From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 2 09:05:12 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9D959AF3D9 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 09:05:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A600F102D for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 09:05:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A31169AF3D7; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 09:05:12 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2A7E9AF3D6 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 09:05:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from smtp207.alice.it (smtp207.alice.it [82.57.200.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 698EE102C; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 09:05:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (87.18.43.33) by smtp207.alice.it (8.6.060.28) (authenticated as acanedi@alice.it) id 55BB6653005D1379; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 10:59:14 +0200 Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t728xDgX093510; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 10:59:13 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) To: pgsql@FreeBSD.org, ports@freebsd.org From: Andrea Venturoli Subject: Postgresql 92 XML gone? Message-ID: <55BDDBE1.1090101@netfence.it> Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2015 10:59:13 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2015 09:05:12 -0000 Hello. I've recently updated postgresql92-server and now a script of mine gives: > ERROR: unsupported XML feature > DETAIL: This functionality requires the server to be built with libxml support. > HINT: You need to rebuild PostgreSQL using --with-libxml. I thought I made a mistake, went back in /usr/ports/databases/postgresql92-server and did a "make config": I see no XML option there however... What happened to it? How do I get this support back? bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 2 10:09:15 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 706BA9B0473 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 10:09:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from girgen@pingpong.net) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B9191A4A for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 10:09:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from girgen@pingpong.net) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 5AD6D9B0472; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 10:09:15 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A66B9B0471 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 10:09:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from girgen@pingpong.net) Received: from mail.pingpong.net (mail.pingpong.net [79.136.116.202]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F6B91A49; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 10:09:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from girgen@pingpong.net) Received: from [192.168.1.18] (ppp-2-86-176-185.home.otenet.gr [2.86.176.185]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.pingpong.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 289DBBFB5; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 12:09:06 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Postgresql 92 XML gone? From: Palle Girgensohn X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12H143) In-Reply-To: <55BDDBE1.1090101@netfence.it> Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2015 13:08:58 +0300 Cc: "pgsql@FreeBSD.org" , "ports@freebsd.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <1CC43015-DB2D-4A3F-B148-34ED47E1DD9D@pingpong.net> References: <55BDDBE1.1090101@netfence.it> To: Andrea Venturoli X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2015 10:09:15 -0000 I believe you also need to=20 create extension xml ? > 2 aug 2015 kl. 11:59 skrev Andrea Venturoli : >=20 > Hello. >=20 > I've recently updated postgresql92-server and now a script of mine gives: >> ERROR: unsupported XML feature >> DETAIL: This functionality requires the server to be built with libxml su= pport. >> HINT: You need to rebuild PostgreSQL using --with-libxml. >=20 > I thought I made a mistake, went back in > /usr/ports/databases/postgresql92-server and did a "make config": I see no= XML option there however... >=20 > What happened to it? > How do I get this support back? >=20 > bye & Thanks > av. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 2 10:18:16 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF8CD9B066A for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 10:18:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8B781DA0 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 10:18:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A625E9B0669; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 10:18:16 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4BDD9B0668 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 10:18:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 907971D9F for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 10:18:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t72AIG5L035060 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 10:18:16 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id t72AIGQB035059; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 10:18:16 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201508021018.t72AIGQB035059@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 2 Aug 2015 10:18:16 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2015 10:18:16 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ audio/aubio | 0.4.1 | 0.4.2 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Aug 2 11:35:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC8F19B18B9 for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 11:35:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@heesakkers.info) Received: from server4.ohos.nl (server4.ohos.nl [IPv6:2a00:d880:0:6::c951:214d]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 788051BFF for ; Sun, 2 Aug 2015 11:35:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@heesakkers.info) Received: from [31.201.157.97] (helo=ltoliver2013-l.heesakkers.info) by server4.ohos.nl with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ZLrYX-000DJP-4Y for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 02 Aug 2015 13:35:54 +0200 Message-ID: <1438515346.2428.2.camel@heesakkers.info> Subject: Re: Postgresql 92 XML gone? From: Oliver Heesakkers To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2015 13:35:46 +0200 In-Reply-To: <1CC43015-DB2D-4A3F-B148-34ED47E1DD9D@pingpong.net> References: <55BDDBE1.1090101@netfence.it> <1CC43015-DB2D-4A3F-B148-34ED47E1DD9D@pingpong.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.2.1 (3.16.2.1-1.fc22) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2015 11:35:59 -0000 Palle Girgensohn schreef op zo 02-08-2015 om 13:08 [+0300]: > 2 aug 2015 kl. 11:59 skrev Andrea Venturoli : > > > > Hello. > > > > I've recently updated postgresql92-server and now a script of mine > > gives: > > > ERROR: unsupported XML feature > > > DETAIL: This functionality requires the server to be built with > > > libxml support. > > > HINT: You need to rebuild PostgreSQL using --with-libxml. > > > > I thought I made a mistake, went back in > > /usr/ports/databases/postgresql92-server and did a "make config": I > > see no XML option there however... > > > > What happened to it? > > How do I get this support back? > > > > bye & Thanks > > av. I believe you also need to > > create extension xml > > ? And databases/postgresql92-contrib From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Aug 3 05:34:57 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E2899B1C9F for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 05:34:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@dino.sk) Received: from mailhost.netlabit.sk (mailhost.netlabit.sk [84.245.65.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87FB1976 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 05:34:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@dino.sk) Received: from zeta.dino.sk (fw1.dino.sk [84.245.95.252]) (AUTH: LOGIN milan) by mailhost.netlabit.sk with ESMTPA; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 07:29:44 +0200 id 00F3A8FA.55BEFC48.00013ABB Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 07:29:44 +0200 From: Milan Obuch To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: What's going on with svn server? Message-ID: <20150803072944.7935019f@zeta.dino.sk> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.27; i386-portbld-freebsd10.1) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 05:34:57 -0000 Hi, there is something unexpected with svn.freebsd.org: # svnlite update /usr/ports Updating '/usr/ports': svn: E210005: Unable to connect to a repository at URL 'svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head' svn: E210005: No repository found in 'svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head' DNS seems to be working, svn.freebsd.org resolves to CNAME svnmir.geo.freebsd.org. which resolves to A 213.138.116.72, so something happened on server side, probably. Or did I missed something? It worked for me just as expected yesterday... Regards, Milan From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Aug 3 05:36:52 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20B189B1CF2 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 05:36:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4175A38 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 05:36:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ZM8Qb-000957-6h; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 07:36:49 +0200 Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 07:36:49 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Milan Obuch Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What's going on with svn server? Message-ID: <20150803053649.GB6797@home.opsec.eu> References: <20150803072944.7935019f@zeta.dino.sk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150803072944.7935019f@zeta.dino.sk> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 05:36:52 -0000 Hi! > there is something unexpected with svn.freebsd.org: > > # svnlite update /usr/ports > Updating '/usr/ports': > svn: E210005: Unable to connect to a repository at URL 'svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head' > svn: E210005: No repository found in 'svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head' Same problem here. Access still works from repo.freebsd.org, but only via svn+ssh. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Aug 3 07:07:08 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 964AF9B216F for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 07:07:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5367618FA for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 07:07:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ZM9py-0009C9-Tf; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 09:07:06 +0200 Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 09:07:06 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Milan Obuch , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What's going on with svn server? Message-ID: <20150803070706.GC6797@home.opsec.eu> References: <20150803072944.7935019f@zeta.dino.sk> <20150803053649.GB6797@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150803053649.GB6797@home.opsec.eu> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 07:07:08 -0000 Hi! > > svn: E210005: Unable to connect to a repository at URL 'svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head' > > svn: E210005: No repository found in 'svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head' > > Same problem here. > > Access still works from repo.freebsd.org, but only via svn+ssh. Peter Wemm fixed it. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Aug 3 07:19:54 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DB5E9B2485 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 07:19:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@dino.sk) Received: from mailhost.netlabit.sk (mailhost.netlabit.sk [84.245.65.72]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AD551E67 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 07:19:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@dino.sk) Received: from zeta.dino.sk (fw1.dino.sk [84.245.95.252]) (AUTH: LOGIN milan) by mailhost.netlabit.sk with ESMTPA; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 09:19:50 +0200 id 00F3A916.55BF1616.000159C8 Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 09:19:49 +0200 From: Milan Obuch To: Kurt Jaeger Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What's going on with svn server? Message-ID: <20150803091949.5ffb8f4c@zeta.dino.sk> In-Reply-To: <20150803070706.GC6797@home.opsec.eu> References: <20150803072944.7935019f@zeta.dino.sk> <20150803053649.GB6797@home.opsec.eu> <20150803070706.GC6797@home.opsec.eu> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.27; i386-portbld-freebsd10.1) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 07:19:54 -0000 On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 09:07:06 +0200 Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > > svn: E210005: Unable to connect to a repository at URL > > > 'svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head' svn: E210005: No repository > > > found in 'svn://svn.freebsd.org/ports/head' > > > > Same problem here. > > > > Access still works from repo.freebsd.org, but only via svn+ssh. > > Peter Wemm fixed it. > Confirmed. I just found it works again. Thanks. Milan From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Aug 3 20:04:21 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E497E9B23F8 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 20:04:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-x230.google.com (mail-ob0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ADDA7AF for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 20:04:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by obnw1 with SMTP id w1so107122699obn.3 for ; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 13:04:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ejrDhZmzyV7S2fOqsrRwhUUGLZOz/vf6iZsoJfkphYQ=; b=j5tM0Ip0SXxZ+lTY9DwwQhgabPnSejSJHePcdcAH6xG1b7CshRW4c1DDVW9gKu+xYd 9PLi9L3UJseTFUMid2qFUorUv4Ve7QAfrwzrxzkRtGNgPzlQvSaoW2e1otx9EkA+zZOY FeMa47Ap1D0wloU+jLEOy/Pn+jyZDyNToujKi82YY90sQZ7rrSly1clR7HRK2egV0/a1 HsPYs0bsIWNfGQ1mWloRX8UP7xy10s1Dq06gcqA77nZKlPCTi8iUZm5DxDs/hkbdObJB 4hsdGbFzE/S9WgUzpBvFIe8rJUFj3SDwYb66gL/LaOiiAjRMdhiZ7agZRYL4hXDpMvUg Bm0Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.112.228 with SMTP id it4mr2040957obb.25.1438632260001; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 13:04:20 -0700 (PDT) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.202.221.69 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 13:04:19 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 13:04:19 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: jC6Ij8sKzFT4HPAcBbDIv9OIOIo Message-ID: Subject: Problems with update to print/tex-luatex From: Kevin Oberman To: Koop Mast , FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 20:04:21 -0000 When I tried updating print/tex-luatex today, the install phase failed with a number of missing files. The log showed that the port uses luatex in the install phase but fails due to a missing .so, poppler.so.49. This has been superseded by libpoppler.so.53, but the install was defaulting to the previously built binary, not the newly built one. I was able to get the port installed by deleting the existing port (pkg delete tex-luatex) and deleting work/.stage_done.luatex._usr_local and re-running stage and install. I think a note to that effect should be in UPDATING. Obviously this does impact new installs or poudriere build and probably not package installs, but it does hit upgrades. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Aug 3 20:26:40 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C21539B2A03 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 20:26:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpm@fbsd.es) Received: from imap10-3.ox.privateemail.com (imap10-3.ox.privateemail.com [192.64.116.216]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "privateemail.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9635114DF for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 20:26:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpm@fbsd.es) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C7FF2400D4 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 16:26:33 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at imap10.ox.privateemail.com Received: from mail.privateemail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (imap10.ox.privateemail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id z0jv2F7Ol2Q4 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 16:26:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from daemonlab (106.Red-79-155-184.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [79.155.184.106]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D13F12400D3 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 16:26:32 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1438633579.6572.13.camel@fbsd.es> Subject: lang/tcc unusable From: Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina To: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 22:26:19 +0200 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-/Y5SDq8oPh8i9HtOi4nH" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.4 (3.16.4-2.fc22) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 20:26:40 -0000 --=-/Y5SDq8oPh8i9HtOi4nH Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi people, Recently I added amd64 support to TinyCC, but I encounter the following problem trying to compile a simple code. #include int main(){ printf("hello, world!\n); return 0; } % tcc -o hello hello.c In file included from hello.c:1: /usr/include/stdio.h:63: error: ';' expected (got "va_list") I guess that some change introduced in 'stdio.h' causes this weird behaviour. Last time that TCC worked fine was on FreeBSD 9.1 -RELEASE/i386.=20 Also I reported this problem in the tinycc-devel mailing list [1] Any thoughts? [1]=20 https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/tinycc-devel/2015-07/msg00020.html --=20 Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina PGP fingerprint =3D C60E 9497 5302 793B CC2D BB89 A1F3 5D66 E6D0 5453 --=-/Y5SDq8oPh8i9HtOi4nH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAABCAAGBQJVv85rAAoJEKHzXWbm0FRTRbsH/0j7NmzV/Bp/Vcl+PbyVbF99 NlSzSYNo2FpkMoSyGv0BY1vByjFmyeXiO3MVfVSur0N5xG5dzeR6sFxT8U5tIzUO 5X6lYFa9z0kasTm+dooBNlfUJgnQyV8Mv/7LvvD3BlagMAKkmdNEgp2mpXKyJXIO tStMYAXvchPX+p6wG9xLRzfso3iJf1UrymPLnTKQrBqcSJq3zowiC/xbnODxgvTJ UC9xPSaB+YtKDl1uZlTTw0XaMB20BlOLEPmNK6KbBTZhde7NbIf4Uv3PJZNKWMDS HbAQ7ZJhPbvq1tsy3CKXg5nxZPkkwuf2lJoOLLe6IZqS1n65mR5lumNYJa/sMaI= =JZLD -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-/Y5SDq8oPh8i9HtOi4nH-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Aug 3 20:33:56 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C452B9B2CF5 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 20:33:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx2.freebsd.org", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AEDC11C11 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 20:33:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from hammer.pct.niksun.com (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F957484C; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 20:33:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: lang/tcc unusable To: Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" References: <1438633579.6572.13.camel@fbsd.es> From: Jung-uk Kim Message-ID: <55BFD033.8070507@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 16:33:55 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1438633579.6572.13.camel@fbsd.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 20:33:56 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 08/03/2015 16:26, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: > Hi people, > > Recently I added amd64 support to TinyCC, but I encounter the > following problem trying to compile a simple code. > > #include > > int main(){ printf("hello, world!\n); return 0; } > > % tcc -o hello hello.c In file included from hello.c:1: > /usr/include/stdio.h:63: error: ';' expected (got "va_list") > > I guess that some change introduced in 'stdio.h' causes this weird > behaviour. Last time that TCC worked fine was on FreeBSD 9.1 > -RELEASE/i386. > > Also I reported this problem in the tinycc-devel mailing list [1] > > Any thoughts? I haven't tried tcc but '"' is missing for the printf(). Jung-uk Kim -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVv9AuAAoJEHyflib82/FGcssH/RJOU1MJFGfiV4EzWeSm9rNy XzqwOQUH3SjcMVf/13JeBOPTYvrpvGra/V6LkazptufyJXWxlIIZ2bLiTwJx+ruw wDJyzjyXOdvWM202Xz0RvBZiduawQgs4nTBuqPM+7XX1p59njkm0mTQ1nVxQtjcf 4A2h6zSO/65rlkWFkdY+a6QO9J03joV6nwBkD7UIUeoJL4RdiRSaAn6oa6pjB71S XCS69y9mSoXVE9rWd/nELhy46VCkMrx30l01Dbh61FWJNSKJDilkmeJdp1JvX4Nq tXPJyGb235jdXzo/dXk2xjPjlRDPvw+dBWG8jNUB/Zh/oYR4StUxpOj8wrvvpZo= =JZI6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Aug 3 20:41:21 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10A069B2ECE for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 20:41:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpm@fbsd.es) Received: from imap10-3.ox.privateemail.com (imap10-3.ox.privateemail.com [192.64.116.216]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "privateemail.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD0571F1D; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 20:41:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpm@fbsd.es) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0824C2400C7; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 16:41:19 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at imap10.ox.privateemail.com Received: from mail.privateemail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (imap10.ox.privateemail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id QZzxAyr1zgxX; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 16:41:18 -0400 (EDT) Received: from daemonlab (106.Red-79-155-184.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [79.155.184.106]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 126CF2400C2; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 16:41:17 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1438634467.7343.2.camel@fbsd.es> Subject: Re: lang/tcc unusable From: Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina To: Jung-uk Kim , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 22:41:07 +0200 In-Reply-To: <55BFD033.8070507@FreeBSD.org> References: <1438633579.6572.13.camel@fbsd.es> <55BFD033.8070507@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-7vjy125dwYg7xPlU7Aa+" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.4 (3.16.4-2.fc22) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 20:41:21 -0000 --=-7vjy125dwYg7xPlU7Aa+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 16:33 -0400, Jung-uk Kim escribi=C3=B3: Hi Jung-uk, > On 08/03/2015 16:26, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: > > Hi people, > >=20 > > Recently I added amd64 support to TinyCC, but I encounter the > > following problem trying to compile a simple code. > >=20 > > #include > >=20 > > int main(){ printf("hello, world!\n); return 0; } > >=20 > > % tcc -o hello hello.c In file included from hello.c:1:=20 > > /usr/include/stdio.h:63: error: ';' expected (got "va_list") > >=20 > > I guess that some change introduced in 'stdio.h' causes this weird=20 > > behaviour. Last time that TCC worked fine was on FreeBSD 9.1=20 > > -RELEASE/i386. > >=20 > > Also I reported this problem in the tinycc-devel mailing list [1] > >=20 > > Any thoughts? >=20 > I haven't tried tcc but '"' is missing for the printf(). Yes, it was a typo here :) > Jung-uk Kim --=20 Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina PGP fingerprint =3D C60E 9497 5302 793B CC2D BB89 A1F3 5D66 E6D0 5453 --=-7vjy125dwYg7xPlU7Aa+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAABCAAGBQJVv9HjAAoJEKHzXWbm0FRT+ccH/2P6awJpIFZ/mvFVcQCP1pSt oc4YNRHgFemlKUHj8eDXoxynvBEx6lIpQJMWcJJr1gOwjmKkdVgeDajfwO0gA9Y3 Epup3OQk+JjEnet1m82O/UYWUwJBWVErIWYUTl5SlkfEhz3y51QoLnwgVvvz5L3S EEU3fm5pipsK6s19bpgUHC29C+lV9vOhOBNinfBVyPvrHV/ev5MX6iIJytiI4qUi MpKaR2xQRQUaxWBs0ozfyV81cRLXal0jQ9BP/Xc73AnOdzx5+hbPPz6rbNzq+eSI 4gMbj34dN7kEhQRSQHQPsLjs91bhiGe7+PrKkUIz/dbSHlzWVl0ZAIYYkCq6beI= =CeVX -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-7vjy125dwYg7xPlU7Aa+-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Aug 3 21:03:55 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04B679B2431 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 21:03:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pvoigt@uos.de) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.131]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.kundenserver.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 870CCF6B for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 21:03:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pvoigt@uos.de) Received: from spock.drpetervoigt.private ([84.155.91.68]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lghpm-1YYC9v09R8-00oIwL; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 23:03:45 +0200 Received: from kirk.drpetervoigt.private (kirk.drpetervoigt.private [192.168.1.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pvoigt) by spock.drpetervoigt.private (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 435224A03320; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 23:03:44 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 23:03:30 +0200 From: "Dr. Peter Voigt" To: Kevin Oberman Cc: Koop Mast , FreeBSD Ports ML Subject: Re: Problems with update to print/tex-luatex Message-ID: <20150803230330.1769f862@kirk.drpetervoigt.private> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: =?UTF-8?B?VW5pdmVyc2l0w6R0IE9zbmFicsO8Y2s=?= X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:uRvGbxbzkEq+Zkgq7NhTbtn7tHp1KyQltIn/v+K9O+8BUryNmet yc3TYosRaqe5LV/i0p4Yd1oY93INm3j97P962ins/KEpnSlaEXAbDwgeV7mlJLRHAJaPJu/ vYpBUjzikwdjtX0h1dTV4SOfxaRH6PLhl59D3Rr4ugMwjm7b43BvjoTb47W8V9A+/UrrXbW Uw6hT+j9iKkL4JIq8ysSQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:Nu9pCbuR8Ag=:zAvZLpmLTE+2Zo26p2FJqt DntV7CKgXMcMwJTiy32aE6z9vEOSl4a5UU+40hPpamQ/RDurcifg1OLniBklQ9uOUdCLWEq+0 vlB9iEsX5zj2N2mGooMeFPzjLJMh12Eb2mu1S+vALM2D5stSVRyjPJENQJcF2+NsTzJEeZnNj y3bmKRMblyDjVBdkaK3M4Fy6Met3AM6t8FouIQIDGPECbBd4qElcGaOEDpqyMFmwKdTyrNzwf AdeVBUJilNWKjkphuUYzYkEWxEubb8Y3AhufBmjw9tqMC/4g50LNzS120K6OBw0ZCIu8xBy6X 46beg0yBSHro6s5GIipuXnISMG4xaq0JqJetTlajexI5FGX8+QYkThlDLNVm+AtZjpLnY/+iJ qdWpcORMFVm4/aRoQOBfUpKrNmt396HF7ok1EZMDgThvXr0olz5rGkCvIPjeFaKCgNbMiFn6u J4Xoi7dMc2B6aHk8aGw2Oi2X8C5rqFkG/fF0o3nOKIU6vYDN+kx3unEmSBQNZkc/1SRsZtjJ8 bXrZD3rrW0o2IpK7uXufinQxqqBysh5humKlz6kaPU3HsvhcCjSw6KwwScjl0G6FDIgbxHJ0l JZDxBNuBIQNtTPP9VZfqcJTxUNygYqqXl+KxmLuFhQL79+RQd3NVl3vfS8KuOmGh4sZohNomH LYfWVbYvKGmmdU1MJsZ7n/CXrANVoNYHez4tCZvnq0AOmZw== X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 21:03:55 -0000 On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 13:04:19 -0700 Kevin Oberman wrote: > When I tried updating print/tex-luatex today, the install phase > failed with a number of missing files. The log showed that the port > uses luatex in the install phase but fails due to a missing .so, > poppler.so.49. This has been superseded by libpoppler.so.53, but the > install was defaulting to the previously built binary, not the newly > built one. > > I was able to get the port installed by deleting the existing port > (pkg delete tex-luatex) and > deleting work/.stage_done.luatex._usr_local and re-running stage and > install. > > I think a note to that effect should be in UPDATING. Obviously this > does impact new installs or poudriere build and probably not package > installs, but it does hit upgrades. > Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired > E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com > PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" Well, I can confirm this behavior from my today experiences with print/tex-luatex. As a result of my upgrade attempt my old print/tex-luatex packages was deleted. I just upgraded all remaining TeXLive packages and tried a fresh installation of print/tex-luatex: This time it installed just fine. I am far from understanding these miracles but I have learned my ports lesson: Some package refuse to upgrade while being installed - the error messages, however are quite different. Peter From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Aug 3 21:26:57 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9824E9B2AE5 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 21:26:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [8.8.178.116]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx2.freebsd.org", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88B991DA for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 21:26:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from hammer.pct.niksun.com (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32B061AEA; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 21:26:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: lang/tcc unusable To: Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" References: <1438633579.6572.13.camel@fbsd.es> <55BFD033.8070507@FreeBSD.org> <1438634467.7343.2.camel@fbsd.es> From: Jung-uk Kim Message-ID: <55BFDCA0.8040006@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 17:26:56 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1438634467.7343.2.camel@fbsd.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 21:26:57 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 08/03/2015 16:41, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: > El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 16:33 -0400, Jung-uk Kim escribió: > > Hi Jung-uk, >> On 08/03/2015 16:26, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: >>> Hi people, >>> >>> Recently I added amd64 support to TinyCC, but I encounter the >>> following problem trying to compile a simple code. >>> >>> #include >>> >>> int main(){ printf("hello, world!\n); return 0; } >>> >>> % tcc -o hello hello.c In file included from hello.c:1: >>> /usr/include/stdio.h:63: error: ';' expected (got "va_list") >>> >>> I guess that some change introduced in 'stdio.h' causes this >>> weird behaviour. Last time that TCC worked fine was on FreeBSD >>> 9.1 -RELEASE/i386. >>> >>> Also I reported this problem in the tinycc-devel mailing list >>> [1] >>> >>> Any thoughts? >> >> I haven't tried tcc but '"' is missing for the printf(). > > Yes, it was a typo here :) It seems it's a known tcc bug: http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?30966 Jung-uk Kim -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVv9yaAAoJEHyflib82/FGyo0IAJsHtcVWos+Ahd/dgq4O+KXM OUy5yStNq90ryn2MevVXTlT6Jdp83G1tCa5lWOIr7NGyXKAT9IVpEvcYS2ePgMTU 6ZoE2eX3ZhM1NQCxeSDE0empIaIGwTdlKa89FC+vBjxM+OzqdcLhkgC1KEuXUHUX DwwgWf/0EHZVY8jwPN7K0I7GUwO613dVQo+eNq6JG8h1Fyjr9P272wEI2LLpGPan ywnRuEtIPMqitqY3UkStAcj5PPR+53jKgQWD2NdvALIcmF6juiHnTCkgrITCZcNc c8Cx228MGISbI8NoYrggY2y+2QUwvyMklBopl6Q3q/MKJgWPuSACSQ2gAu/rgaI= =8p00 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Aug 3 21:40:40 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D978C9B2D8A for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 21:40:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpm@fbsd.es) Received: from imap11-3.ox.privateemail.com (imap11-3.ox.privateemail.com [198.187.29.245]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "privateemail.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B041C9DA; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 21:40:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpm@fbsd.es) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by imap11.ox.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 636958800D2; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 17:40:33 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at imap11.ox.privateemail.com Received: from imap11.ox.privateemail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (imap11.ox.privateemail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id UUdtbtauIF9j; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 17:40:33 -0400 (EDT) Received: from daemonlab (106.Red-79-155-184.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [79.155.184.106]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by imap11.ox.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 90BDB8800DB; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 17:40:31 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1438638022.7343.7.camel@fbsd.es> Subject: Re: lang/tcc unusable From: Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina To: Jung-uk Kim , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 23:40:22 +0200 In-Reply-To: <55BFDCA0.8040006@FreeBSD.org> References: <1438633579.6572.13.camel@fbsd.es> <55BFD033.8070507@FreeBSD.org> <1438634467.7343.2.camel@fbsd.es> <55BFDCA0.8040006@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-XkMLhWF05pAsg2ZlI7KO" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.4 (3.16.4-2.fc22) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 21:40:40 -0000 --=-XkMLhWF05pAsg2ZlI7KO Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 17:26 -0400, Jung-uk Kim escribi=C3=B3: > On 08/03/2015 16:41, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: > > El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 16:33 -0400, Jung-uk Kim escribi=C3=B3: > >=20 > > Hi Jung-uk, > > > On 08/03/2015 16:26, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: > > > > Hi people, > > > >=20 > > > > Recently I added amd64 support to TinyCC, but I encounter the=20 > > > > following problem trying to compile a simple code. > > > >=20 > > > > #include > > > >=20 > > > > int main(){ printf("hello, world!\n); return 0; } > > > >=20 > > > > % tcc -o hello hello.c In file included from hello.c:1:=20 > > > > /usr/include/stdio.h:63: error: ';' expected (got "va_list") > > > >=20 > > > > I guess that some change introduced in 'stdio.h' causes this > > > > weird behaviour. Last time that TCC worked fine was on FreeBSD > > > > 9.1 -RELEASE/i386. > > > >=20 > > > > Also I reported this problem in the tinycc-devel mailing list > > > > [1] > > > >=20 > > > > Any thoughts? > > >=20 > > > I haven't tried tcc but '"' is missing for the printf(). > >=20 > > Yes, it was a typo here :) >=20 > It seems it's a known tcc bug: >=20 > http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?30966 >=20 Is there something that we can do about it? Thanks for pointing me, jkim@ -- Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina PGP fingerprint =3D C60E 9497 5302 793B CC2D BB89 A1F3 5D66 E6D0 5453 --=-XkMLhWF05pAsg2ZlI7KO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAABCAAGBQJVv9/GAAoJEKHzXWbm0FRT3RAH/AmVbay2rTajSipbfcO1TDrl B9X86w1NRPIe5w21Mlap8TJgb51qH5bArsSjWEs1q0F9BUebY2YL5/ODwYAj4aOt w6bI3Yi8vA5vHr89P0WPJiTjiP0proEnT8LeW7bXgYV61TtMGJodveRYGW3uhq2R +/fYLI6OmSI4UplTCG/1X18SgX3nBz0t0owNo597fJwN/gjKxJhq5/vuoKG//x9d 4ee9Wg/Wcp0BAZKE95Gi7eoOqS2MBylA5BSNr51v/zgTLzU7roHKo/Uze66uXPgo wCT+eMoPYrdwhWVreSNP6zGK0HFj4Im6Ha5mdTbEPUGb5OwKwGuz3phFJKq1UK8= =rHOW -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-XkMLhWF05pAsg2ZlI7KO-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Aug 3 22:25:50 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CCEDB9B2894 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 22:25:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brian@brianwhalen.net) Received: from mail-lb0-f175.google.com (mail-lb0-f175.google.com [209.85.217.175]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 464B61E3 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 22:25:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brian@brianwhalen.net) Received: by lbqc9 with SMTP id c9so59989923lbq.1 for ; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 15:25:41 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=AInEPfmPimhVAxdHtNvqQuR7Pcaf4uhTys/W+XwjdgU=; b=IBs0lCxOgfvoTsPlqheLaLMFLNvW4rGgWYUUsb1vbD+aMRVTqB6srHITuuZ8xLAIbD +xRUE8t3+kXVi61poI+gc3HrHylyCmqOiIpQJwOCinFmbRk7MeeHG0pKg6dmZltNpE02 CcGuSsusgBepA8F3goOXH7ygbE5kXZUb6udFnQMEtQJP+JGU0yv/KHX/xXYVcqYYWZRl 0XhGPH3uRhY0yPIwQh3RSkDIY9INEFWjoGaVKi1nppjMtDbI/N+rE4xMToSmMypn+97p 7XT75yreztMxuIUjTOl0hsuuv1B7IlJRgy2J7ONvIyK76a0iibuTz4Wq4uSXq2n4jJox /JsQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkBV+q7jslI8mEoZccIYaydwqGYi6H85fTNTTvWxrmRtW/FnlfhYC7dQfgsy8gTvLgNDZwl MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.20.106 with SMTP id m10mr273276lae.7.1438640372818; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 15:19:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.4.194 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 15:19:32 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [140.239.2.162] In-Reply-To: References: <55AF4D00.7010304@brianwhalen.net> <55BC82F7.4010503@brianwhalen.net> Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 15:19:32 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Fwd: [Imap-uw] inbox corruption by iphone From: "Brian W." To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 22:25:51 -0000 Based on the below it seems the imap-uw port ought to go to an unsupported state or be otherwise modified? Brian ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David B Funk Date: Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 7:59 AM Subject: Re: [Imap-uw] inbox corruption by iphone To: brian Cc: UW imap list Have you tried the "Panda IMAP" distro? https://github.com/jonabbey/panda-imap The mailbox locking problem can be avoided by using an alternate form of mailbox (such as MIX) instead of the traditional mbox. Of course this won't work in an environment that requires local direct access to the mailbox by non-C-client aware mail clients. If you can switch to MIX format there are many advantages (performance, scale-ability, backup facilitation, etc). However if you do switch to MIX be -sure- to run the Panda distro, there were some unfixed bugs in the UW-imap distro that can bite you. After Mark left UW he started his own company with a fork of the UW-imap which he called "Panda" and then started developing a commercial product from there. He kept Panda alive and semi-open sourced, making bug-fixes and adding some small improvements (I know from conversations I had with him in '09 about a UW-imap bug I found/fixed ). He made it available to people who explicitly asked him for it. After his death people took the last known version of Panda and turned it into a github project and made additional improvements to it (I contributed one of them ;). On Sat, 1 Aug 2015, brian wrote: as expected, thanx for confirming. > > Brian > > On 8/1/2015 1:25 AM, Chris Bunch wrote: > >> I have been running a UW_IMAP server on Mac OS X mainly for family >> accounts for around 12 years. We are all Mac/iOS users: we noted early o= n >> that UW_IMAP doesn't cope well with more than one client logged into an >> account at the same time. When the most any of us had was two machines >> (home/office or home/laptop) that was relatively easy to manage but when >> iOS came along(iPhones, iPads) came along things began to unravel and th= e >> situation became unworkable. iPhones never stayed in sync with the serve= r, >> though I have not seen the specific corruption you mention. >> >> I am now in the process of transferring family accounts to Fastmail and >> am setting up Dovecot on Linode/Ubuntu for a few other accounts I manage= . >> Sadly, UW_IPAD=E2=80=99s future died with Mark Crispin. >> >> C >> ________________________ >> >> >> On 22 Jul 2015, at 08:57, brian wrote: >>> >>> One of the users on my freebsd server that runs uw imap has an >>> intermittent problem with inbox corruption. Is a fix planned? I see oth= ers >>> have had this issue already. I am essentially seeing this >>> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D557103 though on >>> Freebsd. >>> >>> >>> Brian >>> >> --=20 Dave Funk University of Iowa College of Engineering 319/335-5751 FAX: 319/384-0549 1256 Seamans Center Sys_admin/Postmaster/cell_admin Iowa City, IA 52242-1527 #include Better is not better, 'standard' is better. B{ From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Aug 3 22:26:51 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FDEA9B2904 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 22:26:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [8.8.178.116]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx2.freebsd.org", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E39828A for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 22:26:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from hammer.pct.niksun.com (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BACF635F9; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 22:26:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: lang/tcc unusable To: Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" References: <1438633579.6572.13.camel@fbsd.es> <55BFD033.8070507@FreeBSD.org> <1438634467.7343.2.camel@fbsd.es> <55BFDCA0.8040006@FreeBSD.org> <1438638022.7343.7.camel@fbsd.es> From: Jung-uk Kim X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <55BFEAAA.4070008@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 18:26:50 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1438638022.7343.7.camel@fbsd.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 22:26:51 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 08/03/2015 17:40, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: > El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 17:26 -0400, Jung-uk Kim escribió: >> On 08/03/2015 16:41, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: >>> El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 16:33 -0400, Jung-uk Kim escribió: >>> >>> Hi Jung-uk, >>>> On 08/03/2015 16:26, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: >>>>> Hi people, >>>>> >>>>> Recently I added amd64 support to TinyCC, but I encounter >>>>> the following problem trying to compile a simple code. >>>>> >>>>> #include >>>>> >>>>> int main(){ printf("hello, world!\n); return 0; } >>>>> >>>>> % tcc -o hello hello.c In file included from hello.c:1: >>>>> /usr/include/stdio.h:63: error: ';' expected (got >>>>> "va_list") >>>>> >>>>> I guess that some change introduced in 'stdio.h' causes >>>>> this weird behaviour. Last time that TCC worked fine was on >>>>> FreeBSD 9.1 -RELEASE/i386. >>>>> >>>>> Also I reported this problem in the tinycc-devel mailing >>>>> list [1] >>>>> >>>>> Any thoughts? >>>> >>>> I haven't tried tcc but '"' is missing for the printf(). >>> >>> Yes, it was a typo here :) >> >> It seems it's a known tcc bug: >> >> http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?30966 >> > > Is there something that we can do about it? > > Thanks for pointing me, jkim@ It seems there is no easy way to fix this problem without touching src tree, e.g., - --- sys/x86/include/_types.h (revision 286256) +++ sys/x86/include/_types.h (working copy) @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ */ #ifdef __GNUCLIKE_BUILTIN_VARARGS typedef __builtin_va_list __va_list; /* internally known to gcc */ - -#elif defined(lint) +#elif defined(__TINYC__) || defined(lint) typedef char * __va_list; /* pretend */ #endif #if defined(__GNUC_VA_LIST_COMPATIBILITY) && !defined(__GNUC_VA_LIST) \ Jung-uk Kim -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVv+qlAAoJEHyflib82/FGJ0YH/jX8EZnWenTM2BJEjLNrIA8O XjYIPgFWkL/DZF8GnTZYv0mcrP9UgxNix2U76PDTBN8n/xkBCIUJpUORysQqTlo5 olU4nVT5EMfVyO2YDKEsb5c+dDsWkE0MPt/t2HE+oPDmml75v3MnCZAQmgIp8VsO Peb8bhbJ913xECFcW4XhVqKMy+uCsX6tPW/2Epw+p/Ho8Id3RM4A7CBprVhkNkAp zAPe2/PxAH71m2HzCKq6tMVe4DZKyi708pry0ApbYXYa2+JIA2YXKCBX4ugYJgI0 K860//U30Zn4DeZ/VGxENa9xo+c56g0NcWvjO6qvTOSU1h2ItBVrsvQPBfmLTIQ= =zBRK -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Aug 3 23:30:16 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 589E89B2A54 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 23:30:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpm@fbsd.es) Received: from relay1.ox.registrar-servers.com (relay1.ox.registrar-servers.com [199.188.203.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.registrar-servers.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A84AE27; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 23:30:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpm@fbsd.es) Received: from imap1-1.ox.privateemail.com (imap1-1.ox.privateemail.com [198.187.29.239]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by relay.ox.registrar-servers.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 629DEB011B; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 19:24:10 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by imap1.ox.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEDEAB00091; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 19:24:02 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at imap1.ox.privateemail.com Received: from imap1.ox.privateemail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (imap1.ox.privateemail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id k7nmbApsSDEV; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 19:24:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from daemonlab (106.Red-79-155-184.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [79.155.184.106]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.ox.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0DD43B00098; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 19:24:01 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1438644237.7343.13.camel@fbsd.es> Subject: Re: lang/tcc unusable From: Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina To: Jung-uk Kim , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 01:23:57 +0200 In-Reply-To: <55BFEAAA.4070008@FreeBSD.org> References: <1438633579.6572.13.camel@fbsd.es> <55BFD033.8070507@FreeBSD.org> <1438634467.7343.2.camel@fbsd.es> <55BFDCA0.8040006@FreeBSD.org> <1438638022.7343.7.camel@fbsd.es> <55BFEAAA.4070008@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-uj44wW4OmCha03GDMYWU" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.4 (3.16.4-2.fc22) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 23:30:16 -0000 --=-uj44wW4OmCha03GDMYWU Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 18:26 -0400, Jung-uk Kim escribi=C3=B3: > On 08/03/2015 17:40, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: > > El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 17:26 -0400, Jung-uk Kim escribi=C3=B3: > > > On 08/03/2015 16:41, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: > > > > El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 16:33 -0400, Jung-uk Kim escribi=C3=B3: > > > >=20 > > > > Hi Jung-uk, > > > > > On 08/03/2015 16:26, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: > > > > > > Hi people, > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > Recently I added amd64 support to TinyCC, but I encounter > > > > > > the following problem trying to compile a simple code. > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > #include > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > int main(){ printf("hello, world!\n); return 0; } > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > % tcc -o hello hello.c In file included from hello.c:1:=20 > > > > > > /usr/include/stdio.h:63: error: ';' expected (got > > > > > > "va_list") > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > I guess that some change introduced in 'stdio.h' causes > > > > > > this weird behaviour. Last time that TCC worked fine was on > > > > > > FreeBSD 9.1 -RELEASE/i386. > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > Also I reported this problem in the tinycc-devel mailing > > > > > > list [1] > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > >=20 > > > > > I haven't tried tcc but '"' is missing for the printf(). > > > >=20 > > > > Yes, it was a typo here :) > > >=20 > > > It seems it's a known tcc bug: > > >=20 > > > http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?30966 > > >=20 > >=20 > > Is there something that we can do about it? > >=20 > > Thanks for pointing me, jkim@ >=20 > It seems there is no easy way to fix this problem without touching=20 > src > tree, e.g., >=20 > --- sys/x86/include/_types.h (revision 286256) > +++ sys/x86/include/_types.h (working copy) > @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ > */ > #ifdef __GNUCLIKE_BUILTIN_VARARGS > typedef __builtin_va_list __va_list; /*=20 > internally known to gcc */ > -#elif defined(lint) > +#elif defined(__TINYC__) || defined(lint) > typedef char * __va_list; /*=20 > pretend */ > #endif > #if defined(__GNUC_VA_LIST_COMPATIBILITY) &&=20 > !defined(__GNUC_VA_LIST) \ >=20 If you need doing some changes into the src tree. So, what do you recommend in such case?=20 Would it be much trouble add the necessary changes to run TCC again? Furthermore, TinyCC developer has ignored this issue completely. Cheers, -- Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina PGP fingerprint =3D C60E 9497 5302 793B CC2D BB89 A1F3 5D66 E6D0 5453 --=-uj44wW4OmCha03GDMYWU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAABCAAGBQJVv/gOAAoJEKHzXWbm0FRTzNQH/1yuKLlyuPg/WqO91+XOh+Qg uwDVHDiDljlp7jcs53wwJnDnzUpR3xKAWrTDvzss8q/dKFLhWzy4YwUbU1DnDlxH R4tQqpHyd3TcfSoE3L2ioWdzSPpgFo03xxjllkYJ3/BlCtF3q1+AuSbtQnQRm2ut ARDh9AzRvSCEGW6Ydk6ULXt0SCDwgVhOtkJ3ia+h1N4JkU/EbvAKkprbfw24KRp4 EM5aXkVmTBoVSTwr0CWcUdVebir7wYivYZC6Wi6w7g+kfy6EXydgDedGAhLwCJSW fqtlcPxn9RlzC5BS0QT8/E4f38ONDY9wzfwG/3BqROAiOYpkKasFhMTTG7/mnk8= =OC4d -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-uj44wW4OmCha03GDMYWU-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 4 00:15:47 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7406D9B2A4D for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 00:15:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi0-x235.google.com (mail-oi0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AB82C09 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 00:15:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by oihn130 with SMTP id n130so11175004oih.2 for ; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:15:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=5vD5uVmnPck3+dVNGAd2jKbPoZUYgBAswUm7DnOWLJ0=; b=j6K5sk99U0OsaisN/brlWTvpM7hw4VFxV0KYbt1M2AaEMVKzrLrh03fww1zruwoPeo obxuEYGNqVTR/Fs7mSAl98eaqOCZvr79WDvYKOMpqrwO3ltVzCi6IdYlqomXt/emmIWZ +Wg0l0Q2a56xkrSNTUsWJL3Nb10Vzf5DDacgKicZ/bL5wjisMEnWlakM8sSsuR9P8eiO XvgC3Igdf3Py8hEKxhZGaoCHP5nMrmOlkQ1NMoFOpllErwK/E4yyRSKGilJFYaitg8j7 v/PgdzjiPAygemU263MZEtWNNaU1uLkJPY3+QXTM4NtylThEDh2o77IVyypvj8T6Bg9v +UqQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.87.22 with SMTP id l22mr572798oib.91.1438647346510; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:15:46 -0700 (PDT) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.202.221.69 with HTTP; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 17:15:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150803230330.1769f862@kirk.drpetervoigt.private> References: <20150803230330.1769f862@kirk.drpetervoigt.private> Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 17:15:46 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 1zpjMXGu6UDwKRP-RYwmu9W4fFU Message-ID: Subject: Re: Problems with update to print/tex-luatex From: Kevin Oberman To: "Dr. Peter Voigt" Cc: Koop Mast , FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 00:15:47 -0000 On Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Dr. Peter Voigt wrote: > On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 13:04:19 -0700 > Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > When I tried updating print/tex-luatex today, the install phase > > failed with a number of missing files. The log showed that the port > > uses luatex in the install phase but fails due to a missing .so, > > poppler.so.49. This has been superseded by libpoppler.so.53, but the > > install was defaulting to the previously built binary, not the newly > > built one. > > > > I was able to get the port installed by deleting the existing port > > (pkg delete tex-luatex) and > > deleting work/.stage_done.luatex._usr_local and re-running stage and > > install. > > > > I think a note to that effect should be in UPDATING. Obviously this > > does impact new installs or poudriere build and probably not package > > installs, but it does hit upgrades. > > Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired > > E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com > > PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to > > "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > Well, I can confirm this behavior from my today experiences with > print/tex-luatex. As a result of my upgrade attempt my old > print/tex-luatex packages was deleted. > > I just upgraded all remaining TeXLive packages and tried a fresh > installation of print/tex-luatex: This time it installed just fine. > > I am far from understanding these miracles but I have learned my ports > lesson: Some package refuse to upgrade while being installed - the > error messages, however are quite different. > > Peter > This is annoyingly common and seldom caught because the standard test method is a virgin install. It can involve using the wrong header files, the wrong shareable, or the wrong executable. As the errors can be be triggered in a variety of ways, they can look quite different. Usually the log can point out the issue as it did in this case. This was an issue with libchamplain for years, but was finally fixed. -- Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 4 00:22:48 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5407F9B2C67 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 00:22:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [8.8.178.116]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx2.freebsd.org", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 433931057 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 00:22:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from hammer.pct.niksun.com (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E131921B5; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 00:22:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: lang/tcc unusable To: Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" References: <1438633579.6572.13.camel@fbsd.es> <55BFD033.8070507@FreeBSD.org> <1438634467.7343.2.camel@fbsd.es> <55BFDCA0.8040006@FreeBSD.org> <1438638022.7343.7.camel@fbsd.es> <55BFEAAA.4070008@FreeBSD.org> <1438644237.7343.13.camel@fbsd.es> From: Jung-uk Kim X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <55C005D7.3050103@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 20:22:47 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1438644237.7343.13.camel@fbsd.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 00:22:48 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 08/03/2015 19:23, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: > El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 18:26 -0400, Jung-uk Kim escribió: >> On 08/03/2015 17:40, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: >>> El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 17:26 -0400, Jung-uk Kim escribió: >>>> On 08/03/2015 16:41, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: >>>>> El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 16:33 -0400, Jung-uk Kim >>>>> escribió: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Jung-uk, >>>>>> On 08/03/2015 16:26, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: >>>>>>> Hi people, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Recently I added amd64 support to TinyCC, but I >>>>>>> encounter the following problem trying to compile a >>>>>>> simple code. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> #include >>>>>>> >>>>>>> int main(){ printf("hello, world!\n); return 0; } >>>>>>> >>>>>>> % tcc -o hello hello.c In file included from >>>>>>> hello.c:1: /usr/include/stdio.h:63: error: ';' expected >>>>>>> (got "va_list") >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I guess that some change introduced in 'stdio.h' causes >>>>>>> this weird behaviour. Last time that TCC worked fine >>>>>>> was on FreeBSD 9.1 -RELEASE/i386. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Also I reported this problem in the tinycc-devel >>>>>>> mailing list [1] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Any thoughts? >>>>>> >>>>>> I haven't tried tcc but '"' is missing for the printf(). >>>>> >>>>> Yes, it was a typo here :) >>>> >>>> It seems it's a known tcc bug: >>>> >>>> http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?30966 >>>> >>> >>> Is there something that we can do about it? >>> >>> Thanks for pointing me, jkim@ >> >> It seems there is no easy way to fix this problem without >> touching src tree, e.g., >> >> --- sys/x86/include/_types.h (revision 286256) +++ >> sys/x86/include/_types.h (working copy) @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ */ >> #ifdef __GNUCLIKE_BUILTIN_VARARGS typedef __builtin_va_list >> __va_list; /* internally known to gcc */ -#elif defined(lint) >> +#elif defined(__TINYC__) || defined(lint) typedef char * >> __va_list; /* pretend */ #endif #if >> defined(__GNUC_VA_LIST_COMPATIBILITY) && >> !defined(__GNUC_VA_LIST) \ >> > > If you need doing some changes into the src tree. https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/286265 > So, what do you recommend in such case? Would it be much trouble > add the necessary changes to run TCC again? Furthermore, TinyCC > developer has ignored this issue completely. The only hack I see is defining __va_list as a macro from libtcc.c but it is ugly. Jung-uk Kim -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVwAXXAAoJEHyflib82/FGLOwH/3HxMqLqt/G6thF5DqTQsqA+ PoHwp3Qdvkwx9Z/LjjLQlyrtZMSXSBfKv0IisZlblaFqkV0p8rnC/X+hpHhtTm4I 6inQyI36zwCRr3aD31hvRWpeYpjjZSJotsTbvmb4+cvjw4nSyJ43lBcomAyGx9dW 0lDrxVDzUvyVpBqYMGOgp6IvaDpyo2YF8yanpKD1vksdzDi2KvyvkRQx9/3VLu8A OJla4pluo2Q83wQmRZqJZIu5eqgYQCdI/2ETiV4bVWLarQRkdwWHgjwt2LqQEciE ZNIGKhFUBDXhXjuw0ND+UofQrt9IZtmNRRYX6LoaDuTdhazlDQKsq/opCHGYVsI= =bbog -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 4 07:54:15 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 101919B2159 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 07:54:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from girgen@pingpong.net) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDE30DF for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 07:54:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from girgen@pingpong.net) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id EB0DD9B2158; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 07:54:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA90A9B2155 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 07:54:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from girgen@pingpong.net) Received: from mail.pingpong.net (mail.pingpong.net [79.136.116.202]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05717DD; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 07:54:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from girgen@pingpong.net) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (ppp-2-86-213-26.home.otenet.gr [2.86.213.26]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.pingpong.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 82B4EB3FE; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 09:54:05 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Proposal to fix postgresql package maintainance nightmare From: Palle Girgensohn X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12H143) In-Reply-To: <20150721120342.GG21594@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 10:54:03 +0300 Cc: Shane Ambler , "pgsql@FreeBSD.org" , "ports@FreeBSD.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <7239E352-D053-4EB5-8561-66924C031096@pingpong.net> References: <20150721094627.GD21594@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <55AE327F.8040300@ShaneWare.Biz> <20150721120342.GG21594@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> To: Baptiste Daroussin X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 07:54:15 -0000 > 21 jul 2015 kl. 15:03 skrev Baptiste Daroussin : >=20 >> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 09:22:31PM +0930, Shane Ambler wrote: >>> On 21/07/2015 19:16, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>> Hi, >>>=20 >>> We do manage a bunch of postgresql servers on FreeBSD, and I really find= the >>> current model of packages postgresql is a nightmare on FreeBSD. >>>=20 >>> Let's first start with the current issues. >>> - Impossible to have tools from both old and new version at the same tim= e (which >>> is necessary to upgrade db and prepare upgrades of db) >>> - Impossible to chose the version we want to run in production without h= aving to >>> rebuild the packages and the whole ports tree with a specific default.= >>> - Nightmare each time a new default version is set in the ports tree. >>=20 >> Sounds like a good plan, I am not a heavy postgresql user but I have >> set the default pg version in make.conf to prevent unexpected new >> versions going in during port updates when I didn't think of doing >> upgrade steps. >>=20 >>> Here is my proposal to fix that. >>>=20 >>> Having one single postgresql-client package always on the latest stable v= ersion >>> (backward compability being very good) providing the client cli tools an= d the >>> libraries (those libraries will be used for everything in the ports tree= >>> needing to talk to postgresql) >>>=20 >>> Have one full postgresql package per supported version upstream self ins= talling >>> itself into let's say: /usr/local/postgresql94 and symlinks all the clie= nt tools >>> to /usr/local/bin suffixed by the version psql94 pg_bla94 etc. >>=20 >> Don't want to start a debate but thought I would mention as food for=20 >> thought -- >>=20 >> I'm not sure of any strong need to have more than one pg client version >> available. The newer client can connect to any older server and I don't >> know of any issues when an old client connects to a newer server. >=20 > That is why I propose only one client for regular users >>=20 >>> That way everything talk to pgsql will only depend on one postgresql-cli= ent >>> packages that will smoothly be upgraded to newer versions. >>>=20 >>> All database administrators will have the ability to chose the productio= n >>> version they do want without having to worry about a default version. >>>=20 >>> They can install multiple version in parallel and deal with upgrade the w= ay they >>> want having access to both versions of the tools of the same time. >>>=20 >>> Any opinion on that change? Any idea one how to make the upgrade path as= >>> transparent as possible for current setup? (beside of course adding an U= PDATING >>> entry) >>=20 >> I think allowing multiple pg server versions is a good idea, this can >> prevent old binary versions being removed before the data update process.= >>=20 >> A new upgrade command could be added so we can do `service postgresql >> upgrade` which tests for existing paths, defines old and new dirs and >> runs pg_upgrade. >>=20 >> The rc script could either add a version postfix to the data dir path >> or test PG_VERSION content to decide if data gets moved to data-old so >> new versions being started won't see older version data. Lack of up to >> date data dirs can lead to "You need to perform an upgrade first." >> Different disk usage (filecount?) for old and new data dir can lead to >> "Have you upgraded your old data?" >>=20 >> I don't think an upgrade step could be added during a port build, it >> would have to be at server start in the rc script. I wouldn't add an >> automatic upgrade step unless it was enabled by the user. >=20 > 100% agree, at first I would not even propose an automatic upgrade mechani= sm I > find it too dangerous by design I would expect admins to do upgrade themse= lves > preparing it etc. >=20 > By upgrade patch I was more thinking when a user will make pkg upgrade and= get > the new scheme I want everything to be safe and smooth (transparent) from w= hat I > already tested this is the case now, but hey maybe someone has figured out= > something that could be wrong. >=20 > Best regards, > Bapt Hi, Sorry for not joining the conversation earlier. Did anything more happen her= e? I did some test work a few years ago to make it possible to have multiple ve= rsions installed in parallel. My approach then was that of lib/pgsqlNN and s= ymlinks for the default version, similar to how macports do it.=20 Reading the discussion in this thread, one of the main goals would be to eas= e dependency management for ports depending on PostgreSQL. My previous appro= ach would not really remedy that problem.=20 Suggesting just one client install is not perfect either, since psql's inter= nal commands, \[a-zA-Z]+, are somewhat linked to the version on the server. T= hough these commands rarely changes, it happens.=20 What is extremely stable, though, is libpq.so.5. And isn't that what most po= rts depend upon? So the best would perhaps be to separate postgresql-libpq that always uses t= he latest version (?) and have postgresqlNN-(client|server|contrib) like now= , except that the client of course is stripped from libpq? I'm not sure how we would handle alpha- and beta versions, but for productio= n versions it would probably work.=20 Thoughts? Palle= From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 4 09:11:34 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C56C69B360C for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 09:11:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A016D9D4 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 09:11:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 9F24D9B360B; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 09:11:34 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EB3E9B360A for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 09:11:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x22a.google.com (mail-wi0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 44DF59D1; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 09:11:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: by wibxm9 with SMTP id xm9so156731578wib.0; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 02:11:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=/wMHwUFV4FV24a8UWpUsKpNihI4OVH2leftNBCCU88w=; b=FnhRD/kzr9oHLcx4n2mYKtMbpdOFmF3P3Ju7I0lXqfxWvEZurA0jzAMWEsav+TmuyZ uTSAzBlER0/qU5PSw/fXLE5YxRQS/KvogLHcm9259Pyv7a4GzWtE4UWrYb8/rG/kGgSL XXtU+Ux6mdjMRYjowG5HOPeorrzx8xyyQEWa8Ur2HDR2uRPCzu5Fi3wuoy3j8wi2stoT YEMfv0FwIZ2xaXugu/VeqahAr0L9I2VzRnR2uaXK+BnqBVH2etYMrp3ISorMHp6K0yCr 0kPIbT2mAFx7cz33PjjRZCfeVyfh7mCw2MYF1ZHo0EoruToXKQzw2ncvuJpBvptJnfPm OyGg== X-Received: by 10.180.74.115 with SMTP id s19mr41384561wiv.18.1438679492632; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 02:11:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id s1sm1262568wix.13.2015.08.04.02.11.30 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Aug 2015 02:11:31 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 11:11:29 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Palle Girgensohn Cc: Shane Ambler , "pgsql@FreeBSD.org" , "ports@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: Proposal to fix postgresql package maintainance nightmare Message-ID: <20150804091128.GA31243@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20150721094627.GD21594@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <55AE327F.8040300@ShaneWare.Biz> <20150721120342.GG21594@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <7239E352-D053-4EB5-8561-66924C031096@pingpong.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7239E352-D053-4EB5-8561-66924C031096@pingpong.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 09:11:34 -0000 --CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 10:54:03AM +0300, Palle Girgensohn wrote: >=20 >=20 >=20 >=20 > > 21 jul 2015 kl. 15:03 skrev Baptiste Daroussin : > >=20 > >> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 09:22:31PM +0930, Shane Ambler wrote: > >>> On 21/07/2015 19:16, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >>> Hi, > >>>=20 > >>> We do manage a bunch of postgresql servers on FreeBSD, and I really f= ind the > >>> current model of packages postgresql is a nightmare on FreeBSD. > >>>=20 > >>> Let's first start with the current issues. > >>> - Impossible to have tools from both old and new version at the same = time (which > >>> is necessary to upgrade db and prepare upgrades of db) > >>> - Impossible to chose the version we want to run in production withou= t having to > >>> rebuild the packages and the whole ports tree with a specific defau= lt. > >>> - Nightmare each time a new default version is set in the ports tree. > >>=20 > >> Sounds like a good plan, I am not a heavy postgresql user but I have > >> set the default pg version in make.conf to prevent unexpected new > >> versions going in during port updates when I didn't think of doing > >> upgrade steps. > >>=20 > >>> Here is my proposal to fix that. > >>>=20 > >>> Having one single postgresql-client package always on the latest stab= le version > >>> (backward compability being very good) providing the client cli tools= and the > >>> libraries (those libraries will be used for everything in the ports t= ree > >>> needing to talk to postgresql) > >>>=20 > >>> Have one full postgresql package per supported version upstream self = installing > >>> itself into let's say: /usr/local/postgresql94 and symlinks all the c= lient tools > >>> to /usr/local/bin suffixed by the version psql94 pg_bla94 etc. > >>=20 > >> Don't want to start a debate but thought I would mention as food for= =20 > >> thought -- > >>=20 > >> I'm not sure of any strong need to have more than one pg client version > >> available. The newer client can connect to any older server and I don't > >> know of any issues when an old client connects to a newer server. > >=20 > > That is why I propose only one client for regular users > >>=20 > >>> That way everything talk to pgsql will only depend on one postgresql-= client > >>> packages that will smoothly be upgraded to newer versions. > >>>=20 > >>> All database administrators will have the ability to chose the produc= tion > >>> version they do want without having to worry about a default version. > >>>=20 > >>> They can install multiple version in parallel and deal with upgrade t= he way they > >>> want having access to both versions of the tools of the same time. > >>>=20 > >>> Any opinion on that change? Any idea one how to make the upgrade path= as > >>> transparent as possible for current setup? (beside of course adding a= n UPDATING > >>> entry) > >>=20 > >> I think allowing multiple pg server versions is a good idea, this can > >> prevent old binary versions being removed before the data update proce= ss. > >>=20 > >> A new upgrade command could be added so we can do `service postgresql > >> upgrade` which tests for existing paths, defines old and new dirs and > >> runs pg_upgrade. > >>=20 > >> The rc script could either add a version postfix to the data dir path > >> or test PG_VERSION content to decide if data gets moved to data-old so > >> new versions being started won't see older version data. Lack of up to > >> date data dirs can lead to "You need to perform an upgrade first." > >> Different disk usage (filecount?) for old and new data dir can lead to > >> "Have you upgraded your old data?" > >>=20 > >> I don't think an upgrade step could be added during a port build, it > >> would have to be at server start in the rc script. I wouldn't add an > >> automatic upgrade step unless it was enabled by the user. > >=20 > > 100% agree, at first I would not even propose an automatic upgrade mech= anism I > > find it too dangerous by design I would expect admins to do upgrade the= mselves > > preparing it etc. > >=20 > > By upgrade patch I was more thinking when a user will make pkg upgrade = and get > > the new scheme I want everything to be safe and smooth (transparent) fr= om what I > > already tested this is the case now, but hey maybe someone has figured = out > > something that could be wrong. > >=20 > > Best regards, > > Bapt >=20 > Hi, >=20 > Sorry for not joining the conversation earlier. Did anything more happen = here? Don't worry I would not have pushed any big change like this without you reviewing and validating first :) >=20 > I did some test work a few years ago to make it possible to have multiple= versions installed in parallel. My approach then was that of lib/pgsqlNN a= nd symlinks for the default version, similar to how macports do it.=20 >=20 > Reading the discussion in this thread, one of the main goals would be to = ease dependency management for ports depending on PostgreSQL. My previous a= pproach would not really remedy that problem.=20 >=20 > Suggesting just one client install is not perfect either, since psql's in= ternal commands, \[a-zA-Z]+, are somewhat linked to the version on the serv= er. Though these commands rarely changes, it happens.=20 Yup that is what I figured out. >=20 > What is extremely stable, though, is libpq.so.5. And isn't that what most= ports depend upon? >=20 > So the best would perhaps be to separate postgresql-libpq that always use= s the latest version (?) and have postgresqlNN-(client|server|contrib) like= now, except that the client of course is stripped from libpq? Yes that would do the trick. I have been busy in other area, but that is still in my target. Fine with m= e if you want to take over that job, I'll be happy to review/test it. Otherwise = I may send you a patch when I have something working. Best regards, Bapt --CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlXAgcAACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ex3WwCdGgcuSNj/vDcKCI+/CCTw6lTd SBgAnjf9GnnClQ2rOdV1ONEb+BI4ph1M =u7k6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --CE+1k2dSO48ffgeK-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 4 10:39:17 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98B819B1B86 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 10:39:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82BEC19A5 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 10:39:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 81F9E9B1B84; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 10:39:17 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 819F99B1B83 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 10:39:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72FCD19A3 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 10:39:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t74AdHmP063679 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 10:39:17 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id t74AdH0p063678; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 10:39:17 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201508041039.t74AdH0p063678@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 10:39:17 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 10:39:17 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/ucommon | 6.1.11 | 6.4.4 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ games/lgeneral | 1.2.6 | 1.3.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ science/gramps | 3.4.9 | 4.2.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 4 11:25:31 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F03609B30CA for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 11:25:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michipili@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D027A1E1C for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 11:25:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michipili@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id CD7BF9B30C9; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 11:25:31 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD1359B30C8 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 11:25:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michipili@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x235.google.com (mail-wi0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63EF51E19; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 11:25:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michipili@gmail.com) Received: by wibud3 with SMTP id ud3so172511621wib.1; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 04:25:29 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=r59DQSyccIF9qz1+4wHMn9UbZS4tCBCa2ZK6alqOidU=; b=PYTY7PwOQqoCRMEVjr1sB4moafyUDI5q0tkbgxTocP0htvp15QxWsVtuL0WsO3aELw fuaZP98fq+aAO08TsBnXNwXQ8tYazF6w0B4I9gtcRmMFMR1ZjWGviscJdXEHJ28LkawI tJPV9Qi6qwCFaGxHFzd7oOEkK44Obth3opLae17OibSNVGLT4CoEY4xsMnRu9hrUdLJt 5BrdNaTCqm7J2Y/0WZV0n907/yXuOtcEUHqI6Cle66b6t5bJmIbwMq+syITChy6Y3sOg IDmcA3MccisbJUEEb6nYA2X5shlIQSIcADq8JPqegvYHUSjfd3RyhlnW1WNudLEg9msD vYSg== X-Received: by 10.180.81.103 with SMTP id z7mr6660947wix.21.1438687529900; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 04:25:29 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.2.114] (p4FC1CC59.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.193.204.89]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l2sm1873484wib.11.2015.08.04.04.25.28 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 04 Aug 2015 04:25:29 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2102\)) Subject: Re: Proposal to fix postgresql package maintainance nightmare From: =?utf-8?Q?Michael_Gr=C3=BCnewald?= In-Reply-To: <20150721094627.GD21594@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 12:07:25 +0200 Cc: pgsql@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <3C35EF0A-38EF-452A-AC9D-21805F4A45DB@gmail.com> References: <20150721094627.GD21594@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> To: Baptiste Daroussin X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2102) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 11:25:32 -0000 > On 21 Jul 2015, at 11:46, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > - Impossible to have tools from both old and new version at the same = time (which > is necessary to upgrade db and prepare upgrades of db) =E2=80=A6 Could not jails be used to solve these issues by running the two (=E2=80=A6= ) required versions in jailed environments? There is a little bit of setup, but if by any = chance you are using some variation of the immutable server pattern, it should stay = very low. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 4 11:34:01 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E08E19B3438 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 11:34:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpaasial@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2381367 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 11:34:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpaasial@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id C16E49B3437; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 11:34:01 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C100C9B3436 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 11:34:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpaasial@gmail.com) Received: from mail-la0-x22a.google.com (mail-la0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ACF3366; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 11:34:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpaasial@gmail.com) Received: by labgo9 with SMTP id go9so5064688lab.3; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 04:33:59 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=m8gNyyKteoJb9nbFlq0nN4TJ6nANROtyb+aXqg5ismo=; b=EChY50iZ1ZtZh2MD6lwL8WeIV/shx5ZT9Pr8IKdAe0mx+4Mb8DhH24u3gCljXqVP1v T9kHvQ35/hSXAxaPVjLy5jXIjTPaw0fW14DYcekfdBMst1IN5gHNPBaeitUOgowh2n3Q tPpWHen8IggQl8UapQF1u5iHAb8dHTDokv78O3JWkIK+QE8mTV4cEY9kkn9wZGXiA06l 4dOvlWyho7p850wBsl/HHRd+aPHEeinyCEWh5qs9PGxrimCGgU57GB79hVHBFSx1gtcR sHBDHQXEpRHXYfl0++8U5TS3V9OI6aZcYaV8YY6VqBuC/toDzxHi/qbZwyZK4WrRaLBy qiZA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.37.196 with SMTP id a4mr2846450lak.59.1438688039305; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 04:33:59 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.152.1.234 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 04:33:59 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <3C35EF0A-38EF-452A-AC9D-21805F4A45DB@gmail.com> References: <20150721094627.GD21594@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <3C35EF0A-38EF-452A-AC9D-21805F4A45DB@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 14:33:59 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Proposal to fix postgresql package maintainance nightmare From: Kimmo Paasiala To: =?UTF-8?Q?Michael_Gr=C3=BCnewald?= Cc: Baptiste Daroussin , FreeBSD Ports , pgsql@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 11:34:02 -0000 On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Michael Gr=C3=BCnewald wrote: > >> On 21 Jul 2015, at 11:46, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> - Impossible to have tools from both old and new version at the same tim= e (which >> is necessary to upgrade db and prepare upgrades of db) =E2=80=A6 > > Could not jails be used to solve these issues by running the two (=E2=80= =A6) required versions > in jailed environments? There is a little bit of setup, but if by any ch= ance you > are using some variation of the immutable server pattern, it should stay = very low. > You can't ask an average FreeBSD user who just wants to upgrade his/her PostgreSQL installation to set up jails that would be only used for one task. The upgrade should be achievable with just 'pkg upgrade' without any extra work. -Kimmo From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 4 11:47:26 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D03279B3742 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 11:47:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DF71C7B for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 11:47:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from liminal.local (liminal.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3636:3bff:fed4:b0d6]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id t74BlHCr018714 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 12:47:18 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk t74BlHCr018714 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/t74BlHCr018714; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none; dkim-atps=neutral X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host liminal.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3636:3bff:fed4:b0d6] claimed to be liminal.local Subject: Re: Proposal to fix postgresql package maintainance nightmare To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20150721094627.GD21594@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <3C35EF0A-38EF-452A-AC9D-21805F4A45DB@gmail.com> From: Matthew Seaman X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <55C0A638.8050509@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 12:47:04 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fu7G1elc6UkE6tOB96xtFie5q11koIUwd" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 11:47:27 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --fu7G1elc6UkE6tOB96xtFie5q11koIUwd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 04/08/2015 12:33, Kimmo Paasiala wrote: > On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Michael Gr=C3=BCnewald wrote: >> >>> On 21 Jul 2015, at 11:46, Baptiste Daroussin wrote= : >>> - Impossible to have tools from both old and new version at the same = time (which >>> is necessary to upgrade db and prepare upgrades of db) =E2=80=A6 >> >> Could not jails be used to solve these issues by running the two (=E2=80= =A6) required versions >> in jailed environments? There is a little bit of setup, but if by any= chance you >> are using some variation of the immutable server pattern, it should st= ay very low. >> >=20 > You can't ask an average FreeBSD user who just wants to upgrade > his/her PostgreSQL installation to set up jails that would be only > used for one task. The upgrade should be achievable with just 'pkg > upgrade' without any extra work. It's unlikely that 'pkg upgrade' would ever grow the facility to automatically do a fast binary update of the data directory from one postgresql release to another one. However, being able to install things in such a way that pg_upgrade(1) could be used to do all that would be very much more useful than the current 'dump databases ; upgrade packages ; reload databases' fandango. Cheers, Matthew --fu7G1elc6UkE6tOB96xtFie5q11koIUwd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVwKZBXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATAGoP+wZ/G++WDp2BJoT2QK+aoC+r 1fUrCN3PLtwu5w0c7e9/FU1IwDJouSJj8FGXQ1rVnKi7YWsXj2hted3fyNTo1Q7I qTj8CIx0gbPAYI8DDGmppQhgtNbM/D6JIPuSuxyZlO59rR6kDndXyo6YaV4i+PVa p2QYSyEOF0kTl7aztmLOxJ2h6giwfHBCezJlGtPfqwAHv1sLYFtMJ2XF6/TuP2gb 8przPFsBhj1FW9AiDX6bypPPL7cTXpqvH2kpreU2Is83YTLvjP9LMGRt4RgmdMN/ oE46WAfNuvEsn+Lk1ZCoVtnCGb7yb6kGrDYRzkULRh05WiiH2LOVRqvYI2ERfsi/ 06ysg8aGIzrty4leGiFp3xfilP4GpLu/KIw+Ef4ccpTlAy5k6YJon1kzS2Ri4Fop iACODUNIbZ9tnhmspRT9X0KOMwbsZtjnCUzRN8Qf3xeVxapCqDvurvx6EFi8zrc2 dVeonmQlzcLKrlHzbOLa3KAG51IXg96yv6JCu4/SE/uGSaIAucVxxbqWSYctI5e8 wfRYD9hYZORfNlPgJhmOc/22a52qzOfFm20NQzDeqBbtYYbotF4Pp79/58t+8MN9 8WTHJwshbk8aCEuW/eeC4jA+qBvWQJpiVya9x79/Y133M8I30DWp0XMbzI4fdftt k5DA2vDKp+j44PzPJ9+/ =awWA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fu7G1elc6UkE6tOB96xtFie5q11koIUwd-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 4 15:03:27 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBDC89B3295 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 15:03:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpm@fbsd.es) Received: from imap10-3.ox.privateemail.com (imap10-3.ox.privateemail.com [192.64.116.216]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "privateemail.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9803DD07; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 15:03:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpm@fbsd.es) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A59952400E4; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 11:03:25 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at imap10.ox.privateemail.com Received: from mail.privateemail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (imap10.ox.privateemail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id CTlZ_UWxG6mU; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 11:03:25 -0400 (EDT) Received: from daemonlab (120.Red-83-58-115.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [83.58.115.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DE22A2400E6; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 11:03:24 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1438700587.2911.4.camel@fbsd.es> Subject: Re: lang/tcc unusable From: Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina To: Jung-uk Kim , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 17:03:07 +0200 In-Reply-To: <55C005D7.3050103@FreeBSD.org> References: <1438633579.6572.13.camel@fbsd.es> <55BFD033.8070507@FreeBSD.org> <1438634467.7343.2.camel@fbsd.es> <55BFDCA0.8040006@FreeBSD.org> <1438638022.7343.7.camel@fbsd.es> <55BFEAAA.4070008@FreeBSD.org> <1438644237.7343.13.camel@fbsd.es> <55C005D7.3050103@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-acFnJloNKQ/TcB7X4uYP" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.4 (3.16.4-2.fc22) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 15:03:27 -0000 --=-acFnJloNKQ/TcB7X4uYP Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 20:22 -0400, Jung-uk Kim escribi=C3=B3: > On 08/03/2015 19:23, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: > > El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 18:26 -0400, Jung-uk Kim escribi=C3=B3: > > > On 08/03/2015 17:40, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: > > > > El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 17:26 -0400, Jung-uk Kim escribi=C3=B3: > > > > > On 08/03/2015 16:41, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: > > > > > > El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 16:33 -0400, Jung-uk Kim=20 > > > > > > escribi=C3=B3: > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > Hi Jung-uk, > > > > > > > On 08/03/2015 16:26, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi people, > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > Recently I added amd64 support to TinyCC, but I=20 > > > > > > > > encounter the following problem trying to compile a=20 > > > > > > > > simple code. > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > #include > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > int main(){ printf("hello, world!\n); return 0; } > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > % tcc -o hello hello.c In file included from > > > > > > > > hello.c:1: /usr/include/stdio.h:63: error: ';' expected > > > > > > > > (got "va_list") > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > I guess that some change introduced in 'stdio.h' causes > > > > > > > > this weird behaviour. Last time that TCC worked fine > > > > > > > > was on FreeBSD 9.1 -RELEASE/i386. > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > Also I reported this problem in the tinycc-devel=20 > > > > > > > > mailing list [1] > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > I haven't tried tcc but '"' is missing for the printf(). > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > Yes, it was a typo here :) > > > > >=20 > > > > > It seems it's a known tcc bug: > > > > >=20 > > > > > http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?30966 > > > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > > > Is there something that we can do about it? > > > >=20 > > > > Thanks for pointing me, jkim@ > > >=20 > > > It seems there is no easy way to fix this problem without=20 > > > touching src tree, e.g., > > >=20 > > > --- sys/x86/include/_types.h (revision 286256) +++=20 > > > sys/x86/include/_types.h (working copy) @@ -152,7 +152,7=20 > > > @@ */=20 > > > #ifdef __GNUCLIKE_BUILTIN_VARARGS typedef __builtin_va_lis > > > t=20 > > > __va_list; /* internally known to gcc */ -#elif=20 > > > defined(lint)=20 > > > +#elif defined(__TINYC__) || defined(lint) typedef char *=20 > > > __va_list; /* pretend */ #endif #if=20 > > > defined(__GNUC_VA_LIST_COMPATIBILITY) && > > > !defined(__GNUC_VA_LIST) \ > > >=20 > >=20 > > If you need doing some changes into the src tree. >=20 > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/286265 >=20 That's OK!=20 > > So, what do you recommend in such case? Would it be much trouble=20 > > add the necessary changes to run TCC again? Furthermore, TinyCC=20 > > developer has ignored this issue completely. >=20 > The only hack I see is defining __va_list as a macro from libtcc.c=20 > but > it is ugly. >=20 Probably this should be discussed in the tinycc-devel ML. In the meanwhile we can try your dirty hack :-) -- Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina PGP fingerprint =3D C60E 9497 5302 793B CC2D BB89 A1F3 5D66 E6D0 5453 --=-acFnJloNKQ/TcB7X4uYP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAABCAAGBQJVwNQrAAoJEKHzXWbm0FRTJRIH/R1SWlYRFPhv+o9TvwNgaoD2 mGoz2/Y/KMnITTqzTBqEy2uDC0VxvFEEX9wGuF6AVigQHJo+d4fGzbBo05RzOdp4 u8knAcIlI3dLq5ZTQzAwOyq16nfjrN8acYrkBdspIoaa18qGAuyCFdJf964ZhChY FOM6I9RN5zqFwthzE7JIW273BdqajCTW56NxQQtH0/HAsTOodhtaWqYyFgQz8E5+ Yc3vF9ElRaIoY6StJKdJ9h+1H9BAxOSxTK4YNL6FW5z8o+WCh3wNsjB00r4R6zlJ KafjjLfUD8mcplmSvdu3InoChcKdKVUOjUF+3e9ITIUMWqZEvhf59x91ILs68to= =Ixqo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-acFnJloNKQ/TcB7X4uYP-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 4 16:28:36 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6591D9B2C39 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 16:28:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from loganaden@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44F702FE for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 16:28:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from loganaden@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 443729B2C38; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 16:28:36 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43D839B2C36 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 16:28:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from loganaden@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-x22f.google.com (mail-pa0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 159392F9; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 16:28:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from loganaden@gmail.com) Received: by padck2 with SMTP id ck2so12458471pad.0; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 09:28:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=71PGSRnrrnH8a8l06EwO0uqldWu1+Qhhn+S2d89JHjo=; b=dgWVIpXnZMuRarCiACC8i4vBc6eUZ1G0oIFIWM+TbKC7uQgoMoVqxZ3An4R0oA/Wh3 ctAxwPJ/2jSgBlWLROEYULegQCObX0DiL6arEzRpIZ5H97ZFs9+lyuDQuQPqb5g1LQ3X 97UeFvmEOvS2x0/j1o8D5ht81VqCm1M2uLN1AOi0aIfkIaIHtqXVpT6P+G8QopH4B02J EBSfzsvHXmk1mXXMPyUntmn4puB8LTA5D9JsPWgOit6nL7mCSxsGD3wZgKRTwiGr11NV F5jYy/cMhx9gf3c99h/03vdxcJiHLOkzZdisPvgheN2hsQtEbckAc1FEFsm/2vuiQBLZ 6k4w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.69.2.162 with SMTP id bp2mr9238974pbd.99.1438705715005; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 09:28:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.66.236.134 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 09:28:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <55AC1B73.1070807@sorbs.net> References: <55AB91ED.3080908@sorbs.net> <9917125A-6342-4F62-B374-E4F456EDC015@FreeBSD.org> <55ABBFEC.60302@sorbs.net> <20150719154449.GD50618@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <55ABD3EA.8010704@sorbs.net> <20150719165211.GE50618@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <55AC08F5.3030900@sorbs.net> <89AD420213656BC19239E265@atuin.in.mat.cc> <55AC148B.2060601@sorbs.net> <529038A0BB697476BFB7074F@atuin.in.mat.cc> <55AC1B73.1070807@sorbs.net> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 16:28:34 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Self committing... allowed or not? From: Loganaden Velvindron To: Michelle Sullivan Cc: Mathieu Arnold , ports@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin , Dimitry Andric Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 16:28:36 -0000 I would like to know how hard would it be for our FreeBSD experts to hack SVN to allow port maintainers commit to individual ports to speed up the process :p ? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 4 17:02:42 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E77D79B363F for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 17:02:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B74B1A1 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 17:02:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from liminal.local ([192.168.100.2]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id t74H2amU024848 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 18:02:36 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk t74H2amU024848 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/t74H2amU024848; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none; dkim-atps=neutral X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host [192.168.100.2] claimed to be liminal.local Subject: Re: Self committing... allowed or not? To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <55AB91ED.3080908@sorbs.net> <9917125A-6342-4F62-B374-E4F456EDC015@FreeBSD.org> <55ABBFEC.60302@sorbs.net> <20150719154449.GD50618@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <55ABD3EA.8010704@sorbs.net> <20150719165211.GE50618@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <55AC08F5.3030900@sorbs.net> <89AD420213656BC19239E265@atuin.in.mat.cc> <55AC148B.2060601@sorbs.net> <529038A0BB697476BFB7074F@atuin.in.mat.cc> <55AC1B73.1070807@sorbs.net> From: Matthew Seaman X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <55C0F02C.1020707@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 18:02:36 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="VL8q2GaBe4IOSvWvNWj30n3iuC7gmUQQU" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 17:02:42 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --VL8q2GaBe4IOSvWvNWj30n3iuC7gmUQQU Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 04/08/2015 17:28, Loganaden Velvindron wrote: > I would like to know how hard would it be for our FreeBSD experts to > hack SVN to allow port maintainers commit to individual ports to speed > up the process :p ? Technically that's probably not too difficult. Debian has a system like that, using PGP signatures for authentication, which we could probably steal^Wcopy without too much trouble. The real kicker though is about maintaining code quality. This is pretty much why committers exist: they are people who have shown competence in dealing with src / ports / docs whatever and have demonstrated they can maintain standards. One of a committers primary functions is to either fix or get the submitter to fix problems with submissions before committing. Now, it's almost certainly true that many port maintainers who aren't already committers would be perfectly competent at updating their own ports. Chances are though if such a maintainer has been sufficiently active and has submitted enough to establish their competence then they'd be a definite prospect as a full-blown committer anyhow. ie. if you're good enough to commit changes to your own ports, then you're pretty much good enough to commit changes to any port, so you might as well have a ports commit bit. Cheers, Matthew --VL8q2GaBe4IOSvWvNWj30n3iuC7gmUQQU Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.20 (Darwin) iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVwPAsXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkAT/JQP/RwvUZwKfitJt8LGa856wnz3 3KNRJcjjjbRZMio2VrcNnY9R2GA5Q37CwVBoembO/f4BaqfV70Ps3q1jVS3KeEiU 0YiogKAj5SavZZgUZuzkugNN0rdY3VVfoJ074YfGOpu2RdlBdV1VEafz7MMM460F MA6JRvLmFFx5yrzksHXfzi1bq1xMLggymjvwLBGLmy7hNUS6zLRqJCVtPVkN8IQc mEYX7LNxHPwpieMH1OhEI3jTjg82Hy0/5jhTerkEK3xYW6V7MgD5irXTjeYI/dLV Ri1/3cUgBceIPsBp4uucL1QxZSR/6vopDSxXhDjahk66noQg+LQga27TIenZnd/u UaMK0Z9Y7br6E8MPAKUYkhyij47Ov0zqAlyjduyc4/Hx3eDdzVuqlzxHSHNVjEpr SKi2jTTZqV7bEMxAyermBAkklNNxL54tbLEAiAubl9FvvihQ+vJXNgeFtlAx1rvp we8C7vX73EepPsHS6N1pknEGKtNwvOwrJ1YiJqrOKIjZRxEM/rN1bqwUugOCDBOa zqlywqffd1Vb8jp3hMh3MOrTdGggTyr7uemTIZ787rx+VrT/qaV62yZFu864fRug eOoKg4SzrTOqUnbe7HOtJUXNGgDQYsi7shXQW/E+dxcHtVmEId6l6Oz8PvXXGFqD Gk41v6oGBIgqOM6RvQAk =qs30 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --VL8q2GaBe4IOSvWvNWj30n3iuC7gmUQQU-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 4 17:52:49 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F7339B2352 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 17:52:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pvoigt@uos.de) Received: from mout.kundenserver.de (mout.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.187]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.kundenserver.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1AF6D11C5 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 17:52:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pvoigt@uos.de) Received: from spock.drpetervoigt.private ([84.155.91.68]) by mrelayeu.kundenserver.de (mreue001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MFUge-1Zavzt0AOy-00EQ4e; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 19:52:37 +0200 Received: from kirk.drpetervoigt.private (kirk.drpetervoigt.private [192.168.1.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: pvoigt) by spock.drpetervoigt.private (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 219D44A03345; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 19:52:36 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 19:52:17 +0200 From: "Dr. Peter Voigt" To: Kevin Oberman Cc: Koop Mast , FreeBSD Ports ML Subject: Re: Problems with update to print/tex-luatex Message-ID: <20150804195217.5d56d70c@kirk.drpetervoigt.private> In-Reply-To: References: Organization: =?UTF-8?B?VW5pdmVyc2l0w6R0IE9zbmFicsO8Y2s=?= X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.10.1 (GTK+ 2.24.23; x86_64-suse-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:MC+xlpeboueV6uu/e0xyIdXwaCtR70r/a1f3RzHgrYfJyFDoaHc bBsKBuYawKP3hOgtNTcY5wxSNKVfIasJfV+1l/oUIYj3kN4yw/ogB+5Cga99CnkbgNmK9VK bvdaPZVH0xI1Ra66LUJofWE20JvYv7MQLV05gRDtUv347NLOE7ZMQZbxaK/ZtjDDNGy6D38 1Q75XAShhgmc9K8SHVmmA== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:2Ho+OC9u+J4=:RZWMyezuSNeTHn3mAKZF1G EROrf5tR9OAaOplmNOk4MYAWbYHYIIqqYyNhsh6pSBLnt17DncvNeis8aMkztjn6mAmdxinHV iJVxTQ2ggdtN9h4RUGHUWpLHctHYX2sb1YgF81XgBBIzUdRAlBsiXs5bLLH/JH8Fd9W5mbZ64 3fKAvFirOn53lJjPcy058mJ8g5Z7y499Bkl1DzKLXO13t766tZgeaitbyBvBLcMWaMlro8hxK fi4Wnax3sY6ZrbKIAxCL7nRF649ocKTXomGK67N6cXUf7h20vipt4jBsONJHHVFhAiOjPAd77 /efO4lTtbYy4kUgtywxgUJpmqFnGOp+GWE4KqgCI+MS0G8JU9V/4ORAsLpSW5wGX4+xdqDqBU LI4HQwXfW5BYa+OqHA3uoriRyj+08EfEoU9QMWuf5bvPw8Yy3m4MxmVgLcaL8J8+YruUgz+9I R5YjrjeC5V/gw8VuDVfRJUTJXjbLSHAaP+OW01b25RViMENl5aAHYqnyh7HUWRvQXL02KaCJr X62CsHL6JDpohgD73AfsBTNfiRpVLLUZIfY5tw4xNNHBGe1c/BMz/vzziyGWUCeQOaSdRaAZr eLNNOBIgYyLYNKvMleAVGVEl0DxH/x5u9BZXNJ7qJAy3eLa2BQHOIEe4eHr8um5+XjcnvCLW1 VJhfRsWiMZ5HMJYGMP7G4mi0OGlDaf+eF6NQ+J7t+xZa3mQ== X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 17:52:49 -0000 On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 13:04:19 -0700 Kevin Oberman wrote: > I was able to get the port installed by deleting the existing port > (pkg delete tex-luatex) and > deleting work/.stage_done.luatex._usr_local and re-running stage and > install. Sorry for making noise, but I somehow managed to miss your above fix and proposed almost the same. The only difference: I did not manually delete anything under work/ and just re-run portmaster after "pkg delete tex-luatex". Peter From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 4 18:12:02 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EE409B28A8 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 18:12:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 085741DBC for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 18:12:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from [89.204.138.122] (helo=localhost.unixarea.de) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1ZMggv-0002cD-Rc; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 20:11:58 +0200 Received: from localhost.my.domain (c720-r276659 [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.unixarea.de (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t74IButB002077 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 4 Aug 2015 20:11:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t74IBuJw002076; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 20:11:56 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 20:11:55 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: udo.schweigert@siemens.com Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Fwd: broken strings compiled-in into mutt Message-ID: <20150804181155.GA2043@c720-r276659> Reply-To: Matthias Apitz Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , udo.schweigert@siemens.com, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT r269739 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 89.204.138.122 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 18:12:02 -0000 Hello Udo (as maintainer), Maybe it's a FreeBSD issue, rather than a mutt one? matthias ----- Forwarded message from Matthias Apitz ----- Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 16:54:58 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: mutt-users@mutt.org Subject: broken strings compiled-in into mutt Hello, I have compiled on FreeBSD CURRENT some 1660 ports, among them my beloved mutt, and all went fine. I wanted to check mutt if it has used the correct compiler options and configure value and have run $ mutt -v The output is broken as you can see in the attached file and the strings are like this broken in the binary itself, i.e. it is not only an display issue. mutt itself starts. The string contains a \r where it should have 'r' and a \t where it should have a 't', ... Any ideas? Let me know if you need the log of the make engine poudriere for this. matthias -- Matthias Apitz | /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign: E-mail: guru@unixarea.de | \ / - No HTML/RTF in E-mail WWW: http://www.unixarea.de/ | X - No proprietary attachments phone: +49-176-38902045 | / \ - Respect for open standards | en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCII_Ribbon_Campaign $ mutt -v > /mnt/guru/mutt.err Mutt 1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Copyright (C) 1996-2009 Michael R. Elkins and others. Mutt comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `mutt -vv'. Mutt is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; type `mutt -vv' for details. System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT (amd64) ncurses: ncurses 5.9.20140222 (compiled with 5.9) libiconv: 1.14 libidn: 1.31 (compiled with 1.31) hcache backend: Berkeley DB 5.3.28: (September 9, 2013) Compiler: F eeBSD clang ve sion 3.5.0 ( ags/RELEASE_350/final 216957) 20141124 Ta ge : x86_64-unknown-f eebsd11.0 Th ead model: posix clang: wa ning: a gumen unused du ing compila ion: '-I /us /local/include' Configure options: '--disable-fcn l' '--wi h-ssl=/us ' '--wi h-docdi =/us /local/sha e/doc/mu ' '--sysconfdi =/us /local/e c' '--enable-ex e nal-do lock' '--enable-pop' '--enable-imap' '--disable-wa nings' '--wi h-sasl=/us /local' '--disable-flock' '--enable-locales-fix' '--wi h-libiconv-p efix=/us /local' '--wi h-idn' '--disable-gpgme' '--enable-sm p' '--enable-debug' '--enable-comp essed' '--enable-hcache' '--wi hou -gdbm' '--wi h-bdb' '--wi hou -qdbm' '--p efix=/us /local' '--locals a edi =/va ' '--mandi =/us /local/man' '--infodi =/us /local/info/' '--build=amd64-po bld-f eebsd11.0' 'build_alias=amd64-po bld-f eebsd11.0' 'CC=clang -I/us /local/include' 'CFLAGS=-pipe -g -fs ack-p o ec o -fno-s ic -aliasing' 'LDFLAGS= -L/us /local/lib -Wl,- pa h=/us /local/lib:/us /lib -l infow -Wl,- pa h=/us /lib:/us /local/lib -fs ack-p o ec o ' 'LIBS=' 'CPPFLAGS=' 'CPP=clang-cpp' Compilation CFLAGS: -pipe -g -fs ack-p o ec o -fno-s ic -aliasing Compile options: -DOMAIN +DEBUG -HOMESPOOL +USE_SETGID +USE_DOTLOCK +DL_STANDALONE -USE_FCNTL -USE_FLOCK +USE_POP +USE_IMAP +USE_SMTP +USE_SSL_OPENSSL -USE_SSL_GNUTLS +USE_SASL -USE_GSS +HAVE_GETADDRINFO +HAVE_REGCOMP -USE_GNU_REGEX +COMPRESSED +HAVE_COLOR +HAVE_START_COLOR +HAVE_TYPEAHEAD +HAVE_BKGDSET +HAVE_CURS_SET +HAVE_META +HAVE_RESIZETERM +CRYPT_BACKEND_CLASSIC_PGP +CRYPT_BACKEND_CLASSIC_SMIME -CRYPT_BACKEND_GPGME -EXACT_ADDRESS -SUN_ATTACHMENT +ENABLE_NLS +LOCALES_HACK +HAVE_WC_FUNCS +HAVE_LANGINFO_CODESET +HAVE_LANGINFO_YESEXPR +HAVE_ICONV -ICONV_NONTRANS +HAVE_LIBIDN +HAVE_GETSID +USE_HCACHE -ISPELL SENDMAIL="/usr/sbin/sendmail" MAILPATH="/var/mail" PKGDATADIR="/usr/local/share/mutt" SYSCONFDIR="/usr/local/etc" EXECSHELL="/bin/sh" -MIXMASTER To contact the developers, please mail to . To report a bug, please visit http://bugs.mutt.org/. patch-1.5.20.bk.trash_folder-purge_message.1 patch-1.5.23.sidebar.20140412.txt patch-1.5.4.cd.ifdef.1 patch-1.5.6.cb.reverse_reply.2 patch-1.5.7.ust.maildir-mtime.2 patch-1.5.0.ats.date_conditional.1 dgc.deepif.1 vvv.quote vvv.initials rr.compressed $ strings /usr/local/bin/mutt | egrep 'eeBSD |216957' >> /mnt/guru/mutt.err eeBSD clang ve sion 3.5.0 ( ags/RELEASE_350/final 216957) 20141124 $ mutt -v | od -c >> /mnt/guru/mutt.err 0000000 M u t t 1 . 5 . 2 3 ( 2 0 1 0000020 4 - 0 3 - 1 2 ) \n C o p y r i g 0000040 h t ( C ) 1 9 9 6 - 2 0 0 9 0000060 M i c h a e l R . E l k i 0000100 n s a n d o t h e r s . \n M 0000120 u t t c o m e s w i t h A 0000140 B S O L U T E L Y N O W A R 0000160 R A N T Y ; f o r d e t a i 0000200 l s t y p e ` m u t t - v 0000220 v ' . \n M u t t i s f r e e 0000240 s o f t w a r e , a n d y 0000260 o u a r e w e l c o m e t 0000300 o r e d i s t r i b u t e i 0000320 t \n u n d e r c e r t a i n 0000340 c o n d i t i o n s ; t y p e 0000360 ` m u t t - v v ' f o r 0000400 d e t a i l s . \n \n S y s t e m 0000420 : F r e e B S D 1 1 . 0 - C 0000440 U R R E N T ( a m d 6 4 ) \n n 0000460 c u r s e s : n c u r s e s 0000500 5 . 9 . 2 0 1 4 0 2 2 2 ( c o 0000520 m p i l e d w i t h 5 . 9 ) 0000540 \n l i b i c o n v : 1 . 1 4 \n 0000560 l i b i d n : 1 . 3 1 ( c o 0000600 m p i l e d w i t h 1 . 3 1 0000620 ) \n h c a c h e b a c k e n d 0000640 : B e r k e l e y D B 5 . 0000660 3 . 2 8 : ( S e p t e m b e r 0000700 9 , 2 0 1 3 ) \n \n C o m p 0000720 i l e r : \n F \r e e B S D c l 0000740 a n g v e \r s i o n 3 . 5 . 0000760 0 ( \t a g s / R E L E A S E _ 0001000 3 5 0 / f i n a l 2 1 6 9 5 7 0001020 ) 2 0 1 4 1 1 2 4 \n T a \r g e 0001040 \t : x 8 6 _ 6 4 - u n k n o w 0001060 n - f \r e e b s d 1 1 . 0 \n T h 0001100 \r e a d m o d e l : p o s i 0001120 x \n c l a n g : w a \r n i n g 0001140 : a \r g u m e n \t u n u s e 0001160 d d u \r i n g c o m p i l a 0001200 \t i o n : ' - I / u s \r / l 0001220 o c a l / i n c l u d e ' \n \n C 0001240 o n f i g u r e o p t i o n s 0001260 : ' - - d i s a b l e - f c n 0001300 \t l ' ' - - w i \t h - s s l = 0001320 / u s \r ' ' - - w i \t h - d o 0001340 c d i \r = / u s \r / l o c a l / 0001360 s h a \r e / d o c / m u \t \t ' 0001400 ' - - s y s c o n f d i \r = / u 0001420 s \r / l o c a l / e \t c ' ' - 0001440 - e n a b l e - e x \t e \r n a l 0001460 - d o \t l o c k ' ' - - e n a 0001500 b l e - p o p ' ' - - e n a b 0001520 l e - i m a p ' ' - - d i s a 0001540 b l e - w a \r n i n g s ' ' - 0001560 - w i \t h - s a s l = / u s \r / 0001600 l o c a l ' ' - - d i s a b l 0001620 e - f l o c k ' ' - - e n a b 0001640 l e - l o c a l e s - f i x ' 0001660 ' - - w i \t h - l i b i c o n v 0001700 - p \r e f i x = / u s \r / l o c 0001720 a l ' ' - - w i \t h - i d n ' 0001740 ' - - d i s a b l e - g p g m 0001760 e ' ' - - e n a b l e - s m \t 0002000 p ' ' - - e n a b l e - d e b 0002020 u g ' ' - - e n a b l e - c o 0002040 m p \r e s s e d ' ' - - e n a 0002060 b l e - h c a c h e ' ' - - w 0002100 i \t h o u \t - g d b m ' ' - - 0002120 w i \t h - b d b ' ' - - w i \t 0002140 h o u \t - q d b m ' ' - - p \r 0002160 e f i x = / u s \r / l o c a l ' 0002200 ' - - l o c a l s \t a \t e d i 0002220 \r = / v a \r ' ' - - m a n d i 0002240 \r = / u s \r / l o c a l / m a n 0002260 ' ' - - i n f o d i \r = / u s 0002300 \r / l o c a l / i n f o / ' ' 0002320 - - b u i l d = a m d 6 4 - p o 0002340 \r \t b l d - f \r e e b s d 1 1 . 0002360 0 ' ' b u i l d _ a l i a s = 0002400 a m d 6 4 - p o \r \t b l d - f \r 0002420 e e b s d 1 1 . 0 ' ' C C = c 0002440 l a n g - I / u s \r / l o c a 0002460 l / i n c l u d e ' ' C F L A 0002500 G S = - p i p e - g - f 0002520 s \t a c k - p \r o \t e c \t o \r 0002540 - f n o - s \t \r i c \t - a l i a 0002560 s i n g ' ' L D F L A G S = 0002600 - L / u s \r / l o c a l / l i b 0002620 - W l , - \r p a \t h = / u s \r 0002640 / l o c a l / l i b : / u s \r / 0002660 l i b - l \t i n f o w - 0002700 W l , - \r p a \t h = / u s \r / l 0002720 i b : / u s \r / l o c a l / l i 0002740 b - f s \t a c k - p \r o \t e c 0002760 \t o \r ' ' L I B S = ' ' C P 0003000 P F L A G S = ' ' C P P = c l 0003020 a n g - c p p ' \n \n C o m p i l 0003040 a t i o n C F L A G S : - p 0003060 i p e - g - f s \t a c k 0003100 - p \r o \t e c \t o \r - f n o - 0003120 s \t \r i c \t - a l i a s i n g \n 0003140 \n C o m p i l e o p t i o n s 0003160 : \n - D O M A I N \n + D E B U G 0003200 \n - H O M E S P O O L + U S 0003220 E _ S E T G I D + U S E _ D 0003240 O T L O C K + D L _ S T A N 0003260 D A L O N E - U S E _ F C N 0003300 T L - U S E _ F L O C K 0003320 \n + U S E _ P O P + U S E 0003340 _ I M A P + U S E _ S M T P 0003360 \n + U S E _ S S L _ O P E N 0003400 S S L - U S E _ S S L _ G N 0003420 U T L S + U S E _ S A S L 0003440 - U S E _ G S S + H A V E 0003460 _ G E T A D D R I N F O \n + 0003500 H A V E _ R E G C O M P - U 0003520 S E _ G N U _ R E G E X + C 0003540 O M P R E S S E D \n + H A V 0003560 E _ C O L O R + H A V E _ S 0003600 T A R T _ C O L O R + H A V 0003620 E _ T Y P E A H E A D + H A 0003640 V E _ B K G D S E T \n + H A 0003660 V E _ C U R S _ S E T + H A 0003700 V E _ M E T A + H A V E _ R 0003720 E S I Z E T E R M \n + C R Y 0003740 P T _ B A C K E N D _ C L A S S 0003760 I C _ P G P + C R Y P T _ B 0004000 A C K E N D _ C L A S S I C _ S 0004020 M I M E - C R Y P T _ B A C 0004040 K E N D _ G P G M E \n - E X 0004060 A C T _ A D D R E S S - S U 0004100 N _ A T T A C H M E N T \n + 0004120 E N A B L E _ N L S + L O C 0004140 A L E S _ H A C K + H A V E 0004160 _ W C _ F U N C S + H A V E 0004200 _ L A N G I N F O _ C O D E S E 0004220 T + H A V E _ L A N G I N F 0004240 O _ Y E S E X P R \n + H A V 0004260 E _ I C O N V - I C O N V _ 0004300 N O N T R A N S + H A V E _ 0004320 L I B I D N + H A V E _ G E 0004340 T S I D + U S E _ H C A C H 0004360 E \n - I S P E L L \n S E N D 0004400 M A I L = " / u s r / s b i n / 0004420 s e n d m a i l " \n M A I L P A 0004440 T H = " / v a r / m a i l " \n P 0004460 K G D A T A D I R = " / u s r / 0004500 l o c a l / s h a r e / m u t t 0004520 " \n S Y S C O N F D I R = " / u 0004540 s r / l o c a l / e t c " \n E X 0004560 E C S H E L L = " / b i n / s h 0004600 " \n - M I X M A S T E R \n T o 0004620 c o n t a c t t h e d e v e 0004640 l o p e r s , p l e a s e m 0004660 a i l t o < m u t t - d e v 0004700 @ m u t t . o r g > . \n T o r 0004720 e p o r t a b u g , p l e 0004740 a s e v i s i t h t t p : / 0004760 / b u g s . m u t t . o r g / . 0005000 \n \n p a t c h - 1 . 5 . 2 0 . b 0005020 k . t r a s h _ f o l d e r - p 0005040 u r g e _ m e s s a g e . 1 \n p 0005060 a t c h - 1 . 5 . 2 3 . s i d e 0005100 b a r . 2 0 1 4 0 4 1 2 . t x t 0005120 \n p a t c h - 1 . 5 . 4 . c d . 0005140 i f d e f . 1 \n p a t c h - 1 . 0005160 5 . 6 . c b . r e v e r s e _ r 0005200 e p l y . 2 \n p a t c h - 1 . 5 0005220 . 7 . u s t . m a i l d i r - m 0005240 t i m e . 2 \n p a t c h - 1 . 5 0005260 . 0 . a t s . d a t e _ c o n d 0005300 i t i o n a l . 1 \n d g c . d e 0005320 e p i f . 1 \n v v v . q u o t e 0005340 \n v v v . i n i t i a l s \n r r 0005360 . c o m p r e s s e d \n 0005374 ----- End forwarded message ----- -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ guru@unixarea.de, http://www.unixarea.de/ ☎ +49-176-38902045 No! Nein! ¡No! Όχι! -- Ευχαριστούμε! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 4 19:48:23 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00DD29B35F6 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 19:48:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4E3F1C8 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 19:48:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ZMiCG-000GHd-Jk; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 21:48:24 +0200 Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 21:48:24 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Matthias Apitz , udo.schweigert@siemens.com, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: broken strings compiled-in into mutt Message-ID: <20150804194824.GC40589@home.opsec.eu> References: <20150804181155.GA2043@c720-r276659> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150804181155.GA2043@c720-r276659> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 19:48:23 -0000 Hi! > Hello Udo (as maintainer), > > Maybe it's a FreeBSD issue, rather than a mutt one? I see similar effects on 10.1-amd64. Mutt 1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Copyright (C) 1996-2009 Michael R. Elkins and others. Mutt comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `mutt -vv'. Mutt is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it under certain conditions; type `mutt -vv' for details. System: FreeBSD 10.2-RC2 (amd64) ncurses: ncurses 5.7.20081102 (compiled with 5.7) libiconv: 1.14 libidn: 1.31 (compiled with 1.29) Compiler: F eeBSD clang ve sion 3.4.1 ( ags/RELEASE_34/do 1-final 208032) 20140512 Ta ge : x86_64-unknown-f eebsd10.1 Th ead model: posix Selec ed GCC ins alla ion: cc: wa ning: a gumen unused du ing compila ion: '-I /us /local/include' Configure options: '--disable-fcn l' '--wi h-ssl=/us ' '--wi h-docdi =/us /local/sha e/doc/mu ' '--sysconfdi =/us /local/e c' '--enable-ex e nal-do lock' '--enable-pop' '--enable-imap' '--disable-wa nings' '--disable-flock' '--wi h-libiconv-p efix=/us /local' '--wi h-idn' '--disable-gpgme' '--enable-sm p' '--enable-debug' '--enable-comp essed' '--disable-hcache' '--p efix=/us /local' '--locals a edi =/va ' '--mandi =/us /local/man' '--infodi =/us /local/info/' '--build=amd64-po bld-f eebsd10.1' 'build_alias=amd64-po bld-f eebsd10.1' 'CC=cc -I/us /local/include' 'CFLAGS=-pipe -g -fs ack-p o ec o -fno-s ic -aliasing' 'LDFLAGS= -L/us /local/lib -Wl,- pa h=/us /local/lib:/us /lib -l infow -Wl,- pa h=/us /lib:/us /local/lib -fs ack-p o ec o ' 'LIBS=' 'CPPFLAGS=' 'CPP=cpp' Compilation CFLAGS: -pipe -g -fs ack-p o ec o -fno-s ic -aliasing Compile options: -DOMAIN +DEBUG -HOMESPOOL +USE_SETGID +USE_DOTLOCK +DL_STANDALONE -USE_FCNTL -USE_FLOCK +USE_POP +USE_IMAP +USE_SMTP +USE_SSL_OPENSSL -USE_SSL_GNUTLS -USE_SASL -USE_GSS +HAVE_GETADDRINFO +HAVE_REGCOMP -USE_GNU_REGEX +COMPRESSED +HAVE_COLOR +HAVE_START_COLOR +HAVE_TYPEAHEAD +HAVE_BKGDSET +HAVE_CURS_SET +HAVE_META +HAVE_RESIZETERM +CRYPT_BACKEND_CLASSIC_PGP +CRYPT_BACKEND_CLASSIC_SMIME -CRYPT_BACKEND_GPGME -EXACT_ADDRESS -SUN_ATTACHMENT +ENABLE_NLS -LOCALES_HACK +HAVE_WC_FUNCS +HAVE_LANGINFO_CODESET +HAVE_LANGINFO_YESEXPR +HAVE_ICONV -ICONV_NONTRANS +HAVE_LIBIDN +HAVE_GETSID -USE_HCACHE -ISPELL SENDMAIL="/usr/sbin/sendmail" MAILPATH="/var/mail" PKGDATADIR="/usr/local/share/mutt" SYSCONFDIR="/usr/local/etc" EXECSHELL="/bin/sh" -MIXMASTER To contact the developers, please mail to . To report a bug, please visit http://bugs.mutt.org/. patch-1.5.4.cd.ifdef.1 patch-1.5.0.ats.date_conditional.1 dgc.deepif.1 vvv.quote vvv.initials rr.compressed -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 4 20:48:35 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6951F9B3686 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 20:48:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-x234.google.com (mail-ob0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30166D80 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 20:48:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by obdeg2 with SMTP id eg2so16664598obd.0 for ; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 13:48:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ioqbdajmowt0byXCb5WUWsXBgRtBaPvDIpLv0Qk6lUs=; b=wZTvizdM9Z+Asa7Q2DO/vJC+DU1bWdsZ3+WiLcFABOg3i+/Us22qDjmSWmzWI9WORb CyjapinZ/mmVVzLLBRlVVhrygCN/6PNLB6S1PQuwISiJjZanIiDFMhhKulsr6RyzamDr 3mvZkgJlyh3rF7IarfFH4113+WLRUVOLQIJ9rcyL6O13eEMO4woarzbN8xjXEQxiv7Cg nBc4FVefaKZfj0mciYmWXf8HVeHHrTEgPHOv+0NtGPpHYqcXOV1dANi/o5Gox91RsE5S ArLF+6M45xv6mRvdBZFmbyoKw5a7LWzTCvSqKiKazUoO8VKqDwX93feDjLiggV5QDEr9 YW3w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.97.10 with SMTP id dw10mr5195493obb.60.1438721314311; Tue, 04 Aug 2015 13:48:34 -0700 (PDT) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.202.221.69 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 13:48:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150804195217.5d56d70c@kirk.drpetervoigt.private> References: <20150804195217.5d56d70c@kirk.drpetervoigt.private> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 13:48:34 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: CeA5BdqrKY38M_roX7SO2cb0xYY Message-ID: Subject: Re: Problems with update to print/tex-luatex From: Kevin Oberman To: "Dr. Peter Voigt" Cc: Koop Mast , FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 20:48:35 -0000 On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Dr. Peter Voigt wrote: > On Mon, 3 Aug 2015 13:04:19 -0700 > Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > I was able to get the port installed by deleting the existing port > > (pkg delete tex-luatex) and > > deleting work/.stage_done.luatex._usr_local and re-running stage and > > install. > > Sorry for making noise, but I somehow managed to miss your above fix and > proposed almost the same. The only difference: I did not manually > delete anything under work/ and just re-run portmaster after "pkg delete > tex-luatex". > > Peter > I was just trying to be efficient. By deleting the .stage_done file I could then make install without needing to actually rebuild anything. (portmaster -C). If you just run portmaster again (no "-C"), it should install fine, too. -- Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 4 21:27:22 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97FE29B3FF8 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 21:27:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from girgen@pingpong.net) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8040E129C for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 21:27:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from girgen@pingpong.net) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 7F8159B3FF7; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 21:27:22 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F1BA9B3FF6 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 21:27:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from girgen@pingpong.net) Received: from mail.pingpong.net (mail.pingpong.net [79.136.116.202]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C8D01291; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 21:27:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from girgen@pingpong.net) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (athedsl-249434.home.otenet.gr [85.73.21.248]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.pingpong.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EB1ACB210; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 23:27:18 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Proposal to fix postgresql package maintainance nightmare From: Palle Girgensohn X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12H143) In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 00:26:14 +0300 Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Michael_Gr=C3=BCnewald?= , Baptiste Daroussin , FreeBSD Ports , "pgsql@freebsd.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <4E33531E-0290-4E49-8A23-C7960603A262@pingpong.net> References: <20150721094627.GD21594@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <3C35EF0A-38EF-452A-AC9D-21805F4A45DB@gmail.com> To: Kimmo Paasiala X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 21:27:22 -0000 > 4 aug 2015 kl. 14:33 skrev Kimmo Paasiala : >=20 >> On Tue, Aug 4, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Michael Gr=C3=BCnewald wrote: >>=20 >>> On 21 Jul 2015, at 11:46, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>> - Impossible to have tools from both old and new version at the same tim= e (which >>> is necessary to upgrade db and prepare upgrades of db) =E2=80=A6 >>=20 >> Could not jails be used to solve these issues by running the two (=E2=80=A6= ) required versions >> in jailed environments? There is a little bit of setup, but if by any ch= ance you >> are using some variation of the immutable server pattern, it should stay v= ery low. >=20 > You can't ask an average FreeBSD user who just wants to upgrade > his/her PostgreSQL installation to set up jails that would be only > used for one task. The upgrade should be achievable with just 'pkg > upgrade' without any extra work. >=20 > -Kimmo True. Also, pg_upgrade cannot operate using different jails. But for some ppl, jails if definitely a solution. The problem we're trying t= o solve is not that, though, it is when not using jails. Supporting pg_upgra= de is one of my main concerns, and also the ability to run several postgresq= l versions simultaneously for whatever reason.=20 Palle From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 4 21:30:01 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 713619B30A8 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 21:30:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from girgen@pingpong.net) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59A5F13BD for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 21:30:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from girgen@pingpong.net) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 58D889B30A7; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 21:30:01 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F9719B30A6 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 21:30:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from girgen@pingpong.net) Received: from mail.pingpong.net (mail.pingpong.net [79.136.116.202]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5DCA13BB; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 21:30:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from girgen@pingpong.net) Received: from [192.168.1.12] (athedsl-249434.home.otenet.gr [85.73.21.248]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.pingpong.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C1642B22D; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 23:29:55 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Proposal to fix postgresql package maintainance nightmare From: Palle Girgensohn X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (12H143) In-Reply-To: <20150804091128.GA31243@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 00:29:41 +0300 Cc: Shane Ambler , "pgsql@FreeBSD.org" , "ports@FreeBSD.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <21E04846-08C2-47FD-8AE7-1AEE47B9FDFA@pingpong.net> References: <20150721094627.GD21594@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <55AE327F.8040300@ShaneWare.Biz> <20150721120342.GG21594@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> <7239E352-D053-4EB5-8561-66924C031096@pingpong.net> <20150804091128.GA31243@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> To: Baptiste Daroussin X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 21:30:01 -0000 > 4 aug 2015 kl. 12:11 skrev Baptiste Daroussin : >=20 >> On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 10:54:03AM +0300, Palle Girgensohn wrote: >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >>>> 21 jul 2015 kl. 15:03 skrev Baptiste Daroussin : >>>>=20 >>>>> On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 09:22:31PM +0930, Shane Ambler wrote: >>>>> On 21/07/2015 19:16, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>>=20 >>>>> We do manage a bunch of postgresql servers on FreeBSD, and I really fi= nd the >>>>> current model of packages postgresql is a nightmare on FreeBSD. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Let's first start with the current issues. >>>>> - Impossible to have tools from both old and new version at the same t= ime (which >>>>> is necessary to upgrade db and prepare upgrades of db) >>>>> - Impossible to chose the version we want to run in production without= having to >>>>> rebuild the packages and the whole ports tree with a specific default= . >>>>> - Nightmare each time a new default version is set in the ports tree. >>>>=20 >>>> Sounds like a good plan, I am not a heavy postgresql user but I have >>>> set the default pg version in make.conf to prevent unexpected new >>>> versions going in during port updates when I didn't think of doing >>>> upgrade steps. >>>>=20 >>>>> Here is my proposal to fix that. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Having one single postgresql-client package always on the latest stabl= e version >>>>> (backward compability being very good) providing the client cli tools a= nd the >>>>> libraries (those libraries will be used for everything in the ports tr= ee >>>>> needing to talk to postgresql) >>>>>=20 >>>>> Have one full postgresql package per supported version upstream self i= nstalling >>>>> itself into let's say: /usr/local/postgresql94 and symlinks all the cl= ient tools >>>>> to /usr/local/bin suffixed by the version psql94 pg_bla94 etc. >>>>=20 >>>> Don't want to start a debate but thought I would mention as food for=20= >>>> thought -- >>>>=20 >>>> I'm not sure of any strong need to have more than one pg client version= >>>> available. The newer client can connect to any older server and I don't= >>>> know of any issues when an old client connects to a newer server. >>>=20 >>> That is why I propose only one client for regular users >>>>=20 >>>>> That way everything talk to pgsql will only depend on one postgresql-c= lient >>>>> packages that will smoothly be upgraded to newer versions. >>>>>=20 >>>>> All database administrators will have the ability to chose the product= ion >>>>> version they do want without having to worry about a default version. >>>>>=20 >>>>> They can install multiple version in parallel and deal with upgrade th= e way they >>>>> want having access to both versions of the tools of the same time. >>>>>=20 >>>>> Any opinion on that change? Any idea one how to make the upgrade path a= s >>>>> transparent as possible for current setup? (beside of course adding an= UPDATING >>>>> entry) >>>>=20 >>>> I think allowing multiple pg server versions is a good idea, this can >>>> prevent old binary versions being removed before the data update proces= s. >>>>=20 >>>> A new upgrade command could be added so we can do `service postgresql >>>> upgrade` which tests for existing paths, defines old and new dirs and >>>> runs pg_upgrade. >>>>=20 >>>> The rc script could either add a version postfix to the data dir path >>>> or test PG_VERSION content to decide if data gets moved to data-old so >>>> new versions being started won't see older version data. Lack of up to >>>> date data dirs can lead to "You need to perform an upgrade first." >>>> Different disk usage (filecount?) for old and new data dir can lead to >>>> "Have you upgraded your old data?" >>>>=20 >>>> I don't think an upgrade step could be added during a port build, it >>>> would have to be at server start in the rc script. I wouldn't add an >>>> automatic upgrade step unless it was enabled by the user. >>>=20 >>> 100% agree, at first I would not even propose an automatic upgrade mecha= nism I >>> find it too dangerous by design I would expect admins to do upgrade them= selves >>> preparing it etc. >>>=20 >>> By upgrade patch I was more thinking when a user will make pkg upgrade a= nd get >>> the new scheme I want everything to be safe and smooth (transparent) fro= m what I >>> already tested this is the case now, but hey maybe someone has figured o= ut >>> something that could be wrong. >>>=20 >>> Best regards, >>> Bapt >>=20 >> Hi, >>=20 >> Sorry for not joining the conversation earlier. Did anything more happen h= ere? >=20 > Don't worry I would not have pushed any big change like this without you > reviewing and validating first :) >>=20 >> I did some test work a few years ago to make it possible to have multiple= versions installed in parallel. My approach then was that of lib/pgsqlNN an= d symlinks for the default version, similar to how macports do it.=20 >>=20 >> Reading the discussion in this thread, one of the main goals would be to e= ase dependency management for ports depending on PostgreSQL. My previous app= roach would not really remedy that problem.=20 >>=20 >> Suggesting just one client install is not perfect either, since psql's in= ternal commands, \[a-zA-Z]+, are somewhat linked to the version on the serve= r. Though these commands rarely changes, it happens. >=20 > Yup that is what I figured out. >>=20 >> What is extremely stable, though, is libpq.so.5. And isn't that what most= ports depend upon? >>=20 >> So the best would perhaps be to separate postgresql-libpq that always use= s the latest version (?) and have postgresqlNN-(client|server|contrib) like n= ow, except that the client of course is stripped from libpq? >=20 > Yes that would do the trick. >=20 > I have been busy in other area, but that is still in my target. Fine with m= e if > you want to take over that job, I'll be happy to review/test it. Otherwise= I may > send you a patch when I have something working. >=20 > Best regards, > Bapt I won't be doing much work in August, but after that I may look into this ag= ain. If you have something working before September, you're welcome to send a= patch. If later, better check before you start working so we don't do doubl= e work. :-)= From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 4 21:40:38 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 728EC9B34C1 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 21:40:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [8.8.178.116]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx2.freebsd.org", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BE691AE1 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 21:40:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from hammer.pct.niksun.com (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0392D666AE; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 21:40:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: lang/tcc unusable To: Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" References: <1438633579.6572.13.camel@fbsd.es> <55BFD033.8070507@FreeBSD.org> <1438634467.7343.2.camel@fbsd.es> <55BFDCA0.8040006@FreeBSD.org> <1438638022.7343.7.camel@fbsd.es> <55BFEAAA.4070008@FreeBSD.org> <1438644237.7343.13.camel@fbsd.es> <55C005D7.3050103@FreeBSD.org> <1438700587.2911.4.camel@fbsd.es> From: Jung-uk Kim Message-ID: <55C13155.3070500@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 17:40:37 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1438700587.2911.4.camel@fbsd.es> Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------090003070306070906010801" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 21:40:38 -0000 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------090003070306070906010801 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 08/04/2015 11:03, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: > El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 20:22 -0400, Jung-uk Kim escribió: >> On 08/03/2015 19:23, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: >>> El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 18:26 -0400, Jung-uk Kim escribió: >>>> On 08/03/2015 17:40, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: >>>>> El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 17:26 -0400, Jung-uk Kim >>>>> escribió: >>>>>> On 08/03/2015 16:41, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: >>>>>>> El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 16:33 -0400, Jung-uk Kim >>>>>>> escribió: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi Jung-uk, > >>>>>>>> On 08/03/2015 16:26, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> Hi people, >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Recently I added amd64 support to TinyCC, but I >>>>>>>>> encounter the following problem trying to compile a >>>>>>>>> simple code. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> #include >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> int main(){ printf("hello, world!\n); return 0; } >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> % tcc -o hello hello.c In file included from >>>>>>>>> hello.c:1: /usr/include/stdio.h:63: error: ';' >>>>>>>>> expected (got "va_list") >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I guess that some change introduced in 'stdio.h' >>>>>>>>> causes this weird behaviour. Last time that TCC >>>>>>>>> worked fine was on FreeBSD 9.1 -RELEASE/i386. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Also I reported this problem in the tinycc-devel >>>>>>>>> mailing list [1] >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Any thoughts? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I haven't tried tcc but '"' is missing for the >>>>>>>> printf(). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Yes, it was a typo here :) >>>>>> >>>>>> It seems it's a known tcc bug: >>>>>> >>>>>> http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?30966 >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Is there something that we can do about it? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks for pointing me, jkim@ >>>> >>>> It seems there is no easy way to fix this problem without >>>> touching src tree, e.g., >>>> >>>> --- sys/x86/include/_types.h (revision 286256) +++ >>>> sys/x86/include/_types.h (working copy) @@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ >>>> */ #ifdef __GNUCLIKE_BUILTIN_VARARGS typedef >>>> __builtin_va_lis t __va_list; /* internally known to gcc */ >>>> -#elif defined(lint) +#elif defined(__TINYC__) || >>>> defined(lint) typedef char * __va_list; /* pretend */ #endif >>>> #if defined(__GNUC_VA_LIST_COMPATIBILITY) && >>>> !defined(__GNUC_VA_LIST) \ >>>> >>> >>> If you need doing some changes into the src tree. >> >> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/286265 >> > > That's OK! > >>> So, what do you recommend in such case? Would it be much >>> trouble add the necessary changes to run TCC again? >>> Furthermore, TinyCC developer has ignored this issue >>> completely. >> >> The only hack I see is defining __va_list as a macro from >> libtcc.c but it is ugly. >> > > Probably this should be discussed in the tinycc-devel ML. In the > meanwhile we can try your dirty hack :-) See the attached patch. Yes, it is ugly. ;-) Jung-uk Kim PS: I took the liberty of adding __LP64__ and __amd64__ while I am here. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVwTFQAAoJEHyflib82/FGHDEH/3CxYb3Y6oNN5kvy9IdmsdoA KePyBqhUrEh/Akgn+J6u5ZKG6j7sstVszZzi4Ri7Xb+rBSztwSPc+ChxeosOwvmn Ushii3EpblG8qvWuDvoLCJP8xmkhQ6NHHM/vcvYzG5w68YxCxc1yu60M5bioiAP/ B1hbWhA+sPmovEKeTXfV2spNRUQyKqy5OxGq1v7OVf7amgfoLMZ0Su04OKAXHX4o GXfUI/jcIBiGCYzFC+7yin/JJblN1gPmgRj3LXAWg++GDvF54hwm3jvSs8qrl8Lr hi7Qbz738wzHhkYoJ1U4jFqvtJNMAK/eSP0Sq52kCrhwDDGMpe/AyNZiQgc5koI= =IcGS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------090003070306070906010801 Content-Type: text/x-patch; name="tcc.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="tcc.diff" Index: lang/tcc/files/patch-configure =================================================================== --- lang/tcc/files/patch-configure (revision 0) +++ lang/tcc/files/patch-configure (working copy) @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +--- configure.orig 2013-02-15 14:24:00 UTC ++++ configure +@@ -45,6 +45,7 @@ tcc_crtprefix="" + tcc_elfinterp="" + tcc_lddir= + confvars= ++define_va_list="" + + cpu=`uname -m` + +@@ -332,6 +333,9 @@ if test -z "$cross_prefix" ; then + + fi + fi ++ if ! $cc -o $CONFTEST -c $source_path/va_list.c 2>/dev/null ; then ++ define_va_list="yes" ++ fi + else + # if cross compiling, cannot launch a program, so make a static guess + case $cpu in +@@ -483,6 +487,9 @@ if test "$have_selinux" = "yes" ; then + echo "#define HAVE_SELINUX" >> $TMPH + echo "HAVE_SELINUX=yes" >> config.mak + fi ++if test "$define_va_list" = "yes" ; then ++ echo "#define DEFINE_VA_LIST" >> $TMPH ++fi + + version=`head $source_path/VERSION` + echo "VERSION=$version" >>config.mak Property changes on: lang/tcc/files/patch-configure ___________________________________________________________________ Added: fbsd:nokeywords ## -0,0 +1 ## +yes \ No newline at end of property Added: svn:eol-style ## -0,0 +1 ## +native \ No newline at end of property Added: svn:mime-type ## -0,0 +1 ## +text/plain \ No newline at end of property Index: lang/tcc/files/patch-libtcc.c =================================================================== --- lang/tcc/files/patch-libtcc.c (revision 0) +++ lang/tcc/files/patch-libtcc.c (working copy) @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +--- libtcc.c.orig 2013-02-15 14:24:00 UTC ++++ libtcc.c +@@ -931,7 +931,11 @@ LIBTCCAPI TCCState *tcc_new(void) + tcc_define_symbol(s, "__i386", NULL); + tcc_define_symbol(s, "i386", NULL); + #elif defined(TCC_TARGET_X86_64) ++# if defined(__FreeBSD__) ++ tcc_define_symbol(s, "__amd64__", NULL); ++# endif + tcc_define_symbol(s, "__x86_64__", NULL); ++ tcc_define_symbol(s, "__LP64__", NULL); + #elif defined(TCC_TARGET_ARM) + tcc_define_symbol(s, "__ARM_ARCH_4__", NULL); + tcc_define_symbol(s, "__arm_elf__", NULL); +@@ -957,6 +961,13 @@ LIBTCCAPI TCCState *tcc_new(void) + tcc_define_symbol(s, "__linux", NULL); + # endif + # if defined(__FreeBSD__) ++# if defined(DEFINE_VA_LIST) ++# if defined(TCC_TARGET_X86_64) ++ tcc_define_symbol(s, "__va_list", "struct { long pad[3]; }"); ++# else ++ tcc_define_symbol(s, "__va_list", "char *"); ++# endif ++# endif + # define str(s) #s + tcc_define_symbol(s, "__FreeBSD__", str( __FreeBSD__)); + # undef str Property changes on: lang/tcc/files/patch-libtcc.c ___________________________________________________________________ Added: fbsd:nokeywords ## -0,0 +1 ## +yes \ No newline at end of property Added: svn:eol-style ## -0,0 +1 ## +native \ No newline at end of property Added: svn:mime-type ## -0,0 +1 ## +text/plain \ No newline at end of property Index: lang/tcc/files/patch-va__list.c =================================================================== --- lang/tcc/files/patch-va__list.c (revision 0) +++ lang/tcc/files/patch-va__list.c (working copy) @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +--- va_list.c.orig 2015-08-04 21:20:18 UTC ++++ va_list.c +@@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ ++#ifdef __FreeBSD__ ++#undef __GNUC__ ++#undef __GNUC_MINOR__ ++#include ++void foo(__va_list); ++#endif Property changes on: lang/tcc/files/patch-va__list.c ___________________________________________________________________ Added: fbsd:nokeywords ## -0,0 +1 ## +yes \ No newline at end of property Added: svn:eol-style ## -0,0 +1 ## +native \ No newline at end of property Added: svn:mime-type ## -0,0 +1 ## +text/plain \ No newline at end of property --------------090003070306070906010801-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 4 22:22:51 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 702FD9B3D58 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 22:22:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpm@fbsd.es) Received: from imap2-2.ox.privateemail.com (imap2-2.ox.privateemail.com [192.64.116.207]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "privateemail.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4534EE0A; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 22:22:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpm@fbsd.es) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by imap2.ox.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 436AC8C0082; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 18:22:48 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at imap2.ox.privateemail.com Received: from imap2.ox.privateemail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (imap2.ox.privateemail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id r9nvWWid3vhe; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 18:22:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from daemonlab (120.Red-83-58-115.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [83.58.115.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.ox.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 787188C0069; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 18:22:45 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1438726953.17293.9.camel@fbsd.es> Subject: Re: lang/tcc unusable From: Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina To: Jung-uk Kim , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 00:22:33 +0200 In-Reply-To: <55C13155.3070500@FreeBSD.org> References: <1438633579.6572.13.camel@fbsd.es> <55BFD033.8070507@FreeBSD.org> <1438634467.7343.2.camel@fbsd.es> <55BFDCA0.8040006@FreeBSD.org> <1438638022.7343.7.camel@fbsd.es> <55BFEAAA.4070008@FreeBSD.org> <1438644237.7343.13.camel@fbsd.es> <55C005D7.3050103@FreeBSD.org> <1438700587.2911.4.camel@fbsd.es> <55C13155.3070500@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-PkiWg5pbHnq1jx9NNEOX" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.4 (3.16.4-2.fc22) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 22:22:51 -0000 --=-PkiWg5pbHnq1jx9NNEOX Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El mar, 04-08-2015 a las 17:40 -0400, Jung-uk Kim escribi=C3=B3: > On 08/04/2015 11:03, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: > > El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 20:22 -0400, Jung-uk Kim escribi=C3=B3: > > > On 08/03/2015 19:23, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: > > > > El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 18:26 -0400, Jung-uk Kim escribi=C3=B3: > > > > > On 08/03/2015 17:40, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: > > > > > > El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 17:26 -0400, Jung-uk Kim > > > > > > escribi=C3=B3: > > > > > > > On 08/03/2015 16:41, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: > > > > > > > > El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 16:33 -0400, Jung-uk Kim=20 > > > > > > > > escribi=C3=B3: > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > Hi Jung-uk, > >=20 > > > > > > > > > On 08/03/2015 16:26, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Hi people, > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > Recently I added amd64 support to TinyCC, but I=20 > > > > > > > > > > encounter the following problem trying to compile a > > > > > > > > > > simple code. > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > #include > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > int main(){ printf("hello, world!\n); return 0; } > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > % tcc -o hello hello.c In file included from=20 > > > > > > > > > > hello.c:1: /usr/include/stdio.h:63: error: ';' > > > > > > > > > > expected (got "va_list") > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > I guess that some change introduced in 'stdio.h' > > > > > > > > > > causes this weird behaviour. Last time that TCC > > > > > > > > > > worked fine was on FreeBSD 9.1 -RELEASE/i386. > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > Also I reported this problem in the tinycc-devel=20 > > > > > > > > > > mailing list [1] > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > I haven't tried tcc but '"' is missing for the > > > > > > > > > printf(). > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > Yes, it was a typo here :) > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > It seems it's a known tcc bug: > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?30966 > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > Is there something that we can do about it? > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > Thanks for pointing me, jkim@ > > > > >=20 > > > > > It seems there is no easy way to fix this problem without=20 > > > > > touching src tree, e.g., > > > > >=20 > > > > > --- sys/x86/include/_types.h (revision 286256) +++=20 > > > > > sys/x86/include/_types.h (working copy) @@ -152,7=20 > > > > > +152,7 @@ > > > > > */ #ifdef __GNUCLIKE_BUILTIN_VARARGS typedef > > > > > __builtin_va_lis t __va_list; /* internally known to=20 > > > > > gcc */ > > > > > -#elif defined(lint) +#elif defined(__TINYC__) || > > > > > defined(lint) typedef char * __va_list; /*=20 > > > > > pretend */ #endif > > > > > #if defined(__GNUC_VA_LIST_COMPATIBILITY) &&=20 > > > > > !defined(__GNUC_VA_LIST) \ > > > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > > > If you need doing some changes into the src tree. > > >=20 > > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/286265 > > >=20 > >=20 > > That's OK! > >=20 > > > > So, what do you recommend in such case? Would it be much > > > > trouble add the necessary changes to run TCC again? > > > > Furthermore, TinyCC developer has ignored this issue > > > > completely. > > >=20 > > > The only hack I see is defining __va_list as a macro from > > > libtcc.c but it is ugly. > > >=20 > >=20 > > Probably this should be discussed in the tinycc-devel ML. In the=20 > > meanwhile we can try your dirty hack :-) >=20 > See the attached patch. Yes, it is ugly. ;-) It works :) If I compile some c file it generates a coredump (Bus error)=20 /* traditional way */ % tcc -o hello hello.c % ./hello Bus error (core dumped) Although, it works using '-run' option % tcc -run hello.c hello, world! Best regards,--=20 Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina PGP fingerprint =3D C60E 9497 5302 793B CC2D BB89 A1F3 5D66 E6D0 5453 --=-PkiWg5pbHnq1jx9NNEOX Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAABCAAGBQJVwTspAAoJEKHzXWbm0FRTh74H/2srzZejWGuiT7L1yF+frhwk 9SZp7wwX0d5yEVqkHtJBiEfiJe3MIw8a53PsF/vXApI1Ka3hA0i3b2fhyvZG0bo3 ugav0X3H7sMJW+BRs4t5RPfm9BJRKKxHdiUyBZRsFdcrkiteQuo67Bt1PHkeA8TU AfJAtLvPHjfWxWMriICFWQU6cAikjQec6QBj/JnLFb1HgtV+UpZC9jOGeS7CDraO /pFeWCBLdcy3USdi6aOTUiJbG70FQk29fsvYiNcpej1hQAcaSok6NV2gQlmPC5+O L5eBWvPIyxl7dvGDIdoBR1DhG+vKuKCN6eEQmuFejWPwkUQhg21cpX9dt/eBMgs= =xgO5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-PkiWg5pbHnq1jx9NNEOX-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 4 22:46:30 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF31F9B3229 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 22:46:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx2.freebsd.org", Issuer "Gandi Standard SSL CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98490827 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 22:46:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from hammer.pct.niksun.com (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4179026BE; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 22:46:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jkim@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: lang/tcc unusable To: Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" References: <1438633579.6572.13.camel@fbsd.es> <55BFD033.8070507@FreeBSD.org> <1438634467.7343.2.camel@fbsd.es> <55BFDCA0.8040006@FreeBSD.org> <1438638022.7343.7.camel@fbsd.es> <55BFEAAA.4070008@FreeBSD.org> <1438644237.7343.13.camel@fbsd.es> <55C005D7.3050103@FreeBSD.org> <1438700587.2911.4.camel@fbsd.es> <55C13155.3070500@FreeBSD.org> <1438726953.17293.9.camel@fbsd.es> From: Jung-uk Kim Message-ID: <55C140C5.1010404@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 4 Aug 2015 18:46:29 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1438726953.17293.9.camel@fbsd.es> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 22:46:30 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 08/04/2015 18:22, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: > El mar, 04-08-2015 a las 17:40 -0400, Jung-uk Kim escribió: >> On 08/04/2015 11:03, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: >>> El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 20:22 -0400, Jung-uk Kim escribió: >>>> On 08/03/2015 19:23, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: >>>>> El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 18:26 -0400, Jung-uk Kim >>>>> escribió: >>>>>> On 08/03/2015 17:40, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: >>>>>>> El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 17:26 -0400, Jung-uk Kim >>>>>>> escribió: >>>>>>>> On 08/03/2015 16:41, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 16:33 -0400, Jung-uk Kim >>>>>>>>> escribió: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi Jung-uk, >>> >>>>>>>>>> On 08/03/2015 16:26, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina >>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> Hi people, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Recently I added amd64 support to TinyCC, but I >>>>>>>>>>> encounter the following problem trying to >>>>>>>>>>> compile a simple code. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> #include >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> int main(){ printf("hello, world!\n); return 0; >>>>>>>>>>> } >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> % tcc -o hello hello.c In file included from >>>>>>>>>>> hello.c:1: /usr/include/stdio.h:63: error: ';' >>>>>>>>>>> expected (got "va_list") >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I guess that some change introduced in >>>>>>>>>>> 'stdio.h' causes this weird behaviour. Last >>>>>>>>>>> time that TCC worked fine was on FreeBSD 9.1 >>>>>>>>>>> -RELEASE/i386. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Also I reported this problem in the >>>>>>>>>>> tinycc-devel mailing list [1] >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Any thoughts? >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> I haven't tried tcc but '"' is missing for the >>>>>>>>>> printf(). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Yes, it was a typo here :) >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> It seems it's a known tcc bug: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?30966 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Is there something that we can do about it? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for pointing me, jkim@ >>>>>> >>>>>> It seems there is no easy way to fix this problem without >>>>>> touching src tree, e.g., >>>>>> >>>>>> --- sys/x86/include/_types.h (revision 286256) +++ >>>>>> sys/x86/include/_types.h (working copy) @@ -152,7 +152,7 >>>>>> @@ */ #ifdef __GNUCLIKE_BUILTIN_VARARGS typedef >>>>>> __builtin_va_lis t __va_list; /* internally known to gcc >>>>>> */ -#elif defined(lint) +#elif defined(__TINYC__) || >>>>>> defined(lint) typedef char * __va_list; /* pretend */ >>>>>> #endif #if defined(__GNUC_VA_LIST_COMPATIBILITY) && >>>>>> !defined(__GNUC_VA_LIST) \ >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> If you need doing some changes into the src tree. >>>> >>>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/286265 >>>> >>> >>> That's OK! >>> >>>>> So, what do you recommend in such case? Would it be much >>>>> trouble add the necessary changes to run TCC again? >>>>> Furthermore, TinyCC developer has ignored this issue >>>>> completely. >>>> >>>> The only hack I see is defining __va_list as a macro from >>>> libtcc.c but it is ugly. >>>> >>> >>> Probably this should be discussed in the tinycc-devel ML. In >>> the meanwhile we can try your dirty hack :-) >> >> See the attached patch. Yes, it is ugly. ;-) > > It works :) > > If I compile some c file it generates a coredump (Bus error) > > /* traditional way */ > > % tcc -o hello hello.c % ./hello Bus error (core dumped) > > Although, it works using '-run' option > > % tcc -run hello.c hello, world! Yes, I saw that, too. % cat hello.c #include int main(void) { printf("Hello, world!\n"); return (0); } % tcc -c hello.c % tcc -o hello hello.o % ./hello Bus error (core dumped) % cc -o hello hello.o % ./hello Hello, world! In other words, tcc can compile but linking is broken, I guess. Jung-uk Kim -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVwUC/AAoJEHyflib82/FGJHkH/3Pi3cKj3nSZD6iNg4T0JY2/ BIo0FM2kkKbzdcKJfpYd8kxwqb3zeEkyL9Bq6JAHNkQo7ehPjBTgJHb7hMr8uyYa VCXhSjJI/jTFsSuey6000XA6Rj6q6oPB22L9Ojgdca+dN0RShNeUTcuT6lB637uj TyPjkBFvOGBNEZti+/uJmmOlwn3d/xB1j9voYaq1oIXwUb7Zof178aBvWGdPCPNu owBuPJ/dYodh5j4hWpxOsQspeRWJkRMa1i9FGg/rByb6dR4YL5Go/7RciCc5AXn7 hbRUwKvnyZihUnE0AHqBWndgLdYkP8OHYprBVqD0Zdj5YR+gqA4lXsthR9vOi2w= =nFtd -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Aug 4 23:04:04 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A4009B36A3 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 23:04:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpm@fbsd.es) Received: from imap11-3.ox.privateemail.com (imap11-3.ox.privateemail.com [198.187.29.245]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "privateemail.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E674F6B; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 23:04:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpm@fbsd.es) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by imap11.ox.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B68A8800F2; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 19:03:57 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at imap11.ox.privateemail.com Received: from imap11.ox.privateemail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (imap11.ox.privateemail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id g1TEs1C_7iBv; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 19:03:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from daemonlab (120.Red-83-58-115.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [83.58.115.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by imap11.ox.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 983058800E5; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 19:03:56 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1438729431.17293.13.camel@fbsd.es> Subject: Re: lang/tcc unusable From: Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina To: Jung-uk Kim , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 01:03:51 +0200 In-Reply-To: <55C140C5.1010404@FreeBSD.org> References: <1438633579.6572.13.camel@fbsd.es> <55BFD033.8070507@FreeBSD.org> <1438634467.7343.2.camel@fbsd.es> <55BFDCA0.8040006@FreeBSD.org> <1438638022.7343.7.camel@fbsd.es> <55BFEAAA.4070008@FreeBSD.org> <1438644237.7343.13.camel@fbsd.es> <55C005D7.3050103@FreeBSD.org> <1438700587.2911.4.camel@fbsd.es> <55C13155.3070500@FreeBSD.org> <1438726953.17293.9.camel@fbsd.es> <55C140C5.1010404@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-LffhXOm94KK6Q57nfmnl" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.4 (3.16.4-2.fc22) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 23:04:04 -0000 --=-LffhXOm94KK6Q57nfmnl Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El mar, 04-08-2015 a las 18:46 -0400, Jung-uk Kim escribi=C3=B3: > On 08/04/2015 18:22, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: > > > El mar, 04-08-2015 a las 17:40 -0400, Jung-uk Kim escribi=C3=B3:On= =20 > > > 08/04/2015 11:03, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: > > > > El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 20:22 -0400, Jung-uk Kim escribi=C3=B3: > > > > > On 08/03/2015 19:23, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: > > > > > > El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 18:26 -0400, Jung-uk Kim > > > > > > escribi=C3=B3: > > > > > > > On 08/03/2015 17:40, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina wrote: > > > > > > > > El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 17:26 -0400, Jung-uk Kim=20 > > > > > > > > escribi=C3=B3: > > > > > > > > > On 08/03/2015 16:41, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > El lun, 03-08-2015 a las 16:33 -0400, Jung-uk Kim=20 > > > > > > > > > > escribi=C3=B3: > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > Hi Jung-uk, > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > > On 08/03/2015 16:26, Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina=20 > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi people, > > > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > > > Recently I added amd64 support to TinyCC, but I > > > > > > > > > > > > encounter the following problem trying to > > > > > > > > > > > > compile a simple code. > > > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > > > #include > > > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > > > int main(){ printf("hello, world!\n); return 0; > > > > > > > > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > > > % tcc -o hello hello.c In file included from=20 > > > > > > > > > > > > hello.c:1: /usr/include/stdio.h:63: error: ';'=20 > > > > > > > > > > > > expected (got "va_list") > > > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > > > I guess that some change introduced in > > > > > > > > > > > > 'stdio.h' causes this weird behaviour. Last > > > > > > > > > > > > time that TCC worked fine was on FreeBSD 9.1 > > > > > > > > > > > > -RELEASE/i386. > > > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > > > Also I reported this problem in the > > > > > > > > > > > > tinycc-devel mailing list [1] > > > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > > > Any thoughts? > > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > > I haven't tried tcc but '"' is missing for the=20 > > > > > > > > > > > printf(). > > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > > Yes, it was a typo here :) > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > It seems it's a known tcc bug: > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > > http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?30966 > > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > Is there something that we can do about it? > > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > > Thanks for pointing me, jkim@ > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > It seems there is no easy way to fix this problem without > > > > > > > touching src tree, e.g., > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > > --- sys/x86/include/_types.h (revision 286256) +++=20 > > > > > > > sys/x86/include/_types.h (working copy) @@ -152,7=20 > > > > > > > +152,7 > > > > > > > @@ */ #ifdef __GNUCLIKE_BUILTIN_VARARGS typedef=20 > > > > > > > __builtin_va_lis t __va_list; /* internally known=20 > > > > > > > to gcc > > > > > > > */ -#elif defined(lint) +#elif defined(__TINYC__) ||=20 > > > > > > > defined(lint) typedef char * __va_list; /*=20 > > > > > > > pretend */ > > > > > > > #endif #if defined(__GNUC_VA_LIST_COMPATIBILITY) &&=20 > > > > > > > !defined(__GNUC_VA_LIST) \ > > > > > > >=20 > > > > > >=20 > > > > > > If you need doing some changes into the src tree. > > > > >=20 > > > > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/286265 > > > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > > > That's OK! > > > >=20 > > > > > > So, what do you recommend in such case? Would it be much=20 > > > > > > trouble add the necessary changes to run TCC again?=20 > > > > > > Furthermore, TinyCC developer has ignored this issue=20 > > > > > > completely. > > > > >=20 > > > > > The only hack I see is defining __va_list as a macro from=20 > > > > > libtcc.c but it is ugly. > > > > >=20 > > > >=20 > > > > Probably this should be discussed in the tinycc-devel ML. In > > > > the meanwhile we can try your dirty hack :-) > > >=20 > > > See the attached patch. Yes, it is ugly. ;-) > >=20 > > It works :) > >=20 > > If I compile some c file it generates a coredump (Bus error) > >=20 > > /* traditional way */ > >=20 > > % tcc -o hello hello.c % ./hello Bus error (core dumped) > >=20 > > Although, it works using '-run' option > >=20 > > % tcc -run hello.c hello, world! >=20 > Yes, I saw that, too. >=20 > % cat hello.c > #include >=20 > int > main(void) > { >=20 > printf("Hello, world!\n"); > return (0); > } > % tcc -c hello.c > % tcc -o hello hello.o > % ./hello > Bus error (core dumped) > % cc -o hello hello.o > % ./hello > Hello, world! >=20 > In other words, tcc can compile but linking is broken, I guess. Exact! This seems to be a link-related problem, because `tcc -c hello.c' produces a working hello.o file, which can be (for testing purposes) linked with gcc, and which results in a correctly running executable. I'm investigating this further... --=20 Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina PGP fingerprint =3D C60E 9497 5302 793B CC2D BB89 A1F3 5D66 E6D0 5453 --=-LffhXOm94KK6Q57nfmnl Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAABCAAGBQJVwUTXAAoJEKHzXWbm0FRTyrYIAIXpIzSGswS7VByCSyByJ9BK swQ6qLQ67fpoGjduvXdpMW7bLKxpaI2lnnjEY8Zq6FFEO5VFlARAxhh/hc1f2M++ 2U3rVnR/kNZUJ2Gl4o2/WBvnveBruHrFGxc2Cr7yHf5aRh62zphmqv6BkWb8YUer O9BOaNIuuuhZYfpCnkYD/bb0Pw2TzfM4hLve3HoK7LY8pQyMhX/A7EdvmIGYdPcz 1rdXqq/ElwqUO2NOxLC0fvYFm+6Q7RujjFQFgOvzbYe+2P0+xyeEprUGp6vArNxt iqtXus3rktKQ2SdFqRiPgHG6MpeSax0Jp8B5SAHA95jzE2U6SYv9NCmvdFpYj5A= =w2tF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-LffhXOm94KK6Q57nfmnl-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 5 06:15:39 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B73A29B4A4E for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 06:15:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7BC551F6C for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 06:15:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from [89.204.135.10] (helo=localhost.unixarea.de) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1ZMrz8-0000uI-B1; Wed, 05 Aug 2015 08:15:30 +0200 Received: from localhost.my.domain (c720-r276659 [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.unixarea.de (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t756FT87015879 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 5 Aug 2015 08:15:29 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t756FTQ8015878; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 08:15:29 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 08:15:29 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: broken strings compiled-in into mutt Message-ID: <20150805061529.GA15864@c720-r276659> Reply-To: Matthias Apitz Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT r269739 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 89.204.135.10 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 06:15:39 -0000 El día Tuesday, August 04, 2015 a las 09:48:24PM +0200, Kurt Jaeger escribió: > Hi! > > > Hello Udo (as maintainer), > > > > Maybe it's a FreeBSD issue, rather than a mutt one? > > I see similar effects on 10.1-amd64. > > Mutt 1.5.23 (2014-03-12) > Copyright (C) 1996-2009 Michael R. Elkins and others. > Mutt comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `mutt -vv'. > Mutt is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it > under certain conditions; type `mutt -vv' for details. > > System: FreeBSD 10.2-RC2 (amd64) > ncurses: ncurses 5.7.20081102 (compiled with 5.7) > libiconv: 1.14 > libidn: 1.31 (compiled with 1.29) > > Compiler: > F > eeBSD clang ve > ... Hello, I digged into this and the reason is in the source tree of mutt itself. The option (...) strings get punched into a file conststrings.c and if you build mutt with 'make' it gives an error due to a gmake'ish construct in the Makefile / Makefile.in: # make conststrings.c cc -I/usr/local/include -o txt2c cc: error: no input files *** Error code 1 (ignored) ( cc -I/usr/local/include -v || cc -I/usr/local/include --version || cc -I/usr/local/include -V || echo "unknown compiler"; ) 2>&1 | ./txt2c.sh cc_version >conststrings_c echo "-pipe -DLIBICONV_PLUG -g -fno-strict-aliasing" | ./txt2c.sh cc_cflags >>conststrings_c grep ac_cs_config= config.status | cut -d= -f2- | sed -e 's/^"//' -e 's/"$//' | ./txt2c.sh configure_options >>conststrings_c mv -f conststrings_c conststrings.c i.e. because it can not build txt2c from txt2c.c it falles back to use some shell script txt2c.sh; this, in turn, has another error: it contains a sed pipeline and among others it does (here as an example with some string): $ echo "FreeBSD is the better system" | sed -e 's/\t/\\t/'g -e 's/\r/\\r/g' F\reeBSD is \the be\t\te\r sys\tem The workaround is to make mutt with gmake (the default on Linux); The bugs should be fixed im mutt, ofc. matthias -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ guru@unixarea.de, http://www.unixarea.de/ ☎ +49-176-38902045 No! Nein! ¡No! Όχι! -- Ευχαριστούμε! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 5 10:05:35 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0A0E9B2F83 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 10:05:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B08D930 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 10:05:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 89E7C9B2F82; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 10:05:35 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 898EE9B2F81 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 10:05:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B20E92F for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 10:05:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t75A5ZxC047395 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 10:05:35 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id t75A5ZXc047394; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 10:05:35 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201508051005.t75A5ZXc047394@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 10:05:35 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 10:05:35 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ german/wordpress | 4.2.3 | 4.2.4 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 5 10:51:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 337379B3C62 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 10:51:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from slim.berklix.org (slim.berklix.org [94.185.90.68]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD019135A; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 10:51:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from mart.js.berklix.net (p5B2272CF.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [91.34.114.207]) (authenticated bits=128) by slim.berklix.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t75At4f9027267; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 12:55:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (fire.js.berklix.net [192.168.91.41]) by mart.js.berklix.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id t75ApoE6059441; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 12:51:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Received: from fire.js.berklix.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by fire.js.berklix.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id t75Apc7X032698; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 12:51:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from jhs@berklix.com) Message-Id: <201508051051.t75Apc7X032698@fire.js.berklix.net> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org cc: Matthew Seaman Subject: Re: Self committing... allowed or not? From: "Julian H. Stacey" Organization: http://berklix.com BSD Unix Linux Consultants, Munich Germany User-agent: EXMH on FreeBSD http://berklix.com/free/ X-URL: http://www.berklix.com In-reply-to: Your message "Tue, 04 Aug 2015 18:02:36 +0100." <55C0F02C.1020707@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 12:51:38 +0200 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 10:51:59 -0000 Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 04/08/2015 17:28, Loganaden Velvindron wrote: > > I would like to know how hard would it be for our FreeBSD experts to > > hack SVN to allow port maintainers commit to individual ports to speed > > up the process :p ? > > Technically that's probably not too difficult. Debian has a system like > that, using PGP signatures for authentication, which we could probably > steal^Wcopy without too much trouble. > > The real kicker though is about maintaining code quality. This is > pretty much why committers exist: they are people who have shown > competence in dealing with src / ports / docs whatever and have > demonstrated they can maintain standards. One of a committers primary > functions is to either fix or get the submitter to fix problems with > submissions before committing. > > Now, it's almost certainly true that many port maintainers who aren't > already committers would be perfectly competent at updating their own > ports. Chances are though if such a maintainer has been sufficiently > active and has submitted enough to establish their competence then > they'd be a definite prospect as a full-blown committer anyhow. ie. if > you're good enough to commit changes to your own ports, then you're > pretty much good enough to commit changes to any port, so you might as > well have a ports commit bit. Number of commiters ? I vaguely recall about 300 or 400 ? { http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributors/staff-committers.html Contains one friend who said he'd resigned his commit bit. So maybe list out of date. https://wiki.freebsd.org/BecomingACommitter http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/committers-guide/committer.types.html A quick skim shows no number } Number of Ports Maintainers: 1567 { cd /pub/FreeBSD/branches/-current/ports find . -type f -name Makefile | xargs grep MAINTAINER > /tmp/ports_named find . -type f -name Makefile | xargs grep -h MAINTAINER > /tmp/ports_unnamed wc -l po* 24295 ports_named 24295 ports_unnamed sort ports_unnamed| uniq | grep @ ... a spot of vi trimming of spaces tabs & ?= & = to reduce variance & allow uniq to strip more ... A few of those addresses will be @freebsd list names, & some people@freebsd } Cheers, Julian -- Julian Stacey, BSD Linux Unix C Sys Eng Consultant Munich http://berklix.com Reply after previous text, like a play - Not before, which looses context. Indent previous text with "> " Insert new lines before 80 chars. Send plain text, Not quoted-printable, Not HTML, Not ms.doc, Not base64. Subsidise contraception V. Global warming, pollution, famine, migration. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 5 11:37:15 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 912EA9B389B for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 11:37:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 19A1DE0D for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 11:37:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@freebsd.org) Received: from ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com (no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id t75BaueI047572 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 5 Aug 2015 12:37:07 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@freebsd.org) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=freebsd.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk t75BaueI047572 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/t75BaueI047572; dkim=none reason="no signature"; dkim-adsp=none; dkim-atps=neutral X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged) claimed to be ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com Subject: Re: Self committing... allowed or not? To: "Julian H. Stacey" , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <201508051051.t75Apc7X032698@fire.js.berklix.net> From: Matthew Seaman X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <55C1F551.3020905@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 12:36:49 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201508051051.t75Apc7X032698@fire.js.berklix.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WAe5gkDoG8rf5DUPwIrFMdG0K0jgiIF2r" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 11:37:15 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --WAe5gkDoG8rf5DUPwIrFMdG0K0jgiIF2r Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 08/05/15 11:51, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > Matthew Seaman wrote: >> On 04/08/2015 17:28, Loganaden Velvindron wrote: >>> I would like to know how hard would it be for our FreeBSD experts to >>> hack SVN to allow port maintainers commit to individual ports to spee= d >>> up the process :p ? >> >> Technically that's probably not too difficult. Debian has a system li= ke >> that, using PGP signatures for authentication, which we could probably= >> steal^Wcopy without too much trouble. >> >> The real kicker though is about maintaining code quality. This is >> pretty much why committers exist: they are people who have shown >> competence in dealing with src / ports / docs whatever and have >> demonstrated they can maintain standards. One of a committers primary= >> functions is to either fix or get the submitter to fix problems with >> submissions before committing. >> >> Now, it's almost certainly true that many port maintainers who aren't >> already committers would be perfectly competent at updating their own >> ports. Chances are though if such a maintainer has been sufficiently >> active and has submitted enough to establish their competence then >> they'd be a definite prospect as a full-blown committer anyhow. ie. if= >> you're good enough to commit changes to your own ports, then you're >> pretty much good enough to commit changes to any port, so you might as= >> well have a ports commit bit. >=20 > Number of commiters ? I vaguely recall about 300 or 400 ? > { > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributors/staf= f-committers.html > Contains one friend who said he'd resigned his commit bit. > So maybe list out of date. > https://wiki.freebsd.org/BecomingACommitter > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/articles/committers-guide/committer.typ= es.html > A quick skim shows no number > } https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/svnadmin/conf/access?revision=3D393512&v= iew=3Dmarkup Shows currently there are 281 ports committers > Number of Ports Maintainers: 1567 > { > cd /pub/FreeBSD/branches/-current/ports > find . -type f -name Makefile | xargs grep MAINTAINER > /tmp/ports_na= med > find . -type f -name Makefile | xargs grep -h MAINTAINER > /tmp/ports= _unnamed > wc -l po* > 24295 ports_named > 24295 ports_unnamed > sort ports_unnamed| uniq | grep @ ... a spot of vi trimming of space= s tabs > & ?=3D & =3D to reduce variance & allow uniq to strip more ... > A few of those addresses will be @freebsd list names, & some people@f= reebsd > } Yeah. Requests to set up 1500 new @FreeBSD.org accounts with SVN access would certainly not make anyone popular with the accounts@... team. It is going to be a royal PITA to keep that list up to date as maintainers come and go, and as they change which ports they maintain and would certainly result in a great deal of churn and extra complexity in svnadmin/conf/. I believe the way the Debian system works is that a correctly PGP signed and formatted update message will be auto-committed by a bot, so the administrative load for handling a setup where a port maintainer can 'commit' changes to their own ports consists of curating a gnupg keyring with the approved maintainer keys and a bit of scripting to correlate the allowed keys with the maintainer address and checking that they are the maintainer for the port in question. (Or we could just have a MAINTAINER_KEYS=3D0xcafebabefeedface variable listing the allowed PGP keys directly in the port Makefile.) Sure it's technically feasible, but unclear as to whether it's worth the effort to set up or what benefits it would achieve in practice. Cheers Matthew --WAe5gkDoG8rf5DUPwIrFMdG0K0jgiIF2r Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVwfVYAAoJEABRPxDgqeTnOPUP/1LSfdKdC1pOz6Lu9QCpTEVy LNFSLoiihp9haDURKy3I4321w7Tao15JPIC64isUr7DSmDcOSwBKnrDiDqc2Fjno SNW1dQQ9n2oHpeHeiQJycul9+x+OOglqWFWbqN504fR/98b7BxVf9vP5NJ2J/Jww EhLQwE4NpJtrf6/LbH14nnafdKTeRDkdGdy0cezXHZuo9vwGK8nwZ6xHQ/dsXeix 4vrD+/MEaRsQkG9NFK4DaPl+FkBygk5EUMOQZODZKamP/enk3CkN1OLUEP0sb+GO yovjno91o2dEtER7d27qIjHKUpVvcy3FEG970nvAMd0XmxyeEqDhdMgwo8YGbeRP ehyFQuWjBx0qBubedFNZLXd/RaB8JybF9O9JT0JQbniLbH7KDg2R9rm6XSUTwotA 9jyINUVcQATb4vZIRvz3ldmT17tqcbqZhC7Zk4rK7UCbnVPsbh/35k2497LbcCxa xRp+os93BFlh7JlRJubtCZxeAhZCKgrLCIL+uh46MUqgo1KEjSdsdNCSkeTXsRP8 5dsRsbR6OMb0aaixhubXf1OLQU5hGkc2FyvEYU/yFRZEmn1SU/vArgGI8fzU0YME MLmvtrfs+pOPAwUp2sMpKIxaH9SnpnYdwB9yZiluW2Q7+LZu8T0APZqU5BA6Zkyo ULqsXS70F48eDfgdzoGR =guuM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WAe5gkDoG8rf5DUPwIrFMdG0K0jgiIF2r-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 5 12:51:33 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F8799B4198 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 12:51:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@shaneware.biz) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F51853 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 12:51:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@shaneware.biz) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 1332E9B4197; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 12:51:33 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ECF089B4196 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 12:51:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@shaneware.biz) Received: from ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net (ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net [150.101.137.145]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A04E852; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 12:51:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from FreeBSD@shaneware.biz) Received: from ppp121-45-10-212.lns20.adl2.internode.on.net (HELO leader.local) ([121.45.10.212]) by ipmail06.adl6.internode.on.net with ESMTP; 05 Aug 2015 22:21:30 +0930 Message-ID: <55C206CE.2070904@ShaneWare.Biz> Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 22:21:26 +0930 From: Shane Ambler User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Brooks Davis CC: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does OpenMP (iomp5) work for clang-devel? References: <1437439738.57135.5.camel@pki2.com> <20150721010727.GA64147@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> <1437442196.57135.13.camel@pki2.com> <55AE0474.5050207@ShaneWare.Biz> In-Reply-To: <55AE0474.5050207@ShaneWare.Biz> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 12:51:33 -0000 On 21/07/2015 18:06, Shane Ambler wrote: > On 21/07/2015 10:59, Dennis Glatting wrote: >> On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 01:07 +0000, Brooks Davis wrote: >>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 05:48:58PM -0700, Dennis Glatting wrote: >>>> I can't seem to get this working and it appears not to emit code. I >>>> have >>>> libiomp5 installed and I compile specifying: >>>> >>>> clang++-devel -fopenmp=libiomp5 ... >>>> >>>> And the compiler says: >>>> >>>> clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: >>>> '-fopenmp=libiomp5' > > That should be just -fopenmp > > From http://blog.llvm.org/2015/05/openmp-support_22.html > > To enable OpenMP, just add ‘-fopenmp’ to the command line and provide > paths to OpenMP headers and library with ‘-I -L OpenMP library path>’. Having just installed devel/llvm37 and done a few tests, this doesn't appear to happen, for a single file test I also need to add -lomp clang37 -fopenmp -I/usr/local/llvm37/include -L/usr/local/llvm37/lib -lomp omp.c -o omp-test One issue is that lldb breaks qtcreator. Sounds odd but I get - [leader:~] shane% qtcreator QProcess: Destroyed while process ("/usr/local/bin/lldb-mi-devel") is still running. QProcess: Destroyed while process ("/usr/local/bin/lldb-mi37") is still running. Broken pipe [leader:~] shane% If I rename the two binaries reported qtcreator runs fine. qtcreator-3.4.0 - rebuilt while llvm37 was installed without change. My main interest in openmp is for compiling graphics/blender. This breaks llvm37 - I am running 10-stable - FreeBSD leader.local 10.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 10.2-PRERELEASE #16 r285937: Tue Jul 28 20:58:13 ACST 2015 root@leader.local:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 % pkg info -ox llvm37 llvm37-3.7.0.r1 devel/llvm37 Adding to make.conf - .if ${.CURDIR:M*/graphics/blender*} CC=clang37 CXX=clang++37 CPP=clang-cpp37 .endif The build ends with - [ 42%] Building C object source/blender/editors/datafiles/CMakeFiles/bf_editor_datafiles.dir/__/__/__/__/release/datafiles/matcaps/mc04.jpg.c.o Assertion failed: (!DMEntry && "Decl already exists in localdeclmap!"), function EmitAutoVarAlloca, file /wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/llvm37/work/llvm-3.7.0rc1.src/tools/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGDecl.cpp, line 1016. [ 42%] Building C object source/blender/bmesh/CMakeFiles/bf_bmesh.dir/operators/bmo_create.c.o clang-3.7: error: unable to execute command: Abort trap clang-3.7: error: clang frontend command failed due to signal (use -v to see invocation) clang version 3.7.0 (tags/RELEASE_370/rc1) Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd10.2 Thread model: posix clang-3.7: note: diagnostic msg: PLEASE submit a bug report to http://llvm.org/bugs/ and include the crash backtrace, preprocessed source, and associated run script. clang-3.7: note: diagnostic msg: ******************** PLEASE ATTACH THE FOLLOWING FILES TO THE BUG REPORT: Preprocessed source(s) and associated run script(s) are located at: clang-3.7: note: diagnostic msg: /tmp/BLI_kdopbvh-8090d7.c clang-3.7: note: diagnostic msg: /tmp/BLI_kdopbvh-8090d7.sh clang-3.7: note: diagnostic msg: ******************** Full build log and debug files are available at http://shaneware.biz/freebsddebugdata/clang37/ Brooks, I haven't submitted this upstream but can if you want. -- FreeBSD - the place to B...Software Developing Shane Ambler From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 5 16:14:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 286C49B4F79 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 16:14:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FAC127B for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 16:14:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 0EC059B4F78; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 16:14:59 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E4F69B4F77 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 16:14:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: from spindle.one-eyed-alien.net (spindle.one-eyed-alien.net [199.48.129.229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE4AE27A; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 16:14:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from brooks@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net) Received: by spindle.one-eyed-alien.net (Postfix, from userid 3001) id F40935A9F11; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 16:08:06 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 16:08:06 +0000 From: Brooks Davis To: Shane Ambler Cc: Brooks Davis , ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Does OpenMP (iomp5) work for clang-devel? Message-ID: <20150805160806.GB30265@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> References: <1437439738.57135.5.camel@pki2.com> <20150721010727.GA64147@spindle.one-eyed-alien.net> <1437442196.57135.13.camel@pki2.com> <55AE0474.5050207@ShaneWare.Biz> <55C206CE.2070904@ShaneWare.Biz> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55C206CE.2070904@ShaneWare.Biz> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 16:14:59 -0000 --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 10:21:26PM +0930, Shane Ambler wrote: > On 21/07/2015 18:06, Shane Ambler wrote: > > On 21/07/2015 10:59, Dennis Glatting wrote: > >> On Tue, 2015-07-21 at 01:07 +0000, Brooks Davis wrote: > >>> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 05:48:58PM -0700, Dennis Glatting wrote: > >>>> I can't seem to get this working and it appears not to emit code. I > >>>> have > >>>> libiomp5 installed and I compile specifying: > >>>> > >>>> clang++-devel -fopenmp=3Dlibiomp5 ... > >>>> > >>>> And the compiler says: > >>>> > >>>> clang: warning: argument unused during compilation: > >>>> '-fopenmp=3Dlibiomp5' > > > > That should be just -fopenmp > > > > From http://blog.llvm.org/2015/05/openmp-support_22.html > > > > To enable OpenMP, just add ???????-fopenmp???????? to the command line = and provide > > paths to OpenMP headers and library with ???????-I -L <= LLVM > > OpenMP library path>????????. >=20 > Having just installed devel/llvm37 and done a few tests, this doesn't > appear to happen, for a single file test I also need to add -lomp >=20 > clang37 -fopenmp -I/usr/local/llvm37/include -L/usr/local/llvm37/lib > -lomp omp.c -o omp-test Hmm, I hadn't tested openmp yet. I had hoped that setting the cmake variab= le to default to libomp has sufficient but apparently it isn't. I'd like to g= et -fopenmp working on it's own, but probably won't have a whole lot of time to push this forward. > One issue is that lldb breaks qtcreator. Sounds odd but I get - >=20 > [leader:~] shane% qtcreator > QProcess: Destroyed while process ("/usr/local/bin/lldb-mi-devel") is=20 > still running. > QProcess: Destroyed while process ("/usr/local/bin/lldb-mi37") is still= =20 > running. > Broken pipe > [leader:~] shane% >=20 > If I rename the two binaries reported qtcreator runs fine. > qtcreator-3.4.0 - rebuilt while llvm37 was installed without change. This looks like qtcreator is being too smart for it's own good and is using two versions of lldb at the same time. That seems likely to not work. > My main interest in openmp is for compiling graphics/blender. > This breaks llvm37 - >=20 > I am running 10-stable - > FreeBSD leader.local 10.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 10.2-PRERELEASE #16=20 > r285937: Tue Jul 28 20:58:13 ACST 2015=20 > root@leader.local:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 >=20 > % pkg info -ox llvm37 > llvm37-3.7.0.r1 devel/llvm37 >=20 > Adding to make.conf - > .if ${.CURDIR:M*/graphics/blender*} > CC=3Dclang37 > CXX=3Dclang++37 > CPP=3Dclang-cpp37 > .endif >=20 > The build ends with - >=20 > [ 42%] Building C object=20 > source/blender/editors/datafiles/CMakeFiles/bf_editor_datafiles.dir/__/__= /__/__/release/datafiles/matcaps/mc04.jpg.c.o > Assertion failed: (!DMEntry && "Decl already exists in localdeclmap!"),= =20 > function EmitAutoVarAlloca, file=20 > /wrkdirs/usr/ports/devel/llvm37/work/llvm-3.7.0rc1.src/tools/clang/lib/Co= deGen/CGDecl.cpp,=20 > line 1016. > [ 42%] Building C object=20 > source/blender/bmesh/CMakeFiles/bf_bmesh.dir/operators/bmo_create.c.o > clang-3.7: error: unable to execute command: Abort trap > clang-3.7: error: clang frontend command failed due to signal (use -v to= =20 > see invocation) > clang version 3.7.0 (tags/RELEASE_370/rc1) > Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd10.2 > Thread model: posix > clang-3.7: note: diagnostic msg: PLEASE submit a bug report to=20 > http://llvm.org/bugs/ and include the crash backtrace, preprocessed=20 > source, and associated run script. > clang-3.7: note: diagnostic msg: > ******************** >=20 > PLEASE ATTACH THE FOLLOWING FILES TO THE BUG REPORT: > Preprocessed source(s) and associated run script(s) are located at: > clang-3.7: note: diagnostic msg: /tmp/BLI_kdopbvh-8090d7.c > clang-3.7: note: diagnostic msg: /tmp/BLI_kdopbvh-8090d7.sh > clang-3.7: note: diagnostic msg: >=20 > ******************** >=20 > Full build log and debug files are available at > http://shaneware.biz/freebsddebugdata/clang37/ >=20 > Brooks, I haven't submitted this upstream but can if you want. You might test with clang-devel first, but submitting this upstream is a good idea. I don't develop llvm myself so can't do anything particularly useful with crash reports. -- Brooks --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVwjTlAAoJEKzQXbSebgfAHtYH/1b5hXIUNr9AkqtwNO+DJHIX TAiocd1LuxSzDkWSWiVX3rc+E2IKVhqTNC4SUEPNJ+/6Oe7Kj8ONtAOOPgf5m2XS tXvoAE51e4jxyyka2kiHT9lokNuf8SYgL90eAITOAUYkCUykruhbQ68j3QupVg2L hwgn5JHQiu68lzjSRuRhiAVXEwtxFXSant0NlFvLxAv3UwPswc6fTu33l4Eg3Vnj miiKmziUYm7rDYJ7r3+bw9O/jQqU6IOAttLlZE8c6cCTiB3C/x+usIU+o+yyI4l5 b0MQf4pvzO59Vppmz4rjnBnGqHY5rUacKGkf9n4s1mBSKbnOK4wT4eIgLIau41g= =z31g -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --0OAP2g/MAC+5xKAE-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 5 18:36:20 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7047E9B44AA for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 18:36:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aorchid@mac.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EFFC14D for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 18:36:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aorchid@mac.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 5C44E9B44A9; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 18:36:20 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5ADDA9B44A7 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 18:36:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aorchid@mac.com) Received: from outbound1a.ore.mailhop.org (outbound1a.ore.mailhop.org [54.213.22.21]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2421114C for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 18:36:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aorchid@mac.com) Received: from freeenv.localnet (unknown [149.142.103.161]) by outbound1.ore.mailhop.org (Halon Mail Gateway) with ESMTPSA for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 18:35:22 +0000 (UTC) From: Aric Gregson To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Telegram-cli Issues Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 11:35:11 -0700 Message-ID: <2779085.C0rFOdmndD@freeenv> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.3 (FreeBSD/10.1-RELEASE-p16; KDE/4.14.3; amd64; ; ) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 18:36:20 -0000 Hello, I am no longer able to make net-im/telegram-cli work. I believe this happened when I upgraded to 10.1 some time ago. I have reinstalled the program via portmaster several times to no avail. Basically, the program will start, but it does nothing. It will not connect to the telegram network, as I cannot see any chats nor initiate any chats. It also will not report the contents of the address book. Even the show_license command fails to do anything. Curious if anyone else has seen this issue. Thanks, ARic From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 5 20:05:54 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DB899B495F for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 20:05:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-x233.google.com (mail-ob0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA4DE2D1 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 20:05:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by obnw1 with SMTP id w1so40069972obn.3 for ; Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:05:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=QLoXufWwp+3HCBMLRkNAdpRcmyp2lEBjbQZ9wefAec0=; b=AYAlKFRf/SUXgw684PCEBI0kye8jGDxgXnb7JOE0PrxD60bvNHBMcA+na1jxQ6I6kn 39b+2d9rYOA/1fY1OnAdwNKqKNAdyW8NfdAMDh5oBtWRkQZdW9ubJBWeI/KVwKJU20wp 8h9fpOE+cUZwDwY/SgRoEupHQV7cYyRrCCwwak5aGHJXRcSoNmrUQauF9XQ9OyApQiYq 0eGdvFdlQRe9yDi2DtWBLf7BC3lCFcxCtAX+CrQj0srXhq373umN8QKRFEvFtrGQS/qF WKq4rosqhkRr0U9tw8U6gXUtho9y5s3temqgY8WvjE3SX/czcJ0e/6LEbyDO7Lf8Xt91 QEfg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.177.73 with SMTP id co9mr9557429oec.5.1438805153112; Wed, 05 Aug 2015 13:05:53 -0700 (PDT) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.202.221.69 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 13:05:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 13:05:53 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 8BtI0GA5rCVBQ9p3oTl3iDEZmkU Message-ID: Subject: Unable to relocate to new svn URL From: Kevin Oberman To: Peter Wemm , FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 20:05:54 -0000 Today I decided to relocate my ports source from the old specific mirror to the new svn.freebsd.org. Seemed like just one easy command, but not quite. First, if subversion is built with the default options, it will refuse to do https:// with the confusing message that the URL format was not recognized. I checked and my svn was notbuilt with SASL. SASL is not on by default. So I rebuilt subversion and now it likes the command, but won't accept the certificate: Error validating server certificate for 'https://svn.freebsd.org:443': - The certificate is not issued by a trusted authority. Use the fingerprint to validate the certificate manually! Certificate information: - Hostname: svn.freebsd.org - Valid: from Jun 22 00:00:00 2015 GMT until Jun 22 23:59:59 2016 GMT - Issuer: Gandi, Paris, Paris, FR - Fingerprint: E9:37:73:80:B5:32:1B:93:92:94:98:17:59:F0:FA:A2:5F:1E:DE:B9 (R)eject, accept (t)emporarily or accept (p)ermanently? Indeed, it does not appear that Gandi is on the certificate.txt. file installed by ca_root_nss. Is this a problem with the ca_root_nss port, the certificate, of is something hacked? Clearly, I am not about to trust the certificate as it now stands. -- Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 5 20:21:41 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DCF29B4DD9 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 20:21:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from tensor.andric.com (tensor.andric.com [IPv6:2001:7b8:3a7:1:2d0:b7ff:fea0:8c26]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "tensor.andric.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D4C1EFE4 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 20:21:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [172.16.103.6] (unknown [77.95.97.98]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7E7AB2560B; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 22:21:36 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Unable to relocate to new svn URL Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2102\)) Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_E69E711E-CBDC-4C4A-B910-064AD851081F"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5 From: Dimitry Andric In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 22:21:24 +0200 Cc: Peter Wemm , FreeBSD Ports ML Message-Id: References: To: Kevin Oberman X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2102) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 20:21:41 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_E69E711E-CBDC-4C4A-B910-064AD851081F Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii On 05 Aug 2015, at 22:05, Kevin Oberman wrote: >=20 > Today I decided to relocate my ports source from the old specific = mirror to > the new svn.freebsd.org. Seemed like just one easy command, but not = quite. >=20 > First, if subversion is built with the default options, it will refuse = to > do https:// with the confusing message that the URL format was not > recognized. I checked and my svn was notbuilt with SASL. SASL is not = on by > default. So I rebuilt subversion and now it likes the command, but = won't > accept the certificate: > Error validating server certificate for 'https://svn.freebsd.org:443': > - The certificate is not issued by a trusted authority. Use the > fingerprint to validate the certificate manually! > Certificate information: > - Hostname: svn.freebsd.org > - Valid: from Jun 22 00:00:00 2015 GMT until Jun 22 23:59:59 2016 GMT > - Issuer: Gandi, Paris, Paris, FR > - Fingerprint: = E9:37:73:80:B5:32:1B:93:92:94:98:17:59:F0:FA:A2:5F:1E:DE:B9 > (R)eject, accept (t)emporarily or accept (p)ermanently? >=20 > Indeed, it does not appear that Gandi is on the certificate.txt. file > installed by ca_root_nss. Not directly, the Gandi Standard SSL CA 2 certificate is issued by the following root CA: Serial Number: 01:fd:6d:30:fc:a3:ca:51:a8:1b:bc:64:0e:35:03:2d Subject: C=3DUS, ST=3DNew Jersey, L=3DJersey City, O=3DThe USERTRUST = Network, CN=3DUSERTrust RSA Certification Authority > Is this a problem with the ca_root_nss port, the certificate, of is > something hacked? Clearly, I am not about to trust the certificate as = it > now stands. Which version of ca_root_nss do you have? Mine is 3.19.1_1, and it definitely has the above root CA in /etc/ssl/cert.pem. -Dimitry --Apple-Mail=_E69E711E-CBDC-4C4A-B910-064AD851081F Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.27 iEYEARECAAYFAlXCcE8ACgkQsF6jCi4glqPXrwCfRnLQSacOqx1vtb4d3HJb+dq2 ZyYAn0CCIyYAs2UbDawVv9S2gbRPe0gy =c4Nk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_E69E711E-CBDC-4C4A-B910-064AD851081F-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 5 21:50:20 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F86B9B4238 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 21:50:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D867393B for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 21:50:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-ports@m.gmane.org) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZN6Zd-0006HQ-Rw for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 05 Aug 2015 23:50:09 +0200 Received: from p4ffb9037.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([79.251.144.55]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 05 Aug 2015 23:50:09 +0200 Received: from jumper99 by p4ffb9037.dip0.t-ipconnect.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 05 Aug 2015 23:50:09 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: "Helmut Schneider" Subject: Require PHP>=5.5 and MySQL>=5.5 Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 21:49:58 +0000 (UTC) Lines: 6 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: p4ffb9037.dip0.t-ipconnect.de User-Agent: XanaNews/1.19.1.194 X-Ref: news.gmane.org ~XNS:00000067 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 21:50:20 -0000 Hi, how would I specify the requirements above in the Makefile? It's required for www/typo3. Thanks, Helmut From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 5 21:54:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E2A09B43DC for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 21:54:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpm@fbsd.es) Received: from imap11-3.ox.privateemail.com (imap11-3.ox.privateemail.com [198.187.29.245]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "privateemail.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB7DCC4B for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 21:54:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpm@fbsd.es) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by imap11.ox.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D17EB8800D2; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 17:54:53 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at imap11.ox.privateemail.com Received: from imap11.ox.privateemail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (imap11.ox.privateemail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id T_qGqaV0gzJO; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 17:54:53 -0400 (EDT) Received: from daemonlab (120.Red-83-58-115.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [83.58.115.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by imap11.ox.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C3CCD8800ED; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 17:54:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1438811675.26770.4.camel@fbsd.es> Subject: Re: Telegram-cli Issues From: Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina To: "aorchid@mac.com" , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 23:54:35 +0200 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-+Bm/xV5HIMAxbr3e1faH" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.4 (3.16.4-2.fc22) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 21:54:59 -0000 --=-+Bm/xV5HIMAxbr3e1faH Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I just updated telegram port to 1.3.1 release (see PR/202113). It works fine, so if recently you upgraded to FreeBSD/10.1 you should rebuild all ports (e.g. using portmaster) # portmaster -af Regards,--=20 Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina PGP fingerprint =3D C60E 9497 5302 793B CC2D BB89 A1F3 5D66 E6D0 5453 --=-+Bm/xV5HIMAxbr3e1faH Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAABCAAGBQJVwoYcAAoJEKHzXWbm0FRTgqIH/iV4hpJr8U/T6o9VWrzpuaOW ZjU310MWICyo6YNXebv3CNIaKYDbYRSTW0UORsaUGwQ/m0WJlnD17keVy+mxCslB eTvkmd47IYtEYFHVMg1TjVY14J37QgbKff1IVUStte9SCARA1Dhm12uif3EwfqN0 wYleI3vldt6NjNz9+Bv9f7qnSBStIZIgO/SYCBkObnzVDHN14D8bmZ2xsuFKFWS8 xwjjhi8b17vppQ8A5KRXeHlqzjGPtbCkkTZmZ8s53rWO10iABqfafVyjZ0PsE+1b y8VW9VgRH526IYZFL/Mjso7V+jM1AWy9kUQUQR1rshm9tXyuBb+yPh+OAResEw0= =LCi3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-+Bm/xV5HIMAxbr3e1faH-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 5 22:07:05 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02CB89B494E for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 22:07:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi0-x235.google.com (mail-oi0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD18B2E9; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 22:07:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by oigu206 with SMTP id u206so17227698oig.3; Wed, 05 Aug 2015 15:07:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=5mfjeng/YdTRBI7LxTUkmQJUVVed7pvtMFm3WHLmRMg=; b=mM9W1UXHjkuzmrhco0FHSSxZ1UQVcQmHbnQEdM6YILTUgGqvL18QMIjEI397jzHChY xjdD41aUZBK2T/DWeNdw3ehAumWCg8WpYDTmnbM5Xln5ZU3FpRilAnfBcQV3OYEyU5r/ wSfXWz4vF4zQr0TFSNzbaBbXrOh3Fo1nIJ1fsLC46qpmTyBbGM56F/PcO4bwqWnqI8iT D1n8BMgAPsq0LO0GPnlcsdfQaITncotwuv9hY1aH4hJ7SA1+/7pC6+gKLvTKK5yDGzCh fPX6yKj60ua1bJ8pgOz5zTgd2Kl1eOtg9O3kHYWZUsWU+ZZe6XhM5nTTo6laRKCy9ASS 1aWQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.169.215 with SMTP id s206mr9764906oie.71.1438812424092; Wed, 05 Aug 2015 15:07:04 -0700 (PDT) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.202.221.69 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 15:07:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 15:07:04 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: qO7VAMx8L2Xcbdpqcuhj1o9xFFc Message-ID: Subject: Re: Unable to relocate to new svn URL From: Kevin Oberman To: Dimitry Andric Cc: Peter Wemm , FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 22:07:05 -0000 On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 1:21 PM, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On 05 Aug 2015, at 22:05, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > > Today I decided to relocate my ports source from the old specific mirror > to > > the new svn.freebsd.org. Seemed like just one easy command, but not > quite. > > > > First, if subversion is built with the default options, it will refuse to > > do https:// with the confusing message that the URL format was not > > recognized. I checked and my svn was notbuilt with SASL. SASL is not on > by > > default. So I rebuilt subversion and now it likes the command, but won't > > accept the certificate: > > Error validating server certificate for 'https://svn.freebsd.org:443': > > - The certificate is not issued by a trusted authority. Use the > > fingerprint to validate the certificate manually! > > Certificate information: > > - Hostname: svn.freebsd.org > > - Valid: from Jun 22 00:00:00 2015 GMT until Jun 22 23:59:59 2016 GMT > > - Issuer: Gandi, Paris, Paris, FR > > - Fingerprint: > E9:37:73:80:B5:32:1B:93:92:94:98:17:59:F0:FA:A2:5F:1E:DE:B9 > > (R)eject, accept (t)emporarily or accept (p)ermanently? > > > > Indeed, it does not appear that Gandi is on the certificate.txt. file > > installed by ca_root_nss. > > Not directly, the Gandi Standard SSL CA 2 certificate is issued by the > following root CA: > > Serial Number: 01:fd:6d:30:fc:a3:ca:51:a8:1b:bc:64:0e:35:03:2d > Subject: C=US, ST=New Jersey, L=Jersey City, O=The USERTRUST Network, > CN=USERTrust RSA Certification Authority > > > > Is this a problem with the ca_root_nss port, the certificate, of is > > something hacked? Clearly, I am not about to trust the certificate as it > > now stands. > > Which version of ca_root_nss do you have? Mine is 3.19.1_1, and it > definitely has the above root CA in /etc/ssl/cert.pem. > > -Dimitry > Thanks for the quick response! I'm still confused, though. I have 3.19.2, so it is just a bit newer. But I don't have /etc/ssl/cert.pem. The root certs are installed in /usr/local/share/certs/ca-root-nss.crt. Is something required to get them into /etc/ssl? I confirm that the fingerprints match. Also, the handbook needs a bit of work. It shows the use of svn.freebsd.org, but the text just prior to the example still talks about " the western US repository". Later text discuses the GeoDNS and svn.frebsd.org. (Yes, this is nit-picking.) Any idea why my use of SVN is complaining? Now that I have verified the fingerprint, I can go on and accept the cert, but why is this happening and will it bite others? -- Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Aug 5 22:18:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D07FA9B3089 for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 22:18:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (mx.catwhisker.org [198.144.209.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5022FE8A for ; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 22:18:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t75MHruE046663; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 15:17:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david@albert.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id t75MHqmd046662; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 15:17:52 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david) Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 15:17:52 -0700 From: David Wolfskill To: Kevin Oberman Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML Subject: Re: Unable to relocate to new svn URL Message-ID: <20150805221752.GF1056@albert.catwhisker.org> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="r5zNLCKCFspl+eMg" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2015 22:18:06 -0000 --r5zNLCKCFspl+eMg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 03:07:04PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > ... > > Which version of ca_root_nss do you have? Mine is 3.19.1_1, and it > > definitely has the above root CA in /etc/ssl/cert.pem. > > > > -Dimitry > > >=20 > Thanks for the quick response! I'm still confused, though. >=20 > I have 3.19.2, so it is just a bit newer. But I don't have > /etc/ssl/cert.pem. The root certs are installed in > /usr/local/share/certs/ca-root-nss.crt. Is something required to get them > into /etc/ssl? I confirm that the fingerprints match. Looks as if the relevant option (on the port) is: ETCSYMLINK=3Doff: Add symlink to /etc/ssl/cert.pem Apparently I had that on at one point (perhaps it was a default), as: g1-245(10.2-P)[7] ls -lT /etc/ssl/cert.pem=20 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 38 Feb 12 13:17:49 2015 /etc/ssl/cert.pem -> /us= r/local/share/certs/ca-root-nss.crt >... Peace, david --=20 David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org Those who would murder in the name of God or prophet are blasphemous coward= s. See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --r5zNLCKCFspl+eMg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVwouQXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ4RThEMDY4QTIxMjc1MDZFRDIzODYzRTc4 QTY3RjlDOERFRjQxOTNCAAoJEIpn+cje9Bk79mgP/1gnCfnhuty8+F/In3lfnwgy xAGWXVUvJe+EMsAA74s5uBH8QifASFuYhLV4MC3f5Fb5pU3odpyTyylp6Kvg9EX6 xyWNykXJXM2tEzzcyLTDhv6b5EeL2wB+x5yJkpLctMxfW5hFsILDm7O/IEWp9djg 6qLCv+rdseBwA5fEcelc4FU+cZ43u5VtmnpWn56z1rMX3aObF6LKT9cWKglTJc3G uwVthtkhPZ/kH+Th/BOYGHkW2QZllGjj/8OG2Fbvd8uKNWzf7pEZIVFLvpTTlSz0 WO/sRY01roMEkAW4Rt7Z7se/TeRYEp1mKJUqbzrvyQH1B9X8zC/TkFdLKb+KEq/d ehl/oyARyN1+5frfzIWT7JbpFxcj5sX/chAScIBUBewromnvxWQj9j6Uo8ZPo8rx wqMQ1begHpSMVgJTJPyUtAOETt8TWGE9OI+fNotKb0LrwV+nkeSeoiM7cZS+bxZ3 dbGfyumlKM2QBK7k9MWGBaBItANDWZl0C0IX9U8cpUoC7oSDO/59OEItZcCezkeb nPlLQNsjlQnyuHNu+m5Fr2XHp8DCuvP+H0QlWNRaOvySZVSlemKtVsOVR9zjci8C IoB4wmKOhBugM7l5J1FRgSQmlw/tBLh3SzDqNfH2S5DiSyGNfKHz2dm8G2aWndJQ HkCs5HHmaeZsfjzAFOMv =VidL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --r5zNLCKCFspl+eMg-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Aug 6 02:08:32 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4752F9B27BF for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 02:08:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 290D51CBA for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 02:08:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 27F829B27BE; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 02:08:32 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26A299B27BD for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 02:08:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from mail-ig0-f171.google.com (mail-ig0-f171.google.com [209.85.213.171]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFC701CB9 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 02:08:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: by igbpg9 with SMTP id pg9so2539674igb.0 for ; Wed, 05 Aug 2015 19:08:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=RrNU3pgyRT8Xdee7eiTZ++M9a6yKLJcUzcAMu3hzRcs=; b=ePtUuRXb+xQKg69im0QEglmF8uXzEIAXGjDXYco26PhbFagtaxwZNTdp9ncq1hX1UY eY2UQsVXV3Em6Ttwo3s1lB+SzRnz8fUdf9mVooh/zusVJ2JEMymGJj66zn1bwGViGZej vFIqEXyQZMDqn7uWCa/Etkbbnm+qZbqlenyhn8IDnjvT6UygurQlaHpHftJ7j3oEZp5H aaVjQLNu2Cj7j0/16oZMwF/tV3j6768Pe+9Mw3efinahBtGOxfPevB7Gyen5+oOnuw56 EUpC47ahUXWgvNq1EiD4Tb3mSfIA31tEhqOcUUU5ER7IOa0gwuHY/dNdlZT2NEX3cIlr Djfg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlYtWd1i87KIJNdBy/CBRxsWOCL3ilI2SdWIAuv/yEDOzT84MOFOYMyzg8V76Rssrn268/G X-Received: by 10.50.122.40 with SMTP id lp8mr785133igb.49.1438826904911; Wed, 05 Aug 2015 19:08:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.195.199 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 19:07:45 -0700 (PDT) X-Originating-IP: [71.246.253.67] From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 22:07:45 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: [ANNOUNCE]: ports-mgmt/freebsd-bugzilla-cli To: ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 02:08:32 -0000 Fellow porters, The long awaited replacement for ports-mgmt/porttools `port submit` has been created! Along with tons of other cool functionality. Despite the port category, it also includes src (base system) functionality. https://github.com/pgollucci/freebsd-bugzilla-cli/blob/master/README.md https://freshports.org/ports-mgmt/freebsd-bugzilla-cli/ https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/ports-mgmt/freebsd-bugzilla-cli/ While this provides the ability for substantial automation, it is not replacement for human quality quality checks. This software was developed with feedback and testing from: jmg@ pi@ All bugs go to me. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Curb: Your ride is here 4096R/D21D2752 ECDF B597 B54B 7F92 753E E0EA F699 A450 D21D 2752 Philip M. Gollucci (pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354 Member, Apache Software Foundation Committer, FreeBSD Foundation Consultant, P6M7G8 Inc. Sr. Director IT Operations, Curb What doesn't kill us can only make us stronger; Except it almost kills you. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Aug 6 03:04:18 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4EF99B38CB for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 03:04:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-x22b.google.com (mail-pa0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CBE71DF3 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 03:04:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by pawu10 with SMTP id u10so51073059paw.1 for ; Wed, 05 Aug 2015 20:04:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:reply-to:subject:references:to:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Qmf1hGJFAR7pZQjqWhDlwaa5VdGpk2ussaOhbQvRwb4=; b=ey9QYyV6HjTZu873/7wK82XhgwRq8hDh1gngLwnQTJiFAdJeg1EgUZnFthK61pA2Xx L2FvVJZFPfmjXzAqc5Vy+gRWqplIJHJ2EYgSJcqEFXFkExnjG1alS+FRVjrxKrrX4HGJ J+JP23Q+eN0Qkd03U6gV8nciLoR7uCmgSqHqEABFjX8hAZjp1EuvhEEJfrM7dONMjhSB /cgt8OkGFXAQDiAFvFhK6XFrL6cRsh7U6bB9zbHNcR4VatNcAxoEF14eQmYGoJas8ZrF o4qPvVP+pxMjqxVimMF/sd+tPiSjDZwc+kXLg5juLK5azvOfZ4N1BKd2sWUbHATlEENG +4rg== X-Received: by 10.68.113.37 with SMTP id iv5mr26316246pbb.104.1438830257866; Wed, 05 Aug 2015 20:04:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:44b8:31ae:7b01::2? (2001-44b8-31ae-7b01-0000-0000-0000-0002.static.ipv6.internode.on.net. [2001:44b8:31ae:7b01::2]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w17sm4474314pbt.17.2015.08.05.20.04.15 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 05 Aug 2015 20:04:17 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Kubilay Kocak Reply-To: koobs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Unable to relocate to new svn URL References: <20150805221752.GF1056@albert.catwhisker.org> To: David Wolfskill , Kevin Oberman Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML From: Kubilay Kocak Message-ID: <55C2CEA8.8050200@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 13:04:08 +1000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:40.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/40.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150805221752.GF1056@albert.catwhisker.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 03:04:18 -0000 On 6/08/2015 8:17 AM, David Wolfskill wrote: > On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 03:07:04PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: >> ... >>> Which version of ca_root_nss do you have? Mine is 3.19.1_1, and it >>> definitely has the above root CA in /etc/ssl/cert.pem. >>> >>> -Dimitry >>> >> >> Thanks for the quick response! I'm still confused, though. >> >> I have 3.19.2, so it is just a bit newer. But I don't have >> /etc/ssl/cert.pem. The root certs are installed in >> /usr/local/share/certs/ca-root-nss.crt. Is something required to get them >> into /etc/ssl? I confirm that the fingerprints match. > > Looks as if the relevant option (on the port) is: > > ETCSYMLINK=off: Add symlink to /etc/ssl/cert.pem > > Apparently I had that on at one point (perhaps it was a default), as: It was off, but was made an OPTIONS_DEFAULT for out of the box SSL verification goodness: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/388657 There was a complementary change for ports software here committed earlier: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/378720 > g1-245(10.2-P)[7] ls -lT /etc/ssl/cert.pem > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 38 Feb 12 13:17:49 2015 /etc/ssl/cert.pem -> /usr/local/share/certs/ca-root-nss.crt > > >> ... > > Peace, > david > From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Aug 6 03:44:08 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4559E9B42B7 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 03:44:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-x22f.google.com (mail-ob0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0A85C10F9; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 03:44:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by obbop1 with SMTP id op1so46919419obb.2; Wed, 05 Aug 2015 20:44:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=enL+llJ3vAVSvL/OiVthvjQt0yuaX86cujn6zwZ4X6M=; b=IDPD82p87ChwGdMa+PHrPGPniFPqPs1dc7NJy3a1fcdM9017EnHBRbs8092uEW62ml UI7JEWJaZ6HoDoD4GFm5ruoPc4QS2wT2cvwrqXDnUZEiQnITFEZaosiSwE2u7atLdtr3 W4WojHUBpHj8vKJ+fphZgO5xZowNzZ+WUzc8Yqf+W7wy2NOgidI4H/39ygmQjn9GNgqI fVDI3PDacwDwwmMR25ckLsEEBsXk+S431mtcpMpKDev0AQVtzLISQ1wpIESUe4DPsHsB Ef2O2wD1vHO8V4V6tOsOboc/dCP6AEMuazP/haYY3et8GMrlHmyklq/FdJvOMx/mYqh+ nWSA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.230.234 with SMTP id tb10mr11640119obc.23.1438832647114; Wed, 05 Aug 2015 20:44:07 -0700 (PDT) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.202.221.69 with HTTP; Wed, 5 Aug 2015 20:44:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <55C2CEA8.8050200@FreeBSD.org> References: <20150805221752.GF1056@albert.catwhisker.org> <55C2CEA8.8050200@FreeBSD.org> Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2015 20:44:07 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: yqn9Cwb6UzuZ_wQslBv42Up2znc Message-ID: Subject: Re: Unable to relocate to new svn URL From: Kevin Oberman To: koobs@freebsd.org Cc: David Wolfskill , FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 03:44:08 -0000 On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 8:04 PM, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > On 6/08/2015 8:17 AM, David Wolfskill wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 03:07:04PM -0700, Kevin Oberman wrote: > >> ... > >>> Which version of ca_root_nss do you have? Mine is 3.19.1_1, and it > >>> definitely has the above root CA in /etc/ssl/cert.pem. > >>> > >>> -Dimitry > >>> > >> > >> Thanks for the quick response! I'm still confused, though. > >> > >> I have 3.19.2, so it is just a bit newer. But I don't have > >> /etc/ssl/cert.pem. The root certs are installed in > >> /usr/local/share/certs/ca-root-nss.crt. Is something required to get > them > >> into /etc/ssl? I confirm that the fingerprints match. > > > > Looks as if the relevant option (on the port) is: > > > > ETCSYMLINK=off: Add symlink to /etc/ssl/cert.pem > > > > Apparently I had that on at one point (perhaps it was a default), as: > > It was off, but was made an OPTIONS_DEFAULT for out of the box SSL > verification goodness: > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/388657 > > There was a complementary change for ports software here committed earlier: > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/378720 > > > g1-245(10.2-P)[7] ls -lT /etc/ssl/cert.pem > > lrwxr-xr-x 1 root wheel 38 Feb 12 13:17:49 2015 /etc/ssl/cert.pem -> > /usr/local/share/certs/ca-root-nss.crt > > > > > >> ... > > > > Peace, > > david > > > > Thanks, Koobs. That was it. Bitten again when an option went from a default of "off" to "on". Not the first time, either. Wish their was a way to note that a default had changed when re-installing a port. We mark new options with '+'. If we added a field in the config file for current defaults, this could be detected and flagged when a port is updated. Any reason that this would not be practical? This still leaves the issue of requiring SASL support in subversion. A note in the handbook section on ports would help, though I'll admit that I probably would not have found it in this case. Perhaps a note in ports/UPDATING might be in order. At least that one was fairly easy to find once I started looking. -- Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Aug 6 09:04:04 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C25E99B31A8 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 09:04:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD9611E1C for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 09:04:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id ACD079B31A7; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 09:04:04 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC6399B31A6 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 09:04:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:6601]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9EF5D1E1B for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 09:04:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.2]) by portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t76944ff023056 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 09:04:04 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild@portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org) Received: (from indexbuild@localhost) by portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id t76944s1023048 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 09:04:04 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 09:04:04 GMT From: Ports Index build Message-Id: <201508060904.t76944s1023048@portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX build failed for 9.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 09:04:04 -0000 INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-9 - please wait..--- describe.accessibility --- --- describe.arabic --- --- describe.archivers --- --- describe.astro --- --- describe.audio --- --- describe.benchmarks --- --- describe.biology --- --- describe.cad --- --- describe.chinese --- --- describe.comms --- --- describe.converters --- --- describe.databases --- --- describe.deskutils --- --- describe.devel --- --- describe.dns --- --- describe.editors --- --- describe.emulators --- --- describe.finance --- --- describe.french --- --- describe.ftp --- [...] --- describe.print --- --- describe.russian --- --- describe.science --- --- describe.security --- --- describe.shells --- --- describe.sysutils --- --- describe.textproc --- --- describe.ukrainian --- --- describe.vietnamese --- --- describe.www --- --- describe.x11 --- --- describe.x11-clocks --- --- describe.x11-drivers --- --- describe.x11-fm --- --- describe.x11-fonts --- --- describe.x11-servers --- --- describe.x11-themes --- --- describe.x11-toolkits --- --- describe.x11-wm --- Done. make_index: /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/textproc/py-snowballstemmer: no entry for /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/textproc/py-pystemmer Committers on the hook: danfe kwm lwhsu robak Most recent SVN update was: Updating '.': D textproc/pystemmer U textproc/py-sphinx/Makefile A textproc/py-pystemmer A textproc/py-pystemmer/Makefile A textproc/py-pystemmer/distinfo A textproc/py-pystemmer/pkg-descr U textproc/py-snowballstemmer/Makefile U MOVED A dns/dnsdbck A dns/dnsdbck/Makefile A dns/dnsdbck/distinfo A dns/dnsdbck/pkg-descr A dns/renewck A dns/renewck/Makefile A dns/renewck/distinfo A dns/renewck/pkg-descr U dns/Makefile U www/webkit2-gtk3/Makefile U graphics/cairo/pkg-plist U graphics/cairo/Makefile U devel/py-robotframework-pabot/distinfo U devel/py-robotframework-pabot/Makefile Updated to revision 393640. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Aug 6 10:59:53 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1CF19B5306 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 10:59:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B49E1300 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 10:59:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from [82.113.98.222] (helo=localhost.unixarea.de) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1ZNItf-0003W4-Lg; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 12:59:39 +0200 Received: from localhost.my.domain (c720-r276659 [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.unixarea.de (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t76Axcij005588 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 6 Aug 2015 12:59:38 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t76Axaqp005587; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 12:59:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 12:59:36 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina Cc: "aorchid@mac.com" , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Telegram-cli Issues Message-ID: <20150806105936.GA5474@c720-r276659> Reply-To: Matthias Apitz Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina , "aorchid@mac.com" , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" References: <1438811675.26770.4.camel@fbsd.es> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <1438811675.26770.4.camel@fbsd.es> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT r269739 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 82.113.98.222 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 10:59:54 -0000 Hello, The Telegram protocol and clients have a feature to shown to the sender when the receiver has read the message, Telegram Support calls this "read" status for messages and says it is an essential feature of Telegram. I call it a violation of the receivers privacy. I have an Ubuntu based mobile which has a Telegram app. We have had a long chat which can be seen here in issue tracker: https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1475915 and both, Telegran Task Force and Canonical, are rejecting to make the read status report at least a configure value and any receiver can decide by its own to enable this or not. Related to this is as well the RFC 3798, which says: 6.2. Privacy Another dimension of security is privacy. There may be cases in which a message recipient does not wish the disposition of messages addressed to him to be known, or is concerned that the sending of MDNs may reveal other sensitive information (e.g., when the message was read). In this situation, it is acceptable for the MUA to issue "denied" MDNs or to silently ignore requests for MDNs. ... For the above mentioned reasons, I have de-installed the Telegram app on my mobile phone. Why I bring this up here? It would be nice, if we (FreeBSD) could add (as a patch in the ports tree) a configuration value to the telegram-cli which does not send such notifications when the configuration says so. What do you (all and Maintainer) think about? matthias -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ guru@unixarea.de, http://www.unixarea.de/ ☎ +49-176-38902045 No! Nein! ¡No! Όχι! -- Ευχαριστούμε! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Aug 6 11:20:18 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89C479B5BC6 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 11:20:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C07FEDB for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 11:20:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ZNJDW-000Omh-Jj; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 13:20:10 +0200 Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 13:20:10 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Matthias Apitz , Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina , "aorchid@mac.com" , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Telegram-cli Issues Message-ID: <20150806112010.GE40589@home.opsec.eu> References: <1438811675.26770.4.camel@fbsd.es> <20150806105936.GA5474@c720-r276659> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150806105936.GA5474@c720-r276659> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 11:20:18 -0000 Hi! > The Telegram protocol and clients have a feature to shown to the sender > when the receiver has read the message, Telegram Support calls this > "read" status for messages and says it is an essential feature of > Telegram. > > I call it a violation of the receivers privacy. 100% agreed. > It would be nice, if we (FreeBSD) could add (as a patch in the ports > tree) a configuration value to the telegram-cli which does not > send such notifications when the configuration says so. > > What do you (all and Maintainer) think about? That would be very useful, yes. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Aug 6 12:04:01 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E8259B3DCE for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 12:04:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A1388FE for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 12:04:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 770CC9B3DCD; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 12:04:01 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76A2D9B3DCC for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 12:04:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:6601]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F0C78FC for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 12:04:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.2]) by portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t76C41Vq071433 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 12:04:01 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild@portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org) Received: (from indexbuild@localhost) by portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id t76C41ix071432 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 12:04:01 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 12:04:01 GMT From: Ports Index build Message-Id: <201508061204.t76C41ix071432@portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX build failed for 9.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 12:04:01 -0000 INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-9 - please wait..--- describe.accessibility --- --- describe.arabic --- --- describe.archivers --- --- describe.astro --- --- describe.audio --- --- describe.benchmarks --- --- describe.biology --- --- describe.cad --- --- describe.chinese --- --- describe.comms --- --- describe.converters --- --- describe.databases --- --- describe.deskutils --- --- describe.devel --- --- describe.dns --- --- describe.editors --- --- describe.emulators --- --- describe.finance --- --- describe.french --- --- describe.ftp --- [...] --- describe.print --- --- describe.russian --- --- describe.science --- --- describe.security --- --- describe.shells --- --- describe.sysutils --- --- describe.textproc --- --- describe.ukrainian --- --- describe.vietnamese --- --- describe.www --- --- describe.x11 --- --- describe.x11-clocks --- --- describe.x11-drivers --- --- describe.x11-fm --- --- describe.x11-fonts --- --- describe.x11-servers --- --- describe.x11-themes --- --- describe.x11-toolkits --- --- describe.x11-wm --- Done. make_index: /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/textproc/py-snowballstemmer: no entry for /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/textproc/py-pystemmer Committers on the hook: amdmi3 ashish danfe kwm lwhsu marino robak tijl Most recent SVN update was: Updating '.': U mail/squirrelmail-calendar_file_backend-plugin/pkg-plist U mail/squirrelmail-change_ldappass-plugin/pkg-plist U devel/automake/Makefile U devel/autoconf/Makefile U devel/gmake/Makefile U devel/autoconf-wrapper/Makefile U devel/gettext/Makefile.common U devel/autoconf213/Makefile U devel/autotools/Makefile U devel/libtool/Makefile.common U devel/jep/Makefile U deskutils/virt-manager/Makefile U dns/Makefile A dns/axfr2acl A dns/axfr2acl/Makefile A dns/axfr2acl/distinfo A dns/axfr2acl/pkg-descr U dns/whoseip/Makefile U dns/whoseip/pkg-descr A dns/rpsl2acl A dns/rpsl2acl/Makefile A dns/rpsl2acl/distinfo A dns/rpsl2acl/pkg-descr U net-im/ejabberd/pkg-plist U net-im/ejabberd/Makefile U net-im/ejabberd/distinfo U security/kpcli/Makefile U security/kpcli/distinfo U security/Makefile A security/p5-Crypt-PWSafe3 A security/p5-Crypt-PWSafe3/distinfo A security/p5-Crypt-PWSafe3/pkg-descr A security/p5-Crypt-PWSafe3/pkg-plist A security/p5-Crypt-PWSafe3/Makefile U databases/evolution-data-server/pkg-plist U databases/evolution-data-server/Makefile Updated to revision 393653. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Aug 6 12:56:45 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9E4A9B4D10 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 12:56:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 73F85113 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 12:56:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from [82.113.98.222] (helo=localhost.unixarea.de) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1ZNKip-0006Qe-Uq; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 14:56:36 +0200 Received: from localhost.my.domain (c720-r276659 [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.unixarea.de (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t76CuYYM013380 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 6 Aug 2015 14:56:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t76CuYOD013379; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 14:56:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 14:56:34 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: Kurt Jaeger Cc: Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina , "aorchid@mac.com" , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Telegram-cli Issues Message-ID: <20150806125634.GA13335@c720-r276659> Reply-To: Matthias Apitz Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , Kurt Jaeger , Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina , "aorchid@mac.com" , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" References: <1438811675.26770.4.camel@fbsd.es> <20150806105936.GA5474@c720-r276659> <20150806112010.GE40589@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20150806112010.GE40589@home.opsec.eu> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT r269739 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 82.113.98.222 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 12:56:45 -0000 El día Thursday, August 06, 2015 a las 01:20:10PM +0200, Kurt Jaeger escribió: > > It would be nice, if we (FreeBSD) could add (as a patch in the ports > > tree) a configuration value to the telegram-cli which does not > > send such notifications when the configuration says so. > > > > What do you (all and Maintainer) think about? > > That would be very useful, yes. My ports tree on my netbook is from October 18, last year; I just fetched the files for the port from svn and luckily they compile fine: $ telegram-cli Telegram-cli version 1.3.1, Copyright (C) 2013-2015 Vitaly Valtman ... phone number: +49-176-38902045 code ('call' for phone call): 73469 User Matthias Apitz online (was online [2015/08/06 14:48:37]) > > All done. Exit halt I will see if I can open another account with some other mobile number I own and send me messages from Telegam's web interface... to see and debug how the sender gets informed when I receive a message. The cli seems to have de debug output option.. matthias -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ guru@unixarea.de, http://www.unixarea.de/ ☎ +49-176-38902045 No! Nein! ¡No! Όχι! -- Ευχαριστούμε! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Aug 6 14:52:03 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 946639B4AEC for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 14:52:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 51A3B9E7 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 14:52:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from [93.104.17.131] (helo=localhost.unixarea.de) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1ZNMWN-0004BB-On; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 16:51:52 +0200 Received: from localhost.my.domain (c720-r276659 [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.unixarea.de (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t76EpoqO003373 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 6 Aug 2015 16:51:50 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t76EpnP5003372; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 16:51:49 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 16:51:44 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: Kurt Jaeger , Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina , "aorchid@mac.com" , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Telegram-cli Issues Message-ID: <20150806145144.GA3358@c720-r276659> Reply-To: Matthias Apitz Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , Kurt Jaeger , Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina , "aorchid@mac.com" , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" References: <1438811675.26770.4.camel@fbsd.es> <20150806105936.GA5474@c720-r276659> <20150806112010.GE40589@home.opsec.eu> <20150806125634.GA13335@c720-r276659> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20150806125634.GA13335@c720-r276659> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT r269739 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 93.104.17.131 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 14:52:03 -0000 El día Thursday, August 06, 2015 a las 02:56:34PM +0200, Matthias Apitz escribió: > $ telegram-cli > Telegram-cli version 1.3.1, Copyright (C) 2013-2015 Vitaly Valtman > ... > phone number: +49-176-38902045 > code ('call' for phone call): 73469 > User Matthias Apitz online (was online [2015/08/06 14:48:37]) > > > All done. Exit > halt The telegram-cli is NOT sending such read notifications. I installed Telegram in my iPhone and when I do send from it messages they stay with only one v (and not vv), even when I read the message with telegram-cli. When I shutdown telegram-cli and start the Telegram app in my Ubuntu mobile BQ E4.5, magically all old messages in the iPhone get the second marker v, ie have now marked vv. This is good news. matthias -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ guru@unixarea.de, http://www.unixarea.de/ ☎ +49-176-38902045 No! Nein! ¡No! Όχι! -- Ευχαριστούμε! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Aug 6 15:04:11 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3D779B4EA5 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 15:04:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF4D5F8B for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 15:04:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id CE9D29B4EA4; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 15:04:11 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE3EB9B4EA3 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 15:04:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:6601]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A70E5F8A for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 15:04:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.2]) by portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t76F4BDD012549 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 15:04:11 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild@portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org) Received: (from indexbuild@localhost) by portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id t76F4B2G012547 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 15:04:11 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 15:04:11 GMT From: Ports Index build Message-Id: <201508061504.t76F4B2G012547@portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX now builds successfully on 9.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 15:04:12 -0000 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Aug 6 16:01:56 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB0B89B58C9 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 16:01:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpm@fbsd.es) Received: from imap2-2.ox.privateemail.com (imap2-2.ox.privateemail.com [192.64.116.207]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "privateemail.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B20461C6 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 16:01:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cpm@fbsd.es) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by imap2.ox.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B06ED8C0069; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 12:01:48 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at imap2.ox.privateemail.com Received: from imap2.ox.privateemail.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (imap2.ox.privateemail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ooO15JnM00bH; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 12:01:48 -0400 (EDT) Received: from daemonlab (120.Red-83-58-115.dynamicIP.rima-tde.net [83.58.115.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by imap2.ox.privateemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A3A4C8C008A; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 12:01:44 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <1438876892.22229.3.camel@fbsd.es> Subject: Re: Telegram-cli Issues From: Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina To: Kurt Jaeger , Matthias Apitz , "aorchid@mac.com" , "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 18:01:32 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20150806112010.GE40589@home.opsec.eu> References: <1438811675.26770.4.camel@fbsd.es> <20150806105936.GA5474@c720-r276659> <20150806112010.GE40589@home.opsec.eu> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha256"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-gZloGV+i91FzZbqSX0NE" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.4 (3.16.4-2.fc22) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 16:01:56 -0000 --=-gZloGV+i91FzZbqSX0NE Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable El jue, 06-08-2015 a las 13:20 +0200, Kurt Jaeger escribi=C3=B3: > Hi! >=20 > > The Telegram protocol and clients have a feature to shown to the=20 > > sender > > when the receiver has read the message, Telegram Support calls this > > "read" status for messages and says it is an essential feature of > > Telegram. > >=20 > > I call it a violation of the receivers privacy. >=20 > 100% agreed. +1 >=20 > > It would be nice, if we (FreeBSD) could add (as a patch in the=20 > > ports > > tree) a configuration value to the telegram-cli which does not > > send such notifications when the configuration says so. > >=20 > > What do you (all and Maintainer) think about? >=20 > That would be very useful, yes. I'll take a look ASAP, but first I need to finish my pending work :) >=20 --=20 Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina PGP fingerprint =3D C60E 9497 5302 793B CC2D BB89 A1F3 5D66 E6D0 5453 --=-gZloGV+i91FzZbqSX0NE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAABCAAGBQJVw4TcAAoJEKHzXWbm0FRT6acH/jbSfwU9mxMpTQ7P8K/thurL sjvJrqNUE+3PuEqs/DtjbvW/ZUgjKSDJzH6RwUSF+BtapQgMqtW3gJ6xrdmiSCRW WO+KRuGpGGBzV5ot/JN8k5XtEW1j14qndeh+9EjB62SCaIGCP6ZYE0KtyUMOh/IG 1sn3VVGYIkXfqVHehbtoKJxViU8kIqz3DG1cCavqjTL4VViYaAUr1i5cblETXVKO zryutC+qX/VQniQduU+JcjlnjbwjmuMtpYX+RBh+OmmRjZqD931o02/pIiCBRhaH sPYBvAkId3oqVDLf+ORBR1S3hheE49QyS6VZj4tPpivlh5kUof1aZDBDIiULy5A= =JLZf -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-gZloGV+i91FzZbqSX0NE-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Aug 6 17:59:48 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0331B9B5440 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 17:59:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gahr@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE97E1D4 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 17:59:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gahr@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id DD2979B543F; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 17:59:47 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCBB39B543E for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 17:59:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gahr@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.ptrcrt.ch (ptrcrt.ch [37.252.124.203]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5116B1D3 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 17:59:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gahr@FreeBSD.org) Received: from ptrcrt.ch (mail.ptrcrt.ch [192.168.1.1]) by mail.ptrcrt.ch (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 4dd6640b TLS version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 17:53:01 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 19:53:00 +0200 From: Pietro Cerutti To: Aric Gregson Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Telegram-cli Issues Message-ID: <20150806175300.GR1490@ptrcrt.ch> Reply-To: gahr@FreeBSD.org References: <2779085.C0rFOdmndD@freeenv> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EqVOK5mkaJAMmtSx" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2779085.C0rFOdmndD@freeenv> X-PGP-Key: fp="DA6D E106 A5B8 54B8 5DD8 6D49 ADD0 D38E A192 089E"; id="0xA192089E"; get=; get=; User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 17:59:48 -0000 --EqVOK5mkaJAMmtSx Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2015-Aug-05, 11:35, Aric Gregson wrote: > Hello, >=20 > I am no longer able to make net-im/telegram-cli work. I believe this > happened when I upgraded to 10.1 some time ago. I have reinstalled the > program via portmaster several times to no avail.=20 both 1.0.5.1_1 and 1.3.1 work fine here (10.1-RELEASE-p16 amd64). --=20 Pietro Cerutti The FreeBSD Project gahr@FreeBSD.org PGP Public Key: http://gahr.ch/pgp --EqVOK5mkaJAMmtSx Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVw578XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXREQTZERTEwNkE1Qjg1NEI4NUREODZENDlB REQwRDM4RUExOTIwODlFAAoJEK3Q046hkgieCykP/RobHsZpB2sOI0Cnym9lUO+4 NzSki94o7yTa3YF+6mwvaInXrWTBt+xwGJ8eivqL/jiZTdJIhL3e7aCKxDrzvU1i KmF2ks6l3iZ8Bzf+wUXY8NhOlOnn6pIa4+pB5IAMxrTflS9NOWyF7O2OjKb3XdkV JdWz+BUh8EZ3kb7yrZ10tEMs7RD7sP3npvoKmx645GlNo0Mr3et0enYoM9yXlP3Q +5yjaE8p8+e6Oj/ZVagkjROIxaD6WpsNLdhhSX4Lns/INxQDzPJoXoLwrbk++LPj xwG9571TV+0f+nSy7IID/kJgKGbBun+T25UPUWuAsRCpG2tCTRfqlSsNzWyqES1Y 7+YlE8hHvt+lTMsmy21MQrtD5WV/kTmglgXRUKABYRC13AFJgyOWs0jd4sTtKdOg UVh0AC9au0CDU+J3/ombDcd9YVxVp+vKzpIybTlM5/e3LnHe1jmDi4fUtnU02nR0 EMXAWV1bCiZSYH2BrTAfYiTQSSqJWhWhLCg3sBVjuntYrTjvdIRN56PAPoT0Bt3y ojthLEI8XqBtQBVkTKY7KyoQNbn/WhJQay4IovGDU4GtsEtRQjw8HSjnRpc8nd8s Ds3+MQnpWD/BzJ9ZIJOf+RpEJBTSmk79aKx2RZbDcEyuLPcp+l2mqwf5XUJjCdm6 gEevqmlaNCYun0fpT9Pu =BRAT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --EqVOK5mkaJAMmtSx-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Aug 6 18:10:41 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 801D69B56F1 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 18:10:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 42E2AB1D for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 18:10:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from [82.113.98.222] (helo=localhost.unixarea.de) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1ZNPcj-0005y0-IB; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 20:10:37 +0200 Received: from localhost.my.domain (c720-r276659 [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.unixarea.de (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t76IAai7001939 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 6 Aug 2015 20:10:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t76IAaiw001938; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 20:10:36 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 20:10:35 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: "Sergey V. Dyatko" Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: skype ports status and expectations Message-ID: <20150806181035.GA1908@c720-r276659> Reply-To: Matthias Apitz Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , "Sergey V. Dyatko" , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <201507301539.t6UFdrrp003177@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> <20150731095124.689a8d61@laptop.minsk.domain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20150731095124.689a8d61@laptop.minsk.domain> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT r269739 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 82.113.98.222 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 18:10:41 -0000 El día Friday, July 31, 2015 a las 09:51:24AM +0300, Sergey V. Dyatko escribió: > I'm using FreeBSD-CURRENT (amd64) + net-im/skype4. All works fine (I hope). > http://gyazo.com/258a43fcb34ea384482800fa3d3de464 Could you please share the SVN rev. of your CURRENT or the output of 'uname -a'. Thanks matthias -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ guru@unixarea.de, http://www.unixarea.de/ ☎ +49-176-38902045 No! Nein! ¡No! Όχι! -- Ευχαριστούμε! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Aug 6 19:13:53 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E7469B54B4 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 19:13:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from teparybean2.exetel.com.au (teparybean2.exetel.com.au [220.233.0.94]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DE921177 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 19:13:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from phasia.kd.net.au ([220.233.10.47]) by teparybean2.exetel.com.au with esmtp (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1ZNQLc-0007wz-K1 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 07 Aug 2015 04:57:00 +1000 Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org (unknown [120.146.8.15]) by dermis.kd (Postfix) with ESMTP id C27CFCDAB for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 04:56:59 +1000 (EST) Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t76Iutpa074576 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 04:56:58 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from localhost (dave@localhost) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) with ESMTP id t76IusFB074573 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 04:56:55 +1000 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) X-Authentication-Warning: aneurin.horsfall.org: dave owned process doing -bs Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 04:56:54 +1000 (EST) From: Dave Horsfall To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: Telegram-cli Issues In-Reply-To: <20150806105936.GA5474@c720-r276659> Message-ID: References: <1438811675.26770.4.camel@fbsd.es> <20150806105936.GA5474@c720-r276659> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) X-Home-Page: http://www.horsfall.org/ X-Witty-Saying: "chmod 666 the_mode_of_the_beast" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 19:13:53 -0000 On Thu, 6 Aug 2015, Matthias Apitz wrote: > The Telegram protocol and clients have a feature to shown to the sender > when the receiver has read the message, Telegram Support calls this > "read" status for messages and says it is an essential feature of > Telegram. > > I call it a violation of the receivers privacy. Just to go a little OT here, I once used one of those office all-in-one systems known as OfficePower (and at least one list member here is aware of it; hi Peter!). Anyway, it had this annoying "feature" called "View Ack", but at least you were warned about it, but worse, the sender was notified that you refused to view it. Well, me being me, I sort of viewed this as a gross violation of my privacy, but this was the 80s after all, when marketoids and middle managers were rampant (and I still loathe both species). A cow-orker came to my aid, and he showed me how to edit the message to remove the "View Ack" flag (I think I still have that script somewhere) so that it could be read safely; thanks, MikB. -- Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer." Watson never said: "I think there is a world market for maybe five computers." From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Aug 6 19:23:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5336B9B58F2 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 19:23:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mizhka@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lb0-x230.google.com (mail-lb0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c04::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF81616ED for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 19:23:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mizhka@gmail.com) Received: by lbbtg9 with SMTP id tg9so10751716lbb.1 for ; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 12:23:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=42J5tB9WhIeC9tmF3sTXxBmBCPKOmOekAMRWQBuiQus=; b=sCBapYIKK54qTJInaYbS014d7D6khiEVzAXom9cQRIqJ3r0TQurbGLeAtXIJx7biKx LdfEe4M53d4cLrX5+HzVFXtTrXGKXQlGBH848mgpMGsknh83ihPEH531f8pwLwT1Mowj TfnACHQ0LB6j8PzTmRMKTNUanfRlHSTM+JjH33phSS6isgmF/BjJVDS84eBJ9QvvzlZr MIolZ4oWM0ohgUufFH1/+DL/yXohjMGdU76GJ89OLEGv4sJMf559+BMRI0TQEwMmzl7B Ggg6wWuKP6tKWXDhnvtUoPoP0KsrIOqjDc3QA1o7dhqt20RWbHZ+A1ucBsWRePNZ6vq0 BicA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.42.209 with SMTP id q17mr3974172lal.33.1438888982918; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 12:23:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.112.15.77 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 12:23:02 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150806181035.GA1908@c720-r276659> References: <201507301539.t6UFdrrp003177@mech-as222.men.bris.ac.uk> <20150731095124.689a8d61@laptop.minsk.domain> <20150806181035.GA1908@c720-r276659> Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 22:23:02 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: skype ports status and expectations From: Michael Zhilin To: Matthias Apitz , "Sergey V. Dyatko" , freebsd-ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 19:23:06 -0000 Here you are: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports?view=3Drevision&revision=3D389223 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D200608 __FreeBSD_version >=3D 1100075, but I don't know actual revision. In any case, you can use latest CURRENT snapshot, it will work. On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 9:10 PM, Matthias Apitz wrote: > El d=C3=ADa Friday, July 31, 2015 a las 09:51:24AM +0300, Sergey V. Dyatk= o > escribi=C3=B3: > > > I'm using FreeBSD-CURRENT (amd64) + net-im/skype4. All works fine (I > hope). > > http://gyazo.com/258a43fcb34ea384482800fa3d3de464 > > Could you please share the SVN rev. of your CURRENT or the output of > 'uname -a'. Thanks > > matthias > -- > Matthias Apitz, =E2=9C=89 guru@unixarea.de, http://www.unixarea.de/ =E2= =98=8E > +49-176-38902045 > No! Nein! =C2=A1No! =CE=8C=CF=87=CE=B9! -- =CE=95=CF=85=CF=87=CE=B1=CF=81= =CE=B9=CF=83=CF=84=CE=BF=CF=8D=CE=BC=CE=B5! > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Aug 6 20:50:22 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 65B439B506C for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 20:50:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aorchid@mac.com) Received: from erouter8.ore.mailhop.org (erouter8.ore.mailhop.org [54.187.218.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 2FC23F75 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 20:50:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aorchid@mac.com) Received: from freeenv.ad.medctr.ucla.edu (unknown [149.142.103.161]) by outbound3.ore.mailhop.org (Halon Mail Gateway) with ESMTPSA; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 20:46:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 13:49:05 -0700 From: Aric Gregson To: Carlos Jacobo Puga Medina Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: Telegram-cli Issues Message-ID: <20150806134905.3e107dbf@freeenv.ad.medctr.ucla.edu> In-Reply-To: <1438811675.26770.4.camel@fbsd.es> References: <1438811675.26770.4.camel@fbsd.es> Reply-To: aorchid@mac.com Organization: Slow Children at Play Productions X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.11.1 (GTK+ 2.24.28; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 20:50:22 -0000 OK. I am not sure what I was doing with 1.0.5.1, but I have updated to 1.3 and it is working. It appears that there have been significant changes, but all is good. Thank you very much for getting this port together. Does anyone know of a way to listen to audio in the cli? Thanks, Aric From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Aug 6 20:57:17 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AED099B519F for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 20:57:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@gmx.de) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3D2FC1646 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 20:57:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@gmx.de) Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([87.139.233.65]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MhQxO-1Z9eTD0u1q-00MZor; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 22:57:13 +0200 Subject: Re: Unable to relocate to new svn URL To: Kevin Oberman References: <20150805221752.GF1056@albert.catwhisker.org> <55C2CEA8.8050200@FreeBSD.org> Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML From: olli hauer X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <55C3CA26.60806@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 22:57:10 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:d0S1dCk5faHcfyhfTs5CbQ1mKfD6O9AHcZY0q7V6PjDGMVctsRg LtUB7jkr1GDarEJhrtyRyOUGFoyqDD9ihHPel124lBVPWp+CMF7Ua9CCPSrUt7iMSvzhqna GLYgYrU//49E+J7svPPpOc0oFlj4uGOpA0U9nZ7MApQrTCNNzH3fibiG4Xoev7T6PRyNjTI T7PNDZbeTduJItwvXNQKQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:43LzK9rGQgY=:SUBBybfpF8yXuiVfCDnYOQ xLz+zqsm5oSrnYwsLtHvsn4/S/LKS5EoFNt/gwUCsWCBFJzF8a+96vHiFDZynayVxi5Cb8G8X kKe5/o0nDWqiY9JeYX/Nk/Hs3Dm2/VllgxZpVidPKVZkttgqIXNQTGOJ3hKCq7P+MOlJz+Qsb 9pCWyUf9XcH6Ym9yNhRKcz27HZXSaExeTc2lkXG6r1ZEHndyNaDR7VE4jNNHxuh5OT11ehgTg kcEOqsO3y1u+hRZWPIh705hUl8+M7D1Hef7yBeCDBbV6aRlub0y/OeafCLMfy8l4HQ6hm6fsv z+O97M9/ru8s2PW57m+Vba5mk0pCD07JHacHXq3iOr4m2/fFLZ5AVXYsGYZTQIiC0YyqFuEmB qdrMYFY83Nx2xg5VIAvnOAYNUMGwKrp5erY2TBoea5ks/eHMXca1FyNSS9/1dapWFlZjd610m aAMc7diVBfrzhjzgDoYF9Qn5K3LPwhe7di/qpZYTEAk4rJrHpxopNK3RuyfABrDc4ZD+emkMR tNKwWyB5A2ybzqN7eGYqUUNf07KDBx7B1VLl6bLMxgzIy+G4vQDbOD0vKJlRayN0nirPRe9Zd hKIcLnErhnoE/klm/tO6ZnkkBGfH1tUCg1xeb9W3D9bXAf07ptl+SfA+XAOtdFKxxnlgwSffU 5Xh3gEyZwoTS3FmyL8xsUBBfcoE+C1ut2xDowFdLSzs5gBkrqlK5edyqsFg1gAwx556w= X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 20:57:17 -0000 On 2015-08-06 05:44, Kevin Oberman wrote: > ... > > This still leaves the issue of requiring SASL support in subversion. A note > in the handbook section on ports would help, though I'll admit that I > probably would not have found it in this case. Perhaps a note in > ports/UPDATING might be in order. At least that one was fairly easy to find > once I started looking. Hi Kevin, SASL support is not required to checkout/update src/ports/docs To see a list of client features fire the command $ svn --version svn, version 1.8.14 (r1692801) ... The following repository access (RA) modules are available: * ra_svn : Module for accessing a repository using the svn network protocol. - handles 'svn' scheme * ra_local : Module for accessing a repository on local disk. - handles 'file' scheme * ra_serf : Module for accessing a repository via WebDAV protocol using serf. - using serf 1.3.8 - handles 'http' scheme - handles 'https' scheme or on FreeBSD >= 10.x $ svnlite --version svn, version 1.8.10 (r1615264) ... The following repository access (RA) modules are available: * ra_svn : Module for accessing a repository using the svn network protocol. - handles 'svn' scheme * ra_local : Module for accessing a repository on local disk. - handles 'file' scheme * ra_serf : Module for accessing a repository via WebDAV protocol using serf. - using serf 1.3.7 - handles 'http' scheme - handles 'https' scheme -- olli From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Aug 6 23:54:36 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8B009B5C00 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 23:54:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffreybouquet@yahoo.com) Received: from nm19-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm19-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.213.162]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9BFAC147E for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 23:54:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jeffreybouquet@yahoo.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1438905269; bh=6a2lzylJbhTfO5GxWtcuF8kFmK5FERwusHLDWsr1IG0=; h=To:From:Subject:Date:From:Subject; b=dWro79ZIlTDw9L/oWok7AwggtB514mRqAmAwQmSxfeaWOBglYcRRIbA9CFTpf4MBhvSa2W8w7HgIosPuEjlyseZ/GqVnBLs9TMx18fa0X+1B48vXt4j1lLwYubt61+v6ZHbvFIG02WcrWBomyHXrv7uFKRRJQhk2mhCrSj+IMhGYj3BjEf7Qt2j7AflTs9CFAUTkfg9sPkfzGZxPWqBAqNRfFcEi7n0Un8OiK/ymVP1PBm8XCBwztMFI1/esZqK9o6/PdoxsF3+Py2SuafMZilLk1Lnx5TVXUOh7l/UEvrhEf7EZJkhi8IlStwIiJo6rZJCDD+ATY9Sai6PpaLQDOA== Received: from [98.139.170.182] by nm19.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Aug 2015 23:54:29 -0000 Received: from [68.142.230.71] by tm25.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Aug 2015 23:54:29 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp228.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 06 Aug 2015 23:54:29 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 84680.97004.bm@smtp228.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: _QT2QK8VM1ln7_RI2df7ohGqhiT7W7En_o.hAU81dvNVYSr .IMStAUYiOgev.69Lx.JIQpq2BJi9j8aUsHyKIiX4KSIA7CAI4EV3unkLRSO mRmU0y_z8MPNb6KXpzjOXtDMPGbSpRKurNmEVjgPSNUcE8KlsEiyIx9STjpi AbZoeqZyEEyRVz0..P94Cjd5GlyyfEXAIlMdTxpMkvrzAA6WLPbc_1vpP_JI blyfPFebF0UfHsMVv3ud1uxNZhKL22HiONjvupm7HDrsHGfh3rpKtkeV22GK UTo5hFVWhrirxjo7CKi6W7xNPfIPycVslb_BiSpHj5XaYaqRJ2VdIe4KCig. BTUocVv0s2ZHbTdHmKc.Cy.Um9cEOOCTQ.a7GDtE8xFgsBfipDbRtypcqIO7 .dAroP5av96tntYb450C7YZbw6ZJ1DLYJZoiJ.3_CGS8MY1z7nhzxGk9z_oj 8ChM9Ggm594IK7oiR0T10bok70cQ3pobo4vW4zZjshbkCJkSwsc3ZTvKyIe2 PdiISquFWJ54fMElpDI6AzyNMxWbu7PNk14G_ X-Yahoo-SMTP: 6IZaPQyswBAeyzp3urHRlQfBxGxx4Js3YAIn To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Jeffrey Bouquet Subject: devel/subversion staging, won't install. X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <55C3F398.5090405@yahoo.com> Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 16:54:00 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 23:54:37 -0000 I've a note in devel/subversion that it failed to install in March this year... Just then (aug 6) it again fails to install [ terse kwallet-dynamic-lib something, broken install line in built-already install-from-stage ; the relevant ?? option is deselected ]. Maybe someone knows if some option is mandatory, or something else... I've BDB, DOCS, FREEBSD_TEMPLATE, NLS, P4_STYLE_MARKERS, SERF, SVNSERVE_WRAPPER but not the maybe relevant KDE_KWALLET ... As before, reinstalled the older version using pkg. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 7 00:19:56 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 086839B451C; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 00:19:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@delphij.net) Received: from anubis.delphij.net (anubis.delphij.net [IPv6:2001:470:1:117::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "anubis.delphij.net", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEC8A1EF2; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 00:19:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@delphij.net) Received: from zeta.ixsystems.com (unknown [12.229.62.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by anubis.delphij.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 87E631CCB2; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 17:19:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=delphij.net; s=anubis; t=1438906795; x=1438921195; bh=A1qbxnKF2SNRIrvEjPQ+DzDyHuaILOO+Tj258KAWt1U=; h=Reply-To:To:From:Subject:Date; b=E7d4S1K7Nb1ffDuOFl3n4zmY+kuWcuBEj6rDHrSobQKy7Sct508feOF16L8twbimD AGjW2eOK3VDFc91BDoAOTRrvIzNcA3rMIxgiyqSFurl3/ycWvjsjqOTtn/WwDO750p QF0bbdeffF3pvquMTyFHmMTzDNLeYBvV3EsLQaUg= Reply-To: d@delphij.net To: FreeBSD ports , FreeBSD Current From: Xin Li Subject: Proposal: make portsnap generate INDEX-${OSREL:R} only by default X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Organization: The FreeBSD Project Message-ID: <55C3F9AA.4020602@delphij.net> Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 17:19:54 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="D8dfX29WMuUCogCTCf9PfLKTfcj0vOoKW" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 00:19:56 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --D8dfX29WMuUCogCTCf9PfLKTfcj0vOoKW Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="------------080605000509060308060502" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------080605000509060308060502 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, Currently the default portsnap.conf would generate INDEX-11, INDEX-10 and INDEX-9. The INDEX file is only used for searching ports, and only one (INDEX-${OSREL:R}) file is actually used. Traditionally, we create all supported INDEX-* files by default, but the only users who would benefit from this default are the ones who shares ports tree across many systems that runs different FreeBSD releases. And even in these scenario, it's likely that they would still want to tweak the configuration, as we may be creating more than needed INDEX-* files. So for simplicity and to reduce cycles wasted on everyone's system, I'd propose the attached change to head/'s portsnap.conf and similar changes to stable/9 and stable/10's portsnap.conf so that only INDEX-${OSREL:R} is created by default. Users who want additional INDEX files can uncomment the corresponding lines. Any objections/concerns? I'll commit the change if no objection is raised in a week. Cheers, --=20 Xin LI https://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or die --------------080605000509060308060502 Content-Type: text/x-patch; name="portsnap.conf.diff" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="portsnap.conf.diff" Index: etc/portsnap.conf =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D= =3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D --- etc/portsnap.conf (revision 286392) +++ etc/portsnap.conf (working copy) @@ -30,6 +30,6 @@ # REFUSE korean polish portuguese russian ukrainian vietnamese =20 # List of INDEX files to build and the DESCRIBE file to use for each -INDEX INDEX-9 DESCRIBE.9 -INDEX INDEX-10 DESCRIBE.10 +#INDEX INDEX-9 DESCRIBE.9 +#INDEX INDEX-10 DESCRIBE.10 INDEX INDEX-11 DESCRIBE.11 --------------080605000509060308060502-- --D8dfX29WMuUCogCTCf9PfLKTfcj0vOoKW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.1.6 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVw/mrAAoJEJW2GBstM+nsj5QP/iAl7TE/mwWdcl7UxYl3U9mW lhvBd0Mztdf9ub9fXGw4ihEfn2bjs7QDWDeUY3g8ONor5IyR4S3PbmcBJE52MPtt dOkDZJwdCWM8HQZu+d09JPW3L3Av54FSsLd27FnDQMHrkO5ie+Un/bNNY2LpzeKf Neqvz+igA+xgUVIzH6Ge2rMrAmC885hs/pVHM0HiFsBcaDRMrbD/SmogHcEqFRD+ NfsNnpr5QIVoPf0Ghwna4EoefmfQCKE0vJVSH6/rKxcPhp0iqVDfTkhUeadycpF2 j07uuEVdLU5mg8hmFKYS3caVOnAv1NzHTHdPPfb9ssfo1qA6DrPwOt/zvNY0j5gx fUC/q8DVeu0FlWQDL3Dj+w/w6u0nzxB2K+Qg62PjxUncinEBZy6NZAx9qHUr0V9I eG7yO0R52giKxLA61eLri9rhNM+M7xnzuatE7koWgREW2qK3KgDniwHI7pGrs8UV X8MCDlpAFiu5RC6uk8KoNMuWaMK98XDBIRhHNnk8Gl8X8knTWOCspmUQUa9E+nqy YEozFXQ9Y4NRos5kLWwwwY1ZSkmXvS6ydlHLijT1Dwc7875dXUbpKi+QXVRubiCJ 8z/xrEoL9V4n25NAYWZKW1EP4MBqw/Y25yeUDAPl0OynjMMp+EmxYjaGpbsbJXr5 ZI5DMiwRBV1nPWs8s6Ll =pqJF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --D8dfX29WMuUCogCTCf9PfLKTfcj0vOoKW-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 7 03:51:55 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7FC49B322F for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 03:51:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi0-x22e.google.com (mail-oi0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 856ACD42 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 03:51:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by oio137 with SMTP id 137so47152221oio.0 for ; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 20:51:54 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=s0MvwxBhg3BWk2Mtw9VwSRQS8Gh3M7AHHNvXBAJGb78=; b=rjCAjSR/Lq+/tJdibVxR+M4pPihmu8au14W7E9yeOQmyC0CppEvHFRT47XtOB6Uh53 aKWdcvJXJnucSAmnft/lMSMmuhmm7uLcxogaBIu4cKArjacuXotL7qV5pqoaNKRJZxtD Uq1wl2x1gM8LFdgvyQ6fh9HvO5p5crYrpiMjV4hbGDDUqYg/cZD6KyLLAyyNQ5KH5JD7 Cmb1P8ggLri+Ug3bzJWr/nUPQ6WrkykFqDtDP3e7NH7mY+IeC/8KliLPxxtRZ00ybib1 Vkj1GQXdbKUbfRQdPzNVo2NfobMq6GT6jkUF70YthgtqnTbr8UzNc/jTJfaFyR0JE4sd qRBw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.188.2 with SMTP id m2mr4572334oif.59.1438919514523; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 20:51:54 -0700 (PDT) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.202.221.69 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 20:51:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <55C3CA26.60806@gmx.de> References: <20150805221752.GF1056@albert.catwhisker.org> <55C2CEA8.8050200@FreeBSD.org> <55C3CA26.60806@gmx.de> Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 20:51:54 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: edfQ6t3nzj8cvB9j1CFwvdWu1_o Message-ID: Subject: Re: Unable to relocate to new svn URL From: Kevin Oberman To: olli hauer Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 03:51:55 -0000 On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 1:57 PM, olli hauer wrote: > On 2015-08-06 05:44, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > ... > > > > This still leaves the issue of requiring SASL support in subversion. A > note > > in the handbook section on ports would help, though I'll admit that I > > probably would not have found it in this case. Perhaps a note in > > ports/UPDATING might be in order. At least that one was fairly easy to > find > > once I started looking. > > Hi Kevin, > > SASL support is not required to checkout/update src/ports/docs > > To see a list of client features fire the command > > $ svn --version > svn, version 1.8.14 (r1692801) > ... > The following repository access (RA) modules are available: > > * ra_svn : Module for accessing a repository using the svn network > protocol. > - handles 'svn' scheme > * ra_local : Module for accessing a repository on local disk. > - handles 'file' scheme > * ra_serf : Module for accessing a repository via WebDAV protocol using > serf. > - using serf 1.3.8 > - handles 'http' scheme > - handles 'https' scheme > > > or on FreeBSD >= 10.x > > $ svnlite --version > svn, version 1.8.10 (r1615264) > ... > The following repository access (RA) modules are available: > > * ra_svn : Module for accessing a repository using the svn network > protocol. > - handles 'svn' scheme > * ra_local : Module for accessing a repository on local disk. > - handles 'file' scheme > * ra_serf : Module for accessing a repository via WebDAV protocol using > serf. > - using serf 1.3.7 > - handles 'http' scheme > - handles 'https' scheme > > > -- > olli > I have been running subversion for years without SASL using svn scheme with no issues, but when I issued the command "svn relocate svn://svn0.us-west https://svn", I got an error that the format of the new location was unsupported. I changed the config for subversion to add SASL support and reinstalled it. Then it worked except for failing to authenticate the cert. (I don't have the exact message any longer.) Since the only thing that changed between the failure and success was the change of adding SASL support, it sure looked like it was needed. Now that I have certs installed into /etc/ssl, the version without SASL is working. I wonder if the lack of certs caused serf to throw the error, but adding SASL allowed https to be accepted and got it to almost work. In any case, I just moved my /usr/src to https://svn with no SASL module installed but the certs in place and it worked fine. -- Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 7 04:11:37 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C499B3690; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 04:11:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi0-x233.google.com (mail-oi0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD28514D6; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 04:11:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by oiev193 with SMTP id v193so19764441oie.3; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 21:11:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=e3omizlpslOGkwN0vh/PmAbEFLuiqbm+xdCn2+I0+K0=; b=E/FO190BujtV6jHnASsjoznffjffMSVqeLOvcLKLsdsIQ9rljZpKKkxGHCo5QIu1GB 3wy57Aq7rNUajOyOl3uYYZeBANX6vjFduCS2+sedoH8xyQUWUAJh45rigVh2euRVQw1n /xmvkvB21soqcejQbJHfrtrFAouPGF2ILNyZNqcCjP1w4EcVpBw/qk1sBPcTtlgh4NWa kDw1S+bWNdZZxuvL17ANVFtgVf2+xJH5fFWpumWsu29NbxPbQ0xncyAE+UKQ5DtyBdyK X5EZ/fs7gp3s27cAQexGky9rVxCc2eh+HhBvpYjy+SBhNDtwYaAnywZ3gqH2rd06AtxH oLyA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.169.215 with SMTP id s206mr4575494oie.71.1438920695456; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 21:11:35 -0700 (PDT) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.202.221.69 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 21:11:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <55C3F9AA.4020602@delphij.net> References: <55C3F9AA.4020602@delphij.net> Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 21:11:35 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: F0N91mQArjZrsG-BvMZrjOAKARI Message-ID: Subject: Re: Proposal: make portsnap generate INDEX-${OSREL:R} only by default From: Kevin Oberman To: Xin LI Cc: FreeBSD ports , FreeBSD Current Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 04:11:37 -0000 On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Xin Li wrote: > Hi, > > Currently the default portsnap.conf would generate INDEX-11, INDEX-10 > and INDEX-9. The INDEX file is only used for searching ports, and only > one (INDEX-${OSREL:R}) file is actually used. > > Traditionally, we create all supported INDEX-* files by default, but the > only users who would benefit from this default are the ones who shares > ports tree across many systems that runs different FreeBSD releases. > And even in these scenario, it's likely that they would still want to > tweak the configuration, as we may be creating more than needed INDEX-* > files. > > So for simplicity and to reduce cycles wasted on everyone's system, I'd > propose the attached change to head/'s portsnap.conf and similar changes > to stable/9 and stable/10's portsnap.conf so that only INDEX-${OSREL:R} > is created by default. Users who want additional INDEX files can > uncomment the corresponding lines. > > Any objections/concerns? I'll commit the change if no objection is > raised in a week. > > Cheers, > -- > Xin LI https://www.delphij.net/ > FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or die > Isn't rebuilding the index useful for people running STABLE? I assume that I need a current index to get useful output from "pkg version -vL=". I am probably a bit unusual in that I keep a current ports tre on a STABLE system, but there are a couple of ports that I need to build due to custom options and I find poudriere overkill for this case. I suspect many people running STABLE may use portsnap and build everything from ports. (This use to be common fairly recently and likely still is.) Or, am I missing the obvious... something I seem to do too often these days. -- Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 7 05:08:07 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D68889B4579; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 05:08:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@dyslexicfish.net) Received: from dyslexicfish.net (deadcat.mail.dyslexicfish.net [45.63.12.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91F5D81E; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 05:08:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@dyslexicfish.net) Received: from dyslexicfish.net (deadcat.mail.dyslexicfish.net [45.63.12.202]) by dyslexicfish.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t774wiax073665; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 05:58:44 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie@dyslexicfish.net) Received: (from jamie@localhost) by dyslexicfish.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id t774wiqp073664; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 05:58:44 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie) From: Jamie Landeg-Jones Message-Id: <201508070458.t774wiqp073664@dyslexicfish.net> Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 05:58:44 +0100 To: rkoberman@gmail.com, d@delphij.net Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Proposal: make portsnap generate INDEX-${OSREL:R} only by default References: <55C3F9AA.4020602@delphij.net> In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (dyslexicfish.net [45.63.12.202]); Fri, 07 Aug 2015 05:58:44 +0100 (BST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 05:08:07 -0000 Kevin Oberman wrote: > Isn't rebuilding the index useful for people running STABLE? I assume that > I need a current index to get useful output from "pkg version -vL=". I am > probably a bit unusual in that I keep a current ports tre on a STABLE > system, but there are a couple of ports that I need to build due to custom > options and I find poudriere overkill for this case. I suspect many people > running STABLE may use portsnap and build everything from ports. (This use > to be common fairly recently and likely still is.) I run stable, and compile from source with a current ports tree on all my machines too. But... > Or, am I missing the obvious... something I seem to do too often these days. ... maybe I'm missing something that you haven't missed, which is more likely! : I've already altered my portsnap.conf to only produce INDEX-10, and from what I can gather, this is basically what Xin Li is proposing becomes the default..., i.e. only produce INDEX-9 for 9.X, INDEX-10 for 10.X and INDEX-11 for 11.X Isn't it the case that the index required is 'tuned' to the dependencies each port requires based on base software (e.g. the index file on 10.X upwards won't list a dependency on converters/libiconv) so even if you portsnap your ports tree, it's still INDEX-10 you'd require on a FreeBSD-10.X machine..? Cheers, Jamie From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 7 05:24:58 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A2609B49DF; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 05:24:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ob0-x236.google.com (mail-ob0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22E6AFF7; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 05:24:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by obdeg2 with SMTP id eg2so72064170obd.0; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 22:24:57 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=vG3qi9sSNO2X8iHKCyH/PZShgL/v3ZFDp+ibnfeHh2c=; b=aqW0XSrGY38mAmY6dS+GAhSc4O5cHX9vB//TmZSG+nZb8mAOEeJ8YBSotw+W250ple yDIIxd5m78idDZ74yhBFvRZaJ48ilYbxTS4VA6vXrtjk81Fu38qRrgr4Y2Ro00RozIvB oqyk3sJHCBKh0RXB2mWLXzxugvFNzBsrz7y7wrq+DRGxM56zBe7UndnEjgTc+7dAaZAN Jv3+nIhpc9EdEHLeYWFBnu6/BKylG/CXlG6FGLnqyaEvNOe0NVdMxQrkWuMCsqok3goH 6tNBuU9HIE5TvupZ5F5Nqw5Hxx8PgVM7cJCXBwhh9ofBHX0lu1y8uI4O9978aL41CbO3 DEnw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.182.97.10 with SMTP id dw10mr5163070obb.60.1438925097337; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 22:24:57 -0700 (PDT) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.202.221.69 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 22:24:57 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <201508070458.t774wiqp073664@dyslexicfish.net> References: <55C3F9AA.4020602@delphij.net> <201508070458.t774wiqp073664@dyslexicfish.net> Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 22:24:57 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: PZN9DJD1_u-_IFUSUcvJa-ObQmQ Message-ID: Subject: Re: Proposal: make portsnap generate INDEX-${OSREL:R} only by default From: Kevin Oberman To: Jamie Landeg-Jones Cc: Xin LI , FreeBSD Ports ML , FreeBSD Current Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 05:24:58 -0000 On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 9:58 PM, Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote: > Kevin Oberman wrote: > > > Isn't rebuilding the index useful for people running STABLE? I assume > that > > I need a current index to get useful output from "pkg version -vL=". I am > > probably a bit unusual in that I keep a current ports tre on a STABLE > > system, but there are a couple of ports that I need to build due to > custom > > options and I find poudriere overkill for this case. I suspect many > people > > running STABLE may use portsnap and build everything from ports. (This > use > > to be common fairly recently and likely still is.) > > I run stable, and compile from source with a current ports tree on all my > machines too. > > But... > > > Or, am I missing the obvious... something I seem to do too often these > days. > > ... maybe I'm missing something that you haven't missed, which is more > likely! : > > I've already altered my portsnap.conf to only produce INDEX-10, and from > what I > can gather, this is basically what Xin Li is proposing becomes the > default..., > i.e. only produce INDEX-9 for 9.X, INDEX-10 for 10.X and INDEX-11 for 11.X > > Isn't it the case that the index required is 'tuned' to the dependencies > each > port requires based on base software (e.g. the index file on 10.X upwards > won't > list a dependency on converters/libiconv) so even if you portsnap your > ports > tree, it's still INDEX-10 you'd require on a FreeBSD-10.X machine..? > > Cheers, > Jamie > Yes, I was missing the obvious. I am a bit concerned about some edge cases involving system upgrades. Of course, if everyone follows recommendation and rebuilds all ports after a major version upgrade, it should work fine. Or the code in portsnap could be modified to get the current running version. This would need to be an option that could be turned off for the few people who actually need more than one index file. Still, looks like a good idea to me! -- Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 7 05:45:43 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1365E9B4E38; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 05:45:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@delphij.net) Received: from anubis.delphij.net (anubis.delphij.net [IPv6:2001:470:1:117::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "anubis.delphij.net", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF342A00; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 05:45:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@delphij.net) Received: from Xins-MBP.home.us.delphij.net (unknown [IPv6:2601:646:8f00:8a91:196c:62ba:423f:8c79]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by anubis.delphij.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 409BC1C166; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 22:45:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=delphij.net; s=anubis; t=1438926342; x=1438940742; bh=3jBumI/CyIhdMc3iD71q2V1FqExzMH5WDr7NGyoJmQA=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=rzQD2nvrDdpMh1UwASyIz2nPr4uKqU1xlnxm1YUOPcUyX5gKm/AgqAqgn5opPre0G lVAOJQ0ybLkIxlYr+0Vrrwqb808tQPlO6T+2ph3Z6pqLt/XNTNi2kDf5R9oi8SeH7h WM7+7AtqLcE2eC8kgdCAK2u5uIZqYa2eJDRMd7/Y= Subject: Re: Proposal: make portsnap generate INDEX-${OSREL:R} only by default To: Kevin Oberman , Jamie Landeg-Jones References: <55C3F9AA.4020602@delphij.net> <201508070458.t774wiqp073664@dyslexicfish.net> Cc: Xin LI , FreeBSD Ports ML , FreeBSD Current From: Xin Li Message-ID: <55C44605.1040004@delphij.net> Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 22:45:41 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 05:45:43 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 8/6/15 22:24, Kevin Oberman wrote: > Or the code in portsnap could be modified to get the current > running version. I thought about this today but it won't work as advertised: someone (currently me) still have to tweak the portsnap builder configuration to announce new major version (9, 10, 11 now, and we would need 12 when 11.0-STABLE appears). However, freebsd-update or mergemaster would take care for this. Cheers, -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVxEYEAAoJEJW2GBstM+ns6wkP/AoQS/GX6RfJ0r5KBzHJzo1Z 1sFGkqULBYbiS4DNV8Svt1+mMdg0IwK7t5vYhkiQI/RrkeddvU1btDiVPjNGbC3K Wm5wKAD2uMRLczz9EhKCZehDRq88ckvUMefPdT5R3b+DTo4VKdCXoPC4AqZnu7bb 60wnOL6cyKw8fwKTHhVyui6zcbg9uj7VtGj9MGK+03jHDmekJ6sXZO/0fp/TGju6 ruPVf9yImi9o/T5IUaKlj2D3xfDtwEhjI7Q96K4C5y88Tl5+PXQBh/07SQOKIu59 nalLbAH8eoxITWEAOBFjM/e1KOLH5Hyk+TfR0GXDZVLyL4mi8eIpch0eLFHp3e94 PEbsE1lUN3R3/4IFTmPDj1WYF9dE/AUgV4gzQKBboieVYNLfuL/esI0VOCFa/3r3 3rSW9RAj8MOH3GA3un14eUrWg5prvDcjMq9cJUO5Pebc3cD0CxlKCJ+yNAMlTo4Q 07u8dxBXsZcO//xknW5Gx9rKl+fJxvwy2klLmsiR3+bM2PCd1bt4bvSkOTgv1ZOt qJZ4g/sDpF2jx3UYj2PF5vnBLkI6RrWer379q8ZqAwVRGE4Z9glnzo9BNUpQoQDy PXzf3Nsj/qWkvnXXIWxI71rLTsKNejiXpBiYYjZV2eYz9dCveNJEMRFmHQ+xthHz VrdB3J9EBHa17p5Xlt2y =nN8J -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 7 06:56:31 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 376209B5D30; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 06:56:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erwin@mail.droso.net) Received: from mail.droso.net (koala.droso.dk [213.239.220.246]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EFA4A1929; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 06:56:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from erwin@mail.droso.net) Received: by mail.droso.net (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 645AA218C9; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 08:56:21 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 08:56:21 +0200 From: Erwin Lansing To: d@delphij.net Cc: FreeBSD ports , FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: Proposal: make portsnap generate INDEX-${OSREL:R} only by default Message-ID: <20150807065621.GX63119@droso.dk> Mail-Followup-To: d@delphij.net, FreeBSD ports , FreeBSD Current References: <55C3F9AA.4020602@delphij.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="NEaRsfQExFH3jWtg" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55C3F9AA.4020602@delphij.net> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD/amd64 9.3-RELEASE-p5 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 06:56:31 -0000 --NEaRsfQExFH3jWtg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 05:19:54PM -0700, Xin Li wrote: > Hi, >=20 > Currently the default portsnap.conf would generate INDEX-11, INDEX-10 > and INDEX-9. The INDEX file is only used for searching ports, and only > one (INDEX-${OSREL:R}) file is actually used. >=20 This is default behaviour for other tools like fetchindex already. It makes no sense to have all INDEXes installed on all systems for almost all users, so I'm all for it. The few corner cases can, say someone building packages for different releases, can be easily scripted around (or recommend poudriere). Erwin --NEaRsfQExFH3jWtg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEVAwUBVcRWlFF75hSlwe7HAQrYWAf9GCf5IRISB1uGrC815C6ETG2Yjo0rHwVQ oENvwdlH0Aug/MVqKYWN2sLocG6jlmVspl9MBsEBm0tQXlRpFITnlzY/KsTNVXbr cDuVQT5w3E10SAi+VnaNLPHRW/8G1T0KhkNFeXZBmm+keiPnCbSuQMhSYpX4uoJf W/vXxji/DnuErUvziC0umAtDnaNXlD8GxDfpHNB84wrLbepi7TI3hvaoA/DlWKfc kqZbNJJ+9GszByjiLGoVkGSPDFyEJ8qhVlmrKQqwMOIS84T+j99hQnK8iwMypq2g 8fPwjLJ8PBJUmydRfg88SK4bMpRfRW/O9doPkwq9Pnw1pmDd51/i3w== =2/cG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --NEaRsfQExFH3jWtg-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 7 10:22:44 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C37D79B5565 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 10:22:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADC101EBB for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 10:22:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id ACD579B5561; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 10:22:44 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC7C49B5560 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 10:22:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E20F1EBA for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 10:22:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t77AMimQ002369 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 10:22:44 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id t77AMioi002368; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 10:22:44 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201508071022.t77AMioi002368@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 10:22:44 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 10:22:44 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ archivers/rvm | 1.07 | 1.11 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ science/psychopy | 1.82.01 | 1.82.02 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 7 15:51:28 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 379D89B6CCE; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 15:51:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@dyslexicfish.net) Received: from dyslexicfish.net (deadcat.mail.dyslexicfish.net [45.63.12.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC513973; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 15:51:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@dyslexicfish.net) Received: from dyslexicfish.net (deadcat.mail.dyslexicfish.net [45.63.12.202]) by dyslexicfish.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t77FopcB076129; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 16:50:51 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie@dyslexicfish.net) Received: (from jamie@localhost) by dyslexicfish.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id t77Fopdf076128; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 16:50:51 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie) From: Jamie Landeg-Jones Message-Id: <201508071550.t77Fopdf076128@dyslexicfish.net> Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:50:50 +0100 To: rkoberman@gmail.com, jamie@dyslexicfish.net, delphij@delphij.net Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, d@delphij.net Subject: Re: Proposal: make portsnap generate INDEX-${OSREL:R} only by default References: <55C3F9AA.4020602@delphij.net> <201508070458.t774wiqp073664@dyslexicfish.net> <55C44605.1040004@delphij.net> In-Reply-To: <55C44605.1040004@delphij.net> User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (dyslexicfish.net [45.63.12.202]); Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:50:51 +0100 (BST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 15:51:28 -0000 Xin Li wrote: > On 8/6/15 22:24, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > Or the code in portsnap could be modified to get the current > > running version. > > I thought about this today but it won't work as advertised: someone > (currently me) still have to tweak the portsnap builder configuration > to announce new major version (9, 10, 11 now, and we would need 12 > when 11.0-STABLE appears). However, freebsd-update or mergemaster > would take care for this. I was going to suggest this too. Isn't this information available using /bin/freebsd-version -u ? Yes, I realise this script basically has it hardcoded, but it seems, therefore, that someone already has the task to announce new major version in that file! Cheers! Jamie From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 7 16:04:53 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FBB89B6FFB; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 16:04:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@delphij.net) Received: from anubis.delphij.net (anubis.delphij.net [IPv6:2001:470:1:117::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "anubis.delphij.net", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18B819F; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 16:04:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from delphij@delphij.net) Received: from zeta.ixsystems.com (unknown [12.229.62.2]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by anubis.delphij.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 37A3B1CA3F; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 09:04:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=delphij.net; s=anubis; t=1438963492; x=1438977892; bh=QJJvogAmQl78BPnQ9W+xM/QR/ELI8yZilbX6J1NXFjA=; h=Reply-To:Subject:References:To:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To; b=v2b4La4yKWi6VJo4+eS7QHenVMzWvSS+JS5baPkTnp6mZifUIBNnExVUNo5yeBabZ p5r+Z6SeUHaFWAlChsozcyynai/5gWmVpdWd81UaLlhLyrT5MMFCHZNNu0c29/ZE5W S+BevB+Ut4B88QYQDdX0joM5l3ZkQzxKW6VMkDQ8= Reply-To: d@delphij.net Subject: Re: Proposal: make portsnap generate INDEX-${OSREL:R} only by default References: <55C3F9AA.4020602@delphij.net> <201508070458.t774wiqp073664@dyslexicfish.net> <55C44605.1040004@delphij.net> <201508071550.t77Fopdf076128@dyslexicfish.net> To: Jamie Landeg-Jones , rkoberman@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, d@delphij.net From: Xin Li Organization: The FreeBSD Project Message-ID: <55C4D723.3070102@delphij.net> Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 09:04:51 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201508071550.t77Fopdf076128@dyslexicfish.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:04:53 -0000 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 08/07/15 08:50, Jamie Landeg-Jones wrote: > Xin Li wrote: > >> On 8/6/15 22:24, Kevin Oberman wrote: >>> Or the code in portsnap could be modified to get the current >>> running version. >> >> I thought about this today but it won't work as advertised: >> someone (currently me) still have to tweak the portsnap builder >> configuration to announce new major version (9, 10, 11 now, and >> we would need 12 when 11.0-STABLE appears). However, >> freebsd-update or mergemaster would take care for this. > > I was going to suggest this too. Isn't this information available > using /bin/freebsd-version -u ? Client side: yes. Server side: someone has to tell the server to start building for new - -CURRENT or stop building for old -STABLE. Cheers, - -- Xin LI https://www.delphij.net/ FreeBSD - The Power to Serve! Live free or die -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.1.6 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJVxNcgAAoJEJW2GBstM+ns2HQP/iQfmSjJ853Aj4Bs+0qed7Ya UoE4LDaX1PJSIpqswyWir34mSgqZ5jHC8wuEkNrT3dlXaSnuxBmjvZfm23T/AUFH 9b/ytjJGlZWT0Db88AOnIeiMKKKX786m9mkDxiY2C747Q0L+KqLzQx6Ltrgl7DEm 9arRlB3nQcix9u7badVgP+B3CRfspUwtqmL9m+4LFIlJQA3OPsMxySdKoJlCQD8H E1rJNV/6NOxIIX2Y+/6EBhtNnhQwbXyKT74B/4UKFaGNaKfw7XIjB5T4yGBaWhPL 4VXqzDRU2g0YGY8VM3/uXA3AfSVuVYi9kmm2R3W/91TFwOVqGH31OQQczeK78Gpn dx8+kOfC7OLGWaQ9Xb9H3bNcPUknRuUVusb4+Wbe8qXk5cWfeyIJLTK7GC4Vvq4i dGf+rYpEMls/0t+W+6e1re+XTlZtgepLfWQMuuhCbOQf8egKktClbJ++Th6krc1B Aob62BmfgNgq4mS8t21Ee2heBTTrjNwp+openjPv9+ffvhmDngshNrdp+z4umQ3G uryURepM9YYmrRWVmD9ZOei81R2QIpzdFh/Xv4w8bwTAoiV3oJfNIavbJWuhsEsk sAKU2Kk0oBiTDwOqe4ZEVfF1HWbOZe6X6gBWjwO0f/RG7Rtn9pexU9TRzBL1SmeE qUix6Wbx6VfCB+7QiQgg =LDxP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 7 16:33:31 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D25109B4780; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 16:33:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@dyslexicfish.net) Received: from dyslexicfish.net (deadcat.mail.dyslexicfish.net [45.63.12.202]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9A0A06C1; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 16:33:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jamie@dyslexicfish.net) Received: from dyslexicfish.net (deadcat.mail.dyslexicfish.net [45.63.12.202]) by dyslexicfish.net (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t77GWm3F076343; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 17:32:48 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie@dyslexicfish.net) Received: (from jamie@localhost) by dyslexicfish.net (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id t77GWlGD076342; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 17:32:47 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from jamie) From: Jamie Landeg-Jones Message-Id: <201508071632.t77GWlGD076342@dyslexicfish.net> Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 17:32:47 +0100 To: rkoberman@gmail.com, jamie@dyslexicfish.net, d@delphij.net Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, d@delphij.net Subject: Re: Proposal: make portsnap generate INDEX-${OSREL:R} only by default References: <55C3F9AA.4020602@delphij.net> <201508070458.t774wiqp073664@dyslexicfish.net> <55C44605.1040004@delphij.net> <201508071550.t77Fopdf076128@dyslexicfish.net> <55C4D723.3070102@delphij.net> In-Reply-To: <55C4D723.3070102@delphij.net> User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (dyslexicfish.net [45.63.12.202]); Fri, 07 Aug 2015 17:32:48 +0100 (BST) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:33:31 -0000 Xin Li wrote: > > I was going to suggest this too. Isn't this information available > > using /bin/freebsd-version -u ? > > Client side: yes. > > Server side: someone has to tell the server to start building for new > - -CURRENT or stop building for old -STABLE. Ahhh! Gotcha! Thanks for the quick response. I'll stop bike-shedding now! Cheers, Jamie From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 7 18:07:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51DE19B5B37 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 18:07:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D2F891F for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 18:07:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from [89.204.139.12] (helo=localhost.unixarea.de) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1ZNm2i-0003B4-94; Fri, 07 Aug 2015 20:06:56 +0200 Received: from localhost.my.domain (c720-r276659 [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.unixarea.de (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t77I6sx5001730 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 7 Aug 2015 20:06:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.14.9/8.14.9/Submit) id t77I6sff001729; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 20:06:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 20:06:54 +0200 From: Matthias Apitz To: Kurt Jaeger , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: broken strings compiled-in into mutt Message-ID: <20150807180654.GA1695@c720-r276659> Reply-To: Matthias Apitz Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , Kurt Jaeger , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20150804181155.GA2043@c720-r276659> <20150804194824.GC40589@home.opsec.eu> <20150807175142.GA60343@mars.cert.siemens.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20150807175142.GA60343@mars.cert.siemens.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT r269739 (i386) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 89.204.139.12 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 18:07:06 -0000 El día Friday, August 07, 2015 a las 07:51:42PM +0200, Schweigert, Udo escribió: > According to the mutt mailinglist: Yes, I know; because I nailed it down and sent it to the mutt' mailinglist :-) > it's an issue with sed. No, it's not an issue with sed itself, but with the usage of sed by someone which is not portable. Just to make sure. > By copying > attached file as "files/patch-txt2c.sh" to the mutt port fixes it. I will > submit an port-update in the next couple of days which also fixes other > issues. Fine. matthias -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ guru@unixarea.de, http://www.unixarea.de/ ☎ +49-176-38902045 No! Nein! ¡No! Όχι! -- Ευχαριστούμε! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 7 18:08:14 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 566889B5B7C for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 18:08:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from udo.schweigert@siemens.com) Received: from thoth.sbs.de (thoth.sbs.de [192.35.17.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "thoth.sbs.de", Issuer "savelogs.saacon.net" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 076599BE for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 18:08:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from udo.schweigert@siemens.com) Received: from mail1.siemens.de (mail1.siemens.de [139.23.33.14]) by thoth.sbs.de (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPS id t77HphtN009462 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 7 Aug 2015 19:51:43 +0200 Received: from mars.cert.siemens.com (mars.cert.siemens.com [139.25.19.9]) by mail1.siemens.de (8.15.1/8.15.1) with ESMTPS id t77Hph2S016037 (version=TLSv1 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 7 Aug 2015 19:51:43 +0200 Received: from mars.cert.siemens.com (mars.cert.siemens.com [139.25.19.9] (may be forged)) by mars.cert.siemens.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/$SiemensCERT: trunk/mail/cert.mc.pre 6573 2013-03-29 22:52:06Z ust $) with ESMTP id t77HphL7083005; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 19:51:43 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ust@cert.siemens.de) Received: (from ust@localhost) by mars.cert.siemens.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/$SiemensCERT: trunk/mail/cert-submit.mc 7196 2014-03-25 05:41:52Z mailadm $) id t77Hpg4M048741; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 19:51:42 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ust) Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 19:51:42 +0200 From: "Schweigert, Udo" To: Kurt Jaeger , Matthias Apitz Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: broken strings compiled-in into mutt Message-ID: <20150807175142.GA60343@mars.cert.siemens.com> Mail-Followup-To: Kurt Jaeger , Matthias Apitz , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20150804181155.GA2043@c720-r276659> <20150804194824.GC40589@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150804194824.GC40589@home.opsec.eu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 18:08:14 -0000 According to the mutt mailinglist: it's an issue with sed. By copying attached file as "files/patch-txt2c.sh" to the mutt port fixes it. I will submit an port-update in the next couple of days which also fixes other issues. Udo On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 21:48:24 +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > Hello Udo (as maintainer), > > > > Maybe it's a FreeBSD issue, rather than a mutt one? > > I see similar effects on 10.1-amd64. > > Mutt 1.5.23 (2014-03-12) > Copyright (C) 1996-2009 Michael R. Elkins and others. > Mutt comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY; for details type `mutt -vv'. > Mutt is free software, and you are welcome to redistribute it > under certain conditions; type `mutt -vv' for details. > > System: FreeBSD 10.2-RC2 (amd64) > ncurses: ncurses 5.7.20081102 (compiled with 5.7) > libiconv: 1.14 > libidn: 1.31 (compiled with 1.29) > > Compiler: > F > eeBSD clang ve > sion 3.4.1 ( ags/RELEASE_34/do 1-final 208032) 20140512 > Ta > ge : x86_64-unknown-f > eebsd10.1 > Th > ead model: posix > Selec ed GCC ins alla ion: > cc: wa > ning: a > gumen unused du > ing compila ion: '-I /us > /local/include' > > Configure options: '--disable-fcn l' '--wi h-ssl=/us > ' '--wi h-docdi > =/us > /local/sha > e/doc/mu ' '--sysconfdi > =/us > /local/e c' '--enable-ex e > nal-do lock' '--enable-pop' '--enable-imap' '--disable-wa > nings' '--disable-flock' '--wi h-libiconv-p > efix=/us > /local' '--wi h-idn' '--disable-gpgme' '--enable-sm p' '--enable-debug' '--enable-comp > essed' '--disable-hcache' '--p > efix=/us > /local' '--locals a edi > =/va > ' '--mandi > =/us > /local/man' '--infodi > =/us > /local/info/' '--build=amd64-po > bld-f > eebsd10.1' 'build_alias=amd64-po > bld-f > eebsd10.1' 'CC=cc -I/us > /local/include' 'CFLAGS=-pipe -g -fs ack-p > o ec o > -fno-s > ic -aliasing' 'LDFLAGS= -L/us > /local/lib -Wl,- > pa h=/us > /local/lib:/us > /lib -l infow -Wl,- > pa h=/us > /lib:/us > /local/lib -fs ack-p > o ec o > ' 'LIBS=' 'CPPFLAGS=' 'CPP=cpp' > > Compilation CFLAGS: -pipe -g -fs ack-p > o ec o > -fno-s > ic -aliasing > > Compile options: > -DOMAIN > +DEBUG > -HOMESPOOL +USE_SETGID +USE_DOTLOCK +DL_STANDALONE -USE_FCNTL -USE_FLOCK > +USE_POP +USE_IMAP +USE_SMTP > +USE_SSL_OPENSSL -USE_SSL_GNUTLS -USE_SASL -USE_GSS +HAVE_GETADDRINFO > +HAVE_REGCOMP -USE_GNU_REGEX +COMPRESSED > +HAVE_COLOR +HAVE_START_COLOR +HAVE_TYPEAHEAD +HAVE_BKGDSET > +HAVE_CURS_SET +HAVE_META +HAVE_RESIZETERM > +CRYPT_BACKEND_CLASSIC_PGP +CRYPT_BACKEND_CLASSIC_SMIME -CRYPT_BACKEND_GPGME > -EXACT_ADDRESS -SUN_ATTACHMENT > +ENABLE_NLS -LOCALES_HACK +HAVE_WC_FUNCS +HAVE_LANGINFO_CODESET +HAVE_LANGINFO_YESEXPR > +HAVE_ICONV -ICONV_NONTRANS +HAVE_LIBIDN +HAVE_GETSID -USE_HCACHE > -ISPELL > SENDMAIL="/usr/sbin/sendmail" > MAILPATH="/var/mail" > PKGDATADIR="/usr/local/share/mutt" > SYSCONFDIR="/usr/local/etc" > EXECSHELL="/bin/sh" > -MIXMASTER > To contact the developers, please mail to . > To report a bug, please visit http://bugs.mutt.org/. > > patch-1.5.4.cd.ifdef.1 > patch-1.5.0.ats.date_conditional.1 > dgc.deepif.1 > vvv.quote > vvv.initials > rr.compressed > > -- > pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! > From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Aug 7 18:11:25 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9C8D9B5D77 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 18:11:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fc.opsec.eu (fc.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200:4::4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67A75E23 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 18:11:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@FreeBSD.org) Received: from pi by fc.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ZNm71-000LMX-Hz; Fri, 07 Aug 2015 20:11:23 +0200 Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 20:11:23 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Matthias Apitz , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Fwd: broken strings compiled-in into mutt Message-ID: <20150807181123.GA80162@fc.opsec.eu> References: <20150804181155.GA2043@c720-r276659> <20150804194824.GC40589@home.opsec.eu> <20150807175142.GA60343@mars.cert.siemens.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150807175142.GA60343@mars.cert.siemens.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 18:11:25 -0000 Hi! > According to the mutt mailinglist: it's an issue with sed. By copying > attached file as "files/patch-txt2c.sh" to the mutt port fixes it. I will > submit an port-update in the next couple of days which also fixes other > issues. Tested this patch, works. -- pi@FreeBSD.org +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Aug 8 10:12:51 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54A1F9B5929 for ; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 10:12:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E9E1914 for ; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 10:12:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 3DF999B5928; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 10:12:51 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D9EE9B5927 for ; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 10:12:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EE86913 for ; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 10:12:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t78ACph4028219 for ; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 10:12:51 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id t78ACpR0028216; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 10:12:51 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201508081012.t78ACpR0028216@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 10:12:51 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2015 10:12:51 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ multimedia/kaffeine | 1.2.2 | 1.3 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Aug 8 12:19:07 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57C2C9B6E29 for ; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 12:19:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (mx.catwhisker.org [198.144.209.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F11CF896 for ; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 12:19:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t78CIxme099914 for ; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 05:18:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david@albert.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id t78CIxd6099913 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 05:18:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 05:18:59 -0700 From: David Wolfskill To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Attempt to Upgrade firefox-39.0,1 to firefox-40.0,1 fails Message-ID: <20150808121859.GS1056@albert.catwhisker.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="l0SEZx1iikoECC+u" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2015 12:19:07 -0000 --l0SEZx1iikoECC+u Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Full typescript available in . Summary: Daily installed-ports update (using portmaster) on laptop running: FreeBSD g1-245.catwhisker.org 10.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 10.2-PRERELEASE #113 = r286399M/286408:1002500: Fri Aug 7 04:06:39 PDT 2015 root@g1-245.catw= hisker.org:/common/S1/obj/usr/src/sys/CANARY amd64 cited 2 ports to update: =3D=3D=3D>>> The following actions will be taken if you choose to proceed: Upgrade libxul-38.1.0 to libxul-38.2.0 Upgrade firefox-39.0,1 to firefox-40.0,1 The first (libxul) succeeded; the second failed; the first flagged errors I find are: =2E.. gmake[7]: Leaving directory '/common/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release= /obj-x86_64-portbld-freebsd10.2/dom/xslt/xpath' c++ -o Unified_cpp_widget2.o -c -I../dist/stl_wrappers -I../dist/system_wra= ppers -include /common/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/config/gcc_hi= dden.h -DMOZ_CROSS_PROCESS_IME -DOS_PO SIX=3D1 -DOS_FREEBSD=3D1 -DOS_BSD=3D1 -DSTATIC_EXPORTABLE_JS_API -DMOZILLA_= INTERNAL_API -DIMPL_LIBXUL -DMOZ_GLUE_IN_PROGRAM -DAB_CD=3Den-US -DNO_NSPR_= 10_SUPPORT -I/common/ports/www/firefox/work/mo zilla-release/widget -I. -I/common/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/o= bj-x86_64-portbld-freebsd10.2/ipc/ipdl/_ipdlheaders -I/common/ports/www/fir= efox/work/mozilla-release/ipc/chromium /src -I/common/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/ipc/glue -I/common/po= rts/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/dom/base -I/common/ports/www/firefox/w= ork/mozilla-release/dom/ipc -I/common/ ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/layout/base -I/common/ports/www/fire= fox/work/mozilla-release/layout/forms -I/common/ports/www/firefox/work/mozi= lla-release/layout/generic -I/common/p orts/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/layout/xul -I/common/ports/www/firefo= x/work/mozilla-release/view -I/common/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-releas= e/widget -I/common/ports/www/firefox/w ork/mozilla-release/widget/gtk -I../dist/include -I/usr/local/include/nsp= r -I/usr/local/include/nss -I/usr/local/include/nss/nss -I/usr/local/includ= e -I/usr/local/include -I/usr/local/i nclude/pixman-1 -fPIC -Qunused-arguments -isystem/usr/local/include -D= LIBICONV_PLUG -DMOZILLA_CLIENT -include ../mozilla-config.h -MD -MP -MF .d= eps/Unified_cpp_widget2.o.pp -Qunused- arguments -isystem/usr/local/include -DLIBICONV_PLUG -Qunused-arguments -W= all -Wempty-body -Woverloaded-virtual -Wsign-compare -Wwrite-strings -Wno-i= nvalid-offsetof -Wno-inline-new-delete -Wno-c++0x-extensions -Wno-extended-offsetof -Wno-unknown-warning-option -= Wno-return-type-c-linkage -O2 -pipe -O3 -DLIBICONV_PLUG -fstack-protector -= fno-strict-aliasing -DLIBICONV_PLUG -f no-exceptions -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-rtti -ffunction-sections -fdata-sec= tions -fno-exceptions -fno-math-errno -std=3Dgnu++0x -pipe -DNDEBUG -DTRIM= MED -O2 -O3 -fomit-frame-pointer -I/com mon/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/widget/gtk/compat -I/usr/local/i= nclude/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/local/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/local/include/glib-2.0= -I/usr/local/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/ usr/local/include -I/usr/local/include/cairo -I/usr/local/include/pixman-1 = -I/usr/local/include/freetype2 -I/usr/local/include/libpng16 -I/usr/local/i= nclude/libdrm -I/usr/local/include/gdk -pixbuf-2.0 -I/usr/local/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/local/include/harfbuzz -I/u= sr/local/include/gtk-unix-print-2.0 -DMESA_EGL_NO_X11_HEADERS -D_THREAD_SAF= E -pthread /common/ports/www/firefo x/work/mozilla-release/obj-x86_64-portbld-freebsd10.2/widget/Unified_cpp_wi= dget2.cpp In file included from /common/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/obj-x8= 6_64-portbld-freebsd10.2/widget/Unified_cpp_widget2.cpp:11: In file included from /common/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/widget= /nsPrintSettingsImpl.cpp:10: =2E./dist/include/mozilla/gfx/Logging.h:25:18: error: unknown type name 'PRLogModuleInfo' extern GFX2D_API PRLogModuleInfo *GetGFX2DLog(); ^ =2E./dist/include/mozilla/gfx/Logging.h:45:8: error: unknown type name 'PRLogModuleLevel' inline PRLogModuleLevel PRLogLevelForLevel(int aLevel) { ^ =2E./dist/include/mozilla/gfx/Logging.h:48:12: error: use of undeclared ide= ntifier 'PR_LOG_ERROR' return PR_LOG_ERROR; ^ =2E./dist/include/mozilla/gfx/Logging.h:50:12: error: use of undeclared ide= ntifier 'PR_LOG_WARNING'; did you mean 'LOG_WARNING'? return PR_LOG_WARNING; ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~ LOG_WARNING =2E./dist/include/mozilla/gfx/Logging.h:34:11: note: 'LOG_WARNING' declared= here const int LOG_WARNING =3D 2; ^ =2E./dist/include/mozilla/gfx/Logging.h:52:12: error: use of undeclared ide= ntifier 'PR_LOG_DEBUG'; did you mean 'LOG_DEBUG'? return PR_LOG_DEBUG; ^~~~~~~~~~~~ LOG_DEBUG =2E./dist/include/mozilla/gfx/Logging.h:35:11: note: 'LOG_DEBUG' declared h= ere const int LOG_DEBUG =3D 3; ^ =2E./dist/include/mozilla/gfx/Logging.h:54:12: error: use of undeclared ide= ntifier 'PR_LOG_DEBUG'; did you mean 'LOG_DEBUG'? return PR_LOG_DEBUG; ^~~~~~~~~~~~ LOG_DEBUG =2E./dist/include/mozilla/gfx/Logging.h:35:11: note: 'LOG_DEBUG' declared h= ere const int LOG_DEBUG =3D 3; ^ =2E./dist/include/mozilla/gfx/Logging.h:56:12: error: use of undeclared ide= ntifier 'PR_LOG_ALWAYS' return PR_LOG_ALWAYS; ^ =2E./dist/include/mozilla/gfx/Logging.h:58:10: error: use of undeclared ide= ntifier 'PR_LOG_DEBUG'; did you mean 'LOG_DEBUG'? return PR_LOG_DEBUG; ^~~~~~~~~~~~ LOG_DEBUG =2E./dist/include/mozilla/gfx/Logging.h:35:11: note: 'LOG_DEBUG' declared h= ere const int LOG_DEBUG =3D 3; ^ =2E./dist/include/mozilla/gfx/Logging.h:136:11: error: use of undeclared identifier 'PR_LOG_TEST' if (PR_LOG_TEST(GetGFX2DLog(), PRLogLevelForLevel(aLevel))) { ^ =2E./dist/include/mozilla/gfx/Logging.h:163:11: error: use of undeclared identifier 'PR_LOG_TEST' if (PR_LOG_TEST(GetGFX2DLog(), PRLogLevelForLevel(aLevel))) { ^ =2E./dist/include/mozilla/gfx/Logging.h:164:9: error: use of undeclared ide= ntifier 'PR_LogPrint' PR_LogPrint("%s%s", aString.c_str(), aNoNewline ? "" : "\n"); ^ liburiloader_prefetch.a.desc rm -f liburiloader_prefetch.a /common/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/obj-x86_64-portbld-freebsd10= =2E2/_virtualenv/bin/python /common/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/= config/expandlibs_gen.py -o liburiloader_prefetch.a.desc Unified_cpp_uriloa= der_prefetch0.o =20 =2E.. It then does some more ... stuff, then: =2E.. rm -f liblayout_generic.a /common/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/obj-x86_64-portbld-freebsd10= =2E2/_virtualenv/bin/python /common/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/= config/expandlibs_gen.py -o liblayout_ge neric.a.desc nsLineLayout.o nsPluginFrame.o Unified_cpp_layout_generic0.o U= nified_cpp_layout_generic1.o Unified_cpp_layout_generic2.o Unified_cpp_layo= ut_generic3.o =20 gmake[7]: Leaving directory '/common/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release= /obj-x86_64-portbld-freebsd10.2/layout/generic' gmake[6]: Leaving directory '/common/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release= /obj-x86_64-portbld-freebsd10.2' /common/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/config/recurse.mk:32: recipe= for target 'compile' failed gmake[5]: *** [compile] Error 2 gmake[5]: Leaving directory '/common/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release= /obj-x86_64-portbld-freebsd10.2' /common/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/config/rules.mk:538: recipe = for target 'default' failed gmake[4]: *** [default] Error 2 gmake[4]: Leaving directory '/common/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release= /obj-x86_64-portbld-freebsd10.2' /common/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/client.mk:400: recipe for ta= rget 'realbuild' failed gmake[3]: *** [realbuild] Error 2 gmake[3]: Leaving directory '/common/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release' /common/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release/client.mk:171: recipe for ta= rget 'build' failed gmake[2]: *** [build] Error 2 gmake[2]: Leaving directory '/common/ports/www/firefox/work/mozilla-release' =3D=3D=3D> Compilation failed unexpectedly. Try to set MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE=3Dyes and rebuild before reporting the failure = to the maintainer. *** Error code 1 Stop. make[1]: stopped in /common/ports/www/firefox *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /common/ports/www/firefox =3D=3D=3D>>> make build failed for www/firefox =3D=3D=3D>>> Aborting update =3D=3D=3D>>> Update for www/firefox failed =3D=3D=3D>>> Aborting update =3D=3D=3D>>> The following actions were performed: Upgrade of libxul-38.1.0 to libxul-38.2.0 =3D=3D=3D>>> You can restart from the point of failure with this command li= ne: portmaster www/firefox=20 I have my build machine working on a poudriere run (for the machines I only update weekly (tomorrow)); it may be interesting to find out if that complains about the same thing, fails in a different way, or succeeds. Peace, david --=20 David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org Those who would murder in the name of God or prophet are blasphemous coward= s. See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --l0SEZx1iikoECC+u Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVxfOzXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ4RThEMDY4QTIxMjc1MDZFRDIzODYzRTc4 QTY3RjlDOERFRjQxOTNCAAoJEIpn+cje9Bk7Ym8QAJTEq85k3THoqIiuu02JrBIX HkLrVk+KocVejCczVKSiUH7JGm6uQH6vymxaIJXMOY6/8bcMZY5uX2Lw2WBRqzmc 4XrzS7jgU7Vpq9DPHjCD9Ff67NT6fq/AHeKzG1TcRaGj/xWApzucJYYJ9VhGNkNa 2X3WgDB0fZGUDSJYvMa0wYRPq/m9jcgGOp8Q1MMfkVc6OK17AWLYRT5zbNCqqNwm Hh0wLaLXS31lIE4MOqquTsEeOnVia5yqGZfRWL82ZEibou6YbBk+r1x4nVaSyfhs 0Arhe9i0ogmUNq+1pYfBL9a1Ga+j7+2HzHl++z8vNONLmGChWlpPeg651z5kG1NY QR0FCZT69RSL6vJQ3MZIFhjLN1jYnWcu4WObMDGoomyJtrH7OKAiHQZoZmtvQ7FV wSMBai7eviv6Lsa90wrP81N70wIMDej8KBF1V9exrqSX9C4WLqxi6PZrN4gYlb4c IoGxVzSvcHIgARMsyX8yTTfHpjTXbEbb39HJQ1oLawkcu9Lp/9cL2Tn0Uugpr5ys 4HaLwHKhrVU1EzNMG2ewlHJKNtpfSj3KytrpdA47oIyQXpQh0UWRPk6TVCP8JmbP d2bbvWdSCHbXTp+Nm1p/b6XFDwaDyk/W7cU+juu9Gi87em7D8sqzksI2g+L5kZUS sWrAoGVoQFjMnGG2Cq5x =RXku -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --l0SEZx1iikoECC+u-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Aug 8 12:41:02 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DB0A9B51E8 for ; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 12:41:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (mx.catwhisker.org [198.144.209.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A9D210D5 for ; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 12:41:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t78Cf1sK000954 for ; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 05:41:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david@albert.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id t78Cf1I6000953 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 05:41:01 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 05:41:00 -0700 From: David Wolfskill To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Attempt to Upgrade firefox-39.0,1 to firefox-40.0,1 fails Message-ID: <20150808124100.GY1056@albert.catwhisker.org> References: <20150808121859.GS1056@albert.catwhisker.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FRTMFE5eVcu5AKoW" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150808121859.GS1056@albert.catwhisker.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2015 12:41:02 -0000 --FRTMFE5eVcu5AKoW Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 05:18:59AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > Full typescript available in > . >=20 > Summary: Daily installed-ports update (using portmaster) on laptop runnin= g: > ... > I have my build machine working on a poudriere run (for the machines > I only update weekly (tomorrow)); it may be interesting to find out > if that complains about the same thing, fails in a different way, > or succeeds. > .... The poudriere attempt failed in the same way; I've copied its firefox-40.0,1.log to the directory cited above. Peace, david --=20 David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org Those who would murder in the name of God or prophet are blasphemous coward= s. See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --FRTMFE5eVcu5AKoW Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJVxfjcXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ4RThEMDY4QTIxMjc1MDZFRDIzODYzRTc4 QTY3RjlDOERFRjQxOTNCAAoJEIpn+cje9Bk7y0MP/innIgeU6NyGsnkvs0wGhP9H UjUCPCkL6slT0OiSPRaQxEXUyTtWQSmtld8YAW2Km+wMD/ODdZlXX25yUVQkSNgn Cu/C/sQD7O4lEKwCgISJNJFzFQDp/FbIhO+yy3VJTRP2Hk9OEyIwU5Ec5tJsnQhh u+/iY37L1C5yX9vbt82Y0x8Q6RbSiH4NavYPvH+xZ31VCU/0aXIN5xP38ThG7A1v dtY3AjZW1fQancBY9RAdY/KZ465vN3JoQtqXjYXGvQPqJZ9g130d90OT9rkZnUsb Ya33njU6LeWwx1R/3j3tVqKCn43FN5dUKgILJd5IMo3uaH3KzLrTMPuAXUAqRR74 fWz109ryeBXQ8IMph9FNYKte05K4Nd2aDSJQiuEOJiQq/UL2YGj/YaHr1cF02ywh tw28giFzsQZw4sUPDJltDPDvTb26OnVSXxifIZR34zdX6VIM5YrUP2Ak0Bm9F/id PXP43FQ3Kzzo2vCtRYYKygYdgh3+0kVsfliAxZ2jxnyMFHgyKg5C/la2p1m2pf3q ywhqhKidNJGTOLK9zpJF9FMVjBxOB1Vbwlo91MgyuVXrqWUibmJ8SDMc8kjZAS+l vtpP3lWyuxZo7g+AI5aUVKgA/elGCwbp7DEs1JFq5sTuml6SB4CeHbHhvzyOcAwq G/qcqsheGcSPpW41AO5i =oIA0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FRTMFE5eVcu5AKoW-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Aug 8 12:51:08 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 133D49B53D1 for ; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 12:51:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mmoll@darkthrone.kvedulv.de) Received: from darkthrone.kvedulv.de (darkthrone.kvedulv.de [IPv6:2001:1578:400:101::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "darkthrone.kvedulv.de", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 Primary Intermediate Server CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C591A14A9 for ; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 12:51:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mmoll@darkthrone.kvedulv.de) Received: by darkthrone.kvedulv.de (Postfix, from userid 666) id 29CC816BC; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 14:51:03 +0200 (CEST) Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 14:51:03 +0200 From: Michael Moll To: David Wolfskill Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Attempt to Upgrade firefox-39.0,1 to firefox-40.0,1 fails Message-ID: <20150808125103.GA84155@darkthrone.kvedulv.de> References: <20150808121859.GS1056@albert.catwhisker.org> <20150808124100.GY1056@albert.catwhisker.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150808124100.GY1056@albert.catwhisker.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2015 12:51:08 -0000 Hi, On Sat, Aug 08, 2015 at 05:41:00AM -0700, David Wolfskill wrote: > The poudriere attempt failed in the same way; I've copied its > firefox-40.0,1.log to the directory cited above. See PR 202165, after enabling LOGGING it did build for me. Regards -- Michael Moll From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Aug 8 16:09:00 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A65219B6540 for ; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 16:09:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pathiaki2@yahoo.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 853BAAF3 for ; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 16:09:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pathiaki2@yahoo.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 80DF99B653D; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 16:09:00 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F6469B653B for ; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 16:09:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pathiaki2@yahoo.com) Received: from nm38-vm1.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm38-vm1.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [72.30.239.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2B083AF1 for ; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 16:09:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pathiaki2@yahoo.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1439050138; bh=2+gFjHn66gJ/FIkBg5J1Ftr1DtgWNTO8pa57opyFYIw=; h=Date:From:To:CC:Subject:From:Subject; b=eMRw+PnGI1GSPnbStErXXGVsgunmONA6JKP6H9Euny0fIFMlPYVdZhFcLqXDOTKer/fP5PczNi5mv2Kv6JaF+G8BUi9rTBEgLW+15EACbJWNv58QebtaG9UwoPZh5Q+Lcu43EBjB2Urm2AuI5RODPx36fP2xCIsVHhcRngrgl/H/cLkw+Wf6bN4gQalA6RA0OiMrZQFrL3keSt71EUWCqVAP0vvmWVgeUuHn7+8thx76tS1dEylxE4XYEzDl8AWdDBRqPiqidiVt4cvshy/FiSKYi/1NWf8y7iQepR9ZWlh5Bzve5akE45kFPL7KD+KyvYq/DC2/2ljGWHg4e7/TBw== Received: from [98.139.215.143] by nm38.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Aug 2015 16:08:58 -0000 Received: from [98.139.211.192] by tm14.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Aug 2015 16:08:58 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp201.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Aug 2015 16:08:58 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 415054.97813.bm@smtp201.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: ESPwd2EVM1mG354LwJYKXziR0qTUvw0li22ZEwQqjBssk9U ASKRwir9ZRAfmmsoJO3ReFvTHmBVw_yDE9Q1KOQxGcjPZb4iX5nEqpSWcOu_ fTWkSCOvprgN4OFXI15IGOvLUNJfJdsHyK7VhBj3X5iZpq8jvaUmyyD2VdGr mPC58pXc3YwEletaa.krLIalfUpl3dDKbxaNAybGQf7KpYBhzIoADEtRGQZh 4oCN4KVXMgReYwJ7vr.lLDGWzWswbi5y2ncdlGY4Q.gXXJKZBUN.IZw_5d3W sO54RfY7Na945CAW2Lfb5P1jFjbyMnd9T_YDR0Mw1qt0tgUh2FKsqSXf0FB. rSDZ6WNKaAxxudHmvJYk1GustqVayncgjU.7ddD2noae558zwd.kzIJhs4jt Ow6d.670kNGzMIrXnqACtPvaR8GcM0dufg9gZpyJwgLC70rnVHBnM2I0DiS5 sTnHSYeqUtOylJZVCgvzrJkevGPGwf.wOMa2BQwrgKYgIdhzRVKh9KE7UXqG x6_JSOKtU0TsHkEuESuiwh6fYWy3LIwkgxA-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: h3Xqg6.swBC0yI913RMMwp94grO_cg-- Message-ID: <55C62999.40300@yahoo.com> Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2015 12:08:57 -0400 From: Paul Pathiakis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gnome@FreeBSD.org CC: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: brasero-3.12.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2015 16:09:00 -0000 Hi, This problem exists upstream. Whether on FreeBSD or PCBSD, brasero is still looking for libdvdcss.so.2. https://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/2tky0r/brasero_doesnt_read_css_encrypted_dvds_claims/ Thank you, P. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Aug 8 17:52:52 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64E7A9B576F for ; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 17:52:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kwm@rainbow-runner.nl) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FD9C1BEA for ; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 17:52:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kwm@rainbow-runner.nl) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 4D2119B576C; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 17:52:52 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C5959B576A; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 17:52:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kwm@rainbow-runner.nl) Received: from fep33.mx.upcmail.net (fep33.mx.upcmail.net [62.179.121.51]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63B551BE7; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 17:52:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kwm@rainbow-runner.nl) Received: from edge04.upcmail.net ([192.168.13.239]) by viefep31-int.chello.at (InterMail vM.8.01.05.05 201-2260-151-110-20120111) with ESMTP id <20150808163001.HDLN23199.viefep31-int.chello.at@edge04.upcmail.net>; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 18:30:01 +0200 Received: from [192.168.1.60] ([95.96.229.21]) by edge04.upcmail.net with edge id 2GeD1r0110ULilr01GeE4a; Sat, 08 Aug 2015 18:38:14 +0200 X-SourceIP: 95.96.229.21 Message-ID: <1439051802.4375.5.camel@rainbow-runner.nl> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: brasero-3.12.1 From: Koop Mast To: Paul Pathiakis , gnome@FreeBSD.org Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2015 18:36:42 +0200 In-Reply-To: <55C62999.40300@yahoo.com> References: <55C62999.40300@yahoo.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.16.4 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2015 17:52:52 -0000 On Sat, 2015-08-08 at 12:08 -0400, Paul Pathiakis via freebsd-gnome wrote: > Hi, > > This problem exists upstream. Whether on FreeBSD or PCBSD, brasero > is > still looking for libdvdcss.so.2. > > https://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/2tky0r/brasero_doesnt_rea > d_css_encrypted_dvds_claims/ > > Thank you, > > P. Thanks for the headup, I have committed a patch I found in the upstream bug about this issue. -Koop From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Aug 8 19:09:23 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B449C9B6566 for ; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 19:09:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de (outpost1.zedat.fu-berlin.de [130.133.4.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68D8CE8 for ; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 19:09:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de) Received: from inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de ([130.133.4.69]) by outpost.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.85) for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org with esmtp (envelope-from ) id <1ZO9Ue-003z3Z-Vt>; Sat, 08 Aug 2015 21:09:20 +0200 Received: from x5ce173bd.dyn.telefonica.de ([92.225.115.189] helo=thor.walstatt.dynvpn.de) by inpost2.zedat.fu-berlin.de (Exim 4.85) for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org with esmtpsa (envelope-from ) id <1ZO9Ue-0039zN-Pn>; Sat, 08 Aug 2015 21:09:20 +0200 Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 21:09:19 +0200 From: "O. Hartmann" To: FreeBSD Ports Subject: www/firefox: 40.0 continously crashing Message-ID: <20150808210919.47a48062.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Organization: FU Berlin X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.12.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/TY00zd9=rzR_bQ3NQbjQy0u"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Originating-IP: 92.225.115.189 X-ZEDAT-Hint: A X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2015 19:09:23 -0000 --Sig_/TY00zd9=rzR_bQ3NQbjQy0u Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Since www/firefox has been updated to version 40.0, it keeps crashing errat= ically and unpredictable. Does anyone else recognise this misbehavious? Regards, oh --Sig_/TY00zd9=rzR_bQ3NQbjQy0u Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJVxlPfAAoJEOgBcD7A/5N8v3AH/j7RTqN6vrGYzCd4ld4e5xYs jpcBB3s2FQiflozKbYtKdbBa3EGY/wVvAMGn1z78+jJvgXGqJRINLNGnICGIwo01 03zfPzqrKMZD9Ak9DUm6FOgja9MryFKn+TNlCGX6HfF5U2Vr/WK9GZG69qooyzaG QJ271uY9C8pUfAXzckx6MyAa2cn1sIyOzsOBKHCyXqN54KA7ehCxT6xmV425jRGu QdfrA1Pu04wiAbzuXAMEjYAtKY39fguIEq4yUNhfffK/BrXfOY3uFeVHgkQL0dps aMNC9xjFaGdt0Ip8y+EHvBix8n3m1QaSnZ2fg6CiItF4gwKV05JPGArB9N+q494= =VZSP -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/TY00zd9=rzR_bQ3NQbjQy0u-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Aug 8 19:40:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4D2F9B6A4D for ; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 19:40:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fidaj@ukr.net) Received: from frv25.fwdcdn.com (frv25.fwdcdn.com [212.42.77.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8897810B3 for ; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 19:40:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fidaj@ukr.net) Received: from [10.10.14.27] (helo=frv158.fwdcdn.com) by frv25.fwdcdn.com QID:1ZO9go-000ADe-NG/RC:1; Sat, 08 Aug 2015 22:21:54 +0300 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ukr.net; s=fsm; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date; bh=K/Xi61LcwGOy0xjQ+YTmPcCO+43C5L2aup6GQa77BNQ=; b=QR8cl5+yD9HD9FY/N9IaEYnbwfztEbyC8NLrcmVOj3pXsZi0kA0WF/Bx8FUFMoggzfQqRQjCcq+xv2ezCSrP7A8wElILkK4dR2j0A2M1+mO7vD7LraqAz86AHa8N8J2dy5mRUpqOz2lV0i4RsxNTr2Cv/4wFw+hdGfWS3SyG8U0=; Received: from [134.249.91.180] (helo=nonamehost.local) by frv158.fwdcdn.com with esmtpsa ID 1ZO9gf-000569-GH ; Sat, 08 Aug 2015 22:21:45 +0300 Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 22:21:09 +0300 From: Ivan Klymenko To: "O. Hartmann" Cc: FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: www/firefox: 40.0 continously crashing Message-ID: <20150808222109.582c0287@nonamehost.local> In-Reply-To: <20150808210919.47a48062.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> References: <20150808210919.47a48062.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.12.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Authentication-Result: IP=134.249.91.180; mail.from=fidaj@ukr.net; dkim=pass; header.d=ukr.net X-Ukrnet-Yellow: 0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2015 19:40:59 -0000 On Sat, 8 Aug 2015 21:09:19 +0200 "O. Hartmann" wrote: > > Since www/firefox has been updated to version 40.0, it keeps crashing > erratically and unpredictable. > > Does anyone else recognise this misbehavious? > > Regards, > > oh +1 absolutely From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Aug 8 20:14:07 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE26D9B6105 for ; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 20:14:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi0-x230.google.com (mail-oi0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D599353 for ; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 20:14:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by oip136 with SMTP id 136so69314105oip.1 for ; Sat, 08 Aug 2015 13:14:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=vMYXsOU4q5TxdQqYSwsIhAXAsi+Y8st/T243oV4OnK8=; b=IGKyiPYH8pPLpwIexl1+Gd5bJsOV8yrw6Uz5m6VMFX1Z0S9b39dbIJwDJ1OrKQUCNG DEPTtJFQ2FqMqHM7ugZzjTwoxq2GSqYeY6AzojD2/BhF1AGDXXHKtCIfEWoI92KLhVe9 t3+7FDD5L/p64fRbJGJC+nzVkp4cNlmXZ13NL8ErW7Q3I37o2ScGlThbooeenrZH/TYg ++aGReJ6tB2Vzl22iicfL2Q6/H2b7vao5QG9LgQsERYPBwkp+ANLvMlacDDaoADs9q+8 91l91CIA/N8bg+OHnUNUaPSrmN7WRUzc6Dpl1gbKgTh/Whw/XpkpZdoOjq5YBs7h7ORt ydIA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.188.2 with SMTP id m2mr12489399oif.59.1439064845890; Sat, 08 Aug 2015 13:14:05 -0700 (PDT) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.202.221.69 with HTTP; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 13:14:05 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150808222109.582c0287@nonamehost.local> References: <20150808210919.47a48062.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20150808222109.582c0287@nonamehost.local> Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 13:14:05 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Kn3ssXBFU-hy_YC0Orgolv81uzI Message-ID: Subject: Re: www/firefox: 40.0 continously crashing From: Kevin Oberman To: Ivan Klymenko Cc: "O. Hartmann" , FreeBSD Ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2015 20:14:07 -0000 On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 12:21 PM, Ivan Klymenko wrote: > On Sat, 8 Aug 2015 21:09:19 +0200 > "O. Hartmann" wrote: > > > > > Since www/firefox has been updated to version 40.0, it keeps crashing > > erratically and unpredictable. > > > > Does anyone else recognise this misbehavious? > > > > Regards, > > > > oh > > +1 absolutely > > See https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202165 It has a workaround, but it needs testing. It's very near the bottom of a long ticket which starts out with a somewhat different issue. Give it a try and let the world know if it does NOT fix the issue. -- Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683