From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Mar 5 04:31:36 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E5D9CF87C0 for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 04:31:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from detox.dharple@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 617881919 for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 04:31:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from detox.dharple@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 60F18CF87BD; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 04:31:36 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60A39CF87BB for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 04:31:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from detox.dharple@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qk0-x22e.google.com (mail-qk0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20A221916 for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 04:31:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from detox.dharple@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qk0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id g129so46986749qkd.1 for ; Sat, 04 Mar 2017 20:31:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=FOsdQILm9ItWQGToRpiIPnEgC4SE99vBNHY7Hu8EHag=; b=PahCsWTtVaZs7OhTCT1ENyyDzMOxnBH269HvnrlManTklgH7OcC+s3D2rsGW+DEs0c 0YIKPFXoVf3FGyffjaDz5lMYBgn5iXV9RHq/reFfP4wHJYVfZ2ITLc8pHv0y3x/P+JgX dD+d0uFUIyB2/ldo82UZrNsR3QlE3qso7cxZn2cM3x5Zxm97/A1Ex3G+0HR1TTJAvgj/ jYuLt4MOM1TsoAyQE6661HwcgPZoyR2YCTTYMuZ6wjuhe6osIyTEuEAmcVcsa36AW3Ek C/XWtP26eErJNVYeDLT8yV9PHTyNisDWffriRQsTbIvjnolcjGHmixIcav0hQxSCfMVT QsnQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=FOsdQILm9ItWQGToRpiIPnEgC4SE99vBNHY7Hu8EHag=; b=kpayTsrdVQYtmtYQU11Xw3eq3JvzbZnKMlynSWbhWI428G+n98ItUF5WtAJYD9Sca3 99eLz9Et8lgXJMzcGbFggh7DRF47GVlSSnacsCqSOOYufxnzEwm/ivH6xAK5h18LEVKl oOjf3Cr/PJ3/Dm6GDF49lXWP1L/D+TBRfTAx31vOamt7QbJ0s0ngRAWqX8aKZhCcZ+YM gIwCydRCYdeP/GZV7xUtnGm8LPBmh5QIEtwRqfiYJ+tTSxFyUpOo6FIIUHuDf5BFJUgR apvacy3F1GoNOCpQcd9q8Y8tO84Lza75GmDfcUjELySt/mX7w1fEiPw94tNNGV0bDqv6 Y3/g== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mQgJe7IGXAus1xHxqbV1DxGYxnSdTxa2sec1PkNbKpHyL+ptuiyJjTA0kmEEXgxR4TfRCGjF4qn/md9w== X-Received: by 10.237.34.76 with SMTP id o12mr11283017qtc.261.1488688295277; Sat, 04 Mar 2017 20:31:35 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Doug Harple Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2017 04:31:24 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: sysutils/detox To: ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2017 04:31:36 -0000 Hello, I'm the developer of detox. I recently released v1.3.0, and you can find it here. https://github.com/dharple/detox Best regards, Doug Harple From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Mar 5 07:08:00 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF7AFCFA0E9 for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 07:08:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF2361F0E for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 07:08:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id DB809CFA0E8; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 07:08:00 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB200CFA0E7 for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 07:08:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4F0D1F0D for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 07:08:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ckQGs-000E06-JR; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 08:07:58 +0100 Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 08:07:58 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Doug Harple Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sysutils/detox Message-ID: <20170305070758.GK13006@home.opsec.eu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2017 07:08:01 -0000 Hi! > I'm the developer of detox. I recently released v1.3.0, and you can find > it here. https://github.com/dharple/detox Update in the portstree done. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 3 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Mar 5 08:29:42 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EC09CF76AC for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 08:29:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20ABA166B for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 08:29:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v258TguR042826 for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 08:29:42 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 193394] x11-wm/ede/: ede-keyboard-conf was compiled without XKB extension. Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2017 08:29:42 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: needs-patch, needs-qa X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: mat@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2017 08:29:42 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D193394 Mathieu Arnold changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org | --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Mar 5 09:10:45 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FB76CF81BA for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 09:10:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 11FC81C39 for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 09:10:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 0E9A1CF81B7; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 09:10:45 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E50FCF81B6 for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 09:10:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (portscout.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01C4B1C37 for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 09:10:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v259AiVt063176 for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 09:10:44 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v259Ailu063168; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 09:10:44 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201703050910.v259Ailu063168@portscout.ysv.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.ysv.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 09:10:44 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2017 09:10:45 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ finance/moneymanagerex | 1.2.7 | v1.3.3 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ japanese/ddskk | 15.1 | 16.2 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Mar 5 09:18:33 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66C90CF84BD for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 09:18:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lacey.leanne@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qk0-x22c.google.com (mail-qk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 255261131 for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 09:18:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lacey.leanne@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id v125so54329508qkh.2 for ; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 01:18:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=PbbDqmHyoPysOxNpWPaO1fAPv2XMLVv9EtyCyYUdBgw=; b=UszhFzfnTx2EBjGX2Vqj9OWM+iNEvq53mFK4fs/Bw/Vs3nus6wYnDL272S31TTJ0Sj cvSo8c+eBcuhJJnzPNoxWXY3AY7veHlVoEPVnSnZKAZIec5aATWKVtOzAtpFuAys7AmQ QUyQlcPcMouhs5y0YJkw+o71FVeSszaLeE4BttVAeWmuo+X2SbR4qux1v9yDpc1r5yvM aIoT2M+OVOX34esrmOQSYLf+TQlZDDqp4Mh0GMl4wtE4DsLwu9eniDr2+Lb7GMfYzF5l Ld3NuEp/qybsfwCRX74bDOVL9b+MyB4ZRfis51dXORDBiFJsBJDWHVYo2JPJQeNz5YRr qtPQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=PbbDqmHyoPysOxNpWPaO1fAPv2XMLVv9EtyCyYUdBgw=; b=T+5R5gAQ6DIbw+Wu/uC4w85bjgpaet/7FAE/flAZ345iqoniIenrSh8Wj4I2ezI/E7 PtZym5o5Z70RD9CTX9MimAkooBHI/wWNWYcTAwVx20SRJU//8R1JzBl+v1WVHeKr1qrG wt7Dzw8XHZKgt8SoxwQbZkh064tq7A8wfUGdJXZB5d8UKkVDCdxIJQZXzrPM3Bg74s9Z fJWsxTSejBO5+a5TjlSUk33KDQyppkreHMuJADZMfRz8sSIR/hrEL5T4Cg+BBRb91gYv rfm2p9PGxd0jr3gVEVqY7oevCr80oU8+Ye1x/5Q7tQ2nlNUitU3drY1yIUyL3ZO2/tsa S3eQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39kJMF9h8M19vnplurgOoPr0/eCp+Ty8mzVFLx+5KamkorUM2cNVsgTJmYK/ccSnA7uaPpkRQfBu4Cwa6w== X-Received: by 10.200.54.247 with SMTP id b52mr10690080qtc.160.1488705512198; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 01:18:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.200.0.1 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 01:18:31 -0800 (PST) From: Lacey Powers Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 01:18:31 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Bug 213486 databases/pg_rman unbreak and update to 1.3.3 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2017 09:18:33 -0000 Hello Everyone, My patch to this port has been largely ignored for the past 4 months. Is there a committer that would take a look at it and see if there are changes that were needed to commit it? I'd appreciate it. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213486 Best, Lacey From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Mar 5 09:42:15 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C860CF9010 for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 09:42:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 667ED1160 for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 09:42:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ckSgB-000EEv-0E; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 10:42:15 +0100 Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 10:42:14 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Lacey Powers Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bug 213486 databases/pg_rman unbreak and update to 1.3.3 Message-ID: <20170305094214.GL13006@home.opsec.eu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2017 09:42:15 -0000 Hi! > My patch to this port has been largely ignored for the past 4 months. Yes, the ENOTIME bug has bitten again 8-} > Is > there a committer that would take a look at it and see if there are changes > that were needed to commit it? I'd appreciate it. > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213486 testbuild@work. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 3 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Mar 5 09:53:02 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 842B6CF9310 for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 09:53:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4ACE716C7 for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 09:53:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ckSqb-000EGA-V8; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 10:53:01 +0100 Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 10:53:01 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Lacey Powers , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bug 213486 databases/pg_rman unbreak and update to 1.3.3 Message-ID: <20170305095301.GM13006@home.opsec.eu> References: <20170305094214.GL13006@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170305094214.GL13006@home.opsec.eu> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2017 09:53:02 -0000 Hi! > > Is > > there a committer that would take a look at it and see if there are changes > > that were needed to commit it? I'd appreciate it. > > > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213486 > > testbuild@work. Two build problems: init.c:87:51: error: too many arguments to function call, expected 2, have 3 controlFile = get_controlfile(pgdata, "pg_rman", &crc_ok); ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^~~~~~~ /usr/local/include/postgresql/server/common/controldata_utils.h:15:1: note: 'get_controlfile' declared here extern ControlFileData *get_controlfile(char *DataDir, const char *progname); ^ 1 error generated. backup.c:872:51: error: too many arguments to function call, expected 2, have 3 controlFile = get_controlfile(pgdata, "pg_rman", &crc_ok); ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^~~~~~~ /usr/local/include/postgresql/server/common/controldata_utils.h:15:1: note: 'get_controlfile' declared here extern ControlFileData *get_controlfile(char *DataDir, const char *progname); ^ gmake[1]: *** [: init.o] Error 1 -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 3 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Mar 5 10:11:47 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4942CF9946 for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 10:11:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6DD041076 for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 10:11:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ckT8l-000EIa-5V; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 11:11:47 +0100 Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 11:11:47 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Lacey Powers , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Bug 213486 databases/pg_rman unbreak and update to 1.3.3 Message-ID: <20170305101147.GN13006@home.opsec.eu> References: <20170305094214.GL13006@home.opsec.eu> <20170305095301.GM13006@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170305095301.GM13006@home.opsec.eu> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2017 10:11:47 -0000 Hi! > Two build problems: I submitted a patch, which builds with recent postgres, but fails with 9.3. See the PR for more details. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 3 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Mar 5 11:04:26 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EF46CFAD62 for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 11:04:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from otacilio.neto@bsd.com.br) Received: from mail-qk0-x22c.google.com (mail-qk0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14BC5114F for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 11:04:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from otacilio.neto@bsd.com.br) Received: by mail-qk0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id n127so235548680qkf.0 for ; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 03:04:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsd.com.br; s=capeta; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=v/PA7WxhQ8MbHxlYHxhntPHv0P0LFuCukSVw7tKOzHY=; b=MmuKRnT8OJ7D9nd4hxKH7ZjCkdEdkp3BBkd6jnyTWoAkyXoEFvGyqUKoBVz/y4rl82 b3ihblEKxO5/TMq3LZI9aroeb3kTzXg0RsQ35Z8JlE2ixZGY3oLDLR9siTClHLLQcAcF P2uUqws9ouuyAOQgHtZG7/avi4aHzSVz+C5Uo= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=v/PA7WxhQ8MbHxlYHxhntPHv0P0LFuCukSVw7tKOzHY=; b=DbsMXyjSzV+5SiIDGtpODHWSdmowRyIiG8JPY8Aw1/DurfgU0UBTGpdNjLDLtcSLZG 5tacmQ9yKE8W6h9fHKOvJZCC/TXANMSldEI6ThpQbUZkOvfOukViQn798eVbWRGC7F0N mwuxm4ZkQ6a45m7W6V/XIGaVymUo4LWxFwiaHlp0NwgyZ96AQvrhqBdwaTSu++pDBUQ+ OOaIYD8SFJq4PucWY8/iQjITYYm0awbRQXXUuOLmI0WJXnSdO8ta+QjY0MzBy56rWFwy 9LPu68ABCAxXukcb2B6oSz+XSpRQBb1VYpY3g6/m51T3fSjO9j+d8kIhrYwtl0UADfgq RqoQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39kX5IREceyUksoU+lsxIor7XGIjBKoc/27yhzhi7vkj29iFrp3OLHLPrK8xxO6wDA== X-Received: by 10.55.158.86 with SMTP id h83mr10666879qke.15.1488711864898; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 03:04:24 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.11] ([186.236.217.98]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id t43sm11269257qtc.64.2017.03.05.03.04.23 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 05 Mar 2017 03:04:24 -0800 (PST) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: =?UTF-8?B?T3RhY8OtbGlv?= Subject: /usr/local/lib/gcc49/libgfortran.so: undefined reference to `fpgetsticky' on ARM Message-ID: Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 08:03:56 -0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2017 11:04:26 -0000 Dears I'm trying compile math/openblas on a Beaglebone black. The compilations stops at this point with this error message: root@beaglebone:/usr/ports/math/openblas/work/OpenBLAS-0.2.19/lapack-netlib/INSTALL # gfortran49 -Wall -fPIC -marm -mfpu=vfp -mfloat-abi=hard -march=armv6 -O2 -lm -gfortran49 -Wall -fPIC -marm -mfpu=vfp -mfloat-abi=hard -march=armv6 -O2 -lm -Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc49 -L/usr/local/lib/gcc49 -B/usr/local/bin -fstack-protector -Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc49 -L/usr/local/lib/gcc49 -lgfortran -o tprotector -o testlsame lsame.o lsametst.o /usr/local/lib/gcc49/libgfortran.so: undefined reference to `fpgetsticky' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status This other port biology/psi88 has a identically problem: ===> Building for psi88-1.0_9 (cd src/ && make all) gfortran49 -O -Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc49 psi1.f -o PSI1 -Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc49 -L/usr/local/lib/gcc49 -B/usr/local/bin /usr/local/lib/gcc49/libgfortran.so: undefined reference to `fpgetsticky' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status *** [PSI1] Error code 1 I found a source of fpgetsticky here: root@beaglebone:/usr/ports/biology/psi88 # ls /usr/src/lib/libc/arm/gen/fpgetsticky_vfp.c /usr/src/lib/libc/arm/gen/fpgetsticky_vfp.c So, can someone give me a hint about how to fix it? Thanks a lot! []'s -Otacilio From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Mar 5 13:17:36 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9659ECF902E for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 13:17:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tingox@gmail.com) Received: from mail-it0-x22e.google.com (mail-it0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6400B15CF for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 13:17:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tingox@gmail.com) Received: by mail-it0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id m27so36425378iti.1 for ; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 05:17:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+dP2xsvW5/s9g1TNYyXdUBQZyvhCLgRcbYGQaVPiwew=; b=X7CjKtGEnRYSPmF00IFoxvEl4WdR+MmJUxhxBNylKX7DnfR69D78GnrQsXxaP2PIKM SH1KWwVFkWcbsV4mthZmKO3wSmuWG4+GNftzKrwhCh8FdwrMeeNM306XarlyxMZtMdJi VCCb35EMmz29+tZB91WJquN9e2kDdkzJ3L4YA9lx2A9T1khhVIlOX+jb2+uDKcWXZTwt gp1ZzDtGGxwVzAKoqTq2AY60nv5+IYgdpYY0uNW6PHvQhBm9qg4ovjTgyBwswObtHMNX G2nHPYgkir0x/nUEBIETx/NBkmh0QCXDp/HxmW/2vZxXJ/oVm+4k0XDz00ND9pJMpv1q Iz9A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=+dP2xsvW5/s9g1TNYyXdUBQZyvhCLgRcbYGQaVPiwew=; b=bOrrUf7n5jocVYSJf8Jmg+dEguoi5SuNfurQT+B5Ml4WuMLWCowqW8OwI+lxxTsFEp K/wOv8gEs90FHIZoQsfC91S8IOWiADeHDo4HpkX15b72zWHKeI+2OQg4KAkOPSftrIQ8 IqSL4p9c9nCYciTCJr59gTKB1jC6p9LGAkpIrt6txKXdsmEdmf6xl311Avt9Iuszzf2a E2jT4NOsLQTOBWGua4d5l99cfoStA55X1KnWbMwWeqTB6/+5W9ztRn88BJIsI34Swomo A18fzzeaLZbtOtxz0WvzXuBxgsNhrq/a+OXyGZ/8vdyfqwkPqzw3MBcFZIKtDR7mv86S JZDQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mdXntQicZvHyk2znr09HA2nkbp8ywuTP0ojaLPElewEbQTb8LKz9PYfRkscwXOEZJNFdXT95nayGaJ8g== X-Received: by 10.36.93.77 with SMTP id w74mr10349804ita.80.1488719855647; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 05:17:35 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.107.40.8 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 05:17:35 -0800 (PST) From: Torfinn Ingolfsen Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 14:17:35 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: libdsk - new homepage and newer releases To: pixel@hugbox.org Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2017 13:17:36 -0000 FWIW, libdsk has / will move to http://www.seasip.info/Unix/LibDsk/ Also there is a newer version available, 1.4.2 HTH -- Regards, Torfinn Ingolfsen From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Mar 5 14:05:41 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AF9FCF9F1F for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 14:05:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: from mailrelay116.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay116.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.20.143]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "relay.skynet.be", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EBC45125F for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 14:05:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2B4BwAzGrxY/0nD8VFeGwEBAQMBAQEJA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBg1FREIEKg1+KDXOQUSkBlQ2CDSqFeAKCZUAYAQIBAQEBAQEBayiFFgEFIzM?= =?us-ascii?q?jEAsYAgIFIQICDyoeBhOKAAqxHIImingBAQEBAQUBAQEBAQEdBYELijKDF4E9g?= =?us-ascii?q?waCXwWcLIZ2izB2kDaTOx84gQM3LAiCUoJ3gUs/NYpMAQEB?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2B4BwAzGrxY/0nD8VFeGwEBAQMBAQEJAQEBg1FREIEKg1+?= =?us-ascii?q?KDXOQUSkBlQ2CDSqFeAKCZUAYAQIBAQEBAQEBayiFFgEFIzMjEAsYAgIFIQICD?= =?us-ascii?q?yoeBhOKAAqxHIImingBAQEBAQUBAQEBAQEdBYELijKDF4E9gwaCXwWcLIZ2izB?= =?us-ascii?q?2kDaTOx84gQM3LAiCUoJ3gUs/NYpMAQEB?= Received: from 73.195-241-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([81.241.195.73]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 05 Mar 2017 15:04:26 +0100 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v25E4OmD002605; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 15:04:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 15:04:23 +0100 From: Tijl Coosemans To: =?UTF-8?B?T3RhY8OtbGlv?= Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /usr/local/lib/gcc49/libgfortran.so: undefined reference to `fpgetsticky' on ARM Message-ID: <20170305150423.30f9ec45@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2017 14:05:41 -0000 On Sun, 5 Mar 2017 08:03:56 -0300 Otac=C3=ADlio = wrote: > I'm trying compile math/openblas on a Beaglebone black. The compilations= =20 > stops at this point with this error message: >=20 > root@beaglebone:/usr/ports/math/openblas/work/OpenBLAS-0.2.19/lapack-netl= ib/INSTALL=20 > # gfortran49 -Wall -fPIC -marm -mfpu=3Dvfp -mfloat-abi=3Dhard -march=3Dar= mv6=20 > -O2 -lm -gfortran49 -Wall -fPIC -marm -mfpu=3Dvfp -mfloat-abi=3Dhard=20 > -march=3Darmv6 -O2 -lm -Wl,-rpath=3D/usr/local/lib/gcc49=20 > -L/usr/local/lib/gcc49 -B/usr/local/bin -fstack-protector=20 > -Wl,-rpath=3D/usr/local/lib/gcc49 -L/usr/local/lib/gcc49 -lgfortran -o=20 > tprotector -o testlsame lsame.o lsametst.o > /usr/local/lib/gcc49/libgfortran.so: undefined reference to `fpgetsticky' > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status >=20 > This other port biology/psi88 has a identically problem: >=20 > =3D=3D=3D> Building for psi88-1.0_9 =20 > (cd src/ && make all) > gfortran49 -O -Wl,-rpath=3D/usr/local/lib/gcc49 psi1.f -o PSI1=20 > -Wl,-rpath=3D/usr/local/lib/gcc49 -L/usr/local/lib/gcc49 -B/usr/local/bin > /usr/local/lib/gcc49/libgfortran.so: undefined reference to `fpgetsticky' > collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status > *** [PSI1] Error code 1 >=20 > I found a source of fpgetsticky here: >=20 > root@beaglebone:/usr/ports/biology/psi88 # ls=20 > /usr/src/lib/libc/arm/gen/fpgetsticky_vfp.c > /usr/src/lib/libc/arm/gen/fpgetsticky_vfp.c >=20 >=20 > So, can someone give me a hint about how to fix it? This is a problem with libc that has been fixed in FreeBSD head but has not been merged to stable yet: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=3Drevision&revision=3D313873 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Mar 5 14:08:39 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92357CFA07B for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 14:08:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from otacilio.neto@bsd.com.br) Received: from mail-qk0-x231.google.com (mail-qk0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4C7C41361 for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 14:08:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from otacilio.neto@bsd.com.br) Received: by mail-qk0-x231.google.com with SMTP id p64so571652qke.1 for ; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 06:08:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsd.com.br; s=capeta; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BhJPZkPpLVwD6KWb9RA/yOkv5XtFU2qYG6+jV7e+Abc=; b=P17zNNh0bkXEXi5d2L/DHC44Azss84LBu/uhjwgG6jTL4gbJ5fzqrQwFFKYvkxD/tj iYVFMLoQgZUvJWjj2Wj+LlNqCQcRcDAb3edTYKoSBSRCEIFU4ECWR3mqdE8pLzMjw6iB av5JRnga0duVjAcFmvG2ejG9ZhqXi1v7zBN9I= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=BhJPZkPpLVwD6KWb9RA/yOkv5XtFU2qYG6+jV7e+Abc=; b=USEOuyJA4OjcSIzLUIUS/bFI8QaofXKhP9UiIlh6/YbxaBLXZ8qjpG4TbAC1ssTIWO LW8tHNBuByPRgXjZhmr0hihtY69VPn9OiCVBoJ1Z6Nvp/tCvNbUVnNXpguY79JdroQvD xqrBYVfzWi0P5X2x5NltlzF2rgjW4BVWfg927H4/U94pcsu6t/jdFpI+6VU2dW95J+wU +2cI5nh76Bmk70ceUPlFihGsIXY8+jz5EmhKtL4nOR1TwfsuvcmJt9SuuYm1f/XRETOE /bTbhNvbMnAvyWyju73w/qicyeGFuKR2gAu08rsZMrw770/sXMWFlRcChZXTW5881zqh Er/g== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nZAiiLe1BOMMlnb8mTgkAiXBAPZZ69rOC2fn4LFF0C3Ph2/6wfV0G2loiAjOw6hA== X-Received: by 10.55.98.203 with SMTP id w194mr10790995qkb.322.1488722918035; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 06:08:38 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.11] ([186.236.217.98]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id m62sm11511998qkf.31.2017.03.05.06.08.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 05 Mar 2017 06:08:37 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: /usr/local/lib/gcc49/libgfortran.so: undefined reference to `fpgetsticky' on ARM To: Tijl Coosemans References: <20170305150423.30f9ec45@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: =?UTF-8?B?T3RhY8OtbGlv?= Message-ID: Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 11:08:09 -0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170305150423.30f9ec45@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2017 14:08:39 -0000 Em 05/03/2017 11:04, Tijl Coosemans escreveu: > On Sun, 5 Mar 2017 08:03:56 -0300 Otacílio wrote: >> I'm trying compile math/openblas on a Beaglebone black. The compilations >> stops at this point with this error message: >> >> root@beaglebone:/usr/ports/math/openblas/work/OpenBLAS-0.2.19/lapack-netlib/INSTALL >> # gfortran49 -Wall -fPIC -marm -mfpu=vfp -mfloat-abi=hard -march=armv6 >> -O2 -lm -gfortran49 -Wall -fPIC -marm -mfpu=vfp -mfloat-abi=hard >> -march=armv6 -O2 -lm -Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc49 >> -L/usr/local/lib/gcc49 -B/usr/local/bin -fstack-protector >> -Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc49 -L/usr/local/lib/gcc49 -lgfortran -o >> tprotector -o testlsame lsame.o lsametst.o >> /usr/local/lib/gcc49/libgfortran.so: undefined reference to `fpgetsticky' >> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status >> >> This other port biology/psi88 has a identically problem: >> >> ===> Building for psi88-1.0_9 >> (cd src/ && make all) >> gfortran49 -O -Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc49 psi1.f -o PSI1 >> -Wl,-rpath=/usr/local/lib/gcc49 -L/usr/local/lib/gcc49 -B/usr/local/bin >> /usr/local/lib/gcc49/libgfortran.so: undefined reference to `fpgetsticky' >> collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status >> *** [PSI1] Error code 1 >> >> I found a source of fpgetsticky here: >> >> root@beaglebone:/usr/ports/biology/psi88 # ls >> /usr/src/lib/libc/arm/gen/fpgetsticky_vfp.c >> /usr/src/lib/libc/arm/gen/fpgetsticky_vfp.c >> >> >> So, can someone give me a hint about how to fix it? > This is a problem with libc that has been fixed in FreeBSD head but has > not been merged to stable yet: > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=313873 > I'm using HEAD but a revision a bit older (r312852). But, in any case, thank you very much by point the solution to problem! []'s -Otacilio From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Mar 5 16:23:12 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 151C7CFAA85 for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 16:23:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@komquats.com) Received: from smtp-out-so.shaw.ca (smtp-out-so.shaw.ca [64.59.136.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "Client", Issuer "CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E148D1B0F for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 16:23:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from cy.schubert@komquats.com) Received: from spqr.komquats.com ([96.50.22.10]) by shaw.ca with SMTP id kYw3cHpzasa1kkYw4coEHr; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 09:23:05 -0700 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=W+NIbVek c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=jvE2nwUzI0ECrNeyr98KWA==:117 a=jvE2nwUzI0ECrNeyr98KWA==:17 a=kj9zAlcOel0A:10 a=6Iz7jQTuP9IA:10 a=YxBL1-UpAAAA:8 a=6I5d2MoRAAAA:8 a=a5eWuQMbaNYP4iyycDAA:9 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=Ia-lj3WSrqcvXOmTRaiG:22 a=IjZwj45LgO3ly-622nXo:22 Received: from slippy.cwsent.com (slippy [10.1.1.91]) by spqr.komquats.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4151E133 for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 08:23:03 -0800 (PST) Received: from slippy (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by slippy.cwsent.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v257gTNr046207 for ; Sat, 4 Mar 2017 23:42:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com) Message-Id: <201703050742.v257gTNr046207@slippy.cwsent.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.8.0 04/21/2012 with nmh-1.6 Reply-to: Cy Schubert From: Cy Schubert X-os: FreeBSD X-Sender: cy@cwsent.com X-URL: http://www.cschubert.com/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Strange Poudriere Error: clean_pool ??? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2017 23:42:29 -0800 X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4wfKNjeVPGcaWnNjLxZpYyCVd90EF2xnCETU+NrMnbNVd0TGbHs483TgAsN0RlaMeRdkaTqz76+TeAbGn8UWWsobY/akGxeuABk84fRk4kU2cWJIILAasG AHbJTr1iunZAOkFS9NksWfNLLEe35fCRnDX7KIxwat03jPqZPT9AyYS+HhVtRP04r1l0bjHt32R58w== X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2017 16:23:12 -0000 /bin/mkdir -p '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/x11/libXrender/work/stage/usr/local/includ e/X 11/extensions' install -m 0644 ../include/X11/extensions/Xrender.h '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/x11/li bXrender/work/stage/usr/local/include/X11/extensions' /bin/mkdir -p '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/x11/libXrender/work/stage/usr/local/share /doc /libXrender' install -m 0644 doc/libXrender.txt '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/x11/libXrender/work /sta ge/usr/local/share/doc/libXrender' /bin/mkdir -p '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/x11/libXrender/work/stage/usr/local/libda ta/p kgconfig' install -m 0644 xrender.pc '/wrkdirs/usr/ports/x11/libXrender/work/stage/u sr/l ocal/libdata/pkgconfig' ====> Compressing man pages (compress-man) =========================================================================== =================================================== ===> Building package for libXrender-0.9.10 =========================================================================== ====>> Cleaning up wrkdir ===> Cleaning for libXrender-0.9.10 Build crashed: clean_pool build of x11/libXrender ended at Sat Mar 4 22:36:43 PST 2017 build time: 00:02:29 !!! build failure encountered !!! Except for the clean_pool error it appears to have built ok. /var/log/messages is clean. zpool status reports no errors. uname reports: reeBSD bob 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #2 r314638M: Fri Mar 3 16:43:43 PST 2017 root@cwsys:/export/obj/opt/src/svn-current/sys/BREAK amd64 Poudriere was building i386 packages in an i386 poudriere jail. -- Cheers, Cy Schubert FreeBSD UNIX: Web: http://www.FreeBSD.org The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Mar 5 17:05:01 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C55ACFA812 for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 17:05:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from detox.dharple@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CD2F1591 for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 17:05:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from detox.dharple@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 496B4CFA811; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 17:05:01 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4762DCFA810 for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 17:05:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from detox.dharple@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qk0-x234.google.com (mail-qk0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB8E2158F for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 17:05:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from detox.dharple@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qk0-x234.google.com with SMTP id 1so122433380qkl.3 for ; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 09:05:00 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=kO2LhFUC8yCJ4m7Gsxsd9cNNZ2Sgd0wkUpTuTXE9yak=; b=aaYXpPa27xFNghbM06rdgm1mGVcSd8oNZqrmotvvYtAF6LVAuuMtMVVyXGCcmknRQp z0oA2vKIG4I4ioQ3x+ftCQoFXudH4sw3u2hZWV16awJjkeQabFVhglOrpuN3mi/rQsi0 jFU/2ORoQwEwP5DAbgdqSRLhm3SoENd97Da1rXLllfRVBdWKie4rziySxPEh41NBNI7X qxkikBt0Rk0G39IcaztRNXNDVKZXIROAqDX/OIvtFnSbdOk/p5JINNzt2k0KYG7W2Whb jHb0hhJYPmU24CJvqOidgOZHwtTZOS/SpNkJNIM2WN+AZcbLArG2dsxfLE9fJMxR9M3a rGIg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=kO2LhFUC8yCJ4m7Gsxsd9cNNZ2Sgd0wkUpTuTXE9yak=; b=RtTPs4prDUCfnTTAbUz6498WoH0bXCMwk5/1m7ZLLEMIDxiQ9hdFqzNIi1nl/Qhr9Q x5rVY5Y61uChdw9HUUo0FkMqMgrqkO11yNO995F+VROXoUP+5RpNxubezb4yNlUARjGv BTh+mRdXJcGNA9sMMBaA+XtDb+jbeqQXuLu8iuowHW6N41Jf3OacFQUzeaF18oPIRfia YqVpsdqIsYNkFjUqD2d9y3k7WXvfpLt5DDmFXMyhuTz2fvDYe4Sv2ngcM+14Y5Rr8hWQ qt3MHbDwS07mScBfNzWMLwZTdacIsssX24draXKS4szh8IwFK6shjhPeasGj9IPxfIKo xzSw== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mbMG3n6n8t98xqta7oggHOcRV21ehyBu99Cq2+1AsbAV3OLf7O20mDB8j9zBnP5jzs1fxxF2OCHOw7Bg== X-Received: by 10.200.34.38 with SMTP id o35mr12294455qto.226.1488733499926; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 09:04:59 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20170305070758.GK13006@home.opsec.eu> In-Reply-To: <20170305070758.GK13006@home.opsec.eu> From: Doug Harple Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2017 17:04:49 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: sysutils/detox To: Kurt Jaeger Cc: ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2017 17:05:01 -0000 Thank you! Best, Doug On Sun, Mar 5, 2017 at 2:07 AM Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > > > I'm the developer of detox. I recently released v1.3.0, and you can find > > it here. https://github.com/dharple/detox > > Update in the portstree done. > > -- > pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 3 years to > go ! > From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Mar 5 19:35:08 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F65CFACFB for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 19:35:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from otacilio.neto@bsd.com.br) Received: from mail-qk0-x22b.google.com (mail-qk0-x22b.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0299D1982 for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 19:35:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from otacilio.neto@bsd.com.br) Received: by mail-qk0-x22b.google.com with SMTP id v125so64448102qkh.2 for ; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 11:35:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsd.com.br; s=capeta; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version; bh=ub6U++rzzK4+4KBhuWOzBASp3j67lkPuYQ3obt+XhAw=; b=PTwVYvgQ/LHuI0uruYaCdrOrqX2vT71ZTXIgr8reNoX9ST9lm0OwXvhz008ooQ5u7Q npaFJZV+xtkwsPzMq8GGbxDluQgFxp6LQ80sg7KOhSbL3YAT6GTKC34GllgvJseDxb4H 2tGlpQklN1loAcwbMCMGMfm+orL8V3b9/evRM= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:to:from:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version; bh=ub6U++rzzK4+4KBhuWOzBASp3j67lkPuYQ3obt+XhAw=; b=BmAABl3mOMN1aO+JwRRzQmr/23Z7G031ioWhcfeGWCfxFiknDV/ZN8X8IXfj0fcklm 57WY3aWMFTqymeGh3Gw/10x6Kz1C0uqX9KYheXYhYZ5Qf2o1mlLHfDgtmr+GFq9ur2So BB4u3Vm0Q+xJ/jaQ+vwTd07F5idYDYtOymbErzz/zIzvPkEa+X7519So5WPm9bSsC2Ed ccZob3a+uXg82aOC9syMGiAsfi1OtmW3FzmDJgtSIrYUrwJnErEdmH/VmMtnJpMElT+S /g59QxLZPKFpXa5+CpDSjBBWWcxkWdHZlch/IqqWCw0dzqFhKAVPbihIKWytyumdbvdS aHPg== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nhmFBp9nD+0RG7zERhnbmoS43KAjoIRng+pNr4QsGy9/qidnOYV211n/8CHuNEJw== X-Received: by 10.200.50.231 with SMTP id a36mr13722584qtb.156.1488742507021; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 11:35:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.0.11] ([186.236.217.98]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id r188sm11936874qkb.50.2017.03.05.11.35.05 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 05 Mar 2017 11:35:06 -0800 (PST) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: =?UTF-8?B?T3RhY8OtbGlv?= Subject: /usr/local/lib/libpkg.so: Undefined symbol "dirname@FBSD_1.0" on raspberrypi 3 Message-ID: Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 16:34:37 -0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2017 19:35:08 -0000 Dears I made a build of FreeBSD 12 r312852M for my RPI3. I'm using poudriere to build packages. Unfortunately when I try to install a package I'm getting this error: root@rpi3:/usr/home/ota # pkg install netperf Updating squitch repository catalogue... squitch repository is up-to-date. All repositories are up-to-date. Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting) The following 2 package(s) will be affected (of 0 checked): New packages to be INSTALLED: netperf: 2.7.0 indexinfo: 0.2.6 Number of packages to be installed: 2 Proceed with this action? [y/N]: y [1/2] Installing indexinfo-0.2.6... [1/2] Extracting indexinfo-0.2.6: 0%/usr/local/lib/libpkg.so: Undefined symbol "dirname@FBSD_1.0" Someone knows how to fix it? This is my image: FreeBSD rpi3 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #3 r312852M: Wed Feb 22 22:40:47 BRT 2017 ota@squitch:/root/crochet/work/obj/arm64.aarch64/usr/src/sys/GENERIC-NODEBUG arm64 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sun Mar 5 19:38:48 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E30ACFADC3 for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 19:38:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A0D91ABC; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 19:38:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1235) id B1E1CF1B; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 19:38:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 20:38:47 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Otac=EDlio?= Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: /usr/local/lib/libpkg.so: Undefined symbol "dirname@FBSD_1.0" on raspberrypi 3 Message-ID: <20170305193847.5mx3kz2biyd564yb@ivaldir.net> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5kqfovf7fya7x2b2" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170225 (1.8.0) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2017 19:38:48 -0000 --5kqfovf7fya7x2b2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 04:34:37PM -0300, Otac=EDlio wrote: > Dears >=20 > I made a build of FreeBSD 12 r312852M for my RPI3. I'm using poudriere to > build packages. Unfortunately when I try to install a package I'm getting > this error: >=20 That is because the revision of FreeBSD 12 you are building for and you are running are not in sync. dirname has changed. Best regards, Bapt --5kqfovf7fya7x2b2 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEgOTj3suS2urGXVU3Y4mL3PG3PloFAli8aUcACgkQY4mL3PG3 Plo04g/+MF7TV2D2iUlrp8hbFRa/EB945Tz9YNwGduh/TszJyPxJHspnay/1YpoN 5GPCGUZ/GOIsupIcTe2haHpM7AKMOUvm2OWrOFFJpp3fqIt4/8xfCvYzUOEaU2Bp pU6QlVX6+IugUmDkZQy8yzxRZ061pj9M9brukd9nyZohFGbA8J8TMXhffWAQgMcv TiVlTxlMXe0rnXp9bemFKBW0MDjpYFi2f6wqg/6NNNPrpDcKsD0aLFCDWs/XpPq6 NZxpV2iTjXYKx3u6A3ncBLsoGLb/t5NvfiVw443R91KheRUL1AhOIu6lmF0Y3r/o xpw/3RFew7LhB8SjS+iYZCbWNjtdQLeFWzzSV5VsrLFuJI8ehJvG0r9SgSqR/sQN 8lLj+K2h2BsfZ5nMVIq39BOJif/bs9/6QqTTzb/WDs0F4TE4Bhc2pT4UE9R+7dJb KfmZ7SDyx/kkAH8YRWdqaQaOh11P/s58untgACfZCzLnnC1h8qBPENpPWvLYFk+F ltc6PgXhkajLqVhmaF50zAi8d0KduqUlx7psTHVAbBPleuctfYM4Y0XxbKlD41jn Oml9ssPp+VerD5VdXffL9oKo6cnWsvrOVBFJ0owho1w2sJoOaLvol7Lbo6Tall8B Fe6JmaJlNhNuv4+SJC8KhOQQO7VJJbN1P2rRKi95HqzPYGqZZOY= =Hcgv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5kqfovf7fya7x2b2-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 6 00:06:25 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2949ECFA825 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 00:06:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00B801FBD for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 00:06:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D34120966 for ; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 19:06:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from web4 ([10.202.2.214]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 05 Mar 2017 19:06:23 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zyxst.net; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= mesmtp; bh=fKRXHPj/n8pXGZJh9MCsWa1+RAI=; b=LrvHFfkVS4kbB8CDQMjdd 8w3Oz1VSm+dQbDI3xklNe+04u69eViRIFTEDwVFZsO59ZdRW94QkPFaMT74KOjdz Aim/481EZ0R3FuYByUbx3Phk7Mph0rUHg8guQMReEi0qqn83qrcLzuGBRQMvuPwB t2qPFG6ZTaDjd1gPnI8SHM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=fKRXHPj/n8pXGZJh9MCsWa1+R AI=; b=sANZ5FP6HttUj4yBRFwQ4u7nzrHPAGPbJYGEyiQL/rKjFDzuwvgkRXIGs g32NZ5AgyoVs2d1My05OaUwjTZgKDBzjccclAMetSwohJuSkpAUaYJ8tFNk0gnB7 tcFhZ89D0UfKFqRk4a9oxVcSGgZxBUrvIHfxTx7g8sF33Kkun4= X-ME-Sender: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id F3827BAB57; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 19:06:22 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1488758782.108559.901300512.27398E46@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: John To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-1f3b8e78 Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 00:06:22 +0000 Subject: archivers/libarchive fails to build X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 00:06:25 -0000 Hello ports@ archivers/libarchive fails to build on 11.1-RELEASE-p8 and ports tree is 435506 ===> Building for libarchive-3.2.2,1 /usr/bin/make all-am /bin/sh ./libtool --tag=CC --mode=link cc -O2 -pipe -I/usr/local/include -DLIBICONV_PLUG -fstack-protector -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wformat -Wformat-security -static -L/usr/local/lib -fstack-protector -o bsdtar tar/bsdtar-bsdtar.o tar/bsdtar-cmdline.o tar/bsdtar-creation_set.o tar/bsdtar-read.o tar/bsdtar-subst.o tar/bsdtar-util.o tar/bsdtar-write.o libarchive.la libarchive_fe.la -lcrypto -lcrypto -lexpat -llzo2 -llz4 -lbz2 -lz libtool: link: cc -O2 -pipe -I/usr/local/include -DLIBICONV_PLUG -fstack-protector -fno-strict-aliasing -Wall -Wformat -Wformat-security -fstack-protector -o bsdtar tar/bsdtar-bsdtar.o tar/bsdtar-cmdline.o tar/bsdtar-creation_set.o tar/bsdtar-read.o tar/bsdtar-subst.o tar/bsdtar-util.o tar/bsdtar-write.o -L/usr/local/lib ./.libs/libarchive.a ./.libs/libarchive_fe.a -lcrypto -lexpat -llzo2 -llz4 -lbz2 -lz ./.libs/libarchive.a(archive_write_add_filter_xz.o): In function `archive_compressor_xz_open': libarchive/archive_write_add_filter_xz.c:(.text+0x400): undefined reference to `lzma_lzma_preset' libarchive/archive_write_add_filter_xz.c:(.text+0x492): undefined reference to `lzma_stream_encoder' libarchive/archive_write_add_filter_xz.c:(.text+0x4a3): undefined reference to `lzma_alone_encoder' libarchive/archive_write_add_filter_xz.c:(.text+0x65a): undefined reference to `lzma_raw_encoder' ./.libs/libarchive.a(archive_write_add_filter_xz.o): In function `archive_compressor_xz_close': libarchive/archive_write_add_filter_xz.c:(.text+0x7f6): undefined reference to `lzma_end' ./.libs/libarchive.a(archive_write_add_filter_xz.o): In function `archive_compressor_xz_write': libarchive/archive_write_add_filter_xz.c:(.text+0x963): undefined reference to `lzma_crc32' ./.libs/libarchive.a(archive_write_add_filter_xz.o): In function `drive_compressor': libarchive/archive_write_add_filter_xz.c:(.text+0xa18): undefined reference to `lzma_code' libarchive/archive_write_add_filter_xz.c:(.text+0xa44): undefined reference to `lzma_memusage' ./.libs/libarchive.a(archive_write_set_format_7zip.o): In function `compression_init_encoder_lzma': libarchive/archive_write_set_format_7zip.c:(.text+0x1db3): undefined reference to `lzma_lzma_preset' libarchive/archive_write_set_format_7zip.c:(.text+0x1e1d): undefined reference to `lzma_properties_size' libarchive/archive_write_set_format_7zip.c:(.text+0x1e81): undefined reference to `lzma_properties_encode' libarchive/archive_write_set_format_7zip.c:(.text+0x1ee1): undefined reference to `lzma_raw_encoder' ./.libs/libarchive.a(archive_write_set_format_7zip.o): In function `compression_code_lzma': libarchive/archive_write_set_format_7zip.c:(.text+0x1fd1): undefined reference to `lzma_code' libarchive/archive_write_set_format_7zip.c:(.text+0x2013): undefined reference to `lzma_memusage' ./.libs/libarchive.a(archive_write_set_format_7zip.o): In function `compression_end_lzma': libarchive/archive_write_set_format_7zip.c:(.text+0x2072): undefined reference to `lzma_end' ./.libs/libarchive.a(archive_read_support_format_7zip.o): In function `archive_read_format_7zip_cleanup': libarchive/archive_read_support_format_7zip.c:(.text+0x2145): undefined reference to `lzma_end' ./.libs/libarchive.a(archive_read_support_format_7zip.o): In function `extract_pack_stream': libarchive/archive_read_support_format_7zip.c:(.text+0x34eb): undefined reference to `lzma_code' libarchive/archive_read_support_format_7zip.c:(.text+0x3503): undefined reference to `lzma_end' ./.libs/libarchive.a(archive_read_support_format_7zip.o): In function `init_decompression': libarchive/archive_read_support_format_7zip.c:(.text+0x5d0e): undefined reference to `lzma_end' libarchive/archive_read_support_format_7zip.c:(.text+0x612c): undefined reference to `lzma_properties_decode' libarchive/archive_read_support_format_7zip.c:(.text+0x6162): undefined reference to `lzma_raw_decoder' cc: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation) *** Error code 1 Stop. make[3]: stopped in /usr/ports/archivers/libarchive/work/libarchive-3.2.2 *** Error code 1 Stop. make[2]: stopped in /usr/ports/archivers/libarchive/work/libarchive-3.2.2 *** Error code 1 Stop. make[1]: stopped in /usr/ports/archivers/libarchive *** Error code 1 Stop. make: stopped in /usr/ports/archivers/libarchive thanks, -- J. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 6 00:12:36 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10C08CFA9FA for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 00:12:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from tatiana.utanet.at (tatiana.utanet.at [IPv6:2001:938:1337:25::25:46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 990D01381 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 00:12:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=utanet.at; s=rev1; h=Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:Subject:References:To; bh=nthYGZAegEaxRx+5FyRe/+DmaBiP3TzsZG4qP2/5tCU=; b=u2KE/spY+h8DqT7oCDhvHCf/41ieNv5H8qUDTFpG/HOV4sj14I3/YEeOyY2HkhMRhuhSX+X8wVIBFtIXaMKuvYgpABcy/2SraF7ongndN5suOC+MTOENa5R0A5Zjfx1i9ZRV/c1eud5moavm20NINNdHXqg8sK+VEcJYjh3Nzl0=; Received: from plenty.xoc.tele2net.at ([213.90.36.8]) by tatiana.utanet.at with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ckgGO-0001Oj-SE for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 01:12:32 +0100 Received: from 91-115-90-37.adsl.highway.telekom.at ([91.115.90.37] helo=[10.0.0.93]) by plenty.xoc.tele2net.at with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ckgGO-000839-Py for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 01:12:32 +0100 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <1488758782.108559.901300512.27398E46@webmail.messagingengine.com> Subject: Re: archivers/libarchive fails to build From: Walter Schwarzenfeld Message-ID: Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 01:12:28 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1488758782.108559.901300512.27398E46@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-TELE2-Authenticated-As: cf62768e218b4d81d95cc5390f1bd9dfc8b05683 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 00:12:36 -0000 The old problem Either you deinstall lzmalib or add to the Makefile .if ${OSVERSION} < 1000000 CFLAGS+= "-I${LOCALBASE}/include" CPPFLAGS+= "-I${LOCALBASE}/include" LDFLAGS+= "-L${LOCALBASE}/lib" .endif https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209437 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 6 00:29:54 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED607CFAD5D for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 00:29:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ot0-x231.google.com (mail-ot0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AC11519E6 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 00:29:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ot0-x231.google.com with SMTP id o24so38292055otb.1 for ; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 16:29:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=8yDr/5gH3Fyrkr4Yb+FnuKygJgVUtaHxCv0l96L4cy4=; b=fXO8bbhwBVlOIvXQEe9UEL2rcdpg7T/Bw3TqVrRgbU4U2Pnfe+Fj/LWSIs3iO8gnkB HKBJKQTCNwgmfu1pR7CXQqgwgeKm3ti/v570q/js+S6S7Np1gZVtmC9C48Cjjo3BcWMY Vx0CoF1dkJsBXW5wxrZkvEw2AbpOBApAlUliy9lEvs9ey/UPkyI4n/xPLSOZxIpEnPF7 EGLLeJJcl/WK3Svp1r+u006jOt0ybZVOWdwID6ARwHINLjorzgXwTJd3FZkQHXJPvNZi oMCtzvbVqMTWWnr5AOjSiX8kr5gyumDx8v4pgY16AEgV2RUC9WNHXrnkc6Yy1MMVUcGt THbg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=8yDr/5gH3Fyrkr4Yb+FnuKygJgVUtaHxCv0l96L4cy4=; b=pyhKFntYdQh3YCC3Km6xfkBRkghld1cKI7mpp86z9VZfmjywp4m58eEqiS6Mzr3TUC RnjRuEqwNpPXycoxDfLGQCKHodQqfMP8CJI5Ar9oJJsQxqzi0Jscpoi2yDFaiPmKGwUK onLpSwMSwlyLaLsfVVUtFDTW6qrTUjJHB24K8UbjlsWe69LeM6ZBJfy1dmzfH22mClvW XGJWx31LyuKxgPlya26Ai/FbCHoJzK9S3aGvZpMlCm0gFrZvaqDsJwDv8MCnweXqxSHt 5NYIe+utqBnyEZnG7/ks9YwRyr45S30iKLHAhV1TtLho3qv+mTqPOtnf5M+4GY0hq29k Kbrg== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39mjUYK5AGX0IEW6mMypsUHbzGZpQFvSzVB8S5KHSJMD695FIfXDOlThbDIrXa5oXWQ7tUCNX+FurL8O2Q== X-Received: by 10.157.13.230 with SMTP id 93mr7620805ots.13.1488760193695; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 16:29:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.74.32.79 with HTTP; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 16:29:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <99eb9add-a30b-0445-2f64-8b801d9072db@menhennitt.com.au> References: <99eb9add-a30b-0445-2f64-8b801d9072db@menhennitt.com.au> From: Kevin Oberman Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 16:29:53 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: iNqA9pibpJSGZ6xDCIvQKeREfc4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: linker errors for OpenGL functions To: Graham Menhennitt Cc: FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 00:29:55 -0000 On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Graham Menhennitt wrote: > G'day all, > > I've screwed up something on my system. When I try to build the > x11/kde4-workspace port, I get a pile of linker errors. I'm guessing that I > just need to reinstall some other OpenGL port, but I can't find out which > one. Any clues, please? > > Thanks, > > Graham > > > /usr/local/lib/qt4/libQtOpenGL.so.4: undefined reference to `glBegin' > /usr/local/lib/qt4/libQtOpenGL.so.4: undefined reference to `glPopMatrix' > /usr/local/lib/qt4/libQtOpenGL.so.4: undefined reference to > `glLoadMatrixd' > /usr/local/lib/qt4/libQtOpenGL.so.4: undefined reference to > `glXCreateContext' > /usr/local/lib/qt4/libQtOpenGL.so.4: undefined reference to > `glTexCoordPointer' > /usr/local/lib/qt4/libQtOpenGL.so.4: undefined reference to > `glDeleteTextures' > /usr/local/lib/qt4/libQtOpenGL.so.4: undefined reference to `glGetError' > /usr/local/lib/qt4/libQtOpenGL.so.4: undefined reference to `glTexImage2D' > /usr/local/lib/qt4/libQtOpenGL.so.4: undefined reference to `glTexGenfv' > /usr/local/lib/qt4/libQtOpenGL.so.4: undefined reference to > `glCopyTexImage2D' > /usr/local/lib/qt4/libQtOpenGL.so.4: undefined reference to `glColor4f' > /usr/local/lib/qt4/libQtOpenGL.so.4: undefined reference to `glBlendFunc' > /usr/local/lib/qt4/libQtOpenGL.so.4: undefined reference to `glDrawArrays' > /usr/local/lib/qt4/libQtOpenGL.so.4: undefined reference to > `glXDestroyContext' > /usr/local/lib/qt4/libQtOpenGL.so.4: undefined reference to > `glXQueryExtension' > /usr/local/lib/qt4/libQtOpenGL.so.4: undefined reference to > `glLoadMatrixf' > /usr/local/lib/qt4/libQtOpenGL.so.4: undefined reference to `glIndexi' > /usr/local/lib/qt4/libQtOpenGL.so.4: undefined reference to > `glBindTexture' > /usr/local/lib/qt4/libQtOpenGL.so.4: undefined reference to `glCullFace' > /usr/local/lib/qt4/libQtOpenGL.so.4: undefined reference to > `glPixelTransferi' > /usr/local/lib/qt4/libQtOpenGL.so.4: undefined reference to > `glXGetClientString' > c++: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see > invocation) > gmake[4]: *** [ksmserver/screenlocker/greeter/CMakeFiles/kscreenlocker_greet.dir/build.make:283: > ksmserver/screenlocker/greeter/kscreenlocker_greet] Error 1 > gmake[4]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports_build/usr/data/Fre > eBSD/ports/x11/kde4-workspace/work/.build' > gmake[3]: *** [CMakeFiles/Makefile2:8345: ksmserver/screenlocker/greeter > /CMakeFiles/kscreenlocker_greet.dir/all] Error 2 > gmake[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... > Do you have any older versions of llvm installed? OpenGL has issues if anything older that llvm38 (maybe llvm39) is installed. "pkg delete -f llvm3?" for each version prior to 3.9 installed. It is quite unlikely that you will find any dependencies on the old versions. You can use "pkg info -d llvm3?" to confirm. It is possible that some port or another might need a re-install, but I have yet to see a report of this. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 6 00:33:15 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89A0ECFAF4D for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 00:33:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from tatiana.utanet.at (tatiana.utanet.at [IPv6:2001:938:1337:25::25:46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B1031D72 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 00:33:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=utanet.at; s=rev1; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:Subject:References:To; bh=A56svvS0pAGipzSfEmuqDDNh17VXPujPizlmw4Ds40U=; b=pbw6l+wDUJ9KWoZzNeOrBCyT5MWHv0OLkz+L/Nj6HFDFr8Mt/kyAx4Tz6LpALVAW9ikFrgt9EVRZcQUdJtMWNbUSi18mInIltRblrhkBxrKN9FaJ+cF+b/rBaSaIApcENLgaUzCOaQMEqOGRZfyR3M6rdDC+ZFsyIVzfY3GhUx0=; Received: from paris.xoc.tele2net.at ([213.90.36.7]) by tatiana.utanet.at with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ckgaP-0005pz-0y for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 01:33:13 +0100 Received: from 91-115-90-37.adsl.highway.telekom.at ([91.115.90.37] helo=[10.0.0.93]) by paris.xoc.tele2net.at with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ckgaO-00080J-VQ for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 01:33:13 +0100 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: Subject: Re: archivers/libarchive fails to build From: Walter Schwarzenfeld Message-ID: <7d9e8932-a20d-7f44-9076-b214052ce564@utanet.at> Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 01:33:10 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TELE2-Authenticated-As: cf62768e218b4d81d95cc5390f1bd9dfc8b05683 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 00:33:15 -0000 Sorry was not exacht you have to wrap CFLAGS+= "-I${LOCALBASE}/include" CPPFLAGS+= "-I${LOCALBASE}/include" LDFLAGS+= "-L${LOCALBASE}/lib" in the condition or you delete these three lines from the makefile. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 6 00:36:33 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C266ACF7452 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 00:36:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9669711F9 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 00:36:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tech-lists@zyxst.net) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F8E1205BA; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 19:36:32 -0500 (EST) Received: from web4 ([10.202.2.214]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 05 Mar 2017 19:36:32 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=zyxst.net; h=cc :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=xtisJYQhekAPsMJTJu3sZvvbQT E=; b=T8+IdqOmvFMxWm1siFQEnnzYxmmY5pbEUSSrdl3z1PXbwHTKvduZsLRYS5 qdzLC8fbCxgFF0BkZIF22BZ1XoRnRPNcdzbDSoJyMa2qsu7DRo7mKeOVjSZtYFOs Psv5XFuNqsTsu8lzck1HpBRHIxbLLJ8tYt/051DCTzgnxGSQ8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=xt isJYQhekAPsMJTJu3sZvvbQTE=; b=UhdQvgxatE9T3C3vUN73UNEXecePOQcqND DDHLSKYWw0hm1sMtBWGkFt4UoWQ8+MCuIZqdRba2JCljGuq80C243dxMXd1LqLK9 igogs4CGzYC90E/ETInZ/UgSeSMYKrGWQvT0IEjJZV/8yw82YPl7S2AQWAl9ADIZ mGkshkQHY= X-ME-Sender: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id 0DD21BAB59; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 19:36:32 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1488760591.113814.901321736.78067F18@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: John To: Walter Schwarzenfeld Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-1f3b8e78 Subject: Re: archivers/libarchive fails to build In-Reply-To: Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 00:36:31 +0000 References: <1488758782.108559.901300512.27398E46@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 00:36:33 -0000 Hi, On Mon, 6 Mar 2017, at 00:12, Walter Schwarzenfeld wrote: > The old problem > Either you deinstall lzmalib > or > add to the Makefile > > .if ${OSVERSION} < 1000000 > CFLAGS+= "-I${LOCALBASE}/include" > CPPFLAGS+= "-I${LOCALBASE}/include" > LDFLAGS+= "-L${LOCALBASE}/lib" > .endif > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=209437 Many thanks, that fixed it. Surprised it's still not fixed 10 months after the bug was reported, though. I changed the makefile as lzmalib is required on this machine. -- J. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 6 00:39:47 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92B07CF765F for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 00:39:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from tatiana.utanet.at (tatiana.utanet.at [IPv6:2001:938:1337:25::25:46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 528541327 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 00:39:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=utanet.at; s=rev1; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:Subject:References:To; bh=Io5uLlO35kcWF+lovj5dU3/YBpeup7gsdhE4t8KY0PY=; b=ms53/yoyT5k1STBOl9fcPvBkzNLWu259HPPaa7bM9rVBfj1Bh+5blelTJwPJiWhPQLpwkKhdV8aJ5GuCl01VQfDqUnTFtpaYW3CvHZzLDEuJBsAU3abJH1mMr2l8Sp9buxiN09U9VPpSlwvVvvmIx2/ZQpEW1RazvcGGog+X93M=; Received: from plenty.xoc.tele2net.at ([213.90.36.8]) by tatiana.utanet.at with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ckggj-0007Ce-7N for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 01:39:45 +0100 Received: from 193-83-15-166.adsl.highway.telekom.at ([193.83.15.166] helo=[10.0.0.93]) by plenty.xoc.tele2net.at with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1ckggj-0000QN-4j for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 01:39:45 +0100 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <1488760591.113814.901321736.78067F18@webmail.messagingengine.com> Subject: Re: archivers/libarchive fails to build From: Walter Schwarzenfeld Message-ID: <4b5e848e-d501-5237-8b1c-6d7308b5bec3@utanet.at> Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 01:39:44 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1488760591.113814.901321736.78067F18@webmail.messagingengine.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TELE2-Authenticated-As: cf62768e218b4d81d95cc5390f1bd9dfc8b05683 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 00:39:47 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217244 (But if it will removend, half of the repo on the servers had to be recompiled. Cause if lzmalib is installed other ports grap it, if the needed or not). From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 6 03:35:23 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55195CF7CC3 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 03:35:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lacey.leanne@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pf0-x230.google.com (mail-pf0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c00::230]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 166781062 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 03:35:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lacey.leanne@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pf0-x230.google.com with SMTP id v190so17930876pfb.1 for ; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 19:35:23 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fkufakCcvdQwDcaD9SZNwTS08OtSaPmlAYAgWBkWKJY=; b=HyjK+T4hQv22G6IbbqyYI1dmAITsiCMm3gJoTMeVyM3lp6mDRjPT30k6gagpaPIzzh NEmWgChNPWeBLLhUbmAuuxwx+P+HjA3SBKIVpQCmxdJ4qKUjC9llCv3gSvL2OZF2s0ER XI68OSkgFRU7qj+Omn8DmL26YpN6yBjSajZDQ6oqsEJh5Djd47g+Y9oH0Wsut3+yeJdU 9rolxpJAjUzBkzna+ESLufPiKlsLZKbJDX6hsiYGcJNfCPMiZ7yE4YT7K1GVrHLb0XNL Ur+pyvYr6WFrrpLFman1EZYB8SU8/KJydpYyASnwnekpauADCMs7T8gq0hRZA4H5i5BT J5aA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fkufakCcvdQwDcaD9SZNwTS08OtSaPmlAYAgWBkWKJY=; b=CU11gkf1m8uurO71unyai7iW9WD6Z1ciHYC2h2f7yfvi4nNFjFDFUdcfdzI/hLpPqF Uq+DwXbxrao3B8+TwFawQEFLiT9GJJ17yOVXFWtq/IYppQi4QxLJR4En0EJhi+PwgT21 Bja95pM9xy58QO9zeUp4wHIU5Ggxtfdz6W66B945XyXK2jZYp28SVCvOq+8uqnwKh1ZY WD74CESYoayMxlly6kEwhlTfdn0DkkQqAILax0ZSbYXcNB8cOraC69TRFD8AfdLSa1zu qQ32YYNV5cUi3+ybE0XGPCs5my8NJVCM+hdyHDMX4dFzyFaaTqK3s58RX9kEoveSWqZ5 Ccwg== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39ldPtbYpTODR1Z3XOghb5N+b/CzdGsOZjAZGPOuP+ezLGB6nL0nk2Bopz1kjtBDMw== X-Received: by 10.99.94.195 with SMTP id s186mr18099175pgb.197.1488771322227; Sun, 05 Mar 2017 19:35:22 -0800 (PST) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (c-24-20-4-87.hsd1.or.comcast.net. [24.20.4.87]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id n15sm1210367pfj.18.2017.03.05.19.35.21 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 05 Mar 2017 19:35:21 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Bug 213486 databases/pg_rman unbreak and update to 1.3.3 To: Kurt Jaeger , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20170305094214.GL13006@home.opsec.eu> <20170305095301.GM13006@home.opsec.eu> <20170305101147.GN13006@home.opsec.eu> From: Lacey Powers Message-ID: <87344820-8370-0586-21aa-bc00f8557438@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 19:35:20 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170305101147.GN13006@home.opsec.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 03:35:23 -0000 On 03/05/2017 02:11 AM, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >> Two build problems: > I submitted a patch, which builds with recent postgres, but fails > with 9.3. See the PR for more details. > Hello Kurt, Thanks for having a look at this, even though you've got little time. =) I updated the PR as well, after looking at what had been done. The shar file that I had added to that PR should address the issues. Please let me know what else I can do to help move this along. Best, Lacey From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 6 05:24:05 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3CDF4CFB177 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 05:24:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 0101015aa20ee171-ecc6cb8d-f042-40ca-b604-a3cf82dec978-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com) Received: from a27-34.smtp-out.us-west-2.amazonses.com (a27-34.smtp-out.us-west-2.amazonses.com [54.240.27.34]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 13851196E; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 05:24:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 0101015aa20ee171-ecc6cb8d-f042-40ca-b604-a3cf82dec978-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=stdm37fqbypyvw6iolbo3nkyd73es3w7; d=vmeta.jp; t=1488777568; h=MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Message-ID; bh=ppA1Ype9rep+YxPjA3jjIXgrnT5aBYGs4CMjJpdudhE=; b=CSUBjZfUbmxUb4Y1++a5z4Vf6qyHnKdsBgbgnCFZ+t4nDhXPVBe237+/ArDeA0YY gtzvFTZAk1LEdmqtz5mV0mLr2GwYqx4gt70/RxI0DvOMCKP+Ro5LXUZQJdiooSzRAgG hvFp6ik6S3erylZaJlw5XoyeiqVc9DQs4lQWeU28= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/simple; s=gdwg2y3kokkkj5a55z2ilkup5wp5hhxx; d=amazonses.com; t=1488777568; h=MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Message-ID:Feedback-ID; bh=ppA1Ype9rep+YxPjA3jjIXgrnT5aBYGs4CMjJpdudhE=; b=khW8hGvLVC62p5UfwYy6y1Bcg6lbsTJ2XXNW1pnwlvrudrp7u9bhq+MvuT6oRnSz O3/UQEQWCzWr68OxPld8Gij8r3vTSqE8VkryqS/JITQc0baFC3hvkWiCtx62AAdKJRy 5OxX61zfhHivEQgPJWU7fscaJOQ1cZcSTO69eQIg= X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on glory.vmeta.jp X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.9 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 05:19:28 +0000 From: Koichiro IWAO To: =?UTF-8?Q?Jean-S=C3=A9bastien_P=C3=A9dron?= Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: latest rust fails to install In-Reply-To: References: <0101015a92108238-4869ebf5-7547-470f-ba4d-7e9efde1e4f1-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> Message-ID: <0101015aa20ee171-ecc6cb8d-f042-40ca-b604-a3cf82dec978-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> X-Sender: meta+ports@vmeta.jp User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.3 X-SES-Outgoing: 2017.03.06-54.240.27.34 Feedback-ID: 1.us-west-2.ngRt4x2U/cWqug8pbfjwMxB6pcDw1fmN73bGmMLYyRI=:AmazonSES X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 05:24:05 -0000 > I would also need their approval to revert anything. We are all doing > this on our spare time and bapt@ and antoine@ are very busy with many > tasks. Let's give them some more time :) That's too bad. Reverting to unbroken state should be done quickly. We get stuck, cannot go forward or backward for now. Anyway, I understand the only thing we can do is to keep waiting, thanks. I have another question. Did the breakage commit pass review? I can't believe such easy mistakes were overlooked. -- `whois vmeta.jp | nkf -w` meta From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 6 06:52:53 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FFC3CFB30C; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 06:52:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (static-24-113-41-81.wavecable.com [24.113.41.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 312E11189; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 06:52:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id v266sdtn020464; Sun, 5 Mar 2017 22:54:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: "FreeBSD CURRENT" , "FreeBSD ports" From: "Chris H" Subject: How many versions of clang/llvm are currently required to maintain a system Date: Sun, 05 Mar 2017 22:54:45 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 06:52:53 -0000 I've finally been able to bootstrap CURRENT FreeBSD on some new hardware I picked up -- that is, successfully get world/kernel built/installed on it. I see there's a newer version of clang in base (4), which I had hoped that ports would pick up on, and use. But I suppose it's a bit early for ports to start requiring 4. That said; given the time it takes to build install fresh version(s) of these. Is there any way to limit the version /chosen/ by the ports tree/framework? It's painful firing up a build of a meta-port, and watch more than one version of clang/llvm be built for the BUILD_DEPENDS, only to have it cleaned and never installed, only to be built again, and again... You get the picture. :-) Anyway, as I indicated; I'm hoping to limit the ports framework to building/using only /one/ version; say >=3.9? I'd simply look through the system I have, but it's in a build session, that looks like it won't be finished for more than an hour. Thank you for all your time, and consideration. --Chris From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 6 07:16:09 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A43ECFB8FD; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 07:16:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [192.108.105.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.soaustin.net", Issuer "StartCom Class 2 IV Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1B3311E11; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 07:16:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from lonesome.com (bones.soaustin.net [192.108.105.22]) by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C49AF41A; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 01:16:01 -0600 (CST) Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 01:16:00 -0600 From: Mark Linimon To: Chris H Cc: FreeBSD CURRENT , FreeBSD ports Subject: Re: How many versions of clang/llvm are currently required to maintain a system Message-ID: <20170306071600.GA4150@lonesome.com> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 07:16:09 -0000 Please see https://wiki.freebsd.org/ObsoleteLLVMVersions . mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 6 08:17:12 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C4E5CFB957; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 08:17:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: from mx0.gid.co.uk (mx0.gid.co.uk [194.32.164.250]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E87291E3E; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 08:17:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: from [192.168.0.226] ([80.71.24.25]) by mx0.gid.co.uk (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id v268GklP036019; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 08:16:46 GMT (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: How many versions of clang/llvm are currently required to maintain a system From: Bob Bishop In-Reply-To: <20170306071600.GA4150@lonesome.com> Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 08:16:48 +0000 Cc: Chris H , FreeBSD CURRENT , FreeBSD ports Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20170306071600.GA4150@lonesome.com> To: Mark Linimon X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 08:17:12 -0000 Hi, A big chunk of this is down to lang/pure. The upstream links for pure at = bitbucket.org have mysteriously disappeared; those who care may get an = uneasy feeling. > On 6 Mar 2017, at 07:16, Mark Linimon wrote: >=20 > Please see https://wiki.freebsd.org/ObsoleteLLVMVersions . >=20 > mcl > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to = "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >=20 -- Bob Bishop rb@gid.co.uk From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 6 10:17:19 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50394CFA21D for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 10:17:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dumbbell@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.made4.biz (mail.made4.biz [IPv6:2001:41d0:2:c018::1:3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 115A6129C for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 10:17:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dumbbell@FreeBSD.org) Received: from 141.7.19.93.rev.sfr.net ([93.19.7.141] helo=magellan.dumbbell.fr) by mail.made4.biz with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ckphb-000E5w-01; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 11:17:16 +0100 Subject: Re: latest rust fails to install To: Koichiro IWAO References: <0101015a92108238-4869ebf5-7547-470f-ba4d-7e9efde1e4f1-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> <0101015aa20ee171-ecc6cb8d-f042-40ca-b604-a3cf82dec978-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jean-S=c3=a9bastien_P=c3=a9dron?= Message-ID: <01eb3188-2536-ad54-ae9c-05bd4625614e@FreeBSD.org> Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 11:17:08 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <0101015aa20ee171-ecc6cb8d-f042-40ca-b604-a3cf82dec978-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="jEfG1srcckig53l7O4q4tsHttwXHooH53" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 10:17:19 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --jEfG1srcckig53l7O4q4tsHttwXHooH53 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="B2r3pAv6d8itke1d0DHvSuOtC1cD52X6R"; protected-headers="v1" From: =?UTF-8?Q?Jean-S=c3=a9bastien_P=c3=a9dron?= To: Koichiro IWAO Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <01eb3188-2536-ad54-ae9c-05bd4625614e@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: latest rust fails to install References: <0101015a92108238-4869ebf5-7547-470f-ba4d-7e9efde1e4f1-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> <0101015aa20ee171-ecc6cb8d-f042-40ca-b604-a3cf82dec978-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> In-Reply-To: <0101015aa20ee171-ecc6cb8d-f042-40ca-b604-a3cf82dec978-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com> --B2r3pAv6d8itke1d0DHvSuOtC1cD52X6R Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 06.03.2017 06:19, Koichiro IWAO wrote: > I have another question. Did the breakage commit pass review? > I can't believe such easy mistakes were overlooked. It passed review because Poudriere was happy and the official packages builders are fine. The plist issue was known but I believed it was because of the influence of another port on my laptop, thus minor because ports should be built in a clean environment, especially Rust which conflicted with itself so far. Also, the latest version of Rust was needed to move forward with Firefox. It took some time already to get approval and I didn't consider the issue a showstopper. --=20 Jean-S=E9bastien P=E9dron --B2r3pAv6d8itke1d0DHvSuOtC1cD52X6R-- --jEfG1srcckig53l7O4q4tsHttwXHooH53 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCgAdFiEEZwh/0a6uDhLbxqbwOemXYaX9lMwFAli9NyoACgkQOemXYaX9 lMw8qRAA4OVKWieTDuiw8bR6lvqAkMpTkz/a0DVh7/zFk7taenuV/9Ig0gdMwU5o 4cFEgW4e+tOs3pFVFIGksRyld/xNuwTjmjrjhdYN+E/2zsYHOj5ztug2OgNZGcZl tyYJJOi3DjImf7mYLUj4r1PfY0+jZ8WAu3gBjwRhWrh9sM3UDq7QCjovLKXdzbxy PawRSoupGAe76CFFj7uwJlaRyP75tUJkZfht7tUt+dmP4vrv7aAjK0Al6KTzDumF Ij20QXMdsF8u8I/bQm2LUgc24Ga66AfTBPTf6CqDA9vFXLLGm6k2hQfZ5aXf/C77 FcNyE9d0tBRRPhkhSt8iaWFSanv8/kHmgSvh4lflKaLIB4Q2b8r2KXzMs3aRiGA4 g2bpaHJZla9V5mNa6hg5CjJZurCZhQfqPF9mXBoVGfNcGPUyuVnSs+qT+1Yhucut eWG9llJSGttzkEeqb5gSM15PFdNnbEEqXgg/csvBYxTLVdx4/DBRkn1yiaZ2tSj7 Cczh4HgtqTaXKhx8/6lfRKPk+AEnJ65bsYcNjIB+98wi+2ds/IQF9HScTkuvIVIm OLXX4rxoJEiodNlnQXohaCJ9iXy2uLjbsbgVdWUqp7M5D7/wZOo7dnEIqMfOl/7V SFF8AXh0+53bAhi0uq3p63+sCNLAJarX9vo/3KgIU8LOKII3wAk= =Gs37 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --jEfG1srcckig53l7O4q4tsHttwXHooH53-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 6 10:51:45 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1863CFB0FC for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 10:51:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68FDF1974 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 10:51:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from [88.217.109.93] (helo=localhost.unixarea.de) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1ckqEv-0006an-KW for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 11:51:41 +0100 Received: from localhost.my.domain (c720-r292778-amd64 [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.unixarea.de (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPS id v26Apeat003027 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 11:51:40 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.15.2/8.14.9/Submit) id v26Apeum003026 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 11:51:40 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 11:51:40 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: compiling ports w/ poudiere && gcc versions Message-ID: <20170306105140.GA2994@c720-r292778-amd64> Reply-To: Matthias Apitz Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT r292778 (amd64) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 88.217.109.93 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 10:51:45 -0000 Hello, Compiling my ~1760 ports with poudiere, pulls in makes four different gcc version: $ ls -C1 /usr/local/poudriere/PKGDIR.20160922/gcc* /usr/local/poudriere/PKGDIR.20160922/gcc-4.8.5_2.txz /usr/local/poudriere/PKGDIR.20160922/gcc-ecj-4.5.txz /usr/local/poudriere/PKGDIR.20160922/gcc46-4.6.4_5,1.txz /usr/local/poudriere/PKGDIR.20160922/gcc49-4.9.4.txz which ofc is very time consuming. Is there an easy way to let it compile and use only one (the best?) gcc version? Thanks matthias -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ guru@unixarea.de, ⌂ http://www.unixarea.de/ ☎ +49-176-38902045 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 6 10:59:12 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBEC4CFB279 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 10:59:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 815401DEC for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 10:59:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ckqMB-000H0E-K8; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 11:59:11 +0100 Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 11:59:11 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Matthias Apitz , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: compiling ports w/ poudiere && gcc versions Message-ID: <20170306105911.GO13006@home.opsec.eu> References: <20170306105140.GA2994@c720-r292778-amd64> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170306105140.GA2994@c720-r292778-amd64> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 10:59:12 -0000 Hi! > Compiling my ~1760 ports with poudiere, pulls in makes four different > gcc version: > > $ ls -C1 /usr/local/poudriere/PKGDIR.20160922/gcc* > /usr/local/poudriere/PKGDIR.20160922/gcc-4.8.5_2.txz > /usr/local/poudriere/PKGDIR.20160922/gcc-ecj-4.5.txz > /usr/local/poudriere/PKGDIR.20160922/gcc46-4.6.4_5,1.txz > /usr/local/poudriere/PKGDIR.20160922/gcc49-4.9.4.txz > > which ofc is very time consuming. Is there an easy way to let it compile > and use only one (the best?) gcc version? I name my jails after the OS versions, so I have $ poudriere jail -l JAILNAME VERSION ARCH [...] 103 10.3-RELEASE amd64 10i 10.3-RELEASE-p17 i386 11a 11.0-RELEASE-p1 amd64 11i 11.0-RELEASE-p1 i386 arm6 12.0-CURRENT r306902 arm.armv6 p64 12.0-CURRENT r306902 powerpc.powerpc64 cur 12.0-CURRENT r311531 amd64 93a 9.3-RELEASE-p48 amd64 93i 9.3-RELEASE-p48 i386 To build, I only have one ports tree, the default tree: $ poudriere ports -l PORTSTREE METHOD TIMESTAMP PATH default portsnap 2017-03-04 21:26:08 /pou/ports/default To use custom versions, I use /usr/local/etc/poudriere.d/11a-default-make.conf which contains this line: DEFAULT_VERSIONS= perl5=5.24 python=2.7 python3=3.6 ruby=2.3 pgsql=9.6 php=7.1 mysql=10.1m gcc=6 I'm not sure that this would limit the GCCs built to gcc6 (as some ports might request a specific version), but it's worth a try. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 3 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 6 11:25:46 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5D95CFBADE for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 11:25:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from smtp208.alice.it (smtp208.alice.it [82.57.200.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F4EC1A8E for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 11:25:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (82.52.25.226) by smtp208.alice.it (8.6.060.28) (authenticated as acanedi@alice.it) id 588F429306E7E1A4 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 12:25:37 +0100 Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v26BPGOu094392 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 12:25:16 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.ventu: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be alamar.ventu To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Andrea Venturoli Subject: Writing a port that simply installs a bunch of files Message-ID: <66d50818-f00e-9033-4c93-f159c38d04ba@netfence.it> Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 12:25:16 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 11:25:46 -0000 Hello. I'm trying to create a small ports for internal use. The simplest of these should just place a bunch of files into ${LOCALBASE}, so I thought I could create a tar archive containing those files, with the correct permissions, let "extract" do its work, then have the following: > do-install: > (cd ${WRKSRC} && ${CP} -pR . ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}) Alas the "extract-fixup-modes" target will ruins all this. Is there a way to achieve what I'm trying to achieve? Better yet, could I just somehow place my content under "files" and do without a distfile? bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 6 11:50:31 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4937ECFB3B0 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 11:50:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: from mail.grem.de (outcast.grem.de [213.239.217.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BC0C918F9 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 11:50:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: (qmail 23296 invoked by uid 89); 6 Mar 2017 11:50:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.250.192?) (mg@grem.de@46.244.129.140) by mail.grem.de with ESMTPA; 6 Mar 2017 11:50:22 -0000 Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Subject: Re: Writing a port that simply installs a bunch of files From: Michael Gmelin X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (14D27) In-Reply-To: <66d50818-f00e-9033-4c93-f159c38d04ba@netfence.it> Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 12:50:21 +0100 Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-Id: <32660472-60AF-47C0-861C-023BAFC39C3D@grem.de> References: <66d50818-f00e-9033-4c93-f159c38d04ba@netfence.it> To: Andrea Venturoli Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 11:50:31 -0000 > On 6 Mar 2017, at 12:25, Andrea Venturoli wrote: >=20 > Hello. >=20 > I'm trying to create a small ports for internal use. > The simplest of these should just place a bunch of files into ${LOCALBASE}= , so I thought I could create a tar archive containing those files, with the= correct permissions, let "extract" do its work, then have the following: >=20 >> do-install: >> (cd ${WRKSRC} && ${CP} -pR . ${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}) >=20 >=20 > Alas the "extract-fixup-modes" target will ruins all this. >=20 > Is there a way to achieve what I'm trying to achieve? >=20 >=20 >=20 > Better yet, could I just somehow place my content under "files" and do wit= hout a distfile? >=20 >=20 Yes, that's possible, see sysutils/bhyve-rc[0] for an example how to do it. -m [0] https://svnweb.freebsd.org/ports/head/sysutils/bhyve-rc/ From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 6 14:09:30 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 383C8CFBB42; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 14:09:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (static-24-113-41-81.wavecable.com [24.113.41.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F390D12EC; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 14:09:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id v26EBH0i076689; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 06:11:23 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: Mark Linimon Cc: FreeBSD CURRENT , FreeBSD ports In-Reply-To: <20170306071600.GA4150@lonesome.com> References: , <20170306071600.GA4150@lonesome.com> From: "Chris H" Subject: Re: How many versions of clang/llvm are currently required to maintain a system Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 06:11:23 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: <994f55ef467cbe5eb36fad343f70a4c3@ultimatedns.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 14:09:30 -0000 On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 01:16:00 -0600 Mark Linimon wrote > Please see https://wiki.freebsd.org/ObsoleteLLVMVersions . The perfect answer. Thank you, Mark! --Chris > > mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 6 14:16:47 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02148CFBEB6; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 14:16:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA8A71B7C; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 14:16:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1cktRB-000HM3-Lx; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 15:16:33 +0100 Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 15:16:33 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Bob Bishop Cc: Mark Linimon , FreeBSD CURRENT , FreeBSD ports , Chris H Subject: Re: How many versions of clang/llvm are currently required to maintain a system Message-ID: <20170306141633.GP13006@home.opsec.eu> References: <20170306071600.GA4150@lonesome.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 14:16:47 -0000 Hi! > A big chunk of this is down to lang/pure. The upstream links for > pure at bitbucket.org have mysteriously disappeared; those who care > may get an uneasy feeling. https://bitbucket.org/purelang/pure-lang/downloads/ has 0.66 ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 3 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 6 15:00:39 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10479CFAD01; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 15:00:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: from mx0.gid.co.uk (mx0.gid.co.uk [194.32.164.250]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9AB312D0; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 15:00:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: from [192.168.0.226] ([80.71.24.25]) by mx0.gid.co.uk (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id v26F0NRs015751; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 15:00:23 GMT (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: How many versions of clang/llvm are currently required to maintain a system From: rb@gid.co.uk In-Reply-To: <20170306141633.GP13006@home.opsec.eu> Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 15:00:23 +0000 Cc: Mark Linimon , FreeBSD CURRENT , FreeBSD ports , Chris H Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9442B4D5-FEAF-4BF1-9470-60897F97C13C@gid.co.uk> References: <20170306071600.GA4150@lonesome.com> <20170306141633.GP13006@home.opsec.eu> To: Kurt Jaeger X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 15:00:39 -0000 Hi, > On 6 Mar 2017, at 14:16, Kurt Jaeger wrote: >=20 > Hi! >=20 >> A big chunk of this is down to lang/pure. The upstream links for >> pure at bitbucket.org have mysteriously disappeared; those who care >> may get an uneasy feeling. >=20 > https://bitbucket.org/purelang/pure-lang/downloads/ >=20 > has 0.66 ? Let me rephrase that: the link http://purelang.bitbucket.org/ quoted on = https://wiki.freebsd.org/ObsoleteLLVMVersions doesn=E2=80=99t work, = should be https://bitbucket.org/purelang/ > --=20 > pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 3 years = to go ! >=20 -- Bob Bishop rb@gid.co.uk From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 6 15:02:11 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9CC8CFAE75 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 15:02:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from smtp208.alice.it (smtp208.alice.it [82.57.200.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE1781776 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 15:02:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (82.52.25.226) by smtp208.alice.it (8.6.060.28) (authenticated as acanedi@alice.it) id 588F429306F15574; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 16:02:05 +0100 Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v26F25l6035445; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 16:02:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.ventu: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be alamar.ventu Subject: Re: Writing a port that simply installs a bunch of files To: Michael Gmelin Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <66d50818-f00e-9033-4c93-f159c38d04ba@netfence.it> <32660472-60AF-47C0-861C-023BAFC39C3D@grem.de> From: Andrea Venturoli Message-ID: <5e3354dc-b597-7622-dbae-07d4119d1b7a@netfence.it> Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 16:02:05 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <32660472-60AF-47C0-861C-023BAFC39C3D@grem.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 15:02:12 -0000 On 03/06/17 12:50, Michael Gmelin wrote: > Yes, that's possible, see sysutils/bhyve-rc[0] for an example how to do it. Thanks for your answer: an example is really welcome. However, I might be dumb, but that does not fully cover what I was looking for. I see sysutils/bhyve-rc uses USE_RC_SUBR in order to install its only file, but that's specific to rc.d scripts. Suppose I want a mean to install generic files, should I use SUB_FILES? The first problem I encounter, then, is with subdirectories. Suppose I want to install /usr/local/a/b/c.txt, I would use "SUB_FILES=a/b/c.txt" and provide files/a/b/c.txt.in. However, I'll get: > cannot create /usr/ports/misc/xxx/work/a/b/c.txt: No such file or directory I've also tried "SUB_FILES=${WRKSRC}/a/b/c.txt", but then make will say: > ** Missing /usr/ports/misc/xxx/files//usr/ports/misc/xxx/work/xxx-y/a/b/c.txt.in for xxx-y. Am I missing something obvious? bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 6 15:13:09 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1F14CFB2B5 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 15:13:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 482254ac@razorfever.net) Received: from ironport2-out.teksavvy.com (ironport2-out.teksavvy.com [206.248.154.181]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.teksavvy.com", Issuer "DigiCert High Assurance CA-3" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F8B91E2E for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 15:13:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 482254ac@razorfever.net) X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BBBQAoe71Y/0StpUVeGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgjyBFScaI45zc48kAQEBAwUBgR4EKQGVDYINhiICgh5AGAECAQEBAQEBAWsohRYBBTgeMwsYLjkeEwgBAYlrDbIHin0MJoYJgkqCaoUghRkFkFWLVgEBnHEPhlGReIFDHziBAxIhLoc7IooqAQEB X-IPAS-Result: A0BBBQAoe71Y/0StpUVeGQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBBwEBAQEBgjyBFScaI45zc48kAQEBAwUBgR4EKQGVDYINhiICgh5AGAECAQEBAQEBAWsohRYBBTgeMwsYLjkeEwgBAYlrDbIHin0MJoYJgkqCaoUghRkFkFWLVgEBnHEPhlGReIFDHziBAxIhLoc7IooqAQEB X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.35,254,1484024400"; d="scan'208";a="294556031" Received: from 69-165-173-68.dsl.teksavvy.com (HELO mail.razorfever.net) ([69.165.173.68]) by smtp.teksavvy.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 06 Mar 2017 10:12:01 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (mail.razorfever.net [192.168.0.4]) by mail.razorfever.net (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTP id v26FBvAJ035512 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 10:11:58 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from 482254ac@razorfever.net) X-Authentication-Warning: mail.razorfever.net: Host mail.razorfever.net [192.168.0.4] claimed to be [127.0.0.1] Subject: Re: Recording TIMESTAMPs in distinfo for reproducible builds work To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: From: "Derek (freebsd lists)" <482254ac@razorfever.net> Message-ID: Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 10:11:57 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, FROM_STARTS_WITH_NUMS,RP_MATCHES_RCVD autolearn=disabled version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on mail.razorfever.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 15:13:09 -0000 On 16-05-12 02:08 PM, Ed Maste wrote: > Baptiste and I have been looking at reproducible builds in the FreeBSD > ports tree, and one thing we'll need is a consistent timestamp that > doesn't change when a port is rebuilt without changes. > Just wondering if any work has gone into consuming these timestamps in the tools? Specifically, looking at tar(1) from -head, I see that it doesn't current support the -mtime flag that GNU tar does, to be able to set the timestamp on all of the files being archived. Any thoughts on what the canonical way will be: e.g. a pass in advance with find/touch or if BSD tar is planned to support this internally? Thanks! Derek From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 6 15:22:28 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FC64CFB6D2 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 15:22:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thomas.e.zander@googlemail.com) Received: from mail-it0-x232.google.com (mail-it0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EC211576 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 15:22:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from thomas.e.zander@googlemail.com) Received: by mail-it0-x232.google.com with SMTP id m27so52051124iti.1 for ; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 07:22:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=RNMXO2t9liLu84B+o5DeLeeJYDdJYf+IafEzRzwwoHQ=; b=JwMFjFUnFUgQojwDDAXDXZOJ3xmohMzGBP5+4F7yq8ASrhkWapqCS8UCw5Gs8kwKLf 7mqdtJgHlGAohWM/G/jKf83t7d62zfy0WVsdUgqnfS1toTAkbLepkv8bTRJglrodQ1eH jMXC2znbgGanSpWD84h4fyNXGfaKI6k68MNSzbF4096zDwf5VQOEJJn8Tbzg4D4a4MoN cvHxyhlKQeeG+f4bBq6AvCQ2dpWK8+kmeU1DYi4Pq4UOsXM/LKzOobEoFsd+efwbTref QgDL9lydQxxDjfh+SLGKHwMMOBszGqzHTximlzuv3d7IKpE4OJyVo4FI/p+6ja0QH/hq SkdQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to; bh=RNMXO2t9liLu84B+o5DeLeeJYDdJYf+IafEzRzwwoHQ=; b=NcPqouPxsNlpR0TQ0eCoW+2HFi6jyTjM86SRuLrzbV6dU2kIY5ROgVdiUbN/8eDV++ D/pdfbhsv6adSqBhRKT0IvzspBCo+JFVzjuwC+c0kRl3M++OtnA1BbHC+enLbz58Nj35 1dRWDf8j/ntqJZDnf/W6we5c3nDnhmlrWzDBIVIRZvEheNNX04KJY+DAbJmMth/ZczJd Mv7IQJYFdxmA3blo2Agd06+sBGwr8bjuLBzWsyMwylV6MvBee/NEwBBZ7JHoPItd1900 sLoFvEP7eFOvPRY49pUScTO+G680n+5+rx0N/XUc5U5hgOj+FMqt0S5+9qDr8FiknZPL XIRQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lkF5h0QtcAL4sCh5lvo0Yd/jgn6m5Cb2Tzkexb90Rx3SZhjtiCIuMlXbBCTOeqms3oaSHsItB43Zku4A== X-Received: by 10.36.199.66 with SMTP id t63mr15079686itg.10.1488813747439; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 07:22:27 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: thomas.e.zander@googlemail.com Received: by 10.107.30.211 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 07:22:26 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <5e3354dc-b597-7622-dbae-07d4119d1b7a@netfence.it> References: <66d50818-f00e-9033-4c93-f159c38d04ba@netfence.it> <32660472-60AF-47C0-861C-023BAFC39C3D@grem.de> <5e3354dc-b597-7622-dbae-07d4119d1b7a@netfence.it> From: Thomas Zander Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 16:22:26 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: mRAH5LiWJjaZnWLvz7Mr5bHJtmA Message-ID: Subject: Re: Writing a port that simply installs a bunch of files To: Andrea Venturoli , FreeBSD Ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 15:22:28 -0000 On 6 March 2017 at 16:02, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > The first problem I encounter, then, is with subdirectories. > [...] Is it possible that you are looking for this: https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/install.html Or did I miss something from the question? Riggs From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 6 15:51:07 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF611CFB272 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 15:51:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: from mail.grem.de (outcast.grem.de [213.239.217.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 659A41169 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 15:51:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: (qmail 26295 invoked by uid 89); 6 Mar 2017 15:51:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO bsd64.grem.de) (mg@grem.de@194.97.158.70) by mail.grem.de with ESMTPA; 6 Mar 2017 15:51:05 -0000 Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 16:51:04 +0100 From: Michael Gmelin To: Andrea Venturoli Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Writing a port that simply installs a bunch of files Message-ID: <20170306165104.51c4f071@bsd64.grem.de> In-Reply-To: <5e3354dc-b597-7622-dbae-07d4119d1b7a@netfence.it> References: <66d50818-f00e-9033-4c93-f159c38d04ba@netfence.it> <32660472-60AF-47C0-861C-023BAFC39C3D@grem.de> <5e3354dc-b597-7622-dbae-07d4119d1b7a@netfence.it> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.2) X-Face: $wrgCtfdVw_H9WAY?S&9+/F"!41z'L$uo*WzT8miX?kZ~W~Lr5W7v?j0Sde\mwB&/ypo^}> +a'4xMc^^KroE~+v^&^#[B">soBo1y6(TW6#UZiC]o>C6`ej+i Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEWJBwe5BQDl LASZU0/LTEWEfHbyj0Txi32+sKrp1Mv944X8/fm1rS+cAAAACXBIWXMAAAsTAAAL EwEAmpwYAAAAB3RJTUUH3wESCxwC7OBhbgAAACFpVFh0Q29tbWVudAAAAAAAQ3Jl YXRlZCB3aXRoIFRoZSBHSU1QbbCXAAAAAghJREFUOMu11DFvEzEUAGCfEhBVFzuq AKkLd0O6VrIQsLXVSZXoWE5N1K3DobBBA9fQpRWc8OkWouaIjedWKiyREOKs+3PY fvalCNjgLVHeF7/3bMtBzV8C/VsQ8tecEgCcDgrzjekwKZ7TwsJZd/ywEKwwP+ZM 8P3drTsAwWn2mpWuDDuYiK1bFs6De0KUUFw0tWxm+D4AIhuuvZqtyWYeO7jQ4Aea 7jUqI+ixhQoHex4WshEvSXdood7stlv4oSuFOC4tqGcr0NjEqXgV4mMJO38nld4+ xKNxRDon7khyKVqY7YR4d+Cg0OMrkWXZOM7YDkEfKiilCn1qYv4mighZiynuHHOA Wq9QJq+BIES7lMFUtcikMnkDGHUoncA+uHgrP0ctIEqfwLHzeSo+eUA66AqzwN6n 2ZHJhw6Qh/PoyC/QENyEyC/AyNjq74Bs+3UH0xYwzDUC4B97HgLocg1QLYgDDO1v f3UX9Y307Ew4AHh67YAFFsxEpkXwpXY3eIgMhAAE3R19L919nNnuD2wlPcDE3UeT L2ytEICQib9BXgS2fU8PrD82ToYO1OEmMSnYTjSqSv9wdC0tPYC+rQRQD9ESnldF CyqfmiYW+tlALt8gH2xrMdC/youbjzPXEun+/ReXsMCDyve3dZc09fn2Oas8oXGc Jj6/fOeK5UmSMPmf/jL+GD8BEj0k/Fn6IO4AAAAASUVORK5CYII= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 15:51:08 -0000 On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 16:02:05 +0100 Andrea Venturoli wrote: > On 03/06/17 12:50, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > Yes, that's possible, see sysutils/bhyve-rc[0] for an example how > > to do it. > > Thanks for your answer: an example is really welcome. > > However, I might be dumb, but that does not fully cover what I was > looking for. > > I see sysutils/bhyve-rc uses USE_RC_SUBR in order to install its only > file, but that's specific to rc.d scripts. > Suppose I want a mean to install generic files, should I use > SUB_FILES? > > The first problem I encounter, then, is with subdirectories. > Suppose I want to install /usr/local/a/b/c.txt, I would use > "SUB_FILES=a/b/c.txt" and provide files/a/b/c.txt.in. > However, I'll get: > > cannot create /usr/ports/misc/xxx/work/a/b/c.txt: No such file or > > directory > > I've also tried "SUB_FILES=${WRKSRC}/a/b/c.txt", but then make will > say: > > ** > > Missing /usr/ports/misc/xxx/files//usr/ports/misc/xxx/work/xxx-y/a/b/c.txt.in > > for xxx-y. > > > Am I missing something obvious? > What about something like this (your files are in files/input.tgz)? # $FreeBSD: # PORTNAME= testport PORTVERSION= 1.0 CATEGORIES= sysutils MASTER_SITES= # none DISTFILES= # none EXTRACT_ONLY= # none MAINTAINER= you@example.org COMMENT= Blablabla NO_WRKSUBDIR= yes NO_BUILD= yes NO_INSTALL= yes post-install: @${TAR} -xf ${FILESDIR}/input.tgz -C ${STAGEDIR} @${FIND} ${STAGEDIR} -type f | ${SED} "s|${STAGEDIR}||" >> ${TMPPLIST} .include -- Michael Gmelin From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 6 16:05:08 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A641CFBA45 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 16:05:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: from mail.grem.de (outcast.grem.de [213.239.217.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AE7121F06 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 16:05:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: (qmail 26618 invoked by uid 89); 6 Mar 2017 16:05:06 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO bsd64.grem.de) (mg@grem.de@194.97.158.70) by mail.grem.de with ESMTPA; 6 Mar 2017 16:05:06 -0000 Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 17:05:05 +0100 From: Michael Gmelin To: Andrea Venturoli Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Writing a port that simply installs a bunch of files Message-ID: <20170306170505.7e043310@bsd64.grem.de> In-Reply-To: <20170306165104.51c4f071@bsd64.grem.de> References: <66d50818-f00e-9033-4c93-f159c38d04ba@netfence.it> <32660472-60AF-47C0-861C-023BAFC39C3D@grem.de> <5e3354dc-b597-7622-dbae-07d4119d1b7a@netfence.it> <20170306165104.51c4f071@bsd64.grem.de> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.2) X-Face: $wrgCtfdVw_H9WAY?S&9+/F"!41z'L$uo*WzT8miX?kZ~W~Lr5W7v?j0Sde\mwB&/ypo^}> +a'4xMc^^KroE~+v^&^#[B">soBo1y6(TW6#UZiC]o>C6`ej+i Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEWJBwe5BQDl LASZU0/LTEWEfHbyj0Txi32+sKrp1Mv944X8/fm1rS+cAAAACXBIWXMAAAsTAAAL EwEAmpwYAAAAB3RJTUUH3wESCxwC7OBhbgAAACFpVFh0Q29tbWVudAAAAAAAQ3Jl YXRlZCB3aXRoIFRoZSBHSU1QbbCXAAAAAghJREFUOMu11DFvEzEUAGCfEhBVFzuq AKkLd0O6VrIQsLXVSZXoWE5N1K3DobBBA9fQpRWc8OkWouaIjedWKiyREOKs+3PY fvalCNjgLVHeF7/3bMtBzV8C/VsQ8tecEgCcDgrzjekwKZ7TwsJZd/ywEKwwP+ZM 8P3drTsAwWn2mpWuDDuYiK1bFs6De0KUUFw0tWxm+D4AIhuuvZqtyWYeO7jQ4Aea 7jUqI+ixhQoHex4WshEvSXdood7stlv4oSuFOC4tqGcr0NjEqXgV4mMJO38nld4+ xKNxRDon7khyKVqY7YR4d+Cg0OMrkWXZOM7YDkEfKiilCn1qYv4mighZiynuHHOA Wq9QJq+BIES7lMFUtcikMnkDGHUoncA+uHgrP0ctIEqfwLHzeSo+eUA66AqzwN6n 2ZHJhw6Qh/PoyC/QENyEyC/AyNjq74Bs+3UH0xYwzDUC4B97HgLocg1QLYgDDO1v f3UX9Y307Ew4AHh67YAFFsxEpkXwpXY3eIgMhAAE3R19L919nNnuD2wlPcDE3UeT L2ytEICQib9BXgS2fU8PrD82ToYO1OEmMSnYTjSqSv9wdC0tPYC+rQRQD9ESnldF CyqfmiYW+tlALt8gH2xrMdC/youbjzPXEun+/ReXsMCDyve3dZc09fn2Oas8oXGc Jj6/fOeK5UmSMPmf/jL+GD8BEj0k/Fn6IO4AAAAASUVORK5CYII= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 16:05:08 -0000 On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 16:51:04 +0100 Michael Gmelin wrote: > On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 16:02:05 +0100 > Andrea Venturoli wrote: > > > On 03/06/17 12:50, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > > > > Yes, that's possible, see sysutils/bhyve-rc[0] for an example how > > > to do it. > > > > Thanks for your answer: an example is really welcome. > > > > However, I might be dumb, but that does not fully cover what I was > > looking for. > > > > I see sysutils/bhyve-rc uses USE_RC_SUBR in order to install its > > only file, but that's specific to rc.d scripts. > > Suppose I want a mean to install generic files, should I use > > SUB_FILES? > > > > The first problem I encounter, then, is with subdirectories. > > Suppose I want to install /usr/local/a/b/c.txt, I would use > > "SUB_FILES=a/b/c.txt" and provide files/a/b/c.txt.in. > > However, I'll get: > > > cannot create /usr/ports/misc/xxx/work/a/b/c.txt: No such file or > > > directory > > > > I've also tried "SUB_FILES=${WRKSRC}/a/b/c.txt", but then make will > > say: > > > ** > > > Missing /usr/ports/misc/xxx/files//usr/ports/misc/xxx/work/xxx-y/a/b/c.txt.in > > > for xxx-y. > > > > > > Am I missing something obvious? > > > > What about something like this (your files are in files/input.tgz)? > > # $FreeBSD: # > > PORTNAME= testport > PORTVERSION= 1.0 > CATEGORIES= sysutils > MASTER_SITES= # none > DISTFILES= # none > EXTRACT_ONLY= # none > > MAINTAINER= you@example.org > COMMENT= Blablabla > > NO_WRKSUBDIR= yes > NO_BUILD= yes > NO_INSTALL= yes > > post-install: > @${TAR} -xf ${FILESDIR}/input.tgz -C ${STAGEDIR} > @${FIND} ${STAGEDIR} -type f | ${SED} "s|${STAGEDIR}||" >> > ${TMPPLIST} > > .include > > > > Slightly cleaner version below, obviously you could use different tools to get the files into ${STAGEDIR}. # $FreeBSD: # PORTNAME= testport PORTVERSION= 1.0 CATEGORIES= sysutils MASTER_SITES= # none DISTFILES= # none EXTRACT_ONLY= # none MAINTAINER= you@example.org COMMENT= Blablabla NO_WRKSUBDIR= yes NO_BUILD= yes NO_INSTALL= yes post-install: @${TAR} -xf ${FILESDIR}/input.tgz -C ${STAGEDIR} @${FIND} ${STAGEDIR} -type f | \ ${SED} "s|^${STAGEDIR}||" >> ${TMPPLIST} .include -- Michael Gmelin From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 6 16:51:36 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 693F4CFB8A6 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 16:51:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from smtp209.alice.it (smtp209.alice.it [82.57.200.105]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02E3F1975; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 16:51:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (82.52.25.226) by smtp209.alice.it (8.6.060.28) (authenticated as acanedi@alice.it) id 588F429D063BB2B2; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 17:51:11 +0100 Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v26Gp7cK063873; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 17:51:07 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.ventu: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be alamar.ventu From: Andrea Venturoli Subject: Re: Writing a port that simply installs a bunch of files To: Thomas Zander , FreeBSD Ports References: <66d50818-f00e-9033-4c93-f159c38d04ba@netfence.it> <32660472-60AF-47C0-861C-023BAFC39C3D@grem.de> <5e3354dc-b597-7622-dbae-07d4119d1b7a@netfence.it> Message-ID: <7a4f9a71-ab9b-8859-951d-2d3f139269db@netfence.it> Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 17:51:07 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 16:51:36 -0000 On 03/06/17 16:22, Thomas Zander wrote: > On 6 March 2017 at 16:02, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > >> The first problem I encounter, then, is with subdirectories. >> [...] > > Is it possible that you are looking for this: > https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/install.html Yes and no. AFAICT this only gets half of what I'd like to achieve: _ it can in fact allow me to specify files permissions; _ however, I'll need to specify them manually in pkg-plist; since the permissions are already right in the tarball, I'd happily avoid this duplication. bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 6 16:51:34 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EA31CFB890 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 16:51:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from smtp207.alice.it (smtp207.alice.it [82.57.200.103]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2785F196C for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 16:51:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (82.52.25.226) by smtp207.alice.it (8.6.060.28) (authenticated as acanedi@alice.it) id 588F428307B0E7C3; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 17:45:43 +0100 Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v26GjggA061339; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 17:45:42 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.ventu: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be alamar.ventu Subject: Re: Writing a port that simply installs a bunch of files To: Michael Gmelin Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <66d50818-f00e-9033-4c93-f159c38d04ba@netfence.it> <32660472-60AF-47C0-861C-023BAFC39C3D@grem.de> <5e3354dc-b597-7622-dbae-07d4119d1b7a@netfence.it> <20170306165104.51c4f071@bsd64.grem.de> <20170306170505.7e043310@bsd64.grem.de> From: Andrea Venturoli Message-ID: <03dbd850-c6d5-f7e9-9b6a-41e38da5b485@netfence.it> Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 17:45:42 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170306170505.7e043310@bsd64.grem.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 16:51:34 -0000 On 03/06/17 17:05, Michael Gmelin wrote: >> What about something like this (your files are in files/input.tgz)? >> ... > NO_WRKSUBDIR= yes > NO_BUILD= yes > NO_INSTALL= yes > > post-install: > @${TAR} -xf ${FILESDIR}/input.tgz -C ${STAGEDIR} > @${FIND} ${STAGEDIR} -type f | \ > ${SED} "s|^${STAGEDIR}||" >> ${TMPPLIST} > > .include Guess this is what I was looking for (just the ${TAR} part)... basically overriding the "extract" phase. I modified ${STAGEDIR} to ${STAGEDIR}/${PREFIX}. Just why post-install and not do-install? bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 6 17:00:37 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74451CFBC7B for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 17:00:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: from mail.grem.de (outcast.grem.de [213.239.217.27]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id D82601F4F for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 17:00:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@grem.de) Received: (qmail 27312 invoked by uid 89); 6 Mar 2017 16:53:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO bsd64.grem.de) (mg@grem.de@194.97.158.70) by mail.grem.de with ESMTPA; 6 Mar 2017 16:53:54 -0000 Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 17:53:51 +0100 From: Michael Gmelin To: Andrea Venturoli Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Writing a port that simply installs a bunch of files Message-ID: <20170306175351.0de651d7@bsd64.grem.de> In-Reply-To: <03dbd850-c6d5-f7e9-9b6a-41e38da5b485@netfence.it> References: <66d50818-f00e-9033-4c93-f159c38d04ba@netfence.it> <32660472-60AF-47C0-861C-023BAFC39C3D@grem.de> <5e3354dc-b597-7622-dbae-07d4119d1b7a@netfence.it> <20170306165104.51c4f071@bsd64.grem.de> <20170306170505.7e043310@bsd64.grem.de> <03dbd850-c6d5-f7e9-9b6a-41e38da5b485@netfence.it> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.13.2 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd10.2) X-Face: $wrgCtfdVw_H9WAY?S&9+/F"!41z'L$uo*WzT8miX?kZ~W~Lr5W7v?j0Sde\mwB&/ypo^}> +a'4xMc^^KroE~+v^&^#[B">soBo1y6(TW6#UZiC]o>C6`ej+i Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAJFBMVEWJBwe5BQDl LASZU0/LTEWEfHbyj0Txi32+sKrp1Mv944X8/fm1rS+cAAAACXBIWXMAAAsTAAAL EwEAmpwYAAAAB3RJTUUH3wESCxwC7OBhbgAAACFpVFh0Q29tbWVudAAAAAAAQ3Jl YXRlZCB3aXRoIFRoZSBHSU1QbbCXAAAAAghJREFUOMu11DFvEzEUAGCfEhBVFzuq AKkLd0O6VrIQsLXVSZXoWE5N1K3DobBBA9fQpRWc8OkWouaIjedWKiyREOKs+3PY fvalCNjgLVHeF7/3bMtBzV8C/VsQ8tecEgCcDgrzjekwKZ7TwsJZd/ywEKwwP+ZM 8P3drTsAwWn2mpWuDDuYiK1bFs6De0KUUFw0tWxm+D4AIhuuvZqtyWYeO7jQ4Aea 7jUqI+ixhQoHex4WshEvSXdood7stlv4oSuFOC4tqGcr0NjEqXgV4mMJO38nld4+ xKNxRDon7khyKVqY7YR4d+Cg0OMrkWXZOM7YDkEfKiilCn1qYv4mighZiynuHHOA Wq9QJq+BIES7lMFUtcikMnkDGHUoncA+uHgrP0ctIEqfwLHzeSo+eUA66AqzwN6n 2ZHJhw6Qh/PoyC/QENyEyC/AyNjq74Bs+3UH0xYwzDUC4B97HgLocg1QLYgDDO1v f3UX9Y307Ew4AHh67YAFFsxEpkXwpXY3eIgMhAAE3R19L919nNnuD2wlPcDE3UeT L2ytEICQib9BXgS2fU8PrD82ToYO1OEmMSnYTjSqSv9wdC0tPYC+rQRQD9ESnldF CyqfmiYW+tlALt8gH2xrMdC/youbjzPXEun+/ReXsMCDyve3dZc09fn2Oas8oXGc Jj6/fOeK5UmSMPmf/jL+GD8BEj0k/Fn6IO4AAAAASUVORK5CYII= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 17:00:37 -0000 On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 17:45:42 +0100 Andrea Venturoli wrote: > On 03/06/17 17:05, Michael Gmelin wrote: > > >> What about something like this (your files are in files/input.tgz)? > >> ... > > > NO_WRKSUBDIR= yes > > NO_BUILD= yes > > NO_INSTALL= yes > > > > post-install: > > @${TAR} -xf ${FILESDIR}/input.tgz -C ${STAGEDIR} > > @${FIND} ${STAGEDIR} -type f | \ > > ${SED} "s|^${STAGEDIR}||" >> ${TMPPLIST} > > > > .include > > Guess this is what I was looking for (just the ${TAR} part)... > basically overriding the "extract" phase. > I modified ${STAGEDIR} to ${STAGEDIR}/${PREFIX}. > > Just why post-install and not do-install? > do-install will work as well, assuming you remove 'NO_INSTALL=1' from the Makefile. -m -- Michael Gmelin From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 6 17:23:39 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80B65CFBDD1 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 17:23:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (mx3.absolight.net [IPv6:2a01:678:2:100::25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "plouf.absolight.net", Issuer "CAcert Class 3 Root" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 205E6165C for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 17:23:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mat@FreeBSD.org) Received: from prod2.absolight.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28C37BDC89; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 18:23:36 +0100 (CET) Received: from ogg.in.absolight.net (ogg.in.absolight.net [79.143.241.239]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by prod2.absolight.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0520BBDC85; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 18:23:35 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Writing a port that simply installs a bunch of files To: Michael Gmelin , Andrea Venturoli References: <66d50818-f00e-9033-4c93-f159c38d04ba@netfence.it> <32660472-60AF-47C0-861C-023BAFC39C3D@grem.de> <5e3354dc-b597-7622-dbae-07d4119d1b7a@netfence.it> <20170306165104.51c4f071@bsd64.grem.de> <20170306170505.7e043310@bsd64.grem.de> <03dbd850-c6d5-f7e9-9b6a-41e38da5b485@netfence.it> <20170306175351.0de651d7@bsd64.grem.de> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Mathieu Arnold Organization: Absolight / The FreeBSD Foundation Message-ID: Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 18:23:33 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.11; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170306175351.0de651d7@bsd64.grem.de> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WhJSFcVT1Gvw2qJ9eUpeTG7e8di0tjURr" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 17:23:39 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --WhJSFcVT1Gvw2qJ9eUpeTG7e8di0tjURr Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="v0aHfRr5rWnhada17nTtkEjaugRTW6FCD"; protected-headers="v1" From: Mathieu Arnold To: Michael Gmelin , Andrea Venturoli Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: Writing a port that simply installs a bunch of files References: <66d50818-f00e-9033-4c93-f159c38d04ba@netfence.it> <32660472-60AF-47C0-861C-023BAFC39C3D@grem.de> <5e3354dc-b597-7622-dbae-07d4119d1b7a@netfence.it> <20170306165104.51c4f071@bsd64.grem.de> <20170306170505.7e043310@bsd64.grem.de> <03dbd850-c6d5-f7e9-9b6a-41e38da5b485@netfence.it> <20170306175351.0de651d7@bsd64.grem.de> In-Reply-To: <20170306175351.0de651d7@bsd64.grem.de> --v0aHfRr5rWnhada17nTtkEjaugRTW6FCD Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Le 06/03/2017 =C3=A0 17:53, Michael Gmelin a =C3=A9crit : > On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 17:45:42 +0100 > Andrea Venturoli wrote: > >> On 03/06/17 17:05, Michael Gmelin wrote: >> >>>> What about something like this (your files are in files/input.tgz)? >>>> ... =20 >>> NO_WRKSUBDIR=3D yes >>> NO_BUILD=3D yes >>> NO_INSTALL=3D yes >>> >>> post-install: >>> @${TAR} -xf ${FILESDIR}/input.tgz -C ${STAGEDIR} >>> @${FIND} ${STAGEDIR} -type f | \ >>> ${SED} "s|^${STAGEDIR}||" >> ${TMPPLIST} >>> >>> .include =20 >> Guess this is what I was looking for (just the ${TAR} part)... >> basically overriding the "extract" phase. >> I modified ${STAGEDIR} to ${STAGEDIR}/${PREFIX}. >> >> Just why post-install and not do-install? >> > do-install will work as well, assuming you remove 'NO_INSTALL=3D1' from= > the Makefile. Adding do-install to the Makefile will work regadless of NO_INSTALL statu= s. What NO_INSTALL does (like NO_BUILD does for the build phase) is to not generate a do-install target, but adding one in the Makefile will work just fine. (Of course, if you add a do-install target to the Makefile, NO_INSTALL becomes useless.) --=20 Mathieu Arnold --v0aHfRr5rWnhada17nTtkEjaugRTW6FCD-- --WhJSFcVT1Gvw2qJ9eUpeTG7e8di0tjURr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJYvZsXXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQzQUI2OTc4OUQyRUQxMjEwNjQ0MEJBNUIz QTQ1MTZGMzUxODNDRTQ4AAoJEDpFFvNRg85IjTMQALxjIf4Vxhm+Fb1SfTS6Eye/ 0JcKyFXaxtsc/tsFm+ZnKrH04w1kJAVpyTfvavN1UrqObt9n58RzFHZeMq95fcIw FMubZHYdCKbcmALwFr1XBh8ij9ZQn5AeblAaL84Z3Xbqtn+9bXngSgJ3pHdyR+qc loDQH2DmWqpq0pqoj9Xxc6s5YZNMO+sCsqKNE/nI3hcyfUU4ydYUTvfEhsool/UX 89z0EUVZVXhY61unSZzVUeMBzbABkop1Emly3mh0lBZCISaMfsWozzAUvY2AHNxN pESKg6AOIIYO419RuTfl0TditS6HFOcKVDx0lCKvxFZu+MycJc2cVAy++fZwLo5u POMSbErXojOgcQbrriKSMbeE5BKAt8kUC0S4lebBO3gNuAntGcmNb4Zc+ITJ/UcR xYGt3LNDUMfs1vCa6lm3cxffDxlk92Xzzzssj9+eF8iT1Mq24FXf1vuUBazbS6XU TiFR8E6EiOyjLQdt3ocLYKM8rfhs83SdTt6W7xtEzB9wE4ZtYFw1ph3sVbOk82rb CLuGvhSuRnQWjvpma1rUbTsZl01ifV4lXJL+2q4FxOLePJAjI/g3iAd9vC/LnYyD Xk8uzk+BHdqD65FnKGCgnD//U2uYDQsmZa0Wl/j9jDm2qMYzbuW01Tp7zqxmas5F rWswBM0si6DvufnB/NT9 =+Fcp -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --WhJSFcVT1Gvw2qJ9eUpeTG7e8di0tjURr-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 6 17:43:52 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AD2ACFA6E0 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 17:43:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jochen.rassler@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5B6F139A for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 17:43:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jochen.rassler@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id DC3A3CFA6DE; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 17:43:51 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB801CFA6DC; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 17:43:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jochen.rassler@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x22f.google.com (mail-wm0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61C0A138D; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 17:43:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jochen.rassler@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x22f.google.com with SMTP id n11so71121946wma.0; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 09:43:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:subject:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=LmoT1KvzocGCyk2tssJKoSt8Bsb7ssfUgbvVMYG/yI0=; b=Swda69yOeLEka2pwCWuBXzoh/qSErruAJ8KD6OvpXe6qr/1PqJ4xfJBfNAhZEHaaWC o4SB8X+HKi7t7dldANKZW7ddgln74XBtUUUN3nVJ7A78WxTU7ynqDXLw6HN8kZbpcvdG f8G7h708ZSWj2d7qLpS8rbL5uxnt8txyhU+kwK+hd9LCk96WhrK1L9FfwjuO3URGLFj5 aIAXB+MvJFTVE6wju4pPS8pbdetRDjllJCbqW2otMicAWOpW1Jb2HkC+PUa3xJ333fXZ FYBwwkLtWgx4Va6oleesxe9aVV+7dKhgrwxwMU8wtvOwKVeJ5OfamccXfpEb493vGGOt b3VA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=LmoT1KvzocGCyk2tssJKoSt8Bsb7ssfUgbvVMYG/yI0=; b=BN8xEVuGWZ3nvOY2jjOlAutOGb/cjExLkXrgYELTFv8KFSM+txt2kXgHz6cgbgKKbl WxMSXLYdcfG2ZhefBz+8zIipgtn8SLCn0ryZK8jm8LNgjLufkvuhxdB43up6PfB+9+pU C83G+nIrUMDwjJvPgd0E/KVJBU4Fg7tFSLCyKf49RR0MCEX1tds/5udyWNd+tntKjIYw fiLEO9YYytDXU1ZBwkpcaOKMroKxtpf2RH68Lhv1NZ67c+2MOjnpTLBtteiMhjNad0sk E4Q1I2Idsufm2vM30GsDYh4i7rNfi1ruXyoME6bqiC/fgajXPaCqmIrQfC+0C7Es7tem bUbg== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39n1QsQFvM7LVAvsLUwU75J5B8IkDM+CKQJxV15fglgZBIFkej0QnrIylQOxTEaPLA== X-Received: by 10.28.47.7 with SMTP id v7mr14003003wmv.138.1488822229487; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 09:43:49 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (port-92-202-126-145.dynamic.qsc.de. [92.202.126.145]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id e6sm27820764wrc.30.2017.03.06.09.43.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 06 Mar 2017 09:43:48 -0800 (PST) From: "=?UTF-8?Q?Dr._Jochen_Ra=c3=9fler?=" X-Google-Original-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Dr._Jochen_Ra=c3=9fler?= To: java@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: openjfx8-devel future question Message-ID: <6f550c7d-5228-58fd-4a5c-e3142819331b@googlemail.com> Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 18:43:48 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 170306-0, 06.03.2017), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 17:43:52 -0000 Hi there, currently I'm developing a email client using OpenJDK8 and openJFX8 (and of course javamail) under FreeBSD 11 STABLE. I'd like to use the HTMLEditor widget, which is part of the JavaFX framework, but not running under the above mentioned configuration, as openjfx does not compile against webkit (or parts of it). There are more such artifacts, as for example MP3 player widget, which needs gstreamer. Obviously, those dependencies are defined for the package, but not included by the gradle build script for FreeBSD. This might be, because of some maven repositories, as e.g. webview (https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/sun/webkit/webview-deps/1.3/) having no FreeBSD definition files. Are there any plans to include full openjfx support in the next FreeBSD release or any integration for the upcoming OpenJDK9? Maybe is there already support in CURRENT? Is there any political reason not to include those packages (license,..)? Regards, Jochen --- Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren gepr=C3=BCft. https://www.avast.com/antivirus From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 6 17:55:39 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 967A5CFACE5 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 17:55:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 866C11D93 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 17:55:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 81DD9CFACE3; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 17:55:39 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7DEA0CFACE0; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 17:55:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 40BC01D8F; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 17:55:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ckwrE-000Hoj-Tv; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 18:55:40 +0100 Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 18:55:40 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dr=2E_Jochen_Ra=DFler?= Cc: java@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: openjfx8-devel future question Message-ID: <20170306175540.GQ13006@home.opsec.eu> References: <6f550c7d-5228-58fd-4a5c-e3142819331b@googlemail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6f550c7d-5228-58fd-4a5c-e3142819331b@googlemail.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 17:55:39 -0000 Hi! > currently I'm developing a email client using OpenJDK8 and openJFX8 (and > of course javamail) under FreeBSD 11 STABLE. Interesting. > I'd like to use the HTMLEditor widget, which is part of the JavaFX > framework, but not running under the above mentioned configuration, as > openjfx does not compile against webkit (or parts of it). There are more > such artifacts, as for example MP3 player widget, which needs gstreamer. > Obviously, those dependencies are defined for the package, but not > included by the gradle build script for FreeBSD. This might be, because > of some maven repositories, as e.g. webview > (https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/sun/webkit/webview-deps/1.3/) having > no FreeBSD definition files. >From what I understand: If you have java code that needs to be compiled using maven, maven automagically fetches dependencies from the maven repos out there. The problem for a freebsd port is: during the build phase not 'fetch from extern' is allowed, so we need to explicitly name the distfiles to be fetched before, which breaks a lot of the maven assumptions and is a mess to maintain. > Are there any plans to include full openjfx support in the next FreeBSD > release or any integration for the upcoming OpenJDK9? > Maybe is there > already support in CURRENT? Is there any political reason not to include > those packages (license,..)? The problem is the build process in the ports framework. If someone would integrate the fetch-distfile process of maven in the ports framework, all those java codes build using maven would be become much more simpler to maintain. See the discussion in https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188110#c37 and followups. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 3 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 6 18:15:28 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DBFACFBB4F for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 18:15:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jochen.rassler@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 686381FE6 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 18:15:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jochen.rassler@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 61CB4CFBB4C; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 18:15:28 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61120CFBB4A; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 18:15:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jochen.rassler@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm0-x233.google.com (mail-wm0-x233.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::233]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6C961FE4; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 18:15:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jochen.rassler@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm0-x233.google.com with SMTP id t193so71865348wmt.1; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 10:15:27 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:subject:to:references:cc:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WbUGofFrs7ErAwHAep9KTFyg8XSxg47fryotAsWTJv8=; b=OiSvOK4+hOtaTRlLYh1NsR7IBn+EGEvq7B4t0V8/GCCmgELLlOYzF73cik1FBWNNJM BePYIXaLydsAEKiyfzi09xr8gtNv9ijW+PF3nafzp0gAP4x5FSaJADWfGE0UQ0aJilUh tNQUka+UBeCerPrQEDcTRYpTi1ceNx0uSkO6VrFRwgfGB6HbAWNPTBCLjMgYOxY7ChFm r9uWWG79OmJ8ZTuVa/j4xLIwIpmWpEHsGrhMh9QTj8Pruby27g0tBMWRwWPxvQJLA0il H8gJTjpbqBrH/MzJ1JeBataGbFoqqDkpq+nNn+YWFwVzI8b1FlgeF74qiNxzxKoOAhE+ uy2A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:subject:to:references:cc:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=WbUGofFrs7ErAwHAep9KTFyg8XSxg47fryotAsWTJv8=; b=juUHgiMqHUtVgNScPB1wFxSWCvXwGbPYOp7AwpcNIF6FEgpfdgASPTMslsBjLLJomG Z44hS0oZWhuGGBiayOlBCwYjwBn22IL5yWqX5jiIkHC6rpBnOIvE9l4LH3ZifN/+Elby lxJB2MmC1U38fzH194Zn+tcz7EqqiweexE5ZAl+9joa+3kBsQq11k0fIvOAkypwaEHfy CyFRb8yfNJR98olOeutLOrDARn7BRz4wtRcMT+FrY+CTRwBI8qvK7dv9tluiXYdaV7Vm f+6AoYdcJ+lrSqbujzPYI29o10VIVLdxlTwZLRNSk8dVwDsJS7NxUAbAvAsMxh/f1MZC pfbA== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39keDn+6thBkU3GNS2u1Ya4djEiWArAymFpt99DitOvOYrM5+XtSxQVeQCqFIsbuNg== X-Received: by 10.28.88.129 with SMTP id m123mr15390244wmb.28.1488824126081; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 10:15:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (port-92-202-126-145.dynamic.qsc.de. [92.202.126.145]) by smtp.googlemail.com with ESMTPSA id 128sm15846249wmp.11.2017.03.06.10.15.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 06 Mar 2017 10:15:25 -0800 (PST) From: "=?UTF-8?Q?Dr._Jochen_Ra=c3=9fler?=" X-Google-Original-From: =?UTF-8?Q?Dr._Jochen_Ra=c3=9fler?= Subject: Re: openjfx8-devel future question To: Kurt Jaeger , =?UTF-8?Q?Dr._Jochen_Ra=c3=9fler?= References: <6f550c7d-5228-58fd-4a5c-e3142819331b@googlemail.com> <20170306175540.GQ13006@home.opsec.eu> Cc: java@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <2f6cc49f-a878-5567-7c46-6411893d3cb5@googlemail.com> Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 19:15:25 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170306175540.GQ13006@home.opsec.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 170306-0, 06.03.2017), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 18:15:28 -0000 Thank you Kurt for your reply. I have to look more detailed into this. I'm quite new to FreeBSD on the one hand an the gradle build tool on the other hand. (And gradle is what is used by openjfx) What I understood currently is that gradle downloads the dependencies only for building the package. To run a application, the dependencies have to be installed, otherwise the application will crash with some exceptions (in case of Java). So there seems to be a difference between FreeBSD ports and dependencies to the build process. Why does the ports system not build and install the dependencies firstly and use those installed packages for the further build process? They will be needed anyway for the completely build package... Or maybe I am missing a important point... regards, Jochen Am 06.03.2017 um 18:55 schrieb Kurt Jaeger: > Hi! > >> currently I'm developing a email client using OpenJDK8 and openJFX8 (and= >> of course javamail) under FreeBSD 11 STABLE. > > Interesting. > >> I'd like to use the HTMLEditor widget, which is part of the JavaFX >> framework, but not running under the above mentioned configuration, as >> openjfx does not compile against webkit (or parts of it). There are more= >> such artifacts, as for example MP3 player widget, which needs gstreamer.= >> Obviously, those dependencies are defined for the package, but not >> included by the gradle build script for FreeBSD. This might be, because >> of some maven repositories, as e.g. webview >> (https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/com/sun/webkit/webview-deps/1.3/) having= >> no FreeBSD definition files. > > From what I understand: If you have java code that needs to be compiled > using maven, maven automagically fetches dependencies from > the maven repos out there. > > The problem for a freebsd port is: during the build phase not > 'fetch from extern' is allowed, so we need to explicitly name > the distfiles to be fetched before, which breaks a lot of the > maven assumptions and is a mess to maintain. > >> Are there any plans to include full openjfx support in the next FreeBSD >> release or any integration for the upcoming OpenJDK9? >> Maybe is there >> already support in CURRENT? Is there any political reason not to include= >> those packages (license,..)? > > The problem is the build process in the ports framework. > > If someone would integrate the fetch-distfile process of maven > in the ports framework, all those java codes build using maven > would be become much more simpler to maintain. > > See the discussion in > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D188110#c37 > > and followups. > --- Diese E-Mail wurde von Avast Antivirus-Software auf Viren gepr=C3=BCft. https://www.avast.com/antivirus From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 6 19:07:35 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ABCCDCFCA7F for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 19:07:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B2EA1FA7 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 19:07:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 97C2ECFCA7D; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 19:07:35 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9715FCFCA7B; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 19:07:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BC5C1FA5; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 19:07:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ckxyr-000Hw0-Bo; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 20:07:37 +0100 Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 20:07:37 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Dr=2E_Jochen_Ra=DFler?= Cc: java@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: openjfx8-devel future question Message-ID: <20170306190737.GR13006@home.opsec.eu> References: <6f550c7d-5228-58fd-4a5c-e3142819331b@googlemail.com> <20170306175540.GQ13006@home.opsec.eu> <2f6cc49f-a878-5567-7c46-6411893d3cb5@googlemail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2f6cc49f-a878-5567-7c46-6411893d3cb5@googlemail.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 19:07:35 -0000 Hi! > I'm quite new to FreeBSD on the one hand an the gradle build tool on the > other hand. (And gradle is what is used by openjfx) > > What I understood currently is that gradle downloads the dependencies > only for building the package. To run a application, the dependencies > have to be installed, So the dependencies have to be defined as RUN_DEPENDS in the port Makefile. > otherwise the application will crash with some > exceptions (in case of Java). So there seems to be a difference between > FreeBSD ports and dependencies to the build process. The ports system knows different types of dependencies (LIB_, RUN_, BUILD_ etc) > Why does the ports system not build and install the dependencies firstly > and use those installed packages for the further build process? Depends on the port -- sometimes the port maintainer did not specify all the dependencies in a proper manner. Sometimes, some dependencies are not needed in every use case, so they are marked optional. There are many different reasons how this can be resolved. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 3 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 6 19:50:20 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33F77CFBD91 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 19:50:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22A951ADD for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 19:50:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 17FAACFBD90; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 19:50:20 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 179AACFBD8F for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 19:50:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D02EC1ADC for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 19:50:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1ckyeE-000IK3-4x; Mon, 06 Mar 2017 20:50:22 +0100 Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 20:50:22 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Sid Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Tendra compiler Message-ID: <20170306195022.GS13006@home.opsec.eu> References: <20170225050751.GZ13006@home.opsec.eu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 19:50:20 -0000 Hi! > Sorry for the late reply. They've answered it in the FreeBSD > mailing list, and I'm guessing you have already read it. There's > not much information on the newer website. There's a snippet on how to download the latest version. svn co svn://svn.tendra.org/trunk tendra Then one has to build the source. I've gave it a quick test, it has issues. Have you tried to build it ? -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 3 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 6 20:10:01 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4888DCFC4CF for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 20:10:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ms-roaming-data@outlook.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 159B71937 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 20:10:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ms-roaming-data@outlook.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 12361CFC4CD; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 20:10:01 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FFE0CFC4CC; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 20:10:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ms-roaming-data@outlook.com) Received: from COL004-OMC4S2.hotmail.com (col004-omc4s2.hotmail.com [65.55.34.204]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "*.outlook.com", Issuer "Microsoft IT SSL SHA2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BAAB71935; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 20:10:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ms-roaming-data@outlook.com) Received: from EUR01-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([65.55.34.200]) by COL004-OMC4S2.hotmail.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(7.5.7601.23008); Mon, 6 Mar 2017 12:08:54 -0800 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outlook.com; s=selector1; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=4KKRsPT/IpWxQvIjXrPrl+hPHGzDY3RUu9kJQSv8bnA=; b=b4Kt33BE8FApl+8m6isSvwz5hAChRpCPOkvW2MIC1h5C/8cMI/b2wFszdhCtz+rSgLnlFnqcT02DOnGbtu8+RCtyqHCgpFe8a3nd8wK3TgCKpoRmL6PETARNnFiQYO3DbIda+87e5IIbSylFvDTCGr2Dx8pPpiSASfql7QFsnQTA7IeXkr+HhWpfPa+SIJZbC2MStWzh6nL2MLvEDcgVQ/z/vVWZib0aoodKAyp0F401iznXmeRtkA+LH7ehZZqXUnut+omWJNBSCXLBIPcHo/pqa8pdVEzdS8yHYfVthfqtiFwvoPDrcmLm61JGXkFoyVD4HxpRqOrroCboH6Fsqg== Received: from DB5EUR01FT005.eop-EUR01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.4.57) by DB5EUR01HT034.eop-EUR01.prod.protection.outlook.com (10.152.5.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.933.11; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 20:08:52 +0000 Received: from HE1PR0901MB1529.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com (10.152.4.60) by DB5EUR01FT005.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.4.131) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.947.7 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 20:08:52 +0000 Received: from HE1PR0901MB1529.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com ([10.168.97.140]) by HE1PR0901MB1529.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com ([10.168.97.140]) with mapi id 15.01.0947.012; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 20:08:52 +0000 From: Microsoft Roaming To: "x11@FreeBSD.org" CC: "ports@FreeBSD.org" Subject: FreeBSD Port: xf86-video-intel-2.99.917.20170228 Thread-Topic: FreeBSD Port: xf86-video-intel-2.99.917.20170228 Thread-Index: AQHSlrRjP7tNSMpR/0yhvZPuSbkMRg== Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 20:08:51 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US Content-Language: fr-FR X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: FreeBSD.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;FreeBSD.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=outlook.com; x-incomingtopheadermarker: OriginalChecksum:499E9AF05C06BDBFD4DFF1C31F0AB00147DF67382CCFF8B4CDB71583E59C81B6; UpperCasedChecksum:ED1C43D3AEB69DB9497DD7F3AA94A2EFE4D4F92ECE03606061C0522675905807; SizeAsReceived:7687; Count:38 x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1 x-tmn: [NZvV9EgvnX8nqRevjkuOM10XkIKpPWg+] x-incomingheadercount: 38 x-eopattributedmessage: 0 x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DB5EUR01HT034; 5:PcMSCH0IMQSqGlrEgaf1pdPksxmbUbgBsHGKKtZ8v7VI7kyuzK/kXT7Sy5jwqWVb3ATUs75QALarKSPD2tRDvJgQ2CkakUES24rpOoUw9Ng7J0fcL9wJIABO8/LaTdBruVecm9LA7yQh9LCzwyj8uA==; 24:XlkBSW1wWSkli5FjQCH+StFDfgfqCUY8l/gVV6MpNv8l6vaK2Rj94S8HIHQ3qzTPJWMIGuDTU1/1nH7IjAKkOEwDCwDqKlMBBDNTpuezthk=; 7:F27l3LaOLoTk3ujNOhJ47sUAIkI/uoNLGuxqbxI4RwYh0jS+oGwR+rQr4vqQEeWelTIqjjArI/VAeGstPAigCBzoGUOYXnjADjX6GWua0hIeVZD6DjEpjqwwGw1mynzpksLCri1AEZw6gRaFHhR07nFG0p1IbfdYszE61dSJ5NmEbhU2CQx2iDAFHht1npuW9YYlYFQZGonlXjniuHdPgOjohh2fQoBwCxkylyzArIZL1xt5XXGxJ+ZhvfwNFCBMEjkLDD14JrKRsk+aAhGIO1k/O3RW5a0ONuceM82gY2raFyUKPMVhGq6UEEUKB12/ x-forefront-antispam-report: EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(98900016); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DB5EUR01HT034; H:HE1PR0901MB1529.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 84a3cb51-c9e1-43d0-f555-08d464cc9c0f x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(201702061074)(5061506573)(5061507331)(1603103135)(1601125254)(1603101448)(1701031045); SRVR:DB5EUR01HT034; x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(432015087)(444000031); SRVR:DB5EUR01HT034; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DB5EUR01HT034; x-forefront-prvs: 0238AEEDB0 spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: outlook.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 06 Mar 2017 20:08:51.7667 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Internet X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 84df9e7f-e9f6-40af-b435-aaaaaaaaaaaa X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DB5EUR01HT034 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 06 Mar 2017 20:08:54.0167 (UTC) FILETIME=[7ADC4A70:01D296B5] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 20:10:01 -0000 Hello, Please U R G E N T L Y mark this port as broken or roll back to the revisio= n r433863 Invoking =91X=92 now causes crashes. Even when I force deactivation of any = acceleration in the xorg.conf, it crashes. The sole solution is to use the = sfcb or vesa driver, it crashes also with driver modesetting So I suspect it could be an issue related to KMS I rolled back to r433863 and it works back NOTE : tested on an old HP laptop 2530p Best Regards, David Provenance : Courrier pou= r Windows 10 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 6 21:38:43 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B699CFCC24 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 21:38:43 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from graham@menhennitt.com.au) Received: from homiemail-a48.g.dreamhost.com (sub5.mail.dreamhost.com [208.113.200.129]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 28D1811C8 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 21:38:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from graham@menhennitt.com.au) Received: from homiemail-a48.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a48.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9396570D4A00 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 13:38:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=menhennitt.com.au; h= subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= menhennitt.com.au; bh=GDQ+pr/GGGdps/gKT6fDin4F/mU=; b=hvzXv5lSrn IbbtZQ3ICIN7hmRk9lUk1v21wnqaQTuaBf1ueAm8slu/h8e4P+z2OS9JeKPLnVZU kudttwL9nJIqr5OR4lhjdSFmFltnrE5lSGFTvSqaJSzYKYjOQVNXt3gIFeXJJXX4 L+rOg1cUIrBywFmqHTF2ikZ49+QGlv39g= Received: from [137.237.172.21] (unknown [192.160.117.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: graham@menhennitt.com.au) by homiemail-a48.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D94CB70D4333 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 13:38:35 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: linker errors for OpenGL functions To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <99eb9add-a30b-0445-2f64-8b801d9072db@menhennitt.com.au> From: Graham Menhennitt Message-ID: <58d6ed8f-5ca0-d7b9-4683-ff3db5ce98c6@menhennitt.com.au> Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 08:38:33 +1100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 21:38:43 -0000 On 6/03/2017 11:29 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Graham Menhennitt >> I've screwed up something on my system. When I try to build the >> x11/kde4-workspace port, I get a pile of linker errors. I'm guessing that I >> just need to reinstall some other OpenGL port, but I can't find out which >> one. Any clues, please? >> >> Thanks, >> >> Graham >> >> >> /usr/local/lib/qt4/libQtOpenGL.so.4: undefined reference to `glBegin' >> c++: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see >> invocation) >> gmake[4]: *** [ksmserver/screenlocker/greeter/CMakeFiles/kscreenlocker_greet.dir/build.make:283: >> ksmserver/screenlocker/greeter/kscreenlocker_greet] Error 1 >> gmake[4]: Leaving directory '/usr/ports_build/usr/data/Fre >> eBSD/ports/x11/kde4-workspace/work/.build' >> gmake[3]: *** [CMakeFiles/Makefile2:8345: ksmserver/screenlocker/greeter >> /CMakeFiles/kscreenlocker_greet.dir/all] Error 2 >> gmake[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... >> > Do you have any older versions of llvm installed? OpenGL has issues if > anything older that llvm38 (maybe llvm39) is installed. "pkg delete -f > llvm3?" for each version prior to 3.9 installed. It is quite unlikely that > you will find any dependencies on the old versions. You can use "pkg info > -d llvm3?" to confirm. It is possible that some port or another might need > a re-install, but I have yet to see a report of this. > Hi Kevin, Thanks for replying. Unfortunately, no, I only have llvm39 installed. That's not to say I haven't had other versions installed in the past. In fact, I suspect that cleaning up my system is exactly what broke this. I'll try reinstalling some more ports. Thanks again, Graham From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 6 22:58:21 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D43A0CFB714; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 22:58:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from citapm.icyb.net.ua (citapm.icyb.net.ua [212.40.38.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF5BB1636; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 22:58:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from porto.starpoint.kiev.ua (porto-e.starpoint.kiev.ua [212.40.38.100]) by citapm.icyb.net.ua (8.8.8p3/ICyb-2.3exp) with ESMTP id AAA08382; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 00:58:15 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from avg@FreeBSD.org) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]) by porto.starpoint.kiev.ua with esmtp (Exim 4.34 (FreeBSD)) id 1cl1a3-000Ern-6O; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 00:58:15 +0200 Subject: Re: Thunderbird and UPDATING 20170302 To: gecko@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, cmt@FreeBSD.org, Andrea Venturoli References: <89c5cb74-5884-8f58-2f87-5a52f7d99200@FreeBSD.org> From: Andriy Gapon Message-ID: Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 00:57:38 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <89c5cb74-5884-8f58-2f87-5a52f7d99200@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 22:58:21 -0000 FWIW, the following "hack" allowed me to keep my current profile and re-enabled lightning in it. First, I removed the addon before upgrading thunderbird. Not sure if this was a requirement. After upgrading thunderbird and mucking with it for some time I did the following. Shut down thunderbird. Backed up ~/.thunderbird//prefs.js file. Opened the file in editor. Found lines with extensions.lastAppVersion and extensions.lastPlatformVersion, and "downgraded" thunderbird version in them (changed 45.7.1 to 45.7.0). Removed line with extensions.installedDistroAddon.{e2fda1a4-762b-4020-b5ad-a41df1933103} in it. Restarted thunderbird. And lightning was back. Not sure if the above steps are sufficient. Perhaps something in what I described as 'mucking' was required too. -- Andriy Gapon From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Mon Mar 6 23:56:12 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A6B9D00743 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 23:56:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A2C51B41 for ; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 23:56:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 14887D00741; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 23:56:12 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 122ABD0073F; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 23:56:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD66D1B3E; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 23:56:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1235) id 2A81F2ADC; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 23:56:11 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 00:56:10 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: arch@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: manpath change for ports ? Message-ID: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="hswr2nlkza6kbeck" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170225 (1.8.0) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Mar 2017 23:56:12 -0000 --hswr2nlkza6kbeck Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Hi all, I would like to propose a change in the localbase hier for ports I think we should add /usr/local/share/man in the manpath along with at first and maybe instead of in long term. The reason is: - /usr/local/share/man seems more consistent to me with base which have: /usr/share/man - It will remove lots of patches from the ports tree where were we need to patch upstream build system to install in a non usual path. My proposal is to add to the manpath /usr/local/share/man in default man(1) command in FreeBSD 12 (MFCed to 11-STABLE) and either provide an errata for 11.0/10.3 or a /usr/local/etc/man.d/something.conf via a port or something like that for those two, what do you think? For the same reason I would like to allow porters to stop patching (with pathfix or anything else) the path for pkgconfig files and allow /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig along with the current /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig:/usr/libdata/pkgconfig Which will also remove tons of hacks from the ports tree. What do you think? Best regards, Bapt --hswr2nlkza6kbeck Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEgOTj3suS2urGXVU3Y4mL3PG3PloFAli99xoACgkQY4mL3PG3 PlqnEA//Z2nKqYDqHrBdjs51JwZyHj/85AnUbScmpdYD18uikRydbVZ8gofaDQKb rDwfXNd2mfLBoYA/8tlvkKoEtUiWBb7b7Ge6pPhCREIZCneQqCPv3YmBuWpGZjtO oRmFKpX3visAHB4BuihKa9LmFY8ldFKAaLzjWVwk3oU4v0lFTgxTh2ympVP3jAGl iG9f8N8GAkHzbDHpc8Cojc8i3FR4zHk1/ThbMNi3JqUz7XiJPa91Pva7Fkc0rnKk nJ3EKwA/w9lLadRaNjLWIq3HzHIq7RfkugH+5hGUhL7D0AkaOMfpK2r26yr8iJ5S 0s9/0LnAfae+q82EbGOdqnNxMFmmkrzmKNkTnLzPJCRn5+xtH8QR5xoE2z9yUGvc Dnp3ASfPCMiH3Rrr9mXo/I1oxLMGnKXPw1fpsxAdbzZVIp5vJfMsS3CCvw6jKv+V OVH5CGDiJYw/491QgI4dC0iOM9fqsj51y28f9k9hxp6ZOM4a95FurqTjjLYvQTH2 VROkYbJpVXB2MbNSo+x6p23gWFvjD7MBT7J1d4mY9+zhb9F7n0KG80ULXifFaT3L 0g5tejeM46r1NlbQWCzIJvNEKO0jxbgmbZjD4BwpnY83vEKV1UAsX2EL9z0BeLBC T8dcLSKxYVsStlxLASkF4RhJc3WAmT9pDLrnHu6XW2XZgtJ1qvU= =plq2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --hswr2nlkza6kbeck-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Mar 7 00:16:58 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54590CFA0CD for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 00:16:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin.mato@orange.fr) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4090A189B for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 00:16:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin.mato@orange.fr) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 3D24DCFA0CC; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 00:16:58 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B225CFA0CA for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 00:16:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin.mato@orange.fr) Received: from smtp.smtpout.orange.fr (smtp02.smtpout.orange.fr [80.12.242.124]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "Bizanga Labs SMTP Client Certificate", Issuer "Bizanga Labs CA" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5A381898 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 00:16:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from martin.mato@orange.fr) Received: from wwinf1g10 ([10.232.37.53]) by mwinf5d25 with ME id soGn1u00W18o7y203oGnXC; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 01:16:47 +0100 X-ME-Helo: wwinf1g10 X-ME-Auth: bWFydGluLm1hdG9Ab3JhbmdlLmZy X-ME-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 01:16:47 +0100 X-ME-IP: 86.193.79.26 Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 01:16:47 +0100 (CET) From: Martin MATO Reply-To: Martin MATO To: ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1666557442.12084.1488845807827.JavaMail.www@wwinf1g10> Subject: re: FreeBSD Port: xf86-video-intel-2.99.917.20170228 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [86.193.79.26] X-WUM-FROM: |~| X-WUM-TO: |~| X-WUM-REPLYTO: |~| Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 00:16:58 -0000 =C2=A0Greetings =C2=A0 Just updated the port on my latitude D830 =C2=A0no crashes , no problems. running compiz-manager flawlessly also. =C2=A0=20 =C2=A0what is the errors shown in Xorg.0.log or the console output? =C2=A0=20 =C2=A0=20 =C2=A0=20 > Message du 06/03/17 21:10 > De : "Microsoft Roaming"=20 > A : "x11@FreeBSD.org"=20 > Copie =C3=A0 : "ports@FreeBSD.org"=20 > Objet : FreeBSD Port: xf86-video-intel-2.99.917.20170228 >=20 > Hello, >=20 > Please U R G E N T L Y mark this port as broken or roll back to the revis= ion r433863 >=20 > Invoking =E2=80=98X=E2=80=99 now causes crashes. Even when I force deacti= vation of any acceleration in the xorg.conf, it crashes. The sole solution = is to use the sfcb or vesa driver, it crashes also with driver modesetting >=20 > So I suspect it could be an issue related to KMS >=20 > I rolled back to r433863 and it works back >=20 > NOTE : tested on an old HP laptop 2530p >=20 > Best Regards, >=20 > David >=20 >=20 >=20 > Provenance : Courrier pour Windows 10 >=20 > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-x11@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-x11-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Mar 7 00:40:50 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37933CFA579 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 00:40:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alfred@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2749D11FE for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 00:40:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alfred@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 20AF3CFA577; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 00:40:50 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 200B5CFA575; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 00:40:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alfred@freebsd.org) Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13EDA11FC; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 00:40:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alfred@freebsd.org) Received: from Alfreds-MacBook-Pro-2.local (unknown [IPv6:2601:645:8003:a4d6:ecc4:d340:2398:8f07]) by elvis.mu.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CDD13346DDDC; Mon, 6 Mar 2017 16:40:39 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: manpath change for ports ? To: Baptiste Daroussin , arch@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org References: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> From: Alfred Perlstein Organization: FreeBSD Message-ID: <4a120d69-9934-3157-7e31-f9f2992982a7@freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 6 Mar 2017 16:40:39 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 00:40:50 -0000 On 3/6/17 3:56 PM, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to propose a change in the localbase hier for ports > > I think we should add /usr/local/share/man in the manpath along with at first > and maybe instead of in long term. > > The reason is: > - /usr/local/share/man seems more consistent to me with base which have: > /usr/share/man > - It will remove lots of patches from the ports tree where were we need to patch > upstream build system to install in a non usual path. > > My proposal is to add to the manpath /usr/local/share/man in default man(1) > command in FreeBSD 12 (MFCed to 11-STABLE) > > and either provide an errata for 11.0/10.3 or a > /usr/local/etc/man.d/something.conf via a port or something like that for those > two, what do you think? > > For the same reason I would like to allow porters to stop patching (with pathfix > or anything else) the path for pkgconfig files and allow > /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig along with the current > /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig:/usr/libdata/pkgconfig > > Which will also remove tons of hacks from the ports tree. > > What do you think? > > Best regards, > Bapt Yes please. Reducing the required changes to port software to FreeBSD is a good thing. -Alfred From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Mar 7 04:42:29 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F75AD01F86 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 04:42:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ish@amail.plala.or.jp) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0130139F for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 04:42:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ish@amail.plala.or.jp) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id EF722D01F84; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 04:42:28 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEFBAD01F83; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 04:42:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ish@amail.plala.or.jp) Received: from msa01b.plala.or.jp (msa01.plala.or.jp [58.93.240.1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 590E3139C; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 04:42:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ish@amail.plala.or.jp) Received: from msc01.plala.or.jp ([172.23.12.31]) by msa01b.plala.or.jp with ESMTP id <20170307044214.KLZX22821.msa01b.plala.or.jp@msc01.plala.or.jp>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 13:42:14 +0900 Received: from localhost ([2400:7800:4d3a:6100:5e51:4fff:fe11:73f3]) by msc01.plala.or.jp with ESMTP id <20170307044213.DDSG15946.msc01.plala.or.jp@localhost>; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 13:42:13 +0900 Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 13:42:02 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20170307.134202.1638391944167935510.ish@amail.plala.or.jp> To: martin.mato@orange.fr Cc: ports@freebsd.org, x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: xf86-video-intel-2.99.917.20170228 From: Masachika ISHIZUKA In-Reply-To: <1666557442.12084.1488845807827.JavaMail.www@wwinf1g10> References: <1666557442.12084.1488845807827.JavaMail.www@wwinf1g10> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.7 on Emacs 24.5 / Mule 6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-VirusScan: Outbound; msa01m; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 13:42:15 +0900 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 04:42:29 -0000 My Dell XPS12 (9Q33, Corei7-4500U, haswell) is working well with xf86-video-intel-2.99.917.20170228 (sna) without kld_list="i915kms". Issue for both r435512(2.99.917.20170228) and r433863(2.99.917.20170103) is not showing any windows after resuming blanking screen. Workaround is that the switching console (ctl-alt-F1) and reswitching x11 (clt-alt-F9). It's shown windows again. -- Masachika ISHIZUKA From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Mar 7 06:29:20 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D2C0CD0177D for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 06:29:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4BF81D1C for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 06:29:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id BEF3AD0177B; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 06:29:20 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE2E3D01779; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 06:29:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A221B1D1A; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 06:29:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1354) id EFD452844; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 06:29:19 +0000 (UTC) To: bapt@freebsd.org Subject: Re: manpath change for ports ? Cc: arch@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> Message-Id: <20170307062919.EFD452844@freefall.freebsd.org> Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 06:29:19 +0000 (UTC) From: jbeich@freebsd.org (Jan Beich) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 06:29:20 -0000 Baptiste Daroussin writes: > Hi all, > > I would like to propose a change in the localbase hier for ports > > I think we should add /usr/local/share/man in the manpath along with at first > and maybe instead of in long term. > > The reason is: > - /usr/local/share/man seems more consistent to me with base which have: > /usr/share/man > - It will remove lots of patches from the ports tree where were we need to patch > upstream build system to install in a non usual path. Can you also move /usr/local/info to /usr/local/share/info? texinfo is gone since 11.0-RELEASE (or r276551) but hier(7) and BSD.usr.dist still try to encroach on GNU defaults. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Mar 7 07:27:06 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 951D8CFB933 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 07:27:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 829E51CE2 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 07:27:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 7CEC0CFB930; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 07:27:06 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C1D7CFB92E; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 07:27:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B3E81CE0; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 07:27:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1235) id A3D0832D1; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 07:27:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 08:27:05 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Jan Beich Cc: ports@freebsd.org, arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: manpath change for ports ? Message-ID: <20170307072705.e55oy62lt7px32ks@ivaldir.net> References: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> <20170307062919.EFD452844@freefall.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="u6vhgw3l56jnm36d" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170307062919.EFD452844@freefall.freebsd.org> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170225 (1.8.0) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 07:27:06 -0000 --u6vhgw3l56jnm36d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 06:29:19AM +0000, Jan Beich wrote: > Baptiste Daroussin writes: >=20 > > Hi all, > > > > I would like to propose a change in the localbase hier for ports > > > > I think we should add /usr/local/share/man in the manpath along with at= first > > and maybe instead of in long term. > > > > The reason is: > > - /usr/local/share/man seems more consistent to me with base which have: > > /usr/share/man > > - It will remove lots of patches from the ports tree where were we need= to patch > > upstream build system to install in a non usual path. >=20 > Can you also move /usr/local/info to /usr/local/share/info? texinfo is > gone since 11.0-RELEASE (or r276551) but hier(7) and BSD.usr.dist still > try to encroach on GNU defaults. Yes would be a good one Best regards, Bapt --u6vhgw3l56jnm36d Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEgOTj3suS2urGXVU3Y4mL3PG3PloFAli+YLwACgkQY4mL3PG3 PloI/xAAzuxMcKie8hVTsCvjO2anwfzeVJSnDSOmJ3TP/Va/2Q7lpW9Y/11wSVGN dKCtNoPfW96Mh5xUuspxZ9p0vzjYGIU9EjHcykbnsEU88FpCYKGPR8dSzkco2O7m BXTpsTtlVdxsL5/EHV8TfOWdCPS1A1WLn5kQiequy4DsQ8KiJcHLjL5b3I//uMH0 hFUWSMsJK+Cn2snTTGr5XVhHbXxVjThyuuj8AF6LAwI+g38MgdZaxEMf571TeK1L /8xF/+oQEZo46xYtv6NrJ4Cs0wZO47+QUhGLkFN/lvNo3AWhXq39/qXo8ozPK78k 9phVjeYw1nArXDLOKlb6WNbp5RdEc94/ZWPFkw1qi/V4bE7m+N7Lf83yWsiCVk+q GQuhO+NU4ADCxhePMTwAa1CfAJ1yoEfVwK/pMllrPv8NLph4mmNcV5PUQRSLm3HK //uCXAwZMvaYvVnK/0VvH/bnomvuwLFS392ha3wx/iY611quFaXQ2Anrpa3JOP3r EV9n62QUvwY4geWAxw/fEo01WLFq7nyZZ3zbMgW9XpkoHfcDpDI93OMNQsCsfS/O rjYc3nVnJ3fVVfvpyv5kuqbKn3I8xs9IITtKQ503ithzopTJ/dzb8z+lfvpVh5y5 S8LoOuPQbYG5hVRu1QXNRKMfBMBjGwwghY/F+zvSKh/onmT0l/g= =oSCS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --u6vhgw3l56jnm36d-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Mar 7 08:04:34 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B143D01535 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 08:04:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77E881118 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 08:04:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 77591D01533; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 08:04:34 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 770B3D01532 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 08:04:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (portscout.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A6241117 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 08:04:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v2784Y54054262 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 08:04:34 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v2784YTt054259; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 08:04:34 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201703070804.v2784YTt054259@portscout.ysv.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.ysv.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 08:04:34 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 08:04:34 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ archivers/dpkg | 1.18.22 | 1.18.23 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ graphics/icoutils | 0.31.1 | 0.31.2 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ graphics/opencollada | 1.6.37 | v1.6.40 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Mar 7 12:40:45 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6BDBCFBB46 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 12:40:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 822FB14BF for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 12:40:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from desk.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E99A96B2; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 12:40:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by desk.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id DC7A04F03; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 13:40:44 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Walter Schwarzenfeld Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: archivers/libarchive fails to build References: <1488760591.113814.901321736.78067F18@webmail.messagingengine.com> <4b5e848e-d501-5237-8b1c-6d7308b5bec3@utanet.at> Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 13:40:44 +0100 In-Reply-To: <4b5e848e-d501-5237-8b1c-6d7308b5bec3@utanet.at> (Walter Schwarzenfeld's message of "Mon, 6 Mar 2017 01:39:44 +0100") Message-ID: <864lz5qmyb.fsf@desk.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 12:40:45 -0000 Walter Schwarzenfeld writes: > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D217244 > > (But if it will removend, half of the repo on the servers had to be > recompiled. Cause if lzmalib is installed other ports grap it, if the > needed or not). Poudriere builds each port in a clean environment which contains only those packages that the port explicitly requires, so that is not an issue. I am unable to reproduce the qt5-webkit issue that you mention in the PR on 10.3 or 11.0. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Mar 7 15:24:03 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E87F8D01252 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 15:24:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from db@db.net) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8E3D1848 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 15:24:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from db@db.net) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D5435D01250; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 15:24:03 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D48B3D0124D; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 15:24:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from db@db.net) Received: from diana.db.net (diana.db.net [66.113.102.10]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1B411844; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 15:24:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from db@db.net) Received: from night.db.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by diana.db.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64CC62AA442; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 08:22:53 -0700 (MST) Received: by night.db.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7B1163981A; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 10:24:00 -0500 (EST) Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 10:24:00 -0500 From: Diane Bruce To: Jan Beich Cc: bapt@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: manpath change for ports ? Message-ID: <20170307152400.GA14841@night.db.net> References: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> <20170307062919.EFD452844@freefall.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170307062919.EFD452844@freefall.freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 15:24:04 -0000 On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 06:29:19AM +0000, Jan Beich wrote: > Baptiste Daroussin writes: > > > Hi all, > > > > I would like to propose a change in the localbase hier for ports > > > > I think we should add /usr/local/share/man in the manpath along with at first > > and maybe instead of in long term. > > > > The reason is: > > - /usr/local/share/man seems more consistent to me with base which have: > > /usr/share/man > > - It will remove lots of patches from the ports tree where were we need to patch > > upstream build system to install in a non usual path. > > Can you also move /usr/local/info to /usr/local/share/info? texinfo is > gone since 11.0-RELEASE (or r276551) but hier(7) and BSD.usr.dist still > try to encroach on GNU defaults. A big yes from me for both of these proposals. -- - db@FreeBSD.org db@db.net http://www.db.net/~db From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Mar 7 15:51:16 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADE26D0109E for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 15:51:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vangyzen@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E43112F4 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 15:51:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vangyzen@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 98851D01098; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 15:51:16 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97D66D01094; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 15:51:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vangyzen@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.vangyzen.net (hotblack.vangyzen.net [IPv6:2607:fc50:1000:7400:216:3eff:fe72:314f]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8406512F1; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 15:51:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vangyzen@FreeBSD.org) Received: from sweettea.beer.town (unknown [76.164.8.130]) by smtp.vangyzen.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 906ED5646A; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 09:51:15 -0600 (CST) Subject: Re: manpath change for ports ? To: Baptiste Daroussin , arch@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org References: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> From: Eric van Gyzen Message-ID: Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 09:51:14 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 15:51:16 -0000 On 03/06/2017 17:56, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to propose a change in the localbase hier for ports [...] > Which will also remove tons of hacks from the ports tree. > > What do you think? This sounds good to me. I seem to recall that most(?) Linux distros used /usr/man many years ago, but they switched to /usr/share/man, I think in the early 2000s. If that's correct, then I consider our /usr/local/man path a historical curiosity that should finally be changed to /usr/local/share/man. Eric From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Mar 7 16:19:30 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32A9BD01F21 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 16:19:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markmi@dsl-only.net) Received: from asp.reflexion.net (outbound-mail-211-202.reflexion.net [208.70.211.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BE32D1A38 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 16:19:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from markmi@dsl-only.net) Received: (qmail 17945 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2017 16:19:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail-cs-02.app.dca.reflexion.local) (10.81.19.2) by 0 (rfx-qmail) with SMTP; 7 Mar 2017 16:19:22 -0000 Received: by mail-cs-02.app.dca.reflexion.local (Reflexion email security v8.30.2) with SMTP; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 11:19:22 -0500 (EST) Received: (qmail 17767 invoked from network); 7 Mar 2017 16:19:22 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO iron2.pdx.net) (69.64.224.71) by 0 (rfx-qmail) with (AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 7 Mar 2017 16:19:22 -0000 Received: from [192.168.1.119] (c-67-170-167-181.hsd1.or.comcast.net [67.170.167.181]) by iron2.pdx.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 69B52EC80E9; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 08:19:21 -0800 (PST) From: Mark Millard Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\)) Subject: buzilla 214400: is is ports/head/base/binutils that is being reported on, freebsd-powerpc@FreeBSD.org assignee is wrong Message-Id: <991939AC-AABC-4A3F-8A13-123FA997C721@dsl-only.net> Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 08:19:20 -0800 Cc: FreeBSD PowerPC ML , FreeBSD Ports To: danfe@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 16:19:30 -0000 You (danfe at FreeBSD.org) updated bugzilla 214400 but. . . The notation base/binutils in the summary and possibly elsewhere seems to have confused things: This is about the port, not the base system files. So I've added ports/head/ before base/binutils in the Summary. I've also put back the port version number in the summary. But I can not fix the assignee: it should not be freebsd-powerpc@FreeBSD.org Can you put back the correct assignee for a port problem? === Mark Millard markmi at dsl-only.net From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Mar 7 16:31:35 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C3C2D0229B; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 16:31:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4E231115E; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 16:31:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 9FD204024; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 16:31:34 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 16:31:34 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Mark Millard Cc: FreeBSD PowerPC ML , FreeBSD Ports Subject: Re: buzilla 214400: is is ports/head/base/binutils that is being reported on, freebsd-powerpc@FreeBSD.org assignee is wrong Message-ID: <20170307163134.GA42397@FreeBSD.org> References: <991939AC-AABC-4A3F-8A13-123FA997C721@dsl-only.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <991939AC-AABC-4A3F-8A13-123FA997C721@dsl-only.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 16:31:35 -0000 On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 08:19:20AM -0800, Mark Millard wrote: > But I can not fix the assignee: it should not be freebsd-powerpc@FreeBSD.org > > Can you put back the correct assignee for a port problem? May I ask what exactly makes you think that freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org is correct assignee in this case? Perhaps it's not entirely accurate, but it's IMHO better than umbrella freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org. If you can think of more appropriate party, I'd be happy to reassign. ./danfe P.S. There's no need to rereply; it's already logged in the Bugzilla. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Mar 7 16:50:04 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BBF9D026F7 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 16:50:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B8391ABD for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 16:50:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 557EDD026F4; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 16:50:04 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54E97D026F2; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 16:50:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (static-24-113-41-81.wavecable.com [24.113.41.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A5ECF1ABA; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 16:50:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id v27GpuxG073029; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 08:52:02 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: arch@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org, Baptiste Daroussin In-Reply-To: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> References: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> From: "Chris H" Subject: Re: manpath change for ports ? Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 08:52:02 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: <2cb7a36f0b82d690e1b19d853fc1ca05@ultimatedns.net> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 16:50:04 -0000 On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 00:56:10 +0100 Baptiste Daroussin wrote > Hi all, > > I would like to propose a change in the localbase hier for ports > > I think we should add /usr/local/share/man in the manpath along with at first > and maybe instead of in long term. > > The reason is: > - /usr/local/share/man seems more consistent to me with base which have: > /usr/share/man > - It will remove lots of patches from the ports tree where were we need to > patch upstream build system to install in a non usual path. > > My proposal is to add to the manpath /usr/local/share/man in default man(1) > command in FreeBSD 12 (MFCed to 11-STABLE) > > and either provide an errata for 11.0/10.3 or a > /usr/local/etc/man.d/something.conf via a port or something like that for > those two, what do you think? > > For the same reason I would like to allow porters to stop patching (with > pathfix or anything else) the path for pkgconfig files and allow > /usr/local/lib/pkgconfig along with the current > /usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig:/usr/libdata/pkgconfig > > Which will also remove tons of hacks from the ports tree. > > What do you think? +1 please do. I can't think of any (good) reason not to. Thanks! --Chris > > Best regards, > Bapt From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Mar 7 17:05:22 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76BB3D02E65 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 17:05:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E8391F26 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 17:05:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 5AF7BD02E63; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 17:05:22 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A7D3D02E61; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 17:05:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: from mailrelay103.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay103.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.20.130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "relay.skynet.be", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 381891F22; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 17:05:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2CHJgDv5r5Y/0nD8VFdHAEBBAEBCgEBg?= =?us-ascii?q?1FBEIEIEo5ekFgpAZcagmyDMAQCAoIlRRMBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUWAQU6HCMQCxg?= =?us-ascii?q?JJQ8qHgYTigOyNYp7AQEBAQEFAQEBASSLPYo5BZwwkip2kDaTOzcggQM3LAiHF?= =?us-ascii?q?D81ihMBAQE?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2CHJgDv5r5Y/0nD8VFdHAEBBAEBCgEBg1FBEIEIEo5ekFg?= =?us-ascii?q?pAZcagmyDMAQCAoIlRRMBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUWAQU6HCMQCxgJJQ8qHgYTigOyN?= =?us-ascii?q?Yp7AQEBAQEFAQEBASSLPYo5BZwwkip2kDaTOzcggQM3LAiHFD81ihMBAQE?= Received: from 73.195-241-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([81.241.195.73]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 07 Mar 2017 18:04:06 +0100 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v27H44b0018269; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 18:04:05 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 18:04:04 +0100 From: Tijl Coosemans To: Eric van Gyzen Cc: Baptiste Daroussin , arch@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: manpath change for ports ? Message-ID: <20170307180404.284165de@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 17:05:22 -0000 On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 09:51:14 -0600 Eric van Gyzen wrote: > On 03/06/2017 17:56, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >> I would like to propose a change in the localbase hier for ports > > [...] > >> Which will also remove tons of hacks from the ports tree. >> >> What do you think? > > This sounds good to me. > > I seem to recall that most(?) Linux distros used /usr/man many years > ago, but they switched to /usr/share/man, I think in the early 2000s. > If that's correct, then I consider our /usr/local/man path a historical > curiosity that should finally be changed to /usr/local/share/man. Yes, we used PREFIX/man because that's what software developed for Linux used at the time. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Mar 7 17:33:27 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EF56D0196F for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 17:33:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dch@skunkwerks.at) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 67FDE1622 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 17:33:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dch@skunkwerks.at) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED322208D5 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 12:33:25 -0500 (EST) Received: from web6 ([10.202.2.216]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 07 Mar 2017 12:33:25 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=skunkwerks.at; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= mesmtp; bh=L1QywAeSTCqwX92tExbZyP8OTZk=; b=go0abrv8Ox+peTl9MT7lp 1xF26VjYzFnxf0sWwn/ElF1Rd+sP+o43+g9l4ymd60lEU+LsbQIWuMxKi73sDN1l rB8jPbBPt/Zlu3km7jKr4pm+WqWDIKCjzZjgYt4Ruopsf8G0/j5b+4DVKuRB5hAW s3IP974zorcCyT6JkRZJA8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:message-id:mime-version:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=L1QywAeSTCqwX92tExbZyP8OT Zk=; b=KmlB1nG6JOpLZQKNLFy+z/uzTgFnzHr8WhkT3yNgL3zRjzPTaNAsA644B cSK3yjGeUDQLk5pX68vzeFkFSkkGo51pGgUUUx/aOx0+ntCEf8mksMOfITqLgnuY Y3jODRHLVB5h53txXpY89LxBfEYbPpapDlrzZi0xxxS4ShrOWE= X-ME-Sender: Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 99) id D0D4348006; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 12:33:25 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <1488908005.887822.903505648.60E23A33@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: Dave Cottlehuber To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-9f47d516 Subject: new port needs committer -- sysutils/lava - apache couchdb view heater & databases/p5-Store-CouchDB Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 18:33:25 +0100 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 17:33:27 -0000 hi all, This very simple (and therefore hopefully error-free on my part :D) port from December would like a committer: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215508 It ensures that all couchdb indexes (views) are kept up to date, even if not directly used by the application. I also added a new perl-based port for Store::CouchDB yesterday, which as my first perl port may not be as error free as sysutils/lava, but feedback would be welcome. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217597 A+ Dave From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Mar 7 18:02:28 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94D7BD023D7 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 18:02:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5A04F1AE5 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 18:02:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1clJRN-000LX9-Vc; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 19:02:29 +0100 Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 19:02:29 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Dave Cottlehuber Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new port needs committer -- sysutils/lava - apache couchdb view heater & databases/p5-Store-CouchDB Message-ID: <20170307180229.GT13006@home.opsec.eu> References: <1488908005.887822.903505648.60E23A33@webmail.messagingengine.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1488908005.887822.903505648.60E23A33@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 18:02:28 -0000 Hi! > This very simple (and therefore hopefully error-free on my part :D) port > from December would like a committer: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215508 Done. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 3 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Mar 7 18:27:05 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82D8ED02DF8 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 18:27:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from garga.bsd@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60C6E1EC5 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 18:27:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from garga.bsd@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 5A53DD02DF6; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 18:27:05 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59A89D02DF4; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 18:27:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from garga.bsd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qk0-x243.google.com (mail-qk0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1355E1EC3; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 18:27:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from garga.bsd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qk0-x243.google.com with SMTP id j127so3345795qke.0; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 10:27:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+ytcUikyxkkeRF9gPDUVIPaBBXhRqn3m+p1I92OpzSw=; b=UXCVnJG4HNHiNezRJmHqlnP05DfGOQFfHbz2613MBkZKy+2g68ebA9bgDrteeywf3o XxV6PwIEtIvtGmP6auWM+/l9/Uhhm6WeED1E1fRL106Nh8qDAEQLjhpGLChHSpZaHwom HBE1CJxiK5huYUTEOlIaqVOS1LOENH8jP9B5gAvS/KvHuT8XssS48lb1ZzHKz/2RAACf Ihxvcg2khOjzkjxyH9z6YXKiWyfG4u6gsqZnCoLz+a0FbzURBlcK5WbHJrI25YlzbdW1 ou93Sq+URAz8MoehlVaP9zoHs+epXavzDd3erBoVNcRaf2EhJiCAPlOOUTyUhGDZc41R Xo8A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:cc:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=+ytcUikyxkkeRF9gPDUVIPaBBXhRqn3m+p1I92OpzSw=; b=LgjiMtQagPYO2LWHOMY79gil1m+4fCUNthr2lX02kBCHt4t1j+3N2etsFc/71IDnfa RpcAbRyeYG24DDut1dRxJtbToCMQj3Cj699jk1xcORvRcXSgTjt9/IevmH4sQJUCZkXt dLFlJTDFKJWNMA0VBJBXsRtgj3M7lnpJg6blJU4G9ym4IfYoFL1kT+FRkBuvqc8c6eeZ y9wx/C3z6381HOqVzOxkCXC8k2dEk0aLsUEqOCCTaMCWl/pPigoNmdmljAUirq/u5vBB jxpnUxkWQS5or/AS/NbmXKRuUaudF1lkfJl/oHnntiCQFeCm/ZUiZFE+wcYQebD3aEEP 4U7w== X-Gm-Message-State: AFeK/H3OCNfXzwwbBZoZ6nVBxO+H4IV2dthUkcDwn9D4m3A7ydodSuPfv4S1YtFB0G9IxA== X-Received: by 10.55.170.68 with SMTP id t65mr2033987qke.303.1488911224049; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 10:27:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from mbp-eth.home ([177.53.86.172]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id t12sm518648qke.9.2017.03.07.10.27.01 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 07 Mar 2017 10:27:03 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: manpath change for ports ? To: Diane Bruce , Jan Beich References: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> <20170307062919.EFD452844@freefall.freebsd.org> <20170307152400.GA14841@night.db.net> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, arch@freebsd.org, bapt@freebsd.org From: Renato Botelho Message-ID: <7452d2d1-6481-c700-045b-4c2fd8ff84d4@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 15:26:59 -0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170307152400.GA14841@night.db.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 18:27:05 -0000 On 07/03/17 12:24, Diane Bruce wrote: > On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 06:29:19AM +0000, Jan Beich wrote: >> Baptiste Daroussin writes: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> I would like to propose a change in the localbase hier for ports >>> >>> I think we should add /usr/local/share/man in the manpath along with at first >>> and maybe instead of in long term. >>> >>> The reason is: >>> - /usr/local/share/man seems more consistent to me with base which have: >>> /usr/share/man >>> - It will remove lots of patches from the ports tree where were we need to patch >>> upstream build system to install in a non usual path. >> Can you also move /usr/local/info to /usr/local/share/info? texinfo is >> gone since 11.0-RELEASE (or r276551) but hier(7) and BSD.usr.dist still >> try to encroach on GNU defaults. > A big yes from me for both of these proposals. > +1 -- Renato Botelho From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Tue Mar 7 18:31:35 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61BA6D0010F for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 18:31:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2717E17E6 for ; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 18:31:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1clJtZ-000LaL-Ku; Tue, 07 Mar 2017 19:31:37 +0100 Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 19:31:37 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Dave Cottlehuber Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: new port needs committer -- sysutils/lava - apache couchdb view heater & databases/p5-Store-CouchDB Message-ID: <20170307183137.GV13006@home.opsec.eu> References: <1488908005.887822.903505648.60E23A33@webmail.messagingengine.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1488908005.887822.903505648.60E23A33@webmail.messagingengine.com> X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Mar 2017 18:31:35 -0000 Hi! > I also added a new perl-based port for Store::CouchDB yesterday, which > as my first perl port may not be as error free as sysutils/lava, but > feedback would be welcome. > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217597 Done. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 3 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 8 00:46:49 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C0ECCFA046; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 00:46:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [192.108.105.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.soaustin.net", Issuer "StartCom Class 2 IV Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 118AB18AB; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 00:46:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from lonesome.com (bones.soaustin.net [192.108.105.22]) by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 76699BA8; Tue, 7 Mar 2017 18:46:36 -0600 (CST) Date: Tue, 7 Mar 2017 18:46:35 -0600 From: Mark Linimon To: Alexey Dokuchaev Cc: Mark Millard , FreeBSD Ports , FreeBSD PowerPC ML Subject: Re: buzilla 214400: is is ports/head/base/binutils that is being reported on, freebsd-powerpc@FreeBSD.org assignee is wrong Message-ID: <20170308004635.GA13633@lonesome.com> References: <991939AC-AABC-4A3F-8A13-123FA997C721@dsl-only.net> <20170307163134.GA42397@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170307163134.GA42397@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 00:46:49 -0000 On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 04:31:34PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > May I ask what exactly makes you think that freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org > is correct assignee in this case? I'm away from my systems right now but I do know that this problem also affects sparc64. The original assignments of those 3 PRs were correct. mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 8 07:36:38 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 18714D025F0 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 07:36:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0592F1683 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 07:36:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 04FF2D025ED; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 07:36:38 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04B36D025EC for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 07:36:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (portscout.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC35D1682 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 07:36:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v287abxi000526 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 07:36:37 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v287ab3Y000525; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 07:36:37 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201703080736.v287ab3Y000525@portscout.ysv.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.ysv.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 07:36:37 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 07:36:38 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ graphics/opencollada | 1.6.37 | v1.6.41 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ multimedia/obs-studio | 17.0.2 | 18.0.1 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 8 08:24:25 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E826D00D04 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 08:24:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D172199E for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 08:24:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v288OPQa020524 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 08:24:25 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 217489] trafshow(1) man page on website is from old net/trafshow3 port Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 08:24:25 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Documentation X-Bugzilla-Component: Documentation X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: wosch@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 08:24:25 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D217489 Wolfram Schneider changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 8 12:09:14 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FADFD00890 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 12:09:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E65A130A for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 12:09:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 4DBC5D0088F; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 12:09:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D632D0088E for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 12:09:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:6601]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2919F1308 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 12:09:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.2]) by portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v28C9EgD002845 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 12:09:14 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild@portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org) Received: (from indexbuild@localhost) by portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v28C9E9o002844 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 12:09:14 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild) Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 12:09:14 GMT From: Ports Index build Message-Id: <201703081209.v28C9E9o002844@portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX build failed for 10.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 12:09:14 -0000 INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-10 - please wait..--- describe.accessibility --- --- describe.arabic --- --- describe.archivers --- --- describe.astro --- --- describe.audio --- --- describe.benchmarks --- --- describe.biology --- --- describe.cad --- --- describe.chinese --- --- describe.comms --- --- describe.converters --- --- describe.databases --- --- describe.deskutils --- --- describe.devel --- --- describe.dns --- --- describe.editors --- --- describe.emulators --- --- describe.finance --- --- describe.french --- --- describe.ftp --- [...] --- describe.print --- --- describe.russian --- --- describe.science --- --- describe.security --- --- describe.shells --- --- describe.sysutils --- --- describe.textproc --- --- describe.ukrainian --- --- describe.vietnamese --- --- describe.www --- --- describe.x11 --- --- describe.x11-clocks --- --- describe.x11-drivers --- --- describe.x11-fm --- --- describe.x11-fonts --- --- describe.x11-servers --- --- describe.x11-themes --- --- describe.x11-toolkits --- --- describe.x11-wm --- Done. make_index: /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/net/py-eventlet: no entry for /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/devel/py-enum-compat Committers on the hook: amdmi3 gahr kmoore lme mmokhi olivier robak Most recent SVN update was: Updating '.': U net-mgmt/Makefile A net-mgmt/icingaweb2-module-director A net-mgmt/icingaweb2-module-director/Makefile A net-mgmt/icingaweb2-module-director/distinfo A net-mgmt/icingaweb2-module-director/pkg-plist A net-mgmt/icingaweb2-module-businessprocess A net-mgmt/icingaweb2-module-businessprocess/Makefile A net-mgmt/icingaweb2-module-businessprocess/distinfo A net-mgmt/icingaweb2-module-businessprocess/pkg-plist A net-mgmt/icingaweb2-module-cube A net-mgmt/icingaweb2-module-cube/Makefile A net-mgmt/icingaweb2-module-cube/distinfo A net-mgmt/icingaweb2-module-cube/pkg-descr A net-mgmt/icingaweb2-module-cube/pkg-plist A net-mgmt/icingaweb2-module-generictts A net-mgmt/icingaweb2-module-generictts/Makefile A net-mgmt/icingaweb2-module-generictts/distinfo A net-mgmt/icingaweb2-module-generictts/pkg-descr A net-mgmt/icingaweb2-module-generictts/pkg-plist U sysutils/Makefile A sysutils/sysadm A sysutils/sysadm/Makefile A sysutils/sysadm/distinfo A sysutils/sysadm/pkg-descr A sysutils/sysadm/pkg-plist U net/py-eventlet/Makefile U net/py-eventlet/distinfo U net/librdkafka/Makefile U net/librdkafka/distinfo U dns/opendnssec2/Makefile U dns/opendnssec2/distinfo U dns/opendnssec2/pkg-plist U devel/git-lfs/Makefile U devel/git-lfs/distinfo U devel/fossil/Makefile U emulators/m2000/Makefile U emulators/m2000/files/patch-Makefile.X U emulators/m2000/files/patch-X.c Updated to revision 435676. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 8 15:12:29 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 399BFD0288F for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 15:12:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 287E4B3B for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 15:12:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 27CBAD0288E; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 15:12:29 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27694D0288D for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 15:12:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:6601]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02766B3A for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 15:12:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.2]) by portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v28FCSqN098690 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 15:12:28 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild@portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org) Received: (from indexbuild@localhost) by portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v28FCSoB098687 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 15:12:28 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild) Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 15:12:28 GMT From: Ports Index build Message-Id: <201703081512.v28FCSoB098687@portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX now builds successfully on 10.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 15:12:29 -0000 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 8 15:39:51 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADEBAD03147 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 15:39:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D38F11CF for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 15:39:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 97370D03145; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 15:39:51 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96A72D03143; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 15:39:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 617B111CD; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 15:39:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from desk.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id EF59A10B68; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 15:39:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: by desk.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 120637022; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:39:50 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Baptiste Daroussin Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: manpath change for ports ? References: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 16:39:50 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> (Baptiste Daroussin's message of "Tue, 7 Mar 2017 00:56:10 +0100") Message-ID: <86mvcvojzt.fsf@desk.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 15:39:51 -0000 Baptiste Daroussin writes: > I would like to propose a change in the localbase hier for ports > > I think we should add /usr/local/share/man in the manpath along with > at first and maybe instead of in long term. 2) plus info -> share/info as suggested by jbeich 3) plus libdata/pkgconfig -> lib/pkgconfig These three items will ensure that "./configure --prefix=3D/usr/local && make install" will do the right thing out of the box - by changing our definition of "the right thing" to match what the GNU autotools have been doing for at least 15 years. 4) Remove the hardcoded library path in lang/gcc* This makes it possible to work on software that includes both libraries and programs while an earlier copy of the same software is already installed. With the current state of gcc, the programs you are working on will be linked against the version of the library that's already installed instead of the version you just compiled, and there is nothing you can do to prevent it. You won't notice anything if all you ever do is "make && make install", because the new library will replace the old, but if you try to run your program directly from the build tree, it will use the wrong library. This can be incredibly frustrating if you're not aware of it - imagine you're trying to fix a bug in that library and no matter what you do, your regression test keeps failing... DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 8 16:04:23 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 090D5D03EA4 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:04:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@immure.com) Received: from maul.immure.com (108-84-10-9.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.84.10.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DECE8C88 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:04:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com ([10.1.132.9]) by maul.immure.com with esmtp (Exim 4.88 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1cle4a-000JU4-NI for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 10:04:21 -0600 Received: from rancor.immure.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v28G4KhY017650 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 10:04:20 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: (from bob@localhost) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.14.9/Submit) id v28G4K78017649 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 10:04:20 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from bob) Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 10:04:20 -0600 From: Bob Willcox To: ports list Subject: Best way to cause synth to ignore rebuilding of a port?? Message-ID: <20170308160420.GG22199@rancor.immure.com> Reply-To: Bob Willcox MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 16:04:23 -0000 What is the best way to get synth to simply ignore certain ports when running the upgrade-system command with it? I would like for it to not upgrade firefox (don't want to lose my tab groups) so I'd rather that it not even consider updating firefox again, at least not till some form of tab groups are again supported. Note that I haven't tried ver 52 of firefox, but from what I've read it sounds like all plugins/addons other than flash are no longer supported. Thanks, Bob -- Bob Willcox | If a program is useful, it will be changed. bob@immure.com | Austin, TX | From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 8 16:19:53 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A5C9D031E0 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:19:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49CAB14C4 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:19:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 4410DD031DC; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:19:53 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4348CD031DA; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:19:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "vps1.elischer.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BFF9114B9; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:19:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from Julian-MBP3.local (106-68-109-205.dyn.iinet.net.au [106.68.109.205]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id v28GJiRW064072 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 8 Mar 2017 08:19:47 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Subject: Re: manpath change for ports ? To: =?UTF-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=c3=b8rgrav?= , Baptiste Daroussin References: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> <86mvcvojzt.fsf@desk.des.no> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, arch@FreeBSD.org From: Julian Elischer Message-ID: <1414f265-7a3c-e2ea-06ac-7b7343347f93@freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 00:19:38 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <86mvcvojzt.fsf@desk.des.no> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 16:19:53 -0000 On 8/3/17 11:39 pm, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Baptiste Daroussin writes: >> I would like to propose a change in the localbase hier for ports >> >> I think we should add /usr/local/share/man in the manpath along with >> at first and maybe instead of in long term. > 2) plus info -> share/info as suggested by jbeich > > 3) plus libdata/pkgconfig -> lib/pkgconfig > > These three items will ensure that "./configure --prefix=/usr/local && > make install" will do the right thing out of the box - by changing our > definition of "the right thing" to match what the GNU autotools have > been doing for at least 15 years. > > 4) Remove the hardcoded library path in lang/gcc* > > This makes it possible to work on software that includes both libraries > and programs while an earlier copy of the same software is already > installed. With the current state of gcc, the programs you are working > on will be linked against the version of the library that's already > installed instead of the version you just compiled, and there is nothing unless you use --sysroot=... > you can do to prevent it. You won't notice anything if all you ever do > is "make && make install", because the new library will replace the old, > but if you try to run your program directly from the build tree, it will > use the wrong library. This can be incredibly frustrating if you're not > aware of it - imagine you're trying to fix a bug in that library and no > matter what you do, your regression test keeps failing... > > DES From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 8 16:21:11 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC57DD03326 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:21:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 92ED417F2 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:21:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from [88.217.107.178] (helo=localhost.unixarea.de) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cleKr-0004d1-F8 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 17:21:09 +0100 Received: from localhost.my.domain (c720-r292778-amd64 [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.unixarea.de (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPS id v28GL8HC004380 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 17:21:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.15.2/8.14.9/Submit) id v28GL8ie004379 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 17:21:08 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 17:21:08 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: poudriere && stopping / pausing execution of builders Message-ID: <20170308162108.GA4339@c720-r292778-amd64> Reply-To: Matthias Apitz Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT r292778 (amd64) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 88.217.107.178 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 16:21:11 -0000 Hello, Using poudriere, what I'm always missing are two features: - halting the builders, i.e. they should not pick-up new jobs, just finish the current job; - the 2nd one is more at OS level: in GOT(*) computers like the /360 have had a red button to pause all execution, (look into registers, modify, etc,) and resume the execution again at the point of interrupt; do we have this in FreeBSD? Do you need a use case for the 2nd missing feature? Thx matthias GOT(*): Good Old Times -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ guru@unixarea.de, ⌂ http://www.unixarea.de/ ☎ +49-176-38902045 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 8 16:35:05 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F908D037B9 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:35:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [81.2.117.100]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B91FD12B for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:35:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from zero-gravitas.local (unknown [85.199.232.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 126517D6C for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:34:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/126517D6C; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral Subject: Re: Best way to cause synth to ignore rebuilding of a port?? To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20170308160420.GG22199@rancor.immure.com> From: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:34:45 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170308160420.GG22199@rancor.immure.com> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="pmOrpeJMvvBfX0dLF0aG9kfJW8uSEU5lm" X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL, RDNS_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 16:35:05 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --pmOrpeJMvvBfX0dLF0aG9kfJW8uSEU5lm Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="RVar8emG9893VQ1qAQgplcIgKqhbI9BS6"; protected-headers="v1" From: Matthew Seaman To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: Best way to cause synth to ignore rebuilding of a port?? References: <20170308160420.GG22199@rancor.immure.com> In-Reply-To: <20170308160420.GG22199@rancor.immure.com> --RVar8emG9893VQ1qAQgplcIgKqhbI9BS6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2017/03/08 16:04, Bob Willcox wrote: > Note that I haven't tried ver 52 of firefox, but from what I've read it= sounds > like all plugins/addons other than flash are no longer supported. Make that: all *NPAPI* plugins other than Flash are now unsupported. That's stuff like the Java plugin or the OpenH264 Video Codec from Cisco (which I seem to have installed and can no-longer remember why. Some sort of video conference thing a long time ago). Ordinary add-ons like AddBlock-Plus or NoScript don't use NPAPI and so are not affected by this move. I've been on version 52 on my Mac desktop for a while with no noticeable problems (well, none beyond what you normally got with FF in earlier versions.) Cheers, Matthew --RVar8emG9893VQ1qAQgplcIgKqhbI9BS6-- --pmOrpeJMvvBfX0dLF0aG9kfJW8uSEU5lm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJYwDKsXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQxOUYxNTRFQ0JGMTEyRTUwNTQ0RTNGMzAw MDUxM0YxMEUwQTlFNEU3AAoJEABRPxDgqeTn0ugP/0kYaLHIeDbX1IhE4/tZyiWO gh8BJ9EPKbDLZ0jXSJhabj2Rd30TcSWHBShrRJHJpvK5TKsgmx3O8EDYtuZl+rN7 DLzhX8Y0keGvhm7LhSZGp9tVXYZGJmLH+foM9Y4jlIqOc3Qna/SmWaG7cX9kggol PhkU2FG6MPpXSPR7ArzL429LrQIYLF2kD5Q+LLqUNkMckIgKRyE75idud2kgdWv0 G23KY+D0SHO6tGI7nUIy44x4IRMIvw3m908ZApf6o814cPaoB3zPbYlBo77GZ9+j RU/1GH95z8jrkcPcvw1xVi5swlr0V+SZuVkIJMPCbZPAubFs+l6aIZQTAgf+u14t 7KHltamtcbVw1UEqIGzCEFEnCGQSB99TI2ndDFB/4tSB2bIlW7r2UPwGEmpFMAAo GyM9kI+NYLV5WziPI6POwKmJvfLk9cfB5T37Vajom/AtXXOMf3d92kPMz5/VnVrz kvCe23AQcGBNoCCLpGoqJGqu97pPT2oOvBiD7tkq94vJaWSiBtwQYuHQAX3xgct/ TIf9ixgs3TWCHFFGGP6rdsZ5qQAYHdvBOdhBxBN5H472mgN5sRHhPXcBZTrYUEBP XC4IW2adW93Zkcn7vx8HFhOSjDBWZsVkKZ/9UJDrCi40TwSTCadzyydRauX12TGX 7Gwze9kMKLjS8GZTCwha =cdej -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pmOrpeJMvvBfX0dLF0aG9kfJW8uSEU5lm-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 8 16:40:54 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A66D6D039BC; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:40:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (mail.soaustin.net [192.108.105.60]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.soaustin.net", Issuer "StartCom Class 2 IV Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 887C083D; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:40:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from lonesome.com (bones.soaustin.net [192.108.105.22]) by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EDCFF80; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 10:40:51 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 10:40:50 -0600 From: Mark Linimon To: rb@gid.co.uk Cc: Kurt Jaeger , FreeBSD CURRENT , FreeBSD ports , Chris H Subject: Re: How many versions of clang/llvm are currently required to maintain a system Message-ID: <20170308164050.GA16744@lonesome.com> References: <20170306071600.GA4150@lonesome.com> <20170306141633.GP13006@home.opsec.eu> <9442B4D5-FEAF-4BF1-9470-60897F97C13C@gid.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <9442B4D5-FEAF-4BF1-9470-60897F97C13C@gid.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 16:40:54 -0000 On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 03:00:23PM +0000, rb@gid.co.uk wrote: > Let me rephrase that: the link http://purelang.bitbucket.org/ > quoted on https://wiki.freebsd.org/ObsoleteLLVMVersions doesn’t work, That's the URL in lang/pure/Makefile. > should be https://bitbucket.org/purelang/ Hmm. I looked and it seems like https://purelang.bitbucket.io/ is a better choice? What do you think? mcl From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 8 16:41:04 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC13D039E6 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:41:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: from mail.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [217.69.76.211]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "0x20.net", Issuer "StartCom Class 1 DV Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2486991A; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:41:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (mail.0x20.net [IPv6:2001:aa8:fffb:1::3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.0x20.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B4446E0081; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 17:41:00 +0100 (CET) Received: from e-new.0x20.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id v28GexFV060473; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 17:40:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lars@e-new.0x20.net) Received: (from lars@localhost) by e-new.0x20.net (8.14.7/8.14.7/Submit) id v28Gexwe059274; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 17:40:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from lars) Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 17:40:59 +0100 From: Lars Engels To: Matthew Seaman Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best way to cause synth to ignore rebuilding of a port?? Message-ID: <20170308164059.GZ34495@e-new.0x20.net> References: <20170308160420.GG22199@rancor.immure.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="apg+fY3UKMMABzWO" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Editor: VIM - Vi IMproved 7.4 X-Operation-System: FreeBSD 8.4-RELEASE-p35 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 16:41:04 -0000 --apg+fY3UKMMABzWO Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 04:34:45PM +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote: > On 2017/03/08 16:04, Bob Willcox wrote: > > Note that I haven't tried ver 52 of firefox, but from what I've read it= sounds > > like all plugins/addons other than flash are no longer supported. >=20 > Make that: all *NPAPI* plugins other than Flash are now unsupported. > That's stuff like the Java plugin or the OpenH264 Video Codec from Cisco > (which I seem to have installed and can no-longer remember why. Some > sort of video conference thing a long time ago). The OpenH264 plugin is shipped out of the box. --apg+fY3UKMMABzWO Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJYwDQbXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ4RjQwMDE3RTRERjUzMTI1N0FGRTUxNDlF NTRDQjM3RDNBMDg5RDZEAAoJEOVMs306CJ1tR4UH/29jmw+WbdxVR8sL5yc0GAVw 8GBLdsw4GbaF2sReD+e77MDC20fEQYVkjgiKgDuIEP1CJOxoFi/PzukZ8lbasovd Iu7MffQY+vrA4tMWPdR+gRfNK87qLifnwR6iom53jXraU6TxLpWgpu4w7PiOP5gZ 26eH0365wno+kP1tMhh/otbiMEhuI+xBa/L5sWk4EEn18VQw7Sjt00bw2hIpo/dQ KTCyXflEoTLZ/pxzKz2sNQtM83w2YbFICd/P4vjYrlkr/0IcXICflpYXskWS1iU7 uf3hnT+pTCDqP+8hjoy83cxYIRBJA3lvWdblE9SbYg8s065XPQIrOKQHlwFpUVM= =JPLw -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --apg+fY3UKMMABzWO-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 8 16:41:20 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B6FAD03B4B for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:41:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69E04A8F for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:41:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 6942BD03B48; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:41:20 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68DA9D03B47; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:41:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30C5FA8D; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:41:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from desk.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id CC2DD10D55; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:41:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: by desk.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id E49E4702D; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 17:41:19 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Julian Elischer Cc: Baptiste Daroussin , ports@FreeBSD.org, arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: manpath change for ports ? References: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> <86mvcvojzt.fsf@desk.des.no> <1414f265-7a3c-e2ea-06ac-7b7343347f93@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 17:41:19 +0100 In-Reply-To: <1414f265-7a3c-e2ea-06ac-7b7343347f93@freebsd.org> (Julian Elischer's message of "Thu, 9 Mar 2017 00:19:38 +0800") Message-ID: <86bmtboh5c.fsf@desk.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 16:41:20 -0000 Julian Elischer writes: > Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav writes: > > This makes it possible to work on software that includes both > > libraries and programs while an earlier copy of the same software is > > already installed. With the current state of gcc, the programs you > > are working on will be linked against the version of the library > > that's already installed instead of the version you just compiled, > > and there is nothing > unless you use --sysroot=3D... Sure, if you have a copy of every single library your project depends on in your build tree. Is it really unreasonable to expect this to work out of the box? DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 8 16:51:22 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B83FCD0110F for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:51:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7EBF1A24 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:51:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v28GpMfQ095897 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:51:22 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 217489] trafshow(1) man page on website is from old net/trafshow3 port Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 16:51:22 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Documentation X-Bugzilla-Component: Documentation X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: linimon@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: Open X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: cc Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 16:51:22 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D217489 Mark Linimon changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org |freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD. | |org --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.= From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 8 17:23:14 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D18D0355A for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 17:23:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C07D010A3 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 17:23:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id BD0F6D03558; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 17:23:14 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC77BD03556; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 17:23:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: from mailrelay119.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay119.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.20.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "relay.skynet.be", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D800E10A0; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 17:23:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2BUFwBTPcBY/0nD8VFeHAEBBAEBCgEBg?= =?us-ascii?q?1FBEEFZg2CKf5BZKQGXG4JsgzYCgj9DFQECAQEBAQEBAWsohRYBBSMzIxALGAI?= =?us-ascii?q?CBSECAg8qHgYTigOwRYIminwBAQEBBgEBAQEkgQuKMoRUgwaCXwWcNo1DhGh2g?= =?us-ascii?q?SqPDZM+NSKBAzcsCIcUPzWKEwEBAQ?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2BUFwBTPcBY/0nD8VFeHAEBBAEBCgEBg1FBEEFZg2CKf5B?= =?us-ascii?q?ZKQGXG4JsgzYCgj9DFQECAQEBAQEBAWsohRYBBSMzIxALGAICBSECAg8qHgYTi?= =?us-ascii?q?gOwRYIminwBAQEBBgEBAQEkgQuKMoRUgwaCXwWcNo1DhGh2gSqPDZM+NSKBAzc?= =?us-ascii?q?sCIcUPzWKEwEBAQ?= Received: from 73.195-241-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([81.241.195.73]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 08 Mar 2017 18:21:26 +0100 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v28HLOPA079207; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 18:21:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 18:21:24 +0100 From: Tijl Coosemans To: Dag-Erling =?UTF-8?B?U23DuHJncmF2?= Cc: Baptiste Daroussin , ports@FreeBSD.org, arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: manpath change for ports ? Message-ID: <20170308182124.79c4bc13@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <86mvcvojzt.fsf@desk.des.no> References: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> <86mvcvojzt.fsf@desk.des.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 17:23:14 -0000 On Wed, 08 Mar 2017 16:39:50 +0100 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav wr= ote: > 4) Remove the hardcoded library path in lang/gcc* >=20 > This makes it possible to work on software that includes both libraries > and programs while an earlier copy of the same software is already > installed. With the current state of gcc, the programs you are working > on will be linked against the version of the library that's already > installed instead of the version you just compiled, and there is nothing > you can do to prevent it. You won't notice anything if all you ever do > is "make && make install", because the new library will replace the old, > but if you try to run your program directly from the build tree, it will > use the wrong library. This can be incredibly frustrating if you're not > aware of it - imagine you're trying to fix a bug in that library and no > matter what you do, your regression test keeps failing... Are you talking about gcc implicitly searching /usr/local/include and /usr/local/lib? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 8 17:31:33 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D80B0D03964 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 17:31:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B56F11930 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 17:31:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B4D03D03961; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 17:31:33 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B47CFD03960 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 17:31:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: from mail-it0-x232.google.com (mail-it0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7C45B192D for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 17:31:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wlosh@bsdimp.com) Received: by mail-it0-x232.google.com with SMTP id g138so43771123itb.0 for ; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 09:31:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eOvtHAB8Td0U8cliKspRxvVb35Z327+l2zv5OTs6gCo=; b=q07vS1J6nD9HvmU8+3kretio9bbHouEzqp97iNPibndPfyo3grCBcCDLwzpEKM4ROP 6pR/jj1OBeAy37eMgkafxYVRnBOrzyP7MPraEeFUfblINvBC2bp4qTo1S+FZZ626YCa1 Zi8zTzcbEgNpRcqiykpSLqKjKw7T/OVGqqVdN7WCKD3RDJ/FpgfxveB/p2C4xuLzOerJ OXq+IHA522CrkfBqZDLQHMQfSB4PYpwOqxd/T8ruCLFUQqJBlRWhLPDD6HevBT9pnKKI rHJVfalsMr0JpkuzMOrN3glZeS/zfRkKPab2t8/3K7/c01vTAtKrzUvvOAp7Ed7DLu3V 5RPg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=eOvtHAB8Td0U8cliKspRxvVb35Z327+l2zv5OTs6gCo=; b=EF3fdzCCcFroFKZ079kOHnomgGDVPQo0zgctR7VR4uV1dhljRIZYgxZQbugKuxsqd3 Jtcw1uhfpHZiBmf6RBJd823ydIOUnb2UUuFZpBPluBpkfnRfHLXeCuYIWfJ4rlO9WlSe LRv1N+ZD7vwLUl++e9n+AnySBpWicxz0QBncuZ1xobMFRK8lD5+y3fhvXUGk1I8riEmD jmAI0Tjdbx5qRA2pYYD+RSgBReNE53CPwjjq/eVEDVYJx99FpmXgmilhLOG3P3Bh0xpq q0+qI2LqNRoCKEn0E8QrIhKc+dDZbe7C3bs75HAYDIdAsCKI9KKVU2Bwi1qCAZ/N5+q/ S2nw== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39k0USRjaaCuvmRBXiVOBlU085NyOqqLB/uOF+9/5YUBMxXCd2czersbo+QrR8ElTMo/C9kPtNUyucDRfw== X-Received: by 10.36.116.71 with SMTP id o68mr8102427itc.60.1488994292677; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 09:31:32 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: wlosh@bsdimp.com Received: by 10.79.134.129 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 09:31:32 -0800 (PST) X-Originating-IP: [69.53.245.200] In-Reply-To: <20170308182124.79c4bc13@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> References: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> <86mvcvojzt.fsf@desk.des.no> <20170308182124.79c4bc13@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> From: Warner Losh Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 10:31:32 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: VLPcFSIUaPZ9K7h_6waLZszdytk Message-ID: Subject: Re: manpath change for ports ? To: Tijl Coosemans Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Dag=2DErling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= , ports@freebsd.org, "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" , Baptiste Daroussin Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 17:31:33 -0000 On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Wed, 08 Mar 2017 16:39:50 +0100 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav = wrote: >> 4) Remove the hardcoded library path in lang/gcc* >> >> This makes it possible to work on software that includes both libraries >> and programs while an earlier copy of the same software is already >> installed. With the current state of gcc, the programs you are working >> on will be linked against the version of the library that's already >> installed instead of the version you just compiled, and there is nothing >> you can do to prevent it. You won't notice anything if all you ever do >> is "make && make install", because the new library will replace the old, >> but if you try to run your program directly from the build tree, it will >> use the wrong library. This can be incredibly frustrating if you're not >> aware of it - imagine you're trying to fix a bug in that library and no >> matter what you do, your regression test keeps failing... > > Are you talking about gcc implicitly searching /usr/local/include and > /usr/local/lib? That's currently inconsistent between base gcc, clang, binutils and ports versions. I forget which ones do and which ones don't search automatically. IMHO, they all should. Warner From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 8 18:00:10 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07548D03574; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 18:00:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: from mx0.gid.co.uk (mx0.gid.co.uk [194.32.164.250]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A26918F6; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 18:00:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Received: from [194.32.164.15] ([194.32.164.15]) by mx0.gid.co.uk (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id v28Hxkn9077977; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 17:59:46 GMT (envelope-from rb@gid.co.uk) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\)) Subject: Re: How many versions of clang/llvm are currently required to maintain a system From: rb@gid.co.uk In-Reply-To: <20170308164050.GA16744@lonesome.com> Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 17:59:46 +0000 Cc: Kurt Jaeger , FreeBSD CURRENT , FreeBSD ports , Chris H Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <1EB4A1FD-F42E-4E15-A16D-932C0AC4A10D@gid.co.uk> References: <20170306071600.GA4150@lonesome.com> <20170306141633.GP13006@home.opsec.eu> <9442B4D5-FEAF-4BF1-9470-60897F97C13C@gid.co.uk> <20170308164050.GA16744@lonesome.com> To: Mark Linimon X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 18:00:10 -0000 Hi, > On 8 Mar 2017, at 16:40, Mark Linimon wrote: >=20 > On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 03:00:23PM +0000, rb@gid.co.uk wrote: >> Let me rephrase that: the link http://purelang.bitbucket.org/ >> quoted on https://wiki.freebsd.org/ObsoleteLLVMVersions doesn=E2=80=99t= work, >=20 > That's the URL in lang/pure/Makefile. >=20 >> should be https://bitbucket.org/purelang/ >=20 > Hmm. I looked and it seems like https://purelang.bitbucket.io/ is > a better choice? What do you think? Sure. > mcl >=20 -- Bob Bishop rb@gid.co.uk From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 8 18:15:18 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B22BD03D97; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 18:15:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from smtp206.alice.it (smtp206.alice.it [82.57.200.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E901F1661; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 18:15:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (82.52.25.226) by smtp206.alice.it (8.6.060.28) (authenticated as acanedi@alice.it) id 588F42770874E235; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 19:09:38 +0100 Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v28I9W6i046883; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 19:09:32 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.ventu: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be alamar.ventu Subject: Re: Thunderbird and UPDATING 20170302 To: Christoph Moench-Tegeder Cc: gecko@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20170302215013.GA76022@elch.exwg.net> <0a05c7ce-6398-b85c-4b40-a7f80b8f4684@netfence.it> <20170303183837.GA1557@elch.exwg.net> From: Andrea Venturoli Message-ID: Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 19:09:32 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170303183837.GA1557@elch.exwg.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 18:15:18 -0000 On 03/03/17 19:38, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: >> Any interaction with bug 215348 (1)? I'm still using that patch. > > Testing revealed that this patch can prevent new profiles from accessing > lightning, which I considered undesirable. Ok. I kept that patch and just upgraded: my old profile still works, Lightning included, on both my installations. I didn't try Andriy's suggestion, as, for now, I can live with the inability to create new profiles. bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 8 18:36:02 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3F9DD03214 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 18:36:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ot0-x22d.google.com (mail-ot0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c0f::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A623B109D; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 18:36:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ot0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id i1so38947442ota.3; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 10:36:02 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=qvbCtNrijnR/N1cQK7VOdIpJ7CPbkKw758zj97zo644=; b=ZD8Sur0BXorZ/zst3E0BZRAqY58Jq9u2xLkHjiEwQuY4jaL/JT4fq2aPTJC05XtGp4 KhhDAIOJlNT1EPYttCut52qNjuCQzLUBclQ+dhm6PkUzIA1IXQfg3K9L0vzreYlo0vQ3 Ecfn0d737NztnfC96dQ9dFxUqClwJtv6h8UT8KFzUfE4ZRHLRyf20NyaFe4SZhpciIcX FqcoXEWAhNRGs/x2DGrvI1oSjRY9ms8LdLs/Mq2ZdvC3A2578Vkn7gZ20Bw14DMjOdK2 s/LWOWEXcryxamRFLBqkX7jr6ZoT/Zdr5kZCcKDpQ0xEp/W/2t9mTjLVJUwLJX0UVzcx AbFA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=qvbCtNrijnR/N1cQK7VOdIpJ7CPbkKw758zj97zo644=; b=oZf59MzMARcDUL+PBLfubq9Skv3G3qXWScrRN1PhBKJRIzV6KqucTN2qcnRoqpTlLd 475AOS/lamfZopVZRBMSEk4b2HQ1/9JZFCflCm07SkRoPsaA3QiSnV2aAvEywuF+LSSg flN8mzsIZUvp2ppBfSw6BeRR59bi2un0nEknTY7eKJfqsnyiRyuq6Beh3+xdZ9zoT256 QlPLlg0ewqjuKqSqYNuQyLZUKdchkr0H2JcfpPqUQVjBRfvODtoGChTXgjcWNvSh+q2S 3MfUt09fClsa+CgcSD8kkvPce/HHVNdt5dtnec2/EcM64PJ2mthkxDqvdEMDV8gLP4Bh raJA== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lrLzb39Cy57VOQw0umjN4yoaffwTm3VDp3wmYEj0h7oK9PI5Syw7+KBIQpNK0qdQJHnxi3WRsW4BevYQ== X-Received: by 10.157.50.6 with SMTP id t6mr4228465otc.266.1488998161982; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 10:36:01 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.74.32.79 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 10:36:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20170308164059.GZ34495@e-new.0x20.net> References: <20170308160420.GG22199@rancor.immure.com> <20170308164059.GZ34495@e-new.0x20.net> From: Kevin Oberman Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 10:36:01 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: WhZGgZUuieHnM75B_hdaYtsr3gk Message-ID: Subject: Re: Best way to cause synth to ignore rebuilding of a port?? To: Lars Engels Cc: Matthew Seaman , FreeBSD Ports ML Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 18:36:03 -0000 On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Lars Engels wrote: > On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 04:34:45PM +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote: > > On 2017/03/08 16:04, Bob Willcox wrote: > > > Note that I haven't tried ver 52 of firefox, but from what I've read > it sounds > > > like all plugins/addons other than flash are no longer supported. > > > > Make that: all *NPAPI* plugins other than Flash are now unsupported. > > That's stuff like the Java plugin or the OpenH264 Video Codec from Cisco > > (which I seem to have installed and can no-longer remember why. Some > > sort of video conference thing a long time ago). > > The OpenH264 plugin is shipped out of the box. > And is required for HTML5 video if it is X.264 encoded, as it most often is. - Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 8 18:40:12 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA558D032CB for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 18:40:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fjwcash@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qk0-x22d.google.com (mail-qk0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E3EA11BC for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 18:40:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fjwcash@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qk0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id y76so80847075qkb.0 for ; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 10:40:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=7lPNdm1gNoMMOYavrOF+/WR/ZzuY8B1Zea/SQ5jtpqQ=; b=gWBIcwmC45LHPY1jf4sjbF4eGFdv99/VOoNFAayLWVj3/EcCnBBttGHGp5eTz8bMtY GA1Bp9OVRCGWFJixhSL5tv9BXcfOQgWYh8hFr5qFZJzb9YKEJQnXPBJF2wGmbFFO2oob K4gwH8cx/KtVsGmHShjYVOagyQrHyJua4Wakt1ulUaXH7RO+QJdpbt/4X+NsvVsaSBq2 mQ7VUSL5iDsg6OcM/txqj+IJHgyQ4m2Dqorxp8yfVmBPw4X72FIX4a2w2tRbGvblV1ty VEfWYGgS+gFYDBbdAexpPymyJtTF2WzQjUIk5W0oULiv3QaAkqpP/2rn74PTJMXtpqPa TN5A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=7lPNdm1gNoMMOYavrOF+/WR/ZzuY8B1Zea/SQ5jtpqQ=; b=FhDIeiE/Yt0pydieu0ji9/1qNBMoq2aQiahBv5jWByT+CyRrWI5xgbKgMGzp2LTLg1 I9gK9UUBWhJ+MiZezfkbKtscbqj9OO1hQT3MIR2Lp4Cvcd1ZGx9NhNyPO4TRDTRz8Rr8 V+sW6OjLa87d1ZriJ+pnK65XdA6OCPshyyagkVbTVQfKfZmjoxBwKiO5o1fhtWpP+c00 RYQ6swlh/Jo3tv1QbBe3G887p8H/P2OOc3LTN8aKHXV6cWsOV1bucWYST2WuE3rXaoXp h1+R5Ci+/g+rnkf+XYjgU2e7TpPGDH/eADIJqzcTH8YECl08jStpXiR3qEV/oz9zM4eC vsPA== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39ktbb7Rq2/ygbwm7x0nEQEE6arFz4RfWumbCmJCOaYr8LXQsbhciy4n/9St6frTnufBfxfr9JuQBH+N6A== X-Received: by 10.200.0.25 with SMTP id a25mr8844948qtg.199.1488998411573; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 10:40:11 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.28.202 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 10:40:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20170308160420.GG22199@rancor.immure.com> References: <20170308160420.GG22199@rancor.immure.com> From: Freddie Cash Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 10:40:11 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Best way to cause synth to ignore rebuilding of a port?? To: Bob Willcox Cc: ports list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 18:40:12 -0000 On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Bob Willcox wrote: > What is the best way to get synth to simply ignore certain ports when > running > the upgrade-system command with it? I would like for it to not upgrade > firefox > (don't want to lose my tab groups) so I'd rather that it not even conside= r > updating firefox again, at least not till some form of tab groups are aga= in > supported. > > Note that I haven't tried ver 52 of firefox, but from what I've read it > sounds > like all plugins/addons other than flash are no longer supported. > =E2=80=8BSwitch to the ESR version, and all NPAPI plugins will be enabled a= nd supported until around May of next year. :) Firefox 52 disables everything except Flash. Firefox 52ESR leaves everything enabled.=E2=80=8B =E2=80=8Bhttps://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1269807 =E2=80=8B --=20 Freddie Cash fjwcash@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 8 19:03:52 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0023FD0387F for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 19:03:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5F69101F for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 19:03:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E1ADCD0387D; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 19:03:51 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E12A6D0387B; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 19:03:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C663E101D; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 19:03:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1354) id 23C5470F2; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 19:03:51 +0000 (UTC) To: bapt@FreeBSD.org, des@des.no Subject: Re: manpath change for ports ? Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <86mvcvojzt.fsf@desk.des.no> Message-Id: <20170308190351.23C5470F2@freefall.freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 19:03:51 +0000 (UTC) From: jbeich@freebsd.org (Jan Beich) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 19:03:52 -0000 Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes: > Baptiste Daroussin writes: > >> I would like to propose a change in the localbase hier for ports >> >> I think we should add /usr/local/share/man in the manpath along with >> at first and maybe instead of in long term. > > 2) plus info -> share/info as suggested by jbeich > > 3) plus libdata/pkgconfig -> lib/pkgconfig > > These three items will ensure that "./configure --prefix=/usr/local && > make install" will do the right thing out of the box - by changing our > definition of "the right thing" to match what the GNU autotools have > been doing for at least 15 years. /usr/local is *the* default location according to GNU[1] and reinforced by FHS[2] which want it "safe from being overwritten when the system software is updated". Not on FreeBSD where site-local stuff like your example above and ports/packages trample on each other. NetBSD avoided the issue by moving /usr/local to /usr/pkg. [1] https://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/html_node/Directory-Variables.html [2] http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#USRLOCALLOCALHIERARCHY From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 8 19:31:03 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EC42D020C2 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 19:31:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abi@abinet.ru) Received: from mail.abinet.ru (mail.abinet.ru [136.243.72.227]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0383C1D48 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 19:31:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from abi@abinet.ru) Received: from [10.0.0.1] (unknown [10.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.abinet.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0FA8F3E92E for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 19:22:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=abinet.ru; s=dkim; t=1489000927; bh=krFf88gGnDiZ88k4iieEw+41tWY2R5Uv5GwwVwV29qs=; h=To:From:Subject:Date; b=DT/S7aGJgh1AyaCl/nvnc0yB1wBmrmKC/0KPokC6zYcx6cOyfbNOUIig8mZDDScAP nUrGz+Ky5wsPBrIXxSe+SA9uGW3BUGAJ+TI+sIWeN3EYssgCiGfDotkN+bo4dX2qDl eYiTV4vEgRJmN8rI6D1qTSJwfKCs3oS51Nnq7Kbw= To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: abi Subject: multimedia/zoneminder and clang4 - Jan Beich (mail not working) Message-ID: <58C059DD.1040309@abinet.ru> Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 22:22:05 +0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:3.0) Gecko/20100101 Goanna/20170214 FossaMail/38.0.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 19:31:03 -0000 Hello, it's nice that your mail is not working, unfortunately mine is, so can you please commit this stuff and save my mail from pkg-fallout hammering. https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216627 Thank you. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 8 19:41:33 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE275D02516 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 19:41:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95BEA14ED for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 19:41:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 927A6D02514; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 19:41:33 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91C39D02512; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 19:41:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: from mailrelay119.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay119.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.20.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "relay.skynet.be", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8B74314E9; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 19:41:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2BUFwAvXcBY/0nD8VFeHAEBBAEBCgEBg?= =?us-ascii?q?ycqQRBBWYNgin+QWikBlQ6CDYJsgzYCgj9BFwECAQEBAQEBAWsohRYBBSMzIxA?= =?us-ascii?q?LGAICBSECAg8qHgYTigOwTIIminwBAQEBBgEBAQEkgQuKMoRUgwaCXwWcNo1Dh?= =?us-ascii?q?Gh2gSqPDZM+IAE2gQM3LAiHFD81ihMBAQE?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2BUFwAvXcBY/0nD8VFeHAEBBAEBCgEBgycqQRBBWYNgin+?= =?us-ascii?q?QWikBlQ6CDYJsgzYCgj9BFwECAQEBAQEBAWsohRYBBSMzIxALGAICBSECAg8qH?= =?us-ascii?q?gYTigOwTIIminwBAQEBBgEBAQEkgQuKMoRUgwaCXwWcNo1DhGh2gSqPDZM+IAE?= =?us-ascii?q?2gQM3LAiHFD81ihMBAQE?= Received: from 73.195-241-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([81.241.195.73]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 08 Mar 2017 20:41:28 +0100 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v28JfR3U052294; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 20:41:27 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 20:41:26 +0100 From: Tijl Coosemans To: Dag-Erling =?UTF-8?B?U23DuHJncmF2?= Cc: Baptiste Daroussin , ports@FreeBSD.org, arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: manpath change for ports ? Message-ID: <20170308204126.6d152c44@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <86mvcvojzt.fsf@desk.des.no> References: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> <86mvcvojzt.fsf@desk.des.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 19:41:33 -0000 On Wed, 08 Mar 2017 16:39:50 +0100 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav wr= ote: > 4) Remove the hardcoded library path in lang/gcc* >=20 > This makes it possible to work on software that includes both libraries > and programs while an earlier copy of the same software is already > installed. With the current state of gcc, the programs you are working > on will be linked against the version of the library that's already > installed instead of the version you just compiled, and there is nothing > you can do to prevent it. You won't notice anything if all you ever do > is "make && make install", because the new library will replace the old, > but if you try to run your program directly from the build tree, it will > use the wrong library. This can be incredibly frustrating if you're not > aware of it - imagine you're trying to fix a bug in that library and no > matter what you do, your regression test keeps failing... If you want to run a program from its build directory and the program links to a library also in the build directory then you have to run the program with LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable set to the build directory. Or, you could link the program with -rpath , but then you should relink it before installation. It's one of the things libtool takes care of automatically. If this is the problem you have then it has nothing to do with gcc. If you're not using libtool then your program probably does not have any rpath or runpath so it falls back on rtld/ldconfig which may find it in /usr/local/lib. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 8 19:49:16 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0BE8D02650 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 19:49:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B66B8179A for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 19:49:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B0C59D0264E; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 19:49:16 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE51FD02648; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 19:49:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: from mailrelay119.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay119.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.20.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "relay.skynet.be", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BD5841798; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 19:49:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2CMDACAX8BY/0nD8VFeHAEBBAEBCgEBg?= =?us-ascii?q?1FBEIEajl+QWikBlxuGIgKCP0MVAQIBAQEBAQEBayiFFQEBAQECATocIwULCw4?= =?us-ascii?q?KCSUPKh4GE4l3DLJ5inwBAQEBAQUBAQEBJIs9ijkFnDaSK3aQN5M+NSKBAzcsC?= =?us-ascii?q?IcUPzWKEwEBAQ?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2CMDACAX8BY/0nD8VFeHAEBBAEBCgEBg1FBEIEajl+QWik?= =?us-ascii?q?BlxuGIgKCP0MVAQIBAQEBAQEBayiFFQEBAQECATocIwULCw4KCSUPKh4GE4l3D?= =?us-ascii?q?LJ5inwBAQEBAQUBAQEBJIs9ijkFnDaSK3aQN5M+NSKBAzcsCIcUPzWKEwEBAQ?= Received: from 73.195-241-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([81.241.195.73]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 08 Mar 2017 20:49:13 +0100 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v28JnCP5052336; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 20:49:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 20:49:12 +0100 From: Tijl Coosemans To: Warner Losh Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Dag-Erling =?UTF-8?B?U23DuHJncmF2?= , Baptiste Daroussin , "freebsd-arch@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: manpath change for ports ? Message-ID: <20170308204912.5cfd861d@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> <86mvcvojzt.fsf@desk.des.no> <20170308182124.79c4bc13@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 19:49:16 -0000 On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 10:31:32 -0700 Warner Losh wrote: > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> Are you talking about gcc implicitly searching /usr/local/include and >> /usr/local/lib? > > That's currently inconsistent between base gcc, clang, binutils and > ports versions. I forget which ones do and which ones don't search > automatically. It's only ports binutils and ports gcc that search /usr/local. > IMHO, they all should. I used to think this too, but now I think it should be possible to use any compiler to compile something from base or something that should only depend on things from base, for testing purposes or perhaps because it needs to be deployed on some other machine. Compilers shouldn't search /usr/local implicitly then. It's easy enough to add -I and -L flags (perhaps using pkg-config) but it's not easy to remove built-in -I and -L flags. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 8 19:57:09 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66A35D02958 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 19:57:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@immure.com) Received: from maul.immure.com (108-84-10-9.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.84.10.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 464211D5F for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 19:57:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com ([10.1.132.9]) by maul.immure.com with esmtp (Exim 4.88 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1clhhp-000K45-J7; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 13:57:06 -0600 Received: from rancor.immure.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v28Jv5Y8018560; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 13:57:05 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: (from bob@localhost) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.14.9/Submit) id v28Jv5ww018559; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 13:57:05 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from bob) Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 13:57:05 -0600 From: Bob Willcox To: Freddie Cash Cc: ports list Subject: Re: Best way to cause synth to ignore rebuilding of a port?? Message-ID: <20170308195705.GI22199@rancor.immure.com> Reply-To: Bob Willcox References: <20170308160420.GG22199@rancor.immure.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 19:57:09 -0000 On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:40:11AM -0800, Freddie Cash wrote: > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Bob Willcox wrote: > > > What is the best way to get synth to simply ignore certain ports when > > running > > the upgrade-system command with it? I would like for it to not upgrade > > firefox > > (don't want to lose my tab groups) so I'd rather that it not even consider > > updating firefox again, at least not till some form of tab groups are again > > supported. > > > > Note that I haven't tried ver 52 of firefox, but from what I've read it > > sounds > > like all plugins/addons other than flash are no longer supported. > > > > ???Switch to the ESR version, and all NPAPI plugins will be enabled and > supported until around May of next year. :) > > Firefox 52 disables everything except Flash. > Firefox 52ESR leaves everything enabled.??? > > ???https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1269807 > ??? > > -- > Freddie Cash > fjwcash@gmail.com Yeah, but isn't the ESR version relatively down-level WRT to version 51 that I'm currently using? The Makefile in www/firefox-esr has a verison of 45.8.0. Not anxious to go backwards on everything. -- Bob Willcox | If a program is useful, it will be changed. bob@immure.com | Austin, TX | From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 8 20:31:53 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09295D0324A for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 20:31:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi0-x22e.google.com (mail-oi0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9D771D1C for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 20:31:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-oi0-x22e.google.com with SMTP id 2so26228354oif.0 for ; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 12:31:52 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=n1Rb97iyEfd2ZX13KpG1ctXqvRrAh9aCRlgcdSj8fSc=; b=nHBeBQwjRxcOHNgmPTE3fPptLEP9ERSGbC/qznRZRyh0iggN+mx++A4FszrAqy5F7Q lC3L/2yjJdciF3y367WFSVvtems7gxN/z5gpgy4zJ3oVZOM3rUDLfnjnXfX/V1gIbey3 D+/5sbTBdloiQHz4GcT2R40nYKjJnZ5KvSVM45LlVypC6km6vOL0H2uWjTLgJfiJ7SQ6 Cg0l+GFlKtGfe71r/pX46XlDy86FfEuU/Pxtth53JwH3mKSCBgFqXVSY5WbtmsC1IzEQ reaYjFFhR4PPe35BkWC4eGGGBbO4Bs9tHkmx9qK2kHsviQrODnM0wEvS9j3ue5IMNIfb uu4Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=n1Rb97iyEfd2ZX13KpG1ctXqvRrAh9aCRlgcdSj8fSc=; b=o3V28bxWpy1iYVal+AFueopeqSqfWPK5rPIjYy5C0pTW91C+F6H0bXGL0+vDRS6Hxo U7FS2jSLs66A1X1Zd1VcysQKGqIPBEfBre3musu3qL2YAtEiQwpsDOhgmq/NpVyjvT9T l1/q4Yym78klyKEbv5N5NuTCWEKU+2KefSxWTBTQAClRgcpcFP0RLXuJv6dA0QVA2a4U BhTd3Xy5g5m1CyerXMK1F79KzYnbtn5HEMGNonGManxa6ur5a3PAvjaTpipCn6uxaHqW kZgD/aEMvqG/kznQwjiFoYp/nMYtNw2/IBNeXNKW3mypIKNSBM//dWHp5zYW9o9dArs4 KU9g== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lB0I1cKXm6fIIx7iDrbAF9n1CNYYLRY8LSHZi4/5a9ECC2Ej6HWozwAM3uq116X09GtmFz5wuph63WKQ== X-Received: by 10.202.181.11 with SMTP id e11mr4796878oif.57.1489005111988; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 12:31:51 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.74.32.79 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 12:31:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20170308195705.GI22199@rancor.immure.com> References: <20170308160420.GG22199@rancor.immure.com> <20170308195705.GI22199@rancor.immure.com> From: Kevin Oberman Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 12:31:51 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: xYcJaou-m42XpqjYYtCz6aaJPu8 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Best way to cause synth to ignore rebuilding of a port?? To: Bob Willcox Cc: Freddie Cash , ports list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 20:31:53 -0000 On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Bob Willcox wrote: > On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:40:11AM -0800, Freddie Cash wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Bob Willcox wrote: > > > > > What is the best way to get synth to simply ignore certain ports when > > > running > > > the upgrade-system command with it? I would like for it to not upgrade > > > firefox > > > (don't want to lose my tab groups) so I'd rather that it not even > consider > > > updating firefox again, at least not till some form of tab groups are > again > > > supported. > > > > > > Note that I haven't tried ver 52 of firefox, but from what I've read it > > > sounds > > > like all plugins/addons other than flash are no longer supported. > > > > > > > ???Switch to the ESR version, and all NPAPI plugins will be enabled and > > supported until around May of next year. :) > > > > Firefox 52 disables everything except Flash. > > Firefox 52ESR leaves everything enabled.??? > > > > ???https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1269807 > > ??? > > > > -- > > Freddie Cash > > fjwcash@gmail.com > > Yeah, but isn't the ESR version relatively down-level WRT to version 51 > that > I'm currently using? The Makefile in www/firefox-esr has a verison of > 45.8.0. > > Not anxious to go backwards on everything. > > -- > Bob Willcox | If a program is useful, it will be changed. > bob@immure.com | > Austin, TX | Color me confused. I am running Firefox 52.0 and currently have both Flash and the Cisco H.264 plugins (according to about:plugins). So the H.264 must not be NPAPI or there is another exception. Since the H.264 plugin is a part of the Firefox distribution, I suspect it is a special case, a rather important one on the same level as Flash. (Really more important.) Today (or, maybe yesterday) version 52.0 was declared the new ESR release, replacing 45.8. Since I don't run ESR, I have not looked into the state of the ESR port for FreeBSD. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 8 20:34:49 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45696D03462 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 20:34:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 22D3A1EBA for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 20:34:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1354) id 6AD407E3D; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 20:34:48 +0000 (UTC) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Best way to cause synth to ignore rebuilding of a port?? In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <20170308203448.6AD407E3D@freefall.freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 20:34:48 +0000 (UTC) From: jbeich@freebsd.org (Jan Beich) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 20:34:49 -0000 Kevin Oberman writes: > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:40 AM, Lars Engels wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 04:34:45PM +0000, Matthew Seaman wrote: >> > On 2017/03/08 16:04, Bob Willcox wrote: >> > > Note that I haven't tried ver 52 of firefox, but from what I've read >> it sounds >> > > like all plugins/addons other than flash are no longer supported. >> > >> > Make that: all *NPAPI* plugins other than Flash are now unsupported. >> > That's stuff like the Java plugin or the OpenH264 Video Codec from Cisco >> > (which I seem to have installed and can no-longer remember why. Some >> > sort of video conference thing a long time ago). >> >> The OpenH264 plugin is shipped out of the box. Only on Tier1 platforms (Windows, OS X, Android, Linux) where Firefox downloads it[1] shortly after install. The situation is similar with Widevine CDM or soon PPAPI Flash[2]. Even if someone provided FreeBSD binaries or implemented a wrapper[3] it'd also lower security due to lack of sandboxing[4]. WebAssembly should obsolete native code but existing plugins are unlikely to go away in near future. [1] Downstream builds lack patent license, see http://www.openh264.org/BINARY_LICENSE.txt [2] http://searchfox.org/mozilla-central/source/browser/extensions/mortar/host/flash/bootstrap.js [3] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1295853#c13 [4] https://wiki.mozilla.org/Security/Sandbox > And is required for HTML5 video if it is X.264 encoded, as it most often is. OpenH264 only supports Baseline profile and primarily used for WebRTC. For HTML5 videos Firefox uses FFmpeg (H.264, VP9), libvpx (VP8), libtheora. $ x264 -o bar.mp4 foo.y4m [...] x264 [info]: profile High, level 3.0 [...] From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 8 20:38:01 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D804CD03505 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 20:38:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scratch65535@att.net) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC0D31FCA for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 20:38:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scratch65535@att.net) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id B87B5D03504; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 20:38:01 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8218D03503 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 20:38:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scratch65535@att.net) Received: from nm24-vm6.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm24-vm6.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [216.39.63.172]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 91C181FC9 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 20:38:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scratch65535@att.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=att.net; s=s1024; t=1489005314; bh=D1200HnVBOlwn02/F4i4cxWYVpsjAkzcgz9w8/UAsn0=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From:Subject; b=VbqbRJFofRt9dxO4dK1f7j8vA2+DkqU2opzcM8OXOmNil9M5YPZ23SuWpAeUCrecsEKJ7AtwrK9/6DxdAxmUcgJ/wnXFLIfJa2Y9p5CjI+2J3Nv4YatbA9iQz9d3/t+Y1Uc6atgMwwrcKJJsV6h3sel3Dt9dklSOMlIoWR//FaY= Received: from [216.39.60.176] by nm24.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Mar 2017 20:35:14 -0000 Received: from [67.195.23.148] by tm12.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Mar 2017 20:35:14 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp120.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 08 Mar 2017 20:35:14 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 758260.1484.bm@smtp120.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: KAxe22QVM1lOe6CI0XvEyTmlOmhI8854W1s7.tc1YRwRVmA jzUjlR7K2fNczQ8lksbQOYPjSk9SOKoBiTR1WCXBxWw9.EcZFZDaupX0zY0c FOCf6vlgVjGSn.WmM7SkEj1SzsZfuKDVUJWLwoJ4nlaQkP7XgG5BKIPS8i4n cPcSNPVzWhJSgiEna8HRbX0P72yUKp0GwKpYJul7NJuyNNAVrqT5Dp3EL3I7 fFjwyKuSYY0ialxbjHfEmAcbySOVFmfQNIBufae4yj3jnDYv_.JWwMXbu.qG HizT0vsN9giqsBVxEGJdXB2Um08QbQOuqxZZEaaXn3sREmhSUpZT8ND1I4wZ LqYrid7nMw7NoL74NUu7g_XQUYu.bXn6pDnXYy9NE32GRQsI0aNXNnchpW9U JIg6IUlGQ_czKRzX2HM1OvDkrIfbRQKPfp2QSieboefR6ZbC9VJn8UPbw9fd XlhwFxEfgjDEBKz5VqYIwHDrMrfoSKjGVottHo_bEhnVc4czr5SwXIEK4PC5 MNezuL4uQCZQ86A6HYbr9Lusoz4XsG9H.YVh4l4XxPVYc5.RtdcKQ7Cw- X-Yahoo-SMTP: pPvqnOaswBBbYZLVYFzvU7GaowLcbNioPp.aF8KvOjZk From: To: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: manpath change for ports ? Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 15:35:14 -0500 Message-ID: References: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> In-Reply-To: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> X-Mailer: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 20:38:01 -0000 On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 00:56:10 +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: >Hi all, > >I would like to propose a change in the localbase hier for ports > >I think we should add /usr/local/share/man in the manpath along with at first >and maybe instead of in long term. > >The reason is: >- /usr/local/share/man seems more consistent to me with base which have: > /usr/share/man >- It will remove lots of patches from the ports tree where were we need to patch > upstream build system to install in a non usual path. > >My proposal is to add to the manpath /usr/local/share/man in default man(1) >command in FreeBSD 12 (MFCed to 11-STABLE) > >and either provide an errata for 11.0/10.3 or a >/usr/local/etc/man.d/something.conf via a port or something like that for those >two, what do you think? > >For the same reason I would like to allow porters to stop patching (with pathfix >or anything else) the path for pkgconfig files and allow >/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig along with the current >/usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig:/usr/libdata/pkgconfig > >Which will also remove tons of hacks from the ports tree. > >What do you think? > >Best regards, >Bapt I would argue that the same principle should be followed with *everything*: if it's at or applies to the application level, it should be in /usr/local/, no exceptions. And if that conflicts with the native product documentation (e.g. MySQL, MariaDB), the local mods should be right up at the top of the relevant man page, not on some special web site or in some special documentation hiding in the weeds somewhere. Nobody should have to chase down necessary information; if the man pages are the canonical documentation, then all the facts should be on the man page. And if something is not at the application level, then perhaps this is the right time and place to have a conversation about whether there should be a separate subtree for the layer between the apps and the kernel, too. The desire for long-term stability, predictability, and freedom from bugs is not a joke or a wish for a pony. It's a basic sine-qua-non necessity for production-quality software, especially servers. Would splitting off the middle layer from the kernel help or hinder that goal? The question must be worth a conversation, and the sooner the better. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 8 21:13:40 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C641ED03E7B for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 21:13:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@immure.com) Received: from maul.immure.com (108-84-10-9.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.84.10.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99C0A15FF for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 21:13:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com ([10.1.132.9]) by maul.immure.com with esmtp (Exim 4.88 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1clitt-000KDq-RA; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 15:13:39 -0600 Received: from rancor.immure.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v28LDbhV018800; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 15:13:37 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: (from bob@localhost) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.14.9/Submit) id v28LDbgl018799; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 15:13:37 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from bob) Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 15:13:37 -0600 From: Bob Willcox To: Kevin Oberman Cc: Freddie Cash , ports list Subject: Re: Best way to cause synth to ignore rebuilding of a port?? Message-ID: <20170308211337.GJ22199@rancor.immure.com> Reply-To: Bob Willcox References: <20170308160420.GG22199@rancor.immure.com> <20170308195705.GI22199@rancor.immure.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 21:13:40 -0000 On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 12:31:51PM -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Bob Willcox wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:40:11AM -0800, Freddie Cash wrote: > > > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Bob Willcox wrote: > > > > > > > What is the best way to get synth to simply ignore certain ports when > > > > running > > > > the upgrade-system command with it? I would like for it to not upgrade > > > > firefox > > > > (don't want to lose my tab groups) so I'd rather that it not even > > consider > > > > updating firefox again, at least not till some form of tab groups are > > again > > > > supported. > > > > > > > > Note that I haven't tried ver 52 of firefox, but from what I've read it > > > > sounds > > > > like all plugins/addons other than flash are no longer supported. > > > > > > > > > > ???Switch to the ESR version, and all NPAPI plugins will be enabled and > > > supported until around May of next year. :) > > > > > > Firefox 52 disables everything except Flash. > > > Firefox 52ESR leaves everything enabled.??? > > > > > > ???https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1269807 > > > ??? > > > > > > -- > > > Freddie Cash > > > fjwcash@gmail.com > > > > Yeah, but isn't the ESR version relatively down-level WRT to version 51 > > that > > I'm currently using? The Makefile in www/firefox-esr has a verison of > > 45.8.0. > > > > Not anxious to go backwards on everything. > > > > -- > > Bob Willcox | If a program is useful, it will be changed. > > bob@immure.com | > > Austin, TX | > > > Color me confused. I am running Firefox 52.0 and currently have both Flash > and the Cisco H.264 plugins (according to about:plugins). So the H.264 must > not be NPAPI or there is another exception. Since the H.264 plugin is a > part of the Firefox distribution, I suspect it is a special case, a rather > important one on the same level as Flash. (Really more important.) > > Today (or, maybe yesterday) version 52.0 was declared the new ESR release, > replacing 45.8. Since I don't run ESR, I have not looked into the state of > the ESR port for FreeBSD. Hmm, the plugin/addon I use and would be lost without is for tab groups. Do they still work in 52? > -- > Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer > E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com > PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 -- Bob Willcox | If a program is useful, it will be changed. bob@immure.com | Austin, TX | From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 8 23:05:30 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B26CD03703 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 23:05:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rozhuk.im@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf0-x22c.google.com (mail-lf0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E70F21357 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 23:05:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rozhuk.im@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf0-x22c.google.com with SMTP id j90so21075382lfk.2 for ; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 15:05:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=WQxYv0Y90qFjioGAge29TwYNPMOJnW3dPNpDiDWtgm0=; b=DBY9m93MermhpqBukYWr/jVow69KbRGrKwNwK1BEvMRPTMwQZ9Wjx/D+7oGL4+/nri NW1keqDSpdF426hRMnevn+Z5AiN7zXxNT99jGR1mHe6SGJxjKfExTJS4+ftoNoR1X53Y FV2u35UQ/ZfJbYOR34I3VP7FL1eKOwcwF0SAfQNhiVfn+p9kq94g9lBFopO0/hNBaEmT JANlreKwF9SIXsZYIWitDJlYsQl+Pm6kQj9HvoVIrsqV6Ipq8tRnETHIArpupWBbn9Bn lZ7r0DyDSr0kSsZiiSMtvReFBbA09Xkedm4LQYjvlJt2bdea8jCoU0lNh9PU7dJm2wFW 7zVg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=WQxYv0Y90qFjioGAge29TwYNPMOJnW3dPNpDiDWtgm0=; b=sl080U/qJK6Bqf8krdgodrL7FdE/5CGbCR5wENB2D3xx8JGURiAl6LMrQBPnV9Ddhj pPAjt7UzR7KW9ZtKOwcHRxf0zO3MAer++DQVjwY7+jBU4tXp0anmT6pVJGlBytcqZU1O yRjdmdOoq1Ezd512Xq1xhXpGfWZ/TAPIbXgxDTclnCOG2kT7GsHr6eBvOIRzejMd+xKl mb+BdjgNe8t2toQ2dnJEYxT7vwcWjPuyW3vNb+q2+wSBKmd/0bUEJ1MGxqx22yU3H8Iy YSH0BbKPiZiWsaE97vTMcySLV4J8DdAN0tkThnjmkOFbOTSB3DaV1f9E/x+bFDr8bxK/ IEuQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nIYJW6dcXIeXmTMWredIuvUNrYHipKy0Ij2/8bsfXElDxrtmj71HSDkoJ1ItYFgw== X-Received: by 10.25.234.71 with SMTP id i68mr2355674lfh.25.1489014327764; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 15:05:27 -0800 (PST) Received: from rimwks ([2001:470:28:81a:6ef0:49ff:fe75:38e3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id l78sm870002lfl.59.2017.03.08.15.05.26 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 08 Mar 2017 15:05:27 -0800 (PST) From: Rozhuk Ivan X-Google-Original-From: Rozhuk Ivan Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 02:05:25 +0300 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: maintensers does not respond for long time Message-ID: <20170309020525.6831cd34@rimwks> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.1 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 23:05:30 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=213790 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216050 Patch ready to apply, but no respond from maintenser (2+ weeks) What next? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 8 23:09:38 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 27EE9D03788 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 23:09:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rozhuk.im@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf0-x22d.google.com (mail-lf0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c07::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97F1314B1 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 23:09:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rozhuk.im@gmail.com) Received: by mail-lf0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id a6so21147201lfa.0 for ; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 15:09:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:date:to:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Q2Ang482GJ4/Ip3IfrEJB1BUPRPzHte2LwknSf/dDlQ=; b=gg7GpYPyP/3UYa4fvEVKEOuKy17r8Si+ceU9DiXQS8VUigEhI6PU0AmZhmrbBB0fw6 WbfoD47b8lVirrzqdsX7EggSHN4xVXfjiTx7OteuApFi1b4tBCn5f3zis7kJor/rfnVT hyX9LLDlZ+n7B9ZNuGV4ze+F4otBhOwivA1rSE4tiQoCqPb11jRpdCHf+B59FjiyVrBo +3mbJ9dHM7HrIhmBK2h5N10/oOdV7WetgQ7hgaHVeaSP6Rc0Omk2lBW82UrrW9yio/bD MfCqpG27X8NAlHsGKaTFArtSl1VY2uYCw3uU/JLbIriprqHCFkatZcU28gSwGCcAmkYc KIcg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:date:to:subject:message-id:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding; bh=Q2Ang482GJ4/Ip3IfrEJB1BUPRPzHte2LwknSf/dDlQ=; b=GjXEuQlwSHkQ5tvHHb+QTahrKQKrb3425F3gcJzCoPdC5LTYKZZIahitJqjOSk1T7p 1VEYL/6ISDpFcpo49OHC1nc0wONI+G5oITLvjs0PqU4W83VYbsoycpz5dWDx0sevKVKV BVvjGgkhkgTlct7DpUqj24ToJL1E3sQOlGy7io3skiz4LkgfwJxxAXH8F2u5ag0tri6H kApEHj6au3M2fV2qpwxDl+suYNKOmK+fgI5tknjGkGsE99yvPmxoUvVS2QTaQovxui0U 0wra3x5yRJgBmKDaOQNuDVMQ9ayyeyqy4G+EviN2hJDiFqZ5HBZwz61mFHUMl2JRygh1 Uf3w== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nppZgRVAgN+ttOLUv3QfGZBQBNjMxQvmYpXhB5BD80YhvLDNlgP9CLLv0LtU1Muw== X-Received: by 10.46.82.66 with SMTP id g63mr2943873ljb.113.1489014575916; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 15:09:35 -0800 (PST) Received: from rimwks ([2001:470:28:81a:6ef0:49ff:fe75:38e3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 91sm893433lft.17.2017.03.08.15.09.34 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Wed, 08 Mar 2017 15:09:35 -0800 (PST) From: Rozhuk Ivan X-Google-Original-From: Rozhuk Ivan Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 02:09:32 +0300 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Rozhuk Ivan Subject: new port Message-ID: <20170309020932.4762cdc8@rimwks> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.14.1 (GTK+ 2.24.29; amd64-portbld-freebsd11.0) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 23:09:38 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215907 devel/libaravis: glib/gobject based library for video acquisition using Genicam cameras https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215908 multimedia/aravis: glib/gobject based viewer for video acquisition using Genicam cameras https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=210505 graphics/opencv: Update to 3.2 First two done, last in process. I want to be maintainer. What I need to do? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Wed Mar 8 23:48:00 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37163D022AE for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 23:48:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fjwcash@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qk0-x22a.google.com (mail-qk0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFEC91908 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 23:47:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fjwcash@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qk0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id 1so94455936qkl.3 for ; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 15:47:59 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=R4nQZYMOvUKPV2g4SInc3gHmWBFoaThp7vkyoaZz0Vs=; b=RKdAFEmQs+EChImtsTXYHE7uhr27jUSNe7p4DCNMpkzvvmJL57L+X94TapGaFfWM8E 2uq6pyH6hzuKQ0/1FNd9HOGRjeFvXZucbGqhgZ2BKGzaGO4iSJkhgFzi3pG7ziWRXZUK fSckbhTEPON7oX2hSBqa8zyMc/h6HWVCTBfvyyqCF9ybpipyXuBsj0ot/1gIsyuPPWXe nkKiIK/V0a5G8Hk2tYbjsQngYYEF6adNN3amvjqWvAgbtAkgWiyjSJCqDnnAPwXcb3E2 YZ7lcFGMJ2izZM2phUUTpsZbYmN8QxOGCQhtzwH0YRzoUN6JHppkWEomg9NuDhTiyHlD t3gQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=R4nQZYMOvUKPV2g4SInc3gHmWBFoaThp7vkyoaZz0Vs=; b=i1KshVhF+3R9b3LvUsEKk1uAP4JFFmZWZzrAXtGIQ1ZsQuOcHahIkk+TwCxdyXDrFT o2Xb69NnrjDzlZeXyAH+OEHKmXmf9Ny1u4Cwyi5gVc+MgR+92PIkEHMSwr1kf0JFFZkx /Kt+o+/9Odo52e9TmBNyjuIStvnhLAmMBh/H/ZRM5l3hBJabUhR2JzC4VRUNclXJFsyC X517lmDaxaxBfHkakFsWM1Y86h9RGevw5CKqgtXCmk+I/GNZ8k2rkfSvl00n4naET8W0 Icx0fYj+jKvJZIl0RwjrZlOBHAfTIxIbdyS3Ra9/lE370aYI6BtJrUpw38I0BszssXbY mpNg== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lsoIwrRYrRF4CbrUYgrYo+Btcswg4Sugi5IR5zNygQCno3yWigLxRgHL5ZGOEcRI2jTPeXORMcNbNmOA== X-Received: by 10.237.37.121 with SMTP id w54mr11766042qtc.14.1489016879126; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 15:47:59 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.140.28.202 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 15:47:58 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20170308195705.GI22199@rancor.immure.com> References: <20170308160420.GG22199@rancor.immure.com> <20170308195705.GI22199@rancor.immure.com> From: Freddie Cash Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 15:47:58 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Best way to cause synth to ignore rebuilding of a port?? To: Bob Willcox Cc: ports list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 23:48:00 -0000 On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Bob Willcox wrote: > On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:40:11AM -0800, Freddie Cash wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Bob Willcox wrote: > > > > > What is the best way to get synth to simply ignore certain ports when > > > running > > > the upgrade-system command with it? I would like for it to not upgrad= e > > > firefox > > > (don't want to lose my tab groups) so I'd rather that it not even > consider > > > updating firefox again, at least not till some form of tab groups are > again > > > supported. > > > > > > Note that I haven't tried ver 52 of firefox, but from what I've read = it > > > sounds > > > like all plugins/addons other than flash are no longer supported. > > > > > > > ???Switch to the ESR version, and all NPAPI plugins will be enabled and > > supported until around May of next year. :) > > > > Firefox 52 disables everything except Flash. > > Firefox 52ESR leaves everything enabled.??? > > > > ???https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D1269807 > > ??? > > > > -- > > Freddie Cash > > fjwcash@gmail.com > > Yeah, but isn't the ESR version relatively down-level WRT to version 51 > that > I'm currently using? The Makefile in www/firefox-esr has a verison of > 45.8.0. > > Not anxious to go backwards on everything. > > =E2=80=8B52ESR was just released. Give the ports maintainer time to get = it into the tree. :) (Note, I don't have Firefox on FreeBSD at the moment so just going by what's released online, not what's available in the ports tree.)= =E2=80=8B --=20 Freddie Cash fjwcash@gmail.com From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Mar 9 00:22:50 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D192ED0171F for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 00:22:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B4DCE61A; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 00:22:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1354) id 07EE93801; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 00:22:50 +0000 (UTC) To: bob@immure.com, fjwcash@gmail.com Subject: Re: Best way to cause synth to ignore rebuilding of a port?? Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: Message-Id: <20170309002250.07EE93801@freefall.freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 00:22:50 +0000 (UTC) From: jbeich@freebsd.org (Jan Beich) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 00:22:50 -0000 Freddie Cash writes: > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Bob Willcox wrote: > >> On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:40:11AM -0800, Freddie Cash wrote: >> > On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 8:04 AM, Bob Willcox wrote: >> > >> > > What is the best way to get synth to simply ignore certain ports when >> > > running >> > > the upgrade-system command with it? I would like for it to not upgrade >> > > firefox >> > > (don't want to lose my tab groups) so I'd rather that it not even consider >> > > updating firefox again, at least not till some form of tab groups are again >> > > supported. >> > > >> > > Note that I haven't tried ver 52 of firefox, but from what I've read it >> > > sounds >> > > like all plugins/addons other than flash are no longer supported. >> > > >> > >> > Switch to the ESR version, and all NPAPI plugins will be enabled and >> > supported until around May of next year. :) >> > >> > Firefox 52 disables everything except Flash. >> > Firefox 52ESR leaves everything enabled. >> > >> > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1269807 >> > >> >> Yeah, but isn't the ESR version relatively down-level WRT to version 51 >> that >> I'm currently using? The Makefile in www/firefox-esr has a verison of >> 45.8.0. >> >> Not anxious to go backwards on everything. >> > 52ESR was just released. Give the ports maintainer time to get it into > the tree. :) (Note, I don't have Firefox on FreeBSD at the moment so just > going by what's released online, not what's available in the ports tree.) What's the point of rushing into ESR 52 from stable ESR 45 ? If you didn't notice comment 136 in upstream bug mentions a workaround for non-ESR channel. www/firefox-esr switch can drag until 2017-06-13 when ESR 45 would reach EOL. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Mar 9 01:36:48 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D689D03B4D for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 01:36:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from taro.utanet.at (taro.utanet.at [IPv6:2001:938:1337:25::25:45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5E9961CE for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 01:36:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=utanet.at; s=rev1; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:Subject:References:To; bh=asa5vLrOmz9FzCMQ2xdRRVd37tc3yn+lGmDPMEE9GNs=; b=pT46VHNFC4x1PKNAVVFn3P7LpHl59lQly8/O6LF6s7SERAdfaNQt4U90+K/xttddaCxWytZ40ohprUYF1mRHY2nEiAMukyfK3+NeVCZmOvhxESsK6z9wpYk6vQsE3rjKwnRWdf53KI6vfLFGtAASZMDHAG9lH74E4HX8Oiz6JfE=; Received: from patricia.xoc.tele2net.at ([213.90.36.9]) by taro.utanet.at with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1cln0V-0002z7-Bt for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 02:36:43 +0100 Received: from 62-47-168-124.adsl.highway.telekom.at ([62.47.168.124] helo=[10.0.0.93]) by patricia.xoc.tele2net.at with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1cln0V-0005OU-A0 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 02:36:43 +0100 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20170308195705.GI22199@rancor.immure.com> Subject: Re: Best way to cause synth to ignore rebuilding of a port?? From: Walter Schwarzenfeld Message-ID: <67cd43b6-7d0a-e110-c3e9-bf6d89a1c539@utanet.at> Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 02:36:39 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170308195705.GI22199@rancor.immure.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TELE2-Authenticated-As: cf62768e218b4d81d95cc5390f1bd9dfc8b05683 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 01:36:48 -0000 The best way to cause synth to ignore rebuilding of a port is mark th port as broken. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Mar 9 03:23:20 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85E95CD46C5 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 03:23:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ler@lerctr.org) Received: from thebighonker.lerctr.org (thebighonker.lerctr.org [IPv6:2001:470:1f0f:3ad:223:7dff:fe9e:6e8a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "thebighonker.lerctr.org", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6532B1317 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 03:23:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ler@lerctr.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lerctr.org; s=lerami; h=Content-type:Mime-version:Message-ID:To:From:Subject:Date:Sender :Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=/Hra3Ev4NKkgJJeAAjGFUVAYE2y6JaR4EYhR+vrznPw=; b=pUNd6DgOH4XlkYFOKo9pwESaqp +1QvKzzQMIebdx8mSmyh45zCRwYcm+Ur4JkqutenMWlqh/nsZIkVJXU4bBhnG0k2pMTYj5O8HpJnL 2/gAXUk6iwGoJThwu27tbReJC2w+Ic0HNpCQgrSrMtaE7vSVaL35l/Jr9I+q0RkiNZFg=; Received: from [74.196.220.26] (port=40091 helo=[192.168.200.198]) by thebighonker.lerctr.org with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.88 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1cloff-000ONJ-Lv for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 21:23:19 -0600 User-Agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1f.0.170216 Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 21:23:17 -0600 Subject: Libsrs2: Link Fail From: Larry Rosenman To: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Message-ID: Thread-Topic: Libsrs2: Link Fail Mime-version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 03:23:20 -0000 http://home.lerctr.org:8888/data/p110amd64-host-ports/2017-03-08_21h18m13s/= logs/errors/libsrs2-1.0.18_3.log =20 cc -shared=C2=A0 srs2.lo sha1.lo=C2=A0=C2=A0 -Wl,-soname -Wl,libsrs2.so.0 -o .libs/libs= rs2.so.0.0.0 /usr/bin/ld: sha1.lo: relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against `__stack_chk_guard@@= FBSD_1.0' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC /usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Bad value cc: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation= ) *** [libsrs2.la] Error code 1 =20 make[3]: stopped in /wrkdirs/usr/ports/mail/libsrs2/work/libsrs2-1.0.18/lib= srs2 1 error =20 make[3]: stopped in /wrkdirs/usr/ports/mail/libsrs2/work/libsrs2-1.0.18/lib= srs2 *** [all-recursive] Error code 1 =20 make[2]: stopped in /wrkdirs/usr/ports/mail/libsrs2/work/libsrs2-1.0.18 1 error =20 make[2]: stopped in /wrkdirs/usr/ports/mail/libsrs2/work/libsrs2-1.0.18 *** [all-recursive-am] Error code 2 =20 make[1]: stopped in /wrkdirs/usr/ports/mail/libsrs2/work/libsrs2-1.0.18 1 error =20 make[1]: stopped in /wrkdirs/usr/ports/mail/libsrs2/work/libsrs2-1.0.18 =20 =20 -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 214-642-9640 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org US Mail: 17716 Limpia Crk, Round Rock, TX 78664-7281 =20 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Mar 9 03:35:03 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2D38CD4C25 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 03:35:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from anoxia.adamw.org (anoxia.adamw.org [104.225.8.149]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "anoxia.adamw.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A2CCA1A47 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 03:35:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by anoxia.adamw.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 18217b5b TLS version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 20:34:55 -0700 (MST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\)) Subject: Re: Libsrs2: Link Fail From: Adam Weinberger In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 20:34:53 -0700 Cc: "freebsd-ports@freebsd.org" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: Larry Rosenman X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 03:35:04 -0000 > On 8 Mar, 2017, at 20:23, Larry Rosenman wrote: >=20 > = http://home.lerctr.org:8888/data/p110amd64-host-ports/2017-03-08_21h18m13s= /logs/errors/libsrs2-1.0.18_3.log >=20 >=20 >=20 > cc -shared srs2.lo sha1.lo -Wl,-soname -Wl,libsrs2.so.0 -o = .libs/libsrs2.so.0.0.0 >=20 > /usr/bin/ld: sha1.lo: relocation R_X86_64_PC32 against = `__stack_chk_guard@@FBSD_1.0' can not be used when making a shared = object; recompile with -fPIC >=20 > /usr/bin/ld: final link failed: Bad value >=20 > cc: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see = invocation) >=20 > *** [libsrs2.la] Error code 1 >=20 >=20 >=20 > make[3]: stopped in = /wrkdirs/usr/ports/mail/libsrs2/work/libsrs2-1.0.18/libsrs2 >=20 > 1 error >=20 >=20 >=20 > make[3]: stopped in = /wrkdirs/usr/ports/mail/libsrs2/work/libsrs2-1.0.18/libsrs2 >=20 > *** [all-recursive] Error code 1 >=20 >=20 >=20 > make[2]: stopped in = /wrkdirs/usr/ports/mail/libsrs2/work/libsrs2-1.0.18 >=20 > 1 error >=20 >=20 >=20 > make[2]: stopped in = /wrkdirs/usr/ports/mail/libsrs2/work/libsrs2-1.0.18 >=20 > *** [all-recursive-am] Error code 2 >=20 >=20 >=20 > make[1]: stopped in = /wrkdirs/usr/ports/mail/libsrs2/work/libsrs2-1.0.18 >=20 > 1 error >=20 >=20 >=20 > make[1]: stopped in = /wrkdirs/usr/ports/mail/libsrs2/work/libsrs2-1.0.18 Does it compile with -fPIC? # Adam --=20 Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Mar 9 04:22:03 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C2A1D03475 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 04:22:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from mail.infocus-llc.com (mail.infocus-llc.com [199.15.120.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A5BA175E for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 04:22:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fullermd@over-yonder.net) Received: from draco.over-yonder.net (c-75-65-60-66.hsd1.ms.comcast.net [75.65.60.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.tarragon.infocus-llc.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3vdy042xbmzvr; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 22:21:56 -0600 (CST) Received: by draco.over-yonder.net (Postfix, from userid 100) id 3vdy035TFXz3SK; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 22:21:55 -0600 (CST) Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 22:21:55 -0600 From: "Matthew D. Fuller" To: Bob Willcox Cc: Kevin Oberman , Freddie Cash , ports list Subject: Re: Best way to cause synth to ignore rebuilding of a port?? Message-ID: <20170309042155.GE49602@over-yonder.net> References: <20170308160420.GG22199@rancor.immure.com> <20170308195705.GI22199@rancor.immure.com> <20170308211337.GJ22199@rancor.immure.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170308211337.GJ22199@rancor.immure.com> X-Editor: vi X-OS: FreeBSD User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 04:22:03 -0000 On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 03:13:37PM -0600 I heard the voice of Bob Willcox, and lo! it spake thus: > > Hmm, the plugin/addon I use and would be lost without is for tab > groups. Do they still work in 52? I'm pretty sure it's 57 (or 58?) that they're getting broken. Certainly they work fine here on the current 52 out of ports. -- Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Mar 9 04:47:32 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F215ED03258 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 04:47:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0C579E3 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 04:47:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D0141D03257; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 04:47:32 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFBA9D03256 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 04:47:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: from mail-oi0-x231.google.com (mail-oi0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c06::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 950A29E2 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 04:47:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kob6558@gmail.com) Received: by mail-oi0-x231.google.com with SMTP id 62so31047784oih.2 for ; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 20:47:32 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=1xpsBtoP2GiKinus4MBopBWhmG5uve4PLh13JqR0dBI=; b=bMdABrQTJGO2g3qTUw+BRzjTKFaJZ34rwNdzGkjaUaIJHt3fnYUxk7o9MZPQyck6OC QVOOwsExfMwdGYLlJ+jy3YXtZKnlCjOdoik4wCIAwITjJ4byrGcD58Bu93JqLQbAXhOT b2B+dtpPEPcdjtnU/Ne2qjTtvVV6TYCqungQL5Hj2bMViR3XdG0T30u+SwolQLokrdIk Bjgy1XCay28hVbynHVIrdx6T4meDgyQJp8WlIe5uzYnxrdIciEWnjkJ9M2UYb3KxDgaY 2L1zVR1tVIkw1JFR5YIGOECOHQJOkXp4UOJ5xEgURI6nj85asYM3dQPIezChRAL+03+9 lmEg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=1xpsBtoP2GiKinus4MBopBWhmG5uve4PLh13JqR0dBI=; b=XpjvzyCGzB+rtUEf11IFozSd5t/3YkJizqc7IeqMGgXHWNBygzuhldQNLHEO5go96g kz3J6BFUgoHnBeD33j9QKFKcT2U9cuW0xelPoAHoTycOCnSRyhu8bL0sF7oidrjSkBAf vRuE4BhPDOzC1KVPO6OXk24ns0W5HBCcZAvJ6mMb8O1mS/7OmRUVzYLswIwVFPhPcvVm tboMyWJB1KsTg5E4nL5tRT6BlhrqBuNUILKfCYt8KgyJlBEdtKhDKvavP7JtCx3qpqmQ n2PkhT01CXAm6hRFEZdH5rHXoU9IGFn3DEkOQqHUgDct7qSnhKu89hi7E3/1+B10lXGn hLBg== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39lGD9zhMTHBX8Fsx05V6s81yqR0UbPdS8WoYyBnkWS4gpiKp1Bit02ZOXKw4Zl3/6/mNxVPF7CFALCQ8g== X-Received: by 10.202.217.215 with SMTP id q206mr5865076oig.92.1489034851877; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 20:47:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.74.32.79 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 20:47:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> From: Kevin Oberman Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2017 20:47:31 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: NFZniszwKqFwp2F8QmWBxcKW-p4 Message-ID: Subject: Re: manpath change for ports ? To: scratch65535@att.net Cc: freebsd-ports Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 04:47:33 -0000 On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 12:35 PM, wrote: > On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 00:56:10 +0100, Baptiste Daroussin > wrote: > > >Hi all, > > > >I would like to propose a change in the localbase hier for ports > > > >I think we should add /usr/local/share/man in the manpath along with at > first > >and maybe instead of in long term. > > > >The reason is: > >- /usr/local/share/man seems more consistent to me with base which have: > > /usr/share/man > >- It will remove lots of patches from the ports tree where were we need > to patch > > upstream build system to install in a non usual path. > > > >My proposal is to add to the manpath /usr/local/share/man in default > man(1) > >command in FreeBSD 12 (MFCed to 11-STABLE) > > > >and either provide an errata for 11.0/10.3 or a > >/usr/local/etc/man.d/something.conf via a port or something like that > for those > >two, what do you think? > > > >For the same reason I would like to allow porters to stop patching (with > pathfix > >or anything else) the path for pkgconfig files and allow > >/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig along with the current > >/usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig:/usr/libdata/pkgconfig > > > >Which will also remove tons of hacks from the ports tree. > > > >What do you think? > > > >Best regards, > >Bapt > > I would argue that the same principle should be followed with > *everything*: if it's at or applies to the application level, it > should be in /usr/local/, no exceptions. > > And if that conflicts with the native product documentation (e.g. > MySQL, MariaDB), the local mods should be right up at the top of > the relevant man page, not on some special web site or in some > special documentation hiding in the weeds somewhere. Nobody > should have to chase down necessary information; if the man pages > are the canonical documentation, then all the facts should be on > the man page. > > And if something is not at the application level, then perhaps > this is the right time and place to have a conversation about > whether there should be a separate subtree for the layer between > the apps and the kernel, too. > > The desire for long-term stability, predictability, and freedom > from bugs is not a joke or a wish for a pony. It's a basic > sine-qua-non necessity for production-quality software, > especially servers. Would splitting off the middle layer from > the kernel help or hinder that goal? The question must be worth > a conversation, and the sooner the better. > Wait a second! I don't think Bapt or anyone else was suggesting that ports install in any part of the tree other than /usr/local. Tr-read what he said. The discussion is whether to move from /usr/local/man to /usr/local/share/man as well as other directories that normally in /usr/[share|info||libexe] under Linux systems. -- Kevin Oberman, Part time kid herder and retired Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com PGP Fingerprint: D03FB98AFA78E3B78C1694B318AB39EF1B055683 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Mar 9 06:13:32 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E6FBD0446F; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 06:13:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from umasomasu@gmail.com) Received: from mail-qk0-x236.google.com (mail-qk0-x236.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::236]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E162D1D9E; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 06:13:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from umasomasu@gmail.com) Received: by mail-qk0-x236.google.com with SMTP id y76so104581263qkb.0; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 22:13:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=JEilstVGgE0cWwnOGO9TDw8HXRVxfAmPsf5YQP/OQVY=; b=hlRIn4CLTcmfDSV8wYTsLH/bvSFYXpmcyfCB3DsgQL66EZMo2ffMbdemwyX5RMIiI1 E/T6l+Zi4tnyrQyzZKjykhSvmGJ7IGk2HWXyIpArJgkT7rSGuUedOuDTjDfjBhEoLbzx 2VCvuZQtD3O+gnIXv04igG6zRFPJkDakWZqsmE0T3vL2c+7cBP1Cc4IoDx3TGAgaPmEq c5sbUuHbTZa9Yy2nTRf2tLoqmDzryn7qL/DN+BU3idqECSTMbym4YI/qWebaWtHqWZEo HYdC7WiyZLkwuFoxid2v/xWhHJB1UKtZ+RKmXhPrMKxnr23iejrTbi3RAk//zggwRE8F 5zkA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=JEilstVGgE0cWwnOGO9TDw8HXRVxfAmPsf5YQP/OQVY=; b=c4L2LUBWj1zYe0N37/bWtBDyMTy5HPe7r6Srb7omEaphhDRxen55eSGgBNN436h/Ld cAbXaEJ7Lf9Ehy237V2PuXSf/hIPrE7TIUI2eASek5ljctbe07m7Bfoav0Ta+851HpOx roSDBhdk+nH6bPgwU/+6arVJE+V3BO2sNzl3vafEOBHCc9ZCJjrWe16O5Odw2/YNix6j cVELAs8gnk/H55YFmQ5BMDv67wJEovG9oJMLCgiD6hsfI1T2Y4D7Z7FUmCMiMw7z5nGp greUMkoIK6CH4kH9sNCcyhNfGaaBFOfT9LDZ4XtzWqPMKWwPhgmJC5MSOmoRbikDjTYn jLiQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39k49hj+3QxB+/RjrkL/IlDxE1nrgFUzc1JgTexonuddL89I0hJHTZ6JX/xSwhT6V0ZTTvMA656UChB9NQ== X-Received: by 10.55.88.66 with SMTP id m63mr12402695qkb.270.1489040011024; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 22:13:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.237.63.109 with HTTP; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 22:13:30 -0800 (PST) From: Uma Somasundaram Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:43:30 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Issue with re-installation of bash and Sudo ... To: gecko@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 06:13:32 -0000 Hi , I have upgraded FF version from : 24.3.0_2,1 -> 45.6.0_3,1 in Free BSD 9.2 version, How do I reinstall the Sudo or bash? which I lost after the Browser upgrade , While adding the package Iam getting below error , " >bash Shared object "libiconv.so.3" not found, required by "bash" > pkg_add -r sudo Error: Unable to get ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-9.2-release/Latest/sudo.tbz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access) pkg_add: unable to fetch ' ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-9.2-release/Latest/sudo.tbz' by URL > pkg_add -r bash Error: "Unable to get ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-9.2-release/Latest/bash.tbz: File unavailable (e.g., file not found, no access)" pkg_add: unable to fetch ' ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/packages-9.2-release/Latest/bash.tbz' by URL " Please do let me know how to fix it?. Output from 'uname -a' : >FreeBSD pod1201-client11.ibesa 9.2-RELEASE FreeBSD 9.2-RELEASE #0 r255898: Fri Sep 27 03:52:52 UTC 2013 root@bake.isc.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC i386 Output from 'ident /usr/ports/www/firefox/Makefile' : >/usr/ports/www/firefox/Makefile: $FreeBSD: head/www/firefox/Makefile 433286 2017-02-04 07:56:59Z jbeich Thanks & Regards, Uma From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Mar 9 07:05:10 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1937D04682 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 07:05:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from graham@menhennitt.com.au) Received: from homiemail-a69.g.dreamhost.com (sub5.mail.dreamhost.com [208.113.200.129]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 919561E8B for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 07:05:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from graham@menhennitt.com.au) Received: from homiemail-a69.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a69.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7CC9C48000B35 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 23:05:03 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=menhennitt.com.au; h= subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type; s=menhennitt.com.au; bh=dQmMRThQ0Ajuz 5y0Y6erhC/JRvM=; b=OLBug4oQQIgl5lKVITKefrBFVwUyfQDdm70cnuTaTOe9E XSNt30K7iKqDjNt63SkUJIUfHLpnhhSNMUBAdzJwBnJ5PcKbEDSoQTTfMI85sxKr UU5irwmTqydRGUHMkJYHMlizjF/+OAmFpC8TIXw2e/cAOyKJEzSFRbRV+t5NIY= Received: from [203.2.73.68] (c122-107-214-88.mckinn3.vic.optusnet.com.au [122.107.214.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: graham@menhennitt.com.au) by homiemail-a69.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 15C4848000B33 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 23:05:02 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: linker errors for OpenGL functions (solved) To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <99eb9add-a30b-0445-2f64-8b801d9072db@menhennitt.com.au> <58d6ed8f-5ca0-d7b9-4683-ff3db5ce98c6@menhennitt.com.au> From: Graham Menhennitt Message-ID: Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:05:01 +1100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <58d6ed8f-5ca0-d7b9-4683-ff3db5ce98c6@menhennitt.com.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 07:05:10 -0000 On 07/03/2017 08:38, Graham Menhennitt wrote: > On 6/03/2017 11:29 AM, Kevin Oberman wrote: >> On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 12:14 PM, Graham Menhennitt >> > >>> I've screwed up something on my system. When I try to build the >>> x11/kde4-workspace port, I get a pile of linker errors. I'm guessing >>> that I >>> just need to reinstall some other OpenGL port, but I can't find out >>> which >>> one. Any clues, please? >>> > I'll try reinstalling some more ports. > > Well, I've fixed it by reinstalling a number of ports. I'm not sure which one actually did the job, but I've reinstalled: graphics/dri x11/nvidia-driver graphics/qt4-opengl graphics/gle graphics/prison Graham From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Mar 9 08:08:11 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2F16D0471B for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 08:08:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FFE91BFE for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 08:08:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 9F5A8D04719; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 08:08:11 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D5F5D04717 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 08:08:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (portscout.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90C781BFD for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 08:08:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v2988Bqr010467 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 08:08:11 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v2988BYf010466; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 08:08:11 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201703090808.v2988BYf010466@portscout.ysv.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.ysv.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 08:08:11 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 08:08:11 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ graphics/opencollada | 1.6.37 | v1.6.43 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Mar 9 08:29:55 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F5C0D04DE7 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 08:29:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D0C58CF for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 08:29:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 08F3CD04DE5; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 08:29:55 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 083FDD04DE3; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 08:29:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3BB48CD; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 08:29:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from desk.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 255255366; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 08:29:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: by desk.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0696670C1; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 09:29:42 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Tijl Coosemans Cc: Baptiste Daroussin , ports@FreeBSD.org, arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: manpath change for ports ? References: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> <86mvcvojzt.fsf@desk.des.no> <20170308204126.6d152c44@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 09:29:42 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20170308204126.6d152c44@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> (Tijl Coosemans's message of "Wed, 8 Mar 2017 20:41:26 +0100") Message-ID: <861su6ont5.fsf@desk.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 08:29:55 -0000 Tijl Coosemans writes: > If you want to run a program from its build directory and the program > links to a library also in the build directory then you have to run the > program with LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable set to the build > directory. Or, you could link the program with -rpath , but > then you should relink it before installation. It's one of the things > libtool takes care of automatically. > > If this is the problem you have then it has nothing to do with gcc. If > you're not using libtool then your program probably does not have any > rpath or runpath so it falls back on rtld/ldconfig which may find it in > /usr/local/lib. You are correct in theory, but I am using libtool and it doesn't work. Here's a series of emails I wrote to the maintainer a little over six months ago explaining the problem: 1) | I discovered that lang/gcc48 (and presumably the other gcc ports as | well) not only have /usr/local/include in their default include path, | but actually place it ahead of /usr/include. This is causing me no end | of grief with software that uses iconv, because GNU libiconv's | f*s up your namespace so the build fails unless you explicitly link with | GNU libiconv instead of using the libc version. [...] 2) | [...] I realized over the weekend that the | situation is even worse than I initially thought. Basically, ports gcc | is unusable for any other purpose than to build ports which don't | support clang. Let me explain with a hypothetical scenario: |=20 | You are developing a library which is important enough that you need to | have the stable version installed on your development system. It is | installed in /usr/local as usual. You've been working on fixing a bug, | and have written a unit test which exercises the relevant code and | verified that it can deterministically trigger the bug. You fix the bug | and 'make check' again, all green. Then you clean out your working | copy, re-run configure with CC=3Dgcc and 'make check' again. Your tests | fail. |=20 | What happened is that when you built your code with gcc, the tests were | linked and run with the stable version of the library, where the bug is | not fixed. You can build with LDFLAGS=3D-L$(top_builddir)/lib, you can | even specify the full path to the library in LDADD for each individual | test, it doesn't matter. It will *always* pick the installed version | first. The only way to get your tests to pass is to not have the | library installed. |=20 | Real-world example - a 10.3 system with upstream OpenPAM installed | because it uses OpenPAM's OATH implementation: |=20 | with base clang: |=20 | des@desk ~/src/openpam/trunk% libtool exec ldd ./t/t_openpam_dispatch | /home/des/src/openpam/trunk/t/.libs/t_openpam_dispatch: | libpam.so.2 =3D> /home/des/src/openpam/trunk/lib/libpam/.libs/libpam.so.= 2 (0x800822000) | liboath.so.2 =3D> /home/des/src/openpam/trunk/lib/liboath/.libs/liboath.= so.2 (0x800a34000) | libcrypto.so.7 =3D> /lib/libcrypto.so.7 (0x800c39000) | libc.so.7 =3D> /lib/libc.so.7 (0x80102f000) |=20 | with lang/gcc: |=20 | des@desk ~/src/openpam/trunk% pkg which =3Dgcc | /usr/local/bin/gcc was installed by package gcc-4.8.5_2 | des@desk ~/src/openpam/trunk% libtool exec ldd ./t/t_openpam_dispatch | /home/des/src/openpam/trunk/t/.libs/t_openpam_dispatch: | libpam.so.2 =3D> /usr/local/lib/libpam.so.2 (0x800822000) | liboath.so.2 =3D> /usr/local/lib/liboath.so.2 (0x800a34000) | libcrypto.so.7 =3D> /lib/libcrypto.so.7 (0x800c39000) | libc.so.7 =3D> /lib/libc.so.7 (0x80102f000) | libcrypto.so.8 =3D> /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.8 (0x8013dc000) | libthr.so.3 =3D> /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x8017e9000) |=20 | (and don't ask me why the gcc version is linked with two different | versions of libcrypto!) 3) | I honestly thought this was a recent change, but I realize now that the | recent change is that I switched from developing on systems that still | had gcc in base (without /usr/local in the search path) to systems that | don't, and therefore use gcc from ports. |=20 | The correct solution, in my opinion, is to remove /usr/local from all | search paths. There is no need for it, even for ports, because most | ports add /usr/local to CPPFLAGS and LDFLAGS, either explicitly or | implicitly (by passing --prefix=3D${LOCALBASE} to the configure script). | If there are gcc-only ports which *don't* do it, they can easily be | fixed. |=20 | I initially thought that merely changing the library search order would | be sufficient, but apparently gcc somehow forces /usr/local/lib to take | precedence even over ${LD_LIBRARY_PATH}, which is what causes my unit | tests to fail. Here is an example from another project where I modified | the libtool wrapper to show its environment and run ldd before executing | the binary: |=20 | des@desk ~/src/cryb-to% ./t/t_core | PATH=3D/home/des/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/b= in:/sbin | LD_LIBRARY_PATH=3D/home/des/src/cryb-to/lib/test/.libs:/home/des/src/cryb= -to/lib/core/.libs | /home/des/src/cryb-to/t/.libs/t_core: | libcryb-test.so.0 =3D> /usr/local/lib/libcryb-test.so.0 (0x80081f000) | libcryb-core.so.0 =3D> /usr/local/lib/libcryb-core.so.0 (0x800a26000) | libc.so.7 =3D> /lib/libc.so.7 (0x800c2a000) | 1..2 | not ok 1 - version | ok 2 - no memory leaked |=20 | This is a skeleton test which only verifies that the library it's linked | with has the same version as the one it was compiled with. Here's the | same test, with the same modifications, built with clang: |=20 | des@desk ~/src/cryb-to% ./t/t_core=20=20 | PATH=3D/home/des/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/b= in:/sbin | LD_LIBRARY_PATH=3D/home/des/src/cryb-to/lib/test/.libs:/home/des/src/cryb= -to/lib/core/.libs | /home/des/src/cryb-to/t/.libs/t_core: | libcryb-test.so.0 =3D> /home/des/src/cryb-to/lib/test/.libs/libcryb-test= .so.0 (0x80081f000) | libcryb-core.so.0 =3D> /home/des/src/cryb-to/lib/core/.libs/libcryb-core= .so.0 (0x800a27000) | libc.so.7 =3D> /lib/libc.so.7 (0x800c2c000) | 1..2 | ok 1 - version | ok 2 - no memory leaked |=20 | Please understand that the *only* way I can think of to work around this | is to set --nostdinc and --nostdlib and explicitly pass the correct | search path and list of libraries (-lgcc -lc) to gcc, and even then I'm | not sure it would work. I don't find that reasonable at all. |=20 | Note that I am not sure whether this problem is limited to gcc or if ld | is also involved. The iconv problem which I originally reported is | caused by gcc picking up iconv.h from /usr/local/include instead of over | /usr/include, but I'm not sure whether the linking problem is caused by | gcc passing its search path on to ld, or to ld having its own incorrect | search path. I tried explicitly setting LD=3D/usr/bin/ld, but that | doesn't make any difference since libtool uses gcc as a linker instead | of calling ${LD} directly. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Mar 9 08:32:37 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95E9BD04064 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 08:32:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8529FD1C for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 08:32:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 84809D04062; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 08:32:37 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8416AD04060; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 08:32:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50F1BD1A; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 08:32:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from desk.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7D6D5380; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 08:32:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by desk.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id CBF2D70C4; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 09:32:36 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: jbeich@freebsd.org (Jan Beich) Cc: bapt@FreeBSD.org, arch@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: manpath change for ports ? References: <20170308190351.23C5470F2@freefall.freebsd.org> Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 09:32:36 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20170308190351.23C5470F2@freefall.freebsd.org> (Jan Beich's message of "Wed, 8 Mar 2017 19:03:51 +0000 (UTC)") Message-ID: <86wpbyn93v.fsf@desk.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 08:32:37 -0000 jbeich@freebsd.org (Jan Beich) writes: > /usr/local is *the* default location according to GNU[1] and reinforced > by FHS[2] which want it "safe from being overwritten when the system > software is updated". Not on FreeBSD where site-local stuff like your > example above and ports/packages trample on each other. NetBSD avoided > the issue by moving /usr/local to /usr/pkg. All correct, but I don't really see the relevance... DE --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Mar 9 10:58:27 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B4ED3D04954 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 10:58:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from smtp208.alice.it (smtp208.alice.it [82.57.200.104]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C6508CE for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 10:58:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (82.52.25.226) by smtp208.alice.it (8.6.060.28) (authenticated as acanedi@alice.it) id 588F4293076AC98C; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:58:23 +0100 Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v29AwHNP038283; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:58:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) X-Authentication-Warning: soth.ventu: Host alamar.local.netfence.it [10.1.2.18] claimed to be alamar.ventu Subject: Re: Writing a port that simply installs a bunch of files To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: Michael Gmelin References: <66d50818-f00e-9033-4c93-f159c38d04ba@netfence.it> <32660472-60AF-47C0-861C-023BAFC39C3D@grem.de> <5e3354dc-b597-7622-dbae-07d4119d1b7a@netfence.it> <20170306165104.51c4f071@bsd64.grem.de> <20170306170505.7e043310@bsd64.grem.de> <03dbd850-c6d5-f7e9-9b6a-41e38da5b485@netfence.it> From: Andrea Venturoli Message-ID: <3e2f217d-f853-4e37-c103-d0b5501520bc@netfence.it> Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:58:17 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD i386; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <03dbd850-c6d5-f7e9-9b6a-41e38da5b485@netfence.it> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 10:58:27 -0000 On 03/06/17 17:45, Andrea Venturoli wrote: >> post-install: >> @${TAR} -xf ${FILESDIR}/input.tgz -C ${STAGEDIR} >> @${FIND} ${STAGEDIR} -type f | \ >> ${SED} "s|^${STAGEDIR}||" >> ${TMPPLIST} >> >> .include > > Guess this is what I was looking for (just the ${TAR} part)... basically > overriding the "extract" phase. > I modified ${STAGEDIR} to ${STAGEDIR}/${PREFIX}. That should be "${STAGEDIR}${PREFIX}", anyway. Now files have correct permissions, owner and group in ${STAGEDIR}; however the group is lost in ${PREFIX} after "make install". Is specifying "@group" in pkg-plist the only way to keep that? bye & Thanks av. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Mar 9 11:16:32 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92EDED04FFE for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:16:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scratch65535@att.net) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75119112A for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:16:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scratch65535@att.net) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 7467DD04FFD; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:16:32 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 740C5D04FFC for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:16:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scratch65535@att.net) Received: from nm4-vm1.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com (nm4-vm1.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com [216.39.63.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 514371129 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:16:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from scratch65535@att.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=att.net; s=s1024; t=1489058088; bh=XHBtHwHEPBZ2P8az2ttgxI1P/ER7UMfx5DGQe8DFzr8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From:Subject; b=y/A4J6c93KiJqzjuPNik/WvkPbaIZrg+fJ2SWheBlsiM+JwbM7FZFUCmLkoV9pbrsShHsUYcdxn5y4q/bdIXsLDrPrKLnLk2K9xKfFZqAguIrtdh4a2drLGMqljb+Iwsp5PJ73ufe9a1e6Vk9iRROuQhVBhbYyC8iR0npK7BppM= Received: from [216.39.60.167] by nm4.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Mar 2017 11:14:48 -0000 Received: from [67.195.22.117] by tm3.access.bullet.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Mar 2017 11:14:48 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp112.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 09 Mar 2017 11:14:48 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 552061.23878.bm@smtp112.sbc.mail.gq1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: zBrNg28VM1k6UTxEfTBmD0RUPof6qi3QnopsFhRCyvs52Zb jb_du_PI5SPh2lhCq10msa2k8iefPsoy6XOKt.BByqphnhr1FLackGDs_kn9 yfNB5XAEodC5Sh_SnzZcVywK1707asFPxr2WnTjAREu5tglmAYtTi9XLhxzH LVgpbbhAnjUEgNxV0sQOxHQIqNteYLqIZzg6HQaQnEqXr6jzmKTRZIQFhS9E LGcPB9xvsE64fLSP_j2KARLp8nWUp_ZlhH.kZu8lCXtaP58WEpc1VxHyWIp8 w0ULzKvVNHyiI8LTkr9HmK._ZSKitGQD4vgh.bh8ZNdpESxNVxbHg7tkf8gM ZAdlozsqgSD7vfyMxiv1fWPLI7Ap5s9b2EVfr1DwiKSVGFn9Y4tc1qP7uEtd LbhXSsmhNXShxoUdojjfqJCmOtB9os3pKeE_xnxOEeYcD0JtYBdnfQ7laz7W JGaOo.qNBwI978e5Rm98iQ9KckrGYC.wl0WzQbz.NqtLLADUF9zQ.yRlWZ_d wgNG0aLnakbqXSNi5ji.LjapOwKru8mlXmu3pRsXw6Pdms9Kt_nJu.34YpqW InTCLuGLVbbuz9ZwQNiDLIA-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: pPvqnOaswBBbYZLVYFzvU7GaowLcbNioPp.aF8KvOjZk From: To: Kevin Oberman Cc: freebsd-ports Subject: Re: manpath change for ports ? Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 06:14:47 -0500 Message-ID: <92a2ccpc9tpangcsn51svvh81tql4l822s@4ax.com> References: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 11:16:32 -0000 On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 20:47:31 -0800, Kevin Oberman wrote: >On Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 12:35 PM, wrote: > >> On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 00:56:10 +0100, Baptiste Daroussin >> wrote: >> >> >Hi all, >> > >> >I would like to propose a change in the localbase hier for ports >> > >> >I think we should add /usr/local/share/man in the manpath along with at >> first >> >and maybe instead of in long term. >> > >> >The reason is: >> >- /usr/local/share/man seems more consistent to me with base which have: >> > /usr/share/man >> >- It will remove lots of patches from the ports tree where were we need >> to patch >> > upstream build system to install in a non usual path. >> > >> >My proposal is to add to the manpath /usr/local/share/man in default >> man(1) >> >command in FreeBSD 12 (MFCed to 11-STABLE) >> > >> >and either provide an errata for 11.0/10.3 or a >> >/usr/local/etc/man.d/something.conf via a port or something like that >> for those >> >two, what do you think? >> > >> >For the same reason I would like to allow porters to stop patching (with >> pathfix >> >or anything else) the path for pkgconfig files and allow >> >/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig along with the current >> >/usr/local/libdata/pkgconfig:/usr/libdata/pkgconfig >> > >> >Which will also remove tons of hacks from the ports tree. >> > >> >What do you think? >> > >> >Best regards, >> >Bapt >> >> I would argue that the same principle should be followed with >> *everything*: if it's at or applies to the application level, it >> should be in /usr/local/, no exceptions. >> >> And if that conflicts with the native product documentation (e.g. >> MySQL, MariaDB), the local mods should be right up at the top of >> the relevant man page, not on some special web site or in some >> special documentation hiding in the weeds somewhere. Nobody >> should have to chase down necessary information; if the man pages >> are the canonical documentation, then all the facts should be on >> the man page. >> >> And if something is not at the application level, then perhaps >> this is the right time and place to have a conversation about >> whether there should be a separate subtree for the layer between >> the apps and the kernel, too. >> >> The desire for long-term stability, predictability, and freedom >> from bugs is not a joke or a wish for a pony. It's a basic >> sine-qua-non necessity for production-quality software, >> especially servers. Would splitting off the middle layer from >> the kernel help or hinder that goal? The question must be worth >> a conversation, and the sooner the better. >> > >Wait a second! I don't think Bapt or anyone else was suggesting that ports >install in any part of the tree other than /usr/local. Tr-read what he said. > >The discussion is whether to move from /usr/local/man to >/usr/local/share/man as well as other directories that normally in >/usr/[share|info||libexe] under Linux systems. I wasn't suggesting that Bapt or anyone was suggesting that, honest. I'm only arguing for greater consistency and simplicity than is now the case. Anyone who looks at fbsd (unix) from a human-factors standpoint sees an incoherent picture made up of the (joking-but-not- really-funny) "a phd hack, three master's theses, and a thousand undergraduate term projects". It lacks integrity and simplicity, and consequently is needlessly hard to use, hard to maintain, hard to love, and impossible to promote to the larger world. We shouldn't be doing *anything* for the sake of consistency with linux. No change should be made for any reason other than the result would be obviously *better* from a human-factors standpoint. If that means we steal some stuff from linux, fine. But doing anything for the sake of being "more like linux" is barking nuts! Linux is already as much like linux as anything can be, so if our only goal is to make fbsd "more like linux", then let's just grab a copy of some linux distro and call it fbsd. Voila!, instant 100% linux compatibility with 99.999% less work. Everyone could relax! But that would be a going-out-of-business strategy, and I'm certainly not suggesting it seriously. What we should be doing for real is moving toward *replacing* linux AND windows. Make *them* go obsolete by becoming less-obnoxious and more understandable. We're already sturdier. And a nice first step would be to start cleaning up the craziness in the tree by moving *all* the apps-layer stuff to /usr/local. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Mar 9 11:23:34 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FBC3D04216 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:23:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk [IPv6:2001:8b0:151:1:c4ea:bd49:619b:6cb3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk", Issuer "infracaninophile.co.uk" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2E3C3157C for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:23:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from matthew@FreeBSD.org) Received: from zero-gravitas.local (unknown [85.199.232.226]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: m.seaman@infracaninophile.co.uk) by smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7C80BE358 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:23:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk; dmarc=none header.from=FreeBSD.org Authentication-Results: smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk/7C80BE358; dkim=none; dkim-atps=neutral Subject: Re: Writing a port that simply installs a bunch of files To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <66d50818-f00e-9033-4c93-f159c38d04ba@netfence.it> <32660472-60AF-47C0-861C-023BAFC39C3D@grem.de> <5e3354dc-b597-7622-dbae-07d4119d1b7a@netfence.it> <20170306165104.51c4f071@bsd64.grem.de> <20170306170505.7e043310@bsd64.grem.de> <03dbd850-c6d5-f7e9-9b6a-41e38da5b485@netfence.it> <3e2f217d-f853-4e37-c103-d0b5501520bc@netfence.it> From: Matthew Seaman Message-ID: Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:23:20 +0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <3e2f217d-f853-4e37-c103-d0b5501520bc@netfence.it> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="e4meIWv86e7oJcN2Me32FUwsGhOcFg8XQ" X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL, RDNS_NONE,SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on smtp.infracaninophile.co.uk X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 11:23:34 -0000 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --e4meIWv86e7oJcN2Me32FUwsGhOcFg8XQ Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="KJ0rnuXDVDFKkdpGa2NT0kkSAB5ulXlDE"; protected-headers="v1" From: Matthew Seaman To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Message-ID: Subject: Re: Writing a port that simply installs a bunch of files References: <66d50818-f00e-9033-4c93-f159c38d04ba@netfence.it> <32660472-60AF-47C0-861C-023BAFC39C3D@grem.de> <5e3354dc-b597-7622-dbae-07d4119d1b7a@netfence.it> <20170306165104.51c4f071@bsd64.grem.de> <20170306170505.7e043310@bsd64.grem.de> <03dbd850-c6d5-f7e9-9b6a-41e38da5b485@netfence.it> <3e2f217d-f853-4e37-c103-d0b5501520bc@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <3e2f217d-f853-4e37-c103-d0b5501520bc@netfence.it> --KJ0rnuXDVDFKkdpGa2NT0kkSAB5ulXlDE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 2017/03/09 10:58, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > Now files have correct permissions, owner and group in ${STAGEDIR}; > however the group is lost in ${PREFIX} after "make install". >=20 > Is specifying "@group" in pkg-plist the only way to keep that? Yes, you need to specify what user or group ownership and what permissions you want for files within the pkg-plist. Unless they should have the default root:wheel ownership and mode 755 for dirs and executables or 644 for data and other non-executable files. That's because the ports will build software, install it to staging and create a package from it as a non-root user. So the ownership and modes of files in staging may well be nothing like what the files should have when installed in production. With the exception that the execute permission bit setting does seem to be derived from what's in staging. If that seems annoyingly inconsistent to you, consider what it would take to update all of the pkg-plist files or equivalent port Makefile entries to explicitly set the file modes for every executable that might be installed by the ports, and to get there from here without breaking everything while that work is in progress. Cheers, Matthew --KJ0rnuXDVDFKkdpGa2NT0kkSAB5ulXlDE-- --e4meIWv86e7oJcN2Me32FUwsGhOcFg8XQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJYwTsuXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQxOUYxNTRFQ0JGMTEyRTUwNTQ0RTNGMzAw MDUxM0YxMEUwQTlFNEU3AAoJEABRPxDgqeTnsDkQAI7IWKBDpy6kGfTvrDPbUe5c +/D9goNUSVQ+l5fMuGB9Nq3/iWH1wpJD5Dq6m0YeOS3m9twHd42u6XZDBnyommpU FO1DjgjCXiAVv8M7WRGtq7V4vvSzmSxISl+kL2Y1NS7LtPUuVlnYX7usCOOS+ZDa 7dZospkCDMS9e+6nt003pJdmuX5e8X1r/oBfBsZeV3kWTi3pewWcYAOWKCVEKjFi x/mqJxDYB6NpgzoU38HsxwkGjTuKr3DNspEooDrKIp7yzBOVZyAcqkZeUvgbO/GT vJVgBDJ/DOz3pLShRK+7gQHiGOobidd6hbDHz7FgzyZeIIVDwXbHDW7/TH1IlVea HKnbF1GE0QOA6EkzaiBjdKHJyHLx347o2eIq/n6FtyPNQsAcZpO9jEh49DUGLLPf ZFHkCfuo4/Mco8hSA7PZd7CV/gi2Sg8Q5sdoWx6a2eDDBr2S0ZO8l2ngQkuMP2bo oQY+/pwEErB/BBhsumN2dCP2Ya6UM3c6N8IjKZC+0wvtvTTFDPwidO46BEYrNjpX gfH0N7eh8qQQMotYd7byI+KwSrySDpYBFB59fkkGNI5WEBx1LbV7qzY9YZpGvpUE /Z/loNV8LPtVuh6b8/opWpLNyA3cRsI+ueYNM3D6oel+1+g1T6YTsQQGq+uTX/AE ZsgVRFlrwhz2vuxaS93w =dYp5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --e4meIWv86e7oJcN2Me32FUwsGhOcFg8XQ-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Mar 9 11:35:42 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FF95D0450A for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:35:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E8A1AC9 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:35:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 327E8D04508; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:35:42 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 31B98D04506; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:35:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: from mailrelay105.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay105.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.20.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "relay.skynet.be", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 010F91AC5; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:35:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2APBQDWPMFY/0nD8VFdHAEBBAEBCgEBg?= =?us-ascii?q?1FRgRqDYIoMc5BbKQGVDoIOgmyDNgKCTEAYAQIBAQEBAQEBayiFFQEBAQECASM?= =?us-ascii?q?zIwULCxgCAgUhAgIPKh4GExuJXQywJoIminABAQEHAQEBASSBC4oyhDAkgwaCX?= =?us-ascii?q?wWVeoY/ih6IDXaBEoUjigKTPx84gQM3LAg/hlU/NYdugj0BAQE?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2APBQDWPMFY/0nD8VFdHAEBBAEBCgEBg1FRgRqDYIoMc5B?= =?us-ascii?q?bKQGVDoIOgmyDNgKCTEAYAQIBAQEBAQEBayiFFQEBAQECASMzIwULCxgCAgUhA?= =?us-ascii?q?gIPKh4GExuJXQywJoIminABAQEHAQEBASSBC4oyhDAkgwaCXwWVeoY/ih6IDXa?= =?us-ascii?q?BEoUjigKTPx84gQM3LAg/hlU/NYdugj0BAQE?= Received: from 73.195-241-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([81.241.195.73]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 09 Mar 2017 12:35:34 +0100 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v29BZXjw088655; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 12:35:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 12:35:32 +0100 From: Tijl Coosemans To: Dag-Erling =?UTF-8?B?U23DuHJncmF2?= Cc: Baptiste Daroussin , ports@FreeBSD.org, arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: manpath change for ports ? Message-ID: <20170309123532.09b87366@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <861su6ont5.fsf@desk.des.no> References: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> <86mvcvojzt.fsf@desk.des.no> <20170308204126.6d152c44@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <861su6ont5.fsf@desk.des.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 11:35:42 -0000 On Thu, 09 Mar 2017 09:29:42 +0100 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav wr= ote: > Tijl Coosemans writes: >> If you want to run a program from its build directory and the program >> links to a library also in the build directory then you have to run the >> program with LD_LIBRARY_PATH environment variable set to the build >> directory. Or, you could link the program with -rpath , but >> then you should relink it before installation. It's one of the things >> libtool takes care of automatically. >> >> If this is the problem you have then it has nothing to do with gcc. If >> you're not using libtool then your program probably does not have any >> rpath or runpath so it falls back on rtld/ldconfig which may find it in >> /usr/local/lib. =20 >=20 > You are correct in theory, but I am using libtool and it doesn't work. >=20 > Here's a series of emails I wrote to the maintainer a little over six > months ago explaining the problem: >=20 > 1) >=20 > | I discovered that lang/gcc48 (and presumably the other gcc ports as > | well) not only have /usr/local/include in their default include path, > | but actually place it ahead of /usr/include. This is causing me no end > | of grief with software that uses iconv, because GNU libiconv's > | f*s up your namespace so the build fails unless you explicitly link with > | GNU libiconv instead of using the libc version. [...] Right, to use libc iconv(3) with -I/usr/local/include and GNU libiconv installed you have to compile with -DLIBICONV_PLUG. > 2) >=20 > | [...] I realized over the weekend that the > | situation is even worse than I initially thought. Basically, ports gcc > | is unusable for any other purpose than to build ports which don't > | support clang. Let me explain with a hypothetical scenario: > |=20 > | You are developing a library which is important enough that you need to > | have the stable version installed on your development system. It is > | installed in /usr/local as usual. You've been working on fixing a bug, > | and have written a unit test which exercises the relevant code and > | verified that it can deterministically trigger the bug. You fix the bug > | and 'make check' again, all green. Then you clean out your working > | copy, re-run configure with CC=3Dgcc and 'make check' again. Your tests > | fail. > |=20 > | What happened is that when you built your code with gcc, the tests were > | linked and run with the stable version of the library, where the bug is > | not fixed. You can build with LDFLAGS=3D-L$(top_builddir)/lib, you can > | even specify the full path to the library in LDADD for each individual > | test, it doesn't matter. It will *always* pick the installed version > | first. The only way to get your tests to pass is to not have the > | library installed. > |=20 > | Real-world example - a 10.3 system with upstream OpenPAM installed > | because it uses OpenPAM's OATH implementation: > |=20 > | with base clang: > |=20 > | des@desk ~/src/openpam/trunk% libtool exec ldd ./t/t_openpam_dispatch > | /home/des/src/openpam/trunk/t/.libs/t_openpam_dispatch: > | libpam.so.2 =3D> /home/des/src/openpam/trunk/lib/libpam/.libs/libpam.s= o.2 (0x800822000) > | liboath.so.2 =3D> /home/des/src/openpam/trunk/lib/liboath/.libs/liboat= h.so.2 (0x800a34000) > | libcrypto.so.7 =3D> /lib/libcrypto.so.7 (0x800c39000) > | libc.so.7 =3D> /lib/libc.so.7 (0x80102f000) > |=20 > | with lang/gcc: > |=20 > | des@desk ~/src/openpam/trunk% pkg which =3Dgcc > | /usr/local/bin/gcc was installed by package gcc-4.8.5_2 > | des@desk ~/src/openpam/trunk% libtool exec ldd ./t/t_openpam_dispatch > | /home/des/src/openpam/trunk/t/.libs/t_openpam_dispatch: > | libpam.so.2 =3D> /usr/local/lib/libpam.so.2 (0x800822000) > | liboath.so.2 =3D> /usr/local/lib/liboath.so.2 (0x800a34000) > | libcrypto.so.7 =3D> /lib/libcrypto.so.7 (0x800c39000) > | libc.so.7 =3D> /lib/libc.so.7 (0x80102f000) > | libcrypto.so.8 =3D> /usr/local/lib/libcrypto.so.8 (0x8013dc000) > | libthr.so.3 =3D> /lib/libthr.so.3 (0x8017e9000) > |=20 > | (and don't ask me why the gcc version is linked with two different > | versions of libcrypto!) Here you can probably get things working by adding -Wl,--enable-new-dtags to LDFLAGS in the configure script (or to AM_LDFLAGS in Makefile.am). Clang runs ld(1) with this flag by default, gcc does not. With clang the program has DT_RUNPATH /usr/local/lib, which rtld(1) checks after LD_LIBRARY_PATH, and with gcc the program has DT_RPATH /usr/local/lib which rtld checks *before* LD_LIBRARY_PATH. (The gold(1) linker also enables this flag by default.) The reason it links to libcrypto twice is because liboath.so.2 pulls in libcrypto.so.7 while gcc has linked libpam with libcrypto.so.8 because of the implicit -L/usr/local/lib. > 3) >=20 > | I honestly thought this was a recent change, but I realize now that the > | recent change is that I switched from developing on systems that still > | had gcc in base (without /usr/local in the search path) to systems that > | don't, and therefore use gcc from ports. > |=20 > | The correct solution, in my opinion, is to remove /usr/local from all > | search paths. There is no need for it, even for ports, because most > | ports add /usr/local to CPPFLAGS and LDFLAGS, either explicitly or > | implicitly (by passing --prefix=3D${LOCALBASE} to the configure script). > | If there are gcc-only ports which *don't* do it, they can easily be > | fixed. I agree. > | I initially thought that merely changing the library search order would > | be sufficient, but apparently gcc somehow forces /usr/local/lib to take > | precedence even over ${LD_LIBRARY_PATH}, which is what causes my unit > | tests to fail. Here is an example from another project where I modified > | the libtool wrapper to show its environment and run ldd before executing > | the binary: > |=20 > | des@desk ~/src/cryb-to% ./t/t_core > | PATH=3D/home/des/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:= /bin:/sbin > | LD_LIBRARY_PATH=3D/home/des/src/cryb-to/lib/test/.libs:/home/des/src/cr= yb-to/lib/core/.libs > | /home/des/src/cryb-to/t/.libs/t_core: > | libcryb-test.so.0 =3D> /usr/local/lib/libcryb-test.so.0 (0x80081f000) > | libcryb-core.so.0 =3D> /usr/local/lib/libcryb-core.so.0 (0x800a26000) > | libc.so.7 =3D> /lib/libc.so.7 (0x800c2a000) > | 1..2 > | not ok 1 - version > | ok 2 - no memory leaked > |=20 > | This is a skeleton test which only verifies that the library it's linked > | with has the same version as the one it was compiled with. Here's the > | same test, with the same modifications, built with clang: > |=20 > | des@desk ~/src/cryb-to% ./t/t_core =20 > | PATH=3D/home/des/bin:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:= /bin:/sbin > | LD_LIBRARY_PATH=3D/home/des/src/cryb-to/lib/test/.libs:/home/des/src/cr= yb-to/lib/core/.libs > | /home/des/src/cryb-to/t/.libs/t_core: > | libcryb-test.so.0 =3D> /home/des/src/cryb-to/lib/test/.libs/libcryb-te= st.so.0 (0x80081f000) > | libcryb-core.so.0 =3D> /home/des/src/cryb-to/lib/core/.libs/libcryb-co= re.so.0 (0x800a27000) > | libc.so.7 =3D> /lib/libc.so.7 (0x800c2c000) > | 1..2 > | ok 1 - version > | ok 2 - no memory leaked > |=20 > | Please understand that the *only* way I can think of to work around this > | is to set --nostdinc and --nostdlib and explicitly pass the correct > | search path and list of libraries (-lgcc -lc) to gcc, and even then I'm > | not sure it would work. I don't find that reasonable at all. > |=20 > | Note that I am not sure whether this problem is limited to gcc or if ld > | is also involved. The iconv problem which I originally reported is > | caused by gcc picking up iconv.h from /usr/local/include instead of over > | /usr/include, but I'm not sure whether the linking problem is caused by > | gcc passing its search path on to ld, or to ld having its own incorrect > | search path. I tried explicitly setting LD=3D/usr/bin/ld, but that > | doesn't make any difference since libtool uses gcc as a linker instead > | of calling ${LD} directly. Note that -rpath /usr/local/lib isn't added by gcc but by libtool because it assumes rtld will not search that directory automatically. If you run './configure CC=3Dgcc --prefix=3D/usr && make check' the tests should succeed (without --enable-new-dtags) because -rpath isn't used then. You can examine rpath differences with 'objdump -p program | grep PATH'. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Mar 9 11:55:22 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26CCAD04CFF for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:55:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 148CC90C for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:55:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 10521D04CFD; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:55:22 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FC2DD04CFB; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:55:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD92D90A; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:55:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from desk.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 591AC5B80; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:55:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by desk.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 0BB7070EB; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 12:55:20 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: Tijl Coosemans Cc: Baptiste Daroussin , ports@FreeBSD.org, arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: manpath change for ports ? References: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> <86mvcvojzt.fsf@desk.des.no> <20170308204126.6d152c44@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <861su6ont5.fsf@desk.des.no> <20170309123532.09b87366@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 12:55:20 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20170309123532.09b87366@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> (Tijl Coosemans's message of "Thu, 9 Mar 2017 12:35:32 +0100") Message-ID: <86fuimmzpz.fsf@desk.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 11:55:22 -0000 Tijl Coosemans writes: > Right, to use libc iconv(3) with -I/usr/local/include and GNU libiconv > installed you have to compile with -DLIBICONV_PLUG. I didn't have -I/usr/local/include, gcc forced it on me. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Mar 9 12:29:49 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D50FCFB90F for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 12:29:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66A853DB for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 12:29:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 631B3CFB90C; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 12:29:49 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62666CFB90A; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 12:29:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from tensor.andric.com (tensor.andric.com [87.251.56.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "tensor.andric.com", Issuer "COMODO RSA Domain Validation Secure Server CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D6D513D9; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 12:29:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dim@FreeBSD.org) Received: from coleburn.avinity.tv (unknown [77.95.97.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by tensor.andric.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6FA4B2ACA3; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 13:29:38 +0100 (CET) From: Dimitry Andric Message-Id: Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_158C0438-7EB6-4369-B706-5BA4441CF800"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\)) Subject: Re: manpath change for ports ? Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 13:29:26 +0100 In-Reply-To: <861su6ont5.fsf@desk.des.no> Cc: Tijl Coosemans , ports@FreeBSD.org, arch@FreeBSD.org, Baptiste Daroussin To: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= References: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> <86mvcvojzt.fsf@desk.des.no> <20170308204126.6d152c44@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <861su6ont5.fsf@desk.des.no> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 12:29:49 -0000 --Apple-Mail=_158C0438-7EB6-4369-B706-5BA4441CF800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 On 9 Mar 2017, at 09:29, Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav wrote: ... > 1) >=20 > | I discovered that lang/gcc48 (and presumably the other gcc ports as > | well) not only have /usr/local/include in their default include = path, > | but actually place it ahead of /usr/include. This is causing me no = end > | of grief with software that uses iconv, because GNU libiconv's = > | f*s up your namespace so the build fails unless you explicitly link = with > | GNU libiconv instead of using the libc version. [...] >=20 > 2) >=20 > | [...] I realized over the weekend that = the > | situation is even worse than I initially thought. Basically, ports = gcc > | is unusable for any other purpose than to build ports which don't > | support clang. Let me explain with a hypothetical scenario: > | > | You are developing a library which is important enough that you need = to > | have the stable version installed on your development system. It is > | installed in /usr/local as usual. You've been working on fixing a = bug, > | and have written a unit test which exercises the relevant code and > | verified that it can deterministically trigger the bug. You fix the = bug > | and 'make check' again, all green. Then you clean out your working > | copy, re-run configure with CC=3Dgcc and 'make check' again. Your = tests > | fail. > | > | What happened is that when you built your code with gcc, the tests = were > | linked and run with the stable version of the library, where the bug = is > | not fixed. You can build with LDFLAGS=3D-L$(top_builddir)/lib, you = can > | even specify the full path to the library in LDADD for each = individual > | test, it doesn't matter. It will *always* pick the installed = version > | first. The only way to get your tests to pass is to not have the > | library installed. Please pin this email for re-use the next time a discussion is started about adding /usr/local to the default include and library paths for the base system compiler... It's been more than a year now, so I expect it to be regurgitated any time soon. :) -Dimitry --Apple-Mail=_158C0438-7EB6-4369-B706-5BA4441CF800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.30 iEYEARECAAYFAljBSrEACgkQsF6jCi4glqO4TgCdFuLXd4PMTuMXebe5Xsp7kCq+ sM0AnjCCTOAdqi5P9oGEcS8gYOmuxOlC =7qLs -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Apple-Mail=_158C0438-7EB6-4369-B706-5BA4441CF800-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Mar 9 12:42:22 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 070AECFBF64 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 12:42:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@immure.com) Received: from maul.immure.com (108-84-10-9.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.84.10.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8A37DE6 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 12:42:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com ([10.1.132.9]) by maul.immure.com with esmtp (Exim 4.88 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1clxOX-00012R-52; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 06:42:13 -0600 Received: from rancor.immure.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v29CgDbQ021941; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 06:42:13 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: (from bob@localhost) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.14.9/Submit) id v29CgC0m021940; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 06:42:12 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from bob) Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 06:42:12 -0600 From: Bob Willcox To: "Matthew D. Fuller" Cc: Kevin Oberman , Freddie Cash , ports list Subject: Re: Best way to cause synth to ignore rebuilding of a port?? Message-ID: <20170309124212.GL22199@rancor.immure.com> Reply-To: Bob Willcox References: <20170308160420.GG22199@rancor.immure.com> <20170308195705.GI22199@rancor.immure.com> <20170308211337.GJ22199@rancor.immure.com> <20170309042155.GE49602@over-yonder.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170309042155.GE49602@over-yonder.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.1 (2016-10-04) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 12:42:22 -0000 On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:21:55PM -0600, Matthew D. Fuller wrote: > On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 03:13:37PM -0600 I heard the voice of > Bob Willcox, and lo! it spake thus: > > > > Hmm, the plugin/addon I use and would be lost without is for tab > > groups. Do they still work in 52? > > I'm pretty sure it's 57 (or 58?) that they're getting broken. > Certainly they work fine here on the current 52 out of ports. That's good to know. If/when tab groups don't work any longer is when I stop updating firefox. They are the thing miss the most when using other browsers. > > > -- > Matthew Fuller (MF4839) | fullermd@over-yonder.net > Systems/Network Administrator | http://www.over-yonder.net/~fullermd/ > On the Internet, nobody can hear you scream. -- Bob Willcox | If a program is useful, it will be changed. bob@immure.com | Austin, TX | From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Mar 9 16:46:39 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA76AD05D62 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 16:46:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from citrin+bsd@citrin.ru) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B600FCA2 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 16:46:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from citrin+bsd@citrin.ru) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id AF5D7D05D60; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 16:46:39 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEBD6D05D5E; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 16:46:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from citrin+bsd@citrin.ru) Received: from hz.citrin.ru (hz.citrin.ru [IPv6:2a01:4f8:d16:10c3::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 795DDCA0; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 16:46:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from citrin+bsd@citrin.ru) Received: from x220.lan (unknown [IPv6:2601:18a:c301:8eee:9a6:c76b:7d:95c0]) by hz.citrin.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A4AB229A630; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 16:46:37 +0000 (UTC) Subject: Re: manpath change for ports ? To: Baptiste Daroussin , arch@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org References: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> From: Anton Yuzhaninov Message-ID: Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 11:46:35 -0500 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=citrin.ru; s=s0; t=1489077998; bh=cuJ0GeFQCtDo0TdtKReGo/w6k8USgyexEPxoAdy+Auc=; h=Subject:To:References:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:In-Reply-To:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=HVC4xUmQn/eEp5sjcHIWpFVR65xor6NZYHbaqlVAK+UhxIcyIdNv85FVDHZW7KWXr+YNuYIZar6J67h+c/ENrr47XBfLv/Kms/qCJQ0emjHmgznKQBQxl3N92hSwdaS0yFEWm2LPbeFGPScNEL63nJ4jAUvQby4n9ZJMIY5LG9E= X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 16:46:39 -0000 On 03/06/17 18:56, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > I think we should add /usr/local/share/man in the manpath along with at first > and maybe instead of in long term. > > The reason is: > - /usr/local/share/man seems more consistent to me with base which have: > /usr/share/man > - It will remove lots of patches from the ports tree where were we need to patch > upstream build system to install in a non usual path. 1. During transition period having two trees for man pages - /usr/local/share/man and /usr/share/man will be additional headache. 2. When /usr/local/man will be removed some ports should be patched to use /usr/local/share/man instead /usr/local/man and we almost back to square one (with fewer ports to patch). 3. Patching man path is trivial comparing other challenges during porting software to FreeBSD. For me current situation with man path is not a big issue. 4. Linux Filesystem Hierarchy Standard has /usr/share/man but /usr/local/man Given all above I don't think this change is worth benefits it will have. Also when/if you will add /usr/local/share/man, please submit patch to cmake: https://gitlab.kitware.com/cmake/cmake/blob/master/Modules/GNUInstallDirs.cmake#L273 Currently cmake defines CMAKE_INSTALL_MANDIR to $PREFIX/man on FreeBSD. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Mar 9 18:06:53 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96A6ED0588E for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:06:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kristen.bell@digitalinfozone.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FD32623 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:06:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kristen.bell@digitalinfozone.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 4C147D0588D; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:06:53 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B9E1D0588C for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:06:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kristen.bell@digitalinfozone.com) Received: from IND01-BO1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bo1ind01on0053.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.101.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "Microsoft IT SSL SHA2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 697E85F7 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:06:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kristen.bell@digitalinfozone.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=NETORGFT2155543.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-digitalinfozone-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=Z3U8tvnZay17sUnW20P6VZpF1Pdq0JIEsaNUG5r3wvo=; b=DF0GN2RADwEeSV0e54in5ESB/WurCEQMO5hSuq3QEf2TSuGj8zj5zs1zxf3GiO0wx8jjHx8ZOcSGZRYFwoZTn3wNH+mErhYHoTn+VG+QRjCdudlczN8aTS11NOC2rbhMUfTo14UHHJrkxgzPA/CjnxEldCotxVNd+Kn6AkN+YJo= Received: from PN1PR01MB0608.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (10.164.142.23) by PN1PR01MB0607.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM (10.164.142.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.947.12; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:06:48 +0000 Received: from PN1PR01MB0608.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([10.164.142.23]) by PN1PR01MB0608.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM ([10.164.142.23]) with mapi id 15.01.0947.022; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:06:48 +0000 From: Kristen Bell To: "ports@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: HD Expo 2017 Attendees Contact information Thread-Topic: Re: HD Expo 2017 Attendees Contact information Thread-Index: AdKY/+jHqrYzY7Q+QISTD9bUAdGOQg== Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:06:47 +0000 Message-ID: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=kristen.bell@digitalinfozone.com; x-originating-ip: [103.57.83.120] x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: a1d5552d-ce0d-4bd0-7740-08d467170de0 x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(22001)(201702085552020)(201702085551020); SRVR:PN1PR01MB0607; x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; PN1PR01MB0607; 7:iMS1tkfmG2hdRQYfqbfVTdsMKEEw8WzeT4YK72bWjCZjhB7ngmghyQl8mwGrdNZ72ylxFFAfpuV5hPnV170a5Liqa4Ad+zfH59FhPyQ13YSurv14UR1DGudAY5JKr2dJ/24TMAkC1N5SonE6H8J0WNMgq3kEKUVa2OSwpU8G3joF9I6cxj1tQTkjXR0rpMktgOPuej3a0e9/ywYNQcgYV7RKWuDY7OKEzoVb45F9sZUMUqT+rxuB8+T3QzbCIv/cJ842k4+QRFzxW876ByX+sa25u+Q/Czz9/ugarE6+dGhIisuQYQEd5A4yiG3x7j6h04jkfH6hixZnbGKatwMuAw== x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(21748063052155); x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040375)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(3002001)(6041248)(20161123564025)(20161123558025)(2016111802025)(20161123562025)(20161123555025)(20161123560025)(6043046)(6072148); SRVR:PN1PR01MB0607; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:PN1PR01MB0607; x-forefront-prvs: 0241D5F98C x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(39450400003)(39840400002)(39850400002)(39410400002)(151974002)(53936002)(5630700001)(122556002)(7736002)(5660300001)(9686003)(2501003)(38730400002)(6306002)(110136004)(54896002)(6246003)(2906002)(189998001)(1730700003)(77096006)(6506006)(9326002)(8676002)(223583001)(5640700003)(81166006)(8936002)(9476002)(229853002)(6916009)(6116002)(86362001)(790700001)(102836003)(3846002)(7696004)(6436002)(2900100001)(50986999)(54356999)(3280700002)(66066001)(55016002)(74316002)(3660700001)(2351001)(33656002)(35810200001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:PN1PR01MB0607; H:PN1PR01MB0608.INDPRD01.PROD.OUTLOOK.COM; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:ovr; PTR:InfoNoRecords; LANG:en; received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: digitalinfozone.com does not designate permitted sender hosts) spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: digitalinfozone.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 09 Mar 2017 18:06:47.9711 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 61584268-d2c5-44bb-b8df-ba5a962387e5 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PN1PR01MB0607 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.23 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 18:06:53 -0000 Hi, I found your company listed as Sponsors and Exhibitors HD expo 2017 and I t= hought you would Be Interested in Attendees Contact information for your RO= I. List Contains: Name, Company's Name, Phone Number, Fax Number, Job Title, E= mail address, Complete Mailing Address, SIC code, Company revenue, size, We= b address etc. We offer: * Complete list with Email address in an Excel Sheet for unlimited usag= e. * Do an email blast endorsing your product/services and providing your = contact information. * Email appending, multiple contacts appending, Data appending which wi= ll append or add the missing information to your existing database. Let me know your thoughts or pass on the message to the right person in you= r company. Thanks & regards, Kristen Bell Demand Generation Executive. If you don't want to receive any message from us then please type "L= eave Out" in the Subject Line. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Mar 9 18:46:57 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3176FD05A31 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:46:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DF4DA6F for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:46:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 195B8D05A2F; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:46:57 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 157F6D05A2B; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:46:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from mail.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD7C6A6D; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 18:46:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from ralph.baldwin.cx (c-73-231-226-104.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.226.104]) by mail.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C8B5A10A7DB; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 13:46:55 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Cc: Dag-Erling =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= , Baptiste Daroussin , ports@freebsd.org, arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: manpath change for ports ? Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 10:20:48 -0800 Message-ID: <2721378.xr7MGKcqvA@ralph.baldwin.cx> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (FreeBSD/11.0-STABLE; KDE/4.14.10; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <86mvcvojzt.fsf@desk.des.no> References: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> <86mvcvojzt.fsf@desk.des.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (mail.baldwin.cx); Thu, 09 Mar 2017 13:46:55 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.99.2 at mail.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 18:46:57 -0000 On Wednesday, March 08, 2017 04:39:50 PM Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > Baptiste Daroussin writes: > > I would like to propose a change in the localbase hier for ports > > > > I think we should add /usr/local/share/man in the manpath along wit= h > > at first and maybe instead of in long term. >=20 > 2) plus info -> share/info as suggested by jbeich >=20 > 3) plus libdata/pkgconfig -> lib/pkgconfig >=20 > These three items will ensure that "./configure --prefix=3D/usr/local= && > make install" will do the right thing out of the box - by changing ou= r > definition of "the right thing" to match what the GNU autotools have > been doing for at least 15 years. >=20 > 4) Remove the hardcoded library path in lang/gcc* >=20 > This makes it possible to work on software that includes both librari= es > and programs while an earlier copy of the same software is already > installed. With the current state of gcc, the programs you are worki= ng > on will be linked against the version of the library that's already > installed instead of the version you just compiled, and there is noth= ing > you can do to prevent it. You won't notice anything if all you ever = do > is "make && make install", because the new library will replace the o= ld, > but if you try to run your program directly from the build tree, it w= ill > use the wrong library. This can be incredibly frustrating if you're = not > aware of it - imagine you're trying to fix a bug in that library and = no > matter what you do, your regression test keeps failing... +1 on all these. I think that ports compilers should not have /usr/local/include or /usr/local/lib as implicit paths either as others= have stated. I wouldn't even mind if we had both /usr/local/man and /usr/local/share= /man so long as our default MANPATH included both if that means applying few= er patches to ports. --=20 John Baldwin From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Mar 9 20:54:24 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4703D05A60 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 20:54:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) Received: from tatiana.utanet.at (tatiana.utanet.at [IPv6:2001:938:1337:25::25:46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 95598C12 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 20:54:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=utanet.at; s=rev1; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From:Subject:References:To; bh=RuZnEG0rmA/WbMUzlvFNtp7jjYdOqQuwN0yYHfFgHXI=; b=E5gOFjyyHV1qufGihfG36gI1NXmbj85Dfa2pENBAoEsTPu7GTXbvSfJMQwNDiJYhCHWYA9vhi8yBnecnJf6fCLgHa522VO9q75HncWAKBytkgJVWeGW1uCRpoJb5mEYUsMDNHOynZFHA2VHSLHsNRRpnhIAtMaPO2EIjG4MHr38=; Received: from patricia.xoc.tele2net.at ([213.90.36.9]) by tatiana.utanet.at with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1cm54j-0006Me-0w for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 21:54:17 +0100 Received: from 62-47-168-124.adsl.highway.telekom.at ([62.47.168.124] helo=[10.0.0.93]) by patricia.xoc.tele2net.at with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1cm54i-0007Bd-Ui for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2017 21:54:17 +0100 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: Subject: Re: Issue with re-installation of bash and Sudo ... From: Walter Schwarzenfeld Message-ID: <1afeb6c5-0644-fd11-02ec-610d005e2296@utanet.at> Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 21:54:15 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TELE2-Authenticated-As: cf62768e218b4d81d95cc5390f1bd9dfc8b05683 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 20:54:24 -0000 Sometimes the dependencies not proper cleaned. Try make clean-depends. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Thu Mar 9 21:11:13 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D02D0D05D65; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 21:11:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (elsa.codelab.cz [94.124.105.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87FF01440; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 21:11:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from 000.fbsd@quip.cz) Received: from elsa.codelab.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F4728460; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 22:11:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from illbsd.quip.test (ip-86-49-16-209.net.upcbroadband.cz [86.49.16.209]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by elsa.codelab.cz (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AD5A028432; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 22:11:03 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Issue with re-installation of bash and Sudo ... To: Uma Somasundaram , gecko@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: From: Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz> Message-ID: <58C1C4E7.50006@quip.cz> Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 22:11:03 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:42.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/42.0 SeaMonkey/2.39 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2017 21:11:13 -0000 Uma Somasundaram wrote on 2017/03/09 07:13: > Hi , > > > I have upgraded FF version from : 24.3.0_2,1 -> 45.6.0_3,1 in > Free BSD 9.2 version, > > How do I reinstall the Sudo or bash? which I lost after the Browser upgrade > , > While adding the package Iam getting below error , FreeBSD 9.2 is unsupported version sou old packages are no longer available. You should upgrade your system to 10.3 or 11.0 and then upgrade all installed packages. Miroslav Lachman From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Mar 10 01:43:17 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B925CD05478 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 01:43:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kaduk@mit.edu) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9922C1802 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 01:43:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kaduk@mit.edu) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 924C9D05474; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 01:43:17 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91A7BD05472; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 01:43:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kaduk@mit.edu) Received: from dmz-mailsec-scanner-5.mit.edu (dmz-mailsec-scanner-5.mit.edu [18.7.68.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1455617FC; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 01:43:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kaduk@mit.edu) X-AuditID: 12074422-8cfff70000004a21-ea-58c204ad08e4 Received: from mailhub-auth-2.mit.edu ( [18.7.62.36]) (using TLS with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id E1.C7.18977.DA402C85; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 20:43:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from outgoing.mit.edu (outgoing-auth-1.mit.edu [18.9.28.11]) by mailhub-auth-2.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.9.2) with ESMTP id v2A1h8XY021209; Thu, 9 Mar 2017 20:43:08 -0500 Received: from kduck.kaduk.org (24-107-191-124.dhcp.stls.mo.charter.com [24.107.191.124]) (authenticated bits=56) (User authenticated as kaduk@ATHENA.MIT.EDU) by outgoing.mit.edu (8.13.8/8.12.4) with ESMTP id v2A1h57R004569 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Thu, 9 Mar 2017 20:43:08 -0500 Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2017 19:43:05 -0600 From: Benjamin Kaduk To: Tijl Coosemans Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: manpath change for ports ? Message-ID: <20170310014305.GO30306@kduck.kaduk.org> References: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> <86mvcvojzt.fsf@desk.des.no> <20170308204126.6d152c44@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <861su6ont5.fsf@desk.des.no> <20170309123532.09b87366@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170309123532.09b87366@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.6.1 (2016-04-27) X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFvrGIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUixG6noruW5VCEQeMKdYslM+YxW2yb3Mpo sWflakYHZo8Zn+azBDBGcdmkpOZklqUW6dslcGW8Pb+EuWA5c8WOYz4NjDeYuhg5OSQETCTO TD3I0sXIxSEk0MYksah7JzOEs4FRYsf6lYwQzhWgzMp3bCAtLAIqEp/23gRrZwOyG7ovM4PY IgKqEnN2zWIHsZkF1CVenwJp5uQQBrK73hwCq+cFWnfqwnywGiGB54wSk6cFQcQFJU7OfMIC 0aslcePfS6B6DiBbWmL5Pw6QMKeAk8TrCb1graICyhINMx4wT2AUmIWkexaS7lkI3QsYmVcx yqbkVunmJmbmFKcm6xYnJ+blpRbpmurlZpbopaaUbmIEB6mL0g7Gif+8DjEKcDAq8fDOyD4Y IcSaWFZcmXuIUZKDSUmUl4PpUIQQX1J+SmVGYnFGfFFpTmrxIUYJDmYlEV7zx0DlvCmJlVWp RfkwKWkOFiVxXnGNxgghgfTEktTs1NSC1CKYrAwHh5IE73RmoKGCRanpqRVpmTklCGkmDk6Q 4TxAw0NBaniLCxJzizPTIfKnGHU5bhw/8IZJiCUvPy9VSpz3P8h1AiBFGaV5cHNAyUUie3/N K0ZxoLeEeRNARvEAExPcpFdAS5iAlkzjA/mguCQRISXVwJi7e0WMdFj9cunVm4LnLFO7Jd/Y 2NYtkuBV2HVpb/VlxQy18+WqV05V55Wof6lZbnl/R11CnYRJ9q3QmR/Tq4v/HD3fuv7vk0ls hoHu064YZNTuVlkr0u2mX6wmueNau1vBwbLjkebXpzzzurTt0fHzHY0bM0p0de5qsD3ce0Zu +6pIbmV3HSWW4oxEQy3mouJEAIu8DAkJAwAA X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 01:43:17 -0000 On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 12:35:32PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > Note that -rpath /usr/local/lib isn't added by gcc but by libtool > because it assumes rtld will not search that directory automatically. > If you run './configure CC=gcc --prefix=/usr && make check' the tests > should succeed (without --enable-new-dtags) because -rpath isn't used > then. Sounds like a bug in the libtool packaging, then? -Ben From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Mar 10 06:04:04 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5357BD05A3C for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 06:04:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41E8015EF for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 06:04:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 3E94AD05A3B; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 06:04:04 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C980D05A3A for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 06:04:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:6601]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2427E15EE for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 06:04:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.2]) by portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v2A6449A087003 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 06:04:04 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild@portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org) Received: (from indexbuild@localhost) by portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v2A6443Q087002 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 06:04:04 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild) Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 06:04:04 GMT From: Ports Index build Message-Id: <201703100604.v2A6443Q087002@portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX build failed for 10.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 06:04:04 -0000 INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-10 - please wait..--- describe.accessibility --- --- describe.arabic --- --- describe.archivers --- --- describe.astro --- --- describe.audio --- --- describe.benchmarks --- --- describe.biology --- --- describe.cad --- --- describe.chinese --- --- describe.comms --- --- describe.converters --- --- describe.databases --- --- describe.deskutils --- --- describe.devel --- --- describe.dns --- --- describe.editors --- --- describe.emulators --- --- describe.finance --- --- describe.french --- --- describe.ftp --- [...] --- describe.print --- --- describe.russian --- --- describe.science --- --- describe.security --- --- describe.shells --- --- describe.sysutils --- --- describe.textproc --- --- describe.ukrainian --- --- describe.vietnamese --- --- describe.www --- --- describe.x11 --- --- describe.x11-clocks --- --- describe.x11-drivers --- --- describe.x11-fm --- --- describe.x11-fonts --- --- describe.x11-servers --- --- describe.x11-themes --- --- describe.x11-toolkits --- --- describe.x11-wm --- Done. make_index: /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/math/vtk6: no entry for /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/devel/libc++ Committers on the hook: bjk stephen Most recent SVN update was: Updating '.': U net/openafs/Makefile U net/openafs/distinfo U net/openafs/files/patch-configure U net/openafs/files/patch-doc-man-pages-Makefile.in U net/openafs/files/patch-src-packaging-FreeBSD-Makefile.man U net/openafs/files/patch-src-rx-rx_kernel.h U net/openafs/files/patch-src__kauth__Makefile.in U net/openafs/pkg-plist U math/vtk6/Makefile A math/vtk6/files/patch-ThirdParty_hdf5_vtkhdf5_CMakeInstallation.cmake Updated to revision 435820. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Mar 10 07:49:01 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5CEAD02747 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 07:49:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2DE81350 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 07:49:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A246AD02745; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 07:49:01 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1FA4D02744 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 07:49:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (portscout.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9561D134F for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 07:49:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portscout.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.123]) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v2A7n1Ni048222 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 07:49:01 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from portscout@localhost) by portscout.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v2A7n1Go048220; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 07:49:01 GMT (envelope-from portscout@FreeBSD.org) Message-Id: <201703100749.v2A7n1Go048220@portscout.ysv.freebsd.org> X-Authentication-Warning: portscout.ysv.freebsd.org: portscout set sender to portscout@FreeBSD.org using -f Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Type: text/plain MIME-Version: 1.0 Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 07:49:01 +0000 From: portscout@FreeBSD.org To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: FreeBSD ports you maintain which are out of date X-Mailer: portscout/0.8.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 07:49:01 -0000 Dear port maintainer, The portscout new distfile checker has detected that one or more of your ports appears to be out of date. Please take the opportunity to check each of the ports listed below, and if possible and appropriate, submit/commit an update. If any ports have already been updated, you can safely ignore the entry. You will not be e-mailed again for any of the port/version combinations below. Full details can be found at the following URL: http://portscout.freebsd.org/ports@freebsd.org.html Port | Current version | New version ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ games/lm-solve | 0.8.4 | 0.10.1 ------------------------------------------------+-----------------+------------ If any of the above results are invalid, please check the following page for details on how to improve portscout's detection and selection of distfiles on a per-port basis: http://portscout.freebsd.org/info/portscout-portconfig.txt Thanks. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Mar 10 09:06:17 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8BDCBD04F15 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:06:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AE281387 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:06:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 7A3A2D04F14; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:06:17 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79E1AD04F13 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:06:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:6601]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6EB161386 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:06:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.2]) by portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v2A96HBi085651 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:06:17 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild@portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org) Received: (from indexbuild@localhost) by portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v2A96HTK085650 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:06:17 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild) Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:06:17 GMT From: Ports Index build Message-Id: <201703100906.v2A96HTK085650@portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX build failed for 10.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:06:17 -0000 INDEX build failed with errors: Generating INDEX-10 - please wait..--- describe.accessibility --- --- describe.arabic --- --- describe.archivers --- --- describe.astro --- --- describe.audio --- --- describe.benchmarks --- --- describe.biology --- --- describe.cad --- --- describe.chinese --- --- describe.comms --- --- describe.converters --- --- describe.databases --- --- describe.deskutils --- --- describe.devel --- --- describe.dns --- --- describe.editors --- --- describe.emulators --- --- describe.finance --- --- describe.french --- --- describe.ftp --- [...] --- describe.print --- --- describe.russian --- --- describe.science --- --- describe.security --- --- describe.shells --- --- describe.sysutils --- --- describe.textproc --- --- describe.ukrainian --- --- describe.vietnamese --- --- describe.www --- --- describe.x11 --- --- describe.x11-clocks --- --- describe.x11-drivers --- --- describe.x11-fm --- --- describe.x11-fonts --- --- describe.x11-servers --- --- describe.x11-themes --- --- describe.x11-toolkits --- --- describe.x11-wm --- Done. make_index: /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/math/vtk6: no entry for /home/indexbuild/tindex/ports/devel/libc++ Committers on the hook: bjk stephen Most recent SVN update was: Updating '.': At revision 435820. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Mar 10 09:51:46 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 71A8BD05033 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:51:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD811088 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:51:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 5B4ECD05032; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:51:46 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58E38D05030; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:51:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from smtp.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2457E1085; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:51:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from desk.des.no (smtp.des.no [194.63.250.102]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10AFE549E; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:50:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: by desk.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id C261571AD; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 10:50:39 +0100 (CET) From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= To: John Baldwin Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin , ports@freebsd.org, arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: manpath change for ports ? References: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> <86mvcvojzt.fsf@desk.des.no> <2721378.xr7MGKcqvA@ralph.baldwin.cx> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 10:50:39 +0100 In-Reply-To: <2721378.xr7MGKcqvA@ralph.baldwin.cx> (John Baldwin's message of "Thu, 09 Mar 2017 10:20:48 -0800") Message-ID: <86a88tmpe8.fsf@desk.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 09:51:46 -0000 John Baldwin writes: > I wouldn't even mind if we had both /usr/local/man and /usr/local/share/m= an > so long as our default MANPATH included both if that means applying fewer > patches to ports. The default MANPATH is constructed dynamically from PATH: 1. From each component of the user's PATH for the first of: - pathname/man - pathname/MAN - If pathname ends with /bin: pathname/../man Note: Special logic exists to make /bin and /usr/bin look in /usr/share/man for manual files. If we change this to: 1. From each component of the user's PATH for the first of: - pathname/man - pathname/MAN - If pathname ends with /bin or /sbin: pathname/../man and pathname/../share/man we wouldn't need any "special logic", but I really don't like the idea of having different ports installing man pages in different locations. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Mar 10 11:38:59 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3904CD06DE1 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 11:38:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1FB7DE71 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 11:38:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 1C1C2D06DDF; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 11:38:59 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1B700D06DDD; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 11:38:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: from mailrelay117.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay117.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.20.144]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "relay.skynet.be", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A22FE6F; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 11:38:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2CkDwBEj8JY/0nD8VFdDg4BAQQBAQoBA?= =?us-ascii?q?YNRQRCBGo5hkF0pAZUOgg6GIgKCOEIWAQIBAQEBAQEBayiFFgEFOhwjEAsYCSU?= =?us-ascii?q?PKh4GE4oEs0aKaQEBAQEBBQEBAQEkiz2KOQWcOpIrdpA5k0AmCieBAzgsCIZXP?= =?us-ascii?q?j81ihoBAQE?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2CkDwBEj8JY/0nD8VFdDg4BAQQBAQoBAYNRQRCBGo5hkF0?= =?us-ascii?q?pAZUOgg6GIgKCOEIWAQIBAQEBAQEBayiFFgEFOhwjEAsYCSUPKh4GE4oEs0aKa?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBAQEBBQEBAQEkiz2KOQWcOpIrdpA5k0AmCieBAzgsCIZXPj81ihoBAQE?= Received: from 73.195-241-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([81.241.195.73]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 10 Mar 2017 12:38:49 +0100 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v2ABcmaJ097730; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 12:38:48 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 12:38:47 +0100 From: Tijl Coosemans To: Benjamin Kaduk Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, arch@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: manpath change for ports ? Message-ID: <20170310123847.109f9e4b@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <20170310014305.GO30306@kduck.kaduk.org> References: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> <86mvcvojzt.fsf@desk.des.no> <20170308204126.6d152c44@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <861su6ont5.fsf@desk.des.no> <20170309123532.09b87366@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20170310014305.GO30306@kduck.kaduk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 11:38:59 -0000 On Thu, 9 Mar 2017 19:43:05 -0600 Benjamin Kaduk wrote: > On Thu, Mar 09, 2017 at 12:35:32PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> Note that -rpath /usr/local/lib isn't added by gcc but by libtool >> because it assumes rtld will not search that directory automatically. >> If you run './configure CC=gcc --prefix=/usr && make check' the tests >> should succeed (without --enable-new-dtags) because -rpath isn't used >> then. > > Sounds like a bug in the libtool packaging, then? Rtld only searches /lib and /usr/lib. It also searches the ldconfig hints file and /usr/local/lib is there by default (ldconfig_paths in /etc/defaults/rc.conf), but users are allowed to change that, for instance when they install ports in another location than /usr/local. Arguably, because our default compiler links with --enable-new-dtags, gcc should as well, but because of the different run-time semantics of DT_RPATH and DT_RUNPATH this is a potential minefield. Upstream binutils changed the default in ld once and this was quickly reverted. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Mar 10 12:04:00 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42ADDD040B8 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 12:04:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3181C252 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 12:04:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 2DF33D040B7; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 12:04:00 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D8FED040B6 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 12:04:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:6601]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 088DF251 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 12:04:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from indexbuild@FreeBSD.org) Received: from portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.2]) by portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v2AC3xpK076192 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 12:03:59 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild@portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org) Received: (from indexbuild@localhost) by portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v2AC3xfh076190 for ports@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 12:03:59 GMT (envelope-from indexbuild) Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 12:03:59 GMT From: Ports Index build Message-Id: <201703101203.v2AC3xfh076190@portsindexbuild.ysv.freebsd.org> To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: INDEX now builds successfully on 10.x X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 12:04:00 -0000 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Mar 10 13:27:38 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92002D0690F for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:27:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hansdehartog@xs4all.nl) Received: from lb1-smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net (lb1-smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net [194.109.24.24]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "*.xs4all.nl", Issuer "GlobalSign Domain Validation CA - SHA256 - G2" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 377151614 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:27:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hansdehartog@xs4all.nl) Received: from [IPv6:2001:985:5a75:1:223:24ff:fe18:4697] ([IPv6:2001:985:5a75:1:223:24ff:fe18:4697]) by smtp-cloud6.xs4all.net with ESMTP id uDSK1u0063NjpSx01DSLz2; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 14:26:21 +0100 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Hans de Hartog Subject: Chicken/egg problem with pkg Message-ID: Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 14:26:19 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:27:38 -0000 I have an old web server (10.1-RELEASE-p9) which is running for years without any upgrades. Now I want to install a simple port (trafshow, to see what's going on). It first want to upgrade pkg from 1.5.1 to 1.10.0_2 but that doesn't work: [1/1] Upgrading pkg from 1.5.1 to 1.10.0_2... [1/1] Extracting pkg-1.10.0_2: 100% /usr/local/lib/libpkg.so.4: Undefined symbol "openat" Anything I try to do with pkg now gives me this error-message. /var/log/messages says: pkg: pkg upgraded: 1.5.1 -> 1.10.0_2 How do I proceed from here (without upgrading everything, please)? Thanks in advance, Hans From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Mar 10 13:47:34 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3895FD06E42 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:47:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mail.madpilot.net (grunt.madpilot.net [78.47.145.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F18341EC for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:47:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mail (mail [192.168.254.3]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3vfpV469pQzZxV for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 14:47:24 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=madpilot.net; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:date:message-id:from:from :references:subject:subject:received:received; s=mail; t= 1489153643; x=1490968044; bh=B023mXu0eRc2zu4PEQ1HQ0osIHvqKuHTcAI tKb8GjyA=; b=XtPP/P6mV6psR9o8r+EQ4dl0yXGSDACXadXwsHggnCyG8X1PXB8 bXARAJy6W6tvxYgwniAeEB9LQGijU69La3Ph3a5i/nT2E6PpFAW95JlmZfJQcDQM lkrE8dw3L6zbpSzlMhDUFP1sCAjyxNs6lAMo3ED6+0MRtrIiG8mAmDGE= Received: from mail.madpilot.net ([192.168.254.3]) by mail (mail.madpilot.net [192.168.254.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bhYZv0EzCh6I for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 14:47:23 +0100 (CET) Received: from tommy.madpilot.net (micro.madpilot.net [88.149.173.206]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 14:47:23 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Chicken/egg problem with pkg To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: From: Guido Falsi Message-ID: <06a269f9-b942-5f1b-717c-7de4a60bd263@madpilot.net> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 14:47:22 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:47:34 -0000 On 03/10/17 14:26, Hans de Hartog wrote: > I have an old web server (10.1-RELEASE-p9) which is running for years > > without any upgrades. Now I want to install a simple port (trafshow, to > > see what's going on). > > It first want to upgrade pkg from 1.5.1 to 1.10.0_2 but that doesn't work: > > [1/1] Upgrading pkg from 1.5.1 to 1.10.0_2... > [1/1] Extracting pkg-1.10.0_2: 100% > /usr/local/lib/libpkg.so.4: Undefined symbol "openat" > > Anything I try to do with pkg now gives me this error-message. > > /var/log/messages says: pkg: pkg upgraded: 1.5.1 -> 1.10.0_2 > > How do I proceed from here (without upgrading everything, please)? > Have you tried using the "pkg-static" command? It's the same as pkg, but statically linked, should sidestep your issue. -- Guido Falsi From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Mar 10 13:55:17 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50FC3D04140 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:55:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crest@rlwinm.de) Received: from smtp.rlwinm.de (smtp.rlwinm.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:201:31ef::e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1DEB8A08 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:55:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crest@rlwinm.de) Received: from crest.lan.bultmann.eu (unknown [87.253.189.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.rlwinm.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4A9CA713E for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 14:55:14 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Chicken/egg problem with pkg To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: From: Jan Bramkamp Message-ID: Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 14:55:13 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:55:17 -0000 On 10/03/2017 14:26, Hans de Hartog wrote: > I have an old web server (10.1-RELEASE-p9) which is running for years > > without any upgrades. Now I want to install a simple port (trafshow, to > > see what's going on). > > It first want to upgrade pkg from 1.5.1 to 1.10.0_2 but that doesn't work: > > [1/1] Upgrading pkg from 1.5.1 to 1.10.0_2... > [1/1] Extracting pkg-1.10.0_2: 100% > /usr/local/lib/libpkg.so.4: Undefined symbol "openat" > > Anything I try to do with pkg now gives me this error-message. > > /var/log/messages says: pkg: pkg upgraded: 1.5.1 -> 1.10.0_2 > > How do I proceed from here (without upgrading everything, please)? You dug yourself a deep hole by letting your system fall that far behind. Both FreeBSD 10.1 and 10.2 are EoL since 2016-12-31 (https://www.freebsd.org/security/unsupported.html). While FreeBSD is backward compatible (e.g. you can run binaries for 10.1 on 10.3) it isn't forward compatible (e.g. you can't run FreeBSD 10.3 binaries on 10.1). In your case the problem is that the official package build jails run the oldest supported minor release inside each major release. After 2016-12-31 the build jails migrated from 10.1 to 10.3. Among other things FreeBSD 10.3 added a bunch of new *at() system calls like openat. These *at() system calls are useful inside (capsicum) sandboxes. Your old 10.1 kernel lacks those systems calls and your old 10.1 libc lacks the stubs to call them anyways. It is this missing stub that causes the new libpkg.so to fail to link. Running unpatched networked systems is a bad habit in most cases, but it is reckless to run an unpatched webserver, because webservers offer a large attack surface to the network. Your simplest way forward is to update to the latest patchlevel and than migrate to a supported release (at least 10.3 as of writing). Afterward you can upgrade your packages from the default repos. Upgrading to a newer minor release of the same major release is fast and painless with freebsd-update. Upgrading to the next major release shouldn't cause any problems, but you have to reinstall all packages. This was a major annoyance before pkgng, but these days changing the repo ABI and a single `pkg upgrade` does that in a few minutes. Or you write this system off as probably compromised and rebuild it from scratch ;-). From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Mar 10 13:57:34 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F1E7D04205 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:57:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crest@rlwinm.de) Received: from smtp.rlwinm.de (smtp.rlwinm.de [IPv6:2a01:4f8:201:31ef::e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BFBDB81 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:57:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crest@rlwinm.de) Received: from crest.lan.bultmann.eu (unknown [87.253.189.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.rlwinm.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D85867141 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 14:57:32 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Chicken/egg problem with pkg To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <06a269f9-b942-5f1b-717c-7de4a60bd263@madpilot.net> From: Jan Bramkamp Message-ID: <28fa36aa-e1b1-d58b-96cb-17da0428a150@rlwinm.de> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 14:57:32 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <06a269f9-b942-5f1b-717c-7de4a60bd263@madpilot.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:57:34 -0000 On 10/03/2017 14:47, Guido Falsi wrote: > On 03/10/17 14:26, Hans de Hartog wrote: >> I have an old web server (10.1-RELEASE-p9) which is running for years >> >> without any upgrades. Now I want to install a simple port (trafshow, to >> >> see what's going on). >> >> It first want to upgrade pkg from 1.5.1 to 1.10.0_2 but that doesn't >> work: >> >> [1/1] Upgrading pkg from 1.5.1 to 1.10.0_2... >> [1/1] Extracting pkg-1.10.0_2: 100% >> /usr/local/lib/libpkg.so.4: Undefined symbol "openat" >> >> Anything I try to do with pkg now gives me this error-message. >> >> /var/log/messages says: pkg: pkg upgraded: 1.5.1 -> 1.10.0_2 >> >> How do I proceed from here (without upgrading everything, please)? >> > > Have you tried using the "pkg-static" command? It's the same as pkg, but > statically linked, should sidestep your issue. The old pkg-static might work, but it would wreck his system because he uses a repo with an ABI unsupported by his base + kernel system. He is lucky he immediately triggered the incompatibility. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Mar 10 14:08:24 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 381D6D048AF for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 14:08:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from kib.kiev.ua (kib.kiev.ua [IPv6:2001:470:d5e7:1::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C496814CF for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 14:08:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) Received: from tom.home (kib@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kib.kiev.ua (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id v2AE8FTh047344 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:08:15 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.10.3 kib.kiev.ua v2AE8FTh047344 Received: (from kostik@localhost) by tom.home (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v2AE8F5T047343; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:08:15 +0200 (EET) (envelope-from kostikbel@gmail.com) X-Authentication-Warning: tom.home: kostik set sender to kostikbel@gmail.com using -f Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:08:15 +0200 From: Konstantin Belousov To: Jan Bramkamp Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Chicken/egg problem with pkg Message-ID: <20170310140815.GJ16105@kib.kiev.ua> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.8.0 (2017-02-23) X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_00, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,FREEMAIL_FROM,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on tom.home X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 14:08:24 -0000 On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 02:55:13PM +0100, Jan Bramkamp wrote: > Among other > things FreeBSD 10.3 added a bunch of new *at() system calls like openat. > These *at() system calls are useful inside (capsicum) sandboxes. Your > old 10.1 kernel lacks those systems calls and your old 10.1 libc lacks > the stubs to call them anyways. It is this missing stub that causes the > new libpkg.so to fail to link. Although (removed) rest of your mail is mostly accurate, the cited part is explicitely false. The openat(2) syscall and friends exist even in FreeBSD 8.x. What has changed in 10.2->10.3 is that the version for openat symbol in libc has to be bumped due to some issue with libthr. As result, newer binaries require a symbol version which does not exist in older libc. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Mar 10 14:16:41 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D415D04D00 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 14:16:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crest@rlwinm.de) Received: from smtp.rlwinm.de (smtp.rlwinm.de [148.251.233.239]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B6C51BF6 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 14:16:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crest@rlwinm.de) Received: from crest.lan.bultmann.eu (unknown [87.253.189.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.rlwinm.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B7A99714D for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 15:16:32 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Chicken/egg problem with pkg To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20170310140815.GJ16105@kib.kiev.ua> From: Jan Bramkamp Message-ID: <4ce7ad6f-afa8-4523-9fe3-97ba18cbf03b@rlwinm.de> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 15:16:32 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170310140815.GJ16105@kib.kiev.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 14:16:41 -0000 On 10/03/2017 15:08, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 02:55:13PM +0100, Jan Bramkamp wrote: >> Among other >> things FreeBSD 10.3 added a bunch of new *at() system calls like openat. >> These *at() system calls are useful inside (capsicum) sandboxes. Your >> old 10.1 kernel lacks those systems calls and your old 10.1 libc lacks >> the stubs to call them anyways. It is this missing stub that causes the >> new libpkg.so to fail to link. > > Although (removed) rest of your mail is mostly accurate, the cited part > is explicitely false. The openat(2) syscall and friends exist even in > FreeBSD 8.x. What has changed in 10.2->10.3 is that the version for > openat symbol in libc has to be bumped due to some issue with libthr. As > result, newer binaries require a symbol version which does not exist in > older libc. Thanks for the correction. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Mar 10 15:53:08 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08C89D04789 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 15:53:08 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mail.madpilot.net (grunt.madpilot.net [78.47.145.38]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C14F31C0F for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 15:53:07 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mad@madpilot.net) Received: from mail (mail [192.168.254.3]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3vfsH54tp0zZxM; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:53:05 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=madpilot.net; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:date:message-id:from:from :references:subject:subject:received:received; s=mail; t= 1489161183; x=1490975584; bh=9snw1MzHX2E0qLyA6iXE6ryoUe15akfyYKn mmC94vxk=; b=IzsdkXMvYQGffyjmtDQM9iL3e5uk/6yMD/9QjkOHbQFDC+PV1o/ ukX1cEp64AN1mN3WiYcE4LKpfVQZt3xcsylzrI8avzTUSbLRJSDU87qtRVkwO7q0 2YwbarC/lp1kf5X1JrQlK0zPYo1fy/odfnsrTHPIvvRlJqkuL2UkVNTA= Received: from mail.madpilot.net ([192.168.254.3]) by mail (mail.madpilot.net [192.168.254.3]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XcKRbRmPXGTL; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:53:03 +0100 (CET) Received: from marvin.madpilot.net (micro.madpilot.net [88.149.173.206]) by mail.madpilot.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:53:03 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Chicken/egg problem with pkg To: Jan Bramkamp , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <06a269f9-b942-5f1b-717c-7de4a60bd263@madpilot.net> <28fa36aa-e1b1-d58b-96cb-17da0428a150@rlwinm.de> From: Guido Falsi Message-ID: Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:53:03 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <28fa36aa-e1b1-d58b-96cb-17da0428a150@rlwinm.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 15:53:08 -0000 On 03/10/17 14:57, Jan Bramkamp wrote: > On 10/03/2017 14:47, Guido Falsi wrote: >> On 03/10/17 14:26, Hans de Hartog wrote: >>> I have an old web server (10.1-RELEASE-p9) which is running for years >>> >>> without any upgrades. Now I want to install a simple port (trafshow, to >>> >>> see what's going on). >>> >>> It first want to upgrade pkg from 1.5.1 to 1.10.0_2 but that doesn't >>> work: >>> >>> [1/1] Upgrading pkg from 1.5.1 to 1.10.0_2... >>> [1/1] Extracting pkg-1.10.0_2: 100% >>> /usr/local/lib/libpkg.so.4: Undefined symbol "openat" >>> >>> Anything I try to do with pkg now gives me this error-message. >>> >>> /var/log/messages says: pkg: pkg upgraded: 1.5.1 -> 1.10.0_2 >>> >>> How do I proceed from here (without upgrading everything, please)? >>> >> >> Have you tried using the "pkg-static" command? It's the same as pkg, but >> statically linked, should sidestep your issue. > > The old pkg-static might work, but it would wreck his system because he > uses a repo with an ABI unsupported by his base + kernel system. He is > lucky he immediately triggered the incompatibility. You are right. I interpreted the OP email as in that he was going to upgrade the Base OS too. He should do that first thing, then upgrade the ports, most probably by forcing them all. -- Guido Falsi From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Mar 10 16:04:41 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02B4DD04AEF for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:04:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD1F43E9 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:04:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id D8AB0D04AE2; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:04:40 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7DB9D04AE0; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:04:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: from mailrelay110.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay110.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.20.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "relay.skynet.be", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 83CFF3DA; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:04:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2C1FgCbzcJY/0nD8VFdHAEBBAEBCgEBg?= =?us-ascii?q?1FBEIEag2CLAZBdKQGVDoIOhiICgj9BFwECAQEBAQEBAWsohRYBBSMzIxALGAI?= =?us-ascii?q?CBSECAg8qHgYTigSxaYImimsBAQEBBgEBAQEkgQuKMoRUgwaCXwWcPJIrdpA7k?= =?us-ascii?q?0AhAjSBAzgsCIcVPzWKGgEBAQ?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2C1FgCbzcJY/0nD8VFdHAEBBAEBCgEBg1FBEIEag2CLAZB?= =?us-ascii?q?dKQGVDoIOhiICgj9BFwECAQEBAQEBAWsohRYBBSMzIxALGAICBSECAg8qHgYTi?= =?us-ascii?q?gSxaYImimsBAQEBBgEBAQEkgQuKMoRUgwaCXwWcPJIrdpA7k0AhAjSBAzgsCIc?= =?us-ascii?q?VPzWKGgEBAQ?= Received: from 73.195-241-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([81.241.195.73]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 10 Mar 2017 17:03:10 +0100 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v2AG39F5099444; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 17:03:09 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 17:03:08 +0100 From: Tijl Coosemans To: Dag-Erling =?UTF-8?B?U23DuHJncmF2?= Cc: John Baldwin , ports@freebsd.org, arch@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: manpath change for ports ? Message-ID: <20170310170308.65d903d8@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <86a88tmpe8.fsf@desk.des.no> References: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> <86mvcvojzt.fsf@desk.des.no> <2721378.xr7MGKcqvA@ralph.baldwin.cx> <86a88tmpe8.fsf@desk.des.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:04:41 -0000 On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 10:50:39 +0100 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav wr= ote: > John Baldwin writes: >> I wouldn't even mind if we had both /usr/local/man and /usr/local/share/= man >> so long as our default MANPATH included both if that means applying fewer >> patches to ports. =20 >=20 > The default MANPATH is constructed dynamically from PATH: >=20 > 1. From each component of the user's PATH for the first of: > - pathname/man > - pathname/MAN > - If pathname ends with /bin: pathname/../man > Note: Special logic exists to make /bin and /usr/bin look in > /usr/share/man for manual files. >=20 > If we change this to: >=20 > 1. From each component of the user's PATH for the first of: > - pathname/man > - pathname/MAN > - If pathname ends with /bin or /sbin: pathname/../man and > pathname/../share/man >=20 > we wouldn't need any "special logic", but I really don't like the idea > of having different ports installing man pages in different locations. I grepped the ports tree and found nearly 5700 ports. That's a lot to change all at once but it may be doable. It depends on how much fallout there is in the exp-run. Ports are installed into a staging area now where files can be moved to another location. So a post-install make target could be added that moves the man pages to share/man if necessary (and prints a warning to maintainers in that case). Then all pkg-plist and PLIST_FILES need to be modified (with sed) and PORTREVISION needs to be bumped (also scripted). The same could be done to move info and pkgconfig files. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Mar 10 16:04:45 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3FE7D04B32 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:04:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from home.opsec.eu (home.opsec.eu [IPv6:2001:14f8:200::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A61B7634 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:04:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@opsec.eu) Received: from pi by home.opsec.eu with local (Exim 4.87 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1cmN25-0005Vl-Om; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 17:04:45 +0100 Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 17:04:45 +0100 From: Kurt Jaeger To: Hans de Hartog Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Chicken/egg problem with pkg Message-ID: <20170310160445.GX13006@home.opsec.eu> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:04:46 -0000 Hi! > I have an old web server (10.1-RELEASE-p9) which is running for years I had one with 9.3 something, and upgrading it from the pkg repo took not a huge amount of time, yesterday evening... So maybe upgrading is a good thing, if not too many fancy things are active. -- pi@opsec.eu +49 171 3101372 3 years to go ! From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Mar 10 16:23:36 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFAEBD06402 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:23:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crest@rlwinm.de) Received: from smtp.rlwinm.de (smtp.rlwinm.de [148.251.233.239]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80F311832 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:23:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from crest@rlwinm.de) Received: from crest.lan.bultmann.eu (unknown [87.253.189.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.rlwinm.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 125967171 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 17:23:34 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Chicken/egg problem with pkg To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20170310160445.GX13006@home.opsec.eu> From: Jan Bramkamp Message-ID: <98cf34f3-ebaa-c8f9-dd3b-3a35523d94c0@rlwinm.de> Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 17:23:33 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.12; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170310160445.GX13006@home.opsec.eu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:23:36 -0000 On 10/03/2017 17:04, Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >> I have an old web server (10.1-RELEASE-p9) which is running for years > > I had one with 9.3 something, and upgrading it from the pkg repo > took not a huge amount of time, yesterday evening... > > So maybe upgrading is a good thing, if not too many fancy things > are active. You can use pkg upgrade -F to prefetch the packages if you connection and/or mirror is slow. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Mar 10 16:30:26 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CE1FD066D1 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:30:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9D941A6D for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:30:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E43CDD066CF; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:30:25 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1D5FD066CD; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:30:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: from mailrelay110.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay110.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.20.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "relay.skynet.be", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F05021A69; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:30:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2D6DQBu08JY/0nD8VFdHAEBBAEBCgEBg?= =?us-ascii?q?1FBEIEIEo5hkF0pAZUOgg6GHAQCAoJAQhYBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUWAQU6HCMQCw4?= =?us-ascii?q?KCSUPKh4GE4oEtAmKawEBAQEBBQEBAQEkiz2KOQWcPJIrdnqPQZNAJgYrgQM4L?= =?us-ascii?q?AiHFT81ihoBAQE?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2D6DQBu08JY/0nD8VFdHAEBBAEBCgEBg1FBEIEIEo5hkF0?= =?us-ascii?q?pAZUOgg6GHAQCAoJAQhYBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUWAQU6HCMQCw4KCSUPKh4GE4oEt?= =?us-ascii?q?AmKawEBAQEBBQEBAQEkiz2KOQWcPJIrdnqPQZNAJgYrgQM4LAiHFT81ihoBAQE?= Received: from 73.195-241-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([81.241.195.73]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 10 Mar 2017 17:30:21 +0100 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v2AGUKou099602; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 17:30:21 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 17:30:20 +0100 From: Tijl Coosemans To: Baptiste Daroussin Cc: arch@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: manpath change for ports ? Message-ID: <20170310173020.60f75f7b@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> References: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:30:26 -0000 On Tue, 7 Mar 2017 00:56:10 +0100 Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > My proposal is to add to the manpath /usr/local/share/man in default > man(1) command in FreeBSD 12 (MFCed to 11-STABLE) > > and either provide an errata for 11.0/10.3 or a > /usr/local/etc/man.d/something.conf via a port or something like that > for those two, what do you think? I don't think we can expect users to install the latest errata or to run the latest head or stable, so a port would be needed. Could the pkg port be used for this? From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Mar 10 16:38:35 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06F0ED06914 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:38:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E37DA1F93 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:38:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id DF781D06912; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:38:34 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF0ADD06911; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:38:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "troutmask", Issuer "troutmask" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AA5DB1F92; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:38:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id v2AGcUvu046399 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 10 Mar 2017 08:38:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id v2AGcU6t046398; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 08:38:30 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 08:38:30 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: Tijl Coosemans Cc: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= , ports@freebsd.org, arch@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin , John Baldwin , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: manpath change for ports ? Message-ID: <20170310163830.GA46344@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Reply-To: sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu References: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> <86mvcvojzt.fsf@desk.des.no> <2721378.xr7MGKcqvA@ralph.baldwin.cx> <86a88tmpe8.fsf@desk.des.no> <20170310170308.65d903d8@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20170310170308.65d903d8@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 16:38:35 -0000 On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 05:03:08PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 10:50:39 +0100 Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > > John Baldwin writes: > >> I wouldn't even mind if we had both /usr/local/man and /usr/local/share/man > >> so long as our default MANPATH included both if that means applying fewer > >> patches to ports. > > > > The default MANPATH is constructed dynamically from PATH: > > > > 1. From each component of the user's PATH for the first of: > > - pathname/man > > - pathname/MAN > > - If pathname ends with /bin: pathname/../man > > Note: Special logic exists to make /bin and /usr/bin look in > > /usr/share/man for manual files. > > > > If we change this to: > > > > 1. From each component of the user's PATH for the first of: > > - pathname/man > > - pathname/MAN > > - If pathname ends with /bin or /sbin: pathname/../man and > > pathname/../share/man > > > > we wouldn't need any "special logic", but I really don't like the idea > > of having different ports installing man pages in different locations. > > I grepped the ports tree and found nearly 5700 ports. That's a lot to > change all at once but it may be doable. It depends on how much fallout > there is in the exp-run. ln -s /usr/local/share/man /usr/local/man should cause the manpages to land where you want. Then port maintainers can sweep ports/ to allow for the removal of symlink. On a side note, it is unfortunate that one cannot set the environmental variable MANPATH as documented without either a mysterious vanishing of man pages or an idiotic warning appear with each invocation of man, apropos, ... -- Steve 20161221 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IbCHE-hONow From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Mar 10 17:32:42 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9780BD068AE for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 17:32:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BF6B1147 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 17:32:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 78810D068AB; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 17:32:42 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 764DAD068A9; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 17:32:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: from mailrelay110.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay110.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.20.137]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "relay.skynet.be", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 971AB1145; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 17:32:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2C2FgDu4sJY/0nD8VFdDg4BAQQBAQoBA?= =?us-ascii?q?YNRQRCBGoNgiwGQXSkBlQ6CDoYiAoJAQhYBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUWAQUjMyMQCw4?= =?us-ascii?q?KAgIFIQICDyoeBhOKBLF6giaKaAEBAQEGAQEBASSBC4oyhFSDBoJfBY9YjGSSK?= =?us-ascii?q?3aQO5NAJgkoWCs4LAiGVz4/NQGKGQEBAQ?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2C2FgDu4sJY/0nD8VFdDg4BAQQBAQoBAYNRQRCBGoNgiwG?= =?us-ascii?q?QXSkBlQ6CDoYiAoJAQhYBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUWAQUjMyMQCw4KAgIFIQICDyoeB?= =?us-ascii?q?hOKBLF6giaKaAEBAQEGAQEBASSBC4oyhFSDBoJfBY9YjGSSK3aQO5NAJgkoWCs?= =?us-ascii?q?4LAiGVz4/NQGKGQEBAQ?= Received: from 73.195-241-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([81.241.195.73]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 10 Mar 2017 18:32:31 +0100 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v2AHWTe2099955; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 18:32:30 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 18:32:29 +0100 From: Tijl Coosemans To: Steve Kargl Cc: Dag-Erling =?UTF-8?B?U23DuHJncmF2?= , ports@freebsd.org, arch@freebsd.org, Baptiste Daroussin , John Baldwin , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: manpath change for ports ? Message-ID: <20170310183229.72ec31e4@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <20170310163830.GA46344@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> <86mvcvojzt.fsf@desk.des.no> <2721378.xr7MGKcqvA@ralph.baldwin.cx> <86a88tmpe8.fsf@desk.des.no> <20170310170308.65d903d8@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20170310163830.GA46344@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 17:32:42 -0000 On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 08:38:30 -0800 Steve Kargl wrote: > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 05:03:08PM +0100, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> On Fri, 10 Mar 2017 10:50:39 +0100 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav = wrote: =20 >>> John Baldwin writes: =20 >>>> I wouldn't even mind if we had both /usr/local/man and /usr/local/shar= e/man >>>> so long as our default MANPATH included both if that means applying fe= wer >>>> patches to ports. =20 >>>=20 >>> The default MANPATH is constructed dynamically from PATH: >>>=20 >>> 1. From each component of the user's PATH for the first of: >>> - pathname/man >>> - pathname/MAN >>> - If pathname ends with /bin: pathname/../man >>> Note: Special logic exists to make /bin and /usr/bin look in >>> /usr/share/man for manual files. >>>=20 >>> If we change this to: >>>=20 >>> 1. From each component of the user's PATH for the first of: >>> - pathname/man >>> - pathname/MAN >>> - If pathname ends with /bin or /sbin: pathname/../man and >>> pathname/../share/man >>>=20 >>> we wouldn't need any "special logic", but I really don't like the idea >>> of having different ports installing man pages in different locations. = =20 >>=20 >> I grepped the ports tree and found nearly 5700 ports. That's a lot to >> change all at once but it may be doable. It depends on how much fallout >> there is in the exp-run. =20 >=20 > ln -s /usr/local/share/man /usr/local/man >=20 > should cause the manpages to land where you want. Then port > maintainers can sweep ports/ to allow for the removal of symlink.=20 Yeah, I had to deal with installing through symlinks in the Linux ports because bin, lib and sbin have become symlinks there now. There are complications with that. FreeBSD releases have a bug in libarchive that causes problems when extracting hardlinks through symlinks. Recent versions of pkg have workarounds for that but not everybody runs it yet. Before you can create the symlink you have to move the existing directory, but what if the new directory already exists? Will you overwrite files? Commands like pkg-which and pkg-delete only work through the symlink because the new paths are not in the pkg database. Packages that don't know about the symlink may try to create it as a directory or remove it as a directory on uninstall. I ended up avoiding it at all costs in the Linux ports by moving files around in the staging area if necessary. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Mar 10 18:40:35 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AC8AD06AF8 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 18:40:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) Received: from udns.ultimatedns.net (static-24-113-41-81.wavecable.com [24.113.41.81]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CEAC1BDB for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 18:40:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) Received: from ultimatedns.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by udns.ultimatedns.net (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id v2AIeSNW039834 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 10:40:34 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from bsd-lists@bsdforge.com) To: In-Reply-To: References: <20170308160420.GG22199@rancor.immure.com>, From: "Chris H" Subject: Re: Best way to cause synth to ignore rebuilding of a port?? Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 10:40:34 -0800 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=fixed MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 18:40:35 -0000 On Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:34:45 +0000 Matthew Seaman wrote > On 2017/03/08 16:04, Bob Willcox wrote: > > Note that I haven't tried ver 52 of firefox, but from what I've read it > > sounds like all plugins/addons other than flash are no longer supported. I think the answer to your question can be answered by using pkg(8)'s lock option. As memory serves; synth honors anything pkg has to offer. HTH --Chris > > Make that: all *NPAPI* plugins other than Flash are now unsupported. > That's stuff like the Java plugin or the OpenH264 Video Codec from Cisco > (which I seem to have installed and can no-longer remember why. Some > sort of video conference thing a long time ago). > > Ordinary add-ons like AddBlock-Plus or NoScript don't use NPAPI and so > are not affected by this move. > > I've been on version 52 on my Mac desktop for a while with no noticeable > problems (well, none beyond what you normally got with FF in earlier > versions.) > > Cheers, > > Matthew From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Fri Mar 10 20:26:28 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84254D06EBA for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 20:26:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byshenknet@byshenk.net) Received: from v1.leiden.byshenk.net (v1.leiden.byshenk.net [37.97.209.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DBFD1EE4 for ; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 20:26:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from byshenknet@byshenk.net) Received: by v1.leiden.byshenk.net (Postfix, from userid 1002) id B127575931; Fri, 10 Mar 2017 21:19:17 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 21:19:17 +0100 From: Greg Byshenk To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Chicken/egg problem with pkg Message-ID: <20170310201917.GY731@v1.leiden.byshenk.net> References: <06a269f9-b942-5f1b-717c-7de4a60bd263@madpilot.net> <28fa36aa-e1b1-d58b-96cb-17da0428a150@rlwinm.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <28fa36aa-e1b1-d58b-96cb-17da0428a150@rlwinm.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.0 (2016-08-17) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 20:26:28 -0000 On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 02:57:32PM +0100, Jan Bramkamp wrote: > On 10/03/2017 14:47, Guido Falsi wrote: > > On 03/10/17 14:26, Hans de Hartog wrote: > >> I have an old web server (10.1-RELEASE-p9) which is running for years > >> without any upgrades. Now I want to install a simple port (trafshow, to > >> see what's going on). > >> > >> It first want to upgrade pkg from 1.5.1 to 1.10.0_2 but that doesn't > >> work: > >> > >> [1/1] Upgrading pkg from 1.5.1 to 1.10.0_2... > >> [1/1] Extracting pkg-1.10.0_2: 100% > >> /usr/local/lib/libpkg.so.4: Undefined symbol "openat" > >> > >> Anything I try to do with pkg now gives me this error-message. > >> > >> /var/log/messages says: pkg: pkg upgraded: 1.5.1 -> 1.10.0_2 > >> > >> How do I proceed from here (without upgrading everything, please)? > > > > Have you tried using the "pkg-static" command? It's the same as pkg, but > > statically linked, should sidestep your issue. > > The old pkg-static might work, but it would wreck his system because he > uses a repo with an ABI unsupported by his base + kernel system. He is > lucky he immediately triggered the incompatibility. Will pkg-static install an old version of pkg? One option might be to check if the old version of pkg is in /var/cache/pkg, then maybe pkg-static could be used to reinstall the old version. Alternatively, if ports are installed, one could rebuild the old version of pkg from the port. Or even download the appropriate old ports tree to be able to build the old pkg. That would also enable building an old(?) version of trafshow. But I agree with others that the right answer is to upgrade the system. Running old systems facing the Internet is a bad idea. -- greg byshenk - gbyshenk@byshenk.net - Leiden, NL From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Mar 11 06:47:16 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67487D07CA6 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 06:47:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartmann@walstatt.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4940473 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 06:47:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartmann@walstatt.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 4584FD07CA4; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 06:47:16 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44ED5D07CA3; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 06:47:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartmann@walstatt.org) Received: from mout.gmx.net (mout.gmx.net [212.227.15.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mout.gmx.net", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass DE-2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97DA271; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 06:47:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ohartmann@walstatt.org) Received: from thor.intern.walstatt.dynvpn.de ([92.225.8.31]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003 [212.227.17.190]) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MIuSH-1coVb02cIb-002WzY; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 07:41:47 +0100 Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 07:41:38 +0100 From: "O. Hartmann" To: Masachika ISHIZUKA Cc: martin.mato@orange.fr, ports@freebsd.org, x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: xf86-video-intel-2.99.917.20170228 Message-ID: <20170311074138.284e7cba@thor.intern.walstatt.dynvpn.de> In-Reply-To: <20170307.134202.1638391944167935510.ish@amail.plala.or.jp> References: <1666557442.12084.1488845807827.JavaMail.www@wwinf1g10> <20170307.134202.1638391944167935510.ish@amail.plala.or.jp> Organization: WALSTATT User-Agent: OutScare 3.1415926 X-Operating-System: ImNotAnOperatingSystem 3.141592527 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; boundary="Sig_/vjQzC4_QLhZMEmLfWiEA0Cm"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:17jJlObHyIrKdtE9BH5bXnd2Y6EPLA5TuzUHGM0lxWXz0tbMC8t LiLAJEw/fAzioaAWkLsQQWWRj7UM3NGox1p9Fa/rDK3bCNgtmYlws152D3KpR4oG77wK5ml KXW6FR+CRm8ox/MK8QzIK5Z6mfLxukRPTgkFPY31HlmqsUfIzU707DQGAicuiZtezwjIsPQ f1f2LkAesKE0TpduHDPgg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:ayaWlpPqM/M=:JkAivf5FfiYCmRMj3KoCRe Tor8Ntb83xnFZEKD5TnXaTxDMuLcf+3K4c6VkbF/agNtyAnhDDiwvwHZq+sXz4NR21QQ4CUev puqdSb+2o9H8NsmuLY1UYT9PIAzjU0h0K63iaHckZhkfuscucre0Yeq3hCcF92D4CXXDOqlm+ c2PamlBicQ4uQWf8+0WLY/rU9vPiKBLwXNVDbStasJWenFSBcmR1BRC2jZGH04N/fYXpI5nP1 sSSlrMl3ef0ya3IeiLXd0R/eg15Gv4tof0a968/iQPmMVbA3umMSWyCEIMXSnFMpCXxPS33pY oOym4GbzxIMP2cRzean10UPmye0L5ofr5Rg6yBW6tOMcL9bm4dwB7qV6D9SS9WdsHjUWr+ymF uTAdc8Geo/rSim6aPdzlQOYEZ6nICNc0VZxl065TOObkVGOL4WyRFkBSkIDQYIv8XwrJBjlN8 yRSsz9F8SjYjqpfzXnWpLGb2Inv8DgO9XrZFaiD3/amqCSucjDSqi0Q/0zA4ylIiW05gdhOmw bOGKNucs5VqgTS8z7jt0xhgw0gzNAPwfg1HT1kbDWJrf8sUXSspt7G/y6zE6zSADjyr7FrdCX Wbf4HvUUvLQD+qrMHBURfykDJ5LEvIDjdQMhD9F8x6S6oqVf7sa9zu5kDLlFSuSAR8khu0RjG wpD0UOkU/v1JgvcFJqgsv51QR/TvPcqQXl43mwkhhb338AAg8j423UrTA6BQQQkxyqFNzaLl+ 4FdusW7DUL4V4TA6r5ZD3I8jTTB6vfP7fQd2utlXj16dLyYC74T3wX9wszA= X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 06:47:16 -0000 --Sig_/vjQzC4_QLhZMEmLfWiEA0Cm Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Am Tue, 07 Mar 2017 13:42:02 +0900 (JST) Masachika ISHIZUKA schrieb: > My Dell XPS12 (9Q33, Corei7-4500U, haswell) is working well with > xf86-video-intel-2.99.917.20170228 (sna) without kld_list=3D"i915kms". >=20 > Issue for both r435512(2.99.917.20170228) and r433863(2.99.917.20170103) > is not showing any windows after resuming blanking screen. > Workaround is that the switching console (ctl-alt-F1) and > reswitching x11 (clt-alt-F9). It's shown windows again. Same here with a Lenovo E540 notebook with a Haswell HD4200 graphics.. Some= times the black screen goes away by itself and the xdm login/X11 graphics screen pops= up, sometimes not and I have to switch first to console and then to the tty with the grap= hics output back to get the GUI. --=20 O. Hartmann Ich widerspreche der Nutzung oder =C3=9Cbermittlung meiner Daten f=C3=BCr Werbezwecke oder f=C3=BCr die Markt- oder Meinungsforschung (=C2=A7 28 Abs.= 4 BDSG). --Sig_/vjQzC4_QLhZMEmLfWiEA0Cm Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iLUEARMKAB0WIQQZVZMzAtwC2T/86TrS528fyFhYlAUCWMOcIgAKCRDS528fyFhY lHHeAgCOJwuY9FivQ+cN4ORHQ0IRPD8oOWzAawv2lwPOOrOr6QhTMq6N8TCsjcbX CXH0pikTReB93ItkDB3myRYVNPMVAf9MFiZl29LFEONoS+p4dczoD2m+7RKNaa4S 0vjX8ehjl0GoqyVL1ZURjK5v+XL4FHjTbgFBIScb/Zm+dFy10jbM =gZO3 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/vjQzC4_QLhZMEmLfWiEA0Cm-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Mar 11 07:13:06 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 600D5D07667 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 07:13:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BF1A14B0 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 07:13:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 487A8D07665; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 07:13:06 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47AA4D07663; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 07:13:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2721F14AE; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 07:13:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1235) id 7874526FC; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 07:13:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 08:13:05 +0100 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= Cc: John Baldwin , freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, ports@freebsd.org, arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: manpath change for ports ? Message-ID: <20170311071305.ueqmrlid7vt33ngt@ivaldir.net> References: <20170306235610.cmpxk27jhoafel6l@ivaldir.net> <86mvcvojzt.fsf@desk.des.no> <2721378.xr7MGKcqvA@ralph.baldwin.cx> <86a88tmpe8.fsf@desk.des.no> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="q5nqo26jhuu3zfbd" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86a88tmpe8.fsf@desk.des.no> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170225 (1.8.0) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 07:13:06 -0000 --q5nqo26jhuu3zfbd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 10:50:39AM +0100, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav wrote: > John Baldwin writes: > > I wouldn't even mind if we had both /usr/local/man and /usr/local/share= /man > > so long as our default MANPATH included both if that means applying few= er > > patches to ports. >=20 > The default MANPATH is constructed dynamically from PATH: >=20 > 1. From each component of the user's PATH for the first of: > - pathname/man > - pathname/MAN > - If pathname ends with /bin: pathname/../man > Note: Special logic exists to make /bin and /usr/bin look in > /usr/share/man for manual files. >=20 > If we change this to: >=20 > 1. From each component of the user's PATH for the first of: > - pathname/man > - pathname/MAN > - If pathname ends with /bin or /sbin: pathname/../man and > pathname/../share/man Which I have just done :) Bapt --q5nqo26jhuu3zfbd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCAAdFiEEgOTj3suS2urGXVU3Y4mL3PG3PloFAljDo34ACgkQY4mL3PG3 Plq6uhAA30BLx/hsSJ8VXCwZkwXsmiDnH6/xBJd1VOiCNvQA9tHY2c2pGNj5cgkv HYBBvc9JfgIkLhxSiHtdRjB5KDnsHFLU1O4FQPxyACmk52YXdaO4OA7W0FFrzc8a uZbbHppjHQWUmfI2SEQTsB/wDCh2u8svWi6J3MluuvvyA7AMYk63DsmNJ0yJQOC0 0XjiaATvBRBmWtPlxMs2NIF3TyhzHHLPmCt2hvBsQcyHR9re5W9WajGO/n4eTM+v L0RQfGKtaGkSur+CeZ/4C7fTRKsFJbNPiMPDTnVTRyz/q3BNCJAXzSLu4Ew3qLcL j5ZfLBwdlWLvPayO4oyRPxSZuCp3azJuMQQP5rB7vQL6AbsHxl40tVC+Ff58ZcGc mSYN0bRbfyt8slIbTxCKwYIztSuDygHgPltEW2G0nqTcqRhsc43zqcjw5nz4yjkC lCMvYvbXjjn1OYqQpkgnzOGmm0Q1++CFeVN9YCgMMvbWOUk/9A7rjG/wXun2nI1d mLgj0YAwq5CU572lZpdMu8Ys7nozP5obvqUnpEi1mH2bJfJxFo8Uq8uh6tY51QZX YzvxoNb08JeIGkjWWDA/pw/4gGcqzLsrdGlNMqrgXCi56qq7JwP7ZyzfRfBamEQX uuade4jxbx+B/d4IKhCsjn0J0P49lMzRA92Afe5t2WL5NPAX42g= =dMw5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --q5nqo26jhuu3zfbd-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Mar 11 09:36:20 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 25928D07A0A for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 09:36:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from ms-10.1blu.de (ms-10.1blu.de [178.254.4.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E0ED77BA for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 09:36:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: from [88.217.104.113] (helo=localhost.unixarea.de) by ms-10.1blu.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1cmciu-0005Tg-Nw for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 09:50:00 +0100 Received: from localhost.my.domain (c720-r292778-amd64 [127.0.0.1]) by localhost.unixarea.de (8.15.2/8.14.9) with ESMTPS id v2B8o0D0002032 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 09:50:00 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) Received: (from guru@localhost) by localhost.my.domain (8.15.2/8.14.9/Submit) id v2B8nxM0002026 for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 09:49:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from guru@unixarea.de) X-Authentication-Warning: localhost.my.domain: guru set sender to guru@unixarea.de using -f Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 09:49:59 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: double location of the jail? Message-ID: <20170311084959.GA1969@c720-r292778-amd64> Reply-To: Matthias Apitz Mail-Followup-To: Matthias Apitz , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT r292778 (amd64) User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Con-Id: 51246 X-Con-U: 0-guru X-Originating-IP: 88.217.104.113 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 09:36:20 -0000 Hello, I have a CURRENT server with the sources of the kernel in /usr/src: # svn info /usr/src Path: /usr/src Working Copy Root Path: /usr/src URL: svn://svn.freebsd.org/base/head Relative URL: ^/head Repository Root: svn://svn.freebsd.org/base Repository UUID: ccf9f872-aa2e-dd11-9fc8-001c23d0bc1f Revision: 314251 Node Kind: directory Schedule: normal Last Changed Author: imp Last Changed Rev: 314250 Last Changed Date: 2017-02-25 07:11:59 +0100 (Sat, 25 Feb 2017) # uname -a FreeBSD jet 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #0 r314251: Sat Feb 25 17:14:40 CET 2017 root@r303343-amd64:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64 and a jail created in it within a ZFS pool: # mount /dev/da0p2 on / (ufs, local, journaled soft-updates) devfs on /dev (devfs, local, multilabel) poudriere on /poudriere (zfs, local, nfsv4acls) poudriere/poudriere on /poudriere/poudriere (zfs, local, nfsv4acls) poudriere/poudriere/jails on /poudriere/poudriere/jails (zfs, local, nfsv4acls) poudriere/poudriere/ports on /poudriere/poudriere/ports (zfs, local, nfsv4acls) poudriere/poudriere/jails/freebsd-r314251 on /usr/local/poudriere/jails/freebsd-r314251 (zfs, local, noatime, nfsv4acls) poudriere/poudriere/ports/ports-20170304 on /usr/local/poudriere/ports/ports-20170304 (zfs, local, noatime, nfsv4acls) /dev/md0 on /tmp (ufs, local) # poudriere jail -l JAILNAME VERSION ARCH METHOD TIMESTAMP PATH freebsd-r314251 12.0-CURRENT r314250 amd64 svn+http 2017-03-04 19:48:34 /usr/local/poudriere/jails/freebsd-r314251 all this worked fine to compile some ~1800 ports. Today I wanted to make a copy with tar of /usr/src and /usr/obj (to move both to some other host to update this without 'make buildworld' and 'make buildkernel' there). I was surprised to find below /usr/obj somehow a copy of the jail: # ls -l /usr/obj/usr/local/poudriere/jails/freebsd-r314251 total 4 drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 Mar 3 16:48 usr # find /usr/obj/usr/local/poudriere/jails/freebsd-r314251/ | wc -l 109769 # find /usr/local/poudriere/jails/freebsd-r314251 | wc -l 174006 What does this mean, why is something of the jail below /usr/obj? The inodes of the two dirs are not the same: # ls -lid /usr/local/poudriere/jails/freebsd-r314251 /usr/obj/usr/local/poudriere/jails/freebsd-r314251 4 drwxr-xr-x 17 root wheel 21 Mar 4 21:19 /usr/local/poudriere/jails/freebsd-r314251 31139731 drwxr-xr-x 3 root wheel 512 Mar 3 16:48 /usr/obj/usr/local/poudriere/jails/freebsd-r314251 i.e. this is not to some kind of symlink. Can I remove the tree /usr/obj/usr/local/poudriere/? Thanks for some clarification. matthias -- Matthias Apitz, ✉ guru@unixarea.de, ⌂ http://www.unixarea.de/ ☎ +49-176-38902045 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Mar 11 09:53:13 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 116EDD0508C for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 09:53:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 018AA1160 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 09:53:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 00F0CD0508B; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 09:53:13 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 00A64D0508A for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 09:53:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from ainaz.pair.com (ainaz.pair.com [209.68.2.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D96D0115F for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 09:53:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from anthias (vie-188-118-249-200.dsl.sil.at [188.118.249.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 42D753F530 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 04:53:04 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:53:01 +0100 (CET) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both) Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 09:53:13 -0000 As some of you may have seen, I have done a bit of work on bsd.sites.mk recently. One question I ran into: If a site offers both HTTPS and HTTP, which of the two do we prefer? (Or do we want to list both?) Gerald @FreeBSD.org From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Mar 11 10:34:00 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B8A7D0623C for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:34:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7437767 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:33:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E6AE9D0623A; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:33:59 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E657CD06238 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:33:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: from mailrelay111.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay111.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.20.138]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "relay.skynet.be", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CFCE766 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:33:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2BcBQB50cNY/0nD8VFdHAEBBAEBCgEBg?= =?us-ascii?q?1FBEBCBCo1uc5BeKQGVEYIOIoV6BAICgkBAGAECAQEBAQEBAWsohRYBBTocIxA?= =?us-ascii?q?LGAklDyoeBhOKBLQCimYBAQEBAQUBAQEBJIs9ijkFnEGGdos2dnoBj0GTQh84g?= =?us-ascii?q?QQ5LAhBhlg/NYpQAQEB?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2BcBQB50cNY/0nD8VFdHAEBBAEBCgEBg1FBEBCBCo1uc5B?= =?us-ascii?q?eKQGVEYIOIoV6BAICgkBAGAECAQEBAQEBAWsohRYBBTocIxALGAklDyoeBhOKB?= =?us-ascii?q?LQCimYBAQEBAQUBAQEBJIs9ijkFnEGGdos2dnoBj0GTQh84gQQ5LAhBhlg/NYp?= =?us-ascii?q?QAQEB?= Received: from 73.195-241-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([81.241.195.73]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 11 Mar 2017 11:33:56 +0100 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v2BAXtt8001703; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 11:33:56 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 11:33:55 +0100 From: Tijl Coosemans To: Gerald Pfeifer Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both) Message-ID: <20170311113355.0f3f8b77@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:34:00 -0000 On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:53:01 +0100 (CET) Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > As some of you may have seen, I have done a bit of work on > bsd.sites.mk recently. > > One question I ran into: If a site offers both HTTPS and HTTP, > which of the two do we prefer? (Or do we want to list both?) https first for people that run 'make makesum'. http second for people that can't use https. For pkg-descr WWW I always use https if available. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Mar 11 12:14:35 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A9B7D08FFB for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:14:35 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-yw0-x232.google.com (mail-yw0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F28F81DD5 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:14:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: by mail-yw0-x232.google.com with SMTP id o4so37877771ywd.3 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 04:14:34 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=o0gWZxK6mYidJlkct7S3aXkMEBTIXonvg8DwHoEaXjM=; b=RO2P9pUwYSdMc4s8v+adF6eZYIrFpUpq6UQw5ZNYCWvN3tdTVJAjSIWGz+T+x7u0qn B9A96UrTh4ykFDs6eyOCbqhJbl6QQkCEyr+MmEkvlrAhBpJ0X8JSmRhBGJycfSOesB1E Qm5wH9YRItUuYIBrDv0Ihl78ah1zt9Mpx6tE4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=o0gWZxK6mYidJlkct7S3aXkMEBTIXonvg8DwHoEaXjM=; b=o4ZSAgd4pescqI/IkhKTeUwuJChh805t3pb/qCZrecRPPXrGp1467yLzck/VVqG+W8 S/tLdQE//m4W1zeuUcf9vliCaUbfC2XaC+vhLq/xjprOALr49z15VLZ/Qcyt4ZbS/Y2I s4M2q+ipksunNcH67yZAp+r2B3fdu5Ih25ivhVmguJE8GVdecd1zRpiVXmaJHBWfmZQp 4laxbm6Ewf4vJkUZrtHd+yY0ZBbPShbiLZEAp0TZduB5aQhmFjZHt1iXgC6gIiMmw4Im LokoOqXfOPcJXJOMGBAq6upzmUH3akLI2QrkuBbZSFOizEFpRoJAxLXxlwm7GEz/+BxF 1xyA== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39liL8EjceZhsExYhzOxIW42yHMpSSv9kKYLNzW8n36D5g00IP1da4/EzChv260WZJkovuw815LMHzhFcQ== X-Received: by 10.129.46.69 with SMTP id u66mr10846037ywu.355.1489234474146; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 04:14:34 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.37.215.85 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 04:14:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20170308160420.GG22199@rancor.immure.com> References: <20170308160420.GG22199@rancor.immure.com> From: Eitan Adler Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 04:14:03 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Best way to cause synth to ignore rebuilding of a port?? To: Bob Willcox Cc: ports list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:14:35 -0000 On 8 March 2017 at 08:04, Bob Willcox wrote: > What is the best way to get synth to simply ignore certain ports when running > the upgrade-system command with it? I would like for it to not upgrade firefox > (don't want to lose my tab groups) so I'd rather that it not even consider > updating firefox again, at least not till some form of tab groups are again > supported. FYI: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/tab-groups-panorama/ -- Eitan Adler From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Mar 11 12:18:52 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C7BBD062EF for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:18:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D74E1F71 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:18:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 4CDD5D062EC; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:18:52 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C918D062EB for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:18:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:6074::16:84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 294C41F6F; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:18:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbeich@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1354) id 715B55859; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:18:51 +0000 (UTC) To: gerald@pfeifer.com, tijl@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <20170311113355.0f3f8b77@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> Message-Id: <20170311121851.715B55859@freefall.freebsd.org> Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:18:51 +0000 (UTC) From: jbeich@freebsd.org (Jan Beich) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:18:52 -0000 Tijl Coosemans writes: > On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:53:01 +0100 (CET) Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > >> As some of you may have seen, I have done a bit of work on >> bsd.sites.mk recently. >> >> One question I ran into: If a site offers both HTTPS and HTTP, >> which of the two do we prefer? (Or do we want to list both?) > > https first for people that run 'make makesum'. It was made MITM-friendly sometime ago. https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/324051 From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Mar 11 13:34:28 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35CC6D07DB8 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 13:34:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@immure.com) Received: from maul.immure.com (108-84-10-9.lightspeed.austtx.sbcglobal.net [108.84.10.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15E049C6 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 13:34:27 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bob@immure.com) Received: from rancor.immure.com ([10.1.132.9]) by maul.immure.com with esmtp (Exim 4.88 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1cmhA9-000GsO-Mw; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 07:34:26 -0600 Received: from rancor.immure.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v2BDYPHi033627; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 07:34:25 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from bob@rancor.immure.com) Received: (from bob@localhost) by rancor.immure.com (8.15.2/8.14.9/Submit) id v2BDYP9H033625; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 07:34:25 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from bob) Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 07:34:25 -0600 From: Bob Willcox To: Eitan Adler Cc: ports list Subject: Re: Best way to cause synth to ignore rebuilding of a port?? Message-ID: <20170311133424.GA28652@rancor.immure.com> Reply-To: Bob Willcox References: <20170308160420.GG22199@rancor.immure.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.7.2 (2016-11-26) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 13:34:28 -0000 On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 04:14:03AM -0800, Eitan Adler wrote: > On 8 March 2017 at 08:04, Bob Willcox wrote: > > What is the best way to get synth to simply ignore certain ports when running > > the upgrade-system command with it? I would like for it to not upgrade firefox > > (don't want to lose my tab groups) so I'd rather that it not even consider > > updating firefox again, at least not till some form of tab groups are again > > supported. > > FYI: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-us/firefox/addon/tab-groups-panorama/ So, it seems then that firefox 57 (Nov this year) is where all non WebExtensions add-ons support end. Guess I have a few more months then. Sure seems that the Mozilla team isn't prioritizing their users very high in their furure plans. > > > -- > Eitan Adler -- Bob Willcox | If a program is useful, it will be changed. bob@immure.com | Austin, TX | From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Mar 11 17:14:54 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C277ED089F4 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 17:14:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7714177D for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 17:14:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id A6D03D089F3; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 17:14:54 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A66BED089F1 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 17:14:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: from mailrelay101.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay101.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.20.128]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "relay.skynet.be", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A6960177C; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 17:14:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2CyCwB7L8RY/0nD8VFdHAEFAQsBg1JBE?= =?us-ascii?q?BB4Eo5hkFwpAZcfKoV4AoJAQxUBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUWAQVWIxALGAklDyoeGYo?= =?us-ascii?q?ECrQEilwBAQEBAQEEAQEBAQEBEw+LPYUghRkFnEGDeIJ+izZ2kDyTQzUigQQ5L?= =?us-ascii?q?AhBhlg/NYl5AQEB?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2CyCwB7L8RY/0nD8VFdHAEFAQsBg1JBEBB4Eo5hkFwpAZc?= =?us-ascii?q?fKoV4AoJAQxUBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUWAQVWIxALGAklDyoeGYoECrQEilwBAQEBA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEEAQEBAQEBEw+LPYUghRkFnEGDeIJ+izZ2kDyTQzUigQQ5LAhBhlg/NYl5AQE?= =?us-ascii?q?B?= Received: from 73.195-241-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([81.241.195.73]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 11 Mar 2017 18:13:40 +0100 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v2BHDdND004028; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 18:13:39 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 18:13:39 +0100 From: Tijl Coosemans To: portmgr@FreeBSD.org Cc: jbeich@freebsd.org (Jan Beich), gerald@pfeifer.com, ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both) Message-ID: <20170311181339.58bcf2a8@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <20170311121851.715B55859@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <20170311113355.0f3f8b77@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20170311121851.715B55859@freefall.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="MP_/.uJhgdCw0I3_CL2xYgym22i" X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 17:14:54 -0000 --MP_/.uJhgdCw0I3_CL2xYgym22i Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:18:51 +0000 (UTC) jbeich@freebsd.org (Jan Beich) wrote: > Tijl Coosemans writes: >> On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:53:01 +0100 (CET) Gerald Pfeifer wrote: >>> As some of you may have seen, I have done a bit of work on >>> bsd.sites.mk recently. >>> >>> One question I ran into: If a site offers both HTTPS and HTTP, >>> which of the two do we prefer? (Or do we want to list both?) >> >> https first for people that run 'make makesum'. > > It was made MITM-friendly sometime ago. > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/324051 Ugh, can portmgr approve the attached patch? --MP_/.uJhgdCw0I3_CL2xYgym22i Content-Type: text/x-patch Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=fetchenv.patch Index: Mk/bsd.port.mk =================================================================== --- Mk/bsd.port.mk (revision 435950) +++ Mk/bsd.port.mk (working copy) @@ -2007,7 +2007,9 @@ BUILD_FAIL_MESSAGE+= Try to set MAKE_JOB .include "${PORTSDIR}/Mk/bsd.ccache.mk" +.if !make(makesum) FETCH_ENV?= SSL_NO_VERIFY_PEER=1 SSL_NO_VERIFY_HOSTNAME=1 +.endif FETCH_BINARY?= /usr/bin/fetch FETCH_ARGS?= -Fpr FETCH_REGET?= 1 --MP_/.uJhgdCw0I3_CL2xYgym22i-- From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Mar 11 17:18:23 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05465D08A98 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 17:18:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6165189B for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 17:18:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E23FDD08A97; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 17:18:22 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1E6FD08A96 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 17:18:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from anoxia.adamw.org (anoxia.adamw.org [104.225.8.149]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "anoxia.adamw.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 748D2189A; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 17:18:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by anoxia.adamw.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 585b353e TLS version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:18:20 -0700 (MST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\)) Subject: Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both) From: Adam Weinberger In-Reply-To: <20170311181339.58bcf2a8@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:18:18 -0700 Cc: FreeBSD Ports Management Team , freebsd-ports , gerald@pfeifer.com, Jan Beich Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <727BA28F-ECA5-4094-B1D1-E8F122770D56@adamw.org> References: <20170311113355.0f3f8b77@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20170311121851.715B55859@freefall.freebsd.org> <20170311181339.58bcf2a8@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> To: Tijl Coosemans X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 17:18:23 -0000 > On 11 Mar, 2017, at 10:13, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >=20 > On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:18:51 +0000 (UTC) jbeich@freebsd.org (Jan = Beich) wrote: >> Tijl Coosemans writes: >>> On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:53:01 +0100 (CET) Gerald Pfeifer = wrote: >>>> As some of you may have seen, I have done a bit of work on >>>> bsd.sites.mk recently. >>>>=20 >>>> One question I ran into: If a site offers both HTTPS and HTTP,=20 >>>> which of the two do we prefer? (Or do we want to list both?) =20 >>>=20 >>> https first for people that run 'make makesum'. =20 >>=20 >> It was made MITM-friendly sometime ago. >>=20 >> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/324051 >=20 > Ugh, can portmgr approve the attached = patch?_______________________________________________ If distfiles from sites with invalid certificates won't fetch for = end-users, they won't fetch during makesum either. # Adam --=20 Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Mar 11 17:45:25 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16844D08F50 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 17:45:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 050866B6 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 17:45:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 0461CD08F4F; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 17:45:25 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04023D08F4E for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 17:45:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from ainaz.pair.com (ainaz.pair.com [209.68.2.66]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBA036B5; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 17:45:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gerald@pfeifer.com) Received: from anthias (vie-188-118-249-200.dsl.sil.at [188.118.249.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ainaz.pair.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BA9473F5D6; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:45:21 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 18:45:19 +0100 (CET) From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Jan Beich , Tijl Coosemans , ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both) In-Reply-To: <20170311121851.715B55859@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: References: <20170311121851.715B55859@freefall.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 17:45:25 -0000 On Sat, 11 Mar 2017, Jan Beich wrote: >> https first for people that run 'make makesum'. > It was made MITM-friendly sometime ago. > > https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/324051 With that, isn't https pretty pointless? I guess I'll leave things as are, then, for that mirror that offers both. Another question on "https first", Tijl. Some MASTER_SITEs have a dozen entries or more, and I always thought that the infrastructure picks one of these randomly every time. In some tests I did today with two sites (one https, one http) it _always_ picked the first, confirming your point. Or is that only the case for `make makesum`? Gerald From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Mar 11 18:03:45 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F05B4D087AF for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 18:03:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDF2D173A for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 18:03:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id DD577D087AE; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 18:03:45 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCFF5D087AD for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 18:03:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from anoxia.adamw.org (anoxia.adamw.org [104.225.8.149]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "anoxia.adamw.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7999F1739; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 18:03:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by anoxia.adamw.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id 90ac68e0 TLS version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 11:03:43 -0700 (MST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\)) Subject: Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both) From: Adam Weinberger In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 11:03:41 -0700 Cc: Jan Beich , Tijl Coosemans , ports@FreeBSD.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <21738FEF-3F75-4814-ACCB-DE197B677C6E@adamw.org> References: <20170311121851.715B55859@freefall.freebsd.org> To: Gerald Pfeifer X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 18:03:46 -0000 > On 11 Mar, 2017, at 10:45, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > > On Sat, 11 Mar 2017, Jan Beich wrote: >>> https first for people that run 'make makesum'. >> It was made MITM-friendly sometime ago. >> >> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/324051 > > With that, isn't https pretty pointless? I guess I'll leave > things as are, then, for that mirror that offers both. > > Another question on "https first", Tijl. Some MASTER_SITEs > have a dozen entries or more, and I always thought that the > infrastructure picks one of these randomly every time. In > some tests I did today with two sites (one https, one http) > it _always_ picked the first, confirming your point. Or is > that only the case for `make makesum`? > > Gerald That's activated by RANDOMIZE_MASTER_SITES. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Mar 11 18:32:52 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58AF6D06556 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 18:32:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38CB3C2D for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 18:32:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 380E4D06553; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 18:32:52 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37B1BD06552 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 18:32:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: from mail-yw0-x243.google.com (mail-yw0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c05::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 01E3BC2A for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 18:32:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lists@eitanadler.com) Received: by mail-yw0-x243.google.com with SMTP id h11so6277771ywa.2 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:32:51 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=eitanadler.com; s=0xdeadbeef; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=BPTi6t4r6/Cmy3e1Laa5eCeNsRj2VmvcOYLj6FlHigI=; b=sKHxRy2mMBVYYuW8XVNhSiFbBkLAw/BtVTO8nQQ6YOumspmwLt449pqzLA8q8F9dBv oYk30/f3dplGx1RTONfD8zmz8VtoDrjQkLISDD1mHcU8b1U8EpQQ+OHN3v1ymr0NCF+A Rxs0axss840ulOGZBLZ7uKjaE6YUh9ACq36rk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BPTi6t4r6/Cmy3e1Laa5eCeNsRj2VmvcOYLj6FlHigI=; b=VArOG5KLF2JNLj2Km3PNFaA9kSXsf1LbpBQFkGJxmfcysJ+f+gaN4xT+EAXZJHMW8Q zmH7PHbpSmdpbrEGQm2R7+x9O+GsPxh5VVhAtaS8wyJd+y6tttDXOQIeC3JZINSkXRV3 WSaklSB0ld0BPi5E2G/1bTm7FK7kolaHZw0lobpJxTqfGMNJPhH9pgurK3NryepZgM+B h5vh5DouSWN6Z2tKce1Q3tu26dUPwuliCUFh/WCa6rwhq/bSGT5Kra5RAQSlASXuwImK amjITJbOqI3LEFQRCjPhNXf+n2TW4n8wL3j1iQd/aK4aihspYOrSicZcKRb8g25uthmo Ba8A== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39m3MLwKU8ZSYpMJDD+/VJCkWOjFm7Sq5CeUpctH0ahB8CRtWz7TzcA25wQ7tJ/GplJlwuBf7t/q5y2FLw== X-Received: by 10.129.46.69 with SMTP id u66mr11852311ywu.355.1489257170950; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:32:50 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.37.215.85 with HTTP; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:32:20 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20170311181339.58bcf2a8@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> References: <20170311113355.0f3f8b77@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20170311121851.715B55859@freefall.freebsd.org> <20170311181339.58bcf2a8@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> From: Eitan Adler Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:32:20 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both) To: Tijl Coosemans , "ports-secteam@freebsd.org" Cc: Ports Management Team , FreeBSD Ports , Gerald Pfeifer , Jan Beich Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 18:32:52 -0000 On 11 March 2017 at 09:13, Tijl Coosemans wrote: > On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:18:51 +0000 (UTC) jbeich@freebsd.org (Jan Beich) wrote: >> Tijl Coosemans writes: >>> On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:53:01 +0100 (CET) Gerald Pfeifer wrote: >>>> As some of you may have seen, I have done a bit of work on >>>> bsd.sites.mk recently. >>>> >>>> One question I ran into: If a site offers both HTTPS and HTTP, >>>> which of the two do we prefer? (Or do we want to list both?) >>> >>> https first for people that run 'make makesum'. >> >> It was made MITM-friendly sometime ago. >> >> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/324051 > > Ugh, can portmgr approve the attached patch? I can't approve on behalf of portmgr but I'd like to echo this request on behalf of ports-secteam. Maintainers rarely verify the hashes that makesum generates. I wish we can go further and filter out non-HTTPS sites during makesum. -- Eitan Adler From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Mar 11 19:29:20 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41AA7D07ADB for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 19:29:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26DE9EDD for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 19:29:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 2342ED07ADA; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 19:29:20 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22EB8D07AD9 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 19:29:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) Received: from mailrelay101.isp.belgacom.be (mailrelay101.isp.belgacom.be [195.238.20.128]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "relay.skynet.be", Issuer "GlobalSign Organization Validation CA - SHA256 - G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 26A9BEDB; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 19:29:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tijl@freebsd.org) X-Belgacom-Dynamic: yes X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2DjBABRT8RY/0nD8VFdGwEBAQMBAQEJA?= =?us-ascii?q?QEBg1FBEBCBCo1uc5BcKQGVEYIOKoV4AoJAQBgBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUWAQU6HCM?= =?us-ascii?q?QCxgJJQ8qHgYTigQKs3eKWwEBAQEBAQEDAQEBAQEBIos9ijkFlWuGVoZ2izZ2i?= =?us-ascii?q?yiFFJNDHziBBDksCEGGWD81iXkBAQE?= X-IPAS-Result: =?us-ascii?q?A2DjBABRT8RY/0nD8VFdGwEBAQMBAQEJAQEBg1FBEBCBCo1?= =?us-ascii?q?uc5BcKQGVEYIOKoV4AoJAQBgBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUWAQU6HCMQCxgJJQ8qHgYTi?= =?us-ascii?q?gQKs3eKWwEBAQEBAQEDAQEBAQEBIos9ijkFlWuGVoZ2izZ2iyiFFJNDHziBBDk?= =?us-ascii?q?sCEGGWD81iXkBAQE?= Received: from 73.195-241-81.adsl-dyn.isp.belgacom.be (HELO kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org) ([81.241.195.73]) by relay.skynet.be with ESMTP; 11 Mar 2017 20:29:13 +0100 Received: from kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org [127.0.0.1]) by kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id v2BJTBtG004762; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 20:29:12 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from tijl@FreeBSD.org) Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 20:29:11 +0100 From: Tijl Coosemans To: Adam Weinberger Cc: FreeBSD Ports Management Team , freebsd-ports , gerald@pfeifer.com, Jan Beich Subject: Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both) Message-ID: <20170311202911.4dccde2f@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> In-Reply-To: <727BA28F-ECA5-4094-B1D1-E8F122770D56@adamw.org> References: <20170311113355.0f3f8b77@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20170311121851.715B55859@freefall.freebsd.org> <20170311181339.58bcf2a8@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <727BA28F-ECA5-4094-B1D1-E8F122770D56@adamw.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 19:29:20 -0000 On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:18:18 -0700 Adam Weinberger wrote: > On 11 Mar, 2017, at 10:13, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >> On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:18:51 +0000 (UTC) jbeich@freebsd.org (Jan >> Beich) wrote: >>> Tijl Coosemans writes: >>>> On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:53:01 +0100 (CET) Gerald Pfeifer >>>> wrote: >>>>> As some of you may have seen, I have done a bit of work on >>>>> bsd.sites.mk recently. >>>>> >>>>> One question I ran into: If a site offers both HTTPS and HTTP, >>>>> which of the two do we prefer? (Or do we want to list both?) >>>> >>>> https first for people that run 'make makesum'. >>> >>> It was made MITM-friendly sometime ago. >>> >>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/324051 >> >> Ugh, can portmgr approve the attached >> patch?_______________________________________________ > > If distfiles from sites with invalid certificates won't fetch for > end-users, they won't fetch during makesum either. - Given that web browsers have become much less forgiving about such certificates this is probably much less of a problem nowadays. - Possibly, many of these errors are because users forgot to install ca_root_nss. We can hold port maintainers to a higher standard and expect them to have this installed. - Such sites should perhaps be removed from MASTER_SITES. If that's not possible FETCH_ENV can be set in the port Makefile. From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Mar 11 19:53:05 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94C68D082E3 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 19:53:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 805821DDD for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 19:53:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 7FA1FD082E2; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 19:53:05 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7F425D082E1 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 19:53:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from anoxia.adamw.org (anoxia.adamw.org [104.225.8.149]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "anoxia.adamw.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EAB451DDA; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 19:53:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by anoxia.adamw.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id a7e12a0d TLS version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:53:03 -0700 (MST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\)) Subject: Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both) From: Adam Weinberger In-Reply-To: <20170311202911.4dccde2f@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:53:01 -0700 Cc: freebsd-ports , gerald@pfeifer.com, Jan Beich , FreeBSD Ports Management Team Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20170311113355.0f3f8b77@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20170311121851.715B55859@freefall.freebsd.org> <20170311181339.58bcf2a8@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <727BA28F-ECA5-4094-B1D1-E8F122770D56@adamw.org> <20170311202911.4dccde2f@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> To: Tijl Coosemans X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 19:53:05 -0000 > On 11 Mar, 2017, at 12:29, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >=20 > On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:18:18 -0700 Adam Weinberger > wrote: >> On 11 Mar, 2017, at 10:13, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >>> On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:18:51 +0000 (UTC) jbeich@freebsd.org (Jan >>> Beich) wrote: =20 >>>> Tijl Coosemans writes: =20 >>>>> On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:53:01 +0100 (CET) Gerald Pfeifer >>>>> wrote: =20 >>>>>> As some of you may have seen, I have done a bit of work on >>>>>> bsd.sites.mk recently. >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> One question I ran into: If a site offers both HTTPS and HTTP,=20= >>>>>> which of the two do we prefer? (Or do we want to list both?) =20= >>>>>=20 >>>>> https first for people that run 'make makesum'. =20 >>>>=20 >>>> It was made MITM-friendly sometime ago. >>>>=20 >>>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/324051 =20 >>>=20 >>> Ugh, can portmgr approve the attached >>> = patch?_______________________________________________ =20= >>=20 >> If distfiles from sites with invalid certificates won't fetch for >> end-users, they won't fetch during makesum either. >=20 > - Given that web browsers have become much less forgiving about such > certificates this is probably much less of a problem nowadays. > - Possibly, many of these errors are because users forgot to install > ca_root_nss. We can hold port maintainers to a higher standard and > expect them to have this installed. > - Such sites should perhaps be removed from MASTER_SITES. If that's = not > possible FETCH_ENV can be set in the port Makefile. I don't disagree with any point. Do you want to submit a PR so that an = exp-run of sorts can see how many distfiles we're talking about? # Adam --=20 Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Mar 11 21:25:18 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22539D08AEF for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 21:25:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (unknown [127.0.1.3]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D75F10CD for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 21:25:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 0CCF4D08AEE; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 21:25:18 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C75BD08AED for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 21:25:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: from anoxia.adamw.org (anoxia.adamw.org [104.225.8.149]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "anoxia.adamw.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E7EC10CC; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 21:25:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adamw@adamw.org) Received: by anoxia.adamw.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPSA id c234eead TLS version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 14:25:15 -0700 (MST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\)) Subject: Re: bsd.sites.mk: Do we prefer http or https (or both) From: Adam Weinberger In-Reply-To: Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 14:25:13 -0700 Cc: freebsd-ports , gerald@pfeifer.com, Jan Beich , FreeBSD Ports Management Team Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <6E5B500B-DBF5-4D57-A624-BAF5F5709980@adamw.org> References: <20170311113355.0f3f8b77@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <20170311121851.715B55859@freefall.freebsd.org> <20170311181339.58bcf2a8@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <727BA28F-ECA5-4094-B1D1-E8F122770D56@adamw.org> <20170311202911.4dccde2f@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> To: Tijl Coosemans X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259) X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 21:25:18 -0000 > On 11 Mar, 2017, at 12:53, Adam Weinberger wrote: >=20 >> On 11 Mar, 2017, at 12:29, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >>=20 >> On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:18:18 -0700 Adam Weinberger >> wrote: >>> On 11 Mar, 2017, at 10:13, Tijl Coosemans wrote: >>>> On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 12:18:51 +0000 (UTC) jbeich@freebsd.org (Jan >>>> Beich) wrote: =20 >>>>> Tijl Coosemans writes: =20 >>>>>> On Sat, 11 Mar 2017 10:53:01 +0100 (CET) Gerald Pfeifer >>>>>> wrote: =20 >>>>>>> As some of you may have seen, I have done a bit of work on >>>>>>> bsd.sites.mk recently. >>>>>>>=20 >>>>>>> One question I ran into: If a site offers both HTTPS and HTTP,=20= >>>>>>> which of the two do we prefer? (Or do we want to list both?) =20= >>>>>>=20 >>>>>> https first for people that run 'make makesum'. =20 >>>>>=20 >>>>> It was made MITM-friendly sometime ago. >>>>>=20 >>>>> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/324051 =20 >>>>=20 >>>> Ugh, can portmgr approve the attached >>>> = patch?_______________________________________________ =20= >>>=20 >>> If distfiles from sites with invalid certificates won't fetch for >>> end-users, they won't fetch during makesum either. >>=20 >> - Given that web browsers have become much less forgiving about such >> certificates this is probably much less of a problem nowadays. >> - Possibly, many of these errors are because users forgot to install >> ca_root_nss. We can hold port maintainers to a higher standard and >> expect them to have this installed. >> - Such sites should perhaps be removed from MASTER_SITES. If that's = not >> possible FETCH_ENV can be set in the port Makefile. >=20 > I don't disagree with any point. Do you want to submit a PR so that an = exp-run of sorts can see how many distfiles we're talking about? Antoine reminded me that this only affects makesum, so I guess there's = really no way of telling what ports this would affect. Either way, your = reasoning is sound and you've convinced me. I'm good with this change; = as you said, worst-case scenario, ports with broken MASTER_SITES can = override FETCH_ENV or a toggle can be added. # Adam --=20 Adam Weinberger adamw@adamw.org https://www.adamw.org From owner-freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Sat Mar 11 22:18:59 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF429D088E0 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 22:18:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from graham@menhennitt.com.au) Received: from homiemail-a69.g.dreamhost.com (sub5.mail.dreamhost.com [208.113.200.129]) (using TLSv1.1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C711ADE4 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 22:18:59 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from graham@menhennitt.com.au) Received: from homiemail-a69.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a69.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E5DC48000B3B for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 14:18:58 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=menhennitt.com.au; h= subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s= menhennitt.com.au; bh=Olzah4BzAPhD0NAzsbvhpGDPpcs=; b=j9Ymn0ftIj JcuPoyk4X2YrA7s4LFuYRnb9dTcuIu1EPvyQZrF5Cpwnj5Rion39+uBs2V1uStwc QtvM6Wl9QrPVAP18W3DrLtLT9lDMpr8+Z0B4jqNujCdfxppcK5wdO4fK19+okqCn e3X7mVNh3vV7jmo4yPSgtCPRE5MxbjBE4= Received: from [203.2.73.68] (c122-107-214-88.mckinn3.vic.optusnet.com.au [122.107.214.88]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: graham@menhennitt.com.au) by homiemail-a69.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3100A48000B39 for ; Sat, 11 Mar 2017 14:18:57 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Thunderbird and UPDATING 20170302 To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org References: <20170302215013.GA76022@elch.exwg.net> <0a05c7ce-6398-b85c-4b40-a7f80b8f4684@netfence.it> <20170303183837.GA1557@elch.exwg.net> From: Graham Menhennitt Message-ID: Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2017 09:18:55 +1100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Mar 2017 22:19:00 -0000 On 09/03/2017 05:09, Andrea Venturoli wrote: > On 03/03/17 19:38, Christoph Moench-Tegeder wrote: > >>> Any interaction with bug 215348 (1)? I'm still using that patch. >> >> Testing revealed that this patch can prevent new profiles from accessing >> lightning, which I considered undesirable. > > Ok. > I kept that patch and just upgraded: my old profile still works, > Lightning included, on both my installations. > > I didn't try Andriy's suggestion, as, for now, I can live with the > inability to create new profiles. I just updated to Thunderbird 45.8.0 via the port and I also have Lightning in my profile. Yet I didn't have any problems. And I don't have the patch installed. Has this been fixed? If so, should a new entry be put into UPDATING (or the existing one removed)? Graham