From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 8 05:27:17 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CE08D293 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 05:27:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B55671527 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 05:27:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s885RHvx083837 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 05:27:17 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 186841] rc.conf ifconfig syntax for binding ip-ranges broken [regression] Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 05:27:17 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: conf X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: hrs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Discussion X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 05:27:17 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186841 --- Comment #4 from Hiroki Sato --- Sorry, I had missed this PR. I am thinking that making _IPEXPANDMAX be user-configurable in rc.conf is better than removing it completely because the number of resulting addresses can be too large. Do you have any specific reason that we should remove this restriction at all? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 8 07:51:48 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0F11DEDB for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 07:51:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAF5D136E for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 07:51:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s887plL7043516 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 07:51:47 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 186841] rc.conf ifconfig syntax for binding ip-ranges broken [regression] Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 07:51:47 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: conf X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: daniel@blodan.se X-Bugzilla-Status: In Discussion X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 07:51:48 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186841 daniel@blodan.se changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |daniel@blodan.se --- Comment #5 from daniel@blodan.se --- May I ask why having the restriction at all? If one wants to bind a /16, let the dude do so! :D -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 8 07:57:31 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B38D2F54 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 07:57:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74A851479 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 07:57:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nine.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by smtp-int.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDE70730D; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 07:57:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: by nine.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 34C32361; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 09:57:16 +0200 (CEST) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Jilles Tjoelker Subject: Re: rc.conf.d improvement References: <86a97bp27r.fsf@nine.des.no> <20140905195912.GC73176@stack.nl> Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 09:57:15 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20140905195912.GC73176@stack.nl> (Jilles Tjoelker's message of "Fri, 5 Sep 2014 21:59:12 +0200") Message-ID: <861trm7des.fsf@nine.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 07:57:31 -0000 Jilles Tjoelker writes: > Conceptually it is ok, but I have a comment about the implementation > of 2). See r270392 DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 8 15:06:33 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A088BABB for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 15:06:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87D811A9C for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 15:06:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s88F6XRS069157 for ; Mon, 8 Sep 2014 15:06:33 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 186841] rc.conf ifconfig syntax for binding ip-ranges broken [regression] Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 15:06:33 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: conf X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: bdrewery@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: In Discussion X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2014 15:06:33 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186841 --- Comment #6 from Bryan Drewery --- (In reply to Hiroki Sato from comment #4) > Sorry, I had missed this PR. I am thinking that making _IPEXPANDMAX be > user-configurable in rc.conf is better than removing it completely because > the number of resulting addresses can be too large. Do you have any > specific reason that we should remove this restriction at all? My reasoning is that it is a regression over how the _addrs mechanism has always worked. It would make sense to limit the ranges by the size of the CIDR mask, but a blanket limit is not right IMHO. If the user specifies X-N/MASK they expect all IPS between X and N to be added, at least for the size of the mask. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 9 06:40:49 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EB946F1 for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 06:40:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 157908B7 for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 06:40:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s896emJp073784 for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2014 06:40:48 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 186841] rc.conf ifconfig syntax for binding ip-ranges broken [regression] Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 06:40:49 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: conf X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.0-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: hrs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Patch Ready X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: hrs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: bug_status assigned_to attachments.created Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2014 06:40:49 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=186841 Hiroki Sato changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|In Discussion |Patch Ready Assignee|freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org |hrs@FreeBSD.org --- Comment #7 from Hiroki Sato --- Created attachment 147097 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=147097&action=edit A patch to make the limit user-configurable and bump the default value up to 2048. _IPEXPANDMAX was not intended for a hard limit of this functionality, just a safety-belt though I did not add it as a user-configurable knob. The reason why I added it is that a misconfiguration can unexpectedly generate a very very large number of addresses, especially in IPv6 because range specification handling in a shell-script is not so robust. A typo in IPv6 address can generate over 2^64 addresses. So, the moot point is whether this limit is still problematic even when it is user-configurable and an appropriate warning message is displayed. My proposed patch is attached. With this patch, one can increase it arbitrarily in rc.conf. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. From owner-freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Sep 11 20:59:55 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C80CCCB for ; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 20:59:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63BDE376 for ; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 20:59:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id s8BKxtUj061333 for ; Thu, 11 Sep 2014 20:59:55 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 179828] [rc.d] [PATCH] rc.d/syslogd link socket to /dev/log fails in jails Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 20:59:55 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: conf X-Bugzilla-Version: 9.1-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: John.Marshall@riverwillow.com.au X-Bugzilla-Status: In Discussion X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-rc@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: --- X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-rc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion related to /etc/rc.d design and implementation." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2014 20:59:55 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179828 --- Comment #2 from John Marshall --- syslogd startup in a jail always displays the following messages: ln: /dev/log: Operation not permitted Starting syslogd. - This bug report includes a patch and other suggestions to avoid that error - This bug report is now nearly 15 months old Any takers? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.