From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Mon Aug 3 14:39:29 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBA509B2AD9 for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 14:39:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citadel.icyb.net.ua (citadel.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 022041BA6; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 14:39:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citadel.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id RAA23773; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:39:27 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1ZMGti-000BkI-6T; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:39:26 +0300 Message-ID: <55BF7CE4.1040709@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 17:38:28 +0300 From: Andriy Gapon User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Peter Grehan CC: "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: grub-bhyve: editing boot commands References: <55A4D73D.3000308@FreeBSD.org> <55BA6A7F.7080008@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <55BA6A7F.7080008@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 14:39:30 -0000 On 30/07/2015 21:18, Peter Grehan wrote: > Hi Andriy, > >> In the grub-bhyve menu of boot entries I can press 'e' and enter a screen where >> I can modify boot commands for that entry. >> The screen has the following help information at the bootom: >> Minimum Emacs-like screen editing is supported. >> TAB lists completions. >> Press Ctrl-x or F10 to boot, Ctrl-c or F2 for a command-line >> or ESC to discard edits and return to the GRUB menu. >> >> I can make any edits in that screen, but of the mentioned key presses only TAB >> and ESC work as advertised. Ctrl-x, F10, Ctrl-c, F2 are all ignored. >> Is there a way to make them work? > > Fixed upstream > > https://github.com/grehan-freebsd/grub2-bhyve/commit/a2265476e97afb9b67cfca0d1d9e5be8def01f33 Thank you very much! Do you plan to release a new version and update the port soon? :) -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Mon Aug 3 15:13:12 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A89CC9AE5AB for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 15:13:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grehan@freebsd.org) Received: from alto.onthenet.com.au (alto.OntheNet.com.au [203.13.68.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AC28137A for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2015 15:13:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from grehan@freebsd.org) Received: from iredmail.onthenet.com.au (iredmail.onthenet.com.au [203.13.68.150]) by alto.onthenet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFA2B12759 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 01:13:09 +1000 (EST) Received: from localhost (iredmail.onthenet.com.au [127.0.0.1]) by iredmail.onthenet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id E526428119D for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 01:13:09 +1000 (AEST) X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - iredmail.onthenet.com.au Received: from iredmail.onthenet.com.au ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (iredmail.onthenet.com.au [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zSRrYg7ERrmy for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 01:13:09 +1000 (AEST) Received: from Peters-MacBook-Pro.local (c-67-180-92-13.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.180.92.13]) by iredmail.onthenet.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 14EFC280992; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 01:13:06 +1000 (AEST) Subject: Re: grub-bhyve: editing boot commands To: Andriy Gapon References: <55A4D73D.3000308@FreeBSD.org> <55BA6A7F.7080008@freebsd.org> <55BF7CE4.1040709@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" From: Peter Grehan Message-ID: <55BF8500.4010603@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 08:13:04 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.10; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <55BF7CE4.1040709@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 15:13:12 -0000 Hi Andriy, >> Fixed upstream >> >> https://github.com/grehan-freebsd/grub2-bhyve/commit/a2265476e97afb9b67cfca0d1d9e5be8def01f33 > > Thank you very much! > Do you plan to release a new version and update the port soon? :) Yes, I'll get that done shortly. later, Peter. From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Tue Aug 4 01:41:18 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA5F9AF197 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 01:41:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter.thoenen@noaa.gov) Received: from mail-qk0-f177.google.com (mail-qk0-f177.google.com [209.85.220.177]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D97501190 for ; Tue, 4 Aug 2015 01:41:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from peter.thoenen@noaa.gov) Received: by qkfc129 with SMTP id c129so57593839qkf.1 for ; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 18:41:10 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:thread-index:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=YS0ZWLm2jCSDKmenVDO8mot5utNLGCfRsUC09v40hLE=; b=RrS0i84oqIBUHNACnOQ9ClUbkksGIl9QGCQha6EsT4ElEnQ0gZmEdUJT7Xvf/zsZMC dpomiRGHuhyW6FLQEi7Elwur2v8dzWSVbTd2EnjFqbJNKB24DjMAALzQD/ecJcnptxbD cmeKm7Ff9n8xaRDV3uhPzAteYXKFw3e+R3lKDJMlkshhSM0wp70fzuYGC26afhSJqAGs a5q6M3B0or3h6XEDUAl7h7vATc7vXis1EnApCP7YvygyOhO8HQ/z7LNKne1R8cBDmNNm tx67eatWWtitfQavVrehVLagZAgmsuIIW3usXCoxyXr7jBPbuY46xTxxWGBS7ldOKX6E ttbQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQloL9c5Y2V9T8OCq9s6FUbrSOW3D8068WisWD/c4+FlfgvH2C5M/26miSNObOA3sawdtCOC X-Received: by 10.55.22.23 with SMTP id g23mr1833907qkh.3.1438652048136; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 18:34:08 -0700 (PDT) From: Peter Thoenen - NOAA Federal MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-index: AdDOU5RwCVp2RRpfRt+N3+A5TudSvg== Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 15:34:03 -1000 Message-ID: Subject: FreeBSD stable locking W2K12R2 Hyper-V Management Service To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org, bsdic@microsoft.com, freeonhyper-v@lists.launchpad.net Cc: Jeff Poon - NOAA Affiliate Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2015 01:41:18 -0000 Not sure how to troubleshoot this or where to start but my HyperV admins noticed lately that my FreeBSD instance locks the virtual machine management service interface randomly and only possible to restore via a full system (of the HyperV box) reboot. It does not "lock" the VM in that any VM on that HyperV on that instance continues to run no problem it's simply that you can no longer access the management interface or restart the service. FreeBSD: FreeBSD prh-i-sec.prh.noaa.gov 10.2-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 10.2-PRERELEASE #0: Mon Aug 3 10:20:21 HST 2015 pthoenen@prh-i-sec.prh.noaa.gov:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 Microsoft: Windows Server 2012R2 Datacenter Version 6.3 (Build 9600) On Windows side logs pretty vague: [warn] Hyper-V Data Exchange connected to virtual machine 'PRH-I-SEC', but the version does not match the version expected by Hyper-V (Virtual machine ID 58415946-9B71-4C2A-BF9A-ABBC364F30E6). Framework version: Negotiated (3.0) - Expected (3.0); Message version: Negotiated (4.0) - Expected (5.0). This is an unsupported configuration. This means that technical support will not be provided until this problem is resolved. To fix this problem, upgrade the integration services. To upgrade, connect to the virtual machine and select Insert Integration Services Setup Disk from the Action menu. [error] PRH-S-BLADE03 16000 Error Microsoft-Windows-Hyper-V-VMMSMicrosoft-Windows-Hyper-V-VMMS-AdminThe Hyper-V Virtual Machine Management service encountered an unexpected error: Unspecified error (0x80004005). On the flipside I have another FBSD system in the same chassis and doesn't have this problem (when moved to another blade works just fine) but same time lots of errors around the Data Exchange integration service Error Hyper-V-Integration-Data-Exchange 4096 None 'PRH-I-DARK': The Data Exchange integration service is either not enabled, not running or not initialized. (Virtual machine ID 7149C0AC-CECC-48A1-916E-943713B4E92F) Which makes me wonder if somehow the error has to do with the IDE service? On the FBSD side, nothing showing up in system log of import Anyways Google no help and not even sure where to start troubleshooting this one. Thanks in advance, -Peter From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Thu Aug 6 17:41:04 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DCAC9B5124 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 17:41:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carlopmart@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x22f.google.com (mail-wi0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAF211B46 for ; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 17:41:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carlopmart@gmail.com) Received: by wibxm9 with SMTP id xm9so34114123wib.1 for ; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 10:41:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=Qb43J8BB3VhuaASoVTfOAaclrppHtMZ9I50O69b0T3g=; b=GBplP9bZTwpmxxYsxpEVIxjS9lbsL4Lgciru7+rNXk3nD4jj+eapX8oW3DJXnk9nZm 2+/gkvcGpgiRGhNeuV3rxa0YVVAc/VoJcNWn/w5ZBkQtRjzWXjdRuWQGQQwn/3RDI3pG XRWsxsRxzWt+Cstt1OR/7FWjD8igliTEdK40Xpo+StqiS//vODcnpMwbpd4zU1BEEX2T knDqVnZNBXjraWqbh6G03J4PnOz2nxeucgAKz/NyQ1V2hjKgitNpg39o5l5aQfBoLsIx p227gz2sNxKpHjm+YyfU0s4HV37OlpkR4YHr0F2gqoIdSm7wiCb5I7Gr/02xJ/Ms2wVX fX/A== X-Received: by 10.194.203.138 with SMTP id kq10mr5957958wjc.124.1438882862421; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 10:41:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.115.3 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 10:40:22 -0700 (PDT) From: "C. L. Martinez" Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2015 19:40:22 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: FreeBSD 10.2 RC2 under Windows 10 Hyper-V To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2015 17:41:04 -0000 Hi all, Is it needed to install some components from ports in a FreeBSD 10.2 RC2 guest under Windows 10 Hyper-V?? I am doing some tests and at this stage I have problems with my pf rules (they are working without problems in another FreeBSD 10.2 RC2 guest under KVM). Thanks From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Fri Aug 7 00:59:47 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 109B49B4E83 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 00:59:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from outbackdingo@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pd0-x22b.google.com (mail-pd0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D92F0E3B for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 00:59:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from outbackdingo@gmail.com) Received: by pdrh1 with SMTP id h1so20550259pdr.0 for ; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 17:59:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=ZpzXGNKC/23EtkxDGBS71FKWt3HzS8YCf2oqarkiP7Q=; b=NHhYBdM0NTNjZiigshspLcdUUXBhMam4ddYRtZ/+gKuCXuz4yJZB2BXuf6RmEWpmz1 fYxpMYom6pabYs2XWzIlLfmlthn5iqnBuX61j8SidvwomC0CZ/seQvj6r2wJ9QnIkuEF tXwrzpfu1CXqSiI6fmv8ndRSPChySY76//XkBb6eDtMB7nkwRLfk9cuWL6JFUtdNRL+t IzZFaXO0vqNQLtSDJfLf4qv/+uuDQXKNheEmUAUmnq4o9nE8yANg6fQtC8xmOr8eojV9 iN/PidM4DmMekQC03I8/WEfotwQPIUjljYfihPLtskjkuzvsWAmF4MaAgL8c54TpNfR3 vDJQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.70.56.66 with SMTP id y2mr8754394pdp.168.1438909186173; Thu, 06 Aug 2015 17:59:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.70.36.199 with HTTP; Thu, 6 Aug 2015 17:59:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 10:59:46 +1000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10.2 RC2 under Windows 10 Hyper-V From: Outback Dingo To: "C. L. Martinez" Cc: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 00:59:47 -0000 On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 3:40 AM, C. L. Martinez wrote: > Hi all, > > Is it needed to install some components from ports in a FreeBSD 10.2 > RC2 guest under Windows 10 Hyper-V?? > > I am doing some tests and at this stage I have problems with my pf > rules (they are working without problems in another FreeBSD 10.2 RC2 > guest under KVM). > > might want to explain the issue a bit further, like what kind of problem.. im running 10.2 under hyper-v and not seeing any issues > Thanks > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-virtualization > To unsubscribe, send any mail to " > freebsd-virtualization-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Fri Aug 7 07:10:37 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 818129B52AE for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 07:10:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carlopmart@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x22f.google.com (mail-wi0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26418115 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 07:10:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carlopmart@gmail.com) Received: by wibhh20 with SMTP id hh20so53464358wib.0 for ; Fri, 07 Aug 2015 00:10:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=Zvsk0euskcuBZ38Cxb4/TtFzbYmrePtIKNcaT7bJjL0=; b=AHkcHeEzPKf4MtmEHXSg89M3Gqa/nIygKoXaYkJtpIzdQjtXCD6duC4AQCdoR43ukF knKXwlWEjhDAiUqeeB6fu2HvXHU/g6aUESVEnEp8noQNlgVj5O7lOK5cPSzD0bvz7L7w Dq1/EcIrS3SiJ04gkPhsaWkUePk6j5F+J/Rz+xOZ9o1OyMxMRfMMxaL95j+lfeXtzbTc FkeaD+a9xEhIYAV5TUDKrb+SbwEy5tD90RjXMZr8QPtHJTW2XtESSDiIGZUa/AIfnkgi 7bdlB1eTwJy+7ZpAbP+LkmacUfA/1XlhscqH0oHM3GOq+wyhkCQ2iqcAMpcRfLLjdqLS jaJw== X-Received: by 10.194.250.69 with SMTP id za5mr11767321wjc.90.1438931435646; Fri, 07 Aug 2015 00:10:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.115.3 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 00:09:56 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: "C. L. Martinez" Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 09:09:56 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10.2 RC2 under Windows 10 Hyper-V To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 07:10:37 -0000 On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 2:59 AM, Outback Dingo wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 3:40 AM, C. L. Martinez wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> Is it needed to install some components from ports in a FreeBSD 10.2 >> RC2 guest under Windows 10 Hyper-V?? >> >> I am doing some tests and at this stage I have problems with my pf >> rules (they are working without problems in another FreeBSD 10.2 RC2 >> guest under KVM). >> > > might want to explain the issue a bit further, like what kind of problem.. > im running 10.2 under hyper-v and not seeing any issues > Sure, no problems. I am sure that my pf rules are ok, because I use them in several FreeBSD 10.x installs. Testing with a simple rule set like this: scrub log on $ExtIf all reassemble tcp fragment reassemble nat on $ExtIf from $IntIf:network to any -> ($ExtIf) pass all ICMP proto works without problems. But UDP and TCP connections, fails. I can see how traffic flows in this FreeBSD vm acting as a firewall (using tcpdump), but connections aren't returned. I have tried to disable tso, tx and rx checksum, etc without luck. This FreeBSD vm is created as Gen1 hyper-v guest. I don't know if it can Works as Gen2. But configuring another vm inside this Hyper-V using Debian, iptables works without problems for all protocols. Any idea? From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Fri Aug 7 07:37:32 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47C849B5A00 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 07:37:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from weh@microsoft.com) Received: from na01-bl2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bl2on0126.outbound.protection.outlook.com [65.55.169.126]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9D66DF0 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 07:37:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from weh@microsoft.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=selector1; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=/dWK7y23j6XpgpF0gNE/ckHRyUtyP0LsXJbpv/GSf+c=; b=he/uES1C1tY3BDahP6K3E8aDJwZVtDUd1K7jLc+kNxNa3rdIeRxSeHZ6qQQOgC31yXP6fWIR7PJAc8WYwz0RFY+nHwhYIXKi3H0OCb8ZUZp8rdSv/Eg+TJ+plZNY91CGC3iwnDvgYcgRcwdu7+vjgJSgswqyfh4fzWJgt5TBXMs= Received: from BY1PR03MB1434.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.162.127.152) by BY1PR03MB1436.namprd03.prod.outlook.com (10.162.127.154) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.225.19; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 07:21:21 +0000 Received: from BY1PR03MB1434.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.127.152]) by BY1PR03MB1434.namprd03.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.127.152]) with mapi id 15.01.0225.018; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 07:21:21 +0000 From: Wei Hu To: "C. L. Martinez" , "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" Subject: RE: FreeBSD 10.2 RC2 under Windows 10 Hyper-V Thread-Topic: FreeBSD 10.2 RC2 under Windows 10 Hyper-V Thread-Index: AQHQ0G8WC6Z2o5t69U6YdiysJdYTSJ3/t9YAgABnbACAAAG+QA== Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 07:21:20 +0000 Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=weh@microsoft.com; x-originating-ip: [167.220.232.8] x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BY1PR03MB1436; 5:/9slIh4WHuAjYniff4Amk1sz5N0f8WCFH1FFWwPZHZth0hZEa8AE/CzOdjRsZl7zFdPICHw01FVwyvPvaDXoy1ZE7jDxPQWz5jVOvj0HWsbGkBUa63PV3+VPG6HtvrNBdjH8DLQjfy0A44akbKyk1g==; 24:Kg0s/qIEvGXV3bQgCsLxnc5n59ucqS6vZ4MxdEnTrtpsy8o5396w0I8f5cVsTF+e3Y5lT+OfQTOD4pHQdeh38WADgaOzc/wmYPxz7Yy5Q5I=; 20:DLJGtL8daSjSOLns7e0YVzFMbxayZXrsh6lsBlIJyYIIEe+YdqoahLzCO+n/G/dj2vnZ9rfj+FGb0klF9sIDww== x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(42134001)(42139001); SRVR:BY1PR03MB1436; x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401001)(5005006)(3002001); SRVR:BY1PR03MB1436; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BY1PR03MB1436; x-forefront-prvs: 066153096A x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(13464003)(53754006)(24454002)(199003)(164054003)(377454003)(189002)(5003600100002)(81156007)(102836002)(15975445007)(76576001)(4001540100001)(2501003)(54356999)(5001960100002)(101416001)(76176999)(10400500002)(105586002)(5005710100001)(106356001)(64706001)(77096005)(10290500002)(50986999)(2950100001)(5002640100001)(5001860100001)(10090500001)(97736004)(106116001)(5001770100001)(5001830100001)(2900100001)(107886002)(86612001)(2656002)(99286002)(122556002)(189998001)(68736005)(40100003)(74316001)(46102003)(62966003)(92566002)(77156002)(66066001)(19580405001)(19580395003)(86362001)(87936001)(33656002)(575784001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BY1PR03MB1436; H:BY1PR03MB1434.namprd03.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: microsoft.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: microsoft.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 07 Aug 2015 07:21:20.4024 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 72f988bf-86f1-41af-91ab-2d7cd011db47 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BY1PR03MB1436 X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 07:37:32 -0000 What is your Hyper-V version, 2012R2, 2012 or earlier? UDP offloading is no= t working Properly on 2012 and earlier Hyper-V. I committed a patch r286058 to 10.2 r= elease branch on July 30th to disable UDP offloading on these releases. It = might not be in RC2, should be in the upcoming RC3.=20 Also is it working on any other 10.x releases on Hyper-V? Thanks, Wei > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd- > virtualization@freebsd.org] On Behalf Of C. L. Martinez > Sent: Friday, August 7, 2015 3:10 PM > To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10.2 RC2 under Windows 10 Hyper-V >=20 > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 2:59 AM, Outback Dingo > wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 3:40 AM, C. L. Martinez > wrote: > >> > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Is it needed to install some components from ports in a FreeBSD 10.2 > >> RC2 guest under Windows 10 Hyper-V?? > >> > >> I am doing some tests and at this stage I have problems with my pf > >> rules (they are working without problems in another FreeBSD 10.2 RC2 > >> guest under KVM). > >> > > > > might want to explain the issue a bit further, like what kind of proble= m.. > > im running 10.2 under hyper-v and not seeing any issues > > >=20 > Sure, no problems. I am sure that my pf rules are ok, because I use them = in > several FreeBSD 10.x installs. >=20 > Testing with a simple rule set like this: >=20 > scrub log on $ExtIf all reassemble tcp fragment reassemble nat on $ExtIf = from > $IntIf:network to any -> ($ExtIf) pass all >=20 >=20 > ICMP proto works without problems. But UDP and TCP connections, fails. > I can see how traffic flows in this FreeBSD vm acting as a firewall (usin= g > tcpdump), but connections aren't returned. >=20 > I have tried to disable tso, tx and rx checksum, etc without luck. >=20 > This FreeBSD vm is created as Gen1 hyper-v guest. I don't know if it can > Works as Gen2. But configuring another vm inside this Hyper-V using Debia= n, > iptables works without problems for all protocols. >=20 > Any idea? > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org mailing list > https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=3Dhttp%3a%2f%2flists.f= ree > bsd.org%2fmailman%2flistinfo%2ffreebsd- > virtualization&data=3D01%7c01%7cweh%40microsoft.com%7c5348fbbb9f994a7 > 488cb08d29ef74fe6%7c72f988bf86f141af91ab2d7cd011db47%7c1&sdata=3Di0C2 > TGskl4D1Qj62vD%2bWVvOTtszjx7iVJfbGQQWIXEU%3d > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-virtualization- > unsubscribe@freebsd.org" From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Fri Aug 7 08:04:37 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F3659B6428 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 08:04:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carlopmart@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wi0-x22b.google.com (mail-wi0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEB4E1CAB for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 08:04:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carlopmart@gmail.com) Received: by wijp15 with SMTP id p15so50538055wij.0 for ; Fri, 07 Aug 2015 01:04:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=WycN40tIwpPC8VUYQoKU4PrDw0Ip3v5KwHdpylskrUY=; b=CHaCICzaDP080dopr96+nCe8XKqxUq99R+tDWcXxRiu3eX6URxSvSvnnDP+wLN0b/9 VK+M7tiipRv4xtJ2vdGPkx+iSsu5HlW69NrYs6hlXUE047nRurbAtwjBrXVChVhwd1Kv 1SRAUxYvjk84vvUEAB69jEUGh/Wu6jC5YJCufPlG/UFVIWbuy0d4pltyea3cPl+TO1kL LeI8J2/hlRBdAyeDUloeSNtxAG1Ti2IHsm4DpOrWZ+sEiNZ0DM52KmLyMPuYrPKDy4tG 7ZAAJJwQ+BxOSrIN8DgPY55mKDD1ieZgB6u2ADqxdaMfMysvPikNQI1gejR1UNh7sF4L nU0g== X-Received: by 10.194.203.138 with SMTP id kq10mr12944424wjc.124.1438934675400; Fri, 07 Aug 2015 01:04:35 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.194.115.3 with HTTP; Fri, 7 Aug 2015 01:03:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: "C. L. Martinez" Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2015 10:03:55 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10.2 RC2 under Windows 10 Hyper-V To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 08:04:37 -0000 On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 9:21 AM, Wei Hu wrote: > What is your Hyper-V version, 2012R2, 2012 or earlier? UDP offloading is not working > Properly on 2012 and earlier Hyper-V. I committed a patch r286058 to 10.2 release branch on July 30th to disable UDP offloading on these releases. It might not be in RC2, should be in the upcoming RC3. > > Also is it working on any other 10.x releases on Hyper-V? > > Thanks, > Wei > It is a Windows 10 Enterprise host. Some time ago, I was used Windows 2012 R2 host and i need to disable tso and rx and tx checksums ... But this is a Windows 10 host ... From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Sat Aug 8 06:29:41 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0465A9AC6A8; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 06:29:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from milios@ccsys.com) Received: from cargobay.net (cargobay.net [198.178.123.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFB856A0; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 06:29:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from milios@ccsys.com) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (cblmdm72-240-160-19.buckeyecom.net [72.240.160.19]) by cargobay.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8ABD5FEF; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 06:28:41 +0000 (UTC) From: "Chad J. Milios" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Help OpenStack and bsd-cloudinit work right before 10.2-RELEASE images start baking in all those ovens in the wild. Message-Id: <6374BF77-7EED-40A7-A4DB-8E3C193A957B@ccsys.com> Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 02:29:37 -0400 To: freebsd-cloud@freebsd.org, freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2102\)) X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2102) X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2015 06:29:41 -0000 TLDR: Pipe name servers to resolvconf rather than write them to resolv.conf bsd-cloudinit needs to work properly with local resolvers e.g. unbound = and solve other side effects https://github.com/pellaeon/bsd-cloudinit/pull/18 Call for expertise: I need help, I fear this patch is either horribly under-thought because = I don=E2=80=99t know the particular landscape of OpenStack or it=E2=80=99s= perfect and a testament to the beauty of BSD unix. Are there corner = cases I=E2=80=99m not considering? Is the contextual code used in a = chroot somewhere that I=E2=80=99m not using, in an =E2=80=98offline' = mode where we can=E2=80=99t run a pipe to this program instead of simple = write to a file? Why now?: We need this very important fix to make it out soon, as people will be = rolling their new 10.2 images very very soon to be committed to their = deployment image repos in all those pesky little one off dev ops systems = in the wild that seem to set in stone or at least something like north = canada winter pine sap. This bug is particularly hard to update between = major cycles and it makes a sticky messy smudge for adoption on = otherwise smooth solid offerings with FreeBSD cloud platform so = hopefully we can get some discussion and review and consensus on this = pull request here and get the port updated too and everything if = necessary so when people start getting their 10.2-RELEASEs and pulling = the pkgs and ports tree, whatever branch that may be back ported or = whatever, they need to get this important low level thing right about = hooking into their cloud infrastructure from the jump. This fix has worked great for me but my testing and use case is limited = and very center of road. Help this guy out he=E2=80=99s already testing = and needs to hear what you think too. Package builders, image rollers = and big cloud platform engineers or virtual appliance builders all take = note of this bug and make sure your BSDs runs right in the cloud when = you know you want to use a local validating resolver and think you are = doing so securely with local trust and performance Thank you so much everyone for your time and consideration. Chad J. Milios= From owner-freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Sat Aug 8 06:35:48 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5CDA9AC8D9; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 06:35:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from milios@ccsys.com) Received: from cargobay.net (cargobay.net [198.178.123.147]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3099A1B; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 06:35:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from milios@ccsys.com) Received: from [192.168.0.2] (cblmdm72-240-160-19.buckeyecom.net [72.240.160.19]) by cargobay.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A5E3BFF3; Sat, 8 Aug 2015 06:34:50 +0000 (UTC) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2102\)) Subject: Re: Help OpenStack and bsd-cloudinit work right on 8.x - 10.2+ From: "Chad J. Milios" In-Reply-To: <6374BF77-7EED-40A7-A4DB-8E3C193A957B@ccsys.com> Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2015 02:35:45 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <6374BF77-7EED-40A7-A4DB-8E3C193A957B@ccsys.com> To: freebsd-cloud@freebsd.org, freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2102) X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 08 Aug 2015 06:35:49 -0000 > On Aug 8, 2015, at 2:29 AM, Chad J. Milios wrote: >=20 > TLDR: > Pipe name servers to resolvconf rather than write them to resolv.conf > bsd-cloudinit needs to work properly with local resolvers e.g. unbound = and solve other side effects > https://github.com/pellaeon/bsd-cloudinit/pull/18 >=20 > Call for expertise: > I need help, I fear this patch is either horribly under-thought = because I don=E2=80=99t know the particular landscape of OpenStack or = it=E2=80=99s perfect and a testament to the beauty of BSD unix. Are = there corner cases I=E2=80=99m not considering? Is the contextual code = used in a chroot somewhere that I=E2=80=99m not using, in an =E2=80=98offl= ine' mode where we can=E2=80=99t run a pipe to this program instead of = simple write to a file? >=20 > Why now?: > We need this very important fix to make it out soon, as people will be = rolling their new 10.2 images very very soon to be committed to their = deployment image repos in all those pesky little one off dev ops systems = in the wild that seem to set in stone or at least something like north = canada winter pine sap. This bug is particularly hard to update between = major cycles and it makes a sticky messy smudge for adoption on = otherwise smooth solid offerings with FreeBSD cloud platform so = hopefully we can get some discussion and review and consensus on this = pull request here and get the port updated too and everything if = necessary so when people start getting their 10.2-RELEASEs and pulling = the pkgs and ports tree, whatever branch that may be back ported or = whatever, they need to get this important low level thing right about = hooking into their cloud infrastructure from the jump. >=20 > This fix has worked great for me but my testing and use case is = limited and very center of road. Help this guy out he=E2=80=99s already = testing and needs to hear what you think too. Package builders, image = rollers and big cloud platform engineers or virtual appliance builders = all take note of this bug and make sure your BSDs runs right in the = cloud when you know you want to use a local validating resolver and = think you are doing so securely with local trust and performance >=20 > Thank you so much everyone for your time and consideration. >=20 > Chad J. Milios >=20 Sorry to reply again so fast but just remembered very important, chime = in if you=E2=80=99re still running 8.4 and you like to do it on = OpenStack because this patch needs to become more complicated to keep = working on 8.4 and that=E2=80=99s currently beyond me. So if you don=E2=80= =99t want to be forced onto 9.x just yet on OpenStack well then speak = now and we=E2=80=99ll make sure it keeps working or else forever hold = your peace.=