From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Sep 6 11:01:03 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 424879CB938 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2015 11:01:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D95681AAF for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2015 11:01:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from liminal.local (liminal.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3636:3bff:fed4:b0d6]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id t86B0pMa058295 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2015 12:00:53 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk t86B0pMa058295 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/t86B0pMa058295; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host liminal.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3636:3bff:fed4:b0d6] claimed to be liminal.local Subject: Re: Migrating from perl5-5.20 to perl5.22 using custom packages? To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20150905162900.GR17650@albert.catwhisker.org> From: Matthew Seaman X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <55EC1CD8.1090501@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2015 12:00:40 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150905162900.GR17650@albert.catwhisker.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="FEuLiCOPXqPmO91a9wVodS68McGN3molr" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2015 11:01:03 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --FEuLiCOPXqPmO91a9wVodS68McGN3molr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 05/09/2015 17:29, David Wolfskill wrote: > While it claimed success and exited with an exit status of 0, it says > that what it did with respect to Perl was: >=20 > perl5: 5.20.2_5 -> 5.20.2_6 >=20 > which isn't quite what I had in mind. >=20 >=20 > In checking the package repository, I see: >=20 > freebeast(10.2-S)[9] (cd All; ls -lT perl*) > -rw-r--r-- 5 nobody wheel 13746168 Aug 16 04:33:03 2015 perl5-5.20.2= _6.txz > -rw-r--r-- 5 nobody wheel 13935800 Jul 4 14:53:37 2015 perl5.18-5.1= 8.4_15.txz > -rw-r--r-- 1 nobody wheel 13958800 Sep 5 05:53:23 2015 perl5.22-5.2= 2.0_2.txz > freebeast(10.2-S)[10]=20 >=20 > I suppose a bit of housecleaning is in order... but is the existence > of the the perl5-5.20.2_6.txz the reason/excuse for not picking up > perl5.22-5.22.0_2.txz? >=20 > What do I need to do to switch to perl5.22 on my production machines? I did exactly this a week or so ago. Given you've got your own poudriere setup, then: 1) Edit /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/make.conf (or an build specific variant) and set: DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=3D perl5=3D5.22 2) Run a poudriere bulk to rebuild all the packages that depend on perl. That's going to be most of them because GNU autotools introduces a build-depends on perl through automake... 3) Upgrade packages as normal: pkg upgrade You should see pkg wanting to remove perl5.20, install perl5.22 and reinstall all perl modules or other ports with a run-time dependency on perl. Note that the default version of perl in your repo will get the pkgname 'perl5', and all others will get a pkgname of the form 'perl5.XY' -- so in my repo, I have: % pkg search -x perl5 perl5-5.22.0_2 perl5.20-5.20.2_6 ie 5.22 is the default version but I also have a (basically useless) perl5.20 package. Cheers, Matthew --FEuLiCOPXqPmO91a9wVodS68McGN3molr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJV7BzfXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATdoYP/2oYWowwixn/Iq9m97Cies05 JVYYpxmlLYMRpbbBX00qmVXXFjinNoyNy8Oj4BwaCiv5dWEW8WWBpDj6fgwqQi+j ZT8Df9g15ReMFrOb++Rvsfomy7FjbiMoblrfoj+4n5Dd9l6ZPMBSmlFGqBmQnWR0 GUrwBPGXNhVYBHAd79QoGhdataDWn4iHzif2tlWGMw6KkHsElM4yppvvaBt+ACtl boUVePWLV0BBq6n8RNhcBab4A+MvCgK9TsvDQFqnGo7tTJPkoiMwxncXcboOM1ea bY49TpDWVxK2JmMjJU1N+IFmTIPQwhTAARA3QRwLioXYDQDVLThvIlRSx0uz8FwQ 0VskDIrMIr5xoUJI0nrVdUiJSF2P8zi0r3REam6byFI+dZpx8dWenMHVgqJja2yY Q6jWMyT5AZt/vhtI6ky6H2A5vD99Ze/ht0s5ElmZrQ/Ej7U26c4S4pIGf5tJf6vP 09OHzv9r8+0/HwWgEk1MJpVQlHB9HtviTuZttjj9GZEYkpVxgq/QVEbr/MsU23bG WY2jeSOuZeAGCW5ywS9VAbBNHer0lBBb5vTnkrwSzLWFgeOYa4Y84L8BAB3dRoq8 o+E9jMYgKsLA0CfeK+51P3QnIWCDGifmRyOHcqjeLvTBnARackvtskHSUfALdZBB a9tFvXAROWR/sCxKvgNz =iVib -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --FEuLiCOPXqPmO91a9wVodS68McGN3molr-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Sep 6 13:33:48 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A67B9CBC71 for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2015 13:33:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (mx.catwhisker.org [198.144.209.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E2921E0; Sun, 6 Sep 2015 13:33:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t86DXkkA001736; Sun, 6 Sep 2015 06:33:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david@albert.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id t86DXkd5001735; Sun, 6 Sep 2015 06:33:46 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david) Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2015 06:33:46 -0700 From: David Wolfskill To: olli hauer , Matthew Seaman Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Migrating from perl5-5.20 to perl5.22 using custom packages? Message-ID: <20150906133346.GB1131@albert.catwhisker.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qcHopEYAB45HaUaB" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55EC1CD8.1090501@FreeBSD.org> <55EB41DE.7040609@gmx.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2015 13:33:48 -0000 --qcHopEYAB45HaUaB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 09:26:22PM +0200, olli hauer wrote: > ... > You can use the 'pkg set -o ...' command, but I suspect the version chang= e is not happened automatically because the default in your poudriere is no= t set to perl5.22 Thanks for the suggestion. I looked at that, and was a bit put off by the "(DEPRECATED)" warning in the pkg-set man page. Well, that, as well as the sense that I was treading in areas I understood but poorly, and if I screwed up, I could lose Internet connectivity (at home, at least) and/or the abiliity to send & receive email.... So I elected to wait a bit. > # pkg set -o lang/perl5.20:lang/perl5.22 > (note old <--> new swapped and separated with ':' ) >=20 > >From Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk: > ... > PERL5_DEFAULT?=3D 5.20 >=20 >=20 > To overwrite this in PD globally > $ cat $LOCALBASE/etc/poudriere/make.conf (or $set-make.conf, for only a d= edicated ports set) > DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=3D perl5=3D5.22 >=20 > and fire a new build, all ports depending on the default perl are reflect= ing the new 5.22 version as dependency and the perl version should change a= utomatically. > From my past experience with perl upgrades I would run 'pkg upgrade -f' e= lse not all p5-$ports are reinstalled. > And as super bonus since you are already building with PD you don't have = to mess around with portmaster Well, as I pointed out in the original note, I use portmaster on my "development" systems (which I update daily), and poudriere/pkg on the "production" systems (which I update weekly). > PS: > nice writeup on your webpage, to get a even smaller package list you can = run "ports-tools/pkg_tree" with the parameter '-t' Thanks! I merely figured I'd want to have a record of what I did, and that such a record might be of use to others (if for no other reason than to be able to avoid some of the things that I encountered). On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 12:00:40PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote: > ... > I did exactly this a week or so ago. Given you've got your own > poudriere setup, then: >=20 > 1) Edit /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/make.conf (or an build > specific variant) and set: >=20 > DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=3D perl5=3D5.22 >=20 > 2) Run a poudriere bulk to rebuild all the packages that depend on > perl. That's going to be most of them because GNU autotools > introduces a build-depends on perl through automake... >=20 > 3) Upgrade packages as normal: >=20 > pkg upgrade >=20 > You should see pkg wanting to remove perl5.20, install perl5.22 and > reinstall all perl modules or other ports with a run-time dependency on > perl. OK; that appears to have worked as advertised -- thanks you! (I do a "poudriere bulk" as part of the weekly upgrade in any case, as I've updated the ports working copy, so the production machines do a "pkg upgrade" just after updating base FreeBSD.) So -- in my case -- the "short answer" was: * Specify the local default in /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/make.conf via: DEFAULT_VERSIONS+=3D perl5=3D5.22 =20 * Perform the usual weekly upgrade. And "so far, so good" -- I have verified that I can send & receive email, at least, and other stuff seems OK so far. :-) > Note that the default version of perl in your repo will get the pkgname > 'perl5', and all others will get a pkgname of the form 'perl5.XY' -- so > in my repo, I have: >=20 > % pkg search -x perl5 > perl5-5.22.0_2 > perl5.20-5.20.2_6 >=20 > ie 5.22 is the default version but I also have a (basically useless) > perl5.20 package. > .... Huh; interesting: thanks. I may poke at that after I have occasion to power up the build machine again (probably not until tomorrow). Thank you both for your guidance! Peace, david --=20 David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org Those who would murder in the name of God or prophet are blasphemous coward= s. See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --qcHopEYAB45HaUaB Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJV7EC6XxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ4RThEMDY4QTIxMjc1MDZFRDIzODYzRTc4 QTY3RjlDOERFRjQxOTNCAAoJEIpn+cje9Bk7d7cP/3+M9mOF/r42UJx6cWpcXPo2 ogMNfPQtS1X9n1y9yA6/j4fgUzthDJi9zNr0JaHJWdYh3z0ruOAeVF0UozU+kxXh RW8O/gz1QdlrkXupoyJ6EPc9wuth+Lox8bQvH7RnM83TnEbNHWPJ1ezrnDT2Gyp0 9GowlHyc/IfedFEgsHy+SxgLToMxiV9BpwPhlK2lQCtbR2AxIFzUTNLvOtv2JPUP Zj8TQC6xOW4LEpYz2iy5o7QqZbyP19y28ysClSX/C1Pct635TSm2RWCeV2ob13lX Zr2Dzhf+ttfvjzX+H9E2QESvqHWYhVxnaU8qJ3MovQ28+SaNKCAj2CFep0UMiCye ta4ZXcfoekR+IgY4Ck+2hT6uY0QGkZ37JpT7jhjyCs1ke53Hl8g38FXzE3dwo3TH FeQajjoIkTHgnzBAdgYIGrJyXSziPdxrLh+GkP+RwHZrM8InFrqElEq5uXez6hp4 /VDGpDsh53Xpd6bD4t4OHJxaMARft+iSVr2shbf/+mIhDEDoP7ORncxJr/1rCwea 5EkNATGM/I0GMSOaqPYsgplwlYXLiupsPBBGbFWgCJatJhlEuniZKhwPhdiiklZ1 8mVuzjTZ61VQ5GNvlITl2WwcCx6kMG1yp9OIX5aSGNYo/9I8wD1xyYIthXxlJrp4 ZDe6Pp0dg61PsVZXw9Fq =+d/G -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --qcHopEYAB45HaUaB-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Sep 6 18:29:33 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 402309CCC7E for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2015 18:29:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@gmx.de) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.17.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2D5FE9E for ; Sun, 6 Sep 2015 18:29:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohauer@gmx.de) Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([87.139.233.65]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MHal6-1ZVMMk0adA-003OpM; Sun, 06 Sep 2015 20:29:18 +0200 Subject: Re: Migrating from perl5-5.20 to perl5.22 using custom packages? References: <20150906133346.GB1131@albert.catwhisker.org> Cc: David Wolfskill From: olli hauer X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <55EC85FA.5030209@gmx.de> Date: Sun, 6 Sep 2015 20:29:14 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150906133346.GB1131@albert.catwhisker.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:NOnklXwvr93N0gj7nRwxOoXspTwFwVZWvDTXPmeYacEM1imyn4N C9aL7WUhmz+rgCVHTGfS1UMHaAuQ2sc7vhsoXAVHGC5vOYC9SY0U/EPjf2jzGFG/F0Krqw1 CAip4t9d8jOJxHZgPu6YvCFfQ74tqEcwyIOvznpFVq+5tEjfqE2lrPMdxNVYaBu0BpA8E1h dLmqjb0xy+bN3mxD+vbMg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:t/HnRQd7Y84=:FwtmE2N3e10dsqY7MB1Qdg HHChNFPecvnzPpunTfsIjKglQeIntxZgpyEeVTn16djFCLgzV5wR4s8xqzdZQ+5MVIl43JcPA BNviha7oEPoRIwyTfS/sN+Qs5+fsdZz6OJ5PxwvsIMfx/BsMEFxaPRUdH8bqWQPAPW+xYQqKi RQSU78dq+Z/QeLU3rI1mc7cq2+N8VfKdcRKwRr/sBv2uHAgSID4BgSxjyDb1TdpRL3wY5sxXj Nx0MeK3GbLIkWfYm68bk42JMb7VeJO6THRgALt1L8N9bLJCO2jNp74Qm9NntwOBvpubS6zO9j 8UaphuuvOOf5q3Buhp6O+N2WTg1EPgp2WuzgXh9EH0uQPmFn0uCqXs6kr3Owd6PTNRWocCXX+ CJIIk4E6sqkBYGSP2KkCOBRKvrdqkIlX9DT8z3uJlfizpgJkJmbdzW9l1Fqec3ADmaIChZIME lo8V7s0WB71SJddFCJd76QeW9GwJymYHa7w3Vt7RKKCoDLlYxA5rRekpIjChEmw7R7yC/S3VD xckJESF4uKK1Yc1hqFA+IKVTITcRp8YkPtIHOQvl9zsyUYWVspvkpdN29X+gVuxAei4H0Lsda PCMZFLD8pSuuJVesEDrNx+7ijP1zp0nA58EDB9HTIi8FpIUOf+BVHnRu+NBljfC+H495RFgOT 0MpssO/U+WSTlgXpO6IjQswXY5McEp+ipxJIDuowBh722BdBD69npSGoYaiJoWxO9sxqB626h rymXLt5oE8ZuxjQE9WaN47CB4PU5ODcImWN6Tg== X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2015 18:29:33 -0000 On 2015-09-06 15:33, David Wolfskill wrote: > On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 09:26:22PM +0200, olli hauer wrote: >> ... > > Well, as I pointed out in the original note, I use portmaster on my > "development" systems (which I update daily), and poudriere/pkg on the > "production" systems (which I update weekly). Why not set up a second package set for the development systems? If you change "-z home" to "-z devel" you will get a a second package set. The nice thing it will always build in a clean environment and you can detect / fix build issues before you upgrade your development systems (with pkg) E.g in your case: # poudriere bulk -j 10amd64 -p ports -z devel -f 10amd64-home-pkglist PS: if you don't use perl5.20 anywhere just delete the package from $LOCALBASE/poudriere/data/10amd64-home/All/ and after the next run it is no longer offered. -- olli From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Sep 7 10:52:32 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBA9B99A612 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2015 10:52:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4E011EB6 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2015 10:52:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D4A0D99A60E; Mon, 7 Sep 2015 10:52:32 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D442D99A60D for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2015 10:52:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4FE71EB5 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2015 10:52:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t87AqWqA032132 for ; Mon, 7 Sep 2015 10:52:32 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id t87AqWP7032131; Mon, 7 Sep 2015 10:52:32 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201509071052.t87AqWP7032131@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 10:52:32 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Sep 2015 10:52:33 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ multimedia/kaffeine | 1.2.2 | 1.3.1 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ net/abills | 0.55 | 0.58 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ net/pear-Net_SMTP | 1.6.3 | 1.7.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 8 00:12:29 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DC289CDCFD for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 00:12:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (mx.catwhisker.org [198.144.209.73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 557BB1C33 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 00:12:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from david@catwhisker.org) Received: from albert.catwhisker.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t880CRr0020106; Mon, 7 Sep 2015 17:12:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david@albert.catwhisker.org) Received: (from david@localhost) by albert.catwhisker.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id t880CRJk020105; Mon, 7 Sep 2015 17:12:27 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from david) Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 17:12:27 -0700 From: David Wolfskill To: olli hauer Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Migrating from perl5-5.20 to perl5.22 using custom packages? Message-ID: <20150908001227.GW1131@albert.catwhisker.org> References: <20150906133346.GB1131@albert.catwhisker.org> <55EC85FA.5030209@gmx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="GOaLjq+VdFesH+wR" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55EC85FA.5030209@gmx.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 00:12:29 -0000 --GOaLjq+VdFesH+wR Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Sep 06, 2015 at 08:29:14PM +0200, olli hauer wrote: > ... > > Well, as I pointed out in the original note, I use portmaster on my > > "development" systems (which I update daily), and poudriere/pkg on the > > "production" systems (which I update weekly). >=20 > Why not set up a second package set for the development systems? Since you (explicitly) asked, I'll answer that question (below). > If you change "-z home" to "-z devel" you will get a a second package set. > The nice thing it will always build in a clean environment and you can de= tect / fix build issues before you upgrade your development systems (with p= kg) >=20 > E.g in your case: > # poudriere bulk -j 10amd64 -p ports -z devel -f 10amd64-home-pkglist Aye; I see how to do it. I'm less convinced that I want to do it. Please note that after many years of using portmaster (and before that, portupgrade), I am "easing into" poudriere & "pkg upgrade". And when it comes time for me to build ports under stable/11, I will probably use poudriere to do that. More below. The development systems are (with respect to ports) a "study in contrasts": * The build machine has (nearly) a minimal set of ports and actually runs a GENERIC kernel. (The "nearly" qualifier is because I had built devel/subversion for an earlier incarnation of it, and I haven't got around to switching (completely) to svnlite on it.) It has security/sudo, sysutils/tmux, net/rsync, sysutils/dmidecode, sysutils/smartmontools, and ports-mmgmt/portmaster; lately, it also has ports-mgmt/poudriere-devel. Updating ports on it using portmaster is pretty easy. "portmaster --list-origins | wc -l" returns 12, and "pkg info | wc -l " returns 22 on that machine. * My laptop is both a "development" machine and (very!) user-facing. So it ends up having nearly a superset of all the ports I install on any of my machines. (The exceptions that come to mind are that I have some ports on my externally-visible MTA that I install nowhere else, and -- unlike my "production" machines -- I don't run an authoritative name server on my laptop.) "portmaster --list-origins | wc -l" returns 272, and "pkg info | wc -l" returns 985 on the laptop. For comparison & contrast, the corresponding numbers for the production machines are: * Packet filter & externally-visible authoritative name server & MTA: "portmaster --list-origins | wc -l": 5; "pkg info | wc -l": 26. * Internal "workhorse" machine: "portmaster --list-origins | wc -l": 118; "pkg info | wc -l": 624. Then, there's the issue of how I have my networks (yes, plural) set up at home. My laptop normally uses the wireless NIC; it thus resides on the network that has the access point. I do not trust wireless access to be secure, so that network is separate from my internal "trusted" network. Access from the wireless (or "guest") network to the trusted network is restricted to ssh, DNS, HTTP(S), rsync (to the build machine only) and ping. [ssh authentication is only via public key, and root is not permitted to login via ssh.] Recently, I had occasion to set up another isolated internal network (for VPN & related things). There's a network topology diagram of this at . The build machine does not run a Web server. It does act as an NFS server -- for NFS clients that are on its network. (It also acts as an NFS client, as its SVN repo mirror and the /usr/ports working copy are each on the ReadyNAS.) The production machines get access to the built packages via NFS. I presently run poudriere twice weekly: once, on Sunday morning, just after updating FreeBSD stable/10 on the build machine (and updating the /usr/ports working copy), and once the day before (in an attempt to get the bulk of the week's worth of updates done and "out of the way" before the "festivities" start on sunday morning). Given my experience with the poudriere runs separated by 1 day of updates, if I were to run poudriere daily, I expect that this process would not be complete until after I had left the house to go to work. That would make updating the ports/packages on the laptop from my build machine fairly awkward. As things presently stand, it normally takes my laptop about 20 minutes to update stable/10 (while running "portmaster -aF to fetch distfiles), about 10 minutes to run "portmaster -ad", and about 25 minutes to update head (while running X, but not running things like Web broaswers locally). That allows plenty of time for me to finish up well before cycling to the shuttle stop. (The laptop uses rsync to update its local copy of the private SVN mirror that is updated by the build machine; these updates occur overnight via cron(8).) So for the "usual" work, I think portmaster is a better fit for both the build machine and my laptop than using poudriere & "pkg upgrade" is in my case -- though the latter are working quite well for the production machines, and I am very glad to be able to use them. > PS: > if you don't use perl5.20 anywhere just delete the package from $LOCALBAS= E/poudriere/data/10amd64-home/All/ and after the next run it is no longer o= ffered. > .... Well, I think I'll take care of the perl5.18 package first. :-) But yes; I'm just being a bit lazy (& conservative) about cleaning up. Peace, david --=20 David H. Wolfskill david@catwhisker.org Those who would murder in the name of God or prophet are blasphemous coward= s. See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key. --GOaLjq+VdFesH+wR Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJV7ifrXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ4RThEMDY4QTIxMjc1MDZFRDIzODYzRTc4 QTY3RjlDOERFRjQxOTNCAAoJEIpn+cje9Bk7O0gP/2kYDf8vBl2BhX8yrT0qHLu1 mhSaxSdWwxPzBqwOfIWd5dc1BplLwtsNxD57zbUcQQijKrMzFBVIpZF/Zrf5/tRL wolzZWe80fvCToMJLPLoyU5OgLSvT5b2LStuR+SeOa1Ol9WwZFoh2YFIJUnB4o+E mVk9Oahm8o6XG7FRICowTiH1xZEV1KKpRoVDNZ5tkOumMDUKKS8reKhGJIKxbRwN kXJfqJGYQL+PEMNAq+FB+dcuMtbuyorH270NETR+nJcst0VqF13sc605dHNcn05p 5mB4RFFn0LsRO3QNYBOAmxa0s3ZbBiVm6m22VRVs+ZAjlqEat4b7T4Jtb7Y7ASfs TJqwMNmYF4r9B/V/RIERvRqmIvRS8Es5M1Wqr+JWHkASPR//Gwi3oJ1Nr3qqruf2 2i20LVjqMqxgKjwkQM+pL0FCGZlkJMzdAxg3jgiDKXrn3rFC8NIQKbCzSz7YvvdY J9RK5Hb8AJYuU89AeiWpAO26qlZsVGUtHkgO4R78RtLxIASpm6o8pQWjUptW4WC1 sdkxwYCvkBhVNSEe9q72e051IOYTM6LYUw+oCyzCuSFZwBAcXtGLCbHxZkoFF6MK Ue9rbNlCkODMRoAXg1o9i4q5ISAGHbOXlG0KBjx8vSyQ95M1aotPALKiWkJWEVyx G+uot/A+Q/a0h7SnrYyw =Z+a7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --GOaLjq+VdFesH+wR-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 8 02:20:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B82F9CD104 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 02:20:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bernard.therriault@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CC261607 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 02:20:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bernard.therriault@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 6C2AA9CD103; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 02:20:06 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BD629CD102 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 02:20:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bernard.therriault@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qg0-x22a.google.com (mail-qg0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A3811604; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 02:20:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bernard.therriault@gmail.com) Received: by qgev79 with SMTP id v79so72401952qge.0; Mon, 07 Sep 2015 19:20:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=to:subject:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=AYG6jW3Ye5DKIuuXaeJwYWFO4RWGkltzDrPt1f07k4g=; b=e49zOWSxvT3TFpL9dyjtY7p2ofL8V8hkc3sKQEXwfAuS6aj2Ju5F496LUQ5mp9hNea bLnbrM3NaB2Ih/fJU4FuNn2pQ31RSRANuTvalF4qTYNXsIcyDvGBVEvNbS4M7BePEk+d xmtXOYzj1vU8Nrnc0L4IRH/gAmobslzvG5soxaW0ceaSZiL+IrsXtTWE3sgcz09siCEu 2/qRIEQXkKfivDnmbgUVDXjMx3QHgx2xey28FDuBJD07mJ4hFHd44KLn+48jb5fmxZet 9yBlN0qcmAODx1MnmDzI2wbdG+rHv2Onnv2gZg99STlNdjLEqy2JCxY/wRa/qTXFyQvv SaDw== X-Received: by 10.140.98.213 with SMTP id o79mr30531287qge.19.1441678805216; Mon, 07 Sep 2015 19:20:05 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.145.2.32] (24-50-72-104.sh.cgocable.ca. [24.50.72.104]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g197sm985703qhc.35.2015.09.07.19.20.04 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 07 Sep 2015 19:20:04 -0700 (PDT) To: ale@FreeBSD.org Subject: FreeBSD Port: php56-pgsql-5.6.12 Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org From: Bernard Therriault Message-ID: <55EE45D3.5000102@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2015 22:20:03 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.0.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 02:20:06 -0000 Hello, trying to install php56-pgsql-5.6.12 requiring postgresql93-client We're using postgresql94 client-server Is it possible to update the port with the 94 series please. Thank you very much for your time. Bernard Therriault From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 8 02:32:43 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21E5D9CD7DD for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 02:32:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D371DF4 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 02:32:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id F134C9CD7DC; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 02:32:42 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0D079CD7DB for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 02:32:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-x22d.google.com (mail-pa0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CB7E01DF3; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 02:32:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by padhk3 with SMTP id hk3so25080341pad.3; Mon, 07 Sep 2015 19:32:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:reply-to:subject:references:to:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=DPgCdHvJx0jMd0kvj4NDO/D/wgTl9Q0+2qV/Pk1w7Sc=; b=TnmjJxdeXmVR0E+Msis/E2TH2eeB3pRqe0U4r/yHJIqFbDLdSawUlmwzLeUFpZGe4E 6Um5+ysk7m801HL4ssEACdNe0FNmjNOVut109VOyd0dcKesPGTGSfgAO13FYpZJUrKQX fIu1beqXy3zNrU5fensqjntgg9O0gJUr6XFotVkS4x6YAmiptEMexdqxx9wEjG3iDe+R XR4VB6/eh3sp6e1VXcR6QF0NHzah6MxcEvb8sKRrxWHR9aV5Jlls34PnxJRE3qFJHJ/Q qiy6h+BBRc1tSUC/El2gWdRVfXmG+rsz+o+7npDDZEQR/n2zccZFc1ZDlxYOL+FuKAoQ LgRA== X-Received: by 10.68.109.34 with SMTP id hp2mr52006987pbb.52.1441679562230; Mon, 07 Sep 2015 19:32:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:44b8:31ae:7b01::4? (2001-44b8-31ae-7b01-0000-0000-0000-0004.static.ipv6.internode.on.net. [2001:44b8:31ae:7b01::4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id jf11sm682334pbd.29.2015.09.07.19.32.39 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 07 Sep 2015 19:32:41 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Kubilay Kocak Reply-To: koobs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: php56-pgsql-5.6.12 References: <55EE45D3.5000102@gmail.com> To: Bernard Therriault Cc: ale@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org From: Kubilay Kocak Message-ID: <55EE48C4.7010303@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 12:32:36 +1000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:40.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/40.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <55EE45D3.5000102@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 02:32:43 -0000 On 8/09/2015 12:20 PM, Bernard Therriault wrote: > Hello, > trying to install php56-pgsql-5.6.12 requiring postgresql93-client > We're using postgresql94 client-server > Is it possible to update the port with the 94 series please. > > Thank you very much for your time. > Hi Bernard It appears the php56 port USES=pgsql, which means users can use "DEFAULT_VERSIONS" (in /etc/make.conf) to set the PostgreSQL version the port should use. See /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.default-versions.mk for more information ./koobs From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 8 07:06:57 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DDCDA0041B for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 07:06:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from www@renner.se) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E53F11844 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 07:06:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from www@renner.se) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E19F7A0041A; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 07:06:56 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E136EA00419 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 07:06:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from www@renner.se) Received: from mxf5.bahnhof.se (mxf5.bahnhof.se [213.80.101.29]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DE9B1843 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 07:06:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from www@renner.se) Received: from localhost (mxf5.local [127.0.0.1]) by mxf5-reinject (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44B1F9C331D for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 08:46:56 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at bahnhof.se (MXF1) X-Spam-Score: 3.547 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.547 tagged_above=-99 required=5 tests=[DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL=0.306, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=1.988, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=1.253] Received: from mxf5.bahnhof.se ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mxf5.bahnhof.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jb4gYzJy2L5N for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 08:46:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from renner.se (h-142-22.a357.priv.bahnhof.se [81.170.142.22]) by mxf5.bahnhof.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id E24CA9C331B for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 08:46:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from www by renner.se with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZCg4-000Lc8-Il for ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2015 08:46:48 +0200 Received: from 131.116.185.56 (131.116.185.56 [131.116.185.56]) by renner.se (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Tue, 08 Sep 2015 08:46:48 +0200 Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 08:46:48 +0200 Message-ID: <20150908084648.Horde.f5e7ej0V4ZwbpZx4teF5Kvu@renner.se> From: Jimmy Renner To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Packages lagging for 10.2 User-Agent: Horde Application Framework 5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Sender: World Wide Web Owner X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 07:06:57 -0000 Hi, I don't know if this is the right list to post to but for me lots (a bit over 100) of ports are updated but if I do a pkg upgrade not much is updated. This has been the case since I upgraded to 10.2. No complaints, I was just wondering if I have done anything wrong :-) Cheers, Jimmy From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 8 07:21:33 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAC42A00C31 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 07:21:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39E121239 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 07:21:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from liminal.local (liminal.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3636:3bff:fed4:b0d6]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id t887LLee053687 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 08:21:21 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk t887LLee053687 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/t887LLee053687; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host liminal.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3636:3bff:fed4:b0d6] claimed to be liminal.local Subject: Re: Packages lagging for 10.2 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20150908084648.Horde.f5e7ej0V4ZwbpZx4teF5Kvu@renner.se> From: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: <55EE8C6A.8040707@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 08:21:14 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150908084648.Horde.f5e7ej0V4ZwbpZx4teF5Kvu@renner.se> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Es6qbaH50gwUlxLddO19tpcseixUcv1eV" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 07:21:33 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --Es6qbaH50gwUlxLddO19tpcseixUcv1eV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 08/09/2015 07:46, Jimmy Renner wrote: > I don't know if this is the right list to post to but for me lots (a bi= t > over 100) of ports are updated but if I do a pkg upgrade not much is > updated. This has been the case since I upgraded to 10.2. No complaints= , > I was just wondering if I have done anything wrong :-) You haven't done anything wrong. You're just using the quarterly package branch, which is a change in the defaults since 10.1-RELEASE. Cheers, Matthew --Es6qbaH50gwUlxLddO19tpcseixUcv1eV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJV7oxxXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ2NTNBNjhCOTEzQTRFNkNGM0UxRTEzMjZC QjIzQUY1MThFMUE0MDEzAAoJELsjr1GOGkATh1gP/jlPlYLto+nfr3U6KVoICs2Z 0fMMkYE1k/aPnRqTVV8I34DuEEIVzUsuDwtXCOZD/bCo41d/EP/2AhPu7GI+9TBm iFnpoaGkKuFtrfYAfXXhIrjBLXDYIpe3TNkPEEVLSaq+LKEW4W1595Vvx6awER34 sU8eng0y8U9hHdNa6HA6I3WDU5Osy5tsEf0wis1K7BhVGgpVM5AbekAcwurh7aqJ JGqbeOKKrjHcTsTS72EUx6apFp6Xw6MGexs4kxk4g1MxRzH7HtwcyXI4iLKBHBnb qS9lgeIhJgK2+8pI2DykO/eQ7x7zqEAdMsnOCKJk4lylrZWECk//2hlxisU4PpiW YSt7FWiSOEVLG4OD1fkKQPod2Ny2JIXl8t6ZapZdZx60FBCc0XkzqVN1Yh5Y2+qL mjt/K2lf8ET0mQMRwzR9rnxO9Ue1IJXJkcGReKu+b/mSoeiWd7wjYtJ7FhEKRHNa 19DC/vH4MwE8FVNH3qSA9d9D4JL5l2tOgjQDe1V3/47McSibNDMKzX6Um7xP9flQ DVct1TZ4j8bo++b0ro3eghc8wHihPMCnHbMBeIhTu8nvHNddGdPosl2le3LMc2Ge FODa3fnUH9oJ1p40NoMfIHw01IPhmptn5Xe4m35GAtFmb+rebyGgDAA0F5NTH/SQ XgG2zXZotyLV/ohsQDpH =aVf4 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Es6qbaH50gwUlxLddO19tpcseixUcv1eV-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 8 08:28:50 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F7489CDF91 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 08:28:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from avasout08.plus.net (avasout08.plus.net [212.159.14.20]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Bizanga Labs SMTP Client Certificate", Issuer "Bizanga Labs CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9047178E for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 08:28:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk) Received: from curlew.milibyte.co.uk ([80.229.31.82]) by avasout08 with smtp id EYRb1r0021mJoLY01YRcDA; Tue, 08 Sep 2015 09:25:36 +0100 X-CM-Score: 0.00 X-CNFS-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=bI7rW6KZ c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=cd0K7rcWwnZFf6xQxRobyA==:117 a=cd0K7rcWwnZFf6xQxRobyA==:17 a=D7rCoLxHAAAA:8 a=0Bzu9jTXAAAA:8 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=ff-B7xzCdYMA:10 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=DfMKHrBiSyq3uiMPPhMA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 Received: from curlew.lan ([192.168.1.13]) by curlew.milibyte.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.86) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZEDe-0000ph-8j for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2015 09:25:34 +0100 Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 09:25:34 +0100 From: Mike Clarke To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20150908092534.52de6190@curlew.lan> In-Reply-To: <20150908084648.Horde.f5e7ej0V4ZwbpZx4teF5Kvu@renner.se> References: <20150908084648.Horde.f5e7ej0V4ZwbpZx4teF5Kvu@renner.se> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.12.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.1) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.1.13 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: jmc-freebsd2@milibyte.co.uk X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on curlew.lan X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Subject: Re: Packages lagging for 10.2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2 X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on curlew.milibyte.co.uk) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 08:28:50 -0000 On Tue, 08 Sep 2015 08:46:48 +0200 Jimmy Renner wrote: > I don't know if this is the right list to post to but for me lots (a > bit over 100) of ports are updated but if I do a pkg upgrade not much > is updated. This has been the case since I upgraded to 10.2. No > complaints, I was just wondering if I have done anything wrong :-) 10.2 now uses the quarterly repository by default but you can switch to using the latest packages if you create /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/FreeBSD.conf as below: FreeBSD: { url: "pkg+http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/${ABI}/latest" } This will override the url attribute in /etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf -- Mike Clarke From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 8 10:52:14 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B71469CC35F for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 10:52:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9ECAC1175 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 10:52:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 9E3BD9CC35C; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 10:52:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9DD5B9CC35B for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 10:52:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8EA481174 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 10:52:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t88AqEbV019897 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 10:52:14 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id t88AqEKm019896; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 10:52:14 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201509081052.t88AqEKm019896@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 10:52:14 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 10:52:14 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ audio/qsynth | 0.3.9 | 0.4.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ databases/jasperreports | 5.5.2 | 6.1.1 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 8 12:45:40 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80A3FA004F9 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 12:45:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pa0-x235.google.com (mail-pa0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F65C1EBE; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 12:45:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from koobs.freebsd@gmail.com) Received: by padhy16 with SMTP id hy16so121461252pad.1; Tue, 08 Sep 2015 05:45:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:reply-to:subject:references:to:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=tFyWdHObKTCDlEHazoaynoCZ/00Udwpy6GjbtFjWSJY=; b=Mfpws9VQ/dq/HsPzSqjS2K20YcJRMPsFScFIhfvWET5ecwP68PAZ/NTa771hAovS8u K05ZqaoSgWBOxHUQRWCIoMZ05bBEKIZWTKLhuGk1vMPVvZthSWCgjbt2L882Tcc/7s/k W/8X0OMbyVYVwsRKRsrAw+E4RpNL4oLHHnFY8fnorqT1LoLyRzUbNoIyXbFwGwfperD6 dRfg9PQmMlVRHrjLV3/rXUJcoZ/S4V5HNPBfGPePzwKaeYLdfYplHWFbyCg4hQdCJgml Lyi6fT4uyiv4SqPzh4kplpyV83ozY2IFpMLdCW3dk/D3NZOImg7w6yIBUtvAf5m9UV64 G8ew== X-Received: by 10.68.200.40 with SMTP id jp8mr59046630pbc.16.1441716339766; Tue, 08 Sep 2015 05:45:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:44b8:31ae:7b01::4? (2001-44b8-31ae-7b01-0000-0000-0000-0004.static.ipv6.internode.on.net. [2001:44b8:31ae:7b01::4]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ld8sm3348897pbc.61.2015.09.08.05.45.37 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 08 Sep 2015 05:45:39 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Kubilay Kocak Reply-To: koobs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Packages lagging for 10.2 References: <20150908084648.Horde.f5e7ej0V4ZwbpZx4teF5Kvu@renner.se> <55EE8C6A.8040707@FreeBSD.org> To: Matthew Seaman , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, "portmgr@FreeBSD.org" From: Kubilay Kocak Message-ID: <55EED86E.4010408@FreeBSD.org> Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 22:45:34 +1000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:40.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/40.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <55EE8C6A.8040707@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 12:45:40 -0000 On 8/09/2015 5:21 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 08/09/2015 07:46, Jimmy Renner wrote: >> I don't know if this is the right list to post to but for me lots (a bit >> over 100) of ports are updated but if I do a pkg upgrade not much is >> updated. This has been the case since I upgraded to 10.2. No complaints, >> I was just wondering if I have done anything wrong :-) > > You haven't done anything wrong. You're just using the quarterly > package branch, which is a change in the defaults since 10.1-RELEASE. > > Cheers, > > Matthew > > Do you know if this was -announce'd to users? If not, there's no such thing as too much communication. -- ./koobs Putting FreeBSD User Experience First From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 8 12:50:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C7CFA007A2 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 12:50:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crest@rlwinm.de) Received: from smtp.rlwinm.de (smtp.rlwinm.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:201:31ef::e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2393E10BE for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 12:50:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crest@rlwinm.de) Received: from crest.local (unknown [87.253.189.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.rlwinm.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 718576C3B for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 14:50:55 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: Packages lagging for 10.2 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20150908084648.Horde.f5e7ej0V4ZwbpZx4teF5Kvu@renner.se> <55EE8C6A.8040707@FreeBSD.org> <55EED86E.4010408@FreeBSD.org> From: Jan Bramkamp Message-ID: <55EED9AF.40103@rlwinm.de> Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 14:50:55 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <55EED86E.4010408@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 12:50:59 -0000 On 08/09/15 14:45, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > On 8/09/2015 5:21 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> On 08/09/2015 07:46, Jimmy Renner wrote: >>> I don't know if this is the right list to post to but for me lots (a bit >>> over 100) of ports are updated but if I do a pkg upgrade not much is >>> updated. This has been the case since I upgraded to 10.2. No complaints, >>> I was just wondering if I have done anything wrong :-) >> >> You haven't done anything wrong. You're just using the quarterly >> package branch, which is a change in the defaults since 10.1-RELEASE. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Matthew >> >> > > Do you know if this was -announce'd to users? > > If not, there's no such thing as too much communication. It was part of the release message. The -latest repos switched to a daily instead of weekly build schedule as well. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 8 13:01:58 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A93BA00DCE for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 13:01:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x233.google.com (mail-wi0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B10EC1892; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 13:01:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from baptiste.daroussin@gmail.com) Received: by wicfx3 with SMTP id fx3so119319141wic.1; Tue, 08 Sep 2015 06:01:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-type:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=xt2SPQErNFtk55TSh4nzpJCwui4Vxn32paX4+tVPN9U=; b=DAfB9Yy1CqVFvLXLtltTgvk/L9yhq6tfDNr2fWzyiIcVC8XVxM5QiMEy9CmyGtRa6l YZ1Fhuhplg4P8u3Sogmi4PlNXMkSOEEh6B/u+rM8nZAplAQ56odsEmwKtRM60fsnrx8a K80BzGoKFWYdE27X3pVKvyrQWfl7d4HWQsKBRrh/aGF1f408qg5icD9DFmt9DctbHku0 /JBVBc8E5LFT2scOoUxw94wiOj2LChKBXZAXc6lX3d0c91J7Pm/z4nYYCd5hOwcFe+pG GGJN+w39Csf8jhhHJtaw5dC+AIm8B9uPXyTpQFZ0z1eTLEkwsAFaGZeQPN0zivmunrZB CynQ== X-Received: by 10.180.99.137 with SMTP id eq9mr5498544wib.4.1441717315820; Tue, 08 Sep 2015 06:01:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ivaldir.etoilebsd.net ([2001:41d0:8:db4c::1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id jw9sm4751709wjb.28.2015.09.08.06.01.54 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 08 Sep 2015 06:01:54 -0700 (PDT) Sender: Baptiste Daroussin Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 15:01:53 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Kubilay Kocak Cc: Matthew Seaman , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, "portmgr@FreeBSD.org" Subject: Re: Packages lagging for 10.2 Message-ID: <20150908130153.GB38185@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> References: <20150908084648.Horde.f5e7ej0V4ZwbpZx4teF5Kvu@renner.se> <55EE8C6A.8040707@FreeBSD.org> <55EED86E.4010408@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="gj572EiMnwbLXET9" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55EED86E.4010408@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 13:01:58 -0000 --gj572EiMnwbLXET9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Sep 08, 2015 at 10:45:34PM +1000, Kubilay Kocak wrote: > On 8/09/2015 5:21 PM, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > On 08/09/2015 07:46, Jimmy Renner wrote: > >> I don't know if this is the right list to post to but for me lots (a b= it > >> over 100) of ports are updated but if I do a pkg upgrade not much is > >> updated. This has been the case since I upgraded to 10.2. No complaint= s, > >> I was just wondering if I have done anything wrong :-) > >=20 > > You haven't done anything wrong. You're just using the quarterly > > package branch, which is a change in the defaults since 10.1-RELEASE. > >=20 > > Cheers, > >=20 > > Matthew > >=20 > >=20 >=20 > Do you know if this was -announce'd to users? >=20 > If not, there's no such thing as too much communication. This is not a portmgr concern, but a re@ concern and yes it has been announ= ced as it is in the release note. Bapt --gj572EiMnwbLXET9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iEYEARECAAYFAlXu3EAACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ew1jgCfc2L99fnm0jAYLjNpZTOXYsPO 6ZUAn2SXQeASQUqc3QU3dkS7aMEaLNNv =OOZm -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --gj572EiMnwbLXET9-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 8 13:52:23 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DC835A00650 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 13:52:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from www@renner.se) Received: from mxf1.bahnhof.se (mxf1.bahnhof.se [213.80.101.25]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 968121E25 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 13:52:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from www@renner.se) Received: from localhost (mxf1.local [127.0.0.1]) by mxf1-reinject (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D638396C3A for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 15:26:57 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new using ClamAV at bahnhof.se (MXF1) X-Spam-Score: 3.547 X-Spam-Level: *** X-Spam-Status: No, score=3.547 tagged_above=-99 required=5 tests=[DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL=0.306, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL=1.988, RCVD_NUMERIC_HELO=1.253] Received: from mxf1.bahnhof.se ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mxf1.bahnhof.se [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TiNFkyrO2Iq1 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 15:26:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from renner.se (h-142-22.a357.priv.bahnhof.se [81.170.142.22]) by mxf1.bahnhof.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FBDE396C2C for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 15:26:50 +0200 (CEST) Received: from www by renner.se with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZIvB-0002Hz-QD for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Tue, 08 Sep 2015 15:26:49 +0200 Received: from 131.116.185.56 (131.116.185.56 [131.116.185.56]) by renner.se (Horde Framework) with HTTP; Tue, 08 Sep 2015 15:26:49 +0200 Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 15:26:49 +0200 Message-ID: <20150908152649.Horde.8wk7-fBKIMN6uMNAmNpipEl@renner.se> From: Jimmy Renner To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Packages lagging for 10.2 References: <20150908084648.Horde.f5e7ej0V4ZwbpZx4teF5Kvu@renner.se> <20150908092534.52de6190@curlew.lan> In-Reply-To: <20150908092534.52de6190@curlew.lan> User-Agent: Horde Application Framework 5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Sender: World Wide Web Owner X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 13:52:24 -0000 Citerar Mike Clarke : > On Tue, 08 Sep 2015 08:46:48 +0200 > Jimmy Renner wrote: > >> I don't know if this is the right list to post to but for me lots (a >> bit over 100) of ports are updated but if I do a pkg upgrade not much >> is updated. This has been the case since I upgraded to 10.2. No >> complaints, I was just wondering if I have done anything wrong :-) > > 10.2 now uses the quarterly repository by default but you can switch to > using the latest packages if you > create /usr/local/etc/pkg/repos/FreeBSD.conf as below: > > FreeBSD: { > url: "pkg+http://pkg.FreeBSD.org/${ABI}/latest" > } > > This will override the url attribute in /etc/pkg/FreeBSD.conf > > -- > Mike Clarke My bad. I have to admit I had stopped reading before that last line in the realeas notes :-) Thanks Mike! / Jimmy From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 8 21:44:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A4A3A00FA0 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 21:44:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pkubaj@riseup.net) Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D2F31C17 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 21:44:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pkubaj@riseup.net) Received: from cotinga.riseup.net (unknown [10.0.1.161]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9FD9CC19F1 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 14:44:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1441748692; bh=QjglF5WLMOkwPF8nYgwcfjJJJXRvOK76efKLiRGfVAY=; h=To:From:Subject:Date:From; b=AaHZ+PUaJozlZIv3BIfUIe9/+XodQ3ZwKLEx69kSyrOPnwSa5Sk2CjQ5Tz5t36ama Isa2BXeNAh3MhpG82b5hlLwTQ6SDgFShc9li8dNSzKCtYh3LAbjJu9EyhcGVKrpuHM /WPZhRQOCPlT3Ct5lfP29uELdUSafT17S4ZERhSE= Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: pkubaj) with ESMTPSA id 1F0DE1C0275 To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org From: Piotr Kubaj Subject: Is there an equivalent of NO_EXTRACT? Message-ID: <55EF56C9.4000800@riseup.net> Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 23:44:41 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="a6BTC9AHLqAIfRlm21KtFWrQtQGQKACrJ" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at mx1.riseup.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 21:44:59 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --a6BTC9AHLqAIfRlm21KtFWrQtQGQKACrJ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I'm a maintainer of a few ports. For the next update I'm preparing, I want to make it possible to download some addons via options. The thing is, they are downloaded as-is. They are not meant to be extracted (although they are zips), since it's the program itself that manages it. Is there such a possibility? --a6BTC9AHLqAIfRlm21KtFWrQtQGQKACrJ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJV71bQAAoJEC9nKukRsfY+G4wP/jQuXS/0DaSMIYiYflw3gwdD z75BTkkj4+zcWEl+3+QGwtIk2IO5vgkS54xaMFcqQL8Sc6T72A+66pZJCiXdSFMx nfsvDrkQ2QrJOVm1YqmdExFO6Lwmet30PGCKUj5S2/OqreLNH6efNczg23AnmoiW jWTKv6QbyicfqKZca7skSG/YsZcWjKTSUkApDcHfS4r5wU9s0ZEeGfPTJ9VT51mI QWfRQ52rAW5+gLzZ0YGP5DBmd8zEUjP1ojQPq0kBYOt6IESEsKKOhqbxHdOiwhR0 HOTmsNa5A4H5245fmYy4aZcNLUHYKXDqGHFShCg2IC9YbhyIc6TzVVuQZdLgJ/SK 3sy3+uzUDew8yDSJ5aY/6JpVPm30TdRKymnZxNUZ8ch7WRGzy+tHfpofTguU7UPZ D5tCHznULWV9Wq4OsBwc/JktBwtQIhE/8tePBwQsObVjb5tRqv1a1pOQ/rvx/Nrd uXdGr68AOuvJVMukOVQN13rY+GPB6+gLQq1GqM1ln7/kHvfNtBrutzhpXUcKaeon yq1IM8jVl3H7QcZaPbmLnyonccN2jnskfrTnpiFxgtU7SnDp0vAiYfYCOfphSEVZ 0JtSPGUduwcLVkQY28HMC+CDrUqdt4Sms3PO+B26IzJh5hA/Lws17CLFpJoCNaYV yRHsXmo6AXNVeSlg8lgn =a8rs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --a6BTC9AHLqAIfRlm21KtFWrQtQGQKACrJ-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 8 22:51:27 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21682A00F5D for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 22:51:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (unknown [IPv6:2602:304:b010:ef20::f2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gw.catspoiler.org", Issuer "gw.catspoiler.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 07B17189E for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 22:51:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t88MpKKN087293 for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 15:51:24 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201509082251.t88MpKKN087293@gw.catspoiler.org> Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 15:51:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis Subject: USES=desktop-file-utils, INSTALLS_ICONS, and pkg To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 22:51:27 -0000 I've been working on a port update and happened to notice that when I installed an updated package the entries under the Applications menu on my desktop were not getting updated. Looking at /usr/ports/Mk/Uses/desktop-file-utils.mk, I see that it adds "@desktop-file-utils" to PLIST_FILES, and I do see this in .PLIST.mktmp when I build the port. I don't see it in the +MANIFEST file in the package .txz file. Digging through the source for pkg, I don't see anything in the code for handling @desktop-file-utils. Something else that I don't see in the source for pkg is anything that handles @rmtry, which INSTALL_ICONS wants to add to the plist. Neither of these @things is documented in pkg-create(8). Reading this man page, I see that @exec and @unexec are deprecated, and these are used fairly heavily in the ports framework. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Sep 8 22:58:55 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DB999CC30C for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 22:58:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu) Received: from um-nip4-missouri-out.um.umsystem.edu (um-nip4-missouri-out.um.umsystem.edu [198.209.49.177]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "um-tip1.um.umsystem.edu", Issuer "InCommon RSA Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA1101B9C for ; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 22:58:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from stephen@missouri.edu) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A2BIBQDSZ+9V/9KeoM9dgyOBPQa9LYdwAoE4ORMBAQEBAQEBgQqEIwEBAQQ6TwIBCA4DBAEBHxAyHQgCBAESCIgmxwwBhCkBAQEBAQUBAQEBAQEBAQEZi26EWziDGIEUBZVVAY5FjSiDTog1JoQAcYdEgQUBAQE X-IPAS-Result: A2BIBQDSZ+9V/9KeoM9dgyOBPQa9LYdwAoE4ORMBAQEBAQEBgQqEIwEBAQQ6TwIBCA4DBAEBHxAyHQgCBAESCIgmxwwBhCkBAQEBAQUBAQEBAQEBAQEZi26EWziDGIEUBZVVAY5FjSiDTog1JoQAcYdEgQUBAQE Received: from um-ncas5.um.umsystem.edu ([207.160.158.210]) by um-nip4-exch-relay.um.umsystem.edu with ESMTP; 08 Sep 2015 17:58:46 -0500 Received: from UM-MBX-N02.um.umsystem.edu ([169.254.5.65]) by UM-NCAS5.um.umsystem.edu ([207.160.158.210]) with mapi id 14.03.0248.002; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 17:58:46 -0500 From: "Montgomery-Smith, Stephen" To: Piotr Kubaj , "freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org" Subject: RE: Is there an equivalent of NO_EXTRACT? Thread-Topic: Is there an equivalent of NO_EXTRACT? Thread-Index: AQHQ6n+egcRGvGatK0yVEn/5T2SqRp4zPnOv Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 22:58:46 +0000 Message-ID: References: <55EF56C9.4000800@riseup.net> In-Reply-To: <55EF56C9.4000800@riseup.net> Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [207.160.158.205] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Sep 2015 22:58:55 -0000 I think EXTRACT_ONLY will do the equivalent of what you need.=0A= =0A= ________________________________________=0A= From: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org [owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org] on = behalf of Piotr Kubaj [pkubaj@riseup.net]=0A= Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 4:44 PM=0A= To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org=0A= Subject: Is there an equivalent of NO_EXTRACT?=0A= =0A= I'm a maintainer of a few ports. For the next update I'm preparing, I=0A= want to make it possible to download some addons via options. The thing=0A= is, they are downloaded as-is. They are not meant to be extracted=0A= (although they are zips), since it's the program itself that manages it.=0A= Is there such a possibility?=0A= =0A= From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Sep 9 04:36:38 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7C6D9CC232 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 04:36:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pkubaj@riseup.net) Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9785E103B for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 04:36:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pkubaj@riseup.net) Received: from cotinga.riseup.net (unknown [10.0.1.161]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8CF18C1A38; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 21:36:37 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1441773397; bh=Yw+tfR126nIuMHmfwRlkP9NrHe9BJxyqqxa05j6kHfs=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=RstA0DmxpyBH5V4Qw1jMs62FY45BTPIo0Wp8tfDn+DB9MKPOQIAnc7kWWY0OCdgXY R63lAOrUVpyRGKdK3SutJ6YKoWr+fokCZjHhMqoDZcC9jCSxjKnRn4KAiwJAYUf1J2 W5bpi/C+WLC70wlZxB5SCd0ks/eTNbfqV+zOzHaM= Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: pkubaj) with ESMTPSA id BBF8C1C078B Subject: Re: Is there an equivalent of NO_EXTRACT? To: "Montgomery-Smith, Stephen" References: <55EF56C9.4000800@riseup.net> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org From: Piotr Kubaj Message-ID: <55EFB74C.5090207@riseup.net> Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 06:36:28 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="MQrP7LFEIXAwwegWGqW6IwaAMSDn4e3gO" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at mx1.riseup.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 04:36:38 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --MQrP7LFEIXAwwegWGqW6IwaAMSDn4e3gO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 09/09/2015 00:58, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote: > I think EXTRACT_ONLY will do the equivalent of what you need. >=20 > ________________________________________ > From: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org [owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org]= on behalf of Piotr Kubaj [pkubaj@riseup.net] > Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 4:44 PM > To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org > Subject: Is there an equivalent of NO_EXTRACT? >=20 > I'm a maintainer of a few ports. For the next update I'm preparing, I > want to make it possible to download some addons via options. The thing= > is, they are downloaded as-is. They are not meant to be extracted > (although they are zips), since it's the program itself that manages it= =2E > Is there such a possibility? >=20 No, EXTRACT_ONLY actually extracts distfiles. I don't want them to be extracted, I want them to be copies as-is, since the installed port will manage it itself, it even requires zips. The only solution I see is to tar those distfiles and put them on a separate mirror. Is there any better solution to this? Or maybe someone introduces NO_EXTRACT to bsd.port.mk :) --MQrP7LFEIXAwwegWGqW6IwaAMSDn4e3gO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJV77dMAAoJEC9nKukRsfY+sRAP/A0ZvPjai30HYIdP0dX6sRub hgEgWVL9qAhU/RHva4xVNDqVFSelzLuhc3petmYHsEHA0CMcH3qUObACRdw7VHhP MD+ZORFzG6iHuK3Q2M+r1kd4TiTQF+BBOAKj+2zVGtvw8ZNBd8eP7tKkkigUVRRB KEsE7kpCg2yUN/kKe7Uj62iC7tawIOmLucJbUd8fp0nZBL6rzlPP01Qaz9VxO17P 607DhKslh4WZ+7qSk+z+PTuADaOoFu/bbDTbJ0o/ZgbyqpoGrcP9EtKJUQAeqafg GoV1NMGHvD5rLQag1ZoZKhK+syxbE1JS4nyS0L7bwREYXCHM1TvjvaTMLBM7Ssoh Cm989MgI8VtNMbINRF6KTWZtOBXu3SNJiyC/B5yCwrY+5U7OB6EZ6ezv1MN7pE9g 4Z3g/j+8xuOzodG/Pvp1tsDnczqeiwkJ57Qr4JurGXn1/QGPBJ5tbKciSTcr/lU1 j9OKGyPyZlh5ibdlnELbCiwZDT/xwoqyVs+R+TjkOOw1q/9/2/unHR7ZpYqnEzFU ITbfDFvM6YdWWvCGNVLy/iohK10zdUI3iBd6QRtj958ng5ml8hTApKJOUALTRUzy NDsqs7ofVckyItN71oJeayyLZ/jz7i5Ohgg4Bxoknoeq0rYIxC451kCsQRNfXY1p 2cZPr9+V0TiCVyoAzeaY =IC60 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MQrP7LFEIXAwwegWGqW6IwaAMSDn4e3gO-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Sep 9 04:44:17 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D02B59CC669 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 04:44:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from gw.catspoiler.org (unknown [IPv6:2602:304:b010:ef20::f2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "gw.catspoiler.org", Issuer "gw.catspoiler.org" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3D791397 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 04:44:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Received: from FreeBSD.org (mousie.catspoiler.org [192.168.101.2]) by gw.catspoiler.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t894i8pZ088435; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 21:44:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from truckman@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201509090444.t894i8pZ088435@gw.catspoiler.org> Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2015 21:44:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Don Lewis Subject: Re: Is there an equivalent of NO_EXTRACT? To: pkubaj@riseup.net cc: stephen@missouri.edu, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <55EFB74C.5090207@riseup.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=us-ascii X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 04:44:17 -0000 On 9 Sep, Piotr Kubaj wrote: > On 09/09/2015 00:58, Montgomery-Smith, Stephen wrote: >> I think EXTRACT_ONLY will do the equivalent of what you need. >> >> ________________________________________ >> From: owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org [owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org] on behalf of Piotr Kubaj [pkubaj@riseup.net] >> Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2015 4:44 PM >> To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org >> Subject: Is there an equivalent of NO_EXTRACT? >> >> I'm a maintainer of a few ports. For the next update I'm preparing, I >> want to make it possible to download some addons via options. The thing >> is, they are downloaded as-is. They are not meant to be extracted >> (although they are zips), since it's the program itself that manages it. >> Is there such a possibility? >> > No, EXTRACT_ONLY actually extracts distfiles. I don't want them to be > extracted, I want them to be copies as-is, since the installed port will > manage it itself, it even requires zips. The only solution I see is to > tar those distfiles and put them on a separate mirror. Is there any > better solution to this? Or maybe someone introduces NO_EXTRACT to > bsd.port.mk :) If you list the distfiles that you want to have automatically extracted in EXTRACT_ONLY, then it will leave the unlisted ones untouched. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Sep 9 05:00:18 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5934CA00031 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 05:00:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pkubaj@riseup.net) Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3A6AB1A1B; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 05:00:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pkubaj@riseup.net) Received: from piha.riseup.net (unknown [10.0.1.162]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6511CC0DB7; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 22:00:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1441774817; bh=QushdoZ0dZjf9Idkkj/d7nu6qBg4haXD9NIeVvaKWUk=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=BRLCgz1hftsKaoEvnjrlC2c3251ibBdcQNBNKJT1mFXzkUsY4TGJnCynnKmYjGwXZ lLIWaoPvvayOYO8W3OASv7BdNLDxxPFuXTKB1cuzjxgXPVkPhI7kY5rlP80nBnqiJc lkEu5E+XmQ9TQGlonb6Desei9RX6Lcp8XJOTJOGE= Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: pkubaj) with ESMTPSA id A1CE4140406 Subject: Re: Is there an equivalent of NO_EXTRACT? To: Don Lewis References: <201509090444.t894i8pZ088435@gw.catspoiler.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org From: Piotr Kubaj Message-ID: <55EFBCD8.6060206@riseup.net> Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 07:00:08 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201509090444.t894i8pZ088435@gw.catspoiler.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jwG7lJM9JkKeAtnOR7TsLxDBa3lDA7cT8" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at mx1.riseup.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 05:00:18 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --jwG7lJM9JkKeAtnOR7TsLxDBa3lDA7cT8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 09/09/2015 06:44, Don Lewis wrote: > If you list the distfiles that you want to have automatically extracted= > in EXTRACT_ONLY, then it will leave the unlisted ones untouched. But I want the other one to properly extract and compile. Does that mean I'd have to write my own extract: step? --jwG7lJM9JkKeAtnOR7TsLxDBa3lDA7cT8 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJV77zYAAoJEC9nKukRsfY+IlgQAMD52saYj/g4jHMY9RYi9kIH oT2NKflvyeg9qCedn00eRQm/5S1zltYfOrAc1f/PMBbHhrv7W3MKeRNx97Yh3nad 5evmS2cxj7hMyZJDEyBN8DlXOhG1aCTaRL5IRL/oRlqLxEwteblcDZtmCXhJmd29 Pl1BQ3eK2OrjTBjsJswcFchkTbz/p8mLskbxAZWhLWJLB4Y+XUDI/sy75PEdbu0C LOfEmXatbOVlCnsf+WZctxQlqfb6IGfan8UIsurHtFr6zvmxi9zyJwBe0GPaUNgA DOFPEEP16FhdepiBvYXf0PJH3/+6VcsyWUXppAdr9dDypuFhjeo87aJpoPJmOoHD XVQ/QveRz9gelEKG7yB1WtGrGeoGexX5GO+Lv4Osdf4kpOelM//pJFcga++RLZhQ PfFQjmpLxJbjMUQZuJQunslUxFcjhQ7FW9cxojlianbL1wtG1IzcvSY4ZwySyGJV neALPbtWS9wNYYzNf9ebU+noln05kc7YFhM9j2h1gX225tTEkyE1XpxLChNWPnX7 FkMAJdXL+gD5OS2QFZng+xiIJZ5ij3FVLUV8OwSFRgPuy/Rc9IuK0dpVndb0PfvB +TNu+kjSXyhJeScrjLq2I7yw5h/3WYCs94tQh/1gWtoNWFOgxFhs2r1fPHpFCukp pU61rENy8GRSJYkiS8AA =uGCe -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jwG7lJM9JkKeAtnOR7TsLxDBa3lDA7cT8-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Sep 9 05:07:48 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D49ADA003C2 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 05:07:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: from mail-yk0-x22a.google.com (mail-yk0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c07::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97F001D2D; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 05:07:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from woodsb02@gmail.com) Received: by ykdu9 with SMTP id u9so77749056ykd.2; Tue, 08 Sep 2015 22:07:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KPzA6jRuy833iPONNBsNJtBYrl6feB5WUyb/hBNYzVg=; b=H3c880PqCBlUM1iA7yY/IJwP+Js6Xy5+z4CKwuJOi9xNNxCS/n7XciETPp1JkB5TIe AePorc8zuBaOL/QcXLhqv4MplpoUb6qbeaRDMJ79/YJjhdET2Omu3xTqj/GQw55U4vzO tsYPRjbqr2Re4GEB8guVt/tETNqovwou1h40/cWYOAVFxAps2bYesbdmMqXCK8CQ8BaX YRhJ5FcvP+4h9k9R+Rfmmc32w2bF0YFpToqUT6okW883p3Ob/QJzXVUiKGge97JDGhUv BcnMyAo0tGyehuTX5Oo00WNrenLACSof+wLlEM5skaG+JkJhbkhCD/fFZFmX06grQnh/ j4Ag== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.129.56.139 with SMTP id f133mr34878078ywa.61.1441775267713; Tue, 08 Sep 2015 22:07:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.31.96.79 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 22:07:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <55EFBCD8.6060206@riseup.net> References: <201509090444.t894i8pZ088435@gw.catspoiler.org> <55EFBCD8.6060206@riseup.net> Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 07:07:47 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is there an equivalent of NO_EXTRACT? From: Ben Woods To: Piotr Kubaj Cc: Don Lewis , FreeBSD ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 05:07:48 -0000 On 9 September 2015 at 07:00, Piotr Kubaj wrote: > On 09/09/2015 06:44, Don Lewis wrote: >> If you list the distfiles that you want to have automatically extracted >> in EXTRACT_ONLY, then it will leave the unlisted ones untouched. > But I want the other one to properly extract and compile. Does that mean > I'd have to write my own extract: step? No need to write your own extract: step. EXTRACT_ONLY will do what you need. A quote from the Porter's handbook: 5.4.6. EXTRACT_ONLY If only some of the DISTFILES must be extracted=E2=80=94for example, one of them is the source code, while another is an uncompressed document=E2=80=94list the filenames that must be extracted in EXTRACT_ONLY. DISTFILES=3D source.tar.gz manual.html EXTRACT_ONLY=3D source.tar.gz When none of the DISTFILES need to be uncompressed, set EXTRACT_ONLY to the empty string. EXTRACT_ONLY=3D Hope that clears it up for you. Cheers, Ben From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Sep 9 05:09:57 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38BEAA004D2 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 05:09:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pkubaj@riseup.net) Received: from mx1.riseup.net (mx1.riseup.net [198.252.153.129]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1886D1DF6 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 05:09:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pkubaj@riseup.net) Received: from piha.riseup.net (unknown [10.0.1.162]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.riseup.net", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.riseup.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B70DC19C3; Tue, 8 Sep 2015 22:09:56 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=riseup.net; s=squak; t=1441775396; bh=mdPWkAY+Ju/fr+x2R/ljd1P0iuxMxSeh5NzvDnkdOUA=; h=Subject:To:References:Cc:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=dZxM7qIQMaEsRqltqBLSkX/WCrI1awOwfl6ozaIKrj/Q4NlG6akERhZYmd320AaKP EA9rMBP6/oZyIbF2WASHsMESCdl7OroRf78VIuEd3/2BHnHdyJDD/5aLSz/mUQrli2 wH3NLxwVAaooE5sy8MMvWv0w5NuoqgiSSywm4VyM= Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: pkubaj) with ESMTPSA id 9E618140E50 Subject: Re: Is there an equivalent of NO_EXTRACT? To: Ben Woods References: <201509090444.t894i8pZ088435@gw.catspoiler.org> <55EFBCD8.6060206@riseup.net> Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org From: Piotr Kubaj Message-ID: <55EFBF1E.10507@riseup.net> Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 07:09:50 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="UHaRj6KU2VxaAqNLmaGHvw8NBnb5JuS10" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at mx1.riseup.net X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 05:09:57 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --UHaRj6KU2VxaAqNLmaGHvw8NBnb5JuS10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 09/09/2015 07:07, Ben Woods wrote: > On 9 September 2015 at 07:00, Piotr Kubaj wrote: >> On 09/09/2015 06:44, Don Lewis wrote: >>> If you list the distfiles that you want to have automatically extract= ed >>> in EXTRACT_ONLY, then it will leave the unlisted ones untouched. >> But I want the other one to properly extract and compile. Does that me= an >> I'd have to write my own extract: step? >=20 > No need to write your own extract: step. EXTRACT_ONLY will do what you > need. A quote from the Porter's handbook: >=20 > 5.4.6. EXTRACT_ONLY >=20 > If only some of the DISTFILES must be extracted=E2=80=94for example, on= e of > them is the source code, while another is an uncompressed > document=E2=80=94list the filenames that must be extracted in EXTRACT_O= NLY. >=20 > DISTFILES=3D source.tar.gz manual.html > EXTRACT_ONLY=3D source.tar.gz >=20 > When none of the DISTFILES need to be uncompressed, set EXTRACT_ONLY > to the empty string. >=20 > EXTRACT_ONLY=3D >=20 >=20 > Hope that clears it up for you. >=20 > Cheers, > Ben >=20 Thanks! I've searched the porter's handbook, but I guess I didn't notice it :( --UHaRj6KU2VxaAqNLmaGHvw8NBnb5JuS10 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJV778eAAoJEC9nKukRsfY+pjsQAL5xt9AJGqgLpIFjvzoS35Kj /ayU1+mw16auXKQ2Gs6kBxfUk3AB3RCRJtM244VGxW9uAgiL5NOucF2b345zCisV AiDHrBCJajYIzc/gRY3kVB6zAWxWCb5w1o7UPcfsrF7YgKjQqyOrUsdneyKTNQSS lpu66D9GaaUvhAwLGKGlTA/1p2WfVUOURxWS2U/TEcasGtyAxEznY7TQcPHIWr4v FaPnLjE0elmUqPF+mUqsZ2x1LTf8JmXrcjLXY6fO/PKJvfUNFxq0+hG8nBFvI6VG E4DAAHuhqawC7hc+mJlWGKptI/ITyioTzMGlr4eCT/Q3XIK9qLi27OQneQb0FOwv k4ikpZC3PQgl8vwnmHadrVNN7JnhO0U39eBZOQwPwmGI3bO9yZsP1/uIcVzT773w fDUyl3k5wLQJzaBRwD2TvcgrPKebeIEZhgR+zDQ15qJobt7tQaocgZJOC+kEMgRm zDhuCjsk6rmiRcvR+tBsksoTXPUICZ3Qxcalb/lM/f/QCkf43k27iFLDWla3diiA fh0tqQ5KGoNHqsePNcSRtoceLvYPMarlv20SygMmmHeho3clIWeD5Odm1/seEf9y E+7ox+oW6LvVyr8p6A1QoNLLpZss+RZO9Ssc11ZM3PR92nTMDvJqBcTh5pFwSxAU 1nK3Pg1X6H2F7Uyobbi1 =95bE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --UHaRj6KU2VxaAqNLmaGHvw8NBnb5JuS10-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Sep 9 12:51:45 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48F1EA019C9 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 12:51:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3273E12CB for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 12:51:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 31FE7A019C8; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 12:51:45 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 319C1A019C7 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 12:51:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2251312C7 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 12:51:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t89CpjML087303 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 12:51:45 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id t89CpjOl087301; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 12:51:45 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201509091251.t89CpjOl087301@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 12:51:44 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 12:51:45 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/pear-PHP_CodeSniffer | 2.3.3 | 2.3.4 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ devel/ucommon | 6.1.11 | 6.6.0 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ www/pear-twig | 1.21.1 | 1.21.2 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ www/pecl-twig | 1.21.1 | 1.21.2 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Sep 9 13:27:58 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB8989CCEA0 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 13:27:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@toco-domains.de) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A59951E13 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 13:27:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@toco-domains.de) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A30A29CCE9F; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 13:27:58 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A29D09CCE9C for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 13:27:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@toco-domains.de) Received: from toco-domains.de (unknown [IPv6:2a01:4f8:150:50a5::6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6CF2D1E11 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 13:27:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mailinglists@toco-domains.de) Received: from [0.0.0.0] (unknown [IPv6:2a01:4f8:150:50a5::6]) by toco-domains.de (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 7B6F21B228DB for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 15:27:55 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date To: ports@freebsd.org References: <201509091251.t89CpjOl087301@portscout.freebsd.org> From: Torsten Zuehlsdorff Message-ID: <55F033DB.50607@toco-domains.de> Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 15:27:55 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <201509091251.t89CpjOl087301@portscout.freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 13:27:58 -0000 Hello, > Port | Current version | New version > ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ > devel/pear-PHP_CodeSniffer | 2.3.3 | 2.3.4 > ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ I took this one: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202991 Greetings, Torsten From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Sep 9 14:00:02 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C84D1A01372 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 14:00:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3C201035 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 14:00:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B1502A01371; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 14:00:02 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0EDAA01370 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 14:00:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E0F61034 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 14:00:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZfus-0004QI-66; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 16:00:02 +0200 Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 16:00:02 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Torsten Zuehlsdorff Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date Message-ID: <20150909140002.GG36682@home.opsec.eu> References: <201509091251.t89CpjOl087301@portscout.freebsd.org> <55F033DB.50607@toco-domains.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55F033DB.50607@toco-domains.de> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 14:00:02 -0000 Hi! > I took this one: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202991 Done. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Sep 9 15:19:17 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D5C7A00F81 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 15:19:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E311E5A for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 15:19:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 47873A00F7E; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 15:19:17 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47224A00F7D for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 15:19:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com (mail-wi0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7A5A1E59 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 15:19:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: by wicge5 with SMTP id ge5so159506508wic.0 for ; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 08:19:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=khera.org; s=google11; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=WczCaONqB8zOA//uCq1miMztyfzniR4JIbMBgVO2pkg=; b=E23w08pQJ5ZxtjqLoPrJcNB9r5hFc6DaP+EYNKE8ZoVe2B57vlNc2KzNNh3NbdS5Tv n/rkOjI8W1796OD0pwzCCZEpSbudu+hBaRbY/5Gv7RowiUmHZan9fHHwq3cUzdl+a26k RTULBaXJVIuscLZ7MOAdM4oMjikeYidiE5sWU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=WczCaONqB8zOA//uCq1miMztyfzniR4JIbMBgVO2pkg=; b=Gt5lZ+CfXraWhDht4/J8YfcRkWuwtLygzXojeftvgEQ4vvsZWCD6dupzjD91xqujuq iLEZxBaC+ZWVehSKruDy+uwyB8xWdse5dD5FO3g+ppObho0JFmZ4eJ3ORj0M9yTuXsah 6AyiHQFnyiGMF/ZTCh1U44Ym5roo968btywoPccC00ElpDvCvS5XQg+pEyTcpOjzJqQK Sy1qmWjNASIZkTJKNBHLXO6kQiq0h3lkQSp/Q42dmE4wi5oS1oQgVZ9+fyzlM8vYEoMl jnnhV/zdFvNJZFOJWu7J1R8QhUCEYR6HQoGuNI3suJF/54zM5aU5OHoRvwG6Rd85V8c7 wYXw== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk9J3u5DFqaojbrNm+Gcjia+ErhoIAQooMmWnffnV7ULAzvGIbFEaAV0kfgTq3ZLxTEvdx8 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.181.13.228 with SMTP id fb4mr58862429wid.10.1441811955055; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 08:19:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.28.45.67 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 08:19:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 11:19:14 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: unable to boostrap go From: Vick Khera To: FreeBSD Ports List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 15:19:17 -0000 On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 10:43 AM, Vick Khera wrote: > I build my own customized packages using poudriere. Lately (roughy about > when go changed from 1.4 to 1.5) it cannot build the go 1.4.2 bootstrap. It > fails with a bus error. This also is roughly about the time I upgraded my > poudriere server from 10.1 to 10.2. I've traced this down to my specific kernel configuration. I took the go binaries built with the 10.1 kernel and they do indeed coredump with "bus error" when run on the 10.2 kernel. Both kernels were built with the same configuration file. When I use a GENERIC 10.2 kernel, those same binaries do not dump core when running "go version". Does anyone know what specific kernel config option/device go is now needs in the 10.2 kernel that was allowed in the 10.1 kernel by default? It is failing here according to gdb: (gdb) where #0 0x00000000004a8af7 in runtime.sysctl () at /usr/local/go/src/runtime/sys_freebsd_amd64.s:299 #1 0x0000000000499798 in getncpu () at /usr/local/go/src/runtime/os_freebsd.c:35 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Sep 9 16:02:37 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8494D9CC622 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 16:02:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F5CF1BE1 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 16:02:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 5C49F9CC621; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 16:02:37 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 410109CC620 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 16:02:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: from mail-wi0-x22e.google.com (mail-wi0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C290E1BE0 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 16:02:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vivek@khera.org) Received: by wicge5 with SMTP id ge5so161083061wic.0 for ; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 09:02:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=khera.org; s=google11; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=Oam5s7yIU8gRBKKnZ0suxctamtCg6BZDhKZ6yM2BfcM=; b=BQH1njyOWzqA+KL96OO79JpBjqf9FWph3+3fGzdHdV17bjJUrm6nmaaD8T0tGwzGyH XlQzA00xS/c136X11p4eXtTHeefqEId5DYEWGKuzmrhkEkEr+Vt2UtlbHxnIVG/qqZQ7 2hKA8PsG7j96ZSlWLGExFI2M4CayVEhnXficQ= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Oam5s7yIU8gRBKKnZ0suxctamtCg6BZDhKZ6yM2BfcM=; b=MEyUEXEmof5fzbQOLcPc4XlRhE2ARnGcZutvBTff5GnfifoGJlTifVoBusyxfMLrQx ccgbaYqA0+IHhsClWYeLqFoZV4hh9TkIiJmG7YRVq/tRMvu2gNc46rOMRxB0jpA+Es/1 U5uwZ/utF6HHFyOXfYzsFd858mmTrSuFAZ7pCubxjsjfYKAdretOz92+Mb8KNNEqOz89 X+f0splHiAUpbw1UW0bdV7askI4P+x3zo1BpFMRTNMFLk0pHXdoAZoQlF+Lvm/xgQbz+ 66HNiGdbTx7BTsJnTc+M+GXkn3dO5HoLpeOJEbbeq+d8jbaNDPsP1j1Pc+YEUHU8aESb tSvg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkjUSAllA4vZ/bQ6fV75QeQYVpAvZ0Ek1GJStbX3vMgpcE9U8r8Qevc29pa1WWSk1UsCp/S MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.246.136 with SMTP id xw8mr59972163wjc.42.1441814555023; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 09:02:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.28.45.67 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 09:02:34 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 12:02:34 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: unable to boostrap go From: Vick Khera To: FreeBSD Ports List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 16:02:37 -0000 On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 11:19 AM, Vick Khera wrote: > When I use a GENERIC 10.2 kernel, those same binaries do not dump core > when running "go version". > > Does anyone know what specific kernel config option/device go is now needs > in the 10.2 kernel that was allowed in the 10.1 kernel by default? It is > failing here according to gdb: > Found the trick. Go *requires* COMPAT_FREEBSD32 in the kernel. My 10.1 and 10.2 configs referenced an included file that differed in that respect, and once I restored that it started working. I had missed that file comparison earlier. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Sep 9 18:14:46 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CED90A01A83 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 18:14:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qk0-x231.google.com (mail-qk0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91C8D1100 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 18:14:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: by qkdw123 with SMTP id w123so8214319qkd.0 for ; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 11:14:45 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=lYanAMvBSeIUr8Wbrmn2C798lhmtKibPZDEa34jI+sM=; b=vjLJQ21+Qb/UjN01YKL4qFH42OLN782lRJ8SVG5ytEhTis2EXR/HNkq6YHIz5OqUwn n7ttCtHmcS9b21usAIi8ugDaTFNRi15ELol2T6StqkngZsHl0uGPpJJh+twIAsrEpB4I TDezsGs/P5h2a9PWC9gRFqDNa5xPYqsR+8Kl/gek7pRaQM7D8oliahd1PkjyIqlYC8Hu J04MrqKywQGUG1ZPmIEHmXjv6tAvFXQ5gT745gjx9VTiPvYxCUOMOgOVzGog7Q2EZdc4 +BxqPxmPeEellL0veUShZibbY5UKufL7k6Crt2UzsGOnibjU+dTBH00YN5q4QYT4yW0T lpMw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.55.26.4 with SMTP id a4mr47141128qka.8.1441822485590; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 11:14:45 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.55.204.207 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 11:14:45 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 20:14:45 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Looking for a committer From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=C3=ADa?= To: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 18:14:46 -0000 Please, can a committer have a look at this? https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202752 Thanks in advance. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Sep 9 18:21:23 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78D2CA01E2A for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 18:21:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 153FF15D9 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 18:21:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZjzl-0004mi-TW; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 20:21:21 +0200 Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 20:21:21 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Fernando =?iso-8859-1?Q?Apestegu=EDa?= Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Looking for a committer Message-ID: <20150909182121.GH36682@home.opsec.eu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 18:21:23 -0000 Hi! > Please, can a committer have a look at this? > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202752 It fails to fetch ? Any ideas ? ===> visualparadigm-12.2.20150820 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found => Visual_Paradigm_CE_12_2_20150820_Unix_InstallFree.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. => Attempting to fetch http://eu6.visual-paradigm.com/visual-paradigm/vpce12.2/20150820/Visual_Paradigm_CE_12_2_20150820_Unix_InstallFree.tar.gz fetch: http://eu6.visual-paradigm.com/visual-paradigm/vpce12.2/20150820/Visual_Paradigm_CE_12_2_20150820_Unix_InstallFree.tar.gz: Not Found => Attempting to fetch http://distcache.FreeBSD.org/ports-distfiles/Visual_Paradigm_CE_12_2_20150820_Unix_InstallFree.tar.gz fetch: http://distcache.FreeBSD.org/ports-distfiles/Visual_Paradigm_CE_12_2_20150820_Unix_InstallFree.tar.gz: Not Found -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Sep 9 18:27:15 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 270AA9CD0AD for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 18:27:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qg0-x232.google.com (mail-qg0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA0B81AA9 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 18:27:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: by qgx61 with SMTP id 61so15460312qgx.3 for ; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 11:27:14 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=f0RCZvvtzkwhC6v+Bo6kUqyspZZOVtJRihGOtNXxKYE=; b=gCMsp7UIKdSX8qch0BCJ71kQIwTHfEtUv04aYAGzwkFgFu7OBb5V+g/JmbF/GIvqwN V9I1Pbtg6RHAwFRat4Ur/mzqhb7mMCJpmr5B3qIsRYvhOkX6XoHNRVUROe/27wIiylyD SITa76IaWsdOONcJVg2kPFsWWsmQJ2Dvv0wkcMtsloL8RkL54QCjFQCpNAfRncuHTgwE QKgrBBlH4EbtbtthX/9I+0tQiIzsBKIeNSWODV+V4fXBf2g6LTWN+Kr2gI/28WJCorl+ x5BU45ySrNH/kYu8I/NM03KPyD7TBNyIgYeuFmrG7WyWiRERJppedrOrGRTSHLIo1CCO niRQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.141.28.2 with SMTP id f2mr45506233qhe.59.1441823233903; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 11:27:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.55.204.207 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 11:27:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150909182121.GH36682@home.opsec.eu> References: <20150909182121.GH36682@home.opsec.eu> Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 20:27:13 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Looking for a committer From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=C3=ADa?= To: Kurt Jaeger Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 18:27:15 -0000 On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 8:21 PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >> Please, can a committer have a look at this? >> >> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202752 > > It fails to fetch ? Any ideas ? I suppose it's because they released the new version (20150902) and removed the old one. This project has a funny record of doing things like that, re-rolling releases so the checksum fails, etc... I'll update the patch and be back to you. Thanks! > > ===> visualparadigm-12.2.20150820 depends on file: /usr/local/sbin/pkg - found > => Visual_Paradigm_CE_12_2_20150820_Unix_InstallFree.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/distfiles/. > => Attempting to fetch http://eu6.visual-paradigm.com/visual-paradigm/vpce12.2/20150820/Visual_Paradigm_CE_12_2_20150820_Unix_InstallFree.tar.gz > fetch: http://eu6.visual-paradigm.com/visual-paradigm/vpce12.2/20150820/Visual_Paradigm_CE_12_2_20150820_Unix_InstallFree.tar.gz: Not Found > => Attempting to fetch http://distcache.FreeBSD.org/ports-distfiles/Visual_Paradigm_CE_12_2_20150820_Unix_InstallFree.tar.gz > fetch: http://distcache.FreeBSD.org/ports-distfiles/Visual_Paradigm_CE_12_2_20150820_Unix_InstallFree.tar.gz: Not Found > > -- > pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Sep 9 18:35:50 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 790539CD54A for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 18:35:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32D141EDB for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 18:35:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pi@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZkDn-0004oU-Es; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 20:35:51 +0200 Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 20:35:51 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Fernando =?iso-8859-1?Q?Apestegu=EDa?= Cc: Kurt Jaeger , FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Looking for a committer Message-ID: <20150909183551.GI36682@home.opsec.eu> References: <20150909182121.GH36682@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 18:35:50 -0000 Hi! > > It fails to fetch ? Any ideas ? > > I suppose it's because they released the new version (20150902) and > removed the old one. If this is all, I've changed and started the make makesum. 250 MB distfile... > This project has a funny record of doing things > like that, re-rolling releases so the checksum fails, etc... > > I'll update the patch and be back to you. If only the YYYYMMDD changed, I can handle it. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Sep 9 18:53:56 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A5759CDFCE for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 18:53:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qg0-x22f.google.com (mail-qg0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EE4BB195A for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 18:53:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: by qgez77 with SMTP id z77so16263168qge.1 for ; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 11:53:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=Bhby7ZfdvSoQrDTqdLgw7QbAlCGcqe3Ya0a2NyLfhBA=; b=WWZlcEBTyXl1L3xVcclruyr0M7CniJVG2j/ZRV6JqRLHBC7XGoydkw0rlUbPJ+nZMs 8/q4u4VIyNkOXX2/zr/xdgjj23UA4Ah2OFV2j7wSY54C58kImZ/nHUk0ttsgLA1kilXZ HUA0vEPcvoyNb/2e/leB4jMCn1FWuesZd/kmr6u6B2zhNkI729y0CqIASUEJcaix58Yt UHuG6cGh6EL22tvBdcXR5b7e06lViPLJTSAtECA5iX+W4C58G9MaOjEHZbzYdSSEh52p EvlpKcStVWXzEZKeTRzZBanj3Z/BkkBwYV8GJxN+4lQh/lNZl7ASmg52PsBa97DxKMLg y8qQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.93.139 with SMTP id d11mr2886157qge.83.1441824834988; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 11:53:54 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.55.204.207 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 11:53:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150909183551.GI36682@home.opsec.eu> References: <20150909182121.GH36682@home.opsec.eu> <20150909183551.GI36682@home.opsec.eu> Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 20:53:54 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Looking for a committer From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=C3=ADa?= To: Kurt Jaeger Cc: Kurt Jaeger , FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 18:53:56 -0000 On Wed, Sep 9, 2015 at 8:35 PM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >> > It fails to fetch ? Any ideas ? >> >> I suppose it's because they released the new version (20150902) and >> removed the old one. > > If this is all, I've changed and started the make makesum. > 250 MB distfile... > >> This project has a funny record of doing things >> like that, re-rolling releases so the checksum fails, etc... >> >> I'll update the patch and be back to you. > > If only the YYYYMMDD changed, I can handle it. That seems to be the case. The pkg-plist doesn't change either. Successfully built for {9.3,10.2}amd64 I updated the PR. > > -- > pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Sep 9 19:52:24 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A29BA01E75 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 19:52:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E868A17D9 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 19:52:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ZZlPu-0004vg-1G; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 21:52:26 +0200 Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 21:52:25 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Fernando =?iso-8859-1?Q?Apestegu=EDa?= Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: Looking for a committer Message-ID: <20150909195225.GJ36682@home.opsec.eu> References: <20150909182121.GH36682@home.opsec.eu> <20150909183551.GI36682@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 19:52:24 -0000 Hi! > That seems to be the case. The pkg-plist doesn't change either. > Successfully built for {9.3,10.2}amd64 > > I updated the PR. Test-builds done on cur 93a 10a 10i. Committed, thanks. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Sep 9 20:03:15 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 183A1A0043A for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 20:03:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qg0-x22c.google.com (mail-qg0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c04::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C65111F89 for ; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 20:03:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fernando.apesteguia@gmail.com) Received: by qgt47 with SMTP id 47so17959582qgt.2 for ; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 13:03:13 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=nQQ41rV2d5Hh8ib+186ESBGLXDlg6o51PCR+VYF+wyg=; b=Y4HxmODBZ6rzNwAMIV92UqKc1++3dlr+T/5xKxhi7hzxUkdHevlarkICXJqSOwXTvU kg3zGEgQp8tUN04J3evaI9c7fwCFbcqbWJ02LycH/mo+n97INrKjRN1E1aDfGF9pmhlB aFfkxGv0x2J2T6CV6HQ5WeYCtDb6k4f9Rz3pdQbUUtWpSQvbjPNDxA5HqHWs1fNHUlSV +Yc7OAwmfaSw7iLiZhRQ9K1PiBMGCKHvEF+MUyzaAiPVKJjriBornCN7DA7WmNI6aIhn whNa+ukWMe+aAaPiE3+KWk/wVu26VNdeROjC1npyQV66d6kt3/N/WbnYjv2lets5cHSr +YFg== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.140.100.182 with SMTP id s51mr30315028qge.25.1441828993658; Wed, 09 Sep 2015 13:03:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.55.204.207 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 13:03:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.55.204.207 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Sep 2015 13:03:13 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20150909195225.GJ36682@home.opsec.eu> References: <20150909182121.GH36682@home.opsec.eu> <20150909183551.GI36682@home.opsec.eu> <20150909195225.GJ36682@home.opsec.eu> Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 22:03:13 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Looking for a committer From: =?UTF-8?Q?Fernando_Apestegu=C3=ADa?= To: Kurt Jaeger Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 20:03:15 -0000 El 09/09/2015 21:52, "Kurt Jaeger" escribi=C3=B3: > > Hi! > > > That seems to be the case. The pkg-plist doesn't change either. > > Successfully built for {9.3,10.2}amd64 > > > > I updated the PR. > > Test-builds done on cur 93a 10a 10i. > > Committed, thanks. Thanks! > > -- > pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Sep 10 13:54:17 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BDC59CD9E8 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 13:54:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@skew.org) Received: from chilled.skew.org (chilled.skew.org [70.90.116.205]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.skew.org", Issuer "AlphaSSL CA - SHA256 - G2" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 29A211891 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 13:54:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mike@skew.org) Received: from chilled.skew.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chilled.skew.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id t8ADsF8N013753 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 07:54:15 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from mike@chilled.skew.org) Received: (from mike@localhost) by chilled.skew.org (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id t8ADsFg6013752 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 07:54:15 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from mike) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 07:54:14 -0600 From: Mike Brown To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: 'too many errors' when compiling mysql56-client yassl code Message-ID: <20150910135414.GA13663@chilled.skew.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline X-Whoa: whoa. User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 13:54:17 -0000 I'm trying to build mysql56-server from the ports collection, and during the build of the yassl part of mysql56-client, compilation aborts due to too many errors. Here's the relevant output: http://pastebin.com/raw.php?i=kXaDDJJY The problems seem to be in the source code, but I don't understand why no one else has reported it, if that's really the problem. This is on my BeagleBone Black (armv6) running the latest FreeBSD 10.2 snapshot: FreeBSD-10.2-STABLE-arm-armv6-BEAGLEBONE-20150903-r287435.img.xz from ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/snapshots/arm/armv6/ISO-IMAGES/10.2/ I did a 'portsnap fetch extract' and installed a few ports successfully, and all I'm doing now is 'portmaster -d databases/mysql56-server'. Is there something else I need to do? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Sep 10 15:27:33 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADFC1A00634 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 15:27:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Albert.Shih@obspm.fr) Received: from mx-m2.obspm.fr (mx-m2.obspm.fr [145.238.186.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "*.obspm.fr", Issuer "TERENA SSL CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 547F9198B for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 15:27:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Albert.Shih@obspm.fr) Received: from pcjas.obspm.fr (pcjas.obspm.fr [145.238.184.233]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx-m2.obspm.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/DIO Observatoire de Paris - 15/04/10) with ESMTP id t8AFRMDX036525 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 17:27:23 +0200 Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 17:26:46 +0200 From: Albert Shih To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: nagios-plugins 2.1.1 segmentation fault Message-ID: <20150910152646.GA73222@pcjas.obspm.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.9 (mx-m2.obspm.fr [145.238.186.20]); Thu, 10 Sep 2015 17:27:24 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at mx-m2.obspm.fr X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 15:27:33 -0000 Hi, I find a bug about nagios-plugins-2.1.1 I don't known if it's the freebsd-ports version or it's about the plugins himself. Anyway if you do a check_http host where the host didn't answer but can be reach (apache not running) you get a Segmentation fault and a core dump. Easy to try check_http 127.0.0.1 Regards. JAS -- Albert SHIH DIO bâtiment 15 Observatoire de Paris 5 Place Jules Janssen 92195 Meudon Cedex France Téléphone : +33 1 45 07 76 26/+33 6 86 69 95 71 xmpp: jas@obspm.fr Heure local/Local time: jeu 10 sep 2015 17:24:38 CEST From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Sep 10 15:52:11 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 226BDA0153A for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 15:52:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi0-x229.google.com (mail-oi0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD9061874 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 15:52:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by oiev17 with SMTP id v17so26946406oie.1 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 08:52:10 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=xw6552NdMYi9aY9KFN9tObqJQW+w6tfrlPryiVSI4DU=; b=z92IfOzJkLEGqEGZ6QOHAxd9p+jpwwHXLGe8CpiYymF2+CdCL7/5b0RBubI9cW2e+p XGbwDwb+aVhKtFa05DwaHzjkGCYxXWxsNO0AGvnnqarhVEAz1MO8eiozuN9pAhY0f/z3 wsbizanQlQNqMaowIRtwBLKalWPxaWSGHwaF0rLoX78uGor5aVlm+gpnzGvVUaQEeM72 VibHULLxGJsgoF4ECVHDgHDaHS9Z7xiYviPDYdyS3Lrb9kKYkK+A9EDYWNRm/zYyurRi MZxoAcvchbuyspQaN+ZvwlUFiNdTrAiGg8mXqRq6YHgG7Igh/XBiG368Gd2sZIRHo8yy w8ew== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.202.240.70 with SMTP id o67mr31551076oih.87.1441900330206; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 08:52:10 -0700 (PDT) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.202.102.9 with HTTP; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 08:52:10 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 08:52:10 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: DdU4QXyQKb8P279lYLZ5CtUVkw0 Message-ID: Subject: svn.freebsd.org does not so "happy eyes" or even fail-over from IPv6 to IPv4 From: Kevin Oberman To: FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 15:52:11 -0000 Today I was unable to update my ports repo. I kept getting timeouts from svn.freebsd.org. After some troubleshooting I discovered that IPv6 was down. Some sort of Comcast issue that was successful in configuring my router for IPv6 , but not actually providing IPv6 service. (In all honesty, I suspect the IPv6 code in my D-Link router.) In any case, IPv4 was up and running, but svn seems to fail to aver try the IPv4 address. pkg (on other systems) did connect via IPv4 to update packages after a long delay for the IPv6 access to timeout, but svn simply failed. Is this an issue with the subversion client or with the FreeBSD geoDNS setup? I now have IPv6 running after rebooting both my cable modem and my router, but this really should just work. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Sep 10 16:01:49 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63BEFA0193B for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 16:01:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@freebsd.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:3cd3:cd67:fafa:3d78]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0E39E1F7F for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 16:01:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@freebsd.org) Received: from ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com (no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id t8AG1c5U053664 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO) for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2015 17:01:38 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from matthew@freebsd.org) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=freebsd.org DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk t8AG1c5U053664 Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/t8AG1c5U053664; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral X-Authentication-Warning: lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk: Host no-reverse-dns.metronet-uk.com [85.199.232.226] (may be forged) claimed to be ox-dell39.ox.adestra.com Subject: Re: svn.freebsd.org does not so "happy eyes" or even fail-over from IPv6 to IPv4 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: From: Matthew Seaman X-Enigmail-Draft-Status: N1110 Message-ID: <55F1A95C.7080105@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 17:01:32 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="nAtBPU5o3LcEVAFk7oP9Q8bfdU2NbKrHg" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on lucid-nonsense.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2015 16:01:49 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --nAtBPU5o3LcEVAFk7oP9Q8bfdU2NbKrHg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 09/10/15 16:52, Kevin Oberman wrote: > Today I was unable to update my ports repo. I kept getting timeouts fro= m > svn.freebsd.org. After some troubleshooting I discovered that IPv6 was > down. Some sort of Comcast issue that was successful in configuring my > router for IPv6 , but not actually providing IPv6 service. (In all hone= sty, > I suspect the IPv6 code in my D-Link router.) >=20 > In any case, IPv4 was up and running, but svn seems to fail to aver try= the > IPv4 address. pkg (on other systems) did connect via IPv4 to update > packages after a long delay for the IPv6 access to timeout, but svn sim= ply > failed. >=20 > Is this an issue with the subversion client or with the FreeBSD geoDNS > setup? >=20 > I now have IPv6 running after rebooting both my cable modem and my rout= er, > but this really should just work. It's likely a problem with Internet connectivity affecting traffic between different bits of the FreeBSD cluster. This is expected, and due to a bunch of network hardware being replaced right about now. Give it a few hours and try again. Cheers Matthew --nAtBPU5o3LcEVAFk7oP9Q8bfdU2NbKrHg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJV8alcAAoJEABRPxDgqeTnOB4P/1Xpq7Mu73PpT5AKnGs1cKA3 RxsjVzb5/1MfzQ+//Wfp5OKEuuAF5wvBRiOgeo8UR7rpOMNgXTtTgiuA8qr+0ern A9Mi3kBO/6d2Z0QK/vsutZmHR2RQETPYZ0VZEiv2EG10YUKqNV0tBZ5WNMla/DjU EVi+PMqInsPV9PJE/y1/0S1O/+UWOP6k9+F0oZ74tp/AVN1udYWm/nzsflXLqvtK BF5N3fBMrHjC2NtVHWBXuwobbVm49bwCGTI2KvpNbcyI4vRHvhY3AO+y9S/PeWh+ E6KI0gv07yo3XOvO/8QzOtgx297yUDypVcKta4giPaOv3EExTrINBN+74OKsndh/ gIx0LpvPMKb0BMekm1px0pLe6fA7fU0saAUfMoajo9dJzMFVDCPoj25iaY2X2lyO RGp405PbGw4ICnZ46dW1nP4n8M/oc8c2cxlum01AmczgtkG6p7EaKVjtoqTvbGWN GjN0DjxVbRoBHfYhplZ35QKAXckxlxXGyTC64Db0gNitOuHsOuWCVdTZcYlblGUC 8kvs5BLhdSHHzdHUChZbxTEkMk09emKHjXk1OTxt7lsWE6LuYVaB8wILKY7278xx fq9leN7NZ72x27lMYEQRPCZVKBmz4KZMU1uFbu+te0n2UxyWY4zDBPvoYHy7KWC/ K66gloF9g7f9L+ate3Ie =68et -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nAtBPU5o3LcEVAFk7oP9Q8bfdU2NbKrHg-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Sep 11 07:19:01 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAF60A0023D for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 07:19:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (prod2.absolight.net [79.143.243.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A42C41A25 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 07:19:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F309BDC4C; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:18:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from atuin.in.mat.cc (atuin.in.mat.cc [79.143.241.205]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 1B54FBDC1F; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:18:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by atuin.in.mat.cc (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBD7E42B49C0; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:18:52 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:18:52 +0200 From: Mathieu Arnold To: Albert Shih , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nagios-plugins 2.1.1 segmentation fault Message-ID: <1F80D3C17D9ABA2903628A86@atuin.in.mat.cc> In-Reply-To: <20150910152646.GA73222@pcjas.obspm.fr> References: <20150910152646.GA73222@pcjas.obspm.fr> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Mac OS X) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="==========F8D6BC9452A54C9AC2EB==========" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 07:19:01 -0000 --==========F8D6BC9452A54C9AC2EB========== Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline +--On 10 septembre 2015 17:26:46 +0200 Albert Shih wrote: | Hi, | | I find a bug about nagios-plugins-2.1.1 I don't known if it's the | freebsd-ports version or it's about the plugins himself. Anyway if you do | a | | check_http host | | where the host didn't answer but can be reach (apache not running) you get | a Segmentation fault and a core dump. | | Easy to try | | check_http 127.0.0.1 | | Regards. Hi, I can't reproduce this: # /usr/local/libexec/nagios/check_http 127.0.0.1 HTTP OK: HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently - 491 bytes in 0.001 second response time |time=0.000816s;;;0.000000 size=491B;;;0 Note that using check_http that way is some old legacy way of doing it, you should run it as: # /usr/local/libexec/nagios/check_http -H 127.0.0.1 HTTP OK: HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently - 491 bytes in 0.000 second response time |time=0.000367s;;;0.000000 size=491B;;;0 Regards, -- Mathieu Arnold --==========F8D6BC9452A54C9AC2EB========== Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJV8oBcXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQzQUI2OTc4OUQyRUQxMjEwNjQ0MEJBNUIz QTQ1MTZGMzUxODNDRTQ4AAoJEDpFFvNRg85I/cMP/jOh/W5M+of95K3t6PhBdUlS WA1F9x8IFthVYT881hmpthRMDrGwE7zmp04bMJCuLQuE797uvqHUtSf91nst7OSQ iBfD/Ae2fNjd5lXY93gs33z+GhmtkakTdgQ4XsAaibxGYpmTMi1t3oDKnp+zyacJ 7k4sBknT+2Ny+d2qF73nOcobsrc1DLIpaeLJUuoGEg16+PYx+CkZ5sr4RHHXKwxR 40HBGY7wq48YF794oJ7QQyFHMXIT9w03Rk9RZtsCennrflb899jHT9Ina4dS53dL LLW8LGpDuSzHvHv0waYfgTvsp6prs83Mdp73GWnOtbEVeQ6pDoNa2FEaKLxGlpdA dC+aKwTGDWbbZLjZ5XsRafPMglaVILk9WaDhu5V8EVs+oznd0dTyDE0mbzbg2ufS QujZusEJ7aFVHcaoq8WkUmMEWS5eJmP7k83MoQSYeaXAy4Apvfpu5DDlLvxyDKzw QydK+zAsNfp7D84Ycb/jMDxNqGXPdqIzNxkMUMDNQaMcckyLDI1jwbRzrDbQo3Bc NTJCTzfvg5C2bKCaRREmvb+R2y9cj3CObOySjmW8f2epJoArhaKjh1pcmrLmo7vp IkDpOaLJL0/PhLcJAkpTeULDh6ZGX3yybS+EBbwGXn2mRE2mMXxBs7Y0nK32UGtM v+CdrBC78FWoiy1fvWV8 =9264 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==========F8D6BC9452A54C9AC2EB==========-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Sep 11 09:10:47 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 940D1A0025C for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:10:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Axel.Rau@Chaos1.DE) Received: from mailout4.lrau.net (mailout4.lrau.net [IPv6:2a02:d40:2:2::73]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 572681AE4 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:10:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Axel.Rau@Chaos1.DE) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chaos1.de; s=email1; h=Mime-Version:To:Date:Message-Id:Subject: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:From; bh=ob7pffC5Y6Mbw45eciaU1sTSKqux3HzX/fcUOP4/cu4=; b=r4TjsCd6JOrYJ9mbV1RlwS3JM5 bliWZ7MS0Ac9h2/6K7AGzPQGcAykj8XD4fEfES6BZRpmIJNzVkfbu+WjvJb6+qfW/ymSqHlrCH6oC thER77MphXzA8gRDGf/F1HWQ+73RxQgKdL5FMDthGjBAt6MzOiC7THepeBSp0p3MtdZ+t1uWWqAzO 7B/wzvnW3fHgzQ9ZOgs3+QpT7BpQ/7Zva1ulD3edoFkzAmEmFI891uzU9dWTcLF5fvA3dh/1eau76 x56hWInlaSCnjX8Gxwq4vUDNuShvgaZf10xodpIOOijkNmZJQy2zp6EckwVvigk/mFr+lQpR91XPt SGiYUl4g==; Received: from [91.216.35.74] (helo=imap.lrau.net) by mailout4.lrau.net with esmtp (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ZaKLx-000DBt-EB for FreeBSD-Ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:10:41 +0000 Received: from Axel.Rau@Chaos1.DE by imap.lrau.net (Archiveopteryx 3.2.0) with esmtpsa id 1441962640-92403-95602/6/617; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:10:40 +0000 From: Axel Rau Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Looking for a commiter: Bug in Mk/Uses/pgsql.mk ? Message-Id: Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 11:10:39 +0200 To: FreeBSD Mailing List Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1878.6) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:10:47 -0000 Hi all, I have USES=3D pgsql:9.0+ in my port www/calendarserver . This works for me with DEFAULT_VERSIONS=3D pgsql=3D9.4 in /etc/make.conf, but users of the port report various dependency errors like - - - py27-calendarserver-5.1_3 cannot install: the port wants postgresql-clien= t version 9.0 9.1 9.2 9.3 9.4 and you have version 9.4 installed. - - - See https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D201613 Please, can a committer have a look at this? Axel =2D-- PGP-Key:29E99DD6 =E2=98=80 +49 160 9945 7889 =E2=98=80 computing @ = chaos claudius From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Sep 11 09:14:13 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35C17A00512 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:14:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list-freebsd-ports@jyborn.se) Received: from mailgate.leissner.se (mailgate.leissner.se [212.3.1.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1E8E1F5D for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:14:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list-freebsd-ports@jyborn.se) Received: from mailgate.leissner.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailgate.leissner.se (8.15.2/8.15.1) with ESMTP id t8B9C0qD090832 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 11:12:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from list-freebsd-ports@jyborn.se) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by mailgate.leissner.se (8.15.2/8.15.1/Submit) id t8B9C0SA090827 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 11:12:00 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from list-freebsd-ports@jyborn.se) Received: from pol.leissner.se(192.71.29.17), claiming to be "pol-server.leissner.se" via SMTP by mailgate.leissner.se, id smtpdJhNeoi; Fri Sep 11 11:11:55 2015 Received: from localhost (pol-server.leissner.se [local]); by pol-server.leissner.se (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 12d21b6b; for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 11:11:55 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 11:11:55 +0200 From: Peter To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Anyone got RethinkDB working in FreeBSD? Message-ID: <20150911091155.GU13922@pol-server.leissner.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:14:13 -0000 Hello! http://www.rethinkdb.com/ I tried compiling it in FreeBSD 9.3, and managed to get past configure and the start of gmake, but then got a lot of these: ./src/errors.hpp:103:9: error: 'BREAKPOINT' was not declared in this scope BREAKPOINT; \ ^ ./src/errors.hpp:123:13: note: in expansion of macro 'crash_or_trap' crash_or_trap(format_assert_message("Guarantee", cond) msg); \ ^ ./src/rdb_protocol/changefeed.hpp:267:13: note: in expansion of macro 'guarantee' guarantee(k == p.first->second.first); ^ ./src/errors.hpp:103:9: error: 'BREAKPOINT' was not declared in this scope BREAKPOINT; \ ^ ./src/errors.hpp:123:13: note: in expansion of macro 'crash_or_trap' crash_or_trap(format_assert_message("Guarantee", cond) msg); \ ^ ./src/rdb_protocol/changefeed.hpp:269:13: note: in expansion of macro 'guarantee' guarantee(it != index.end()); ^ Any ideas how to fix this? (Or if there is a FreeBSD port of RethinkDB in someones pipe? :) ) Thanks! -- Peter From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Sep 11 14:51:23 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A3E0A0191C for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 14:51:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpg@caomhin.org) Received: from kif.compliantgroup.com (kif.compliantgroup.com [198.245.60.218]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0504E1974 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 14:51:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpg@caomhin.org) Received: from kif.compliantgroup.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kif.compliantgroup.com (Postfix) with SMTP id D9EB2186A692 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:41:08 +0200 (CEST) X-Fuglu-Suspect: cfa3de678fbb420b95b048f1e5a4d9d8 X-Fuglu-Spamstatus: NO Received: from zoidberg.compliantgroup.com (zoidberg.compliantgroup.com [94.23.207.160]) by kif.compliantgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D6ED186A68F for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:41:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zoidberg.compliantgroup.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zoidberg.compliantgroup.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8C7FB14D1E7 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:41:28 +0200 (CEST) X-Fuglu-Suspect: 0b6303089fa44c6e8c8515e64deaaec9 X-Fuglu-Spamstatus: NO Received: from localhost (host86-163-28-172.range86-163.btcentralplus.com [86.163.28.172]) (Authenticated sender: master@caomhin.org) by zoidberg.compliantgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 764DC14D190 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:41:28 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:42:18 +0100 (BST) From: Kevin Golding To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <441028827.153.1441982537926.JavaMail.Kevin@Thoth> In-Reply-To: <425887562.141.1441981537083.JavaMail.Kevin@Thoth> Subject: rc script problem - pidfile not being recognised MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 14:51:23 -0000 I've been trying to work on a new port and it's my first that uses an rc script so I've been expecting a few bumps, but there's one thing I can't seem to fix and it's a blocker. I can't stop the daemon! It dopes create a pidfile so I have the following line in my script: pidfile="/var/run/${name}.pid" Alas... # service fuglu stop fuglu not running? (check /var/run/fuglu.pid). # cat /var/run/fuglu.pid 24013 I don't get it. It is the right process ID: # ps -waux | grep fuglu nobody 24013 0.0 0.5 139532 37372 - I 3:57PM 0:01.03 /usr/local/bin/python2.7 /usr/local/bin/fuglu --pidfile /var/r root 26179 0.0 0.0 18824 1976 0 S+ 4:30PM 0:00.00 grep fuglu I'm at a loss as to what to try, I feel I'm missing something blindingly obvious but it's a mystery to me so if anyone can wave the big red arrow at my mistake I'd be a happy chappy! Full fuglu.in below: #!/bin/sh # $FreeBSD$ # # PROVIDE: fuglu # REQUIRE: LOGIN # KEYWORD: shutdown # # Add these lines to /etc/rc.conf.local or /etc/rc.conf # to enable this service: # # fuglu_enable (bool): Set to NO by default. # Set it to YES to enable fuglu. . /etc/rc.subr name="fuglu" rcvar=fuglu_enable load_rc_config $name : ${fuglu_enable:=no} command=%%PREFIX%%/bin/${name} pidfile="/var/run/${name}.pid" run_rc_command "$1" From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Sep 11 15:12:29 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F04E3A02379 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:12:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpg@caomhin.org) Received: from kif.compliantgroup.com (kif.compliantgroup.com [198.245.60.218]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBC051859 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:12:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpg@caomhin.org) Received: from kif.compliantgroup.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kif.compliantgroup.com (Postfix) with SMTP id ADC0D186A692 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:11:18 +0200 (CEST) X-Fuglu-Suspect: dd24f547126e4b1092107ef4652ab70d X-Fuglu-Spamstatus: NO Received: from zoidberg.compliantgroup.com (zoidberg.compliantgroup.com [94.23.207.160]) by kif.compliantgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D6E9B186A68C for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:11:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zoidberg.compliantgroup.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zoidberg.compliantgroup.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 7352B14D1AF for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:11:38 +0200 (CEST) X-Fuglu-Suspect: 953d85fa7a764cf39736635b7f8e5bad X-Fuglu-Spamstatus: NO Received: from localhost (host86-163-28-172.range86-163.btcentralplus.com [86.163.28.172]) (Authenticated sender: master@caomhin.org) by zoidberg.compliantgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 5CE2F14D1A7; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:11:38 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:12:28 +0100 (BST) From: Kevin Golding To: Michelle Sullivan Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <692733240.176.1441984346441.JavaMail.Kevin@Thoth> In-Reply-To: <55F2EC32.3090602@sorbs.net> Subject: Re: rc script problem - pidfile not being recognised MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:12:30 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michelle Sullivan" > To: "Kevin Golding" > Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org > Sent: Friday, 11 September, 2015 3:58:58 PM > Subject: Re: rc script problem - pidfile not being recognised > > Kevin Golding wrote: > > It dopes create a pidfile so I have the following line in my > > script: > > > > pidfile="/var/run/${name}.pid" > > > > Alas... > > > > # service fuglu stop > > fuglu not running? (check /var/run/fuglu.pid). > > # cat /var/run/fuglu.pid > > 24013 > > > > I don't get it. It is the right process ID: > > > > # ps -waux | grep fuglu > > nobody 24013 0.0 0.5 139532 37372 - I 3:57PM > > 0:01.03 /usr/local/bin/python2.7 /usr/local/bin/fuglu > > --pidfile /var/r > > root 26179 0.0 0.0 18824 1976 0 S+ 4:30PM > > 0:00.00 grep fuglu > > > > I'd take a bet as it's running as a user the process is being called > to > shutdown and there is some permissions issue on the PID file (I see > the > same thing with bucardo when running bucardo as non root) I did wonder about that but the pidfile is world readable: -rw-r--r-- 1 root wheel 6 Sep 11 15:57 /var/run/fuglu.pid And certainly the process's user can read the file # sudo -u nobody cat /var/run/fuglu.pid 24013 Which isn't to say that isn't the problem, just that if it is I think I'm even more confused. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Sep 11 15:18:44 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E946FA0261E for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:18:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (unknown [IPv6:2602:d1:b4d6:e600:4261:86ff:fef6:aa2a]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C43501B9C for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:18:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id t8BFIhcO068738 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 08:18:49 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: In-Reply-To: <441028827.153.1441982537926.JavaMail.Kevin@Thoth> References: <441028827.153.1441982537926.JavaMail.Kevin@Thoth> From: "Chris H" Subject: Re: rc script problem - pidfile not being recognised Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 08:18:49 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: <568af0e68aef53e74bbb736e33531ee5@ultimatedns.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:18:45 -0000 On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:42:18 +0100 (BST) Kevin Golding wrote > I've been trying to work on a new port and it's my first that uses an rc > script so I've been expecting a few bumps, but there's one thing I can't seem > to fix and it's a blocker. I can't stop the daemon! > > It dopes create a pidfile so I have the following line in my script: > > pidfile="/var/run/${name}.pid" > > Alas... > > # service fuglu stop > fuglu not running? (check /var/run/fuglu.pid). > # cat /var/run/fuglu.pid > 24013 > > I don't get it. It is the right process ID: > > # ps -waux | grep fuglu > nobody 24013 0.0 0.5 139532 37372 - I 3:57PM 0:01.03 > /usr/local/bin/python2.7 /usr/local/bin/fuglu --pidfile /var/r root 26179 > 0.0 0.0 18824 1976 0 S+ 4:30PM 0:00.00 grep fuglu > > I'm at a loss as to what to try, I feel I'm missing something blindingly > obvious but it's a mystery to me so if anyone can wave the big red arrow at > my mistake I'd be a happy chappy! > > Full fuglu.in below: > > #!/bin/sh > > # $FreeBSD$ > # > # PROVIDE: fuglu > # REQUIRE: LOGIN > # KEYWORD: shutdown > # > # Add these lines to /etc/rc.conf.local or /etc/rc.conf > # to enable this service: > # > # fuglu_enable (bool): Set to NO by default. > # Set it to YES to enable fuglu. > > . /etc/rc.subr > > name="fuglu" > rcvar=fuglu_enable > > load_rc_config $name > : ${fuglu_enable:=no} > > command=%%PREFIX%%/bin/${name} > pidfile="/var/run/${name}.pid" > > run_rc_command "$1" This question might have been better directed at freebsd-hackers@ but... See if this get's it for you: /etc/rc.subr name=fuglu rcvar=fuglu_enable load_rc_config $name : ${fuglu_enable="NO"} : ${fuglu_pidfile="/var/run/${name}.pid"} command="/usr/local/sbin/${name}" pidfile="${fuglu_pidfile}" run_rc_command $* --Chris > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Sep 11 15:18:56 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ECEDA02638 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:18:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E25501C2B for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:18:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id DF3DAA02637; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:18:55 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DED72A02636 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:18:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x236.google.com (mail-wi0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 826391C2A for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:18:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: by wicgb1 with SMTP id gb1so66832307wic.1 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 08:18:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eGt3RPN4AM5K1wqydiTgqqeNxAP1ox2gg8rA3lmxNPk=; b=EGWO+RkNhX0Jd9xHkVnKPOWZnBDg8lIMDfS8L0uzxZDnCzH8rEywXK/xNTw1rA6Njp caucY0O0HwTIGkFD0zaxTVDpp1ARpgkbsrKVbJGx+5C21h6a3fD9BdsGWlocsO5LPzHP TMJ0KcQVnH44gUkPLGundtcTUE6rJtF5VnHsdrVhNaIXmgmifbXC7Jl3SGNSIuND+dhs 9sXVRerS8fIcKvawFhg2/HpR/smTFJqu4zq7zqXBHBBWYwECI5C3ffJ3DWVbYYKJKIUF mHXUHGPwBguDGSV64lKrY2TAaLObkLFI7/68jrW5gruAX82H6qKRQhgN/gCcR2D6td/W gFMw== X-Received: by 10.194.95.71 with SMTP id di7mr84179820wjb.125.1441984733869; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 08:18:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com ([90.195.198.255]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id uc12sm1153210wib.13.2015.09.11.08.18.52 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 11 Sep 2015 08:18:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:18:50 +0100 From: RW To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc script problem - pidfile not being recognised Message-ID: <20150911161850.402b3d5a@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <441028827.153.1441982537926.JavaMail.Kevin@Thoth> References: <425887562.141.1441981537083.JavaMail.Kevin@Thoth> <441028827.153.1441982537926.JavaMail.Kevin@Thoth> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.12.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:18:56 -0000 On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:42:18 +0100 (BST) Kevin Golding wrote: > I've been trying to work on a new port and it's my first that uses an > rc script so I've been expecting a few bumps, but there's one thing I > can't seem to fix and it's a blocker. I can't stop the daemon! > > It dopes create a pidfile so I have the following line in my script: > > pidfile="/var/run/${name}.pid" > .. > # ps -waux | grep fuglu > nobody 24013 0.0 0.5 139532 37372 - I 3:57PM > 0:01.03 /usr/local/bin/python2.7 /usr/local/bin/fuglu did you set the command_interpreter variable, probably you need command_interpreter=/usr/local/bin/python2.7 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Sep 11 15:21:20 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E2AAA028AF for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:21:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C2DDF1F49 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:21:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ZaQ8c-0008h4-Rc; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:21:18 +0200 Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:21:18 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Peter Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anyone got RethinkDB working in FreeBSD? Message-ID: <20150911152118.GK36682@home.opsec.eu> References: <20150911091155.GU13922@pol-server.leissner.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150911091155.GU13922@pol-server.leissner.se> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:21:20 -0000 Hi! > http://www.rethinkdb.com/ > > I tried compiling it in FreeBSD 9.3, and managed > to get past configure and the start of gmake, but > then got a lot of these: Here's a shar file, which overcomes the BREAKPOINT stuff and quite a bit more, but still needs more patching. So it's still a work in progress, but feel free to try it. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203043 -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Sep 11 15:56:02 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4935AA01A1C for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:56:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpg@caomhin.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E82218B4 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:56:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpg@caomhin.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 2D679A01A1B; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:56:02 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D022A01A1A for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:56:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpg@caomhin.org) Received: from kif.compliantgroup.com (kif.compliantgroup.com [198.245.60.218]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08B1718B3 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:56:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpg@caomhin.org) Received: from kif.compliantgroup.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kif.compliantgroup.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A2A7186A692 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:54:50 +0200 (CEST) X-Fuglu-Suspect: 5dc47afc35b04bbeaa151f24be105c23 X-Fuglu-Spamstatus: NO Received: from zoidberg.compliantgroup.com (zoidberg.compliantgroup.com [94.23.207.160]) by kif.compliantgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5DF46186A68C for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:54:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zoidberg.compliantgroup.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zoidberg.compliantgroup.com (Postfix) with SMTP id CAAB314D1E7 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:55:08 +0200 (CEST) X-Fuglu-Suspect: d7adb2dcce0f42488d65d67d9ba3c608 X-Fuglu-Spamstatus: NO Received: from localhost (host86-163-28-172.range86-163.btcentralplus.com [86.163.28.172]) (Authenticated sender: master@caomhin.org) by zoidberg.compliantgroup.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B32FA14D1AF; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:55:08 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:55:58 +0100 (BST) From: Kevin Golding To: RW Cc: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <853047065.182.1441986957380.JavaMail.Kevin@Thoth> In-Reply-To: <20150911161850.402b3d5a@gumby.homeunix.com> Subject: Re: rc script problem - pidfile not being recognised MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:56:02 -0000 ----- Original Message ----- > From: "RW via freebsd-ports" > Sent: Friday, 11 September, 2015 4:18:50 PM > > On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:42:18 +0100 (BST) > Kevin Golding wrote: > > > I've been trying to work on a new port and it's my first that uses > > an > > rc script so I've been expecting a few bumps, but there's one thing > > I > > can't seem to fix and it's a blocker. I can't stop the daemon! > > > > It dopes create a pidfile so I have the following line in my > > script: > > > > pidfile="/var/run/${name}.pid" > > > .. > > # ps -waux | grep fuglu > > nobody 24013 0.0 0.5 139532 37372 - I 3:57PM > > 0:01.03 /usr/local/bin/python2.7 /usr/local/bin/fuglu > > did you set the command_interpreter variable, probably you need > > command_interpreter=/usr/local/bin/python2.7 And that seems to have fixed it - thank you. I still think there's an error in reading the pidfile since I think this means I'm using the process name rather than the pid but it does the job so I won't worry too much for today. Maybe I'll venture over to freebsd-hackers@ to solve that one when I feel I know my script a little better. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Sep 11 15:59:07 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8690FA01BBF for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:59:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michelle@sorbs.net) Received: from hades.sorbs.net (mail.sorbs.net [67.231.146.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 781971BAC for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:59:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michelle@sorbs.net) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from isux.com (firewall.isux.com [213.165.190.213]) by hades.sorbs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.29.0 64bit (built Jul 9 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0NUI006BJPWQGN00@hades.sorbs.net> for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 08:05:16 -0700 (PDT) Message-id: <55F2EC32.3090602@sorbs.net> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:58:58 +0200 From: Michelle Sullivan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100301 SeaMonkey/1.1.19 To: Kevin Golding Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc script problem - pidfile not being recognised References: <441028827.153.1441982537926.JavaMail.Kevin@Thoth> In-reply-to: <441028827.153.1441982537926.JavaMail.Kevin@Thoth> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 15:59:07 -0000 Kevin Golding wrote: > I've been trying to work on a new port and it's my first that uses an rc script so I've been expecting a few bumps, but there's one thing I can't seem to fix and it's a blocker. I can't stop the daemon! > > It dopes create a pidfile so I have the following line in my script: > > pidfile="/var/run/${name}.pid" > > Alas... > > # service fuglu stop > fuglu not running? (check /var/run/fuglu.pid). > # cat /var/run/fuglu.pid > 24013 > > I don't get it. It is the right process ID: > > # ps -waux | grep fuglu > nobody 24013 0.0 0.5 139532 37372 - I 3:57PM 0:01.03 /usr/local/bin/python2.7 /usr/local/bin/fuglu --pidfile /var/r > root 26179 0.0 0.0 18824 1976 0 S+ 4:30PM 0:00.00 grep fuglu > I'd take a bet as it's running as a user the process is being called to shutdown and there is some permissions issue on the PID file (I see the same thing with bucardo when running bucardo as non root) Regards, Michelle -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/ From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Sep 11 16:19:36 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23C85A02532 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:19:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 033C41788 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:19:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 00038A02530; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:19:36 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3BEAA0252F for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:19:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x230.google.com (mail-wi0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F0D81786 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:19:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: by wicge5 with SMTP id ge5so69417479wic.0 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:19:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=1iUDinIFSiv+nR0tMlAoXsuB/ubeMGjAb3zVWdyzi3o=; b=b2eZFHd/aMvaq/fpo8HIRu+rCF3FUmSK4/4i7VUtJnWZeYNBRpSKTLIHnh5ah+JAMz qhyYBnLlQ1BKTK+x96mxrtznnY+adgTVkWSDAxzIpMlktd48cQ+H2qlTuZSgAAga0fct Pr71AcG3b4TgwLrt5TLtS6pzxzoqJ7/zu0VXWYfXulu/j18UWX8KFzJEvwS1m2M4cNpA D0pUIy4GRqr0Io0uUEcgE5JC8otx6CXe/oqYEgzUUY1E23uWshwNYrDvTt4A6vCHNWtn 2hRnxmuw4PYk4oIl5BDneqxzZk30D1ZoqBGkPItos4gvhIwTb+d2feTn6r2YmGGc6Zg+ UQPA== X-Received: by 10.194.20.161 with SMTP id o1mr87118872wje.32.1441988374080; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:19:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com ([90.195.198.255]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id jw9sm1103421wjb.28.2015.09.11.09.19.32 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:19:33 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:19:30 +0100 From: RW To: Kevin Golding Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc script problem - pidfile not being recognised Message-ID: <20150911171930.59e67cc2@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <853047065.182.1441986957380.JavaMail.Kevin@Thoth> References: <20150911161850.402b3d5a@gumby.homeunix.com> <853047065.182.1441986957380.JavaMail.Kevin@Thoth> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.12.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:19:36 -0000 On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:55:58 +0100 (BST) Kevin Golding wrote: > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "RW via freebsd-ports" > > Sent: Friday, 11 September, 2015 4:18:50 PM > > > > did you set the command_interpreter variable, probably you need > > > > command_interpreter=/usr/local/bin/python2.7 > > And that seems to have fixed it - thank you. > > I still think there's an error in reading the pidfile since I think > this means I'm using the process name rather than the pid but it does > the job so I won't worry too much for today. It needs both. It won't use just the pid file because the pid might have been reassigned to another process if the original daemon died without deleting its pid file. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Sep 11 16:20:06 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 98511A02599 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:20:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imb@protected-networks.net) Received: from mail.auburn.protected-networks.net (mail.auburn.protected-networks.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f07:4e1::3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.auburn.protected-networks.net", Issuer "Protected Networks Root CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67256183D; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:20:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imb@protected-networks.net) Received: from toshi.auburn.protected-networks.net (toshi.auburn.protected-networks.net [192.168.1.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Iain Butler", Issuer "RSA Class 2 Personal CA v2" (verified OK)) (Authenticated sender: imb@mail.auburn.protected-networks.net) by mail.auburn.protected-networks.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7D359B858; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 12:20:04 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: nagios-plugins 2.1.1 segmentation fault To: Mathieu Arnold , Albert Shih , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20150910152646.GA73222@pcjas.obspm.fr> <1F80D3C17D9ABA2903628A86@atuin.in.mat.cc> From: Michael Butler Message-ID: <55F2FF34.1070002@protected-networks.net> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 12:20:04 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1F80D3C17D9ABA2903628A86@atuin.in.mat.cc> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:20:06 -0000 On 09/11/15 03:18, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > > > +--On 10 septembre 2015 17:26:46 +0200 Albert Shih > wrote: > | Hi, > | > | I find a bug about nagios-plugins-2.1.1 I don't known if it's the > | freebsd-ports version or it's about the plugins himself. Anyway if you do > | a > | > | check_http host > | > | where the host didn't answer but can be reach (apache not running) you get > | a Segmentation fault and a core dump. > | > | Easy to try > | > | check_http 127.0.0.1 > | > | Regards. > > Hi, > > I can't reproduce this: > > # /usr/local/libexec/nagios/check_http 127.0.0.1 > HTTP OK: HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently - 491 bytes in 0.001 second > response time |time=0.000816s;;;0.000000 size=491B;;;0 > > Note that using check_http that way is some old legacy way of doing it, you > should run it as: > > # /usr/local/libexec/nagios/check_http -H 127.0.0.1 > HTTP OK: HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently - 491 bytes in 0.000 second > response time |time=0.000367s;;;0.000000 size=491B;;;0 Try it on a machine that *isn't* listening on port 80 .. imb From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Sep 11 16:22:35 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BA11A02799 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:22:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list-freebsd-ports@jyborn.se) Received: from mailgate.leissner.se (mailgate.leissner.se [212.3.1.210]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E726F1BFA for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:22:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from list-freebsd-ports@jyborn.se) Received: from mailgate.leissner.se (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailgate.leissner.se (8.15.2/8.15.1) with ESMTP id t8BGMVxU013162 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 18:22:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from list-freebsd-ports@jyborn.se) Received: (from uucp@localhost) by mailgate.leissner.se (8.15.2/8.15.1/Submit) id t8BGMV26013159 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 18:22:31 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from list-freebsd-ports@jyborn.se) Received: from pol.leissner.se(192.71.29.17), claiming to be "pol-server.leissner.se" via SMTP by mailgate.leissner.se, id smtpdzoO7i0; Fri Sep 11 18:22:25 2015 Received: from localhost (pol-server.leissner.se [local]); by pol-server.leissner.se (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 6104b5d8; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 18:22:25 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 18:22:25 +0200 From: Peter To: Kurt Jaeger Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anyone got RethinkDB working in FreeBSD? Message-ID: <20150911162225.GU13922@pol-server.leissner.se> References: <20150911091155.GU13922@pol-server.leissner.se> <20150911152118.GK36682@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150911152118.GK36682@home.opsec.eu> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:22:35 -0000 On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 05:21:18PM +0200, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > http://www.rethinkdb.com/ > > > > I tried compiling it in FreeBSD 9.3, and managed > > to get past configure and the start of gmake, but > > then got a lot of these: > > Here's a shar file, which overcomes the BREAKPOINT stuff > and quite a bit more, but still needs more patching. So > it's still a work in progress, but feel free to try it. > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203043 > > -- > pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! Thanks! I tried your file, but didn't get very far unfortunately. I had to do these two changes to your Makefile to get past the configure step: Add CXX=c++48 Comment cd ${WRKSRC} && ${PATCH} < ${FILESDIR}/extra-patch-config.mk And I moved extra-patch-config.mk out of the files directory. The addition of CXX is because otherwise configure finds gcc in base, which is too old to be accepted. The removal of extra-patch-config.mk is because that patch failed, probably because I don't have LDFLAGS anywhere in my generated config.mk. I tried adding LDFLAGS, CXXFLAGS and CFLAGS manually to config.mk, but that didn't help. I get this error after a couple of successful compile lines: test -e ./build/external/v8_3.30.33.16/include && touch ./build/external/v8_3.30.33.16/include || true mkdir -p build/release_system/obj/rdb_protocol/ ./build/release_system/dep/rdb_protocol/ c++48 -O2 -pipe -fstack-protector -fno-strict-aliasing -isystem ./build/external/re2_20140111/include -isystem ./build/external/v8_3.30.33.16/include -I./src -pthread "-DPRODUCT_NAME=\"RethinkDB\"" "-D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS" "-D__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS" -Wall -Wextra "-DRAPIDJSON_HAS_STDSTRING" "-DRAPIDJSON_PARSE_DEFAULT_FLAGS=kParseFullPrecisionFlag" -Wnon-virtual-dtor -Wno-deprecated-declarations -std=gnu++0x -Wformat=2 -Wswitch-enum -Wno-array-bounds -O3 -DNDEBUG -fno-strict-aliasing -g -DHAS_TERMCAP -I./build/release_system/proto -DRETHINKDB_VERSION=\"2.1.3\" -DRETHINKDB_CODE_VERSION=\"2.1.3\" -isystem ./build/external/gtest_1.6.0/include -c -o build/release_system/obj/rdb_protocol/erase_range.o src/rdb_protocol/erase_range.cc \ -MP -MQ build/release_system/obj/rdb_protocol/erase_range.o -MD -MF ./build/release_system/dep/rdb_protocol/erase_range.d In file included from ./src/utils.hpp:11:0, from ./src/containers/scoped.hpp:10, from ./src/containers/counted.hpp:10, from ./src/serializer/types.hpp:11, from ./src/buffer_cache/types.hpp:9, from ./src/rdb_protocol/erase_range.hpp:10, from src/rdb_protocol/erase_range.cc:2: /src/debug.hpp: In function 'typename std::enable_if::value>::type debug_print(printf_buffer_t*, T)': ./src/debug.hpp:32:22: error: 'to_string' is not a member of 'std' debug_print(buf, std::to_string(x)); ^ Peter From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Sep 11 16:43:27 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3018DA0112C for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:43:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bdrewery@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 127CA15E0 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:43:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bdrewery@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 116A8A0112A; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:43:27 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBF28A01129 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:43:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bdrewery@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D56FA15DF; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:43:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bdrewery@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.xzibition.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CED331622; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:43:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bdrewery@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.xzibition.com (localhost [172.31.3.2]) by mail.xzibition.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C0D9109CF; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:43:26 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mail.xzibition.com Received: from mail.xzibition.com ([172.31.3.2]) by mail.xzibition.com (mail.xzibition.com [172.31.3.2]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with LMTP id VRaaQqcqkyfC; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:43:24 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: [HEADSUP] portmaster/portupgrade support for new features DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.9.2 mail.xzibition.com 0949C109C9 To: Baptiste Daroussin , ports@FreeBSD.org References: <20150629092226.GL68142@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> From: Bryan Drewery Openpgp: id=F9173CB2C3AAEA7A5C8A1F0935D771BB6E4697CF; url=http://www.shatow.net/bryan/bryan2.asc Organization: FreeBSD Message-ID: <55F304B2.4020209@FreeBSD.org> Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:43:30 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20150629092226.GL68142@ivaldir.etoilebsd.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="iVguM9xPic0qSoJoGNCHRJ1All4BK0Epg" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:43:27 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --iVguM9xPic0qSoJoGNCHRJ1All4BK0Epg Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 6/29/2015 2:22 AM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > hi all, >=20 > A couple of new features are coming to the ports tree. The first of whi= ch has > landed in the ports tree and should not be used before a while, still b= efore we > start using it, it would be a very good idea to bring support for it to= > portmaster/portupgrade. (I have already done the change in poudriere an= d it will > be in te next version.) >=20 > So since recently we can remove the ${PORTSDIR} from all the dependency= lines. > (Please do not use that syntax before all the tools are able to handle = it!) >=20 > Aka BLA_DEPENDS=3D pattern:${PORTSDIR}/category/port can now become > pattern:category/ports >=20 > I haven't checked portmaster/portupgrade code so I have no idea if they= will > support that out of box or if they will need some changes. >=20 > I would really appreciate to see people testing that and provide patche= s if > necessary so that the day we adopt this syntax those tools are already = ready to > use it ootb. >=20 > FYI: https://github.com/freebsd/portmaster and > https://github.com/freebsd/portupgrade >=20 > Later more changes will be necessary to support upcoming VARIANTS (form= erly > known as FLAVOURS) and sub packages. >=20 > This first step would allow you to step into the code of those tools be= fore the > having to deal with more intrusive changes :) >=20 I have not forgotten about this. I plan to look into it in the next few weeks. --=20 Regards, Bryan Drewery --iVguM9xPic0qSoJoGNCHRJ1All4BK0Epg Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJV8wSyAAoJEDXXcbtuRpfPPsEH/jx1/LvdD7s5EAZay2ss62bx 1GrH3nxqECSW1/SwCWt6GS6eUfL/IDjTHEVOI08HJd+59O6HluzcQDaumMQmjSXk RMAFSfY5xUXMOY7QyoN1Qs7mV0dRxDiivV2S1zWS7OcrnF3hh3BpWkEse/M3ceQG W08fogMfPFDE2d1Rg4dnavUExyKAArGj2Cq0sQmTMgJqyeR27HWocSvDgIvZKhQV QPtXZdtJ+S8O11O0IrrGqzxk4Bx+IVt7sVuWWVXAF7t6Q+nPAXXwPktFRt16ZaVL CAhwRpP/HohJLHQJT2qIiVagFMlNGXfTmGUEJ7PEsz7Mm1f76rmHh2/s0q/dqes= =JFeZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --iVguM9xPic0qSoJoGNCHRJ1All4BK0Epg-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Sep 11 16:50:07 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1B10A014C6 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:50:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF9851BE4 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:50:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id DE853A014C3; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:50:07 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE1C8A014C2 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:50:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Received: from mx5.roble.com (mx5.roble.com [206.40.34.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx5.roble.com", Issuer "mx5.roble.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D28861BE3 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:50:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:46:31 -0700 (PDT) From: Roger Marquis To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc script problem - pidfile not being recognised In-Reply-To: <20150911171930.59e67cc2@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <20150911161850.402b3d5a@gumby.homeunix.com> <853047065.182.1441986957380.JavaMail.Kevin@Thoth> <20150911171930.59e67cc2@gumby.homeunix.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; format=flowed; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:50:08 -0000 RW via freebsd-ports wrote: > It needs both. It won't use just the pid file because the pid > might have been reassigned to another process if the original daemon > died without deleting its pid file. Why would this rc script *require* a command_interpreter variable to use the pidfile variable? I'm curious because this violates KIS, the principle of least surprise and few rc scripts seem to have this variable defined. Using command_interpreter is good to be sure, for for the reason listed, but rc scripts should not fail if it is undefined. IMO, Roger Marquis From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Sep 11 17:11:18 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26732A021EE for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:11:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04B371E85 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:11:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 039A8A021ED; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:11:18 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 032EBA021EC for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:11:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x22c.google.com (mail-wi0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9B6E71E82 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:11:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: by wiclk2 with SMTP id lk2so65652353wic.1 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 10:11:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=KXIZqoCrewP/Nw4nPIvLTRXIPEtI/UszA3SbP90SxJo=; b=T2XU7tjuTLbfrn+Xde7JW9zu3drtTI/K/EY+0Psahzs4KAHXypo/sN9kD8WEcH+geL kzgsbgjlfov4Ag0xkgSTn8FnVB43b2f//1VAC8Xb1xskwa3/3bg0rS7A0vEeCHvFm+va F0a8UA/4PN5yafAwS7YX8XdWAWSIrwj5zUk0kreOBlfHIDt21wvqiJtkIsIkzfysVYDv kAkU8e2J5H0GI+Kqp+wDjc5cujTMdqAeTYnlM1qdvWCJcHVTqIk0hoxoQo2QcFKrBwr0 zx4lw0kpAfDNEEEQeSrbJUuDYQtqK5KpUwd82WDmH1GPXT8wsnZdKF82X/S0o9oi4f/3 5mEw== X-Received: by 10.194.87.4 with SMTP id t4mr90064197wjz.84.1441991476063; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 10:11:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com ([90.195.198.255]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i7sm83115wib.15.2015.09.11.10.11.14 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 11 Sep 2015 10:11:15 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 18:11:12 +0100 From: RW To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc script problem - pidfile not being recognised Message-ID: <20150911181112.04651c9e@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <55f30648.b343320a.52a32.0690SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> References: <20150911161850.402b3d5a@gumby.homeunix.com> <853047065.182.1441986957380.JavaMail.Kevin@Thoth> <20150911171930.59e67cc2@gumby.homeunix.com> <55f30648.b343320a.52a32.0690SMTPIN_ADDED_MISSING@mx.google.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.12.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:11:18 -0000 On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 09:46:31 -0700 (PDT) Roger Marquis wrote: > RW via freebsd-ports wrote: > > It needs both. It won't use just the pid file because the pid > > might have been reassigned to another process if the original daemon > > died without deleting its pid file. > > Why would this rc script *require* a command_interpreter variable to > use the pidfile variable? I'm curious because this violates KIS, the > principle of least surprise and few rc scripts seem to have this > variable defined. > > Using command_interpreter is good to be sure, for for the reason > listed, but rc scripts should not fail if it is undefined. IIRC the name is always checked. When an interpreted script is run using a shebang the command in the output of ps doesn't match the command used to start the script, so command_interpreter is needed to get a match. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Sep 11 17:13:04 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01295A022B9 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:13:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B6D8B1076 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:13:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ZaRsn-0008uM-HN; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 19:13:05 +0200 Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 19:13:05 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Peter Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anyone got RethinkDB working in FreeBSD? Message-ID: <20150911171305.GL36682@home.opsec.eu> References: <20150911091155.GU13922@pol-server.leissner.se> <20150911152118.GK36682@home.opsec.eu> <20150911162225.GU13922@pol-server.leissner.se> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150911162225.GU13922@pol-server.leissner.se> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 17:13:04 -0000 Hi! > I tried your file, but didn't get very far unfortunately. > > I had to do these two changes to your Makefile to get past > the configure step: > > Add CXX=c++48 I suggest you go straight to clang, I'm not sure if USES= compiler:c++11-lib would do the trick, but I'll try as soon as I get a building version on 11-CURRENT. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Sep 11 19:27:59 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A381A012A8 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 19:27:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DE0881A08 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 19:27:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ZaTzN-00095c-8r; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 21:28:01 +0200 Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 21:28:01 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Peter , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anyone got RethinkDB working in FreeBSD? Message-ID: <20150911192801.GM36682@home.opsec.eu> References: <20150911091155.GU13922@pol-server.leissner.se> <20150911152118.GK36682@home.opsec.eu> <20150911162225.GU13922@pol-server.leissner.se> <20150911171305.GL36682@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150911171305.GL36682@home.opsec.eu> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 19:27:59 -0000 Hi! Right now, I'm in the part where it tries to link the build/external/v8_3.30.33.16/build/out stuff and fails because the clang loader does not handle lib....a files 8-( -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Sep 11 19:41:07 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07F22A0198A for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 19:41:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Albert.Shih@obspm.fr) Received: from mx-m2.obspm.fr (mx-m2.obspm.fr [145.238.186.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "*.obspm.fr", Issuer "TERENA SSL CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9D13310AC; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 19:41:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Albert.Shih@obspm.fr) Received: from pcjas.obspm.fr (pcjas.obspm.fr [145.238.184.233]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx-m2.obspm.fr (8.14.4/8.14.4/DIO Observatoire de Paris - 15/04/10) with ESMTP id t8BJeu8t017488 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 11 Sep 2015 21:40:57 +0200 Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 21:40:17 +0200 From: Albert Shih To: Michael Butler Cc: Mathieu Arnold , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nagios-plugins 2.1.1 segmentation fault Message-ID: <20150911194017.GA99476@pcjas.obspm.fr> References: <20150910152646.GA73222@pcjas.obspm.fr> <1F80D3C17D9ABA2903628A86@atuin.in.mat.cc> <55F2FF34.1070002@protected-networks.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <55F2FF34.1070002@protected-networks.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.3.9 (mx-m2.obspm.fr [145.238.186.20]); Fri, 11 Sep 2015 21:40:57 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.98.7 at mx-m2.obspm.fr X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 19:41:07 -0000 Le 11/09/2015 à 12:20:04-0400, Michael Butler a écrit > On 09/11/15 03:18, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > > > > > > +--On 10 septembre 2015 17:26:46 +0200 Albert Shih > > wrote: > > | Hi, > > | > > | I find a bug about nagios-plugins-2.1.1 I don't known if it's the > > | freebsd-ports version or it's about the plugins himself. Anyway if you do > > | a > > | > > | check_http host > > | > > | where the host didn't answer but can be reach (apache not running) you get > > | a Segmentation fault and a core dump. > > | > > | Easy to try > > | > > | check_http 127.0.0.1 > > | > > | Regards. > > > > Hi, > > > > I can't reproduce this: > > > > # /usr/local/libexec/nagios/check_http 127.0.0.1 > > HTTP OK: HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently - 491 bytes in 0.001 second > > response time |time=0.000816s;;;0.000000 size=491B;;;0 > > > > Note that using check_http that way is some old legacy way of doing it, you > > should run it as: > > > > # /usr/local/libexec/nagios/check_http -H 127.0.0.1 > > HTTP OK: HTTP/1.1 301 Moved Permanently - 491 bytes in 0.000 second > > response time |time=0.000367s;;;0.000000 size=491B;;;0 > > Try it on a machine that *isn't* listening on port 80 .. I just create a bug report on github https://github.com/nagios-plugins/nagios-plugins/issues/104 Regards. -- Albert SHIH DIO bâtiment 15 Observatoire de Paris 5 Place Jules Janssen 92195 Meudon Cedex France Téléphone : +33 1 45 07 76 26/+33 6 86 69 95 71 xmpp: jas@obspm.fr Heure local/Local time: ven 11 sep 2015 21:38:51 CEST From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Sep 11 23:46:26 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E8F8CA02A35 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 23:46:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michelle@sorbs.net) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D20D1162A for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 23:46:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michelle@sorbs.net) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id CFE70A02A34; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 23:46:26 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF7BBA02A33 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 23:46:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michelle@sorbs.net) Received: from hades.sorbs.net (mail.sorbs.net [67.231.146.200]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF33C1629 for ; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 23:46:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from michelle@sorbs.net) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII Received: from isux.com (firewall.isux.com [213.165.190.213]) by hades.sorbs.net (Oracle Communications Messaging Server 7.0.5.29.0 64bit (built Jul 9 2013)) with ESMTPSA id <0NUJ00A22EBR3N00@hades.sorbs.net> for ports@freebsd.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 16:52:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-id: <55F367CF.2080507@sorbs.net> Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2015 01:46:23 +0200 From: Michelle Sullivan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.8.1.24) Gecko/20100301 SeaMonkey/1.1.19 To: Roger Marquis Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc script problem - pidfile not being recognised References: <20150911161850.402b3d5a@gumby.homeunix.com> <853047065.182.1441986957380.JavaMail.Kevin@Thoth> <20150911171930.59e67cc2@gumby.homeunix.com> <0NUI007RMV24EUD0@hades.sorbs.net> In-reply-to: <0NUI007RMV24EUD0@hades.sorbs.net> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 23:46:27 -0000 Roger Marquis wrote: > RW via freebsd-ports wrote: >> It needs both. It won't use just the pid file because the pid >> might have been reassigned to another process if the original daemon >> died without deleting its pid file. > > Why would this rc script *require* a command_interpreter variable to use > the pidfile variable? I'm curious because this violates KIS, the > principle of least surprise and few rc scripts seem to have this variable > defined. > > Using command_interpreter is good to be sure, for for the reason listed, > but rc scripts should not fail if it is undefined. +1 to that. -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/ From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Sep 12 09:01:30 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EEF3A02821 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2015 09:01:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E64A8109C; Sat, 12 Sep 2015 09:01:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Zagga-000A1s-FD; Sat, 12 Sep 2015 11:01:28 +0200 Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2015 11:01:28 +0200 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Peter , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Anyone got RethinkDB working in FreeBSD? Message-ID: <20150912090128.GN36682@home.opsec.eu> References: <20150911091155.GU13922@pol-server.leissner.se> <20150911152118.GK36682@home.opsec.eu> <20150911162225.GU13922@pol-server.leissner.se> <20150911171305.GL36682@home.opsec.eu> <20150911192801.GM36682@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150911192801.GM36682@home.opsec.eu> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2015 09:01:30 -0000 Hi! > Right now, I'm in the part where it tries to link the > build/external/v8_3.30.33.16/build/out > stuff and fails because the clang loader does not handle > lib....a files 8-( The latest .shar is available at https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=203043 together with a build-log at https://opsec.eu/backup/rethinkdb-build which shows that it fails to link the external v8. If anyone has an idea on how to fix this ? (Bcc: to sunpoet who maintains lang/v8*). -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 5 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Sep 12 09:50:20 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6A0CA02CAF for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2015 09:50:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aarredon@cs.nmsu.edu) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C0EF15B4 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2015 09:50:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aarredon@cs.nmsu.edu) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 995E8A02CAE; Sat, 12 Sep 2015 09:50:20 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F097A02CAD for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2015 09:50:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aarredon@cs.nmsu.edu) Received: from mail.cs.nmsu.edu (athena.cs.nmsu.edu [128.123.64.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 525F915B3 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2015 09:50:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aarredon@cs.nmsu.edu) Received: from intranet.cs.nmsu.edu (intranet.cs.nmsu.edu [128.123.64.22]) by mail.cs.nmsu.edu (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t8C9cRgE002516; Sat, 12 Sep 2015 03:38:27 -0600 X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.8.3 mail.cs.nmsu.edu t8C9cRgE002516 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=simple/simple; d=cs.nmsu.edu; s=dkim; t=1442050707; bh=0G49D03EC7AGX3KoklBPxocHD0o=; h=Message-ID:Date:Subject:From:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=UuNC+xqnY1/cMPn+1EtEN1UAAjNfScDP+jNUJ7O07kgkAWMw4g6c21Fy6qDT9getM cCw++bsT5dxudR9NTJ4+tF3+Doz9vP2RjojauHiAxxaVcqhkY+5fFkvXzyR41Ulr6K JPZtN/ZKS1dTbFFKYuat0uJ6p/7Xixk8dBevmGPw= Received: from 67.41.1.21 (SquirrelMail authenticated user aarredon) by intranet.cs.nmsu.edu with HTTP; Sat, 12 Sep 2015 03:38:27 -0600 Message-ID: Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2015 03:38:27 -0600 Subject: FreeBSD Port: htop-1.0.3 From: "Antonio Arredondo" To: gaod@hychen.org Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.19 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2015 09:50:20 -0000 Dear Maintainer, I just wanted to let you know that the output for htop (after installation) is out of order: Message for htop-1.0.3: *********************************************************** htop(1) requires linprocfs(5) to be mounted. If you don't have it mounted already, please add this line to /etc/fstab and run `mkdir -p /usr/compat/linux/proc; ln -s /usr/compat /compat; mount linproc`: linproc /compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw,late 0 0 *********************************************************** should be Message for htop-1.0.3: *********************************************************** htop(1) requires linprocfs(5) to be mounted. If you don't have it mounted already, please add this line to /etc/fstab linproc /compat/linux/proc linprocfs rw,late 0 0 and run `mkdir -p /usr/compat/linux/proc; ln -s /usr/compat /compat; mount linproc`: *********************************************************** The last line should be before the mkdir commands, to prevent users from incorrectly adding the "mkdir ..." commands to /etc/rc.conf I installed htop using 'pkg install htop-1.0.3'. Output of 'pkg info htop-1.0.3': htop-1.0.3 Name : htop Version : 1.0.3 Installed on : Sat Sep 12 03:11:13 MDT 2015 Origin : sysutils/htop Architecture : freebsd:10:x86:64 Prefix : /usr/local Categories : sysutils Licenses : GPLv2 Maintainer : gaod@hychen.org WWW : http://htop.sourceforge.net/ Comment : Better top(1) - interactive process viewer Options : LSOF : on Annotations : repo_type : binary repository : FreeBSD Flat size : 151KiB Description : htop is an enhanced version of top, the interactive process viewer, which can display the list of processes in a tree form. Comparison between 'htop' and 'top' * In 'htop' you can scroll the list vertically and horizontally to see all processes and full command lines. * In 'top' you are subject to a delay for each unassigned key you press (especially annoying when multi-key escape sequences are triggered by accident). * 'htop' starts faster ('top' seems to collect data for a while before displaying anything). * In 'htop' you don't need to type the process number to kill a process, in 'top' you do. * In 'htop' you don't need to type the process number or the priority value to renice a process, in 'top' you do. * In 'htop' you can kill multiple processes at once. * 'top' is older, hence, more tested. WWW: http://htop.sourceforge.net/ If you have any questions, let me know. --------------------------------- Antonio Arredondo PhD Candidate NMSU Computer Science Department http://www.cs.nmsu.edu/~aarredon/ --------------------------------- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Sep 12 11:28:05 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38ECCA02DCA for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2015 11:28:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1779914CD for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2015 11:28:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 144C1A02DC9; Sat, 12 Sep 2015 11:28:05 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13E8CA02DC8 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2015 11:28:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x230.google.com (mail-wi0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6FFC14CB for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2015 11:28:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwmaillists@googlemail.com) Received: by wiclk2 with SMTP id lk2so83327584wic.1 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2015 04:28:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20120113; h=date:from:to:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8xSAZybEI4xZ59g8JOzsGDUqVEGc951WD8WFSHm5kzA=; b=iqp6xeTu/2dAT1ScuGSQw/uiavJB4y1eZ45CMFGSnVTy7snuLz5AKFzmqmYM2uhH1E 2VleqAjCqQvTa3nT857VeyD99VS7b6newDIivVMhy7A/d1vvscQh2cbkJgZOPDro1qFI r3OwSV/VQjB1B1y7NrWzBRUcj+33h07n2q96zU2fjojXkGLe2b+yzaw1skppxC0AChjl ALM1f4OwBpJjAYECJSr1CsAg36ccothuHZF0vyNaiNnaga67ONwsBwpsiA0Ne7jD/aeT dYkWg/Dcn6TaH2IbFkbs0ZLG5OJSlnrtJfKm8pAHkh8voi951q89LOBPFK+yenHsX6RI czzg== X-Received: by 10.180.104.40 with SMTP id gb8mr5673639wib.17.1442057283107; Sat, 12 Sep 2015 04:28:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com ([90.195.198.255]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id uo6sm5095979wjc.1.2015.09.12.04.28.00 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 12 Sep 2015 04:28:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2015 12:27:59 +0100 From: RW To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc script problem - pidfile not being recognised Message-ID: <20150912122759.412ea139@gumby.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <55F367CF.2080507@sorbs.net> References: <20150911161850.402b3d5a@gumby.homeunix.com> <853047065.182.1441986957380.JavaMail.Kevin@Thoth> <20150911171930.59e67cc2@gumby.homeunix.com> <0NUI007RMV24EUD0@hades.sorbs.net> <55F367CF.2080507@sorbs.net> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.12.0 (GTK+ 2.24.28; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2015 11:28:05 -0000 On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 01:46:23 +0200 Michelle Sullivan wrote: > Roger Marquis wrote: > > RW via freebsd-ports wrote: > >> It needs both. It won't use just the pid file because the pid > >> might have been reassigned to another process if the original > >> daemon died without deleting its pid file. > > > > Why would this rc script *require* a command_interpreter variable > > to use the pidfile variable? I'm curious because this violates > > KIS, the principle of least surprise and few rc scripts seem to > > have this variable defined. > > > > Using command_interpreter is good to be sure, for for the reason > > listed, but rc scripts should not fail if it is undefined. > > +1 to that. You'd rather an rc script fails at run-time and shuts down the wrong daemon than fail when the script is being developed? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Sep 12 11:37:27 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 17316A02273 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2015 11:37:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 014E71986 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2015 11:37:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 00595A02272; Sat, 12 Sep 2015 11:37:27 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F41D5A02271 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2015 11:37:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org (portscout.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E57C41983 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2015 11:37:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t8CBbQci093727 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2015 11:37:26 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id t8CBbQC2093725; Sat, 12 Sep 2015 11:37:26 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201509121137.t8CBbQC2093725@portscout.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2015 11:37:26 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2015 11:37:27 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ x11/xvkbd | 3.6 | 3.7 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Sep 12 15:02:12 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEF5FA02F99 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2015 15:02:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB0231807 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2015 15:02:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id BA19DA02F97; Sat, 12 Sep 2015 15:02:12 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9AB0A02F95 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2015 15:02:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Received: from mx5.roble.com (mx5.roble.com [206.40.34.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx5.roble.com", Issuer "mx5.roble.com" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA9AB1806 for ; Sat, 12 Sep 2015 15:02:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marquis@roble.com) Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2015 08:02:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Roger Marquis To: RW cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc script problem - pidfile not being recognised In-Reply-To: <20150912122759.412ea139@gumby.homeunix.com> References: <20150911161850.402b3d5a@gumby.homeunix.com> <853047065.182.1441986957380.JavaMail.Kevin@Thoth> <20150911171930.59e67cc2@gumby.homeunix.com> <0NUI007RMV24EUD0@hades.sorbs.net> <55F367CF.2080507@sorbs.net> <20150912122759.412ea139@gumby.homeunix.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.11 (BSF 23 2013-08-11) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 12 Sep 2015 15:02:12 -0000 RW via freebsd-ports wrote: > You'd rather an rc script fails at run-time and shuts down the wrong > daemon than fail when the script is being developed? It's not so much where the script fails than that it fails in the first place. Neither a pidfile nor a command_interpreter needs to be required for an rc scripts to work. These are nice features but making them mandatory is at best a sort of premature optimization. The freebsd rc script environment is already far too OS-specific and un-editable, often containing no readable shell code at all. What if your interpreter changes from say python2.7 to python for example? Does that mean you have to reinstall all the associated packages or edit their rc scripts? Neither shouldn you have to parse who knows how many hundred of lines of shell code included by /etc/rc.subr or rewrite an rc script from scratch to make a simple change. We appreciate the features this subsystem provides and the work devs have put into it but not when it's made mandatory. The value of KIS needs to be emphasized here. IMO, Roger Marquis