhDYQOqsFWDCSxSqTKs8mAqFzKpygaOAl+LF1uz2+jUIvHrpb5knDk vLg0HMRiTpB6UAhFqe/n4ch8wW87tBOwptbnrW7EEQpIbVQqmWfQyB0fky5yh/+IkURC LQYhLE3BTljdTqUT4tXtxt8EZMcBwt5mPmxNZiQ+EK03Sc4Gww5/IuEzBeqpy09sjZZR rd1OeUt/zZlAX0bhKb8Rw+TIDRvXVDWpFOLO/j+hLoyLLcVbzLELIVchXn8pMJyJ9gW4 RIKUNJpfrI8PnxUG1UgwUKfwDtkLHo9goXBTNY45KiXrse3INWBaFFsztgI9paEll2K/ rdnw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.228.138 with SMTP id si10mr85906878pbc.13.1388628752885; Wed, 01 Jan 2014 18:12:32 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.92.71 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 18:12:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2014 20:12:32 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: VirtualBox and Xorg From: Adam Vande More To: Ben Paley Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 02:12:33 -0000 IOn Wed, Jan 1, 2014 at 7:13 PM, Ben Paley wrote: > Hello all, > > I=92ve installed 9.2-RELEASE in VirtualBox on a Macbook. It was, against = my > expectations, pretty much the easiest install I=92ve ever done, but I=92v= e had > trouble with Xorg. > > I followed the instructions at > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/handbook/virtualization-guest.html#virtualizat= ion-guest-virtualbox-guest-additions- I=92ve installed emulators/virtualbox= -ose-additions successfully (as far as > I can tell, anyway; VB now lets me configure a shared directory, even > though I don=92t seem to be able to mount it because FreeBSD doesn=92t su= pport > the file system). I=92ve added the vboxguest and vboxservice lines to > rc.conf, and I=92ve created /usr/local/etc/hal/fdi/policy/90-vboxguest.fd= i > with permissions 644 owned by root:wheel. > > If I do startx with no configuration then I get a nice vanilla X but the > cursor doesn=92t respond. > > If I do "Xorg -configure=94 then the Device section in xorg.conf.new is j= ust > like the one in the docs. The InputDevice is a little different: > > Section =93InputDevice=94 > Identifier =93Mouse0=94 > Driver =93vboxmouse=94 > Option =93Protocol=94 =93auto=94 > Option =93Device=94 =93/dev/sysmouse=94 > Option =93ZAxisMapping=94 =934 5 6 7=94 > EndSection > > =85but commenting out the extra lines doesn=92t seem to change anything: = if I > do =93X -config /root/xorg.conf.new=94 then the screen goes black and I= =92m not > sure what=92s happening. The cursor gets captured and released by Virtual= Box > just as it should, but while it=92s captured it becomes black or invisibl= e or > ceases to exist, or something. In any case I don=92t think it moves, beca= use > when I release it, it shows up in the same place even if I=92ve been wigg= ling > my finger around. > > I have a feeling that the vboxmouse and vboxvideo aren=92t present, or ar= e > improperly detected or something. Am I supposed to install them separatel= y? > Or is there anything else obvious? Or non-obvious? > > I=92m not sure whether or not the system is using HAL - hal-0.5.14_20 is > installed, but I don=92t really know if I need the HAL policy file: but i= t > doesn=92t seem to make any difference if I move it. > It is generally easier to run a full desktop environment like kde rather than just vanilla X, see the handbook. Also install the xorg-minimal package to insure you've got the needed depends installed. The FreeBSD VBox wiki works well for me. If it doesn't for you, please isolate the step where it fails and post the results. --=20 Adam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 2 03:41:50 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D4CA72D for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 03:41:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nightmare.dreamchaser.org (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.44.142]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BEA051FEE for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 03:41:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from breakaway.dreamchaser.org (breakaway.dreamchaser.org. [12.32.36.73]) by nightmare.dreamchaser.org (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id s023faUj006460; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 20:41:36 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from freebsd@dreamchaser.org) Message-ID: <52C4DFF0.2030108@dreamchaser.org> Date: Wed, 01 Jan 2014 20:41:36 -0700 From: Gary Aitken User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130730 Thunderbird/17.0.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Erich Dollansky Subject: Re: updating /sys/sys References: <52C37801.8010001@dreamchaser.org> <20140101114745.3a3e37fb@X220.alogt.com> <52C3CC18.30407@dreamchaser.org> <20140101184142.5f11b3f6@X220.alogt.com> <52C4530F.3070405@dreamchaser.org> <20140102074837.564f662f@X220.alogt.com> In-Reply-To: <20140102074837.564f662f@X220.alogt.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-2.0.2 (nightmare.dreamchaser.org [12.32.36.65]); Wed, 01 Jan 2014 20:41:36 -0700 (MST) Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 03:41:50 -0000 On 01/01/14 16:48, Erich Dollansky wrote: >> Unfortunately, it is not possible to rerun freebsd-update on the same >> version to correct a problem such as this. >> >> I am not sure whether /usr/src/sys is considered part of the "world" >> or "kernel" components or not; if it is not, then the above would >> explain the behavior. If it is considered part of "world" or >> "kernel", then it would not explain it. > > You need the header files - which are included there - to compile any > piece of software. This could be the reason why they are there. I understand that! > I am a bit confused about how you update and why. If you compile your > own kernel, just use svn to keep the sources current. If you do not > compile your own kernel, just ignore there things as they will not > affect you. I don't compile my own kernel on this system. However, I can't "just ignore these things". The header files are needed, as you point out, to compile anything. As I described earlier, the header files did in fact change with the dot releases of release 9, and in a manner such that some of the ports would not compile if the header files were not also updated. In particular, sysutils/lsof. So the header files have to be updated with each dot release update. Since the header files were not updated by my "freebsd-update -r 9.2-RELEASE upgrade" command, I had to update them separately. I *suspect* that problem could have been avoided if my /etc/freebsd-update.conf had "StrictComponents yes" set. If freebsd-update allowed updating the current install to itself, I could have changed the StrictComponents flag and rerun it, but freebsd-update does not allow that. So one is left with having to update the source in some other way, such as the one I used. In any case, the system is now consistent and I've changed the StrictComponents flag so it should, I hope, update properly in the future. Gary From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 2 04:25:34 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DCE58BF3 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 04:25:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 89984125A for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 04:25:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s024PNf7075081; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 21:25:23 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id s024PML0075078; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 21:25:22 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2014 21:25:22 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: Ben Paley Subject: Re: VirtualBox and Xorg In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Wed, 01 Jan 2014 21:25:23 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 04:25:34 -0000 On Thu, 2 Jan 2014, Ben Paley wrote: > If I do startx with no configuration then I get a nice vanilla X but > the cursor doesn?t respond. If the desktop environment does not require it, build x11-servers/xorg-server with the HAL option off. Otherwise, add Option "AutoAddDevices" "Off" to the ServerLayout section of xorg.conf. This is the entire xorg.conf from a 9.1-STABLE VM (with HAL off): Section "ServerLayout" Identifier "xfce" InputDevice "Mouse1" # Option "AutoAddDevices" "Off" EndSection Section "InputDevice" Identifier "Mouse1" Driver "vboxmouse" EndSection Autoconfiguration of everything else works. The AutoAddDevices line is not present on mine, uncomment it to disable HAL. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 2 04:28:54 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49318CA9 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 04:28:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bk0-x229.google.com (mail-bk0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4008:c01::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFDD01281 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 04:28:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-bk0-f41.google.com with SMTP id v15so4419826bkz.14 for ; Wed, 01 Jan 2014 20:28:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=GAbodmW16GwAhG1mjqzc6I3RA1EG6GsI00aEaLXva40=; b=F/RTPRqEWDti6npZvrEyCW859HHVfls0vLgLVM8m+L6ibP/RbqiWVPW9MGJbNXK1ZN Z4dEgyKzVo9sd2AsyJvKvzzgjz4JJCy+sO1if9wXND8MBECL+fYLESWQ9xYoQ4lSkaxR K8MnUh+hAw2lVOl86+nOammKGZX4ThmAuK/UcvIlGmHauSQ2OOHfcvmmr10mszY/rSiG LlEdbx/tqZeh9nRtQaVfrVhJ8pOzwkEHIV63WS1Vs9EPEIgBBnXTymx3K/anMyYu/Ey+ d0oMFnbhjd06dKSQyYh1x1Zr4WmunJr+TRzm3KmFzzItoWDDguPIUDUoghJ7FKS5CuMi HuPw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.205.65.4 with SMTP id xk4mr19511bkb.178.1388636932080; Wed, 01 Jan 2014 20:28:52 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.123.193 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Jan 2014 20:28:52 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52C471DC.7010608@dreamchaser.org> References: <52C471DC.7010608@dreamchaser.org> Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2014 20:28:52 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: java? From: Waitman Gobble To: freebsd@dreamchaser.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 04:28:54 -0000 On Jan 1, 2014 11:52 AM, "Gary Aitken" wrote: > > In trying to update openoffice using "portmaster editors/openoffice-3", > I get a complaint about openjdk6 marked as forbidden because it triggers > a nasty bug. I've got both openjdk6 and openjdk7 installed, but can't build > either as they are both marked forbidden. > > Anyone know what's going on, and what the prognosis for correction is? > > Also, the Makefile indicates > JAVA_VENDOR= openjdk > JAVA_VERSION= 1.6+ > > Why does it choose to use openjdk6 when openjdk7 is also installed? > I tried > export JAVA_VERSION=1.7 ; portmaster editors/openoffice-3 > and it still tries to use openjdk6. > > Is there a different jdk which will work? > > Thanks, > > Gary > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org Hi Gary, Alternative: Consider using libreoffice, you should be able to run without java. I believe the developers have been working to remove the Java dependency for awhile, it does about everything without it. Waitman Gobble San Jose California From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 2 11:33:58 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52A4B316 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 11:33:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oa0-x22f.google.com (mail-oa0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1D3B31F0E for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 11:33:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f47.google.com with SMTP id k1so14589764oag.6 for ; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 03:33:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=t2nG8Tz709+DpVIYI38Nkc7EVSOmWzHdKBBhgXse9yA=; b=cDHH/tUjJXqMnWtvpeVgbC9WXOtEOh6YSMBbN6YGaEvWPkjwnn5AhSum8fUzJcuF+x UXPg8x81qmN2m0s5+vCYlYL8vWpT16OW5qOP6z5romDOv8fjoq9vU/Yr/PYEKYtLH3ul ynBxicsIjk26c3keloFuZUvORt56n66/khbOGHp6w5q/K9mSr04Wn1tBJaQHqXvFf9zA T2DbOYMOjjdYhr+CGe4ObzDBhFLQoqk4Tm+CZftCnwajQ1L2ETaEQ1oyKKJw3QhU7H8R apxRkKzESH9ty9Kb0PiUW7DxcoqsJ0VD45ZwfeC5gcHNfyVc8tb5t3U6b90Rk1VwwUmN OQ+g== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.67.105 with SMTP id m9mr3786771oet.58.1388662437450; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 03:33:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.76.157.227 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 03:33:57 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 03:33:57 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: http://localhost/phpmyadmin From: joi Sanoubane To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 11:33:58 -0000 test =BFoi Sanoubane From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 2 12:33:33 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBD844F9 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 12:33:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lena.kiev.ua (lena.kiev.ua [82.146.52.81]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82D621605 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 12:33:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lena.kiev.ua; s=3; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Mime-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=U8EqTgslzHBnvIo2K6PTEDohtyjsvLGWnN9qN6ANDx4=; b=GDizF1vDt582tdW/DQsAqT3HXYIn4+hznRnT0EP0agdP9YsBBaVvixQS1MqjWyg/T3PpUGRvSST7xwErnmD1igYNHbPCU0V0PYIU7lM781uE0Rxk/t/pcPsyrzaL9a35GHyDvlom0skvZGmkJr+9cmcHxh5ZNABfHm7ZiaNPX1I=; Received: from ip-384c.rusanovka-net.kiev.ua ([94.244.56.76] helo=bedside.lena.kiev.ua) by lena.kiev.ua with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.82 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1VyhSr-0005nc-Lx; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 14:33:30 +0200 Received: from bedside.lena.kiev.ua (localhost.lena.kiev.ua [127.0.0.1]) by bedside.lena.kiev.ua (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s02CXH9l002386; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 14:33:17 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from Lena@lena.kiev.ua) Received: (from lena@localhost) by bedside.lena.kiev.ua (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id s02CXGiA002385; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 14:33:16 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from Lena@lena.kiev.ua) Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 14:33:16 +0200 From: Lena@lena.kiev.ua To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Running FreeBSD for my personal website: collocation, cloud, etc. Message-ID: <20140102123316.GC798@lena.kiev> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.3i Cc: Chris Stankevitz X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 12:33:33 -0000 > there are quite a few other smaller players. This FreeBSD > News article from June lists some > http://www.freebsdnews.net/2013/06/05/reliable-customer-friendly-freebsd-hosting/ They mention FirstVDS.ru, but that website is in Russian. The same Russian company has also English-language website, you can choose server in USA (NAC MMU datacenter near NYC) or Russia. I use their cheapest VPS option (now $4.95/month) since 2008. It's a jail under FreeBSD with limited resources (RAM 64M, swap 128M, disk 5 GB, traffic 100 GB/month, one IPv4 IP-address). Kernel RAM and preinstalled packages aren't counted in these limits. If you use this link for ordering then both you and me get a discount: http://joinvps.com/?from=33485 In my VPS (jail) I installed (from ports) `mathopd` web-server and Exim instead of default Apache and sendmail. My Exim config including all the spam-filtering: https://github.com/Exim/exim/wiki/LenasConfig Lena From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 2 14:44:35 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE567865 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 14:44:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.bsdbox.co (122-149-22-79.static.dsl.dodo.com.au [122.149.22.79]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 412231F74 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 14:44:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.0.4] (122-149-22-79.static.dsl.dodo.com.au [122.149.22.79]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.bsdbox.co (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5088C238F28 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 14:44:32 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <52C57B4B.2090308@bsdbox.co> Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 01:44:27 +1100 From: nano User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: losing jail alias IP addresses Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 14:44:36 -0000 ||I keep dropping jail (alias) IP addresses; that is, the IP disappears from ifconfig on the host and in the jail and whatever services (e.g. web or mail server) running in the jail become inaccessible. An example jail creation process on FreeBSD nakatomi.bsdbox.co 9.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE #0 r255898: Fri Sep 27 03:52:52 UTC 2013 root@bake.isc.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 # ifconfig wlan0 alias 10.0.0.22 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.0.255 # echo 'ifconfig_wlan0_alias3="inet 10.0.0.22 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.0.255"' >> /etc/rc.conf # echo '10.0.0.22 leavenworth' >> /etc/hosts # ezjail-admin create leavenworth 10.0.0.22 # cp /etc/resolv.conf /usr/jails/leavenworth/etc/ # ezjail-admin start leavenworth # ezjail-admin console leavenworth # echo 'hostname="leavenworth"' >> /etc/rc.conf # vi /etc/hosts 127.0.0.1 localhost leavenworth 10.0.0.22 leavenworth :wq This occurs with some regularity. I have 3 development jails running and at least one of them will drop an IP every 24-72 hours. There appears to be no regular pattern, albeit at least one will go down every couple days. I assigned a /32 CIDR to all jails (in the example above you will notice a /24 assignment), this did not provide a fix. I assigned an IP to the host in its rc.conf, this did not solve the problem either. Further intel: # cat /etc/rc.conf: hostname="nakatomi.bsdbox.co" wlans_ath0="wlan0" ifconfig_wlan0="WPA DHCP" sshd_enable="YES" moused_enable="YES" ntpd_enable="YES" dumpdev="NO" #hald_enable="YES" #dbus_enable="YES" pf_enable="YES" pflog_enable="YES" fail2ban_enable="YES" #ifconfig_wlan0="inet 10.0.0.50/24" #defaultrouter="10.0.0.138" # AMP ifconfig_wlan0_alias0="inet 10.0.0.111 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 10.0.0.255" # relay ifconfig_wlan0_alias1="inet 10.0.0.112 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 10.0.0.255" # mail srv ifconfig_wlan0_alias2="inet 10.0.0.113 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 10.0.0.255" # research and tech dev ifconfig_wlan0_alias3="inet 10.0.0.114 netmask 0xffffffff broadcast 10.0.0.255" ezjail_enable="YES" # cat /etc/hosts |||||127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.bsdbox.co 127.0.0.1 nakatomi.bsdbox.co nakatomi localhost 10.0.0.50 nakatomi.bsdbox.co nakatomi 10.0.0.111 bsdbox.co 10.0.0.112 zero.bsdbox.co zero 10.0.0.113 mail.bsdbox.co mail 10.0.0.114 rtd.bsdbox.co rtd I notice that whenever the alias IP drops, my router displays the host IP as an address belonging to one of the jails. However, I have a static IP assignment to the host in my router configuration. log/messages reveals WPA rekeying every 10 minutes: Jan 3 01:04:13 nakatomi wpa_supplicant[568]: WPA: Group rekeying completed with IPv6 [GTK=CCMP] Jan 3 01:14:13 nakatomi wpa_supplicant[568]: WPA: Group rekeying completed with |||||||||IPv6 |||[GTK=CCMP] Jan 3 01:24:13 nakatomi wpa_supplicant[568]: WPA: Group rekeying completed with |||||||||IPv6||| [GTK=CCMP] Jan 3 01:34:13 nakatomi wpa_supplicant[568]: WPA: Group rekeying completed with |||||||||IPv6||| [GTK=CCMP] | host /etc/pf.conf: ext_if="wlan0" table persist set skip on lo0 antispoof for $ext_if inet block in from no-route to any block in from urpf-failed to any block in quick on $ext_if from any to 255.255.255.255 block in quick on $ext_if proto tcp flags FUP/WEUAPRSF block in quick on $ext_if proto tcp flags WEUAPRSF/WEUAPRSF block in quick on $ext_if proto tcp flags SRAFU/WEUAPRSF block in quick on $ext_if proto tcp flags /WEUAPRSF block in quick on $ext_if proto tcp flags SR/SR block in quick on $ext_if proto tcp flags SF/SF block in quick on $ext_if from to any pass out on $ext_if proto { tcp, udp, icmp } from any to any modulate state pass in on $ext_if proto tcp from any to any port ssh flags S/SA synproxy state pass in on $ext_if proto tcp from any to any port www flags S/SA synproxy state sample ezjail configuration file: export jail_bsdbox_co_hostname="bsdbox.co" export jail_bsdbox_co_ip="10.0.0.111" export jail_bsdbox_co_rootdir="/usr/jails/bsdbox.co" export jail_bsdbox_co_exec_start="/bin/sh /etc/rc" export jail_bsdbox_co_exec_stop="" export jail_bsdbox_co_mount_enable="YES" export jail_bsdbox_co_devfs_enable="YES" export jail_bsdbox_co_devfs_ruleset="devfsrules_jail" export jail_bsdbox_co_procfs_enable="YES" export jail_bsdbox_co_fdescfs_enable="YES" sample pflog dump (appears to be repeated igmp queries* every couple minutes): reading from file /var/log/pflog, link-type PFLOG (OpenBSD pflog file) 2014-01-03 01:11:58.827324 IP BigPond.BigPond > all-systems.mcast.net: igmp query v3 2014-01-03 01:14:03.858878 IP BigPond.BigPond > all-systems.mcast.net: igmp query v3 2014-01-03 01:16:08.889474 IP BigPond.BigPond > all-systems.mcast.net: igmp query v3 2014-01-03 01:18:13.920559 IP BigPond.BigPond > all-systems.mcast.net: igmp query v3 2014-01-03 01:20:18.951744 IP BigPond.BigPond > all-systems.mcast.net: igmp query v3 2014-01-03 01:22:24.290028 IP BigPond.BigPond > all-systems.mcast.net: igmp query v3 2014-01-03 01:24:29.321296 IP BigPond.BigPond > all-systems.mcast.net: igmp query v3 Not really sure what to do, obviously there is some user error. I am seeking any suggestions. Thank you. *UPnP perhaps? || -- syn.bsdbox.co From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 2 18:20:39 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3A4F866 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 18:20:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qe0-x22d.google.com (mail-qe0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c02::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 622521347 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 18:20:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qe0-f45.google.com with SMTP id 6so14321522qea.4 for ; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 10:20:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9EM8luj287i9WW2tcre1BZTmw0mS0VEBLxe9zbXYVEA=; b=uE1zL7TUyxsgDJVsEEPM2ecMbryZfjUBKcamvwY03eqFyEh3LPPJJSg6MS8/lWNIka I9Isyts+BIikuDdC56MnU49g23KnKY5A0t7C1w0A9hgx79t+x57pX/5Fmk7bblulik0u ONu1ksanZCw48zh6LR8hwv2L5M4YerW/3EZxjCLdyXKbykXsur36m107SjQvVMuNxvg7 5Gmh9csjQg6+Pg+gKl8ugnpbn3E4B9DOB9iupaJ4h8hdKItW3bCWzah5RZk89Wzx08TN k2OYfPjzIauQtanS+OBCvSI8Fpe2YH6n75capdIRAnGVWfc1XnhcSCDz6ZrohBjO7rlT 0CNA== X-Received: by 10.224.40.82 with SMTP id j18mr2062485qae.23.1388686838515; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 10:20:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ool-44c0cdb5.dyn.optonline.net. [68.192.205.181]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id v1sm72407915qas.15.2014.01.02.10.20.37 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 02 Jan 2014 10:20:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52C5ADFB.9040207@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 13:20:43 -0500 From: Stephen Cook User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: openjdk-7.45.18_1 is forbidden: Triggering a nasty FreeBSD bug. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 18:20:39 -0000 Hello! I'm trying to install OpenJDK and it gives me this error: openjdk-7.45.18_1 is forbidden: Triggering a nasty FreeBSD bug. I'm fairly new to FreeBSD and I'm not sure where to go from here. Can I try an earlier version or something? Googling it lead me to a pastebin page with mention of removing "FORBIDDEN" from the makefile if you know what you are doing, but unfortunately I don't. Or can anyone recommend some other Java port? My main purpose at the moment is to screw around with a Minecraft server, although I have some other more important (but less amusing) reasons to have Java on my system in the near future. Thanks! -- Stephen Cook From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 2 18:38:05 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E51351FD; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 18:38:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-x22e.google.com (mail-pd0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22e]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B61F314E5; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 18:38:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f174.google.com with SMTP id x10so14274801pdj.5 for ; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 10:38:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=50yqLFtj/dRYM/dpDK4Vi3mRwRB5UmDOhCQ6tTknAzw=; b=urrUILdrWs1bEvfAo2h1F8ta9cuuwZ8DmcoVL/UPjhfbrZtsrBLtiw3CP44qxOBvpp OJn6UcdvL4/FHSClwt1e6ER8INdT4NJ9BNgEGPr4WmAZn1JHjY8muM52aiOQpAWiP6NK /v1XaKOu2LTtO7F35ar3nbGJlz8DkWeU4lRg2HLbi/PI2iJ2S2DUdd58+M/kNBmwmGMn KIO9ECAjey2TczySyzs+oqBILiRtVYIYagF5FYF1hSAbksnwVsmFLYYSD++N6HG8u1Ca mYcjlAXsADIKpzVCS8lcziq8lNtRS6bzfCjrHTBikae0vWZ6qnrvz355RsdCnqVcEuLV YqnQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.4.130 with SMTP id k2mr90013152pak.95.1388687884438; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 10:38:04 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.92.71 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 10:38:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52C5ADFB.9040207@gmail.com> References: <52C5ADFB.9040207@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 12:38:04 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: openjdk-7.45.18_1 is forbidden: Triggering a nasty FreeBSD bug. From: Adam Vande More To: Stephen Cook Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 Cc: Baptiste Daroussin , FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 18:38:05 -0000 On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 12:20 PM, Stephen Cook wrote: > Hello! > > I'm trying to install OpenJDK and it gives me this error: > openjdk-7.45.18_1 is forbidden: Triggering a nasty FreeBSD bug. > > I'm fairly new to FreeBSD and I'm not sure where to go from here. Can I > try an earlier version or something? Googling it lead me to a pastebin page > with mention of removing "FORBIDDEN" from the makefile if you know what you > are doing, but unfortunately I don't. > > Or can anyone recommend some other Java port? My main purpose at the > moment is to screw around with a Minecraft server, although I have some > other more important (but less amusing) reasons to have Java on my system > in the near future. > FreeBSD 10.0-RC4 is noted as having fixed the bug, so if you are running that or something else the fix has been MFC'd to, it might be safe to remove the FORBIDDEN line. -- Adam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 2 21:30:33 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3FA0E25 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 21:30:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-x22f.google.com (mail-pd0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8A7A11510 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 21:30:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f175.google.com with SMTP id w10so14582192pde.34 for ; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 13:30:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=ilKsc/Tv5IZMPbs3oLD70NBtsBB/V7ZvozV6HgkbDss=; b=ia7S/tg7wHAxGuUOFoOw841xw8K/13snTWdxUWoB1jQQPqhWqSffgmJrlBsF5ELAVV U5ocflYm2Z2+VGRX4EMgHbOq/Za4rNChe/J+tGagXJgCU7AVggd/m7xxYIe8UWdeK4/z NJF8O9hYpTl9Eqi+zqKW53ND4AQeUBJ+fomYeuWlwL2kasU0Agf1+55fhOhz0pV9rAIR AJTqtzCkx+F7tQ600Ov37f4WTnqzYc1EnKAkFtiqDQ58Kfas4cSsP8JjbcjtiRvU6VbD 5v7jApTV0m30xR9kG5L+QfJSpZNPrmp9E7OVqS8jfCUtd/QXez/olcwJPuvG1mCai+3a ZeqA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.136.101 with SMTP id pz5mr91598679pab.118.1388698233036; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 13:30:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.184.3 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 13:30:32 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <52C5ADFB.9040207@gmail.com> References: <52C5ADFB.9040207@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 11:30:32 -1000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: openjdk-7.45.18_1 is forbidden: Triggering a nasty FreeBSD bug. From: Kent Kuriyama To: Stephen Cook Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 21:30:33 -0000 Stephen, I am using openjdk6-b29 under FBSD 9.2 to run the Minecraft server. Works great. Kent On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 8:20 AM, Stephen Cook wrote: > Hello! > > I'm trying to install OpenJDK and it gives me this error: > openjdk-7.45.18_1 is forbidden: Triggering a nasty FreeBSD bug. > > I'm fairly new to FreeBSD and I'm not sure where to go from here. Can I > try an earlier version or something? Googling it lead me to a pastebin page > with mention of removing "FORBIDDEN" from the makefile if you know what you > are doing, but unfortunately I don't. > > Or can anyone recommend some other Java port? My main purpose at the > moment is to screw around with a Minecraft server, although I have some > other more important (but less amusing) reasons to have Java on my system > in the near future. > > Thanks! > > -- Stephen Cook > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 2 22:46:42 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64F5366C for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 22:46:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2159D1B1F for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 22:46:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vyqnc-0005R1-Kw for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 23:31:32 +0100 Received: from cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginm.net ([86.21.186.149]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 23:31:32 +0100 Received: from walterhurry by cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginm.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 23:31:32 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Walter Hurry Subject: Re: openjdk-7.45.18_1 is forbidden: Triggering a nasty FreeBSD bug. Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 22:31:10 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 22 Message-ID: References: <52C5ADFB.9040207@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginm.net User-Agent: Pan/0.139 (Sexual Chocolate; GIT bf56508 git://git.gnome.org/pan2) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 22:46:42 -0000 On Thu, 02 Jan 2014 13:20:43 -0500, Stephen Cook wrote: > Hello! > > I'm trying to install OpenJDK and it gives me this error: > openjdk-7.45.18_1 is forbidden: Triggering a nasty FreeBSD bug. > > I'm fairly new to FreeBSD and I'm not sure where to go from here. Can I > try an earlier version or something? Googling it lead me to a pastebin > page with mention of removing "FORBIDDEN" from the makefile if you know > what you are doing, but unfortunately I don't. > > Or can anyone recommend some other Java port? My main purpose at the > moment is to screw around with a Minecraft server, although I have some > other more important (but less amusing) reasons to have Java on my > system in the near future. > As a fellow newbie, my instinct is just to wait, rather than screwing around. They don't usually take long, and I prefer to err on the side of caution. BTW, someone mentioned openjdk6, but that's marked as forbidden too. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 2 23:25:05 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAFC86B for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 23:25:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A91651E70 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 23:25:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VyrdP-0003VG-JE for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 00:25:03 +0100 Received: from 216.17.42.59.ip.usinternet.com ([216.17.42.59]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 00:25:03 +0100 Received: from SPAM_TRAP_gmane by 216.17.42.59.ip.usinternet.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 00:25:03 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Jonesy Subject: Re: Running FreeBSD for my personal website: collocation, cloud, etc. Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 16:42:54 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 29 Message-ID: References: <20140102123316.GC798@lena.kiev> X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.17.42.59.ip.usinternet.com User-Agent: slrn/1.0.1 (FreeBSD) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 23:25:06 -0000 On Thu, 2 Jan 2014 14:33:16 +0200, Lena@lena.kiev.ua wrote: >> there are quite a few other smaller players. This FreeBSD >> News article from June lists some >> http://www.freebsdnews.net/2013/06/05/reliable-customer-friendly-freebsd-hosting/ > > They mention FirstVDS.ru, but that website is in Russian. The same > Russian company has also English-language website, you can choose > server in USA (NAC MMU datacenter near NYC) or Russia. I can recommend KNThost: https://www.knthost.com/ https://www.knthost.com/managed-virtual-private-servers Very decent pricing for Very Decent service and support. I've had FreeBSD VPS account there for some years now. They've only recently gone retail-direct. Here-to-fore they've done hosting services for ISPs. Full disclosure: I have my VPS with them, and I have 5 client web sites hosted there, as well. HNY, Jonesy -- Marvin L Jones | jonz | W3DHJ | linux 38.24N 104.55W | @ config.com | Jonesy | OS/2 * Killfiling google & XXXXbanter.com: jonz.net/ng.htm From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 2 23:49:43 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2AAE5F4 for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 23:49:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from keepquiet.net (keepquiet.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:130:84c1::deaf:babe]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7335B1FCD for ; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 23:49:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.165.205.216] (2.150.49.192.tmi.telenormobil.no [2.150.49.192]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: terje@elde.net) by keepquiet.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CCAD52E07B; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 00:49:40 +0100 (CET) References: In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Message-Id: <98F9E13F-361E-4B5B-8701-509CE5D7EE3B@elde.net> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B329) From: Terje Elde Subject: Re: Running FreeBSD for my personal website: collocation, cloud, etc. Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 00:49:32 +0100 To: Chris Stankevitz Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 23:49:43 -0000 On 28. des. 2013, at 03:22, Chris Stankevitz wro= te: > Can you recommend a place/procedure by which I can easily (and > cheaply) Can you elaborate on what "cheaply" means to you? $1? 10? 100? Would make it easier to recommend something.=20 (For about $20-40/mo and up, you can rent colocation servers, hardware, rack= space and bandwith included. Often along the lines of a quadcore, two drives= and 4-8GB RAM) Terje From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 3 00:31:24 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6FB05C1 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 00:31:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qe0-x230.google.com (mail-qe0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c02::230]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 627A31359 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 00:31:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qe0-f48.google.com with SMTP id gc15so14973120qeb.7 for ; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 16:31:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=CvHbAc+K+SGSTAahcXDvV4PNbYtNLqe34+bux618hN8=; b=c4Ac6jjRVLDOSv9wSwipvs3CqJ8Nf7UyGE/XAXmA0JSgq75bZMYzLcSu+q56uucyZI UkK6Ceg/HAU+ufJD0i0SVJlHA+SB2VuRzjTMZwB/sduFUtPwGZcQAlX70/7+6pvROjL9 J4w1OSY28MKaTiWjedqeIG47WmjR9DuQnDT9lo3ZycmCHEd98EG6x+myw47xuy8j3rhJ 2ITWeEXVXBXjYGgpAa6l4/Aef3HV4Gr23zVGJcb04cpldJ/UPjjFoU+G9A1kRxUSQpXK NITZWTjdoC/5prsmOM1R1GnBkiKvIY9Senc/uiBXFMB4bLeUTFamWYuUyzYTnmmyFaq5 FIlg== X-Received: by 10.49.12.43 with SMTP id v11mr145977918qeb.50.1388709083585; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 16:31:23 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ool-44c0cdb5.dyn.optonline.net. [68.192.205.181]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id s14sm73993949qad.20.2014.01.02.16.31.22 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 02 Jan 2014 16:31:22 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52C604E1.7020106@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2014 19:31:29 -0500 From: Stephen Cook User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Walter Hurry , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openjdk-7.45.18_1 is forbidden: Triggering a nasty FreeBSD bug. References: <52C5ADFB.9040207@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 00:31:24 -0000 On 1/2/2014 5:31 PM, Walter Hurry wrote: > On Thu, 02 Jan 2014 13:20:43 -0500, Stephen Cook wrote: > >> Hello! >> >> I'm trying to install OpenJDK and it gives me this error: >> openjdk-7.45.18_1 is forbidden: Triggering a nasty FreeBSD bug. >> >> I'm fairly new to FreeBSD and I'm not sure where to go from here. Can I >> try an earlier version or something? Googling it lead me to a pastebin >> page with mention of removing "FORBIDDEN" from the makefile if you know >> what you are doing, but unfortunately I don't. >> >> Or can anyone recommend some other Java port? My main purpose at the >> moment is to screw around with a Minecraft server, although I have some >> other more important (but less amusing) reasons to have Java on my >> system in the near future. >> > As a fellow newbie, my instinct is just to wait, rather than screwing > around. They don't usually take long, and I prefer to err on the side of > caution. > > BTW, someone mentioned openjdk6, but that's marked as forbidden too. > I can't find what the actual bug is... I mean, if it will just make Minecraft unstable it is no big deal, I want to play with my kid. If it erases the hard drive or lights something on fire I can wait. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 3 01:24:50 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA793E05 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 01:24:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qc0-x229.google.com (mail-qc0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 78EDF16FA for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 01:24:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id r5so14481805qcx.28 for ; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 17:24:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:from:content-type:message-id:date:to :content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=kWNRoMQDrg+TMBt2bZgituqfLwX4qZsQLM+QJ53nprA=; b=Og7oin743/i/Zpa56eEWmj+GjJdKqYndMtZ46kErJ8WJhS28gCxipghRcx7BYh34Hx n53W5JTqZaCb1cEQkkxyz+++2uHCKTt+qzHBeIWwduNKT01ZAp7YqaND35wBiA5wG0Qv WhvyMnLYNZCsyEDihryYJPMCNDVRJX87HA17dJaOP8OaYoFt+QvuSrJZ4UWelAZqtbAl BWcRz2aicCVBCTUzIryFeU6y2AfpA4Yuof3npArFnEAef2Oo5oQWgQfsi2mmCRCjIjg3 Db8EvxK/JJSuzHE++0I4KgQ/fcBs17cBKi2lC2ZJ9TuFsUUnFdmSC0mIZ7ZWEPhDXQSK LUGg== X-Received: by 10.224.65.135 with SMTP id j7mr21402664qai.10.1388712289124; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 17:24:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.66.66.37] (c-98-236-85-52.hsd1.wv.comcast.net. [98.236.85.52]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id l8sm74227368qaz.14.2014.01.02.17.24.48 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 02 Jan 2014 17:24:48 -0800 (PST) Subject: Raspberry pie and beagle bone black From: Joshua Smith Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (11B554a) Message-Id: <01FA6D7F-6F3F-4EDB-AA14-F2941CE6563C@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 20:24:48 -0500 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 01:24:50 -0000 Hello list, I was lucky enough to receive a raspberry pie and a beagle bone black recent= ly and have been reading a bit about running freebsd on both. However most o= f the reading I've been able to find with google is a bit dated. Is there a c= anonical source for information on either platform? Thanks, -- Josh Smith KD8HRX Email/jabber: juicewvu@gmail.com Sent from my iPhone.=20= From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 3 02:07:03 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95DC872D for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 02:07:03 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 515271984 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 02:07:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VyuA8-0000JQ-A6 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 03:07:00 +0100 Received: from cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginm.net ([86.21.186.149]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 03:07:00 +0100 Received: from walterhurry by cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginm.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 03:07:00 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org From: Walter Hurry Subject: Re: openjdk-7.45.18_1 is forbidden: Triggering a nasty FreeBSD bug. Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 02:06:28 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 34 Message-ID: References: <52C5ADFB.9040207@gmail.com> < 52C604E1.7020106@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cpc3-walt15-2-0-cust148.13-2.cable.virginm.net User-Agent: Pan/0.139 (Sexual Chocolate; GIT bf56508 git://git.gnome.org/pan2) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 02:07:03 -0000 On Thu, 02 Jan 2014 19:31:29 -0500, Stephen Cook wrote: > On 1/2/2014 5:31 PM, Walter Hurry wrote: >> On Thu, 02 Jan 2014 13:20:43 -0500, Stephen Cook wrote: >> >>> Hello! >>> >>> I'm trying to install OpenJDK and it gives me this error: >>> openjdk-7.45.18_1 is forbidden: Triggering a nasty FreeBSD >>> bug. >>> >>> I'm fairly new to FreeBSD and I'm not sure where to go from here. Can >>> I try an earlier version or something? Googling it lead me to a >>> pastebin page with mention of removing "FORBIDDEN" from the makefile >>> if you know what you are doing, but unfortunately I don't. >>> >>> Or can anyone recommend some other Java port? My main purpose at the >>> moment is to screw around with a Minecraft server, although I have >>> some other more important (but less amusing) reasons to have Java on >>> my system in the near future. >>> >> As a fellow newbie, my instinct is just to wait, rather than screwing >> around. They don't usually take long, and I prefer to err on the side >> of caution. >> >> BTW, someone mentioned openjdk6, but that's marked as forbidden too. >> >> > I can't find what the actual bug is... I mean, if it will just make > Minecraft unstable it is no big deal, I want to play with my kid. If it > erases the hard drive or lights something on fire I can wait. > Well, if you want to risk it, just edit /usr/ports/java/openjdk7/Makefile and delete the "FORBIDDEN=" line. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 3 02:59:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DD40572 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 02:59:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pb0-x22c.google.com (mail-pb0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73AE81DBC for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 02:59:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pb0-f44.google.com with SMTP id rq2so15225606pbb.3 for ; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 18:59:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=9wevrTtkqTnnSFn2XXv9Fc+pZcir5TlJ8SJCHaOsTj0=; b=nZawKNZsz02rvHQOsZl61fPCr+SRw95yuB6rqM8ciIfLBdCo+FS8XKgZ2lPd04OKNP /7lMlMyf3Q8Uac28+P9bSsB6BuVEl5sqOZpyBprR8I2Vx35fWgGOb+0UMD7ABSV1d3BL V0a3ohSW7/r5oGDtitxmJYFru86VAamWFg3wOiI5N/KnrEwh4YQUeT4LLSkCFRz5r7bw yfO0LFKndUaJSZmFlybgYVgtJEqweGM/leveruTM6u3rSARd6M37d+Ef9hcoLLYAVVR/ ADW73+lL4m9kby+KXiMbawnhQmWapre1Gys4dR661wnV5tCBLCOrORZx1Yy061pDX10y EIyw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.180.131 with SMTP id do3mr29540740pbc.91.1388717980987; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 18:59:40 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.92.71 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 18:59:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <52C5ADFB.9040207@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 20:59:40 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: openjdk-7.45.18_1 is forbidden: Triggering a nasty FreeBSD bug. From: Adam Vande More To: Walter Hurry Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 02:59:41 -0000 On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Walter Hurry wrote: > > Well, if you want to risk it, just edit /usr/ports/java/openjdk7/Makefile > and delete the "FORBIDDEN=" line. As already stated, it is not safe to do this unless you're running a kernel with the fix applied. A fresh 10-STABLE is such a kernel. -- Adam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 3 03:03:17 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A791850 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 03:03:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x233.google.com (mail-wg0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::233]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B543C1EDC for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 03:03:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f51.google.com with SMTP id b13so12881733wgh.6 for ; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 19:03:14 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=BPvoUXTT7q28t2fQdQixcZYuTOPLXunQ1PJWC0UbDUY=; b=0l6D3jqyojaYEQH0We5FY19QIfAaAYS0MUBZ3Ar0QYgc9q6BDzXq9mBKblwb54fmUz mWzgD/WCTdlIkYq+1pK4dKKyoHIxTuOilgzbbRX+4/ckpxG57Qjcv4TvfOy03PjwVC6M /d3yfa8zwKyDhswjHXcqmKE03ySfLNuFCfNvcVDfZCWH/1oHFPLJXSv/KMPAja/sHSXZ ceE1zRhRHTLEosuOpLiEZmgNo9f4o3HR3ES2hz35mqSyFOUma34kvvyyuxo+K17nXeSE jNtctOVt+rQCt90Fm1OMJjgpOzx7xxhCsOGEMbotw8SgYpwdeRsqVVTgLPe71dwaALix Z3CQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.36.8 with SMTP id m8mr126207wij.3.1388718194577; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 19:03:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.108.195 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 19:03:14 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.108.195 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 19:03:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <52C5ADFB.9040207@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 21:03:14 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: openjdk-7.45.18_1 is forbidden: Triggering a nasty FreeBSD bug. From: iamatt To: Adam Vande More Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List , Walter Hurry X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 03:03:17 -0000 Just uncomment it and play minecraft with your kid. I have a 9.2 server that we play on (when he lets me) with bukkit server. Life is too short. Or use Linux but have fun either way. On Jan 2, 2014 8:59 PM, "Adam Vande More" wrote: > On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Walter Hurry > wrote: > > > > > Well, if you want to risk it, just edit /usr/ports/java/openjdk7/Makefile > > and delete the "FORBIDDEN=" line. > > > As already stated, it is not safe to do this unless you're running a kernel > with the fix applied. A fresh 10-STABLE is such a kernel. > > -- > Adam > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 3 03:23:26 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B9B52DB8 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 03:23:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-x231.google.com (mail-pd0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D024108B for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 03:23:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f177.google.com with SMTP id q10so14765166pdj.22 for ; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 19:23:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=NNndvaa29x+Wej9AAGeS5mn9RpZxPlK/UnCgbEH5/B8=; b=pXnk/SCy7WMUdT7Luax/Ym7WQewzyInNeEAkssY7Hd/nXmtyI4IYkmj++6itemOIMS II+HX7+B9rJCCztIg1lOb/5AWzTv1K5yOKk5WrXjlSdK0I3rNMOd4s7KQQ+6dFaoTfbN mIX4l7iXWFSJBwpqwfMTqFqVMpyNCt7gC/DreninkneV1Eexnz3FtdnU+c23fsd5biEJ 5js6C4qHNpfHA9vtDjvtHn3/e4/axm1ZJ1K+OTXQR3hF5i05d9avaeJBaZZw4WUGlkWs DzkA8WXiwJdqy/eI7O/QJvNGktfVjnQ5PhQmU+lglgJs/COJnpFuBHfl8XjddLOOwKpt UH4Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.8.66 with SMTP id p2mr91764699paa.129.1388719406189; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 19:23:26 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.92.71 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 19:23:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <52C5ADFB.9040207@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 21:23:26 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: openjdk-7.45.18_1 is forbidden: Triggering a nasty FreeBSD bug. From: Adam Vande More To: iamatt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List , Walter Hurry X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 03:23:26 -0000 On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 9:03 PM, iamatt wrote: > Just uncomment it and play minecraft with your kid. I have a 9.2 server > that we play on (when he lets me) with bukkit server. > Well first off, he'd need to comment the line or delete it. Of more practical concern, yeah, who cares about any private info which might be on the system, or potentially providing a foothold to any other system on your internal network containing such information. Life is too short. Or use Linux I find the two statements to be oxymoronic. -- Adam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 3 03:29:41 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26943F55 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 03:29:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-wg0-x22a.google.com (mail-wg0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF47210C5 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 03:29:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id a1so66804wgh.5 for ; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 19:29:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=7lqKAotzJU5n/dq3+TZjHJPQT/bma1yuQLWrKpsYDy0=; b=muUyuIdsuaw5UTJnNGUaCqROTGt5j/+2XRSzP95ETCdKiUhAaOQlrpuEbhqFOtkEh9 O44QkZBYU9Huai1Z7vPGhSRE0sh+cXFI3a60wi7fbl2P38+V4fCo83Gnpi0lpbAA6luH xsUi670cYvohFesa5TNCHHzSI9qY+JsC9FVii1JNwes0SaX4ROxc6K7QJknWWKXFADO7 u7LT3xxBSz3TFqiBtmr4mIa5kVLLWmS9wpHERngRGuU5JnvW+k7yeTkNj0ZlXxjMy384 cIPLVd0CS9E/vS+mAd0TfxjyWQiHLYNECNXjpR1q5o96S3M+0lPCadY1xNiUTzDFjM+P +1ow== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.176.163 with SMTP id cj3mr58890582wjc.8.1388719779114; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 19:29:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.108.195 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 19:29:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.216.108.195 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 19:29:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <52C5ADFB.9040207@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 21:29:39 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: openjdk-7.45.18_1 is forbidden: Triggering a nasty FreeBSD bug. From: iamatt To: Adam Vande More Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List , Walter Hurry X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 03:29:41 -0000 Well be raised concern about it. Yes you can delete the line and build the port but don't cry if something bad happens. We have ours in a jail on our internal network so it is of no real concern to me. Yeah use Linux if you want to avoid these headaches which come along with trying to run MC on FreeBSD. What's the problem? On Jan 2, 2014 9:23 PM, "Adam Vande More" wrote: > On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 9:03 PM, iamatt wrote: > >> Just uncomment it and play minecraft with your kid. I have a 9.2 server >> that we play on (when he lets me) with bukkit server. >> > Well first off, he'd need to comment the line or delete it. Of more > practical concern, yeah, who cares about any private info which might be on > the system, or potentially providing a foothold to any other system on your > internal network containing such information. > > Life is too short. Or use Linux > > > I find the two statements to be oxymoronic. > > -- > Adam > From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 3 03:50:51 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CFB4290 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 03:50:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pd0-x22a.google.com (mail-pd0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5F3AB123D for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 03:50:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pd0-f170.google.com with SMTP id g10so14979048pdj.1 for ; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 19:50:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=FEABe+elPqAlCEaBzIorevANDXg3cR6wiohwHxMTHcU=; b=XjLmiuouKOZ+yrd04RPoVrHwC1LVmrfVNs2HTYqiLMda0jH9wUXev1pfodqnvFRnsj Rjlyn5qhEnmuL+N4hbOlBCO31LXIuwaZnIoZMJlL5JnwSOi3o50QJnA645ghzLGQ3+Va ICLR3x7FX0PJF/j21MZ/adLC73/yFLCHwrRcTHOo0MwQt4URdo40EY2GPlYkJf6dhit8 c6y6PpTiu4ZxjvVYEgQBw1PvfjPSVbD78y9Dvole/ycTabvT2Lx0PsTWHuO29hCQFNIl W1cHOLH3y5sdJyrc/6zsKO17ya8TI9t3Puu0W9FIKIz2veBilw3c+q7lMWxyLMz2Hm3G mWtw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.66.138.40 with SMTP id qn8mr925053pab.154.1388721050976; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 19:50:50 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.70.92.71 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Jan 2014 19:50:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <52C5ADFB.9040207@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2014 21:50:50 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: openjdk-7.45.18_1 is forbidden: Triggering a nasty FreeBSD bug. From: Adam Vande More To: iamatt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List , Walter Hurry X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 03:50:51 -0000 On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 9:29 PM, iamatt wrote: > We have ours in a jail on our internal network so it is of no real concern > to me. > It would be quite a concern of mine if said jail had outbound Internet access. Otherwise, only something to be aware of considering the illustre of java's security problem in the last couple years. > Yeah use Linux if you want to avoid these headaches which come along > with trying to run MC on FreeBSD. What's the problem? > Java or Linux, your pick. MC is a great game, just wish they had chosen a different platform. -- Adam From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 3 06:22:33 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE526766 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 06:22:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qe0-x22d.google.com (mail-qe0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c02::22d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86F6F1CE9 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 06:22:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qe0-f45.google.com with SMTP id 6so15371293qea.18 for ; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 22:22:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=DwtaylTS2Gbaqcme4p9iJZAO8M3ld4VysP/3CE4CAN0=; b=gEkB0XuhhU3LFPpBcqiJJhiEJE9mTXcLFmPA4Au8Z/eGr6JNvHBXCjRe3R7Lls+a9H GRs2HvSdZki/bPOVyv1Ym6tdv2T305X2mF/Du1UVw8dDj/0dZ9LnpEA3slqc8BUv4uXV Bt9sFOAhfO2WUY37t2bwhyvK8xSaMIVrEaO8FUVnZebhNTA/F0EA7fy9q91B2JYxph9n 8Kxac6QR6I6FLnpDdZG/rPqJq4iKwuxDVoEbJeQUeRKi28wvWHxSjwZVDhwScNwpF3ag OyULqwkXglZXmwwLfD6ksesflyDhIkb94CU0mg9YXj74mIqVGqbK7Ra7jp0ToIOX6NvO /NtA== X-Received: by 10.229.13.133 with SMTP id c5mr143853290qca.22.1388730152757; Thu, 02 Jan 2014 22:22:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ool-44c0cdb5.dyn.optonline.net. [68.192.205.181]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id s14sm75276622qad.20.2014.01.02.22.22.31 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Thu, 02 Jan 2014 22:22:32 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52C6572F.9090901@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 01:22:39 -0500 From: Stephen Cook User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Adam Vande More , Walter Hurry Subject: Re: openjdk-7.45.18_1 is forbidden: Triggering a nasty FreeBSD bug. References: <52C5ADFB.9040207@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FreeBSD Questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 06:22:33 -0000 On 1/2/2014 9:59 PM, Adam Vande More wrote: > On Thu, Jan 2, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Walter Hurry wrote: > >> Well, if you want to risk it, just edit /usr/ports/java/openjdk7/Makefile >> and delete the "FORBIDDEN=" line. > As already stated, it is not safe to do this unless you're running a kernel > with the fix applied. A fresh 10-STABLE is such a kernel. I don't feel comfortable with my knowledge to run something that is not RELEASE yet. Is there a way to get the fix on 9.2? Can anyone point me to the bug(s) in question, so I can see what is going on / what I'm risking? I can also just run the Minecraft server on my PC, and open the router to let her friends play with her too. It is not as ideal though, because if I'm working I might have to cut them off. -- Stephen From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 3 07:02:06 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D9DCEA6 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 07:02:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp6.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93FBA1F14 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 07:02:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from seedling.black-earth.co.uk (seedling.black-earth.co.uk [81.2.117.99]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s03720lR076896 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 07:02:01 GMT (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.8.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk s03720lR076896 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/s03720lR076896; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none Message-ID: <52C66068.3070309@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 07:02:00 +0000 From: Matthew Seaman User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: openjdk-7.45.18_1 is forbidden: Triggering a nasty FreeBSD bug. References: <52C5ADFB.9040207@gmail.com> <52C604E1.7020106@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <52C604E1.7020106@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WOOP9sWxEQM1kMRqpf0tELBAbQkEwXac5" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00, DCC_CHECK autolearn=no version=3.3.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 07:02:06 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --WOOP9sWxEQM1kMRqpf0tELBAbQkEwXac5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 03/01/2014 00:31, Stephen Cook wrote: > I can't find what the actual bug is... I mean, if it will just make > Minecraft unstable it is no big deal, I want to play with my kid. If it= > erases the hard drive or lights something on fire I can wait. Running java will cause your FreeBSD machine to panic and reboot. It's a problem in FreeBSD that the latest versions of java have tickled. The 10.0-rc4 builds contain a fix as do STABLE-10 and STABLE-9. Not sure if that's been MFC'd to STABLE-8 yet, and it hasn't been applied to any of the RELEASE branches yet. This is the fix to HEAD: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=3Drevision&revision=3D259951 Cheers, Matthew --=20 Dr Matthew J Seaman MA, D.Phil. PGP: http://www.infracaninophile.co.uk/pgpkey --WOOP9sWxEQM1kMRqpf0tELBAbQkEwXac5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJSxmBoXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATWLkQAK38ZHqDQyyTUl2cdk6bBtxT xf5nJrf0AjvSISTzVQL5qpfkse2z/GaUEtnmlpnKYOe7KrAYZmQYBRe1UCOk8B0C +i/3BIdIyibrnjIggJyE8Ld/jzwnaSK5ekjXsJLprmm4LK4Xt+Z0lffEnrYmmlTR Wk5LvK0RT2Y/ua1N4q9MaCQTD5KB9CtBMdtIdYTw33DDBrrYn3rVmA0KJ1HU5D9D 2mKetA47DRIFNRdWXvPeml7foVKUVXGyH+3OVWpC4sGRug9N+e0AHQmj00WG3aLb 4IY7vfcSNRQwFrSZ+GASfURRm4eY6l53RA/vdgoPFKSWiv+mDNy0IV2sbXXLQvLs Y8oVeTQaF+K5/f2OCCCsRF9ub2v7yVmWC4HSZtxK57BZ7av4LCW9LlMmYTOmVKAr I5HfcshhqBl0l2mBcXYiT1IM/me3vDANScTEFWOyYrMijjcps3sCJU+/WL3L2kNR CDCvmducgKQXdu2PNAP/tsjOWW/7Rof2cT4bKA5k1v9M6R41M6utb8MWBSSNdHcd xTwqZmzIZdvLr0WrsrPejdjdhUZBAZzgRJzHS+Y8CDtjh+6Vas2jWu1wb8ct3ozw M5Q7qIuPFd7fGdKttZSuctx9ZJAq18fL79kAYrg0wHCIsr9WN/GW64uTc4bskvNZ K2LyLK1oh4aCIEyY8iMV =xFgU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WOOP9sWxEQM1kMRqpf0tELBAbQkEwXac5-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 3 07:17:44 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 55C8B5EF for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 07:17:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mailrelay003.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay003.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.6.53]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DEFD51068 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 07:17:43 +0000 (UTC) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlgGADBjxlJtgAdA/2dsb2JhbABYgws4umcXdIJYDhxfNAUlN4gIAZoBqRWSNIETBJgWgTGQZIMuOw Received: from 64.7-128-109.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO FreeBSD-Gallery.desmojunkies.dyndns-remote.com) ([109.128.7.64]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 03 Jan 2014 08:17:36 +0100 Received: from FreeBSD-Gallery.desmojunkies.dyndns-remote.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by FreeBSD-Gallery.desmojunkies.dyndns-remote.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s037JhUX039348 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 08:19:44 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from alain.fabry@belgacom.net) Received: (from afabry@localhost) by FreeBSD-Gallery.desmojunkies.dyndns-remote.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id s037Jh1N039347 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 08:19:43 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from alain.fabry@belgacom.net) X-Authentication-Warning: FreeBSD-Gallery.desmojunkies.dyndns-remote.com: afabry set sender to alain.fabry@belgacom.net using -f Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 08:19:43 +0100 From: "Alain G. Fabry" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Ghostscript9 install failure Message-ID: <20140103071943.GA39329@FreeBSD-Gallery.desmojunkies.dyndns-remote.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.22 (2013-10-16) X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 07:17:44 -0000 As a dependancy for ImageMagic, I'm trying to install ghostscript9, but I get an install failure. Please advice. % uname -a FreeBSD xxxxxx 9.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE #0 r255898: Thu Sep 26 22:50:31 UTC 2013 root@bake.isc.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 % make install clean ...... gmake[2]: warning: Clock skew detected. Your build may be incomplete. gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript9/work/ghostscript-9.06' gmake GS_XE=./sobin/libgs.so.9.06 DISPLAY_DEV=./soobj/display.dev STDIO_IMPLEMENTATION=c BUILDDIRPREFIX=so GENOPT='' LDFLAGS='-L/usr/local/lib -pthread'\ CFLAGS='-O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -DUPD_SIGNAL=0 -I. -I/usr/ports/print/ghostscript9/work/ghostscript-9.06/lcms/include -I/usr/local/include/libpng -I/usr/ports/print/ghostscript9/work/ghostscript-9.06/openjpeg/libopenjpeg -I/usr/ports/print/ghostscript9/work/ghostscript-9.06/openjpeg -I/usr/local/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wundef -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wwrite-strings -Wno-strict-aliasing -Wdeclaration-after-statement -fno-builtin -fno-common -DHAVE_STDINT_H=1 -DHAVE_DIRENT_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_DIR_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TIME_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TIMES_H=1 -DGX_COLOR_INDEX_TYPE="unsigned long int" -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -DUSE_LIBICONV_GNU -DUSE_LIBPAPER -I/usr/local/include -DGS_DEVS_SHARED -DGS_DEVS_SHARED_DIR=\"/usr/local/lib/ghostscript/9.06\" -DA4' prefix=/usr/local\ ./sobin/gsc ./sobin/gsx gmake[2]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript9/work/ghostscript-9.06' rm -f ./sobin/libgs.so.9 ln -s libgs.so.9.06 ./sobin/libgs.so.9 rm -f ./sobin/libgs.so ln -s libgs.so.9.06 ./sobin/libgs.so cc -DHAVE_MKSTEMP -DHAVE_FONTCONFIG -DHAVE_LIBIDN -DHAVE_SETLOCALE -DHAVE_SSE2 -DHAVE_STRERROR -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -DUPD_SIGNAL=0 -I. -I/usr/ports/print/ghostscript9/work/ghostscript-9.06/lcms/include -I/usr/local/include/libpng -I/usr/ports/print/ghostscript9/work/ghostscript-9.06/openjpeg/libopenjpeg -I/usr/ports/print/ghostscript9/work/ghostscript-9.06/openjpeg -I/usr/local/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -Wundef -Wmissing-declarations -Wmissing-prototypes -Wwrite-strings -Wno-strict-aliasing -Wdeclaration-after-statement -fno-builtin -fno-common -DHAVE_STDINT_H=1 -DHAVE_DIRENT_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_DIR_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TIME_H=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TIMES_H=1 -DGX_COLOR_INDEX_TYPE="unsigned long int" -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing -DUSE_LIBICONV_GNU -DUSE_LIBPAPER -I/usr/local/include -DGS_DEVS_SHARED -DGS_DEVS_SHARED_DIR=\"/usr/local/lib/ghostscript/9.06\" -DA4 -I./soobj -I./base -DWHICH_CMS="lcms2" -g -o ./sobin/gsc ./psi/dxmainc.c \ -L./sobin -lgs ./sobin/libgs.so: undefined reference to `gdev_vector_fill_triangle' ./sobin/libgs.so: undefined reference to `gdev_vector_fill_rectangle' ./sobin/libgs.so: undefined reference to `gdev_vector_fill_parallelogram' ./sobin/libgs.so: undefined reference to `gdev_vector_end_image' ./sobin/libgs.so: undefined reference to `gdev_vector_update_log_op' ./sobin/libgs.so: undefined reference to `st_device_vector' ./sobin/libgs.so: undefined reference to `gdev_vector_stroke_path' ./sobin/libgs.so: undefined reference to `gdev_vector_dorect' ./sobin/libgs.so: undefined reference to `gdev_vector_fill_trapezoid' ./sobin/libgs.so: undefined reference to `gdev_vector_update_fill_color' ./sobin/libgs.so: undefined reference to `gdev_vector_close_file' ./sobin/libgs.so: undefined reference to `gdev_vector_fill_path' ./sobin/libgs.so: undefined reference to `gdev_vector_update_clip_path' ./sobin/libgs.so: undefined reference to `gdev_prn_set_procs_planar' ./sobin/libgs.so: undefined reference to `gdev_vector_get_params' ./sobin/libgs.so: undefined reference to `gdev_vector_begin_image' ./sobin/libgs.so: undefined reference to `st_vector_image_enum' ./sobin/libgs.so: undefined reference to `gdev_vector_put_params' ./sobin/libgs.so: undefined reference to `gdev_vector_open_file_options' ./sobin/libgs.so: undefined reference to `gdev_vector_reset' ./sobin/libgs.so: undefined reference to `gdev_vector_init' gmake[2]: *** [sobin/gsc] Error 1 gmake[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript9/work/ghostscript-9.06' gmake[1]: *** [so-subtarget] Error 2 gmake[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/ports/print/ghostscript9/work/ghostscript-9.06' gmake: *** [so] Error 2 *** [do-build] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/print/ghostscript9. *** [install] Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/print/ghostscript9. Many thxs in advance, Alain From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 3 09:59:59 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A2AC53E for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 09:59:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qe0-x22f.google.com (mail-qe0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c02::22f]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AB281CC3 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 09:59:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qe0-f47.google.com with SMTP id t7so15212987qeb.20 for ; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 01:59:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=tE1bKahzNZdqdGAs06KiPdfC8+rloPQuGoYmW/tMu24=; b=n2khNQclmY6uP9Y8OOPHY7wdfEmIEOWwgkln8kL152FanyIsUWW9YZcuv4lS/NejuA ve9Isz1HSlrZhrD7b24Gc/nWaJv4GmMXqOSH93CT59IELfyjYV0YHIzbT4y3QQLZP9UU FgMrszxEspmmBR4k6z5TPO1qve6V061gCHlUGAbH98o/h7khmVa1t9RuJjpR1ZPQ6ZFP ETh80zuBhW1/zVI0MUi40ze4v5OlOhs/opAe578RvCGMF0q6AQ/AOwRZnO3AishS3CBF a6zmbx/5Ke1zOTf/hfvMiBKzOv2VfItrsEl8Mu5vGi2GJ02JhzWO0bXqKPb2UbBPmaRz y54w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.46.8 with SMTP id h8mr147003333qaf.49.1388743198387; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 01:59:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.98.69 with HTTP; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 01:59:58 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 11:59:58 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Need a hand for resolving package installation errors on NanoBSD From: Dimitar Vassilev To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 09:59:59 -0000 Happy new year all, I'm having issues with installing packages on a nanobsd image using the cust_pkg function in the script itself. Logs from the failed installations are located at http://playground.oldbonez.net/pkg3 ( most recent) http://playground.oldbonez.net/pkg_fail2 (previous attempt) Both fail with a similar error + echo 'FAILED: Nothing happened on this pass' FAILED: Nothing happened on this pass + exit 2 As far as I understand this is related to the following function in the script # Count & report how many we have to install todo=`ls ${NANO_WORLDDIR}/Pkg | wc -l` echo "=== TODO: $todo" ls ${NANO_WORLDDIR}/Pkg echo "===" while true do # Record how many we have now have=`ls ${NANO_WORLDDIR}/var/db/pkg | wc -l` # Attempt to install more packages # ...but no more than 200 at a time due to pkg_add's internal # limitations. chroot ${NANO_WORLDDIR} sh -c \ 'ls Pkg/*tbz | xargs -n 200 pkg_add -F' || true # See what that got us now=`ls ${NANO_WORLDDIR}/var/db/pkg | wc -l` echo "=== NOW $now" ls ${NANO_WORLDDIR}/var/db/pkg echo "===" if [ $now -eq $todo ] ; then echo "DONE $now packages" break elif [ $now -eq $have ] ; then echo "FAILED: Nothing happened on this pass" exit 2 fi done rm -rf ${NANO_WORLDDIR}/Pkg However I have placed all the packages and their dependencies in the same place and with the same permissions 644. Running the whole process as root. Any help with resolving this is appreciated. Please put my name in to or CC in order to catch your response quicker. Thanks! Best regards, Dimitar From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 3 13:11:15 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E408E62 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 13:11:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B33B81A17 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 13:11:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.82) for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1Vz4Wu-001XGA-NR>; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 14:11:12 +0100 Received: from f052132228.adsl.alicedsl.de ([78.52.132.228] helo=thor.walstatt.dyndns.org) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.82) for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1Vz4Wu-001wv5-IO>; Fri, 03 Jan 2014 14:11:12 +0100 Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 14:11:11 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" To: FreeBSD Questions Subject: texlive: rehash doesn't search local paths! Message-ID: <20140103141111.4df9c039@thor.walstatt.dyndns.org> Organization: FU Berlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.9.3 (GTK+ 2.24.22; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Sig_//gBvpSIBy7N69W.1gOUQL10"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Originating-IP: 78.52.132.228 X-ZEDAT-Hint: A X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 13:11:15 -0000 --Sig_//gBvpSIBy7N69W.1gOUQL10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On an experimental installation, I try to swith from print/teTeX to print/texlive-full. Local TeXT-written projects, important papers, do not work anymore after that switch although I find most of the *.sty package files installed by TeXlive. I tried to perform "texhash". But that tool is now, in contrary to the teTeX version of tha particular software, not searching local paths anymore. I have a lot of stuff in ~/.texmf-local. I found that texlive is obviously installing its own local config folder, it is in my case .texlive2012 Well, I copied the content of .texmf-local into .texlive2012/texmf-local (avoiding the leading "dot") and reran texhash, texconfig rehash, mktexlsr. None seem to remedy the problem that I face with several important packages like glossary/glossaries, jurabib. Running that tool (texhash, i.e.) only searches system paths: texhash: /usr/local/share/texmf: directory not writable. Skipping... texhash: /usr/local/share/texmf-config: directory not writable. Skipping... texhash: /usr/local/share/texmf-dist: directory not writable. Skipping... texhash: /usr/local/share/texmf-var: directory not writable. Skipping... texhash: Done. Problem in my LaTeX projects looks like this: (/home/ohartmann/.texlive2012/texmf-config/tex/latex/glossaries/glossary-hy= pern av.sty) (/home/ohartmann/.texlive2012/texmf-config/tex/latex/glossaries/glossary-li= st.s ty) (/home/ohartmann/.texlive2012/texmf-config/tex/latex/glossaries/glossary-lo= ng.s ty) (/home/ohartmann/.texlive2012/texmf-config/tex/latex/glossaries/glossary-su= per. sty (/usr/local/share/texmf-dist/tex/latex/supertabular/supertabular.sty)) (/home/ohartmann/.texlive2012/texmf-config/tex/latex/glossaries/glossary-tr= ee.s ty)) (./akronyme.tex) (./glossar.tex) (./symbole.tex)) * commenting out several "faulty" \usepackage{} statement simply jumps to a next fault package and at the point I have no idea what TeX is complaining about, since the "*" at the end of the fault signals usually some kind of none-existent file/.sty/package. I'm new to TeXlive and before the frustration starts to take over I'll ask for some advice, I think I'm missing something essential here since I never used TeXlive before. Is there any cure? Thanks in advance, Oliver=20 --Sig_//gBvpSIBy7N69W.1gOUQL10 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJSxrbwAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8010H/0Fjf2ncGPcGDDp5mYs5Nbz9 hunjZVfcArgjuhZoNWhMyLdQTkoIdI9gD5TCRPyQweFx6InVpf8+KwDR5h1da/KA Kv3TXaljKc0NAX/UxOS3LYnG4FjztElM3xw8eJAyu4XS7pIYpvgbv38+Cj9raGhE EKbluYqhTPPkf/40kzYaHkMPwChQC7B/0j3Of8CIYzftgozTcTBwEaQiC9ez9qnt vl8V20NMnQS/iys5AmN/Pr28yP6f/DCZWZv0VRrkreVTxL6INr62JDVwKRbn2wo9 c6saEbMfB8ITkpjGnZ9wI6uQmlkbuFDVla9dhjTW2mwjt9S5w6JyeX2Vg6NFhYo= =3vsS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_//gBvpSIBy7N69W.1gOUQL10-- From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 3 15:30:17 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB52CBE4 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 15:30:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail9.mlgnusa.com (mail9.mlgnusa.com [194.19.244.216]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6225716C2 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 15:30:16 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=default; d=mlgnusa.com; h=Date:To:From:Reply-to:Subject:Message-ID:Sender:MIME-Version:Content-Type; i=info=3Dhitputovanja.rs@mlgnusa.com; bh=RdvlxB7rAJHYpV8kBikYxfRSiUA=; b=F5FLK+CdSqQOR8kGq5H/iGOHuWi8aLN9Rrinl3bOoNDMCH2epG5SordCsc424GvKymIkBF2mqYOT NIbnkroCYOFsgVpkTUFDjU6h0nUIrB6M2lv8muwVKOfV98iDHVF46P62Sv9l9SreRJnrwommC1XK dgxkfUp9lrC5zXfI72s= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=default; d=mlgnusa.com; b=Ceiflg4iSZkTNJ0jaeQrgJRfnbQ5e/tyq6Moq7iG0OajGeTa55miHkfXH0B56zoYVUZnt5PYzglH +Ut1nItahsL2P5g0eG1s/f0nerG+Kd3P/uxQVsy3zSCRq2RY/f/Q2D44DmiZuAxiE90ta4dRSE5f CdvnNzxuyki0fYSTYpA=; Received: by mail9.mlgnusa.com id horboi1fblcf for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 17:20:04 +0200 (envelope-from ) Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 17:20:04 +0200 To: questions@FreeBSD.org From: Hit Putovanja Subject: Newsletter Hit Putovanja #2: Confirm Your Subscription Message-ID: <96c624ffb84eb383d1360d03ad6b4346@mlgnusa.com> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: MailiGen Subscribe Mailer Sender: "Hit Putovanja" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset = "utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: Hit Putovanja List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 15:30:17 -0000 Newsletter Hit Putovanja #2 ------------------------------------------------ Click here to confirm your subscription to our list.: http://list.mlgnusa.com/subscribe/confirm?u=d6368eb1ada0146fbabee40e79f3b4e4&id=d2994a5d&e=9f483a3b&ln=en ------------------------------------------------ If you received this email by mistake, simply delete it. You won't be subscribed if you don't click the confirmation link above. For questions about this list, please contact: [1]info@hitputovanja.rs Links: 1. info@hitputovanja.rs From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 3 16:41:58 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2442C21D for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 16:41:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from scummserver.lechindianer.de (scummserver.lechindianer.de [83.169.44.49]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DA2361D84 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 16:41:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.178.46] (dslb-084-057-031-138.pools.arcor-ip.net [84.57.31.138]) by scummserver.lechindianer.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D7A71DB8030 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 17:33:17 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <52C6E64A.3030803@lechindianer.de> Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 17:33:14 +0100 From: Pascal Schmid User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Raspberry pie and beagle bone black References: <01FA6D7F-6F3F-4EDB-AA14-F2941CE6563C@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <01FA6D7F-6F3F-4EDB-AA14-F2941CE6563C@gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 16:41:58 -0000 On 01/03/2014 02:24 AM, Joshua Smith wrote: > Hello list, > I was lucky enough to receive a raspberry pie and a beagle bone black recently and have been reading a bit about running freebsd on both. However most of the reading I've been able to find with google is a bit dated. Is there a canonical source for information on either platform? > > > > Thanks, > -- > Josh Smith > KD8HRX > > Email/jabber: juicewvu@gmail.com > > Sent from my iPhone. > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > Hi, a good point to start would be: https://github.com/kientzle/crochet-freebsd and https://wiki.freebsd.org/FreeBSD/arm Hope it helps From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 3 18:38:10 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 69631D7C for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 18:38:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail12.mlgnsrv.com (mail12.mlgnsrv.com [62.63.157.248]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 205E016DA for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 18:38:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=default; d=mlgnsrv.com; h=Date:To:From:Reply-to:Subject:Message-ID:Sender:MIME-Version:Content-Type; i=info=3Dhitputovanja.rs@mlgnsrv.com; bh=BSOK0x1VkquQQ2F9/eVAW/TROKY=; b=L5p1gbv1EUPoOl8ZVbLcR0wQJQaFIrnBReJjuHZk8D4L53xaeFR+FnVdZZF1A49Ej9CO48Curhtm ii8l4HNNmWHiapBi2RTMCI3UIM8tiXuPkQ+iB5gKhVY6MJZderARKh1GUpVdiZztBHifpCkBsPpY ONLIfp25G2i9QG2glnc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=default; d=mlgnsrv.com; b=jM1yy9cHYOiPSpxgAoSL8jckdFtZP2sJI0qoTt4E4OUL7b84LoUGQiriByCw7B5armec7Fm8/WjM Fs5JIBIKB7F8S5iKiNrY3XtopZm7zA10hFNqtzcc3GGS23+WTij9c7xvr5f2yfCGFIa2R/mYsy2Z Ok8MkvqOTlJV4WxiyZ0=; Received: by mail12.mlgnsrv.com id hos1p41fblcl for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 20:28:00 +0200 (envelope-from ) Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 20:28:00 +0200 To: questions@FreeBSD.org From: Hit Putovanja Subject: Newsletter Hit Putovanja #2: Subscription Confirmed Message-ID: X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: MailiGen Subscribe Mailer Sender: "Hit Putovanja" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset = "utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: Hit Putovanja List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 18:38:10 -0000 Newsletter Hit Putovanja #2 ------------------------------------------------ Your subscription to our list has been confirmed. For your records, here is a copy of the information you submitted to us... ----------------------------------- Email Address:questions@FreeBSD.org ----------------------------------- If you wish to stop receiving our emails, you can unsubscribe by clicking here. http://list.mlgnusa.com/unsubscribe?u=d6368eb1ada0146fbabee40e79f3b4e4&id=d2994a5d&e=9f483a3b From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 3 18:58:57 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E56A621 for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 18:58:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail9.mlgnsrv.com (mail9.mlgnsrv.com [194.19.244.154]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B985A185D for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 18:58:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; s=default; d=mlgnsrv.com; h=Date:To:From:Reply-to:Subject:Message-ID:Sender:MIME-Version:Content-Type; i=info=3Dhitputovanja.rs@mlgnsrv.com; bh=uMf0d2gfmb+tR5MqmA1nPCnFMYU=; b=uVYkCK5sMIotjSZnAkNUWcR16fCf4dXgL85IqzGA0MD3jz1ATrpXF6gwO7LEAB5GYZOriPD/XiRF 2ITXiVNoU7UaoTNbwjMKN9G9JXk6o+XjBQHVlAOGkkMR5zd/7TMi0qNWSIXm9Liol/0eXGugRrjl 1zPXzqiCOSmZbiU9COc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; q=dns; s=default; d=mlgnsrv.com; b=it+9jHI1scvwDlw8sAGlmN7x5OvdYo4QYGj1gAgffJLbJdQZwhfkd0Ie1KFVs1Xb5F+hzWRr+b54 L3hXgwBzh8+caekG97QthNsbWz5GjYjeL86S6ZU8OYGpu019bvD4KtvIHT0Bm7lmzUwAhFeOfEEo utfmAR/nue11aTwaWoE=; Received: by mail9.mlgnsrv.com id hos4701fblca for ; Fri, 3 Jan 2014 20:48:49 +0200 (envelope-from ) Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2014 20:48:49 +0200 To: questions@FreeBSD.org From: Hit Putovanja Subject: Newsletter Hit Putovanja #2: Contact unsubscribed Message-ID: <218ee4ab1b56a58528d4b5efc7e3a2a7@mlgnsrv.com> X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: MailiGen Subscribe Mailer Sender: "Hit Putovanja" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset = "utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: Hit Putovanja List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2014 18:58:57 -0000 Newsletter Hit Putovanja #2 ------------------------------------------------ We have removed your email address from our list. We're sorry to see you go.   ----------------------------------- Did you forward your email to a friend, and they accidentally clicked the unsubscribe link? If this was a mistake, you can re-subscribe at: http://list.mlgnusa.com/subscribe?u=d6368eb1ada0146fbabee40e79f3b4e4&id=d2994a5d ----------------------------------- For questions or comments, please contact us at: info@hitputovanja.rs From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 4 08:43:23 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 86ED0BDC for ; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 08:43:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-qa0-x231.google.com (mail-qa0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c00::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4567F1F8D for ; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 08:43:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-qa0-f49.google.com with SMTP id ii20so1288439qab.15 for ; Sat, 04 Jan 2014 00:43:22 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=oiayKI8gPwnzJJrqdqCvRvl0cQY1jlv5MjkEWXD30h8=; b=fVz4hxlmnMQtIhlvI3L5ZuT4kAwqOF5GlCxVp45woXY+HTz6CKyzfQLCzeyLknDc/P CdSOH1XBWdTX4rPIc3Ukj4PO2dVAoBFo79T0uwm6aq/e8vdHRoaQw/cPPpQAdUS4HGrI iQhMpQEuXpLQtKXhC91iEZpk9JPSQnDzNFz/3zhA4qfmpjBP3NMZhNSVEmN1yLZCl1j6 ESC+h8VYMKFzM9F/vWrgd0NCgq9usp72PFwJrjzv6ztuHREzJRt1stHq3jk9RdkXw0G5 WIJxOeD+eV8+jB59ApOFvesV/t1zga/RCx+INi9/BAbcv0EZifeF4r92WBodlb+nqL+8 o/UQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.229.249.66 with SMTP id mj2mr154761641qcb.4.1388825002510; Sat, 04 Jan 2014 00:43:22 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.224.98.69 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 00:43:22 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2014 10:43:22 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Need a hand for resolving package installation errors on NanoBSD From: Dimitar Vassilev To: FreeBSD Questions Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 08:43:23 -0000 Hi all, For the record, I managed to build the packages with a bit of manual stop and check.Turned out I had some packages missing, duplicated or obsolete. 32 bit jail and portmaster helped me a lot. Once you're about to begin the next build of packages, remember to archive and truncate /usr/ports/packages/All directory in the jail/build host, so that you're not spending 3-4 hours wondering why the installation of package X failed. Extra care should be taken when one is updating perl/php/mysql/berkley db /ruby et all. Full rebuild of packages/modules in that case is recommended. Have a nice week-end! Best regards, Dimitar From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 4 10:34:11 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3BA6495 for ; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 10:34:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from sam.nabble.com (sam.nabble.com [216.139.236.26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6EE21623 for ; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 10:34:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.236.26] (helo=sam.nabble.com) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VzOYU-0004sx-0d for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Sat, 04 Jan 2014 02:34:10 -0800 Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2014 02:34:10 -0800 (PST) From: halieus To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1388831650014-5873697.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <525E5C25.5070305@netfence.it> References: <525E5C25.5070305@netfence.it> Subject: Re: NFSv4 security MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 10:34:11 -0000 Hello av, did you get any response? I discovered the same behaviour as you (in 9.1-RELEASE, 9.2-RELEASE und 10.0-RC4). I too think that this is a security problem. Any advice? Regards, peter -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/NFSv4-security-tp5852289p5873697.html Sent from the freebsd-questions mailing list archive at Nabble.com. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 4 12:12:23 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CFBA19E for ; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 12:12:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.bsdbox.co (122-149-22-79.static.dsl.dodo.com.au [122.149.22.79]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5407B1CF7 for ; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 12:12:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.0.0.4] (122-149-22-79.static.dsl.dodo.com.au [122.149.22.79]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.bsdbox.co (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4872E238BF6 for ; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 12:12:11 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <52C7FA94.5020207@bsdbox.co> Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 23:12:04 +1100 From: nano User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: 9.0-RELEASE and jails Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 12:12:23 -0000 My VPS runs 9.0-RELEASE, which is making jail setup difficult (for me). I could only ezjail-admin install 8.4-RELEASE because I could not find the 9.0-RELEASE base.txz anywhere. This made updating the basejail nigh impossible because it was trying to update host kernel version (9.0-RELEASE) when the jail world was 8.4-RELEASE. I thought I would give qjail a try, but so far am unable to even install a basejail with that utility. I've only ever administered jails with ezjail, so am in need of some help. What are my options to get a couple (up-to-date) jails setup on this host? Thanks. -- syn.bsdbox.co From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 4 15:12:47 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 56379621 for ; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 15:12:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bs1.fjl.org.uk (bs1.fjl.org.uk [84.45.41.196]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1A271878 for ; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 15:12:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.35] (host86-150-242-158.range86-150.btcentralplus.com [86.150.242.158]) (authenticated bits=0) by bs1.fjl.org.uk (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id s04FCbkj092766 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 15:12:37 GMT (envelope-from frank2@fjl.co.uk) Message-ID: <52C824E5.5010200@fjl.co.uk> Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 15:12:37 +0000 From: Frank Leonhardt User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 9.0-RELEASE and jails References: <52C7FA94.5020207@bsdbox.co> In-Reply-To: <52C7FA94.5020207@bsdbox.co> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 15:12:47 -0000 On 04/01/2014 12:12, nano wrote: > My VPS runs 9.0-RELEASE, which is making jail setup difficult (for me). > > I could only ezjail-admin install 8.4-RELEASE because I could not find > the 9.0-RELEASE base.txz anywhere. This made updating the basejail > nigh impossible because it was trying to update host kernel version > (9.0-RELEASE) when the jail world was 8.4-RELEASE. I thought I would > give qjail a try, but so far am unable to even install a basejail with > that utility. > > I've only ever administered jails with ezjail, so am in need of some > help. What are my options to get a couple (up-to-date) jails setup on > this host? Thanks. > Funnily enough, I never got on with ezjail and I just configure them with a few lines in rc.conf. I believe that ezjail is useful if you have a high number of jails running, and you want to manage them. If you only have a few and can edit a text file. The handbook Chapter 15 has all the information you need; possibly a bit too much! The concept is that you just make a directory, copy what you want to in it (like all the files on a live FreeBSD system), add a few lines describing it to rc.conf (i.e. the name, directory and IP address you want to pass through) and "run" it using "jail". Yes, you can do an buildworld+installworld if you want to get the environment in that way but it's just a bunch of files. I'm happily running "images" of earlier FreeBSD systems in jails on later ones - the main box I use for this happens to be 9.0 running 7.x and 8.x systems. I can't see what you're trying to do with ezjail, but I don't know ezjail at all well. Feel free to email me directly if you have a specific problem. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 4 16:43:55 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 15E8D27C for ; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 16:43:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mp1-smtp-5.eutelia.it (mp1-smtp-5.eutelia.it [62.94.10.165]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD75E1EB9 for ; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 16:43:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ns2.biolchim.it (ip-188-188.sn2.eutelia.it [83.211.188.188]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mp1-smtp-5.eutelia.it (Eutelia) with ESMTP id 4423E168DBA for ; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 17:17:35 +0100 (CET) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-185-246.41-151.net24.it [151.41.246.185]) (authenticated bits=0) by ns2.biolchim.it (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s04GHLsj044958 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 17:17:26 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: ns2.biolchim.it: Host adsl-ull-185-246.41-151.net24.it [151.41.246.185] claimed to be soth.ventu Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s04GHCNa007390; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 17:17:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <52C83408.3070101@netfence.it> Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 17:17:12 +0100 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: NFSv4 security References: <525E5C25.5070305@netfence.it> <1388831650014-5873697.post@n5.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <1388831650014-5873697.post@n5.nabble.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (ns2.biolchim.it [192.168.2.203]); Sat, 04 Jan 2014 17:17:27 +0100 (CET) X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.74 Cc: peter@halieus.de X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 16:43:55 -0000 On 01/04/14 11:34, halieus wrote: > Hello av, > > did you get any response? Unfortunately not :( > Any advice? I just went back to plain old NFSv3. Please, let me know if you discover something. bye av. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 4 19:31:07 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0AAF79F4 for ; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 19:31:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from harbor.safeport.com (harbor.safeport.com [204.107.128.78]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C33E51A98 for ; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 19:31:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bucksport.safeport.com (bucksport.safeport.com [198.74.231.101]) by harbor.safeport.com (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id s04JJLEv052590 for ; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 14:19:21 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from doug@safeport.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2014 14:19:21 -0500 (EST) From: doug@safeport.com To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Xorg support question Message-ID: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 19:31:07 -0000 I have several questions so I apologize that this might ramble a bit. KMS: Is this is an Intel only thing, implemented in the video card? Is there a way to tell if an on-board card has this. I have two laptops and two (really cheap) desktop computers. The systems with KMS are not always the newest. As far as I can tell Intel develops for Windows and Linux. So is avoiding Intel graphics the thing to do? As an aside, hats off to the X developers, you have the most complex and thankless 'job' there is in FreeBSD land. Really switching to text mode from graphics is a complex issue (I know it is, or it would have been solved long ago). Perhaps someone at Intel is a Linux fan. Okay sorry for that but I feel better now :) Intel driver: I assume support has passed the ironlake card by. It does not work on Xorg 7.7 and the VESA driver while recognizing the card perfectly will only ante up 1026x768. I and followed all Intel suggestions and used cvt, gtf, and xrandr to no avail. The question here is: Is there a way to take the output of pciconf and relate it to a vendor card designation? The way I read the man page for the Intel driver, ironlake should be supported, but it is not. The last more general question is: Is there a way to avoid Intel graphics and RealteK wireless since neither seems to be on the 'to be supported' queue. I trust this was not too much to a rant, I did not intend it that way. The resolution and/or command name might be in error because I am writing this from memory as my laptop with the ironlake is not with me at the moment. Thank you for any thoughts and/or help _____ Douglas Denault http://www.safeport.com doug@safeport.com Voice: 301-217-9220 Fax: 301-217-9277 From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 4 22:21:58 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BDA687CE for ; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 22:21:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (wonkity.com [67.158.26.137]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5EB9D1668 for ; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 22:21:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from wonkity.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id s04Lr7Jo098169; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 14:53:07 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Received: from localhost (wblock@localhost) by wonkity.com (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) with ESMTP id s04Lr7Yu098166; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 14:53:07 -0700 (MST) (envelope-from wblock@wonkity.com) Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2014 14:53:07 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block To: doug@safeport.com Subject: Re: Xorg support question In-Reply-To: Message-ID: References: User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (wonkity.com [127.0.0.1]); Sat, 04 Jan 2014 14:53:07 -0700 (MST) Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 22:21:58 -0000 On Sat, 4 Jan 2014, doug@safeport.com wrote: > KMS: Is this is an Intel only thing, No. At present on FreeBSD, Intel and ATI/AMD. > implemented in the video card? No, it just means the video card driver is in the kernel. > Intel driver: I assume support has passed the ironlake card by. I confess that the Intel codenames usually mean nothing to me. KMS Intel drivers work on both Core2 and i3/i5 notebooks for me, and just recently KMS Radeon drivers work on 4650 and 4850 desktop cards. > The question here is: Is there a way to take the output of pciconf and > relate it to a vendor card designation? The way I read the man page > for the Intel driver, ironlake should be supported, but it is not. Don't know, but it would be handy. > The last more general question is: Is there a way to avoid Intel graphics and > RealteK wireless since neither seems to be on the 'to be supported' queue. Good news: most Intel graphics are supported, except for the newest Haswell stuff (and the old, old chipset that Intel wants to forget). And more good news, there is a driver for the newer Realtek 8188/8192: rsu(4). But I still prefer to just put in an Atheros card when possible. From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jan 4 22:55:27 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C50925A; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 22:55:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from yoshi.bluerosetech.com (yoshi.bluerosetech.com [IPv6:2607:f2f8:a450::66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 032391886; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 22:55:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from chombo.houseloki.net (c-71-236-222-167.hsd1.wa.comcast.net [71.236.222.167]) by yoshi.bluerosetech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6DA6CE6079; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 14:55:19 -0800 (PST) Received: from [IPv6:2601:7:16c0:b50:ed0b:a3c0:54d2:fc39] (unknown [IPv6:2601:7:16c0:b50:ed0b:a3c0:54d2:fc39]) by chombo.houseloki.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 52D3E43E; Sat, 4 Jan 2014 14:55:04 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <52C89140.5040700@bluerosetech.com> Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 14:54:56 -0800 From: Darren Pilgrim User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-fs , freebsd-questions Subject: zfs upgrade hang upgrading from v3 to v5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2014 22:55:27 -0000 I'm upgrading a system from 8.3 to 9.2 using a fresh install onto a parallel set of filesystems on the ZFS pool. The system is a root on ZFS configuration with GPT-labeled AHCI disks. The zpool upgrade step worked fine. When I did `zfs upgrade -a` it didn't return right away, but this system is a little smaller so I left it to work. An hour later, it's still not done. Ctrl-T shows zfs upgrade is in tx->tx_sync_done_cv and using no CPU. Normally I expect to see "runnable" and using some CPU. I can still work in open SSH sessions, but other zfs commands hang. New SSH logins don't work. Console logins hang between me entering the username and it printing the password prompt. Even though I know there are active processes on the system, there is no disk activity. Networking is still fine--the machine acts as a router, and the LAN behind it hasn't loss internet access. The unbound instance running on it is also responsive, but it never touches the disk when running (it syslogs). Figuring it's livelocked on disk I/O, I try to reboot, but neither Control-Alt-Delete nor the power button do anything. I ended up hard resetting the system. The system rebooted without issue. Zfs upgrade showed a few of the v3 filesystems had been upgraded, but most hadn't. Upgrading filesystems one by one got me most of the way there. By dumb luck I got all the way to the base filesystem without anything hanging. The base filesystem, however, did hang. I read Devin Teske's messages to freebsd-fs from Sept 20, 2013 about the same scenario. Interestingly, the base filesystem on this box is the only one that has mountpoint=none. Later today I'll try setting a mountpoint on it see if the upgrade will succeed then. In the meantime, is this a known issue by now? The only things I could find were the aforementioned emails from Devin, and no one answered him.